Loading...
MPO Agenda 11/13/2020COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 November 13, 2020 9:00 AM Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, Esq., Chair Councilman Erik Brechnitz, Vice-Chair Commissioner Penny Taylor Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq. Commissioner Burt L. Saunders Commissioner Donna Fiala Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr. Councilman Mike McCabe Councilman Paul Perry This meeting of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is open to the public and citizen input is encouraged. Any person wishing to speak on any scheduled item may do so upon recognition of the Chairperson. Any person desiring to have an item placed on the agenda shall make a request in writing with a description and summary of the item, to the MPO Director or MPO Chairman 14 days prior to the date of the next scheduled meeting of the MPO. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a recor d of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person requiring special accommodations to participate in this meeting should contact Anne McLaughlin, MPO Executive Director, 72 hours prior to the meeting by calling (239) 252- 8192. The MPO’s planning process is conducted in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Related Statutes. Any person or beneficiary who believes that within the MPO’s planning process they have been discriminated against because of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, disability, or familial status may file a complaint with the Collier MPO Executive Director, Anne McLaughlin at (239) 252 -8192 or by writing to Ms. McLaughlin at 2885 South Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA, PREVIOUS MINUTES AND CONSENT ITEMS 4.A. October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA 6. AGENCY UPDATES 6.A. FDOT 6.B. MPO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 7. COMMITTEE CHAIR REPORTS 7.A. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) 7.A.1. Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report 7.B. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC) 7.B.1. Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report 7.C. BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC) 7.C.1. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report 7.D. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (CMC) 7.E. LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD (LCB) 7.F. Local Coordinating Board Chair Report 8. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (ROLL CALL REQUIRED) 8.A. Approve an Amendment to the FY 2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and an Authorizing Resolution 9. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (NO ROLL CALL) 9.A. Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws 9.B. Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Committee Membership 9.C. Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws 9.D. Appointment of Local Coordinating Board Chairperson 9.E. Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of Request for Professional Services (“RPS”) No. 18-7432-MP, “Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category,” and authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the top five ranked firms, so that proposed agreements may be brought back for the Board’s consideration at a subsequent meeting. 9.F. Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study 9.G. Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Performance Targets for Calendar Year 2021 10. PRESENTATIONS (MAY REQUIRE BOARD ACTION) 10.A. Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) 10.B. Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan 11. DISTRIBUTION ITEMS 11.A. Administrative Modifications to FY2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) 11.B. 2021 MPO Calendar 12. MEMBER COMMENTS 13. NEXT MEETING DATE 13.A. Next Meeting Date - December 11, 2020 - 9:00 a.m. Board of County Commissioners Chambers, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 14. ADJOURN 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 4.A Item Summary: October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 2:49 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 2:49 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:20 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:22 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 4.A Packet Pg. 4 1 Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 October 9, 2020 9:00 a.m. **AND VIRTUALLY VIA ZOOM 1. CALL TO ORDER Meeting was called to order at approximately 9:00 a.m. 2. ROLL CALL Brandy Otero called roll and confirmed a quorum was present. Members Present Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, City of Everglades City, Chair Councilman Erik Brechnitz, City of Marco Island, Vice-Chair (arrived during agenda item 6) Commissioner Andy Solis, Collier County BCC District 2 Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr. District 5 Commissioner Penny Taylor, Collier County BCC District 4 (arrived during agenda item 6) Commissioner Burt Saunders, Collier County BCC District 3 Councilman Paul Perry, City of Naples Councilman Mike McCabe, City of Naples Members Absent Commissioner Donna Fiala, Collier County BCC District 1 MPO Staff Anne McLaughlin, Executive Director Brandy Otero, Principal Planner Karen Intriago, Administrative Assistant Josephine Medina, Senior Planner FDOT L. K. Nandam, District 1 Secretary Victoria Peters Others Present Lorraine Lantz, Chair, Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Joseph Bonness, Chair, Bicycle and Pedestrians Advisory Committee (BPAC) Trinity Scott, Collier County Transportation Planning Bill Gramer, Jacobs Engineering 4.A.1 Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes (14182 : October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes) 2 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner McDaniel served as Chair [pursuant to Hybrid Remote board meeting protocol] and called the meeting to order. Commissioner Saunders led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA, PREVIOUS MINUTES AND CONSENT ITEMS Ms. McLaughlin – requested that items 4B and 4C be continued to the next scheduled MPO Board meeting. 4.A. June 12, 2020 Meeting Minutes Commissioner Saunders moved to approve the September 11, 2020 minutes and consent items with items 4B and 4C continued to next meeting as requested by staff. Councilman McCabe seconded. Passed unanimously. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA 6. AGENCY UPDATES 6.A. FDOT Ms. Peters – Reported progress on removing reflectors embedded in pavement on shoulders on east US 41 that are an impediment to cyclists. Work should begin over the next few months. Anticipated schedule for Draft Tentative FY22 – FY26 Work Program public hearing week will be December 7 to 11, includes online video and in-person library date. Citizen Report expected to go to Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)/Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) November 30th meetings, Board in December. Secretary L.K. Nandam – Your staff has collaborated very well with us on the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). We have been talking to MPO staff and Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) staff to integrate Transit Development Plan (TDP) 10-year plan and future years in the LRTP, how to mitigate congestion on key corridors. Making good progress reflecting transit in the LRTP. Multi-use Corridors of Regional Economic Significance (M-CORES) October 29th Task Force meeting coming up. Task Force members have prepared a great document that sets foundation to go forward with Project Development Environmental (PD&E) studies. 6.B. MPO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Ms. McLaughlin – Nothing to add beyond what’s covered in the agenda 4.A.1 Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes (14182 : October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes) 3 7. COMMITTEE CHAIR REPORTS 7.A. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) 7.A.1. Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report Commissioner McDaniel – suggested that if Committee Chairs are not present to give the report, staff does not need to read them into the record because they are available to read in the agenda packet. Ms. McLaughlin – confirmed that the CAC Chair, Neal Gelfand, is not present today; the Chair Report for September 26, 2020 meeting is in the agenda packet. 7.B. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC) 7.B.1. Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report Ms. McLaughlin – introduced Lorraine Lantz, Chair of the TAC. Ms. Lantz read report into record of TAC meetings held on September 26, 2020 via Zoom. Noted cancellation of joint Lee County/Collier MPO meetings, so committee ensured that there is consistency across county boundaries in the two LRTPs by reviewing roads that cross or share common boundary. Although Chair report notes next meeting will be in-person, learned of Governor’s Executive Order extending authorization to meet remotely, so October 26, 2020 CAC meeting will be on ZOOM platform. 7.C. BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC) 7.C.1. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report Mr. Bonness – Pleased to hear progress is being made on east US41. Read report into record of BPAC meeting held on September 15, 2020 via Zoom. Noted that committee voted to support amendment to bylaws, thought staff did wonderful job. Lengthy discuss on Needs Plan. Committee felt that MPO staff’s revisions sufficiently addressed concerns. Commissioner McDaniel - Everglade City Council recently voted to support a proposed road diet on CR29. Would Councilwoman Middelstaedt like to comment. Councilwoman Middelstaedt - Would like to clarify that proposed road diet ends at the Chokoloskee causeway, the causeway is not affected. 7.D. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (CMC) 7.D.1. Congestion Management Committee Chair Report Ms. McLaughlin – confirmed Chair is not present; report on meeting held September 16, 2020 is in the agenda packet. 7.E. LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD (LCB) 7.E.1. Local Coordinating Board Chair Report 4.A.1 Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes (14182 : October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes) 4 None. Meeting scheduled for following week. 8. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (ROLL CALL REQUIRED) 8.A. Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Cost Feasible Plan (CFP) for planning consistency regarding projects on SR29 in the FY 2021- 2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Ms. McLaughlin – introduced item, read Executive Summary. Acknowledged error on her part in overlooking need to amend 2040 LRTP to account for SR 29 projects; FHWA advised on how to proceed with amendment; need for Board action. Secretary Nandam – error occurred on our part as well. Commissioner Taylor moved to approve the Amendment to 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Regarding SR 29 Projects. Councilman Perry seconded. Ms. Otero took the roll call for vote: Commissioner Taylor – yes Commissioner Solis – yes Councilwoman Middelstaedt – yes Councilman Brechnitz – yes Commissioner McDaniel – yes Councilman Perry – yes Commissioner Saunders – yes Councilman McCabe – yes Motion passed unanimously. 9. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (NO ROLL CALL) 9.A. Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program Ms. Otero – introduced the item, reading from the Executive Summary in the packet. This amendment addresses 5305 funding, which can only be used for transit planning activities. Highlights of the amendment include, showing additional funding for Task to reflect the final allocation (an increase of $11,802) for the FY 20/21 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 5305(d) grant; adding a table to show FY 17/18 and FY 18/19 funding in order to reallocate the remaining funding to personnel expenses; and moving $45,000 in FY 19/20 from the Transit Element of the Long Range Transportation Plan to fund PTNE’s Comprehensive Operational Analysis. Commissioner Taylor moved to approve. Commissioner Saunders seconded. Passed unanimously. 9.B. Approve Draft List of Cost Feasible Projects for the 2045 LRTP for Concurrence to Move Forward for Public Outreach Ms. Otero – introduced item, reading from Executive Summary in the packet. Called on 4.A.1 Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes (14182 : October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes) 5 Jacobs Engineering to make presentation. Mr. Gramer – gave PPT presentation [file available on request through MPO office]. Highlights include: builds upon 2040 LRTP Needs and Cost Feasible Plans; modeling alternative roadway networks; reducing Needs alternatives to Cost Feasible constrained alternative; public input, other plans – Transit Development Plan, Bike-Ped Master Plan, Transportation System Performance Report and Action Plan; new projects that were not identified in 2040 LRTP; completion schedule. Final remark, “The future is coming. We have to plan for it.” Commissioner Taylor – what is the delta between the Needs Plan and the Financially Feasible Plan. Mr. Gramer – approximately 50%, around $1 billion. [subsequently confirmed] Will look it up and report back to the Board. Commissioner Taylor – what was the revenue shortfall due to COVID pandemic reported by FDOT at the last [Board] meeting? Secretary Nandam –Next 5 years shortfall projected to be about $1.4 billion, 30-40% drop in revenues, roughly $200 m per year. My take 10 years, FY28/29 timeframe, to get back to pre-COVID level. The reality may be different. Won’t know until the next Revenue Forecast Conference. Mr. Gramer – responding to follow-up question – 2045 LRTP revenue projections distributed prior to pandemic. Commissioner McDaniel – requests staff give consideration to eastern segment of Randall Blvd – look at allocation of funding possibly shifting to Everglades Blvd and Golden Gate Blvd., may distribute traffic better. Commissioner Taylor - With all the mailboxes, expansion very controversial. Thought Randall improvements were to avoid changes to Everglades Blvd. Ms. Scott – Everglades Blvd was identified in alternate 2A of Randall S-curve study. Residents did not like S-curve. County looked at keeping Everglades Blvd, Vanderbilt Beach Rd to 4 lanes versus 6. Final model run for LRTP received from FDOT yesterday (Alternate 6) shows an area in red (highly congested) in the Existing + Committed Alternative will go away. In draft Cost Feasible Plan, proposal is to widen Everglades Blvd to 4 lanes. Commissioner Taylor moved to approve Draft List of Cost Feasible Projects for the 2045 LRTP for Concurrence to Move Forward for Public Outreach. Commissioner Saunders seconded. Passed unanimously. 9.C. Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Ms. McLaughlin – introduced topic, gave overview of subject matter of chapters and noted that text is still being reviewed by advisory committees and therefore subject to change. Welcome comments from Board members as well. Will present revised draft in November, final in December. Commissioner McDaniel – relies heavily on advisory committee members to advise the Board if any changes needed. 9.D. Approval of the Supplemental Public Transportation Joint Participation Agreement # 2 (JPA) for Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 5305 (d) funding and the authorizing resolution Ms. Otero – introduced topic, reading from Executive Summary. Related to item 9A. Amendment is to recognize the current amended UPWP which will allow the reallocation of 4.A.1 Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes (14182 : October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes) 6 travel budget. Asking the Board to approve the supplemental agreement and the authorizing resolution. Commissioner Taylor moved to approve Supplemental JPA #2 for 5305 funding. Commissioner Saunders seconded. Passed unanimously. 9.E. Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution Ms. Otero – introduced topic, reading from Executive Summary. This amendment recognizes the current amended UPWP approved in 9A. Asking the Board to approve the amendment to the agreement and the authorizing resolution. Commissioner Taylor moved to approve Amendment 1 to PTGA for G1J00. Commissioner Saunders seconded. Passed unanimously. 9.F. Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing resolution Ms. Otero – introduced topic, reading from Executive Summary. This amendment changes the Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and incorporates the amended UPWP adopted earlier this meeting. Asking the Board to approve the amendment to the agreement and the authorizing resolution. Commissioner Taylor moved to approve Amendment 2 to PTGA for G1619. Commissioner Saunders seconded. Passed unanimously. 10. PRESENTATIONS (MAY REQUIRE BOARD ACTION) None. 11. DISTRIBUTION ITEMS None. 12. MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioner Solis – asked for update on bike facility gap on Goodlette Rd [between Immokalee and Vanderbilt Beach Rd (VBR)]; short gap remains between bridge and VBR. Ms. Scott – County intends to fix the gap through Countywide paving contract; in process of getting bids. Commissioner McDaniel – thank you to FDOT for plans to install traffic signal at SR 29 and Westclox. The Immokalee community is very pleased. 4.A.1 Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes (14182 : October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes) 7 13. NEXT MEETING DATE 13.A. Next Meeting Date - November 13, 2020 - 9:00 a.m. Board of County Commissioners Chambers, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 14. ADJOURN There being no further business, Commissioner McDaniel adjourned the meeting at approximately 10:00 a.m. 4.A.1 Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes (14182 : October 9, 2020 Meeting Minutes) 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) related to recent committee actions and recommendations. CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The CAC Chair will provide a verbal report providing additional information regarding recent committee activities. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. CAC Chair Report (DOCX) 7.A.1 Packet Pg. 12 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 7.A.1 Doc ID: 14160 Item Summary: Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 10:07 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 10:07 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/04/2020 2:51 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:25 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 7.A.1 Packet Pg. 13 CAC Committee Chair Report The Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) met virtually (using ZOOM platform) on October 26th and achieved a quorum. Agency Reports Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) – Ms. Peters – was unable to attend the meeting. MPO Director – none beyond the items on the agenda. Committee Actions • After much discussion regarding demand, anticipated ridership and financing, voted to endorse the Collier Area Transit (CAT) Park and Ride Study. • Received briefing on FDOT Central Office communications with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) on lack of progress made towards meeting targets and required development of a Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP) Implementation Plan, voted to endorse FDOT’s Vision Zero Safety Targets for Calendar Year 2021. • Received presentation on changes that have been made to the Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) since the committee last reviewed it. Now in final format. Several studies are just wrapping up and LRTP is being revised to incorporate them – the CAT Park and Ride Study, Local Road Safety Plan, final Transit Development Plan, Multi-use Corridors of Regional Economic Significance (M-CORES), United States Army Corps of Engineers Collier County Coastal Storm Risk Management Feasibility Study. Staff requested that any written comments be submitted no later than November 6th at noon. Committee member noted County Planning Communities map (p2-4, Figure 2-3) is out of date, replace with current version. Reports and Presentations • none Distribution Items • None The next meeting is scheduled to occur on October 26 at 2:00 p.m. at the GMD in a location TBD. Staff is looking for a larger conference room for the committee to meet in, in order to accommodate social distancing. 7.A.1.a Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: CAC Chair Report (14160 : Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report) 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Technical Advisory Committee related to recent committee actions and recommendations. CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. Staff typically provides a verbal report at the MPO Board meeting, although the Chair is welcome to do so. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. TAC Chair Report (DOCX) 7.B.1 Packet Pg. 15 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 7.B.1 Doc ID: 14161 Item Summary: Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 10:09 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 10:09 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:22 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:23 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 7.B.1 Packet Pg. 16 TAC Committee Chair Report The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) met on October 26, 2020 and a quorum was achieved. Agency Reports Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) – Ms. Peters – was unable to attend the meeting. MPO Director – none beyond the items on the agenda. Committee Actions • Endorsed the Collier Area Transit (CAT) Park and Ride Study with one correction – relabeling the site in Everglades City as Carnestown rather than Chamber of Commerce. • Endorsed FDOT’s Vision Zero Safety Targets for Calendar Year 2021. • Received presentation on changes that have been made to the Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) since the committee last reviewed it. Now in final format. Several studies are just wrapping up and LRTP is being revised to incorporate them – the CAT Park and Ride Study, Local Road Safety Plan, final Transit Development Plan (TDP), Multi-use Corridors of Regional Economic Significance (M-CORES), United States Army Corps of Engineers Collier County Coastal Storm Risk Management Feasibility Study. Staff requested that any written comments be submitted no later than November 6th at noon. Committee members asked questions regarding status of TDP and M-CORES. No additional comments were made at the meeting. Reports and Presentations • none Distribution Items • None The next meeting is scheduled to occur on November 30, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. at the GMD conference rooms 609/610. TBD whether this will be a fully virtual meeting or a Remote/In-person Hybrid 7.B.1.a Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: TAC Chair Report (14161 : Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report) 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) related to recent committee actions and recommendations. CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The BPAC Chair will provide a verbal report providing additional information regarding recent committee activities. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive Summary for each action item and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Executive Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. BPAC Chair Report (DOCX) 7.C.1 Packet Pg. 18 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 7.C.1 Doc ID: 14162 Item Summary: Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 10:12 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 10:12 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/04/2020 2:49 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:01 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 7.C.1 Packet Pg. 19 BPAC Committee Chair Report The Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) met using ZOOM as a virtual meeting platform on October 20, 2020 and a quorum was achieved. Public Comment on Items Not on Agenda Ms. Greer – Blue Zones is coordinating a safety coalition involving Naples Pathways Coalition (NPC), Naples Velo and others in support of unified messaging for a public education campaign on bicycle safety. Has discussed with MPO staff, waiting for final Local Roads Safety Plan recommendations. Blue Zones willing to absorb Community Transportation Safety Team (CTST) into their Built Environment Committee. Attempting to coordinate with CTST Chair, Kyle Kemmish but haven’t spoken yet. Agency Reports Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) – Ms. Chesna reported that FDOT has rescinded SUN Trail Call for Projects due to uncertainty over state revenues resulting from less driving during height of the pandemic. Committee Actions • Reviewed and commented on 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan – lengthy question and answer session on roadway priorities as they relate to filling in gaps in bike/ped network and to the NPC Paradise Coast Trail Vision. Received briefing on MPO staff’s proposal to modify current 40:40:20 split for SU funds to incorporate safety projects and planning projects such as future LRTP updates. Revised split would be Planning 3% Bike/Ped 38% Congestion Management 39%, Bridge 19% Safety 2-3%. General consensus was to support proposal. Committee members noted that safety projects are important, particularly in regard to continuing bike/ped public safety education. Committee voted unanimously to approve draft Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan for moving forward. Reports and Presentations • Ms. Chesna presented a PPT on FDOT District 1 Districtwide Pedestrian-Bicycle Active Transportation Plan. Purpose is to build on existing local partner agencies plans, highlight gaps and needs for bike and ped infrastructure, prioritize improvements and outline types of infrastructure intended along FDOT roadways by facility type. • Ms. Huff and Ms. Fendrick presented Everglades City Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, adopted by Everglades City Council on October 6, 2020. The Committee voted unanimously to include the Everglades City Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan in the MPO’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan by reference. • Ms. McLaughlin gave an update on physical quorum requirement and possibility of holding hybrid virtual/in-person meetings in Conference Room 609/610. Member Comments 7.C.1.a Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: BPAC Chair Report (14162 : Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report) • Committee members noted some difficulty watching 2045 LRTP video on home computers and Ms. Peters announced that a CTST meeting had just been scheduled for Thursday 10/22/20 [with Blue Zones hosting.] The next regularly scheduled meeting is on November 17, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. 7.C.1.a Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: BPAC Chair Report (14162 : Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report) 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Local Coordinating Board Chair Report OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Local Coordinating Board (LCB) related to recent LCB actions and recommendations. CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The LCB Chair may provide additional information to the Board. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable Prepared by: Josephine Medina, Senior Planner ATTACHMENT(S) 1. LCB Chair Report (DOCX) 7.F Packet Pg. 22 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 7.F Doc ID: 14163 Item Summary: Local Coordinating Board Chair Report Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 10:14 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 10:14 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/04/2020 2:54 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:02 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 7.F Packet Pg. 23 LCB Chair Report The Local Coordinating Board (LCB) conducted a virtual meeting on Wednesday, October 28th and a quorum was achieved. This was an emergency meeting conducted to ensure the ability to obtain an in- person quorum to conduct business after October 31st. As of November 1st, Governor DeSantis Executive Order 20-69, which suspended requirements for local government bodies, including LCBs, to hold a quorum in-person or meet in a specific public place in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency expired. The LCB took the following action at the meeting: • Reviewed and approved the annual update to the LCB bylaws reducing the in-person quorum requirement from 7 to 4 LCB Members or designated alternates. MPO staff explained to the LCB that this change was the result of many conversations with the Florida Transportation Disadvantaged Commission regarding the difficulties to conduct business with the in-person quorum requirements during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The next LCB meeting is scheduled for December 2nd, 2020 at 1:30 p.m., at the Collier County Government Center, Building F, Collier County Chambers, 3rd Floor - 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples. 7.F.a Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: LCB Chair Report (14163 : Local Coordinating Board Chair Report) 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approve an Amendment to the FY 2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and an Authorizing Resolution OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve an amendment to the FY2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and an authorizing resolution. CONSIDERATIONS: The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has requested that the Collier MPO amend its FY2021-FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to add a transit bus replacement project. The amendment is required for the project to receive federal funds which are programmed in FY2021. FPN 448027-1: $500,000 (Bus Replacement for Collier Area Transit): This project is a result of discussions between FDOT, County Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) and MPO staff to spend down SU funds that resulted from federal reconciliation and FDOT Work Program balancing. The project is on the MPO Board adopted Transit Project Priority list and supports meeting the Transit Asset Management performance measures and targets adopted by the MPO Board. The TIP amendment project sheet, signature page and authorizing resolution are included as Attachment 1; the FDOT letter requesting the amendment is shown as Attachment 2. The MPO is completing the following public involvement steps as required by the MPO’s Public Participation Plan for TIP amendments: · coincides with review of the amendment by the TAC and CAC · announced on the MPO website · distributed via e-mail to applicable list-serve(s) The comment period began on October 19, 2020 and ends with the MPO Board meeting on November 13, 2020. No public comments have been received as of the publication of this agenda packet. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The TAC and CAC voted unanimously to endorse the amendment at their meetings held on October 26, 2020. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the amendment to the FY2021-2025 TIP and the authorizing resolution. Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. FY2021-2025 TIP Amendment Forms and Resolution 2020-15 (PDF) 2. FDOT Request for Amendment (PDF) 8.A Packet Pg. 25 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 8.A Doc ID: 14165 Item Summary: Approve an Amendment to the FY 2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and an Authorizing Resolution Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 11:30 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 11:30 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/04/2020 2:48 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:00 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 8.A Packet Pg. 26 TIP Amendment for Approval by MPO Board on November 13, 2020 for FY 2020/21 through FY 2024/25 TIP FPN Action Project Name Requested by Fund Phase FY 4480271 Transfer MPO SU Funds Collier Area Transit Bus FOOT FTAT CAP 2021 to FTA Replacement 4480271 Transfer MPO SU Funds Collier Area Transit Bus FOOT SU CAP 2021 to FTA Reolacement Responsible TIP Page LRTP Reference Agency Collier County 107A Transit CFP Table 6-7 p 6-32 COLLIER METRO POLIT AN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Amount $500,000 $500,000 Attest: Date: __ _ By:-------­ MPO Chair Date: ------------ Anne McLaughlin Collier MPO Executive Director Printed Name: Elaine Middelstaedt, Esq. Approved2:� �nnfj� Scott�- T�c'h, Deputy County Attorney Title: MPO Chair 107B � 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: FY2021-2025 TIP Amendment Forms and Resolution 2020-15 (14165 : Approve an 8.A.1Packet Pg. 28Attachment: FY2021-2025 TIP Amendment Forms and Resolution 2020-15 (14165 : Approve an 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: FY2021-2025 TIP Amendment Forms and Resolution 2020-15 (14165 : Approve an Amendment to the FY 2021-2025 Transportation 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: FY2021-2025 TIP Amendment Forms and Resolution 2020-15 (14165 : Approve an Amendment to the FY 2021-2025 Transportation Florida Department of Transportation RON DESANTIS GOVERNOR 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 KEVIN J. THIBAULT, P.E. SECRETARY www.fdot.gov September 25, 2020 Ms. Anne McLaughlin, Executive Director Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 2885 S. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Request for Amendment to the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Fiscal Years 2020/2021 through Fiscal Years 2024/2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Dear Ms. McLaughlin: The letter is a formal request for the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) to approve the following amendment to the FY2020/21 – FY2024/25 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) at the November 13, 2020 MPO Board Meeting. This is a new project and it’s required to be added to the MPO’s TIP for this current fiscal year. In order to receive federal funds for this project, these changes are required to be amended into the Collier MPO’s FY2020/2021 through FY2024/2025 TIP. FPN Number Federal Project Description Phase Group Amount Funding Type Fiscal Year Comments 448027-1 Collier County Area Transit Bus Replacement 94 Capital $500,000 FTAT 2021 This is a new project generated from moving Collier MPO funds (40510615201 (SFY21)) to Collier Area Transit Department. The funds are programmed in SFY21. 448027-1 Collier County Area Transit Bus Replacement 94 Capital $500,000 SU 2021 This is a new project generated from moving Collier MPO funds (40510615201 (SFY21)) to Collier Area Transit Department. The funds are programmed in SFY21. 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: FDOT Request for Amendment (14165 : Approve an Amendment to the FY 2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Ms. Anne McLaughlin September 25, 2020 Page 2 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (239) 872-5904. Sincerely, Victoria G Peters Community Liaison VGP:vgp cc: Stacey Blizzard, Federal Highway Administration John Crocker, Federal Transit Administration Mark Reichert, Florida Department of Transportation Samantha Parks, Florida Department of Transportation Denise Strickland, Florida Department of Transportation Wayne Gaither, Florida Department of Transportation Michelle Peronto, Florida Department of Transportation 9/25/2020 | 10:36 AM EDT 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: FDOT Request for Amendment (14165 : Approve an Amendment to the FY 2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve an amendment to the Congestion Management Committee (CMC) bylaws. CONSIDERATIONS: MPO staff prepared an amendment to the CMC bylaws to bring them into conformity with the MPO Bylaws and in the process, added a recommendation that the MPO Board remove all non-voting memberships and change the Lee MPO membership from non-voting to voting. The proposed amendment to the CMC Bylaws is shown in Track Changes in Attachment 1 and as a clean copy in Attachment 2. The current roster for the CMC is shown in Attachment 3. The County Attorney’s Office has reviewed the amendment. The most substantial proposed revisions include: • Removing all non-voting memberships. Non-voting agencies have consistently not attended the CMC meeting. ▪ Adding the Lee MPO to the voting membership list. ▪ Changing the name on the bylaws from CMS/ITS Committee to CMC Committee ▪ Revising the purpose of the committee to match the MPO bylaws COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The CMC voted unanimously to approve the amendment to its bylaws at its meeting on July 15, 2020. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the amendment to the CMC bylaws. Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Principal Planner ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (PDF) 2. Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (PDF) 3. Current CMC Roster (PDF) 9.A Packet Pg. 33 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 9.A Doc ID: 14166 Item Summary: Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 11:35 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 11:35 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/04/2020 2:14 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/04/2020 2:55 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 9.A Packet Pg. 34 BYLAWS Congestion Management Committee of COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANZATION for I @ 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) The fotlowing Bylaws guide the proper functioning of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) Congestion Management @ €MSII+S) Committee (CMC). The intent is to provide procedures and policies to assist the CMCSIES€emmi*ee to accomplish is purpose. SECTION I NAME The name of this Committee shall be the Congestion Management SystemAntelligent @ommittee_1pNlc) of the collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). SECTTON II PURPOSE The CMeS#F-4emm*ee shall serve the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters relating to the arehi{e€ture uodate of the MPO's C onsestion Manasement s (CMP) and the coordination of the CMP with resional stion Manasement Svstem and Intellisent A e TransDortation System archi tecture. B The functions of this CMQ$ltt$€emdtee shall include, but not be limited to, the following: l. To promote coordination among the MPO, Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), Bicvcle and PedestrianPot&+vqts Advisory Committee @PAC) and CMe#f$€ommittee in the identification and resolution of common transportation problems; 2. To identiff potential multimodal projects that will reduce congestion on the network and/or improve the intelligent transportation system; 3. To review studies, plans, programs, or public information documents for potential impacts to congestion on the network and./or impacts to the intelligent transportation system and advise the MPO thereof; 4. To make priority recommendations for CMS/ITS projects to the MPO; 5. To review and update the Congestion Management Process (CMP) as needed; 6. To help review and update the Congestion Management Process component of the Long- Range Transportation Plan; 7. To assist in the development and evaluation of performance mezrsures of potential priorities, 8. To monitor CMS/ITS projects' performance after implementation. SECTION III MF'MBERSHIP APPOINTMENT AND TERM OF APPOINTMFNT A. Members: The CMCS#F$-€emmieee shall of eleven (11)members ln the di be that . CMC 2 @ 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) no*.I'letine memkrs mav desisnate an altemate to replace in their absence. B. Appointment and Term of Appointment: Each member agency representative shall be duly appointed by the member agency and shall serve at the pleasure of his or her member agency. The MPO Statr shall be notified by the Department Director/Administrator of the member agency in writing including electronic communication of the appointrnent or replacement of a member agency's representative. C. Alternate Member: An official alternate member can be designated by the affected voting- member agency by providing such designation in writing to the MPO. The so designated alternate member has the caPacitY to act on behalf of the voting member. MPe staff shatt be notifiC i least seyen (7) days ing,-The altemate member may vote only in the absence ofthe official voting member on a one-vote-per-member basis. D. The Voting amd*oa-Voting Member Agencies are as follows: 1. VOTINGMEMBERAGENCIES Collier County Growth Manage me n I Divis+en- D e part m e nl Transportation Planning DepahenlDivisign Traffi c Operations Depamea{-Divifiq! Collier County Public Services Department Divti;sier. Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Depafrment Division Collier County Administrative Servic e s Department Emergency Management Division Collier County Public Schools Transportation Departnent City of Naples Engineering/Planning Reprcsentative Traffi c Operations Reoresentative City of Marco Island Public Works Departrnent e+O-efberelaMi+ A4ar.or€+A,ppeinm€nt Collier MPO's Citizen Advisory Committee 3 @ 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) Collter MPO's Patl*+'qs-BjSlsk ngdlsdettjsn Advisory Committee Lee County MPo 2. NON-VETINC MEMBER gbriaaq'+Sll*reyM WieesWWWW Sas+Naptes-Pire+is** @M WW The MPO staff will be responsible for maintaining a current list of the names of voting and-{€n-+oting members. SECTION IV OFFICERS. DUTIES AND TRRMS OF OF'FTCE A. Ollicers and Terms of OIIice: I ^^ ('^.,-^, llDt) 1 A Chair and a Vice-Chair of the CMCS#tS-eemmittee shall be elected at the first regularly scheduled me€ting of each calendar year when a quorum is attained and shall hold the offices until their successors are elected. Any voting member may nominate or be nominated as an officer. All elections shall be held by the majority vote of voting members present. B. Chair Duties: 1. The Chair and Vice-Chair shall be voting members of the CMQSII-FS. 2 The Chair shall preside at all meetings and shall be responsible for the conduct ofsuch meetings. - In the absence of the Chair or Vice-Chair, the respective altemate may only act as a regular voting member of the Committee. 4 C. Vice-Chair Duties: 2. @ 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) The Vice- Chair shall, during the absence of the Chair, have and exercise all ofthe duties and powers of the Chair. The Vice- Chair shall also perform such duties as may be assigned by the Chair. D. Absenteeism of an Oflicer: If both the Chair and Vice-Chair are absent from a meeting, the Committee shall elect a voting member present to be the Chair for that meeting. No Altemate member of the Chair or Vice-chair can assume the responsibilities of his/trer official roles. Any vacancy in an office created by a resignation or replacement of an Officer shall be filled by a majority vote of voting memben. The Officer so elected shall fill t}le remainder of the unexpired term of the vacant office. If, at any time, the Committee believes that an Officer is not performing his/her duties in accordance with Section IV, Subsection B, it may recommend oflicer may be removed from ofEce by the MPO at a resular MPO meetins bv a le maioritv vote. 2 I 2 3 the removal of the Officer to the MPO. An SECTION V MIETINCS A. Regular Meetings: The CMQSIIT$€emmit+ee shall meet bimonthly at a date, time and place acceptable to a majority of the voting membership. The date or time may be changed by a majority vote ifseven (7) calendar days notice is given to the voting members' Special meetings may be called by the Chair with a minimum of three (3) calendar day's notice, indicating the reason for the meeting and notiffing all member agencies. C. Notice of Meetings: A minimum of seven (7) calendar days notice shall be given for regular meeting. Agendas should be sent with meeting notices and, whenever possible, minutes of the previous meedng, at least seven (7) calendar days prior to any regular meeting and at least three (3) calendar days prior to any special meeting. D. Agendas: MPO staff is responsible for preparing agendas for each CMCSA+S€ommi+ee meeting. 5 B. Special Meetings: 1 @ 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) Members may request to place items on the tentative agenda by notification to the MPO staff. Adry it€m reqiring €MMTS eo eennnittee shdl deeide if a€tien is te be tal'.en at that reeting er at a subsequent m€€tine A quorum shall consist of five (5) voting C Committee members. A majority of the quorum shall be necessary to act on an item brought before the CMCSms-eommis€e. tn *e aUsenee ef a gue it$ a€xt meeting wher€ t SI'CTION VI AMENDMI,NTS A. Amendments Recommended amendments to Tlhese Bylaws may be amende&endorsed by an affirmative quorum vote of the CMQS/FF$Gemorhee, provided a copy of the proposed amendment(s) shall have been sent to every member at least seven (7) calendar days prior to a vote for endorsement by the CMeS#t$€emmifiee. All proposed amendments shall be voted on at regular meetings. Any and all amendments to the Bylaws will become effective upon endersemeat adootion by the Collier MPO. B. Prior Agreement: These Bylaws supersede and replace any and all Bylaws previously adopted by the Congestion Management System/lntelligenl Transportation System Committee. C. Elfective Date: The Bylaws for the Congestion Management @ Committee of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization were hereby €depted endorsed in an open session with a quorum present and voting on September 16. 2020 by the Congestion Management @ Committee and subsequently endersed adopted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization on E. Quorum: 1. 2. 6 October 9 2020. @ 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) CONGESTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM/ INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM COMMITTEE By: Anthony Khawaja C MCSAF$€enrnni#ee C hair COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION By Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, Esq. MPO Chair ATTESTED BY: Anne Mclaughlin MPO Executive Director COUNTY ATTORNEY By Scott R Teach Deputy Comty Attomey 1 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) BYLAWS for Congestion Management Committee of COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION @ 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) A The following Bylaws guide the proper functioning of the Collier Metropolitan Planning organization's (MPo) congestion Management committee (cMC). The intent is to provide procedures and policies to assist the CMC to accomplish its purpose. SECTION T NAME The name of this Committee shall be the Congestion Management Committee (CMC) of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). SECTION II PURPOSE The CMC shall serve the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters relating to the update of the MPO's Congestion Management Process (CMP) and the coordination of the CMP with regional Congestion Management System and Intelligent Transportation System architectue. B. The firnctions of this CMC shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. To promote coordination among the MPO, Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) and CMC in the identification and resolution of common tansportation problems; 2. To identifu potential multimodal projects that will reduce congestion on the network and/or improve the intelligent transportation system; 3. To review studies, plans, programs, or public information documents for potential impacts to congestion on the network and,/or impacts to the intelligent transportation system and advise the MPO thereof; 4. To make priority recommendations for CMS/ITS projects to the MPO; 5. To review and update the Congestion Management Process (CMP) as needed; 6. To help review and update the Congestion Management Process component of the Long Range Transpo(ation Plan; 7. To assist in the development and evaluation of performance mezuiures of potential priorities, 8. To monitor CMS/ITS projects' performance after implementation. SECTION ITT MEMBERSHIP APPOINTMENT AND TERM OF APPOINTM['NT A. Members: The CMC shall be composed of eleven (l l) voting members appointed by the division, department or agency that they represent. CMC voting members may designate an altemate to replace them in their absence. 1. @ 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) B. Appointment and Term of Appointment: Each member agency representative shall be duly appointed by the member agency and shall serve at the pleasure of his or her member agency. The MPO Stafl shall be notified by the Department Director/Administrator of the member agency in writing including electronic communication of the appointment or replacement of a member agency's representative. C. Alternate Member: An official altemate member can be designated by the affected voting- member agency by providing such designation in writing to the MPO. The so designated altemate member has the capacity to act on khalf of the voting member. The altemate member may vote only in the absence of the official voting member on a one-vote-per-member basis. D. The Voting Member dencies are as follows: I. VOTINGMEMBERAGENCIES Collier County Growth Management Department Transportation Planning Division Traffrc Operations Division Collier County Public Services Department Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Division C ollier C ounty Administrat ive Service s Department Emergency Management Division Collier County Public Schools Transportation Departnent City of Naples Engineering/Planning Representative Traffi c Operations Representative City of Marco Island Public Works Department Collier MPO's Citizen Advisory Committee Collier MPO's Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Lee County MPO The MPO staff will be responsible for maintaining a current list of the names of voting members. l @ 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) SECTION TV OFFICERS. DUTIES AND TERMS OF OFFICE A. Oflicers and Terms of OfIice: A Chair and a Vice-Chair of the CMC shall be elected at the first regularly scheduled meeting of each calendar year when a quorum is attained and shall hold the offices until their successors are elected. Any voting member may nominate or be nominated as an offtcer. All elections shall be held by the majority vote of voting members present. B. Chair Duties: 1. The Chair and Vice-Chair shall be voting members of the CMeSmS. 2 The Chair shall preside at all meetings and shall be responsible for the conduct ofsuch meetings. [n the absence of the Chair or Vice-Chair, the respective alternate may only act as a regular voting member of the Committee. The Vice- Chair shall, during the absence of the Chair, have and exercise all of the duties and powers of the Chair. The Vice- Chair shall also perform such duties as may be assigned by the Chat. D. Absenteeism of an O{Iicer: If both the Chair and Vice-Chair are absent from a meeting, the Committee shall elect a voting member present to be the Chair for that meeting. No Alternate member of the Chair or Vice-chair can assume the responsibilities of his/her official roles' Any vacancy in an office created by a resignation or replacement of an Officer shall be filled by a majority vote of voting members. The Officer so elected shall fill the remainder of the unexpired term ofthe vacant office. If, at any time, the Committee believes that an Officer is not performing his/her duties in accordance with Section IV, Subsection B, it may recommend the removal of the Offrcer to the MPO. An officer may be removed from office by the MPO Board at a regular MPO meeting by a simple majority vote. SECTION V MEETINGS 2 2 I 2 J 4 A. Regular Meetingsl C. Vice-Chair Duties: I I @ 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) The CMC shall meet bimonthly at a date, time and place acceptable to a majority of the voting membership. The date or time may be changed by a majority vote if seven (7) calendar days notice is given to the voting members. B. Special Meetings: Special meetings may be called by the Chair with a minimum of three (3) calendar day's notice, indicating the reason for the meeting and notifring all member agencies. C. Notice of Meetings: A minimum of seven (7) calendar days notice shall be given for regular meeting. Agendas should be sent with meeting notices and, whenever possible, minutes of lhe privious meeting, at least seven (7) calendar days prior to any regular meeting and at least three (3) calendar days prior to any special meeting. D. Agendas: Mpo staff is responsible for preparing agendas for each cMC meeting. Members may request to place items on the tentative agenda by notification to the MPO staff' E. Quorum: 1. A quorum shall consist of five (5) voting CMeS/ITS Cglqlqittgg members' 2. A majority ofthe quorum shall be necessary to act on an item brought before the CMC. SECTION VI AMENDMENTS A. Amendments Recommended amendments to these Bylaws may be endorsed by an affirmative quonrm vote of the CMC, provided a copy of the proposed amendment(s) shall have been sent to every member at least seven (7) calendar days prior to a vote for endorsement by the CMa. A[ proposed amendments shall be voted on at regular meetings' Any- and all amendments to ahe Bylaws will become effective upon adoption by the Collier MPO. B. Prior Agreement: These Bylaws supersede and replace any and all Bylaws previously adopted by the Congestion Management System.{ntelligent Transportation System Committee' 5 @ 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) C. Effective Date: The Bylaws for the Congestion Management Committee of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization were hereby endorsed in an open session with a quonrm present and voting on September 16, 2020-by the Congestion Management Committee and subsequently adopted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization on October 9, 2020. 6 @ 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) CONGESTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEIvI/ INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM COMMITTEE By: Anthony Khawaja CMC Chair COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANZATION By: Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, Esq. MPO Chair ATTESTED BY: Anne Mclaughlin MPO Executive Director COLNryATTORNEY By Scott R Teach Deputy Comty Attomey 1 @ 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) Updated June 23, 2020 CMC Membership List 11 VOTING MEMBERS 1 VACANCY 12 NON-VOTING MEMBERS 5 = QUORUM (per the Committee Bylaws) VOTING MEMBERS 1. Tony Khawaja - Chairman Collier County Traffic Operations 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 239-252-8259 AnthonyKhawaja@colliergov.net (Alt. Pierre Beauvoir) 2. Tim Pinter – Vice–Chair City of Marco Island – Public Works 50 Bald Eagle Drive Marco Island, FL 34145 239-389-5018 tpinter@cityofmarcoisland.com 3. Karen Homiak CAC Representative 4613 Long Key Court Naples, FL 34112 ARWKJH@aol.com 4. Dr. Mort Friedman BPAC Representative 7448 Little Lane #601 Naples, FL 34105 mortmymort@aol.com 5. Lorraine Lantz (alt. Michael Sawyer) Collier County Transportation Planning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 239-252-5832 Lorraine.lantz@colliercountyfl.gov 6. Dan Summers Collier County Emergency Management 8075 Lely Cultural Pkwy., Ste. 442 Naples, FL 34113 239-252-3763 DanSummers@colliergov.net 7. Omar Deleon (alt. Zachary Karto) Public Transit Neighborhood Enhancement 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 103 Naples, FL 34112 239-252-4996 omardeleon@colliergov.net 8. Alison Bickett (alt. Michael Evans) City of Naples 295 Riverside Circle Naples, Florida 34102 239-213-5014 abickett@naplesgov.com 9. John Kasten Collier County School District 5700 Cougar Lane Naples, FL 34109 239-377-0250 KastenHa@collierschools.com 10. Dave Rivera (alt. Andy Holland) – City of Naples 295 Riverside Circle Naples, Florida 34102 239-213-5011 drivera@naplesgov.com 11. Vacant Representing City of Everglades City Mayoral Appointment NON-VOTING MEMBERS 1. Sgt. Greg Sheridan City of Naples Police Dept. 355 Riverside Circle Naples, FL 34102 239-213-4888 gsheridan@naplesgov.com 2. Fire Chief Orly Stolts North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District 1885 Veterans Park Drive Naples, FL 34109 239-597-3222 ocs@northnaplesfire.com 9.A.3 Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Current CMC Roster (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) Updated June 23, 2020 3. Chief Rita Greenberg, Big Corkscrew Island Fire & Rescue District 13250 Immokalee Rd. Naples, FL 34120 239-455-1204 chief@bcifr.com 4. Lt. Mike Dolan Collier County Sherriff’s Office 3301 Tamiami Trail E., Bldg. J Naples, FL 34112 239-252-0333 Mike.Dolan@colliersheriff.org 5. Don Scott Lee County MPO 815 Nicholas Parkway E. Cape Coral, Florida 33915 239-330-2241 dscott@leempo.com (Alternates, Ron Gogoi, Brian Raimondo) 6. Fire Chief Kingman Schuldt Golden Gate Fire Control & Rescue District 14575 Collier Blvd. Naples, FL 34119 239-348-7540 kschuldt@enfd.org 7. Chief Walter Kopka Collier County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 8075 Lely Cultural Pkwy, Suite 267 Naples, FL 34113-9005 239-252-3757 walterkopka@colliergov.net 8. Deputy Chief Nick Biondo East Naples Fire Control & Rescue District 4798 Davis Blvd. Naples, FL 34104 239-774-7111 nbiondo@enfd.org 9. Chief Wayne Martin Isles of Capri Fire District 175 Capri Boulevard Naples, FL 34113 239-394-8770 waynemartin@colliergov.net 10. Fire Chief Paul Anderson, Jr. Immokalee Fire Control District 502 E. New Market Rd. Immokalee, FL 34142 239-657-2111 PAnderson@immfire.com 11. Chief Alan McLaughlin Ochopee Fire Control & Rescue District 201 Buckner Ave. Ochopee, FL 34139 239-695-4144 AlanMcLaughlin@colliergov.net 12. Wayne Watson Collier County Emergency Medical Services 8075 Lely Cultural Parkway, Suite 257 Naples, FL 34113 239-252-3740 waynewatson@colliergov.net Vacant (non-voting) Florida Highway Patrol Major Carlos Vazquez Vacant (non-voting) City of Naples Fire Rescue Department 355 Riverside Circle Naples, FL 34102 213-4900 fire@naplesgov.com Vacant (non-voting) City of Marco Island Police 51 Bald Eagle Drive Marco Island, FL 34145 389-5050 shoya@marcoislandpolice.us 9.A.3 Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: Current CMC Roster (14166 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Committee membership OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve an amendment to the MPO bylaws regarding the Congestion Management Committee (CMC) membership. CONSIDERATIONS: MPO staff prepared an amendment to the CMC bylaws to bring them into conformity with the MPO Bylaws and in the process, added a recommendation that the MPO Board remove all non-voting memberships and change the Lee MPO membership from non-voting to voting. The proposed amendment to the MPO bylaws is shown in Track Changes in Attachment 1 and as a clean copy in Attachment 2. The County Attorney’s Office has reviewed the amendment. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The CMC voted unanimously to approve the amendment to the bylaws regarding membership at its meeting on July 15, 2020. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the amendment to the MPO bylaws. Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Principal Planner ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (see p5) (PDF) 2. Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (PDF) 9.B Packet Pg. 51 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 9.B Doc ID: 14169 Item Summary: Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Committee Membership Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 1:04 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 1:04 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/04/2020 2:43 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/04/2020 2:59 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 9.B Packet Pg. 52 THE BYLAWS OF COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) Description of OrganizationSection I r.0l t.o2 1.03 1.04 1.05 r.06 Section 2 The Agency Composition and Operation of MPO Committees General Information on the MPO Public Access to Agency Meetings and Workshops Rights of Review Agenda and Scheduling-Meeting and Workshops 2.0t 2.O2 2.03 Notice of Meetings and Workshops Agenda Emergency Meetings and Workshops Section 3 Amendments to Bylaws Section I I.OI THE AGEN The Collier Meropolitan Planning Organization, hereinafter referred to as the MPO, is created pursuant to Florida Statute 339.175 and operates under an Interlocal Agreement, as amended and restated dated February 26, 2015, authorized rurder Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes. The parties to the interlocal agreement are Collier County, the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island, the City of Everglades City and the Florida Department of Transportation. Creation of the MPO is for the purpose of implementing Title 23, United States Code, Section 134, and Title 49, United States Code, Sections 1602, 1603, and 1604, and Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 450, and Chapter 339.175, Florida Statutes. The MPO is created to work in cooperation with the Florida Departrnent of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Adminishation. COMPOSITION AND OP ERATION OF THE MPOt.o2 The composition and operation of the MPO shall be as provided in the aforesaid DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION I @ 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (see p5) (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Interlocal Agreemen! the officers of the MPO and their duties, and these rules may be amended as provided by said Agreement. A. Officers - The MPO shall elect a Chairman and a Vice Chairman of the MPO at its first meeting of the calendar year. The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve for a period of one (1) year or until a successor is elected. The Chairman and Vice-Chairman shall be voting members of the MPO. B. Chairman - The Chairman of the MPO shall call and preside at all meetings of the MPO. The Vice Chairman shall serve as Chairman in the absence of the Chairman. C. Aeency Clerk - The staff of the MPO shall maintain the mirutes and other records of the MPO. The minutes shall accurately reflect the proceedings of the MPO. D. Ouorum - A majority of the voting members of the MPO must be present for the MPO to conduct business. E. Rules of Order - Except as otherwise provided in these Bylaws, Roberts Rules of Order, as revised, shall be followed as to any parliamentary procedures at all meetings. F. Reconsiderati on of Matters -Except for MPO approved contracts, any matter which has been voted upon by the MPO may be reconsidered as follows: (1) By a motion to reconsider made by a member who voted with the majority if such motion is made prior to the adjournment of the meeting at which the matter was voted upon. If there were no public speakers on the item, or if all of the public speakers for the item are still present in the boardroom following a successful motion to reconsider, the MPO may elect to rehear the matter during that meeting, or direct the MPO Executive Director to place the item on the agenda for a future meeting. In the event that there were public speakers for the item, and not all ofthe public speakers are still present in the boardroom following a successful motion to reconsider, the MPO Executive Director shall be directed to place the item on the agenda for a future meeting. (2) By a motion to reconsider made by a member who voted with the majority if such motion is made at a regular meeting following the meeting at which the matter was voted upon, but only in accordance with the following: 2 @ 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (see p5) (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management (i) Where a member who voted with the majority wishes the Board to reconsider a matter after the adjoumment of the meeting at which it was voted oq the member shall deliver to the MPO Executive Director a written memorandum stating that the member intends to introduce a motion to rtconsider. The memorandum shall state the date of the regular meeting at which the member intends to introduce such motiorl and shall be delivered to the MPO Executive Director at least six days prior to such meeting. The purpose of this requirement is to allow staff to advise the Board of the legal or other ramifications of reconsideration. (ii) No motion to reconsider shall be made any later than the second regular MPO meeting following the MPO Board's vote on the matter sought to be reconsidered; with the exception of where the basis for such request for reconsideration is found upon MPO's stalls presentation of newly discovered and previously unknown facts which would have been material to the MPO's consideration at the time the item was originally considered but were not known earlier despite the due diligence of MPO staff. (iii) Upon adoption of a motion to reconsider, the MPO Executive Director shall place the item on an agenda not later than the second regular MPO meeting following the meeting at which the motion for reconsideration was adopted. (iv) Atl parties who participated by speaking, submitting registration forms or written materials at the original meeting the item was addressed by the MPO, shall be notified by the MPO Executive Director of the date of reconsideration. (v) MPO approved contracts may only be reconsidered by motion made prior to the adjoumment of the meeting at which the matter was voted upon notwithstanding the discovery of subsequent newly discovered facts. For purposes of this subsection, a contract is defined as an agreement that is legally binding and enforceable in a court of law. I.O3 COMMITTEES There are hereby created five (5) standing committees, which shall be advisory committees to the governing board of the MPO. These advisory committees are the Technical Advisory Committee, Citizens Advisory Committee, the Bicycle 3 @ 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (see p5) (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, the Congestion Management Committee and the Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged which shall have the following composition and duties: A. The Technical Advisory Committee - the responsibility of the Technical Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the TAC, shall be to serve the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters regarding all modes of travel, including promoting coordination among agencies, members, and transportation planning and programming; reviewing technical suffrciency, accuracy and completeness of appropriate studies; making priority recommendations for the transportation plan and program implementation, and providing technical analyses on other transportation planning issues. The TAC shall be composed of thirteen (13) voting members and one (1) non-voting member appointed by the division, department or agency that they represent. TAC voting members may designate an altemate to replace them in their absence. B. Citizens Advisorv Committee - the responsibility of the Citizen Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the CAC, is to advise the MPO reviewing, reacting to, and providing comment on tansportation planning issues and needs regarding all modes of travel from the citizens' perspectives. The CAC shall consist of voting members appointed by the MPO. Membership shall be composed of thirteen ( l3) citizens residing or whose principal place ofbusiness is located in the following areas: City of Naples (2), Collier County Unincorporated Area (5), coinciding with the established Collier County Commission Districts, City of Marco Island (l), City of Everglades City (l), including the area encompassing Chokoloskee and Plantation Island, and; Four (4) citizens at large, including a minimum of one (l) citizen representing the disabled or an advocate for the disabled community, one (1) minority citizen, and two (2) appointed from Collier County to ensure adequate representation fiom all geographic areas of the county, and to include groups having civic, community and economic interests. Bicvcle and Pedestrian Advisorv Committee - The responsibility of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the BPAC, is to provide citizen input into the deliberation of bicycle- and 4 C. @ 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (see p5) (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management pedestrian-related issues within the community, to advise the MPO on developing a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) that is responsive to the needs of the community, to recommend policies and advise the MPO Board of opportunities that will improve the walking and bicycling environment, recommend priorities for bicycle and pedestrian projects and program implementation, and contribute to the BPMP's vision and recommendations regarding the development of the bicycle and pedestrian network. Membership shall be composed of twelve (12) at-large voting members representing a wide cross-section of Collier County residents and neighborhoods, bicycle and pedestrian safety professionals, Safe Routes to Schools organizations, transit riders, local bicycle and pedestrian advocacy groups, organizations that encorrage active transportation from a community health perspective, and advocates for persons with disabilities, and other transportation disadvantaged populations. D. The Consesti on Manasement Committee - the responsibility of the Congestion Management Committee, hereinafter referred to as the CMC, shall be to serve the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters relating to the update of the MPO's Congestion Management Process (CMP) and the coordination of the CMP with regional Congestion Management System and Intelligent Transportation System architecture. The CMC shall be composed of eleven (ll) voting members aad @pointed by the division, department or agency that they represent. CMC voting af,d-nen- ve+ing members may designate an altemate to replace them in their absence. E.The Local Coordinati ns Board for the Transoortation D isadvantased - the responsibility of the Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged, hereinafter referred to as the LCB, shall be to assist the MPO in identiffing local service needs and providing information, advice and direction to the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) on the coordination of services to be provided to the transportation disadvantaged pursuant to Chapter 427.0157, Florida Statutes. In accordance with Rule 41-2.012, Florida Administration Code, all members of the LCB shall be appointed by the designated oflicial planning agency. The designated offrcial planning agency for Collier County is the MPO. The LCB shall be composed of sixteen ( I 6) voting members appointed by the division, departrnent, or agency that they represent. LCB voting members may designate an altemate to replace them in their absence. 5 @ 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (see p5) (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management All public records of t}le MPO, TAC, CAC, BPAC, LCB and CMC Committee are open for inspection and examination at the office of the MPO, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 a-m. and 5:00 p.m. during regular business days. 1.05 PUBLIC ACCESS TO MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS All MPO, TAC, CAC, BPAC, LCB and CMC meetings, workshops and proceedings shall be open to the public. 1.06 RIGHTS OF REVIEW All parties to the Interlocal Agreement, as well as the FHWA and FTA shall have the rights of technical review and comment of MPO projects. Section 2 AGENDA. SCHEDULING ANd MEETIN GS 2.OI NOTICE OF MEETIN AND WORKSHOPS A. Except in the case of emergency meetings or workshops, the MPO shall give at least seven (7) days public notice of any meeting or workshop through the issuance of a press release to local print and broadcast media in the Naples Area B. The press release notice of such meeting or workshop shall provide: 1. The date, time, and place ofthe event. 2. A brief description of the purpose of the event. 3. The address where interested parties may write to obtain a copy of the agenda. A copy of the Agenda may be obtained by writing to the Collier MPO, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Agendas may also be obtained by e-mail at collierrnpglicq!.lqgo11g1 or by accessing the MPO's Web site at colliermpo.net. 2.02 AGENDA A. At least seven (7) days prior to a meeting or workshop, the MPO staff shall prepare and make available an agenda for distribution on request by any interested person. The agenda shall list the items in the order they are 6 r.O4 GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE MPO @ 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (see p5) (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management to be considered; provided, however, that for good cause stated in the record by the person who is designated to prcside at the meeting, items may be considered out of their listed order. B. The agenda shall be specific as to the items to be considered. All matters shall be listed on the agenda. l. Any person who desires to have an item placed on the agenda of the meeting of the MPO shall request in writing that the item be considered at the next scheduled meeting of the MPO, provided, however, that such a request must be received fourteen (14) days in advance of the scheduled meeting. Written requests for placing an item on the agenda must describe and summarize the item and shall be mailed or delivered to MPO, at the address in Section 2.01 (B) of these Bylaws. 2. Additional items not included on the meeting agenda may be considered at a meeting if the chairman or his designee feels that the item requires immediate action by the MPO. 2.03 EMERGENCY MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS A. The MPO may hold an emergency meeting or workshop notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 2.01 and 2.02 of these Bylaws, for the purpose of acting upon matters affecting the public healtfu safety and welfare. B. Whenever an emergency meeting or workshop is scheduled to be held, the MPO shall notiff, as soon as possible prior to the meeting, at least one major newspaper of major circulation in the Naples Area stating time, date, place and purpose of the meeting or workshop. Section 3 These Bylaws may be amended by a majority vote of tle voting memhrs, provided a copy of the proposed amendment shall have been sent to all members at least seven (7) calendar days prior to it being voted on. The MPO Board has sole authority to adopt and amend the bylaws of any advisory committee. These Bylaws and any and all amendments to the Bylaws will become effective upon endorsement of the Collier MPO. These Bylaws for the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization were hereby adopted in an open session with a quorum present and voting on May*,4020 October 9. 2020. 7 AMF],NDMENTS TO BYLAWS 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (see p5) (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management By METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Elaine Middelstaedt, MPO Chair Attested By: Anne Mclaughlin, MPO Executive Director Approved as to form and legality: COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY Scott R. Teach Deputy County Attorney 8 @)g9 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (see p5) (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management THE BYLAWSOF COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) Section I l.0l 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 Section 2 2.Ot 2.02 2.03 Description of Organization Agenda and Scheduling-Meeting and Workshops Notice of Meetings and Workshops Agenda Emergency Meetings and Workshops Section 3 Amendments to Bylaws The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization, hereinafter referred to as the MPO, is created pursuant to Florida Statute 339.175 and operates rurder an Interlocal Agreement, as amended and restated dated February 26, 2015, authorized under Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes. The parties to the interlocal agrcement are Collier County, the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island, the City of Everglades City and the Florida Department of Transportation. I.O2 COMPOSITION AND OPERATION OF THE MPO The composition and operation of the MPO shall be as provided in the aforesaid The Agency Composition and Operation of MPO Committees General lnformation on the MPO Public Access to Agency Meetings and Workshops fughts of Review Section I DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION I.OI THE AGf,NCY Creation of the MPO is for the purpose of implementing Title 23, United States Code, Section 134, and Title 49, United States Code, Sections 1602, 1603, and 1604, and Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 450, and Chapter 339.175, Florida Statutes. The MPO is created to work in cooperation with the Florida Departrnent of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration. I @ 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Committee Interlocal Agreement; the officers of the MPO and their duties, and these rules may be amended as provided by said Agreement. A. Officers - The MPO shall elect a Chairman and a Vice Chairman of the MPO at its first meeting of the calendar year. The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve for a period of one (l) year or until a successor is elected. The Chairman and Vice-Chairman shall be voting members of the MPO. B. Chairman - The Chairman of the MPO shall call and preside at all meetings of the MPO. The Vice Chairman shall serve as Chairman in the absence of the Chairman. C. Aeency Clerk - The staff of the MPO shall maintain the minutes and other records of the MPO. The minutes shall accurately reflect the proceedings of the MPO. D. Ouorum - A majority of the voting members of the MPO must be present for the MPO to conduct business. E. Rules oforder - Except as otherwise provided in these Bylaws, Roberts Rules of Order, as revised, shall be followed as to any parliamentary procedures at all meetings. F. Reconsideralion of Matters - Except for MPO approved contracts, any matter which has been voted upon by the MPO may be reconsidered as follows: (1) By a motion to reconsider made by a member who voted with the majority if such motion is made prior to the adjournment of the meeting at which the matter was voted upon. If there were no public speakers on the item, or if all of the public speakers for the item are still present in the boardroom following a success{irl motion to reconsider, the MPO may elect to rehear the matter during that meeting, or direct the MPO Executive Director to place the item on the agenda for a future meeting. In the event that there were public speakers for the item, and not all of the public speakers are still present in the boar&oom following a successfirl motion to reconsider, the MPO Executive Director shall be directed to place the item on the agenda for a future meeting. (2) By a motion to reconsider made by a member who voted with the majority if such motion is made at a regular meeting following the meeting at which the matter was voted upon, but only in accordance with the following: 2 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Committee (i) Where a mernber who voted with the majority wishes the Board to reconsider a matter after the adioumment of the meeting at which it was voted on, the member shall deliver to the MPO Executive Director a written memorandum stating that the member intends to introduce a motion to reconsider. The memorandum shall state the date of the regular meeting at which the member intends to introduce such motion, and shall be delivered to the MPO Executive Director at least six days prior to such meeting. The purpose of this requirement is to allow staff to advise the Board of the legal or other ramifi cations of reconsideration. (ii) No motion to reconsider shall be made any later than the second regular MPO meeting following the MPO Board's vote on the matter sought to be reconsidered; with the exception of where the basis for such request for reconsideration is found upon MPO's staff s presentation of newly discovered and previously unknown facts which would have been material to the MPO's consideration at the time the item was originally considered but were not known earlier despite the due diligence of MPO staff (iii) Upon adoption of a motion to reconsider, the MPO Executive Director shall place the item on an agenda not later than the second regular MPO meeting following the meeting at which the motion for reconsideration was adopted. (iv) All parties who participated by speaking, submitting registration forms or written materials at the original meeting the item was addressed by the MPO, shall be notified by the MPO Executive Director of the date of reconsideration. (v) MPO approved contracts may only be reconsidered by motion made prior to the adjoumment of the meeting at which the matter was voted upon notwithstanding the discovery of subsequent newly discovered facts. For purposes of this subsection, a contract is defined as an agreement that is legally binding and enforceable in a court of law. 1.03 COMMITTEES There are hereby created five (5) standing committees, which shall be advisory committees to the governing board of the MPO. These advisory committees are the Technical Advisory Committee, Citizens Advisory Committee, the Bicycle 3 @ 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Committee and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, the Congestion Management Committee and the Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged which shall have the following composition and duties: A. The Technical Advisorv Committee - the responsibility of the Technical Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the TAC, shall be to serve the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters regarding all modes of travel, including promoting coordination among agencies, members, and transportation planning and programming; reviewing technical sufficiency, accr.rrtrcy and completeness of appropriate studies; making priority recommendations for the transportation plan and program implementation, and providing technical analyses on other transportation planning issues. The TAC shall be composed of thirteen (13) voting members and one (l) non-voting member appointed by the divisiorl department or agency that t}tey represent. TAC voting members may designate an alternate to replace them in their absence. B. Citizens Advisory Committee - the responsibility of the Citizen Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the CAC, is to advise the MPO reviewing, reacting to, and providing comment on transPortation planning issues and needs regarding all modes of travel fiom the citizens' perspectives. The CAC shall consist of voting members appointed by the MPO. Membership shall be composed of thirteen (13) citizens residing or whose principal place ofbusiness is located in the following areas: City of Naples (2), Collier County Unincorporated Area (5), coinciding with the established Collier County Commission Districts, City of Marco Island (1), City of Everglades Crty (1), including the area encompassing Chokoloskee and Plantation Island, and; Four (4) citizens at large, including a minimum ofone (1) citizen representing the disabled or an advocate for the disabled community, one (1) minority citizen, and two (2) appointed from Collier County to ensure adequate representation from all geographic areas of the county, and to include groups having civic, commtrnity and economic interests. C and Pedestrian Ad Comm - The responsibility of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the BPAC, is to provide citizen input into the deliberation of bicycle- and 4 @ 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Committee pedestrian-related issues within the community, to advise the MPO on developing a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) that is responsive to the needs of the community, to recommend policies and advise the MPO Board of opportunities that will improve the walking and bicycling environment, recommend priorities for bicycle and pedestrian projects and program implementation, and contribute to the BPMP's vision and recommendations regarding the development of the bicycle and pedestrian network. Membership shall be composed of twelve (12) at-large voting members representing a wide cross-section of Collier County residents and neighborhoods, bicycle and pedestrian safety professionals, Safe Routes to Schools organizations, transit riders, local bicycle and pedestrian advocacy groups, organizations that encouage active transportation from a community health perspective, and advocates for persons with disabilities, and other transportation disadvantaged populations. D. The Coneestion t Committee the responsibility of the Congestion Management Committee, hereinafter referred to as the CMC, shall be to serve the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters relating to the update of the MPO's Congestion Management Process (CMP) and the coordination of the CMP with regional Congestion Management System and Intelligent Transportation System architecture. The CMC shall be composed of eleven (l l) voting members appointed by the division, departrnent or agency that they represent. CMC voting members may designate an altemate to replace them in their absence. E. The Local Coordinatine Board for the Transnortation Disadvantased - the responsibility of the Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged, hereinafter referred to as the LCB, shall be to assist the MPO in identifuing local service needs and providing information, advice and direction to the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) on the coordination of services to be provided to the transportation disadvantaged pursuant to Chapter 427.0157, Florida Statutes. In accordance with Rule 41-2.012, Florida Administration Code, all members of the LCB shall be appointed by the designated official planning agency. The designated oflicial planning agency for Collier County is the MPO. The LCB shall be composed of sixteen (16) voting members appointed by the division, department, or agency that they represent. LCB voting memben may designate an altemate to replace them in their absence. 5 @ 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Committee 1.04 GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE MPO All public records of the MPO, TAC, CAC, BPAC, LCB and CMC Committee are open for inspection and examination at the office of the MPO, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. during regular business days. 1.05 PUBLIC ACCESS TO MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS All MPO, TAC, CAC, BPAC, LCB and CMC meetings, workshops and proceedings shall be open to the public. All parties to the Interlocal Agreement, as well as the FHWA and FTA shall have the rights of technical review and comment of MPO projects. Section 2 AGENDA. SCHE DULING and MEETINGS A. Except in the case of emergency meetings or workshops, the MPO shall give at least seven (7) days public notice of any meeting or workshop through the issuance of a prcss release to local print and broadcast media in the Naples Area B. The press release notice of such meeting or workshop shall provide: l. The date, time, and place of the event. 2. A brief description ofthe purpose ofthe event. 3. The address where interested parties may write to obtain a copy of the agenda. A copy of the Agenda may be obtained by writing to the Collier MPO, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Agendas may also be obtained by e-mail at collie rmpoi(r collicrqor'.nct or by accessing the MPO's Web site at colliermpo.net. 2.02 AGENDA A. At least seven (7) days prior to a meeting or workshop, the MPO staff shall prepare and make available an agenda for distribution on request by any interested person. The agenda shall list the items in the order they are to be considered; provided, however, that for good cause stated in the 6 1.06 RIGHTS OF REVIEW 2.OI NOTICE OF MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS @ 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Committee record by the person who is designated to preside at the meeting, items may be considered out oftheir listed order. B. The agenda shall be specific as to the items to be considered. All matten shall be listed on the agenda. 1. Any person who desires to have an item placed on the agenda of the meeting of the MPO shall request in writing that the item be considered at the next scheduled meeting of the MPO, provided, however, that such a request must be received fourteen (14) days in advance of the scheduled meeting. Written requests for placing an item on the agenda must describe and summarize the item and shall be mailed or delivered to MPO, at the address in Section 2.01 (B) of these Bylaws. 2. Additional items not included on the meeting agenda may be considered at a meeting if the chairman or his designee feels that the item requires immediate action by the MPO. A. The MPO may hold an emergency meeting or workshop notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 2.01 and 2.02 ofthese Bylaws, for the purpose of acting upon matters affecting the public health, safety and welfare. B. Whenever an emergency meeting or workshop is scheduled to be held, the MPO shall notifu, as soon as possible prior to the meeting, at least one major newspaper of major circulation in the Naples Area stating time, date, place and purpose of the meeting or workshop. AMF],NDMENTS TO BYLAW S These Bylaws may be amended by a majority vote of the voting members, provided a copy of the proposed amendment shall have been sent to all members at least seven (7) calendar days prior to it being voted on. The MPO Board has sole authority to adopt and amend the bylaws of any advisory committee. These Bylaws and any and all amendments to the Bylaws will become effective upon endorsement of the Collier MPO. These Bylaws for the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization were hereby adopted in an open session with a quorum presenl and voting on May$;2020 October 9. 2020. 7 2.03 EMERGENCY MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS Section 3 @ 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Committee By: METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Elaine Middelstaedt, MPO Char Attested Bv: Anne Mclaughlin, MPO Executive Director Approved as to form and legality: COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY By: Scott R. Teach Deputy County Attomey 8 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Bylaw Amendment as Clean Copy (14169 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Committee 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws OBJECTIVE: To review and approve the updated LCB bylaws. CONSIDERATIONS: The Local Coordinating Board (LCB) is required to review and approve its bylaws annually. Governor DeSantis Executive Order 20-69, which suspended requirements for local government bodies, including LCBs, to hold a quorum in-person or meet in a specific public place in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency expired on November 1, 2020. The Florida Transportation Disadvantaged Commission has advised that LCBs may wish to reduce their in-person quorum through the COVID-19 pandemic. MPO staff contacted LCB members about their current ability to attend in person meetings. This resulted in the revision of Section 3 of the LCB bylaws reducing the number of LCB members needed in attendance to create an in-person quorum from seven (7) to four (4). The proposed changes are included in Attachment 1 in strikethrough/underline format. Clean version of the updated bylaws is included as Attachment 2. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LCB voted unanimously to approve the amendment to its bylaws at its meeting on October 28, 2020. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: For the Board to review and approve the updated LCB bylaws. Prepared By: Josephine Medina, Collier MPO Senior Planner ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Strikethrough and underline version (PDF) 2. Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Clean version (PDF) 9.C Packet Pg. 69 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 9.C Doc ID: 14170 Item Summary: Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 1:09 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 1:09 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:25 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:31 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 9.C Packet Pg. 70 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Strikethrough and underline version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Strikethrough and underline version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Strikethrough and underline version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Strikethrough and underline version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Strikethrough and underline version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Strikethrough and underline version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Strikethrough and underline version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Strikethrough and underline version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Strikethrough and underline version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Strikethrough and underline version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Strikethrough and underline version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.2 Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Clean version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.2 Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Clean version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.2 Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Clean version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.2 Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Clean version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.2 Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Clean version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.2 Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Clean version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.2 Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Clean version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.2 Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Clean version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.2 Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Clean version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.2 Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Clean version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 9.C.2 Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Draft 2020 LCB Bylaws – Clean version (14170 : Review and Approval of updated LCB Bylaws) 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Appointment of Local Coordinating Board Chairperson OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to appoint a Local Coordinating Board (LCB) Chairperson. CONSIDERATIONS: The purpose of the Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board (LCB) is to assist in identifying local service needs and providing information, advising and directing the Community Transportation Coordinator (Collier County Board of County Commissioners) on the coordination services being provided to the people in Collier County for the transportation disadvantaged. The LCB is comprised of various agencies and groups as well as citizens, appointed by the MPO Board and shall be consistent with Rule 41-2.012, F.A.C (Attachment 1). Regarding LCB Chairperson appointment the rule states “The Metropolitan Planning Organization or Designated Official Planning Agency shall appoint one elected official to serve as the official chairperson for all Coordinating Board meetings. The appointed chairperson shall be an elected official from the county that the Coordinating Board serves.” The appointed Chairperson will serve until elected term of office has expired or otherwise replaced by the MPO Board. With Commissioner Fiala retiring a new LCB Chairperson is needed to be appointed by th e MPO Board. LCB Board usually meets quarterly on the first Wednesday of the month at 1:30 PM. The next meeting date is scheduled for December 2, 2020 at 1:30 PM at the Board of County Commissioners Chambers. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/a STAFF RECOMMENDATION: For the Board to appoint a Local Coordinating Board (LCB) Chairperson. Prepared by: Josephine Medina, Senior Planner ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Rule 41-2.012, F.A.C. (PDF) 9.D Packet Pg. 93 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 9.D Doc ID: 14178 Item Summary: Appointment of Local Coordinating Board Chairperson Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 2:20 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 2:20 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/05/2020 11:30 AM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/05/2020 11:32 AM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 9.D Packet Pg. 94 41-2.012 Coordinating Board Structure and Duties. The purpose of the Coordinating Board is to identify local service needs and to provide information, advice, and direction to the Community Transportation Coordinator on the coordination of services to be provided to the transportation disadvantaged through the Florida Coordinated Transportation System (FCTS). Each Coordinating Board is recognized as an advisory body to the Commission in its service area. The members of the Coordinating Board shall be appointed by the Metropolitan Planning Organization or the Designated Official Planning Agency. A Coordinating Board shall be appointed in each county. However, when agreed upon in writing, by all Boards of County Commissions in each county to be covered in the service area, multi-county Coordinating Boards may be appointed. The structure and duties of the Coordinating Board shall be as follows: (1) The Metropolitan Planning Organization or Designated Official Planning Agency shall appoint one elected official to serve as the official chairperson for all Coordinating Board meetings. The appointed chairperson shall be an elected official from the county that the Coordinating Board serves. For a multi-county Coordinating Board, the elected official appointed to serve as Chairperson shall be from one of the counties involved. (2) The Coordinating Board shall hold an organizational meeting each year for the purpose of electing a Vice-Chairperson. The Vice-Chairperson shall be elected by a majority vote of a quorum of the members of the Coordinating Board present and voting at the organizational meeting. The Vice-Chairperson shall serve a term of one year starting with the next meeting. In the event of the Chairperson’s absence, the Vice-Chairperson shall assume the duties of the Chairperson and conduct the meeting. (3) In addition to the Chairperson, except for multi-county Coordinating Boards which shall have as a representative an elected official from each county, including the Chairperson, one of whom shall be elected Vice-Chairperson, the following agencies or groups shall be represented on the Coordinating Board, in every county as voting members: (a) A local representative of the Florida Department of Transportation; (b) A local representative of the Florida Department of Children and Family Services; (c) A local representative of the Public Education Community which could include, but not be limited to, a representative of the District School Board, School Board Transportation Office, or Headstart Program in areas where the School District is responsible; (d) In areas where they exist, a local representative of the Florida Division of Vocational Rehabilitation or the Division of Blind Services, representing the Department of Education; (e) A person recommended by the local Veterans Service Office representing the veterans of the county; (f) A person who is recognized by the Florida Association for Community Action (President), representing the economically disadvantaged in the county; (g) A person over sixty representing the elderly in the county; (h) A person with a disability representing the disabled in the county; (i) Two citizen advocate representatives in the county; one who must be a person who uses the transportation service(s) of th e system as their primary means of transportation; (j) A local representative for children at risk; (k) In areas where they exist, the Chairperson or designee of the local Mass Transit or Public Transit System’s Board, except in cases where they are also the Community Transportation Coordinator; (l) A local representative of the Florida Department of Elderly Affairs; (m) An experienced representative of the local private for profit transportation industry. In areas where such representative is not available, a local private non-profit representative will be appointed, except where said representative is also the Community Transportation Coordinator; (n) A local representative of the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration; (o) A local representative of the Agency for Persons with Disabilities; (p) A representative of the Regional Workforce Development Board established in chapter 445, F.S.; and (q) A representative of the local medical community, which may include, but not be limited to, kidney dialysis centers, long term care facilities, assisted living facilities, hospitals, local health department or other home and community based services, etc. (4) Except for the Chairperson, the non-agency members of the Board shall be appointed for three year staggered terms with initial membership being appointed equally for one, two, and three years. The Chairperson shall serve until elected term of office has expired or otherwise replaced by the Designated Official Planning Agency. No employee of a community transportation coordinator shall serve as a voting member of the coordinating board in an area where the community transportation coordinator serves. However, community transportation coordinators and their employees are not prohibited from serving on a coordinating board in an 9.D.1 Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Rule 41-2.012, F.A.C. (14178 : Appointment of Local Coordinating Board Chairperson) area where they are not the coordinator. However, an elected official serving as Chairperson of the coordinating board, or other governmental employees that are not employed for the purpose of making provisions for transportation and are not directly supervised by the community transportation coordinator shall not be precluded from serving as voting members of the coordinating board. (5) The Board shall meet at least quarterly and shall perform the following duties in addition to those duties specifically listed in section 427.0157, F.S.: (a) Maintain official meeting minutes, including an attendance roster, reflecting official actions and provide a copy of same to the Commission and the Chairperson of the designated official planning agency. (b) Annually, provide the Metropolitan Planning Organization or Designated Official Planning Agency with an evaluation of the Community Transportation Coordinator’s performance in general and relative to Commission and local standards as referenced in rule 41-2.006, F.A.C., and the performance results of the most recent Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan. As part of the Coordinator’s performance, the local Coordinating Board shall also set an annual percentage goal increase for the number of trips provided within the system for ridership on public transit, where applicable. In areas where the public transit is not being utilized, the local Coordinating Board shall set an annual percentage of the number of trips to be provided on public transit. The Commission shall provide evaluation criteria for the local Coordinating Board to use relative to the performance of the Community Transportation Coordinator. This evaluation will be submitted to the Commission upon approval by the local coordinating board. (c) Appoint a Grievance Committee to process and investigate complaints, from agencies, users, transportation operators, potential users of the system and the Community Transportation Coordinator in the designated service area, and make recommendations to the Coordinating Board or to the Commission, when local resolution cannot be found, for improvement of service. The Coordinating Board shall establish a process and procedures to provide regular opportunities for issues to be brought before such committee and to address them in a timely manner. Rider brochures or other documents provided to users or potential users of the system shall provide information about the complaint and grievance process including the publishing of the Commission’s TD Helpline service when local resolution has not occurred. All materials shall be made available in accessible format, upon request by the citizen. Members appointed to the committee shall be voting members of the Coordinating Board. (d) All coordinating board members should be trained on and comply with the requirements of section 112.3143, F.S., concerning voting conflicts of interest. Rulemaking Authority 427.013(9) FS. Law Implemented 427.0157 FS. History–New 5-2-90, Amended 6-17-92, 11-16-93, 1-4-94, 7-11-95, 5-1-96, 10-1-96, 3-10-98, 4-8-01, 12-17-02, 7-3-03, 6-14-18. 9.D.1 Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Rule 41-2.012, F.A.C. (14178 : Appointment of Local Coordinating Board Chairperson) 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of Request for Professional Services (“RPS”) No. 18-7432-MP, “Professional Services Library - Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category,” and authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the top five ranked firms, so that proposed agreements may be brought back for the Board’s consideration at a subsequent meeting. OBJECTIVE: To obtain approval of the selection committee’s ranking of consultants so that staff can negotiate contracts pertaining to professional services to be used by the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (“MPO”) to facilitate projects for operations and capital project implementation. CONSIDERATIONS: This RPS sought consultants willing to enter into professional service contracts to provide small supplemental engineering services for Collier County MPO projects. The eventual contracts sought to be issued under this RPS will be used for professional services on projects th at are no greater than $500,000, and where any related construction project is valued under four million dollars, or the maximum amount allowable by law. With the assistance of operating staff, the Procurement Services Division developed a solicitation for these services consistent with Florida’s Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act, Section 287.055, Florida Statutes (the “CCNA”). On July 6, 2020, the Procurement Services Division released notices of Request for Professional Services 18-7432-MP, Professional Services Library - Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category on behalf of the MPO. Staff notified 21,713 firms, 156 firms viewed/downloaded the solicitation information, and the County received ten (10) proposals by the August 6, 20 20 due date. Staff determined all ten firms to be responsive and responsible. A Selection Committee met on September 30, 2020 and scored each of the proposals and ranked the firms as listed below. Company Name Final Ranking Tindale-Oliver & Associates Inc. d/b/a Tindale Oliver 1 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 2 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 3 Capital Consulting Solutions LLC 4 T.Y. Lin International 5 The Corradino Group Inc. 6 ADEAS-Q, LLC 7 Caltran Engineering Group, Inc. 8 Kisinger Campo & Associates Corp. d/b/a KCA 9 Toole Design Group LLC 10 The selection committee determined that five (5) firms are sufficient to address the volume of work that will arise under this agreement. In accordance with the CCNA, staff is seeking MPO Board direction to begin negotiations with the top five ranked firms: (1) Tindale-Oliver & Associates Inc. d/b/a Tindale Oliver, (2) Stantec Consulting Services Inc., (3) Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., (4) Capital Consulting Solutions LLC, and (5) T.Y. Lin International. Proposed contracts will be brought back for the Board’s consideration at a subsequent meeting. 9.E Packet Pg. 97 11/13/2020 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: This is a contractual matter and did not require committee approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the selection committee’s ranking of Request for Professional Services No. 18-7432-MP, “Professional Services Library - Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category,” and authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the top five (5) ranked firms, so that proposed agreements can be brought back for the MPO Board’s consideration at a subsequent meeting. Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Principal Planner ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Notice of Recommended Award (PDF) 2. Final Ranking (PDF) 3. Solicitation (PDF) 4. Tindale Oliver Proposal (PDF) 5. Stantec Proposal (PDF) 6. Jacobs Proposal (PDF) 7. Capital Consulting Proposal (PDF) 8. TY Lin Proposal (PDF) 9.E Packet Pg. 98 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 9.E Doc ID: 14171 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of Request for Professional Services (“RPS”) No. 18-7432-MP, “Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category,” and authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the top five ranked firms, so that proposed agreements may be brought back for the Board’s consideration at a subsequent meeting. Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 1:33 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 1:33 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:00 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:05 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 9.E Packet Pg. 99 Date: October 8, 2020 Notice of Recommended Award Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Title: Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category Due Date and Time: August 6, 2020 at 3:00 PM Respondents: Company Name City County State Final Ranking Responsive/Responsible Tindale-Oliver & Associates Inc. d/b/a Tindale Oliver Tampa Hillsborough FL 1 Yes/Yes Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Naples Collier FL 2 Yes/Yes Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Naples Collier FL 3 Yes/Yes Capital Consulting Solutions LLC Naples Collier FL 4 Yes/Yes T.Y. Lin International Fort Myers Lee FL 5 Yes/Yes The Corradino Group Inc. Miami Miami-Dade FL 6 Yes/Yes ADEAS-Q, LLC Tampa Hillsborough FL 7 Yes/Yes Caltran Engineering Group, Inc. Miami Miami-Dade FL 8 Yes/Yes Kisinger Campo & Associates Corp. d/b/a KCA Tampa Hillsborough FL 9 Yes/Yes Toole Design Group LLC Orlando Orange FL 10 Yes/Yes Utilized Local Vendor Preference: Yes No Recommended Vendor(s) For Award: On July 6, 2020, the Procurement Services Division released notices of Request for Professional Services 18- 7432-MP, Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category on behalf of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. 21,713 firms were notified, 156 firms viewed/downloaded the solicitation information, and ten (10) proposals were received by the due date of August 6, 2020, as shown above. All ten proposers were found to be responsive/responsible. Caltran Engineering Group, Inc. was contacted for missing grant certifications and assurances and deemed a minor irregularity. The Selection Committee met on September 30, 2020 and as described in the solicitation documents, the Committee scored each of the proposals and ranked as listed above. The top five (5) firms are being recommended for award and negotiations: Tindale-Oliver & Associates Inc. d/b/a Tindale Oliver ranked as 1 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. ranked as 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 4A29F8A5-D40F-4EC8-8BC6-CA49C0919A7B 9.E.1 Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Notice of Recommended Award (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. ranked as 3 Capital Consulting Solutions LLC ranked as 4 T.Y. Lin International ranked as 5 The final ranking resulted in a tie between ADEAS-Q, LLC and Caltran Engineering Group, Inc. Pursuant to the solicitation documents and the Collier County Procurement Manual, the tie was resolved. Required Signatures Project Manager: Procurement Strategist: Procurement Services Director: __________________________________ _________________ Sandra Herrera Date DocuSign Envelope ID: 4A29F8A5-D40F-4EC8-8BC6-CA49C0919A7B 10/8/2020 10/12/2020 10/12/2020 9.E.1 Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Notice of Recommended Award (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Selection Committee Scoring Sheet and Final Ranking RPS #: 18-7432-MP Title: Professional Services Library - Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category Name of Firm Trinity Scott Brandy Otero Kyle Kemmish Zachary Karto Jecika Cook Total Scores Selection Committee Final Rank Tindale-Oliver & Associates Inc. d/b/a Tindale Oliver 99 99 100 94 93 485.00 1 Stantec Consulting Services Inc.100 95 88 95 91 469.00 2 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.84 93 88 92 96 453.00 3 Capital Consulting Solutions 75 83 85 91 94 428.00 4 T.Y. Lin International 89 94 60 97 87 427.00 5 The Corradino Group Inc.79 90 70 94 85 418.00 6 ADEAS-Q, LLC 83 92 55 96 83 409.00 7 Caltran Engineering Group, Inc.82 86 65 92 84 409.00 8 Kisinger Campo & Associates Corp. d/b/a KCA 70 87 70 96 82 405.00 9 Toole Design Group LLC 65 91 60 97 86 399.00 10 Procurement Professional Evelyn Colon Procurement Manager September 30, 2020 Page 1 of 1 9.E.2 Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Final Ranking (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (RPS) In accordance with Florida Statute 287.055 Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIBRARY METROPOLITAN PLANNING GENERAL PLANNING SERVICES CATEGORY RPS NO.: 18-7432-MP EVELYN COLON, PROCUREMENT STRATEGIST PROCUREMENT SERVICES DIVISION 3295 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, BLDG C-2 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 TELEPHONE: (239) 252-2667 Evelyn.Colon@colliercountyfl.gov (Email) This proposal solicitation document is prepared in a Microsoft Word format (rev 8/16/17). Any alterations to this document made by the Consultant may be grounds for rejection of proposal, cancellation of any subsequent award, or any other legal remedies available to the Collier County Government. 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Solicitation (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) SOLICITATION PUBLIC NOTICE REQUEST FOR PROFESSINAL SERVICES (RPS) NUMBER: 18-7432-MP PROJECT TITLE: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIBRARY: METROPOLITAN PLANNING GENERAL PLANNING SERVICES CATEGORY RPS OPENING DAY/DATE/TIME: AUGUST 6, 2019 AT 3:00PM AUGUST 6, 2020 AT 3:00PM PLACE OF RPS OPENING: PROCUREMENT SERVICES DIVISION 3295 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, BLDG C-2 NAPLES, FL 34112 All proposals shall be submitted online via the Collier County Procurement Services Division Online Bidding System: https://www.bidsync.com/bidsync-cas/ INTRODUCTION As requested by the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (hereinafter, the “Division or Department”), the Collier County Board of County Commissioners Procurement Services Division (hereinafter, “County”) has issued this Request for Professional Services (hereinafter, “RPS”) with the intent of obtaining proposals from interested and qualified Consultants in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications stated or attached. The Consultant, at a minimum, must achieve the requirements of the Specifications or Scope of Work stated. The results of this solicitation may be used by other County departments once awarded according to the Board of County Commissioners Procurement Ordinance, as amended. The purpose of this solicitation is to acquire multiple qualified firm(s) to provide engineering services on an as needed basis in the METROPOLITAN PLANNING GENERAL PLANNING SERVICES CATEGORY. Historically, County departments have spent approximately $574,603.18 over the previous 4 year period; however, this may not be indicative of future buying patterns. BACKGROUND The Collier County Board of County Commissioners, in compliance with Florida Statute 287.055, Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act, is seeking proposals from qualified and experienced engineering firms to perform continuing professional services, under the METROPOLITAN PLANNING GENERAL PLANNING SERVICES CATEGORY of the County’s Professional Services Library. All work awarded under this contract will be for projects in which the estimated construction cost of each individual project does not exceed $4 million, and professional services for each individual project does not exceed $500,000. All work will be performed in accordance with industry standards and comply with applicable laws, and regulations. TERM OF CONTRACT The contract term, if awards are made, is intended to be for one (1) five (5) year term with a single one (1) year renewal option at the sole discretion of the County. Surcharges will not be accepted in conjunction with this contract, and such charges should be incorporated into the pricing structure. The County Manager, or designee, may, at his discretion, extend the Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement for up to one hundred eighty (180) days. The County Manager, or designee, shall give the Contractor written notice of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior to the end of the Agreement term then in effect. DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK The Successful firms shall be required to work in close cooperation/coordination with Collier County staff. Work orders will be assigned on an as needed basis, and may include but not limited to the following types of professional services in the Metropolitan Planning services field: 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Solicitation (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) • Safety and Security Planning • Policy Planning • Systems Planning • Sub-Area / Corridor Planning • Transportation Statistics, including traffic statistics and traffic data collection • Transit Planning • Transportation Disadvantaged Planning • Short and Long Range Planning • Assistance with various surface transportation plans and programs including highway, transit, transportation disadvantaged, congestion management, pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Specific work tasks or scopes of work may be issued for: • Community Impact Assessment • Safety And Security Planning • Preparation of Corridor Studies • Traffic Modeling • Traffic Data Collection Services • Access Management Studies • Environmental Data Collection and Analysis • Data Collection and Analysis • Traffic Operations Analysis Studies • Preparation of Long Range Transportation Plan • Preparation of Public Participation Plan Updates • Freight Planning • Regional Planning including hosting regional summits • Preparation of Annual Report • Level of Service Analysis and Mapping • Long Range Transportation Planning to include modeling assistance • Mapping and Graphics Production • Preparation of Powerpoint and Video Presentations • Transit Planning • Bicycle / Pedestrian Facilities Planning and Design including preparation of updates to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan • Congestion Management Analysis including Project Identification, Monitoring and Evaluation, Preparation of Congestion Management Process Updates • Transportation Safety Planning, Data Gathering and Analysis • Support Staff at Public Meetings • Public involvement assistance including website development, preparation of hard copy and electronic newsletters,, on-line surveys, interactive maps, informational videos and Public Service Announcements, and other educational and informational materials, as necessary • Develop project information, including community impacts and input into the Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) process • Evaluate potential Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) applications • Review of Project Development & Environment studies • Developing Project Cost Estimates • Provide administrative support to the MPO • Transportation Disadvantaged Planning • Project Management Oversight • GIS services • Reporting, analysis and planning related to Automated, Connected, Autonomous Vehicles and Ride-Hailing Services • Reporting, analysis, mapping and planning related to climate change, sea level rise, coastal resiliency, extreme weather phenomena and transportation infrastructure resiliency • Analysis and reporting on socio-economic data and trends and travel behavior • Origin/Destination studies 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Solicitation (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) • Reporting and compliance with Federal Performance measures, including project review, analysis, and monitoring DISTRIBUTION OF WORK Professional Services Library Rotation 1. Work assignments within each service category are awarded on a rotational basis by the Procurement Division. 2. For each service category, the Procurement Division will place qualifying firms in the Professional Services Library in the order they are ranked, with the highest scoring firm placed in the first position in the rotation. 3. As each work assignment is identified the next firm in the rotation will be offered the opportunity to negotiate that work assignment with the County’s Administrative Agent. 4. Should a firm decline a work assignment or be unable to reach a satisfactory fee negotiation with the County within a reasonable time frame, the County will contact the next firm on the list until the work assignment is successfully negotiated. 5. Firms will have the option of rejecting one work assignment within each service category within a twelve (12) month period without penalty. A second work assignment rejection within any twelve (12) month period will cause the firm to be skipped in the rotation. A firm who rejects three (3) work assignments (or is unable to satisfactorily negotiate 3 work assignments) in any twelve (12) month period may be removed from the service category at the direction of the Procurement Services Division Director. 6. Firms wishing to reject a work assignment for any reason must complete a Work Assignment Rejection Notification Form. A copy of this completed form must be provided to the Procurement Division by the County’s Administrative Agent. 7. Once a full rotation through all firms in a service category is complete, a method that attempts to impart an equitable distribution of work among selected firms will be based on prior dollars awarded; with the firm having received the least amount of dollars being considered for the next work assignment. Professional Services Library - Direct Selection For work assignments requiring unique experience or knowledge, including past experience on another phase of the project, the County project manager may formally request permission to forego the rotation and select a specific firm. This request will require the completion of a Work Assignment Direct Select Form, which requires the approval of both a Division Director and the Procurement Services Director. Firms that are directly selected for a work assignment as a result of this process shall be passed on their next scheduled turn in the rotation. REQUEST FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (RPS) LIBRARY PROCESS 1.1 The selection process will involve a qualifications-based proposal review in order to qualify a library of consulting firms to perform various County projects. The consulting firms will submit a qualifications proposal, based on the criteria detailed below (Response Format and Scoring Criteria for Development of Shortlist), which will be the basis for scoring, ranking, and determining the number of firms that will be awarded. The consulting firms will need to meet the minimum requirements outlined in order for their proposal to be evaluated and scored by the COUNTY. The COUNTY will then produce a final ranking for approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Upon approval, the County will enter into negotiations with the selected firms. With successful negotiations, contracts will be developed with the selected firms, and subsequent individual work orders issued based on the distribution of work explained above. 1.2 The COUNTY will use a Selection Committee in the RPS selection process. 1.3 The intent of the scoring of the qualifications proposal, is for consultants to indicate their interest, relevant experience, financial capability, staffing and organizational structure. 1.4 Based upon a review of these qualification proposals, the firms will be scored, ranked, and recommended for award to the Board of County Commissioners. 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Solicitation (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 1.5 Once the award recommendation is approved, the COUNTY will enter into negotiations with the awarded firms. Upon successful negations, the firms will be assigned to the Professional Services Library. RESPONSE FORMAT AND SCORING CRITERIA FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SHORTLIST: 1.6 This evaluation criterion will be utilized by the COUNTY’S Selection Committee to score each proposal. Consultants are encouraged to keep their proposals concise and to include a minimum of marketing materials. Proposals must address the following criteria: STEP 1 Evaluation Criteria Maximum Points 1. Ability of Professional Personnel 35 Points 2. Past Performance 35 Points 3. Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm 30 Points TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 100 Points Tie Breaker: In the event of a tie at final ranking, award shall be made to the proposer with the lower volume of work previously awarded. Volume of work shall be calculated based upon total dollars paid to the proposer in the twenty-four (24) months prior to the RFP submittal deadline. Payment information will be retrieved from the County’s financial system of record. The tie breaking procedure is only applied in the final ranking step of the selection process. In the event a tie still exists, selection will be determined based on random selection by the Procurement Services Director before at least three (3) witnesses. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Each criterion and methodology for scoring is further described below. ***Proposals must be assembled, at minimum, in the order of the Response Format and Scoring Criteria listed or your proposal may be deemed non-responsive*** EVALUATION CRITERIA NO. 1: ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL (35 Total Points Available) This criterion measures the ability of professional team personnel as shown by their level of experience on projects of similar type, size and complexity. This criterion measures how well the team is staffed to address all facets of the project. It measures how well the team is organized to deliver the project for the COUNTY. Preference will be given to teams with knowledge and experience with local construction and regulatory conditions and who demonstrate a strong commitment to team collaboration proximate to the project site. Preference will also be given to teams (both individual within the teams and the companies making up the team) that have worked together on successful delivery of similar projects. It measures the overall level of the team’s qualifications to successfully complete the project. EVALUATION CRITERIA NO. 2: PAST PERFORMANCE (35 Total Points Available) This criterion measures the professional team’s past experience with projects similar in size, type and complexity as this project. The professional teams will be evaluated on their TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, DESIGN AND/OR STUDY CATEGORY projects, including the experience the team members proposed on this project have together on the previous projects presented. Experience with all elements of the project scope as generally described herein will be evaluated, with specific emphasis on experience addressing the technical, community and project delivery categories. The professional team’s minimization of change orders will be an important consideration. Preference will be given to TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, DESIGN AND/OR STUDY CATEGORY constructed within the last five (5) years in proximity to the proposed project. The County requests that the vendor submits no fewer than three (3) and no more than ten (10) completed reference forms from clients whose projects are of a similar nature to this solicitation as a part of their proposal. Provide information on the projects completed by the Proposer that best represent projects of similar size, scope and complexity of this project using the REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE provided. Proposer may include two (2) additional pages for each project to illustrate aspects of the completed project that provides information to assess the experience of the Proposer on relevant project work. EVALUATION CRITERIA NO. 3: RECENT, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WORKLOADS OF THE FIRM (30 Total Points Available) This criterion measures the team’s proposed resources for the project and their availability to complete all elements of this project with regards to the closeout of recent work, current workload, and projected projects that could impact the completion 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Solicitation (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) of this project. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS 1. QUESTIONS 1.1 Direct questions related to this RPS to the Collier County Procurement Services Division Online Bidding System website: https://www.bidsync.com/bidsync-cas/. 1.2 Consultants must clearly understand that the only official answer or position of the County will be the one stated on the Collier County Procurement Services Division Online Bidding System website. For general questions, please call the referenced Procurement Strategist noted on the cover page. 2. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE (If Applicable) 2.1 The purpose of the pre-proposal conference is to allow an open forum for discussion and questioning with County staff regarding the RPS with all prospective Consultants having an equal opportunity to hear and participate. Oral questions will receive oral responses, neither of which will be official, nor become part of the RPS. Only written responses to written questions will be considered official, and will be included as part of the RPS as an addendum. 2.2 All prospective Consultants are strongly encouraged to attend, as, this will usually be the only pre-proposal conference for this solicitation. If this pre-proposal conference is denoted as “mandatory”, prospective Consultants must be present in order to submit a proposal response. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH THE RPS Proposals must be in strict compliance with this RPS. Failure to comply with all provisions of the RPS may result in disqualification. 4. AMBIGUITY, CONFLICT, OR OTHER ERRORS IN THE RPS It is the sole responsibility of the Consultant if the Consultant discovers any ambiguity, conflict, discrepancy, omission or other error in the RPS, to immediately notify the Procurement Strategist, noted herein, of such error in writing and request modification or clarification of the document prior to submitting the proposal. The Procurement Strategist will make modifications by issuing a written revision and will give written notice to all parties who have received this RPS from the Procurement Services Division. 5. PROPOSALS, PRESENTATIONS, AND PROTEST COSTS The County will not be liable in any way for any costs incurred by any Consultant in the preparation of its proposal in response to this RPS, nor for the presentation of its proposal and/or participation in any discussions, negotiations, or, if applicable, any protest procedures. 6. DELIVERY OF PROPOSALS 6.1 All proposals are to be submitted by the due date and Naples local time, on the Collier County Procurement Services Division Online Bidding System website: https://www.bidsync.com/bidsync-cas/. 6.2 The County does not bear the responsibility for proposals delivered to the Procurement Services Division past the stated date and/or time indicated. 7. VALIDITY OF PROPOSALS 7.1 No proposal can be withdrawn after it is opened unless the Consultant makes their request in writing to the County. All proposals shall be valid for a period of one hundred eighty (180) days from the submission date to accommodate evaluation and selection process. 8. METHOD OF SOURCE SELECTION 8.1 The County is using the Competitive Sealed Proposals methodology of source selection for this procurement, as authorized by Ordinance Number 2017-08, establishing and adopting the Collier County Procurement Ordinance. 8.2 If the County receives proposals from less than three (3) firms, the Procurement Director shall review all the facts and determine if it is in the best interest of the County to solicit additional proposals or request that the Selection Committee rank order the received proposals. 9. EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS 9.1 Collier County will evaluate the proposals and select the firm in accordance with Florida Statute 287.055, Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA). 9.2 The County’s procedure for selecting is as follows: 9.2.1 The Procurement Services Director shall appoint a selection committee to review all proposals submitted. 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Solicitation (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.2.2 The Request for Professional Services is issued. 9.2.3 Subsequent to the receipt closing date for the proposals, the Procurement professional will review the proposals received and verify each proposal to determine if it minimally responds to the requirements of the published RPS. 9.2.4 Selection committee meetings will be open to the public and publicly noticed by the Procurement Services Division. 9.2.5 In an initial organization meeting, the selection committee members will receive instructions, the submitted proposals, and establish the next selection committee meeting date and time. After the first meeting, the Procurement professional will publicly announce all subsequent committee meeting dates and times. The subsequent meeting dates and times will be posted with at least one (1) day advanced notice. 9.2.6 Selection committee members will independently review and score each proposal based on the evaluation criteria stated in the Request for Professional Services using the Individual Selection Committee Score and Rank Form and prepare comments for discussion at the next meeting. The Individual Selection Committee Score and Rank Form is merely a tool to assist the selection committee member in their review of the proposals. 9.2.7 At the publicly noticed selection committee meeting, the members will present their independent findings / conclusions / comments based on their reading and interpretation of the materials presented to each other, and may ask questions of one another. Time will be allowed for public comment. 9.2.8 Collier County selection committee members may consider all the material submitted by the Proposer and other information Collier County may obtain to determine whether the Proposer is capable of and has a history of successfully completing projects of this type, including, without limitation, additional information Collier County may request, clarification of proposer information, and/or additional credit information. 9.2.9 Once the individual scoring has been completed, the Procurement professional will read the results publicly. The selection committee may ask for additional information, present materials, interview, ask questions, etc. The members may consider any and all information obtained through this method in formulating their final ranking. 9.2.10 The selection committee’s overall rank of firms in order of preference (from highest beginning with a rank of one (1) to the lowest) will be discussed and reviewed by the Procurement Professional. By having used all information presented (proposal, presentation, references, etc.), the selection committee members will create a final ranking and staff will subsequently enter into negotiations. 9.3 The County reserves the right to withdraw this RPS at any time and for any reason, and to issue such clarifications, modifications, addendums, and/or amendments as it may deem appropriate, including, but not limited, to requesting supplemental proposal information. 9.4 Receipt of a proposal by the County offers no rights upon the Consultant nor obligates the County in any manner. 9.5 Acceptance of the proposal does not guarantee issuance of any other governmental approvals. 10. REFERENCES The County reserves the right to contact any and all references submitted as a result of this solicitation. 11. RESERVED RIGHTS Collier County reserves its right in any solicitation to accept or reject any or all bids, proposals or offers; to waive minor irregularities and technicalities; or to request resubmission. Also, Collier County reserves the right to accept all or any part of any bid, proposal, or offer, and to increase or decrease quantities to meet the additional or reduced requirements of Collier County. Collier County reserves its right to cancel, extend or modify any or all bids, proposals or offers; to award to one or more vendors; to award all or part of a solicitation; and to award by individual line items when it is deemed to be in the best interest of the County. Collier County reserves its right to reject any sole response. 12. INSURANCE AND BONDING REQUIREMENTS 12.1 The Consultant shall at its own expense, carry and maintain insurance coverage from responsible companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida as set forth in the Insurance and Bonding attachment of this solicitation. The Consultant shall procure and maintain property insurance upon the entire project, if required, to the full insurable value of the scope of work. 12.2 The County and the Consultant waive against each other and the County’s separate Consultants, Contractors, Design Consultant, Subcontractors agents and employees of each and all of them, all damages covered by property insurance provided herein, except such rights as they may have to the proceeds of such insurance. The Consultant and County shall, where appropriate, require similar waivers of subrogation from the County’s separate Consultants, Design Consultants and Subcontractors and shall require each of them to include similar waivers in their contracts. 12.3 Collier County shall be responsible for purchasing and maintaining, its own liability insurance. 12.4 Certificates issued as a result of the award of this solicitation must identify “For any and all work performed on behalf of 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Solicitation (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Collier County.” 12.5 The General Liability Policy provided by Consultant to meet the requirements of this solicitation shall name Collier County, Florida, as an additional insured as to the operations of Consultant under this solicitation and shall contain a severability of interests provisions. 12.6 Collier County Board of County Commissioners shall be named as the Certificate Holder. The Certificates of Insurance must state the Contract Number, or Project Number, or specific Project description, or must read: For any and all work performed on behalf of Collier County. The "Certificate Holder" should read as follows: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Naples, Florida 12.7 The amounts and types of insurance coverage shall conform to the minimum requirements set forth in Insurance and Bonding attachment, with the use of Insurance Services Office (ISO) forms and endorsements or their equivalents. If Consultant has any self-insured retentions or deductibles under any of the below listed minimum required coverage, Consultant must identify on the Certificate of Insurance the nature and amount of such self- insured retentions or deductibles and provide satisfactory evidence of financial responsibility for such obligations. All self-insured retentions or deductibles will be Consultant’s sole responsibility. 12.8 Coverage(s) shall be maintained without interruption from the date of commencement of the Work until the date of completion and acceptance of the scope of work by the County or as specified in this solicitation, whichever is longer. 12.9 The Consultant and/or its insurance carrier shall provide 30 days written notice to the County of policy cancellation or non- renewal on the part of the insurance carrier or the Consultant. The Consultant shall also notify the County, in a like manner, within twenty-four (24) hours after receipt, of any notices of expiration, cancellation, non-renewal or material change in coverage or limits received by Consultant from its insurer and nothing contained herein shall relieve Consultant of this requirement to provide notice. In the event of a reduction in the aggregate limit of any policy to be provided by Consultant hereunder, Consultant shall immediately take steps to have the aggregate limit reinstated to the full extent permitted under such policy. 12.10 Should at any time the Consultant not maintain the insurance coverage(s) required herein, the County may terminate the Agreement or at its sole discretion shall be authorized to purchase such coverage(s) and charge the Consultant for such coverage(s) purchased. If Consultant fails to reimburse the County for such costs within thirty (30) days after demand, the County has the right to offset these costs from any amount due Consultant under this Agreement or any other agreement between the County and Consultant. The County shall be under no obligation to purchase such insurance, nor shall it be responsible for the coverage(s) purchased or the insurance company or companies used. The decision of the County to purchase such insurance coverage(s) shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of any of its rights under the Contract Documents. 12.11 If the initial or any subsequently issued Certificate of Insurance expires prior to the completion of the scope of work, the Consultant shall furnish to the County renewal or replacement Certificate(s) of Insurance not later than ten (10) calendar days after the expiration date on the certificate. Failure of the Consultant to provide the County with such renewal certificate(s) shall be considered justification for the County to terminate any and all contracts. 13. ADDITIONAL ITEMS AND/OR SERVICES Additional items and / or services may be added to the resultant contract, or purchase order, in compliance with the Procurement Ordinance. 14. COUNTY’S RIGHT TO INSPECT The County or its authorized Agent shall have the right to inspect the Consultant’s facilities/project site during and after each work assignment the Consultant is performing. 15. VENDOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION The County has implemented a Vendor Performance Evaluation System for all contracts awarded in excess of $25,000. To this end, vendors will be evaluated on their performance upon completion/termination of this Agreement. The County reserves the right to take into consideration a vendor’s past performance under a prior or current County contract when it is considering the granting of a new contract, the assignment of a work order, or any additional work. Past poor performance may result in the County deeming the vendor non-responsible and therefore refraining from awarding such work. 16. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT 16.1 The selected Consultant shall be required to sign a standard Collier County contract. 16.2 The resultant contract(s) may include purchase or work orders issued by the County’s project manager. 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Solicitation (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 16.3 The County reserves the right to include in any contract document such terms and conditions, as it deems necessary for the proper protection of the rights of Collier County. A sample copy of this contract is available upon request. The County will not be obligated to sign any contracts, maintenance and/or service agreements or other documents provided by the Consultant. 16.4 The County’s project manager shall coordinate with the Vendor / Contractor the return of any surplus assets, including materials, supplies, and equipment associated with the scope or work. 17. PUBLIC RECORDS COMPLIANCE 17.1 Florida Public Records Law Chapter 119, including specifically those contractual requirements in 119.0701(2)(a)-(b) as follows: IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONTRACTOR’S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: Communication and Customer Relations Division 3299 Tamiami Trail East Suite 102 Naples, FL 34112-5746 Telephone: (239) 252-8383 17.2 The Contractor must specifically comply with the Florida Public Records Law to: 17.2.1 Keep and maintain public records required by the public agency to perform the service. 17.2.2 Upon request from the public agency’s custodian of public records, provide the public agency with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law. 17.2.3 Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the contract if the Contractor does not transfer the records to the public agency. 17.2.4 Upon completion of the contract, transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the Contractor or keep and maintain public records required by the public agency to perform the service. If the Contractor transfers all public records to the public agency upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If the Contractor keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency, upon request from the public agency’s custodian of public records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 18. WORK ORDERS ON FIXED TERM CONTRACTS 18.1 The County reserves the right to order such services from selected firms as may be required during said period, but does not guarantee any minimum or maximum services to be ordered during the period specified from any given firm. Work Order service assignments shall be at the sole discretion of the County. 18.2 Work issued that is determined to be against a “CONTINUING CONTRACTS” shall not exceed $500,000. 18.3 Should any project that is active on a work order extend past the contract termination date, that work order will be active and extended as necessary until completion of such project. 19. PAYMENT METHOD 19.1 Payments are made in accordance with the Local Government Prompt Payment Act, Chapter 218, Florida Statutes. Vendor’s invoices must include: 19.1.1 Purchase Order Number 19.1.2 Description and quantities of the goods or services provided per instructions on the County’s purchase order or contract. Invoices shall be sent to: Board of County Commissioners Clerk’s Finance Department ATTN: Accounts Payable 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 700 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Solicitation (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Naples FL 34112 Or Emailed to: bccapclerk@collierclerk.com 19.2 Payments will be made for articles and/or services furnished, delivered, and accepted, upon receipt and approval of invoices submitted on the date of services or within six (6) months after completion of contract. Any untimely submission of invoices beyond the specified deadline period is subject to non-payment under the legal doctrine of “laches” as untimely submitted. Time shall be deemed of the essence with respect to the timely submission of invoices under this agreement. 19.3 In instances where the successful contractor may owe debts (including, but not limited to taxes or other fees) to Collier County and the contractor has not satisfied nor made arrangement to satisfy these debts, the County reserves the right to off- set the amount owed to the County by applying the amount owed to the vendor or contractor for services performed of for materials delivered in association with a contract. 19.4 Invoices shall not reflect sales tax. After review and approval, the invoice will be transmitted to the Finance Division for payment. Payment will be made upon receipt of proper invoice and in compliance with Chapter 218 Florida Statutes, otherwise known as the “Local Government Prompt Payment Act.” Collier County reserves the right to withhold and/or reduce an appropriate amount of any payment for work not performed or for unsatisfactory performance of Contractual requirements. 20. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY 20.1 All Consultants and Sub Consultants performing service for Collier County are required and shall comply with all Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), State and County Safety and Occupational Health Standards and any other applicable rules and regulations. Consultants and Sub Consultants shall be responsible for the safety of their employees and any unsafe acts or conditions that may cause injury or damage to any persons or property within and around the work site. All firewall penetrations must be protected in order to meet Fire Codes. 20.2 Collier County Government has authorized OSHA representatives to enter any Collier County facility, property and/or right-of-way for the purpose of inspection of any Consultant’s work operations. This provision is non-negotiable by any department and/or Consultant. 20.3 All new electrical installations shall incorporate NFPA 70E Short Circuit Protective Device Coordination and Arc Flash Studies where relevant as determined by the engineer. 20.4 All electrical installations shall be labeled with appropriate NFPA 70E arch flash boundary and PPE Protective labels. 21. POLLUTION PREVENTION The vendor is required to implement industry relevant pollution prevention and best management practices. Should pollution incidents occur, Collier County Pollution Control must be notified immediately. 22. LICENSES 22.1 The Consultant is required to possess the correct Business Tax Receipt, professional license, and any other authorizations necessary to carry out and perform the work required by the project pursuant to all applicable Federal, State and Local Law, Statute, Ordinances, and rules and regulations of any kind. Additionally, copies of the required licenses must be submitted with the proposal response indicating that the entity proposing, as well as the team assigned to the County account, is properly licensed to perform the activities or work included in the contract documents. Failure on the part of any Consultant to submit the required documentation may be grounds to deem Consultant non-responsive. A Consultant, with an office within Collier County is also required to have an occupational license. 22.2 All State Certified contractors who may need to pull Collier County permits or call in inspections must complete a Collier County Contractor License registration form and submit the required fee. After registering the license/registration will need to be renewed thereafter to remain “active” in Collier County. 22.3 If you have questions regarding professional licenses contact the Contractor Licensing, Community Development and Environmental Services at (239) 252-2431, 252-2432 or 252-2909. Questions regarding required occupational licenses, please contact the Tax Collector’s Office at (239) 252-2477. 23. SURVIVABILITY The Vendor agrees that any Purchase Order/Work Order/Solicitation Documents that extends beyond the expiration date of the original Solicitation will survive and remain subject to the terms and conditions of that Agreement until the completion or termination. 24. PRINCIPAL/COLLUSION By submission of this Proposal the undersigned, as Consultant, does declare that the only person or persons interested in this Proposal as principal or principals is/are named therein and that no person other than therein mentioned has any interest in this Proposal or in the contract to be entered into; that this Proposal is made without connection with any person, company 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Solicitation (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) or parties making a Proposal, and that it is in all respects fair and in good faith without collusion or fraud. 25. RELATION OF COUNTY It is the intent of the parties hereto that the Consultant shall be legally considered an independent Consultant, and that neither the Consultant nor their employees shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the County, and that the County shall be at no time legally responsible for any negligence on the part of said Consultant, their employees or agents, resulting in either bodily or personal injury or property damage to any individual, firm, or corporation. 26. TERMINATION Should the Consultant be found to have failed to perform services in a manner satisfactory to the County, the County may terminate this Agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a thirty (30) day written notice. The County shall be sole judge of non-performance. In the event that the award of this solicitation is made by the Procurement Services Director, the award and any resultant purchase orders may be terminated at any time by the County upon thirty (30) days written notice to the awarded vendor(s) pursuant to the Board’s Procurement Ordinance. 27. LOBBYING After the issuance of any solicitation, no current or prospective vendor or any person acting on their behalf, shall contact, communicate with or discuss any matter relating to the solicitation with any Collier County employee or elected or appointed official, other than the Procurement Services Director or his/her designees. This prohibition ends upon execution of the final contract or upon cancellation of the solicitation. Any current or prospective vendor that lobbies any Collier County employee or elected or appointed official while a solicitation is open or being recommended for award (i) may be deemed ineligible for award of that solicitation by the Procurement Services Director, and (ii) will be subject to Suspension and Debarment outlined in section Twenty-eight of County Ordinance 2017-08. 28. CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (Fl Statute 607.1501) In order to be considered for award, firms must be registered with the Florida Department of State Divisions of Corporations in accordance with the requirements of Florida Statute 607.1501 and provide a certificate of authority (www.sunbiz.org/search.html) prior to execution of a contract. A copy of the document may be submitted with the solicitation response and the document number shall be identified. Firms who do not provide the certificate of authority at the time of response shall be required to provide same within five (5) days upon notification of selection for award. If the firm cannot provide the document within the referenced timeframe, the County reserves the right to award to another firm. 29. SINGLE PROPOSAL Each Consultant must submit, with their proposal, the required forms included in this RPS. Only one proposal from a legal entity as a primary will be considered. A legal entity that submits a proposal as a primary or as part of a partnership or joint venture submitting as primary may not then act as a sub-consultant to any other firm submitting under the same RPS. If a legal entity is not submitting as a primary or as part of a partnership or joint venture as a primary, that legal entity may act as a sub-consultant to any other firm or firms submitting under the same RPS. All submittals in violation of this requirement will be deemed non-responsive and rejected from further consideration. 30. PROTEST PROCEDURES 30.1 Any prospective vendor / proposer who desires to protest any aspect(s) or provision(s) of the solicitation (including the form of the solicitation documents or procedures) shall file their protest with the Procurement Director strictly in accordance with the County’s current Procurement Ordinance and policies. 30.2 Any actual or prospective respondent who desires to formally protest the recommended contract award must file a notice of intent to protest with the Procurement Director within three (3) calendar days (excluding weekends and County holidays) of the date that the recommended award is posted. 30.3 Upon filing of said notice, the protesting party will have five (5) days to file a formal protest and will be given instructions as to the form and content requirements of the formal protest. A copy of the "Protest Policy" is available at the office of the Procurement Director. 31. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted Consultant list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit bids, proposals, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted Consultant list. 32. SECURITY AND BACKGROUND CHECKS 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Solicitation (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 32.1 The Contractor is required to comply with County Ordinance 2004-52, as amended. Background checks are valid for five (5) years and the Contractor shall be responsible for all associated costs. If required, Contractor shall be responsible for the costs of providing background checks by the Collier County Facilities Management Division for all employees that shall provide services to the County under this Agreement. This may include, but not be limited to, checking federal, state and local law enforcement records, including a state and FBI fingerprint check, credit reports, education, residence and employment verifications and other related records. Contractor shall be required to maintain records on each employee and make them available to the County for at least four (4) years. 32.2 All of Contractor’s employees and subcontractors must wear Collier County Government Identification badges at all times while performing services on County facilities and properties. Contractor ID badges are valid for one (1) year from the date of issuance and can be renewed each year at no cost to the Contractor during the time period in which their background check is valid, as discussed below. All technicians shall have on their shirts the name of the contractor’s business. 32.3 The Contractor shall immediately notify the Collier County Facilities Management Division via e-mail (DL- FMOPS@colliergov.net) whenever an employee assigned to Collier County separates from their employment. This notification is critical to ensure the continued security of Collier County facilities and systems. Failure to notify within four (4) hours of separation may result in a deduction of $500 per incident. 32.4 CCSO requires separate fingerprinting prior to work being performed in any of their locations. This will be coordinated upon award of the contract. If there are additional fees for this process, the vendor is responsible for all costs. 33. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Consultant shall complete the Conflict of Interest Affidavit included as an attachment to this RPS document. Disclosure of any potential or actual conflict of interest is subject to County staff review and does not in and of itself disqualify a firm from consideration. These disclosures are intended to identify and or preclude conflict of interest situations during contract selection and execution. 34. PROHIBITION OF GIFTS TO COUNTY EMPLOYEES No organization or individual shall offer or give, either directly or indirectly, any favor, gift, loan, fee, service or other item of value to any County employee, as set forth in Chapter 112, Part III, Florida Statutes, the current Collier County Ethics Ordinance and County Administrative Procedure 5311. Violation of this provision may result in one or more of the following consequences: a. Prohibition by the individual, firm, and/or any employee of the firm from contact with County staff for a specified period of time; b. Prohibition by the individual and/or firm from doing business with the County for a specified period of time, including but not limited to: submitting bids, RPS, and/or quotes; and, c. immediate termination of any contract held by the individual and/or firm for cause. 35. IMMIGRATION LAW AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION 35.1 Statutes and executive orders require employers to abide by the immigration laws of the United States and to employ only individuals who are eligible to work in the United States. 35.2 The Employment Eligibility Verification System (E-Verify) operated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in partnership with the Social Security Administration (SSA), provides an Internet-based means of verifying employment eligibility of workers in the United States; it is not a substitute for any other employment eligibility verification requirements. The program will be used for Collier County formal Invitations to Bid (ITB) and Request for Proposals (RFP) including Request for Professional Services (RPS) and construction services. 35.3 Exceptions to the program: 35.3.1 Commodity based procurement where no services are provided. 35.3.2 Where the requirement for the affidavit is waived by the Board of County Commissioners 35.4 Consultants / Bidders are required to enroll in the E-Verify program, and provide acceptable evidence of their enrollment, at the time of the submission of the Consultant’s/bidder’s proposal. Acceptable evidence consists of a copy of the properly completed E-Verify Company Profile page or a copy of the fully executed E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding for the company. Consultants are also required to provide the Collier County Procurement Services Division an executed affidavit certifying they shall comply with the E-Verify Program. The affidavit is attached to the solicitation documents. If the Bidder/Consultant does not comply with providing the acceptable E-Verify evidence and the executed affidavit the bidder’s / Consultant’s proposal may be deemed non-responsive. 35.5 Additionally, Consultants shall require all subcontracted Consultants to use the E-Verify system for all purchases not covered under the “Exceptions to the program” clause above. 35.6 For additional information regarding the Employment Eligibility Verification System (E-Verify) program visit the following website: http://www.dhs.gov/E-Verify. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to familiarize themselves with all rules and regulations governing this program. 35.7 Consultant acknowledges, and without exception or stipulation, any firm(s) receiving an award shall be fully responsible 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Solicitation (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) for complying with the provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 U.S.C. 1324, et seq. and regulations relating thereto, as either may be amended and with the provisions contained within this affidavit. Failure by the awarded firm(s) to comply with the laws referenced herein or the provisions of this affidavit shall constitute a breach of the award agreement and the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate said agreement immediately. VENDOR CHECKLIST ***Vendor should check off each of the following items as the necessary action is completed (please see, Vendor Check List)*** 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Solicitation (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 1 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services August 6, 2020 Ms. Evelyn Colon, Procurement Strategist Collier County Procurement Services Division 3295 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg. C-2 Naples, FL 34112 Dear Ms. Colon: Given the recent and ongoing situation with COVID-19, we find ourselves in a unique and challenging environment for advancing transportation planning priorities of communities throughout the US. The Collier MPO and the communities it serves are no exception. In fact, we are likely to emerge from the pandemic with a new way of doing business that places a greater emphasis on social distancing, public health best practices, and working from home. Tindale Oliver (TO) is excited to be a leader in planning for multimodal transportation solutions that respond to this “new normal.” With this in mind, we are pleased to submit this response to continue providing planning services to the MPO. Founded in 1989 as an S-Corporation in the State of Florida, Tindale Oliver has staff located throughout the state (Tampa, Fort Lauderdale, Miami, Jacksonville, Bartow), and Maryland (Baltimore) and has supported clients in 21 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. With more than 70 talented staff, including certified planners, professional engineers, certified LEED professionals, economists, accessibility inspectors (ADA), and GIS and graphics specialists, we combine creativity and insight with technical expertise and knowledge to deliver high-quality, innovative planning and engineering outcomes to our public sector clients. To further enhance the value we bring to the MPO, the Tindale Oliver Team has been augmented with three Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) certified partners—Florida Transportation Engineering, VIBEngineering, and Patel, Green & Associates. Having worked with these partners in the past, we will leverage their strengths in transportation planning, MPO compliance and certification, data collection, and local knowledge while advancing the MPO’s DBE Program Policy Goal. Understanding of the Scope of Work From the enactment of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficient Act (ISTEA) in 1991 to the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act in 2015, Tindale Oliver has specialized in metropolitan transportation planning, and we have been at the forefront of transportation policy and technological change, all of which have implications for transportation planning and the Collier MPO. Some of these changes are evolving rapidly and include: • Complete Streets – Adoption and implementation of a Complete Streets Policy by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), including development of the Florida Design Manual. • Vision Zero – Rapid growth of Vision Zero as a policy framework for rethinking the approach to traffic safety, with a focus on both infrastructure and civic activism. • Emerging Technologies – Proliferation of mobile application-based mobility options and rapid advancement of automated and connected vehicles, including pilot projects. Collier County Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category Letter of Interest RPS # 18-7432-MP Collier County Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category PRIME FIRM: Tindale Oliver 1000 N. Ashley Drive Suite 400 Tampa, FL 33602 Ph: (813) 224-8862; Fax: (813) 226-2106 PROJECT CONTACTS: Robert Cursey, AICP Principal-in-Charge Tindale Oliver Office: (813) 224-8862 Mobile: (813) 777-8243 rcursey@tindaleoliver.com Wally Blain, AICP Project Manager Tindale Oliver Office: (813) 224-8862 Mobile: (813) 344-7322 wblain@tindaleoliver.com SUBCONSULTANTS: > Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc. (FTE)* > Patel, Greene & Associates, LLC (PGA)* > VIBEngineering, Inc. (VIBE)* *DBE certified 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) LETTER OF INTEREST 2 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services To further demonstrate our understanding of the MPO’s scope of work, the Tindale Oliver Team offers the following key benefits to the Collier MPO in fulfilling its mission: • What We Know and Love – We specialize in metropolitan planning, smart growth, and public finance and offer one of the largest groups of certified planners in Florida. This translates to an enhanced understanding of multimodal transportation solutions, State and federal planning requirements, traditional and innovative funding solutions, economic development incentives, workforce/affordable housing, and land use and transportation integration. • Local Understanding – We offer extensive local knowledge, experience, and working relationships in southwest Florida, including FDOT District 1, MPOs/TPOs, counties, cities, and transit agencies. We have served as a General Planning Consultant for the Collier MPO for more than a decade and have provided planning services to Collier County for more than 30 years. • Innovative but Practical – Our approach to metropolitan planning balances policy, innovation, and effective public engagement (with successful development of virtual meetings) to garner support from affected citizens and other stakeholders, ensures consistency with MPO policy direction, and increases the probability of project implementation. • 100% Public Sector Firm – Starting more than a decade ago, we made a conscious decision to be a firm dedicated to the public sector. As a result, there will be no actual or perceived conflicts of interest with the private sector. Tindale Oliver’s approach to general consulting relationships is straightforward and focuses on a commitment to regular communication with our clients and an ability to serve as an extension of staff. Ongoing communication will ensure that each work plan is developed to make the most effective use of MPO resources. High-quality work and responsiveness are the keys to building and strengthening our working relationship with the MPO. In conclusion, we are pleased to offer an experienced and committed team that specializes in MPO planning services. We are committed to continuing our long-term working relationship with the Collier MPO that began a decade ago. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Bill Ball, AICP Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Authorized Signatory 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Interest Tab 1: Ability of Professional Personnel Team Overview ................................................................................... 1-1 Project Management Team ................................................................ 1-2 Teaming Partners ............................................................................... 1-3 Tindale Oliver Team Roles for Collier MPO GPC ............................... 1-3 Tindale Oliver Team Staffing Matrix .................................................. 1-5 Understanding Collier MPO and Local Priorities ............................... 1-6 Tindale Oliver’s Responses to Federal Legislation ............................ 1-6 Understanding Collier MPO and Local Priorities ............................... 1-7 Tindale Oliver Team Resumes Tab 2: Past Performance Reference Questionnaires and Project Summaries .......................... 2-1 Tab 3: Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm Staff Availability.................................................................................. 3-1 Management Team Availability (over next 12 months) .................... 3-2 Key Staff Availability (over next 12 months) ...................................... 3-3 Tindale Oliver Project Team Availability ........................................... 3-4 Tab 4: Required Forms Required Forms and Attachments ..................................................... 4-1 > Vendor Checklist > Form 1: Vendor Declaration Statement > Form 2: Conflict of Interest Statement > Tindale Oliver Certificate of Incorporation > Form 3: Immigration Affidavit Certification > Tindale Oliver E-Verify Company Profile Page > Form 4: Certification for Claiming Status as a Local Business (Not Applicable) > Form 5: Reference Questionnaire (included in Tab 2) > Form 6: Grant Provisions and Assurances Package > Tindale Oliver W-9 Form > Insurance and Bonding Requirements/Vendor’s Insurance Statement > Licenses and Certifications - Team Firms and Proposed Personnel > Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ABILITIES OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL Team Overview Tindale Oliver Tindale Oliver was formed in 1989 to provide infrastructure planning, engineering, and innovative financing services to the public sector. The founders and subsequent leaders of the firm come from public sector backgrounds that translate to a practical understanding of issues that government agency officials face related to planning, engineering, infrastructure financing, and project implementation. The firm’s major business activities involve four primary service areas, including: > Transportation > Transit > Urban Planning & Community Design > Public Finance Today, Tindale Oliver is a firm with an established statewide reputation in Florida and a growing national presence as a leader in providing quality, innovative transportation planning and engineering services to its broad range of clients. We are a firm of 75+ employees, with staff certifications including professional engineers, certified planners, LEED and GIS professionals, and accessibility inspectors, among other professional registrations. With offices and staff in Florida (Tampa, Fort Lauderdale, Jacksonville, Miami, Bartow) and Maryland (Baltimore), we have supported clients in 21 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Metropolitan Planning Since 1989, Tindale Oliver has specialized in metropolitan planning for MPOs/TPOs and currently serves as a General Planning Consultant to 17 MPOs/TPOs throughout Florida, 15 of which we are the prime consultant on the contract. Most of these contracts are longstanding relationships that began in the 1990s. Our metropolitan planning experience includes: > Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) development > Congestion Management Process (CMP) development > Financial planning > Transit planning > Bicycle and pedestrian planning > Greenways and trails master plan development > Corridor and subarea studies > Performance measures and monitoring 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL 1 - 2 1 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Our most valuable resource is our staff, whose collective experience sets us apart. The Management Team identified for the Collier MPO is one that includes a long history of working with the Collier MPO and a breadth of experience as a result of working with Florida MPOs for more than 20 years. We approach management of MPO contracts by distributing workload among project managers and task managers and providing expert staff support. Following is a brief overview of the management team, teaming partners, and key personal available to the Collier MPO. Project Management Team Wally Blain, AICP (TO), will continue to serve as Project Manager for the Collier MPO. Having working for the Hillsborough MPO for 10 years, he provides a unique understanding of MPO practice and policy requirements. His background includes statewide experience as a consultant and daily work with local agency partners and FDOT as an MPO staff planner. Tindale Oliver Current Florida MPO/TPO Contracts Florida MPO / TPO Continuing Services Contracts – Prime Consultant Tindale Oliver Project Manager Charlotte CountyPunta Gorda MPO Wally Blain, AICP Collier MPO Wally Blain, AICP Hernando/Citrus MPO Chris Keller, AICP Hillsborough County MPO Chris Keller, AICP Indian River County MPO Rob Cursey, AICP Lee County MPO Wally Blain, AICP Martin MPO Jill Quigley, AICP Ocala/Marion County MPO Rob Cursey, AICP Pasco County MPO Bill Ball, AICP Forward Pinellas Rob Cursey, AICP Polk County TPO Rob Cursey, AICP River to Sea TPO Joel Rey, P.E., AICP Sarasota/Manatee MPO Wally Blain, AICP Space Coast TPO Bill Ball, AICP St. Lucie TPO Rob Cursey, AICP 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL 1 - 3 1 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Wally has developed a unique blend of skills that allow him to effectively manage technical and policy-related tasks. His experience working for the Hillsborough County MPO included managing the Transportation Improvement Program, balancing project costs and revenues for the LRTP, overseeing the update of transportation elements for the County’s four jurisdictions, and developing customized technical data analysis tools. As with the MPO’s current General Planning Consultant contract, he will work closely with Collier MPO staff throughout the effort as the primary point of contact to ensure that project needs are addressed, resulting in implementable, community- oriented and supported plans. Rob Cursey, AICP (TO), will serve as Principal-in-Charge. He leads Tindale Oliver’s Multimodal Planning team and has served as Project Manager, Principal-in- Charge, or Task Leader on numerous assignments with MPOs, FDOT, and local governments. Throughout his career, he has been responsible for managing and providing technical support for transportation planning projects, including all modes of travel, with expertise in all aspects of public sector planning (primarily long-range transportation planning), sub-area studies, corridor studies, travel demand modeling, and roadway inventory. Bill Ball, AICP (TO), will serve as Senior Advisor and Quality Assurance Manager. He has significant experience in transportation planning, public transportation planning and analysis, demographic and travel behavior analysis, and innovative finance, which has proven to be a valuable resource to FDOT, MPOs, transit systems, counties, cities, and other agencies throughout Florida and the US. He specializes in metropolitan and transit planning and has developed close working relationships as a general planning consultant over the past decade, including on projects for FDOT Districts 1, 4, and 7 and MPOs in Pasco, Hernando, Hillsborough, Pinellas, Lee, and St. Lucie counties, among others. As a general planning consultant, he has managed projects related to long range transportation plans, public transportation, congestion management, multi-modal corridor studies, corridor preservation, work programming, and transportation finance. Teaming Partners To meet the needs of the MPO, Tindale Oliver will be supported by three DBE certified partners—Florida Transportation Engineers (FTE), Patel, Greene & Associates (PGA), and VIBEngineering (VIBE). Tindale Oliver Team Roles for Collier MPO GPC Scope Tasks Task Leader TO PGA FTE VIBE Safety Demian Miller, AICP L S S Security Wally Blain, AICP L S S Policy Planning Bill Ball, AICP L S Systems Planning Rob Cursey, AICP L S S Sub-Area / Corridor Chris Keller, AICP L S S S Transportation Statistics Steve Infanti, AICP L S S S Transit Planning Randy Farwell L S TD Planning Sarah Goolsby, GISP L Short Range Planning Wally Blain, AICP L S Long Range Planning Wally Blain, AICP L S S S Congestion Management Wally Blain, AICP L S S S Multi-Modal (Bike/Ped) Chris Keller, AICP L S S Public Involvement Jill Quigley, AICP L S L = Lead; S = Support TO =Tindale Oliver; PGA=Patel, Greene & Associates; FTE=Florida Transportation Engineering; VIBE=VIBEngineering 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL 1 - 4 1 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services With a history of working together in the past, this strong team will meet the needs of the MPO and extend the Tindale Oliver commitment to assisting the MPO in meeting its DBE utilization goal. Because of partnerships such as these, Tindale Oliver received an “A” DBE utilization grade from FDOT for FY 2018/19 based on 14.69% DBE utilization across eight projects and is committed to applying the diverse skillsets of our team members to ensure that we meet the DBE goal of the Collier MPO. Florida Transportation Engineering (FTE) FTE is a professional consulting firm providing engineering, planning, surveying, and landscape architecture services. It serves its public and private sector clients in Highway Design, Signalization Design, Roadway and Decorative Lighting, Signing & Pavement Marking, Maintenance of Traffic, Drainage, Construction Engineering and Inspection, Traffic Engineering, Traffic Signal Systems, Intelligent Transportation Systems, Transportation Planning, Transit Corridor, Multimodal Corridors, Highway and Traffic Data Collection, Public Involvement, and Landscape Architecture. FTE was founded in 1989 and is a certified DBE and MBE firm. With a staff of professional, technical, and support personnel, its corporate office is in Punta Gorda, with offices in DeFuniak Springs, Jacksonville, Miami, Tallahassee, and Tampa. Recent FTE Teaming with Tindale Oliver: > Collier MPO Transportation System Performance Report > Charlotte MPO 2045 LRTP > FDOT D4 Districtwide Modal Development Services Patel, Greene & Associates, LLC (PGA) PGA was founded in 2011 as a DBE/MBE and has grown into a preeminent transportation engineering firm that serves FDOT, municipalities, and other agencies throughout Florida. It is a leader in innovative planning, environmental, roadway, drainage, structures, and traffic services and takes great pride in providing its clients with cost-effective, practical, and performance- based engineering solutions that fit the needs and budget of projects. The firm has managed, designed, and reviewed projects ranging from sidewalks to resurfacing and from widening to multi-level interchanges. Its planning staff bring significant experience throughout Florida and the US. PGA offers a strong background in integrated transportation and land use studies, freight/logistics and passenger operations planning, MPO/TPO and policy planning, transit planning, bike/ped and trail planning, safety action plans, roadway safety audits, traffic analysis, corridor studies, and project development and environmental evaluations. Staff also are experienced in managing Local Area Program (LAP) projects from the application process to constructing projects. Recent PGA Teaming with Tindale Oliver: > FDOT D1, US-41 sidewalk design and lighting plans > FDOT D7 Safety, Safe Routes to Schools > FDOT D7 Safety, Design Build Push Button Support VIBEngineering, Inc. (VIBE) Founded by traffic/ITS engineers with 60+ years of combined experience in the transportation industry, VIBE offers services in transportation planning, traffic engineering, and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) planning, design, and construction inspection. It is pre-qualified in Traffic Engineering and Operations Studies and Traffic Operations Design by FDOT and is certified as a DBE, MBE, and SBE with FDOT, the City of Tampa, and Hillsborough County. VIBE’s staff have been involved in many Districtwide contracts, including as ITS Consultant in FDOT D7, and many Pinellas County ITS projects, including Program Management Services, Gulf Boulevard ATMS/ITS Design Services, and U-19 ATMS Design. Recent VIBE Teaming with Tindale Oliver: > Charlotte MPO 2045 LRTP > Work with founding staff with their previous firms > Transportation professional committees in Tampa Bay (e.g., Annual Regional Transportation Super Session) Team Staffing Matrix and Resumes The Tindale Oliver Team staffing matrix is provided on the next page, and detailed resumes of the key personnel proposed for this contract conclude this section. These resumes provide additional information on the education, professional certifications and affiliations, experience, roles, and pertinent skill sets for all Tindale Oliver Team key staff. Understanding of Metropolitan Planning The table on page 1-6 illustrates Tindale Oliver’s insight and response to the evolution of federal legislation concerning metropolitan planning over the past 30 years. From the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) in 1991 to the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act in 2015, we have been at the forefront of helping our MPO clients understand 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL 1 - 5 1 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Collier County Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Tindale Oliver Team Staffing Matrix Staff Firm Safety Security Policy Planning Systems Planning Sub-Area/ Corridor Transportation Statistics Transit Planning TD Planning Short Range Planning Long Range Planning Congestion Management Multi-Modal (Bike/Ped) Public Involvement Wally Blain, AICP TO S S S S S S S Rob Cursey, AICP TO S S S S S S Bill Ball, AICP TO S S S S S Chris Keller, AICP TO S S S Demian Miller, AICP TO S S S S S Jill Quigley, AICP TO S S S S Elisabeth Schuck, AICP, LEED GA TO S S S S S S S S Randy Farwell TO S S S S S Sarah Goolsby, GISP TO S S S S S Steve Infanti, AICP TO S S S S Ali Ankudowich, AICP TO S S S S S S Buse Cengiz TO S S S S Hélène Miles TO S S S S S S S Ian Debnam, AICP TO S S S S S Ines Nizeye, AI/PE TO S S S S S Juan Butler, GISP TO S S S Patrick Dougherty, AICP TO S S S S S Richard Dreyer, AICP, CCTM TO S S S S Robert Modys, AICP TO S S S S W.T. Bowman, P.E., RSP1 TO S S S Taylor Cox TO S S S Kayla Burrows TO S S S Bo Galloway TO S S S Laura Molennor TO S S Andrea Sauvageot TO S S Laura Herrscher, AICP PGA S S S S S S S S S Peyton McLeod, PTP PGA S S S S S S Oliver Rodrigues, P.E., PTOE FTE S S S S S Charles Sloan FTE S S Sage Kamiya, P.E., PTOE VIBE S S S S S Arthur Tester, P.E. VIBE S S S L L L L L L L L L L L L L Lead S - Support L 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL 1 - 6 1 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Tindale Oliver Responses to Federal Legislation 1990 2000 2005 ISTEA > Recognized Federal funding could be used to develop planning process and meet federal and State requirements. > Developed first ISTEA- compliant LRTP for MPOs in Charlotte, Hernando, Hillsborough, Pasco, Pinellas, and Volusia. > Worked with Pinellas, Pasco, and Hillsborough MPOs to develop a Congestion Management System (CMS) that supports concurrency and growth management. > Worked with Pasco County to develop evaluation tools for a concurrency process that allows for area- wide level of service in the urban boundary and congestion in certain areas, while continuing to allow issuance of building permits. TEA-21 > Continued to support and develop LRTPs, congestion management systems, and concurrency management systems, consistent with TEA-21 requirements for MPO clients. > Expanded response to include emphasis on transit planning, including transit development planning, service planning, transit-focuses corridor studies, and long range transit planning. > Focused on integration of transportation and land use in the LRTP plan development process. > Applied state-of-the-art public involvement techniques, including consensus-building workshops and charettes (greater involvement of stakeholders in the development and presentation of consensus to elected officials). > Pioneered use of community workshops to evaluate impacts of projects on under-served and under-represented communities (i.e., Environmental Justice). SAFETEA-LU > Assisted communities in implementing new and/ or expanded local revenue sources (impact fees, sales taxes, municipal service taxing units, and others). > Applied flexible and creative approaches to developing revenue forecasts for Indian River, Lake-Sumter, and Charlotte counties. > Implemented corridor preservation plan in Pasco County to identify ultimate transportation needs and preserve right -of-way for future transportation investments. > Developed new approaches to assess transit feasibility for traditional markets (Transit Orientation Index) and discretionary markets (Density Threshold Assessment). 2012–2020 MAP-21/FAST Act > LRTP performance measures are multimodal in nature, practical, measurable, and successfully applied in more than 50 LRTPs throughout Florida. > Participated in statewide meetings on performance measures and provided comments and input to FDOT on MPO performance measures. > Created new processes for several LRTPs approved in 2015 for evaluating improvements and performance measures and targets that will be monitored closely with future federal guidance to ensure successful future certification. > Assisted Sarasota/ Manatee MPO in establishing baseline conditions and targets for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) performance measures. > Integrated scenario planning into the LRTP process to better understand the impacts of different emphasis areas (transit, technology, environment, etc.). changes in federal metropolitan planning requirements and successfully integrate changes and innovations into their planning processes and work programs. With each new federal transportation act, Tindale Oliver has supported its MPO clients with understanding requirements, assessing implications, and, most important, identifying opportunities for advancing the mission of each MPO. Our objectives are: > Ensuring legislative compliance and a smooth MPO certification process > Customizing responses to legislation to correspond with the needs of each community Understanding Collier MPO and Local Priorities Tindale Oliver has served the Collier MPO continuously since 2000, working with MPO staff on more than 30 task orders with varying scopes of services that parallel many of the services identified in this effort. We also have worked with Collier County on multiple contracts to conduct finance, safety, planning, engineering, and other studies since the early 1990s. In the past five years, Tindale Oliver has received the following assignments from the Collier MPO and Collier County: 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL 1 - 7 1 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services > Update of MPO’s Congestion Management Process and development of its first-ever Transportation System Performance Report and Action Plan (current) > Identification of transit level of service measures and funding options through Transit Impact Analysis (current) > Analysis of transportation safety-related concerns and development of countermeasures through Local Road Safety Plan (current) > Currently studying development of East Naples through the Community Redevelopment Plan > Third consecutive Major Transit TDP Update for CAT (2019) > Update of Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (2019) > Support to Rural Lands Stewardship Area restudy by providing information to study group during public workshop on fiscal impacts of development (2019) > Update of Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan (2019) > Assessment of traffic speeds on CR-951 as update to 2013 study (2018) > Analysis of land use reallocation and financial feasibility of 2040 LRTP amendment (2018) > Update of Collier County Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2018) > Numerous Impact Fee studies and transportation- related funding studies Based on our long-term relationship and work conducted for the MPO and Collier County, Tindale Oliver is well-acquainted with the development patterns in the county and truly understands the context in which decisions are made and projects are prepared. Many TO staff have worked on these projects and have teamed with MPO staff to educate the public and stakeholders to better understand the needs, growth trends, priorities, and results of projects and investments. Tindale Oliver also understands the issues facing the Collier MPO going into the future; following is a summary of the primary issues and challenges that will likely need to be addressed during this Collier MPO GPC contract: > Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety and Complete Streets – Consistent with national best practices, transportation facilities can be designed to meet the needs of their anticipated users. FDOT’s context classification system describes the general characteristics of the land use, development patterns, and roadway connectivity, all of which help identify the likely users of a transportation facility (pedestrians, transit riders, auto and truck drivers, etc.). Designing accordingly helps ensure safe and comfortable travel for the anticipated users. Implementing recommendations of the Bicycle/ Pedestrian Master Plan and the Local Road Safety Plan will be critical for the MPO in partnering with local implementation agencies for developing a safer transportation system. > Transportation Infrastructure and Operational Funding – To foster real improvements and have lasting impacts, a balanced and dependable funding stream is critical. To achieve consensus and realize a sustainable future, innovative strategies and creative leveraging will be required. Previous efforts as a result of Tindale Oliver recommendations include generation of more than $940 million in impact fees for Collier County, Mobility Fees and the Penny for Pasco sales tax for the Pasco County MPO, the first and only countywide Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU) in Florida for transit capital/ operations for the St. Lucie TPO, and the one-penny sales tax referendum in 2014 for Clayton County, Georgia. > Future Growth and Build-Out – Critical questions that continue to be asked relate to where future growth is desired to occur and how local government should support/incentivize targeted locations. Our support and development of Collier’s Master Mobility Plan and Parks Master Plan provides us with the unique foundation and understanding of the baseline and existing conditions. Leveraging these master plans into implementable and achievable strategies and phasing improvements incrementally will be crucial and will require an overall comprehensive approach to be successful. This concept is similar to our work completed in Greensboro, North Carolina, for its transit system, resulting in a doubling of its ridership in five years and continued movement forward in meeting the mobility needs of the community. > Regional Connectivity and Coordination – Regional priorities for the movement of people and goods will need to be reviewed so supporting land use and infrastructure needs can be better coordinated and evaluated. Concerted efforts will require closer coordination with the FDOT D1 and the Lee MPO. Our relationships with each will be leveraged to develop new methods and accomplish true regional concepts and strategies that can be embraced by all stakeholders. Our work for the Polk County Regional 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL 1 - 8 1 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Transit Authority/Polk TPO, the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority, the MPO Chairs Coordinating Council in the Tampa Bay area, and the Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization in St. Lucie and Martin counties will provide focus to ensure that best practices are identified and integrated into the process early and effectively. It should be noted that we were involved when many of these efforts were initiated and, as such, we have experienced successes and have the benefit of lessons learned. > Congestion Management Process – With successful completion of the Transportation System Performance Report and Action Plan, the MPO will need to identify funding strategies and partnerships with implementing agencies for addressing congested areas. Availability of real-time traffic data will provide the MPO with the opportunity to identify and quickly respond in the future. The Regional Integrated Transportation Information System (RITIS) is available to the MPO to review and evaluate real-time traffic data for transportation analysis. > Performance Measures and Targets – The FAST Act requires enhanced performance measures and performance-based planning, and federally-adopted rules now require MPOs to meet requirements for performance measures and targets that are designed to help confirm that the expenditure of funds is resulting in measurable benefits that move the MPO toward meeting established targets. Targets will need to be flexible as local governments evolve and priorities change. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Wally Blain, AICP Senior Project Manager Role: Project Manager Wally joined Tindale Oliver after 10 years with the Hillsborough County MPO and serves as a staff extension to the firm’s MPO clients through General Planning Consultant contracts. For the MPO, he developed a unique blend of skills to manage technical and policy-related tasks. Efforts included managing the Transportation Improvement Program, coordinating priorities at the regional and local levels, overseeing the update of the Transportation Element for the four jurisdictions of Hillsborough County, developing customized technical tools, and managing the Long Range Transportation Plan. Relevant Project Experience Transportation System Performance Report and Action Plan Collier MPO | Naples, FL | 2019-2020 (Ongoing) Project Manager Developed first bi-annual system performance report. Analyzing integrating reliability measures on collector and arterial roadway system, identifying gaps in data availability, conducting analysis using FDOT Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) procedures at select built-out intersections. Action plan will be developed geared towards identifying programmable solutions and strategies to address and congestion issues. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Sarasota/Manatee MPO | Sarasota and Manatee Counties, FL | 2018-Ongoing Project Manager Conducting review of current trends and conditions MPO for LRTP update. Reviewing existing demographic and employment conditions to capture topics such as impacts of coastal and environmental considerations, commuting patterns of suburban/residential areas, location of affordable housing. Updating MPO goals, objectives and prioritization criteria for developing Cost Affordable 2045 LRTP. Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan Collier MPO | Naples, FL | 2017-2019 Project Manager Conducted update of Collier 2012 Comprehensive Pathways Plan. Analyzed mobility needs of community and balanced those with needs of heavily used Shared Use Paths and on-road bike lanes by recreational and long-distance riders. Included assessment of safety hot spot locations, proximity to transit routes, and overlay of Environmental Justice Areas. Using online, interactive mapping website (Wikimap), used GIS to overlay results of technical analysis with public comments regarding needed facilities. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Needs Assessment Hillsborough County MPO | Tampa, FL | 2019 Project Manager Conducting performance-based analysis for Good Repair and Resilience, Real Choices When Not Driving, and Major Investment programs of MPO’s LRTP. Includes developing benchmark performance based on extending current funding commitments through 2045 to establish system measures, establishing funding commitment or desired outcome, identification of transportation needs and priorities that result in targeted performance measures. Office Location Tampa, FL Education BA, Geography, Stetson University (1996) Years of Experience 23 Years with Tindale Oliver 11 Certifications AICP #017816 (2002) Professional Affiliations American Planning Association 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Wally Blain, AICP Senior Project Manager 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Pasco County MPO | New Port Richey, FL | 2018-2019 (Ongoing) Project Manager Five-year update of Mobility 2040 LRTP. Responsible for coordinating and executing full development of 2045 LRTP. Included socio-economic data development, scenario planning, cost and revenue analysis, public engagement, develop of needs plan and development of cost affordable plan. Innovative and key aspects of plan development include incorporation of all modes of travel, consideration of new ACES technology elements, innovative public engagement, incorporation of Vision 54/56 recommendations. 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Amendment Collier MPO | Naples, FL | 2018 Project Manager Analyzed impacts to cost feasible LRTP based on revised growth assumptions of major planned development. Analysis included review of countywide growth projections through 2040, reallocating future growth, developing transportation alternatives, modeling performance of transportation system. Vision 54/56 Corridor Study, Phase 2 Pasco County MPO | Pasco County, FL | 2018 Project Manager Building on results from Phase 1 of Vision 54/56 Corridor Study, refined number of transportation alternatives moving forward as potential options for implementation over next 20 years. Continued coordination through citizen-driven task force used for evaluating more detailed technical analysis of Phase 2. Safety/Security Performance Measures and Target Setting Sarasota/Manatee MPO | Sarasota , FL | 2017-2018 Project Manager Furthering the analysis conducted for establishing the MPO’s first safety targets under the FAST Act, Wally led the analysis required for reporting the current trends and establishment of safety targets. This analysis identified high crash locations based on the fatal and serious injury safety performance measures. Through coordination with the MPO and the Technical Advisory Committee, four of the top locations were selected for field assessments following the approach for road safety audits that included a multidisciplinary team of planners, engineers, and law enforcement. These assessments generated short, mid, and long-term recommendations for the MPO’s inclusion in future TIP priorities. Additionally, the MPO expanded the focus of safety and security planning by hosting a regional training course aimed at identifying partnership opportunities with emergency planning, transit providers and regional partners in developing an All-Hazards Recovery Plan. Performance Measure Data Collection and Prioritization Sarasota/Manatee MPO | Sarasota, FL | 2016-2017 Project Manager Following recent rulemaking of the FAST-Act, the MPO began the assessment of baseline conditions and an overhaul of the project prioritization process that connected the requirement of performance based planning with the selection of transportation projects. Included in this assignment was the assessment of the five safety performance measures identified in the FAST-Act for reporting and target setting. This assessment evaluated the relative trend over the past 5-years along with a comparison of trends urban area trends to statewide trends. This analysis assisted the MPO in the early stages of evaluating current trends and conditions for the purpose of target setting. Also included was a review of current project prioritization methodologies and development of a multi-modal transportation priority list for TIP development. Brooksville Area-Wide Transportation Study Hernando/Citrus MPO | Brooksville, FL | 2016-2017 Project Manager Conducted a comprehensive assessment of future travel conditions for the existing one-way pair of US 41/SR 50A through Downtown Brooksville. Known locally as Jefferson Street and Broad Street, this one-way pair configuration has been the focal point of much discussion surrounding the vibrancy and livability of the downtown area. This study evaluated potential for reverting the one-way pair back to two-way operation along with an implementation plan outlining the policy, coordination, funding, and maintenance steps necessary. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Throughout his professional consulting career, Mr. Cursey has been responsible for managing and providing technical support for transportation planning projects, including all modes of travel. His expertise includes all aspects of public sector planning, primarily, long-range transportation planning, sub-area studies, corridor studies, freight and goods movement, travel demand modeling, bicycle and pedestrian planning, parking studies, and roadway characteristics inventory. Relevant Project Experience General Planning Consultant Pasco County MPO | Pasco County, FL | Ongoing Principal-in-Charge Tindale Oliver has served as General Planning Consultant since 1993, conducted 80+ task work orders including LRTPs, TDPs, corridor studies and corridor preservation, sub- area studies, ADA compliance and accessibility, impact/mobility fees, incremental development of transit services from new fixed-route system 9-route bus system with more than 1M annual rides. ACES Investment Strategy for the Polk TPO 2045 LRTP Polk TPO | Bartow, FL | 2018-2020 Project Manager As consultant to the Polk TPO, Tindale Oliver assisted with a 3-phase study effort known as the Investment Strategy for Automated, Connected, Electric, and Shared Vehicles. The first phase defined and researched what the ACES technology entailed and what are assumed market penetration and adoption rates of each component. The second phase analyzed existing economic, demographic, and travel components of the Polk market as well as future trends. The third phase drew upon the first two phases of the study and resulted in policy recommendations and projects for inclusion in the 2045 LRTP. The study included the formation of a stakeholders committee that received briefings and provided feedback and direction through the process. Buildout Model Development and Corridor Preservation Update Pasco County | Pasco County, FL | 2016-2020 Project Manager Tindale Oliver completed an update to the Pasco County Corridor Preservation Plan, which was initially developed a decade ago by Tindale Oliver. With changes over time, the corridor preservation tables and maps needed to be reviewed and updated to reflect changes that occurred since the development of the original plan. Included in the update was a review and modifications to the typical roadway cross-sections, which determined how much right-of-way needed to be reserved for future use. In addition, a new buildout model was developed based upon the latest version of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Model. Robert E. Cursey, Jr., AICP Principal/Director of Metropolitan Transportation Planning Role: Principal-in-Charge Office Location Tampa, FL Education MA, Geography, Georgia State University (1993) BS, Geosciences, University of Tennessee (1988) Years of Experience 30 Years with Tindale Oliver 4 Certifications AICP # 011328 (1995) Professional Affiliations American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) American Planning Association (APA) Tampa Bay Applications Group (TBAG) - Board Member 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Robert E. Cursey, Jr., AICP Principal/Director of Metropolitan Transportation Planning City of Sunrise Area-wide Transportation Needs Assessment FDOT District 4 | Broward County, FL | 2018-2019 Project Manager Evaluated current and future transportation characteristics, determined multimodal improvement needs, evaluated transportation network from multimodal perspective, identified feasible and acceptable improvements to address anticipated growth and development and related travel demand. Provided professional transportation planning and engineering services, collection and analysis of land use, transportation, and socio-economic related data. Traffic Count Program St. Lucie County TPO | St. Lucie County, FL | 2016-Ongoing Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager Tindale Oliver has maintained a traffic count management system for several years across multiple general planning contracts. Annual activities include identifying locations to be counted, scheduled counts, uploading new counts to the count database, production on an annual count report, and maintenance of a web-based count map. Over 100 counts are collected annually to maintain this program. Intermodal Center Studies for University Area and Wesley Chapel FDOT District 7 | Tampa, FL | 2017-Ongoing Project Manager Determining type of facility needed and identifying potential locations for Center Evaluating site(s) in terms of parking and transit supply and demand, constructability, transportation infrastructure requirements, and order-of-magnitude costs. Developing and executing project management plan and stakeholder communication plan, coordinating with ongoing projects, performing Facility Needs Assessment, defining conceptual layout and characteristics, developing evaluation process and identifying candidate sites, performing site evaluation process, assessing traffic impact of selected sites, developing conceptual plan for selected sites, developing costs for conceptual plan, conducting funding analysis, preparing study report and documentation. Tampa Bay Region Freight Bottleneck Analysis FDOT District 7 | Tampa, FL | 2019-Ongoing Project Manager As a task under the District 7 Modal Development contract, Tindal Oliver is performing a freight bottleneck analysis. The analysis includes reviewing available data and performance measures for assessing existing conditions, developing a methodology for evaluating and prioritizing bottlenecks, and analyzing solutions or policies to alleviate or eliminate bottlenecks for freight carriers. 2040 LRTP Freight Investment Program Hillsborough MPO | Tampa, FL | 2014* Principal-in-Charge Developed the initial cost basis of freight needs for the first five years of the 2040 LRTP. Based on the initial cost, projected funding investment boxes were developed for the remaining 20-years of the plan. CSX Intermodal Sub-Area Study Hillsborough MPO | Tampa, FL | 2012-2013* Project Manager The purpose of this study was to develop an improved circulation and access plan for the industrial area surrounding the CSX Intermodal Rail Yard and recommend alternatives to improve truck circulation within the area. Responsible for completing all aspects of the study including the location and identification of manufacturing and distribution centers in the study area, truck types using the corridors, truck counts, and freight data. Findings were presented in a technical memorandum and presented to the Hillsborough MPO. *Work performed prior to joining Tindale Oliver 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Bill specializes in transit planning, metropolitan transportation planning, and public finance. His transit expertise includes short- and long-range transit planning, federal transit requirements, transit facilities and capital planning and budgeting, transit performance assessment, demand forecasting, cost and revenue forecasting, premium transit planning, transit market assessment, and system and route-level planning and operational analysis. Bill served as the Project Manager for SMART Connect, a premium transit feasibility study for the major north/south corridors in Manatee and Sarasota counties. He has also served as the Principal-in-Charge on numerous premium transit and Alternatives Analysis projects, including Downtown Clearwater to Clearwater Beach Transit Alternatives, Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Alternatives Analysis (sub-consultant), LYNX 2030 Vision, and the Pinellas County MPO Countywide BRT Study, among others Since joining Tindale Oliver in 1995, Bill initiated and led the development and growth of Tindale Oliver’s Transit Services from its infancy to a team of 21 dedicated transit planners and another dozen contributing transportation and urban planners. He now plays a broader corporate role with Tindale Oliver as Chief Operating Officer, but remains a working Principal, continuing to play a major role in Transit Services, including project management for larger more complex plans and projects. Relevant Project Experience General Planning Consultant Pasco County MPO | Pasco County, FL | 2008-Ongoing Project Manager/Senior Advisor Have served as General Planning Consultant since 1993, conducted 80+ task work orders including LRTPs, TDPs, corridor studies and corridor preservation, sub-area studies, ADA compliance and accessibility, impact/mobility fees, incremental development of transit services from new fixed-route system to a 9-route bus system with more than 1M annual riders. General Planning Consultant Sarasota/Manatee MPO| Sarasota/Manatee Counties, FL | 2009-Ongoing Principal-in-Charge Have served as General Planning Consultant since 2009, conduct task work orders including Congestion Management Process, Lakewood Ranch Transit Service Plan, US 41 Multimodal Emphasis Corridor Project Prioritization Process, and other miscellaneous support. General Planning Consultant Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (HART) | Hillsborough County, FL | 2002-Ongoing Principal-in-Charge/Senior Advisor Served as GPC since 2002. Conducted nearly 30 task work orders and projects, including major update of TDP, on-board surveys, alternatives analysis, bus stop facility and accessibility study, ADA technical support services, Vision 2016 TDP, scheduling efficiency review, BRT framework plan, transit cost allocation model update, ITS procurement assistance, assessment of transit emphasis corridors, NTD sampling plan for streetcar, and long-term facilities plan. William L. Ball, AICP Principal/Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Role: Senior Advisor/Quality Assurance Manager Office Location Tampa, FL Education MA, Economics, University of South Florida (1988) BS, Economics/Political Science, Florida Southern College (1986) Years of Experience 31 Years with Tindale Oliver 24 Certifications AICP #014106 (1998) Professional Affiliations American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Florida Public Transportation Association (FPTA) American Planning Association (APA) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com William L. Ball, AICP Principal/Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Transit Development Plan Pasco County Public Transportation (PCPT) | Pasco County, FL | 1999, 2002, 2005, 2008, 2013, 2018 Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager Completed the last six (1999, 2002, 2005, 2008, 2013, 2018) major updates of TDP for PCPT system. Addressed new FDOT requirements for TDPs, conducted public participation (4,000+ people), conducted special study of central county area not currently served by transit, developed phased growth strategy to accommodate differing demand for different routes. Transit Development Plan Broward County Transit (BCT) | Broward County, FL | 2013 Senior Advisor Prepared major update of 10-year TDP to meet FDOT TDP requirements. Developed 10-year vision for transit supported by realistic financial plan. Conducted extensive public participation, performance assessment of existing transit services, identification and evaluation of transit alternatives, comprehensive service and financial plan for next decade. Developed phased implementation plan and related financial plan to detail 10-year vision, convened TDP Advisory Review Committee, assessed existing plans and county baseline conditions to establish actionable situation appraisal, worked with staff to develop detailed capital and information technologies plan for TDP timeframe. Broward Vision 2100 Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2017-Ongoing Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager Created vision for Broward in 2100, intended to be aspirational, identifying and illustrating opportunities that leverage new and emerging technologies to increase transportation options, resiliency, and quality of life. Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2017-Ongoing Project Manager Worked collaboratively with MPO staff to develop Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Established vision for future transportation and growth in Broward region, ensuring that MPO is meeting requirements of US DOT’s FAST Act and Federal and State metropolitan transportation planning requirements. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Pasco County MPO | Pasco County, FL | 2018-Ongoing Senior Advisor Five-year update of Mobility 2040 LRTP. Responsible for coordinating and executing full development of 2045 LRTP. Included socio-economic data development, scenario planning, cost and revenue analysis, public engagement, develop of needs plan and development of cost affordable plan. Innovative and key aspects of plan development include incorporation of all modes of travel, consideration of new ACES technology elements, innovative public engagement, incorporation of Vision 54/56 recommendations. Mobility 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Pasco County MPO | Pasco County, FL | 1998, 2001, 2004, 2009, 2014 Project Manager Multi-year contract. Preparation of LRTP Updates, focusing on planning for a cost affordable, multimodal transportation system for the next 20 to 25 years. Update to and maintenance of transportation database of plan alternatives, including growth rate forecasts, model volume smoothing for future traffic condition projections, level of service and build-out analyses on plan alternatives, summary of performance measures, and measures of effectiveness of final plan alternatives; preparation of maps and figures for agency review and report documents. Use of Census Data within ArcGIS mapping software to identify, analyze, and produce public-friendly maps showing county environmental justice populations; assistance with preparation for and conduct of public participation workshops; preparation of map data for use in online public outreach tool for residents to rank highest priority roadway projects and provide comments. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Ali is a planner on the Community Planning and Design Team. Her experience emphasizes community-based planning processes and sustainability, with applications primarily for transportation, land use, urban design, and economic development planning. Relevant Project Experience Bayshore Community Redevelopment Plan Update Collier County | Collier County, FL | 2017-2019 Planning Support Updated Redevelopment Plan to promote a new vision for the CRA and a holistic approach to more urban, multi-modal, and arts and culture-oriented redevelopment. Tasks include public outreach; assessment of issues and opportunities; providing a detailed framework of goals, objectives, and policies to guide redevelopment; and creation of a capital and non-capital improvement plan to implement the framework. Parks and Recreation Master Plan Collier County | Collier County, FL | 2017-2018 Planning Support Developed comprehensive inventory of County's existing facilities. Reviewed plans and documents relevant to development of Final Master Plan. Facilitated public engagement; developed supply/demand & demographics/trend analysis; prepared, distributed, and evaluated needs assessment; developed vision, design guidelines, and implementation strategy and final master plan. Pinellas Park Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code Update City of Pinellas Park | Pinellas Park, FL | Ongoing Planning Support Updating City’s Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code to include a more holistic approach to redevelopment, economic development, and multimodal transportation. In addition to the restructuring and reimagining of the Comprehensive Plan, the Land Development Code is also being reviewed and refreshed to more closely align the standards with the updated Comprehensive Plan. Miami Underline Financial Analysis Friends of the Underline | Miami-Dade County, FL | 2019 Planning Support Analyzed development conditions and funding options for Miami Underline project, which consists of parks, urban trail, and arts amenities. Underline Special District study assessed capital and operating revenue sources in light of development types, development amounts, jurisdictional boundaries, and other existing conditions along Underline. Additional considerations included ease of implementation and administration of each funding tool, use and performance of funding tools in projects similar to the Underline, and potential future revenue estimates based on specific scenarios. Analysis resulted in set of feasible options to facilitate project construction completion and successful operation. Ali Ankudowich, AICP Planner Role: Planning Support Office Location Tampa, FL Education Master of Urban & Regional Planning, University of California Los Angeles (2017) BA, French Studies, Smith College (2012) Years of Experience 4 Years with Tindale Oliver 2 Certifications AICP # 31838 (2019) Professional Affiliations APA Florida 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Commerce and Technology Park Master Plan City of Fort Walton Beach | Fort Walton Beach, FL | 2017-2019 Planning Support Created Master Plan tasks included evaluation of 2016 Competitive Analysis and other pertinent data; analysis of current and anticipated market demand, economic conditions, facilitation of stakeholder engagement process to understand perspectives of property owners, business operators, workers in Park, and others throughout city and region. Illustrative Zoning Guide City of Doral | Doral, FL | 2018 Planning Support Provided planning and graphic design services to develop Zoning Guide to provide illustrations of existing zoning standards to help educate property owners, development community, and general public to specific zoning and landscape requirements for new development, infill, and redevelopment. Adaptive Reuse Project City of Doral | Doral, FL | 2018-2019 Planning Support Evaluated current conditions, validated future direction through community/stakeholder outreach and staff coordination; reviewed/assessed existing plans and policies currently guiding redevelopment/development; conducted fieldwork to document existing conditions and potential investment opportunities in study area. Addressed overall transportation patterns and existing roadway access/conditions, transit service, and bike and pedestrian connections in study area and key assets and attractions outside CRA. Heights Mobility Plan FDOT District 7 | Tampa, FL | 2018 Planning Support The plan is to improve safety and mobility in Greater Seminole Heights/Tampa Heights neighborhoods with a focus on Florida Ave and Tampa St/Highland Ave corridor between downtown Tampa and Hillsborough River. Including extensive public engagement process, identification of short-term safety and mobility improvements while working with the community and local agencies to develop transformative alternatives for the corridor that better reflect the transportation needs of the community and better serve a variety of users served. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Pasco County MPO | Pasco County, FL | 2018-Ongoing Planning Support This project is the five-year update of the Mobility 2040 LRTP. Tindale Oliver is responsible for coordinating and executing the full development of the 2045 LRTP. Tasks include socio-economic data development, scenario planning, cost and revenue analysis, public engagement, development of the needs plan, and development of the cost affordable plan. Innovative and key aspects of plan development include incorporation of all modes of travel, consideration of new ACES technology elements (autonomous, connected, electric, shared vehicles), innovative public engagement, and incorporation of Vision 54/56 recommendations. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Sarasota-Manatee MPO | Sarasota and Manatee Counties, FL | 2018-Ongoing Planning Support Conducting review of current trends and conditions MPO for LRTP update. Reviewing existing demographic and employment conditions to capture topics such as impacts of coastal and environmental considerations, commuting patterns of suburban/residential areas, location of affordable housing. Updating MPO goals, objectives and prioritization criteria for developing Cost Affordable 2045 LRTP. Ali Ankudowich, AICP Planner 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com With expertise is in the fields of transportation and traffic engineering, W.T. has 18+ years of experience and has provided transportation and traffic engineering and consulting services over a wide range of projects, including pedestrian and bicycle facility planning and engineering, ITS/ATMS projects, traffic signal retiming, and a variety of design projects such as traffic signal, roadway marking and signing, parking layout, site access, and roadway design. He has conducted ITS strategic planning, ATMS design, and applied his expertise in the design and prioritization of pedestrian and bicycle improvements, calculation of roadway and intersection levels of service; traffic signal warrants, traffic signal systemization, sight distances, and queuing; and made recommendations on traffic safety, capacity improvements, and comprehensive plan modifications. He also has developed computer graphics, simulations, exhibits, and animations for public presentations. He is the project manager for Florida DOT districtwide, county and city GEC and standalone projects and applies his management skills to a wide variety of project types. Relevant Project Experience Districtwide Safety Studies/Road Safety Audits FDOT District 4 | Districtwide | Ongoing Project Manager/Project Engineer Conduct safety studies and road safety audits in Broward, Palm Beach, Martin, St. Lucie, and Indian River counties to recommend short-, mid-, and long-term countermeasures and follow-up studies. Preliminary focus has been on pedestrian and bicycle safety issues including several “hot-spot” locations identified by FDOT Central Office. Recommendations include signing, marking, and signalization modifications; upgrades roadside features above and beyond FDOT standards; mid-block crossings and pedestrian signals at locations; relocation of transit stops; deployment of innovative improvements from the State’s Innovative Products List (IPL); ATMS upgrades; safety improvement additions to 3R and Work Program projects. Transportation System Performance Report and Action Plan Collier MPO | Naples, FL | 2019-2020 (Ongoing) Project Engineer As part of the MPO’s first bi-annual system performance report, conducted analysis of congested intersection locations using the FDOT Cap-X tool. Based on recommendations and findings, managed the operational analysis of selected strategies for identifying future project concepts. Venice Avenue at Pinebrook Rd Roundabout Analysis Sarasota County | Sarasota County, FL | 2018 Project Manager Conducted traffic operational analysis at intersections of Venice Ave at Pinebrook Rd and at Ridgewood Ave. Reviewed AM and PM peak-hour traffic volumes, as-built plans; developed 2020 and 2040 PM peak-hour traffic volume estimates, baseline Synchro file representing existing geometric conditions, operational improvement concepts; prepared base CAD files, conceptual designs, planning level cost estimates for analyzed alternatives. W.T. Bowman, P.E., RSP1 Associate Director of Transportation Engineering and Safety Role: Engineering/Safety Support Office Location Fort Lauderdale, FL Education BS, Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech (2001) Years of Experience 18 Years with Tindale Oliver 15 Certifications Florida P.E. #69132 (2009) Georgia P.E. #040908 (2015) RSP1 (2019) Professional Affiliations Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) International Municipal Signal Association (IMSA) The Florida Institute of Consulting Engineers (FICE) FES (Florida Engineering Society) American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com W.T. Bowman, P.E., RSP1 Associate Director of Transportation Engineering and Safety Collier Boulevard (CR 951) Speed Study Collier County | Collier County, FL | 2017 Project Manager Analysis to document operation of Collier Boulevard from US-41 to Davis Boulevard; review of operational speed of roadway, crash history, crash patterns, FDOT design standards, roadside obstructions and clear zone, thorough review of current literature and best practices. Intracoastal Waterway Bridge: Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Prioritization FDOT District 4 | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 2017-Ongoing Project Manager/Project Engineer Developed methodology to prioritize bridges for improvements based on presence of ped/bike facilities, vehicle and pedestrian volumes (exposure) and posted speed limits. Developed list of potential improvements for consideration for short-term (markings and signs) and long-term (require structural review). Coordinated extensively with D4’s ICWW team of members of Operations, Planning, and Design to adopt and program short-term improvements on several bridges and propose more detailed feasibility reviews for numerous bridges for improvements that may require significant structural changes and cost to implement (i.e., widening for bike lanes). Pedestrians Design for Interchange FDOT District 4 | Southeast Florida | 2019 Project Manager Reviewed interchange pedestrian and bicycle crash data for all I-95 ramps in D4, prioritizing ramps with high crash history, identified locations for review for short-term projects. Reviewed list of planned 3R projects, identified those that overlap with interchanges. Reviewed 2018-2023 FDOT Work Program to identify outer year projects (design and construction) that may be considered for inclusion and consideration of proposed treatments. Beach Mobility Study City of Fort Lauderdale | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 2017 Project Engineer Conducted comprehensive Beach Mobility Study to explore options for enhancing quality of life of residents while improving experience of visitors by evaluating ways to increase mobility for all modes of transportation and enhance options for moving within and to and from beach. Critical component of study was understanding and considering needs of non-homogeneous traveling public and how various mobility options across different transportation modes (driving, walking, biking, transit) can best serve these needs. Safety Studies and Minor Design FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | Ongoing Project Manager/Project Engineer Provide a broad range of traffic safety/operations studies and safety program management services. Support safety education and enforcement activities and systemic countermeasures approaches. Prior iterations of this districtwide contract included development of Pedestrian Safety Action Plans for three counties, development of GIS/web-based crash data systems, support and management of the District’s off-system safety program, and development of spot and systemic countermeasures to improve transportation safety. As the Consultant Project Manager, manage day-to-day operation, including programming project tasks coordinating and prioritizing with District staff, managing on- and off-site subconsultants, and ensuring schedules, deliverables, and expectations are met. Tampa Walk-Bike Plan Phase I–IV Hillsborough County MPO | Tampa, FL | 2010-2014 Project Manager/Project Engineer Identify and prioritize cost-feasible bicycle and pedestrian network projects to improve access to Tampa’s three major business centers and complete city’s overall multimodal network. A primary role was to evaluate trade-offs of various improvement concepts such as right-of-way and utility impacts, potential operational impacts, alternate strategies and corridors, and matching scope of project with the character of the neighborhood or location (i.e., shared lanes vs. bicycle path). 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Kayla is a Planner specializing in transportation planning. After completing a two-year internship in Tindale Oliver's Transit Solutions area, she started full-time with the firm as a Planner in May 2020. Her areas of focus include TDPs, transit feasibility studies, and bus stop accessibility and connectivity studies, with roles including socioeconomic data and trends analysis, transit system performance evaluation, public involvement, situation appraisal, and transit technology research. She also currently supports our grant and program compliance activities in District 7 as a member of the review team and documenting Triennial Reviews. Relevant Project Experience Transit Development Plan Major Update Lee County Transit (LeeTran) | Lee County, FL | 2019-Ongoing Planning Intern Updating TDP 2021 Major Update through 2030. Includes documentation of study area conditions and demographic characteristics, evaluation of existing transit services, development of situation appraisal and needs assessment, preparation of 10-year financial plan. Included in plan process is emphasis on building consensus for future, educating decision-makers about transit service options, deploying activities to engage more stakeholders and reach more potential riders. Tampa Arterial Bus Rapid Transit Study Hillsborough Transit Authority (HART) | Tampa, FL | 2019-Ongoing Planning Intern This feasibility study is identifying the most appropriate corridor to connect Downtown Tampa to USF Tampa Campus with premium BRT service using a combination of Florida, Nebraska, and/or Fowler avenues and help HART improve local, street-level bus service and supporting infrastructure along these three major avenues and on intersecting corridors between the two major activity centers. Transit Development Plan Update Martin County Transit (The Marty) | Martin County, FL | 2019 Planning Intern Updated the 2019-2028 TDP for Marty, Martin County’s fixed-route transit system. To ensure the updated TDP reflects the community’s vision for transit, the data analysis was complemented by a robust public outreach process consisting of a Project Review Committee, online public survey, on-board rider survey, discussion groups, stakeholder interviews, and other grassroots community events to engage permanent and seasonal residents and employees in the service area. Transit Development Plan Major Update Charlotte County | Charlotte County, FL | 2019 Planning Intern Updated the County’s TDP through 2024, including documentation of study area conditions and demographic characteristics, evaluation of existing transit services, development of situation appraisal and needs assessment, and preparation of 10-year financial plan. Included in the planning process was an emphasis on building consensus for the future, educating decision-makers about transit service options, and deploying activities to engage more stakeholders and reach more potential riders. Kayla Burrows Planner Role: Planning Support Office Location Tampa, FL Education MS, Urban and Regional Planning, University of South Florida (2020) BS, Sustainability and the Built Environment, Minor in Innovation, University of Florida (2017) Years of Experience 2 Years with Tindale Oliver 2 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Kayla Burrows Planner Transit Development Plan Major Update City of Key West | Key West, FL | 2019 Planning Intern Updated the City's TDP to ensure practical and implementable plan that reflects near-term vision for transit agency’s growth and improvement over time. Included documentation of study area conditions and demographic characteristics, evaluation of existing transit services, development of a situation appraisal and needs assessment, estimation of potential future demand using TBEST, and preparation of a 10-year financial plan to address transit and mobility needs in Key West. Transit Development Plan Pasco County Public Transportation (PCPT) | Pasco County, FL | 2019 Planning Intern Prepared a major update of Pasco County's 10-year TDP for years 2019-2028. Identified and evaluated baseline conditions in study area, evaluated demand and mobility needs, conducted a situational appraisal to understand environment in which transit system operates, prepared a public involvement plan (PIP), and conducted all public involvement activities (stakeholder interviews, on-board surveys, and discussion groups). Prepared and facilitated 10-year TDP and its adoption. Transit Development Plan Lake County (LakeXpress) | Lake County, FL | 2018 Planning Intern Developed major TDP updates by assessing overall transit-related needs in community and phased implementation plan of recommended improvements for helping address needs. Developed transit service and capital/infrastructure alternatives and associated costs and projected revenues for continuing/expanding existing services and adding new services and new capital/infrastructure improvements, developed 10-year project implementation plan and financial plan (projected costs and revenues) based on implementation plan. Transit Asset Management Plan Lake County (LakeXpress) | Lake County, FL | 2018 Planning Intern Assessed inventory of capital assets owned by LakeXpress, performed condition assessment of inventoried assets for which LakeXpress has direct ownership or capital responsibility, created description of analytical processes and decision-support tools that LakeXpress uses to estimate capital investment needs over time and develop its investment prioritization. Completed prioritized list of investments. Transit Development Plan Manatee County Area Transit (MCAT) | Manatee County, FL | 2018 Planning Intern Updated Manatee County Area Transit (MCAT) 2019–2028 TDP. Developed community planning matrix that easily summarized relevant local plans. Identified existing routes and resources that could be reallocated to advance possible route improvements to serve new areas. Conducted fare study to support needed fare modifications that could help bridge operational funding gap. Third successive major update in which Tindale Oliver has participated. 2018 Annual Progress Report for Transit Development Plan Miami-Dade Transit | Miami-Dade County, FL | 2018 -Ongoing Planning Intern Analyzed raw survey data for and assisted developing survey summaries and other deliverables. Assisted project team in other TDP related tasks. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Juan has an extensive background in the public sector where he successfully implemented enterprise geospatial information system solutions. He has experience in the development of applications and services using the latest geospatial technologies to promote integration of geospatial information and applications into various business center systems and served as Development Lead in large-scale business system implementations and enterprise system integration. He has experience in multi- jurisdictional projects and inter-governmental agreements as they pertain to technologies that promote data sharing and open systems and also worked with local transit agencies to support data collection initiatives that range from accessibility to rider surveys. Relevant Project Experience Transit Surveys Tablet application Suntran, Lynx, Votran , PSTA, HART, SunTran | Various Counties, FL | Ongoing Lead Developer Tablet-based application allows for custom surveys of riders on transit system; stores rider characteristics such as trip purpose, origin and destination, demographic, other transit-related information. Information sent in real-time back to central database for analysts to report on findings. Location Assessor Portland, ME; Gaston County, NC; Lake County Parks, FL; Punta Gorda, FL | 2013— Current Lead Developer Tablet-based application allows for custom surveys of riders on transit system; stores rider characteristics such as trip purpose, origin and destination, demographic, other transit-related information. Information sent in real-time back to central database for analysts to report on findings. Bus Stop Assessment for ADA Tool LakeXpress Transit, Space Coast Transit, Ocala SunTran | Various Counties | 2012— Current Lead Developer Android application that allows ADA compliance assessments to be performed at bus stop locations; information collected in real-time, allows agencies to see where deficiencies exist within network of stops. Photos can be taken and attached to records. Data tagged with GPS coordinates so information can be viewed via online mapping interface. Safety Studies and Minor Design FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | Ongoing Lead Developer Developed a web portal for staff to upload and maintain project data. Project data includes safety studies, traffic counts, service requests, as well as integration into a web based crash data system. Staff can analyze and report on the information stored in the project database. This portal supports safety education and enforcement activities and systemic countermeasures approaches. Juan Butler, GISP Senior Programmer Role: GIS and Application Development Office Location Tampa, FL Education BA, Geography/GIS, University of Florida (1996) Years of Experience 20 Years with Tindale Oliver 10 Professional Affiliations Urban and Regional Information Systems Association—Florida Chapter (FL-URISA) Certifications GISP #91751 (2016) Technical Skills ArcGIS Server, ArcGIS Server, ArcGIS Desktop, ArcSDE .NET Framework (C#), ASP.NET (C#), WCF, VB.NET, MVC, Web Services Silverlight, AJAX.NET Java Coldfusion HTML, XML, JavaScript, JQuery, Visual Basic Oracle Database Administration with Oracle Spatial Crystal Reports and Crystal Enterprise SQL Server with SQL Spatial XML/XSL/AJAX Microsoft IIS, Apache/ Tomcat Google API Android Mobile Development 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Juan Butler, GISP Senior Programmer Web-Based Crash Data Management Systems For various public agencies including Pinellas, Hillsborough, Collier, Pasco, Lee, Highland, Sarasota counties, FL | Ongoing Lead Developer, Database Administrator Developed Web-based Crash Data Management System for various public sector clients that allows agencies to analyze traffic crashes in their jurisdiction. The system leverages data sources from different organizations and consolidated them into a single, enterprise data model. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is used to provide the mapping and spatial analysis needed by users. Web-Based Crash Management and Studies Tracking FDOT District 4 | Various Counties, FL | Ongoing Lead Developer Developed a Web-based Crash Data and Project Tracking System for District 4 FDOT so users can access information from a standard web browser via the Crash Data Management web application that uses GIS to provide the mapping, reporting, and analysis needed by users in the District. Integrated Studies Tracking module into the system that allowed staff to enter and maintain studies in the District. Staff could monitor status and provide responses and recommendations to participating agencies. Developed automated reporting and messaging to assist with the multi-agency coordination of projects. Ridecheck— On-Demand Bus Stop application Manatee County Area Transit | Manatee County, FL | 2018 Lead Developer Application developed for tablets so users can enter location of where riders entering and exiting buses. Information entered in real-time with date and time stamps and GPS coordinates of stops; information is visual through web-based map so analysts can determine locations of where future bus stops should exist. Design Build Push Button Task Development FDOT District 7 | Districtwide | Ongoing Lead Developer SharePoint-developed site that allows FDOT staff to enter, track, and monitor tasks related to Design Build Push Button (DBPB). Allows for tagging of geographic location, document attachments, and task collaboration with other FDOT staff. Workflows developed to keep participants notified of activity related to DBPB tasks. Complete Streets Multi-Agency Project Tracking FDOT District 7 | Districtwide | 2018 Lead Developer SharePoint-based application that allows multiple agencies to enter requested projects for review by FDOT. FDOT can view, track, and respond to agency requests through web porta; all related project documents can be viewed through portal. Application allows true multi-agency collaboration through entire project lifecycle. Bicycle/Pedestrian Access to Transit FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | 2017 Lead Developer Designed and developed SharePoint site that allowed for multi-jurisdictional access to project related documents and incorporated a mapping interface that displayed locations of field reviews and engineering studies. This allowed participants to quickly access information and identify and evaluate potential improvements. Web-Based Crash Management/Analysis System FDOT District 2 | Various Counties, FL | 2015 Lead Developer Developed a Web-based Crash Data Management System for FDOT District 2. Crash data were imported from FDOT crash data system into a fully functional, enterprise GIS database so users can access information from a standard web browser. Application used GIS to provide mapping, reporting, and analysis needed by users. Developed series of tools that allowed staff to analyze crashes and view trends that occurred throughout the state road network. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Buse is a Transportation Engineer and assists with safety studies and minor design for Florida DOT District 7, safety studies and Road Safety Audits for Florida DOT District 4. She also assists with maintenance of Web-based Crash Data Management Systems (WebCDMS) for several counties throughout Florida. She is experienced with AutoCAD, GIS, MicroStation, and Synchro, speaks English and Turkish, and is semi-fluent in Spanish and American Sign Language. Relevant Project Experience Safety Studies and Minor Design FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | Ongoing Transportation Engineer Provide a broad range of traffic safety/operations studies and safety program management services. Support safety education and enforcement activities and systemic countermeasures approaches. Prior iterations of this districtwide contract included development of Pedestrian Safety Action Plans for three counties, development of GIS/web-based crash data systems, support and management of the District’s off-system safety program, and development of spot and systemic countermeasures to improve transportation safety. Safety Studies/Road Safety Audits FDOT District 4 | Southeast Florida | Ongoing Transportation Engineer Conduct safety studies and road safety audits in Broward, Palm Beach, Martin, St. Lucie, and Indian River counties to recommend short-, mid-, and long-term countermeasures and follow-up studies. Preliminary focus has been on pedestrian and bicycle safety issues including several “hot-spot” locations identified by FDOT Central Office. Recommendations include signing, marking, and signalization modifications; upgrades roadside features above and beyond FDOT standards; mid-block crossings and pedestrian signals at locations; relocation of transit stops; deployment of innovative improvements from the State’s Innovative Products List (IPL); ATMS upgrades; safety improvement additions to 3R and Work Program projects. Web-Based Crash Data Management Systems For various public agencies including Pinellas, Hillsborough, Collier, Pasco, Lee, Highland, Sarasota counties, FL | Ongoing Maintenance Support Developed Web-based Crash Data Management System for various public sector clients that allows agencies to analyze traffic crashes in their jurisdiction. The system leverages data sources from different organizations and consolidated them into a single, enterprise data model. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is used to provide the mapping and spatial analysis needed by users. Buse Cengiz Transportation Engineer Role: Engineering/Safety Support Office Location Tampa, FL Education BSCE, Civil Engineering, University of Central Florida (2019) Years of Experience 4 Years with Tindale Oliver 4 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Buse Cengiz Transportation Engineer FDOT District 2 Support FDOT District 2 | Jacksonville, FL | 2017-Ongoing Transportation Engineer Assisted FDOT District 2 in identifying crash causes, crash trends; recommended appropriate countermeasures to reduce crashes. Assisted District's Community Traffic Safety Program with various analyses, public involvement and marketing services activities. Villa City Road Safety Analysis FDOT District 5 | Location | 2019 Transportation Engineer Conducted roadway safety study along Villa City Road from SR-50 to US-27 to analyze adding paved shoulders, left-turn lanes at two intersections; reviewed speed and need for no passing zones. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Taylor is a transportation planner specializing in transportation, transit, ADA, and environmental with skills in bus and rail service and operations planning, transit needs assessments, ADA transition plans, environmental planning, and military joint land use. He has worked on all facets of transit and transportation planning, including route network modeling, long and short range planning, and public outreach, has experience using ArcGIS software and TBEST, and is trained in using AutoCad, CommunityVIZ, On The Map, and STOPS. Prior to joining Tindale Oliver, he worked on several Texas projects including the Hyperloop Texas team, Dallas-to-Houston High Speed Rail environmental impact statement, Pflugerville TDP, Bryan/College Station Demographics and Operations Study, and Rapid Transit Corridor feasibility study in Waco as well as the Duluth (MN) TDP and the Mid-County Transit Development Plan in Kittanning (PA). He has worked on development of TDPs throughout Florida, Washington State, Kansas, South Carolina, Georgia, Texas, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Utah, and Hawaii, assessed 3,000+ bus stops to meet ADA compliance, and managed operator monitoring to assure transit operators were meeting ADA standards. Relevant Project Experience Transit Development Plan Major Update Broward County Transit (BCT) | Broward County, FL | 2019 Senior Planner Prepared major update of 10-year TDP to meet FDOT TDP requirements. Developed 10- year vision for transit supported by realistic financial plan. Conducted extensive public participation, performance assessment of existing transit services, identification and evaluation of transit alternatives, comprehensive service and financial plan for next decade. Developed phased implementation plan and related financial plan to detail 10- year vision, convened TDP Advisory Review Committee, assessed existing plans and county baseline conditions to establish actionable situation appraisal, worked with staff to develop detailed capital and information technologies plan for TDP timeframe. Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2017-Ongoing Deputy Project Manager Worked collaboratively with MPO staff to develop Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Established vision for future transportation and growth in Broward region, ensuring that MPO is meeting requirements of US DOT’s FAST Act and Federal and State metropolitan transportation planning requirements. Tampa Arterial Bus Rapid Transit Study Hillsborough Transit Authority (HART) | Hillsborough County, FL | 2019-Ongoing Planner HART’s primary goal for this study is to identify the most appropriate corridor, using some combination of Florida, Nebraska, and/or Fowler avenues, to connect Downtown Tampa to the USF Tampa Campus with a premium BRT service. The study also is intended to help HART improve local, street-level bus service and supporting infrastructure along these three major avenues, as well as on intersecting corridors between the two major activity centers. Taylor Cox Assistant Project Manager/Transportation Planner Role: Planning Support Office Location Tampa, FL Education MS, Regional and Community Planning, Kansas State University (2013) Years of Experience 7 Years with Tindale Oliver 5 Professional Affiliations American Planning Association International Code Council 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Taylor Cox Assistant Project Manager/Transportation Planner System Redesign Study Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky (TANK) | Fort Wright, KY | 2019-Ongoing Planner Providing strategic planning support to assess services, service area conditions, demand, and develop service concepts for improving transit and mobility in the TANK service area of Northern Kentucky and Cincinnati, OH. Key initiatives include targeting mobility needs for rapidly growing employment and logistical services around the airport as major businesses such as Amazon Prime, DHL, Wayfair continue to invest in operations hubs at this location. In addition, addressing obstacles posed by limited river crossings and limitations of the roadway network that make it difficult to connect communities and serve the high demand for travel between Northern Kentucky and Cincinnati. Shifting socioeconomic conditions creates both a growing need for services and a challenge to funding the needed investments. Transit Development Plan Update Martin County Transit (The Marty) | Martin County, FL | 2018-Ongoing Planner Updated 2019-2028 TDP for Marty, County’s fixed-route transit system. To ensure updated TDP reflects community’s vision for transit, data analysis aspect of TDP complemented by robust public outreach process consisting of Project Review Committee, online public survey, on-board rider survey, discussion groups, stakeholder interviews, and other grassroots community events to engage permanent and seasonal residents and employees throughout Marty’s service area. Transit Development Plan Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) | Pinellas County, FL | 2014 Transit Planner Assisted in updating TDPs for consistency with applicable approved local government comprehensive plans and MPO’s LRTP. Evaluated fixed-route service levels and performance, determined future transit demand and mobility needs for the county, summarized costs and revenues, conducted workshops with PSTA’s Transit Advisory Committee to hear ideas and priorities for service enhancements Transit Development Plan Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO | Charlotte County, FL | 2014 Project Planner Updated TDP (Charlotte Rides), including documentation of study area conditions and demographic characteristics, evaluation of existing transit services, development of situation appraisal and needs assessment, preparation of 10-year financial plan. Transit Development Plan Major Update City of Key West | Key West, FL | 2019 Planner Preparing TDP Major Update to ensure practical and implementable plan that reflects near-term vision for transit agency’s growth and improvement over time. Includes planning for 10-year horizon, expanding public involvement activities, using approved demand estimation tool (e.g., TBEST), completing enhanced situation appraisal, and being more specific in financial planning approach. 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Pasco County MPO | Pasco County, FL | 2014 Transportation Planner The 2040 LRTP was developed as a multimodal transportation plan, to consider road improvements, public transportation, bicycle, pedestrian, freight, and other transportation projects. Assisted with the documentation and mapping of the MOBILITY 2040 LRTP by addressing Tampa Bay’s transportation issues and needs, including bus rapid transit, fixed-route transit, transportation, multi-use trails, bicycle facilities, and sidewalks. This particular plan also addresses land use compatibility, safety and security, congestion and mobility management, goods movement, environmental resources, and regional coordination. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Ian Debnam joined Tindale Oliver as a Planner on our Multimodal Planning Team. He brings decision making, data collection, research, analysis, and writing experience across a wide range of topics. Ian provides workable solutions to complex issues related to environmental and transportation planning efforts. His areas of specialization include feasibility and corridor studies, transit facilities and operations, socioeconomic demographic data, Environmental Justice (EJ) concerns, land-use planning, the NEPA planning process, public engagement, and GIS spatial analysis. Relevant Project Experience Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2017-Ongoing Senior Planner Tindale Oliver worked collaboratively with MPO staff to develop Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). Established vision for future transportation and growth in Broward , and ensured that the MPO is meeting requirements of US DOT’s FAST Act and federal and State metropolitan transportation planning requirements. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Sarasota-Manatee MPO | Sarasota and Manatee Counties, FL | 2018-Ongoing Senior Planner Tindale Oliver is reviewing current trends and conditions for this LRTP update. This includes reviewing existing demographic and employment conditions to capture topics such as impacts of coastal and environmental considerations, commuting patterns of suburban/residential areas, location of affordable housing, and updating MPO goals, objectives and prioritization criteria for developing Cost Affordable 2045 LRTP. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Pasco County MPO | Pasco County, FL | 2018-Ongoing Senior Planner This project is the five-year update of the Mobility 2040 LRTP. Tindale Oliver is responsible for coordinating and executing the full development of the 2045 LRTP. Tasks include socio-economic data development, scenario planning, cost and revenue analysis, public engagement, development of the needs plan, and development of the cost affordable plan. Innovative and key aspects of plan development include incorporation of all modes of travel, consideration of new ACES technology elements (autonomous, connected, electric, shared vehicles), innovative public engagement, and incorporation of Vision 54/56 recommendations. Transportation System Performance Report and Action Plan Collier MPO | Naples, FL | 2018-Ongoing Senior Planner This project includes developing the MPO’s first bi-annual system performance report, analyzing the integration of reliability measures on collector and arterial roadway system, identifying gaps in data availability, conducting analysis using FDOT Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) procedures at select built-out intersections. An action plan will be developed geared towards identifying programmable solutions and strategies to address and congestion issues. Ian Debnam, AICP Project Manager Role: Planning Support Office Location Fort Lauderdale, FL Education MA, Geography, Louisiana State University, 2009 BA, Geography, Minor in Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Louisiana Tech University, 2007 Years of Experience 10 Years with Tindale Oliver <1 Certifications/Awards AICP #29409 (2016) Professional Affiliations American Planning Association (APA) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Tampa Arterial Bus Rapid Transit Study Hillsborough Transit Authority (HART) | Tampa, FL | 2019-Ongoing Senior Planner HART’s primary goal for this study is to identify the most appropriate corridor, using some combination of Florida, Nebraska, and/or Fowler avenues, to connect Downtown Tampa to the USF Tampa Campus with a premium BRT service. The study also is intended to help HART improve local, street-level bus service and supporting infrastructure along these three major avenues, as well as on intersecting corridors between the two major activity centers. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO |Port Charlotte, FL | 2010, 2019-Ongoing Public Involvement Support Tindale Oliver will prepare the multimodal LRTP update with 2045 as the target horizon year. Updates will include transit, pedestrian facilities, bikeways, and highway components. The LRTP will include long- and short-range strategies/actions that lead to the development of an integrated multimodal transportation system to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people and goods. The plan will also address the federally required performance measures for safety, system preservation and system performance, the integration of land use, economic development, and freight and goods movement; and accessibility to airport facilities for passenger and goods. Tampa Bay Region Freight Bottleneck Analysis FDOT District 7 | Tampa, FL | 2019-Ongoing Task Lead As a task under the District 7 Modal Development contract, Tindal Oliver is performing a freight bottleneck analysis. The analysis includes reviewing available data and performance measures for assessing existing conditions, developing a methodology for evaluating and prioritizing bottlenecks, and analyzing solutions or policies to alleviate or eliminate bottlenecks for freight carriers. Arterial Connectivity Study along the I-595 Corridor FDOT District 4 | Broward County, FL | 2019-Ongoing Project Manager This study evaluates the I-595/SR-84 areas of influence of intersecting north-south arterial roadways to identify short- and long-term congestion relief improvements that can be packaged into work programs of transportation agencies for funding and implementation. South Florida Rail Corridor Master Plan Update FDOT District 4 | Broward County, FL | 2019-Ongoing Deputy Project Manager The purpose of this project is to develop a Master Plan for the corridor identifying and evaluating the many improvement and upgrades that have occurred since FDOT acquired the SFRC. The plan is intended to provide a baseline to evaluate the status of SFRC today, including current deficiencies and challenges, and the ultimate status looking at a 20-year horizon. “Speak Up Broward” Public Engagement Services: Implementing Broward’s Transit/Transportation Plans and Projects Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2013-2015* Task Lead The purpose of this project was to engage the public in a conversation about the future of Broward County’s transportation system to gather feedback on how people feel about transportation today, what they would like it to be in the future, and which potential new revenues sources they prefer for funding any additional improvements. Ian led the project’s Speakers Bureau, Mini-Grant Community Engagement Program, and online outreach efforts. He also assisted with other public coordination and outreach meetings and events, technical data collection and analysis, and the project’s televised eTownHall Meetings. *Work performed prior to joining Tindale Oliver   Ian Debnam, AICP Project Manager 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Patrick is a Planner and GIS/Data Analyst with a background in human geography, geographic information systems, spatial analysis, and data management, providing expertise in visualizing and analyzing data for a wide array of projects. He has experience and expertise in community planning and design and public finance projects, among various other transportation-related projects. Relevant Project Experience Sarasota-Manatee MPO Long Range Transportation Plan Sarasota-Manatee MPO | Sarasota and Manatee Counties, FL | 2018-Ongoing Planner/GIS Analyst Conducting review of current trends and conditions MPO for LRTP update. Reviewing existing demographic and employment conditions to capture topics such as impacts of coastal and environmental considerations, commuting patterns of suburban/residential areas, location of affordable housing. Updating MPO goals, objectives and prioritization criteria for developing Cost Affordable 2045 LRTP. Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2017-Ongoing Planner/GIS Analyst Worked collaboratively with MPO staff to develop Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Established vision for future transportation and growth in Broward region, ensuring that MPO is meeting requirements of US DOT’s FAST Act and Federal and State metropolitan transportation planning requirements. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Needs Assessment Hillsborough County MPO | Tampa, FL | 2019 Planner/GIS Analyst Conducted performance-based analysis for Good Repair and Resilience, Real Choices When Not Driving, and Major Investment programs of MPO’s LRTP. Included developing benchmark performance based on extending current funding commitments through 2045 to establish system measures, established funding commitment or desired outcome, identification of transportation needs, and priorities that resulted in targeted performance measures. Bayshore Community Redevelopment Plan Update Collier County | Collier County, FL | 2017-2019 Planner/GIS Analyst Updated Redevelopment Plan to promote new vision for CRA and holistic approach to more urban, multi-modal, and arts and culture-oriented redevelopment. Tasks included public outreach; assessment of issues and opportunities; providing detailed framework of goals, objectives, and policies to guide redevelopment; creation of capital and non- capital improvement plan to implement framework. Patrick Dougherty, AICP Planner/GIS Analyst Role: Planning Support Office Location Tampa, FL Education Masters of Urban and Regional Planning, The University of South Florida (2016) BS, Human Geography/GIS, The Pennsylvania State University (2014) Years of Experience 5 Years with Tindale Oliver 5 Certifications AICP #31949 (2019) Professional Affiliations American Planning Association (APA) American Association of Geographers (AAG) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Collier County Impact Fee Update Collier County | Collier County, FL | 2018-Ongoing Planner/GIS Analyst Multi-year contract. Developing/updating impact fees in transportation, fire rescue, EMS, schools, library, government buildings, correctional facilities, parks & recreation, and law enforcement. Community Redevelopment Plan Update City of Fort Walton Beach | Fort Walton Beach, FL | 2017-2018 Planner/GIS Analyst Updated 2015 CRA Plan vision, goals, and objectives and reflect changes within city. Developed Finding of Necessity (determined that blight existed in three surrounding areas), recommended addition of areas into CRA. Planning process included data analysis, stakeholder and community workshops, development of detailed implementation plan to guide CRA investment until sunset date. Affordable Housing Master Plan City of Doral | Doral, FL | 2017-2018 Planner/GIS Analyst Provided planning support for development of Housing Mater Plan that addresses needs for workforce housing. Developed detailed assessment of current housing stock (housing type, tenure and valuation trends), examined workforce housing trends, examined current workforce characteristics (commuting patterns, industries, incomes, etc.), assessed impacts of continued population and employment growth, developed recommendations to respond to current/future need to support continued economic development in community. SR 7 Multimodal Improvements Corridor Study Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2016 Planner/GIS Analyst Identified multimodal improvements to manage congestion and mitigate safety issues for transit users including; motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, and passengers along the SR 7 corridor. Community Redevelopment Plan City of St. Pete Beach | St. Pete Beach, FL | 2016 Planner/GIS Analyst Completed CRA Plan and negotiated with Pinellas County regarding adoption of tax increment revenue district to plan for redevelopment of the St Pete Beach Downtown and Gulf Boulevard Commercial/Resort Community Redevelopment Area over next 30 years. Good Neighbor Trail Alternatives Analysis Hernando/Citrus MPO | Hernando-Citrus Counties, FL | 2015 Planner/GIS Analyst Developed trail alignment scenarios that were technically analyzed and reviewed through extensive public outreach to identify the community-preferred alignment to complete the “Brooksville Gap” segment of the Florida Coast-to-Coast Trail. Neighborhood Planning City of Port St. Lucie | Port St. Lucie, FL | 2014-2018 Planner/GIS Analyst Developed six Neighborhood Plans to achieve the City’s strategic goals of having stable neighborhoods, quality housing, diverse economy, mobility choices, and enhanced leisure opportunities. Plans included a neighborhood involvement strategy composed of interactive workshops, surveys, and focus group meetings for each planning area. Project tasks for plans included data collection and analysis, existing conditions analysis, reviewing of existing documents, neighborhood area fieldwork, framework development, and branding to produce a final community plan and presentation. Patrick Dougherty, AICP Planner/GIS Analyst 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Richard offers significant experience in transportation planning, with emphasis areas including transit development planning, public involvement, transit finance, and alternative modal development. Prior to joining Tindale Oliver, he spent 22 years with the Public Transportation and Planning offices of FDOT Districts 1 and 7. During this time, he provided leadership and a pivotal role in the process to approve and start-up of new transit systems in Winter Haven, Charlotte, Collier, & Hernando counties. He continues to provide relative insight and hands-on technical support as he assists transit systems and FDOT with policy guidance and managerial direction. He has led the team preparing more than 24 Major TDP updates and the most recent FDOT Guidance and training courses on TDP development. Richard has extensive knowledge of federal and state management requirements, the transportation planning process, and the development of transit systems and intermodal facilities and programs. His ability to develop partnerships that accomplish results, along with his practical experience and knowledge of transit planning and government processes, enhances Tindale Oliver’s ability to develop innovative transit solutions for its clients. Relevant Project Experience Transit Development Plan Major Update Collier MPO (CAT) | Collier County, FL | 2010, 2015, 2019-Ongoing Senior Advisor/Project Manager Updating Collier Area Transit 2020-2030 TDP, includes on-board survey and non-user surveys. Outreach includes focused mobility discussion groups with business community, tourism, workforce agencies, social service agencies, health care, education. Focus of TDP on setting vision that better addresses changing needs and opportunities to serve mobility in Collier over next decade, rethinking structure of CAT network to include service delivery options to better fit demand, particularly in lower- density areas, and to connect dispersed activity centers. Includes peer and trend analyses, mapping, development of 10-year strategic plan identifying operating, planning, and capital needs, and corresponding financial plan. Long Range Transit Element Collier County MPO| Collier County, FL | 2010, 2015 Principal-in-Charge Completed Long Range Transit Element (LRTE) and LRTP Financial Element of minor update. Worked in coordination with other consultants and MPO staff. In 2015, completed LRTE and LRTP Financial Element of major LRTP update in unison with Collier Area Transit (CAT) TDP major update. Transit Development Plan Lee County Transit (LeeTran) | Lee County, FL | 2016 Project Manager Assisted with TDP major updates and created Long Range Transit Element (LRTE); used public input to refine LeeTran’s vision for public transportation, developed companion document, LeeTran 2035 Vision Plan, which includes service development guidelines and comprehensive set of premium and local bus services. Richard Dreyer, AICP, CCTM Associate Principal Role: Planning Support Office Location Bartow, FL Years of Experience 40 Years with Tindale Oliver 14 Certifications AICP #021305 (2007) Certified Community Transit Manager (2010) Professional Affiliations American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) American Planning Association (APA) Association for Commuter Transportation (ACT) Florida Public Transportation Association (FPTA) Awards Davis Productivity, 2004 FDOT Public Transportation, 2004 Florida Trust for Historic Preservation 2004 FDOT Special Achievement, 2001 FDOT Team Achievement, 1997 FDOT Sustained Superior Achievement, 1991,1996 FDOT Special Achievements 1992-1993 FDOT Team Achievement, Transit Section 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Richard Dreyer, AICP, CCTM Associate Principal Transit Development Plan—Major Update Hernando/Citrus MPO | Citrus County, FL | 2016, 2019-Ongoing Senior Advisor Prepared Citrus County Transit’s first major 10-year TDP through 2025, as required by FDOT TDP rule. Included well- coordinated public outreach process, comprehensive analysis of existing and future data, identification of improvements that can be funded based on review of revenues and unfunded needs for implementation if/when additional funding becomes available. Transit Development Plan—Major Update Hernando/Citrus MPO | Hernando County, FL | 2009, 2014, 2019 Senior Advisor Prepared TDP: assessed overall transit-related needs in area, developed phased implementation plan of recommended improvements. Included public involvement plan, review of demographic and travel behavior characteristics in area, evaluation of existing services, situation appraisal, transit demand and mobility needs, development of proposed transit enhancements, annual farebox recovery ratio report, a 10-year financial plan Transit Development Plan—Major Update Charlotte County (Charlotte Rides) | Charlotte County, FL | 2014, 2019 Principal-in-Charge Updated County’s TDP 2019 Major Update through 2024. Includes documentation of study area conditions and demographic characteristics, evaluation of existing transit services, development of situation appraisal and needs assessment, and preparation of 10-year financial plan. Included in plan process was emphasis on building consensus for future, educating decision-makers about transit service options, and deploying activities to engage more stakeholders and reach more potential riders. SCAT Plus Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Sarasota County (SCAT) | Sarasota County, FL | 2019 Principal-in-Charge Identified progress made since previous TDSP, developed plan to identify long-term goals and objectives of local TD service, developed service plan, conducted quality assurance, conducted outreach to gather input on County’s transportation needs. Transit Planning Support - Finance and Grant Management Assistance Lake County (LakeXpress) | Lake County, FL | 2019-Ongoing Principal-in-Charge Providing technical training and support in the management of state and federal transit grant programs. Assisting LakeXpress staff with the development of detailed budgets and policies to leverage and access and expend transit grant funding within regulatory allowances while leveraging the local funding, and providing sample and resources to document, report, and invoice grantor agencies correctly. Transit Planning Support - Grant/Financial/FTA Triennial Review, TAM Plan, and other Assistance The City of Ocala | Ocala, FL | 2019-Ongoing Senior Advisor Providing technical training and support in preparation and completion of the FTA Triennial Review process, and providing guidance in the management of state and federal transit grant programs. Assisting the City of Ocala staff with the development of detailed budgets and policies to leverage, access, and expend transit grant funding within regulatory allowances while leveraging the local funding, and assisting in the preparation and completion of regulatory documents, policies, procedures, and plans. Long Range Transit Element Lee County MPO | Lee County, FL | 2015, 2020 Principal-in-Charge Updated existing transit element of LRTP, included updating baseline conditions and assessing existing services/facilities, updating 25-year operating and capital needs costs from Lee Tran vision plan, developing 2040 Cost Feasible Transit Element for next 20 years. