Loading...
HEX Agenda 11/12/2020 AGENDA THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2020 IN CONFERENCEROOMS 609/610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/PLANNING & REGULATION BUILDING, 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA AS PART OF AN ONGOING INITIATIVE TO PROMOTE SOCIAL DISTANCING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENTS REMOTELY, AS WELL AS IN PERSON, DURING THIS PROCEEDING. INDIVIDUALS WHO WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY, SHOULD REGISTER AT: http://bit.ly/Nov12HEXSpeakerRegistration ANY TIME AFTER THE AGENDA IS POSTED ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE WHICH IS 6 DAYS BEFORE THE MEETING OR THROUGH THE LINK: http://colliercountyfl.iqm2.com/Citizens/default.aspx INDIVIDUALS WHO REGISTER WILL RECEIVE AN EMAIL IN ADVANCE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING DETAILING HOW THEY CAN PARTICIPATE REMOTELY IN THIS MEETING. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING, CALL THOMAS CLARKE AT (239) 252-2526 OR EMAIL TO: Thomas.Clarke@CollierCountyFL.gov. INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER.PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT, PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REVIEW OF AGENDA 3. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. PETITION NO. NUC PL20200000497- 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC) - Request for a change to a non-conforming use pursuant to Land Development Code Sections 9.03.02.D and 10.03.06.V to allow a church to replace a bingo hall that was previously authorized by Resolution 97-339 on 2.11+/- acres within the Estates (E) zoning district located at 6750 Golden Gate Parkway in Section 30, Township 49 South, Range 26 East in Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager] Commissioner District 4 B. PETITION NO. VA PL20190001938 - An after-the-fact variance request from Section 4.02.01.A, Table 2.1, of the Collier County Land Development Code to reduce the minimum side yard setback from 30 feet to 6.6 feet on the southern property line for an accessory shed structure containing utilities for a single-family dwelling in the Estates (E) zoning district located at 1035 31st Street SW in Section 13, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Commissioner District 5 C. PETITION NO. VA-PL20190002701 – CitySwitch II-A, LLC request two variances from LDC Section 5.05.09(G)(7)(b), to reduce the eastern boundary setback of 125 feet to 60.5 feet and from the western boundary setback of 125 feet to 82.2 feet for a proposed 250 foot communications tower on a parcel in the east ½ of the northwest ¼ of the southwest ¼ of the northeast ¼ of the northwest ¼ of Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Principal Planner] Commission District 5 D. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20200001265 – Addison Commercial Corner, LLC requests an insubstantial change to the Addies Corner MPUD, Ordinance No. 11-08, for a sign deviation from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.4. to allow a maximum of two (2) wall signs for end units within shopping centers and multiple-occupancy parcels , or single occupancy parcels where there is double frontage on a public right-of-way, to allow Parcel 1 two (2) additional wall signs for a total of four (4) wall signs, and Parcel 3 one (1) additional wall sign for a total of three (3) wall signs. This deviation only applies to Tract A of the MPUD as shown on Exhibit C-1.The subject property consists of 4.44 acres, in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Principal Planner] Commissioner District 3 E. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20190000194 - Chick-Fil-A GLL Selection II Florida, LP requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 07-32, the Pine Air Lakes Planned Unit Development, to reduce the northern landscape buffer of 7.5 ft to a varying width of 4 inches, to 7.5 ft and a reduction in the southern landscape buffer of 10 ft to a varying width of 7-10 ft, and to add new deviations relating to the buffer. The subject property is located at the northwestern corner of Airport Rd. N and Hollywood Dr. in Section 11, Township 49, Range 25, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: James Sabo, Principal Planner) Commissioner District 2 4. OTHER BUSINESS – 2021 Hearing Examiner Meeting Schedule 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6. ADJOURN Collier County Hearing Examiner Page 1 Printed 11/4/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner AGENDA Growth Management Department Conference Rooms 609/610 2800 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 November 12, 2020 9: 00 AM Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP Hearing Examiner Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes unless otherwise waived by the Hearing Examiner. Persons Wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the hearing report packets must have that material submitted to County staff at Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov 10 days prior to the Hearing. All materials used during presentation at the hearing will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner are final unless appealed to the Board of County Commissioners. Hearing Procedures will provide for presentation by the Applicant, presentation by staff, public comment and applicant rebuttal. The Hearing Examiner will render a decision within 30 days. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the decision by mail may supply County staff with their name, address, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope for that purpose. Persons wishing to receive an electronic copy of the decision may supply their email address. November 2020 Collier County Hearing Examiner Page 2 Printed 11/4/2020 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Review of Agenda 3. Advertised Public Hearing A. PETITION NO. NUC PL20200000497- 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC) - Request for a change to a non-conforming use pursuant to Land Development Code Sections 9.03.02.D and 10.03.06.V to allow a church to replace a bingo hall that was previously authorized by Resolution 97-339 on 2.11+/- acres within the Estates (E) zoning district located at 6750 Golden Gate Parkway in Section 30, Township 49 South, Range 26 East in Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager] Commissioner District 4 B. PETITION NO. VA PL20190001938 - An after-the-fact variance request from Section 4.02.01.A, Table 2.1, of the Collier County Land Development Code to reduce the minimum side yard setback from 30 feet to 6.6 feet on the southern property line for an accessory shed structure containing utilities for a single-family dwelling in the Estates (E) zoning district located at 1035 31st Street SW in Section 13, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Commissioner District 5 C. PETITION NO. VA-PL20190002701 – CitySwitch II-A, LLC request two variances from LDC Section 5.05.09(G)(7)(b), to reduce the eastern boundary setback of 125 feet to 60.5 feet and from the western boundary setback of 125 feet to 82.2 feet for a proposed 250 foot communications tower on a parcel in the east ½ of the northwest ¼ of the southwest ¼ of the northeast ¼ of the northwest ¼ of Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Principal Planner] Commission District 5 D. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20200001265 – Addison Commercial Corner, LLC requests an insubstantial change to the Addies Corner MPUD, Ordinance No. 11-08, for a sign deviation from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.4. to allow a maximum of two (2) wall signs for end units within shopping centers and multiple-occupancy parcels , or single occupancy parcels where there is double frontage on a public right-of-way, to allow Parcel 1 two (2) additional wall signs for a total of four (4) wall signs, and Parcel 3 one (1) additional wall sign for a total of three (3) wall signs. This deviation only applies to Tract A of the MPUD as shown on Exhibit C-1.The subject property consists of 4.44 acres, in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Principal Planner] Commissioner District 3 E. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20190000194 - Chick-Fil-A GLL Selection II Florida, LP requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 07-32, the Pine Air Lakes Planned Unit Development, to reduce the northern landscape buffer of 7.5 ft to a varying width of 4 inches, to 7.5 ft and a reduction in the southern landscape buffer of 10 ft to a varying width of 7-10 ft, and to add new deviations relating to the buffer. The subject property is located at the northwestern corner of Airport Rd. N and Hollywood Dr. in Section 11, Township 49, Range 25, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: James Sabo, Principal Planner) Commissioner District 2 4. Other Business November 2020 Collier County Hearing Examiner Page 3 Printed 11/4/2020 A. Proposed 2021 Hearing Examiner Meeting Schedule 5. Public Comments 6. Adjourn 11/12/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.A Item Summary: PETITION NO. NUC PL20200000497- 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC) - Request for a change to a non-conforming use pursuant to Land Development Code Sections 9.03.02.D and 10.03.06.V to allow a church to replace a bingo hall that was previously authorized by Resolution 97- 339 on 2.11+/- acres within the Estates (E) zoning district located at 6750 Golden Gate Parkway in Section 30, Township 49 South, Range 26 East in Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager] Commissioner District 4 Meeting Date: 11/12/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Laura DeJohn 10/27/2020 11:45 AM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 10/27/2020 11:45 AM Approved By: Review: Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 10/29/2020 3:07 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Rose Burke Review Item Completed 10/29/2020 5:50 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 10/30/2020 1:24 PM Zoning Anita Jenkins Review Item Completed 11/02/2020 10:06 AM Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 11/12/2020 9:00 AM 3.A Packet Pg. 4 NUC-PL20200000497; 6750 Golden Gate Pkwy Bingo Hall Non-conforming Use Change October 27, 2020 Page 1 of 9 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 12, 2020 SUBJECT: NUC-PL20200000497; 6750 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY NON-CONFORMING USE CHANGE ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owner: Agents: Airport Hall for Hire, Inc. D. Wayne Arnold, AICP 6750 Golden Gate Parkway Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Naples, FL 34105 Applicant: El Shaddai of Grace, Inc. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Rich Yovanovich, Esq. 621 Ridge Drive 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 Naples, FL 34103 REQUESTED ACTION: Request for a change to a non-conforming use pursuant to Land Development Code Sections 9.03.02.D and 10.03.06.V to allow a church to replace a bingo hall that was previously authorized by Resolution 97-339 on 2.11+ acres within the Estates (E) zoning district located at 6750 Golden Gate Parkway in Section 30, Township 49 South, Range 26 East in Collier County, Florida. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is 2.11+ acres and located at 6750 Golden Gate Parkway, approximately one- half mile west of the I-75 and Golden Gate Parkway interchange, in Section 30, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) 3.A.a Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: NUC-Staff-Report (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) NUC-PL20200000497; 6750 Golden Gate Pkwy Bingo Hall Non-conforming Use Change October 27, 2020 Page 2 of 9 3.A.aPacket Pg. 6Attachment: NUC-Staff-Report (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) NUC-PL20200000497; 6750 Golden Gate Pkwy Bingo Hall Non-conforming Use Change October 27, 2020 Page 3 of 9 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner seeks a non-conforming use change, per Section 9.03.02.D of the Land Development Code. The subject property was originally developed as a roller-skating rink in 1977, prior to adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. In 1997, the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals authorized a non-conforming use change to permit the skating rink to be converted into a “rental hall for local non-for-profit civic and community associations, with a primary use as a bingo hall,” adopted by Resolution 97-339, subject to five conditions: a. Alcoholic beverages are prohibited on-site. b. Hours of operation shall be limited to: 9:00 A.M. until 11:30 P.M. c. Landscaped buffers shall be provided around the boundary of the subject site in accordance with Division 2.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). Landscaping shall also be provided internally to the greatest extent possible. d. The subject building, signage and lighting shall be brought into compliance with all applicable provisions of Division 2.5 and Division 2.8 of the LDC. e. The above site improvements shall be required through the Site Development Review process in accordance with Division 3.3 of the LDC, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The petitioner proposes replacing the 612-seat bingo hall use with a religious facility (church), with typical accessory uses, having a maximum capacity of 321 seats. The petitioner proposes no accessory uses such as day care, school, food service, etc. The church is proposed to occupy the existing building with no structural alterations proposed. The site has 138 existing parking spaces which is consistent with the parking requirements for a 321-seat church. A vehicle trip generation report was submitted with the petition indicating reduction in PM peak hour vehicle trips as a result of converting the bingo hall to a religious facility. The Non-conforming Use Site Plan included with the petition demonstrates that existing physical conditions of the site (building footprint, access, parking, buffers, and setbacks) are proposed to remain. 3.A.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: NUC-Staff-Report (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) NUC-PL20200000497; 6750 Golden Gate Pkwy Bingo Hall Non-conforming Use Change October 27, 2020 Page 4 of 9 Non-Conforming Use Site Plan 3.A.a Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: NUC-Staff-Report (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) NUC-PL20200000497; 6750 Golden Gate Pkwy Bingo Hall Non-conforming Use Change October 27, 2020 Page 5 of 9 The Traffic Impact Statement included with the petition demonstrate the trips associated with the existing Bingo Hall (612 seats) and the proposed Church (321 seats). The reduction in anticipated trips is summarized below. Existing Land Use Trips vs. Proposed Land Use Trips Land Use Weekday Daily (ADT) AM Peak Hour (vph) PM Peak Hour (vph) Existing Bingo Hall, 612 Seats 1,958 92 294 Proposed Church, 321 Seats 141 5 10 Net change -1,817 -87 -284 The proposed change from Bingo Hall to Church use results in substantially fewer site-generated trips and supports the proposed non-conforming use change application. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the boundaries of the subject property, which is in the Urban Golden Gate Estates/Mixed Use District/Residential Estates Subdistrict per the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan, and zoned Estates (E) with Corridor Management Overlay and Airport Overlay Districts: North: Golden Gate Parkway, beyond which are +2.2 acre parcels developed with single family homes, zoned Estates with Corridor Management Overlay and Airport Overlay Districts East: Undeveloped +5 acre property, zoned Estates with Corridor Management Overlay and Airport Overlay Districts South: Single family home on +1.6-acre property, zoned Estates with Airport Overlay District West: Undeveloped +2.8 acre property, zoned Estates with Corridor Management Overlay and Airport Overlay Districts, beyond which is 68th Street Southwest Subject Site 3.A.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: NUC-Staff-Report (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) NUC-PL20200000497; 6750 Golden Gate Pkwy Bingo Hall Non-conforming Use Change October 27, 2020 Page 6 of 9 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed this request and finds that the subject site is currently zoned Estates and is developed with an authorized non- conforming use. Land Development Code Section 9.03.02 sets forth the requirements necessary to change nonconforming uses. Any nonconforming use of a structure, or of a structure and premises in combination, may be changed to another nonconforming use that is equally or more appropriate to the district than the existing nonconforming use, and adverse effect on occupants and neighboring properties will not be greater than if the existing nonconforming use is continued. Through the zoning review process, the applicant must demonstrate all requirements have been met and the proposed church use will be equal or less intense than the currently approved bingo hall. Any increase in intensity would require an amendment to the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub- Element and a Conditional Use application. Based on the proposed church having equal or less intensity than the currently approved bingo hall, the petition can be found consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Element: The request is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan, which states, “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applicatio ns, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” The proposed Non-Conforming Use Change on the subject property was reviewed based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) land use designations and information provided by the petitioner. This petition is proposing to change the use on the parcel from a Bingo Hall with +/- 612 seats to a Church with +/- 321 Seats. According to the TIS provided with the petition the new 3.A.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: NUC-Staff-Report (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) NUC-PL20200000497; 6750 Golden Gate Pkwy Bingo Hall Non-conforming Use Change October 27, 2020 Page 7 of 9 Church use will generate (+/-284) fewer PM Peak Hour trips on the adjacent roadway Golden Gate Parkway. Therefore, the proposed use will not cause additional transportation impacts on the adjacent roadways and the request can be found to be consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Planning staff recommends approval of the petition. Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning Section staff reviewed the petition. The subject property does not have a preserve requirement. The proposal is consistent with the with the CCME. STAFF ANALYSIS: When considering a Nonconforming Use Change petition, per LDC Section 9.03.02.D, the Hearing Examiner must make findings that: 1) there are no structural alterations being proposed; and 2) the proposed use must be of the same character, or a more restrictive than the existing nonconforming use; 3) that the proposed use is equally or more appropriate for the district than the existing nonconforming use; 4) that the relation of the structure to surrounding properties is such that adverse effect on occupants and neighboring properties will not be greater than if the existing nonconformity is continued; 5) whether appropriate conditions and safeguards are needed in accordance with the intent and purpose of the LDC. 1. There are no structural alterations being proposed. No structural alterations constituting an intensification of use is being proposed. The addition of a covered drop off area is proposed where an existing canopy is positioned at the building entrance facing Golden Gate Parkway. This covered drop off area provides safety and protection from the elements, and does not constitute any intensification of use, nor does it adversely affect surrounding properties. 2. The proposed use must be of the same character, or a more restrictive than the existing nonconforming use. The TIS associated with the proposed use change illustrates a reduction of traffic generated by the proposed use compared to trip generation rates of the existing bingo hall. The capacity of the church is proposed to be a maximum of 321 seats, while the bingo hall 612 seats, thus the proposed capacity is more restrictive than the existing non-conforming use. Conditions of the existing non conforming use included prohibition of alcoholic beverages; hours limited to between 9:00 AM and 11:30 PM; landscape buffering in accordance with the LDC; and compliance with LDC building, signage and lighting standards. The proposed church will maintain these conditions, except that alcoholic beverages may be used as applicable for religious ceremonial purposes only. The church is proposed to begin operation earlier at 8:00 AM, but nighttime hours are no later than 10:00 PM which renders the hours of operation to be similar, but more restrictive in the nighttime, than the bingo hall. 3.A.a Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: NUC-Staff-Report (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) NUC-PL20200000497; 6750 Golden Gate Pkwy Bingo Hall Non-conforming Use Change October 27, 2020 Page 8 of 9 3. That the proposed use is equally or more appropriate for the district than the existing nonconforming use. The proposed church use will be more appropriate for the surrounding area than the existing bingo hall based upon no physical change to the characteristics of the property, the reduction in capacity, reduction in trip generation, and reduction in nighttime hours of operation from 11:30 PM to 10:00 PM. 4. That the relation of the structure to surrounding properties is such that adverse effect on occupants and neighboring properties will not be greater than if the existing nonconformity is continued. The fewer trips generated by the proposed church use will correlate to less impact upon the surrounding properties. Impacts upon the single residential structure abutting the site to the south are minimized by the orientation of the building entrance and parking lot toward the north, facing Golden Gate Parkway. The reduction in capacity, reduction in trip generation, and reduction in nighttime hours of operation from 11:30 PM to 10:00 PM will have a favorable effect on neighboring properties. 5. Whether appropriate conditions and safeguards are needed in accordance with the intent and purpose of the LDC. The petitioner indicated four conditions for approval, specific to: (1) seating capacity of 321 seats; (2) hours from 8:00 AM to 10:00 PM for weekday and weekend operation (not applicable on religious holidays); (3) no outdoor amplified sound; and (4) maximum trip generation of 294 PM peak hour two way trips. Staff recommends seven additional conditions of approval at the conclusion of the staff report, which are typical matters addressed in the review and approval of church facilities, designed to help ensure compatibility in proximity to surrounding properties and residential uses. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) is not required for Non-conforming Use Change petitions. However, the petitioner held a courtesy NIM, and provided public notice in conformance with Administrative Code procedures. The NIM was held October 26, 2020 at the Parkway Life Church, 5975 Golden Gate Pkwy, Naples, FL 34116. As indicated in the NIM Meeting Summary included in Attachment B, no members of the public attended. In advance of the November 12, 2020 Hearing Examiner hearing, Collier County published notice in the Naples Daily News and notified surrounding property owners by mailing letters on October 23, 2020 to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) approve Petition NUC- PL20200000497, subject to the attached Non-Conforming Use Site Plan and the following conditions: 3.A.a Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: NUC-Staff-Report (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) NUC-PL20200000497; 6750 Golden Gate Pkwy Bingo Hall Non-conforming Use Change October 27, 2020 Page 9 of 9 1. Seating for the religious facility use shall be limited to a maximum of 321 seats, and building square footage shall not exceed the existing 16,000 square feet. 2. Weekday and weekend hours are limited to 8:00 AM to 10:00 PM. Hours for services on religious holidays shall not be subject to the above specified hours. 3. No outdoor amplified sound shall be permitted, unless permitted under a Temporary Use Permit for a special event. 4. The maximum total daily trip generation shall not exceed 294 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of any future application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. 5. Special events (operated by the church) are limited to twelve (12) per calendar year and subject to a Temporary Use Permit as required, in accordance with the LDC. 6. No day care services, school, or food service shall not be offered on site, unless in conjunction with and during a church service or a permitted special event. 7. Leasing of the church facility to outside groups or use by other groups is prohibited. 8. For services or other periods or events of significant traffic generation, as determined by Collier County staff, the church shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider as directed by Collier County staff, with staffing at the location(s) as directed by Collier County Transportation Engineering Division Director or designee. 9. Alcoholic beverages, other than those used for religious ceremonial purposes, are prohibited on-site. 10. Landscape requirements of the LDC will be provided to the greatest extent practical at time of any subsequent development order. 11. Project site light poles, structures and fixtures will be shielded away from residential property lines. Attachments: A. Non-conforming Use Site Plan (2 pages) B. Applicant’s Back up Materials 3.A.a Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: NUC-Staff-Report (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) ZONED: E, ESTATES USE: RESIDENTIALZONED: E, ESTATESUSE: UNDEVELOPEDZONED: E, ESTATES USE: RESIDENTIAL GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY 68TH STREET S.W.EXISTING BUILDING16,000 S.F.10' BUILDING SETBACK 30' BUILDING SETBACK 75'BUILDINGSETBACKEXISTING DUMPSTER LOADING 200' BUILDING SETBACKEXISTING 6' WIDE BUFFER EXISTING 5' WIDE BUFFER COVERED PORCH 0 100'50' SCALE: 1" = 100' GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11" 3.A.b Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: Attachment A - Non-conforming Use Site Plan (2 pages) (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 SITE INFORMATION: ZONING: E, ESTATES (CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT AND AIRPORT OVERLAY) SITE AREA: 2.11 AC. EXISTING USE: BINGO HALL, RENTAL FACILITY PROPOSED USE: CHURCH, RELIGIOUS FACILITY (MAXIMUM 321 SEATS) BUILDING AREA: 16,000 SQUARE FEET BUILDING HEIGHT:30 FEET OPEN SPACE (NOT APPLICABLE): PRESERVE (NOT APPLICABLE): BUILDING SETBACKS (MINIMUM): GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY:200' EASTERN BOUNDARY:30' WESTERN BOUNDARY:10' SOUTHERN BOUNDARY:75' NOTES: 1.ALL ON-SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED AND DIRECTED AWAY FROM ADJOINING PROPERTIES. 2.THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 3.EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION TO REMAIN. 3.A.b Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: Attachment A - Non-conforming Use Site Plan (2 pages) (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com 6750 GG Pkwy NUC (PL20200000497) Application and Supporting Documents November 12, 2020 HEX Meeting 3.A.c Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com July 2, 2020 Ms. Laura DeJohn Collier County Growth Management Division/ Planning and Regulation Land Development Services Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: 6750 Golden Gate Parkway Non-Conforming Use Change (NUC) – PL20200000497, Submittal 1 Dear Ms. DeJohn: An application for Public Hearing for a Non-Conforming Use Change (NUC) is being filed electronically for review. The subject property is 2.11+/- acres in size and is located on the south side of Golden Gate Boulevard east of 68th Street S.W. The applicant is proposing to replace the 612-seat bingo hall use with a religious facility (church), with typical accessory uses, having a maximum capacity of 321 seats. The proposed church would occupy the existing building space with only the need to make minor interior renovations to the building. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover Letter 2. Application for Non-Conforming Use Change 3. Pre-Application Meeting Notes 4. Aerial Photograph 5. Addressing Checklist 6. Affidavit of Authorization 7. Site Plan 8. Project Description 9. Warranty Deed(s) 10. Boundary Survey 11. Traffic Impact Statement 12. Resolution 1997-339 3.A.c Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) Ms. Laura DeJohn RE: 6750 Golden Gate Parkway Non-Conforming Use Change (NUC) – PL20200000497, Submittal 1 July 2, 2020 Page 2 of 2 Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP c: John Hunter Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. GradyMinor File 3.A.c Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 280 NON-CONFORMING USE CHANGE (NUC) PETITION LDC subsection 9.03.02 D & Code of Laws section 2-83 – 2-90 Chapter 6 H. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NO (PL) PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED Pursuant to LDC Section 9.03.02 D- Change in Use, Ordinance 2004-21, allows for a change from one non-conforming use to another stating the following: “If no structural alterations are made, any nonconforming use of a structure, or of a structure and premises in combination may be changed to another nonconforming use of the same character, or to a more restricted nonconforming use, provided the boards of zoning appeals, upon application to the development services director, shall find after public notice and hearing that the proposed use is equally or more appropriate to the district than the existing nonconforming use and that the relation of the structure to surrounding properties will not be greater than if the existing nonconforming use is continued. In permitting such change, the board of zoning appeals may require appropriate conditions and safeguards in accordance with the intent and purpose of this code.” Pursuant to Ordinance 2013-57, the Office of the Hearing Examiner shall hear Nonconforming Use Change requests. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): ___________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ___________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ____________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ________________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: __________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ____________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ To be completed by staff 6/3/2014 Page 1 of 3 El Shaddai of Grace, Inc. 621 Ridge Drive Naples FL 34108 239-597-3464 john.hunter@covenantnaples.com D. Wayne Arnold, AICP / Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. / Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs FL 34134 239-947-1144 warnold@gradyminor.com / ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com 3.A.c Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 280 PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. #: _________________________ Section/Township/Range: / / Subdivision: ____________________________________ Unit: ______ Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________ # of Acres: __________ Address of Subject Property: _____________________________________________________ ZONING INFORMATION Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: ____________________________________ Adjacent Property Information: Zoning Land Use N S E W PROJECT DESCRIPTION Please address the following on separate sheets and attach to the application packet. 1. If the request proposes a number of possible nonconforming uses, list all of the proposed nonconforming uses and identify the following for each use: a. Total number of parking required; b. Hours of operation; and c. Total square footage for the proposed nonconforming building(s) and structure(s). 2. If the request proposed a number of possible permitted and/or accessory uses, list all of the proposed used and identify the following for each use: a. Total square footage of the new or existing structures; b. Total number of parking required; and c. Hours of operation for proposed. 3. Total number of parking spaces existing on site. 6/3/2014 Page 2 of 3 38104960005 30 49 26 Golden Gate Estates 29 TR55 N.A. 2.3+/- 6750 Golden Gate Parkway E (CMO/APO), Bingo Hall E (Corridor Management Overlay/APO) Residential E (APO) Residential E (Corridor Management Overlay/APO) Undeveloped E (Corridor Management Overlay/APO) Undeveloped 3.A.c Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 280 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Non-Conforming Use Change Chapter 6 H. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application 12 Pre-Application meeting notes 1 Aerial Photograph 2 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 Site Plan drawn to scale 12 Narrative statement identifying how the nonconforming use change complies with the standards in LDC subsection 9.03.05 D. 12 Proof of ownership or interest in property, deed or contract to purchase 3 Electronic Copies of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: x Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. x Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. FEE REQUIREMENTS: Non-conforming Use Alteration Petition: $1,500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $500.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 _________________________________ ____________________ Applicant Signature Date __________________________________ Printed Name 6/3/2014 Page 3 of 3 2800 North NaNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNples _______________________________________________________________ Applicant Signature X X X X X X X X X August 7, 2020 D. Wayne Arnold, AICP 3.A.c Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 6750 Golden Gate PKWY (PL20200000497) Proposed Conditions of Approval August 21, 2020 Page 1 of 1 Proposed Conditions of Approval.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com The approval of this conditional use is subject to the following condition(s): 1. Seating for a religious facility use shall be limited to a maximum of 321 seats. 2. Weekday and weekend hours for the religious facility shall be from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. Hours for services on religious holidays shall not be subject to the above specified hours. 3. No outdoor amplified sound shall be permitted. 4. The religious facility use shall be limited to a maximum of 294 p.m. peak hour two-way trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. 3.A.c Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY 68TH STREET S.W.0 100'50' SCALE: 1" = 100' GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11" 3.A.c Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPT ION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 S30 T49 R26 3.A.c Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 38104960005 04/28/2020 3.A.c Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) / $ 775,000 $ 315,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 331,273 $ 599,515 $ 930,788 $ 74,922 $ 855,866 $ 930,788 $ 855,866 Collier County Proper ty AppraiserProperty Summar y Parcel No 38104960005 SiteAddress*Disclaimer 6750GOLDENGATEPKWY Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34105 Name / Address AIRPORT HALL FOR HIRE INC % JUDITH KAPLAN 6750 GOLDEN GATE PKWY City NAPLES State FL Zip 34105-7338 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres  *Estimated 4B30 335200 55 14B30 30 49 26 2.34 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 E 150FT OF TR 55 Millage Area 10 Millage Rates   *Calculations Sub./Condo 335200 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 School Other Total Use Code 34 - BOWLING ALLEYS, SKATING RINKS,POOL HALL 5.083 6.3071 11.3901 Latest Sales Histor y (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 09/25/97 2349-2165 08/01/84 1095-137 08/01/84 1095-135 09/01/76 661-1389  2019 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (-) 10% Cap (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll   3.A.c Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) / Collier County Proper ty AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No 38104960005 SiteAddress*Disclaimer 6750GOLDENGATEPKWY Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34105 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. 3.A.c Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. Airport Hall for Hire, Inc. 100 Joel Kaplan, President Judith Kaplan, President Jonathan Kaplan, Vice President N.A. 3.A.c Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: N.A. N.A. N.A. 3.A.c Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Date of option: _________________________ Date option terminates: __________________, or Anticipated closing date: ________________ AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition’s final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 ____________________________________________ ____________ Agent/Owner Signature Date ____________________________________________ Agent/Owner Name (please print) 2800 North Horseshoe Naples, FLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 34104 _______________________________________________________________________________________ Agent/Owner Signature D. Wayne Arnold, AICP July 2, 2020 3.A.c Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) ZONED: E, ESTATES USE: RESIDENTIALZONED: E, ESTATESUSE: UNDEVELOPEDZONED: E, ESTATES USE: RESIDENTIAL GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY 68TH STREET S.W.EXISTING BUILDING16,000 S.F.10' BUILDING SETBACK 30' BUILDING SETBACK 75'BUILDINGSETBACKEXISTING DUMPSTER LOADING 200' BUILDING SETBACKEXISTING 6' WIDE BUFFER EXISTING 5' WIDE BUFFER COVERED PORCH 0 100'50' SCALE: 1" = 100' GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11" 3.A.c Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 SITE INFORMATION: ZONING: E, ESTATES (CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT AND AIRPORT OVERLAY) SITE AREA: 2.11 AC. EXISTING USE: BINGO HALL, RENTAL FACILITY PROPOSED USE: CHURCH, RELIGIOUS FACILITY (MAXIMUM 321 SEATS) BUILDING AREA: 16,000 SQUARE FEET BUILDING HEIGHT:30 FEET OPEN SPACE (NOT APPLICABLE): PRESERVE (NOT APPLICABLE): BUILDING SETBACKS (MINIMUM): GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY:200' EASTERN BOUNDARY:30' WESTERN BOUNDARY:10' SOUTHERN BOUNDARY:75' NOTES: 1.ALL ON-SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED AND DIRECTED AWAY FROM ADJOINING PROPERTIES. 2.THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 3.EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION TO REMAIN. 3.A.c Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 6750 Golden Gate Pkwy NUC PL20200000497 Conceptual Church Floor Plan 3.A.c Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 6750 Golden Gate Parkway Non-Conforming Use Change (PL20200000497) Project Description August 21, 2020 Page 1 of 3 6750GGP-20 Project Description-r1.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Narrative statement identifying how the nonconforming use change complies with the standards in LDC subsection 9.03.02 D. 9.03.02 - Requirements for Continuation of Nonconformities D. Change in use. If no structural alterations are made, any nonconforming use of a structure, or of a structure and premises in combination may be changed to another nonconforming use of the same character, or to a more restricted nonconforming use, provided the board of zoning appeals, upon application to the County Manager or designee, shall find after public notice and hearing that the proposed use is equally or more appropriate to the district than the existing nonconforming use and that the relation of the structure to surrounding properties is such that adverse effect on occupants and neighboring properties will not be greater than if the existing nonconforming use is continued. In permitting such change, the board of zoning appeals may require appropriate conditions and safeguards in accordance with the intent and purpose of the LDC. The subject property was originally developed as a roller-skating rink in 1977, prior to adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. In 1997, the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals authorized a non-conforming use change (NUC-97-339) to permit the skating rink to be converted into a “rental hall for local non-for-profit civic and community associations, with a primary use as a bingo hall.” Five conditions were approved for the rental hall/bingo hall use: a. Alcoholic beverages are prohibited on-site. b. Hours of operation shall be limited to: 9:00 A.M. until 11:30 P.M. c. Landscaped buffers shall be provided around the boundary of the subject site in accordance with Division 2.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). Landscaping shall also be provided internally to the greatest extent possible. d. The subject building, signage and lighting shall be brought into compliance with all applicable provisions of Division 2.5 and Division 2.8 of the LDC. e. The above site improvements shall be required through the Site Development Review process in accordance with Division 3.3 of the LDC, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The applicant is proposing to replace the 612-seat bingo hall use with a religious facility (church), with typical accessory uses, having a maximum capacity of 321 seats. The proposed church would occupy the existing building space with only the need to make minor interior renovations to the building. The site has 138 existing parking spaces which is consistent with the parking requirements for a 321-seat church. 3.A.c Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) Page 2 of 3 6750GGP-20 Project Description-r1.docx The church is similar in character to the uses previously approved through the nonconforming use process in that the space was approved for congregation of large groups of non-profit community users. The church will be a more restrictive use than the existing facility as it will have many fewer daily users, and hours of operation for the church use would be more restrictive than the existing bingo hall use. No outdoor amplified sound will be permitted. A vehicle trip generation report has been prepared which demonstrates the significant reduction in daily weekday vehicle trips that results from conversion of the bingo hall use to a religious facility. Weekend trips are also reduced by converting the bingo hall use to a religious facility. The religious facility is proposing to establish conditions of approval which will establish a limitation on the maximum sanctuary seating, and hours of operation which have more restrictive operating hours than the existing bingo hall. The applicant offers the following conditions: 1. Seating for a religious facility use shall be limited to a maximum of 321 seats. 2. Weekday and weekend hours for the religious facility shall be from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. Hours for services on religious holidays shall not be subject to the above specified hours. 3. No outdoor amplified sound shall be permitted. 4. The religious facility use shall be limited to a maximum of 294 p.m. peak hour two-way trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. Please address the following on separate sheets and attach to the application packet. 1. If the request proposes a number of possible nonconforming uses, list all of the proposed nonconforming uses and identify the following for each use: a. Total number of parking required; The proposed 321 seat religious facility (church) is proposed to replace the existing 612 seat bingo hall facility. The 321-seat church requires 137 parking spaces (3 spaces per 7 seats). The property has 138 parking spaces on-site. b. Hours of operation; and Hours of operation for the proposed church are anticipated to be similar to other churches in the community. Church office hours will typically be weekdays between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Religious services will occur some weeknights between the hours of 6 p.m. and 10 p.m. and weekends between the hours of 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. 3.A.c Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) Page 3 of 3 6750GGP-20 Project Description-r1.docx c. Total square footage for the proposed nonconforming building(s) and structure(s). The existing building on the property is approximately 16,000 square feet. There are no plans to increase the size of the structure to accommodate the proposed church use. 2. If the request proposed a number of possible permitted and/or accessory uses, list all of the proposed used and identify the following for each use: a. Total square footage of the new or existing structures; The total building square footage is 16,000 square feet, with a maximum of 321 seats. b. Total number of parking required; and Required parking is 137 spaces. c. Hours of operation for proposed. Church office hours will typically be weekdays between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Religious services will occur some weeknights between the hours of 6 p.m. and 10 p.m. and weekends between the hours of 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. Hours may be increased to accommodate religious holiday services. 3. Total number of parking spaces existing on site. 138 parking spaces exist on-site. 3.A.c Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) THE EAST 150' OFTRACT 55 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 29LYING INCOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDABOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:JOB CODE:SCALE:DATE:FILE:SHEET:5 JUNE 20201" = 30'DLSKJG20-80-BS.DWG1 of 1GradyMinorCivil Engineers●Land Surveyors●Planners●Landscape ArchitectsCert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144Fort Myers: 239.690.4380PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 57SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST LEGENDPROPERTY DESCRIPTIONNOTES: This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Donald L. Saintenoy III, P.S.M. on the date adjacent to the seal using a SHA authentication code. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the SHA authentication code must be verified on any electronic copies. Digitally signed by Donald L. Saintenoy III, P.S.M. Date: 2020.06.10 13:14:36 -04'00'3.A.cPacket Pg. 57Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 -         3.A.c Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC))         3.A.c Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC))         3.A.c Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC))         3.A.c Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC))         3.A.c Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC))         3.A.c Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) RESOLUTION NO. 97- 339 RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER NUC-97-1, FOR ANON-CONFORMING USE CHANGE ON PROPERTYHEREINAFTERDESCRIBEDINCOLLIERCOUNTY,FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125,Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations asarenecessaryfortheprotectionofthepublic, and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land DevelopmentCode (Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes regulations for the zoning ofparticulargeographicdivisionsoftheCounty, among which is the grantingofrequestsfornon-conforming use changes, and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearingafternoticeasinsaidregulationsmadeandprovided, and has consideredtheadvisabilityofachangetoarentalhallforlocalnon-for-profitcivicandcommunityassociations, with a primary use as a bingo hall in anE" Estates Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as amatteroffactthatsatisfactoryprovisionandarrangementhavebeenmade concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 1.8.6 of the Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County, and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to beheardbythisBoardinpublicmeetingassembledandtheBoardhavingconsideredallmatterspresented, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ofCollierCounty, Florida,: that The Petition Number NUC-97-1 filed by J. Dudley Goodlette, representing Thomas L. Gregory and Nancy L. Gregory, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: East 150 feet of Tract 55, Golden Gate Estates Unit 29, asrecordedinPlatBook7, Page 57, of the Public Records ofCollierCounty, Florida. 1- 3.A.c Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) be and the same hereby is approved for a rental hall for local non-for- profit civic and community associations, with a primary use as a bingo hall in the "E" Estates Zoning District wherein said property is located subject to the following conditions: a. Alcoholic beverages are prohibited on-site. b. Hours of operation shall be limited to: 9:00 A.M. until11:30 P.M. Landscaped buffers shall be provided around the boundaryofthesubjectsiteinaccordancewithDivision2.4 of theCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode (LDC). Landscapingshallalsobeprovidedinternallytothegreatestextentpossible. d. The subject building, signage and lighting shall be broughtintocompliancewithallapplicableprovisionsofDivision2.5 and Division 2.8 of the LDC. e. The above site improvements shall be required through theSiteDevelopmentReviewprocessinaccordancewithDivision3.3 of the LDC, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Nuraber NUC-97-1 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this ~v~-/~ day of ~,~ ~- , 1997. ATTESTs, ,, JBOARD OF ZONING APPEALSDWI~HT'~'.~'~R~K, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Approved 'a~".~o,.-Dorm and Legal Sufficiency: Marj~rie M. Student Assistant County Attorney f/NUC-97-1 RESOLUTXON/ 3.A.c Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Project Location Map NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PL20200000497, 6750 Golden Gate Parkway Non-Conforming Use Change A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing El Shaddai of Grace, Inc. (Applicant) will be held Monday, October 26, 2020, 5:30 pm at Parkway Life Church, 5975 Golden Gate Pkwy, Naples, FL 34116. Individuals who would like to participate remotely or have questions or comments should contact Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician with Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone: 239-947-1144, or mail: 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. El Shaddai of Grace, Inc. has submitted a formal application to Collier County seeking approval of a Non-Conforming Use Change (NUC). The applicant is proposing to replace the 612-seat bingo hall use with a religious facility (church), with typical accessory uses, having a maximum capacity of 321 seats. The proposed church would occupy the existing building space with only the need to make minor interior and exterior renovations to the building. The site has 138 existing parking spaces which is consistent with the parking requirements for a 321-seat church. The subject property (Parcel ID # 38104960005) is comprised of approximately 2.11± acres, located at 6750 Golden Gate Parkway in Section 30, Township 49 South, Range 26 East in Collier County, Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. 3.A.c Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 1NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 LEGAL1 LEGAL2 LEGAL3 LEGAL4 SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE BLOCKBLDG LOTUNIT FOLIO ADDRESSTYPEABRAHAM, ELIZABETH MARY 9496 CASORIA CT UNIT 201NAPLES, FL 34113---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 105FT OF TR 5830 49 26 58 2 38105240009 UAIRPORT HALL FOR HIRE INC % JUDITH KAPLAN 6750 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105---7338 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 E 150FT OF TR 5530 49 26 55 1 38104960005 UAUSTIN, MARK & CAROL 2831 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7233 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 75FT OF TR 3930 49 26 39 2 38103360004 UBEAL, MICHAEL F & PATRICIA 3191 66TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 105FT OF TR 6330 49 26 63 2 38105680009 UBENDER TR, RONALD G BENDER TR, MICHELE J TR DTD 5-17-91 2660 66TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34105---7310 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 E 180FT OF TR 24 OR 1620 PG 83930 49 26 24 0 38102000006 UBIGLEY JR, WILLIAM P & KIM J 3221 66TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 75FT OF N 180FT OF TR 6230 49 26 62 1 38105520004 UBUONPANE, ANTHONY L RITA FERRARA GRACE T BUONPANE LAWRENCE FERRARA 31 MEYERSVILLE RD GILLETTE, NJ 07933---1200 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 E 75FT OF W 150FT OF TR 66 OR 967 PG 102, 2028-1539 30 49 26 66 1 38106040004 UCADIZ-PAU, LAURA E 2430 VANDERBILT BEACH RD STE 108-174NAPLES, FL 34109---2654 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 105FT OF TR 87 LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR 3347 PG 460 30 49 26 87 3 38108440107 UCARLISLE, GREG % E JAMES KURNIK 711 FIFTH AVE S STE 200 NAPLES, FL 34102---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 180FT OF TR 34 OR 789 PG 94730 49 26 34 1 38103000005 UCASANOLA, YADIRY ERIC TRIGUERO-RODRIGUEZ 2933 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---0 INLAND PROPERTIES ONE LOT 2 & N 10FT OF W 181.32FT OF LOT 1, LESS S 6FT OF E 300FT OF LOT 2 30 49 26 2 52248000043UCENTER POINT COMMUNITY CHURCH OF NAPLES INC 6590 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105---7342 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 TR 85 LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W AS DESC IN OR 3210 PG 742, AND ALL TR 86 LESS THAT PORTION 30 49 26 85 0 38108200004 UDOROTHY JOHNSON REV TRUST EST 1980 COBBLESTONE WAYCLEARWATER, FL 33760---1623 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 E 180FT OF TR 6830 49 26 68 0 38106280000 UDROGUE, JOANNE 3145 66TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7319 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 75FT OF TR 6430 49 26 64 2 38105840001 UDRYDEN, JO ELLEN CARLYLE 3165 66TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7319 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 75FT OF S 180FT TR 6330 49 26 63 0 38105600005 UDRYDEN, JO ELLEN CARLYLE 3165 66TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7319 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 75FT OF THE N 150FT OF TR 6330 49 26 63 3 38105720008 UDUFFY JR TR, JAMES P GLORIA L COOLEY TR UTD 3/20/02 - UTD 3/20/02 2760 68TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34105---7236 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 150FT OF TR 5230 49 26 52 0 38104640008 UELIAS, MENASHE & NICOLE 2847 66TH STREET SWNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 150FT OF TR 6930 49 26 69 0 38106360001 UESPINAR, MARCO A 3211 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 105FT OF TR 32 OR 603 PG 165430 49 26 32 2 38102760003 UEVANS, THEODORE KATHRYN FERRARA LAWRENCE FERRARA 17 HOBART AVE SHORT HILLS, NJ 07078---2026 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 W 75FT OF TR 66 OR 938 PG 1858 AOR 2028 PG 1538 30 49 26 66 2 38106080006 UFAST FORWARD FITNESS LLC 1441 RIDGE STNAPLES, FL 34103---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 TR 36 OR 594 PG 154530 49 26 36 0 38103120008 UFERRARA, KATHRYN E THEODORE EVANS LAWRENCE & KATHRYN E FERRARA STANLEY K EVANS JR 17 HOBART AVE SHORT HILLS, NJ 07078---2026 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 E 150FT OF TR 6530 49 26 65 0 38105920002 UFREY, THOMAS K DAN FREY 8 W LAKE STWACONIA, MN 55387---1006 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 W 75FT OF E 150FT OF TR 6730 49 26 67 3 38106240008 UFREYDAYS DONEGAN PROPERTY LLC 1581 NORTHGATE DRNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 W 105FT OF TR 6730 49 26 67 1 38106160007 UFREYDAYS DONEGAN PROPERTY LLC 1581 NORTHGATE DRNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 E 75FT OF W 180FT OF TR 6730 49 26 67 2 38106200006 UGARVEY, KEVIN MICHAEL BRIDGETTE GARVEY 3110 70TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 180FT OF TR 27 OR 1967 PG 98530 49 26 27 1 38102320003 UHAYES, HUGH D & NANCY R 3190 70TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7212 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 180FT OF TR 28 OR 766 PG 115130 49 26 28 1 38102400004 UHELFERICH, RICHARD L JAMES E HELFERICH WILLIAM G HELFEICH 343 E SALEM ST CLAYTON, OH 45315---8908 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 TR 3530 49 26 35 0 38103080009 UHOGGATT, MICHAEL R MARGARET A HOGGATT 2913 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---0 INLAND PROPERTIES ONE LOT 330 49 26 3 52248000069 UJAEN, ULYSSES NABAL 2890 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7234 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 105FT OF TR 5230 49 26 52 3 38104720009 UKENDALL, WILLIAM C & DONNA M 2891 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7233 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 180FT OF TR 3930 49 26 39 0 38103280003 UKERSEY, EDWARD L 3200 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7226 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 180FT OF TR 59 OR 1062 PG 85130 49 26 59 1 38105320000 UKNAEUPER, ROBERT S 5018 CLUBVIEW CT EBRADENTON, FL 34203---4007 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 105FT OF TR 6930 49 26 69 1 38106400000 UKRAUSS, FREDERICK W & DORA A 3111 66TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7319 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 105FT OF TR 6430 49 26 64 3 38105880003 ULASWICK, WILLIAM & RUTHANN 2953 68TH STREET SWNAPLES, FL 34105---0 INLAND PROPERTIES ONE LOT 1 & S 6FT OF E 300FT OF LOT 2, LESS THE N 10FT OF THE W 181.32FT OF LOT 1 30 49 26 1 52248000027 ULE, VINH QUANG & LILY THUAN 3120 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 75FT OF N 180FT OF TR 57 OR 2047 PG 1201 30 49 26 57 2 38105120006 ULEBRUN, JESSICA & CHRISTOPHER 3130 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7228 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 150FT OF TR 5730 49 26 57 0 38105040005 ULONGO JR, AUGUST P & MARY A R 3150 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7228 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 75FT OF S 180FT OF TR 58 OR 1860 PG 989 30 49 26 58 0 38105160008 UMARTINEZ, ALEJANDRO NAYDA MARIA DE LA ROSA 3201 66TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7321 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 105FT OF TR 6230 49 26 62 0 38105480005 UMC PHILLIPS, RICHARD DENISE MC PHILLIPS 6680 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105---7340 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 W 180FT OF TR 6530 49 26 65 1 38105960004 UMCLEAN, JAMES R 3110 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7228 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 105FT OF TR 5730 49 26 57 1 38105080007 UMETCHEAR, MARIA F 3135 66TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7319 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 75FT OF S 150FT OF TR 64 OR 1973 PG 1022 30 49 26 64 1 38105800009 UMONTY EST, DENNIS R % KELLEY KATHLEEN MONTY PR 2865 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7233 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 75FT OF N 150FT OF TR 39 OR 1624 PG 1403 30 49 26 39 1 38103320002 UMORANTE SR, MANUEL A DANIEL MORANTE 6920 GOLDEN GATE EST NAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 E 105 FT OF TR 2630 49 26 26 0 38102160001 UMORANTE, MANUEL & LAURA M 6920 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---7249 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 W 75FT OF E 180FT OF TR 2630 49 26 26 1 38102200000 UOKUNIEWICZ, JOSEPH B JACQUELINE A OKUNIEWICZ 3220 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 150FT OF TR 59 OR 668 PG 108630 49 26 59 0 38105280001 UOPPENHEIMER, RICHARD FREY KARL LONDON OPPENHEIMER 668 WEBSTER STNEEDHAM, MA 02492---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 E 75FT OF TR 6730 49 26 67 0 38106120005 UPEPPER, JEANNETTE K 3144 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7228 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 150FT OF TR 58 OR 562 PG 77430 49 26 58 1 38105200007 UPEPPER, JOEL & KIMBERLY 3171 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 150FT OF TR 3330 49 26 33 1 38102880006 UPEPPER, JOEL A & KIMBERLY A 3171 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 75FT OF S 180FT OF TR 33 OR 542 PG 593 30 49 26 33 2 38102920005 UPERRY TR, NANCY L JOHNSON DOROTHY JOHNSON REV TRUST EST UTD 6/11/98 1980 COBBLESTONE WAY CLEARWATER, FL 33760---1623 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 373FT TRACT 83 LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W AS DESC IN OR 3210 PG 762 30 49 26 83 1 38108080101 UPETERSON, ANDREA H 3060 66TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7318 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 75FT OF N 180FT OF TR 8730 49 26 87 0 38108360009 URACETRAC PETROLEUM INC RYAN, LLC %SILVER OAK ADVISORS P O BOX 2437 SMYRNA, GA 30081---2437 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 W 150FT OF TR 6830 49 26 68 1 38106320009 URAHMAN, MOHAMMED M & FAHMIDA 13056 VALEWOOD DRNAPLES, FL 34119---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 W 180FT OF TR 53 OR 802 PG 169830 49 26 53 0 38104760001 URAY, RICHARD SIMON FREITAS-RAY 1874 IVORY CANE POINT NAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 150FT OF TR 6230 49 26 62 2 38105560006 URILEY FLORIDA RENTALS LLC 37735 ENTERPRISE CT #200FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48331---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 W 180FT OF TR 3730 49 26 37 0 38103160000 URODKEY, DAVID L & CYNTHIA S 3221 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7225 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 75FT OF N 180FT OF TR 32 OR 1331 PG 1176 30 49 26 32 0 38102680002 URODRIGUEZ, MARIO 4730 10TH ST NENAPLES, FL 34120---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 105FT OF TR 33 OR 618 PG 94030 49 26 33 0 38102840004 UROSE Z SOMOGYI REV LIV TRUST 5061 CASTLEROCK WAYNAPLES, FL 34112---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 W 180FT OF TR 55 OR 1667 PG 171830 49 26 55 0 38104920003 URUMBERGER, WILSON J & CONNIE S 2855 66TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7313 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 75FT OF S 180FT OF TR 69 OR 1415 PG 1490-92 30 49 26 69 2 38106440002 URUTLEDGE, JERRY LEE LINDA B COLLINS 3231 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 75FT OF S 150FT OF TR 3230 49 26 32 3 38102800002 USCHISLER, MARK D 6721 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 E 180FT OF TR 54 OR 1059 PG 46930 49 26 54 1 38104880004 USCHUSTER, LARRY A CONSTANCE J SCHUSTER 27231 IBIS COVE CTBONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---8754 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 E 180FT OF TR 6630 49 26 66 0 38106000002 USHELTON, PHILLIP A & GRETCHEN 3121 66TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7319 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 75FT OF N 180FT OF TR 6430 49 26 64 0 38105760000 USIROIS, ANNE-BRIGITTE 2870 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7234 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 75FT OF S 180FT OF TR 5230 49 26 52 1 38104680000 USMALL BROS L L C 8620 TYLER BLVDMENTOR, OH 44060---4348 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 TR 5630 49 26 56 0 38105000003 UT R & P J BRIGHT 3270 COLLINGTREE CTNAPLES, FL 34105---0 EDGEWATER ACRES TRACT A30 49 26 A 1 30740000026 UTAYLOR, DUANE P & KATHRYN M 6761 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---7337 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 E 150FT OF TR 5330 49 26 53 1 38104800000 UTHOMAS, DANIEL A TINA M STEPHENS 2043 LORRAINE DR SWAIKEN, SC 29801---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 75FT OF S 150FT OF TR 3430 49 26 34 0 38102960007 UTHOMAS, DANIEL A TINA M STEPHENS 2043 LORRAINE DR SWAIKEN, SC 29801---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 75FT OF TR 3430 49 26 34 2 38103040007 UUNITED MUSLIM ASSN OF NY INC 6741 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 W 150FT OF TR 54 OR 1439 PG 110630 49 26 54 0 38104840002 UVALENTINE, EFRAIN 3241 68TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7225 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 75FT OF TR 3230 49 26 32 1 38102720001 UWALKER, JAMES W & CINDY D 3160 70TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---7212 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 150FT OF TR 2830 49 26 28 0 38102360005 UWOOD, DOUGLAS A & MICHELLE S 3130 70TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 S 150FT OF TR 2730 49 26 27 0 38102280004 UWRIGHT, DEBRA JOAN 3155 66TH ST SWNAPLES, FL 34105---0 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 75FT OF TR 6330 49 26 63 1 38105640007 UGolden Gate Area Civic AssociationMs. Kaydee Tuff4701 Golden Gate ParkwayNaples, FL 34116Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA.Petition: PL20200000497 | Buffer: 1000' | Date: 10/1/2020 | Site Location: 38104960005POList_1000_PL20200000497.xls3.A.cPacket Pg. 68Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PL20200000497,6750 Golden Gate Parkway Non- Conforming Use Change A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D.Wa yne Arnold,AICP,of Q.Grady Minor &Associates,P.A.and Richard D.Yo vanovich,Esq.of Coleman,Yo vanovich &Koester,P.A., representing El Shaddai of Grace,Inc.(Applicant)will be held Monday,October 26,2020,5:30 pm at Parkway Life Church, 5975 Golden Gate Pkwy,Naples,FL 34116.Individuals who would like to participate remotely or have questions or comments should contact Sharon Umpenhour,Senior Planning Te chnician with Q.Grady Minor &Associates,P.A.by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com,phone:239-947-1144,or mail: 3800 Via Del Rey,Bonita Springs,FL 34134.Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. El Shaddai of Grace,Inc.has submitted a formal application to Collier County seeking approval of a Non-Conforming Use Change (NUC).The applicant is proposing to replace the 612- seat bingo hall use with a religious facility (church),with typical accessory uses,having a maximum capacity of 321 seats.The proposed church would occupy the existing building space with only the need to make minor interior and exterior renovations to the building.The site has 138 existing parking spaces which is consistent with the parking requirements for a 321-seat church. The subject property (Parcel ID #38104960005)is comprised of approximately 2.11±acres,located at 6750 Golden Gate Parkway in Section 30,To wnship 49 South,Range 26 East in Collier County,Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes,it is not a public hearing. 3.A.c Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden 3.A.c Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 3.A.c Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) Transcript PL20200000497 6750 Golden Gate Parkway October 26, 2020 NIM Page 1 of 1 A Neighborhood Information Meeting was scheduled for Monday, October 26, 2020, 5:30 pm at Parkway Life Church, 5975 Golden Gate Pkwy, Naples, FL 34116. No members of the public registered to participate via Zoom or attended in person; therefore, the meeting was not held. 3.A.c Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Attachment B - PL20200000497 6750 GG Pkwy NUC HEX Backup (14037 : PL20200000497 - 6750 Golden Gate Parkway (NUC)) 11/12/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.B Item Summary: PETITION NO. VA PL20190001938 - An after-the-fact variance request from Section 4.02.01.A, Table 2.1, of the Collier County Land Development Code to reduce the minimum side yard setback from 30 feet to 6.6 feet on the southern property line for an accessory shed structure containing utilities for a single-family dwelling in the Estates (E) zoning district located at 1035 31st Street SW in Section 13, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Commissioner District 5 Meeting Date: 11/12/2020 Prepared by: Title: Planner – Zoning Name: John Kelly 10/26/2020 4:51 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 10/26/2020 4:51 PM Approved By: Review: Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 10/29/2020 3:04 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Rose Burke Review Item Completed 10/29/2020 5:53 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 10/30/2020 2:25 PM Zoning Anita Jenkins Review Item Completed 11/02/2020 9:52 AM Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 11/12/2020 9:00 AM 3.B Packet Pg. 74 VA-PL20190001938; Galindo Page 1 of 6 10/12/2020 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 12, 2020 SUBJECT: PETITION VA-PL20190001938; 1035 31ST STREET SW - GALINDO _____________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner/Applicant: Agent: Orlando and Maria Galindo 1035 31st Street SW N/A Naples, FL 34117 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) consider an application for an after-the-fact variance from Section 4.02.01 A., Table 2.1, of the LDC to reduce the minimum side yard setback from 30 feet to 6.6 feet on the southern property line for an accessory shed structure containing utilities for a single-family dwelling in the Estates (E) zoning district. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 1035 31st Street SW and is legally described as the South ½ of Tract 12, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 15, in Section 13, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 2.5± acres (See location map on page 2). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Applicant is requesting an after-the-fact variance to allow for the continued existence of an accessory shed that was constructed within the required side yard setback without having obtained a building permit. The shed was constructed upon a concrete slab and is used to house utility equipment serving the single-family residence. The applicant became aware of the permit issue after having been contacted by Collier County Code Enforcement acting in response to a formal complaint, CESD20190002541. During abatement efforts the applicant learned that the shed was placed 23.6 feet too close to the south side property line and does not satisfy setback requirements. It is the applicant’s desire to maintain the accessory shed in its present location by means of the subject variance and to abate the Code violation by obtaining a building permit. 3.B.a Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: VA-Pl20190001938 Galindo - Staff Report 101220 (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) VA-PL20190001938; Galindo Page 2 of 6 10/12/2020 3.B.aPacket Pg. 76Attachment: VA-Pl20190001938 Galindo - Staff Report 101220 (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street VA-PL20190001938; Galindo Page 3 of 6 10/12/2020 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Single-family residential within the Estates (E) zoning district East: 31st Street SW (Right-of-Way) then single-family residential within the Estates (E) zoning district South: Unimproved single-family property located within the Estates (E) zoning district West: Canal then Single-family residential within the Estates (E) zoning district Collier County GIS 3.B.a Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: VA-Pl20190001938 Galindo - Staff Report 101220 (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) VA-PL20190001938; Galindo Page 4 of 6 10/12/2020 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is shown in the Rural Golden Gate Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan as Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. As stated, the applicant seeks a Variance to reduce the side yard setback in order to allow a shed used to house utility equipment serving a single-family home which is an authorized land use. The GMP does not address individual variance requests related to land use. ZONING DIVISION ANALYSIS: The decision to grant a variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03. Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? Yes, the primary use of the shed is to house water equipment serving the principal residence with potable water; therefore, the shed was located next to the well. Additionally, it was the applicant’s desire to locate said water equipment away from the residence due to potential noise that could adversely impact the quality of life of a handicapped resident. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which d o not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? No, it does not appear that there are special conditions or circumstances that are not related to actions of the applicant. The Zoning Division is, however, sympathetic to the needs of residents and use of their private property. While the shed appears to be acceptable, as constructed, it does not meet the setback provisions of the LDC. Unfortunately, the actions of the applicant have led to the need for a variance. c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? No, a literal interpretation does not appear to work undue hardship on the applicant. There are options available to the applicant to bring the shed into compliance. It is, however, clear that there is a financial consequence to the applicant and the cost to relocate or remove the shed may seem unreasonable. Unfortunately, the LDC is specific and financial cost related to compliance with the code is not a criterion for a Variance. It should be noted that the Zoning Division is sympathetic to the applicant’s concern about the cost of compliance. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety and welfare? Yes, the requested variance, if granted, is the minimum required to allow the applicant to maintain the shed in its present location thereby allowing for the issuance of a building permit 3.B.a Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: VA-Pl20190001938 Galindo - Staff Report 101220 (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) VA-PL20190001938; Galindo Page 5 of 6 10/12/2020 that will then allow for the structure to be inspected for structural integrity. e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? Yes, by definition, a Variance bestows some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations specific to a site. LDC Section 9.04.02 allows relief through the Variance process for any dimensional development standard. Other properties facing a similar hardship are entitled to make a similar request and would be conferred equal consideration on a case by case basis. f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Yes. The general intent of the LDC for residential zone districts is to promote lands for single-family housing in areas of low density. While the shed encroaches into the required south side setback, there is a natural vegetative landscape buffer between the encroachment and the neighboring property to the south. The existing front yard setback, total height requirement and rear yard setbacks are not being reduced. Granting the Variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Land Development Code and will not harm public safety, health and welfare. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? Yes, the existing shed is located to the rear of the property and will not be visible from the road. Additionally, the shed is located within a wooded area of both the subject and neighboring property to the south. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Yes, approval of this Variance will not affect or change the requirements of the GMP with respect to density, intensity, compatibility, access/connectivity, or any other applicable provisions. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: The EAC does not normally hear variance petitions. Since the subject variance doesn’t impact any preserve area, the EAC did not hear this petition. SUMMARY FINDINGS: Zoning Division staff is constrained from recommending approval as the application does not comply with the variance criteria as provided in LDC Section 9.04.03 and there are no apparent practical difficulties related to the property. There are however sev eral mitigating factors that are not part of the variance criteria that could be considered by the Hearing Examiner. 3.B.a Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: VA-Pl20190001938 Galindo - Staff Report 101220 (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) VA-PL20190001938; Galindo Page 6 of 6 10/12/2020 1. Support or opposition received in response to the Agent Letter and LDC public hearing notice requirements. 2. The existence of a dense natural vegetative buffer between the shed and the property to the south. 3. The architectural design and color of the shed compliment the house design. 4. The floor area of the shed is significantly less than that allowed by the LDC. 5. The shed is not visible from the road or from adjoining properties. 6. Were the property to the south to request the same variance, the minimum structure-to-structure separation of 10-feet would be satisfied. RECOMMENDATION: The Zoning Division recommendation for the proposed Variance petition VA-PL20190001938 is denial. However, should the Hearing Examiner be inclined to approve the subject petition to reduce the minimum southern side yard setback from 30 feet to 6.6 feet to allow the existing 20.2-foot by 14.2 foot shed to remain, as depicted within the attached Boundary Survey (see Attachment A) the following condition of approval should apply: The petitioner must apply for and obtain a building permit for said shed and the shed must pass all inspections and be issued a Certificate of Occupancy/Completion upon completion of construction. Attachments: Attachment A - Boundary Survey Attachment B - Applicant’s Back-up, including Application & Supporting Documents 3.B.a Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: VA-Pl20190001938 Galindo - Staff Report 101220 (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.bPacket Pg. 81Attachment: Attachment A - Survey (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 82Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 83Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 84Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 85Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 86Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 87Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 88Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 89Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 90Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 91Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 92Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 93Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 94Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 95Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 96Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 97Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 98Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - 3.B.cPacket Pg. 99Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 100Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 101Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 102Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 103Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 104Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 105Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 106Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 107Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 108Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.c Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - 3.B.cPacket Pg. 110Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 111Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 112Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - 3.B.cPacket Pg. 113Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 114Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 115Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 116Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 117Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 118Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 119Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 120Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 3.B.cPacket Pg. 121Attachment: Attachment B - Applicant Backup (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) MCoiner County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing Waiver Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner For Petition Number(s): Regarding the above subject petition number(s),lilaiL a (^dl/nrln _ (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. ■"^aria QjQl'inrJr)Name: r Qyj'n Date: Signature:. < |rOU/<pt KLappI icant* D Legal Counsel to Applicant * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. 3.B.d Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Hybrid Meeting Waivers (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) »teCower County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountvfl.gQv (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing Waiver Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner For Petition Nunrjber(s): Regarding the above subject petition number(s), dr-lnnc/o (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: QHGndo (^nffnr/o Date: ^ Signature:(^ " VtOt Jp 12_J\pplicant* D Legal Counsel to Applicant * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. 3.B.d Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Hybrid Meeting Waivers (14033 : PL20190001938 - 1035 31st Street SW Variance - Galindo -) 11/12/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.C Item Summary: PETITION NO. VA-PL20190002701 – CitySwitch II-A, LLC request two variances from LDC Section 5.05.09(G)(7)(b), to reduce the eastern boundary setback of 125 feet to 60.5 feet and from the western boundary setback of 125 feet to 82.2 feet for a proposed 250 foot communications tower on a parcel in the east ½ of the northwest ¼ of the southwest ¼ of the northeast ¼ of the northwest ¼ of Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Principal Planner] Commission District 5 Meeting Date: 11/12/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Tim Finn 10/23/2020 10:55 AM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 10/23/2020 10:55 AM Approved By: Review: Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 10/23/2020 2:01 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Rose Burke Review Item Completed 10/29/2020 5:52 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 10/30/2020 5:33 PM Zoning Anita Jenkins Review Item Completed 11/04/2020 10:37 AM Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 11/12/2020 9:00 AM 3.C Packet Pg. 124 VA-PL20190002701 (Kapok St Cell Tower) Revised: November 3, 2020 Page 1 of 6 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 12, 2020 SUBJECT: PETITION VA-PL20190002701 (KAPOK ST CELL TOWER) _____________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/CONTRACT PURCHASER/AGENT: Owner: Applicant/Contract Purchaser: Johannes Steffens CitySwitch II-A, LLC 542 Ethel Ave SE 1900 Century Place, Suite 320 Grand Rapids, MI 49506 Atlanta, GA 30345 Agents: Kendal Lotze Jim Alderman Jeff Wright Ignite Wireless J&J Wireless Consultants LLC Henderson, Franklin, 102 Mary Alice Park Rd. 6122 7th Ave W Starners & Holt, P.A. Cumming, GA 30040 Bradenton, FL 34209 8889 Pelican Bay Blvd, Suite 400 Naples, FL 34108 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) consider an application for two variances from the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) Section 5.05.09(G)(7)(b), to reduce the eastern boundary setback of 125 feet to 60.5 feet and from the western boundary setback of 125 feet to 82.2 feet for a proposed 250 foot communications tower. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located on a parcel in the east ½ of the northwest ¼ of the southwest ¼ of the northeast ¼ of the northwest ¼ of Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on page 2). 3.C.a Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Staff Report - Kapok St Cell Tower (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) VA-PL20190002701 (Kapok St Cell Tower) Revised: November 3, 2020 Page 2 of 6 3.C.aPacket Pg. 126Attachment: Staff Report - Kapok St Cell Tower (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) VA-PL20190002701 (Kapok St Cell Tower) Revised: November 3, 2020 Page 3 of 6 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Per LDC 5.05.09(G)(7)(b), which provides (in part) that communications towers “shall be separated . . . from all other surrounding property boundaries by a distance not less than one-half (1/2) the height of the tower and its antennas, or the tower's certified collapse area, whichever distance is greater.” Because the proposed tower is 250’ tall, the separation requirement would be 125’ (a greater distance than the tower’s certified collapse area). The petitioner is requesting a reduction from the eastern and western boundary setbacks to situate a proposed communication tower. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding boundaries of the subject property: North: Developed agricultural, with a current zoning designation of Agricultural zoning designation with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use receiving and North Bell Meade Overlay districts East: Developed agricultural, with a current zoning designation of Agricultural zoning designation with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use receiving and North Bell Meade Overlay districts South: Undeveloped land, with a current zoning designation of Agricultural zoning designation with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use receiving and North Bell Meade Overlay districts West: Undeveloped land, with a current zoning designation of Agricultural zoning designation with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use receiving and North Bell Meade Overlay districts Collier County Property Appraiser 3.C.a Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Staff Report - Kapok St Cell Tower (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) VA-PL20190002701 (Kapok St Cell Tower) Revised: November 3, 2020 Page 4 of 6 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is located within the Agriculture Rural Fringe Receiving lands of the County’s Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual Variance requests but deals with the larger issue of the actual use. As previously noted, the petitioner seeks variances requesting a reduction from the eastern and western boundary setbacks to situate a proposed communication tower. The subject use is consistent with the FLUM of the GMP. The requested variance does not have any impact on this property's consistency with the County's GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: The request are variances from LDC 5.05.09(G)(7)(b), which provides (in part) that communications towers “shall be separated . . . from all other surrounding property boundaries by a distance not less than one-half (1/2) the height of the tower and its antennas, or the tower's certified collapse area, whichever distance is greater.” Because the proposed tower is 250’ tall, the separation requirement would be 125’ (a greater distance than the tower’s certified collapse area). (See Attachment A – Kapok St Certified Fall Radius Letter) As indicated on the site drawing included with this submittal, the proposed communications tower meets this 125’ distance separation requirement with respect to the northern and southern property boundaries. Additionally, the proposed tower is separated from surrounding property boundaries in all directions by a distance that far exceeds its certified collapse area (i.e., it meets the lesser of the two distance measurements provided in the LDC, in all directions). However, because the proposed tower does not meet the greater of the two LDC distance measurements with respect to eastern and western boundaries, a variance is necessary. More specifically the petitioner is seeking two variances from the required 125’ separation requirement, to allow (1) for the eastern boundary, a separation of 60.5; and (2) for the western boundary, a separation of 82.2. (See Attachment B – Zoning Drawings, Sheet C-1 - Overall Site Plan) The LDC does allow for essential services which includes communication towers (LDC 2.03.08.A.2.a.3.x). Per LDC Section 1.08.02, an essential service requires that government entities such as police, fire, EMS, etc. have use of the tower for their designated needs. The communications tower will be utilizing the First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) which is a nationwide wireless network broadband network that will be dedicated to first responders for use in disasters, emergencies and daily public safety work. (See Attachment C – FirstNet Info) Furthermore, it should be noted that the proposed tower does not require a conditional use but is subject to this variance. (See Attachment D – Zoning Verification Letter dated 3-17-20) Moreover, staff has been receiving opposition letters regarding the close proximity of another tower to be located at 550 Frangipani Avenue approximately 2065 feet east of the Kapok St site. (See Attachment F – Opposition Letters) This 185-foot communications tower has not been built and is currently under SDP review (PL20200000886). The residents feel that these two communications towers will create deleterious effects upon their community. Currently, the LDC does not have any distance separation provisions to guide staff as to how far apart one communication tower can be from another tower. As such, staff will be amending the LDC to address communication tower distance separation requirements in the near future. It should be noted, that the applicant has stated that in regard to shared tower use, that there are not any towers that would provide necessary and adequate capacity and geographic coverage area to achieve their 3.C.a Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Staff Report - Kapok St Cell Tower (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) VA-PL20190002701 (Kapok St Cell Tower) Revised: November 3, 2020 Page 5 of 6 emergency services objectives, and sharing another tower would not be a feasible option. (See Attachment G – Shared Tower Use Response) The decision to grant a variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03. A. through H. (in bold font below). Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? Yes, the property is rectangular, and the proposed structure is unique (a 250’ tall essential services communications tower) with a required 125 ft separation requirement from all property boundaries. The proposed tower meets the separation requirement with respect to the northern (181.9 ft separation) and southern (152.8 ft separation) boundaries. However, the eastern (60.5 ft separation) and western (82.2 ft separation) boundaries do not meet the 125 ft separation requirement as the rectangular shape of the parcel are significantly narrowed on the eastern and western parcel boundaries thus preventing the applicant from complying with the 125 ft requirement. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? Yes, while the property is large enough to safely accommodate the proposed communications tower, its rectangular shape makes it necessary to obtain variances to meet LDC separation requirements for the eastern and western boundaries c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? Yes, because of the rectangular shape of this lot this would bestow an undue hardship on the owner preventing construction of a 250-communication tower as presented in the overall site plan. Moreover, there is a need for important essential services communications for this area. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety and welfare? Yes, the Variance proposed would be the minimum Variance to allow the reduction of the eastern boundary setback of 125 feet to 60.5 feet and from the western boundary setback of 125 feet to 82.2 feet for a proposed 250-foot communications tower. Approval of the Variance would not have a negative impact on standards of health, safety, and welfare of the abutting parcels. e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? 3.C.a Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Staff Report - Kapok St Cell Tower (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) VA-PL20190002701 (Kapok St Cell Tower) Revised: November 3, 2020 Page 6 of 6 Yes, by definition, a Variance bestows some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations specific to a site. LDC Section 9.04.02 provides relief through the Variance process for any dimensional development standard, such as the requested eastern and western boundary setback decrease. As such, other properties facing a similar hardship would be entitled to make a similar request and would be conferred equal consideration on a case by case basis. f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of the LDC and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or other detrimental to the public welfare. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? The applicant states, “Essential public services communications towers are critically important in this fairly remote area of the County. Population in this area is less dense than urban areas, and communications at this location can be challenging in storm and other emergency events.” Staff concurs with this statement and further notes that currently there is not any existing residences to the east and west of the subject property and is not within the 125-foot separation requirement. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the GMP? Approval of this Variance will not affect or change the requirements of the GMP. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2 -1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) approve Petition VA- PL20190002701, Kapok St Cell Tower Variance for two variances from LDC Section 5.05.09(G)(7)(b), to reduce the eastern boundary setback of 125 feet to 60.5 feet and from the western boundary setback of 125 feet to 82.2 feet for a proposed 250 foot communications tower. Attachments: A) Kapok St Certified Fall Radius Letter B) Zoning Drawings – Revised 08/05/2020 C) FirstNet Information D) Zoning Verification Letter dated 3-17-20 E) Application/Backup Materials F) Opposition Letters G) Shared Tower Use Response 3.C.a Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Staff Report - Kapok St Cell Tower (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 5 a bre lndustries Towers and Poles November 18, 2019 Tim Cook CitySwitch 1900 Century Place NE, Suite 320 Atlanta, GA 30345 RE: Proposed 250' Sabre Self-Supporting Tower for Kapok Street, FL Dear Mr. Cook, Upon receipt of order, we propose to design a tower for the above referenced project for an ASCE 7- 16 Ultimate Wind Speed of 160 mph, Structure Class ll, Exposure C, Topographic Category 1 in accordance with the Telecommunications lndustry Association Standard ANSI/TlA-222-G, i'structural Standard for Antenna Supporting Structures and Antennas". When designed according to this standard, the wind pressures and steel strength capacities include several safety factors, resulting in an overall minimum safety factor of 25%. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that the tower will fail structurally in a wind event where the design wind speed is exceeded within the range of the built-in safety ractors. Should the wind speed increase beyond lhe capacity of the built-in safety factors, to the point of lailure of one or more structural elements, the most likely location of the failure would be within one or more of the tower members in the upper portion. This would result in a buckling failure mode, where the loaded member would bend beyond its elastic limit (beyond the point where the member would return to its original shape upon removal of the wind load). Therefore, it is likely that the overall effect of such an extreme wind event would be localized buckling of a tower section. Assuming that the wind pressure profile is similar to that used to design the towei, the tower is most likely to buckle at the location of the highest combined stress ratio in the upper portion of the tower. This would result in the portion of the tower above the failure location "folding over" onto the portion of the tower below the failure location. Please note that this letter only applies to the above reterenced tower designed and manufactured by Sabre Towers & Poles. ln the unlikely event of total separation, this would result in collapse within a 100' x 100' compound. Sincerely, Robert E. Beacom, P.E., S.E. Engineering Supervisor (,.r l.1 * grArE of Sabre Towers and Poles . 7101 Southbridge Drive . P.0. Box 658 . Sioux City, IA 51102-0658 P: 772-258-6690 F: 772-279-08L4 W: www.SabreTowersandPoles.com 3.C.b Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Attachment A - Kapok St Certfied Fall Radius Letter (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Digitally signed by Dennis Abel Date: 2020.08.05 08:27:46 -04'00' 3.C.c Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Attachment B - Zoning Drawings (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) KAPOK STREET 12906066 NW 1/4, SEC. 15, T-49-S, R-27-E COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RAWLAND TOWER SURVEYPROJECT NO. 19-1586 SMW Engineering Group, Inc.FDH-NC158 Business Center DriveBirmingham, Alabama 35244Ph: 205-252-6985www.smweng.com3.C.c Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Attachment B - Zoning Drawings (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) NW 1/4, SEC. 15, T-49-S, R-27-E COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RAWLAND TOWER SURVEYPROJECT NO. 19-1586 SMW Engineering Group, Inc.SECTION OVERVIEW NOT TO SCALE FDH-NC158 Business Center DriveBirmingham, Alabama 35244Ph: 205-252-6985www.smweng.comKAPOK STREET 12906066 3.C.c Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Attachment B - Zoning Drawings (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) NW 1/4, SEC. 15, T-49-S, R-27-E COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RAWLAND TOWER SURVEYPROJECT NO. 19-1586 SMW Engineering Group, Inc.PARENT TRACT OVERVIEW NOT TO SCALE FDH-NC158 Business Center DriveBirmingham, Alabama 35244Ph: 205-252-6985www.smweng.com’’ KAPOK STREET 12906066 3.C.c Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Attachment B - Zoning Drawings (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Digitally signed by Dennis Abel Date: 2020.08.05 08:28:09 -04'00' 3.C.c Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Attachment B - Zoning Drawings (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Digitally signed by Dennis Abel Date: 2020.08.05 08:28:21 -04'00' 3.C.c Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Attachment B - Zoning Drawings (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Digitally signed by Dennis Abel Date: 2020.08.05 08:28:34 -04'00' 3.C.c Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Attachment B - Zoning Drawings (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Digitally signed by Dennis Abel Date: 2020.08.05 08:28:50 -04'00' 3.C.c Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Attachment B - Zoning Drawings (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Digitally signed by Dennis Abel Date: 2020.08.05 08:29:07 -04'00' 3.C.c Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Attachment B - Zoning Drawings (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Transforming public safety communications The First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) has entered into a public-private partnership with AT&T to build the first nationwide wireless broadband network dedicated to first responders for use in disasters, emergencies and daily public safety work. FirstNet provides initial funding, 20 MHz of spectrum and deep public safety expertise to the partnership. AT&T brings a proven track record and strong commitment to public safety, as well as the commercial expertise and nationwide resources to deploy, maintain and operate the network. This 25-year partnership offers the best overall value to America and its public safety responders – both from an investment perspective and in terms of the lifesaving technology it will put in the hands of law enforcement, fire and emergency medical personnel in communities across the nation. FirstNet will serve... FIRST RESPONDERS COMMUNITIES THE NATION IN fire, police, EMS counties, cities, tribal, rural ACROSS 50 states, territories & DC Technology first responders need to save lives, protect communities MODERNIZED PRIORITIZED SPECIALIZED innovative app & device ecosystem network improvements & upgrades commercially proven cybersecurity solutions emergency communications receive highest priority rapid buildout with public safety input nationwide public safety solutions leveraging existing infrastructure robust coverage where public safety needs it connectivity for advanced mobile data highly available customer care Learn more at FirstNet.gov/mediakit 5 3.C.d Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Attachment C - FirstNet Info (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) info@firstnet.gov | www.firstnet.gov | 571-665-6100 TOP10 ASKED QUESTIONS FREQUENTLY 1. What is the First Responder Network Authority? The First Responder Network Authority is the independent authority established by Congress to deliver a nationwide broadband network dedicated to public safety. The Network is strengthening public safety users’ communications capabilities, enabling them to respond more quickly and effectively to accidents, disasters, and emergencies. The First Responder Network Authority is led by a Board of leaders and executives from the public safety community; federal, state, and local governments; and the technology, finance, and wireless sectors. It has a staff of about 200 employees with expertise in public safety, telecommunications, customer service, technology, procurement, and other areas needed to develop the Network. It is headquartered in Reston, VA, and has a technology center and lab in Boulder, CO. 2. What led to the creation of the First Responder Network Authority? The 9/11 terrorist attacks brought to the forefront the many communications challenges that first responders face during emergencies and disasters. These issues were captured in the 9/11 Commission Report, which identified gaps in emergency communications and recommended a nationwide network for law enforcement, fire, and emergency medical personnel communications. The public safety community united to fulfill the 9/11 Commission’s recommendation. Public safety organizations and associations advocated before Congress for a dedicated, reliable wireless network for first responders. Their advocacy efforts led to the passage of legislation in 2012 to create the agency to deploy the Network in all U.S. states and territories, including rural communities and tribal nations. 3. How has public safety been involved in the vision for the FirstNet network? Public safety officials have worked closely with the First Responder Network Authority since its inception in 2012 to ensure the Network meets first responders’ needs – today and in the future. The agency’s outreach and consultation efforts have connected the organization to more than 1.8 million first responders and state public safety and technology executives across the country. Specifically, the First Responder Network Authority has consulted extensively with state single points of contact (SPOCs) in each of the 50 U.S. states, 5 territories, and the District of Columbia, as well as local/municipal, tribal and federal public safety leaders. It also coordinates with public safety through the Public Safety Advisory Committee (PSAC), which provides guidance and subject matter expertise from a first responder perspective. Public safety leaders at the national, state and local levels continue to advocate for and support deployment of the Network. 4. How was AT&T selected to build, operate, and maintain the FirstNet network? The First Responder Network Authority and the Department of Interior made the 25-year award based on the determination of the overall best value solution for FirstNet and public safety. The buildup to the award included a fair, competitive procurement process that began in January 2016 with release of the Network RFP. The procurement process followed the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and encouraged offerors to provide innovative solutions that could meet or exceed the needs of public safety. The procurement was open to all entities, whether traditional wireless companies or new entrants, provided their proposal could meet the RFP’s statement of objectives. AT&T was selected on a best-value award that considered financial sustainability and was based on more than just a technically acceptable solution at the lowest cost. The evaluation of proposals assessed the offerors’ ability to submit a cost-effective and innovative model, and to meet or exceed the 16 objectives and evaluation factors outlined in the FirstNet RFP. 5. Why is the Network being built and operated through a public-private partnership? The First Responder Network Authority and AT&T are modernizing and improving public safety communications by leveraging private sector resources, infrastructure, and cost-saving synergies to deploy and operate the Network. This public-private model also helps keep costs down for American taxpayers. To do this, Congress used the sale of communications airwaves (or spectrum) to fund FirstNet’s initial operations and help start network deployment; the $7 billion FirstNet received in initial funding came from FCC spectrum auction revenue, not taxpayer funds. If the federal government were to build, maintain and operate this Network, the estimated cost would be tens of billions of dollars over 25 years. The Government Accountability Office has estimated it could cost up to $47 billion over 10 years to construct and operate the Network. With this partnership approach, the First Responder Network Authority and AT&T do not need any additional federal funding to build and operate the Network – it is a fully funded, self-sustaining Network. In return, America’s first responders get services far above and beyond what they have today over a first-class broadband network dedicated to their communications needs. 3.C.d Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Attachment C - FirstNet Info (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) info@firstnet.gov | www.firstnet.gov | 571-665-6100 6. What are the key terms this public-private partnership? Congress intended for the Network to be built and operated as a public-private partnership that brings together the best of the private sector, including commercial best practices, infrastructure, and resources – with the First Responder Network Authority’s public safety expertise. This approach will lead to a fully-funded, self-sustaining Network that will serve public safety for years to come. This business model is built upon the efficient use of resources, infrastructure, cost-saving synergies, and incentives, including: • 20 MHz of federally owned spectrum and $6.5 billion in initial funding to the partnership; in return AT&T will deploy and operate a nation- wide high-speed broadband network for public safety over 25 years. • AT&T will invest about $40 billion over the life of the contract to build, operate, deploy, and maintain the Network, and together with the First Responder Network Authority will help ensure the Network evolves with the needs of public safety. • AT&T can use FirstNet’s spectrum when it is not being used by public safety for other, commercial purposes. The company will prioritize first responders over any other commercial users. • First Responder Network Authority will oversee the contract to ensure it delivers innovation, technology and customer care to public safety through various mechanisms, including subscriber adoption targets, milestone buildouts, disincentive fees and other mechanisms outlined in the contract. 7. What will the FirstNet Network provide first responders that they don’t have today? Today, in emergencies and at large events, heavy public use can lead to wireless communications networks becoming overloaded and inaccessible. In those instances, public safety users are treated the same as any other commercial or enterprise user, and communications can be limited due to congestion and capacity issues. With the FirstNet Network, public safety will get a dedicated “fast lane” that provides highly secure communications every day and for every emergency. It will deliver specialized features to public safety that are not available on wireless networks today – such as priority access; preemption; more network capacity; and a resilient, hardened connection. The Network will deliver more than just a public-safety-dedicated wireless connection – it is also creating devices and apps ecosystems that will connect first responders to innovative, life-saving technologies. 8. How will the Network benefit first responders and help them do their jobs better? FirstNet will improve communications, response times and outcomes for first responders from coast-to-coast, in rural and urban areas, inland and on boarders – leading to safer, and more secure communities. The Network will provide first responders with innovation and robust capacity so they can take advantage of advanced technologies, tools and services during emergencies, such as: • Applications that allow first responders to reliably share videos, text messages, photos and other information during incidents in near real-time; • Advanced capabilities, like camera-equipped connected drones and robots, to deliver images of wildfires, floods or other events; • Improved location services to help with mapping capabilities during rescue and recovery operations; and • Wearables that could relay biometric data of a patient to the hospital or alert when a fire fighter is in distress. Network technology will also be tested and validated through the FirstNet Innovation and Test Lab, located in Boulder, CO, so first responders will have the proven tools they need in disasters and emergencies. 9. What’s happening with FirstNet now? All 50 states, five U.S. territories and Washington, D.C., have “opted in,” to FirstNet, meaning each has accepted its individual State Plan detailing how the network will be deployed in their state/territory. The First Responder Network Authority’s public-private partnership with AT&T provides first responders with immediate access to mission-critical capabilities over the FirstNet network. This includes priority and preemption features that give first responders their own “fast lane” on the public safety network to communicate and share information during emergencies, large events, or other situations when commercial networks could become congested. FirstNet is the only broadband network to provide ruthless preemption for public safety. Key FirstNet activities include: Expanding the Network and Building Out Band 14: The First Responder Network Authority has issued work orders to deploy the RANs. This gave AT&T the green light to expand FirstNet’s footprint and deploy Band 14 capacity and coverage throughout the nation, providing first responders with the bandwidth and mission critical connections they need to communicate, share information, and use innovative technologies every day and in every emergency. Driving public safety innovation: FirstNet is also unlocking a new technology marketplace for public safety, enabling first responders to benefit from advancements in innovation. The FirstNet App Catalog store will be filling up with FirstNet-approved mobile apps that are optimized for public safety use over the Network. Securing emergency communications: FirstNet’s first-of-its-kind core infrastructure will give first responders the dedicated, highly secure, non-commercial network they deserve. The FirstNet Core, delivered in March 2018, provides full encryption of public safety data over FirstNet and end-to-end cyber security. FirstNet subscribers also have access to a dedicated Security Operations Center, offering 24/7/365 support. Engaging with public safety: The First Responder Network Authority will continue to engage with public safety in the states, territories, federal agencies, and tribal nations to ensure the network meets their needs and incorporate their feedback in the design of future FirstNet products and services. 10. How can I learn more? Stay up-to-date on the First Responder Network Authority activities and the building and deployment of FirstNet at www.firstnet.gov. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. 3.C.d Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Attachment C - FirstNet Info (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.ePacket Pg. 148Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell 3.C.ePacket Pg. 149Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell 3.C.e Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.e Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Attachment D - Zoning Verification Letter - 3-17-20 (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Johannes Steffens CitySwitch//Ͳ͕ LLC 1900 Century Place, Suite 320 Atlanta GA 30345 (404) 857-0858 (414) 403-4927 kevin.saso@cityswitch.com Kendal Lotze Ignite Wireless 102 Mary Alice Park Rd Cumming GA 30040 (407) 239-0846 (Preferred) (770) 862-8089 Kendal@ignitewireless.com ZĞǀŝƐĞĚĂƚĞ͗ϴ͘18͘ϮϬϮϬ :Θ:tŝƌĞůĞƐƐŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚƐ>> :ŝŵůĚĞƌŵĂŶ ϲϭϮϮϳƚŚǀĞt ;ϵϱϰͿ ϯϬϯͲϯϭϳϬ ũũǁŝƌĞůĞƐƐĐŽŶƐƵůƚΛLJĂŚŽŽ͘ĐŽŵ &>ϯϰϮϬϵƌĂĚĞŶƚŽŶ Jeff Wright Henderson, Franklin, Starners & Holt, P.A. 8889 Pelican Bay Boulevard, Suite 400 Naples FL 34108 (239) 344-1371 (239)344-1508 jeff.wright@henlaw.com 3.C.f Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 0 $0!0 "000 ///%+))(&,'+.*&-0  000!0 00  0     0#0 0    + " #'-'-""*!-"%--%&'%- &&"'"!&-''-"(--'-,-'&-#''"!- %")-'"!-&'&--!&&%,- !"% '"!-!--"(!-"!-'- "%-"- "(!',- " &&"!%&-*&'-'-''$ ***"%")!'!+&$+ $ - #+%+%#%)$&+''% ( %$+ '#%#/ ' +!*+'!/ $""+#*./ ,/ ))$*$#/  " $+&''+/ (#&#/ -#+/ (*+%!)/ ((+ // + / #+%+%#%)$&+''% ( %$+ - ! +$++&''++ (*++ ((++ +++ #+%+%#%)$&+''% ( %$+ - ! +$++&''++ (*++ ((++ +++ #+%+%#%)$&+''% ( %$+ - ! +$++&''++ (*++ ((++ +++ #+%+%#%)$&+''% ( %$+ - ! +$++&''++ (*++ ((++ +  + +  + (55-*,.5-".5.."5.)5."5**&#.#)(5*&-5*,)0#5."5 )&&)1#(!5 5.#&52*&(.#)(5) 5."5,+/-.5#(&/#(!51".5-.,/./,-5,52#-.#(!5(51".5#-5*,)*)-5." ')/(.5) 5 (,)"'(.5 *,)*)-5/-#(!5(/',-5 #5 ,/5 ,)(.5-.%5 ,)'5 5 .5.)5 5 . 1"(5 *,)*,.35)1(,5 */,"-5 *,)*,.35 1"(5 2#-.#(!5 *,#(#*&5-.,/./,5 1-5/#&.5 #(&/ /#&#(!5*,'#.5(/',-5# 5*)--#&51"35(,)"'(.5#-5(--,35")152#-.#(!5(,)"'(. '5.)55.  ),5*,)$.-5/."),#45/(,55.#)(5  5*,)0#55.#&5-,#*.#)(5) 5-#.5&.,.#)(- #(&/#(!5(35,!#(!5(5 #&&#(!  /,-/(.5.)5 5-.#)(5  5 -. 5-"&&55!/#5#(5."#,5,)''(.#)(5.)5."5 ,#(! 2'#(,5(5 ."5,#(!5 2'#(,5-"&&55!/#5#(5."5.,'#(.#)(5.)5**,)05),5(35 0,#(5*.#.#)(535."5,#.,#5"5&#-.5&)15&-5,--5."5 )&&)1#(!5,#.,# ,5.",5-*#&5 )(#.#)(-5(5#,/'-.(-5 2#-.#(!5 1"#"5,5*/&#,5.)5."5&).#)(5-#4 (5",.,#-.#-5) 5."5&(5-.,/./,5),5/#&#(!5#(0)&0 //$// 3.C.f Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 4/27/2018 Page 5 of 6 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Variance Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) Pre-Application Meeting Notes 1 Project Narrative Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Conceptual Site Plan 24” x 36” and one 8 ½ ” x 11” copy Survey of property showing the encroachment (measured in feet) 2 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 Deeds/Legal’s 3 Location map 1 Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial 5 Historical Survey or waiver request 1 Environmental Data Requirements or exemption justification 3 Once the first set of review comments are posted, provide the assigned planner the Property Owner Advisory Letter and Certification 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: x Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. x Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 4/27/2018 Page 6 of 6 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following reviewers: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Historical Review City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Immokalee Water/Sewer District Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Parks and Recreation: David Berra Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00 Variance Petition: o Residential- $2,000.00 o Non-Residential- $5,000.00 o 5th and Subsequent Review- 20% of original fee Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 After The Fact Zoning/Land Use Petitions: 2x the normal petition fee Listed Species Survey (if EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Zoning Division ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 __________________________________ ____________________ Applicant Signature Date __________________________________ Printed Name x ✔ Kendal Lotze 4/10/2020 3.C.f Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 11/14/2013 X 30 Years 3.C.f Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Kendal Lotze 4/10/2020 3.C.f Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) K>>/ZKhEdz'KsZEDEd 'ZKtd,DE'DEd/s/^/KE ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^^,KZ/s EW>^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϱϳϮϰ ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 3OHDVH FRPSOHWH WKH IROORZLQJ DQG HPDLO WR*0'B$GGUHVVLQJ#FROOLHUJRYQHW RU ID[ WR WKH 2SHUDWLRQV 'HSDUWPHQWDWRUVXEPLWLQSHUVRQWRWKH$GGUHVVLQJ'HSDUWPHQWDWWKHDERYHDGGUHVV)RUPPXVW EHVLJQHGE\$GGUHVVLQJSHUVRQQHOSULRUWRSUHDSSOLFDWLRQPHHWLQJplease allow 3 days for processing. 1RW DOO LWHPV ZLOO DSSO\ WR HYHU\ SURMHFW ,WHPV LQbold type DUH UHTXLUHGFOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED.)RUPV ROGHU WKDQ  PRQWKV ZLOO UHTXLUH DGGLWLRQDO UHYLHZ DQG DSSURYDO E\ WKH $GGUHVVLQJ 'HSDUWPHQW PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) %/ %ODVWLQJ3HUPLW  %' %RDW'RFN([WHQVLRQ  &DUQLYDO&LUFXV3HUPLW &8 &RQGLWLRQDO8VH  (;3 ([FDYDWLRQ3HUPLW  )3 )LQDO3ODW //$ /RW/LQH$GMXVWPHQW  31& 3URMHFW1DPH&KDQJH  33/ 3ODQV 3ODW5HYLHZ  363 3UHOLPLQDU\6XEGLYLVLRQ3ODW  38'5H]RQH 5= 6WDQGDUG5H]RQH  6'3 6LWH'HYHORSPHQW3ODQ  6'3$ 6'3$PHQGPHQW  6'3, ,QVXEVWDQWLDO&KDQJHWR6'3  6,3 6LWH,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ  6,3, ,QVXEVWDQWLDO&KDQJHWR6,3  615 6WUHHW1DPH&KDQJH  61& 6WUHHW1DPH&KDQJH±8QSODWWHG  7'5 7UDQVIHURI'HYHORSPHQW5LJKWV  9$ 9DULDQFH  953 9HJHWDWLRQ5HPRYDO3HUPLW  956)3 9HJHWDWLRQ5HPRYDO 6LWH)LOO3HUPLW  27+(5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION RIVXEMHFWSURSHUW\RUSURSHUWLHV(copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s)RIDERYH(attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 675((7$''5(66RU$''5(66(6(as applicable, if already assigned) 352326('675((71$0(6(if applicable) 6,7('(9(/230(173/$1180%(5(for existing projects/sites only) 1 6859(< FRS\QHHGHGRQO\IRUXQSODWWHGSURSHUWLHV  LOCATION MAP PXVWEHDWWDFKHGVKRZLQJH[DFWORFDWLRQRISURMHFWVLWHLQUHODWLRQWRQHDUHVWSXEOLFURDGULJKW RIZD\ 352326('352-(&71$0((if applicable) 6'3RU$5RU3/ X PL20190002701 Parcel ID Number: 00307840002 The E1/2 of the NW1/4 of the SW1/4 of the NE1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 15, Township 49 S, Range 27 E. in Collier County, Florida. Kapok Street/FLC009 Parcels 19 & 20 3.C.f Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) K>>/ZKhEdz'KsZEDEd 'ZKtd,DE'DEd/s/^/KE ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^^,KZ/s EW>^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϱϳϮϰ 3OHDVH5HWXUQ$SSURYHG&KHFNOLVW%\(PDLO3HUVRQDOO\SLFNHGXS ASSOLFDQW1DPH 6LJQDWXUHRQ$GGUHVVLQJ&KHFNOLVWGRHVQRWFRQVWLWXWH3URMHFWDQGRU6WUHHW1DPH DSSURYDODQGLVVXEMHFWWRIXUWKHUUHYLHZE\WKH2SHUDWLRQV'HSDUWPHQW FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number )ROLR1XPEHU )ROLR1XPEHU Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 2 )D[ (PDLO/)D[3KRQH 3URMHFWRUGHYHORSPHQWQDPHVSURSRVHGIRURUDOUHDG\DSSHDULQJLQFRQGRPLQLXPGRFXPHQWV LIDSSOLFDWLRQ LQGLFDWHZKHWKHUSURSRVHGRUH[LVWLQJ  X CitySwitch II, LLC 770-862-8089 kendal@ignitewireless.com N/A 00307880004 00307840002 6/11/2020 3.C.f Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) PL20190002701 00307840002 Revised Date: 8.4.2020 3.C.f Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Collier County, FL Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Dr Naples, FL 34104 Re: Variance Application for Wireless Telecommunications Tower CitySwitch II, LLC Kapok St./FLC009 To Whom It May Concern, We are hereby applying for a Setback Variance of the required half of the tower height setback (125ft) as required by LDC 2.03.08.A.2.a.3.x. of the Collier County Zoning Regulations in order to construct and maintain a Wireless Telecommunications Tower on the property located at Kapok Street, Naples, FL 34117. We are proud to say that the proposed structure will be utilized by AT&T to support the deployment of FirstNet. If unfamiliar, in 2017 the Department of Commerce and First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) signed a 25-year contract with AT&T to build the first nationwide wireless network for America’s First Responders. The FirstNet network is planned to cover all 50 states, five U.S. territories and the District of Columbia, including rural communities and tribal lands. In 2018, CitySwitch was honored to execute an agreement with AT&T to assist in building the infrastructure needed for the deployment of FirstNet as well as their existing wireless network needs. Additional information on FirstNet can be found online at https://firstnet.gov/ . Should you have any questions regarding the application and/or supporting documents provided, please feel free to contact Jim Alderman at 954-303-3170 or email at jjwirelessconsult@yahoo.com . 3.C.f Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Transforming public safety communications The First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) has entered into a public-private partnership with AT&T to build the first nationwide wireless broadband network dedicated to first responders for use in disasters, emergencies and daily public safety work. FirstNet provides initial funding, 20 MHz of spectrum and deep public safety expertise to the partnership. AT&T brings a proven track record and strong commitment to public safety, as well as the commercial expertise and nationwide resources to deploy, maintain and operate the network. This 25-year partnership offers the best overall value to America and its public safety responders – both from an investment perspective and in terms of the lifesaving technology it will put in the hands of law enforcement, fire and emergency medical personnel in communities across the nation. FirstNet will serve... FIRST RESPONDERS COMMUNITIES THE NATION IN fire, police, EMS counties, cities, tribal, rural ACROSS 50 states, territories & DC Technology first responders need to save lives, protect communities MODERNIZED PRIORITIZED SPECIALIZED innovative app & device ecosystem network improvements & upgrades commercially proven cybersecurity solutions emergency communications receive highest priority rapid buildout with public safety input nationwide public safety solutions leveraging existing infrastructure robust coverage where public safety needs it connectivity for advanced mobile data highly available customer care Learn more at FirstNet.gov/mediakit 5 3.C.f Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) info@firstnet.gov | www.firstnet.gov | 571-665-6100 TOP10 ASKED QUESTIONS FREQUENTLY 1. What is the First Responder Network Authority? The First Responder Network Authority is the independent authority established by Congress to deliver a nationwide broadband network dedicated to public safety. The Network is strengthening public safety users’ communications capabilities, enabling them to respond more quickly and effectively to accidents, disasters, and emergencies. The First Responder Network Authority is led by a Board of leaders and executives from the public safety community; federal, state, and local governments; and the technology, finance, and wireless sectors. It has a staff of about 200 employees with expertise in public safety, telecommunications, customer service, technology, procurement, and other areas needed to develop the Network. It is headquartered in Reston, VA, and has a technology center and lab in Boulder, CO. 2. What led to the creation of the First Responder Network Authority? The 9/11 terrorist attacks brought to the forefront the many communications challenges that first responders face during emergencies and disasters. These issues were captured in the 9/11 Commission Report, which identified gaps in emergency communications and recommended a nationwide network for law enforcement, fire, and emergency medical personnel communications. The public safety community united to fulfill the 9/11 Commission’s recommendation. Public safety organizations and associations advocated before Congress for a dedicated, reliable wireless network for first responders. Their advocacy efforts led to the passage of legislation in 2012 to create the agency to deploy the Network in all U.S. states and territories, including rural communities and tribal nations. 3. How has public safety been involved in the vision for the FirstNet network? Public safety officials have worked closely with the First Responder Network Authority since its inception in 2012 to ensure the Network meets first responders’ needs – today and in the future. The agency’s outreach and consultation efforts have connected the organization to more than 1.8 million first responders and state public safety and technology executives across the country. Specifically, the First Responder Network Authority has consulted extensively with state single points of contact (SPOCs) in each of the 50 U.S. states, 5 territories, and the District of Columbia, as well as local/municipal, tribal and federal public safety leaders. It also coordinates with public safety through the Public Safety Advisory Committee (PSAC), which provides guidance and subject matter expertise from a first responder perspective. Public safety leaders at the national, state and local levels continue to advocate for and support deployment of the Network. 4. How was AT&T selected to build, operate, and maintain the FirstNet network? The First Responder Network Authority and the Department of Interior made the 25-year award based on the determination of the overall best value solution for FirstNet and public safety. The buildup to the award included a fair, competitive procurement process that began in January 2016 with release of the Network RFP. The procurement process followed the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and encouraged offerors to provide innovative solutions that could meet or exceed the needs of public safety. The procurement was open to all entities, whether traditional wireless companies or new entrants, provided their proposal could meet the RFP’s statement of objectives. AT&T was selected on a best-value award that considered financial sustainability and was based on more than just a technically acceptable solution at the lowest cost. The evaluation of proposals assessed the offerors’ ability to submit a cost-effective and innovative model, and to meet or exceed the 16 objectives and evaluation factors outlined in the FirstNet RFP. 5. Why is the Network being built and operated through a public-private partnership? The First Responder Network Authority and AT&T are modernizing and improving public safety communications by leveraging private sector resources, infrastructure, and cost-saving synergies to deploy and operate the Network. This public-private model also helps keep costs down for American taxpayers. To do this, Congress used the sale of communications airwaves (or spectrum) to fund FirstNet’s initial operations and help start network deployment; the $7 billion FirstNet received in initial funding came from FCC spectrum auction revenue, not taxpayer funds. If the federal government were to build, maintain and operate this Network, the estimated cost would be tens of billions of dollars over 25 years. The Government Accountability Office has estimated it could cost up to $47 billion over 10 years to construct and operate the Network. With this partnership approach, the First Responder Network Authority and AT&T do not need any additional federal funding to build and operate the Network – it is a fully funded, self-sustaining Network. In return, America’s first responders get services far above and beyond what they have today over a first-class broadband network dedicated to their communications needs. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) info@firstnet.gov | www.firstnet.gov | 571-665-6100 6. What are the key terms this public-private partnership? Congress intended for the Network to be built and operated as a public-private partnership that brings together the best of the private sector, including commercial best practices, infrastructure, and resources – with the First Responder Network Authority’s public safety expertise. This approach will lead to a fully-funded, self-sustaining Network that will serve public safety for years to come. This business model is built upon the efficient use of resources, infrastructure, cost-saving synergies, and incentives, including: • 20 MHz of federally owned spectrum and $6.5 billion in initial funding to the partnership; in return AT&T will deploy and operate a nation- wide high-speed broadband network for public safety over 25 years. • AT&T will invest about $40 billion over the life of the contract to build, operate, deploy, and maintain the Network, and together with the First Responder Network Authority will help ensure the Network evolves with the needs of public safety. • AT&T can use FirstNet’s spectrum when it is not being used by public safety for other, commercial purposes. The company will prioritize first responders over any other commercial users. • First Responder Network Authority will oversee the contract to ensure it delivers innovation, technology and customer care to public safety through various mechanisms, including subscriber adoption targets, milestone buildouts, disincentive fees and other mechanisms outlined in the contract. 7. What will the FirstNet Network provide first responders that they don’t have today? Today, in emergencies and at large events, heavy public use can lead to wireless communications networks becoming overloaded and inaccessible. In those instances, public safety users are treated the same as any other commercial or enterprise user, and communications can be limited due to congestion and capacity issues. With the FirstNet Network, public safety will get a dedicated “fast lane” that provides highly secure communications every day and for every emergency. It will deliver specialized features to public safety that are not available on wireless networks today – such as priority access; preemption; more network capacity; and a resilient, hardened connection. The Network will deliver more than just a public-safety-dedicated wireless connection – it is also creating devices and apps ecosystems that will connect first responders to innovative, life-saving technologies. 8. How will the Network benefit first responders and help them do their jobs better? FirstNet will improve communications, response times and outcomes for first responders from coast-to-coast, in rural and urban areas, inland and on boarders – leading to safer, and more secure communities. The Network will provide first responders with innovation and robust capacity so they can take advantage of advanced technologies, tools and services during emergencies, such as: • Applications that allow first responders to reliably share videos, text messages, photos and other information during incidents in near real-time; • Advanced capabilities, like camera-equipped connected drones and robots, to deliver images of wildfires, floods or other events; • Improved location services to help with mapping capabilities during rescue and recovery operations; and • Wearables that could relay biometric data of a patient to the hospital or alert when a fire fighter is in distress. Network technology will also be tested and validated through the FirstNet Innovation and Test Lab, located in Boulder, CO, so first responders will have the proven tools they need in disasters and emergencies. 9. What’s happening with FirstNet now? All 50 states, five U.S. territories and Washington, D.C., have “opted in,” to FirstNet, meaning each has accepted its individual State Plan detailing how the network will be deployed in their state/territory. The First Responder Network Authority’s public-private partnership with AT&T provides first responders with immediate access to mission-critical capabilities over the FirstNet network. This includes priority and preemption features that give first responders their own “fast lane” on the public safety network to communicate and share information during emergencies, large events, or other situations when commercial networks could become congested. FirstNet is the only broadband network to provide ruthless preemption for public safety. Key FirstNet activities include: Expanding the Network and Building Out Band 14: The First Responder Network Authority has issued work orders to deploy the RANs. This gave AT&T the green light to expand FirstNet’s footprint and deploy Band 14 capacity and coverage throughout the nation, providing first responders with the bandwidth and mission critical connections they need to communicate, share information, and use innovative technologies every day and in every emergency. Driving public safety innovation: FirstNet is also unlocking a new technology marketplace for public safety, enabling first responders to benefit from advancements in innovation. The FirstNet App Catalog store will be filling up with FirstNet-approved mobile apps that are optimized for public safety use over the Network. Securing emergency communications: FirstNet’s first-of-its-kind core infrastructure will give first responders the dedicated, highly secure, non-commercial network they deserve. The FirstNet Core, delivered in March 2018, provides full encryption of public safety data over FirstNet and end-to-end cyber security. FirstNet subscribers also have access to a dedicated Security Operations Center, offering 24/7/365 support. Engaging with public safety: The First Responder Network Authority will continue to engage with public safety in the states, territories, federal agencies, and tribal nations to ensure the network meets their needs and incorporate their feedback in the design of future FirstNet products and services. 10. How can I learn more? Stay up-to-date on the First Responder Network Authority activities and the building and deployment of FirstNet at www.firstnet.gov. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) VARIANCE PETITION APPLICATION (PL20190002701) KAPOK STREET, NAPLES, FL 34117 Parcel ID# 00307840002 PROJECT NARRATIVE & SEPARATE SHEET RESPONSES 1. A DETAILED EXPLANATION OF THE REQUEST INCLUDING WHAT STRUCTURES ARE EXISTING AND WHAT IS PROPOSED; THE AMOUNT OF ENCROACHMENT PROPOSED USING NUMBERS, I.E. REDUCE FRONT SETBACK FROM 25 FT. TO 18 FT.; WHEN PROPERTY OWNER PURCHASED PROPERTY; WHEN EXISTING PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE WAS BUILT (INCLUDE BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER(S) IF POSSIBLE); WHY ENCROACHMENT IS NECESSARY; HOW EXISTING ENCROACHMENT CAME TO BE; ETC. Applicant is proposing to build a 250’ tall, essential services and other shared services communications tower on the subject property (“Property”). The Property (Parcel ID #00307840002) is located within the “agricultural” zoning designation, within RFMUD receiving and North Bell Meade Overlay Districts. The Property is vacant and unimproved. For reference, see the Zoning Verification Letters dated Sept. 18, 2019 and March 17, 2020, which are included with this submittal. Applicant is requesting a variance from LDC Section 5.05.09.G.7, which provides (in part) that communications towers “shall be separated . . . from all other surrounding property boundaries by a distance not less than one-half (1/2) the height of the tower and its antennas, or the tower's certified collapse area, whichever distance is greater.” (Emphasis added.) Because the proposed tower is 250’ tall, the separation requirement would be 125’ (a greater distance than the tower’s certified collapse area). As indicated on the site drawing included with this submittal, the proposed communications tower meets this 125’ distance separation requirement with respect to the northern and southern Property boundaries. Additionally, the proposed tower is separated from surrounding property boundaries in all directions by a distance that far exceeds its certified collapse area (i.e., it meets the lesser of the two distance measurements provided in the LDC, in all directions). However, because the proposed tower does not meet the greater of the two LDC distance measurements with respect to eastern and western boundaries, a variance is necessary. More specifically, Applicant is seeking a variance from the required 125’ separation requirement, to allow (1) for the eastern boundary, a separation of 60’ (65’ less than required); and (2) for the western boundary, a separation of 82’ (43’ less than required). If measured based on the tower’s certified collapse area, the proposed tower exceeds applicable separation requirements: the western boundary is approximately 46’ beyond the tower’s certified collapse area; the eastern boundary is approximately 24.7’ feet beyond the tower’s certified collapse area. 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. Not applicable – site is unimproved, and there is no known or proposed dredging/filling. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: 3.C.f Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved? Yes. The circumstances particular to the location and the structure are unique. The Property is rectangular, and the proposed structure is unique (a 250’ tall essential services communications tower). The proposed tower meets the separation requirement with respect to the northern and southern boundaries. The eastern and western boundaries meet the LDC’s “certified collapse area” measurement, and the nearest structures are approximately 250’ away from the Property’s perimeter. The certified collapse area is an alternative measurement provided in the LDC to ensure safety of nearby property and structures. This unique set of circumstances is peculiar to this Property and proposed structure. Additionally, the County’s code was written in 2005, and recent technological advances have made it possible to design communications towers that can withstand hurricane force winds. In the “highly unlikely” event of a structural failure, the proposed tower will be designed and built to buckle and fall within a 100’ x 100’ compound (see Nov. 18, 2019 Certified Collapse Area letter included with this submittal). b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. Yes. While the Property is large enough to safely accommodate the proposed communications tower, its rectangular shape makes it necessary to obtain a variance to meet LDC separation requirements for the eastern and western boundaries. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. Yes. The proposed tower is a permitted use at this location that will accommodate critically important essential services communications. Applicant has demonstrated, through an engineer’s certification, that the proposed structure is designed to meet the underlying purpose of the separation requirement (i.e., distance and safety with respect to neighboring properties). Without the variance, to enjoy the permitted use, the applicant would be required to substantially decrease the tower’s height and effectiveness for essential services communications. It would be an unnecessary and undue hardship to interpret the zoning code literally under these circumstances – particularly when the proposed tower meets one of two measurements specifically articulated in the LDC to ensure safety and protection of neighboring properties (i.e., the tower’s certified collapse area). d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. Yes. Applicant is proposing the minimum variance necessary to make reasonable use of the land and proposed structure. e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. No. The Applicant is not requesting and special privilege, and granting the requested variance will not give Applicant any special privilege that is denied to other property in this zoning district. Communications towers of this height are a permitted use in this zoning district, and the tower is designed to withstand 3.C.f Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) hurricane force winds, and to buckle within a 100’ x 100’ collapse area, in the highly unlikely event of a total structural failure. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Yes. The location and nature of the proposed variance meets the intent and purpose of the LDC separation requirement at issue: i.e., the safety of neighboring property and structures. The tower will not be injurious or detrimental to the neighborhood or to the public, and in the unlikely event of structural failure, the tower is designed to fall within a 100’ x 100’ certified collapse area. The outside perimeter of the certified collapse area is located a considerable distance from neighboring land boundaries (46.0’ to the western boundary; 24.7’ to the eastern boundary), and several hundred feet from any neighboring structure. The tower will provide a benefit to the public, and is designed to prevent any detrimental impacts. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. Essential public services communications towers are critically important in this fairly remote area of the County. Population in this area is less dense than urban areas, and communications at this location can be challenging in storm and other emergency events. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Yes. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Aug 18, 2020 Collier County, FL Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Dr Naples, FL 34104 RE: Review Comment Letter RV2 Cover Letter: Variance -PL20190002701; Kapok St Cell Tower To whom it may concern, Please see the below Review Comment Letter dated July 30, 2020. Based on the recommendation from Timothy Finn, I will provide an answer to each comment in the Review Comment Letter detailing our response and answer to the requested changes that goes along with the additional documentation being provided. My comments will be in red so that they will be easy to distinguish from the comments from the reviewers. July 30, 2020 Kendal Lotze Ignite Wireless 102 Mary Alice Park Rd Cumming, GA 30040 RE: Variance -PL20190002701; Kapok St Cell Tower Dear Mr. Lotze: The following comments regarding the above referenced project that was submitted on 7-1-20, are being provided as requested. Please be aware that this is not a comprehensive list and is only being provided as a courtesy. All reviews must be completed prior to resubmittal. Rejected Review: Zoning Review; Reviewed By: Timothy Finn 1. REV 2: The parcel number that is illustrated is 00308760002, which is incorrect. Please revise the parcel to 00307840002. This has been corrected on the document named ( Kapok_Owner Affidavit of Authorization_Updated_8.4.2020 ) . REV 1: Affidavit of Authorization - Provide the petition number (PL20190002701) and revise the parcel number to 00307840002. Please delete references of Kendal Lotze/Ignite Wireless as this affidavit of authorization only authorizes the property owner (Johannes Steffens) to give consent to the contract purchaser (CitySwitch II, LLC) to act on the property owners behalf. This has been corrected on the document named ( Kapok_Owner Affidavit of Authorization_Updated_8.4.2020 ). 2. The Zoning Drawings (Sheet C-1) setbacks do not match the Project Narrative setback numbers. In the Project Narrative & Separate Sheet responses document, in Section 1 it is explained that the applicant is seeking a variance from the required 125’ separation requirement, to allow (1) for the eastern boundary, a separation of 60’ (65’ less than required); and (2) for the western boundary, a separation of 82’ (43’ less than required). However, in the Zoning Drawings, Sheet Number C-1, the western setback is illustrated at 96'-2" and the eastern setback is 3.C.f Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) illustrated at 74'-5". Please revise these setback numbers for both documents to be consistent with each other. This has been corrected on the drawings named ( Kapok Street - FLC009 - Zoning - Rev 2 - 8_5_20 ) and it now correctly matches the Project Narrative & Separate Sheet response document. 3. Pursuant to LDC 5.05.09(D)(E) and (F) for shared tower use, please demonstrate that either you can or can not work an arrangement for a shared tower use? Please see the Collier County Communication Towers Map as Towers 1 and 18 are in proximity to the Kapok St Cell Tower property. Moreover, there is a Site Development Plan (SDP) application (PL20200000886) for a proposed cell tower to be located at 550 Frangipani Avenue located approximately 2065 feet to the east of the Kapok St Cell Tower property. Please explain why you can't share this tower? This has been addressed in the supplemental attached document named ( Kapok_RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENT_8.4.2020 ). Rejected Review: County Attorney Review; Reviewed By: Sally Ashkar 1. Your application states that the applicant is CitySwitch II, LLC, while the affidavits of authorization state that the applicant is CitySwitch II-A LLC. Which is correct? They both appear to be active companies. Please reconcile and update the affidavits or application. CitySwitch II-A, LLC is the correct applicant company and this has been corrected on the application named ( Kapok_Variance Application_Revised_8.18.2020 ). 2. What role does J&J Wireless Consultants have in this application? If they are an additional agent, they should be listed on the application in addition to Ignite. J&J Wireless Consultants, Ignite Wireless, Inc. and Jeff Wright are all agents of CitySwitch II-A, LLC. This has been corrected and added onto the application named ( Kapok_Variance Application_Revised_8.18.2020 ) and affidavit of authorization named ( Kapok_Affidavit of Authorization_New_8.18.2020 ) . 3. Please show the measurements in your cover letter for the proposed separation for the eastern and western boundary on your site plan. There appears to be some inconsistency between the two documents. The separation measurements should be accurately shown on the site plan. This has been corrected on the drawings named ( Kapok Street - FLC009 - Zoning - Rev 2 - 8_5_20 ) and it now correctly matches the Project Narrative & Separate Sheet response document. 4. Is City Switch leasing the property from Johannes Steffens or is it a contract purchaser? Please provide evidence of legal use of the property. CitySwitch II-A, LLC is leasing the property from Johannes Steffens. A redacted copy of the lease agreement is provided and named ( Kapok Street_Redacted Lease ). GENERAL COMMENTS: [Timothy Finn] 1. Additional comments or stipulations may be forthcoming once a sufficient application has been submitted for review. This correspondence should not be construed as a position of support or non-support for any issues within the petition. Staff will analyze the petition and the recommendation will be contained in the staff report prepared for the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) or Hearing Examiner (Hex). Acknowledged. 2. Please be advised that pursuant to the LDC, an application can be considered closed if there has been no activity on the application for a period of six (6) months. That six months period will be calculated from the date of this letter. Acknowledged. 3. Please ensure that all members of your review team that may testify before the Hex/CCPC and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) are registered as lobbyists 3.C.f Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) with the county pursuant to the regulations regarding that issue. Acknowledged. 4. When addressing review comments, please provide a cover letter outlining your response to each comment. Include a response to all comments. Acknowledged, all comments have been addressed. 5. Please put revised dates on all exhibits and in the title block of the Site Plan. The PUD document should include a footer that reflects the project name, petition number, date and page X of Y for the entire document. Documents without this information will be rejected. Acknowledged, all revised documents and drawings have dates. 6. A partial resubmittal cannot be accepted; please do not resubmit until you can respond to ALL review comments. Acknowledged. 7. Note the adopted fee schedule requires payment of additional fees for petitions that require more than four resubmittals; please contact the appropriate staff and resolve issues to avoid this fee. Acknowledged. Timothy Finn, AICP Principal Planner Cc: Kendal Lotze, Ignite Wireless, Sally Ashkar       3.C.f Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) VARIANCE PETITIION APPLICATION (PL20190002701)  KAPOK STREET, NAPLES, FL 34117  PARCEL ID# 00307840002  RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENT: TIMOTHY FINN #3  Staff comment:  Pursuant to LDC 5.05.09(D)(E) and (F) for shared tower use, please demonstrate that either you can or can not  work an arrangement for a shared tower use? Please see the Collier County Communication Towers Map as  Towers 1 and 18 are in proximity to the Kapok St Cell Tower property. Moreover, there is an Site Development  Plan (SDP) application (PL20200000886) for a proposed cell tower to be located at 550 Frangipani Avenue located  approximately 2065 feet to the east of the Kapok St Cell Tower property. Please explain why you can't share this  tower?  Response:  While we would consider any offer for another entity/provider to share the proposed tower on Kapok St., we are  not aware of any other towers that would provide necessary and adequate capacity and geographic coverage area  to achieve our objectives, and sharing another tower at another location is not a feasible option.  To our  knowledge, there is no applicable separation requirement with respect to a tower at the Kapok St. location relative  to other towers in the vicinity.  As to the SDP application (PL20200000886) referenced in the staff comment, which relates to a proposed 185’  tower over 2,000 feet away from the proposed Kapok St. tower, that application was submitted on 7/27/2020,  according to the County’s website.  The proposed Kapok St. tower is 250’, over 1/3 higher than the tower if the  application referenced by staff.  While the application for PL20200000886 was submitted on July 27, 2020, in the case of the Kapok St. Tower, a  preapplication meeting was first held November 12, 2019.  As a result of that meeting, applicant prepared a  variance application, and a second pre‐application meeting was held on December 4, 2019 for the variance.  At the  December 4, 2019 pre‐application meeting, applicant was advised (in error) that the tower use was not allowed by  right, and that a conditional use would be required.  Following a subsequent application for zoning interpretation, on March 17, 2020, staff formally determined the  use was a permitted use at this location, and that a conditional use was not required, but reiterated that a variance  would be necessary.  Applicant has since filed the variance application that is presently under review.    Applicant first formally requested approval requirements for the tower in August 2019 (see ZLTR‐PL20190001999),  and has been diligently pursuing approval of the tower since then. Applicant has engaged in sincere, costly, and  diligent efforts over the past 11 months.  This has included two pre‐application meetings, two ZVL’s, and  uncertainty created by erroneous “conditional use” instruction. Given Applicant’s significant efforts, the lack of any  codified tower separation requirement, the lack of any record of any tower application being filed until 7/27/2020,  and the significant investment incurred to date, it is appropriate for Applicant to move forward with its plans at  this location, which have been a matter of public record for almost a year.  Concurrent with these efforts, Applicant notified the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) of its plans, and the  FAA issued a formal “Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation” on October 23, 2019 for the proposed Kapok  St. tower.  FAA notification is the industry standard for putting other would‐be tower owners on notice that there  is a tower application pending. The tower application referenced by staff (PL20200000886) has not, to our  knowledge, registered with or received any such determination from the FAA.  Date: 8.4.20203.C.f Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Digitally signed by Dennis Abel Date: 2020.08.05 08:27:46 -04'00' 3.C.f Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) KAPOK STREET 12906066 NW 1/4, SEC. 15, T-49-S, R-27-E COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RAWLAND TOWER SURVEYPROJECT NO.19-1586 SMW Engineering Group, Inc.FDH-NC158 Business Center DriveBirmingham, Alabama 35244Ph: 205-252-6985www.smweng.com3.C.f Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) NW 1/4, SEC. 15, T-49-S, R-27-E COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RAWLAND TOWER SURVEYPROJECT NO.19-1586 SMW Engineering Group, Inc.SECTION OVERVIEW NOT TO SCALE FDH-NC158 Business Center DriveBirmingham, Alabama 35244Ph: 205-252-6985www.smweng.comKAPOK STREET 12906066 3.C.f Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) NW 1/4, SEC. 15, T-49-S, R-27-E COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RAWLAND TOWER SURVEYPROJECT NO.19-1586 SMW Engineering Group, Inc.PARENT TRACT OVERVIEW NOT TO SCALE FDH-NC158 Business Center DriveBirmingham, Alabama 35244Ph: 205-252-6985www.smweng.com’’ KAPOK STREET 12906066 3.C.f Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Digitally signed by Dennis Abel Date: 2020.08.05 08:28:09 -04'00' 3.C.f Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Digitally signed by Dennis Abel Date: 2020.08.05 08:28:21 -04'00' 3.C.f Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Digitally signed by Dennis Abel Date: 2020.08.05 08:28:34 -04'00' 3.C.f Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Digitally signed by Dennis Abel Date: 2020.08.05 08:28:50 -04'00' 3.C.f Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Digitally signed by Dennis Abel Date: 2020.08.05 08:29:07 -04'00' 3.C.f Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) KAPOK STREET12906066NW 1/4, SEC. 15, T-49-S, R-27-ECOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDARAWLAND TOWER SURVEY PROJECT NO.19-1586SMW Engineering Group, Inc. FDH-NC158 Business Center Drive Birmingham, Alabama 35244 Ph: 205-252-6985www.smweng.com 3.C.fPacket Pg. 200Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) NW 1/4, SEC. 15, T-49-S, R-27-ECOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDARAWLAND TOWER SURVEY PROJECT NO.19-1586SMW Engineering Group, Inc.SECTION OVERVIEWNOT TO SCALEFDH-NC158 Business Center Drive Birmingham, Alabama 35244 Ph: 205-252-6985www.smweng.comKAPOK STREET129060663.C.fPacket Pg. 201Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) NW 1/4, SEC. 15, T-49-S, R-27-ECOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDARAWLAND TOWER SURVEY PROJECT NO.19-1586SMW Engineering Group, Inc.PARENT TRACT OVERVIEWNOT TO SCALEFDH-NC158 Business Center Drive Birmingham, Alabama 35244 Ph: 205-252-6985www.smweng.com ’’KAPOK STREET129060663.C.fPacket Pg. 202Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) June 22, 2020 BROWER ENTERPRISES LLC 5090 Tamarind Ridge Dr Naples, FL 34119 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the sender has made a formal application to Collier C ounty for a variance from the requirements of the zoning regulations as they apply to the following described property: [Description: Parcel Number: 00307840002. The E1/2 of the NW1/4 of the SW1/4 of the NE1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 15, Township 49 S, Range 27 E. in Collier County, Florida. ] It is our intent to ask the County to allow us to receive a variance for the setback distance required for the proposed communication tower on the aforementioned property. Additionally, the proposed tower is separated from surrounding property boundaries in all directions by a distance that far exceeds its certified collapse ar ea (i.e., it meets the lesser of the two distance measurements provided in the LDC, in all directions). However, because the proposed tower does not meet the greater of the two LDC distance measurements with respect to eastern and western boundaries, a variance is necessary. In order to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our intention, we will be contacting you directly within the next few days or you may choose to telephone the sender for further information. In any event, please be advi sed that we are interested in assuring you that our request should not adversely affect your property interest. Sincerely, Kendal Lotze, (770) 862-8089 102 Mary Alice Park Rd, Suite 505 Cumming, GA 30040 kendal@ignitewireless.com 3.C.f Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) June 22, 2020 Richard J Smith 380 Frangipani Ave Naples, FL 34117 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the sender has made a formal application to Collier C ounty for a variance from the requirements of the zoning regulations as they apply to the following described property: [Description: Parcel Number: 00307840002. The E1/2 of the NW1/4 of the SW1/4 of the NE1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 15, Township 49 S, Range 27 E. in Collier County, Florida. ] It is our intent to ask the County to allow us to receive a variance for the setback distance required for the proposed communication tower on the aforementioned property. Additionally, the proposed tower is separated from surrounding property boundaries in all directions by a distance that far exceeds its certified collapse ar ea (i.e., it meets the lesser of the two distance measurements provided in the LDC, in all directions). However, because the proposed tower does not meet the greater of the two LDC distance measurements with respect to eastern and western boundaries, a variance is necessary. In order to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our intention, we will be contacting you directly within the next few days or you may choose to telephone the sender for further information. In any event, please be advi sed that we are interested in assuring you that our request should not adversely affect your property interest. Sincerely, Kendal Lotze, (770) 862-8089 102 Mary Alice Park Rd, Suite 505 Cumming, GA 30040 kendal@ignitewireless.com 3.C.f Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) June 22, 2020 Johannes Steffens 542 Ethel Ave SE Grand Rapids, MI 49506 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the sender has made a formal application to Collier C ounty for a variance from the requirements of the zoning regulations as they apply to the following described property: [Description: Parcel Number: 00307840002. The E1/2 of the NW1/4 of the SW1/4 of the NE1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 15, Township 49 S, Range 27 E. in Collier County, Florida. ] It is our intent to ask the County to allow us to receive a variance for the setback distance required for the proposed communication tower on the aforementioned property. Additionally, the proposed tower is separated from surrounding property boundaries in all directions by a distance that far exceeds its certified collapse ar ea (i.e., it meets the lesser of the two distance measurements provided in the LDC, in all directions). However, because the proposed tower does not meet the greater of the two LDC distance measurements with respect to eastern and western boundaries, a variance is necessary. In order to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our intention, we will be contacting you directly within the next few days or you may choose to telephone the sender for further information. In any event, please be advi sed that we are interested in assuring you that our request should not adversely affect your property interest. Sincerely, Kendal Lotze, (770) 862-8089 102 Mary Alice Park Rd, Suite 505 Cumming, GA 30040 kendal@ignitewireless.com 3.C.f Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) June 22, 2020 ESTES FAM TRUST 18757 Aspesi Dr Saratoga, CA 95070 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the sender has made a formal application to Collier C ounty for a variance from the requirements of the zoning regulations as they apply to the following described property: [Description: Parcel Number: 00307840002. The E1/2 of the NW1/4 of the SW1/4 of the NE1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 15, Township 49 S, Range 27 E. in Collier County, Florida. ] It is our intent to ask the County to allow us to receive a variance for the setback distance required for the proposed communication tower on the aforementioned property. Additionally, the proposed tower is separated from surrounding property boundaries in all directions by a distance that far exceeds its certified collapse ar ea (i.e., it meets the lesser of the two distance measurements provided in the LDC, in all directions). However, because the proposed tower does not meet the greater of the two LDC distance measurements with respect to eastern and western boundaries, a variance is necessary. In order to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our intention, we will be contacting you directly within the next few days or you may choose to telephone the sender for further information. In any event, please be advi sed that we are interested in assuring you that our request should not adversely affect your property interest. Sincerely, Kendal Lotze, (770) 862-8089 102 Mary Alice Park Rd, Suite 505 Cumming, GA 30040 kendal@ignitewireless.com 3.C.f Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 210Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 211Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 212Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 213Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 214Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 215Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 216Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) RESCOM Environmental Corp. • P.O. Box 361 • Petoskey, MI 49770 Phone: (231) 409-2563 • Fax: (231) 487-0726 www.rescom.org January 2, 2020 Colleen Carroll Ignite Wireless, Inc 102 Mary Alice Park Road, Suite 505 Cumming, GA 30040 RE: FCC NEPA Summary Report for: Kapok Kapok St. & Frangipani Ave. Naples, Collier County, FL 34117 TCNS ID: 189171 Dear Ms. Carroll, RESCOM Environmental Corp has completed a NEPA Summary Report for the above referenced property. Based on the information presented in this report, the proposed project will have no adverse effect upon any of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Special Interest Items referenced in 47 CFR Subpart 1, Chapter 1, Sections 1.1301-1.1319. FEMA Flood Hazard mapping shows that the area is in a floodplain. All essential equipment must be installed at an elevation of 14 feet amsl in order to proceed without an additional Environmental Assessment. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this service and we look forward to working with you in the future. If you have any questions or comments, please call our office at (231) 409-2563. Sincerely, RESCOM Environmental Corp Andrew Smith Project Manager andrew.smith@rescom.org RESCOM File 19080047 3.C.f Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) TABLE OF CONTENTS Ignite Wireless, Inc FCC NEPA Summary Report Kapok NEPA Summary Checklist ............................................................................................... 1 Project Overview ............................................................................................................. 2 Regulatory Summary ....................................................................................................... 2 Area of Potential Effects .................................................................................................. 2 Historic Research ............................................................................................................ 2 Site Reconnaissance ....................................................................................................... 2 SHPO Consultation ......................................................................................................... 2 Tribal Consultation .......................................................................................................... 3 Wilderness Areas & Wildlife Preserves............................................................................ 3 Threatened & Endangered Species & Critical Habitats .................................................... 3 Designated Floodplains ................................................................................................... 3 Changes to Subsurface Features .................................................................................... 3 Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 4 Attachments A: SHPO Consultation ..................................................................................................... 5 SHPO Response ................................................................................................. 6 SHPO Submission ............................................................................................. 10 Form 620 ........................................................................................................... 12 Archaeology Report ........................................................................................... 40 Public Notice Affidavit ........................................................................................ 71 B: Tribal Consultation .................................................................................................... 72 Tribal Consultation Spreadsheet ........................................................................ 73 Final Responses ................................................................................................ 74 Notice of Organizations ..................................................................................... 94 C: Informal Biological Assessment & Maps ................................................................... 98 Informal Biological Assessment ......................................................................... 99 FEMA Flood Map ............................................................................................. 120 US Federal Lands Map ................................................................................... 121 National Scenic and Historic Trails Map .......................................................... 122 Wilderness Area Map ...................................................................................... 123 US Fish and Wildlife Service Critical Habitat Map ............................................ 124 US Fish and Wildlife Refuge/Reserves Map .................................................... 125 US National Scenic Riverway Map .................................................................. 126 Native American Reservation Map ................................................................... 127 3.C.f Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) NEPA/NHPA SCREENING CHECKLIST Ignite Wireless, Inc FCC NEPA Summary Report Kapok Project Type: ☒ New Antenna Facility ☐ Modification of Existing Facility Site Type: ☒ FCC Tower Structure ☐ Utility Structure ☐ Other Non-Tower Structure Site ID: Kapok Location: Kapok St. & Frangipani Ave. Naples, Collier County, FL 34117 Will the facility be located in an officially designated wilderness area, per 47 CFR §1.1307(a)(1)? Yes ☐ No ☒ N/A ☐ Consulting Agency To Contact: NPS, USFWS & BLM Comments: See attached documentation Will the facility be located in a designated wilderness preserve, per 47 CFR §1.1307(a)(2)? Yes ☐ No ☒ N/A ☐ Consulting Agency To Contact: NPS, USFS & BLM Comments: See attached documentation Will the facility affect listed or proposed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats; or jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed endangered or threatened species or likely to result in the destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitats, as determined by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, per 47 CFR §1.1307(a)(3)? Yes ☐ No ☒ N/A ☐ Consulting Agency To Contact: USFWS & State Equivalent Comments: See attached documentation Will the facility affect districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture, that are listed, or are eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, per 47 CFR §1.1307(a)(4)? Yes ☐ No ☒ N/A ☐ Consulting Agency To Contact: SHPO, THPO & NHOs Comments: See attached documentation Will the facility affect Indian religious sites, per 47 CFR §1.1307(a)(5)? Yes ☐ No ☒ N/A ☐ Consulting Agency To Contact: THPO, NHOs & Bureau of Indian Affairs Comments: See attached documentation Will the facility be located in a floodplain, per 47 CFR §1.1307(a)(6)? Yes ☐ No ☒ N/A ☐ Consulting Agency To Contact: FEMA Comments: See attached documentation Will the facility involve a significant change in surface features, per 47 CFR §1.1307(a)(7)? Yes ☐ No ☒ N/A ☐ Consulting Agency To Contact: US Army Corps of Engineers Comments: See attached documentation Will the facility be equipped with high intensity white lights in a residential neighborhood, per 47 CFR §1.1307(a)(8)? Yes ☐ No ☒ N/A ☐ Consulting Agency To Contact: Not Applicable Comments: This category was not reviewed by RESCOM Environmental Corporation Facilities that may result in human exposure to radiofrequency radiation in excess of the applicable safety standards specified in 47 CFR §1.1307 (b). Yes ☐ No ☒ N/A ☐ Consulting Agency To Contact: Not Applicable Comments: This category was not reviewed by RESCOM Environmental Corporation Preparer certifies that to the best of their knowledge the above information is accurate Prepared By: Company: RESCOM Environmental (Print name): Andrew Smith Date: January 2, 2020 3.C.f Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) NEPA SUMMARY REVIEW Ignite Wireless, Inc FCC NEPA Summary Report Kapok PROJECT OVERVIEW: RESCOM Environmental completed a NEPA Summary for the above referenced project to determine potential affects to Special Interest Items 1-9 listed in 47 CFR Subpart 1, Chapter 1, Section 1.1307(a). This NEPA Impact Assessment was performed in consideration of 47 CFR Subpart 1, Chapter 1, Sections 1.1301-1.1319 and the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for the Collocation of Wireless Antennas (NPAC). CitySwitch proposes the construction of a 250’ self-supporting lattice style telecommunications tower within a 100’ x 100’ lease area. REGULATORY SUMMARY: Based on CFR 36, Part 800, Subpart B of the National Historic Preservation Act and the FCC’s NPA, new construction projects are required to be submitted for Section 106 Review to State Historic Preservation Offices and interested Tribal Groups. Additionally, based on 47 CFR Subpart 1, Chapter 1, Section 1.1306 (Note 1), construction of new telecommunications facilities requires a review of impacts to the following Special Interest Items: wilderness areas, wildlife preserves, threatened and endangered species, designated floodplains, and changes to surface features. AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS: Based on the height of the tower and procedures outlined by the NPA, the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for indirect visual effects is a 0.75-mile radius from the tower center. The Visual APE is largely buffered by residential development, mature trees and agricultural development. The APE for direct effects is limited to the subject property and leased areas. HISTORIC RESEARCH: State Historic Preservation Office records were reviewed to determine if any listed or eligible historic resources exist within the APE. Additionally, RESCOM reviewed the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) online database and Google Earth layer to determine if any listed historic resources exist within the APE. RESCOM identified no historic resources within the project APEs that required SHPO evaluation. Historic resource information and photographs are included within the SHPO submission in Attachment A. SITE RECONNAISSANCE: RESCOM Environmental completed a site visit to photograph the subject property, adjacent properties, and any present historic resources within the indirect visual APE. An archaeological survey was conducted as ground disturbing activities are associated with the proposed project and archaeological clearance was recommended (See Attachment A). SHPO CONSULTATION: RESCOM consulted with the Florida State Historic Preservation Office’s (SHPO) to conduct a Section 106 Review for the proposed project. RESCOM provided a cultural resources evaluation report for Section 106 Review to the SHPO on October 24, 2019, requesting concurrence of the “no historic properties” determination. RESCOM received a response from the SHPO on November 22, 2019 indicating concurrence of the determination of “no historic properties.” The SHPO consultation process allows additional consulting parties to comment on impacts to historic resources from federal undertakings. RESCOM consulted with the appropriate jurisdiction officials as well as a local historic preservation entity to seek comment on effects from the undertaking. Letters were mailed to these groups on October 9, 2019, outlining the proposed project and inviting them to comment on the potential for the proposed project to effect historic resources. RESCOM contacted the Naples Daily News and posted a “Public Participation” ad in the paper on September 14, 2019. The proposed project was described in detail and “questions, comments, and correspondence” were solicited from the public regarding potential effect to historic properties. RESCOM did not receive any response from the public concerning historic properties for this project. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) NEPA SUMMARY REVIEW Ignite Wireless, Inc FCC NEPA Summary Report Kapok Per the NPA, the applicant must allow a period of 30 days for the public and all consulting parties to provide comment on the proposed project. All requirements with respect to SHPO consultation are complete. See Attachment A for full SHPO details. TRIBAL CONSULTATION: RESCOM utilized the Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) maintained by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to identify any tribal entities with interest in the area of the proposed project. The FCC responded, assigning the project with TCNS number 189171. All tribal groups have either responded indicating no concern with the proposed project, provided an exclusion via TCNS, or been closed out by the FCC. Therefore, all requirements with respect to THPO consultation are complete. All Tribal consultation documentation is in Attachment B. All Tribes do request immediate notification should human remains or objects under NAGPRA become uncovered during construction. WILDERNESS AREAS & WILDLIFE PRESERVES: RESCOM reviewed maps published by the National Forest Service, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and Wilderness.net, and found no Wildlife Preserves, Wilderness Areas, National Grasslands, National Forests, or National Scenic Trails are located at or near the subject property. Additionally, no Wildlife Preserves, Wilderness Areas, National Grasslands, National Forests, or National Scenic Tra ils were noted during the site visit (See Attachment C). THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES & CRITICAL HABITATS: An informal biological assessment was conducted at the subject property to determine if habitats necessary to support listed species or critical habitats exist at the subject property and in the immediate vicinity. The informal biological assessment is based on visual observations of on-site conditions and general habitats as compared to data acquired from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Based on information obtained from the USFWS, habitats necessary to support federally listed threatened and endangered species do not occur at or in the vicinity of the subject property. Therefore, the proposed project could affect any listed threatened or endangered species. In addition, there are no designated critical habitats at or in the vicinity of the subject property (See Attachment C). DESIGNATED FLOODPLAINS: RESCOM reviewed flood insurance maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The subject property is within the boundary of a designated floodplain, however, project plans are being developed to ensure all essential equipment will be higher than 14 feet—1 foot above the mapped flood stage of between 12 and 13 feet (See Attachment C). CHANGES TO SURFACE FEATURES: RESCOM reviewed a digitized National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map compiled with data maintained by the USFWS. Based on a review of the NWI map, the proposed project will not fall within a designated wetland. Furthermore, the scope of project does not call for wetland fill, water diversion, or deforestation. Therefore, the proposed project will not cause a significant change in surface features (See Attachment C). 3.C.f Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) NEPA SUMMARY REVIEW Ignite Wireless, Inc FCC NEPA Summary Report Kapok CONCLUSIONS: Based on information provided by the applicant, information acquired by RESCOM Environmental, and the outcome of the SHPO, THPO, and Public consultation processes, RESCOM has determined the proposed project will not adversely affect any of the Special Interest Items 1-9 listed in 47 CFR Subpart 1, Chapter 1, Sections 1.1301-1.1319 and the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for the Collocation of Wireless Antennas (NPAC). All essential equipment must be installed at an elevation of 14 feet amsl in order to proceed without an additional Environmental Assessment. January 2, 2020 Andrew Smith - Project Manager Date Attachments: A. NEPA Regulatory Checklist B. State Historic Preservation Office Consultations C. Native American Tribal Consultations D. Informal Biological Assessment & Maps 3.C.f Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) ATTACHMENT A – SHPO CONSULTATION Ignite Wireless, Inc FCC NEPA Summary Report Kapok Lead SHPO: Florida State Historic Preservation Office Secondary SHPO (If Applicable): N/A Date of Submission: October 24, 2019 FCC E-106 File Number: 0008846179 RESCOM’s Findings: ☒ No Historic Properties in APE ☐ No Effect to Historic Properties in APE ☐ No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties in APE Date of Response: November 22, 2019 SHPO’S Findings: ☒ No Historic Properties in APE ☐ No Effect to Historic Properties in APE ☐ No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties in APE ☐ Adverse Effect to Historic Properties in APE ☐ Conditional No Adverse Effect: ☐ Other: 3.C.f Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 1 jill.mcdevitt@rescom.org From:Hall, Kristen D. <Kristen.Hall@dos.myflorida.com> Sent:Friday, November 22, 2019 4:13 PM To:jill.mcdevitt@rescom.org Subject:SHPO Review Comments for Kapok TCNS# 189171 SUBJECT: SHPO Section 106 Cell Tower Review DATE: November 22, 2019 DHR Project File No.: 2019-7264 Project Name: Kapok Telecommunications Structure: Cell Tower Site Address: Kapok Street, Naples, Collier County, Florida RESCOM Environmental Corp for CitySwitch Hello, Thank you for submitting the above-referenced project for our review in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the FCC Nationwide Programmatic Agreement. Based on the information provided, our office concurs with the finding of no historic properties in the area of potential direct and visual effects. We have also filed our comments on the FCC 106-E-file system. This email constitutes our official comments for this undertaking. We request that the following special condition regarding inadvertent discoveries be followed: • If prehistoric or historic artifacts, such as pottery or ceramics, projectile points, dugout canoes, metal implements, historic building materials, or any other physical remains that could be associated with Native American, early European, or American settlement are encountered at any time within the project site area, the permitted project shall cease all activities involving subsurface disturbance in the vicinity of the discovery. The applicant shall contact the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, Compliance Review Section at (850)-245-6333. Project activities shall not resume without verbal and/or written authorization. In the event that unmarked human remains are encountered during permitted activities, all work shall stop immediately and the proper authorities shall be notified in accordance with Section 872.05, Florida Statutes. Our office asks for digital copies of the survey report, Survey Log, and map of the project area, saved as separate PDFs. These may be submitted to our office via email or mail. We ask that future survey report submissions include procedure s to deal with unexpected discoveries (including the discovery of human remains in accordance with Chapter 872.05, Florida Statutes). Please contact me if you have any questions. Best, Kristen Kristen Hall 3.C.f Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 2 Historic Sites Specialist | Bureau of Historic Preservation | Division of Historical Resources | Florida Department of State | 500 South Bronough Street | Tallahassee, Florida 32399 | 850.245.6342 | 1.800.847.7278 | Fax: 850.245.6439 |Kristen.Hall@DOS.MyFlorida.Com | dos.myflorida.com/historical 3.C.f Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 10/30/2019 Section 106 New Filing Submitted- Email ID #4030124 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/16.7.1-RC/popup.php?wsid=db15eb292fd04ba2bbc02f1f9111308a-2785d1634f717d8d96ae33250b47a3…1/1 Section 106 New Filing Submitted- Email ID #4030124 From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:45 am To:section106@rescom.org The following new Section 106 filing has been submitted: File Number: 0008846179 TCNS Number: 189171 Purpose: New Tower Submission Packet Notification Date: 7AM EST 10/24/2019 Applicant: CitySwitch, LLC Consultant: RESCOM Environmental Corp Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: No Site Name: Kapok Site Address: Kapok St & Frangipani Ave Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Site Coordinates: 26-12-36.9 N, 81-36-0.7 W City: Naples County: COLLIER State:FL Lead SHPO/THPO: Florida Division of Historical Resources Consultant Contact Information: Name: RESCOM Environmental Corp Title: Architectural Historian PO Box: 361 Address: City: Petoskey State: MI Zip: 49770 Phone: 260-385-6999 Fax: Email: section106@rescom.org NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT USE OF SYSTEM, ABUSE OF PASSWORD AND RELATED MISUSE Use of the Section 106 system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws. Any person having access to Section 106 information shall use it only for its intended purpose. Appropriate action will be taken with respect to any misuse of the system. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) PCut on dotted line. Instructions Click-N-Ship® Label Record Electronic Rate Approved #038555749Thank you for shipping with the United States Postal Service! Check the status of your shipment on the USPS Tracking® page at usps.comSHIPTO:1. Each Click-N-Ship® label is unique. Labels are to be used as printed and used only once. DO NOT PHOTO COPY OR ALTER LABEL. 2. Place your label so it does not wrap around the edge of the package. 3. Adhere your label to the package. A self-adhesive label is recommended. If tape or glue is used, DO NOT TAPE OVER BARCODE. Be sure all edges are secure. 4. To mail your package with PC Postage®, you may schedule a Package Pickup online, hand to your letter carrier, take to a Post Office™, or drop in a USPS collection box. 5. Mail your package on the "Ship Date" you selected when creating this label. Priority Mail® Postage: From: To: Print Date:Ship Date:Click-N-Ship® Trans. #: Expected Delivery Date:usps.comUS POSTAGE* Retail Pricing Priority Mail rates apply. There is no fee for USPS Tracking® service on Priority Mail service with use of this electronic rate shipping label. Refunds for unused postage paid labels can be requested online 30 days from the print date. Carrier -- Leave if No ResponseUSPS TRACKING #$7.35500 S BRONOUGH ST # 4DR. TIMOTHY PARSONS9405 5036 9930 0147 0486 81ANDREW SMITH RESCOM PO BOX 5516 FORT WAYNE IN 46895-5516 9405 5036 9930 0147 0486 81 0073 5000 0053 2399PRIORITY MAIL 3-DAY™C0009405 5036 9930 0147 0486 81Mailed from 46895Total:475479934Expected Delivery Date: 10/28/190023TALLAHASSEE FL 32399-0250STATE HIST PRES OFF, ATTN: REVIEW ANDCOMPLIANCE062S000000031010/24/2019USPS TRACKING # : 10/24/2019ANDREW SMITHRESCOMPO BOX 5516FORT WAYNE IN 46895-5516Flat Rate Env10/24/2019 DR. TIMOTHY PARSONS STATE HIST PRES OFF, ATTN: REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE 500 S BRONOUGH ST # 4 TALLAHASSEE FL 32399-0250 $7.35 $7.35 10/28/2019 3.C.f Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) RESCOM Environmental Corp. • P.O. Box 361 • Petoskey, MI 49770 Phone: (231) 409-2563 • Fax: (231) 487-0726 www.rescom.org October 23, 2019 Mr. Timothy Parsons, Ph.D., SHPO Director Division of Historical Resources 500 South Bronough St. R.A. Gray Building, Room 305 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 Re: Request for Section 106 Review: Kapok Kapok St. & Frangipani Ave. Naples, FL 34117 TCNS#: 189171 Dear Dr. Parsons, RESCOM Environmental Corp is requesting a Section 106 Review for the above referenced project. Enclosed is an FCC Form 620 with attachments summarizing RESCOM’s findings. Based upon the observations documented within Form 620, it is RESCOM’s opinion that the proposed project will not affect any historic properties within the APE. A conclusion of “no historic properties” is recommended and we respectfully request your concurrence. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (260) 385-6999. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, RESCOM Environmental Corp Jill McDevitt Architectural Historian jill.mcdevitt@rescom.org Enclosures cc: RESCOM file 19080047 3.C.f Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) SECTION 106 CONSULTATION Applicant: CitySwitch Project Name/Number: Kapok QUICK REFERENCE Form 620 ................................................................................................................. 1 Information Regarding: Resumes ................................................................................................................. 10 Additional Site Information ....................................................................................... 10 Tribal Consultation .................................................................................................. 11 Local Government Consultation .............................................................................. 11 Public Involvement .................................................................................................. 12 Additional Consulting Parties ................................................................................... 12 Determination of Indirect and Direct APEs .............................................................. 13 Historic Resources in the Indirect Visual APE ......................................................... 14 Historic Resources in the Direct APE ...................................................................... 14 Photographs ............................................................................................................ 15 Maps ....................................................................................................................... 15 Determination of Findings ........................................................................................ 15 Supporting Documentation: Project Drawings ..................................................................................................... 17 Topographic Map .................................................................................................... 18 National Register of Historic Places Google Earth Map ........................................... 19 Florida SHPO Map .................................................................................................. 20 Subject Property Photographs ................................................................................. 21 Local Government Consultation .............................................................................. 27 Additional Consulting Parties Documentation .......................................................... 28 Archaeology Report ................................................................................................. 29 Tribal Consultation Documentation ........................................................................... 50 Resumes – Jill McDevitt and Andrew Smith ............................................................. 57 RESUMES 3.C.f Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 6 3.C.f Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 7 3.C.f Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 8 3.C.f Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 9 3.C.f Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) SECTION 106 CONSULTATION Applicant: CitySwitch Project Name/Number: Kapok RESUMES See Attachments for the resumes. ADDITIONAL SITE INFORMATION See Attachments for project drawings. Project Name Kapok Project Address Kapok St & Frangipani Ave, Naples, Collier County, FL 34117 Topographic Map Belle Meade NE, USGS 7.5 Minute Topographical Map. Project Coordinates Latitude: N 26° 12’ 36.9”; Longitude: W 81° 36’ 00.7” UTM Coordinates: Zone: 17, Easting: 440041, Northing: 2899107 Project Description Proposed construction of a 250’ self-supporting lattice style telecommunications tower within a 100’ x 100’ lease area. Access Road Description Access via proposed driveway off of Kapok St. Utility Lines Description Route to nearest power/telco on site. Additional Construction Plans / Impacts None. Impact Statement Minor ground disturbance to install footings and access drive. Present Land Use Existing grass and tree covered parcel. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) SECTION 106 CONSULTATION Applicant: CitySwitch Project Name/Number: Kapok TRIBAL AND NHO INVOLVEMENT See Attachments for supporting documentation related to Tribal Consultation. RESCOM utilized the Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) maintained by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to identify any tribal entities with interest in the area of the proposed project. The FCC responded via e-mail on September 6, 2019, indicating the following six tribal groups were forwarded information regarding the location of the proposed project: • Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma • Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida • Muscogee Creek Nation • Seminole Nation of Oklahoma • Thlopthlocco Tribal Town • Seminole Tribe of Florida The FCC assigned this project with TCNS ID: 189171. To date, RESCOM has not received a response from any of the above-mentioned Tribes. RESCOM will refer non-responding tribes to the FCC for final government-to-government consultation. All tribes do request immediate notification should human remains or objects under NAGPRA become uncovered during construction. LOCAL GOVERNMENT See Attachments for supporting documentation related to Local Government Consultation. RESCOM identified Mr. Timothy Finn, Planner for the Collier County Historical Archaeological Preservation Board, as the Certified Local Government contact with jurisdiction in the area of the proposed project. A letter was sent via regular mail on October 9, 2019, outlining the proposed project and inviting comments on the potential for the proposed project to affect sites or structures of historic significance. To date, RESCOM has not received a response from this contact regarding the proposed project. Any future responses will be forwarded to the Florida SHPO. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) SECTION 106 CONSULTATION Applicant: CitySwitch Project Name/Number: Kapok PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT See Attachments for supporting documentation related to Public Involvement RESCOM contacted the Naples Daily News and placed a public participation legal notice in the paper on September 14, 2019. The public notice read as follows: Notice of Initiation of the Section 106 Process: Public Participation CitySwitch proposes the construction of a lattice style telecommunications tower within a 100’ x 100’ lease area at Kapok St & Frangipani Ave, Naples, Collier County, FL. Members of the public interested in submitting comments on the possible effects on historic properties included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places may send their comments to Andrew Smith, RESCOM Environmental Corp., PO Box 361 Petoskey, MI 49770 or call 260- 385-6999. To date, RESCOM has not received a response from a member of the public regarding the proposed project. Any future responses from members of the public will be forwarded to the Florida SHPO. ADDITIONAL CONSULTING PARTIES See Attachments for supporting documentation related to Additional Consulting Parties. RESCOM identified Ms. Elaine Reed, President & CEO of Naples Historical Society, as an additional consulting party with interest in the area of the proposed project. A letter was sent to this contact via regular mail on October 9, 2019, outlining the proposed project and inviting this contact to comment on the potential for the proposed project to affect sites or structures of historic significance. To date, RESCOM has not received a response from this contact regarding the proposed project. Any future responses will be forwarded to the Florida SHPO. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) SECTION 106 CONSULTATION Applicant: CitySwitch Project Name/Number: Kapok DETERMINATION OF AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS (APE) APE for DIRECT EFFECTS The DIRECT area of potential effect is defined by the FCC’s Nationwide Programmatic Agreement as being “limited to the area of potential ground disturbance and any property, or any portion thereof that will be physically altered or destroyed by the Undertaking.” Potential Ground Disturbance or Physical Alteration Lease Area Access Easement Utility Easement Misc. Proposed construction of a 250’ self-supporting lattice style telecommunications tower within a 100’ x 100’ lease area. Utilize access via proposed drive off of Kapok St. Utilize existing power and telco sources. None. Based on the project’s scope of work, the APE for Direct Effects is limited to the tower area. An archaeological survey was conducted because ground disturbance will occur. APE for INDIRECT EFFECTS The INDIRECT area of potential effects is defined by the FCC’s Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA) as “the geographic area in which the Undertaking has the potential to introduce visual elements that diminish or alter the setting, including the landscape, where the setting is a character-defining feature of a Historic Property that makes it eligible for listing on the National Register.” Based on the FCC’s NPA, the indirect APE for projects involving telecommunications towers between 200’ and 400’ should be a 0.75-mile radius. Area of Potential Introduction to Visual Elements Direction Distance Geographic Area North 0.75 mile Buffered by residential development and mature trees. East 0.75 mile Buffered by mature trees and agricultural development. South 0.75 mile Buffered by mature trees. West 0.75 mile Buffered by mature trees. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) SECTION 106 CONSULTATION Applicant: CitySwitch Project Name/Number: Kapok HISTORIC PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED IN THE APE FOR VISUAL EFFECTS See Attachments for supporting documentation related to Historic Resources in the Indirect Visual APE RESCOM consulted the following resources to determine if historic properties exist within the indirect Visual APE which match the categories of historic properties which should be assessed for potential impacts. The categories for consideration are defined by the FCC’s Nationwide Programmatic Agreement as properties which are either: currently listed on, determined eligible for listing on, or certified by the SHPO/THPO as in the process of being nominated for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. AGENCY RESOURCE RESULTS NRHP Online Database – NPS Focus http://nrhp.focus.nps.gov/ None in APE NRHP Google Earth Layer http://nrhp.focus.nps.gov/natreg/docs/Download.html None in APE Florida SHPO Florida Master Site File Search Results Dated August 29, 2019 None in APE Based on the review of the above resources, there are no historic resources located in the APE for Visual Effects that match the categories for requiring assessment of potential impacts. HISTORIC PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED IN THE APE FOR DIRECT EFFECTS See Attachments for supporting documentation related to Historic Resources in the Direct APE. RESCOM consulted the following resources to determine if historic properties exist within the Direct APE which match the categories of historic properties which should be assessed for potential impacts. The categories for consideration are defined by the FCC’s Nationwide Programmatic Agreement as properties which are either: currently listed on, determined eligible for listing on, or certified by the SHPO/THPO as in the process of being nominated for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. AGENCY RESOURCE RESULTS NRHP Online Database – NPS Focus http://nrhp.focus.nps.gov/ None in APE NRHP Google Earth Layer http://nrhp.focus.nps.gov/natreg/docs/Download.html None in APE Florida SHPO Florida Master Site File Search Results Dated August 29, 2019 None in APE Based on RESCOM’s review of the above resources, there are no historic resources located in the APE for Direct Effects which match the categories for requiring assessment of potential impacts. An archaeological survey was conducted because ground disturbance will occur. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) SECTION 106 CONSULTATION Applicant: CitySwitch Project Name/Number: Kapok PHOTOGRAPHS See Attachments for Photographs. MAPS See Attachments for Maps. DETERMINATION OF FINDINGS Based on the review of SHPO and National Register databases and field reconnaissance performed, there are no historic resources located within the indirect Visual APE. Therefore, the proposed project has no historic properties located within the indirect Visual APE. Based on the review of SHPO and National Register databases and field reconnaissance performed, there are no historic or archaeological resources located within the Direct APE. Therefore, the proposed project has no historic properties located within the Direct APE. Based on the information provided in this report and the attached supporting documentation, RESCOM respectfully requests the Florida SHPO concur with our findings of “no historic properties” in the APE. October 23, 2019 Jill McDevitt – Architectural Historian Date 3.C.f Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) SECTION 106 CONSULTATION Applicant: CitySwitch Project Name/Number: Kapok SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 3.C.f Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Copyright (C) 2000, Maptech, Inc. Name: BELLE MEADE NE Date: 8/29/2019 Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet 5° W  3.C.f Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) NRHP Map 3.C.f Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 0047 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 3.C.f Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS KAPOK Photograph 1 – Subject property, facing north. Photograph 2 – Subject property, facing east. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS KAPOK Photograph 3 – Subject property, facing south. Photograph 4 – Subject property, facing west. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS KAPOK Photograph 5 – Adjacent property, facing north. Photograph 6 – Adjacent property, facing northeast. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS KAPOK Photograph 7 – Adjacent property, facing east. Photograph 8 – Adjacent property, facing southeast. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS KAPOK Photograph 9 – Adjacent property, facing south. Photograph 10 – Adjacent property, facing southwest. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS KAPOK Photograph 11 – Adjacent property, facing west. Photograph 12 – Adjacent property, facing northwest. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) RESCOM Environmental Corp. • P.O. Box 361 • Petoskey, MI 49770 Phone: (260) 385-6999 • Fax: (231) 487-0726 www.rescom.org October 9, 2019 Mr. Timothy Finn Planner Historic Archaeological Preservation Boa 2800 North Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 RE: Section 106 Invitation per the National Historic Preservation Act and the National Environmental Policy Act to the Certified Local Government: Kapok Kapok St. & Frangipani Ave. Naples, FL 34117 Dear Mr. Finn, CitySwitch is proposing a telecommunications project at the above address. Please consider this correspondence an invitation to comment on the possible effects the proposed project may have on sites or structures of historic significance. This correspondence is not an attempt to satisfy the local zoning requirements. Enclosed for your review is a copy of a USGS 7.5-Minute topographic map, property photographs, site sketch and a table of information regarding the proposed project. As part of our research, RESCOM will submit the proposed project for Section 106 review per the National Historic Preservation Act and the National Environmental Policy Act to the State Historic Preservation Office. In addition, a public notification was placed in the local newspaper to solicit “questions, comments, and correspondences” from the public regarding the proposed project. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to contact our office or contact me directly at (260) 385-6999. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, RESCOM Environmental Corp Jamie Cochran-Smith Archaeologist/Historian jamie.cochran-smith@rescom.org Enclosure cc: RESCOM file 19080047 3.C.f Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) RESCOM Environmental Corp. • P.O. Box 361 • Petoskey, MI 49770 Phone: (260) 385-6999 • Fax: (231) 487-0726 www.rescom.org October 9, 2019 Ms. Elaine Reed, President & CEO Naples Historical Society P.O. Box 201 Naples, FL 34106 RE: Section 106 Invitation per the National Historic Preservation Act and the National Environmental Policy Act to the Local Historical Society: Kapok Kapok St. & Frangipani Ave. Naples, FL 34117 Dear Ms. Reed, CitySwitch is proposing a telecommunications project at the above address. Please consider this correspondence an invitation to comment on the possible effects the proposed project may have on sites or structures of historic significance. This correspondence is not an attempt to satisfy the local zoning requirements. Enclosed for your review is a copy of a USGS 7.5-Minute topographic map, property photographs, site sketch and a table of information regarding the proposed project. As part of our research, RESCOM will submit the proposed project for Section 106 review per the National Historic Preservation Act and the National Environmental Policy Act to the State Historic Preservation Office. In addition, a public notification was placed in the local newspaper to solicit “questions, comments, and correspondences” from the public regarding the proposed project. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to contact our office or contact me directly at (260) 385-6999. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, RESCOM Environmental Corp Jamie Cochran-Smith Archaeologist/Historian jamie.cochran-smith@rescom.org Enclosure cc: RESCOM file 19080047 3.C.f Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) RESCOM Environmental Corp. • PO Box 361 • Petoskey, MI 49770 Phone: (231) 409-2563 • Fax: (231) 487-0726 www.rescom.org ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK & PHASE IA ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE FOR THE PROPOSED KAPOK TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER SITE IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. October 3, 2019 PREPARED FOR: Ignite Wireless, Inc. 102 Mary Alice Park Road. STE 505 Cumming, GA 30040 PREPARED BY: Eric Sanchez RESCOM Environmental Corp. P.O. Box 361 Petoskey, Michigan 49770 (231) 409-2563 RESCOM ID: 19080047 __________________________________ Andrew M. Smith, M.A. Principal Investigator 3.C.f Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 1 INTRODUCTION In response to a request from Ignite Wireless, Inc., RESCOM Environmental Corp., has completed a Phase Ia archaeological reconnaissance and records check for a proposed telecommunications tower site in Collier County, Florida (Figure 1). The project is located approximately 12-miles northeast of Naples, Florida at 26°12'36.9"N 81°36'00.7"W in the NE ¼ of the NW ¼ of Section 15, Township 49 S, Range 27 E, as seen on the as seen on the USGS 7.5' Belle Meade NE, FL, topographical quadrangle (Figure 2). The project area consists of a wooded and natural grass covered location and measures 100-ft by 100-ft for a proposed telecommunications tower site with a 351-ft by 30-ft access road to the north; approximately 0.50-acre in total (Figure 3). RESCOM conducted an archaeological records check via the Florida Master Site File and no archaeological sites overlapping the project area. Fieldwork was conducted on September 25, 2019 by Jamie Cochran-Smith M.A., Ball State University 2011 and Andrew Smith M.A., Ball State University 2010, Principal Investigator and Secretary of Interior qualified professional archaeologist, and required 4 hours of fieldwork. This report details the results of the records check and Phase Ia field reconnaissance and presents the conclusions and recommendations of RESCOM concerning any additional archaeological investigations. Figure 1. Location of Collier County within Florida. - Collier County 3.C.f Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 2 Figure 2. Location of the project area on the 7.5’ USGS Belle Meade NE, FL, topographic quadrangle. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3 Figure 3. Aerial photograph showing the project area and proposed work. NATURAL SETTING The project area is located in the southwest portion of the state and lies within the Floridian Section of the Coastal Plain province of the Atlantic Plain Physiographic Region (United States Geological Survey 2008). The landscape in this portion of the state also referred to as the Big Cypress region is primarily flat with elevation ranging from 5- ft to 30-ft. soils are typically poorly drained overlaying limestone, sandstones, and marls. Vegetation in the area consists of open scrub cypress, prairie grassland, pine flatwoods, and wetlands (Brooks 1981, Griffith et al 1997). Soil within the project area consist of Riviera fine sand, limestone substratum, 0 to 2 percent slopes (Web Soil Survey; accessed September 17, 2019). The Riviera Series consists of very deep, poorly drained, very slowly permeable soils formed in stratified sandy and loamy marine sediments. Riviera fine sands are generally located on broad, low flats, flatwoods and in depressions in Southern Florida Lowlands (USDA 2014). Prior to Euroamerican settlement the area was primarily covered in prairies and flatwoods, and though portions remain that way, particularly within the Big Cypress National Preserve, large areas have been cleared for development. Many aquatic as well as mammalian species would have been available throughout the prehistoric period. These species would have been representative of the mixed regional fauna and could have included any of the following: black bear, eastern cottontail, woodchuck, gray squirrel, fox squirrel, southern flying squirrel, beaver, raccoon, white-tailed deer, coyote, dog, grey fox, red fox, turkey, salamander, soft shelled turtle, common musk turtle, elegant slider turtle, garter snake, blue catfish, flathead, and several mussel species (Howell 1915). N Project Area 3.C.f Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 4 Given the environmental conditions of the project area and surrounding region, there is the potential for the project area to contain previously unrecognized archaeological sites. The following sections describe previous research conducted in and near the project area and provide a general background of regional prehistory. CULTURAL HISTORY Florida’s history is long and complex, extending back at least 10,500 years and possibly further. Among the many people who have shaped its past are historic tribes as well as groups with and without historic tribal connections, including prehistoric groups, European explorers and settlers, and others. Florida’s prehistory conforms well to what is generally known about the prehistory of much of the southeastern US with major cultural stages that include Paleo-Indian, Archaic, Woodland, Mississippian, Protohistoric, and Historic periods. For the purposes of this report, chronological sequences have been adapted from Bense (1994). Paleoindian Period (~30,000-11,500 BP) The Paleoindian period represents the earliest known occupation of North America by Native Americans. Paleoindian groups rapidly dispersed across a wide range of environments (Surovell 2000). These populations settled a dynamic landscape undergoing rapid climatic and environmental changes, which led to the retreat of the continental ice sheets northwards and increasing summer isolation (Haynes 1982; Shane 1994). It is generally thought that early Paleoindian groups were highly mobile, widely scattered, lightly equipped opportunists that lived in small, egalitarian bands (Drago 1976: 9; Fitting 1975: 38; Mason 1981: 82; Wright 1995: 50). They moved on a seasonal basis to more fully exploit a wide range of animal and plant resources while also in pursuit of large herd animals. Although subject to increasing scrutiny, the Clovis period is regarded by most archaeologists as the earliest, or at least one of the earliest, known occupation(s) of the North American continent by Native Americans. The original Clovis hypothesis posited that groups of hunter-gatherers followed the Bering Land Bridge into North America roughly 11,500-12,000 years ago and rapidly dispersed across the mid-continent. Their degree or magnitude of mobility is shown by the fact that fluted points (Clovis, Folsom, and others) have been discovered hundreds of kilometers from where the raw materials were procured and where they were supposedly manufactured (Tankersley 1990, 1994; Tankersley et al. 1990). One of the key problems with the Clovis hypothesis, however, stems from a dearth of evidence for Clovis occupation in those same regions where researchers would expect to see evidence of Clovis culture arise first and more fully (Dillehay 2000; Dixon 1999). This has led most archaeologists to consider other modes of mobility and regard the peopling of North America as complex and multidirectional. Even so, most arguments against pre-Clovis occupation place into question the reliability and consistency of radiometric dates, note the lack of a clear, widespread pre-Clovis stratigraphy and related material culture, and the cite the lack of corroborating data from other, interdisciplinary 3.C.f Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 5 studies (Hofman 1989: 26). Currently, there is no evidence for possible pre-Clovis occupations in Florida. Clovis Complexes/Early Paleoindian (ca. 11,500-11,000 BP) Paleoindian settlement-subsistence strategies responded to environmental changes that characterize the Late Pleistocene. Although Paleoindian settlement patterns are poorly understood, Tankersley (1994:11) argues that such patterns shifted from landforms with relatively low relief and open habitats to landforms characterized by more rugged terrain and closed habitats. He has proposed an Early Paleoindian specialized hunter settlement model based on the recognition of big game-related and lithic procurement-related activities. Specifically, Early Paleoindian sites appear restricted to areas that attracted and concentrated large migrating herd mammals, which included shallow river crossings, kettle lakes, saline springs, marshes, sinkhole ponds, and sandy terraces of major streams that created open vegetation patches. Also, they may be concentrated along overlooks (e.g., crests of moraines) of riverine (aquatic and wetland) habitats and in proximity to lithic outcrops (i.e., in the glaciated regions, lithic resources occur primarily in various unconsolidated secondary deposits). It is generally thought that Early Paleoindian groups were highly mobile (nomadic), widely scattered, lightly equipped opportunists that lived in small egalitarian bands (Dragoo 1976:9; Fitting 1975:38; Mason 1981:82; Wright 1995:50). They moved on a seasonal basis to more fully exploit a wide range of animal and plant resources while also in pursuit of large herd animals like mammoth and bison (Fagan 1991: 77; O’Brien and Wood 1998: 34-35, 39). Their degree or magnitude of mobility is shown by the fact that fluted projectile points (Clovis, Folsom, Dalton, and others) have been discovered hundreds of kilometers from where the raw chert materials were procured and where they were supposedly manufactured (Tankersley 1990, 1994; Tankersley et al. 1990). In Florida, the majority of Paleoindian points have been recovered along eroded deposits with little or no provenience data available (White 2002: 12). The specialized hunting of large migratory herbivore prey required a small, efficient toolkit consisting of bifacial and flake knives, a variety of scrapers, gravers, burin-like tools including wedges, spoke-shaves, drills, hammerstones, billets (made of antler, bone, ivory, or wood), blades struck from specially prepared polyhedral chert cores, and fluted projectile points that could easily penetrate thick, tough animal hides (Mason 1981:86; Tankersley 1990:9, 1994:96). During the time period of 11,000-10,000 BP, the eastern U.S. experienced a climatic shift from frigid, boreal-like forests to warmer, deciduous forests. This gradual shift to a warmer, wetter climate coincides with evidence of the earliest occupation of the Piedmont Plateau in Florida, particularly near the Fall Line, though full occupation does not arise until the Late Paleoindian period. Subsistence patterns remained focused on large mammals during the Late to Middle Paleoindian transition, which is clearly reflected by the continued persistence of utilitarian chipped stone tool technologies. Paleoindian components and sites in Florida are far more common than in other portions of the American southeast. Some of the most notable sites in Florida from the Middle to Late Paleoindian or Paleo-Archaic transitional periods in Florida include the Page-Ladson site in northwestern Florida (Dunbar 2014), the Vero Man site near Vero 3.C.f Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 6 Beach (Viegas 2011), the Devil’s Den site near Williston, the Melbourne site along Crane Creek, and the Warm Mineral Springs site near North Port (Purdy 2008), among others. No large kill sites have been identified in the state, though some isolated point finds may be interpreted as individual kill sites (Anderson et al. 1996: 61). Middle Paleoindian (ca. 11,000-10,500 BP) During the Middle Paleoindian period, the people inhabiting Florida began to settle in, particularly in places where food was abundant. Our understanding of these later Paleo- Indian cultures is, unfortunately, largely incomplete. A shift toward smaller, fluted points and unfluted lanceolates is evident from sites throughout the southeast, which likely indicates a shift in subsistence patterns as large game animals became increasingly scarce and people began to rely on smaller game. Paleoindian social structure appeared to be uniformly egalitarian. There is no evidence of social stratification found in the few burials that date to this period in the southeast. Ritual or ceremonial evidence from this period is even more scant and therefor difficult to interpret. Late Paleoindian (10,500-10,000 BP) The Late Paleoindian period is characterized by very gradual cultural change coinciding with the terminal period of the Pleistocene and the transition to a warmer, wetter Holocene climate and the start of the Archaic period around 8,000 BP. Earlier Clovis points were gradually displaced by the Beaver Lake, Mariana, and Cumberland points, and Hardaway lanceolates in Florida and denote the Paleoindian-Archaic transition. This change probably also reflects a shift in subsistence from mammoth and other mega-fauna, which at that point were nearly extinct, to hunting deer, and other mid-sized mammals exclusively. Dalton points also appear during the Late Paleoindian period, but their distribution, while exhibiting some variation regionally, encompasses nearly the entirety of the eastern half of the United States. Environmental changes more in-line with modern conditions seem to have brought about changes in mobility. Occupations during this late period are characterized by small, short-term camps and “disposable” or “expedient” tool kits, generally fashioned out of broken points and reflect systems increasingly adapted to foraging (Binford 1980). The location and exploitation of lithic and other natural resources likely played an important role in Paleoindian people’s decisions about where to establish occupations and mobility between these sites. An increasing reliance on local resources established a pattern of seasonal use and mobility that is clearly reflected in the Archaic period. Early Archaic Period (10,000-8000 BP) The Archaic period in Florida marks a subtle but increasingly obvious departure from the past and is largely associated with increasing sedentism, population size, and social complexity. It is also characterized by new and diverse lithic technologies and subsistence practices. Point types like Taylor, Bolen, Eva, Hardin and Palmer come into production, indicating new approaches to fastening and using these tools and weapons as evidenced by their notching. The introduction of the atlatl and dart certainly indicate 3.C.f Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 7 changes in hunting methods and prey. With the extinction of mega-fauna, smaller game like deer, birds, fish, turtles, and squirrels become dietary staples during the Early Archaic period, necessitating these smaller projectile points and darts. There is also a marked increase in the number of plant food processing during this period, as well as the additional exploitation of coastal resources. O’Steen’s research (1983: 68-69, 99) demonstrates that Early Archaic site density near the Ocmulgee river was highest in areas of greatest resource density and diversity, further promoting the link between populations and resources. Social changes followed on the heels of these wide-ranging climatic changes and new resource procurement strategies. The size and membership of groups may have fluctuated significantly during this period of intense ecological change, depending on seasonality and other factors. Bands of hunters-gatherers lived throughout Florida, following resources as they became available or were used up. The Russell Cave site in northern Alabama is an example of such an Archaic period, seasonally occupied campsite (White 2002: 26-28). The stabilization of the climate made for optimal conditions for the expansion of coastal ecosystems, which led to increased exploitation (and reliance upon) these resources. As Anderson and Hanson (1988) have noted, large drainage systems may have served subsistence/resource needs, while social interaction (ceremonial, formal and informal exchange, mating, etc.) may have operated along and across watershed boundaries. These findings paint a picture of incredible human (and non-human) interaction on a dynamic landscape. Middle Archaic Period (8000-5000 BP) The Middle Archaic coincides with the apogee of the Altithermal, or Climactic Optimum, which brought severe drought to most of the Central US and led to warmer, drier conditions in the Southeast. Forests in Florida shifted toward pine and away from oak and hickory, with those latter varieties receding farther north into the Piedmont Plateau area. Native Americans in Florida started producing stemmed points, including Morrow Mountain, Guilford, Benton, Putnam, Smith, and Stone square-stemmed points (White 2002: 28). Flake tools are common, as are ground stone tools (probably for plant processing). It appears, based primarily on lithic evidence, that Middle Archaic people became more settled than their Early Archaic predecessors, perhaps a result of reduced territorial movement. Stone tools become increasingly made from local materials, suggesting a preference for nearby resources. Likewise, subsistence strategies tended to favor hunting, gathering, and foraging of local resources. Despite the increase in sedentism during this period, there are no known evidence for long-term habitation in Florida during the Middle Archaic. Late Archaic Period (5000-3000 BP) The extreme conditions of the Altithermal began to diminish around 3500 BP, leading to widespread and often significant developments throughout the Southeastern US. As wildlife population became more robust within the previously parched landscape, groups adopted broad-spectrum hunting, gathering, and collecting. Around the same time, the character of prehistoric communities in the eastern US begin to change. Populations 3.C.f Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 8 become larger and trading became increasingly prevalent, notably in conjunction with the rise of Poverty Point in northeast Louisiana. Groups in the Southeastern US would seem to have started becoming even more seasonally sedentary as evidenced by a more intensive use of local, seasonal resources and the extensive reuse of earth ovens and cooking pits (Wyckoff and Brooks 1983: 15) even as riverine trade and a taste for exotic goods, perhaps facilitated by trade with Poverty Point peoples, was growing. Subsistence practices largely continued as they had from the Middle Archaic, with diversified medium and small game hunting as well as reliance on riverine and coastal resources and plant foods, squash, beans, and nuts. The decline of Poverty Point (~ 3100 BP) was probably felt in Florida, especially in the western part of the state, in the form of diminished trade, as exchange networks that had been built up throughout the eastern US diminished with the site’s abandonment. Artifacts associated with this period include large stone knives, darts, spear points with stemmed hafts, soapstone bowls and cooking slabs, atlatl weights, metates, and stone drills. Stemmed points (Stanley, Morrow Mountain, Guilford, Savannah River) replaced notched varieties, and cultural patterns between the Piedmont region and the Coastal Plain began to diverge. Late Archaic assemblages in Florida include Horr’s Island at the southern-most tip, Norwood along the Gulf Coast, and Mount-Taylor-Orange along the Atlantic Coast. The earliest evidence for long-term habitation appears during this period as well, in the form of oval-pit houses and larger wattle and daub structures. The dead were cremated and/or buried, though, as in previous periods, there is no indication of social stratification or status evidenced through burials. Shell rings (or shell middens) were a novel development among people living on coastal settlements during the Late Archaic, which were built up over the span of generations. These rings are usually formed from deposits of shell, bone, soil, and artifacts, which, in some instances, were over ten feet thick. While there is much debate over what these rings represent, there is at least moderate consensus among archaeologists that they were, minimally, places of daily habitation (Thompson and Andrus 2011: 315; Thompson and Turch 2009: 268). Another novel development in Florida is the production and/or exchange of pottery (Anderson 1995: 160). Pottery from this area is the oldest known example of prehistoric pottery in the United States. Early Woodland (3000-2000 BP) The Woodland period is generally associated with the fluorescence of pottery, agriculture, and social stratification. Early Woodland peoples in Florida appear to have continued with life as they had in the Late Archaic. House patterns remained circular, generally arranged around a plaza. Subsistence was still largely based on small to medium-sized game and foraging/gathering, though evidence for early horticulture dates to this period. Some traditions were modified, such as ceramic bowls that were made with new tempers and occasionally decorated with fabric impressions or grooved patterns and designs. Projectile points like Big Sandy, Bolen, Neuberger, Wade, and Stanley types replace older Late Archaic types. Other facets of cultural life in the Woodland period appear to be completely new. Most notably, burials appear to have been accompanied by greater ceremonialism and, increasingly, the period witnesses the development of clearly elite burials accompanied by ceramics and other goods. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 9 Shell ring sites, which flourished during the Late Archaic, were abandoned in the Early Woodland, likely due to rise in sea level and flooding events. In the eastern US, the Woodland period is associated with the rise of the Hopewell Interaction Sphere. The Hopewell phenomenon is known from data collected primarily from the lower Illinois River valley and the Scioto and central Ohio River valleys of southern Ohio. The trends of the preceding time periods continue with increasing sedentism, population growth, horticultural intensification, and investment in mortuary ceremonialism involving stone- lined mound construction and a diverse assemblage of exotic ceremonial artifacts (Brose and Greber 1979). The Hopewell Interaction Sphere was vast, stretching from what is modern day Ontario, Canada to the Gulf Coast of Texas. To the West, Hopewell reached as far as eastern Kansas. Evidence of Hopewell influence is fairly abundant in Northern Florida. A more significant influence in the southern part of the state is the Pre-Glades culture. The Gulf Deptford phase along the Gulf Coast of Florida dates to the Early Woodland. Older yet is the Norwood phase along the same region as the Gulf Deptford. The St John’s Phase was located along the Atlantic Coast. Middle Woodland (2000-1600 BP) The Glades culture was the dominant cultural presence throughout southern Florida. Glades culture is a continuation of earlier Pre-Glade cultures, and its material culture is characterized pottery tempered with sand, grit, and grog and designed made using cords, fabric, and brushing (Bense 1994: 137-140). Lithics within the Carolinas and Tennessee show a shift from small, square-stemmed stone points to triangular, concave base points. Lithics within Florida remained stemmed triangular-blade points along with the Flint Creek types Mound building (including burial mounds) is also common to Swift Creek and other peoples in Florida and throughout the Southeast, much more so in Middle-Late Woodland and later Mississippian periods than in previous Archaic sub-periods (Dumas 2015). Other parts of the state exhibit different cultural spheres. Swift Creek culture dominated in northern-most Florida. In the Atlantic coastal region, the Middle Woodland is synonymous with St. Johns Ia culture, while Manasota culture characterized the Gulf Coast. Santa Rosa Swift Creek Culture could be found in the far western portion of the state. In each of these areas, Hopewell culture influenced both the structure of local communities, their burial practices, and even their investments in horticulture. Hopewell influence was pervasive and lasted well into the Late Woodland period. Late Woodland (1600-1200 BP) Populations (and settlements) grow significantly during the Late Woodland period and bow and arrow technology gains dominance over earlier atlatl technology—though it does not completely displace it until well into the Late Woodland. A number of cultural complexes arise in Florida at this time, including Glades in the southern part of the state, St John’s II along the Atlantic Coast, and Weeden Island along the Gulf Coast and into the eastern portion of the state (Bense 1994: 162-181). 3.C.f Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 10 Projectile points from this period reflect the transition to bow-and-arrow and are correspondingly thinner and smaller. Common point types include Broward stemmed and expanding stemmed types, Cooley contracting stem, Duval sub-types, Florida Copena Triangular types, and Yadkin and Leon types. A growing reliance on domesticated plant foods and horticulture does not displace hunting and fishing for food, but it does set the stage for Early Mississippian agriculture and a new social order that develops with and from it. Late Prehistoric/Mississippian Period (1200-400 BP) In the Eastern US, this period is described broadly as the Mississippian, and certain developments in Florida reflect local manifestations of Mississippian influence as well as resistance to that influence. The Mississippian Period is distinguished by the rise of chiefdom-level social organization in the mid-continent. These “emergent” Mississippian polities tended toward a highly integrated site-size hierarchy and ranked societies integrated into a complex socio-religious order and trade/surplus networks fueled by farming and surplus (Pauketat 2009). This period witnessed the revitalization and extension of vast trade networks of “exotic” goods vis-à-vis Cahokia, the largest and most influential of the Mississippian polities. Trade and migration extended to and from Oneota populations to the north and South and West into Caddo territories; Southeast into Gulf Coast Plaquemine, and Appalachian lands and East into Fort Ancient communities- a vast area known as the Southeastern Ceremonial Complex. Lithic production became increasingly specialized, crafted for optimum effect in hunting and warfare as evidenced by a vast range of small, triangular notched points and Ramey knives. To some extent, activities in Florida can be understood as local adaptations and change within a wider context of influence form the Cahokia polity. Early Mississippian cultural phases in the state include St John’s III culture along the Atlantic coast, Glades culture in far south Florida, Late Caloosa-Hatchee along the southern portion of the Gulf Coast, Safety Harbor along the remainder of the Gulf Coast, Cades Pond in central Florida, and Fort Walton in the eastern-most portion of the state. The earliest signs of a chiefdom in Florida are found on the Atlantic coast around 1150-1200 A.D, evidenced by small settlements with plazas and platform and burial mounds. Palisades and ditches are also found at sites in Florida’s interior, reflecting the need for security during a time of heightened warfare and competition for political dominance. Extensive trade networks brought exotic materials to Florida, and artistic traditions seemed to develop to a previously unknown level throughout the Mississippian world as a result. Projectile points, including ceremonial points that were highly decorative or made of exotic or delicate material, are found throughout the Eastern US, as are elaborately carved gorgets, pottery, pipes, and beads. Some objects, like beads, celts, and ornaments were fashioned from raw copper acquired through mining or trade. These items frequently served ritual or ceremonial purposes, and Native peoples throughout the Southeast frequently interred these goods in elite burials. Taken together, archaeologists regard these items and social developments of evidence of the Southeastern Ceremonial Complex (King 2018). Diagnostic projectile points for this period include Fort Ancient triangular blades and points, Jackson side-notched points, Madison and Mississippi triangular points, and Mouse Creek points. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 11 Locally, the Middle Mississippian phases are represented in Florida by the St John’s IIb Culture along the Atlantic Coast, Glades III culture in the far south, Caloosa-Hatchee III culture along the southern portion of the Gulf Coast, Late Safety Harbor culture along the remainder of the Gulf Coast, Alachua culture in the central portion of the state, and Fort Walton culture in the far western portion of the state. Late Mississippian cultural complexes include the St, John’s IIb culture along the Atlantic Coast, the Glades III culture in the far south, the Caloosa-Hatchee IV culture along the southern portion of the gulf coast, the Late Safety Harbor culture along the remainder of the Gulf Coast, the Lamar culture in the north of the state, and the Fort Walton culture in the far eastern portion of the state. Protohistoric Period (1513 A.D. – 1670 A.D.) By A.D. 1400, Cahokia and other Mississippian centers in the Eastern US began to falter. Overpopulation and internal political strife and instability coincided with soil erosion and depletion of nutrients in the soil from over-farming. The complex trade networks that had been developed were abandoned, and the power of elites increasingly depended on limited commodities rather than surplus. Evidence from burials in this period suggests chronic, deadly warfare in much of the eastern US. A combination of ecological pressures and upheavals within the alliance that linked them appears to have doomed Cahokia and other Mississippian centers. The vacuum created by Cahokia’s downfall presented new opportunities for some communities, and new centers rise up in Montreal, Fort Orange/Albany, Charleston, and elsewhere, permanently altering the patterns of exchange in eastern North America. The riverine trade system that had developed in the interior continent during the Mississippian gave way to one where goods arrived from and were directed to the Atlantic coast and, with the arrival of the first European explorers, Europe (Salisbury 1996: 449). Eventually, the Middle Mississippian economy turned away from maize surplus and toward trade in slaves, hides, beads, and, with the arrival of the very first Europeans, guns. (Beck 2013). When the first Europeans reached North America1, the continent's demographic and political map was in a state of profound flux, owed in no small part to the decline of Mississippian chiefdoms (Salisbury 1996: 449). The accounts of early Spanish chroniclers paint a picture of a mound building culture on the wane. Scarce accounts from the Ponce de Leon expedition describe pockets of plenty, communities surviving, even flourishing, against a larger background of warfare and illness (some of it brought on by Europeans), and food scarcity. Historic Period (1670-Present) European colonizers brought with them numerous tactical advantages, most notably guns and epidemic diseases (and their own immunity to them), that utterly devastated Indian 1 The earliest chronicles of Europeans in Florida come from the Juan Ponce de Leon expedition, which first reached the shores of present-day east Florida on April 3, 1513. The Ponce de Leon expedition had a profound and largely negative effect on Native communities in the southeast, and effect that would grow only worse with the arrival of European settlers. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 12 communities. They also brought ideological, economic, political, and military systems organized, in part, for the possession of Indian lands and the subordination of Indian peoples. By the mid-eighteenth century, the rapid expansion of English colonies (and imposition of British colonial laws) had replaced older traditions of exchange and alliance linking natives and colonizers nearly everywhere east of the Appalachians, driving many Indians West and forcing them into a scattering of politically powerless enclaves (Salisbury 1996: 458). The years leading up to and following the Revolutionary War were tumultuous for Native Americans, whose tribal leaders had, through a series of treaties and intertribal negotiations and conflict, largely (though not entirely) pledged neutrality during the war. Nevertheless, one of the first acts of the newly established Congress, was the creation of three departments of Indian Affairs. These departments were created to deal with what was already arising as the “Indian problem” in the purview of the newly established government of the United States of America, which included real and perceived interference with Colonial commerce, culture, and plans for westward expansion. The establishment of Arkansas Territory in 1819 included most of present-day Oklahoma until the Arkansas border was established in 1824 and then again in 1828 following objections from Choctaws and Cherokees. From 1824 onward, Native Americans were subject to the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, newly established as a division of the War Department. That same year, the Sac and Fox Nation and the Ioway Nations of Indians ceded their traditional lands in Missouri (7 Stat., 229. Proclamation, Jan. 18,1825: 207; 7 Stat 231. Proclamation Jan. 18, 1825). In the southern US, tribes had been nearly decimated by war with the federal government and with other tribes, leading tribes like the Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and others to give up their lands in surrender hoping to keep at least a portion of it. The Indian Intercourse Act of 1834 established the legal boundaries of “Indian Country,” (and eventually “Indian Territory”), which included modern-day Oklahoma, Arkansas, Kansas, Nebraska, and part of Iowa. The reservation ideology and subsequent system of land tenure and allotment and economic exploitation had developed over time, the wheels of which had been in motion since as early as 1790. Violence against Native peoples continued, politically (at both the federal and state levels), economically, and interpersonally, as pressure mounted to push Native peoples off dwindling Native lands. The response of Native peoples varied, some seeking peaceful relations with Europeans, others looking to leverage the instability fomented by European tactics, while others retaliated. Indian removal to the west had been part of American policy since the Articles of Confederation, but the 1830 Indian Removal Act marked a change from voluntary relocation, the Jeffersonian Ideal earlier in the century, into one of forced removal, or the Jacksonian Ideal (Chapman 1965, Washburn 1975). The Five Civilized Tribes purchased new lands in present-day Oklahoma, but some relocated farther north. All remaining Native peoples were forcefully removed that same year and relocated to reservations under the 1830 Act. The forced relocation of Native Americans to Indian Territory, marked by resistance, setbacks, dislocation, and incredible suffering and death, took decades to accomplish. The path of removal, which brought Native peoples from the eastern and southeastern US to Indian Territory, is known as The Trail of Tears (1830-~1850) (Foreman 1934; Bailey 1972). The conditions, consequences, and routes of removal to (or establishment within) Indian Territory and the 3.C.f Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 13 ceding of lands varied greatly from tribe to tribe. In Florida, this forced removal was largely marked by the three Seminole Wars, occurring from approximately 1817-1818, 1835-1842, and 1855-1858 resulting in great numbers of deaths and forced relocation of the Seminole people. It is estimated that only a few hundred Seminoles remained after these conflicts in the Everglades. The last, and one of the most devastating, forced removals east of the Mississippi was of the Cherokee in 1838, and an estimated 2000- 6000 Cherokee died on the forced march to Oklahoma (Thornton 1991). Florida’s role in the Civil War was less substantial than some other states, though there were some major effects. There were many smaller skirmishes that took place in Florida and only one large battle known as the Battle of Olustee. More significant was the contribution of goods, particularly food for confederate troops that came from Florida. This led to a blockade of the state and occupation of several Florida ports by Union troops to effectively stifle their ability to serve the confederate army. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS An archaeological records check was conducted via the Florida Master Site File on August 30, 2019 determined there are no previously recorded archaeological sites overlapping the project area or within a mile. Additionally, there are no historic structures or resources listed in the National Register of Historic Places or the Florida Master Site File database within the project area. METHODS Fieldwork was conducted on September 25, 2019 and recovered no artifacts. The project area at the time of the reconnaissance consisted of a wooded and natural grass covered location with no surface visibility (Figure 4). A pedestrian survey at 2-meter intervals was conducted throughout the entire project area in order to identify any cultural materials or possible prior disturbance. A shovel testing methodology was employed through the entire project area due to limited surface visibility. A total of twelve shovel tests were conducted in accordance with certain SHPO and Tribal methodologies (Figure 5). Shovel test intervals were determined based on the standards outlined by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Archeological Documentation. Shovel tests measured at least 35-cm by 35-cm and were excavated well into obvious subsoil. Soils from shovel tests were screened through ¼-inch mesh and exposed soil profiles were visually examined for cultural materials and/or evidence of buried cultural horizons. Shovel tests were backfilled upon completion. RESULTS No cultural materials or features were identified during the pedestrian survey or shovel testing. Soil encountered within the project area were consistent with the Riviera Series, a representative soil profile encountered consisted of an A Horizon of dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) sand very friable with moderate roots (0-14cmbs) over a subsoil of very pale brown (10YR 8/2) sand (Figure 6). 3.C.f Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 14 Figure 4. Photograph showing proposed tower location; note limited of surface visibility. Figure 5. Project area with shovel test locations. N Project Area Shovel Test 3.C.f Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 15 Figure 6. Photograph showing representative soil profile encountered in the project area. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS In response to a request from Ignite Wireless, Inc., RESCOM Environmental Corp., has completed a Phase Ia archaeological reconnaissance and records check for a proposed telecommunications tower site in Collier County, Florida. The project is located approximately 12-miles northeast of Naples, Florida at 26°12'36.9"N 81°36'00.7"W in the NE ¼ of the NW ¼ of Section 15, Township 49 S, Range 27 E, as seen on the as seen on the USGS 7.5' Belle Meade NE, FL, topographical quadrangle. The project area consists of a wooded and natural grass covered location and measures 100-ft by 100-ft for a proposed telecommunications tower site with a 351-ft by 30-ft access road to the north; approximately 0.50-acre in total. No cultural resources were discovered during the current survey. It is our recommendation that there are no archaeological sites eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places within the project area and we recommend archaeological clearance. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 16 REFERENCES CITED Anderson, D.G. 1995 Recent Advances in Paleoindian and Archaic Period Research in the Southeastern United States. Archaeology of Eastern North America, Vol. 23: 145-176. Anderson, D.G. and G.T. Hanson 1988 Early Archaic Settlement in the Southeastern United States: A Case Study from the Savannah River Valley. American Antiquity, Vol. 53(2): 262-286. Anderson, D.G. J. Ledbetter, L. O’Steen, D. Elliott, D. Blanton, G. Hanson, and F. Snow 1996 Paleoindian and Early Archaic in the Lower Southeast: A View from Georgia. In The Paleoindian and Early Archaic Southeast, edited by D. G. Anderson and K. Sassaman. The University of Alabama Press; Tuscaloosa. Pp. 55-70. Anderson, D.G., J. Ledbetter, L. O’Steen, D. Elliott, and D. Blanton 1987 Recent Paleoindian Research in Georgia. In Current Research in the Pleistocene: Lithic Studies, Vol. 4.: 47-50. Bailey, M.T. 1972 Reconstruction in Indian Territory: A Story of Avarice, Discrimination, and Opportunism. Kennikat Press: Port Washington, NY. Beck, R. 2013 Chiefdoms, Collapse, and Coalescence in the Early American South. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Bense, A. Judith 1994 Archaeology of the Southeastern United States: Paleoindian to World War I. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Binford, R. Lewis 1980 Willow Smoke and Dogs' Tails: Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation. American Antiquity. Vol. 45, No. 1 (Jan., 1980). Cambridge University Press. Brawner, T. 2014 An Overview of the Kolomoki Mound Site, Early County, Georgia. Central States Archaeological Journal, 61(1): 32-37. Brooks, H.K. 1981 Physiographic Divisions of Florida (map). Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida. Brose, D.S. and N. Greber, Eds. 1979 Hopewell Archaeology. Kent State University Press: Kent, OH. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 17 Chapman, B.B. 1965 The Otoes and Missourias: A Study in Indian Removal and the Legal Aftermath. Times Journal Publishing: Oklahoma City. Dillehay, T. 2000 The Settlement of the Americas: A New Prehistory. Basic Books: New York. Dragoo, D. 1976 Some Aspects of Eastern North American Prehistory: A Review. American Antiquity 41: 3-27. Dixon, J. E. 1999 Bones, Boats & Bison: Archaeology and the First Colonization of Western North America. The University of New Mexico Press: Albuquerque. Dumas, A. 2015 Woodland Period. The Encyclopedia of Alabama, Alabama Humanities Foundation. Electronic resource. http://www.encyclopediaofalabama.org/article/h-1166, accessed November 24, 2017. Dunbar, James S. 2014 The pre-Clovis occupation of Florida: The Page-Ladson and Wakulla Springs Lodge Data. Southeastern PaleoAmerican Survey - Clovis in the Southeast. Fagan, Brian M. 1991 Ancient North Americans: The Archaeology of a Continent. 3rd edition. Thames and Hudson, London, England. Fitting, J.E. 1975 The Archaeology of Michigan: A Guide to the Prehistory of the Great Lakes Region. Cranbrook Institute of Science: Bloomsfield Hills. Foreman, G. 1934 The Five Civilized Tribes. University of Oklahoma Press: Norman. Griffith E.G., Daniel C. E., Christine H.A., James O.M. 1997 Lake Regions of Florida. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Haynes, C.V. 1982 West Clovis Progenitors in Beringia? In Paleoecology of Beringia, edited by D.M. Hopkins, et al. Academic Press: New York. Pp. 383-398. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 18 Hofman, J.L. 1989 Prehistoric Culture History: Hunters and Gatherers in the Southern Great Plains. In From Clovis to Comanchero: Archaeological Overview of the Southern Great Plains. Arkansas Archaeological Survey: Fayetteville. Pp. 25-60. Kelly, A.R. 1938 A Preliminary Report on Archaeological Explorations at Macon, Georgia. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin. 119: 1-69. Kelly, M.W. 1995 A Phase I Archaeological Investigation of the East Fork Shoal Creek Sewer Interceptor Project, Clay County, Missouri. George Butler Associates, Inc. Lenexa, Kansas. King, A. 2018 “Mississippian Period: Overview.” New Georgia Encyclopedia. Electronic resource. https://www.Georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history- archaeology/mississippian-period-overview, accessed May 25, 2018. Mason, R.J. 1981 Great Lakes Archaeology. Academic Press: New York. O’Brien, M.J. and W. R. Wood 1998 The Prehistory of Missouri. University of Missouri Press: Columbia. O’Steen, L.D. 1983 Early Archaic Settlement Patterns in the Wallace Reservoir: An Inner Piedmont Perspective. Master’s Thesis, Department of Anthropology, university of Georgia: Athens. Pauketat, T. 2009 Cahokia: Ancient America’s Greatest City on the Mississippi. Penguin: New York. Pluckhahn, T.J. 2018 Woodland Period Overview. New Georgia Encyclopedia. Electronic resource. https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/woodland- period-overview, accessed May 25, 2018. Purdy, Barbara A. 2008 Florida's People During the Last Ice Age. Gainesville, Florida: University Press of Florida. Salisbury, N. 1996 The Indians’ Old World: Native Americans and the Coming of Europeans. The William and Mary Quarterly, Third Series, Vol. 53(3): 435-458. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 19 Shane, L.C.K. 1994 Intensity and Rate of Vegetation and Climatic Change in the Ohio Region between 14,000 and 9,000 14C YBP. In The First Discovery of America, edited by W.S. Dancev. The Ohio Archaeological Council: Columbus. Pp. 7-21. Smith, M.T. 2004 Understanding the Protohistoric Period in the Southeast. Revista de Arqeologia Americana, No. 23, Arqueologia Historica: Pp. 215-229. Smithers, G.D. 2015 The Cherokee Diaspora: An Indigenous History of Migration, Resettlement, and Identity. Yale University Press: New Haven. Surovell, T.A. 2000 Early Paleoindian Women, Children, Mobility, and Fertility. American Antiquity 65: 493-508. Tankersley, K.B. 1990 Late Pleistocene Lithic Exploitation in the Midwest and Midsouth: Indiana, Ohio, and Kentucky. In Early Paleoindian Economies of Eastern North America, edited by K.B. Tankersley and B. L. Isaac. Research in Economic Anthropology Supplement 5. JAI Press: Greenwich, CN. Pp. 259-299. 1994 Was Clovis a Colonizing Population in Eastern North America? In The First Discovery of America: Archaeological Evidence of the Early Inhabitants of the Ohio Area, edited by W. S. Dancey. The Ohio Archaeological Council: Columbus. Pp. 95-116. Tankersley, K.B., E.E. Smith, and D.R. Cochran 1990 Early Paleoindian Land Use, Mobility, and Lithic Exploitation Patterns: An Updated Distribution of Fluted Points in Indiana. North American Archaeologist 11: 301-319. Thompson, V., and F. Andrus 2011 Evaluating Mobility, Monumentality, and Feasting at the Island Shell Ring Complex. American Antiquity, Vol. 76(2): 315-343. Thompson, V. and J. Turck 2009 Adaptive Cycles of Coastal Hunter-Gatherers. American Antiquity, Vol. 74 (2): 255-278. Thornton, R. 2007 Ancient Roots I: The Indigenous People and the Architecture of the Southern Highlands. Lulu Publishing. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 20 1991 The Demography of the Trail of Tears Period: A New Estimate of Cherokee Population Loss. In Cherokee Removal: Before and After, edited by W. L. Anderson. University of Florida Press: Athens. Pp. 75-93. United States Geological Survey 2008 A Tapestry of Time and Terrain. Geological Investigations Series, I-2781. Reston, Virginia. United States Department of the Interior. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2014 Riviera Series Soils https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/R/RIVIERA.html 2019 Web Soil Survey https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx, accessed September 17, 2019. Viegas, Jennifer. 2011 Earliest Mammoth Art: Mammoth on Mammoth. Discover News. Washburn, W.E. 1975 The Indian in America. Harper & Row: New York. White, Max E. 20002 The Archaeology and History of the Native Georgia Tribes. University Press of Florida: Gainesville. Wright, J.V. 1995 A History of the Native People of Canada: Volume I (10,000-1000 B.C.). Mercury Series, Archaeological Survey of Canada Paper No. 152, Quebec. Wyckoff, D.G. and R. Bartlett 1995 Living on the Edge: Late Pleistocene-Early Holocene Cultural Interaction along the Southeastern Woodland Plains Border. In Native American Interactions, edited by Michael S. Nassaney and K.E. Sassaman. University of Tennessee Press: Knoxville. Pp. 340-361. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 9/6/2019 Proposed Tower Structure Info - Email ID #6403526 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/16.6.0-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-d51ac2341b49c4353b5a94792edcb…1/1 Proposed Tower Structure Info - Email ID #6403526 From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 1:20 pm To:tcns@rescom.org Dear Andrew Smith, Thank you for submitting a notification regarding your proposed construction via the Tower Construction Notification System. Note that the system has assigned a unique Notification ID number for this proposed construction. You will need to reference this Notification ID number when you update your project's Status with us. Below are the details you provided for the construction you have proposed: Notification Received: 09/03/2019 Notification ID: 189171 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: CitySwitch Consultant Name: Andrew Smith P.O. Box: 5516 City: Fort Wayne State: INDIANA Zip Code: 46895 Phone: 260-385-6999 Email: tcns@rescom.org Structure Type: LTOWER - Lattice Tower Latitude: 26 deg 12 min 36.9 sec N Longitude: 81 deg 36 min .7 sec W Location Description: Kapok St & Frangipani Ave City: Naples State: FLORIDA County: COLLIER Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Ground Elevation: 5.8 meters Support Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 82 meters above mean sea level 3.C.f Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 9/6/2019 NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWERCONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email I… https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/16.6.0-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-fc4962e1d5b6b397da8f9716b7e46…1/3 NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWERCONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #6404659 From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 3:02 am To:tcns@rescom.org Cc:tcnsweekly@fcc.gov Dear Applicant: Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the notification that you provided through TCNS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). We note that the review period for all parties begins upon receipt of the Submission Packet pursuant to Section VII.A of the NPA and notifications that do not provide this serve as information only. Persons who have received the notification that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally-recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively "Tribal Nations"), Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), and State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribal Nations and NHOs and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribal Nation and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribal Nations may have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission (NPA), all Tribal Nations and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribal Nation or NHO. (NPA, Section IV.F.4). The notification that you provided was forwarded to the following Tribal Nations and NHOs. A Tribal Nation or NHO may not respond until a full Submission Packet is provided. If, upon receipt, the Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort at follow-up contact, unless the Tribal Nation or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, Section IV.F.5). In the event a Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond to a follow-up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribal Nation or NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Second Report and Order released on March 30, 2018 (FCC 18-30). 1. NAGPRA & Section 106 Representative Fred Dayhoff - Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida - Tamiami Station (PO Box: 440021) Miami, FL - hopel@miccosukeetribe.com - 239-695-4360 - regular mail If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida has no interest in participating in pre-construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 2. Compliance Review Supervisor THPO Compliance - Seminole Tribe of Florida - 30290 Josie Billie Hwy PMB 1004 Clewiston, FL - THPOcompliance@semtribe.com - 863-983-6549 (ext: 12245) - electronic mail 3. Historic Preservation Officer Theodore Isham - Seminole Nation of Oklahoma - (PO Box: 1498) Wewoka, OK - tcns-sno@sno-nsn.gov - 405-234-5218 - electronic mail Exclusions: Please send all inquiries to email address: tcns-sno@sno-nsn.gov 3.C.f Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 9/6/2019 NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWERCONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email I… https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/16.6.0-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-fc4962e1d5b6b397da8f9716b7e46…2/3 If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma has no interest in participating in pre-construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 4. TCNS Coordinator Anne Edwards-Martel Ms - Muscogee (Creek) Nation - Highway 75 & Loop 56 (PO Box: 580) Okmulgee, OK - mcntcns@mcn-nsn.gov; section106@mcn-nsn.gov - 918-732-7639 - regular mail 5. Cell Tower Coordinator Kelly Nelson - Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma - 70500 East 128 Road Wyandotte, OK - celltower@estoo.net - 918-666-2435 (ext: 1861) - regular mail Exclusions: DO NOT EMAIL DOCUMENTATION; it will be deleted without being opened. Submit one printed color copy by US postal mail or other parcel carrier of all documentation to: Eastern Shawnee Tribe Attn: Cell Tower Program 70500 E. 128 Rd. Wyandotte, OK 74370 Provide a 1-page cover letter with the following information: a. TCNS Number b. Company Name c. Project Name, City, County, State d. Project type e. Project coordinates f. Contact information The Eastern Shawnee Procedures document is available and highly recommended for guidance; send an email to celltower@estoo.net requesting our most current copy. 6. Mekko Ryan Morrow - Thlopthlocco Tribal Town - P.O. Box 188 Okemah, OK - thpo@tttown.org - 000-000-0000 - electronic mail Exclusions: Thlopthlocco Tribal Town requests that all initial review materials required by applicable law be submitted by email directly to thpo@tttown.org. In addition, in the event archeological or cultural materials or human remains are discovered at any time during this undertaking, please notify Thlopthlocco Tribal Town immediately. The notification that you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning. You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to construction, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section VII.A of the NPA unless the project is excluded from SHPO review under Section III D or E of the NPA. 7. SHPO Lee Warner - Alabama Historical Commission - 468 South Perry Street Montgomery, AL - lwarner@mail.preserveala.org - 334-242-3184 - electronic mail 8. Deputy SHPO Elizabeth Ann Brown - Alabama Historical Commission - 468 South Perry 3.C.f Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 9/6/2019 NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWERCONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email I… https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/16.6.0-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-fc4962e1d5b6b397da8f9716b7e46…3/3 Street Montgomery, AL - ebrown@mail.preserveala.org - 334-242-3185 - electronic mail 9. Deputy SHPO Compliance Review Laura A Kammerer - Div of Historical Resources, Dept of State - 500 S. Bronough St. Tallahassee, FL - lkammerer@dos.state.fl.us - 850-245-6333 - electronic mail 10. Historic Preservationist Robin Jackson - Florida Division of Historical Resources - 500 S. Bronough Street Tallahasse, FL - Robin.Jackson@DOS.myflorida.com - 850-245-6333 - electronic mail TCNS automatically forwards all notifications to all Tribal Nations and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal. However, if a proposal for PTC wayside poles falls within a designated exclusion, you need not expect any response and need not pursue any additional process with that Tribal Nation or SHPO. In addition, a particular Tribal Nation or SHPO may also set forth policies or procedures within its details box that exclude from review certain facilities (for example, a statement that it does not review collocations with no ground disturbance; or that indicates that no response within 30 days indicates no interest in participating in pre-construction review). Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above have opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail notification. If you learn that any of the above contact information is no longer valid, please contact the FCC by emailing tcnshelp@fcc.gov. The following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: Notification Received: 09/03/2019 Notification ID: 189171 Excluded from SHPO Review: No Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: CitySwitch Consultant Name: Andrew Smith P.O. Box: 5516 City: Fort Wayne State: INDIANA Zip Code: 46895 Phone: 260-385-6999 Email: tcns@rescom.org Structure Type: LTOWER - Lattice Tower Latitude: 26 deg 12 min 36.9 sec N Longitude: 81 deg 36 min 0.7 sec W Location Description: Kapok St & Frangipani Ave City: Naples State: FLORIDA County: COLLIER Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Ground Elevation: 5.8 meters Support Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 82.0 meters above mean sea level If you have any questions or comments regarding this notice, please contact the FCC using the electronic Help Request form located on the FCC's website at: https://www.fcc.gov/wireless/available-support-services You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480-3201 (TTY 717-338-2824). Hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal Communications Commission 3.C.f Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 9/6/2019 Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID: 189171) - EmailID #6407713 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/16.6.0-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-a3bf6130902c92f5de1d5e1fbef3bb…1/2 Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID: 189171) - EmailID #6407713 From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:09 pm To:tcns@rescom.org Dear Andrew Smith, Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this email is to inform you that an authorized user of the TCNS has replied to a proposed tower construction notification that you had submitted through the TCNS. The following message has been sent to you from Cell Tower Coordinator Kelly Nelson of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma in reference to Notification ID #189171: The Cultural Preservation Office of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma requires the following information regarding all proposed FCC projects. DO NOT EMAIL DOCUMENTATION; IT WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT BEING OPENED. Submit by US postal mail or other parcel carrier all the following information for all telecommunication projects to: Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Attn: Kelly Nelson 70500 E. 128 Rd. Wyandotte, OK 74370 1. Provide a 1-page cover letter with the following information: a. TCNS Number b. Company Name c. Project Name, City, County, State d. Project type e. Project coordinates f. Total area surveyed in acres g. Contact information. 2. Professional cultural/archaeological resource survey report. 3. Aerial and/or USGS topographic maps showing general project location (small scale). 4. Aerial, color USGS topographic, or planimetric maps showing project area (large scale). 5. Project site plan map depicting labeled shovel test locations. 6. Shovel Test Log. 7. Site photographs. We request the opportunity to review and comment on scopes of work for projects whose purpose is to evaluate or mitigate archaeological sites discovered during a telecom project survey, and we also request to review the final reports for those projects. NOTE: The 30 day review period begins when we, The Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, receive ALL required documentation for the TCNS submittal, not when it is sent out. We suggest sending TCNS submissions with a tracking number to reference and confirm when we receive it in our office. The Eastern Shawnee Procedures document is recommended for guidance, send an email to Kelly Nelson at: celltower@estoo.net to request the most current copy. For your convenience, the information you submitted for this notification is detailed below. Notification Received: 09/03/2019 Notification ID: 189171 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: CitySwitch 3.C.f Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 9/6/2019 Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID: 189171) - EmailID #6407713 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/16.6.0-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-a3bf6130902c92f5de1d5e1fbef3bb…2/2 Consultant Name: Andrew Smith P.O. Box: 5516 City: Fort Wayne State: INDIANA Zip Code: 46895 Phone: 260-385-6999 Email: tcns@rescom.org Structure Type: LTOWER - Lattice Tower Latitude: 26 deg 12 min 36.9 sec N Longitude: 81 deg 36 min 0.7 sec W Location Description: Kapok St & Frangipani Ave City: Naples State: FLORIDA County: COLLIER Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Ground Elevation: 5.8 meters Support Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 82.0 meters above mean sea level 3.C.f Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID: 189171) - EmailID #6433723 From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 9:33 am To:tcns@rescom.org Cc:tcns.fccarchive@fcc.gov, THPOcompliance@semtribe.com Dear Andrew Smith, Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this email is to inform you that an authorized user of the TCNS has replied to a proposed tower construction notification that you had submitted through the TCNS. The following message has been sent to you from Compliance Review Supervisor THPO Compliance of the Seminole Tribe of Florida in reference to Notification ID #189171: We have no interest in this site. However, if the Applicant discovers archaeological remains or resources during construction, the Applicant should immediately stop construction and notify the appropriate Federal Agency and the Tribe. For your convenience, the information you submitted for this notification is detailed below. Notification Received: 09/03/2019 Notification ID: 189171 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: CitySwitch Consultant Name: Andrew Smith P.O. Box: 5516 City: Fort Wayne State: INDIANA Zip Code: 46895 Phone: 260-385-6999 Email: tcns@rescom.org Structure Type: LTOWER - Lattice Tower Latitude: 26 deg 12 min 36.9 sec N Longitude: 81 deg 36 min 0.7 sec W Location Description: Kapok St & Frangipani Ave City: Naples State: FLORIDA County: COLLIER Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Ground Elevation: 5.8 meters Support Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 82.0 meters above mean sea level 3.C.f Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) RESCOM Environmental Corp. • P.O. Box 361 • Petoskey, MI 49770 Phone: (260) 385-6999 • Fax: (231) 487-0726 www.rescom.org Jill McDevitt, MSHP Curriculum Vitae jill.mcdevitt@rescom.org Education M.S. in Historic Preservation, Ball State University, May 2013 Creative Project Title: Façade Rehabilitation and Improvement Grant Program for Albion, Indiana; Susan Lankford, advisor B.A. in History (minor in Mathematics), Saint Joseph’s College, December 2010 Professional Qualifications • Multiple years of historic resource research for National Register of Historic Places nominations and Determinations of Eligibility. • Experience in grant writing and management for a non-profit organization. • Proficient in Microsoft Office Suite, Adobe CS and AutoCAD. • Fully aware of cultural resources management laws and their applications. Selected Employment RESCOM Environmental Corp July 2018-present Project Manager-Cultural Resources Supervisor: Jamie Cochran-Smith, 260-385-6998 Conduct reviews of historic resources and prepare Section 106 reports for projects in multiple states. Evaluate historic properties for eligibility on the National Register of Historic Places as part of Section 106 Reviews. Coordination with SHPO and clients for review completion. Prepare Determination of Eligibility documentation for historic properties in Washington, Montana, Ohio and Colorado. ARCH, Inc. October 2016-March 2018 Executive Director Managed historic preservation nonprofit advocacy organization. Supervised staff, prepared annual operating and project budgets, conducted public outreach and oversaw grant writing, fundraising and event planning. Managed a historic rehabilitation construction project. Participated as Consulting Party in Section 106 Reviews, including consultation on resource identification and mitigation. ARCH, Inc. May 2013-October 2016 Historic Preservation Specialist Supervisor: Michael Galbraith, 260-469-3476 Conducted architectural field survey for Allen County Historic Sites and Structures Inventory including historic resource identification, documentation and assessment of National Register eligibility, researched and wrote National Register Nominations, a Historic Structure Report, and Historic Tax Credit Applications, Part I and II. Participated as Consulting Party in Section 106 Reviews, including consultation on resource identification and mitigation. List of Professional Publications available upon request 3.C.f Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) RESCOM Environmental Corp.  P.O. Box 361 Petoskey, MI 49770 Phone: (231) 409-2563 Fax: (231) 407-0726 www.rescom.org CURRICULUM VITAE ANDREW M. SMITH M.A. EDUCATION: Bachelor of Arts: Anthropology, Indiana University Fort Wayne, Indiana December 2005 Master of Arts: Anthropology, Ball State University Muncie, Indiana July 2010 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS:  Multiple years of experience in budgeting, planning and carrying out Section 106 compliance work.  Extensive experience managing staff for grant and contracted archaeological investigations  Coordination with lead agencies, SHPO’s, THPO’s and interested parties  Proficient in Microsoft suite of programs, Adobe CS, as well as Golden Surfer, ESRI ArcGIS 10.1.  Established history of completing complex projects.  Fully aware of cultural resources management laws and their applications. ARCHAEOLOGY AND RELATED EXPERIENCE: NEPA-Cultural Resource Project Manager at RESCOM. July 2014 to Present Supervisor: Joe Lee 231-947-4454 Completion and management of Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) and National Environmental Policy Act Assessments (NEPAs) for FCC projects. Site Files Manager at Louisiana Division of Archaeology. February 2014 to July 2014 Supervisor: Rachel Watson 225-342-8165 Review of site submissions and maintenance of archaeological site data for the State of Louisiana in both print and digital format. Use of ArcGIS platform to spatially represent archaeological data and datasets within the State of Louisiana. Interim Director at IPFW Archaeological Survey. June 2009 to Present Supervisor: Richard Sutter 260-481-6676 Experience from Phase Ia surveys to Phase III mitigations. Use and supervision of those using surveying equipment, GPS, aerial and topographic maps, digital cameras, as well as resistivity and magnetometer/gradiometer equipment. Management of up to 15 personnel and overseeing all paperwork and documentation. Extensive laboratory experience and report writing. Direct consultation with the state historic preservation officers, as well as INDOT and NAGPRA representatives. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) RESCOM Environmental Corp.  P.O. Box 361 Petoskey, MI 49770 Phone: (231) 409-2563 Fax: (231) 407-0726 www.rescom.org Staff Archaeologist at Ball State Applied Archaeology Laboratories (formerly Archaeological Resources Management Services). July 2006 to June 2009 Supervisor: Beth McCord 765-285-1834 Conducted field work and supervised personnel in the field and in the lab. Wrote technical reports. Participated in grant applications. Conducted research, fieldwork, labwork, and writing for grant compliance. Archaeological Technician at CDimensions. January 2012 Supervisor: Eben Cooper 972-881-5577 Worked two weeks during vacation from my permanent job to gain Forest Service archaeological experience. Phase I survey, including shovel testing and walkover and site recording in accordance with USDA NFS standards. LIST OF PUBLICATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST 3.C.f Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) ATTACHMENT B – TRIBAL CONSULTATION Ignite Wireless, Inc FCC NEPA Summary Report Kapok 3.C.f Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) TCNS #Site Name NOO Date Number of Tribes 189171 Kapok 9/6/2019 6 Tribe TCNS Response Second Contact Letter Date Referral Date 15 Day Closeout Letter Date Final Response Date Completion Date Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Requests additional information by mail 10/25/2019 12/16/2019 12/19/2019 1/2/2020 1/2/2020 Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida No interest if no response in 30 days NA NA NA NA 10/6/2019 Muscogee Creek Nation Requests additional information by mail 10/25/2019 12/3/2019 12/5/2019 NA 12/20/2019 Seminole Nation of Oklahoma Requests additional information electronically 10/25/2019 12/3/2019 12/5/2019 NA 12/20/2019 Seminole Tribe of Florida No interest if no response in 30 days NA NA NA 10/2/2019 10/2/2019 Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Requests additional information electronically 10/25/2019 12/3/2019 12/5/2019 NA 12/20/2019 3.C.f Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) andrew.smith@rescom.org From:Tiffany White <TWhite@estoo.net> Sent:Thursday, January 2, 2020 1:54 PM To:andrew.smith@rescom.org Subject:189171 Tiffany M White TCNS/106 Intake Clerk Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 918.666.2435 x 1862 IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail message is intended to be received only by persons entitled to receive the confidential information it may contain. E ESTOO.net may contain informatio n that is confidential and legally privileged. Please do not read, copy, forward, or store this message unless you are an int If you have received this message in error, please forward it to the sender and delete it completely from yo ur computer system. [M704NQ] 3.C.f Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID: 189171) - EmailID #6433723 From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 9:33 am To:tcns@rescom.org Cc:tcns.fccarchive@fcc.gov, THPOcompliance@semtribe.com Dear Andrew Smith, Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this email is to inform you that an authorized user of the TCNS has replied to a proposed tower construction notification that you had submitted through the TCNS. The following message has been sent to you from Compliance Review Supervisor THPO Compliance of the Seminole Tribe of Florida in reference to Notification ID #189171: We have no interest in this site. However, if the Applicant discovers archaeological remains or resources during construction, the Applicant should immediately stop construction and notify the appropriate Federal Agency and the Tribe. For your convenience, the information you submitted for this notification is detailed below. Notification Received: 09/03/2019 Notification ID: 189171 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: CitySwitch Consultant Name: Andrew Smith P.O. Box: 5516 City: Fort Wayne State: INDIANA Zip Code: 46895 Phone: 260-385-6999 Email: tcns@rescom.org Structure Type: LTOWER - Lattice Tower Latitude: 26 deg 12 min 36.9 sec N Longitude: 81 deg 36 min 0.7 sec W Location Description: Kapok St & Frangipani Ave City: Naples State: FLORIDA County: COLLIER Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Ground Elevation: 5.8 meters Support Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 82.0 meters above mean sea level 3.C.f Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 12/20/2019 Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification ofFinal Contacts - Email ID #25566 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/17.2.2-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-619167101dee44f39f3f9381259b05…1/5 Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification ofFinal Contacts - Email ID #25566 From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 9:02 am To:tcns@rescom.org Cc:tcnsweekly@fcc.gov T-Mobile Andrew Smith P.O. Box: 5516 Fort Wayne, IN 46895 Dear Applicant: This letter addresses the proposed communications facilities listed below that you have referred to the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) for purposes of contacting federally recognized Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively Indian Tribes), and Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), as specified by Section IV.G of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA). Consistent with the procedures outlined in the Commission's Wireless Infrastructure Second Report and Order (1), we have contacted the Indian Tribes or NHOs identified in the attached Table for the projects listed in the attached Table. You referred these projects to us between 12/12/2019 and 12/19/2019. Our contact with these Tribal Nations or NHOs was sent on 12/19/2019. Thus, as described in the Wireless Infrastructure Second Report and Order (2), if you or Commission staff do not receive a statement of interest regarding a particular project from any Tribe or NHO within 15 calendar days of 12/19/2019, your obligations under Section IV of the NPA with respect to these Tribal Nations or NHOs are complete. If a Tribal Nation or NHO responds that it has concerns about a historic property of traditional religious and cultural significance that may be affected by the proposed construction within the 15 calendar day period, the Applicant must involve it in the review as set forth in the NPA, and may not begin construction until the process set forth in the NPA is completed. You are reminded that Section IX of the NPA imposes independent obligations on an Applicant when a previously unidentified site that may be a historic property, including an archeological property, is discovered during construction or after the completion of review. In such instances, the Applicant must cease construction and promptly notify, among others, any potentially affected Tribal Nation or NHO. A Tribal Nation's or NHO's failure to express interest in participating in pre-construction review of an undertaking does not necessarily mean it is not interested in archeological properties or human remains that may inadvertently be discovered during construction. Hence, an Applicant is still required to notify any potentially affected Tribal Nation or NHO of any such finds pursuant to Section IX or other applicable law. Sincerely, Jill Springer Federal Preservation Officer Federal Communications Commission jill.springer@fcc.gov _______________________________________ 1) See Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Deployment, Second Report and Order, FCC 18-30 (Mar. 30, 2018) (Wireless Infrastructure Second Report and Order). 2) See id. at paras. 111-112. LIST OF PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS TCNS# 189955 Referred Date: 12/18/2019 Location: Teft Rd, Spring Arbor, MI Detailed Description of Project: Proposed extension of lattice tower. Tribe Name: Crow Creek Sioux Tribe Tribe Name: Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians TCNS# 189954 Referred Date: 12/18/2019 Location: 26 Mile Rd, Macomb, MI Detailed Description of Project: Upgrage of antennas on an existing transmission tower. Tribe Name: Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians 3.C.f Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 12/20/2019 Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification ofFinal Contacts - Email ID #25566 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/17.2.2-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-619167101dee44f39f3f9381259b05…2/5 TCNS# 189510 Referred Date: 12/17/2019 Location: CR3110, Clarksville, TX Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a lattice style telecommunications tower with antennas within a 50'x50' lease area. Project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Alabama Quassarte Tribal Town Tribe Name: Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Caddo Nation of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Coushatta Indian Tribe Tribe Name: Eastern Shoshone Tribe Tribe Name: Jena Band of Choctaw Indians Tribe Name: Kialegee Tribal Town Tribe Name: Kiowa Indian Tribe THPO Tribe Name: Mescalero Apache Tribe Tribe Name: Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Tribe Name: Tonkawa Tribe Tribe Name: United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma Tribe Name: Wichita and Affiliated Tribes TCNS# 189517 Referred Date: 12/17/2019 Location: FM 1249E, Kilgore, TX Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a monopole style telecommunications tower with antennas within a 50'x50' lease area. Project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Alabama Quassarte Tribal Town Tribe Name: Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Caddo Nation of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Coushatta Indian Tribe Tribe Name: Eastern Shoshone Tribe Tribe Name: Jena Band of Choctaw Indians Tribe Name: Kiowa Indian Tribe THPO Tribe Name: Mescalero Apache Tribe Tribe Name: Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Tribe Name: Tonkawa Tribe Tribe Name: United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma Tribe Name: Wichita and Affiliated Tribes TCNS# 189955 Referred Date: 12/17/2019 Location: Teft Rd, Spring Arbor, MI Detailed Description of Project: Proposed extension of lattice tower. Tribe Name: Citizen Potawatomi Nation Tribe Name: Fort Belknap Indian Community Tribe Name: Hannahville Indian Community Tribe Name: Ho-Chunk Nation Tribe Name: Huron Potawatomi Tribe Name: Keweenaw Bay Indian Community Tribe Name: Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin Tribe Name: Wyandotte Nation TCNS# 189512 Referred Date: 12/17/2019 Location: FM 1252 & CR370, Winona, TX Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a lattice style telecommunications tower with antennas within a 50'x50' lease area. Project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Alabama Quassarte Tribal Town Tribe Name: Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Caddo Nation of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Coushatta Indian Tribe Tribe Name: Eastern Shoshone Tribe Tribe Name: Jena Band of Choctaw Indians Tribe Name: Kiowa Indian Tribe THPO Tribe Name: Mescalero Apache Tribe Tribe Name: Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Tribe Name: Tonkawa Tribe Tribe Name: United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma Tribe Name: Wichita and Affiliated Tribes 3.C.f Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 12/20/2019 Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification ofFinal Contacts - Email ID #25566 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/17.2.2-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-619167101dee44f39f3f9381259b05…3/5 TCNS# 189954 Referred Date: 12/17/2019 Location: 26 Mile Rd, Macomb, MI Detailed Description of Project: Upgrage of antennas on an existing transmission tower. Tribe Name: Citizen Potawatomi Nation Tribe Name: Fort Belknap Indian Community Tribe Name: Hannahville Indian Community Tribe Name: Ho-Chunk Nation Tribe Name: Huron Potawatomi Tribe Name: Keweenaw Bay Indian Community Tribe Name: Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians Tribe Name: Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin Tribe Name: Seneca-Cayuga Nation Tribe Name: Wyandotte Nation TCNS# 189480 Referred Date: 12/16/2019 Location: N Clybourn Ave, Chicago, IL Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on an existing building. Tribe Name: Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe Tribe Name: Fort Belknap Indian Community Tribe Name: Ho-Chunk Nation Tribe Name: Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Kaw Nation Tribe Name: Keweenaw Bay Indian Community Tribe Name: Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin Tribe Name: Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians Tribe Name: Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin Tribe Name: Sac and Fox Nation Tribe Name: Sac and Fox Nation of Missouri Tribe Name: Santee Sioux Nation Tribe Name: Shawnee Tribe Tribe Name: Wyandotte Nation TCNS# 189506 Referred Date: 12/16/2019 Location: US-82, Seymour, TX Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a lattice style telecommunications tower with antennas within a 50'x50' lease area. Project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Comanche Nation Tribe Name: Eastern Shoshone Tribe Tribe Name: Kialegee Tribal Town Tribe Name: Kiowa Indian Tribe THPO Tribe Name: Mescalero Apache Tribe Tribe Name: Tonkawa Tribe Tribe Name: Wichita and Affiliated Tribes TCNS# 189507 Referred Date: 12/16/2019 Location: CR 1346, Tyler, TX Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a monopole style telecommunications tower with antennas within a 50'x50' lease area. Project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Alabama Quassarte Tribal Town Tribe Name: Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Caddo Nation of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Coushatta Indian Tribe Tribe Name: Eastern Shoshone Tribe Tribe Name: Jena Band of Choctaw Indians Tribe Name: Kiowa Indian Tribe THPO Tribe Name: Mescalero Apache Tribe Tribe Name: Muscogee (Creek) Nation Tribe Name: Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Tribe Name: Tonkawa Tribe Tribe Name: United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma Tribe Name: Wichita and Affiliated Tribes TCNS# 189512 Referred Date: 12/19/2019 Location: FM 1252 & CR370, Winona, TX Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a lattice style telecommunications 3.C.f Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 12/20/2019 Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification ofFinal Contacts - Email ID #25566 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/17.2.2-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-619167101dee44f39f3f9381259b05…4/5 tower with antennas within a 50'x50' lease area. Project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Muscogee (Creek) Nation TCNS# 189510 Referred Date: 12/19/2019 Location: CR3110, Clarksville, TX Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a lattice style telecommunications tower with antennas within a 50'x50' lease area. Project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Muscogee (Creek) Nation TCNS# 189517 Referred Date: 12/19/2019 Location: FM 1249E, Kilgore, TX Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a monopole style telecommunications tower with antennas within a 50'x50' lease area. Project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Muscogee (Creek) Nation TCNS# 189517 Referred Date: 12/19/2019 Location: FM 1249E, Kilgore, TX Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a monopole style telecommunications tower with antennas within a 50'x50' lease area. Project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Muscogee (Creek) Nation TCNS# 189171 Referred Date: 12/18/2019 Location: Kapok St & Frangipani Ave, Naples, FL Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma TCNS# 189510 Referred Date: 12/18/2019 Location: CR3110, Clarksville, TX Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a lattice style telecommunications tower with antennas within a 50'x50' lease area. Project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Northwestern Band of Shoshone Nation TCNS# 189480 Referred Date: 12/18/2019 Location: N Clybourn Ave, Chicago, IL Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on an existing building. Tribe Name: Omaha Tribe of Nebraska Tribe Name: Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians Tribe Name: Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Crow Creek Sioux Tribe TCNS# 189506 Referred Date: 12/18/2019 Location: US-82, Seymour, TX Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a lattice style telecommunications tower with antennas within a 50'x50' lease area. Project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Northwestern Band of Shoshone Nation TCNS# 189512 Referred Date: 12/18/2019 Location: FM 1252 & CR370, Winona, TX Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a lattice style telecommunications tower with antennas within a 50'x50' lease area. Project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Northwestern Band of Shoshone Nation TCNS# 189507 Referred Date: 12/18/2019 Location: CR 1346, Tyler, TX Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a monopole style telecommunications tower with antennas within a 50'x50' lease area. Project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Northwestern Band of Shoshone Nation TCNS# 189954 Referred Date: 12/18/2019 Location: 26 Mile Rd, Macomb, MI Detailed Description of Project: Upgrage of antennas on an existing transmission tower. Tribe Name: Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Shawnee Tribe TCNS# 189955 Referred Date: 12/18/2019 Location: Teft Rd, Spring Arbor, MI Detailed Description of Project: Proposed extension of lattice tower. Tribe Name: Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Shawnee Tribe 3.C.f Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 12/20/2019 Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification ofFinal Contacts - Email ID #25566 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/17.2.2-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-619167101dee44f39f3f9381259b05…5/5 LEGEND: * - Notification numbers are assigned by the Commission staff for sites where initial contact was not made through TCNS. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 12/5/2019 Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification ofFinal Contacts - Email ID #25465 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/17.1.1-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-7addc00b3f0848bcab8bfb4f8ed53a…1/3 Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification ofFinal Contacts - Email ID #25465 From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 9:01 am To:tcns@rescom.org Cc:tcnsweekly@fcc.gov CitySwitch Andrew Smith P.O. Box: 5516 Fort Wayne, IN 46895 Dear Applicant: This letter addresses the proposed communications facilities listed below that you have referred to the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) for purposes of contacting federally recognized Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively Indian Tribes), and Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), as specified by Section IV.G of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA). Consistent with the procedures outlined in the Commission's Wireless Infrastructure Second Report and Order (1), we have contacted the Indian Tribes or NHOs identified in the attached Table for the projects listed in the attached Table. You referred these projects to us between 11/28/2019 and 12/05/2019. Our contact with these Tribal Nations or NHOs was sent on 12/05/2019. Thus, as described in the Wireless Infrastructure Second Report and Order (2), if you or Commission staff do not receive a statement of interest regarding a particular project from any Tribe or NHO within 15 calendar days of 12/05/2019, your obligations under Section IV of the NPA with respect to these Tribal Nations or NHOs are complete. If a Tribal Nation or NHO responds that it has concerns about a historic property of traditional religious and cultural significance that may be affected by the proposed construction within the 15 calendar day period, the Applicant must involve it in the review as set forth in the NPA, and may not begin construction until the process set forth in the NPA is completed. You are reminded that Section IX of the NPA imposes independent obligations on an Applicant when a previously unidentified site that may be a historic property, including an archeological property, is discovered during construction or after the completion of review. In such instances, the Applicant must cease construction and promptly notify, among others, any potentially affected Tribal Nation or NHO. A Tribal Nation's or NHO's failure to express interest in participating in pre-construction review of an undertaking does not necessarily mean it is not interested in archeological properties or human remains that may inadvertently be discovered during construction. Hence, an Applicant is still required to notify any potentially affected Tribal Nation or NHO of any such finds pursuant to Section IX or other applicable law. Sincerely, Jill Springer Federal Preservation Officer Federal Communications Commission jill.springer@fcc.gov _______________________________________ 1) See Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Deployment, Second Report and Order, FCC 18-30 (Mar. 30, 2018) (Wireless Infrastructure Second Report and Order). 2) See id. at paras. 111-112. LIST OF PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS TCNS# 187849 Referred Date: 12/04/2019 Location: Filer Ave E, Twin Falls, ID Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on an existing monopole. Tribe Name: Northwestern Band of Shoshone Nation Tribe Name: Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians TCNS# 189170 Referred Date: 12/04/2019 Location: NW 312th St, Okeechobee, FL Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma TCNS# 189172 Referred Date: 12/04/2019 Location: Smith Creek Rd & NF-13, Sopchoppy, FL 3.C.f Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 12/5/2019 Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification ofFinal Contacts - Email ID #25465 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/17.1.1-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-7addc00b3f0848bcab8bfb4f8ed53a…2/3 Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Seminole Nation of Oklahoma TCNS# 189101 Referred Date: 12/04/2019 Location: King St, Alexandria, VA Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on an existing building. Tribe Name: Crow Creek Sioux Tribe Tribe Name: Prairie Island Indian Community TCNS# 189171 Referred Date: 12/04/2019 Location: Kapok St & Frangipani Ave, Naples, FL Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Seminole Nation of Oklahoma Tribe Name: Muscogee (Creek) Nation TCNS# 187850 Referred Date: 12/04/2019 Location: Pole Line Rd E, Twin Falls, ID Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on an existing monopole. Tribe Name: Northwestern Band of Shoshone Nation Tribe Name: Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians TCNS# 189173 Referred Date: 12/04/2019 Location: S Spring Garden Ave & W Volusia Ave, DeLand, FL Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within an 80' x 120' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Seminole Nation of Oklahoma TCNS# 187849 Referred Date: 12/03/2019 Location: Filer Ave E, Twin Falls, ID Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on an existing monopole. Tribe Name: Shoshone-Paiute Tribes Tribe Name: Eastern Shoshone Tribe Tribe Name: Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Heritage Tribal Office (HeTO) Tribe Name: Kiowa Indian Tribe THPO TCNS# 187850 Referred Date: 12/03/2019 Location: Pole Line Rd E, Twin Falls, ID Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on an existing monopole. Tribe Name: Shoshone-Paiute Tribes Tribe Name: Eastern Shoshone Tribe Tribe Name: Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Heritage Tribal Office (HeTO) Tribe Name: Kiowa Indian Tribe THPO TCNS# 189099 Referred Date: 12/03/2019 Location: Ackerman Ave, Clifton, NJ Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on an existing smokestack. Tribe Name: Delaware Nation Tribe Name: Keweenaw Bay Indian Community Tribe Name: Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin Tribe Name: Wyandotte Nation Tribe Name: Shawnee Tribe TCNS# 189172 Referred Date: 12/03/2019 Location: Smith Creek Rd & NF-13, Sopchoppy, FL Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas Tribe Name: Coushatta Indian Tribe Tribe Name: Kialegee Tribal Town Tribe Name: Muscogee (Creek) Nation TCNS# 189173 Referred Date: 12/03/2019 Location: S Spring Garden Ave & W Volusia Ave, DeLand, FL Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within an 80' x 120' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Coushatta Indian Tribe Tribe Name: Muscogee (Creek) Nation Tribe Name: Thlopthlocco Tribal Town TCNS# 189101 Referred Date: 12/03/2019 Location: King St, Alexandria, VA 3.C.f Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 12/5/2019 Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification ofFinal Contacts - Email ID #25465 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/17.1.1-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-7addc00b3f0848bcab8bfb4f8ed53a…3/3 Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on an existing building. Tribe Name: Delaware Nation Tribe Name: Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe Tribe Name: Cultural Heritage Partners Tribe Name: Monacan Nation Tribe Name: Chickahominy Indian Tribe Tribe Name: The Upper Mattaponi Indian Tribe Tribe Name: Nansemond Indian Tribe Tribe Name: Cherokee Nation Tribe Name: Shawnee Tribe TCNS# 189171 Referred Date: 12/03/2019 Location: Kapok St & Frangipani Ave, Naples, FL Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Tribe Name: Muscogee (Creek) Nation Tribe Name: Thlopthlocco Tribal Town LEGEND: * - Notification numbers are assigned by the Commission staff for sites where initial contact was not made through TCNS. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 12/17/2019 Confirmation of Manual Referral of a TCNS Notification https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/17.2.0-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-984554a8503243babf330ed08719a…1/1 Confirmation of Manual Referral of a TCNS Notification From:TCNS Help <TCNSHelp@fcc.gov> Sent:Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:46 am To:tcns@rescom.org 189171 Eastern Shawnee Tribe OK.pdf (166.4 KB) Your manual referral of a proposed tower structure notification has been successfully submitted. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will be processing this referral for purposes of contacting federally recognized Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages, and Native Hawaiian Organizations as specified by Section IV.G of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and the Wireless Infrastructure Second Report and Order dated March 30, 2018. You will receive a Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification of Final Contacts when the FCC has completed processing this referral. Below are the details you submitted. Manual Referral System ID Number: TCNS7566 Referrer Name: Referrer Email: tcns@rescom.org Notification ID: 189171 SHPO Excluded: E-106 File Number: 0008846179 Project Location: Kapok St & Frangipani Ave, Naples, FL, Collier Co. Date Documentation Sent: 2019-10-25 10:43:05 EDT Method Documentation Sent: Hard copy/physical delivery – refer after 36 days Additional Comments: Tribes Who Have Not Responded: Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Unsubscribe | Notification Preferences 3.C.f Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 12/4/2019 Confirmation of Manual Referral of a TCNS Notification https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/17.1.1-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-8b3c70f2f88043269897a7fe2a1630…1/1 Confirmation of Manual Referral of a TCNS Notification From:TCNS Help <TCNSHelp@fcc.gov> Sent:Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:11 pm To:tcns@rescom.org 189171 Seminole Nation OK.pdf (126.1 KB) Your manual referral of a proposed tower structure notification has been successfully submitted. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will be processing this referral for purposes of contacting federally recognized Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages, and Native Hawaiian Organizations as specified by Section IV.G of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and the Wireless Infrastructure Second Report and Order dated March 30, 2018. You will receive a Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification of Final Contacts when the FCC has completed processing this referral. Below are the details you submitted. Manual Referral System ID Number: TCNS7199 Referrer Name: Referrer Email: tcns@rescom.org Notification ID: 189171 SHPO Excluded: E-106 File Number: 0008846179 Project Location: Naples, FL Date Documentation Sent: 2019-10-24 15:10:17 EDT Method Documentation Sent: ONLY electronic delivery – refer after 31 days Additional Comments: Tribes Who Have Not Responded: Seminole Nation of Oklahoma Unsubscribe | Notification Preferences 3.C.f Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 12/4/2019 Confirmation of Manual Referral of a TCNS Notification https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/17.1.1-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-8b3c70f2f88043269897a7fe2a1630…1/1 Confirmation of Manual Referral of a TCNS Notification From:TCNS Help <TCNSHelp@fcc.gov> Sent:Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:12 pm To:tcns@rescom.org 189171 Tribal Letters.pdf (196.6 KB) Your manual referral of a proposed tower structure notification has been successfully submitted. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will be processing this referral for purposes of contacting federally recognized Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages, and Native Hawaiian Organizations as specified by Section IV.G of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and the Wireless Infrastructure Second Report and Order dated March 30, 2018. You will receive a Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification of Final Contacts when the FCC has completed processing this referral. Below are the details you submitted. Manual Referral System ID Number: TCNS7200 Referrer Name: Referrer Email: tcns@rescom.org Notification ID: 189171 SHPO Excluded: E-106 File Number: 0008846179 Project Location: Naples, FL Date Documentation Sent: 2019-10-24 15:11:20 EDT Method Documentation Sent: Hard copy/physical delivery – refer after 36 days Additional Comments: Tribes Who Have Not Responded: Muscogee (Creek) Nation Unsubscribe | Notification Preferences 3.C.f Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 12/4/2019 Confirmation - Referral of a Proposed Tower ConstructionNotification - Email ID #6530357 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/17.1.1-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-8b3c70f2f88043269897a7fe2a1630…1/1 Confirmation - Referral of a Proposed Tower ConstructionNotification - Email ID #6530357 From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 2:22 pm To:tcns@rescom.org Dear Andrew Smith, Your referral of a proposed tower structure notification has been successfully submitted via the Tower Construction Notification System. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will be processing this referral for purposes of contacting federally recognized Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages, and Native Hawaiian Organizations as specified by Section IV.G of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and the Wireless Infrastructure Second Report and Order dated March 30, 2018. You will receive a Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification of Final Contacts when the FCC has completed processing this referral. Below are the details you provided in the referral of the tower you have proposed to construct: Notification Received: 09/03/2019 Notification Referred: 12/03/2019 Notification ID: 189171 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: CitySwitch Consultant Name: Andrew Smith P.O. Box: 5516 City: Fort Wayne State: INDIANA Zip Code: 46895 Phone: 260-385-6999 Email: tcns@rescom.org Structure Type: LTOWER - Lattice Tower Latitude: 26 deg 12 min 36.9 sec N Longitude: 81 deg 36 min 0.7 sec W Location Description: Kapok St & Frangipani Ave City: Naples State: FLORIDA County: COLLIER Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Ground Elevation: 5.8 meters Support Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 82.0 meters above mean sea level Entities Who Have Not Responded: Muscogee (Creek) Nation Contact Date: 09/05/2019 Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Contact Date: 09/05/2019 **Note that the FCC will assign a unique Notification ID number for a site where the initial contact was not made through TCNS. You will need to reference this Notification ID number when you update your project's Status with us. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) RESCOM Environmental Corp. • P.O. Box 5516 • Fort Wayne, IN 46895 Phone: (260) 385-6999 • Fax: (231) 487-0726 www.rescom.org October 25, 2019 Mr. Travis Patton, TCNS Coordinator Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Cultural Preservation Department 70500 E 128th Rd Wyandotte, OK 74370 RE: INVITATION TO COMMENT UNDER SECTION 106 TCNS ID: 189171 Kapok Kapok St & Frangipani Ave Naples, Collier County, FL 34117 Dear Mr. Patton, RESCOM Environmental Corp (RESCOM) was retained by Ignite Wireless to complete Section 106 Compliance as delegated by the FCC and outlined in 36 CFR Part 800 for the above referenced project. Ignite Wireless proposes the construction of a 250’ self-supporting lattice style telecommunications tower with an access drive at the above referenced location. In accordance with Ignite Wireless earlier communications via the FCC Tower Construction Notification System, Ignite Wireless and RESCOM respect the sovereign status of your Tribe and are writing to outline the project. Enclosed for your review are maps and project drawings regarding the proposed project. An archaeological survey was conducted and did not discover any archaeological sites or materials; results and recommendations are detailed in the attached report. Except to the extent that we have agreed otherwise, the ‘Voluntary Best Practices for Expediting the Process of Communications Tower and Antenna Siting Review’ provides that your Tribe should evaluate this submission and respond in writing with an opinion of interest or no interest. If you do not believe that all of the agreed upon materials have been enclosed, or if you have any other questions, please contact our office immediately so that we can reach a satisfactory resolution as soon as possible. We appreciate your assistance in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, RESCOM Environmental Corporation Andrew Smith, Project Manager 260-385-6999 tcns@rescom.org RESCOM 19080047 3.C.f Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) RESCOM Environmental Corp. • P.O. Box 5516 • Fort Wayne, IN 46895 Phone: (260) 385-6999 • Fax: (231) 487-0726 www.rescom.org October 25, 2019 Ms. Anne Edwards-Martel, TCNS Coordinator Muscogee Creek Nation Cultural Preservation Dept., P.O. Box 580 Okmulgee, OK 74447 RE: INVITATION TO COMMENT UNDER SECTION 106 TCNS ID: 189171 Kapok Kapok St & Frangipani Ave Naples, Collier County, FL 34117 Dear Ms. Edwards-Martel, RESCOM Environmental Corp (RESCOM) was retained by Ignite Wireless to complete Section 106 Compliance as delegated by the FCC and outlined in 36 CFR Part 800 for the above referenced project. Ignite Wireless proposes the construction of a 250’ self-supporting lattice style telecommunications tower with an access drive at the above referenced location. In accordance with Ignite Wireless earlier communications via the FCC Tower Construction Notification System, Ignite Wireless and RESCOM respect the sovereign status of your Tribe and are writing to outline the project. Enclosed for your review are maps and project drawings regarding the proposed project. An archaeological survey was conducted and did not discover any archaeological sites or materials; results and recommendations are detailed in the attached report. Except to the extent that we have agreed otherwise, the ‘Voluntary Best Practices for Expediting the Process of Communications Tower and Antenna Siting Review’ provides that your Tribe should evaluate this submission and respond in writing with an opinion of interest or no interest. If you do not believe that all of the agreed upon materials have been enclosed, or if you have any other questions, please contact our office immediately so that we can reach a satisfactory resolution as soon as possible. We appreciate your assistance in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, RESCOM Environmental Corporation Andrew Smith, Project Manager 260-385-6999 tcns@rescom.org RESCOM 19080047 3.C.f Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) RESCOM Environmental Corp. • P.O. Box 5516 • Fort Wayne, IN 46895 Phone: (260) 385-6999 • Fax: (231) 487-0726 www.rescom.org October 25, 2019 Mr. Theodore Isham, Historic Preservation Officer Seminole Nation of Oklahoma P.O. Box 1498 Wewoka, OK 74884 RE: INVITATION TO COMMENT UNDER SECTION 106 TCNS ID: 189171 Kapok Kapok St & Frangipani Ave Naples, Collier County, FL 34117 Dear Mr. Isham, RESCOM Environmental Corp (RESCOM) was retained by Ignite Wireless to complete Section 106 Compliance as delegated by the FCC and outlined in 36 CFR Part 800 for the above referenced project. Ignite Wireless proposes the construction of a 250’ self-supporting lattice style telecommunications tower with an access drive at the above referenced location. In accordance with Ignite Wireless earlier communications via the FCC Tower Construction Notification System, Ignite Wireless and RESCOM respect the sovereign status of your Tribe and are writing to outline the project. Enclosed for your review are maps and project drawings regarding the proposed project. An archaeological survey was conducted and did not discover any archaeological sites or materials; results and recommendations are detailed in the attached report. Except to the extent that we have agreed otherwise, the ‘Voluntary Best Practices for Expediting the Process of Communications Tower and Antenna Siting Review’ provides that your Tribe should evaluate this submission and respond in writing with an opinion of interest or no interest. If you do not believe that all of the agreed upon materials have been enclosed, or if you have any other questions, please contact our office immediately so that we can reach a satisfactory resolution as soon as possible. We appreciate your assistance in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, RESCOM Environmental Corporation Andrew Smith, Project Manager 260-385-6999 tcns@rescom.org RESCOM 19080047 3.C.f Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) RESCOM Environmental Corp. • P.O. Box 5516 • Fort Wayne, IN 46895 Phone: (260) 385-6999 • Fax: (231) 487-0726 www.rescom.org October 25, 2019 Mr. Mekko Ryan Morrow, Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Thlopthloccotribaltowntowers@gmail.com; CC: Thpo@tttown.org P.O. Box 188 Okemah, OK 74859 RE: INVITATION TO COMMENT UNDER SECTION 106 TCNS ID: 189171 Kapok Kapok St & Frangipani Ave Naples, Collier County, FL 34117 Dear Mr. Morrow, RESCOM Environmental Corp (RESCOM) was retained by Ignite Wireless to complete Section 106 Compliance as delegated by the FCC and outlined in 36 CFR Part 800 for the above referenced project. Ignite Wireless proposes the construction of a 250’ self-supporting lattice style telecommunications tower with an access drive at the above referenced location. In accordance with Ignite Wireless earlier communications via the FCC Tower Construction Notification System, Ignite Wireless and RESCOM respect the sovereign status of your Tribe and are writing to outline the project. Enclosed for your review are maps and project drawings regarding the proposed project. An archaeological survey was conducted and did not discover any archaeological sites or materials; results and recommendations are detailed in the attached report. Except to the extent that we have agreed otherwise, the ‘Voluntary Best Practices for Expediting the Process of Communications Tower and Antenna Siting Review’ provides that your Tribe should evaluate this submission and respond in writing with an opinion of interest or no interest. If you do not believe that all of the agreed upon materials have been enclosed, or if you have any other questions, please contact our office immediately so that we can reach a satisfactory resolution as soon as possible. We appreciate your assistance in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, RESCOM Environmental Corporation Andrew Smith, Project Manager 260-385-6999 tcns@rescom.org RESCOM 19080047 3.C.f Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 9/6/2019 Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID: 189171) - EmailID #6407713 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/16.6.0-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-a3bf6130902c92f5de1d5e1fbef3bb…1/2 Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID: 189171) - EmailID #6407713 From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:09 pm To:tcns@rescom.org Dear Andrew Smith, Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this email is to inform you that an authorized user of the TCNS has replied to a proposed tower construction notification that you had submitted through the TCNS. The following message has been sent to you from Cell Tower Coordinator Kelly Nelson of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma in reference to Notification ID #189171: The Cultural Preservation Office of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma requires the following information regarding all proposed FCC projects. DO NOT EMAIL DOCUMENTATION; IT WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT BEING OPENED. Submit by US postal mail or other parcel carrier all the following information for all telecommunication projects to: Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Attn: Kelly Nelson 70500 E. 128 Rd. Wyandotte, OK 74370 1. Provide a 1-page cover letter with the following information: a. TCNS Number b. Company Name c. Project Name, City, County, State d. Project type e. Project coordinates f. Total area surveyed in acres g. Contact information. 2. Professional cultural/archaeological resource survey report. 3. Aerial and/or USGS topographic maps showing general project location (small scale). 4. Aerial, color USGS topographic, or planimetric maps showing project area (large scale). 5. Project site plan map depicting labeled shovel test locations. 6. Shovel Test Log. 7. Site photographs. We request the opportunity to review and comment on scopes of work for projects whose purpose is to evaluate or mitigate archaeological sites discovered during a telecom project survey, and we also request to review the final reports for those projects. NOTE: The 30 day review period begins when we, The Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, receive ALL required documentation for the TCNS submittal, not when it is sent out. We suggest sending TCNS submissions with a tracking number to reference and confirm when we receive it in our office. The Eastern Shawnee Procedures document is recommended for guidance, send an email to Kelly Nelson at: celltower@estoo.net to request the most current copy. For your convenience, the information you submitted for this notification is detailed below. Notification Received: 09/03/2019 Notification ID: 189171 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: CitySwitch 3.C.f Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 9/6/2019 Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID: 189171) - EmailID #6407713 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/16.6.0-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-a3bf6130902c92f5de1d5e1fbef3bb…2/2 Consultant Name: Andrew Smith P.O. Box: 5516 City: Fort Wayne State: INDIANA Zip Code: 46895 Phone: 260-385-6999 Email: tcns@rescom.org Structure Type: LTOWER - Lattice Tower Latitude: 26 deg 12 min 36.9 sec N Longitude: 81 deg 36 min 0.7 sec W Location Description: Kapok St & Frangipani Ave City: Naples State: FLORIDA County: COLLIER Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Ground Elevation: 5.8 meters Support Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 82.0 meters above mean sea level 3.C.f Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 9/6/2019 NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWERCONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email I… https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/16.6.0-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-fc4962e1d5b6b397da8f9716b7e46…1/3 NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWERCONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #6404659 From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 3:02 am To:tcns@rescom.org Cc:tcnsweekly@fcc.gov Dear Applicant: Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the notification that you provided through TCNS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). We note that the review period for all parties begins upon receipt of the Submission Packet pursuant to Section VII.A of the NPA and notifications that do not provide this serve as information only. Persons who have received the notification that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally-recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively "Tribal Nations"), Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), and State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribal Nations and NHOs and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribal Nation and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribal Nations may have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission (NPA), all Tribal Nations and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribal Nation or NHO. (NPA, Section IV.F.4). The notification that you provided was forwarded to the following Tribal Nations and NHOs. A Tribal Nation or NHO may not respond until a full Submission Packet is provided. If, upon receipt, the Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort at follow-up contact, unless the Tribal Nation or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, Section IV.F.5). In the event a Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond to a follow-up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribal Nation or NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Second Report and Order released on March 30, 2018 (FCC 18-30). 1. NAGPRA & Section 106 Representative Fred Dayhoff - Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida - Tamiami Station (PO Box: 440021) Miami, FL - hopel@miccosukeetribe.com - 239-695-4360 - regular mail If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida has no interest in participating in pre-construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 2. Compliance Review Supervisor THPO Compliance - Seminole Tribe of Florida - 30290 Josie Billie Hwy PMB 1004 Clewiston, FL - THPOcompliance@semtribe.com - 863-983-6549 (ext: 12245) - electronic mail 3. Historic Preservation Officer Theodore Isham - Seminole Nation of Oklahoma - (PO Box: 1498) Wewoka, OK - tcns-sno@sno-nsn.gov - 405-234-5218 - electronic mail Exclusions: Please send all inquiries to email address: tcns-sno@sno-nsn.gov 3.C.f Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 9/6/2019 NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWERCONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email I… https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/16.6.0-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-fc4962e1d5b6b397da8f9716b7e46…2/3 If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma has no interest in participating in pre-construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 4. TCNS Coordinator Anne Edwards-Martel Ms - Muscogee (Creek) Nation - Highway 75 & Loop 56 (PO Box: 580) Okmulgee, OK - mcntcns@mcn-nsn.gov; section106@mcn-nsn.gov - 918-732-7639 - regular mail 5. Cell Tower Coordinator Kelly Nelson - Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma - 70500 East 128 Road Wyandotte, OK - celltower@estoo.net - 918-666-2435 (ext: 1861) - regular mail Exclusions: DO NOT EMAIL DOCUMENTATION; it will be deleted without being opened. Submit one printed color copy by US postal mail or other parcel carrier of all documentation to: Eastern Shawnee Tribe Attn: Cell Tower Program 70500 E. 128 Rd. Wyandotte, OK 74370 Provide a 1-page cover letter with the following information: a. TCNS Number b. Company Name c. Project Name, City, County, State d. Project type e. Project coordinates f. Contact information The Eastern Shawnee Procedures document is available and highly recommended for guidance; send an email to celltower@estoo.net requesting our most current copy. 6. Mekko Ryan Morrow - Thlopthlocco Tribal Town - P.O. Box 188 Okemah, OK - thpo@tttown.org - 000-000-0000 - electronic mail Exclusions: Thlopthlocco Tribal Town requests that all initial review materials required by applicable law be submitted by email directly to thpo@tttown.org. In addition, in the event archeological or cultural materials or human remains are discovered at any time during this undertaking, please notify Thlopthlocco Tribal Town immediately. The notification that you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning. You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to construction, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section VII.A of the NPA unless the project is excluded from SHPO review under Section III D or E of the NPA. 7. SHPO Lee Warner - Alabama Historical Commission - 468 South Perry Street Montgomery, AL - lwarner@mail.preserveala.org - 334-242-3184 - electronic mail 8. Deputy SHPO Elizabeth Ann Brown - Alabama Historical Commission - 468 South Perry 3.C.f Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 9/6/2019 NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWERCONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email I… https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/16.6.0-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-fc4962e1d5b6b397da8f9716b7e46…3/3 Street Montgomery, AL - ebrown@mail.preserveala.org - 334-242-3185 - electronic mail 9. Deputy SHPO Compliance Review Laura A Kammerer - Div of Historical Resources, Dept of State - 500 S. Bronough St. Tallahassee, FL - lkammerer@dos.state.fl.us - 850-245-6333 - electronic mail 10. Historic Preservationist Robin Jackson - Florida Division of Historical Resources - 500 S. Bronough Street Tallahasse, FL - Robin.Jackson@DOS.myflorida.com - 850-245-6333 - electronic mail TCNS automatically forwards all notifications to all Tribal Nations and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal. However, if a proposal for PTC wayside poles falls within a designated exclusion, you need not expect any response and need not pursue any additional process with that Tribal Nation or SHPO. In addition, a particular Tribal Nation or SHPO may also set forth policies or procedures within its details box that exclude from review certain facilities (for example, a statement that it does not review collocations with no ground disturbance; or that indicates that no response within 30 days indicates no interest in participating in pre-construction review). Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above have opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail notification. If you learn that any of the above contact information is no longer valid, please contact the FCC by emailing tcnshelp@fcc.gov. The following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: Notification Received: 09/03/2019 Notification ID: 189171 Excluded from SHPO Review: No Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: CitySwitch Consultant Name: Andrew Smith P.O. Box: 5516 City: Fort Wayne State: INDIANA Zip Code: 46895 Phone: 260-385-6999 Email: tcns@rescom.org Structure Type: LTOWER - Lattice Tower Latitude: 26 deg 12 min 36.9 sec N Longitude: 81 deg 36 min 0.7 sec W Location Description: Kapok St & Frangipani Ave City: Naples State: FLORIDA County: COLLIER Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Ground Elevation: 5.8 meters Support Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 82.0 meters above mean sea level If you have any questions or comments regarding this notice, please contact the FCC using the electronic Help Request form located on the FCC's website at: https://www.fcc.gov/wireless/available-support-services You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480-3201 (TTY 717-338-2824). Hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal Communications Commission 3.C.f Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 9/6/2019 Proposed Tower Structure Info - Email ID #6403526 https://apps.rackspace.com/versions/webmail/16.6.0-RC/popup.php?wsid=30dcad722f6341b5a4a8bd5d486fe1a3-d51ac2341b49c4353b5a94792edcb…1/1 Proposed Tower Structure Info - Email ID #6403526 From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 1:20 pm To:tcns@rescom.org Dear Andrew Smith, Thank you for submitting a notification regarding your proposed construction via the Tower Construction Notification System. Note that the system has assigned a unique Notification ID number for this proposed construction. You will need to reference this Notification ID number when you update your project's Status with us. Below are the details you provided for the construction you have proposed: Notification Received: 09/03/2019 Notification ID: 189171 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: CitySwitch Consultant Name: Andrew Smith P.O. Box: 5516 City: Fort Wayne State: INDIANA Zip Code: 46895 Phone: 260-385-6999 Email: tcns@rescom.org Structure Type: LTOWER - Lattice Tower Latitude: 26 deg 12 min 36.9 sec N Longitude: 81 deg 36 min .7 sec W Location Description: Kapok St & Frangipani Ave City: Naples State: FLORIDA County: COLLIER Detailed Description of Project: Collocation of antennas on a new lattice telecommunications tower, within a 100' x 100' lease area. Proposed project will include ground disturbance. Ground Elevation: 5.8 meters Support Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 76.2 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 82 meters above mean sea level 3.C.f Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) ATTACHMENT C – INFORMAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT & MAPS Ignite Wireless, Inc FCC NEPA Summary Report Kapok 3.C.f Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) RESCOM Environmental Corp. • P.O. Box 361 • Petoskey, MI 49770 Phone: (231) 409-2563 • Fax: (231) 487-0726 www.rescom.org September 13, 2019 Colleen Carroll Ignite Wireless, Inc 102 Mary Alice Park Road, Suite 505 Cumming, GA 30040 RE: Informal Biological Assessment for the proposed construction of a telecommunications tower facility: Kapok Tower Kapok St & Frangipani Ave Naples, Collier County, FL 34117 Dear Ms. Carroll, RESCOM Environmental Corp has completed an Informal Biological Assessment (IBA) in conjunction with a NEPA assessment for the above referenced property. The purpose of this IBA is to address potential affects to threatened and endangered species and critical habitats as referenced in 47 CFR 1.1307 (a) 3. Additionally, this IBA addresses potential affects to migratory birds as referenced in the Note to 47 CFR 1.1307 (d). Based on the information presented in this report, the proposed project is not likely to impact threatened and endangered species as contained in 50 CFR 17.11, 17.22, 222.23(a), 227.4, critical habitats as contained in 50 CFR 17.95, 17.96, and part 226, or migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this service and we look forward to working with you in the future. If you have any questions or comments, please call our office at (231) 409-2563. Sincerely, RESCOM Environmental Corp Andrew Smith Project Manager andrew.smith@rescom.org RESCOM File 19080047 3.C.f Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) INFORMAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Ignite Wireless Informal Biological Report Kapok Tower Site Name: Kapok Tower Site Number: Site Location: Kapok St & Frangipani Ave, Naples, Collier County, FL 34117 Project Type: Proposed construction of a 250’ self-supporting lattice style telecommunications tower Unless stated otherwise, for the purpose of this report RESCOM Environmental Corp assessed the direct project area and a 30’ buffer in all directions from the boundary of all proposed lease areas. REGULATORY STATEMENT: This Informal Biological Assessment (IBA) is being performed in conjunction with a NEPA assessment as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) referenced in 47 CFR Subpart 1, Chapter 1, Sections 1.130-1.1319. This IBA addresses potential affects to threatened and endangered species and critical habitats as referenced in 47 CFR 1.1307 (a) 3. Additionally, this IBA addresses potential affects to migratory birds as referenced in the Note to 47 CFR 1.1307 (d). For the purposes of this report, RESCOM assessed threatened and endangered species as contained in 50 CFR 17.11, 17.22, 222.23(a), 227.4, critical habitats as contained in 50 CFR 17.95, 17.96, and part 226, and migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. PROJECT OVERVIEW: CitySwitch proposes the construction of a 250’ self-supporting lattice style telecommunications tower within a 100’ x 100’ lease area. A proposed driveway off Kapok Street will be utilized for access. The proposed project will route utilities to the nearest power and telco sources. Potential ground disturbance and habitat impact will be limited to the proposed 100’ x 100’ lease area, access easement, and utility easement. LOCAL HABITAT: RESCOM conducted a field reconnaissance of the proposed project area and determined the habitat at the subject property consists of a grass lot and dirt road. Habitats at the adjacent properties include scattered trees, grass lots, and bushes in all directions. CRITICAL HABITAT, WILDLIFE REFUGES, AND WETLANDS: RESCOM utilized the USFWS Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) decision support system to determine if there are any critical habitats or National Wildlife Refuges within or near the proposed project area. Based on the IPaC results, there are no critical habitats or National Wildlife Refuges at or near the proposed project area. Based on a review of the digitized National Wetlands Inventory maintained by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the subject property is not within the boundary of a designated wetland. Additionally, no wetland indicators such as wetland vegetation or standing water were noted at the time of the field inspection. According to the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey, underlying soils consist of Riviera soils. Riviera series are not listed as hydric soils by the United States Department of Agriculture. The nearest body of water, a river, is 3.C.f Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Ignite Wireless Informal Biological Report Kapok Tower approximately 900 feet north of the subject property. Based on all of these factors there are no wetland areas at or near the subject property. THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES: RESCOM utilized IPaC to determine if any listed or potentially listed Threatened & Endangered species exist within or within 30’ of the proposed project area. RESCOM then reviewed various field guides and reference books to determine what habitats are necessary to support the listed or potentially listed species of the area. Necessary habitats were compared to the habitat found at and near the subject property. Based on this comparison, none of the listed or potentially listed Threatened & Endangered species identified by the USFWS are likely to be found at the subject property, or within a 30’ buffer zone surrounding all proposed lease areas. A complete list of these species, their required habitat, and the potential project impact is as follows: Species Status* Required Habitat Potential Impact Reasoning American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis LT Prefer fresh water marsh, may occassionally be within brackish waters. Nests within swamps and marshes. No Effect No Suitable Habitat American Crocodile Crocodylus acutus LT Coastal habitat, living in brackish and saltwater areas in mangrove swamps. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Audubon's Crested Caracara Polyborus plancus audubonii LT Occurs in dry or wet prairie areas with scattered cabbage palms (Sabal palmetto). May also be found in lightly wooded areas. May use improved or semi- improved pasture with the presence of seasonal wetlands. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Bartram's Hairstreak Butterfly Strymon acis bartrami LE Habitat includes pine rockland. Caterpillars feed only on pineland croton, an understory plant in pine rockland habitat. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Cape Sable Seaside Sparrow Ammodramus maritimus mirabilis LE Preferred nesting habitat is a mixed marl prairie community which often includes muhly grass (Muhlenbergia filipes) and moderately dense clumped grasses, with open space permitting ground movements by the sparrow. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon corais couperi LT Pine flatwoods, scrubby flatwoods, high pine, dry prairie, tropical hardwood hammocks, edges of freshwater marshes, coastal dunes, and human-altered habitats. Require a mix of habitats for full annual cycle. No Effect No Suitable Habitat 3.C.f Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Ignite Wireless Informal Biological Report Kapok Tower Species Status* Required Habitat Potential Impact Reasoning Everglade Snail Kite Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus LE Consists of freshwater marshes and the shallow vegetated edges of lakes where apple snails can be found, characterized as palustrine- emergent, long-hydroperiod wetlands often in organic peat substrate overlying oolitic limestone or sand or directly on limestone or marl. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Florida Bonneted Bat Eumops floridanus LE This bat occurs in urban, suburban, and forested areas; it roosts in buildings (e.g., in attics, rock or brick chimneys of fireplaces, and especially under Spanish roof tiles, often in buildings dating from about 1920- 1930), sometimes in tree hollows (including those made by woodpeckers), occasionally in foliage of palm trees (e.g., shafts of Royal Palm leaves); also has been found under rocks, in fissures in limestone outcrops, and near excavations (Layne 1978, Timm and Genoways 2004). No Effect No Suitable Habitat Florida Grasshopper Sparrow Ammodramus savannarum floridanus LE The Florida grasshopper sparrow requires large treeless grasslands dominated by bunch grasses, low shrubs, and saw palmetto with enough interspersed bare ground for this ground-dwelling sparrow to forage effectively. This habitat is dependent on frequent burning, and the sparrows prefer prairies which have been burned within the previous two years. The prairie was historically maintained by frequent wildfires which were ignited by lightning, or prescribed fires set by cattle ranchers. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Florida Leafwing Butterfly Anaea troglodyta floridalis LE Habitat includes pine rockland. Caterpillars feed only on pineland croton, an understory plant in pine rockland habitat. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Florida Panther Puma (=Felis) concolor coryi LE Diverse habitat including wetlands, swamps, upland forests, and stands of saw palmetto. No Effect No Suitable Habitat 3.C.f Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Ignite Wireless Informal Biological Report Kapok Tower Species Status* Required Habitat Potential Impact Reasoning Florida Prairie- clover Dalea carthagenensis floridana LE Pine rocklands, edges of rockland hammocks, coastal uplands, marl prairie. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Florida Scrub-jay Aphelocoma coerulescens LT The Florida scrub-jay is the only species of bird that is unique to Florida. Scrub-jays inhabit sand pine and xeric oak scrub, and scrubby flatwoods, which occur in some of the highest and driest areas of Florida – ancient sandy ridges that run down the middle of the state, old sand dunes along the coasts, and sandy deposits along rivers in the interior of the state. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Garber's Spurge Chamaesyce garberi LT Sandy soils over limestone in pine rocklands, hammock edges, coastal rock barrens, grass prairies, salt flats, beach ridges, and swales. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Ivory-billed Woodpecker Campephilus principalis LE Found in mature bottomland forest and cypress swamps with large hardwoods. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Kirtland’s Warbler Dendroica kirtlandii LE Occurs in young jack pine stands. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta LT Loggerheads nest on ocean beaches, generally preferring high energy, relatively narrow, steeply sloped, coarse-grained beaches. Take up residence in areas often characterized by accumulations of floating material. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Miami Blue Butterfly Cyclargus (=Hemiargus) thomasi bethunebakeri LE Habitat includes tropical hardwood hammocks and associated margins. Caterpillars hatch and feed exclusively on gray nicker bean. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Piping Plover Charadrius melodus LT Suitable breeding habitats include wide beaches with highly clumped vegetation such as around small alkaline lakes and reservoir beaches. No Effect No Suitable Habitat 3.C.f Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Ignite Wireless Informal Biological Report Kapok Tower Species Status* Required Habitat Potential Impact Reasoning Puma (=mountain Lion) Puma (=Felis) concolor (all subsp. except coryi) LT Diverse habitat including wetlands, swamps, upland forests, and stands of saw palmetto. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa LT Breeds on the tundra; during migration and in the winter it can be found on tidal flats, rocky shores, and beaches. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis LE This endangered species is a habitat specialist that is strongly tied to old-growth pine forests that burn frequently, leaving the understory mostly clear of younger pines and hardwoods. They were once common in vast tracts of longleaf pine; now they also occur in loblolly, slash, and some other pine stands in the southeastern pine flatwoods. No Effect No Suitable Habitat Wood Stork Mycteria americana LT Prefers freshwater and estaurine wetlands, primarily nesting in cypress or mangrove swamps. Feed in freshwater marshes, narrow tidal creeks, or flooded tidal pools. No Effect No Suitable Habitat *LE: Listed Endangered; LT: Listed Threatened; PE: Proposed Endangered; PT: Proposed Threatened MIGRATORY BIRDS: Based on the results of a field reconnaissance and review of available maps maintained by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and USFWS, the proposed project area is not located in a waterway, wildlife refuge, national wilderness area, grassland, forest area, ridge-line, coastline or area commonly known to have high incidences of fog or low clouds, where migratory birds may be found. The proposed project area is located in a primary flyway. While the probability that migratory birds will be found within the project area is minimal, the presence of migratory birds cannot be ruled out. The IPaC results suggest multiple migratory bird species may be located within the county of the project area. The USFWS has established “Service Guidance on the Siting, Construction, Operation and Decommissioning of Communication Towers” to reduce potential impact to migratory birds. These guidelines suggest, if collocating on an existing tower or non-tower structure is not possible, that proposed towers be constructed 199’ or less in overall height, without the use of guy wires, and in a facility with a minimum possible footprint. Additionally, the USFWS suggests towers be unlit or lit with only white or red strobe lights. All necessary guy wires should have daytime visual markers on the wires. Lastly, towers should be designed to encourage future collocations. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Ignite Wireless Informal Biological Report Kapok Tower While the proposed tower will have an overall height of 250’, according to the current available studies, such as the Michigan State Police Tower Study, towers above 500’ appear to have more of an effect on migratory birds than towers that are shorter than 500’. Based on the construction drawings provided by CitySwitch, we have concluded that steps have been taken to adhere to the USFWS tower siting guidelines including constructing with a minimum facility footprint, and to accommodate future collocations. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the information presented in this report, habitats necessary to support listed and potentially listed Threatened & Endangered species and Critical Habitats do not exist at the subject property or in the vicinity. Therefore, the proposed project is not likely to impact Threatened & Endangered species as contained in 50 CFR 17.11, 17.22, 222.23(a), 227.4, critical habitats as contained in 50 CFR 17.95, 17.96, and part 226, or migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Joe Lee / Biologist Andrew Smith / Report Preparer RESCOM Environmental Corp. RESCOM Environmental Corp. RESCOM File 19080047 3.C.f Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Ignite Wireless Informal Biological Report Kapok Tower SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) Results U.S. Fish & Wildlife service National Wetlands Inventory Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey North American Flyway Map 3.C.f Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE South Florida Ecological Services Field Office 1339 20th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3559 Phone: (772) 562-3909 Fax: (772) 562-4288 http://fws.gov/verobeach In Reply Refer To: Consultation Code: 04EF2000-2019-SLI-1080 Event Code: 04EF2000-2019-E-03329 Project Name: Kapok Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. August 30, 2019 3.C.f Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 08/30/2019 Event Code: 04EF2000-2019-E-03329   2    A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12. If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/ eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and bats. Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http:// www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http:// www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/ comtow.html. We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. Attachment(s): ▪Official Species List 3.C.f Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 08/30/2019 Event Code: 04EF2000-2019-E-03329   1    Official Species List This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: South Florida Ecological Services Field Office 1339 20th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3559 (772) 562-3909 3.C.f Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 08/30/2019 Event Code: 04EF2000-2019-E-03329   2    Project Summary Consultation Code:04EF2000-2019-SLI-1080 Event Code:04EF2000-2019-E-03329 Project Name:Kapok Project Type:COMMUNICATIONS TOWER Project Description:New 250 ft Tower Project Location: Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/place/26.21031128211728N81.60018047018193W Counties:Collier, FL 3.C.f Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 08/30/2019 Event Code: 04EF2000-2019-E-03329   3    Endangered Species Act Species There is a total of 25 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. 1.NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. Mammals NAME STATUS Florida Bonneted Bat Eumops floridanus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8630 Endangered Florida Panther Puma (=Felis) concolor coryi No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1763 Habitat assessment guidelines: https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/guideline/assessment/population/8/office/41420.pdf Endangered Puma (=mountain Lion) Puma (=Felis) concolor (all subsp. except coryi) Population: FL No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6049 Similarity of Appearance (Threatened) West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. This species is also protected by the Marine Mammal Protection Act, and may have additional consultation requirements. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469 Threatened 1 3.C.f Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 08/30/2019 Event Code: 04EF2000-2019-E-03329   4    Birds NAME STATUS Audubon's Crested Caracara Polyborus plancus audubonii Population: FL pop. No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8250 Threatened Cape Sable Seaside Sparrow Ammodramus maritimus mirabilis There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6584 Endangered Everglade Snail Kite Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7713 Species survey guidelines: https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/guideline/survey/population/1221/office/41420.pdf Endangered Florida Grasshopper Sparrow Ammodramus savannarum floridanus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/32 Endangered Florida Scrub-jay Aphelocoma coerulescens No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6174 Threatened Ivory-billed Woodpecker Campephilus principalis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8230 Endangered Kirtland's Warbler Setophaga kirtlandii (= Dendr oica kirtlandii) No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8078 Endangered Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Population: [Atlantic Coast and Northern Great Plains populations] - Wherever found, except those areas where listed as endangered. There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039 Threatened Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864 Threatened Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614 Endangered Wood Stork Mycteria americana Threatened 3.C.f Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 08/30/2019 Event Code: 04EF2000-2019-E-03329   5    NAME STATUS Population: AL, FL, GA, MS, NC, SC No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8477 Habitat assessment guidelines: https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/guideline/assessment/population/124/office/41420.pdf Reptiles NAME STATUS American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 Similarity of Appearance (Threatened) American Crocodile Crocodylus acutus Population: U.S.A. (FL) There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6604 Threatened Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon corais couperi No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/646 Threatened Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Population: Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110 Threatened Fishes NAME STATUS Atlantic Sturgeon (gulf Subspecies) Acipenser oxyrinchus (=oxyrhynchus) desotoi There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/651 Threatened 3.C.f Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 08/30/2019 Event Code: 04EF2000-2019-E-03329   6    Insects NAME STATUS Bartram's Hairstreak Butterfly Strymon acis bartrami There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4837 Endangered Florida Leafwing Butterfly Anaea troglodyta floridalis There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6652 Endangered Miami Blue Butterfly Cyclargus (=Hemiargus) thomasi bethunebakeri No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3797 Endangered Flowering Plants NAME STATUS Florida Prairie-clover Dalea carthagenensis floridana No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2300 Endangered Garber's Spurge Chamaesyce garberi No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8229 Threatened Critical habitats THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Wetland 19080047 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Standards and Support Team, wetlands_team@fws.gov Wetlands Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond Lake Other Riverine August 30, 2019 0 0.1 0.20.05 mi 0 0.15 0.30.075 km 1:7,218 This page was produced by the NWI mapper National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Soil Map—Collier County Area, Florida Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/13/2019 Page 1 of 32898600289870028988002898900289900028991002899200289930028994002899500289960028986002898700289880028989002899000289910028992002899300289940028995002899600439300439400439500439600439700439800439900440000440100440200440300440400440500440600440700440800 439300 439400 439500 439600 439700 439800 439900 440000 440100 440200 440300 440400 440500 440600 440700 440800 26° 12' 53'' N 81° 36' 29'' W26° 12' 53'' N81° 35' 31'' W26° 12' 19'' N 81° 36' 29'' W26° 12' 19'' N 81° 35' 31'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 0 350 700 1400 2100Feet 0 100 200 400 600Meters Map Scale: 1:7,400 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Collier County Area, Florida Survey Area Data: Version 11, Sep 18, 2018 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 6, 2015—Feb 12, 2015 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map—Collier County Area, Florida Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/13/2019 Page 2 of 3 3.C.f Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 14 Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum, 0 to 2 percent slopes 13.3 6.6% 16 Oldsmar fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 13.8 6.8% 18 Riviera fine sand, limestone substratum, 0 to 2 percent slopes 150.2 74.2% 21 Boca fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 17.3 8.6% 99 Water 7.8 3.9% Totals for Area of Interest 202.4 100.0% Soil Map—Collier County Area, Florida Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/13/2019 Page 3 of 3 3.C.f Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) USGS The National Map: Orthoimagery. Data refreshed April, 2019. National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250 Feet Ü81°36'19.38"W 26°12'53.08"N 81°35'41.92"W 26°12'20.80"N SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT SPECIAL FLOODHAZARD AREAS Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)Zone A, V, A99With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areasof 1% annual chance flood with averagedepth less than one foot or with drainageareas of less than one square mile Zone X Future Conditions 1% AnnualChance Flood Hazard Zone XArea with Reduced Flood Risk due toLevee. See Notes.Zone X Area with Flood Risk due to Levee Zone D NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D Channel, Culvert, or Storm SewerLevee, Dike, or Floodwall Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance17.5 Water Surface ElevationCoastal Transect Coastal Transect BaselineProfile BaselineHydrographic Feature Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Effective LOMRs Limit of StudyJurisdiction Boundary Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available Unmapped This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from theauthoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This mapwas exported on 8/30/2019 at 10:14:15 AM and does notreflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date andtime. The NFHL and effective information may change orbecome superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following mapelements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images forunmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used forregulatory purposes. Legend OTHER AREAS OFFLOOD HAZARD OTHER AREAS GENERALSTRUCTURES OTHERFEATURES MAP PANELS 8 1:6,000 B 20.2 The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 8/30/2019 ArcGIS - USA Federal Lands https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/print.html 1/1 University of South Florida, County of Collier, FDEP, BuildingFootprintUSA, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA | nationamap.gov | University of South Florida, County of Collier, FDEP, BuildingFootprintUSA, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA USA Federal Lands This web map presents the federal and tribal land areas of the United States USA Federal Lands NationalMapFederalLands Forest Service Department of Defense Bureau of Land Management US Fish and Wildlife Service National Park Service Bureau of Indian Affairs Bureau of Reclamation Other Agencies World Hillshade World Hillshade 400ft 3.C.f Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Wilderness Map Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, 10/17/2019, 2:38:06 PM 0 0.07 0.130.03 mi 0 0.1 0.20.05 km 1:4,514 Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS County of Collier, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGS, EPA, USDA | Wilderness Institute, College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812 | 3.C.f Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) k e b e e 4ABAHAMAS SCALE 1:7,500,000 200 300 400 MILES 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 KILOMETERS o o oAlbers equal area projection, standard parallels 29 30'N and 45 30'N, central meridian 96 W Produced in the Division of Realty, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Desecheo Base Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey January 3, 2018 3.C.f Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials 10/17/2019 Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species [USFWS] https://fws.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/print.html 1/1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service | County of Collier, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, Intermap, USGS, METI/NASA, EPA, USDA Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species [USFWS] A specific geographic area(s) that contains features essential for the conservation of a threatened or endangered species and that may require special management and protection. Final Linear Features Final Polygon Features Proposed Linear Features Proposed Polygon Features 600ft 3.C.f Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials J a c k s o n v i l l e M o b i le DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Wichita and Affiliated Tribes (Wichita, Keechi, Waco & Tawakonie), Oklahoma 3.C.f Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Revised Date: 8.4.2020 PL20190002701 3.C.f Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 368Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 369Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 370Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 376Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 377Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 378Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 383Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 384Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.fPacket Pg. 402Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Drive N. Naples, FL 34104 239-252-2400 RECEIPT OF PAYMENT Receipt Number:2020727765 Transaction Number:2020-033013 Date Paid:04/14/2020 Amount Due:$5,625.00 Payment Details: Payment Method Amount Paid Check Number Credit Card $5,625.00 PL20190002701 Amount Paid:$5,625.00 Change / Overage:$0.00 Contact:Ignite Wireless - Kyle Lotze 102 Mary Alice Park Rd Cumming, GA 30040 FEE DETAILS: Fee Description Reference Number Original Fee Amount Paid GL Account Legal Advertising Fee PL20190002701 $1,125.00 $1,125.00 131-138326-341950 Credit PL20190002701 $5,000.00 $500.00 131-138326-341280 GL Transfer PL20190002701 $5,000.00 $500.00 131-138326-341276 Variance (non-residential)PL20190002701 $5,000.00 $4,500.00 131-138326-341280 Cashier Name:ThomasThompson Batch Number:9115 Entered By: RenaldPaul 3.C.f Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Drive N. Naples, FL 34104 239-252-2400 RECEIPT OF PAYMENT Receipt Number:2019685544 Transaction Number:2019-108818 Date Paid:11/26/2019 Amount Due:$500.00 Payment Details: Payment Method Amount Paid Check Number Credit Card $500.00 15695059-C1465 1667 Amount Paid:$500.00 Change / Overage:$0.00 Contact:Ignite Wireless - Kyle Lotze 102 Mary Alice Park Rd Cumming, GA 30040 FEE DETAILS: Fee Description Reference Number Original Fee Amount Paid GL Account Pre-application Meeting PL20190002701 $500.00 $500.00 131-138326-341276 Cashier Name:AlinaHarris Batch Number:8772 Entered By: JohnMartin 3.C.f Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL20190002701 – Kapok St SLC009 AT&T Firstnet Cell Tower (VA) - PRE-APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Ellen Murray Camden Smith, (Ops Staff) • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Jim Alderman / 954-303-3170 / jjwirelessconsult@yahoo.com • Agent to list for PL# City Switch / Jim Alderman • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels)  JOHANNES STEFFENS (Parcel: 00307840002) • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) Pre-Application for Variance • Please list the details of the project including density, proposed or considered uses for the project, size of commercial vs. residential, number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): The project is for a 250’ self-support tower within a parcel (00307840002) located east of Kapok St. This parcel has the agricultural zoning designation with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use and North Bell Meade Overlay districts. The proposed tower will be located within a 75’x75’ compound centered within a 100’x100’ lease area. The parcel is approximately 170’ wide and the center of the tower is being proposed 74’ from the eastern property line. • Details about Project (choose type that applies): Variance – We are seeking a variance from the ½ tower height setback requirement. The code states that a tower should be setback the greater of ½ the tower height or the collapse radius. Please note, we have a certified letter stating that, in the unlikely event of total separation, the proposed tower would result in collapse within a the 100’x100’ lease area. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name Kyle Lotze Title Project manager Email klotze@ignitewireless.com Phone 470-239-0846 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION 3.C.f Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Collier County, FL Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Dr Naples, FL 34104 Re: Variance Application for Wireless Telecommunications Tower CitySwitch II, LLC Kapok St./FLC009 To Whom It May Concern, We are hereby applying for a Setback Variance of the required half of the tower height setback (125ft) as required by LDC 2.03.08.A.2.a.3.x. of the Collier County Zoning Regulations in order to construct and maintain a Wireless Telecommunications Tower on the property located at Kapok Street, Naples, FL 34117. We are proud to say that the proposed structure will be utilized by AT&T to support the deployment of FirstNet. If unfamiliar, in 2017 the Department of Commerce and First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) signed a 25-year contract with AT&T to build the first nationwide wireless network for America’s First Responders. The FirstNet network is planned to cover all 50 states, five U.S. territories and the District of Columbia, including rural communities and tribal lands. In 2018, CitySwitch was honored to execute an agreement with AT&T to assist in building the infrastructure needed for the deployment of FirstNet as well as their existing wireless network needs. Additional information on FirstNet can be found online at https://firstnet.gov/ . Should you have any questions regarding the application and/or supporting documents provided, please feel free to contact Jim Alderman at 954-303-3170 or email at jjwirelessconsult@yahoo.com . 3.C.f Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Transforming public safety communications The First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) has entered into a public-private partnership with AT&T to build the first nationwide wireless broadband network dedicated to first responders for use in disasters, emergencies and daily public safety work. FirstNet provides initial funding, 20 MHz of spectrum and deep public safety expertise to the partnership. AT&T brings a proven track record and strong commitment to public safety, as well as the commercial expertise and nationwide resources to deploy, maintain and operate the network. This 25-year partnership offers the best overall value to America and its public safety responders – both from an investment perspective and in terms of the lifesaving technology it will put in the hands of law enforcement, fire and emergency medical personnel in communities across the nation. FirstNet will serve... FIRST RESPONDERS COMMUNITIES THE NATION IN fire, police, EMS counties, cities, tribal, rural ACROSS 50 states, territories & DC Technology first responders need to save lives, protect communities MODERNIZED PRIORITIZED SPECIALIZED innovative app & device ecosystem network improvements & upgrades commercially proven cybersecurity solutions emergency communications receive highest priority rapid buildout with public safety input nationwide public safety solutions leveraging existing infrastructure robust coverage where public safety needs it connectivity for advanced mobile data highly available customer care Learn more at FirstNet.gov/mediakit 5 3.C.f Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) info@firstnet.gov | www.firstnet.gov | 571-665-6100 TOP10 ASKED QUESTIONS FREQUENTLY 1. What is the First Responder Network Authority? The First Responder Network Authority is the independent authority established by Congress to deliver a nationwide broadband network dedicated to public safety. The Network is strengthening public safety users’ communications capabilities, enabling them to respond more quickly and effectively to accidents, disasters, and emergencies. The First Responder Network Authority is led by a Board of leaders and executives from the public safety community; federal, state, and local governments; and the technology, finance, and wireless sectors. It has a staff of about 200 employees with expertise in public safety, telecommunications, customer service, technology, procurement, and other areas needed to develop the Network. It is headquartered in Reston, VA, and has a technology center and lab in Boulder, CO. 2. What led to the creation of the First Responder Network Authority? The 9/11 terrorist attacks brought to the forefront the many communications challenges that first responders face during emergencies and disasters. These issues were captured in the 9/11 Commission Report, which identified gaps in emergency communications and recommended a nationwide network for law enforcement, fire, and emergency medical personnel communications. The public safety community united to fulfill the 9/11 Commission’s recommendation. Public safety organizations and associations advocated before Congress for a dedicated, reliable wireless network for first responders. Their advocacy efforts led to the passage of legislation in 2012 to create the agency to deploy the Network in all U.S. states and territories, including rural communities and tribal nations. 3. How has public safety been involved in the vision for the FirstNet network? Public safety officials have worked closely with the First Responder Network Authority since its inception in 2012 to ensure the Network meets first responders’ needs – today and in the future. The agency’s outreach and consultation efforts have connected the organization to more than 1.8 million first responders and state public safety and technology executives across the country. Specifically, the First Responder Network Authority has consulted extensively with state single points of contact (SPOCs) in each of the 50 U.S. states, 5 territories, and the District of Columbia, as well as local/municipal, tribal and federal public safety leaders. It also coordinates with public safety through the Public Safety Advisory Committee (PSAC), which provides guidance and subject matter expertise from a first responder perspective. Public safety leaders at the national, state and local levels continue to advocate for and support deployment of the Network. 4. How was AT&T selected to build, operate, and maintain the FirstNet network? The First Responder Network Authority and the Department of Interior made the 25-year award based on the determination of the overall best value solution for FirstNet and public safety. The buildup to the award included a fair, competitive procurement process that began in January 2016 with release of the Network RFP. The procurement process followed the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and encouraged offerors to provide innovative solutions that could meet or exceed the needs of public safety. The procurement was open to all entities, whether traditional wireless companies or new entrants, provided their proposal could meet the RFP’s statement of objectives. AT&T was selected on a best-value award that considered financial sustainability and was based on more than just a technically acceptable solution at the lowest cost. The evaluation of proposals assessed the offerors’ ability to submit a cost-effective and innovative model, and to meet or exceed the 16 objectives and evaluation factors outlined in the FirstNet RFP. 5. Why is the Network being built and operated through a public-private partnership? The First Responder Network Authority and AT&T are modernizing and improving public safety communications by leveraging private sector resources, infrastructure, and cost-saving synergies to deploy and operate the Network. This public-private model also helps keep costs down for American taxpayers. To do this, Congress used the sale of communications airwaves (or spectrum) to fund FirstNet’s initial operations and help start network deployment; the $7 billion FirstNet received in initial funding came from FCC spectrum auction revenue, not taxpayer funds. If the federal government were to build, maintain and operate this Network, the estimated cost would be tens of billions of dollars over 25 years. The Government Accountability Office has estimated it could cost up to $47 billion over 10 years to construct and operate the Network. With this partnership approach, the First Responder Network Authority and AT&T do not need any additional federal funding to build and operate the Network – it is a fully funded, self-sustaining Network. In return, America’s first responders get services far above and beyond what they have today over a first-class broadband network dedicated to their communications needs. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) info@firstnet.gov | www.firstnet.gov | 571-665-6100 6. What are the key terms this public-private partnership? Congress intended for the Network to be built and operated as a public-private partnership that brings together the best of the private sector, including commercial best practices, infrastructure, and resources – with the First Responder Network Authority’s public safety expertise. This approach will lead to a fully-funded, self-sustaining Network that will serve public safety for years to come. This business model is built upon the efficient use of resources, infrastructure, cost-saving synergies, and incentives, including: • 20 MHz of federally owned spectrum and $6.5 billion in initial funding to the partnership; in return AT&T will deploy and operate a nation- wide high-speed broadband network for public safety over 25 years. • AT&T will invest about $40 billion over the life of the contract to build, operate, deploy, and maintain the Network, and together with the First Responder Network Authority will help ensure the Network evolves with the needs of public safety. • AT&T can use FirstNet’s spectrum when it is not being used by public safety for other, commercial purposes. The company will prioritize first responders over any other commercial users. • First Responder Network Authority will oversee the contract to ensure it delivers innovation, technology and customer care to public safety through various mechanisms, including subscriber adoption targets, milestone buildouts, disincentive fees and other mechanisms outlined in the contract. 7. What will the FirstNet Network provide first responders that they don’t have today? Today, in emergencies and at large events, heavy public use can lead to wireless communications networks becoming overloaded and inaccessible. In those instances, public safety users are treated the same as any other commercial or enterprise user, and communications can be limited due to congestion and capacity issues. With the FirstNet Network, public safety will get a dedicated “fast lane” that provides highly secure communications every day and for every emergency. It will deliver specialized features to public safety that are not available on wireless networks today – such as priority access; preemption; more network capacity; and a resilient, hardened connection. The Network will deliver more than just a public-safety-dedicated wireless connection – it is also creating devices and apps ecosystems that will connect first responders to innovative, life-saving technologies. 8. How will the Network benefit first responders and help them do their jobs better? FirstNet will improve communications, response times and outcomes for first responders from coast-to-coast, in rural and urban areas, inland and on boarders – leading to safer, and more secure communities. The Network will provide first responders with innovation and robust capacity so they can take advantage of advanced technologies, tools and services during emergencies, such as: • Applications that allow first responders to reliably share videos, text messages, photos and other information during incidents in near real-time; • Advanced capabilities, like camera-equipped connected drones and robots, to deliver images of wildfires, floods or other events; • Improved location services to help with mapping capabilities during rescue and recovery operations; and • Wearables that could relay biometric data of a patient to the hospital or alert when a fire fighter is in distress. Network technology will also be tested and validated through the FirstNet Innovation and Test Lab, located in Boulder, CO, so first responders will have the proven tools they need in disasters and emergencies. 9. What’s happening with FirstNet now? All 50 states, five U.S. territories and Washington, D.C., have “opted in,” to FirstNet, meaning each has accepted its individual State Plan detailing how the network will be deployed in their state/territory. The First Responder Network Authority’s public-private partnership with AT&T provides first responders with immediate access to mission-critical capabilities over the FirstNet network. This includes priority and preemption features that give first responders their own “fast lane” on the public safety network to communicate and share information during emergencies, large events, or other situations when commercial networks could become congested. FirstNet is the only broadband network to provide ruthless preemption for public safety. Key FirstNet activities include: Expanding the Network and Building Out Band 14: The First Responder Network Authority has issued work orders to deploy the RANs. This gave AT&T the green light to expand FirstNet’s footprint and deploy Band 14 capacity and coverage throughout the nation, providing first responders with the bandwidth and mission critical connections they need to communicate, share information, and use innovative technologies every day and in every emergency. Driving public safety innovation: FirstNet is also unlocking a new technology marketplace for public safety, enabling first responders to benefit from advancements in innovation. The FirstNet App Catalog store will be filling up with FirstNet-approved mobile apps that are optimized for public safety use over the Network. Securing emergency communications: FirstNet’s first-of-its-kind core infrastructure will give first responders the dedicated, highly secure, non-commercial network they deserve. The FirstNet Core, delivered in March 2018, provides full encryption of public safety data over FirstNet and end-to-end cyber security. FirstNet subscribers also have access to a dedicated Security Operations Center, offering 24/7/365 support. Engaging with public safety: The First Responder Network Authority will continue to engage with public safety in the states, territories, federal agencies, and tribal nations to ensure the network meets their needs and incorporate their feedback in the design of future FirstNet products and services. 10. How can I learn more? Stay up-to-date on the First Responder Network Authority activities and the building and deployment of FirstNet at www.firstnet.gov. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) KAPOK STREET12906066NW 1/4, SEC. 15, T-49-S, R-27-ECOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDARAWLAND TOWER SURVEY PROJECT NO.19-1586SMW Engineering Group, Inc. FDH-NC158 Business Center Drive Birmingham, Alabama 35244 Ph: 205-252-6985www.smweng.com 3.C.fPacket Pg. 465Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) NW 1/4, SEC. 15, T-49-S, R-27-ECOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDARAWLAND TOWER SURVEY PROJECT NO.19-1586SMW Engineering Group, Inc.SECTION OVERVIEWNOT TO SCALEFDH-NC158 Business Center Drive Birmingham, Alabama 35244 Ph: 205-252-6985www.smweng.comKAPOK STREET129060663.C.fPacket Pg. 466Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) NW 1/4, SEC. 15, T-49-S, R-27-ECOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDARAWLAND TOWER SURVEY PROJECT NO.19-1586SMW Engineering Group, Inc.PARENT TRACT OVERVIEWNOT TO SCALEFDH-NC158 Business Center Drive Birmingham, Alabama 35244 Ph: 205-252-6985www.smweng.com ’’KAPOK STREET129060663.C.fPacket Pg. 467Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 2.03.01 - Agricultural Districts. A. Rural Agricultural District (A). The purpose and intent of the rural agricultural district (A) is to provide lands for agricultural, pastoral, and rural land uses by accommodating traditional agricultural, agricultural related activities and facilities, support facilities related to agricultural needs, and conservation uses. Uses that are generally considered compatible to agricultural uses that would not endanger or damage the agricultural, environmental, potable water, or wildlife resources of the County, are permissible as conditional uses in the A district. The A district corresponds to and implements the Agricultural/Rural land use designation on the future land use map of the Collier County GMP, and in some instances, may occur in the designated urban area. The maximum density permissible in the rural agricultural district within the urban mixed use district shall be guided, in part, by the density rating system contained in the future land use element of the GMP. The maximum density permissible or permitted in A district shall not exceed the density permissible under the density rating system. The maximum density permissible in the A district within the agricultural/rural district of the future land use element of the Collier County GMP shall be consistent with and not exceed the density permissible or permitted under the agricultural/rural district of the future land use element. 1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the uses that are allowable as accessory or conditional uses in the rural agricultural district (A). a. Permitted uses. 1. Single-family dwelling . 2. Agricultural activities, including, but not limited to: Crop raising; horticulture; fruit and nut production; forestry; groves; nurseries; ranching; beekeeping; poultry and egg production; milk production; livestock raising, and aquaculture for native species subject to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission permits. i. The following permitted uses shall only be allowed on parcels 20 acres in size or greater: a) dairying; b) ranching; c) poultry and egg production; d) milk production; e) livestock raising; and f) animal breeding, raising, training, stabling or kenneling . ii. On parcels less than 20 acres in size, individual property owners are not precluded from the keeping of the following for personal use and not in association with a commercial agricultural activity provided there are no open feed lots: a) Fowl or poultry, not to exceed 25 in total number; and b) Horses and livestock (except for hogs) not to exceed two such animals for each acre. i. Notwithstanding the above, hog(s) may be kept for a 16 week period in preparation for showing and sale at the annual Collier County Fair and/or the Immokalee Livestock show. The following standards shall apply: a) One hog per child enrolled in a 4-H Youth Development Program, Collier County Fair Program or similar program is permitted. In no case shall there be more than 2 hogs per acre. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) b) Premises shall be fenced and maintained in a clean, healthful, and sanitary condition. c) Premises or roofed structure used for the sheltering, feeding, or confinement of such animals shall be setback a minimum of 30 feet from lot lines and a minimum of 100 feet from any dwelling unit on an adjacent parcel of land. d) Hog(s) shall not be returned to the property once removed for showing and/or sale. 3. Wholesale reptile breeding and raising (non-venomous), subject to the following standards: i. Minimum 20 acre parcel size; ii. Any roofed structure used for the shelter and/or feeding of such reptiles shall be located a minimum of 100 feet from any lot line . 4. Wildlife management, plant and wildlife conservancies, wildlife refuges and sanctuaries. 5. Conservation uses. 6. Oil and gas exploration subject to state drilling permits and Collier County site development plan review procedures. 7. Family care facilities , subject to section 5.05.04. 8. Communications towers up to specified height, subject to section 5.05.09. 9. Essential services , as set forth in section 2.01.03. 10. Schools, public, including " Educational plants ." b. Accessory uses. 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the uses permitted as of right in the A district. 2. Farm labor housing, subject to section 5.05.03. 3. Retail sale of fresh, unprocessed agricultural products , grown primarily on the property and subject to a review of traffic circulation, parking, and safety concerns pursuant to the submission of a site improvement plan as provided for in section 10.02.03. 4. Packinghouse or similar agricultural processing of farm products produced on the property subject to the following restrictions: i. Agricultural packing, processing or similar facilities shall be located on a major or minor arterial street , or shall have access to an arterial street by a public street that does not abut properties zoned RSF-1 thru RSF-6, RMF-6, RMF-12, RMF-16, RT, VR, MH, TTRVC and PUD or are residentially used. ii. A buffer yard of not less than 150 feet in width shall be provided along each boundary of the site which abuts any residentially zoned or used property, and shall contain an Alternative B type buffer as defined within section 4.06.00. Such buffer and buffer yard shall be in lieu of front, side, or rear yards on that portion of the lot which abuts those districts and uses identified in subsection 2.03.01 A.1.b. 4. i. above. iii. The facility shall emit no noxious, toxic, or corrosive dust, dirt, fumes, vapors, or gases which can cause damage to human health, to animals or vegetation, or to other forms of property beyond the lot line of the use creating the emission. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) iv. A site development plan shall be provided in accordance with section 10.02.03. 5. Excavation and related processing and production subject to the following criteria: i. The activity is clearly incidental to the agricultural development of the property. ii. The affected area is within a surface water management system for agricultural use as permitted by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). iii. The amount of excavated material removed from the site cannot exceed 4,000 cubic yards. Amounts in excess of 4,000 cubic yards shall require conditional use approval for earthmining, pursuant to the procedures and conditions set forth in LDC section 10.08.00 and the Administrative Code. 6. Guesthouses, subject to section 5.03.03. 7. Private boathouses and docks on lake, canal or waterway lots, subject to section 5.03.06. 8. Use of a mobile home as a temporary residence while a permanent single-family dwelling is being constructed, subject to the following: i. Receipt of a temporary use permit from the Development Services Director, pursuant to section 5.04.04, that allows for use of a mobile home while a permanent single-family dwelling is being built; ii. Assurance that the temporary use permit for the mobile home will expire at the same time of the building permit for the single-family dwelling, or upon the completion of the single-family dwelling, whichever comes first; iii. Proof that prior to the issuance of a final certificate of occupancy for the single- family dwelling, the mobile home is removed from the premises; and iv. The mobile home must be removed at the termination of the permitted period. 9. Use of a mobile home as a residence in conjunction with bona fide agricultural activities subject to the following: i. The applicant shall submit a completed application to the site development review director, or his designee, for approval of a temporary use permit to utilize a mobile home as a residence in conjunction with a bona fide commercial agricultural activity as described in subsection 2.03.01 A.1.2. Included with this application shall be a conceptual plot plan of the subject property depicting the location of the proposed mobile home ; the distance of the proposed mobile home to all property lines and existing or proposed structures ; and, the location, acreage breakdown, type and any intended phasing plan for the bona fide agricultural activity. ii. The receipt of any and all local, state, and federal permits required for the agricultural use and/or to place the mobile home on the subject site including, but not limited to, an agricultural clearing permit, building permit(s), ST permits, and the like. iii. The use of the mobile home shall be permitted on a temporary basis only, not to exceed the duration of the bona fide commercial agricultural activity for which the mobile home is an accessory use . The initial temporary use permit may be issued for a maximum of three years, and may, upon submission of a written request accompanied by the applicable fee, be renewed annually thereafter provided that there is continuing operation of the bona fide commercial agricultural activities. iv. The applicant utilizing, for the bona fide commercial agricultural activity, a tract of land a minimum of five acres in size. Any property lying within public road rights- of-way shall not be included in the minimum acreage calculations. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) v. A mobile home , for which a temporary use permit in conjunction with a bona fide commercial agricultural activity is requested, shall not be located closer than 100 feet from any county highway right-of-way line, 200 feet from any state highway right-of-way , or 500 feet from any federal highway right-of-way line. 10. Recreational facilities that serve as an integral part of a residential development and have been designated, reviewed and approved on a site development plan or subdivision master plan for that development . Recreational facilities may include but are not limited to golf course, clubhouse, community center building and tennis facilities, parks , playgrounds and playfields. c. Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted as conditional uses in the rural agricultural district (A), subject to the standards and procedures established in LDC section 10.08.00 and the Administrative Code. 1. Extraction or earthmining, and related processing and production not incidental to the agricultural development of the property. NOTE: "Extraction related processing and production" is not related to "Oil extraction and related processing" as defined in this Code. 2. Sawmills. 3. Zoo, aquarium, aviary, botanical garden, or other similar uses. 4. Hunting cabins. 5. Aquaculture for nonnative or exotic species, subject to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission permits. 6. Wholesale reptile breeding or raising (venomous) subject to the following standards; i. Minimum 20 acre parcel size. ii. Any roofed structure used for the shelter and/or feeding of such reptiles shall be located at a minimum of 100 feet away from any lot line . 7. Churches . 8. Private landing strips for general aviation, subject to any relevant state and federal regulations. 9. Cemeteries. 10. Schools, private. 11. Child care centers and adult day care centers . 12. Collection and transfer sites for resource recovery. 13. Communication towers above specified height, subject to section 5.05.09. 14. Social and fraternal organizations. 15. Veterinary clinic. 16. Group care facilities (category I and II); care units ; nursing homes; assisted living facilities pursuant to § 400.402 F.S. and ch. 58A-5 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to § 651 F.S. and ch. 4-193 F.A.C., all subject to section 5.05.04 when located within the Urban Designated Area on the Future Land Use Map to the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 17. Golf courses and/or golf driving ranges. 18. Oil and gas field development and production subject to state field development permits. 19. Sports instructional schools and camps. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 20. Sporting and recreational camps. 21. Retail plant nurseries subject to the following conditions: i. Retail sales shall be limited primarily to the sale of plants, decorative products such as mulch or stone, fertilizers, pesticides, and other products and tools accessory to or required for the planting or maintenance of said plants. ii. Additionally, the sale of fresh produce is permissible at retail plant nurseries as an incidental use of the property as a retail plant nursery. iii. The sale of large power equipment such as lawn mowers, tractors, and the like shall not be permitted in association with a retail plant nursery in the rural agricultural district. 22. Asphaltic and concrete batch making plants subject to the following conditions: i. Asphaltic or concrete batch making plants may be permitted within the area designated agricultural on the future land use map of the future land use element of the growth management plan. ii. The minimum site area shall not be less than ten acres. iii. Principal access shall be from a street designated collector or higher classification. iv. Raw materials storage, plant location and general operations around the plant shall not be located or conducted within 100 feet of any exterior boundary. v. The height of raw material storage facilities shall not exceed a height of fifty (50) feet. vi. Hours of operation shall be limited to two (2) hours before sunrise to sunset. vii. The minimum setback from the principal road frontage shall be 150 feet for operational facilities and seventy-five (75) feet for supporting administrative offices and associated parking. viii. An earthen berm achieving a vertical height of eight feet or equivalent vegetative screen with eighty (80) percent opacity one (1) year after issuance of certificate of occupancy shall be constructed or created around the entire perimeter of the property. ix. The plant should not be located within the Greenline Area of Concern for the Florida State Park System as established by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): within the Area of Critical State Concern as depicted on the Future Land Use Map GMP; within 1,000 feet of a natural reservation ; or within any County, State or federal jurisdictional wetland area. 23. Cultural, ecological, or recreational facilities that provide opportunities for educational experience, eco-tourism or agri-tourism and their related modes of transporting participants, viewers or patrons where applicable, subject to all applicable federal, state and local permits. Tour operations, such as, but not limited to airboats, swamp buggies, horses and similar modes of transportation, shall be subject to the following criteria: i. Permits or letters of exemption from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District shall be presented to the planning services director prior to site development plan approval. ii. The petitioner shall post the property along the entire property line with no trespassing signs approximately every 300 yards. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) iii. The petitioner shall utilize only trails identified and approved on the site development plan . Any existing trails shall be utilized before the establishment of new trails. iv. Motor vehicles shall be equipped with engines which include spark arrestors and mufflers designed to reduce noise. v. The maximum size of any vehicle, the number of vehicles, and the passenger capacity of any vehicle shall be determined by the board of zoning appeals during the conditional use process. vi. Motor vehicles shall be permitted to operate during daylight hours which means, one hour after sunrise to one hour before sunset. vii. Molestation of wildlife, including feeding, shall be prohibited. viii. Vehicles shall comply with state and United States Coast Guard regulations, if applicable. ix. The board of zoning appeals shall review such a conditional use for tour operations, annually. If during the review, at an advertised public hearing, it is determined by the board of zoning appeals that the tour operation is detrimental to the environment, and no adequate corrective action has been taken by the petitioner, the board of zoning appeals may rescind the conditional use . 24. Agricultural activities on parcels less than 20 acres in size: i. animal breeding, raising, training, stabling, or kenneling. ii. dairying; iii. livestock raising; iv. milk production; v. poultry and egg production; and vi. ranching. 25. The commercial production, raising or breeding of exotic animals, other than animals typically used for agricultural purposes or production, subject to the following standards: i. Minimum 20 acre parcel size. ii. Any roofed structure used for the shelter and/or feeding of such animals shall be located a minimum of 100 feet from any lot line . 26. Essential services , as set forth in subsection 2.01.03 G. 27. Model homes and model sales centers, subject to compliance with all other LDC requirements, to include but not limited to section 5.04.04. 28. Ancillary plants . d. Prohibited uses. 1. Owning, maintaining or operating any facility or part thereof for the following purposes is prohibited: a) Fighting or baiting any animal by the owner of such facility or any other person or entity. b) Raising any animal or animals intended to be ultimately used or used for fighting or baiting purposes. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) c) For purposes of this subsection, the term baiting is defined as set forth in § 828.122(2)(a), F.S., as it may be amended from time to time. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 2.03.08 - Rural Fringe Zoning Districts A. Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District (RFMU District). 1. Purpose and scope. The purpose and intent of the RFMU District is to provide a transition between the Urban and Estates Designated lands and between the Urban and Agricultural/Rural and Conservation designated lands farther to the east. The RFMU District employs a balanced approach, including both regulations and incentives, to protect natural resources and private property rights, providing for large areas of open space, and allowing, in designated areas, appropriate types, density and intensity of development. The RFMU District allows for a mixture of urban and rural levels of service, including limited extension of central water and sewer, schools, recreational facilities, commercial uses, and essential services deemed necessary to serve the residents of the RFMU District. The innovative planning and development techniques which are required and/or encouraged within the RFMU District were developed to preserve existing natural resources, including habitat for listed species, to retain a rural, pastoral, or park-like appearance from the major public rights-of-way, and to protect private property rights. a. Establishment of RFMU Zoning Overlay District. In order to implement the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) designation in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP, the RFMU District shall be designated as "RFMUO" on the Official Zoning Atlas and is hereby established. The RFMU District replaces the underlying zoning district where that underlying zoning district is A, Rural Agricultural, except where development standards are omitted in the RFMU District. The County-wide Future Land Use Map is located in the Future Land Use Element of the GMP or can be obtained from the Growth Management Department, located at 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104. The lands included in the RFMU District and to which LDC section 2.03.08 apply are depicted by the following map: 3.C.f Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) b. Exemptions. The requirements, limitations and allowances of this section shall not apply to, affect or limit the continuation of existing uses. Existing uses shall include: those uses for which all required permits were issued prior to June 19, 2002; or, projects for which a Conditional use has been approved by the County prior to June 19, 2002; or, projects for which a Rezone petition has been approved by the County prior to June 19, 2002 - inclusive of all lands not zoned A, Rural Agricultural; or, land use petitions for which a completed application has been submitted prior to June 19, 2002. The continuation of existing uses shall include on-site expansions of those uses if such expansions are 3.C.f Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) consistent with or clearly ancillary to the existing uses. Hereafter, such previously approved developments shall be deemed to be consistent with the Plan's Goals, Objectives and Policies for the RFMUD , and they may be built out in accordance with their previously approved plans. Changes to these previous approvals shall also be deemed consistent with the Plan's Goals, Policies and Objectives for the RFMUD as long as they do not result in an increase in development density or intensity. c. Ordinance superceded. Ordinance Number 98-17 is hereby expressly superceded. Any development in the area formerly subject to that ordinance shall henceforth conform to the provisions of this Section and all other provisions of this Code that are applicable to development within the RFMU district . 2. RFMU receiving lands. RFMU receiving lands are those lands within the RFMU district that have been identified as being most appropriate for development and to which residential development units may be transferred from RFMU sending lands . Based on the evaluation of available data, RFMU receiving lands have a lesser degree of environmental or listed species habitat value than RFMU sending lands and generally have been disturbed through development or previous or existing agricultural operations. Various incentives are employed to direct development into RFMU receiving lands and away from RFMU sending lands , thereby maximizing native vegetation and habitat preservation and restoration. Such incentives include, but are not limited to: the TDR process; clustered development ; density bonus incentives; and, provisions for central sewer and water. Within RFMU receiving lands , the following standards shall apply, except as noted in subsection 2.03.08 A.1. above, or as more specifically provided in an applicable PUD. a. Outside rural villages . (1) NBMO Exemption. Except as specifically provided herein NBMO Receiving Lands are only subject to the provisions of section 2.03.08 C. (2) Maximum Density . (a) Base density . The base residential density allowable within RFMU receiving lands , exclusive of the applicable density blending provisions set forth in section 2.05.02, is 1 unit per 5 gross acres (0.2 dwelling units per acre) or, for those legal nonconforming lots or parcels in existence as of June 22, 1999, 1 unit per lot or parcel . (b) Additional density i. Additional Density Allowed Through the TDR Process. Outside of rural villages , the maximum density achievable in RFMU Receiving Lands through TDR credits and TDR Bonus Credits is 1 dwelling unit per acre. a) Clustering Required. Where the transfer of development rights is employed to increase residential density within RFMU receiving lands , such residential development shall be clustered in accordance with the following provisions: i) Central water and sewer shall be extended to the project. Where County sewer or water services may not be available concurrent with development in RFMU receiving lands , interim private water and sewer facilities may be approved. ii) The maximum lot size allowable for a single-family detached dwelling unit is 1 acre. iii) The clustered development shall be located on the site so as to provide to the greatest degree practicable: protection for listed species habitat; preservation of the highest quality native vegetation ; connectivity to adjacent natural reservations or 3.C.f Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) preservation areas on adjacent developments; and, creation, maintenance or enhancement of wildlife corridors. b) Minimum Project Size. The minimum project size required in order to receive transferred dwelling units is 40 contiguous acres. c) Emergency Preparedness. In order to reduce the likelihood of threat to life and property from a tropical storm or hurricane event any development approved under the provisions of this section shall demonstrate that adequate emergency preparedness and disaster prevention measures have been taken by, at a minimum: i) Designing community facilities, schools, or other public buildings to serve as storm shelters if located outside of areas that may experience inundation during a Category 1 or worse storm event. While the need to utilize such shelters will be determined on a case-by-case basis, areas which are susceptible to inundation during such storm events are identified on the Sea, Lake, and Overland Surge from Hurricane (SLOSH) Map for Collier County. ii) Evaluating impacts on evacuation routes, if any, and working with the Collier County Emergency Management staff to develop an Emergency Preparedness Plan to include provisions for storm shelter space, a plan for emergency evacuation, and other provisions that may be deemed appropriate and necessary to mitigate against a potential disaster. iii) Working with the Florida Division of Forestry, Collier County Emergency Management staff, and the managers of any adjacent or nearby public lands, to develop a Wildfire Prevention and Mitigation Plan that will reduce the likelihood of threat to life and property from wildfires. This plan shall address, at a minimum: project structural design; the use of materials and location of structures so as to reduce wildfire threat; firebreaks and buffers ; water features; and, the rationale for prescribed burning on adjacent or nearby lands. ii. Additional density Allowed Through Other Density Bonuses. Once a density of one (1) unit per acre is achieved through the use of TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits , additional density may be achieved as follows: a) A density bonus of 0.1 unit per acre shall be allowed for the preservation of additional native vegetation as set forth in Section 3.05.07 E. 1. of the Code. b) A density bonus of 0.1 units per acre shall be allowed for projects that incorporate those additional wetlands mitigation measures set forth in Section 3.05.07 F. 4. b. of the Code. (3) Allowable Uses. (a) Uses Permitted as of Right. The following uses are permitted as of right, or as uses accessory to permitted uses: i. Agricultural activities, including, but not limited to: Crop raising; horticulture; fruit and nut production; forestry; groves; nurseries; ranching; beekeeping; poultry and egg production; milk production; livestock raising, and aquaculture for native species subject to the State of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission permits. Owning, maintaining or operating any facility or part thereof for the following purposes is prohibited: 3.C.f Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) a) Fighting or baiting any animal by the owner of such facility or any other person or entity. b) Raising any animal or animals intended to be ultimately used or used for fighting or baiting purposes. c) For purposes of this subsection, the term baiting is defined as set forth in § 828.122(2)(a), F.S., as it may be amended from time to time. ii. Single-family residential dwelling units , including mobile homes where a mobile home Zoning Overlay exists. iii. Multi-family residential structures , if clustering is employed. iv. Rural villages , subject to the provisions set forth under section 2.03.08 A.2.b. below. v. Dormitories, duplexes and other types of staff housing, as may be incidental to, and in support of, conservation uses . vi. Family Care Facilities: 1 unit per 5 acres and subject to section 5.05.04 of this Code. vii. Staff housing as may be incidental to, and in support of, safety service facilities and essential services . viii. Farm labor housing limited to 10 acres in any single location: a) Single family/ duplex / mobile home : 11 dwelling units per acre; and b) Multifamily/dormitory: 22 dwelling units /beds per acre. ix. Sporting and Recreational camps not to exceed 1 cabin/lodging unit per 5 gross acres. x. Those essential services identified as permitted uses in section 2.01.03 (A) and in accordance with the provisions, conditions and limitations set forth therein. xi. Golf courses or driving ranges, subject to the following standards: a) The minimum density shall be as follows: i) For golf course projects: one (1) dwelling unit per five (5) gross acres. ii) For golf course projects not utilizing density blending Provisions set forth in the Density Rating System of the FLUE, including free standing golf courses: one TDR credit or TDR Bonus credit shall be required per five (5) gross acres for the land area utilized as part of the golf course, including the clubhouse area, rough, fairways, greens, and lakes, but excluding any area dedicated as conservation, which is non-irrigated and retained in a natural state. A TDR credit or TDR Bonus credit used to entitle golf course acreage may not also be used to entitle a residential dwelling unit . b) Golf courses shall be designed, constructed, and managed in accordance with the Best Management Practices of Audubon International's Gold Signature Program. The project shall demonstrate that the Principles for Resource Management required by the Gold Signature Program (Site Specific Assessment, Habitat Sensitivity, Native and Naturalized Plants and Natural Landscaping, Water Conservation, Waste Management. Energy Conservation & Renewable 3.C.f Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Energy Sources, Transportation, Greenspace and Corridors, Agriculture, and BUILDING Design) have been incorporated into the golf course's design and operational procedures. c) In order to prevent the contamination of soil, surface water and ground water by the materials stored and handled by golf course maintenance operations, golf courses shall comply with the Best Management Practices for Golf Course Maintenance Departments, prepared by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, May 1995. d) To protect ground and surface water quality from fertilizer and pesticide usage, golf courses shall demonstrate the following management practices: i) The use of slow release nitrogen sources; ii) The use of soil and plant tissue analysis to adjust timing and amount of fertilization applications; iii) The use of an integrated pest management program using both biological and chemical agents to control various pests; iv) The coordination of pesticide applications with the timing and application of irrigation water; and v) The use of the procedure contained in IFAS Circular 1011, Managing Pesticides for Golf Course Maintenance and Water Quality Protection, May 1991 (revised 1995) to select pesticides that will have a minimum adverse impact on water quality. e) To ensure water conservation, golf courses shall incorporate the following in their design and operation: i) Irrigation systems shall be designed to use weather station information and moisture-sensing systems to determine the optimum amount of irrigation water needed considering soil moisture and evapotranspiration rates. ii) Golf courses shall utilize treated effluent reuse water consistent with Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element Objective 1.4 and its policies to the extent that a sufficient amount of such water is available and the piping or other conveyance necessary for delivery of such water exists at a location abutting the golf course property boundary or within 50 feet of such boundary and accessible via existing rights of way or easements ; iii) Native plants shall be used exclusively except for special purpose areas such as golf greens, fairways, and building sites. Within these excepted areas, landscaping plans shall require that at least 75% of the trees and 50% of the shrubs be freeze-tolerant native Floridian species. At least 75% of the required native trees and shrubs shall also be drought tolerant species. f) Stormwater management ponds shall be designed to mimic the functions of natural systems: by establishing shorelines that are sinuous in configuration in order to provide increased length and diversity of the littoral zone. A Littoral shelf shall be established to provide a feeding area for water dependent avian species. The combined length of vertical and rip-rapped walls shall be limited to 25% of the shoreline . Credits to the site preservation area requirements, on an acre- to- acre basis, shall be given for littoral shelves that exceed these littoral shelf area requirements. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) g) Site preservation and native vegetation retention requirements shall be those set forth in section 4.06.00 of this Code. xii. Public educational plants and ancillary plants. xiii. Oil and gas exploration, subject to applicable state and federal drilling permits and Collier County non-environmental site development plan review procedures. Directional-drilling and/or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized in order to minimize impacts to native habitats, where determined to be practicable. This requirement shall be deemed satisfied upon issuance of a state permit in compliance with the criteria established in Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on Oct. 3, 2005 [ the effective date of this provision ], regardless of whether the activity occurs within the Big Cypress Watershed, as defined in Rule 62C-30.001(2), F.A.C. All applicable Collier County environmental permitting requirements shall be considered satisfied by evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County, so long as the state permits comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C. For those areas of Collier County outside the boundary of the Big Cypress Watershed, the applicant shall be responsible for convening the Big Cypress Swamp Advisory Committee as set forth in Section 377.42, F.S., to assure compliance with Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., even if outside the defined Big Cypress Watershed. All oil and gas access roads shall be constructed and protected from unauthorized uses according to the standards established in Rule 62C- 30.005(2)(a)(1) through (12), F.A.C. xiv. Park, open space, and recreational uses. xv. Private schools. (b) Accessory uses . i. Accessory uses as set forth in section 2.03.01 of this Code. ii. Accessory uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right in the RFMU district . iii. Recreational facilities that serve as an integral part of a residential development and have been designated, reviewed, and approved on a site development plan or preliminary subdivision plat for that development. Recreational facilities may include, but are not limited to clubhouse, community center building , tennis facilities, playgrounds and playfields. (c) Conditional uses . The following uses are permissible as conditional uses subject to the standards and procedures established in section 10.08.00. i. Oil and gas field development and production, subject to state field development permits and Collier County non-environmental site development plan review procedures. Directional-drilling and/or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized in order to minimize impacts to native habitats, where determined to be practicable. This requirement shall be deemed satisfied upon issuance of a state permit in compliance with the criteria established in Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., regardless of whether the activity occurs within the Big Cypress Watershed, as defined in Rule 62C-30.001(2), F.A.C. All applicable Collier County environmental permitting requirements shall be considered satisfied by evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County, so long as the state permits comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C. For those areas of Collier County outside the boundary of the Big Cypress 3.C.f Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Watershed, the applicant shall be responsible for convening the Big Cypress Swamp Advisory Committee as set forth in Section 377.42, F.S., to assure compliance with Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., even if outside the defined Big Cypress Watershed. All oil and gas access roads shall be constructed and protected from unauthorized uses according to the standards established in Rule 62-30.005(2)(a)(1) through (12), F.A.C. ii. Group care facilities and other care housing facilities, other than family care facilities, subject to a maximum floor area ratio of 0.45. iii. Zoos, aquariums, and botanical gardens, and similar uses. iv. Facilities for the collection, transfer, processing, and reduction of solid waste . v. Community facilities, such as, places of worship, childcare facilities, cemeteries, and social and fraternal organizations. vi. Travel trailer recreation vehicle parks, subject to the following criteria: a) the site is adjacent to an existing travel trailer recreational vehicle site; and b) the site is no greater than 100% of the size of the existing adjacent park site. vii. Those essential services identified in sections 2.01.03 (G)(1) and (G)(3). viii. In RFMU receiving lands other than those within the NBMO, asphalt and concrete batch-making plants. ix. In RFMU receiving lands other than those within the NBMO, earth mining and extraction. (4) Design Standards. (a) Development Not Utilizing clustering : i. Minimum lot area: 5 Acres. ii. Minimum lot width: 165 Feet. iii. Minimum yard requirements: a) Front yard : 50 feet b) Side yard : 30 feet c) Rear yard : 50 feet d) Nonconforming lots in existence as of June 22, 1999: i) Front yard : 40 feet. ii) Side yard : 10 percent of lot width, not to exceed 20 feet on each side. iii) Rear yard : 50 feet. (b) Clustered development : i. Lot areas and widths: a) single-family i) Minimum lot area: 4,500 square feet. ii) Maximum lot area: One Acre. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) iii) Minimum lot width: Interior lots 40 feet. iv. Maximum lot width: 150 feet. b) multi-family i) Minimum lot area: One Acre. ii) Maximum lot area: None. iii) Minimum lot width: 150 feet. iv) Maximum lot width: None. ii. Minimum yard requirements a) single-family. Each single-family lot or parcel minimum yard requirement shall be established within an approved PUD, or shall comply with the following standards: i) Front: 20 feet (Note front yard Set back may be reduced to 10 feet where parking for the unit is accessed via a rear ally. ii) Side: 6 feet iii) Rear: 15 feet iv) Accessory: Per section 4.02.01. b) multi-family. For each multi-family lot or parcel minimum yard shall be established within an approved PUD, or shall comply with the following standards: i) Setback from Arterial or Collector roadway(s): no multi-family dwelling may be located closer than 200 feet to a roadway classified or defined as an arterial roadway or 100 feet from any roadway classified or defined as a collector roadway. ii) Front: 30 feet. iii) Rear: 30 feet. iv) Side yard /separation between any multi-family building s: One- half of the building height or 15 feet, whichever is greater. v) Accessory: Per section 4.02.01. iii. Height limitations a) Principal structures i) Single Family: 35 feet. ii) Multi-family: Five Stories not to exceed 60 feet. iii) Other structures : 35 feet except for golf course/community clubhouses, which may be 50 feet in height. b) Accessory structures . 20 feet, except for screen enclosures, which may be the same height as the principal structure . iv. Minimum floor space a) Single Family: 800 square feet b) Multi-family: i) Efficiency: 450 Square feet ii) One Bedroom: 600 square feet 3.C.f Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) iii) Two or More Bedrooms: 800 square feet (c) Parking. As required in Chapter 4 of this Code. (d) Landscaping. As required in Chapter 4 of this Code. (e) Signs . As required in section 5.06.00 of this Code. (5) Native vegetation Retention. As required in section 4.06.00 of this Code. (6) Usable open space . (a) Projects of 40 or more acres in size shall provide a minimum of 70% usable open space . (b) Usable open space includes active or passive recreation areas such as parks, playgrounds, golf courses, waterways, lakes, nature trails, and other similar open spaces . Usable open space shall also include areas set aside for conservation or preservation of native vegetation and landscape areas. (c) Open water beyond the perimeter of the site, street right-of-way , except where dedicated or donated for public uses, driveways , off- street parking and loading areas, shall not be counted towards required usable open space . b. Rural villages . Rural villages , including rural villages within the NBMO, may be approved within the boundaries of RFMU receiving lands , subject to the following: (1) Allowable Uses: (a) All permitted uses identified in section 2.03.08A.2.a.(3)(a), when specifically identified in, and approved as part of, a RURAL VILLAGE PUD. (b) CONDITIONAL USES 1 through 5, and 7 identified in section 2.03.08A.2.a.(3)(c), when specifically identified in, and approved as part of a RURAL VILLAGE PUD. (c) All permitted and accessory uses listed in the C-4 General Commercial District, section 2.03.02 (E), subject to the design guidelines and development standards set forth in this Section. (d) Research and Technology Parks, with a minimum size of 19 acres and a maximum size of 4% of the total rural village acreage, subject to the design guidelines and development standards set forth herein, the applicable standards contained in section 2.03.06 C.7. Research and technology park planned unit development district guidelines and development standards, and further subject to the following: i. Research and Technology Parks shall be permitted to include up to 20% of the total acreage for non-target industry uses of the type identified in paragraph (3) below; and, up to 20% of the total acreage for workforce housing , except as provided in paragraph (7) below. At a minimum, 60% of the total park acreage must be devoted to target industry uses identified in paragraph (2) below. The specific percentage and mix of each category of use shall be determined at the time of rural village PUD rezoning. ii. The target industries identified by the Economic development Council of Collier County are aviation/aerospace industry, health technology industry and information technology industry, and include the following uses: software development and programming; internet technologies and electronic commerce; multimedia activities and CD-ROM development ; data and information processing; call center and customer support activities; professional services that are export based such as laboratory research or testing activities; light manufacturing in the high tech target sectors of aviation/aerospace and health and information technologies; office uses in 3.C.f Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) connection with on-site research; development testing and related manufacturing; general administrative offices of a research and development firm; educational, scientific and research organizations; production facilities and operations. iii. Non-target industry uses may include hotels at a density consistent with the provisions in section 2.03.02 and those uses in the C-1 through C-3 Zoning Districts that provide support services to the target industries such as general office, banks, fitness centers, personal and professional services, medical, financial and convenience sales and services, computer related businesses and services, employee training, technical conferencing, day care centers, restaurants and corporate and government offices. iv. The rural village PUD shall include standards for the development of individual building parcels within the park and general standards shall be adopted for pedestrian and vehicular interconnections, buffering , landscaping, open spaces , signage, lighting, screening of outdoor storage, parking and access management, all to be consistent with and compatible to the other uses within the village. v. The Research and Technology Park must be adjacent to, and have direct access via an existing or developer constructed local road to an arterial or collector roadway. The portion of the local roadway intended to provide access to the Research and Technology Park shall not be within a residential neighborhood and does not service a predominately residential area. vi. The Research and Technology Park shall be compatible with surrounding land uses. Accordingly, it shall be separated from any residentially zoned or designated land within the rural village by a minimum Type "C" landscape buffer , as set forth in section 4.06.00 of this Code. vii. Whenever workforce housing is provided, it shall be fully integrated with other compatible uses in the park through mixed-use buildings and/or through pedestrian and vehicular interconnections. viii. Building permits for non-target industry uses identified in paragraph (3) above shall not be issued prior to issuance of the first building permit for a target industry use. (e) Any other use deemed by the Board of County Commissioner to be appropriate and compatible within a rural village . (2) Mix of Neighborhood Types. Rural villages shall be comprised of several neighborhoods designed in a compact nature such that a majority of residential development is within one-quarter mile of a neighborhood center . neighborhood centers may include small-scale service retail and office uses, and shall include a public park, square, or green. Village centers shall be designed to serve the retail, office, civic, government uses and service needs of the residents of the rural village . The village center shall be the primary location for commercial uses. rural villages shall be surrounded by a green belt in order to protect the character of the rural landscape and to provide separation between rural villages and the low density rural development , agricultural uses , and conservation lands that may surround the rural village . Rural villages shall be designed to include the following: a mixture of residential housing types; institutional and/or commercial uses; and recreational uses, all of which shall be sufficient to serve the residents of the rural village and the surrounding lands. In addition, except as specifically provided otherwise for rural villages within the NBMO, the following criteria and conditions shall apply to all rural villages . 3.C.f Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) (a) Allocation of Land Uses. Specific allocations for land uses including residential, commercial and other non-residential uses within rural villages , shall include, but are not limited to: i. A mixture of housing types, including attached and/or detached single family, as well as multi-family shall be provided within a rural village . A minimum of 0.2 units per acre in a rural village shall be affordable housing , of which at least 0.1 units per acre shall be workforce housing . The rural village shall be designed so as to disperse the Affordable and workforce housing units throughout the Village rather than concentrate them in a single location. ii. A mixture of recreational uses, including parks and village greens. iii. Civic, community, and other institutional uses. iv. A mixture of lot sizes, with a design that includes more compact development and attached dwelling units within neighborhood centers and the village center , and reduced net densities and increasingly larger lot sizes for detached residential dwellings generally occurring as development extends outward from the village center . v. A mixture of retail, office, and services uses. vi. If requested by the Collier County School Board during the PUD and/or DRI review process, school sites shall be provided and shall be located to serve a maximum number of residential dwelling units within walking distance to the schools, subject to the following criteria: a) Schools shall be located within or adjacent to the village center ; b) A credit toward any applicable school impacts fees shall be provided based upon an independent evaluation/appraisal of the value of the land and/or improvements provided by the developer; and c) Schools shall be located in order to minimize busing of students and to co-locate schools with public facilities and civic structures such as parks, libraries, community centers, public squares, greens and civic areas. vii. Within the NBM Overlay, elementary schools shall be accessed by local streets , pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and shall be allowed in and adjacent to the rural village center , provided such local streets provide adequate access as needed by the School Board. (b) Acreage Limitations. i. Rural villages shall be a minimum of 300 acres and a maximum of 1,500 acres, exclusive of the required green belt, with exception that the maximum size of a rural village within those RFMU receiving lands south of the Belle Meade NRPA shall not exceed 2,500 acres. ii. Neighborhood center - 0.5% of the total rural village acreage, not to exceed 10 acres, within each neighborhood center . iii. Neighborhood center Commercial - Not to exceed 40% of the neighborhood center acreage and 8,500 square feet of gross leasable floor area per acre. iv. Village center - Not to exceed 10% of the total rural village acreage. v. Village center commercial - Not to exceed 30% of the village center acreage and 10,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area per acre. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) vi. Research and Technology Parks limited to a minimum size of 19 acres and a maximum size of 4% of the total rural village acreage. vii. Civic Uses and Public Parks - Minimum of 10% of the total rural village acreage. (3) Density . A rural village shall have a minimum density of 2.0 units per gross acre and a maximum density of 3.0 units per gross acre, except that the minimum density within a NBMO rural village shall be 1.5 units per gross acre. Those densities shall be achieved as follows: (a) Base density . A base density of 0.2 dwelling units per acre (1.0 dwelling units per five acres) for lands within the rural village , and the land area designated as a greenbelt surrounding the rural village , is granted by right for allocation within the designated rural village . (b) Minimum density . The minimum gross density in a rural village is 2.0 units per acre outside of the NBMO and 1.5 units per acre within the NBMO. i. For each TDR credit used to achieve the minimum required density in a rural village , one Rural Village Bonus Credit shall be granted. Rural Village Bonus Credits may only be utilized in rural villages and shall not be available for use once the minimum required density is achieved. ii. The minimum density shall be achieved through any combination of TDR Credits , Rural Village Bonus Credits , and TDR Bonus Credits . (c) Maximum density . The maximum gross density allowed in a rural village is 3.0 units per acre. The maximum density shall be achieved through any of the following, either in combination or individually: i. TDR credits ; ii. TDR Bonus Credits ; iii. An additional density bonus 0.3 units per acre for the additional preservation of native vegetation as set forth in Chapter 4; iv. An additional density bonus of 0.3 units per acre for additional wetlands mitigation as set forth in Chapter 4; and/or v. An additional density bonus of 0.5 units per acre for each Affordable or workforce housing unit. (4) Other Design Standards (a) Transportation System Design. i. The rural village shall be designed with a formal street layout, using primarily a grid design and incorporating village greens, squares and civic uses as focal points. ii. Each rural village shall be served by a primary road system that is accessible by the public. Neighborhood Circulator, Local Residential Access and Residential Loop roads may be gated. The primary roads within the rural village shall consist of Rural Major Collectors at a minimum and be designed to meet County standards and shall be dedicated to the public. iii. A rural village shall not be split by an arterial roadway. iv. Interconnection between the rural village and adjacent development s shall be required. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) v. Neighborhoods, neighborhood centers , and the village center shall be connected through local and collector streets and shall incorporate traffic calming techniques as may be appropriate to discourage high-speed traffic. vi. Public transit and school bus stops shall be co-located, where practicable. vii. Pedestrian paths and bikeways shall be designed so as to provide access and interconnectivity. (b) Location Restrictions and Standards. i. In locating both schools and housing units within the rural village , consideration shall be given to minimizing busing needs within the community. ii. A rural village shall not be located any closer than 3.0 miles from another rural village . iii. No more than one rural village may be located in each of the distinct RFMU district Receiving Areas depicted on the FLUM and on the Official Collier County Zoning Atlas maps. iv. A rural village shall have direct access to a roadway classified by Collier County as an arterial or collector roadway. Alternatively, access to the rural village may be via a new collector roadway directly accessing an existing arterial, the cost of which shall be borne entirely by the developer. v. A rural village shall be located where other public infrastructure, such as potable water and sewer facilities, already exist or are planned. (c) Size Limitations. rural villages shall be a minimum of 300 acres and a maximum of 1,500 acres, except within RFMU receiving lands south of the Belle Meade NRPA where the maximum size may not exceed 2,500 acres. This required rural village size is exclusive of the required greenbelt area set forth in section 2.03.08 (A)(2)(b)(6). (d) Additional Village Design Criteria: Rural villages shall be designed in accordance with the following provisions: i. Rural villages shall be developed in a progressive urban to rural continuum with the greatest density , intensity and diversity occurring within the village center , to the least density , intensity and diversity occurring within the edge of the neighborhoods approaching the greenbelt . ii. Rural villages may include "special districts" in addition to the village center , neighborhood center and Neighborhoods, to accommodate uses that may require use specific design standards not otherwise provided for herein. Such Special Districts, their proposed uses, and applicable design standards shall be identified as part of the rural village PUD rezone process. iii. The rural village PUD Master Plan shall designate the location of the village center and each neighborhood, neighborhood center and as may be applicable, Special Districts. Rural villages shall include a village center and a minimum of two distinct neighborhoods, with defined neighborhood centers . iv. A mixture of allowable uses is encouraged to occur within buildings in the village center and neighborhood centers . v. Transient lodging is permitted at up to 26 guest units per acre calculated on the acreage of the parcel occupied by the transient lodging and its ancillary facilities, if such parcel includes multiple uses. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) vi. Building heights may vary within the village center and neighborhood centers , but shall not exceed 5 stories not exceeding 65 feet with the village center , or 4 stories no exceeding 55 feet within the neighborhood center , and 3 stories not to exceed 40 feet within 200 feet of the greenbelt . The height exclusions set forth in section 4.02.01 of this Code apply within a rural village . The height exclusion set forth in section 4.02.01 applies in the village center only, except that: a) section 4.02.01 requiring 300 square feet of green spaces for each parking space for which the height waiver is granted shall not apply; however, b) For each parking space for which the height waiver is granted, an equal amount of square footage of open space shall be provided in excess of the minimum set forth in section 2.03.08(A)(2)(b)(7). vii. The minimum lot area shall be 1,000 SF; however, within neighborhoods, especially approaching the edge of the Village and the surrounding green belt, less compact larger lot residential development may occur. viii. Within the village center and neighborhood centers , individual block perimeters shall not exceed 2,500 linear feet. ix. Within the village center and neighborhood centers required yards shall be as follows: a) Front setbacks - 0 to 10 feet from the right-of-way line b) Side setbacks - 0 feet c) Rear setbacks - 0 feet x. Within neighborhoods outside of a Neighborhood or village center required yards may vary but shall be designed so as to provide for adequate light, opens space ad movement of air, and shall consider the design objective of the urban to rural continuum with the greatest density , intensity and diversity occurring within the village center , to the least density , intensity and diversity occurring within the edge of the neighborhoods approaching the greenbelt . xi. Within the village center and neighborhood centers overhead encroachments such as awnings, balconies, arcades and the like, must maintain a clear distance of 9 feet above the sidewalk and 15 feet above the street . xii. Seating for outdoor dining shall be permitted to encroach the public sidewalks and shall leave a minimum 6-foot clear pedestrian way between the outdoor dining and the streetscape planting area. xiii. Civic or Institutional Buildings shall be subject to the specific standards of this subsection that regulate building height, building placement, building use, parking, and signage except as deviations are deemed appropriate by the Collier County planning staff with respect to the creation of focal points, vistas, and significant community landmarks. Specific design standards shall be provided in the rural village PUD document. xiv. Architectural Standards: Buildings within the village center shall be made compatible through similar massing, volume, frontage , scale and architectural features. The PUD document shall adhere to the provisions of section 5.05.08 of this Code; however, deviations may be requested where such deviations are shown to further these rural village design standards. xv. Required vehicular parking and loading amounts and design criteria: 3.C.f Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) a) The amount of required parking shall be demonstrated through a shared parking analysis submitted application as part of the rural village PUD. Parking shall be determined utilizing the modal splits and parking demands for various uses recognized by the ITE, ULI or other sources or studies. The analysis shall demonstrate the number of parking spaces available to more than one use or function, recognizing the required parking will vary depending on the multiple functions or uses in close proximity which are unlikely to require the spaces at the same time. b) On-site parking areas shall be organized into a series of small bays delineated by landscape islands of varied sized. A maximum spacing between landscape islands shall be 10 spaces. Landscape islands and tree diamonds shall have a minimum of one canopy tree. c) Parking lots shall be accessed from alleys , service lanes or secondary streets . d) Any or all of the above parking requirements may be further reduced if a shared parking plan is submitted as part of a rural village PUD or subsequent site development plan application. The shared parking plan shall demonstrate that the reduced parking is warranted as a result of the following: shared building and/or block use(s) where parking demands for certain uses are low when other demands are higher; a concentration of residential dwelling units located within 600 feet of non-residential uses; the existence of transit for use by residents and visitors. xvi. Landscaping minimums within the village center or within neighborhood centers shall be met by: a) Providing landscaping within parking lots as described, and by providing a streetscape area between the sidewalk and curb at a minimum of 5 Ft. in width; b) Planting street trees every 40 Ft. O.C. The street tree pattern may be interrupted by architectural elements such as arcades and columns. c) Plantings areas, raised planters, or planter boxes in the front of and adjacent to the buildings, where such planting areas do not interfere with pedestrian access and mobility. d) Providing for additional pubic use landscape areas at intervals within the streetscape, on identified parcels with block s, or as part of public greens, squares, parks or civic uses. xvii. Signs : The PUD document shall adhere to the provisions of section 5.06.00 of this Code; however, deviations may be requested where such deviations are shown to further these rural village design standards by providing for pedestrian scale signage standards with neighborhood centers or the village center . (5) Native vegetation . Native vegetation shall be preserved as set forth in section 4.06.04. (6) Greenbelt . Except within the NBMO rural village , a greenbelt averaging a minimum of 300 feet in width, but not less than 200 feet in width at any location, shall be required at the perimeter of the rural village . The greenbelt is required to ensure a permanently undeveloped edge surrounding the rural village , thereby discouraging sprawl. Greenbelts shall conform to the following: (a) Greenbelts may only be designated on RFMU receiving lands . 3.C.f Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) (b) The allowable residential density shall be shifted from the designated greenbelt to the rural village . (c) The greenbelt may be concentrated to a greater degree in areas where it is necessary to protect listed species habitat, including wetlands and uplands, provide for a buffer from adjacent natural reservations , or provide for wellfield or aquifer protection. However, at no location shall the greenbelt be less than 300 feet in width. (d) Golf courses and existing agriculture operations are permitted within the greenbelt , subject to the vegetation retention standards set forth in section 4.06.04. However, golf course turf areas shall only be located within 100 feet of the greenbelt boundaries (interior and exterior boundary); further, these turf areas shall only be located in previously cleared or disturbed areas. (7) Open space : Within the rural village , a minimum of 40% of open space shall be provided, inclusive of the greenbelt . (8) Process for Approval of a rural village . Applications for approval shall be submitted in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezone utilizing the standard form(s) developed by Collier County, and subject to the Fees established for a PUD rezone application. Where applicable, the rural village PUD application will be submitted in conjunction with a development of Regional Impact (DRI) application as provided for in Chapter 380 of Florida Statutes, or in conjunction with any other Florida provisions of law that may supercede the DRI process. The applicant shall notify the owner(s) of subsurface mineral rights to the property within the boundaries of the proposed rural village prior to approval of the PUD. The Application for rural village PUD approval shall demonstrate general compliance with the provisions of section 2.03.06 and shall include the following additional submittal requirements: (a) EIS. An environmental impact statement for the rural village and surrounding greenbelt area shall be submitted an accordance with the requirements of Chapter 10 of this Code. (b) Demonstration of Fiscal Neutrality. An analysis that demonstrates that the rural village will be fiscally neutral to county taxpayers outside of the rural village . This analysis shall evaluate the demand and impacts on levels of service for public facilities and the cost of such facilities and services necessary to serve the rural village . In addition, this evaluation shall identify projected revenue sources for services and any capital improvements that may be necessary to support the rural village . In conclusion, this analysis shall indicate what provisions and/or commitments will be to ensure that the provision of necessary facilities and services will be fiscally neutral to County taxpayers outside of the rural village . At a minimum, the analysis shall consider the following: i. Stormwater/ drainage facilities ; ii. Potable water provisions and facilities; iii. Reuse or "Grey" water provisions for irrigation; iv. Central sewer provisions and facilities; v. Law enforcement facilities; vi. School facilities; vii. Roads, transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities and pathways ; a) Solid waste facilities. b) Development phasing and funding mechanisms to address any impacts to level of service in accordance with the county's adopted 3.C.f Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) concurrency management program to ensure that there will be no degradation to the adopted level of service for public facilities and infrastructure identified in (1) through (7) above. 3. Neutral lands. Neutral lands have been identified for limited semi-rural residential development . Available data indicates that neutral lands have a higher ratio of native vegetation , and thus higher habitat values, than lands designated as RFMU receiving lands , but these values do not approach those of RFMU sending lands . Therefore, these lands are appropriate for limited development , if such development is directed away from existing native vegetation and habitat. Within neutral lands , the following standards shall apply: a. Allowable uses. The following uses are permitted as of right: (1) Uses Permitted as of Right. (a) Agricultural activities, including, but not limited to: Crop raising, horticulture, fruit and nut production, forestry, groves, nurseries, ranching, beekeeping, poultry and egg production, milk production, livestock raising, and aquaculture for native species subject to the State of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Owning, maintaining or operating any facility or part thereof for the following purposes is prohibited: i. Fighting or baiting any animal by the owner of such facility or any other person or entity. ii. Raising any animal or animals intended to be ultimately used or used for fighting or baiting purposes. iii. For purposes of this subsection, the term baiting is defined as set forth in § 828.122(2)(a), F.S., as it may be amended from time to time. (b) Single-family residential dwelling units , including mobile homes where a mobile home Zoning Overlay exists. (c) Dormitories, duplexes and other types of staff housing, as may be incidental to, and in support of, conservation uses . (d) Group housing uses subject to the following density /intensity limitations: (e) Family Care Facilities: 1 unit per 5 acres; (f) Group Care Facilities and other Care Housing Facilities: Maximum floor area ratio (FAR) not to exceed 0.45. (g) Staff housing as may be incidental to, and in support of, safety service facilities and essential services . (h) Farm labor housing limited to 10 acres in any single location: i. Single family/ duplex / mobile home : 11 dwelling units per acre; ii. Multifamily/dormitory: 22 dwelling units /beds per acre. (i) Sporting and Recreational camps, not to exceed 1 cabin/lodging unit per 5 gross acres. (j) Those essential services identified in section 2.01.03 (A). (k) Golf courses or driving ranges, subject to the following standards: i. Golf courses shall be designed, constructed, and managed in accordance with the best management practices of Audubon International's Gold Signature Program. The project shall demonstrate that the Principles for Resource Management required by the Gold Signature Program (Site Specific Assessment, Habitat Sensitivity, Native and Naturalized Plants and 3.C.f Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Natural Landscaping, Water Conservation, Waste Management, Energy Conservation & Renewable Energy Sources, Transportation, Greenspace and Corridors, Agriculture, and Building Design) have been incorporated into the golf course's design and operational procedures. ii. In order to prevent the contamination of soil, surface water and ground water by the materials stored and handled by golf course maintenance operations, golf courses shall comply with the Best Management Practices for Golf Course Maintenance Departments, prepared by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, May 1995. iii. To protect ground and surface water quality from fertilizer and pesticide usage, golf courses shall demonstrate the following management practices: a) The use of slow release nitrogen sources; b) The use of soil and plant tissue analysis to adjust timing and amount of fertilization applications; c) The use of an integrated pest management program using both biological and chemical agents to control various pests; d) The coordination of pesticide applications with the timing and application of irrigation water; e) The use of the procedure contained in IFAS Circular 1011, Managing Pesticides for Golf Course Maintenance and Water Quality Protection, May 1991 (revised 1995) to select pesticides that will have a minimum adverse impact on water quality. iv. To ensure water conservation, golf courses shall incorporate the following in their design and operation: a) Irrigation systems shall be designed to use weather station information and moisture-sensing systems to determine the optimum amount of irrigation water needed considering soil moisture and evapotranspiration rates. b) As available, golf courses shall utilize treated effluent reuse water consistent with Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element Objective 1.4 and its policies. c) Native plants shall be used exclusively except for special purpose areas such as golf greens, fairways, and building sites. Within these excepted areas, landscaping plans shall require that at least 75% of the trees and 50% of the shrubs be freeze-tolerant native Floridian species. At least 75% of the required native trees and shrubs shall also be drought tolerant species. v. Stormwater management ponds shall be designed to mimic the functions of natural systems: by establishing shorelines that are sinuous in configuration in order to provide increased length and diversity of the littoral zone. A Littoral shelf shall be established to provide a feeding area for water dependent avian species. The combined length of vertical and rip-rapped walls shall be limited to 25% of the shoreline . Credits to the site preservation area requirements, on an acre- to- acre basis, shall be given for littoral shelves that exceed these littoral shelf area requirements. vi. Site preservation and native vegetation retention requirements shall be the same as those set forth in the RFMU district criteria. Site preservation areas are intended to provide habitat functions and shall meet minimum 3.C.f Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) dimensions as set forth in the LDC. These standards shall be established within one year. (l) Public educational plants and ancillary plants. (m) Oil and gas exploration , subject to applicable state and federal drilling permits and Collier County non-environmental site development plan review procedures. Directional-drilling and/or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized in order to minimize impacts to native habitats, where determined to be practicable. This requirement shall be deemed satisfied upon issuance of a state permit in compliance with the criteria established in Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on Oct. 3, 2005 [ effective date of this provision ] regardless of whether the activity occurs within the Big Cypress Watershed, as defined in Rule 62C-30.001(2), F.A.C. All applicable Collier County environmental permitting requirements shall be considered satisfied by evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County, so long as the state permits comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C. For those areas of Collier County outside the boundary of the Big Cypress Watershed, the applicant shall be responsible for convening the Big Cypress Swamp Advisory Committee as set forth in Section 377.42, F.S., to assure compliance with Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., even if outside the defined Big Cypress Watershed. All oil and gas access roads shall be constructed and protected from unauthorized uses according to the standards established in Rule 62C-30.005(2)(a)(1) through (12), F.A.C. n. Park, open space, and recreational uses. o. Private schools. (2) Accessory uses . The following uses are permitted as accessory to uses permitted as of right or to approved conditional uses : (a) Accessory uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right in section 2.03.08(A)(3)(a)(1) above. (b) Recreational facilities that serve as an integral part of a residential development and have been designated, reviewed, and approved on a site development plan or preliminary subdivision plat for that development. Recreational facilities may include, but are not limited to clubhouse, community center building , tennis facilities, playgrounds and playfields. (3) Conditional uses . The following uses are permissible as conditional uses subject to the standards and procedures established in section 10.08.00. (a) Zoo, aquarium, botanical garden, or other similar uses. (b) Community facilities, such as, places of worship, childcare facilities, cemeteries, social and fraternal organizations. (c) Sports instructional schools and camps. (d) Multi-family residential structures, subject to the following development standards: (i) Building height limitation: 2 stories (ii) Buffer: 10 foot wide landscape buffer with trees spaced no more than 30 feet on center; (iii) Setbacks: 50% of the height of the building, but not less than 15 feet. (e) Those essential services identified in sections 2.01.03 (G)(1) and (G)(3). 3.C.f Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) (f) Oil and gas field development and production, subject to applicable state and federal field development permits and Collier County non-environmental site development plan review procedures. Directional-drilling and/or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized in order to minimize impacts to native habitats, where determined to be practicable. This requirement shall be deemed satisfied upon issuance of a state permit in compliance with the criteria established in Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 14, 2005, regardless of whether the activity occurs within the Big Cypress Watershed, as defined in Rule 62C-30.001(2), F.A.C. All applicable Collier County environmental permitting requirements shall be considered satisfied by evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County, so long as the state permits comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C. For those areas of Collier County outside the boundary of the Big Cypress Watershed, the applicant shall be responsible for convening the Big Cypress Swamp Advisory Committee as set forth in Section 377.42, F.S., to assure compliance with Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., even if outside the defined Big Cypress Watershed. All oil and gas access roads shall be constructed and protected from unauthorized uses according to the standards established in Rule 62C-30.005(2)(a)(1) through (12), F.A.C. (g) Earth mining and extraction and related processing. (h) Facilities for the collection, transfer, processing, and reduction of solid waste. (i) Those essential services identified in sections 2.01.03 (G)(1) and (G)(3). (j) Oil and gas field development and production, subject to state field development permits and Collier County non-environmental site development plan review procedures. Directional-drilling and/or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized in order to minimize impacts to native habitats, where determined to be practicable. This requirement shall be deemed satisfied upon issuance of a state permit in compliance with the criteria established in Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., regardless of whether the activity occurs within the Big Cypress Watershed, as defined in Rule 62C-30.001(2), F.A.C. All applicable Collier County environmental permitting requirements shall be considered satisfied by evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County, so long as the state permits comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C. For those areas of Collier County outside the boundary of the Big Cypress Watershed, the applicant shall be responsible for convening the Big Cypress Swamp Advisory Committee as set forth in Section 377.42, F.S., to assure compliance with Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., even if outside the defined Big Cypress Watershed. All oil and gas access roads shall be constructed and protected from unauthorized uses according to the standards established in Rule 62-30.005(2)(a)(1) through (12), F.A.C. (k) Earth mining and extraction and related processing. b. Density. (1) Maximum gross density . The maximum gross density in neutral lands shall not exceed one dwelling unit per five gross acres (0.2 dwelling units per acre), except that the maximum gross density for those legal nonconforming lots or parcels in existence as of June 22, 1999, shall be one dwelling unit per lot or parcel . (2) Residential clustering . Clustering of residential development is allowed and encouraged. Where clustered development is employed, it shall be in accordance with the following provisions: 3.C.f Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) (a) If within the boundaries of the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District, as delineated on the Urban-Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay Map in the Future Land Use Element of the GMP, and consistent with the provisions of the Potable Water and Sanitary Sewer Sub-elements of this Plan, central water and sewer shall be extended to the project. Where County sewer or water services may not be available concurrent with development in neutral lands, interim private water and sewer facilities may be approved. (b) The clustered development shall be located on the site so as to provide to the greatest degree practicable: i. protection for listed species habitat; ii. preservation of the highest quality native vegetation iii. connectivity to adjacent natural reservations or preservation areas on adjacent development; ..... b§ and iv. creation, maintenance or enhancement of wildlife corridors. (c) The minimum project size shall be at least 40 acres. c. Dimensional and design standards. Dimensional and Design Standards set forth in section 4.02.01 of this Code shall apply to all development in neutral lands , except for development utilizing the residential clustering provisions in section 2.03.08 (A)(3)(b)(2) above. In the case of such clustered development , the following dimensional standards shall apply to all permitted housing structure types, accessory, and conditional uses : (1) Development that is Not Clustered: (a) Minimum lot area: 5 Acres. (b) Minimum lot width: 165 Feet. (c) Minimum yard Requirements: i. Front yard : 50 feet. ii. Side yard : 30 feet. iii. Rear yard : 50 feet. iv. Nonconforming lots in existence as of June 22, 1999: a) Front yard : 40 feet. b) Side yard : 10 percent of lot width, not to exceed 20 feet on each side. c) Rear yard : 50 feet. (2) Development that is Clustered. (a) Minimum lot area: 4,500 square feet. (b) Maximum lot area: One Acre. (c) Minimum lot width: Interior lots 40 feet. (d) Maximum lot width: 150 feet. (3) Height Limitations. (a) Principal: 35 feet. (b) Accessory: 20 feet, except for screen enclosures, which may be the same height as the principal structure . (c) Golf course/community clubhouses: 50 feet. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) (4) Floor area . The minimum floor area for each dwelling unit shall be 800 square feet. (5) Parking. As required in Chapter 4. (6) Landscaping. As required in Chapter 4. (7) Signs : As required in section 5.06.00. d. Native vegetation retention. Native vegetation shall be preserved as set forth in Chapter 4. e. Usable open space . (1) Projects of 40 acres or more in size shall provide a minimum of 70% usable open space . (2) Usable open space includes active or passive recreation areas such as parks, playgrounds, golf courses, waterways, lakes, nature trails, and other similar open spaces . Usable open space shall also include areas set aside for conservation or preservation of native vegetation and landscape areas. (3) Open water beyond the perimeter of the site, street right-of-way , except where dedicated or donated for public uses, driveways , off- street parking and loading areas, shall not be counted towards required usable open space . 4. RFMU sending lands. RFMU sending lands are those lands that have the highest degree of environmental value and sensitivity and generally include significant wetlands , uplands, and habitat for listed species. RFMU sending lands are the principal target for preservation and conservation. Density may be transferred from RFMU sending lands as provided in LDC section 2.03.07 D.4.c. All NRPAs within the RFMU district are also RFMU sending lands . With the exception of specific provisions applicable only to NBMO neutral lands , the following standards shall apply within all RFMU sending lands : a. Allowable uses where TDR credits have not been severed. (1) Uses Permitted as of Right: (a) Agricultural uses consistent with Sections 163.3162 and 823.14(6) Florida Statutes (Florida Right to Farm Act). (b) Detached single-family dwelling units , including mobile homes where the mobile home Zoning Overlay exists, (c) Habitat preservation and conservation uses . (d) Passive parks and other passive recreational uses. (e) Sporting and Recreational camps, within which the lodging component shall not exceed 1 unit per 5 gross acres. (f) Those essential services identified in section 2.01.03(B). (g) Oil and gas exploration , subject to applicable state and federal drilling permits and Collier County non-environmental site development plan review procedures. Directional-drilling and/or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized in order to minimize impacts to native habitats, where determined to be practicable. This requirement shall be deemed satisfied upon issuance of a state permit in compliance with the criteria established in Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as such rules existed on Oct. 3, 2005 [ the effective date of this provision ], regardless of whether the activity occurs within the Big Cypress Watershed, as defined in Rule 62C-30.001(2), F.A.C. All applicable Collier County environmental permitting requirements shall be considered satisfied by evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County, so long as the state permits 3.C.f Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C. For those areas of Collier County outside the boundary of the Big Cypress Watershed, the applicant shall be responsible for convening the Big Cypress Swamp Advisory Committee as set forth in Section 377.42, F.S., to assure compliance with Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., even if outside the defined Big Cypress Watershed. All oil and gas access roads shall be constructed and protected from unauthorized uses according to the standards established in Rule 62C-30.005(2)(a)(1) through (12), F.A.C. (2) Accessory uses . Accessory uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right in LDC section 2.03.08 A.4.a.1 above. (3) Conditional uses . (a) Those essential services identified in LDC section 2.01.03 G.2 and 4. (b) Public facilities, including solid waste and resource recovery facilities, and public vehicle and equipment storage and repair facilities, shall be permitted within Section 25, Township 49S, Range 26E, on lands adjacent to the existing County landfill. This shall not be interpreted to allow for the expansion of the landfill into Section 25 for the purpose of solid waste disposal. (c) Oil and gas field development and production, subject to applicable state and federal field development permits and Collier County non-environmental site development plan review procedures. Directional-drilling and/or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized in order to minimize impacts to native habitats, where determined to be practicable. This requirement shall be deemed satisfied upon issuance of a state permit in compliance with the criteria established in Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on Oct. 3, 2005 [ the effective date of this provision ], regardless of whether the activity occurs within the Big Cypress Watershed, as defined in Rule 62C- 30.001(2), F.A.C. All applicable Collier County environmental permitting requirements shall be considered satisfied by evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County, so long as the state permits comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C. For those areas of Collier County outside the boundary of the Big Cypress Watershed, the applicant shall be responsible for convening the Big Cypress Swamp Advisory Committee as set forth in Section 377.42, F.S., to assure compliance with Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., even if outside the defined Big Cypress Watershed. All oil and gas access roads shall be constructed and protected from unauthorized uses according to the standards established in Rule 62C- 30.005(2)(a)(1) through (12), F.A.C. (d) Commercial uses accessory to permitted uses 1.a, 1.c. and 1.d above, such as retail sales of produce accessory to farming, or a restaurant accessory to a park or preserve, so long as restrictions or limitations are imposed to insure the commercial use functions as an accessory, subordinate use. b. Uses allowed where TDR credits have been severed. (1) Uses Permitted as of Right: (a) Agricultural uses consistent with Sections 163.3162 and 823.14(6) Florida Statutes (Florida Right to Farm Act), including water management facilities, to the extent and intensity that such operations exist at the date of any transfer of development rights. (b) Cattle grazing on unimproved pasture where no clearing is required; 3.C.f Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) (c) Detached single-family dwelling units , including mobile homes where the mobile home Zoning Overlay exists, at a maximum density of one dwelling unit per 40 acres. In order to retain these development rights after any transfer, up to one dwelling must be retained (not transferred) per 40 acres. (d) One detached dwelling unit, including mobile homes where the mobile home zoning overlay exists, per lot or parcel in existence as of June 22, 1999, that is less than 40 acres. In order to retain these development rights after any transfer, up to one dwelling must be retained (not transferred) per each lot or parcel . For the purposes of this provision, a lot or parcel shall be deemed to have been in existence as of June 22, 1999, upon a showing of any of the following: i. the lot or parcel is part of a subdivision that was recorded in the public records of the County on or before June 22, 1999; ii. a description of the lot or parcel , by metes and bounds or other specific legal description, was recorded in the public records of the County on or before June 22, 1999; or iii. an agreement for deed for the lot or parcel , which includes description of the lot or parcel by limited fixed boundary, was executed on or before June 22, 1999. (e) Habitat preservation and conservation uses . (f) Passive parks and passive recreational uses. (g) Those essential services identified in section 2.01.03 B. (h) Oil and gas exploration , subject to applicable state and federal drilling permits and Collier County non-environmental site development plan review procedures. Directional-drilling and/or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized in order to minimize impacts to native habitats, where determined to be practicable. This requirement shall be deemed satisfied upon issuance of a state permit in compliance with the criteria established in Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on Oct. 3, 2005 [ the effective date of this provision ], regardless of whether the activity occurs within the Big Cypress Watershed, as defined in Rule 62C-30.001(2), F.A.C. All applicable Collier County environmental permitting requirements shall be considered satisfied by evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County, so long as the state permits comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C. For those areas of Collier County outside the boundary of the Big Cypress Watershed, the applicant shall be responsible for convening the Big Cypress Swamp Advisory Committee as set forth in Section 377.42, F.S., to assure compliance with Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., even if outside the defined Big Cypress Watershed. All oil and gas access roads shall be constructed and protected from unauthorized uses according to the standards established in Rule 62C-30.005(2)(a)(1) through (12), F.A.C. (i) Mitigation in conjunction with any County, state, or federal permitting. (2) Conditional uses: (a) Those essential uses identified in LDC section 2.01.03 G.2 and 4. (b) Oil and gas field development and production, subject to applicable state and federal field development permits and Collier County non-environmental site development plan review procedures. Directional-drilling and/or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized in order to minimize impacts to native habitats, where determined to be practicable. This requirement shall be deemed 3.C.f Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) satisfied upon issuance of a state permit in compliance with the criteria established in Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on Oct. 3, 2005 [ the effective date of this provision ], regardless of whether the activity occurs within the Big Cypress Watershed, as defined in Rule 62C- 30.001(2), F.A.C. All applicable Collier County environmental permitting requirements shall be considered satisfied by evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County, so long as the state permits comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C. For those areas of Collier County outside the boundary of the Big Cypress Watershed, the applicant shall be responsible for convening the Big Cypress Swamp Advisory Committee as set forth in Section 377.42, F.S., to assure compliance with Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., even if outside the defined Big Cypress Watershed. All oil and gas access roads shall be constructed and protected from unauthorized uses according to the standards established in Rule 62C- 30.005(2)(a)(1) through (12), F.A.C. (c) Conditional use approval criteria: In addition to the criteria set forth in section 10.08.00 of this Code, the following additional criteria shall apply to the approval of conditional uses within RFMU sending lands : i. The applicant shall submit a plan for development that demonstrates that wetlands , listed species and their habitat are adequately protected as specified in Chapters 3, 4 and 10. ii. Conditions may be imposed, as deemed appropriate, to limit the size, location, and access to the conditional use. c. Density . (1) 1.0 dwelling units per 40 gross acres; or (2) 1.0 dwelling unit per nonconforming lot or parcel in existence as of June 22, 1999. For the purpose of this provision, a lot or parcel which is deemed to have been in existence on or before June 22, 1999 is: (a) A lot or parcel which is part of a subdivision recorded in the public records of Collier County, Florida; (b) A lot or parcel which has limited fixed boundaries, described by metes and bounds or other specific legal description, the description of which has been recorded in the public records of Collier County Florida on or before June 22, 1999; or (c) A lot or parcel which has limited fixed boundaries and for which an agreement for deed was executed prior to June 22, 1999. d. Native vegetation retention. As required in Chapter 4. e. Other dimensional design standards. Dimensional standards set forth in section 4.02.01 of this Code shall apply to all development in Sending designated lands of the RFMU district , except as follows: (1) Lot Area and Width. (a) Minimum lot Area: 40 acres. (b) Minimum lot Width: 300 Feet. (2) Parking. As required in Chapter 4. (3) Landscaping. As required in Chapter 4. (4) Signs . As required in section 5.06.00. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 5. Specific vegetation standards for the RFMU district . For these specific standards, please refer to section 3.05.07 C. through 3.05.07 E. of this Code. B. Natural resource protection area overlay district (NRPA). 1. Purpose and intent. The purpose and intent of the Natural Resource Protection Area Overlay District (NRPA) is to: protect endangered or potentially endangered species by directing incompatible land uses away from their habitats; to identify large, connected, intact, and relatively unfragmented habitats, which may be important for these listed species; and to support State and Federal agencies' efforts to protect endangered or potentially endangered species and their habitats. NRPAs may include major wetland systems and regional flow-ways. These lands generally should be the focus of any federal, state, County, or private acquisition efforts. Accordingly, allowable land uses, vegetation preservation standards, development standards, and listed species protection criteria within NRPAs set forth herein are more restrictive than would otherwise be permitted in the underlying zoning district and shall to be applicable in addition to any standards that apply tin the underlying zoning district. a. NRPA overlay areas. NRPAs are located in the following areas: (1) Clam Bay Conservation Area (within Pelican Bay Planned Unit development ); (2) CREW (Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed); (3) North Belle Meade; (4) South Belle Meade; (5) South Golden Gate Estates. The NRPA lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District to which the Section 2.03.08 C. regulations apply (i.e. - numbers 3 and 4 above) are depicted by the 3.C.f Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) b. NRPAS designated as RFMU sending lands within the RFMU district . NRPAs located in the RFMU district are identified as RFMU sending lands and are further subject to the provisions, conditions and standards set forth in section 2.03.08 (A)(4). Private property owners within these NRPAs may transfer residential development rights from these important environmentally sensitive lands to other identified "receiving" lands pursuant to eth specific provisions set forth in section 2.01.03 of this Code. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) c. Development standards. Development within a NRPA shall adhere to the following standards: (1) Vegetation Retention and Site Preservation - Native vegetation retention shall be as required in Chapter 4. (2) Permitted and conditional uses for all lands within a NRPA that are zoned CON and for those lands within any NRPA that are publicly owned shall be as set forth in sections 2.03.05 (B)(1)(a), (b) and (c), respectively. (3) For privately owned lands within a NRPA within the RFMU district , permitted and conditional uses shall be those as set forth in the RFMU district Sending Lands (section 2.03.08 A.4.). (4) For privately owned lands within a NRPA and designated Estates, permitted and conditional uses shall be those as set forth in the Estates Designation within the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. As these privately owned Estates Designated lands are acquired for conservation purposes, the Comprehensive Plan and will be amended to change the Designation to Conservation and the property will be rezoned to the CON district . (5) There are approximately 15 sections of privately owned land within a NRPA that are not designated Sending and are not located within the RFMU district . Eight (8) of these sections, known as the "hole-in-the-doughnut," are located within the South Golden Gate Estates NRPA and surrounded by platted Estates lots , almost all of which have been acquired by the State under the Florida Forever program as part of the Picayune Strand State Forest. The remaining seven (7) sections are within an approved mitigation bank located north and west of Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary. As these privately owned Agricultural/Rural Designated lands are acquired for conservation purposes, the Plan will be amended to change the Designation to CON district . Until such time as the designation on these lands is change to CON district , permitted and conditional uses for these privately owned lands shall be those set forth in underlying zoning district. C. North Belle Meade Overlay District (NBMO). 1. Purpose and intent. The North Belle Meade Overlay (NBMO) is unique to the RFMU district because it is surrounded by areas that are vested for development on three sides. Because this area is largely undeveloped and includes substantial vegetated areas, the NBMO can and does provide valuable habitat for wildlife, including endangered species. The NBMO is intended to achieve a balance of both preservation and opportunities for future development that takes into account resource protection and the relationship between this area and the Estates developing around the NBMO. 2. General location. The NBMO District is surrounded by Golden Gate Estates to the north, east, and west and I-75 to the south. This NBMO comprises some 24 sections of land (approximately 15,550 acres) located entirely within the RFMU District (LDC section 2.03.08 A.). The boundaries of the NBMO District are outlined in Illustration 2.03.08 C.2.a below and on the North Belle Meade Overlay Map in the Future Land Use Element of the GMP. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Illustration 2.03.08 C.2.a 3. Applicability: a. NBMO receiving lands. Permitted, conditional, and accessory uses within NBMO Receiving Lands shall be as set forth in LDC section 2.03.08 A.2, except as provided in LDC section 2.03.08 C.5.a. All other provisions of this Code that implement the Future 3.C.f Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Land Use Element, Conservation and Coastal Management Element, or Public Facilities Element, including but not limited to Chapters 3, 4 and 10, shall only be applicable to development in NBMO Receiving Lands to the extent specifically stated in this section. However, all development within NBMO Receiving Lands shall comply with all non- environmental review procedures for site development plans and platting as set forth in this Code. b. NBMO neutral lands . Except as otherwise specifically provided in LDC section 2.03.08 C.4. and LDC section 2.03.08 C.5.b., all development within NBMO neutral lands shall be consistent with LDC section 2.03.08 A.3. c. NBMO sending lands. Except as otherwise specifically provided in LDC section 2.03.08 C.4., all development with NBMO Sending Lands shall be consistent with LDC section 2.03.08 A.4. 4. General planning and design considerations: a. Transportation. As a condition for the approval of the residential component of any subdivision plat, site development plan, PUD, or DRI within Sections 21, 28, or 27 of the NBMO, the following transportation related improvements and planning and design elements shall be addressed and provision made for their completion. (1) An extension of Wilson Boulevard shall be provided, including ROW dedication and construction to County collector road standards, through Section 33, Range 27 East, extending to the south to Interstate 75 via an interchange or service road for residential development should it commence in Sections 21, 28 and 27. The portion of Wilson Boulevard that traverses through NBMO Sending Lands shall be designed with aquatic species crossings and small terrestrial animal crossings. (2) As an alternative to (1) above, a haul road along an extension of Wilson Boulevard shall be improved to standards sufficient, in the opinion of County transportation staff, to safely serve earth-mining activities with a connection through Sections 32 and 31 to Landfill Road. (3) Lands required for the extension of Wilson Boulevard will be dedicated to Collier County at the time of rezoning. The right-of-way shall be of a sufficient size to accommodate collector road requirements. (4) All new roads and road improvements, other than the Wilson Boulevard extension and the haul road referenced in 2 above, shall: (a) be routed so as to avoid traversing publicly owned natural preserves, publicly owned parks, publicly owned recreation areas, areas identified as environmentally sensitive wildlife habitat, wildlife corridors, and greenways unless there is no feasible and prudent alternative; and (b) be designed with aquatic species crossings, small terrestrial animal crossings, and large terrestrial animal crossings pursuant to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission criteria. b. Buffering . The western ¼ of Sections 22 and 27 shall be buffered from the NBMO NRPA to the east by a buffer preservation that includes all of the eastern ½ of the western ¼ of Sections 22 and 27. This buffer shall consist of lake excavation areas between the Wilson Boulevard extension road right-of-way and the NRPA. c. Greenway. A Greenway that follows natural flowways , as contemplated in the Community Character Plan prepared by Dover Kohl, shall be created within NBMO Sending Lands. As a condition to the creation of TDR credits from NBMO Sending Lands that constitute natural flowways , such lands shall be dedicated to a public or private entity for use as part of the Greenway. 5. Additional specific area provisions. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) a. Receiving lands. (1) Density . (a) The base density in RFMU receiving lands , outside of a rural village is one dwelling unit per five (5) gross acres. (b) This density may be increased, through TDR credits and TDR Bonus Credits , up to a maximum of 1 dwelling unit per gross acre. (c) Once a density of 1 dwelling unit per gross acre is achieved through TDR credits and TDR Bonus Credits , additional density may be achieved as follows: i. 0.1 dwelling unit per acre for each acre of native vegetation preserved on- site; ii. 0.1 dwelling unit per acre for each acre of wetlands having a functionality value, as assessed using the South Florida Water Management District's Unified Wetlands Mitigation Assessment Method, of 0.65 or greater that are preserved on-site; and/or iii. 0.1 dwelling unit per acre for each acre of NBMO Sending Land that is within either a NRPA or a buffer area adjoining a NRPA that is dedicated to a public or private entity for conservation use. (2) The earth mining operation and asphalt plant uses that currently exist within NBMO Receiving Lands may continue and may expand as follows: (a) Until June 19, 2005, or such other date as the GMP is amended to provide, such uses may expand only into the western half of Section 21 and shall not generate truck traffic beyond average historic levels. (b) Such mining operations and an asphalt plant may expand on Sections 21 and 28 and the western quarters of 22 and 27 as a permitted use if either of the following occurs by June 19, 2005, or such other date as the GMP is amended to provide: i. an alignment has been selected, funding has been determined, and an accelerated construction schedule established by the BCC and the mine operator, for an east-west connector roadway between County Road 951 and the Wilson Boulevard extension; or ii. the mine operator commits to construct a private haul road by June 19, 2007, or such other date as the GMP is amended to provide, without the use of any public funds. (c) If the conditions for expansion set forth in b above are not satisfied, any mining operations or asphalt plant in these areas, other than continued operations on the western half of Section 21 at historic levels, shall be permitted only as a conditional use. (3) A greenbelt is not required for any development in NBMO Receiving Lands, whether inside or outside of a rural village . However, any greenbelt that is provided in a NBMO rural village shall be included in the calculation of open space. (4) NBMO rural village. A NBMO rural village shall adhere to the provisions for rural village set forth in LDC section 2.03.08 A.2.b., except as follows: (a) Density. An NBMO rural village shall have a minimum gross density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre and a maximum gross density of three (3) dwelling units per acre. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) i. The minimum required density shall be achieved through TDR credits, TDR Bonus Credits, and Rural Village Bonus credits, as provided in LDC section 2.03.08 A.2.b.(3)(c). ii. Once the minimum required density is achieved, additional density may be achieved, up to the maximum of three (3) dwelling units per gross acre through any one or combination of the following: a) TDR credits ; b) TDR Bonus Credits; c) 0.3 dwelling unit per acre for each acre of native vegetation preserved on-site; d) 0.3 dwelling unit per acre for each acre of wetlands having a functionality value, as assessed using the South Florida Water Management District's Unified wetlands Mitigation Assessment Method, of 0.65 or greater that are preserved on-site; and/or e) 0.3 dwelling unit per acre for each acre of NBMO Sending Land that is within either a NRPA or a buffer area adjoining a NRPA that is dedicated to a public or private entity for conservation use. (b) Sidewalks shall be required on both sides of the streets . (c) Interconnected bike lanes shall be provided on all collector and arterial roadways. (d) Schools shall be located within a NBMO rural village whenever possible, in order to minimize bussing of students. Furthermore, whenever possible, schools shall be co-located with other public facilities and civic structures , such as parks, libraries, community centers, public squares, greens, and civic areas. (e) Elementary schools shall be accessible by local streets and pedestrian and bicycle facilities and shall be located in or adjacent to the rural village center , provided that local streets provide access adequate to meets the needs of the School Board. b. Neutral lands. Neutral lands shall be governed by the standards set forth in LDC section 2.03.08 A.3. In addition to standards in LDC section 2.03.08 A.3., neutral lands located in Section 24, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, shall be governed by the North Belle Meade Overlay in the Future Land Use Element of the GMP. Where there is a conflict between provisions, the GMP overlay provisions shall apply. (Ord. No. 04-72, § 3.F; Ord. No. 05-27, § 3.E; Ord. No. 05-49, § 3.B; Ord. No. 07-67, § 3.E; Ord. No. 08-08, § 3.C; Ord. No. 12-38, § 3.C; Ord. No. 16-27, § 3.G; Ord. No. 18-18, § 3.E; Ord. No. 19-08, § 3.B) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 2.03.07 - Overlay Zoning Districts D. Special Treatment Overlay (ST). 1. Within the County there are certain areas, which because of their unique assemblages of flora and/or fauna, their aesthetic appeal, historical or archaeological significance, rarity in the County, or their contribution to their own and adjacent ecosystems, make them worthy of special regulations. Such regulations are directed toward the conservation, protection, and preservation of ecological and recreational values for the greatest benefit to the people of the County. Such areas include, but are not necessarily limited to, mangrove and freshwater swamps, barrier islands, hardwood hammocks, xeric scrubs, coastal beaches , estuaries, cypress domes, natural drainage ways, aquifer recharge areas, and lands and structures of historical and archaeological significance. The purpose of the "ST" district is to assure the preservation and maintenance of these environmental and cultural resources and to encourage the preservation of the intricate ecological relationships within the systems, and at the same time, permit those types of development which will hold changes to levels determined acceptable by the BCC after public hearing. 2. An overlay zoning district classification to be known as the ST special treatment overlay district, and to be designated on the Official Zoning Atlas by the symbol "ST" together with the symbol of the basic zoning district which it overlays, is hereby established. This overlay district classification will be used for those lands of environmental sensitivity and historical and archaeological significance where the essential ecological or cultural value of the land is not adequately protected under the basic zoning district regulations established by this LDC. The placement or removal of this the ST district shall be governed by the procedure for amending the LDC and this Official Zoning Atlas as prescribed in Chapter 10. All land within the ST overlay district shall be designated as environmentally sensitive. 3. For purposes of identifying land from which the residential development rights have been transferred, such lands shall be designated on the Official Zoning Atlas by affixing the letter "P" for preservation to the symbol "ST," thusly "P-ST." Such designation shall be placed on the land after the BCC has accepted the deed and/or guarantee to said property. 4. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR). a. Purpose, Intent and Applicability. i. Purpose. The primary purpose of the TDR process is to establish an equitable method of protecting and conserving lands determined to have significant environmental value, including large connected wetland systems and significant areas of habitat for listed species; and To provide a viable mechanism for property owners of such environmentally valuable lands to recoup lost value and development potential which may be associated with the application of environmental preservations standards to such lands. ii. Intent . These TDR provisions are intended to accomplish the above stated purpose through an economically viable process of transferring development rights from less suitable non-RFMU sending areas and RFMU sending lands to more suitable non- RFMU receiving areas and RFMU receiving lands . iii. Applicability . These TDR provisions shall be applicable to those areas specifically identified in (b), (c) and (d) below. These TDR provisions shall not be applicable to the any transfer of development rights within the RLSA District. b. Transfer of development rights from urban areas to urban areas. An owner of land located within areas designated as urban on the Future Land Use Map, including agriculturally zoned properties, which may or may not be identified with the ST overlay, may elect to transfer some or all of the residential development rights from one parcel of land to another parcel , as an alternative to the development of the sending lands. The lands to 3.C.f Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) which the development rights are to be transferred shall be referred to as receiving lands and those lands from which development rights are transferred shall be referred to as sending lands, as provided herein and shall be located within the urban designated areas of the county. i. The development rights shall be considered as interests in real property and be transferred in portions or as a total as provided in this section. Once used, the residential development rights shall not be used again and the residential development rights of the subject lands providing them shall be considered severed forever. ii. The transfer of development rights to be used shall be subject to all of the requirements of the basic zoning district to which they are transferred unless specifically approved otherwise as provided by law. iii. The minimum area of land eligible for the transfer of development rights shall be equal to the minimum lot size for the sending zone. For the purposes of this section, legal non-conforming lots of record may be eligible to transfer density , with the minimum area of the receiving land equal to the area of the legal non-conforming lot of record , excluding submerged land. iv. Upon the approval of the transfer of residential development rights by a super majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners, the property owner of the sending land shall dedicate in fee simple the land to the county or a state or federal agency; however, the lands may be dedicated in fee simple to a private, not-for-profit conservation or environmental organization in accordance with F.S. § 704.06, as amended, with the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. v. The maximum number of residential units which may be requested for transfer shall be compiled on the basis of the permitted density pursuant to the underlying zoning category of the sending land. vi. Maximum number of residential units which eligible lands may receive. a) Lands in all residential zoning districts and residential components of planned unit development zoning districts are eligible to receive residential development units provided that the maximum number of residential units which may be transferred to the receiving land does not exceed ten percent of the maximum number of residential units permitted under the receiving property's basic zoning district. For the purpose of determining the number of residential units which a parcel of land is capable of receiving, the following formulas shall apply: i) RSF-1 through RSF-5 districts, up to and including five units per acre: Units per base density × 10% = .1 to .5 units per acre ii) RMF-6 district, up to and including six units per acre: 6 units × 10% = 0.6 units per acre iii) RMF-12 district, seven to and including 12 units per acre: 12 units × 10% = 1.20 units per acre iv) RMF-16 district: 16 units × 5% = 0.80 units per acre v) RT district: 16 units × 5% = 0.80 units per acre vi) PUD district: 3.C.f Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Residential tract units × 5% = permitted units per acre b) For the purpose of calculating the final fractional residential unit of the total number of residential units eligible for transfer to an eligible parcel of land, the following shall apply: Any fractional residential unit shall be converted upward if one-half or more of a whole unit, or downward if less than one-half of a whole unit, to the nearest whole unit value. vii. Procedure for obtaining transfer of residential development rights. Any owner of eligible land may apply for a transfer of development rights either separately or concurrently with rezoning, zoning ordinance amendments, preliminary subdivision plat or development plan. Prior to the approval of any transfer of development rights or the issuance of any building permits in connection with the use of any transfer of development rights, the petitioner shall submit the following information and data, as applicable to the petition, to the development services director for his review and subsequent action by the Board of County Commissioners a) Name and address of property owner of sending land. b) Name and address of property owner of receiving land. c) Legal description of sending land from which transfer of residential development rights is petitioned. d) Survey of sending land from which transfer of residential development rights is requested. e) Legal description of receiving land which receives the transfer of residential development rights. f) Survey of the land which receives the transfer of residential development rights. g) Three copies of an executed deed of transfer of ownership of the sending property to the county or a state or federal agency; however, the lands may be dedicated in fee simple to a private, not-for-profit conservation or environmental organization in accordance with F.S. § 704.06, as amended, with the approval of the Board of County Commissioners in a form approved by the county attorney. h) The owner of the sending land shall provide a guarantee, agreeable to and approved by ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners, that the sending land will be utilized only for the purposes of increasing public recreational and/or educational opportunities, creation of linkages between public or private open space , protection of critical habitat/ecosystems, or other public purpose as specified in the ordinance of adoption. Such a guarantee shall be recorded with the clerk of the circuit court of Collier County, Florida as a recorded restriction of the use of such land and shall be binding upon all present and subsequent owners, heirs, or assigns of such property. Such restrictions may not be amended, deleted, or otherwise altered, except by a majority vote of the BCC. viii. Time limitations on Board of County Commissioners' approval of transfer of residential development rights or authorization to proceed with the processing of a building construction permit. The Board of County Commissioners' approval of a transfer of residential development rights or the County Manager or his designee authorization to proceed with the processing of a building or construction permit shall be valid so long as such approval is permitted by law. The failure to act on the part of the petitioner to exercise the transfer of residential development rights or obtain and exercise an authorized building or construction permit within the time period provided by law shall automatically terminate such approval and the county shall be held harmless for any damages arising out of the petitioner's failure to act. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) ix. Sequential use of residential units approved for transfer by the Board of County Commissioners. Upon the issuance of any permit for the construction of residential unit(s) upon the receiving land, the first residential units built thereon shall be considered to be the residential units approved for transfer by the Board of County Commissioners, and the succeeding residential units constructed shall be considered the residential units permitted under the basic zoning district regulations. c. TDR credits from RFMU sending lands : General Provisions i. Creation of TDR credits . a) TDR credits are generated from RFMU sending lands at a rate of 1 TDR credit per 5 acres of RFMU Sending Land or, for those legal non-conforming lots or parcels of less than 5 acres that were in existence as of June 22, 1999, at a rate of 1 TDR credit per legal non-conforming lot or parcel . b) For lots and parcels 5 acres or larger, the number of TDR credits generated shall be calculated using the following formula: # of acres x 0.2 = # of TDR credits generated. Where the number of TDR credits thus calculated is a fractional number, the number of TDR credits created shall be rounded to the nearest 1/100th. ii. Creation of TDR Bonus credits . TDR Bonus credits shall only be generated from RFMU sending land property from which TDR credits have been severed. The three types TDR Bonus credits are as follows: a) Environmental Restoration and Maintenance Bonus credits . Environmental Restoration and Maintenance Bonus credits are generated at a rate of 1 credit for each TDR credit severed from that RFMU sending land for which a Restoration and Management Plan (RMP) has been accepted by the County. In order to be accepted, a RMP shall satisfy the following: 1) The RMP shall include a listed species management plan. 2) The RMP shall comply with the criteria set forth in 3.05.08.A, and B. 3) The RMP shall provide financial assurance, in the form of a letter of credit or similar financial security, establishing that the RMP shall remain in place and be performed, until the earlier of the following occurs: a. Viable and sustainable ecological and hydrological functionality has been achieved on the property as measured by the success criteria set forth in the RMP. b. The property is conveyed to a County, state, or federal agency as provided in b) below. 4) The RMP shall provide for the exotic vegetation removal and maintenance to be performed by an environmental contractor acceptable to the County. b) Conveyance Bonus credits . Conveyance Bonus credits are generated at a rate of 1 credit for each TDR credit severed from that RFMU sending land that is conveyed in fee simple to a federal, state, or local government agency as a gift. Conveyance Bonus credits shall only be generated from those RFMU sending land properties on which an RMP has been accepted as provided in a) above. c) Early Entry Bonus credits . Early Entry Bonus credits shall be generated at a rate of 1 additional credit for each TDR credit that is severed from RFMU sending land for the period from March 5, 2004, until March 27, 2012. Early Entry Bonus credits shall cease to be generated after the termination of this 3.C.f Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) early entry bonus period. However, Early Entry Bonus credits may continue to be used to increase density in RFMU and non- RFMU Receiving Lands after the termination of the Early Entry Bonus period. iii. Calculation of TDR Bonus credits . a) Environmental Restoration and Maintenance Bonus credits are calculated as follows: # TDR credits generated from property × % property subject to an approved RMP b) Conveyance Bonus credits are calculated as follows: # TDR credits generated from property × % property subject to an approved RMP and conveyed as provided in ii.b) above. c) Early Entry Bonus credits are calculated as follows: # TDR credits generated within Early Entry period × 1. iv. Receipt of TDR credits or TDR Bonus credits from RFMU sending lands . TDR credits or TDR Bonus credits from RFMU sending lands may be redeemed into Urban Areas, the Urban Residential Fringe, and RFMU receiving lands , as provided in subsections 2.03.07 4.d. and e. below. v. Prohibition on redemption of fractional TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits . While fractional TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits may be created, as provided in (ii) above, TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits may only be redeemed in increments of whole, not fractional, dwelling units. Consequently, fractional TDR credits and fractional TDR Bonus credits must be aggregated to form whole units, before they can be utilized to increase density in either non-RFMU Receiving Areas or RFMU Receiving lands . vi. Prohibition on severance of development rights. a) Neither TDR credits nor TDR Early Entry Bonus credits shall be generated from RFMU sending lands where a conservation easement or other similar development restriction prohibits the residential development of such property, with the exception of those TDR Early Entry Bonus credits associated with TDR credits severed from March 5, 2004, until [the effective date of this provision]. Environmental Restoration and Maintenance Bonus credits and Conveyance Bonus credits may only be generated from those RFMU sending lands where a conservation easement or other similar development restriction on development was imposed in conjunction with the severance of TDR credits . b) Neither TDR credits nor any TDR Bonus credits shall be generated from RFMU sending lands that were cleared for agricultural operations after June 19, 2002, for a period of twenty-five (25) years after such clearing occurs. d. Redemption of TDRs into non- RFMU receiving areas . i. Redemption into urban areas. a) Maximum density increase. In order to encourage residential in-fill in urban areas of existing development outside of the Coastal High Hazard Area, a maximum of 3 residential dwelling units per gross acre may be requested through a rezone petition for projects qualifying under this residential infill provisions of the Future Land Use Element density Rating System, subject to the applicable provisions of Chapters 2 and 9 of this Code, and the following conditions: 3.C.f Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) i) The project is 20 acres or less in size; ii) At time of development , the project will be served by central public water and sewer; iii) The property in question has no common site development plan in common with adjacent property; iv) There is no common ownership with any adjacent parcels ; and v) The parcel in question was not created to take advantage of the in-fill residential density bonus and was created prior to the adoption of this provision in the Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989. vi) Of the maximum 3 additional units, one (1) dwelling unit per acre shall be derived from RFMU sending lands and redeemed at Site Plan or prior to Plat recordation. b) Developments which meet the residential infill conditions i) through v) above may increase the base density administratively through a Site Development Plan or Plat approval by a maximum of one dwelling unit per acre by redeeming additional density derived from RFMU district Sending Lands. ii. Redemptions into the Urban Residential Fringe shall be permitted exclusively through the use of TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits derived from RFMU sending lands located within one mile of the Urban Boundary to increase density by a maximum of 1.0 dwelling units per acre, allowing for a density increase from the existing allowable base density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre to a maximum of 2.5 dwelling units per gross acre. e. Redemption into RFMU receiving lands . i. Maximum density on RFMU receiving lands when TDR credits are redeemed. a) The base residential density allowable shall be as provided in sections 2.03.08 A.2.a.(2)(a) and 2.03.08 A.2.b.(3)(a). b) The density achievable through the redemption of TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits into RFMU receiving lands shall be as provided for in section 2.03.08 A.2.a.(2)(b)(i) outside of rural villages and sections 2.03.08 A.2.b.(3)(b) and 2.03.08 A.2.b.(3)(c)(i) inside of rural villages. ii. Remainder uses after TDR credits are severed from RFMU sending lands. Where development rights have been severed from RFMU district Sending Lands, such lands may be retained in private ownership and may be used as set forth in section 2.03.08 A.4.b. f. Procedures applicable to the severance and redemption of TDR credits and the generation of TDR Bonus credits from RFMU sending lands . i. General. Those developments that utilize such TDR credits or TDR Bonus credits are subject to all applicable permitting and approval requirements of this Code, including but not limited to those applicable to site development plans, plat approvals, PUDs, and DRIs. a) The severance of TDR credits and the generation of Early Entry Bonus credits from RFMU sending lands does not require further approval of the County if the County determines that information demonstrating compliance with all of the criteria set forth in ii.a) below has been submitted. However, those developments that utilize such TDR credits and Early Entry Bonus credits are subject to all applicable permitting and approval requirements of this Code, including but not limited to those applicable to site development plans , plat approvals, PUDs, and DRIs. 3.C.f Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) b) The generation of Environmental Restoration and Maintenance Bonus credits and Conveyance Bonus credits requires acceptance by the County of a RMP. ii. In order to facilitate the County's monitoring and regulation of the TDR Program, the County shall serve as the central registry for all TDR severances, transfers (sales) and redemptions , as well as maintain a public listing of TDR credits available for sale along with a listing of purchasers seeking TDR credits . No TDR credit generated from RFMU sending lands may be utilized to increase density in any area unless the following procedures are complied with in full. a) TDR credits shall not be used to increase density in either non-RFMU Receiving Areas or RFMU receiving lands until severed from RFMU sending lands . TDR credits shall be deemed to be severed from RFMU sending lands at such time as a TDR credit Certificate is obtained from the County. TDR credit Certificates shall be issued only by the County and upon submission of the following: i) a legal description of the property from which the RFMU TDR credits originated, including the total acreage; ii) a title opinion establishing that, prior to the severance of the TDR credits from RFMU sending lands , such sending lands were not subject to a conservation restriction or any other development restriction that prohibited residential development ; iii) an affidavit, signed by the owner, stating that the property was not subject to a conservation restriction or any other development restriction that prohibited residential development during the period between the effective date of the title opinion and conservation easement recordation; iv) an executed Limitation of Development Rights Agreement, prepared in accord with the form provided by the County, that limits the allowable uses on the property after the severance of TDR credits as set forth in section 2.03.08 A.4.b.; and v) a statement identifying the price, or value of other remuneration, paid to the owner of the RFMU sending lands from which the TDR credits were generated and that the value of any such remuneration is at least $25,000 per TDR credit , unless such owner retains ownership of the TDR credits after they are severed, unless the RFMU or non- RFMU receiving lands on which the TDR credits will be redeemed and the RFMU sending lands from which the TDR credits were generated are owned by the same persons or entities or affiliated persons or entities; and vi) a statement attesting that the TDR credits are not being severed from RFMU sending lands in violation of subsection 2.03.07 D.4.c.vi.b) of the Code. vii) documented evidence that, if the property from which TDRs are being severed is subject to a mortgage, lien, or any other security interest; the mortgagee, lien holder, or holder of the security interest has consented to the recordation of the Limitation of Development Rights Agreement required for TDR severance; transfer (sale) of TDR credit ; and redemption of TDR credit . b) TDR Bonus credits shall not be used to increase density in either non-RFMU receiving areas or RFMU receiving lands until a TDR credit certificate reflecting the TDR Bonus credits is obtained from the County and recorded. 