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Randy has 35 years of experience in transportation and transit planning, operations, and management, with wide-ranging experience with BRT, bus, commuter rail, light rail, flex-route, human service, and mobility-on-demand services. His work includes developing and deploying transit services, system redesign, TDPs, Comprehensive Operations Analyses, corridor studies, NEPA and FTA documentation, and the application of technology to transit. He served as Director of Planning at the Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority (LYNX) and as Planning Manager at the Potomac & Rappahannock Transportation Commission, where he was instrumental in the start-up of the Virginia Railway Express commuter rail (1992) and development of the OmniLink Flex-route, the first ITS enhanced flex-route (1994). Randy has pioneered applications of automation and information systems to advance transit scheduling, planning, operations. He created Community Shuttle (2008) to better serve lower- density markets more cost-effectively by serving both general public and ADA demand with localized mobility and first/last mile connections and worked with LYNX and its technology application developers to successfully deploy a rider e-hailing and operations optimization app applied to the LYNX NeighborLink services (2017). In 2015, he was named as one of 15 Innovators by the Community Transportation Association of America. Relevant Project Experience System Redesign Study Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky (TANK) | Fort Wright, KY | 2019-Ongoing Senior Advisor Providing strategic planning support to assess services, service area conditions, demand, and develop service concepts for improving transit and mobility in the TANK service area of Northern Kentucky and Cincinnati, OH. Key initiatives include targeting mobility needs for rapidly growing employment and logistical services around the airport as major businesses such as Amazon Prime, DHL, Wayfair continue to invest in operations hubs at this location. In addition, addressing obstacles posed by limited river crossings and limitations of the roadway network that make it difficult to connect communities and serve the high demand for travel between Northern Kentucky and Cincinnati. Shifting socioeconomic conditions creates both a growing need for services and a challenge to funding the needed investments. Transit Development Plan—Major Update Gainesville Regional Transit System (RTS) | Alachua County, FL | 2019 Project Manager Completed TDP update for RTS in Gainesville—the first major strategic transit/mobility planning effort since RTS became part of the City’s new Mobility Department. Key initiatives included expansion of microtransit service, development of strategies to enhance transit throughput along major corridors, redesign of network in response to creation of an auto-free zone on the University of Florida campus, and development of a series of general public mobility-on-demand zones to function as an overlay of the fixed -route network and address need for improved mobility and growing paratransit demand. Randall Farwell Senior Associate/Senior Transit Specialist Role: Task Lead—Transit Planning Office Location Jacksonville, FL Education Master of Urban Planning, Virginia Tech (1984) BS in Urban Studies, Texas Christian University (1982) Years of Experience 35 Years with Tindale Oliver 4 Professional Affiliations Transportation Research Board APTA Research and Technology Committee Florida Public Transit Association 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Randall Farwell Senior Associate/Senior Transit Specialist Transit Operations Planning—Skyway Conversion Jacksonville Transportation Authority (JTA)| Jacksonville, FL | 2017-Ongoing Project Manager Prepared operations plans and service expansion plans for existing Skyway operations and expansion alternatives including con version to autonomous vehicle operations. Transit Master Plan City of Asheville | Asheville, NC | 2018 Project Manager Developed a combination ten-year master plan and system redesign working with the City and a wide range of community stakeholders. The Transit Master Plan includes short-term operational improvements, programmed long-term transit network redesign improvements, capital and facility improvements, and a cost feasible financial plan. The plan was adopted unanimously by the City and included a 40 percent increase in transit funding. Route Performance Maximization System Redesign Palm Tran | West Palm Beach, FL | 2019 Project Manager Managed a complex redesign of the Palm Tran transit network. Translated and refined a high level network concept into an operationally deployable and cost neutral major service change (October 2018). Recommendations included longer term improvements that require more funding. The new transit network streamlines routes; improves connectivity, frequency, and span; and adds a microtransit service in the Glades. Following deployment of RPM service changes, ridership increased, customer response was positive, and on-time performance improved from 65% to 85%. Transit Development Plan Space Coast Area Transit | Brevard County, FL | 2017 Project Manager Managed major update of TDP for the Space Coast Area Transit system with a focus on expanding and refining the transit network and service delivery options to better capture growing suburban populations and persons aging in place. BRT Technical Services Greater Richmond Transit Company | Richmond, VA | 2016* Project Manager Managed technical service design efforts for GRTC parallel to the A/E design of the Broad Street BRT. Efforts included transit network redesign to preserve and improve transfers between key routes and the BRT. Developed pedestrian safety recommendations at BRT stations. Produced operating requirements, operating plan, and O&M costs. Conducted Title VI analysis for service changes and fare structure changes. Go Glades Mobility on Demand Palm Tran | West Palm Beach, FL | 2019-Ongoing Project Manager In conjunction with the Palm Tran RPM bus network redesign and the Rural Transit Initiative study conducted for FDOT District 4, developed and deployed a new general public mobility-on-demand (MOD) service for Palm Tran Connection, the agency’s paratransit operation. The service was launched December 2018 as a set of four point deviation services serving the rural cities of Belle Glade, South Bay, and Pahokee in the far western area of the county to improve access to opportunities. The services were developed as a complement to the ADA door-to-door service with incentives to shift ADA customers to Go Glades for persons for whom curb-to-curb solutions are acceptable. The services were designed to transition to a full point-to-point MOD service (no routes and real-time requests) following the procurement of new scheduling software. The Go Glades services are currently in a one-year pilot with the intent of expanding the service concept to the rest of the Palm Tran service area specifically to 1) address local mobility and first/last-mile connectivity in hard to access areas, and 2) provide a more nimble and cost-effective method to serve growing paratransit demand. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Bo has experience in field work in GIS, travel demand modeling, WebCDMS, AutoCAD, and data collection and analysis and provides support to engineers as well as planners in GIS mapping, traffic forecasting, crash data reviews, collision diagrams, and developing sorted data tables. He also provides management and assistance in field data collection, including vehicle and pedestrian counts, and has supported engineers, programmers, and planners on a variety of study tasks. Relevant Project Experience Safety Studies and Minor Design FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | Ongoing Info Systems Intern Provide a broad range of traffic safety/operations studies and safety program management services. Support safety education and enforcement activities and systemic countermeasures approaches. Prior iterations of this districtwide contract included development of Pedestrian Safety Action Plans for three counties, development of GIS/web-based crash data systems, support and management of the District’s off-system safety program, and development of spot and systemic countermeasures to improve transportation safety. Safety Studies/Road Safety Audits FDOT District 4 | Southeast Florida | Ongoing Info Systems Intern Conduct safety studies and road safety audits in Broward, Palm Beach, Martin, St. Lucie, and Indian River counties to recommend short-, mid-, and long-term countermeasures and follow-up studies. Preliminary focus has been on pedestrian and bicycle safety issues including several “hot-spot” locations identified by FDOT Central Office. Recommendations include signing, marking, and signalization modifications; upgrades roadside features above and beyond FDOT standards; mid-block crossings and pedestrian signals at locations; relocation of transit stops; deployment of innovative improvements from the State’s Innovative Products List (IPL); ATMS upgrades; safety improvement additions to 3R and Work Program projects. Collier MPO Transportation System Report and Action Plan Collier County MPO | Collier County | 2019 Info Systems Intern Compiled local agency data for Collier MPO to develop a consolidated network for the Congestion Management Process. This network was then used to summarize system conditions for congestion related to traffic volumes and traffic crashes. Using GIS spatial relationships, an association of the roadway segments and intersections was made with recent traffic crashes to identify high frequency and high crash rate locations for further analysis of causes. Gerald “Bo” Galloway Information Systems Intern Role: Planning Support Office Location Tampa, FL Education BA, International Relations, University of South Florida, 2017 Graduate Certificate, GIS Summer, 2020 Masters of Urban and Regional Planning, University of South Florida, Spring 2021 Years of Experience 2 Years with Tindale Oliver 2 Certifications FAA UAV Drone Certification #4311349 (2019) FSUTMS Executive Summary Model Training 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com FDOT District 7 Support FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, Fl | 2018-Ongoing Info Systems Intern Worked in conjunction with FDOT officials to compile 5+ years of wrong way driving crash data in order to identify and prioritize high incident corridors and locations. GIS spatial relationships were developed and applied in order to present summary tables, monthly statistics and various maps. FDOT District 2 Support FDOT District 2 | Jacksonville, FL | 2018-Ongoing Engineer Technician Assisted FDOT District 2 in identifying crash causes, crash trends; recommended appropriate countermeasures to reduce crashes. Assisted District's Community Traffic Safety Program with various analyses, public involvement and marketing services activities. St. Lucie County TPO Traffic Database Management System St. Lucie TPO | St. Lucie County, Fl | 2019-Ongoing Info Systems Intern Quality checked and processed subconsultant traffic count data countywide. Traffic count data was formatted, analyzed and manually uploaded onto the Traffic Database Management System (TDMS) where it was then able to be used by St. Lucie TPO officials in identifying growth trends and relevant traffic characteristics. Gerald “Bo” Galloway Information Systems Intern 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Sarah assisted with developing alternatives evaluation methodologies for the Cobb County 10X Implementation Plan and the Valdosta Transit Implementation Study, was involved in survey analysis and results write-up for the Miami-Dade Transit Development Plan and provided GIS support on a variety of other projects. Previously, she was a GIS Analyst for Echologics, an acoustical engineering firm that specializes in water main condition assessment and leak detection. She also has public sector experience providing GIS support to various departments at Polk County and the Southwest Florida Water Management District. Relevant Project Experience TBARTA Envision 2030 Regional TDP TBARTA | Tampa, FL | 2019-Ongoing Planner Developing agency’s first Regional Transit Development Plan (Envision 2030: The Future of Transit in Tampa Bay), strategic guide for TBARTA and partner agencies for transit in five-county Tampa Bay region for FYs 2021-2030. Also focuses on establishing organizational and financial strategy and facilitating regional coordination with other transit operators. Transit Development Plan Lake County (LakeXpress) | Lake County, FL | 2018 Planner Developed major TDP updates by assessing overall transit-related needs in community and phased implementation plan of recommended improvements for helping address needs. Developed transit service and capital/infrastructure alternatives and associated costs and projected revenues for continuing/expanding existing services and adding new services and new capital/infrastructure improvements, developed 10-year project implementation plan and financial plan (projected costs and revenues) based on implementation plan. Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Hillsborough MPO | Hillsborough County, FL | 2018 Project Manager Assisted MPO staff with public involvement program to determine potential gaps in existing transportation services supporting TD community in Hillsborough County. Updated TDSP based on current demographic data and financial information, prepared for and attended various meeting with stakeholders, prepared final TDSP report. Hillsborough Annual CTC Evaluation Hillsborough County MPO | Tampa, FL | 2017, 2018 Project Manager Updated evaluation of CTC for 7/1/2016-6/30/17. Reviewed supporting documentation and data provided for evaluation of TD program in Hillsborough County. Conducted performance evaluation using data and CTC Client Survey results, data analyzed against performance standards developed by CTC and TDCB in the 2016-2021 TDSP. Sarah Goolsby, GISP Project Manager Role: Task Lead—TD Planning Office Location Tampa, FL Education Graduate Certificate, Geographic Information Systems, University of South Florida BS, Environmental Science & Policy, University of South Florida (2008) Years of Experience 10 Years with Tindale Oliver 5 Certifications GISP #67982 (2015) Professional Affiliations Florida Society of Geographers Urban & Regional Information Systems Association—Florida Chapter 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Sarah Goolsby, GISP Project Manager Transit Development Plan Lower Savannah Council of Governments (LSCOG) | Aiken County, SC | 2017 Project Manager Developed a plan with both short-term operational improvements as well as long-term transit improvements for the Best Friend Express in Aiken, SC. Transit Development Plan Heartland Regional TPO | Highlands County, FL | 2017 Planner Completed initial feasibility and 2017 Major TDP update for recently-designated urbanized area, which has provided TD paratransit services for years; TDP evaluated need and potential for implementing new urban public transit service and system. With extensive public input, plan identified local needs and transit preferences for fixed-route, flex, and on-demand service. Strategic vision within TDP used to guide planning, development, and implementation of potential future public transportation service within urbanized area. Plan received 2018 Rural Achievement Regional Leadership and Excellence Award from National Association of Regional Councils and Florida American Planning Association 2018 Project Award. Transit Development Plan Major Update Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) | Pinellas County, FL | 2015 GIS Analyst Assisted in updating TDPs for consistency with applicable approved local government comprehensive plans and MPO’s LRTP. Evaluated fixed-route service levels and performance, determined future transit demand and mobility needs for the county, summarized costs and revenues, conducted workshops with PSTA’s Transit Advisory Committee to hear ideas and priorities for service enhancements. Transit Development Plan Major Update Lee County Transit (LeeTran) | Lee County, FL | 2016 Planner Assisted with TDP major updates and created Long Range Transit Element (LRTE); used public input to refine LeeTran’s vision for public transportation, developed companion document, LeeTran 2035 Vision Plan, which includes service development guidelines and comprehensive set of premium and local bus services. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Pasco County MPO | Pasco County, FL | 2018-Ongoing Planner Five-year update of Mobility 2040 LRTP. Responsible for coordinating and executing full development of 2045 LRTP. Included socio-economic data development, scenario planning, cost and revenue analysis, public engagement, develop of needs plan and development of cost affordable plan. Innovative and key aspects of plan development include incorporation of all modes of travel, consideration of new ACES technology elements, innovative public engagement, incorporation of Vision 54/56 recommendations. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Needs Assessment Hillsborough County MPO | Tampa, FL | 2019 Planner Conducting performance-based analysis for Good Repair and Resilience, Real Choices When Not Driving, and Major Investment programs of MPO’s LRTP. Includes developing benchmark performance based on extending current funding commitments through 2045 to establish system measures, establishing funding commitment or desired outcome, identification of transportation needs and priorities that result in targeted performance measures. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Steve is a certified planning professional with experience in transportation planning and GIS applications including travel demand modeling using Cube Voyager models, and geospatial analysis using ESRI ArcGIS. He has conducted numerous traffic impact studies, general traffic analysis, freight corridor screenings, crash data analysis, and other similar projects. Relevant Project Experience 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Pasco County MPO | Pasco County, FL | 2018-Ongoing Sr. Planner Five-year update of Mobility 2040 LRTP. Responsible for coordinating and executing full development of 2045 LRTP. Included socio-economic data development, scenario planning, cost and revenue analysis, public engagement, develop of needs plan and development of cost affordable plan. Innovative and key aspects of plan development include incorporation of all modes of travel, consideration of new ACES technology elements, innovative public engagement, incorporation of Vision 54/56 recommendations. City of Sarasota Parking Study - The Bay Project and Rosemary District City of Sarasota Parking Division | Sarasota, FL | 2019 Sr. Planner Quantified parking demand for proposed new Van Wezel Performing Arts Center, estimated number of parking spaces required for proposed on-site parking facility, as derived through inventory of existing and proposed off-site parking available for shared- use during events. Buildout Model Update Pasco County MPO | Pasco County, FL | 2019 Project Manager/Sr. Planner Updated all necessary components of buildout model including roadway network and socio-economic (land use) data. Model runs and results will be reported, model training will be conducted. 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Amendment Collier County MPO | Collier County, FL | 2018 Task Manager Analyzed impacts to cost feasible LRTP based on revised growth assumptions of major planned development. Analysis included review of countywide growth projections through 2040, reallocating future growth, developing transportation alternatives, modeling performance of transportation system. Funding Analysis for Whippoorwill Lane Collier County | Collier County, FL | 2019 Sr. Planner/Travel Demand Modeler Reviewed planned improvements to Whippoorwill Lane to determine impact fee districts likely to benefit from improvements. Proposed improvements will extend Whippoorwill Ln and Marbella Lakes Dr to connect with intersection. Additional roadway and intersection improvements proposed along existing and proposed sections to provide additional connection between Pine Ridge Rd and Livingston Rd with improved access to both roads for land uses. Steve Infanti, AICP Assistant Project Manager/ Senior Planner Role: Task Lead—Transportation Statistics Office Location Tampa, FL Education Graduate Certificate, GIS Applications Specialist, Sault College, ON (2000) BA, Geography, Laurentian University (1994) Years of Experience 17 Years with Tindale Oliver 6 Certifications AICP #022648 (2008) Professional Affiliations American Planning Association, American Institute of Certified Planners Florida Statewide Modeling Taskforce Tampa Bay Transportation Applications Group 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Steve Infanti, AICP Assistant Project Manager/Senior Planner Dove Ave and Clark Rd Comprehensive Plan Amendment Evaluation Sarasota County | Sarasota County, FL | 2018 Project Manager Defined study area for reporting model volumes, including all classified roadways deemed affected by proposed changes to Comprehensive Plan. Evaluated base year model performance, methodology statement, network coding review, code comprehensive plan network changes, executed 2040 model run with proposed changes and alternative scenarios. Auteur Traffic Study City of Sarasota | Sarasota, FL | 2018-2019 Project Manager/Sr. Planner Conducted traffic impact analysis to identify key traffic issues and study methodology. Estimated traffic volumes generated by proposed land uses using nationally-published trip generation rates. Project traffic distributed and assigned to vicinity street system. Concurrency analysis roadway segments identified, existing PM peak hour traffic volumes in project vicinity collected and adjusted to reflect 2018 peak season conditions. Detailed intersection and roadway LOS analysis of identified study network and other areas completed using analytical methods outlined in Sarasota Concurrency Calculation Methodology. Good Neighbor Trail Feasibility Study Hernando/Citrus Metropolitan Planning Organization | Hernando/Citrus Counties, FL | 2015-2016 Planning Support Developed trail alignment scenarios that were technically analyzed and reviewed through extensive public outreach to identify the community-preferred alignment to complete the “Brooksville Gap” segment of the Florida Coast-to-Coast Trail. SR 7 Multimodal Corridor Study Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2016 Planner Through public engagement and technical analysis, identify short and mid-term improvements to enhance mobility and livability along SR 7/US 441. Improvements along the county’s busiest transit corridor are expected to include “premium bus” treatments, multimodal network enhancements, and intersection safety projects. Ridge Road Extension Analysis Pasco County | Pasco County, FL | 2015 Transportation Planner, Travel Demand/Hurricane Evacuation Modeler Analysis of alternatives to extending Ridge Road undertaken at the request for information from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to justify need for the proposed Ridge Road Extension. Tindale Oliver’s responsibilities included analyses of general mobility concerns on area roadway network, as well as analyses of Hurricane Evacuation zones, study area, and evacuation clearance times. Seventeen alternatives were modeled using Tampa Bay Regional Planning Model to examine mobility concerns for each alternative, with each alternative also being modeled using the Statewide Regional Evacuation Study Program Model to examine clearance times of evacuation zones and the general study area. Long Range Transportation Plan St. Lucie TPO | St. Lucie County, FL | 2014-2015 Planner Construct and maintain transportation database of plan alternatives, provide direction on future alternative model development, develop growth rate forecasts and model volume smoothing for future traffic condition projections, analyze level of service and build-out on plan alternatives, prepare maps and figures for agency review and report documents. 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Hernando/Citrus MPO | Hernando and Citrus Counties, FL | 2014 Planner Provided production support for MPO UPWP, including update of LRTP, development of roadway alternatives to create cost and revenue projections, Needs Plan, and Cost Affordable Plan. Study included processing travel demand model output/ forecasting future conditions. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Chris has knowledge and applied experience in a wide range of urban and transportation planning issues. His expertise includes multimodal transportation planning, complete streets, corridor planning, and traffic safety. In addition to his understanding of various planning issues, he possesses a proficiency in GIS applications and database management. His experience and skill set allow him to apply creative solutions to innovative and unique multimodal transportation system projects for the communities of today and tomorrow. Relevant Project Experience 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Needs Assessment Hillsborough County MPO | Tampa, FL | 2019 Planning Support Conducted performance-based analysis for Good Repair and Resilience, Real Choices When Not Driving, and Major Investment programs of MPO’s LRTP. Included developing benchmark performance based on extending current funding commitments through 2045 to establish system measures, established funding commitment or desired outcome, identification of transportation needs, and priorities that resulted in targeted performance measures. Sanibel Shared Use Master Plan Lee MPO | City of Sanibel, FL | 2019 Project Manager Provided analysis and identification of proposed facilities to address gaps in system, new facilities that may be needed to provide access between neighborhoods and area attractions, and improvements needed to enhance safety and use of existing bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. Developed update to 2009 Bike Master Plan, reviewed existing documentation to identify recommendations for updates needs assessment, field observations and review and update of existing recommendations and implementation process; reviewed existing funding sources to evaluate existing sources and recommend additional opportunities, developing draft and final plan. Heights Mobility Plan FDOT District 7 | Tampa, FL | 2018 Project Manager The plan is to improve safety and mobility in Greater Seminole Heights/Tampa Heights neighborhoods with a focus on Florida Ave and Tampa St/Highland Ave corridor between downtown Tampa and Hillsborough River. Including extensive public engagement process, identification of short-term safety and mobility improvements while working with the community and local agencies to develop transformative alternatives for the corridor that better reflect the transportation needs of the community and better serve a variety of users served. Bicycle and Pedestrian Access to Transit Safety Studies FDOT District 7 | Hillsborough County, FL | 2013-2018 Assistant Project Manager Identified high-ridership locations with bicycle and pedestrian safety and/or mobility issues and conducted field reviews and other engineering studies to identify and evaluate potential improvements. Considered access to transit on controlled-access highways and innovative treatments such as “bus islands” and bus queue-jump lanes. Christopher Keller, AICP Project Manager Role: Task Lead—Sub-Area / Corridor and Multi- Modal (Bike/Ped) Office Location Tampa, FL Education BA, Geography, University of South Florida (2007) Years of Experience 12 Years with Tindale Oliver 12 Certifications AICP #025559 (2011) Professional Affiliations > American Planning Association (APA) > American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) > Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Christopher Keller, AICP Project Manager West Tampa Multimodal Plan Hillsborough County MPO | Hillsborough County, FL | 2018 Project Manager The West Tampa Multimodal Plan is an effort to identify opportunities to enhance the multimodal network throughout West Tampa by improving connections between existing and planned pedestrian and bicycle facilities and identifying opportunities to implement complete streets strategies. Tasks include an inventory and evaluation of existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities and the development of recommendations that include trail connections, bicycle boulevards, and improved connections. US 17 Multimodal Corridor Planning Study River to Sea TPO | Volusia County, FL | 2017 Project Manager Tindale Oliver worked with the River to Sea TPO, FDOT District 5, and local municipalities along the US 17 corridor to identify opportunities to improve safety, mobility, accessibility, and modal choice for all users of the US 17 corridor though western Volusia County. The corridor study was designed to build on previous study efforts to identify and develop recommendations and strategies that could be progressed into implementable projects. Jackson Street Lane Elimination/Cycle Track Feasibility Study FDOT District 7 | Tampa, FL | 2017 Project Manager Development and implementation of a varied public outreach effort that has included one-on-one meetings with stakeholders, various agency and local planning group meetings, and a public workshop. Technical and facility design guidance through the development of the proposed two-way bicycle facility. Technical support in preparing the required traffic analysis to support the proposed elimination of a travel lane through part of the project corridor. SR 7 Multimodal Improvements Corridor Study Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2016 Project Manager Through public engagement and technical analysis, identify short and mid-term improvements to enhance mobility/ livability along SR 7/US 441, county’s busiest transit corridor; includes “premium bus” treatments, multimodal network enhancements, and intersection safety projects. Citywide Mobility Plan City of Sarasota | Sarasota, FL | 2015 Project Manager Assisted with establishment of mobility districts based on City’s existing land use density/diversity and vision and multimodal options by which to vary the City’s development review process. Identify feasible bicycle/pedestrian projects to enhance multimodal network and develop city multimodal impact fee as an alternative to countywide roadway-only transportation impact fee. Tampa Walk–Bike Plan Phase I-IV Hillsborough County MPO | Tampa, FL | 2010-2014 Assistant Project Manager Identified and prioritized cost-feasible bicycle and pedestrian network projects to improve access to Tampa’s three major business centers and complete city’s overall multimodal network. Developed 20-mile “Green ARTery” urban trail system through Central Tampa to connect downtown with riverfront parks and easements, community parks and greenspaces, and other community assets. Pedestrian Safety Action Plan Hillsborough County | Hillsborough County, FL | 2009–2010 Assistant Project Manager Assisted with development of Pedestrian Safety Action Plan, including intensive analysis of pedestrian crash data, identification of infrastructure, planning, education, and enforcement strategies to reduce pedestrian crashes and fatalities. Coordination of participation from City, County, and MPO staff and law enforcement, development of foundation for Tampa Bay Area to receive $0.5 million in NHTSA grant funds. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Hélène joined Tindale Oliver’s Multimodal Planning Team after serving as a planning assistant for the City of New Westminster, British Columbia. She has experience in interpreting land development regulations to provide detailed information to both department staff and the public, as well as in conducting research, collecting and analyzing data, and gathering input from professionals and stakeholders on multimodal transportation systems and complete streets initiatives to draft recommendations for land use policy. Hélène also worked collaboratively with contractors, engineers, planners, the public, property owners, and businesses in order to complete transportation infrastructure projects within budget and on schedule, and used strong interpersonal and communication skills to lead well attended and successful community transportation mapping workshops, public engagement events, advisory committee meetings and community dialogue sessions. She also has prepared successful grant applications and acquired corporate sponsorships and bursaries for infrastructure, transportation, and recreation projects. Relevant Project Experience Transportation System Performance Report and Action Plan Collier MPO | Naples, FL | 2018-Ongoing Planner Developed first bi-annual system performance report. Analyzing integrating reliability measures on collector and arterial roadway system, identifying gaps in data availability, conducting analysis using FDOT Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) procedures at select built-out intersections. Action plan will be developed geared towards identifying programmable solutions and strategies to address and congestion issues. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO |Port Charlotte, FL | 2019-Ongoing Planner Preparing multimodal 2045 LRTP update, including transit, pedestrian facilities, bikeways, and highway components. LRTP will include long and shortrange strategies/actions leading to development of integrated multimodal transportation system to facilitate safe and efficient movement of people and goods and address federally-required performance measures for safety, system preservation and system performance, integration of land use, economic development, and freight and goods movement, accessibility to airport facilities for passenger and goods. Sanibel Shared Use Master Plan Lee MPO | City of Sanibel | 2019 Planner Providing analysis and identification of proposed facilities to address gaps in system, new facilities that may be needed to provide access between neighborhoods and area attractions, and improvements needed to enhance safety and use of existing bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. Developing update to 2009 Bike Master Plan, reviewing existing documentation to identify recommendations for updates needs assessment, field observations and review and update of existing recommendations and implementation process; reviewing existing funding sources to evaluate existing sources and recommend additional opportunities, developing draft and final plan. Hélène Miles Planner Role: Planning Support Office Location Tampa, FL Education BA, Geography w/ Specialization in Urban Planning, Environment & Sustainability, University of British Columbia (2014) MATI® Community Planning for Local Government Professionals, Capilano University & Local Government Management Association of British Columbia (2016) Years of Experience 5 Years with Tindale Oliver 1 Professional Affiliations American Planning Association Congress for New Urbanism Awards Planning Institute of British Columbia Silver Award for Excellence in Policy Planning - Small Town & Rural Areas (2018) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Hélène Miles Planner 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Pasco County MPO | New Port Richey, FL | 2018-Ongoing Planner This project is the five-year update of the Mobility 2040 LRTP. Tindale Oliver is responsible for coordinating and executing the full development of the 2045 LRTP. Tasks include socio-economic data development, scenario planning, cost and revenue analysis, public engagement, development of the needs plan, and development of the cost affordable plan. Innovative and key aspects of plan development include incorporation of all modes of travel, consideration of new ACES technology elements (autonomous, connected, electric, shared vehicles), innovative public engagement, and incorporation of Vision 54/56 recommendations. City of Sarasota Parking Study - The Bay Project and Rosemary District City of Sarasota Parking Division | Sarasota, FL | 2019 Planner Quantified parking demand for proposed new Van Weezel Performing Arts Center, estimated number of parking spaces required for proposed on-site parking facility, as derived through inventory of existing and proposed off-site parking available for shared-use during events. Multi Modal Emphasis Corridor Analysis Sarasota/Manatee MPO | Location | 2018-Ongoing Planner Reviewing/updating US 41 MMEC plan program based on findings and recommendations. Includes review of past and current projects using MPO’s project priorities, Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), and local capital improvement programs to identify gaps in US-41 corridor. Incorporating safety, mobility, and environmental and livability aspects into US-41 Gap and Safety Analysis. Using available data to evaluate high crash locations, mobility data, and environmental and livability factors to prioritize areas along corridor for further assessment to improve safety, mobility, and environmental and livability performance measures. Roadway Context Classification FDOT District 7 | Tampa, FL | 2018-Ongoing Planner In 2014, FDOT adopted policy calling for planning, design, construction, and operation of context-sensitive system of Complete Streets to serve users of all ages and abilities. Context classification system used to describe land use patterns in relation to roadways throughout state, helps to emphasize need to support all users within complete network of streets according to each street’s existing and desired future context and transportation characteristics. This project focused specifically on classifying State roadways using FDOT’s Context Classification system. Prior to joining Tindale Oliver Planning Assistant, City of New Westminster British Columbia, Canada | January 2018-August 2018* Managed and reviewed development applications for multi-family and single family development projects and analyzed development applications, permits and plans for compliance with City comprehensive studies, development plans, and land development regulations. Researched, collected, and analyzed data to present findings and trends to senior planners regarding sensitive policy initiatives including the environmental and community impacts of transportation plans and projects. Facilitated interdepartmental reviews of development proposals and met with project teams (engineers, architects, planners, realtors) to review pre-application development proposals and development permits. Proficiently used Microsoft Office Suite and Adobe Creative Suite to manage development files, format reports and posters, compile, evaluate, and analyze data. Used strong communication skills to write and deliver comprehensive reports, engaging presentations, and in-depth research for senior staff.  *Worked performed prior to joining Tindale Oliver 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Demian has served as a planner, project manager, and Principal-in-Charge on a wide range of transportation planning and engineering projects for city and county governments, MPOs, the Florida DOT, and the Federal Highway Administration. His areas of expertise include GIS/transportation data management, traffic safety and safety program management, bicycle and pedestrian safety and mobility, multimodal corridor and sub-area studies, and growth management/policy planning. He also has provided support to long range transportation planning projects as well as land use/ community planning projects. In addition to his management responsibilities for Tindale Oliver’s Corridor/Sub-Area and Traffic Safety service areas, he serves as an instructor for FHWA’s “Focused Approach to Pedestrian Safety” and has provided technical assistance and led “Designing for Pedestrian Safety” workshops for FHWA. Relevant Project Experience Local Road Safety Plan Collier County MPO | Collier County, FL | 2019-Ongoing Principal-in-Charge Developing comprehensive LRSP with input from broad range of stakeholders in strategic planning process through public input meetings, workshops with focus groups, partnerships with federal, State, and local agencies. Outcome will prioritize opportunities to improve highway safety, budget programs and projects, implement highway safety strategies, and reduce loss of life, injuries, and property damage while enhancing performance and capacity of county-wide street and highway network. Safety Studies and Minor Design FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | Ongoing Principal-in-Charge Provide a broad range of traffic safety/operations studies as well as safety program management services. Support safety education and enforcement activities and systemic countermeasures approaches. Prior iterations of this districtwide contract included development of Pedestrian Safety Action Plans for three Counties and development of GIS/web-based crash data systems. Safety Studies/Road Safety Audits FDOT District 4 | Southeast Florida | Ongoing Principal-in-Charge Conduct safety studies and road safety audits in Broward, Palm Beach, Martin, St. Lucie, and Indian River counties to recommend short-term countermeasures and follow-up studies focused on pedestrian safety issues, including several “hot-spot” locations identified by FDOT Central Office. Outcomes include sign, pavement marking, lighting, and signalization upgrades. Demian Miller, AICP Principal Role: Task Lead—Safety Office Location Tampa, FL Education MA, Urban and Regional Planning, University of Florida BA, Political Science, University of Florida Years of Experience 19 Years with Tindale Oliver 17 Certifications AICP #021871 (2007) Professional Affiliations American Planning Association (APA) Association of Traffic Safety Information Professionals (ATSIP) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Demian Miller, AICP Principal Bayshore Community Redevelopment Plan Update Collier County | Collier County, FL | 2017-2019 Principal-in-Charge Updated Redevelopment Plan to promote new vision for CRA and holistic approach to more urban, multi-modal, and arts and culture-oriented redevelopment. Tasks included public outreach; assessment of issues and opportunities; providing detailed framework of goals, objectives, and policies to guide redevelopment; creation of capital and non-capital improvement plan to implement framework. SR 7 Multimodal Corridor Study Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2016 Project Manager Through public engagement and technical analysis, identify short and mid-term improvements to enhance mobility and livability along SR 7/US 441, the county’s busiest transit corridor, which are expected to include “premium bus” treatments, multimodal network enhancements, and intersection safety projects. Citywide Mobility Plan City of Sarasota | Sarasota, FL | 2014 Project Manager Establish mobility districts based on the City’s existing land use density/diversity, land use vision, and multimodal options by which to vary the its development review process. Identify feasible bicycle and pedestrian projects to enhance the multimodal network and develop a city multimodal impact fee as an alternative to the countywide roadway-only transportation impact fee. Bicycle/Pedestrian Access to Transit Safety Studies FDOT District 7 | Hillsborough County, FL | 2013-2018 Project Manager Identify high-ridership locations with bicycle and pedestrian safety and/or mobility issues and conduct field reviews and other engineering studies to identify and evaluate potential improvements. This districtwide contract also considers access to transit on controlled access highways and innovative treatments such as “bus islands” and bus queue-jump lanes. Fletcher Avenue Complete Street Design Hillsborough County | Tampa, FL | 2011 Principal-In-Charge Developed mid-block crossing traffic control strategies near University of South Florida campus with significant history of bike/ped crashes, including determination of proper speed limit setting, evaluation of access management impacts, preparation of design plans for five mid-block crossings, including Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons mounted overhead along with pedestrian-actuated pedestrian lighting to improve crosswalk illumination. Pedestrian Safety Action Plan Hillsborough County | Hillsborough County, FL | 2009–2010 Project Manager Developed Pedestrian Safety Action Plan, including intensive analysis of pedestrian crash data, identification of infrastructure, planning, education, and enforcement strategies to reduce pedestrian crashes and fatalities. Coordinated participation from City, County, and MPO staff and law enforcement, developed foundation for Tampa Bay Area to receive $0.5 million in NHTSA grant funds. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Robert recently joined Tindale Oliver’s Multimodal Planning Team. He is an accomplished urban planner with considerable experience in the transportation planning process, including regulatory, policy, and enforcement, and he is experienced with ArcGIS and SketchUp. Relevant Project Experience Planner, Keith & Associates Fort Lauderdale, FL | September 2019–March 2020* Led preparation of planning documents and regulatory permitting/applications; conducted project management duties including coordination with all in-house and external disciplines, assisted with general planning tasks as required by project managers. Mobility Planner, City of Fort Lauderdale Fort Lauderdale, FL | April 2017–September 2019* New Mobility and Emerging Technologies – Served as project manager for first permanent dockless scooter permit program in Florida; included coordinating with interdisciplinary partners and four permitted operators, public education, receiving and digesting ridership data to identify origin-destination and other trends, studying and influencing state and national best practices; stayed current on professional publications and Florida Statutes to understand how new trends impact governmental programs and regulations; participated in Emerging Transportation Technologies Commission, helping to research and better understand how new technology, including Mobility as a Service (MaaS) providers, can benefit a growing mobility ecosystem. Master Planning, Boards and Committees, and Public Engagement – Served as project manager for preparation and production of major corridor and neighborhood master planning efforts, including Beach Mobility Study, CRA-funded Northwest CRA Mobility Study, and Las Olas Corridor Study; led public engagement effort to implement master plans, including SE 17th Street Working Group and Las Olas Working Group; developed innovative “Planning in the Park” approach to public input to better reach disadvantaged populations. Site Plan Review – Served as initial Transportation and Mobility Department representative for conceptual site plan review, promoting progressive planning concepts among adaptive reuse and new development projects; assisted with review of NE 4th Street Bike Lanes and Las Olas Protected Bike Lanes Pilot projects. Budget and Grants – Stakeholder for Federal grant-funded $2.3M Mobility Hub project; led development and project management of grants and grant applications, including AARP Community Challenge Grant and Broward County Art of Community Grant; assisted with development of departmental budget. Robert C. Modys, AICP Assistant Project Manager Role: Planning Support Office Location Fort Lauderdale, FL Education BA, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University (2014) Years of Experience 6 Years with Tindale Oliver <1 Certifications/Awards AICP #31918 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Certification GIS Certificate, Remote Sensing Professional Affiliations Smart Growth Partnership Broward, Board Member (2019–present) Broward Section, Florida APA, Chair (2018–19) Safe Streets Summit 2020, Mobile Tours Committee Member Florida Chapter APA, Executive Committee Member (2018–19) NACTO Bikeshare Steering Committee (2018–2019) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Robert C. Modys, AICP Assistant Project Manager Planner, Broward County Planning Council Broward County, FL | March 2016–April 2017* Analyzed proposed County land-use plan amendments based on needs of related outside departments and agencies; issued land use interpretations to determine compliance with existing and proposed local and County land use designations; analyzed municipal land-use plan amendment recertifications to ensure compliance with applicable goals, policies, and objectives; reviewed new plats, including plat note changes and platting determinations. Planner I, Planning Technician II, and Intern, Johnson Engineering, Inc. Fort Lauderdale, FL | May 2012–August 2012, May 2013–March 2016* Assisted with updates to Cleveland Avenue CRA Redevelopment Plan; prepared applications for zoning and comprehensive plan amendments for commercial, industrial, mixed-use, public facility, and residential projects throughout South Florida, including preparing required GIS mapping exhibits, performing geospatial analysis, and attending public hearings; assisted with comprehensive plan amendments, including for Babcock Ranch Community, one of first solar-powered master- planned communities in the US; performed data collection, analysis, and summary documents to ensure compliance with comprehensive plan and zoning requirements throughout south Florida; prepared technical documentation to support submission, monitored reports and public education components of FDEP Economic Development Authority (EDA) grants. *Worked performed prior to joining Tindale Oliver 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Laura’s areas of expertise include graphic design, page and publication layout, web development and design, and multimedia software. On a daily basis, she develops and contributes to the visual design of reports, proposals, presentations, public workshops materials, project websites, brochures, signage, etc. Her skills are essential to the public involvement activities required on Tindale Oliver projects through the creation of websites, email blasts, surveys, flyers, infographics, and display boards, making them concise and easy to read. Her creative flair and expertise enhance all promotional collateral, and her ability to develop and conduct concepts from inception to completion are integral to Tindale Oliver’s communications with clients, colleagues, government officials, and the public. Relevant Project Experience FDOT District 2 Support FDOT District 2 | Jacksonville, FL | 2017-Ongoing Lead Graphics/Web Designer Provide graphic and web design support on several District's Community Traffic Safety Program tasks, including: Educational Materials – designed crash data factsheets for each of the 18 counties in the district. The factsheets focus on the different crash categories and data for each county. Designed of the 21st Anniversary Edition of Recipes for the Road and Celebrate Safely which aims to reduce drinking and driving and alcohol- related traffic crashes through the use of non-alcoholic recipes. Safety Campaigns – designed “Seasons of Safety” a campaign of social media and print messages dedicated to promote pedestrian and passenger safety during various holidays throughout the year. Designed “Walts Wise Words” the campaign focused on social media messages in the form of bumper stickers. These safety messages are all original and are created by D2 CTST team member Walt Duffany. Maintenance of Websites – assist in the maintenance of the main CTST website and the D2 CTST SharePoint portal, making sure both platforms are up to date. Activities include: upload of documents, post new campaigns, add event to the calendar, and provide a monthly Google Analytics report of the site activities. FDOT D7 Support FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | Ongoing Lead Graphics/Web Designer Provide graphic and web design support on several ongoing FDOT D7 contracts, including: Special Events – designed and produced all conference materials (programs, email campaigns, display boards, handouts) for Safety Summit and CTST Statewide Coalition Meeting. Public Outreach – developed and produced display boards showing specific renderings representing upcoming improvements during public outreach workshops for SR60/Kennedy Boulevard and Jackson Street Resurfacing Project and US 98 and Citrus Way Intersection Improvements. Laura Molennor Graphic Designer Role: Public Involvement Support Office Location Tampa, FL Education BFA, Graphic Design, International Academy of Design and Technology– Tampa (2007) AS, Graphic Design, International Academy of Design and Technology– Tampa (2005) Years of Experience 13 Years with Tindale Oliver 12 Professional Affiliations AIGA Tampa Bay Technical Skills Adobe Creative Cloud (Print and Web) HTML, CSS, and JavaScript SharePoint 2013 WordPress 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Laura Molennor Graphic Designer FDOT D7 Community Traffic Safety Teams (CTST) – developed new brand and identity design for all D7 Community Traffic Safety Teams, including design of new logo, letterhead, email blast and PowerPoint templates. Designed posters for Lifesaver Conferences since 2009. Educational Materials – designed Safety Neighborhood educational tip card focusing on speeding through neighborhoods and High-Intensity Activated Crosswalk (HAWK) on Fletcher Avenue; developed door hanger version; created and designed sidewalk stencils focused on bicyclist and pedestrian safety. Safety Campaigns – annually design Recipes for the Road booklets, a collection of non-alcoholic drinks from restaurants in Tampa Bay area, a campaign that has run for 10 years; Move Over, It’s the Law – designed campaign educating public on Florida Statutes, shared on social media. Teen RSA Guides – designed and produced student and teacher guides for Teen Roadways Safety Advocates, national program focused on empowering youth and helping them become teen roadway safety advocates. Commuter Services Program FDOT D1 | Polk County, FL | 2015 - 2018 Lead Web Designer/Developer Developed and designed new website launched in late August 2015 in WordPress that allows Commuter Services staff to easily make edits/changes and provided staff training. Las Olas Traffic and Safety Construction Improvements Project (CIP) City of Fort Lauderdale | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 2018 Lead Graphic Designer/Web Designer Worked with City’s Public Information Office in design of promotional materials (door hangers and business cards) to distribute among business and home owners in SE 15th Avenue between Broward Boulevard and Las Olas Boulevard about upcoming construction improvements in area. Developed website using WordPress using responsive design, making it easy to view on any mobile device. Website provides current information to the public and a way to connect/contact with City if concerns arises. VISION 54/56 Study, Phases I & II Pasco County MPO | Pasco County, FL | 2018 Lead Graphic Designer/Web Designer Continuation of MOBILITY 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. Worked with Pasco County MPO in development of unique brand but still keeping essence of LRTP. Designed and developed project website using HTML5, designed templates for reports, documents, boards for public workshops, presentations, stylized maps, email campaigns. Transit Development Plan Ocala/Marion TPO/SunTran | Marion County, FL | 2017 Lead Graphic Designer/Web Designer Worked with Ocala/Marion TPO in design and development of unique brand for the upcoming Transit Development Plan. Brand included design of document templates, email campaigns, online surveys, a project website. Website developed using WordPress using responsive design making it easy to view on any mobile device. Website provides current information to public about upcoming workshops. SR7 Multimodal Improvements Corridor Study Broward County MPO | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 2016 Lead Graphic Designer/Web Designer Worked directly with Broward MPO IT consultants to develop and maintain project website for SR7 Multimodal Improvements Corridor Study. Designed unique brand to use during duration of project, including documents and reports templates, presentations, project business card, email blast campaigns. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Ines joined Tindale Oliver after working as a Planner for the Pasco County Planning and Development Department, where she was responsible for reviewing Comprehensive Plan Amendments and their corresponding Transportation Needs Assessments, reviewing Master Planned Unit Developments, Community Development Districts, Variances, and Euclidean rezoning requests. Previously, she was a Community and Regional Planner for the Harry S Truman Coordinating Council (HSTCC) in Missouri, where she managed the implementation of a Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) for Camp Crowder, Newton, and McDonald counties and the cities of Neosho and Goodman. She has held various planning intern positions, including an internship with Prince George’s County Planning Department in Maryland. She is proficient in Visio, Adobe, SketchUp, AutoCAD, Revit, GIS, TransCAD, and SAS and is fluent in English, French, and Kinyarwanda. Relevant Project Experience ADA Transition Plan Town of Fort Myers | Fort Myers Beach, FL | 2020-Ongoing ADA Compliance Architect Subcontractor to Castellanos and Tramonte Architects. Conducting assessments of facilities, parks, and pedestrian infrastructure including crosswalks and curb ramps. Reviewing Town policies, programs, and procedures and Town website using WCAG 2.0 website standards. Will present findings to Town Council and integrate public comments into final comprehensive ADA Transition Plan. Local Road Safety Plan Collier County MPO | Collier County, FL | 2019-Ongoing Project Manager Developing comprehensive LRSP with input from broad range of stakeholders in strategic planning process through public input meetings, workshops with focus groups, partnerships with federal, State, and local agencies. Outcome will prioritize opportunities to improve highway safety, budget programs and projects, implement highway safety strategies, and reduce loss of life, injuries, and property damage while enhancing performance and capacity of county-wide street and highway network. Boise ADA Accessibility Survey Services City of Boise | Boise, ID | 2020-Ongoing Project Manager Conducting on-site accessibility surveys of public property to identify obstacles limiting accessibility to individuals with disabilities, evaluating potential for intuitive human- centered design to ensure facilities are easily accessible. ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan Montgomery College | Montgomery, MD | 2020-Ongoing ADA Compliance Architect Multiphase project overseeing development and execution of ADA Self-Evaluation; identifying College programs, activities, and services that may be discriminatory to people with disabilities and existing obstacles limiting accessibility. Reviewing College policies, practices, and procedures; conducting facility survey and barrier assessment and public participation/ outreach, preparing Comprehensive ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan. Ines Nizeye, AI/PE Assistant Project Manager Role: Planning Support Office Location Baltimore, MD Education MA, City and Regional Planning, University of Memphis (2015) BA, Architectural Studies, University of Arkansas (2013) Years of Experience 6 Years with Tindale Oliver 2 Certifications AI/PE ICC #8979584 (2018) Professional Affiliation International Code Council Women in Transportation (WTS) Baltimore, MD Young Professionals in Transportation (YPT) Baltimore, MD American Planning Association (APA) Baltimore, MD American Institute of Architects—Urban Design section, Baltimore, MD NPC18 (National Planning Conference), Managing Change in Communities Proposal Reviewer, September 2017 Secretary, American Institute of Architecture Students, University of Arkansas, Fall 2011–2012 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Apex ADA Transition Plan Town of Apex | Apex, NC | 2020-Ongoing ADA Compliance Architect Identifying physical barriers that limit accessibility of facilities (including street crossings, greenways, sidewalks, etc.), programs, activities, or services to individuals with disabilities for all departments. Developing priority list of facilities needing compliance remediation, establishing detailed outline of methods for planning reasonably achievable barrier removal. Countywide ADA Transition Plan Manatee County | Manatee County, FL | 2019 ADA Compliance Architect Due to the number of facilities needed to be assessed and County’s the limited budget, a multi-year assessment schedule has been developed in order to assess a portion of the County’s facilities each year. Currently, the County’s three largest and most utilized buildings have been assessed for compliance with the ADA and a Transition Plan is being developed. Doral Parks ADA Transition Plan City of Doral | Doral, FL | 2019 ADA Compliance Architect In response to a judgment against the City of Doral for not having accessible BBQ grills, a self-evaluation was conducted of the City’s nine parks. All barriers to accessibility were recorded and prioritized and recommendations were developed for barrier removal. Created citywide parks ADA Transition Plan to bring the City into compliance. ADA Bus Stop Transition Plan Space Coast TPO | Brevard County, FL | 2017-2019 ADA Compliance Architect Assessed County’s 1,000+ bus stops along with connecting sidewalks for ADA compliance as part of ADA Transition Plan. Sampled number of riders boarding and alighting at every stop in system via week-long ridecheck. Made multiple presentations to County officials presenting study’s outcome with help of custom infographics. Developed web-based project tracking system to assist TPO in keeping track of accessibility improvements. Citywide ADA Transition Plan City of Portland | Portland, ME | 2018 ADA Compliance Architect Conducted ADA assessment and developed ADA Transition Plan for all of City buildings, parks, and paved trails. Challenges included developing realistic solutions for old and hilly city. Developing plan to mitigate these barriers to accessibility, held multiple meetings and public workshops to inform and get feedback from City officials and citizens. Countywide ADA Transition Plan Gaston County Public Works | Gaston County, NC | 2016-2018 ADA Compliance Architect Assessed 100+ County-owned facilities, including courthouse, jail, government center, libraries, County parks, paved trails. ADA assessments entailed reviewing buildings totaling 1.25 million sf, 800 acres of parks, numerous parking lots, interior and exterior accessible routes. Ines Nizeye, AI/PE Assistant Project Manager 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Jill is a Senior Associate in Tindale Oliver’s Fort Lauderdale office on the Multimodal Transportation Planning Team. She has consulting experience through her work for small, medium and large planning/engineering firms in South Florida and planning positions with Jupiter and Monroe County in Florida. She has more than 26 years of planning experience on a variety of projects, including transit/transportation planning, municipal planning, growth management, environmental planning, and land use studies. Her recent project experience includes TDPs, LRTPs, and regional transportation strategies, and she has managed the environmental process for Florida DOT projects and public outreach for small and large-scale planning projects. Relevant Project Experience Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2017-Ongoing Deputy Project Manager Worked collaboratively with MPO staff to develop Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Established vision for future transportation and growth in Broward region, ensuring that MPO is meeting requirements of US DOT’s FAST Act and Federal and State metropolitan transportation planning requirements. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Pasco County MPO | New Port Richey, FL | 2018-Ongoing Senior Planner This project is the five-year update of the Mobility 2040 LRTP. Tindale Oliver is responsible for coordinating and executing the full development of the 2045 LRTP. Tasks include socio-economic data development, scenario planning, cost and revenue analysis, public engagement, development of the needs plan, and development of the cost affordable plan. Innovative and key aspects of plan development include incorporation of all modes of travel, consideration of new ACES technology elements (autonomous, connected, electric, shared vehicles), innovative public engagement, and incorporation of Vision 54/56 recommendations. Transit Development Plan Major Update Broward County Transit (BCT) | Broward County, FL | 2019 Public Outreach Task Lead Prepared major update of 10-year TDP to meet FDOT TDP requirements. Developed 10- year vision for transit supported by realistic financial plan. Conducted extensive public participation, performance assessment of existing transit services, identification and evaluation of transit alternatives, comprehensive service and financial plan for next decade. Developed phased implementation plan and related financial plan to detail 10- year vision, convened TDP Advisory Review Committee, assessed existing plans and county baseline conditions to establish actionable situation appraisal, worked with staff to develop detailed capital and information technologies plan for TDP timeframe. Jill Jernigan Quigley, AICP Senior Associate Role: Task Lead—Public Involvement Office Location Fort Lauderdale, FL Education MS, Urban & Regional Planning, Florida State University (1995) BS, Biology, Tulane University (1992) Years of Experience 26 Years with Tindale Oliver 2 Certifications AICP #014802 (1999) Professional Affiliations American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) American Planning Association (APA) WTS South Florida 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Tampa Arterial Bus Rapid Transit Study Hillsborough Transit Authority (HART) | Tampa, FL | 2019-Ongoing Project Manager Identifying most appropriate corridor to connect Downtown Tampa to USF Tampa Campus with premium BRT service using combination of Florida, Nebraska, and/or Fowler avenues and help HART improve local, street-level bus service and supporting infrastructure along these three major avenues and on intersecting corridors between the two major activity centers. Uptown Urban Village Land Use Amendment and Form Based Code Master City of Fort Lauderdale Traffic and Transportation | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 2018 Senior Planner Established a planning framework by amending land uses to a mixed-use designation that supports multimodal development. Authored a form based code to guide development toward creating a thriving mixed-use district. Plan objectives included advancing ULI recommendations, community engagement, enhancing assets, improvements to bicycle/pedestrian and parks/open space infrastructure, evaluating Uptown brand to ensure strong sense of place, recommending codes to support the vision, predicting growth, and developing next steps to support the vision. Arterial Connectivity Study along the I-595 Corridor FDOT District 4 | Broward County, FL | 2019-Ongoing Senior Planner This study evaluates the I-595/SR-84 areas of influence of intersecting north-south arterial roadways to identify short- and long-term congestion relief improvements that can be packaged into work programs of transportation agencies for funding and implementation. Transit Development Plan Major Update Miami-Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works | Miami, FL | 2018-Ongoing Project Manager Prepared Public Involvement Plan, provided public outreach support, presented to Advisory Review Committee, conducted peer analysis, contributed to situation appraisal, assisted with development of goals and objectives, developed 10-year financial plan. Intermodal Center Studies for University Area and Wesley Chapel FDOT District 7 | Tampa, FL | 2017-Ongoing Senior Planner Determining type of facility needed and identifying potential locations for Center Evaluating site(s) in terms of parking and transit supply and demand, constructability, transportation infrastructure requirements, and order-of-magnitude costs. Developing and executing project management plan and stakeholder communication plan, coordinating with ongoing projects, performing Facility Needs Assessment, defining conceptual layout and characteristics, developing evaluation process and identifying candidate sites, performing site evaluation process, assessing traffic impact of selected sites, developing conceptual plan for selected sites, developing costs for conceptual plan, conducting funding analysis, preparing study report and documentation. Let’s Talk Transportation Public Outreach, Speak up Broward Phase 2 Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2015–2018 Project Manager Project designed to build on accomplishments of Phase 1 and continue efforts to increase public’s awareness of MPO, its programs, and how transportation funded. As part of outreach, developed infographics to simply convey complex issues, conducted multimedia Town Hall events, coordinated Speakers Bureau, and conducted other engagement activities. Also assisted in development of Public Private Partnership (P3) strategies by working with MPO and its stakeholders to provide fact sheets and guiding principles. Additional tasks included website redesign/rebranding, informational materials & pamphlets, and MPO messaging & branding guide. *Worked performed prior to joining Tindale Oliver Jill Jernigan Quigley, AICP Senior Associate 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Andrea has more than 25 years of experience in marketing for the AEC (Architecture- Engineering-Construction) industry, particularly for construction management, design- build, geotechnical engineering, and transportation planning and engineering. Public involvement experience includes social media and internet marketing campaigns for numerous city, county, and state agencies. Campaign elements include online surveys and polls, e-mail newsletters and announcements, text message campaigns, and social media account creation and maintenance. Marketing and communications experience includes marketing research and assessment, social media campaigns, proposal and presentation coordination, tradeshow and event planning, marketing database creation/maintenance, project lead generation, marketing plan development and strategy, and media relations. Andrea currently serves on the Digital Committee for the Tampa Bay Chapter of the Public Relations Society of America and was the 2013 recipient of the PRSA Tampa Bay President’s Award. Previously, she was co-director of the Society for Marketing Professional Services’ Membership Committee. Relevant Project Experience FDOT District 2 Support FDOT District 2 | Jacksonville, FL | 2017-Ongoing Marketing & Communications Coordinator Provide marketing and communications support on multiple ongoing FDOT District 2 tasks, including: Social media content creation, scheduling and maintenance: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Pinterest, LinkedIn and YouTube Email blasts for special projects, as well as regular monthly email blasts to team members Communications for special project campaigns FDOT D7 Support FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | Ongoing Marketing & Communications Coordinator Provide marketing and communications support on multiple ongoing FDOT District 7 tasks including: Community Traffic Safety Teams (CTST) communications – meeting email blasts, special announcement email blasts, website administration, monthly agendas and meeting minutes, email list creation and maintenance Local Agency Traffic Safety Academy Series– online event registration, email blast series D7 Local Agency Safety Summits – online event registration, email blasts Virtual Public Hearings – Placement of legal ads, applying for CM credits, coordination of mailing of property owner letters 2014 and 2015 Cyclovia Tampa Bay – creation/maintenance of social media accounts, email blasts, email lists, website administration Assessment location online surveys Bike/Walk Tampa Bay Coalition – miscellaneous communications Andrea Sauvageot Community Outreach Specialist—Senior Role: Public Involvement Support Office Location Tampa, FL Education MA, Communication, Southern New Hampshire University (2017) BS, Journalism, University of Florida (1994) Social Marketing for Transportation, University of South Florida (CUTR) Desktop Publishing Certificate, University of South Florida Webmaster Certificate— Design, St. Petersburg College Years of Experience 25 Years with Tindale Oliver 8 Professional Affiliations Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) — Tampa Bay Chapter, Website/Job Board Committee Chair 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Andrea Sauvageot Community Outreach Specialist—Senior Assessment location online surveys Bike/Walk Tampa Bay Coalition – miscellaneous communications Other FDOT District Support: Email Blasts/Surveys/Social Media FDOT | Florida | Ongoing Marketing & Communications Coordinator Provide marketing and communications support on multiple ongoing FDOT contracts, including: D1 Commuter Services – email blast series for AAA Tow to Go, eZTrack, Try Transit series, information updates, email lists D1 Procurement Trainings – email blasts and online event registration, coordination of event space/day of event logistics, coordination of signage and materials D5 2nd Annual Community Planning Workshops – email blast series D5 US 441 Corridor Study – community survey D5 US 441 Corridor Study – public meeting email blast Central Office Accessing Transit: Bus Facility Design Handbook Training Course and Updates – email blasts and online event registration, coordination of event space/day of event logistics, coordination of signage and materials, manage CM application process Central Office TDP Preparation and Review Trainings – email blasts and online event registration, coordination of event space/day of event logistics, coordination of signage and materials, manage CM application process City/County/Transit Agency Email Blast/Survey/Social Media Experience Provided marketing and communications coordination and support for agency contracts, including: Sarasota County Bike Ped Plan survey Smyrna Public Input survey Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO 2045 LRTP survey Citrus TDP survey Envision 2030 Transit Needs survey St. Lucie County Bus Blueprint Proposed Bus Service Improvements survey Heights Mobility Study—Phase I survey Key West Public Input survey Charlotte Rides Public Input survey SunTran 2018–2027 TDP email blast series, online surveys, robodial campaign, Facebook and Twitter campaigns, Facebook ad campaign Access Pasco, PCPT 10-Year Transition Plan Facebook page and Twitter account creation/maintenance Miami-Dade Transit Development Plan (MDT10Ahead) survey (English, Spanish & Creole) Broward MPO SR 7 email blast series, text message campaign, and General User & Field surveys Hollywood Pines Corridor Project Visioning Workshops survey, project e-newsletter and email blast series Escambia County Area Transit 10-Year Transit Needs survey and Facebook maintenance SFRTA survey and email blast series Ocala/Marion County TPO 2040 LRTP email blast series and visioning survey Collier Area Transit Development Plan visioning survey (English and Spanish) Miami-Dade Transit Development Plan (MDT10Ahead) survey (English, Spanish & Creole) Hernando/Citrus MPO Consensus Workshops survey, email blast, robocall campaign City of Lakewood (WA) Community Vision Plan survey (English, Spanish & Korean) Broward MPO, Hollywood Pines Corridor Project visioning workshops survey, project e-newsletter, email blast series Broward MPO SR 7 SMS marketing campaign, email list maintenance Oahu (HI) MPO Planning Process Review survey Pasco County MPO Mobility 2040 Transportation Plan survey, feedback survey, email blasts Sarasota Citywide Mobility Plan email blast series Collier County Mobility Master Plan email blast series SFRTA survey, email blast series 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Elisabeth has been involved in or managed numerous transit studies, including Transit Development Plans (TDPs), Title VI evaluations and equity assessments, service implementation plans, passenger intercept surveys, and agency support related to procurement, federal property, and grant applications. She has also worked with a number of transit agencies on paratransit and coordinated planning efforts, including developing locally coordinated human services transportation plans, paratransit plans, and transportation disadvantaged service plans. Relevant Project Experience Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2017-Ongoing Senior Planner Worked collaboratively with MPO staff to develop Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Established vision for future transportation and growth in Broward region, ensuring that MPO is meeting requirements of US DOT’s FAST Act and Federal and State metropolitan transportation planning requirements. Transit Development Plan Major Update Broward County Transit (BCT) | Broward County, FL | 2013, 2019 Deputy Project Manager Prepared major update of 10-year TDP to meet FDOT TDP requirements. Developed 10- year vision for transit supported by realistic financial plan. Conducted extensive public participation, performance assessment of existing transit services, identification and evaluation of transit alternatives, comprehensive service and financial plan for next decade. Developed phased implementation plan and related financial plan to detail 10- year vision, convened TDP Advisory Review Committee, assessed existing plans and county baseline conditions to establish actionable situation appraisal, worked with staff to develop detailed capital and information technologies plan for TDP timeframe. Title VI/LEP, DBE Goal and EJ Assessment Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2017-Ongoing Project Manager This is a two part project. The first part will be to update the Broward MPO’s Title VI/ Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plan and calculate its updated Federal Transit Administration (FTA) overall DBE goal per federal requirements. The second part will be to create and implement a process for the MPO to conduct standardized Title VI and Environmental Justice (EJ) assessments of its different plans and programs. SR 7 Multimodal Improvements Corridor Study Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2016 Senior Planner Identified multimodal improvements to manage congestion and mitigate safety issues for transit users including; motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, and passengers along the SR 7 corridor. Elisabeth Schuck, AICP, LEED GA Senior Project Manager Role: Planning Support Office Location Seattle, WA Education MA, Geography, University of South Florida (2008) BS, Environmental Science Stetson University (2003) Years of Experience 18 Years with Tindale Oliver 17 Certifications AICP #021945 (2007) LEED GA #10609088 (2010) Professional Affiliations American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) American Planning Association (APA) Florida APA Suncoast Section, Executive Committee (2010-2012) Washington APA Puget Sound Section, Executive Committee (2013-current) Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.tindaleoliver.com Elisabeth Schuck, AICP, LEED GA Senior Project Manager SCAT Plus Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Sarasota County (SCAT) | Sarasota County, FL | 2019 Project Manager Identified progress made since previous TDSP, developed plan to identify long-term goals and objectives of local TD service, developed service plan, conducted quality assurance, conducted outreach to gather input on County’s transportation needs. Transit Fare Study Collier County MPO |Collier County, FL | 2018 Project Manager Conducted detailed analysis of CAT fixed-route, ADA, and Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) fare structures; prepared and evaluated detailed fare change scenarios and corresponding policies to balance potential ridership impacts with additional fare revenue necessary to maintain existing services due to increasing operating costs; incorporated transit customer input into selecting final scenario, which was adopted by Board of County Commissioners. Transit Development Plan Heartland Regional TPO | Highlands County, FL | 2017 Project Manager Completed initial feasibility and 2017 Major TDP update for recently-designated urbanized area, which has provided TD paratransit services for years; TDP evaluated need and potential for implementing new urban public transit service and system. With extensive public input, plan identified local needs and transit preferences for fixed-route, flex, and on-demand service. Strategic vision within TDP used to guide planning, development, and implementation of potential future public transportation service within urbanized area. Plan received 2018 Rural Achievement Regional Leadership and Excellence Award from National Association of Regional Councils and Florida American Planning Association 2018 Project Award. Transit Development Plan Major Update Hernando/Citrus MPO | Hernando County, FL | 2009, 2014 Senior Planner Prepared TDP: assessed overall transit-related needs in area, developed phased implementation plan of recommended improvements. Included public involvement plan, review of demographic and travel behavior characteristics in area, evaluation of existing services, situation appraisal, transit demand and mobility needs, development of proposed transit enhancements, annual farebox recovery ratio report, a 10-year financial plan. Citywide Mobility Plan City of Sarasota | Sarasota, FL | 2015 Senior Planner Assisted with establishment of mobility districts based on City’s existing land use density/diversity and vision and multimodal options by which to vary the City’s development review process. Identify feasible bicycle/pedestrian projects to enhance multimodal network and develop city multimodal impact fee as an alternative to countywide roadway-only transportation impact fee. Concurrency Review Collier County | Collier County, FL | 2013-2014 Project Manager Completed comprehensive review of County’s concurrency program and land development code to identify inconsistencies with State law and identify opportunities to better support County’s vision for development and growth by geographic subarea. Provided recommendations on how County could move forward in modifying its development review process and concurrency program to achieve consistency with State law and better address development goals and infrastructure needs in different areas of county. Collier County Master Mobility Plan Collier County | Collier County, FL | 2012 Project Manager Preparation of coordinated build-out vision plan for county’s mobility, land use, and infrastructure needs to reduce VMT and GHG emissions while protecting habitat, environmentally-sensitive land, and agriculture. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Oliver Remy Rodrigues, P.E., PTOE Senior Vice President / Chief Engineer Oliver has 28 years of experience in the area of transportation planning and traffic engineering. He has provided services for a variety of projects for clients throughout Florida. Oliver has conducted various transit studies and corridor feasibility studies. He provides traffic engineering services and performs qualitative assessment and recommends mitigation measures. He also prepares design plans for signing and pavement markings, decorative street lighting, and signalization. Relevant Project Experience Miami Dade Traffic Flow Modification/ Street Closure Procedure Update: Project Manager – FTE is leading the research effort of the latest national guidelines and practices to develop recommendations and to update the County’s procedure in regards to Traffic Flow Modifications, Traffic Calming Devices, Street Closures procedures, Roadways Classifications, Pedestrian Crossings, School Review procedure, and Parking restrictions in the Right-of-Way. FTE is also coordinating the effort with various County departments and local municipalities. Reference: Ayman Elbermawy, M.S., P.E., Miami Dade County (305) 375-2030 Charlotte County – Punta Gorda MPO 2045 LRTP Update, Charlotte County, FL: Senior Engineer – As a subconsultant, FTE provided support to conducting an existing plus committed congestion analysis. Reference: Wallly Blain, AICP, Tindale-Oliver PM, 813 224 8862. Gandy Blvd. Adaptation Study, Hillsborough MPO, Tampa, FL: Senior Engineer – As a subconsultant, FTE developed and analyzed alternative conceptual designs and prepared cost estimates for a 0.4 mile segment of Gandy Boulevard from the bridge over Tampa Bay to the proposed elevated connector over the Westshore business district. This segment is a critical link between Hillsborough and Pinellas counties, and the results of the study were used to decrease the vulnerability of this segment which is subject to inundation due to flooding, sea level rise, and storm surge. Reference: Karen Kiselewski, AICP, Cambridge Systematics PM, 954 331 6116. Tampa Bay Region: Vulnerability Assessment of Critical Surface Transportation Infrastructure Study, Hillsborough MPO, Tampa, FL: Senior Engineer - FHWA provided a grant to perform a vulnerability assessment pilot study of Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties. Critical roadway corridors and adaptation strategies were evaluated, and projects were identified for the MPO’s long range transportation plan. As a subconsultant, FTE assisted in providing strategies and solutions and provided cost estimates for potential projects. Reference: Karen Kiselewski, AICP, Cambridge Systematics PM, 954 331 6116. Pompano Education Corridor Transit Study, Broward County MPO RFP NO. 14-02, Broward County, FL: Project Manager - The purpose of the study was to determine the feasibility of a transit shuttle or circulator to improve access to the educational facilities among the four municipalities, Pompano Beach, Margate, Coconut Creek and Coral Springs. Oliver evaluated existing transportation and transit infrastructure and identified deficiencies on roadway, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities. He also developed evaluation criterion and performance measures to evaluate route and service alternatives for a community bus system. Participated in stakeholder meetings with the community. Reference: Paul Calvaresi, Broward MPO, (954) 876-0033. Education B.S., Civil Engineering, University, South Florida, 1991 Registrations Professional Engineer, FL No. 50646 Professional Traffic Operations Engineer No. 1765 Institute of Transportation Engineers Florida Engineering Society Years of Experience 28 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Oliver Remy Rodrigues, P.E., PTOE Page 2 Districtwide Modal Development Consultant, FDOT District 4: Project Manager/QC Reviewer - Currently a sub consultant for FDOT District 4. FTE collected and analyzing pedestrian and bicycle movements using portable video collection units at high activity locations throughout the district. The data is collected annually for a comparison of trends. FTE also observed rail car movements at various CSX and FEC crossings in Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, and the Treasure Coast counties. Using video collection units, FTE collected characteristics at crossings including time of day, direction of travel, duration of gate closure, and number of engines and passenger/freight cars. Data was collected simultaneously over several locations so as to gather passenger/freight movement across the region in Districts 4 and 6. Reference: A. Jeffrey Weidner, FDOT District 4, 954-777-4670. South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA) Tri-Rail Transit Development Plan - On Board Ridership Survey, Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, FL: Project Manager/Data Collection – As a sub-consultant, FTE conducted an on-board travel survey of SFRTA Tri-Rail riders for the purpose of capturing travel patterns, socio-economic characteristics, and customer opinions and preferences. The primary goal of this survey effort was to gather information related to current ridership patterns and identify areas for improvements to support SFRTA’s FY 2014-2023 Transit Development Plan (TDP), Major Update. Reference: Natalie Yesbeck, SFRTA, 954-788-7957. Analysis of Traffic Conflicts at Driveways & Right-Turn Lanes Pilot Study - Strategic Intermodal Systems (SIS) Planning Consultant, C-8Z61, FDOT Central Office, FL: QC Reviewer - FTE provided subconsultant services as part of a pilot study to collect and analyze data at various driveways and conduct a manual conflicts analysis. FTE conducted the video data collection of vehicular driveway movements for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Reference: Robert A. Hamm, P.E., CDM Smith, 850-386-9529. Miami Dade Transit, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Implementation Plan along Transit Corridors, Miami-Dade County, FL: Project Manager/QC Reviewer As a sub-consultant for Miami Dade County MPO, Oliver assisted in developing level of service volumes for lane reduction for the evaluation of a plan to implement Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) along the following transit corridors: North Corridor (NW 27th Avenue), East-West Corridor (SR-836 and Flagler Street), Kendall Corridor and Douglas Road Corridor. He also collected existing right-of-way for the corridors. Reference: Larry Foutz, HNTB, 305-704- 1218. Kendall Drive Transit Signal Priority Pilot Study, Miami Dade MPO General Planning Consultant, Miami-Dade, FL: Project Manager/QC Reviewer - The MPO initiated this pilot study to assess the impacts of bus priority at selected intersections within the corridor. In order to best analyze the impacts of TSP along the corridor, including any impacts on the signal coordination system, the Kendall Drive segment from SW 137th Avenue to SW 127th Avenue was selected as the study area for this project. The purpose of this study was to assess the impacts of bus priority. Reduction in bus control delay and bus travel time, minimal delay to non-transit vehicles were the Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) for this study. FTE is a sub consultant providing traffic engineering and data collection services, and report preparation. Reference: Jitender Ramchandani, Miami-Dade MPO, 305-375-1735. Douglas Road Transit Corridor Study, Miami-Dade MPO General Planning Consultant, Miami-Dade, FL: Project Manager/QC Reviewer - As a sub-consultant, FTE evaluated travel characteristics for a potential new route along the Douglas Road Corridor from the Miami Intermodal Center (MIC) to Coral Gables/Coconut Grove area. Evaluated travel time and speed, identified operational deficiencies, prepared technical memorandum. Reference: Carlos Cejas, Gannett Fleming, 786-845-9540 Ext. 5812. Beach Corridor Transit Connection Study, Miami Dade County MPO GPC: Project Manager/QC Reviewer - Assisting in the update of a 2003 Environmental Impact Statement by researching census data and construction/develop ment in downtown Miami and Miami Beach. Reference: Myrna Valdez; Gannett Fleming, 786-845-9540. SR 90 / US 41 / Tamiami Trail / SW 8th Street from Krome Avenue to SW 122nd Avenue, FDOT District 6, Miami-Dade County, FL: Project Manager/Engineer of Record – FTE is evaluated existing conditions and developed improvement based on future travel demand along the corridor. Developed typical section concepts with transit lanes for the corridor in addition to bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Coordinate with adjacent studies and present updates to the Project Advisory Team. Reference: Neil Lyn; FDOT District 6, 305-470-5373. City of Miami Beach, Beach Walk Expansion – Pedestrian and Bicycle Study, Miami Beach, FL: Project Manager/QC Reviewer - Oliver provided support for the evaluation of existing conditions for pedestrian and bicycle activity along the beach walk. Reference: Xavier Falconi, City of Miami Beach, 305-673-7000 Ext. 6129. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Charles M. Sloan Senior Engineering Technician Charles Sloan has over 31 years of experience in collecting and entering TCI, RCI and HPMS data. He is trained in RCI-2 and attended the “Train the Trainer” course. He is certified in BT-04- 0005, BT-04-0039, BT-04-0040, BT-04-0041, BT-04-0042, BT-04- 0043, and has received training in RITA. He has collected and/or managed RCI/HPMS data in Districts 1, 4, 6 and 7. He has collected and/or managed TCI data in Districts 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 7. He is also proficient with PTMS inspection and installation. He manages field crews and has been responsible for obtaining and executing various traffic count and RCI data collection contracts. Relevant Project Experience District Wide Maintenance Roadway Characteristic Inventory (RCI) Data Collection, District 1 RFPDOT-16-17-1098DR: FTE provided Maintenance RCI data collection in the twelve counties in District 1. Reference: Paul J. Barnes, D-1, 863-519-2680. District Wide Sign and Guardrail Inspection, District 1 BE718: FTE is currently providing sign inspection, guardrail inspection, and sign retro reflectivity evaluations. Reference: Oscar Aguirre, D-1, 863-519-2355. Districtwide Transportation Statistics-Data Collection & Analysis, FDOT District 1, Current Contract C-9M12: The scope of this project is to support the Planning Department by providing technical personnel to perform services specifically related to data collection and reporting activities on roadways that are located on and off of the State Highway System in District 1. Services provided include RCI, HPMS Inventory, Data Entry, and SLD production. In addition to the planning RCI, FTE has performed inventory of 107 acres of landscape area, 28,744 trees, and 225 irrigation systems in Charlotte, Collier, Highlands, Polk, Sarasota, Lee, and Manatee counties along roadways totaling 1,416 center lane miles. Reference: Kyle Purvis, D-1, 863-519-2395 TIGER Grant Bicycle Pedestrian Study, Lee County MPO Services: FTE conducted pedestrian and bicycle traffic counts as well as travel surveys at selected locations throughout Lee County. This data collection effort is part of the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery Grant Project (TIGER). This project will complete three sections of the regional trail network: the Tour de Parks Loop, the University Loop, and the Bi-County Connector, and will create an integrated system of walking, bicycling, and transit facilities that connect major commercial, residential, and recreational facilities. The purpose of this study was to determine the following characteristics of users: modes of travel, trip purpose, trip length, and user profile. Managed Lanes Feasibility Study on I-295 from Buckman Bridge to I-95 South Interchange, FDOT District 2: FTE provided the following data collection services at I-295 interchanges: 7-day volume ramp counts at 28 locations; mainline 7-day bi-directional volume counts at six locations; deploy blue tooth units for 7 days at 40 locations; 12 arterial counts; turning movement counts collected at four intersections. Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority (OOCEA) Traffic & Earnings Consultant: FTE provided data collection services as a subconsultant to CDM Smith including 72-hour volume, directional counts at 35 locations in the Central Florida Region. FTE is utilizing the BluFAX Bluetooth technology to conduct a ramp-to-ramp origin-destination survey on the Beachline Airport Mainline Toll Plaza on SR 528 (Beachline Expressway). US-1/South Dixie Highway (Busway) Express Lanes PD&E Study, Miami Dade Expressway Authority (MDX): FTE’s responsibilities include data collection (72-hour arterial Professional Certifications • RCI Basics • RCI Advanced Concepts • RCI Intro to Data Management • RCI Intermediate Office • RCI Intermediate Field Data Collection • Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) • Planning Roadway Data Collection • Sign Installation & Inspection • Guardrail Installation & Inspection Years of Experience 31 Years 2011-Present, FTE 2005-2011, Marlin Engineering 2003-2005, FR Aleman 1990-2003, FTE 1988-1990, FDOT Availability 45% 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Charles M. Sloan Page 2 counts at 362 locations, turning movement counts at 94 intersections, and 72-hour miscellaneous counts at 57 locations), Auto Occupancy Study (35,000 vehicles) and Origin Destination Study (9,500 surveys). In addition, the tasks FTE is responsible for include Safety Analysis, Access Management, development of design traffic, development of travel demand model, evaluation of “No-Build” and three Managed Lanes alternatives for 3 analysis years using VISSIM Software, and Signal Timing Optimization and Operational analysis of the intersections using SYNCHRO Software. South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA) Tri-Rail Transit Development Plan-On Board Ridership Survey, Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, FL: FTE conducted an on-board travel survey of SFRTA Tri-Rail riders for the purpose of capturing travel patterns, socio-economic characteristics, and customer opinions and preferences. The primary goal of this survey effort is to gather information related to current ridership patterns and identify areas for improvements to support SFRTA’s FY 2014-2023 Transit Development Plan (TDP), Major Update. Kendall Drive Transit Signal Priority Pilot Study, Miami Dade MPO General Planning Consultant, Miami-Dade, FL: The MPO initiated this pilot study to assess the impacts of Bus priority at selected intersections within the corridor. In order to best analyze the impacts of TSP along the corridor, including any impacts on the signal coordination system, the Kendall Drive segment of SW 137th Avenue to SW 127th Avenue was selected as the study area for this project. Reduction in bus control delay and bus travel time, minimal delay to non-transit vehicles were the Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) for this study. FTE was a subconsultant providing traffic engineering and data collection services, and report preparation. Districtwide Statistics Traffic Data & Analysis, FDOT District 4 Contract C-8Z10: Data Collection Manager - The Scope included collecting and analyzing traffic and highway data, Traffic/Roadway Characteristics Inventory (TCI/RCI) data collection, data reporting, mapping applications, and data analysis; collect and analyze customer trip characteristics, travel behavior, demographic characteristics, and operational and performance measures from the public transit systems in the district to support travel demand modeling, long-range and areawide planning, route planning and scheduling, service design, marketing, and customer communications. Districtwide Highway and Roadway Data Collection, FDOT District 4, Broward County, FL: Field Supervisor - Charles was responsible for RCI, SLD’s, HPMS development, TTMS and PTMS implementation. Districtwide Federal Functional Classification, FDOT District 1 Contract C-9720: Statistics Specialist - Charles is assisting with updating the RCI for the roadways that have a change in functional classification. Transportation Statistics Support No. 3, FDOT District 6 Contract C-8T89, Miami-Dade County: Data Collection Manager - Charles managed tasks involving RCI, SLD’s, HPMS development, traffic count stations program, TTMS and PTMS implementation. Districtwide Statistics Highway Data, FDOT District 7, Current Contract C-9F97: Deputy Project Manager - Charles coordinates the day to day activities of the contract with the Department’s staff. This support includes data collection, data entry, geographic information system (GIS) mapping, graphics preparation, SLD preparation utilizing MicroStation and FDOT's AutoDiagrammer software, and other tasks to support Roadway Characteristics Inventory (RCI), Straight Line Diagrams (SLD's), Basemap, and Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) functions within District 7. Districtwide Digital Data Extraction, FDOT District 3, C-9F92: FTE is collecting, processing, and reporting general descriptive data for a series of Department databases and computer systems, including but not limited to: on-system and off- system roadways for RCI, and HPMS. Districtwide Statistics Program, FDOT District 7, Contract C-7180: Data Collection Manager - Involved routine and special traffic counts; TMC/ped/bicycle counts; vehicle classification counts, traffic count maps; inspection of loop sites, RCI, and functional classification. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) LAURA LOCKWOOD-HERRSCHER, AICP PREVIOUS WORK EXPERIENCE Planning and Environmental Director (HNTB) | 2018 - 2019 | Laura was the Director of the Planning and Environmental Department which served clients in the West Florida area including FDOT Districts 1, 3, and 7, Hillsborough County, Pasco County, Pinellas Transit Authority, and Tampa-Hillsborough Expressway Authority. She also managed projects for FDOT Central Office under the Office of Policy Planning contract. During her time in this role, Laura provided valuable leadership to the team and grew the department by adding environmental staff, public involvement, and planning specialists. Productivity of the department was enhanced with the creation of a Communications Section that included graphic design and technical writing talents. Project and tasks that Laura oversaw as Director of this group ranged from environmental permit reviews, feasibility studies, management of projects for FDOT in a staff augmentation role, planning consistency review, planning and corridor studies, demand modeling efforts and general planning support for GEC contracts for clients. Intermodal Systems Development (ISD) Administrator | FDOT District One | 2016 - 2018; Urban Manager Districtwide | FDOT District One | 2013 - 2016 | Laura was the Department Head leading four functional sections; Project Development and Environmental (PD&E), Modal Development, Systems Planning, and the Liaison Group/Planning Studio (rural planning and MPO Programs) for a 12-county District. She provided oversight and management of PD&E activities including National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance, state of Florida delegation memorandum of understanding (MOU) and audit, six MPOs, rail, seaport, aviation, transit and freight development, and urban and rural planning needs. She also led coordination with local governments, MPOs, development of the regional transportation demand model, priority project programming, work program development, public hearings, and geographic information system (GIS) for the District. She was a principal actor in establishing and forming the Heartland Regional Transportation Planning Organization (TPO), consisting of 6 counties. In addition, steered her team through the first federal audit of the Department as required in the MOU for delegation assignment of NEPA. She directed District programming of project priorities for MPOs and local governments, including establishing evaluation criteria for state and regional project programs like SUN Trails and Transportation Improvement Program (TRIP). Laura built relationships with elected officials, MPO Directors and staff, and local government leaders to create fruitful partnerships resulting in successful implementation of projects that met the needs of the communities. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Continuing Services — Planning | Highlands County, FL | Contract Manager | This contract supports Highlands County by providing planning services including multimodal transportation planning, data collection, transportation surveys, and land use/urban planning. Laura is responsible for the management and coordination of task work orders assigned. Education M.A., Public Administration, Troy University, 2010 B.A., Public Administration, St. Leo University, 2003 Professional Certifications/ Affiliations American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Certified Public Manager (CPM) Florida Certified Contract Manager (FCCM) Work Experience Patel, Greene & Associates 2019 - Present HNTB 2018 - 2019 FDOT District One 2013 - 2018 Polk TPO 2003 - 2013 Polk County’s Sheriff’s Office 1997 - 2003 Software ArcGIS Contact 215 E Main Street Bartow, FL 33830 863.533.7317 ext. 204 laura.herrscher@patelgreene.com *Experience prior to joining PGA Laura is a Chief Planner with Patel, Greene and Associates (PGA). She more than 23 years of experience in the public sector and transportation industry. Her background includes leading and managing several aspects of the planning process including policy planning, Long-Range Transportation Plans (LRTP), transit planning, integrated transportation and land use studies, modal development, systems and corridor planning, and the complete streets process. In addition to traditional methods, Laura has organized numerous public engagement efforts for planning studies including conducting charettes and open design studios. Laura’s previous positions in leadership with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the Polk Transportation Planning Organization (Polk TPO) have allowed her to form lasting relationships with key stakeholders across the state. patelgreene.comTampa | Bartow | Winter Park Certified DBE & MBE Chief Planner 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) LAURA LOCKWOOD-HERRSCHER, AICP Chief Planner Continuing Services — PD&E | Highlands County, FL | Contract Manager | This contract supports Highlands County by providing PD&E services including vehicle and pedestrian studies, traffic impact studies, cost analysis of proposed transportation improvements, safety studies intersection design design studies, and traffic performance studies. Laura is responsible for the management and coordination of task work orders assigned. Pasco County General Planning Contract | Pasco County, FL | Contract Manager | This general planning contract serves as an extension of Pasco County by providing general planning services including economic analysis, public engagement, urban design, multimodal transportation planning, land use planning, and planning grants. Laura is responsible for the management and coordination of task work orders assigned. Safe Streets Pinellas | Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization | Project Manager, Planning Director Laura is leading public engagement efforts on this project which include innovative outreach strategies like live demonstration projects and interactive stake- holder workshops. High engagement with local media and social media outlets are part of the outreach plan. This effort is currently ongoing and will use data driven decision making to identify safety improvements and increase awareness of all road users regarding road safety. City of San Antonio, FL Comprehensive Plan Update | City of San Antonio | Project Manager, Chief Planner | Laura assisted the City of San Antonio to bring their Comprehensive Plan into compliance with state statutes. She handled all corrrespondence with Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and updated the plan’s policies and Future Land Use map so that all state laws and requirements were met and complied with. Laura has also assisted the City with small scale amendments, future land use changes for applicants wishing to develop property within the City, and parcel annexations. *South Florida Avenue Corridor Master Plan | Polk County, FL | City of Lakeland | Project Manager, Urban Manager This integrated transportation and land use study Master Plan was the first of its kind initiated and funded by FDOT. The project took a holistic approach to creating a master plan for a prime corridor within the City of Lakeland and included a week-long design charrette with stakeholders to develop a vision for the community. A complete market analysis was accomplished for the study area, and informed decision makers about the type of development and re-development to consider for the corridor. The Dixieland CRA was a primary partner for this study and the market analysis is serving as a key factor for the CRA plan and focus. The project received awards for planning excellence at both the local (Heart of Florida Chapter) and state levels (Florida Chapter) of the American Planning Association. *Big Bend Rd. and 19th Ave. Corridors | Hillsborough County, FL | Project Manager, Planning Director | Laura was the Project Manager of these two separate Preliminary Land-use Assessment and Transportation (PLAT) Studies to evaluate transportation needs, development patterns, potential for development/redevelopment, and alignment of community vision with policy and infrastructure improvement recommendations. The PLAT process is conducted to inform future needs and improvements in the corridor and will serve as a guiding document for upcoming project development studies. The Big Bend Road PLAT study won a 2019 Future of the Region award from the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council in the Transportation and Mobility category. *Golden Acres Traffic Study | Pasco County, FL | Public Involvement Lead | Laura was the lead for public involvement on this project. She managed the task as a subconsultant and developed the public involvement plan. She coordinated the approach to identify and engage stakeholders, the format for a public meeting, and the method in which to gather input and feedback from the stakeholders’ group. Laura’s experience in communicating with elected officials was an asset to the project team, and she handled briefing County Commissioners about the project and the public involvement plan. *Complete Streets Policy and Handbook | Polk County, FL | Polk County TPO | Senior Transportation Planner | As the Senior Transportation Planner, Laura was significantly involved with developing a Complete Streets Policy and Handbook that the TPO board adopted. She assisted with public meetings and presentations to boards and committees, as well as provided quality control/quality assurance on the final plan documents. Furthermore, the TPO achieved support from its member local governments with a joint resolution declaring all would consider the complete streets process when implementing transportation improvements in their jurisdictions. Tampa | Bartow | Winter Park Certified DBE & MBE patelgreene.com 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PEYTON MCLEOD, PTP EXPERIENCE *US 17 Trail PD&E Study | Volusia County, FL | FDOT District Five | Deputy Project Manager This PD&E Study is being performed to develop and evaluate design-ready alternatives for a critical 14-mile link in the St. Johns River to Sea Loop, a SUN Trail priority regional trail network. For the majority of the project, Peyton served as Deputy Project Manager, taking a lead role in public management activities including schedule development and updates, Department and team coordination, budget tracking and compliance, status reporting, and general oversight. The study team is evaluating several alignment alternatives within the US 17 corridor, considering elements such as trail user operating environment, school access/student mobility, local government support, and utility impacts in identifying the preferred alternative. In addition to project management activities, Peyton led socio-cultural effects evaluations, and alternatives evaluations, and the development of materials for the alternatives public meeting. *SR A1A Complete Streets Safety Implementation Plan | Flagler, Volusia, Brevard Counties, FL | FDOT District Five | Technical Lead | Within FDOT District Five, SR A1A spans the length of Flagler, Volusia, and Brevard Counties and serves as a major route for visitors and residents, providing access to tourist destinations and employment centers. Peyton served as the technical lead for this envisioned six-phase study designed to improve the safety and accommodation of pedestrians and bicyclists through a comprehensive 5E program – engineering, education, encouragement, enforcement, and evaluation. In Phase 1 of the study, Peyton reviewed and consolidated prior relevant studies, reviewed crash history along the corridor, and created a list and map of focus segments to move forward to future study phases. *Districtwide Bicycle and Pedestrian Gap Study | FDOT District Two | Technical Lead | This study identified gaps in FDOT District Two’s bicycle and pedestrian network. Peyton led several project components, beginning with creating a districtwide inventory of bicycle and pedestrian facilities and conducting a bicycle and pedestrian existing conditions/level of service analysis for the District’s roadways (more than 2,000 centerline miles). Peyton conducted a detailed analysis of five years of bicycle and pedestrian crash data to determine spatial, temporal, and environmental safety trends. He also developed a prioritization protocol that incorporates the LOS, demand, and safety findings. The results of the study now serve as a guide to the District as it seeks to improve bicycle and pedestrian accommodation. *Level of Service for Shared Use Paths Located Adjacent to Roadways (Sidepaths) Statewide | FDOT Central Office | Project Planner | This Florida DOT sponsored project resulted in a statistically reliable method calculate how well bicyclists will feel a pathway adjacent to a road meets their needs as bicyclists. The project included field data collection as well as a “Video Ride for Science” event in which volunteers rated various bikeway facilities for how well the facilities would meet their needs. Stepwise regression and probit modeling was performed to develop the final predictive models. Education B.A., Geography, Stetson University, 2001 Certifications Professional Transportation Planner, 720, 2020 Work Experience Patel, Greene & Associates 2019 - Present Landis Evans & Partners, Inc. 2003 - 2019 Software ArcGIS, HCS, Synchro, LOSPLAN Contact 12570 Telecom Drive Temple Terrace, FL 33637 813.978.3100 ext. 337 peyton.mcleod@patelgreene.com *Experience prior to joining PGA Peyton McLeod is a Senior Planner with Patel, Greene and Associates (PGA). He has 17 years of experience and is integrally involved in multimodal transportation planning projects, including numerous trail PD&E and corridor studies for FDOT and regional transportation planning agencies. His wide range of experience includes multimodal level of service analyses, non-motorized trip prediction techniques, energy conservation studies, transportation facilities and conditions mapping, national transportation safety studies, multimodal facility demand analyses, and evaluations of transit systems. Peyton is a central figure in the development of numerous pedestrian, bicycle, and trail plans. patelgreene.comTampa | Bartow | Winter Park Certified DBE & MBE Senior Planner 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PEYTON MCLEOD, PTP Senior Planner *SR 52 PD&E | Pasco County, FL | FDOT District Seven | Project Planner | This study examined alternatives for the multi-laning of SR 52 in Pasco County. Peyton evaluated alternatives for a shared use path along the highway, including facility width, separation, and side of road. *Non-motorized Travel Demand Modeling & Facility Selection | Districtwide | FDOT District Seven | Project Planner | FDOT undertook a program on “Non-motorized Travel Demand Modeling & Facility Selection.” The resulting methodology and tools enable planners and engineers to estimate usage of planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities, select the best facility type for a given situation, determine the resulting improvement in bicycling and/or walking conditions, and finally, assess the benefits relative to the investment costs. The primary work product is a series of corridor-level mode-shift and induced recreational travel models that predicts the degree to which the construction of a non-motorized facility along a corridor will induce a shift from the motor vehicle mode to the bicycle and/or pedestrian modes and/or will induce recreational trip activity. Peyton led the development of the network connectivity measure fundamental to the models and led the statewide multimodal user survey effort. *Sustainable Communities Calculator | Capital Region Transportation Planning Agency (CRTPA) | Project Planner | Peyton co- developed this decision-making tool for the Tallahassee region to assist the regional planning agency in its selection of their preferred growth scenario. This policy testing tool enables elected officials to see first-hand the direct long-term fiscal effects of their pending policy decisions and the impacts on metropolitan growth patterns and fiscal sustainability. It enables the true linking of land use, transportation decisions and public investments by simultaneously showing their combined effects on fiscal impacts to jurisdictions’ transportation system operations and maintenance budgets and other public services. The Calculator enables decision makers to test “on-the-fly” the fiscal impacts of development pattern options. *FHWA Characteristics of Emerging Trail Users & Their Safety | Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) | Data Analyst | This study evaluated the physical and operational characteristics of numerous emerging road and shared use path users. Evaluated users include bicyclists, in-line skaters, users of various assistive devices, kick scooters, skateboards, and hand cycles. The findings of this seminal project have been implemented in future national design standards for shared use paths and roadways. Peyton was the lead data analyst for video data from trail observations in California, Maryland, and Florida. *University Ave. (SR 26) Multimodal Emphasis Corridor Study | Alachua County, FL | FDOT District Two/Gainesville MTPO | Project Planner | Peyton coordinated this FDOT-funded corridor study which will help link the various modes of transportation to reduce traffic conflicts and enhance flow on University Avenue, a key transportation corridor connecting the University of Florida, downtown Gainesville, and the neighborhoods of East Gainesville. Peyton led the study’s stakeholder walking tour, facilitated the community workshops, and prioritized candidate projects for additional Phase 2 study and cost estimating. *Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan | Florida-Alabama TPO | Project Planner | This three-county regional active transportation plan is guiding the TPO in identifying and funding facility improvements. Peyton led the development of the study network, guided the client’s selection of evaluation methodology, collected and compiled data, compiled inventory of facilities and created GIS-based maps portraying bicycle paths/lanes, paved shoulders, and multi-use paths. The subsequent phase evaluated conditions and demand, recommended new or retrofitting of facilities and established prioritization. *Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Action Plans | Polk County, FL | Polk TPO | Project Planner | Between 2006 and 2015, more than 2,400 people were injured in bicycle- or pedestrian-related crashes in Polk County, FL, and another 170 were killed as a result. In an effort to greatly reduce those statistics, the Polk County Transportation Planning Organization (Polk TPO) developed Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Action Plans. The planning team, co-led by Peyton, analyzed more than 1,350 crashes, and crash typed more than 800 of those to identify who was involved in these crashes, where were they occurring, and what were the contributing causes. Crash types were tied to local demographics and land-use patterns allowing for the formulation of truly localized safety action plans. *Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan | Indian River County, FL | Indian River County MPO | Project Planner | This bicycle and pedestrian master plan document includes Level of Service and Latent Demand analyses of the entire arterial and collector street network in the Indian River County MPO. Additionally, detailed safety analyses were conducted around two elementary school and recommendations made to improve access and safety to the schools. A quantitative evaluation of each roadway segment in the study network was performed to develop a benefit/cost index and set priorities for funding. Tampa | Bartow | Winter Park Certified DBE & MBE patelgreene.com 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP)     [1]    Sage Kamiya, PE, PTOE Project Manager 3 PROFILE Sage Kamiya has over 23 years of professional engineering experience in both public and private sectors. Over this time, he has been responsible for various engineering responsibilities, including project management, traffic design, transportation planning, budget development, traffic operations and studies, advanced traffic management system (ATMS) design and implementation, and traffic management center (TMC) operations. Prior to VIBE, he served as Manatee County’s Public Works Deputy Director, Manatee County’s Traffic Engineer/Division Manager, and Sarasota County’s Transportation Planning Manager. His responsibilities consisted of traffic impact studies, concurrency transportation, comprehensive transportation planning, traffic signal design, signage and pavement marking design, capital improvement program (CIP) project management, representing Manatee County’s interest in two county-wide Advanced Traffic Management System projects, and daily operations of the Sarasota-Manatee Regional Traffic Management Center. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Florida Statewide Arterial Management Program (STAMP) I-4 Florida’s Regional Advanced Mobility Elements (FRAME) Scope of Services │ FDOT Central Office │Project Manager  Sage prepared the I-4 FRAME System Manager Request for Proposal. The I-4 FRAME project is expected to provide next generation traffic incident management, arterial traffic signal management and operations, work zone traffic management, and provide support for local incident and emergency management. Technologies such as Vehicle to infrastructure (V2I), roadside units (RSUs), road weather alerts, dedicated short-range communications (DSRC), signal phase and timing (SPaT), and automated traffic signal performance measures (ATSPMs) will be employed with the I-4 FRAME project. The research and understanding of these technologies and the area’s existing infrastructure inventory was essential for the creation of a valuable scope of services.   Florida Statewide Arterial Management Program (STAMP) – Statewide Impact Assessment of Signalized Arterial Roadways │ FDOT Central Office │Project Manager  This project is an assessment of Return on Investment (ROI) as a result of benefits realized from operational and safety improvements on signalized arterial highways. Sage is working with Central Office to develop a methodology for analyzing Department projects throughout the state, research before and after traffic data, analyze the impacts of the projects on corridor traffic signal operations, traffic safety and pedestrian safety, and provide a complete assessment report on those findings. Wrong-Way Vehicle Detection Systems (WWVDS)│Pinellas and Hillsborough Counties, FL│FDOT District Seven │Project Manager As Project Manager for the wrong-way vehicle detection system, Sage is leading design efforts for the design of 20 WWVDS systems on interstate ramps in Pinellas and Hillsborough counties. This project is unique in that the design was not manufacturer-specific and was Years of Experience:  23 Education:  BS, Civil Engineering, Florida State University, 1995  Master of Business Administration, University of South Florida, 2006 Professional Registration:  PE : FL #57499 (2001)  PTOE: FL #3071 (2011)  Florida Department of Transportation Advanced Temporary Traffic Control Certified Affiliations:  Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)  Intelligent Transportation Society of Florida  Florida Engineering Society  American Society of Civil Engineers Awards:  Transportation Engineer of the Year - Florida Section Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012  Project of the Year – American Society of Civil Engineers Suncoast Branch, 2012  Government Engineer of the Year - American Society of Civil Engineers Suncoast Branch, 2009 Leadership:  2013 and 2017 Sarasota/Manatee Metropolitan Planning Organization (SM MPO) Technical Advisory Committee Chairman  2016 Past President District 10/Florida Section ITE 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Sage Kamiya, PE, PTOE Project Manager 3   [2]   developed to be open to all WWVDS manufacturers. Design efforts included both electrical line power services and solar applications, both cellular wireless and fiber optic communication to connect to the Tampa Bay Sunguide® Center, and appropriate detection zone and wrong-way sign placement. This project is designed to meet the District’s safety objectives to reduce wrong-way driving on area interstate ramps.   2017 and 2013 Sarasota/Manatee Metropolitan Planning Organization (SM MPO) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Chairman As Manatee County’s representative on the SM MPO Technical Advisory Committee for seven years, Sage was active in assisting MPO staff in developing dozens of plans and providing guiding recommendations to the MPO and their staff. In 2017 and 2013, Sage was the TAC Chair. Sage was instrumental in the development of the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) update, the Bicycle/Pedestrian/Trails Master Plan, and the preparation of performance measures in accordance with the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for the MPO. 44th Avenue East from US41 to 19th St E, Signalization, Signing and Pavement Marking Plans | Manatee County, FL | Manatee County | Senior Transportation Engineer Sage designed the signalization and signing and pavement marking plans for the 44th Ave E roadway project from US 41 to 19th St E. This project required FDOT and CSX Railroad permitting due to railroad pre-emption. Coordination with stormwater and roadway design was also an integral part of this project. Manatee County ATMS Phase I | Manatee County, FL| Manatee County | County Project Manager Sage was the owner’s lead for implementation and acceptance of the state-of-the-art technologies to mitigate traffic congestion and improve traffic operations and traffic management in Manatee County. Deployment included installing and integrating 143 traffic signals, 38 closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras, 40 microwave based vehicle detection units, 70 miles of fiber communication to the traffic management center. This project also included building out the TMC facility; central software implementation, seven operator stations and a 15 cube video wall. Manatee County ATMS Phase II | Manatee County, FL | Manatee County | County Project Manager This project expanded on the Manatee County ATMS Phase I project. Sage was the County’s lead in the integration and acceptance of adding 88 traffic signal upgrades, 44 miles of fiber communication, 20 CCTV monitoring cameras, 20 vehicle detection system devices, connecting the City of Palmetto, and a communication hub for Sarasota County’s ATMS projects. Traffic Signal Retiming ATMS Phase I | Manatee County, FL | Manatee County | County Project Manager Sage was the County Project Manager for this traffic signal retiming project which included 134 intersections on 11 corridors in Manatee County. An important aspect of this project was ensuring that signal timing was implemented appropriately as this project was on-going concurrently with the Manatee County ATMS project. Traffic Signal Retiming ATMS Phase II | Manatee County, FL | Manatee County | County Project Manager Sage was responsible for ensuring proper implementation as the owner’s representative and ultimate maintainer and appropriate coordination with County and City of Palmetto staff. This project consisted of a retiming study of 88 signalized intersections throughout Manatee County, including the City of Palmetto. The scope of work consisted of traffic count collection activities, field review and inventory of traffic controller data, travel time studies, analyses of existing and future conditions (with improvements) of intersections and corridors, report preparation and documentation. Sarasota-Manatee Regional Traffic Management Center Operations | Manatee County, FL | Sarasota-Manatee RTMC | RTMC Manager Sage was responsible for the day-to-day management of the Sarasota-Manatee Regional Traffic Management Center (RTMC). Responsibilities included supervision of operators and systems engineering staff, shift management, traffic signal monitoring coordination, incident management, developing operating plans for the center, incorporation of additional ATMS devices, guiding central software upgrades, and eventually hiring and supervising the RTMC Manager. This also included coordinating with the regional Intelligent Transportation Management Team members from Sarasota County, City of Sarasota, City of Palmetto, City of Bradenton, and Manatee County for managing expectations and operations of the center. Sage also developed and achieved buy-in of operational agreements which were ultimately adopted by each government stakeholder. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) [1] Arthur Tester, PE Traffic/ITS Engineer PROFILE With over five years of experience in transportation engineering, Arthur Tester, PE, has been responsible for planning, designing, and implementing various signing and pavement marking, lighting, and Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS)/Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) projects in many Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Districts. He is currently developing a Request for Proposals (RFP) and conceptual plans for a section of I-75 in FDOT District Seven. He has recently designed a flashing beacon system and wrong- way detection system under the FDOT District Seven Districtwide Design- Build Pushbutton contract, and served as a lead technical resource for the Network Study and Analysis of the Collier County Traffic Operations networks infrastructure. Prior to joining VIBE, Arthur had over 13 years of experience in the electronics industry that easily transports over to his work in transportation. As a Traffic/ITS Engineer, he is responsible for preparing contractual documents, comprehensive construction drawing packages for signing and pavement marking, lighting, and ATMS/ITS projects, and conducting on- site visits to determine existing conditions and device placement for equipment. PROJECT EXPERIENCE I-75 from Big Bend Road to Progress Boulevard | Hillsborough County, FL | FDOT D7 | Traffic/ITS Engineer Arthur assisted in the development of the RFP for the ITS on I-75 from Big Bend Road to Progress Boulevard for D7. He coordinated with the District to determine the requirements for the project that include adding CCTV cameras, ADMSs, DMSs, and MVDSs to the existing ITS infrastructure and replacing a segment of existing fiber topic cable. Arthur developed the conceptual plans based on the RFP requirements. Arthur coordinated with Central Office to finalize the RFP that was used to bid the project. Districtwide ITS Consultant | Districtwide, FL | FDOT D7 | Traffic/ITS Engineer VIBE serves as an extension of the FDOT District Seven ITS staff and provides professional services in support of the existing, developing, and future initiatives for the District Seven SunGuide® ITS program. Under this contract, Arthur performed a feasibility study to assess the implementation of ramp signals along I-275 and I-4. This study used volume data provided by the District and thresholds developed by Florida International University to determine if ramp metering should be recommended for the ramps onto the interstates in the Tampa Bay area. He also reviews plans for the District, and is currently preparing an RFP document for the I-275 Howard Frankland Bridge project. Waycare Study | Tampa, FL | City of Tampa | Traffic/ITS Engineer Arthur is evaluating the performance of the City of Tampa’s Waycare pilot using data provided by the Waycare system, FDOT Sunguide, and the Crash Data Management System (CDMS). He coordinated with the Nevada Regional Transportation Center (RTC), the Nevada Transportation Management Center (TMC), and the Nevada Highway Patrol (NHP), for use cases and findings. He is responsible for analyzing the data to determine the impacts on emergency responder response and clearance times and determine the effectiveness of the software’s prediction algorithm. He is also responsible for preparing a document to report the findings, use cases, and impacts on traffic safety and flow, incident management, and operator workflow. Collier County Network Study and Analysis | Collier County, FL | Collier County, FL | Transportation Engineer Intern Arthur served as a lead technical resource responsible for the study and analysis of Collier County’s Traffic Operations network. Tasks included developing a network diagram of the existing network, developing plans to incorporate redundancy and adding a Layer 3 routing solution, identifying modern network security standards, and creating a video broadcasting web server for internal and external users. Arthur assisted in the development of a comprehensive Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) based on FDOT standards. Years of Experience: • 5 Education: • BS, Civil Engineering, University of South Florida, 2012 Professional Registration: • P.E: Florida – No. 86666 (2019) • Advanced Maintenance of Traffic Certification: Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) (2015) • International Municipal Signal Association (IMSA), Traffic Signals Technician, Level II (2017) Affiliations: • Intelligent Transportation Society of Florida • Tampa Bay Institute of Transportation Engineers • American Society of Civil Engineers 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Arthur E. Tester Traffic/ITS Engineer [2] Keystone Road ATMS and Lighting Design | Pinellas County, FL | Pinellas County, FL | ITS Designer Arthur served as the designer responsible for developing ITS and lighting plans for this project. The ITS design plans included adding fiber optic cable for communications, one arterial DMS, and five CCTV cameras along Keystone Road between US 19 and East Lake Road. The lighting design plans included 3.2 miles of proposed lighting that required an analysis for three corridors and two intersections. I-95 Express Phase 3B-2 Ramp Metering | FDOT D4 | Traffic/ITS Engineer Arthur is responsible for preparing design plans for a Ramp Signaling System for the three interchanges on I-95. The plans include passage, demand, and queue loop detectors, ramp signal, ramp signal cabinet, signing and flashing beacons. He is responsible for coordinating the Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) camera and Microwave Vehicle Detection System (MVDS) placements for the ramp signal system with the team responsible for the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS), and coordinating the signal release rate with the District Traffic Operations Engineer (DTOE). Arthur will perform a queue analysis and acceleration distance analysis to determine the stop bar placement. Channelside Drive from Cumberland Avenue to Kennedy Boulevard | Tampa, FL | City of Tampa, FL | Transportation Engineer Intern Arthur performed a roundabout feasibility analysis for the intersection of Channelside Drive and East Kennedy Boulevard using guidance from National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 672, volume data from Florida Traffic Online, and field data. The analysis considered Right-of-Way (ROW) acquisition necessary for the roundabout footprint based on the volume data, observations of queue lengths, and impacts to the TECO Line Streetcar System and neighboring businesses. Districtwide Continuing Services ITS | Statewide, FL | FTE | Traffic/ITS Engineer VIBE serves as a general ITS consultant for the FTE and its system of toll roads throughout the State of Florida. Tasks include developing studies, concepts, design memorandums, and construction plans in order to improve the Turnpike’s ITS. Under this contract, Arthur assisted in preparing the signing and pavement design plans and ITS design plans for the Florida SunTrax Test Facility along the east side of the Polk Parkway. Countywide Traffic Signal Retiming | Pinellas County, FL | Pinellas County, FL | Transportation Engineering Intern Arthur was responsible for measuring the intersection widths, approach grades, and pedestrian crosswalks at 91 intersections throughout Pinellas County. These measurements were used to calculate all-red clearance intervals, yellow clearance intervals, and Flashing Walk/Don’t Walk times. He also took inventory of pavement markings at each intersection. Final reports were developed to show the collected data, and recommended clearance intervals were given for each intersection. Lee County ATMS/ITS Master Plan and Design-Bid-Build Criteria Package | Lee County, FL | FDOT D1 | Traffic/ITS Engineer Arthur assisted in the preparation of the Design-Bid-Build Criteria Package for Phase 2 of the Lee County ATMS. He also assisted in updating the ATMS/ITS Master Plan that was developed during the first phase of this project. Arthur was responsible for updating the fiber optic network and ITS device figures for the ATMS/ITS Master Plan. He also was responsible for the field review and design of the layout for the phase 2 fiber optic network, and for creating the plan sheets and splice diagrams for the project. Arthur also assisted in verifying MVDS software requirements and compatibility with the existing ATMS. Arthur is currently providing post-design services. Districtwide Design-Build Pushbutton | Districtwide | FDOT D7 | Traffic/ITS Engineer Arthur is responsible for the design of ITS related tasks under the FDOT D7 Districtwide Pushbutton contract. Tasks have included MVDSs to detect congestion and flashing beacon signs to provide advance notice to drivers that will communicate through the fiber optic network, and wrong-way detection systems that utilize MVDSs, CCTV cameras, flashing beacons, and fiber optic infrastructure. ATMS and ATCS Deployment in Broward and Palm Beach Counties Design-Build | Palm Beach County | FDOT D4 | Transportation Engineer Intern Arthur was responsible for preparing design plans for an ATMS/ITS deployment on SR 80, Northlake Boulevard, and Okeechobee Boulevard. The plans included CCTV cameras, DMSs, MVDSs, and a Bluetooth Travel Time System. Arthur also developed design plans for the InSync Adaptive Traffic Control Systems (ATCSs) on Northlake Boulevard and Okeechobee Boulevard. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE As highlighted in Tab 1, Tindale Oliver currently serves as a prime GPC to 15 of Florida’s 27 MPOs. The experience we have gained during the last 30 years of working with MPOs through more than 50 GPC contracts includes all work items identified in the Collier MPO’s Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) and scope of services. Reference Questionnaires and Project Summaries As requested in the solicitation, Reference Questionnaire forms for projects similar in size, type, and complexity to the Metropolitan Planning General Services Planning Contract are included in this section, as are detailed project summaries for each. Referenced projects include: > Sarasota/Manatee MPO General Planning Consultant Services > Hillsborough MPO General Planning Consultant Services > Polk TPO General Planning Consultant Services > Broward MPO Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan > Lee County MPO General Planning Consultant Services > St. Lucie TPO Metropolitan Planning Consultant Services > Hernando/Citrus MPO Metropolitan Planning Consultant Services 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 2 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 3 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Tindale Oliver has served as a General Planning Consultant to the Sarasota/ Manatee MPO since 2008, conducting task work orders in the areas of congestion management, transit planning, multimodal emphasis corridor studies, safety performance measurement, project prioritization, and long-range transportation planning support. Representative Task Work Orders (15+) > Safety Performance Measurement and Road Safety Audits > Congestion Management Process (multiple task orders) > Miscellaneous support for LRTP > Lakewood Ranch Transit Service Plan > US-41 Multimodal Emphasis Corridor Analysis and Project Prioritization Process (multiple task orders) > Corridor Management/Preservation white paper Knowledge > Specialists in metropolitan planning requirements, from the first transportation authorization (ISTEA) to the latest reauthorization (FAST Act). > Expert knowledge in safety performance measures, crash data analysis, and Road Safety Audits. > Local knowledge and understanding to ensure that GPC support meets the specific needs of the MPO. > Procedures for serving as an extension of staff, providing on-call support and major task work order support in a timely manner. Insights > Identification of unmet transit demand in the Lakewood Ranch area of Manatee County. > Need for a more comprehensive approach to congestion management to meet requirements and customize the process to support local needs and priorities. > Understanding and application of performance measures and target-setting for performance-based planning. Outcomes > Effective incorporation of safety performance measurement into the LRTP. > Updated Congestion Management Process that meets metropolitan planning requirements and coordinates data from agencies throughout the MPO’s planning area. > Realistic and implementable transit service plan that connects Lakewood Ranch to existing transit services in Manatee and Sarasota counties. > Process and tool for evaluating and prioritizing improvement projects on the US-41 Multimodal Emphasis Corridor. General Planning Consultant Sarasota/Manatee MPO Tindale Oliver Contact: Wally Blain, AICP Senior Project Manager 1000 N. Ashley Dr., Suite 400 Tampa, FL 33602 (813) 224-8862 wblain@tindaleoliver.com Client Contact: David Hutchinson, Executive Director Sarasota/Manatee MPO 7632 15th Street East Sarasota, FL 34243 (941) 359-5772 dave@mympo.org Tindale Oliver developed a process and tool for evaluating and prioritizing multimodal improvement projects on US-41. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 4 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services US-41 Multi Modal Emphasis Corridor Gap and Safety Analysis The US-41 MMEC Analysis was conducted to evaluate the program’s effectiveness and determine if any changes to the program’s goals, objectives, and strategies were needed to address the MPO’s performance measures and performance targets as input for determining LRTP funding decisions. Recommendations at 12 locations along the corridor were based on analysis and review of the existing conditions including: > Traffic volumes > FDOT context sensitive classifications > Active transportation facilities and services > Existing land uses 2045 LRTP Safety and security assessments were conducted prior to the LRTP that identified strategies and recommendations for the MPO to advance and consider as part of the Transform 2045 LRTP. During development, Tindale Oliver provided documentation and graphic support to the MPO. Research on emerging technology trends and application allowed the MPO to identify funding allocations related to the adopted goals of the LRTP. The MPO’s LRTP is based on the eight goals of: > Equity and Livability > Environment and Conservation > Freight and Economy > Safety and Security > Mobility and Reliability > Infrastructure and Resiliency > Technology > Project Delivery The Technology/Autonomy Report included research on advanced and emerging transportation technologies. Key takeaways from this research identified the challenges and opportunities facing the MPO. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 5 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 6 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Since 1996, Tindale Oliver has served as a General Planning Consultant to the Hillsborough MPO on numerous contracts, serving as the prime consultant for more than 20 of these years. Key areas of support include safety and crash data analysis, bicycle/pedestrian planning and safety, multimodal corridor studies, and transit/transportation disadvantaged planning, among others. Representative Task Work Orders (60+) > Vision Zero Corridor Studies > 2045 LRTP Needs Assessment > Community Transportation Coordinator Evaluations > Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan > Dale Mabry Pedestrian Overpass Study > West Tampa Multimodal Plan > Evaluation of Multimodal Level of Service & Multimodal Transportation District Criteria > City of Tampa Comprehensive Plan Mobility Element Update > City of Tampa Walk-Bike Facilities Plan > Green ARTery Trail Plan > East Hillsborough Avenue Multimodal Corridor Study Knowledge > Practical understanding of socio-economic data projection process, especially related to infill and redevelopment potential and applications for fire, schools and other public services beyond transportation planning. > Extensive experience integrating traffic safety into LRTPs and CMPs consistent with federal transportation legislation. > Multimodal systems and corridor planning expertise. Insights > Established methodology for identifying low-cost/feasible bike and pedestrian improvements to complement traditional “systems” planning approaches. > Integrated multimodal mobility planning with pedestrian and bicycle safety objectives. Outcomes > Identified feasible (little/no right-of-way or roadway reconstruction) bicycle and pedestrian facilities projects to complete access to Tampa’s business centers and provide for mobility throughout city. > Developed alternative future land use scenarios for LRTP public preference and policy evaluation leading to preferred hybrid scenario that combines urban infill and redevelopment with expansion of key economic spaces in suburban areas. General Planning Consultant Hillsborough MPO Tindale Oliver Contact: Demian Miller, AICP Principal 1000 N. Ashley Drive, Suite 400 Tampa, FL 33602 (813) 224-8862 dmiller@tindaleoliver.com Client Contact: Beth Alden MPO Executive Director Hillsborough MPO 601 E. Kennedy Blvd., 18th Floor Tampa, FL 33602 (813) 273-3774, ext. 318 aldenb@plancom.org Tindale Oliver has supported the Hillsborough MPO with numerous bicycle/pedestrian planning and safety projects. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 7 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Vision Zero Corridor Studies Tindale Oliver is currently analyzing three corridors for the Hillsborough County MPO identified as part of the Vision Zero Action Plan. These corridor studies are evaluating existing transportation infrastructure conditions, land use, transit services, and socio-economic factors to identify fatal and serious injury crash reduction countermeasures. School Safety Study Working with the MPO and the School Safety Working Group, the school safety study has prioritize public school areas based on a data-driven method. Studies of each school site included mobility reviews that resulted in a list of actionable safety and mobility improvements. Filling sidewalk gaps adjacent to schools and major transportation corridors is an example of an infrastructure related recommendation included in the study. Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan During the 2018 TDSP update, recommendations for communicating between the CTC and Coordinated Contractors were made in addition to the review of service needs. Improving communications with and between the service provides assistance with better meeting the growing trip demand by better communicating and coordinating available capacity and demand needs. Existing Land Use Transit Boardings Households below Poverty 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 8 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 9 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Tindale Oliver has served as a General Planning Consultant to the Polk TPO since 2007. Task orders have included an update of the Transit Development Finance Plan, development of a Polk Transportation Vision Plan, update of the Transit Development Plan, development of transit design features for the US 98 corridor, and others as assigned. Representative Task Work Orders (25+) > ACES Investment Strategy research and analysis for inclusion in the 2045 LRTP > Transit Development Plans > Revenue forecasting and impact fee studies > Trip characteristic studies for land use analysis > Travel data collection and program maintenance Knowledge > Locally-based, an in-depth understanding of local growth, priorities, goals, and agencies. > Public agency experience and understanding that ensures plans provide implementable solutions and strategic decision points. Insights > Plans and studies vetted to build consensus on moving forward with supported recommendations and phased implementation. > Specialized to incorporate niche modal, safety, access, and other items necessary to make each project truly valuable. Outcomes > Adaptable plans that innovatively meet needs of multiple communities and the county as a whole. > Public engagement that garners input from different demographic audiences, educates public officials and citizens, and builds consensus to implement solutions with positive impact. > Development of new tools and resources that facilitate education and makes job of clients easier. > Provision of phased action plans designed to meet minimum requirements and accomplished much more. General Planning Consultant Polk TPO Tindale Oliver Contact: Robert E. Cursey, Jr., AICP Principal/Director of Metropolitan Transportation Planning 1000 N. Ashley Drive, Suite 400 Tampa, FL 33602 (813) 224-8862 RCursey@tindaleoliver.com Client Contact: Chandra C. Frederick, AICP Assistant County Manager, Planning & Development, TPO Executive Dir. Polk TPO 330 West Church Street Bartow, FL 33830 (863) 534-6454 chandrafrederick@polk-county.net 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 10 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services ACES Investment Strategy Research A major component of Polk County’s 2045 LRTP is considering and incorporating Automated, Connected, Electric, and Shared-use (ACES) vehicle technology impacts as part of the planning process. The TPO developed a 2045 Investment Strategy to guide the LRTP update that provides guidance on how ACES projects, policies, and programs will be considered and incorporated into the LRTP. This three-phase research included a review of technology adoption rates, demographic review, and identification of recommended strategies related to transportation policy and implementation for sub-areas and corridors within Polk County. The Polk My Ride Plan received the 2012 Public Involvement Award from the Heart of Florida American Planning Association. My Ride TDP The Polk My Ride Plan was recognized for its public engagement, including development of 19 subarea plans (one for each municipality) and intra- and inter-county services. This was key to educating all elected boards, stakeholders, and communities about the relevance and impact the plan provides for three transit agencies in the county. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 11 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 12 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Tindale Oliver was selected by the Broward MPO to work collaboratively with MPO staff to develop the Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and Transit Systems Plan. In addition to establishing a vision for future transportation and growth in the Broward region, the MTP also ensures that the MPO is meeting the requirements of the FAST Act as well as federal and State metropolitan transportation planning requirements. Knowledge > Understanding of existing and future demographics, travel behavior, land use, growth, and economic development. > Leveraging significant previous plans and studies completed by the MPO and its partners throughout the region. > Application of knowledge and experience in metropolitan transportation and transit planning to creatively develop a new and innovative approach to the MTP. > Understanding and integration of transportation, growth, and land use goals of Broward County and its 31 municipalities. > Understanding of transportation revenue sources for developing revenue projections and applying revenues to a program of projects consistent with their eligible uses. Insights > Updated goals, objectives, and performance measures to correspond to MPO Board’s vision and support a performance-based planning process. > Effective use of scenario planning that considers five scenarios (Trend, Compact Development, Technology, Resiliency, and Community Vision). > Comprehensive travel demand and transit market segmentation analysis that identifies high-opportunity transit corridors and areas and leads to development of an unconstrained transit vision for the Broward region. > Development and execution of project prioritization process and scenario evaluation to support development of 2045 Needs and Financially-Feasible Plans. > Integration of a Transportation Planning Equity Tool developed by Tindale Oliver in collaboration with the MPO as part of a separate project (helps to address equity and Environmental Justice). > Significant public participation process carried out in collaboration with MPO staff using numerous techniques, including outreach meetings, public workshops, telephone town hall meetings, surveys, website, social media, and infographics. Outcomes > MPO Board consensus on vision for transportation in the Broward region, including unconstrained transit vision in coordination with key stakeholders (Broward County Transit and South Florida Regional Transportation Authority). > Adoption of 2045 LRTP that meets federal and State metropolitan planning requirements. Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Broward MPO Tindale Oliver Contact: Bill Ball, AICP Chief Operating Officer 1000 N. Ashley Drive, Suite 400 Tampa, FL 33602 (813) 224-8862 BBall@tindaleoliver.com Client Contact: Peter Gies Regional Transportation Planner Broward MPO 100 Cypress Creek Road, Suite 650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 (954) 876-0033 Giesp@browardmpo.org An E-Townhall was facilitated in March 2018 that involved nearly 1,200 participants at its peak and sustained an estimated 170 participants 60 minutes into the call. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 13 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Tindale Oliver worked collaboratively with Broward MPO staff to develop the Commitment 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), which established a vision for future transportation and growth in Broward and ensured that the MPO is meeting requirements of the FAST Act and federal and State metropolitan transportation planning requirements. In addition to evaluating transportation and land use scenarios based on public input and current policy considerations, the Commitment 2045 MTP included a vision for 2100. Excerpts from infographic communicating results of online survey conducted as part of Commitment 2045 MTP. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 14 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 15 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Description of Services Provided Tindale Oliver has served as a General Planning Consultant to the Lee County MPO since 2000, supporting the MPO with long-range transportation planning support, transit planning, crash data management and analysis, bicycle/ pedestrian planning, transit funding and governance, and transportation finance. Representative Task Work Orders (25+) > Long Range Transit Element (multiple updates) > Long Range Transportation Plan Public Involvement and Documentation > Long Range Transportation Plan Socioeconomic Mapping and Graphics > Sanibel Shared-Use Path Master Plan > Cape Coral Downtown Transit Study > Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Action Plan > Transit Funding and Governance Study > Crash Data Management System > Long Range Transportation Plan Revenue Forecast > Transit Authority Action Plan and Support Knowledge > Specialists in metropolitan planning requirements, from first transportation authorization (ISTEA) to latest reauthorization (FAST Act). > Expert knowledge in transportation performance measurement, including safety performance measures, crash data analysis, and road safety audits. Insights > Understanding of public and policy viewpoints associated with need and support for dedicated public transportation funding source. > As GPC to both MPO and LeeTran, able to apply long-term perspective of county and regional transportation needs to multimodal planning. Outcomes > Established long-term action plan for County’s potential pursuit of dedicated revenue source for public transportation. > Developed multimodal planning solutions to ensure safe and effective future transportation options for Lee County. > Continue to work with staff to plan for near- and longer-term opportunities to address community mobility needs. General Planning Contract Lee County MPO Tindale Oliver Contact: Wally Blain, AICP Senior Project Manager 1000 N. Ashley Dr., Suite 400 Tampa, FL 33602 (813) 224-8862 wblain@tindaleoliver.com Client Contact: Don Scott Executive Director Lee County MPO 815 Nicholas Parkway East P.O. Box 150045 Cape Coral, FL 33915-0045 239-330-2241 dscott@leempo.com Tindale Oliver has supported the Lee County MPO with numerous multimodal transportation planning projects over the past two decades. Shown are bus routes for transit analysis. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 16 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Sanibel Shared Use Path Master Plan The Shared Use Path Master Plan update included a review and update to the Plan’s vision, goals, and objectives, update of the inventory of existing paths and path support systems, evaluation of path use and users, review of recommendations from previous planning and engineering efforts related to the Path system, evaluation to identify improvements to address Path system gaps and enhance the safety and comfort of the existing system, and evaluation of existing funding mechanisms to maintain and implement enhancements to the Shared Use Path system. 2045 LRTP Tindale Oliver is currently supporting the Lee County MPO on two major elements of the 2045 LRTP. Public Involvement and Documentation Report documentation and presentation materials are being prepared for documenting the analysis conducted for the LRTP. Facilitating workshops and providing information to the public are key elements of the plan update. Long Range Transit Element Evaluating the transit needs and affordability of future services is built on the TDP. Tindale Oliver’s LRTE approach blends the technical demand based analysis with the input and community vision of the public. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 17 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 18 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Tindale Oliver has served as a General Planning Consultant to the St. Lucie TPO since 2009. Task orders have included annual traffic counts, development of Transit Development Plan, traffic impact studies methodologies and procedures. Representative Task Work Orders (20) > Jobs Express Terminal Connectivity Study > Annual Traffic Counts and WebLOS Application updates > Transit Development Plan updates > GO2040 LRTP > Traffic Impact Studies Methodology and Procedures Knowledge > Specialists in metropolitan planning requirements, from first transportation authorization (ISTEA) to latest reauthorization (MAP-21). > As a prime consultant, currently serve 11 Florida MPO/TPO as GPC; reselected numerous times, with 35 prime contract since 1994. Currently serve as sub-consultant on 3 MPO/TPO GPCs, currently serving 14 Florida MPO/TPOs under GPC contracts. > Supported TPO on several different assignments and as a staff extension when needed. Insights > Understanding importance of making best and most efficient use of TPO’s limited resources. > Support TPO on collecting and making easily available to local government consultants data needed during planning processes. Outcomes > Developed and managed state-of-the-art web-based applications, including Crash Data Management System, Traffic Count Data Collection and Management, and LOS Analysis and Reporting. > Supported TPO, St. Lucie County, and Community Transit with preparing TDPs, evaluating transit governance alternatives, and supporting Regional Transit Organization. > 7 completed task orders and 2 ongoing, including: − Traffic Counts, Level of Service, Crash Data Management web applications − Annual Traffic Counts Data Collection − Development of 10-Year TDP − St. Lucie TPO Standardized Traffic Impact Studies Methodologies and Procedures General Planning Contract St. Lucie TPO Tindale Oliver Contact: Robert E. Cursey, Jr., AICP Principal/Director of Metropolitan Transportation Planning 1000 N. Ashley Drive, Suite 400 Tampa, FL 33602 (813) 224-8862 RCursey@tindaleoliver.com Client Contact: Peter Buchwald, AICP Executive Director St. Lucie TPO 466 SW Port Lucie Blvd., #111 Port St. Lucie, FL 34953 772-462-1593 BuchwaldP@stlucieco.org Recommendations from the Jobs Express Terminal Connectivity Study focused on identifying multimodal transportation solutions. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 19 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Traffic Counts and Level of Service Since 2010, Tindale Oliver has provided annual traffic count support to the St. Lucie TPO. In 2011, a web- based Level of Service application was developed for displaying the traffic counts and roadway conditions. Jobs Express Terminal Connectivity Study During the design phase of a Jobs Express Park-and-Ride Terminal on Gatlin Boulevard in Port St. Lucie, this study identified pedestrian and bicycle accommodations needed to provide accessibility to the site, including identification of bike lanes, traffic signal operations, sidewalk gaps, and lighting, and development of a series of recommendations incorporating Mobility on Demand options. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 20 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 21 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Tindale Oliver has served as a General Planning Consultant to the Hernando- Citrus MPO since 1993. Task orders have included LRTPs and TDPs, congestion management plans, corridor and safety studies, performance monitoring and traffic counts, and ADA compliance and accessibility. Tindale Oliver also provided public finance planning in conjunction with the County. Representative Task Work Orders (90+) > Annual Traffic Counts > Transportation Impact Fee Update Studies > Development of Complete Streets Policy > TDP Updates > 2040 LRTP and SE Data Development > Trails and Bikeways Master Plan > SR 50 One-way Reversion Corridor Study > Coast-to-Coast Trail Good Neighbor Gap Trail Feasibility > Congestion Management Process Updates Knowledge > Specialists in metropolitan planning requirements, from first transportation authorization (ISTEA) to latest reauthorization (FAST). > Extension of staff, including representation in various meetings. > Provide timely and accurate support on major task orders and special requests. Insights > Understanding of Hernando County transportation issues and opportunities as well as context of region, including knowledge of Citrus County. > In-depth understanding through public engagement activities with major stakeholders and through consensus-building activities. > Integration of multimodal transportation and land use planning. Outcomes > Targeted infrastructure and investments in Hernando smart-growth areas in the future. > Development of congestion management plans that led to real, actionable projects. > Plans that leverage existing revenue sources to fund multimodal transportation system and identification of opportunities for future revenues. General Planning Contract Hernando-Citrus MPO Tindale Oliver Contact: Robert E. Cursey, Jr., AICP Principal/Director of Metropolitan Transportation Planning 1000 N. Ashley Drive, Suite 400 Tampa, FL 33602 (813) 224-8862 RCursey@tindaleoliver.com Client Contact: Steve Diez Executive Director Hernando/Citrus MPO 20 N. Broad Street, Room 262 Brooksville, FL 34601 352-754-4082 StevenD@HernandoCounty.us 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PAST PERFORMANCE 2 2 - 22 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Good Neighbor Trail Tindale Oliver was commissioned by the Hernando/Citrus MPO to identify the locally-preferred trail alignment to complete the “Brooksville Gap” of the cross Florida Coast-to-Coast Trail. Prior to the project, the gap was proposed to be filled by an alignment that did not incorporate the City’s vision for the future, and the City had its own adopted alignment that was different from the proposed. Complete Streets Policy and Implementation Guidance Tindale Oliver assisted the Hernando/Citrus MPO with research, development, and implementation of a Complete Streets Policy and Plan that provides the MPO with the necessary guidance to move forward with implementing a formal Complete Streets Program and is a follow-up implementation step of the Bikeways and Trails Master Plan conducted by Tindale Oliver. Final preferred alignment for Brooksville segment of Coast-to-Coast Connector. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RECENT, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WORKLOADS OF THE FIRM Staff Availability Staff availability is a critical factor in the selection of a consultant. As a general services contract that extends over multiple years, commitments of the project management team and staff are based on current assignments and the expectation that future assignments under existing contracts will follow previous patterns. Availability is the percentage of time allocated specifically to the Collier MPO General Planning Services Contract and additional staff time that can be reallocated to meet the demands of individual tasks as assigned. A major component of the Tindale Oliver Team’s availability is based on the project manager’s ability to coordinate task assignments and balance staff commitments. As discussed in Tab 1, we maintain balance with general planning service contracts by distributing contract management responsibilities across multiple project managers. Information regarding the current workload and availability of our proposed project management team including Project Manager Wally Blain is provided on the following page. A Key Staff Availability Chart (page 3-3) is provided that shows individual task leader current and recently-completed assignments. The Team Availability chart on page 3-4 illustrates current commitments of staff and percent of time available for this contract. It should be noted that, in general, principals, supervisors, and senior staff have marketing, administrative, and corporate time considered as part of their unavailable time and not just time committed to ongoing or perceived projects. Project managers, production staff, and technical staff are generally more available over longer forecast periods, as the majority of their time is committed to projects and tasks with shorter production cycles. 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RECENT, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WORKLOADS OF THE FIRM 3 - 2 3 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Rob Cursey, AICP Principal-in-Charge > Pasco County MPO 2045 LRTP and CMP > FDOT D7 Intermodal Center Studies > Collier MPO General Planning Services Task Assignments > FDOT D7 Districtwide Public Transportation 50% Wally Blain, AICP Project Manager > Collier MPO Transportation System Performance Report > Charlotte-Punta Gorda MPO 2045 LRTP > Lee County MPO 2045 LRTP Public Involvement and Documentation > Sarasota/Manatee MPO 2045 LRTP Documentation > Collier MPO General Planning Services Task Assignments > Collier County HHH Ranch Corridor Alignment Study > Other MPO GPC task assignments 60% Bill Ball, AICP Senior Advisor and Quality Assurance Manager > TBARTA Envison 2030 Regional Transit Development Plan > Broward MPO 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and Broward Vision 2100 > Collier MPO General Planning Services Task Assignments > TBARTA Regional Rapid Transit PD&E Study > Smyrna (GA) Transit Feasibility Study 40% Collier MPO General Planning Services Management Team Availability (over next 12 months) Completed or Near Completion Key Project Assignments % Time Available 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RECENT, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WORKLOADS OF THE FIRM 3 - 3 3 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Key Staff/Task Leaders Completed or Near Completion Key Project Assignments % Time Available Chris Keller, AICP Sub-Area/Corridor and Multimodal > Sanibel Shared-Use Master Plan Update > Sarasota/Manatee MPO US 41 Multi Modal Emphasis Corridor Study > Collier MPO General Planning Services Task Assignments > Hillsborough County MPO Vision Zero Corridors > Sarasota County Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan 50% Demian Miller, AICP Safety > Collier MPO Local Road Safety Plan > Collier MPO Transit Impact Analysis > Collier MPO General Planning Services Task Assignments > Manatee County Mobility Fee and Master Plan > Hillsborough County MPO Speed Management 40% Jill Quigley, AICP Public Involvement > Pasco County MPO CMP > Broward MPO 2045 MTP > Collier MPO General Planning Services Task Assignments > FDOT D4 Central Broward Transit Study > HART Arterial BRT Study 40% Randy Farwell Transit > Collier Area Transit (CAT) Transit Development Plan > LeeTran Comprehensive Operations Analysis > Collier MPO General Planning Services Task Assignments > Sarasota County Fixed-Route Optimization > Palm Tran Mobility-on-Demand Deployment > Volusia County Transit TDP 35% Sarah Goolsby, GISP Transportation Disadvantaged > Pasco County TDSP > LeeTran Title VI Program > Collier MPO General Planning Services Task Assignments > FDOT D7 Subrecipient Triennial Review Support > TDP / TDSP Integration Guidebook 35% Steve Infanti, AICP Transportation Statistics > Collier County Roadway Impact Fee Funding Analysis (various locations) > Sarasota County Clark Rd/ Dove Ave Comprehensive Plan Amendment > St. Lucie TPO 2019–2020 Traffic Count Program > Collier MPO General Planning Services Task Assignments > Pasco County Build-Out Model Development for Corridor Preservation Plan > FDOT D7 Freight Bottleneck Analysis 30% Collier MPO General Planning Services Key Staff Availability (over next 12 months) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RECENT, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WORKLOADS OF THE FIRM 3 - 4 3 Collier County | Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services TO – Tindale Oliver FTE – Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc. PGA– Patel Greene & Associates VIBE – VIBEngineering, Inc. Collier MPO General Planning Services Tindale Oliver Project Team Availability 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) REQUIRED FORMS Required Forms and Attachments In accordance with RPS No.: 18-7432-MP, the following forms and attachments are included in this section: > Vendor Checklist > Form 1: Vendor Declaration Statement > Form 2: Conflict of Interest Statement > Tindale Oliver Certificate of Incorporation > Form 3: Immigration Affidavit Certification > Tindale Oliver E-Verify Company Profile Page > Form 4: Certification for Claiming Status as a Local Business (Not Applicable) > Form 5: Reference Questionnaire (included in Tab 2) > Form 6: Grant Provisions and Assurances Package > Tindale Oliver W-9 Form > Insurance and Bonding Requirements/Vendor’s Insurance Statement > Lincenses and Certifications - Team Firms and Proposed Personnel > Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 221Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 222Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 223Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 224Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) State of Florida Department of State I certify from the records of this office that TINDALE-OLIVER & ASSOCIATES,INC.is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida,filed on January 13,1989. The document number of this corporation is K58299. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31,2020,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 9,2020,and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee,the Capital,this the Ninth day of January,2020 Tracking Number:0544444660CC To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number,and then follow the instructions displayed. https://services.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertificateOfStatus/CertificateAuthentication 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 226Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 8/3/2020 E-Verify: Employer Wizard - Company Information https://e-verify.uscis.gov/web/EmployerWizard.aspx 1/3 Company Information Company Name Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Company ID Number 246268 Doing Business As (DBA) Name -- DUNS Number -- Physical Location Address 1 1000 N. Ashley Drive Address 2 Suite 400 City Tampa State FL Zip Code 33602 County HILLSBOROUGH Mailing Address Address 1 -- Address 2 -- City -- State -- Zip Code Welcome Casey Sledzinski  M E N U 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 8/3/2020 E-Verify: Employer Wizard - Company Information https://e-verify.uscis.gov/web/EmployerWizard.aspx 2/3 Last Login: 07/30/2020 07:19 AM Additional Infor mation Organization Designation View / Edit View Original MOU Template View MOU -- Employer Identification Number 592929811 Total Number of Employees 20 to 99 Parent Organization Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Administrator -- Employer Category Federal Contractor without FAR E-Verify Clause NAICS Code 541 - PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, AND TECHNICAL SERVICES View / Edit Total Hiring Sites 5 View / Edit Total Points of Contact 3 View / Edit U.S. Department of Homeland Security 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 8/3/2020 E-Verify: Employer Wizard - Company Information https://e-verify.uscis.gov/web/EmployerWizard.aspx 3/3 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Enable Permanent Tooltips Accessibility Download Viewers 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 230Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 231Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 232Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 233Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 234Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 235Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 236Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 237Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 238Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 239Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 240Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 241Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 242Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 243Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 244Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 245Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 246Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 247Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 248Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 249Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.B GRANT CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES Exhibit 1.B – 9 COLLIER COUNTY Acknowledgement of Terms, Conditions, and Grant Clauses Flow Down of Terms and Conditions from the Grant Agreement Subcontracts: If the vendor subcontracts any of the work required under this Agreement, a cop y of the signed subcontract must be available to the Department for review and approval. The vendor agrees to include in the subcontract that (1) the subcontractor is bound by the terms of this Agreement, (ii) the subcontractor is bound by all applicable state and federal laws and regulations, and (iii) the subcontractor shall hold the Department and Recipient harmless against all claims of whatever nature arising out of the subcontractor’s performance of work under this Agreement, to the extent allowed and required by law. The recipient shall document in the quarterly report the sub contractor’s progress in performing its work under this agreement. For each subcontract, the Recipient shall provide a written statement to the Department as to whether the subcontractor is a minority vendor as defined in Section 288.703, Fla. Stat. Certification On behalf of my firm, I acknowledge, and agree to perform all of the specifications and grant requirements identified in this solicitation document(s). Vendor/Contractor Name ______________________________ Date __________________ Authorized Signature ___________________________________________________________ Address _____________________________________________________________________ Solicitation/Contract # ____________________________ RPS 18-7432-MP,<<31 of 31>> Florida Transportation of Engineering (FTE)7/22/20 8250 Pascal Drive, Punta Gorda, FL 33950 RPS 18-7432-MP 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.B GRANT CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES Exhibit 1.B – 9 COLLIER COUNTY Acknowledgement of Terms, Conditions, and Grant Clauses Flow Down of Terms and Conditions from the Grant Agreement Subcontracts: If the vendor subcontracts any of the work required under this Agreement, a cop y of the signed subcontract must be available to the Department for review and approval. The vendor agrees to include in the subcontract that (1) the subcontractor is bound by the terms of this Agreement, (ii) the subcontractor is bound by all applicable state and federal laws and regulations, and (iii) the subcontractor shall hold the Department and Recipient harmless against all claims of whatever nature arising out of the subcontractor’s performance of work under this Agreement, to the extent allowed and required by law. The recipient shall document in the quarterly report the sub contractor’s progress in performing its work under this agreement. For each subcontract, the Recipient shall provide a written statement to the Department as to whether the subcontractor is a minority vendor as defined in Section 288.703, Fla. Stat. Certification On behalf of my firm, I acknowledge, and agree to perform all of the specifications and grant requirements identified in this solicitation document(s). Vendor/Contractor Name ______________________________ Date __________________ Authorized Signature ___________________________________________________________ Address _____________________________________________________________________ Solicitation/Contract # ____________________________ RPS 18-7432-MP,<<31 of 31>> Patel, Greene and Associates, LLC 07/21/2020 215 East Main Street, Bartow, FL 33830 RPS 18-7432-MP 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.B GRANT CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES Exhibit 1.B – 9 COLLIER COUNTY Acknowledgement of Terms, Conditions, and Grant Clauses Flow Down of Terms and Conditions from the Grant Agreement Subcontracts: If the vendor subcontracts any of the work required under this Agreement, a cop y of the signed subcontract must be available to the Department for review and approval. The vendor agrees to include in the subcontract that (1) the subcontractor is bound by the terms of this Agreement, (ii) the subcontractor is bound by all applicable state and federal laws and regulations, and (iii) the subcontractor shall hold the Department and Recipient harmless against all claims of whatever nature arising out of the subcontractor’s performance of work under this Agreement, to the extent allowed and required by law. The recipient shall document in the quarterly report the sub contractor’s progress in performing its work under this agreement. For each subcontract, the Recipient shall provide a written statement to the Department as to whether the subcontractor is a minority vendor as defined in Section 288.703, Fla. Stat. Certification On behalf of my firm, I acknowledge, and agree to perform all of the specifications and grant requirements identified in this solicitation document(s). Vendor/Contractor Name ______________________________ Date __________________ Authorized Signature ___________________________________________________________ Address _____________________________________________________________________ Solicitation/Contract # ____________________________ RPS 18-7432-MP,<<31 of 31>> VIBEngineering, Inc.7/24/2020 700 Central Avenue, Suite 302, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 18-7432-MP 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 253Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 254Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 255Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 263Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4Packet Pg. 264Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Tindale Oliver Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library–Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Contract Collier County RPS No. 18-7432-MP August 6, 2020 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) August 6, 2020 Attention: Evelyn Colon, Procurement Specialist Collier County Procurement Services Division 3295 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg C-2 Naples, FL 34112 RE: Solicitation No. 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library for Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Contract Dear Ms. Colon and Selection Committee, We are pleased to submit our proposal for your consideration in selecting a firm to provide the range of services in the Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services category. Stantec brings a variety of fully integrated services across multiple disciplines ready to meet the needs of Collier County and the Collier County MPO. Along with our subconsultants, our proposal brings a team of dedicated professionals and technicians, expertly qualified to deliver exceptional service. Stantec has partnered with Collier County on many projects. We remain committed to assist as the Collier County MPO takes on new and challenging projects, strengthens data driven decision making processes, and brings together robust multimodal programs needed to meet a diversity of tasks. We recognize the Collier County’s drive to build inclusive programs that reach a variety of stakeholders including the current development of the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan, the Collier Area Transit’s Transit Development Plan, and representation on committees. We recognize this work is just beginning and will require a professional approach that builds consensus and works to future-proof against rapidly changing technology and changing demographics, supports a vibrant economic environment, and remains ready to respond to a new operating culture in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Stantec’s approach focuses on a culture of providing exceptional value through a dedicated team. Carmen Monroy, based in our Fort Myers and Naples office, will serve as the project manager and primary point of contact. Carmen brings over 36 years of transportation planning including a strong background in transit, bicycle and pedestrian planning integration, multi-modal safety programs, and state and federal transportation policy planning. Chris Brockmeier, based in our Naples office, will serve as Principal-in-Charge, overseeing customer interactions, quality control, and Stantec’s rigorous quality and safety standards. We look forward to continuing to provide Collier County’s MPO professional services that meet state and federal transportation policy requirements, assist with prioritization and strategic decision making, reflect a vision and place created through multi-modal transportation, and facilitates inclusive plans that are resilient, vibrant and uniquely serve the visitors and residents of Collier County. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Carmen Monroy Chris Brockmeier Project Manager Principal-in-Charge Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Boulevard Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34108 Collier County has a diversity of resources that encompass everything from rural agricultural to cosmopolitan city center to ecological preserve – good planning strengthens each of them. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 1. Project Team 4 Ability of Professional Personnel 4 Organization Chart 14 Resumes 15 2. Past Performance 31 3. Workloads 38 Forms 39 Content 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 4 1. Ability of Professionals Traditionally, transportation planning needs have been addressed by providing more roadway capacity, but a wider range of approaches including Transportation Demand Management and alternative transportation modes, such as high speed transit, micro-mobility, and cycling, need to be considered and integrated into forward-thinking plans. Stantec provides transportation planning services with a holistic approach that considers not only alternative, technical solutions, but the impacts of alternative land use patterns, as well as environmental and community concerns. This approach is complemented by our computer modeling expertise using tools suitable for projects ranging from smaller community and neighborhood transportation plans to large regional plans with major transit components. Using these models, Stantec can easily investigate a wide range of alternatives and effectively present results to stakeholders for their input. From transportation planning studies, intersection analysis, and design through construction and deployment, we help communities harmoniously connect by marrying functionality with form. Our leading transportation specialists are matched with our best planners, landscape architects, and scientists based on the given project’s requirements. Our focused expertise, diverse experience, and collaborative teamwork enable us to create solutions that enhance mobility and improve safety, at the same time, they also enhance the local area and meet the current and future needs of that community. The following pages provide an overview of Stantec’s skills and expertise to address the County’s Core Areas Of Transportation Planning and Core-Specific Task Areas. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 5 CORE AREAS OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING Safety and Security Planning The issues of safety and security are very dominant in today’s world. In addition to the traditional vehicular safety issues that impact us all, public safety related to security is a major concern to most our citizens. Stantec has experts with the awareness and background to assist Collier County in developing safety programs and security response plans for its citizens. Frank Domingo, PE, from his experience as the Sarasota County Engineer, understands the issues of vulnerability of infrastructure and the processes that can be followed to minimize exposure of our infrastructure systems. He is also working with new technologies such as connected infrastructure to further improve safety in the transportation network. Policy Planning Two major issues that impact the development of policy are funding and quality of life/environmental preservation. These are two areas where the Stantec team excels. MPO Policy initiatives will be supported by Howard Glassman, former Executive Director of the Florida Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC) and ten years as a Policy Planning Manager for the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Systems Planning Transportation system planning is the basis for making good ideas a reality, and Stantec has been at the forefront of systems planning in Florida many years. The firm’s work for the FDOT in District 1 is an example of the expertise that Stantec’s planners have in the systems planning arena. They have the full range of requisite skills, from model development and network analysis to long-range plan development. Sub-Area/ Corridor Planning Stantec’s professionals have long been adept in the study of transportation corridors and/or sub-areas to determine transportation deficiencies and the need for improvements. The range of skills required for these services, both quantitative and qualitative, is what sets Stantec apart. Our professionals understand the need to balance the technical work of identifying the best traffic flow with the social needs of blending improvements with the needs of the community, and this has brought Stantec great success. The proposed team understands that a project is an “improvement” only if it is perceived that way by all who are affected. This means that the needs of the traveler who drives through the study area must be balanced against the local users and residents who must face the associated impacts of higher traffic volumes and speeds. The proposed team understands the importance in finding this balance. Trasportation Statistics The quality of the transportation planning that Stantec conducts is directly related to the data available for the analytical tasks that the firm’s professionals must perform. For this reason, Stantec starts its work the highest quality data and thoroughly checks it for completeness and appropriateness. The proposed team will utilize the most appropriate techniques for collecting the data accurately and cost-effectively. Quality Counts will assume a principle role in the collection. Stantec will lead the analysis of transportation data with its traffic engineering and data analytics experts. Transit Planning Public transportation (transit) services, not unlike Intelligent Transportation Services (ITS) and Toll Feasibility Studies, is recognized as a specialized field of transportation. In order to provide the MPO with the best possible services in that field, Stantec expects to provide public transportation-related services through its seasoned transit professionals. Project assignments will be managed locally by Project Manager, Carmen Monroy, while at the same time enabling the Stantec team to bring its extensive set of national resources to each task. Transportation Disadvantaged Planning Stantec expects to provide transportation disadvantaged planning services through its in-house transit professionals. Services will include updating the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Service Plan and providing administrative and technical support as needed. Short and Long Range Planning Stantec team members understand the intricacies of short- and long-range planning programs. The team brings an abundance of first-hand experience and knowledge to the project, covering everything from helping to establish priorities for 5-year work programs to assisting decision-makers with planning decisions formulated to deal with the demands of a 25-year horizon. Understanding how short-term decisions (e.g., land use decision, etc.) affect long-range transportation goals is critical to establishing a sound and effective planning program. The Stantec team has the depth of resources to assist the MPO in all aspects of the planning program. Assistance with various surface transportation plans and programs including highway, transit, transportation disadvantaged, congestion management, pedestrian pathways, and facilities The County’s Pathway Planning Program and Transportation Disadvantaged services, as we know them today, were started in Collier County by the MPO when Jeff Perry, Consultant, was the MPO Director. He organized the original program, formulated and managed the Pathway and TD advisory committees and managed the selection and monitoring of the first TD service providers. Jeff will be available on an on-call basis to assist as needed. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 6 CORE-SPECIFIC TASK AREAS Within this set of core work program areas, there are 36 specific work task areas that relate to potential assignments that could be issued during this contract period. We have provided a brief summary for each scope are to demonstrate our understanding of the task area and to relate relative experience. 1. Community Impact Assessment In the foreword to its Community Impact Assessment Handbook, the USF Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) writes, “Transportation projects can have major social and economic effects — both positive and negative. Analysis of community impacts provides insight into ways projects can be improved or redefined to reduce adverse impacts and increase overall project benefits. Historically, much of the attention in environmental impact assessment has been placed on the natural environment, rather than on how transportation projects affect people and communities.” The Stantec team can offer community impact assessment services to the Collier MPO following the principles for conducting a CIA as documented in publications. 2. Safety and Security Planning This area of the MPO’s practice is evolving every day, from planning for our future infrastructure to identifying critical safety issues in the day-to-day operations of our highway, pathway, and transit facilities. Maintaining the operational integrity, and thus safety, of our system is important in this era of vigilance against threats and terrorism, in addition to natural disasters and pandemics. The MPO needs to be kept current on the latest policy and technical fronts as they may impact our systems. The Stantec team, with its resources of on-the-ground professionals and tenacious researchers, can offer the MPO the resource set needed to support the MPO’s goal of maintaining a safe and secure transportation system. The Stantec team is capable of performing various tasks associated with inventory and evaluation, database development and mapping, and contingency planning as well as remote resources. 3. Preparation of Corridor Studies The in-depth study of corridor segments would include field observations with roadway audit characteristics, inventories, data collection, accident, LOS, travel time, and delay studies to generate a set of viable alternatives to improve safety and performance of the traffic. In addition, the alternative selection process must assess and recommend improvements for access management, travel time, speed, signal progression/platooning, queues, and bandwidth. Stantec and its team of subconsultants can offer the MPO and its partners a complete, cost-effective corridor assessment strategy, from modeling project traffic in various alternatives, through public involvement and participation (a critical and often defining component in a corridor study), to the final corridor evaluation techniques employing on-the-ground and GIS technologies. Stantec and its partners have performed numerous successful studies in Collier County, including the following: • Pine Ridge Road Corridor Congestion Study • Vanderbilt Drive Corridor Study • Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Corridor Study • Davis Boulevard Corridor Study • Santa Barbara Boulevard Extension PEEA • Wilson Boulevard Corridor Study 4. Traffic Modeling Stantec maintains an in-house staff of professionals with FSUTMS travel demand modeling experience suitable to support the day-to-day needs of the MPO and its partners. Stantec supported Collier County in update of the FDOT District 1 Districtwide model to forecast the traffic impacts from the CIGM, Baseline, Mid-Range, and High-Range land use scenarios for the north and south receiving areas. The four land use scenarios were run on the 2040 Alternative 3 Needs Network to evaluate their impacts to the surrounding roadway network. The socioeconomic data for transportation analysis zones (TAZs) representing the north and south receiving areas were modified based on the residential and non-residential projections from Collier County. 5. Traffic Data Collection Services Stantec can provide a full complement of traffic and transportation- related data to the MPO and the County, using in-house resources as well as those of the proposed team’s subconsultants and data collection vendors. Stantec maintains an ongoing contractual relationship with Quality Counts for both traffic data collection. 6. Access Management Studies Access management, when properly implemented, increases the capacity and improves the safety and operations of area roadways. Stantec has participated in a number of access management exercises, handling both analyses and public involvement for projects as well as providing public involvement support for FDOT projects. Local examples include: • Santa Barbara Boulevard Multi-Lane Design — Access Management Analysis Task and Public Involvement Task (Collier 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 7 County) • US 41 Corridor Access Management Plan (CAMP) Public Involvement (FDOT District-wide contract) • SR 10 RRR Design (FDOT District 3) 7. Environmental Data Collection and Analysis Stantec established its Ecological & Water Resources (EWR) team in Southwest Florida more than 20 years ago to assist public and private clients with a variety of projects related to the environment. Stantec’s EWR ecologists, botanists, marine and wildlife biologists, scientists, and technical support professionals currently offer timely, cost-effective services to help clients successfully balance their project needs with environmental regulations. Stantec provides expertise in numerous environmental aspects of the transportation planning process, including environmental resource permitting, corridor impact evaluations, site evaluations (due diligence), environmental impact statements, land management plans, hydric soils determinations, vegetation mapping (FLUCCS), and wetland jurisdictional determinations (state and federal), along with endangered and threatened species surveys, habitat mapping, monitoring, relocation and take permits, and management plans. Stantec EWR Staff provided support to the Collier MPO during the 2040 LRTP Update by developing a methodology to quantify the potential environmental mitigation costs associated with new and expanded roadway corridors. 8. Data Collection and Analysis Services to the MPO can include field data collection and mapping, infrastructure evaluation and analysis, as well as monitoring and reporting services. 9. Traffic Operations Analysis Studies Stantec’s team offers the MPO a complete package of traffic operations analysis tools. From traffic data collection and analysis, to computerized traffic simulations, to design concepts and cost estimates, the firm can provide the MPO with the services it may need. 10. Preparation of Long Range Transportation Plan With the MPO “between LRTP Updates” during the tenure of this contract, the services related to the LRTP will most likely involve minor plan amendment activities. Clearly during this time, the MPO will have an opportunity to reevaluate various LRTP components, test different alternatives, fine tune the SE data forecasts, etc. Stantec can assist the MPO staff with all aspects of the amendment process, including evaluating 3rd party amendments, travel demand modeling/alternatives testing, ETDM screening, CIA review, and public participation, etc. Stantec can assist in all of these tasks. Stantec’s relevant experience relating directly to the preparation of full LRTP Updates and Amendments includes: • Management/Preparation of the Collier MPO 2040 LRTP Update • Preparation of the Collier MPO 2035 LRTP Amendment • Management of the Collier MPO 2035 LRTP Minor Update • Preparation of the Collier County MPO 2025 LRTP Update • Development of Revenue Forecasts (2030, pre- and post- SAFETEA-LU)) • Model development (Yr2000 validation) for the Lee-Collier and Sarasota/Manatee-Charlotte MPOs 2030 LRTP Updates 11. Preparation of Public Participation Plan Updates Stantec brings a depth of local knowledge able to meet the changing communication strategies necessary to engage Collier’s diverse community. Stantec’s approach builds on identifying individual stakeholders, utilizing data and outreach techniques to create flexible, tailored plans that speak to community building. We look for key considerations like high-season participation and owner/renter mix in communities to insure we reach stakeholders. Our approach includes use of various online tools, surveys, assessments, and strategies meant to engage and invite curiosity. The Stantec team is prepared to assist with plan updates that are clear and concise, actionable, and accountable. Stantec can deliver a variety of public participation plans that include Limited English Proficiency Plans, Citizen Advisory Participation Plans, and communication strategies that are COVID-19 responsive, targeted and speak in a coordinated voice. Stantec understand in addition to traditional public engagement needs, Collier County works collaboratively and respectfully with the Seminole Tribe of Florida and the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida. Stantec brings an understanding of government-to- government processes between state and federal agencies, and how to respectfully approach consultation and engagement. 12. Freight Planning Stantec is prepared to develop plans, assessments and recommendations that capture inbound and outbound freight and coordinate and connect across modes, including maritime, aviation, rail and truck. We recognize the work undertaken by the MPOAC Freight Advisory Committee and the FDOT’s Freight Coordinators, and present a team that has participated in those 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 8 efforts, building knowledge, and preparing for the continued growth in Florida and in national freight volumes. Recent events have highlighted the importance of supply chain integration and the role of freight. Further, FHWA estimates freight volumes to grow by more than 60% in the next 25 years. Preparing for this growth and its impact on safety, air quality and space needs, as well as the potential technology impacts of truck platooning is at the core of good planning. Stantec brings data, forecasting and solid planning to keep the Collier MPO at the forefront of freight planning. 13. Regional Planning Traffic, environmental impacts, physical and economic issues, water management, and citizens do not see political boundaries when facing challenges. As population grows, citizens are increasingly traveling across counties and districts to access jobs, services, entertainment, shopping, and education. Resources and attractions become shared. Regional planning provides an opportunity to participation in the development of plans, integrated resource management, policy considerations and visioning. Stantec brings knowledge of regional planning councils, state policy planning, and participation in statewide task forces that will help the Collier MPO continue to have a voice in those initiatives. The Stantec team, with firsthand knowledge of regional planning, can help with data and analysis as well as agency coordination. 14. Preparation of Annual Report Collier County’s mission to deliver high-quality and best-value public services, programs, and facilities to meet the needs of its residents, visitors, and businesses today and tomorrow resonate throughout the Collier MPO’s work. It also aligns strategically with the MPO’s work in data-based decision making, performance reporting, tracking, reporting, and planning. Stantec understands how the Collier County’s MPO’s work in improving safety, maintaining infrastructure, managing congestion, improving the efficiency, reliability and resiliency of the transportation network aligns and support local governments. Our team and our fully integrated services can assist with not just reporting, but connecting plans, visions, and initiatives for which the Collier MPO can serve as a catalyst. 15. Level of Service Analysis Stantec has the capabilities to conduct levels of service analysis as part of LRTP updates/amendments, corridor studies, design/ project traffic studies, and traffic impact studies for the MPO and other government organizations. Stantec has provided continuing LOS analysis services to Collier County, including: • 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Report (Transportation Component) • Pine Ridge Road Corridor Congestion Study Stantec has deployed the latest tools (software and methodological) available to its traffic engineers throughout Southwest Florida and stays up-to-date with the latest FDOT- sponsored quality of level of service training and guidance. 16. Long Range Transportation Planning to Include Modeling Assistance Stantec understands this to be a broad description of services that, in addition to modeling assistance, could cover a variety of potential services that the proposed team may be asked to provide, including administrative support, technical assistance with the development of annually produced documents (e.g. the UPWP and TIP), and more. This could also involve services related to the MPO’s involvement in the ETDM process and special studies that the MPO may wish to undertake from time to time. Having direct MPO program management experience, Stantec’s staff brings a thorough understanding of the UPWP and TIP development processes. Establishing a planning work program to meet the federal and state requirements is paramount. Likewise, establishing a set of funding priorities and championing those priorities during the FDOT’s “gaming” process (5-Year Work Program Development) is crucial. Understanding the intricacies of the various funding opportunities and the decision-making process, as well as having a sound understanding of the approval process, are some of the advantages Stantec can bring to the MPO. The proposed team can provided timely assistance to the MPO staff in policy and system areas such matters as: • ITS Support Services • GIS Technical Support Services • Land Use/Socioeconomic Data Forecasting • District 1 Regional Planning Model (D1RPM) Support Services • Scope of Services Development • Proposal Evaluations • FHWA and FDOT Regulations • MPOAC Liaison • Local Government Liaison • Lee MPO (and Technical Committees) Liaison 17. Mapping and Graphics Production One of the specialized services that Stantec provides to a number of local agencies — currently including general service contracts with the Collier County Transportation and Utility Divisions, the City of Naples, and the Collier County School District — is that of Geographic Information Services (GIS). Stantec’s existing inventory 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 9 of traffic, land use, and environmental data is second to none in this region. Stantec has the capability to collect, compile, analyze, and report traffic, land use, survey, and environmental data. Stantec’s Geographic Information System (GIS) professionals use state of the art hardware and software to assimilate and report a variety of data in visual format that fosters greater understanding of complex data and issues. Stantec’s mapping and business graphic resources are available to serve the MPO as needed. These include mapping and business graphics production such as brochures, fliers, direct mailings, etc. Complete production services, whether routine or specialized, are being offered by the Stantec team. Previous work for the MPO includes: • Collier MPO GIS Technical Support – Update of the Comprehensive Pathways Plan Map • Collier MPO GIS Support Services - TDSP Update 18. Preparation of Powerpoint and Video Presentations Stantec understands how powerful communication skills can help convey complex topics. Using visual aids, PowerPoint presentations and video can help an audience see, as well as hear information. With MPOs, our team has come to understand that presentations that provide updates, speak to project details and request feedback are often developed and then screened through various committees. It is not unusual to have a presentation presented to the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee, then the Technical Advisory Committee and the Citizen Advisory Committee with a final presentation to the full board and then posted on the website. Stantec understands how presentations need to transcend an audience, support the public record and speak to a variety of stakeholders on important issues. Many times, the Stantec team prepares presentations with annotated agendas and key facts to aid staff presenting. We understand the need to support the Collier MPO’s work, with no just visuals – but the full support and preparation to make meaningful presentations. 19. Transit Planning The Collier MPO provides resource support to the local transit agency, Collier Area Transit, which is responsible for the operations of the CAT service in Collier County. Long-range transit planning has now become an integral part of the multi-modal transportation planning process, with the simultaneous development of both highway and transit systems in the 2040 LRTP Update managed by Stantec for the MPO. The development of Transit Needs and Cost Feasible Plans needs were done in close cooperation with the local transit agency. Stantec can offer the services of its team of public transportation professionals from around the country to bring fresh perspectives to the delivery of transit services when performing any of the tasks the MPO undertakes in the coming years. 20. Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities Planning and Design Multi-modal transportation planning in Collier County took a giant leap forward with the advent of the first bicycle/pedestrian planning program initiated by Mr. Perry when he was director of the MPO. Walking and biking in Florida is a way of life for some, and a casual pastime for many. We see the MPO’s role of integrating the bike/walk mode into the transit and highway modes as a primary objective, one that requires a significant effort in both planning and decision-backed priority programming. Stantec has the resources on both the planning and design side to provide support to the comprehensive pathway program to the MPO. We have successfully developed pathway systems in both the public and private settings and have provided a host of pathway services to local State and Federal agencies. In addition to the local Stantec resources and those of our strategic partners, Stantec has nationally recognized resources that can be made available to the MPO to satisfy the non-motorized planning responsibilities of the agency, whether it is preparing complete master plan updates, maintaining the GIS inventory of facilities, or performing constructability/affordability reviews of projects proposed by partner agencies. 21. Congestion Management Analysis During this contract period, one program area that deserves attention is the CMS/ITS Program. Stantec can assist the MPO in a review and evaluation of the adopted Congestion Management Process (CMP). Services would potentially include working closely with MPO staff and committees (e.g., CMS/ITS Stakeholders Committee, TAC, CAC, PAC, etc.) to identify congested facilities, identify performance improvement strategies and to assist in the prioritization and ranking of potential improvements. Monitoring and evaluating current conditions can also be included as part of the services being provided. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 10 22. Transportation Safety Planning, Data Gathering and Analysis Safety remains a top priority and a key decision driver. We are uncompromising in our commitment to actively bringing safety to the forefront of discussions. Certain aspects of safety call for evaluation of data points in order to understand how best to address issues, how to prioritize multiple needs and how give context to safety planning tools. Stantec’s team is led by staff with experience in the development and implementation of statewide safety performance measures, chaired the statewide bicycle pedestrian partnership council, and was a member of numerous safety campaigns to align contextual analysis, data, modeling and road safety audits. Together with data analytics, GIS and engineering, Stantec brings a coordinated and cross-discipline approach, to build opportunities where safety drives the conversation to improvements. 23. Support Staff at Public Meetings Stantec offers the MPO a variety of staff services, including technical, logistical, clerical, management, and graphics support and will serve as an extension of the MPO staff, as needed. This support may be needed “in the background” to help facilitate meetings and functions (e.g., workshops, special events, etc.) or as direct technical back-up support prior to, during, and after public meetings. Stantec staff can review the work of others and provide comments to MPO staff prior to public meetings. The firm’s staff can prepare “white papers” on policy issues (e.g., regulator or statutory changes) or technical issues (e.g., the merits/drawbacks of bi-MPO models). Stantec can also provide staff resources to attend and monitor other public meetings. Stantec can provide the appropriate team resources from all its partners, as needed to support and complete task-specific assignments in all relevant disciplines. 24. Public Involvement Assistance Including Website Development, Newsletter Production, and Other Educational and Informational Materials Stantec also brings a thorough understanding of the components of a successful public involvement plan. Stantec offers the MPO relevant experience from an impressive list of previous County, MPO, and FDOT projects, including: • Collier MPO 2040 LRTP Update • Collier MPO 2035 LRTP Minor Update • US 41 Corridor Access management Plan (CAMP) – Public Involvement Task (FDOT) • Santa Barbara Boulevard Multi-Lane Design - Public Involvement Task (Collier County) • Wilson Boulevard Extension Corridor Study (Private/Collier County) • Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension – Public Involvement Task (Collier County) • Vanderbilt Drive Corridor Study – Study and Public Involvement Task (Collier County) • Collier MPO Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) 2025 Update (Collier MPO) Stantec will work with the MPO staff to develop a public involvement strategy that incorporates Socio-Cultural Effects and Title VI compliance, one that is consistent with the MPO’s adopted Public Involvement Plan. The Stantec team offers unique public involvement expertise including: Newsletters and/or Brochures – Stantec has proven experience in developing newsletters and brochures that translate complex technological information into easily understood language. Public Workshops and Community Group Meetings – Stantec can develop a “Public Meeting Site Inventory” of a variety of meeting locations throughout Collier County. Website Development – Stantec can assist in the development and management of the MPO’s Web site in conjunction with the County’s Web site development consultant. 25. Develop Project Information, Including Community Impacts, Including Input into the Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) Process Stantec’s approach to providing ETDM support services to the MPO and its partners is unique. Currently, Stantec has professional ecological staff serving as an on-site consultant to the FDOT. Our team member, Renaissance Planning Group currently holds an ETDM District-Wide Services Contract with FDOT District 1. The Stantec Team’s professionals are intimately familiar with, and directly involved in, natural resource programs, research, and ongoing environmental issues handled by the State Environmental Management Office (SEMO), including listed species issues, NPDES stormwater program, wildlife crossing projects, wetland and upland mitigation, and the Environmental Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) process. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 11 26. Evaluate Potential Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) Applications Enacted as part of major Growth Management legislation during the 2005 Legislative Session (SB 360), the Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) was created to encourage regional planning by providing state matching funds for improvements to regionally significant transportation facilities identified and prioritized by regional partners. As a “partner,” the MPO will need to participate in a continuing process of identifying, planning and prioritizing regional projects. Stantec can provide any administrative and technical support the MPO may need to participate in this process. The Stantec team can provide the MPO with the technical expertise it will need to effectively and equitably evaluate any proposed projects. The team can offer review, comparative analysis, and recommendations based upon the criteria established. 27. Review of Project Development & Environment Studies From time to time, the FDOT will conduct PD&E studies of projects in Collier County, a process that may take several years to complete, depending upon the size and scope of the project. While fashioned as a technical process in the FDOT PD&E manual, there is a significant public involvement component requirement that allows for continual cooperation with local agencies (and the public). Since the PD&E process is often the “kick-off” of a high- priority MPO project, it is critical that the MPO stay plugged in to the process. While there are frequent “public” opportunities to obtain information and provide input, the MPO also enjoys a more direct connection to the FDOT and therefore its PD&E consultants. The Stantec team of planning, engineering, and research professionals has the experience and expertise to monitor the PD&E process on behalf of the MPO, providing formal reviews of documents and studies and offering guidance and technical assistance, as may be needed. 28. Developing Project Cost Estimates Often during the planning process, it is important to understand both present day costs and future costs in order to properly evaluate the potential programming and funding options that may be available to the MPO. Planning level cost estimates, being much different than construction cost estimates, need to consider a variety of factors that may change over time, some of which may correspond directly (or indirectly) to funding/revenue streams, while others are completely independent of revenue influences. Stantec understands the process, has performed that evaluation of costs as well as revenues for the FDOT and for the MPOs in the District, and would be in a position to offer that expertise to the MPO as part of this contract.The Stantec team can provide both planning-level as well as design-level project cost estimates. 29. Provide Administrative Support to the MPO From time to time, the MPO may find itself in need of temporary administrative support services. Workloads are frequently cyclical, with peaks and valleys, and during peak times. Staff can be provided as needed to handle administrative functions under the direct supervision of the MPO staff. 30. Transportation Disadvantaged Planning The services being provided today serve as an integral part of the area’s overall public transportation system. Stantec can provide management oversight services, TD planning services, committee management services, and public involvement services as may be needed. Stantec can prepare major or minor updates to the Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan. 31. Project Management Oversight During times of budget and staffing imitations, it may be prudent for the MPO staff to contract for Project Management Services, thus relieving the staff to support other administrative priorities. The Stantec team has a seasoned group of project managers that can be assigned to assist the MPO on any manner of planning project, including scope development, project management oversight and peer review, status report writing and review, and direct project management services. Stantec professionals are available “on-call” to help support the administrative and technical needs of the staff. 32. GIS Services Stantec has a fully developed geographic information systems (GIS) team performing extraordinary work in visualization and mapping with tools that do more than just paint a picture. Our GIS team takes charts, graphs, and maps to create data driven multidimensional analysis that aid decision making. Our Stantec team works from spatial and geographical patters to map critical information. Often our team also leverages other data to create scenarios, project future conditions and patterns and layer areas of interest to fully inform suitability and capability. Visual representations of data can frame discussion and illuminate impacts. Stantec is prepared to bring GIS analysis to a variety of tasks and show, not just tell the whole story – from the ground up. 33. Reporting, Analysis, and Planning related to Automated, Connected, Automomous Vehicles and Ride-Hailing Services Throughout this proposal, Stantec has highlighted the role of technology as a driver, fast-paced and rapidly changing. Our Stantec team is fully engaged. At the state level, several pilot projects are underway, planning, designing, and deploying CAV 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 12 projects. These initiatives are critical as issues of policies and governance, funding for pilots and decisions on implementation platforms move forward quickly. Stantec brings subject matter experts including Carmen Monroy, who at the state level participated in the development of FDOT’s strategic business approach to ACES, integrated ACES policy in the state long range plan, and developed guidance for the MPOAC compliance with federal expectations. This work experience most importantly supports Stantec’s core group of cross-functional disciplines dedicated to smart mobility and future proofing. Stantec’s Smart Mobility team brings data, technology, multi-modal services to create ideas, concepts and plans that link safety, efficiency, and transportation. 34. Reporting, Analysis, Mapping and Planning related to Climate Change, Sea Level RIse, Coastal Resiliency, Extreme Weather Phenomena, and Transportation Infrastructure Resiliency As a fully integrated team, Stantec brings a variety of resources to assist with reporting, analysis, mapping, and planning of coastal resiliency practices to coastal communities. The Stantec team approach strengthens public engagement, building conversations and consensus around fact-based analysis and state and federal agency coordination. With a variety of technical expertise, we build on tools including scenario planning and methodological approaches to provide a framework. Partnering with agencies already working to understand the ecology of coastal wetlands, flood and storm mitigation, water sheet fall, assessing vulnerable habitats, and imperiled species to provide data points helps better plan for the future. They also provide an opportunity conduct risk assessments for improved decision making, rebounding from black swan events, and developing natural cost-effective solutions. As a global company, Stantec brings world-wide concepts. In 2020, Stantec was named one of the Corporate Knights’ 2020 Global Most Sustainable Corporations in the World. This annual ranking acknowledges companies that implement responsible business practices based on environmental, social and governance indicators. We are proud of this designation and how it represents our commitment the communities we serve. 35. Analysis and Reporting on Socio-Economic Data, Trends, and Travel Behavior Stantec brings a variety of resources and partnerships that not only collect socio-economic data but use a variety of tools to provide the necessary analysis to understand activities, trends, and impacts. Our team can speak to aggregate and disaggregate data, census cross sections, transportation, and infrastructure bringing deep analysis and reports. More importantly our team can help the Collier MPO identify trends and test assessments. We can use historical data to measure and assess the impact of improvements, policy decisions, and develop forecasts. Looking at various indicators and tracking populations can provide context for decision making. Stantec recognizes the importance placed on travel behavior studies for the Collier MPO. Travel behavior studies can be critical in understanding and meeting multi-modal objectives, coordinating and planning of transit services, and necessary for understanding patterns of impacts. Understanding the interdependence between modes and life-oriented behaviors becomes a driver. At Stantec, we have performed a variety of travel behavior studies. We are ready to design studies that bring social, cultural, personal, and other factors together to provide the insight necessary to develop action plans, strategies and investments based on need. 36. Origin/Destination Studies A variety of techniques, data, and information is available to study origin and destination studies. These techniques range from complex, layered data points to simple hand counts. Stantec understands the importance of selecting the right tool for the job. Stantec’s approach to O-D studies commences with understanding the client’s needs. Whether developing long-range plans, assessing travel time reliability or mapping traffic patterns, Stantec understands the approach begins with understanding our client’s needs, developing thoughtful and precise methodology, developing controls and quality checks, and then executing the study. The use of cellular, GPS, and Bluetooth technologies for O-D studies have allowed us to better understand external trip types, commercial and non-commercial vehicle categories, and supplemental attributes such as preferred routing with different geographic classes such as urban, regional, and statewide scales. Stantec brings a variety of tools and is ready to take on these studies. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 13 Stantec brings global resources to our local community. Our local Naples office is also home to our key staff. Collier County is where we live, work and play. Our communities are fundamental. Whether around the corner or across the globe, they provide a foundation, a sense of place and of belonging. That’s why at Stantec, we always design with community in mind. Stantec is a fully integrated company with practices in Coastal Flood Risk Reduction and Restoration, Coastal and Marine Energy Resilience. We work across all industries to deliver environmental expertise and proudly named #4 Market Segment in Environmental Science by Engineering News Record. Our governments services support defense, infrastructure, security, and health care. Our Smart Cities practice spans more than technology, sensors, networks, data, and the Internet of Things. Our Smart Cities practice sees how technology can help deliver services more efficiently, future-proof assets, boost transparency, making cities and citizens more vibrant, healthy, and resilient. Together, these and other practices support our work in transportation that is multi-modal, facilitating and advancing the movement of people and goods, connecting communities and preparing for a vision of a community that is unique to Collier. Stantec has been named one of Corporate Knights’ 2020 Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations in the World. The annual ranking acknowledges companies that implement responsible business practices based on environmental, social and governance indicators. Global 100 companies represent the top 1% in the world on sustainability performance. Our most important differentiator is our people. Stantec brings a team of dedicated professionals, technicians, and subject matter experts ready to connect with the Collier MPO and meet the needs of the Collier County, its residents and visitors. Why Stantec? 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 14 Cella Molnar & Associates, Inc. (DBE), established in 1996, provides professional consulting services in all aspects of public involvement, project management, event planning and coordination, transportation planning, and construction engineering inspection to prime consultants and governmental agencies in Southwest Florida. Over the past ten years, Cella Molnar & Associates, Inc. has conducted over 120 successful public involvement and outreach programs for transportation projects using skills to evaluate a community prior to public involvement activities and determine what unique cultural or political issues will need to be addressed in the public involvement program. Marlin Engineering, Inc. (DBE) provides expertise and services in all areas related to freight and logistics. Their team of planners, professional engineers and technicians well understand that the movement of freight in South Florida is as important as moving people. MARLIN prides itself in supporting freight projects from feasibility studies to post-design services for more than two decades and having the vision to understand its importance to the community. Quality Counts, LLC provides comprehensive transportation data collection services using the latest technology for surveying and product delivery. Quality Counts is dedicated to on-time, responsive customer service. Quality Counts specializes in non-intrusive data collection solutions, including video and radar based devices, from various locations nationwide. Data collection for this contract will be provided by staffing in the Quality Counts Tampa office. RWA Enginneering has offices located in Naples and Fort Myers and bring a team of professionals with decades of experience working on local projects and a strong commitment to the local communities in which their employees reside. In recent years, RWA has completed comprehensive planning projects in Collier, Lee, Hendry, and Charlotte counties, all of which necessitated extensive data collection, analysis, GIS mapping, and public involvement. Gannett Fleming has been delivering transportation solutions since 1915. From policy and corridor studies to long range transportation plans, Gannett Fleming considers how various transportation modes interact, how technology provides better traveler information, and how non-motorized modes, such as bicycling and walking, become convenient travel modes. They implement the efficient analysis of changes in transportation systems and development patterns into our creative approaches and solutions that meet technical, operational, and financial goals. Our Subconsultants 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 15 Team Organization Project Management Team Safety and Security Planning Short and Long Range Planning Systems Planning Transit & Bicycle/Pedestrian Planning Transportation Disadvantaged Planning MPO Policy Planning Sub-Area/Corridor Studies Origin/Destination Studies Socio-Economic Data GIS Development and Technical Support Transportation Statistics Public InvolvementResiliency Frank Domingo, PE Mike Rutkowski, PE AICP Chris Benitez, PE Matt Crim, PE PTOE Chris Benitez, PE Jeff Perry, AICP Jamie Snow Chris Benitez, PE Heejo Ham, PhD Jeff Perry, AICP Mike Rutkowski, PE AICP Frank Domingo, PE Graeme Masterton Patrick Vanasse. AICP Frank Domingo, PE Graeme Masterton Michelle Orfield Jeff Perry, AICP Carmen Monroy Jeff Perry, AICP Howard Glassman Matt Crim, PE PTOE Silvia Beltre, PE Jamie Snow Jeff Perry, AICP Sumeet Kishnani, PE, PTOE Matt Crim, PE PTOE Cynthia Albright, FAICP, GISP Manny Perez, GISP Richard Pascoe, GISP Matt Crim, PE PTOE Glenn Davis Jared Beck, AICP Veronica Paredes Kris Cella Matt Starr, PG (Coastal and Sea Level Rise) Caroline Cunningham, AICP, CFM, ABCP (Hazard Mitigation) Katie LaBarr, AICP (Sustainability) Autonomous Vehicles/Ride Hailing Services Enviromental Data Collection/ Analysis Freight Planning Frank Domingo, PE Joel Mann, AICP Michelle Orfield Ashley Thompson Tom Trettis, CSE, PWS Jeffrey Weidner Carmen Monroy Contract/Project Manager Chris Brockmeier, PE Principal-in-Charge Stantec Consultant/Subject Matter Expert CellaMolnar Gannett Fleming Marlin Engineering Quality Counts RWA Engineering 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 16 Carmen Monroy | Project Manager For this engagement, Carmen Monroy will serve as Project Manager, bringing a renewed focus on transportation planning and land use. In addition to a strong background in policy planning, Carmen has a background in inclusive housing, senior housing, CDBG and SHIP grants as well as city planning. Carmen served as executive director of a neighborhood rehab corporation in Lee County, overseeing the agency’s development of Cape Coral’s only senior housing at the time. She served as a gubernatorial appointment to the State of Florida Affordable Housing Study Commission and testified before the State Housing Finance Corporation to incentivize and prioritize housing with access to transit services. Carmen went on to serve as Financial Business Manager for Lee County transit, leading the successful award of over $40 million in state and federal discretionary grants, development of a new transit facility and key park and ride facilities. Carmen developed LeeTran’s Limited English Proficiency Plan, Title VI plan and led the triennial review process. Carmen went on to serve as the FDOT District One Director of the SW Area Office in Fort Myers and Director of the Office of Policy Planning. As Director of Policy Planning, Carmen led statewide community planning for FDOT, led statewide Florida Transportation Plan – the state’s long-range plan, oversaw the statewide metropolitan plan, including the state’s public involvement policy. In addition to Carmen’s experience in seaports, transit, statewide policy planning and land use, Carmen has completed extensive project manager training. As an ISO9000, Stantec’s project managers undergo rigorous training in safety and quality control. Carmen Monroy, as project manager will serve as the primary contact, coordinating consultant services, managing account services and ensuring our highest standards of accountability and excellence are maintained. Expertise of Designated Staff Stantec is proud of our relationship with the Collier County MPO. Our previous team lead, Jeff Perry remains available to assist and lead projects initiated under his work with the MPO as shown in the staffing chart. His knowledge and expertise will continue to assist and leverage other Stantec resources to ensure seamless transitions and highlight new opportunities that bring innovation and creativity. Chris Brockmeier, PE | Principal-in-Charge Chris is the Naples Office leader and has 30 years of industry experience as a civil and environmental engineer for private and public sector clients. His skills include project management, conceptual and final design, permitting, system modeling, cost estimating, bidding, and construction-phase services. With an eye on the overall organization and coordination of work, Chris will make sure adequate staff is available to execute each task order under this new General Planning Services contract. Francisco Domingo, PE | Transportation Planning/Smart Mobility Frank is an experienced transportation planning manager with communication skills that will provide effective interaction with stakeholders. He will provide valuable knowledge of the policies and procedures involved in the planning process as well as comprehensive infrastructure, transportation planning, and development expertise. As the Mobility Solutions Team Lead, Frank assembles a multimodal, multidisciplinary AV Shuttle Deployment Team by connecting the passion and diverse technical know-how within Stantec with new resources in this growing field. He expands Stantec’s commitment to enhancing mobility for seniors and persons with disabilities through assistive technology, universal design, and accessible services. Frank applies Stantec’s expertise in public-private- nonprofit partnerships to bring smart mobility solutions to new and existing clients. Jeffory Perry, AICP | Consultant/Subject Matter Expert Jeff has recently retired from Stantec, but will serve as a consultant and provide his expertise to the diverse work efforts authorized under this contract. He is an experienced MPO Director with past performance as project manager on GPC contracts in District 1, Collier County, and Lee County. As a former MPO Director, Jeff understands what is needed from a consultant team and what issues are most important to the client. Jeff has over 40 years of experience in transportation planning. He was the first executive director of the Collier County MPO. Jeff understands the Federal and State requirements for Long Range Transportation Plans (LRTPs), having managed their production and adoption. He has managed the Collier MPO 2040 LRTP Update including development of goals and objectives, project selection criteria, public involvement services, visioning, and socioeconomic data development. He provided finance plan development, travel demand modeling, and public involvement for the needs assessment and development of a cost feasible plan. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 17 Carmen Monroy Contract/Project Manager Carmen brings 36 years of planning experience to her position as senior transportation planner and analyst in Southwest Florida. Her career has taken her from local city planning efforts managing grant compliance and city, state, and federal affordable housing programs to FDOT Director of Policy Planning. As Director, she provided oversight for the planning and development of public policy areas including management of the Metropolitan Planning Program, Florida’s Strategic Intermodal Systems Policy Plan, and the Florida Transportation Plan. Education • Business Analytics, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, 2020 • Master of Public Administration, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, Florida, 2009 • Bachelor, Human Resources Management, Barry University, Miami Springs, Florida, 1995 Relevant Experience • FDOT Rural Planning Process* | Statewide, Florida, United States | Project Manager • Fort Myers Beach Transit Study* | City of Fort Myers Beach, Florida, United States | Transportation Planner • I-75 Relief Task Force* | Statewide, Florida | Task Force Liaison • Heartland Regional Transportation Planning Organization* | DeSoto, Glades, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands & Okeechobee Counties, Florida • Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council* | Statewide, Florida • Florida Department of Transportation, Director, Office of Policy Planning* | Tallahassee, Florida | Director • Florida Department of Transportation, Southwest Area Office Director* | Fort Myers, Florida | Regional Manager • Cape Coral Housing Rehab Corporation* | Cape Coral, Florida | Executive Director • Community Development Building Grant (CDBG) State Housing Incentives Program (SHIP)* | Cape Coral, Florida • LeeTran Operations, Administration, and Maintenance Facility* | Fort Myers, Florida, United States | Planner • LeeTran Grant Program* | Lee County, Florida, United States | Grant Writer “Planning is the careful allocation of resources. Good planning is an investment in the future.” 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 18 Chris Brockmeier PE Principal-in-Charge Chris has both civil and environmental engineering experience in the private and public sectors. His professional skills include project management, preliminary/ conceptual design, permitting, system modeling, final design, cost estimating, bidding, and construction-phase services. He participated in the design and implementation of various stormwater, potable water, sanitary sewer systems and solid waste facilities, which included permitting from federal, state, and local regulatory agencies. Registration • Registered Engineer #56859, Florida Board of Professional Engineers Education • Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 1995 Relevant Experience • Lake Okeechobee Scenic Trail / Taylor Creek Waterway Analysis | Okeechobee County, Florida | Principal-in-Charge • Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail | Monroe County, Florida | Principal-In-Charge • East Naples Community Park | Collier county, Florida | Engineer • Wakulla County Board of County Commissioners, Spring Creek Highway Roadway Improvements* | Wakulla County, Florida | Project Manager • US 319 Alternative Corridor Study | Wakulla County, Florida | Principal-In-Charge • SR 85 Improvements (SR 397 to SR 85 North) | Okaloosa County, Florida | Lead Engineer • Paul Russell Road Sidewalk Improvements | Leon County, Florida | Principal-In-Charge • Lake Henrietta Trailhead Development Services | Leon County, Florida | Lead Engineer • Glenview Drive Sidewalk Improvements | Leon County, Florida | Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager • Eastgate Way/Bedford Way Sidewalk Improvements | Leon County, Florida | Principal-In-Charge • Dempsey Mayo Sidewalk Improvements | Leon County, Florida | Principal-In-Charge • Buck Lake, Pedrick and Walden Roads Sidewalk Improvements | Leon County, Florida | Principal-In-Charge Frank Domingo PE Transportation Planning/Smart Mobility Frank brings comprehensive infrastructure, transportation planning, and development expertise to his projects. His professional background encompasses project management, conceptual planning, feasibility analysis, roadway design, right-of-way acquisition, permitting, community relations, developer agreement negotiations, and construction contracts. Frank offers his clients valuable knowledge of the policies and procedures involved in the planning process to facilitate successful public-private partnerships. Registration • Professional Engineer #51601, State of Florida Education • FDOT, Advanced Work Zone, Traffic Control, 2017 • Florida Engineering Leadership Institute, FICE, Graduate, 2012 • Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 1986 Relevant Experience • Automated Shuttle Feasibility Study and Concept Plan | Chamblee, Georgia | Transportation Engineer • Self-Driving Shuttle Concept Plan, Pinellas County, Florida | Transportation Engineer • Sarasota-Manatee Barrier Island Traffic Study | Sarasota County, Florida | Project Manager • Pine Ridge Road Corridor Congestion Study | Collier County, Florida | Principal in Charge • Honore/17th and McIntosh/Ashton Intersection Analysis & Concept Development, Sarasota County, Florida | Principal in Charge • Bay Street Extension Corridor Study | Sarasota County, Florida | Project Manager • DeSoto Future Comprehensive Plan Update | DeSoto County, Florida | Transportation Engineer • Central Sarasota Parkway - I-75 Interchange PD&E Study & Final Design | Sarasota County, Florida | Project Manager • Hillsborough County MPO Congestion Management Program | Tampa/Hillsborough County MPO, Florida | Transportation Engineer • Westshore to Crystal River/Inverness Transit Corridor Study | Hillsborough to Citrus Counties, Florida | Transportation Engineer 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 19 Mike Rutkowski PE AICP Transportation Planning Mike offers specialized experience in sustainable transportation solutions and Complete Streets integration. He is experienced in all aspects of transportation planning and engineering including leading numerous multi-modal corridor studies, comprehensive transportation plans, and bicycle -pedestrian plans in the U.S. His expertise includes corridor concept designs and access management, stormwater designs, multimodal crash and safety studies, Complete Streets projects, multiuse trail design, and policy development. Mike is a Board Member on the National Complete Streets Coalition and a certified Complete Streets Trainer for the Smart Growth America. Registration • Certified Planner #134824, American Institute of Certified Planners • Professional Engineer #20734, State of North Carolina Education • Master of Science, Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 1998 • Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, 1990 Relevant Experience • Lake Charles Metropolitan Transportation Plan | Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana | Project Manager • Whiskey Road Complete Streets Corridor Study | Aiken, South Carolina | Project Manger • Rochester Bikeway Design Projects | Rochester, Minnesota • Charleston Area 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan | Charleston, South Carolina | Project Manager • North Carolina Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan* | Multiple Locations, North Carolina | Task Manager • Lee County Community Transportation Service Plan (CTSP)* | Lee County, North Carolina | Project Manager • Spartanburg Area Transportation Study MPO: Long-Range Trenaportation Plan | Spartanburg, South Carolina | Project Manager • Jacksonville Transit Development Plan* | Jacksonville, North Carolina | Task Manager • Morrisville Transit Oriented Design (TOD) Small Area Plan | Morrisville , North Carolina | Complete Streets Lead • UNC Greensboro Bicycle and Pedestrian and Mobility Safety* | Greensboro, North Carolina | Task Manager Chris Benitez PE Traffic Engineering Chris has 13 years of experience as a transportation engineer working on several types of projects including Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Studies, traffic and safety engineering, interchange and expressway planning and design, transit planning, multimodal/complete street projects, public involvement, in-house consulting, training and presentations, and managing task order/on-call contracts. He has worked on projects for the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization (TPO), Broward Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX), South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA), and local governments within South Florida. Registration • Road Safety Professional #323, Transportation Professional Certification Board Inc., 2019 • Certified Professional Traffic Operations Engineer #4286, Transportation Professional Certification Board Inc. • Professional Engineer #74035, State of Florida Education • Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Florida International University, Miami Beach, Florida, 2006 Relevant Experience • Doral Central Park Traffic Study | City of Doral, Florida | Lead Traffic Engineer • Traffic Flow Modification Study at Stillwater Drive and 79 Street, City of Miami Beach, Florida | City of Miami Beach, Florida | Project Manager • Safety Analysis Report for the PD&E Study along I-95 between Stirling Road and Oakland Park Boulevard (9 miles), FDOT District 4 | Florida • Safety Analysis for Sawgrass Express Lanes Direct Connect to/ from I-75 Feasibility Study | Sunrise, Florida | Task Manager • Traffic Impact Study for Suncoast Community Church Rezone and Special Exception | Sarasota, Florida | Task Manager • Work Zone Traffic Analysis for Mobile River Bridge Design/ Build | Mobile, Alabama | Task Manager 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 20 Jeff Perry AICP Consultant/Subject Matter Expert Jeff brings expertise in both public and private sector transportation planning and private sector land use planning and zoning. His credentials include several public sector management positions where he directed metropolitan transportation planning programs. He also has extensive experience in land use and growth management practices and is qualified as an expert witness in land use and growth management plans. Registration • Certified Planner #9614, American Institute of Certified Planners Education • Associate of Arts, Edison State College, Fort Myers, Florida, 1970 Relevant Experience • MPO General Services Planning Consultant | Lee County, Florida | Project Manager • FDOT, District 1 Transportation Systems Planning Services Contract #C8710 | District-wide, Florida | Project Manager • Collier County Growth Management Plan - Traffic Circulation, Mass Transit, and Aviation Elements* | Collier County, Florida | Project Manager and Senior Transportation Planner • Collier MPO 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan Major Update Phase III | Collier County, Florida | Project Manager • Collier MPO Freight & Congestion Strategies | Collier County, Florida | Project Manager • Collier MPO General Services Planning Consultant | Collier County, Florida | Transportation Planner • Collier MPO Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Update Support | Collier County, Florida | Project Manager • Pine Ridge Road Corridor Congestion Study | Collier County, Florida | Project Manager and Principal Planner • Collier MPO General Services Planning Consultant | Collier County, Florida | Transportation Planner • Whippoorwill Road Interconnection Traffic Study | Collier County, Florida | Project Manager and Principal Planner • Corkscrew Road - Puente Lane Traffic Signal Design Traffic Report | Village of Estero, Florida | Principal Planner Matt Crim PE PTOE Traffic Engineering Matt has both private and public sector experience in transportation planning/engineering. His technical experience includes arterial and intersection level-of-service analyses, signal timing optimization, signal preemption studies, signal warrant analyses, corridor studies, traffic impact analyses, micro and macro traffic modeling, long-range transportation planning/ modeling, land use analyses, access management, traffic calming measures, and parking analyses. Registration • Certified Planner #9614, American Institute of Certified Planners • Advanced Work Zone Traffic Control, Department of Transportation, Florida, 2018 Education • Certified Professional Traffic Operations Engineer #3067, Institute of Transportation Engineers • Professional Engineer #68297, State of Florida Relevant Experience • Pine Ridge Road Corridor Congestion Study | Collier County, Florida | Traffic Engineer • Queuing Study for Delnor-Wiggins Pass State Park | Collier County, Florida | Traffic Engineer • Whippoorwill Road Interconnection Traffic Study | Collier County, Florida | Traffic Engineer • Honore Avenue Phases I-V (S.R. 681 to Palmer Ranch Parkway) | Sarasota County, Florida | Traffic Engineer • Roundabout, Honore Avenue at Central Sarasota Parkway | Sarasota, Florida | 2017 | Traffic Engineer • Hogan Island Quarry Ecological, Surveying & Permitting Services | Collier County, Florida | Traffic Engineer • Buck Lake, Pedrick and Walden Roads Sidewalk Improvements | Leon County, Florida | Project Engineer 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 21 Jamie Snow Systems Planning Jamie has over 25 years of experience in engineering with governmental agencies. She has coordinated and managed several multimillion dollar transportation projects for various clients; including scheduling, budgeting, and team interaction. She has worked on travel demand forecasting for concurrent projects; both highway and transit, and created training documentation to provide training for forecasting efforts. Her experience includes long range transportation plans, traffic impact studies, corridor planning studies, travel time delay studies, signal warrant analyses, and high accident location studies. Registration Engineer-In-Training #A-15198, State of North Carolina Education • Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, 1994 Relevant Experience • Orlando International Airport (OIA) Connector Refresh Alternatives Analysis* • Volusia County Transit Connector* • Morgantown MPO Long Range Transportation Plan Update* • Atlanta Regional Commission, Georgia SR 20 Corridor Study* • FDOT D5 I-4 Beyond the Ultimate Multi-Resolution Modeling (MRM)* • Lake County, FL Round Lake Road PD&E Study • Miami-Dade Expressway Authority SR 836/Dolphin Expressway Southwest Extension Project Development and Environment Study • FDOT District 5 I-95 Interchange at Pioneer Trail PD&E Study • FDOT D5 CFRPM Action Item Plan* | Traffic Demand Modeling • FDOT D5 CFRPM Applications Improvement Plan* | Traffic Demand Modeling • FDOT D5 CFRPM Interstate Access Plan* | Traffic Demand Modeling Heejoo Ham PhD Systems Planning Dr. Ham has over 25 years of consulting experience in the field of transportation planning and engineering. Dr. Ham developed an integrated freight demand model as part of his doctoral research sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). His expertise in transportation planning includes a special emphasis in the development, debugging, validation, calibration, and application of macroscopic and mesoscopic travel demand models; micro-simulation modeling; dynamic traffic assignment; origin-destination matrix estimation; land use modeling; air quality modeling; and preparation of travel demand forecasts for highway and transit corridor studies. Education • Ph.D., Transportation Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, 2001 • M.P., Transportation Planning, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, 1990 • Bachelors, Economics, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea, 1987 Relevant Experience • Florida DOT Intelligent Transportation Systems Evaluation Tool (Phase II)* | Statewide, Florida • Florida DOT Port Everglades Cube Avenue Mesoscopic Simulation Mode* | Statewide and Fort Lauderdale, Florida • Florida DOT Conversion of TeleAtlas Shape Layer to Cube Network* | Statewide, Florida • Florida DOT Dynamic Traffic Assignment – Toll Managed Lane Modeling* | Statewide, Florida • Florida DOT Development of Dynamic Traffic Assignment to Support Traffic Impact Assessments* | Fort Lauderdale, Florida • Florida DOT Air Quality Post Processor (AQPP) Tool* | Statewide, Florida • SR 934/79th & 81st Street Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study, FDOT District 6 | Miami, Florida • SR 836 West Extension Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) | Miami-Dade County, Florida 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 22 Graeme Masterton Transit Planning Over his career Graeme has developed expertise in all aspects of transit planning (both bus and rail) and delivery as well as project and program management in small town and rural systems, medium size transit agencies as well as large transit organizations. Urban influences, land use opportunities and constraints, road network challenges, passenger behaviour, and the desire to create innovative and cost-efficient transit networks that function for the passenger and the operator have been Graeme’s focus for the past 26 years. Education • B.A. (Urban and Economic Geography), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, 1988 • M.A. (Community and Regional Planning), University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, 1994 Relevant Experience • Linking Tahoe Multi-Modal Transportation Master Plan | Lake Tahoe, California | Project Manager • Comprehensive Review of Edmonton Transit | Edmonton, Alberta | Project Manager • Access Transit (TransLink)* | Transit Planner • Southeast LRT Feasibility Review* | Project Manager • BC Transit Operational Review Program* | Transit Planner • Transit Effectiveness Program* | Transportation Planner • NW LRT and South LRT Extensions* | Calgary, Alberta | Senior Planner • National Football League Super Bowl 50 Operational Audit | Transit Lead • Atlanta Braves Spring Training Stadium Event Operations Plan | Venice, Florida | Event Operations Transport Planner Michelle Orfield Transportation Disadvantaged Planning As part of the Smart Mobility and Transit Planning team, Michelle provides guidance and leadership for clients regarding self-driving vehicles, connected technology, shared mobility, and on-demand transit solutions. Her diverse portfolio also includes transit efficiency reviews, long term strategic plans, LRT/BRT corridor analysis, and systems integration with new services. She has designed regional commuter systems that only require a few buses, collaborated on projects in large urban cities with several hundred vehicles, and everything in-between. Her in-depth knowledge of the day to day tasks and complexities required to smoothly operate transit systems enables her to create processes and plans that are realistic, technically feasible and have support from all stakeholders. Education • Certificate in Next Generation Transportation Planning, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, 2015 • Bachelor of Arts, Urban Planning and Policy, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, 2005 • Master of Public Administration, Public Policy, Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, 2009 Relevant Experience • Greater Bridgeport Transit Master Plan and TOD Review | Bridgeport, Connecticut • System Redesign* | Chilliwack, British Columbia • Multi-City Service Expansion* | Des Moines, Iowa • Downtown Circulator Alternatives Analysis* | Des Moines, Iowa • Transit Riders Advisory Committee* | Des Moines, Iowa • SMART Transit* | British Columbia • Inter-Municipal Funding Model* | Fraser Valley, British Columbia • Self-Driving Shuttle Implementation at Assembly Yards | Doraville, Georgia | Project Manager • Self-Driving Shuttle Concept Plan | Florida | Project Manager 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 23 Patrick Vanasse AICP Bicycle/Pedestrian Planning Patrick has more than 20 years of professional planning experience in Florida. He has worked on a wide variety of planning projects including: transportation initiatives, development and redevelopment, comprehensive planning, zoning, community plans, and environmental projects. He has a solid understanding of the planning process and embraces the opportunity to integrate transportation, growth management and urban design in order to develop vibrant communities and to improve quality of life. Registration • Certified Planner #19432, American Institute of Certified Planners Education • Masters in Environmental Studies, Urban and Regional Planning, York University, Toronto Ontario, 2001 • Bachelor of Arts, Economics, Concordia University, Montreal Quebec, 1994 • Diplome D’Etude, Collegiale Commerce, John Abbott College, Montreal Quebec, 1991 Relevant Experience • 2012 Comprehensive Pathways Plan | Collier MPO | Collier County, Florida | Project Manager • Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan | Lee County MPO | Lee County, Florida | Project Manager • Bayview and Lunar Pedestrian/Streetscape Improvements | Bayshore Beautification MSTU | Collier County, Florida | Project Manager • Bonita Springs Trail Feasibility Study | Bonita Springs , Florida | Project Manager • Immokalee Walkable Community Study | Collier MPO, Collier County, Florida | Project Manager • Immokalee Public Realm Plan | Collier County, Florida | Project Manager • Sombrero Beach PD&E Study | FDOT District 6 | Monroe County, Florida | Public Involvement • Lower Matecumbe PD&E Study | FDOT District 6 | Monroe County, Florida | Public Involvement Howard Glassman MPO Policy Planning Howard is Director of Planning Services and responsible for developing goals, vision, objectives, and performance measures and analyzes various state and regional ITS master plans. Prior to Gannett Fleming, Howard spent twenty years as Executive Director of the Florida Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC) and ten years as a Policy Planning Manager for the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Education • BA, Political Science and Economics, Long Island University, 1970 • MA, Urban Studies, Southern Connecticut State University, 1973 • MS, Community Planning and Area Development, University of Rhode Island, 1976 Relevant Experience • MPO Program Management Handbook, FDOT. Developed the December 2018 update to the MPO Program Management Handbook used by the FDOT Central Office, FDOT District Offices and MPOs to prepare the various MPO related documents and reports that are required by federal and state law. • Florida Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC), Tallahassee, FL. Executive Director responsible for representing Florida’s 27 MPOs by establishing relationships with partner organizations and public and private stakeholders; serving as the principal lobbyist for all MPO advocacy activities with the Florida Legislature, Governor’s Office, and state and federal agencies; serving as the project manager for an MPOAC Transportation Revenue Study; conducting governing board, staff directors’, and policy/technical committee meetings; developing technical documents and reports; and developing and organizing the MPOAC training institute. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 24 Silvia Beltre PE Sub-Area/Corridor Studies Silvia has over 25 years of experience and has been Project Manager, Engineer of Record and Senior Project Engineer on several Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Studies, Transportation Planning Studies, as well as highway and bridge final design projects. She is currently assisting FDOT apply for the Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program (NEPA Assignment). She has also participated in numerous trainings and certifications including her coursework in Urban Transportation Planning which included: travel demand forecasting, trip generation, trip distribution, transit planning, mode split, traffic assignment and land use issues. She has also been involved in and has experienced with the design of signing and marking, lighting, and signalization. Registration • Professional Engineer #51295, State of Florida Education • Bachelor of Science in Architectural Engineering - Cum Laude, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, 1992 • Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering - Cum Laude, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, 1992 Relevant Experience • Port of Palm Beach Corridor Study, Riviera Beach, FDOT District 4 | Deputy Project Manager • Trafficways Improvement Study, Medley, Florida* • Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study for SR 836 Southwest Extension from NW 137th Avenue to SW 136th Street | Miami-Dade County, Florida | Project Manager • Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study for the Widening of the Sawgrass Expressway from South of Sunrise Boulevard to South of US-441, Broward County, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise; SEIR | Broward County, Florida | QA/QC Officer • SW 10th Street Corridor Feasibility Study from the Sawgrass Expressway to I-95, Broward County, FDOT District 4 | Broward County, FL, USA | Project Manager/Engineer of Record • Oakes Road Planning Level Analysis Study, Davie, Florida, Town of Davie* • NW South River Drive Feasibility Study, Medley, Florida, Town of Medley* Sumeet Kishnani PE PTOE LEED AP Origin/Destination Studies Sumeet has over 17 years of experience that he has gained while working on a variety of transportation engineering and planning projects. He has extensive experience in transportation planning, pedestrian and transit analyses and vehicular traffic capacity analyses. He also has specialized skills in planning for major events, which include simulation modeling for both vehicles and pedestrians. Sumeet’s experience has included project management and principal engineering roles during traffic impact studies for large private development projects, master plans and stadium operations plans. Registration • Certified Professional Traffic Operations Engineer #2390, Transportation Professional Certification Board Inc., 2008 • Professional Engineer #117663, Texas Board of Professional Engineers Education • M.E, Civil Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, 2002 • B.E., Civil Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, 2000 Relevant Experience • Sarasota-Manatee Barrier Islands Study | Sarasota, Florida | Event Operations Task Lead • Queens Plaza Reconfiguration* | Queens, New York • City of Bethlehem Parking Plan* | Bethlehem, Pennsylvania • Moynihan Station Redevelopment* | New York, New York • Newark Penn Station Developments* | New York, New York • Redevelopment of a Confidential Site in Lower Manhattan* | New York • Emergency Evacuation Modeling for the Department of Homeland Security* • Pittsburgh Steelers Game Day Operations Plan* | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania • Meadowlands Sports Complex Operations During Construction* | East Rutherford, New Jersey • Philadelphia Sports Complex Transportation* | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania • Giants/Jets Stadium Transportation Master Plan | East Rutherford, New Jersey 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 25 Cynthia Albright FAICP GISP Socio-Economic Data With 30 years of experience, she works on a wide range of projects with public, private, and nonprofit organizations. She specializes in using location-based data to develop information- based transportation and mobility plans, community plans, sustainability plans, growth management plans, site development, and urban revitalization. At the root of her planning endeavors is an integration of technology, data, and a knowledge of planning and urban design. Registration • Certified Geographic Information Systems Professional (GISP) #91203, GIS Certification Institute • Certified Planner #013987, American Institute of Certified Planners • Certified Urban Designer #35, American Institute of Certified Planners Education • MA in Architecture and Urban Planning, University of California, Los Angeles, California, 1987 • BA in Liberal Studies, California State University, Northridge, California, 1984 Relevant Experience • City of Reno Downtown Revitalization Plan | Reno, Nevada • RTC Bike Share Feasibility Study | Reno, Nevada | Project Manager • Virginia Street Corridor Transit Alternatives Analysis | Reno, Nevada | Planner • Lake Tahoe Multi-Modal Transportation Master Plan | Lake Tahoe, California | Principal author • City of Sparks, Future Service Area Facility and Infrastructure Master Plan | Sparks, Nevada | Urban Planner • Mill Street Interceptor Capacity Analysis and Master Plan | Reno, Nevada, US | Principal Planner • City of Sparks Comprehensive Infrastructure Facility Master Plan | Sparks, Nevada | Principal Planner • City of Reno, Stead Sewer Interceptor Capacity Analysis | Reno, Nevada | Task Manager • Preliminary Engineer’s Report in Support of Tax Increment Financing Area, Copper Canyon Commerce & Technology Park | Sparks, Nevada | Principal Planner Manny Perez GISP GIS Development and Technical Support Manuel has over 11 years of GIS experience providing technical project management and task delivery. His skills include geodatabase design, data conversion, manipulation, collection and maintenance, as well as technical writing and providing technical specifications. Manuel provides Enterprise GIS solution design and implementation, including GIS Servers, enterprise geodatabase platforms, and web map application support. He has extensive experience working with diverse project teams on large-scale technical projects. He offers extensive knowledge of GIS technology as applied to land use planning, water resources, land development and utility networks, and can provide training and support to end users. Registration • Certified Geographic Information Systems Professional (GISP) #67934, GIS Certification Institute, 2015/06/24 Education • Bachelor of Arts, Geography, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, 2009 Relevant Experience • Collier County GIS Asset Editing | Naples, Florida | GIS Manager • City of Tamarac Enterprise GIS Upgrade | Tamarac, Florida, United States | Project Implementor • Enterprise GIS Support | Venice, Florida | Enterprise GIS Consultant • GIS Web Map Application Solution | Collier County, Florida | GIS Analyst • Enterprise Asset Management | Collier County, Florida | Senior GIS Analyst • Historical Aerial Acquisition and Georeferencing* | Multiple Sites, Florida | GIS Analyst Intern • GIS Database Design and Data Management | City of Bradenton, Florida | GIS Specialist • Planning and Community Development | City of Bradenton, Florida | GIS Specialist 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 26 Richard Pascoe GISP GIS Development and Technical Support Richard is a Transportation Planning Project Manager with 15 years of planning, GIS, and project management experience with various local, state, and federal agencies. Most of his background lies in the transportation sector, providing technical services for long-rage transportation planning, public transportation planning, autonomous vehicle studies, land use planning, environmental studies, and asset management. Richard’s technical skills include travel demand modeling, origin-destination analysis, comprehensive planning, traffic planning, computer programming, database development, cartography, and GIS implementation. Registration • Geographic Information Systems Professional #00060828, Geographic Information Systems Certification Institute, Tampa, Florida, 2010 Education • Masters of Arts, Geography, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, 2008 • Bachelors of Fine Arts, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, 2001 Relevant Experience • Sarasota-Manatee Barrier Island Traffic Study • Miami-Dade MPO Freight Maps* • Automated Shuttle Feasibility Study & Concept Plan | Chamblee, Georgia, USA • Comprehensive Freight Improvement Database* • Crash Data Management Systems (CDMS)* • Shared Autonomous Vehicle Study • Statewide Work Program Data Model and Viewer* • Park & Ride Facility Reporting • Freight Roadway Design Considerations* • SR 54 R/W Mapping* • Bus Stop Inventory and ADA Accessibility Study* • Regional Public Transportation Data Model* Glenn Davis Transportation Statistics Glenn is directly involved with all of QC’s projects for the Florida offices and oversees all operations for the Florida market. This role includes experience in estimating, organizing, managing, and delivering all manner of projects for QC. Glenn has managed numerous contracts including aggregate annual tube counts of more than 500 locations. In addition, he has managed several specialized projects where new approaches and dynamic methods were developed in order to complete tasks, specifically using video technology for TMC’s and non-intrusive radar units for traffic monitoring. Certifications • FDOT Traffic Control • Traffic Signal Technician Education Bachelor of Science, Business Management, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida Relevant Experience • Districtwide OD and Travel Time Studies | FDOT District 1 | Project Manager • Tampa Heights Complete Streets Study | FDOT District 7 | Project Manager • County-Wide Synchro Model Update | Sarasota County | Project Manager • Corrine Dr Corridor Study | MetroPlan Orlando | Project Manager • Sawgrass Mills Area Traffic Study | Broward County | Project Manager • Glades Road Interchange PD&E Study | FDOT District 4 | Project Manager • US 98 Design and PD&E Re-evaluation | FDOT District 1 | Project Manager • SR 739 Design and PD&E Re-Evaluation FDOT District 1 | Project Manager • I-95 Interchange PD&E Study | Palm Beach County | FDOT District 4 | Project Manager 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 27 Matt Starr PG Resiliency (Coastal) Matthew has 17 years of project management and technical experience in coastal engineering, dredging, beach renourishment, port and marine facilities, coastal structures, hydrographic surveying, ecosystem restoration, asset management, natural resource mapping, water quality, and wildlife biology. Matthew has been responsible for all phases of project delivery including local, state, and federal permitting, design services, construction plans, contract documents/ bidding, contractor procurement, and CEI services. Registration • Professional Geologist #2906, State of Florida Education • Bachelor of Science, Marine Science/Coastal Geology, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, South Carolina, 2006 Relevant Experience • Clam Pass Circulation Study, Management Plan, and Water Quality Study* | Collier County, Florida | Lead Coastal Scientist • Peer Review Services for Naples Beach Nourishment Design | Collier County, Florida | Project Manager • Bird Colony Island Living Shoreline and Wave Attenuation System* | Sarasota County, Florida | Project Manager • Alligator Bend Shoreline Protection and Resiliency Project* | New Orleans, Louisiana | Project Manager • FWC Navigation Improvement and Maintenance Program* | Statewide, Florida • FWC Collier County Marker Repairs* | Naples, Florida • Port Canaveral Shoreline Stabilization* | Cape Canaveral, Florida | Project Manager • Prime Hook National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) Flood Protection and Marsh Rehabilitation* | Milton, Delaware Jeffrey Weidner Freight Planning Mr. Weidner is responsible for managing the firm’s multimodal disciplines and expansion of policy planning, growth management and economic development disciplines across the state of Florida. Mr. Weidner serves as the Chief Planner for multimodal and safety projects including Vision Zero, freight, seaport, intermodal, transit, transportation demand management, pedestrian/bicycle and complete streets. He also includes state-of-the-art practices in studies recommendations including Transportation Network Companies (TNCs), motorized and Non-Motorized Vehicle sharing and Autonomous/Connected vehicles and uses the latest Data and Analytics tools for cost saving analyses. Education • MS Planning, Urban & Regional Planning, Transportation , Florida State University, 1981 • BS Government, Minor-Computer Science, Florida State University, 1983 Relevant Experience • Martin County Freight and Goods Movement Plan | Martin MPO | Project Manager • Bluetooth Advanced Freight Mobility Systems | FDOT Central Office | Project Manager • Doral Area Freight Plan | FDOT District 6 | Project Manager • 2017/2018 Miami-Dade County 2045 Freight Plan Update | Miami-Dade TPO | Project Manager • Statewide Seaport Origin/Destination Study | FDOT Central Office | Deputy Project Manager • Martin County Railroad Grade Separation Study | Martin MPO | Project Manager • SR 80 Corridor Action Plan - SR 80 from US 27 to I-95 | FDOT District 4 | Project Manager (Freight, Transit, Pedestrian/ Bicycle, and Complete Streets Technical Support) • US 27 Freight Rail Corridor Study | FDOT Liaison | Strategic Development Manager 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 28 Caroline Cunningham AICP CFM ABCP Resiliency (Hazard Mitigation and Sea Level Rise) Caroline serves as Stantec’s lead for hazard mitigation services; she is also a certified professional planner, floodplain manager, Hazus-MH Practitioner, and business continuity planner. With nearly a decade of experience, she has contributed to plans and risk assessment efforts at the local, regional, state, U.S. Territory, tribal, and university levels. Caroline has assisted clients in obtaining federal grants, developing mitigation strategies, facilitating meetings, and conducting outreach to the public. She is a FEMA-authorized hazard mitigation planning and Hazus-MH instructor, exemplifying her knowledge in the field. In addition, she brings experience in a range of disaster- related services, including pre- and post-disaster grant assistance, disaster recovery planning, climate adaptation planning, and community rating system (CRS) support. Registration • Associate Business Continuity Professional (ABCP) #35268, Disaster Recovery Institute International (DRI) • Certified Planner #218388, American Institute of Certified Planners • Certified Floodplain Manager #NC-12-0448, Association of State Floodplain Managers Education • Master of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 2009 • Bachelor of Science, magna cum laude, Environmental and Natural Resource Planning, Economic Policy Concentration, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, 2007 Relevant Experience • Amtrak Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment of the Northeast Corridor | Multiple Locations, Multiple States • National Disaster Resilience Competition (NDRC) Assistance | Nationwide • Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Mitigation Planning | Multiple Locations, Multiple States | Project Manager or Technical Lead • Alachua County, Florida Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan* • Florida Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan Pilot Project* | Manatee County, Florida | Lead Planner Katie LaBarr AICP Resiliency (Sustainability) Katie’s career has included experience in state and local government, as well as private sector planning. She has used her education and experience to promote sustainable community development, with a focus on community resiliency. Katie’s current responsibilities include serving as the lead planner on large residential and mixed use projects assisting with development agreement negotiations, preparing Notice of Proposed Change applications for Developments of Regional Impact (DRI), and rezone and site plan applications for moderate scale residential developments. Registration Certified Planner #023432, American Institute of Certified Planners Education • Master of Science, Planning, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 2005 • Master of Public Administration with Certificate in Emergency Management, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 2005 • Bachelor of Arts, Political Science, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, 2003 Relevant Experience • National Disaster Resilience Competition (NDRC) Assistance | Commonwealth of Puerto Rico • Emergency Management Planning* | Manatee County, Florida | Hazard Mitigation Planner • Emergency Planning and Preparedness* | Manatee County, Florida | Principal Planner • Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program* | Tallahassee, Florida | Intern • Public Sector Planning* | Manatee County, Florida | Principal Planner • Babcock Ranch Community Development of Regional Impact | Charlotte County, Florida | Project Planner 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 29 Jared Beck AICP Public Involvement Jared’s many years of experience as an urban planner and community leader enable his broad perspective and hands on approach to successfully build and manage robust public engagement programs. From advocacy to information, or policy and planning to development and construction, he has worked with numerous communities and clients in developing programs specific to their needs and desired outcomes. Registration • Certified Planner #027911, American Institute of Certified Planners Education • Bachelor of Science, Landscape Architecture, Texas Tech University, Texas, 2000 Relevant Experience • Collier County Stormwater Utility Program | Collier County, Florida, United States | Public Engagement • City of Bonita Springs Stormwater Utility Program | Bonita Springs, Florida, United States | Public Engagement • Bimini Basin Mooring Field Public Engagement Program | Cape Coral, Florida, United States | Project Manager • Collier County One-Cent Sales Surtax Public Information Campaign | Naples, Florida, United States | Project Planner/ Facilitator • Naples Vision Plan Assessment | Naples, Florida, United States | Public Engagement • Old US 41 Redevelopment | Bonita Springs, Florida, United States | Project Planner • Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard Redevelopment Area Expansion & Plan Update | Fort Myers, Florida, United States | Project Manager • Collier County Library Community-Wide Assessment and Long Range Master Plan | Collier County, Florida, United States | Project Planner Veronica Paredes Public Involvement Veronica has over 15 years of experience in the areas of graphics design, illustration concept development, public information and technical editing. She has served as a Technical Editor, Records Coordinator, and Assistant Public Information Officer on several projects from Planning, PD&E through Design and Construction. She also has provided creative services for several Public Involvement projects for FDOT ranging from the design and preparation of direct-mail brochures, project fact sheets, newsletters, PowerPoint presentations, publications, workshop presentation graphics and signage. She has also provided GIS support service including GIS map data exploration and analysis, visualization of real-world features, obtaining information, and communicating that information to others. Education • GIS Training, ESRI, Coral Gables, Florida, 2014 • Public Involvement Training, Florida Department of Transportation, Miami, FL, 2015 • Records Management Policy Training, Stantec, Coral Gables, Florida, 2014 • Bachelor of Science - Interior Design, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 2010 Relevant Experience • Florida Department of Transportation Office of Environmental Management (OEM) | Florida • District Wide Contract Task Work Order – Public Involvement Newsletter, FDOT District 4 | Florida • Districtwide PD&E Consultant, FDOT District 4 | Florida • Districtwide Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Consultant, Contracts No. 1 & 2 – Public Involvement Guidelines, FDOT District 4 | Florida • Miracle Mile and Giralda Avenue Streetscape Improvements | Coral Gables, Florida • Widening of the Homestead Extension of the Florida Turnpike (HEFT) from SW 40th Street Canal to SR 836, Miami-Dade County, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise. | Florida • Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study for SR 9 / I-95 From south of SR 870 / Commercial Boulevard to north of Cypress Creek Road, FDOT District 4 | Florida • Widening of the Sawgrass Expressway (SR 869) from South of Sunrise Boulevard to South of US 441 (SR 7) | Florida 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 30 Kris Cella Public Involvement Ms. Cella is uniquely qualified in developing and implementing very successful, comprehensive large-scale public involvement programs during planning, design, and construction phases for infrastructure projects. Ms. Cella’s expertise in conducting public involvement programs is successfully used to gain acceptance of new projects from affected individuals and special interest groups. Projects have ranged from new developments to facility expansion programs to large-scale transportation projects. Education • B.A., Geography (emphasis in regional land development), University of Arizona, 1979 Relevant Experience • Collier County Long Range Transportation Plan 2030 Update | Collier County, Florida | Public Information Manager • Golden Gate Design/Build Phase 1 and 2 | Collier County, Florida | Public Information Manager • US 41 & SR/CR 951 Project Development and Environment Study Reevaluation | Collier County, Florida | Public Information Manager • Naples Lakes Improvement Project | City of Naples, Florida | Public Information Manager • City of Naples Stormwater Master Plan Updated | City of Naples, Florida | Public Information Manager • US 41 & SR/CR 951 Project Development and Environment Study Reevaluation | Collier County, Florida | Public Information Manager • US 41 Project Development and Environment Study | Collier County, Florida | Public Information Manager • Jolley Bridge, Marco Island | Collier County, Florida | Public Information Officer • Alternate Transportation in Parks and Public Lands (ATPPL) – LeeTran, City of Sanibel, J.N. “Ding” Darling National Wildlife Refuge | Lee County, Florida | Public Involvement Task Manager • I-75 Project Development and Environment Studies | Lee and Collier Counties, Florida | Public Involvement Task Manager • US 41 from Corkscrew Road to San Carlos Boulevard 41 | Lee County, Florida | Public Information Officer Joel Mann AICP Autonomous Vehicles/Ride Hailing Services Joel is a planner with 16 years of experience in transportation planning and transportation-focused contributions to development codes, comprehensive plans, and community master plans. His career pursuits have grown from an intersection of personal passions and commitments, including bicycle and pedestrian mobility, streets as vital urban public spaces, and use of public resources to provide the best possible returns for citizens and their quality of life. He works to develop plans that promote balanced multimodal transportation, that enhance potential for land development and urban design, and that fit within community expectations. Registration • Certified Planner #021420, American Institute of Certified Planners Education • Master of Regional Planning, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 2003 • Bachelor of Arts, New College of Florida, Sarasota, Florida, 2001 Relevant Experience • Connect Atlanta Plan and Atlanta’s Transportation Plan* | Atlanta, Georgia • Livable Claiborne Communities Plan* | New Orleans, Louisiana • US 278 Complete Street* | Avondale Estates, Georgia • Mount Vernon Square Transportation Study* | Washington D.C. • A1A Greenway Opportunities Study* | Fort Lauderdale, Florida • Greater Downtown Savannah Parking and Mobility Study* | Savannah, Georgia • Downtown Alpharetta Parking Study | Alpharetta, Georgia • North Prince George’s County Transportation Action Plan | College Park, Maryland • Downtown Chattanooga Parking Study | Chattanooga, Tennessee 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 31 Ashley Thompson Autonomous Vehicles/Ride Hailing Services Ashley is a smart mobility specialist who uses her training and education as an urban designer to create context specific solutions for innovative, vibrant communities. Her project experience includes detailed comprehensive plans, small area plans, large-scale vision plans, and corridor studies, as well as, projects involving connected technology and automated shuttles. She enjoys the collaborative process of designing alongside transportation planners, engineers, designers, and the public. Education • Master of Urban Design, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, 2015 • Bachelor of Architecture, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, 2013 Relevant Experience • Self-Driving Shuttle Feasibility Study and Concept Plan | Chamblee, Georgia | Smart Mobility Specialist • New Haven Self-Driving Shuttle Concept Plan and Application to the State | New Haven, Connecticut | Smart Mobility Specialist • Self-Driving Shuttle Concept Plan | Tempe, Arizona | Smart Mobility Specialist • Self-Driving Shuttle Concept Plan | Okotoks, Alberta | Smart Mobility Specialist • Self-Driving Shuttle Concept Plan | Clearwater and Dunedin, Florida | Smart Mobility Specialist • Lenox Road Scoping Study | Atlanta, Georgia • Whiskey Road Complete Streets Corridor Study | Aiken, South Carolina • Downtown Memphis Master Plan | Memphis, Tennessee | Urban Designer • South End Vision Plan | Charlotte, North Carolina, United States of America | Urban Designer Tom Trettis CWS PWS Environmental Data Collection/Analysis Tom has 30 years of experience providing project management; local, state, and federal permitting; state and federal wetland mitigation design and mitigation monitoring; state and federal wetland jurisdictional determinations; listed species surveys, wildlife management plans, and habitat restoration plans; and groundwater well monitoring for land development projects throughout Florida. Registration • Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent #GTA-09-00076, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission • Certified Senior Ecologist, Ecological Society of America • Professional Wetland Scientist, Society of Wetland Scientists • Advanced Open Water Diver, Professional Association of Diving Instructors Education • Bachelor of Arts, Environmental Studies, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, 1990 • Associate of Arts, Environmental Studies, Edison State College, Fort Myers, Florida, 1988 Relevant Experience • Interstate 75 Widening from North of SR80 to South of SR78 Design Build | Lee County, Florida | Ecologist • Roadside Animal Detection System (RADS) along U.S. 41 within Big Cypress National Preserve – Wildlife Usage Study | Collier County, Florida | Ecologist • Interstate 95-Listed Species Surveys, Wetland Delineations and Wetland Seasonal High-Water Demarcations | Brevard County, Florida | Ecologist • Northwest Regional Water Reclamation Facility | Hillsborough County, Florida | Ecologist • Galt Preserve | Lee County, Florida | Ecologist • Golden Gate Boulevard Widening Project | Collier County, Florida | Project Ecologist • Treviso Bay | County Collier, Florida | Project Ecologist 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 32 2. Past Performance Pine Ridge Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier County, Florida Pine Ridge Road (CR-896) between US 41 and Collier Boulevard serves as one of only four major east/west arterial corridors serving commuters, providing a direct connection to one of four I-75 interchanges within the urban area. High peak-period traffic volumes experience excessive delay along the entire length of the corridor from US 41 to I-75. This segment is identified as LOS “F,” failing, in the County’s 2016 and 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIRs). Collier County’s Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management Division retained Stantec to evaluate existing and future traffic conditions and to identify potential improvements within the corridor that would relieve congestion and improve the LOS. During the course of the planning study, Stantec prepared and analyzed a future traffic forecast, and potential improvements were developed and evaluated. The “conventional” improvements that would add the capacity needed to relieve future congestion and achieve the adopted LOS standard included increasing the number of through lanes on Pine Ridge Road from 6 to 8 lanes from west of Livingston Road to east of Napa Boulevard, and adding additional left turn lanes at the intersections. Recognizing that the “capacity deficiencies” being forecast primarily occur at the intersections within the corridor, Stantec identified and evaluated three potential “innovative intersection” improvements for the Pine Ridge Road/Livingston Road intersection including a partial- Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI), a Jug-Handle (JH) or quadrant intersection, and Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) or overpass/underpass. Stantec’s professionals have long been adept in the study of transportation needs along highway and transit corridors, and within sub-areas. Serving cities, counties, MPOs, and state agencies, Stantec’s wide range of skills related to these services, both quantitative and qualitative, set the firm apart. Following is a brief description of the team’s most relevant experience. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 33 To provide additional connectivity for the residents of Palmer Ranch South, the developer was interested in constructing approximately a1.1 miles of Bay Street from the existing western terminus of Bay Street east to Honore Avenue, which runs north-south through the Plamer Ranch South 900-acre parcel. The improvements were anticipated to be two traffic lanes, median, bicycle lanes, sidewalksm curb and gutter, stormwater management, utility corridor, a box culvert over South Creek, a crossing over the Legacy Trail, and intersection improvements. Stantec was asked to prepare a Preliminary Design Report that included the study of the transportation integrated networks, specifically the bicycle and pedestrian networks interaction with Legacy Trail, Osprey Junction Trailhead Park, and adjacent future developments. Concept plans were developed for alignment selection. Level of service and operational analysis at the intersection of Bay Street/ Honore Avenue were performed to determine the intersection traffic control design. Ultimately, a roundabout was selected based upon economic and engineering alternatives analysis, level of service, life cycle costing, multimodal compatibility and complete streets (speed reduction for corridor). The traffic analysis included data collection, field review, interpretation of data using both SYNCHRO and HCS software. Projected design traffic volumes were developed using the adopted Long-Range Transportation Planning Model (Cube Voyager Software). Bay Street Extension Corridor Study Sarasota County, Florida Whippoorwill Lane/Marbella Lakes Drive Interconnection Collier County, Florida Collier County encourages interconnectivity and has made advances with local road connectivity with successes such as Tree Farm/Massey/Woodcrest Roads, and Wolfe/Predestine Roads, and the new Kraft Road interconnection between Whippoorwill Lane and the Marquesa Plaza shopping center. These interconnections provide neighborhoods with alternative routes and offer adjacent land uses the opportunities to travel to nearby destinations without having to use the arterial network. The planning team, made up of County Staff and Stantec staff, developed a process that would include preliminary public engagement with stakeholder leadership to identify issues/concerns, identification of countermeasures to address the issues/concerns, Concept Plan design development, public engagement with affected stakeholders, and recommendations to the County. Through the HOA leadership discussions, the team identified the core issues/ concerns including increased traffic, speeding, noise, safety, and correspondingly developed a set of countermeasures that would help mitigate those concerns to the maximum extent practical. Stantec provided technical analysis and public involvement support to the Transportation Planning Department. Services included schematic/conceptual design, traffic calming design, and public involvement activities. Project unanimously approved by local elected officials. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 34 Lake Charles Metropolitan Transportation Plan Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana The Lake Charles Metropolitan Planning Organization (LCMPO) area in Calcasieu Parish has experienced significant growth over the past 12 years while meeting challenges from adverse effects on infrastructure and the economy. Following Hurricane Rita in 2005, the economy and population suffered with locals deciding to permanently move away from the area. Since then, the area has rebounded and is postured for continued growth in the future. While cities and towns continue to expand in the region, the existing infrastructure in the area has not progressed as quickly. Stantec developed a Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) for the LCMPO as well as a separate analysis and documentation for the non-metropolitan area of the Calcasieu Parish region. These Plans reflect the needs and priorities for multimodal transportation as informed and directed by the citizens, organizations, and elected officials of the Lake Charles region. The LCMPO 2045 MTP is a financially and fiscally constrained transportation plan that complies with Federal Regulations such as the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st, Century Act (MAP-21), and the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), as well as a regional Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) for Calcasieu Parish. Charleston Area 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Charleston, South Carolina The Charleston area long range transportation plan (LRTP) was developed using a comprehensive multimodal planning process and public outreach program, over a tight nine-month timeline in order to remain compliant with federal regulation. Due to geographic and environmental constraints unique to the South Carolina low country, connectivity was a key element of this plan. With a focus not only on comprehensively evaluating the transportation system and recommending and prioritizing future projects, this project also considered the influences of land uses, development, freight needs, and environmental issues in developing project recommendations. Another key element in this planning process was to effectively engage community groups that had traditionally not been involved with transportation planning through a series of project symposiums, traveling roadshows, and online outreach. The local citizenry was engaged in meaningful discussions about travel safety, accessibility, congestion, transit and freight, street design, and bicycle and pedestrian improvements. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 35 Spartanburg Area Transportation Study MPO: Long-Range Transportation Plan Spartanburg, South Carolina This plan updated and, in some cases, recreated the vision for transportation in Spartanburg County, focusing not only on automobiles, but also on bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit users. Freight recommendations are also included in this plan, while environmental justice concerns were considered throughout this planning effort as well. This LRTP was developed under a tight federal deadline of 3 months - the first successful plan in South Carolina created under such a tight timeline. Working closely with SPATS staff, Stantec and its consulting partner, Toole Design Group, examined the current conditions for transportation in the SPATS MPO area. While Spartanburg is the major population center in this area, the consulting team focused not only on transportation needs in Spartanburg, but also on the surrounding towns. As part of this process, Stantec met with a Project Steering Committee, SCDOT and FHWA on a regular basis to ensure that planning efforts had the buy-in of local stakeholders and decision-makers. Public outreach (social media, stakeholder interviews, public work sessions, etc.) conducted as part of the Long-Range Transportation Plan effort indicated that people broadly support walking and bicycling in their communities, while transit is also an important component of the system. Incorporating a Complete Streets (CS) element into this plan, including the recommendation of specific CS “Hot Spot” intersection designs ensured that the needs of all transportation users are considered as part of any new roadway or roadway widening project. City of Cape Coral Storm Surge Study Cape Coral, Florida The City of Cape Coral contracted with Stantec to assess and evaluate the potential damage and impacts as a result of storm surge, sea level rise, and wave action for systems in the two WRFs. For this study, the 1-percent storm event (100-year event) and the 0.2-percent storm event (500-year event) were evaluated. The project included collection of existing as-built and existing topographic data at each of the two facilities. Stantec conducted an analysis and synthesized data from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) local Flood insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS); the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) model; the Sea Level Rise Calculator (SLRC) developed by NOAA and the Army Corp of Engineers; and wave heights were computed via fetch analysis using the Automated Coastal Engineering System (ACES) model. The two WRF sites were evaluated under three conditions with a total of nineteen scenarios at each WRF: 1) Stillwater conditions (surge and tide); 2) Stillwater conditions with five sea level rise scenarios (projected intermediate high for the years 2020, 2040, 2060, 2080, and 2100); and 3) Stillwater conditions with five projected intermediate high sea level rise scenarios in item no. 2 above with wave action added. The work conducted at the City’s two WRFs provides the necessary framework for evaluating strategies to identify partners and potential grant funding opportunities for mitigating current and future risk associated with Climate Change. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 36 Automated Shuttle Feasibility Study and Concept Plan Chamblee, Georgia The City of Chamblee, a rapidly urbanizing suburb of Atlanta, is exploring the use of automated shuttles in their community. Stantec is evaluating the deployment of automated shuttles along the downtown main street, providing first/last mile transit connections to MARTA regional rail and Chamblee’s proposed mobility hub. An automated shuttle system is envisioned to add transit service improvements for the rapidly developing, complete street corridor. Automated shuttles complement Chamblee’s emphasis on multimodal accommodations and comprehensive, transit-oriented developments. We collected and analyzed data from on-the-ground assessments, automated shuttle manufacturers, and public engagement focus groups. With our understanding of the state-of-the-art automated shuttle technology and transit best practices, we generated and evaluated automated shuttle route alternatives. A detailed analysis of the preferred route’s existing conditions identified infrastructure deficiencies that currently restrict automated shuttle operations. Finally, our preliminary concept plan identified the required, recommended, and optional infrastructure improvements for automated shuttle operations. The preliminary concept plan includes shuttle stops, vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) connected intersection design, multimodal accommodations, route conditioning, cost estimates, and operations. We are helping the community understand the costs, benefits, and their readiness for automated transit. The shuttle feasibility study and concept plan is the prerequisite to implementation of the Chamblee automated shuttle pilot, one of the first mixed-traffic automated shuttles in North America. Automated Shuttle Demonstration and Deployment Pinellas County, Florida Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) is the public transportation provider for all of Pinellas County, FL and its 24 incorporated municipalities. With the goal to remain at the forefront of modern transit technology, the agency has implemented regional fare collection, integration with ridesharing services, and bus rapid transit (BRT). This goal, coupled with its emphasis on sustainability and accessibility, makes PSTA’s an ideal system for automated vehicle demonstration and deployment. Stantec has worked with PSTA and stakeholder cities, Clearwater and Dunedin, to develop a concept plan for automated shuttle deployment. These beach cities are year-round destinations for Floridians and tourists alike, and we wanted to capitalize on the numerous points of interest that exist in the cities. The goals of the self-driving shuttle deployment are to improve customer experience and safety through innovation, introduce the technology to the public and stakeholders, and stimulate the local economies within reach of the PSTA system. Upon completion of the feasibility study and concept plan, Pinellas County is now one step closer to introducing automated shuttles into its communities. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 37 Collier MPO Comprehensive Pathways Plan Collier County, Florida The Collier MPO’s 2012 Comprehensive Pathways Plan represented a significant update to the existing pathways plan. RWA conducted the pathways update in coordination the 2035 LRTP minor update, and significantly modified the 2006 Pathways Plan to be more responsive to staff’s needs and the public’s requests associated with ease of use and a simpler project assessment and ranking methodology. Work on the Collier MPO’s 2012 Comprehensive Pathways Plan commenced in February of 2012, and it was adopted in early 2013. Extensive GIS mapping was utilized It involved significant work with a Citizens Advisory Committee to identify countywide bicycle and pedestrian needs and to develop a prioritization system and project rankings. Prior to the 2012, a complex Level of Service methodology was used to assess and rank project needs. A primary goal of this project was to replace the LOS methodology with a more intuitive method of assessing and ranking projects that could be conducted by the MPO Advisory committee and MPO staff. The project entailed significant stakeholder input and extensive efforts to balance the interests of various communities within Collier County. Public meetings, website updates, email blasts and formal presentations before the MPO board were conducted to ensure sufficient public input. Lee MPO Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan Lee County, Florida RWA led a team comprised of professionals to develop Lee County’s first comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian master plan. This project was awarded the 2011 ULI Sustainability Impact Award for promoting alternative modes of transportation, complete streets and compact communities. This project entailed extensive data collection and analysis, public involvement, and development of a needs plan, project evaluation methodology and an implementation plan. As part of the project, the consultant team had to closely coordinate with Lee County and all municipalities within the County in order to ensure uniform data and the development of countywide bike/ped priorities. The development of this plan required an extensive public involvement process that had to ensure participation and collaboration amongst various jurisdictions, staffs and stakeholder groups. The public involvement was anchored by a Project Advisory Committee, to ensure the participation of key stakeholders, and also include a project website, online surveys, public workshops, one-on-one meetings, and volunteer workgroups to ground-truth existing facility data throughout the County. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 38 Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering Studies Stantec conducted miscellaneous traffic studies and provide transportation support as may be requested over the next 12 months. Provided continuing transportation planning and traffic engineering support (on-call) to the client over the next 12-month period. Needs Analysis of Ten New Bridges in Golden Gate Estates Stantec conducted a re-confirming needs analysis for seven new bridges in Golden Gate Estates. Bridges are funded by new sales tax revenues. RFMUD Travel Demand Modeling Services Stantec provided Growth Management Plan Restudies - Modeling Support that included providing travel demand modeling support related to testing the impacts of three land use scenarios TIGER Grant Application Support Stantec assisted County in preparing a TIGER Grant Application, providing project management services, serving as principal planner, and preparing a Benefit Cost Analysis. Collier County Local Area Program (LAP) Technical Support Stantec provided technical support to Collier County Transportation Staff in administering the State’s LAP Program. The services included preparing RFQs, master schedules, and peer review of design plans. Additional Collier County projects within past five years Long Range Planning Collier MPO 2040 LRTP Update - Project Management for the LRTP Team • Coordination of Transit Needs and CFP Networks • Coordination of the Finance Plan Development • Visioning • 2040 SE Data Development • 2040 Forecast • Highway Needs Assessment • Highway Needs Network Development • Highway Cost Feasible Plan Development • Highway CFP Network Development Support • Public Involvement Activities Modeling - Collier 2040 Needs Assessment Network Development • Developed/analyzed 3 Needs Assessment network scenarios • SE Data Updates • Test & evaluate land use changes that affect the TAZ SE data • Cost Feasible Network Alternatives • Evaluate potential amendments to the CFP network • Regional travel demand model used to evaluate network alternatives • 12-County D1RPM • 5,100 TAZs • 46,483 Links • 19,009 Lane Miles • 107.4 million Vehicle Mile Travel • 24 Hours to 3 Days to Run a Simulation GIS - Collier MPO Pathways Facilities Map Update • Data Gathering from Different Sources • Close Interaction & Coordination with Staff • High Quality Cartographic Map Presentation Work previously performed for the MPO 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 39 Recent, Current and Projected Work Everybody wants to win work and secure future opportunities, but to do so without having the ability to properly serve the client due to workload issues is an all too common mistake. Stantec utilizes internal project tracking tools, allowing our project managers to get a daily update on project status as well as projecting future workload to ensure adequate staffing levels. Our backlog of work is constantly being reviewed to make sure we can keep the commitments we make to our clients. Adding to this is the tremendous depth of resources that comes with being a firm of our size and capabilities. Stantec has determined after careful review of current and future workload that we have adequate staff to assign to this project to ensure timely delivery of the design, as evidenced by the table below. Team Members Role Availability Chris Brockmeier, PE Principal-in-Charge Carmen Monroy Project Manager Frank Domingo, PE Transportation Planning/Smart Mobility Mike Rutkowski, PE AICP Transportation Planning Chris Benitez, PE Traffic Engineering Matt Crim, PE, PTOE Traffic Engineering Jeff Perry, AICP Consultant/Subject Matter Expert Jamie Snow Systems Planning Heejo Ham, PhD Systems Planning Graeme Masterton Transit Planning Michelle Orfield Transportation Disadvantaged Planninng Patrick Vanesse, AICP Bike/Pedestrian Planning Howard Glassman MPO Policy Planning Silvia Beltre, PE Sub-Area/Corridor Studies Sumeet Kishnani, PE PTOE Origin/Destination Studies Cynthia Albright, FAICP GISP Socio-Economic Data Manny Perez, GISP GIS Development and Technical Support Richard Pascoe, GISP GIS Development and Technical Support Glenn Davis Transportation Statistics Matt Starr, PG Resiliency (Coastal) Caroline Cunningham, AICP Resiliency (Hazard Mitigation & Sea Level Rise Katie LaBarr, AICP Resiliency (Sustainability) Jared Beck, AICP Public Involvement Veronica Paredes Public Involvement Kris Cella Public Involvement Joel Mann, AICP Autonomous Vehicles/Ride Hailing Services Ashley Thompson Autonomous Vehicles/Ride Hailing Services Tom Trettis, CSE PE PWS Environmental Data Collection/Analysis Jeffrey Weidner, PE Freight Planning 30% 90% 40% 60% 50% 40% 10% 40% 20% 35% 25% 25% 50% 35% 40% 40% 30% 15% 30% 30% 40% 70% 80% 3. Workloads 25% 15% 30% 40% 30% 40% 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 40 Licenses and Certificates Vendor Checklist Form 1: CVendor Declaration Statement Form 2: Conflict of Interest Certificaiton Affidavit Form 3: Immigration Affidavit Certification Form 4: Local Vendor Preference Certification Form 5: Reference Questionaires Insurance Certificates Exhibit 1.B Grant Certifications and Assurances W-9 Addendum 1 & 2 Sunbiz Documentation E-Verify/Immigrantion Affidavit MOU Forms 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 41 State of Florida Department of State I certify from the records of this office that STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.is a New York corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida,qualified on November 14,2001. The document number of this corporation is F01000005948. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31,2020,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 16,2020,and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee,the Capital,this the Twenty-sixth day of February, 2020 Tracking Number:1855267277CU To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number,and then follow the instructions displayed. https://services.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertificateOfStatus/CertificateAuthentication Licenses and Certificates Halsey Beshears, SecretaryRon DeSantis, Governor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE ENGINEERING BUSINESS HEREIN IS AUTHORIZED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. Do not alter this document in any form. 370 INTERLOCKEN BLVD. LICENSE NUMBER: CA27013 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2021 This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document. SUITE 300 BROOMFIELD CO 80021 Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com Ron DeSantis, Governor STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES BROCKMEIER, CHRIS E. Do not alter this document in any form. 1909 CELTIC ROAD LICENSE NUMBER: PE56859 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2021 This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document. TALLAHASSEE FL 32317 Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com JONATHAN ZACHEM, SECRETARYRICK SCOTT, GOVERNOR STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES DOMINGO, FRANCISCO B. Do not alter this document in any form. 5456 CORK OAK STREET LICENSE NUMBER: PE51601 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2021 This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document. SARASOTA FL 34232 Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com Halsey Beshears, SecretaryRon DeSantis, Governor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES CRIM, MATTHEW R. Do not alter this document in any form. 4572 HYACINTH DRIVE LICENSE NUMBER: PE68297 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2021 This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document. MASON OH 45040 Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS No. 18-7432-MP // Professional Services Library – Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 42 Halsey Beshears, SecretaryRon DeSantis, Governor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGISTS THE PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGIST HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 492, FLORIDA STATUTES STARR, MATTHEW SCOTT Do not alter this document in any form. 1335 46TH AVE NE LICENSE NUMBER: PG2906 EXPIRATION DATE: JULY 31, 2022 This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document. SAINT PETERSBURG FL 33703 Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com Halsey Beshears, SecretaryRon DeSantis, Governor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES BELTRE, SILVIA MERINO Do not alter this document in any form. 8265 NW 163 STREET LICENSE NUMBER: PE51295 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2021 This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document. MIAMI LAKES FL 33016 Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com Halsey Beshears, SecretaryRon DeSantis, Governor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES BENITEZ, CHRISTOPHER Do not alter this document in any form. 18530 SW 97TH PLACE LICENSE NUMBER: PE74035 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2021 This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document. CUTLER BAY FL 33157 Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5Packet Pg. 314Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACH REQUIRED REFERENCE) Solicitation: Whippoorwill Lane and Marbella Lakes Drive Connection Reference Questionnaire for: Stantec Consulting Services Incorporated (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Jeff Perry, AICP (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Lorraine Lantz, AICP (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov FAX: Telephone: (239) 252-5779 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: Whippoorwill Lane – Marbella Lakes Drive Interconnection Study Completion Date: April 12, 2019 Project Budget: $39,481 Project Number of Days: 309 Item Criteria Score (must be completed) 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 SUBMITTED BY - LORRAINE LANTZ – 6/2/2020 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Collier County Solicitation 18-7 452 �S..-D!vuin Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 18-7452 - Livingston Road and Pine Ridge Continuous Flow Intersection Reference Questionnaire for: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Frank Domingo (Name oflndividuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Justin Powell, VP (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Palmer Ranch Holdings, LTD. (Evaluator's Company completing reference) . justin@pranch.com Email: FAX: Telephone941-922-0759 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored "O." (Please note, references from Collier County staff will not be accepted.) Project Description: Bay Street Extension Project Budget: $5,800,000 Completion Date: Projected: November 2018 Project Number of Days: _4_7_0 _______ _ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). It) 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). Ir\ 3 Quality of work. ,_ 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. I() 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. /(\ 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) \(') 7 Ability to verbally communic ate and document information clearly and succinctly. lo 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. ID 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). ( ( J TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS ,ff_/J 8/9/2018 7:36 AM p.23 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Form W-9 (Rev. October 2018) Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification ▶Go to www.irs.gov/FormW9 for instructions and the latest information. Give Form to the requester. Do not send to the IRS.Print or type. See Specific Instructions on page 3.1 Name (as shown on your income tax return). Name is required on this line; do not leave this line blank. 2 Business name/disregarded entity name, if different from above 3 Check appropriate box for federal tax classification of the person whose name is entered on line 1. Check only one of the following seven boxes. Individual/sole proprietor or single-member LLC C Corporation S Corporation Partnership Trust/estate Limited liability company. Enter the tax classification (C=C corporation, S=S corporation, P=Partnership) ▶ Note: Check the appropriate box in the line above for the tax classification of the single-member owner. Do not check LLC if the LLC is classified as a single-member LLC that is disregarded from the owner unless the owner of the LLC is another LLC that is not disregarded from the owner for U.S. federal tax purposes. Otherwise, a single-member LLC that is disregarded from the owner should check the appropriate box for the tax classification of its owner. Other (see instructions) ▶ 4 Exemptions (codes apply only to certain entities, not individuals; see instructions on page 3): Exempt payee code (if any) Exemption from FATCA reporting code (if any) (Applies to accounts maintained outside the U.S.) 5 Address (number, street, and apt. or suite no.) See instructions. 6 City, state, and ZIP code Requester’s name and address (optional) 7 List account number(s) here (optional) Part I Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) Enter your TIN in the appropriate box. The TIN provided must match the name given on line 1 to avoid backup withholding. For individuals, this is generally your social security number (SSN). However, for a resident alien, sole proprietor, or disregarded entity, see the instructions for Part I, later. For other entities, it is your employer identification number (EIN). If you do not have a number, see How to get a TIN, later. Note: If the account is in more than one name, see the instructions for line 1. Also see What Name and Number To Give the Requester for guidelines on whose number to enter. Social security number –– or Employer identification number – Part II Certification Under penalties of perjury, I certify that: 1. The number shown on this form is my correct taxpayer identification number (or I am waiting for a number to be issued to me); and 2. I am not subject to backup withholding because: (a) I am exempt from backup withholding, or (b) I have not been notified by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that I am subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest or dividends, or (c) the IRS has notified me that I am no longer subject to backup withholding; and 3. I am a U.S. citizen or other U.S. person (defined below); and 4. The FATCA code(s) entered on this form (if any) indicating that I am exempt from FATCA reporting is correct. Certification instructions. You must cross out item 2 above if you have been notified by the IRS that you are currently subject to backup withholding because you have failed to report all interest and dividends on your tax return. For real estate transactions, item 2 does not apply. For mortgage interest paid, acquisition or abandonment of secured property, cancellation of debt, contributions to an individual retirement arrangement (IRA), and generally, payments other than interest and dividends, you are not required to sign the certification, but you must provide your correct TIN. See the instructions for Part II, later. Sign Here Signature of U.S. person ▶Date ▶ General Instructions Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise noted. Future developments. For the latest information about developments related to Form W-9 and its instructions, such as legislation enacted after they were published, go to www.irs.gov/FormW9. Purpose of Form An individual or entity (Form W-9 requester) who is required to file an information return with the IRS must obtain your correct taxpayer identification number (TIN) which may be your social security number (SSN), individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN), adoption taxpayer identification number (ATIN), or employer identification number (EIN), to report on an information return the amount paid to you, or other amount reportable on an information return. Examples of information returns include, but are not limited to, the following. • Form 1099-INT (interest earned or paid) • Form 1099-DIV (dividends, including those from stocks or mutual funds) • Form 1099-MISC (various types of income, prizes, awards, or gross proceeds) • Form 1099-B (stock or mutual fund sales and certain other transactions by brokers) • Form 1099-S (proceeds from real estate transactions) • Form 1099-K (merchant card and third party network transactions) • Form 1098 (home mortgage interest), 1098-E (student loan interest), 1098-T (tuition) • Form 1099-C (canceled debt) • Form 1099-A (acquisition or abandonment of secured property) Use Form W-9 only if you are a U.S. person (including a resident alien), to provide your correct TIN. If you do not return Form W-9 to the requester with a TIN, you might be subject to backup withholding. See What is backup withholding, later. Cat. No. 10231X Form W-9 (Rev. 10-2018) 1/17/2020 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Company ID Number: 45737 THE E-VERIFY PROGRAM FOR EMPLOYMENT VERIFICATION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ARTICLE I PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) sets forth the points of agreement between the Social Security Administration (SSA), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Employer) regarding the Employer's participation in the Employment Eligibility Verification Program (E-Verify). E-Verify is a program in which the employment eligibility of all newly hired employees will be confirmed after the Employment Eligibility Verification Form (Form I-9) has been completed. Authority for the E-Verify program is found in Title IV, Subtitle A, of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), Pub. L. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009, as amended (8 U.S.C. § 1324a note). ARTICLE II FUNCTIONS TO BE PERFORMED A.RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE SSA 1.Upon completion of the Form I-9 by the employee and the Employer, and provided the Employer complies with the requirements of this MOU, SSA agrees to provide the Employer with available information that allows the Employer to confirm the accuracy of Social Security Numbers provided by all newly hired employees and the employment authorization of U.S. citizens. 2.The SSA agrees to provide to the Employer appropriate assistance with operational problems that may arise during the Employer's participation in the E-Verify program. The SSA agrees to provide the Employer with names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of SSA representatives to be contacted during the E-Verify process. 3.The SSA agrees to safeguard the information provided by the Employer through the E- Verify program procedures, and to limit access to such information, as is appropriate by law, to individuals responsible for the verification of Social Security Numbers and for evaluation of the E-Verify program or such other persons or entities who may be authorized by the SSA as governed by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. § 552a), the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1306(a)), and SSA regulations (20 CFR Part 401). 4.SSA agrees to establish a means of automated verification that is designed (in conjunction with DHS's automated system if necessary) to provide confirmation or tentative nonconfirmation of U.S. citizens’ employment eligibility and accuracy of SSA records for both citizens and aliens within 3 Federal Government work days of the initial inquiry. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Company ID Number: 45737 5.SSA agrees to establish a means of secondary verification (including updating SSA records as may be necessary) for employees who contest SSA tentative nonconfirmations that is designed to provide final confirmation or nonconfirmation of U.S. citizens’ employment eligibility and accuracy of SSA records for both citizens and aliens within 10 Federal Government work days of the date of referral to SSA, unless SSA determines that more than 10 days may be necessary. In such cases, SSA will provide additional verification instructions. B.RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 1.Upon completion of the Form I-9 by the employee and the Employer and after SSA verifies the accuracy of SSA records for aliens through E-Verify, DHS agrees to provide the Employer access to selected data from DHS's database to enable the Employer to conduct: Automated verification checks on newly hired alien employees by electronic means, and Photo verification checks (when available) on newly hired alien employees. 2.DHS agrees to provide to the Employer appropriate assistance with operational problems that may arise during the Employer's participation in the E-Verify program. DHS agrees to provide the Employer names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of DHS representatives to be contacted during the E-Verify process. 3.DHS agrees to provide to the Employer a manual (the E-Verify Manual) containing instructions on E-Verify policies, procedures and requirements for both SSA and DHS, including restrictions on the use of E-Verify.. DHS agrees to provide training materials on E-Verify. 4.DHS agrees to provide to the Employer a notice, which indicates the Employer's participation in the E-Verify program. DHS also agrees to provide to the Employer anti- discrimination notices issued by the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC), Civil Rights Division, and U.S. Department of Justice. 5.DHS agrees to issue the Employer a user identification number and password that permits the Employer to verify information provided by alien employees with DHS's database. 6.DHS agrees to safeguard the information provided to DHS by the Employer, and to limit access to such information to individuals responsible for the verification of alien employment eligibility and for evaluation of the E-Verify program, or to such other persons or entities as may be authorized by applicable law. Information will be used only to verify the accuracy of Social Security Numbers and employment eligibility, to enforce the Immigration and Nationality Act and federal criminal laws, and to ensure accurate wage reports to the SSA. 7.DHS agrees to establish a means of automated verification that is designed (in conjunction with SSA verification procedures) to provide confirmation or tentative nonconfirmation of employees' employment eligibility within 3 Federal Government work days of the initial inquiry. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Company ID Number: 45737 8.DHS agrees to establish a means of secondary verification (including updating DHS records as may be necessary) for employees who contest DHS tentative nonconfirmations and photo non-match tentative nonconfirmations that is designed to provide final confirmation or nonconfirmation of the employees' employment eligibility within 10 Federal Government work days of the date of referral to DHS, unless DHS determines that more than 10 days may be necessary. In such cases, DHS will provide additional verification instructions. C.RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EMPLOYER 1.The Employer agrees to display the notices supplied by DHS in a prominent place that is clearly visible to prospective employees. 2.The Employer agrees to provide to the SSA and DHS the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of the Employer representatives to be contacted regarding E-Verify. 3.The Employer agrees to become familiar with and comply with the E-Verify Manual. 4.The Employer agrees that any Employer Representative who will perform employment verification queries will complete the E-Verify Tutorial before that individual initiates any queries. A. The employer agrees that all employer representatives will take the refresher tutorials initiated by the E-Verify program as a condition of continued use of E- Verify. B. Failure to complete a refresher tutorial will prevent the employer from continued use of the program. 5.The Employer agrees to comply with established Form I-9 procedures, with two exceptions: If an employee presents a "List B" identity document, the Employer agrees to only accept "List B" documents that contain a photo. (List B documents identified in 8 C.F.R. § 274a.2 (b) (1) (B)) can be presented during the Form I-9 process to establish identity). If an employee presents a DHS Form I-551 (Permanent Resident Card) or Form I-766 (Employment Authorization Document) to complete the Form I-9, the Employer agrees to make a photocopy of the document and to retain the photocopy with the employee’s Form I-9. The employer will use the photocopy to verify the photo and to assist the Department with its review of photo non-matches that are contested by employees. Note that employees retain the right to present any List A, or List B and List C, documentation to complete the Form I-9. DHS may in the future designate other documents that activate the photo screening tool. 6.The Employer understands that participation in E-Verify does not exempt the Employer from the responsibility to complete, retain, and make available for inspection Forms I-9 that relate to its employees, or from other requirements of applicable regulations or laws, except for the following modified requirements applicable by reason of the Employer's participation in E- Verify: (1) identity documents must have photos, as described in paragraph 5 above; (2) a 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Company ID Number: 45737 rebuttable presumption is established that the Employer has not violated section 274A(a)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) with respect to the hiring of any individual if it obtains confirmation of the identity and employment eligibility of the individual in compliance with the terms and conditions of E-Verify ; (3) the Employer must notify DHS if it continues to employ any employee after receiving a final nonconfirmation, and is subject to a civil money penalty between $500 and $1,000 for each failure to notify DHS of continued employment following a final nonconfirmation; (4) the Employer is subject to a rebuttable presumption that it has knowingly employed an unauthorized alien in violation of section 274A(a)(1)(A) if the Employer continues to employ any employee after receiving a final nonconfirmation; and (5) no person or entity participating in E-Verify is civilly or criminally liable under any law for any action taken in good faith on information provided through the confirmation system. DHS reserves the right to conduct Form I-9 compliance inspections during the course of E-Verify, as well as to conduct any other enforcement activity authorized by law. 7.The Employer agrees to initiate E-Verify verification procedures within 3 Employer business days after each employee has been hired (but after both sections 1 and 2 of the Form I-9 have been completed), and to complete as many (but only as many) steps of the E-Verify process as are necessary according to the E-Verify Manual. The Employer is prohibited from initiating verification procedures before the employee has been hired and the Form I-9 completed. If the automated system to be queried is temporarily unavailable, the 3-day time period is extended until it is again operational in order to accommodate the Employer's attempting, in good faith, to make inquiries during the period of unavailability. In all cases, the Employer must use the SSA verification procedures first, and use DHS verification procedures and photo screening tool only after the the SSA verification response has been given. 8.The Employer agrees not to use E-Verify procedures for pre-employment screening of job applicants, support for any unlawful employment practice, or any other use not authorized by this MOU. The Employer must use E-Verify for all new employees and will not verify only certain employees selectively. The Employer agrees not to use E-Verify procedures for re- verification, or for employees hired before the date this MOU is in effect. The Employer understands that if the Employer uses E-Verify procedures for any purpose other than as authorized by this MOU, the Employer may be subject to appropriate legal action and the immediate termination of its access to SSA and DHS information pursuant to this MOU. 9.The Employer agrees to follow appropriate procedures (see Article III.B. below) regarding tentative nonconfirmations, including notifying employees of the finding, providing written referral instructions to employees, allowing employees to contest the finding, and not taking adverse action against employees if they choose to contest the finding. Further, when employees contest a tentative nonconfirmation based upon a photo non-match, the Employer is required to take affirmative steps (see Article III.B. below) to contact DHS with information necessary to resolve the challenge. 10.The Employer agrees not to take any adverse action against an employee based upon the employee's employment eligibility status while SSA or DHS is processing the verification request unless the Employer obtains knowledge (as defined in 8 C.F.R. § 274a.1 (l)) that the employee is not work authorized. The Employer understands that an initial inability of the SSA or DHS automated verification to verify work authorization, a tentative nonconfirmation,or the finding of 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Company ID Number: 45737 a photo non-match, does not mean, and should not be interpreted as, an indication that the employee is not work authorized. In any of the cases listed above, the employee must be provided the opportunity to contest the finding, and if he or she does so, may not be terminated or suffer any adverse employment consequences until and unless secondary verification by SSA or DHS has been completed and a final nonconfirmation has been issued. If the employee does not choose to contest a tentative nonconfirmation or a photo non-match, then the Employer can find the employee is not work authorized and take the appropriate action. 11.The Employer agrees to comply with section 274B of the INA by not discriminating unlawfully against any individual in hiring, firing, or recruitment or referral practices because of his or her national origin or, in the case of a protected individual as defined in section 274B(a)(3) of the INA, because of his or her citizenship status. The Employer understands that such illegal practices can include selective verification or use of E-Verify, discharging or refusing to hire eligible employees because they appear or sound “foreign”, and premature termination of employees based upon tentative nonconfirmations, and that any violation of the unfair immigration-related employment practices provisions of the INA could subject the Employer to civil penalties pursuant to section 274B of the INA and the termination of its participation in E- Verify. If the Employer has any questions relating to the anti-discrimination provision, it should contact OSC at 1-800-255-7688 or 1-800-237-2515 (TDD). 12.The Employer agrees to record the case verification number on the employee's Form I-9 or to print the screen containing the case verification number and attach it to the employee's Form I-9. 13.The Employer agrees that it will use the information it receives from the SSA or DHS pursuant to E-Verify and this MOU only to confirm the employment eligibility of newly-hired employees after completion of the Form I-9. The Employer agrees that it will safeguard this information, and means of access to it (such as PINS and passwords) to ensure that it is not used for any other purpose and as necessary to protect its confidentiality, including ensuring that it is not disseminated to any person other than employees of the Employer who are authorized to perform the Employer's responsibilities under this MOU. 14.The Employer acknowledges that the information which it receives from SSA is governed by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. § 552a (i) (1) and (3)) and the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1306(a)), and that any person who obtains this information under false pretenses or uses it for any purpose other than as provided for in this MOU may be subject to criminal penalties. 15.The Employer agrees to allow DHS and SSA, or their authorized agents or designees, to make periodic visits to the Employer for the purpose of reviewing E-Verify -related records, i.e., Forms I-9, SSA Transaction Records, and DHS verification records, which were created during the Employer's participation in the E-Verify Program. In addition, for the purpose of evaluating E-Verify, the Employer agrees to allow DHS and SSA or their authorized agents or designees, to interview it regarding its experience with E-Verify, to interview employees hired during E-Verify use concerning their experience with the pilot, and to make employment and E-Verify related records available to DHS and the SSA, or their designated agents or designees. Failure to comply with the terms of this paragraph may lead DHS to terminate the Employer’s access to E-Verify. 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Company ID Number: 45737 ARTICLE III REFERRAL OF INDIVIDUALS TO THE SSA AND THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY A.REFERRAL TO THE SSA 1.If the Employer receives a tentative nonconfirmation issued by SSA, the Employer must print the tentative nonconfirmation notice as directed by the automated system and provide it to the employee so that the employee may determine whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation. 2.The Employer will refer employees to SSA field offices only as directed by the automated system based on a tentative nonconfirmation, and only after the Employer records the case verification number, reviews the input to detect any transaction errors, and determines that the employee contests the tentative nonconfirmation. The Employer will transmit the Social Security Number to SSA for verification again if this review indicates a need to do so. The Employer will determine whether the employee contests the tentative nonconfirmation as soon as possible after the Employer receives it. 3.If the employee contests an SSA tentative nonconfirmation, the Employer will provide the employee with a referral letter and instruct the employee to visit an SSA office to resolve the discrepancy within 8 Federal Government work days. The Employer will make a second inquiry to the SSA database using E-Verify procedures on the date that is 10 Federal Government work days after the date of the referral in order to obtain confirmation, or final nonconfirmation, unless otherwise instructed by SSA or unless SSA determines that more than 10 days is necessary to resolve the tentative nonconfirmation.. 4.The Employer agrees not to ask the employee to obtain a printout from the Social Security Number database (the Numident) or other written verification of the Social Security Number from the SSA. B. REFERRAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 1.If the Employer receives a tentative nonconfirmation issued by DHS, the Employer must print the tentative nonconfirmation notice as directed by the automated system and provide it to the employee so that the employee may determine whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation. 2.If the Employer finds a photo non-match for an alien who provides a document for which the automated system has transmitted a photo, the employer must print the photo non-match tentative nonconfirmation notice as directed by the automated system and provide it to the employee so that the employee may determine whether he or she will contest the finding. 3.The Employer agrees to refer individuals to DHS only when the employee chooses to contest a tentative nonconfirmation received from DHS automated verification process or when 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Company ID Number: 45737 the Employer issues a tentative nonconfirmation based upon a photo non-match. The Employer will determine whether the employee contests the tentative nonconfirmation as soon as possible after the Employer receives it. 4.If the employee contests a tentative nonconfirmation issued by DHS, the Employer will provide the employee with a referral letter and instruct the employee to contact the Department through its toll-free hotline within 8 Federal Government work days. 5.If the employee contests a tentative nonconfirmation based upon a photo non-match, the Employer will provide the employee with a referral letter to DHS. DHS will electronically transmit the result of the referral to the Employer within 10 Federal Government work days of the referral unless it determines that more than 10 days is necessary. 6.The Employer agrees that if an employee contests a tentative nonconfirmation based upon a photo non-match, the Employer will send a copy of the employee’s Form I-551 or Form I- 766 to DHS for review by: Scanning and uploading the document,or Sending a photocopy of the document by an express mail account (furnished and paid for by DHS). 7. The Employer understands that if it cannot determine whether there is a photo match/non-match, the Employer is required to forward the employee’s documentation to DHS by scanning and uploading, or by sending the document as described in the preceding paragraph, and resolving the case as specified by the Immigration Services Verifier at DHS who will determine the photo match or non-match. ARTICLE IV SERVICE PROVISIONS The SSA and DHS will not charge the Employer for verification services performed under this MOU. The Employer is responsible for providing equipment needed to make inquiries. To access the E-Verify System, an Employer will need a personal computer with Internet access. ARTICLE V PARTIES This MOU is effective upon the signature of all parties, and shall continue in effect for as long as the SSA and DHS conduct the E-Verify program unless modified in writing by the mutual consent of all parties, or terminated by any party upon 30 days prior written notice to the others. Any and all system enhancements to the E-Verify program by DHS or SSA, including but not limited to the E-Verify checking against additional data sources and instituting new verification procedures, will be covered under this MOU and will not cause the need for a supplemental MOU that outlines these changes. DHS agrees to train employers on all changes made to E-Verify through the use of mandatory refresher tutorials and updates to the E-Verify manual. Even 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Company ID Number: 45737 without changes to E-Verify, the Department reserves the right to require employers to take mandatory refresher tutorials. Termination by any party shall terminate the MOU as to all parties. The SSA or DHS may terminate this MOU without prior notice if deemed necessary because of the requirements of law or policy, or upon a determination by SSA or DHS that there has been a breach of system integrity or security by the Employer, or a failure on the part of the Employer to comply with established procedures or legal requirements. Some or all SSA and DHS responsibilities under this MOU may be performed by contractor(s), and SSA and DHS may adjust verification responsibilities between each other as they may determine. Nothing in this MOU is intended, or should be construed, to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any third party against the United States, its agencies, officers, or employees, or against the Employer, its agents, officers, or employees. Each party shall be solely responsible for defending any claim or action against it arising out of or related to E-Verify or this MOU, whether civil or criminal, and for any liability wherefrom, including (but not limited to) any dispute between the Employer and any other person or entity regarding the applicability of Section 403(d) of IIRIRA to any action taken or allegedly taken by the Employer. The employer understands that the fact of its participation in E-Verify is not confidential information and may be disclosed as authorized or required by law and DHS or SSA policy, including but not limited to, Congressional oversight, E-Verify publicity and media inquiries, and responses to inquiries under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The foregoing constitutes the full agreement on this subject between the SSA, DHS, and the Employer. The individuals whose signatures appear below represent that they are authorized to enter into this MOU on behalf of the Employer and DHS respectively. To be accepted as a participant in E-Verify, you should only sign the Employer’s Section of the signature page. If you have any questions, contact E-Verify Operations at 888-464- 4218. Employer Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Diane M Kelly ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Name (Please type or print) ________________________________________________________________________ Title Electronically Signed ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature 06/19/2007 ________________________________________________________________________ Date Department of Homeland Security –Verification Division 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Company ID Number: 45737 USCIS Verification Division ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Name (Please type or print) ________________________________________________________________________ Title Electronically Signed ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature 06/19/2007 ________________________________________________________________________ Date 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd., Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34108 239.649.4040 9.E.5 Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Stantec Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIBRARY Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services C Solicitation No: 18-7432-MP Prepared for Collier MPO Collier County August 6, 2020 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP)   Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.  5801 Pelican Bay Boulevard   Suite 505  Naples, FL 34108      Project Manager: Bill Gramer, PE, AICP  Tel: 239.431.9222  Bill.gramer@Jacobs.com  August 6, 2020 Procurement Services Division 3295 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg C-2 Naples, FL 34112 Subject: Professional Services Library Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services C, RFP #18-7432-MP Dear Evaluation Committee Members:  Providing the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) with top quality planning and engineering services requires a proven, multidisciplinary firm that brings superior technical capabilities and project management experience to meet your overall project requirements and schedules. With our extensive planning and engineering experience throughout Southwest Florida and worldwide, as well as our 30-year history of experience in Collier County, our staff has the skills and expertise required to successfully and cost-effectively deliver any projects assigned to Jacobs. Jacobs - The Right Partner for the Collier MPO   Jacobs is currently providing services to the Collier MPO under the existing 16-6562 General Services Contract and we look forward to our continued partnership on the upcoming contract. Our Proposed Staff As demonstrated in our proposal, our team is comprised of staff well known to the Collier MPO, Collier County, and the FDOT who can assist you and your stakeholders with all your project needs. You will be working with the same team of professionals you already know, backed by the deepest and brightest bench of resources in the industry. Our team members are experienced serving diverse client needs from project development and environmental, to planning, engineering, permitting, traffic, grant writing, program management, economic analysis, and staff augmentation. We can provide the MPO and its stakeholders full access to an unparalleled depth and breadth of technical resources and subject matter experts mobilized, and coordinated, from our Southwest Florida office located in Naples. Our Project Manager Our team will be led by Project Manager Bill Gramer, PE, AICP. Bill is a hands-on planning/engineering manager who brings extensive experience in local government and MPO transportation planning to the Collier MPO’s contract. His recent work on similar planning projects in Southwest Florida, including work for Collier MPO, Collier County Transportation and Planning staff, Lee County MPO, and FDOT 1 makes him extremely well-suited to lead this contract. Bill’s recent experience with the Collier MPO includes managing the Collier MPO’s 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) update, coordinating the CAT Park and Ride Study, and completing the Golden Gate City Walkable Community Study. He has 30 years of transportation planning, design, and construction management experience and has served as project manager and/or project coordinator for all the major roadway projects our firm has completed in Southwest Florida. Bill will manage project services and deliverables from our local Naples office. He has successfully managed dozens of planning contracts including the Collier MPO’s and Lee County MPO’s General Services Contract as well as 12 General Service Planning, Transportation, and Traffic contracts similar to this contract. Project Manager Bill Gramer conducting a Roadway Safety Audit for S.R.T.S. Grant with Collier County staff and project stakeholders. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP)   Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Our Team To add specialized expertise and augment our capabilities, Jacobs has once again teamed with the following sub-consultant firms: ALTA Planning + Design Inc., Cella Molnar and Associates, Spikowski and Associates, and Traf-O-Data. These firms were selected for their familiarity with the Collier MPO; experience planning in Collier County; their reputation for producing quality work; and their ability to deliver work products on time and within budget. Our Transportation Experience Allows Us to Anticipate Your Needs  Jacobs’ Credentials Jacobs is among the largest providers of transportation planning, design, and construction management services in the U.S. In addition to the depth of technical resources within our proposed team organization, we have the ability to deploy additional subject matter expertise as needed. Our local Naples office can draw resources from all our offices (including 3,600+ Florida staff) because of our client-centric culture of project delivery. Our exceptional resources will be the Collier MPO and Collier County’s resources! Collier MPO Short and Long-Term Needs We understand the Collier MPO is committed to progressive public policy, superior public service, and responsible management of public resources, to meet the current and future needs of the citizens of Collier County. Collier is located in one of the fastest growing areas in Florida. The permanent population of approximately 375,000 residents and influx of peak season residents (+80,000 people +/-) puts a strain on its transportation infrastructure. According to the University of Florida’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR), the expected county‐wide population for the year 2045 is 516,100 people (medium projection). This expected growth will require significant planning, design, and construction to ensure an efficient and effective multi-modal transportation system will be in place to provide residents, workers, and visitors a safe and accessible mode of travel. The majority of these efforts start with the Collier MPO, with approval from the MPO Board, to establish the County’s Needs Plans and Cost Feasible Transportation Network Plans. The Collier MPO’s efforts ensure the quality of life that the residents of Collier County enjoy. We believe the Collier MPO is looking for committed partners that have an appreciation of the County’s needs with a strong acumen in transportation, traffic, and drainage infrastructure and will deliver high-quality services on time and within budget. Benefits Jacobs Offers Collier MPO Our understanding of the Collier MPO’s needs establishes the foundation for contract- and project-level success. In support of these critical needs, the Jacobs Team provides the following benefits We are Planning Experts with Significant Experience Working with Collier County and Throughout Florida. For more than 30 years, Jacobs has successfully delivered a broad range of transportation planning and design services for Collier County, as well as many other clients throughout Florida including Lee, Sarasota, Charlotte, Hillsborough, Pinellas, Seminole, and Broward Counties; FDOT Districts 1, 5 and 7, City of Bonita Springs, and the Seminole Tribe of Florida. Our extensive local and national experience delivering planning and design services ensures that the Collier MPO will benefit from our proven tools, methodologies, and lessons learned. Excellent Understanding of Collier MPO’s Transportation Planning Role and Unified Planning Work Program. Jacobs understands the roles, responsibilities, involvement, and needs of the Collier MPO with regards to Regional Planning, Short Range Planning, Long Range Planning, Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning, Public Transportation Planning, Goods and Freight Movement Planning and Congestion Management/ITS. Jacobs is currently preparing the Collier 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan for the MPO. In addition, our work on the LRTP includes Traffic Modeling (CUBE Voyager) and scenario planning using the FDOT District 1 Regional Planning Model (D1RPM). Jacobs has three Decades of Experience Working for Collier County Under General Service Contracts. Through our previous experience providing planning, design, permitting, construction management, and grant writing services to the Collier MPO, Collier County Transportation, Planning, Stormwater, Utility, and Facilities Departments, our team has gained an acute understanding of local conditions that will facilitate coordination and communication between Collier MPO staff and Jacobs. Our Naples-based Jacobs staff is currently providing general services to Collier County under Contract # 18-7432 Professional Services Library, for nine disciplines: 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP)   Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C We Offer a “Plangineering” Approach. Evaluating project assignments from a Planning as well as an Engineering standpoint provides alternatives that have been vetted for feasibility, constructability, and affordability. Too often projects identified in an Agencies Cost Feasible Plan have funding shortfalls when moved into design. We will provide you with cost estimates that are based not only on FDOT Statewide Averages and Area Averages Cost Data, but will consider the recent and projected Collier County project bidding environment. This is a unique skillset in our industry and will provide you a sense of assurance when moving projects forward from Planning to Design and Construction. We bring Extensive Knowledge and Experience with FDOT District 1. Jacobs is prequalified by the FDOT in all services that may be required for this contract, and is prepared to deliver efficient, coordinated, professional services to the Collier MPO. The Multi- Use Corridors of Regional Economic Significance (M-CORES) Program, currently being implemented by FDOT District 1, will have a significant effect on the overall transportation network in Collier County and will require planning and coordination with FDOT District 1 staff and their consultants. Jacobs can facilitate coordination based on our understanding of the program and established history working with FDOT District One staff. Successful Loan and Grant Research and Application Preparation. Our team is skilled in researching opportunities, preparing applications, obtaining grant funding, and providing grant reporting for a variety of infrastructure projects. Jacobs served as lead author on two winning T.I.G.E.R. Grant Applications, one for Collier County Transportation Planning (Immokalee Complete Streets) and one for the Lee County MPO (Lee County Complete Streets). Jacobs also recently assisted Collier County Transportation Planning with two winning Safe Routes to School Grant Applications (Eden Park Elementary and Shadowlawn Elementary). Jacobs is Non-Conflicted. We have no conflicts of interest on potential project assignments within Collier County, either real or perceived, that would result in project stakeholders contesting the results of our findings. This is critical to the successful completion of many projects, as any perception of an “Agenda” by the project team will lead to misunderstandings, mistrust, and a poor project image. After reviewing our response to this RPS, we trust that you will feel as we do – that the expertise, experience, and depth of the Jacobs team offers the Collier MPO the greatest advantage in achieving quality projects that are on time and within budget. Sincerely, Jacobs Bill Gramer, P.E., AICP Project Manager – V.P. Transportation   9.E.6 Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services 1 Criterion 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Criteria 1 Ability of Professional Personnel Qualifications of the Team Members Assigned to your Contract ............................................... 1-1 Local, Experienced Personnel Committed to Project Success .................................................. 1-2 Criterion 2 Past Performance Unparalleled Knowledge of Collier County ................................................................................. 2-1 Relevant Experience in a Broad Range of Services that Mirror the County’s Scope for RPS #18-7432-MP ................................................................................................................ 2-2 References ................................................................................................................................. 2-2 Criterion 3 Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm Workload / Availability of Assigned Personnel ........................................................................... 3-1 Nationwide Reachback .............................................................................................................. 3-1 Ability to Complete On Time and Within Budget ........................................................................ 3-1 Resumes Forms and Certifications 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Criterion 1. Ability of Professional Personnel9.E.6 Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services 1-1 Criterion 1 ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL Criterion 1 Jacobs has assembled a local team that aligns capabilities and experience with the requirements of Collier County’s scope of services. Together with subconsultants Traf-O-Data, Alta Planning + Design, Cella Molnar & Associates, and Spikowski Planning Associates, we offer you the regional knowledge, established local and state relationships, and all the skills required for successful delivery of your projects. Qualifications of the Team Members Assigned to your Contract Jacobs As a full-service engineering firm with a local office in Naples and more than 10 fully staffed offices in Florida, Jacobs has had the opportunity to provide many of the services listed in the County’s RPS for Florida clients, including the Collier MPO and Collier County. For the Collier MPO and Collier County departments alone, we have delivered more than 100 projects in the last two decades. With this demonstrated record of successful performance on your projects, we bring an understanding of local conditions, priorities, regulations, and agencies, as well as your preferred methods of project delivery and standards of quality. Just as important, we have the technical expertise and the professional experience gained from our work on these projects that ensure efficiency in addressing key challenges that affect success. Our core team members, based in our Naples office, bring familiarity with County transportation conditions and challenges, as well as established relationships with Collier MPO and County staff, local agencies, and consultants / contractors. These team members, supported by our Florida network of specialty expertise, offer the Collier MPO substantial credentials and experience in transportation studies, planning, and design for projects of similar type, size, and complexity. As shown in our organization chart, our team is organized under the leadership of our Project Manager, Bill Gramer PE, AICP. As the single point of contact for Collier MPO, Bill will be responsible for each assignment, ensuring efficient, organized, and timely completion of projects in accordance with schedule, budget, and quality requirements. Having served as project manager / project coordinator for more than 30 Collier MPO and Collier County general service contracts, Bill has exceptional insight into local conditions, clients, and agencies. In addition, our Florida-based staff routinely work together, bringing lessons learned and the capability to proactively address challenges that can affect project success. As described in this section, many of our staff are people you know—the same professionals who are working on current projects and have delivered past projects for the Collier MPO and Collier County. Subconsultants Traf-O-Data Corp. (DBE) Traf-O-Data, established in 1999, provides transportation planning and traffic engineering services throughout Florida. With more than 100 years of combined experience in transportation planning, Traf-O-Data has particular expertise in the area of Transit and Highway Travel Demand Model development and application. Traf-O- Data staff have delivered projects including Long- Range Transportation Plans, Travel Demand Model Development and Application, Alternatives Analysis Our locally-based team has a proven history of delivering practical solutions to complex challenges faced by clients in Southwest Florida and will bring this practical, hands-on experience to your projects. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services 1-2 Criterion 1: Ability of Professional Personnel Studies, Traffic Microsimulation, Traffic Impact Studies, Multi-modal Masterplans, Transit Studies, and Project Traffic Reports. Jacobs and Traf-O-Data have collaborated on numerous projects in Southwest Florida, including the Oil Well Road and Golden Gate projects in Collier County and FDOT District One Traffic Modeling and General Planning Consultant tasks. Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Alta Planning + Design is a leading multi-modal transportation firm that specializes in the planning, design, engineering, and implementation of bicycle, pedestrian, greenway, park, and trail corridors and systems. Alta recently completed the Cape Coral Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, which was a comprehensive look at a range of strategies, which resulted in recommendations for a comprehensive set of infrastructure improvements, policy changes, and programs to increase the safety, convenience, and enjoyment of bicycling, walking, and riding transit in Cape Coral. Alta worked with Jacobs on the Cape Coral Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, as well as the Winkler Canal Shared-Use Path Feasibility Study and the John Yarbrough Linear Park Feasibility Study, both for the City of Fort Myers, Florida. Cella Molnar & Associates (DBE) Cella Molnar is a Ft. Myers-based DBE firm that provides professional consulting services in all aspects of public involvement, project management, and event planning to clients in Southwest Florida. Over the past 20 years, Cella Molnar has conducted over 150 successful public involvement and outreach programs for transportation and utility projects. The firm is unique in the public information industry because of their specific in-depth technical expertise in transportation and utility planning, design, and construction. Kris Cella has provided public outreach services on numerous Southwest Florida roadway projects including the Winkler Canal Shared-Use Path Feasibility Study and the John Yarbrough Linear Park Feasibility Study, both for the City of Ft. Myers, Florida. Spikowski Planning Associates Spikowski Planning Associates (SPA) is a consulting firm specializing in comprehensive planning, community plans, redevelopment plans, and preparation of land development regulations. In addition to Firm Principal, Bill Spikowski’s 25 years of experience with SPA, he also brings to this contract a “clients view” based on nearly 10 years of work in progressive positions for the Lee County government. Bill has worked with Jacobs on several projects for the Collier MPO and Lee County MPO including the Collier 2045 LRTP, Lee County 2040 LRTP, Lee County Land-Use Scenarios Project, and the Lee County Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Rail Project. Local, Experienced Personnel Committed to Project Success The personnel who have committed to working on Collier County’s MPO contract bring a broad base of expertise and familiarity with Southwest Florida. You can count on us to bring the technical experience, strong team synergy, fine-tuned methodology and tools, lessons learned, and best practices to streamline the implementation of project(s) assigned under this contract. In this section, we provide brief overviews of our proposed personnel and their exceptional qualifications to serve you under this contract. Resumes for all key team members shown on our team’s organization chart can be found at the back of this submittal. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 1-3 Criterion 1: Ability of Professional Personnel 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 1-4 Criterion 1: Ability of Professional Personnel Bill Gramer, PE, AICP, is experienced in a wide variety of transportation and transit projects, including planning, traffic, roadway, drainage, utility, environmental, minor “local” roadways, major urban arterials, state route, and interstate highways. He has served as project manager and/or project coordinator for 45 different General Service Contracts for clients throughout Florida. Bill has expertise in project management, roadway/transit studies and design, bicycle and pedestrian plans (designed more than 100 miles of sidewalks/ pathways/bicycle lanes), design-build criteria packages, underground utility design/ relocations, PD&E studies and community outreach. He has also managed over 40 public involvement meetings and 100+ project stakeholder meetings. Jason Bird is Jacobs’ Florida Resilience and Water Resources Practice Leader. He is a seasoned civil engineering professional with experience in commercial, residential, public open space, utility, stormwater, and transportation projects from feasibility studies to conceptual planning, through design, permitting, and construction administration. He focuses on water resources, water conservation, infrastructure assessment, green infrastructure and sustainability, including LEED, ENVISION evaluations. Jason has applied his knowledge of infrastructure design and climate science to risk and vulnerability evaluations to develop and prioritize mitigation measures and adaptive strategies to protect and enhance capital investment and the overall resilience of built and natural assets. He developed the Interactive Vulnerability Assessment Tool for Miami Beach and is currently providing analysis of system and process vulnerabilities and recommendations for water and wastewater facilities for Jacksonville Electric Authority. Sunserea Dalton, PE, has 16 years of transportation planning and PD&E study experience in project management/ technical coordination for multimodal corridors and environmental assessments on over 15 major transportation studies. She has expertise in providing hands-on technical management, interagency coordination, and delivery of quality documents for major expressways, highways, and rail corridors to ensure ultimate corridor needs are thoroughly considered by all stakeholders. Her recent experience includes the Office of Systems Management and Florida’s Strategic Intermodal System Planning Office on Planning Initiatives and Studies. Jessica Dean, PE, is a transportation planner/ engineer with 15 years of experience in transit, PD&E, and transportation planning. Among her areas of expertise are freight planning, transit safety/security certification, policy planning, public involvement, design plan audits, and bicycle/ pedestrian planning. She is skilled in traffic study reviews and long-range transportation planning. Glenn Dombrowski is one of the early pioneers of the use of 3D computer modeling, animation, and video production within the engineering and architectural industry. He applies close to 30 years of experience to our projects. Since 1982, he has worked on a multitude of municipal, recreational, residential, and commercial projects. Glenn’s animations/video productions have been shown in corporate boardrooms throughout the world, on network and public television, and at the White House. A notable production was a 3D computer animation created as a result of Superstorm Sandy for PBS NOVA’s “Megastorm Aftermath” showing the design for the NYC Outer Harbor Gateway Storm Barrier. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 1-5 Criterion 1: Ability of Professional Personnel Ana Elias, PhD, PE, PTOE, has more than 28 years of experience in transportation planning, computer modeling and simulation, traffic engineering, and transportation economy. She has extensive project experience in traffic modeling, most notably the FDOT traffic model used by District 1 (D1RPM). Herr recent experience includes Task Work Order Lead for FDOT District 4’s District-wide Urban Model Application Support and as Project Manager and Technical Director for the Demand Forecast Model Development and Application, General Planning Consultant (Districtwide). Juan Flores has over 17 years of transportation planning and public/private experience working in the U.S. (Southeast and Northeast), Mexican, and South American markets within supply chains, seaports/waterways, and Class I and II freight rail. His responsibilities include developing the modal transportation business strategies to support the Southeast transportation market sector. He specifically works with state and county governments to develop planning, policy, and operating procedures to meet the needs of both government and industry including FDOT Central Office, and Districts 1, 5, and 6. He recently worked with the Miami-Dade MPO on the SR 953/ LeJeune Road at SR 90/SW 8th Street Intersection Improvement Study and the Miami-Dade TPO on the Strategies for the Integration of Sustainability and Transportation System project. Rick Gorsira, PE, is experienced in ecological assessments, stormwater, surface water, groundwater, wetland delineation, sediment sampling design, and wildlife assessments. He has expertise monitoring wellfield withdrawal impacts on wetland hydrology and other water supply projects. Rick has extensive experience in aerial photo-interpretation, hydroperiod assessments, water supply and reuse water recharge applications, and ERP permitting of water supply projects throughout Florida. Rob Grubel, is a traffic engineer skilled in numerous state-of-the-industry modeling tools. His skills extend to modeling, analyzing, and analyzing numerous traffic scenarios. He was responsible for updating the Southeast Regional Planning Model (SERPM) version 6.5 network to include project Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) and mixed-use land use data. He has worked throughout the state of Florida most recently on the Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study and Collier County 2045 LRTP for Collier County. Jonathon Heiss, GISP, specializes in environmental impact assessment and documentation for transportation and transit projects, as well as compliance with NEPA Environmental Policy Act-related policies and procedures. He is skilled in environmental permit applications and permit compliance oversight, attending and participating in various project meetings; developing and continually updating the project environmental compliance tracking database; ensuring environmental permit compliance with field inspections; and utilizing GIS software to review contractor deliverables. His work ranges throughout the east coast, southern, midwest, and west coast. He is exceptionally proficiency in incorporating project environmentally-related geospatial data into an existing geodatabase. Tara Jones, PE, has 21 years of experience focused on highway and bridge PD&E studies, and corridor studies, many of which have involved extensive community impact assessments. She has expertise in developing Environmental Impact Statements, Environmental Assessments, and Categorical Exclusions as well as developing Section 4(f) and Section 106 evaluations. She is skilled in developing public involvement, community awareness, and project environmental services. She has managed or served as deputy project manager for most of Jacobs’ PD&E studies in Florida. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 1-6 Criterion 1: Ability of Professional Personnel Robert Paquin, PE, is a civil engineer focused on systemic safety planning and analyses that utilize mapping tools and spreadsheets to perform calculations. He accomplishes studies that contrast before and after scenarios of vehicle travel times, capacity, and property access by means of field reviews, time trials and micro- and macroscopic modeling software. He served as Lead Analyst for the Lee County MPO Pedestrian Bicycle Safety Analysis and the Systemic Safety Approach Plan for the Seminole Tribe of Florida. Avi Patwardhan, PhD, is Managing Director of Jacobs’ Smart Cities Practice. With 30 years of problem-solving, systematic thinking, and delivering high-quality results using best-in-class collaborative style. Experience for 50+ clients in North America and overseas—both in the public (local, state, and federal) and private sectors, Dr. Patwardhan has a passion is spotlighting how emerging technologies are impacting cities, utilities, and organizations as they plan, build, and manage infrastructure assets. He uses time-honored best practices and cutting-edge technologies from different business sectors and geographies around the globe. Dr. Patwardhan has spent his career identifying efforts to dramatically improve the quality of life for hundreds of thousands of people—from smart and connected place transformations, water resource allocation, sustainability planning, economic development, and real time asset management. Chad Polk, PE, has a broad range of experience in Highway Safety Manual methodologies, including safety studies and predictive safety, systemic safety, hot spot, risk-based, and pedestrian/bike analysis, He has broad experience in a variety of highway planning and design projects including crash analysis and safety improvements. He was the Safety Implementation Lead for AASHTO’s Strategic Highway Research Program 2 Implementation and provided technical support for AASHTO’s Highway Safety Manual. Chad served as a safety consultant on numerous projects in Southwest Florida including the Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Study for the Lee County MPO and a Systemic Safety Approach Plan for the Seminole Tribe of Florida. Colleen Ross, PE, has experience on various major transportation projects requiring corridor planning, PD&E/NEPA studies, rail/transit, and transportation planning studies. Her primary tasks include report documentation with expertise in data collection of existing and future conditions, analyses of data, and PD&E/NEPA documentation. She supported the Collier Metropolitan Planning 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Update and Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road Corridor Study; the Colonial Parkway PD&E Study and Immokalee Road (CR 846) at Randall Boulevard Intersection PD&E Study in Collier County for FDOT District One; and the Florida Turnpike Enterprise (FTE). Tom Ross, PE, has more than 29 years of experience in transportation planning, traffic operations, and design experience. He specializes in travel demand forecasting, project traffic reports, interchange justification/ modification reports, preliminary engineering, PD&E studies, traffic operations analysis, master planning, access management, traffic signal design, signal timing, signing and pavement marking plans, and intelligent transportation systems throughout Florida. He is experienced in providing quality review for roadway signing and pavement marking, signals, ITS, and lighting projects. He provided Corridor Modeling Coordination and Traffic Support for District 1’s Port Manatee Connector PD&E Study. Tom has expertise in FDOT planning standards, having managed two cycles of the District 1 General Transportation Planning Consultant contract and three cycles of their District Wide Systems Contract. 90% 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 1-7 Criterion 1: Ability of Professional Personnel Ernest Sackey, PE, is an experienced ITS and traffic engineer with specialized expertise in technical design, maintenance, and operations of ITS and tolling systems, traffic operations center, traffic signal systems, connected and autonomous vehicle systems, and smart systems. Ernest specializes in traffic operations center design, traffic signal systems, traffic engineering, ITS device specification and placement, field deployment of ITS, electrical and telecommunications design, and highway design. He has more than 12 years of experience related to planning for a wide range of transportation improvement projects throughout Florida. Megan Shimko is a public involvement, marketing, and sales professional with demonstrated success in strategic and marketing communications, business development, public and media relations, editorial/ publications management, and technical writing/editing. Megan has served as community engagement lead, responsible for developing and leading strategic growth initiatives in the Midwest region. Susy Torriente is an accomplished organizational strategist with 29 years of local government experience in South Florida. Her strength is breaking down complex issues into manageable solutions, fostering collaboration and directing organizational strategic planning. Her portfolio of departments includes sustainable development (building, planning, zoning, economic development), transportation and mobility, environment and sustainability, public works and capital improvement, housing, and parks. Susy serves as City Resilience Officer for the City of Miami Beach. She spearheaded the planning effort to develop Miami-Dade County’s first sustainability and climate action plan. Ken Wooten, PE, has more than 22 years of progressive experience, specializing in roadway design and planning for interstate highways, interchanges, freeways, intersections, and urban and rural arterial roads. He also holds an Advanced MOT certification. Ken has extensive experience on projects for FDOT throughout Florida and served as the Roadway Design Engineer for the County’s Oil Well Road project. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Criterion 2.Past Performance9.E.6 Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-1 PAST PERFORMANCE Criterion 2 Our proposed team members have a demonstrated record of successful performance on projects requiring similar skills to those outlined in the Collier MPO’s RPS. Many of these team members have provided services for the Collier MPO and Collier County, and bring this understanding of local conditions, priorities, regulations and agencies, as well as your preferred methods of project delivery and standards for quality. Our staff are Florida-based and have routinely worked together delivering projects for the Collier MPO, Collier County, as well as for other Florida clients. Our team’s long history of collaborating on similar projects provides the Collier MPO an integrated approach to successfully completing your projects, on time and within budget. Unparalleled Knowledge of Collier County We bring a thorough understanding of the existing conditions in the County through our decades of experience providing planning, studies, design and construction management services on County projects. Exhibit 2-1 lists a few of these projects. Our past work has consisted of: Roadway Planning, Roadway Designs, Complete Streets, Roundabouts, Intersection Designs, Transportation Planning, Traffic Impact Study Reviews, 100 miles of Sidewalks and Bike Lanes, 40 miles of Pathways, Boardwalk Designs, ADA Survey’s for 400+ County Facilities, Grant Writing (TIGER, Safe Routes to Schools, EECBG), Bridge Designs, Box Culvert Designs, Pedestrian Bridges, Weir Structural Evaluations, 100+ miles of Utility Designs, FDEP Permitting, Drainage Design, SFWMD Permitting, Environmental Surveys (T&E species, wetlands, contamination), USACE Permitting, Consultant Peer Reviews, Pavement Evaluations (1000+ Miles), Developer Contribution Agreement Reviews, Transit Designs (Bus Shelter Design, Bus Stop Design), Site/Civil Plans, Architectural Designs, Facilities Designs (Electrical, Mechanical, HVAC), Landfill Design (Master Planning), Construction Engineering and Inspection and Emergency Response Services. Exhibit 2-1. Services Similar in Type, Size, and Complexity to Your Scope of Services The Jacobs Team brings to this contract a long history of delivering study, planning and design services for South Florida clients, including a broad range of services for the Collier MPO and Collier County •2045 Long Range Transportation Plan - Collier MPO •CAT Park and Ride Study - CAT/Collier MPO •Golden Gate City Walkable Community - Collier MPO •Transportation Planning and Design – Collier County •Transportation Planning Reviews – Collier County •Winning Grant Preparation – Various Clients (Collier, Lee, STOF) and Funding Sources o T.I.G.E.R. Grant Immokalee Complete Streets o T.I.G.E.R. Grant Lee County Complete Streets o Safe Routes to School Grant - Eden Park o Safe Routes to School Grant - Shadowlawn o CDBG Grant - Peters Street •Developer Responsibility Reviews – Collier County •Traffic Impact Study Reviews – Collier County •Bus Stop Design Improvements to Achieve ADA Compliance, Bus Shelter Planning and Design - Collier County PTNE •Lee MPO General Services •Lee County 2040 LRTP - Land Use Scenario Study •Lee County Complete Streets Design Criteria Packages (TIGER Grant) •Lee County Bicycle Pedestrian Safety Action Plan Update •Village of Estero Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan •General Planning Consultant for FIHS - FDOT District 1 •Randall-Immokalee PD&E Study – FDOT District 1 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-2 Criterion 2: Past Performance Relevant Experience in a Broad Range of Services that Mirror the County’s Scope for RPS #18-7432-MP Since 1977, Jacobs has been serving Florida clients under dozens of General Service Contracts, including planning services, as listed in Exhibit 2-2. As a full- service engineering firm with a local office in Naples and 11 other offices in Florida, our team members have had the opportunity to provide many of the services listed in the County’s RPS for Florida clients, including the County. References Client reference forms for projects similar in scope to the County’s potential services can be found at the end of this section. Exhibit 2-2. Jacobs’ Experience in Florida for MPOs and Local Governments 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-3 Criterion 2: Past Performance MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Client: Collier MPO Completed: Ongoing The Collier MPO selected Jacobs to prepare their 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The purpose of the plan update is to advance a 20-year planning horizon and to adopt a Cost Feasible Plan (CFP) that encourages and promotes a safe and efficient, multi-modal transportation system that addresses the future year transportation demands. The LRTP will include roadways, public transportation (transit), freight, Bicycle and Pedestrian and multi-use trail facilities. The results of the LRTP process are intended to serve the overall mobility needs of the area while also being cost effective and consistent with national, state and local goals and objectives. The 2045 LRTP will address national performance measures and state-adopted (FDOT) performance targets. The 2045 LRTP will also address the effects of climate change and autonomous connected electric vehicle shared mobility (ACES). The project will be completed by the December 2020. Services include: project management, systems planning, traffic modeling, demographic forecasting, scenario planning, transportation capital, operating and maintenance cost estimating and public involvement. Golden Gate City Walkable Community Client: Collier MPO Completed: 2019 Jacobs was retained by the Collier MPO to prepare the Golden Gate City Walkable Community Study to develop a prioritized list of sidewalk and pedestrian amenity projects which would promote and enhance walkability, bicycle use, transit use, and social equity throughout the community. The study utilized field data collection, community engagement, quantitative and qualitative technical analyses, and best practices to develop and validate prioritized recommendations for a more walkable, safer, and healthier community. When implemented, the recommendations will result in a community where mobility options, safety, social engagement and a “sense of place” are the foundation of the neighborhood. Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study Client: Collier MPO and CAT Completed: Ongoing The purpose of this study is to identify and develop a standardized methodology for locating, operating, and maintaining possible Park & Ride sites in Collier County. The Jacobs team prepared a public participation plan that identifies the outreach efforts and techniques that will be used to ensure that officials, agencies, local government, interested parties, and the public have an opportunity to participate in the planning process. Concurrent with the public participation plan, the team conducted research on successful park and ride programs throughout the region as well as analyzed the information from stakeholders, existing census and traffic data to define the potential sites. The team identified 27 potential sites that will be evaluated and presented to client. A final study report will be produced that will provide a methodology for CAT’s use for future park and ride projects. The report will also include recommendations of 27 potential sites and improvements to existing sites. Cape Coral Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan, Lee County, FL Client: Lee County, FL The Jacobs planning team was tasked with developing a Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan to guide investments to improve walking and biking conditions, improve safety and spur economic development. The plan included refinement of goals, objectives, policies and performance measures; documentation of existing conditions and performance of a needs assessment; public outreach and stakeholder coordination; design criteria development to guide the design and engineering of facilities; funding analysis to identify how to implement the Plan; project prioritization; and recommendations to guide policies, programs, and projects to improve biking and walking. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-4 Criterion 2: Past Performance Village of Estero Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan, Fort Myers, FL Client: Fort Myers, FL Completed: 2019 Our Jacobs transportation planning team developed the Village’s first-ever Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan. The Team identified facility gaps, coordinated with already- programmed improvements, and recommended new facilities needed to enhance the connectivity and safety of the existing bicycle and pedestrian network. Our work included planning level costs estimates, design guidance, public workshops, potential SUN Trail alignment and coordination with stakeholders and Village Council. The Plan was adopted in May 2019 by the Village. Fort Myers Beach Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan, Town of Fort Myers Beach, FL Client: Fort Myers Beach, FL Jacobs was contracted to develop the Town’s first-ever Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan. Our work involved the identification of facility gaps, review of opportunities for coordination with already-programmed improvements along Estero Boulevard, and recommendations for new facilities that will be needed to enhance the safety of the existing bicycle and pedestrian network. Miscellanous Corridor Studies Client: Collier County Completed: Various Dates Collier Boulevard Alignment Study, Collier County, FL. Jacobs conducted a comprehensive analysis to determine the type, design, and location of proposed future improvements to Collier Boulevard (CR 951) from U.S. 41 to Immokalee Road, a distance of approximately 15 miles. As part of the study, we developed and analyzed various typical sections and roadway geometry; and evaluated drainage and utility adjustment requirements, site constraints, preliminary environmental, and right-of-way requirements for a six-lane urban divided section with bike lanes, sidewalks, and stormwater management facilities. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Corridor Study, Collier County, FL. We completed a corridor study to determine the feasibility of extending Vanderbilt Beach Road east into the Golden Gate Estates area. The corridor study limits were from Collier Boulevard (CR 951) east to DeSoto Boulevard, a length of approximately 10 miles. The initial objective was to identify the existing and future transportation demands along the potential Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension corridor. Extensive right-of-way investigations were performed to determine potential impacts of 15 different corridor alternatives. Coordination with County right-of-way staff and community development was required to create a database of potential future impacts SUNTRAX Client: Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise Completed: Ongoing Jacobs is working with Florida's Turnpike Enterprise on a project for a unique roadway network that includes approximately 8 miles of infield track for the purpose of testing autonomous and connected vehicles. The project will develop a world-class testing facility as a designated US DOT proving ground for AV/CV testing. Tasks include: master planning, creative workshops, focused outreach to determine industry needs for this emerging technology, concept development, architectural planning and programming, site design, and permitting. Future tasks include assistance with RFP development for the facility operator and completion of the design and construction documents in preparation for construction. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-5 Criterion 2: Past Performance Pedestrian Bridge Crossing Feasibility Study - Freedom Park to Gordon River Greenway Park Over Golden Gate Parkway Client: Collier County, FL Completed: 2015 The Collier County Growth Management Department, Transportation Engineering Division initiated a feasibility study for a pedestrian crossing over Golden Gate Parkway in Naples, Florida. The proposed crossing will provide pedestrians with a convenient, safe route to traverse between Freedom Park, located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway and Gordon River Greenway Park, located on the south side of Golden Gate Parkway, just east of Freedom Park. We were contracted to prepare a study to identify potential crossing locations, evaluate pedestrian crossing alternatives, define site constraints (geometry, utilities, environmental), within the project vicinity, and prepare preliminary cost data. The study evaluated a pedestrian overpass bridge, pedestrian underpass tunnel, and an “on- street” crossing pedestrian signal. This report would then be used by the County staff to evaluate crossing options and identify funding needs to advance the project to the next stage. The feasibility study provided a cursory review of the existing conditions and features within the study limits and developed preliminary construction costs for the viable alternatives for budget purposes. Long-Range Land Use Scenario Planning, Lee County Client: Lee County Completed: 2015 Jacobs managed Lee County MPO’s Land Use Scenario Study to develop alternative land use scenarios for the purpose of selecting a preferred scenario to use for the Lee County’s 2040 LRTP update. Following in the footsteps of national trends and Federal Highway Administration endorsement of the scenario planning process, the Lee County MPO scenario planning is an analytical process that assesses the strengths and weaknesses of alternative futures that can help transportation planners prepare for changes in land use and demographics. Sprawling communities generally require an automobile dependent transportation system where residents travel longer distances to reach destinations. The Lee County MPO and its citizens hope to reduce or shorten vehicle trips and increase mobility choices. The goal of the land use study was to coordinate transportation and land use factors to develop a sustainable long-term scenario for the County that will lower vehicle miles traveled (VMT), reduce suburban sprawl, and make the best use of future transit expansions. Identifying future land use scenarios allowed the MPO and citizens of Lee County to evaluate the costs and benefits. At the end of this process, the MPO Board unanimously selected the preferred land use scenario, which encourages in-fill development and opportunities for a future multi-modal system and approved the Study. This approval allowed the socio-economic data projections for year 2040 to be used in the 2040 LRTP. “I have never before heard such high praise in public for the work (Land Use Scenario Project) of a consultant group. Not only for the high quality of the work product, but especially for the transparency and interactive process used that encouraged such involvement by stakeholders and other interested parties...There is so much more Cape Coral staff and council members and the public can learn from your model process.” STEVE CHUPACK, CAPE CORAL 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-6 Criterion 2: Past Performance John Yarbrough Linear Park (JYLP) Shared-Use Path Feasibility Study Client: City of Fort Myers Completed: 2018 Jacobs prepared a study for the City of Fort Myers to determine the feasibility of a 12-foot-wide path extending the JYLP, which is part of the SUN Trail system. The feasibility study was funded by FDOT. We performed a feasibility analysis and identified right-of-way impacts; concept design; safety, security and maintenance issues; environmental issues; permitting requirements; and Section 4(f) impacts related to development of a shared-use path. We provided conceptual design and development services that identified bicycle and pedestrian connectivity opportunities in the existing neighborhood and bike and pedestrian facilities and developed alternatives and final design concepts for the pathway or alternatives that ensure safety, security, and maintenance. We collaborated with City, Lee County MPO, FDOT, stakeholders, and the public. Charlotte County-Punta Gorda 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Client: Charlotte County Completed: 2015 Jacobs successfully completed the MPO’s 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. The LRTP sets forth a vision to address the transportation system needs through cost-feasible improvements in Charlotte County over the next 25 years. The multi- modal plan documented in this report outlines highways, public transportation (transit), freight, and bicycle, pedestrian, and multi-use trail facilities. Services our team provided included multi-modal systems planning, demographic forecasting and scenario planning, and transportation capital, operating, and maintenance cost estimating. We initiated a public engagement program to reach out to stakeholders, agency representatives, elected officials, and the community during the update. Public engagement efforts included production of public-friendly materials, stakeholder and agency staff coordination, and public workshops and meetings. LAP Projects – Sidewalks Client: Collier County Completed: Ongoing Golden Gate Collector Sidewalk LAP Project. This project includes design of construction plans, specifications, and cost estimating services for the construction of a 6-foot wide sidewalk on the south side of Golden Gate Parkway, as well as the construction of a 6-foot wide sidewalk on the west side of Santa Barbara Blvd. Associated improvements include signing and pavement marking, driveway apron improvements, adjustment of existing utilities, and drainage improvements. Along Santa Barbara Blvd., between Copper Leaf Lane and Cedar Tree Lane, pedestrian safety has been improved with cross-walks and detectable warning surfaces at each intersection, as well as bus bays for each transit stop. Along Golden Gate Blvd., pedestrian safety has been improved by resurfacing driveways and connecting to the existing sidewalk at Tropicana Blvd. The sidewalks are designed in accordance with current FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards. Additional responsibilities include preparation of quantities, coordination with Collier County, and quality assurance and quality control plans. Sunshine Boulevard Sidewalks and Pedestrian Bridge Relocation LAP Project. This project includes design of construction plans, specifications, and cost estimating services for the construction of a 6-foot wide sidewalk on the west side of Sunshine Boulevard from 100 feet south of 17th Avenue SW to Green Boulevard (approximately 845 LF) and the relocation of an existing pedestrian bridge over Green Canal. Sunshine Blvd. associated improvements include, drainage improvements, adjustment of existing utilities, driveway apron improvements, erosion control, and pedestrian safety improvements to both the Green Blvd. and 17th Avenue SW intersections along Sunshine Blvd. The sidewalk is designed in accordance with current Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards. Additional responsibilities included preparation of quantities, coordination with Collier County, quality assurance and quality control plans, field inspection of existing bridge during magnetic particle testing, and coordination with SFWMD for maintenance of canal and relocation of an existing boat ramp. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-7 Criterion 2: Past Performance East Cass and East Taylor “Green Spine” Project, Hillsborough County Client: Hillsborough County Completed: 2015 The project consisted of converting East Cass Street and East Tyler Street from one-way streets into two-way streets. As part of the overall improvements, a barrier-separated cycle track was added along East Cass Street to Nebraska Avenue. The cycle track was built with the highest safety standards, including a stop bar on the pavement at each intersection, green pavement markings at high safety zones such as driveways, and a signal at each intersection. The cycle track is only the second of its kind in Florida. These converted streets helped restore the street grid in downtown, improved local access, and transformed Cass Street into a central spine, as outlined in the Invision Tampa Center City Plan. Total cost for the two-way conversion and cycle track was $9.86 million, with funding coming from the Local Option Gas Tax for design and Commercial Paper Program for construction. This was the City’s first barrier-separated cycle path. This project was located in the center of a heavily traveled urban area. Our team developed a phased plan to ensure that construction did not impact daily operations of the traveling public or local businesses. At the Hillsborough County Planning Commission’s 34th Annual Planning and Design awards in 2016, the Cass and Tyler Streets One-way to Two-way Conversion with a Two-way Cycle Track and Share-the-Road Bicycle Facilities project received an Award of Excellence. Judges noted, “Taking Tampa’s investment to the next level, state-of-the-art facilities and innovations like the activated signals foster a better sense of place for Downtown and will foster continued economic growth.” Tampa Bay Regional Transportation Master Plan Client: Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority Jacobs supported the Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA) in meeting a legislated mandate of an adopted Regional Transportation Master Plan. FDOT District Seven funded this project, which examined regional transit and toll facility needs while ensuring the movement of passengers and freight for the seven-county area of Citrus, Hernando, Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, and Sarasota Counties. The TBARTA Regional Transportation Master Plan identified a vision for corridor and mode options to meet regional travel demands within a 25-year planning horizon. The Plan incorporated regional roads, regional transit, freight modes, waterborne transportation, transportation demand management, multi-use trails, and air quality. As part of the Master Plan development process, our team convened TBARTA’s Land Use Working Group. The group opened a dialogue about coordinated regional policy approaches to land use in relation to transportation investment choices. The group also created a resource guide for promoting Transit Oriented Development (TOD), a complete and extensive toolbox of tools and strategies to help interested communities throughout the TBARTA region better understand and prepare for TOD, thereby enabling the region to better compete for FTA Capital Investment Grant funds. Public and agency engagement was broad based and intensive, with over 400,000 participants in the regional transportation conversation. The Plan was adopted ahead of schedule in 2009 and our Planning team subsequently led three minor updates to the plan, in 2011, 2013, and 2015. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-8 Criterion 2: Past Performance Sustainability, Resiliency & Climate Change Jacobs is a leader in sustainability and environment, health, and safety (EHS) compliance. We combine a deep knowledge of our clients’ industries and processes with global resources and knowledge gained from decades of supporting environmental site assessments, auditing, compliance, air quality and acoustics analysis, integrated waste solutions, and more recently climate change, sustainability and resiliency strategies and geospatial/environmental data management solutions. Our Florida experience has resulted in successful local projects, built to receive award winning accolades from organizations that will put the County on a national level. Green designs attract investment dollars and are well- accepted by the public. The vulnerability of coastal communities and infrastructure has been starkly exposed in recent years through the devastation caused by numerous coastal storms. Climate change means that we will face higher sea levels and more frequent storms in the future. The social, economic and environmental consequences of these storms, and the repeat nature of many of the impacts, has generated significant scientific and public debate over the sustainability of our current approaches to coastal risk management and floodplain analysis. The combination of man-made and natural problems at our coasts requires a considered approach to management. Reactive, local approaches to addressing coastal impacts and flooding as they arise is a recipe for increased losses to infrastructure. If we take a step back, think about our long-term objectives and look to work with nature where possible, we have the potential to stop our management responses themselves being part of the problem. This thinking is in line with the National Research Council (2014) which, after reviewing current approaches, suggested a more coordinated, strategic, longer-term vision. JEA Resiliency Program Client: Jacksonville Electric Authority, FL Completed: Ongoing Jacobs is developing develop the framework to resiliency for Jacksonville Electric Authority’s (JEA) water and wastewater systems, and provide program management, engineering, and design services to improve the reliability and resiliency of its water, wastewater, reclaimed water, and chilled water systems during extreme weather events. To address the uncertainty of future climate, JEA is preparing a System Resiliency Plan to further advance its water and wastewater systems toward the goal of being a benchmark resilient utility. This System Resiliency Plan will provide the enhanced design standards and forward‐looking adaptation strategies that will allow JEA to maintain a high level of service (LOS) and minimize system interruptions during extreme weather events. The JEA Resiliency Program outlines the resiliency framework for JEA’s water and wastewater systems to withstand extreme weather events. A comprehensive adaptation plan focused on risk reduction, aggressive design standards, and forward‐looking capital improvement plan (CIP) investment will further advance JEA’s system reliability and resilience. The first task order is to prepare the System Resiliency Plan, which serves as a roadmap to success guiding JEA’s continued resilience investment. This plan will provide a concise, easy to follow approach to reducing climate risk and enhancing system reliability and operational continuity. The Task order includes: • System Resiliency Plan Framework and Goal Setting Workshop • Data Collection and Review • Establish Existing and Future Extreme Weather Scenarios • Vulnerability Assessment • Risk Analysis • Mitigation and Adaptation Strategy Development • Economic Impact and Benefit-Cost Analysis • Industry Best Practice / Benchmark Assessment • Design and Construction Standards • Strategy Prioritization and Project Definitions 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-9 Criterion 2: Past Performance Wet Weather Overflow Mitigation Program – Phase I & II Client: City of St. Petersburg, FL Completed: 2018 Under the City’s Wet Weather Overflow Mitigation Program that was established to address sewer overflows due to extreme weather, Jacobs was contracted to identify the most cost-effective solution to mitigate potential future wet weather overflows from the City’s collection system and three Water Reclamation Facilities (WRFs). This program was implemented in two phases. Under Phase I, Jacobs used the data available at the time to perform a holistic assessment of the City's wastewater infrastructure and to develop and compare infrastructure alternatives to achieve overflow mitigation. Alternatives included removal of infiltration and inflow (I/I) from the collection system, improvements at the WRFs, such as expansion of hydraulic capacity implementation of wet weather treatment at the WRFs or an increase in storage and injection well disposal capacity, or some combination of these alternatives. To support the alternatives analysis, current levels of I/I in the collection system were estimated using WRF inflow data, and budgetary cost curves were developed for increasing levels of I/I removal compared to increasing levels of conveyance and treatment capacity. The Phase I study concluded that improvements to the WRFs are the most cost-effective solution to mitigating potential future overflows and that collection system rehabilitation for I/I removal should be performed system-wide to reduce wet weather flows, ensuring wet weather flows do not increase over time. Phase II consisted of a large-scale flow monitoring effort, update of the collection system model, a capacity analysis of the collection system, and prioritization of sewer basins for removal of I/I. Stormwater Management Master Plan Update Client: City of St. Petersburg, FL Completed: Ongoing The City of St. Petersburg contains a 62-square mile watershed. Phase 1 of the project that involves updating the hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of Basin C is substantially complete. During the Phase I, the Basin C existing condition model was updated using the most up to date ERP/As-built information, City land use maps, field reconnaissance. Watershed model parameterization was completed, and an updated model was developed. Accounting for sea level rise and changes in rainfall, a future conditions model is also being developed. Sea level rise projections recommended by the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council were used to update future coastal water conditions and rainfall volume projections were estimated using historical data. Future conditions were developed for the year 2070 to account for typical asset life spans. A critical storm analysis was conducted to identify the level of service at a roads and sub-basin scale. The results of the critical storm analysis, along with the institutional knowledge of the City staff will be used to identify the areas of concerns for BMP Alternative Analysis. The BMP alternative analysis will look at the flood reduction projects that will be sustainable and resilient to the 2070 future conditions. Phase II of the project will include updating the entire City of St. Petersburg watershed, including 26 separate basins. Phase II will include watershed evaluation, model development, floodplain analysis, and alternative analysis tasks. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-10 Criterion 2: Past Performance In addition to the projects described above, Jacobs has delivered services for Collier County and Lee County, including: Miscellaneous Collier County Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering Services • Developer Responsibility Reviews (2010-2020 • Transportation Planning Design/Reviews (2010-2020) • Traffic Impact Study (2010-2020) • PUD Monitoring • Traffic Analysis • DRI Monitoring • Collier County Access Management Policy Update • Collier County LOS Update • Planning Project Management Assistance • Drainage Modeling • Plans Review • Project Estimating • Staff Augmentation • Livingston Road E-W Conceptual Planning • Collier Boulevard Alignment Study • Woodcrest Road Alignment Study • Immokalee Road/Randall Blvd. Intersection Planning • Immokalee Rd./ Collier Blvd. Intersection Expansion • Grant Assistance - Researched and prepared twenty-five (29) grant applications for Collier County Facilities, Transportation Planning, and Parks and Recreation Departments Specific projects include the following: Master Mobility Plan Application Preparation and Phase I Services. We worked with County Planning staff to prepare the Master Mobility Plan (MMP) Grant Application which received a $472,799 Department of Energy Grant for the Phase I MMP Project. In addition, we successfully performed planning and engineering services as part of the MMP Phase I Project. We were responsible for the data collection, existing infrastructure evaluation, public involvement presentation, Board of Collier County Commissioners Presentation as well as preparing the Project Charter. Analysis and Quality Control Review of AUIR. We verified for each concurrency roadway segment that the data collected was consistent with prior year data, that the proper conversion factor(s) were used and applied appropriately, that the pm peak hour capacity and background volumes were correctly calculated, assessed and applied. Access Management System Update. We were responsible for updating the Access Management System/Standards for Collier County. Tasks performed as part of this assignment included: Review of the County’s Existing Access Management System; Update the Access Management Classification Spreadsheet; Review of Access Management Standards at Intersections; Provide Recommendations for Exceptions, Variances, and Joint Access; Preparation of a Report which documented the findings and recommendations of the study. Update of LOS Maximum Service Volumes for Concurrency Segments. We were responsible for updating the maximum service volumes for concurrency segments identified in the County’s Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). Tasks performed as part of this assignment included: Review and Update of the Existing Files & Procedures; Identification and Summary of Roadway Properties; Collection of Signal Timings and Signal System Information; Collection and Summary of TMC Data; Analysis of Concurrency Segments; Preparation of AUIR Report Roadway Asset Management Database and Project Evaluation. We assisted the County with the field and office review and evaluation of the County Fixed Roadway Asset Management Database. In addition, we prepared a Roadway Asset Management Database and Project Evaluation Report and presentation. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-11 Criterion 2: Past Performance Smart City LED Street Lighting Conversion Client: Miami Beach, FL Completed: 2019 Jacobs is the Project Management and Design Partner for the Design-Build- Operate-Maintain (DBOM) conversion of ~9,000 city lights to an LED smart platform. The goal of this project was to develop an open platform street lighting network capable of integrating other smart city services to enhance energy conservation, public safety and economic development. The first phase of the project is to develop an overall Smart City LED Street Lighting Conversion Master Plan. Elements to be included in the project are Smart parking, traffic management, emergency response, air quality and sound sensors, electric vehicle charging stations, security cameras and citizen engagement. Complete Streets Design Build Criteria Package and Tiger Grant Client: Lee County MPO Completed: 2016 Our team assisted the Lee County MPO in preparing Conceptual Designs (30% Plans) and a Design-Build Criteria Package used for Bidding their USDOT TIGER Grant funded Complete Streets Project. Improvements consisted of adding bike lanes, shoulders, pathways, sidewalks and bus stop facilities. This grant allowed Lee County to fill gaps in their Regional network and link three high priority loops with committed local funding. Our team also assisted the MPO with fast tracking their Federal TIGER Grant Application for the Complete Streets Project within a limited 45-day schedule. The original work order utilized local funding to initiate the grant application and evaluate the feasibility of the submittal. A supplemental work order utilized planning (state) funds allocated in the MPO work program to complete the application. The grant application was awarded for $10.4 million. Immokalee Road at Randall Boulevard Intersection, Efficient Transportation Decision-Making (EDTM) Client: FDOT District 1 Completed: 2019 The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), District One initiated a Project Development and Environment (PD&E) study to evaluate proposed improvements at the intersection of Immokalee Road (County Road (CR) 846) and Randall Boulevard (Blvd) in Collier County, Florida. Intersection capacity improvements are needed to accommodate the projected future traffic demand. This PD&E study involves the preparation of a Categorical Exclusion (to be determined) for potential interim at-grade intersection improvement and ultimate grade-separated interchange improvements to meet future travel demand. An Initial Alternatives Technical Memorandum was prepared to document the need for the project, the development of intersection improvement alternatives, and a preliminary comparative evaluation based on engineering constraints, environmental effects and preliminary cost estimates. Constraints included minimizing impacts to canals, access, utilities and right-of-way. Proposed alternatives include at-grade alternatives and grade-separated alternatives to increase the intersection capacity. The results of this study focused on the following key elements: • Intersection improvements were designed to increase regional transportation network connectivity, reduce crashes, and subsequently, improve the safety of the roadway • Developed means to improve operations on existing evacuation routes • Expanded multi-modal access to pedestrian and bicycle traffic in the area. I-75 PD&E Study Traffic Operations Analysis, Sarasota and Manatee Counties, FL Client: FDOT District 1 This PD&E study was conducted along I-75 from SR 681 to north of University Parkway in Sarasota and Manatee counties. The proposed improvements evaluated included basic capacity improvements (widening to 8- or 10-lanes) and interchange modifications to accommodate projected traffic increases. The traffic operations analysis for the Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) alternatives at University Parkway and I-75 and at Clark Road and I-75 was performed using VISSIM microsimulation software due to the complex geometric configuration and signalization associated with the DDI alternatives. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-12 Criterion 2: Past Performance District-wide Urban Model Application Support, FDOT District 4 Client: FDOT District 4 Jacobs assisted the FDOT Systems Planning staff with applying the Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA)/Mesoscopic tool. The state-of-the-art DTA tool applies Cube Avenue in the modeling of the Southeast Regional Planning Model (SERPM). Currently, the DTA tool is being updated for use with the latest SERPM 7 Activity-Based Model in the modeling of managed lanes. Tasks performed to-date include subarea identification and network preparation, traffic data analysis, demand estimation, DTA tool calibration and validation, and a static versus dynamic assignment test. Wekiva Parkway/SR 46 Realignment PD&E Study, Traffic Operations, Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX), Orange, Lake and Seminole Counties, FL Client: Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX) Jacobs provided corridor transportation planning and traffic engineering services for this corridor analysis of a 26-mile limited-access toll facility (four lanes, expandable to six lanes) on new alignment that will complete the Western Beltway around the metropolitan Orlando area. Our responsibilities included corridor-wide concept design input based on traffic operations and coordinating production of an Interchange Modification Report (IMR) for modified I-4/Wekiva Parkway system-system interchange. HEFT (SR 821) Widening and Express Lanes from SR 836 to NW 106th Street, Miami, FL Client: Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise Jacobs is the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Design Engineer for the construction of Express Lanes on Florida’s Turnpike. This project will widen the Turnpike HEFT between SR 836 to NW 106th Street from six to ten lanes with the additional four lanes (two in each direction) being operated as Express Lanes. The project will include the design for installation of fiber optic cable communication, CCTV cameras, Dynamic Message Signs, Toll Rate Dynamic Message Signs, Vehicle Detection System and a Travel Time System. Districtwide Systems Planning Consultant Client: FDOT District 1 Jacobs managed project traffic reports, FSUTMS modeling, and traffic impact study reviews. Tasks include updating transportation forecasting model validations, review of transportation impact studies for growth management in rural counties, and developing the future year transportation plan updates for the year 2035 for DeSoto and Hardee counties. General Transportation Planning Consultant Client: FDOT District 1 Under this contract, Jacobs provided a wide range of services including project traffic reports, FSUTMS modeling, a transportation systems management study for a SIS connector facility, development of a Systems Interchange Modification Report for an eight mile segment of I-75 in Lee County, development of a Corridor Access Management Plan, development of project traffic report of a 7-mile segment of US 41 in Charlotte County, including multiple phased intersection improvements, and multiple project traffic report reviews. I-4 Systems Access Modification Report, FDOT District 5, Osceola, Orange, Seminole and Volusia Counties, FL Client: FDOT District 5 Jacobs provided transportation planning services for the development of a Systems Modification Report (SAMR) for a 73-mile portion of I-4 in Central Florida. The SAMR provided the traffic operations analyses, evaluation and comparison of alternatives and documentation required to justify the proposed access modifications identified by three concurrent PD&E studies conducted along I-4. Overall, the projects involved the addition of two new interchanges, modifications to 34 existing interchanges, and the addition of 10 special use direct access locations. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-13 Criterion 2: Past Performance Demand Forecast Model Development and Application, General Planning Consultant (Districtwide) Client: FDOT District 4 Jacobs provided professional planning services in developing and applying travel demand forecasting models for the District’s Planning and Environmental Management Office, with tasks that range in depth from simple, straightforward applications of existing model(s) to highly-technical, research-oriented assignments in other occasions. The primary tasks included, but were limited to, analyzed census and other demographic data, analyzed travel characteristics, updated network physical and operational attributes, enhanced transportation demand forecast and land use forecast processes in response to policy or natural changes, implemented model calibration standards, and developed Geographic Information System (GIS) data and applications to support modeling. Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) Mesoscopic Model Client: FDOT District 4 Jacobs served as the principal model developer with the FDOT in development, testing, and improvement of a state-of-the-art mesoscopic tool application directly compatible with the Southeast Florida Regional Planning Model (SERPM). SERPM networks and origin-destination matrices (further subdivided into six 30-minute trip tables per peak period) are input into the application for more-detailed subarea mesoscopic simulation using dynamic traffic assignment (DTA). This tool was developed using the Florida FSTUMS travel demand model standards and Cube software package. Miscellaneous Roadway Design Projects Client: Collier County, FL Oil Well Road Widening and Reconstruction. This project involved the design and permitting for the widening and reconstruction of 11.1 miles of Oil Well Road from Immokalee Road to east of Camp Keais Road. The project scope included widening a two-lane rural section to a four-lane and six-lane urban section. Our team provided a bridge design report, design, and plans for three bridge replacements, two box culvert extensions, and miscellaneous structures. All three bridge replacements involved three-span AASHTO Type II beam superstructures on conventional pile bents. The bridge lengths are 132 feet, 135 feet, and 150 feet respectively. We performed foundation design and coordinated all the other aspects of the design including QA. Our team also performed Load Rating using LRFR for box culvert classified as bridge culvert. The project included extensive public involvement due to impacts to environmentally sensitive areas as well as heavily developed sections of the corridor. The permitting effort included drainage and environmental impacts as well as wildlife crossings for endangered species such as the Florida Panther. Vanderbilt Beach Road (Airport-Pulling to Collier) Design. Managed the widening of 5.5 miles of the existing 2-lane roadway to a 6-lane, urban divided roadway. Project required extensive attention to public concerns regarding local access, circulation, traffic demands, impacts to businesses and residential areas, and aesthetics. Services provided included public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting (SFWMD, USACE, FDEP), maintenance of traffic, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Design (Collier to Desoto). Managed design of new 10 mile, 6-lane roadway. Responsibilities included providing public involvement, roadway, drainage, permitting, maintenance of traffic, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Immokalee Road (Collier to 43rd) Design. Managing this design project that involved the 8.1-mile widening from two to six lanes (initial construction of four), thereby converting the existing rural section to an urban section. Services provided included complete roadway design, permitting (SFWMD, USACE, FDEP), drainage design, wetland mitigation, 8 miles of water main design and force main design, signal design, roadway lighting, traffic studies, and services during construction. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-14 Criterion 2: Past Performance Pine Ridge Road (Airport-Pulling to Logan) Design. Managed the design for widening Pine Ridge Road from four to six lanes converting the existing rural section to an urban section. The 3.3-mile project included widening Pine Ridge Road through the I-75 interchange. Unique aspect of the project was the redesign of the northbound on and off-ramps to accommodate dual left turn lanes. Services included complete roadway design and permitting services, signal design, roadway lighting, landscaping, traffic studies, and services during construction. Collier Boulevard III (Golden Gate Canal to Golden Gate Boulevard). Managed the widening of 4 miles of the existing four-lane, urban divided roadway. Tasks included public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting (SFWMD, USACE, FDEP), maintenance of traffic, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Collier Boulevard III (US 41 to Davis) Design. Managed development of design plans and specifications for widening the existing 4-lane roadway to a 6-lane facility, including four major intersections, for roadway capacity improvements to a 7-mile segment. Also coordinated SFWMD, USACE and FDEP permits. Collier Boulevard III (US 41 to Davis) Design. Managed development of design plans and specifications for widening the existing 4-lane roadway to a 6-lane facility, including four major intersections, for roadway capacity improvements to a 7-mile segment. Also coordinated SFWMD, USACE and FDEP permits Collier Boulevard I (CR951) (Golden Gate to Immokalee) Design. Managed this 3-mile corridor that involved widening existing 2-lane roadway to a 6-lane, urban divided roadway. Project required extensive attention to public concerns regarding local access, circulation, traffic demands, impacts to businesses and residential areas, and aesthetics. Services included public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting (SFWMD, USACE, FDEP), maintenance of traffic, structural design, environmental impacts, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Tree Farm Road Phase II (Davila St. to Woodcrest Dr.) Design. Design for the half-mile segment of Tree Farm Road. This 2-lane roadway section links four (4) roadways with a new roundabout. The project consists of a new 2-lane new roadway with sidewalks, pathways, bike lanes and a new roundabout. The project included water main and force main design and permitting. The project utilized three adjacent development ponds for stormwater treatment and attenuation. (Permits: SFWMD, ACOE FDEP). Immoklee Road – Collier Boulevard Intersection Improvements Client: Collier County, FL Completed: 2017 The project consisted of improvements to the Immokalee Road - Collier Boulevard Intersection to provide additional capacity (triple-lefts) to the intersection and extend Collier Blvd north approximately one-half mile. Services included: roadway alternatives analysis, roadway design, drainage design, sidewalks, bike lanes, pathways, Cocohatchee Canal Relocation (ACOE N.W. Permitting), pre-fabricated bridge crossing of Cocohatchee Canal, CR951 box culvert extension, signalization, lighting, utility design (36 inch water main, 30 inch water main (42 inch - 540 LF directional drill), 16 Inch force main, 24 inch reclaimed water main), Coordination with FPL for relocation of transmission and distribution lines. Permitting: SFWMD, ACOE FDEP), boat ramp design, coordination with adjacent developments, NCH Hospital, CVS. SFWMD Permit included onsite treatment and attenuation as well as compensatory storage within adjacent development to minimize costs and maximize treatment. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-15 Criterion 2: Past Performance West Busch Boulevard Corridor Study Client: FDOT District 7 Completed: 2018 The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), District Seven, initiated the West Busch Boulevard Corridor Study to address safety and mobility concerns on the 3.3-mile segment of Busch Boulevard from Dale Mabry Highway to Nebraska Avenue in unincorporated Hillsborough County and the City of Tampa. Vehicular traffic is high along this corridor with average annual daily traffic (AADT) exceeding 50,000. This high number of vehicles regularly mixes with bicycle traffic, pedestrian traffic, multiple bus routes, and access to social services and Chamberlain High School. The goal of the study was to establish a vision for the corridor’s character, explore typical section options, and define a strategy to achieve the stated vision. To realize this goal, FDOT combined engineering analysis with an enhanced public outreach program that included a Project Advisory Group (PAG) of local partner agency representatives, a Public Visioning Workshop, and an Alternatives Public Meeting. This Corridor Alternatives and Strategies Report documents the study process, analysis, and recommendations to meet future traffic demand, accommodate all users, and achieve the corridor vision. General Planning Consultant for FIHS Client: FDOT District 1 Completed: Various Dates Our successful performance merited six contract extensions (three for additional time and three to increase the monetary threshold). Work efforts under this contract included: • Evaluation/Demonstration of the Charlotte County Model. Provided review of the current forecasting model and making short- and long-term recommendations to improve performance. Work products included a technical model evaluation; estimated time/costs to “update” the model based on recommendations; and meetings/presentations to FDOT and Charlotte County staff. • Interchange Evaluations for Daniels Parkway and Immokalee Road Interchanges with I-75, Lee and Collier Counties. Included the evaluation of existing and future-year conditions to determine viable short- term improvements to the interchanges and the analysis of preliminary interchange improvement layouts recommended to provide storage lengths for additional turn lanes. • Update and Evaluation of Central Sarasota Parkway Interchange Modification Report (IMR) Traffic, Sarasota County. Prepared an overall evaluation of the Central Sarasota Parkway IMR traffic for implementation (PD&E) phase. Worked with FDOT District One staff and PD&E consultant (Wilson Miller) in developing future-year traffic projections and assessments which would allow the interchange to progress to design. • I-75 Project Traffic Reports for River Road to SR 72, Sarasota County, and from North of SR 78 to North of River Road, Lee, Charlotte, and Sarasota Counties. Prepared two separate comprehensive traffic reports documenting potential improvements to I-75 for upgrading to a six/eight-lane facility. Project tasks included modeling; trend analyses; development of future-year traffic forecasts; recommendations for K, D, and T factors; comprehensive operational analyses using both HCS and CORSIM; and extensive PD&E coordination. • Evaluation of Interim I-4 Improvements from Kathleen Road to U.S. 98, Polk County. Evaluated operational conditions for the proposed interim connection of I-4 with the ultimate I-4 connection between the Kathleen Road and US 98 interchanges, which included review of traffic forecasts and analyses. • Bartow Bypass (Northern Arterial), Polk County. Completed a feasibility study for a connection from US 98 to US 17 to bypass the US 98/SR 60A intersection. Project included data collection; coordination with local agencies and government; determination of potential travel demand; review specific operational benefits; overall viability assessment; and formal presentation to the Polk Transportation Planning Organization (TPO), Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Citizens Advisory Committees (CAC), and local officials. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-16 Criterion 2: Past Performance Transportation Program Management, Seminole Tribe of Florida Client: Seminole Tribe of Florida Completed: Ongoing Jacobs has provided a myriad of services to the Seminole Tribe of Florida for a variety of assignments similar to those expected as part of this contract.Our team provided Transportation Program Management Services for all six reservations in Florida including Hollywood, Tampa, Big Cypress, Brighton, Fort Pierce and Immokalee. Services included plan review, preparation of LRTP, grant writing, safety audits, asset management, pavement evaluations, cost estimating, bid reviews, budget analysis, safety plan, access management and roadway design, work order preparations, RFP preparation services, FDOT, BIA, FHWA coordination, public involvement and planning. Projects/tasks included: • Long Range Transportation Plan (6 reservations) • Roadway Plan and Estimate Reviews • Reservation-Wide Systemic Safety Analysis • 2014 Infrastructure Analysis Report • Josie Billie Highway Road Safety Audit • Big Cypress Safety Plan • STOF Transportation CIP • TTPSF Safety Funds Grant- Coordinated with Federal Highway Administration (Awarded $360k • Reservation Safety Plan • Accident Database • Indian Reservation Roads (IRR) Inventory Update • Transportation Network Study Miscellaneous Professional Engineering Services for Stormwater & Environmental Services Contract Client: Hillsborough County, FL Completed: 2017 Jacobs (as CH2M) has been providing professional services under an on-call contract that includes the assessment and implementation of drainage improvement projects, project development and evaluations (PD&E), hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, permitting, construction document preparation, cost estimating, and post design services. Jacobs has managed the delivery of several projects under this contract. Recent projects include: East 112nd Ave and North 11th St. Pond Drainage Improvements. Jacobs delivered engineering services for detailed design, construction plans, and permitting services to provide local drainage improvement retrofits for a neighborhood north of Nebraska Avenue and Fowler Avenue in Tampa. The proposed retrofits are part of the Duck Pond Watershed Improvement Program (University Area Community Drainage Improvement Project) to not only alleviate localized and regional flooding, but also to improve water quality. Specific improvements undertaken include the modification of an existing online County stormwater pond, design of a new County stormwater online detention pond, and the installation of new gravity collection system with ditch bottom inlets and local swale grading. The HCSWMM model was reviewed, analyzed and modified to be used as a devision making tool as well as being modified for ERP permitting support. The project also included bidding and construction phase services. Jacobs reviewed the bid tabs and made a recommendation of award to the County. Limited construction phase services included construction observations, shop drawing review, preparation of final punch-list, and final project certification. Cost $192,000. Jerry Smith Road Bridge Culvert Replacement. Jacobs delivered PD&E study and detailed design for a failing 44-inch by 72-inch ECMP with approximately 144 linear feet of 48-inch by 76-inch ERCP. The PD&E study involved performing field investigations to ascertain the physical conditions that were contributing to the flooding, as well as conducting a review of Turkey Creek subwatershed area of the Alafia River Watershed. The regional HCSWMM model was updated based upon the field investigations, and multiple storm events were evaluated by mapping updated flood extents. Design options were evaluated in the HCSWMM model to determine recommended projects to alleviate localized flooding. The results of the study were documented in a technical memorandum that included conceptual sketches, preliminary engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost, and opportunities for upland grading. During the PD&E stage, JACOBS met with the County and maintenance staff to integrate discussion on known problem areas and through our discussions we were able to identify additional areas of concerns that were not included in the origincal Capital Improvement Plan Project description and subsequently added to the scope. Completed: 2017. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-17 Criterion 2: Past Performance Stormwater Management Master Plan Update Client: City of St. Petersburg, FL Completed: Ongoing The City of St. Petersburg contains a 62-square mile watershed consists of 26 different basins ranging from 1-square mile to 9 square-mile. During the Phase I, the Basin C existing condition model was updated using the most up to date ERP/As-built information, City land use maps, field reconnaissance. Watershed model parameterization was completed and an updated model was developed. Accounting for sea level rise and changes in rainfall, a future conditions model is also being developed. Sea level rise projections recommended by the Tampa Bay Regional Planni ng Council were used to update future coastal water conditions and rainfall volume projections were estimated using historical data. We conducted a critical storm analysis to identify the level of service at a roads and sub-basin scale. The results of this analysis, and the instituational knowledge of the City staff, will be used to identify the areas of concerns for BMP Alternative Analysis. The BMP alternative analysis looked at the flood reduction projects that will be sustainable and also resilient to future conditions. Phase II of the project is also underway, which includes updating the entire City of St. Petersburg watershed, including 26 separate basins. The update will follow a similar approach as Basin C, however, the models will be developed in ICPR4. Along with the 26 basins, the boundary interactions with the other Pinellas County watersheds will be evaluated. Phase II will include watershed evaluation, model development, floodplain analysis, and alternative analysis tasks. Public involvement is an important component in the project, and the City and Jacobs team planning a comprehensive public involvement right from the start to end of the project. As a part of the Masterplan, we are preparing a management plan for Crescent Lake, a highly modified 20-acre stormwater lake that receives and detains stormwater from a large portion of the northeast St. Petersburg watershed before it discharges to Coffee Pot Bayou. Driven by regulatory pressure to reduce nutrient loads and the City’s desire to improve stormwater quality, we’re preparing a plan to demonstrate concepts for stormwater improvement for Crescent lake that can be adapted to other lakes and ponds. Improvements being evaluated include hypolimnetic oxygenation, installing floating wetlands, improving littoral zone vegetative communities, chemical treatments, and destratification approaches that, coupled with treatment methods, may provide water quality benefits to Crescent Lake and Coffee Pot Bayou. Jacobs is also evaluating innovative solutions to more reliably and sustainably manage complex flood and water quality issues, including the use of injection wells and potentially developing new potable water sources with excess runoff to capture and store fresh water inland versus discharging it to nutrient limited estuaries. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C 2-18 Criterion 2: Past Performance Cross Bayou Estates Drainage Study Client: Pinellas County, FL Completed: 2017 The overall objective of the project was to develop a study analyzing the drainage in the Cross Bayou Estates area to provide alternatives and to alleviate flooding in the area of concern. The County identified drainage concerns south of Jacaranda Avenue and west of 83rd Street, which included the following locations within Project Area: Jacaranda Avenue, Iris Avenue, Hollyhock Avenue, Robin Road, Quail Road, and Pelican Lane. Drainage study included the following tasks: interviewing County staff on historical flooding; Site reconnaissance and data collection; Review of the existing Watershed Master Plan; Development of a local surface water model for existing and proposed alternatives (ICPR); Develop conceptual solutions to solve flooding problems – included design sketches and cost estimates; Presentation to County for approval and buy-in on recommended retrofit alternatives for final design. Existing condition assessments were conducted and developed alternatives to alleviate flooding in the areas of concern. Alternatives evaluated included upgrading the existing stormwater conveyance system, evaluating multiple pond sites to accommodate flooding, and combining system with the Starkey Road improvement system (design was in progress during the study). We conducted the pond siting feasibility analysis for two sites located on the south side of 82nd Avenue North, to alleviate flooding on Robin Road, Quail Road, and Pelican Lane. Another alternative evaluated was connecting directly to the Starkey Canal with and without offline storage at the pond sites. The evaluation process included studying adverse impacts to the Starkey Canal due to direct outfall from the study area. Cost-benefit matrix was developed and presented to the County. A follow-up study was conducted in 2017 to evaluate the 82nd pond site to divert some of the flows from the upgraded box culvert (from a ditch system) along the north side of 82nd Ave for potential attenuation and water quality improvements. Options considered included diverting all flow through the pond, diverting partial flow to the pond for treatment and connecting back to the system from east of 91st Street North; and no diversion but upsizing the pipe system from east of 91st Street North to Starkey Canal. The results were presented in cost benefit matrix in terms of flooding reductions and water In addition, we have provided planning and design services on ten major roadway design contracts (60+ miles of roadway) and five PD&E studies (40+ miles of roadway). Port Manatee Connector PD&E STUDY, FDOT District 1, Manatee and Hillsborough Counties, FL Client: FDOT District Jacobs managed this project that involved the development and evaluation of viable alternatives (4 to 7 miles in length) that would improve goods movement and traffic flow between I--75 and Port Manatee. For this project, the team completed the corridor and alignment analyses using an evaluation of numerous environmental constraints (wetlands, floodplains, cultural resources, threatened and endangered species, hazardous waste sites, and public lands). Public involvement included extensive consensus building with the Manatee County Port Authority, agency stakeholders, and project stakeholders including environmental special interest groups, major developers, and approximately 2,000 property owners. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Form 5 Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP, Principal Planner (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Collier County, FL (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov FAX: Telephone: 239-252-5779 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: Randall Boulevard Corridor Study Completion Date: 10/2019 Project Budget: _$662,496_________________________ Project Number of Days: 1020____________________ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10+ 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Form 5 Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP, Principal Planner (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Collier County, FL (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov FAX: Telephone: 239-252-5779 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: Safe Routes to School Grant(s) Included Grant Application(s), Exhibit(s), Roadway Safety Audit, Conceptual Sidewalk/Drainage Design(s) Completion Date: _2016 -2018_ Project Budget: _$55,000_________________________ Project Number of Days: 90______________________ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10+ 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10+ 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 9 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10+ 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 99 Mr. Gramer has an excellent ability to convey the needs of a project with graphics, photos and creating a story that grantors want to fund. I would hire him for any grant submittal. _ÉÜÜt|Çx _tÇàé KBGBEC 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Form 5 Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Trinity Scott – Collier County Transportation Planning Manager (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Collier County Transportation Planning (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: Trinity.Scott@colliercountyfl.gov> FAX: Telephone: 239-252-5832 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: T.I.G.E.R. Grant (2017): Immokalee Complete Streets - $16M (Won) Completion Date: 12/2017 Project Budget: _$50,000_____ Project Number of Days: 90 Days ______ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Form 5 Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Trinity Scott – Collier County Transportation Planning Manager (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Collier County Transportation Planning (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: Trinity.Scott@colliercountyfl.gov> FAX: Telephone: 239-252-5832 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: Transportation Planning 2013-2020 Completion Date: 6/2020 Project Budget: _$750,000+ (50+ Misc Tasks) _____ Project Number of Days: 8+ Years ______ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 9 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 99 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Form 5 Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP, Chad Polk, PE (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Don Scott, PE – Lee County MPO Director (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Lee County MPO (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: dscott@Leempo.com FAX: 239-790-2695 Telephone: 239-330-2241 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: Lee County Bicycle Pedestrian Safety Action Plan Update Completion Date: 6/2020 Project Budget: _$75,838_________________________ Project Number of Days: 365____________________ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 9 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 9 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 9 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 9 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 9 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 95 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Form 5 Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Katie Habgood, AICP (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Gary D. Harrell, Director (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: harrell@ccmpo.com FAX: Telephone: 941-883-3535 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: 2040 LRTP Completion Date: 10/2015 Project Budget: _$215,000_____ Project Number of Days: 548 Days ______ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Criterion 3. Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm9.E.6 Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services 3-1 RECENT, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WORKLOADS OF THE FIRM Criterion 3The Jacobs team fully understands the potential scope of services requirements. We have the resources to begin work immediately and we commit to making resources available to deliver your projects on budget and on time. Workload / Availability of Assigned Personnel Jacobs has successfully completed numerous projects for Southwest Florida clients over the past 20+ years, including projects for the Collier MPO and Collier County. We have a clear understanding of your needs and we understand that timely completion of projects is critical. As members of the Collier County community, your success is our success. Our team is fully committed to providing the Collier MPO and Collier County with quality deliverables for the duration of this contract. Project Manager, Bill Gramer, working in collaboration with our Florida- based team members, will ensure that the appropriate staff are available to meet any project need the County may request at any time under this contract. Although the nature of a 5-year (+1 annual renewal) duration, as-needed contract makes it difficult to project with any certainty an individual team member’s workload or availability, the depth of resources shown in our Organizational Chart indicates that Jacobs will have the staff and expertise available for the Collier MPO when needed. In addition, and as illustrated in our organization chart in Criterion 1, our team has been carefully crafted to ensure there is overlap in disciplines such that there will be no gaps in experience, knowledge, and availability, even with the uncertain time frames inherent in general services contracts. Our long history of working on as-needed contracts for both the County and throughout Florida has shown that building redundancy across all disciplines ensures that qualified team members are always available to support your projects and meet your deadlines. Our project delivery process for these types of contracts has been fine-tuned and successfully managed to the satisfaction of our clients. In fact, as proof of our commitment and capacity, nearly 90% of our current business is with repeat clients. Nationwide Reachback In addition, Jacobs can offer substantial state and national resources. We have a broad range of multi- disciplined staff located throughout Florida (3,600 in the state) and more than 25,000 in the U.S. For complex projects or challenges, Bill has the authority to bring on industry-recognized subject matter experts who have a wealth of hands-on experience on similar projects both in Florida and across the U.S. Ability to Complete On Time and Within Budget Our team members have been selected for their experience working on similar projects for the Collier MPO, Collier County and other Southwest Florida clients, their reputation for providing top- quality service and, most importantly, their ability to be committed to projects as they are assigned. Our understanding of the Collier MPO and Collier County work order process ensures that projects are conceptualized in a manner to meet the objectives. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services 3-2 Criterion 3: Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm Project Controls Bill Gramer, our proposed Project Manager, will apply project controls for tracking time, money, and budget that have proven successful on previous contracts, with clients throughout Florida, including the Collier MPO. These project controls, listed below, will ensure that schedule and budget are adhered to and standards for quality are met throughout the duration of this project: •Project schedule development and oversight •Measures of performance •Estimating and cost control •Change order tracking requests for information/ clarification •Progress reporting •Coordination meetings Proposal Preparation Once the details of the project scope are clarified, a proposal will be finalized. In general, the proposal will include a project definition, scope of requested services, fee information, and a schedule of deliverables and delivery dates. During proposal development, our team will begin to formulate a work plan. Work Plan Upon acceptance of the proposal and notice to proceed, the formal project Work Plan is finalized. Planning is crucial to project success. A quality work plan defines all roles and responsibilities and describes how the knowledge and skills of our team are used to meet or exceed the project requirements. The work plan is a powerful tool for creating a high- quality project and achieving the Collier MPO’s satisfaction. Development of the work plan is essential, as promotes efficient team collaboration. Effective instruction in the work plan eliminates cost overruns, schedule slippages, and ineffective personnel assignments, which promotes quality. The essential elements of a work plan answer the following: •What needs to be done? •Who will do the work? •What equipment will be needed? •When will the work be done? •How much will the work cost? •How will the work be done? •How will quality be ensured? •How will the client be kept satisfied? •How will changes be managed? •How will the project be closed? We recommend an initial meeting once the Collier MPO authorizes work to proceed. At this meeting, clear lines of communication are established that will remain in place throughout the project. Regularly scheduled project review meetings are held to ensure project success. Prior to starting work, a detailed analysis is performed that focuses on: •Project facilitation •Schedule requirements •Technical approach •Required expertise and staffing •Stakeholder identification and coordination •Public outreach (public involvement and education) Project Schedule Schedule monitoring consists of reviewing two separate schedules: the target (or control) schedule and the working schedule. The target schedule is the baseline schedule established at the beginning of the project. Approved changes are the only basis for changing the target schedule. Recognizing that actual performance never exactly matches the original plan, a working schedule is maintained that documents performance to date and predicts future events. Bill and his assigned Task Leads are responsible for coordinating project activities. During the course of a project changes inevitably occur that affect the schedule. When this happens, Bill works with Collier MPO staff so that the change is managed, with the least impact on project schedule and budget. “The 2015 Master Plan Update was recognized for its exemplary and innovative public engagement and cost-saving planning strategies, as well as providing the region a focused, yet flexible mechanism for continued impact capable of building consensus for major transportation investments crucial to creating quality communities, economic competitiveness and sustainable development.” TBARTA MEDIA ALERT, 2015 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services 3-3 Criterion 3: Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm Optimal schedule control means expediting completion of the project. We conduct team meetings on a regular basis to discuss key project milestones or any arising challenges. As part of the weekly meeting, we monitor the status of each task’s progress to avoid time-consuming rework. We also meet with each subconsultant bi-weekly to review the as-planned schedule and for a “look-ahead” review to ensure that we stay on schedule. Cost Control Our team will focus on two critical areas: on-time decision making and top-quality, committed project staffing. To ensure on-time decision making, we conduct task-specific workshops with Collier MPO staff to discuss and evaluate project elements. A variety of tools and techniques assist in establishing cost estimates and in refining those estimates as design proceeds. Specific strategies we implement to speed completion of this project includes: •Early integration of the Collier MPO staff into the processes, allowing us to evaluate deliverables during development, as opposed to milestone submittals, thereby minimizing surprises and reducing late changes. •Quality control, spearheaded by our QA/QC team members to provide input throughout the project. Our quality team reviews all documents as they are produced to reduce unnecessary re-work. •Weekly team meetings to discuss tasks requiring additional manpower, items ready for quality review, and the most efficient approaches to upcoming work tasks. •Close and early coordination with project stakeholders. We recognize the importance of continual cost control. Bill provides weekly reports identifying hours worked and staff, by discipline, working on the project. As Project Manager, he is responsible for reviewing the project financials against project status to ensure solid progress and the project is invoiced accurately each month. Integration with the Collier MPO, Local Stakeholders, and the FDOT An Integrated Team Approach Ensures Effective Project Communications Coordination of our project team with Collier MPO staff, Collier County Department of Transportation, and Florida Department of Transportation must be consistent and continuous to accomplish project delivery goals. Bill understands the level of accessibility and responsiveness the Collier MPO expects through our past experience working on General Planning Consultant Services contracts. We apply proven methods and tools for managing staff and assigning resources to all your projects. These methods have been used successfully on past task order-based contracts with Collier MPO, Collier County, Lee County, and FDOT1, as well as many other clients in Southwest Florida. Incorporating Input from MPO Staff A systematic approach is used for measuring, analyzing, and reporting the Collier MPO’s satisfaction with regard to our services. Your perspective is consistently factored into the quality improvement process. We are well known for our proactive communication style and ability to manage and deliver quality projects on time and within budget. Communications with Collier MPO staff on this contract, as with our existing projects, is continuous. Direction will be considered “official” only when in written format (e-mail, memo, letter) to avoid misinterpretations. “This is an awesome review considering the extremely short time you had. Unbelievable. We are so fortunate to have you assisting us.” WADDAH FARAH, FDOT DISTRICT 7 DISTRICTWIDE SIS Our team will utilize periodic workshops with Collier MPO, all affected stakeholders, and the community, as needed, to proactively address issues and concerns upfront which will prevent negative impacts to the project’s schedule and budget. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services 3-4 Criterion 3: Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm We value your input and apply a workshop approach, where appropriate, to obtain your comments throughout the contract. Workshops are held at project kick-off and at task milestones. Our goal is to provide effective communication of arising project challenges and provide recommended solutions. Comments will be documented and responded to at all milestones, as well as during the design process. Collier MPO comments are collected and responded to in a timely manner by means of a formatted report. Outstanding issues are discussed, and resolution is documented within a final report. Early and frequent coordination with the Collier MPO and other stakeholders identifies issues and concerns that must be resolved early in the project. Also, the workshops and consistent communication ensure that neither time nor money is wasted pursuing inappropriate alternatives. A Thorough Understanding of Transportation Planning Project Delivery Ensures Efficient, Effective Services From our experience delivering similar task orders and projects for other local governments in Florida, we are thoroughly familiar with both the RFP and work order processes for the assignment of work, and have successfully worked with numerous clients to develop scopes of work and deliver their projects. Our past work with government clients will expedite the contracting process and result in finished projects that comply with all Collier MPO standards. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Delivering superior quality service is our key marketplace strategy and is reinforced in every aspect of our business. As part of our Quality Control Program, we assign senior reviewers who are independent of the project and have the experience to provide concentrated, rigorous reviews throughout the project. Formal QC reviews are performed prior to Draft and Final Deliverables. These reviews concentrate on issues of consistency, completeness, clarity, coordination, constructability (when applicable), and cost effectiveness. Our Quality Improvement Program (QIP) is based on the principles of total quality management. Our Quality Assurance Program has established project- related policies, procedures, standards, training, and guidelines to ensure a successful project on-time and budget. Proven Track Record of Performance Successfully Managing Budget and Schedule Client Example Project Proposed Cost Actual Cost Lee County MPO Land Use Scenario Project $223,121 $223,121 City of Fort Myers JYLP Shared-Use Path Feasibility Study $170,000 $170,000 Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO 2040 LRTP $215,141 $215,141 Collier County Bus Shelter Design $58,260 $58,260 Collier County Pedestrian Bridge Crossing Feasibility Study $25,000 $25,000 Client Example Project Schedule Performance Lee County MPO Land Use Scenario Project Completed on schedule City of Fort Myers JYLP Shared-Use Path Feasibility Study Completed on schedule Collier County Bus Shelter Design Completed on schedule Collier County Pedestrian Bridge Crossing Feasibility Study Completed on schedule Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO 2040 LRTP Completed on schedule “It was a model process of collaboration and public participation - one we hope to see replicated in the future-and one that yielded a positive result…Thanks to the MPO and Jacobs consultant team. DARLA LETOURNEAU, PRESIDENT 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Resumes9.E.6 Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Education BS, Civil Engineering, Polytechnic University, NY Registrations/Certifications Florida Professional Engineer (#59090) California Professional Engineer (#49117) Certified Planner: AICP (#314390) Years of Experience 30 Experience Summary Bill is experienced in a wide variety of transportation and transit projects, including planning, traffic, roadway, drainage, utility, environmental, minor “local” roadways, major urban arterials, state route, and interstate highways. He has served as project manager and/or project coordinator for 45 different General Service Contracts for clients throughout Florida. Bill has expertise in project management, roadway/transit studies and design, bicycle and pedestrian plans (designed more than 100 miles of sidewalks/pathways/bicycle lanes), design-build criteria packages, underground utility design/relocations, PD&E studies and community outreach. He has also managed over 40 public involvement meetings and 100+ project stakeholder meetings. Relevant Project Experience Project Manager, Collier MPO, 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan, Collier County, FL. The Jacobs team is working with the Collier MPO to complete the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan update identifying implementable projects through 2045. The update includes developing a land use alternative and socioeconomic data for 2045; analyzing modeling results; recommending alternative projects; developing costs of the new projects; refining the goals, objectives, policies, and performance measures; evaluating potential projects; development of a Needs Plan and Cost Feasible Plan; and LRTP documentation. The team initiated a virtual public engagement program to reach out the stakeholders, agency representatives, elected officials, and the community during the update. Senior Advisor, Golden Gate City Walkable Community Study, Collier MPO, Collier County, FL. Study was to develop a prioritized list of sidewalk and pedestrian amenity projects that would promote and enhance walkability, bicycle use, transit use, and social equity throughout the community. The study utilized field data collection, community engagement, quantitative and qualitative technical analyses, and best practices to develop and validate prioritized recommendations for a more walkable, safer, and healthier community. When implemented, the recommendations will result in a community where mobility options, safety, social engagement, and a “sense of place” are the foundation of the neighborhood. Project Manager, Tiger Grant Application – Immokalee Complete Streets, Collier County Planning, Collier County, FL. Responsible for preparing the grant application for the Immokalee Complete Street Grant Project, which included preparation of grant application, exhibits, estimates, benefit-cost analysis, and all required documentation. Project was successful and resulted in a $13,132,691 Grant. Project Manager, Complete Streets Design-Build Criteria Package for Tiger Grant Application, Lee County MPO, Lee County, FL. Responsible for managing the conceptual design efforts for the 11 planned projects listed in the Complete Streets Initiative TIGER Grant application. Project included preparation of conceptual plans and typical sections that defined project features such as sidewalks, pathways, bike lanes, shoulders, preparation of quantities and project estimates, preparation of a preliminary/conceptual design, and construction schedule. Safe Routes to School Grant Application, Collier County, FL. Project Manager. Assisted the County in developing two successful Safe Routes to School Grants (Eden and Shadowlawn). Prepared conceptual roadway plans, typical sections location maps, existing condition map, student location map, proof of right-of-way, and analyzed crash data and traffic data. Also evaluated field conditions with representatives from FDOT and Collier County. The Eden Elementary School Grant was awarded $717,071 and the Shadowlawn Elementary School Grant was awarded $851,459 through Safe Routes to School Funding under the requirements of the Local Agency Program (LAP). Project Manager, Miscellaneous Planning Services, Collier County, FL. Led the efforts for a variety of transportation planning and engineering services for the Collier MPO and Collier County Planning Department under Jacobs’ (CH2M) General Services contract(s) (2004-present). Services have included: roadway planning and conceptual designs, intersection improvement concepts, preparation of grant applications, project cost estimates, and coordination with FDOT 1 for proposed improvements. R-1 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Engineer of Record, Collier County, Golden Gate Collector Sidewalks and Sunshine Blvd. Sidewalks and Pedestrian Bridge LAP Projects, Collier County, FL. This project included the design and preparation of final design documents for constructing a 6-foot sidewalk on the south side of Golden Gate Parkway, approximately 950 LF, as well as the construction of approximately 5,175 feet. Additional project elements included coordination with the County, preparation of quantities and engineers estimate of cost, utility coordination, and post design services. Designed in accordance with current FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards (also known as the “Florida Green Book” criteria.) Project Manager, Old US 41 Redevelopment Complete Streets Concepts, City of Bonita Springs, FL. This project provided conceptual roadway and storm water designs for Old US 41 from Bonita Beach Road to W. Terry Street. The intent was to evaluate alternatives for roadway, bike lanes, pathways, sidewalks, access management, and storm water improvements. The concepts included roundabout designs at Pennsylvania Avenue and W. Terry Street. Project Manager, Bus Shelter Planning and Design, Collier County, FL. Provide various services related to the planning and design of two new bus shelters for their Collier Area Transit (CAT) bus system. The work involved assisting the ATM staff in developing and evaluating various bus shelter alternatives in an effort to improve the existing bus shelters with regards to passenger comfort and convenience (standing areas, seating, protection from sun and rain, information, etc.). Prepared a Bus Shelter Alternatives Technical Memorandum and Bus Shelter Amenities Survey Questionnaire. Also prepared for and attended the Public Transit Ad Hoc Advisory Committee (PTAC) Meetings. Project Manager, Bus Shelter Design to Achieve ADA Compliance, Collier County, FL. Managed the preparation of plans, details, quantities, specifications, cost estimates, bidding, and services during construction for site modifications required to bring 50 bus stops located along the State highway system in Collier County up to ADA compliance. The bus stops were designed to meet federal guidelines as outlined in the ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Transportation Facilities. Project Manager, Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Corridor Study, Collier County, FL. Managed a corridor study to investigate the feasibility of extending Vanderbilt Beach Road a distance of approximately 10 miles. The initial objective of the study was to identify existing and future transportation demands along the fast- growing extension corridor. That led to creation of conceptual new alignment alternatives that would potentially relieve existing congestion and accommodate future traffic volumes. Alternatives were evaluated for their traffic impacts, cost effectiveness, impacts to area businesses and residents, environmental impacts, and consistency with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Extensive right-of-way investigations were performed to determine potential impacts of 15 different corridor alternatives. Project Manager, ADA Surveys, Collier County, FL. Providing physical surveys of 363 various County structures located on 127 sites (over 2.1 million sf). The surveys include a report of findings regarding ADA compliance and a statement of probable construction cost for remediation of any ADA items found out of compliance. Project Manager, Collier-Immokalee Intersection Improvements Design, Collier County, FL. Responsible for managing the intersection improvements to the Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard Intersection, which will provide additional capacity to the intersection and extend Collier Blvd. north approximately one-half mile. The intersection improvements were planned and designed to accommodate a future SPUI at this intersection. Services included roadway alternatives analysis, roadway design, drainage design, sidewalks, bike lanes, pathways, canal relocation, pre-fabricated bridge crossing of canal, box culvert extension, signalization, lighting, utility design, and coordination with FPL for relocation of transmission and distribution lines, and permitting. Project Manager, Tree Farm Road Phase II Design, Collier County, FL. Managed the design for the half-mile segment of Tree Farm Road. This two-lane roadway section links four roadways with a new roundabout. The project consists of a new two- lane new roadway with sidewalks, pathways, bike lanes and a new roundabout. The project included water main and force main design and permitting. The project used three adjacent development ponds for stormwater treatment and attenuation. Project Manager, Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Design, Collier County, FL. Managed the design of a new 10-mile, six-lane roadway from Collier Boulevard to Desoto Boulevard. Responsibilities included providing public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, maintenance of traffic, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. R-2 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Project Manager, Collier Boulevard (Golden Gate Boulevard to Green Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL. Managed the widening of 4 miles of the existing four-lane, urban, divided roadway. Responsibilities included managing a multi-firm team in providing public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, maintenance of traffic, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Project Manager, Collier Boulevard (US 41 to Davis Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL. Managed this design project, which involved roadway capacity improvements to a 7-mile segment from US 41 to Davis Boulevard. Jacobs provided design plans and specifications for widening the existing four-lane roadway to a six-lane facility, including four major intersections. (Permits: SFWMD, USACE FDEP.) Project Manager, Collier Boulevard (Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road) Design, Collier County, FL. Managed the Collier Boulevard (CR 951) project that involved widening three miles of the existing two-lane roadway to a six-lane, urban divided roadway from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. Responsibilities included public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, maintenance of traffic, structural design, environmental impacts, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. (Permits: SFWMD, ACOE FDEP.) Project Manager, Immokalee Road (Collier Boulevard to 43rd Avenue NE) Design, Collier County, FL. Managed this design project that involved the 8.1-mile widening of Immokalee Road from two to six lanes. Services provided for this project included complete roadway design, permitting services, drainage design, wetland mitigation, water and force main design, signal design, roadway lighting, traffic studies, and services during construction. Project Manager, Vanderbilt Beach Road (Airport-Pulling Road to Collier Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL. Managed the widening of 5.5 miles of the existing two-lane roadway to a six-lane, urban divided roadway. The project required extensive attention to public concerns regarding local access, circulation, traffic demands, impacts to businesses and residential areas, and aesthetics. Project Manager, Pine Ridge Road (Airport- Pulling Road to Logan Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL. Managed this design project involving widening Pine Ridge Road from four to six lanes converting the existing rural section to an urban section. The 3.3-mile project included widening Pine Ridge Road through the I-75 interchange. One unique aspect of the project was the redesign of the northbound on- and off-ramps to accommodate dual left-turn lanes. Project Coordinator, Gordon River Water Quality Park, Collier County, FL. Directly involved in the creation of this 50-acre constructed treatment wetland and public park. Project involves a rare consortium of government agencies and municipalities that have joined together to design and build a constructed wetland facility that, once built, will provide flood attenuation and stormwater treatment for a 2-square-mile urban watershed. Project Manager/Coordinator, Webber Street (McIntosh Road to Cattleman Road) Design, Sarasota County, FL. The 2-mile, four-lane divided collector roadway included bicycle lanes, grassed center median with streetscaping, retaining walls, a 200-foot bridge (Phillippi Creek), major cross-road culverts, privacy walls for residences, intersection improvements, traffic control devices, a closed storm drain system to serve the roadway, stormwater system to intercept runoff from private properties adjacent to the roadway, pond design compensation for filling within the 100-year flood plain, and facilities for mitigation of environmental and neighborhood impacts. Project Manager, Pine Street (Dearborn St. to US41) Design, Sarasota County, FL. The new roadway was designed as a six-lane divided arterial with a majority of the alignment using a rural section. The project involves the preparation of preliminary and final design drawings, geotechnical investigations, obtaining environmental and drainage permits, traffic signal design, preparation of right-of- way plans, and surveying. The project was developed in stages, with the first 3,000-foot section designed to 100% plans. The project involved extensive wetland mitigation along with mitigation for the Florida Scrub Jay. R-3 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Jason Bird Education AA-Associate of Arts (Engineering electives) Course work in Civil Engineering with Construction Management focus, University of Central Florida Registrations/Certifications N/A Years of Experience 19 Experience Summary Jason Bird is a seasoned civil engineering professional with experience in commercial, residential, public open space, utility, stormwater, and transportation projects from feasibility studies to conceptual planning, through design, permitting, and construction administration. His focus is on infrastructure assessment, green infrastructure and sustainability, including LEED, ENVISION evaluations, water resources, and water conservation, for municipal, master planned communities, and U.S. federal facilities. He has applied his knowledge of infrastructure design and climate science to risk and vulnerability evaluations to develop and prioritize mitigation measures and adaptive strategies to protect and enhance capital investment and the overall resilience of built and natural assets. Relevant Project Experience Project Manager, The Nature Conservancy, Punta Gorda, FL. Developed living shoreline plan and conceptual design for Four Points Sheraton Hotel coastline of Charlotte Harbor to enhance the performance of the coastline in providing ecological habitat, erosion protection, and improved aesthetics for visitors to regional tiki bar restaurant along public waterfront promenade. This pilot project will be used to inform the application of living shorelines as nature-based solutions for coastal climate adaptation. Resilience Lead, North Miami Beach Utility Masterplan, FL. Project to incorporate risk reduction, increased reliability, enhanced operational continuity, and resilience to climate hazards into utility masterplan, minimum design criteria, and CIP decision support framework with focus on existing and future climate hazards. Included review of Hurricane Irma impacts from 2017 storm season. Task Lead, JEA Resilience Masterplan, Jacksonville, FL. Vulnerability review of all water and wastewater assets to inform immediate, near- term, and longer-term activities to harden systems against flood risk and broader climate impacts. Develop adaptation strategies, perform benefit cost analysis, and prioritize as part of phased implementation plan to protect utility against future storm impacts. Benchmark utility against other resilience leading utilities. Prepare resilience plan for assessment/advancement of utility LOS and future climate resilience. Resilience Lead, Hendricks Wellfield Assessment, Jacksonville Electric Authority, FL. In the wake of Hurricane Irma in 2017, the potable water production wellfield was impacted by flood waters causing shut down of numerous pumps nearly causing loss of water distribution system pressure and contamination of water supply. Performed climate hazard review of critical infrastructure and developed system improvement recommendations for risk reduction and increase to system reliability. Resilience Lead, Integrated Water Resources Masterplan, City of St. Petersburg, FL. Evaluated City water and wastewater treatment, distribution, and collection systems for climate-related vulnerabilities and recommended improvements to reduce risk, increase reliability, maintain operations, and prevent sewer overflows in the face of increasing storm intensity. Developed mitigation and adaptation strategies and prioritized for inclusion in phased implementation plan. Technical Lead for Resiliency Study, City of Miami Beach, FL. Strategies were evaluated to mitigate flooding of public and private property. This task order included policy review and recommended changes for new construction and major renovation, including minimum building finish floor (FF) elevations and City freeboard. Performed data collection, case study review, and preparation of a White Paper focused on Unintended Consequences of Elevating City Streets. Performed asset risk and vulnerability assessment and mapping of various flood scenarios to inform capital improvement projects and minimum design criteria for future climate conditions. Task Lead, Comprehensive Plan Update, City of Fort Lauderdale, FL. As a community in Southeast Florida experiencing increasing impacts from coastal and rain-driven flooding, the City is enhancing their City Comprehensive Plan to incorporate resilience. This project involves reviewing and modification to existing Comprehensive Plan elements including the Parks and Recreation Element, the Coastal Management Element, and the creation of a new Climate Change Element, which includes guidance from “Press Play,” the City’s Strategic Plan and “Fast Forward,” the City’s Vision Plan. R-4 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Jason Bird Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Technical Lead, Infrastructure, Downtown Waterfront Masterplan, St. Petersburg, FL. Project included over 7 miles of waterfront in urban setting including downtown, airport, seaport, and industrial and residential areas. As technical lead for sustainable infrastructure, provided infrastructure and asset review and high-level impact analysis for sea level rise and storm surge to inform adaptive strategies for integration into masterplan. Senior Civil Engineering/Water Lead, Guam Joint Military Master Plan SSIM Water Balance Modeling, NAVFAC Pacific, Guam. Provided modeling for sustainable strategies related to the domestic water system and its interaction with other water systems. Created modeling and performed evaluation of treated return effluent, stormwater recapture, rainwater harvesting, grey water use, and double/triple plumbing of homes. Utilized a Whole Systems Water Balance Model to evaluate water conservation and reuse strategies identified in the workshop. Incorporated LID components into the water model based on an extensive hydraulic evaluation. Due to the high level of sustainability required and extreme climate, extensive conservation and reuse efforts were implemented to achieve the project goals. Task Lead, Guam Joint Military Master Plan, Water Plan Implementation, NAVFAC Pacific, Guam. Involved with creating the implementation plan for water modeling results and recommendations. The implementation involved LEED certification, tracking, and continued monitoring and support to ensure the anticipated performance goals were achieved. R-5 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Sunserea Dalton, PE Education BS, Civil Engineering, University of Central Florida Registrations/Certifications Professional Engineer: Florida (#70659) Years of Experience 16 Experience Summary Sunserea Dalton has 16 years of Transportation planning and PD&E study experience in project management/technical coordination for multimodal corridors and environmental assessments on over 15 major transportation studies. Her recent experience with Office of Systems Management and Florida’s Strategic Intermodal System Planning Office on planning initiatives and studies. Sunserea has expertise in providing hands-on technical management, interagency coordination, and delivery of quality documents for major expressways, highways and rail corridors to ensure ultimate corridor needs are thoroughly considered by all stakeholders. Relevant Project Experience Project Coordinator, Port Manatee Connector PD&E Study, FDOT District One, Manatee and Hillsborough Counties, FL. Responsibilities included coordination and review of engineering, environmental analyses, and public involvement deliverables to develop and evaluate viable corridor alternatives to improve goods movement and traffic flow between I-75 and Port Manatee. A Corridor Analysis Report and Preliminary Alignment Report were completed using numerous environmental constraints (wetlands, floodplains, cultural resources, threatened and endangered species, hazardous waste sites, and public lands). Instrumental in the documentation of public outreach and agency coordination including the Statement of Significance letters to assess potential for Section 4(f) protection. Also directed the public involvement activities, including the development of project newsletters, advertisements, public record requests, and documents necessary to conduct the public meetings. Project Engineer, University Parkway Transportation System Management Study, FDOT District One, Sarasota and Manatee Counties, FL. Responsible for preparation of Transportation System Management (TSM) study report to document engineering analyses. Assisted with concept development of TSM alternatives. Coordinated development of the corridor conceptual plans, including intersection improvements and preparation of planning-level cost estimates. Project Engineer, US 27 Corridor Access Management Plan (CAMP), FDOT District One, Highlands County, FL. Responsible for data collection, analysis of existing conditions, project documentation, and public involvement coordination. Project Engineer, Traffic Engineering Services Contract, FDOT District One, FL. Responsible for assisting with specific task work orders primarily including development of project traffic reports, FIHS/ SIS evaluations, traffic operations analysis, safety analysis, DRI reviews, and public involvement coordination. Staff Engineer, US 41 Project Traffic Report, FDOT District One, Charlotte County, FL. Assisted in traffic data collection and participated in field review of existing conditions. Also helped develop traffic forecasts for future years for AADTs, DDHVs, and peak-hour turning movements. Task Work Order Manager/Lead Planner, Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Corridor Prioritization, FDOT Central Office, Tallahassee, FL. Managed task work order to develop planning- level evaluation of all statewide SIS highway corridors to support SIS Planning objectives to prioritize potential future interregional corridor planning studies for further analysis. The desktop analysis included development of screening analysis and prioritization criteria, documentation of existing/ future conditions, intermodal connectivity, project readiness, and alignment with FDOT’s Florida Transportation Plan and SIS Policy plan. Quality Review, North I-75 Master Plan, FDOT Central Office, Tallahassee, FL. This Master Plan evaluated existing/future conditions, corridor constraints, and capacity improvements on I-75 and other parallel Strategic Intermodal System corridors (US 41, US 441, and US 301) as a system and determined their ability to accommodate current and future traffic growth. Based on the I-75 Task Force Recommendations Report, the evaluation documented further recommendations regarding strategies for immediately optimizing existing transportation corridors; and to evaluate potential enhancements to, or transformation of existing corridors. Technical Coordinating Committee Member, Planning Processes Development, FDOT Central Office, Tallahassee, FL. Supporting FDOT Central Office initiative to document best practices and procedures for Planning Processes conducted for statewide, interregional facilities. Responsibilities include documentation of existing processes, identification of opportunities to streamline project development activities, and interoffice coordination with Systems Implementation, Policy Planning and Environmental Management. R-6 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Sunserea Dalton, PE Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Deputy Project Manager/ Project Documents Transportation Engineer, Wekiva Parkway PD&E Study, Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX) and FDOT District Five, Orange, Lake, and Seminole Counties, FL. Project involved the corridor analysis for widening of a 26-mile limited- access toll facility from four to six lanes on a new alignment completing the Western Beltway around the metropolitan Orlando area. This high-profile project was evaluated pursuant to State of Florida legislation (Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act), and was the subject of a governor-appointed task force to provide a process to protect the sensitive environmental attributes in the area. Responsibilities included preparation of EA, Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation for affected public lands and Individual Section 4(f) Evaluation for Section 106 historic resources. The Wekiva Parkway PD&E was downgraded from an EIS to an EA based on early project coordination with FHWA on the Class of Action. Coordinator/ Environmental Lead, HEFT/SR 821 PD&E Study and Design-Build RFP Package, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Miami-Dade County, FL. Responsible for coordination of all engineering, environmental and public involvement documents. The project consisted of two separate yet concurrent tasks: Part A: PD&E study to evaluate the environmental impacts to widen 11 miles of the Homestead Extension of the Florida’s Turnpike to eight lanes between Campbell Drive and US 1, and Part B: Design-Build RFP package for preliminary design and environmental permits for an interim six-lane widening. The improvements include the addition of one express lane in each direction and interchange modifications to the Campbell Drive Interchange. Directed public involvement activities, including project newsletters, advertisements, and documents necessary to conduct the public hearing. Issues included roadway, structures, stakeholder coordination regarding the project and addition of express lanes, geotechnical activities, noise wall placement, drainage, and utility coordination. Project Manager, Beachline East (SR 528) Expressway PD&E Study, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Orange and Brevard Counties, FL. Responsible for managing PD&E Study development and public involvement, engineering and environmental task leads for this study to evaluate the proposed Beachline widening to eight lanes from SR 520 to SR 524 (Industry Road). The PD&E Study includes overlapping design (milling and resurfacing) for critical roadway segments, feasibility evaluation of a potential service plaza, multimodal accommodations for rail/transit facilities, and extensive environmental resources within the study area. Deputy Project Manager and Environmental Lead, US 441 (SR 500) (North of SR 46 to SR 44) PD&E Study, FDOT District Five, Lake County, FL. Assisted managing a multi-firm team for the PD&E study to widen US 441 from four to six lanes including the preparation of Type 2 Corridor Evaluation (CE), PER and review of PD&E support documents. Environmental constraints included minimizing impact to farmlands, avoiding Section 4(f) resources and minimizing the right-of-way footprint. Engineering issues involved appropriate design speed determination, evaluation of rural, suburban, and urban typical sections, lay out the southern tie-in to the existing four lane rural section. Additional engineering issues included tie-in to the future Wekiva Parkway high speed urban typical section and changing the access management classification. Public concerns addressed were related to the signalized intersections, and the value engineering recommendation to eliminate existing dedicated right turn lanes for low turn volume locations. R-7 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Jessica Dean, PE Education BSc, Civil Engineering, UCF Registrations/Certifications Florida PE (#72975) Years of Experience 15 Experience Summary Jessica is a transportation planner / engineer with 15 years of experience in transportation planning, transit, and PD&E. Some of her areas of expertise include freight planning, long range transportation planning, policy planning, traffic study reviews, transit safety / security certification, public involvement, design plan audits, and bicycle/pedestrian planning. Relevant Project Experience Senior PD&E Project Manager, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Environmental Management Office (EMO) Project Manager, Ocoee, FL. Project manager responsible for Project Development and Environment (PD&E) studies and management of the PD&E miscellaneous services contracts. The project involves managing PD&E studies and contracts on behalf of the Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise. This work was completed as an Atkins/ SNC Lavalin employee under the General Engineering Contract. Senior PD&E Project Manager, FDOT, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Continuing PD&E Services Contract Manager, Ocoee, FL. Contract Manager responsible for managing the consultant teams for two Continuing PD&E Services contracts. These contracts involve providing miscellaneous support to the Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise such as Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) screenings, feasibility studies, PD&E document reviews, public involvement support, and environmental surveys. This work was completed as an Atkins/SNC Lavalin employee under the General Engineering Contract. Senior PD&E Project Manager, FDOT, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, SR 417 Extension Feasibility Study, Northeast Central Florida. Project Manager responsible as extension of Department staff to manage the continuing services consultant and coordinate the feasibility study. This project involved conducting a pre-PD&E study to evaluate different alternatives for the extension of SR 417 from its existing alignment to I-95 as directed under a federal earmark. The effort was led by the River to Sea TPO. This work was completed as an Atkins/SNC Lavalin employee under the General Engineering Contract. Assistant Project Manager, FDOT, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Coastal Connector Alternative Corridor Evaluation (ACE), Citrus and Marion Counties, FL. Assistant Project Manager responsible as extension of Department staff to manage the consultant and coordinate the ACE study for the assigned project manager, as needed. This project involved conducting an Alternative Corridor Evaluation (ACE), high-level planning study, for a potential new corridor in Citrus and Marion Counties. This work was completed as an Atkins/SNC Lavalin employee under the General Engineering Contract. Sr. PD&E Project Manager, FDOT, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, US 27 Feasibility Study, Polk County, FL. Project Manager responsible as extension of Department staff to manage the continuing services consultant and coordinate the feasibility study. This project involved assessing the feasibility to add toll lanes on US 27 from SR 60 to US 192. This work was completed as an Atkins/SNC Lavalin employee under the General Engineering Contract. Sr. PD&E Project Manager, FDOT, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Central Polk Parkway Extension PD&E Study, Bartow, FL. Project Manager responsible as extension of Department staff to scope the project, manage the selected consultant, and coordinate the PD&E study. This project involved conducting a PD&E for the continuation of the Central Polk Parkway, a new four lane corridor, from SR 35 (US 17) to SR 60. The PD&E also included evaluating interchange alternatives at SR 35 (US 17) and SR 60 and required to work in close coordination with the adjacent design project. This work was completed as an Atkins/SNC Lavalin employee under the General Engineering Contract. Transportation Engineer/Planner, FDOT District 5, US 301 PD&E Study, Central Florida. Transportation Engineer/Planner responsible for supporting the project manager with public involvement activities and report writing. This work was completed as an HDR employee. Transportation Planner, FDOT District 5, SR 19 PD&E Study, Lake County, FL. Transportation Planner responsible for supporting the project manager and task lead for public involvement activities. This work was completed as an HDR employee. Transportation Planner, FDOT District 5, SR 40 PD&E Study, Central Florida. Transportation Planner responsible for supporting the project manager and task lead for public involvement activities. This work was completed as an HDR employee. R-8 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Jessica Dean, PE Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Transportation Planner, FDOT District 5, SR 500 PD&E Study, Central Florida. Transportation Planner responsible for supporting the project manager and task lead for public involvement activities. This work was completed as an HDR employee. Transportation Planner, FDOT District 5, SR 600 PD&E Study, Central Florida. Transportation Planner responsible for supporting the project manager and task lead for public involvement activities. This work was completed as an HDR employee. Transportation Planner/Engineer, FDOT District 5, General Planning Contract, Deland, FL. Transportation Planner/Engineer responsible for assisting the Contract/Project Manager on miscellaneous planning tasks assigned by the Department. The contract included task work orders such as writing TIGER and FASTLANE grants, organizing and holding public meetings/workshops/ forums, Strategic Intermodal System support, and other assignments as requested by the Department. This work was completed as an HDR employee. Task Lead, FDOT District 5, I-4 Ultimate, Central Florida. Task Lead responsible for the Envision sustainability award package. The project involved coordinating with several project partners and disciplines to assemble a sustainability award application for the Envision platinum rating. The task was successful and the Department received their award in early 2017. This work was completed as an HDR employee. Transportation Engineer/Planner, FDOT District 5, East Central Florida Future Corridor Pilot Project, Central Florida. The purpose of this high-level planning study was to address an Executive Order to evaluate and identify recommendations for future transportation corridors to serve established and emerging economic activity centers. A critical component was to ensure any recommended future corridor would be compatible with other transportation plans and consider the visions and recommendations by the local communities within the study area. This work was completed as an HDR employee. Transportation Engineer/Planner responsible for supporting the assigned Task Force with outreach activities associated with the future corridor pilot project. Deputy Project Manager, FDOT District 5, Freight Planning Contract, Central Florida. Deputy Project Manager responsible for contract management and task work order execution. The project involved miscellaneous support to the District including development of a freight data hub, FASTLANE grants, truck parking studies, and other assignments as requested by the Department. This work was completed as an HDR employee. Transportation Engineer/Planner, FDOT District 1, Freight Plan, Phase 1, FL. Transportation Engineer/Planner responsible for assisting the project manager with data collection, analysis, and report production. The project involved assessing the existing conditions of freight movements around District One and identifying future needs and recommended improvements. This work was completed as an HDR employee. Transportation Engineer/Planner, National Park Service, Long Range Transportation Planning Framework, Nationwide. The purpose of this assignment was to develop a Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) framework for the National Park Service (NPS) that could be applied at the national, regional, and unit levels. The framework was required to meet both the requirements of an LRTP and the mission of NPS. This work was completed as an HDR employee. Transportation Engineer/Planner responsible for supporting the project manager with development of the LRTP framework. Transportation Planner, Eglin Air Force Base, Eglin Air Force Base Transportation Master Plan, Valparaiso, FL. The project involved development of a transportation master plan that identified on- base and adjacent transportation improvements to increase the efficient flow of traffic. Activities within this study included data collection, traffic analysis, future alternatives development, and stakeholder outreach. This work was completed as an HDR employee. Transportation Planner responsible for supporting the project manager as needed. R-9 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Glenn Dombrowski Education New England Institute of Technology of Palm Beach – Advanced AutoCAD Broward Community College – Building Construction and Engineering Technology Registrations/Certifications N/A Years of Experience 32 Experience Summary Glenn Dombrowski is one of the early pioneers of the use of three-dimensional (3D) computer modeling, animation, and video production within the engineering and architectural industry. Since 1982 he has worked on a multitude of municipal, recreational, residential, and commercial projects. Glenn’s animations/video productions have been shown in corporate boardrooms throughout the world, on network and public television, and at the White House. A notable production was a 3D computer animation created as a result of Superstorm Sandy for PBS NOVA’s “Megastorm Aftermath” showing the design for the NYC Outer Harbor Gateway Storm Barrier. Relevant Project Experience Visualization Task Manager, The Port of Gulfport Restoration Program, Mississippi State Port Authority at the Port of Gulfport, MI. Created the 3D computer animated video production as part of community outreach efforts by the Port of Gulfport, to visually show the public what will be constructed and completed on the Port of Gulfport in late 2016 and 2017. Visualization Task Manager, South Capitol Street Corridor Project – Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge, Washington DC, DDOT. Created the 3D computer animated video production showing the new design for replacing the Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge and transforming related sections of urban freeway into a beautiful scenic boulevard that increases pedestrian and vehicular safety, improves multi-modal transportation options, increases community accessibility and supports economic development on both sides of the Anacostia River. Visualization Task Manager, TraPac Automated Container Terminal, Port of Los Angeles, San Pedro, CA. Created the 3D computer animated video production explaining the most technologically advanced automated container terminal on the west coast of the US, at the Port of Los Angeles, as well as community improvements to the adjacent 30 acre recreational park. The production is currently being used for public involvement efforts as well as internal stakeholder involvement at the Port of LA. Visualization Task Manager, Phase 2 Design, Proposed RTC Southeast Connector Roadway, Reno, NV. Created the 3D computer animated video production depicting the proposed 4.5-mile roadway project for use as a public involvement tool. Visualization Task Manager, Sampson Way Roadway Improvements, Port of Los Angeles, San Pedro, CA. Created the 3D computer animated video production of project concepts for the realignment of the Waterfront Red Car (trolley) Line and realignment of Sampson Way including upland development concepts for approximately 1.7 miles along the San Pedro waterfront. The production was successfully used for public involvement efforts and received the 2013 Pixie Award for 3D Animation. Visualization Task Manager, Green Line Extension Stations, San Diego Department of Transportation, CA. Created the 3D computer animated video production depicting proposed improvements to the Green Line Rail system. The production was successfully used for public involvement efforts and received the 2012 Pixie Award for 3D Animation within Live Video. Visualization Task Manager, I-5 North Coast Corridor, San Diego Department of Transportation, CA. Created the 3D computer animated video production depicting proposed improvements to the I-5 roadway system as well as a bus rapid transit facility. The production was successfully used for public involvement efforts and received the 2007 Telly Award for Government Relations. Visualization Task Manager, Tracy Wetlands, City of Tracy, Tracy, CA. Created the 3D computer animated video production depicting a proposed wetland area and its benefits to the community as well as being integrated with the improvements to the Tracy wastewater treatment plant. The production was successfully used for public involvement, funding and received 2007 Telly Award for 3D Animation. R-10 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Glenn Dombrowski Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Visualization Task Manage, Bayport Cruise Terminal, Port of Houston Authority, Houston, TX. Created the 3D computer animated video production explaining the cruise passenger experience at the proposed cruise terminal including activities throughout Houston, Texas and received the 2007 Telly Award for the use of 3D Animation within a Government Relations Production. Visualization Task Manager, DGS-1 Facilities – Langley Air Force Base and Beale Air Force Base, Army Corps of Engineers, Langley AFB, Virginia and Beale AFB, CA. Created the 3D computer animated video production depicting proposed DGS-1 facilities and their benefits. The production was used for stakeholder involvement efforts, funding, and received the 2007 Telly Award for the use of 3D animation within a Military Production. Visualization Task Manager, Moin Container Terminal, APM Terminals, Moin, Costa Rica. Created the 3D computer animated video production depicting the future Moin Container Terminal and its positive impacts to the communities within Costa Rica. The production is currently being used for public involvement efforts and as a funding tool. Seaport Industry Projects  Port Canaveral – cruise ship operations 3D computer animation simulation  Port Canaveral Maritime Academy – 3 promotional videos  Port of Gulfport Mississippi – 3 promotional videos  Port of Gulfport Mississippi – Seatrade trade show booth and graphics  Port of Gulfport Mississippi – Break Bulk trade show exhibit and graphics  Port of Gulfport Mississippi – 3D computer animation simulation and presentations for Holland America & Princess Cruise Lines  Port of Gulfport Mississippi – Fishing Pier 3D computer animation/video production  British Virgin Islands – Seatrade trade show exhibit and 3D computer animation video  Port Manatee – Seatrade trade show 3D Digital Imaging exhibit  Belize Tourism Village – 2 promotional videos and AAPA trade show booth, graphics, & staffing  San Pedro De Macoris, Dominican Republic – proposed container terminal 3D computer animation video and video CD  Carnival Cruise Lines – Crown Bay presentation  Port of Mobile – 3D computer animation and presentation  Port of Palm Beach – Lighting study simulation 3D computer animation  Port of Tampa Cruise Terminal No. 2 – 3D computer animation, renderings, and presentation  Fernandina Beach-Amelia Island-Yulee Chamber of Commerce – Cruise Assessment Study 3D computer animation and video production Architectural/Engineering/Construction Industry Projects  O’Connor & Taylor – promotional video  Western Communities Center for the Performing Arts – 3D computer animation and video  PC Professor Technical Institute – 30 second TV commercial  Henry Morrison Flagler Museum – Pavilion 3D computer animation promotional video  Hvide Marine – prototype vessel animation and trade show exhibits  Tequesta Public Safety Building – 3D computer animation, renderings, and presentation  Good Shepherd Episcopal Church – 3D computer animation and presentation  City of Tarpon Springs – Public Safety Complex 3D computer animation, renderings, and presentation  Wartsila NSD – 3D computer animation, renderings, and presentation  Airbus Industrie – 3D computer animation, renderings, and presentation  Enlight Corporation USA – 3D computer animation, renderings, and presentation  Sumter Electric Cooperative Inc. – 3D computer animation, renderings, and presentation R-11 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Ana Elias, PhD, PE, PTOE Education PhD, Civil Engineering, University of Florida ME, Civil Engineering, University of Florida BS, Civil Engineering, University Cordoba, Argentina Registrations/Certifications Professional Engineer: Florida (#66369) Professional Traffic Operations Engineer: Florida (#2332) Years of Experience 28 Experience Summary Ana has more than 28 years of experience in several areas of the transportation field such as transportation and systems planning, computer modeling and simulation, traffic engineering, and transportation economy. She has proficient knowledge of highly specialized transportation software (Cube Voyager/Avenue/Analyst, VISSIM/ VISUM, PARAMICS, TSIS, HCS-2000/2010, and Synchro, including GIS packages). Before joining Ja-cobs, Dr. Elias worked at the McTrans Center of the University of Florida. During that time, she was involved in the development and testing of a number of important traffic simulation and optimization software packages including HCS-2000 and TRANSYT-7F, as well as working as the Deputy Project Manager for a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) beta testing project of traffic software (TSIS/CORSIM). Relevant Project Experience Technical Lead, FDOT District-wide Intermodal Systems Planning, FDOT District 6, Miami-Dade County, FL. Jacobs provides professional transportation planning services in the performance of analyses and development of specific recommendations and products to assist the District with tasks such as interchange access request (IAR) reviews, corridor and subarea studies and planning, arterial analysis, special use lanes/TSM&O planning and evaluation, and LOS analysis. The work also includes application of travel demand model(s) and/or operational simulation models as needed. Technical Lead, Modal Development Office (MDO) Consultant Service, Florida, FDOT District 6, Miami-Dade County, FL. This contract is utilized to assist the office by providing professional/ technical personnel to perform services to support the MDO. Some of the services include multimodal plans and specifications reviews, technical reports/studies reviews, multimodal inspections and reports, project site visits, multimodal inventories, transit systems safety plan reviews, transit system vehicle inventory, park and ride inventory, design services, and program administration assistance for Aviation, Intermodal, Freight, Rail, Seaport and Transit projects in Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties. Traffic and Transit Forecast and Operations Task Leader, Kendall Drive Rapid Transit PD&E Study, FDOT District 6, Miami-Dade County, FL. The general objective of this study is to provide and document information necessary for FDOT to evaluate alternatives for transit improvements within the 10-mile study corridor to determine a recommended alternative that is acceptable to stakeholders and viable for potential State and Federal grant funding. The study will document the capability of the alternatives to provide mobility, attract ridership, affect congestion, and provide a cost-effective service that supports its surrounding land uses and economic development potential. Traffic forecasts are being developed using SERPM 7 and FTA’s STOPS model is being used to forecast transit ridership; a mesoscopic Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) tool is being used to determine traffic diversion; and VISSIM microsimulation software is being used to analyze traffic and transit operations. Project Manager, SR 953/NW 42 Avenue with SR 948/NW 36 Street and SR 25/Okeechobee Road – Iron Triangle – Urban Interchange Mobility Planning Study, FDOT District 6, Miami-Dade County, FL. The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate short-term and long-term improvement concepts and detailed planning level operations for the urban interchange. The evaluation will identify a series of proposed improvements to address the existing and future mobility demand within the interchange influence area. A micro-simulation operational analysis was performed using CORSIM. Traffic Task Lead Engineer, SR 25/Okeechobee Rd from East of NW 117 Ave to East of NW 107 Ave FDOT District 6, Miami-Dade County, FL. The purpose of this project is to evaluate a segment of the proposed design from the recently completed US 27/SR 25/Okeechobee Road from SR 997/Krome Avenue to NW 79th Avenue PD&E Study. The traffic analysis will be performed using the VISSIM microsimulation software. The VISSIM model will be calibrated to the existing year conditions. Following this, design year volumes will be developed for a 2-hour peak period using the design year volumes developed for the PD&E Study as a starting point. Modifications to the proposed design will be suggested based on the results of this analysis. Senior Transportation Modeler, Strategies for the Integration of Sustainability and the Transportation System, Miami-Dade MPO, Miami- Dade County, FL. As part of a general services contract with the MPO, Jacobs was selected to identify and analyze a series of three strategies with R-12 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Ana Elias, PhD, PE, PTOE Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C the focus on reducing travel demand without increasing the transportation system supply. The SERPM Model was used to test pricing policies through a system of managed lanes and increased parking fees, examine better integration of land use and the transportation system by reallocating future population and employment growth following smart growth principles, and examining the effect of improving both the travel speed and comfort of public transit through the conversion of several local bus routes to arterial bus rapid transit and the use of timed transfers between routes. Project Manager, SR 7 from SW 8th Street to GGI Park and Ride Lot Corridor Study, FDOT District 6, Miami-Dade County, FL. Study to provide professional transportation planning, traffic operations, and environmental services for the development and evaluation of corridor alternatives to develop a recommendation for further study for a critical arterial in Miami-Dade County; namely, SR 7. The project involved a detailed compilation of existing conditions and coordination with a project advisory team (PAT) to determine a series of strategies from which viable build alternatives were developed and analyzed using a variety of planning and operational tools such as SERPM 6.5 travel demand model, VISSIM, Synchro, and LOSPLAN. The first lane elimination project in District 6 was approved by Central Office as part of the SR 7 Corridor Study. In an effort to accelerate the implementation, the lane elimination recommended improvements were incorporated into three programmed RRR. Traffic and Modeling Task Leader, SR 836/ Dolphin Expressway Southwest Extension PD&E Study, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX), Miami, FL. PD&E study conducted by the MDX to evaluate the Southwest Ex-tension of SR 836 from its current terminus at NW 137th Avenue to SW 136th Street. The new facility is envisioned as a limited access, multi-modal, tolled expressway. Several alternatives in different corridors will be considered and developed as a result of coordination with the public and permitting agencies. The project is divided into two phases, a corridor phase and an alternatives evaluation phase. Jacobs is performing the travel demand modeling, project traffic forecasting, and traffic analyses for this complex study. SERPM 6.5 will be used to develop the traffic forecasts, while Synchro, HCS, and CORSIM will be used to evaluate the No-Build and Build Alternatives. Project Manager, SR 953/LeJeune Road at SR 90/ SW 8th Street Intersection Improvement Study, Miami-Dade MPO, Miami, FL. Work order to verify the need(s) and to determine, evaluate, and document both short-term and long-term improvements for the intersection. Alternative designs and concepts were explored, such as movement restrictions and diversions with lane re-purposing and signal timing phasing adjustments to improve the safety and operations of the intersection for all modes of travel. Traffic Modeling Lead, SR 5/US 1/ S Dixie Highway from South SR 992/SW 152 St/Coral Reef Drive to SR 9/I-95, FL. The existing corridor experiences high levels of congestion which has significant impact on com-muting times. Due to dense development patterns and the adjacent transit facilities, significant widening along the corridor in order to increase capacity is not possible. The purpose of this project is to develop concepts with minimum right-of-way requirements, in order to improve person throughput along the corridor. Tasks include the collection of existing traffic data such as turning movement counts, travel time and delay studies, and origin/destination data, as well as the creation of an existing conditions model using Synchro software which includes the US 1 corridor as well as the adjacent busway. Traffic Discipline Lead, SE 17th Street Transit Study, FDOT District 4, Fort Lauderdale, FL. The study is to evaluate transit service on SE 17th Street from SR 5/US 1 east to Port Everglades, as an extension to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) approved Downtown Transit Circulator known as The Wave Streetcar. As part of this work order, the mesoscopic Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) tool developed by District 4 is being applied to determine the level of diversion expected if the typical cross-section of SE 17th Street were to be reduced by one lane. Additionally, a more detailed microscopic simulation analysis is being performed using the VISSIM software, which includes the calibration of AM and PM peak periods, and future No-Build and Build analyses with the proposed streetcar extension in place. Senior Traffic Engineer, Central Broward East- West Transit Study, Phase I, FDOT District 4, Fort Lauderdale, FL. Study developed and evaluated a series of transit corridors and modes in Central Broward County (Fort Lauderdale) to determine the most effective way to accommodate future east-west travel demand. A detailed analysis was undertaken utilizing the VISSIM microsimulation software to simulate and evaluate the traffic and transit operations along the Broward Boulevard and SR 7 corridors given the preferred alternative. Ana was Senior Technical Director of the “VISSIM/3-D Modeling Supplemental Services” task related to this project. The purpose of this task was to evaluate the future operating characteristics of SR 7 between Riverland Road and Broward Boulevard and along Broward Boulevard from SR 7 to just west of I-95 with at-grade transit service along the median of these two arterial roadways. R-13 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Juan Flores, Jr. Education PhD, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma (Candidate) MBA, Mississippi College, Jackson, Mississippi MS, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia Registrations/Certifications Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Supply Chain Management and Logistics Certificate Rutgers University, Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation Certificate Years of Experience 17 Experience Summary Juan has over 17 years of transportation planning and public/private experience working in the U.S. (Southeast & Northeast) Mexican and South American markets within supply chains, seaports/waterways and Class I & II freight rail. His responsibility includes developing the Modal Transportation business strategies to support the Southeast transportation market sector. He specifically works with state and county governments in developing planning, policy and operating procedures to meet the needs of both government and industry. Relevant Project Experience Program Manager, Miami-Dade County Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces (PROS) Planning, Design and Construction Division, Greynolds Park East Greynolds Park, Sea-Level Rise and Mitigation Study, Miami, FL. Project Manager evaluating current and future flood risk of Greynolds Park and East Greynolds Park to inform mitigation measures and adaptation strategies to reduce future flood impacts and to maintain park operations. Technical Advisor, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT District 5), SunRail GEC, Deland, FL. Technical Advisor providing services in operations and maintenance management and Positive Train Control (PTC) implementation for SunRail. Services include third-party contract oversight, assist in negotiations, coordination with the FRA, FTA, SunRail / FDOT D5 staff. Technical Advisor, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT District 6), PD&E Study on SR 94/Kendall Corridor in Miami-Dade County from SR 977 to US 1, FL. Technical Advisor for this PD&E study consisting of evaluating transit/roadway alternatives. In 2002, the SR-94/Kendall Drive Corridor (Kendall Corridor) was identified as one of eight Rapid Transit Corridors in the People’s Transportation Plan (PTP). Technical Expert, PortMiami Tunnel Mobility Evaluation Study, (FDOT District 6), Professional Services Consultant, Miami, FL. Technical Expert implementing program to monitor/assess the transportation performance of the PortMiami Tunnel in view of preserving the investment in the facility and the economic value it represents to logistics community of S. Florida, and to inform its optimal utilization from a transportation asset management perspective. Technical Expert, Florida Department of Transportation (Central Office), Districtwide Policy Consultant Services, Tallahassee, FL. Technical expert in documenting best practices and procedures for statewide planning processes. Responsibilities include documentation of existing processes, identification of opportunities to streamline project development activities, and supporting development of resource materials to outline guidance and best practices for planning processes, and interoffice coordination with Systems Implementation, Policy Planning and Environmental Management. Technical Adviser, Miami-Dade MPO, SR 953/LeJeune Road at SR 90/SW 8th Street Intersection Improvement Study, Miami, FL. Technical adviser to verify the need(s) and to determine, evaluate, and document both short-term and long-term modal improvements for the intersection. Alternative designs and concepts were explored, such as movement restrictions and diversions with lane re-purposing and signal timing phasing adjustments to improve the safety and operations of the intersection for all modes of travel. Technical Adviser, Miami-Dade TPO, Strategies for the Integration of Sustainability and Transportation System, Miami-Dade County, FL. Technical adviser as part of a general services contract to identify and analyze a series of three strategies with the focus on reducing travel demand without increasing the transportation system supply. Planning services also include performance of analyses and development of specific recommendations and products to assist with tasks such as interchange access request (IAR) reviews, corridor, subarea planning studies, arterial analysis, special use lanes/TSM&O planning and evaluation. Project Manager, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT D1), Districtwide Systems Planning (Port/Freight Services), Bartow, FL. Project Manager of the Freight Mobility and Transportation Plan (FMTP), working with elements that include freight (highway, rail, seaport, aviation) R-14 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Juan Flores, Jr. Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C mobility planning related tasks, as well as freight logistics business research-oriented tasks. Working with Port Manatee for needed capacity enhancements within port master planning and development objectives. Technical Advisor, Airglades International Airport (AIA) - Airport Perishable/Cargo Complex, On-Call Engineering and Planning Services, Hendry County, FL. Technical Advisor for the freight and cargo planning services during construction phase of this project. Services being developed to provide a permanent one-stop facility for perishable air-cargo entering the U.S. specifically designed by industry stakeholders. The facility Airglades complex will provide long-term for perishable air cargo growth. Technical Advisor, City of Largo, Florida, Downtown Largo Multimodal Transportation Plan, FL. Technical Advisor for the Multimodal Plan which serves as a pilot project for developing mobility strategies to be potentially applied Citywide to support the Strategic Plan. The strategies recommended in the Multimodal Plan include policies that will be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Development Code amendments, and future capital improvement projects, including the Capital Improvement Programs. Additionally, a comprehensive public engagement strategy was developed to ensure public support. Technical Advisor, Hillsborough County Metropolitan Planning Organization General Planning Consultant, FL. Technical Advisor for the MPOs 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Needs Assessment to identify transportation needs for 2040. Strategic approach implemented of transportation needs, emphasis five different investment categories. Each emphasis area aligned and satisfies federal requirements evaluating the need for investment in system preservations, safety, alternatives to driving, congestion, and major projects. Technical Advisor, Broward Metropolitan Planning Organization Public Engagement Services, FL. Technical Advisor for the Broward MPO identifying public engagement activities through outreach efforts to increase public understanding of the logistics industry and facilitating exchanges of information sharing. “Speak Up Broward”, included communication/public engagement activities, transportation and public opinion research, financial analyses, scenario planning in coordination with the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Update. Technical Advisor, Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT), Texas-Mexico International Bridges and Border crossings, Austin, TX. Technical Advisor for Texas and Mexico Border crossing study for the TXDOT. The Texas and Mexico share 1,254 miles of common border and are joined my 28 international bridges and border crossings. Services include border analysis of the existing transportation systems (roadway, freight, rail, marine), corridor feasibility analysis, relief route studies, and multimodal analysis. Technical Advisor, Savannah-Metropolitan Planning Commission Mobility and Transportation Report, Savannah, GA. Technical Advisor for the Savannah Metropolitan Planning Commission (MPC) the study investigated accessibility and connectivity between a proposed logistics center and the Port of Savannah. This study implemented GDOTs freight and seaport plan to for increased investment by the state. Technical Advisor, TxDOT TP&P, Statewide Corridor Planning Contract, Austin, TX. Technical Adviser for this $25M indefinite deliverable contract providing contract/project management/oversight and quality management for 14 work authorizations. Also led technical planning analysis aspects for US 281 and I-30 corridor studies. Performed professional planning activities on as needed basis to perform transportation planning services associated with MPO administration. Technical Advisor, Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT), State Rail Planning Services statewide, Atlanta, GA. Technical Advisor for the funding, policy and transportation economics. The Statewide Rail plan will be developed through the integration of several project tasks including: an inventory of the existing freight and passenger rail system, analysis of the rail’s economic impact to GA, condition and evaluation of state-owned lines, planning, data collection and asset inventory. R-15 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Rick Gorsira, ENV SP Education BS, Zoology, University of Florida Registrations/Certifications Wetland Delineator (provisional): U.S Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Florida Envision Professional Years of Experience 39 Experience Summary Rick Gorsira is experienced in ecological assessments, stormwater, surface water, groundwater, and sediment sampling design, wetland delineation, and wildlife assessments. He has expertise in monitoring wellfield withdrawal impacts on wetland hydrology and other water supply projects. Rick has extensive experience in aerial photo-interpretation, hydroperiod assessments, water supply and reuse water recharge applications, and ERP permitting of water supply projects. Relevant Project Experience Ecologist, Paradise Run 50-mgd Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Technology Demonstration Project, SFWMD, FL. Supervised ecological field site reconnaissance to support planning and conceptual design of the Paradise Run ASR Demonstration System, which is proposed as a 10-well, 50-mgd surface water storage facility on the Kissimmee River/C-38 just downstream of S-65E. Information was needed to assess potential ecological impacts on wetlands associated with the proposed constructed wetland system to serve as an initial pretreatment prior to water storage in the upper and middle Floridan aquifer in stacked ASR wells. Participated in field surveys designed to confirm presence of threatened and endangered wildlife species within the project site footprint. Project Scientist/Quality Control Analyst, Wellfield, City of Fort Myers, FL. Conducted a study for the City’s wellfield to assess operational effects of the shallow wells on the surrounding wetland communities and hydrology. This wellfield was augmented with surface water from the Caloosahatchee River, which was pumped to infiltration galleries within the wellfield. The wellfield operation has since been modified to deeper artesian/Floridan aquifer sources to accommodate the growing demand on the water supply. Monitoring demonstrated that augmentation of the wellfield has limited the extent of hydrological impact and has resulted in positive impacts on the forested wetlands within the wellfield. Project Manager, Water Use Permit Monitoring, Bonita Springs Utilities, FL. Monitored wetland habitat to assess the impact of water withdrawals of two wellfields as part of a Consumptive Use Permit. Led bi-annual assessment of vegetation and hydrologic response to operation of the wells located in the Tamiami aquifer. Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method assessments were performed on a bi-annual basis to determine the effects of wellfield operation during the dry and wet seasons. Successfully negotiated with the South Florida Water Management District to reduce monitoring requirements, resulting in significant cost savings to the client. Senior Scientist/Ecologist, Compliance Monitoring Program for Tampa Bay Water Bill Young Regional Water Supply Reservoir, Hillsborough County, FL. Currently involved with a semi-annual habitat monitoring program for the construction of the Tampa Bay Regional Reservoir. A total of 12 transects were established within floodplain wetlands of adjacent creeks to assess baseline conditions. Based on the current monitoring data, operational effects from the reservoir will be determined as the system comes online. The monitoring stations were established with the goal of assessing the potential hydrological effects on the nearby vegetation communities and downstream habitats. Project is ongoing. Project Manager, Stormwater Canal Sediment Removal, Pinellas County, FL. Provided permitting services for the removal of accumulated sediment in the stormwater outfall canals at 16 locations within the County. Ecological studies were conducted of the stormwater canals to assess impacts to wetlands, listed species, and water quality, especially receiving waters to assess impacts from proposed sediment removal. Developed innovative strategies for permitting which resulted in channel geometry improvements and slope stabilization to reduce sediment load and reduce future maintenance within these stormwater canals in Pinellas County. Lead Scientist, Northwest Five Watershed Management Plan Update, Hillsborough County, FL. Conducted field investigations for devising BMPs for Northwest Five Watersheds, which included four different watersheds Rocky Brushy, Sweetwater/ Lower Sweetwater, Double Branch and Brooker Creek. Assessments were conducted post-summer floods to respond to citizen concerns and investigate potential impediments to stormwater conveyance. As a result of these investigations, Hillsborough County requested development of a comprehensive R-16 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Rick Gorsira, ENV SP Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C sediment management plan. A statistical approach will be used to identify and optimize sediment management in the watersheds. Overall goal is to reduce sediment management by targeting specific areas, reducing upstream flooding in the watershed. Lead Scientist, Crews Lake Natural Systems Restoration, Pasco County, FL. Prepared a plan of study for the Crews Lake Natural Systems Restoration project which will use hydrologically- altered wetlands in Crews Lake to receive Pasco County reclaimed water for storage of wet-weather flow as allowed under the Wetlands Application Rule, Ch. 62 611, FAC. Baseline monitoring requirements will involve water and sediment quality, biological community composition, and hydrologic characterization for one year as required in the rule. Project Manager, McKay Creek Sediment Analysis and Nutrient Reduction Credit, Pinellas County, FL. A sediment assessment was performed within McKay creek to evaluate the potential to receive reduction credits towards the TMDL based on the sediment nitrogen load to the estuarine segment of the creek and sediments were characterized to determine to determine the disposal options and provide information to contractors for sediment removal with equipment. Project Manager, Kissimmee Lakes Littoral Zone, South Florida Water Management District, Osceola County, FL. Performed a littoral zone study of the four Kissimmee River headwater lakes (Cypress, Hatchineha, Kissimmee, and Tiger). Study was designed to document littoral zone vegetative community conditions as a baseline for future monitoring of ecological response to the proposed implementation of the Headwaters Revitalization Water Regulation schedule. Species level vegetation cover of the littoral zone and FLUCCS cover of the upland transects were recorded on a PC tablet with a database application. Airboat access and use of innovative field data documentation technologies were an essential element of this project. Transect and quadrat replication was analyzed to ensure statistical power of the data was adequate to support future monitoring efforts of change in vegetation community characteristics. Fire Hydrant Inspector, Galvanized Pipe Replacement Program Management, Pinellas County, FL. Performed inspections and testing of the replaced pipe and other utilities. Project Scientist/Quality Control Analyst, Ave Maria Reclaimed Water System Wetland Storage Project, Collier County, FL. Conducted routine monitoring of the water quality, vegetation, soils, fish, invertebrate, wildlife and surface and groundwater water levels of hydrologically impacted cypress and marsh wetlands near Immokalee. Responsibilities included field platform maintenance, well sampling, logistics planning, water quality sampling and quality control review, vegetation and wildlife data collection, office data base input and quality control review, analysis, and report preparation. Environmental Scientist, Drainage Feasibility Analysis, City of West Palm Beach, FL. Assisted the City in a feasibility analysis on routing surface drainage through a 640-acre parcel as part of the water catchment area (WCA), the City's water supply. Mapping of wetland and upland communities, exotic species cover, determination of wetland hydroperiods, and assessment of protected plant and animal species were conducted to evaluate potential impacts of the proposed project on biological resources in the WCA. This information will be used to develop a framework and criteria for evaluating similar systems for incorporation into the WCA. Senior Environmental Scientist, Monitoring, City of Cocoa, FL. Provided assistance to the City with the quarterly monitoring of vegetation communities to determine the response to surface water withdrawals from the Taylor Creek Reservoir in Osceola County. The monitoring was part of the 3-year baseline ecological monitoring for the City's Consumptive Use Permit (CUP). Environmental Scientist, NPDES Permitting, Englewood Water District, FL. Coordinated and obtained a renewal of a NPDES permit for the emergency discharge of brine wastes of a reverse osmosis plant. Historical data review and performance data were critical components to obtain specific waivers established by the permitting agencies for issuance of the permit. Environmental Scientist, Hydroperiod Study, Northwest Hillsborough County, FL. Implemented a study of hydroperiods of wetland habitats, including wildlife use of wetlands and lakes within selected well fields within Northwest Hillsborough County. Prepared reports and data summaries for administrative hearings for water use permitting on behalf of regional water suppliers in southwest Florida. R-17 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Robert Grubel Education BS Civil Engineering, Florida Atlantic University BS Psychology, University of Florida Registrations/Certifications American Society of Civil Engineers Years of Experience 14 Experience Summary Robert Grubel is a traffic engineer skilled in numerous state-of-the-industry modeling tools. His skills extend to modeling, analyzing, and analyzing numerous traffic scenarios. He was responsible for updating the Southeast Regional Planning Model (SERPM) version 6.5 network to include project Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) and mixed-use land use data. He has worked throughout the state of Florida most recently on the Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study and Collier County 2045 LRTP for Collier County. Relevant Project Experience Traffic Engineer – Synchro Model Design, Traffic Analysis, Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study, Collier County, FL. As the traffic engineer on this project, Robert was responsible for assessing potential innovative intersection alternatives, modeling corridor intersection alternatives in Synchro, and conducting traffic impact analysis. Traffic Engineer – CUBE Model Design, Traffic Analysis, Indian Point Charter School Traffic Impact Analysis, Osceola County, FL. Updated the OUATS 2040 network to include project Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) and land use data in order to obtain project trip distribution percentages. Performed roadway capacity directional peak hour link level of service analyses for existing, background, and build-out conditions. Analyzed intersection levels of service using Highway Capacity Software (HCS). Performed Back of Queue analysis in order to determine whether or not site storage was sufficient for peak hour demand. Traffic Engineer – Traffic Analysis, Collier County 2045 LRTP, Collier County, FL. The project involves developing Existing + Committed projects, performing region wide model deficiency analysis with Collier County CIGM data, and updating and running region wide model alternatives with Collier County CIGM data. Traffic Engineer – Synchro Model Design, Traffic Analysis, Traffic Access Analysis, Escambia County, FL. Responsible for modeling corridor intersections in Synchro to examine the outcomes of multiple scenarios, analyzing traffic impacts of proposed traffic signal, and preparing technical memorandum documenting analysis methods and conclusions. Traffic Engineer – CORSIM Model Design, Traffic Analysis, American Dream Miami Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Traffic Impact Analysis, Miami, FL. Updated the Southeast Regional Planning Model (SERPM) version 6.5 network to include project Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) and mixed-use land use data. Also performed multiple model runs for short-term and long-term scenarios, updated CORSIM micromodel to identify project impacts on I-75 and local facilities, calculated turning movement volumes (TMV) for over 50 study area intersections. Traffic Engineer – CUBE Model Development, Central Florida Regional Planning Model (CFRPM) Version 6 Development (Cube Voyager), Orlando, FL. Developed cost feasible travel demand model networks for all future years included in the long-range scope (2015, 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040). Supervised staff in the coding of highway network changes, including new roadways, lane widenings, attribute updates (facility type, etc), turn penalties, and toll updates. Coded in transit network updates for all future years. Derived socioeconomic data sets for all interim years. Traffic Engineer – Synchro Model Design, Traffic Analysis, Twin Creeks Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) Analysis (Synchro), St. Johns County, FL. Completed Synchro roadway network simulations which included 17 intersections for Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 scenarios. Optimized intersection signal timing to improve levels of service. Analyzed project traffic impacts in order to determine intersection mitigation and geometry improvements for each development phase. Traffic Engineer – CUBE Model Development, Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study (OUATS) 2040 Development (Cube Voyager), Orlando, Osceola, and Seminole Counties, FL. Assisted in the completion of all model networks included in the long-range scope (Existing + Committed, Cost Feasible 2020, 2025, 2030, 2040, and Needs 2040). Coded numerous highway network roadway improvements. Coded in transit network updates for all future years. Executed scripts to aid in the efficiency of model coding. R-18 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Robert Grubel Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Traffic Engineer – Traffic Analysis, Bella Lago Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Traffic Impact Analysis, Osceola County, FL. Determined trip generation for a mixed land use development using a combination of site traffic counts and Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) methodology. Performed roadway capacity directional peak hour link level of service analyses for currently constructed and total approved project development conditions. Assessed project traffic impacts in order to determine proportionate share costs. R-19 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Jonathan Heiss, GISP Education MA, Urban & Regional Planning; SUNY at Albany, Albany, NY BA, Environmental Studies; Unity College, Unity, ME Registrations/Certifications Geographic Information Systems Professional (GISP), Certification, #90601 Years of Experience 13 Experience Summary Jonathan Heiss specializes in environmental impact assessment and documentation for transportation and transit projects, as well as compliance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) related policies and procedures. He is skilled in environmental permit applications and permit compliance oversight, attending and participating in various Project meetings; developing and continually updating the Project Environmental Compliance Tracking Database; ensuring environmental permit compliance with field inspections; and utilizing GIS software to review contractor deliverables as well as to incorporate Project environmentally-related geospatial data into an existing geodatabase. Relevant Project Experience GIS Specialist, FDOT Rail Crossing Inventory, Florida Department of Transportation, various counties in Florida. Jonathan assisted the Jacobs GIS team with utilizing aerial imagery to digitize road crossings, crossing width, nearest intersections as part of the initial effort of the inventory crossing project for FDOT. Jonathan also assisted in the follow-up field survey collection efforts throughout the state. Environmental Specialist, Rhode Island Tolling Project, Rhode Island Department of Transportation, various locations in Rhode Island. Jonathan provides GIS services for the environmental team, including incorporating design files into field figures and permit application figures along with GIS files of environmental interest from various sources. Jonathan also utilizes GIS in conducing analysis of any potential impacts to environmental resources from proposed construction impacts. Environmental Planner/GIS Specialist, Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project, Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, VA. Jonathan coordinates quarterly updates to the Project’s Record of Decision mitigation measures with Project Staff. He reviews geospatial data delivered to the Project within a GIS. For permit compliance and conformance tracking, he has developed and continually updates the Project Environmental Compliance Tracking Database. Jonathan assists in reviewing environmental documentation for Phase 2 of the Project and participating in any follow-up comment resolution meetings pertaining to those deliverables with the Contractors. He assists in the development and distribution of environmental training materials to Project staff. Environmental Planner, SR 95 Realignment Study, I-40 to SR 68, Arizona Department of Transportation, AZ. Investigation of realignment to SR 95 in northwest Arizona, Mohave County from I-40 to SR 68. Jonathan attends Interdisciplinary Design Team (IDT) and related project meetings. He served as part of a Jacobs’s team providing the environmental as well as the public involvement portions of the study. He also assisted in coordination between the cooperating and participating agencies. Jonathan’s GIS contributions to the project included creating maps which highlight the project vicinity. GIS Specialist, Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority Enterprise GIS, VA. Jonathan assisted in developing a GIS system for the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) including new datasets, and a web GIS viewer application for the Authority staff. He served on the Jacobs team developing and testing the web GIS application. He attended project meetings and drafted and reviewed various technical documents. Environmental Planner, On-Call Statewide Environmental Investigations, Arizona Department of Transportation, AZ. As part of the On-Call Statewide Environmental Investigations contract with the Arizona Department of Transportation, Jonathan prepared environmental clearances for transportation projects around the state ranging from pavement preservation to bridge repairs and intersection projects. He drafted Environmental Determinations and Categorical Exclusions to provide environmental clearances for the various projects and also assisted the Jacobs Public Involvement Team with preparing and participating in public outreach meetings as part of the On-Call contract. Environmental Planner, CDBG HUD NEPA Site- Specifics, City of Phoenix, AZ. Jonathan led the efforts in conducting and delivering US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Environmental Assessments for specific neighborhoods within the City of Phoenix, slated for HUD neighborhood redevelopment funds. The process for completing the HUD EAs included research of online databases, field surveys, and meetings with the client. R-20 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Jonathan Heiss, GISP Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Environmental Specialist, MassDOT Rail Permitting, Massachusetts Department of Transit, Rail and Transit Division, various locations in Massachusetts. Jonathan provided environmental permitting and GIS services for the environmental team, including environmental research using GIS data and creating associated figures within permit applications.GIS Specialist, MBTA Snow Removal GIS, Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority, various locations in Massachusetts. Jonathan assisted the MBTA Rail Jacobs team with updating the snow removal tracking layer using latest station design for the Green Line expansion as well as other snow removal area updates from the team engineer. Environmental Specialist, New Bedford Harbor Superfund Site Pierce Mill Cover Intertidal Remediation Plan Addendum, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New Bedford, MA. Jonathan assists on various GIS tasks for the Addendum of the Pierce Mill Cove Intertidal Remediation Plan. Such tasks include spatial analysis of proposed elevations as part of the restoration of Pierce Mill Cove using ESRI ArcGIS Spatial Analyst and 3D Analyst extensions, along with creating new proposed vegetation zones using bathymetry post-dredging survey points, field survey GPS points, and aerial imagery from various sources. R-21 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Tara Jones, PE Education BS, Civil Engineering, University of Central Florida BS, Environmental Engineering, University of Central Florida Registrations/Certifications Professional Engineer: Florida (#54680) Years of Experience +16 Experience Summary Tara Jones has more than 16 years of experience on complex highway/bridge PD&E studies in Florida. She has expertise in developing Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), Environmental Assessments (EAs), and Categorical Exclusions as well as in developing Section 4(f) and Section 106 evaluations. Tara’s background includes public involvement, community awareness, and project environmental services. Relevant Project Experience Deputy Project Manager, Collier MPO, 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan, Collier County, FL. The Jacobs team is working with the Collier MPO to complete the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan update identifying implementable projects through 2045. The update includes developing a land-use alternative and socioeconomic data for 2045, analyzing modeling results and recommending alternative projects, developing costs of the new projects, refinement of the goals, objectives, policies, and performance measures and evaluating potential projects; development of a Needs Plan and Cost Feasible Plan and LRTP documentation. The team initiated a virtual public engagement program to reach out the stakeholders, agency representatives, elected officials, and the community during the update. Deputy Project Manager, Port Manatee Connector Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study, FDOT District One, Manatee and Hillsborough Counties, FL. Currently serving as deputy project manager on this PD&E study to develop and evaluate viable alternatives that will improve goods movement and traffic flow between I-75 and Port Manatee. The project will involve a corridor analysis, an EIS, and the evaluation of numerous environmental constraints including wetlands, floodplains, cultural resources, threatened and endangered species, hazardous waste sites, and public lands. Public involvement includes extensive consensus-building with the Manatee County Port Authority, agency stakeholders, and project stakeholders including environmental special interest groups, major developers, and approximately 2,000 property owners. Project Manager, Immokalee Road (CR 846) at Randall Boulevard Intersection PD&E Study, FDOT District One, Collier County, FL. Manages this PD&E study that involves the preparation of a Categorical Exclusion (to be determined) for potential interim at-grade intersection improvement and ultimate grade-separated interchange improvements to meet future travel demand. The development of intersection improvement alternatives involved a comparative evaluation based on engineering constraints, environmental effects, and preliminary cost estimates. Constraints have included minimizing impacts to canals, access, utilities, and right-of-way. Project Coordinator, Polk Rail Study, FDOT District One, Polk County, FL. Responsible for document control, document coordination, public involvement support (including displays, website development and maintenance, newsletters, and meeting participation and summaries), and management support activities (subconsultant coordination, invoicing, and progress reporting). The purpose of the study is to identify potential projects, improvements, and strategies to address community concerns related to freight rail services in Polk County. This study involves an initial investigation (Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis) that includes route alignment options, funding proposals, rail operations analysis, and environmental impact studies to be undertaken prior to the PD&E study. The study has involved an extensive public outreach program involving 6 counties and 19 cities. Alternatives considered have included both potential short-term and long-term solutions. Short-term solutions included the evaluation of grade separations, rail crossing signal preemption, quiet zones, and geometric track improvements. Project Engineer, Englewood Interstate Corridor PD&E Study, FDOT District One, Sarasota and Charlotte Counties, FL. Working as a subconsultant to Wilbur Smith and Associates, provided support to facilitate environmental documentation and public involvement. Assisted with the development of the Type II CE document and public involvement activities. Deputy Project Manager, I-95 PD&E Study from SR 514 to SR 50, FDOT District Five, Brevard County, FL. Responsible for overall project coordination for this 43-mile study. The project included preparation of a Type II CE for the six-lane widening which required extensive coordination with FDOT, other local and regional agencies, and consultants. Responsible for coordination of public R-22 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Tara Jones, PE Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C involvement, engineering analyses, and preparation of environmental and engineering documents. Project Manager, US 441 (SR 500) (North of SR 46 to SR 44) PD&E Study, FDOT District Five, Lake County, FL. Responsible for a diverse team of consultants for the PD&E study to widen US 441 from four to six lanes. Environmental constraints included minimizing impact to farmlands, avoiding Section 4(f) resources, and minimizing the ROW footprint. Issues involved determining the appropriate design speed; evaluating the rural, suburban, and urban typical sections; laying out the southern tie-in to the existing four-lane rural section and to the future Wekiva Parkway high-speed urban typical section, changing the access management classification. Environmental Coordinator, Wekiva Parkway Corridor Consultant Services PD&E Study, Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority and FDOT District Five, Orange Lake and Seminole Counties, FL. Project involved 25-mile limited-access toll facility (four lanes, expandable to six lanes) on new alignment that will complete the Western Beltway around the metropolitan Orlando area. Responsibilities included preparation of an EA, Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation for affected public lands, and Individual Section 4(f) Evaluation for Section 106 historic resources. The Wekiva Parkway PD&E was downgraded from an EIS to an EA based on early project coordination with the Federal Highway Administration on the Class of Action. Deputy Project Manager, SR 415 PD&E Study, FDOT District Five, Seminole and Volusia Counties, FL. Served as deputy project manager for PD&E–level engineering, environmental, and public involvement services for proposed improvements to SR 415 from SR 46 to SR 44, a 28-mile segment. Project issues for this study included establishing project need, determining drainage/environmental requirements with associated right-of-way needs, assessing permitting issues and environmental constraints including the preparation of a Categorical Exclusion, and determining bridge considerations for final design. The project also included the evaluation of a separate, paved multi-use trail facility within the SR 415 corridor, and the development of a proactive public involvement program. Project Manager, I-95/Pineda Causeway Extension Interchange PD&E Study, FDOT District Five, Brevard County, FL. Managed this study which consisted of the preparation of a Categorical Exclusion for the proposed I-95 interchange with the Pineda Causeway Extension, a controlled access facility. Involved coordination with FDOT, local and regional agencies, consultants, and a comprehensive public involvement program. Deputy Project Manager, SR 46 Lake Jesup Bridge Replacement PD&E Study, FDOT District Five, Seminole County, FL. Served as deputy project manager and implemented a public involvement program for the replacement of the SR 46 Bridge over Lake Jesup (a major bridge improvement). Responsible for the preparation of engineering and environmental documents to complete a Type II CE. Stakeholders, including the Friends of Lake Jesup, acknowledged that the community values were successfully integrated in the selection of the preferred alternative. Project Coordinator, SR 528 PD&E Study, FDOT District Five, Orange and Brevard Counties, FL. Served as project coordinator for PD&E–level engineering, environmental, and public involvement services for proposed improvements to SR 528 from SR 520 to Port Canaveral’s Terminal B interchange, a 24-mile segment. Study elements included establishing project need, developing interchange modifications, evaluating causeway access management options, determining drainage/environmental requirements with associated right-of-way needs, assessing environmental constraints including the preparation of a Categorical Exclusion and Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation, and determining bridge considerations. The project also included evaluation of a separate, paved multi-use trail facility within the corridor and a proactive public involvement program. R-23 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Robert Paquin, PE Education BCE, Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota BS, Physics, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Registrations/Certifications N/A Years of Experience 4 Experience Summary Robert Paquin is a civil engineer with experience relative to traffic and transportation engineering. His responsibilities include systemic safety planning and analyses which utilize mapping tools and spreadsheets to perform calculations. Robert performs studies that contrast Before and After scenarios of vehicle travel times, capacity and property access by means of field reviews, time trials and micro- and macroscopic modeling software. He is adept at research existing literature and cite the overall effectiveness of current roadway safety improvement strategies within summary documents. Relevant Project Experience Lead Analyst, Lee County MPO Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Analysis, Lee County FL. This project involves an analysis of the current state of pedestrian and bicycle crashes and the relative safety performance of the public roadways within the boundaries of Lee County Florida. Spatial analyses and of crash and roadway attributes were conducted in order to potentially identify patterns of where crashes appear to be overrepresented with respect to the public roadway system. The findings and suggested countermeasures are currently being documented and reviewed. Lead Analyst, Seminole Tribe of Florida Systemic Safety Plan, Seminole Tribe of Florida, Hollywood, FL. Systemic and high-crash analysis, system wide prioritization and safety project development for identified at-risk locations in both rural and urban environments. Supplemental Highway Safety Manual analysis. GIS network and crash data management and maintenance. Lead Analyst & Deputy Project Manager, MnDOT Right-of-Way Assistance – Cannon Mall, Cannon Falls, Goodhue County, MN. This project is focused on the change in access to a parcel in a study contrasting Before and After scenarios. The Before/After study compares travel times and vehicle delay for multiple scenarios. Travel time data was acquired by manual data collection through travel time trials and calculated using SimTraffic. Analyst, County Road Safety Plan Updates, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, MN. Meeting facilitator, literature synthesis, data collection, analysis and management. Produce updates to existing county network safety plans through new levels of engagement and outreach and systemic and hot spot analyses developing proactive countermeasures in rural and urban areas. Lead Analyst & Deputy Project Manager, Hennepin County Tort Law – Expert Witness Services Hennepin County, Medina, MN. This unique project involves a Minnesota Tort Law and working with the facts from the time of a fatal crash in order to justify the County’s compliance with standards of practice and did not act negligent and are not liable for the cause of the crash. Lead Analyst & Deputy Project Manager, MnDOT Right-of-Way Assistance - Park Vacuum and National Tire and Battery, St. Louis Park, MN. This project is focused on the change in access to a parcel in a study contrasting Before and After scenarios. The Before/After study compares travel times and vehicle delay for multiple scenarios. Travel time data was acquired by manual data collection through travel time trials and calculated using SimTraffic. Lead Analyst & Deputy Project Manager, MnDOT Right-of-Way Assistance – Black Stallion Restaurant, Hampton, MN. This project is focused on the change in access to a parcel in a study contrasting Before and After scenarios. The Before/After study compares travel times and vehicle delay for multiple scenarios. Travel time data was acquired by manual data collection through travel time trials and calculated using SimTraffic. Lead Analyst & Deputy Project Manager, Anoka County Right-of-Way Assistance, Anoka County, Anoka, MN. This project focused on the change in access to a parcel in a study contrasting Before and After scenarios. The Before/After study compared travel times and vehicle delay for each scenario. Travel time data was calculated using SimTraffic and verified through SimTraffic. R-24 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Robert Paquin, PE Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Lead Analyst & Deputy Project Manager, MnDOT District 3 Right-of-Way Assistance, MnDOT District 3, Rice, MN. This project focused on the change in access to a parcel in a study contrasting Before and After scenarios. The Before/After study compared travel times and vehicle delay for each scenario. Travel time data was calculated using SimTraffic and verified through SimTraffic. Analyst, District Safety Plans Update, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, MN. Data collection, data analysis, literature synthesis and data management. Produce updates to existing state system safety plans through a combination of systemic and black spot analyses, developing proactive and reactive projects for rural and urban areas. Lead Analyst, Minnesota District 3 Rural Intersection Conflict Warning System (RICWS), Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, MN. Field visit, data collection, data analysis and data management. This was a “Before/After” analysis of 27 implemented RICWS locations around the state of Minnesota. 30 control sites were selected for the before/after comparison. The primary conclusion from this study suggests the RICWS sites increase safety performance under a certain volume threshold. This conclusion supports that conventional intersection alternative (i.e. installation of traffic signals) are not a cost effective measure of reducing severe right-angle crashes. Analyst, City Street Risk Assessment – Pilot, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, MN. Analysis of Twin Cities metropolitan crash data, systemic assessment of city jurisdiction streets, identification of risk factors or characteristics associated with severe crashes, and the identification of potential proactive and reactive vehicular and pedestrian/bicyclist safety projects for the pilot cities, Saint Paul and Eagan. Analyst, Local Road Safety Program, North Dakota Department of Transportation, Bismarck, ND. Data collection, data analysis, data management and project delivery. Through the approximate 2-year duration, the project contained approximately $55M of suggested HSIP-qualifying infrastructure safety improvement projects on local roads, intersections and curves. Projects were developed through a systemic risk analysis. Engaged all 53 counties, 12 of the largest cities (population greater than 5,000 people), 4 sovereign reservations and one National Park to better position the local agencies to compete for HSIP funding. Analyst, Minnesota Highway Safety Manual Calibration, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, MN. Data analysis and statistical evaluation. Developed Minnesota- specific calibration factors for segments and various intersection types on rural expressways and rural two-lane, two-way roadways on the Trunk Highway system. R-25 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Avi Patwardhan, PhD, BCEEM Education PhD, Bio-Systems Engineering, University of Minnesota, USA MS, Agricultural Engineering, University of Manitoba, Canada B.Tech, Agricultural Engineering, MPAU University, India Registrations/Certifications Board Certified Environmental Engineer Member Professional Hydrologist Years of Experience 30 Experience Summary Dr. Patwardhan is Managing Director of Jacobs’ Smart Cities Practice. With 30 years of problem- solving, systematic thinking, and delivering high quality results using best-in-class collaborative style. Experience for 50+ clients in North America and overseas—both in the public (local, state and federal) and private sectors, Dr. Patwardhan’s passion is spotlighting how emerging technologies are impacting cities, utilities and organizations as they plan, build, and manage infrastructure assets. Using time-honored best practices and cutting-edge technologies from different business sectors and geographies around the globe, Dr. Patwardhan has spent his career helping dramatically improve the quality of life for hundreds of thousands of people— from water resource allocation, sustainability planning, smart and connected place transformations, economic development, and real time asset management. Dr. Patwardhan holds two U.S. patents for Water Quality Trading & Method System for Evaluating Water Usage. Relevant Project Experience Senior Consultant, Miami Beach Smart Street Lighting, Miami, FL. Developing a Smart Cities road map which includes evaluating connected places services and alternatives, scheduling and financial options for implementation. Senior Consultant, City of Peachtree Corners Internet of Things Solutions, Peachtree Corners, GA. Currently overseeing the work and solutions being designed and implemented on the project and providing advice of aligned technologies to be implemented. Senior Consultant, City of Peachtree Corners Smart City Application. Peachtree Corners, GA. Senior Consultant leading a team in developing an APP for Citizens for all City Services, APP developed for IOS and DROID systems. Senior Consultant, City of the Future – West Corridor Feasibility Study, Metropolitan District of Greater Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH. Dr. Patwardhan served as Senior Consultant and provided solutions for various green infrastructure solutions for the West Corridor Feasibility Study. Senior Consultant, AURIC, Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor, Maharashtra, India. Responsible for reviewing and providing recommendations for developing and deploying smart city ICT solutions for AURIC Smart City. Leading efforts in developing an overall ICT and sustainability strategy and provide technology recommendations for physical infrastructure. Engaged in providing guidance for developing a connected places roadmap aligned with Smart Cities vision which will integrate various citizen services such as water, mobility, energy, waste management and connectivity with IoT enabled solutions. Senior Consultant, Capital City Amaravati Andhra Pradesh Capital Regions Development Authority, India. Engaged in reviewing and providing recommendations for Programme Office Set Up, Governance documents, Work Break Down Structure. Project Manager, Masdar Sustainable City, UAE. Led the development and implementation of Web- Enabled Sustainability Management System. R-26 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Chad Polk, PE Education BS, Civil Engineering, University of Missouri Registrations/Certifications Professional Engineer: Florida (#68024), Missouri (#2008002198) Years of Experience 18 Experience Summary Chad Polk has broad experience in a variety of highway planning and design projects including preliminary and final design, crash analysis, safety improvement, pavement design, preparation of resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation (RRR) reports, preparation of variations/exceptions, intersection designs, geometric design, cost estimating, construction duration estimating, and preparation of specifications. He is experienced in Highway Safety Manual methodologies, including predictive safety analyses. Relevant Project Experience Project Engineer, I-4 Beyond the Ultimate Section 2, FDOT District Five. Project engineer for addition of express lanes to the freeway. The project includes improvements to one system interchange and two service interchanges. The interchange at I-4 and Sand Lake Road include a diverging diamond interchange. Project Engineer, General Engineering Consultant, FDOT District Seven. Assisted in supporting a 5-year, $20M General Engineering Consultant (GEC) contract with FDOT District 7. Responsibilities for the contract included scope and staff hour development/negotiation with consultants, plans review, and annual work program update assistance. Project Engineer, NCHRP 15-50, Guidelines for Integrating Safety and Cost-Effectiveness into Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects, Transportation Research Board. Co-Author of report to develop updated guidelines for integrating safety and cost effectiveness into resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation projects. Safety Implementation Lead, Strategic Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP2) Implementation, AASHTO. The SHRP2 implementation includes working with FHWA, AASHTO, TRB, and state DOTs to examine more than 100 completed research projects and use the findings to implement accelerated planning and project development, and travel time reliability and safety in standard practice at state DOTs and for other users The project team led a group of industry experts to deliver this program. Provided coordination of logistics and schedule for key safety stakeholders involved in the program. Project Engineer, I-75 Design-Build, FDOT District One. Project engineer for widening 30 miles of interstate from four lanes to six lanes in Southwest Florida. Responsibilities included roadway design, maintenance of traffic, and preparation of construction plans. Project Engineer, SR 17 Drainage Improvements, FDOT District One. Project Engineer for roadway design tasks as part of a FDOT District 1 District- wide drainage task assignment. Responsibilities included the design of roadway plans to upgrade the drainage system between SR 17 and First Street. Project Engineer, US 41 / Florida Avenue RRR, Tampa, FL. RRR design of 3 miles through downtown. Challenges of project included a pavement design for asphalt overlay on brick, granite curb throughout project, limited right-of-way, numerous utility conflicts, below criteria vertical curves, and reduction of lane widths to accommodate bicycle lanes. Project Engineer, SR 699 / Gulf Boulevard RRR, FDOT District Seven. RRR design of 1.8 miles of state highway within a beach community. The project implemented countermeasures to improve pedestrian safety for this tourist friendly area. Responsibilities included preparation of six design variations, RRR Report, pavement design, and preparation of construction plans. QC Reviewer, Himes Avenue and Kirby Street Intersection Improvements Design, Hillsborough County, FL. Provided quality control reviews for a project that consisted of the addition of a southbound left turn lane on a two- lane rural roadway. The project included milling and resurfacing of existing pavement, drainage improvements, widening for the turn lane, adding paved shoulders, adding sidewalks, permitting, utility coordination and surveying and mapping. Project Engineer, Hurricane DYWIDAG Sign Structure Replacement, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise. Served as a Project Engineer for design of 10 overhead sign structures. The design included sign structures, foundations, connections, panels, striping, maintenance of traffic, utility coordination, geotechnical, and surveying and mapping. Project Engineer, Lithia Pinecrest Road and Lumsden Road Intersection Improvements, Hillsborough County, FL. Intersection improvements that involved addition of through lanes in three of the four legs of the intersection, addition of turn lanes, drainage improvements, sidewalks throughout the project limits, and bicycle lanes. R-27 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Chad Polk, PE Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Project Manager, Rockridge Road Bridge Replacement Study/Design/Construction Design, Polk County, FL. Study and design of a flat-slab concrete bridge to replace an existing single-lane timber bridge. The bridge was constructed within close proximity to an intersection which provided for a challenging traffic control plan. Project Manager, Horseshoe Creek Bridge Replacement Final Design, Polk County, FL. Design of a flat-slab concrete bridge to replace the existing single-lane timber bridge. Challenges of the project included right-of-way acquisition, wetland permitting, and a phased traffic control plan. Project Engineer/Project Manager, Adell Road Bridge Replacement Construction Design, Polk County, FL. Design of the roadway approaches for a three-sided box culvert to replace an existing single-lane bridge. He subsequently served as the Project Manager for the construction design phase of the project. Project Engineer, I-71/I-670 Design Build, Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), OH. Led a task that produced the final deliverable, a set of Record Drawings to ODOT, for this $200 million construction project. The task included the incorporation of 432 Requests for Information into more than 100 separate design packages that were submitted to ODOT. These design packages ultimately combined to yield one final set of Record Drawings for ODOT. Project Engineer, Route 367, MoDOT, MO. Conversion of 3 miles of a four-lane divided highway with two-lane, two-way outer roads and four at-grade intersections to a four-lane undivided section with two-lane, one-way outer roads and four interchanges that utilized slip ramps and “Texas Turnarounds” to provide access between the mainline and outer roads. His responsibilities included stormwater design, roadway design, and cost estimating. R-28 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Colleen Ross, PE Education BS, Environmental Engineering, University of Central Florida MS, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Central Florida Registrations/Certifications Professional Engineer (License # 54081), Florida Years of Experience 13 Experience Summary Colleen has experience on various major transportation projects requiring NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) and PD&E (Project Development and Engineering) study and compliance. Projects include corridor planning, PD&E/NEPA studies, rail/transit, and transportation planning studies. Her primary tasks include report documentation with expertise in data collection of existing and future conditions, analyses of data, and PD&E/NEPA documentation. Colleen is responsible for coordinating with all disciplines during transportation studies to ensure all potential impacts are documented and accurate. Relevant Project Experience Task Lead, Colonial Parkway PD&E Study, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise (FTE), Orlando, FL. Responsible for evaluating social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various alternatives for improvements, completion of the State Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), coordination of the supporting environmental documents (i.e. Natural Resources Evaluation (NRE) Report, Sociocultural Effects Evaluation (SCE) Report, etc.). Acted as the Safety Coordinator for the project and assisted in the development of the project Health and Safety Plan. PD&E Study to evaluate alternative improvements for the widening of a seven (7) mile segment of SR 50/East Colonial Drive between Woodbury Road and SR 520 along with the inclusion of limited access general toll lanes within the corridor. Project includes a major east- west arterial serving central Florida, heavily impacted by population growth and tourism. Solutions include widening existing SR 50 up to six- lanes for local trips and adding four tolled lanes within the SR 50 R/W to accommodate through trips and aid in emergency evacuation. Challenges include impacts to multiple businesses including potential relocations, aggressive schedule, and a highly constrained corridor. Project Coordinator, Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Update, Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Collier County, FL. Responsible for coordinating the development of LRTP document, assist with the development of supporting documents for the LRTP, coordinating with subconsultants on schedule and needs, and coordinating subconsultant contracts. Develop a 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) pursuant to federal guidelines by December 2020. The purpose of this plan update is to advance a 20- year planning horizon and to adopt a Cost Feasible Plan that encourages and promotes a safe and efficient, multi-modal transportation system that addresses the future year transportation demands. Results of the LRTP process are intended to serve the overall mobility needs of the area while also being cost effective and consistent with national, state and local goals and objectives. Challenges include reconciling two different socio-economic data: University of Florida’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) as required by FDOT District One and the County Interactive Growth Model (CGIM) as a separate analysis for Collier MPO, and incorporating two new target performance measures for all LRTP Updates: Automated Connected Electric Vehicle Shared (ACES) and Resiliency. Environmental Lead, Immokalee Rd (CR 846) at Randall Blvd Intersection PD&E Study, FDOT District One, Collier County, FL. Environmental Lead responsible for evaluating social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various alternatives for improvements, completion of the Type 2 Categorical Exclusion in the FDOT SWEPT Tool, coordination of the supporting environmental documents (i.e. Natural Resources Evaluation (NRE) Report, Noise Study Report, Level 1 Contamination Screening Evaluation Report (CSER), etc.), and assisted in the documentation of the Locations Hydraulic Report and the Pond Siting Report. Acted as the Safety Coordinator for the project and assisted in the development of the project Health and Safety Plan. Assisted with public involvement activities throughout the project including the meeting summary reports. PD&E Study to evaluate alternative improvements for the widening of the intersection at Immokalee Blvd and Randall Blvd as well as the widening of Randall Blvd from 2 lanes to 4 lanes. Project includes a major east- west arterial with a connection to I-75 in unincorporated Collier County. Solutions included an interim at-grade widening as well as an ultimate grade- separated (flyover) at the intersection. Challenges included panther habitat in the study area and two project holds by FDOT which required scope clarifications due to changes in the PD&E Manual during the project delays. R-29 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Colleen Ross, PE Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Environmental Lead, Downtown Lakeland Pedestrian Crossings PD&E Study, FDOT District One, Lakeland (Polk County), FL. Environmental Lead responsible for evaluating social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various alternatives for improvements, completion of Non-Major State Action document, and coordination of the supporting environmental documents. Assisted with public involvement activities throughout the project including the meeting summary reports. PD&E study to evaluate bicycle and pedestrian crossings at the intersections of the CSX Railroad with Kentucky Avenue and New York Avenue (approximately four blocks apart). Solutions included grade-separated concepts (bridges over CSX right-of-way) to enhance bicycle and pedestrian connectivity, access and mobility. Challenges included coordinating with CSX Transportation for a permit to enter the CSX Railroad Right of Way for survey needs, coordination with City of Lakeland for access to City property for geotechnical investigation, and coordination with the City of Lakeland on vision and concepts for the crossings. Environmental Lead, Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road Corridor Study, Collier County, Collier County, FL. Environmental Lead responsible for evaluating social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various alternatives for improvements, completion of a Corridor Study Report, and coordination of the supporting documents. Assisted with public involvement activities throughout the project and coordinated with multiple subconsultants. Study to evaluate potential roadway network improvements near Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road in northern Collier County. Specifically, the study evaluated potential improvements to existing roadway facilities as well as potential corridors on a new alignment. This study included the development of alternatives, a comparative evaluation of the social and environmental effects and the overall cost of each option. Challenges included panther habitat in the study area and documentation of rapidly changing approved development in the area. Environmental Coordinator, I-4/Poinciana Parkway Connector PD&E Study, FDOT District 5, Osceola and Polk Counties, FL. Assisted the Environmental Lead in evaluating social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various alternatives. This project involves the preparation of the alternate corridor evaluation report (ACER), public involvement and agency coordination, environmental documentation and various management duties in anticipation of an Environmental Impact Statement. The study is evaluating an enhanced connection from the northern terminus of the Poinciana Parkway at US 17/92 and C.R. 54 to Interstate 4 or the Central Polk Parkway, approximately 4- to 6-miles in length. The USFWS ETDM Coordinator stated that they were putting the project in dispute, which required additional coordination. Environmental Lead, Osceola Parkway Extension Concept, Feasibility, and Mobility Study, Central Florida Expressway Authority, Osceola County, FL. Environmental Lead responsible for evaluating social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various mobility options, completion of a Concept, Feasibility and Mobility Study Report, and coordination of the supporting documents and disciplines. Assisted with public involvement activities throughout the project and coordinated with multiple subconsultants. Study to evaluate extending Osceola Parkway eastward to the Northeast Connector Expressway to provide additional east- west capacity between SR 417 and US 192 along the Orange/Osceola County line to relieve congestion on both roadways and on the surrounding local roadway network. Specifically, the study evaluated current and future transportation demands, developed and evaluated a range of mobility options, and analyzed feasible alignments that could then be carried forward to a PD&E study. Challenges included avoidance of minimization of FWC-managed land and intense public opposition of the project. Environmental Task Coordinator, Florida’s Turnpike (HEFT/SR 821) Interchange at NW 170th Street PD&E Study, Private Client, Miami- Dade County, FL. Assisted in evaluating social, cultural, natural, and physical impacts for various alternatives for improvements, completion of a State Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) document, and coordination of the supporting environmental documents. Assisted with public involvement activities throughout the project including the meeting summary reports. Acted as the Safety Coordinator for the project and assisted in the development of the project Health and Safety Plan. PD&E study to evaluate alternatives including the No Build and a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) concept for a new interchange at NW 170th Street on Florida’s Turnpike (HEFT/SR 821). Solutions included a new DDI on HEFT/SR 821, a new six-lane NW 170th Street with bike lanes and sidewalks, a new roadway drainage system, and relocation of the Golden Glades Canal. Challenges included determining the project effects while the design and PD&E study re-evaluation of the HEFT/ SR 821 widening at this location was ongoing concurrently. R-30 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Tom Ross, PE Education BS, Civil Engineering, University of Central Florida Registrations/Certifications Professional Engineer: Florida, 48205 Years of Experience 28 Experience Summary With 28 years of experience in transportation planning, traffic operations, and design for roadway projects throughout Florida, Tom has extensive experience in providing quality review for roadway signing and pavement marking, signals, ITS, and lighting projects. Expertise in designing clear and concise signage plans and creative solutions that improve circulation and minimize conflict. Relevant Project Experience Traffic/Signing and Pavement Marking/ ITS/ Lighting QA/QC, HEFT Ramp Intersection at NW 12th Street Modifications, FTE, Miami-Dade County, FL. Provided QA/QC for the traffic analysis, signing and pavement marking, signalization, ITS, and lighting elements for this project that included the design of an additional right-turn lane on the southbound off-ramp at the HEFT/12th Street Interchange, upgrade of the existing signalized intersection at NW 12th Street including ADA compliance for pedestrian features, and lighting analysis to accommodate proposed changes. Traffic Engineer, PD&E Widen SR 528 from SR 520 to Industry Road, FTE, Orange and Brevard Counties, FL. Traffic engineer for this study to evaluate the proposed Beachline widening to eight lanes from SR 520 to SR 524 (Industry Road). The PD&E Study includes overlapping design (milling, resurfacing. and sign structure replacement) for critical roadway segments, feasibility evaluation of a potential service plaza, multimodal accommodations for rail/transit facilities, ITS master planning, and extensive environmental resources within the study area. Subsequent task includes post-design for milling and resurfacing. ITS Plans QC/Engineer of Record, Turnpike Widening from Osceola Parkway to SR 528, Osceola and Orange County, FL. ITS Plans QC for replacement of SR 91 over CSX RR and Central Florida Parkway. Engineer of record for Wetherbee Pier Protection and quality control for Orange Avenue Bridges over SR 91 and Taft-Vineland Bridges over SR 91. Structural efforts included concept selections, final designs and services during construction. Traffic Engineering Lead, CFX, I-4/SR 408 Program Management, Orlando, FL. A $2.3B I-4 Ultimate Public Private Partnership (P3) project including SR 408 Interchange. The project is constructing an interchange between I-4 and SR 408 to provide direct access between the two roadways in downtown Orlando. This effort includes design engineering review, technical specifications review, change order review, project cost estimate development, ITS devices shop drawings review to ensure compliance with approved project design criteria, Contractor Requests for Information (RFI) review and overall project coordination on behalf of CFX. Traffic Engineering Lead, CFX and FDOT District 5, Wekiva Parkway Corridor Consultant Services, Orange Lake, and Seminole Counties, FL. Project involves program management, project management oversight of client-selected design consultants, design reviews, environmental permitting and compliance, R/W coordination assistance, and services during construction on this contract for both CFX and FDOT for the design of a new 25-mile section of the Wekiva Parkway. Services on this contract include successfully managing six design teams in the delivery of five roadway and three toll facility projects with a constructed value of $550M, as well as providing comprehensive reviews of all necessary design submittals for CFX. We are also providing contractual support services for negotiations/ contract administration, ensuring all contracts were audit compliant for CFX. We are supporting CFX with the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act loan application process through the FHWA, including efforts necessary to achieve final loan approval. We are also providing coordination with the public involvement consultant and the CFX public involvement officer. Further, our staff is providing technical reviews and environmental compliance for the design of FDOT’s nine design sections required as part of the Wekiva Parkway corridor. Traffic/Signing and Pavement Marking/ ITS/ Lighting QA/QC, FTE, I-75 (SR 93) at Florida’s Turnpike, Wildwood Interchange Design-Build Request for Proposal, Phase I, Sumter County, FL. Provided QA/QC for the traffic analysis, signing and pavement marking, ITS, and lighting elements of this project to improve the operational efficiency and safety of the existing interchange through a design- build delivery. Key project issues include: reconfigure the interchange to provide a dedicated right-hand exit to SB Turnpike from SR 44, separate NB I-75 exit traffic to SR 44 from NB Turnpike mainline traffic, widen I-75 from existing four-lane to six lanes, removal and replacement of existing ITS system, master signing concept on I-75 and Turnpike mainline, maintenance of traffic to implement construction including significant detour design. R-31 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Tom Ross, PE Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Corridor Transportation Planner/Traffic Engineer, CFX, Wekiva Parkway/SR 46 Realignment PD&E Study, Orange Lake, and Seminole Counties, FL. Project involves a corridor analysis of a 26-mile limited-access toll facility (four lanes, expandable to six lanes) on new alignment that will complete the Western Beltway around the metropolitan Orlando area. Responsibilities include corridor-wide concept design input based on traffic operations and coordinating production of an Interchange Modification Report (IMR) for modified I-4/Wekiva Parkway system-system interchange. Traffic/Signing and Pavement Marking/ ITS/ Lighting QA/QC, FTE, Seminole Expressway/ SR 417 Widening (Orange/Seminole County Line to North of SR 434), Seminole County, FL. Responsible for quality review of signing and pavement marking plans for this multidisciplinary, multiple-subconsultant project to widen existing four- lane SR 417 to six lanes. Key project issues include reconstruction of the bridges over Aloma Avenue, complex design/MOT to minimize horizontal stopping sight distance deficiencies on the mainline (including cross overs), fast-track FDEP permitting, with considerations for new criteria guidelines and coordination with local agencies, to ensure mutual benefit for design implementation. Project was performed under fast-track schedule to acquire necessary permits before proposed rule change. Project Manager and Signing and Pavement Marking Lead, International Parkway/SR 417 Interchange PD&E Study and Final Design, FDOT District 5, Seminole County, FL. As a subconsultant, led Jacobs’ efforts for the PD&E Study and final design to add ramps from the existing SR 417/I-4 interchange to International Parkway Boulevard in Seminole County. We provided public involvement, natural environment evaluations, and traffic review for the PD&E. In addition to reviewing the traffic report, Tom used the Turnpike forecast data to demonstrate to FHWA the ramp operations and the effect on I-4. Upon federal approval, we were awarded a design option. For the final design, Tom completed design and plans production for signal design, developed complex advance signing plan, pavement markings, and lighting design. R-32 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Ernest Sackey, PE Education MS, Civil Engineering (Transportation), University of Central Florida BS, Geodetic Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Registrations/Certifications Professional Engineer: Florida (#71730), Virginia (#0402050351), Texas (#103742), Maryland (#51551), Georgia (#044447) Years of Experience 15 Experience Summary Ernest Sackey is an experienced ITS and traffic engineer with specialized expertise in technical design, maintenance, and operations of ITS and tolling systems, traffic operations center, traffic signal systems, connected and autonomous vehicle systems, and smart systems. He has extensive experience on projects in several states including Florida, Virginia, Georgia, and Maryland. Relevant Project Experience Senior ITS Engineer, SunTrax Infield Test Facility, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise (FTE), Polk County, FL. Project involves designing and preparing a complete set of construction contract documents and incidental engineering services, as necessary, for the SunTrax Infield Test Facility, which is intended to be used for testing of autonomous and connected vehicles and other emerging transportation technologies. The project included design of fiber optic cable infrastructure, CCTV camera assemblies, and development of a communications plan to for the project corridor to include next generation technologies such as 5G cellular. ITS Design Engineer, Florida Turnpike HEFT (SR 821) Widening and Express Lanes from SR 836 to NW 106th Street, FTE, Miami, FL. ITS (ITS) design engineer for the construction of express lanes on Florida’s Turnpike. This project widened the Turnpike HEFT between SR 836 to NW 106th Street from six to ten lanes with the additional four lanes (two in each direction) being operated as express lanes. The project included the design for installation of fiber optic cable communication, CCTV cameras, dynamic message signs, toll rate dynamic message signs, vehicle detection system, and a travel time system. Senior ITS Engineer, Beachline Expressway ITS Master Plan, FTE, Orlando, FL. Project to develop an ITS Master Plan for Beachline Expressway (SR 528) from west of SR 520 to east of Industry Road. This master plan will evaluate the current systems, determine future needs, and formulate an implementation strategy for the future development and maintenance of the ITS. The master plan will include all essential technology information and recommendations and a system-wide implementation methodology. Senior ITS Engineer, I-295 Signs Update and Active Traffic Management System, FDOT District 6, Jacksonville, FL. ITS Design Engineer for the construction of Active Traffic Management (ATM) System along the Buckman Bridge on I-295 in Jacksonville. The project deployed ATM applications of Vehicle Detection System, Speed Harmonization and Queue Warning System to the Buckman Bridge to provide the ability for operators to "actively" monitor and manage traffic operations in real- time using field hardware and central software. The project included the design for installation of fiber optic cable communication, CCTV cameras, Dynamic Message Signs, Lane Control Signs and a Vehicle Detection System. Senior ITS Engineer, FTE Widening and Express Lanes from Osceola Parkway to Beachline, FTE, Orlando, FL. ITS Design Engineer for the construction of Express Lanes on Florida’s Turnpike. This project will widen the Turnpike Mainline between Osceola Parkway and Beachline Expressway from four to eight lanes with the additional four lanes (two in each direction) being operated as Express Lanes. The project included the design for installation of fiber optic cable communication, CCTV cameras, Dynamic Message Signs, Toll Rate Dynamic Message Signs, Vehicle Detection System and a Travel Time System. Senior ITS Engineer, I-270 Innovative Congestion Management, Maryland, Maryland State Highway Administration. ITS Design Engineer for the construction of Adaptive Ramp Metering and a suite of Active Traffic Management (ATM) technology- based strategies to mitigate congestion and improve safety including Dynamic Speed Limits, Queue Warning and Traffic Monitoring. The project will include the design for installation of fiber optic cable communication, CCTV cameras, Dynamic Message Signs, Dynamic Speed Limit Signs and a Vehicle Detection System. R-33 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Ernest Sackey, PE Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Senior ITS Engineer 16 & I-95 Interchange Reconstruction, Georgia DOT, Savannah, GA. ITS Design Engineer for the construction of an Intelligent Transportation System with the reconstruction of the I-16 & I-95 interchange. The project will include the design for installation of fiber optic cable communication, CCTV cameras, Dynamic Message Signs, Vehicle Detection System and a communication system master hub. Senior ITS Engineer I-4 Beyond the Ultimate (BTU) Section 2, FDOT District 5, Orlando, FL. Project to prepare a set of plans and all supporting construction documents for the reconstruction and widening design of I-4 as part of the I-4 Beyond the Ultimate concept which involves the build-out of I-4 to its ultimate condition within the project limits. The project limits are within a 3.85-mile segment of I-4 which extends from west of Central Florida Parkway (MP 4.618) to west of Kirkman Road (MP 9.249) in Orange County. The proposed improvements include widening the existing six lane divided urban interstate to a ten-lane divided with two (2) new express lanes in each direction. The project will include the design for installation of fiber optic cable communication, CCTV cameras, Dynamic Message Signs, Toll Rate Dynamic Message Signs, Vehicle Detection System and a Travel Time System. Senior ITS Engineer I-4/SR 408 Program Management, Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX), Orlando, FL. Serving as ITS technical lead and CFX Owner’s Representative for the $2.3 billion I-4 Ultimate Public Private Partnership (P3) project and SR 408 Interchange. The project is constructing an interchange between I-4 and SR 408 to provide direct access between the two roadways in downtown Orlando. This effort includes design engineering review, technical specifications review, change order review, project cost estimate development, ITS devices shop drawings review to ensure compliance with approved project design criteria, Contractor Requests for Information (RFI) review and overall project coordination on behalf of CFX. Senior ITS Engineer, Florida Turnpike Widening and Express Lanes from Atlantic Avenue to Boynton Beach Blvd., FTE, Palm Beach County, FL. Senior ITS Engineer | ITS (ITS) Design Engineer for the construction of Express Lanes on Florida’s Turnpike. This project will widen the Turnpike Mainline between Atlantic Avenue and Boynton Beach Blvd to ten lanes with the additional four lanes (two in each direction) being operated as Express Lanes. The project will include the design for installation of fiber optic cable communication, CCTV cameras, Dynamic Message Signs, Toll Rate Dynamic Message Signs, Vehicle Detection System and a Travel Time System. ITS Technical Lead, Wekiva Parkway Corridor Management, Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX), Orlando, FL. Served as ITS technical lead as the CFX Owner’s Representative for Wekiva Parkway project. The Wekiva Parkway (SR 429) would connect to SR 417, completing the beltway around Central Florida, while helping to protect the natural resources surrounding the Wekiva River. This effort includes design engineering review, technical specifications review, change order review, project cost estimate development, ITS devices shop drawings review to ensure compliance with approved project design criteria, Contractor Requests for Information review and overall project coordination on behalf of CFX. ITS Technical Lead, I-66 Express Lanes, Virginia DOT, Fairfax, VA. Tolling and ITS design engineering and construction oversight support as part of the Virginia Megaprojects program I-66 Express Lanes (Outside the Beltway) project that is expanding the current HOV facility from one to two lanes in each direction for approximately 22 miles, from I-495 to University Boulevard in Gainesville, to create two Express Lanes. This effort will include design engineering review, technical specifications review, change order review, project cost estimate development, ITS devices shop drawings review and ITS construction inspection to ensure compliance with approved project design criteria and development of joint operations and maintenance protocols. R-34 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Megan Shimko Education B.A., Psychology/Marketing, Summa Cum Laude, Miami University, 2011 John E. Dolibois European Center, International Program, 2009 Years of Experience 9 Experience Summary Megan is a public involvement, marketing, and sales professional with over eight years of experience. She has demonstrated success in strategic and marketing communications, business development, public and media relations, editorial/publications management, and technical writing/editing. Recently, Megan has served as Community Engagement Lead, responsible for developing and leading strategic growth initiatives in the Midwest region. Relevant Project Experience Publications Lead and Public Involvement Coordinator, Kane County Division of Transportation, Kane County 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan, Kane County, IL. In 2015, Jacobs was selected to update the County’s 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan. Work efforts include updating the travel demand model, identifying deficiencies in the existing transportation network, program-level cost estimating, and an extensive community outreach program. She is serving as Publications Lead and is assisting with public involvement coordination. Challenges include reconciling two different socio-economic data: University of Florida’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) as required by FDOT District One and the County Interactive Growth Model (CGIM) as a separate analysis for Collier MPO, and incorporating two new target performance measures for all LRTP Updates: Automated Connected Electric Vehicle Shared (ACES) and Resiliency. Community Engagement Lead, Multiple Locations. Responsible for developing and leading strategic growth initiatives in the Midwest region. Part of a team that oversees Jacobs’ involvement in industry and community activities to ensure Jacobs is strategizing commitments and prioritizing investments to align with Jacobs’ core mission and values. By using Jacobs’ core missions and values as the basis for investment choices, she helps ensure that Jacobs’ brand identity is in alignment with short- and long-term sales goals. In addition, she is responsible for coordination of activities related to professional conferences and events throughout the year, selecting and coordinating the development of display graphics and collateral materials, arranging sponsorships, securing booth space and amenities, scheduling staff for attendance or attending herself, and ensuring follow-up with contacts from the event. Public Involvement Coordinator, Elgin O’Hare Western Access (EOWA) Project, Illinois Tollway, Chicago, IL. Currently assisting with public outreach activities, community events, and collateral material production for the $3.4B Elgin O’Hare Western Access Project. The EOWA project includes the construction of 17 miles of new road, including a toll road from Lake Street to O'Hare, and a toll road along the west side of O'Hare airport connecting I-294 and I-90. Publications Lead and Public Involvement Coordinator, Tri-County Access Project (IL 53/120), Illinois Tollway, Chicago, IL. The objective of this project was to determine the best comprehensive transportation solution for the IL 53 corridor in the regional area adjacent to and including Lake County, Illinois. The project examined a wide range of alternatives designed to reduce congestion and improve mobility in Lake County. The large nature of the project required extensive public involvement efforts to resolve contentious issues and build consensus on the process. She coordinated public involvement activities, including stakeholder meetings, collateral, social media, project website and public messaging. In addition, she served as Publications Lead on this controversial project. In this role, she managed the direction of project-related publications, including presentations and documents. Public Involvement Coordinator, US 30 Planning and Environmental Linkages Study, Iowa Department of Transportation, Cedar and Clinton Counties, IA. Assisted with public involvement and agency coordination for this project that administered a robust public involvement program while performing and delivering early planning level transportation studies for the US 30 corridor in eastern Iowa. The study corridor focused on the approximately 41-mile stretch of US 30 from just east of the Mount Vernon/Lisbon Bypass to just west of the interchange with US 61 at DeWitt, which is an existing two-lane rural highway that connects to four lane freeway sections on each end. The study culminated in a US 30 Vision Document that serves as the roadmap for future project development in the corridor. There was a series of public meetings (traditional and online) throughout the course of the year-long study. R-35 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Megan Shimko Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Public Involvement Coordinator Kane County Impact Fee Program Update, Kane County Division of Transportation, Kane County, IL. In 2015, Jacobs was selected to update the impact fee program in Kane County, as required every five years under state law. The project involved travel demand modeling, identifying projects on a county- wide basis to address capacity deficiencies, estimating costs at a program level, and updating the program fee structure. The program was adopted by the County Board in 2017, and Jacobs continues on the contract to provide Individual Assessments under the program. Megan assisted with public involvement and project coordination. Marketing Communications Lead, Illinois Safety Program: Various Safety Services, Illinois DOT, Springfield, IL. Served as the Marketing and Communication Lead for the Illinois Safety Program. Coordinated marketing initiatives and assisted with technical writing and presentation development for this $7M contract. Helped coordinate IDOT’s Bureau of Safety Engineering’s participation in the Illinois State Fair. Developed and created community involvement activities, as well as, collateral and interactive marketing materials. Inside Sales Coordinator, Multiple Clients, Chicago, IL. Responsible for the coordination of marketing, communication and client relationship management efforts in the Chicagoland region. She manages the process of responding to Letter of Interests (LOI), Request for Qualifications (RFQs) and Request for Proposals (RFPs) from a wide variety of current and potential clients. She prepares detailed, precise, and compelling Statement of Qualifications (SOQs) based on the specific requirements of the RFQ/Ps, paying meticulous attention to detail. She writes and edits firm profiles, resumes, project descriptions, and project-specific narratives, as well as maintains company information and marketing collateral. R-36 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Susanne Torriente Education Master of Public Administration, University of Miami BA, English, University of Miami Years of Experience 28 Experience Summary Susanne Torriente is an accomplished organizational strategist with more than 28 years of local government experience in South Florida. She recently joined Jacobs after serving the City of Miami Beach for 5 years as Assistant City Manager (ACM) and as the City’s first Chief Resilience Officer (CRO). Susanne’s portfolio includes planning, building, code compliance, sustainability and environment management. She has been a presenter at hundreds of climate, sustainability and resilience conferences around the world over the last 10 years. In 2019, Susanne was invited to participate in a US Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Community Resilience Center of Excellence (CoE) Evaluation Panel. She was recognized by the South Florida Hispanic Chamber of Commerce with a Hispanic Leadership Award in Sustainability. Relevant Project Experience CRO, City of Miami Beach, FL. As CRO, she is building on that foundation to develop an action- oriented updated strategic plan, through the lens of resilience, and a broader Greater Miami & the Beaches 100 Resilient Cities Strategy supported by the 100 Resilient Cities Network, pioneered by the Rockefeller Foundation. Her strength is breaking down complex issues into manageable solutions, fostering collaboration and directing organizational strategic planning. Over the last year she has secured and managed several important grants and projects including the Urban Land Institute (ULI) Review of the Miami Beach’s Stormwater Program, Bloomberg Philanthropies Mayor’s Challenges and Columbia University’s Resilience Accelerator for the West Avenue Neighborhood Improvement Project. Sustainability Director, Miami-Dade County, FL. Spearheaded the planning effort to develop the County’s first sustainability and climate action plan, GreenPrint. Susanne is a founding member of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Compact staff steering committee. She chaired the Transportation Work Group of the Compact, as well as the Emergency Management and Risk Reduction Work Group for the regional climate action plans. Public Safety Assistant County Manager, Miami- Dade County, FL. Held a central role during the County's response to the numerous damaging hurricanes of 2004 and 2005. Due to that experience, she was appointed to FEMA’s National Advisory Council. Various Progressive Roles – Chief of Staff, Chief Assistant County Manager, Human Resources Deputy Director, Procurement Assistant Director and Budget Analyst, Miami-Dade County, FL. While working for Miami-Dade County, steadily proceeded through the various management levels into roles with increased responsibility that required progressively broader institutional knowledge of the County’s resources and functions. Assistant City Manager, Fort Lauderdale, FL. During her four years in Fort Lauderdale as Assistant City Manager for Operations, she focused on streamlining city services (from 16 departments to nine), initiating strategic management practices & performance measurement systems and integrating sustainability into city operations. She was responsible for overseeing Sustainable Development, Transportation & Mobility, Public Works, Parks & Recreation and Structural Innovation. While in Fort Lauderdale she served as Co-Chair of the Infrastructure & Growth Leadership Pillar for Broward’s Six Pillars Planning process and was the lead staff to the city’s visioning process producing Fast Forward Fort Lauderdale: Our City, Our Vision, 2035. She led the team that trained and secured ISO 14001 environmental management certification for the city’s fleet yard. R-37 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Ken Wooten, PE Education MBA, Business Administration, University of Florida BS, Environmental Engineering, University of Florida Registrations/Certifications Professional Engineer: Florida (#58817) Years of Experience 19+ Experience Summary Ken Wooten has more than 19 years of roadway design and project management experience on multi-disciplined design projects and PD&E studies. He specializes in roadway design and planning for highway facilities such as interstate highways, interchanges, freeways, intersections, and urban and rural arterial roads. Ken has extensive experience on projects for FDOT throughout Florida. Relevant Project Experience Roadway Design Engineer, Oil Well Road, Collier County Transportation Department, Collier County, FL. Roadway engineer responsible for design of 11.1 miles of Oil Well Road from Immokalee Road to east of Camp Keais Road in eastern Collier County. The project scope included widening a two-lane rural section to a four-lane and six-lane urban section. Responsibilities included horizontal and vertical alignment, leading the preparation of the design plan, and assisting the project manager with coordinating the design plans preparation with internal staff and subconsultants. Project Manager, Cass Street and Tyler Street Two-Way Conversion, City of Tampa, Hillsborough County, FL. Conversion of the existing one-way pair streets of East Cass Street (existing three lanes in the eastbound direction) and East Tyler Street (existing three lanes in the westbound direction) into two-way streets. The improvements consist of milling and resurfacing within the project limits, adding a barrier separated two-way cycle track on the south side of the roadway, pavement markings, signing, and replacing the traffic signals. There are a total of thirteen (13) signalized intersections that need to be modified to accommodate the proposed roadway modifications, which will require replacing and adding new mast arms to be in compliance with new design standards. Project Manager, US 41/SR 45/Broad Street Improvements, FDOT District Seven, Hernando County, FL. Milling and resurfacing of the asphalt pavement and correcting cross slope to meet current design criteria for 4.76 miles of roadway. Project also includes correcting superelevation rate and superelevation transitions, developing two separate pavement designs to account for varying cracking/ rutting depths, replacing existing cracked concrete ditch pavement, designing signing and pavement marking upgrades to improve the safety at the intersection of US 41 and CR 481/Snow Memorial Highway, and processing design variations for deficient design features. Project Manager, Gunn Highway/Linebaugh Avenue Intersection Improvements Study, Miscellaneous Professional Engineering Services General/Civil, Hillsborough County, FL. Managed the PD&E Study to identify the optimum intersection improvement recommendation for the intersection at Gunn Highway and Linebaugh Avenue. As part of the study, preliminary roadway alignments and typical sections are under development. In addition, the scope of services included a traffic study, drainage and permitting analysis, signalization, development of a preliminary maintenance of traffic concept, and cost estimates for the design and construction of the recommended improvements. Project Engineer, Winchester Boulevard Design, Sarasota County, FL. Responsible for designing six stormwater management systems for a new 3-mile roadway alignment. Responsibilities included ditch design, storm sewer design, pond design, cross drain design, floodplain encroachment, and compensation analysis and permitting. Drainage Engineer, Winchester Boulevard PD&E Study, Sarasota County, FL. Responsible for floodplain compensation analysis, cross drain analysis, and preparation of location hydraulics report for this PD&E study. Purpose of study was to determine a preferred alignment and design features for a new 3-mile roadway in southern Sarasota County. Key elements of the project included public involvement, traffic analysis, roadway and drainage design, permitting, and environmental issues. Project Engineer, I-4 Auxiliary Lanes (SR 528 to SR 482) Design/Build, FDOT District Five, Brevard County, FL. Drainage engineer responsible for the ditch design, pond design, and permitting for the addition of an eastbound and westbound auxiliary lane on a 1.3-mile section of I-4. The project is located in a high traffic volume area near Orlando's major tourist attractions. R-38 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Ken Wooten, PE Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning / General Planning Services C Project Manager, Homestead Toll Plaza Express Lanes Design, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Miami-Dade County, FL. Project manager and engineer of record for the reconstruction the existing toll plaza, construction of a new administration building and parking lot, and roadway improvements to the toll facility. Two additional mainline travel lanes (one in each direction) are required within the vicinity of the toll plaza to accommodate adequate traffic operations and are proposed to be added to the inside of the existing travel lanes. The scope of services for the 2.1-mile project includes drainage design, utility coordination, permitting, structures design, toll facility design, signing and pavement markings, lighting, landscape architecture, surveying and mapping, geotechnical, and architecture. Roadway/MOT, Wekiva Parkway Corridor Consultant, Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX) and FDOT District Five, Orange Lake, and Seminole Counties, FL. Responsible for technical reviews of roadway and MOT plans on this contract for both the Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX) and FDOT for the design of a new 26-mile section. The team’s services on this contract include successfully managing six design teams in the delivery of five roadway and three toll facility projects with a constructed value of $550M, as well as providing comprehensive reviews of all necessary design submittals for CFX. Project Engineer, I-95 Design, FDOT District 5, Brevard County, FL. Project engineer for the final design of a 13.5-mile segment of I-95 from south of SR 514 (Malabar Road) to north of SR 518 (Eau Gallie Boulevard). The project includes providing safety improvements such as median guardrail to address median crossover accidents, as well as adding widening to the inside for an additional lane in each direction for capacity and safety. Included in the final design services is the design and reconstruction of two interchanges (US 192 and SR 518), and design elements for drainage and stormwater design and permitting, right-of-way acquisition for retention ponds, noise walls, bridge widening and reconstruction, and maintenance of traffic. Responsible for horizontal and vertical alignment, led the preparation of the design plans and assisted the project manager. Project Engineer, Seminole Expressway/SR 417 PD&E Study, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Seminole County, FL. Served as project engineer for this eight-lane PD&E study. Responsibilities included development of widening concepts and development of alternatives for improvements to the Aloma Avenue interchange. Project issues included Lake Jesup water quality, public involvement with the Friends of Lake Jesup, previous permit coordination, and interchange improvements at Aloma Avenue. A design option for this project was exercised by the client based on successful performance. Project Engineer, General Engineering Consultant Services, FDOT District Seven, FL. Provided services to support the District’s Plans, Specifications, and Estimates Group. Responsibilities included reviewing roadway plans, specification packages, and cost estimates. In addition, provided roadway design plan phase reviews on multiple projects, while supporting the District’s Roadway Design Group. Project Manager, Lithia Pinecrest Road and Lumsden Road Intersection Improvements Design, Miscellaneous Professional Engineering Services General/Civil Contract, Hillsborough County, FL. Design project to improve safety and traffic operations. Project involved adding additional through lanes in three of the four legs of the intersection, additional turn lanes in all four legs of the intersection, sidewalks throughout the project limits, and bike lanes along Lithia Pinecrest Road. Lithia Pinecrest Road is being reconstructed within the project limits from a two-lane rural typical section to a four-lane urban typical section and Lumdsen Road is being milled, resurfaced, and widened to accommodate the improvements. The project scope of services also included drainage improvements, permitting, signalization, signing and pavement markings, utility coordination, surveying and mapping, and geotechnical. R-39 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Required Forms/Certifications9.E.6 Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Vendor Check List IMPORTANT: Please review carefully and submit with your Proposal/Bid. All applicable documents shall be submitted electronically through BidSync. Vendor should checkoff each of the following items: General Bid Instructions has been acknowledged and accepted. Collier County Purchase Order Terms and Conditions have been acknowledged and accepted. Form 1: Vendor Declaration Statement Form 2: Conflict of Interest Certification Proof of status from Division of Corporations - Florida Department of State (If work performed in the State) - http://dos.myflorida.com/sunbiz/ should be attached with your submittal. Vendor MUST be enrolled in the E-Verify - https://www.e-verify.gov/ at the time of submission of the proposal/bid. Form 3: Immigration Affidavit Certification MUST be signed and attached with your submittal or you MAY be DEEMED NON-RESPONSIVE E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding or Company Profile page should be attached with your submittal. Form 4: Certification for Claiming Status as a Local Business, if applicable, has been executed and returned. Collier or Lee County Business Tax Receipt should be attached with your submittal to be considered. Form 5: Reference Questionnaires form must be utilized for each requested reference and included with your submittal, id applicable to the solicitation. Form 6: Grant Provisions and Assurances package in its entirety, if applicable, are executed and should be included with your submittal. All forms must be executed, or you MAY be DEEMED NON-RESPONSIVE. Vendor W-9 Form. Vendor acknowledges Insurance Requirements and is prepared to produce the required insurance certificate(s) within five (5) days of the County’s issuance of a Notice of Recommend Award. The Bid Schedule has been completed and attached with your submittal, applicable to bids. Copies of all requested licenses and/or certifications to complete the requirements of the project. All addenda have been signed and attached, or you MAY be DEEMED NON-RESPONSIVE. County’s IT Technical Architecture Requirements has been acknowledged and accepted, if applicable. Any and all supplemental requirements and terms has been acknowledged and accepted, if applicable. X N/A 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Form 1: Vendor Declaration Statement BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners: The undersigned, as Vendor declares that this response is made without connection or arrangement with any other person and this proposal is in every respect fair and made in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The Vendor hereby declares the instructions, purchase order terms and conditions, requirements, and specifications/scope of work of this solicitation have been fully examined and accepted. The Vendor agrees, if this solicitation submittal is accepted by Collier County, to accept a Purchase Order as a form of a formal contract or to execute a Collier County formal contract for purposes of establishing a contractual relationship between the Vendor and Collier County, for the performance of all requirements to which this solicitation pertains. The Vendor states that the submitted is based upon the documents listed by the above referenced solicitation. The Vendor agrees to comply with the requirements in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications denoted herein and according to the pricing submitted as a part of the Vendor’s bids. Further, the Vendor agrees that if awarded a contract for these goods and/or services, the Vendor will not be eligible to compete, submit a proposal, be awarded, or perform as a sub-vendor for any future associated work that is a result of this awarded contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this _____ day of _____________, 20__ in the County of _______________, in the State of _____________. Firm’s Legal Name: Address: City, State, Zip Code: Florida Certificate of Authority Document Number Federal Tax Identification Number *CCR # or CAGE Code *Only if Grant Funded __________________________________________________________________________ Telephone: Email: Signature by: (Typed and written) Title: Solicitation 18-7432-MPCollier County 7/6/2020 10:08 AM p. 18 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Additional Contact Information Send payments to: (required if different from above) Company name used as payee Contact name: Title: Address: City, State, ZIP Telephone: Email: Office servicing Collier County to place orders (required if different from above) Contact name: Title: Address: City, State, ZIP Telephone: Email: Solicitation 18-7432-MPCollier County 7/6/2020 10:08 AM p. 19 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Collier County Co~er County Administrative Services Department Procu reme nt Services Division Solicitation 18-7432-MP Form 2: Cooflid of Interest Certification Affidavit The Vendor certifies that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, the past and current work on any Collier County project affiliated with this solicitation does not pose an organiz.ational conflict as described by one of the three categories below: Biased ground rules -The firm has not set the "ground rules" for affiliated past or current Collier County project identified above (e.g., writing a procurement's statement of work, specifications, or performing systems engineering and technical direction for the procurement) which appears to skew the competition in favor ofmy firm. Impaired objectivity -The firm has not perfurmed work on an affiliated past or current Collier County project identified above to evaluate proposals / past perfurmance of itself or a competitor, which calls into question the contractor's ability to render impartial advice to the government. Unequal access to information -The firm has not had access to nonpublic information as part of its performance of a Collier County project identified above which may have provided the contractor (or an affiliate) with an unfair competitive advantage in current or future solicitations and contracts. In addition to this signed affidavit. the contractor / vendor must provide the following: 1. All documents produced as a result of the work completed in the past or currently being worked on for the above-mentioned project; and, 2. Indicate if the information produced was obtained as a matter of public record (in the "sunshine") or through non-public (not in the "sunshine") conversation (s), meeting(s), document(s) and/or other means. Failure to disclose all material or having an organiz.atiooal conflict in one or more of the three categories above be identified, may result in the disqualification for future solicitations affiliated with the above referenced project(s). By the signature below, the firm (employees, officers and/or agents) certifies, and hereby discloses, that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, all relevant facts concerning past, present, or currently planned interest or activity (financial, contractual, organiz.atiooal, or otherwise) which relates to the project identified above has been fully disclosed and does not pose an organiz.atiooal conflict. State of 'F l0r\ cl 0- County of tv\. ( 0...(YI \ Jacobs EngineerinA Group Inc. Company Name ;//1/6~ I Signature William Beddow.Client Acount ManaAer Print Name and Title The for ~oing instrument w.is acknowledged before me by or D online notariz.ation, this ~ day of f\u9ust (month), qOirO (year), by_-Y-"--L\"'-".u<.::...u...~~~!,!.!...----'(nameofperson acknowledging). (Signature ofNotary Public -State of Florida) UlYlct M. EYQ-z.,o ~R Produced Identification (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name ofNotary Public) Type ofldentification Produced 71612020 10:08 AM CARLAMARIAERAZO l111,,\ IIY COIIIIS8ION IGG 255668 ,.;J EXPIRE8:0ctober15.2022 •••• .. , Bolldld Tlwu Nolaly Nila~ p.20 •••UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020••• 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of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acket Pg. 433 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Halsey Beshears, SecretaryRon DeSantis, GovernorSTATE OF FLORIDADEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATIONBOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERSTHE ENGINEERING BUSINESS HEREIN IS AUTHORIZED UNDER THEPROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTESJACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.Do not alter this document in any form.155 N. LAKE AVE.LICENSE NUMBER: CA2822EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2021This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document.PASADENA CA 91101Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com9.E.6Packet Pg. 434Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of Page 1 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number:Client Company ID Number: THE E-VERIFY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR EMPLOYERS USING A WEB SERVICES E-VERIFY EMPLOYER AGENT ARTICLE I PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY E-Verify is a program that electronically confirms an employee’s eligibility to work in the United States after completion of Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification (Form I-9). This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) explains certain features of the E-Verify program and describes specific responsibilities of the Employer, the E-Verify Employer Agent, the Social Security Administration (SSA), and DHS. References in this MOU to the Employer include the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent when acting on behalf of the Employer. For purposes of this MOU, the E-Verify browser refers to the website that provides direct access to the E-Verify system: https://e-verify.uscis.gov/emp/. You may access E-Verify directly free of charge via the E-Verify browser. Authority for the E-Verify program is found in Title IV, Subtitle A, of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), Pub. L. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009, as amended (8 U.S.C. § 1324a note). The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 22.18, “Employment Eligibility Verification” and Executive Order 12989, as amended, provide authority for Federal contractors and subcontractors (Federal contractor) to use E-Verify to verify the employment eligibility of certain employees working on Federal contracts. ARTICLE II RESPONSIBILITIES A. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EMPLOYER For purposes of this MOU, references to the Employer include the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent when acting on behalf of the Employer. 1.By enrolling in E-Verify and signing the applicable MOU, the Employer asserts that it is a legitimate company which intends to use E-Verify for legitimate purposes only and in accordance with the laws, regulations and DHS policies and procedures relating to the use of E-Verify. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 2 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number:Client Company ID Number: 2. The Employer agrees to display the following notices supplied by DHS (though the Web Services E- Verify Employer Agent) in a prominent place that is clearly visible to prospective employees and all employees who are to be verified through the system: a. Notice of E-Verify Participation b. Notice of Right to Work 3. The Employer agrees to provide to the SSA and DHS the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of the Employer representatives to be contacted about E-Verify. The Employer also agrees to keep such information current by providing updated information to SSA and DHS whenever the representatives’ contact information changes. 4. The Employer agrees to become familiar with and comply with the most recent version of the E-Verify User Manual. The Employer will obtain the E-Verify User Manual from the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent, and will be notified by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent when a new version of the E-Verify User Manual becomes available. 5. The Employer agrees to comply with current Form I-9 procedures, with two exceptions: a. If an employee presents a "List B" identity document, the Employer agrees to only accept "List B" documents that contain a photo. (List B documents identified in 8 C.F.R. 274a.2(b)(1)(B)) can be presented during the Form I-9 process to establish identity.) If an employee objects to the photo requirement for religious reasons, the Employer should contact E-Verify at 888-464-4218. b. If an employee presents a DHS Form I-551 (Permanent Resident Card), Form I-766 (Employment Authorization Document), or U.S. Passport or Passport Card to complete Form I-9, the Employer agrees to make a photocopy of the document and to retain the photocopy with the employee’s Form I-9. The Employer will use the photocopy to verify the photo and to assist DHS with its review of photo mismatches that employees contest. DHS may in the future designate other documents that activate the photo screening tool. Note: Subject only to the exceptions noted previously in this paragraph, employees still retain the right to present any List A, or List B and List C, document(s) to complete the Form I-9. 6. The Employer agrees to record the case verification number on the employee's Form I-9 or to print the screen containing the case verification number and attach it to the employee's Form I-9. 7. The Employer agrees that, although it participates in E-Verify, the Employer has a responsibility to complete, retain, and make available for inspection Forms I-9 that relate to its employees, or from other requirements of applicable regulations or laws, including the obligation to comply with the antidiscrimination requirements of section 274B of the INA with respect to Form I-9 procedures. a. The following modified requirements are the only exceptions to an Employer’s obligation to not employ unauthorized workers and comply with the anti-discrimination provision of the INA: (1) List B identity documents must have photos, as described in paragraph 6 above; (2) When an Employer confirms the identity and employment eligibility of newly hired employee using E-Verify procedures, the Employer establishes a rebuttable presumption that it has not violated section 274A(a)(1)(A) of 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 3 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number:Client Company ID Number: the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) with respect to the hiring of that employee; (3) If the Employer receives a final nonconfirmation for an employee, but continues to employ that person, the Employer must notify DHS and the Employer is subject to a civil money penalty between $550 and $1,100 for each failure to notify DHS of continued employment following a final nonconfirmation; (4) If the Employer continues to employ an employee after receiving a final nonconfirmation, then the Employer is subject to a rebuttable presumption that it has knowingly employed an unauthorized alien in violation of section 274A(a)(1)(A); and (5) no E-Verify participant is civilly or criminally liable under any law for any action taken in good faith based on information provided through the E-Verify. b.DHS reserves the right to conduct Form I-9 compliance inspections, as well as any other enforcement or compliance activity authorized by law, including site visits, to ensure proper use of E-Verify. 8.The Employer is strictly prohibited from creating an E-Verify case before the employee has been hired, meaning that a firm offer of employment was extended and accepted and Form I-9 was completed. The Employer agrees to create an E-Verify case for new employees within three Employer business days after each employee has been hired (after both Sections 1 and 2 of Form I-9 have been completed), and to complete as many steps of the E-Verify process as are necessary according to the E-Verify User Manual. If E-Verify is temporarily unavailable, the three-day time period will be extended until it is again operational in order to accommodate the Employer's attempting, in good faith, to make inquiries during the period of unavailability. 9.The Employer agrees not to use E-Verify for pre-employment screening of job applicants, in support of any unlawful employment practice, or for any other use that this MOU or the E-Verify User Manual does not authorize. 10.The Employer must use E-Verify (through its Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent) for all new employees. The Employer will not verify selectively and will not verify employees hired before the effective date of this MOU. Employers who are Federal contractors may qualify for exceptions to this requirement as described in Article II.B of this MOU. 11.The Employer agrees to follow appropriate procedures (see Article III below) regarding tentative nonconfirmations. The Employer must promptly notify employees in private of the finding and provide them with the notice and letter containing information specific to the employee’s E-Verify case. The Employer agrees to provide both the English and the translated notice and letter for employees with limited English proficiency to employees. The Employer agrees to provide written referral instructions to employees and instruct affected employees to bring the English copy of the letter to the SSA. The Employer must allow employees to contest the finding, and not take adverse action against employees if they choose to contest the finding, while their case is still pending. Further, when employees contest a tentative nonconfirmation based upon a photo mismatch, the Employer must take additional steps (see Article III.B below) to contact DHS with information necessary to resolve the challenge. 12.The Employer agrees not to take any adverse action against an employee based upon the employee's perceived employment eligibility status while SSA or DHS is processing the verification request unless the Employer obtains knowledge (as defined in 8 C.F.R. § 274a.1(l)) that the employee is not work authorized. The Employer understands that an initial inability of the SSA or DHS automated 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 4 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: verification system to verify work authorization, a tentative nonconfirmation, a case in continuance (indicating the need for additional time for the government to resolve a case), or the finding of a photo mismatch, does not establish, and should not be interpreted as, evidence that the employee is not work authorized. In any of such cases, the employee must be provided a full and fair opportunity to contest the finding, and if he or she does so, the employee may not be terminated or suffer any adverse employment consequences based upon the employee’s perceived employment eligibility status (including denying, reducing, or extending work hours, delaying or preventing training, requiring an employee to work in poorer conditions, withholding pay, refusing to assign the employee to a Federal contract or other assignment, or otherwise assuming that he or she is unauthorized to work) until and unless secondary verification by SSA or DHS has been completed and a final nonconfirmation has been issued. If the employee does not choose to contest a tentative nonconfirmation or a photo mismatch or if a secondary verification is completed and a final nonconfirmation is issued, then the Employer can find the employee is not work authorized and terminate the employee’s employment. Employers or employees with questions about a final nonconfirmation may call E-Verify at 1-888-464- 4218 (customer service) or 1-888-897-7781 (worker hotline). 13. The Employer agrees to comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and section 274B of the INA as applicable by not discriminating unlawfully against any individual in hiring, firing, employment eligibility verification, or recruitment or referral practices because of his or her national origin or citizenship status, or by committing discriminatory documentary practices. The Employer understands that such illegal practices can include selective verification or use of E-Verify except as provided in part D below, or discharging or refusing to hire employees because they appear or sound “foreign” or have received tentative nonconfirmations. The Employer further understands that any violation of the immigration-related unfair employment practices provisions in section 274B of the INA could subject the Employer to civil penalties, back pay awards, and other sanctions, and violations of Title VII could subject the Employer to back pay awards, compensatory and punitive damages. Violations of either section 274B of the INA or Title VII may also lead to the termination of its participation in E-Verify. If the Employer has any questions relating to the anti-discrimination provision, it should contact OSC at 1-800-255-8155 or 1-800-237-2515 (TDD). 14. The Employer agrees that it will use the information it receives from E-Verify (through its Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent) only to confirm the employment eligibility of employees as authorized by this MOU. The Employer agrees that it will safeguard this information, and means of access to it (such as Personal Identification Numbers and passwords), to ensure that it is not used for any other purpose and as necessary to protect its confidentiality, including ensuring that it is not disseminated to any person other than employees of the Employer who are authorized to perform the Employer's responsibilities under this MOU, except for such dissemination as may be authorized in advance by SSA or DHS for legitimate purposes. 15. The Employer agrees to notify DHS immediately in the event of a breach of personal information. Breaches are defined as loss of control or unauthorized access to E-Verify personal data. All suspected or confirmed breaches should be reported by calling 1-888-464-4218 or via email at E-Verify@dhs.gov. Please use “Privacy Incident – Password” in the subject line of your email when sending a breach report to E-Verify. 16. The Employer acknowledges that the information it receives from SSA through its Web Services 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 5 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: E-Verify Employer Agent is governed by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. § 552a(i)(1) and (3)) and the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1306(a)). Any person who obtains this information under false pretenses or uses it for any purpose other than as provided for in this MOU may be subject to criminal penalties. 17. The Employer agrees to cooperate with DHS and SSA in their compliance monitoring and evaluation of E-Verify, which includes permitting DHS, SSA, their contractors and other agents, upon reasonable notice, to review Forms I-9 and other employment records and to interview it and its employees regarding the Employer’s use of E-Verify, and to respond in a prompt and accurate manner to DHS requests for information relating to their participation in E-Verify. 18. The Employer shall not make any false or unauthorized claims or references about its participation in E-Verify on its website, in advertising materials, or other media. The Employer shall not describe its services as federally-approved, federally-certified, or federally-recognized, or use language with a similar intent on its website or other materials provided to the public. Entering into this MOU does not mean that E-Verify endorses or authorizes your E-Verify services and any claim to that effect is false. 19. The Employer shall not state in its website or other public documents that any language used therein has been provided or approved by DHS, USCIS or the Verification Division, without first obtaining the prior written consent of DHS. 20. The Employer agrees that E-Verify trademarks and logos may be used only under license by DHS/USCIS (see M-795 (Web)) and, other than pursuant to the specific terms of such license, may not be used in any manner that might imply that the Employer’s services, products, websites, or publications are sponsored by, endorsed by, licensed by, or affiliated with DHS, USCIS, or E-Verify. 21. The Employer understands that if it uses E-Verify procedures for any purpose other than as authorized by this MOU, the Employer may be subject to appropriate legal action and termination of its participation in E-Verify according to this MOU. B. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE WEB SERVICES E-VERIFY EMPLOYER AGENT 1. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to complete its Web Services interface no later than six months after the date the Web Services User signs this MOU. E-Verify considers your interface to be complete once it has been built pursuant to the Interface Control Agreement (ICA), submitted to E-Verify for testing, and approved for system access. 2. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to perform sufficient maintenance on the Web Services interface in accordance with the requirements listed in the ICA. These requirements include, but are not limited to, updating the Web Services interface to ensure that any updates or enhancements are incorporated no later than six months after the issuance of an ICA. Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents should be aware that this will require the investment of time and resources. Compliance with the requirements of the ICA must be carried out to the satisfaction of DHS and or its assignees. 3. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to provide to SSA and/or DHS the names, titles, addresses, e-mail addresses, and telephone numbers of the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent representative who will access information, as well as ensure cooperation, communication, and 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 6 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: coordination with E-Verify. In addition, Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents must provide to SSA and/or DHS the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of its clients and their staff who will access information through E-Verify. Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents must ensure the contact information is updated with SSA and DHS whenever the points of contact change. 4. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to become familiar with and comply with the E-Verify User Manual and provide a copy of the most current version of the manual to the Employer so that the Employer can become familiar with and comply with E-Verify policy and procedures. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to obtain a revised E-Verify User Manual as it becomes available and to provide a copy of the revised version to the Employer no later than 30 days after the manual becomes available. 5. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that any person accessing E-Verify on its behalf is trained on the most recent E-Verify policy and procedures. 6. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that any of its representatives who will perform employment verification cases will complete the E-Verify Tutorial before that individual initiates any cases. a. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that all of its representatives will take the refresher tutorials initiated by E-Verify as a condition of continued use of E-Verify, including any tutorials for Federal contractors, if any of the Employers represented by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent is a Federal contractor. b. Failure to complete a refresher tutorial will prevent the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and Employer from continued use of E-Verify. 7. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to grant E-Verify access only to current employees who need E-Verify access. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent must promptly terminate an employee’s E-Verify access if the employee is separated from the company or no longer needs access to E-Verify. 8. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to obtain the necessary equipment to use E- Verify as required by the E-Verify rules and regulations as modified from time to time. 9. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to, consistent with applicable laws, regulations, and policies, commit sufficient personnel and resources to meet the requirements of this MOU. 10. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to provide its clients with training on E-Verify processes, policies, and procedures. The E-Verify Employer Agent also agrees to provide its clients with ongoing E-Verify training as needed. E-Verify is not responsible for providing training to clients of E-Verify Employer Agents. 11. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to provide the Employer with the notices described in Article II.B.2 below. 12. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to create E-Verify cases for the Employer it represents in accordance with the E-Verify Manual, the E-Verify Web-Based Tutorial and all other 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 7 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: published E-Verify rules and procedures. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent will create E-Verify cases using information provided by the Employer and will immediately communicate the response back to the Employer. If E-Verify is temporarily unavailable, the three-day time period will be extended until it is again operational in order to accommodate the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s attempting, in good faith, to make inquiries on behalf of the Employer during the period of unavailability. If, however, the Web Services interface is unavailable due to no fault of E-Verify, then the three-day time period is not extended. In such a case, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent must use the E-Verify browser during the outage. 13. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to ensure that all notices, referral letters and any other materials otherwise including instructions regarding tentative nonconfirmations, will be consistent with the most current E-Verify tentative nonconfirmation notices and referral letters, which are available on E-Verify’s website. 14. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that any system or interface it develops will follow the steps for creating E-Verify cases and processing tentative nonconfirmations, as laid out in the ICA, this MOU and the User Manual, including but not limited to allowing an employer to close an invalid case where appropriate, allowing an employer to refer a tentative nonconfirmation only when an employee chooses to contest a tentative nonconfirmation (no automatic referrals), and referring a tentative nonconfirmation to the appropriate agency at the time the employer prints the referral letter and provides the letter to the employee. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent understands that any failure to make its system or interface consistent with proper E-Verify procedures can result in DHS terminating the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s agreement and access with or without notice. 15. When the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent receives notice from a client company that it has received a contract with the FAR clause, then the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent must update the company’s E-Verify profile within 30 days of the contract award date. 16. If data is transmitted between the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and its client, then the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to protect personally identifiable information during transmission to and from the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent. 17. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to notify DHS immediately in the event of a breach of personal information. Breaches are defined as loss of control or unauthorized access to E-Verify personal data. All suspected or confirmed breaches should be reported by calling 1-888-464- 4218 or via email at E-Verify@dhs.gov. Please use “Privacy Incident – Password” in the subject line of your email when sending a breach report to E-Verify. 18. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to fully cooperate with DHS and SSA in their compliance monitoring and evaluation of E-Verify, including permitting DHS, SSA, their contractors and other agents, upon reasonable notice, to review Forms I-9, employment records, and all records pertaining to the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s use of E-Verify, and to interview it and its employees regarding the use of E-Verify, and to respond in a timely and accurate manner to DHS requests for information relating to their participation in E-Verify. a. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to cooperate with DHS if DHS requests 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 8 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: information about the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s interface, including requests by DHS to view the actual interface operated by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent as well as related business documents. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to demonstrate for DHS the functionality of its interface to E-Verify upon request. b. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to demonstrate, if requested by DHS, that it has provided training to its clients that meets E-Verify standards. Training programs must provide a focused study of the topics covered in the E-Verify User Manual and pertinent Supplemental Guides. Furthermore, training programs and materials must be updated as E-Verify changes occur. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent is encouraged to incorporate information from existing E-Verify materials, including the Enrollment Quick Reference Guide, the E-Verify Employer Agent Client Handbook (formerly known as the Designated Agent Client Handbook), and existing tutorials and manuals into their training program. E-Verify also encourages the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent to supervise first-time use of the E-Verify browser or Web Services interface by its staff and Employer clients as part of any training program. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to submit its training program materials to DHS for review upon request. Failure to provide adequate training could, in some instances, lead to penalties as described in Article V.F.1. of this MOU. 19. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent shall not make any false or unauthorized claims or references about its participation in E-Verify on its website, in advertising materials, or other media. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent shall not describe its services as federally-approved, federally-certified, or federally-recognized, or use language with a similar intent on its website or other materials provided to the public. Entering into this MOU does not mean that E-Verify endorses or authorizes your Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent services and any claim to that effect is false. 20. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent shall not state in its website or other public documents that any language used therein has been provided or approved by DHS, USCIS or the Verification Division, without first obtaining the prior written consent of DHS. 21. The W eb Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that E-Verify trademarks and logos may be used only under license by DHS/USCIS (see M-795 (Web)) and, other than pursuant to the specific terms of such license, may not be used in any manner that might imply that the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s services, products, websites, or publications are sponsored by, endorsed by, licensed by, or affiliated with DHS, USCIS, or E-Verify. 22. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent understands that if it uses E-Verify procedures for any purpose other than as authorized by this MOU, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent may be subject to appropriate legal action and termination of its participation in E-Verify according to this MOU. C. RESPONSIBILITIES OF FEDERAL CONTRACTORS The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent shall ensure that the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and the Employers it represents carry out the following responsibilities if the Employer is a Federal contractor or becomes a federal contractor. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent should instruct the client to keep the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent informed about any changes or updates related to federal contracts. It is the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 9 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: responsibility to ensure that its clients are in compliance with all E-Verify policies and procedures. 1.If the Employer is a Federal contractor with the FAR E-Verify clause subject to the employment verification terms in Subpart 22.18 of the FAR, it will become familiar with and comply with the most current version of the E-Verify User Manual for Federal Contractors as well as the E-Verify Supplemental Guide for Federal Contractors. 2.In addition to the responsibilities of every employer outlined in this MOU, the Employer understands that if it is a Federal contractor subject to the employment verification terms in Subpart 22.18 of the FAR it must verify the employment eligibility of any “employee assigned to the contract” (as defined in FAR 22.1801). Once an employee has been verified through E-Verify by the Employer, the Employer may not reverify the employee through E-Verify. a.An Employer that is not enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor at the time of a contract award must enroll as a Federal contractor in the E-Verify program within 30 calendar days of contract award and, within 90 days of enrollment, begin to verify employment eligibility of new hires using E-Verify. The Employer must verify those employees who are working in the United States, whether or not they are assigned to the contract. Once the Employer begins verifying new hires, such verification of new hires must be initiated within three business days after the hire date. Once enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor, the Employer must begin verification of employees assigned to the contract within 90 calendar days after the date of enrollment or within 30 days of an employee’s assignment to the contract, whichever date is later. b.Employers enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor for 90 days or more at the time of a contract award must use E-Verify to begin verification of employment eligibility for new hires of the Employer who are working in the United States, whether or not assigned to the contract, within three business days after the date of hire. If the Employer is enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor for 90 calendar days or less at the time of contract award, the Employer must, within 90 days of enrollment, begin to use E-Verify to initiate verification of new hires of the contractor who are working in the United States, whether or not assigned to the contract. Such verification of new hires must be initiated within three business days after the date of hire. An Employer enrolled as a Federal contractor in E-Verify must begin verification of each employee assigned to the contract within 90 calendar days after date of contract award or within 30 days after assignment to the contract, whichever is later. c.Federal contractors that are institutions of higher education (as defined at 20 U.S.C. 1001(a)), state or local governments, governments of Federally recognized Indian tribes, or sureties performing under a takeover agreement entered into with a Federal agency under a performance bond may choose to only verify new and existing employees assigned to the Federal contract. Such Federal contractors may, however, elect to verify all new hires, and/or all existing employees hired after November 6, 1986. Employers in this category must begin verification of employees assigned to the contract within 90 calendar days after the date of enrollment or within 30 days of an employee’s assignment to the contract, whichever date is later. d.Upon enrollment, Employers who are Federal contractors may elect to verify employment eligibility of all existing employees working in the United States who were hired after November 6, 1986, instead of verifying only those employees assigned to a covered Federal contract. After enrollment, Employers must elect to verify existing staff following DHS procedures and begin 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 10 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: E-Verify verification of all existing employees within 180 days after the election. e.The Employer may use a previously completed Form I-9 as the basis for creating an E-Verify case for an employee assigned to a contract as long as: i.That Form I-9 is complete (including the SSN) and complies with Article II.A.6, ii.The employee’s work authorization has not expired, and iii.The Employer has reviewed the information reflected in the Form I-9 either in person or in communications with the employee to ensure that the employee’s Section 1, Form I-9 attestation has not changed (including, but not limited to, a lawful permanent resident alien having become a naturalized U.S. citizen). f.The Employer shall complete a new Form I-9 consistent with Article II.A.6 or update the previous Form I-9 to provide the necessary information if: i.The Employer cannot determine that Form I-9 complies with Article II.A.6, ii.The employee’s basis for work authorization as attested in Section 1 has expired or changed, or iii.The Form I-9 contains no SSN or is otherwise incomplete. Note: If Section 1 of Form I-9 is otherwise valid and up-to-date and the form otherwise complies with Article II.C.5, but reflects documentation (such as a U.S. passport or Form I-551) that expired after completing Form I-9, the Employer shall not require the production of additional documentation, or use the photo screening tool described in Article II.A.5, subject to any additional or superseding instructions that may be provided on this subject in the E-Verify User Manual. g.The Employer agrees not to require a second verification using E-Verify of any assigned employee who has previously been verified as a newly hired employee under this MOU or to authorize verification of any existing employee by any Employer that is not a Federal contractor based on this Article. 3.The Employer understands that if it is a Federal contractor, its compliance with this MOU is a performance requirement under the terms of the Federal contract or subcontract, and the Employer consents to the release of information relating to compliance with its verification responsibilities under this MOU to contracting officers or other officials authorized to review the Employer’s compliance with Federal contracting requirements. D. RESPONSIBILITIES OF SSA 1.SSA agrees to allow DHS to compare data provided by the Employer (through the E-Verify Employer Agent) against SSA’s database. SSA sends DHS confirmation that the data sent either matches or does not match the information in SSA’s database. 2.SSA agrees to safeguard the information the Employer provides (through the E-Verify Employer Agent) through E-Verify procedures. SSA also agrees to limit access to such information, as is appropriate by law, to individuals responsible for the verification of Social Security numbers or responsible for evaluation of E-Verify or such other persons or entities who may be authorized by SSA as governed by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. § 552a), the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1306(a)), and SSA regulations (20 CFR Part 401). 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 11 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: 3. SSA agrees to provide case results from its database within three Federal Government work days of the initial inquiry. E-Verify provides the information to the E-Verify Employer Agent. 4. SSA agrees to update SSA records as necessary if the employee who contests the SSA tentative nonconfirmation visits an SSA field office and provides the required evidence. If the employee visits an SSA field office within the eight Federal Government work days from the date of referral to SSA, SSA agrees to update SSA records, if appropriate, within the eight-day period unless SSA determines that more than eight days may be necessary. In such cases, SSA will provide additional instructions to the employee. If the employee does not visit SSA in the time allowed, E-Verify may provide a final nonconfirmation to the E-Verify Employer Agent. Note: If an Employer experiences technical problems, or has a policy question, the employer should contact E-Verify at 1-888-464-4218. E. RESPONSIBILITIES OF DHS 1. DHS agrees to provide the Employer with selected data from DHS databases to enable the Employer (through the E-Verify Employer Agent) to conduct, to the extent authorized by this MOU: a. Automated verification checks on alien employees by electronic means, and b. Photo verification checks (when available) on employees. 2. DHS agrees to assist the E-Verify Employer Agent with operational problems associated with its participation in E-Verify. DHS agrees to provide the E-Verify Employer Agent names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of DHS representatives to be contacted during the E-Verify process. 3. DHS agrees to provide to the E-Verify Employer Agent with access to E-Verify training materials as well as an E-Verify User Manual that contain instructions on E-Verify policies, procedures, and requirements for both SSA and DHS, including restrictions on the use of E-Verify. 4. DHS agrees to train E-Verify Employer Agents on all important changes made to E-Verify through the use of mandatory refresher tutorials and updates to the E-Verify User Manual. Even without changes to E-Verify, DHS reserves the right to require E-Verify Employer Agents to take mandatory refresher tutorials. 5. DHS agrees to provide to the Employer (through the E-Verify Employer Agent) a notice, which indicates the Employer's participation in E-Verify. DHS also agrees to provide to the Employer anti- discrimination notices issued by the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC), Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice. 6. DHS agrees to issue each of the E-Verify Employer Agent’s E-Verify users a unique user identification number and password that permits them to log in to E-Verif y. 7. DHS agrees to safeguard the information the Employer provides (through the E-Verify Employer Agent), and to limit access to such information to individuals responsible for the verification process, for evaluation of E-Verify, or to such other persons or entities as may be authorized by applicable law. Information will be used only to verify the accuracy of Social Security numbers and employment eligibility, to enforce the INA and Federal criminal laws, and to administer Federal contracting 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 12 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: requirements. 8. DHS agrees to provide a means of automated verification that provides (in conjunction with SSA verification procedures) confirmation or tentative nonconfirmation of employees' employment eligibility within three Federal Government work days of the initial inquiry. 9. DHS agrees to provide a means of secondary verification (including updating DHS records) for employees who contest DHS tentative nonconfirmations and photo mismatch tentative nonconfirmations. This provides final confirmation or nonconfirmation of the employees' employment eligibility within 10 Federal Government work days of the date of referral to DHS, unless DHS determines that more than 10 days may be necessary. In such cases, DHS will provide additional verification instructions. ARTICLE III REFERRAL OF INDIVIDUALS TO SSA AND DHS A. REFERRAL TO SSA 1. If the Employer receives a tentative nonconfirmation issued by SSA, the Employer must print the notice as directed by E-Verify. The Employer must promptly notify employees in private of the finding and provide them with the notice and letter containing information specific to the employee’s E-Verify case. The Employer also agrees to provide both the English and the translated notice and letter for employees with limited English proficiency to employees. The Employer agrees to provide written referral instructions to employees and instruct affected employees to bring the English copy of the letter to the SSA. The Employer must allow employees to contest the finding, and not take adverse action against employees if they choose to contest the finding, while their case is still pending. 2. The Employer agrees to obtain the employee’s response about whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation as soon as possible after the Employer receives the tentative nonconfirmation. Only the employee may determine whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation. 3. After a tentative nonconfirmation, the Employer will refer employees to SSA field offices only as directed by E-Verify. The Employer must record the case verification number, review the employee information submitted to E-Verify to identify any errors, and find out whether the employee contests the tentative nonconfirmation. The Employer will transmit the Social Security number, or any other corrected employee information that SSA requests, to SSA for verification again if this review indicates a need to do so. 4. The Employer will instruct the employee to visit an SSA office within eight Federal Government work days. SSA will electronically transmit the result of the referral to the Employer within 10 Federal Government work days of the referral unless it determines that more than 10 days is necessary. 5. While waiting for case results, the Employer agrees to check the E-Verify system regularly for case updates. 6. The Employer agrees not to ask the employee to obtain a printout from the Social Security 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 13 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number:Client Company ID Number: Administration number database (the Numident) or other written verification of the SSN from the SSA. B. REFERRAL TO DHS 1. If the Employer receives a tentative nonconfirmation issued by DHS, the Employer must promptly notify employees in private of the finding and provide them with the notice and letter containing information specific to the employee’s E-Verify case. The Employer also agrees to provide both the English and the translated notice and letter for employees with limited English proficiency to employees. The Employer must allow employees to contest the finding, and not take adverse action against employees if they choose to contest the finding, while their case is still pending. 2. The Employer agrees to obtain the employee’s response about whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation as soon as possible after the Employer receives the tentative nonconfirmation. Only the employee may determine whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation. 3. The Employer agrees to refer individuals to DHS only when the employee chooses to contest a tentative nonconfirmation. 4. If the employee contests a tentative nonconfirmation issued by DHS, the Employer will instruct the employee to contact DHS through its toll-free hotline (as found on the referral letter) within eight Federal Government work days. 5. If the Employer finds a photo mismatch, the Employer must provide the photo mismatch tentative nonconfirmation notice and follow the instructions outlined in paragraph 1 of this section for tentative nonconfirmations, generally. 6. The Employer agrees that if an employee contests a tentative nonconfirmation based upon a photo mismatch, the Employer will send a copy of the employee’s Form I-551, Form I-766, U.S. Passport, or passport card to DHS for review by: a. Scanning and uploading the document, or b. Sending a photocopy of the document by express mail (furnished and paid for by the employer). 7. The Employer understands that if it cannot determine whether there is a photo match/mismatch, the Employer must forward the employee’s documentation to DHS as described in the preceding paragraph. The Employer agrees to resolve the case as specified by the DHS representative who will determine the photo match or mismatch. 8. DHS will electronically transmit the result of the referral to the Employer within 10 Federal Government work days of the referral unless it determines that more than 10 days is necessary. 9. While waiting for case results, the Employer agrees to check the E-Verify system regularly for case updates. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 14 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: ARTICLE IV SERVICE PROVISIONS A. NO SERVICE FEES 1.SSA and DHS will not charge the Employer or the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent for verification services performed under this MOU. The Employer is responsible for providing equipment needed to make inquiries. To access E-Verify, an Employer will need a personal computer with Internet access. ARTICLE V SYSTEM SECURITY AND MAINTENANCE A. DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 1.Software developed by Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents must comply with federally- mandated information security policies and industry security standards to include but not limited to: a.Public Law 107-347, “E-Government Act of 2002, Title III, Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA),” December 2002. b.Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum (M-10-15), “FY 2010 Reporting Instructions for the Federal Information Security Management Act and Agency Privacy Management,” April 2010. c.National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) and Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS). d.International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission (ISO/IEC) 27002, Information Technology — Security Techniques — Code of Practice for Information Security Management. 2.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to update its Web Services interface to reflect system enhancements within six months from the date DHS notifies the Web Services User of the system update. The Web Services User will receive notice from DHS in the form of an Interface Control Agreement (ICA). The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to institute changes to its interface as identified in the ICA, including all functionality identified and all data elements detailed therein. 3.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to demonstrate progress of its efforts to update its Web Services interface if and when DHS requests such progress reports. 4.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent acknowledges that if its system enhancements are not completed to the satisfaction of DHS or its assignees within six months from the date DHS notifies the Web Services User of the system update, then the Web Services User’s E-Verify account may be suspended, and support for previous releases of E-Verify may no longer be available to the Web Services User. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent also acknowledges that DHS may suspend the Web Services User’s account after the six-month period has elapsed. 5.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to incorporate error handling logic into its 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 15 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: development or software to accommodate and act in a timely fashion should an error code be returned. 6. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to complete the technical requirements testing which is confirmed upon receiving approval of test data and connectivity between the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and DHS. 7. DHS will not reimburse any Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or software developer who has expended resources in the development or maintenance of a Web Services interface if that party is unable, or becomes unable, to meet any of the requirements set forth in this MOU. 8. Housing, development, infrastructure, maintenance, and testing of the Web Services applications may take place outside the United States and its territories, but testing must be conducted to ensure that the code is correct and secure. 9. If the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent includes an electronic Form I-9 as part of its interface, then it must comply with the standards for electronic retention of Form I-9 found in 8 CFR 274a.2(e). B. INFORMATION SECURITY REQUIREMENTS Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents performing verification services under this MOU must ensure that information that is shared between the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and DHS is appropriately protected comparable to the protection provided when the information is within the DHS environment [OMB Circular A-130 Appendix III]. To achieve this level of information security, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to institute the following procedures: 1. Conduct periodic assessments of risk, including the magnitude of harm that could result from the unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, or destruction of information and information systems that support the operations and assets of the DHS, SSA, and the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and its clients; 2. Develop policies and procedures that are based on risk assessments, cost-effectively reduce information security risks to an acceptable level, and ensure that information security is addressed throughout the life cycle of each organizational information system; 3. Implement subordinate plans for providing adequate information security for networks, facilities, information systems, or groups of information systems, as appropriate; 4. Conduct security awareness training to inform the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s personnel (including contractors and other users of information systems that support the operations and assets of the organization) of the information security risks associated with their activities and their responsibilities in complying with organizational policies and procedures designed to reduce these risks; 5. Develop periodic testing and evaluation of the effectiveness of information security policies, procedures, practices, and security controls to be performed with a frequency depending on risk, but no less than once per year; 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 16 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: 6. Develop a process for planning, implementing, evaluating, and documenting remedial actions to address any deficiencies in the information security policies, procedures, and practices of the organization; 7. Implement procedures for detecting, reporting, and responding to security incidents; 8. Create plans and procedures to ensure continuity of operations for information systems that support the operations and assets of the organization; 9. In information-sharing environments, the information owner is responsible for establishing the rules for appropriate use and protection of the subject information and retains that responsibility even when the information is shared with or provided to other organizations [NIST SP 800-37]. 10. DHS reserves the right to restrict Web Services calls from certain IP addresses. 11. DHS reserves the right to audit the W eb Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s application. 12. Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents and Software Developers agree to cooperate willingly with the DHS assessment of information security and privacy practices used by the company to develop and maintain the software. C. DATA PROTECTION AND PRIVACY REQUIREMENTS 1. Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents must practice proper Internet security; this means using HTTP over SSL/TLS (also known as HTTPS) when accessing DHS information resources such as E-Verify [NIST SP 800-95]. Internet security practices like this are necessary because Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), which provides a basic messaging framework on which Web Services can be built, allows messages to be viewed or modified by attackers as messages traverse the Internet and is not independently designed with all the necessary security protocols for E-Verify use. 2. In accordance with DHS standards, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to appropriately protect the information shared under this MOU against loss, theft, misuse, unauthorized access, and improper disclosure, copying use, modification or deletion. 3. Any data transmission requiring encryption shall comply with the following standards: • Products using FIPS 197 Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) algorithms with at least 256- bit encryption that has been validated under FIPS 140-2. • NSA Type 2 or Type 1 encryption. 4. User ID Management (Set Standard): All information exchanged between the parties under this MOU will be done only through authorized Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent representatives identified above. 5. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to use the E-Verify browser instead of its own interface if it has not yet upgraded its interface to comply with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) system changes. In addition, Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents whose interfaces do not support 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 17 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number:Client Company ID Number: the Form I-9 from 2/2/2009 or 8/7/2009 should also use the E-Verify browser until the system upgrade is completed. 6.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to use the E-Verify browser instead of its own interface if it has not completed updates to its system within six months from the date DHS notifies the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent of the system update. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent can resume use of its interface once it is up-to-date, unless the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent has been suspended or terminated from continued use of the system. D. COMMUNICATIONS 1.Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents and Software Developers agree to develop an electronic system that is not subject to any agreement that would restrict access to and use of by an agency of the United States. 2.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to develop effective controls to ensure the integrity, accuracy and reliability of its electronic system. 3.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to develop an inspection and quality assurance program that regularly, at least once per year, evaluates the electronic system, and includes periodic checks of electronically stored information. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to share the results of its regular inspection and quality assurance program with DHS upon request. 4.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to develop an electronic system with the ability to produce legible copies of applicable notices, letters, etc. 5.All information exchanged between the parties under this MOU will be in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies, including but not limited to, information security guidelines of the sending party with respect to any information that is deemed Personally Identifiable Information (PII), including but not limited to the employee or applicant’s Social Security number, alien number, date of birth, or other information that may be used to identify the individual. 6.Suspected and confirmed information security breaches must be reported to DHS according to Article II.A.17. Reporting such breaches does not relieve the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent from further requirements as directed by state and local law. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent is subject to applicable state laws regarding data protection and incident reporting in addition to the requirements herein. E. SOFTWARE DEVELOPER RESTRICTIONS 1.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that if it develops a Web Services interface and sells such interface, then it can be held liable for any misuse by the company that purchases the interface. It is the responsibility of the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent to ensure that its interface is used in accordance with E-Verify policies and procedures. 2.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to provide software updates to each client who purchases its software. Because of the frequency Web Services updates, an ongoing relationship between the software developer and the client is necessary. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 18 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: 3. DHS reserves the right to terminate the access of any software developer with or without notice who creates or uses an interface that does not comply with E-Verify procedures. 4. Web Services Software Developers pursuing software development independent of serving clients as a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent are not eligible to receive an ICA. At this time, E-Verify does not permit Web Services software development without also being a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or Web Services Employer. F. PENALTIES 1. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that any failure on its part to comply with the terms of the MOU may result in account suspension, termination, or other adverse action. 2. DHS is not liable for any financial losses to Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent, its clients, or any other party as a result of your account suspension or termination. ARTICLE VI MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION A. MODIFICATION 1. This MOU is effective upon the signature of all parties and shall continue in effect for as long as the SSA and DHS operates the E-Verify program unless modified in writing by the mutual consent of all parties. 2. Any and all E-Verify system enhancements by DHS or SSA, including but not limited to E-Verify checking against additional data sources and instituting new verification policies or procedures, will be covered under this MOU and will not cause the need for a supplemental MOU that outlines these changes. B. TERMINATION 1. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent may terminate this MOU and its participation in E-Verify at any time upon 30 days prior written notice to the other parties. In addition, any Employer represented by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent may voluntarily terminate its MOU upon giving DHS 30 days’ written notice. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent may not refuse to terminate the Employer based upon an outstanding bill for verification services. 2. Notwithstanding Article V, part A of this MOU, DHS may terminate this MOU, and thereby the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s participation in E-Verify, with or without notice at any time if deemed necessary because of the requirements of law or policy, or upon a determination by SSA or DHS that there has been a breach of system integrity or security by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or Employer, or a failure on the part of either party to comply with established E-Verify procedures and/or legal requirements. The Employer understands that if it is a Federal contractor, termination of this MOU by any party for any reason may negatively affect the performance of its contractual responsibilities. Similarly, the Employer understands that if it is in a state where E-Verify is mandatory, termination of this by any party MOU may negatively affect the Employer’s business. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 19 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: 3.A Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent for an Employer that is a Federal contractor may terminate this MOU when the Federal contract that requires its participation in E-Verify is terminated or completed. In such cases, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent must provide written notice to DHS. If the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent fails to provide such notice, then that Employer will remain an E-Verify participant, will remain bound by the terms of this MOU that apply to non-Federal contractor participants, and will be required to use the E-Verify procedures to verify the employment eligibility of all newly hired employees. 4.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that E-Verify is not liable for any losses, financial or otherwise, if the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or the Employer is terminated from E-Verify. ARTICLE VII PARTIES A. Some or all SSA and DHS responsibilities under this MOU may be performed by contractor(s), and SSA and DHS may adjust verification responsibilities between each other as necessary. By separate agreement with DHS, SSA has agreed to perform its responsibilities as described in this MOU. B. Nothing in this MOU is intended, or should be construed, to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any third party against the United States, its agencies, officers, or employees, or against the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent, its agents, officers, or employees. C. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent may not assign, directly or indirectly, whether by operation of law, change of control or merger, all or any part of its rights or obligations under this MOU without the prior written consent of DHS, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Any attempt to sublicense, assign, or transfer any of the rights, duties, or obligations herein is void. D. Each party shall be solely responsible for defending any claim or action against it arising out of or related to E-Verify or this MOU, whether civil or criminal, and for any liability wherefrom, including (but not limited to) any dispute between the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or the Employer and any other person or entity regarding the applicability of Section 403(d) of IIRIRA to any action taken or allegedly taken by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or the Employer. E. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent understands that its participation in E-Verify is not confidential information and may be disclosed as authorized or required by law and DHS or SSA policy, including but not limited to, Congressional oversight, E-Verify publicity and media inquiries, determinations of compliance with Federal contractual requirements, and responses to inquiries under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). F. The individuals whose signatures appear below represent that they are authorized to enter into this MOU on behalf of the Employer, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and DHS respectively. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent understands that any inaccurate statement, representation, data or other information provided to DHS may subject the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent, as the case may be, its subcontractors, its employees, or its representatives to: (1) prosecution for false statements pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or; (2) immediate termination of its MOU and/or; (3) possible debarment or suspension. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 20 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 21 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number:Client Company ID Number: Approved by: Employer Name (Please Type or Print) Title Signature Date E-Verify Employer Agent Name (Please Type or Print) Title Signature Date Department of Homeland Security – Verification Division Name (Please Type or Print) Title Signature Date 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 22 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number:Client Company ID Number: Information Required for the E-Verify Program Information relating to your Company: Company Name Company Facility Address Company Alternate Address County or Parish Employer Identification Number North American Industry Classification Systems Code Parent Company Number of Employees Number of Sites Verified for 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 23 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: Are you verifying for more than 1 site? If yes, please provide the number of sites verified for in each State: 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 24 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: Information relating to the Program Administrator(s) for your Company on policy questions or operational problems: 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 25 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ColUer County eo-mer County ---------.__;;_ Administrative Services Department Procurement Services Division Solicitation 18-7432-MP Form 3: Immigration Affidavit Certification This :6-ffidavit is required and should be signed, by an authorized principal of the firm and submitted with formal solicitation subm~~ls. Further, Vendors are required to be enrolled in the E-Verify program (https ://www.e-ver ify .gov/), at the time of the sub~1ss1on of the Vendor's proposal/bid. Acceptable evidence of your enrollment consists ofa copy of the properly completed E- Verify Company Profile page or a copy of the fully executed E-Verify Memorandum ofUnderstaoding for the company which will be produced aJ the time of the submission of the Vendor's proposal/bid or within five (5) day of the County's Notice of Recommend Award FAILURE TO EXECUTE IBIS AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION AND SUBMIT WITH VENDOR'S PROPOSAL/BID MAY DEEM ffiE VENDOR'S AS NON-RESPONSIVE. Collier County will not intentionally award County contracts to any Vendor who knowingly employs unauthorized alien workers, constituting a violation of the employment provision contained in 8 U.S.C. Section 1324 a(e) Section 274A(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"). Collier County may consider the employment by any Vendor of unauthorized aliens a violation of Section 274A (e) of the INA. Such Violation by the recipient of the Employment Provisions contained in Section 274A (e) of the INA shall be grounds for unilateral termination of the contract by Collier County. Vendor attests that they are fully compliant with all applicable immigration laws (specifically to the 1986 Immigration Act and subsequent Amendment(s)) and agrees to comply with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding with E-Verify and to provide proof of enrollment in The Employment Eligibility Verification System (E-Verify), operated by the Department of Homeland Security in partnership with the Social Security Administration at the time of submission of the Vendor's proposa.Vbid. State of r:: Lo v-1..ci o.. County of (\A.~ (VY\ -'D a. d.e. Jacobs Eni:iineerini:i Group, Inc. Company Name M}LlJ@0N 7 Signature William Beddow.Client Account Manai:ier Print Name and Title The for~ing instrument was acknowledg~ before me by or D online notarimtion, this ~ day of ri. v-9 de;. t (month), J-O~O {year), by __..!~!..lll~.Q..--'-~~!I.U.lic:... ____ .....;(name of person acknowledging). OR Produced Identification Type of Identification Produced 7/6/2020 10:08 AM (Signature ofNotary Public -State of Florida) C 0-..< \ 0. \\,\C ro. "Z..Cl (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name ofNotary Public) lii:r.,:?~, CARLAIIARIAERAZO f•: i•\ MVCOMMISSIONIGG255886 \ .,_i__J EXPR8: Oclober 15, 2022 I ,• ~if.1 llondtdllwNolllyNJllc~ p.21 •••UPDA'fH IAlliliAllt' 181 WJOO• 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432- ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Form 4: Vendor Submittal – Local Vendor Preference Certification (Check Appropriate Boxes Below) State of Florida (Select County if Vendor is described as a Local Business) Collier County Lee County Vendor affirms that it is a local business as defined by the Procurement Ordinance of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the Regulations Thereto. As defined in Section Fifteen of the Collier County Procurement Ordinance: Local business means the vendor has a current Business Tax Receipt issued by the Collier County Tax Collector prior to bid or proposal submission to do business within Collier County, and that identifies the business with a permanent physical business address located within the limits of Collier County from which the vendor’s staff operates and performs business in an area zoned for the conduct of such business. A Post Office Box or a facility that receives mail, or a non-permanent structure such as a construction trailer, storage shed, or other non-permanent structure shall not be used for the purpose of establishing said physical address. In addition to the foregoing, a vendor shall not be considered a "local business" unless it contributes to the economic development and well-being of Collier County in a verifiable and measurable way. This may include, but not be limited to, the retention and expansion of employment opportunities, support and increase to the County's tax base, and residency of employees and principals of the business within Collier County. Vendors shall affirm in writing their compliance with the foregoing at the time of submitting their bid or proposal to be eligible for consideration as a "local business" under this section. A vendor who misrepresents the Local Preference status of its firm in a proposal or bid submitted to the County will lose the privilege to claim Local Preference status for a period of up to one year under this section. Vendor must complete the following information: Year Business Established in Collier County or Lee County: ________ Number of Employees (Including Owner(s) or Corporate Officers):_________ Number of Employees Living in Collier County or Lee (Including Owner(s) or Corporate Officers):___+25____ If requested by the County, Vendor will be required to provide documentation substantiating the information given in this certification . Failure to do so will result in vendor’s submission being deemed not applicable. Sign and Date Certification: Under penalties of perjury, I certify that the information shown on this form is correct to my knowledge. Company Name: _________________________________________ Date: _____________________________ Address in Collier or Lee County: _____________________________________________________________________ Signature: ____________________________________________ Title: _____________________________ Solicitation 18-7432-MPCollier County 7/6/2020 10:08 AM p. 23 2004 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) COLLIER COUNTY BUSINESS TAX BUSINESS TAX NUMBER: 102498 COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR-2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE· NAPLES FLORIDA 34104 • (239) 252-24n VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT: www.colllertax.com THIS RECEIPT EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 LOCATION· 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD #505 ZONED: COMM / PUD SIC#8711 BUSINESS PHONE: 720-286-2407 STATE OR COUNTY UC#: 25861 ����� 1/11�1\ \,;-,�� i CLASSIFICATION. ENGINEERING BUSINESS ��/ ,, CLASSIFICATION CODE: 03600101 . t1 This document is a business tax only. This is not certification It does not permit the licensee to violate any existing regulatory nor does tt exempt the licensee from any other taxes or permits that DISPLAY AT PLACE OF BUSINESS FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO IS CONTRARY TO LOCAL LAWS. CH2M HILL ENGINEERS INC CH2M HILL ENGINEERS INC TTN: TAX DEPT 191 S JAMAICA ST NGLEWOOD, CO 80112 -THIS TAX IS NON-REFUN0ABLE- 0ATE 09/24/2019 AMOUNT 30.00 RECEIPT 502-20-00134585-i41tJU1 �, � 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal 9.E.6Packet Pg. 463Attachment: Jacobs Proposal 9.E.6Packet Pg. 464Attachment: Jacobs Form 5 Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP, Principal Planner (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Collier County, FL (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov FAX: Telephone: 239-252-5779 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: Randall Boulevard Corridor Study Completion Date: 10/2019 Project Budget: _$662,496_________________________ Project Number of Days: 1020____________________ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10+ 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Form 5 Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP, Principal Planner (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Collier County, FL (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov FAX: Telephone: 239-252-5779 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: Safe Routes to School Grant(s) Included Grant Application(s), Exhibit(s), Roadway Safety Audit, Conceptual Sidewalk/Drainage Design(s) Completion Date: _2016 -2018_ Project Budget: _$55,000_________________________ Project Number of Days: 90______________________ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10+ 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10+ 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 9 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10+ 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 99 Mr. Gramer has an excellent ability to convey the needs of a project with graphics, photos and creating a story that grantors want to fund. I would hire him for any grant submittal. _ÉÜÜt|Çx _tÇàé KBGBEC 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Form 5 Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Trinity Scott – Collier County Transportation Planning Manager (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Collier County Transportation Planning (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: Trinity.Scott@colliercountyfl.gov> FAX: Telephone: 239-252-5832 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: T.I.G.E.R. Grant (2017): Immokalee Complete Streets - $16M (Won) Completion Date: 12/2017 Project Budget: _$50,000_____ Project Number of Days: 90 Days ______ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Form 5 Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Trinity Scott – Collier County Transportation Planning Manager (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Collier County Transportation Planning (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: Trinity.Scott@colliercountyfl.gov> FAX: Telephone: 239-252-5832 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: Transportation Planning 2013-2020 Completion Date: 6/2020 Project Budget: _$750,000+ (50+ Misc Tasks) _____ Project Number of Days: 8+ Years ______ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 9 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 99 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Form 5 Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP, Chad Polk, PE (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Don Scott, PE – Lee County MPO Director (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Lee County MPO (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: dscott@Leempo.com FAX: 239-790-2695 Telephone: 239-330-2241 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: Lee County Bicycle Pedestrian Safety Action Plan Update Completion Date: 6/2020 Project Budget: _$75,838_________________________ Project Number of Days: 365____________________ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 9 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 9 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 9 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 9 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 9 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 95 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Form 5 Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Katie Habgood, AICP (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Gary D. Harrell, Director (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: harrell@ccmpo.com FAX: Telephone: 941-883-3535 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: 2040 LRTP Completion Date: 10/2015 Project Budget: _$215,000_____ Project Number of Days: 548 Days ______ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.B GRANT CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES Exhibit 1.B – 2 COLLIER COUNTY Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters Primary Covered Transactions (1)The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and itsprincipals: (a)Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, orvoluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b)Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civiljudgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection withobtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction orcontract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commissionof embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making falsestatements, or receiving stolen property; (c)Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity(Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (l)(b)of this certification; and (d)Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more publictransactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. (2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in thiscertification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. ________________________________ _____________________________________ Name DUNS Number ________________________________ _____________________________________ Title Tax ID Number ________________________________ Firm _________________________________________________________________________ Street Address, City, State, Zip __________________________________ Signature RPS 18-7432-MP,<<24 of 31>> Solicitation 18-7432-MPCollier County 7/6/2020 10:08 AM p. 37 95-4081636 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) N/A9.E.6Packet Pg. 472Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.6Packet Pg. 473Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.6Packet Pg. 474Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.6Packet Pg. 475Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) IS THE ACTIVITY OF THIS CONTRACT,  CONSTRUCTION?               Y N CONSULTATION?               Y N OTHER?               Y N DBE, MBE, WBE  VET, SMB8A SUBCONTRACTOR OR SUPPLIER  NAME TYPE OF WORK OR  SPECIALTY ETHNICITY CODE  (See Below) SUB/SUPPLIER  DOLLAR AMOUNT PERCENT OF CONTRACT  DOLLARS TOTALS: NOTE: ETHNICITY CODE Black American BA Hispanic American HA Native American NA Subcont. Asian American SAA Asian‐Pacific American APA Non‐Minority Women NMW Other: not of any other group listed O DATE TELEPHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER IS THE PRIME A FLORIDA‐CERTIFIED DISADVANTAGED,  MINORITY OR WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE    (DBE/MBE/WBE)?  OR HAVE A SMALL DISADVANTAGED  BUSINESS 8A CERTIFICATION FROM THE SMALL BUSINESS  ADMINISTRATION?   OR A SERVICE DISABLED VETERAN?  VETERAN?                Y              N IS THIS SUBMISSION A REVISION?             Y                N SDB 8A?Y              N CONTRACT DOLLAR AMOUNT C.SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY PRIME VENDOR/CONTRACTOR NAME OF SUBMITTER DATE TITLE OF SUBMITTER WBE?Y              N MBE?Y              N DBE?Y              N This information is used to track and report anticipated DBE or MBE participation in federally‐funded contracts.  The anticipated DBE or  MBE amount is voluntary and will not become part of the contractual terms.  This form must be submitted at time of response to a  solicitation.  If and when awarded a County contract, the prime will be asked to update the information for the grant compliance files. COLLIER COUNTY ANTICIPATED DISADVANTAGED, MINORITY, WOMEN OR VETERAN PARTICIPATION STATEMENT Status will be verified.  Unverifable statuses will require the Vendor/Prime Contractor to either provide a revised statement or provide source  documentation that validates a status.   Contractor means an entity that receives a contract. B.IF PRIME HAS SUBCONTRACTOR OR SUPPLIER WHO IS A DISADVANTAGED MINORITY, WOMEN‐OWNED, SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN OR SERVICE DISABLED VETERAN, PRIME IS TO COMPLETE THIS NEXT SECTION A.VENDOR/PRIME CONTRACTOR INFORMATION PRIME NAME PRIME FEID NUMBER DEPARTMENT NAME COLLIER CONTRACT # (IFB/RFP or PO/REQ) IF YES, REVISION NUMBER__________ EMAIL ADDRESS OF PRIME (SUBMITTER) D.SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY COLLIER COUNTY ACCEPTED BY: GRANT PROGRAM/CONTRACT Exhibit 1.B – 4 RPS 18-7432-MP,<<26 of 31>> Solicitation 18-7432-MPCollier County 7/6/2020 10:08 AM p. 39 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Prime Contractor/Prime Consultant: Address and Phone Number: Procurement Number/Advertisement Number: 1. Federal Tax ID Number:6.DBE 8.Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name:Non-DBE Less than $ 1 million 3. Phone Number:Between $ 1-5 million 4. Address Between $ 5-10 million 7.Subcontractor Between $ 10-15 million Subconsultant More than $ 15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number:6.DBE 8.Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name:Non-DBE Less than $ 1 million 3. Phone Number:Between $ 1-5 million 4. Address Between $ 5-10 million 7.Subcontractor Between $ 10-15 million Subconsultant More than $ 15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number:6.DBE 8.Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name:Non-DBE Less than $ 1 million 3. Phone Number:Between $ 1-5 million 4. Address Between $ 5-10 million 7.Subcontractor Between $ 10-15 million Subconsultant More than $ 15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number:6.DBE 8.Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name:Non-DBE Less than $ 1 million 3. Phone Number:Between $ 1-5 million 4. Address Between $ 5-10 million 7.Subcontractor Between $ 10-15 million Subconsultant More than $ 15 million 5. Year Firm Established: The list below is intended to be a listing of firms that are, or attempting to, participate on the project numbered above. The list must include the firm bidding or quoting as prime, as well as subs and suppliers quoting for participation. Prime contractors and consultants must provide information for Numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4; and, should provide any information they have for Numbers 5, 6, 7, and 8. This form must be submitted with the bid package. COLLIER COUNTY GRANT COMPLIANCE FORM BID OPPORTUNITY LIST FOR COMMODITIES, CONTRACTUAL SERVICES OR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES It is the policy of Collier County that disadvantaged businesses and minority vendors, as defined in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) or Florida Statutes (FS), must have the opportunity to participate on contracts with federal and/or state grant assistance. Exhibit 1.B – 5 RPS 18-7432-MP,<<27 of 31>> Solicitation 18-7432-MPCollier County 7/6/2020 10:08 AM p. 40 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.B GRANT CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES COLLIER COUNTY Conflict of Interest Certification _______________________ Collier County Solicitation No. I, ________________________________________, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, neither I nor my spouse, dependent child, general partner, or any organization for which I am serving as an officer, director, trustee, general partner or employee, or any person or organization with whom I am negotiating or have an arrangement concerning prospective employment has a financial interest in this matter. I further certify to the best of my knowledge that this matter will not affect the financial interests of any member of my household. Also, to the best of my knowledge, no member of my household; no relative with whom I have a close relationship; no one with whom my spouse, parent or dependent child has or seeks employment; and no organization with which I am seeking a business relationship nor which I now serve actively or have served within the last year are parties or represent a party to the matter. I also acknowledge my responsibility to disclose the acquisition of any financial or personal interest as described above that would be affected by the matter, and to disclose any interest I, or anyone noted above, has in any person or organization that does become involved in, or is affected at a later date by, the conduct of this matter. Name Signature Position Date Privacy Act Statement Title I of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.), Executive Order 12674 and 5 CFR Part 2634, Subpart I require the reporting of this information. The primary use of the information on this form is for review by officials of The Justice Department to determine compliance with applicable federal conflict of interest laws and regulations. Additional disclosures of the information on this report may be made: (1) to a federal, state or local law enforcement agency if the Justice Department becomes aware of a violation or potential violation of law or regulations; (2) to a court or party in a court or federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party or in order to comply with a judge-issued subpoena; (3) to a source when necessary to obtain information relevant to a conflict of interest investigation or decision; (4) to the National Archives and Records Administration or the General Services Administration in records management inspections; (5) to the Office of Management and Budget during legislative coordination on private relief legislation; and (6) in response to a request for discovery or for the appearance of a witness in a judicial or administrative proceeding, if the information is relevant to the subject matter. This confidential certification will not be disclosed to any requesting person unless authorized by law. See also the OGE/GOVT-2 executive branch-wide Privacy Act system of records. Exhibit 1.B – 7 RPS 18-7432-MP,<<29 of 31>> Solicitation 18-7432-MPCollier County 7/6/2020 10:08 AM p. 42 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.B GRANT CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES Exhibit 1.B – 8 COLLIER COUNTY Certification Regarding Lobbying The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge, that: (1)No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2)If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form- LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions. (3)The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by 31, U.S.C. § 1352 (as amended by the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995). Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The Contractor, __________________________, certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each statement of its certification and disclosure, if any. In addition, the Contractor understands and agrees that the provisions of 31 U.S.C. § 3801 et seq., apply to this certification and disclosure, if any. In addition, the Contractor understands and agrees that the provisions of 11.062, Florida Statutes., apply to this certification and disclosure, if any. Signature of Contractor's Authorized Official Name of Authorized Official and Title Date RPS 18-7432-MP,<<30 of 31>> Solicitation 18-7432-MPCollier County 7/6/2020 10:08 AM p. 43 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.B GRANT CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES Exhibit 1.B – 9 COLLIER COUNTY Acknowledgement of Terms, Conditions, and Grant Clauses Flow Down of Terms and Conditions from the Grant Agreement Subcontracts: If the vendor subcontracts any of the work required under this Agreement, a cop y of the signed subcontract must be available to the Department for review and approval. The vendor agrees to include in the subcontract that (1) the subcontractor is bound by the terms of this Agreement, (ii) the subcontractor is bound by all applicable state and federal laws and regulations, and (iii) the subcontractor shall hold the Department and Recipient harmless against all claims of whatever nature arising out of the subcontractor’s performance of work under this Agreement, to the extent allowed and required by law. The recipient shall document in the quarterly report the sub contractor’s progress in performing its work under this agreement. For each subcontract, the Recipient shall provide a written statement to the Department as to whether the subcontractor is a minority vendor as defined in Section 288.703, Fla. Stat. Certification On behalf of my firm, I acknowledge, and agree to perform all of the specifications and grant requirements identified in this solicitation document(s). Vendor/Contractor Name ______________________________ Date __________________ Authorized Signature ___________________________________________________________ Address _____________________________________________________________________ Solicitation/Contract # ____________________________ RPS 18-7432-MP,<<31 of 31>> Solicitation 18-7432-MPCollier County 7/6/2020 10:08 AM p. 44 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) July 30, 2020 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) INSURANCE AND BONDING REQUIREMENTS Insurance / Bond Type Required Limits 1. Worker’s Compensation Statutory Limits of Florida Statutes, Chapter 440 and all Federal Government Statutory Limits and Requirements Evidence of Workers’ Compensation coverage or a Certificate of Exemption issued by the State of Florida is required. Entities that are formed as Sole Proprietorships shall not be required to provide a proof of exemption. An application for exemption can be obtained online at https://apps.fldfs.com/bocexempt/ 2. Employer’s Liability $__500,000_ single limit per occurrence 3. Commercial General Liability (Occurrence Form) patterned after the current ISO form Bodily Injury and Property Damage $__1,000,000____single limit per occurrence, $2,000,000 aggregate for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. 4. Indemnification To the maximum extent permitted by Florida law, the Contractor/Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Collier County, its officers and employees from any and all liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees and paralegals’ fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Contractor/ Vendor or anyone employed or utilized by the Contractor/Vendor in the performance of this Agreement. 5. Automobile Liability $_500,000__ Each Occurrence; Bodily Injury & Property Damage, Owned/Non-owned/Hired; Automobile Included 6. Other insurance as noted: Watercraft $ __________ Per Occurrence United States Longshoreman's and Harborworker's Act coverage shall be maintained where applicable to the completion of the work. $ __________ Per Occurrence Maritime Coverage (Jones Act) shall be maintained where applicable to the completion of the work. $ __________ Per Occurrence Aircraft Liability coverage shall be carried in limits of not less than $5,000,000 each occurrence if applicable to the completion of the Services under this Agreement. $ __________ Per Occurrence Pollution $ __________ Per Occurrence Professional Liability $ _1,000,000__ Per claim & in the aggregate Project Professional Liability $__________ Per Occurrence Valuable Papers Insurance $__________ Per Occurrence Cyber Liability $__________ Per Occurrence Technology Errors & Omissions $__________ Per Occurrence 7. Bid bond Shall be submitted with proposal response in the form of certified funds, cashiers’ check or an irrevocable letter of credit, a cash bond posted with the County Clerk, or proposal bond in a sum equal to 5% of the cost proposal. All checks shall be made payable to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on a bank or trust company located in the State of Florida and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 8. Performance and Payment Bonds For projects in excess of $200,000, bonds shall be submitted with the executed contract by Proposers receiving award, and written for 100% of the Contract award amount, the cost borne by the Proposer receiving an award. The Performance and Payment Bonds shall be underwritten by a surety authorized to do business in the State of Florida and otherwise acceptable to Owner; provided, however, the surety shall be rated as “A-“ or better as to general policy holders rating and Class V or higher rating as to financial size category and the amount required shall not exceed 5% of the reported policy holders’ surplus, all as reported in the most current Best Key Rating Guide, published by A.M. Best Company, Inc. of 75 Fulton Street, New York, New York 10038. 9. Vendor shall ensure that all subcontractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Vendor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. 10. Collier County must be named as "ADDITIONAL INSURED" on the Insurance Certificate for Commercial General Liability where required. This insurance shall be primary and non-contributory with respect to any other insurance maintained by, or available for the benefit of, the Additional Insured and the Vendor’s policy shall be endorsed accordingly. 11. The Certificate Holder shall be named as Collier County Board of County Commissioners, OR, Board of County Commissioners in Collier County, OR Collier County Government, OR Collier County. The Certificates of Insurance must state the Contract Number, or Project Number, or specific Project description, or must read: For any and all work performed on behalf of Collier County. 12. On all certificates, the Certificate Holder must read: Collier County Board of County Commissioners, 3295 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 13. Thirty (30) Days Cancellation Notice required. 14. Collier County shall procure and maintain Builders Risk Insurance on all construction projects where it is deemed necessary. Such coverage shall be endorsed to cover the interests of Collier County as well as the Contractor. Premiums shall be billed to the project and the Contractor shall not include Builders Risk premiums in its project proposal or project billings. All questions regarding Builder’s Risk Insurance will be addressed by the Collier County Risk Management Division. 7/6/20 - CC ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vendor’s Insurance Statement We understand the insurance requirements of these specifications and that the evidence of insurability may be required within five (5) days of the award of this solicitation. The insurance submitted must provide coverage for a minimum of six (6) months from the date of award. Name of Firm Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Date August 6, 2020 Vendor Signature _________________________________________________________________________ Print Name William D. Beddow, PE Insurance Agency Marsh Risk & Insurance Agent Name Jason L. Vogel Telephone Number FAX (212) 948-1306 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER F : INSURER E : INSURER D : INSURER C : INSURER B : INSURER A : NAIC # NAME: CONTACT (A/C, No): FAX E-MAIL ADDRESS: PRODUCER (A/C, No, Ext): PHONE INSURED REVISION NUMBER:CERTIFICATE NUMBER:COVERAGES IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. OTHER: (Per accident) (Ea accident) $ $ N / A SUBR WVD ADDL INSD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $ $ $ $PROPERTY DAMAGE BODILY INJURY (Per accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT AUTOS ONLY AUTOSAUTOS ONLY NON-OWNED SCHEDULEDOWNED ANY AUTO AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Y / N WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below If yes, describe under ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE $ $ $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT ER OTH- STATUTE PER LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EXP (MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EFF POLICY NUMBERTYPE OF INSURANCELTR INSR DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) EXCESS LIAB UMBRELLA LIAB $EACH OCCURRENCE $AGGREGATE $ OCCUR CLAIMS-MADE DED RETENTION $ $PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $GENERAL AGGREGATE $PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $MED EXP (Any one person) $EACH OCCURRENCE DAMAGE TO RENTED $PREMISES (Ea occurrence) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO- JECT LOC CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) CANCELLATION AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 (2016/03) © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. CERTIFICATE HOLDER The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD HIRED AUTOS ONLY 500,000 X N A ISA H25307306 A Naples, FL 34112 A 07/20/2020 Collier County Board of County Commissioners A DEFENSE INCLUDED AGGREGATE PER CLAIM/PER AGG 1,000,000 500,000 LIC #0437153 CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY 07/01/20 07/01/20 07/01/20 CIRTS_Support@jacobs.com Marsh Risk & Insurance Services 5,000 X 22667 X 07/01/21 1,000,000 1000 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2100 C/O Global Risk Management X 59833622 59833622 USA nyumdo_newgalexy 2,000,000 Los Angeles, CA 90071 ACE AMER INS CO X 1,000,000 07/01/21 Los Angeles, CA 90017 X "CLAIMS MADE" PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY 500,000 07/01/21 1-212-948-1306 07/01/21 07/01/21 07/01/21 A 1-212-948-1306 ONLY*. THE ACTUAL CERTIFICATE FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL COMPLY WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS NEGOTIATED IN THE FINAL Coverage is primary and certificate holder's insurance is excess and non-contributory. *THIS IS A SAMPLE CERTIFICATE negligence of the insured in the performance of insured's services to cert holder under contract for captioned work. Board of County Commissioners is added as an additional insured for general liability & auto liability as respects the NUMBER: 18-7432-MP. CONTRACT END DATE: 7/20/2025. SECTOR: Public. *$2,000,000 SIR FOR STATE OF: OHIO. Collier County provide engineering services on as needed basis for one 5-year term with a single 1-year renewal option. PROPOSAL PROJECT MGR: Bill Gramer. CONTRACT MGR: Jackie Finney. RE: Title: Metropolitan Planning Services. Proposal to 07/01/20HDO G71452694 500,000 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. X A 500,000 1,000,000 3295 Tamiami Trail East 07/01/20EON G21655065 011 07/01/20 633 W. Fifth Street X WLR C67460303 (AOS) SCF C67460388 (WI) WCU C67460340 (OHIO Only)* 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) SUPP (10/00) SUPPLEMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DATE NAME OF INSURED: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 07/20/2020 CONTRACT, CONSISTENT WITH POLICY TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Addendum 1 Date: July 7, 2020 From: Evelyn Colon, Procurement Strategist To: Interested Bidders Subject: Addendum # 1: 18-7432-MP-Metropolitan Planning The following change is made to the above-mentioned Collier County solicitation: • This Addendum is to add the insurance requirements: Please see the attached Insurance Requirements form. If you require additional information, please post a question on the Online Bidding site or contact me at the information noted above. Please sign below and return a copy of this Addendum with your submittal for the above referenced solicitation. (Signature) July 28, 2020 Date Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (Name of Firm) Email: Evelyn.Colon@colliercountyfl.gov Telephone: (239) 252-2667 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Addendum 2 Date: July 14, 2020 From: Evelyn Colon, Procurement Strategist To: Interested Bidders Subject: Addendum # 2: 18-7432-MP-Metropolitan Planning The following change is made to the above-mentioned Collier County solicitation: • This Addendum is to correct the bid due date: RPS OPENING DAY/DATE/TIME: AUGUST 6, 2019 AT 3:00PM AUGUST 6, 2020 AT 3:00PM If you require additional information, please post a question on the Online Bidding site or contact me at the information noted above. Please sign below and return a copy of this Addendum with your submittal for the above referenced solicitation. (Signature) July 28, 2020 Date Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (Name of Firm) Email: Evelyn.Colon@colliercountyfl.gov Telephone: (239) 252-2667 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Bill Gramer, PE, AICP | Project Manager | 5801 Pelican Bay Drive, Suite 505, Naples, FL 34108 | 239-860-4922 9.E.6 Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Jacobs Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 8/6/2020 Capital Consul�ng Solu�ons - DBE/MBE/SBE 9010 Strada Stell Ct, Suite 108 Naples, Florida 34109 PH: 239.273.8894 EM: adam.ahmad@capitalengr.com WS: capitalconsul�ngsolu�ons.com EVELYN COLON, PROCUREMENT STRATEGIST PROCUREMENT SERVICES DIVISION 3295 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, BLDG C-2 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 TELEPHONE: (239) 252-2667 EVELYN.COLON@COLLIERCOUNTYFL.GOV (EMAIL) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIBRARY METROPOLITAN PLANNING GENERAL PLANNING RPS NO.: 18-7432-MP VALUE QUALITY RESPONSIVE CAPITAL CONSULTING SOLUTIONS IS A CERTIFIED DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND A MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (MBE) WITH THE STATE OF FLORIDA PLANNING ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18- 8/5/2020 Evelyn Colon, Procurement Strategist Procurement Services Division 3295 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg C-2 Naples, Florida 34112 Re: Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category RPS NO.: 18-7432-RB Capital Consulting Solutions is pleased to submit our proposal to Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization for consideration of award to provide General Planning Services. Company and Professional Background: Capital Consulting Solutions (CCS) is a DBE/MBE/SBE firm with offices located in Naples. As a multi-disciplinary design and construction firm, we bring the planning, , project management, design, permitting, public involvement, construction management, and technical capabilities required to meet your overall project requirements, budget and schedule. Capital has local experience in project management, planning, engineering, construction, public involvement, and project administration. Capital offers a highly motivated team of professionals who are solution driven and are committed to making Collier County Metropolitan Planning projects their highest priority. Contract Point of Contact and Office Location: Mr. Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, CGC will be our primary point of contact. He can be reached at (239) 273-8894 and/or adam.ahmad@capitalengr.com. Our main office, located at 9010 Strada Stell Ct, Suite 108, Naples Florida, 34109, will be utilized for coordinating and delivering services under this contract. Our approach for services provided under this contract is focused on the following objectives: • Value – Capital provides highly qualified and well-trained staff who understands project requirements, local conditions and stakeholder concerns. Capital Project Manager, Adam Ahmad is currently providing Planning, Design and Construction Services for the Collier County Transit, Facilities, Parks and Recreation Utilities, Maintenance, MPO, Planning and Transportation Departments. • Quality – The team maintains formal QA/QC procedures to ensure a quality product every time! • Responsiveness – Our firms local Naples office and staffs’ proximity to Collier County offices will ensure that projects will be well coordinated, stakeholders will be kept informed and projects will adhere to schedule and budget constraints. Capital Contractors History with Collier County: Our firm has been successfully providing Design, Planning and Construction Services to Collier County. To date, our firm have provided services on over 100 purchase orders to Collier County. We also invite you to contact the References we have included in Tab 2 so they can elaborate on the responsiveness and quality service provided by Capital Consulting. 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Current Licenses and Certifications: Capital maintains all the required Licenses and Certifications required to perform work under this contract. • General Contractor: Florida CGC 1525246 • Professional Engineer: Florida 72472 • AICP No: 028767 • FDOT Advanced TTC Certification 28347 • General Contractor: South Carolina 109618 • General Contractor: North Carolina 58054 • General Contractor: Tennessee 52456 • DOT/FAA Airman Certificate UAS 3999943 Benefits of “Selecting” Capital Consulting Solutions LLC.: • Local office results in highly responsive services. • In-House Design, Planning and Construction Management staff complete understanding of Construction, Management, Permitting and Close-out requirements. • History of working with Collier County on a variety of Construction and Design Projects. • Formal QA/QC Process which monitors Project Schedule, Budget, and Performance. • Excellent working relationship with Collier County Project Managers. • Superb track-record of construction project bidding and performance. Thank you for your confidence and consideration of the Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC Team. We look forward to continuing our excellent working relationship with Collier County on this new contract. Sincerely, Adam Ahmad, P.E., AICP, GC Members of Capital Team at the Collier Building Industry Associate Meeting (CBIA) 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Community Impact Assessment Safety And Security Planning Preparation of Corridor StudiesTrac Modeling Trac Data Collection Services Access Management Studies Environmental Data Collection and AnalysisData Collection and Analysis Trac Operations Analysis Studies Preparation of Long Range Transportation Plan Preparation of Public Participation Plan Updates Freight PlanningRegional Planning including hosting regional summits Preparation of Annual Report Level of Service Analysis and Mapping Long Range Transportation Planning to include modeling assistanceMapping and Graphics Production Preparation of Powerpoint and Video Presentations Transit Planning Bicycle / Pedestrian Facilities Planning and Design including preparation of updates to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Congestion Management Analysis including Project Identication, Monitoring and Evaluation, Prepara -tion of Congestion Management Process Updates Transportation Safety Planning, Data Gathering and Analysis Support Sta at Public Meetings Public involvement assistance including website development, preparation of hard copy and electronic newsletters,, on-line surveys, interactive maps, informational videos and Public Service Announcements, and other educational and informational materials, as necessary Develop project information, including community impacts and input into the Ecient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) process Evaluate potential Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) applications Review of Project Development & Environ-ment studies Developing Project Cost Estimates Provide administrative support to the MPO Transportation Disad-vantaged Planning Project Management Oversight GIS services Reporting, analysis and planning related to Auto-mated, Connected, Autonomous Vehicles and Ride-Hailing Services Reporting, analysis, mapping and planning related to climate change, sea level rise, coastal resiliency, extreme weather phenomena and transportation infra-structure resiliency Analysis and reporting on socio-economic data and trends and travel behavior Origin/Destina-tion studies Reporting and compliance with Federal Performance measures, including project review, analysis, and monitoring TAB 1Ability of Professional Personnel PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIBRARYMETROPOLITAN PLANNING GENERAL PLANNING SERVICES CATEGORY RPS NO.: 18-7432-MP Capital Consul�ng Solu�ons - DBE/MBE/SBE 9010 Strada Stell Ct, Suite 108 Naples, Florida 34109 PH: 239.273.8894 EM: adam.ahmad@capitalengr.com WS: capitalconsul�ngsolu�ons.com PLANNING ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18- CAPABILITY STATEMENT FIRM OVERVIEW TRAFFIC/SAFETY STUDIES CONSTRUCTION / MOT VALUE, QUALITY & RESPONSIVE PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Certificate of Authorization: 32121 Dun & Bradstreet Number: 095637755 US Sys. of Award Management: 83XR0 Professional Engineer: Florida 72472 Cerfied Planner AICP No: 028767 General Contractor: Florida CGC 1525246 General Contractor: North Carolina 58054 General Contractor: South Carolina 109618 General Contractor: Tennessee 52456 DOT/FAA Airman Certificate UAS 3999943 FDOT Advanced TTC Certification 28347 FDOT PREQUALIFICATIONS Work Group 3. Highway Design Roadway: - 3.1 Minor Highway Design Work Group 6. Traffic Engineering & - 6.1 Traffic Engineering Studies - 6.2 Traffic Signal Timing - 6.3.1 Intelligent Trans Sys Analys. and Design - 7.1 Signing, Pavement Marking and Channel Work Group 13. Planning: - 13.4 Systems Planning - 13.5 Subarea/Corridor Planning - 13.6 Land Planning/Engineering Relevant Experience Comprehensive experience encompassing all phases of planning and design and production for civil/site work projects Experience in in a variety of planning, engineering, technical, analytical, statistical, graphical, public involvement, master planning, permitting, environmental and construction projects Skilled in civil engineering site and roadway design/mapping and surveying, computer information science, management, cartography, and graphic design Proficient in the use of state-of-the-art engineering software including Microstation and GEOPAK, ICPR, Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop, MathCAD, Sketchup, Leica HDS Cyclone and ESRI ArcGIS CORE COMPETENCIES PRIMARY CONTACT Capital Consulting Solutions (CCS) is a DBE/MBE/SBE firm local to the south Florida area. CCS has experience in local planning, engineering, construction, grant writing, public involvement, and project administration. CCS brings value providing permitting coordination, utility coordination relationships, local public knowledge (including context sensitive communites and HOA groups), and relationships with regulatory groups such as FDOT, USACOE, SFWMD, Collier County, Lee County, City of Bonita Springs and the City of Ft. Myers. CCS is prequalified with the FDOT in the following work groups: 3.1, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3.1, 7.1, 10.1,13.4, 13.5, and 13.6. Capital Consulting Solutions: Certified DBE/MBE, Planning, Engineering and Construction Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, CGC Professional Civil Engineer Licensed General Contractor Certified Planner PH: 239.273.8894 EM: adam.ahmad@capitalengr.com WS: capitalconsultingsolutions.com CONSTRUCTION ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( £¤41 ¬«865 ¬«31 ¬«739 ¬«45 ¬«867 ¬«78 ¬«82 ¬«80 §¨¦75 ")810")78A ")865A ")863 ")869 ")767 ")876 ")885 ")884 ")867A ")881 ")765 ")840 ")850 Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community 4 0 2.5 51.25 Miles Countywide Crash MapLee CountyCrashes 2012-2015Lee County Crash, 2012 - 2015Legend SeverityPED Rail Roads Other Roads County Road InterstateState Road US Road Lee County Boundary BIKE !(A_PED (112)!(K_PED (52)")K_BIC (14)")A_BIC (53)1 inch = 25,000 feet The Strand 5633 Strand Blvd, Suite 312 Naples, Florida 34110 Tampa, FL 33609 NAPLES OFFICE GRANT WRITING DRONE ANALYSISENGINEERING DESIGN TRAFFIC/SAFETY STUDIES PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT CapitalConsultingSolutions.Com CONSTRUCTION/ PERMITTING PLANNING/PD&E/ENVIRONMENTAL GIS STUDIES / ASSETS INSPECTION/ ADA COMPLIANCE 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Tab 1 - Ability of Professional Personnel Capital Consulting Solutions LLC (CCS) a disadvantaged (DBE), minority owned (MBE) business with strong roots in Collier County. Capital’s Principle Project Manager, Adam Ahmad, is not only a Professional Engineer, a Certified Planner, but also a General Contractor. Adam and his team at CCS have been designing and managing transportation projects like those included in this contract for over a decade in Collier County. CCS goal is to become the local, “go to” consultant for engineering, planning and general contracting services for the community where our founder and employees live. Team Member FDOT Certifications 3.1 Minor Highway Design 6.1 Traffic Engineering Studies 6.2 Traffic Signal Timing 6.3.1 Intelligent Transportation Systems 7.1 Signing, Pavement Marking and Channelization 10.1 Construction Engineering Inspection 13.4 Systems Planning 13.5 Subarea/Corridor Planning 13.6 Land Planning/ Engineering Capital Consulting Solutions LLC          Team Leaders Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, GC BS Civil Engineering – University of Kansas Adam will be the primary point of contact for the County and overall Project Manager for this LAP Design and Engineering project. Adam is well known to the County, having focused his career on providing services to the County and Southwest Florida clients. A licensed FL PE, AICP and GC, he brings to this contract comprehensive experience in all phases of planning, design and production for civil/sitework projects. He was substantially involved in a broad range of projects on numerous roadways in the County. The long history of collaborating on projects with his subconsultant team members will promote cohesion and enhance communication, resulting in a timely and cost-effective project completion. Ronald Leder Jr, PE. Civil Engineering, Roadway Design, Traffic, Drainage BS Civil Engineering – University of South Florida Ronald has more than 30 years of multi-discipline experience on a wide range of infrastructure improvement projects and is proficient in the latest design software packages. He has served as a Project Engineer of numerous roadways, sidewalk, utility relocation, multi -modal and drainage improvements projects. He worked on the Collier County Neptune Design, Rookery Bay Entrance Design and Collier County Wastewater Collections Site Development Plan. 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Fritznel Saint Louis Civil Engineering, Roadway Design, Construction BS Civil Engineering – Florida Gulf Coast University Fritznel is experienced in construction estimating and scheduling for infrastructure improvement projects. He generates detailed estimates, scope change estimates, procedures, conceptual estimates, process flow charts, in addition to cash flow and project status reports. Fritznel has experience with design software such AutoCAD, HEC-HMS, HEC- RAS and Microsoft Office applications. Richard St. Henry Project Manager/Construction Management Richard (Rick) has a diverse technical background as a construction manager in the office, and in the field. Rick has a keen understanding of what must be done to successfully plan, design and construct capital projects to best serve both the client and the public’s needs. Rick has worked on numerous projects throughout Southwest Florida. Cedric L. Koger Project Manager/Construction Management University of Kentucky CTQP Asphalt Roadway Level Cedric is experienced in project safety, project management, contract development, public involvement and program implementation. He has provided reviews for numerous construction plans, designs and specifications. His public involvement experience includes organizing meeting and effectively communicating project issues to affected stakeholders. June Lehmann Administration /Permitting BS Rutgers University June has more than 25 years of experience in private sector in the preparation, tracking and close out of federal, state and local permits for engineering, land development and legal firms. She has as strong background in contract administration – from bid and contract preparation, addendum issuance, contract awards through verification of pay requests, change orders and final project closeouts. Rayan Al-Hebshi, E.I Civil Engineering, Roadway Design, Construction BS Civil Engineering- Florida Gulf Coast University Rayan is an Engineer-in-Training (EI) familiar in aspects of land development, construction management and water resources design. Rayan is an advocate for sustainable practices with a focus on green city planning. Marmi Sica, E.I Civil Engineering BS Civil Engineering- Florida Gulf Coast University Marmi is an Engineer-in-Training familiar with project planning and water resources. He has experienced with software such as ArcGIS, AutoCAD, and Microsoft applications. Marmi is committed to working on projects that will benefit his community. 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) $, ķ" ! $!+!"$$ķ( !! "$$   !  !$ $ &" "" ! ""! &$ "$!&$ &"$!+ "! $   !$!$! ! " !$  & !$ !("" $ !ƓѶƖķ ! "$$&$ "  ķ  omo|-Ѵ|;u|_bv7o1†l;m|bm-m‹=oulĺ $$!$!"ķ  " & !ĹƐƔƑƔƒѶƕ *!$ $ Ĺ&&"$ƒƐķƑƏƑƏ $_bvbv‹o†uѴb1;mv;ĺ|bv†mѴ-‰=†Ѵ=ou-m‹om;o|_;u|_-m|_;Ѵb1;mv;;|o†v;|_bv7o1†l;m|ĺ ѶƑƑƔ&!  "(  " ƒƓƐƐƖ Ѵ‰-‹vˆ;ub=‹Ѵb1;mv;vomѴbm;-|‹ Ѵoub7-b1;mv;ĺ1ol Professional Engineer Cer�fied Planner General Contractor 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, CGC  Representative Project Experience  Type of Work 3.1: Minor Highway Design Project Manager, 2018 Immokalee Complete Streets TIGER Grant, Immokalee, Florida. 20 Miles of concrete sidewalks,1 miles of shared-uses paths, 20 miles of upgrades drainage/ditch and swales/ 32 intersection enhancing treatments at priority intersections, enhanced bus stop amenities/shelters including 22 bus shelters, 35 benches, and 25 bike racks construction of a Bus Transfer Station at the Collier County Health Department in Immokalee. Comprehensive lighting improvements including five miles of street lights and 106 lit intersections A five-mile neighborhood bike boulevard network with traffic calming and wayfinding intersections. Responsibilities include developing the TIGER Grant package and the preliminary design/cost package for the project. The grant was awarded $ 13 Million through Federal TIGER Funding Roadway Design Engineer; Vanderbilt Beach Road (Airport to Collier Boulevard Design); Collier County Florida Widening of 5.5 miles of the existing rural two-lane roadway to a six lane, urban divided roadway. Responsibilities included preparation of the design plans in Microstation/GEOPAK, utilities designs, drainage calculations (ICPR) and field calculations. Provided close coordinate with local agencies. Roadway Design Engineer; Oil Well Road (Immokalee Road to Camp Keais Road); Collier County, Florida. Widening and reconstruction of 11.1 miles of Oil Well Road from Immokalee Road to east of Camp Keais Road in eastern Collier County. The project scope included widening a two-lane rural section to a four lane and six lane urban section. The permitting effort included drainage and environmental impacts to environmentally sensitive areas. Responsibilities included preparation of the design plans in Microstation, public involvement meetings and field calculations. Participated in post design services throughout the project. Project Manager, Safe Routes to Schools Grant Eden Park Elementary, Immokalee, Florida. New sidewalk and compensatory drainage system in lieu of roadway drainage swales to provide an accessible route for students to attend Eden Park Elementary. Responsibilities for developing the Safe Routes to School Grant and roadway criteria package for the project. The grant was awarded $ 717, 071.33 through Safe Routes to School Funding under the requirements of the Local Agency Program (LAP) Developed conceptual roadway plans, typical sections location maps, existing condition map, student location map, proof of right of way, analyzed crash data and traffic data. Evaluated field conditions with representatives from FDOT and Collier County. Roadway Design Engineer; Tree Farm Road Phase II (Davila St. to Woodcrest Dr.) Design; Collier County, Florida. Design for the half-mile segment of Tree Farm Road. This 2-Lane roadway section links four (4) roadways with a new roundabout. The project consists of a new 2-lane new roadway with sidewalks, pathways, bike lanes and a new roundabout. The project included water main and force main design and permitting. The Prequalification  3.1, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3.1 , 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 13.4, 13.5, 13.6 CA License: 32121 DBE Cert NAICS: 541330, 54340, 541990, 431690, 238990 Relevant Experience   »14 years of comprehensive experience encompassing all phases of planning and design and production for civil/site work projects »Experience in in a variety of planning, engineering, technical, analytical, statistical, graphical, public involvement and project review activities »Skilled in civil engineering site and roadway design/mapping and surveying, computer information science, management, cartography, and graphic design »Proficient in the use of state-of-the-art engineering software including Microstation and GEOPAK, ICPR, Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop, MathCAD, Sketchup, Leica HDS Cyclone and ESRI ArcGIS. »Public Involvement, master planning, permitting, environmental, construction Education  B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Kansas Professional Registration  Professional Engineer: Florida 72472 AICP No: 028767 General Contractor: Florida CGC 1525246 General Contractor: North Carolina 58054 General Contractor: South Carolina 109618 General Contractor: Tennessee 52456 DOT/FAA Airman Certificate UAS 3999943 FDOT Advanced TTC Certification 28347 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP)     project utilized three (3) adjacent development ponds for stormwater treatment and attenuation. (Permits: SFWMD, ACOE FDEP) Responsibilities included preparation of the design plans in Microstation, public involvement meetings, permitting packages and field calculations. Roadway Design Engineer; Lee County Complete Streets Design Build Criteria Packages; Lee County, Florida. Design Criteria Packages efforts for the 11 planned projects listed in the Complete Streets Initiative TIGER Grant application. Project included the preparation of Conceptual Plans (horizontal layout on aerial photos) which delineated the intent of the proposed project(s), preparation of typical sections which defined project features such as sidewalks, pathways, bike lanes and shoulders; development of a Conceptual Report detailing the criteria used as the basis for the conceptual plans; preparation of a preliminary/conceptual design and construction schedule for evaluation by the Lee County MPO. Project included preparation of Conceptual Plans and typical sections which defined project features such as Coordinated NEPA permitting effort. Prepared bid package, hosted pre-bid meeting. Evaluated bids. Roadway Design Engineer; Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension; Collier County, Florida New 10 mile 6-Lane roadway from Collier Boulevard to Desoto Boulevard. Responsibilities included providing public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, maintenance of traffic, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Project placed “on-hold” at 60% Design. Roadway Design Engineer; Collier Boulevard (US 41 to Davis Boulevard) Design; Collier County, Florida. Design of roadway capacity improvements to a 7-mile segment from US 41 to Davis Boulevard. Responsibilities included preparation of design plans and specifications for widening the existing four-lane roadway to a six-lane facility, including four major intersections. Attended public involvement meetings and prepared permitting packages for SFWMD, ACOE and FDEP. Roadway Design Engineer; Collier Boulevard (Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road) Design; Collier County, Florida. Design of the Collier Boulevard (CR 951) project that involved widening 3 miles of the existing two- lane roadway to a six-lane, urban divided roadway from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. Responsibilities included public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, maintenance of traffic, structural design, environmental impacts, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical review, access management, and utility services. Attended public involvement meetings and prepared permitting packages for SFWMD, ACOE and FDEP. Roadway Design Engineer; Immokalee Road (CR 951 to 43rd Avenue NE); Collier County, Florida. Design of the widening of 8.1 miles of the existing two-lane roadway to a six-lanes. Responsibilities included aerial photography, attended public meetings and performed modeling and computer simulations. Attended public involvement meetings Roadway Design Engineer; Collier Boulevard Widening (Golden Gate Canal to Golden Gate Boulevard); Collier County, Florida. Design of the widening of 4 miles of the existing two-lane roadway to a six-lane, urban divided roadway. Created exhibits, attended public meetings, prepared Gantt chart schedules in Microsoft Project Design Manager, Billie Johns Street, Seminole Tribe of Florida, Big Cypress Reservation, Florida New construction of 0.75 miles of new 2 lane paved road, with each lane being 12 feet. Performed design reviews at the 30, 60, 90 and 100% levels of completion. Monitored permit applications for the purpose of compliance with design intent. Design Manager, Josie Billie Highway Segment 2, Seminole Tribe of Florida, Big Cypress Reservation, Florida This project consists of widening 9.6 miles of Josie Billie Highway from 10 feet per lane to 12 feet per lane. 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP)      The construction also includes paved shoulders and guardrails at the canal side of the road. Performed design reviews at the 30, 60, 90 and 100% levels of completion. Monitored permit applications for the purpose of compliance with design intent. Design Manager, Billie Road, Seminole Tribe of Florida, Big Cypress Reservation, Florida. New construction of 0.77 miles of new, paved 2 lane road extension. Each of the lanes will be 12 feet wide, with 6 feet wide sodded shoulders. Performed design reviews at the 30, 60, 90 and 100% levels of completion. Monitored permit applications for the purpose of compliance with design intent. Design Manager, Osprey Road, Seminole Tribe of Florida, Brighton Reservation, Florida. This project consists of the reconstruction of 0.3 miles of paved 2 lane road. Each of the lanes will be 6 feet wide, with 6 feet wide sodded shoulders. Performed design reviews at the 30, 60, 90 and 100% levels of completion. Monitored permit applications for the purpose of compliance with design intent. Roadway Design Engineer; Immokalee Road (CR 951 to 43rd Avenue NE); Collier County, Florida. Involved in the widening of 8.1 miles of the existing two-lane roadway to a six-lanes. Provided aerial photography, attended public meetings and performed modeling and computer simulations. Type of Work 6.1: Traffic Engineering Studies Traffic Engineer; Districtwide Traffic Operational Studies; FDOT District One. Responsible for conducting traffic operations studies such as signal warrant analysis, intersection delay study, left turn delay study, crash analysis, and spot speed studies. Performed standard travel time and delay studies along arterial roads using computerized hardware/software (JAMAR). Project Manager, STOF Reservation Wide Traffic Counts, Seminole Tribe of Florida, Tribalwide, Florida. Project to perform 72-Hour traffic counts of the entire Seminole Tribe of Florida roadway network. Counts performed on the Big Cypress, Brighton, Tampa, Fort Pierce, Hollywood and Immokalee Reservations. Responsible for evaluating the data and mapping the data in Geographic Information’s Systems (GIS) database. Project Manager, TIGER Grant Post Design Pedestrian Counts, Big Cypress Reservation, Florida. Pedestrian, atv and bicyclist counts of traffic along a TIGER Grant funded corridor to show the impacts roadway improvements post construction. Selected and purchased video count camera hardware and software. Setup count stations and performed data collection. From on the data collected, created reports to satisfy the TIGER grant reporting requirements. Project Manager, Seminole Tribe of Florida Road Safety Audit (RSA) Josie Billie Highway, Big Cypress, Florida. Assembled a multidisciplinary team to evaluate the performance the corridor. Responsible for conducting the start-up meeting, performing the field review, conducting analysis and preparing the report. Presented the finding to the FDOT safety officer. Project Manager, Miccosukee Tribe Road Safety Audit (RSA) Josie Billie Highway, Big Cypress, Florida. Engineering representative of a multidisciplinary team to evaluate the performance the corridor. Attended the start-up meeting and performed the field review. Provided observations of the findings to the Miccosukee representatives. Project Manager, Seminole Tribe of Florida Road Safety Audit (RSA) Reservation Road, Big Cypress, Florida. Provided safety audit of the Reservation road. Responsible for field review, conducting analysis and preparing the report. Coordinated with the Seminole Police Department and Public Works Department on concerns with speed. Posted speed was lower than the 85% percentile travel speed. 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP)     Traffic Engineer; District Wide Systems Planning; FDOT District One; Florida. Project to provide a wide range of services including project traffic reports, FSUTMS modeling, evaluations of facilities on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS), development of interchange justification\modification reports (IJRs\IMRs), and project report reviews. Responsibilities included updating transportation forecasting model validations for; review of transportation impact studies for growth management in rural counties; and developing the future year transportation plan updates. Traffic Engineer, Traffic Engineering Support Services; Collier County Transportation Planning Department; Collier County, Florida. Extension of County staff, performing reviews of Traffic Impact Reports and DRIs; development of design traffic for roadway widening projects; operational analysis and development of improvement alternatives; assistance with travel demand forecasting; Level of Service (LOS) Analysis; review of traffic operations and safety; developing guidelines for traffic impact studies; developing access management policies, training consultants and county staff; and providing general support for traffic engineering services. Traffic Engineer; Transportation Planning Continuing Services; Collier County Transportation Planning Department; Collier County, Florida. Services provided on an as needed basis to serve as an extension to the County staff including reviews of Traffic Impact Reports and DRIs, development of guidelines for traffic impact studies; training for the consultants and County staff; and general support for traffic engineering services as they relate to the overall development and growth in the County. Type of Work 6.2: Traffic Signal Timing Project Engineer; Collier Boulevard (US 41 to Davis Boulevard) Design; Collier County, Florida. Traffic signal design for this project which involved roadway capacity improvements to a 7-mile segment from US 41 to Davis Boulevard. Assisted in the design plans and specifications for widening the existing four-lane roadway to a six-lane facility, including four major intersections Project Engineer; Collier-Immokalee Intersection Improvements Design; Collier County, Florida. Design of intersection improvements to the Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard Intersection which will provide additional capacity to the intersection and extend Collier Blvd north approximately one-half mile. The Intersection improvements were planned and designed to accommodate a “future” SPUI at this intersection. Responsibilities include preparation of the design plans in Microstation, public involvement meetings, permitting packages for SFWMD, ACOE and FDEP. Participated in post design services throughout the project. Type of Work 6.3.1: Intelligent Transportation Systems Analysis and Design Project Manager, Adaptive Traffic Control System Engineering for CR 876, Lee County, Florida. Engineering design and analysis to upgrade a traffic responsive signal system along Daniels Parkway/Cypress Lake Drive from South Point Blvd to Gateway Blvd to utilize the latest technologies for Adaptive signal control. Review of the existing system documentation including regional ITS architecture, concept of operations, prior ITS studies and design documentation for the existing system. Prepared existing system inventory including a listing and evaluation of the existing equipment and system communication networks available to support an ASCT system. Provided stakeholder coordination. Conducted systems engineering analysis and prepared systems engineering documents. Type of Work 7.1: Signing, Pavement Marking, and Channelization. Design Manager, Josie Billie Highway Segment Emergency Signing Package, Seminole Tribe of Florida, Big Cypress Reservation, Florida. Design of roadway signing package along the Segment II (6.57 Miles) of Josie Billie Highway to improve safety. Responsibilities included preparation of the design plans per the MUTCD in 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP)      Microstation/GEOPAK. Plans package included key, general notes, MOT notes, project layout, typical, summary of guardrail, striping replacement detail and locations, tabulation of quantities, plans and guide sign worksheet. Project Manager, College Whiskey Intersection and Signalization Improvements, Lee County, Florida  Final design of the College Parkway westbound left turn lane to Edison Parkway (further south) to improve visibility for the opposing (eastbound College Parkway to Whiskey Creek) left turn movements, Providing “Mast Arm” signalization for the intersection and improving ADA accessibility at the corners. Responsible for the design of new cross bars and crosswalks required for new signal installation and the left turn lanes and median modifications required for offsetting the College Parkway left turn lane. Plans package included Key, Tabulation of Quanities, General Notes, and Signing and Marking Plans Sheets.   Type of Work 7.2: Lighting. Project Manager, Hollywood 64th Avenue Permanent Lighting, Florida. This project incorporates the installation of a permanent street lighting system that replaces the existing temporary solar lights installed between the Northern Gate and Charleston Street. Additionally, the project will include additional street lights from Charleston Street to the Southern Gate, which will double the number of street lights along the corridor. Performed design reviews at the 30, 60, 90 and 100% levels of completion. Monitored permit applications for compliance with design intent. Project Manager, IM Koowachobee Trail / Seminole Crossing Lighting, Florida. The Koowachobee Trail Lighting project includes the installation of a permanent street lighting system on both sides of Koowachobee Trail as an extension of the street lighting system installed by East-Alice Jimmie Project. The Seminole Crossing Trail Lighting project includes the installation of a street lighting system on both sides of Seminole Crossing Trail which will continue the street lights beyond Koowachobee Trail. Performed design reviews at the 30, 60, 90 and 100% levels of completion. Monitored permit applications for compliance with design intent. Type of Work 7.3: Signalization Project Manager, College Whiskey Intersection and Signalization Improvements, Lee County, Florida  Final design of the College Parkway westbound left turn lane to Edison Parkway (further south) to improve visibility for the opposing (eastbound College Parkway to Whiskey Creek) left turn movements, Providing “Mast Arm” signalization for the intersection and improving ADA accessibility at the corners. Responsible for the preparation of plans, details, specifications, quantities and cost estimates for the preferred traffic signal configuration at the College Parkway and Whiskey Creek Intersection. Plans included location of poles, mast arms, signal heads, controllers, video cameras, pedestrian pushbuttons and head locations, luminaries, street name signs and power service and appurtenances. Roadway Design Engineer; Collier-Immokalee Intersection Improvements Design; Collier County, Florida. Design of intersection improvements to the Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard Intersection which will provide additional capacity to the intersection and extend Collier Blvd north approximately one-half mile. The Intersection improvements were planned and designed to accommodate a “future” SPUI at this intersection. Responsibilities include preparation of the design plans including mast arms in Microstation, public involvement meetings, permitting packages for SFWMD, ACOE and FDEP. Participated in post design services throughout the project. Type of Work 10.1: Roadway CEI. 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP)     Project Manager, Stirling Road/ SR848 Off-Site Roadway Improvement; Hollywood, Florida. Construction of three turn lanes and incidental improvements located near the intersection of SR 848/Stirling Road and SW 58th Avenue. The turn lanes were constructed to accommodate anticipated traffic generated by a future development in the existing vacant parcel. Adam provided coordination with the Seminole Tribe of Florida, Designer, and Contractor: shop drawing review; contract compliance; contractor clarifications and request for information; contract modifications; contractors monthly pay applications; as-built/record drawings; project closeout. He conducted bi- weekly progress meeting, and other meetings as required to facilitate project. Project Manager, Stockade Road; Immokalee, Florida. Construction of drainage and sidewalk improvements to Stockade Road. Adam provided coordination with the Seminole Tribe of Florida, Designer, and Contractor: shop drawing review; contract compliance; contractor clarifications and request for information; contract modifications; contractors monthly pay applications; as-built/record drawings; project closeout. He conducted bi-weekly progress meeting, and other meetings as required to facilitate project. Coordination/management of CEI firm, process RFI's, RFQ's, Field Orders, Work Change Directives, change management, conduct progress meetings Project Manager, Bus Stop Improvements to Achieve ADA Compliance; Collier County, Florida Site modifications required to bring 33 bus stops located along the state highway system in Collier County up to ADA compliance. Conducted the pre-construction meeting. Provided contract document interpretation in addressing request for information, field visits, review of and assist in field changes. Type of Work 13.3: Policy Planning Project Manager, Collier County Master Mobility Plan Phase I; Collier County, Florida. The plan was developed to guide the need and location of land use, public services (libraries, EMS, schools, etc), multi-modal transportation and various infrastructures while protecting environmentally sensitive land and habitat. Adam facilitated authoring a grant that was awarded $500,000 through the American and Recovery Reinvestment Act. Upon receipt of the award, he developed metrics to report the success of the plan. He developed a Public Involvement Plan. It consisted of a series of public workshops that were held to gain local knowledge, and to build a consensus of build out expectations. The effort included conducting smaller group stakeholder meetings (charettes); compiling the results of these meetings to assess benefits and weaknesses; and preparing an overall draft MMP for use in future public workshops. He collected the information provided during the public workshops to develop land use and mobility objectives that was memorialized in a series of Memorandum of Understandings (MOU). He assisted in securing MOU’s that defined, validated and documented the commitments and expectations of Collier County Government and the primary stakeholders and agencies My coordination effort with MOU’s facilitated the MMP to move forward in partnership rather than in controversy. He was responsible for building databases and GIS maps of existing and proposed stakeholder plans (utility, parks, fire, protections overlays, etc.). Adam researched and pulled together geospatial databases from Collier County Growth Management Department, Facilities, Property Appraiser, Parks and Recreation, Information Technology and Utilities Department. Adam collected information from peripheral groups such South Florida Water Management District, Conservations Collier, Florida Geographic Data Library, and the Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). With the information collected he created base maps in geographic information system (GIS) maps and definite growth management objectives outlining and defining the needs of the plan. This information was presented to the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) for review and concurrence. The approval of CCPC and the BOCC advanced the process of creating Land Development Code (LDC) language as needed. Once the public and stakeholders provided input, Adam assisted in conducting and evaluation of the effects of the MPO plan on the transportation network. This 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP)      involved researching Collier County’s 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan and Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). A component he prepared on the MMP endorsed consolidating each of the county agencies (school, utilities, clerk of court, jail, etc.) long range transportation plans (such as the East of CR951 Horizon Study) into a unified planning document. Project Manager, Collier County Master Mobility Plan Phase II; Collier County, Florida. Adam was a project manager for Collier County’s Master Mobility Plan. (MMP) The plan was developed to guide the need and location of land use, public services (libraries, EMS, schools, etc), multi-modal transportation and various infrastructures while protecting environmentally sensitive land and habitat. He developed a plan to provide a comprehensive analysis to select projects, considering all significant impacts and options, including economic objectives (such as improving accessibility and reducing dependency on imported fuel), social objectives (improving accessibility for non-drivers, and encouraging public fitness and health) and environmental objectives (such as reducing pollution emissions and pavement area). He responded to future demands, taking into account changing demographics, economics and consumer preferences. Protected past investments by rehabilitating existing transportation infrastructure (sidewalks, paths, roads, bridges and transit systems) and redeveloping existing communities. Supported strategic land use objectives, such as creating more accessible, multi-modal communities. Reduced household transportation costs, particularly future energy consumption. Improved transportation options for mobility disadvantaged people. He facilitated in establishing and defining stakeholders to include all local, state, and federal agencies Lee and Hendry Counties, FDOT, DCA, Fish and Wildlife, Water Management Districts, etc.) along with affected Indian tribes, internal county departments and divisions, fire districts, and special interest groups (i.e., The Conservancy, Audubon Society, Economic Development Council, major land holders, etc.). I was part of the effort to notify stakeholders of the MMP effort; notify stakeholders of Visioning Plan effort; obtain commitment from stakeholders to participate; obtain documentation and public comments from prior efforts for the East of 951 Study and obtain current needs plans, preservation plans, protection areas, etc. from stakeholders. I participated in small group meetings with individuals or small groups of stakeholders document results of each group meeting. In the end a full day symposiums was held with all groups to consolidate and finalize MMP. The Collier County Planning Director required that substantial observed empirical data was required to substantiate the objectives of the MMP. He was responsible for conducting an economic analysis to determine the maximum social benefit. The evaluation determined the maximum benefit-cost to yield maximum reimbursement for regional communities from a monetary, pollutant reduction, energy savings and quality of life perspective. Adan recommended to increased public transit service because it is an effective economic stimulation strategy since it increases short-term employment, improves mobility for lower-income people (allowing unemployed people better options for accessing schooling and job opportunities), and increases economic productivity by reducing traffic congestion and parking costs. Adam encouraged improvements to efficient modes, including walking, cycling, ridesharing and public transit since it responds to future travel demands, allows households to reduce their transport costs, supports economic development by reducing energy demand and other transportation costs, improves mobility for non-drivers, and improves public fitness and health. He endorsed investments that support smart growth land use policies including building more affordable housing in accessible locations, urban infrastructure upgrades, improved public services (such as schools and medical clinics) in smart growth locations, and other forms of urban redevelopment. Design Manager, Seminole Tribe of Florida Systemic Safety Analysis, Big Cypress, Florida. The objective of this effort involved production of a prioritized list of highway facilities (segments, curves and intersections), identification of high priority candidate locations for safety investment and the development of safety projects (specific strategies at specific locations). The analysis that supports the prioritization exercise and safety project development 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP)     will be comprehensive and involve both site analysis of designated high crash locations and a systemic risk assessment of the entire road system. Responsible for assembling crash data, obtaining existing records, gis database and aerial photography. Conducted a data webinar to preview how the data wills support the technical analysis. Analyzed crash data, identified safety emphasis areas, high crash locations and systemic risk factors. Suggested safety projects at both high crash and systemic risk locations will be developed along with draft one-page summaries for each safety project. Type of Work 13.4: Systems Planning Design Manager, Long Range Transportation Plan, Seminole Tribe of Florida; Hollywood, Florida. He managed the 2035 Seminole Tribe of Florida Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The 20-year comprehensive study area included the boundary limits of the six Seminole Tribe reservations (primarily comprised of trust lands) within the state of Florida. A few services he managed were: An evaluation of a full range of transportation modes and connections between modes such as highway, rail, air, and water to meet transportation needs; Social and economic development planning to identify transportation improvements or needs to accommodate existing and proposed land use in a safe and economical fashion; Cultural preservation planning to identify important issues and develop a transportation plan that is sensitive to Tribal cultural preservation; Prioritized list of short and long-term transportation needs; An analysis of funding alternatives to implement plan recommendations. Design Manager, Seminole Tribe, Infrastructure Analysis Report, Tribal Wide, Florida Program to develop a reliable framework to financially optimize the planning, design, construction, operations and maintenance of their transportation infrastructure facilities. Responsible for creating a business process which will help the Seminole Tribe of Florida make informed decisions with regards to their resource allocation. Project Manager; Lee MPO Miscellaneous Planning Services; Lee County, Florida. Provided a variety of transportation planning and engineering services for the Lee County MPO under CH2M’S Lee County MPO General Services contract (2009-2015). To date the following services included: 1). Miscellaneous Planning Services: Validation of Project Feasibility and Development of Project Estimates. Preparation of conceptual designs along with quantity and cost estimates for roadway and corridor improvements. 2) Grant Preparation – Various TIGER I and TIGER III grant applications. Design Manager, Big Cypress Reservation Safety Plan, Big Cypress, Florida Big Cypress Reservation comprehensive safety plan that provides a framework for reducing highway fatalities and serious injuries. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), in partnership with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and representatives of Florida’s traffic safety community that addresses the “4 E’s” of safety – engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency response. Responsible for developing a prioritized list of safety improvements used justify safety request and identified public private and non-profit funding sources. Type of Work 13.5: Subarea/Corridor Planning Project Manager; Collier Community Streets and Infrastructure Project (CCSIP); Naples, Florida Planning project in North Naples to provide multi-use pathways, sidewalks, walkway amenities and enhance the connection to transit facilities. Planning study to improve the infrastructure of Vanderbilt Drive. Vanderbilt Drive is a north-south collector roadway that runs parallel to the west of US 41 (SR 45, Tamiami Trail N.) between Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862) and Bonita Beach Road (CR 865). The project completes a local street network and connect the community. This project includes total replacement of three bridges (Bridge No. 030177, Bridge No. 030178 on Vanderbilt Drive and Bridge No. 030149 on Bluebill Avenue), roadway reconstruction, and roadway safety 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP)      improvements. It includes, roadway, safety, multimodal, quality of life and environmental sustainability components. Assessed technical feasibility, financial feasibility and project schedule. Collaborated with many departments including Transportation Planning, Transportation Engineering, Road Maintenance, Parks and Recreation, Public Utilities, Construction Management, Stormwater Management and Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement to ensure successful completion of the project. Evaluated the long term outcomes that included the State of Good Repair, Economic Competitiveness, Livability, Sustainability and Safety. Project Manager; Growing Connections to Create Mobility Opportunities; Immokalee, Florida. Project designed to grow the existing pedestrian network by providing new facilities to accommodate transit, bicyclist and pedestrians where none currently exist. Applied complete streets concepts and incorporated Collier Area Transit (CAT) routes, bus shelters, proposed sidewalks and proposed lighting features. Collected data and completed a Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) that reflected public benefit by reducing the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), reducing frequency of crashes with bikes/pedestrians, increasing community health and resiliency, and supporting community reinvestment when compared to a baseline (no-build) scenario. Type of Work 13.6: Land Planning/Engineering, Project Manager, Collier County Master Mobility Plan Phase I; Collier County, Florida. The plan was developed to guide the need and location of land use, public services (libraries, EMS, schools, etc), multi-modal transportation and various infrastructures while protecting environmentally sensitive land and habitat. Responsibilities include assessing the impacts that proposed transportation improvements have on public/private property. Project Manager; Old US 41 Redevelopment Complete Streets Concepts; City of Bonita Springs, Florida. Conceptual roadway and storm water designs for Old US 41 from Bonita Beach Road to W. Terry Street. Responsibilities included the evaluation alternatives for roadway, bike lanes, pathways, sidewalks, access management and storm water improvements. The concepts included roundabout designs at Pennsylvania Ave and W. Terry Street. Design Engineer; Gordon River Water Quality Park; Collier County; Naples, Florida. Responsible quality control, planning, design, and development of a master wetland park plan and construction documents for an $8 million, 50-acre, passive wetland park including vehicular parking areas, three miles of boardwalk, park amenities, 3,000-square-foot education facility, upland and wetland planting plans, surface water irrigation plan, gopher tortoise relocation plan. Tasks included assisting the Project Manager with multiple public meetings and presentations throughout the planning process and preparation of presentation graphics in support or meetings. Type of Work 13.7: Transportation Statistics. Project Manager; Randall Boulevard Corridor Study Study to examine the feasibility of potential transportation impact of the most appropriate corridor for needed multi- lane improvements to Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road. To ascertain the Corridor's existing and future transportation demands, including traffic volumes, travel characteristics, and historical trends; facility operation (level of service), conditions of existing facilities and plans for improvements; describe what the existing or expected concerns are for the corridor and how the management plan expects to address these concerns. Prepared in accordance with the Florida Department of Transportation’s Project Development & Environmental Guidelines Manual (in Part 1, Chapter 8-2.1 and Part 2, Chapter 9 of the PD&E Manual), a written Public Involvement Plan outlining each element of the public involvement process. He establish an open process that is responsive to the concerns of the citizens and provides for timely involvement that influences the decision-making process. He 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP)     prepared Kick-off notification, mailing/contact list, identified public meeting site and collected public input. He attended meetings with local officials including EMS, Fire District, Parks and Rec, Public Utilities, Planning Department, MPO and local civic associations. Project Manager, Collier County Master Mobility Plan Phase I; Collier County, Florida. The plan was developed to guide the need and location of land use, public services (libraries, EMS, schools, etc), multi-modal transportation and various infrastructures while protecting environmentally sensitive land and habitat. Responsibilities include assessing the impacts that proposed transportation improvements have on public/private property. Project Manager; Growing Connections to Create Mobility Opportunities; Immokalee, Florida. Project designed to grow the existing pedestrian network by providing new facilities to accommodate transit, bicyclist and pedestrians where none currently exist. Applied complete streets concepts and incorporated Collier Area Transit (CAT) routes, bus shelters, proposed sidewalks and proposed lighting features. Collected data and completed a Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) that reflected public benefit by reducing the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), reducing frequency of crashes with bikes/pedestrians, increasing community health and resiliency, and supporting community reinvestment when compared to a baseline (no-build) scenario. 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Community Impact Assessment Safety And Security Planning Preparation of Corridor StudiesTrac Modeling Trac Data Collection Services Access Management Studies Environmental Data Collection and AnalysisData Collection and Analysis Trac Operations Analysis Studies Preparation of Long Range Transportation Plan Preparation of Public Participation Plan Updates Freight PlanningRegional Planning including hosting regional summits Preparation of Annual Report Level of Service Analysis and Mapping Long Range Transportation Planning to include modeling assistanceMapping and Graphics Production Preparation of Powerpoint and Video Presentations Transit Planning Bicycle / Pedestrian Facilities Planning and Design including preparation of updates to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Congestion Management Analysis including Project Identication, Monitoring and Evaluation, Prepara -tion of Congestion Management Process Updates Transportation Safety Planning, Data Gathering and Analysis Support Sta at Public Meetings Public involvement assistance including website development, preparation of hard copy and electronic newsletters,, on-line surveys, interactive maps, informational videos and Public Service Announcements, and other educational and informational materials, as necessary Develop project information, including community impacts and input into the Ecient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) process Evaluate potential Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) applications Review of Project Development & Environ-ment studies Developing Project Cost Estimates Provide administrative support to the MPO Transportation Disad-vantaged Planning Project Management Oversight GIS services Reporting, analysis and planning related to Auto-mated, Connected, Autonomous Vehicles and Ride-Hailing Services Reporting, analysis, mapping and planning related to climate change, sea level rise, coastal resiliency, extreme weather phenomena and transportation infra-structure resiliency Analysis and reporting on socio-economic data and trends and travel behavior Origin/Destina-tion studies Reporting and compliance with Federal Performance measures, including project review, analysis, and monitoring TAB 2Past Performance PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIBRARYMETROPOLITAN PLANNING GENERAL PLANNING SERVICES CATEGORY RPS NO.: 18-7432-MP Capital Consul�ng Solu�ons - DBE/MBE/SBE 9010 Strada Stell Ct, Suite 108 Naples, Florida 34109 PH: 239.273.8894 EM: adam.ahmad@capitalengr.com WS: capitalconsul�ngsolu�ons.com PLANNING ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18- Developed GIS inventory of existing regulatory signs on the Big Cypress and Brighton Reservation. Assembled bid packages and performed inspections to replace all the signs on each reservation. Planned the replacement and upgrade of over 500 signs. • Developed Routine Maintenance Schedule • Conducting Site Survey – ArcMap Collector • Following MUTCD Latest Edition Specifications and FDOT Standard Review to measure the progress of the “Action Items” identified in the Lee County Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Action Plan (BPSAP). The BPSAP was adopted in 2013 by the Lee County Metropolitan Organization (LMPO) with support from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 1 and local stakeholders. The objective of the BPSAP is to reduce the fatal and severe bicycle and pedestrian crashes through specific “Goals, Objectives and Action Items”. The review is part of the BPSAP objective # 4; Accountability, to monitor the progress in reducing the frequency and severity of bicycle and pedestrian crashes using the vision and goal to guide policy and program decisions. The work involved assisting the Collier staff in developing and evaluating various bus shelter alternatives to improve the existing bus shelters with regards to passenger comfort and convenience (standing areas, seating, protection from sun and rain, information, etc.) Services provided included preparation of a Bus Shelter Alternatives Technical Memorandum, Bus Shelter Amenities Survey Questionnaire, TAC coordination meetings, bus shelter designs, bus shelter pad designs. Seminole Tribe of Florida – GIS Sign Inventory and Replacement Lee MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Plan Action Plan Review CC 19-7490 Design Build for Collier Bus Shelters 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) On Team Responsible for award winning grant that will fund 20 Miles of concrete sidewalks,1 miles of shared-uses paths, 20 miles of upgrades drainage/ditch and swales/ 32 intersection enhancing treatments at priority intersections, enhanced bus stop amenities/shelters including 22 bus shelters, 35 benches, and 25 bike racks construction of a Bus Transfer Station at the Collier County Health Department in Immokalee.. Responsibilities include developing the TIGER Grant package and the preliminary design/cost package for the project. The grant was awarded $ 13 Million through Federal TIGER Funding Design Criteria Professional to perform those services as necessary for the preparation of public procurement documents necessary which may include the preparation and sealing of a design criteria package for the Project, serving as the District’s representative throughout the request for qualifications for Project design build services and Project design and construction, as well as attendance at meetings of the District’s Governing Board as requested by the District. This report provides a background of the study area and outlines the vision and goals for one of Lee County’s most important roadways of the future. As population growth spreads eastward from coastal areas, this corridor and the control of key access points will be central to successful planning efforts to maintain quality of life while facilitating growth. Analysis of existing and future traffic conditions for accessibility and safety considerations follow in the information provided. It reviews Access Management, Traffic Analysis, Alternative Intersection Analysis, Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAV), Complete Street Evaluation 2018 Immokalee Complete Streets TIGER Grant Babcock Ranch SR 31 Design Criteria Package Lee County Corkscrew Road Integrated Corridor Management Plan 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Responsible for the Planning, Design and Services during construction of the corridor. The project was approximately 6 miles in length and included safety improvements along Josie Billie Highway from Rock Pit to Rodeo Arena and will provide for a safer facility that currently serves as the primary access to the community area of the Big Cypress Reservation. Safety plan that aligns with Florida’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) goal of providing a safer surface transportation system for residents, businesses, and visitors. The safety plan demonstrated to the general public, tribal community and policy makers, as well as local, state and federal agencies, that specific efforts are being undertaken to increase safety within the reservation boundaries. The project help build and establish trust among all stake holders Responsible for the Planning, Design and Construction of corridor. The existing road is approximately 20 to 30 feet and existing surface is gravel. The purpose of the project is to provide a 22- foot urban two lane paved road with improved drainage and safety. The project will start at Micco Drive and end at Farmer Road. Improvements will include a new pavement section with improved shoulders, improved drainage, signage as needed and markings. Key design considerations are design speed, typical section, drainage, safety features, pavement section, signing, and markings for the appropriate roadway functional classification. Seminole Tribe of Florida – Josie Billie Highway Transportation Strategic Transportation Safety Plan Big Cypress Wind Clan Road and Farmers Road 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Responsible for the planning and criteria for West Boundary Road in Big Cypress is in poor shape and needs to be repaved. This project involves the reconstruction of 4 miles of road . Responsible for the planning of corridor. There is a 1.29-mile long that involves improvements to George Billie Road and Frank Shore Road including paving currently unpaved sections, drainage improvements, align and overlay existing paved sections, signage and marking. To reduce construction impact and achieve cost ssavings, these road improvements have been coordinated with utility needs and a water main replacement. The goal of this review is to measure the progress of the “Action Items” identified in the Lee County Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Action Plan (BPSAP). The BPSAP was adopted in 2013 by the Lee County Metropolitan Organization (LMPO) with support from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 1 and local stakeholders. The objective of the BPSAP is to reduce the fatal and Big Cypress West Boundary Road Brighton Billie Road Extension Florida Turnpike Billboard Planning 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) This 2035 Seminole Tribe of Florida Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) is a 20-year comprehensive plan developed and updated by the Seminole Tribe of Florida (Seminole Tribe or Tribe) every 5 years (updated in 2010 and 2015). The study area includes the boundary limits of the six Seminole Tribe reservations (primarily comprised of trust lands) within the state of Florida. Plan based on Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) to reduce the number of fatalities and serious injuries that are the result of motor vehicle crashes occurring along their road system – almost 200 miles of rural and urban roads that extend across 5 individual parts of their expansive reservation The plan includes: • Identification of safety emphasis areas • Systemwide systemic (risk based) and high crash analyses • Evaluation of potential safety countermeasures • Prioritization of STOF facilities and identification of candidates for safety investment The main objective of this study is to address the safe operation of the roadway and ensure a high level of safety for all users. The Road Safety Audit (RSA) has been conducted to identify safety issues and provide improvement recommendations and countermeasures for those segments of the subject roadway with a history of or the potential for high incidence of vehicular crashes. Seminole Tribe of Florida Long Range Transportation Plan Tribal-Wide Systemic Safety Analysis Report Josie Billie Highway Road Safety Audit 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) CAPITAL TEAM Past Performance TIGER GRANT - IMMOKALEE COMPLETE STREETS Project Type: Conceptual Design / GIS / Grant Writing Project Owner: Collier County Planning Project Description: Project Manager, 2018 Immokalee Complete Streets TIGER Grant, Awarded $13 Million. 20 Miles of concrete sidewalks,1 miles of shared-uses paths, 20 miles of upgrades drainage/ditch and swales/ 32 intersection enhancing treatments at priority intersections, enhanced bus stop amenities/shelters including 22 bus shelters, 35 benches, and 25 bike racks construction of a Bus Transfer Station at the Collier County Health Department in Immokalee. Schedule Gannt Chart MS Project Grant Writing/FundedCounty Right of Way Evaluation Computer Aided Design (CADD) Transportation Engineering TIGER Grant Awarded $13 Million 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) CAPITAL TEAM Past Performance Safe Routes To School Grants & Roadway Safety Audit Project Type: Conceptual Design / GIS / Grant Writing Project Owner: Collier County Planning Project Description: Project Manager, Safe Routes to Schools Grant. Eden Park and Shadowlawn grant support. New sidewalk and compensatory drainage system in lieu of roadway drainage swales to provide an accessible route for students to attend Eden Park Elementary. Responsibilities for developing the Safe Routes to School Grant and roadway criteria package for the project. The grant was awarded $ 717, 071.33 through Safe Routes to School Funding under the requirements of the Local Agency Program (LAP) Developed conceptual roadway plans, typical sections location maps, existing condition map. Schedule Gannt Chart MS Project Grant Writing/FundedCounty Right of Way Evaluation Computer Aided Design (CADD) Transportation Engineering 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) CAPITAL TEAM Past Performance 5.8 Mile Design - Josie Billie Highway Segment 2 - Engineer of Record Project Type: Design / CEI / Construction Management Project Owner: Seminole Tribe of Florida Project Description: Reconstruction of 5.8 Miles of Josie Billie Highway Segment 2 Milling, Resurfacing and Shoulder Reconstruction project will add improvements along Josie Billie Highway to mitigate design deciencies and improve safety. Major components required were mobilization, maintenance of trac (MOT), clearing, earthwork, milling, resurfacing, shoulder reconstruction, installation of guardrail, and signing and marking.. Schedule Gannt Chart MS Project Grant Writing/Funded Federal Right of Way Process Computer Aided Design (CADD) Transportation Engineering Construction Construction Engineering Inspection ADAM AHMAD, PEIS THE ENGINEER OF RECORDFOR THE 5.8 MILE RECONSTRUCTION DESIGN 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) CAPITAL TEAM Past Performance Rookery Bay Parking Lot Entrance Drainage Repair (DESIGN BUILD) Project Type: Design/Build Project Owner: Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Project Description: Design / Build Entrance Reconstruction To Repair Drainage Issues. Provided Design, Survey, Labor, Materials, Equipment, Supervision And Permitting To Successfully Address The Entrance Drainage Problem. Schedule Gannt Chart MS Project Computer Aided Design (CADD) Transportation Engineering Structural Foundation Design Right of Way Permit Collier County Building Permit Collier County Construction Construction Engineering Inspection 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) CAPITAL TEAM Past Performance BUS SHELTER DESIGN AT WILSON BLVD AND GOLDEN GATE BLVD Project Type: Design/Build Project Owner: Collier County Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement Division Project Description: Wilson Blvd Transit Shelter Planning, Survey, Design, Permitting And Construction Support Services Schedule Gannt Chart MS Project Computer Aided Design (CADD) Transportation Engineering Structural Foundation Design Right of Way Permit Collier County Building Permit Collier County Construction Construction Engineering Inspection 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: RPS NO.: 18-7432-MP METROPOLITAN PLANNING GENERAL PLANNING Reference Questionnaire for: Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) ADAM AHMAD (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name:Emran Rahaman (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company:SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: EmranRahaman@SEMTRIBE.COM FAX: Telephone: 954-894-1060 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: STOF Tribalwide Systemic Safety Analysis Completion Date: May 2017 Project Budget: $125,000 Project Number of Days: 180 Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: RPS NO.: 18-7432-MP METROPOLITAN PLANNING GENERAL PLANNING Reference Questionnaire for: CAPITAL CONSULTING SOLUTIONS, LLC (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) ADAM AHMAD (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name:FABIAN LEFLER (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company:SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: FABIANLEFLER@SEMTRIBE.COM FAX: Telephone: 954-894-1060 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: Transportation Design Manager Completion Date: Ongoing Project Budget: Ongoing Project Number of Days: 180 Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: RPS NO.: 18-7432-MP METROPOLITAN PLANNING GENERAL PLANNING Reference Questionnaire for: CAPITAL CONSULTING SOLUTIONS, LLC (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) ADAM AHMAD (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name:Bill Gramer, PE (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company:JACOBS Engineering (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: Bill.Gramer@JACOBS.com FAX: Telephone: 239-860-4922 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: Bus Stop Design Improvements to Achieve ADA Compliance Completion Date: 2018 Project Budget: 85k Project Number of Days: 180 Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Community Impact Assessment Safety And Security Planning Preparation of Corridor StudiesTrac Modeling Trac Data Collection Services Access Management Studies Environmental Data Collection and AnalysisData Collection and Analysis Trac Operations Analysis Studies Preparation of Long Range Transportation Plan Preparation of Public Participation Plan Updates Freight PlanningRegional Planning including hosting regional summits Preparation of Annual Report Level of Service Analysis and Mapping Long Range Transportation Planning to include modeling assistanceMapping and Graphics Production Preparation of Powerpoint and Video Presentations Transit Planning Bicycle / Pedestrian Facilities Planning and Design including preparation of updates to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Congestion Management Analysis including Project Identication, Monitoring and Evaluation, Prepara -tion of Congestion Management Process Updates Transportation Safety Planning, Data Gathering and Analysis Support Sta at Public Meetings Public involvement assistance including website development, preparation of hard copy and electronic newsletters,, on-line surveys, interactive maps, informational videos and Public Service Announcements, and other educational and informational materials, as necessary Develop project information, including community impacts and input into the Ecient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) process Evaluate potential Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) applications Review of Project Development & Environ-ment studies Developing Project Cost Estimates Provide administrative support to the MPO Transportation Disad-vantaged Planning Project Management Oversight GIS services Reporting, analysis and planning related to Auto-mated, Connected, Autonomous Vehicles and Ride-Hailing Services Reporting, analysis, mapping and planning related to climate change, sea level rise, coastal resiliency, extreme weather phenomena and transportation infra-structure resiliency Analysis and reporting on socio-economic data and trends and travel behavior Origin/Destina-tion studies Reporting and compliance with Federal Performance measures, including project review, analysis, and monitoring TAB 3Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIBRARYMETROPOLITAN PLANNING GENERAL PLANNING SERVICES CATEGORY RPS NO.: 18-7432-MP Capital Consul�ng Solu�ons - DBE/MBE/SBE 9010 Strada Stell Ct, Suite 108 Naples, Florida 34109 PH: 239.273.8894 EM: adam.ahmad@capitalengr.com WS: capitalconsul�ngsolu�ons.com PLANNING ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18- EVALUATION CRITERIA NO. 3: RECENT, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WORKLOADS OF THE FIRM Capital Consulting Solutions will have staff ready to perform all required services for this contract when needed. We understand that the timely completion of these projects is critical, and we are committed to making our team available to deliver on time and within budget. Our team has extensive experience with working in Collier County and we are committed to value, quality and responsiveness CCS team members were selected based on their reputations for excellence on similar projects, their past working relationships with both the County and our other team members, their willingness to be committed to this project and their availability to ramp up immediately upon notice to proceed. The graph below shows our team members’ availability to implement this contract. January February March April May June July August Septemb er October Novemb er Decembe r Workload 65.00%65.00%55.00%50.00%45.00%45.00%40.00%35.00%35.00%35.00%35.00%35.00% 65.00%65.00% 55.00%50.00%45.00%45.00%40.00%35.00%35.00%35.00%35.00%35.00% 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% WORKLOAD 0 20 40 60 80 Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP Ronald Leder, PE Fritznel Saint Louis Rayan Al-Hebshi, EI Marmi Sica, EI June Lehmann Key Team Member Availability Available Committed 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) As you can see from the above exhibit, CCS has the resources available to deliver the required services over the duration of this contract. Our firm is growing, and our staffing numbers will only be increasing in the future, providing even more capabilities. Helping the MPO succeed in their efforts is our goal. Almost all team members are local Collier County residents, and as such, take pride in our community. Our long-term relationship with Collier County is the most important factor considered in our execution of this project. Our team has the depth of staff needed to begin work immediately on this contract. The table shown on the previous page describes the time available to support this contract. While pursuing and scheduling future work our team evaluates our current workload and will not pursue or accept any work which will interfere with our committed assignments. 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Community Impact Assessment Safety And Security Planning Preparation of Corridor StudiesTrac Modeling Trac Data Collection Services Access Management Studies Environmental Data Collection and AnalysisData Collection and Analysis Trac Operations Analysis Studies Preparation of Long Range Transportation Plan Preparation of Public Participation Plan Updates Freight PlanningRegional Planning including hosting regional summits Preparation of Annual Report Level of Service Analysis and Mapping Long Range Transportation Planning to include modeling assistanceMapping and Graphics Production Preparation of Powerpoint and Video Presentations Transit Planning Bicycle / Pedestrian Facilities Planning and Design including preparation of updates to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Congestion Management Analysis including Project Identication, Monitoring and Evaluation, Prepara -tion of Congestion Management Process Updates Transportation Safety Planning, Data Gathering and Analysis Support Sta at Public Meetings Public involvement assistance including website development, preparation of hard copy and electronic newsletters,, on-line surveys, interactive maps, informational videos and Public Service Announcements, and other educational and informational materials, as necessary Develop project information, including community impacts and input into the Ecient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) process Evaluate potential Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) applications Review of Project Development & Environ-ment studies Developing Project Cost Estimates Provide administrative support to the MPO Transportation Disad-vantaged Planning Project Management Oversight GIS services Reporting, analysis and planning related to Auto-mated, Connected, Autonomous Vehicles and Ride-Hailing Services Reporting, analysis, mapping and planning related to climate change, sea level rise, coastal resiliency, extreme weather phenomena and transportation infra-structure resiliency Analysis and reporting on socio-economic data and trends and travel behavior Origin/Destina-tion studies Reporting and compliance with Federal Performance measures, including project review, analysis, and monitoring TAB 4Appendix - Required Forms PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIBRARYMETROPOLITAN PLANNING GENERAL PLANNING SERVICES CATEGORY RPS NO.: 18-7432-MP Capital Consul�ng Solu�ons - DBE/MBE/SBE 9010 Strada Stell Ct, Suite 108 Naples, Florida 34109 PH: 239.273.8894 EM: adam.ahmad@capitalengr.com WS: capitalconsul�ngsolu�ons.com PLANNING ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18- ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Vendor Check List IMPORTANT: Please review carefully and submit with your Proposal/Bid. All applicable documents shall be submitted electronically through BidSync. Vendor should checkoff each of the following items: General Bid Instructions has been acknowledged and accepted. Collier County Purchase Order Terms and Conditions have been acknowledged and accepted. Form 1: Vendor Declaration Statement Form 2: Conflict of Interest Certification Proof of status from Division of Corporations - Florida Department of State (If work performed in the State) - http://dos.myflorida.com/sunbiz/ should be attached with your submittal. Vendor MUST be enrolled in the E-Verify - https://www.e-verify.gov/ at the time of submission of the proposal/bid. Form 3: Immigration Affidavit Certification MUST be signed and attached with your submittal or you MAY be DEEMED NON-RESPONSIVE E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding or Company Profile page should be attached with your submittal. Form 4: Certification for Claiming Status as a Local Business, if applicable, has been executed and returned. Collier or Lee County Business Tax Receipt should be attached with your submittal to be considered. Form 5: Reference Questionnaires form must be utilized for each requested reference and included with your submittal, id applicable to the solicitation. Form 6: Grant Provisions and Assurances package in its entirety, if applicable, are executed and should be included with your submittal. All forms must be executed, or you MAY be DEEMED NON-RESPONSIVE. Vendor W-9 Form. Vendor acknowledges Insurance Requirements and is prepared to produce the required insurance certificate(s) within five (5) days of the County’s issuance of a Notice of Recommend Award. The Bid Schedule has been completed and attached with your submittal, applicable to bids. Copies of all requested licenses and/or certifications to complete the requirements of the project. All addenda have been signed and attached, or you MAY be DEEMED NON-RESPONSIVE. County’s IT Technical Architecture Requirements has been acknowledged and accepted, if applicable. Any and all supplemental requirements and terms has been acknowledged and accepted, if applicable. 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Form 1: Vendor Declaration Statement BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners: The undersigned, as Vendor declares that this response is made without connection or arrangement with any other person and this proposal is in every respect fair and made in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The Vendor hereby declares the instructions, purchase order terms and conditions, requirements, and specifications/scope of work of this solicitation have been fully examined and accepted. The Vendor agrees, if this solicitation submittal is accepted by Collier County, to accept a Purchase Order as a form of a formal contract or to execute a Collier County formal contract for purposes of establishing a contractual relationship between the Vendor and Collier County, for the performance of all requirements to which this solicitation pertains. The Vendor states that the submitted is based upon the documents listed by the above referenced solicitation. The Vendor agrees to comply with the requirements in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications denoted herein and according to the pricing submitted as a part of the Vendor’s bids. Further, the Vendor agrees that if awarded a contract for these goods and/or services, the Vendor will not be eligible to compete, submit a proposal, be awarded, or perform as a sub-vendor for any future associated work that is a result of this awarded contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this _____ day of _____________, 20__ in the County of _______________, in the State of _____________. Firm’s Legal Name: Address: City, State, Zip Code: Florida Certificate of Authority Document Number Federal Tax Identification Number *CCR # or CAGE Code *Only if Grant Funded __________________________________________________________________________ Telephone: Email: Signature by: (Typed and written) Title: 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Additional Contact Information Send payments to: (required if different from above) Company name used as payee Contact name: Title: Address: City, State, ZIP Telephone: Email: Office servicing Collier County to place orders (required if different from above) Contact name: Title: Address: City, State, ZIP Telephone: Email: Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, GC Owner 9010 Strada Stell Ct, Suite 108 Naples, Florida 34109 239.273.8894 adam.ahmad@capitalengr.com Adam Ahmad Owner 9010 Strada Stell Ct, Suite 108 Naples, Florida 34109 239.273.8894 adam.ahmad@capitalengr.com 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Form 4: Vendor Submittal – Local Vendor Preference Certification (Check Appropriate Boxes Below) State of Florida (Select County if Vendor is described as a Local Business) Collier County Lee County Vendor affirms that it is a local business as defined by the Procurement Ordinance of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the Regulations Thereto. As defined in Section Fifteen of the Collier County Procurement Ordinance: Local business means the vendor has a current Business Tax Receipt issued by the Collier County Tax Collector prior to bid or proposal submission to do business within Collier County, and that identifies the business with a permanent physical business address located within the limits of Collier County from which the vendor’s staff operates and performs business in an area zoned for the conduct of such business. A Post Office Box or a facility that receives mail, or a non-permanent structure such as a construction trailer, storage shed, or other non-permanent structure shall not be used for the purpose of establishing said physical address. In addition to the foregoing, a vendor shall not be considered a "local business" unless it contributes to the economic development and well-being of Collier County in a verifiable and measurable way. This may include, but not be limited to, the retention and expansion of employment opportunities, support and increase to the County's tax base, and residency of employees and principals of the business within Collier County. Vendors shall affirm in writing their compliance with the foregoing at the time of submitting their bid or proposal to be eligible for consideration as a "local business" under this section. A vendor who misrepresents the Local Preference status of its firm in a proposal or bid submitted to the County will lose the privilege to claim Local Preference status for a period of up to one year under this section. Vendor must complete the following information: Year Business Established in Collier County or Lee County: ________ Number of Employees (Including Owner(s) or Corporate Officers):_________ Number of Employees Living in Collier County or Lee (Including Owner(s) or Corporate Officers):_______ If requested by the County, Vendor will be required to provide documentation substantiating the information given in this certification. Failure to do so will result in vendor’s submission being deemed not applicable. Sign and Date Certification: Under penalties of perjury, I certify that the information shown on this form is correct to my knowledge. Company Name: _________________________________________ Date: _____________________________ Address in Collier or Lee County: _____________________________________________________________________ Signature: ____________________________________________ Title: _____________________________ 2017 10 10 Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC 8/6/2020 9010 Strada Stell Ct, Suite 108, Naples, Florida 34109 Owner 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** FORM 6 IF APPLICABLE GRANT PROVISIONS AND ASSURANCES FORMS ARE PROVIDED IN SEPARATE PACKAGE AND MUST BE COMPLETED AND EXECUTED IN ITS ENTIRTY AND RETURNED WITH THE SUBMISSION OF THE BID/PROPOSAL. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY DEEM YOU NON- RESPONSIVE. 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** CONFIRM ALL REQUIRED LICENSES AND FORMS ARE COMPLETED AND EXECUTED IN ITS ENTIRTY AND RETURNED WITH THE SUBMISSION OF THE BID/PROPOSAL. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY DEEM YOU NON- RESPONSIVE. 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) $, ķ" ! $!+!"$$ķ( !! "$$   !  !$ $ &" "" ! ""! &$ "$!&$ &"$!+ "! $   !$!$! ! " !$  & !$ !("" $ !ƓѶƖķ ! "$$&$ "  ķ  omo|-Ѵ|;u|_bv7o1†l;m|bm-m‹=oulĺ $$!$!"ķ  " & !ĹƐƔƑƔƒѶƕ *!$ $ Ĺ&&"$ƒƐķƑƏƑƏ $_bvbv‹o†uѴb1;mv;ĺ|bv†mѴ-‰=†Ѵ=ou-m‹om;o|_;u|_-m|_;Ѵb1;mv;;|o†v;|_bv7o1†l;m|ĺ ѶƑƑƔ&!  "(  " ƒƓƐƐƖ Ѵ‰-‹vˆ;ub=‹Ѵb1;mv;vomѴbm;-|‹ Ѵoub7-b1;mv;ĺ1ol Professional Engineer Cer�fied Planner General Contractor 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Addendum 1 Date: July 7, 2020 From: Evelyn Colon, Procurement Strategist To: Interested Bidders Subject: Addendum # 1: 18-7432-MP-Metropolitan Planning The following change is made to the above-mentioned Collier County solicitation: • This Addendum is to add the insurance requirements: Please see the attached Insurance Requirements form. If you require additional information, please post a question on the Online Bidding site or contact me at the information noted above. Please sign below and return a copy of this Addendum with your submittal for the above referenced solicitation. (Signature) Date (Name of Firm) Email: Evelyn.Colon@colliercountyfl.gov Telephone: (239) 252-2667 8/6/2020 Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Addendum 2 Date: July 14, 2020 From: Evelyn Colon, Procurement Strategist To: Interested Bidders Subject: Addendum # 2: 18-7432-MP-Metropolitan Planning The following change is made to the above-mentioned Collier County solicitation: • This Addendum is to correct the bid due date: RPS OPENING DAY/DATE/TIME: AUGUST 6, 2019 AT 3:00PM AUGUST 6, 2020 AT 3:00PM If you require additional information, please post a question on the Online Bidding site or contact me at the information noted above. Please sign below and return a copy of this Addendum with your submittal for the above referenced solicitation. (Signature) Date (Name of Firm) Email: Evelyn.Colon@colliercountyfl.gov Telephone: (239) 252-2667 Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC 8/6/2020 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.A FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS EXH. 1.A - Page 1 of 9 FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION CFDA 20.205 FTA CFDA 20.505 (PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS) The supplemental conditions contained in this section are intended to cooperate with, to supplement, and to modify the general conditions and other specifications. In cases of disagreement with any other section of this contract, the Supplemental Conditions shall govern. Per uniform requirements of federal awards (2 CFR Part 200.23) the definition of CONTRACTOR is an entity that receives a contract (including a purchase order). The services performed by the awarded Contractor shall be in compliance with all applicable grantor regulations/requirements, and additional requirements specified in this document. It shall be the awarded Contractor’s responsibility to acquire and utilize the necessary manuals and guidelines that apply to the work required to complete this project. In general, 1)The contractor (including all subcontractors) must insert these contract provisions in each lower tier contracts (e.g. subcontract or sub-agreement); 2)The contractor (or subcontractor) must incorporate the applicable requirements of these contract provisions by reference for work done under any purchase orders, rental agreements and other agreements for supplies or services; 3)The prime contractor is responsible for compliance with these contract provisions by any subcontractor, lower-tier subcontractor or service provider. RPS 18-7432-MP,<<14 of 31>> 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.A FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS EXH. 1.A - Page 2 of 9 The following terms apply to all contracts in which it is indicated that the services involve the expenditure of federal funds: A.It is understood and agreed that all rights of the Local Agency relating to inspection, review, approval, patents, copyrights, and audit of the work, tracing, plans, specifications, maps, data, andcost records relating to this Agreement shall also be reserved and held by authorized representatives of the United States of America. B.All tracings, plans, specifications, maps, computer files and/or reports prepared or obtained under this Agreement, as well as all data collected, together with summaries and charts derivedtherefrom, will be considered works made for hire and will become the property of the Agency upon completion or termination without restriction or limitation on their use and will be made available,upon request, to the Agency at any time during the performance of such services and/or completion or termination of this Agreement. Upon delivery to the Agency of said document(s), the Agencywill become the custodian thereof in accordance with Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. The Consultant will not copyright any material and products or patent any invention developed underthis agreement. The Agency will have the right to visit the site for inspection of the work and the products of the Consultant at any time. C.It is understood and agreed that, in order to permit federal participation, no supplemental agreement of any nature may be entered into by the parties hereto with regard to the work to beperformed hereunder without the approval of the U.S. Department of Transportation, anything to the contrary in this Agreement notwithstanding. D.The consultant shall provide access by the Florida Department of Transportation, the County, theFederal Highway Administration, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Inspector General, the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives to anybooks, documents, papers, and records of the consultant which are directly pertinent to that specific contract for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts, and transcriptions. E.Compliance with Regulations: The Consultant shall comply with the Regulations relative tonondiscrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation Title49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time, (hereinafterreferred to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of thisAgreement. F.Nondiscrimination: The Consultant, with regard to the work performed during the contract, shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion or familystatus in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurements of material andleases of equipment. The Consultant shall not participate either directly or indirectly in thediscrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment practices whenthe contract covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the Regulations. G.Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In allsolicitations made by the Consultant, either by competitive bidding or negotiation for work to beperformed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, eachpotential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the Consultant of the Consultant's obligationsunder this contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the basis of race, color,national origin, sex, age, disability, religion or family status. H.Information and Reports: The Consultant will provide all information and reports required by theRegulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records,accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the Local Agency,Florida Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Federal TransitAdministration, Federal Aviation Administration, and/or Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrationto be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations, orders and instructions. Where anyinformation required of the Consultant is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refusesto furnish this information, the Consultant shall so certify to the Local Agency, Florida Departmentof Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Federal RPS 18-7432-MP,<<15 of 31>> 0956 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.A FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS EXH. 1.A - Page 3 of 9 Aviation Administration, and/or the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. I.Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the Consultant's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, the Local Agency shall impose such contractsanctions as it or the Florida Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Federal Aviation Administration, and/or Federal Motor CarrierSafety Administration may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to, 1.withholding of payments to the Consultant under the contract until the Consultant complies and/or 2.cancellation, termination or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part. J.Incorporation of Provisions: The Consultant will include these provisions in every subcontract,including procurements of materials and leases of equipment unless exempt by the Regulations,order, or instructions issued pursuant thereto. The Consultant shall take such action with respectto any subcontract or procurement as the Local Agency, Florida Department of Transportation,Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Federal Aviation Administration,and/or the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration may direct as a means of enforcing suchprovisions, including sanctions for noncompliance. In the event a Consultant becomes involved in,or is threatened with, litigation with a subconsultant or supplier as a result of such direction, theConsultant may request the Local Agency to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of theLocal Agency, and, in addition, the Consultant may request the United States to enter into suchlitigation to protect the interests of the United States. K.Compliance with Nondiscrimination Statutes and Authorities: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); and 49 CFR Part 21; The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. § 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects); Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. § 324 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex); Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR Part 27; The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age); Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, (49 USC § 471, Section 47123), as amended, (prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or sex); The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms “programs or activities” to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal-aid recipients, sub-recipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not); Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing entities (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131 -- 12189) as implemented by Department of Transportation regulations at 49 C.F.R. parts 37 and 38; The Federal Aviation Administration’s Non-discrimination statute (49 U.S.C. § 47123) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and sex); Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, which ensures non-discrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations; Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI, you must take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to your programs (70 Fed. Reg. at 74087 to 74100); Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq). RPS 18-7432-MP,<<16 of 31>> 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.A FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS EXH. 1.A - Page 4 of 9 L.Interest of Members of Congress: No member of or delegate to the Congress of the United Stateswill be admitted to any share or part of this contract or to any benefit arising therefrom. M.Interest of Public Officials: No member, officer, or employee of the public body or of a local publicbody during his tenure or for one year thereafter shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this contract or the proceeds thereof. For purposes of this provision, public body shall include municipalities and other political subdivisions of States; and public corporations, boards, andcommissions established under the laws of any State. N.Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises: The overall goal for the Florida Department of Transportation’s (FDOT) Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program for FHWA and FTA assisted contracts is established on a triennial basis. The overall goal for federal fiscal years 2018 – 2020 has been set at 10.65% race-neutral utilizing the methodologies described in 49 CRF Part 26. This means that the State's goal is to spend at least 10.65% of the federal aid dollars with Certified DBE's as prime firms or as sub- contractors/sub-Contractors. Race-neutrality means that the Department has demonstrated that the 10.65% overall goal can be achieved through the normal competitive procurement process without using DBE contract goals. Prompt Payment: The prime contractor agrees to pay each subcontractor under this prime contract for satisfactory performance of its contract no later than 30 days from the receipt of each payment the prime contract receives from the BCC. Retainage: If retainage from DBE subcontractors is allowed per the contract, the prime contractor agrees further to return retainage payments to each subcontractor within 30 days after the subcontractors work is satisfactorily completed. Any delay or postponement of payment from the above referenced time frame may occur only for good cause following written approval of the COUNTY. The Consultant shall agree to abide by the following statement from 49 CFR 26.13(b). Thisstatement shall be included in all subsequent agreements between the Consultant and any subconsultant or contractor. The Consultant, sub recipient or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the Consultant to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in termination of this contract or other such remedy as the recipient deems appropriate. O.It is mutually understood and agreed that the willful falsification, distortion or misrepresentation withrespect to any facts related to the project(s) described in this Agreement is a violation of the FederalLaw. Accordingly, United States Code, Title 18, Section 1020, is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement. P.It is understood and agreed that if the Consultant at any time learns that the certification it provided the Local Agency in compliance with 49 CFR, Section 26.51, was erroneous when submitted orhas become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances, the Consultant shall provide immediate written notice to the Local Agency. It is further agreed that the clause titled "CertificationRegarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered Transaction" as set forth in 49 CFR, Section 29.510, shall be included by the Consultant in all lowertier covered transactions and in all aforementioned federal regulation. Q.The Local Agency hereby certifies that neither the consultant nor the consultant's representativehas been required by the Local Agency, directly or indirectly as an express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this contract, to 1.employ or retain, or agree to employ or retain, any firm or person, or RPS 18-7432-MP,<<17 of 31>> 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.A FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS EXH. 1.A - Page 5 of 9 2.pay, or agree to pay, to any firm, person, or organization, any fee, contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind; The Local Agency further acknowledges that this agreement will be furnished to a federal agency, in connection with this contract involving participation of Federal-Aid funds, and is subject to applicable State and Federal Laws, both criminal and civil. R.The Consultant hereby certifies that it has not: 1.employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee, or otherconsideration, any firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for theabove contractor) to solicit or secure this contract; 2.agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or retainthe services of any firm or person in connection with carrying out this contract; or 3.paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for the above contractor) any fee contribution, donation, or consideration ofany kind for, or in connection with, procuring or carrying out the contract. The consultant further acknowledges that this agreement will be furnished to the Local Agency, the State of Florida Department of Transportation and a federal agency in connection with this contract involving participation of Federal-Aid funds, and is subject to applicable State and Federal Laws, both criminal and civil. S.The Consultant shall utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the Contractor during the term of the Contract and shall expressly require any subcontractors performing work or providing services pursuant to the Contract to likewise utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the subcontractor during the Contract term. T.Access to Records and Reports (Applies to Subcontracts at Every Tier): a). Record Retention. The Contractor will retain, and will require its subcontractors of all tiers to retain, complete and readily accessible records related in whole or in part to the contract, including, but not limited to, data, documents, reports, statistics, sub-agreements, leases, subcontracts, arrangements, other third-party agreements of any type, and supporting materials related to those records. b). Retention Period. The Contractor agrees to comply with the record retention requirements in accordance with 2 C.F.R. § 200.333. The Contractor shall maintain all books, records, accounts and reports required under this Contract for a period of at not less than three (3) years after the date of termination or expiration of this Contract, except in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of this Contract, in which case records shall be maintained until the disposition of all such litigation, appeals, claims or exceptions related thereto. c). Access to Records. The Contractor agrees to provide sufficient access to FTA and its contractors to inspect and audit records and information related to performance of this contract as reasonably may be required. d). Access to the Sites of Performance. The Contractor agrees to permit FTA and its contractors’ access to the sites of performance under this contract as reasonably may be required. U.Clean Air Act and Water Pollution Control Act (Applies to Subcontracts Over $150,000 at Every Tier): The Contractor agrees: 1) It will not use any violating facilities; 2) It will report the use of facilities placed on or likely to be placed on the U.S. EPA “List of Violating Facilities;” 3) It will report violations of use of prohibited facilities to FTA of FHWA as applicable; and 4) It will comply with the inspection and other requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended, (42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 – 7671q); and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended, (33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387). 5) RPS 18-7432-MP,<<18 of 31>> 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.A FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS EXH. 1.A - Page 6 of 9 The Contractor also agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA or FHWA as applicable. V.Federal Changes: Contractor shall at all times comply with all applicable FTA regulations, policies, procedures and directives, including without limitation those listed directly or by reference in the Master Agreement between Purchaser and FTA, as they may be amended or promulgated from time to time during the term of this contract. Contractor's failure to so comply shall constitute a material breach of this contract. W.Incorporation of FTA Terms (Applies to Subcontracts): The preceding provisions include, in part, certain Standard Terms and Conditions required by DOT, whether or not expressly set forth in the preceding contract provisions. All contractual provisions required by DOT, as set forth in FTA Circular 4220.1F, are hereby incorporated by reference. Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, all FTA mandated terms shall be deemed to control in the event of a conflict with other provisions contained in this Agreement. The Contractor shall not perform any act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with any MPO requests which would cause the MPO to be in violation of the FTA terms and conditions. X.Lobbying: Contractors who apply or bid for an award of $100,000 or more shall file the certification required by 49 CFR part 20, "New Restrictions on Lobbying." Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Each tier shall also disclose the name of any registrant under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 who has made lobbying contacts on its behalf with non-Federal funds with respect to that Federal contract, grant or award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the recipient. Y.No Government Obligation to Third Parties: The Contractor shall acknowledge and agree that, notwithstanding any concurrence by the Federal Government in or approval of the solicitation or award of the underlying Contract, absent the express written consent by the Federal Government, the Federal Government is not a party to this Contract and shall not be subject to any obligations or liabilities to the Recipient, Contractor or any other party (whether or not a party to that contract) pertaining to any matter resulting from the underlying Contract. The Contractor agrees to include the above clause in each subcontract financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by the FTA. It is further agreed that the clause shall not be modified, except to identify the subcontractor who will be subject to its provisions. Z.Program Fraud and False or Fraudulent Statements or Related Acts: Applies to subcontracts at every tier) (i) The Contractor acknowledges that the provisions of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, as amended, 31 U.S.C. § 3801 et seq. and U.S. DOT regulations, "Program Fraud Civil Remedies," 49 C.F.R. Part 31, apply to its actions pertaining to this Project. Upon execution of the underlying contract, the Contractor certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of any statement it has made, it makes, it may make, or causes to be made, pertaining to the underlying contract or the FTA assisted project for which this contract work is being performed. In addition to other penalties that may be applicable, the Contractor further acknowledges that if it makes, or causes to be made, a false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim, statement, submission, or certification, the Federal Government reserves the right to impose the penalties of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 on the Contractor to the extent the Federal Government deems appropriate. (ii) The Contractor also acknowledges that if it makes, or causes to be made, a false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim, statement, submission, or certification to the Federal Government under a contract connected with a project that is financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance originally awarded by FTA under the authority of 49 U.S.C. chapter 53, the Government reserves the right to impose the penalties of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and 49 U.S.C. § 5323(l) on the Contractor, to RPS 18-7432-MP,<<19 of 31>> 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.A FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS EXH. 1.A - Page 7 of 9 the extent the Federal Government deems appropriate. (iii) The Contractor agrees to include the above two clauses in each subcontract financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA. It is further agreed that the clauses shall not be modified, except to identify the subcontractor who will be subject to the provisions. Recycled Products: (Applies to subcontracts at every tier for purchases $10,000 or more of one of these items in a fiscal year, or when the cost of such items purchased during the previous fiscal year was $10,000.) Recovered Materials. The Contractor agrees to provide a preference for those products and services that conserve natural resources, protect the environment, and are energy efficient by complying with and facilitating compliance with Section 6002 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 6962, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), “Comprehensive Procurement Guideline for Products Containing Recovered Materials,” 40 C.F.R. part 247. AA. Indemnification: To the maximum extent permitted by Florida law, CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the MPO, its officers and employees from any and all liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees and paralegals’ fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of CONSULTANT or anyone employed or utilized by the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. This indemnification obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or reduce any other rights or remedies which otherwise may be available to an indemnified party or person described in this paragraph. This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of MPO. The duty to defend under this provision is independent and separate from the duty to indemnify, and the duty to defend exists regardless of any ultimate liability of the CONSULTANT, the MPO and any indemnified party. The duty to defend arises immediately upon presentation of a claim by any party and written notice of such claim being provided to CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT’s obligation to indemnify and defend under this provision will survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement until it is determined by final judgment that an action against the MPO or an indemnified party for the matter indemnified hereunder is fully and finally barred by the applicable statute of limitations. BB. 1. This Agreement is a fixed term contract for the professional services of CONSULTANT. It is agreed that either party hereto shall at any and all times have the right and option to terminate this Agreement by giving to the other party not less than thirty (30) days prior written notice of such termination. Upon this Agreement being so terminated by either party hereto, neither party hereto shall have any further rights or obligations under this Agreement subsequent to the date of termination, except that Services specified to be performed under a previously issued Work Order, shall proceed to completion under the terms of this Agreement. 2.The CONSULTANT shall be considered in material default of this Agreement and such default will be considered cause for the MPO to terminate this Agreement and any Work Orders in effect, in whole or in part, as further set forth in this section, for any of the following reasons: (a) CONSULTANT’s failure to begin Services under any particular Work Order within the times specified under that Work Order, or (b) CONSULTANT's failure to properly and timely perform the Services to be provided hereunder or as directed by the MPO, or (c) the bankruptcy or insolvency or a general assignment for the benefit of creditors by CONSULTANT or by any of CONSULTANT's principals, officers or directors, or (d) CONSULTANT's failure to obey any laws, ordinances, regulations or other codes of conduct, or (e) CONSULTANT's failure to perform or abide by the terms and conditions of this Agreement and any Work Orders in effect, or (f) for any other just cause. The MPO may so terminate this Agreement and any Work Orders in effect, in whole or in part, by giving the CONSULTANT seven (7) calendar days written notice of the material default. RPS 18-7432-MP,<<20 of 31>> 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.A FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS EXH. 1.A - Page 8 of 9 3. If, after notice of termination of this Agreement as provided for in paragraph 1 above, it is determined for any reason that CONSULTANT was not in default, or that its default was excusable, or that the MPO otherwise was not entitled to the remedy against CONSULTANT provided for in paragraph 2, then the notice of termination given pursuant to paragraph 2 shall be deemed to be the notice of termination provided for in paragraph 4, below, and CONSULTANT’s remedies against the MPO shall be the same as and be limited to those afforded CONSULTANT under paragraph 4 below. 4.Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary (including the provisions of paragraph 1 above), the MPO shall have the right to terminate this Agreement and any Work Orders in effect, in whole or in part, without cause upon seven (7) calendar days written notice to CONSULTANT. In the event of such termination for convenience, CONSULTANT's recovery against the MPO shall be limited to that portion of the fee earned through the date of termination, for any Work Orders so cancelled, together with any retainage withheld and any costs reasonably incurred by CONSULTANT that are directly attributable to the termination, but CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to any other or further recovery against the MPO, including, but not limited to, anticipated fees or profits on Services not required to be performed. CONSULTANT must mitigate all such costs to the greatest extent reasonably possible. 5.Upon termination and as directed by the MPO, the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the MPO all original papers, records, documents, drawings, models, and other material set forth and described in this Agreement, including those described in Article 6, that are in CONSULTANT’s possession or under its control arising out of or relating to this Agreement or any Work Orders. 6.The MPO shall have the power to suspend all or any portions of the Services to be provided by CONSULTANT hereunder upon giving CONSULTANT two (2) calendar days prior written notice of such suspension. If all or any portion of the Services to be rendered hereunder are so suspended, the CONSULTANT's sole and exclusive remedy shall be to seek an extension of time to its schedule in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article Four herein. 7.In the event (i) the MPO fails to make any undisputed payment to CONSULTANT within forty- five (45) days after such payment is due as set forth in the Work Order or such other time as required by Florida’s Prompt Payment Act or (ii) the MPO otherwise persistently fails to fulfill some material obligation owed by the MPO to CONSULTANT under this Agreement or subsequently issued Work Order, and (ii) the MPO has failed to cure such default within fourteen (14) days of receiving written notice of same from CONSULTANT, then CONSULTANT may stop its performance under the subject Work Order until such default is cured, after giving the MPO a second fourteen (14) days written notice of CONSULTANT’s intention to stop performance under the applicable Work Order. If the Services are so stopped for a period of one hundred and twenty (120)consecutive days through no act or fault of the CONSULTANT or its subconsultant or subcontractor or their agents or employees or any other persons performing portions of the Services under contract with the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT may terminate the subject Work Order by giving written notice to the MPO of CONSULTANT’s intent to terminate that Work Order. If the MPO does not cure its default within fourteen (14) days after receipt of CONSULTANT’s written notice, CONSULTANT may, upon fourteen (14) additional days' written notice to the MPO, terminate the subject Work Order and recover from the MPO payment for Services performed through the termination date, but in no event shall CONSULTANT be entitled to payment for Services not performed or any other damages from the MPO. CC. Administrative, Contractual, or Legal Remedies (over $250,000): Unless otherwise provided in this contract, all claims, counter-claims, disputes and other matters in question between the local government and the contractor, arising out of or relating to this contract, or the breach of it, will be decided by arbitration, if the parties mutually agree, or in a Florida court of competent jurisdiction. RPS 18-7432-MP,<<21 of 31>> 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.A FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS EXH. 1.A - Page 9 of 9 DD. Department of Homeland Security Seal, Logo, and Flags: The contractor shall not use the DHS seal(s), logos, crests, or reproductions of flags or likenesses of DHS agency officials without specific FEMA pre-approval. EE. The contractor shall comply with any mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency which are contained in the Florida state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (Pub. L. 94-163, 89 Stat. 871, 42 U.S.C Section 6201). FF. Fly America (Applies to Subcontracts): The Contractor agrees to comply with the following: a)Definitions. As used in this clause-- •“International air transportation” means transportation by air between a place in the United States and a place outside the United States or between two places both of which are outside the United States. •“United States” means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas. •“U.S.-flag air carrier” means an air carrier holding a certificate under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 411. b)When Federal funds are used to fund travel, Section 5 of the International Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices Act of 1974 (49 U.S.C. 40118) (Fly America Act) requires contractors, recipients, and others use U.S.-flag air carriers for U.S. Government-financed international air transportation of personnel (and their personal effects) or property, to the extent that service by those carriers is available. It requires the Comptroller General of the United States, in the absence of satisfactory proof of the necessity for foreign-flag air transportation, to disallow expenditures from funds, appropriated or otherwise established for the account of the United States, for international air transportation secured aboard a foreign- flag air carrier if a U.S.-flag air carrier is available to provide such services. c)If available, the Contractor, in performing work under this contract, shall use U.S.-flag carriers for international air transportation of personnel (and their personal effects) or property. d)In the event that the Contractor selects a carrier other than a U.S.-flag air carrier for international air transportation, the Contractor shall include a statement on vouchers involving such transportation essentially as follows: Statement of Unavailability of U.S.-Flag Air Carriers International air transportation of persons (and their personal effects) or property by U.S.-flag air carrier was not available or it was necessary to use foreign-flag air carrier service for the following reasons. See FAR § 47.403. [State reasons]_____________________________________________ e)The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (e), in each subcontract or purchase under this contract that may involve international air transportation. RPS 18-7432-MP,<<22 of 31>> 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.B GRANT CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES Exhibit 1.B – 1 GRANT CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS NEED TO BE RETURNED WITH SOLICIATION DOCUMENTS BY DEADLINE TO BE CONSIDERED RESPONSIVE B-2 Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters Primary Covered Transactions B-3 Certification of Lower-Tier Participants Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion B-4 Anticipated, Disadvantaged, Minority, Women or Veteran Participation Statement B-5,6 Bid Opportunity List for Commodities, Contractual Services or Professional Consultant Services B-7 Conflict of Interest B-8 Lobbying Activities B-9 Acknowledgement of Terms, Conditions, and Grant Clauses RPS 18-7432-MP,<<23 of 31>> 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.B GRANT CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES Exhibit 1.B – 2 COLLIER COUNTY Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters Primary Covered Transactions (1)The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and itsprincipals: (a)Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, orvoluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b)Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civiljudgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection withobtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction orcontract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commissionof embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making falsestatements, or receiving stolen property; (c)Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity(Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (l)(b)of this certification; and (d)Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more publictransactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. (2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in thiscertification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. ________________________________ _____________________________________ Name DUNS Number ________________________________ _____________________________________ Title Tax ID Number ________________________________ Firm _________________________________________________________________________ Street Address, City, State, Zip __________________________________ Signature RPS 18-7432-MP,<<24 of 31>> Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, GC 82-0845707Owner Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC 9010 Strada Stell Ct, Suite 108, Naples, Florida 34109 095637755 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.B GRANT CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES Exhibit 1.B – 3 COLLIER COUNTY Certification of Lower-Tier Participants Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion (1)The prospective Lower-Tier participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it andits principals: (a)Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, orvoluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b)Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civiljudgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection withobtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction orcontract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commissionof embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making falsestatements, or receiving stolen property; (c)Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity(Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (l)(b)of this certification; and (d)Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more publictransactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. (2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in thiscertification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. __________________________ ________________________________________ Name Project Name __________________________ ________________________________________ Title Project Number __________________________ ________________________________________ Firm Tax ID Number ________________________________________ DUNS Number _________________________________________________________________________ Street Address, City, State, Zip __________________________________ Signature RPS 18-7432-MP,<<25 of 31>> Adam Ahmad Owner Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC 18-7432-MP METROPOLITAN PLANNING GENERAL PLANNING SERVICES 82-0845707 095637755 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) IS THE ACTIVITY OF THIS CONTRACT,  CONSTRUCTION?               Y N CONSULTATION?               Y N OTHER?               Y N DBE, MBE, WBE  VET, SMB8A SUBCONTRACTOR OR SUPPLIER  NAME TYPE OF WORK OR  SPECIALTY ETHNICITY CODE  (See Below) SUB/SUPPLIER  DOLLAR AMOUNT PERCENT OF CONTRACT  DOLLARS TOTALS: NOTE: ETHNICITY CODE Black American BA Hispanic American HA Native American NA Subcont. Asian American SAA Asian‐Pacific American APA Non‐Minority Women NMW Other: not of any other group listed O DATE TELEPHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER IS THE PRIME A FLORIDA‐CERTIFIED DISADVANTAGED,  MINORITY OR WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE    (DBE/MBE/WBE)?  OR HAVE A SMALL DISADVANTAGED  BUSINESS 8A CERTIFICATION FROM THE SMALL BUSINESS  ADMINISTRATION?   OR A SERVICE DISABLED VETERAN?  VETERAN?                Y              N IS THIS SUBMISSION A REVISION?             Y                N SDB 8A?Y              N CONTRACT DOLLAR AMOUNT C.SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY PRIME VENDOR/CONTRACTOR NAME OF SUBMITTER DATE TITLE OF SUBMITTER WBE?Y              N MBE?Y              N DBE?Y              N This information is used to track and report anticipated DBE or MBE participation in federally‐funded contracts.  The anticipated DBE or  MBE amount is voluntary and will not become part of the contractual terms.  This form must be submitted at time of response to a  solicitation.  If and when awarded a County contract, the prime will be asked to update the information for the grant compliance files. COLLIER COUNTY ANTICIPATED DISADVANTAGED, MINORITY, WOMEN OR VETERAN PARTICIPATION STATEMENT Status will be verified.  Unverifable statuses will require the Vendor/Prime Contractor to either provide a revised statement or provide source  documentation that validates a status.   Contractor means an entity that receives a contract. B.IF PRIME HAS SUBCONTRACTOR OR SUPPLIER WHO IS A DISADVANTAGED MINORITY, WOMEN‐OWNED, SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN OR SERVICE DISABLED VETERAN, PRIME IS TO COMPLETE THIS NEXT SECTION A.VENDOR/PRIME CONTRACTOR INFORMATION PRIME NAME PRIME FEID NUMBER DEPARTMENT NAME COLLIER CONTRACT # (IFB/RFP or PO/REQ) IF YES, REVISION NUMBER__________ EMAIL ADDRESS OF PRIME (SUBMITTER) D.SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY COLLIER COUNTY ACCEPTED BY: GRANT PROGRAM/CONTRACT Exhibit 1.B – 4 RPS 18-7432-MP,<<26 of 31>> Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC 82-0845707 Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, GC 8/6/2020 Owner adam.ahmad@capitalengr.com 239.273.8894 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Prime Contractor/Prime Consultant: Address and Phone Number: Procurement Number/Advertisement Number: 1. Federal Tax ID Number:6.DBE 8.Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name:Non-DBE Less than $ 1 million 3. Phone Number:Between $ 1-5 million 4. Address Between $ 5-10 million 7.Subcontractor Between $ 10-15 million Subconsultant More than $ 15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number:6.DBE 8.Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name:Non-DBE Less than $ 1 million 3. Phone Number:Between $ 1-5 million 4. Address Between $ 5-10 million 7.Subcontractor Between $ 10-15 million Subconsultant More than $ 15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number:6.DBE 8.Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name:Non-DBE Less than $ 1 million 3. Phone Number:Between $ 1-5 million 4. Address Between $ 5-10 million 7.Subcontractor Between $ 10-15 million Subconsultant More than $ 15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number:6.DBE 8.Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name:Non-DBE Less than $ 1 million 3. Phone Number:Between $ 1-5 million 4. Address Between $ 5-10 million 7.Subcontractor Between $ 10-15 million Subconsultant More than $ 15 million 5. Year Firm Established: The list below is intended to be a listing of firms that are, or attempting to, participate on the project numbered above. The list must include the firm bidding or quoting as prime, as well as subs and suppliers quoting for participation. Prime contractors and consultants must provide information for Numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4; and, should provide any information they have for Numbers 5, 6, 7, and 8. This form must be submitted with the bid package. COLLIER COUNTY GRANT COMPLIANCE FORM BID OPPORTUNITY LIST FOR COMMODITIES, CONTRACTUAL SERVICES OR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES It is the policy of Collier County that disadvantaged businesses and minority vendors, as defined in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) or Florida Statutes (FS), must have the opportunity to participate on contracts with federal and/or state grant assistance. Exhibit 1.B – 5 RPS 18-7432-MP,<<27 of 31>> Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC 9010 Strada Stell Ct, Suite 108, Naples, Florida 34109 18-7432-MP 82-0845707 Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC 239.273.8894 9010 Strada Stell Ct, Suite 108 Naples, Florida 34109 2017 x x 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 1. Federal Tax ID Number:6.DBE 8.Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name:Non-DBE Less than $ 1 million 3. Phone Number:Between $ 1-5 million 4. Address Between $ 5-10 million 7.Subcontractor Between $ 10-15 million Subconsultant More than $ 15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number:6.DBE 8.Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name:Non-DBE Less than $ 1 million 3. Phone Number:Between $ 1-5 million 4. Address Between $ 5-10 million 7.Subcontractor Between $ 10-15 million Subconsultant More than $ 15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number:6.DBE 8.Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name:Non-DBE Less than $ 1 million 3. Phone Number:Between $ 1-5 million 4. Address Between $ 5-10 million 7.Subcontractor Between $ 10-15 million Subconsultant More than $ 15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number:6.DBE 8.Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name:Non-DBE Less than $ 1 million 3. Phone Number:Between $ 1-5 million 4. Address Between $ 5-10 million 7.Subcontractor Between $ 10-15 million Subconsultant More than $ 15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number:6.DBE 8.Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name:Non-DBE Less than $ 1 million 3. Phone Number:Between $ 1-5 million 4. Address Between $ 5-10 million 7.Subcontractor Between $ 10-15 million Subconsultant More than $ 15 million 5. Year Firm Established: BID OPPORTUNITY LIST FOR COMMODITIES AND CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AND PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES Continued COLLIER COUNTY GRANT COMPLIANCE FORM Exhibit 1.B – 6 RPS 18-7432-MP,<<28 of 31>> 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.B GRANT CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES COLLIER COUNTY Conflict of Interest Certification _______________________ Collier County Solicitation No. I, ________________________________________, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, neither I nor my spouse, dependent child, general partner, or any organization for which I am serving as an officer, director, trustee, general partner or employee, or any person or organization with whom I am negotiating or have an arrangement concerning prospective employment has a financial interest in this matter. I further certify to the best of my knowledge that this matter will not affect the financial interests of any member of my household. Also, to the best of my knowledge, no member of my household; no relative with whom I have a close relationship; no one with whom my spouse, parent or dependent child has or seeks employment; and no organization with which I am seeking a business relationship nor which I now serve actively or have served within the last year are parties or represent a party to the matter. I also acknowledge my responsibility to disclose the acquisition of any financial or personal interest as described above that would be affected by the matter, and to disclose any interest I, or anyone noted above, has in any person or organization that does become involved in, or is affected at a later date by, the conduct of this matter. Name Signature Position Date Privacy Act Statement Title I of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.), Executive Order 12674 and 5 CFR Part 2634, Subpart I require the reporting of this information. The primary use of the information on this form is for review by officials of The Justice Department to determine compliance with applicable federal conflict of interest laws and regulations. Additional disclosures of the information on this report may be made: (1) to a federal, state or local law enforcement agency if the Justice Department becomes aware of a violation or potential violation of law or regulations; (2) to a court or party in a court or federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party or in order to comply with a judge-issued subpoena; (3) to a source when necessary to obtain information relevant to a conflict of interest investigation or decision; (4) to the National Archives and Records Administration or the General Services Administration in records management inspections; (5) to the Office of Management and Budget during legislative coordination on private relief legislation; and (6) in response to a request for discovery or for the appearance of a witness in a judicial or administrative proceeding, if the information is relevant to the subject matter. This confidential certification will not be disclosed to any requesting person unless authorized by law. See also the OGE/GOVT-2 executive branch-wide Privacy Act system of records. Exhibit 1.B – 7 RPS 18-7432-MP,<<29 of 31>> 18-7432-MP Adam Ahmad Adam Ahmad Owner 8/6/2020 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.B GRANT CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES Exhibit 1.B – 8 COLLIER COUNTY Certification Regarding Lobbying The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge, that: (1)No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2)If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form- LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions. (3)The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by 31, U.S.C. § 1352 (as amended by the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995). Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The Contractor, __________________________, certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each statement of its certification and disclosure, if any. In addition, the Contractor understands and agrees that the provisions of 31 U.S.C. § 3801 et seq., apply to this certification and disclosure, if any. In addition, the Contractor understands and agrees that the provisions of 11.062, Florida Statutes., apply to this certification and disclosure, if any. Signature of Contractor's Authorized Official Name of Authorized Official and Title Date RPS 18-7432-MP,<<30 of 31>> Adam Ahmad, Owner 8/6/2020 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) EXHIBIT 1.B GRANT CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES Exhibit 1.B – 9 COLLIER COUNTY Acknowledgement of Terms, Conditions, and Grant Clauses Flow Down of Terms and Conditions from the Grant Agreement Subcontracts: If the vendor subcontracts any of the work required under this Agreement, a cop y of the signed subcontract must be available to the Department for review and approval. The vendor agrees to include in the subcontract that (1) the subcontractor is bound by the terms of this Agreement, (ii) the subcontractor is bound by all applicable state and federal laws and regulations, and (iii) the subcontractor shall hold the Department and Recipient harmless against all claims of whatever nature arising out of the subcontractor’s performance of work under this Agreement, to the extent allowed and required by law. The recipient shall document in the quarterly report the sub contractor’s progress in performing its work under this agreement. For each subcontract, the Recipient shall provide a written statement to the Department as to whether the subcontractor is a minority vendor as defined in Section 288.703, Fla. Stat. Certification On behalf of my firm, I acknowledge, and agree to perform all of the specifications and grant requirements identified in this solicitation document(s). Vendor/Contractor Name ______________________________ Date __________________ Authorized Signature ___________________________________________________________ Address _____________________________________________________________________ Solicitation/Contract # ____________________________ RPS 18-7432-MP,<<31 of 31>> Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC 8/6/2020 9010 Strada Stell Ct, Suite 108, Naples, Florida 34109 18-7432-MP 0956 77 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) INSURANCE AND BONDING REQUIREMENTS Insurance / Bond Type Required Limits 1. Worker’s Compensation Statutory Limits of Florida Statutes, Chapter 440 and all Federal Government Statutory Limits and Requirements Evidence of Workers’ Compensation coverage or a Certificate of Exemption issued by the State of Florida is required. Entities that are formed as Sole Proprietorships shall not be required to provide a proof of exemption. An application for exemption can be obtained online at https://apps.fldfs.com/bocexempt/ 2. Employer’s Liability $__500,000_ single limit per occurrence 3. Commercial General Liability (Occurrence Form) patterned after the current ISO form Bodily Injury and Property Damage $__1,000,000____single limit per occurrence, $2,000,000 aggregate for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. 4. Indemnification To the maximum extent permitted by Florida law, the Contractor/Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Collier County, its officers and employees from any and all liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees and paralegals’ fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Contractor/ Vendor or anyone employed or utilized by the Contractor/Vendor in the performance of this Agreement. 5. Automobile Liability $_500,000__ Each Occurrence; Bodily Injury & Property Damage, Owned/Non-owned/Hired; Automobile Included 6. Other insurance as noted: Watercraft $ __________ Per Occurrence United States Longshoreman's and Harborworker's Act coverage shall be maintained where applicable to the completion of the work. $ __________ Per Occurrence Maritime Coverage (Jones Act) shall be maintained where applicable to the completion of the work. $ __________ Per Occurrence Aircraft Liability coverage shall be carried in limits of not less than $5,000,000 each occurrence if applicable to the completion of the Services under this Agreement. $ __________ Per Occurrence Pollution $ __________ Per Occurrence Professional Liability $ _1,000,000__ Per claim & in the aggregate Project Professional Liability $__________ Per Occurrence Valuable Papers Insurance $__________ Per Occurrence Cyber Liability $__________ Per Occurrence Technology Errors & Omissions $__________ Per Occurrence 7. Bid bond Shall be submitted with proposal response in the form of certified funds, cashiers’ check or an irrevocable letter of credit, a cash bond posted with the County Clerk, or proposal bond in a sum equal to 5% of the cost proposal. All checks shall be made payable to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on a bank or trust company located in the State of Florida and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 8. Performance and Payment Bonds For projects in excess of $200,000, bonds shall be submitted with the executed contract by Proposers receiving award, and written for 100% of the Contract award amount, the cost borne by the Proposer receiving an award. The Performance and Payment Bonds shall be underwritten by a surety authorized to do business in the State of Florida and otherwise acceptable to Owner; provided, however, the surety shall be rated as “A-“ or better as to general policy holders rating and Class V or higher rating as to financial size category and the amount required shall not exceed 5% of the reported policy holders’ surplus, all as reported in the most current Best Key Rating Guide, published by A.M. Best Company, Inc. of 75 Fulton Street, New York, New York 10038. 9. Vendor shall ensure that all subcontractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Vendor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. 10. Collier County must be named as "ADDITIONAL INSURED" on the Insurance Certificate for Commercial General Liability where required. This insurance shall be primary and non-contributory with respect to any other insurance maintained by, or available for the benefit of, the Additional Insured and the Vendor’s policy shall be endorsed accordingly. 11. The Certificate Holder shall be named as Collier County Board of County Commissioners, OR, Board of County Commissioners in Collier County, OR Collier County Government, OR Collier County. The Certificates of Insurance must state the Contract Number, or Project Number, or specific Project description, or must read: For any and all work performed on behalf of Collier County. 12. On all certificates, the Certificate Holder must read: Collier County Board of County Commissioners, 3295 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 13. Thirty (30) Days Cancellation Notice required. 14. Collier County shall procure and maintain Builders Risk Insurance on all construction projects where it is deemed necessary. Such coverage shall be endorsed to cover the interests of Collier County as well as the Contractor. Premiums shall be billed to the project and the Contractor shall not include Builders Risk premiums in its project proposal or project billings. All questions regarding Builder’s Risk Insurance will be addressed by the Collier County Risk Management Division. 7/6/20 - CC ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vendor’s Insurance Statement We understand the insurance requirements of these specifications and that the evidence of insurability may be required within five (5) days of the award of this solicitation. The insurance submitted must provide coverage for a minimum of six (6) months from the date of award. Name of Firm _______________________________________ Date ____________________________ Vendor Signature _________________________________________________________________________ Print Name _________________________________________________________________________ Insurance Agency _________________________________________________________________________ Agent Name ___________________________________ Telephone Number ________________ 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Certificate of Status I certify from the records of this office that CAPITAL CONSULTING SOLUTIONS LLC., is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed electronically on March 15, 2017, effective March 13, 2017. The document number of this company is L17000059962. I further certify that said company has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2017, and its status is active. I further certify that this is an electronically transmitted certificate authorized by section 15.16, Florida Statutes, and authenticated by the code noted below. Authentication Code: 170316184801-500296491885#1 Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the Sixteenth day of March, 2017 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 1 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: THE E-VERIFY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR EMPLOYERS ARTICLE I PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY E-Verify is a program that electronically confirms an employee’s eligibility to work in the United States after completion of Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification (Form I-9). This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) explains certain features of the E-Verify program and describes specific responsibilities of the Employer, the Social Security Administration (SSA), and DHS. Authority for the E-Verify program is found in Title IV, Subtitle A, of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), Pub. L. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009, as amended (8 U.S.C. § 1324a note). The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 22.18, “Employment Eligibility Verification” and Executive Order 12989, as amended, provide authority for Federal contractors and subcontractors (Federal contractor) to use E-Verify to verify the employment eligibility of certain employees working on Federal contracts. ARTICLE II RESPONSIBILITIES A. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EMPLOYER 1.The Employer agrees to display the following notices supplied by DHS in a prominent place that is clearly visible to prospective employees and all employees who are to be verified through the system: a.Notice of E-Verify Participation b.Notice of Right to Work 2.The Employer agrees to provide to the SSA and DHS the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of the Employer representatives to be contacted about E-Verify. The Employer also agrees to keep such information current by providing updated information to SSA and DHS whenever the representatives’ contact information changes. 3.The Employer agrees to grant E-Verify access only to current employees who need E-Verify access. Employers must promptly terminate an employee’s E-Verify access if the employer is separated from the company or no longer needs access to E-Verify. 1292321 The parties to this agreement are the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC (Employer). The purpose of this agreement is to set forth terms and conditions which the Employer will follow while participating in E-Verify. 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 2 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: 4. The Employer agrees to become familiar with and comply with the most recent version of the E-Verify User Manual. 5. The Employer agrees that any Employer Representative who will create E-Verify cases will complete the E-Verify Tutorial before that individual creates any cases. a. The Employer agrees that all Employer representatives will take the refresher tutorials when prompted by E-Verify in order to continue using E-Verify. Failure to complete a refresher tutorial will prevent the Employer Representative from continued use of E-Verify. 6. The Employer agrees to comply with current Form I-9 procedures, with two exceptions: a. If an employee presents a "List B" identity document, the Employer agrees to only accept "List B" documents that contain a photo. (List B documents identified in 8 C.F.R. § 274a.2(b)(1)(B)) can be presented during the Form I-9 process to establish identity.) If an employee objects to the photo requirement for religious reasons, the Employer should contact E-Verify at 888-464-4218. b. If an employee presents a DHS Form I-551 (Permanent Resident Card), Form I-766 (Employment Authorization Document), or U.S. Passport or Passport Card to complete Form I-9, the Employer agrees to make a photocopy of the document and to retain the photocopy with the employee’s Form I-9. The Employer will use the photocopy to verify the photo and to assist DHS with its review of photo mismatches that employees contest. DHS may in the future designate other documents that activate the photo screening tool. Note: Subject only to the exceptions noted previously in this paragraph, employees still retain the right to present any List A, or List B and List C, document(s) to complete the Form I-9. 7. The Employer agrees to record the case verification number on the employee's Form I-9 or to print the screen containing the case verification number and attach it to the employee's Form I-9. 8. The Employer agrees that, although it participates in E-Verify, the Employer has a responsibility to complete, retain, and make available for inspection Forms I-9 that relate to its employees, or from other requirements of applicable regulations or laws, including the obligation to comply with the antidiscrimination requirements of section 274B of the INA with respect to Form I-9 procedures. a. The following modified requirements are the only exceptions to an Employer’s obligation to not employ unauthorized workers and comply with the anti-discrimination provision of the INA: (1) List B identity documents must have photos, as described in paragraph 6 above; (2) When an Employer confirms the identity and employment eligibility of newly hired employee using E-Verify procedures, the Employer establishes a rebuttable presumption that it has not violated section 274A(a)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) with respect to the hiring of that employee; (3) If the Employer receives a final nonconfirmation for an employee, but continues to employ that person, the Employer must notify DHS and the Employer is subject to a civil money penalty between $550 and $1,100 for each failure to notify DHS of continued employment following a final nonconfirmation; (4) If the Employer continues to employ an employee after receiving a final nonconfirmation, then the Employer is subject to a rebuttable presumption that it has knowingly 1292321 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 3 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: employed an unauthorized alien in violation of section 274A(a)(1)(A); and (5) no E-Verify participant is civilly or criminally liable under any law for any action taken in good faith based on information provided through the E-Verify. b. DHS reserves the right to conduct Form I-9 compliance inspections, as well as any other enforcement or compliance activity authorized by law, including site visits, to ensure proper use of E-Verify. 9. The Employer is strictly prohibited from creating an E-Verify case before the employee has been hired, meaning that a firm offer of employment was extended and accepted and Form I-9 was completed. The Employer agrees to create an E-Verify case for new employees within three Employer business days after each employee has been hired (after both Sections 1 and 2 of Form I-9 have been completed), and to complete as many steps of the E-Verify process as are necessary according to the E-Verify User Manual. If E-Verify is temporarily unavailable, the three-day time period will be extended until it is again operational in order to accommodate the Employer's attempting, in good faith, to make inquiries during the period of unavailability. 10. The Employer agrees not to use E-Verify for pre-employment screening of job applicants, in support of any unlawful employment practice, or for any other use that this MOU or the E-Verify User Manual does not authorize. 11. The Employer must use E-Verify for all new employees. The Employer will not verify selectively and will not verify employees hired before the effective date of this MOU. Employers who are Federal contractors may qualify for exceptions to this requirement as described in Article II.B of this MOU. 12. The Employer agrees to follow appropriate procedures (see Article III below) regarding tentative nonconfirmations. The Employer must promptly notify employees in private of the finding and provide them with the notice and letter containing information specific to the employee’s E-Verify case. The Employer agrees to provide both the English and the translated notice and letter for employees with limited English proficiency to employees. The Employer agrees to provide written referral instructions to employees and instruct affected employees to bring the English copy of the letter to the SSA. The Employer must allow employees to contest the finding, and not take adverse action against employees if they choose to contest the finding, while their case is still pending. Further, when employees contest a tentative nonconfirmation based upon a photo mismatch, the Employer must take additional steps (see Article III.B. below) to contact DHS with information necessary to resolve the challenge. 13. The Employer agrees not to take any adverse action against an employee based upon the employee's perceived employment eligibility status while SSA or DHS is processing the verification request unless the Employer obtains knowledge (as defined in 8 C.F.R. § 274a.1(l)) that the employee is not work authorized. The Employer understands that an initial inability of the SSA or DHS automated verification system to verify work authorization, a tentative nonconfirmation, a case in continuance (indicating the need for additional time for the government to resolve a case), or the finding of a photo mismatch, does not establish, and should not be interpreted as, evidence that the employee is not work authorized. In any of such cases, the employee must be provided a full and fair opportunity to contest the finding, and if he or she does so, the employee may not be terminated or suffer any adverse employment consequences based upon the employee’s perceived employment eligibility status 1292321 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 4 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: (including denying, reducing, or extending work hours, delaying or preventing training, requiring an employee to work in poorer conditions, withholding pay, refusing to assign the employee to a Federal contract or other assignment, or otherwise assuming that he or she is unauthorized to work) until and unless secondary verification by SSA or DHS has been completed and a final nonconfirmation has been issued. If the employee does not choose to contest a tentative nonconfirmation or a photo mismatch or if a secondary verification is completed and a final nonconfirmation is issued, then the Employer can find the employee is not work authorized and terminate the employee’s employment. Employers or employees with questions about a final nonconfirmation may call E-Verify at 1-888-464- 4218 (customer service) or 1-888-897-7781 (worker hotline). 14. The Employer agrees to comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and section 274B of the INA as applicable by not discriminating unlawfully against any individual in hiring, firing, employment eligibility verification, or recruitment or referral practices because of his or her national origin or citizenship status, or by committing discriminatory documentary practices. The Employer understands that such illegal practices can include selective verification or use of E-Verify except as provided in part D below, or discharging or refusing to hire employees because they appear or sound “foreign” or have received tentative nonconfirmations. The Employer further understands that any violation of the immigration-related unfair employment practices provisions in section 274B of the INA could subject the Employer to civil penalties, back pay awards, and other sanctions, and violations of Title VII could subject the Employer to back pay awards, compensatory and punitive damages. Violations of either section 274B of the INA or Title VII may also lead to the termination of its participation in E-Verify. If the Employer has any questions relating to the anti-discrimination provision, it should contact OSC at 1-800-255-8155 or 1-800-237-2515 (TDD). 15. The Employer agrees that it will use the information it receives from E-Verify only to confirm the employment eligibility of employees as authorized by this MOU. The Employer agrees that it will safeguard this information, and means of access to it (such as PINS and passwords), to ensure that it is not used for any other purpose and as necessary to protect its confidentiality, including ensuring that it is not disseminated to any person other than employees of the Employer who are authorized to perform the Employer's responsibilities under this MOU, except for such dissemination as may be authorized in advance by SSA or DHS for legitimate purposes. 16. The Employer agrees to notify DHS immediately in the event of a breach of personal information. Breaches are defined as loss of control or unauthorized access to E-Verify personal data. All suspected or confirmed breaches should be reported by calling 1-888-464-4218 or via email at E-Verify@dhs.gov. Please use “Privacy Incident – Password” in the subject line of your email when sending a breach report to E-Verify. 17. The Employer acknowledges that the information it receives from SSA is governed by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. § 552a(i)(1) and (3)) and the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1306(a)). Any person who obtains this information under false pretenses or uses it for any purpose other than as provided for in this MOU may be subject to criminal penalties. 18. The Employer agrees to cooperate with DHS and SSA in their compliance monitoring and evaluation of E-Verify, which includes permitting DHS, SSA, their contractors and other agents, upon 1292321 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 5 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: reasonable notice, to review Forms I-9 and other employment records and to interview it and its employees regarding the Employer’s use of E-Verify, and to respond in a prompt and accurate manner to DHS requests for information relating to their participation in E-Verify. 19. The Employer shall not make any false or unauthorized claims or references about its participation in E-Verify on its website, in advertising materials, or other media. The Employer shall not describe its services as federally-approved, federally-certified, or federally-recognized, or use language with a similar intent on its website or other materials provided to the public. Entering into this MOU does not mean that E-Verify endorses or authorizes your E-Verify services and any claim to that effect is false. 20. The Employer shall not state in its website or other public documents that any language used therein has been provided or approved by DHS, USCIS or the Verification Division, without first obtaining the prior written consent of DHS. 21. The Employer agrees that E-Verify trademarks and logos may be used only under license by DHS/USCIS (see M-795 (Web)) and, other than pursuant to the specific terms of such license, may not be used in any manner that might imply that the Employer’s services, products, websites, or publications are sponsored by, endorsed by, licensed by, or affiliated with DHS, USCIS, or E-Verify. 22. The Employer understands that if it uses E-Verify procedures for any purpose other than as authorized by this MOU, the Employer may be subject to appropriate legal action and termination of its participation in E-Verify according to this MOU. B. RESPONSIBILITIES OF FEDERAL CONTRACTORS 1. If the Employer is a Federal contractor with the FAR E-Verify clause subject to the employment verification terms in Subpart 22.18 of the FAR, it will become familiar with and comply with the most current version of the E-Verify User Manual for Federal Contractors as well as the E-Verify Supplemental Guide for Federal Contractors. 2. In addition to the responsibilities of every employer outlined in this MOU, the Employer understands that if it is a Federal contractor subject to the employment verification terms in Subpart 22.18 of the FAR it must verify the employment eligibility of any “employee assigned to the contract” (as defined in FAR 22.1801). Once an employee has been verified through E-Verify by the Employer, the Employer may not create a second case for the employee through E-Verify. a. An Employer that is not enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor at the time of a contract award must enroll as a Federal contractor in the E-Verify program within 30 calendar days of contract award and, within 90 days of enrollment, begin to verify employment eligibility of new hires using E-Verify. The Employer must verify those employees who are working in the United States, whether or not they are assigned to the contract. Once the Employer begins verifying new hires, such verification of new hires must be initiated within three business days after the hire date. Once enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor, the Employer must begin verification of employees assigned to the contract within 90 calendar days after the date of enrollment or within 30 days of an employee’s assignment to the contract, whichever date is later. 1292321 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 6 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: b. Employers enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor for 90 days or more at the time of a contract award must use E-Verify to begin verification of employment eligibility for new hires of the Employer who are working in the United States, whether or not assigned to the contract, within three business days after the date of hire. If the Employer is enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor for 90 calendar days or less at the time of contract award, the Employer must, within 90 days of enrollment, begin to use E-Verify to initiate verification of new hires of the contractor who are working in the United States, whether or not assigned to the contract. Such verification of new hires must be initiated within three business days after the date of hire. An Employer enrolled as a Federal contractor in E-Verify must begin verification of each employee assigned to the contract within 90 calendar days after date of contract award or within 30 days after assignment to the contract, whichever is later. c. Federal contractors that are institutions of higher education (as defined at 20 U.S.C. 1001(a)), state or local governments, governments of Federally recognized Indian tribes, or sureties performing under a takeover agreement entered into with a Federal agency under a performance bond may choose to only verify new and existing employees assigned to the Federal contract. Such Federal contractors may, however, elect to verify all new hires, and/or all existing employees hired after November 6, 1986. Employers in this category must begin verification of employees assigned to the contract within 90 calendar days after the date of enrollment or within 30 days of an employee’s assignment to the contract, whichever date is later. d. Upon enrollment, Employers who are Federal contractors may elect to verify employment eligibility of all existing employees working in the United States who were hired after November 6, 1986, instead of verifying only those employees assigned to a covered Federal contract. After enrollment, Employers must elect to verify existing staff following DHS procedures and begin E-Verify verification of all existing employees within 180 days after the election. e. The Employer may use a previously completed Form I-9 as the basis for creating an E-Verify case for an employee assigned to a contract as long as: i. That Form I-9 is complete (including the SSN) and complies with Article II.A.6, ii. The employee’s work authorization has not expired, and iii. The Employer has reviewed the Form I-9 information either in person or in communications with the employee to ensure that the employee’s Section 1, Form I-9 attestation has not changed (including, but not limited to, a lawful permanent resident alien having become a naturalized U.S. citizen). f. The Employer shall complete a new Form I-9 consistent with Article II.A.6 or update the previous Form I-9 to provide the necessary information if: i. The Employer cannot determine that Form I-9 complies with Article II.A.6, ii. The employee’s basis for work authorization as attested in Section 1 has expired or changed, or iii. The Form I-9 contains no SSN or is otherwise incomplete. Note: If Section 1 of Form I-9 is otherwise valid and up-to-date and the form otherwise complies with 1292321 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 7 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Article II.C.5, but reflects documentation (such as a U.S. passport or Form I-551) that expired after completing Form I-9, the Employer shall not require the production of additional documentation, or use the photo screening tool described in Article II.A.5, subject to any additional or superseding instructions that may be provided on this subject in the E-Verify User Manual. g. The Employer agrees not to require a second verification using E-Verify of any assigned employee who has previously been verified as a newly hired employee under this MOU or to authorize verification of any existing employee by any Employer that is not a Federal contractor based on this Article. 3. The Employer understands that if it is a Federal contractor, its compliance with this MOU is a performance requirement under the terms of the Federal contract or subcontract, and the Employer consents to the release of information relating to compliance with its verification responsibilities under this MOU to contracting officers or other officials authorized to review the Employer’s compliance with Federal contracting requirements. C. RESPONSIBILITIES OF SSA 1. SSA agrees to allow DHS to compare data provided by the Employer against SSA’s database. SSA sends DHS confirmation that the data sent either matches or does not match the information in SSA’s database. 2. SSA agrees to safeguard the information the Employer provides through E-Verify procedures. SSA also agrees to limit access to such information, as is appropriate by law, to individuals responsible for the verification of Social Security numbers or responsible for evaluation of E-Verify or such other persons or entities who may be authorized by SSA as governed by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. § 552a), the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1306(a)), and SSA regulations (20 CFR Part 401). 3. SSA agrees to provide case results from its database within three Federal Government work days of the initial inquiry. E-Verify provides the information to the Employer. 4. SSA agrees to update SSA records as necessary if the employee who contests the SSA tentative nonconfirmation visits an SSA field office and provides the required evidence. If the employee visits an SSA field office within the eight Federal Government work days from the date of referral to SSA, SSA agrees to update SSA records, if appropriate, within the eight-day period unless SSA determines that more than eight days may be necessary. In such cases, SSA will provide additional instructions to the employee. If the employee does not visit SSA in the time allowed, E-Verify may provide a final nonconfirmation to the employer. Note: If an Employer experiences technical problems, or has a policy question, the employer should contact E-Verify at 1-888-464-4218. D. RESPONSIBILITIES OF DHS 1. DHS agrees to provide the Employer with selected data from DHS databases to enable the Employer to conduct, to the extent authorized by this MOU: a. Automated verification checks on alien employees by electronic means, and 1292321 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 8 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: b. Photo verification checks (when available) on employees. 2. DHS agrees to assist the Employer with operational problems associated with the Employer's participation in E-Verify. DHS agrees to provide the Employer names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of DHS representatives to be contacted during the E-Verify process. 3. DHS agrees to provide to the Employer with access to E-Verify training materials as well as an E-Verify User Manual that contain instructions on E-Verify policies, procedures, and requirements for both SSA and DHS, including restrictions on the use of E-Verify. 4. DHS agrees to train Employers on all important changes made to E-Verify through the use of mandatory refresher tutorials and updates to the E-Verify User Manual. Even without changes to E-Verify, DHS reserves the right to require employers to take mandatory refresher tutorials. 5. DHS agrees to provide to the Employer a notice, which indicates the Employer's participation in E-Verify. DHS also agrees to provide to the Employer anti-discrimination notices issued by the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC), Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice. 6. DHS agrees to issue each of the Employer’s E-Verify users a unique user identification number and password that permits them to log in to E-Verify. 7. DHS agrees to safeguard the information the Employer provides, and to limit access to such information to individuals responsible for the verification process, for evaluation of E-Verify, or to such other persons or entities as may be authorized by applicable law. Information will be used only to verify the accuracy of Social Security numbers and employment eligibility, to enforce the INA and Federal criminal laws, and to administer Federal contracting requirements. 8. DHS agrees to provide a means of automated verification that provides (in conjunction with SSA verification procedures) confirmation or tentative nonconfirmation of employees' employment eligibility within three Federal Government work days of the initial inquiry. 9. DHS agrees to provide a means of secondary verification (including updating DHS records) for employees who contest DHS tentative nonconfirmations and photo mismatch tentative nonconfirmations. This provides final confirmation or nonconfirmation of the employees' employment eligibility within 10 Federal Government work days of the date of referral to DHS, unless DHS determines that more than 10 days may be necessary. In such cases, DHS will provide additional verification instructions. ARTICLE III REFERRAL OF INDIVIDUALS TO SSA AND DHS A. REFERRAL TO SSA 1. If the Employer receives a tentative nonconfirmation issued by SSA, the Employer must print the notice as directed by E-Verify. The Employer must promptly notify employees in private of the finding and provide them with the notice and letter containing information specific to the employee’s E-Verify 1292321 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 9 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: case. The Employer also agrees to provide both the English and the translated notice and letter for employees with limited English proficiency to employees. The Employer agrees to provide written referral instructions to employees and instruct affected employees to bring the English copy of the letter to the SSA. The Employer must allow employees to contest the finding, and not take adverse action against employees if they choose to contest the finding, while their case is still pending. 2. The Employer agrees to obtain the employee’s response about whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation as soon as possible after the Employer receives the tentative nonconfirmation. Only the employee may determine whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation. 3. After a tentative nonconfirmation, the Employer will refer employees to SSA field offices only as directed by E-Verify. The Employer must record the case verification number, review the employee information submitted to E-Verify to identify any errors, and find out whether the employee contests the tentative nonconfirmation. The Employer will transmit the Social Security number, or any other corrected employee information that SSA requests, to SSA for verification again if this review indicates a need to do so. 4. The Employer will instruct the employee to visit an SSA office within eight Federal Government work days. SSA will electronically transmit the result of the referral to the Employer within 10 Federal Government work days of the referral unless it determines that more than 10 days is necessary. 5. While waiting for case results, the Employer agrees to check the E-Verify system regularly for case updates. 6. The Employer agrees not to ask the employee to obtain a printout from the Social Security Administration number database (the Numident) or other written verification of the SSN from the SSA. B. REFERRAL TO DHS 1. If the Employer receives a tentative nonconfirmation issued by DHS, the Employer must promptly notify employees in private of the finding and provide them with the notice and letter containing information specific to the employee’s E-Verify case. The Employer also agrees to provide both the English and the translated notice and letter for employees with limited English proficiency to employees. The Employer must allow employees to contest the finding, and not take adverse action against employees if they choose to contest the finding, while their case is still pending. 2. The Employer agrees to obtain the employee’s response about whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation as soon as possible after the Employer receives the tentative nonconfirmation. Only the employee may determine whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation. 3. The Employer agrees to refer individuals to DHS only when the employee chooses to contest a tentative nonconfirmation. 4. If the employee contests a tentative nonconfirmation issued by DHS, the Employer will instruct the 1292321 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 10 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: employee to contact DHS through its toll-free hotline (as found on the referral letter) within eight Federal Government work days. 5. If the Employer finds a photo mismatch, the Employer must provide the photo mismatch tentative nonconfirmation notice and follow the instructions outlined in paragraph 1 of this section for tentative nonconfirmations, generally. 6. The Employer agrees that if an employee contests a tentative nonconfirmation based upon a photo mismatch, the Employer will send a copy of the employee’s Form I-551, Form I-766, U.S. Passport, or passport card to DHS for review by: a. Scanning and uploading the document, or b. Sending a photocopy of the document by express mail (furnished and paid for by the employer). 7. The Employer understands that if it cannot determine whether there is a photo match/mismatch, the Employer must forward the employee’s documentation to DHS as described in the preceding paragraph. The Employer agrees to resolve the case as specified by the DHS representative who will determine the photo match or mismatch. 8. DHS will electronically transmit the result of the referral to the Employer within 10 Federal Government work days of the referral unless it determines that more than 10 days is necessary. 9. While waiting for case results, the Employer agrees to check the E-Verify system regularly for case updates. ARTICLE IV SERVICE PROVISIONS A. NO SERVICE FEES 1. SSA and DHS will not charge the Employer for verification services performed under this MOU. The Employer is responsible for providing equipment needed to make inquiries. To access E-Verify, an Employer will need a personal computer with Internet access. ARTICLE V MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION A. MODIFICATION 1. This MOU is effective upon the signature of all parties and shall continue in effect for as long as the SSA and DHS operates the E-Verify program unless modified in writing by the mutual consent of all parties. 2. Any and all E-Verify system enhancements by DHS or SSA, including but not limited to E-Verify checking against additional data sources and instituting new verification policies or procedures, will be covered under this MOU and will not cause the need for a supplemental MOU that outlines these changes. 1292321 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 11 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: B. TERMINATION 1. The Employer may terminate this MOU and its participation in E-Verify at any time upon 30 days prior written notice to the other parties. 2. Notwithstanding Article V, part A of this MOU, DHS may terminate this MOU, and thereby the Employer’s participation in E-Verify, with or without notice at any time if deemed necessary because of the requirements of law or policy, or upon a determination by SSA or DHS that there has been a breach of system integrity or security by the Employer, or a failure on the part of the Employer to comply with established E-Verify procedures and/or legal requirements. The Employer understands that if it is a Federal contractor, termination of this MOU by any party for any reason may negatively affect the performance of its contractual responsibilities. Similarly, the Employer understands that if it is in a state where E-Verify is mandatory, termination of this by any party MOU may negatively affect the Employer’s business. 3. An Employer that is a Federal contractor may terminate this MOU when the Federal contract that requires its participation in E-Verify is terminated or completed. In such cases, the Federal contractor must provide written notice to DHS. If an Employer that is a Federal contractor fails to provide such notice, then that Employer will remain an E-Verify participant, will remain bound by the terms of this MOU that apply to non-Federal contractor participants, and will be required to use the E-Verify procedures to verify the employment eligibility of all newly hired employees. 4. The Employer agrees that E-Verify is not liable for any losses, financial or otherwise, if the Employer is terminated from E-Verify. ARTICLE VI PARTIES A. Some or all SSA and DHS responsibilities under this MOU may be performed by contractor(s), and SSA and DHS may adjust verification responsibilities between each other as necessary. By separate agreement with DHS, SSA has agreed to perform its responsibilities as described in this MOU. B. Nothing in this MOU is intended, or should be construed, to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any third party against the United States, its agencies, officers, or employees, or against the Employer, its agents, officers, or employees. C. The Employer may not assign, directly or indirectly, whether by operation of law, change of control or merger, all or any part of its rights or obligations under this MOU without the prior written consent of DHS, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Any attempt to sublicense, assign, or transfer any of the rights, duties, or obligations herein is void. D. Each party shall be solely responsible for defending any claim or action against it arising out of or related to E-Verify or this MOU, whether civil or criminal, and for any liability wherefrom, including (but not limited to) any dispute between the Employer and any other person or entity regarding the applicability of Section 403(d) of IIRIRA to any action taken or allegedly taken by the Employer. E. The Employer understands that its participation in E-Verify is not confidential information and may be disclosed as authorized or required by law and DHS or SSA policy, including but not limited to, 1292321 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 12 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Congressional oversight, E-Verify publicity and media inquiries, determinations of compliance with Federal contractual requirements, and responses to inquiries under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). F. The individuals whose signatures appear below represent that they are authorized to enter into this MOU on behalf of the Employer and DHS respectively. The Employer understands that any inaccurate statement, representation, data or other information provided to DHS may subject the Employer, its subcontractors, its employees, or its representatives to: (1) prosecution for false statements pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or; (2) immediate termination of its MOU and/or; (3) possible debarment or suspension. G. The foregoing constitutes the full agreement on this subject between DHS and the Employer. To be accepted as an E-Verify participant, you should only sign the Employer’s Section of the signature page. If you have any questions, contact E-Verify at 1-888-464-4218. 1292321 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 13 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Approved by: Employer Name (Please Type or Print) Title Signature Date Department of Homeland Security – Verification Division Name (Please Type or Print) Title Signature Date 1292321 Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC Adam Ahmad Electronically Signed 04/22/2018 USCIS Verification Division Electronically Signed 04/22/2018 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 14 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Information Required for the E-Verify Program Information relating to your Company: Company Name Company Facility Address Company Alternate Address County or Parish Employer Identification Number North American Industry Classification Systems Code Parent Company Number of Employees Number of Sites Verified for 1292321 Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC 5633 Strand Blvd, Suite 312 Naples, FL 34110 COLLIER 820845707 541 1 to 4 1 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 15 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Are you verifying for more than 1 site? If yes, please provide the number of sites verified for in each State: 1292321 FLORIDA 1 site(s) 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 16 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Information relating to the Program Administrator(s) for your Company on policy questions or operational problems: 1292321 Name Adam N Ahmad Phone Number (239) 273 - 8894 Fax Number Email Address adam.ahmad@capitalengr.com Name Kelly K Ahmad Phone Number (239) 200 - 7131 Fax Number Email Address adam.ahmad@capitalengr.com Name Adam N Ahmad Phone Number (239) 273 - 8894 Fax Number Email Address adam.ahmad@capitalengr.com 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Page 17 of 17 E-Verify MOU for Employers | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: 1292321 Page intentionally left blank 9.E.7 Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Capital Consulting Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) A GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE FIRM RPS NO.: 18-7432-MP PROFESSI ONAL SERV ICES LIBRARY METROPOLITAN PLANNING GENERAL PLANNING SERVICES CATEGORY PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY August 6, 2020 AT 3: 0 0 P M 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 2400 First Street | Suite 200 | Fort Myers | Florida | 33901 | 239.332.4846 August 6, 2020 Ms. Evelyn Colon, Procurement Strategist Procurement Services Division Collier County 3295 Tamiami Trail East Building C-2 Naples, FL 34112 RE: Professional Services Library, Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category, RPS 18-7432-MP Dear Ms. Colon, The T.Y. Lin International (TYLI) Team is pleased to present our qualifications and interest in providing Collier County with General Planning professional services for Transportation Engineering and Planning Consulting services. TYLI is a full-service transportation and infrastructure planning and engineering firm who has been providing world class professional services since 1954 and has been operating in the state of Florida since 1974. We have assembled a team of highly regarded individuals with extensive knowledge of the community, multimodal transportation systems, local conditions, needs, facilities and stakeholders within Southwest Florida. Our highly experienced, dedicated and responsive team includes the following firms: •T.Y. Lin International (TYLI) – Lead firm responsible for: team coordination; project management; transportation and transit planning; traffic engineering and design; corridor studies; environmental analysis; rail; freight; long range transportation planning (LRTP); regional planning; annual reporting; cost estimating; bicycle/pedestrian safety (Vision Zero) and complete streets; NEPA/environmental assessments; transportation regional incentive program (TRIP) applications; GIS mapping and analysis; efficient transportation decision making (ETDM) management; analysis, planning and reporting on climate change, sea level rise, coastal resiliency and infrastructure resiliency; socio-economic trends; compliance reporting; and quality assurance/quality control. Our value-added services include grants development/finance expertise, Viswalk – 3D bike/pedestrian simulation, 3D visualization, and full civil/electrical/architectural engineering services for transit facilities planning and development. RESPONSIBLE OFFICE 2400 First Street Suite 200 Fort Myers, FL 33901 CONTACT PERSON Jim Molnar, PE Project Manager Phone: (239) 332-4846 Email: jmolnar@tylin.com T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL ENR Rankings 2020 #11 in Transportation #15 in Mass Transit and Rail Design #11 in Bridges #11 in Highways #23 in Airports Industry Leader in Complete Streets National Complete Streets Coalition, Certified Instructor and Gold Partner Capacity TYLI has a global staff of 2,600 employees, and 150 in Florida Similar Project Experience TYLI holds continuing transportation engineering and planning services contracts with FDOT Districts One and Four, Broward MPO, Martin MPO, Lee County DOT, Collier County, and with several South Florida cities including Fort Myers, Sanibel, Fort Myers Beach, Miami, West Miami, Fort Lauderdale, and Delray Beach 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 2400 First Street | Suite 200 | Fort Myers | Florida | 33901 | 239.332.4846 •EPRpc (EPR) – will provide: traffic modeling; access management; traffic operations; level of service (LOS); travel demand forecasting; long range transportation planning; congestion management; safety planning; TRIP applications; ridership forecasting; automated connected autonomous vehicles and ride hailing; and travel demand management strategies. •Cella Molnar Associates, Inc. (CMA) – will manage: the public involvement and community outreach; public participation plan updates; website development and maintenance; newsletter preparation; community surveys; public service announcements; news releases; and other informational material preparation and distribution. We asked these firms to join our team because of how well their skillsets and experience match the County’s goals and the broad range of assignments expected under this contract. EPR and CMA are both State certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs). All three firms have offices in Fort Myers and have a history of working together. TYLI has consistently received an A+ rating from FDOT for DBE participation on our contracts, which is a testament to our commitment to advance and support DBE/MWBE/SBE firms. Jim Molnar, PE will serve as the TYLI Team’s Project Manager. Jim has nearly 35 years’ experience and has served as Project Manager and successfully completed hundreds of Task Work Orders for multiple municipal clients in Southwest Florida including; Lee, Collier & Hendry Counties, and the Cities of Fort Myers, Marco Island, Sanibel, and Cape Coral through numerous professional services contracts. Our Team understands the County’s Comprehensive Plan, the Long-Range Transportation Plan, as well as the needs and challenges to be addressed in the short, mid, and long-term necessitated by growth in residents, employees, and visitors to Southwest Florida. Our mission will be to support the County in planning and realizing a predictable and reliable transportation system. A Vision Zero network! We are also aware of the need to integrate new and emerging transportation technologies, such as, e-scooters, connected and automated vehicles, electric buses, bicycle share programs, provide curb management for accommodation of completing and complementary modes of transportation and so on with limited funding sources. We are keenly aware of the need to coordinate and collaborate with regional transportation authorities, the FDOT, SWFTI, as well as other municipalities to successfully deliver projects. The TYLI Team is well qualified, available and eager to partner with the County to implement its overall mobility vision. We appreciate this opportunity and look forward to serving the people of Collier County. Sincerely T.Y. Lin International James Molnar, PE Vice President / Project Manager T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL TYLI is a corporation, incorporated in the State of California in 1954 and is registered as a legal entity in the State of Florida. TYLI has 39 domestic offices and 9 international offices. 5 Florida offices. Our Fort Myers office was established in 2002. 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 1 ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL Hoover Dam Bypass Nevada / Arizona 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category Ability of Professional Personnel 1 | Page T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL - SOLVING TODAY'S ENGINEERING CHALLENGES WITH CONSTRUCTABLE SOLUTIONS 1. Ability of Professional Personnel T.Y. Lin International, Inc. (TYLI) is a globally recognized, full-service infrastructure consulting firm that has been delivering superior solutions for more than 65 years. With a practice that is proudly rooted in the design of bridges, TYLI is ranked one of the top ten bridge design firms by Engineering News-Record. Since 1974 we have been providing transportation planning, design, and inspection services to municipal, county and state agencies within Florida and the Caribbean. As a major provider of professional services, we are licensed, insured, and staffed to meet the contract requirements and capable of completing multiple projects within tight schedules. TYLI will serve as prime consultant and lead many of the assignments anticipated under this contract. Our vast portfolio of transportation engineering and planning projects includes long- and short-range transportation plans, regional transit plans, multimodal corridor studies, safety studies, micro mobility, congestion management, intermodal and mobility hub planning and design services, urban design, as well as bicycle, pedestrian, and greenways planning (complete streets), and analyses and planning of the interconnection of these modes with transit (e.g., pedestrian, bicycle, park-and-ride).We provide a thorough understanding of the coordination and communication requirements that set planning projects apart from other types of work, and we understand the importance of focusing clearly on your objectives and demonstrating value to the public. We have expertise in all the transportation analyses that could be conducted under this contract, as well as with the socioeconomic, demographic, and physical characteristics that influence regional transportation planning activities. TYLI’s value added services include our LEED® Accredited Professionals to support County’s commitment to sustainable transportation design solutions. In addition, TYLI is involved in transportation and research at national level with Transportation Research Board (TRB) and works with Federal partners in developing the policies and guidance used by MPOs to implement Federal rules and legislation including the FAST Act. Our working relationship with the Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO) and the National Association of Regional Councils (NARC) provides us ready access to decision-makers and information that will directly benefit the County The approach of TYLI is “innovative when called for and conventional when appropriate.” With a commitment to delivering the highest quality product for every project, we strive to achieve simplicity, economy, and aesthetics while maintaining the highest professional standards, an uncompromising commitment to ethical practice, and timely responsiveness to our clients’ needs. We have a track record of successful local projects for a number of clients including; Collier County, Marco Island, Lee County, Fort Myers, Sanibel, and the FDOT. The key team members leading the effort to address the needs of Collier County are James Molnar, PE, as Project Manager and Atiq Alvi, PE, as Project Principal. The focus of these two professionals will be to exceed the expectations of the County through their coordinated efforts addressing the needs of each assignment. The remainder of the team will include Isabel Nayab, PE as Quality Control Manager; Boon Chong, PE and Farzin Zafaranian, PE as Structural Project Engineers; Richie White, PE as lead drainage engineer; Vikas Jain, AICP, GSIP as lead planner; Colin Henderson as lead Environmental Scientist supporting assessments, permitting, and mitigation; Francisco Alonso, PE will support grant applications; and Nyree Quintero, PE will oversee alternative delivery criteria package preparation, negotiation, and delivery. Figure 1, Hoover Dam Bypass Bridge Figure 2, Summerlin/Gladiolus Flyover, Lee County 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category Ability of Professional Personnel 2 | Page T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL - SOLVING TODAY'S ENGINEERING CHALLENGES WITH CONSTRUCTABLE SOLUTIONS The goal of these professionals will be to exceed the County’s expectations through their coordinated efforts addressing the needs of each task while ensuring the schedule is met. A brief description of the assigned staff and their capabilities are provided on the following pages. An organizational chart depicting task assignment and firm affiliation is included at the end of this section. We have supplemented our capable staff with handpicked professionals to provide their skills and experience and add expertise and depth to our TEAM. Also part of the TYLI TEAM will be EPR pc (DBE) for traffic operations, modeling, forecasting, planning, level of service analysis, and automated vehicles. Cella Molnar & Associates, Inc. (DBE) will direct Public Involvement, outreach and communication. Figure 3, Estero Boulevard Improvements, Fort Myers Beach This Team of professional have worked together closely on numerous projects over the past 20+ years. Project Manager: James Molnar, PE, will be the primary contact for the County and will orchestrate the development of the scope of services, assemble the project team and monitor project production from the Notice to Proceed through project completion. Jim has nearly 35 years’ experience in design, permitting and construction administration on a wide variety of civil engineering projects, with two-thirds of his career spent working on projects in and around southwest Florida. He has served as project manager on numerous contracts for Collier and Lee Counties and other clients over the past 25 years. Repeat contracts are a testament to our past success. Jim will make sure the County receives the quality services promised in this proposal and, as a Vice President of the firm, he will ensure the proper resources are made available to achieve that end. Project Principal: Atiq Alvi, PE, has over 25 years of experience in bridge engineering, which includes bridge design, preservation, inspection, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation projects and studies. He manages TYLI’s Central Florida Operations and serves as Technical Director of Bridge Rehabilitation in TYLI’s South Region of the United States. Mr. Alvi has managed over 30 FDOT Task-driven, Districtwide and GEC Contracts in his career so far and has firsthand knowledge of the type of coordination, communication and management skills required to manage the scopes schedules and budgets on multiple assignments. Quality Assurance/Quality Control: Isabel Nayab, PE, has more than 25 years of transportation engineering and public works experience. Her years of managing successful projects for the FDOT and other clients has illustrated the importance of quality control and provides her the experience to ensure the County is served. Isabel will be involved throughout the plans development process to assist the team where required. Our QA/QC approach will be proactive and documented. Planner: Vikas Jain, AICP, GISP, has over 17 years’ experience working on complex transportation and land use planning projects throughout the U.S. He has managed the technical aspects of motorized and non-motorized projects such as bikeway/sidewalk and transit feasibility studies, corridor studies, traffic impact studies, and site suitability studies for transit projects. He has extensive experience in developing long-range multimodal transportation/transit system plans, transit service plans, transit operations analysis, and capital cost and O&M cost models. Traffic Engineer: William Wuensch, PE, PTOE (EPR) has over 30 years of transportation engineering, traffic operations, and planning experience. He has consulted with communities and agencies in the northeast, mid-Atlantic, and Florida providing transportation planning and engineering services. Figure 4, Sunshine Skyway Bridge 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category Ability of Professional Personnel 3 | Page T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL - SOLVING TODAY'S ENGINEERING CHALLENGES WITH CONSTRUCTABLE SOLUTIONS Transportation Planner: Rich Perrin, AICP has 20 years’ experience with large-scale transportation planning projects across the country including serving 12 years as a Transportation Council’s executive director. He has successfully led all activities related to federally funded transportation policy, planning, and investment. Transportation Engineer/Planner: Justin Cooner, PE (EPR) has 9 years’ experience performing field assessments of traffic conditions and has been vital in reducing crash trends at numerous signalized intersections. As an in-house consultant for FDOT District 2, Justin was an integral part of the highway safety team. His services have helped to incorporate newly adopted complete street standards for projects in North Florida. Traffic Engineer/Complete Streets: Tom Errico, PE, has nearly 35 years’ experience in traffic engineering and planning performing access management, corridor studies, traffic operations studies, pedestrian studies, parking studies, safety evaluations, and traffic impact studies. Tom is one of only 20 instructors certified by the National Complete Streets Coalition to train professionals in Complete Streets design. Traffic Engineer/Modeling & Analysis: Cherry Xiong, PE has 20 years’ experience in transportation planning and multimodal microsimulation. Her principal expertise is in travel demand forecasting, operations planning, and transport hub planning and pedestrian modeling. Rail and Transit: Jim Eriksen, PE, has over 27 years of experience in railroad, transit, and highway projects. He has been responsible for all aspects of project development and construction. Roadway Engineer: Brian Werner, PE, has nearly 12 years of professional experience in planning and designing roadway, signing, and lighting plans for transportation projects of varying size and types including arterials, collectors, local roads and highway interchanges. From minor re-striping or complete streets implementation to capacity improvements for SR 836 (Dolphin Expressway) adjacent to the Miami International Airport, a $149M design-build project. Brian was highly involved in developing the alignment and profiles as well as reconfiguration of the Le Jeune Road interchange. Drainage Engineer: Richie White, PE has 28 years’ experience focused on hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, design, and permitting including; regional master planning, impoundment, highway drainage, bridge scour, bridge hydraulics, coastal engineering, pond siting, and environmental reclamation. In his 15 years at TYLI, he has worked almost exclusively on transportation drainage projects. Project Engineer: David Reynolds, PE has over 30 years’ experience in design of highway/roadway, horizontal/vertical layout, stormwater management, drainage, grading, earthwork, lighting, utility, erosion- sediment control, maintenance of traffic, public involvement, construction estimates, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, and scour countermeasure. Structural Engineer: Boon Chong, PE Mr. Chong has 30 years of structural engineering experience. He has been responsible for the overall conceptualization, production, and quality assurance for a wide variety of structural design projects. As Senior Structural Engineer, he actively participates in technical issues and monitors major projects. Mr. Chong’s experience focuses on the design of highway bridges and tunnels as well as transit facilities and special structural design. He has been responsible for the design of more than 70 bridges, with spans ranging up to 280 feet; the design of more than 50 retaining walls; the production of conceptual reports for an additional 40 bridges; and the design reviews of more than 200 bridges for various authorities. Figure 5, Complete Streets Gold Partner Figure 1, MDX 836 Design-Build 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category Ability of Professional Personnel 4 | Page T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL - SOLVING TODAY'S ENGINEERING CHALLENGES WITH CONSTRUCTABLE SOLUTIONS Structural Engineer: Farzin Zafaranian, PE has 22 years of experience in structural design and project management on a variety of structural engineering projects in Florida and the Southeast region of The United States. His expertise is in design and construction of precast prestressed and cast-in-place post-tensioned concrete structures. He has worked on various projects which have included but are not limited to: retaining wall design; mast arms and strain pole design; retrofit of signals; load rating; box culvert design, prestressed concrete girder bridges; continuous steel plate girder bridges; box girders. Environmental Scientist: Colin Henderson has over 30 years’ experience in planning, design, and construction administration of transportation and environmental projects. His work encompasses project management, preparation of assessment and remediation reports, biological monitoring, and permit compliance. He is experienced in construction oversight and coordinating with regulatory agencies and is proficient at obtaining environmental permits for mitigation and construction projects. Environmental Engineer: Lucien Tender, PE has over 24 years of technical and managerial experience in environmental permitting, site assessment, and remediation. He has extensively coordinated with multiple regulatory agencies, including the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), regional water management districts, and other federal, state and local agencies while securing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation. Public Involvement: Cella Molnar and Associates, Inc. Fort Myers based for over 20 years, CMA has conducted over 330 successful public involvement and outreach programs. They have planned and facilitated large-scale, statewide conferences and coordinated not-for-profit charity events as well as groundbreaking and ribbon-cutting ceremonies. Their familiarity and local knowledge of the vast and diverse communities will ensure that all public involvement programs are crafted to meet Collier County’s’ needs. Cost Estimator: Marco Lux, PE has 24 years of engineering experience and has been responsible for construction management services for roadway and highway improvement, airports, shipping docks and piers, commercial facilities, and other infrastructure projects. His expertise includes both new and renovation construction. Grant Writing: Frankie Alonso, PE has 25 years of professional experience as a municipal engineering consultant in South Florida and has helped numerous communities and institutions seek additional funding for needed projects. Successful applications have been received by the City of Miami Beach, and Florida International University among others. Cost Estimates: Nyree Quintero, MSc, PE has 24 years of professional experience working in alternative procurement process, design build and program management projects. She has a unique combination of extensive managerial and technical experience in design - build projects, Mrs. Quintero has vast expertise with large, complex projects, solid analytical competencies and the ability to leverage existing platforms into new, successful ventures. She also has considerable experience in contracts and construction management, negotiations and amendments, financial and overall management, project management, cost control, scheduling and estimating, risk assessment and planning. Figure 6, Plantation Road Extension, Fort Myers Figure 6, Davis Boulevard Ground Breaking, Collier County 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Atiq Alvi, PE1 PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE Road & Bridge Study, Planning and Design RPS 18-7432-RB QA Isabel Nayab, PE1 PROJECT MANAGER James Molnar, PE1 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Kaye Molnar3 Task Leader PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT OFFICER Kaye Molnar3 PUBLIC RELATIONS Ashlynn Super3 3D VISUALIZATION Ashlynn Super3 WEBSITE/SOCIAL MEDIA Ashlynn Super3 DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS William Wuensch, PE, PTOE 2 Task Leader TRAFFIC, BIKE, PED. COUNTS/TRANSIT SURVEY Justin Cooner, PE,2 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING Vikas Jain, AICP GISP1 Task Leader COMPLETE STREETS, BIKE/PED Tom Errico, PE1 BIKE SHARE Richard Perrin, AICP1 FREIGHT Richard Perrin1 HIGHWAY PLANNING/DESIGN Adriano Foti, PE1 STREETCAR/RAIL James Eriksen, PE1 PERFORMANCE MEASURES Richard Perrin, AICP1 TRAFFIC & MOT William Wuensch, PE, PTOE2 Brian Werner PE1 TRANSIT PLANNING Vikas Jain, AICP GISP1 Task Leader MICRO MOBILITY Richard Perrin, AICP1 CAPITAL COST James Eriksen, PE1 Access Management Modification William Wuensch, PE, PTOE2 Adriano Foti, PE1 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Meaghan Capuano, PE1 Task Leader TRAFFIC DEMAND FORECAST Cherry Xiong, PE1, PE William Wuensch, PE, PTOE2 PROJECT/DESIGN TRAFFIC William Wuensch, PE, PTOE2 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS Meaghan Capuano, PE1 SAFETY STUDIES Jessica Dimmick , PE2 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Jessica Dimmick , PE2 LANE ELIMINATION STUDY Vikas Jain, ACIP, GISP1 PLANS/STUDIES REVIEW James Molnar, PE1 SUPPORT DISCIPLINES VISWALK (BIKE/PED MICRO SIMULATION Cherry Xiong, PE1 NEPA/ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Colin Henderson, ENV SP1 STRUCTURES Boon Chong, PE1 Farzin Zafaranian, PE1 CIVIL Francisco Alonso, PE1 PERMITTING Colin Henderson1 Sara Gutekunst1 FIRM LEGEND 1.T. Y. Lin International 2.EPR, P.C. (MBD) 3.Cella Molnar & Associates (WMBE) “BIG” DATA MANAGMENT Jessica Dimmick , PE2 Cherry Xiong, PE1 GIS ANALYSIS Sara Gutekunst1 Prepared for PERMITTING Rich White, PE1 David Reynolds, PE1 ROADWAY Brian Werner, PE1 COST ESTIMATES Nyree Quintero, MSc, PE1 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RESUMES INDEX PREPARED FOR Alonso, Francisco, PE – Civil Alvi, Atiq, PE – Principal in Charge Capuano, Meaghan, PE – Task Leader Traffic Engineering / Traffic Operations Cella, Kris – Task Leader Public Involvement / Public Involvement Officer Chong, Boon, PE - Structures Cooner, Justin, PE – Traffic, Bike, Ped. Counts/Transit Survey Dimmick, Jessica, PE – “BIG” Data Management / Safety Studies / Traffic Analysis Eriksen, James, PE – Streetcar/Rail / Capital Cost Errico, Thomas, PE – Complete Streets, Bike/Ped Foti, Adriano, PE – Highway Planning/Design / Access Management Modification Gutekunst, Sara, – GIS Analysis / Permitting Henderson, Colin, ENV SP – NEPA/Environmental Analysis / Permitting Jain, Vikas, AICP GISP – Task Leader Transportation Planning & Transit Planning / Lane Elimination Study Molnar, James, PE – Project Manager / Plans/Studies Review Nayab, Isabel, PE – Quality Assurance Perrin, Richard, AICP – Bike Share / Freight / Performance Measures / Micro Mobility Quintero, Nyree, MSc, PE – Cost Estimates Reynolds, David, PE – Permitting Super, Ashylnn – Public Relations / 3D Visualization / Website/Social Media Werner, Brian, PE – Traffic & MOT / Roadway White, Richard, PE – Permitting Wuensch, William, PE, PTOE – Task Leader Data Collection & Analysis / Traffic & MOT / Access Management Modification / Traffic Demand Forecast / Project/Design Traffic Xiong, Cherry, PE – “BIG” Data Management / Traffic Demand Forecast / VISWALK Bike/PED Micro Simulation Zafaranian, Farzin – Structures Page 37 11 16 18 35 19 20 29 24 28 23 34 15 12 13 26 41 40 33 31 39 14 22 36 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Miscellaneous Professional Services CN 2020-01 ATIQ ALVI, PE Project Principal Mr. Alvi has over 25 years of experience in bridge engineering, which includes bridge design, preservation, inspection, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation projects and studies. He manages TY Lin International’s (TYLI) Central Florida Operations and serves as Technical Director of Bridge Rehabilitation in TYLI’s South Region of the United States. Atiq has managed over 30 FDOT Task-driven, Districtwide and GEC Contracts in his career so far and has firsthand knowledge of the type of coordination, communication and management skills required to manage the scopes schedules and budgets on multiple assignments. FDOT District Seven Sunshine Skyway Bridge Corridor Continuous Services Contract C-9H66; Project Manager. Atiq is currently TYLI’s Project Manager for this $5 million/5-year task-driven contract to maintain and preserve the Sunshine Skyway Bridge, Florida’s landmark structure. It mainly involves supporting the FDOT’s Project Manager, Mr. Steve Womble in the preservation of the Sunshine Skyway Bridge by providing structural engineering services, testing and designing repair/rehabilitation design projects. Under this contract we are currently designing a rehabilitation project and performing testing on the stay cables. FDOT District One, Districtwide Bridge Engineering Design Support Services, Florida; Project Manager. Atiq served as PM for this $1.5 million contract, which involved designing rehabilitation projects and providing engineering services for the District One DSMO. These services also include engineering evaluations, emergency response, project reviews, load ratings and inspection support. The repair projects consist of superstructure and substructure concrete repair, cathodic protection, movable bridge repair, coatings, scour protection and fender repair. FDOT District Two, Miscellaneous Bridge Repair, Various locations throughout Florida; Project Manager. This $750,000 stand-alone contract involves engineering services for the repair of 18 Jacksonville bridges in District Two. This includes heavy duty fender system replacement design with composite superstructure and polymeric piles; LED navigational lighting; concrete beam; bent cap and footing repairs; steel bearing repairs; protective coatings; segmental bridge internal lighting; and pedestrian lighting rehabilitation. FDOT District Seven, State Road (SR) 93 Sunshine Skyway Bridge Cable Painting and Lighting Rehabilitation Project, St. Petersburg Florida; Project Manager. Atiq is replacing the protective painting system of the stay cables and rehabilitation of the lighting system on the two tower cable stayed bridge. FDOT District Seven, Rehabilitation of Welch’s Causeway Bascule Bridge over Boca Ciega Bay, St. Petersburg, Florida; Served as Engineer-of-Record and Project Manager. This project involves structural steel repairs to movable span and concrete repairs on fixed spans, steel bridge painting (including hazardous materials assessment), complete tender house renovation, including roof replacement and installation of scour countermeasures. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 30 PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer FL #52245 EDUCATION MSCE, Civil Engineering, with Emphasis on Structures and Thesis on Composite Precast Deck Panel Bridges, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL BSCE, Civil Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL CERTIFICATIONS Certified FDOT/FICE Project Manager NHI LRFD Bridge Substructure Design NBI Fracture Critical Bridge Inspection NBI Bridge Inspector Refresher Training 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) JAMES MOLNAR, PE Senior Project Manager / Project Director Mr. Molnar has more than 30 year’s experience in the design, permitting and construction administration of a wide variety of civil engineering projects. His combination of technical and business education coupled with years of practical construction experience has proven invaluable in meeting the needs of clients in today’s environment of ever tightening fiscal, environmental and social constraints on major projects. Lee County Department of Transportation (LCDOT), Estero Boulevard Improvement Project, Town of Fort Myers Beach, Project Manager. This project entailed conceptual design of the six mile arterial comprising the only continuous route on the island. Plans included implementation of “complete streets” concepts, bicycle friendly lanes and shoulders, mid block pedestrian crosswalk designs, and innovative trolley pulloffs/pullouts and stops. City of Marco Island, Smokehouse Bay Bridge, Marco Island, Florida, Project Manager. Design of signature arch structure to replace aging parallel functionally obsolete concrete bridges and created a centerpiece for multi-modal transportation of the city’s redevelopment efforts. The single span structure was elevated to provide pedestrian and bicycle passage below, increase navigability and provide for recreational use. The single replacement structure was designed to allow half of the deck to be open to traffic before the second half was erected thereby minimizing disruption on this major arterial. Lee County DOT, Queue Jump, Lee County, Fort Myers, Florida; Senior Project Manager. This was a Federal Highway Administration test project to determine if a tolled overpass would relieve congestion at a signalized intersection. Project involved preliminary engineering, environmental, and structures design for the improvement of a congested intersection. Utilized AASHTO criteria and avoided a PD&E re-evaluation. Burnt Store Road from Pine Island Road to Kismet Parkway, Cape Coral, Florida; Senior Project Manager. The project consisted of designing a six-lane, limited access arterial utilizing median cross over u-turns and a frontage road for local traffic. Services included the design of nine new bridges, over four miles of six-lane construction, drainage design and permitting, multi-use paths and pedestrian facilities. Lee County, Summerlin Road Six-Laning, Fort Myers, Florida; Project Manager. The project widened a four-lane road to six for 4.5 miles from San Carlos to Gladiolus and included two grade-separated intersections. The design team developed a typical section that fit within the existing right-of-way. This resulted in avoiding impacts to wetland canals on both sides of the road and the ability to proceed under a Nationwide Corps of Engineers Permit, which was secured at the 60 percent plan stage. Lee County, Plantation Road Extension, Fort Myers, Florida; Project Manager. Design for a new one-mile alignment on an in-fill county roadway. Jim provided traffic analysis, utility relocations, roadway and drainage design, and permitting. City of Fort Myers, Winkler Avenue Canal Enclosure/Road Widening, Fort Myers, Florida; Project Manager and Lead Drainage Engineer. This 1.5 mile road runs through a highly developed urban area and required over 1000 feet of cast in place box culvert placed under the new pavement, a new four-lane bridge, and a railroad crossing. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 30 PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer FL #49237 EDUCATION MBA, Oakland University, 1991 BS, Civil Engineering, Wayne State University, 1985 AS, Building Construction Technology, Ferris State University, 1981 PROFESSIONALAFFILIATIONS Institute of Transportation Engineers Florida Engineering Society American Society of Civil Engineers 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Miscellaneous Professional Services CN 2020-01 ISABEL G. NAYAB PE Quality Assurance Mrs. Nayab’s experience includes design of open and closed stormwater collection systems, stormwater field investigations, design of stormwater management systems, permit coordination and documentation, highway planning, cost estimating, FDOT plans preparation, and preparation of Pond Siting Reports, Project Development and Environmental Studies, Bridge Hydraulic Reports, review of drainage connection permits, temporary drainage, and the preparation of MOT plans. Additional responsibilities include directly coordinating with clients and subconsultants, managing the drainage design team, performing Quality Control for drainage component of construction plans, providing cost effective solutions for RFIs, and training/mentoring junior staff engineers. FDOT District 4, I-95/Spanish River Interchange, Palm Beach County, FL; Drainage Engineer of Record. Responsible for the design of stormwater management facilities, conveyance systems, plans production, coordination with permitting agencies, and preparation of the Drainage Design Documentation Report for the new three level Spanish River Interchange. This project includes the construction of a new interchange, modification to the existing Yamato Road and I-95 interchange, addition of Auxiliary lanes from Glades Road to Congress Avenue on I-95 and cross street improvements of Spanish River and Yamato Road. This third level interchange includes coordination with FAA, Boca Airport, City of Boca Raton, and Florida Atlantic University (FAU). This improvement will provide connectivity between FAU, Tri-Rail and I-95 to daily congestion as well as event traffic generated during events held at the newly constructed FAU stadium. This project was awarded as a design-build after permitting. Isabel served as the design-build reviewer on behalf of District 4. Drainage Connection Permit Reviews - FDOT D5 -Senior Drainage Engineer. Responsible for the review of Drainage Connection Permits for the Department's Maintenance department as part of a GEC contract. Responsibilities included field visits to all submitted permits, review of permit applications and the Florida Administrative Code Chapter 14-86, meeting/coordinating comments and responses with permittees. FDOT District 1, District Wide Minor Design; Lead Drainage Engineer. Responsible for drainage design and permitting documents required for any minor design contracts, many of which included pedestrian safety upgrades and the addition of ADA compliant sidewalks. Responsibilities include coordination with the client as well as permitting agencies and municipalities. FDOT District 5, US 1 (SR 5) Milling and Resurfacing with Sidewalk Improvements, Volusia County, FL; Drainage Engineer of Record. Drainage Engineer of Record responsible for the drainage design and permitting of ADA compliant sidewalk improvements. SR 566 (Thonotosassa Road) Milling and Resurfacing - FDOT D7; Hillsborough County, FL. Drainage Engineer of Record. responsible for the design and permitting of open and closed storm sewer systems impacted by the addition of proposed ADA compliant sidewalk along the SB and NB travel lanes. This project extends from north of I-4 to West Baker Street in Hillsborough County. Responsibilities include preparing permitting documents for Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), plans production, and coordination with sub-consultants. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 24 PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer FL #54841 EDUCATION MS, Civil Engineering, Florida Institute of Technology, 1994 BS, Civil Engineering, Florida Institute of Technology, 1992 CERTIFICATIONS Advanced MOT FDOT Specifications SOFTWARE PROFICIENCIES MicroStation V8i ICPR Geopack Drainage adICPR 3.02 HY-8 HEC-12 MicroStation StormCadd GeopakDrainage and Site (V8XM) ASAD Culvert Life Estimator HEC-2 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) WILLIAM L. WUENSCH, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer/Planner Mr. Wuensch is a transportation engineer / planner who understands the importance of designing a transportation system that provides for multimodal mobility options within the context of the community and region. He works with stakeholders and agencies to understand and address the livability of a region or community by finding solutions that balance and optimize vehicular capacity needs, traffic circulation and parking opportunities, travel demand management, transit service strategies, and the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists. He has consulted with communities and agencies in the northeast, mid-Atlantic, and Florida providing transportation planning and engineering services. Norfolk Virginia Multimodal Transportation Plan; Senior Advisor. Mr. Wuensch is serving as a senior advisor to help identify strategies and specific improvements to help transform the City’s street system into a vibrant multimodal network to meet the City’s vision for the future of downtown mobility. In this role he is overseeing design suggestions to help ground truth feasibility and implementation strategies. FDOT District 2 Traffic Engineering Services. Mr. Wuensch worked on multiple contract cycles of this continuing engineering services traffic design contract to provide signalization designs for new signals, and signal upgrades, throughout north central and northeast Florida. Thru this contract he also developed coordinated signal timings for locations in Jacksonville. (working with DRMP) Downtown Mobility Study – City of Bradenton, Florida; Lead Project Traffic Engineer. Mr. Wuensch served as lead project traffic engineer for a mobility study for congested portions of Bradenton and Palmetto. The goal of the study was to develop strategies to relieve congestion through the central business districts and identify solutions that were context sensitive. Alternatives examined included converting two-way bridges to one-way pairs over the Manatee River, converting a one-way pair in Manatee to two-way operation, and providing additional linkages to adjacent arterial facilities as necessary to relieve traffic and create a more context sensitive environment in both downtown areas. (working with Renaissance Planning Group) Districtwide Miscellaneous Design – Florida Department of Transportation. Mr. Wuensch provided designs for traffic signals, signing and marking improvements, and turn lanes and median modifications, part of several continuing engineering contracts for Florida Department of Transportation, Districts One, Two, Three and Five. Plans were produced using as-builts or minimal survey for quick turnaround delivery. (while working with DRMP) Central Florida Expressway Authority. Mr. Wuensch worked served as lead traffic engineer and designer on the John Young Parkway interchange and CR 427 interchange with the Expressway system. He provided complete design services for signing and pavement markings, roadway lighting, and traffic signalization. (while with DRMP) Northern Turnpike Signing – Florida Department of Transportation, Turnpike Enterprise; Lead Traffic Engineer and EOR. Mr. Wuensch was lead traffic engineer and engineer of record for a route sign replacement project for 90 miles of Florida’s Turnpike between I-75 and I-4. including the section of the Beachline (formerly known as the Beeline) between I-4 and US 441. This effort included field survey, structural designs, utility coordination, sign lighting design, plans production, and construction phase services. (wile with DRMP_ YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 28 PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer FL #50680 EDUCATION BS. Civil Engineering, University of Central Florida, 1992 AFFILIATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers Institute of Transportation Engineers VASITE – Past President 2010-2013 Adjunct Instructor at UVA for Placemaking and Transportation Vice President – Board of Directors for JAUNT (regional paratransit provider) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Miscellaneous Professional Services CN 2020-01 VIKAS JAIN, AICP Senior Planner Mr. Jain has over 17 years of experience working on large scale complex transportation and land use planning projects throughout the U.S. He has managed the technical aspects of motorized and non-motorized projects such as bikeway/sidewalk and transit feasibility studies, corridor studies, traffic impact studies, and site suitability studies for transit projects. He has extensive experience in developing long-range multimodal transportation/transit system plans, transit service plans, transit operations analysis, and capital cost and O&M cost models. He has effectively integrated GIS and travel demand forecasting software data for socio-economic, land use, and demographic analysis to aid the team in preparing environmental assessments and impact statements under National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) guidelines. In his current role, he manages multidisciplinary teams to deliver projects to a multitude of clients including FDOT, MPOs, municipal clients as well as private sector entities. Northeast Plant City Master Plan, Plant City, Florida. Vikas developed a spatial model for land use suitability assessment using GIS as part of a master plan for lands located to the northeast of Plant City’s jurisdiction. Tasks associated with creating this model included an assessment of existing conditions through a GIS-based suitability analysis, development of guiding principles through interviews with community leaders and property owners as well as creation of two possible future land use scenarios based on the guiding principles. City of Coconut Creek, Florida, Complete Streets Master Plan, FL. Project Manager. Vikas led TYLI team in developing a Complete Streets implementation plan for the City of Coconut Creek that will serve as the basis for updating the City’s comprehensive plan and land development regulations. Major corridors in the City were analyzed to identify bike/ped improvement needs and develop proposed typical sections based on Broward County Complete Street Guidelines and “best practices.” Lake Ridge Neighborhood Mobility Master Plan, Fort Lauderdale, FL. Project Manager. PM for Masterplan for multimodal transportation improvements that is anticipated to include an investment of $26 million over the next 10+ years. Multimodal improvements include operational strategies to improve traffic flow, Complete Streets projects, traffic calming improvements, bicycle and pedestrian mobility and accessibility improvements as well as address safety issues. This effort includes building consensus for project recommendations and help unify the community on transportation related issues and concerns as well as community’s vision. Integrated Bikeway/Walkway System Feasibility Study, City of Tamarac, FL. Planner. for the assessment of existing conditions and identification of potential economic benefits for the City that may have resulted from the implementation of a bikeway system. The study required extensive public involvement and a feasibility study was conducted for different types of bikeways/walkways. Responsible for a demographic analysis using GIS to identify bike/pedestrian markets and cost-benefit analysis. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 30 PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) #020097, 2005 Certified Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Professional #00057880, 2008 EDUCATION Master of City and Regional Planning, Clemson University, 2003 Master of Planning (Specialization in Housing), School of Planning, Center for Environmental Planning and Technology (CEPT), India, 2000 Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Technology, School of Building Science & Technology (SBST), CEPT, India, 1998 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) MEAGHAN L. CAPUANO, PE Traffic Engineer – Traffic Operations Ms. Capuano has 17 years of traffic engineering and transportation planning experience working in both the public and private sectors. She specializes in multimodal traffic modeling, traffic signal system operations, capacity analysis, traffic calming, traffic signal design, intelligent transportation system (ITS) design, roundabout design, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, highway lighting, and traffic signal energy management. Her prior experience includes owning and operating CAP Traffic Engineering, Inc. a certified Woman-owned DBE firm. She managed traffic impact studies and bicycle/ pedestrian safety studies primarily in South Florida. Ms. Capuano also worked for the Monroe County Department of Transportation in Rochester, NY, where she became proficient in traffic signal system operations as well as led a traffic operations incident management team. From 2002-2007, Ms. Capuano worked for TYLI (formally FRA Engineering) performing traffic impact studies for various site developments, highway, and planning projects for public and private agencies. Career highlights include being named the Young Transportation Professional of the Year by the Upstate NY Section of the Institute of Transportation Engineers in 2012. In addition, she has efficiently designed several traffic signal timing and coordination network plans including corridors with diverging diamond interchanges. Ms. Capuano is proficient using the traffic modeling software Synchro, SimTraffic, Synchro 3D Viewer, HCS7, CORSIM, and FDOT LOSPLAN 2012. She has operated and programed a TransCore central traffic signal system and Econolite traffic signal controllers.. Miami-Dade County Airport System, 42nd Court Extension, Miami, FL. Traffic Engineer. Ms. Capuano performed traffic simulation and LOS capacity analysis for the extension/re- routing of 42nd Court from 14th Street to NW 13th street. She developed a Synchro and SimTraffic model for the project area consisting of five intersections for existing and future build conditions including three alternatives. Ms. Capuano designed the signal timings and coordination according to MUTCD standard including pedestrian accommodations. Pines Flamingo Center Turn Overpass (CTO), Pembroke Pines, FL. Traffic Engineer. Traffic Engineer for a site-specific conceptual design solution for the intersection of Pines Boulevard and Flamingo Road to lay out a center turn overpass interchange (CTO). The project included identifying locations where the ramps began and ended, consideration for access to adjacent land, impacts to merge and weave requirements, right-of-way requirements, and aesthetic considerations. Ms. Capuano was responsible for the operational analysis performed for three peak hour scenarios for before and after conditions as well as two future conditions using Synchro and SimTraffic modeling software. In addition, she developed the signal timings for both the elevated and at-grade traffic signals, performed a vehicle queue analysis, and prepared the technical memorandum for the Broward County MPO/ On-Call Traffic and Transportation Engineering Services, City of Fort Lauderdale, FL. Traffic Engineer. TYLI provides on-call traffic and transportation engineering services to the City of Fort Lauderdale. Ms. Capuano has assisted the City on a variety of task orders that have included analysis of traffic impacts from planned developments, parking studies, walkability design, and Complete Streets planning and implementation. She also assisted YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 17 PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer FL #77127 EDUCATION BS in Civil Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY, 2002 Civil Engineering 3+2 Program, SUNY Potsdam, NY, 2000 PROFESSIONALAFFILIATIONS Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) NY Upstate Section President, 2012 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) in development of a Mobility Master Plan for the Lake Ridge community that encompassed the vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle modes of transportation. Traffic Study for Oceanside Veterinary Center, Delray Beach, FL. Project Manager. Traffic study for a new 1,434-square foot veterinary center to be located on US 1 Federal Highway in Delray Beach, Florida. The study also included an existing 1,230-square foot professional office building which shares the parking area on the site. Ms. Capuano was responsible for all aspects of the traffic study including the initial proposal, scope of work, budget, trip generation, Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Analysis, and report writing for County approval. Georgia DOT SR 35 FM Ferry Lake Road (Tift County) to Stump Creek (Irwin County), Tift County and Irwin County, GA. Traffic Engineer.SR 35 transverses north to south and is comprised of one lane in each direction. The study encompasses a five-mile area and investigates potential locations for truck passing lanes from Ferry Lake Road to Stump Creek. Within the project limits, the land along the corridor is comprised primarily of vacant agricultural land with some residential development. As Traffic Engineer, Ms. Capuano developed the micro simulation models that incorporated existing traffic volumes and future traffic projections along the corridor using Synchro modeling software. In addition, she performed an accident analysis along the corridor. SR 14 at Abandoned CXS Railroad, Georgia DOT, West Atlanta, Fulton County, GA. Traffic Engineer. TYLI prepared a traffic methodology document for GDOT for a segment of SR 14 that is primarily industrial and commercial land uses and transverses north to south consisting of two lanes in each direction. As the Traffic Engineer, Ms. Capuano analyzed the existing traffic count data and provided various summary figures for the traffic forecasting study. In addition, she performed an accident analysis along the corridor. SR 369 Passing Lanes, Forsyth County, GA. Traffic Engineer. SR 369 is a two-lane urban minor arterial running east-west and connects Cherokee County to Forsyth County. The 5.0-mile project area includes adding passing/truck lanes on two or three locations from the Cherokee County Line to Wallace Tatum Road. Within the project limits, the corridor is primarily residential with a few industrial businesses. Ms. Capuano was the Traffic Engineer and developed the micro simulation models that incorporated existing traffic volumes and future traffic projections along the corridor using Synchro modeling software. In addition, she performed an accident analysis along the corridor. . Meaghan Capuano, PE Traffic Engineer – Traffic Operations Cont’d. 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) KRIS A. CELLA Public Involvement Ms. Cella is uniquely qualified in developing and implementing very successful, comprehensive large-scale public involvement programs during planning, design and construction phases for infrastructure projects. Ms. Cella’s expertise in conducting public involvement programs is successfully used to gain acceptance of new projects from affected individuals and special interest groups. Projects have ranged from new developments to facility expansion programs to large-scale transportation projects. Golden Gate Design/Build Phase 1 and 2, Collier County, Florida – Public Information Project Manager for these design/build projects on Golden Gate Boulevard from Wilson Boulevard to Everglades Boulevard to widen the roadway to four lanes. Elements of the projects included flyer preparation and public meetings. In addition, notices were delivered to property owners along the corridor to inform them of upcoming work. A telephone hotline provides residents direct access to get their question and comments to the project team. Naples Lakes Improvement Project, City of Naples, Florida - Public involvement for developing design plans for three lakes, 15th Avenue Lake, Spring Lake and East Lake. The project will improve the water quality of the lakes and reduce nutrients discharging into the bay. The project included a website with a video to educate the public on the elements of the project. City of Naples Stormwater Master Plan Updated, City of Naples, Florida – This project to update the Stormwater Master Plan included two public workshops. Elements of the public involvement program included flyers, media releases, advertisements, and a slide show. US 41 & SR/CR 951 Project Development and Environment Study Reevaluation, Collier County, Florida – Task manager for the Public Involvement Program for Collier County’s reevaluation study to determine capacity improvements for the US 41 & SR/CR 951 intersection in Collier County. Responsibilities included coordinating all aspects of the Public Involvement Program including newsletters, workshops and a public hearing. US 41 Project Development and Environment Study, Collier County, Florida – Task manager for the Public Involvement Program for the Florida Department of Transportation’s study to widen US 41 from CR 951/Collier Boulevard to CR 92/San Marco Road in Collier County. Responsibilities included coordinating all aspects of the Public Involvement Program including newsletters, workshops and a public hearing. Collier County Long Range Transportation Plan 2030 Update, Collier County, Florida - Project Manager for the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization’s public involvement program process that provided citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, freight shippers, private providers of transportation, representatives of users of public transit, providers of freight transportation services, and other interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the proposed plan. In addition, a LRTP Steering Committee was established to give interested citizens a more active role in the plan update. The program included multi-lingual small group/community meetings, public information workshops, speakers’ bureau, event attendance, web site, public opinion surveys, newsletters, etc. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 30 EDUCATION B.A., Geography (emphasis in regional land developments), University of Arizona, 1979 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) JUSTIN R. COONER, PE Transportation Engineer/Planner Mr. Cooner has a background established in transportation, Mr. Cooner has contributed to the engineering field in both the public and private sectors for the past 9 years. His experience with field assessments of traffic conditions has been vital in reducing crash trends at numerous signalized intersections. As an in-house consultant for FDOT District 2, Mr. Cooner was an integral part of the highway safety team. His services have helped to incorporate newly adopted complete street standards for projects in North Florida. FDOT District 5 Community Traffic Safety Contract 2016 – 2018 Serving as project engineer, Mr. Cooner was responsible for field data collection and observations, and recommendations safety for improvements. Benefit-cost ratios for each recommendation were developed. This contract spanned 3 years and included more than 10 intersections in Brevard, Volusia, and Lake Counties. FDOT District 2 Districtwide Road Safety Audits 2015 - 2018 Mr. Cooner collected and reviewed vehicle crash data and pedestrian crash data for over 40 corridors that are candidates for resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation (RRR) projects in FDO District 2. He performed road safety audits which included crash data and trends summaries, identification of issues, and close collaboration with FDOT, local transit authorities, and local law enforcement staff. FDOT District 2 Traffic Safety Studies In-House Consultant Services 2018 Mr. Cooner provided in-house support to the Traffic Operations division on a variety of safety-related tasks. His primary role was to develop maintenance work orders based upon the recommendations in completed safety reports. Each work order was developed in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Standards (MUTCD) and was delivered to the area maintenance office for each location. Work orders include the size and placement of all recommended roadway signs and pavement markings. GDOT District 1 Widening of GA State Route 347 2006 – 2008 Working in Microstation and GeoPak, Mr. Cooner developed signing and marking plans for 10 miles of GA State Route 347 (Friendship Rd). The plans included a widening from 2 lanes undivided to 4 lanes divided. GDOT District 1 GA 400 at SR 53 Interchange, Dawson County, GA 2006 – 2008 Mr. Cooner served as a project traffic design engineer for complete design of signing and marking, and maintenance of traffic plans. FDOT International Speedway Blvd (ISB) Corridor Master Plan 2015 – 2016 Mr. Cooner was integral with the review of 8.1 miles of US 92/International Speedway Blvd (ISB) in Volusia County, FL. He managed the data collection effort including addressing land use, crash history, signal timing, and planned improvements. The master plan included prioritized recommendations, Mr. Cooner verified that master plan improvements were consistent with the current Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) from the River2Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO).Each recommendation in the plan was analyzed for Benefit-Costs effectiveness, which was an effort in which he held a key role in. . YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 9 PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer FL #77444 EDUCATION BS Civil Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2007 MS Civil Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009 AFFILIATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers Institute of Transportation Engineers 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) JESSICA DIMMICK, PE AICP Senior Engineer/Planner Ms. Dimmick is a project manager in a variety of transportation and land use planning, engineering, and design projects. She excels in projects that integrate high level community visioning with technical feasibility analysis. Her experience includes multimodal corridor planning, traffic and safety analysis, integrated transportation and land use planning, and public involvement. Complete Streets Implementation Plan – City of Deerfield Beach, Florida. Ms. Dimmick managed an implementation plan to transform Deerfield Beach’s existing roadways into “complete streets” that support the City’s smart growth, healthy lifestyles, safety, livability, and sustainability objectives, and that accommodate the all transportation modes. She and her team facilitated a workshop with City staff to develop a network vision and design recommendations for four initial corridors, including road diets, pedestrian crossing enhancements, on- and off-road bicycle paths, and strategic access improvements to parks and recreational facilities. (while with Renaissance Planning Group) Riverside Drive Corridor Improvement Study – VDOT. The Riverside Drive Corridor Improvement Study, examined safety and access spacing issues and recommended installing sidewalks and crosswalks, implementing Restricted Crossing U-Turns, and reconfiguring ramps to improve safety. Ms. Dimmick managed a team to produce design drawings, develop cost estimates, and prepare project summary sheets for use in SMART SCALE and other funding applications. Freight Roadway Design Considerations – Florida Department of Transportation, District Seven. Ms. Dimmick developed design strategies to guide roadway engineers in the design of transportation facilities that recognize the often-conflicting functions of freight mobility and community livability. She coordinated with urban and graphic designers to propose prototypical design solutions and provide specific guidance for various intersection and cross-section elements. She compiled an extensive literature review on freight resources, including the FDOT Plans Preparations Manual and FDOT PD&E Manual. (while with Renaissance) Multimodal Transportation Master Plan – City of Norfolk, VA. Ms. Dimmick is leading the development of a Multimodal Norfolk – a transportation master plan for the City of Norfolk. The plan will identify multimodal centers, designate multimodal through and placemaking corridors with pedestrian, bicycle, and transit emphasis, and provide typical cross-sections. EPR is also developing a standalone city-wide bicycle and pedestrian plan and recommendations for crosswalks, freight movement, and parking and curbside management strategies. The plan will include a multimodal transportation needs assessment and program of projects for implementation. Public engagement includes multiple rounds of public meetings, stakeholder workshops, and on-board surveys. I-95 Corridor Mobility Planning Project – Florida Department of Transportation, District Four. Ms. Dimmick managed this project, which addresses congestion on I-95 and broader mobility and land use issues in eastern Broward and southeastern Palm Beach counties in a holistic way. She developed a framework of transportation facility types and land use place types that defines the functions of these facilities and places within the broader transportation and land use system. Using adopted future land use plans and YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 12 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer VA #0402057203 American Institute of Certified Planners #027519 EDUCATION Master of Urban and Environmental Planning, University of Virginia Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Lafayette College PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Women’s Transportation Seminar, Central Virginia Chapter American Planning Association, Virginia Chapter At-Large Board Member, Palm Beach County Planning Congress, 2015 - 2016 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) other previous planning efforts, she combined the future population and employment forecasts with future land use, and transit development plans to create a network vision for the transportation system. Ms. Dimmick facilitated meetings where various planning partners discussed the future vision, refined the project’s objectives, and developed strategies and indicators to measure success. She developed a robust set of strategies and performance measures for various stakeholders, and facilitated workshops with agencies and local governments. (while with Renaissance Planning Group) Multimodal System Design Guidelines – DRPT. Ms. Dimmick held a lead role in the development of DRPT’s Multimodal System Design Guidelines, and she is managing the 2020 Update, currently underway. The Guidelines provide a process for holistic multimodal planning at regional, local, and corridor scales, tailored to the Virginia context, and based on the latest guidance from AASHTO, FHWA, NACTO, ITE, CNU, and VDOT. Ms. Dimmick’s team developed a methodology for designing connected networks for all modes within a region that correlate to surrounding land uses and density, and show how to make design tradeoffs in constrained rights-of-way. US 501/US 221 Intersection Improvements Project – City of Lynchburg, VA. Fast population growth and commercial development have resulted in congestion at the intersection of two principal arterials that is increasing crashes, affecting emergency response times, blocking driveways, and reaching capacity limits. Ms. Dimmick led the documentation of the traffic analysis results, including public meeting display boards with graphically rich, easily understandable diagrams and written reports emphasizing clarity of concepts. Downtown Master Plan Update – City of Norfolk, VA. EPR is developing a Multimodal System Plan for Norfolk’s downtown area. Ms. Dimmick analyzed multimodal facility and safety data and worked with a team to designate multimodal corridors that form connected networks for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit. She presented the information to a steering committee of business leaders and downtown residents. She worked with a team to develop concepts for five demonstration projects, including intersection redesigns, shared bicycle-bus lanes, and other interventions to improve the multimodal environment. Mid-Block Crossing Study – City of Lynchburg, VA. Local businesses approached the City of Lynchburg to request marked crosswalks and additional protective features for pedestrians at two currently uncontrolled locations. Ms. Dimmick led this study, which included researching mid-block crossing treatments and application guidance from VDOT, FHWA, ITE, NACTO, AASHTO, and localities across the country. She analyzed vehicle speeds, pedestrian volumes, and crash histories. She assessed the feasibility of various treatments and recommended advance stop bars, raised crosswalks, signage, and lighting. Mixed Use & Multimodal Connectivity around the Innovation Park & Gainesville VRE Stations – Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. An existing freight rail line presents fast-growing Prince William County with an opportunity to envision passenger rail service in the future. Ms. Dimmick led an analysis of multimodal connectivity and readiness for compact, walkable, transit-supportive mixed-use development within three potential station areas. The analysis included policy, political, physical, socio-economic, and market aspects. Recommendations for implementation revolved around corridor and station area evolution to build transit demand through land use and economic development. Jessica Dimmick, PE AICP Senior Engineer/Planner Cont. 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) QIAN (CHERRY) XIONG, PE Support Disciplines – Viswalk (Bike/Ped) Micro-Simulation Ms. Xiong has over 18 years of experience in transportation planning and multimodal microsimulation in the US, Canada, and around the world. Her principal expertise is in travel demand forecasting, transit ridership forecasting and operations planning, transport hub planning and pedestrian modeling, traffic/revenue study and software training. Ms. Xiong is active in Transportation Planning Research communities and has also published and presented multiple technical papers. The Port Authority Bus Terminal Replacement Simulation Model Development Review/Oversight, New York, NY. Technical Advisor. Working as the Port Authority’s technical advisor and VISSIM simulation modeling expert and reviewing the simulation model that is being developed by consultant. Conducting thorough review and identify errors and providing suggestions on how to improve the model setup to better represent pedestrian behavior in reality. Sutphin-Archer Blvd. Station Enhancement Feasibility Study, New York, NY. Lead Passenger Flow Analyst. Ms. Xiong is leading the passenger flow analysis to support feasibility study, preliminary engineering design and the final design for the Enhancement of Sutphin-Archer Station Interconnections to the LIRR/AirTrain Terminal Complex in Jamaica Queens. High-resolution 3D pedestrian models are being developed to analyze all design alternatives and provide feedback to architects and structural design team for design optimization purpose. The model will also help with the development of construction phasing plan to minimize the negative impact on passengers. Based on the pedestrian modeling results the concepts will be developed and vetted for most optimal and constructible option. Tocumen International Airport, Roadways, Civil and Utilities Design, Landside Airport Engineer Panama City, Panama. Ms. Xiong led the efforts to perform traffic analysis for related landside multimodal transportation facilities. Ms. Xiong developed a VISSIM simulation model for the area in front of the terminal main entrance. Interactions between vehicles and passengers crossing streets were fully modeled. Statistics such as average travel speed, delays and queueing were estimated for both vehicles and pedestrians based on various signal control methods (fixed timing, pedestrian activated signal control and unsignalized) according to MUTCD standard. Multimodal Corridor Enhancement TIGER VI Grant Project, Champaign-Urbana, IL. Transit Operations/ Travel Demand Model/ Micro-Simulation Specialist. Ms. Xiong provided transit support for improvements in Champaign-Urbana, IL. Used macro-micro integration approach to understand existing and future year travel pattern of all modes in the study area. Performed alternative analysis using high resolution micro-simulation to show how bus-only lanes may improve efficiency and suggested operations improvements at segment and intersection level. Used simulations of vehicles, bikes and pedestrians to support implementation of complete street concept. Downtown Atlanta Bus Circulation study, Atlanta, GA. Microsimulation Modeler and Traffic Engineer. Ms. Xiong served as lead VISUM modeler and developed downtown Atlanta area travel demand model from ARC’s regional travel demand model. The study area was first defined based on the project boundary. Zones were disaggregated. The network was refined, and detailed centroid connectors were added based on field check YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 18 PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer MD #36068 EDUCATION Master of Science, Civil Engineering specializing in Transportation Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2002 Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, P.R. China, 1997 PROFESSIONALAFFILIATIONS Member -- TRB Committee on Intermodal Transfer Facilities- AP045 Member -- TRB Committee on Public Transportation Planning and Development- AP025 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Miscellaneous Professional Services CN 2020-01 SARA GUTEKUNST Environmental Scientist/GIS Specialist Ms. Gutekunst has several years of experience working as an environmental consultant in South Florida. She has a strong background in science and research. She has experience in the planning, design, and permitting of environmental projects and her capabilities include wetland jurisdictional determinations, environmental feasibility studies, benthic resource surveys, environmental permitting, mitigation design and monitoring, endangered and threated species surveys, and GIS analysis. Sara’s experience includes the following related projects: Atlantic Boulevard Relocation and Higgs Beach Renourishment, Key West: Sara served as an environmental scientist for the relocation of Atlantic Boulevard and the renourishment of Higgs Beach in Key West. The project included the realignment of Atlantic Boulevard from Reynolds Street to White Street and associated drainage system improvements. The project also includes the placement of sand on Higgs Beach for renourishment. Sara was responsible for preparing and processing environmental permit applications for the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), and the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Sara also coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to ensure requirements were met for sea turtle lighting fixtures. Heron Bay Development, Parkland: Sara served as a project biologist for the Heron Bay Development mitigation project. The Heron Bay Development project included the design, permitting and monitoring of two wetland mitigation areas within a residential community. Sara was responsible for performing quarterly monitoring and preparing reports for the USACE, SFWMD and the Broward County Environmental Protection and Growth Management Department. Miami Marine Stadium, Miami: Sara served as an environmental scientist for the Miami Marine Stadium project in Miami. The project included replacement of a boat ramp and installation of floating docks. Sara was responsible for preparing a mitigation plan and coordinating with the USACE and FDEP. Sara also coordinated with the City of Miami Police Department Marine Patrol in coordination of derelict vessel removal for associated seagrass mitigation. Port Everglades Turning Notch Expansion, Broward County: Sara served as a project biologist for the Port Everglades Turning Notch Expansion project. The wetland enhancement project included the creation of a 16.5-acre wetland enhancement area related to the release of a portion of an existing 8-acre conservation easement that will allow Port Everglades to expand the Southport Turning Notch. Sara was responsible for conducting mitigation monitoring of the wetland enhancement area and preparing monitoring reports for the USACE, the FDEP, and the Broward County Environmental and Growth Management Division. 3 Harborage Isle Drive, Fort Lauderdale: Sara served as a project manager for the permitting of 3 Harborage Isle Drive. The project included the repair and installation of approximately 1,000 linear feet of dock and seawall at a residential property. Sara was responsible for conducting a benthic resource survey and preparing a report, preparing and submitting applications to the USACE, FDEP, and the Broward County Environmental Protection and Growth Management Department. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 7 EDUCATION BS, Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Coral gables, FL, 2013 CERTIFICATIONS/TRAINING ArcGIS, AutoCAD LT Florida Stormwater, Erosion and Sedimentation Control Inspector Trimble American Red Cross CPR, AED and First Aid Microsoft Office; Intuit QuickBooks Florida Aquatic Species Collection NAUI Rescue Diver SSI Open Water SCUBA US Sailing Association Sailing Instructor 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) THOMAS A. ERRICO, PE Transportation Planning – Complete Streets, Bike/Ped Thomas Errico joined T.Y. Lin International as a senior associate and New England traffic engineering director. His background in traffic engineering includes access management, corridor studies, traffic operations studies, pedestrian studies, parking studies, safety evaluations, and traffic impact studies. He has significant experience in designing traffic signals, developing and maintaining traffic plans, and determining intersection and roadway design requirements for highway projects, including auxiliary lanes, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, signing, and traffic control. He has worked extensively with traffic engineering software such as SYNCHRO, SimTraffic, HCS, TRANSYT-7F, PASSER, and CORSIM. Mr. Errico has served as Project Manager/Lead Traffic Engineer for a variety of design and study projects for municipal and state agency clients. Martin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Action Plan, Martin County, FL. Lead Complete Streets Engineer. Mr. Errico assisted in the development of bicycle and pedestrian improvements in Martin County. As part of this effort, he led a stakeholder workshop and training seminar on Complete Streets. Palm Beach MPO Complete Streets Workshop, FL. Complete Streets Instructor. In association with the National Complete Street Coalition, Mr. Errico instructed a full day Complete Street workshop to Palm Beach MPO member communities. City of Coconut Creek Complete Streets Plan, City of Coconut Creek, FL. Transportation Engineer. Mr. Errico provided technical expertise as it related to roadway cross-section recommendations for multi-modal improvements. City of Fort Lauderdale Traffic and Transportation Engineering Contract, City of Fort Lauderdale, FL. Traffic Engineer. Mr. Errico provides traffic engineering support for on- going projects including the review of traffic impact studies for development applications. Broward County Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Action Plan, Broward County MPO, Broward County, FL. Senior Traffic Engineer. Mr. Errico is serving as Senior Traffic Engineer assisting with bicycle and pedestrian crash analysis using ArcGIS software package to identify hot spot zones and recommend appropriate safety countermeasures. On-Call Traffic Engineering Services for the City of Portland, ME. Traffic Engineer. Responsible for providing technical assistance on a host of traffic related tasks including development reviews (for large developments including the Packard Shopping Center and the Ocean Gateway project), traffic support for construction projects, neighborhood traffic management, traffic calming, traffic signalization design, pedestrian accommodations, and general traffic engineering tasks. Mr. Errico is a member of the City’s Pedestrian Crosswalk Committee and provides technical guidance on bicycle and pedestrian issues. Pensacola Bay Bridge Design-Build Project, FDOT, Pensacola, FL. Lead Traffic Engineer. Mr. Errico provided technical design support as it relates to intersection design configurations for the project. North Portland Complete Streets Plan, Falmouth, Yarmouth, Cumberland, and Freeport, ME – PACTS. Project Manager. Responsible for evaluating and studying the multi-modal deficiencies and needs for transportation in portions of the Route 1 corridor in the towns of Falmouth, Cumberland, Yarmouth and Freeport. Four communities want to YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 34 PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer ME #6618 VT #6321 NH #10096 MA #37701 EDUCATION MS in Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, 1996 BS in Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, 1985 CERTIFICATIONS Certified Maine DOT Locally Administered Project Manager 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) create a multi-modal “Complete Street” plan for a portion of the Route 1 Corridor, which is approximately 12-mile long. Bangor Area Comprehensive Transportation System (BACTS) Pedestrian and Bicycle Long-Range Plan (2018–2019), Maine DOT, ME. Project Manager. Responsible for the development of the BACTS 2045 Regional [Pedestrian and Bicycle] Transportation Plan. 21st Century Downtown Master Plan, Town of Windham, North Windham, ME. Project Manager/Lead Traffic Engineer. Responsible for the development of the 21st Century Downtown Master Plan. The plan’s purpose was to develop a comprehensive vision for transportation improvements in North Windham. The plan was awarded “2014 Plan of the Year” by the Maine Association of Planners. Complete Streets Plan, Saco and Scarborough, ME – PACTS. Project Manager. Responsible for evaluating and studying the multi-modal deficiencies and needs for transportation in portions of the Route 1 corridor in the communities of Saco and Scarborough. Both communities want to create a multi-modal “Complete Street” plan for a portion of the Route 1 Corridor, from Downtown Saco to South Portland. Complete Streets Design Training Initiative, Statewide, MA – University of Massachusetts, MA. Project Manager. Responsible for the development and delivery of approximately 60 training/workshops throughout the state of Massachusetts. The workshops attendees included MassDOT engineers, consultants, and municipal staff. Anderson Street Neighborhood By-Way Project, City of Portland, ME. Project Manager. Responsible for designing improvements that incorporate improved bicycle, pedestrian and streetscape enhancements between Fox Street and Plowman Street. Suffolk County Complete Streets Workshop, New York In association with the National Complete Street Coalition, NY. Complete Streets Instructor. Mr. Errico instructed a full day Complete Street workshop to Suffolk MPO member communities.. . THOMAS ERRICO, PE(CONT’D) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RICHARD PERRIN, AICP Transportation Planning – Performance Measures Mr. Perrin manages TYLI’s large-scale planning and transportation projects across the company and assists clients’ critical transportation infrastructure needs by identifying funding and implementing outcome-based management. Mr. Perrin has nationally- recognized experience in successfully creating and implementing inventive solutions to meet the economic, land use, and environmental needs of diverse stakeholders through transportation projects and programs. He has a proven ability to develop, assess, and continuously improve an organizational operating model and related policy, planning, and investment decision-making activities to ensure limited resources are used cost-effectively and result in efficient product delivery. Well-regarded throughout the transportation and planning industry, Mr. Perrin has provided testimony to the U.S. House of Representatives’ Highways and Transit Subcommittee and input to the Senate Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee on federal transportation policy and the need for additional investment in all forms of infrastructure. He is also a highly-coveted speaker at local, state, and federal conferences. Perrin most recently presented at the New York State County Superintendents Association’s Winter Conference and at the annual conference of the Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations. Mr. Perrin brings a unique skill set to TYLI. His talents and experience include project management, organizational vision and management, strategic planning and implementation, operations and revenue optimization, capital programming and project tracking, and agency, community, and media relations.. Genesee Transportation Council, Rochester, NY. Executive Director. Mr. Perrin was responsible for directing and managing activities related to federally-funded transportation policy, planning, and investment decision-making in the nine-county Genesee-Finger Lakes Region, which includes the Rochester, NY, metropolitan area. •Created and implemented a cost-effective staff operating model that results in all federal metropolitan transportation planning requirements being met with approximately 55 percent of the funds provided by the Federal Highway and Transit Administrations, allowing revenues to be used for value-added activities that are tailored to regional transportation opportunities and issues. •Developed performance measure-based, data-driven capital programming procedures to formalize project solicitation, evaluation, selection, and modification, as well as performed a thorough project delivery review that identified opportunities for sponsors to control costs. •Directly managed the development of regional freight and intelligent transportation systems plans from the proposal stages to the final products. •Positioned the organization to proactively meet updated and proposed planning requirements resulting from emerging national and state regulations, policies, and directives in a manner meaningful to the region. •Crafted and executed communications strategies (including message development and earned media) that provided positive exposure to the organization and its member agencies. •Identified appropriate training and professional development opportunities to expand the technical abilities of staff and increase organizational capacity. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 21 PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer FL #49237 EDUCATION Transportation Executive Program, The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, 2009 Master of Urban Planning, Economic Development Specialization, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1998 BA in Sociology, St. John Fisher College, 1996 PROFESSIONALAFFILIATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association- Finger Lakes Section – Treasurer 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) As Program Manager with the Genesee Transportation Council, Mr. Perrin developed a Long-Range Transportation Plan and economic development and air quality-related transportation planning and programming activities. •Managed the development of the Long-Range Transportation Plan for the nine-county region which included the transition from a project-based plan to a strategic vision plan. •Expanded multi-modal freight analysis capabilities and instituted industrial access planning. •Developed a framework for and guided the organization through the Clean Air Act which required conformity process as a newly-designated ozone non-attainment area. Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council – Rochester, NY. In his role as Regional Planner and Associate Planner, Mr. Perrin was responsible for the management of projects, technical analyses, and production of reports pertaining to land use, economic development, and water quality planning. Specifically, he: •Conducted economic and fiscal impact modeling and analyses of economic development, and transportation projects. •Provided technical assistance and research/information services to state, regional, county, and city planning and economic development agencies. •Acted as lead consultant in the design, development, and production of municipal flood mitigation action plan and general aviation airport land use plan. Specific examples of his experience include: Long Range Transportation Plan for the Genesee-Finger Lakes Region: 2035. The LRTP 2035 identifies the vision and direction for the Genesee-Finger Lakes Region’s surface transportation system and serves as the framework for future investments. The region has a population and workforce greater than eight states and is located within the Regional Plan Association’s Great Lakes Mega-Region. The LRTP 2035 assesses existing and projected transportation system capabilities, needs, and objectives and provides a fiscally-constrained set of recommended strategies to meet these objectives. In addition, it includes a meaningful set of performance metrics with associated baseline measures and desired changes for each to track future progress towards the plan’s goals. The LRTP 2035 was developed with significant input from residents, businesses, and community organizations, and was written in a manner discernible to residents, elected officials, and other non-technical stakeholders.. Richard Perrin, AICP Transportation Planning Performance Measures Cont. New York State Association of Traffic Engineers Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (National) –President, 2014 - 2015 Transportation Research Board – Metropolitan Policy, Planning, and Processes Committee – 2007-2015 New York State Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations – Chairman, 2010- 2015 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Miscellaneous Professional Services CN 2020-01 ADRIANO I. FOTI, PE Senior Roadway Engineer Mr. Foti has 28 years of highway design experience and has designed many complex highway projects in Florida at both the planning and final stages. His expertise includes geometric designs, signing, striping, lighting, traffic engineering, traffic control plans, typical section definition, cost estimates, traffic and geometric concepts analysis and design. Adriano is also the author of various traffic reports and documents covering Resurfacing, Restoration and Rehabilitation (RRR) of highways and Preliminary Engineering Reports as part of Project Development and Environment Studies (PD&E). His participation in special projects include the Central Florida Lynx LRT and design build / Public Private Partnership (PPP) Design-Build projects such as the I-595 and SR 836 primary limited access corridors in South Florida. Mr. Foti also leads our highway special designs and innovations group, having introduced the first two Diverging Diamond Interchanges in South Florida. SR 836 Design Build between NW 57 Ave and NW 17 Ave, Miami-Dade County; Deputy Project Manager/ EOR Roadway Designer. The SR 836-28 project is a 5-mile urban limited access highway with 6 service interchanges to major arterials connecting the Miami airport to downtown Miami. Special features included future express bus lanes/bus on shoulder (BOS) transit, future express tolled lanes, two Diverging Diamond Interchanges (DDI) the first ones in South Florida, airport glide path accommodation and coordination with MDAD/FAA. SR 826 Palmetto Expwy Segment 5 between NW 42 Ave to NW 32 Ave FDOT District 6 Senior Designer/Reviewer. This is a 1-mile segment of limited access freeway widening and addition of express toll lanes in the median. It included interchanges with reconfiguration and capacity upgrades. Frontage roads were reconstructed and widened to match the existing access points. SW 157 Avenue between SW 152 Street and SW 184 Street, Miami-Dade County; Project Manager. Reconstruction of 2.2 miles of urban arterial from two lanes per direction to a four lane arterial with median and turning lanes. US 1 Biscayne Boulevard between NE 13 Street and NE 38 Street, Miami; Project Manager Lead Designer. Planning and reconstruction project of a two-mile segment of an urban major arterial north of downtown Miami. The project included the addition of decorative sidewalks, specialty landscape and streetscape. Arch Creek Bike Path (NE 135 Street from US 1 to Florida International University) Miami; Project Manager. Addition of a bike lane and the opening of a shared use path through a sensitive residential community. Intensive public involvement and community awareness was incorporated. City of Fort Lauderdale; Sistrunk Boulevard between US 1 and 27 Avenue, Fort Lauderdale; Project Manager. Planning and re-construction project of a 2.5-mile segment of urban minor arterial. Project included the addition of sidewalks, lighting, streetscape and landscape. SR 80 between Florida Turnpike and Haverhill Boulevard, Palm Beach; Project Manager. An urban major eight-lane arterial with overpass. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 28 PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer FL #49938 EDUCATION MSCE, Transportation Florida International University, 1994 BSCE, Civil Engineering UACA, 1989 CERTIFICATIONS/TRAINING Certified FDOT MOT 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) JAMES A. ERIKSEN, PE Transit Planning – Capital Cost With over 30 years of experience in both transit and highway projects, Mr. Eriksen has served as department manager, project manager, and senior engineer. He has been responsible for all aspects of project development from establishing pursuits through award and on to final plans, cost estimates and construction services for both design-bid-build and design-build projects. General Engineering Contract, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA), Pompano Beach, FL. Project Manager. TYLI has been responsible for various Work Orders under the General Engineering Contract (GEC) with SFRTA, including the following projects: Boca Raton Station – site and access lighting upgrades, West Palm Beach Station – Pedestrian Bridge Repair, Hialeah Yard – Fuel Line replacement, and AAF (Brightline) Miami Central Station – Review/Implementation of SFRTA interests as part of AAF’s overall station plan. Mr. Eriksen has been responsible for the management, oversight and coordination of the work performed along with contract management for the overall GEC efforts. Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority/South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA), Tri-County Commuter Rail, Relocation of the Miami International Airport (MIA) Station, Miami, FL. Deputy Project Manager/Design Manager. Provided all necessary professional, design, and engineering/architectural services for the relocation of the Tri-Rail Miami International Airport (MIA) Station and the design for an extension of track for the future extension of the rail line. The project scope included demolition (salvage plan), architectural, landscape architecture, civil, track work, signals, structural, mechanical, electrical, environmental, transportation, specifications writing, cost estimating, scheduling, value engineering, quality assurance and quality control, and project management. All Aboard Florida, Running Repair Facility in West Palm Beach FL and Vehicle Maintenance Facility in Orlando FL, Project Manager. Project Manager for the development of preliminary design, specifications and technical support for the preparation of design-build bridging documents for the new intercity passenger rail system’s West Palm Beach Running Repair Facility (RRF) and the final design development for the ultimate Vehicle Maintenance Facility (VMF) in Orlando. Mr. Eriksen was responsible for: coordination of the design team and contract management for the project along with client and various agency coordination. Pedestrian Overpasses at University Metrorail Station, Miami-Dade County, FL. Project Manager. Project Manager for the design of new pedestrian overpasses located along U.S. 1 at the University Metrorail Station. The proposed service advanced from the previous conceptual study phase (2006), and included design, public involvement activities, construction documents, technical specifications and preparation of the engineer's estimate of probable construction cost. The scope of work included coordination with affected agencies such as MDT, Miami-Dade Public Works, Building Department, Transportation Aesthetics Review Committee (TARC), Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), City of Coral Gables, the University of Miami and other permitting agencies. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 30+ PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer FL #50193 EDUCATION BS in Civil Engineering, University of Florida, 1988 PROFESSIONALAFFILIATIONS St. Stephen’s Day School, Board of Trustees Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce AWARDS Parsons Outstanding Achievement Award for Rail and Transit Systems Division, February 2008 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Miami Intermodal Center/Miami International Airport Connector Intermodal Center, Miami, FL. Deputy Design Manager. The approximate $259 million Miami International Airport (MIA) Automated People Mover (APM) system was delivered under a design-build- operate-maintain (DBOM) method. The approximate 1.3-mile APM system connects the Miami Intermodal Center (MIC) to the MIA main terminal. Mr. Eriksen was responsible for coordinating the design team, as well as the design/construction interface for the design- build process North Corridor Metrorail Extension, Miami-Dade Transit/Miami-Dade County, Preliminary Engineering, Miami, FL. Deputy Project Manager. This project involved final design of an elevated 9.5-mile extension of Miami-Dade Transit’s Metrorail system along 27th Avenue from Northwest 79th Street to the Miami-Dade/Broward County line. The project included 7 new passenger stations along with associated park and ride lots, as well as 8 new substations. Mr. Eriksen’s responsibilities included project management as well as direct facilities and systems design team intra-agency coordination, and FTA cost analysis. The agencies involved included: FTA, FTA’s Project Management Oversight Consultants, FDOT, Miami-Dade School Board, local municipalities, and community groups. The project team consisted of 10 sub-consultants as well as an internal staff of over 100 people. SR- 809 Military Trail, Palm Beach, FDOT District Four, Palm Beach County, FL. Project Manager. The reconstruction and widening of a 5-mile section of SR 809/Military Trail, from four to six lanes. Since the project was located in a dense urban area, maintenance-of-traffic and the utility design were essential elements of the design process. Mr. Eriksen was the project manager and engineer of record for the project that included 11 signalized intersection upgrades from span-wire to mast arm as well coordination with numerous school crossings and the signal pre-emption for the CSX rail crossing at Beeline Highway. Mr. Eriksen led the project from the initial phases of design through design coordination during construction. Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Austin Capital Metro Preliminary Engineering/Draft Environmental Impact, Austin, TX. Transit Project Engineer. Development of preliminary engineering plans and draft and final Environmental Impact Statements associated with the Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) of a light rail transit (LRT) system for the north, south, central, and southeast corridors in Austin, Texas. The study area was urban with 6.5 miles of LRT trackway in street medians. The remaining route was in an operating railroad right-of-way. Development of the LRT alignments required input and coordination with the traffic and roadway engineers. The design also evaluated the impact on right-of-way, utilities, drainage, station locations, historical sites, and other environmental concerns. Mr. Eriksen was responsible for civil engineering coordination and the design of preliminary track alignments and profiles. Metropolitan Transit Authority/ Harris County, Houston Light Rail Transit, Design/Build, Houston, TX. Senior Engineer. This design-build contract included the design and construction of four light rail transit corridors civil works components and associated transit systems. Mr. Eriksen was responsible for interagency coordination between TxDOT, Union Pacific Railroad, and Burlington Northern Railroad. Other tasks included Civil Package review of the design packages produced by local consultants as well as other civil related project coordination. James A. Eriksen, PE Transit Planning Capital Cost Cont. 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) BRIAN J. WERNER, PE Roadway Engineer Mr. Werner has twelve years of experience as a project engineer working on a wide variety of civil engineering projects. His design experience includes: highway/roadway, horizontal/vertical layout, stormwater management, drainage, grading, earthwork, lighting, utility design, erosion-sediment control, maintenance of traffic, signing and pavement marking, construction specifications, and construction estimates. He has worked in conventional Design-Bid-Build, Design-Build, and On-Call Service Contracts for Federal, State, and Municipal agencies as well as private enterprises. He is beginning to gain experience in Project Management.. Lee County Department of Transportation (LCDOT), Estero Boulevard Improvement Project, Town of Fort Myers Beach, Roadway Engineer. This project entailed conceptual design of the six mile arterial comprising the only continuous route on the island. Plans included implementation of “complete streets” concepts, bicycle friendly lanes and shoulders, mid block pedestrian crosswalk designs, and innovative trolley pulloffs/pullouts and stops. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Downtown Walkability Project. Project Engineer. In support of the City’s Downtown Walkability CIP, TY Lin prepared full design plans to improve pedestrian safety at five intersections and one mid-block crossing in Downtown Fort Lauderdale. TYLI also helped the City coordinate the project with the Downtown Fort Lauderdale Civic Association. Design options implemented were intended to slow vehicular speeds, enhance pedestrian traffic controls, markings and signage, improve sight distance, raise intersections and crossings, and other strategies where there’s a mix of extremely high pedestrian and vehicular volume, such as at Las Olas Boulevard and SE 4th Avenue, NE Third Avenue at NE 2nd Street, SE 2nd Street between SE Third and Fifth Avenues. City of Fort Lauderdale, NE 13th Street Complete Streets Project, Project Engineer. TYLI is preparing design plans, permitting and construction bid documents for NE 13th Street between NE 4th and NE 9th Avenues in the City of Fort Lauderdale’s. The design redevelops the minor arterial four-lane road into a Complete Street with the following features: reduce to two-lane road, replace travel lanes with bicycle lanes and on-street parking, introduce a roundabout at the intersection of NE 13th St. and NE 7th Ave. – remove traffic signal, provide landscaped medians, provide mid-block crossings, and incorporate native landscaping, tree canopies and statuary in the roundabout, along sidewalks and in curb extensions City of Marco Island, Smokehouse Bay Bridge, Marco Island, Florida; Civil Designer. Brian was responsible for creating the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) permit plans. He worked alongside the Senior Structural Engineer to draft the 30% structural details and plans. The City of Marco Island is removing and replacing the bridges on North Collier Boulevard over Smokehouse Bay with 114’ single span twin arch bridges. The new bridges will be elevated to allow for a pedestrian path underneath them linking the residential communities to the north to the recreational and shopping facilities to the south. (February 2010 – August 2012) YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 12 PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer FL #77650 EDUCATION BS, Civil Engineering, Purdue University, 2009 SOFTWARE PROFICIENCIES AutoCAD, Microstation, Microsoft Office, MathCAD, MATLAB, Storm Water Management Model (SWMM), SAP2000, Visual Professional Lighting Software 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) and aerial photos. The AM and PM peak hour demand were calibrated to link and turn counts. Detailed signal timing information was also added to the demand model for VISSIM micro-simulation preparation purpose. The model was then used for downtown area bus circulation study in a micro-simulation environment. South Florida Regional Transit Authority (SFRTA) Downtown Boca Raton Transit Feasibility Study, Palm Beach County, FL. Senior Transportation Planner and Ridership Forecast Task Leader. TYLI evaluated the feasibility of transit service in Downtown Boca Raton for South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA) and the City of Boca Raton. As part of this study, Ms. Xiong evaluated the alternative transit networks (downtown circulators and downtown-commuter rail connectors) and performed ridership forecasts according to service plans. Ultimately, TYLI staff prepared cost estimates and recommended a preferred alternative for the Downtown CRA Board for adoption and implementation purposes. Oakland Park Boulevard Transit Alternatives Analysis, Fort Lauderdale, FL. Traffic Engineer and Ridership Forecast Task Leader. Ms. Xiong performed transit ridership forecast for all alternatives. The results are key input to help evaluate transit alternatives that incorporate FDOT’s policies and program initiatives such as mobility hubs, passenger service, rapid bus/bus rapid transit (BRT), Light Rail and streetcar, and safety improvements to best enhance the transit operating environment in the busiest east-west bus route in Broward County, Florida. Identifying financial resources (FTA, FDOT, and local agencies) were addressed as well. Broward County MPO, Sistrunk Streetcar Ridership Forecasting, Fort Lauderdale, FL. Transit Ridership Modeling Specialist. Ms. Xiong developed a spreadsheet model to forecast the extension of the proposed WAVE streetcar Phase I under various alignment and operating scenarios to understand the magnitude of the additional ridership. Tasks performed included: 1) Aggregation of TAZs into districts based on streetcar extension alignment and catchment area, as well as the trip pattern; 2) development of district level trip tables based on the Southeast Florida Regional Planning Model (SERPM) highway and transit demand; 3) calibration of the spreadsheet model; and 4) application of the spreadsheet model to various alternatives. Sistrunk Boulevard Streetcar Feasibility Study Ridership Forecast, Fort Lauderdale, FL. Transit Ridership Forecasting Specialist. To help The City of Fort Lauderdale and the Northwest CRA to determine whether a streetcar service – an extension of the Downtown Wave streetcar project that is underway - would be feasible and/or viable. Prepared peak hour forecasts for three alignment alternatives and two operating plans using an Excel spreadsheet model. The spreadsheet model incorporated the data from the FDOT district travel demand model, the new economic development associated with a significant upzoning of the study area and also integrates the current fixed route and Community shuttle bus services. QIAN (CHERRY) XIONG, PE Support Disciplines Viswalk (Bike/Ped) Micro-Simulation Cont. 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ASHLYNN K. SUPER Public Involvement Ashlynn Super has 5 years of public involvement experience. She assists in preparation of company project team information for client bids and proposals. She provides assistance for public information projects including preparing newsletters, media releases, and advertisements. 2020 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update, City of Fort Myers, Lee County, FL. Public involvement specialist for the City of Fort Myers’ planning project to include updates to the 2007 Master Plan. Work consists of coordination with stakeholders, project team members, residents, and interested parties. Other activities as part of the public involvement plan that will occur are conducting online neighborhood community surveys/polls, using various social media platforms that optimize public participation and maintaining an active and up-to-date email correspondence list. U.S. 41 Winkler to South of MLK, City of Fort Myers, Lee County, FL. Public involvement specialist for the City of Fort Myers utility update project to include installation of new utilities and drainage structures. Work consists of coordination with stakeholders, project team members, property owners, tenants and other stakeholders. Other activities as part of the public involvement plan that will occur are newsletters, kick-off letters, post cards, contact cards, and maintaining an active and up-to-date email correspondence list. Evans Avenue Neighborhood Utility Improvements, City of Fort Myers, Lee County, FL. Public involvement specialist for the City’s construction project that replaced utilities in the Evans Avenue Neighborhood. This project replaced sanitary sewer, water mains and installed storm drainage. New sidewalk on both sides of Evans Avenue was also included in this project. Work consists of coordination with stakeholders, project team members, property owners, tenants and the public. Newsletters were mailed to property owners, businesses and tenants in the project area to announce construction of the project. Other public involvement activities consist of developing utility notices, contact cards, and maintaining an active and up-to-date email correspondence list. Extensive coordination with City staff and officials, property owners, tenants, residents and business owners are significant factors of the public involvement plan. Public involvement duties also include developing and maintaining a project specific page on the Fort Myers Utilities project website, www.FortMyersUtilities.com, and staffing a 24-hour telephone hotline to respond to public inquiries and comments. Caloosahatchee River Crossing, City of Cape Coral and City of Fort Myers, Lee County, FL. Public involvement specialist working with both the City of Cape Coral and the City of Fort Myers on the design-build project to include designing, permitting and constructing a reclaimed water main across the Caloosahatchee River near the Mid-Point Bridge. This reclaimed water main pipe will be the longest underground horizontal directional drill in the world. Work consists of coordination with stakeholders, project team members, property owners, tenants and the public. Downtown and Midtown Density Upgrades, City of Fort Myers, Lee County, FL. Provided public involvement assistance for the City of Fort Myers’ Downtown and Midtown Density Upgrades. Duties included coordination of public meetings and coordination with interested parties, residents and City of Fort Myers staff and officials. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 5 EDUCATION B.A., Communication – Concentration in Public relations, Florida Gulf Coast University, 2019 Graduated magna Cum Laude 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Miscellaneous Professional Services CN 2020-01 COLIN P. HENDERSON, ENV, SP Senior Environmental Scientist Mr. Henderson has 30 years of experience providing environmental services. He has extensive experience in the planning, design, and construction administration of civil and environmental projects. His work encompasses project management, preparation of assessment and remediation reports, biological monitoring, and permit compliance. He is experienced in construction oversight and coordinating with regulatory agencies and is proficient at obtaining environmental permits for mitigation and construction projects in sensitive environments. Venetian Causeway Rehabilitation Design-Build, Miami-Dade Public Works, Miami, FL; Senior Environmental Scientist. The project encompassed the complete demolition and replacement of the westernmost 731 feet of the existing Venetian Causeway bridge from Miami’s mainland to the outer islands. The replacement bridge replicates the original architecture of the structure, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and provides a seamless connection to the remaining bridge. The superstructure consists of precast arched beams and railings with unique aesthetics. The substructure consists of bents supported on drilled shaft foundations. Responsible for the permitting for the demolition and replacement of the westernmost 731fr of the bridge connecting Miami’s mainland to the outer islands. Smokehouse Bay Bridge Marco Island, FL. Senior Environmental Scientist. Environmental Scientist responsible for the environmental studies and permitting for the replacement of the Smokehouse Bay Bridge which lies within designated Critical Habitat for the endangered West Indian manatee and within the range of the endangered smalltooth sawfish. The replacement bridge allows for increased vertical clearance and improved navigation for boaters. The design also reduced bottom erosion and provides for improved water quality and circulation. Parks on both sides of the bay will be connected with safe pedestrian paths both above and below the bridge. Permitting was performed through the USACE, SFWMD and US Coast Guard. Chokoloskee Bridge Replacement Everglades City, FL. Senior Environmental Scientist. Environmental Scientist responsible for the environmental studies and permitting for the replacement of the Chokoloskee bridge on the causeway connecting Chokoloskee Island, the southernmost community on the west side of Florida, with Everglades City. This bridge crosses environmentally sensitive Chokoloskee Bay which is designated Critical Habitat for both the endangered West Indian manatee and the endangered smalltooth sawfish. The project is situated along the western extent of the Big Cypress National Preserve, these waters are Outstanding Florida Waters (OFW) and designated Class II waters (shellfish propagation or harvesting). Permitting for this project involves the US Coast Guard, SFWMD, USACE, USFWS, and NMFS. FDOT District Six, Port of Miami Tunnel Public-Private Partnership (PPP), Miami, Florida; Senior Environmental Engineer. The Tunnel travels under the sensitive environment of the Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve. As part of the technical advisory team supporting FDOT District Six, reviewed permitting and environmental compliance. Assisted in maintaining the procurement schedule, development of procurement documents, and review of the prospective concessionaires’ proposals. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 30 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS ENVISION Sustainability Professional EDUCATION MS, Environmental Engineering, Florida International University, 2000 BS, Wildlife and Fisheries Biology, University of California, Davis Campus, 1986 CERTIFICATIONS/ TRAINING OSHA Hazardous Materials Site Safety Supervisor and Hazardous Materials Emergency Responder DOT HM-181 Hazardous Materials Handling FDOT Water Quality Impact Evaluation FDEP Qualified Stormwater Management Inspector 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) BOON KIM CHONG, PE Senior Structural Engineer Mr. Chong has 27 years of structural engineering experience. He has been responsible for the overall conceptualization, production, and quality assurance for a wide variety of structural design projects. As Senior Structural Engineer, he actively participates in technical issues and monitors major projects. Mr. Chong’s experience focuses on the design of highway bridges and tunnels as well as transit facilities and special structural design. He has been responsible for the design of more than 70 bridges, with spans ranging up to 280 feet; the design of more than 50 retaining walls; the production of conceptual reports for an additional 40 bridges; and the design reviews of more than 200 bridges for various authorities. FDOT District 3, Districtwide Bridge Repair; Engineer of Record. TYLI was selected for this multi-year, on-call engineering services contract. The scope covers a wide range of design services related to bridge repair, bridge rehabilitation, and painting of structures to extend their useful service life. Under this contract, TYLI is designing a substructure and bulkhead repair project for the Dupont Bridge in Panama City, FL. We also designed a fast- paced, protective coating project for numerous bridges in downtown Panama City, where we were required to go from 60% Plans to the Final Signed & Sealed submittal in 60 days. FDOT District Six, SR 826 Palmetto Expressway Section 2 Design-Build from South of Sunset Drive to North of SW 31st Street, Miami, Florida; Engineer of Record and Structural Engineer. Section 2 involves approximately three miles of expressway and 3 interchanges in the southern reach of the corridor. The project starts from south of the Miller Drive interchange and ends north of the Bird Road Interchange with the SR 874/Don Shula Expressway, terminating in a major interchange midway through the project length. The primary purpose of the project was to widen the mainline from two to three lanes, or from three to four lanes, add auxiliary lanes between all interchanges, incorporate interchange improvements including surface streets, as well as operational and safety improvements along the mainline and interchange ramps. The project also included drainage, lighting, landscaping, ITS, and signalization improvements. Responsible for all miscellaneous structures and steel curve bridge final plan preparation for the design-build team. Lee County, Summerlin Road Six-Laning, Fort Myers, Florida; Structural Project Manager and Engineer of Record. Project consisted of continuous twin curve steel plate girder bridges at the interchange of Summerlin Road and Gladiolus Drive. The bridges have a 573-foot radius with a Texas U turn below the bridges. Both bridges span arrangements are 155’-232.5’-155.’ Live load deflection was the design control factor on plate girder depth. Single column hammerheads with 24-inch pile supports were used in the design.. Chong designed the twin steel plate girder bridges, two cantilever signs, two signal mast arms, a ground mounted sign, four luminary pilasters, and two temporary sheet pile walls. FDOT District Seven, SR 686 (CR 296 from East 40th Street to West of 28th Street), Clearwater, Florida; Design Engineer and Engineer of Record.. The bridges are a composite of hybrid design for steel plate girders and AASHTO prestressed beams. HS 25 loading was used for design. The girders have a 240-foot span over the canal. With various spacing and girder radii, the bridges have a challenging geometry for spanning over 118th Avenue and the canal. Boon was responsible for the design of a cantilever sign and seven temporary sheet pile walls. He was also responsible for preparing tasks from the Bridge Development Report to final plans, quality control, and overall bridge design. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 27 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer FL #48156 EDUCATION ME, Structural Civil Engineering, University of Florida, 1990 BS, Civil Engineering, Southern University A&M, 1988 CERTIFICATIONS/ TRAINING FHWA-NHI “LRFR for Highway Bridges” (2016) FDOT “Load Rating Summit: LRFR for Florida’s Bridges” (2005) FICE/FDOT “AASHTO LRFD for Structural Engineer” (2004) Penn State University “Project Management Development Program and Service” (2000- 2001) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Miscellaneous Professional Services CN 2020-01 FARZIN ZAFARANIAN, PE Senior Structural Engineer Mr. Zafaranian has over 22 years of experience in structural design and project management on a variety of structural engineering projects in Florida and the Southeast region of United States. His expertise is in design and construction of precast prestressed and cast-in-place post-tensioned concrete structures. He was the Engineer of Record (EOR) on the recently completed First Coast Expressway Bridge in FDOT District Two Design Build project as well as the EOR on three new bridges at Burnt Store Road in FDOT District One. Farzin also assists the FDOT District One and Seven Structures Maintenance Office (DSMO) as the Engineer of Record on various Bridge Rehabilitation projects. Miami Dade Expressway Authority, Operational Capacity and Interchange Improvements, Design Build, Engineer of Record. Prepared bridge plans and calculation for four bridges on this Design Build project. Oversaw the work of other junior engineers. Performed quality control tasks on these and other bridges on this project to ensure highest quality of plans. FDOT District Two, I-295 Express Lanes-Buckman Bridge Signage, Design Build, Jacksonville Florida; Engineer of Record. Designed the new signage over Buckman bridge that involved modifications to the bridge superstructure in order to support the new signs. FDOT District One, Burnt Store Road Expansion; Engineer of Record. Led the structural design, coordination and plan production of three new bridges. Supervised the work of four junior engineers and managed the QC/QA process. FDOT District Two, Buckman Bridge Rehabilitation Project, Jacksonville Florida; Structural Engineer. Prepared the repair plans and specifications for this $8.9 million bridge rehabilitation project. Handled all the post design reviews and field issues. FDOT District Seven, Movable Bridge Repair Various Locations Hillsborough County, Florida; Engineer of Record. Performed structural analysis of the lift tower modifications for the lift bridge on Hillsborough Avenue that required a 3-D finite element model. Assisted the project manager with overall project coordination and preparation of the plans and all technical documents. FDOT District Two, I-295 Express Lanes-Buckman Bridge Signage, Jacksonville Florida; Engineer of Record. Designed the new signage over Buckman bridge that involved modifications to the bridge superstructure in order to support the new signs. FDOT District Two, Mathews Fender Replacement Project, Jacksonville Florida; Structural Engineer. Designed the new fender system at Mathews Bridge. Handled all the post design reviews and field issues. FDOT District Seven, Districtwide Bridge Engineering Services, Florida; Structural Engineer. Performed load rating analysis on various bridges including the Howard Frankland Bridge. His other tasks include the preparation of a movable bridge operations manual for Districts One and Seven. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 22 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer FL #59558 EDUCATION MBA, University of South Florida, 2003 MS, Civil Engineering, University of South Florida, 1997 BS, Civil Engineering, University of South Florida, 1994 CERTIFICATIONS Project Management Professional, PMP 2010 National Highway Institute Bridge Inspection Refresher Course FDOT Specifications Package Training, 2012 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) FRANCISCO J. ALONSO, PE Grant Compliance Officer Mr. Alonso is a Professional Engineer with over 15 years of experience in management, planning, design, permitting and construction of municipal engineering projects which include site Civil design and permitting, storm-water master planning, storm-water design and permitting, and general roadway design. In addition, he has provided professional engineering services as a consultant managing capital projects for various municipalities. FIU-UniversityCity TIGER Prosperity Project – Pedestrian Bridge and Complete Streets – Florida International University, Miami-Dade County. TYLI assisted the Florida International University (FIU) over a span of four years to develop and ultimately secure an USDOT TIGER grant for the implementation of the UniversityCity Prosperity Project. TYLI’s major role in this project was as the Design Criteria Professional working with Florida International University (FIU) to develop the design criteria package for an ultimate design build solicitation and taking the project through the federal NEPA process (which was successfully completed in 3 months). TYLI developed the conceptual drawings for the complete streets and signature pedestrian bridge and also prepared the RFP package in coordination with the FDOT LAP office, FHWA, and various other state and local agencies including Miami-Dade County, SFWMD, and SHPO. City of West Miami – City Engineer Contract – 2002-present. TYLI has served as the City Engineer for the City of West Miami since 1998. Mr. Alonso has worked on this contract since 2002 in the capacity of designer, engineer, and since 2010 has served as Lead Engineer in charge of the firms’ responsibilities as City Engineer and as Building Official. Said responsibilities include: • Administrative oversight and charge of the City’s Building Department (which is managed by TYLI) • Plan Review and Inspection for the City’s Public Works and Zoning Department, where Mr. Alonso has served as the lead reviewer. Under this contract, Mr. Alonso has been involved as the engineer-of-record on the Citywide Drainage Improvement Projects, several water main improvement projects, and pump station retrofits. City of Miami General Engineering Contract – 2002-present. Mr. Alonso has provided professional engineering services and project management for various projects under the firms Miscellaneous Engineering Contract with the City of Miami including: • Mary Brickell Village Drainage and Roadway Improvements Project • NW 8th and 14th Court Roadway and Drainage Improvements • Annual FEMA PDM Application Preparation • Durham Terrace Drainage Improvements Project • Fairlawn and Tamiami Storm Sewer Improvements Project Master Plan Improvements • Fairlawn Storm Sewer Improvements – Phase IIB City of North Miami, Breezeswept Drainage and Sidewalk System Upgrades, North Miami, Florida; Lead Design Engineer. Mr. Alonso was the lead engineering provided YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 15 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer, Civil Engineering Florida #66918 Building Code Administrator Florida #BU1870 ICC Certified Building Official Certificate No. 8288137 EDUCATION BS, Mechanical Engineering, University of Miami, 2002 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Florida Engineering Society Miami Chapter 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) stormwater modeling and design services for these stormwater infrastructure improvements. Improvements included localized exfiltration trench systems and permitting with SFWMD, DERM and Miami-Dade County, as well as reconstruction of the roadway and sidewalks. Project was completed on time and on budget. City of West Miami, Citywide Drainage Improvements/ Phase II, III and IV, West Miami, Florida; Project Manager and Engineer-of-Record. Mr. Alonso Provided stormwater master plan modeling and design services for these stormwater infrastructure improvements. This project was an extension of the phase I improvements and included expansion of the collection system to new areas, localized exfiltration trench systems and permitting with SFWMD, DERM and Miami-Dade County. Project was completed on time and on budget in 2010. Francisco Alonso, PE Grant Compliance Officer Cont. 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RICHARD WHITE, JR., PE Senior Drainage Engineer Mr. White has 28 years of engineering experience with drainage and stormwater management projects of all types. His specific experience includes stormwater master planning; hydrologic and hydraulic modeling; basin studies; Bridge Hydraulic Reports; scour evaluation and design of scour countermeasures; roadway drainage design; stormwater management facilities design; grant application development; local, State and Federal permitting; site development; and other public works projects. Estero Boulevard, Fort Myers Beach, Florida. This innovative project includes reconstruction of approximately 5.5 miles of urban/suburban roadway running the length of Fort Myers Beach. Project objectives include improving drainage along the entire corridor and providing significant stormwater treatment without ponds or right-of-way acquisition. The project is being designed to provide stormwater treatment and attenuation using permeable paver blocks and exfiltration trench for a nearly continuous center turn lane, outside turn lanes and shoulders, and bus pull-outs. The project is expected to provide the town with significant water quality credits to apply toward future projects and the town’s NPDES permit goals, represents a very cost savings over traditional treatment methods, and provides enough attenuation to allow the use of existing outfalls without modification and avoidance SFWMD permitting. Collier County DOT, Chokoloskee Bridge Replacement, Chokoloskee, Florida; Drainage Engineer. The existing bridge has been repeatedly damaged by large storms and tidal scour. The new bridge will improve navigation and be designed to withstand scour and storm damage. Responsible for hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, scour analysis, design of scour countermeasures, and State and Federal permitting for replacement of a 200-foot bridge. SR-84 (Davis Boulevard), Collier County, Florida. The project consisted of widening 3.2 miles of existing two lane road to six lanes. The project was divided into two segments for design and construction to accelerate the project schedule. The design eliminated all pond sites for the west segment of the project by providing compensating treatment in the east segment pond and attenuation with a large pipe detention system under the median of the west segment. The estimated cost savings were at least $7 million not including the long-term maintenance savings. Besides permitting for the roadway, permits were also required for modifications to three adjacent developments. Richard’s responsibilities for this 3.2-mile widening project include preparation of Pond Siting Reports as part of PD&E update, development of development and implementation of the pipe detention system to reduce costs, drainage calculations and hydraulic design, permitting, and preparation of a full Drainage Documentation Report. Construction was completed in 2014. City of Fort Myers, South Street “Matthews Drive,” Fort Myers, Florida; Project Manager/Engineer of Record. Richard oversaw the design and permitting of 3,200 feet of culvert to enclose an existing canal including study and modeling of an urban watershed of approximately 75 acres using SWMM5, cost estimates, value engineering, preparation of specifications and construction bid package. The project involved significant utility coordination, restricted right-of-way, and floodplain compensation. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 28 PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer FL #47754 EDUCATION Master of Divinity, Christian Education and Counseling, SEBTS, 2000 BS, Civil Engineering, The Citadel, 1989 CERTIFICATIONS Stormwater Management Inspector (FDEP) PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Florida Engineering Society National Society of Professional Engineers 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) DAVID REYNOLDS, PE Senior Civil Engineer Mr. Reynolds has 31 years of experience in design, project management, and construction inspection for various forms of state and private transportation improvements and site development. He has worked in conventional Design-Bid-Build, Design-Build, and On-Call Service Contracts for Federal, State, and Municipal agencies as well as private enterprises. His design work includes highway/roadway, horizontal/vertical layout, stormwater management, drainage, grading, earthwork, lighting, utility design, erosion-sediment control, construction estimates, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, and scour countermeasure design experience. Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, SR 836 Dolphin Expressway Capacity Improvements, Miami, FL. Project Engineer. Provided design engineering for roadway drainage and hydraulic analysis and coordination with the Contractor for the culvert extensions and permitting. Design-build project involved mainline widening and reconfiguration of three major interchanges of the urban arterial toll facility. Improvements involved the widening of 21 bridges and construction of 12 new bridges. Required significant drainage improvements to mainline, interchange, and side street storm sewer systems, including stormwater management ponds and French drains as well as extensions of existing major culverts conveying a flood management canal. Scour Countermeasures for Ten Bridges, Maine Department of Transportation, ME. Project Engineer. The Project involved the implementation of Plan of Action Report recommendations at ten scour-critical bridge sites in Southern Maine. David was responsible for the design of scour countermeasures at individual bridge sites based on hydraulic conditions and site constrains, the development of Preliminary Design Reports (PDRs), and Plans, Specifications & Estimate (PS&E) documentation. Statewide Bridge Scour Assessment, Maine Department of Transportation (MDOT), ME. Project Engineer. Provided Engineering services for MDOT. Performed hydraulic engineering analyses and bridge scour assessments of 78 bridge sites for riverine scour impacts and plans of action for structural countermeasures or recommended monitoring. Responsible for reviewing Phase I assessment documentation, developing Phase II hydraulic analysis, and developing Phase III Plans of Action. Caribou Connector Design-Build, Maine DOT, Caribou, ME. As Project Engineer David provided Engineering services to the Maine Department of Transportation (MDOT) for this design-build contract for a 2.8-mile segment of the new rural minor arterial. The project included roadway design, bridge design, drainage design, traffic analysis, utility coordination, and design of a new connection to the Interconnected Trail System. David was responsible for all utility coordination including mitigation of all utility conflicts with water and sanitary sewer facilities. Mr. Reynolds was responsible for the design and planning of relocations for 460 LF of 8” DIP sanitary sewer, 360 LF of 12” sanitary sewer, and 170 LF of 12” water main to resolve utility conflicts and maintain minimum depths. He also negotiated the inter-agency Utility Agreement between MaineDOT, the Contractor, and the local Utility District YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 31 PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer FL #61052 EDUCATION BS/1990/Civil Engineering/Virginia Military Institute, Lexington, Virginia United States Military Academy, West Point, New York CERTIFICATIONS Natural Stream Restoration / West Virginia University ISI Sustainability Professional AFFILIATIONS Florida Engineering Society, Member, Chapter Board of Directors National Society of Professional Engineers, Member 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) NYREE QUINTERO, MSC, PE Design-Build Program Manager Nyree Quintero is a leader in T.Y. Lin International’s working in alternative procurement process, design build and program management projects. With 24 years of civil engineering and infrastructure experience, and a unique combination of extensive managerial and technical experience in design - build projects, Mrs. Quintero has vast expertise with large, complex projects, solid analytical competencies and the ability to leverage existing platforms into new, successful ventures. She also has considerable experience in contracts and construction management, negotiations and amendments, financial and overall management, project management, cost control, scheduling and estimating, risk assessment and planning. Mrs. Quintero has broad national and international experience in engineering design as well as overall project management, project controls, contract administration, design build experience, schedule and claims analysis. Design Build Projects US South Region, Florida, USA 2016 – Present. Mrs. Quintero as Operations manager for alternative procurement projects is part of the management team with emphasis in contract administration and special projects region’s operations. Mrs. Quintero has monitored, controlled, documented and negotiated scope’ changes, Contract Modification Requests (CMRs) from the Contractor and/Owner, control includes logging in and out, monitoring for contract compliance with turn-around criteria, and monitoring costs, schedule and scope related issues under the Contract. Mrs. Quintero supports identifying success and risk factors for new design build projects during the bid process as well as agreements negotiation with Contractors. As part of her Project Controls functions, a constant job’s progress evaluation based on established WBS and CPM Project Schedule against the Contractor’s Master Schedule, updates, recovery plans as needed, variance reports, stakeholder coordination updates, sub consultants Contract Status Reports and Financial project progress based on Earned Value Report, Cost to complete Analysis are performed. SR 589 (Veterans Expressway) Widening and Resurfacing from South of Gunn Highway to Sugarwood Mainline Toll Plaza, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Hillsborough County; Contract Manager/Project Controls specialist. The Project included the design and construction of the widening and resurfacing of the Veterans Expressway (SR 589) from south of Gunn Hwy to the Sugarwood AET Mainline Gantry. The project is approximately 1.7 miles, to accommodate two additional mainline travel lanes in each direction of the Veterans Expressway for 8 lanes. Other major work elements include drainage, permit modification, traffic control, traffic signals, signing and pavement, lighting, ITS, and utility coordination. I-85/I-385 Interchange Reconstruction Design-Build Project, South Carolina DOT, Greenville, SC; Contract Manager/Project Controls Specialist. TYLI is providing structural design services for this $231 million design-build project to reconstruct the I-85 and I-385 Interchange in Greenville, SC. TYLI is providing structural engineering services for six structures, including the two major flyovers on the project. These two flyovers range from 1,550 feet to 1,900 feet in total length and each consist of three to four continuous steel curved plate girder units with maximum span lengths in the range of 260 feet. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 24 PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer Colombia #2520259931 CND, 1996 Certified General Contractor Florida License CGC 1521761, 2013 OSHA 30 hours Construction Industry Outreach Training, 2014 EDUCATION Master Degree in Business Administration, Inalde Business School, 2012 Master of Science in Geotechnical Engineering, National University of Colombia, 2001 Bachelor of Civil Engineering, National University of Colombia, 1995 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 2 PAST PERFORMANCE San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge New East Span 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 2. Past Performance 1 | Page T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL - SOLVING TODAY'S ENGINEERING CHALLENGES WITH CONSTRUCTABLE SOLUTIONS 2. Past Performance T.Y. Lin International, Inc. (TYLI) has a history of performing on similar contracts for Southwest Florida communities. “Library” Professional Services contracts can involve a wide variety of assignments and often require that multiple task orders be conducted simultaneously. Consequently, an Engineering Consultant must possess a wide range of technical skills to be able to handle any type of assignment that could arise. In addition, the Consultant for this contract should have several staff members who are capable of conducting each type of assignment to ensure that simultaneous or overlapping assignments can be accommodated without compromising quality or schedule. The TYLI TEAM approach to the County’s “Professional Services Library Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category” projects centers on Communication and Teamwork. Our objective is to provide services as a seamless extension of the County’s staff, to ensure complete, practical, easily built and fully functional solutions. To accomplish this objective TYLI will conduct responsive, clear and consistent communication with the County’s staff and regulatory agencies and affected stakeholders on each task. Once our assignment is defined and the objectives are determined, we will assemble the appropriate team of professionals and specialists best suited to meet the objectives of the task at hand. To accomplish this objective, upon receipt of a specific work order assignment, our Project Manager Jim Molnar will communicate directly with the County’s Project Manager and obtain all the related background data, studies, meeting notes, etc. He will then develop a project plan that defines the specific scope; schedule and budget as well as any critical elements the County may require in order to achieve a successful project. Library task assignments can range from simple analysis of existing or proposed facilities to complex design of intricate systems. Jim has at his disposal a wealth of experience and knowledge within TYLI so that he can tailor the staffing plan to best meet the County’s needs. This plan will be presented to the County’s Project Manager to confirm a full understanding of the desired objectives and issues prior to proceeding with the task assignment. Although a good consultant must be able to work independently with minimal “supervision” on the part of the client, this type of working relationship requires an open line of communication on a continuous basis. TYLI will keep the County’s Project Manager apprised of the current status of all on-going task assignments (including any problems or issues that may need to be resolved) and the County’s Project Manager must keep the consultant apprised of any events that occur that will affect the specific assignment (such as schedule, deliverables, etc.). Jim will communicate with the Team members via regularly scheduled project meetings to maintain an informed and knowledgeable working environment. This will allow all Team members the opportunity to share individual perspectives resulting in a combined best effort to accomplish the objectives and goals identified at the onset. These meetings will also serve to ensure that proper resources are allocated to meet the project milestones. We understand the general use of this type contract is to assist in the development of solutions to unexpected and often unbudgeted problems in a community with ever-tightening budget constraints. The TEAM we offer is fully committed to Collier County and cognizant of the difficult budgetary constraints it faces. 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 2. Past Performance 2 | Page T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL - SOLVING TODAY'S ENGINEERING CHALLENGES WITH CONSTRUCTABLE SOLUTIONS In addition to the projects illustrated on the Reference Questionnaires following this section, below is a list of some of the tasks we have performed in Southwest Florida under similar contracts (names of staff proposed for this project who worked on the tasks): • Miscellaneous Structural Engineering Services Contract Lee County Department of Transportation 2007 Contract Gladiolus Drive Foundation Design (Jim & Boon) Fee $27K 2011 Contract Lakes Park Handrail Replacement Design (Jim & Boon) Fee $4.2K Sanibel Causeway Bridge Beam Inspection & Report 1/2013 Sanibel Causeway Bridge Beam Inspection & Report 7/2013 Sanibel Causeway Bridge Beam Inspection & Report 5/2015 Fee $306K (Jim, Boon, Farzin, Brian & Miguel) 2015 Contract Leeland Heights Mast Arm Inspection & Replacement Fee $23K (Jim, Boon & Daniel) 9 County Weir Inspections & Assessment Reports Fee $42.7K (Jim & Miguel) • Miscellaneous Professional Services Contract Lee County Department of Transportation 2006 Contract Winkler Road Sidewalk Extension (Jim, Don & Brian) Fee $48.9K 2008 Contract Summerlin Road Bike Lane Design (Jim, Don & Richard) Fee $32.5K Sanibel Toll Plaza Bike Path Fee $72K (Jim, Don, Brian, Boon, & Richard) Punta Rassa Trailer Parking Expansion (Jim, Don & Boon) Fee $24.5K Summerlin Road Resurfacing Plans (Jim) Fee $30.5K 2012 Contract Summerlin Sidewalk CEI (Jim) Fee $60K 2014 Contract Kelly Park Soccer Field Irrigation Source Study & Design Fee $78K (Jim & Richard) Summerlin Road Inspection & Permit Certification Fee $32.5K (Jim, Richard & Brian) Construction QA at County Solid Waste Disposal Facility (Jim) Fee $47.7K 2016 Contract Popash Creek Weir Hurricane Damage Repair Design Fee $6.0K (Jim, Boon & Richard) Tanglewood Elementary School Parking Lot Expansion Fee $37K (Jim, Richard & Brian) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 2. Past Performance 3 | Page T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL - SOLVING TODAY'S ENGINEERING CHALLENGES WITH CONSTRUCTABLE SOLUTIONS • Miscellaneous Traffic Engineering Services Contract Lee County Department of Transportation 2006 Contract Nine Assignments (Jim, Boon, Brian, Richard & Don) Fee $433K 2010 Contract Corkscrew-Piney Woods Signal Design Fee $38K (Jim, Boon & Brian) Del Prado Emergency Signal Pole Repair (Jim & Boon) Fee $7.2K • Structural Engineering Services – Continuing Contract City of Fort Myers 2019 Contract No tasks assignments to date • Miscellaneous Engineering Services Contract City of Fort Myers 2006 Contract 11 Task Assignments (Jim, Richard, Boon & Brian) Fee $493.1K 2008 Contract Fort Myers High Culvert Replacement CEI (Jim) Fee $85K SR80/Shoemaker Boulevard Intersection Improvements Fee $21.5K (Jim) 2011 Contract Marion Street Sidewalk & Drainage CEI (Jim) Fee $78.5K Wayfinding Signage Mapping (Jim & Brian) Fee $18.5K Country Manor Waterline Replacement CEI Fee $136K (Jim & Richard) Utility Locates Support (Jim) Fee $75K • Miscellaneous Bridge Design, Rehabilitation and Repair Engineering Services Contract City of Marco Island 2008 Contract Hernando Bridge Rehabilitation Fee $90K (Jim, Boon, & Brian) Smokehouse Bay Bridge Replacement Design Fee $1.6M (Jim, Richard, Boon, Brian, Colin & Atiq) Smokehouse Bay Bridge Replacement CEI Fee $0.99M (Jim, Richard & Boon) • Pre-Qualified Professional Services Contract Lehigh Acres Municipal Services Improvements (f/k/a East County Water Control District) 2012 Contract Hendry Canal Extension Design, Permitting, & Certification Fee $213K 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 2. Past Performance 4 | Page T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL - SOLVING TODAY'S ENGINEERING CHALLENGES WITH CONSTRUCTABLE SOLUTIONS (Jim, Richard & Brian) 8th Street at Sailfish Canal Emergency Bridge Repair Design Fee $12.5K (Jim, Boon & Daniel) 2018 Contract Richmond Ave. Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Design (Pending) Fee $62K (Jim, Boon, Daniel & Brian) • Professional Services Contract Collier County 2014 Contract Golden Gate Parkway at Airport Pulling Road Repair Design Fee $97.7K (Jim, Boon & Daniel) 2 County Parking Structure Inspections & Reports Fee $13.7K (Jim & Farzin) County Property Appraiser Building Damage Inspection Fee $4.3K (Jim & Farzin) Logan Boulevard at Immokalee Road Bridge Load Rating Fee $12.8K (Jim, Boon & Daniel) 2019 Contract No task assignments to date • Miscellaneous Environmental Contract Lee County Department of Transportation Landfill Water Quality Monitoring (Jim) Fee $17K • Professional Services Library: Engineering and Architecture Contract City of Marco Island 2019 Contract No task assignments to date Further, TYLI has also performed the following tasks under planning contracts; • SFRTA Commuter Bus Comprehensive Analysis and Operations Plan Palm Beach and Broward Counties TYLI staff evaluated current commuter bus operational policies and procedures, ADA compliance requirements, conducted field visits to assess boarding/alighting locations as well as analyzing ridership and bus operations data from an efficiency and effectiveness standpoint 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 2. Past Performance 5 | Page T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL - SOLVING TODAY'S ENGINEERING CHALLENGES WITH CONSTRUCTABLE SOLUTIONS • Nova Southeastern University (NSU) Shark Shuttle Service Evaluation Broward County TYLI staff conducted a comprehensive assessment of NSU’s shuttle service including existing conditions analysis, operations analysis and financial analysis. Based on these analyses and evaluation of alternative improvement strategies, TYLI’s transit experts made short and long-term recommendations to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the University’s shuttle service to meet peak transit demand while reducing operations and maintenance cost • Pines Flamingo Center Turn Overpass (CTO) Concept Design Broward County TYLI developed a concept plan for a Center Turn Overpass (CTO) for the intersection of Pines Boulevard and Flamingo Road in the City of Pembroke Pines. TYLI staff performed an engineering and operational feasbility analysis as well as developed plannning level construction cost estimates. Since a CTO has not been constructed anywhere in the U.S., a critical component of this project was to communicate the benefits of this esoteric design concept to elected officials and other transportation professionals. 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category 2. Past Performance 6 | Page T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL - SOLVING TODAY'S ENGINEERING CHALLENGES WITH CONSTRUCTABLE SOLUTIONS • Broward County Bicycle/Pedestrian Action Plan Broward County TYLI staff led a bicycle and pedestrian crash analysis using the ArcGIS software package to identify hot spot zones and recommending appropriate safety countermeasures based on the 4Es Concept – Engineering, Education, Enforcement, and Emergency Services. PBCAT was used to analyze crash data for selected hot spots. The project included extensive public engagement, stakeholder/agency coordination through public workshops, meetings, as well as Walking and Biking Audits. • Downtown Boca Raton Transit Feasibility Study City of Boca Raton TYLI staff evaluated the feasibility of a series of transit services in Downtown Boca Raton for the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA) and the City of Boca Raton. As part of this study, TYLI staff prepared alternative transit networks (downtown circulators and downtown- commuter rail connectors), service plans, cost estimates, and ridership forecasts. Several alternative transit alignments were reviewed to provide access to and from the Tri-Rail stations and Downtown Boca Raton and major traffic generators within the study area, and corresponding service plans, schedules, and bus stops were tested. Cost estimates were also prepared for capital (e.g., vehicles, facilities) and operations and maintenance expenditures. TYLI’s corporate and professional commitments have provided us the opportunity to work throughout the world on projects of varying size and complexity. The TYLI TEAM is committing the resources and staff to complete any task assignment in a timely manner for the people of Collier County. 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACH REQUIRED REFERENCE) Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category Reference Questionnaire for: (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) T. Y. Lin International (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: FAX:Telephone: Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: ___________________________ Completion Date: _____________________________ Project Budget: _______________________________ Project Number of Days: _______________________ Item Criteria Score (must be completed) 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 3 Quality of work. 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS Martin MPO Transportation Planning Services, Martin County, Florida Vikas Jain, AICP, GISP Beth Beltran Martin Metropolitan Planning Organization bbeltran@martin.fl.us 772.288.5484 2014-2023 Transit Development Plan, Major Update Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety Action Plan 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Ongoing Fee: $550,000 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 100 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Martin MPO Transportation Planning Services Martin County, Florida Owner/Client: Martin MPO Ms. Beth Beltran, MPO Administrator 3481 SE Willoughby Blvd, Suite 101, Stuart, FL 34994 (772) 288-5484 bbeltran@martin.fl.us Start Date: October 2012 Completion Date: Ongoing Fee: $550,000 Key Staff Joe Yesbeck, PE Vikas Jain, AICP, GISP Tom Errico, PE Rich Perrin, AICP Sara Gutekunst Nathan King Since 2012, under its Transportation Planning Services contract with the Martin Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), T.Y. Lin International provided techincal assistance and completed the following major projects: 1.2014-2023 Transit Development Plan, Major Update, Martin County 2. Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety Action Plan (BPSAP), Martin County 3. Professionl Techinical Adisory Services 4. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan These projects included conducting transportation and transit data collection, land use and demographic analysis, environemntal justice (EJ) analsyis, ridership forecasts, concept planning and engineering analysis amogst other techinical tasks. Further, TYLI conducted the MPO planning process and engaged with the MPO Advisory Committees and MPO Policy Board. A key component of MPO planning process required TYLI to conduct robust public invovlement and stakeholder engagement activities. Since 2019, TYLI staff is assisting the Martin MPO with its 2045 Long Range Transportaiton Plan (LRTP) called Martin in Motion. 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACH REQUIRED REFERENCE) Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category Reference Questionnaire for: (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) T. Y. Lin International Company: (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Benjamin Restrepo, PE (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Email BRestrepo@fortlauderdale.gov FAX:Telephone: Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: ___________________________ Completion Date: _____________________________ Project Budget: _______________________________ Project Number of Days: _______________________ Item Criteria Score (must be completed) 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 3 Quality of work. 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS Traffic and Transportation Engineering Services, Fort Lauderdale, FL Vikas Jain, AICP, GISP City of Fort Lauderdale 954-828-5216 Traffic and Transportation Engineering Services Ongoing 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 90 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Traffic and Transportation Engineering Services Fort Lauderdale, Florida Owner/Client: City of Fort Lauderdale Karen Warfel Transportation Planning Program Manager, Transportation and Mobility, 290 NE 3rd Ave., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 828-3798 kwarfel@fortlauderdale.gov Start Date: August 2011 Completion Date: to Present Key Staff Joe Yesbeck, PE Vikas Jain, AICP, GISP Darryl Dansby Jim Eriksen, PE Trung Nguyen, PE Cherry Xiong, PE Meaghan Capuano, PE Gus Schmidt, PE T.Y. Lin International (TYLI) provides support to the City of Fort Lauderdale, Transportation and Mobility (TAM) Department staff in preparing the gamut of multimodal transportation planning studies, traffic and transportation engineering plans, as well as serves as an extension of the staff to fulfill the Department's needs on a day-to-day basis. To date, TYLI has provide technical and professional services to TAM through the following task orders: 1. Traffic and Parking Study Reviews for 25 development projects 2. Lake Ridge Neighborhood Mobility Masterplan 3. Powerline Road/SR-845 Lane Elimination Application 4. Flagler Village Parking Supply and Demand Study 5. Downtown Walkability Design Project (Final Design) 6. NE 13th Street Complete Streets Final Design 7. Las Olas Boulevard Traffic Workshop 8. Breakers Avenue Concept Design 9. Downtown Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) Traffic Review 10. Northwest CRA Streetcar Feasibility Study 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACH REQUIRED REFERENCE) Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category Reference Questionnaire for: (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) T. Y. Lin International (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: FAX:Telephone: Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: ___________________________Completion Date: _____________________________ Project Budget: _______________________________Project Number of Days: _______________________ Item Criteria Score (must be completed) 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 3 Quality of work. 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS Biscayne Boulevard Lane Elimination Study Vikas Jain, AICP, GISP Miami Downtown Development AuthorityNeal Schafers, ASLA schafers@miamidda.com 305-379-6566 Biscayne Boulevard Lane Elimination Study Ongoing Fee: $459,000 305-371-2423 9 10 10 9 10 9 10 9 10 10 07.31.2020 96 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Biscayne Boulevard Lane Elimination Study Miami Downtown Development Authority, Florida Owner/Client: Miami Downtown Development Authority (DDA) Neal Schafers, ASLA Senior Manager 200 S. Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2929, Miami, FL 33131 (305) 379-6566 schafers@miamidda.com Start Date: June 2019 Completion Date: Ongoing Fee: $459,000 Key Staff Joe Yesbeck, PE Vikas Jain, AICP, GISP Chris Kruger, PE Sara Gutekunst Meaghan Capuano, PE Isabel Nayab, PE Francisco Alonso, PE T.Y. Lin International (TYLI) is assisting Miami Downtown Development Authority (DDA) to evaluate the impact of eliminating one or more travel lanes on Biscayne Boulevard/US-1 corridor betweewn SE 1st Street and NE 6th Street in Miami Downtown. The purpose of the project is to create a bicycle, pedestrian and transit supportive environment as well as activate the median for public and enconomic development opportunities. TYLI is condcuting travel demand forecasts (SERPM), traffic operations analysis using Synchro and ARTPLAN, safety studies, developing construction costs, 30% design plans as well as assessing environmental impacts to complete the technical evalaution for FDOT District Six review and approval. Key component of this project is extensive public involvement. TYLI conducted one-on-one stakeholder interviews with more than 12 entities and elected officials in the corridor and is hosting three public meetings over the project life cycle. In addition to citizen and tehincial advisory committee meetings, TYLI will present the findings to the City Commission for final approval and resolution. This project will culminate with the TYLI preparing and submitting a Final Concept Report and Lane Elimination Application to FDOT District Six. 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8Packet Pg. 628Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Sistrunk Boulevard Streetcar Feasibility Study Fort Lauderdale, Florida 3 RECENT, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WORKLOADS OF THE FIRM Estero Boulevard ImprovementsFort Myers Beach, Florida 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS 18-7432-RB Professional Services Library: Road & Bridge Study, Planning and Design Category 3. Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm 1 | PageT.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL - SOLVING TODAY'S ENGINEERING CHALLENGES WITH CONSTRUCTABLE SOLUTIONS 3.Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm T. Y. Lin International’s (TYLI) TEAM projected availability: Resources, % Available to Collier County TEAM Member FIRM 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 William Wuensch, PE PTOE EPR 25% 40% 50% 50% 50% Vikas Jain, AICP TYLI 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% Meaghan Capuano, PE TYLI 10% 25% 30% 30% 30% Kris Cella CMA 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% Thomas Errico, PE TYLI 15% 25% 25% 25% 25% Justin Cooner, PE EPR 50% 60% 60% 60% 60% Jessica Dimmick, PE EPR 35% 40% 50% 50% 50% Richard Perrin, AICP TYLI 20% 25% 35% 35% 35% James Eriksen, PE TYLI 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% Cherry Xiong, PE TYLI 30% 25% 25% 25% 25% Sara Gutekunst TYLI 25% 25% 25% 30% 30% Francisco Alonso, PE TYLI 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Nyree Quintero, MSc, PE TYLI 10% 25% 25% 25% 25% Adriano Foti, PE TYLI 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% Colin Henderson, ENV SP TYLI 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% Brian Werner, PE TYLI 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% Richard White, PE TYLI 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% David Reynolds, PE TYLI 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% Boon Chong, PE TYLI 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% Farzin Zafaranian, PE TYLI 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% Ashlynn Super CMA 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS 18-7432-RB Professional Services Library: Road & Bridge Study, Planning and Design Category 3. Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm 2 | Page T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL - SOLVING TODAY'S ENGINEERING CHALLENGES WITH CONSTRUCTABLE SOLUTIONS T. Y. Lin International’s (TYLI) TEAM current workload: Team Member Firm Current Project Est. End Date % Committed Jim Molnar, PE TYLI 501/221 Intersection Tanglewood Elementary City of Sanibel 6/2021 10/2020 6/2021 10% 15% 10% Atiq Alvi, PE TYLI Sunshine Skyway Bridge Tampa Office Manager 1/2024 1/2025 15% 20% Isabel Nayab, PE TYLI I-35 Design Build SR 52 Roundabout SR390 over Mill Bayou 8/2020 12/2021 11/2020 25% 10% 10% William Wuensch, PE PTOE EPR Central VA MPO LRTP and Danville MPO LRTP 10/2020 50% Vikas Jain, AICP TYLI 2045 LRTP, Martin MPO Biscayne Blvd. Lane Elimination Study 11/2020 12//2020 50% Meaghan Capuano, PE TYLI Biscayne Blvd. Lane Elimination Study University City SAMS 12/2020 7/20201 50% 25% Kris Cella CM FDOT US 41 Roadway and Utility Improvements Project (Lee) Lee County Big Carlos Bridge PD&E 2022 2021 25% 10% Thomas Errico, PE TYLI City of Portland On-Call Engineering Skowhegan Bridge Feasibility Study On-Going 12/2020 15% 15% Justin Cooner, PE EPR VDOT TMPD Project Database 9/2020 50% Jessica Dimmick, PE EPR Norfolk Master Multimodal Transportation Plan 6/2021 50% Richard Perrin, AICP TYLI NYS Association of Metropolitan Planning Org. Staff Support NYS Route 5 (Buffalo Skyway) Environmental Impact Stmt Martin Metropolitan Planning Org Long Range Plan 12/2021 7/2021 9/2020 15% 60% 5% James Eriksen, PE TYLI Brightline – Orlando Vehicle Maintenance Facility (Final Design) SFRTA – MiamiCentral Station Client Representative 8/2020 3/2021 15% 15% Cherry Xiong, PE TYLI Kittery (Maine) Shipyard Traffic Study VISSIM Simulation TYLI China Planning and Traffic Engineering Technical Asst. 8/2020 12/2020 90% 20% Sara Gutekunst TYLI Bowman’s Beach Pedestrian Bridge Pompano Beach Bridges 12/2020 12/2020 5% 10% Francisco Alonso, PE TYLI West Miami City Engineer Miami Office Manager 1/2025 1/2025 20% 30% Nyree Quintero, MSc, PE TYLI I-35 NEX Panama Fourth Crossing Bridge Miami North Corridor 1/2021 4/2023 4/2021 30% 30% 15% Adriano Foti, PE TYLI I-35 Design Build 8/2020 50% Colin Henderson, ENV SP TYLI MD PROS In House Env Support City of Miami Misc. Env. Engineering MDAD SWPPP 8/2020 6/2021 11/2024 50% 15% 10% Brian Werner, PE TYLI 501/221 Intersection 10/2021 50% Richard White, PE TYLI Estero Boulevard Improvements Brightline Vehicle Maintenance Facility 12/2021 12/2020 5% 50% 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) RPS 18-7432-RB Professional Services Library: Road & Bridge Study, Planning and Design Category 3. Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm 3 | Page T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL - SOLVING TODAY'S ENGINEERING CHALLENGES WITH CONSTRUCTABLE SOLUTIONS Team Member Firm Current Project Est. End Date % Committed Boon Chong, PE TYLI FDOT D1 Maintenance On-Call Bowman’s Beach Pedestrian Bridge SR 390 over Mill Bayou 2/2021 12/2020 11/2020 2% 20% 30% Farzin Zafaranian, PE TYLI Bowman’s Beach Pedestrian Bridge Tampa Airport Taxiway A Vanderbilt Parking Garage – Collier County 12/2020 12/2020 8/2020 20% 15% 15% Ashlynn Super CM Collier County – I-75 and Collier Blvd Design Build Collier County – Logan Blvd. Design Build 2021 20201 20% 20% 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 4 REQUIRED FORMS Dublin Link Dublin, Ohio 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACH REQUIRED REFERENCE) Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category Reference Questionnaire for: (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) T. Y. Lin International (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: FAX:Telephone: Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: ___________________________Completion Date: _____________________________ Project Budget: _______________________________Project Number of Days: _______________________ Item Criteria Score (must be completed) 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 3 Quality of work. 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS Biscayne Boulevard Lane Elimination Study Vikas Jain, AICP, GISP Miami Downtown Development AuthorityNeal Schafers, ASLA schafers@miamidda.com 305-379-6566 Biscayne Boulevard Lane Elimination Study Ongoing Fee: $459,000 305-371-2423 9 10 10 9 10 9 10 9 10 10 07.31.2020 96 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Biscayne Boulevard Lane Elimination Study Miami Downtown Development Authority, Florida Owner/Client: Miami Downtown Development Authority (DDA) Neal Schafers, ASLA Senior Manager 200 S. Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2929, Miami, FL 33131 (305) 379-6566 schafers@miamidda.com Start Date: June 2019 Completion Date: Ongoing Fee: $459,000 Key Staff Joe Yesbeck, PE Vikas Jain, AICP, GISP Chris Kruger, PE Sara Gutekunst Meaghan Capuano, PE Isabel Nayab, PE Francisco Alonso, PE T.Y. Lin International (TYLI) is assisting Miami Downtown Development Authority (DDA) to evaluate the impact of eliminating one or more travel lanes on Biscayne Boulevard/US-1 corridor betweewn SE 1st Street and NE 6th Street in Miami Downtown. The purpose of the project is to create a bicycle, pedestrian and transit supportive environment as well as activate the median for public and enconomic development opportunities. TYLI is condcuting travel demand forecasts (SERPM), traffic operations analysis using Synchro and ARTPLAN, safety studies, developing construction costs, 30% design plans as well as assessing environmental impacts to complete the technical evalaution for FDOT District Six review and approval. Key component of this project is extensive public involvement. TYLI conducted one-on-one stakeholder interviews with more than 12 entities and elected officials in the corridor and is hosting three public meetings over the project life cycle. In addition to citizen and tehincial advisory committee meetings, TYLI will present the findings to the City Commission for final approval and resolution. This project will culminate with the TYLI preparing and submitting a Final Concept Report and Lane Elimination Application to FDOT District Six. 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACH REQUIRED REFERENCE) Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category Reference Questionnaire for: (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) T. Y. Lin International Company: (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Benjamin Restrepo, PE (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Email BRestrepo@fortlauderdale.gov FAX:Telephone: Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: ___________________________ Completion Date: _____________________________ Project Budget: _______________________________ Project Number of Days: _______________________ Item Criteria Score (must be completed) 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 3 Quality of work. 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS Traffic and Transportation Engineering Services, Fort Lauderdale, FL Vikas Jain, AICP, GISP City of Fort Lauderdale 954-828-5216 Traffic and Transportation Engineering Services Ongoing 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 90 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Traffic and Transportation Engineering Services Fort Lauderdale, Florida Owner/Client: City of Fort Lauderdale Benjamin Restrepo, PE Transportation Planning Program Manager, Transportation and Mobility, 290 NE 3rd Ave., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 828-5216 brestrepo@fortlauderdale.gov Start Date: August 2011 Completion Date: to Present Key Staff Joe Yesbeck, PE Vikas Jain, AICP, GISP Darryl Dansby Jim Eriksen, PE Trung Nguyen, PE Cherry Xiong, PE Meaghan Capuano, PE Gus Schmidt, PE T.Y. Lin International (TYLI) provides support to the City of Fort Lauderdale, Transportation and Mobility (TAM) Department staff in preparing the gamut of multimodal transportation planning studies, traffic and transportation engineering plans, as well as serves as an extension of the staff to fulfill the Department's needs on a day-to-day basis. To date, TYLI has provide technical and professional services to TAM through the following task orders: 1. Traffic and Parking Study Reviews for 25 development projects 2. Lake Ridge Neighborhood Mobility Masterplan 3. Powerline Road/SR-845 Lane Elimination Application 4. Flagler Village Parking Supply and Demand Study 5. Downtown Walkability Design Project (Final Design) 6. NE 13 th Street Complete Streets Final Design 7. Las Olas Boulevard Traffic Workshop 8. Breakers Avenue Concept Design 9. Downtown Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) Traffic Review 10. Northwest CRA Streetcar Feasibility Study 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACH REQUIRED REFERENCE) Solicitation: 18-7432-MP Professional Services Library: Metropolitan Planning General Planning Services Category Reference Questionnaire for: (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) T. Y. Lin International (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: FAX:Telephone: Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: ___________________________ Completion Date: _____________________________ Project Budget: _______________________________ Project Number of Days: _______________________ Item Criteria Score (must be completed) 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 3 Quality of work. 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS Martin MPO Transportation Planning Services, Martin County, Florida Vikas Jain, AICP, GISP Beth Beltran Martin Metropolitan Planning Organization bbeltran@martin.fl.us 772.288.5484 2014-2023 Transit Development Plan, Major Update Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety Action Plan 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Ongoing Fee: $550,000 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 100 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Martin MPO Transportation Planning Services Martin County, Florida Owner/Client: Martin MPO Ms. Beth Beltran, MPO Administrator 3481 SE Willoughby Blvd, Suite 101, Stuart, FL 34994 (772) 288-5484 bbeltran@martin.fl.us Start Date: October 2012 Completion Date: Ongoing Fee: $550,000 Key Staff Joe Yesbeck, PE Vikas Jain, AICP, GISP Tom Errico, PE Rich Perrin, AICP Sara Gutekunst Nathan King Since 2012, under its Transportation Planning Services contract with the Martin Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), T.Y. Lin International provided techincal assistance and completed the following major projects: 1.2014-2023 Transit Development Plan, Major Update, Martin County 2. Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety Action Plan (BPSAP), Martin County 3. Professionl Techinical Adisory Services 4. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan These projects included conducting transportation and transit data collection, land use and demographic analysis, environemntal justice (EJ) analsyis, ridership forecasts, concept planning and engineering analysis amogst other techinical tasks. Further, TYLI conducted the MPO planning process and engaged with the MPO Advisory Committees and MPO Policy Board. A key component of MPO planning process required TYLI to conduct robust public invovlement and stakeholder engagement activities. Since 2019, TYLI staff is assisting the Martin MPO with its 2045 Long Range Transportaiton Plan (LRTP) called Martin in Motion. 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8Packet Pg. 658Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) INSURANCE AND BONDING REQUIREMENTS Insurance / Bond Type Required Limits 1.Worker’s Compensation Statutory Limits of Florida Statutes, Chapter 440 and all Federal Government Statutory Limits and Requirements Evidence of Workers’ Compensation coverage or a Certificate of Exemption issued by the State of Florida is required. Entities that are formed as Sole Proprietorships shall not be required to provide a proof of exemption. An application for exemption can be obtained online at https://apps.fldfs.com/bocexempt/ 2.Employer’s Liability $__500,000_ single limit per occurrence 3.Commercial General Liability (Occurrence Form) patterned after the current ISO form Bodily Injury and Property Damage $__1,000,000____single limit per occurrence, $2,000,000 aggregate for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. 4.Indemnification To the maximum extent permitted by Florida law, the Contractor/Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Collier County, its officers and employees from any and all liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees and paralegals’ fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Contractor/ Vendor or anyone employed or utilized by the Contractor/Vendor in the performance of this Agreement. 5.Automobile Liability $_500,000__ Each Occurrence; Bodily Injury & Property Damage, Owned/Non-owned/Hired; Automobile Included 6.Other insurance as noted: Watercraft $ __________ Per Occurrence United States Longshoreman's and Harborworker's Act coverage shall be maintained where applicable to the completion of the work. $ __________ Per Occurrence Maritime Coverage (Jones Act) shall be maintained where applicable to the completion of the work. $ __________ Per Occurrence Aircraft Liability coverage shall be carried in limits of not less than $5,000,000 each occurrence if applicable to the completion of the Services under this Agreement. $ __________ Per Occurrence Pollution $ __________ Per Occurrence Professional Liability $ _1,000,000__ Per claim & in the aggregate Project Professional Liability $__________ Per Occurrence Valuable Papers Insurance $__________ Per Occurrence Cyber Liability $__________ Per Occurrence Technology Errors & Omissions $__________ Per Occurrence 7.Bid bond Shall be submitted with proposal response in the form of certified funds, cashiers’ check or an irrevocable letter of credit, a cash bond posted with the County Clerk, or proposal bond in a sum equal to 5% of the cost proposal. All checks shall be made payable to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on a bank or trust company located in the State of Florida and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 668 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 8.Performance and Payment Bonds For projects in excess of $200,000, bonds shall be submitted with the executed contract by Proposers receiving award, and written for 100% of the Contract award amount, the cost borne by the Proposer receiving an award. The Performance and Payment Bonds shall be underwritten by a surety authorized to do business in the State of Florida and otherwise acceptable to Owner; provided, however, the surety shall be rated as “A-“ or better as to general policy holders rating and Class V or higher rating as to financial size category and the amount required shall not exceed 5% of the reported policy holders’ surplus, all as reported in the most current Best Key Rating Guide, published by A.M. Best Company, Inc. of 75 Fulton Street, New York, New York 10038. 9.Vendor shall ensure that all subcontractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Vendor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. 10.Collier County must be named as "ADDITIONAL INSURED" on the Insurance Certificate for Commercial General Liability where required. This insurance shall be primary and non-contributory with respect to any other insurance maintained by, or available for the benefit of, the Additional Insured and the Vendor’s policy shall be endorsed accordingly. 11.The Certificate Holder shall be named as Collier County Board of County Commissioners, OR, Board of County Commissioners in Collier County, OR Collier County Government, OR Collier County. The Certificates of Insurance must state the Contract Number, or Project Number, or specific Project description, or must read: For any and all work performed on behalf of Collier County. 12.On all certificates, the Certificate Holder must read: Collier County Board of County Commissioners, 3295 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 13.Thirty (30) Days Cancellation Notice required. 14.Collier County shall procure and maintain Builders Risk Insurance on all construction projects where it is deemed necessary. Such coverage shall be endorsed to cover the interests of Collier County as well as the Contractor. Premiums shall be billed to the project and the Contractor shall not include Builders Risk premiums in its project proposal or project billings. All questions regarding Builder’s Risk Insurance will be addressed by the Collier County Risk Management Division. 7/6/20 - CC ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vendor’s Insurance Statement We understand the insurance requirements of these specifications and that the evidence of insurability may be required within five (5) days of the award of this solicitation. The insurance submitted must provide coverage for a minimum of six (6) months from the date of award. Name of Firm ___T. Y. Lin International_____________________ Date ___8-5-2020________________ Vendor Signature _________________________________________________________________________ Print Name ___James Molnar_________________________________________________________________ Insurance Agency _Dealey, Renton & Associates_____________________________________________________ Agent Name Nancy Ferrick__________________________ Telephone Number __510-465-3090 ______________ 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Ron DeSantis, GovernorSTATE OF FLORIDABOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERSTHE ENGINEERING BUSINESS HEREIN IS AUTHORIZED UNDER THEPROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTEST. Y. LIN INTERNATIONALDo not alter this document in any form.345 CALIFORNIA STREETLICENSE NUMBER: CA2017EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2021This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document.SUITE 2300SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com9.E.8Packet Pg. 670Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Florida Department of Transportation RON DESANTIS GOVERNOR 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 KEVIN J. THIBAULT, P.E. SECRETARY www.fdot.gov June 14, 2019 Mariano Valle, Senior Vice President T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL 201 Alhambra Circle, Suite 900 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Dear Mr. Valle: The Florida Department of Transportation has reviewed your application for prequalification package and determined that the data submitted is adequate to technically prequalify your firm for the following types of work: Group 2 - Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) Studies Group 3 - Highway Design - Roadway 3.1 - Minor Highway Design 3.2 - Major Highway Design 3.3 - Controlled Access Highway Design Group 4 - Highway Design - Bridges 4.1.1 - Miscellaneous Structures 4.1.2 - Minor Bridge Design 4.2.1 - Major Bridge Design - Concrete 4.2.2 - Major Bridge Design - Steel Group 5 - Bridge Inspection 5.1 - Conventional Bridge Inspection 5.3 - Complex Bridge Inspection 5.4 - Bridge Load Rating Group 6 - Traffic Engineering and Operations Studies 6.1 - Traffic Engineering Studies Group 7 - Traffic Operations Design 7.1 - Signing, Pavement Marking and Channelization 7.2 - Lighting 7.3 - Signalization Group 10 - Construction Engineering Inspection 10.1 - Roadway Construction Engineering Inspection 10.4 - Minor Bridge & Miscellaneous Structures CEI 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) www.fdot.gov Group 11 - Engineering Contract Administration and Management Group 13 - Planning 13.4 - Systems Planning 13.5 - Subarea/Corridor Planning 13.6 - Land Planning/Engineering 13.7 - Transportation Statistics Your firm is now technically prequalified with the Department for Professional Services in the above referenced work types. The overhead audit has been accepted, and your firm may pursue projects in the referenced work types with fees of any dollar amount. This status shall be valid until June 30, 2020 for contracting purposes. Approved Rates Home/ Branch Overhead Field Overhead Facilities Capital Cost of Money Premium Overtime Reimburse Actual Expenses Home Direct Expense Field Direct Expense 150.31% 114.17% 0.306% Excluded No 0.60% 1.93%* *Rent and utilities excluded from field office rate. These costs will be directly reimbursed on contracts that require the consultant to provide field office. Per Title 23, U.S. Code 112, there are restrictions on sharing indirect cost rates. Refer to Code for additional information. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me by email at carliayn.kell@dot.state.fl.us or by phone at 850-414-4597. Sincerely, Carliayn Kell Professional Services Qualification Administrator 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL District Grade Averages by Work Group Professional Services Information System Design Consultant Grades (for Letters of Interest, Design/Build) Sorted by Consultant Name and Graded Type of Work For District 1 Work Type Cont #Dist Contract Description Qual Schd Mgmt Const Composite Grade * Ratio (Composite Grade/Dist Avg) Date of Last Eval. Project Mgr. 4.1.1 C9M73 1 Continuous Services Contract 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.0 3.0/3.6 15FEB2018 Morton, Keilia 4.1.2 C9M73 1 Continuous Services Contract 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1/3.6 15FEB2018 Morton, Keilia 4.2.1 C8W41 1 D/W BRIDGE ENG. DESIGN/CEI 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.0 4.0/3.6 10DEC2014 LOESER, BENJAMIN 4.2.1 C9808 1 D/W BRIDGE ENGINEERING DESIGN 3.9 4.2 3.9 4.0 4.0/3.6 04SEP2015 KUNHARDT, MARIA 4.2.1 C9H17 1 BRIDGE ENGINEERING DESIGN 4.0 4.6 4.1 4.2 4.2/3.6 09OCT2015 KUNHARDT, MARIA 4.2.1 C9214 1 D/W BRIDGE ENGINEERING SERVICE 3.9 4.2 4.1 4.0 4.0/3.6 09NOV2015 KUNHARDT, MARIA 4.4 C8W41 1 D/W BRIDGE ENG. DESIGN/CEI 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.7/3.6 08JAN2015 LOESER, BENJAMIN Grade Averages for Work Group 4 :3.7 3.8 3.7 3.7 5.2 C8W41 1 D/W BRIDGE ENG. DESIGN/CEI 4.3 4.0 3.8 4.1 4.1/4.1 09JAN2015 LOESER, BENJAMIN Grade Averages for Work Group 5 :4.3 4.0 3.8 4.1 Consultant Grade Averages for All Work Types:3.7 3.8 3.7 3.8 All grades are subject to rounding. Schedule(S) = Average of all Schedule Grades Management(M) = Average of all Management Grades Quality(Q) = Average of all Quality Grades Constructability(C) = Average of all Constructability Grades Composite = Average of all Composite Grades If Constructability Grade is given then Composite Grade= (0.25xS)+(0.25xM)+(0.25xQ)+(0.25xC) For all others, Composite Grade= (0.25xS)+(0.25xM)+(0.50xQ) *Ratio of Average Grade for Contract to District Average for Workgroup District Average for Work Group = Average of all consultant contract grades in the work group for that district. Work Group District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 8 District 9 Page 1 of 2Design Consultant Grades for Letters of Interest, Design/Build 9/26/2019https://fdotewp1.dot.state.fl.us/sasweb/cgi-bin/broker.exe 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 2 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.4 3.5 3 3.5 3.7 3.3 3.8 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.2 3.7 4 3.6 3.9 3.4 3.8 3.5 3.9 3.9 3.1 4.4 5 4.1 4.7 3.2 4.3 4.0 4.0 N/A 4.1 N/A 6 3.7 3.9 3.6 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.2 3.0 4.3 7 3.5 3.9 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.1 3.7 8 3.3 3.9 3.4 3.6 3.2 3.6 3.4 3.3 3.4 9 3.8 4.1 3.8 3.7 3.6 4.2 4.1 3.7 4.0 10 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.8 3.6 3.7 4.0 11 3.9 4.2 4.0 4.3 3.7 4.2 N/A 4.0 4.2 13 4.0 4.0 4.3 3.9 3.5 3.7 4.7 4.0 3.9 14 4.0 3.4 N/A 3.0 3.3 3.7 N/A 3.0 3.8 15 3.4 3.5 3.1 3.9 3.8 3.3 N/A 3.8 N/A 21 3.5 N/A 3.3 3.1 3.3 N/A N/A 4.1 N/A 22 N/A N/A 3.4 3.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 24 4.0 N/A 3.2 3.1 3.3 N/A N/A 4.0 N/A 25 N/A N/A N/A 3.0 3.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A 99 N/A N/A 3.3 3.8 3.6 3.8 4.0 3.7 4.0 This request took 3.58 seconds of real time (v9.4 build 1509). Page 2 of 2Design Consultant Grades for Letters of Interest, Design/Build 9/26/2019https://fdotewp1.dot.state.fl.us/sasweb/cgi-bin/broker.exe 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Florida Department of Transportation RON DESANTIS GOVERNOR 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 KEVIN J. THIBAULT, P.E. SECRETARY Safety, Mobility, Innovation www.fdot.gov June 15, 2020 Lynette Wuensch, President EPR, P.C. 902 East Jefferson Street, Unit 101 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Dear Ms. Wuensch: The Florida Department of Transportation has reviewed your application for prequalification package and determined that the data submitted is adequate to technically prequalify your firm for the following types of work: Group 6 - Traffic Engineering and Operations Studies 6.1 - Traffic Engineering Studies 6.2 - Traffic Signal Timing Group 7 - Traffic Operations Design 7.1 - Signing, Pavement Marking and Channelization 7.2 - Lighting 7.3 - Signalization Group 13 - Planning 13.3 - Policy Planning 13.4 - Systems Planning 13.5 - Subarea/Corridor Planning 13.6 - Land Planning/Engineering 13.7 - Transportation Statistics Your firm is now technically prequalified with the Department for Professional Services in the above referenced work types. The overhead audit has been accepted, and your firm may pursue projects in the referenced work types with fees of any dollar amount. This status shall be valid until June 30, 2021 for contracting purposes. Approved Rates Home/ Branch Overhead Facilities Capital Cost of Money Premium Overtime Reimburse Actual Expenses Home Direct Expense 125.11% 0.233% Reimbursed No 0.00% Per Title 23, U.S. Code 112, there are restrictions on sharing indirect cost rates. Refer to Code for additional information. 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Safety, Mobility, Innovation www.fdot.gov Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me by email at carliayn.kell@dot.state.fl.us or by phone at 850-414-4597. Sincerely, Carliayn Kell Professional Services Qualification Administrator 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Addendum 1 Date: July 7, 2020 From: Evelyn Colon, Procurement Strategist To: Interested Bidders Subject: Addendum # 1: 18-7432-MP-Metropolitan Planning The following change is made to the above-mentioned Collier County solicitation: •This Addendum is to add the insurance requirements: Please see the attached Insurance Requirements form. If you require additional information, please post a question on the Online Bidding site or contact me at the information noted above. Please sign below and return a copy of this Addendum with your submittal for the above referenced solicitation. (Signature) 8-5-2020 Date T. Y. Lin International (Name of Firm) Email: Evelyn.Colon@colliercountyfl.gov Telephone: (239) 252-2667 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) Addendum 2 Date: July 14, 2020 From: Evelyn Colon, Procurement Strategist To: Interested Bidders Subject: Addendum # 2: 18-7432-MP-Metropolitan Planning The following change is made to the above-mentioned Collier County solicitation: •This Addendum is to correct the bid due date: RPS OPENING DAY/DATE/TIME: AUGUST 6, 2019 AT 3:00PM AUGUST 6, 2020 AT 3:00PM If you require additional information, please post a question on the Online Bidding site or contact me at the information noted above. Please sign below and return a copy of this Addendum with your submittal for the above referenced solicitation. (Signature) 8-5-2020 Date T. Y. Lin International (Name of Firm) Email: Evelyn.Colon@colliercountyfl.gov Telephone: (239) 252-2667 9.E.8 Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: TY Lin Proposal (14171 : Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS 18-7432-MP) 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study OBJECTIVE: For the Board to review and endorse the Collier Area Transit (CAT) Park and Ride Study. CONSIDERATIONS: In 2005, a Park & Ride Study was conducted and found that there were favorable conditions and locations for Park & Ride facilities within the County. There has been significant development in the County since that time, thus an update was needed to reflect the current and planned conditions. Collier Area Transit (CAT) and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) hired the consulting team of Jacobs to identify and develop a standardized methodology for locating, operating, and maintaining Park & Ride Sites within Collier County. The Park and Ride Study (Attachment 1) was performed in conjunction with and will be incorporated by reference into the MPO’S 2045 Long Range Plan (LRTP) and the CAT Transit Development Plan (TDP) 2021-2030. This Study is ultimately is being thought of as a method to help address impacts of traffic congestion and parking constraints at some facilities. Park and Ride Facilities provide areas where commuters can park and take public transit, carpool, or vanpool into more urban areas. This Study also documents and prioritizes sites and provides implementation strategies to successfully locate potential lots near multimodal facilities, such as transit, pathways, sidewalks, or bike lanes, providing access to alternative transportation modes for travelers. There were 32 sites evaluated and discussed in the Study, of those 10 sites were identified as priority sites and 4 sites were identified as alternates to priority sites. The Study also provided Park and Ride facility types descriptions, lot size and cost estimates for priority sites, possible funding options for priority sites, and provided the County with a Park and Ride Handbook (Attachment 2) containing site evaluation methodology and evaluation forms developed as part of this study. Jacobs will be presenting the Board with a brief overview of the Park and Ride Study. The Board of County Commissioners will be reviewing the study for adoption on December 8th. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Collier County Public Transit Advisory Committee, Technical Advisory Committee and the Citizens Advisory Committee voted to endorse the CAT Park and Ride study. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board review and endorse the CAT Park and Ride Study. Prepared By: Josephine Medina, Senior Planner Please note -due to the size of the document with Appendixes A-E resulted in 414 pages, all Appendixes were not included in the agenda packet attachment. The study with Appendixes A-E included is available for download at: <https://www.colliermpo.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Park-and-Ride-Study_Nov2020.pdf> 9.F Packet Pg. 680 11/13/2020 ATTACHMENT(S) 1. CAT Park and Ride Study (PDF) 2. Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (PDF) 9.F Packet Pg. 681 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 9.F Doc ID: 14184 Item Summary: Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 2:58 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 2:58 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:04 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:07 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 9.F Packet Pg. 682 Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study November 2020 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF i Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 2. Study Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Research .........................................................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Site Identification ........................................................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Site Evaluation .............................................................................................................................................2-2 2.4 Public Participation ....................................................................................................................................2-3 3. Site Identification ........................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Priority Sites from CUTR Report ............................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Commute Patterns .....................................................................................................................................3-2 3.2.1 Deficient Corridors .....................................................................................................................3-2 3.2.2 Regional Interconnectivity .......................................................................................................3-4 3.2.3 Demographics ..............................................................................................................................3-4 3.2.4 Land Use ........................................................................................................................................3-6 3.3 Beach Facilities ............................................................................................................................................3-7 3.4 Candidate Locations Based on Stakeholder Input ..........................................................................3-8 3.5 Proposed Park-and-Ride Sites ...............................................................................................................3-9 4. Site Design ....................................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Facility Types ................................................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Lot Size Estimation .....................................................................................................................................4-1 5. Site Evaluations ............................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Evaluation Ranking .....................................................................................................................................5-1 5.2 Priority Sites ..................................................................................................................................................5-1 5.3 Alternate Sites ..............................................................................................................................................5-3 5.3.1 Alternates for Public-Private Partnerships ........................................................................5-4 5.3.2 Alternates for Developed Lots ...............................................................................................5-4 5.3.3 Phased Development ................................................................................................................5-4 6. Cost Estimates ................................................................................................................................................. 6-1 7. Funding Sources ............................................................................................................................................. 7-1 7.1 Federal Funding ..........................................................................................................................................7-1 7.2 State Funding ...............................................................................................................................................7-2 7.3 Local Funding ...............................................................................................................................................7-4 7.4 Alternative Funding Strategies ..............................................................................................................7-4 8. Recommendations and Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1 Best Practices ...............................................................................................................................................8-1 8.2 Property Acquisition and Lease Agreements ....................................................................................8-1 8.3 Promotion of the Facilities.......................................................................................................................8-2 8.4 Park-and-Ride Handbook ........................................................................................................................8-2 9. References ........................................................................................................................................................ 9-1 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF ii Appendices Appendix A. Park-and-Ride Research Memorandum Appendix B. Park-and-Ride Handbook Appendix C. Public Involvement Appendix D. Site Evaluation Results and Demographic Maps Appendix E. Site Design and Cost Estimates Tables Table 3-1. 2005 Priority Locations ............................................................................................................................ 3-2 Table 3-2. Proposed Park-and-Ride Locations Serving Deficient Corridors ................................................... 3-3 Table 3-3. Proposed Park-and-Ride Locations for Regional Interconnectivity .............................................. 3-4 Table 3-4. Proposed Park-and-Ride Locations Based on Employee Commute Patterns ............................ 3-6 Table 3-5. Beach Parking Demand (2017–2019) .................................................................................................. 3-7 Table 3-6. Beach Capacity Total Turnarounds (2017–2019) ............................................................................. 3-8 Table 3-7. Proposed Park-and-Ride Locations for Beach Access ...................................................................... 3-8 Table 3-8. Proposed Park-and-Ride Locations Based on Stakeholder Input ................................................. 3-9 Table 4-1. Types of Park-and-Ride Facilities .......................................................................................................... 4-1 Table 5-1. Final Evaluation Rankings ....................................................................................................................... 5-2 Table 7-1. Federal Funding Sources ......................................................................................................................... 7-1 Table 7-2. State Funding Sources ............................................................................................................................. 7-3 Figures Figure 1-1. Benefits of Using Park-and-Ride .......................................................................................................... 1-1 Figure 1-2. Florida Park-and-Ride Locations (2020) ........................................................................................... 1-2 Figure 2-1. Guide Sign from Main Arterial .............................................................................................................. 2-1 Figure 3-1. Priority Locations from 2005 ................................................................................................................ 3-1 Figure 3-2. Top Zip Codes for Home vs. Work Area ............................................................................................... 3-5 Figure 3-3. Collier County Employment and Residency ...................................................................................... 3-5 Figure 3-4. Final Proposed Site Locations ............................................................................................................ 3-10 Figure 3-5. Close Up of Final Proposed Site Locations ..................................................................................... 3-11 Figure 5-1. Recommended Priority Sites (Including Alternative Locations) .................................................. 5-3 Figure 7-1. Seed to Table Park-and-Ride lot .......................................................................................................... 7-4 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF iii Acronyms and Abbreviations AUIR Annual Update Inventory Report B&A boarding and alighting CAT Collier Area Transit CDP Census-designated place CUTR Center for Urban Transportation Research FDOT Florida Department of Transportation FTA Federal Transit Administration FY fiscal year LeeTran Lee County Transit LOS level of service LRTP Long Range Transportation Plan MOD Mobility on Demand MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization MUTCD Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices PL priority location PPP Public Participation Plan ROW right-of-way SIS Strategic Intermodal System STP Surface Transportation Program TDC Tourist Development Council TDP Transit Development Plan TIP Transportation Improvement Program USF University of South Florida 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 1-1 1. Introduction As the population of Collier County (hereafter, “the County”) continues to increase, traffic congestion has become a growing concern on the County’s arterial network. The County is considering development of park-and-ride facilities to help alleviate some of the congestion, providing areas where commuters can park and take public transit, carpool, or vanpool into more urban areas. Figure 1-1 illustrates the many benefits to using park-and-ride facilities. This approach is popular throughout the state as evidenced by the numerous park-and-ride facilities in urban and urban core areas within Florida, indicating these facilities are primarily correlated around interstates and highways (refer to Figure 1-2). Ideal locations for park-and-ride lots would serve congested roadways and target regional and local commuter trips, such as work, shopping, the beach, or the airport, to reduce the number of vehicles on those heavily congested corridors. In 2005, Collier County addressed park-and-ride strategies by commissioning a study by the University of South Florida (USF) Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) (USF 2005) that identified primary transportation corridors, including major roads and the fixed-route public transit networks provided by Collier Area Transit (CAT) and Lee County Transit (LeeTran). The study developed a list of 32 possible sites that were evaluated and then further refined to 12 prioritized park-and-ride sites. Since that time, continuous population growth, commercial develop- ment, and the expanded CAT system have changed the “existing conditions” and the study is now outdated. Thus, an update is needed to reflect current and planned conditions. This Park-and-Ride Study updates the analysis and recommendations from the 2005 CUTR Report by confirming whether the park-and-ride locations previously identified are still suitable and by identifying additional sites to address changing land use in the County, regional commuter and transit travel patterns, and the CAT system. This Study was performed in conjunction with the ongoing Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) update (Jacobs 2020) and the CAT Transit Development Plan (TDP) to update the park-and-ride strategies and prioritized sites for the County. The new proposed sites are designed to take advantage of existing infrastructure whenever possible and use County-owned parcels where practical. This Study documents and prioritizes sites and provides implementation strategies to successfully integrate additional park-and-ride locations into the multimodal transportation system currently serving the County. Park-and-ride lots provide options for commuters and other travelers who can benefit from carpooling or who need reliable transit options in the County, including businesses, recreational facilities, or schools. In addition to helping address the impacts of traffic congestion and parking constraints at some facilities, park-and-ride lots offer transit service for individuals without personal transportation and who need viable options to and from work or other activities. Locating potential lots near multimodal facilities, such as transit, pathways, sidewalks, or bike lanes, provides access to alternative transportation modes for travelers. Figure 1-1. Benefits of Using Park-and-Ride 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 1-2 Figure 1-2. Florida Park-and-Ride Locations (2020) 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 1-3 Park-and-ride facilities serve as conveniences to commuters and may be promoted to reduce the demand for limited traffic capacity during peak travel hours. To entice commuters to give up their cars for sub- stantial portions of their daily trips, park-and-ride facilities must be conveniently located. This means commuters must not have to drive far to the park-and-ride site. In addition, the site should not be in a direction contrary to the commuters’ work or other destination. Park-and-ride facilities should be located to capture the maximum portion of the common “trunk” trips of commuters. The major trunk of travel for commuter trips in Collier and Lee Counties is I-75. Therefore, park-and-ride facilities should be provided as close as possible to the interchanges. There are several northbound/southbound and eastbound/westbound roadways that are also used for major commuting patterns within the County. A common commuting pattern for residents travelling to work is westbound in the morning and eastbound in the evening. Some of the major eastbound/ westbound arterials and major collectors include Immokalee Road, Vanderbilt Beach Road, Pine Ridge Road, Golden Gate Parkway, and Golden Gate Boulevard. Some of the major arterials for northbound/ southbound trips in Collier County include US 41, Goodlette-Frank Road, Airport Road, Livingston Road, Santa Barbara Boulevard, SR 29, and Collier Boulevard. Therefore, park-and-ride facilities serving work patterns should be located as close as possible to these major roadways. Promoting transit and personal mobility options are areas of growing interest in the County as the population steadily increases and it becomes costly and impractical to add capacity to the local roadways and intersections because of right-of-way (ROW) requirements, drainage, and environmental concerns. The County has successfully implemented intercounty transit service options within the County limits and continues to explore additional public transportation connections to link residents with nearby jobs, services, and tourist destinations. An implementable, cost-effective, and well-vetted park-and-ride strategy is an important component of an effective and wholistic transit system, helping to extend the reach of the available transit services to attract new users and offer alternatives to commuters. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 2-1 2. Study Methodology 2.1 Research The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) State Park-and-Ride Guide (FDOT 2012) provides a basis for planning, site selection, site evaluation, site size estimation, and funding options. In addition to FDOT guidelines, the 2005 CUTR Report (USF 2005) was reviewed and comparable programs in Florida and throughout the U.S were researched. The goal of the review was to identify strategies to increase local demand and use and to identify the best practices that may be integrated into park-and-ride lots within the County. The studies were also reviewed for conventional and innovative funding strategies for developing, implementing, and maintaining park-and-ride lots and programs. Strategies and best practices identified during the research were analyzed for their application to both existing and planned lots within the County. Top recommendations for the County include: • Enhance online resources, such as a webpage dedicated to the park-and-ride program detailing the overall vision, benefits of its use, and identification of each site or lot with photos and descriptions of each location. • Install guide signs off main arterials, per Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (FHWA 2009), to advertise and direct users to the lots in addition to the entrance of the lot (refer to Figure 2-1). • Provide park-and-ride at transfer stations to serve a wide variety of commute patterns. This could include a designated lot or shared-use parking at an existing lot. • Provide an additional sense of security by locating lots adjacent to the sheriff facilities, or by installing lighting, video surveillance, and fencing with timed gates. • Offer direct shuttles and vanpooling to accommodate participants in employment-based or destination-specific lots. Another economical strategy is to lease parking spaces within private properties, such as shopping plazas or churches. Leased spaces can include the condition that park-and-ride spaces are only available for weekdays or weekends if serving both the lot’s demand and the targeted ridership. For example, if the targeted ridership is employee commuters (weekdays) and the proposed location is to lease spaces from a church (high demand on weekends), providing spaces only during weekdays could offer a more attractive public-private partnership than without such an arrangement. Appendix A provides further details on the research findings and recommendations. 2.2 Site Identification To ensure a thorough list of potential sites, several criteria were analyzed to identify ideal sites for future locations. Locations were predominantly proposed along existing and planned transit routes that have the highest potential to serve as park-and-ride lots. Sites were identified first based on locations within the County where informal park-and-ride already occurs. Sites were evaluated to serve major employment, educational, and tourism destinations. Research included the review of the TDP, LRTP, U.S. Census Bureau data, Land Development Regulations, land use patterns, and cell phone (global positioning system directional and delay) travel data. The U.S. Census Bureau data were used to identify employment figures and commute patterns. The Annual Update Figure 2-1. Guide Sign from Main Arterial Source: MUTCD (FHWA 2009) 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 2-2 Inventory Report (AUIR) was used to identify existing and projected congested corridors. Sites were also identified based on stakeholder input. A similar analysis should be used for identifying any future lot locations considered within the County. The following factors provided the basis for selecting potential sites in the County: • Location, dimensions, and ownership of potential site • Existing ingress/egress and multimodal access to the site • Safety and security, such as lighting and cameras • Estimated costs to acquire or lease site • Estimated operating costs • Estimated costs to construct the park-and-ride lot • Estimated transit/park-and-ride demand at site (that is, existing and latent demand for transit route and bus stop) 2.3 Site Evaluation To evaluate and prioritize potential sites, evaluation criteria using the FDOT State Park-and-Ride Guide (FDOT 2012) site selection evaluation methodology were developed and included scoring based on such factors as location and economic feasibility. These criteria were then tailored to the needs of the County. The ranking of the criteria helps identify which locations along existing and planned transit routes have the highest potential as successful park-and-ride lots. The sites were analyzed and ranked based on the following core conditions: • Visibility - Is the site easy to find or close to a primary roadway? • Location - Is the site close to key activity area (businesses, stores, retail)? Is the site near a pathway or major roadway? Is the property available? Are property owners on developed land in favor of a lease agreement? • Access - Is there easy access in and out of the site? If traffic makes it consistently difficult to access the facility, customers will be discouraged from using it. • Transit Linkage - Does the site offer a broad range of route options? Potential near-term linkages between CAT and LeeTran will also need to be addressed. • Cost - Is it cost-effective to develop this site? A currently developed site would cost less as an initial investment. The ranking of prioritized sites entails both a qualitative and quantitative analysis. Sites must first pass the initial screening for feasibility and effectiveness (qualitative). Feasible sites were then evaluated using the evaluation criteria, which provided scoring to rank and prioritize the potential success of the site (quantita- tive). A team consisting of representatives from CAT, Collier MPO, and Jacobs jointly developed the evaluation criteria. The project team assigned weighting to each question to tailor the assessment to County conditions. The weightings reflect the locations’ viability for a park-and-ride as well as its anticipated level of success. The weightings are designated as follows: • 1 - Basic site requirement • 2 - Desirable benefit for the site • 3 - Significant benefit to the success of the site 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 2-3 Site evaluation methodology was prepared to explain the objective and scoring options for each question within the evaluation criteria. This Study uses the FDOT State Park-and-Ride Guide evaluation criteria and the site evaluation methodology, so the evaluation herein can be performed for any potential locations under consideration by CAT. Refer to Appendix B for the methodology and evaluation forms developed as part of this Study. Note: A discrepancy exists within some site maps on the site evaluation forms. Revised routes are not reflected on the site maps, as the GIS files were being updated by CAT. However, the latest route layouts were incorporated into the scoring for question 2 of the Site Evaluation Forms. The CAT interactive map was used to evaluate question 2 and the scoring of each site was based on the latest revised route layout (for example, R121 and R28). 2.4 Public Participation The Collier MPO developed a Public Participation Plan (PPP) to identify outreach activities, outline methods that will be used to measure outreach effectiveness, and ensure that relevant activities align with the Collier MPO’s guiding principles. The PPP outlines a strategy for leveraging existing outreach and acquiring the necessary new data through the public involvement process. Consistent with the Collier MPO PPP, a Park-and-Ride Study PPP was developed to reach all demographic groups including, but not limited to, commuters, students, large employers, transportation disadvantaged, senior citizens, and the disabled community (refer to Appendix C for the Park-and-Ride Study PPP). For purposes of consistency and efficiency with the LRTP, the outreach efforts for this Park-and-Ride Study mimic the LRTP, with some project-specific required adjustments to ensure swift committee and board approval. However, because of stay-at-home orders resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, planned public meetings were cancelled and were no longer feasible within the timeline of this Study. The Park- and-Ride Study PPP was modified to accommodate the stay-at-home orders. However, the original Park- and-Ride Study PPP is also provided in Appendix C to apply to any future public participation regarding park-and-ride studies for the County. The modified PPP used electronic forms of communication and included outreach via email and online surveys. PowerPoint presentations were made available to organization representatives for discussion and feedback regarding the organization’s needs and potential site locations. The PowerPoint presentations were provided through the Microsoft Teams platform and in person (prior to the issuance of stay-at-home orders) and included the following organizations: • Collier MPO Board • Technical Advisory Committee • Citizen’s Advisory Committee • Congestion Management Committee • Collier County Parks & Recreation Division • Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce • Arthrex (large employer) • Enterprise Rent-a-Car (vanpools for Collier County) • Collier County Tourism Division • LeeTran The key stakeholder identified for each organization was provided links to the online survey to further distribute to obtain feedback. Additional stakeholders within the Collier MPO’s adviser network and large area employers within the County were identified and provided a handout describing the project with links to the public survey, but none of the organizations requested a PowerPoint presentation. These organizations included, but were not limited to, representatives of the disabled community, Walmart, Target, Publix, Naples 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 2-4 Community Hospital, Bayshore and Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency, the Restaurant and Lodging Association, and the Chambers of Commerce for Greater Naples, Immokalee, Marco Island, and Everglades City. Appendix C includes a copy of the distributed handout. The online public survey was also promoted using several other platforms to enhance public participation from participants outside demographic and employer organizations. The handout information and survey links were posted on the MPO and CAT websites and on CAT social media. The MPO published the link and project summary in their newsletter, which is distributed to the MPO’s entire adviser network. CAT emailed all County employees the handout and survey links, and fliers with the survey links were posted in each CAT bus to encourage ridership response. Refer to Appendix C for results of the public participation surveys. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 3-1 3. Site Identification This section summarizes proposed sites reviewed as part of this Study. The site identification process described within Section 2.2 should be reevaluated if conditions change in the County for any future lots considered. It should be noted that proposed sites can serve multiple areas, patterns, and needs. 3.1 Priority Sites from CUTR Report The 2005 CUTR Report identified 46 potential sites and recommended 12 sites as potential priority sites (USF 2005). These 12 priority sites were evaluated and identified in Table 3-1 with the Site ID beginning with “PL” (priority location). Because land development and the transportation network in the County has experienced major growth since the 2005 study, the potential priority locations were reevaluated for feasibility and likelihood of success, with some sites being relocated or removed as applicable. Refer to Figure 3-1 for the relocated or removed priority sites within County jurisdiction. Figure 3-1. Priority Locations from 2005 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 3-2 Table 3-1. 2005 Priority Locations Source: 2005 CUTR Report (USF 2005) Proposed Location/ Description for Site Park-and- Ride Site ID Notes Walmart, exit 111 off I-75 PL-1 Proposed using existing spaces on the shared-use lot. Heritage Bay PL-2 Northeast corner of Immokalee Rd. and Collier Blvd. Evaluated at the new Government Services Center at Heritage Bay. Immokalee Rd., intersection of CAT Blue Route, Marco Express, Immokalee Circulator, and future LeeTran connections PL-3 Evaluated at SL-3, approximately 200 feet south of the intersection described (East Main St. and Immokalee Rd.). USDA Center and Fairgrounds, Immokalee Rd and 39th Ave. NE PL-4 Refer to site name as Agricultural Center and Fairgrounds. Proposed using existing spaces at the parking lot. Vacant lot behind Wilson Blvd. gas station PL-5 Corner of Golden Gate Blvd. and Wilson Blvd. Relocated to SL-14 (Golden Gate & 1st Street NW) as County will acquire property. Proposed location less than 0.15 miles away. Vacant lot west of Elizabeth Ann Seton Catholic Church and School PL-6 Removed because there is an existing park-and-ride at the Golden Gate Library approximately 0.5 miles away. Coastland Mall PL-7 Southeast corner of Golden Gate Pkwy. and US 41. Proposed using existing spaces on the shared-use lot. Parkway Plaza Shopping Center PL-8 Golden Gate Pkwy./Coronado Pkwy. Removed because there is an existing park-and-ride at the Golden Gate Library less than 0.15 miles away. Freedom Square Shopping Center PL-9 Proposed using existing spaces; however, if new lot is developed, excellent location to serve as a transfer station. Naples Outlet Mall PL-10 Proposed using existing spaces on the shared-use lot. Ave Maria University PL-11 Development Order indicates Ave Maria to promote transit. Miromar Outlets PL-12 Removed because it is located in Estero, FL (not within the County’s jurisdiction and outside study area). 3.2 Commute Patterns Employment data and commute patterns were reviewed for major employers in the County. The employment commute patterns were reviewed in conjunction with existing and planned deficient corridors identified in the AUIR (Collier County 2019) and proposed developments in the County. 3.2.1 Deficient Corridors Based on forecasted traffic volumes, roadways or segments that are not projected to achieve the adopted minimum acceptable level of service (LOS E), as identified in the Growth Management Plan, are classified as deficient. To address existing and projected deficiencies within the County, sites were targeted immedi- ately upstream the direction of travel for the deficient segment. Sites were provided to address each 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 3-3 deficient roadway as identified in the 2019 AUIR (refer to Table 3-2) with deficiencies projected to 2029. Refer to Appendix D for a map of evaluation sites in relation to the deficient segments. Table 3-2. Proposed Park-and-Ride Locations Serving Deficient Corridors Source: 2019 AUIR Update Deficiencies Report Deficient Segment Park-and-Ride Site ID Movement Served Old US 41 (US 41 to Lee County Line) and Tamiami Trail E. (Immokalee Rd. to Wiggins Pass Rd.) SL-15; SL-1 Proposed sites serving each direction. Immokalee Rd. (Goodlette-Frank Rd. to Livingston Rd.) PL-1; SL-15 Proposed sites serving each direction. Immokalee Rd. (I-75 to Santa Barbara Blvd. to Everglades Blvd. and Oil Well Rd.) SL-5; SL-17 for east side; SL-16; PL-2 Proposed sites serving each direction. Randall Blvd. (Immokalee Rd. to Everglades Blvd.) SL-5, PL-3, PL-4, Pl-11 Proposed sites serving each direction. Goodlette-Frank (Vanderbilt Beach Rd. to Immokalee Rd.) SL-15; SL-25 Proposed sites serving each direction. Pine Ridge Rd. (Airport Rd. to I-75) SL-18, SL-24; SL-7 Proposed sites serving each direction. Golden Gate Pkwy. (Goodlette-Frank Rd. to I-75) SL-18; SL-8; PL-8; PL-7 Proposed sites serving each direction. Wilson Blvd. (Vanderbilt Beach Rd. to Randall Blvd.) SL-14, SL-5, SL-17, Also supported by the existing park-and-ride at the Golden Gate Estates Library. Site to alleviate congestion heading southbound in the morning and northbound in the afternoon. Collier Blvd. (Manatee Rd. to Mainsail Dr.) PL-9, PL-10, SL-13 Existing park-and-ride at the Marco Island Library serves commuters heading northbound in the morning. Proposed sites to alleviate congestion heading southbound in the morning and northbound in the afternoon. Tamiami Trail (Airport Rd. to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd.) SL-11, SL-20 Proposed sites serving each direction. Collier Blvd. (Davis Blvd. to I-75) SL-21, PL-9, PL-10, SL-13, SL-8, SL-9 Surrounding sites serving each direction. Pine Ridge Rd. (Shirley St. to I-75) SL-7, SL-18 Proposed sites serving each direction. Golden Gate Pkwy. (Santa Barbara Blvd. to Collier Blvd.) SL-8, PL-6, PL-2, SL-9 Surrounding sites serving each direction. Serving vehicles going through this corridor (destination not in corridor). Tamiami Trail E. (Greenway Rd. to San Marco Dr.) PL9, PL-10, SL-13, SL-23 Proposed sites serving each direction. SR-82 (Lee County Line to SR 29) SL-3, SL-22 Proposed sites serving westbound in the morning and eastbound in the evening. Immokalee Rd (Collier Blvd. to Oil Well Rd.) PL-2, PL-4, Sl-5, SL-17 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. extension expected to reduce volumes. Proposed sites serving westbound in the morning and eastbound in the evening. N. 1st Street (New Market Rd to SR 29) SL-3, SL-22 Proposed sites serving each direction. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 3-4 3.2.2 Regional Interconnectivity Sites were proposed to support regional interconnectivity within the state of Florida and intercity transit. FDOT identifies the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) highway corridors in Collier County as I-75, SR 29, and SR 82 (FDOT 2019). These highways provide regional interconnectivity between cities and counties within Florida. Additionally, there are state grant sources for projects that support regional travel along SIS corridors. Park-and-ride sites were located as close as possible to interchanges and intersections along these highways. The TDP proposed a new CAT route to accommodate commuters traveling to Lehigh Acres. Sites were proposed in Immokalee to serve the commute into Lee County from Lehigh Acres. Additionally, Lee County is developing a new park-and-ride lot to serve the commute from Lehigh Acres to employment areas. Table 3-3 lists proposed locations for regional interconnectivity. Table 3-3. Proposed Park-and-Ride Locations for Regional Interconnectivity Proposed Location/Description Park-and-Ride Site ID Comments Railhead SL-1 Located on County property adjacent to the railroad tracks along Old US 41. Can also serve the Southwest Florida International Airport. Immokalee Health Department SL-3 Location is adjacent to SR 29. Target (Immokalee Rd.) SL-16 Located adjacent to I-75 interchange to support regional commuters from Lee County. PL-1 is the alternative to this location. Creekside Transfer Station SL-15 Currently the only transfer station connecting to LeeTran. Provides interconnectivity to Lee County. Supports the airport and Gulf Coast Mall. Physicians Regional Hospital (Pine Ridge Rd.) SL-18 Adjacent to I-75 interchange. Can provide carpool opportunities for commuters working outside the County. Lehigh Acres SL-3 Servicing commuters heading into Lee County using the TDP’s proposed Lehigh Acres route. Connection to LeeTran should be explored with Lee County. Carnestown SL-23 Adjacent to SR 29 to service the City of Everglades with its proposed vanpool service. Golf Course/VA Hospital Lot SL-8 Adjacent to I-75 interchange for commuters heading eastbound. Sports Complex SL-9 Adjacent to I-75 interchange for commuters heading eastbound. Resource Recovery Park SL-19 Adjacent to I-75 interchange for commuters heading eastbound. 3.2.3 Demographics U.S. Census data was extracted from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Center for Economic Studies using data collected from 2017. The U.S. Census data displayed correlations of employee commute patterns by home and work areas through zip codes and places, which included cities, Census-designated places 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 3-5 (CDPs), etc. The analysis of the employee commute patterns displayed most Census tracks where workers live had the highest density quadrants at: •Golden Gate Estates region and northeast section of Collier County •Between Immokalee Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road, east of Airport Pulling Road •Between Vanderbilt Beach Road and north of Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and I-75 The home-to-work distance directional analysis resulted in approximately 49 percent of workers traveling less than 10 miles, approximately 20 percent traveling between 10 to 24 miles, 7 percent traveling 25 to 50 miles, and 24 percent traveling greater than 50 miles. The longer commutes are likely for commuters living in Immokalee and Marco Island and commuters traveling to these outskirt locations for employment. The cities, CDPs, and places where workers live resulted in: 5.9 percent Golden Gate CDP, 4.1 percent City of Bonita Springs, 3.5 percent for Immokalee CDP, 3 percent at Lehigh Acres CDP, 2.7 percent City of Naples, 2.1 percent City of Marco Island, and 2 percent Cape Coral City, with the remaining locations less than 2 percent. Cities, CDPs, and places with the largest employers are as follows: City of Naples (13 percent), City of Marco Island (3.7 percent), City of Bonita Springs (2.8 percent), and Immokalee CDP (2.6 percent), with the remainder less than 2 percent. The highest jobs per square mile are along the west boundary and coastline of Collier County, west of I-75, in Marco Island and in Immokalee. The data shows that traffic flow patterns for employment head west in the mornings and east in the evenings, indicating the need to support commuters to Marco Island and Immokalee. Refer to Figure 3-2 for zip code boundaries displaying top home area (residential) versus work areas. Appendix D provides additional demographic maps used in this analysis. Because park-and-ride lots should be located within less than 50 percent of commuters’ travel time (Renaissance Planning Group 2013), potential sites were evaluated around the employee’s home, evaluating direction of travel based on employment centers and places with the largest employers. The Census data showed 89,002 people employed and living inside the County, 52,918 people employed in the County but living outside the County, and 51,782 people living in the County but employed outside the County, as indicated on Figure 3-3. Of the employed workers in the County, approximately 63 percent live in the County. There is a close balance of commuters entering and leaving the County for work, indicating the need for interconnected service to Figure 3-3. Collier County Employment and Residency Source: 2017 U.S. Census Data Figure 3-2. Top Zip Codes for Home vs. Work Area Source: 2017 U.S. Census Data 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 3-6 surrounding counties and regional interconnectivity. The Census data show that most commuters come from Lee County surrounding I-75 and the Hendry County border. 3.2.4 Land Use Employment centers and business districts analyzed included, but were not limited to, the Coastland Center Mall, hospitals, County government campus (main campus, Horseshoe Drive, and planned Resource Recovery Park), Arthrex, Mercado, Waterside Shops, and retirement communities, such as Vi at Bentley Village and Moorings Park. Planned unit developments were used to determine location of commercial and residential areas (Collier County 2020). Employee commute patterns in underserved areas were also evaluated for the City of Everglades, Ave Maria, City of Immokalee, and City of Marco Island. Table 3-4 lists proposed sites that consider employee commute patterns. Table 3-4. Proposed Park-and-Ride Locations Based on Employee Commute Patterns Commute Pattern or Area Park-and-Ride Site ID Comments Employment in the City of Marco Island PL-9, PL-10, SL-13, SL-3, SL-22 Many sites serve this area; however, these are targeted lots. Employment in the City of Cape Coral (Lee County) SL-15, SL-16, PL-1 Existing Seed-to-Table lot also serves this area. Employment in the City of Immokalee and ZIP 34142 SL-5, SL-17, PL-4, PL-11, PL-9, PL-10, SL-13 Existing lot at Golden Gate Estates Library also serves this commute. Employees commuting from Golden Gate CDP PL-6, SL-8 Existing lot at the Golden Gate Library also serves this area. Employees commuting from City of Bonita Springs and City of Cape Coral PL-1, SL-16 Existing Seed-to-Table lot also serves this area. Employees commuting from Immokalee CDP SL-3, SL-22 Employees commuting from Lehigh Acres CDP SL-3, SL-22 Lee County is in progress for developing a park-and-ride lot for Lehigh Acres within Lee County limits. Employees commuting from City of Naples Pl-8, PL-7, SL-12, SL-20, SL-6 Employees commuting from Marco Island Existing at Marco Island Library Advertisement and guide signs are recommended to increase awareness of this lot. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 3-7 Table 3-4. Proposed Park-and-Ride Locations Based on Employee Commute Patterns Commute Pattern or Area Park-and-Ride Site ID Comments Employment circulation: inflow and outflow to Collier County SL-15, SL-16, PL-1 To and from Lee County and City of Bonita Springs. SL-3, SL-22 To and from Lehigh Acres. SL-8, Sl-9, SL-19 To and from Broward and Dade County. SL-23 To and from Monroe County. Employees commuting from City of Everglades SL-23 In conjunction with proposed vanpool service. Employees commuting from Ave Maria PL-11 Serving Ave Maria residents. 3.3 Beach Facilities Collier County serves as a destination location with the Gulf of Mexico coastline and beaches as its major generator of tourism (Naples beaches attract visitors worldwide). County and city public beaches reach capacity with both residents and tourists during peak season from October through March, causing informal park-and-ride to occur for beach access and beach hotel parking. Acquiring additional public beach access is costly and the limited opportunities attract private businesses, making it challenging for the County to acquire ideal locations at a reasonable cost. Several hotels along the coastline have constructed parking garages to support their parking demands, with hotel expansions requiring additional parking capacity, such as the Ritz-Carlton of Naples constructing a second parking garage to accom- modate their expansion. Beach capacity statistics were reviewed for the County beaches from 2017 through 2019. Table 3-5 lists the number of days during the fiscal year (FY) that each beach reached parking capacity. Table 3-6 displays the quantity of vehicles required to turn around at beach parking lots resulting from lack of capacity. Turnarounds were only counted where park attendants or vehicle counters exist. The beach parking locations not listed do not have statistics on turnaround counts (Sullivan, pers. comm. 2020). Table 3-5. Beach Parking Demand (2017–2019) Source: Sullivan, pers. comm. 2020 Beach Days at Capacity FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 a Barefoot Beach Access 84 54 72a Barefoot Beach Preserve 39 24 30 Clam Pass Beach Park 36 10a 29 Conner Park 9a 1a 5 South Marco Beach 156 177 164 North Gulf Shore Beach 32 16 35 Tigertail Beach Park 13 8 12 Vanderbilt Beach Park 71 29 45 a Value has missing quarterly data. All Quarter 4 data for FY 19 was not included. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 3-8 Table 3-6. Beach Capacity Total Turnarounds (2017–2019) Source: Sullivan, pers. comm. 2020 Beach Turnarounds FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 a Barefoot Beach Preserve 9,433 11,109 6,805 Clam Pass Beach Park 5,740 3,447a 4,539 Tigertail Beach Park 5,778 4,816 4,075 Vanderbilt Beach Park 2,793 2,689 1,460 a Value has missing quarterly data. All Quarter 4 data for FY 19 was not included. Beach parking locations were considered for areas under the existing power transmission lines that parallel Livingston Road on the west. Because of limited land use options, a park-and-ride facility under the transmission lines is an innovative use of the property. However, during stakeholder meetings, while the Parks & Recreation Division recommended beach park-and-ride lots east of US 41 because of its congestion, the County Tourism Division requested to locate beach lots closer than Livingston Road. Vacant properties were examined around Goodlette-Frank Road to serve beaches along the arterials of Pine Ridge Road, Vanderbilt Beach Road, and Immokalee Road. Refer to Table 3-7 for proposed beach sites. Of the existing County beaches, Clam Pass and Barefoot Beach Preserve have capacity to support additional visitors but available areas can only be accessed by walking and do not have access by shuttle or boardwalk. There is an existing CAT beach express bus that circulates from the Creekside transfer station to Conner Park to Delnor-Wiggins Pass State Park. However, each proposed beach lot is recommended to have a designated beach shuttle during tourism season, if one does not exist. Table 3-7. Proposed Park-and-Ride Locations for Beach Access Proposed Location/Description Park-and-Ride Site ID Comments Beach lot (Goodlette-Frank Road) SL-24 Undeveloped 13-acre parcel along Goodlette- Frank Rd. Beach lot (Vanderbilt Beach Road) SL-25 Undeveloped 5-acre parcel between US 41 and Goodlette-Frank Rd. Beach lot (Pine Ridge Road) SL-26 Undeveloped 1.6-acre parcel adjacent to Goodlette-Frank Rd. with parcel to the north 3.4 Candidate Locations Based on Stakeholder Input Using public participation data (Appendix C), candidate sites were evaluated against locations already identified to determine any additional sites. Survey responses included requests for proposed sites already being considered such as: • shuttle to beach • Lee County to main government campus • close to I-75 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 3-9 • East Naples • parking to help travel to Marco Island for work • Golden Gate Estates express bus • within Orangetree area to reduce traffic from Golden Gate Estates Table 3-8 lists additional locations added based on stakeholder feedback. Park-and-ride lots on the outskirts of downtown Naples to serve places that approach parking capacity, such as 5th Avenue North and Cambier Park are recommended. Continued communication is needed between the County and City of Naples to identify and develop park-and-ride lots to serve the downtown Naples area. Table 3-8. Proposed Park-and-Ride Locations Based on Stakeholder Input Proposed Location/Description Park-and-Ride Site ID Comments Pine Ridge and Collier Boulevard (CR 951) SL-8 Requested along CR 951 to serve the Golden Gate Estates area. Location proposed to capture area after existing lot at Estates Library. Downtown Naples (5th Ave., Cambier Park, beaches) N/A Requested to serve crowded destination spots within the City of Naples. Big Corkscrew Regional Island Park SL-4 Removed because PL-4 (Agricultural Center and Fairgrounds) is closer and serves same targeted ridership. 3.5 Proposed Park-and-Ride Sites Based on the site identification described herein, the complete list of the evaluation sites developed is shown on Figure 3-4 and Figure 3-5. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 3-10 Figure 3-4. Final Proposed Site Locations 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 3-11 Figure 3-5. Close Up of Final Proposed Site Locations 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 4-1 4. Site Design 4.1 Facility Types The targeted ridership and area served will determine the type of park-and-ride facility. Table 4-1 lists the types of park-and-ride lots identified in this Study serving the County’s current conditions. A full list of park-and-ride facility types, with descriptions and standards for each, are identified in Table 3-1 of the FDOT State Park-and-Ride Guide. Table 4-1. Types of Park-and-Ride Facilities Source: State Park-and-Ride Guide (FDOT 2012) Facility Type Description Recommended Site Size Shared-use (hosted on existing lots) Signing existing parking spaces in a privately-owned lot. Typically located at shopping plazas to ideally reduce additional trips taken by the user. Lease agreements are required for this private- public partnership. Recommended 5 to 10 spaces based on demand. For developer agreements, a minimum of 5 spaces is recommended; however, quantity should be tailored to the size of the development it would serve based on full build-out. Remote 20+ miles from employment. Low population growth anticipated. Refer to the FDOT State Park-and-Ride Guide for site size estimation calculations. Urban Fringe Located along the boundaries of an urban area. Serves areas of high concentrations of employees (home residence). Refer to the FDOT State Park-and-Ride Guide for site size estimation calculations. Parking Deficiency Supports locations where parking deficiencies already exist. Informal park- and-ride and carpool may already occur. Refer to the FDOT State Park-and-Ride Guide for site size estimation calculations. 4.2 Lot Size Estimation The quantity of parking spaces recommended and total lot size (acres) was estimated for each Priority Site. The lot size estimation was based on the FDOT (2012) State Park-and-Ride Guide methodology, tailored to the information provided or accessible. Once the lot size (quantity of spaces) is estimated, future build-out was determined with a design year of 2045. Acreage required for the lot was then estimated, including sidewalk, bus bay waiting areas, and stormwater treatment. It is recommended to acquire properties with the full acreage required to develop the 2045 build-out. Refer to Appendix E for detailed calculations on site size. Typically, lots are constructed to operate at 75 percent capacity. However, consideration should be made based on construction costs and funding available to determine the size constructed. Designs can be tailored to accommodate size and shape of the property available for parking. For example, a combination of pervious and impervious spaces may be used to reduce the area needed for stormwater treatment. Cost estimates were prepared based on lot size (refer to Section 6). Such additional features as restrooms, car charging stations, or ride sharing accommodations were not included in the lot size estimation and cost estimates. If such additional features with the site are desired, it is recommended to prepare a conceptual site plan to estimate additional space and utilities required for the site size, as well as a revised cost estimate. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 4-2 For shared-use lots on private property, the number of spaces provided usually ranges between 5 to 30 (Franklin Regional Council of Governments 2008). Because most sites proposed on shared-use are for employees and carpools at locations that still have available capacity, a quantity of 5 spaces, no greater than 10, was proposed for shared-use lots to serve current conditions. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 5-1 5. Site Evaluations 5.1 Evaluation Ranking Site visits were performed at each proposed shared-use lot to identify additional features that could benefit or hinder the success of the lot. Such features include lighting, security cameras, and the capacity of the existing lot (that is, does the lot already reach capacity or is it underutilized). Sites that ranked the highest reduce single occupancy trips and increase transit ridership. Sites with proposed alternative transportation modes, as opposed to transit, to serve the site (such as an express bus, vanpool, Mobility on Demand [MOD], etc.) are indicated under the comments section within each evaluation. Table 5-1 summarizes the final scores and prioritized rank. Refer to Appendix D for site photos and evaluation reports on each location. The TDP update was not finalized prior to the completion of this Study. The draft TDP report was used to evaluate planned transit routes along each site, with planned routes noted in the comments section of each form indicated as ‘TDP Proposed Routes’ (Medina 2020). Because the evaluations were based on the existing network, the scoring was not affected if the TDP-proposed routes no longer accommodated a site. However, if a vanpool service or MOD was proposed for the area, it was scored as an additional site benefit. If the TDP plans to eliminate transit along a proposed site and a direct shuttle, vanpool, or MOD service is not pursued by CAT to accommodate, the proposed site should not be pursued. Of the 32 sites evaluated, the top 14 ranked sites are recommended as priority sites. A total of 4 sites are proposed on existing lots, while 3 are not on County property and will require lease agreements. The average score of evaluated sites was 81.5 percent with a standard deviation of 7.8. 5.2 Priority Sites Figure 5-1 shows a map of the recommended priority site locations (including alternate locations) according to rank and recommended alternate. If a priority site cannot be pursued at the proposed location, the next highest-ranked site will be pursued. A site may be eliminated if agreement with property owners cannot be reached for property acquisition or lease. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 5-2 Table 5-1. Final Evaluation Rankings Rank Site ID Final Score Site Name Lease Agreement Required? County Owned? Parking Spacesa Lot Size (acres) Alternate Locations Targeted Ridership/ Destination Served Notesb 1 SL-15 102.8 Creekside 78 1.28 SL-1 Commuting between Collier and Lee County Phase I: Plaza not interested, proceed to Phase II. Options for lot location provided. 2 SL-20 101.0 Government Campus  5-10 Commuters to work. Commuters to CBD Recommended adjacent to museum parking (closest to transfer station). 3 PL-7 98.6 Coastland Center Mall  5-10 SL-2 Commuters to work, Commuters to shopping/ entertainment Options provided to serve this location. 4 PL-9 93.8 Freedom Square shopping center  5 PL-10, SL-13 Commuters to Marco Island or Everglades City Recommended over two alternate locations. 5 SL-18 91.3 Physicians Regional (Pine Ridge)  5 Commuters to work, Carpool 6 SL-22 89.3 Immokalee Government Center  43 0.91 SL-3 All trips for Immokalee residents; Remote facility SL-3 is recommended over SL-22 because of funding obtained. 7 SL-13 87.9 Marco Island (Crossing 951 & 41)  5 PL-9, Pl-10 Commuters to Marco Island or Everglades City Reevaluate need if higher-ranked alternate, PL-9, is developed. 8 SL-8 87.6 Golf Course / VA hospital  10 SL-10 Commuters to work, Regional interconnectivity County to determine development plans and adding spaces for park-and-ride/ 9 PL-10 87.5 Naples Outlet Mall  5 Pl-9, SL-13 Commuters to Marco Island or Everglades City Reevaluate need if higher-ranked alternates, SL 13 and PL-9, are developed. 10 SL-3 86.9 Immokalee Health Dept  43 0.91 SL-22 All trips for Immokalee residents leaving Immokalee Recommended over SL-22 because location has Tiger Grant funding for CAT transfer station. 11 SL-26 85.6 Beach Lot (Pine Ridge Rd)  420 4.81 Beach parking deficiency County to determine plans for the lot. 12 SL-25 85.6 Beach Lot (Vanderbilt Beach Rd)  373 4.21 Beach parking deficiency County to determine plans for the lot. 13 SL-1 85.4 Railhead (Old US 41)  94 1.46 SL-15 Airport, Commuters to work, Commuters between Collier and Lee County If SL-15 is constructed, a smaller site size is recommended. Size should be reevaluated based on site size of SL-15. 14 SL-10 83.1 Radio Rd Transfer Station lot 67 0.88 SL-8 Parking deficiency for transfer station and employment center Serves the Radio Rd. transfer station lot, which receives informal park-and-ride and is reaching parking capacity. 15 SL-6 82.9 The Marketplace at Pelican Bay  5 SL-25 Commuters to work Not recommended if SL-25 is built. 16 SL-11 82.8 Shoppes at Hammock Cove (Thomasson Dr)  5 SL-20 Commuters to work, Commuters to shopping/ entertainment 17 SL-5 81.5 Publix Plaza (Randall Blvd)  5 Commuters to work, primarily westbound 18 PL-1 80.4 Walmart (Immokalee Rd)  5 - 10 SL-16 Commuting between Collier and Lee County Options provided. 19 PL-2 78.5 Government Services Center at Heritage Bay  5 Commuters to work, primarily westbound or southbound 20 SL-24 77.2 Beach lot (Goodlette-Frank Rd) 420 4.81 Beach parking deficiency 21 SL-17 76.8 Rural Village (Immokalee Rd)  Needs Sizing PL-4 Commuters to work, primarily westbound 22 SL-7 75.7 Dicks Sporting Goods (Naples Blvd)  5 Commuters to work, Commuters to shopping/ entertainment 23 SL-2 75.1 Naples Plaza shopping center  5 PL-7 Commuters to work, Commuters to shopping/ entertainment 24 SL-21 75.1 Physicians Regional - Collier  5 Commuters to work, Carpool, primarily north and southbound 25 SL-16 75 Target (Immokalee Rd)  5 PL-1 Commuting between Collier and Lee County Lease for Phase 1 26 PL-4 73.3 Agricultural Center and Fairgrounds  Needs Sizing SL-17 Commuters to work, primarily westbound; Remote facility Phased as demand increases. 27 SL-23 73.3 Carnestown  Needs Sizing Commuters to work; remote facility 28 SL-9 73.1 Sports Complex  5 Commuters to work, Carpool 29 SL-14 71.7 Golden Gate Estates (1st St)  Needs Sizing Commuters to work, Carpool; Remote facility 30 PL-11 68.8 Ave Maria  5 Commuters to work, Carpool; Remote facility Options provided. 31 SL-12 66.1 Naples Airport  5 Commuters to work, Carpool Options provided. 32 SL-19 50.6 Resource Recovery Park  Needs Sizing Commuters to work a Quantity of parking spaces estimated to serve 2045 needs. Refer to Appendix E for site size calculations and FDOT State Park-and-Ride Guide for site sizing guidance. b Refer to Appendix D for the Site Evaluation on each location. Notes: Sites removed or relocated include PL-3, PL-5, PL-6, PL-12, SL-4 (Big Corkscrew Regional Park). Refer to Table 3-1 for details. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 5-3 Figure 5-1. Recommended Priority Sites (Including Alternative Locations) 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 5-4 5.3 Alternate Sites Some service areas had alternative sites (separate site IDs) evaluated or phased development listed within the comments section. The alternate with the highest rank should be pursued first and the other alternates pursued as applicable. Sites with higher-ranked alternates should have its site size reevaluated based on the size of the higher-ranked alternate that is developed. These locations in the Priority Sites include SL-22, SL-13, PL-10, and SL-1. Options are also presented on the evaluation forms for locations that may have more than one property pursued, if the recommended parcel is not successful. Alternative sites should be evaluated to pursue on a case-by-case basis, based on whether it is proposed on a shared-use or developed lot. 5.3.1 Alternates for Public-Private Partnerships For sites requiring public-private partnerships, sites were proposed on shared-use lots where the participating property owner would host a park-and-ride site on their lot. In this scenario, a lease agreement would be required, and the designated parking spaces would be signed as park-and-ride. Alternative sites on shared-use lots are considered interchangeable but can also be used in conjunction with each other where applicable. For example, PL-9, PL-10, and SL-13 are all proposed on a shared-use lots that requires a lease agreement and are alternates to each other. All three locations ranked as a priority site. However, all three sites may not need to be pursued. The highest-ranked site (PL-9) should be pursued first. If the property owner at the highest-ranked site is not amenable to providing the quantity of proposed parking spaces, the remaining spaces recommended should be pursued at the next highest- ranked alternate location. 5.3.2 Alternates for Developed Lots For developed lots with alternative sites, only one site shall be pursued with the other alternate site resized or eliminated. For example, SL-1 (Creekside) and SL-15 (Railhead) are alternates proposed for a transfer facility and connection with LeeTran. SL-15 resulted in a higher score because it already serves as a transfer station and accommodates several routes but requires the County to purchase property within an approximate 0.5-mile range. However, if property cannot be acquired within a reasonable price, the County should pursue its alternate, SL-1, which is on County-owned property. The transfer station with LeeTran and applicable CAT routes should be evaluated and rerouted to accommodate the new location as appropriate. If SL-15 is purchased and constructed, the site size for SL-1 should be significantly reduced. SL-22 (Immokalee Government Center) and SL-3 (Immokalee Health Department) are the two alternates proposed in the City of Immokalee and are both ranked within the top priority sites. Although the Immokalee Government Center scored slightly higher than the Immokalee Health Department, the Health Department already has funding in place from the Tiger Grant awarded in 2018 to construct a bus transfer station (Collier County 2020). Therefore, because of the proximity of the two lots, SL-3 should be the lot constructed and SL-22 removed from consideration. 5.3.3 Phased Development Some sites proposed various options for a location within the individual evaluation form. The evaluation was performed on the proposed phase, with an interim or long-term solution indicated as the applicable phase. Typically, approximately 5 spaces are proposed as an interim Phase I solution, with the fully developed lot as the long-term solution. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 5-5 Some locations had options presented to pursue. The prioritized option should be pursued first, then if an agreement or property acquisition cannot be made at agreeable terms, then the next option should be pursued for that location. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 6-1 6. Cost Estimates Cost estimates were developed for the priority site locations. Cost estimates included initial construction costs, estimated operating costs, and anticipated leasing fees. Initial construction costs included the cost of land acquisition, design, permitting, and the development of the site with recommended amenities. The estimate for SL-15 is $564,940, $352,251 for SL-3, $2,587,310 for SL-26, $2,318,200 for SL-25, and $565,013 for SL-10. Refer to Appendix E for a detailed breakdown of estimated costs and site size requirements. As noted in Section 4.2, additional features such as restrooms and utilities were not included in the cost estimates. Additional amenities desired, such as those proposed for SL-3, should be added to the cost estimates provided. The cost estimate for a new beach express shuttle to serve SL-26 is proposed to operate only during peak season. Because the beach only reached maximum capacity 36 days per year within the last 3 years (refer to Table 3-5), the cost estimate for a beach shuttle is anticipated to align with the cost of the R29a Beach Bus. A new beach express shuttle is also recommended to serve SL-25. The cost for new service to accom-modate the sites would be added to the cost estimates provided. The yearly maintenance cost per space for maintaining pavement, drainage, landscaping, and fencing is anticipated to cost at $130 per space per year for 2020. The yearly leasing fee for shared-use lots on private property is anticipated to be minimal, estimated at approximately $15 per space per year for 2020 (FDOT 2012). 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 7-1 7. Funding Sources An important consideration for prioritizing park-and-ride sites is determining available funding for developing and maintaining the site. Federal, state, and local funding options were reviewed in relation to each proposed park-and-ride site. Funding allocation will be needed for all elements of the development and maintenance including design, ROW acquisition or lease, construction, promotion, monitoring, operating, and management of the development and maintenance of the facilities. Funding will also be needed for any future expansion or improvements to the sites. The FDOT State Park-and-Ride Guide (FDOT 2012) summarizes potential federal and state funding sources for building park-and-ride facilities. The programs were evaluated for funding, implementing, and maintaining park-and-ride facilities as applicable to the proposed sites for the County. Refer to Section 8.2 for recommended funding sources to pursue for priority lots. 7.1 Federal Funding Federal resources are available and generally targeted to support the highway system and improve its capacity. Table 7-1 summarizes potential federal resources for programs administered by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). A recent award of the FY 17 Buses and Bus Facilities Infrastructure Investment Program through the FTA was to Lee County for the transfer station and park-and-ride lot (FTA 2020). Table 7-1. Federal Funding Sources Source: State Park-and-Ride Guide (FDOT 2012) Funding Source Agency Description Comments 5309 Bus and Bus Facilities (Transit Project Earmarks) FTA The Capital Investment Grants and Loans Program (formerly Discretionary Grants) provides transit capital assistance for new fixed guideway systems and extensions to existing fixed guideway systems (New Starts), fixed guideway modernization, and bus and bus-related facilities. Project must be consistent with the MPO plan, and typically matched on 80/20 basis. Small Starts FTA This program is following a simplified process for projects seeking less than $75 million in federal discretionary “Small Starts” funds and with a total project cost not exceeding $250 million. Has many requirements that are still in process. Exclusivity of corridor, model, and ridership may be issues. Very Small Starts FTA FTA has defined a class of projects that are very simple, low-cost, and demonstrably effective called Very Small Starts projects within the Small Starts Program. FTA’s intent is that Very Small Starts will qualify for an even simpler and expedited evaluation and rating process. Designed for the bus rapid transit services. Can be as high as 80/20 funding. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 7-2 Table 7-1. Federal Funding Sources Source: State Park-and-Ride Guide (FDOT 2012) Funding Source Agency Description Comments 5307 Formula Funds FTA The Urbanized Area Formula Grants Program provides transit capital and operating assistance to urbanized areas with populations of more than 50,000. Approximately $18 billion is provided to transit agencies for bus and rail vehicle replacements and facility recapitalization. Project must be consistent with MPO plan and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Typically used by transit agencies for non-project-specific funding. 5311 Capital Grant Program FTA This program provides grants for transportation projects that are included in a state program of mass transportation service projects (including service agreements with private providers of mass transportation service) for areas other than urbanized areas. Each state receives an apportioned amount based on its amount of non-urban area. This program is often used for operating assistance. Eligible activities include planning and marketing for intercity bus transportation; capital grants for intercity bus shelters; joint-use stops and depots; operating grants through purchase-of- service agreements, user-side subsidies, and demonstration projects. CMAQ Funds FTA A modification to the law during Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century provides states that receive the minimum apportionment of 0.5 percent with some flexibility to use CMAQ funds for Surface Transportation Program (STP)- eligible purposes. Project must be consistent with the local comprehensive plan and must be included in MPO plan and TIP. STP Funds FTA These funds are excess highway funds or those chosen to be flexed to transit projects. Federal and state funds that are flexed are permanently removed from a highway project or from potential highway project funding. Project must be consistent with the local comprehensive plan and must be included in MPO plan and TIP. 7.2 State Funding FDOT has a Park-and-Ride Grant Program that supports the purchase or leasing of private land for the construction of park-and-ride lots, as well as the promotion (advertisement) and monitoring of the lots. It is an integral part of the Commuter Assistance Program. The Central Office has established criteria for detailed park-and-ride planning, implementation, and evaluation. All local park-and-ride projects are reviewed for eligibility by the FDOT District office, and suitable projects are considered for funding. Table 7-2 summarizes potential state resources for programs administered by FDOT. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 7-3 Table 7-2. State Funding Sources Source: State Park-and-Ride Guide (FDOT 2012) Funding Source Agency Description Associated Issues Transit/Rail Service Development FDOT Discretionary funding allocated to specific projects by FDOT policy makers to assist in initiating new transit or rail service. Assistance can be either capital or operating grants, although operating assistance is limited to a defined timeframe (typically 3 years). Project must be consistent with the local comprehensive plan and must be included in MPO plan and TIP. Strategic Intermodal System FDOT An initiative by FDOT to provide funding for statewide and regionally significant transportation facilities and services. Initial focus is on improving intercity transportation corridors, rather than local services. Park-and-Ride; Commuter Assistance Programs FDOT Programs to facilitate the use of car pools/vanpools by providing funding for planning, marketing, and capital projects. Historically, focus has been on commuter assistance. Intermodal Development FDOT Program designed to provide funding for improved access, connections to other modes (for example, airports, seaports, and rail), and to facilitate intermodal or multimodal movement of people and goods. Project must be consistent with the local comprehensive plan and must be included in MPO plan and TIP. Public Transit Block Grants FDOT Formula grants to established transit providers for use on capital projects or operating assistance. Project must be consistent with the local comprehensive plan and must be included in MPO plan and TIP. State Infrastructure Bank Loans FDOT Provides low interest loans for transportation projects – all modes. Repayment terms are flexible and are negotiated on a case-by-case basis. This is a financing tool, not a grant. Project must be consistent with the local comprehensive plan and must be included in MPO plan and TIP. Not a grant—requires repayment. TRIPS FDOT Program to improve travel on regionally significant facilities or benefit regional travel or commerce; 50 percent of project cost or 50 percent of non- federal share. Project must be consistent with the local comprehensive plan and must be included in MPO plan and TIP. CIGP FDOT Up to 50 percent for improvements to relieve congestion on State Highway System. Project must be consistent with the local comprehensive plan and must be included in MPO plan and TIP. New Starts FDOT Dollar-for-dollar match of local funds for New Starts projects. Project must be consistent with the local comprehensive plan and must be included in MPO plan and TIP. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 7-4 7.3 Local Funding Local funding is typically required to match the federal and state resources. Local funds can include general Capital Funds or various taxes, such as sales tax, property tax, local business tax, taxes associated with transportation (such as vehicle registration fees), or tourist development tax. The County’s tourist development tax is governed by the Tourist Development Council (TDC) and TDC tax dollars are used for the promotion of tourism. Any projects and expenditures of tourist development tax must be approved by the TDC. This is a potential funding source to assist with park-and-ride lots associated with beach park facilities or those specifically designed to support tourism. Projects seeking TDC funding require TDC Board conceptual approval prior to advancement to ensure eligibility and support. Another possible local funding option includes working with the County MPO Congestion Management System to determine if their program has potential for funding certain park-and-ride facilities. Park-and- ride lots would be eligible under this program if they are located along corridors that do not meet an acceptable level of service and do not have funding for widening within the next 5 years. The Congestion Management Committee would review selected park-and-ride lots that meet this program’s goal to determine if it would be advanced for recommendation. If advanced, the Congestion Management Committee would prioritize the project and bring to the MPO Board for final approval. 7.4 Alternative Funding Strategies An alternative strategy for the development of additional park-and-ride lots in congested areas is to work with new commercial developments in their conceptual and design stage. When designing parking requirements for a commercial use, allowing developers to provide required parking spaces offsite can help promote park-and-ride facilities and reduce congestion. The developer could be given the option to either build a park-and-ride offsite or participate in a joint planned effort with funds from several developers being pooled for constructing lots or parking garages. Offsite parking for developers can be made more attractive by providing incentives and benefits, such as increased square footage capability for buildings, water treatment and storage, or even reduced development fees. The Seed-to-Table park-and-ride lot near the intersection of Livingston Road and Immokalee Road is a good example of such an arrangement (refer to Figure 7-1). Seed-to-Table is a retail market and café who funded and constructed a park-and-ride lot on County property. The design of the lot incorporates one section designated for Seed-to-Table use only and another section for public use. Because the lot is not ideal for pedestrian commute to the shopping center, the County required Seed-to-Table to provide a shuttle service to safely bring users (targeted for employees) across Livingston Road to the shopping center. Another alternative strategy is to use regulatory requirements to implement revisions to County and City systems (Naples, Marco Island, and Everglades City). For example, modifications to the Concurrency Management System Ordinances could be made by revising mitigating improvements to accept transit, instead of contributing to roadway improvements. This Figure 7-1. Seed to Table Park-and-Ride lot 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 7-5 would be advantageous where developments are increasing trips on corridors that have limited or no capability for ROW expansion (for example, Immokalee Road around I-75) or congested segments that cannot improve capacity or level of service because of financial limitations or environmental restrictions. It is recommended for the County and its associated municipalities to endorse this ordinance change. A standard process would need to be developed for computing transit fees as an alternative mitigating improvement. Specific areas or segments should be selected where this option is available to developers. The associated fees should be updated as needed in conjunction with the transit or mobility plan accepting this alternative (FDOT 2012). 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 8-1 8. Recommendations and Conclusions Park-and-ride priority lots should be adopted into the County’s LRTP and TDP updates. In addition, new sites should be acquired and reserved for the future along corridors identified in the AUIR or LRTP as deficient and along corridors with high commuter patterns, even if transit is currently not yet provided along that route. The County’s property acquisition team should inform CAT when any opportunities arise for potential purchase of land near these main arterials to serve this demand, as well as for beach parking within a 3-mile radius of beaches at capacity (refer to Table 3-5) especially in areas with limited availability, such as South Marco Beach Access in Marco Island. 8.1 Best Practices Designing and building cost-efficient park-and-ride facilities is key for the success of funding and feasibility. Facilities should be designed with landscaping that requires little to no maintenance to further reduce upkeep costs. In addition, Collier County Vertical Construction Standards should be incorporated where applicable for such items as video surveillance. Designing the sites with conventional facility standards that are used around the County, such as standard lighting fixtures and gates, will allow for efficient maintenance and servicing. Strategies and best practices should be incorporated into site design where feasible, as noted in Appendix A. Where appropriate based on parking and roadway capacity, park-and-ride spaces on shared- use lots can be designed for use only from Monday through Friday or weekends only. For the lots designed to accommodate offsite airport parking for the Southwest Florida International Airport. If charging is desired, parking meters and the PayByPhone system, or equivalent, could be implemented, with numbered parking spaces. The County shall determine the maximum amount of days to allow overnight parking. Expired spaces may be ticketed or towed at the owner’s expense. Using a parking meter that can be paid through an online (PayByPhone) portal would allow commuters who have unplanned extended trips to pay for the additional parking days remotely. The PayByPhone parking system with phone application is used by more than 300 cities designed to accommodate this service. An MOD service should be developed with Lee County to serve the airport commuters, such as those using SL-1. Lots allowing overnight parking should be fenced with automatic timed gates and night vision cameras to increase safety and security. 8.2 Property Acquisition and Lease Agreements To develop new lots, the following actions are recommended: • Establish funding, secure local funds, or obtain grants as applicable • Acquire property • Design and permit • Construct To establish funding for SL-15 (Creekside) and SL-10 (Radio Rd Transfer Station lot), grants may be pursued as the facility will also serve the transfer station. It is recommended to pursue the bus and bus facilities grant; however, funding can also be pursued using public transit block grants or possibly through the MPO’s Congestion Management Committee. For SL-3 (Immokalee Health Department), the funding for the transit center was included with Immokalee Complete Streets grant proposal, which was awarded the Tiger IX Grant in March 2018. The project 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 8-2 included a bus bay, canopy shelter, waiting area, trash receptacles, vending machines, restrooms, and Americans with Disabilities Act improvements. For the proposed beach lots, SL-26 (Pine Ridge Rd) and SL-25 (Vanderbilt Beach Rd), it is recommended to pursue TDC funds and the bus and bus facilities grant. An alternate funding source could be through public transit block grants. For shared-use lots requiring private-public partnerships, funding should be pursued using the FDOT Park- and-Ride commuter assistance programs. Property owners of the priority locations on shared-use lots were contacted. CAT and Collier MPO should more formally engage with property owners at proposed lease locations to describe the project and inform on the benefits a park-and-ride can bring to commercial lots. A sample maintenance agreement can be found in the FDOT State Park-and-Ride Guide. 8.3 Promotion of the Facilities As discussed in Appendix A, guide signs following the latest MUTCD guidelines are recommended on the major arterial leading to each park-and-ride lot (existing and future) provided within the County, as well as at the entrance of each lot. In addition, CAT should create a separate webpage identifying each lot and shared-use site available for park-and-ride within the County, with photos and descriptions of each lot. The webpage should include information on the benefits of using park-and-ride and links for commuter service and MOD available. In addition, park-and-ride locations should be added to the overall CAT map and to the interactive bus route maps’ Real Time Trip Planner webpage (CAT 2020). The facilities can also be promoted by installing amenities to entice users to the lot, such as electric vehicle car charging stations. To help commuters to reach their ultimate destination after taking transit, alternative methods such as electric scooter stations can be installed at popular stops. Each developed park-and-ride lot and transfer station should have informational signs about the lots available within the County and information on CAT and the commuter assistance program. To advertise designated beach park-and-ride lots, tourism and Parks & Recreation websites should promote the lots to increase awareness. Pamphlets of the beach shuttle should be available at hotels and tourist locations. The Parks & Recreation Division recommended the beach shuttle be exchanged with a beach trolley, with open windows and beach graphic wraps to attract tourists and entice users. Additional promotion and marketing strategies outlined in FDOT State Park-and-Ride Guide (FDOT 2012) should be pursued as resources and funding are available. For all beach park-and-ride lots, digital ‘real-time’ tracking signs indicating the quantity of available spaces is proposed along the arterials. Real-time tracking for SL-26 should be posted at the park-and-ride lot (Pine Ridge Road) for drive-by trips as well as on US 41 prior to visitors entering Seagate Drive. This will reduce trips on Seagate Drive and promote lot use. The real-time tracking should also be posted online to allow visitors to plan their route accordingly during peak season. The online location should be easy to search, with the location posted on the interactive sign. It would be ideal for the website to indicate ‘real-time’ availability of parking at each of the County beach lots. 8.4 Park-and-Ride Handbook A Park-and-Ride Handbook was developed to assist in the evaluation process for future sites analyzed after the conclusion of this Study (refer to Appendix B). The handbook should also be used as the basis for any future park-and-ride studies performed for the County. The handbook includes guidance on the site selection and evaluation process as well as the Evaluation Methodology and Evaluation Forms. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 8-3 Weighting and evaluation methodology should be reevaluated as demographics, needs, and development changes occur within the County from the current 2020 conditions of this Study. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 9-1 9. References BMI, Burgess & Niple, Inc., and Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc. 2003. Northern Virginia Park & Ride Lot Feasibility Study Final Report. Prepared for: Virginia Department of Transportation Northern Virginia District. April. http://www.virginiadot.org/projects/resources/NorthernVirginia/NoVA-pknride-study.pdf. Coastal Region MPO. “Park and Ride Lot Initiative." Accessed July 2020. https://www.thempc.org/Core/Pr#gsc.tab=0. Collier County. 2016. IMMOKALEE COMPLETE STREETS GROWING CONNECTIONS TO CREATE MOBILITY OPPORTUNITIES TIGER 2016 APPLICATION. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=65746 Collier County. 2019. ANNUAL UPDATE & INVENTORY REPORT/CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT SCHEDULE UPDATE ON PUBLIC FACILITIES 2019 AUIR/CIE. Prepared by Comprehensive Planning Section Zoning Division Growth Management Department. Collier County. 2019. Collier County Sports Complex & Events Center. December 10. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=90757 Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). 2020. Public Participation Plan. June 12. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 2020. "Park and Ride." Accessed July 2020. https://www.mass.gov/park-and-ride. Commuter Services of Pennsylvania. 2020. "Park & Ride Map." Accessed July 2020. https://pacommuterservices.org/park-ride-map/. Connetics Transportation Group, Moffatt & Nichol, and Symbioscity. 2014. Park-And-Ride Lot Study Final Report. Prepared for: Coastal Region MPO. September. https://www.thempc.org/eagenda/x/acat/2014/October%2020,%202014%20Regular%20Meeting%20 of%20the%20CORE%20MPO%20ACAT%20on%20Monday,%20October%2020,%202014/47438766- 0949-402D-8459-D1A489615413.pdf David Plummer and Associates, Inc. 2010. Miami-Dade Countywide Consolidated Park-and-Ride Facilities Plan. October. http://miamidadetpo.org/library/studies/consolidated-park-and-ride-facilities-plan-final- 2010-10.pdf Emerald Coast Regional Council. 2020. Park and Ride. Accessed August 17. https://www.ecrc.org/programs/transportation_planning/park_and_ride.php Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2009. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. 2009 Edition. U.S. Department of Transportation. December. Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2020. “Fiscal Year 2017 Bus and Bus Facilities Projects.” Accessed July 2020. https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/fiscal-year-2017-bus-and-bus-facilities-projects. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2009. Florida's Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan. FDEP Division of Recreation and Parks. November 16. https://floridadep.gov/sites/default/files/OutdoorRecreationinFlorida2008.pdf 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 9-2 Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2012. State Park-and-Ride Guide. Prepared for: Florida Department of Transportation Transit Office. June 1. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default- source/content/transit/pages/finalparkandrideguide20120601.pdf?sfvrsn=a592696c_0 Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2019. SIS Atlas. October 31. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/planning/systems/programs/ mspi/pdf/sis-atlas-103119d82d9d26abf840a38ffc216e03e26474.pdf Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2020. Commute Connector. Accessed August 17. https://commuteconnector.agilemile.com. Franklin Regional Council of Governments. 2008. Franklin County Park and Ride Study. Prepared for: Franklin County. September. https://frcog.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/%E2%80%A2- ParkandRideStudy_Final-Report-%E2%80%A2-.pdf Google. 2020a. “Park & Ride, San Carlos Drive, Fort Myers Beach.” Accessed July 2020. https://earth.google.com/web/. GradyMinor. 2018. Clam Pass Parking Garage. May 29. Jacobs. 2020. Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. December 2020 (expected). Karto, Zachary , Senior Planner, Collier Area Transit. 2020. Personal communication (email) with Felicia Kirby, Jacobs. July 13. Lee County Transit (LeeTran). 2019. LeeTran System Map. https://www.leegov.com/leetran/PublishingImages/Lee%20Tran%20System%20Map%202019%20web. pdf Manatee County Area Transit (MCAT). 2018. MCAT Transit Development Plan 2019 - 2028 Major Update Final Report. Prepared for: Manatee County. Prepared by: Manatee County Area Transit. August. https://www.mymanatee.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7588306/File/Departments/MCAT/Agency%20I nformation/Transit%20Development%20Plan/Manatee-Connect-TDP-Final-Report-1.pdf Manatee County Area Transit (MCAT). 2019. 2019-2020 Annual Progress Report for the MCAT Transit Development Plan 2019-2028 Major Update. August. https://www.mymanatee.org/published/ August%206,%202019%20-%20Regular%20Meeting%20on%20Tuesday,%20August% 2006,%202019/71D20B1E-CBE7-4E7A-8F1E-084047CBB58D.pdf Manatee County Area Transit (MCAT). 2020. “Bus Routes and Maps.” https://www.mymanatee.org/departments/mcat/bus_routes_and_maps. Accessed July 2020. Matthew C. Boyer & Associates. 2014. Humboldt County Association of Governments Park and Ride Study: Technical Memorandum: #1B (Commute Patterns). Prepared for: Humboldt County. April. http://www.hcaog.net/sites/default/files/tm_1b_draft_final_042814.pdf Matthew C. Boyer & Associates. 2017. Draft Park-and-Ride Master Plan. Prepared for El Dorado County Transit Authority. January 24. http://3nmak51dheck3t8vkw20jvcz-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp- content/uploads/2017/01/Report-Draft-El-Dorado-Transit-Park-and-Ride-Master-Plan-2017-02-02.pdf 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 9-3 Medina, Josephine, Senior Planner, Collier MPO. 2020. Personal communication (email) with Felicia Kirby, Jacobs. April 1, 2020. Miami-Dade County. 2020. "Metrobus Park and Ride Lots." Accessed July 2020. https://www.miamidade.gov/global/transportation/metrobus-park-ride.page. Miami-Dade County. 2018. Dolphin Station Truck Parking and Park & Ride Site Feasibility Study. Prepared for: Miami-Dade County. Accessed June 2020. https://www.mdxway.com/pdf/2- Dolphin%20Park%20and%20Ride%20Transportation%20Aesthetics%20Review%20Committee%20pres entation.pdf Olson, Nancy, Regional Manager, Parks & Recreation. 2018. Personal communication (email) with Felicia Kirby, Jacobs. May 23. Renaissance Planning Group. 2013. Regional Park-And-Ride Strategic Implementation Plan for the Sarasota/Manatee Metropolitan Planning Organization. Prepared for: Sarasota MPO. December. Ride Solutions. Park-And-Ride Study: Inventory, Use, and Need for the Roanoke and New River Valley Regions. Prepared for: Virginia Department of Transportation. Prepared by: Ride Solutions. http://nrvrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Park-And-Ride-Study-2009.pdf Spillar, Robert J. 1997. Park-and-Ride Planning and Design Guidelines. Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. October. http://cdn.wspgroup.com/8kzmue/park-and-ride-planning-and-design- guidelines.pdf Sullivan, Jake, Acting Manager Region I, Collier County. 2020. Personal communication (email) with Felicia Kirby, Jacobs. March 3, 2020. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. 2011. Transit Development Plan FY 2012 - 2021 Final Report. Prepared for: Lee County Transit. September. https://www.leegov.com/leetran/Documents/LeeTran_2012_TDP.pdf Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. 2012. Conceptual Vision for Park-and-Ride Facilities Final Report. Prepared for: Pasco County MPO. December. https://www.pascocountyfl.net/DocumentCenter/View/ 11055/Pasco-Park-and-Ride-Vision---Final?bidId= Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. 2012. Transit Infrastructure Guidelines Manual. Prepared for: Pasco County Metropolitan Planning Organization. December. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. 2018. MCAT Transit Development Plan 2019 - 2028 Major Update Final Report. Prepared for Manatee County Area Transit. August. https://www.mymanatee.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7588306/File/Departments/MCAT/Agency%20I nformation/Transit%20Development%20Plan/Manatee-Connect-TDP-Final-Report-1.pdf University of South Florida (USF). 2005. COLLIER COUNTY Park & Ride Site Identification Study. Prepared for: Collier County. Prepared by: Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR). November. University of South Florida (USF). 2011. TBEST Model Enhancements Parcel Level Demographic Data Capabilities and Exploration of Enhanced Trip Attraction Capabilities. Prepared for: State of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Prepared by: Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR). September. https://www.nctr.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/77801.pdf 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study PPS0715201202SWF 9-4 Valley Metro. 2018. North Glendale Park-And-Ride Study Final Report. May. https://www.valleymetro.org/ sites/default/files/uploads/event-resources/n_glendale_pnr_study_final_rpt_0518.pdf Valley Metro. 2020. "Park-and-Rides." https://www.valleymetro.org/park-and-ride. Accessed July 2020. Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. (VHB). 2019. Transit Development Plan Major Update (2020–2029). Prepared for Sarasota County Area Transit. August. https://www.scgov.net/home/ showdocument?id=42942 Collier County. 2020. Collier County GIS Hub. Accessed April 15. https://hub- collierbcc.opendata.arcgis.com/search?q=pud%20Collier%20County. U.S. Census Bureau. 2020. OnTheMap. Accessed April 29, 2020. https://onthemap.ces.census.gov. Caltrans. 2020. "Park and Ride Program." Accessed July 2020. https://dot.ca.gov/caltrans-near- me/district-11/programs/district-11-planning-local-assistance/district-11-park-ride-program. Citrus Connection. 2020. “Routes/Services.” Accessed July 2020. https://ridecitrus.com/routes/. City of New York. 2020. "FAQ: Park-n-Ride." Accessed July 2020. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/opa/commuters/faq-park-n-ride.page. Google. 2020b. “Gow B. Fields Park and Ride.” Accessed July 2020. https://earth.google.com/web/. Lee County. 2020. "Lee Tran Beach Park and Ride." Accessed July 2020. https://www.leegov.com/facilities/project?pID=25/. Broward County Transit. 2020. System Map. Accessed August 17. https://www.broward.org/BCT/Documents/SystemMap.pdf. Palm Tran. 2020. Accessed August 17. https://www.palmtran.org/. PayByPhone. 2020. Accessed September 2020. https://www.paybyphone.com/. Collier County. 2020. TIGER GRANT IX. Accessed September 14, 2020. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-a-e/capital-project-planning-impact-fees- and-program-management/transportation-planning-section/grants/tiger. Collier Area Transit. 2020. MyStop. Accessed September 16. http://collierivl.availtec.com/infopoint/. 9.F.1 Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: CAT Park and Ride Study (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) Appendix B Park-and-Ride Handbook 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park-and-Ride Handbook PPS0715201202SWF 1 CAT Park and Ride Handbook October 2020 Collier MPO and CAT 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park-and-Ride Handbook PPS0715201202SWF 2 Table of Contents 1.Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.Evaluation Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 5 3.Evaluation Form ................................................................................................................................................11 4.References ......................................................................................................................................................... 18 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park-and-Ride Handbook PPS0715201202SWF 3 1. Introduction This Park-and-Ride Handbook is established for Collier County to follow a standard procedure for identifying and evaluating future park-and-ride sites. This handbook should be used as a basis for repeating any park-and-ride studies in the future. Contents of the handbook include: 1. Evaluation Methodology for direction on completing the evaluation forms. 2. Evaluation Form to assess each site. The analysis procedure outlined in Figure 1-1 should be followed for identifying, evaluating, and recommending future sites. The latest best practices should be incorporated into the analysis and design process as well as those outlined in the Research Memorandum (refer to Appendix A of the Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study). It is preferable to visit the proposed site, especially if it would be a shared- use lot, to determine any additional site benefits or constraints. The methodology should be updated to evaluate planned routes if CAT has accepted planned or revised routes to their existing system. The weighting, evaluation methodology scoring, and questions should be reevaluated as demographics, needs and development occurs within Collier County from the conditions at the time of this study. Funding sources should be reevaluated as available options change. 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park-and-Ride Handbook PPS0715201202SWF 4 Figure 1-1. Park-and-ride evaluating procedure 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride CAT Park-and-Ride Handbook PPS0715201202SWF 5 2. Evaluation Methodology This methodology provides instruction for evaluating potential park-and-ride sites on the evaluation form. These criteria will provide quantitative ratings to determine the site’s anticipated level of success. The evaluation criteria summarized herein scores the proposed site based on many factors including location and economic feasibility. These criteria were based on the Florida Department of Transportation State Park and Ride Guide site selection evaluation methodology and tailored to the local conditions within Collier County (hereafter, “the County”). Weighted values were assigned to tailor the assessment to the County’s specific needs. The weightings were assigned by a project team consisting of representatives from Collier Area Transit, Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization, and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. The weightings reflect the criteria’s anticipated contribution to the success of the site, with designations as follows: 1. Basic site requirement 2. Desirable benefit 3. Significant benefit The assigned weighting (W) is indicated after each question. The proposed number of spaces shall be indicated on each form. For shared-use lots, between 5 and 10 spaces were proposed. For new developed lots, the quantity of proposed spaces was calculated as detailed in the Collier MPO and CAT Park-and-Ride Study. The evaluation criteria are as follows: 1) Is the site on a major arterial? (W=3) Sites are more desirable if located along a major arterial. The farther the distance is from the site, the less convenient the site is to travelers. Therefore, as the distance from a major arterial increases, the less desirable the location is. Scoring Criteria: Along major: 10 pts; Within 0.25 mi: 8 pts; Within 0.5 mi: 6 points; Within 0.75 mi: 4 pts. 2) Is the site located on an existing transit line? If so, indicate which route. (W=2) Sites along an existing transit line are more desirable. The further the site is from an existing transit line, the further an existing route will have to go to accommodate the new location. A new route may also be needed if an existing transit line cannot reasonably accommodate the new location. Route number is requested for informational purposes only. All routes that are located along the site shall be listed. This question should be evaluated based on the latest route layouts. Note: Planned routes proposed within the draft TDP were noted in the comments section for each evaluation. Scoring Criteria: On existing: 10 pts; Within 0.25 miles: 8 pts; Within 0.5 miles: 6 pts. 3) Is there an existing bus stop adjacent to the site? If so, indicate the bus stop ID. Is it a well-used stop? (W=1) If the site already has a bus stop, the transit service does not need to provide a new stop at the proposed site. A new stop would require coordination with adjacent property owners, an easement 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park-and-Ride Handbook PPS0715201202SWF 6 or right-of-way (ROW) acquisition, and passenger amenities. Ridership is requested for information only using count data provided by CAT. Scoring Criteria: Yes: 10 pts, Within 250 ft: 8 pts; Within 500 ft: 6 pts; Within 750 ft: 4 pts; Within 1,000 ft: 2 pts. 4) Does the existing bus stop have passenger amenities (shelter & bench)? If no, is there ROW available for amenities at the site? (W=1) A site with a shelter and bench is more attractive to commuters. If the site needs a shelter and bench, construction costs to the site will increase. Scoring Criteria: Shelter & bench: 10 pts; Bench only: 7 pts; ROW available: 6 pts. 5) Is the site located upstream of a congested segment based on anticipated travel path in the AM and/or PM? Note what applies and anticipate future growth. (W=2) The site is more desirable if it is located directly upstream of a congested area. This will reduce the quantity of traffic travelling through the congested area. AM and PM traffic flow will be used to determine whether the Site is ‘upstream’ of anticipated travel path. Refer to the latest AUIR for existing and anticipated deficient roads. Scoring Criteria: Within 0.5 mi: 10 pts; Within 1 mi: 8 pts; Within 2 mi: 4 pts. 6) Does the site have good visibility (from arterial)? (W=1.5) Visibility is more desirable as it is associated with safety and security. Additional factors such as lighting can help increase visibility and provide a feeling of safety. Remote locations with less visibility are less desirable. In addition, a site that is visible from the side of a major arterial increases’ awareness of the park-and-ride. • Clearly Visible: entirely visible from main arterial • Partially Visible: lot is visible from main arterial, but sight line may be slightly obstructed by vegetation, walls, etc. • Semi-Visible: visible from access road Scoring Criteria: Clearly visible: 10 pts; Partially visible: 8 pts.; Semi-visible: 5 pts. 7) How far is the site from the Central Business District (CBD) or Activity Center? (W=1.5) Sites were evaluated based on their distances from CBD or Activity Center. If a site is too close, commuters will walk instead of using transit. Conversely, if too far, it reduces attractiveness of the site. A site within a range of slightly more than 1 mile will be the most attractive to prompt users to use the lot and transit system. Use Google Maps for mileage approximations. CBD’s and activity centers included, but was not limited to, the City of Naples, Coastland Center Mall, hospitals, government campus, Mercato, Waterside Shops, high employment areas such as Marco Island, hotels, Arthrex, Vanderbilt Beach Hotels, retirement communities (Moorings Park, Via Bentley), etc. Scoring Criteria: 1-3 miles: 10 pts; Within 5 miles: 8 pts; Within 10 miles: 5 pts; <1 or >10 miles: 0 pts. 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park-and-Ride Handbook PPS0715201202SWF 7 8) Does the site have sufficient access (ingress and egress) from the adjacent roadway? (W=3) A site with easy/quick access is more desirable for users. A site may include recommended access improvements when constructed. Desirable ingress and egress include right in, right out, left in, left out and distance to signals. • Excellent: Signal access or left in, left out, right in, right out or access off two roads (10 pts) • Good: Directional access with U-turns available within 0.2 miles • Fair: Directional access with U-turns available within 0.5 mile • Poor: One direction in, U-turns not available within 1 mile Scoring Criteria: Excellent: 10 pts; Good: 8 pts; Fair: 6 pts; Poor: 0 pts. 9) Is the location on the correct side of the road for transit pickup (serving proper direction for anticipated demand)? (W=2) A site will be more convenient and reduce travel time when on the correct side of the road (direction of travel) for the commute to the destination. Scoring Criteria: Yes: 10 pts; No: 0 pts. 10) Is the site in proximity to an existing park-and-ride facility serving the same route? (W=1.5) If the site is located too close to an existing Park and Ride site serving the same route, the new location may not attract enough new users or attract users from the existing site. Therefore, the site is expected to have less cost benefit. Sites that have further spacing will likely generate more overall use resulting in a greater cost benefit. The Radio Road transfer station and Seed-to-Table lots were evaluated as park-and-ride facilities in addition to those marked on the System Map accessed from the CAT website which identifies park-and-ride lots at the Headquarters Library, Estates Library, Golden Gate Library, and Marco Island library. *Note: If an existing park-and-ride facility is over capacity and cannot be expanded, the scoring should not penalize the site. Park-and-ride facilities at capacity should be noted but excluded in the evaluation of this question. Scoring Criteria: >10 mi: 10 pts; 5-10 mi: 7 pts; <5 miles but different direction: 2 pts; <5 mi and same direction: -40 pts. 11) Is the anticipated commuter driving distance minimal (from home to the site) for the majority of targeted ridership? Identify targeted ridership. (W=1) A site is more desirable when the commuter has less distance to travel to reach the site. If the site is too far, commuters are less likely to use the site. The commuter driving distance is estimated based on factors such as survey results, anticipated targeted ridership, adjacent developments, etc. Targeted ridership shall be identified for information only. Use the US Census maps, census- designated places (CDP’s), and Google Earth for measurements. Scoring Criteria: 1-3 mi: 10 pts; 4-6 mi: 8 pts; 7-10 mi: 6 pts; >10 mi: 0 pts. 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park-and-Ride Handbook PPS0715201202SWF 8 12) Is the site within or adjacent to a commercial area? (W=2) A site is more attractive if commuters can utilize adjacent commercial areas. If commercial areas are within close range, commuters can easily incorporate other trips into the original trip and may result in reduced vehicle miles traveled. This will help identify public/private partnerships and Sites with multi-use amenities. Scoring Criteria: Yes: 10 pts; Within 250 ft: 8 pts; Within 500 ft: 6 pts; Within 750 ft: 4 pts; Within 1,000 ft: 2 pts. 13) Are there pedestrian and/or bicycle facilities adjacent to the site that connect to the transit stop? Is adding infrastructure feasible? (W=2.5) Bicycle and pedestrian facilities make a location more attractive. If a site is located within close range of an existing bicycle or pedestrian facility, it can be used to reach the transit stop at minimal cost. Feasibility of adding facilities is for information only. If a transit stop does not currently exist, respond indicating if bicycle and pedestrian facilities exist for proposed new location. Scoring Criteria: At site: 10 pts; Within 250 ft: 8 pts; Within 500 ft: 6 pts; Within 750 ft: 4 pts; Within 1,000 ft: 2 pts. 14) Does the site have existing parking facilities that can be used? (W=3) If a site already has parking spaces that can be utilized, there are significant cost savings to developing the site. If the proposed site is on private property assume 5 spaces. If the lot is on private property and there are usually many spaces available assume 5-10 spaces. Assume >10 if developing a new parcel. Scoring Criteria: >10 spaces: 10 pts; 5-10 spaces: 7 pts; <5 spaces: 2 pts. 15) If the answer to Question 14 was no, is there available ROW at the site for a minimum of 5 spaces? 10 spaces? More than 10 spaces? Is it owned by the County? (W=2) If the site has available ROW that can be purchased to allow at least 5 spaces, the site is worth pursuing. If ROW available would provide less than 5 spaces, it is less desirable to invest in that location. If the property is already owned by the County, savings will include purchase of the property and quicker schedule to develop the site. Scoring Criteria: ROW available & County owned: 10 pts; ROW available & Privately owned: 5 pts. 16) If the answer to Question 14 was no, what is the location zoned as? (W=1) If a location needs to be rezoned to allow for a Park and Ride site, there could be opposition from the public. In addition, it would take additional time and budget to rezone the property for a Park and Ride location. Collier County interactive GIS zoning maps can be accessed from: https://colliercountygmd.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=d3f4802ac5b743 39b21b27467ff4c9fb Scoring Criteria: Commercial or Industrial: 10 pts; Residential: 0 pts. 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park-and-Ride Handbook PPS0715201202SWF 9 17) Does the Site have capability for expansion? (W=1) If the site is successful, having the ability to expand and accommodate future growth is more desirable. As traffic projections show an increase in congestion along major arterials, Park and Ride usage is expected to increase. • Excellent: Empty space for development or has undeveloped area within the parcel • Good: Undeveloped parcels within range of the lot. • Fair: On private lot, capability for expansion with shopping center area can approach different property owner along same route • Poor: Privately owned and not many available spaces usually observed Scoring Criteria: Excellent: 10 pts; Good: 8 pts; Fair: 3 pts; Poor: 0 pts. 18) How much time is anticipated to acquire and develop the Site as a Park and Ride? (W=1.5) The quicker a site can be developed, the more desirable it is. If a site is anticipated to have a long acquisition, zoning, and construction period, the site is deemed less desirable. • Within 6 months: for developed properties on County property (ex. Library) • Within 9 months: for privately owned locations proposed for a lease agreement, anticipated more than 6 months but less than 9 months. Timeline based on the following schedule:  1-2 months get in contact with property owner and setup meeting with proper contacts  1-2 month discuss and negotiate location of spaces, costs, etc.  1-2 month get lease agreement contract established and finalized, signatures and draft BCC agenda item  1 month BCC item internal approvals and BCC approval  1 month obtain P&R signs and install • Over 9 months: for undeveloped parcels requiring design, permitting, construction, and some cases property acquisition. Scoring Criteria: Within 6 months: 10 pts; Within 9 months: 8 pts; Over 9 months: 4 pts. 19) Would the Site encourage employee ride sharing? (W=1) Sites that are anticipated to encourage employee ride sharing are more desirable. Additional benefits include reduced trips on the road and reduced carbon emissions. Use US Census maps and deficient roadways listed in the latest AUIR. • Likely: within 3 miles of high-density areas or remote areas • May encourage: within 3 miles Medium- density areas • Not likely: travelers commuting short distances and spaces usually available at destination Scoring Criteria: Likely: 10 pts; May encourage: 5 pts; Not likely: 0 pts. 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park-and-Ride Handbook PPS0715201202SWF 10 20) Include any additional Site benefits and/or negative features associated with this location. (W=2.5) Identify if there are any additional unique benefits to the site to increase usage. Unique benefits can increase the site’s usage over other locations. For example, numerous adjacent planned land use developments are underway near an intersection, the proposed site is located upstream to reduce trips through the congested area. Negative features unique to the site which make it less desirable for users will receive negative points. Scoring Criteria: Benefit or negative feature (± pts) as follows: • Lighting: +2 pts • Cameras: +2 pts • Increased security (near sheriff office, EMS, mall patrol, etc): +5 pts • Lack of available parking spaces if on private lot or lot seen to be full: -3 pts • ADA compliant Bus Stop: +3 • Transfer facility (+10) or for every additional route location serves (+2 not to exceed 10) • Connection to other service route (ex. LeeTran, established vanpool) (+12) • Public restroom facilities available (+5) • Established express route serves location (+2). Note: if a location was currently not served by transit but is proposed within the TDP to be served by mobility on demand (MOD), vanpool, or express points were provided in this section. • Assisting underserved and isolated communities, including Everglades City, Marco Island, Immokalee, and Ave Maria (+8) • Serving regional commuters (+10) • Other: serving areas that reach parking capacity and informal P&R naturally occurs (+10). Comments Any sites with alternates, phasing, or options proposed were indicated in the comments section. The draft TDP proposed routes were indicated in each evaluation under the comments section as “TDP Proposed Routes.” 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park-and-Ride Handbook PPS0715201202SWF 11 3. Evaluation Form 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park and Ride Site Evaluation Form Proposed Location Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Evaluation Criteria 3 (Along major: 10 pts; Within 0.25 mi: 8 pts; Within 0.5 mi: 6 points; Within 0.75 mi: 4 pts) 2 (On existing: 10 pts; Within 0.25 miles: 8 pts; Within 0.5 miles: 6 pts) 1 (Yes: 10 pts, Within 250 ft: 8 pts; Within 500 ft: 6 pts; Within 750 ft: 4 pts; Within 1,000 ft: 2 pts) 1 (Shelter & bench: 10 pts; Bench only: 7 pts; ROW available: 6 pts) 2 (Within 0.5 mi: 10 pts; Within 1 mi: 8 pts; Within 2 mi: 4 pts) 1.5 (Clearly visible: 10 pts; Partially visible: 8 pts; Semi-visible: 5 pts) 1.5 (1-3 miles: 10 pts; Within 5 miles: 8 pts; Within 10 miles: 5 pts; <1 or >10 miles: 0 pts) 6. Does the site have good visibility (from arterial)? 7. How far is the Site from the CBD or Activity Center? and/or PM? Note what applies and anticipate future growth. Score Weight Total 3. Is there an existing bus stop adjacent to the Site? If so, indicate the bus stop ID. 5. Is the Site located upstream of a congested segment based on anticipated travel path in the AM Is it a well-used stop? available for amenities at the Site? No. of Proposed Spaces:Location ID:Overall Score (%): 4. Does the existing bus stop have passenger amenities (shelter & bench)? If no, is there ROW 1. Is the Site on a major arterial? 2. Is the Site located on an existing transit line? If so, indicate which route(s). [insert Location ID here]Page 1 of 6 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park and Ride Site Evaluation Form 3 (Excellent: 10 pts; Good: 8 pts; Fair: 6 pts; Poor: 0 pts) 2 (Yes: 10 pts; No: 0 pts) 1.5 (>10 mi: 10 pts; 5-10 mi: 7 pts; <5 mi different direction: 2 pts; <5 miles same direction: -40 pts) 1 (1-3 mi: 10 pts; 4-6 mi: 8 pts; 7-10 mi: 6 pts; >10 mi: 0 pts) 2 (Yes: 10 pts; Within 250 ft: 8 pts; Within 500 ft: 6 pts; Within 750 ft: 4 pts; Within 1,000 ft: 2 pts) 2.5 (At site: 10 pts; Within 250 ft: 8 pts; Within 500 ft: 6 pts; Within 750 ft: 4 pts; Within 1,000 ft: 2 pts) 3 (>10 spaces: 10 pts; 5-10 spaces: 7 pts; <5 spaces: 2 pts) 2 (ROW available & County owned: 10 pts; ROW available & Privately owned: 5 pts) 1 (Commercial or Industrial: 10 pts; Residential: 0 pts) of targeted ridership? Identify targeted ridership. 11. Is the anticipated commuter driving distance minimal (from home to the Site) for the majority 10. Is the Site in close proximity to an existing Park and Ride facility serving the same route? 9. Is the location on the correct side of the road for transit pickup (serving proper direction for anticipated demand)? 13. Are there pedestrian and/or bicycle facilities adjacent to the Site that connect to the transit 12. Is the Site within or adjacent to a commercial area? stop? Is adding infrastructure feasible? 8. Does the Site have sufficient access (ingress and egress) from the adjacent roadway? Score Weight Total 14. Does the Site have existing parking facilities that can be utilized? 16. If the answer to Question 14 was no, what is the location zoned as? 15. If the answer to Question 14 was no, is there available ROW at the Site for a minimum of 5 spaces? 10 spaces? More than 10 spaces? Is it owned by the County? [insert Location ID here]Page 2 of 6 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park and Ride Site Evaluation Form 1 (Excellent: 10 pts; Good: 8 pts; Fair: 3 pts; Poor: 0 pts) 1.5 (Within 6 months: 10 pts; Within 9 months: 8 pts; Over 9 months: 4 pts) 1 (Likely: 10 pts; May encourage: 5 pts; Not likely: 0 pts) 2.5 (Lighting: 2 pts; Cameras: 2 pts; Increased security: 5 pts; ADA compliant bus stop: 3 pts; Transfer facility: 10 pts or every additional route served: 2 pts NTE 10; Connection to other service route: 12 pts; Public restrooms: 5 pts; Established express, carpool, etc.: 2 pts; Serving underserved or isolated communities: 8 pts; Serving regional commuters: 10 pts; Serving location reaching parking capacity or P&R occurring informally: +10pts; Lack of available spaces: -3pts) 20. Include any additional Site benefits and/or negative features associated with this location. Score Weight Total 18. How much time is anticipated to acquire and develop the Site as a Park and Ride? 19. Would the Site encourage employee ride sharing? 17. Does the Site have capability for expansion? [insert Location ID here]Page 3 of 6 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park and Ride Site Evaluation Form Photos of Proposed Location Comments: [insert Location ID here]Page 4 of 6 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park and Ride Site Evaluation Form Photos of Proposed Location [insert Location ID here]Page 5 of 6 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park and Ride Site Evaluation Form Site Map of Proposed Location [insert Location ID here]Page 6 of 6 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) CAT Park-and-Ride Handbook PPS0715201202SWF 18 4.References AECOM. (June 2012). Florida Department of Transportation State Park-and-Ride Guide. Retrieved from https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default- source/content/transit/pages/finalparkandrideguide20120601.pdf?sfvrsn=a592696c_0 Coastal Region MPO. “Park and Ride Lot Initiative." https://www.thempc.org/Core/Pr#gsc.tab=0. Accessed July 2020. Collier County. 2020. Collier County Zoning. Accessed June 28, 2020. https://colliercountygmd.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=d3f4802ac5b74339b21b 27467ff4c9fb 9.F.2 Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: Appendix B -Park and Ride Handbook (14184 : Endorse Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study) 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Performance Targets for Calendar Year 2021 OBJECTIVE: For the Board to adopt the FDOT Safety Performance Targets for calendar year 2021. CONSIDERATIONS: The Safety Targets are the only federal Transportation Performance Measure (TPM) targets that must be established annually. State DOTs submit their Safety Targets to the US DOT through their Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP) each August. FDOT has notified the MPOs that it is staying with the zero target for all 5 safety performance measures. MPOs have until February 27 th in which to either adopted the Statewide targets or establish their own quantifiable Safety Targets. The MPO has previously chosen to adopt the FDOT statewide targets. The performance measures, statewide performance and 2021 Vision Zero targets are shown in the following table, which staff will update when FDOT provides the five-year rolling average performance data updated to calendar year 2019. Highway Safety (PM1) Conditions and Performance Performance Measures Florida Statewide Baseline Performance (Five-Year Rolling Average) Calendar Year 2021 Florida Performance Targets 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018 Number of Fatalities 2,688.2 2,825.4 2,972.0 0 Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million VMT 1.33 1.36 1.39 0 Number of Serious Injuries 20,844.2 20,929.2 20,738.4 0 Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million VMT 10.36 10.13 9.77 0 Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Non-Motorized Serious Injuries 3,294.4 3,304.2 3,339.6 0 On the same day that the TAC and CAC voted to endorse the Vision Zero targets, FDOT sent the MPOs an email explaining that Florida was among the states that failed to make significant progress towards their federal TPM Safety Targets and as a result, FDOT was required to develop a HSIP Implementation Plan describing what steps will be taken to move towards meeting the targets. The information, shown in Attachment 1, was shared with the TAC subsequent to its 9 am meeting and with the CAC at its 2pm meeting. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The TAC and CAC voted to endorse the FDOT Vision Zero Safety Performance Targets for calendar year 2021 at their meetings held on October 26, 2020. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board endorse the FDOT Vision Zero Safety Performance Targets for calendar year 2021. Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director 9.G Packet Pg. 744 11/13/2020 ATTACHMENT(S) 1. FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (PDF) 9.G Packet Pg. 745 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 9.G Doc ID: 14175 Item Summary: Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Performance Targets for Calendar Year 2021 Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 2:12 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 2:12 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/04/2020 2:31 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/04/2020 2:57 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 9.G Packet Pg. 746 From:Reichert, Mark To:Aileen Boucle; McLaughlinAnne; Austin Mount; Beth Alden; Beth Beltran; Bill Cross; Brian Freeman; Brian Pessaro; Carter, Laura; Chandra Frederick; Chris DeAnnuntis; Dave Hutchinson; David Green; Dawn Schwartz; Denise Bunnewith; Scott, Donald; Harrell, Gary; Gary Huttmann; Gillette, Georganna; Greg Burke; Greg Stuart; Hickman, Lisa; Hugh Pascoe; Jeff Kramer; Jeff Sheffield; Kevin Walford; Kostrzewa, Jack; Lex, Suzanne; lisa.colmenares@mdtpo.org; Bollenback, Lois; LantzLorraine; Woods, Michael; Mike Escalante; Mikyska, Carl; Marybeth Soderstrom; nuhren@palmbeachtpa.org; Steed, Patricia; Paul Flavien; buchwaldp@stlucieco.org; Reichert, Mark; Rob Balmes; Ron Gogoi; RyanKordek@polk-county.net; Koons, Scott; Slay, Greg; stevend@hernandocounty.us; Susan Ebner; Terry Pittos; Tracy Flavien; Virginia Whittington; Washnock, Mary Beth; Whit Blanton; Wilson Fernandez Cc:FDOT-Metropolitan Planning; Hollingsworth, Lora Subject:HSIP Implementation Plan Date:Monday, October 26, 2020 1:28:09 PM Attachments:image003.png 08 31 2020 performance letter to FHWA.pdf FLDOT_2020 HSIP Implementation Plan_Updated August 2020_Final.docx EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good afternoon, everyone. Since a couple of MPOs have asked, I’m sending the HSIP Implementation Plan out to everyone. States that fail to make significant progress towards their federal TPM Safety Targets must develop a HSIP Implementation Plan describing what actions will be taken to move the needle towards meeting the targets. Attached is the draft Plan. It is subject to additional review by FHWA, but this is the latest version submitted and I’ve been given the OK to share it. Please direct any questions to me and I’ll forward them to the right party. Thanks. Mark E. Reichert 605 Suwannee Street, MS 28 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450 850-414-4901 (office) 850-491-4503 (work cell) 850-556-5751 (personal cell) mark.reichert@dot.state.fl.us 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety The HSIP Implementation Plan demonstrates Florida’s progress toward meeting its annual safety performance targets as required by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) under 23 U.S.C. 148(i). The HSIP Implementation Plan will help the state continue to focus limited resources on reducing the number of fatalities and serious injuries on the transportation system with the understanding that no death is acceptable on Florida’s transportation system. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan i Table of Contents Florida’s Focus on Getting to Zero ............................................................................................................................. 1 The State of Traffic Safety .......................................................................................................................................... 2 HSIP Implementation Plan Objective ......................................................................................................................... 4 FDOT and Safety in Florida ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Highway Safety Improvement Program Funding ........................................................................................................ 8 Highway Safety Improvement Program Allocation Practices ................................................................................... 10 HSIP Programs, Strategies, and Activities ............................................................................................................... 12 Highway Safety Plan Program Funding ................................................................................................................... 13 Florida’s Strategic Safety Coalitions ......................................................................................................................... 13 Lane Departure and Intersection Coalition ............................................................................................................... 14 Alert Today, Alive Tomorrow .................................................................................................................................... 15 Florida Impaired Driving Coalition .............................................................................................................................. 2 Florida Occupant Protection Coalition ...................................................................................................................... 17 Ride Smart Florida .................................................................................................................................................... 18 Safe Mobility for Life Coalition .................................................................................................................................. 19 Florida Teen Safe Driving Coalition .......................................................................................................................... 20 Traffic Records Coordinating Committee ................................................................................................................. 21 Additional Actions to Achieve Safety Performance Targets ..................................................................................... 22 Florida Safety Coalitions and Community Traffic Safety Teams .............................................................................. 23 Tracking Progress ..................................................................................................................................................... 24 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan ii List of Tables Table 1. HSIP Summary Table ....................................................................................................................... 9 Table 2. Federal Fiscal Year 2020 HSP Allocations .................................................................................... 13 List of Figures Figure 1: Selected External Factors Influencing Fatalities and Serious Injuries ............................................. 2 Figure 2. Roadway Fatalities 2012-2018 ......................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3: Florida’s Alignment with the National Safety Goal ........................................................................... 5 Figure 4. Plans and Processes Supporting Zero Fatalities ............................................................................. 8 Figure 5. HSIP Funding Summary ................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 6. Factors Supporting Zero Fatalities ................................................................................................. 11 Figure 7. Overview of Project Development Cycle and Phases .................................................................... 12 Figure 8. Roadway Fatalities, 2005-2018 ...................................................................................................... 25 Figure 9. Roadway Serious Injuries, 2005-2018 ........................................................................................... 25 Figure 10. Roadway Fatality Rate per 100M VMT, 2005-2018 ............................................................. 26 Figure 11. Roadway Serious Injury Rate per 100M VMT, 2005-2018 ............................................................. 27 Figure 12. Non-motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries, 2005-2018 ............................................................ 27 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 1 Florida’s Focus on Getting to Zero Florida shares the national traffic safety vision, “Toward Zero Deaths,” and formally adopted its own version, “Driving Down Fatalities,” in 2012. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and its traffic safety partners are committed to eliminating fatalities and serious injuries with the understanding that the death of any person is unacceptable, and therefore, zero deaths is the state’s safety performance target. This target is consistent throughout Florida’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and Highway Safety Plan (HSP). Florida’s toward zero deaths vision is documented as the statewide performance measure in the Florida HSIP annual report. Starting in the 2017 HSIP annual report, FDOT established statewide 2018 safety targets, which set the target at “0” for each safety performance measure to reflect the department’s vision of zero deaths. This target was reaffirmed in 2019 and in 2020 continues to reflect Florida’s commitment to zero fatalities and serious injuries. Florida is federally required to track and report performance on five safety factors, including:  Number of fatalities;  Rate of fatalities;  Number of serious injuries;  Rate of serious injuries; and  Number of non-motorized fatalities and number of non-motorized serious injuries. Between 2015 and 2018, FDOT worked with Florida’s 27 metropolitan planning organizations (MPO) to establish both the state and MPO safety targets. For the first time, FDOT had a conversation specifically with the MPOs about safety targets, and as a result, 21 of Florida’s 27 MPOs support the zero performance target. The projects in the HSIP and the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) reflect the collaboration between the MPOs, FDOT Districts, and FDOT Central Office in recognizing those targets and jointly implementing strategies to achieve them. On April, 24. 2020, Florida received a letter from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) evaluating the progress made toward achieving safety targets. FHWA determined that Florida did not meet or make significant progress toward meeting its targets of zero for each of the five federal performance measures. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 2 The State of Traffic Safety Achieving zero fatalities will take: Commitment Energy Focus FDOT and its safety partners recognize achieving zero fatalities and serious injuries will not be easy. That is why FDOT assembled 260 safety stakeholders from across the state in Jacksonville on May 6 and 7, 2019 to determine who else needed to be involved in the drive to zero and what more could be done individually and collectively to reduce fatalities and serious injuries. During this Florida Vision Zero Workshop, participants discussed trends on fatalities and serious injuries and other trends that impact traffic safety. The many external factors that can impact traffic related fatalities and serious injuries were noted, including those in the figure below: Figure 1 : Selected External Factors Influencing Fatalities and Serious Injuries 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 3 Despite the impacts of external factors, Florida’s fatalities remain flat while serious injuries have begun to slowly decline. Over the previous two years, traffic related fatalities decreased from 3,176 in 2016 to 3,116 in 2017. In 2018, fatalities increased slightly to 3,135 but did not reach the 2016 peak. Preliminary data for 2019 suggest total fatalities have increased again, reaching 3,218 (Figure 2). Figure 2 . Roadway Fatalities 2012-2018 Workshop participants learned about Vision Zero principles and how Vision Zero is implemented in Florida. Following presentations on Connecting Effective Strategies, attendees participated in group table discussions and were asked to provide their ideas on other effective strategies to improve safety on all of Florida’s roadways, how they could use the strategies in their own jurisdictions, and how they could be adapted to other applications. The process was replicated following presentations on Identifying New and Innovative Strategies, with participants asked to comment on what new strategies should be considered, if they were near-term or long-term strategies, and what level of impact would be expected from each strategy. The strategies identified during this meeting have informed the update of the SHSP and actions of Florida’s strategic safety coalitions. Participants were also encouraged to apply these concepts in their communities, where applicable, to improve traffic safety and advance Florida’s safety vision. The following themes emerged from the discussion and will be incorporated into Florida’s safety planning efforts:  Focus on moving people and goods instead of moving vehicles  Improve coordination among Florida’s safety partners at state, regional, and local levels  Embrace technology and data as an effective safety solution/tool 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 4 HSIP Implementation Plan Objective This HSIP Implementation Plan documents Florida’s HSIP funding and project decisions for the upcoming fiscal year to meet or make significant progress toward meeting its safety performance targets in subsequent years. The HSIP Implementation Plan is an opportunity for FDOT and its partners to:  Re-evaluate HSIP investment decisions;  Ensure that projects identified, prioritized, and programmed in the state have the best potential for reducing serious injuries and fatalities;  Identify roadway features that constitute the greatest hazard to road users;  Determine available funding;  Determine funding allocation goals;  Provide an overview of HSIP programs, strategies, and activities; and  Summarize actions that are anticipated to achieve safety performance targets. FDOT and Safety in Florida FDOT’s mission is to “provide a safe transportation system that ensures the mobility of people and goods, enhances economic prosperity, and preserves the quality of our environment and communities.” The following figure highlights the relationship of core FDOT functions and the zero deaths vision. To achieve its mission of a safe transportation system, FDOT coordinates with MPOs and local governments to align safety priorities at the regional and local levels. Transportation projects are identified and prioritized with Florida’s 27 MPOs as well as local governments in non-metropolitan areas. Data are analyzed for each potential project, using traffic safety data and traffic demand modeling, among other data. MPOs and local governments consider safety data analyses when determining project priorities. Florida’s transportation decisions are guided by several documents including the Florida Transportation Plan (FTP), the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS), the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and the Highway Safety Plan (HSP). Other programs that help the state achieve the safety target include the Program Planning Workshops and the Development, Design, and Construction Standards. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 5 Figure 3 : Florida’s Alignment with the National Safety Goal Florida Transportation Plan (FTP) The FTP is the single overarching statewide plan that guides Florida’s transportation future. Safety is the first goal identified in the FTP. The core component of the FTP is the Policy Element, which defines the goals, objectives, and strategies for Florida’s transportation future over the next 25 years and provides guidance in making transportation decisions. The number of transportation related fatalities is one of the progress indicators identified in the plan. The FTP update is scheduled to be completed by December 2020. The updated plan remains focused on safety as a priority and reaffirms the state’s vision of zero transportation fatalities and serious injuries. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 6 Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) The SHSP is the statewide plan focusing on how to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. The SHSP is updated at least every five years by FDOT in coordination with statewide, regional, and local safety partners. The 2016-2020 SHSP embraces Vision Zero (Driving Down Fatalities) and identifies potential strategies to achieve zero traffic deaths on all public roads. The SHSP update is underway and scheduled to be completed in early 2021. The updated plan remains focused on countermeasures that advance Florida’s vision of zero transportation fatalities and serious injuries. Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Policy Plan The SIS is Florida’s high priority network of transportation facilities important to the state's economy and mobility. The SIS focuses the state's limited transportation resources on the facilities most significant for interregional, interstate, and international travel. The SIS program considers the potential reduction of traffic fatalities and serious injuries as a factor for ranking potential projects. The SIS Policy Plan update is scheduled to begin in early 2021. Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP) The STIP is a federally mandated document which must include a listing of projects planned with federal participation in the next four fiscal years. All projects in the STIP support progress towards achieving the performance targets. The STIP prioritization process continues to use a data-driven method and stakeholder input to evaluate projects that have an anticipated effect of reducing both fatal and injury crashes. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) The Florida HSIP is a core federal-aid program that funds safety projects and programs, oversees and helps implement strategies from the SHSP, and achieves a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads leading to zero deaths. A list of HSIP projects can be found in the HSIP 2019 Annual Report. FTP Goal: Safety & Security for Residents, Visitors, and Businesses FTP Objective: Prevent transportation related fatalities and serious injuries. FTP Objective: Reduce the number of crashes on the transportation system. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 7 Highway Safety Plan (HSP) Florida’s HSP is the data-driven planning document that guides the implementation of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) Section 402 Highway Safety Program and Section 405 National Priority Safety Programs in Florida, which assist the state in designing traffic safety programs to reduce traffic crashes, deaths, and injuries. The funding is used for behavioral program areas such as impaired driving, occupant protection, motorcycle safety, distracted driving, speed/aggressive driving, teen driver, pedestrian/bicycle, and aging road user countermeasures, police traffic services, work zone safety, and community traffic safety, in addition to traffic records improvements. The performance targets for fatalities, fatality rate, and serious injuries in the HSP are identical to those in the HSIP. Program Planning Workshops The FDOT Work Program Office holds Program Planning Workshops annually to determine the level of funding to be allocated over the next five to 10 years to preserve and provide for a safe transportation system. After projects are prioritized collaboratively by the MPOs, local governments, and FDOT Districts, certain funding types are then further analyzed and prioritized by FDOT Central Office. Florida Project Development, Design, and Construction Standards Florida design and construction standards include safety criteria and countermeasures, which are incorporated in every construction project. These safety measures are implemented as part of the total project and are funded using a combination of state and/or federal funds beyond allocated federal safety dollars. The Florida Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Manual requires the consideration of safety when preparing a proposed project’s purpose and need, and defines several factors related to safety, including crash modification factors and safety performance factors, as part of the analysis of alternatives. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 8 Figure 4 . Plans and Processes Supporting Zero Fatalities Highway Safety Improvement Program Funding The HSIP is a state-administered, federal-aid highway program with the purpose of reducing traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. Funding is apportioned to Florida per Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act formulas explained on the FHWA website. In recent years, Florida received over $100 million annually for the HSIP. A prioritized list of safety needs is maintained by each District. Proposed HSIP projects are authorized and funded based assessments of District-level and statewide needs. Florida received an allocation of approximately $155 million in HSIP funds during the 2018 state fiscal year from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019, and fully allocated those funds to safety projects. FDOT used these HSIP funds to complete 391 projects, which address the safety categories of intersections, lane departure mitigation, pedestrian and bicyclist safety, and other programs representing the remaining SHSP emphasis areas. Table 1 summarizes the estimated number of projects and funding goals by program, strategy, or activity. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 9 Table 1 . HSIP Summary Table Program, Strategy or Activity Estimated # Projects Estimated Funding (million) Data 63 $23.01 Intersection 71 $32.40 Lane Departure 74 $43.01 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety 182 $50.02 Multiple 3 $0.17 Speeding and Aggressive Driving 1 $6.58 Total 394 $155.1 Regarding roadway ownership, state-maintained roadways were addressed by 260 projects using about $103 million in HSIP funds. Local roadways were addressed by 65 projects using about $20 million. Non-infrastructure such as preliminary engineering, public information or education, traffic engineering studies, and transportation statistics were supported with 69 projects using about $31 million. Figure 5 . HSIP Funding Summary 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 10 Highway Safety Improvement Program Allocation Practices FDOT is responsible for managing the HSIP, as well as providing strategy guidance, policies, and tools to the Districts, Turnpike Enterprise, and local agencies responsible for administration and delivery of highway safety improvement projects. 23 USC 148(c) indicates a focused, data-driven approach should be used for safety problem identification, countermeasure analysis, and resource allocation. Safety funds should be used on the most effective countermeasures at the locations with the greatest needs. FDOT actively uses the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Highway Safety Manual (HSM) and other proven data-driven approaches to reduce fatalities and serious injuries. To be eligible for Florida HSIP funds, all safety improvement projects must address at least one of the 13 SHSP emphasis areas and provide an expected reduction in fatalities and serious injuries. Also considered are roadway ownership (e.g., state vs. local roads), improvement type (e.g., spot vs. systemic safety improvements), and other relevant categories. The 13 emphasis areas in the 2016-2020 Florida SHSP, which were selected by analyzing fatality and serious injury data, are: Florida addresses funding needs primarily by SHSP emphasis areas (e.g., lane departure, intersections), and roadway features are examined in the process. As defined in the FDOT HSIP Guideline Manual (1991), “a hazardous location is defined as having an abnormal amount of crashes or a high potential for severe crashes, and for which a remedial action is not immediately possible.” A safety engineer is employed in each of the seven Districts to investigate hazardous locations, perform analyses, and make recommendations for improvements. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 11 Figure 6 . Factors Supporting Zero Fatalities FDOT updates the HSIP annually, working closely with FDOT districts and other traffic safety partners to analyze crash data and identify projects that apply proven countermeasures to locations with a high frequency or high rate of crashes specific to one of the 13 Emphasis Areas identified in the SHSP. The annual update process requires an evaluation of trends and contributing factors related to traffic crashes, fatalities, and serious injuries resulting in an evolving list of projects prioritized in coordination with regional and local partners. FDOT closely monitors emerging safety trends and challenges, working with regional and local safety partners to amend the HSIP project list when necessary. While these projects and the associated policies and standards may take years to be implemented, they are built on proven countermeasures for improving safety and addressing specific safety challenges. Florida continues to allocate all available HSIP funding to these projects. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 12 Figure 7 . Overview of Project Development Cycle and Phases HSIP Programs, Strategies, and Activities The HSIP programs, strategies, and activities are informed by Florida’s SHSP and research conducted as part of the HSIP development process. These efforts address roadway features that constitute a hazard to road users, as well as highway safety improvement projects that were identified through a data-driven process of crash experience, crash potential, or other data-supported means. A list of HSIP projects can be found in the HSIP 2019 Annual Report. Hazardous locations may come to the attention of the District Safety Engineer from Citizen complaints Florida Highway Patrol troopers Incident reports Pavement skid tests District personnel 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 13 Highway Safety Plan Program Funding For Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2020, FDOT has allocated $10,452,316 in Section 402 State and Community Highway Safety Grant Program funds and $13,324,700 in Section 405 National Priority Safety Program funds. Projects included in the Safety program will address multiple SHSP emphasis areas. Table 2 . Federal F iscal Year 2020 HSP Allocations Safety Category Funding Aging Road Users $555,219 Community Traffic Safety Outreach $504,500 Distracted Driving $89,500 Impaired Driving $2,407,564 Motorcycle Safety $1,561,870 Occupant Protection and Child Passenger Safety $1,225,350 Paid Media $6,314,084 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety $2,700,560 Planning and Administration $475,000 Police Traffic Services – Law Enforcement Liaison (LEL) $1,300,000 Public Traffic Safety Professionals Training $1,611,650 Speed/Aggressive Driving $1,331,000 Teen Driver Safety $474,852 Traffic Records $3,152,867 Work Zone Safety $73,000 Total $23,777,016 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 14 FDOT awards subgrants to traffic safety partners who undertake priority area programs, initiatives, and activities to improve traffic safety and reduce crashes, serious injuries, and fatalities. Subgrants may be awarded for addressing traffic safety deficiencies, expansion of an ongoing activity, or development of a new program. Entities apply for funding through FDOT by submitting concept papers which describe their proposed efforts. Project funding decisions are based on:  How well the proposed effort meets the goals of the SHSP and the goals of the coalitions and stakeholders;  Where the project’s location ranks within the Florida Highway Safety Matrix;  NHTSA assessment recommendations; and  Whether evidence of a problem is supported by state and local traffic safety data and/or citation data. FDOT developed objective, data-driven tools to identify traffic safety problems and the geographic areas of the state that represent the highest number of crashes, fatalities, and serious injuries. The Florida Highway Safety Matrix ranks combined fatality and serious injury data in county- and city-level matrices, which provide Florida decision-makers with critical information about the status of traffic safety in counties and cities throughout the State. Specific measures in the matrix are as follows:  Distracted Driving;  Drivers 65+;  Impaired Driving;  Motorcycle Related;  Occupant Protection;  Pedestrian or Bicyclist Related;  Speed or Aggressive Driving Related;  Teen Drivers; and  Work Zones. Florida’s Annual Report, submitted to NHTSA each December 31, describes how funded projects helped Florida meet its behavioral-related highway safety performance targets, an assessment of the state's progress in achieving performance targets, and how the state will adjust its next HSP to meet performance targets that were not met. Starting in FFY 2018 HSP, Florida’s performance targets were set at “0” for each performance measure, with the exception of the seat belt use rate which was set to 100 percent, to reflect FDOT zero deaths vision. More detail can be found in Florida’s FFY2019 HSP Annual Report. Eligible for Funding Government agencies, Political subdivisions of state, local, city and county government agencies, Law enforcement agencies State colleges and state universities School districts Fire departments Public emergency service providers Qualified non-profit organizations (e.g., MADD, SADD, etc.). 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 13 Florida’s Strategic Safety Coalitions Florida manages implementation of much of its safety program through statewide coalitions that are organized based on the SHSP emphasis areas. This structure helped institutionalize safety throughout the state and ensure that all aspects of safety are addressed by a broad group of safety stakeholders at quarterly coalition meetings. The coalitions are: Florida Lane Departure and Intersection Coalition Florida Impaired Driving Coalition Alert Today, Alive Tomorrow: Florida 's Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Coalition Florida Occupant Protection Coalition Motorcycle Safety Coalition Safe Mobility for Life Coalition (Aging Road Users) Florida Teen Safe Driving Coalition Traffic Records Coordinating Committee This section provides the following information for each of Florida’s Strategic Safety Coalitions: Purpose - Describes the purpose of this program, strategy, or activity (i.e., what problem does it address), and how it relates back to the SHSP Coalition Mission – Describes the focus of the representative coalition Countermeasures - Lists the types of countermeasures or improvements that will be implemented as part of these projects Benefits - How the program, strategy, or activity will contribute to a reduction in fatalities and serious injuries and help the state make progress toward achieving the safety performance targets The following information is also included for coalitions supported through the HSIP Program Funding - Estimated cost for the program, strategy, or activity Methodology and Implementation Plan – Describes the methodology that was used to identify projects under this program, strategy, or activity 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 14 Florida’s eight Safety Coalitions bring together multiple traffic safety partners, technical stakeholders, and subject matter experts from various disciplines who review available data; develop and prioritize strategies; and implement and monitor progress of programs and initiatives to reduce fatalities and serious injuries associated with their Coalition’s area of focus. Input on safety priorities and activities comes from traffic safety coalitions, advocates, FDOT District Traffic Safety Engineers, law enforcement officers and their leadership, emergency responders, judges, Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), Students Against Destructive Decisions (SADD), and many other state and local agencies. Lane Departure and Intersection Coalition Purpose More people are killed in lane departure crashes than any other type of crash, both in Florida and nationally. According to the SHSP, lane departures represent 30 percent of all crashes but account for 47 percent of all deaths. Both driver behavior and roadway design play a role in the number and severity of lane departure crashes. A driver who is speeding, distracted, drowsy, or impaired is likely to have difficulty staying in the lane. A roadway that is slick and wet, an object that is too close to the road, or a shoulder or curve that does not allow for any error can also contribute to a lane departure crash. An intersection is a potential point of conflict that relies on signage, traffic control devices, roadway design, lighting, the good behavior of users, and other factors to ensure everyone navigates through safely. The traffic safety focus at intersections is motivated by the 24 percent increase in fatalities and the three percent increase in serious injuries between 2015 and 2018. Intersections present a wide range of safety challenges for different users and modes. According to the Florida SHSP, pedestrians and bicyclists are involved in less than five percent of all intersection crashes, yet account for more than 17 percent of the fatalities. Intersections also create risks for aging road users because as people age, there are declines in visual, cognitive, and physical abilities. This creates additional difficulties for aging road users in some situations such as making left turns, changing lanes, and navigating through intersections. Sixty percent of aging driver fatal crashes involved a failure to yield the right of way. Coalition Mission The mission of the Lane Departure and Intersection Coalition is to analyze data, develop strategies, and implement improvements to eliminate fatal and serious injury crashes for both intersections and lane departures. With assistance from the Federal Highway Administration, the Coalition is working on developing a plan for intersections. In putting the plan together, the Coalition relied on the progress made by other statewide coalitions such as the Safe Mobility for Life Coalition and the Florida Impaired Driving Coalition. Cost The HSIP identified 71 projects for a total of approximately $32 million to maximize safety benefits at intersections and 74 projects for a total of approximately $43 million to continue to reduce lane departures. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 15 Methodology and Implementation Plan  Limit conflicts through geometric, traffic control, and lighting improvements.  Institute and promote Highway Safety Manual analyses and road safety audits/assessments using multi- disciplinary teams to review the operations and safety for all intersection users.  Identify locations using crash frequency and crash rate to inform the HSIP. Countermeasures INTERSECTION  Use traditional and alternative designs and technologies to reduce conflict risks such as innovative interchange designs, access management, and roundabouts.  Improve the awareness and visibility of traffic control devices so all users can safety navigate an intersection. LANE DEPARTURE  Install rumble strips.  Widen pavement/shoulder.  Install/improve signage.  Install/improve pavement marking and/or delineation.  Install/improve lighting.  Add/upgrade/modify/remove traffic signal(s). Benefits This program will help keep vehicles on the roadway in their appropriate directional lane; reduce the potential for crashes when vehicles do leave the roadway or cross into opposing traffic lanes; and minimize the severity of crashes that do occur. It will also reduce the frequency and severity of crashes at intersections. Alert Today, Alive Tomorrow Purpose Florida seeks to be a quality place for people to live, learn, work, and play, and is working to ensure everyone has convenient and safe choices for transportation, including walking, biking, and transit. Approximately two-thirds of pedestrian and bicyclist-related fatal crashes occur outside of a marked crosswalk or bicycle lane. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 16 Coalition Mission Florida’s pedestrian and bicycle safety coalition – Alert Today, Alive Tomorrow – is comprised of a diverse group of national, state, and local partners and safety advocates that prioritizes and implements the strategies identified in the statewide Pedestrian and Bicycle Strategic Safety Plan (PBSSP) to reduce pedestrian and bicycle related fatalities and serious injuries resulting from traffic crash involvement on Florida’s roadways. The goal of the Coalition, which meets regularly to discuss and update the progress of PBSSP implementation is to:  Advance data collection, analysis, and evaluation;  Establish clear priorities that guide the implementation of safety strategies towards areas with the highest representation of traffic crashes resulting in fatalities or serious injuries to pedestrians and bicyclists; and  Eliminate pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities and serious injuries resulting from traffic crashes on public roads by decreasing the number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries based on the five-year rolling average as established in the HSIP and/or SHSP. Cost The HSIP identified 182 projects for approximately $50 million focused on reducing the frequency and severity of pedestrian and bicyclist related crashes. Methodology and Implementation Plan  Bicycle crash and exposure data are used to identify locations using crash frequency and crash rate to inform the HSIP.  Locations with a high proportion of wet weather crashes are included in the screening process for skid hazard project locations.  Pedestrians crash and population data are used to identify locations using crash frequency and rate, as well as contributing factors such as time of day, to inform the HSIP.  Projects are identified using GIS analysis of crash locations and frequency. Countermeasures  Install sidewalks to avoid walking along roadways.  Install pedestrian refuge islands.  Install raised median and crosswalk.  Improve lighting at intersections.  Provide bike lanes.  Provide a bicycle box (advance stop bar to leave space for cyclists).  Add exclusive pedestrian phasing to signalized intersection.  Restrict parking near intersections. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 2  Convert unsignalized intersection to roundabout.  Improve/install pedestrian crossing.  Install pedestrian countdown signal heads. Benefits Infrastructure for walking and bicycling can help reduce crashes and injuries or fatalities by contributing to traffic calming measures. Installing bicycle lanes, sidewalks, or other improvements can help reduce vehicle travel lane width and make pedestrians and bicyclists more visible to drivers. These changes to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists are often effective at slowing traffic to a people-friendly speed and help ensure speed limit compliance by matching the physical design of the road to the posted speed limit. Florida Impaired Driving Coalition Purpose Despite impressive efforts to reduce traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries in Florida over the past several years, the number of alcohol and/or drug involved crashes, fatalities, and injuries continues to be a challenge in Florida's goal to reach zero fatalities. As a percent of all crash fatalities, alcohol and/or drug impaired driving fatalities in Florida slowly declined from 29 percent in 2011 to 27 percent in 2015, according to NHTSA. During that same time period, the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (FLHSMV) reported 7,252 serious injuries and 4,030 fatalities due to alcohol and/or drug impaired driving. Despite implementation of many proven countermeasures, the number of alcohol and/or drug impaired driving crashes, fatalities, and injuries continue to be unacceptable. Florida is dedicated to continuing to reduce the number of alcohol and/or drug impaired driving fatalities and serious injuries. Coalition Mission In 2009, FDOT established the Florida Impaired Driving Coalition (FIDC). The FIDC was formed to identify and prioritize the state’s most pressing alcohol and/or drug impaired driving issues, review proven strategies, develop and approve a strategic plan that maximizes the state’s ability to impact these crashes, and oversee implementation of the strategic plan. Agencies and organizations responsible for components of Florida’s impaired driving system, or those agencies working to impact the effects of impaired driving, participate in the FIDC. Countermeasures  Combine high visibility enforcement with increased public awareness of the dangers, costs, and consequences of impaired driving, with emphasis on high-risk populations and locations.  Reduce repeat impaired driving behavior through targeted enforcement, effective and efficient prosecution, enhanced penalties for subsequent offenses, and improved evaluation, intervention, and treatment of substance abuse. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 17  Identify opportunities to prevent or counteract impaired driving through training of law enforcement, court, and substance abuse treatment personnel, recognition of emerging trends and new best practices, use of tools such as ignition interlock devices, and revision of laws and rules. Benefits Increased education and high visibility enforcement paired with stronger legislation can help reduce the number of impaired drivers on Florida’s roadways. Florida Occupant Protection Coalition Purpose Florida reached a historic record for statewide safety belt usage of 90.6 percent in 2018. Observed safety belt usage in Florida rose 30 percentage points in the last 17 years and increased approximately eight percentage points in ten years’ time, from 81.7 percent in 2008 to 89.6 percent in 2019. Florida's primary safety belt law became effective in 2009. The law requires that all drivers, all front seat passengers, and all passengers under the age of 18 wear safety belts. Children under age four must be in a safety seat, and children ages four and five must be in either a safety seat or a booster seat; some exemptions apply to cars manufactured prior to 1968 and trucks prior to 1972. Despite these impressive gains in safety belt usage and the implementation of many proven countermeasures, efforts to reduce the number of traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries involving unrestrained vehicle occupants in Florida over the past few years continues to be a challenge in the state’s goal to reach zero fatalities. As a percent of all crash fatalities, occupant protection related fatalities in Florida have slowly declined from 25.7 percent in 2011 to 23.2 percent in 2016 (NHTSA). During that same period, the FLHSMV reported 3,671 fatalities and 11,309 serious injuries due to lack of or improper occupant restraint use. Florida’s occupant protection program involves enforcement, communication, and the education necessary to achieve significant, lasting increases in safety belt and child safety seat usage. Florida is dedicated to continuing to reduce the number of fatalities and serious injuries related to unrestrained vehicle occupants. Coalition Mission FDOT conducted a NHTSA technical assessment of Florida’s occupant protection countermeasures program in March 2016. Following a key recommendation from the assessment, in 2017 FDOT established the Florida Occupant Protection Coalition (FOPC). The FOPC was formed to identify and prioritize the state’s most pressing occupant protection issues, review proven strategies, develop and approve a strategic plan that maximizes the state’s ability to impact crashes involving unrestrained vehicle occupants, and oversee implementation of the strategic plan. Countermeasures  Improve occupant protection-related education, communication, and outreach. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 18  Encourage enforcement of occupant protection laws and increase occupant protection awareness among law enforcement.  Improve and expand occupant protection for children.  Identify and share model laws that would increase use of occupant protection devices. Benefits Increased education and high visibility enforcement paired with stronger legislation can increase the number of drivers and passengers choosing to wear proper safety restraints and reduce the number of fatalities and serious injuries related to unrestrained or improperly restrained drivers and passengers. Ride Smart Florida Purpose Motorcycles are a mode of transportation that is more vulnerable to serious injuries and fatalities as compared to other motor vehicles such as cars and trucks. Florida’s sunny weather, beautiful beaches, and scenic highways make it a popular place for motorcycle enthusiasts, and the state is host to popular motorcycle rallies such as Biketoberfest and Daytona Bike Week. During the past decade, Florida observed an unusual increase in serious motorcycle injuries and fatalities as well as a continued increase in motorcycle registrations. Coalition Mission The mission of Ride Smart Florida is to focus funding and resources on the areas with the greatest opportunity to reduce motorcycle fatalities, serious injuries, and crashes. Ride Smart Florida is responsible for the development of Florida’s Motorcycle Strategic Safety plan or MSSP. The MSSP is designed to provide a comprehensive strategy to address motorcycle safety issues by identifying goals, strategies, action steps, and performance measures for key program areas. The five-year plan provides guidance to the FDOT Motorcycle Safety Program and key stakeholders concerned with improving motorcycle safety. Countermeasures  Manage motorcycle safety activities in Florida as part of a comprehensive plan that includes centralized program planning, implementation, coordination, and evaluation to maximize the effectiveness of programs and reduce duplication of effort.  Collect and analyze data on motorcycle crashes, injuries, and fatalities and provide local and state agencies with the best available data to make appropriate and timely decisions that improve motorcycle safety in Florida.  Ensure quality and consistency in the rider training program so students will receive the level of information and experience necessary to properly prepare them for real-world riding situations. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 19  Increase the number of law enforcement agencies, emergency medical service agencies, and trauma centers that have policies, goals, and outreach efforts with regard to motorcycle safety.  Manage motorcycle safety through engineering practices as a part of a comprehensive plan that includes centralized program coordination, planning, design, implementation, and evaluation to maximize the effectiveness of programs and practices.  Support legislative and judicial initiatives that promote motorcycle-related laws and regulations that improve motorcycle rider safety.  Manage motorcycle safety activities in Florida as part of a comprehensive plan that includes centralized program planning, implementation, coordination, and evaluation to maximize the effectiveness of programs. Benefits Streamlining motorcycle safety activities and providing accurate data helps provide efficient and effective data- driven decision making related to motorcycle safety. Quality training programs create better motorcycle riders and better engineering and education helps reduce conflicts between riders and drivers, reducing the number of motorcycle crashes. Safe Mobility for Life Coalition Purpose The growth of the aging population will have a profound impact on Florida’s economy and way of life particularly when it comes to transportation. Today’s older adults are not only living longer, they are driving longer than any other generation in history. Research indicates these individuals can expect to outlive their ability to drive safely by seven to ten years. All of this means more cars on the road, which inevitably increases the exposure and risk for all road users. Coalition Mission It is the coalition's mission to reduce crashes by improving the safety, access, and mobility of Florida's aging road users. The coalition oversees the development and implementation of Florida's Aging Road User Strategic Plan that includes six focus areas – program management, data, and evaluation; outreach and advocacy; aging in place; licensing and enforcement; prevention and assessment; and transitioning from driving. The purpose of the strategic plan is to improve the safety, access, and mobility of Florida's aging population by addressing areas critical to the needs and concerns of the target population. Countermeasures  Promote and educate drivers on comprehensive driving evaluations and safety strategies to prevent crashes. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 20  Expand transportation choices and promote community design features to meet the mobility needs of an aging population.  Develop and distribute resources and tools to support safe driving skills and encourage early planning to safely transition from driving. Benefits Increased education paired with increased transportation choices and accessibility can help .increase the number of aging road users who choose to transition from driving when they are no longer comfortable behind the wheel, reducing the number of crashes involving aging road users. Florida Teen Safe Driving Coalition Purpose Teen drivers do not have years of experience in recognizing and avoiding dangerous situations. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for U.S. teens. Six teens ages 16 to 19 die every day from motor vehicle injuries. Per mile driven, teen drivers ages 16 to 19 are nearly three times more likely than drivers aged 20 and older to be in a fatal crash. Fortunately, teen motor vehicle crashes are preventable and proven strategies can improve the safety of young drivers on the road. Coalition Mission The Florida Teen Safe Driving Coalition (FTSDC) was created in 2011 by the National Safety Council (NSC), in partnership with FDOT, to address the issue of teen traffic safety. Florida has one of 10 teen safe driving coalitions across the country formed by the NSC and the Allstate Foundation to establish a culture of teen safe driving based on the proven principles of Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL). In Florida, the role of the FTSDC is to identify the state’s most pressing teen safe driving issues and maximize the ability to reduce teen driver crashes, serious injuries, and fatalities. Countermeasures  Educate teens, parents, and caregivers about safe driving behaviors and Florida’s teen licensing law(s).  Draft model language that aligns Florida’s graduated driver licensing requirements with the national model. Benefits Increased education paired with stronger graduated driver licensing requirements can provide additional time for inexperienced teen drivers to become comfortable behind the wheel and encourage teen drivers to make safe decisions, reducing the number of crashes involving teen drivers. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 21 Traffic Records Coordinating Committee Purpose The improvements Florida makes to its transportation system are all data driven, many times with a specific focus on improving the safety of an existing or planned facility. It is critical that the data used to make these decisions is readily available, accurate, and consistent across all data sources. Multiple agencies are responsible for managing Florida’s safety data, and the Traffic Records Coordinating Committee (TRCC) provides a forum for these agencies to better align their data systems and improve their accessibility, completeness, timeliness, accuracy, and uniformity. Coalition Mission Florida’s Traffic Records Coordinating Committee (TRCC) is a statewide stakeholder forum created to facilitate the planning, coordinating, and implementation of projects to improve the state’s traffic records information systems. Through the coordinated efforts of its member organizations, the TRCC provides a forum for the creation, implementation, and management of a traffic safety information system that provides accessible, accurate, complete, consistent, integrated, and timely traffic safety data to the state of Florida Countermeasures  Provide ongoing coordination in support of multiagency initiatives and projects which improve traffic records information systems.  Develop and maintain complete, accurate, uniform, and timely traffic records data.  Provide the ability to link traffic records data.  Facilitate access to traffic records data.  Promote the use of traffic records data. Benefits Increasing quality, consistency, timeliness, and accessibility of traffic records data helps the state identify potential safety solutions using data-driven processes to continue to reduce traffic crashes, fatalities, and serious injuries. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 22 Additional Actions to Achieve Safety Performance Targets Florida’s Vital Few As an agency, FDOT has elected to focus limited resources on initiatives that advance four areas identified as Florida’s Vital Few – Improving Safety, Enhancing Mobility, Inspiring a Culture of Innovation, and Fostering a Talented Workforce. Florida’s vital few builds on the state’s vision of zero transportation fatalities and serious injuries. The Vital Few Safety Team is organized into three groups focusing on fatalities and serious injuries involving lane departures, intersections, and bicyclists and pedestrians. Each Vital Few Safety Team involves a multidisciplinary team representing design, safety, public information, construction, planning, traffic operations, maintenance, and multiple modes of transportation from all regions of the state. Each of the three groups that make up the Vital Few Safety Team identified countermeasures that have already been implemented or new countermeasures that could be implemented to reduce the number of fatalities and/or serious injuries within their focus area. Vital Few Safety Team Countermeasures Implemented Lane Departures • 23 Countermeasures Implemented since 2013 Intersections • 20 Countermeasures Implemented since 2013 • 1 Countermeasure In Development • 4 New Countermeasures Identified for Fiscal Year 2021 Bicyclists and Pedestrians • 23 Countermeasures Implemented since 2013 • 2 Countermeasure In Development • 3 New Countermeasures Identified for Fiscal Year 2021 New Initiatives In addition to the HSIP and HSP, FDOT initiated new policies and programs to further support the achievement of zero traffic fatalities. SAFE STRIDES 2 Zero: The System Analysis and Forecast Evaluation (SAFE) State Traffic Roadway and Intersection Evaluation System 2020 (STRIDES) 2 Zero program applies FDOT data to evaluate safety and mobility at intersections and roadway segments. The program focuses on enhancing the highway safety management network screening method thorough quantitative evaluation of intersections and roadway segments, application of predictive crash tools, and safety performance monitoring before and after engineering countermeasures are implemented. Complete Streets: FDOT adopted its Complete Streets policy in 2014 and provided implementation guidance in its Context Classification Handbook in 2017. The publication of the Florida Design Manual (FDM) in 2018 kicked off implementation of Complete Streets for all state road projects. FDOT is currently implementing four speed 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 23 management projects that will apply new best practices to state roadways where traffic speeds have been found detrimental to pedestrian safety. Lessons learned from these projects are being fed back into the Florida Design Manual and Traffic Engineering Manual, as well as other manuals, to be implemented systemically on other state roads. The HSIP includes the first projects designed using the updated FDM. Manual on Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE): This manual was revised in November 2017. Intersections play an essential role in the roadway network and account for a high percentage of all crashes, especially severe crashes producing fatalities and serious injuries. This manual update incorporates changes to reflect the FDOT Complete Streets policy, building in flexibility and innovation to ensure roads are developed based on context. The manual includes guidance for alternative intersections, using roundabouts, cross-over-based designs, and U- turn-based designs. The Manual on ICE was used to design the HSIP. Connected and Automated Vehicles: In 2018, FDOT increased its efforts to research and deliver connected vehicle technology to reduce traffic crashes and published its first Connected and Automated Vehicles Business Plan in January 2019. FDOT has already implemented several pilot projects focused on transportation system management and operations TSM&O to test emerging technologies that could improve safety and efficiency and documented those efforts in this plan. Highway Safety Manual (HSM): FDOT recognizes the importance of the national HSM. Through dedicated and consistent training and messaging over the last several years, the HSM is now an integral part of FDOT project development and design. The HSM was used for HSIP projects. Florida Safe Routes to School (SRTS): Florida SRTS is a statewide program that is funded by FDOT. Its goal is to make it safer for more children to walk and bicycle to school. Florida SRTS funds projects that address unsafe or lack of infrastructure, as well as programs that promote walking and bicycling through education/encouragement programs aimed at children, parents, and the community. FDOT transferred HSIP funds during the state fiscal year 2019/2020 to enhance safety for school crossing zones through the SRTS program and to enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety through Florida’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Coalition. Safe Transportation for Every Pedestrian (STEP): The STEP training workshop from FHWA is focused on the systemic application of cost-effective countermeasures with known safety benefits to reduce pedestrian fatalities at both uncontrolled and signalized crossing locations. In addition, the training workshop includes a crosswalk of laws including the 2018 Florida Statutes Title XXIII Chapter 316 and countermeasures to improve pedestrian safety. The STEP training workshop also includes case studies and group exercises related to the countermeasures and their application. By focusing on pedestrian crossing locations, agencies can address a significant national safety problem and boost the quality of life for pedestrians of all ages and abilities. Florida Community Traffic Safety Teams Florida’s Community Traffic Safety Teams (CTSTs) also provide consistent input into the highway safety planning process. CTSTs are locally based groups of highway safety advocates that are committed to solving traffic safety problems through a comprehensive, multi-jurisdictional, multi-disciplinary approach. Members include city, county, state, and occasionally federal agencies, as well as private industry representatives and local citizens. Community 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 24 boundaries are determined by the organizations comprising a CTST: a city, an entire county, a portion of a county, multiple counties, or some other jurisdictional arrangement may be the basis for a CTST. Tracking Progress Under 23 CFR Part 490, each state is required to establish annual safety performance targets for five measures:  number of fatalities;  number of serious injuries;  fatality rate (per hundred million vehicle miles traveled (100M VMT));  serious injury rate (per 100M VMT); and  number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries. Figures 7 through 11 show Florida data for 2005 through 2018 for each of these five measures. Florida made progress in 2017 in reducing the numbers or the rate associated with ALL FIVE safety performance targets and while there was a slight increase in fatalities in 2018, numbers remain below the 2016 peak. Florida develops safety data forecasts for each of the five safety performance measures annually and uses these forecasts to project and monitor the state’s progress toward achieving the goal of zero transportation fatalities and serious injuries. These forecasts included an exploratory analysis, a pre-forecast validation process, and forecasts for 2020 and 2021. Initial findings of this forecasting indicate that fatalities (5-year rolling average) and non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries (5-year rolling average) will increase while fatality rate (5-year rolling average) will remain constant. The forecast suggests serious injuries (5-year rolling average) and serious injury rate (5-year rolling average) will decrease in 2020 and 2021. As shown in Figure 7, Florida reversed a trend of over 3,000 fatalities annually from 2008 to 2015 but climbed to 3,163 in 2016. Due to recent efforts by FDOT and its many partners, fatalities in 2017 dropped to 3,116 and saw only a slight increase to 3,135 in 2018 despite substantial increases in VMT and population. Serious injuries have fallen dramatically to 19,196 in 2018 which is the lowest number of serious injuries since 2005 when 29,310 serious injuries were reported (Figure 8). FHWA asks that states analyze safety performance targets using five-year rolling averages to support the forecasting of long-term trends. This methodology calculates the average number of fatalities occurring over a five-year period, considering data from 2010-2014 to report the performance metric for 2014, for example. Because of Florida’s lower number of fatalities between 2010 and 2014, the five-year rolling average indicates an upward trend while the actual number of fatalities reflect a plateau between 3,100 and 3,200 fatalities beginning in 2016. Florida’s serious injuries, however, demonstrate a slow and steady decline using both the actual numbers and five-year rolling averages. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 25 Figure 8 . Roadway Fatalities, 2005-2018 Figure 9 . Roadway Serious Injuries, 2005-2018 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 26 Fatality rate and serious injury rate are calculated by dividing the total number of fatalities or serious injuries that occur in a given year by the total VMT. Florida’s fatality rate declined from 1.48 people killed on the state’s roadways per 100 million VMT in 2016 to 1.41 people killed per 100 million VMT in 2018 (Figure 9). Florida’s serious injury rate also declined from 10.06 people seriously injured per 100 million VMT in 2016 to 8.65 people seriously injured in 2018 (Figure 10). Florida’s non-motorized users are among the state’s most vulnerable road users. In 2016, there were 3,292 non- motorized fatalities and serious injuries (combined). Since then, the number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries (combined) increased to 3,319 in 2018 (Figure 11). Figure 10. Roadway Fatality Rate per 100M VMT, 2005-2018 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 27 Figure 11. Roadway Serious Injury Rate per 100M VMT, 2005-2018 Figure 12. Non-motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries, 2005-2018 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety Highway Safety Improvement Program Implementation Plan 28 FDOT administers programs for lane departure, intersections, and non-motorists (i.e. bicyclists and pedestrians) under the HSIP. These programs are tracked and reported in the annual HSIP report to FHWA. FDOT also administers programs for impaired driving, occupant protection, motorcycle safety, distracted driving, speed/aggressive driving, teen drivers, pedestrians/bicyclists, aging road users, work zone safety, and traffic records and data management through the HSP. The HSP Annual Report to NHTSA provides details on how the state will adjust its upcoming HSP to make significant progress toward achieving safety targets required under section 2e 23 U.S.C. 1300.35(a). These two programs, along with the additional actions identified above, are designed to continue to drive down fatalities with an ultimate goal of zero fatalities and serious injuries on Florida’s roadways. FDOT will conduct an analysis of the various strategic safety coalition action plan outcomes and HSIP annual report to determine progress. 9.G.1 Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: FDOT Draft HSIP Implementation Plan (14175 : Adopt Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Vision Zero Safety 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) OBJECTIVE: For the Board to receive a presentation on the draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). CONSIDERATIONS: The MPO’s consulting team, Jacobs Engineering, will give a brief presentation covering the latest updates to the draft 2045 LRTP and work still in progress. Jacobs has made revisions to Chapters 1-6 based on comments received to-date. New chapters on Implementation and References have been added, along with the Appendices. The MPO advisory committees will conduct final reviews of the draft 2045 LRTP in November. The final draft will be brought to the Board for adoption in December. The draft LRTP is shown in Attachment 1. The draft Appendices are shown in Attachment 2. The presentation is shown in Attachment 3. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board review and comment on the draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (PDF) 2. 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (PDF) 3. PPT Presentation on Draft 2045 LRTP (PDF) 10.A Packet Pg. 785 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 10.A Doc ID: 14179 Item Summary: Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/05/2020 12:37 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/05/2020 12:37 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/05/2020 12:45 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/05/2020 12:50 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 10.A Packet Pg. 786 DECEMBER 2020 COLLIER MPO LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Draft 10-16-20 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Prepared for Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Collier County Growth Management Department 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-5814 Email: colliermpo@colliergov.net Prepared by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd, Suite 505 Naples, Florida 34108 United States T +1.239.431.9231 T +1.239.431.9231 www.jacobs.com Photography Credits Bill Gramer Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Nathan Lunsford Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Adam Ahmad Capital Consulting Solutions 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan i Contents Contents Introduction 1‐1 What Is the MPO? ........... 1‐1 1‐2 What Is the Long Range Transportation Plan? ................................ 1‐6 1‐3 Federal and State Planning Requirements .................. 1‐8 1‐4 Regional Transportation Planning ......................... 1‐11 Plan Process 2‐1 Plan Process ..................... 2‐1 2‐2 County Overview ............. 2‐2 2‐3 Forecasting Growth ......... 2‐5 2‐4 Public Participation ........ 2‐12 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives 3‐1 Long Range Vision for Collier County Transportation .... 3‐1 3‐2 2045 LRTP Goals .............. 3‐3 3‐3 Applying Priorities to Decision‐Making ............ 3‐11 2045 Needs Plan 4‐1 Needs Plan Overview ......................... 4‐1 4‐2 Roadway Needs ............... 4‐4 4‐3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs .......... 4‐41 4‐4 Transit Needs ................ 4‐47 4‐5 Air Transportation Needs ............................. 4‐57 1 2 3 4 Executive Summary 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan ii Contents Financial Resources 5‐1 Overview .......................... 5‐1 5‐2 Roadway and Transit Revenue Projections ....... 5‐2 5‐3 Roadway and Transit Federal/State Funding .... 5‐2 5‐4 Local Revenue Projections and Sources .................... 5‐5 5‐5 Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Sources .............. 5‐5 5‐5 Airport Funding ................ 5‐7 Cost Feasible Plan 6‐1 Roadway Cost Feasible Projects ............................ 6‐1 6‐2 Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects .......................... 6‐14 6‐3 Transit Cost Feasible Projects .......................... 6‐17 6‐4 Freight Network Projects .......................... 6‐23 6‐5 Airport Transportation Projects .......................... 6‐23 Implementation 7‐1 Implementation Framework ...................... 7‐1 7‐2 Planning Programs .......... 7‐3 References 8‐1 References ....................... 8‐1 7 5 8 6 Appendices (Provided Under Separate Cover) • Appendix A Federal and State LRTP Requirements • Appendix B Collier County Traffic Analysis Zones • Appendix C 2045 Map Series • Appendix D Collier MPO FY 2021–FY 2025 TIP • Appendix E Roadway Needs Evaluation Matrix • Appendix F Collier 2020 System Performance Report 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan iii Contents Tables Table 2-1. 2015 and 2045 Socioeconomic Data ................................. 2-7 Table 2-2. Public Participation Events .............................................. 2-13 Table 3-1. 2045 LRTP Evaluation Criteria and Performance Measures ................................................... 3-12 Table 4-1. 2045 Existing Plus Committed (E+C) Projects ................... 4-8 Table 4-2. East of CR 951 Bridge Reevaluation Study Bridges ......... 4-13 Table 4-3. TSPR Top Road Segment Crash Locations (2014–2018) .................................................................... 4-19 Table 4-4. Mitigation Strategies ....................................................... 4-24 Table 4-5. Potential Positive and Negative Effects Resulting from ACES Technologies .......................................................... 4-28 Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects ..................................... 4-31 Table 4-7. Network Gaps/Facility Needs .......................................... 4-43 Table 4-8. Complete Streets – Safety Corridor Studies ................... 4-44 Table 4-9. Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities .................... 4-45 Table 4-10. Ridership and Growth Rates with No Improvements, 2021–2030a ..................................................................... 4-50 Table 4-11. Transit Needs Evaluation Measures .............................. 4-51 Table 4-12. 2045 Transit Needs Summary ....................................... 4-52 Table 5-1. 2045 LRTP Revenue Projections ........................................ 5-3 Table 5-2. Federal and State Revenue Projections (YOE) .................. 5-4 Table 6-1. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP SIS Cost Feasible Plan Projects .... 6-2 Table 6-2. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Projects – FDOT Other Roads Projects and Local Roadway Projects .............................................................. 6-4 Table 6-3. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Projects – Partially Funded Projects (FY2026–FY2045) ...................... 6-8 Table 6-4. Congestion Management Projects Funded in TIP ........... 6-11 Table 6-5. Infrastructure Strategies Matrix ...................................... 6-12 Table 6-6. Non-Infrastructure Strategies Matrix .............................. 6-13 Table 6-7. Collier County 2045 LRTP - Unfunded Needs Projects .... 6-15 Table 6-8. Costs of Priority Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects by Mileage Totals............................................................. 6-17 Table 6-9. 2045 Transit Cost Feasible Summary .............................. 6-18 Table 7-1. Collier MPO Adopted Performance Measures and Targets ............................................................................... 7-2 Table 7-2. LRTP Goals and Federal Planning Factors .......................... 7-4 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan iv Contents Figures Figure 1-1. Collier MPO Board ........................................................ 1-1 Figure 1-2. Collier MPO Jurisdiction ................................................ 1-2 Figure 1-3. Technical Advisory Committee .................................... 1-3 Figure 1-4. Citizens Advisory Committee ....................................... 1-3 Figure 1-5. Congestion Management Committee ......................... 1-4 Figure 1-6. Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged .............................................................. 1-5 Figure 1-7. 2045 LRTP Development and Guidance ....................... 1-7 Figure 1-8. FAST Act Planning Factors ............................................. 1-8 Figure 1-9. Daily Collier County Work Travel Patterns ................. 1-12 Figure 1-10. Collier MPO Documentation Responsibilities ........... 1-13 Figure 2-1. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Key Process Steps ................... 2-1 Figure 2-2. Plan Process ................................................................. 2-2 Figure 2-3. Collier County Planning Communities, Points of Interest, and Unincorporated Communities ................ 2-4 Figure 2-4. Dwelling Unit Growth Areas ....................................... 2-8 Figure 2-5. Commercial Square Footage Growth Areas ................. 2-9 Figure 2-6. FDOT-Approved Travel Demand Models ................... 2-10 Figure 3-1. Federal Planning Factors ............................................... 3-1 Figure 3-2. LRTP Development Framework .................................... 3-4 Figure 4-1. FDOT Context Classifications ........................................ 4-3 Figure 4-2. 2045 Existing Plus Committed (E+C) Project Map ........ 4-7 Figure 4-3. 2045 E+C Travel Network Congestion Map ................ 4-11 Figure 4-4. Freight Network and Activity Centers ......................... 4-15 Figure 4-5. Congestion Management Process Eight-Step Framework .................................................................. 4-16 Figure 4-6. TSPR Congestion Hot Spot Locations .......................... 4-17 Figure 4-7. 2019 and 2020 CMP ITS/Active Roadway Management Projects ...................................................... 4-22 Figure 4-8. Resiliency Planning Considerations ................................. 4-25 Figure 4-9. USACE Collier County Coastal Storm Risk Management Feasibility Study Planning Reaches .................................. 4-26 Figure 4-10. SAE Automation Levels .................................................. 4-29 Figure 4-11. 2045 Needs Plan Project Map ....................................... 4-30 Figure 4-12. Transit Network Service Needs ...................................... 4-56 Figure 5-1. Planning Periods Summary (Revenue Bands) .................... 5-1 Figure 6-1. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP SIS Cost Feasible Plan Projects ..... 6-3 Figure 6-2. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map (FY2026–FY2030) ........... 6-5 Figure 6-3. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map (FY2031–FY2035) ........... 6-6 Figure 6-4. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map (FY2036–FY2045) ........... 6-7 Figure 6-5. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map – Partially Funded (FY2026–FY2045) .................................... 6-9 Figure 6-6. Total Costs by Project Phase for FDOT Other Roads and Local Roads Funded Projects 2026–2045 ................. 6-10 Figure 6-7. Total Costs by Funding Source 2026–2045 ...................... 6-10 Figure 6-8. 2045 Transit Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map ................. 6-22 Figure 6-9. Freight Hotspot Locations ................................................ 6-23 Figure 7-1. Collier MPO Plans and Programs Timeline ....................... 7-5 Figure 7-2. M-CORES Study Area ........................................................ 7-8 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan v Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic ACES Automated, Connected, Electric and Shared-Use ACS American Community Survey ADA Americans with Disabilities Act AMPO Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations ATCS Adaptive Traffic Control System AUIR Annual Update and Inventory Report BCC Board of County Commission (Collier County) BEBR Bureau of Economic and Business Research BPAC Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee BPMP Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan BRT bus rapid transit CAC Citizens Advisory Committee CAT Collier Area Transit CAV Connected and Autonomous Vehicles CCGMP Collier County Growth Management Plan CFR Code of Federal Regulations CIGM Collier Interactive Growth Model CMC Congestion Management Committee CMP Congestion Management Process CMS Congestion Management System CR county road CRA community redevelopment area CST construction CTC Community Transportation Coordinator DTA Density Threshold Assessment E+C existing plus committed EJ environmental justice ETDM Efficient Transportation Decision Making F.S. Florida Statutes FAA Federal Aviation Authority FAC freight activity center FAST Fixing America’s Surface Transportation FDEP Florida Department of Environmental Protection FDOT Florida Department of Transportation FHWA Federal Highway Administration FMTP Freight Mobility and Trade Plan FPN Financial Project Number FRAME Florida’s Regional Advanced Mobility Elements FTA Federal Transit Administration FY fiscal year(s) HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program ITS Intelligent Transportation System LCB Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged LOS level of service LRTP Long Range Transportation Plan MCORES Multi-use Corridors of Regional Economic Significance MOD Mobility-On-Demand MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization MPOAC Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council NHS National Highway System NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NPC Naples Pathway Coalition O&M operations and maintenance PD&E Project Development and Environment PE preliminary engineering/design PHU Panther Habitat Unit PIP Public Involvement Plan PM performance measure PPP Public Participation Plan ROW right-of-way RTP Recreational Trails Program SHS State Highway System SIS Strategic Intermodal System SLR sea level rise SPR System Performance Report 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan vi Contents STBG Surface Transportation Block Grant TAC Technical Advisory Committee TAZ Traffic Analysis Zone T-BEST Transit Boarding Estimation and Simulation Tool TCMA Transportation Concurrency Management Area TDP Transit Development Plan TIP Transportation Improvement Program TMA Transportation Management Area TOC Traffic Operations/Management Center TOI Transit Orientation Index TRIP Transportation Regional Incentive Program TSA transit service area TSM&O Transportation System Management and Operations TSPR Transportation System Performance Report ULB Useful Life Benchmark UPWP Unified Planning Work Programs USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USC U.S. Code V/C volume to capacity VMT vehicle miles traveled YOE year of expenditure 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Executive SummaryES 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan ES-1 Executive Summary Executive Summary To be provided 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Introduction 1-1 What Is the MPO? 1-2 What Is the Long Range Transportation Plan? 1-3 Federal and State Planning Requirements 1-4 Regional Transportation Planning 1 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1-1 Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 1 Introduction 1-1 What Is the MPO? The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) was created in 1982 following Title 23 of United States Code Section 134 (23 USC §134) Metropolitan Transportation Planning federal requirements that each urbanized area with a population exceeding 50,000 establish an MPO. Federal law requires that MPOs be governed by a board composed of local elected officials, governmental transportation representatives for all modes of transportation, and appropriate state officials. The Collier MPO is governed by a board of nine voting members and one non‐voting advisor from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), as shown on Figure 1-1. The Collier MPO’s jurisdiction includes Collier County (hereafter, “the County”) and the cities of Naples, Marco Island, and Everglades City (refer to Figure 1-2). The MPO uses federal, state, and local funds to carry out a Continuing, Cooperative, and Comprehensive long‐range planning process that establishes a county‐wide vision for the transportation system. The Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) is a central part of achieving this vision. MPOs are required to develop and update their LRTPs on a 5‐year cycle to ensure that the future transportation system is efficient, fosters mobility and access for people and goods, and enhances the overall quality of life for the community. To carry out its functions, the MPO Board is assisted by several transportation planning committees in addition to its professional staff. These committees consist of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), Congestion Management Committee (CMC), and the Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged (LCB). Figure 1-1. Collier MPO Board 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1-2 Chapter 1 Introduction Technical Advisory Committee: The TAC consists of tech‐ nically qualified representatives of agencies within the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Area. TAC members are responsible for planning, maintaining, operating, developing, and improving the transportation system throughout the County and its associated municipalities. They review transportation plans and programs from a technical perspective. There are 13 voting members and one non‐voting member (refer to Figure 1-3). Figure 1-2. Collier MPO Jurisdiction Source: Collier MPO Transportation Improvement Plan FY2021‐FY2025 (Collier MPO 2020) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1-3 Chapter 1 Introduction Figure 1-3. Technical Advisory Committee Citizens Advisory Committee: The CAC consists of citizens representing a cross section of the geographic areas and citizens representing disabled and minority populations. They are recruited to represent the cities of Naples, Marco Island, and Everglades City, and the county commission districts of the unincorporated areas of the County. These individuals make recommendations to the MPO Board from the citizen’s perspective on proposed LRTPs, individual projects, priorities for state and federal funding, and other transportation issues. The CAC has 13 voting members, including four at‐large members (refer to Figure 1-4). Figure 1-4. Citizens Advisory Committee 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1-4 Chapter 1 Introduction Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee: Formerly known as the Pathways Advisory Committee, the BPAC consists of 12 at‐large voting members who represent a wide cross section of the Collier Metropolitan Area residents and neighborhoods, bicycle and pedestrian safety professionals, transit riders, local bicycle and pedestrian advocacy groups, organizations that encourage active transportation from a community health perspective, and advocates for persons with disabilities and other transportation‐disadvantaged populations. The BPAC provides citizen input into the deliberations on bicycle‐ and pedestrian‐related issues within the community and advises the MPO Board on developing a Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The BPAC is also involved in recommending priorities for bicycle and pedestrian projects and program implementation. Congestion Management Committee: The CMC serves the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters relating to the MPO’s Congestion Management System (CMS) and the regional Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) architecture. The committee is responsible for creating and amending the Congestion Management Process (CMP) and for prioritizing candidate congestion management projects to be funded with federal and state funding. The CMC has 11 voting members and 15 non‐voting members (refer to Figure 1-5). All members are appointed by agencies/jurisdictional departments. Figure 1-5. Congestion Management Committee 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1-5 Chapter 1 Introduction Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged: The LCB helps the MPO identify local service needs and provide information, advice, and direction to the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) on the coordination of services to be provided to the transportation disadvantaged pursuant to Chapter 427.0157, Florida Statutes (F.S.). The LCB includes representatives from various state and local agencies as well as citizen representatives (refer to Figure 1-6). A Collier County elected official is appointed to serve as chairperson. The LCB also reviews the amount and quality of transit service being provided to the County’s transportation‐disadvantaged population. The Collier LCB meets each quarter and holds at least one public hearing a year. The purpose of the hearings is to provide input to the LCB on unmet transportation needs or any other areas relating to local transportation disadvantaged services. Figure 1-6. Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1-6 Chapter 1 Introduction 1-2 What Is the Long Range Transportation Plan? The MPO is required to complete an LRTP to receive federal funds. The LRTP must be multimodal and should include, at a minimum, highway and transit infrastructure improvements. The Collier MPO LRTP includes highway (incorporating freight) and transit modes, and by reference, non‐motorized modes. The LRTP covers a broad range of issues including environ‐ mental impact, economic development, mobility, safety, security, and quality of life. Chapter 2 provides a more detailed examination of federal compliance. To comply with federal requirements, the LRTP is produced or updated every 5 years and must maintain a minimum time horizon of 20 years. The previous 2040 LRTP update was adopted in December 11, 2015 (Tindale Oliver 2015). The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update began in March 2019. As described in Chapter 3, the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP was developed to ensure consistency with all applicable state and federal requirements guiding the LRTP process. The primary purpose of the 2045 LRTP update is to help citizens, businesses, and elected officials collaborate on developing a multimodal and sustainable transportation system that addresses projected growth over the next 20 years. The 2045 LRTP update serves as an instrument to identify needed improvements to the transportation network and provides a long‐term investment framework that addresses current and future transportation challenges. During the development of the 2045 LRTP, the MPO engaged its standing committees, particularly the TAC and CAC, who reviewed and commented on every aspect of the LRTP. Both committees held a series of monthly meetings through the summer of 2020 to assist the MPO on the Needs and Cost Feasible Plans. The CMC, BPAC, and the LCB also helped to the guide the development of the LRTP by providing their exper‐ tise on the development of their committee’s corresponding transportation plans. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1-7 Chapter 1 Introduction As shown on Figure 1-7, the CMC contributed to the Transportation System Performance Report and Action Plan (2020), which addresses congestion; the BPAC contributed to the Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan (2019), which is incorporated into the bicycle and pedestrian section of the LRTP; and Collier County’s Public Transit Advisory Committee contributed to the Transit Development Plan Major Update (2020), which is incorporated in the transit section of the LRTP. Further, the MPO’s informal Adviser Network (400‐plus members) of community, business, and environmental groups provided essential public input through a series of small group and one‐on‐one interviews. Additional public input was gained by conducting outreach to traditionally underserved com‐ munities, virtual public meetings, and surveys. Because of the COVID‐19 pandemic that occurred during the 2045 LRTP update, traditional meetings planned for the update were switched to virtual platforms. Figure 1-7. 2045 LRTP Development and Guidance 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1-8 Chapter 1 Introduction 1-3 Federal and State Planning Requirements Federal In December 2015, the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act was signed into law and built on the program structure and reforms of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP‐21), which was signed into law in 2012. The FAST Act includes provisions to enhance and support the improved transportation planning factors outlined in MAP‐21. Under the FAST Act, two additional planning factors were added: • improve the resilience and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts on surface transportation • enhance travel and tourism Under the FAST Act, several planning factors are required for long‐range transportation planning as shown on Figure 1-8. In addition to the FAST Act planning factors, MAP‐21 included transitioning to a performance‐based program, including establishing national performance goals for federal aid highway programs. The FAST Act continued this overall performance management approach, requiring state DOTs and MPOs to conduct performance‐based planning by tracking performance measures and setting data‐driven targets to improve those measures. Figure 1-8. FAST Act Planning Factors 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1-9 Chapter 1 Introduction Performance‐based planning ensures the most efficient investment of federal transportation funds by increasing accountability, transparency, and providing for better investment decisions that focus on key outcomes related to the following seven national goals, which include: • Safety ‐ To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads • Infrastructure Condition ‐ To maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state of good repair • Congestion Reduction ‐ To achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National Highway System (NHS) • System Reliability ‐ To improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system • Freight Movement and Economic Vitality ‐ To improve the national freight network, strengthen the ability of rural communities to access national and international trade markets, and support regional economic development • Environmental Sustainability ‐ To enhance the performance of the transportation system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment • Reduced Project Delivery Delays ‐ To reduce project costs, promote jobs and the economy, and expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating project completion through eliminating delays in the project development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies' work practices The FAST Act supplemented the MAP‐21 legislation by establishing timelines for state DOTs and MPOs to comply with the requirements of MAP‐21. State DOTs are required to establish statewide targets and MPOs have the option to support the statewide targets or adopt their own. The Collier MPO has chosen to support the statewide targets. The transition to performance‐based planning is ongoing and has been addressed within the tasks identified in this LRTP. For the County and its municipalities to be eligible for federal and state funds, the MPO must adopt and maintain a transportation plan covering at least 20 years (the LRTP), and a 5‐year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which is a fiscally constrained, multimodal program of transportation projects within the Collier Metropolitan Planning Area. The TIP is updated each year and includes highway, bridge, bicycle and pedestrian facilities; transit; congestion management; road and bridge maintenance; transportation planning; and transportation‐disadvantaged projects. Both the LRTP and the TIP are required by federal and state law. The TIP identifies, prioritizes, and allocates funding for transportation projects. Projects in the TIP are included in the existing‐plus‐committed (E+C) component of the MPO’s LRTP. Development of the TIP is a continuous process involving agency staff and public involvement. The adopted TIP and potential TIP project priorities must be consistent with the LRTP. MPOs are governed by federal law (23 USC §134), with regulations included in Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 450 (23 CFR 450). When MPOs were mandated in 1962, federal laws required metropolitan transportation plans and programs be developed through a 3‐C planning process. The law intended for MPOs to serve as a forum for collaborative transportation decision‐making. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1-10 Chapter 1 Introduction Further, planning is to be conducted continually using a cooperative process with state and local officials and public transportation agencies operating within the MPO’s boundaries. Because the Collier MPO serves a population of more than 200,000, it meets the federal definition of a Transportation Management Area (TMA) and, therefore, must meet additional federal conditions including the establishment of a CMP. The CMP identifies challenges and solutions to reduce congestion and improve traffic flow along arterial roadways. The CMP is also used as a tool to help identify projects in the TIP and LRTP. As stated previously, the Collier MPO CMC is responsible for creating and amending the CMP. The LRTP must include a financial plan to ensure that reliable and reasonable funding sources are identified to implement the LRTP. The cost of projects listed in the LRTP must balance financially with the revenues from funding sources forecasted to be reasonably available over the duration of the LRTP. Chapter 3 provides a more detailed account of federal and state financial requirements for the LRTP. The Public Participation Plan (PPP) provides a framework to the public involvement process regarding the MPO planning‐ related activities. The PPP describes the MPO’s strategies and techniques to inform and engage the public in transportation planning issues to maximize public involvement and effective‐ ness. PPPs are living documents that should be updated once every 5 years, preferably prior to the initiation of the development of a new LRTP update. In addition to the PPP, each MPO should develop an LRTP‐specific PPP or Public Involvement Plan (PIP). The PIP builds off of the content and assumptions within the approved PPP but provides additional information, such as specific stakeholders to be engaged during the LRTP development, a summary of proposed engagement activities throughout the LRTP development, and an engagement milestone schedule. A PIP was developed for the 2045 LRTP Update and is further discussed in Chapter 3. In January 2018, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) issued the Federal Strategies for Implementing Requirements for LRTP Updates for the Florida MPOs to the FDOT and the MPOs in Florida (FHWA and FTA 2018). The guidance, commonly referred to as FHWA’s Expectations Letter, outlines the agencies’ expectations for the development of LRTP updates to assist MPOs in meeting the federal planning requirements. In July 2020, FDOT issued a notice that FHWA expected MPOs to also address previous FHWA Expectation Letters from December 4, 2008 (FHWA’s Strategies for Implementing Requirements for LRTP Update for the Florida MPOs) and November 2012 (Federal Strategies for Implementing Requirements for LRTP Update for the Florida MPOs). The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update’s adherence to the 2018, 2012, and 2008 FHWA’s Expectations Letters is summarized in Appendix A. State The FDOT Office of Policy Planning develops Planning Emphasis Areas on a 2‐year cycle in coordination with the development of the MPOs’ respective Unified Planning Work Programs (UPWPs). The emphasis areas set planning priorities, and MPOs are encouraged to address these topics as they develop their planning programs. The 2020 FDOT Florida Planning Emphasis Areas are: • Safety. MPOs are encouraged to consider how to expand on the level of analysis and reporting required by the 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1-11 Chapter 1 Introduction performance measurement process to further study their unique safety challenges. • System Connectivity. MPOs should emphasize connectivity within their boundaries to serve the unique needs of their urban and non‐urban jurisdictions beyond their boundaries to emphasize continuity on those facilities that link their MPO to other metropolitan and non‐urban areas, and include multimodal linkages that support connectivity for people and freight. • Resilience. MPOs can address resilience within their planning processes by leveraging tools, such as the FHWA (2017) Resilience and Transportation Planning guide and the FDOT Quick Guide: Incorporating Resilience in the MPO LRTP (FDOT 2020a). MPOs should consider the additional costs associated with reducing vulnerability of the existing transportation infrastructure to help develop a more realistic and cost‐effective planning document. • ACES (Automated/Connected/Electric/Shared-use) Vehicles. Increased deployment of ACES vehicles with enabling policies and supportive infrastructure may lead to great improvements in safety, transportation choices, and quality of life for Floridians, visitors, and the Florida economy. Though there is a great deal of speculation and uncertainty of the potential impacts these technologies will have, MPOs are to determine how best to address the challenges and opportunities presented to them by ACES vehicles. Additionally, with the intent to encourage and promote the safe and efficient management, operation, and development of surface transportation systems, the Florida legislature enacted Section 339.175(6)(b), F.S., which requires the LRTP to provide for consideration of projects and strategies that will: • Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency • Increase the safety and security of the transportation system for motorized and non‐motorized users • Increase the accessibility and mobility options available to people and for freight • Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, and improve quality of life • Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight • Promote efficient system management and operation • Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system In addition to adhering to these requirements, other statutory requirements set forth by the state of Florida regarding the development of a LRTP are presented in Appendix A. 1-4 Regional Transportation Planning The Collier County Metropolitan Area highways are part of a regional network that not only connects different parts of the County and its municipalities, but also links the County and its municipalities to neighboring counties in the region, to the state, and to the nation. As illustrated on Figure 1-9, business travel between Collier County and its neighbors is significant, especially between Collier County and Lee County. From 2011 to 2015, the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1-12 Chapter 1 Introduction Survey (ACS) analysis of commuting patterns reported approximately 30,400 daily inter‐county auto‐oriented trips between Collier and Lee counties. Figure 1-9. Daily Collier County Work Travel Patterns The Collier MPO provides for the creation of a region‐wide multimodal transportation planning process in accordance with federal and state guidelines to ensure the coordination of transportation planning and policy activities in FDOT District One. The Collier MPO performs the following regional transportation planning activities: • Participates in the Lee County MPO and advisory committee meetings. • Participates and coordinates in the Joint MPO Board and Joint Advisory Committee meetings with Lee County MPO. • Coordinates with FDOT, Lee County MPO, other adjoining MPOs and adjoining jurisdictions, municipalities, or agencies to ensure that regional needs are being addressed and planning activities are consistent. Such coordination includes, but is not limited to, discussion of regional plans, review of the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) plan, evaluation and ranking of Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) projects, and update of joint priorities for regional and statewide funding. • Develops, adopts, and updates regional transportation priorities, including the Regional Transportation Network Priorities (which includes the SIS and other important cross‐county connections and intermodal facilities), the TRIP projects, and Regional Enhancement Priorities. • Participates in the (national) Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO), Florida Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC), and FDOT District One Coordinated Urban Transportation Studies (CUTS), FDOT/FHWA quarterly conference calls and regional quarterly meetings. • Analyzes state and federal laws and regulations for MPOs, committees, and local government officials to aid them in their application of regional transportation policy strategies. • Participate in the Multi‐use Corridors of Regional Economic Significance (M‐CORES) Southwest‐Central Florida Corridor Task Force meetings. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1-13 Chapter 1 Introduction Further, as shown on Figure 1-10, the Collier MPO under state and federal laws is required produce documents that support region‐wide transportation planning which include the LRTP, TIP, UPWP, and PPP. The PPP provides a framework for public involvement in regard to all MPO planning‐related activities. Figure 1-10. Collier MPO Documentation Responsibilities 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Process 2-1 Plan Process 2-2 County Overview 2-3 Forecasting Growth 2-4 Public Participation 2 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-1 Chapter 2 Plan Process Chapter 2 Plan Process 2-1 Plan Process This chapter discusses the staged process to develop the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update and describes the plan development activities resulting from public involvement. Goals and Objectives, the Needs Assessment, and the Cost Feasible Plan outlined in this chapter are described in detail in Chapters 3, 4, and 6, respectively. Updating the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP was a technical, collaborative process that included participation by the MPO Board members, virtual public workshops and public surveys, briefings to the various MPO advisory committees (described in Chapter 1), and advisory meetings with the TAC and CAC. As illustrated on Figure 2-1 and Figure 2-2, five key steps were involved in the LRTP development process. The MPO Board’s adoption of the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP acknowledged these five steps, with input from the public, the MPO committees, and MPO Board, resulting in a financially constrained plan of transportation improvements. The five stages of the plan process were built upon past planning efforts, a technical review of forecast socioeconomic growth, the financial outlook of the County, and input from County residents and elected officials. Figure 2-1. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Key Process Steps 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-2 Chapter 2 Plan Process Figure 2-2. Plan Process 2-2 County Overview Collier County is the largest county in Florida by land area. Approximately 67 percent of the County’s land area has a land use designation of Conservation, is owned primarily by the federal and state government, and is restricted from develop- ment. According to the Florida Legislature Office of Economic and Demographic Research (EDR 2020), the County had an estimated population of 376,706 in 2019. Of the 67 total counties in the state, Collier County is the 16th most populous county in Florida with 1.8 percent of the state’s population. U.S. Census population data show that Collier County population increased by 53 percent between 1990 and 2010. The state of Florida population increased by 31 percent during the same time. Between 2010 and 2019, the Florida Legislature Office of Economic and Demographic Research data show the population in the County further increased by approximately 17 percent, while the state’s population increased by approximately 13 percent. As noted earlier, there are three municipalities located within Collier County: the cities of Naples and Marco Island and Everglades City. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-3 Chapter 2 Plan Process City of Naples The City of Naples is the largest in population of the three municipalities within the County. As of 2018, the full-time residential population was 22,000 with a potential seasonal population of more than 33,000 in the winter months (City of Naples 2020). The City has a council-manager form of government that is comprised of a mayor and six council members, all of whom are elected City-wide on a non-partisan basis. The City’s Planning Advisory Board guided a community- wide assessment of the City Vision documented in the Vision 2020 Analysis and Recommendations report (City of Naples 2019). Through the public outreach process during the assessment, five Vision Goals for the City were identified: • Preserve Naples’ Small Town Character and Culture • Environmental Sensitivity • Maintain an Extraordinary Quality of Life for Residents • Maintain and Strengthen the Economic Health and Vitality of the City City of Marco Island The City of Marco Island is located on the largest barrier island of the chain of islands off the southwest Florida coast known as the Ten Thousand Islands. According to the U.S. Census, the 2019 population estimate is almost 18,000. The City estimates the potential seasonal population as more than 40,000 in the winter months. The City has a council-manager form of government with seven council members. According to the City website, more than 1,700 vacant lots remain on the island and new homes are constructed at a rate of 200 to 300 a year (City of Marco Island 2020). The City’s Future Land Use Element goal is To enhance Marco Island’s quality of life, environmental quality, and tropical small town and resort character by managing growth and assuring a stable residential community with sufficient businesses to serve the needs of residents and visitors. Everglades City Everglades City is the smallest in population and land size of the three municipalities in Collier County. According to the U.S. Census, the 2019 year-round population estimate of the City is more than 400. The City has a council-manager form of government that is comprised of a mayor and five council members, all of whom are elected City-wide on a non-partisan basis. The City is surrounded by seven national and state parks including the Everglades National Park Gulf Coast Visitor Center, which is located within the City limits. The City estimates that 1 to 1.3 million people visit annually (City of Everglades City 2019). The City has a strong ecotourism industry and seeks to preserve its small town character. In January 2019, the City was designated as an official Trail Town by Florida’s Office of Greenways and Trails. As shown on Figure 2-3, three municipalities and 12 planning communities lie within the County (Collier County 2020a). With the absence of a designated urban service area or an urban growth boundary, the Collier County Growth Management Plan (CCGMP) includes two primary designations within the Future Land Use Map: Urban and Rural/ Agricultural. All lands within the County geography fall into one of these two categories, which help shape or control the pattern of urban development and land use controls. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-4 Chapter 2 Plan Process Figure 2-3. Collier County Planning Communities, Points of Interest, and Unincorporated Communities Source: Collier County (2020) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-5 Chapter 2 Plan Process Eight of the planning communities have land use designations of Urban as follows: • North Naples • Central Naples • East Naples • South Naples • Golden Gate • Marco • Urban Estates • Immokalee The remaining four are designated as Rural: • Royal Fakapalm • Big Cypress • Rural Estates • Corkscrew While growth is expected to continue in urban planning communities, many of them are approaching build-out, causing development to spread to rural planning communities. The Urban designation promotes a diversity of urban development and a wide variety of land uses within the designation, and is configured to guide concentrated population growth and intensive land development away from areas of great sensitivity and toward areas more favorable to development. The Rural/Agricultural designation does not prevent development, but instead limits the range of land uses within the designation. Collier County uses a zoning technique called Transfer of Development Rights, which permanently protects land with conversation value by redirecting development to a more suitable area planned to accommodate growth and development. The Collier County Future Land Use Element (Collier County Planning and Zoning Department 2019) states that the Transfer of Development Rights are primarily applicable to the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District and Rural Lands Stewardship Area as a key component of the County’s overall strategy to direct incompatible land uses away from important natural resources, including large connected wetland systems and listed species and their habitat. 2-3 Forecasting Growth A major element of the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP development was to determine the travel demand within the MPO boundary. Travel demand estimation is a critical part of long range transportation planning because it helps ensure that the system will meet future needs. By quantifying the extent and locations of anticipated population and employment growth areas, the demand for travel in 2045 can be estimated using regional travel demand models. Travel demand models test various transportation improvements to determine how well they meet future demands, and use base-year and future-year socioeconomic data (associated with each LRTP update cycle). For the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update, the base- and future- year socioeconomic data were 2015 and 2045, respectively. Base Year (2015) and Forecast Year (2045) Socioeconomic Data Travel demand models are driven in part by the interaction of land use activities and socioeconomic characteristics of the transportation network. Socioeconomic data, such as population, households, employment, and schools, that are located in each Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ), are inputs to the travel demand model. A TAZ is a small geographic unit used in travel models to create trip generation rates for all land uses within the TAZ, and thus cumulatively for the entire region. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-6 Chapter 2 Plan Process The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update includes 730 TAZs for Collier County, as presented in Appendix B. A primary source of socioeconomic data for the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP was Collier County’s 2017 Collier Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) data. The CIGM is a population forecasting model that first predicts where and when residential growth will take place in each TAZ, then forecasts where and when supporting land uses, such as employment, shopping, and schools, will be required. The University of Florida’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) produces Florida’s official state and local population estimates and projections. The BEBR estimates are used for distributing state revenue-sharing dollars to cities and counties in Florida, and their projections for future years are used in city and county comprehensive plans and in MPO plans. BEBR data are provided geographically at the county and city levels and, therefore, are not available by TAZ. Base Year (2015) Developing the base-year socioeconomic data included coordinating and refining the 2017 CIGM population data (produced for each TAZ) to match the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey countywide population estimate for 2015. Other 2015 socioeconomic data came from various sources, including official U.S. Census data and the CIGM, which provided data on jobs, schools, and number of hotel/motel rooms. Forecast Year (2045) The CCGMP requires that the County’s Capital Improvement Plan be based on BEBR data mid-range (or medium) projection (Policy 4.9, Future Land Use Element). To maintain consistency between the CCGMP and the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP, the socioeconomic data for 2045 were adjusted to match the BEBR medium projection for the year 2045 before being used as the forecast data for the travel model. Randall Boulevard looking west toward Immokalee Road (CR 846) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-7 Chapter 2 Plan Process Summary of Socioeconomic Data Table 2-1 summarizes and compares the 2015 and 2045 socioeconomic data. Total residential population is forecasted to increase 43 percent by 2045 at 510,237, with single-family population increasing approximately 63 percent, and multi- family population increasing 21 percent. The total number of dwelling units is expected to increase 29 percent, with single- family dwelling units increasing 47 percent and multi-family dwelling units growing 13 percent. Figures 2-4 and 2-5 present the Dwelling Units Growth and Commercial Square Footage Growth, respectively. The most significant increase in dwelling unit and commercial square footage are primarily located in the following areas: • Rural Land Stewardship Area • Rural Mixed Fringe District The Collier 2045 LRTP 2015 and 2045 Socio-economic Data Technical Memorandum prepared under separate cover (Spikowski Planning Associates 2020) presents further details on the development of the socioeconomic data and forecasting. While the land use forecasting process is based upon reasonable assumptions of future land use and development, it is a forecast based upon the current understanding of where development could occur. Table 2-1. 2015 and 2045 Socioeconomic Data 2015 2045 Growth Single-Family Dwelling Units 102,622 151,104 47% Multi-Family Dwelling Units 115,147 130,655 13% Total Dwelling Units 217,769 281,759 29% Single-Family Population 184,377 300,152 63% Multi-Family Population 173,386 210,085 21% Total Residential Population 357,763 510,237 43% Employees (at place of work/employment) 143,044 212,780 49% Workers (at place of residence) 179,594 194,090 8% Hotel/Motel Units 8,817 9,380 6% Total School Enrollment (including colleges) 67,922 75,117 11% Source: Spikowski Planning Associates 2020 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-8 Chapter 2 Plan Process Figure 2-4. Dwelling Unit Growth Areas Source: Spikowski Planning Associates (2015) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-9 Chapter 2 Plan Process Figure 2-5. Commercial Square Footage Growth Areas Source: Spikowski Planning Associates (2015) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 820 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-10 Chapter 2 Plan Process Travel Model Development Process FDOT requires regional and local transportation planning agencies to use an FDOT-approved travel demand model (if available) for their planning area. Travel models simulate responses people make about how to travel, given various possible network configurations and capacities of highways and transit service. Figure 2-6 presents the approved FDOT travel demand models in Florida. Because Collier County is located within FDOT District One, the FDOT District One Regional Planning Model (D1RPM) was used for the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update. The D1RPM travel model was validated and calibrated for the base year 2015 using actual traffic counts and transit service for 2015, along with the actual 2015 socioeconomic data for each TAZ. The 2015 socioeconomic data was input to the D1RPM travel model and the resulting traffic assignments were compared to actual traffic counts. After the model was validated to approximate 2015 conditions, the 2045 forecast data that had been distributed to each TAZ were used as inputs to estimate travel demand and potential project performance to meet that demand in 2045. The Collier MPO provided FDOT with the socioeconomic data for 2015 and Figure 2-6. FDOT-Approved Travel Demand Models 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 821 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-11 Chapter 2 Plan Process 2045 as inputs for the D1RPM model, and FDOT provided all travel model runs during the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update. Future-year roadway configurations, or alternative scenario travel networks, were developed by modeling the Existing Plus Committed (E+C) travel network using 2045 socioeconomic data to estimate future deficiencies. The E+C network includes all new road or capacity projects that have been implemented since 2015 (existing), plus all projects that have construction funded in the 2023 FDOT 5-Year Work Program (committed). Once potential deficiencies were understood, the new projects were identified as alternative network scenarios for input to the model. In addition to advisory meetings with the TAC and CAC, FDOT and Collier MPO staff held several coordination meetings on issues related to the model development process and the use of the model for developing the Needs Plan and the Cost Feasible Plan. Five alternative network scenarios were modeled and evaluated for the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update. Forecasting Methodology Population estimates and forecasts in travel models count the number of permanent residents in a manner similar to the U.S. Census Bureau. The population input entered into the D1RPM was the “residential population,” or the number of permanent residents in single-family and multi-family dwellings (not including seasonal residents and permanent residents living in group quarters, such as nursing homes, dormitories, jails, etc.). Seasonal residents were not included in the population totals; the dwellings they occupy seasonally were tabulated, but identified as “vacant” along with dwellings that were vacant for other reasons (for example, for sale or for rent). The 2015 American Community Survey of countywide residential population of 357,305 is less than the population from the estimated 2017 CIGM population of 367,516. Therefore, the CIGM population and housing data for 2017 were correlated to 2015 levels. To forecast 2045 estimates, the CIGM first determines the likely amount of residential, commercial, and industrial development in each TAZ at full build-out. For the LRTP update, logistic growth curves were adjusted for certain TAZs to simulate a conservative growth rate through 2045, so that the county-wide residential population would be aligned with the BEBR medium projection for 2045. These growth-curve adjustments had no effect on the anticipated density and intensity at build-out of any TAZ based on applicable land use designations. The 2015 employment levels were prepared by FDOT based on data from InfoUSA, a commercial provider. The CIGM employee forecasts for 2045 were the primary basis for socioeconomic data on employment for 2045, as neither InfoUSA nor any source other than the CIGM is able to provide accurate forecasts for small areas, such as TAZs. The CIGM also provided 2045 forecasts for industrial, retail, office, and public school employees. The CIGM school enrollment data consists of the number of students attending a K–12 public school in each TAZ. School enrollment data were supplemented with charter school and private school enrollments from the Collier County School District and the Florida Department of Education, respectively. School enrollment data were further supplemented with the number of students in colleges and universities. The 2045 total school enrollment forecasts were derived similar to the population growth forecasts. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 822 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-12 Chapter 2 Plan Process Additional 2015 data used for the D1RPM included the U.S. Census Bureau data plus data provided directly by county and state agencies, including the number of single-family dwellings in each TAZ with two or more vehicles and the average household income in each TAZ. Because the U.S. Census does not provide separate data by TAZ, multiple adjoining TAZs were assigned the data from a single larger area, such as a Census block group or Census tract. 2-4 Public Participation The major steps defined in the public participation process are consistent with the major milestones in the LRTP development process (refer to Figure 2-1). Public outreach techniques during the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update included public meetings, newsletters, website, social media, surveys, and public service announcements. The 2045 LRTP Public Involvement Summary Report (provided under separate cover) presents a detailed summary of the public outreach efforts and results. Table 2-2 presents a chronology of the public participation outreach throughout the 2045 LRTP update. The 2045 LRTP update was kicked off by presenting an overview of the LRTP process and tasks at the MPO Board and TAC/CAC meetings in May 2019. The LRTP update process began with developing the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Public Involvement Plan (provided under separate cover), which was presented to the TAC/CAC and MPO Board on August 26 and September 13, 2019, respectively. The PIP identifies outreach efforts and techniques that give officials, agencies, local government, interested parties, and the public an opportunity to participate in the planning process. The PIP also identifies methods to measure the effectiveness of the outreach. Additionally, the LRTP 2045 Goals, Objectives and Decision- Making Framework White Paper (provided under separate cover) was also presented to the MPO Board and TAC/CAC, which included a presentation of the proposed Vision, Goals, and Objectives, and evaluation criteria of the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update. The TAC/CAC and MPO Board comments were subsequently incorporated into the documents, and the MPO Board endorsed the PIP and the Goals, Objectives and Decision-Making Framework White Paper during their regularly scheduled meeting on October 11, 2019. Advisory meetings with the TAC/CAC were established during the early phases of the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update. The advisory meetings provided valuable feedback during the development of the E+C Network alternatives for network scenario planning, Needs Plan development, and the Cost Feasible Plan development. The COVID-19 pandemic occurred during the 2045 LRTP update, requiring some of the meetings to be moved to a virtual platform. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-13 Chapter 2 Plan Process Table 2-2. Public Participation Events Event Details Group Date 2045 LRTP Kickoff - Overview of LRTP Tasks MPO Board 5/10/2020 TAC/CAC 5/20/2020 Presentation of Draft Evaluation Framework White Paper and Draft PIP TAC/CAC 8/26/2019 MPO Board 9/13/2019 Presentation of Updates to the Evaluation Framework White Paper and PIP based on MPO input. Endorsed by MPO Board. MPO Board 10/11/2019 Presentation of E+C Network and basic Socioeconomic Data. Board approved submittal of the E+C Network to FDOT. TAC/CAC 10/28/2019 MPO Board 11/8/2019 Attended the Ciclovia Immokalee event at the Immokalee Community Park to present the E+C Network and to distribute the LRTP Kick-off Survey and newsletter. Members of the Public 11/2/2019 Presentation of the 2045 Socioeconomic Forecast Zonal Data (by Traffic Analysis Zone). TAC/CAC endorsed the zonal data. MPO Board approved submittal of the zonal data to FDOT. TAC/CAC 11/25/2019 MPO Board 12/13/2019 2045 External Station Volume Projections Coordination Meeting MPO Staff and Representatives, FDOT Traffic Staff and Representatives 1/24/2020 2045 External Station Volume Projections Coordination Meeting MPO Staff and Representatives, FDOT Traffic Staff and Representatives 2/3/2020 2045 LRTP Socioeconomic Data Coordination meeting MPO Staff and Representatives, FDOT Traffic Staff and Representatives 3/26/2020 Traffic and Socioeconomic Data Coordination MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff 4/9/2020 Alternative 1 Modeling Coordination MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff 4/15/2020 2045 LRTP Network Scenarios Coordination MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff 5/6/2020 Alternative 1 Modeling Results and Alternative 2 Modeling Coordination MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff, Lee County MPO Director 5/12/2020 Alternative 2 Modeling Coordination MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff 5/14/2020 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-14 Chapter 2 Plan Process Table 2-2. Public Participation Events Event Details Group Date Presentation of Alternative 1 Network Scenario modeling results and Proposed Alternative 2 Network Scenario. TAC/CAC provided input. TAC/CAC 5/18/2020 Alternative 2 Modeling Results and Alternative 3 Modeling Coordination MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff 6/9/2020 Presentation of Alternative 2 Network Scenario modeling results and Proposed Alternative 3 Cost Feasible Network. TAC/CAC and MPO Board provided input. TAC/CAC 6/10/2020 MPO Board 6/12/2020 Needs Plan Projects List Evaluation Scoring Coordination MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff 6/30/2020 Alternative 3 Modeling Results and Alternative 4 Modeling Coordination MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff 7/7/2020 Presentation of Alternative 3 Cost Feasible Network modeling results, evaluation criteria scoring, and project rankings. TAC/CAC provided input. TAC/CAC 7/8/2020 Transit Planning and Congestion Management Coordination Meeting MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff, FDOT Staff and Representatives, Lee County MPO Director 7/14/2020 Alternative 4 Modeling Coordination MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff 7/16/2020 Virtual Public Meeting Number 1. Presentation of the Draft Project Needs List and overview of the LRTP process. Panel of Collier MPO Staff, Collier County Staff, and FDOT Staff present for the question and answer session. Members of the Public 7/29/2020 Alternative 4 Modeling Results and Alternative 5 Modeling Coordination MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff, Lee County MPO Director 8/6/2020 Presentation of Alternative 4 Cost Feasible Network modeling results, proposed Alternative 5 Cost Feasible Network, project costs, revenue forecasts, and the 7/29/2020 virtual public meeting results. TAC/CAC provided input. TAC/CAC 8/7/2020 2045 LRTP Revenue Projections Coordination MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff 8/10/2020 Alternative 5 Modeling Coordination MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff 8/17/2020 Alternative 5 Modeling Coordination MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff 8/18/2020 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-15 Chapter 2 Plan Process Table 2-2. Public Participation Events Event Details Group Date Alternative 5 Modeling Results and Cost Feasible Plan Projects Coordination MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff 9/9/2020 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Projects and Alternative 5 Comments Coordination Meeting MPO Staff and Representatives, Collier County Staff, FDOT Staff and Representatives 9/11/2020 Presentation of Final Project Needs List, Draft Cost Feasible Plan, revenue forecast, project costs, project rankings, and results of public input. MPO Board provided input. MPO Board 9/11/2020 Presentation of the Needs Plan Projects Immokalee CRA 8/19/2020 Presentation of the Needs Plan Projects Collier MPO LCB 9/16/2020 Virtual Public Meeting Number 2. Presentation of the Draft Cost Feasible Plan. Panel of Collier MPO Staff, Collier County Staff, and FDOT Staff present for the question and answer session. Members of the Public 10/14/2020 Presentation of the results of public input, Draft Cost Feasible Plan, and Draft LRTP. TAC/CAC and MPO Board provided input. TAC/CAC 10/26/2020 MPO Board 11/13/2020 Presentation of the Final Cost Feasible Plan and Final LRTP. MPO Board approved Final LRTP for adoption. MPO Board 12/11/2020 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-16 Chapter 2 Plan Process Public input was an important part of the LRTP development process and helped refine the community’s collective goals and objectives, which in turn helped guide the entire planning process. The first public engagement activity was a Kick-Off Public Survey, which was posted on the Collier MPO website. The initial community outreach occurred November 2, 2019, when Collier MPO representatives attended the Ciclovia Immokalee event. This event was at the Immokalee Community Park and is a free family-friendly event held monthly to promote healthy habits and physical activities for families. The LRTP Kick-Off Public Survey and Newsletter were distributed at the event and transportation network maps were displayed. In addition to completing the survey, attendees were invited to the Collier MPO Information Booth to view the E+C network and provide input on existing and future needed transportation projects. Local Residents View Maps at the Ciclovia Immokalee Event on November 2, 2019 Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the public involvement meetings were moved to a virtual platform. The first virtual public meeting was held in July 2020 using a GoToMeeting platform and presented the Draft Needs Plan. The second virtual public meeting was held using Zoom in October 2020 and presented the Draft Cost Feasible Plan. Both meetings were advertised through the Collier MPO website and the Collier County Facebook page and were further promoted using a Facebook ad 1 week prior to the events. Virtual Public Meeting #1 included the following displays for public review on the Collier MPO website: • LRTP Process and Schedule • LRTP Goals and Objectives • Draft Needs Network • 2045 Forecasted Growth • Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan • Proposed Transit Network • Prerecorded video presentation Additionally, a map of the Draft Project Needs List was presented in a WikiProject Map on the Collier MPO website and made available to the public 1 week prior to the virtual public meeting. The WikiProject Map allowed viewers to select their top five projects from the needs project list and provide comments on the projects, and also included a short survey. Virtual Public Meeting #2 included the following displays for public review on the Collier MPO website: • 2045 Collier MPO Draft LRTP Chapters 1 through 6 • Draft Cost Feasible Plan Roadway Network Map and Table 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2-17 Chapter 2 Plan Process • Draft Cost Feasible Plan Roadway Network Maps by funding years • Bicycle and Pedestrian Draft Cost Feasible Map • Prerecorded video presentation At the start of each virtual public meeting, participants were greeted with a pre-recorded video presentation. A panel of MPO staff and representatives, Collier County staff, and FDOT staff was available for the question-and-answer portion of the virtual meeting. Participants were asked to submit questions prior to the meeting but could also ask questions using the chat option during the meeting. A moderator presented the questions to the panel during the question-and-answer portion of the meeting. Meeting participants were asked to complete a comment form after the meeting and to complete the wiki map and survey exercise on the MPO website if they had not already done so. The comment period for the 2045 LRTP Draft Needs Assessment Plan, and the 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan remained open through August 12, 2020, and October 31, 2020, respectively. In addition to the public workshops, scheduled project updates were given to the TAC/CAC and the MPO Board. As the process reached the point of plan deliverables, technical memoranda were prepared and submitted to the TAC/CAC and MPO Board for review and comment. Following the development of this Draft Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update document, and during the formal public comment period, copies of the document were distributed to a variety of publicly accessible locations (for example, public libraries, government center, etc.) and another virtual public meeting was conducted to solicit comments on the draft LRTP document, including the Cost Feasible Plan recommendations. All public written comments received throughout the process were incorporated as part of the Support Documentation, and any comments received during the public comment period were specifically addressed prior to the Collier MPO’s adoption hearing. Screen Capture from Virtual Public Meeting No. 1 Screen Capture from Virtual Public Meeting No. 2 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives 3-1 Long Range Vision for Collier County Transportation 3-2 2045 LRTP Goals 3-3 Applying Priorities to Decision-Making 3 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-1 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives 3-1 Long Range Vision for Collier County Transportation The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP development process began early in 2019 by establishing the plan’s vision statement, goals, and objectives. The goals and objectives help guide the LRTP process to meet the Collier MPO’s vision, while considering federal, state, and regional priorities. The LRTP goals and objectives refine the Collier MPO’s vision and are a critical part of the planning process because the project needs are established based on these goals and objectives. Federal Planning Factors This 2045 LRTP Update addresses federal mandates for regional transportation planning. As noted in Chapter 1, the guidance, commonly referred to as FHWA’s Expectations Letter, outlines the agency’s expectations for the development of LRTP updates to help MPOs meet the federal planning requirements. Based on the FAST Act provisions, the FHWA Expectations Letter notes that MPOs are now required to address the following new planning factors: • Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system, and reduce or mitigate storm water impacts of surface transportation • Enhance travel and tourism Including these two new planning factors, the FAST Act requires 10 planning factors for long-range transportation planning (detailed in Chapter 1-3). Figure 3-1 illustrates the federal planning factors. Figure 3-1. Federal Planning Factors Source: FDOT (2019c) “The Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan envisions the development of an integrated multimodal transportation system to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people and goods while addressing current and future transportation demand, environmental sustainability, and community character.” Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Vision Statement 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-2 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Statewide and Metropolitan Planning Priorities Florida statutes require that LRTPs include projects and strategies that will serve all modes of transportation and benefit the region as follows: • Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency • Increase the safety and security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users • Increase accessibility and mobility options available to people and for freight • Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, and improve quality of life • Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight • Promote efficient system management and operation • Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system The LRTP should emphasize coordination with local juris- dictions (cities of Naples, Marco Island, and Everglades City) and consistency with future land use planning and locally adopted comprehensive plans of those entities and should consider a 20-year planning horizon. The LRTP should strive for integrated land use and transportation planning that fosters sustainable development and reduces greenhouse gas emissions. Collier County Growth Management Plan The Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (Collier County 2020b) (the County’s comprehensive plan) was adopted in 1997 and amended in November 2019. The plan’s core principles of growth include: • Protect natural resource systems and guide development away from areas of greatest sensitivity • Coordinate land use and public facilities to develop within Urban Designated Areas • Manage coastal development • Provide adequate and affordable housing • Attain high-quality urban design • Improve efficiency and effectiveness in the land use regulatory system • Protect private property rights Collier County Community Housing Plan The Collier County Community Housing Plan (Collier County 2017) has the central goal of a diverse range of attainable and affordable housing for all residents. Specific transportation recommendations from this plan include: • Integrate bus routes with affordable housing locations: identify corridors for multi-family development, imple- ment park-and-ride systems, and explore bus rapid transit (BRT) and express service lines • Enhance bike lane and pedestrian systems: implement Comprehensive Pathways Plan; enhance safety for vulnerable users 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-3 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives • Ride-sharing options for enhanced mobility: create a ride-sharing option • Revenue for transit and alternative mobility: establish sustainable and secure revenue streams; implement a recurring revenue source; establish uniform standards to determine the impacts on transit from new development 3-2 2045 LRTP Goals The advisory committees endorsed, and the MPO Board approved in October 2019, a White Paper entitled Goals, Objectives and Decision-Making Framework for the 2045 LRTP. The following material is consistent with that document. The 2045 LRTP Goals include: • Goal #1: Ensure the Security of Transportation System for Users • Goal #2: Protect Environmental Resources • Goal #3: Improve System Continuity and Connectivity • Goal #4: Reduce Roadway Congestion • Goal #5: Promote Freight Movement • Goal #6: Increase the Safety of the Transportation System for Users • Goal #7: Promote Multimodal Solutions • Goal #8: Promote the Integrated Planning of Transportation and Land Use • Goal #9: Promote Sustainability in the Planning of Transportation and Land Use • Goal #10: Consider Climate Change Vulnerability and Risk in Transportation • Goal #11: Consider Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAV) Technology in Future Goals 1 through 8 and their associated objectives (summarized in the following section) originated in the Collier MPO 2040 LRTP. These goals were accepted by the Collier MPO Board on May 10, 2019. Goals 9 and 10 along with their associated objectives were added in response to new federal planning factors as well as input received from the TAC at their May 20, 2019 meeting. Goals 9 and 10 address sustainability and resiliency, which are becoming more important in transportation planning as extreme weather events, such as flooding, severe heat, and intense storms, threaten the long-term investments that federal, state, and local governments have made in transportation infrastructure. The Collier MPO added Goal 11 in response to the new FDOT requirement summarized as follows. In May 2018 the FDOT Office of Policy Planning issued Guidance for Assessing Planning Impacts and Opportunities of Automated, Connected, Electric and Shared-Use Vehicle (FDOT 2018), which notes that a key role of MPOs in supporting the state of Florida’s transition to an Automated, Connected, Electric and Shared- Use future will include developing policies and prioritizing projects that encourage shared-use of vehicles. Therefore, new FDOT requirements state that LRTPs must at a minimum: Assess capital investment and other measures necessary to make the most efficient use of existing transportation facilities to relieve vehicular congestion, improve safety, and maximize the mobility of people and goods. Such efforts must include, but are not limited to, consideration of infrastructure and technological improvements necessary to accommodate 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-4 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives advances in vehicle technology, such as autonomous technology and other developments. [s.339.175(7)(c)(2), F.S.] Priorities: Goals, Objectives, and Evaluation Criteria The 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives are listed on the following pages. The goals provide a framework for realizing the LRTP vision. The objectives provide specific guidance on how to achieve each goal. This LRTP is guided by the goals and objectives, each of which represents a specific element of how the transportation system should be managed for the next 25 years. The 11 goals are intended to maintain Collier County and its incorporated cities as livable communities and to improve the Countywide transportation system, keeping pace with growth and expected demand for transportation services in the region. Evaluation criteria were used to evaluate and compare how well potential transportation projects met the goals and objectives. Additionally, each goal was assigned a weighting factor that placed more emphasis on certain goals that require more focus in the Collier MPO transportation system. A project evaluation criterion shows the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed projects independently as well as in relation to each other. As shown on Figure 3-2, this type of evaluation is ultimately used to develop the recom- mendations and prioritize transportation projects in the Needs Assessment and Cost Feasible Plan. To support the performance-based process emphasized in the FAST Act, the following pages present defined goals and objectives and the evaluation criteria applied to each proposed project. Figure 3-2. LRTP Development Framework 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-5 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Goal #1: Ensure the Security of Transportation System for Users The primary security issue for Collier County residents relates to implementation of sound emergency management plans. The primary threat to the County is extreme weather events, particularly hurricanes and wildfires. As a result, emphasis has been placed on enhancing important evacuation routes. The total weighting factor for this goal is 8 percent. Objectives: • Enhance important evacuation routes • Maintain sound transportation components of the emergency management plan for Collier County Project Evaluation Criteria: • Improves or maintains critical evacuation routes • Provides enhanced or potential new evacuation routes where needed Goal #2: Protect Environmental Resources Collier County is fortunate to have wide-ranging environmental resources including extensive wetland resources and natural wildlife areas that greatly enhance the quality of life for resi- dents and visitors. Protection of these resources has been highly valued in the 2045 LRTP. The total weighting factor for this goal is 12 percent. Objectives: • Minimize encroachment by transportation projects on wetlands and other protected natural areas • Minimize adverse impacts on threatened and endangered species Project Evaluation Criteria: • Minimize wetland encroachments by transportation projects • Minimize impacts to wetland flows (maintain or enhance existing flows to the extent feasible) • Minimize the adverse impacts on threatened and endangered species 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-6 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Goal #3: Improve System Continuity and Connectivity Continuity and connectivity make it easier for residents and visitors to access the transportation system as directly as possible. Connectivity is a priority for all modes, and the future network provides direct routes and reduces travel time. The total weighting factor for this goal is 10 percent. Objectives: • Improve continuity and capacity of existing facilities • Promote connectivity by creating new transportation links • Create a network of direct routes between and within areas of development Project Evaluation Criteria: • Improves existing infrastructure deficiencies • Improves connectivity with new transportation links to address system gaps Goal #4: Reduce Roadway Congestion Congestion and accompanying delay poses a serious cost to the residents of Collier County, reducing their access to jobs, education, health care, shopping, recreation, and other activities. The 2045 LRTP emphasizes reducing congestion to help enhance the quality of life for County residents. The total weighting factor for this goal is 18 percent. Objectives: • Reduce the number of deficient roadways (those with a high volume-to-capacity ratio) identified in the 2045 existing plus committed (E+C) network • Reduce travel delay between residential areas and key destinations Project Evaluation Criteria: • Improves existing deficient facility or improves a new or neighboring facility intended to relieve an existing deficient facility • Improves intersections and roadways with poor levels of service 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-7 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Goal #5: Promote Freight Movement Efficient freight movement is directly related to the economic well-being of a community. The cost of moving freight is reflected in all consumables and in local production activities. The total weighting factor for this goal is 6 percent. Objectives: • Enhance movement on major regional freight mobility corridors or freight distribution routes • Improve access to freight activity centers (distribution facilities or major commercial/industrial districts) Project Evaluation Criteria: • Enhances operation of the facility identified as a major freight route Goal #6: Increase the Safety of the Transportation System for Users Safety of the transportation system is an important factor in the MPO's planning and project development process. The investment of projects that enhance safety will lead to reduced crashes and lower crash severity for all modes of transporta- tion. The total weighting factor for this goal is 10 percent. Objectives: • Reduce the number of fatalities, injuries, and crashes • Ensure adequate bicycle and pedestrian facilities are incorporated into new highway and transit projects • Implement safety-related improvements on high crash corridors Project Evaluation Criteria: • Enhances safety of transportation system users • Improves facility or intersection identified as having a high crash occurrence or a fatality • Promotes traffic calming • Reduces vehicular conflicts with bicyclists, pedestrians, and other vulnerable road users 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-8 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Goal #7: Promote Multimodal Solutions The County recognizes the importance of alternative forms of transportation that promote healthful living, improve air quality, and improve residents’ quality of life. The total weighting factor for this goal is 10 percent. Objectives: • Improve frequency and reliability of public transit service routes and improve access to park-and-ride lots • Improve pedestrian and bicycle facilities • Improve air quality • Improve quality of life • Promote healthy living • Implement Complete Streets policies1 Project Evaluation Criteria: • Provides for trail improvements that implement the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan 1 https://www.fdot.gov/roadway/csi/default.shtm • Provides multimodal improvement near affordable housing, centers of employment, multi-family housing, health care, educational, recreational, or cultural centers • Provides multimodal improvements for environmental justice communities and underserved neighborhoods, and connects these neighborhoods to centers of employment and important destinations for transit- dependent households • Improves transit (frequency and reliability) within existing or future transit service areas (TSA) or within a com- munity redevelopment area (CRA); improves access to park-and-ride facilities; provides for BRT • Improves bicycle or pedestrian access to transit • Improves safety and access for people of all ages and abilities; improves safety for people walking, biking, and using mobility devices 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-9 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Goal #8: Promote the Integrated Planning of Transportation and Land Use Transportation improvements can often result in new economic development and land use activity. In turn, decisions related to land use and economic development are often the basis for transportation system investments. The Collier MPO strives to develop projects that promote land use objectives of the County and its incorporated cities. The total weighting factor for this goal is 10 percent. Objectives: • Coordinate with local governments and partner agencies to assure transportation plans and programs support local land use plans and a sustainable transportation system • Assure that local growth management objectives are reflected in transportation plans and programs • Assure that transportation plans and projects promote economic sustainability for the County Project Evaluation Criteria: • Improves access to regional travel (for example, interstates, airports, ports, and SIS facilities) • Improves access to tourist destinations • Supports targeted redevelopments or CRAs (multimodal or vehicle improvements) • Identified in partner agency (city, transit, county, MPO, etc.) plans as a priority • Improves vehicle or freight movement to an intermodal facility Goal #9: Promote Sustainability in the Planning of Transportation and Land Use A sustainable transportation system allows for the basic access and needs of the community to be met safely. It operates fairly and efficiently, offers a choice of transportation modes, and promotes equity for all users. The total weighting factor for this goal is 8 percent. Objectives: • Improve the sustainability of communities through increased access to affordable housing and centers of employment and reduced automobile dependency • Ensure that transportation system improvements are equitable and fair to all residents of the County • Engage a diverse public in the development of the region’s transportation system Project Evaluation Criteria: • Benefits low-income areas and improves sustainability through increased housing choices and reduced automobile dependency 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-10 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Goal #10: Consider Climate Change Vulnerability and Risk in Transportation A resilient transportation system is one that supports mobility, system preservation, and evacuation needs, and addresses social equity. The total weighting factor for this goal is 4 percent. Objectives: • Identify key climate impacts (rising sea levels, hurricanes, etc.) • Identify sensitive assets and thresholds for impacts • Identify, evaluate, and adopt strategies to address identified vulnerabilities • Screen projects during planning to avoid making investments in particularly vulnerable areas Project Evaluation Criteria: • Promotes transportation infrastructure resiliency in the face of climate change and sea level rise Goal #11: Consider Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAV) Technology in Future Advances in automotive infrastructure technology through connected vehicles or self-driving cars pose some of the biggest challenges to transportation planning (for example, equity among users). The potential for disruptions to transportations systems includes changes to land uses and the system network itself. However, because of the potential safety benefits, the Collier MPO is exploring ways to incorporate these technologies into the transportation network. The total weighting factor for this goal is 4 percent. Objectives: • Explore options for application and implementation of CAV technologies, in light of the lack of current guidance. • Consider new guidance and developments during the LRTP process. Project Evaluation Criteria: • Uses technological improvements (for example, ITS, Transit Signal Priority, etc.) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-11 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives 3-3 Applying Priorities to Decision-Making The 2045 LRTP development process builds upon the 2040 LRTP and input from the MPO Board, advisory committees, planning partners, and public input (surveys) to establish the long-range vision statement for the MPO’s transportation system in 2045. The goals and objectives of the transportation plan are established to help realize this vision. The goals and objectives of the LRTP ultimately guide the entire LRTP development process by creating a decision-making framework through which projects can be evaluated and ranked to define and document project priorities. Evaluation Criteria for Project Selection Like the goals and objectives, the 2045 LRTP evaluation criteria (refer to Table 3-1) build upon the evaluation criteria established in the 2040 plan. Evaluation criteria are used to evaluate and then compare how well potential transportation projects meet the goals and objectives. Each criterion is assigned a weighting factor that places more emphasis on those criteria that require more focus in the Collier MPO transportation system. Ultimately, this type of evaluation is used to develop the recommendations and prioritize transportation projects. The evaluation criteria and performance measures listed in Table 3-1 demonstrate the scoring methodology for project evaluation and selection, creating an actionable way for the vision, goals, and objectives to shape project selection. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-12 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Table 3-1. 2045 LRTP Evaluation Criteria and Performance Measures Goal Evaluation Criteria Performance Measures Weighting (out of 100) 1. Ensure the Security of Transportation System for Users Total Weighting Factor: 8% 1A - Improves or maintains critical evacuation routes Yes = 5; No = 0 4 1B - Provides enhanced or potential new evacuation routes where needed Does the roadway connect to an existing evacuation route or does it have potential to be a new evacuation route (for example, major extension or new project that connects to a Strategic Intermodal System?) Yes = 5; No = 0 4 2. Protect Environmental Resources Total Weighting Factor: 12% 2A - Minimize wetland encroachments by transportation projects How many acres of wetland encroachment based on National Wetlands Inventory? No impact = 0; 0–5 acres = -1; 6–10 acres = -2; 11–15 = -3; 15–20 = -4; 21 or more = -5 (max) 4 2B - Minimize impacts to wetland flows (maintain or enhance existing flows to the extent feasible) Proximity to protected natural areas (0.5 miles) Within 0.5 miles of Conservation Areas/Preserves lands? Yes = -1 No = 0 4 2C - Minimize the adverse impacts on threatened and endangered species Amount of habitat encroachment based on primary panther habitat? No impact = 0 0–10 acres = -1 11–20 acres = -2 21–30 = -3 31–40 = -4 40 or more = -5 (max) 4 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-13 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Table 3-1. 2045 LRTP Evaluation Criteria and Performance Measures Goal Evaluation Criteria Performance Measures Weighting (out of 100) 3. Improve System Continuity and Connectivity Total Weighting Factor: 10% 3A - Improves existing infrastructure deficiencies Does the project improve mobility in an existing roadway facility (for example, widening, intersection improvements, etc.)? Yes = 5; No = 0 5 3B - Improves connectivity with new transportation links to address system gaps Does the project improve connectivity with a new facility including projects that are extensions that connect to future or existing facilities? Yes = 5; No = 0 5 4. Reduce Roadway Congestion Total Weighting Factor: 18% 4A - Improves existing deficient facility or improves a new or neighboring facility intended to relieve an existing deficient facility Does the project increase capacity or provide relief to a parallel facility (for example, new facilities, bridges over canals, etc.)? Yes = 5; No = 0 9 4B - Improves intersections and roadways with poor levels of service Does capacity ratio decrease when compared to the 2045 E+C Alternative? Yes = 5; No = 0 9 5. Promote Freight Movement Total Weighting Factor: 6% 5 - Enhances operation of the facility identified as a major freight route Is the roadway on a regional freight mobility corridor, freight distribution route, or connects to a freight activity center as outlined in the 2040 LRTP? Yes = 5; No = 0 6 6. Increase the Safety of Transportation System Users Total Weighting Factor: 10% 6A - Enhances safety of transportation system users Does project implement a recommendation from a safety plan (for example, safe routes to school, protected bike lanes, etc.)? Yes = 5; No = 0 2 6B - Improves facility or intersection identified as having a high crash occurrence or a fatality High crash location or segment? Yes = 5; No = 0 4 6C – Promotes traffic calming Does the project improve safety by calming traffic (for example, gateway treatments, roundabouts, reduced width and turning 2 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-14 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Table 3-1. 2045 LRTP Evaluation Criteria and Performance Measures Goal Evaluation Criteria Performance Measures Weighting (out of 100) radii)? Are vehicular speeds appropriate to context and facility type? Yes = 5; No = 0 6D - Reduces vehicular conflicts with bicyclists, pedestrians, and other vulnerable road users High crash location or segment for bicycle and pedestrian conflicts? Yes = 5; No = 0 2 7. Promote Multimodal Solutions Total Weighting Factor: 10% 7A - Provides for trail improvements that implement the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan New or improved trail/greenways = 5 No new or improved trail = 0 2 7B - Provides multimodal improvement near affordable housing, centers of employment, multi-family housing, health care, educational, recreational, or cultural centers Improvement within 0.25 miles = 5 No improvement within 0.25 mile = 0 2 7C - Provides multimodal improvements for environmental justice communities and underserved neighborhoods, and connects these neighborhoods to centers of employment and important destinations for transit- dependent households Improvement within 0.25 miles = 5 No improvement within 0.25 miles = 0 2 7D - Improves transit (frequency and reliability) within existing or future TSAs or within a CRA; improves access to park-and-ride facilities; provides for BRT Project along an existing or planned bus route within an existing or future TSA = 5 Project along an existing or planned bus route inside a CRA = 5 Improves access to park-and-ride facility = 5 Provides for BRT = 5 1 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-15 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Table 3-1. 2045 LRTP Evaluation Criteria and Performance Measures Goal Evaluation Criteria Performance Measures Weighting (out of 100) No improvement = 0 7E - Improves bicycle or pedestrian access to transit Improve Access = 5; No improvement = 0 2 7F – Improves safety and access for people of all ages and abilities; improves safety for people walking, biking, and using mobility devices Improvement = 5 No improvement = 0 1 8. Promote the Integrated Planning of Transportation and Land Use Total Weighting Factor: 10% 8A - Improves access to regional travel (for example, interstates, airports, ports, and SIS facilities) Improves access = 5 Does not improve access = 0 4 8B - Improves access to tourist destinations Improves access = 5 Does not improve access = 0 2 8C - Supports targeted redevelopments or CRAs (multimodal or vehicle improvements) Yes = 5 No = 0 2 8D - Identified in partner agency (city, transit, county, MPO, etc.) as a priority Connections to other municipalities or counties? Yes = 5 No = 0 1 8E - Improves vehicle or freight movement to an intermodal facility Does the project improve vehicle or freight movement to intermodal facilities (for example, airport, bus transfer station, freight center, park and ride, etc.)? Yes = 5 No = 0 1 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3-16 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Table 3-1. 2045 LRTP Evaluation Criteria and Performance Measures Goal Evaluation Criteria Performance Measures Weighting (out of 100) 9. Promote Sustainability in the Planning of Transportation and Land Use Total Weighting Factor: 8% 9A - Benefits low-income areas and improves sustainability through increased housing choices and reduced automobile dependency Does the project bring better mobility to a low-income areas and CRAs (for example, bike/ped improvements along a bus route or stop, etc.)? Project in target area=5 Project not in target area=0 8 10. Consider Climate Change Vulnerability and Risk in Transportation Decision- Making Total Weighting Factor: 4% 10A - Promotes transportation infrastructure resiliency in the face of climate change and sea level rise Within 0.25 miles of NOAA 1 ft Sea Level Rise Flooding Area =5 Within 0.25 miles of NOAA 1 ft Sea Level Rise Low Lying Area = 3 Not in high risk area = 0 4 11. Consider Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAV) Technology in the Future Total Weighting Factor: 4% 11A - Utilizes technological improvements (ITS, Transit Signal Priority, etc.) Yes = 5 No = 0 4 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation 2045 Needs Plan 4-1 Needs Plan Overview 4-2 Roadway Needs 4-3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs 4-4 Transit Needs 4-5 Air Transportation Needs 4 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 846 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-1 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan 4-1 Needs Plan Overview The 2045 LRTP Needs Plan identifies the multimodal trans- portation projects needed to address existing and future transportation network deficiencies within the MPO’s juris- diction without considering funding limitations. Developing the Needs Plan is the starting point for understanding and prioritizing the region’s overall transportation needs. How- ever, once the applicable transportation revenues available to the Collier MPO are applied to the Needs Plan, the number of projects that can be constructed to address the needs becomes significantly reduced. Projects in the Needs Plan are evaluated by scoring each project using defined goals and objectives, and the evaluation criteria described in Chapter 3. The projects that rank the highest are focused on when selecting which projects to include in the Cost Feasible Plan. This process is explained further in the Cost Feasible Plan section of this document. While the projects shown as transportation needs are not fiscally constrained, associated policy and environmental constraints exist. The following policy constraints are noted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan Transportation Element (Collier County Planning and Zoning Department 2017) amended June 13, 2017: • All future roadway capacity improvements shall include provisions for both bicycles and pedestrians. • County facilities are to be maintained at a level of service (LOS) standard “D” or “E” as measured on a peak hour basis; LOS calculations are to be based on traffic experienced for 10 months of the year with peak seasonal and tourist months of February and March omitted. • County roadways are constrained to a maximum of six lanes or when intensive land use development is immediately adjacent to roads. Roadways identified as constrained shall be subject to growth restrictions to not further degrade their LOS. • The County will provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future right-of-way (ROW). Sufficient ROW shall be acquired to facilitate arterial and collector roads as appropriate to meet the needs of the LRTP or other adopted transportation studies, plans or programs, appropriate turn lanes, medians, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, drainage canals, a shoulder sufficient for pull offs, and landscaping areas. • The County is considering the viability of a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan ordinance to preserve ROW for corridors or projects listed in the LRTP. This policy includes adoption of Corridor Preservation Maps and Tables and Critical Intersection Maps and Tables; and limits land uses within the corridors to direct incompatible land uses away from environmentally sensitive resources. • Reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and greenhouse gas emissions by providing for the safe movement of nonmotorized vehicles in new construction and reconstruction of roadways. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 847 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-2 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan • Establish an integrated and connected road network to provide multiple, viable alternative travel modes or routes for common trips within the Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) and the East Central TCMA. Maintain 85 percent of the roadways within the TCMAs at or above the County LOS standard. • Transportation projects are to be pursued in a manner consistent with the findings of the County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). • Encourage safe and efficient mobility for people traveling in rural areas that is compatible with the character of the County’s rural areas. Examine the maintenance and operational needs of the rural roadway system, addressing the mobility needs of rural residents to include availability of roads for rural-to-urban travel, travel within the rural area, and for emergency evacuation purposes. • Improve transit services for the transportation- disadvantaged in rural areas. • Encourage the efficient use of transit services now and, in the future, consider intergovernmental efforts to coordinate public transit service between Naples and Bonita Springs in Lee County. In September 2014, FDOT adopted the Statewide Complete Streets Policy (Topic No. 000-625-017-a). Additionally, the City of Naples and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved Complete Streets Resolutions in November 2015 and January 2019, respectively. Complete Streets serve the transportation needs of users of all ages and abilities, including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, motorists, and freight handlers. A transportation system based on Complete Streets principles can help to promote safety, quality of life, and economic development. Complete Streets are context-sensitive, and the approach provides transportation system design that considers local land development patterns. Roadways are to be planned and designed to support the safety, comfort, and mobility of all users based on the unique context of each roadway. The FDOT context classification system broadly identifies the various built environments existing in Florida. Identifying the context classification is a preliminary step in planning and design, as different context classifications will have different design criteria. The context classification of each roadway must be considered, along with its transportation characteristics and the built form to understand who uses or could use it, the regional and local travel demand of the roadway, and the challenges and opportunities of each roadway user. As shown on Figure 4-1, FDOT defined eight context classifications that identify various built environments in Florida. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-3 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan The following policy constraints are noted in the City of Naples Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element (City of Naples 2010) amended October 20, 2010: • Evaluate proposed street improvements in Naples that may potentially increase through traffic volumes to protect residential neighborhoods. • Maintain LOS C as a goal for the arterials and all major collectors, except for Fifth Avenue South between U.S. 41 and Gulf Shore Boulevard. • Naples shall not permit construction of vehicle road overpasses or flyovers in favor of feasible alternative planning solutions that will improve the long-term traffic circulation patterns in the City. • Evaluate programs to modify peak hour travel demand and reduce the number of VMT per capita. • Assist the Southwest Florida Land Preservation Trust in acquiring necessary easements and funding for the design and construction of a greenway bicycle/pedestrian pathway. • Maintain or reduce hurricane evacuation times. • Enhance the safety, connectivity, and mobility of existing and future pedestrian and bicycle pathways. • Continue to coordinate with the Collier MPO to evaluate the potential for developing an efficient public transportation system and mechanisms to reduce the reliance on private motor vehicles. Figure 4-1. FDOT Context Classifications Source: FDOT Context Classification Guide (FDOT 2020c) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-4 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan • Establish a transportation mobility program to identify and implement strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Focus on programs, policies, and code adoptions that have a net impact of reduced travel delays, reduced vehicular trips, reduced vehicle trip length, and measures to improve the efficiency of travel. Additionally, on November 7, 2014, the City of Naples adopted a resolution to support the Southwest Florida Blue Zones Project. The Southwest Florida Blue Zones Project works with community leaders to inspire positive sustainable changes to policy and the built-environment to improve the well-being among the community. Such infrastructure as sidewalks and bike lanes improve the ability of community members to move naturally, connect socially, and access healthy food. The following policy constraints are noted in the City of Marco Island Comprehensive Plan (City of Marco Island 2000) Transportation Element amended December 7, 2009: • Maintain designated LOS for arterial, collector, and local roads on Marco Island. Marco Island’s adopted LOS reflect generalized maximum daily volumes as derived from peak hour traffic conditions: – Arterials: LOS D (except County Road [CR] 951 from the Jolley Bridge to CR 92—LOS C) – Collectors: LOS D – Local Roads: LOS D Finally, environmental constraints include conservation lands in the northeastern and southeastern parts of the County, wetlands, threatened and endangered species habitat, and primary and secondary canal systems throughout the County. The 2045 Needs Plan incorporates all transportation modes, including roadway needs for motorists and freight, transit, bicycle, and walking or using a mobility device. The following sections detail the County needs for projects related to these transportation modes as well as technologies, such as ITS and CAV. This chapter breaks down the 2045 Needs Plan by Roadway Needs, Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs, and Transit Needs. 4-2 Roadway Needs The initial approach to developing the list of roadway project needs included a review of the following plans: • Collier MPO 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan, Amended May 25, 2018, and September 9, 2016 • Collier MPO Transportation Improvement Program FY 2021 – FY 2025 (Adopted June 12, 2020) • Collier MPO Transportation System Performance Report & Action Plan Draft Baseline Report (2020) • Collier MPO Transportation System Performance Report & Action Plan Draft Action Plan (2020) • Collier MPO Congestion Management Process 2017 Update • Collier 2040 LRTP Freight Congestion Considerations Technical Memorandum • Collier MPO 2040 Long Range Transit Element, November 2015 • Collier MPO Local Road Safety Plan, 2020 • Collier MPO Transit Development Plan Major Update, 2020 • Collier Area Transit (CAT) Transit Development Plan FY 2019 Annual Progress Report 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-5 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan • Collier MPO Park and Ride Study, 2020 • Collier County Annual Update & Inventory Report/Capital Improvement Element Schedule Update on Public Facilities, November 2019 • Collier County Community Housing Plan, October 24, 2017 • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Sea Level Rise Viewer • Adaptation of Coastal Urban and Natural Ecosystems (ACUNE) (pending) • Collier County Transportation Capital Improvement Program, 2019 • Collier County Airport Authority Immokalee Regional Airport, Airport Layout Plan Update, August 2017 • City of Naples Airport Authority, Naples Airport Master Plan, February 29, 2020 • FDOT Five Year Work Program 2021 – 2025 (Adopted July 1, 2020) • FDOT Strategic Intermodal System 2029 – 2045 Long Range Cost Feasible Plan • FDOT Strategic Intermodal System Funding Strategy First Five Year Plan Multi-Modal FY 2020/2021 through FY 2024/2025 • FDOT Strategic Intermodal System Funding Strategy Second Five Year Plan Multi-Modal FY 2025/2026 through FY 2029/2030 • FDOT Freight Mobility and Trade Plan, April 2020 • FDOT Guidance for Assessing Planning Impacts and Opportunities of Automated, Connected, Electric and Shared-Use Vehicles, September 2018 • University of South Florida Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) Autonomous Vehicle (AV) and Alternative Fuel Vehicle (AFV) Florida Market Penetration Rate and VMT Assessment Study, October 2019. • U.S. Department of Transportation Preparing for the Future of Transportation: Automated Vehicles 3.0, October 2018 Additional approaches to developing the Needs Plan included collaboration with regional partners including the Lee County MPO for consistency between long-range plans and the District 1 travel model, coordination with the Collier County Transportation Traffic and Planning Divisions, scenario planning analysis, travel demand modeling, tribal coordina- tion, and soliciting and incorporating public input. Further, several coordination meetings with the TAC and CAC were held during the development of the Needs Plan. Existing Plus Committed Projects As described in Chapter 2, the initial list of project needs was developed by first modeling the E+C travel network. The E+C network includes all new road or capacity projects that have been implemented since 2015 (existing), plus all projects that have construction funded through Fiscal Year 2023. The E+C characterizes the transportation network expected to be in place by the year 2023 (constructed or funded for con- struction). Figure 4-2 and Table 4-1 present the E+C roadway projects in graphic and tabular formats, respectively. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-6 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan FDOT modeled the E+C travel network using the D1RPM travel demand model and the 2045 socioeconomic data discussed in Chapter 2. The modeling result helped identify deficiencies in the roadway network and showed which roadway segments were expected to be congested in 2045 if no further improvements were made to the surrounding network. Congestion was measured using the ratio of the forecasted traffic volume in Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) to the capacity of the roadway segment (at LOS D), referred to as the volume to capacity (V/C) ratio. A roadway is considered over capacity if the V/C ratio greater than 1.0. Figure 4-3 presents the anticipated roadway congestion in 2045 if no improvements to the network are made beyond the E+C projects. The roadway facilities predicted to experience high (V/C = 1.15 to 1.5) and significant (V/C > 1.5) levels of congestion in 2045 are listed in the following text. 2045 Facilities with High Degree of Congestion (V/C = 1.15 to 1.5) • US 41 north of Immokalee Road • Immokalee Road east of Airport Road N • Immokalee Road east of I-75 • Immokalee Road west of I-75 • Immokalee Road east of Collier Boulevard to Randall Boulevard • Immokalee Road north of Stockade Road • Immokalee Road from SR 29 to Camp Keas Road • Randall Boulevard east of 8th Street NE • Oil Well Road between Everglades Boulevard and Oil Well Grade Road • SR 29 north of Westclox Road • Everglades Boulevard north of Oil Well Road • Pine Ridge Road east of Livingston Road • Old 41 Road east of US 41/Tamiami Trail to Lee County • Vanderbilt Beach Road west of US 41 • Intersection at Collier Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway • Collier Boulevard north of Golden Gate Parkway • Santa Barbara Boulevard north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road • Park Shore Drive west of Clayton Road • I-75 north of Immokalee Road • Intersection at I-75 and Immokalee Road • Intersection at I-75 and Pine Ridge Road • Intersection at I-75 and Golden Gate Parkway 2045 Facilities with a Significant Degree of Congestion (V/C >1.5) • Collier Boulevard north of Pine Ridge Road • Golden Gate Boulevard from east of 16th Street SE to Everglades Boulevard • SR 29 (N 15th Street) at the intersection of Westclox Road 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-7 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Figure 4-2. 2045 Existing Plus Committed (E+C) Project Map 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-8 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-1. 2045 Existing Plus Committed (E+C) Projects Map ID Roadway From To Improvement Agency or Municipality Included in 2021-2025 TIP? Existing (2015–2019) 19 I-75 North of SR 951 Golden Gate Pkwy Widen from Four to Six Lanes FDOT FPN: 406313-4 N/A 20 SR 951 Manatee Road North of Tower Rd Widen from Two to Four Lanes FDOT FPN: 435111-2 N/A 21 City Gate Blvd. Extension White Lake Blvd. East of Brennan Dr New Four-Lane Facility Collier County N/A 22 Golden Gate Blvd. Wilson Blvd. Everglades Blvd. Widen from Two to Four Lanes Collier County N/A 23 Logan Blvd. North of Immokalee Rd. Lee County Line New Two-Lane Facility Collier County N/A 24 Massey St./Woodcrest Dr. Calusa Pines Dr. Immokalee Rd. New Two-Lane Facility Collier County N/A 25 Pristine Dr. Wolfe Rd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd New Two-Lane Facility Collier County N/A 26 Tree Farm Rd. Davila St Massey St New Two-Lane Facility Collier County N/A 51 I-75 Golden Gate Parkway SB Off Ramp - Interchange Improvements FDOT FPN: 429907-1 N/A 53 SR 29 Jefferson Avenue 9th Street Add Turn Lanes FDOT FPN: 431390-2 N/A 54 SR 82 Corkscrew Road - Add Turn Lanes FDOT FPN: 433175-1 N/A 55 Airport Pulling Rd. North Horseshoe Dr. - Intersection Improvements Collier County N/A 56 Golden Gate Pkwy. Livingston Rd. - Intersection Improvements Collier County N/A 57 Pine Ridge Rd. US 41 - Intersection Improvements Collier County N/A 70 8th Street Bridge New Bridge Collier County N/A 79 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Gulf Pavilion Dr. US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) Constrained to Four Lanes Collier County N/A 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-9 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-1. 2045 Existing Plus Committed (E+C) Projects Map ID Roadway From To Improvement Agency or Municipality Included in 2021-2025 TIP? Committed (2019–2023) 29 Airport Pulling Rd.a Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Immokalee Rd. Widen from Four to Six Lanes Collier County Yes 30 Randall Blvd. Immokalee Rd. 8th St. Widen from Two to Four Lanes Collier County Yes 32 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension a Collier Blvd. Curry Canal Widen from Two to Six Lanes Collier County Yes 33 Veterans Memorial Blvd. Old US 41 Secoya Reserve Cir New Four-Lane Facility Collier County Yes 34 Veterans Memorial Blvd. Secoya Reserve Cir Strand Blvd. Widen from Two to Four Lanes Collier County Yes 35 Whippoorwill Lane Pine Ridge Rd. Stratford Ln. Widen from Two to Four Lanes Collier County Yes 36 SR 82 Gator Slough Lane SR 29 Widen from Two to Four Lanes FDOT FPN: 430849-1 Yes 37 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension a Curry Canal Wilson Blvd. New Four-Lane Facility Collier County Yes 38 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension a Wilson Blvd. 16th St. New Two-Lane Facility Expandable to Four Lanes Collier County Yes 58 US 41 Oasis Visitor Center - Add Left-Turn Lane FDOT FPN: 441975-1 Yes 59 Immokalee Rd. Woodcrest Dr. - Intersection Improvements Collier County Yes 60 Pine Ridge Rd.a Livingston Rd. - Intersection Improvements Collier County Yes 61 Randall Blvd.a Immokalee Rd. - Intersection Improvements Collier County Yes 62 Triangle Blvd.a Celeste Dr. - Roundabout Implementation Collier County Yes 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-10 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-1. 2045 Existing Plus Committed (E+C) Projects Map ID Roadway From To Improvement Agency or Municipality Included in 2021-2025 TIP? 63 10th St. 5th Ave North - Roundabout Implementation City of Naples Yes 64 3rd Ave. South 8th St. South - Roundabout Implementation City of Naples Yes 67 Mooring Line Dr. Crayton Rd. - Roundabout Implementation City of Naples Yes 71 16th Street Bridge 16th St. 16th St. New Bridge Collier County Yes 73 Crayton Rd. Harbour Dr. - Roundabout Implementation City of Naples Yes 75 Price St.a Waterford Dr. - Roundabout Implementation Collier County Yes 100 Wilson Blvd. Golden Gate Blvd. Immokalee Rd. Widen from Two to Four Lanes Collier County Yes 101 I-75 Pine Ridge Rd. Interchange Improvement FDOT FPN: 445296-2 Yes 102 Corkscrew Rd. N. Wildcat Dr. E. of Wildcat Dr. Widen and Resurface Collier County Yes 103 Pine Ridge Rd. Livingston Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Collier County Yes 104 Santa Barbara Blvd. Green Blvd. Minor Intersection Improvement Collier County Yes Sources: FDOT Collier County Five Year Work Program FY 2019-2023, Collier County AUIR Five Year Work Program FY 2019-2023, Collier County One-Cent Sales Surtax Website a Collier One-Cent Sales Surtax Transportation Project Note: FPN = Financial Project Number 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-11 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Figure 4-3. 2045 E+C Travel Network Congestion Map 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-12 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Other Roadway Needs Considerations Once the initial list of roadway projects needs was developed based on the E+C roadway deficiency modeling, other roadway-related needs data were evaluated to develop a more comprehensive project needs list. Considerations included review of existing planning studies, freight needs, and congestion management strategies, which included safety issues and Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O). Existing Planning Studies The MPO reviewed the existing County planning studies described below to identify potential projects eligible for the roadway Needs Plan. These studies were recently completed or are currently underway. Randall Boulevard/Oil Well Road Study Area The County completed a corridor study to evaluate potential roadway network improvements near Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road. The study evaluated several corridor alterna- tives to enhance traffic operations and safety conditions based on current and future travel demands. On May 14, 2019, the Collier BCC voted to approve the staff recom- mendation to expand Randall Boulevard (between 8th Street and Everglades Boulevard) to six lanes, Randall Boulevard (between Everglades Boulevard and Desoto Boulevard) to four lanes, and Everglades Boulevard (between Oil Well Road and Randall Boulevard) to four lanes. CR 951 Congestion Relief Study This study is intended to identify an alternative travel route to the existing CR 951 (Collier Boulevard) corridor because of forecasted high congestion levels by 2045. The preliminary study area extends east of CR 951 from City Gate Boulevard North at its northern limit to Benfield Road on its eastern limit and to US 41 at its southern limits. Potential alternative solutions include multiple travel routes, improvements to CR 951, a no-build option, and evaluation of other alternative planning strategies to alleviate future congestion on CR 951. Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study The Immokalee Road (CR 846) Corridor Congestion Study is evaluating the future levels of congestion along the Immokalee Road Corridor between Livingston Road and Logan Boulevard. Potential improvements will be considered at the main intersections along the corridor which include: • Conventional “At-Grade” Improvements (widening) • Continuous Flow Intersections • Jug Handle • Single Point Urban Interchange • Restricted Crossing U-Turn • Diverging Diamond Interchange at I-75 The study is expected to be completed in the spring of 2021. East of CR 951 Bridge Reevaluation Study In August 2008, the County conducted the East of CR 951 Infrastructure and Services Horizon Study to evaluate missing bridge connections based on system-wide infrastructure needs that considered transportation circulation, access management, schools, parks, law enforcement, emergency services, fire, libraries, storm water management, and public utilities. The study’s stakeholders identified 12 preferred canal crossing locations and ranked the bridges based on criteria related to mobility, service efficiency, and emergency response. The new bridges would be strategically located throughout the Golden Gate Estates area to reduce trip lengths and travel demand on already congested collector roadways and to provide the greatest opportunity to reduce response time for first responders. In 2018, County voters approved a 1-cent 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-13 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan infrastructure surtax that included specifically earmarked funding for constructing the new bridges. In 2019, the County completed construction of a new bridge on 8th Street with funding from FDOT. The County has also programmed construction of a new bridge on 16th Street in the Five Year Work Program with funds from the infra- structure surtax proceeds. The surtax funds will be available to construct the remaining 10 bridges within the next 7 years. The remaining 10 bridges are the subject of the 2020 East of CR 951 Bridge Reevaluation Study, which is being performed to reconfirm the validity of the remaining 10 recommended bridge locations before moving the remaining bridge projects into production. Table 4-2 presents the bridge locations. Table 4-2. East of CR 951 Bridge Reevaluation Study Bridges Map IDa New Bridge Projects 81 47th Ave. NE (between Immokalee Rd. & Everglades Blvd.) 82 Wilson Blvd. N (south of 33rd Ave NE) 83 18th Ave. NE (between Wilson Ave & 8th St. NE) 84 18th Ave. NE (between 8th St. NE & 16th St. NE) 85 North End of 13th St. NW (north of Golden Gate Blvd.) 86 16th St. SE (south of Golden Gate Blvd.) 87 10th Ave. SE (between Everglades Blvd. and Desoto Blvd.) 88 Wilson Blvd. S (south of Golden Gate Blvd.) 89 62nd Ave. NE (between Everglades Blvd. and 40th St. NE) 115 23rd St. SW (south of Golden Gate Blvd.) a Refer to Figure 4-9 Freight The Collier Freight Network is defined in the Collier MPO 2040 LRTP Freight Congestion Considerations Technical Memorandum (Renaissance Planning 2015) as including limited-access facilities, regional freight mobility corridors, and freight distribution routes. Collier County’s freight transportation network system consists of numerous freight mobility corridors and freight distribution routes that support the state and regional economy. Rail access to the County is limited to a 1-mile section of the Seminole Gulf Railway in the far northwest corner of the County. In addition to providing traditional rail freight transportation, the rail line supplies regional trucking and logistical services, as well as warehousing and distribution from its distribution center located in North Fort Myers. Review of truck traffic volumes in the FDOT Florida Traffic Online site (FDOT 2020g) reveals that volumes are greatest along the portion of I-75 north of Immokalee Road where trucks comprise more than 8 percent of total AADT. Truck traffic volumes show that this section has daily truck volumes exceeding 8,500 per day. The portion of I-75 between Pine Ridge Road and north of Immokalee Road has truck volumes exceeding 7,500 per day and trucks make up between 8 to 10 percent of the total AADT. Along SR 29 south of I-75, truck volumes make up 26 percent of the total AADT. However, the total traffic volumes along this segment are low compared to other areas in the County. Limited-Access Facilities I-75 is the only limited-access facility within the County and is a major element of the Florida SIS. It serves as the primary transportation facility connecting Collier County with its immediate neighboring counties, the rest of Florida, and the National Highway System. It also serves as a major commuter corridor. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-14 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Regional Freight Mobility Corridors The regional freight mobility corridors function as connectors between limited-access facilities and regional freight activity centers. Within the County, the regional freight mobility corridors consist of: • SR 29 (I-75 to Hendry County Line) • SR 82 (SR 29 to Hendry County Line) • SR 84/Davis Boulevard (US 41 to I-75) • US 41 (SR 84/Davis Boulevard to Lee County Line) Freight Distribution Routes Freight distribution routes serve to distribute truck traffic to local delivery areas. These include state roadways and other local roadways designated in local truck route ordinances at the county and municipal levels. The freight distribution routes within the County consist of: • SR 29 (US 41 to I-75) • CR 951/Collier Boulevard (Marco Island to US 41) • CR 951/Collier Boulevard (US 41 to CR 846/Immokalee Road) • CR 858/Oil Well Road (CR 846/Immokalee Road to SR 29) • CR 846/Immokalee Road (US 41 to SR 29) • Golden Gate Boulevard (CR 951/Collier Boulevard to DeSoto Boulevard) • CR 896/Pine Ridge Road (US 41 to CR 951/Collier Boulevard) • US 41 (SR 84/Davis Boulevard to Dade County Line) • Old US 41 (US 41 to Lee County Line) Freight Activity Centers The northwestern portion of the County has been identified in the FDOT Freight Mobility and Trade Plan (FDOT 2020b) as a low to medium freight activity hotspot within Florida. These hotspots distribute or attract large amounts of freight activities and have a significant impact on Florida’s transportation system and economy. There are two types of freight activity centers (FACs) located in the County: primary and secondary (refer to Figure 4-4). Primary FACs are large industrial and manufacturing areas that send or receive freight in large quantities or for further distribution to the consumer market. Secondary FACs include significant mining and agricultural operations, which sometimes have intermittent or seasonal demands. There are five primary and four secondary FACs within the County. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-15 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Figure 4-4. Freight Network and Activity Centers 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-16 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan While the Old US 41 Industrial area has limited rail service, it is the only FAC in the County with the potential for intermodal rail activities and should be preserved for future freight- related development as economic conditions warrant. Additionally, a 60-acre zone in and around the Immokalee Airport is designated as a Foreign Trade Zone (Collier County 2020b). With convenient access to SIS facilities including SR 29, SR 82, and I-75, the Immokalee Airport is well-suited for existing and future intermodal air-cargo/truck activities. Congestion Management The Collier MPO is federally mandated to implement a Congestion Management Process (FHWA 2020). A CMP is developed to improve traffic flow and safety conditions. As discussed in Chapter 1, the Collier MPO CMC is responsible for creating and amending the CMP and for prioritizing candidate congestion management projects to be funded with federal and state funding. As presented on Figure 4-5, the CMP is a detailed eight-step process that an urban area follows to improve the performance of its transportation system by reducing the negative impacts of traffic congestion. The Collier MPO Transportation System Performance Report (TSPR) and Action Plan Baseline Condition Report (Tindale Oliver 2020a) provides an evaluation of existing and future congestion issues in the County and associated municipalities. Figure 4-6 presents congestion hot spot locations in the County that were assessed for congestion management strategies in the TSPR. The hot spot locations were sorted into three tiers to identify which of the hot spot locations had the most causes of congestion. Tier 1 represents road segments influenced by three or more congestion causes, Tier 2 represents road segments influenced by two congestion causes, and Tier 3 in represents road segments influenced by one congestion cause. Sources of congestion included school congestion, safety, V/C ratio, speed, and public comments. Figure 4-5. Congestion Management Process Eight-Step Framework 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-17 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Figure 4-6. TSPR Congestion Hot Spot Locations 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-18 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Safety Issues The Collier MPO TSPR and Action Plan Baseline Condition Report, along with the Collier MPO Local Road Safety Plan companion study, further identified the top intersection and roadway segment crash locations that were based on an analysis of the top 20 highest frequency and 20 highest rate locations of crashes between 2014 and 2018. Table 4-3 presents the top roadway segments crash locations. In the 2020 CMP update process, new CMP strategies were identified and added to the existing strategies list based on the analysis conducted in the TSPR Baseline Condition Report, which identified causes and locations of congested corridors, and the TSPR and Action Plan, Action Plan (Tindale Oliver 2020b), which analyzed and identified congestion mitigation strategies for the specific corridors. A major addition to these congestion mitigation strategies involved safety strategies that included: • Signage and pavement markings (e.g., special emphasis crosswalks, yield/stop for pedestrian signs, advanced street signs) • Visibility and sightline improvements • New and upgraded street lighting • Traffic control devices (for example, left-turn signals, variable message signs, pedestrian hybrid beacons) • New and upgraded existing bicycle and pedestrian crossings The mapping analysis of crash data from 2014 to 2018 for the LRTP update is presented in Appendix C. The map presents total crash locations between 2014 to 2018, as well as crash locations where a fatality by vehicle, including a pedestrian, or bicyclist occurred. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-19 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-3. TSPR Top Road Segment Crash Locations (2014–2018) On Street From Street To Street Total Crashes Length (miles) AADT Crash Ratea Top 20 Crash Frequencyb or Rate Location Golden Gate Pkwy Santa Barbara Blvd. Collier Blvd. 559 2.21 27,496 5.048 Both I 75 Broward County Line SR 29 470 29.13 22,000 0.402 Frequency Airport Rd. Pine Ridge Rd. Orange Blossom Dr. 455 1.45 34,686 4.943 Both Tamiami Trail East Airport Rd. Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 453 1.69 47,814 3.074 Frequency Airport Rd. Radio Rd. Golden Gate Pkwy. 405 1.43 44,008 3.534 Both Immokalee Rd. I 75 Logan Blvd. 402 1.37 38,245 4.210 Both Tamiami Trail North Immokalee Rd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. 396 1.51 35,925 4.005 Both Golden Gate Blvd. Collier Blvd. Wilson Blvd. 381 5.03 25,481 1.630 Frequency I 75 SR 29 SR 951 366 21.23 24,970 0.378 Frequency Immokalee Rd. Livingston Rd. I 75 355 0.71 46,874 5.886 Both Pine Ridge Rd. Livingston Rd. I 75 351 0.95 52,322 3.869 Both I 75 Pine Ridge Rd. Immokalee Rd. 331 4.27 35,295 1.203 Frequency Immokalee Rd Logan Blvd. Collier Blvd. 331 1.94 89,362 1.048 Frequency Golden Gate Pkwy. Livingston Rd. I 75 293 2.05 42,756 1.835 Frequency Davis Blvd. Lakewood Blvd. County Barn Rd. 291 1.68 28,243 3.359 Frequency Airport Rd Golden Gate Pkwy. Pine Ridge Rd. 290 2.59 46,556 1.316 Frequency Tamiami Trail East Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. Treetops Dr. 280 2.45 37,428 1.674 Frequency I 75 Immokalee Rd. Lee County Line 278 3.06 99,582 0.501 Frequency 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-20 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-3. TSPR Top Road Segment Crash Locations (2014–2018) On Street From Street To Street Total Crashes Length (miles) AADT Crash Ratea Top 20 Crash Frequencyb or Rate Location Immokalee Rd. Collier Blvd. Wilson Blvd. 271 5.10 29,259 0.995 Frequency Tamiami Trail North 12th Ave N Goodlette Rd. S 269 1.66 51,500 1.727 Frequency Radio Rd. Livingston Rd. Santa Barbara Blvd. 250 1.99 18,398 3.742 Rate Santa Barbara Blvd. Golden Gate Pkwy. Green Blvd. 215 1.71 20,314 3.391 Rate Airport Rd. Davis Blvd. North Rd. 198 0.52 43,551 4.819 Rate Collier Blvd. Golden Gate Pkwy. Green Blvd. 177 1.04 27,271 3.420 Rate Pine Ridge Rd. Goodlette-Frank Road Shirley St. 165 0.67 36,418 3.733 Rate Immokalee Rd. Stockade Rd. SR 29 157 1.52 6,949 8.155 Rate Lake Trafford Rd. Carson Rd. SR 29 93 1.00 8,650 5.874 Rate Immokalee Drive N 29th St. Charlotte St. 91 1.97 6,200 4.074 Rate a Crash rate expressed as the number of crashes per 100 million vehicle miles of travel (AADT x Length) for the 5-year reporting period. b Frequency is defined as the number of crashes occurring within a specific jurisdiction, on a roadway segment, or at an intersection. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-21 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Transportation System Management and Operations The combination of technology and operational strategies is called TSM&O. These multimodal strategies are designed to maximize the efficiency, safety and use of existing and planned transportation infrastructure. TSM&O include Transportation System Management (TSM) approaches and ITS technologies that are noted in the Collier MPO Congestion Management Process 2017 Update (Adopted October 13, 2017) (Collier MPO 2017) as effective strategies to mitigate congestion. TSM strategies are a low-cost but effective way to reduce congestion particularly for: • Intersection and signal improvements • Special events management strategies • Incident management ITS projects are effective in maximizing a transportation system’s efficiency. Based on the Collier MPO CMP 2017 Update, candidate ITS projects in Collier County include: • Those which are consistent with FDOT’s current ITS Regional Architecture • Updates to existing equipment and software deployed in the region • Improved incident management • Enhancements to City of Naples, Collier County Traffic Operations/Management Centers (TOCs), including studies and implementing their recommendations • Improved use of social media and public information technologies Further, the 2017 CMP Update noted the following ITS performance measures: • Maintaining concurrency with FDOT Regional ITS Architecture and technological advances in TOC equipment and operations • Increased number of signalized intersections connected to ITS • Improved Travel Time Reliability Within Collier MPO’s jurisdiction, both the City of Naples and Collier County manage TOCs in close coordination with each other and with FDOT to remain in full compliance with the FDOT Statewide ITS architecture. The 2020 CMP update identified several roadway facilities as candidates for ITS and active roadway management strategies. Figure 4-7 summarizes the projects and associated recom- mendations along with projects adopted in the FY 2021–FY 2025 TIP (refer to Appendix D). While these projects are part of the roadway needs, the LRTP- level modeling software (D1RPM) is not sensitive enough to determine if congestion is relieved through implementation of these strategies. Evaluation and prioritization of these projects is conducted by the MPO CMC using Strategy Evaluation Criteria that are used to screen project submittals for consistency with CMP goals, strategies, and congestion hotspots identified in the TSPR Baseline Condition Report (refer to Figure 4-6). 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-22 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Figure 4-7. 2019 and 2020 CMP ITS/Active Roadway Management Projects 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-23 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Both the Congestion Management Process and the bicycle/ pedestrian planning process strongly consider crash data as an important component of the project identification and selection process. As improvements are made to these facilities, special attention is placed on identifying solutions that enhance safety for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Traffic crashes are highly correlated with intersection locations, and consideration of operational and ITS improvements to major and minor intersections will address many of the high crash locations. Input from the LRTP into those continuing processes provides valuable guidance in the identification of safety-related improvements. Ranking the Roadway Needs Once a comprehensive list of the roadway project needs was developed, they were evaluated by scoring each project using defined goals and objectives, and the evaluation criteria described in Chapter 3. The evaluation provided a score for each project that was used to rank the needs projects from highest to lowest. During the process, adjustments were made to the rankings as more testing was done, or as information about projects schedules and commitments became known. Several projects were removed from the needs list and moved to the E+C category based on agency expectations that projects would be completed before the 2023–2045 planning timeframe. Projects were deleted if modeling indicated that they would not be beneficial. The following subsections provide further details on the evaluation criteria scoring presented in Chapter 3. Ad- ditionally, it describes other considerations when evaluating the projects including natural environment impacts and mitigation strategies, risks to the transportation system due to climate change, and future technology impacts to the transportation system including CAV. Environmental Considerations Transportation projects can significantly impact many aspects of the natural environment including wildlife and their habitats, wetlands, and groundwater resources. Where impacts cannot be completely avoided, impacts minimization, mitigation or conservation efforts are required. The Collier MPO is committed to principals of environmental stewardship and carefully examines potential impacts and mitigation efforts for each project under consideration. Environmental mitigation for transportation projects in the Collier Metropolitan Area is completed through a partnership between the Collier MPO, its member jurisdictions, FDOT, state and federal environmental resource and regulatory agencies, and environmental preservation organizations. Environmental mitigation is the process of addressing damage to the environment caused by transportation projects or programs. The process of mitigation is best accomplished through enhancement, restoration, creation, or preservation projects that help offset unavoidable environmental impacts. These activities are directed through Section 373, F.S., which establishes the requirements for mitigation planning as well as the requirements for permitting, mitigation banking, and mitigation requirements for habitat impacts. Impacts to habitat can be mitigated through a variety of options, which include mitigation banks and mitigation through the Water Management District(s) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-24 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-4 lists environmental mitigation strategies that are considered when addressing environmental impacts from future projects. Table 4-4. Mitigation Strategies Resource/Impacts Potential Mitigation Strategy Wetlands and Water Resources • Restore degraded wetlands • Create new wetland habitats • Enhance or preserve existing wetlands • Improve stormwater management • Purchase credits from a mitigation bank Forested and Natural Areas • Use selective cutting and clearing • Replace or restore forested areas • Preserve existing vegetation Habitats • Construct underpasses, such as culverts • Implement other design measures to minimize potential fragmenting of animal habitats Streams • Perform stream restoration • Create vegetative buffer zones • Enforce strict erosion and sedimentation control measures Threatened or Endangered Species • Preservation • Enhance or restore degraded habitat • Create new habitats • Establish buffer areas around existing habitat As part of the ranking process, an evaluation of the potential impacts to wildlife, habitat, and wetlands was conducted for each project in the needs network. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory database and their panther habitat maps served as a source to estimate the amount of environmental impacts for each project. Impacts to habitat and wetlands were reflected by giving a negative score for each impact, ranging from -1 (least negative impact) to -5 (most negative impact). Projects were scored based on their degree of impact to panther habitat and wetland impacts. The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Update Project Cost Development Methodology Technical Memorandum (provided under separate cover) details how panther habitat and wetland impacts were estimated as well as the costs associated with potential mitigation. In addition to the process outlined in the Florida Statutes and implemented by the MPO and its partner agencies, the FDOT Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) process is used to seek input on individual qualifying long-range transportation projects allowing for more specific com- mentary. This ensures that mitigation opportunities are identified, considered, and available as the LRTP is developed and projects are advanced. The ETDM screening process was applied to all qualifying projects identified in the 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan, which further provided opportunity to engage on any sociocultural impacts as well. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 870 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-25 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Climate Change Vulnerability and Risks Southwest Florida contains the largest area of tidally influenced public lands in the Gulf of Mexico and the fastest growing urban landscape in Florida. Both the human and natural components of the ecosystem are under increasing risk because of the threats of a growing human population, sea level rise (SLR), and tropical cyclones. While all MPOs in Florida will be challenged with extreme change in weather events, each MPO’s challenge is unique. Changing conditions can include increased inland flooding, SLR, increased frequency of severe storms with high winds and greater rainfall, increased duration of droughts and rapidly spreading fires, and economic recessions. These conditions will lead to more rapid degradation and decreased functional operability (or lifespan) of transportation facilities. The Collier MPO along with its partnering agencies are considering the unique challenges they face to better plan for ways to protect and preserve their infrastructure. Federal Regulation 23 CFR 450.306(b)(9) requires MPOs, in cooperation with the state and public transportation operators, to “improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation” in the long-range transportation planning process. Planning for resilience involves considering objectives and strategies in other planning areas, as shown on Figure 4-8. Figure 4-8. Resiliency Planning Considerations Source: FDOT 2020a To better understand planning needs and potential actions to mitigate SLR, the County, City of Naples, City of Marco Island, and City of Everglades teamed with Florida Gulf Coast University and the University of Florida to sponsor a grant application from the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science [a subsidiary of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)] for a 3-year study and modeling exercise related to the impacts of SLR and storm surge on Collier County. The Board approved a Resolution of Support for the project on September 13, 2016, and the NOAA grant was awarded. The ACUNE project (NOAA 2020b) began in June 2017 to develop a decision-support tool to aid resource managers, municipalities, and agencies in Collier County with decisions related to the preservation and restoration of 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 871 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-26 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan mangrove, marsh, and beach habitats; water management; and coastal planning, zoning, and land acquisition. However, the study was delayed because of the COVID-19 pandemic. A future LRTP update will include the results of the study and adjustments to the needs or cost feasible projects will be made as necessary. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Collier County Coastal Storm Risk Management Feasibility Study (USACE 2020), which began in October 2018 and is expected to be complete by September 2021, is developing, analyzing, and evaluating coastal storm risk management alternatives for the North Collier County (including Naples) and Marco Island study areas (covering both Gulf-facing shorelines and inland bay areas). The study divided the County into 6 primary planning reaches based on hydrologic boundaries and existing County project limits (reference Figure 4-9). The study references NOAA’s prediction that SLR in the study area averages approximately 2.8 millimeters each year, and further estimates that SLR could be 0.14 feet to 0.78 feet (or 9.4 inches) between 2028 and 2077. The draft report was released on July 31, 2020, and presented a tentative resilience plan called a Tentatively Selected Plan that includes structural and nonstructural measures to reduce coastal storm risk and damage to the coastal areas of the County. Structural measures include six surge-barrier systems (miter and/or sluice gates), three tide gates (sluice gates), and three floodwalls, as well as approximately 9.5 miles of beach and dune fill. Nonstructural measures include acquisition and elevation of residential structures and floodproofing of commercial structures and critical infrastructure. The total 1 https://coast.noaa.gov/slr/#/layer/slr project cost is estimated at $4.8 billion and would take 50 years to complete. Figure 4-9. USACE Collier County Coastal Storm Risk Management Feasibility Study Planning Reaches Source: USACE 2020 For the purposes of the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update, the NOAA Sea Level Rise Viewer (version 3.0.0)1 tool was used to evaluate potential climate impacts to the Collier Metropolitan Area transportation network. The viewer provides a pre- 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 872 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-27 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan liminary look at SLR and coastal flooding impacts. The tool is for screening-level evaluations and uses best-available, nationally consistent data sets and analyses. The SLR viewer can be used at several scales to help estimate impacts and prioritize actions for different scenarios. While the data and maps provided by the tool illustrate the scale of potential flooding, the exact location of SLR and flooding is an estimate. One area already experiencing the impacts of SLR is Goodland Drive (CR 92A) between Goodland and the City of Marco Island. Because of its low elevation, the existing roadway is frequently flooded during peak tides and storms, cutting off access to Goodland and damaging the pavement. Current mitigation strategies employed by the County include road raising and the addition of cross-drain pipes to allow tidal and storm flows to more easily pass from one side of the road to the other. For the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update, an intermediate high scenario was used to estimate SLR by 2045. Appendix C provides a map of potential SLR and coastal flooding by 2045. Projects that promote transportation infrastructure resiliency in the face of climate change and SLR were given a score of 5 if they were within 0.25 miles of potential 2045 flooding area and a score of 3 if they within 0.25 miles of a potential low lying area. The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Transportation Network’s Vulnerability to Climate Change White Paper (provided under separate cover) presents further details on climate change vulnerability and risk, estimation of SLR impacts, and possible mitigation strategies. Future Technology Considerations The FDOT Guidance for Assessing Planning Impacts and Opportunities of Automated, Connected, Electric and Shared-Use (ACES) Vehicles (FDOT 2018a) notes that Florida MPOs are dealing with an unprecedented amount of potential change as they plan for their transportation needs between now and 2045. Within their next planning horizon, MPOs need to decide how best to address the increasing deployment of ACES vehicles and complementary technologies. The Society of Automotive Engineers developed framework for Levels of Automation as well as definitions for terms related to driving automation systems. Automation Levels range from Level 0 to Level 5. Level 1 through Level 3 require a human driver, but have some varying degree of automation, such as adaptive cruise control or lane assist. Levels 4 and 5 do not require a human driver and are fully automated. Because emerging technologies have the potential to completely transform conventional transportation practices, it is important to understand the potential benefits and drawbacks of the various technologies. The key benefit to these emerging technologies is the potential to improve safety by reducing injuries and fatalities resulting from human error and distractions. However, ACES technologies also introduce a great deal of unknowns, such as costs, social inequities, and new planning requirements that make navigating policy difficult. Table 4-5 presents potential positive and negative effects from these emerging technologies as noted in the FDOT ACES Guidance. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 873 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-28 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-5. Potential Positive and Negative Effects Resulting from ACES Technologies Technology Potential Negative Effect(s) Potential Positive Effect(s) Automated Vehicles • Potential increase in VMT from empty vehicles • Changes in land use or urban form • Increased mobility for children, elderly or the disabled at potentially lower costs • Reduced parking demand • Changes in land use or urban form Connected Vehicles • Potential hacking of a transportation network • Potential increase in roadway capacities • New safety features • Improved congestion management Electric Vehicles • Decrease in transportation funding sources from reduction in motor fuel tax revenues • Potential reduction in air emissions (depending on energy sources used to generate electricity) Shared-Use Vehicles • Complete Street design challenges because of competition for limited curb space in urban areas • Opportunities for mobility hubs and new funding sources 2 Light Detection and Ranging The Florida Connected Vehicle Initiative includes multiple planning, design/implementation, and operational connected vehicle projects throughout the state (FDOT 2019d). While there are currently no projects or initiatives in Collier County, there is one project in neighboring Lee County: US 41 Florida’s Regional Advanced Mobility Elements (FRAME). The project is in the initial phases. The overall goal is to improve efficient operations of the traffic signals along the corridor, thereby improving mobility as well as provide information for connected vehicles. The project covers approximately 30 miles and 71 traffic signals and includes the following initiatives: • Traffic signal controllers/cabinets upgrades • Connected Vehicle Road Side Units deployment • Pedestrian detection using LIDAR2 detectors • Deployment of Automated Traffic Signal Performance Measures The 2045 LRTP includes multiple intersection projects along US 41 including at Immokalee Road, Goodlette-Frank Road, Collier Boulevard, Pine Ridge Road, and Golden Gate Parkway. Additionally, project no. 60 includes a study along a constrained portion of US 41 from Immokalee Road to Old US 41. All of these projects will benefit from lessons learned during the design and implementation of the FDOT-funded project to the north. For the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update, one CAV planning scenario was modeled by FDOT. As noted in FDOT’s Implementation of CAV into the D1RPM in Development of 2045 LRTP Updates White Paper (FDOT 2020h), vehicles with Level 3 automation may represent 30 to 60 percent of the vehicle fleet by 2035 (refer to Figure 4-10). The FDOT D1RPM 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 874 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-29 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Model Network included special-use lanes and ramps on I-75 in Lee and Collier counties. The CAV planning scenario assumed 35 percent of the vehicles on the MPO network were CAV and vehicle trips were separated into CAV and non-CAV trips. CAV trips were coded with special-use lanes that were used exclusively by CAV. The CAV scenario model output resulted in minor capacity improvements to the overall network in the Collier County area. Projects that consider CAV technology in the future and included technologies, such as ITS, Transit Signal Priority, etc., were given a score of 5. If they did not include technological improvements, they were scored 0. The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP ACES White Paper (provided under separate cover) presents further details on the future of CAV. 2045 Roadway Needs Results Figure 4-11 and Table 4-6 identify the 2045 roadway needs projects which total to more than $2.4 billion. The evaluation matrix for the ranking of the needs is presented in Appendix E. Figure 4-10. SAE Automation Levels Source: U.S. DOT (2018) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 875 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-30 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Figure 4-11. 2045 Needs Plan Project Map 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 876 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-31 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 1 51 Benfield Rd. Extension The Lords Way City Gate Blvd. N Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 2 41 Benfield Rd. US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) Rattlesnake Hammock Extension Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 3 72 Big Cypress Pkwy. Green Blvd. Golden Gate Blvd. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 4 70 Big Cypress Pkwy. Golden Gate Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 5 71 Big Cypress Pkwy. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension Oil Well Rd. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 6 82 Big Cypress Pkwy. Oil Well Rd. Immokalee Rd. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 7 62 Camp Keais Rd. Pope John Paul Blvd. Oil Well Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 8 80 Camp Keais Rd. Immokalee Rd. Pope John Paul Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 9 1 Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Golden Gate Main Canal Green Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Four to Six Lanes 10 21 CR 951 Extension Collier Blvd. (CR 951) (northern terminus) Lee/Collier County Line Roadway Capacity New 2-Lane Road 11 34 Everglades Blvd. Randall Blvd. South of Oil Well Road Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 877 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-32 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 12 35 Everglades Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension Randall Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 13 54 Everglades Blvd. Golden Gate Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 14 63 Everglades Blvd. I-75 (SR-93) Golden Gate Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 15 37 Golden Gate Blvd. Everglades Blvd. Desoto Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 16 58 Golden Gate Blvd. Extension Desoto Blvd. Big Cypress Pkwy. Roadway Capacity New Four-Lane Road 17 31 Goodlette-Frank Rd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Immokalee Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 18 66 Green Blvd. Santa Barbara Blvd./ Logan Blvd. Sunshine Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 19 27 Green Boulevard Extension (16th Ave. SW) 23rd St. SW Wilson Blvd. Extension Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane (Future Study Area) 20 33 Green Boulevard Extension (16th Ave. SW) Collier Blvd. (CR 951) 23rd St. SW Roadway Capacity New Four-Lane (Future Study Area) 21 42 Green Boulevard Extension (16th Ave. SW) Wilson Blvd. Ext Everglades Blvd. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road 22 60 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange Everglades Blvd. Interchange New Interchange 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-33 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 23 8 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange (modified) Golden Gate Pkwy. Interchange Interchange Improvement 24 2 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange (modified) Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Interchange Interchange Improvement 25 22 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange (modified) Immokalee Rd. Interchange Interchange improvement (DDI proposed) 27 40 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange (new) Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Interchange New Interchange - Partial (to/from the north) 29 5 I-75 (SR-93) Managed (Toll) Lanes Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Collier/Lee County Line Roadway Capacity New Ten-Lane Express (Toll) Lanes 30 7 Immokalee Rd. (CR 846) Camp Keais Rd. Carver St. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 31 23 CR 846 E SR 29 Airpark Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 32 81 Keane Ave. Inez Rd. Wilson Blvd. Extension Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Future Study Area) 33 50 Little League Rd. Extension SR 82 Westclox St. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road 34 65 Logan Blvd. Green Blvd. Pine Ridge Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Four to Six Lanes 35 52 Logan Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Immokalee Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 36 67 Logan Blvd. Pine Ridge Rd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 879 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-34 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 37 38 Oil Well Road/ CR 858 Everglades Blvd. Oil Well Grade Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Six Lanes 38 46 Oil Well Road/ CR 858 Ave Maria Entrance Camp Keais Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Six Lanes 39 10 Old US 41 US 41 (Tamiami Trail E) Lee/Collier County Line Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 40 45 Orange Blossom Drive Airport Pulling Rd. Livingston Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 41A 19 Randall Blvd. Intersection (flyover) Immokalee Rd. Interchange Ultimate Intersection Improvement: Overpass 41B 36 Randall Blvd. Immokalee Rd. 8th St. NE Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Six Lanes 42 39 Randall Blvd. 8th St. NE Everglades Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Six Lanes 43 59 Randall Blvd. Everglades Blvd. Desoto Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 44 61 Randall Blvd. Desoto Blvd. Big Cypress Pkwy. Roadway Capacity New Four-Lane Road 45 44 Santa Barbara Blvd. Painted Leaf Ln. Green Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Four to Six Lanes 46 56 SR 29 SR 82 Collier/Hendry Line Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 48 49 SR 29 I-75 (SR 93) Oil Well Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 880 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-35 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 50 24 SR 29 New Market Road North/Westclox Street North of SR 82 Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 51 13 SR 29/New Market Rd. W (New Road) CR 846 E New Market Rd. N Roadway Capacity New Four-Lane Road 52 3 SR 29 Agriculture Way CR 846 E Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 53 15 SR 29 Sunniland Nursery Rd. Agriculture Way Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 54 16 SR 29 Oil Well Rd. Sunniland Nursery Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 55 6 SR 84 (Davis Blvd.) Airport Pulling Rd. Santa Barbara Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Four to Six Lanes 56 9 Collier Blvd. (SR 951) South of Manatee Rd. North of Tower Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Four to Six Lanes 57 4 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersection Goodlette-Frank Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 58 12 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) Greenway Rd. 6 L Farm Rd Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 59 11 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersection Collier Blvd. (SR 951) Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 60 14 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) Immokalee Rd. Old US 41 Corridor Study Further Study Required 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-36 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 62A 73 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension 16th St. Everglades Blvd. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 62B 73 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension Everglades Blvd. Big Cypress Pkwy. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 63 53 Westclox Street Extension Little League Rd. West of Carson Rd. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road 65 32 Wilson Blvd. Keane Ave. Golden Gate Blvd. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 66 17 Immokalee Rd. (Intersection) Livingston Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 67 57 Veterans Memorial Blvd. Extension Strand Blvd. I-75 Roadway Capacity New Four-Lane Road 68 83 Big Cypress Pkwy. Intersection (new) Oil Well Grade Rd. Minor Intersection Improvement New At-Grade Intersection 70 68 Green Blvd. Extension Everglades Blvd. Big Cypress Pkwy. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road 73 20 Immokalee Rd. (CR 846) Intersection Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 74 28 Immokalee Rd. (CR 846) Intersection Wilson Blvd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 75 55 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange (new) Veterans Memorial Blvd. Interchange New Partial Interchange 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 882 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-37 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 76 43 Vanderbilt Dr. Immokalee Rd. Woods Edge Pkwy. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 78 29 Golden Gate Pkwy. Intersection Livingston Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 81 74 Bridge @ 47th Ave NE West of Everglades Blvd. New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 82 75 Bridge @ Wilson Blvd. South of 33rd Avenue NE New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 83 69 Bridge @ 18th Ave. NE Between Wilson Blvd. N and 8th St. NE New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 84 76 Bridge @ 18th Ave NE Between 8th St. NE and 16th St. NE New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 85 64 Bridge @ 13th St. NW North Terminus at Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 86 77 Bridge @ 16th St. SE South Terminus New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 87 77 Bridge @ Location TBD - between 10th Ave. SE and 20th Ave. SE East of Everglades Blvd. New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 88 48 Bridge @Wilson Blvd. S South Terminus New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 89 79 Bridge @ 62nd Ave NE West of 40th St NE New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 883 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-38 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 115 N/A Bridge @ 23rd St. SW South of Golden Gate Blvd. New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 90 26 Pine Ridge Rd. Logan Blvd. Collier Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Four to Six Lanes 92 N/A SR 82 Hendry County Line Gator Slough Ln. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 93 32 Immokalee Rd. Shady Hollow Blvd. E Rural Village Rd. (new) Roadway Capacity Widen from Two Four Lanes 94 57 Rural Village Rd. (new) Immokalee Rd. Immokalee Rd. Roadway Capacity New Four-Lane Road 95 N/A Golden Gate Pkwy. (Intersection) Goodlette-Frank Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 96 N/A Pine Ridge Rd. (Intersection) Airport Pulling Rd. Minor Intersection Improvement Minor intersection improvements 97 N/A Immokalee Rd. (Intersection) Logan Blvd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 98 N/A Vanderbilt Beach Rd. (Intersection) Livingston Rd. Minor Intersection Improvement Minor intersection improvements 99 N/A Vanderbilt Beach Rd. (Intersection) Logan Blvd. Minor Intersection Improvement Minor intersection improvements 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 884 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-39 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 100 N/A Collier Blvd. (Intersection) Pine Ridge Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 101 N/A Pine Ridge Rd. (Intersection) Goodlette-Frank Rd. Minor Intersection Improvement Minor intersection improvements 102 N/A US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersection Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 103 N/A US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersection Pine Ridge Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 104 N/A US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersection Golden Gate Pkwy. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 107 N/A Golden Gate Pkwy. Collier Blvd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 108 N/A Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Airport Pulling Rd. Minor Intersection Improvement Intersection Innovation/Improvements 109 N/A Immokalee Rd. Goodlette-Frank Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Intersection Innovation/Improvements 110 N/A Immokalee Rd. Airport Pulling Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Intersection Innovation/Improvements 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 885 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-40 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 111 N/A US 41 Immokalee Rd. Minor Intersection Improvement Intersection Innovation/Improvements 112 N/A Airport Pulling Rd. Orange Blossom Dr. Minor Intersection Improvement Intersection Innovation/Improvements 113 N/A Airport Pulling Rd. Golden Gate Pkwy. Minor Intersection Improvement Intersection Innovation/Improvements 114 N/A Airport Pulling Rd. Radio Rd. Minor Intersection Improvement Intersection Innovation/Improvements 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 886 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-41 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan 4-3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs Pathways that consist of pedestrian and bicycle facilities are an important part of the County’s transportation network. They facilitate access to public transportation and provide alternative mobility choices. In 2019, the Collier MPO and BPAC developed a Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) that addresses pedestrian and bicycle needs (Collier MPO 2019). The BPMP is incorporated in the LRTP by reference. The BPMP establishes policies for including bicycle and pedestrian facilities along all collector and arterial roads, formalizes the applicability of the Design Guidelines, adopts FDOT’s Complete Streets policy, identifies high priority Complete Streets Corridors, and establishes MPO priorities for funding improvements. The policies also commit MPO staff to reporting to the MPO Board on performance measures and targets on an annual basis. Vision, Goals, and Objectives The BPMP’s Vision, Goals, Objectives, and Strategies were developed with input from the MPO’s advisory committees, the BPMP stakeholders group, Collier MPO staff, and the consultant, and were vetted by the MPO Board. The Vision combines an emphasis on safety with creating a network for the community to use and enjoy: “To provide a safe and comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian network that promotes and encourages community use and enjoyment.” Goals and Strategies were developed by reviewing local, state, and national best practices and goals in similar plans including the Collier MPO 2012 Comprehensive Pathways Plan (RWA, Inc. 2012). The 2019 BPMP is similar to the 2012 Comprehensive Pathways Plan but places greater emphasis on safety, equity, and community health. The goals became the basis for the development of strategies, policies, and project prioritization criteria and are as follows: • Safety. Increase safety for people who walk and bicycle in the County. • Connectivity. Create a network of efficient, convenient bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the County. • Equity/Livability. Increase transportation choice and community livability through development of an integrated multimodal system. • Health. Increase total miles of bicycle and pedestrian facilities and encourage local governments to incorporate Complete Streets principles in road planning, design, and operations. • Economy. Promote tourism and economic opportunities by developing a safe, connected network of biking and walking facilities. • Environment. Protect the environment by promoting walking and bicycling for transportation to reduce congestion, reduce the need for costly expansion of road and highway systems, and reduce our nation’s dependence on foreign energy sources. To address the issue of equity in terms of providing equal access to bicycle and pedestrian facilities countywide, the MPO’s previous identification of Environmental Justice (EJ) communities was updated. The EJ criteria used for the BPMP were minority status, poverty, no access to a vehicle, and limited ability to speak English. EJ community areas were defined as areas where the criteria were 10 percent greater than the County average. The areas were ranked “Low”, “Medium”, “High”, or “Very High” based on how many EJ 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 887 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-42 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan factors overlapped within them. Appendix C presents the EJ Community Area map. Identification of Network Needs The BPMP developed bicycle and pedestrian priorities by first identifying gaps and needs on collector and arterial roads in the region using the following six-step identification process: 1. Plans Review – Review of local plans and documents that address bicycle and pedestrian issues and opportunities. Locally adopted plans and formal studies are incorporated by reference into the BPMP so that the projects identified within them are eligible for MPO funding. Examples include the City of Naples Downtown Circulation and Connectivity Plan, the Marco Island Bike Path Master Plan, and two plans currently in process: the Everglades City Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and the City of Naples Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan update. 2. Inventories – The Collier MPO entered into an agreement with the Naples Pathway Coalition (NPC) during the development of the BPMP to develop a joint bicycle facilities map in partnership with NPC and the City of Naples Community Services Department. Additionally, the Collier MPO’s 2017 bicycle and pedestrian facilities inventory maps were reviewed and commented on by local agencies, stakeholders, and the community through an extensive public outreach effort, resulting in multiple revisions of the map. The joint map was completed and published in November 2018. Going forward, NPC agreed to serve as the recipient of comments regarding the joint map’s accuracy, and the Collier MPO agreed to maintain and update the associated geographic information system (GIS) files on an as-needed basis. 3. Public Input - The Collier MPO posted an interactive map on its website that generated nearly 400 comments. Comments were used to develop an overlay map for project review. 4. Crash and Environmental Justice Community Data – An analysis of crash data indicated concentrated bicycle and pedestrian crashes near land uses related to tourism and services or in relation to EJ community areas. The combination of these two factors—bicycle and pedestrian crash clusters and EJ communities—proved to be a useful marker for the needs of low-income, minority, and immigrant populations. 5. Network Configuration - Collier MPO staff worked closely with the MPO advisory committees and agency staff and considered public comment in the process of articulating design and planning policies related to roadways. 6. Gap and Needs Analysis - Using GIS data, the needs analysis included overlaying the collected data, public input, and draft policies to identify missing links and segment deficiencies in the bicycle/pedestrian network. Throughout the process, monthly updates on the needs were provided to the advisory committees and stakeholders beginning in the fall 2018, which led to further refinement of the prioritization criteria, network gaps, facility needs, and priority projects. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 888 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-43 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan The needs analysis identified 74 miles of roadway lacking any type of bicycle or pedestrian facility and 150 miles of roadway lacking sufficient bicycle facilities. Table 4-7 lists the bicycle and pedestrian network gaps and facility needs. Appendix C includes a map from the BPMP showing bicycle and pedestrian facility gaps overlapped with public comments. Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Once the needs were identified, the BPMP’s goals and objectives served as the prioritization criteria to develop a list of prioritized bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The Needs Analysis in the Plan is comprehensive and inclusive of many attributes. For example, Table 4-8 identifies road segments that are prioritized for Complete Streets – Safety Corridor Studies resulting from an analysis of high crash locations on arterial and collector roads overlapping with EJ communities and transit corridors. Table 4-9 lists the bicycle and pedestrian priorities based on technical need (gap analysis) and public comments. The segments identified totaled 66 miles. Table 4-7. Network Gaps/Facility Needs Source: Collier MPO BPMP Type of Gap in Bicycle Network Mileage of Missing Facilities All Gaps on Collector & Arterial Roadways Gaps Meeting Equity Criteriona Gaps Meeting Safety Criterion Gaps Meeting Equity and Safety Criteria No facility 73.9 22.9 2.4 0.0 Insufficient facility 150.3 44.5 13.1 5.8 Paved shoulderb 85.3 26.0 1.7 1.3 Connector sidewalkb 65.0 18.5 11.4 4.5 Total miles 224.2 67.4 15.5 5.8 a Equity criterion established as block groups receiving a medium, high, or very high ranking from the Composite Equity Analysis. b Paved shoulder/ connector sidewalk are sub-categories of Insufficient Facility total. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 889 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-44 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-8. Complete Streets – Safety Corridor Studies Source: Collier MPO BPMP Rank Road Name From To Project Description 1 US-41 Tamiami Trail Commercial Dr./ Palm St. Guilford Rd. Review, adopt and implement FDOT Road Safety Audit recommendations Airport Rd. US-41 Tamiami Trail Estey Ave. 2 Airport Rd. Estey Ave. Golden Gate Pkwy. Corridor Study 3 US41 Tamiami Trail Commercial Dr./ Palm St. 9th Ave. Corridor Study 4 Goodlette-Frank Rd. US-41 Tamiami Trail Golden Gate Pkwy. Corridor Study 5 Davis Blvd. US-41 Tamiami Trail Airport Rd. Corridor Study 6 Golden Gate Pkwy. Santa Barbara Blvd. Collier Blvd. Corridor Study 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 890 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-45 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-9. Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Source: Collier MPO BPMP Road From To Distance Agency Facility Type 111th Ave. N Vanderbilt Dr. Tamiami Trl. N 1.0 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Airport Rd. N Pine Ridge Rd. Immokalee Rd. 4.2 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Airport Rd. N S Horseshoe Dr. Pinewoods Cir. 2.5 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Airport Rd. S Seagrape Ave. Davis Blvd. 0.5 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Airport Rd. S Davis Blvd. Tamiami Trl. E 0.8 Collier County Safety Bluebill Ave. Bluebill Ave. Vanderbilt Dr. 0.4 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Bonita Beach Rd. Vanderbilt Dr. 1.7 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Castaways St. Saturn Ct. Amazon Ct. 0.2 Marco Island Marco Master Plan Collier Blvd. 17th Ave. SW City Gate Blvd. N 2.0 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Collier Blvd. N End Jolley Bridge Fiddlers Creek Pkwy. 3.6 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Copeland Ave. S Broadway Oyster Bar Ln. 0.7 Everglades City Pathway Davis Blvd. Tamiami Trl. Airport Rd. S 1.0 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Everglades Blvd. Oil Well Rd. 58TH AVE NE 3.1 Collier County Sidewalk Golden Gate Pkwy. 9th St. N Estuary Blvd. 1.6 Naples Bike Lane/Path Greenbrier St. Manor Ter. Saturn Ct. 0.2 Marco Island Marco Master Plan Immokalee Rd. Tamiami Trl. Northbrooke Dr. 4.0 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Logan Blvd. N Logan Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. 1.1 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Logan Blvd. S Logan Blvd. Green Blvd. 2.0 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Oil Well Rd. Everglades Blvd. N Oil Well Grade Rd. 3.9 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Oil Well Rd. Ave Maria Blvd. SR 29 5.7 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Old US 41 N Tamiami Trl. Performance Way 1.5 Collier County Pathway Peru St. Seagrape Dr. 0.1 Marco Island Marco Master Plan Pine Ridge Rd. Tamiami Trl. Logan Blvd. S 5.1 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Randall Blvd. Randall Blvd. Approach Blvd. 1.5 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Rattlesnake H Rd. Valley Stream Dr. Collier Blvd. 3.5 Collier County Bike Lane/Path San Marco Rd. Goodland Dr. Tamiami Trl. E 6.5 Collier County Pathway Santa Barbara Blvd. Green Blvd. 17th Ave. SW 0.2 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Saturn Ct. Castaways St. Greenbrier St. 0.1 Marco Island Marco Master Plan Seagrape Dr. Peru St. Swallow Ave. 0.7 Marco Island Marco Master Plan Tamiami Trl. E Greenway Rd. Six LS Farm Rd. 2.5 Collier County Pathway Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Gulfshore Dr. Vanderbilt Dr. 0.4 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Wiggins Pass Rd. Vanderbilt Dr. Tamiami Trl. N 1.0 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Wilson Blvd. N Golden Gate Blvd 24th Ave. NE 3.0 Collier County Pathway Total Miles 66.3 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 891 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-46 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Shared-Use Nonmotorized (SUN) Trail Alignments and Spine Pathway Corridors Managed by the FDEP Office of Greenways and Trails, the SUN Trail program funds non-motorized, paved, shared-use trails that are part of the Florida Greenways and Trails System Priority Trail. Appendix C includes the SUN Trail Alignments and Spine Pathway Corridors map, which shows the two SUN Trail alignments and other interconnected spine pathway corridors within Collier County that form an integrated, high- priority pathway network. The BPMP identified the following as priority projects to complete the SUN Trail (FDOT 2016) and Spine Trail network. Further details on each project is provided in the BPMP. • SUN Trail Alignments • FPL Easement/Livingston/Rich King Greenway Alignment • Gordon River Greenway Connections • Golden Gate Canal Greenway (Proposed) • Golden Gate Parkway between Santa Barbara and Collier Boulevards • SR 29 and SR 82 Existing Plus Proposed Facilities Additional needs analysis included examining the 2040 LRTP roadway projects, as roadway enhancement projects provide an excellent opportunity to cost-effectively expand the bicycle and pedestrian network. Appendix C includes the Existing Plus Proposed Facilities map, which provides a visual summary of the project priorities for major roadways and the combined SUN Trail/Spine Trail network. Local and Residential Roads Since the 2040 LRTP update, the Collier MPO completed the Golden Gate City Walkable Community Study to develop a prioritized list of sidewalk and pedestrian amenity projects that would promote and enhance walkability, bicycle use, transit use, and social equity throughout the community. Projects were scored based on proximity to crashes, schools, commercial destinations, parks, and transit, and public input. Projects were then ranked in tiers based on their current condition and greatest value to the public: • Tier 1 Projects were given the highest priority based on their benefit to the community • Tier 2 Projects are instrumental in completing a continuous sidewalk network throughout the community. • Tier 3 Projects will enhance overall walkability within the community The results of the study demonstrated a significant need for sidewalk infrastructure in Golden Gate City. The Collier MPO has completed a total of four Walkable Community Studies, including Immokalee, Bayshore and Naples Manor in addition to Golden Gate City. A fifth study completed for Naples Park was never officially approved by the MPO because of unresolved differences of opinion within the community. Local Agency Priorities on Local Roads Adopted local agency plans are incorporated into the BPMP by reference. Key priorities are summarized as follows. Naples The Naples Downtown Circulation and Connectivity Plan identifies bicycle and pedestrian improvements to the Gordon River Bridge (5th Avenue S) as a priority for the region as it is 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 892 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-47 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan the hub of the SUN Trail and Spine Corridor Network. The project design calls for narrowing the existing travel lanes, eliminating the shoulder, and moving the existing barrier to provide a 14-foot-wide shared-use path on each side of the bridge. Everglades City Everglades City identified four sidewalks projects (along Copeland Avenue, Datura Street, Broadway, and Collier Avenue) as part of their priority needs in response to the MPO’s call for projects in 2017. A second call for projects issued in 2018 resulted in the identification of segments of Copeland, Hibiscus, and Broadway as priority needs for sidewalks or bike lanes. Immokalee Urban Area The Immokalee Walkable Community Study served as the basis for a $13 million TIGER Grant application, which the County was awarded in 2018. The BPMP identifies SR 29 and SR 82 as critical components of the Spine Trail Network for Collier County. Additionally, the Immokalee CRA requested to extend bicycle and pedestrian facilities along Lake Trafford Road to the lake as part of the Spine Trail priority. Marco Island Top priorities from Marco Island’s 2019 Bike Path Master Plan include: • Collier Boulevard – alternate bike lanes (Landmark extension) • Bald Eagle Drive – bike lanes (Collier to San Marco) Future updates to the Marco Island Bike Path Master Plan are automatically incorporated by reference into the BPMP. 4-4 Transit Needs This section summarizes the needs and improvements identified in the Collier County Ten-Year Transit Development Plan (TDP) (Tindale Oliver 2020c), which is incorporated by reference into this LRTP and was developed by CAT in coordination with the Collier MPO. Transit needs information identified this document was used to assess transit needs for the County and its municipalities in the next 20 years. Goals and Objectives CAT has established seven goals to help fulfill their vision and mission for the County and its municipalities. These goals guide the transit needs and improvement development process. • Goal 1: Operate reliable, convenient, and cost-effective mobility services that safely and efficiently meet the mobility needs of Collier County’s workers, residents and visitors. • Goal 2: Increase the resiliency of Collier County, protecting our man-made and natural resources, by providing attractive and convenient mobility alternatives that will reduce adverse carbon and environmental impacts within our communities. • Goal 3: Build meaningful partnerships that increase awareness and education of and about mobility options and increase the viability of mobility services to promote livability and enhance economic and social well-being. • Goal 4: Coordinate the development and provision of mobility services with local, regional, state planning efforts and through public and private partnerships. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 893 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-48 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan • Goal 5: Use technologies and innovations in service delivery to improve productivity, efficiency, reliability, and cost-effectiveness of mobility services and operations. • Goal 6: Monitor and improve mobility service quality and service standards. • Goal 7: Maximize the use of all funding sources available, including through partnerships with businesses, employers, and other institutions to increase and improve access to mobility services and mobility for workers, residents, visitors. Development of Transit Needs The development of transit needs was guided by a review of existing plans and studies, baseline conditions, existing transit performance, public input, regional coordination, and the development of a transit demand analysis, which includes market assessments and transit modeling to identify gaps in the system. Existing Plans and Studies The initial process for developing the list of transit needs included a review of local, regional, state, and federal planning documents, as noted in the TDP. Public Outreach Public outreach occurred throughout the development of the TDP to ensure that public input guided the development of needs and potential improvements. Collier community members, elected officials, and other stakeholders were all invited to engage with the TDP planning team through surveys made available on CAT bus routes, online public surveys, stakeholder interviews, discussion workshops, public transit advisory committee, project group meetings, and public workshops. Existing Transit Evaluation The existing transit evaluation process consisted of three elements – identifying existing transit service in the County and its municipalities, comparing CAT transit performance against similarly sized peer transit agencies, and developing a trend analysis that summarizes the results from the peer review analysis. Existing Transit Service CAT operates a fleet of 29 buses that provide service on 19 fixed-route bus lines to the public 7 days per week from 3:55 a.m. to 8:48 p.m. CAT also provides complementary paratransit service through CAT Connect for people with a qualifying disability that are not otherwise able to access the fixed-route buses. CAT operates out of the County-owned Radio Road Transit facility. This facility offers connections for pedestrians, bicyclists, drop-off passengers, and nearby park- and-ride passengers at its Intermodal Transfer Station . Peer and Trend Analysis The peer comparison and trend analysis examine CAT transit system performance and compared services to peer agencies. The peer comparison and trend analysis provided a starting point for understanding CAT’s transit system operating environment over time when compared to other similarly sized transit systems. Key trends between 2013 and 2018 included: • CAT increased vehicle miles, revenue miles, vehicle hours and route miles, and vehicle miles per capita. CAT was above the peer average for passenger miles, vehicle miles, revenue miles, and route miles. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 894 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-49 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan • Passenger trips and passenger miles declined , as did passenger trips per capita, passenger trips per revenue mile, and passenger trips per revenue hour. CAT was 19 percent below the peer average for passenger trips and 20 percent above the peer average for passenger miles. • Total operating expenses increased 6 percent. CAT operating expense per passenger mile and operating expense per revenue mile was below the peer average. • The share of operating expenses funded by passenger fares decreased 34 percent, which was near the peer average. Transit Demand Analysis The transit demand analysis for MPO boundary area included an evaluation from two different customer types, described below. The discretionary market refers to people who may choose to ride transit but who have other mobility options. Previous studies have shown most CAT riders are not discretionary riders. The analysis was based primarily on population and employment density to identify these markets. While much of the area falls under the ”Low” category, the density threshold assessment indicated that there are employment-based areas that have “High” or “Very High” transit-investment potential east of Naples Airport, north of Pine Ridge Road, and along the Tamiami Trail. Household unit- based areas with “High” transit-investment potential are located along Naples Beach, south of Pine Ridge Road, and in Immokalee east of Sunshine Boulevard. Traditional Market Assessment As part of the transit market assessment, socioeconomic and demographic characteristics were studied among people that are more likely to use transit because they have limited mobility options and depend on public transit for most transportation. Demographic factors including population density, older adults, youth, and households below the federal poverty level helped identify where people are likely to rely on transit the most. CAT serves areas with traditional transit markets, such as north of downtown Naples and near Lee County. Areas in Immokalee also have strong traditional transit markets. Ridership Projections Transit demand and mobility needs were evaluated for the CAT fixed-route system using the Federal Transit Administration’s ridership forecasting tool T-BEST. The model was based on the assumption that population and employ- ment, travel demand, technology, and transit routes are the same as today. Table 4-10 provides the ridership forecast by route in the years 2021 and 2030. The model projected a 17-percent increase in transit ridership for all routes by 2030, particularly for Routes 21, 27, and 121. The transit plan suggests the highest ridership increases are possible by expanding service in areas with high population density and growth. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 895 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-50 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-10. Ridership and Growth Rates with No Improvements, 2021–2030a Route 2021 Average Annual Ridership 2030 Average Annual Ridership 2021–2030 Absolute Change 2021–2030 Average Growth Rate 11 108,083 123,855 15,772 14.6% 12 82,923 96,211 13,288 16.0% 13 73,580 91,681 18,101 24.6% 14 55,388 65,657 10,269 18.5% 15 103,042 107,980 4,938 4.8% 16 50,253 52,259 2,006 4.0% 17 39,922 44,056 4,134 10.4% 18 27,661 31,555 3,894 14.1% 19 66,732 77,813 11,081 16.6% 20 9,091 9,180 89 1.0% 21 12,812 21,449 8,637 67.4% 22 54,895 64,340 9,445 17.2% 23 27,698 33,854 6,156 22.2% 24 51,055 58,822 7,767 15.2% 25 17,308 20,897 3,589 20.7% 26 6,044 6,547 503 8.3% 27 33,319 47,517 14,198 42.6% 28 26,719 34,023 7,304 27.3% 121 25,280 35,710 10,430 41.3% Totals 871,805 1,023,406 151,601 17.4% a Based on T-BEST model Source: Collier County Ten-Year Transit Development Plan 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-51 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Gap Overview The gap analysis compares existing service coverage to transit market analysis results. The goal was to identify gaps in public transit where travel demand is high but where transit service is less than predicted demand, and where transit stops may have barriers. The gap analysis from the TDP revealed that the areas that have potential for being underserved are located west and east of US 41 but south of Bonita Beach Road. Other major areas that are underserved include North Naples, Immokalee, Collier Boulevard between Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Radio Road, and areas east of Goodlette-Frank Road. Transit Needs Results The evaluation baseline conditions, existing transit perfor- mance, public input, regional coordination, and transit demand and gap analysis helped identify a set of transit needs for the County and its municipalities. Once the transit needs were identified, a quantitative- qualitative methodology was developed to evaluate and prioritize the transit needs. Prioritization was based on weighing the benefits of each service improvement against the others. Three evaluation categories were identified for determining the criteria for evaluation: public outreach, transit markets, and productivity and efficiency. Table 4-11 presents the criteria, measure of effectiveness, and weighting used to rank the needs. Table 4-11. Transit Needs Evaluation Measures Category Criteria Measure of Effectiveness Relative Weighting Overall Category Weight Public Outreach Public Input Level of interest in specific alternatives (Very High, High, Moderate, Low) 40% 40% Transit Markets Traditional Market Percent serving poverty 15% 30% Proximity to Employment Market Percent of countywide employment market served 15% Productivity and Efficiency Productivity Trips per hour (T-BEST-generated trips and revenue hours of service) 15% 30% Cost Efficiency Cost per trip (including new trips) 15% Total 100% 100% Source: Collier MPO TDP, 2020 Table 4-12 lists the transit needs based on the TDP and socioeconomic data expected through 2045. Table 4-12 also presents the ranking (where available) for the transit needs identified. Figure 4-12 illustrates the transit network service needs, which includes extending service, realigning routes, and providing new service. The needs listed are organized by type of improvement: route network, route frequency, span of service, and new service. There is a need to extend current bus routes to reach more riders, realign routes to create more efficient service, increase how often buses provide service, and provide new service to unserved areas. More details on route descriptions and benefits are provided in the TDP. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 897 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-52 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-12. 2045 Transit Needs Summary Route Location Rank Improvement Description Proposed Realignment Changes Route 22 1 Realign to streamline circulation in Immokalee, reduce duplication with Route 23, reduce the need for transfers between Routes 22 and 23, and extend service east along Main Street and to the various packing houses that employ approximately 20,000 employees. Route 23 1 Realign to provide direct connections to the westernmost residential cluster on Lake Trafford Road, the County Health Department, several packing houses along New Harvest Road, and the easternmost residential cluster on Farm Workers Way. Route 11 2 Minor extension of the north to connect to the Walmart on Tamiami Trail and Immokalee Rd. Or consider connecting to the LinC at the Walmart. Routes 17/ and 18 4 • Realign to combine the two routes along the portion from Government Center along Tamiami Trail to Rattlesnake Hammock Road to Collier Blvd. to the Super Walmart at Tamiami Trail. • Remove service along Tamiami Trail Routes 19 and /28 6 Realign by eliminating unproductive segments of Route 19 and combining the service hours into Route 28 with increased frequency. Route 12 7 Minor extension west into Walmart and other shopping plazas at the intersection of Tamiami Trail and Immokalee Rd. Route 13 and 14 4 and 3 Realign from a one-way pair to two bidirectional routes, with one operating along 9th Street/Tamiami Trail and the other along Goodlette-Frank Rd. Route 20 and 26 9 Combine Routes 20 and 26 to improve frequency and streamline service. Route 21 (Marco Island Express) 11 Provide express service to the Walmart Supercenter on Collier Blvd. and Tamiami Trail and potentially to the Government Center. Route 25 (NS and EW) 8 and 13 • Extend the North-South alignment north to Immokalee Rd. • East-West alignment would remain the same. Route 27 (NS and EW) 15 and 12 • Extend the North-South alignment south along Collier Boulevard to Tamiami Trail. • Extend the East-West alignment east to provide service along Immokalee Rd. to the Publix shopping center at Immokalee Rd. and Oil Well Rd. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 898 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-53 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-12. 2045 Transit Needs Summary Route Location Rank Improvement Description Proposed Frequency Changes Route 19/28 Reduce headway time from 165 minutes to 60 minutes. Route 23 Reduce headway from 60 minutes to 40 minutes Route 121 1 Add two morning and two evening trips during peak periods, while coordinating with employee shift times at major employment locations. Route 11 3 Reduce headway time from 30-minutes to 20-minutes. Route 12 3 Reduce headway time from 25- to 90-minutes to 30-minute peak headway and a 60-minute off-peak headway. Route 13 6 Reduce headway time from 40 minutes to 30 minutes. Route 14 6 Reduce headway time from 60 minutes 30 minutes. Route 24 6 Reduce headway time from 85 minutes to 60 minutes. Route 15 and 16 2 and 5 Reduce headway time from 90 minutes to 45 minutes. Proposed Span Improvements Route 11, 13, 14, 17/18, 19/28, 24 1, 1, 1, 6, 4, 4 Extend service to 10:00 p.m. Proposed New Service Routes Island Trolley Would travel along Collier Blvd. on Marco Island as a fixed-route and connect to the realigned Route 21 Marco Island Express route. Would be a hop-on/hop-off type, fare-free service using two vehicles with 30-minute headways. New UF/IFAS and Lehigh Acres Route Would connect Immokalee to the University of Florida/IFAS satellite campus and Lehigh Acres. Further study is recommended due to the roadway constraints for transit vehicles entering/exiting UF/IFAS campus. I-75 Premium Express 9 Would operate like an express commuter service beginning at the Government Center and end at the Florida Gulf Coast Town Center. The route would require one vehicle to provide 90-minute headway service from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 899 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-54 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-12. 2045 Transit Needs Summary Route Location Rank Improvement Description Bayshore Shuttle Would operate as a fixed-route electric shuttle with free hop-on/hop-off service. The route would require one vehicle to provide 15-minute headway service from Weeks Ave. to the Naples Botanical Garden from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Downtown Autonomous Circulator Would address the parking shortage in downtown and would begin on S. 4th Ave. from S. 9th St. to S. 3rd St. and go south along S. 3rd St. to S. 13th Ave. Naples Pier Electric Shuttle The downtown autonomous circulator would alleviate parking demand in downtown. It would begin at Naples Pier and run along Broad Avenue with a stop at Crayton Cove, before going north along S. 8th St. to S. 6th Ave. Mobility-On-Demand Uses on-demand information, real-time data, and predictive analytics that provides travelers the best transportation choice for their needs. Service can be requested via a mobile app, website, or by calling CAT. Helps solve the ‘first/last mile’ problem associated with limited access to transit. Four MOD Zones identified: Golden Gate, North Naples, Naples Zone, and Marco Island. Vanpooling (Everglades City) Indicated by FDOT District 1 as a workable solution for rural communities, such as Everglades City. The proposed program could connect commuters from Everglades City to the Government Center. Capital Infrastructure Regionwide Technology The technology needs outlined in the TDP’s Situation Appraisal includes implementing or upgrading transit scheduling and dispatching software, installing automatic passenger count and vehicle announcement systems for fixed-route vehicles, updating fare collection systems, and enhancing on-board safety measures. Bus Stop Infrastructure Improve benches, shelters, bicycle storage facilities, and other infrastructure at bus stops to enhance the rider experience and potentially attract new riders. Improve ADA Accessibility Improve bus stop safety and ADA accessibility throughout the entire system for all riders. Replace and Add New Vehicles Continue to replace existing fleet and add new vehicles in order to provide new service. Park-and-Ride Lots Improve transit access through the development of park-and-ride lots. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 900 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-55 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Other improvements and policy recommendations for transit service needs include: • Pursue public-private partnerships local hotels in Marco Island to support Route 21, the proposed new service - Island Trolley and MOD. • Brand buses on the beach and those associated with proposed MOD services. • Conduct a comprehensive analysis of the existing CAT network, routes, and further study proposed new service. • Create a transfer hub along the urbanized area of Immokalee Road to provide passenger transfers, vehicle staging, and driver relief. • Establish a coordinating committee with the region’s local planning departments to review transportation needs and ensure funding and strategies are in place for implementation. • Establish transit service policies to adopt in Collier County’s land development regulations. • Modify the Land Development Code and Development Review processes to include recommendations from the transit impact study by coordinating with Collier County and local municipalities. • Begin coordination with LeeTran to explore a seamless fare system between LeeTran and CAT. • Further study a new CAT and LeeTran route that connects Immokalee to the University of Florida/IFAS satellite campus and Lehigh Acres. The study will include roadway constraints, determining final alignment, endpoint, and stop locations. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 901 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-56 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Figure 4-12. Transit Network Service Needs 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 902 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-57 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan 4-5 Air Transportation Needs Within the Collier MPO jurisdiction are four publicly owned airports: • Naples Municipal Airport • Immokalee Regional Airport • Marco Island Executive Airport • Everglades Airpark The Collier County Airport Authority, which is a branch of the local government overseen by the Collier County BCC, oversees the development and management of the airports in Immokalee, Marco Island, and Everglades City. The City of Naples Airport Authority is charged with the operation, development, and improvements of the Naples Airport. The closest international airport to the Collier County area is the Southwest Florida International Airport, which is located to the north in Fort Myers in Lee County. Naples Airport Naples Airport is located in the City of Naples and is bounded by Corporate Flight Drive to the north, North Road to the south, Airport Pulling Road to the east, and the Gordon River to the west. Public access to the airport is at the intersection of Radio Road and Airport Pulling Road. In Fiscal Year 2019, there were 112,800 takeoffs and landings. The airport typically houses 308 aircraft, which significantly increases during the seasonal months (Naples Airport Authority 2020). There is no regularly scheduled passenger service at this airport. However, it maintains a Title 14 CFR, Part 139 Airport Operating Certificate to accommodate both scheduled and unscheduled operations. According to the Naples Airport Master Plan (ESA 2020), in 2017 the airport operated at 56 percent capacity and is forecasted to operate at 84 percent capacity by 2038. The airport master plan includes capital improvements through 2039. There are no plans to expand the airport. The roadway project needs include intersection improvements at Airport Pulling Road and Radio Road to accommodate future airport operations. Immokalee Regional Airport The Immokalee Regional Airport is situated on 1,333 acres and is bordered by Immokalee Road to the south and Airway Road to the west. Airpark Boulevard provides public access to the airport. As discussed earlier, this airport has been designated for a 60-acre Foreign Trade Zone, which includes portions of the Florida Tradeport Industrial Park. The industrial park covers 400 acres and is accessed by Airpark Boulevard. The airport also includes the Immokalee Regional Raceway (International Hot Rod Association Drag Strip) and is used for aerial firefighting and crop dusting operations. The Immokalee Regional Airport, Airport Layout Plan Update (Collier County Airport Authority 2017) notes that the airport operations are expected to grow through 2037 requiring some airfield improvements. The roadway project needs include widening Immokalee Road from SR 29 to Airpark Boulevard to accommodate future airport operations. Marco Island Executive Airport The Marco Island Executive airport is located 12 miles south of downtown Naples and has one runway that measures 5,000 feet. The airport can accommodate smaller general aviation aircraft as well as business jets. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 903 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-58 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Everglades Airpark The Everglades Airpark is situated on 29 acres and is located immediately southwest of the Big Cypress National Preserve and is surrounded on three sides by the waters of the Everglades National Park. The Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve and Collier Seminole Park are to the north. The airpark primarily supports recreational flying, environmental patrol, and flight training. It includes one 2,400-foot-long runway and is considered Collier County’s Eco-tourism Airport. Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport Located just west of the Collier and Miami-Dade County line, the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport (TNT) provides a precision-instrument landing and training facility in South Florida for commercial pilots, private training, and small military operations. Originally named the Everglades Jetport, the airport includes one 10,499-foot-long runway and is operated by the Miami-Dade Aviation Department. The airport is situated within a 24,960-acre property and has approximately 900 acres of developed and operational land. The remaining area is managed and operated by the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 904 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Financial Resources 5-1 Overview 5-2 Roadway and Transit Revenue Projections 5-3 Roadway and Transit Federal/ State Funding 5-4 Local Revenue Projections and Sources 5-5 Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Sources 5 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 905 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 5-1 Chapter 5 Financial Resources Chapter 5 Financial Resources The Collier 2045 LRTP financial plan establishes the basis for determining how many Needs Assessment projects can be included in the Cost Feasible Plan. The financial plan recognizes all revenues by source that can reasonably be expected to be available during the planning period. The available revenues and planning-level cost estimates are applied to each project from the Needs Assessment to develop the Cost Feasible Plan. 5-1 Overview Ensuring that the financial resources will be available to fund the multimodal transportation projects by 2045 is an important element of the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP. The premise of the long-range revenue forecast is rooted in federal regulation originally required by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. All transportation acts since that time have continued the requirement for a financial plan. Consistent with the most recent requirements of 23 USC §134, the revenues identified for this LRTP update are 1 https://www.mpoac.org/ reasonably expected to be available to implement the adopted 2045 LRTP. This chapter summarizes transportation revenues available to fund multimodal transportation projects within the County and its municipalities through 2045. This chapter further documents the assumptions used to develop the future revenues. In accordance with federal statutes, FDOT in coordination with the Florida Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC)1 provides long-range revenue forecasts to assist Florida MPOs. These forecasts help MPOs comply with federal requirements for developing cost feasible transporta- tion plans and demonstrate a coordinated planning effort for transportation facilities and services in Florida. As shown on Figure 5-1, financial planning for statewide and metropolitan transportation plans is typically required for three periods: long range (20 or more years), intermediate range (10 to 15 years), and short range (5 years). As noted in the FDOT Revenue Forecasting Guidebook (FDOT 2018b), long- range revenue and program forecasts are general in nature to encourage a variety of approaches and technologies to meet the goals and objectives. Figure 5-1. Planning Periods Summary (Revenue Bands) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 906 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 5-2 Chapter 5 Financial Resources The revenues and ultimately the cost feasible project costs in this LRTP update are shown in year of expenditure (YOE) dollars to reflect inflation. Federal guidance [23 CFR 450.324(F)(11)] notes that revenue and cost estimates must use an inflation rate to reflect the YOE dollars. The YOE represents the value of money at the time it will be collected. The YOE dollars is based on reasonable financial principles and information, and is developed in cooperation between the MPO, state, and public transportation operator(s). The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Revenue Projections Technical Memorandum (provided under separate cover) describes each revenue source, revenue forecasting assumptions, and the methodology for developing statewide estimates of federal and state revenues. 5-2 Roadway and Transit Revenue Projections Revenue projections include federal, state, and county sources. The County and its municipalities have historically funded transportation projects using local sources, such as fuel taxes, impact fees, and general fund transfers (ad valorem) in addition to federal and state revenues. Except for general fund transfers (which are projected to only support operations and maintenance [O&M]), it is assumed that the County and it municipalities will continue to use these revenue sources to fund transportation projects from 2026 through 2045. Table 5-1 summarizes the total projected revenues in YOE dollars that are anticipated to be available for the 2045 LRTP. 2 MAP-21 is the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, which was signed into law on July 6, 2012, by President Obama. 5-3 Roadway and Transit Federal/State Funding Projections of federal and state roadway and transit revenues for use in LRTPs are developed by FDOT. FDOT’s 2045 Revenue Forecast for the Collier MPO provides federal and state funds for the Collier MPO to use in developing its forecasted revenues. These revenues are for capacity and non-capacity programs consistent with statewide priorities. Table 5-2 highlights these revenue amounts in YOE format as required by MAP-21.2 The following provides a brief description of each revenue source. • Transportation Management Area: Additional federal funds are distributed to an urban area that has a population greater than 200,000 (known as a TMA), as designated by the U.S. Census Bureau following the 2010 Census. • Transportation Alternatives Program: Created as a new funding program under current federal transportation legislation (MAP-21), the Transportation Alternatives Program combines three previous programs— Transportation Enhancements, Safe Routes to School, and Recreational Trails Program. • Strategic Intermodal System: The SIS capacity program provides funds for construction, improvements, and associated ROW acquisition on the State Highway System (SHS) roadways that are designated as part of SIS. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 907 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 5-3 Chapter 5 Financial Resources Table 5-1. 2045 LRTP Revenue Projections Jurisdiction Funding Source Total 2026–2045 (YOE) Revenues Dedicated to Transit Operations Federal Transit Operations $57,776,800 State Transit Operations $39,783,600 Local Transit Operations $168,249,200 Fares Transit Operations $44,689,600 Local Transportation Disadvantaged $24,409,800 Subtotal for Transit Operations $334,909,000 Revenues Dedicated to Transit Capital Projects Federal Transit Capital $105,439,000 Federal & State Transit Capital $3,089,000 State Transit Capital $0 Local Transit Capital $21,925,000 Subtotal for Transit Capital Projects $130,453,000 Total Transit Revenues $465,362,000 Revenues Dedicated to Operations and Maintenance (Roadway) County General Fund (Ad Valorem) $240,000,000 County Fuel Tax $180,254,000 Total Operations and Maintenance (Roadway) $420,254,000 Revenues Remaining for Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Projects (Roadway) Federal Transportation Alternatives Program $6,760,000 Federal Transportation Management Area $100,360,000 State Strategic Intermodal System $337,404,000 State Other Arterial and Construction (includes ROW) $443,200,000 Other Arterial PD&E and Design $97,504,000 Transportation Impact Fees $346,275,700 County Fuel Tax $195,275,300 Total for Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Projects (Roadway) $1,526,779,000 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 908 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 5-4 Chapter 5 Financial Resources • Other Arterial Construction/ROW: This capacity program provides funds for construction, improvements, and associated ROW acquisition on SHS roadways that are not designated as part of SIS. • Transportation Regional Incentive Program: TRIP was established as part of the state’s major growth management legislation enacted with Senate Bill 360. The program is intended to encourage regional planning by providing matching funds for improvements to regionally significant transportation facilities identified and prioritized by regional partners. • Federal and State Transit Revenues: Estimates of federal and state transit revenues are based on information provided in the FDOT Revenue Forecasting Guidebook. Table 5-2. Federal and State Revenue Projections (YOE) Jurisdiction Funding Source 2026–2030 2031–2035 2036–2045 Total 2026–2045 Federal Transportation Alternatives (Urban Area) $1,690,000 $1,690,000 $3,380,000 $6,760,000 Federal Transportation Management Area $25,090,000 $25,090,000 $50,180,000 $100,360,000 State and Federal Other Arterial/Construction & ROW $100,620,000 $110,540,000 $232,040,000 $443,200,000 State Transportation Regional Incentive Program $3,924,000 $4,368,000 $8,952,000 $17,244,000 State and Federal Transit $46,240,000 $50,640,000 $105,500,000 $202,380,000 Total Revenues $177,564,000 $192,328,000 $400,052,000 $769,944,000 Jurisdiction Funding Source 2026–2030 2031–2045 Total 2026–2045 Federal Strategic Intermodal System $38,622,000 $298,782,000 $337,404,000 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 909 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 5-5 Chapter 5 Financial Resources 5-4 Local Revenue Projections and Sources In addition to federal and state funding, local revenue sources help build and maintain the transportation network within the County and its municipalities. By creating a partnership between local jurisdictions and FDOT that combines local revenues such as impact fees and other non-traditional transportation funding sources (for example, TRIP, sales tax initiatives, and others) with FDOT Funds, the MPO, FDOT, and the local governments have the potential to fund a significant number of local and state capacity projects that support safety, growth, economic enhancements, and development. This also allows the MPO to invest more on citizen priorities like complete streets initiatives, transit, and sidewalk/bike path facilities. The following text briefly describes each County funding element. • Transportation Impact Fees: Transportation impact fees provide revenue for financing the addition and expansion of roadway facilities needed to accommodate specific new growth and development. • Fuel Taxes: Fuel taxes represent a major portion of Collier County’s local transportation revenues. Fuel tax revenue is dedicated to both transportation capacity expansion and maintenance and operations. Fuel taxes collected by the cities within the County were not considered during the LRTP. • General Fund/Ad Valorem: In the past, the County has used General Fund revenues to help fund capacity expansion and debt service, but with recent constraints placed on this fund, fuel taxes have been shifted into that role. While taxable values help stabilize the revenues, the County will continue to assign General Fund revenues to non-capacity roadway improvements. • Sales Tax: A 2018 1-cent infrastructure sales surtax that is assigned to a variety of projects including transportation infrastructure. 5-5 Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Sources Similar to roadway and transit funding sources, there are multiple funding sources for bicycle and pedestrian projects. The primary funding sources available for bicycle and pedestrian projects presented in the BPMP are through federal programs, as discussed in the following text. • National Highway Performance Program: These funds were established under MAP-21 and provide support for projects or program projects that are on an eligible facility or an eligible activity that supports national performance goals. Bicycle and pedestrian improvements associated with a National Highway System facility are eligible. • Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Program: The STBG Program provides the most flexible funding among all federal-aid transportation programs. Specifically, the STBG-Transportation Alternatives provides funding for programs and projects defined as transportation alternatives. • Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP): This program provides funds to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, including non-state- owned public roads and roads on tribal lands and can be used for pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements. States may obligate funds under HSIP to carry out any 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 910 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 5-6 Chapter 5 Financial Resources highway safety improvement project on any public road or publicly owned bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trails. • Recreational Trails Program: This federally funded competitive grant program provides financial assistance to city, county, state, or federal governments; organizations approved by the state; or state- and federally recognized Indian tribal governments, for the development of recreational trails, trailheads, and trailside facilities. • Federal Transit Administration Funds: Some FTA funds may be used to fund the design, construction, and maintenance of pedestrian and bicycle projects that enhance or are related to public transportation facilities. • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Funds: NHTSA provides funding to states for imple- menting priority area programs and activities to improve traffic safety and reduce crashes, serious injuries, and fatalities. Emphasis areas under the pedestrian and bicycle safety program include: – Increasing awareness and understanding of safety issues and compliance with traffic laws – Development and use of a systematic approach to identify locations and behaviors prone to bicycle and pedestrian crashes and implementing multidisciplinary countermeasures – Creating urban and rural built environments that support and encourage safe walking and biking • SUN Trail Network Funds: SUN Trail funds are managed by the FDEP Office of Greenways and Trails. The Southwest Coast Connector Trail Alignment noted in the Needs Plan (Chapter 4) is eligible to receive SUN Trail funding. Not all funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects is done through traditional funding programs. Alternative funding sources include the following: • The Collier MPO has jurisdictional authority over land use and zoning and can, therefore, work with developers to address gaps in bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and make connections as new homes, communities, and shopping areas are constructed. • The MPO can form partnerships with other agencies to implement projects. • Bicycle and pedestrian improvements can be incorporated into roadway construction projects or funded independently. For example, Collier County typically funds transportation improvements that incorporate bicycle and pedestrian facilities using local funds on County-owned roads. • The County and its municipalities can apply for funding related to state and federal grant programs, Safe Routes to Schools Programs, NHTSA, and the Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development Transportation Discretionary Grant program (formerly the Transportation Investment Generating Economy Recovery Grant program). 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 911 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 5-7 Chapter 5 Financial Resources 5-6 Airport Funding While all the airports are owned and operated by a munici- pality within the Collier Metropolitan Area, the federal government requires airports to operate with little outside assistance, and therefore receive minimum direct taxpayer support. The primary funding mechanisms for airports include federal grants through the Federal Aviation Authority’s (FAA) Airport Improvement Program, Passenger Facility Change local user fee, and tenant rents and fees (ACI-NA 2020). The fol- lowing text details funding sources for the major airports within the Collier Metropolitan Area. Based on the Naples Airport Master Plan (ESA 2020), a financial analysis was conducted to assess what projects in its proposed development program could be funded in the short- term planning period (FY 2020 through FY 2024). The analysis identified revenues from airport operations ($37.5 million), FAA Entitlement ($0.81 million) and Discretionary ($0.5 million) Grants, and FDOT Grants ($1.64 million). 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 912 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Cost Feasible Plan 6-1 Roadway Cost Feasible Projects 6-2 Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 6-3 Transit Cost Feasible Projects 6-4 Freight Network Projects 6-5 Airport Transportation Projects 6 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 913 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-1 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan This chapter summarizes the development of the 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan, which identifies the multimodal trans- portation projects that can be funded through 2045 based on the estimated revenues presented in Chapter 5. 6-1 Roadway Cost Feasible Projects Development of the cost feasible roadway projects began by estimating the costs associated with each project in the roadway needs. As detailed in the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Update Project Cost Development Methodology Technical Memorandum, planning-level costs were developed for each project phase including Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study, preliminary engineering/design (PE), ROW, construction (CST), and environmental mitigation. The project phase costs were developed using the FDOT 2045 LRTP Cost Estimation Tool and recent roadway project costs within the County. The cost components were applied to individual roadway projects from the Needs Plan to develop the roadway cost feasible projects for the LRTP. Once the projects were prioritized, the FDOT present-day cost inflation factors were applied to develop YOE costs for each project. Roadway Projects Prioritization As noted in Chapter 2, five alternative network scenarios were modeled using the D1RPM travel model. The first two network scenarios were not financially constrained and helped refine and develop the list of project needs. Alternative Network Scenarios 3 through 5 were modeled using an iterative process on a financially constrained list of projects to test travel demand and congestion throughout the network. These results of each network scenario test were shared with both the County and TAC/CAC during advisory meetings for input on projects to be included in the next model run. The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Update Scenario Network Modeling Technical Memorandum presents more details on the results of each network scenario modeled (provided under separate cover). Projects were also prioritized based on the project ranking in the Needs Plan, traffic modeling results, County input, and public input. Using the WikiMapping online interactive tool, the public selected their top five projects from the roadway needs and cost feasible projects and provided comments. Further details on this public outreach is presented in Chapter 2-4. The Collier MPO TIP and FDOT Work Program are updated annually and extend to 2025. The cost feasible projects presented in herein are consistent with the TIP and FDOT Work Program. Should funding for a project phase be identified sooner than anticipated in this LRTP, an amendment of this LRTP is required to reflect the consistency with the updated TIP. The roadway projects selected for inclusion in the Cost Feasible Plan are illustrated in the following maps and tables. As noted in Chapter 5, financial planning for statewide and metropolitan transportation plans is typically required for three periods: short range, intermediate range, and long range. Therefore, the cost feasible projects are presented in three multi-year planning periods: Fiscal Years (FY) 2026 to 2030, FY2031 to FY2035, and FY2036 to FY2045. Table 6-1 presents the SIS roadway cost feasible projects by planning year and project phase. Figure 6-1 presents a map of the projects and a distribution of the costs by phase. Table 6-2 presents the FDOT Other Roads Projects and Local Roadway Projects by planning year and project phase. Figures 6-2, 6-3, and 6-4 presents these projects by planning years including the distribution of costs by phase. Table 6-3 presents the partially funded projects within the FDOT Other Roads Projects and Local Roadway Projects, and Figure 6-5 presents a map of these projects for the entire planning period (FY2026 to FY2045). 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 914 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-2 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-1. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP SIS Cost Feasible Plan Projects Draft 9/21/2020 (in millions $) PRE-ENG ROW CST PRE-ENG ROW CST PRE-ENG ROW CST PRE-ENG ROW CST 92 SR 82 [4308481]Hendry Co.Line Gator Slough Lane Widen from 2-Lanes to 4- Lanes $44.73 0.07 $2.12 $42.54 $2.80 $2.80 50 SR 29 [4175406]New Market Road North North of SR-82 Widen from 2-Lanes to 4- Lanes (with center turn lane) $1.47 0.38 1.09 29.94 $29.94 51 SR 29/New Market Rd W - New Road [4175405] Immokalee Rd (CR 846)New Market Rd N New 4-Lane Road $6.74 0.06 $6.68 $5.88 $49.91 $55.78 52 SR 29 [4175404]Agriculture Way CR 846 E Widen from 2-Lanes to 4- Lanes $0.27 0.27 $5.63 $23.32 $28.95 29 I-75 (SR-93) Managed (Toll) Lanes [FPID 4425192] E of Collier Blvd (SR 951)Collier/Lee County Line New 4-Lane Express (Toll) Lanes (10-lanes) $0.03 0.03 63.25 145.43 $208.67 48 SR 29 [4344901]I-75 (SR 93)Oil Well Rd Widen from 2-Lane to 4 Lanes $0.03 0.03 4.33 $4.33 53 SR 29 (SEGMENT D) [4175403]Sunniland Nursery Rd Agriculture Way Widen from 2-Lanes to 4- Lanes $0.50 0.5 $2.38 $2.38 54 SR 29 (SEGMENT E) [4175402 Oil Well Rd Sunniland Nursery Rd Widen from 2-Lanes to 4- Lanes $8.33 8.33 $4.55 $4.55 46 SR 29 [4178784]SR 82 Hendry C/L Widen from 2-Lanes to 4- Lanes $1.37 0.07 $1.30 $0.00 Totals $63.47 $9.74 $11.19 $42.54 $0.00 $5.88 $32.74 $67.58 $12.55 $0.00 $0.00 $145.43 $73.22 $337.40 PRE-ENG PDC Present Day Cost ROW Right-of-Way CST Construction YOE Year of Expenditure Limits To Description TIP Funding 2021–25 (YOE) PRE-ENG includes PD&E and Design $63.47 $38.62 $80.13 $218.65 Plan Period 1 (TIP): 2020–2025 Plan Period 2: 2026–2030 Plan Period 3: 2031–2035 Plan Period 4: 2036–2045 Total Cost 2026–2045Map ID Facility (FPID No.)Limits From 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 915 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-3 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Figure 6-1. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP SIS Cost Feasible Plan Projects $0.00 $20.00 $40.00 $60.00 $80.00 $100.00 $120.00 $140.00 $160.00 $180.00 PRE-ENG ROW CST $67.58 $163.86 $105.97 Cost (millions $)Phase Cost by Phase FDOT SIS PROJECTS 2026-2045 ($ IN MILLIONS) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 916 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-4 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-2. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Projects – FDOT Other Roads Projects and Local Roadway Projects Draft 9/21/2020 (in millions $) PRE-ENG includes PD&E and Design Present Day Cost Right-of-Way Construction YOE Year of Expenditure 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 917 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-5 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Figure 6-2. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map (FY2026–FY2030) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 918 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-6 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Figure 6-3. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map (FY2031–FY2035) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 919 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-7 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Figure 6-4. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map (FY2036–FY2045) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 920 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-8 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-3. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Projects – Partially Funded Projects (FY2026–FY2045) Draft 9/21/2020 (in millions $) Notes: Partially funded for construction PRE-ENG includes PD&E and Design Present Day Cost Right-of-Way Construction YOE Year of Expenditure 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 921 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-9 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Figure 6-5. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map – Partially Funded (FY2026–FY2045) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 922 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-10 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Figures 6-6 and 6-7 present the total costs by project phase and funding source, respectively, for the FDOT Other Roads and Local Roads cost feasible projects for this 2045 LRTP update. Figure 6-6. Total Costs by Project Phase for FDOT Other Roads and Local Roads Funded Projects 2026–2045 (YOE $ in millions) Figure 6-7. Total Costs by Funding Source 2026–2045 (YOE $ in millions) Funding of Other Roadway Needs East of CR 951 Bridges As noted in Chapter 4, there are 10 proposed canal crossing bridges that are the subject of the 2020 East of CR 951 Bridge Reevaluation Study. A 1-cent infrastructure surtax with specific funding earmarked for constructing these new bridges will be available within the next 7 years. A total of $20.8 mil- lion in TMA (or SU) Funds is dedicated for bridge projects in the 2045 LRTP update: • Planning Period 2026 to 2030: $5.24 million for CST • Planning Period 2031 to 2035: $5.20 million for CST • Planning Period 2036 to 2045: $10.36 million for CST Congestion Management Projects Congestion management and ITS projects are generally short- term and immediate action projects. Therefore, their role in the LRTP process is modest and are more thoroughly addressed in the congestion management process. The current TIP includes several improvements to the traffic management center, arterial monitoring cameras, and other traffic equipment improvements that address safety, active roadway management, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Table 6-4 presents congestion management projects funded for construction in the 2021-2025 TIP. The Collier MPO identified congestion management priorities resulting from the TSPR and the Local Road Safety Plan (Tindale Oliver 2020d). Tables 6-5 and 6-6 present infra- structure and non-infrastructure multimodal strategies, respectively, that contribute to the MPO’s project selection process. $0.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 PRE-ENG ROW CST $170.61 $98.35 $801.52 Cost (millions $)Phase $541.55$443.20 $85.72 County OA (ROW and CST) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 923 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-11 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-4. Congestion Management Projects Funded in TIP ITS Projects Funded Amount TIP/CIP Year Bicycle Detection – City of Naples (refer to Figure 4-7 in Chapter 4) $66,429 CST 2024/25 ITS Fiber Optic and FPL Power Infrastructure at 13 locations $272,725 CST 2024/25 Travel Time Data Collection and Performance Measures $700,000 CST 2020/21 New Updated School Flasher System $353,250 CST 2024/25 New Vehicle Count Station Update (refer to Figure 4-7 in Chapter 4) $311,562 CST 2023/24 New ATCS at 13 signalized locations along Santa Barbara Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway (refer to Figure 4-7 in Chapter 4) $893,000 PE 2023/24 CST 2024/25 Source: Collier MPO 2020 Transportation System Performance Report & Action Plan Future congestion management projects will be prioritized through the MPO’s congestion management process. A total of $41.46 million in TMA (or SU) Funds is dedicated for future congestion management projects in the 2045 LRTP update: • Planning Period 2026 to 2030: $10.42 million for CST • Planning Period 2031 to 2035: $10.39 million for CST • Planning Period 2036 to 2045: $20.65 million for CST Maintenance Maintenance of the state roadways within the County and its associated municipalities is not included in this LRTP update. As noted in the FDOT’s 2045 Revenue Forecast for the Collier MPO, FDOT has included sufficient funding to meet the following statewide objectives and policies: • Resurfacing program: Ensure that 80 percent of state highway system pavement meets FDOT standards • Bridge program: Ensure that 90 percent of FDOT- maintained bridges meet Department standards while keeping all FDOT-maintained bridges open to the public safe • Operations and maintenance program: Achieve 100 percent of acceptable maintenance condition standard on the SHS • Product Support: Reserve funds for product support required to construct improvements (funded with the forecast’s capacity funds) in each FDOT district and metropolitan area • Administration: Administer the state transportation program Maintenance of County and its associated municipality’s roadways is funded primarily through fuel taxes and General Fund revenues. The maintenance programs primarily address routine maintenance operations that are preventive or corrective in nature and that address safety concerns. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 924 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-12 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-5. Infrastructure Strategies Matrix Infrastructure Strategies Non- Motorized Intersection Lane Departure Same Direction Speed Management X X X X Alternative Intersections (ICE Process) X X X Intersection Design Best Practices for Pedestrians X Median Restrictions/Access Management X X Right Turn Lanes ? X Signal Coordination ? X Rural Road Strategies Including: • Paved shoulder X X • Safety Edge X • Curve geometry, delineation, and warning X • Bridge/culvert widening/attenuation X • Guard Rail/ditch regrading/tree clearing X • Isolated intersection conspicuity/geometry X Shared Use Pathways, Sidewalk Improvements X Mid-Block Crossings & Median Refuge X Intersection Lighting Enhancements X X X Autonomous vehicles (longer term) TBD X X X Source: Collier MPO Local Road Safety Plan (Tindale Oliver 2020d) Notes: X = Applicable Strategy ? = Possible Contra-indications 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 925 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-13 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-6. Non-Infrastructure Strategies Matrix Infrastructure Strategies Intersection Lane Departure Non-Motorized Rear End/ Sideswipe Traffic Enforcement Targeted Speed Enforcement X X X X Red Light Running Enforcement X X Automated Enforcement X ? Pedestrian Safety Enforcement X Bike Light and Retroreflective Material Give-Away X Young Driver Education X X X X WalkWise/BikeSmart or Similar Campaign X Continuing Education X X X X Safety Issue Reporting X X X X Vision Zero Policy X X X X Source: Collier MPO Local Road Safety Plan (Tindale Oliver 2020d) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 926 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-14 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Unfunded Roadway Needs While the projects included in the roadway Cost Feasible Plan will address many of the congestion, safety, and capacity issues forecasted for 2045, financial resources are limited. Therefore, a number of unfunded projects in the 2045 roadway Needs Plan are not addressed in this Cost Feasible Plan. Table 6-7 summarizes projects included in the roadway Needs Plan that are unfunded in this 2045 LRTP update. 6-2 Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects The BPMP noted in Chapter 4 is a systems plan that focuses on identifying the needs and a policy framework for prioritization and implementation of bicycle and pedestrian projects. Further, it provides maximum flexibility in bringing projects forward for funding and offers design guidelines based on best practices that implementing agencies may use as guidance. Therefore, implementation of these projects is more thoroughly addressed through the individual agencies and the MPO bicycle and pedestrian advisory process. The BPMP provided planning-level project costs for the bicycle and pedestrian projects presented in Chapter 4. These costs did not include costs for ROW or drainage. An engineering cost estimate would be required for submission of a project for prioritization consideration. Table 6-8 lists the costs associated with priority projects presented in Chapter 4 (Table 4-9) and the figure in Appendix C (Existing + Proposed). These costs are by order of magnitude and are for constructing different combinations of bicycle and pedestrian facilities on the road segments associated with the bicycle and pedestrian priority projects. It is anticipated that this process will be continued throughout the period of the long-range transportation plan, with an annual updating of priorities for inclusion in the TIP by the BPAC. A total of $41.46 million in TMA/TA (or SU/TALU) Funds is dedicated for future pedestrian and bicycle projects in the 2045 LRTP update: •Planning Period 2026 to 2030 - $10.42 Million for CST •Planning Period 2031 to 2035 - $10.39 Million for CST •Planning Period 2036 to 2045 - $20.65 Million for CST 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 927 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-15 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-7. Collier County 2045 LRTP - Unfunded Needs Projects Map ID Project From To Project Description 2 Benfield Rd. US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) Rattlesnake-Hammock Extension New 2-Lane Road (Expandable to 4-Lanes) 3 Big Cypress Parkway North of I-75 Golden Gate Blvd. New 2-Lane Road (Expandable to 4-Lanes) 4 Big Cypress Parkway Golden Gate Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension New 2-Lane Road (Expandable to 4-Lanes) 6 Big Cypress Parkway Oil Well Rd. Immokalee Rd. New 2-Lane Road (Expandable to 4-Lanes) 7 Camp Keais Rd. Pope John Paul Blvd. Oil Well Road Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 8 Camp Keais Rd. Immokalee Rd. Pope John Paul Blvd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 10 CR 951 Extension Collier Blvd. (CR 951) (northern terminus) Lee/Collier County Line New 2-Lane Road 13 Everglades Blvd. Golden Gate Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd Extension Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 14 Everglades Blvd. I-75 (SR-93)Golden Gate Blvd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 15 Golden Gate Blvd. Everglades Blvd. Desoto Blvd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 16 Golden Gate Blvd. Extension Desoto Blvd. Big Cypress Parkway New 4-Lane Road 18 Green Blvd. Santa Barbara/Logan Blvd. Sunshine Blvd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 19 Green Boulevard Extension (16th Ave SW) 23rd St. SW Wilson Blvd. Extension (Corridor Study) New 2-Lane (Future Study Area) 20 Green Boulevard Extension (16th Ave SW) CR 951 23rd St. SW (Corridor Study) New 4-Lane (Future Study Area) 21 Green Boulevard Extension (16th Ave SW) Wilson Blvd. Ext Everglades Blvd. (Corridor Study) New 2-Lane Road 27 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange (new)Vanderbilt Beach Rd. New Interchange - Partial (to/from the North) 30 Immokalee Rd. (CR 846) Camp Keais Rd. Carver St. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 32 Keane Ave. Inez Rd. Wilson Blvd. Extension New 2-Lane Road (Future Study Area) 34 Logan Blvd. Green Blvd. Pine Ridge Rd. Widen from 4 Lanes to 6 Lanes 35 Logan Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Immokalee Rd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 38 Oil Well Road / CR 858 Ave Maria Entrance Camp Keais Rd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 6 Lanes 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 928 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-16 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-7. Collier County 2045 LRTP - Unfunded Needs Projects Map ID Project From To Project Description 40 Orange Blossom Dr. Airport Pulling Rd. Livingston Rd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 43 Randall Blvd. Everglades Blvd. Desoto Blvd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 44 Randall Blvd. Desoto Blvd. Big Cypress Parkway New 4-Lane Road 45 Santa Barbara Blvd. Painted Leaf Ln. Green Blvd. Widen from 4 Lanes to 6 Lanes 67 Veterans Memorial Blvd. Extension Strand Blvd. I-75 New 4-Lane Road 68 Big Cypress Parkway Intersection (new) Oil Well Grade Rd. New At-Grade Intersection 70 Green Blvd. Extension Everglades Blvd. Big Cypress Parkway New 2-Lane Road 73 Immokalee Rd. (CR 846) Intersection Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Major Intersection Improvement 75 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange (new)Veterans Memorial Blvd. New Partial Interchange 76 Vanderbilt Dr. Immokalee Rd. Woods Edge Parkway Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 95 Golden Gate Parkway (Intersection) Goodlette Rd Major Intersection Improvement 96 Pine Ridge Road (Intersection) Airport Pulling Rd. Major Intersection Improvement 100 Collier Boulevard (Intersection) Pine Ridge Rd. Major Intersection Improvement 107 Golden Gate Pkwy. Collier Blvd. Major Intersection Improvement 108 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Airport Pulling Rd. Intersection Innovation/Improvements 109 Immokalee Rd. Goodlette-Frank Rd. Intersection Innovation/Improvements 110 Immokalee Rd. Airport Pulling Rd. Intersection Innovation/Improvements 112 Airport Pulling Rd. Orange Blossom Intersection Innovation/Improvements 113 Airport Pulling Rd. Golden Gate Pkwy. Intersection Innovation/Improvements 114 Airport Pulling Rd. Radio Rd. Intersection Innovation/Improvements 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 929 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-17 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-8. Costs of Priority Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects by Mileage Totals Component Mileage Cost Per Mile Total Cost Shared use paths and bike lanes on both sides of roadway 122 $1,104,000 $135 million Bicycle lanes on both sides; shared use path on one side, sidewalk on the other 122 $972,000 $119 million Bicycle lanes and sidewalks on both sides of roadway 122 $840,000 $103 million Bicycle lanes on both sides; shared use path on one side 122 $818,000 $100 million Bike lanes on both sides, sidewalk on one side 122 $686,000 $84 million Source: Collier MPO 2020 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan 6-3 Transit Cost Feasible Projects Similar to the development of roadway cost feasible projects, the cost feasible transit projects were developed by estimating the costs associated with each project in the transit needs. Transit Cost Assumptions Numerous cost assumptions were made to forecast transit costs for 2021 through 2045. Costs include annual service and technology/capital improvements that are programmed for implementation within the plan period. The following subsections summarize assumptions for capital and operating costs noted in the TDP. Operating Cost Assumptions Operating cost assumptions are based on a variety of factors, including service performance data from CAT and information from the recent Collier MPO TDP. These assumptions are summarized as follows: • Annual operating costs for fixed-route and paratransit services are based on the most recent validated National Transit Database data. • An annual inflation rate of 1.8 percent was used for all operating cost projections based on the average Consumer Price Index historical data from 2009-2019. • Some funds (for example, FTA Section 5307 funds) increase above the inflation rate of 1.8 percent and are commensurate with the increase in operating costs for new services. • Annual operating costs for future service enhancements are based on the projected annual service hours and cost per revenue hour of $82.32 for fixed-route service and $63.91 for paratransit service (both in 2018 dollars). • Implementing the new route alignments represents increased levels of service in such improvements as Route 14, 19/28, and Route 23 with no additional costs. • Express routes and MOD would not require complementary Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) paratransit services if implemented. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 930 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-18 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Capital Cost Assumptions Service assumptions were also developed to estimate the costs for capital needs described in Chapter 4 and are summarized as follows: •Replacement of vehicles within the existing fleet that have reached the end of their useful life and vehicles to implement new service. •Vehicles are assumed to cost $495,000 for fixed-route bus and $71,217 for paratransit vehicles. A total of 21 fixed- route vehicles and 58 paratransit vehicles will need to be purchased between 2020 and 2030. •An annual growth rate of 1.8 percent was used for capital cost projections. •A 20-percent spare ratio was factored into the vehicle replacement and expansion schedule. •A useful life for bus and paratransit vehicle replacement is 12 years and 7 years, respectively. •Bus shelter expenses were assumed to be the same funding levels obtained from the FY2021 Collier County Government Requested Budget with an annual inflation rate of 1.8 percent. •Technology costs were obtained from the draft budget for FY2020 Federal Transit Authority Section 5307 and 5339 Program of Projects Draft budget. Based on the funding availability and prioritized results, the transit cost feasible projects are summarized in Table 6-9 and illustrated in Figure 6-8. Table 6-9. 2045 Transit Cost Feasible Summary Route Location TDP 2021–2030 LRTP 2031–2045 Funded Operating/Capital Cost (YOE) Funded Operating/Capital Cost (YOE) Proposed Realignment Changes Route 11 – Extend to Walmart Shopping Center X $0/$0 Route 12 – Extend to Walmart Shopping Center X $0/$0 Route 13 and 14 – Realign from one-way pair to two bidirectional routes X $0/$0 Routes 17 and 18 – Combine portion of the two routes along and remove service along Tamiami Trail X $0/$0 Routes 19 and 28 – Realign unproductive segments and combine service hours with Route 28 for increased frequency X $0/$0 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 931 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-19 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-9. 2045 Transit Cost Feasible Summary Route Location TDP 2021–2030 LRTP 2031–2045 Funded Operating/Capital Cost (YOE) Funded Operating/Capital Cost (YOE) Route 20 and 26 – Combine to improve frequency and streamline service. X $0/$0 Route 21 (Marco Island Express) – Provide express service to the Walmart Supercenter on Collier Blvd. and Tamiami Trail X $0/$0 Route 22 – Realign to streamline circulation in Immokalee and extend service to high employment centers X $0/$0 Route 23 – Realign to provide direct connections to residential cluster on Lake Trafford Road, and Farm Workers Way X $0/$0 Route 25 EW – No service change X $0/$0 Route 25 NS – Extend to Immokalee Road Route 27 NS – Extend service south Route 27 EW – Extend service east Proposed Frequency Changes Route 11 – 30 min to 20 min X $17,215,415/$0 Route 12 – 25/90 min to 30 min and 60 min at off-peak X $7,460,013/$0 Route 13 – 40 min to 30 min Route 14 – 60 min to 30 min Route 15 and 16 – 90 min to 45 min Route 19/28 – 165 min to 60 min 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-20 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-9. 2045 Transit Cost Feasible Summary Route Location TDP 2021–2030 LRTP 2031–2045 Funded Operating/Capital Cost (YOE) Funded Operating/Capital Cost (YOE) Route 23 – 60 min to 40 min X $3,805,909/$503,771 Route 24- 85 min to 60 min X $2,045,921/$503,771 Route 121 – Add two morning and evening trips during peak periods X (Partial – one AM and one PM) $1,632,384/$503,771 Proposed Span Improvements Route 11, 13, 14, 17/18, 1 – Extend to 10 p.m. X $1,808,329/$0 Route 19/28, Route 24 – Extend to 10 p.m. Proposed New Service Routes New Island Trolley New UF/IFAS and Lehigh Acres Route New Bayshore Shuttle New Downtown Autonomous Circulator New Naples Pier Electric Shuttle Mobility-On-Demand Express Premium Route to Lee County Capital Infrastructure Regionwide Technology X (Partial) $0/$2,720,920 Security – driver protection barriers X $0/$153,080 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-21 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-9. 2045 Transit Cost Feasible Summary Route Location TDP 2021–2030 LRTP 2031–2045 Funded Operating/Capital Cost (YOE) Funded Operating/Capital Cost (YOE) Bus Shelters Shelter Rehabilitations Technical Studies X $0/$100,000 Improve ADA Accessibility Replace and Add New Vehicles Park-and-Ride Lots (pending study) CAT Bus and Maintenance Buildinga X $0/$11,275,000 a FY 2020/21 through FY 2024/25 TIP Amendment – FTA Grant Award (5339B Funding) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 934 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-22 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Figure 6-8. 2045 Transit Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 935 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-23 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan 6-4 Freight Network Projects FDOT updated its Freight Mobility and Trade Plan (FMTP) in April 2020.1 The FMTP is a comprehensive plan that identifies freight transportation facilities critical to the state’s economic growth and guides multimodal freight investments in the state. The FMTP identified freight hotspots as presented in Figure 6-9. Collier County has low to medium freight activity along the I-75 corridor. According to the data from the FMTP, there are two Freight Intensive Areas in the County: East Naples Industrial area and the Immokalee Airport Industrial area. A Freight Intensive Area is a cluster or group of freight facilities that generates, distributes, or attracts large amounts of freight activities and has a significant impact on Florida’s transportation system and economy. Out of 70 Freight Intensive Areas within the state, the East Naples and Immokalee Airport areas ranked 42nd and 43rd, respectively, by total freight parcel floor area. The FMTP Technical Memorandum 6, Project Prioritization and Selection (FDOT 2020b) presents the methodology and the freight project selection and prioritization process. Noted on the list of prioritized projects in the FMTP as a low priority were the I-75 at CR 846 (Immokalee Road) and I-75 at Pine Ridge Road interchange modification projects. All projects listed in Table 6-1, 2045 SIS Cost Feasible Projects, are part of the Regional Freight Mobility Corridors within the Collier MPO boundary (refer to Figure 4-4 in Chapter 4). A total of 20 of the cost feasible projects identified in this 2045 LRTP Update are on the freight network within Collier MPO boundary. 1 https://www.fdot.gov/rail/plandevel/freight-mobility-and-trade-plan Figure 6-9. Freight Hotspot Locations 6-5 Airport Transportation Projects As noted in Chapter 4, two off-airport transportation projects were identified in the roadway Needs Plan to improve access to Naples Airport and Immokalee Regional Airport. Project no. 31, Immokalee Road from Airpark Boulevard to SR 29, has been identified as cost feasible for construction in FY2036 to FY2045. The project includes widening Immokalee Road from two to four lanes and will improve traffic operations and access to the industrial warehouses within the property of the Immokalee Regional Airport. Approximately $7.2 million has been dedicated to this off-airport roadway project in the Cost Feasible Plan using County funds. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 936 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-24 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Naples Airport estimates their development costs for airport operations at $56.8 million for short term (2020–2024), $67 million for intermediate (2025–2029), and $83 million for long term (2030–2039) expenses, for a total of $206.9 million. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Implementation 7-1 Implementation Framework 7-2 2045 LRTP Performance Measures and Targets 7-3 Planning Programs 7 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 7-1 Chapter 7 Implementation Chapter 7 Implementation The Collier MPO is responsible for implementing the invest- ments and strategies included in this LRTP. This chapter describes how the MPO will implement the LRTP investments in coordination with federal, state, and local partners. Major planning partners for the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update include the Collier MPO Board and committees; Collier County, the cities of Naples, Marco Island, and Everglades City; FDOT; MPO Adviser Network; local tribal governments; and Lee County (through the Lee County MPO Interlocal Agreement). 7-1 Implementation Framework The LRTP reflects and guides Collier MPO’s commitment to ensuring the priority projects, programs, and policies are carried out successfully, while complying with transportation planning and requirements as described in federal authorizing legislation. As noted in Chapter 1, the FAST Act requires a Continuing, Cooperative, and Comprehensive long-range planning process. As part of this process, FHWA and FTA jointly issued a Planning Rule 1 requiring MPOs to establish targets for federally developed performance measures to evaluate the regional transportation system presented in their LRTPs. Performance-based planning ensures the most efficient investment of transportation funds by increasing account- ability, providing transparency, and linking investment decisions to key outcomes related to the seven national goals outlined in Chapter 1. Under this framework, the three FHWA performance measures (PMs) rules and the FTA transit asset management 1 The Final Rule modified 23 CFR Part 450 and 49 CFR Part 613. and transit safety rules established various performance measures to assess roadway safety (PM1), pavement and bridge condition (PM2), system performance and freight movement (PM3), transit asset management, and transit safety. The Planning Rule and the PM rules also specify how MPOs should set targets, report performance, and integrate performance management into their LRTP and TIP. Table 7-1 presents the federal performance measures and the targets adopted by the Collier MPO Board. System Performance Report FHWA requires that MPOs prepare a System Performance Report (SPR) every 5 years and include the report with the LRTP. The SPR includes performance measures required for all MPOs across the country, which allows for clear and con- sistent comparisons across planning areas. In response, FDOT developed an SPR template for each Florida MPO. The SPR evaluates the condition and performance of the transporta- tion system with respect to required performance targets, and reports on progress achieved in meeting the targets in comparison with baseline data and previous reports. The SPR includes five categories of system performance. These measures are focused largely on the highway and major road- way network receiving the majority of federal transportation funding. These categories include: • Highway Safety • Bridge and Pavement • System Performance • Transit Asset Management • Transit Safety (planning only) 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 939 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 7-2 Chapter 7 Implementation Table 7-1. Collier MPO Adopted Performance Measures and Targets Measure Target Safety (PM1) Fatalities 0 Serious Injurious 0 Fatality Rate 0 Injury Rate 0 Nonmotorized Fatalities & Serious Injuries 0 Pavement (PM2) Condition of NHS Interstate Pavements ≥60% in good condition in 4 years <5% in poor condition in 4 years Condition of NHS Non- Interstate Pavement ≥40% in good condition in 2 & 4 years <5% in poor condition in 2 & 4 years Bridge (PM2) NHS Bridge Deck Area Condition ≥50% in good condition in 2 & 4 years <10% in poor condition in 2 & 4 years Measure Target System Performance (PM3) % of Person-Miles on the Interstate that are reliable ≥75% in 2 years ≥70% in 4 years % Person-Miles on Non-Interstate NHS that are reliable N/A in 2 years ≥50% in 4 years Truck Travel Time Reliability Index ≤1.75 in 2 years ≤2.0 in 4 years Transit Asset Management Transit Rolling Stock 10% have met or exceeded ULB Transit Equipment ≤25% have met or exceeded ULB Transit Facilities 25% of facilities <3.0 on FTA's Transit Economic Requirements Model scale (1 [Poor] to 5 [Excellent]) Notes: NHS = National Highway System ULB = Useful Life Benchmark 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 940 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 7-3 Chapter 7 Implementation MPO partners and constituents can review current and past SPRs by visiting the respective MPO website and by attending public MPO meetings in which the reports are reviewed and adopted. The first Collier MPO 2020 SPR is included in this 2045 LRTP update as Appendix F. The SPR is comparable to the Collier MPO Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Report, which also presents ongoing improvements and monitoring. Federal Planning Factor Consistency The LRTP goals and objectives discussed in Chapter 3 incor- porate the federal planning factors required for all MPOs to address through planning. Table 7-2 illustrates which 2045 LRTP goals meet the federal planning factor requirements. The Collier MPO added a new transit priority project in 2019 to purchase a replacement bus for the CAT system, con- tributing $500,000 in MPO funds specifically to address the Transit Asset Management Performance Plan target for rolling stock. The MPO included the same amount in its newly adopted transit priorities for 2020. 7-2 Planning Programs The Collier MPO implements the LRTP through short- and long-term transportation plans and through programs and projects, which is done in partnership with the County and associated municipalities that design, develop, and deliver policies, programs, and infrastructure projects identified in the LRTP. As noted earlier, this LRTP update incorporates other plans by reference including the BPMP, TDP, CMP, TSPR, and the Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP). Each plan creates foundations for the LRTP by containing in-depth analysis and public processes from which the long-range planning builds a comprehensive and coordinated regional, multimodal vision. The LRTP reflects the needs and prioritized strategies identified in these plans in the needs and cost feasible project lists. Planning partners will look to these plans for implementation analysis and guidance. Figure 7-1 presents the plans that are incorporated by reference into the LRTP, their update cycle, and how they ultimately inform the TIP and UPWP. Figure 7-1 also presents a timeline of Collier MPO’s programs and plans from the 2045 LRTP adoption to the 2050 LRTP update and adoption. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 7-4 Chapter 7 Implementation Table 7-2. LRTP Goals and Federal Planning Factors Federal Planning Factors Goal 1 Ensure the Security of the Transportation System for Users Goal 2: Protect Environmental Resources Goal 3: Improve System Continuity and Connectivity Goal 4: Reduce Roadway Congestion Goal 5: Promote Freight Movement Goal 6: Increase the Safety of the Transportation System for Users Goal 7: Promote Multimodal Solutions Goal 8: Promote the Integrated Planning of Transportation and Land Use Goal 9: Promote Sustainability in the Planning of Transportation and Land Use Goal 10: Consider Climate Change Vulnerability and Risk in Transportation Safety  Security  Accessibility & Mobility     Multimodal Connectivity    System Preservation  Economic Vitality   Environmental Quality   System Efficiency    Resiliency & Reliability    Transit & Tourism   10.A.1 Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 7-5 Chapter 7 Implementation Figure 7-1. Collier MPO Plans and Programs Timeline 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 943 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 7-6 Chapter 7 Implementation Other Implementing Programs Collier MPO provides six programs to implement planning and development strategies identified in the LRTP. These programs typically result in the plans that are incorporated by reference into the LRTP, but may also include funding grant programs, initiatives, data collection, public information, and other activities and resources for local and partner agencies. Each is described briefly as follows. Traffic Safety Collier MPO leads initiatives and planning processes to continually improve motorized and non-motorized transpor- tation safety on federal, state, and local facilities. The MPO produced the LRSP that prioritized safety improvements on locally owned roadways and includes input from the FDOT Community Traffic Safety Team, law enforcement agencies, FDOT, and other state and federal planning partners. Bicycle and Pedestrian In addition to developing the BPMP, the Collier MPO along with Blue Zones installed a bicycle/pedestrian counter to aid in bicycle and pedestrian data collection on Bayshore Drive for the Bayshore Drive CRA. The MPO also has completed multiple walkable community studies as well as the Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Study that analyzed travel trends and crashes to better plan for future investments. Critical information gathered during the course of these studies is shared with its planning partners. Congestion Management Collier MPO convenes the CMC to oversee implementation of the CMP and related planning activities. The CMP along with the TSPR inform multimodal traffic safety concerns within the County and its municipalities. The MPO coordinates with state partners to update data and modeling tools to better understand traffic demand and safety conditions. Transit Collier MPO works with the County to ensure that CAT plans are coordinated with partner agencies’ plans and comply with federal and state requirements that ensure sustainable operations and maintains compliance with state and federal funding program requirements. The MPO also produces or coordinates transit-related plans and studies, including comprehensive operational analyses, transit impact analyses, Public Transit-Human Service Transportation Plan (referenced as the Collier MPO Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan), a park-and-ride study, and the TDP. Freight Collier MPO works to enhance the integration and con- nectivity of transportation systems and the movement of goods and commodities through freight. The Collier MPO staff participate in regional meetings with freight industry representatives hosted by the FDOT District One Freight Coordinator. The FDOT District One Freight Mobility & Trade Plan (FDOT 2020b) notes that Collier County’s top import and export commodity flow is the bulk movement of boxcars with more than 1.1 million tons imported and more than 650,000 tons imported. Additionally, Collier County is one of the top three counties in District One for vegetables, tomatoes, and watermelons harvested by acreage. Aviation As noted in Chapter 4, five public airports serve the Collier MPO planning area. With the exception of the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport (just west of the Miami-Dade County line), the Collier MPO coordinates with the airport authorities for off-airport transportation needs. Further, the 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 944 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 7-7 Chapter 7 Implementation Naples and Collier County Airport Authorities submit annual aviation project priorities to the MPO via Joint Automated Capital Improvement Programs for each airport within the Collier MPO’s planning area. Other Collier Metropolitan Area Projects The Collier MPO also implements plans by participating and contributing to major projects in the region. They include regionally significant plans, studies, and project development and delivery tasks. Several ongoing efforts are described as follows. Lee County MPO Rail Feasibility In October 2013, the Lee County MPO finalized the Lee County Rail Corridor Feasibility Study (David Plummer & Associates et al. 2013) to analyze multimodal transportation options in the existing rail corridor in Lee and northern Collier County. Trans- portation alternatives included freight service, commuter or light rail transit, BRT, and/or multi-use paths. The Lee MPO is coordinating with Collier County Transportation Planning and the Collier MPO throughout the study. The Lee County MPO is currently embarking on a detailed trail feasibility study for the Lee County portion of this trail north- ward as far as Alico Road. The Seminole Gulf Railway, which terminates in northern Collier County, purchased the ROW from CSX in 2018, after 30 years of leasing the corridor from them. A trail along the rail corridor from Bonita Beach Road north is now part of Florida’s SunTrail Network. The trail is planned to run east of the railroad along Bonita Beach Road, then south along the Livingston Road corridor into Collier County. M-CORES Created by Section 338.2278, F.S., the M-CORES Program seeks to revitalize rural communities, encourage job creation, and provide regional connectivity while leveraging technology, enhancing quality of life and public safety, and protecting the environment and natural resources. FDOT is responsible for organizing task forces to study three specific corridors detailed as follows and presented on Figure 7-2: • The Suncoast Corridor (from Citrus County to Jefferson County) • The Northern Turnpike Corridor (from the northern terminus of Florida’s Turnpike northwest to the Suncoast Parkway) • The Southwest-Central Florida Corridor (from Collier County to Polk County) The goal of the M-CORES Program involves advancing the construction of regional corridors that accommodate multiple modes of transportation and multiple types of infrastructure. The Southwest-Central Florida Corridor study area spans nine counties, from Collier County to Polk County, as shown on Figure 7-2. The Collier MPO area is part of the Southwest- Central Florida Corridor study area. M-CORES projects are projects of regional significance and, therefore, must be included in the LRTP, TIP, and the STIP [per 23 CFR Part 450.324(d) and Section 339.175(7), F.S.]. The 2045 LRTP update did not include any M-CORES projects as none has been developed as of the publication of this document. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 945 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 7-8 Chapter 7 Implementation MPOs and transportation planning organizations within an M-CORES study area are responsible for actively involving all affected parties in an open, cooperative, and collaborative process when developing LRTPs and TIPs. Regional coordination is required because M-CORES projects affect multiple MPOs. Public participation required for the development of LRTP and TIP is neither affected nor replaced by the public engagement activities conducted as part of the M-CORES corridor development process. Collier MPO will use travel demand forecasts generated by the Florida Turnpike Statewide Model for M-CORES projects. As such, Collier MPO will coordinate all M-CORES-related analyses with FDOT for consistency purposes. The proposed projects in the Southwest-Central Florida Corridor will be tolled facilities and will be part of the Florida’s Turnpike system and the SIS. The projects will be included in the LRTP and TIP/STIP in accordance with guidance provided in the FDOT MPO Program Management Handbook (FDOT 2019c). FDOT is working with the Southwest-Central Florida Corridor Task Force to develop purpose and need, guiding principles, and potential paths/courses. The Collier MPO is a member of the Southwest-Central Florida Corridor Task Force and is actively engaged in pertinent aspects of planning and corridor analysis through the Task Force activities. The Task Force will submit its evaluation report to the governor, the president of the senate, and the speaker of the house of representatives by November 15, 2020. As the program progresses to PD&E, design, and construction phases, FDOT will identify projects, prepare cost estimates, and coordinate with Collier MPO to add identified projects into the LRTP and TIP. Subject to the economic and environmental feasibility statement requirements of Section 337.25, F.S., projects may be funded through Turnpike revenue bonds or ROW and bridge construction bonds or financing by the Florida Department of Transportation Financing Corporation; by advances from the State Transportation Trust Fund; with funds obtained through the creation of public-private partnerships; or any combination thereof. FDOT also may accept donations of land for use as transportation ROW or to Figure 7-2. M-CORES Study Area 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 946 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 7-9 Chapter 7 Implementation secure or use transportation ROW for such projects in accordance with Section 337.25, F.S. To the maximum extent feasible, construction of the M-CORES projects will begin no later than December 31, 2022, and the corridors will be open to traffic no later than December 31, 2030. I-75 Connect (South Corridor) Study FDOT Is embarking on a program that will lead to the long- term build out of the interstate corridors in Southwest Florida, first envisioned by prior planning studies. This capacity improvement project involves the potential construction of managed lanes in each direction on I-75, from east of Collier Boulevard (SR 951) in Collier County to Bayshore Road (SR 78) in Lee County. Additional general-use lanes, collector- distributor roadways, and auxiliary lanes, as well as interchange operational improvements, are also being considered. As such, up to a 12-lane typical section is being explored. There are opportunities to operate reliable, efficient transit service within the managed lanes, as well as provide connections to park-and-ride or kiss-and-ride lots located within the project area. Further, there is opportunity to provide improved or new bicycle and pedestrian accommodations as well as landscaping/streetscaping treatments on roadways connecting to or passing under the interstate to enhance bicycle and pedestrian circulation and access to area transit service. While the proposed improvements are anticipated to be constructed primarily within the existing ROW, some additional ROW may be required, particularly around the interchanges. Specific ROW requirements will be determined during the PD&E study phase. Within the Collier MPO planning area, the interchanges at Immokalee Road, Pine Ridge Road, Golden Gate Parkway, and Collier Boulevard are being studied. The study is expected to be complete by the fourth quarter of 2022. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 947 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation References8 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 948 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 8-1 Chapter 8 References Chapter 8 References Airports Council International-North America (ACI-NA). 2020. Airport Infrastructure Funding. Accessed October 2020. https://airportscouncil.org/advocacy/airport-infrastructure-funding. City of Everglades City. 2019. Everglades Town Trail Master Plan. January. City of Marco Island. 2009. Comprehensive Plan: Goals, Objectives and Policies. Amended December 7. Accessed August 2020. https://www.cityofmarcoisland.com/sites/default/files/fileattachm ents/growth_management/page/5551/compplanpart1_2009.pdf. City of Marco Island. 2018. Marco Island Bike Path Master Plan. Adopted April 16. Accessed August 2020. https://www.cityofmarcoisland.com/sites/default/files/fileattachm ents/ordinance/54821/18-30.pdf. City of Marco Island. 2020. Present Day Marco Island. Accessed October 13. https://www.cityofmarcoisland.com/community/ page/present-day-marco-island. City of Naples. 2010. Comprehensive Plan. Amended October 20. Accessed August 2020. https://www.naplesgov.com/sites/default/files/fileattachments/pla nning/page/4451/comprehensive_plan_120613_201312060904513 380.pdf. City of Naples. 2019. City of Naples Planning Advisory Board Vision 2020 Analysis and Recommendations. September 11. https://www.naplesgov.com/sites/default/files/fileattachments/plan ning/page/27021/pab_city_of_naples_vision_report_9.11.2019.pdf. City of Naples. 2020. Adopted Budget City of Naples, Florida Fiscal Year 2020-2021. Accessed October 13. https://www.naplesgov.com /sites/default/files/fileattachments/finance/page/8031/20- 21_adopted_budget_-_final.pdf. Collier Area Transit (CAT) and Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). Forthcoming. Park & Ride Study. Collier County Airport Authority. 2017. Immokalee Regional Airport Layout Plan Update. August. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=75385. Collier County Growth Management Department. 2019. Annual Update & Inventory Report/Capital Improvement Element Schedule Update on Public Facilities. Prepared for Collier County Board of County Commissioners. November. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=91644. Collier County Planning and Zoning Department. 2017. Collier County Growth Management Plan, Transportation Element. Prepared for Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Amended June. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=74327. Collier County Planning and Zoning Department. 2019. Collier County Growth Management Plan, Future Land Use Element. Prepared for Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Amended November. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=91408. Collier County. 2017. Collier County Community Housing Plan. Final Draft. October 24. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=74936 Collier County. 2019. Collier One-Cent Sales Tax. Accessed August 2020. https://collieronecenttax.com/. Collier County. 2020a. Collier County Planning Communities [map]. January. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=28844. Collier County. 2020a. Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program FY2021-FY2025. June. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp- content/uploads/FY21-25-TIP-Adopted-June-12-2020-AS- AMENDED-ADMIN.MODIFIEDv2.pdf. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 949 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 8-2 Chapter 8 References Collier County. 2020b. Growth Management Plan (Current). Accessed July 2020. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your- government/divisions-a-e/comprehensive-planning/growth- management-plan-current. Collier County. 2020b. Immokalee Regional Airport. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your- government/divisions-a-e/airport-authority/immokalee-regional- airport. Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (Collier MPO). 2017. Congestion Management Process 2017 Update. October. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp- content/uploads/2017-CMP.pdf. Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (Collier MPO). 2018. Collier 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. Final. Amended May 25. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp- content/uploads/2018/11/2040-LRTP-as-Amended.pdf. Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (Collier MPO). 2019a. Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan. March 8. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Bicycle- and-Pedestrian-Master-Plan-2019-Final.pdf. Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (Collier MPO). 2019b. Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Report. December. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp-content/uploads/2019-Annual- Report-FINAL.pdf. Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (Collier MPO). 2020. Transportation Improvement Plan FY2021 - FY2025. Adopted June 12, 2020. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp-content/uploads/FY21- 25-TIP-Adopted-June-12-2020-AS-AMENDED- ADMIN.MODIFIEDv2.pdf. Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (Collier MPO). Forthcoming. 2045 LRTP Update Project Cost Development Methodology Technical Memorandum. David Plummer & Associates, Inc., Spikowski Planning Associates, David Douglas Associates, Inc., HDR Engineering, Inc., and RMI Midwest. 2013. Lee County Rail Corridor Feasibility Study. October 25. Accessed October 2020. http://leempo.com/wp- content/uploads/2017/03/Rail-Corridor-Feasibility-Study_Final- Report_.pdf. Environmental Science Associates (ESA). 2020. Naples Airport Master Plan. Draft. February 29. Prepared for City of Naples Airport Authority. https://flynaples.com/wp- content/uploads/2020/04/APF-MP-Consolidated-Draft-Report- February-29-2020.pdf. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2018. Federal Strategies for Implementing Requirements for LRTP Updates for the Florida MPOs. January. Accessed August 2020. https://www.fdot.gov/docs/default- source/planning/Policy/metrosupport/Resources/LRTP- Expectations-2018.pdf. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2017. Resilience and Transportation Planning. Accessed August 2020. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/sustainability/ resilience/publications/ratp/index.cfm. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2020. Congestion Management Process (CMP). Accessed August 2020. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/plan4ops/focus_areas/cmp.htm. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2016. Shared-Use Nonmotorized (SUN) Trail Program. https://www.fdot.gov/planning/systems/SUNTrail.shtm. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2017. Tentative Five Year Work Program, Fiscal Years 2019-2023. Collier County. Draft. October. Accessed August 2020. http://swflroads.com/D1EpublicHearing/documents/Collier.pdf. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 950 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 8-3 Chapter 8 References Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2018a. Guidance for Assessing Planning Impacts and Opportunities of Automated, Connected, Electric and Shared-Use Vehicles. September. Accessed August 2020. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/ sitefinity/docs/default-source/planning/policy/metrosupport/ resources/fdot_mpoguidebook_20181005.pdf. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2018b. Revenue Forecasting Guidebook. July 3. Accessed August 2020. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default- source/content/planning/revenueforecast/revenue-forecasting- guidebook.pdf Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2018c. Strategic Intermodal System Long Range Cost Feasible Plan, FY 2029-2045. Accessed August 2020. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default- source/planning/systems/programs/mspi/pdf/sis_2029- 2045_cfp_yoe5149f504fbfb4849baa013d316f2da51.pdf?sfvrsn=b9b 2bd1c_2. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2019a. Complete Streets Implementation. https://www.fdot.gov/roadway/csi/default.shtm. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2019b. Florida Traffic Online. Accessed August 2020. https://tdaappsprod.dot.state.fl.us/fto/. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2019c. MPO Program Management Handbook. Revised July. Accessed August 2020. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default- source/content/planning/policy/metrosupport/resources/fdot- mpo-handbook.pdf?sfvrsn=c4c6799f_0. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2019d. The Florida Connected Vehicle Initiative. Accessed August 2020. https://www.fdot.gov/traffic/its/projects-deploy/cv/connected- vehicles. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2020a. Resilience Quick Guide: Incorporating Resilience in the MPO Long Range Transportation Plan. January. Accessed August 2020. http://floridatransportationplan.com/pdf/2020-01- 29_FDOT%20Resilience%20Quick%20Start%20Guide_FINAL.pdf. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2020b. FDOT District One Freight Mobility & Trade Plan 2016. July. Accessed August 2020. http://heartlandregionaltpo.org/download/plans/ FDOTD1FMTP.pdf. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2020c. FDOT Context Classification Guide. July. Accessed August 2020. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default- source/roadway/completestreets/files/fdot-context- classification.pdf?sfvrsn=12be90da_2. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2020d. First Five Year Plan Multi-Modal FY 2020/2021 through FY 2024/2025. July. Accessed August 2020. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default- source/planning/sis/1st_5_2020.pdf?sfvrsn=c6c3e627_2 Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2020e. Second Five Year Plan Multi-Modal FY 2025/2026 through FY 2029/2030. July. Accessed August 2020. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default- source/planning/sis/2nd_5_2020.pdf?sfvrsn=f3231864_2. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2020f. Five Year Work Program 2021 – 2025 (Adopted July 1, 2020). Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2020g. FDOT Traffic Online (2019). Accessed October. https://tdaappsprod.dot.state.fl.us/fto Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2020h. White Paper -- Implementation of CAV into the D1RPM in Development of 2045 LRTP Updates. September 17. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 951 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 8-4 Chapter 8 References Florida Office of Economic & Demographic Research (EDR). 2020. Population and Demographic Data – Florida Products. Accessed August 2020. http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/population- demographics/data/index-floridaproducts.cfm. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Jacobs). 2019a. Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan: Goals, Objectives and Decision- Making Framework. Prepared for Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. October 11. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp-content/uploads/Goals-Objectives- Decision-Making-Framework-10-11-19.pdf. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Jacobs). 2019b. Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan: Public Involvement Plan. Prepared for Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. October 11. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp- content/uploads/LRTP-Public-Involvement-Plan.pdf. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Jacobs). n.d.. Golden Gate City Walkable Community Study. Prepared for Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp-content/uploads/GoldenGate- Walk-Comm-Study-Adopted.pdf. Naples Airport Authority. 2020. About Naples Airport. Accessed August 2020. https://flynaples.com/about/. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office for Coastal Management. 2020a. Sea Level Rise Viewer. Accessed August 2020. https://coast.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/tools/slr.html National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) RESTORE Science Program. 2020b. A Web-Based Interactive Decision-Support Tool for Adaptation of Coastal Urban and Natural Ecosystems (ACUNE) in Southwest Florida. Accessed August 2020. https://restoreactscienceprogram.noaa.gov/projects/local-coastal- tool. Renaissance Planning. 2015. Technical Memorandum: Freight Congestion Considerations for the Collier 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Prepared for the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. November. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/3- Freight-Considerations-Tech-Memo.pdf. RWA, Inc. 2011. Immokalee Walkable Community Study. Prepared for the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. December. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp- content/uploads/2018/11/Immokalee-Walkable-Community- Study.pdf. RWA, Inc. 2012. Collier MPO 2012 Comprehensive Pathways Plan. Prepared for Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. December. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp- content/uploads/2012-CPP-Comp-No-Append.pdf. Spikowski Planning Associates. 2020. Collier 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan 2015 and 2045 Socio-economic Data. February 3. Tindale Oliver. 2015. Collier MPO 2040 Long Range Transit Element. Prepared for Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. Final. November. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp- content/uploads/2018/11/Collier-2040-LRTE-Final-Report.pdf. Tindale Oliver. 2020a. Transportation System Performance Report & Action Plan, Baseline Condition Report. Prepared for Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. Draft. June. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp-content/uploads/Baseline- Conditions-Report-V5-Combined-1.pdf. Tindale Oliver. 2020b. Transportation System Performance Report & Action Plan, Action Plan. Prepared for Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. Draft. July. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp- content/uploads/Action-Plan_V3-with-Appendices.pdf. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 952 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 8-5 Chapter 8 References Tindale Oliver. 2020c. Ten-Year Transit Development Plan. Prepared for Collier Area Transit and Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. Draft. August. Accessed August 2020. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Draft- CAT-TDP-2021-2030-Rev-08.25.2020.pdf. Tindale Oliver. 2020d. Collier MPO Local Road Safety Plan Statistical Analysis Technical Memorandum. Prepared for Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. Draft/Final. September 15. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2020. Collier County Coastal Storm Risk Management Feasibility Study. Jacksonville District Website. Accessed October 2020. https://www.saj.usace.army.mil/ CollierCountyCSRMFeasibilityStudy U.S. Census Bureau. 2019. 2011-2015 5-Year ACS Commuting Flows. Updated October. Accessed August 2020. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2015/demo/metro- micro/commuting-flows-2015.html. U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). 2018. Preparing for the Future of Transportation: Automated Vehicles 3.0. Accessed August 2020. https://www.transportation.gov/av/3. University of South Florida Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR). 2019. Autonomous Vehicle (AV) and Alternative Fuel Vehicle (AFV) Florida Market Penetration Rate and VMT Assessment Study. Prepared for Florida Department of Transportation. Final. October. Accessed August 2020. http://floridatransportationplan.com/pdf/BDV25-977- 48_Task_9_Final_Report_12_16_19.pdf. 10.A.1 Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: 10/16/20 Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation DECEMBER 2020 COLLIER MPO LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN APPENDICES Draft 11- 02 -20 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan i Appendices Contents • Appendix A Federal and State LRTP Requirements • Appendix B Collier County Traffic Analysis Zones • Appendix C 2045 Map Series • Appendix D Collier MPO FY 2021–FY 2025 TIP Summary • Appendix E Roadway Needs Evaluation Matrix • Appendix F Draft Collier 2020 System Performance Report 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Appendix A Federal and State LRTP Requirements 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-1 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-1. Federal Requirements from January 2018 FHWA Expectations Letter Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Stakeholder Coordination and Input Specific Public Involvement Strategies: Develop a written plan to document the procedures, strategies, and outcomes of stakeholder involvement in the planning process for all MPO products and processes, including but not limited to, public/stakeholder input on the LRTP and its amendments. - Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Section 2-4 - Public Information Summary Report (prepared under separate cover) - Public Involvement Plan (prepared under separate cover) - Social Media Outreach Strategy Public Involvement/Tribal/Resource Agency Consultation: Consultation on the MPO’s planning products (including the LRTP) with the appropriate Indian Tribal governments and Federal land management agencies (when the planning area includes such lands) is required to be documented. State and local agencies (including Tribal government resource agencies) responsible for land use management are required to be consulted during the development of the LRTP. The consultation process is required to be documented. - Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Section 2-4 - Public Information Summary Report (prepared under separate cover) Measures of Effectiveness: MPOs are required to periodically review the effectiveness of the procedures and strategies described within the public participation plan (PPP). The PPP is also required to contain the specific measures used, the timing of, and the process used to evaluate the MPO’s outreach and PPP strategies. Ideally, once the LRTP is developed, the outreach is evaluated, and then any needed changes to the outreach process are incorporated and documented in the PPP prior to the next LRTP update. The Collier MPO Public Participation Plan includes process for evaluating public participation effectiveness. Fiscal Constraint Project Phases: Projects in LRTPs are required to be described in enough detail to develop cost estimates in the LRTP financial plan that show how the projects will be implemented. For a project in the cost feasible plan, the phase(s) being funded and the cost must be documented. Additionally, the source of funding for each phase must be documented in the first 10 years of the LRTP. The phases to be shown in LRTPs include Preliminary Engineering (PE), Right of Way (ROW) and Construction. PE includes both the Project Development and Environment (PD&E) and Design phases. - Chapter 5 – Financial Resources - Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Table 6-2 Full Time Span of LRTP (1st 5 Years): Plans are required to have at least a 20-year horizon. As such, the MPO is required to have an LRTP that includes projects from the date of adoption projected out at least 20 years from that date. Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Table 6-2 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-2 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-1. Federal Requirements from January 2018 FHWA Expectations Letter Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Technical Topics SHSP Consistency: The goals, objectives, performance measures and targets of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), which includes the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), is required to be integrated into the LRTPs either directly or by reference. Chapter 3 – 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Freight: Changes to the planning requirements now also encourage the consultation of agencies and officials planning for freight movements. With the National Highway Freight Program a core funding category of federal funds, having a solid basis for incorporating freight needs and projecting the freight demands will be key to the LRTP’s success for meeting its regional vision for the goods movement throughout the area. Additionally, the planning regulations now require the goals, objectives performance measures and targets of the State Freight Plan to be integrated into the LRTPs either directly or by reference. - Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4- 2 - Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-4 - Chapter 7 – Implementation, Section 7-2 Environmental Mitigation/Consultation: For highway projects, the LRTP must include a discussion on the types of potential environmental mitigation activities and potential areas to carry out these activities. The environmental mitigation discussion in the LRTP must be developed in consultation with Federal, State and Tribal wildlife, land management and regulatory agencies. Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4-2 Congestion Management Process: The MPO must demonstrate that the congestion management process is incorporated into the planning process. The process the MPO uses can be documented separately or in conjunction with the LRTP. The process is required to: 1) provide for the safe and effective integrated management and operations of the transportation network; 2) identify the acceptable level of performance; 3) identify methods to monitor and evaluate performance; 4) define objectives; 5) establish a coordinated data collection program; 6) identify and evaluate strategy benefits; 7) identity an implementation schedule; and 8) periodically assess the effectiveness of the strategies. The congestion management process should result in multimodal system measures and strategies that are reflected in the LRTP and TIP. The new planning requirements provide for the optional development of a Congestion Management Plan (CMP) that includes projects and strategies that will be considered in the TIP. The Congestion Management Process was incorporated into the LRTP by reference. Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-1 (Funding of Other Roadway Needs) includes projects identified as a result of the CMP. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-3 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-1. Federal Requirements from January 2018 FHWA Expectations Letter Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plans: Government agencies with 50 or more employees that have control over pedestrian rights of way (PROW) must have transition plans for ADA. MPOs that are a part of a public agency that has these responsibilities need to have a heightened awareness for these responsibilities and plans. MPOs that are a part of a public agency that has these responsibilities need to have a heightened awareness for these responsibilities and plans. All MPOs should at a minimum, serve as a resource for information and technical assistance in local government compliance with ADA. It is the policy of the MPO to comply with all federal and state authorities requiring nondiscrimination, including but not limited to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Executive Order 12898 (Environmental Justice) and 13166 (Limited English Proficiency). The MPO does not and will not exclude from participation in; deny the benefits of; or subject anyone to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability or income. In addition, the MPO complies with the Florida Civil Rights Act, and does not permit discrimination on the basis of religion or family status in its programs, services or activities. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-4 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-1. Federal Requirements from January 2018 FHWA Expectations Letter Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Administrative Topics LRTP Documentation/Final Board Approval: The date the MPO Board adopts the LRTP is the effective date of the plan. The contents of the product that the MPO adopts on that date includes at a minimum: 1) the current and projected demand of persons and goods; 2) existing and proposed facilities that serve transportation functions; 3) a description of performance measures and targets; 4) a system performance report; 5) operational and management strategies; 6) consideration of the results of the congestion management process; 7) assessment of capital investment and other strategies to preserve existing and future infrastructure; 8) transportation and transit enhancement activities; 9) description of proposed improvements in sufficient detail to develop cost estimates; 10) discussion of potential environmental mitigation strategies and areas to carry out the activities; 11) a cost feasible financial plan that demonstrates how the proposed projects can be implemented and includes system level operation and maintenance revenues and costs; and 12) pedestrian walkway and bicycle transportation facilities which are required to be considered, where appropriate, in conjunction with all new construction and reconstruction of transportation facilities, except where bicycle and pedestrian use are not permitted. The final document(s) should be posted online and available through the MPO office no later than 90 days after adoption date. 1. Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Section 2-3 2. Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Table 4-1 and Figure 4-3 3. Chapter 3 – 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives, Table 3-1 and Chapter 7– Implementation, Table 7-1 4. Chapter 7 – Implementation, Section 7- 1 and Appendix F 5. Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-1, Funding of Other Roadway Needs 6. Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-1, Funding of Other Roadway Needs, Tables 6-4, 6-5, and 6-6 7. Chapter 5 – Financial Resources 8. Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-3 9. Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Table 4-6 and Table 4-12 10. Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4-2 11. Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan 12. Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-2 LRTP & STIP/TIP Consistency: The STIP and TIPs must be consistent with the relevant LRTPs as they are developed. When STIP/TIP amendments are received by FHWA and FTA, they will be reviewed for consistency with the applicable LRTP. Projects with inconsistencies between the STIP/TIP and the respective LRTP will not be approved for use of federal funds or federal action until the issue is addressed. The 2045 LRTP is consistent with the STIP and Collier MPO FY2021-2025 TIP (adopted June 2020), the current TIP at the time of adoption. New Requirements New Planning Factors: The MPO is required to address several planning factors as a part of its planning processes. There are two new planning factors that need to be considered in the next LRTPs: 1) improving the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reducing or mitigating stormwater impacts of surface transportation; and 2) enhancing travel and tourism. Florida has a strong history of proactively addressing these transportation areas. Chapter 3 – 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 960 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-5 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-1. Federal Requirements from January 2018 FHWA Expectations Letter Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Transportation Performance Management: As funding for transportation capacity projects becomes more limited, increasing emphasis will be placed on maximizing the efficiency and effectiveness of our current transportation system and the resources that build and maintain the system. As such, a performance-based approach to transportation decision making will be required for the FDOT and MPOs. The next LRTPs (when updated or amended after May 27, 2018) will be required to describe the performance measures and the targets the MPO has selected for assessing the performance of the transportation system. A system performance report will also be required to be included in the LRTPs. Depending on the timing of the LRTP, the date of the target setting, and length of the evaluation cycle, the LRTPs initially amended/updated after May 27, 2018 may not have a full cycle of specific information to include. However, the LRTPs need to include the data that is available and discuss how the MPO plans to use the full information once it does become available. Depending on the timing of the LRTP, the date of the target setting, and length of the evaluation cycle, the LRTPs initially amended/updated after May 27, 2018 may not have a full cycle of specific information to include. However, the LRTPs need to include the data that is available and discuss how the MPO plans to use the full information once it does become available. Chapter 7 – Implementation and Appendix F Multimodal Feasibility: The transportation plan shall include both long-range and short-range strategies/actions that provide for the development of an integrated multimodal transportation system (including accessible pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities) to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people and goods in addressing current and future transportation demand. Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Sections 6-2 and 6-3 Transit Asset Management: The MPO is required to set performance targets for each performance measure, per 23 CFR 450.306(d). Those performance targets must be established 180 days after the transit agency established their performance targets. Transit agencies are required to set their performance targets by January 1, 2017. If there are multiple asset classes offered in the metropolitan planning area, the MPO should set targets for each asset class. Chapter 7 – Implementation and Appendix F 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 961 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-6 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-1. Federal Requirements from January 2018 FHWA Expectations Letter Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Emerging Issues (Not Required) Mobility on Demand (MOD): Rapid advances in Mobility on Demand (MOD) technologies mean that these types of systems may be coming on line during the horizon of the next LRTPs. While these technologies when fully implemented will provide more opportunities to operate the transportation system better, the infrastructure needed to do so and the transition time for implementation is an area that the MPO can start to address in this next round of LRTP updates. Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Table 4-12 New Consultation: There are two new types of agencies that the MPO should consult with when developing the LRTPs: agencies that are responsible for tourism and those that are responsible for natural disaster risk reduction. The Collier MPO Adviser Network includes the Tourist Development Council Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District which plans for regional resilience to natural disasters. Summary of Public Involvement Strategies: The public involvement summary should be supported by more detailed information, such as the specific strategies used, feedback received and feedback responses, findings, etc. The detailed information should then be referenced and included in the form of a technical memorandum or report that can be appended to the LRTP, or included in a separate, standalone document that is also available for public review in support of the LRTP. - Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Section 2-4 - Public Information Summary Report (prepared under separate cover) Impact Analysis/Data Validation: In accordance with Title VI, MPOs need to have and document a proactive, effective public involvement process that includes outreach to low income, minorities and traditionally underserved populations, as well as all other citizens of the metropolitan area, throughout the transportation planning process. Using this process, the LRTP needs to document the overall transportation needs of the metropolitan area and be able to demonstrate how public feedback and input helped shape the resulting plan. - Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Section 2-4 - Public Information Summary Report (prepared under separate cover) FDOT Revenue Forecast: To help stakeholders understand the financial information and analysis that goes into identifying the revenues for the MPO, we recommend the MPO include FDOT’s Revenue Forecast in the appendices that support the LRTP. The FDOT Revenue Forecast is included as an attachment in the Project Cost Development Methodology Technical Memorandum (prepared under separate cover). 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 962 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-7 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-1. Federal Requirements from January 2018 FHWA Expectations Letter Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Sustainability and Livability in Context: We encourage the MPO to implement strategies that contribute to comprehensive livability programs and advance projects with multimodal connectivity. The MPOs are encouraged to identify and suggest contextual solutions for appropriate transportation corridors within their area and utilize the flexibilities provided in the federal funding programs to improve the transportation network for all users. Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4-1 Scenario Planning: The new planning requirements describe using multiple scenarios for consideration by the MPO in the development of the LRTP. If the MPO chooses to develop these scenarios, they are encouraged to consider a number of factors including potential regional investment strategies, assumed distribution of population and employment, a scenario that maintains baseline conditions for identified performance measures, a scenario that improves the baseline conditions, revenue constrained scenarios, and include estimated costs and potential revenue available to support each scenario. The Scenario Network Modeling Technical Memorandum (prepared under separate cover) details the revenue constrained scenarios. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 963 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-8 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-2. Federal Requirements from FHWA/FTA (November 2012) Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Projects in the LRTP - Recently we have been responding to several questions regarding types of projects that need to be included in the LRTP. As stated in 23 CFR 450.322(f), the LRTP is required to include the projected transportation demand in the planning area, the existing and proposed transportation facilities that function as an integrated system, operational and management strategies, consideration of the results of the Congestion Management Plan, strategies to preserve the existing and projected future transportation infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and transportation and transit enhancement activities. As noted in 23 CFR 450.104, a regionally significant project means a transportation project (other than projects that may be grouped in the TIP and/or STIP or exempt projects as defined in EPA’s transportation conformity regulation (40 CFR part 93.126, 127 and 128)) that is on a facility which serves regional transportation needs (such as access to and from the area outside the region; major activity centers in the region; major planned developments such as new retail malls, sports complexes, or employment centers; or transportation terminals) and would normally be included in the modeling of the metropolitan area’s transportation network. At a minimum, this includes all principal arterial highways and all fixed guideway transit facilities that offer a significant alternative to regional highway travel. If a project meets the definition of regionally significant, then the project must be included in the Cost Feasible LRTP regardless of the project’s activities (i.e. construction, facility widening, ITS installations, etc.). Regionally significant projects include those listed in Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Table 6-1. Additionally, projects resulting from M-CORES referenced in Chapter 7 – Implementation will have regional significance. Grouped Projects in the LRTP - Federal regulations allow a specifically defined type of project(s) to be grouped in the TIP. Similar groupings in the LRTP would be permissible. However, the ability to group project(s) depends on the regional significance of the project(s). Grouped projects in the TIP are typically ones that are not of an appropriate scale to be individually identified and can be combined with other projects which are similar in function, work type, and/or geographic area. Classifications of these grouped project types are listed under 23 CFR 771.117(c) and (d) and/or 40 CFR part 93. Examples are: activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction (such as planning and technical studies or grants for training and research programs); construction of non-regionally significant bicycle and pedestrian lanes, paths, and facilities; landscaping; installation of fencing, signs, pavement markings, small passenger shelters, traffic signals, and railroad warning devices where no substantial land acquisition or traffic disruption will occur; rest areas and truck weigh stations; ridesharing activities; and highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects. Therefore, if grouping projects in the LRTP, the groups need to be specific enough to determine consistency between the LRTP and the TIP. Group projects in the LRTP include the congestion management projects listed on Table 6-4 which will be funded with TMA Funds; and the bicycle/pedestrian projects listed on Table 6- 7 which will be funded with TMA/TA Funds. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 964 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-9 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-2. Federal Requirements from FHWA/FTA (November 2012) Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Fiscal Constraint Operations & Maintenance - LRTP cost estimates need to be provided for the Operations and Maintenance (O&M) activities for the entire timeframe of the LRTP. System level estimates for O&M costs may be shown for each of the five- year cost bands or may be provided as a total estimate for the full LRTP timeframe. System level is interpreted to mean the system within the MPO planning boundaries. Local agencies, working with the MPO, need to provide cost estimates for locally-maintained facilities covered in the Plan. FDOT, working with the MPO, needs to provide cost estimates for the state-maintained facilities covered in the Plan. System level estimates at the FDOT District level are acceptable for the state-maintained facilities. The LRTP will also need to identify the general source of funding for the O&M activities. Since O&M costs and related revenues are not available to balance the fiscal constraint of capital investment projects, a clear separation of costs for operations and maintenance activities from other grouped and/or regionally significant projects will need to be shown in order to demonstrate fiscal constraint. (23 CFR 450.322(f)(10)(i)). Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan Total Project Costs - For total project costs, all phases of a project must be described in sufficient detail to estimate and provide an estimated total project cost and explain how the project is expected to be implemented. Any project which will go beyond the horizon year of the LRTP must include an explanation of the project elements beyond the horizon year and what phases/work will be performed beyond the horizon year of the plan. The costs of work and phases beyond the horizon year of the plan must be estimated using Year of Expenditure (YOE) methodologies and the estimated completion date may be described as a band (i.e. Construction expected 2040-2050, $40M). If there is more than one phase remaining to be funded, these may be shown as a combined line item for the project (i.e. ROW/Construction expected 2040-2050, $50M). FHWA does not expect that this paragraph will apply to routine system preservation or maintenance activities. Total project costs will be shown for capacity expansion projects and for regionally significant projects. (23 CFR 450.322(f)). Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan Cost Feasible Plan - Revenues to support the costs associated with the work/phase must be demonstrated. For a project to be included in the cost feasible plan, an estimate of the cost and source of funding for each phase of the project being funded (including the Project Development and Environment (PD&E) phase) must be included. The phases to be shown in LRTPs include Preliminary Engineering, ROW and Construction (FHWA and FTA support the option of combining PD&E and Design phases into “Preliminary Engineering”). Boxed funds can be utilized as appropriate to finance projects. However, the individual projects utilizing the box need to be listed, or at a minimum, described in bulk in the LRTP (i.e. PD&E for projects in Years 2016-2020). (23 CFR 450.322(f)(10)). Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 965 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-10 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-2. Federal Requirements from FHWA/FTA (November 2012) Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP New Revenue Sources - If the LRTP assumes a new revenue source as part of the cost feasible plan, the source must be clearly explained, why it is considered to be reasonably available, when it will be available, what actions would need to be taken for the revenue to be available, and what would happen with projects if the revenue source was not available. If, for example, the most recent action of a governing body or a referendum of the public defeated a similar revenue source, then the new revenue source may not be included in the Cost Feasible LRTP unless the MPO can justify the revenue source and explain the difference between the action that failed and the action being proposed (for further details, please see FHWA Guidance Financial Planning and Fiscal Constraint for Transportation Plans and Programs issued by Gloria Shepherd, Associate Administrator for Planning, Environment and Realty on April 17, 2009). This applies to all revenue sources in the LRTP (i.e. federal, state, local, private, etc.) Chapter 5 – Financial Resources Federal Revenue Sources - Federal and state participation on projects in the Cost Feasible LRTP can be shown as a combined source for the cost feasible projects. Projects within the first ten years of the Plan must be notated or flagged to identify which projects are planned to be implemented with federal funds. Beyond the first ten year period, the specific federal funding notation is not expected. The project funding, however, must be clearly labeled as a combined Federal/State source in the Cost Feasible LRTP. (23 CFR 450.322(10)f(iii)) For FTA funded projects, MAP-21 has repealed eight programs from SAFETEA-LU and shifted many of the eligible activities to formula programs. Repealed programs (or uses consolidated in other formula programs) include Clean Fuels (5308), Fixed Guideway Modernization (5309), Bus and Bus Facilities (5309), JARC (5316), New Freedom (5317), Paul Sarbanes Transit in the Parks (5320), Alternatives Analysis (5339) and Over the Road Bus (3038). Formula programs now include Metropolitan Planning and State Planning (5305); Urbanized Area Formula (5307); Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Persons with Disability (5310); Rural Area Formula (5311) and RTAP (5311); Formula Grants for Public Transportation on Indian Reservations (5311); Research and Development, Demonstration and Deployment (5312), State of Good Repair (5337), Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Grants (5339). Eligible new uses which are notable include Safety Programs and Transit Asset Management, Operations in areas with 200,000 or more population with up to 100 buses; Transit Oriented Development Planning and Bus Rapid Transit demonstration projects; Core Capacity Improvements and several others. Discretionary awards that have been repealed under MAP-21 however, may have unspent funds awarded under SAFETEA-LU in the repealed programs that still must be shown in the LRTP, TIP and STIP to obligate the funds in FTA’s TEAM system. Hence, project categories such as Bus Livability, Clean Fuels, Alternatives Analysis, Transit in the Parks, etc.) may still need to be described and/or pursued by the transit grantee within the LRTP for FFY 2011 and FFY 2012 funds remaining. However, MAP-21 greatly reduced the number and type of discretionary awards through FTA. As such, the MPO and the transit grantee may no longer need to consider how to account for the possibility of placing a discretionary transit Chapter 5 – Financial Resources 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-11 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-2. Federal Requirements from FHWA/FTA (November 2012) Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP project through a competitive award (as well as formula funds) as part of the cost feasible LRTP except for New Starts, Small Starts, Core Capacity, Bus Rapid Transit Demonstration or Transit Oriented Development Demonstration Planning programs. The purpose, need and perceived benefit of the transit project as well as geographic distribution of funds may play a role in project selection. As such, a transit needs plan with projects which may be unfunded when the LRTP is prepared may need to be considered, especially for major New Start/Small Start and other capital projects like the new Core Capacity program which must eventually be placed within the cost feasible LRTP to have funds awarded. Regardless, discretionary awards if any must also be eventually listed within the cost feasible LRTP for FTA to obligate the awarded funds in a grant to a transit grantee. Full Timespan of the LRTP - The LRTP is a document that has a planning horizon of at least 20 years. The LRTP is based upon the region’s visioning of the future within the bounds of the financial resources that are available to the region during that timeframe. The LRTP is not a programming document, but rather a planning document that describes how the implementation of projects will help achieve the vision. Therefore, the MPOs will need to show all the projects and project funding for the entire time period covered by the LRTP, from the base year to the horizon year. (23 CFR 450.322(a)) Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan Environmental Mitigation - For highway projects, the LRTP must include a discussion on the types of potential environmental mitigation activities and opportunities which are developed in consultation with Federal, State and Tribal wildlife, land management and regulatory agencies. This discussion should occur at more of a system-wide level to identify areas where mitigation may be undertaken (perhaps illustrated on a map) and what kinds of mitigation strategies, policies and/or programs may be used. This discussion in the LRTP would identify broader environmental mitigation needs and opportunities that individual transportation projects might later take advantage of. MPOs should be aware that the use of ETDM alone is not environmental mitigation. That effort would be considered project screening and is not a system-wide review. Documentation of the consultation with the relevant agencies should be maintained by the MPO.(23 CFR 450.322(f)(7) and (g)) For transit capital projects, the environmental class of action is usually considered by FTA regional offices in concert with transit grantees as the projects are analyzed and developed. Transit maintenance and transfer facilities and major capacity projects like light, heavy or commuter rail, BRT, etc. may require a separate National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document while acquisition of vehicles, provision of repairs, planning studies, engineering, etc., would not require a document. As such, environmental mitigation issues would tend to be developed as part of the NEPA document for specific projects with a NEPA decision made prior to the award of FTA funds. Likewise, transit environmental benefits like Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4-2 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-12 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-2. Federal Requirements from FHWA/FTA (November 2012) Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP reduction in SOV trips and VMT, reduction in greenhouse gases, pedestrian and bicycle linkages, transit oriented/compact development (which is more walkable) may need to be stated within the broad parameters in the LRTP. Most FTA planning studies are required to be listed in the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) and not necessarily the TIP and STIP (although many MPO’s still list the studies in the TIP and STIP). Preliminary engineering, final design, right of way, utility relocation, construction, etc. for transit capital projects would need to be listed in the LRTP, TIP and STIP. Linking Planning and NEPA - Since 2008, prior to FHWA approving an environmental document (Type-2 Categorical Exclusion, Finding of No Significant Impact, or Record of Decision) and thereby granting location design concept approval, the project must be determined to be consistent within the LRTP, the TIP and Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The project consistency refers to the description (for example project name, termini and work activity) between the LRTP, the TIP and the STIP (23 CFR 450.216(k), 450.324(g) and 450.216(b)). The NEPA document must also describe how the project is going to be implemented and funded. The project implementation description in the NEPA document needs to be consistent with the implementation schedule in the LRTP and TIP/STIP as well. Future projects (design and PD&E) listed with FDOT District One in Collier County are included in either the Cost Feasible Plan (Chapter 6) or the Collier MPO FY2021 – 2025 TIP. LRTP Documentation/Final Board Approval - FHWA and FTA expect that at the time the MPO board adopts the LRTP, a substantial amount of LRTP analysis and documentation will have been completed, and all final documentation will be available for distribution no later than 90 days after the plan’s adoption. The Board and its advisory committees, as well as the public should have periodically reviewed and commented on products from interim tasks and reports that culminate into the final Plan. Finalizing the LRTP and its supporting documentation should be the last activity in a lengthy process. All final documents should be posted online and available through the MPO office no later than 90 days after adoption. The MPOs’ schedules for this round of LRTP development are expected to allow for the Board to adopt the final LRTP no later than 5 years from the MPOs’ adoption of the previous LRTP. The MPO is committed to make the LRTP documentation available for distribution within 90 days of the adoption of the 2045 LRTP. Documented LRTP Modification Procedures - If not already in place, MPOs need established written and Board approved procedures that document how modifications to the LRTP are addressed after Board adoption. The procedures should specifically explain what qualifies as a modification as opposed to an amendment as defined in 23 CFR 450.104. These procedures can be included as part of the LRTP, the PPP, or provided elsewhere as appropriate. FHWA is currently beginning work with FDOT and the MPOs on an LRTP amendment process which will include statewide procedures and thresholds, similar to the STIP amendment process. This effort will assist the MPOs in determining when LRTP amendments are required. LRTP amendment procedures are addressed in the FDOT MPO Program Management Handbook and in the Collier MPO’s adopted PPP (adopted June 2020). 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 968 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-13 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-2. Federal Requirements from FHWA/FTA (November 2012) Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP LRTP & STIP/TIP Amendment Consistency - The STIP and TIPs must be consistent with the relevant LRTPs. When amendments to the STIP/TIP are made, the projects must also be consistent with the LRTP from which they are derived. FHWA and FTA staff will be checking for this consistency. Projects with inconsistencies between the STIP/TIP and the respective LRTP will not be approved for use of federal funds or federal action until the issue is addressed. (23 CFR 450.328 and 23 CFR 450.216(b)) FHWA and FTA understand that when developing project cost estimates in an LRTP, the cost is an estimate which becomes more refined as a project advances. Projects being refined between plans will not be required to update their costs in the existing LRTP if new, more accurate information regarding project cost becomes available. However, it is expected that upon the next scheduled adoption of the LRTP, the latest project cost estimates shall be used. The 2045 LRTP is consistent with the STIP and Collier MPO FY2021- 2025 TIP (adopted June 2020), the current TIP at the time of adoption. Transit Projects and Studies Major Transit Capital Projects - For LRTP development purposes, federal funding sources for major transit capital projects must be proposed and may not currently be identifiable (or currently allocated) for use in the urbanized area. The Federal Transit Administration funds projects such as New Start rail and BRT, as well as major capital facilities such as administrative buildings or maintenance facilities with formula and/or discretionary program dollars allocated on an annual basis. As mentioned, MAP-21 made changes to and reductions in transit discretionary programs. Therefore in order to plan for a transit “New Start” in the LRTP, the MPO must assume they will be successful in competing for discretionary FTA New Starts program dollars. A reasonable funding mix might be to assume 50% FTA/25% Local/25% State funding, as is currently the norm in Florida. Also, MAP- 21 greatly expands the use of TIFIA loans. Grantees may be proposing use of a TIFIA loan or other loan to help bridge the gap in capital financing for a New Start which in some cases for large projects in multiple phases may take up to five years to design and build (per phase). With regard to the planning of a major capital transit facility other than a New Start, the assumption must be made that FTA program funds such as “State of Good Repair” or “Bus and Bus Facilities” will be awarded to the transit system based on formula. As mentioned, large discretionary awards will be fewer under MAP-21. In most cases, a likely funding mix for State of Good Repair or Bus and Bus Facilities might be 80% FTA/20% local, or up to 100% FTA matched with toll revenue credits. Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-3 Transit Facility - The transit grantee may propose a specific transit maintenance facility, transfer facility, multi-modal station, park n ride lot with transit service or other transit facility for rehabilitation, renovation or new construction. Generally, such facility improvements remain eligible for FTA 5307, 5309, 5337 (new State of Good Repair formula program), 5339 (new bus and bus facility formula program) funds from FTA, or for FLEX funds from FHWA flexed to FTA for the transit use by Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-3 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 969 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-14 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-2. Federal Requirements from FHWA/FTA (November 2012) Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP the transit grantee. At a minimum, such facilities should be contained within the TIP, STIP and be “consistent with” the LRTP. For example, consistent with the LRTP might mean a general statement, paragraph, line item or section on the specific facilities and their general location if known. Inclusion might also mention feasibility studies, preliminary engineering, appraisals, final design, property acquisition and relocation (if any) and NEPA documents and perhaps the intent to seek local, state or federal funding for same. The award of such funds may require an LRTP amendment to show such funds in the constrained LRTP. Transit Service including Fixed Route Bus, Deviated Route, Para-transit, Enhanced or Express Bus - The transit grantee may propose a specific new transit service for a new area or corridor. Generally, such new service is eligible for 5307 or 5310 funds from FTA, or for L230 FLEX funds from FHWA to the transit grantee. At a minimum, such new service should be “consistent with” the LRTP. For example, consistent with the LRTP might mean a general statement, paragraph, line item or section on the specific service improvements to be undertaken (and the general location if known). Inclusion might also mention feasibility studies, operational plans, strategic plans and perhaps the intent to seek local, state or federal funding for same. The award of such funds may require an LRTP amendment to show such funds. Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-3 Transit Service Including Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Light Rail Transit (LRT) Heavy Rail Transit (HRT), Commuter Rail Transit (CRT), Streetcar through the New Starts/Small Starts Program - The transit grantee may propose a specific new fixed guideway transit service (like BRT, LRT, HRT, CRT or Streetcar) to serve a new area or corridor as part of FTA’s New Starts/Small Starts or Core Capacity Program. Generally, such new service is eligible for 5307 or 5309 funds from FTA, or for FLEX funds from FHWA to the transit grantee. At a minimum, such new service should be “consistent with” the LRTP. As such service may be a large capital expenditure, the project, termini and cost would need to be specified in the constrained LRTP. Inclusion might also mention feasibility studies, NEPA studies, preliminary engineering and final design, right of way acquisition, operational plans, modeling improvements, strategic plans and perhaps the intent to seek local, state or federal funding for same. The award of such funds would require an LRTP amendment to show such funds in the constrained LRTP. There are no specific new fixed guideway transit service projects identified in the CFP. Emerging Issues (Not Required) Safety and Transit Asset Management - MAP-21 also includes significant additions to safety planning and transit asset management on the part of transit grantees and the states. Federal Register guidance is expected on transit safety and transit asset management within the near future. Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Tables 6-5 and 6-6 Performance Measurement - FHWA and FTA encourage the MPOs to consider ways to incorporate performance measures/metrics for system-wide operation, as well as more localized measures/metrics into their LRTPs. As funding for Chapter 7 – Implementation and Appendix F 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-15 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-2. Federal Requirements from FHWA/FTA (November 2012) Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP transportation capacity projects becomes more limited, increasing emphasis will be placed on maximizing the efficiency and effectiveness of our current transportation system. Consequently, measures to assess the LRTP’s effectiveness in increasing system performance will be needed. Per the recent passage of MAP- 21, USDOT will establish performance measures in consultation with State DOTs, MPOs and other stakeholders within 18 months of MAP-21’s enactment. Once performance measures are identified, the States will have up to one year to set state level targets. Once state level targets have been set, MPOs will have up to six-month to set local level targets that support the state targets. The process and schedule for performance measure implementation and LRTP documentation is expected to evolve over the next two years. Freight - The planning process is required to address the eight planning factors as described in 23 CFR 450.306(a). The degree to which each factor is addressed will vary depending upon the unique conditions of the MPO areas, but efforts should be made to think through and carefully consider how to address each factor. The importance of freight to the nation’s economic wellbeing and global competitiveness, as well as its support and promotion of job creation and retention has heightened its status at the national and regional level. MPOs should be aware that discussions in MAP-21 have largely included a reference to the increasing importance of freight, including the development of Statewide Freight Plans. While this is part of one of the eight planning factors, special emphasis should be given to the freight factor, as it is anticipated to play a more prominent role in future planning requirements. Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4-2 Sustainable Transportation and Context Sensitive Solutions - The MPOs are encouraged to identify and suggest contextual solutions for appropriate transportation corridors. For example, Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) may be appropriate for historic parkways, historic districts, town centers, dense “walkable” neighborhood areas, arterial “gateways”, greenway trails and pedestrian ways, environmentally sensitive areas or simply where right of way is not readily available. Under MAP-21, Transportation Alternatives like bicycle and pedestrian improvements and trails remain eligible under the formula programs while transportation enhancement set-asides have been removed and some uses like historic building renovation and scenic easements may be more restrictive. The value of the resources present may suggest the need for alternative or special treatments (or even accepting a level of congestion and lower speeds that respects the resources). In these instances, specific livability principles adopted by the MPO might be employed for improved pedestrian and transit access – especially to schools and even traffic calming. Also, spatial relationships that support public transit like transit oriented development and the “trip not taken” while reducing greenhouse gases might be recognized as characteristics of a town center or mixed use area with public transit access. Other livability planning goals might also need to be recognized like preserving affordable housing, improving/preserving special resources like parks, monuments and tourism areas, increasing floor area ratios and reducing parking Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4-1 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 971 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-16 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-2. Federal Requirements from FHWA/FTA (November 2012) Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP minimums in select corridors to encourage walking trips and public transit, transportation demand management, etc. Proactive Improvements (Not Required) Linking Planning and NEPA - For highway projects, we are continually looking for strategies that improve the linkage between planning and environmental processes. For the inclusion of regionally significant projects in the Cost Feasible Plan of the LRTP, MPOs should strongly consider including a purpose and need statement for the project in the LRTP. This purpose and need statement will be carried into the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process and will be one way to enhance the linkage between planning and NEPA. For example, this purpose and need statement could briefly provide the rationale as to why the project warranted inclusion in the LRTP. (450.324 (d); 450 Appendix A to Part 450, Section II Substantive Issues, 8) Future projects (design and PD&E) listed with FDOT District One in Collier County are included in either the Cost Feasible Plan (Chapter 6) or the Collier MPO FY2021 – 2025 TIP. Climate Change - MPOs may also wish to give consideration to climate change and strategies which minimize impacts from the transportation system. FHWA supports and recognizes the importance of exploring the effects of climate change on transportation, as well as the limited environmental resources and fuel alternatives. State legislation now encourages each MPO to consider strategies that integrate transportation and land use planning in their LRTP to provide for sustainable development and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as well as include energy considerations in all state, regional and local planning. As a result, MPO LRTP Updates are encouraged to include discussions and strategies aimed at addressing this issue. Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4-2, Climate Change Vulnerability and Risks Scenario Planning - Pursuant to MAP-21, MPOs may elect to develop multiple scenarios for consideration in the development of the LRTP. If the MPO chooses to develop these scenarios, it is encouraged to consider a number of factors including potential regional investment strategies, assumed distribution of population and employment, a scenario that maintains baseline conditions for identified performance measures, revenue constrained scenarios, and estimated costs and potential revenue available to support each scenario. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Scenario Network Modeling Technical Memorandum (prepared under separate cover) explains the revenue constrained scenarios 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 972 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-17 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-3. Federal Requirements from FHWA/FTA (December 2008) Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Plan Horizon - Plans are required to have at least a 20 year horizon. FHWA and FTA support Florida’s efforts to standardize the horizon year and establish a uniform format to report the transportation needs of each MPO in their next LRTP updates that can also be used to compile and identify the regional and statewide transportation needs of Florida’s metropolitan areas. FDOT and Florida’s MPOs (via the MPOAC) have agreed to use 2035 as the horizon year. The base year for the next LRTP updates will be 2009. These efforts to standardize the MPOs’ plans will provide consistency among plans and allow for better analysis and apples to apples comparisons, so unmet needs can be more accurately quantified and demonstrated. More information on this issue is provided in the “Financial Guidelines for MPO Long Range Plans” paper adopted by the MPOAC. Plan is through 2045, reference Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan and Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan Planning Factors - The planning process is required to address the eight planning factors as described in 23 CFR 450.306(a). The degree to which each factor is addressed will vary depending on the unique conditions of the area, but efforts should be made to think through and carefully consider how to address each factor. The Safety factor seems to create challenges for some MPOs as to how safety should be addressed. The LRTP should contain a safety element, as described in 23 CFR 450.322 (h). The planning process needs to be consistent with the State Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). Consequently, the MPO must be familiar with the Plan in order to identify MPO goals and strategies that would address safety, and integrate SHSP goals and strategies into the activities and planning efforts of the MPO. Suggestions for how this consistency can be accomplished can be obtained through discussions with, and examples provided by, FHWA, FDOT and other MPOs. A safety guide providing a menu of recommendations for MPO actions is being developed by FHWA Florida Division as a result of meetings with FDOT planning and safety personnel and MPO staff members from throughout the state over the past year. A draft document will be circulated for review by December 2008. Chapter 3 – 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Year of Expenditure - All LRTP Update financial plans shall be in Year of Expenditure (YOE) dollars and shall include estimates of all revenue sources that can reasonably be anticipated over the lifetime of the plan. Revenue and cost estimates for capacity and non-capacity projects and programs, including operations and maintenance costs (state and local) are to be included, consistent with the methodology presented in the financial guidance developed by FDOT in coordination with FHWA and the MPOs. The financial guidance should be included in the appendices of the LRTP. Note: The December 2007 interim YOE Compliance Process guidance previously developed by FDOT/FHWA/FTA to address LRTP amendments and modifications prior to LRTP Updates being completed is no longer applicable once the MPOs have adopted their LRTP Updates. Chapter 5 – Financial Resources 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 973 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-18 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-3. Federal Requirements from FHWA/FTA (December 2008) Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Fiscal Constraint - Projects in Long Range Transportation Plans (LRTPs) are required to be described in enough detail to develop cost estimates in the LRTP financial plan that show how the projects will be implemented. These estimates could reflect known costs of mitigation. The LRTP documentation of project costs will enable FHWA/FTA and FDOT to determine fiscal constraint of the document. For a project to be included in the cost feasible plan, the cost of and source of funding for each phase being funded (including the PD&E phase) must be documented. The source of funds for the PD&E phase can be shown as “boxed funds” reserved for “PD&E” in a state or local revenue forecast (e.g., a percentage of state/federal “Product Support” funds estimated to be available during a 5-year planning period) or be individually assigned to each project. Boxed funds should also be reserved for the Final Design phase as well or be individually assigned to each project. A third option is to use boxed funds entitled “PD&E and Final Design”. Regardless of how the boxed funds are titled, the individual projects utilizing the box need to be listed, or at a minimum, described in bulk in the LRTP (i.e. PD&E for projects in Years 2016-2020). Please note that the FHWA guidance refers to Preliminary Engineering (PE). In most states this would include two of Florida phases: PD&E and Final Design. PD&E could also be referred to as “PE for NEPA”. Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan NEPA Approvals - Prior to FHWA approving an environmental document (Type-2 CE, EA-FONSI, or FEIS) and thereby granting location design concept approval, the project must be consistent with the LRTP and described in the STIP/TIP. The NEPA document must describe how the project is going to be implemented and funded. That description also needs to be reflected in the LRTP and STIP/TIP. For guidance related to NEPA approvals, see the “Guidance on Consistency Among Metropolitan Long Range Transportation Plans, the State Transportation Improvement Program, Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Programs and NEPA Approvals”. Future projects (design and PD&E) listed with FDOT District One in Collier County are included in either the Cost Feasible Plan (Chapter 6) or the Collier MPO FY2021 – 2025 TIP. Environmental Mitigation - The LRTP must include a discussion on environmental mitigation that is developed in consultation with Federal, State and Tribal wildlife, land management and regulatory agencies. This discussion should occur at more of a system-wide level to identify areas where mitigation may be undertaken (perhaps illustrated on a map) and what kinds of mitigation strategies, policies and/or programs may be used. This discussion in the LRTP would identify broader environmental mitigation needs and opportunities that individual transportation projects might later take advantage of. For example, as a result of consultation with resource agencies, the plan might identify an expanse of degraded wetlands associated with a troubled body of water that represents a good candidate for establishing a wetlands bank or habitat bank for wildlife and waterfowl. The plan might identify locations where the purchase of Development rights would assist in preserving a historic battlefield or historic farmstead. Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4-2 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 974 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-19 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-3. Federal Requirements from FHWA/FTA (December 2008) Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Congestion Management Process - Since the passage of SAFETEA-LU in 2005, the emphasis on congestion management has been on the process, and how that process results in strategies that can be reflected in the LRTP and TIP. The CMP shall be developed, established and implemented as part of the metropolitan transportation planning process and should be integrated into project prioritization and performance evaluation of the multi-modal transportation system. - Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4-2 - Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-1 Chapter 7 – Implementation, Section 7-2 Environmental/Tribal Consultation - Consultation involving the appropriate Tribal governments, federal and state wildlife, land management and regulatory agencies should be documented in the public participation plan. This consultation shall involve comparisons of state conservation plans/maps, and inventories of natural or historical resources with transportation plans, as appropriate and available. Tribal governments and resource agencies should also be involved in the actual development of the Plan, as well as in the discussions of how their plans may affect the proposed transportation plan. The process for how tribal governments and resource agencies are involved in the planning process needs to be developed in collaboration with those agencies. Public Participation processes should also include the Tribal governments, federal and state wildlife, land management and regulatory agencies and should be documented, along with public participation activities and efforts with the other transportation partners and interested parties as required, in the public participation plan. - Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Section 2-4 - Public Information Summary Report (prepared under separate cover) LRTP Impact Analysis - In accordance with Title VI, MPOs need to have and document a proactive, effective public involvement process that includes outreach to low income, minorities and traditionally underserved populations, as well as all other citizens of the metropolitan area, throughout the transportation planning process. Using this process, the LRTP needs to document the overall transportation needs of the metropolitan area and be able to demonstrate how public feedback and input helped shape the resulting plan. MPOs may use a variety of strategies to demonstrate that their planning process is consistent with Title VI and other federal anti-discrimination provisions in the development of the LRTP. MPOs need to include this information in summary form in the LRTP. This information should be derived from the MPO’s public involvement program elements. The summary of public involvement should be supported by more detailed information, such as the specific strategies used, feedback received and feedback responses, findings, etc. The detailed information should then be referenced and included in the form of a technical memorandum or report that can be appended to the LRTP, or included in a separate, stand-alone document that is also available for public review in support of the LRTP. - Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Section 2-4 Public Information Summary Report (prepared under separate cover) 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 975 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-20 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-3. Federal Requirements from FHWA/FTA (December 2008) Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Emerging Issues (Not Required) Indirect and Cumulative Impacts - A discussion of indirect and cumulative effects and an evaluation of the level of effect would be appropriate at the overall plan level, rather than just at the project level. This information could be expanded upon during the project development project phase, but the initial groundwork could be laid during LRTP development. Multimodal Feasibility - The analysis for utilizing other modes, particularly evaluating transit on a plan and system wide level, as opposed to project level, could and should be explored to provide more efficient and effective mobility and connectivity of the entire multimodal transportation system. This process is especially relevant given the current situation with limited resources for transportation being a major issue. Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Sections 6-2 and 6-3 Performance Measurement - As funding for transportation capacity projects becomes more limited, increasing emphasis will be placed on maximizing the efficiency and effectiveness of our current transportation system. As congestion management processes and operations strategies are evaluated to determine their effectiveness in improving system performance, it is likely to follow that LRTPs will also need to be evaluated on their ability to improve system performance. As MPOs begin the LRTP update process, performance measures to assess the LRTP’s effectiveness in increasing system performance should be developed. Chapter 7 – Implementation and Appendix F Air Quality - Although Florida is currently in attainment for all pollutants, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recently proposed changes to lower the threshold for ground level ozone which will affect the attainment status of a number of MPO areas within Florida. Although the effects and the exact areas affected are not certain at this time, it is prudent to begin looking at what would be required to meet the new standards if/when they are implemented, which could be in the next few years. This is particularly important for those MPOs in areas that have been identified as potential areas that may not meet new standards. Discussions will be initiated with EPA, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), FHWA and FDOT to decide how best address this issue. Training has been requested by FHWA for FDOT and the MPOs on Air Quality and Conformity for the coming year. The Collier MPO geographic area is a designated attainment area for all of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards under the criteria provided in the Clean Air Act. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 976 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-21 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-3. Federal Requirements from FHWA/FTA (December 2008) Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Climate Change - Much attention has been given by all levels of government to the issue of climate change and how it affects all aspects of life, including the transportation system. Legislation was recently passed in Florida that encourages each MPO to consider strategies that integrate transportation and land use planning in their LRTP to provide for sustainable development and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as well as include energy considerations in all state, regional and local planning. As a result, it is anticipated that the MPO LRTP Updates will include discussions and strategies aimed addressing this issue. FHWA also supports and recognizes the importance of exploring the effects of climate change on transportation, as well as the limited environmental resources and fuel alternatives. FHWA’s recently released report, “Integrating Climate Change Considerations into the Transportation Planning Process” (www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep/index.htm) serves as a good resource on this topic. Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4-2, Climate Change Vulnerability and Risks 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 977 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-22 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-4. Other Federal Law and Requirements the LRTP Shall Include Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP The current and projected transportation demand of persons and goods in the metropolitan planning area over the period of the transportation plan. [23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(1)] Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Section 2-3 Emphasis should be given to those existing or proposed transportation facilities that serve important national and regional transportation functions over the period of the transportation plan, including major roadways, public transportation facilities, intercity bus facilities, multimodal and intermodal facilities, non- motorized transportation facilities, and intermodal connectors. Additionally, the locally preferred alternative selected from an Alternative Analysis under the FTA Capital Investment Grant Program needs to be adopted as a part of the plan. [23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(2)] Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan A description of the performance measures and performance targets used in assessing the performance of the transportation system in accordance with the required performance management approach. [23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(3)] Chapter 7 – Implementation, Section 7-1 A system performance report and subsequent updates evaluating the condition and performance of the transportation system with respect to the required performance targets, including progress achieved by the MPO in meeting the performance targets in comparison with system performance recorded in previous reports, including baseline data; and, for MPOs that voluntarily elect to develop multiple scenarios, an analysis of how the preferred scenario has improved the conditions and performance of the transportation system, and how changes in local policies and investments have impacted the costs necessary to achieve the identified performance targets. [23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(4)] Chapter 7 – Implementation and Appendix F Operational and management strategies to improve the performance of existing transportation facilities in order to relieve vehicular congestion and maximize the safety and mobility of people and goods. [23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(5) Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-1 Consideration of the results of the congestion management process in Transportation Management Areas (TMA), including the identification of single occupancy vehicle (SOV) projects that result from a congestion management process in TMAs that are nonattainment for ozone or carbon monoxide. [23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(6)] Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-1 Assessment of capital investment and other strategies to preserve the existing and projected future metropolitan transportation infrastructure, provide for multimodal capacity increases based on regional priorities and needs, and reduce the vulnerability of the existing transportation infrastructure to natural disasters. May consider projects and strategies that address corridors or areas where congestion threatens the efficient functioning of the MPO’s transportation system. [23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(7)] Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 978 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-23 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-4. Other Federal Law and Requirements the LRTP Shall Include Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Include transportation and transit enhancement activities, including consideration of the role that intercity buses may play in reducing congestion, pollution, and energy consumption in a cost-effective manner and strategies and investments that preserve and enhance intercity bus systems. Activities would also include systems that are privately owned and operated. [23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(8)] Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-3 Descriptions of proposed improvements in sufficient detail to develop cost estimates (e.g., design concept and design scope descriptions). [23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(9)] Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Table 4-6 and Table 4-12 A discussion of types of potential environmental mitigation activities and potential areas to carry out these activities, including activities that may have the greatest potential to restore and maintain the environmental functions affected by the LRTP. The discussion may focus on policies, programs, or strategies, rather than at the project level. The MPO shall develop the discussion in consultation with applicable Federal, State, and Tribal land management, wildlife, and regulatory agencies. The MPO may establish reasonable timeframes for performing this consultation. [23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(10)] Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4-2 A financial plan that demonstrates how the adopted transportation plan can be implemented. Revenue and cost estimates must use an inflation rate(s) to reflect “year of expenditure dollars,” based on reasonable financial principles and information, developed cooperatively by the MPO, State(s), and public transportation operator(s). For illustrative purposes, the financial plan may include additional projects that would be included in the adopted transportation plan if additional resources beyond those identified in the financial plan were to become available. [23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(11)] Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan Pedestrian walkway and bicycle transportation facilities in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 217(g). [23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(12)] Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-2 The plan shall include both long and short-range strategies/actions that provide for the development of an integrated multimodal transportation system (including accessible pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities) to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people and goods in addressing current and future transportation demand. [23 C.F.R. 450.324(b)] Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan The MPO, the State(s), and the public transportation operator(s) shall validate data used in preparing other existing modal plans for providing input to the transportation plan. In updating the transportation plan, the MPO shall base the update on the latest available estimates and assumptions for population, land use, travel, employment, congestion, and economic activity. The MPO shall approve transportation plan contents and supporting analyses produced by a transportation plan update. [23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)] Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Section 2-3 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 979 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-24 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-4. Other Federal Law and Requirements the LRTP Shall Include Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP The MPO shall integrate priorities, goals, countermeasures, strategies, or projects for the metropolitan planning area contained in the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), including the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), or an Interim Agency Safety Plan, as in effect until completion of the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan; and may incorporate or reference applicable emergency relief and disaster preparedness plans and strategies and policies that support homeland security, as appropriate, to safeguard the personal security of all motorized and non-motorized users. [23 C.F.R. 450.324(h)] Chapter 3 – 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Source: FDOT – MPO Handbook, Chapter 4: https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default- source/planning/policy/metrosupport/resources/fdot-mpo- handbook99c4d55af487435394909e5f80818235.pdf?sfvrsn=861c81ff_27 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 980 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-25 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-5. Other State Requirements for the LRTP Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP LRTPs are to identify transportation facilities that should function as an integrated metropolitan transportation system, giving emphasis to facilities that serve important national, state, and regional transportation functions, including facilities on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) and facilities for which projects have been identified pursuant to Transportation Regional Incentive Program. [Section 339.175(1), F.S.] Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-1 The LRTP must address at least a 20-year planning horizon, include both long- range and short-range strategies, and comply with all other State and Federal requirements. The LRTP must also consider these prevailing principles: preserving the existing transportation infrastructure, enhancing Florida’s economic competitiveness, and improving travel choices to ensure mobility. [Section 339.175(7), F.S.] Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan The LRTP must be consistent, to the maximum extent feasible, with future land use elements and the goals, objectives, and policies of the approved local government comprehensive plans of the units of local government located within the jurisdiction of the MPO. [ Section 339.175(7), F.S.] Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4-1 Each MPO is encouraged to consider strategies that integrate transportation and land use planning in order to provide for sustainable development and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. [Section 339.175(7), F.S Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Section 2-2 The approved LRTP must be considered by local governments in the development of the transportation elements in local government comprehensive plans and any amendments thereto. [Section 339.175(7), F.S.] The 2045 LRTP will be provided to all local governments for development of their comprehensive plans. The LRTP must identify transportation facilities, including, but not limited to, major roadways, airports, seaports, spaceports, commuter rail systems, transit systems, and intermodal or multimodal terminals that will function as an integrated metropolitan transportation system. [Section 339.175(7)(a), F.S.] - Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan - Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan - Chapter 7 - Implementation The LRTP must give emphasis to those transportation facilities that serve national, statewide, or regional functions; and must consider the goals and objectives identified in the Florida Transportation Plan. If a project is located within the boundaries of more than one MPO, the MPOs must coordinate plans regarding the project in their LRTPs. [Section 339.175(7)(a), F.S.] Table 6-1 in Chapter 6 presents projects that are considered regionally or nationally significant. The Florida Transportation Plan is listed as a referenced document for the LRTP update, in Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 981 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier MPO 2045 Long Range A-26 Appendix A Federal and Transportation Plan State LRTP Requirements Table A-5. Other State Requirements for the LRTP Regulatory Requirement Summary Where Requirements Are Addressed in the LRTP Plan, Section 4-1. The goals and objectives in the FTP were considered and are similar to the goals and objectives identified for the 2045 LRTP update. Coordination with Lee County MPO took place several times throughout the LRTP update. The LRTP must assess capital investment and other measures necessary to ensure the preservation of the existing metropolitan transportation system, including requirements for the operation, resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation of major roadways and requirements for the operation, maintenance, modernization, and rehabilitation of public transportation facilities. [Section 339.175(7)(c)(1), F.S.] Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan The LRTP must assess capital investment and other measures necessary to make the most efficient use of existing transportation facilities to relieve vehicular congestion, improve safety, and maximize the mobility of people and goods. Such efforts must include, but are not limited to, consideration of infrastructure and technological improvements necessary to accommodate advances in vehicle technology, such as autonomous technology and other developments. [Section 339.175(7)(c)(2), F.S.] Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan The LRTP must indicate, as appropriate, proposed transportation enhancement activities, including, but not limited to, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, scenic easements, landscaping, historic preservation, mitigation of water pollution due to highway runoff, and control of outdoor advertising. [Section 339.175(7)(d), F.S.] At this time, the 2045 LRTP does not specifically address proposed transportation enhancement activities with the exception of pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The LRTP must be approved by each MPO on a recorded roll-call vote or hand- counted vote of the majority of the MPO membership present. [Section 339.175(13), F.S.] The Collier MPO is committed to the adoption of the LRTP during a recorded roll call vote or hand-counted vote of the majority of the MPO Board members. Source: FDOT – MPO Handbook, Chapter 4: https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default- source/planning/policy/metrosupport/resources/fdot-mpo- handbook99c4d55af487435394909e5f80818235.pdf?sfvrsn=861c81ff_27 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 982 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation LRTP Review Checklist 1 Updated- 9/17/2019 FDOT LRTP Review Checklist Collier MP0 2045 LRTP Section A- Federal Requirements Where and How Addressed 23 C.F.R. Part 450 – Planning Assistance and Standards A-1 Does the plan cover a 20-year horizon from the date of adoption? Please see the “Administrative Topics” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(a) Yes. The plan covers 2025 through 2045. A-2 Does the plan address the planning factors described in 23 C.F.R. 450.306(b)? Please see the “Fiscal Constraint” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. Please see the “New Requirements” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. Risk and Resiliency Does the plan improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation? Travel and Tourism Does that plan enhance travel and tourism? Please see the “Proactive Improvements” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(a) Yes. Reference Chapter 3 – 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives. Yes. Chapter 3 – LRTP Goals and Objectives, Table 3-1 presents how projects identified in the Needs Plan were scored based on Goal #10. Yes. Chapter 3 – LRTP Goals and Objectives, Table 3-1 presents how projects identified in the Needs Plan were scored based on Goal #3. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 983 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation LRTP Review Checklist 2 Updated- 9/17/2019 Section A- Federal Requirements Where and How Addressed A-3 Does the plan include both long-range and short-range strategies/actions that provide for the development of an integrated multimodal transportation system (including accessible pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities) to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people and goods in addressing current and future transportation demand? Please see the “Technical Topics” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(b) Yes. Reference Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan. A-4 Was the requirement to update the plan at least every five years met? Please see the “Administrative Topics” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(c) Yes. The last approved LRTP was the 2040 LRTP adopted in December 2015. A-5 Did the MPO coordinate the development of the metropolitan transportation plan with the process for developing transportation control measures (TCMs) in a State Implementation Plan (SIP)? 23 C.F.R. 450.324(d) The Collier MPO geographic area is a designated attainment area for all of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards under the criteria provided in the Clean Air Act. A-6 Was the plan updated based on the latest available estimates and assumptions for population, land use, travel, employment, congestion, and economic activity? Please see the “Proactive Improvements” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(e) Yes. Reference Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Section 2-3. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 984 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation LRTP Review Checklist 3 Updated- 9/17/2019 Section A- Federal Requirements Where and How Addressed A-7 Does the plan include the current and projected transportation demand of persons and goods in the metropolitan planning area over the period of the plan? Please see the “Technical Topics” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. Please see the “Administrative Topics” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(1) Yes. Reference Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Section 2-3. A-8 Does the plan include existing and proposed transportation facilities (including major roadways, public transportation facilities, intercity bus facilities, multimodal and intermodal facilities, nonmotorized transportation facilities, and intermodal connectors that should function as an integrated metropolitan transportation system, giving emphasis to those facilities that serve important national and regional transportation functions over the period of the transportation plan? 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(2) Yes. Reference Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan. A-9 Does the plan include a description of the performance measures and performance targets used in assessing the performance of the transportation system in accordance with §450.306(d)? Please see the “New Requirements” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(3) Yes. Reference Chapter 7 – Implementation and Appendix F (System Performance Report). 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 985 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation LRTP Review Checklist 4 Updated- 9/17/2019 Section A- Federal Requirements Where and How Addressed A-10 Does the plan include a system performance report and subsequent updates evaluating the condition and performance of the transportation system with respect to the performance targets described in §450.306(d), including progress achieved by the metropolitan planning organization in meeting the performance targets in comparison with system performance recorded in previous reports, including baseline data? Please see the “New Requirements” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(4)(i) Yes. Reference Chapter 7 – Implementation and Appendix F (System Performance Report). 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 986 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation LRTP Review Checklist 5 Updated- 9/17/2019 Section A- Federal Requirements Where and How Addressed A-11 Did the MPO integrate in the metropolitan transportation planning process, directly or by reference, the goals, objectives, performance measures, and targets described in other State transportation plans and transportation processes, as well as any plans developed under 49 U.S.C. chapter 53 by providers of public transportation, required as part of a performance-based program including: (i) The State asset management plan for the NHS, as defined in 23 U.S.C. 119(e) and the Transit Asset Management Plan, as discussed in 49 U.S.C. 5326; (ii) Applicable portions of the HSIP, including the SHSP, as specified in 23 U.S.C. 148; (iii) The Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan in 49 U.S.C. 5329(d); (iv) Other safety and security planning and review processes, plans, and programs, as appropriate; (v) The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program performance plan in 23 U.S.C. 149(l), as applicable; (vi) Appropriate (metropolitan) portions of the State Freight Plan (MAP-21 section 1118); (vii) The congestion management process, as defined in 23 CFR 450.322, if applicable; and (viii) Other State transportation plans and transportation processes required as part of a performance-based program. Please see the “New Requirements” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.306 (d)(4) Yes. Reference Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4-2, referenced plans. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 987 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation LRTP Review Checklist 6 Updated- 9/17/2019 Section A- Federal Requirements Where and How Addressed A-12 Does the plan include operational and management strategies to improve the performance of existing transportation facilities to relieve vehicular congestion and maximize the safety and mobility of people and goods? Please see the “Technical Topics” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(5) Yes. Reference the following: -Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4-2 -Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-1 -Chapter 7 – Implementation, Section 7-2 A-13 Does the plan include consideration of the results of the congestion management process in TMAs, including the identification of SOV projects that result from a congestion management process in TMAs that are nonattainment for ozone or carbon monoxide? Please see the “Technical Topics” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(6) Yes. Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-1. No single occupancy vehicle projects were identified as the Collier MPO geographic area is a designated attainment area for all of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards under the criteria provided in the Clean Air Act. A-14 Does the plan include assessment of capital investment and other strategies to preserve the existing and projected future metropolitan transportation infrastructure, provide for multimodal capacity increases based on regional priorities and needs, and reduce the vulnerability of the existing transportation infrastructure to natural disasters? 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(7) Yes. Reference Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan and Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan (Ranking the Needs). A-15 Does the plan include transportation and transit enhancement activities, including consideration of the role that intercity buses may play in reducing congestion, pollution, and energy consumption in a cost-effective manner and strategies and investments that preserve and enhance intercity bus systems, including systems that are privately owned and operated, and including transportation alternatives, as defined in 23 U.S.C. 101(a), and associated transit improvements, as described in 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)? 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(8) Yes. Reference Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-3. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 988 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation LRTP Review Checklist 7 Updated- 9/17/2019 Section A- Federal Requirements Where and How Addressed A-16 Does the plan describe all proposed improvements in sufficient detail to develop cost estimates? Please see the “Fiscal Constraint” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(9) Yes. Reference Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Table 4- 6 and Table 4-12. A-17 Does the plan include a discussion of types of potential environmental mitigation activities and potential areas to carry out these activities, including activities that may have the greatest potential to restore and maintain the environmental functions affected by the metropolitan transportation plan? Please see the “Technical Topics” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(10) Yes. Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan, Section 4-2 A-18 Does the plan include a financial plan that demonstrates how the adopted transportation plan can be implemented? Please see the “Fiscal Constraint” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(11) Yes. Reference Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan. A-19 Does the plan include system-level estimates of costs and revenue sources to adequately operate and maintain Federal-aid highways and public transportation? 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(11)(i) Yes. Reference Chapter 5 – Financial Resources and Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan. A-20 Did the MPO, public transportation operator(s), and State cooperatively develop estimates of funds that will be available to support metropolitan transportation plan implementation, as required under §450.314(a)? Please see the “Proactive Improvements” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(11)(ii) Yes. Reference Chapter 5 – Financial Resources. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 989 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation LRTP Review Checklist 8 Updated- 9/17/2019 Section A- Federal Requirements Where and How Addressed A-21 Does the financial plan include recommendations on additional financing strategies to fund projects and programs included in the plan, and, in the case of new funding sources, identify strategies for ensuring their availability? 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(11)(iii) Yes. Reference Chapter 5 – Financial Resources A-22 Does the plan's revenue and cost estimates use inflation rates that reflect year of expenditure dollars, based on reasonable financial principles and information, developed cooperatively by the MPO, State(s), and public transportation operator(s)? 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(11)(iv) Yes. Reference Chapter 5 – Financial Resources and Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan. A-23 Does the financial plan address the specific financial strategies required to ensure the implementation of TCMs in the applicable SIP? 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(11)(vi) The Collier MPO geographic area is a designated attainment area for all of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards under the criteria provided in the Clean Air Act. Therefore no specific financial strategies were required to ensure implementation of TCMs. A-24 Does the plan include pedestrian walkway and bicycle transportation facilities in accordance with 23 U.S.C.17(g)? 23 C.F.R. 450.324(f)(12) Yes. Reference Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan, Section 6-2. A-25 Does the plan integrate the priorities, goals, countermeasures, strategies, or projects for the metropolitan planning area contained in the HSIP, including the SHSP, the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan, or an Interim Agency Safety Plan? Please see the “Technical Topics” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(h) Yes. Reference Chapter 3 – 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives. A-26 Does the plan identify the current and projected transportation demand of persons and goods in the metropolitan planning area over the period of the plan? 23 C.F.R. 450.324(g)(1) Yes. Reference Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Section 2‐3.  10.A.2 Packet Pg. 990 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation LRTP Review Checklist 9 Updated- 9/17/2019 Section A- Federal Requirements Where and How Addressed A-27 Did the MPO provide individuals, affected public agencies, representatives of public transportation employees, public ports, freight shippers, providers of freight transportation services, private providers of transportation (including intercity bus operators, employer-based commuting programs, such as carpool program, vanpool program, transit benefit program, parking cashout program, shuttle program, or telework program), representatives of users of public transportation, representatives of users of pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities, representatives of the disabled, and other interested parties with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the transportation plan using the participation plan developed under §450.316(a)? 23 C.F.R. 450.324(j) Yes. Through coordination with the Collier MPO’s committees, plan updates provided to the Collier MPO Advisor Network, and public outreach documented in Chapter 2 and the Public Involvement Summary Report (prepared under separate cover), the MPO provided individuals, affected public agencies, and all other agencies noted (with the exception of public ports), reasonable opportunity to comment on the 2045 LRTP. A-28 Did the MPO publish or otherwise make readily available the metropolitan transportation plan for public review, including (to the maximum extent practicable) in electronically accessible formats and means, such as the World Wide Web? Please see the “Stakeholder and Coordination Input” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. Please see the “Administrative Topics” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.324(k), 23 C.F.R. 450.316(a)(1)(iv) Yes. The MPO posted the Draft LRTP and the Final LRTP on their website for public comments. A-29 Did the MPO provide adequate public notice of public participation activities and time for public review and comment at key decision points, including a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed metropolitan transportation plan? Please see the “Stakeholder and Coordination Input” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R 450.316(a)(1)(i) Yes. Reference the Public Involvement Summary Report (prepared under separate cover). 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 991 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation LRTP Review Checklist 10 Updated- 9/17/2019 Section A- Federal Requirements Where and How Addressed A-30 In developing the plan, did the MPO seek out and consider the needs of those traditionally underserved by existing transportation systems such as low-income and minority households? Please see the “Stakeholder and Coordination Input” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. Please see the “Proactive Improvements” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R 450.316(a)(1)(vii) Yes. Reference the Public Involvement Summary Report (prepared under separate cover). A-31 Has the MPO demonstrated explicit consideration of and response to public input received during development of the plan? If significant written and oral comments were received on the draft plan, is a summary, analysis, and report on the disposition of the comments part of the final plan? Please see the “Stakeholder and Coordination Input” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.316(a)(1)(vi) & 23 C.F.R. 450.316(a)(2) Yes. Reference the Public Involvement Summary Report (prepared under separate cover), where a summary of comments is presented. No significant comments were received on the draft plan. A-32 Did the MPO provide an additional opportunity for public comment if the final plan differs significantly from the version that was made available for public comment and raises new material issues which interested parties could not reasonably have foreseen from the public involvement efforts? Please see the “Stakeholder and Coordination Input” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R 450.316(a)(1)(viii) The final plan and draft plan were not significantly different. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 992 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation LRTP Review Checklist 11 Updated- 9/17/2019 Section A- Federal Requirements Where and How Addressed A-33 Did the MPO consult with agencies and officials responsible for other planning activities within the MPO planning area that are affected by transportation, or coordinate its planning process (to the maximum extent practicable) with such planning activities? Please see the “Proactive Improvements” section of the 2018 FHWA LRTP Expectations Letter for guidance. 23 C.F.R. 450.316(b) Yes. Reference Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Table 2-2. A-34 If the MPO planning area includes Indian Tribal lands, did the MPO appropriately involve the Indian Tribal government(s) in the development of the plan? 23 C.F.R 450.316(c) Yes. Reference Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Table 2-2. A-35 If the MPO planning area includes Federal public lands, did the MPO appropriately involve Federal land management agencies in the development of the plan? 23 C.F.R 450.316(d) Yes. The MPO Advisor Network includes the National Park Service (Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve), US Fish and Wildlife Service (Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge and Ten Thousand Islands National Wildlife Refuge). The MPO also coordinates with State and non-profit land management agencies. A-36 In urbanized areas that are served by more than one MPO, is there written agreement among the MPOs, the State, and public transportation operator(s) describing how the metropolitan transportation planning processes will be coordinated to assure the development of consistent plans across the planning area boundaries, particularly in cases in which a proposed transportation investment extends across those boundaries? 23 C.F.R. 450.314(e) Yes. Reference the Interlocal Agreement for Joint Regional Transportation Planning and Coordination Between the Collier and Lee County MPOs. https://www.colliermpo.org/wp- content/uploads/2018/11/Interlocal-Agreement-for- Joint-Regional-Transportation-Planning-and- Coordination-Between-the-Collier-and-Lee-County- MPOs-1.pdf 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 993 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation LRTP Review Checklist 12 Updated- 9/17/2019 Section B- State Requirements Where and How Addressed Florida Statutes: Title XXVI – Public Transportation, Chapter 339, Section 175 B-1 Are the prevailing principles in s. 334.046(1), F.S. – preserving the existing transportation infrastructure, enhancing Florida’s economic competitiveness, and improving travel choices to ensure mobility – reflected in the plan? ss.339.175(1), (5) and (7), F.S. Yes. Reference Chapter 3 – Goals and Objectives. B-2 Does the plan give emphasis to facilities that serve important national, state, and regional transportation functions, including SIS and TRIP facilities? ss.339.175(1) and (7)(a), F.S. Yes. Reference Chapter 2 – Plan Process and Chapter 3 – Goals and Objectives. The Collier 2045 LRTP is consistent with the local government comprehensive plans. B-3 Is the plan consistent, to the maximum extent feasible, with future land use elements and the goals, objectives, and policies of the approved comprehensive plans for local governments in the MPO’s metropolitan planning area? ss.339.175(5) and (7), F.S. Yes. Reference the plan list in Chapter 4. B-4 Did the MPO consider strategies that integrate transportation and land use planning to provide for sustainable development and reduce greenhouse gas emissions? ss.339.175(1) and (7) F.S. Yes. Reference Chapter 3 - Goals and Objectives. B-5 Were the goals and objectives identified in the Florida Transportation Plan considered? s.339.175(7)(a), F.S. Yes. Reference plans listed in Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan and the goals and objectives identified in Chapter 3 – Goals and Objectives. B-6 Does the plan assess capital investment and other measures necessary to 1) ensure the preservation of the existing metropolitan transportation system, including requirements for the operation, resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation of major roadways and requirements for the operation, maintenance, modernization, and rehabilitation of public transportation facilities; and 2) make the most efficient use of existing transportation facilities to relieve vehicular congestion and maximize the mobility of people and goods? s.339.175(7)(c), F.S. Yes. Reference Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 994 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation LRTP Review Checklist 13 Updated- 9/17/2019 Section B- State Requirements Where and How Addressed B-7 Does the plan indicate, as appropriate, proposed transportation enhancement activities, including, but not limited to, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, scenic easements, landscaping, historic preservation, mitigation of water pollution due to highway runoff, and control of outdoor advertising? s.339.175(7)(d), F.S. At this time, the 2045 LRTP does not specifically address proposed transportation enhancement activities with the exception of pedestrian and bicycle facilities. B-8 Was the plan approved on a recorded roll call vote or hand-counted vote of the majority of the membership present? s.339.175(13) F.S. Yes. The MPO is committed to the adoption of the LRTP during a recorded roll call vote or hand- counted vote of the majority of the MPO Board members. Section C- Proactive Recommendations Where and How Addressed C-1 Does the plan attempt to improve the resilience and reliability of the transportation system or mitigate the impacts of stormwater on surface transportation? 23 C.F.R 450.306(b)(9) Yes. Reference Chapter 3 – Goals and Objectives and Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan. C-2 Does the plan proactively identify climate adaptation strategies including—but not limited to—assessing specific areas of vulnerability, identifying strategies to reduce emissions by promoting alternative modes of transportation, or devising specific climate adaptation policies to reduce vulnerability? Yes. Reference the ranking of the needs in Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan. C-3 Do the plan consider the transportation system’s accessibility, mobility, and availability to better serve an aging population? Yes. Reference the ranking of the needs in Chapter 4 – 2045 Needs Plan. C-4 Does the plan consider strategies to promote inter- regional connectivity to accommodate both current and future mobility needs? Yes. Reference Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan. C-5 Is the MPO considering the short- and long-term effects of population growth and or shifts on the transportation network? Yes. Reference Chapter 2 – Plan Process, Section 2-3, Forecasting Growth. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 995 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Appendix B Collier County Traffic Analysis Zones 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 996 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) 252125952522217428292571294426182573224726422287232622352517248828752876228625102874287128732640260926062485286926032638232522362898223028562596260726142654263929452852264328252226232125162225294424692636246022022868287729372239239224172644246126472862261925722598240928282872286023902612239124112580282728632265251528512248293428552474289725972613265626112881273828262734261026082615261623932733273728662655239529382443289129392735250928322730288724972574286727292936244428932211239826202599240323342481223226172502286428792322276722122854234529112479241227392488241025012499273126312943225826052413289424002728275126412935287828832736248029312882241623572892239425752748223828532359286524182353274723622408274422642289283528392742283323582840275328452889288425772604232823152743257926292749275825762600258528802356249625832590258624052584274524012503284423392361293223892344272723602370284129122421275424322371247727592415240724982885284828702305248922722299226024842425242428182291236622312861249322532346283828902592259325072488242828232293252526242457284322542765247129042330252426342307234324402369232022972449282022902475290624342512285822552311232324022176222928882300223725192494251429142314225725022683252323122500265222852491247229292467222722002196293027902506Gulf ofMexicoPicayune Strand State ForestTen Thousand IslandsNational Wildlife Refuge±0 2.5 5 MilesLEEHENDRYMONROEEverglades CityMarcoIslandBROWARDMIAMI-DADEEvergladesNational ParkFakahatcheeStrand PreserveState ParkCorkscrewRegional EcosystemWatershedCorkscrewSwampSanctuaryBig CypressNational PreserveFlorida PantherNational WildlifeRefugeCollier-SeminoleState ParkLakeTraffordTraffic Analysis ZonesJ^26432647291126382629263429042906262729092211291224902630263526262633265226242653291026492942262824612650290728642913262126452908292026222625265126232903290229192646290029402915292129162648291829012899J^223224692328229923452471233023312297230123292298232322292300232423462683229624622459270727062327221924702349246723502200220727122196222426822220245124892702278626842217219921982438246322092437278122042779270124452663229528022800267228092464230728082216266524652206231927112705281027002787281428032294279327952785223724732227244722152660244622282218222324722681223422412246220522332214217827082458229326772680246628122671233223522240267826792664245722442717266728112686267626852221228823022669222226662213220327922448220127912210224327882813219521972192219321772687265926742179218426962349220826572245234723072675266122422711SEEINSET8468468588588469495129890846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSET890SEE INSET10.A.2Packet Pg. 997Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Appendix C 2045 Map Series 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 998 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE±0 2.5 5 MilesBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACHEEEEEEEEEEES 1st STWestclox STGopher Ridge RDW Main STAirpor t RD N 1st ST EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELivingston RDAirport RD NTamiami TRL NT am iam i T R L EDavis BLVDImmokalee RDPine Ridge RDVanderbilt Beach RDGolden Gate PKWYVanderbilt DROld 41Rattlesnake Hammock RDPiper BLVDEVehicular FatalityEPedestrian FatalityEBicyclist FatalityMapping Analysis of Crash Data from 2014 to 2018EvergladesCityMarcoIslandNaplesNaplesCrash DensityLowMediumHigh8468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSET890Data Source:FDOT Florida Traffic Safety Portal10.A.2Packet Pg. 999Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) ±0 2.5 5 MilesBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACHS 1st STWestclox STGopher Ridge RDW Main STAirpor t RD N 1st ST Livingston RDAirport RD NTamiami TRL NT am iam i T R L EDavis BLVDImmokalee RDPine Ridge RDVanderbilt Beach RDGolden Gate PKWYVanderbilt DROld 41Rattlesnake Hammock RDPiper BLVDPotential Low-Level Flooding with 1-ft Sea Level RisePotential Flooding with 1-ft Sea Level RiseEvergladesCityMarcoIslandNaplesNaplesMap of 1-ft Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding8468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSET890**Sea levels at the highest tide*Sea Level Rise Data Source:NOAA SLR Viewer v3.0.0,August 2020Note:NOAA SLR Viewer Tool estimates a 1.35-ft Sea Level Rise by2040 and 1.90-ft by 2050, using the Intermediate-HighScenario10.A.2Packet Pg. 1000Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Map of Environmental Justice Areas±0 2.5 5 MilesLEEHENDRYMONROEEvergladesCityMarco IslandBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACHEJ RankMediumHighVery High8468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSET890Environmental Justice Areas Source:Collier MPO Bike & Ped Master Plan, March 2019Lake Trafford10.A.2Packet Pg. 1001Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) ±0 2.5 5 MilesBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACHS 1st STWestclox STGopher Ridge RDW Main STAirpor t RD N 1st ST Livingston RDAirport RD NTamiami TRL NT am iam i T R L EDavis BLVDImmokalee RDPine Ridge RDVanderbilt Beach RDGolden Gate PKWYVanderbilt DROld 41Rattlesnake Hammock RDPiper BLVDBicycle Facility GapsNo Existing Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Paved ShoulderExisting Connector SidewalkPublic Comment OverlapOn-Road Bicycle FacilityPathwaySafety ConcernMarco Island Master PlanSidewalkMap of Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Gaps Overlapped with Public CommentEvergladesCityMarcoIslandNaplesNaples8468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSET890Data Source:Collier MPO Bike & Pedestrian Master Plan, 201910.A.2Packet Pg. 1002Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) ±0 2.5 5 MilesBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACHS 1st STWestclox STGopher Ridge RDW Main STAirpor t RD N 1st ST Livingston RDAirport RD NTamiami TRL NT am iam i T R L EDavis BLVDImmokalee RDPine Ridge RDVanderbilt Beach RDGolden Gate PKWYVanderbilt DROld 41Rattlesnake Hammock RDPiper BLVDShared Use PathBicycle FacilityConnector SidewalkPaved ShoulderGreenwayProposed GreenwayProposed Shared Use PathProposed Bike LaneMap of SunTrail Alignments and Spine Pathway CorridorsEvergladesCityMarcoIslandNaplesNaplesSEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEE2984684685885884685089084694Data Source:Collier MPO Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan, 201910.A.2Packet Pg. 1003Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) ±0 2.5 5 MilesBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACHS 1st STWestclox STGopher Ridge RDW Main STAirpor t RD N 1st ST Livingston RDAirport RD NTamiami TRL NT am iam i T R L EDavis BLVDImmokalee RDPine Ridge RDVanderbilt Beach RDGolden Gate PKWYVanderbilt DROld 41Rattlesnake Hammock RDPiper BLVDExisting FacilitiesBike LaneConnector SidewalkDesignated Bike LaneGreenwayLow Speed/Low VolumePaved ShoulderSUPSharrowProposed FacilitiesCS/Safety Study CorridorGreenways with SUPsProposed Enhanced Facility; ProposedEnhanced Facility - LRTP Capacity Prj;Proposed Enhanced Facility - from GapsBicycle and Pedestrian FacilitiesEvergladesCityMarcoIslandNaplesNaplesSEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEE2984684685885884684689084694Congestion Hot Spot Data Source:Collier MPO Transportation System Performance Report & Action PlanBaseline Conditions Report 2020Existing Plus Proposed Facilities10.A.2Packet Pg. 1004Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Appendix D Collier MPO FY 2021–FY 2025 TIP Summary 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1005 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) in $ YOE FPN Roadway From To Description Agency ENV PD&E PE ROW CST ENV PD&E PE ROW CST ENV PD&E PE ROW CST ENV PD&E PE ROW CST ENV PD&E PE ROW CST Total Project Costs Highway Projects - Roadway 4175402 SR 29 Oil Well Rd Sunniland Nursery Rd Add lanes and Reconstruct FDOT $885,000 $7,440,000 8,325,000 4175403 SR 29 Sunniland Nursery Rd S of Argicultural Way Widen 2-4 lanes FDOT 500,000 500,000 4175404 SR 29 S of Agricultural Way CR 846 E Add lanes and Reconstruct FDOT 270,000 270,000 4175405 SR 29 CR 846 E N of New Markey Rd New Road CST FDOT $975,253 $60,000 $5,708,149 6,743,402 4175406 SR 29 N of New Market Rd SR 82 Add lanes and Reconstruct FDOT 380,000 $1,091,754 1,471,754 4178784 SR 29 SR 82 Hendry C/L Add lanes and Reconstruct FDOT 15,000 1,298,542 50,000 1,363,542 4258432 I-75 SR 951 Ultimate Interchange Impro FDOT 6,900,638 50,000 870,392 $100,000 $45,150 $96,221,815 104,187,995 4308481 SR 82 Hendry C/L Gator Slough Ln Add lanes and Reconstruct FDOT 2,118,990 20,000 50,000 $41,143,813 $1,400,000 44,732,803 4351112 SR 951 Manatee Rd N of Tower Rd Add lanes and Reconstruct FDOT 1,956,693 $15,385,189 17,341,882 4404411 Airport Pulling Rd Vanderbilt Bch RD Immokalee Rd Add Thru Lanes Collier 3,000,000 $9,856,200 12,856,200 4452962 I-75 Pine Ridge Rd Interchnage Imporvement FDOT $5,450,000 5,450,000 4463231 Corkscrew Rd N Wildcat Dr E of Wildcat Dr Widen/Resurface Collier 1,478,586 1,478,586 4463232 Corkscrew Rd S Lee County Curve Collier County Curve Widen/Resurface Collier $1,321,000 1,321,000 4463381 Vanderbilt Beach Rd US 41 E of Goodlette-Frank RAdd lanes and Reconstruct Collier $8,428,876 8,428,876 4463411 Goodlette Frank Rd Vanderbilt Bch RD Immokalee Rd Add lanes and Reconstruct Collier $5,500,000 5,500,000 4464121 CR 951 (Collier Blvd)Golden Gate Canal Green Blvd Widen/Resurface Collier $3,200,000 3,200,000 Bridge Projects 4318953 16th St Bridge NE Golden Gate Blvd Randall Blvd New Bridge Cst Collier 4,933,943 4,933,943 CMS/ITS Projects 4463171 Harbour Dr at Crayton Rd Roundabout Naples $892,211 892,211 4463172 Mooring Line Dr Crayton Rd Roundabout Naples $126,000 126,000 4464511 US 41 Golden Gate Parkway Intersection FDOT / NHS 270,000 $225,942 495,942 CIP Projects 60168 Vanderbilt Beach Rd Collier Blvd 16th St N/A Collier 75,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 105,000,000 60201 Pine Ridge Rd Livingston Blvd I-75 N/A Collier 0 60147 Randall Blvd at Immokalee Rd Intersection Improvements Collier 8,800,000 8,800,000 60190 Airport Pulling Rd Vanderbilt Beach Rd Immokalee Rd N/A Collier $14,500,000 14,500,000 60211 Orange Blossom Airport Pulling Rd Livingston N/A Collier 200,000 200,000 60198 Veterans Memorial N/A Collier 1,800,000 1,800,000 8,800,000 12,400,000 60199 Vanderbilt Beach Rd US 41 E of Goodlette N/A Collier 250,000 250,000 8,900,000 9,400,000 60129 Benfield Ext Lords Way City Gate N N/A Collier 1,000,000 7,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 $1,000,000 11,000,000 60144 Oil Well Rd Everglades Oil Well Grade N/A Collier 908,000 300,000 300,000 $300,000 1,808,000 68057 Collier Blvd Green Blvd Golden Gate Main Can N/A Collier 3,200,000 7,000,000 $4,900,000 15,100,000 60065 Randall Blvd Immokalee Rd Oil Weell rd N/A Collier $1,500,000 1,500,000 TBD Immokalee Rd at Northbrook Dr/Tarpon Bay Dr N/A Collier 1,000,000 1,000,000 TBD Goodlette Frank Rd Vanderbilt Bch Rd Immokalee Rd N/A Collier 2,000,000 5,500,000 $6,750,000 14,250,000 TBD Green Blvd Santa Barbara Blvd Sunshine N/A Collier 500,000 500,000 60229 Wilson Blvd Golden Gate Blvd Immokalee Rd N/A Collier 2,000,000 10,000,000 $10,000,000 22,000,000 TBD Vanderbilt Beach Rd 16th St Everglades N/A Collier 2,000,000 11,250,000 $5,000,000 18,250,000 TBD Immokalee Rd Livingston Blvd Logan Blvd N/A Collier 1,000,000 1,000,000 236,708,000 FY 2020/2021 FY 2021/2022 FY 2022/2023 FY 2023/2024 FY 2024/2025 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1006 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Appendix E Roadway Needs Evaluation Matrix and Backup Maps 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1007 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) 2045  Map ID 2045  RANK 2045  Weighted  Score Project From To Description Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score 1 51 126 Benfield Road Extension The Lords Way City Gate Boulevard North New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes)0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐5                   (20)‐1                     (4)‐1                      ‐    ‐5 2 41 138 Benfield Road  US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail East)Rattlesnake‐Hammock Ext New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes)0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐5                   (20)‐1                     (4)‐1                      ‐    ‐5 372 75Big Cypress Parkway North of I‐75 Golden Gate Blvd New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes)0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐2                     (8) 0                      ‐   0                      ‐    ‐3 470 83Big Cypress Parkway Golden Gate Blvd Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext. New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes)0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐   0                      ‐    ‐2 571 81Big Cypress Parkway Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext.Oil Well  Road New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes)0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐2                     (8) 0                      ‐   0                      ‐    ‐4 682 52Big Cypress Parkway Oil Well  Road Immokalee Rd New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes)0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐4                   (16) 0                      ‐   0                      ‐    ‐3 7 62 100 Camp Keais Road Pope John Paul Blvd Oil Well Road Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes 0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐3                   (12) 0                      ‐    ‐4                      ‐    ‐2 880 74Camp Keais Road  Immokalee Road Pope John Paul Blvd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lanes  0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐2                     (8) 0                      ‐    ‐4                      ‐    ‐2 9 1 286 Collier Blvd (CR 951) Golden Gate Main Canal Green Blvd Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6  Lanes 5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 10 21 182 CR 951 Extension (new) Heritage Bay Entrance (Collier Blvd (CR  951) northern terminus)Lee/Collier County Line New 2‐Lane  Road 0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐4                   (16) 0                      ‐   0                      ‐    ‐3 11 34 152 Everglades Boulevard  Randall Blvd South of Oil Well Road Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes   5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4)‐1                     (4)‐2                      ‐   0 12 35 152 Everglades Boulevard  Vanderbilt Bch Rd Ext Randall Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes   5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐2                     (8) 0                      ‐    ‐3                      ‐   0 13 54 121 Everglades Boulevard  Golden Gate Blvd Vanderbilt Bch Rd Ext Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes   5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐    ‐2                      ‐   0 14 63 99 Everglades Boulevard  I‐75 (SR‐93)Golden Gate Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes   5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐4                   (16)‐1                     (4)‐3                      ‐    ‐4 15 37 147 Golden Gate Boulevard  Everglades Blvd Desoto Boulevard Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes   0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐    ‐1                      ‐    ‐1 16 58 105 Golden Gate Boulevard Ext Desoto Blvd Big Cypress Parkway New 4‐Lane  Road 0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐   0                      ‐    ‐4 17 31 161 Goodlette‐Frank Road  Vanderbilt Beach Road Immokalee Road   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐   0 18 66 91 Green Boulevard  Santa Barbara/ Logan Boulevard Sunshine Boulevard Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane  0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 19 27 166 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW 23rd St SW Wilson Blvd Ext  New 2‐Lane  (Future Study  Area)0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 20 33 154 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW CR 951 23rd Street SW New 4‐Lane  (Future Study  Area)0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐3                   (12)‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐   0 21 42 138 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW Wilson Blvd Ext Everglades Boulevard New 2‐Lane  Road 0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐    ‐1                      ‐    ‐2 22 60 102 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Everglades Blvd New Interchange 5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐5                   (20)‐1                     (4)‐1                      ‐   ‐1 23 8 250 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Golden Gate Parkway @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 24 2 285 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Collier Blvd (SR 951) @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 25 22 180 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Immokalee Rd @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 26 18 190 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Pine Ridge Rd @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 27 40 146 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new)(not in  SIS) Vanderbilt Beach Rd New Interchange  ‐ Partial (to /  from the North)5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 29 5 269 I‐75 (SR‐93) Managed (Toll) Lanes Collier Blvd (CR 951)Collier/Lee County Line   New 4‐Lane  Express (Toll)  Lanes 5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐2                     (8)0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 30 7 251 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) Camp Keais Rd Carver St Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4  Lanes  5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 31 23 172 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) SR 29 Airpark Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4  Lanes 0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   ‐2 32 81 72 Keane Avenue Inez Rd Wilson Blvd Ext. New 2‐Lane  Road (Future  Study Area)0                      ‐   0                      ‐    ‐2                     (8)0                      ‐    ‐3                      ‐   0 33 50 127 Little League Rd. Ext. SR‐82 Westclox St.New 2‐Lane  Road 0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4)‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐   0 34 65 92 Logan Boulevard  Green Boulevard Pine Ridge Road   Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes  0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4)‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐   0 35 52 125 Logan Boulevard  Vanderbilt Beach Road Immokalee Road   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 36 67 89 Logan Boulevard  Pine Ridge Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   ‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐    ‐3 37 38 147 Oil Well Road / CR 858 Everglades Blvd Oil Well Grade Rd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes 5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐4                   (16)‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐   ‐2 38 46 131 Oil Well Road / CR 858 Ave Maria Entrance Camp Keais Road Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 39 10 236 Old US 41 US 41 (SR 45)Lee/Collier County Line Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes 0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   ‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐   0 40 45 135 Orange Blossom Drive  Airport Pulling Road Livingston Road   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 42 39 147 Randall Boulevard 8th St NE Everglades Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐    ‐1                      ‐   ‐1 43 59 103 Randall Boulevard Everglades Blvd Desoto Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes   0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐   0                      ‐   ‐2 44 61 101 Randall Boulevard Ext. Desoto Blvd Big Cypress Parkway New 4‐Lane  Road 0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 45 44 136 Santa Barbara Boulevard  Painted Leaf Lane Green Boulevard   Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes  0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 46 56 112 SR 29 SR 82 Collier/Hendry Line Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes 5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐    ‐1                      ‐   ‐1 48 49 128 SR 29 I‐75 (SR 93)Oil Well Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes 5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4)‐1                     (4)‐1                      ‐   ‐1 50 24 172 SR 29  New Market Road North   North of SR‐82 Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane  5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐    ‐1                      ‐   ‐1 51 13 212 SR 29/New Market Road W ‐ New Road Immokalee Rd (CR 846)New Market Road North  Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane  0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐    ‐1                      ‐   ‐1 52 3 277 SR 29  Agriculture Way CR 846 E Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane  5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐    ‐1                      ‐   ‐1 53 15 197 SR 29  Sunniland Nursery Rd Agriculture Way Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane  5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐    ‐1                      ‐   ‐1 54 16 197 SR 29  Oil Well Road Sunniland Nursery Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane  5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐    ‐1                      ‐   ‐1 55 6 263 SR 84 (Davis Blvd) Airport Pulling Rd Santa Barbara Blvd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane  5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 56 9 242 Collier Blvd (SR 951) South of Manatee Rd North of Tower Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane  5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4)‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐   0 57 4 275 Critical Needs Intersection @ US 41 Goodlette Rd @ US 41 Intersection Improvement 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 58 12 219 US 41 Greenway Rd 6 L Farm Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane  5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐    ‐1                      ‐   ‐1 59 11 232 Critical Needs Intersection @ US 41 Collier Blvd (SR 951) @ US 41 Intersection Improvement 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 60 14 201 US 41 Immokalee Road Old US 41 Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane  5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   ‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐   0 62 73 75 Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext 16th St Big Cypress Parkway New 2‐Lane Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes)0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐5                   (20)0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 63 53 122 Westclox Street Extension Little League Road West of Carson Road New 2‐Lane  Road 0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4)‐1                     (4)‐1                      ‐   0 64 30 162 Wilson Blvd Golden Gate Boulevard Immokalee Rd   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes   0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐   0                      ‐   ‐1 65 32 156 Wilson Blvd Keane Ave Golden Gate Boulevard New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes)0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 66 17 195 Immokalee Rd intersection Livingston Rd Intersection Improvement 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 67 57 106 Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension Strand Blvd I‐75 New 4‐Lane  Road 0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 68 83 45 Big Cypress Parkway intersection (new) Oil Well Grade Rd New At‐Grade Intersection 0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 70 68 86 Green Boulevard Extension Everglades Blvd Big Cypress Parkway New 2‐Lane  Road 0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 73 20 190 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) intersection Collier Blvd (CR 951) Intersection Improvement 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 74 28 165 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) intersection Wilson Blvd Intersection Improvement 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 75 55 115 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new) (not in  SIS) Veterans Memorial Blvd New Partial Interchange 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 76 43 137 Vanderbilt Drive Immokalee Rd Woods Edge Parkway Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes   0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4)‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐   0 77 25 170 Pine Ridge Rd intersection Livingston Rd Intersection Improvement 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐    78 29 165 Golden Gate Parkway intersection Livingston Rd Intersection Improvement 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐    80 47 131 Vanderbilt Beach Road Goodlette‐Frank Road  Airport Pulling Road  Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes  0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 81 74 75 Bridge @ 47th Avenue NE West of Everglades Boulevard New Bridge over Canal 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 82 75 75 Bridge @ Wilson Boulevard South of 33rd Avenue NE New Bridge over Canal 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 83 69 85 Bridge @ 18th Ave NE between Wilson Boulevard N and 8th  Street NE New Bridge over Canal 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 84 76 75 Bridge @ 18th Ave NE between 8th Street NE and 16th Street  NE New Bridge over Canal 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 85 64 95 Bridge @ 13th Street NW north end at proposed Vanderbilt Beach  Road Extension New Bridge over Canal 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 86 77 75 Bridge @ 16th Street SE South end New Bridge over Canal 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 87 78 75 Bridge @ Location TBD ‐ Assume 10th  Avenue SE East of Everglades Blvd New Bridge over Canal 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 88 48 130 Bridge @Wilson Boulevard South,  south end New Bridge over Canal 0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 89 79 75 Bridge @ 62nd Avenue NE  West of 40th Street NE New Bridge over Canal 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 90 26 167 Pine Ridge Rd Logan Blvd S Collier Blvd (CR 951) Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes  5                    20 0                      ‐    ‐1                     (4)‐1                     (4) 0                      ‐   ‐5 93 32 157 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 43rd Ave NE/Shady Hollow Blvd E North of 47th Avenue NE/Immokalee Widen from 2‐Lanes to 4‐Lanes 5                    20                       ‐    ‐1                     (4)‐1                     (4)‐1                     (1)‐1 94 57 113 Immokalee Road Rural Village Blvd  (new) Immokalee Rd (CR 846)Immokalee Rd (CR 846)New 4‐Lane Road 0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐2                     (8)0                      ‐    ‐5                     (5)‐1 41A 19 190 Critical Needs Intersection @  Immokalee Rd Immokalee Road @ Randall Blvd Ultimate Intersection  Improvement: Overpass 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 41B 36 151 Randall Boulevard Immokalee Road 8th St NE Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   0                      ‐   5                    20 ‐1                     (4)0                      ‐    ‐2                      ‐   0 Note: Does not include Critical Needs Intersections [#95 through #114]; it was necessary to rank or prioritize 1A ‐ Improves Evacuation  Routes 1B ‐ Provides Enhanced or  potential new evacuation  routes 2A ‐ Amount of wetland  encroachment based on  NWI 2B ‐ Proximity to protected  natural areas (0.5 mile) 2C ‐Amount of habitat  encroachment based on  secondary panther habitat 2D ‐ Amount o encroachment primary panth Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Needs Assessment Plan Goals 1.Ensure the Security of Transportation System for Users 2. Protect Environmental Resources                          Weighting (out  of 100):4.00                                          4.00                                          4.00                                          4.00                                           ‐                                             Performance  Measures: Is the roadway a current  evacuation route? Yes = 5 No = 0   No impact = 0 0 ‐ 5 acres =  ‐1 6 ‐ 10 acres = ‐2 11 ‐ 15 =‐ ‐3 15 ‐ 20 =‐ ‐4  21 or more  =‐ ‐5 (max) Within 0.5 miles of  Conservation  Areas/Preserves lands? Yes = ‐1 No = 0 No impact = 0 0 ‐ 10 acres =  ‐1 11 ‐ 20 acres = ‐2 21 ‐ 30 =‐ ‐3 31 ‐ 40 =‐ ‐4  40 or more =‐ ‐5 (max) No impact = 0 0 ‐ 10 acres =  ‐ 11 ‐ 20 acres = 21 ‐ 30 =‐ ‐3 31 ‐ 40 =‐ ‐4  40 or more =‐ ‐ Table 1B.Draft Evaluation Matrix DRAFT ‐ July 2020; updated 9/3/2020 Evaluation  Criteria: PAGE 1 OF 5 10/22/2020 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1008 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) 2045  Map ID 2045  RANK 2045  Weighted  Score Project From To Description 1 51 126 Benfield Road Extension The Lords Way City Gate Boulevard North New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 2 41 138 Benfield Road  US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail East)Rattlesnake‐Hammock Ext New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 372 75Big Cypress Parkway North of I‐75 Golden Gate Blvd New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 470 83Big Cypress Parkway Golden Gate Blvd Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext. New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 571 81Big Cypress Parkway Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext.Oil Well  Road New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 682 52Big Cypress Parkway Oil Well  Road Immokalee Rd New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 7 62 100 Camp Keais Road Pope John Paul Blvd Oil Well Road Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes 880 74Camp Keais Road  Immokalee Road Pope John Paul Blvd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lanes   9 1 286 Collier Blvd (CR 951) Golden Gate Main Canal Green Blvd Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6  Lanes 10 21 182 CR 951 Extension (new) Heritage Bay Entrance (Collier Blvd (CR  951) northern terminus)Lee/Collier County Line New 2‐Lane  Road 11 34 152 Everglades Boulevard  Randall Blvd South of Oil Well Road Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    12 35 152 Everglades Boulevard  Vanderbilt Bch Rd Ext Randall Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    13 54 121 Everglades Boulevard  Golden Gate Blvd Vanderbilt Bch Rd Ext Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    14 63 99 Everglades Boulevard  I‐75 (SR‐93)Golden Gate Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    15 37 147 Golden Gate Boulevard  Everglades Blvd Desoto Boulevard Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    16 58 105 Golden Gate Boulevard Ext Desoto Blvd Big Cypress Parkway New 4‐Lane  Road  17 31 161 Goodlette‐Frank Road  Vanderbilt Beach Road Immokalee Road   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    18 66 91 Green Boulevard  Santa Barbara/ Logan Boulevard Sunshine Boulevard Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   19 27 166 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW 23rd St SW Wilson Blvd Ext  New 2‐Lane  (Future Study  Area) 20 33 154 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW CR 951 23rd Street SW New 4‐Lane  (Future Study  Area) 21 42 138 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW Wilson Blvd Ext Everglades Boulevard New 2‐Lane  Road 22 60 102 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Everglades Blvd New Interchange 23 8 250 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Golden Gate Parkway @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 24 2 285 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Collier Blvd (SR 951) @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 25 22 180 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Immokalee Rd @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 26 18 190 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Pine Ridge Rd @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 27 40 146 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new)(not in  SIS) Vanderbilt Beach Rd New Interchange  ‐ Partial (to /  from the North) 29 5 269 I‐75 (SR‐93) Managed (Toll) Lanes Collier Blvd (CR 951)Collier/Lee County Line   New 4‐Lane  Express (Toll)  Lanes 30 7 251 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) Camp Keais Rd Carver St Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4  Lanes   31 23 172 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) SR 29 Airpark Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4  Lanes  32 81 72 Keane Avenue Inez Rd Wilson Blvd Ext. New 2‐Lane  Road (Future  Study Area) 33 50 127 Little League Rd. Ext. SR‐82 Westclox St.New 2‐Lane  Road 34 65 92 Logan Boulevard  Green Boulevard Pine Ridge Road   Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   35 52 125 Logan Boulevard  Vanderbilt Beach Road Immokalee Road   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    36 67 89 Logan Boulevard  Pine Ridge Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    37 38 147 Oil Well Road / CR 858 Everglades Blvd Oil Well Grade Rd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes 38 46 131 Oil Well Road / CR 858 Ave Maria Entrance Camp Keais Road Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes    39 10 236 Old US 41 US 41 (SR 45)Lee/Collier County Line Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes 40 45 135 Orange Blossom Drive  Airport Pulling Road Livingston Road   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes     42 39 147 Randall Boulevard 8th St NE Everglades Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes    43 59 103 Randall Boulevard Everglades Blvd Desoto Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    44 61 101 Randall Boulevard Ext. Desoto Blvd Big Cypress Parkway New 4‐Lane  Road  45 44 136 Santa Barbara Boulevard  Painted Leaf Lane Green Boulevard   Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   46 56 112 SR 29 SR 82 Collier/Hendry Line Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes 48 49 128 SR 29 I‐75 (SR 93)Oil Well Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes  50 24 172 SR 29  New Market Road North   North of SR‐82 Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   51 13 212 SR 29/New Market Road W ‐ New Road Immokalee Rd (CR 846)New Market Road North  Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   52 3 277 SR 29  Agriculture Way CR 846 E Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   53 15 197 SR 29  Sunniland Nursery Rd Agriculture Way Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   54 16 197 SR 29  Oil Well Road Sunniland Nursery Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   55 6 263 SR 84 (Davis Blvd) Airport Pulling Rd Santa Barbara Blvd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   56 9 242 Collier Blvd (SR 951) South of Manatee Rd North of Tower Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   57 4 275 Critical Needs Intersection @ US 41 Goodlette Rd @ US 41 Intersection Improvement 58 12 219 US 41 Greenway Rd 6 L Farm Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   59 11 232 Critical Needs Intersection @ US 41 Collier Blvd (SR 951) @ US 41 Intersection Improvement 60 14 201 US 41 Immokalee Road Old US 41 Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   62 73 75 Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext 16th St Big Cypress Parkway New 2‐Lane Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 63 53 122 Westclox Street Extension Little League Road West of Carson Road New 2‐Lane  Road 64 30 162 Wilson Blvd Golden Gate Boulevard Immokalee Rd   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    65 32 156 Wilson Blvd Keane Ave Golden Gate Boulevard New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 66 17 195 Immokalee Rd intersection Livingston Rd Intersection Improvement 67 57 106 Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension Strand Blvd I‐75 New 4‐Lane  Road  68 83 45 Big Cypress Parkway intersection (new) Oil Well Grade Rd New At‐Grade Intersection 70 68 86 Green Boulevard Extension Everglades Blvd Big Cypress Parkway New 2‐Lane  Road 73 20 190 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) intersection Collier Blvd (CR 951) Intersection Improvement 74 28 165 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) intersection Wilson Blvd Intersection Improvement 75 55 115 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new) (not in  SIS) Veterans Memorial Blvd New Partial Interchange 76 43 137 Vanderbilt Drive Immokalee Rd Woods Edge Parkway Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    77 25 170 Pine Ridge Rd intersection Livingston Rd Intersection Improvement 78 29 165 Golden Gate Parkway intersection Livingston Rd Intersection Improvement 80 47 131 Vanderbilt Beach Road Goodlette‐Frank Road  Airport Pulling Road  Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   81 74 75 Bridge @ 47th Avenue NE West of Everglades Boulevard New Bridge over Canal 82 75 75 Bridge @ Wilson Boulevard South of 33rd Avenue NE New Bridge over Canal 83 69 85 Bridge @ 18th Ave NE between Wilson Boulevard N and 8th  Street NE New Bridge over Canal 84 76 75 Bridge @ 18th Ave NE between 8th Street NE and 16th Street  NE New Bridge over Canal 85 64 95 Bridge @ 13th Street NW north end at proposed Vanderbilt Beach  Road Extension New Bridge over Canal 86 77 75 Bridge @ 16th Street SE South end New Bridge over Canal 87 78 75 Bridge @ Location TBD ‐ Assume 10th  Avenue SE East of Everglades Blvd New Bridge over Canal 88 48 130 Bridge @Wilson Boulevard South,  south end New Bridge over Canal 89 79 75 Bridge @ 62nd Avenue NE  West of 40th Street NE New Bridge over Canal 90 26 167 Pine Ridge Rd Logan Blvd S Collier Blvd (CR 951) Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   93 32 157 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 43rd Ave NE/Shady Hollow Blvd E North of 47th Avenue NE/Immokalee Widen from 2‐Lanes to 4‐Lanes 94 57 113 Immokalee Road Rural Village Blvd  (new) Immokalee Rd (CR 846)Immokalee Rd (CR 846)New 4‐Lane Road 41A 19 190 Critical Needs Intersection @  Immokalee Rd Immokalee Road @ Randall Blvd Ultimate Intersection  Improvement: Overpass 41B 36 151 Randall Boulevard Immokalee Road 8th St NE Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes    Note: Does not include Critical Needs Intersections [#95 through #114]; it was necessary to rank or prioritize Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Needs Assessment Plan Table 1B.Draft Evaluation Matrix DRAFT ‐ July 2020; updated 9/3/2020 Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score                   (20) 0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                   (20) 0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                   (12) 0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                     (8) 0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                   (16) 0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                   (12) 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                     (8) 5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                     (8) 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 5                    30 0                   (12) 0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   5                    30 0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 0                      ‐   5                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 0                      ‐   5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 0                      ‐   5                   (16) 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 0                      ‐   5                     (4) 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 5                    30 5                   (16) 0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   5                    30 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 0                      ‐   5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 5                    45 0                      ‐   5                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                     (8) 0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                     (4) 5                    25 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   5                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 5                    30 5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    30 5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    30 5                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 5                    45 5                    30 0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐                         ‐   5                    45 5                    30 5                     (8) 5                    25 0                      ‐                         ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                   (12) 5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                     (8) 5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 5                    30 0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   5                    30 0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 5                    30 5                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                     (4) 5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                     (8) 5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                     (4) 5                    25 0                      ‐   0                      ‐                         ‐   5                    30 5                     (4) 5                    25 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    30 5                     (4) 5                    25 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    30 5                     (4) 0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   5                    30 0                     (4) 5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 5                    30 5                     (4) 5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 5                    30 5                     (4) 5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 5                    30 5                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   5                    30 0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   5                    30 0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   5                     (4) 5                    25 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    30 5                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    30 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    30 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                     (4) 5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 0                      ‐   5                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    30 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    30 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    30 0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    30 5                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                   (20) 5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   5                    30 0                     (4) 5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 0                      ‐   5                    30 5                     (4) 0                      ‐   5                    25 5                    45 0                      ‐   5                    30 0                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 0                      ‐   5                      ‐   5                    25 0                      ‐   5                    45 5                    45 0                      ‐   0 of habitat  t based on  er habitat 3A ‐ Improvements to  existing infrastructure 3B ‐ The project is a new  facility that improves  connectivity Reduce existing congestion 4A ‐ Improvement to an existing  deficient facility, or improvement to a  new or neighboring facility intended to  relieve an existing deficient facility 5. Promote Freight  Movement3. Improve System Continuity and Connectivity 4. Reduce Roadway Congestion ‐ TBD                          4.00                 5.00                                          5.00                                          9.00                                          9.00                                          6.00                                           Does the project improve  connectivity with a new  roadway facility (all  extensions are gaps in that  they connect to a future or  existing road)? Yes = 5 No = 0 Does the project increase  capacity or provide relief to  a parallel facility (i.e. new  facilities, bridges over  canals, etc.)? Yes = 5 No = 0 Did capacity ratio  (AADT/LOS D service  volumes) decrease?  (compare 2045 E+C to Alt 2  traffic model plots) Yes = 5 No = 0 Is the roadway on a  Regional Freight Mobility  Corridor, Freight  Distribution Route, or  connects to a Freight  Activity Center as outlined  in the 2040 LRTP? Yes = 5 No = 0 Yes No  ‐1  ‐2 ‐5 (max) Does the project improve  mobility in an existing  roadway facility (i.e.  widening, intersection  improvements, etc.)? Yes = 5 No = 0 5 ‐Project enhances the  facility identified as a major  freight route 6A ‐ Enhanc transportation Reduce existing congestion 4B ‐ To what extent will poor LOS  intersections, and roadway segments  be improved? PAGE 2 OF 5 10/22/2020 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1009 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) 2045  Map ID 2045  RANK 2045  Weighted  Score Project From To Description 1 51 126 Benfield Road Extension The Lords Way City Gate Boulevard North New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 2 41 138 Benfield Road  US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail East)Rattlesnake‐Hammock Ext New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 372 75Big Cypress Parkway North of I‐75 Golden Gate Blvd New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 470 83Big Cypress Parkway Golden Gate Blvd Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext. New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 571 81Big Cypress Parkway Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext.Oil Well  Road New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 682 52Big Cypress Parkway Oil Well  Road Immokalee Rd New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 7 62 100 Camp Keais Road Pope John Paul Blvd Oil Well Road Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes 880 74Camp Keais Road  Immokalee Road Pope John Paul Blvd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lanes   9 1 286 Collier Blvd (CR 951) Golden Gate Main Canal Green Blvd Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6  Lanes 10 21 182 CR 951 Extension (new) Heritage Bay Entrance (Collier Blvd (CR  951) northern terminus)Lee/Collier County Line New 2‐Lane  Road 11 34 152 Everglades Boulevard  Randall Blvd South of Oil Well Road Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    12 35 152 Everglades Boulevard  Vanderbilt Bch Rd Ext Randall Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    13 54 121 Everglades Boulevard  Golden Gate Blvd Vanderbilt Bch Rd Ext Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    14 63 99 Everglades Boulevard  I‐75 (SR‐93)Golden Gate Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    15 37 147 Golden Gate Boulevard  Everglades Blvd Desoto Boulevard Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    16 58 105 Golden Gate Boulevard Ext Desoto Blvd Big Cypress Parkway New 4‐Lane  Road  17 31 161 Goodlette‐Frank Road  Vanderbilt Beach Road Immokalee Road   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    18 66 91 Green Boulevard  Santa Barbara/ Logan Boulevard Sunshine Boulevard Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   19 27 166 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW 23rd St SW Wilson Blvd Ext  New 2‐Lane  (Future Study  Area) 20 33 154 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW CR 951 23rd Street SW New 4‐Lane  (Future Study  Area) 21 42 138 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW Wilson Blvd Ext Everglades Boulevard New 2‐Lane  Road 22 60 102 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Everglades Blvd New Interchange 23 8 250 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Golden Gate Parkway @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 24 2 285 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Collier Blvd (SR 951) @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 25 22 180 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Immokalee Rd @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 26 18 190 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Pine Ridge Rd @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 27 40 146 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new)(not in  SIS) Vanderbilt Beach Rd New Interchange  ‐ Partial (to /  from the North) 29 5 269 I‐75 (SR‐93) Managed (Toll) Lanes Collier Blvd (CR 951)Collier/Lee County Line   New 4‐Lane  Express (Toll)  Lanes 30 7 251 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) Camp Keais Rd Carver St Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4  Lanes   31 23 172 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) SR 29 Airpark Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4  Lanes  32 81 72 Keane Avenue Inez Rd Wilson Blvd Ext. New 2‐Lane  Road (Future  Study Area) 33 50 127 Little League Rd. Ext. SR‐82 Westclox St.New 2‐Lane  Road 34 65 92 Logan Boulevard  Green Boulevard Pine Ridge Road   Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   35 52 125 Logan Boulevard  Vanderbilt Beach Road Immokalee Road   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    36 67 89 Logan Boulevard  Pine Ridge Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    37 38 147 Oil Well Road / CR 858 Everglades Blvd Oil Well Grade Rd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes 38 46 131 Oil Well Road / CR 858 Ave Maria Entrance Camp Keais Road Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes    39 10 236 Old US 41 US 41 (SR 45)Lee/Collier County Line Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes 40 45 135 Orange Blossom Drive  Airport Pulling Road Livingston Road   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes     42 39 147 Randall Boulevard 8th St NE Everglades Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes    43 59 103 Randall Boulevard Everglades Blvd Desoto Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    44 61 101 Randall Boulevard Ext. Desoto Blvd Big Cypress Parkway New 4‐Lane  Road  45 44 136 Santa Barbara Boulevard  Painted Leaf Lane Green Boulevard   Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   46 56 112 SR 29 SR 82 Collier/Hendry Line Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes 48 49 128 SR 29 I‐75 (SR 93)Oil Well Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes  50 24 172 SR 29  New Market Road North   North of SR‐82 Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   51 13 212 SR 29/New Market Road W ‐ New Road Immokalee Rd (CR 846)New Market Road North  Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   52 3 277 SR 29  Agriculture Way CR 846 E Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   53 15 197 SR 29  Sunniland Nursery Rd Agriculture Way Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   54 16 197 SR 29  Oil Well Road Sunniland Nursery Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   55 6 263 SR 84 (Davis Blvd) Airport Pulling Rd Santa Barbara Blvd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   56 9 242 Collier Blvd (SR 951) South of Manatee Rd North of Tower Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   57 4 275 Critical Needs Intersection @ US 41 Goodlette Rd @ US 41 Intersection Improvement 58 12 219 US 41 Greenway Rd 6 L Farm Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   59 11 232 Critical Needs Intersection @ US 41 Collier Blvd (SR 951) @ US 41 Intersection Improvement 60 14 201 US 41 Immokalee Road Old US 41 Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   62 73 75 Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext 16th St Big Cypress Parkway New 2‐Lane Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 63 53 122 Westclox Street Extension Little League Road West of Carson Road New 2‐Lane  Road 64 30 162 Wilson Blvd Golden Gate Boulevard Immokalee Rd   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    65 32 156 Wilson Blvd Keane Ave Golden Gate Boulevard New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 66 17 195 Immokalee Rd intersection Livingston Rd Intersection Improvement 67 57 106 Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension Strand Blvd I‐75 New 4‐Lane  Road  68 83 45 Big Cypress Parkway intersection (new) Oil Well Grade Rd New At‐Grade Intersection 70 68 86 Green Boulevard Extension Everglades Blvd Big Cypress Parkway New 2‐Lane  Road 73 20 190 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) intersection Collier Blvd (CR 951) Intersection Improvement 74 28 165 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) intersection Wilson Blvd Intersection Improvement 75 55 115 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new) (not in  SIS) Veterans Memorial Blvd New Partial Interchange 76 43 137 Vanderbilt Drive Immokalee Rd Woods Edge Parkway Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    77 25 170 Pine Ridge Rd intersection Livingston Rd Intersection Improvement 78 29 165 Golden Gate Parkway intersection Livingston Rd Intersection Improvement 80 47 131 Vanderbilt Beach Road Goodlette‐Frank Road  Airport Pulling Road  Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   81 74 75 Bridge @ 47th Avenue NE West of Everglades Boulevard New Bridge over Canal 82 75 75 Bridge @ Wilson Boulevard South of 33rd Avenue NE New Bridge over Canal 83 69 85 Bridge @ 18th Ave NE between Wilson Boulevard N and 8th  Street NE New Bridge over Canal 84 76 75 Bridge @ 18th Ave NE between 8th Street NE and 16th Street  NE New Bridge over Canal 85 64 95 Bridge @ 13th Street NW north end at proposed Vanderbilt Beach  Road Extension New Bridge over Canal 86 77 75 Bridge @ 16th Street SE South end New Bridge over Canal 87 78 75 Bridge @ Location TBD ‐ Assume 10th  Avenue SE East of Everglades Blvd New Bridge over Canal 88 48 130 Bridge @Wilson Boulevard South,  south end New Bridge over Canal 89 79 75 Bridge @ 62nd Avenue NE  West of 40th Street NE New Bridge over Canal 90 26 167 Pine Ridge Rd Logan Blvd S Collier Blvd (CR 951) Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   93 32 157 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 43rd Ave NE/Shady Hollow Blvd E North of 47th Avenue NE/Immokalee Widen from 2‐Lanes to 4‐Lanes 94 57 113 Immokalee Road Rural Village Blvd  (new) Immokalee Rd (CR 846)Immokalee Rd (CR 846)New 4‐Lane Road 41A 19 190 Critical Needs Intersection @  Immokalee Rd Immokalee Road @ Randall Blvd Ultimate Intersection  Improvement: Overpass 41B 36 151 Randall Boulevard Immokalee Road 8th St NE Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes    Note: Does not include Critical Needs Intersections [#95 through #114]; it was necessary to rank or prioritize Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Needs Assessment Plan Table 1B.Draft Evaluation Matrix DRAFT ‐ July 2020; updated 9/3/2020 Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 5                    10 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 5                    10 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 5                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 5                    10 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 5                    10 5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    20 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 5                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                    10 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 5                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐    7A ‐ Trail improvements 7B ‐ Multimodal  improvement near health  care, educational,  recreational, and/or cultural  facilities 7C ‐ Mu improvem socioec neighborhoo >10 6. Increase the Safety of Transportation System Users 7.                            2.00                 4.00                                          2.00                                          2.00                                                                                      2.00                                             2.00  Yes = 5 No = 0 High crash location or  segment for  bike/pedestrian conflicts? Yes = 5 No = 0 New or improved  trail/greenways  = 5  No new or improved trail =  0 Improvement W/I 0.25  miles=5 Improvement not w/I 0.25  mile=0 Improvem No improve = 5 = 0 High crash location or  segment? Yes = 5 No = 0 ces safety of  n system users 6B ‐ Improves facility or  intersection identified as  having a high crash  occurrence or a fatality 6C‐ Traffic calming  6D ‐ Safety improvements  that improve or reduce  vehicular conflicts with  bicycles and pedestrians PAGE 3 OF 5 10/22/2020 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1010 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) 2045  Map ID 2045  RANK 2045  Weighted  Score Project From To Description 1 51 126 Benfield Road Extension The Lords Way City Gate Boulevard North New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 2 41 138 Benfield Road  US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail East)Rattlesnake‐Hammock Ext New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 372 75Big Cypress Parkway North of I‐75 Golden Gate Blvd New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 470 83Big Cypress Parkway Golden Gate Blvd Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext. New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 571 81Big Cypress Parkway Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext.Oil Well  Road New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 682 52Big Cypress Parkway Oil Well  Road Immokalee Rd New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 7 62 100 Camp Keais Road Pope John Paul Blvd Oil Well Road Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes 880 74Camp Keais Road  Immokalee Road Pope John Paul Blvd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lanes   9 1 286 Collier Blvd (CR 951) Golden Gate Main Canal Green Blvd Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6  Lanes 10 21 182 CR 951 Extension (new) Heritage Bay Entrance (Collier Blvd (CR  951) northern terminus)Lee/Collier County Line New 2‐Lane  Road 11 34 152 Everglades Boulevard  Randall Blvd South of Oil Well Road Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    12 35 152 Everglades Boulevard  Vanderbilt Bch Rd Ext Randall Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    13 54 121 Everglades Boulevard  Golden Gate Blvd Vanderbilt Bch Rd Ext Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    14 63 99 Everglades Boulevard  I‐75 (SR‐93)Golden Gate Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    15 37 147 Golden Gate Boulevard  Everglades Blvd Desoto Boulevard Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    16 58 105 Golden Gate Boulevard Ext Desoto Blvd Big Cypress Parkway New 4‐Lane  Road  17 31 161 Goodlette‐Frank Road  Vanderbilt Beach Road Immokalee Road   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    18 66 91 Green Boulevard  Santa Barbara/ Logan Boulevard Sunshine Boulevard Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   19 27 166 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW 23rd St SW Wilson Blvd Ext  New 2‐Lane  (Future Study  Area) 20 33 154 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW CR 951 23rd Street SW New 4‐Lane  (Future Study  Area) 21 42 138 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW Wilson Blvd Ext Everglades Boulevard New 2‐Lane  Road 22 60 102 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Everglades Blvd New Interchange 23 8 250 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Golden Gate Parkway @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 24 2 285 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Collier Blvd (SR 951) @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 25 22 180 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Immokalee Rd @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 26 18 190 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Pine Ridge Rd @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 27 40 146 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new)(not in  SIS) Vanderbilt Beach Rd New Interchange  ‐ Partial (to /  from the North) 29 5 269 I‐75 (SR‐93) Managed (Toll) Lanes Collier Blvd (CR 951)Collier/Lee County Line   New 4‐Lane  Express (Toll)  Lanes 30 7 251 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) Camp Keais Rd Carver St Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4  Lanes   31 23 172 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) SR 29 Airpark Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4  Lanes  32 81 72 Keane Avenue Inez Rd Wilson Blvd Ext. New 2‐Lane  Road (Future  Study Area) 33 50 127 Little League Rd. Ext. SR‐82 Westclox St.New 2‐Lane  Road 34 65 92 Logan Boulevard  Green Boulevard Pine Ridge Road   Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   35 52 125 Logan Boulevard  Vanderbilt Beach Road Immokalee Road   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    36 67 89 Logan Boulevard  Pine Ridge Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    37 38 147 Oil Well Road / CR 858 Everglades Blvd Oil Well Grade Rd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes 38 46 131 Oil Well Road / CR 858 Ave Maria Entrance Camp Keais Road Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes    39 10 236 Old US 41 US 41 (SR 45)Lee/Collier County Line Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes 40 45 135 Orange Blossom Drive  Airport Pulling Road Livingston Road   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes     42 39 147 Randall Boulevard 8th St NE Everglades Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes    43 59 103 Randall Boulevard Everglades Blvd Desoto Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    44 61 101 Randall Boulevard Ext. Desoto Blvd Big Cypress Parkway New 4‐Lane  Road  45 44 136 Santa Barbara Boulevard  Painted Leaf Lane Green Boulevard   Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   46 56 112 SR 29 SR 82 Collier/Hendry Line Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes 48 49 128 SR 29 I‐75 (SR 93)Oil Well Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes  50 24 172 SR 29  New Market Road North   North of SR‐82 Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   51 13 212 SR 29/New Market Road W ‐ New Road Immokalee Rd (CR 846)New Market Road North  Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   52 3 277 SR 29  Agriculture Way CR 846 E Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   53 15 197 SR 29  Sunniland Nursery Rd Agriculture Way Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   54 16 197 SR 29  Oil Well Road Sunniland Nursery Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   55 6 263 SR 84 (Davis Blvd) Airport Pulling Rd Santa Barbara Blvd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   56 9 242 Collier Blvd (SR 951) South of Manatee Rd North of Tower Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   57 4 275 Critical Needs Intersection @ US 41 Goodlette Rd @ US 41 Intersection Improvement 58 12 219 US 41 Greenway Rd 6 L Farm Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   59 11 232 Critical Needs Intersection @ US 41 Collier Blvd (SR 951) @ US 41 Intersection Improvement 60 14 201 US 41 Immokalee Road Old US 41 Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   62 73 75 Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext 16th St Big Cypress Parkway New 2‐Lane Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 63 53 122 Westclox Street Extension Little League Road West of Carson Road New 2‐Lane  Road 64 30 162 Wilson Blvd Golden Gate Boulevard Immokalee Rd   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    65 32 156 Wilson Blvd Keane Ave Golden Gate Boulevard New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 66 17 195 Immokalee Rd intersection Livingston Rd Intersection Improvement 67 57 106 Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension Strand Blvd I‐75 New 4‐Lane  Road  68 83 45 Big Cypress Parkway intersection (new) Oil Well Grade Rd New At‐Grade Intersection 70 68 86 Green Boulevard Extension Everglades Blvd Big Cypress Parkway New 2‐Lane  Road 73 20 190 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) intersection Collier Blvd (CR 951) Intersection Improvement 74 28 165 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) intersection Wilson Blvd Intersection Improvement 75 55 115 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new) (not in  SIS) Veterans Memorial Blvd New Partial Interchange 76 43 137 Vanderbilt Drive Immokalee Rd Woods Edge Parkway Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    77 25 170 Pine Ridge Rd intersection Livingston Rd Intersection Improvement 78 29 165 Golden Gate Parkway intersection Livingston Rd Intersection Improvement 80 47 131 Vanderbilt Beach Road Goodlette‐Frank Road  Airport Pulling Road  Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   81 74 75 Bridge @ 47th Avenue NE West of Everglades Boulevard New Bridge over Canal 82 75 75 Bridge @ Wilson Boulevard South of 33rd Avenue NE New Bridge over Canal 83 69 85 Bridge @ 18th Ave NE between Wilson Boulevard N and 8th  Street NE New Bridge over Canal 84 76 75 Bridge @ 18th Ave NE between 8th Street NE and 16th Street  NE New Bridge over Canal 85 64 95 Bridge @ 13th Street NW north end at proposed Vanderbilt Beach  Road Extension New Bridge over Canal 86 77 75 Bridge @ 16th Street SE South end New Bridge over Canal 87 78 75 Bridge @ Location TBD ‐ Assume 10th  Avenue SE East of Everglades Blvd New Bridge over Canal 88 48 130 Bridge @Wilson Boulevard South,  south end New Bridge over Canal 89 79 75 Bridge @ 62nd Avenue NE  West of 40th Street NE New Bridge over Canal 90 26 167 Pine Ridge Rd Logan Blvd S Collier Blvd (CR 951) Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   93 32 157 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 43rd Ave NE/Shady Hollow Blvd E North of 47th Avenue NE/Immokalee Widen from 2‐Lanes to 4‐Lanes 94 57 113 Immokalee Road Rural Village Blvd  (new) Immokalee Rd (CR 846)Immokalee Rd (CR 846)New 4‐Lane Road 41A 19 190 Critical Needs Intersection @  Immokalee Rd Immokalee Road @ Randall Blvd Ultimate Intersection  Improvement: Overpass 41B 36 151 Randall Boulevard Immokalee Road 8th St NE Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes    Note: Does not include Critical Needs Intersections [#95 through #114]; it was necessary to rank or prioritize Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Needs Assessment Plan Table 1B.Draft Evaluation Matrix DRAFT ‐ July 2020; updated 9/3/2020 Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score                    10 5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                    10 5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 5                    10 0                    10 5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                    10 5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 5                    10 0                    10 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20                       ‐   0                    10 5                       5 5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 5                    10 0                    10 5                       5 5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 5                    10 5                    10 5                       5 0                      ‐   5                       5 5                    20 5                    10 5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                    10 5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                    10 5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                    10 5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 5                    10 0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   5                    10 5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 5                    10 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 5                    10 5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   5                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 5                    10 0                    10 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 5                    10 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 5                    10 0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 5                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                    10 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                    10 5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                    10 0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐                         ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 5                    10 5                       5 5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    10 0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0 8A ‐ Improve access to  regional travel (e.g.  Interstates, Airports, Ports,  and SIS) 8B ‐ Improve access to  tourist destinations 8C ‐ Suppo redevelopm (multimodal a improve ltimodal  ent to low  onomic  ods (poverty  0%) 7D ‐ Transit improvements  outside of current service  area(SA) or within a CRA 7E ‐ Bicycle or pedestrian  improvement to transit  access 7F ‐ Bicycle/pedestrian  infrastructure separation  from vehicle travel lanes Promote Multimodal Solutions 8. Promote the Integrated Plannin                                            2.00                                             1.00                                             2.00                                             1.00                                             4.00                                             2.00  Improve Access = 5 No improvement = 0 Improvement = 5 No improvement = 0 Improves access=5 Does not improve access=0 Improves access=5 Does not improve access=0 Yes No ent W/I=5 ment W/I=0 Outside the TSA (bus route)  = 5 Inside a CRA = 5 No improvement = 0 PAGE 4 OF 5 10/22/2020 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1011 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) 2045  Map ID 2045  RANK 2045  Weighted  Score Project From To Description 1 51 126 Benfield Road Extension The Lords Way City Gate Boulevard North New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 2 41 138 Benfield Road  US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail East)Rattlesnake‐Hammock Ext New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 372 75Big Cypress Parkway North of I‐75 Golden Gate Blvd New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 470 83Big Cypress Parkway Golden Gate Blvd Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext. New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 571 81Big Cypress Parkway Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext.Oil Well  Road New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 682 52Big Cypress Parkway Oil Well  Road Immokalee Rd New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 7 62 100 Camp Keais Road Pope John Paul Blvd Oil Well Road Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes 880 74Camp Keais Road  Immokalee Road Pope John Paul Blvd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lanes   9 1 286 Collier Blvd (CR 951) Golden Gate Main Canal Green Blvd Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6  Lanes 10 21 182 CR 951 Extension (new) Heritage Bay Entrance (Collier Blvd (CR  951) northern terminus)Lee/Collier County Line New 2‐Lane  Road 11 34 152 Everglades Boulevard  Randall Blvd South of Oil Well Road Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    12 35 152 Everglades Boulevard  Vanderbilt Bch Rd Ext Randall Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    13 54 121 Everglades Boulevard  Golden Gate Blvd Vanderbilt Bch Rd Ext Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    14 63 99 Everglades Boulevard  I‐75 (SR‐93)Golden Gate Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    15 37 147 Golden Gate Boulevard  Everglades Blvd Desoto Boulevard Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    16 58 105 Golden Gate Boulevard Ext Desoto Blvd Big Cypress Parkway New 4‐Lane  Road  17 31 161 Goodlette‐Frank Road  Vanderbilt Beach Road Immokalee Road   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    18 66 91 Green Boulevard  Santa Barbara/ Logan Boulevard Sunshine Boulevard Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   19 27 166 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW 23rd St SW Wilson Blvd Ext  New 2‐Lane  (Future Study  Area) 20 33 154 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW CR 951 23rd Street SW New 4‐Lane  (Future Study  Area) 21 42 138 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW Wilson Blvd Ext Everglades Boulevard New 2‐Lane  Road 22 60 102 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Everglades Blvd New Interchange 23 8 250 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Golden Gate Parkway @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 24 2 285 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Collier Blvd (SR 951) @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 25 22 180 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Immokalee Rd @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 26 18 190 Critical Needs Intersection @ I‐75 Pine Ridge Rd @ I‐75 Interchange Improvement 27 40 146 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new)(not in  SIS) Vanderbilt Beach Rd New Interchange  ‐ Partial (to /  from the North) 29 5 269 I‐75 (SR‐93) Managed (Toll) Lanes Collier Blvd (CR 951)Collier/Lee County Line   New 4‐Lane  Express (Toll)  Lanes 30 7 251 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) Camp Keais Rd Carver St Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4  Lanes   31 23 172 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) SR 29 Airpark Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4  Lanes  32 81 72 Keane Avenue Inez Rd Wilson Blvd Ext. New 2‐Lane  Road (Future  Study Area) 33 50 127 Little League Rd. Ext. SR‐82 Westclox St.New 2‐Lane  Road 34 65 92 Logan Boulevard  Green Boulevard Pine Ridge Road   Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   35 52 125 Logan Boulevard  Vanderbilt Beach Road Immokalee Road   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    36 67 89 Logan Boulevard  Pine Ridge Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    37 38 147 Oil Well Road / CR 858 Everglades Blvd Oil Well Grade Rd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes 38 46 131 Oil Well Road / CR 858 Ave Maria Entrance Camp Keais Road Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes    39 10 236 Old US 41 US 41 (SR 45)Lee/Collier County Line Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes 40 45 135 Orange Blossom Drive  Airport Pulling Road Livingston Road   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes     42 39 147 Randall Boulevard 8th St NE Everglades Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes    43 59 103 Randall Boulevard Everglades Blvd Desoto Blvd Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    44 61 101 Randall Boulevard Ext. Desoto Blvd Big Cypress Parkway New 4‐Lane  Road  45 44 136 Santa Barbara Boulevard  Painted Leaf Lane Green Boulevard   Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   46 56 112 SR 29 SR 82 Collier/Hendry Line Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes 48 49 128 SR 29 I‐75 (SR 93)Oil Well Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes  50 24 172 SR 29  New Market Road North   North of SR‐82 Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   51 13 212 SR 29/New Market Road W ‐ New Road Immokalee Rd (CR 846)New Market Road North  Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   52 3 277 SR 29  Agriculture Way CR 846 E Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   53 15 197 SR 29  Sunniland Nursery Rd Agriculture Way Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   54 16 197 SR 29  Oil Well Road Sunniland Nursery Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   55 6 263 SR 84 (Davis Blvd) Airport Pulling Rd Santa Barbara Blvd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   56 9 242 Collier Blvd (SR 951) South of Manatee Rd North of Tower Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   57 4 275 Critical Needs Intersection @ US 41 Goodlette Rd @ US 41 Intersection Improvement 58 12 219 US 41 Greenway Rd 6 L Farm Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   59 11 232 Critical Needs Intersection @ US 41 Collier Blvd (SR 951) @ US 41 Intersection Improvement 60 14 201 US 41 Immokalee Road Old US 41 Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4‐Lane   62 73 75 Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext 16th St Big Cypress Parkway New 2‐Lane Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 63 53 122 Westclox Street Extension Little League Road West of Carson Road New 2‐Lane  Road 64 30 162 Wilson Blvd Golden Gate Boulevard Immokalee Rd   Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    65 32 156 Wilson Blvd Keane Ave Golden Gate Boulevard New 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable  to 4‐Lanes) 66 17 195 Immokalee Rd intersection Livingston Rd Intersection Improvement 67 57 106 Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension Strand Blvd I‐75 New 4‐Lane  Road  68 83 45 Big Cypress Parkway intersection (new) Oil Well Grade Rd New At‐Grade Intersection 70 68 86 Green Boulevard Extension Everglades Blvd Big Cypress Parkway New 2‐Lane  Road 73 20 190 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) intersection Collier Blvd (CR 951) Intersection Improvement 74 28 165 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) intersection Wilson Blvd Intersection Improvement 75 55 115 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new) (not in  SIS) Veterans Memorial Blvd New Partial Interchange 76 43 137 Vanderbilt Drive Immokalee Rd Woods Edge Parkway Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐ Lanes    77 25 170 Pine Ridge Rd intersection Livingston Rd Intersection Improvement 78 29 165 Golden Gate Parkway intersection Livingston Rd Intersection Improvement 80 47 131 Vanderbilt Beach Road Goodlette‐Frank Road  Airport Pulling Road  Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   81 74 75 Bridge @ 47th Avenue NE West of Everglades Boulevard New Bridge over Canal 82 75 75 Bridge @ Wilson Boulevard South of 33rd Avenue NE New Bridge over Canal 83 69 85 Bridge @ 18th Ave NE between Wilson Boulevard N and 8th  Street NE New Bridge over Canal 84 76 75 Bridge @ 18th Ave NE between 8th Street NE and 16th Street  NE New Bridge over Canal 85 64 95 Bridge @ 13th Street NW north end at proposed Vanderbilt Beach  Road Extension New Bridge over Canal 86 77 75 Bridge @ 16th Street SE South end New Bridge over Canal 87 78 75 Bridge @ Location TBD ‐ Assume 10th  Avenue SE East of Everglades Blvd New Bridge over Canal 88 48 130 Bridge @Wilson Boulevard South,  south end New Bridge over Canal 89 79 75 Bridge @ 62nd Avenue NE  West of 40th Street NE New Bridge over Canal 90 26 167 Pine Ridge Rd Logan Blvd S Collier Blvd (CR 951) Widen from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes   93 32 157 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 43rd Ave NE/Shady Hollow Blvd E North of 47th Avenue NE/Immokalee Widen from 2‐Lanes to 4‐Lanes 94 57 113 Immokalee Road Rural Village Blvd  (new) Immokalee Rd (CR 846)Immokalee Rd (CR 846)New 4‐Lane Road 41A 19 190 Critical Needs Intersection @  Immokalee Rd Immokalee Road @ Randall Blvd Ultimate Intersection  Improvement: Overpass 41B 36 151 Randall Boulevard Immokalee Road 8th St NE Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐ Lanes    Note: Does not include Critical Needs Intersections [#95 through #114]; it was necessary to rank or prioritize Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Needs Assessment Plan Table 1B.Draft Evaluation Matrix DRAFT ‐ July 2020; updated 9/3/2020 Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score Raw Score Weighted  Score                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 5                    40 0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 5                    40 3                    12 0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 5                    40 0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   5                    40 0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20                       ‐   5                       5 5                       5 5                    40 0                      ‐   5                    20                       ‐   5                       5 5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20                       ‐   5                       5 5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20                       ‐   5                       5 5                       5 5                    40 0                      ‐   5                    20                       ‐   5                       5 5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20                       ‐   5                       5 5                       5 0                      ‐   3                    12 5                    20                     10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    40 0                      ‐   0                      ‐                      10 0                      ‐   5                       5 5                    40 0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                      10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   5                    40 0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                      10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                      10 0                      ‐   5                       5                       ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                      10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    40 0                      ‐   0                      ‐                      10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                      10 0                      ‐   5                       5 5                    40 3                    12 0                      ‐                        ‐   5                       5 5                       5 5                    40 5                    20 0                      ‐                      10 0                      ‐   5                       5 5                    40 5                    20 5                    20                       ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 5                    40 3                    12 0                      ‐                        ‐   5                       5 5                       5 0                      ‐   3                    12 0                      ‐                        ‐   5                       5 5                       5 0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                      10 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                         ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐                         ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   5                       5 5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20                       ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐                        ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   5                    20 0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   5                    40 0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐                        ‐   0                      ‐   5                       5 0                      ‐   0                      ‐   0                      ‐   rt Targeted  ents or CRAs  and/or vehicle  ements) 8D ‐ Identified as a priority  in partner agency plans  (City, Transit, MPO, etc.) 8E ‐ Vehicle or freight  improvement to an  intermodal facility 11. Consider Autonomous  and Connected Vehicles  (A/V) Technology in the  Futureng of Transportation and Land Use 9. Promote Sustainability in  the Planning of  Transportation and Land  Use 10. Consider Climate  Change Vulnerability and  Risk in Transportation  Decision Making                  2.00                                             1.00                                             1.00                                             8.00                                             4.00                                             4.00  Does the project improve  vehicle or freight movement  to intermodal facilities (i.e.  airport, bus transfer station,  freight center, park‐n‐ride  etc.)  Yes = 5 No = 0 Does the project bring  better mobility to a low  income areas and CRA's  (i.e., bike/ped,  improvement along a bus  route or stop, etc.) Project in target area=5 Project not in target area=0 If project within 0.25 miles  of 1 ft SLR Flooding =5 If project within 0.25 miles  of 1 ft SLR Low Lying Area =  3 Not in high risk area=0 travel modes improved=5 travel modes not  improved=0 s=5 o=0 Connections to other  municipalities or counties Yes = 5 No = 0 Utilize technological  improvements (Intelligent  Transportation Systems,  Transit Signal Priority, etc.) Project benefits low income  areas and improves  sustainability and equity  through increased housing  choices and reduced auto  dependency Project promotes  transportation  infrastructure resiliency in  the face of climate change  and sea level rise PAGE 5 OF 5 10/22/2020 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1012 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Map ID Needs RankingProject From To Description1 51 Benfield Rd. Ext.The Lords WayCity Gate Blvd. NNew Two‐Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes)2 41 Benfield Rd.US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E)Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. New Two‐Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes)372Big Cypress Pkwy.Green Blvd.Golden Gate Blvd.New Two‐Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes)470Big Cypress Pkwy.Golden Gate Blvd.Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext. New Two‐Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes)571Big Cypress Pkwy.Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Ext.Oil Well Rd.New Two‐Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes)682Big Cypress Pkwy.Oil Well Rd.Immokalee Rd.New Two‐Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes)762Camp Keais Rd.Pope John Paul Blvd.Oil Well Rd.Widen from Two to Four Lanes880Camp Keais Rd.Immokalee Rd.Pope John Paul Blvd.Widen from Two to Four Lanes 9 1 Collier Blvd. (CR 951)Golden Gate Main CanalGreen Blvd.Widen from Four to Six Lanes10 21 CR 951 Ext. Collier Blvd. (CR 951) (northern terminus) Lee/Collier County Line New 2‐Lane Road11 34 Everglades Blvd.Randall Blvd.South of Oil Well RoadWiden from Two to Four Lanes  12 35 Everglades Blvd.Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Ext.Randall Blvd.Widen from Two to Four Lanes  13 54 Everglades Blvd.Golden Gate Blvd.Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Ext. Widen from Two to Four Lanes  14 63 Everglades Blvd.I‐75 (SR‐93)Golden Gate Blvd.Widen from Two to Four Lanes  15 37 Golden Gate Blvd.Everglades Blvd.Desoto Blvd.Widen from Two to Four Lanes  16 58 Golden Gate Blvd. Ext.Desoto Blvd.Big Cypress Pkwy.New Four‐Lane Road 17 31 Goodlette‐Frank Rd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd.Immokalee Rd. Widen from Two to Four Lanes  18 66 Green Blvd. Santa Barbara Blvd./ Logan Blvd. Sunshine Blvd.Widen from Two to Four Lanes  19 27 Green Boulevard Ext. (16th Ave. SW)23rd St. SW Wilson Blvd. Ext.New Two‐Lane (Future Study Area)20 33 Green Boulevard Ext. (16th Ave. SW)Collier Blvd. (CR 951)23rd St. SWNew Four‐Lane (Future Study Area)21 42 Green Boulevard Ext. (16th Ave. SW)Wilson Blvd. ExtEverglades Blvd.New Two‐Lane Road22 60 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange Everglades Blvd.New Interchange23 8 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (modified)Golden Gate Pkwy.Interchange Improvement24 2 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (modified)Collier Blvd. (CR 951)Interchange Improvement25 22 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (modified)Immokalee Rd.Interchange improvement (DDI proposed)27 40 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new)Vanderbilt Beach Rd.New Interchange ‐ Partial (to/from the north)29 5 I‐75 (SR‐93) Managed (Toll) LanesCollier Blvd. (CR 951)Collier/Lee County Line New Ten‐Lane Express (Toll) Lanes30 7 Immokalee Rd. (CR 846)Camp Keais Rd.Carver St.Widen from Two to Four Lanes 31 23 CR 846 ESR 29Airpark Blvd.Widen from Two to Four Lanes 32 81 Keane Ave.Inez Rd.Wilson Blvd. Ext.New Two‐Lane Road (Future Study Area)33 50 Little League Rd. Ext.SR 82Westclox St.New Two‐Lane Road34 65 Logan Blvd. Green Blvd.Pine Ridge Rd.Widen from Four to Six Lanes 35 52 Logan Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd.Immokalee Rd.Widen from Two to Four Lanes  36 67 Logan Blvd. Pine Ridge Rd.Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Widen from Two to Four Lanes  37 38 Oil Well RoadCR 858Everglades Blvd.Oil Well Grade Rd.Widen from Two to Six Lanes38 46 Oil Well RoadCR 858Ave Maria EntranceCamp Keais Rd.Widen from Two to Six Lanes  39 10 Old US 41US 41 (Tamiami Trail E)Lee/Collier County Line Widen from Two to Four Lanes40 45 Orange Blossom DriveAirport Pulling Rd.Livingston Rd.Widen from Two to Four Lanes 41A 19 Randall Blvd. Intersection (flyover)Immokalee Rd.Ultimate Intersection Improvement: Overpass41B 36 Randall Blvd. Immokalee Rd.8th St. NEWiden from Two to Six Lanes 42 39 Randall Blvd. 8th St. NEEverglades Blvd.Widen from Two to Six Lanes 43 59 Randall Blvd. Everglades Blvd.Desoto Blvd.Widen from Two to Four Lanes 44 61 Randall Blvd. Desoto Blvd.Big Cypress Pkwy.New Four‐Lane Road 45 44 Santa Barbara Blvd. Painted Leaf Ln.Green Blvd. Widen from Four to Six Lanes 46 56 SR 29SR 82Collier/Hendry LineWiden from Two to Four Lanes48 49 SR 29I‐75 (SR 93)Oil Well Rd. Widen from Two to Four Lanes 50 24 SR 29 New Market Road North/Westclox Street North of SR 82Widen from Two to Four Lanes 51 13 SR 29/New Market Rd. W (New Road)CR 846 ENew Market Rd. N New Four‐Lane Road 52 3 SR 29Agriculture WayCR 846 EWiden from Two to Four Lanes 53 15 SR 29 Sunniland Nursery Rd.Agriculture WayWiden from Two to Four Lanes 54 16 SR 29Oil Well Rd. Sunniland Nursery Rd.Widen from Two to Four Lanes55 6 SR 84 (Davis Blvd.)Airport Pulling Rd.Santa Barbara Blvd.Widen from Four to Six Lanes Table 1A.2045 Needs Plan List of ProjectsPAGE 1 OF 210/22/202010.A.2Packet Pg. 1013Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Map ID Needs RankingProject From To DescriptionTable 1A. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects56 9 Collier Blvd. (SR 951) South of Manatee Rd. North of Tower Rd. Widen from Four to Six Lanes57 4 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersectionGoodlette‐Frank Rd.Major Intersection Improvement58 12 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E)Greenway Rd.6 L Farm RdWiden from Two to Four Lanes59 11 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersectionCollier Blvd. (SR 951)Major Intersection Improvement60 14 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E)Immokalee Rd.Old US 41Further Study Required62A 73 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Ext.16th St.Everglades Blvd.New Two‐Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes)62B 73 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Ext.Everglades Blvd.Big Cypress Pkwy.New Two‐Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes)63 53 Westclox Street Ext.Little League Rd.West of Carson Rd.New Two‐Lane Road6532 Wilson Blvd.Keane Ave. Golden Gate Blvd.New Two‐Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes)66 17 Immokalee Rd. (Intersection)Livingston Rd.Major Intersection Improvement67 57 Veterans Memorial Blvd. Ext.Strand Blvd.I‐75New Four‐Lane Road 68 83 Big Cypress Pkwy. Intersection (new)Oil Well Grade Rd.New At‐Grade Intersection69 N/A Everglades BlvdOil Well Rd / CR 858Immokalee RdWiden from Two to Four Lanes7068 Green Blvd. Ext.Everglades Blvd.Big Cypress Pkwy.New Two‐Lane Road73 20 Immokalee Rd. (CR 846) IntersectionCollier Blvd. (CR 951)Major Intersection Improvement74 28 Immokalee Rd. (CR 846) IntersectionWilson Blvd. Major Intersection Improvement75 55 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new)Veterans Memorial Blvd.New Partial Interchange76 43 Vanderbilt Dr.Immokalee Rd.Woods Edge Pkwy.Widen from Two to Four Lanes 78 29 Golden Gate Pkwy. IntersectionLivingston Rd.Major Intersection Improvement8174 Bridge @ 47th Ave NEWest of Everglades Blvd.New Bridge over Canal82 75 Bridge @ Wilson Blvd.South of 33rd Avenue NENew Bridge over Canal83 69 Bridge @ 18th Ave. NEBetween Wilson Blvd. N and 8th St. NENew Bridge over Canal84 76 Bridge @ 18th Ave NEBetween 8th St. NE and 16th St. NENew Bridge over Canal8564 Bridge @ 13th St. NWNorth Terminus at Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Ext.New Bridge over Canal86 77 Bridge @ 16th St. SESouth TerminusNew Bridge over Canal87 77 Bridge @ Location TBD ‐ Assume 10th Ave. SEEast of Everglades Blvd.New Bridge over Canal88 48 Bridge @Wilson Blvd. SSouth TerminusNew Bridge over Canal89 79 Bridge @ 62nd Ave NEWest of 40th St NENew Bridge over Canal115 N/A Bridge @ 23rd St. SW South of Golden Gate Blvd.New Bridge over Canal90 26 Pine Ridge Rd.Logan Blvd.Collier Blvd.Widen from Four to Six Lanes 92 N/A SR 82Hendry County LineGator Slough Ln.Widen from Two to Four Lanes93 32 Immokalee Rd.Shady Hollow Blvd. ERural Village Rd. (new) Widen from Two Four Lanes94 57 Rural Village Rd. (new)Immokalee Rd.Immokalee Rd.New Four‐Lane Road95 N/A Golden Gate Pkwy. (Intersection)Goodlette‐Frank Rd.Major Intersection Improvement96 N/A Pine Ridge Rd. (Intersection)Airport Pulling Rd.Minor intersection improvements97 N/A Immokalee Rd. (Intersection)Logan Blvd.Major Intersection Improvement98 N/A Vanderbilt Beach Rd. (Intersection)Livingston Rd.Minor intersection improvements99 N/A Vanderbilt Beach Rd. (Intersection)Logan Blvd.Minor intersection improvements100 N/A Collier Blvd. (Intersection)Pine Ridge Rd.Major Intersection Improvement101 N/A Pine Ridge Rd. (Intersection)Goodlette‐Frank Rd.Minor intersection improvements102 N/A US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersectionVanderbilt Beach Rd.Major Intersection Improvement103 N/A US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersectionPine Ridge Rd.Major Intersection Improvement104 N/A US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersectionGolden Gate Pkwy.Major Intersection Improvement107 N/A Golden Gate Pkwy.Collier Blvd.Major Intersection Improvement108 N/A Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Airport Pulling Rd.Intersection Innovation/Improvements109N/A Immokalee Rd.Goodlette‐Frank Rd.Intersection Innovation/Improvements110 N/A Immokalee Rd.Airport Pulling Rd.Intersection Innovation/Improvements111 N/A US 41Immokalee Rd.Intersection Innovation/Improvements112 N/A Airport Pulling Rd.Orange Blossom Dr.Intersection Innovation/Improvements113 N/A Airport Pulling Rd.Golden Gate Pkwy.Intersection Innovation/Improvements114 N/A Airport Pulling Rd.Radio Rd.Intersection Innovation/ImprovementsPAGE 2 OF 210/22/202010.A.2Packet Pg. 1014Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) !!!!FG!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!!!")")")")")")")")")2045 LRTP Needs Assessment Plan±0 2.5 5 MilesEvergladesCityMarcoIslandBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACH!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!")Bridge!!Interchange or FlyoverFGMajor Intersection ImprovementFGMinor Intersection ImprovementNumber of Lanes246OtherExhibit 1 - 2045 Needs Plan ProjectsNaplesNaples8468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETIntersection or InterchangeProject Number*Roadway Project Number*2361B2223242526275723245957667573746878775978772627756625736039761780402935369094534292019213265641415161412555670345434437423876830315150463354481051633350303155945182990403635298017396076108905253581112131841A41B62A62B6791929394*For Map Identification (MAP ID) numbers andproject descriptions, please refer to Table 1 atwww.colliermpo.org/lrtpCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEE10.A.2Packet Pg. 1015Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) !!!!FG!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!!!")")")")")")")")")2045 LRTP Needs Assessment Plan±0 2.5 5 MilesBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACH!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!")Bridge!!Interchange or FlyoverFGMajor Intersection ImprovementFGMinor Intersection ImprovementNumber of Lanes246OtherCollier County Evacuation RoutesExhibit 2 - Evacuation RoutesEvergladesCityMarcoIslandNaplesNaples8468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETIntersection or InterchangeProject Number*Roadway Project Number*2361B2223242526275723245957667573746878775978772627756625736039761780402935369094534292019213265641415161412555670345434437423876830315150463354481051633350303155945182990403635298017396076108905253581112131841A41B62A62B6791929394*For Map Identification (MAP ID) numbers andproject descriptions, please refer to Table 1 atwww.colliermpo.org/lrtpCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEEEvacuation Routes Source:Collier County, October 201910.A.2Packet Pg. 1016Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) !!!!FG!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!!!")")")")")")")")")2045 LRTP Needs Assessment Plan±0 2.5 5 MilesBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACH!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!")Bridge!!Interchange or FlyoverFGMajor Intersection ImprovementFGMinor Intersection ImprovementNumber of Lanes246OtherWetland AreasPicayune Strand State ForestEvergladesNational ParkFakahatcheeStrand PreserveState ParkCorkscrewRegional EcosystemWatershedCorkscrewSwampSanctuaryBig CypressNational PreserveFlorida PantherNational WildlifeRefugeCollier-SeminoleState ParkTen Thousand IslandsNational Wildlife RefugeExhibit 3 - Wetland AreasEvergladesCityMarcoIslandNaplesNaples8468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETIntersection or InterchangeProject Number*Roadway Project Number*2361B2223242526275723245957667573746878775978772627756625736039761780402935369094534292019213265641415161412555670345434437423876830315150463354481051633350303155945182990403635298017396076108905253581112131841A41B62A62B6791929394*For Map Identification (MAP ID) numbers andproject descriptions, please refer to Table 1 atwww.colliermpo.org/lrtpCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEEWetland Areas Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service, May 202010.A.2Packet Pg. 1017Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) !!!!FG!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!!!")")")")")")")")")±0 2.5 5 MilesBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACH!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!")Bridge!!Interchange or FlyoverFGMajor Intersection ImprovementFGMinor Intersection ImprovementNumber of Lanes246OtherConservation AreasPicayune Strand State ForestEvergladesNational ParkFakahatcheeStrand PreserveState ParkCorkscrewRegional EcosystemWatershedCorkscrewSwampSanctuaryBig CypressNational PreserveFlorida PantherNational WildlifeRefugeCollier-SeminoleState ParkTen Thousand IslandsNational Wildlife RefugeExhibit 4 - Conservation Areas2045 LRTP Needs Assessment PlanEvergladesCityMarcoIslandNaplesNaples8468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETIntersection or InterchangeProject Number*Roadway Project Number*2361B2223242526275723245957667573746878775978772627756625736039761780402935369094534292019213265641415161412555670345434437423876830315150463354481051633350303155945182990403635298017396076108905253581112131841A41B62A62B6791929394*For Map Identification (MAP ID) numbers andproject descriptions, please refer to Table 1 atwww.colliermpo.org/lrtpCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEEConservation Areas Source:Florida Natural Areas Inventory, June 202010.A.2Packet Pg. 1018Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) !!!!FG!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!!!")")")")")")")")")±0 2.5 5 MilesBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACH!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!")Bridge!!Interchange or FlyoverFGMajor Intersection ImprovementFGMinor Intersection ImprovementNumber of Lanes246OtherPrimary Panther HabitatSecondary Panther HabitatPicayune Strand State ForestEvergladesNational ParkFakahatcheeStrand PreserveState ParkCorkscrewRegional EcosystemWatershedCorkscrewSwampSanctuaryBig CypressNational PreserveFlorida PantherNational WildlifeRefugeCollier-SeminoleState ParkTen Thousand IslandsNational Wildlife Refuge2045 LRTP Needs Assessment PlanExhibit 5 - Florida Panther HabitatsEvergladesCityMarcoIslandNaplesNaples8468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETIntersection or InterchangeProject Number*Roadway Project Number*2361B2223242526275723245957667573746878775978772627756625736039761780402935369094534292019213265641415161412555670345434437423876830315150463354481051633350303155945182990403635298017396076108905253581112131841A41B62A62B6791929394*For Map Identification (MAP ID) numbers andproject descriptions, please refer to Table 1 atwww.colliermpo.org/lrtpCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEEPanther Habitats Source:US Fish & Wildlife Service10.A.2Packet Pg. 1019Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!FG!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!!!")")")")")")")")")2045 LRTP Needs Assessment Plan±0 2.5 5 MilesBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!")Bridge!!Interchange or FlyoverFGMajor Intersection ImprovementFGMinor Intersection ImprovementNumber of Lanes246OtherEVehicular FatalityEPedestrian FatalityEBicyclist FatalityExhibit 6 - Fatal Crash OccurrencesEvergladesCityMarcoIslandNaplesNaplesFatal Crash Occurrences Source: FDOT State Safety Office, 2014-20188468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETIntersection or InterchangeProject Number*Roadway Project Number*2361B2223242526275723245957667573746878775978772627756625736039761780402935369094534292019213265641415161412555670345434437423876830315150463354481051633350303155945182990403635298017396076108905253581112131841A41B62A62B6791929394*For Map Identification (MAP ID) numbers andproject descriptions, please refer to Table 1 atwww.colliermpo.org/lrtpCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEE10.A.2Packet Pg. 1020Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) !!!!FG!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!!!")")")")")")")")")±0 2.5 5 MilesBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACH!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!Existing FacilitiesProposedProposed Enhanced Facility; ProposedEnhanced Facility - LRTP Capacity Prj;2045 LRTP Needs Assessment PlanExhibit 7 - Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities")Bridge!!Interchange or FlyoverFGMajor Intersection ImprovementFGMinor Intersection ImprovementNumber of Lanes246OtherEvergladesCityMarcoIslandNaplesNaples8468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETIntersection or Interchange Project Number*Roadway Project Number*2361B2223242526275723245957667573746878775978772627756625736039761780402935369094534292019213265641415161412555670345434437423876830315150463354481051633350303155945182990403635298017396076108905253581112131841A41B62A62B6791929394*For Map Identification (MAP ID) numbers andproject descriptions, please refer to Table 1 atwww.colliermpo.org/lrtpCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEEBicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Source:Collier MPO Bike & Ped Master Plan, March 201910.A.2Packet Pg. 1021Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) !!!!FG!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!!!")")")")")")")")")2045 LRTP Needs Assessment Plan±0 2.5 5 MilesBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACH!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!Collier County Trails andPathsFlorida State Park TrailsFlorida Greenways and TrailsSystem - Existing TrailsParadise Coast TrailConceptual Corridor")!!Interchange orFGMajor IntersectionFGMinor IntersectionNumber of Lanes246Exhibit 8 - TrailsEvergladesCityMarcoIslandNaplesNaples8468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETIntersection or Interchange Project Number*Roadway Project Number*2361B2223242526275723245957667573746878775978772627756625736039761780402935369094534292019213265641415161412555670345434437423876830315150463354481051633350303155945182990403635298017396076108905253581112131841A41B62A62B6791929394*For Map Identification (MAP ID) numbers andproject descriptions, please refer to Table 1 atwww.colliermpo.org/lrtpCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEETrails Data Sources:Collier County, October 2018Florida DEP, March 2019Naples Pathways Coalition, June 202010.A.2Packet Pg. 1022Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) 8468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETIntersection or InterchangeProject Number*Roadway Project Number*2361B2223242526275723245957667573746878775978772627756625736039761780402935369094534292019213265641415161412555670345434437423876830315150463354481051633350303155945182990403635298017396076108905253581112131841A41B62A62B6791929394*For Map Identification (MAP ID) numbers andproject descriptions, please refer to Table 1 atwww.colliermpo.org/lrtpCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEESocial and Cultural Facilities Sources:Collier County, December 2019FGDL, August 201610.A.2Packet Pg. 1023Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) 8468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETIntersection or InterchangeProject Number*Roadway Project Number*2361B2223242526275723245957667573746878775978772627756625736039761780402935369094534292019213265641415161412555670345434437423876830315150463354481051633350303155945182990403635298017396076108905253581112131841A41B62A62B6791929394*For Map Identification (MAP ID) numbers andproject descriptions, please refer to Table 1 atwww.colliermpo.org/lrtpCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEELow-Income Areas Source:FGDL/Census 201810.A.2Packet Pg. 1024Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) !!!!FG!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!!!")")")")")")")")")±0 2.5 5 MilesBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACH!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!")Bridge!!Interchange or FlyoverFGMajor Intersection ImprovementFGMinor Intersection ImprovementNumber of Lanes246OtherImmokalee CRABayshore CRA2045 LRTP Needs Assessment PlanExhibit 11 - Community Redevelopment Areas (CRAs)EvergladesCityMarcoIslandNaplesNaples8468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETIntersection or InterchangeProject Number*Roadway Project Number*2361B2223242526275723245957667573746878775978772627756625736039761780402935369094534292019213265641415161412555670345434437423876830315150463354481051633350303155945182990403635298017396076108905253581112131841A41B62A62B6791929394*For Map Identification (MAP ID) numbers andproject descriptions, please refer to Table 1 atwww.colliermpo.org/lrtpCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEECRAs Data SourceCollier County, 202010.A.2Packet Pg. 1025Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) !!!!FG!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!!!")")")")")")")")")±0 2.5 5 MilesBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACH!!!!FG!!FG!!!!FG!!!!FG!!")Bridge!!Interchange or FlyoverFGMajor Intersection ImprovementFGMinor Intersection ImprovementNumber of Lanes246OtherPotential Low-Level Flooding with 1-ft Sea Level RisePotential Flooding with 1-ft Sea Level Rise2045 LRTP Needs Assessment PlanExhibit 12 - Potential Sea Level Rise Flood Risk by 2045EvergladesCityMarcoIslandNaplesNaples8468468588588469495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETIntersection or InterchangeProject Number*Roadway Project Number*2361B2223242526275723245957667573746878775978772627756625736039761780402935369094534292019213265641415161412555670345434437423876830315150463354481051633350303155945182990403635298017396076108905253581112131841A41B62A62B6791929394*For Map Identification (MAP ID) numbers andproject descriptions, please refer to Table 1 atwww.colliermpo.org/lrtpCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEESea Level Rise Data Source:NOAA, September 2018***Sea levels at the highest tide10.A.2Packet Pg. 1026Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) J^J^J^J^J^Draft 2045 LRTP Update±0 2.5 5 MilesEvergladesCityMarcoIslandBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACHJ^S 1st STWestclox STGopher Ridge RDW Main STAirpor t RD N 1st ST J^Livingston RDAirport RD NTamiami TRL NT am iam i T R L EDavis BLVDImmokalee RDPine Ridge RDVanderbilt Beach RDGolden Gate PKWYVanderbilt DROld 41Rattlesnake Hammock RDPiper BLVDProposed Realigned RoutesRoute 11Route 12Route 13Route 14Route 17/18Route 19/28Route 21Route 22Route 23Route 20/26Route 25 EWRoute 25 NSRoute 27 EWRoute 27 NSExhibit 13 - Transit Needs (2020-2045)NaplesNaplesRadio RD_To UF/IFAS andLeHigh Acres_To Fort Myers/FGCU_To Fort Myers/FGCU_To UF/IFAS andLeHigh AcresUnchanged RoutesRoute 15Route 16Route 24Route 121LinC Lee County to Collier CountyBeach Bus - 111th AveProposed New Service RoutesIslandTrolleyUF/IFAS and LeHigh AcresI-75 Premium ExpressBayshore Drive Electric ShuttleDowntown Autonomous CirculatorElectric Naples Pier ShuttleMobility on Demand Service AreaTargeted Service Improvements*• Route 121 - Add one AM and PM trip• Improve frequency on routes 15, 16, 24• Later service (until 10 PM) on routes 24*subject to fundingSEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEE2984684685885884685089084694Data Source:Collier MPO and CAT Ten Year Development Plan (2020)Marco IslandMODNaplesMODNorthNaplesMODGolden Gate EstatesMODHealth DeptCoordinated shared-ride to and fromGovernment Center for access to CAT'sfixed-route systemGolden GateCommunityCenterRadio RoadFacilityGov. CenterGolden Gate EstatesMOD151624121LinCBB15/1615/1615/162424CAT 24 to 6 L's Farm Rd121121121121121121121121121121121LinCLinCLinCLinC2424BB10.A.2Packet Pg. 1027Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Appendix F Draft Collier 2020 System Performance Report 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1028 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan System Performance Report Office of Policy Planning Florida Department of Transportation December 2020 Draft 10-30-20 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1029 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1030 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) December 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 - PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2 - BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 3 3 - HIGHWAY SAFETY MEASURES (PM1) ..................................................................................... 4 4 - PAVEMENT AND BRIDGE CONDITION MEASURES (PM2) ............................................... 9 5 - SYSTEM PERFORMANCE, FREIGHT, AND CONGESTION MITIGATION & AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MEASURES (PM3) ................................................ 13 6 - TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT MEASURES ...................................................................... 17 7 - TRANSIT SAFETY PERFORMANCE ........................................................................................ 20 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1031 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report 2 December 2020 1 - PURPOSE This document provides language that Florida’s metropolitan planning organizations (MPO) may incorporate in Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) System Performance Reports to meet the federal transportation performance management rules. Updates or amendments to the LRTP must incorporate a System Performance Report that addresses these measures and related information no later than: • May 27, 2018 for Highway Safety measures (PM1); • October 1, 2018 for Transit Asset Management measures; • May 20, 2019 for Pavement and Bridge Condition measures (PM2); • May 20, 2019 for System Performance measures (PM3); and • July 20, 2021 for Transit Safety measures. MPOs may incorporate this template language and adapt it as needed as they update their LRTPs. In most sections, there are two options for the text, to be used by MPOs supporting statewide targets or MPOs establishing their own targets. Areas that require MPO input are highlighted in grey. Input will range from simply adding the MPO name and adoption dates to providing MPO-specific information such as descriptions of strategies and processes. The document is consistent with the Transportation Performance Measures Consensus Planning Document developed jointly by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council. This document outlines the minimum roles of FDOT, the MPOs, and the public transportation providers in the MPO planning areas to ensure consistency to the maximum extent practicable in satisfying the transportation performance management requirements promulgated by the United States Department of Transportation in Title 23 Parts 450, 490, 625, and 673 of the Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR). The document is organized as follows: • Section 2 provides a brief background on transportation performance management; • Section 3 covers the Highway Safety measures (PM1); • Section 4 covers the Pavement and Bridge Condition measures (PM2); • Section 5 covers System Performance measures (PM3); • Section 6 covers Transit Asset Management (TAM) measures; and • Section 7 covers Transit Safety measures. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1032 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) December 2020 3 2 - BACKGROUND Pursuant to the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) Act enacted in 2012 and the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) enacted in 2015, state departments of transportation (DOT) and metropolitan planning organizations (MPO) must apply a transportation performance management approach in carrying out their federally required transportation planning and programming activities. The process requires the establishment and use of a coordinated, performance-based approach to transportation decision-making to support national goals for the federal-aid highway and public transportation programs. On May 27, 2016, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) issued the Statewide and Nonmetropolitan Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation Planning Final Rule (The Planning Rule).1 This rule details how state DOTs and MPOs must implement new MAP-21 and FAST Act transportation planning requirements, including the transportation performance management provisions. In accordance with the Planning Rule, the Collier MPO must include a description of the performance measures and targets that apply to the MPO planning area and a System Performance Report as an element of its LRTP. The System Performance Report evaluates the condition and performance of the transportation system with respect to required performance targets, and reports on progress achieved in meeting the targets in comparison with baseline data and previous reports. For MPOs that elect to develop multiple scenarios, the System Performance Report also must include an analysis of how the preferred scenario has improved the performance of the transportation system and how changes in local policies and investments have impacted the costs necessary to achieve the identified targets.2 There are several milestones related to the required content of the System Performance Report: • In any LRTP adopted on or after May 27, 2018, the System Performance Report must reflect Highway Safety (PM1) measures; • In any LRTP adopted on or after October 1, 2018, the System Performance Report must reflect Transit Asset Management measures; • In any LRTP adopted on or after May 20, 2019, the System Performance Report must reflect Pavement and Bridge Condition (PM2) and System Performance (PM3) measures; and • In any LRTP adopted on or after July 20, 2021, the System Performance Report must reflect Transit Safety measures. Per the Planning Rule, the System Performance Report for the Collier MPO is included for the required Highway Safety (PM1), Bridge and Pavement (PM2), System Performance (PM3), Transit Asset Management, and Transit Safety targets (adopted by the MPO Board on September 11, 2020). 1 The Final Rule modified the Code of Federal Regulations at 23 CFR Part 450 and 49 CFR Part 613. 2 Guidance from FHWA/FTA for completing the preferred scenario analysis is expected in the future. As of June 2020, no guidance has been issued. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1033 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report 4 December 2020 3 - HIGHWAY SAFETY MEASURES (PM1) Effective April 14, 2016, the FHWA established five highway safety performance measures 3 to carry out the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). These performance measures are: 1. Number of fatalities; 2. Rate of fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT); 3. Number of serious injuries; 4. Rate of serious injuries per 100 million VMT; and 5. Number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) publishes statewide safety performance targets in the HSIP Annual Report that it transmits to FHWA each year. Current safety targets address calendar year 2020. For the 2020 HSIP annual report, FDOT established statewide at “0” for each performance measure to reflect Florida’s vision of zero deaths. The Collier MPO adopted safety performance targets on November 8, 2019. Table 3.1 indicates the areas in which the MPO is expressly supporting the statewide target developed by FDOT, as well as those areas in which the MPO has adopted a target specific to the MPO planning area. Table 3.1. Highway Safety (PM1) Targets Performance Target Collier MPO agrees to plan and program projects that contribute toward the accomplishment of the FDOT safety target of zero Number of fatalities  Rate of fatalities per 100 million VMT  Number of serious injuries  Rate of serious injuries per 100 million VMT  Number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries.  Statewide system conditions for each safety performance measure are included in Table 3.2, along with system conditions in the Collier MPO metropolitan planning area. System conditions reflect baseline performance (2013-2017). The latest safety conditions will be updated annually on a rolling five-year window and reflected 3 23 CFR Part 490, Subpart B 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1034 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) December 2020 5 within each subsequent system performance report, to track performance over time in relation to baseline conditions and established targets. Table 3.2. Highway Safety (PM1) Conditions and Performance Performance Measures Florida Statewide Baseline Performance (Five-Year Rolling Average) Calendar Year 2020 Florida Performance Targets 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018 Number of Fatalities 2,688.2 2,825.4 2,972.0 0 Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million VMT 1.33 1.36 1.39 0 Number of Serious Injuries 20,844.2 20,929.2 20,738.4 0 Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million VMT 10.36 10.13 9.77 0 Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Non-Motorized Serious Injuries 3,294.4 3,304.2 3,339.6 0 Baseline Conditions After FDOT set its Safety Performance Measures targets in 2018, both FDOT and the Collier MPO established 2017 Baseline Safety Performance Measures. To evaluate baseline Safety Performance Measures, the MPO used the most recent five-year rolling average (2013-2017) of crash data and VMT. Table 3-2 presents the Baseline Safety Performance Measures for Florida and Collier MPO. Table 3.2 – Baseline Safety Performance Measures – 2013-2017 Rolling Five-Year Average Performance Measure Florida Collier MPO Number of Fatalities 2,979.0 36.2 Number of Serious Injuries 20,653.6 186.2 Fatality Rate per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 1.398 1.038 Serious Injury Rate per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 9.732 5.263 Total number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries 3,267.0 39.2 Trends Analysis The process used to develop the MPO’s Long-Range Transportation Plan includes analysis of safety data trends, including the location and factors associated with crashes with emphasis on fatalities and serious 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1035 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report 6 December 2020 injuries. These data are used to help identify regional safety issues and potential safety strategies for the LRTP and TIP. The MPO uses crash data tracking fatalities and serious injuries in Collier County to analyze past trends and identify regional safety issues. Tracking these measures will help to estimate the effectiveness of future MPO transportation investment, as reflected in the TIP. Table 3-3 shows the changes in Safety Performance Measures for Collier MPO from 2009 through 2017. The measures shown in Table 3-3 were calculated by following the same methodology as that used to calculate the baseline conditions. Table 3-3 Safety Performance Measure Trends in Collier County Performance Measure 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 Number of Fatalities 37.2 37.2 38.8 38.0 36.2 Number of Serious Injuries 184.0 174.0 175.2 177.2 186.2 Fatality Rate per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 1.169 1.160 1.184 1.125 1.038 Serious Injury Rate per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 5.790 5.445 5.388 5.252 5.263 Total number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries 37.2 38.6 37.6 40.0 39.2 Coordination with Statewide Safety Plans and Processes The Collier MPO recognizes the importance of linking goals, objectives, and investment priorities to established performance objectives, and that this link is critical to the achievement of national transportation goals and statewide and regional performance targets. As such, the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP reflects the goals, objectives, performance measures, and targets as they are available and described in other state and public transportation plans and processes; specifically the Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), the Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and the Florida Transportation Plan (FTP). 1 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08 1.1 1.12 1.14 1.16 1.18 1.2 35 35.5 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 2009-13 2010-14 2011-15 2012-16 2013-17 5-Yr Annual Rolling Average of Fatalities and Fatality Rates 5-Yr Rolling Average Average Annual Fatality Rates 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1036 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) December 2020 7 • The 2016 Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is the statewide plan focusing on how to accomplish the vision of eliminating fatalities and reducing serious injuries on all public roads. The SHSP was developed in coordination with Florida’s 27 metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) through Florida’s Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC). The SHSP guides FDOT, MPOs, and other safety partners in addressing safety and defines a framework for implementation activities to be carried out throughout the state. • The FDOT HSIP process provides for a continuous and systematic process that identifies and reviews traffic safety issues around the state to identify locations with potential for improvement. The goal of the HSIP process is to reduce the number of crashes, injuries, and fatalities by eliminating certain predominant types of crashes through the implementation of engineering solutions. • Transportation projects are identified and prioritized with the MPOs and non-metropolitan local governments. Data are analyzed for each potential project, using traffic safety data and traffic demand modeling, among other data. The FDOT Project Development and Environment Manual requires the consideration of safety when preparing a proposed project’s purpose and need, and defines several factors related to safety, including crash modification factor and safety performance factor, as part of the analysis of alternatives. MPOs and local governments consider safety data analysis when determining project priorities. LRTP Safety Priorities The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP increases the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non- motorized users as required. The LRTP aligns with the Florida SHSP and the FDOT HSIP with specific strategies to improve safety performance focused on prioritized safety projects, pedestrian and/or bicycle safety enhancements, and traffic operation improvements to address our goal to reduce fatalities and serious injuries. The LRTP identifies safety needs within the metropolitan planning area and provides funding for targeted safety improvements. The Collier MPO has developed a project selection process that incorporates safety in its Project Selection Criteria (reference Collier MPO 2045 LRTP, Chapter 3, Page 3-7, Goal #6). The 2045 LRTP includes a goal to increase the safety of the transportation system for all users, presented as follows. Goal #6: Increase the Safety of the Transportation System for Users: Safety of the transportation system is an important factor in the MPO's planning and project development process. The investment of projects that enhance safety will lead to reduced crashes and lower crash severity for all modes of transportation. Objectives: • Reduce the number of fatalities, injuries, and crashes • Ensure adequate bicycle and pedestrian facilities are incorporated into new highway and transit projects • Implement safety-related improvements on high crash corridors Project Evaluation Criteria: • Enhances safety of transportation system users • Improves facility or intersection identified as having a high crash occurrence or a fatality • Promotes traffic calming • Reduces vehicular conflicts with bicyclists, pedestrians, and other vulnerable road users 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1037 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report 8 December 2020 The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP will provide information from the FDOT HSIP annual reports to track the progress made toward the statewide safety performance targets. The MPO will document the progress on any safety performance targets established by the MPO for its planning area. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1038 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) December 2020 9 4 - PAVEMENT AND BRIDGE CONDITION MEASURES (PM2) Pavement and Bridge Condition Performance Measures and Targets Overview In January 2017, USDOT published the Pavement and Bridge Condition Performance Measures Final Rule, which is also referred to as the PM2 rule. This rule establishes the following six performance measures: 1. Percent of Interstate pavements in good condition; 2. Percent of Interstate pavements in poor condition; 3. Percent of non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS) pavements in good condition; 4. Percent of non-Interstate NHS pavements in poor condition; 5. Percent of NHS bridges (by deck area) classified as in good condition; and 6. Percent of NHS bridges (by deck area) classified as in poor condition. The four pavement condition measures represent the percentage of lane-miles on the Interstate and non- Interstate NHS that are in good condition or poor condition. The PM2 rule defines NHS pavement types as asphalt, jointed concrete, or continuous concrete. Five metrics are used to assess pavement condition: • International Roughness Index (IRI) - an indicator of roughness; applicable to asphalt, jointed concrete, and continuous concrete pavements; • Cracking percent - percentage of the pavement surface exhibiting cracking; applicable to asphalt, jointed concrete, and continuous concrete pavements; • Rutting - extent of surface depressions; applicable to asphalt pavements only; • Faulting - vertical misalignment of pavement joints; applicable to jointed concrete pavements only; and • Present Serviceability Rating (PSR) – a quality rating applicable only to NHS roads with posted speed limits of less than 40 miles per hour (e.g., toll plazas, border crossings). States may choose to collect and report PSR for applicable segments as an alternative to the other four metrics. For each pavement metric, a threshold is used to establish good, fair, or poor condition. Using these metrics and thresholds, pavement condition is assessed for each 0.1 mile section of the through travel lanes of mainline highways on the Interstate or the non-Interstate NHS. Asphalt pavement is assessed using the IRI, cracking, and rutting metrics, while jointed concrete is assessed using IRI, cracking, and faulting. For these two pavement types, a pavement section is rated good if the rating for all three metrics are good, and poor if the ratings for two or more metrics are poor. Continuous concrete pavement is assessed using the IRI and cracking metrics. For this pavement type, a pavement section is rated good if both metrics are rated good, and poor if both metrics are rated poor. If a state collects and reports PSR for any applicable segments, those segments are rated according to the PSR scale. For all three pavement types, sections that are not good or poor are rated fair. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1039 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report 10 December 2020 The good/poor measures are expressed as a percentage and are determined by summing the total lane-miles of good or poor highway segments and dividing by the total lane-miles of all highway segments on the applicable system. Pavement in good condition suggests that no major investment is needed and should be considered for preservation treatment. Pavement in poor condition suggests major reconstruction investment is needed due to either ride quality or a structural deficiency. The bridge condition measures refer to the percentage of bridges by deck area on the NHS that are in good condition or poor condition. The measures assess the condition of four bridge components: deck, superstructure, substructure, and culverts. Each component has a metric rating threshold to establish good, fair, or poor condition. Each bridge on the NHS is evaluated using these ratings. If the lowest rating of the four metrics is greater than or equal to seven, the structure is classified as good. If the lowest rating is less than or equal to four, the structure is classified as poor. If the lowest rating is five or six, it is classified as fair. The bridge measures are expressed as the percent of NHS bridges in good or poor condition. The percent is determined by summing the total deck area of good or poor NHS bridges and dividing by the total deck area of the bridges carrying the NHS. Deck area is computed using structure length and either deck width or approach roadway width. A bridge in good condition suggests that no major investment is needed. A bridge in poor condition is safe to drive on; however, it is nearing a point where substantial reconstruction or replacement is needed. Federal rules require state DOTs and MPOs to coordinate when setting pavement and bridge condition performance targets and monitor progress towards achieving the targets. States must establish: • Four-year statewide targets for the percent of Interstate pavements in good and poor condition; • Two-year and four-year targets for the percent of non-Interstate NHS pavements in good and poor condition; and • Two-year and four-year targets for the percent of NHS bridges (by deck area) in good and poor condition. MPOs must establish four-year targets for all six measures. MPOs can either agree to program projects that will support the statewide targets or establish their own quantifiable targets for the MPO’s planning area. The two-year and four-year targets represent pavement and bridge condition at the end of calendar years 2019 and 2021, respectively. Pavement and Bridge Condition Baseline Performance and Established Targets This System Performance Report discusses the condition and performance of the transportation system for each applicable target as well as the progress achieved by the MPO in meeting targets in comparison with system performance recorded in previous reports. Because the federal performance measures are new, performance of the system for each measure has only recently been collected and targets have only recently been established. Accordingly, this Collier MPO Long Range Transportation Plan System Performance Report highlights performance for the 2017 baseline period. FDOT will continue to monitor and report performance on a biennial basis. Future System Performance Reports will discuss progress towards meeting the targets since this initial baseline report. Table 4.1 presents baseline performance for each PM2 measure for the State and for the MPO planning area as well as the two-year and four-year targets established by FDOT for the State. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1040 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) December 2020 11 Table 4.1. Pavement and Bridge Condition (PM2) Performance and Targets Performance Measures Statewide (2017 Baseline) Statewide 2019 Actual Statewide 2-year Target (2019) Statewide 4-year Target (2021) Collier MPO 2017 Baseline Collier MPO 2018 Baseline Collier MPO 2019 Actual Percent of Interstate pavements in good condition 66.0% n/a ≥60% 36.2% 38.1% 69% Percent of Interstate pavements in poor condition 0.1% n/a <5% 0% 0% 0% Percent of non- Interstate NHS pavements in good condition 76.4% ≥40% ≥40% 50.2% 47.1% 39.4% Percent of non- Interstate NHS pavements in poor condition 3.6% <5% <5% 0% 0% 0% Percent of NHS bridges (by deck area) in good condition 67.7% ≥50% ≥50% 83.58% 82.21% xx.x% Percent of NHS bridges (by deck area) in poor condition 1.2% <10% <10% 0% 0% x.x% FDOT established the statewide PM2 targets on May 18, 2018. In determining its approach to establishing performance targets for the federal pavement and bridge condition performance measures, FDOT considered many factors. FDOT is mandated by Florida Statute 334.046 to preserve the state’s pavement and bridges to specific standards. To adhere to the statutory guidelines, FDOT prioritizes funding allocations to ensure the current transportation system is adequately preserved and maintained before funding is allocated for capacity improvements. These statutory guidelines envelope the statewide federal targets that have been established for pavements and bridges. In addition, MAP-21 requires FDOT to develop a Transportation Asset Management Plan (TAMP) for all NHS pavements and bridges within the state. The TAMP must include investment strategies leading to a program of projects that would make progress toward achievement of the state DOT targets for asset condition and performance of the NHS. FDOT’s TAMP was updated to reflect MAP-21 requirements in 2018 and the final TAMP was approved on June 28, 2019. Further, the federal pavement condition measures require a new methodology that is a departure from the methods currently used by FDOT and uses different ratings and pavement segment lengths. For bridge condition, the performance is measured in deck area under the federal measure, while the FDOT programs its bridge repair or replacement work on a bridge by bridge basis. As such, the federal measures are not directly comparable to the methods that are most familiar to FDOT. In consideration of these differences, as well as the unfamiliarity associated with the new required processes, FDOT took a conservative approach when setting its initial pavement and bridge condition targets. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1041 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report 12 December 2020 The Collier MPO agreed to support FDOT’s pavement and bridge condition performance targets on October 12, 2018. By adopting FDOT’s targets, the Collier MPO agrees to plan and program projects that help FDOT achieve these targets. The Collier MPO recognizes the importance of linking goals, objectives, and investment priorities to established performance objectives, and that this link is critical to the achievement of national transportation goals and statewide and regional performance targets. As such, the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP reflects the goals, objectives, performance measures, and targets as they are described in other state and public transportation plans and processes, including the Florida Transportation Plan (FTP) and the Florida Transportation Asset Management Plan. • The FTP is the single overarching statewide plan guiding Florida’s transportation future. It defines the state’s long-range transportation vision, goals, and objectives and establishes the policy framework for the expenditure of state and federal funds flowing through FDOT’s work program. One of the seven goals defined in the FTP is Agile, Resilient, and Quality Infrastructure. • The Florida Transportation Asset Management Plan (TAMP) explains the processes and policies affecting pavement and bridge condition and performance in the state. It presents a strategic and systematic process of operating, maintaining, and improving these assets effectively throughout their life cycle. The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP seeks to address system preservation, identifies infrastructure needs within the metropolitan planning area, and provides funding for targeted improvements. The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP incorporates the planning priority of the Statewide and Metropolitan Planning Factors as shown on Page 3-2 to “emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.” On or before October 1, 2020, FDOT will provide FHWA and the Collier MPO a detailed report of pavement and bridge condition performance covering the period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. FDOT and the Collier MPO also will have the opportunity at that time to revisit the four-year PM2 targets. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1042 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) December 2020 13 5 - SYSTEM PERFORMANCE, FREIGHT, AND CONGESTION MITIGATION & AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MEASURES (PM3) System Performance/Freight/CMAQ Performance Measures and Targets Overview In January 2017, USDOT published the System Performance/Freight/CMAQ Performance Measures Final Rule to establish measures to assess passenger and freight performance on the Interstate and non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS), and traffic congestion and on-road mobile source emissions in areas that do not meet federal National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The rule, which is referred to as the PM3 rule, requires MPOs to set targets for the following six performance measures: National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) 1. Percent of person-miles on the Interstate system that are reliable, also referred to as Level of Travel Time Reliability (LOTTR); 2. Percent of person-miles on the non-Interstate NHS that are reliable (LOTTR); National Highway Freight Program (NHFP) 3. Truck Travel Time Reliability index (TTTR); Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) 4. Annual hours of peak hour excessive delay per capita (PHED); 5. Percent of non-single occupant vehicle travel (Non-SOV); and 6. Cumulative 2-year and 4-year reduction of on-road mobile source emissions (NOx, VOC, CO, PM10, and PM2.5) for CMAQ funded projects. In Florida, only the two LOTTR performance measures and the TTTR performance measure apply. Because all areas in Florida meet current NAAQS, the last three measures listed measures above pertaining to the CMAQ Program do not currently apply in Florida. LOTTR is defined as the ratio of longer travel times (80th percentile) to a normal travel time (50th percentile) over all applicable roads during four time periods (AM peak, Mid-day, PM peak, and weekends) that cover the hours of 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. each day. The LOTTR ratio is calculated for each roadway segment, essentially comparing the segment with itself. Segments with LOTTR ≥ 1.50 during any of the above time periods are considered unreliable. The two LOTTR measures are expressed as the percent of person-miles traveled on the Interstate or non-Interstate NHS system that are reliable. Person-miles consider the number of people traveling in buses, cars, and trucks over these roadway segments. To obtain person miles traveled, the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for each segment are multiplied by the average vehicle occupancy for each type of vehicle on the roadway. To calculate the percent of person miles traveled that are reliable, the sum of the number of reliable person miles traveled is divide by the sum of total person miles traveled. TTTR is defined as the ratio of longer truck travel times (95th percentile) to a normal travel time (50th percentile) over the Interstate during five time periods (AM peak, Mid-day, PM peak, weekend, and overnight) 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1043 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report 14 December 2020 that cover all hours of the day. TTTR is quantified by taking a weighted average of the maximum TTTR from the five time periods for each Interstate segment. The maximum TTTR is weighted by segment length, then the sum of the weighted values is divided by the total Interstate length to calculate the Travel Time Reliability Index. The data used to calculate these PM3 measures are provided by FHWA via the National Performance Management Research Data Set (NPMRDS). This dataset contains travel times, segment lengths, and Annual Average Daily Travel (AADT) for Interstate and non-Interstate NHS roads. The PM3 rule requires state DOTs and MPOs to coordinate when establishing performance targets for these measures and to monitor progress towards achieving the targets. FDOT must establish: • Two-year and four-year statewide targets for percent of person-miles on the Interstate system that are reliable; • Four-year targets for the percent of person-miles on the non-Interstate NHS that are reliable 4; and • Two-year and four-year targets for truck travel time reliability MPOs must establish four-year performance targets for all three measures within 180 days of FDOT establishing statewide targets. MPOs establish targets by either agreeing to program projects that will support the statewide targets or setting quantifiable targets for the MPO’s planning area. The two-year and four-year targets represent system performance at the end of calendar years 2019 and 2021, respectively. PM3 Baseline Performance and Established Targets The System Performance Report discusses the condition and performance of the transportation system for each applicable PM3 target as well as the progress achieved by the MPO in meeting targets in comparison with system performance recorded in previous reports. Because the federal performance measures are new, performance of the system for each measure has only recently been collected and targets have only recently been established. Accordingly, this Collier MPO 2045 LRTP System Performance Report highlights performance for the baseline period, which is 2017. FDOT will continue to monitor and report performance on a biennial basis. Future System Performance Reports will discuss progress towards meeting the targets since this initial baseline report. Table 5.1 presents baseline performance for each PM3 measure for the state and for the MPO planning area as well as the two-year and four-year targets established by FDOT for the state 4 Beginning with the second performance period covering January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2025, two-year targets will be required in addition to four-year targets for the percent of person-miles on the non-Interstate NHS that are reliable measure. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1044 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) December 2020 15 Table 5.1. System Performance and Freight (PM3) - Performance and Targets Performance Measures Statewide (2017 Baseline) Statewide 2019 Actual Statewide 2-year Target (2019) Statewide 4-year Target (2021) Collier MPO 2017 Baseline Collier MPO 2018 Actual Collier MPO 2019 Actual Percent of person- miles on the Interstate system that are reliable 82.2% ≥75.0% ≥70.0% 100% 100% Percent of person- miles on the non- Interstate NHS that are reliable 84.0% n/a ≥50.0% 97% 98% Truck travel time reliability index (TTTR) 1.43 ≤1.75 ≤2.00 1.12 1.15 FDOT established the statewide PM3 targets on May 18, 2018. In setting the statewide targets, FDOT reviewed external and internal factors that may affect reliability, conducted a trend analysis for the performance measures, and developed a sensitivity analysis indicating the level of risk for road segments to become unreliable within the time period for setting targets. One key conclusion from this effort is that there is a lack of availability of extended historical data with which to analyze past trends and a degree of uncertainty about future reliability performance. Accordingly, FDOT took a conservative approach when setting its initial PM3 targets. The Collier MPO agreed to support FDOT’s PM3 targets on October 12, 2018. By adopting FDOT’s targets, the Collier MPO agrees to plan and program projects that help FDOT achieve these targets. The Collier MPO recognizes the importance of linking goals, objectives, and investment priorities to established performance objectives, and that this link is critical to the achievement of national transportation goals and statewide and regional performance targets. As such, the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP reflects the goals, objectives, performance measures, and targets as they are described in other state and public transportation plans and processes, including the Florida Transportation Plan (FTP) and the Florida Freight Mobility and Trade Plan. • The FTP is the single overarching statewide plan guiding Florida’s transportation future. It defines the state’s long-range transportation vision, goals, and objectives and establishes the policy framework for the expenditure of state and federal funds flowing through FDOT’s work program. One of the seven goals of the FTP is Efficient and Reliable Mobility for People and Freight. • The Florida Freight Mobility and Trade Plan presents a comprehensive overview of the conditions of the freight system in the state, identifies key challenges and goals, provides project needs, and identifies funding sources. Truck reliability is specifically called forth in this plan, both as a need as well as a goal. The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP seeks to address system reliability and congestion mitigation through various means, including capacity expansion and operational improvements. The 2045 LRTP incorporates Goal #4: Reduce Roadway Congestion (reference Chapter 3, Page 3-6):“Congestion and accompanying delay poses a serious cost to the residents of Collier County, reducing their access to jobs, education, health care, shopping, 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1045 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report 16 December 2020 recreation, and other activities. The 2045 LRTP emphasizes reducing congestion to help enhance the quality of life for County residents. Objectives: • Reduce the number of deficient roadways (those with a high volume-to-capacity ratio) identified in the 2045 existing plus committed (E+C) network • Reduce travel delay between residential areas and key destinations Project Selection Criteria: • Improves existing deficient facility or improves a new or neighboring facility intended to relieve an existing deficient facility • Improves intersections and roadways with poor levels of service On or before October 1, 2020, FDOT will provide FHWA and the Collier MPO a detailed report of performance for the PM3 measures covering the period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. FDOT and the Collier MPO also will have the opportunity at that time to revisit the four-year PM3 targets. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1046 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) December 2020 17 6 - TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT MEASURES Transit Asset Performance On July 26, 2016, FTA published the final Transit Asset Management rule. This rule applies to all recipients and subrecipients of Federal transit funding that own, operate, or manage public transportation capital assets. The rule defines the term “state of good repair,” requires that public transportation providers develop and implement transit asset management (TAM) plans, and establishes state of good repair standards and performance measures for four asset categories: equipment, rolling stock, infrastructure, and facilities. The rule became effective on October 1, 2018. Table 6.1 below identifies performance measures outlined in the final rule for transit asset management. Table 6.1. FTA TAM Performance Measures Asset Category Performance Measure and Asset Class 1. Equipment Percentage of non-revenue, support-service and maintenance vehicles that have met or exceeded their useful life benchmark 2. Rolling Stock Percentage of revenue vehicles within a particular asset class that have either met or exceeded their useful life benchmark 3. Infrastructure Percentage of track segments with performance restrictions 4. Facilities Percentage of facilities within an asset class rated below condition 3 on the TERM scale For equipment and rolling stock classes, useful life benchmark (ULB) is defined as the expected lifecycle of a capital asset, or the acceptable period of use in service, for a particular transit provider’s operating environment. ULB considers a provider’s unique operating environment such as geography and service frequency. Public transportation agencies are required to establish and report transit asset management targets annually for the following fiscal year. Each public transit provider or its sponsors must share its targets, TAM, and asset condition information with each MPO in which the transit provider’s projects and services are programmed in the MPO’s TIP. MPOs are required to establish initial transit asset management targets within 180 days of the date that public transportation providers establish initial targets. However, MPOs are not required to establish transit asset management targets annually each time the transit provider establishes targets. Instead, subsequent MPO targets must be established when the MPO updates the LRTP. When establishing transit asset management targets, the MPO can either agree to program projects that will support the transit provider targets or establish its own separate regional transit asset management targets for the MPO planning area. In cases where two or more providers operate in an MPO planning area and establish different targets for a given measure, the MPO has the option of coordinating with the providers to establish a single target for the MPO planning area, or establishing a set of targets for the MPO planning area that reflects the differing transit provider targets. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1047 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report 18 December 2020 To the maximum extent practicable, transit providers, states, and MPOs must coordinate with each other in the selection of performance targets. The TAM rule defines two tiers of public transportation providers based on size parameters. Tier I providers are those that operate rail service or more than 100 vehicles in all fixed route modes, or more than 100 vehicles in one non-fixed route mode. Tier II providers are those that are a subrecipient of FTA 5311 funds, or an American Indian Tribe, or have 100 or less vehicles across all fixed route modes, or have 100 vehicles or less in one non-fixed route mode. A Tier I provider must establish its own transit asset management targets, as well as report performance and other data to FTA. A Tier II provider has the option to establish its own targets or to participate in a group plan with other Tier II providers whereby targets are established by a plan sponsor, typically a state DOT, for the entire group. A total of 20 transit providers participated in the FDOT Group TAM Plan and continue to coordinate with FDOT on establishing and reporting group targets to FTA through the National Transit Database (NTD) (Table 6.2). The participants in the FDOT Group TAM Plan are comprised of the Section 5311 Rural Program and open-door Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities FDOT subrecipients. The Group TAM Plan was adopted in October 2018 and covers fiscal years 2018-2019 through 2021-2022. Updated targets were submitted to NTD in 2019. Table 6.2. Florida Group TAM Plan Participants District Participating Transit Providers 1 Good Wheels, Inc Central Florida Regional Planning Council DeSoto County Transportation 2 Suwannee Valley Transit Big Bend Transit Baker County Transit Nassau County Transit Ride Solutions Levy County Transit Suwannee River Economic Council 3 Tri-County Community Council Big Bend Transit Gulf County ARC Calhoun Transit Liberty County Transit JTRANS Wakulla Transit 4 No participating providers 5 Sumter Transit Marion Transit 6 Key West Transit 7 No participating providers Collier Area Transit (CAT), a Tier II provider, is the only transit provider within the MPO region. CAT does not participate in the FDOT Group TAM Plan as it has too few busses to meet the criteria. On November 9, 2018, the Collier MPO agreed to support the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) / Collier Area Transit (CAT) transit asset management targets which were adopted on October 23, 2018, thus agreeing to plan and program projects in the TIP that once implemented, are anticipated to make progress toward achieving the transit provider targets. Table 6.3 displays the TAM performance measures targets for CAT and the current conditions within the Collier MPO. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1048 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) December 2020 19 The transit asset management targets are based on the condition of existing transit assets and planned investments in equipment, rolling stock, infrastructure, and facilities. The targets reflect the most recent data available on the number, age, and condition of transit assets, and expectations and capital investment plans for improving these assets. Table 6.3 summarizes both existing conditions for the most recent year available, and the targets. Table 6.3. FTA TAM Targets for Collier Area Transit (CAT) Asset Category FDOT and MPO Transit Targets Current Conditions within Collier MPO Met or Exceed Target Equipment 10% have met or exceeded their Useful Like Benchmark (ULB) 0% exceed ULB Yes Rolling Stock 10% have met or exceeded their ULB 50% exceed ULB No Infrastructure n/a n/a n/a Facilities 25% of facilities less than 3.0 on the TERM scale 0% at or above 3.0 TERM Yes TAM Performance The Collier MPO recognizes the importance of linking goals, objectives, and investment priorities to stated performance objectives, and that establishing this link is critical to the achievement of national transportation goals and statewide and regional performance targets. As such, the LRTP directly reflects the goals, objectives, performance measures, and targets as they are described in other public transportation plans and processes, including the System-wide Transit Needs Assessment, which builds upon the Collier County FY 2020 Transit Development Plan (TDP) Major Update, the Collier 2040 LRTP, and the 2013 Collier Area Transit Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA), public input, regional model ridership projections and transit market assessments. To support progress towards TAM performance targets, transit investment and maintenance funding in the 2045 LRTP Transit Cost Feasible Plan totals approximately $377.8 million(reference Table 5-1, Page 5-3), approximately 24 percent of total LRTP funding. and 100% percent of requested CAT funding for transit preservation. Improving the State of Good Repair (SGR) of capital assets is an overarching goal of this process. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1049 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report 20 December 2020 7 - TRANSIT SAFETY PERFORMANCE The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) published a final Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTSAP) rule and related performance measures as authorized by Section 20021 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP– 21). The PTASP rule requires operators of public transportation systems that receive federal financial assistance under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 to develop and implement a PTASP based on a safety management systems approach. Development and implementation of PTSAPs is anticipated to help ensure that public transportation systems are safe nationwide. The rule applies to all operators of public transportation that are a recipient or sub-recipient of FTA Urbanized Area Formula Grant Program funds under 49 U.S.C. Section 5307, or that operate a rail transit system that is subject to FTA’s State Safety Oversight Program. The rule does not apply to certain modes of transit service that are subject to the safety jurisdiction of another Federal agency, including passenger ferry operations that are regulated by the United States Coast Guard, and commuter rail operations that are regulated by the Federal Railroad Administration. Transit Safety Performance Measures The transit agency sets targets in the PTASP based on the safety performance measures established in the National Public Transportation Safety Plan (NPTSP). The required transit safety performance measures are: 1. Total number of reportable fatalities. 2. Rate of reportable fatalities per total vehicle revenue miles by mode. 3. Total number of reportable injuries. 4. Rate of reportable injuries per total vehicle revenue miles by mode. 5. Total number of reportable safety events. 6. Rate of reportable events per total vehicle revenue miles by mode. 7. System reliability - Mean distance between major mechanical failures by mode. CAT has established safety performance targets based on the safety performance measures reported under the National PTASP. The safety performance targets were adopted by the Collier County BCC on May 12, 2020 and the Collier MPO Board on September 11, 2020. Table 7.1 summarizes the PTASP targets and the five years of past performance between 2015 and 2019. These measures will be evaluated periodically to determine when action must be taken to address inadequate safety performance. A bi-annual meeting will take place between FDOT, Collier MPO, and CAT to review and discuss the safety activities that impact performance targets. The safety performance target review will include discussion about whether the targets are being met and if not, what steps will be required to better meet the established targets. An evaluation of the targets will also consider whether the targets are realistic and attainable. If the targets are determined to not be attainable, recommendations for medication or replacement of the target will be considered. On or around June 30th of each year, CAT will transmit the safety performance targets to FDOT and Collier MPO. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1050 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) December 2020 21 Table 7.1 Collier MPO Annual Transit Safety Performance Targets Source: Collier Area Transit September 2020 In Florida, each Section 5307 and 5311 transit provider must develop a System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) under Chapter 14-90, Florida Administrative Code. FDOT technical guidance recommends that Florida’s transit agencies revise their existing SSPPs to be compliant with the new FTA PTASP requirements. Transit Provider Coordination with States and MPOs Key considerations for MPOs and transit agencies: • Transit operators are required to review, update, and certify their PTASP annually. • A transit agency must make its safety performance targets available to states and MPOs to aid in the planning process, along with its safety plans. • To the maximum extent practicable, a transit agency must coordinate with states and MPOs in the selection of state and MPO safety performance targets. • MPOs are required to establish initial transit safety targets within 180 days of the date that public transportation providers establish initial targets. MPOs are not required to establish transit safety targets annually each time the transit provider establishes targets. Instead, subsequent MPO targets must be established when the MPO updates the TIP or LRTP. When establishing transit safety targets, the MPO can either agree to program projects that will support the transit provider targets or establish its own regional transit targets for the MPO planning area. In cases where two or more providers operate in an MPO planning area and establish different targets for a given measure, the MPO has the option of coordinating with the providers to establish a single target for the MPO planning area, or establishing a set of targets for the MPO planning area that reflects the differing transit provider targets. • MPOs and states must reference those targets in their long-range transportation plans. States and MPOs must each describe the anticipated effect of their respective transportation improvement programs toward achieving their targets. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1051 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report 22 December 2020 Over the course of 2020-2021, the Collier MPO will coordinate with public transportation providers in the planning area on the development and establishment of transit safety targets. LRTP amendments or updates after July 20, 2021 will include the required details about transit safety performance data and targets. 10.A.2 Packet Pg. 1052 Attachment: 11/3/20 Draft Appendices (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)) MPO Board Meeting LRTP Update November 13, 2020 10.A.3 Packet Pg. 1053 Attachment: PPT Presentation on Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Agenda Draft LRTP Chapters 1-7 overview Updates Since Draft Chapters 1-6 Pending Changes Schedule Next Steps 2 10.A.3 Packet Pg. 1054 Attachment: PPT Presentation on Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 2045 LRTP Draft 2045 LRTP Draft –October 16, 2020 1 3 4 5 6 72 3 NEW 10.A.3 Packet Pg. 1055 Attachment: PPT Presentation on Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 2045 Draft LRTP Recent Updates •New Chapter 7 –Implementation •Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) (Chapter 6) •Congestion management priorities •CAT Bus and Maintenance Building (Chapter 6) •CAT Bus and Maintenance Building (FTA Grant) •Draft TIP FY 2020/21 -FY 2024/25 amendment •Transit 2045 Cost Feasible Plan •USACE Collier County Coastal Storm Risk Management Feasibility Study (Chapter 4) •FDOT Implementation of Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAV) methodology (Chapter 4) 4 10.A.3 Packet Pg. 1056 Attachment: PPT Presentation on Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 •M-CORES (Chapter 7, page 7-7) •I-75 Southwest Connect PD&E Study (Chapter 7, page 7-9 ) •Appendices including FHWA and FDOT Checklists 2045 Draft LRTP Recent Updates 5 10.A.3 Packet Pg. 1057 Attachment: PPT Presentation on Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 2045 Draft LRTP –Expected Changes •Park -and-Ride Study •Final Transit Development Plan •Ongoing Stakeholder and Public Outreach •Seminole Tribe of Florida •Miccosukee Tribe •Freight •WikiMap comments •Online comments •Technical Reports and Memos •Cost Feasible Plan Revisions 6 10.A.3 Packet Pg. 1058 Attachment: PPT Presentation on Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 DRAFT 11/2/2020 #69 on Needs List; Partially funded for further study #11 Funded PP4 #36 Funded PP4 #39 Funded PP3 #55 Partially Funded CST #60 Funded PP3 #65 Funded PP4 #90 Funded PP3 #97 Funded PP4 7 #30 Further Study required 10.A.3 Packet Pg. 1059 Attachment: PPT Presentation on Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 2045 LRTP CFP Changes -Transit Improvement FY 2020–2025 (TDP)FY 2026–2030 (TDP)FY 2031–2045 (LRTP) Route Network Modifications Route 11 -Extend into Walmart Shopping Ctr Route 12 -Extend into Walmart Shopping Ctr Route 17/18 -Combine/Realign Route 19/28 -Combine/Realign Route 20/26 -Combine Route 21 –Realign to create Marco Express Route 22 –Realign, Route 23 -Realign Golden Gate Pkwy -Split Route 25 creating EW Route Maintenance of existing and new fixed routes and paratransit Increase Frequency Route 23 -60 to 40-min headway Route 24 -85 to 60-min headway Maintenance of existing and new fixed routes and paratransit Maintenance of existing and new fixed routes and paratransit Service Expansion Route 121 -add one AM and one PM trip Route 11, Route 13, Route 14, Route 17/18 -Extended hours to 10 pm Maintenance of existing and new fixed routes and paratransit Other Improvements Santa Barbara Corridor Study UF/IFAS and Leigh Acres Route Study I-75 Managed Lanes Express Study Bus Replacements, Bus Shelters Everglades City Vanpool Study Fares Study Mobility on Demand Study Safety/Security Program and Driver Protection Barriers Technology Investments Safety/Security Program Bus Replacements Bus Shelters Bus Replacements Bus Shelters Technology Investments 8 10.A.3 Packet Pg. 1060 Attachment: PPT Presentation on Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 2045 LRTP Pending Changes –SU Box Funds •Safety and Transit Asset Management Plan updates •Use of SU Box Funds •Bicycle and Pedestrian = $40.45M •Congestion Management = $40.45M •Bridges = $19.70M •Planning =$3.40M •Safety = $3.10M •Airports www.colliermpo.org/lrtp $40.45 $40.45 $19.70 $3.40 $3.10 SU Box Funds Allocation Bicycle and Pedestrian Congestion ManagementBridges Planning Safety Planning Period 2 in LRTP 2026-2030 Planning Period 3 in LRTP 2031-2035 Planning Period 4 in LRTP 2036-2045 Total Costs 2026-2045PEROWCSTPEROWCSTPRE-ENG ROW CST NEW MPO Supplemental Planning Funds $0.70 $0.80 $1.90 $3.40 SU NEW Bicycle Pedestrian Box Funds $10.17 $10.13 $20.15 $40.45 SU/TALU NEW Congestion Management/Intelligent Transportation Box Funds $10.17 $10.13 $20.15 $40.45 SU NEW Bridge Box Funds $4.96 $4.94 $9.80 $19.70 SU NEW Safety $0.80 $0.80 $1.50 $3.10 SU 9 10.A.3 Packet Pg. 1061 Attachment: PPT Presentation on Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Overall LRTP Revenue Forecast for 2026-2045 •Highway = $1.609B •Federal = $107.1M •State = $540.7M •County = $541.5M •Local Operations and Maintenance = $420.2M •Transit = $465.3M •Transit Operations = $334.9M •Transit Capital = $130.4M •FDOT SIS Funding = $337.4M •Use of SU Box Funds = $107.1M •MPO Planning Funds (SU) = $3.40M •Bicycle & Pedestrian (SU/TALU) = $40.45M •Congestion Management (SU) = $40.45M •Bridges (SU) = $19.70M •Safety (SU) = $3.10M •Airports TOTAL REVENUE FORECAST $2.518 B 10 10.A.3 Packet Pg. 1062 Attachment: PPT Presentation on Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 LRTP Schedule MPO Board, Committees & Public Meeting MPO Board & Committees MPO Board & Committees MPO Board & Committees MPO Board, Committees & Public Meeting 11 MPO BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 11, 2020 FINAL LRTP APPROVAL 10.A.3 Packet Pg. 1063 Attachment: PPT Presentation on Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Next Steps in the LRTP Process Expanding Advisory Committee Reviews to include LCB, BPAC, CMC in addition to TAC and CAC Present Draft LRTP to Board on November 13th Final Plan Adoption December 11th , 2020 12 10.A.3 Packet Pg. 1064 Attachment: PPT Presentation on Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 Contact Information Visit us at https://www.colliermpo.org/lrtp/ or scan the QR code with your smart phone to access our website. Anne McLaughlin Brandy Otero MPO Director Principal Planner 2885 S. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-5884 (239) 252-5859 colliermpo@colliergov.net 10.A.3 Packet Pg. 1065 Attachment: PPT Presentation on Draft 2045 LRTP (14179 : Presentation on Draft 2045 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan OBJECTIVE: For the Board to receive a presentation on the Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan. CONSIDERATIONS: The Everglades City Council adopted its first Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (Attachment 1) on October 6, 2020. Members of the Everglades City Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee will give a brief presentation on the Everglades City Plan at the Board meeting. The MPO’s 2019 Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan states on p5: “The City is developing its own Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan which, when adopted, will be included in this Plan by reference.” Thus, the Everglades City Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan is automatically included in the MPO’s BPMP by reference, and no formal action is required on the part of the MPO Board. Similar language is in place for the Cities of Naples and Marco Island.) Nevertheless, in a show of support, the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee voted to endorse including the Everglades City Bike/Ped Master Plan in the MPO’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan by reference. The Everglades City Bike/Ped Master Plan is shown in Attachment 1. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board receives a presentation on the Everglades City Bike/Ped Master Plan. Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (PDF) 10.B Packet Pg. 1066 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 10.B Doc ID: 14180 Item Summary: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 2:36 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 2:36 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:18 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:20 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 10.B Packet Pg. 1067 INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS & BIKE LANES LOCAL/REGIONAL CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY BENEFITS/SUPPORT SUMMARY City of Everglades Mayor Howie Grimm City Clerk Dottie Joiner City Council Elaine Middelstaedt Parker Oglesby Tony Pernas Tim Smith Vicky Wells Bike/Pedestrian Committee Patty Huff, Collier MPO Bike/Ped Advisory Committee Dayna Fendrick, Urban Green Studio Kathy Brock, Publisher Mullet Rapper Tim Brock, Brock Risk Assessment & Value Eng. Tara Saathoff-Wells, Research Asst. Prof. Penn State University. Carol Ogilvie, Land Use Consultant 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1068 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) 1 INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND History of Everglades City The town of Everglade was settled in the late 1800s by early pioneers who fished and farmed the area. They also traded goods with the Seminoles who lived throughout south Florida. When Barron Gift Collier arrived by boat in 1921 to examine the citrus farm at nearby Deep Lake, he immediately saw the potential of this “undiscovered” part of Florida and purchased the town from the Storter family in 1922 and the town of Everglade (“s” was added later) was founded in 1923 as the first county seat for Collier County. Barron Collier immediately started laying out a plan for developing his new town as the center of commercial activity for the construction of the last section of the Tamiami Trail between Naples and Miami. The county courthouse was built in the center of town with businesses lining West Broadway with the first bank in the county just two blocks away and across from the famed Rod & Gun Club where guests enjoyed dinners prepared by a Bavarian chef. Homes and office buildings were built for the growing population and there were laundry services, a post office, administration building, a hospital, a grocery, barbershop, drugstore, the Manhattan Mercantile department store, a machine shop, a sawmill, boatyard, recreation hall, bowling alley, church and school. Collier brought in a battery-powered streetcar and founded the Tamiami Trailways to provide bus transportation to Naples and Ft. Myers. There was a movie house and beautiful landscaping throughout town. The benefits and amenities of a company town were apparent. 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1069 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) 2 Demographic Background Everglades City is a true small town, with a population consisting of both permanent local residents- many of whom are fifth and sixth generation – and seasonal residents who come here for the environment, and the low-key, authentic character of the place. Both the population and the economy are seasonal in nature, with the stone crab season running from October 15 through May 1, and many of the winter residents arriving in November and departing after Easter. ▪ Local population: 426 ▪ Median Age: 51 ▪ Median HH Income $61,000 (includes Retirees) ▪ Average Income Males $34,000 ▪ Average Income Females $22,000 ▪ Visitors Annually: Between 1 and 1.3 Million ▪ Cost of living: 50% of population from $1000 to $1900 / month for housing ▪ Median Housing Cost: $1083/month ▪ Total Housing Units: 476 ▪ Seasonal Units 293 ▪ Owner Occupied 137 ▪ Hotel Rooms: 96 plus an additional 20 recently completed at the Ivey House Economic Conditions The main economic drivers of Everglades City are: ▪ Ecotourism – kayaking, hiking, biking, airboats, swamp buggies ▪ Stone Crabbing ▪ Sport Fishing & Guides ▪ Heritage tourism ▪ State and National Parks visitation ▪ Restaurants/Accommodations/Services for all of the above Everglades Area Communities While this Bike/Ped Master Plan is primarily focused on facilities within the Everglades City jurisdictional limits, we are also considering connections to local neighboring communities such as Plantation Island, Chokoloskee, Copeland, Jerome and Ochopee. These communities are considered part of the “Everglades Area” and are economically connected to Everglades City. The children attend the Everglades City School, and many families have extended relations throughout the Everglades Area. 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1070 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) 3 Existing Roadways and Drainage Sea level rise and resiliency planning are a major topic of concern for Everglades City. The City was originally built in a low-lying area and was created by dredging and filling from the (now named) Barron River to raise the elevation. The town generally lies an average of 1 foot above sea level. During Hurricane Irma in September 2017, the entire town was submerged 4-5’, which caused widespread damage from which the community is still recovering. Existing roadways were built at lower elevations, and frequently flood during big storm events or king high tides. The storm drainage system was also impacted by Irma and drainage pipes were plugged with mud. The City has currently solicited bids for removing the mud from the storm drainage pipes. Bike/Ped improvements are linked to the roadways and drainage conditions; upgrades are often required to construct the sidewalks/bike lanes. Florida Trail Town Program Florida’s Office of Greenways & Trails of the Department of Environmental Protection established a Trail Town Program in 2018 and designated Everglades City in January 2019. Everglades City is surrounded by seven national and state parks and the area offers many outdoor sport activities, including fishing, kayaking, canoeing, bird watching, photography, hiking and biking. Everglades City is the gateway to the Ten Thousand Islands and an important hub for several paddling trails, including the Florida Circumnavigational Saltwater Paddling Trail. It is a place where trail users can venture off a hiking, biking, or paddling trail to enjoy the services and unique heritage of the community, benefiting the town economically and socially. The town is also bike-friendly as evidenced by bicycle racks and rentals in town and at the airport. Everglades City School The Everglades City School is the only public K-12 school in the state. ▪ Number of students: 170 ▪ Percentage of students riding buses: 44% ▪ Percentage of students dropped off: 41% ▪ Percentage of students walk/bike/golf cart: 10% ▪ Percentage of students driving own car: 5% 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1071 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS Everglades City was built in the traditional town manner, with blocks laid out on a grid and the circle in the middle of town anchored by important civic buildings. This layout provides the basis for a walk-able community, and with low traffic volumes and low speeds (15, 25 and 35 mph), it is already a pedestrian and bike- friendly area and short distances to public places in the central part of town. Safety is the number one concern for our mobility and with the thousands of tourists who visit our national and state parks every year, it is vital that the City (which is the hub of our parks with its many amenities) provide the necessary infrastructure to ensure the safety of our residents and visitors. Since being designated a Florida Trail Town in January of 2019, Everglades City has made great strides in making improvements to appeal to trail users of all types, including developing maps for the area, installing bike racks at restaurants and public facilities around town and installing a bike repair station in McLeod Park. The sidewalks and bike lanes envisioned in this Master Plan will greatly enhance the safety, comfort and usability of our city streets to create a welcoming and enjoyable experience for our visitors, children and local residents. NEEDS ASSESSMENT A Bike/Pedestrian Committee was established in 2019, to assess the needs and set priorities for projects in the City. The primary goals are to create a local Bike/Ped network, and offer residents and visitors safe and accessible places to walk, bike, hike and jog. Since Everglades City’s central area is conducive for visitors and residents to walk or bike, it is important to upgrade the roads and sidewalks in this area with appropriate bike/ped facilities The Bike/Ped Committee met several times and made observations on the facilities needed. The intent was to conduct a survey to identify the potential users and types of facilities they would be comfortable utilizing, however COVID prevented that this year. In lieu of a formal survey, the Committee used their collective local knowledge to identify the different types and nature of walkers/riders/paddlers. 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1072 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) 5 ▪ Local permanent residents – for exercise, to get to work, to run errands – some casual, some serious ▪ Seasonal residents – Walkers, bike riders, mostly casual riders, many from RV Parks, to access local destinations, run errands, exercise ▪ ENP – local bike tours, day-trippers ▪ Regular long-distance bike tour groups - 72 hrs to Key West, Ends of Earth Cycling, etc. ▪ Individual cross-state bike riders that stop in ▪ Day-trip excursions on bike – from Marco, Port of the Islands to have lunch ▪ Historic walking tours, Museum events ▪ Multi-activity tourists – people who want to kayak, bike, hike, fish, bird-watch ▪ School kids- more facilities would encourage kids to walk or ride bike to school CURRENT SIDEWALKS & BIKE LANES PHASE 1: Copeland Avenue North Bike Lanes and Collier Avenue Sidewalk. Completed in 2006, these two projects were the last known improvements funded by the MPO. For purposes of reference, we have designated these two projects as PHASE 1 of the Bike/Ped Master Plan. ▪ Copeland Avenue North Bike Lanes The edges of the roadway were striped as bike lanes on both east and west sides of Copeland Ave, beginning at Begonia St and continuing south to the Circle/Broadway Ave, City Hall and McLeod Park. This area of town is primarily residential and Copeland Avenue with its wide median was the original main artery into Everglades City when built by Barron Collier in the 1920s. ▪ Collier Avenue Sidewalk A six-foot wide sidewalk was built on the west side, connecting from Begonia Street to Broadway Avenue, ending in front of City Hall. This sidewalk provides a connection from the north commercial area to the center of town. There is a one-block gap at the beginning of the sidewalk, between Begonia Street and the Everglades Isle RV Resort. Plantation Parkway Paved Shoulder A paved / striped shoulder exists on the south side of Plantation Parkway, which connects from Copeland Avenue South to the 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1073 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) 6 “bend” on Plantation Parkway. Being a constricted causeway surrounded by mangroves, there is not room to add a paved shoulder on the north side. Chokoloskee Causeway Pathway This separated pathway connects from the southern City limits, across the newly completed Chokoloskee Bridge to the entry to Chokoloskee, ending in front of Outdoor Resorts. The pathway is approximately 5 feet in width, but varies due to grass encroachment. It is heavily used by both permanent and seasonal residents and multiple types of users, including walkers, runners, casual cyclists and people fishing or kayaking off the sides of the causeway. Currently, the restricted width does not allow for 2-way multi-use traffic to pass comfortably. PROPOSED SIDEWALKS & BIKE LANES PHASE 2 PROGRAMMED SIDEWALK: Copeland Avenue South This sidewalk is programmed along the east side of Copeland Avenue South as FDOT project #437096-1. The sidewalk is to replace the existing asphalt sidewalk which is in very poor and deteriorated condition. The project is currently under design and is scheduled for construction in FY 2022. This sidewalk will connect from the Circle south to the City limits, terminating approximately in front of the Diving Pelican Restaurant (formerly the Oyster House). PHASE 3 MPO /FDOT APPLICATION 2019: Broadway Ave, Hibiscus Ave, Copeland Ave South Phase 3 of the Everglades City Bicycle / Pedestrian Master Plan (Exhibits A and F) will connect businesses and public places in central downtown Everglades City and provide a non-motorized connection to Everglades Airpark and the Everglades National Park. These bike lanes and sidewalks will provide a safe connection to the central businesses, City Hall, McLeod Park, the Public Dock on the Barron River, the Everglades Community Church, and the Museum of the Everglades which currently conducts guided Walking Tours on Broadway Avenue and Hibiscus Street; sidewalks will provide safety for visitors to this county Museum. ▪ Broadway Avenue Bike Lanes - Reduce 4 vehicular lanes to 2 lanes and convert the outer lane to a buffered bike lane, from Collier Ave (CR 29) to Riverside Dr. Sidewalks - Add sidewalks from the Circle to Riverside Dr (north and south sides). The sidewalk would also continue from the existing sidewalk in front of City Hall, around the Circle where it would 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1074 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) 7 connect to the Phase 2 Project #437096-1 on Copeland Ave South (CR29). Crosswalk striping around the Circle to connect the various segments. ▪ Hibiscus Avenue Bike Lanes - Stripe the edges with bike lanes (existing pavement is extra wide for 2 lanes) from Collier Ave (CR 29) to Broadway Ave. Sidewalks - Add sidewalks around McLeod Park, starting from the current sidewalk in front of City Hall, going north on Copeland Ave to Hibiscus St, then west, (south side only) to N. Storter Ave, then south to West Broadway. An alternate route for the sidewalk on Broadway Ave in case of conflict at the Bank building would cross N. Storter Ave and continue on the north side of Hibiscus to West Broadway Ave. ▪ Copeland Avenue South (CR29) Bike Lanes - Reduce 4 vehicular lanes to 2 lanes and convert the outer lane to a buffered bike lane, from Broadway Ave connecting south to the Everglades Airpark and the Everglades National Park Gulf Coast Visitor Center, terminating at the City limits. These bike lanes will tie into the existing paved shoulders which continue across the Chokoloskee Causeway. 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1075 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) 8 At the time of the Phase 3 Application submittal, discussions were ongoing between Everglades City and Collier County regarding the maintenance responsibility of CR 29 through town. It was determined that Collier County is responsible for the maintenance of the roadway. The County has since scheduled re-surfacing and re-striping work for the roadway, which could coincide with the improvements for the Copeland Ave South (CR 29) portion of the application. Thus, the bike lanes may be implemented through Collier County Maintenance rather than through MPO funding. In addition, the same cross-section proposed for Copeland Ave South could be extended north on Collier Avenue (CR29), from Broadway to Camellia Street, where the current 4-lane starts. ▪ Collier Avenue (CR 29) Possible extension of the same cross-section to reduce 4 lanes to 2 lanes with a buffered bike lane from Broadway Ave north to Camellia Street, by Collier County Maintenance. 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1076 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) 9 PHASE 4 – NORTH COMMERCIAL AREA Future plans will evaluate the needs of connecting establishments (restaurants, hotels, RV parks, churches and Post Office) in the north end of town where visitors and residents currently walk and bike on the major roads. This phase will also consider Datura Street (from CR29/Collier Avenue to the Everglades City School) which was requested on a previous MPO application. This phase should also include closing the gap of the sidewalk between the Everglades Isle RV Resort and Begonia Street. Informal overflow parking typically occurs on the edges of Begonia St and Camellia St. in front of the restaurants and will have to be considered in selecting the appropriate bike/ped facilities for this area. The roadways in this area are prone to flooding after a heavy rain or high tide, and the drainage issues will need to be solved in order for bike/ped improvements to be accomplished. Many potholes and eroded areas emerge after water stands for a few days. Bike/ped facilities should be planned as part of the road reconstruction process. The gap in the sidewalk along Collier Avenue will be addressed as part of this Phase of work. 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1077 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) 10 PHASE 5 – CHOKOLOSKEE CAUSEWAY LINEAR PARK This project will propose an upgrade of the current separated pathway along Copeland Avenue connecting Everglades City to Chokoloskee. Recommendations include widening of the current pathway and provide a linear park with shelters, picnic tables, benches, shade trees and landscaping to allow a more enjoyable experience for cyclists and pedestrians who often travel between the two communities. Since the new bridge was completed in 2018, it provides much better bike and pedestrian facilities, and it would be beneficial to provide additional amenities for the many people and families who fish at the bridge. The Causeway Linear Park will provide an important connection to the historical assets, restaurants and paddling trail access points on Chokoloskee. It is a family -friendly length at 2.5 miles and offers great water views across Chokoloskee Bay. 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1078 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) 11 LOCAL/REGIONAL CONNECTIONS Everglades City is one of the few remaining coastal towns in Florida that continues to offer Old Florida charm. Ideally located as the “hub” of seven national and state parks and preserves, Everglades City offers the amenities that visitors and residents seek as they enjoy our natural environment and take advantage of the many recreational activities. Naples and Marco Island are 25-30 miles to the west and the outskirts of Miami are 60 miles to the east, all connected by the Tamiami Trail which is the southernmost road for long-distance cyclists biking to the Florida Keys from the west coast; there are several organized charity rides along this corridor each year. In addition, SR 29 is becoming the preferred route for long-distance cyclists to continue north to avoid the urban traffic of Naples. The sidewalks and bike lanes envisioned in this Master Plan will enhance the appeal of Everglades City as an eco-tourist destination as well as a bike-friendly place to stay and explore. An intriguing opportunity exists in the form of the old Railroad right-of-way which connects from Everglades City to Copeland/Fakahatchee Strand. A potential Rails-to-Trails could be developed on the old r.o.w. The property is currently under private ownership, so it would take a great deal of coordination with a willing partner to accomplish. This trail connection would provide a safer, more enjoyable route to the Fakahatchee Strand. The existing paved shoulders on SR 29 provide access for cyclists who are comfortable riding on the road, but the trail would be more pleasant for families and casual riders 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1079 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) 12 COMMUNITY BENEFITS / SUPPORT A well-developed system of sidewalks and bike paths will provide additional economic benefits to our local businesses and will complement the historical and cultural assets of the community. ▪ Museum – The Museum of the Everglades is one of the most successful museums in Collier County (total of 5 throughout the county). It attracts over 25,000 visitors a year, including people from all over the world. ▪ Visitor Center – On February 1, 2020, a new Visitor Center located in Everglades City was opened to the public with over 100 guests attending the ribbon cutting ceremony. Unfortunately, it was forced to close due to the coronavirus later in the year but is expected to re-open as soon as it is safe to receive the public. ▪ Historic structures/ Heritage tourism/ walking tours – Visitors to Everglades City are captivated by the history and historical structures throughout the City. The Museum offers guided walking tours around town. Bicycle tours are also provided during the year. ▪ Eco-tourism of all types – The primary draw to Everglades City and its surrounding area is eco-tourism (paddling/hiking) and fishing. Millions of visitors come each year to see the wildlife and the Everglades and enjoy the serenity it provides. ▪ McLeod Park, heart of town activities – McLeod Park is the center of activity for the Everglades community with its new children’s playground, tennis courts, basketball courts, picnic tables, visitor information map, dolphin bike rack, and a bike repair station. ▪ Bike racks distributed to various businesses around town – After Everglades City was designated by the State as a Florida Trail Town, bike racks were purchased and made available to all restaurants, motels, and other public places. ▪ Benefit to restaurants/lodging – Everglades City, Chokoloskee and Ochopee provide a wide selection of restaurants and lodging (www.visitevergladescity.com). Providing more sidewalks and safe bicycling around town and the community will benefit all businesses, especially restaurants and lodging facilities. ▪ Try to capture more overnight stays than day trippers on the bus – An opportunity exists to entice people to stay longer in the Everglades City area. Transit services would be beneficial to the parks and Everglades City. ▪ We are ideally located to provide support services to explore the nearby Parks – Everglades City and the area offer all the amenities to those visiting the surrounding state and national parks/preserves. 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1080 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) 13 SUMMARY This Bike/Pedestrian Master Plan is meant to lay out a vision for improvements that will serve our residents and visitors in a way that provides a comfortable, safe and memorable experience, as well as create economic benefits to the local businesses and community. EXHIBITS Bike/Ped Master Plan graphic (Exhibit A) Phase 3 Photo sheets and Diagram (Exhibit F) 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1081 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1082 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) EVERGLADES CITY PHASE 3 BIKE/PED PROJECT PHOTOS EXHIBIT F Broadway Avenue, Hibiscus Street and Copeland Avenue South August 2019 Sidewalks Alternate route Bike Lanes POTENTIAL CONFLICT AREAS BROADWAY AVE - NORTH LANE LOOKING WEST View from near Circle Open area along McLeod Park allows sufficient room for sidewalk Striped-off bike lane POTENTIAL CONFLICT AT BANK BUILDING Drainage structure, existing sidewalk at lower grade, ramp at building may conflict w/ sidewalk Provide alternate route or alternate construction method (boardwalk, etc) Striped-off bike lane 20190714 20190714 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1083 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) BROADWAY AVE - SOUTH LANE LOOKING WEST POTENTIAL CONFLICT AT SUSIE’S RESTAURANT WALL Remove approx. 15’ of wall that encroaches into r.o.w. to allow for sidewalk Striped off bike lane Open area along vacant lot and the former Glades Bldg allows room for sidewalk Striped-off bike lane Old sidewalk exists along vacant lot – may be historic in nature; may remain or be replaced Striped off bike lane 20190714 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1084 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) HIBISCUS STREET LOOKING WEST View from near Collier Ave (CR 29) Striped-off bike lane each side View from intersection at Copeland Ave North Sidewalk proposed on south side only along McLeod Park Striped-off bike lane each side View from intersection of Hibiscus & N. Storter Alternate route for sidewalk around Bank bldg. in case of conflict along Broadway Sidewalk along west edge of McLeod Park on N. Storter Striped-off bike lanes on Hibiscus 20190714 20190714 20190714 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1085 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) COPELAND AVENUE SOUTH (CR 29) LOOKING SOUTH View from near Circle Striped-off bike lane each side Some reconstruction of edges may be required due to depressions, pot- holes, etc. Near Everglades National Park entry Striped-off bike lane each side Will reduce vehicular travel lanes to 2 lane divided (one lane each side) South end of project at City limits - tie into existing bike lanes that continue onto the Chokoloskee Causeway Striped-off bike lane each side 20190714 20190714 20190714 10.B.1 Packet Pg. 1086 Attachment: Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan (14180 : Everglades City Bike / Pedestrian Master Plan) 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Administrative Modifications to FY2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) OBJECTIVE: For the Board to receive a copy of administrative modifications made to the FY2021- 2025 TIP. CONSIDERATIONS: The combined pages shown in Attachment 1 include revisions to the amount of ROW funding for project 4258432 (I-75 at SR 951) made on 10/28/20 and an adjustment to the transit planning funding (FTA Section 5305d) to match the amount shown in the Unified Planning Work Program, made on 10/29/20. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board receive a copy of the administrative modifications made to FY2021-2025 TIP. Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. 10/28/20 and 10/29/20 administrative modifications to the FY2021-2025 TIP (PDF) 11.A Packet Pg. 1087 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 11.A Doc ID: 14177 Item Summary: Administrative Modifications to FY2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 2:18 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 2:18 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/04/2020 2:37 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:25 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 11.A Packet Pg. 1088 Action TIP Administrative Modification for MPO Executive Director Approval for FY 2020/21 through FY 2024/25 TIP FPN Project Name Description & Limits Requested Fund Phasefu Revise Amount ROW FY funding 4258432 I-75 (SR 93) at SR 951 NIA FDOT STED ROW 2020/21 Responsible Agency: FDOT TIP Reference Page: 68B LRTP Reference Page: CFP Table 6-1 p 6-3 ii" \, COLLIER METROPOLIT A PLA ING ORGANIZATION Approved By: __ /_ (J _________ _ Anne McL)U-lgltl-i , IvtPO "Executive Director .:...._____- Amount 11,361,157 11.A.1 Packet Pg. 1089 Attachment: 10/28/20 and 10/29/20 administrative modifications to the FY2021-2025 TIP (14177 : Collier MPO TIP FY2021‐20254258432I‐75 (SR 93) AT SR 951SISPrior Years Cost:14,114,575Project Description:Ultimate interchange improvement. Future Years Cost:N/AWork Summary:INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTTotal Project Cost: 122,763,089LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:0.651Phase Fund 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 TotalENV DDR 0 0 50,000 100,000 0150,000ROW STED 11,361,157000011,361,157RRUDI 00004,226,0004,226,000RRULF 00001,100,0001,100,000PE DDR 0 0 870,392 0 0870,392DSB ACNP000067,871,22067,871,220DSBLF 0000138,875138,875DSBDI 000022,880,00022,880,000DSBDIH 00005,7205,720DSB DSB2 0 0 0 45,150 045,150Total 11,361,157 0 920,392 145,150 96,221,815 108,648,514CFP Table 6‐1 p 6‐3Adopted June 12,2020Administrative Modification Oct 28, 2020 68B11.A.1Packet Pg. 1090Attachment: 10/28/20 and 10/29/20 administrative modifications to the FY2021-2025 TIP (14177 : 11.A.1Packet Pg. 1091Attachment: 10/28/20 and 10/29/20 administrative modifications to the FY2021-2025 TIP (14177 : Collier MPO FY2021 - FY2025 TIP4101131COLLIER COUNTY MPO TRANSIT PLANNING FTA SECTION 5305 (D)Project Description:FTA Section 5305 Metropolitan PlanningPrior Years Cost:N/AFuture Years Cost:N/ATotal Project Cost:N/AWork Summary:MODAL SYSTEMS PLANNINGLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MPOLength:N/APhase Fund 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 TotalPLNDPTO128,028 9,877 9,877 9,877 11,410 169,069PLNState TBD16,003 79,010 79,010 79,010 91,283 344,316PLNLF16,004 9,877 9,877 9,877 11,410 57,0450000Total160,035 98,764 98,764 98,764 114,103 570,430TRANSIT CFP P6-34Adopted June 12, 2020Administrative Modification 10/29/2020141B11.A.1Packet Pg. 1092Attachment: 10/28/20 and 10/29/20 administrative modifications to the FY2021-2025 TIP (14177 : 11/13/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2021 MPO Calendar OBJECTIVE: For the Board to receive a copy of the 2021 MPO Calendar CONSIDERATIONS: The 2021 MPO Calendar is being distributed to advisory committees and the Board in November and December 2020 (See Attachment 1.) Subsequent changes will be noted and distributed on an as-needed basis. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: For the Board to receive a copy of the 2021 MPO Calendar. Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Principal Planner ATTACHMENT(S) 1. 2021 MPO Calendar (PDF) 11.B Packet Pg. 1093 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 11.B Doc ID: 14181 Item Summary: 2021 MPO Calendar Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/05/2020 1:50 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/05/2020 1:50 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/05/2020 1:58 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/05/2020 2:00 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 11.B Packet Pg. 1094 STRIKETHROUGH = CANCELLED MEETING DATES IN RED = ADDED MEETING Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) – Monthly at 9:00 a.m. All MPO Board Meetings are held on the second Friday of the month. MPO Board Meetings will be held at the Board of County Commissioners Chambers, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, unless otherwise noted. February 12, 2021 March 12, 2021 *April 9, 2021 May 14, 2021 June 11, 2021 September 10, 2021 October 8, 2021 October 15, 2021** November 12, 2021 December 10, 2021 * This is the Collier MPO road-show meeting held at 10:00 a.m. in Immokalee ** This a JOINT MEETING with Lee MPO, location TBD Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) – Monthly at 9:30 a.m. All TAC Meetings are held on the last Monday of the month. TAC Meetings will be held at the Collier Growth Management Department, Planning & Regulation Building Conference Rooms 609/610, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, unless noted below. January 25, 2021 February 22, 2021 March 29, 2021 April 26, 2021 May 24, 2021 August 30, 2021 September 27, 2021 October 25, 2021 ** October XX, 2021 November 29, 2021 ** This a JOINT MEETING with Lee MPO, location TBD Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) – Monthly at 2:00 p.m. All CAC Meetings are held on the last Monday of the month. CAC Meetings will be held at the Collier Growth Management Department Construction and Maintenance Building, Main Conference Room, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, unless noted below. January 25, 2021 February 22, 2021 March 29, 2021 April 26, 2021 May 24, 2021 August 30, 2021 September 27, 2021 October 25, 2021 ** October XX, 2021 November 29, 2021 *This is a JOINT MEETING with Lee CAC, location and date TBD Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) – Monthly at 9:00 a.m. All BPAC Meetings are held on the third Tuesday of the month. BPAC Meetings will be held at the Collier County Growth Management Division, Planning & Regulation Building Conference Rooms 609/610, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, unless noted below. January 19, 2021 February 16, 2021 March 16, 2021 April 20, 2021 May 18, 2021 August 17, 2021 *August XX, 2021 September 21, 2021 October 19, 2021 November 16, 2021 *This is a JOINT MEETING with Lee BPCC, location and date TBD Congestion Management Committee (CMC) – Bi-Monthly at 2:00 p.m. All CMC Meetings are held on the third Wednesday of every other month. CMC Meetings will be held at the Collier County Growth Management Department Main Conference Room, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, unless noted below. January 20, 2021 March 17, 2021 May 19, 2021 July 21, 2021 September 15, 2021 November 17, 2021 Local Coordinating Board (LCB) for the Transportation Disadvantaged – Quarterly at 1:30 p.m. All LCB Meetings are held quarterly on the first Wednesday of the corresponding month. LCB Meetings will be held at the Collier County Government Center Building F, Information Technology Training Room 5th Floor, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, unless noted below. March 3, 2021 May 5, 2021 September 1, 2021 December 1, 2021 2021 Meeting Schedule Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2885 S. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 www.CollierMPO.com (239) 252-5814 DRAFT 11.B.1 Packet Pg. 1095 Attachment: 2021 MPO Calendar (14181 : 2021 MPO Calendar) 11/13/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 13.A Item Summary: Next Meeting Date - December 11, 2020 - 9:00 a.m. Board of County Commissioners Chambers, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 Meeting Date: 11/13/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 11/04/2020 2:51 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 11/04/2020 2:51 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:19 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 11/04/2020 3:21 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 11/13/2020 9:00 AM 13.A Packet Pg. 1096