1) Early Entry Bonus credits . All TDR credit certificates issued by the County for the period from the effective date of this provision until March 27, 2015, 3.C.f Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) unless further extended by resolution by the Board of County Commissioners, shall include one Early Entry Bonus credit or fractional Early Entry Bonus credit for each TDR credit or fractional TDR credit reflected on the TDR credit certificate. Where TDR credits were severed from March 5, 2004, until the effective date of this provision, the County shall, upon receipt of a copy of the TDR credit certificate reflecting those previously severed TDR credits , issue a TDR credit certificate entitling Early Entry Bonus credits equal in number to the previously severed TDR credits . 2) Environmental Restoration and Maintenance Bonus credit . A TDR certificate reflecting Environmental Restoration and Maintenance Bonus credits shall not be issued until the County has accepted a RMP for the sending lands from which the Environmental Restoration and Maintenance Bonus credit is being generated. Any sending lands from which TDR credits have been severed may also be used for mitigation programs and associated mitigation activities and uses in conjunction with any county, state or federal permitting. Where the Environmental Restoration and Maintenance Credit is applied for sending lands that are also being used (title or easement) for mitigation for permits or approvals from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, or the South Florida Water Management District, the County shall accept as the RMP for the sending mitigation lands, the restoration and/or maintenance requirements of permits issued by any of the foregoing governmental agencies for said lands. 3) Conveyance Bonus credit. A TDR certificate reflecting Conveyance Bonus credits shall not be issued until the County has accepted a RMP for the Sending Lands from which the Conveyance Bonus credit is being generated and such sending lands have been conveyed, in fee simple, to a County, state, or federal government agency. c) A PUD or DRI utilizing TDR credits or TDR Bonus credits may be conditionally approved, but no subsequent application for site development plan or subdivision plat within the PUD or DRI shall be approved, until the developer submits the following: i) documentation that the developer has acquired all TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits needed for that phase of the development that is the subject of the site development plan or subdivision plat. d) The developer shall provide documentation of the acquisition of full ownership and control of all TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits needed for the development prior to the approval of any site development plan, subdivision plat, or other final local development order, other than a PUD or DRI. e) Each TDR credit shall have an individual and distinct tracking number, which shall be identified on the TDR certificate that reflects the TDR credit . The County TDR Activity Log shall maintain an ongoing database that categorizes all TDR credits relative to severance, transfer (sale) and redemption activity. f) Each TDR Bonus credit shall have an individual and distinct tracking number, which shall be identified on the TDR certificate and which shall identify the specific TDR credit associated with the TDR Bonus credit . The County TDR Registry shall maintain a record of all TDR Bonus credits , to include a designation of those that have been expended. g) The County bears no responsibility to provide notice to any person or entity holding a lien or other security interest in Sending Lands that TDR credits have 3.C.f Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) been severed from the property or that an application for such severance has been filed. g. Proportional utilization of TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits . Upon the issuance of approval of a site development plan or subdivision plat that is part of a PUD or DRI, TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits shall be redeemed at a rate proportional to percentage of the PUD or DRI's approved gross density that is derived through TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits . All PUDs and DRIs utilizing TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits shall require that the rate of TDR credit and TDR Bonus credits consumption be reported through the monitoring provisions of section 10.02.12 and subsection 10.02.07.C.1.b of this Code. 5. In accordance with § 380.05, F.S. and chapter 73-131 Laws of Florida, the administrative commission instituted regulations for the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern "ACSC". The purpose of these regulations is to conserve and protect the natural, environmental, and economic resources of the Big Cypress area. Furthermore, these regulations are to provide a land and water management system that will preserve water quality, provide for the optimum utilization of the limited water resources of the area, facilitate orderly and well-planned development , and protect the health, safety and welfare of residents of the state. The Florida Administrative Code establishes criteria for site alteration, drainage, transportation facilities and structure installation. These regulations are implemented through the land development regulations as set forth in section 4.02.14. An overlay zoning classification to be known as Area of Critical State Concern/Special Treatment Overlay shall be designated on the Official Zoning Atlas with symbol ACSC-ST. § 3.D; Ord. No. 19-09, § 3) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.06.00 - GROUNDWATER PROTECTION 3.06.01 - Purpose and Intent A. The purpose of this section is to establish standards, regulations, and procedures for the review and approval of existing and proposed development within mapped wellfield protection zones in the unincorporated area and the incorporated areas of the County. The standards and regulations of this section shall be implemented to protect existing and future wellfields, protect natural aquifer system recharge areas, protect Countywide groundwater resources, and to protect the public health and resources through regulation and establishment of standards for development involving the use, storage, generation, handling, and disposal of quantities of hazardous products and hazardous waste in excess of identified quantities, disposal of sewage and effluent, stormwater management, earthmining, petroleum exploration, solid waste , and other related aspects of land use and development . B. It is the intent of the BCC that this section implement and be consistent with the Collier County GMP. Implementation will provide for the long-term protection of the County's groundwater resource, and through the management of those land uses and developments within wellfield management special treatment overlay zones and Countywide groundwater protection zones, ensure short-term protection. This section is intended to be consistent with principles of property rights, as balanced with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. C. In order to protect the County's potable groundwater resources, this section establishes Countywide groundwater protection standards, implemented through a Countywide groundwater protection zone, and a series of wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zones around identified public water supply wellfields. These special treatment overlay zones and groundwater protection zone form the basis of land use management prohibitions and regulations to reduce or eliminate the potential for groundwater contamination from specified land uses and activities. 3.06.02 - Protected Public Water Supply Wellfields A. The public water supply wellfields, identified in section 3.06.06 and permitted by the SFWMD for potable water to withdraw a minimum of 100,000 average gallons per day (GPD), are identified as protected wellfields, around which specific land use and activity (regulated development ) shall be regulated under this section. B. There are hereby created wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zones around each existing public water supply wellfield permitted by the SFWMD, to withdraw a minimum of 100,000 average gallons per day or more. These wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zones are generally depicted on wellfield protection zone maps and are made a part hereof as Illustration 3.06.02 A. Wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zones shall be supplemental to existing and future zoning and land use regulations, and shall not be deemed to permit or authorize any use or activity not otherwise permitted in the underlying zoning district or allowable in the underlying future land use designation. 3.06.03 - Description and Basis of Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones Wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zones are derived from the three-dimensional computer-modeled analysis of groundwater flow and solute transport in the County's freshwater aquifer system, as prepared and presented in a study commissioned by the County and known as the "Three- Dimensional Simulation of Wellfield Protection Areas in Collier County, Florida" (Voorhees and Mades, 1989) (the three-dimensional wellfield study). A. Wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone W-1 (zone W-1). The land area between an identified wellfield and the five (5) percent groundwater capture zone, approximating the one (1) year wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone boundary, as shown on the wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone map, Illustration 3.06.02 A, which area shall be protected from the discharge or accidental release of 3.C.f Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) contaminants from a sanitary hazard or other contaminant source, including the discharge or accidental release of hazardous products and hazardous wastes . B. Wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone W-2 (zone W-2). The land area between zone W-1 and the ten (10) percent groundwater capture zone, approximating the two (2) year wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone boundary, as shown on the wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone map, Illustration 3.06.02 A, which area shall be protected from the discharge or accidental release of contaminants, including from a sanitary hazard or other contaminant source and the discharge or accidental release of hazardous products and hazardous wastes . C. Wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone W-3 (zone W-3). The land area between zone W-2 and the twenty-five (25) percent groundwater capture zone, approximating the five (5) year wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone boundary, as shown on the wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone map, Illustration 3.06.02 A, which area may be protected from the discharge or accidental release of specific contaminants, including the discharge or accidental release of hazardous products and hazardous wastes . D. Wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone W-4 (zone W-4). The land area between zone W-3 and the 100 percent groundwater capture zone for the twenty (20) year planning limit, which is the twenty (20) year wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone boundary, as shown on the wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone map, Illustration 3.06.02 A, which area may be protected from the discharge or accidental release of specific contaminants, including the discharge or accidental release of hazardous products and hazardous wastes . 3.06.04 - Groundwater Protection A. There are hereby created groundwater protection special treatment overlay zones, as generally depicted on the wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone maps, Illustration 3.06.02 A. These groundwater protection special treatment overlay zones reflect wellfield risk management zones W-1, W-2, W-3, and W-4; areas of high natural aquifer recharge in the County (ST-NAR), and the natural recharge areas of the County that require minimum groundwater protection and within which future public water supply wells may be located (GWP). B. Wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zones, high natural aquifer recharge special treatment zones (ST-NAR), and groundwater protection special treatment overlay zones shall be supplemental to existing and future zoning and land use regulations, and shall not be deemed to permit or authorize any use or activity not otherwise permitted in the underlying zoning district or allowable in the underlying future land use designation. C. The high natural aquifer recharge special overlay zones (ST-NAR) and the groundwater protection zones (GWP) are based upon: 1. Those portions of the County identified as areas of high natural aquifer recharge to the surficial and intermediate aquifer systems (ST-NAR). 2. The susceptibility of the surficial and intermediate aquifer systems in the County to contamination resulting from surficial activities and the need for protection of the groundwater resource as a future public water supply (GWP). D. High natural aquifer recharge areas (ST-NAR). These areas have not yet been defined. The prohibitions and regulations for this special treatment overlay zone shall be based upon the determination and designation of those portions of the County that naturally function as high natural recharge areas to the surficial and intermediate aquifer systems. Upon identification of ST-NAR areas, pursuant to these regulations, shall be amended to include the ST-NAR special treatment overlay zone where appropriate. E. Groundwater protection area (GWP). All of the County provides natural aquifer recharge to the water table aquifer , and the potential for natural aquifer recharge to the unconfined or semi- 3.C.f Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) confined portions of the Lower Tamiami and Sandstone aquifers . Natural aquifer recharge from the water table aquifer constitutes approximately eighty (80) percent of the recharge to the Lower Tamiami aquifer on a regional basis. That area of the County, excluding W-1, W-2, W-3, W-4, and ST-NAR, shall be provided with a minimum level of groundwater protection and shall be designated as GWP. 3.06.05 - Annual Review of Zones The wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone maps, Illustration 3.06.02 A, shall be reviewed by the BCC on an annual basis, or more often as may be determined by the County Manager or designee in his discretion upon the occurrence of: A. Changes in technical knowledge concerning the understanding of groundwater hydraulics, as applied to the hydrogeology of applicable aquifer systems in the County. B. Changes in the permitted withdrawals from the identified wellfield(s). C. Reconfiguration of identified wellfields. D. The designation of new wellfield(s) as protected under this section. E. Availability of any other technical or scientific information relative to the aquifer systems in the County. 3.06.06 - Regulated Wellfields The following wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zones, as defined in section 3.06.03, and criteria specified herein shall be applied to the following wellfields: A. City of Naples East Golden Gate Well Field. B. City of Naples Coastal Ridge Well Field. C. Collier County Utilities Golden Gate Well Field. D. Everglades City Well Field. E. Florida Governmental Utility Authority Golden Gate City Well Field. F. Orange Tree Well Field. G. Immokalee Well Field. H. Ave Maria Utility Company Well Field. I. Port of the Islands Well Field. COLLIER COUNTY UTILITIES GOLDEN GATE WELL FIELD 3.C.f Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Illustration 3.06.06 C. For more detailed information, refer to the Collier County Zoning Map at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=992 3.C.f Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) State of Florida Department of State I certify from the records of this office that IGNITE WIRELESS, INC. is a Georgia corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida, qualified on June 30, 2020. The document number of this corporation is F20000003016. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2020 and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the Fourteenth day of July, 2020 Tracking Number: 2808137266CU To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number, and then follow the instructions displayed. https://services.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertificateOfStatus/CertificateAuthentication 3.C.f Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.f Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: Attachment E- Application-Backup Materials (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Timothy.fi nn@col I iercountyfl .gov Subject: Oppositional Letter to variance application PL20l 90002701 Dear Mr. Finn and others to whom it may concem: My family and I submit this letter in opposition to the above numbered application for permitting, including the seeking of a variance. The above application would seek to allow construction of a very tall Communication Tower on a very small parcel ofland by substituting for certain setback requirememts. The parcel is located immediately nexi to and is contiguous to land on which my family and I reside in a "Dome" we call "Dome of the Glades" and which I would describe, perhaps too poetically, as follows: The Dome ofthe Glades is a gorgeous geodesic dome residence designed by architect Buckminster Fuller. It is located less than fourteen miles, as the crow flies, from the beautiful white sand beaches of the Gulf of Mexico.The land was purchased 50 years ago by the current owners and is in a protected area which has remained pristine. Until the 21" century the Dome was so remotely located, few people even kner,l of its existence. About two decades ago, Collier county adopted and still retains what has been touted as an "innovative" program meant to protect wetlands,wildlife and habitat from unrestrained growth. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District limited the real estate ownership rights for personi holding land in either the designated "sending" or "receiving" areas, which include the small parcel now seeking a variance. The program ivwas designed to "direct growth potential to appropriate locations." The county, assured land holders that this plan was not inverse condemnation since the "taking" ofthese real property rights would be paid for, as to the "sending" areas, by allowing development credits to be sold to those in the "receiving" area. As to the "receiving" area, limitations on density and other restrictions would remain in place but could be removed by pwchasing development ,'credits" from sending areas. Allowing the construction of a huge Communication Tower in the very center of areas which have reliantly remained pristine, is totally contrary to the plan Collier County assured citizens they could depend on. To illustrate, when Ave Maria was initiated, also several decades ago, a plan which is, in part, almost word for word the same plan as the Rural Fringe plan here, also had receiving areas which invited development ofthoughtful and desirable villages. The building ofa huge communications Tower in what is now the center of Ave Maria would certainly never have been allowed. Our community, which we and our neighbors refer to as North Belle Meade has evolved very slowly but "naturally" until now. It's beauty and "old Florida" character display potential for becoming a cultural center to exhibit how humankind can (and perhaps must) respect and leam to live with nature rather than to control it. Other factors in opposition include: L Failure ofproper notification. A letter from Ignite Wireless stated that someone would be contacting me "directly within the next few days...." about a variance which would "not adversely affect [my] property interest". The letter which was dated June 22, 2020 was not postmarked until July 01, 2020 and, with delivery time, was already way past the "nexr few days". ln fact no one has contacted me directly. My neighbor, who's property is contiguous to mine, first informed me. 2. As to my above mentioned neighbor, another tower located within, roughly, 118 mile of the instant tower, has been applied-for. That tower would sit directly north of this neighbor's residence in full view of his superbly manicured home and show horse farm. We both oppose both towers. 3. Construction and operation ofthe instant tower would inliinge on a legally established 3.C.g Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: Attachment F - Opposition Letters (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) prescriptive easement ofuse for cattle exchange connecting my property to that of Mr. Stahlman whose land lies immediately west of the proposed tower location. This easement, while not recorded, is visible and meets the legally required time frame.4. An existing tower, taller than the proposed tower, is within 3 miles. There may also be other existing towers which the undersigned has yet to leam about.5. The proposed tower property owner is not seeking this variance. A lessee whose lease is presumably contingent on being able to build this tower is thus not adversely affected by a failure to succeed in doing so. There are many tracts of land in the general area, but away from established neighborhoods, which are potentially available. Indeed collier County may itself ou,n such property and, ifso, may be legally obligated to offer it for a Tower purpose pusuant to code. 6. There exists a bam within reach of this tower should it fail. The bam is packed with antique farming equipment, some of which may not be replaceable. We anticipate, within the near future, that this machinery will play an essential role in the devolopment ofAgritourism on the property pursuant to F.S. 570.85. A huge Communication Tower next to the bam destroys the farm-like environment and, should humans be in the barn they may well be injured or killed. The above described objections are not necessarily all inclusive. Thank you very much. Please acknowledge receipt. J. Richard Smith, Trustee, 380 Frangipani Ave, Naples Fl 34117 3.C.g Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: Attachment F - Opposition Letters (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) FinnTimoth From: SGnt To: Subjcct: Richard Smith < seasmithzl42002@gmail.com > Monday, August 24, 2020 8:47 AM FinnTimothy P1201 90002701 Oppositional letter ExrER N AL EMAIL: This emall is from an extcrnalsource. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or cllcklng llnks. Dear Mr. Finn; ln addition to items discussed in a previous oppositional letter dated August 16, 2020, in the above matter, I draw your attention to the following items of opposition: 7. There are numerous miSrating birds which pass overhead, where we and the proposed tower are located. A 225 ft tower will most likely interfere with their passage. Other birds, fauna and species may well also be adversely impacted. 8.lt is Senerally accepted that new 5G technology will soon be available. As to 5G towers, it is said that " While most current cell towers are large, freestanding behemoths, the cell towers of the future are smaller devices which companies aim to mount onto lampposts, rooftops, traffic lights and other appropriate spots...". (see www.the whizcells.com). Communication tor rers, such as the one proposed above, will very soon be obsolete, serving no necessary function but remaining as a blight on the North Belle Meade community. 9. The proposed tower would constitute an infringement or invasion of a right to privacy recognized, by the U.5. Supreme Court and also available pursuant to Amendment 9 of the U.S. Constitution. lt is very easy to also envision a violation of our ri8ht of protection from unlawful searches. My property is immediately (literally within 15-20 feet) next to the proposed tower. lmagine, if you will, going out of your door every day or night not knowing what camera or other device could be available to this tower for police surveillance. lt is, afterall, said to be built, in part, for police use. 10. The proposed Tower, by its very nature, will be an unsi8htly disturbance for the entire neighborhood and, by using this site, nothinS is being done to avoid "adverse visual impact... through careful siting." as called for by the code. (5.05'09A). There is within the same general area vacant property, for example, owned by the Collier county School District, as well as other Collier County owned land which would meet the code's requirement that use of government owned property must be considered, where available. 11. Mosquito control low flying planes frequently fly east-west along the southern edge of Golden Gate Estates, precisely where this tower would be located. Thus, it creates a hazard and would interfere in such needed routes. Once built, this entire area will lack adequate needed mosquito control. 12. As previously stated, the area in question is designated "rural fringe", an overlay whose purpose is protection for land of "critical concern". lf protection of a NRPA, within close reach, can be ignored in "receiving lands", such receiving lands here, lack the lgM required to even be part of the designated "rural fringe". That result clearly threatens the 1gA! status of a "rural fringe" not only in North Belle Meade but elsewhere in the county. (see Koon2 v. St John's River Manacemen t District 133 5. Ct. 2585.570 U5 595,Supreme Court , 2013.) 13.The proposed tower fails to meet requirements of code 5.05.09G(7)(b) which provides, in part, that the tower must be at a distance of at least yI of its height, or 112.5 feet (assuming no antennas)from the boundary of my property. 14. The proposed tower would be required to have white strobing lights at alltimes, every single night, without let-up. Being so close to such constant invasion of peace and serenity is a severe burden. lt destroys the very reason my family and I purchased this property some 50 years a8o. lt also results in interference with other wildlife habitat. I 3.C.g Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: Attachment F - Opposition Letters (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) From: Luisa Soler <lsoler999@ gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2020 4:18 PM To: CastroGa briela <Ga briela.Castro@ colliercountvfl.sov> Subject: Cell Tower EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello Gabri, Ref:PL:20200000885 and PL:20190002701 As a real estate professional I am really surprised that Collier County is considering permitting a cell tower in the receiving area. The value of land and property will go down because of the ugly tower. What about our health hazards? We, as the land owner, will be stuck in here. These towers will cause hardship on all of us not able to sell and extremely high risk of radiation. Park next to one tower and listen to the sound of death. Proposed tower will be less than 550 ft to my bed. ls fanny 550 FrangipaniAve property owners do not reside at this address, that is kind of ridiculous. We have real people living here. I am requesting from you and county officials to deny permit for these towers, on the grounds that they causing hardship and harm to residents. Sincerely, [UISA SOTER 1160 Sugarberry ST Naples, FL 34117 3.C.g Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: Attachment F - Opposition Letters (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) From: Sent: To: Subject: Richard Smith < seasmith442002@gmail.com> Thursday, September 10, 20?0 2:M PM VelascoJessica Re: Variance lnformation for P120190002701 - Kapok St SLC009 AT&T FirstNet Cell Tower (VA) EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Variance lnformation for PL20190002701- Kapok St Thank you, Ms. Velasco for the prompt response. ln reviewing the variance application I see numerous legal barriers to the application. Without listing all of them at this time, I do request that this message be considered as opposition to the variance application. Two issues, in opposition raise immediate barriers, but several others will be forthcoming if necessary: 1. The hardship does not arise from the land, but rather from the proposed project. 2. Any hardship was "self imposed". The owner and/or lessee are not permitted to propose a project which violates code at the time of purchase or lease, and then claim hardship because of the project they desire to create.The hardship must run with the land, not the project. Please also consider this message as my request to be notified promptly should any meeting or discussion concerning this application be scheduled or when my input could be beneficial for your consideration as to my opposition. Thank you kindly, J. Richard Smith Good morning Mr. Smith, Per our conversation, I am attaching the project narrative and additional information on this project. I am including the link to our public portal where you can see all of the documents that has been subm itted for this project. please keep in mind that this project is still in review and it requires a hearing, before it being approved. Client Portal: httos://cvoortal.collierc ountvfl.sov/CitvViewWeb/ 1. U nder Planning Department a. Status and fees Enter Captcha ii. EnterP120190002701 1. Under documents and images a. You will be able to see everything that the applicant has submitted to date 1 VelascoJessica On Thu,5ep 10, 2020 at 11:56 AM VelascoJessica <Jessica.Velasco@colliercountvfl.sov> wrote: 3.C.g Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: Attachment F - Opposition Letters (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Jessica.velasco@colliercountvfl.gov Respectfully, r/ecciaa l/o/acoo Client Services, Project Coordinator Operations and Regulatory Management Division "We're committed to your successl" 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Telephone (239) 252-2584 Visit our website at: www.colliercountvfl.sov NOIE: Emoll Addt.tt Hos Ctongcd 2800 Norlh Horieshoe Drlve, Noples Florldo 34104 Clienr Servlces: 23t.252. t036 Phone: 23t.252.2584 How are we doinB? The Operations & Regulatory Management Division wants to hear from you! 2 3.C.g Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: Attachment F - Opposition Letters (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) Please take our online SURVEY We oppreciote your feedbock! Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. lf you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. lnslead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 3 3.C.g Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: Attachment F - Opposition Letters (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) FinnTimot From: Sent: To: Subject: CastroGabriela Wednesday, September 9, 2020 9:31 AM FinnTimothy FW: Cell Tower Hey Tim, I received this email regarding these two projects I will go ahead and add it to both projects just wanted to send it to you as you are the planner for the variance. Thanks ! Respectfully, Gabriela Castro, AICP Senior Planner C,Rfr,County Developmen, Review Divilion Exceeding Expecrolio ns, Eyery Dqy! NOIE: Emqll Addrerr Hor Chonged 2E00 Norlh Horrerhoe Drlve, Noples Florldo 34104 Phone: 239-252-240E How are we doing? Please CLTCK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey We appreciate your Feedback! From: Luisa Soler <lsoler999@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2020 4:18 PM To: CastroGabriela <Gabriela.Castro@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Cell Tower EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello Gabri, Ref:PL:20200000885 and PL:20190002701 As a real estate professional I am really surprised that Collier County is considering permitting a cell tower in the receiving area. The value of land and property wlll go down because of the ugly tower. What about our health hazards? We, as the land owner, will be stuck in here. These towers will cause hardship on all of us not able to sell and extremely high risk of radiation. Park next to one tower and listen to the sound of death. Proposed tower will be less than 550 ft to my bed. ls fanny 550 Frangipani Ave property owners do not reside at this address, that is kind of ridiculous. We have 1 3.C.g Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: Attachment F - Opposition Letters (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) real people living here. I am requesting from you and county officials to deny permit for these towers, on the grounds that they causing hardship and harm to residents. Sincerely, LUISA SOTER U5O Sugarberry ST Naples, Ft !i4117 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. lf you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. lnstead, contact this office by telephone or in wriling. 2 3.C.g Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: Attachment F - Opposition Letters (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) F naucrpANr Ac Conauunrry Ctvrc AssocnrroN, rNC. 5I2 FRANGIPANI AVENUE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34rr7 Collier County Growth Management 2800 Horseshoe Dr. N Naples, FL34104 October 21,2020 Dear Collier County Growth Management, The Frangipani Ag Community Civic Association serves residents and properry owners in an area of three square miles in North Belle Meade. At our board meeting on October 14,2020 our agenda included the issue of two proposed cell towers. They are identified as follows: Kapok St. PL20190002701 seeking a variance, and Frangipani St. PL20200000886 seeking an SDP. There was an extensive discussion. The members expressed many concerns, the main ones being: l. The Kapok St. tower application variance is being requested by a lessee, not the land owner. There are plenty of other uses for this lot in addition to the potential to sell the lot. We do not believe there is undue hardship in this situation, therefore we do not believe a variance should be granted. 2. This is one of the last beautiful natural residential areas of Collier County. Having one or both of these towers will be a detriment to the county's protected area. 3. The towers are proposed in RFMUD Receiving zoning. We believe these towers will inhibit the plan of the RFMUD. 4. There are other towers within 6 miles of these sites that should be explored for the possibility of co-locating before these towers are built. These existing towers have access points already established, and should be utilized to their maximum capacity before additional towers should be permitted. 5. Residents are concerned with the constant flashing waming lights illuminating the surrounding area, disturbing the rural character of the neighborhood as originally protected and planned by Collier County. Every resident of our North Belle Meade community places an extremely high value on privacy. 6. We propose other commercial areas for the towers, with an already complete and very capable infrastructure, as well as much easier access and security, such as: Wilson Blvd. & Golden Gate Blvd., and Everglades BIvd. & Golden Gate Blvd. These locations would better serve the community as a whole with upgraded service provided for many more outlying and congested residents. We request this letter be added to both project records and recorded as our opposition to the construction of both towers. Sincerely, Mitchell Penner President, Frangipani Ag Community Civic Association FACCA34I l7@gmail.com 3.C.g Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: Attachment F - Opposition Letters (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) FinnTimothy From: Sent: To: Subject: Richard Smith < seasmith442002@gmail.com > Tuesday, October 27, 2020 12:31 PM FinnTimothy; doug@tllfirm.com; Melanie Penner Re: Kapok Letter EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:47 AM FinnTimothy <Timothv. Fin n @colliercou ntvfl.sov> wrote: Timothy Finn, AICP Principol Plonner te'r C-ournty Zoning Division NOIE: New EmoilAddress os of 1210912017 Timothy.Finn@co lliercounlvf l.oov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Noples Florido 34104 ?hone:239.252.4312 Tell us how we ore doing by toking our Zoning Division SuNey ot htto://bit.lvlcollierzonins 1 Following our phone conversation, you forwarded to me the attached "property owner letter" . I had been inquiring concerning details of the HEX meeting and you mentioned that this letter should have been sent to me on October 23, 2020. Perhaps it was, but as I mentioned to you, no such letter has yet been received. The time restrictions mentioned in the letter: only 5 minutes to speak and no documents unless submitted 10 days prior, are very restrictive. This matter is of grave concern, not only to me, but to our entire neighborhood. I would request a loosening of these restrictions. Thank you very much, J.Richard Smith 3.C.g Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Attachment F - Opposition Letters (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) FinnTimothy From: Sent: To: Subject: mikebfishy@aol.com Wednesday, October 28, 2020 9:22 PM FinnTimothy ISUSPICIOUS MESSAGEI The sender may trick victims into passing bad checks on their behalf.kapok tower / frangipani EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. EXTERNAL EM,AIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Tim, my name is Mike Brower . I am the owner of 320 Frangipani ave. I purchased the property several years ago and have an agricultural palm tree farm there now. The proposed tower will severally diminish the value of my property. I own the access entry to lhe easement that would give the tower owners access . First I find it strange that the county owned property nearby where the wells are placed would not be available for such commercial use . I purchased the property in anticipation of a development opportunity eventually in the last receivable land for such development. My property would not be a desirable placed to be used for a residence if it is allowed to go in. I believe lwould be damaged by such invasion of a severely large metallic structure. And lalso believe there is evidence that the tower and its transmission are safe and should therefore not be allowed in a residential area so close lo human dwellings . I am apposed to the variance use of the nearby property. Sincerely, Mike Brower / Brower enterprises llc. 1 3.C.g Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Attachment F - Opposition Letters (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) VARIANCE PETITIION APPLICATION (PL20190002701)  KAPOK STREET, NAPLES, FL 34117  PARCEL ID# 00307840002  RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENT: TIMOTHY FINN #3  Staff comment:  Pursuant to LDC 5.05.09(D)(E) and (F) for shared tower use, please demonstrate that either you can or can not  work an arrangement for a shared tower use? Please see the Collier County Communication Towers Map as  Towers 1 and 18 are in proximity to the Kapok St Cell Tower property. Moreover, there is an Site Development  Plan (SDP) application (PL20200000886) for a proposed cell tower to be located at 550 Frangipani Avenue located  approximately 2065 feet to the east of the Kapok St Cell Tower property. Please explain why you can't share this  tower?  Response:  While we would consider any offer for another entity/provider to share the proposed tower on Kapok St., we are  not aware of any other towers that would provide necessary and adequate capacity and geographic coverage area  to achieve our objectives, and sharing another tower at another location is not a feasible option.  To our  knowledge, there is no applicable separation requirement with respect to a tower at the Kapok St. location relative  to other towers in the vicinity.  As to the SDP application (PL20200000886) referenced in the staff comment, which relates to a proposed 185’  tower over 2,000 feet away from the proposed Kapok St. tower, that application was submitted on 7/27/2020,  according to the County’s website.  The proposed Kapok St. tower is 250’, over 1/3 higher than the tower if the  application referenced by staff.  While the application for PL20200000886 was submitted on July 27, 2020, in the case of the Kapok St. Tower, a  preapplication meeting was first held November 12, 2019.  As a result of that meeting, applicant prepared a  variance application, and a second pre‐application meeting was held on December 4, 2019 for the variance.  At the  December 4, 2019 pre‐application meeting, applicant was advised (in error) that the tower use was not allowed by  right, and that a conditional use would be required.  Following a subsequent application for zoning interpretation, on March 17, 2020, staff formally determined the  use was a permitted use at this location, and that a conditional use was not required, but reiterated that a variance  would be necessary.  Applicant has since filed the variance application that is presently under review.    Applicant first formally requested approval requirements for the tower in August 2019 (see ZLTR‐PL20190001999),  and has been diligently pursuing approval of the tower since then. Applicant has engaged in sincere, costly, and  diligent efforts over the past 11 months.  This has included two pre‐application meetings, two ZVL’s, and  uncertainty created by erroneous “conditional use” instruction. Given Applicant’s significant efforts, the lack of any  codified tower separation requirement, the lack of any record of any tower application being filed until 7/27/2020,  and the significant investment incurred to date, it is appropriate for Applicant to move forward with its plans at  this location, which have been a matter of public record for almost a year.  Concurrent with these efforts, Applicant notified the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) of its plans, and the  FAA issued a formal “Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation” on October 23, 2019 for the proposed Kapok  St. tower.  FAA notification is the industry standard for putting other would‐be tower owners on notice that there  is a tower application pending. The tower application referenced by staff (PL20200000886) has not, to our  knowledge, registered with or received any such determination from the FAA.  Date: 8.4.20203.C.h Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Attachment G - Shared Tower Use Response (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) st(;\ lros'il\(; t\s rRt ( Tl0\s (C'I.l,'\PTER {I. COLLIER ('OL'\T\' AD\II\IST'R.\I-I\ E ('0DE FOR I..A\D DE\'ELOP\IENT) A zonins signls; nrust be posled b1 the petitioner or lhe petitioner's isent on the parcel tirr a mininturrr ol'tifteen ( l 5) calendar dals in aclrance of thc lirst puhlic hearing and said sign(s) nrust hc rnairrtained b-r tlrc petitiorreror tltc petitioner's agcnt throuch thc Board ol'('()urlL) ('r)tllnlissioners llearins. Belorv are Seneral guidclines for signs. ht-,rvever these guidclirres should not bc construed to supcrscde an) rL'quirerncrtt of thc l-D('. Jrc'r specitic sign rctluirolents. plcasc rcter to the .\dnrinistratir,e Code. ('hapter 8 E. l. I'hc'sign(s) rrrust be r'rected in full lierv of the public. rrot nrore than tirc 1-i) t'ec.t t'ronr thc nearl,st strecr right-ot:way or easenlertl. :. l'he sign(s)ntust he securell'atliriecl b_r'nails. staplE-s. rrr other rneans to a rvood linrrre r'l'lo a s'ood panel and thc.n fasts'ned securel) to a 1x)sl trr other struclurc. The sign nla-\ uot he afll.red to a trce or other lbliage. i. The petitioner or lhe petitioner's agenl must maintain the sign(s) in place. and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a tlnal decision rendered. lf the sirrn(s) is destro_rr'd. losr. or rendcred unreadable. the petitioner or the petitioner's agent trrust replace the sign(s \O'I't'-: .\FT'Ell I'1lL Sl(;\ ll\S BEt.\ POSfI.]l).'tlllS \I.FlD,\\l-l'O['I,OSTINC NO't-!('E Sll0lrl.D BE R[r"l R\[D \O 1..\'t'[.R Tlt\\'I'r.\ (ilt) \\'oRKt\(; t),r\s Br]],'oRt. 1-l$. l.tRs'I'HE.\Rt\(; D,\l'u t'o t-iltl ,\sst(;\ [_D Pt..\\ \ DR. -{TITID.\\'II OT POSTINC NOIICI: S'[.\'f t: OF (iEC)R( ;l .\ (.()T \TY OF I.ORS\'TH B tJtTC)RI, I'I]F. L \ DHRSICNI., t),.\I. TI IOR II'\ . PERSoNAI-L Y APPE.{REI')KENDr\t. L.OTZE \\'llo o\ o,\Tl I s.\\'s Tl IAT IlI sl IIl I I\s PosT[D PRopt.R \OTtCl- AS RI-Qt]tRt:D l]y SU("ilo\ 10.0-1.00 ()[ ll lI: ('oL.t-ll,R ( ot N rY L.\\D DEYb.l_oP\lEN',l ('oDr. oN -rHF P.\R('F.t_ ('O\ l-.RLD t\ l'[t lTt()N Nt !\.ltit.R \ ..\-P1.:0 I ()(x)0170 I fu.L 4 d-'-P>r-102 \lary.,\lice l)ark Rd. Suitc 505 SI(i\ \T'I'RE OF .\PPI-IC'\\T oR:\CE\'I' l..ertdal Lrrtzc \..\\ll: ( lYPt.l) OR PRI\ l tjD) s lA l!: ()lj FL-()l{lDA ('ot \ r\'oF (-( )t.l_tER sl REEToR P.0. BO\ Cunrnting. CA 30040 l-lrc ti ng irtstrunrent \r'es s$l)rn ln anri subs..ribed belbrre mc tlri\Itr rlar b,r Iol0. nv knr or rvhr.r produccd_ as idenrification rnd uhtr did Jid n()t tukc an oath ( ll\.S1.\l't:./lP \'lr Contmission Lxpircs: (Stamp rrith :crial lrurrrtrer) ."*$i,uf% -: ,' ExPlREs " --- = iCNORGIA: = 'ar,rttfNRev 3/4/2015 S ,rt'\tttun [)uhlic 3.C.i Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Attachment H - Property Hearing Signs (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) srl PUBLIC HEANIilG ilOTICE KAPOK ST. VAHIANCE PETlil0N N0. VA-P1201900 02701 , HEX: N0VEMBER 12, 2020 r 9:00 A.M. COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MAilAGEMEIIIT DEPARTMEilT 28OO HORSESHOE DBIVE NOHTH R00lul 609-6t0, NAPLES, FL, 34104 TIM0THY FlNtll: 239-252'4312 . h- ,{_ T t,t I \t'i \l'at \,/ 1}_ tr+ :: 'a\t 'l \l I I J t, \) ,.\t ,tt I I I \\I /=: I ,,, t\ ) I ,l \ 1) i rl \ \ Itrl ,l 1' i,, I t\ ,\{I +t I l. \\ \,\'/ I !.'+ I I n ,1 tf 3.C.i Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: Attachment H - Property Hearing Signs (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 3.C.j Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: Attachment I - Hybrid Hearing Waiver (13713 : PL20190002701 Kapok St. Cell Tower) 11/12/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.D Item Summary: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20200001265 – Addison Commercial Corner, LLC requests an insubstantial change to the Addies Corner MPUD, Ordinance No. 11-08, for a sign deviation from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.4. to allow a maximum of two (2) wall signs for end units within shopping centers and multiple-occupancy parcels , or single occupancy parcels where there is double frontage on a public right-of-way, to allow Parcel 1 two (2) additional wall signs for a total of four (4) wall signs, and Parcel 3 one (1) additional wall sign for a total of three (3) wall signs. This deviation only applies to Tract A of the MPUD as shown on Exhibit C-1.The subject property consists of 4.44 acres, in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Principal Planner] Commissioner District 3 Meeting Date: 11/12/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Tim Finn 10/26/2020 2:42 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 10/26/2020 2:42 PM Approved By: Review: Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 10/29/2020 2:59 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Rose Burke Review Item Completed 10/29/2020 6:12 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 10/30/2020 1:35 PM Zoning Anita Jenkins Review Item Completed 11/02/2020 9:47 AM Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 11/12/2020 9:00 AM 3.D Packet Pg. 599 PDI-PL20200001265, Addie’s Corner Last revised: 10/28/20 Page 1 of 8 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 11/12/20 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 12, 2020 SUBJECT: PDI-PL20200001265, ADDIES CORNER APPLICANT/AGENT: Applicant: Agent: Addison Commercial Corner, LLC Lindsay F. Robin, MPA fka WMG Development, LLC Waldrop Engineering, P.A. 1200 Network Center Drive, Suite 2 28100 Bonita Grande Dr. Effingham, IL 62401 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner consider an insubstantial change to the Addies Corner MPUD, Ordinance No. 11-08, for a sign deviation from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.4 to allow a maximum of two (2) wall signs for end units within shopping centers and multiple-occupancy parcels, or single occupancy parcels where there is double frontage on a public right-of-way, to allow Parcel 1 two (2) additional wall signs for a total of four (4) wall signs, and Parcel 3 one (1) additional wall sign for a total of three (3) wall signs. This deviation only applies to Tract A of the MPUD as shown on Exhibit C-1. (See page 4 of staff report and Attachment C – Sign Wall Location) GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consists of 4.44 acres, in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida (See Location Map on the following page.) 3.D.a Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Staff Report - Addies Corner PDI (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) PDI-PL20200001265, Addie’s Corner Last revised: 10/28/20 Page 2 of 8 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 11/12/20 3.D.aPacket Pg. 601Attachment: Staff Report - Addies Corner PDI (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) PDI-PL20200001265, Addie’s Corner Last revised: 10/28/20 Page 3 of 8 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 11/12/20 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The property was originally rezoned in 2011 from Rural Agricultural (A) to Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) pursuant to Ordinance 2011-08 to allow for development of up to 135,000 sq. ft. of commercial development and/or a retirement community/group housing at an FAR of .60 and/or a hotel/motel at an intensity of 26 units per acre. In 2017, the MPUD was amended pursuant to Ordinance 2017-28 to allow for 250 multi-family dwelling units or group housing/retirement community uses in Tract C, and 75,000 sq. ft. of commercial and group housing/retirement community uses in Tract A. Tract A is undeveloped and proposed for commercial uses including a 5,190 sq. ft. Chick-fil-A with a drive-through, a 4,260 sq. ft. Heartland Dental, and a 19,209 sq. ft. Aldi grocery store with associated parking and site infrastructure per SDP-PL20190002580. Tract C of the MPUD is currently developed with multi-family apartments (Addison Place), and Tract B is the designated preserve area. Tract C and Tract A are transected by Addison Place Drive, a privately maintained right-of-way. While Tract A is adjacent to Immokalee Road, it is significantly separated from the arterial roadway frontage by the Cocohatchee Canal and existing sidewalk, with the total width ranging from 155 to 215 feet between the southern property line and the Immokalee Road right-of-way. The Applicant is requesting approval of an insubstantial change to the Addie’s Corner MPUD to amend Exhibit “E”, Deviations, approved per Ordinance 2017-28, to add a deviation to allow three (3) additional wall signs on Tract A only. (See Attachment A) The proposed deviation will allow Parcel 1 (Chick-fil-A) to have an additional two (2) wall signs for a total of four (4) wall signs (See Attachment D), and Parcel 3 (Aldi) to have one (1) additional wall sign for a total of three (3) wall signs (See Attachment E). Moreover, the applicant is requesting to amend the master plan reflecting the addition of deviation 6 (See Attachment B) and the addition of Exhibit C-1 that illustrates the locations and square footage of each proposed sign. (See Attachment C) LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties near the portion of the PUD affected by the request. North: Addison Place Drive (local road) then developed with multi-family residential units, with a current zoning designation of Addie’s Corner PUD (15.98 DU/AC) which is approved for multifamily residential, commercial, and group/retirement housing. East: Undeveloped land, with a current zoning designation of Tree Farm PUD (12.9 DU/AC) which is approved for residential and commercial uses South: Immokalee Road, a six-lane arterial roadway, and then undeveloped land with a current zoning designation of Richland PUD (3.1 DU/AC) which is approved for single and multi- family residential, community commercial, hotel/motel, stormwater management areas, open space and reserve areas. West: Addison Place Drive (local road) then developed with a lake with a current zoning designation of Esplanade Golf and Country Club of Naples RPUD (0.74 DU/AC) which is approved for single and multi-family residential. 3.D.a Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Staff Report - Addies Corner PDI (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) PDI-PL20200001265, Addie’s Corner Last revised: 10/28/20 Page 4 of 8 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 11/12/20 3.D.a Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Staff Report - Addies Corner PDI (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) PDI-PL20200001265, Addie’s Corner Last revised: 10/28/20 Page 5 of 8 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 11/12/20 STAFF ANALYSIS: Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the proposed changes to the PUD Document and found no issue with consistency. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Environmental staff has evaluated the proposed change to the PUD Document and found no issue with consistency. LDC Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 set forth the criteria by which insubstantial amendments to a PUD Master Plan and/or minor text changes to a PUD Document are to be reviewed before they can be approved. The criteria and a response to each have been listed as follows: LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1: a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)? No, there is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD. b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? No, there is no proposed increase in the number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development. c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development in excess of 5% of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five acres in area? No, there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size o f areas used for non-residential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? There would be no increase to the size of areas used for non-residential uses and no relocation of non-residential areas. e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities? No, there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment. f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? 3.D.a Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Staff Report - Addies Corner PDI (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) PDI-PL20200001265, Addie’s Corner Last revised: 10/28/20 Page 6 of 8 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 11/12/20 No, there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment. g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? No, the proposed changes will not impact or increase stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharge. h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? No. There will be no incompatible relationships with abutting land uses. i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? No. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the proposed changes to the PUD Document would be consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Both environmental and transportation planning staff have reviewed this petition, and no changes to the PUD Document are proposed that would be deemed inconsistent with the Conservation and Costal Management Element (CCME) or the Transportation Element of the GMP. This petition does not propose any increase in density or intensity of the permitted land uses. LDC Section 10.02.13.E.2: Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original application? No, the proposed change does not affect the original analysis and findings for the most recent zoning action in Petition PUDA-PL20150001776. An excerpt from the staff report prepared for that petition is attached as Attachment F. Attachment F contains the original analysis and findings from Petition PUDA-PL20150001776. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking one deviation from the requirements of the LDC. The petitioner’s rationale and staff analysis/recommendation is outlined below. Proposed Deviation #6 (Wall Signs) “Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.4., On-Premises Signs, which allows a maximum of two (2) wall signs for end units within shopping centers and multiple-occupancy parcels, or single occupancy parcels where there is double frontage on a public right-of-way, to allow Parcel 1 two (2) additional wall signs for a total of four (4) wall signs, and Parcel 3 one (1) additional wall sign 3.D.a Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: Staff Report - Addies Corner PDI (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) PDI-PL20200001265, Addie’s Corner Last revised: 10/28/20 Page 7 of 8 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 11/12/20 for a total of three (3) wall signs. This deviation only applies to Tract A of the MPUD as shown on Exhibit C-1.” Petitioner’s Justification: The requested deviation will allow for enhanced visibility of Chick-fil-A (Parcel #1), and Aldi (Parcel #3) businesses located within Tract A of the Addie’s Corner MPUD. The deviation requests additional wall signs, but the overall wall signage will not exceed the total allowable sign face area as permitted by the LDC. Tract A has multiple road frontages including Addison Place Drive and Immokalee Road, as well as areas of internal parking and drive aisles. The proposed Chick-fil-A and Aldi are a substantial distance from the travel lanes of Immokalee Road, which is separated from Tract A by an existing sidewalk and the 100-foot Collier County Cocohatchee canal. The separation from Tract A to Immokalee Road ranges in width from 150’ to 216’ and thus appropriate and visible signage is critical to the businesses, and to the safety of the traveling public. The additional wall signs will assist the traveling public in locating their destination safely and without causing unsafe driving conditions while traveling internal to the PUD and along external rights-of-way. Directly north of Addison Place Drive, also within the boundary of the MPUD, are existing multi - family apartments. The additional signage will assist those residents and their guests traveling along Addison Place Drive in navigating these businesses. The additional signs will not create a negative visual impact due to the intervening landscaping on Tract C, and the 10’ Type D landscape buffer provided on Tract A along Addison Place Drive. In addition to the landscaping, the wall signs will not exceed the allowable sign area. The Tree Farm MPUD directly to the east of Tract A is also intended to develop with commercial to the south and to the north of Addison Place Drive therefore these additional wall signs will help identify businesses amongst the larger commercial node at the Immokalee Road/Collier Blvd. intersection. This area is commercial in nature and will not be negatively impacted by additional wall signs, which are screened from the Tree Farm MPUD by a separating landscape buffer and internal driveways. Based on the surrounding land use pattern, frontage on multiple roadways and internal parking areas, and physical separation from Immokalee Road, the additional wall signs are necessary in order to enhance visibility and awareness of the businesses. The additional wall signs will serve to facilitate uninterrupted driving from vehicles passing by on Addison Place Drive or Immokalee Road. The wall signs will allow for additional visibility which assists the traveling public in determining destinations without impeding traffic flow and causing unsafe driving conditions. The two (2) wall sign limitation in this case is onerous and limiting considering the multiple frontages of Tract A and the separat ion from Immokalee Road. The Tract A signage will comply with the LDC in regards to all other signage requirements. For these reasons, the Applicant respectfully requests approval of this deviation. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community,” and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” 3.D.a Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: Staff Report - Addies Corner PDI (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) PDI-PL20200001265, Addie’s Corner Last revised: 10/28/20 Page 8 of 8 Hearing Examiner (HEX) Date: 11/12/20 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): NIM was waived via email correspondence from HEX Examiner Andrew Dickman on September 28, 2020. (See Attachment G) COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report on October 28, 2020 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve Petition PDI-PL20200001265. Attachments: A) Proposed Deviation 6 – PUD Document, Exhibit E B) Updated MPUD Master Plan C) Exhibit C-1 Wall Sign Location D) Chick-fil-A Wall Signage E) Aldi Wall Signage F) Findings of Fact G) NIM Waiver H) HEX Hybrid Meeting Waiver I) Application-Backup Materials J) Property Hearing Signs 3.D.a Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: Staff Report - Addies Corner PDI (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) Addie’s Corner MPUD – PL20200001265 Last Revised: September 2, 2020 Page 1 of 1 Underline Text is Added Strike-through Text is Deleted EXHIBIT “E” LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC ADDIE’S CORNER MPUD * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 6. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.4., On-Premises Signs, which allows a maximum of two (2) wall signs for end units within shopping centers and multiple-occupancy parcels , or single occupancy parcels where there is double frontage on a public right-of-way , to allow Parcel 1 two (2) additional wall signs for a total of four (4) wall signs, and Parcel 3 one (1) additional wall sign for a total of three (3) wall signs. This deviation only applies to Tract A of the MPUD as shown on Exhibit C-1. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 3.D.b Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Deviation 6 - PUD DOC, Exhibit E (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 6 m crod coozroU9 S RTsmoorno,( sccwmuazlO one avow slow- mov oxwrme- roue\ 0433* a sJw\ 3nm \\ 1 Bg I S N 8: 8111 0 1 I Iao8 J PLATEAU ROAD COLLIER FUTURE COLLIER BOULEVARD EXTENSION BOULEVARD a I UJU w Ja U H LIJ I DmD UdO QOm Q CDSUXv w w wl a 0 2CC Wti LLww O H 3 ZCI E0 LLLL g F- LL g I w CO CL Lu FFJ ill 00U b± I dE= t F, 3g I Ili O0 al Z Ilwm - w 4p z ti www JW ZZ g IliCL a I Q 1' s 217 a a0CC < r cDo r O wwa ao 1 m _. 1 D I Q a¢ 0 © p o r pp a IZ ' 5. 3X U 3 ---- y II 0 N g F 3 m 3ew zp a Q , w I a I z a I Ud U = 1 I- 0 I 0 I 2 Z FCD L ,, Qix Z 0I I x UW I FQ W ` ry`' I Ce I Wo I z ° a F CC w m > w 2 I e/ Q 7; W I UW O II xo y 0LL aw V- d lli I I o I o _ E a AJJN3Wy ` 4 _ I i c7 m wQ J a N e 69 z m ma mx zu_ E mw za s I uu) i w ° aJ Ww a low LLm00 w Ill I 0z g LLI Qz0 F R 1- m CL o_, 0_ r_ , Z }- m `) tea I Zuc uJ W W W WWHCO Ur UCZ W W W W LU v, v l LLF- 0 0 low -< W w W yCn W ctU 0 a low 1 gJF- LL 0a 0a 0CCwo a iw. w w0jZW v v ¢ zzaw v I , axo W 0LLce i u) ° 0 v0 5DZIX c)) 0 I N CO 0UEE U p cn Z ' Z m 0 y 0 Cs,x Z W U w 4 Xg g Xg W og \ ! r i"'- 00 Care''''' M 8' 8' 8' 8 S D• Cl) u) N J U Cn U W O F- W a' Z N Cn Z 3: w7474 0.' Q' in a F= U 0 F < -' I-- I--- Z W aw03030 0^— U N Q 1= Z a Z w a U LL m aa iia x o Z a . QX 0 ZLU QCC a LLI Q 0LLaJ ' Z Jo Z in ' e_.--, LL. I 0Z L m- z a' Z ( nLIJ U a W F- F > Z J a p Q1QQ' m g COva cnw- ax owN o ww Cn FOZUW) . W, oF- NW00 cavi so4 g W wU o a aHWWm x guj FJ Z b a n-. V)( nW O0UUww W JZZ Za tiF- OW U JO CL UJ U a1- 0UU r WLuOW = OaW. Z 1 NZQF CO U' IU F- N + IUUaa 2 Wce cc ce 0u) LL O JLL — Ww0 WEU Q 0< Z00M a 0 0 U UWU NI J a O Cha _ U W w U W FLI ( n Ia + I W O4 F, ii Wr 2aa Q> a N( aJ 0<- r2 W W 0 FQ tea' Z _, I112 a C.) x Mp COMW.-. LLMON LL LoI-- M MaLL, ILL d "- U Z W C) O d '' 0 CO F- N.• - N FFO^ FV 2ON WMZM X000 OO _ ZW aF- OMWFa- I-- CnZx W n' F U u W F J az Liia gat~ i can Z w gNFF-- Z oo w aQ2 co a W rgw z , LU a• aa Ot'~ ROZ ¢ CO J0aj MM CnOfYQIW- OZ W > UwrijU 0 0 a avw OJ aW F- WWa - Z4- z F W Q wS QZa tZQ ixZ a- w low z x0 0wOw QF- aa2QQ >¢ apoQap j z 2 1= 0a F- Cn0aja"` wa J _ _ w Cl. aCC0 JU VUXU> UU vz O w O H_ wOW1- 2 ca a2DW m> > Up x » a , ZaX -` Ww0P0 = O U co cn JCn 0xgzu) WLL UQa0 c) OW d' UW ce ZOW Cr LU xnOJtLOda' ZOXUz .- U w ° mow w O QI 500x grt a < ec 0 m- 1- 1- 1 F- cnaaa2aa _ 1waa > a '+' f 0 a z ce 0 a a> m F- F- I- 0 Z N ri 3.D.c Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: Attachment B - Updated MPUD Master Plan (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) TRACT A IMMOKALEE RD 5,190 SF19,209 SF ADDISON PLACE DRIVE 100' WIDE COLLIER COUNTY CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING SIDEWALK ADDISON PLACE DRIVEWALL SIGN: 37.71 SF WALL SIGN: 37.71 SF WALL SIGN: 36 SF WALL SIGN: 36 SF WALL SIGN: 74.9 SF WALL SIGN: 135.7 SF WALL SIGN: 74.9 SF HEARTLAND DENTAL NO DEVIATION REQUESTED PARCEL #1 PARCEL #2 PARCEL #3 B:\Projects\1159-001 (Addies Corner) PDI Proposal\Drawings-Exhibits\1159-001-E01 Aerial Sign Location Map\Current Plans\1159001E0102.dwgNORTH SCALE: 1" = 100' SET NUMBER: 1159-001 SHEET :1PLAN REVISIONSFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636ADDIE'S CORNER MPUDWALL SIGN AERIAL LOCATION EXHIBITWALDROPENGINEERING28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.comCIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS09/02/2020REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS1EXHIBIT C-13.D.d Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: Attachment C - Exhibit C-1 Wall Sign Location (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner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· $ · 0 ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ 4W\ 6LJQ$UHD $OORZHG $ 0DLQ,'6LJQ    % :DOO6LJQ,FRQ   & :DOO6LJQ6FULSW VHW   ' :DOO6LJQ6FULSW VHW   ( :DOO6LJQ6FULSW VHW   ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ 4W\ . '27+DQGLFDSSHG3DUNLQJ  . '27+DQGLFDSSHG3DUNLQJ 9DQ  / '273HGHVWULDQ6LJQ  0'276WRS  1 '276WRS'R1RW(QWHU  2'27'R1RW(QWHU  33 '27&XUEVLGH'HOLYHU\  + 0HQX%RDUG /DQH  + 0HQX%RDUG /DQH  &% &OHDUDQFH%DU  )3 )ODJSROH  +LJK:LQG  /96KXWWHUV WRWDORIVL]HV  3.D.e Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: Attachment D - Chick-fil-A Wall Signage (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) (/(9$7,216 %8,/',1* (/(9$7,216 1RUWK/DNH'ULYH /DNH&LW\*$  ZZZFOD\WRQVLJQVFRP6 ,1&1 ( (/(9$7,216 6&$/(µ   648$5()((7%·µ·µ·µ·µ(4(4(4(4 (4(4 ·µ·µ ·µ·µ ·µ·µ (4(4 (4(4 (4(4 (4(4 (4(4 (4(4·µ·µ·µ·µ·µ·µ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·µ·µ ·µ·µ (4(4 (4(4 (4(4 (4(4 ·µ·µ·µ·µ (4(4 (4(4 648$5()((7' (OHYDWLRQ :LGWK IHHW :LGWK LQFKHV +HLJKW IHHW +HLJKW LQFKHV $UHD 64)7 0XOWLSOLHU $UHD$OORZHG 6,*1%       6,*1&       6,*1'       6,*1(       3.D.e Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: Attachment D - Chick-fil-A Wall Signage (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) /2&$7,211RUWK/DNH'ULYH /DNH&LW\*$  ZZZFOD\WRQVLJQVFRP6 ,1&1 ( :$//6,*1 % 648$5()((7 (/(9$7,21 6&$/(µ   )$&(6 0&$5',1$/ 5('75$16/8&(179,1</ &$%,1(7 *(1(6,606,1*/(67$*( *6(5,(6 5(' 03$12*5$3+,&,,,)/(;)$&( 63(&,),&$7,216 &$%,1(7 $/80,180&$%,1(7+$6(;758'('$/80,180 )$&(6 )/(;)$&(6'(&25$7(':,7+75$16/8&(179,1</ ),/021685)$&(2)$&5</,& ,17(51$//<,//80,1$7(':,7+:+,7(/('./,*+76 ',6&211(&76:,7&+$65(48,5('3(51(& ·µ·µ(1'9,(: 6&$/(µ   µ63$&(5 µ67$,1/(66 67((//$*%2/7,172%/2&.,1* 6,*1 &$%,1(7 :$//6+($7+,1* $036:,7&+',6&211(&7 ·µ ·µ [µ:22'%/2&.,1* )2502817,1*2)6,*1 [µ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e Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: Attachment D - Chick-fil-A Wall Signage (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) /2&$7,211RUWK/DNH'ULYH /DNH&LW\*$  ZZZFOD\WRQVLJQVFRP6 ,1&1 ( /(',//80,1$7(' &+$11(//(77(56 &'( 648$5()((7        &+$11(//(77(5)$&(6 5('$&5</,& 75,0&$35(7$,1(5 µ5('-(:(/,7(75,0&$3 63(&,),&$7,216 &+,&.),/$6&5,37/(77(56 /(77(56$5(/(',//80,1$7(' &+$11(//(77(5602817(' 21$/80,180685)$&(2)%8,/',1* :,7+75$16)250(565(027(/< /2&$7('%(+,1'7+(:$//,1 8/$33529('75$16)250(5%2;(6 )$&(6$5(µ$&5</,& 5(78516$5($/80,180 %$&.6$5($/80,180 $//5(78516$5($5&:(/'('72 /(77(5%$&.6 $/80,1805(78516 3$,17('720$7&+ 6+(5:,1:,//,$06 6:/$77( 7+,66,*1,6,7(1'('72%(,167$//(',1$&&25'$1&(:,7+5(48,5(0(1762)$57,&/(2)7+(1$7,21$/ (/(&75,&$/&2'($1'25$33/,&$%/(/2&$/&2'(67+,6,1&/8'(63523(5*5281',1* %21',1*2)7+(6,*1 (/(9$7,21 6&$/(µ   µ63$&(5 /(77(5 5(7851 0$6215<:$// 6&5(:,1 )/(;&211(&725 $0372**/( 6:,7&+',6&211(&7 /('02'8/(6 /('32:(56833/< ,16,'(2)75$16)250(5%2; &52666(&7,21 6&$/(µ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e Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: Attachment D - Chick-fil-A Wall Signage (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 18'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY28'-10" A.F.F.T.O. STEEL0'-0"FIN. FLOOR3'-8" A.F.F.T.O. W.T.11'-4" A.F.F.B.O. CANOPY EQEQ9'-6" SIGN OPNG.7'-11 5/8"SIGN OPNG.5544447722GRADE LINE663321'-0 1/8" A.F.F.CENTER OF LOGO SIGNS111322'-0" A.F.F.T.O. STUD0'-0"FIN. FLOOR3'-8" A.F.F.T.O. W.T.433'-4"Longest distance between 4'-0" min. projections - 94'-6"322EQEQ0'-0"FIN. FLOOR28'-10" A.F.F.T.O. STEEL11'-4" A.F.F.B.O. CANOPY FINISH22'-0" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY49'-6" SIGN OPNG.3'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY55422'-1 1/2" A.F.F.T.O. STEEL20'-0" A.F.F.T.O. STUD7'-11 5/8"SIGN OPNG.72GRADE LINE6346TYP.14312170'-0"FIN. FLOOR3'-8" A.F.F.T.O. W.T.3'-4"Longest distance between 4'-0" min. projections - 73'-8 1/2"32SIGNAGEDESCRIPTIONQUANTITYSQ. FT. PER SIGNTOTALSTOWER SIGN (PRIMARY)274.9149.8TENANT PANEL (ANCILLARY)1135.7135.7TOTAL SIGNAGE149.8SIGNAGE IS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND SHALL BE UNDER SEPARATEPERMIT SUBMITTAL18'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY0'-0"FIN. FLOOR28'-10" A.F.F.T.O. STEEL3GRADE LINE1654156127471422'-0" A.F.F.T.O. STUD22'-0" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY22'-0" A.F.F.T.O. STUD0'-0"FIN. FLOOR3'-8" A.F.F.T.O. W.T.3'-8" A.F.F.T.O. W.T.43'-4" 3'-4"Longest distance between 4'-0" min. projections - 99'-10 1/2"43221GREEN SCREEN WELDEDWIRE TRELLIS SYSTEMGREEN SCREEN WELDEDWIRE TRELLIS SYSTEM110'-0"FIN. FLOOR22'-0" A.F.F.T.O. STUD41GRADE LINE1635645225772413'-8" A.F.F.T.O. W.T.22'-0" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY0'-0"FIN. FLOOR3'-8" A.F.F.T.O. W.T.18'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY3EQEQ2'-0"Longest distance between 4'-0" min. projections - 96'-6 3/4"3'-4" 3'-4"234GREEN SCREEN WELDEDWIRE TRELLIS SYSTEM1ECHELON - JARED TANQUIK-BRIKBUILDING WALL FIELD , CART WALL2BORAL - CHARDONNAY / COBBLEFIELDTHIN STONE VENEERBUILDING WATERTABLE3NICHIHA - BARK (VINTAGE WOOD)FIBER CEMENT BOARDBUMP-OUTS5FIRESTONE - SILVER METALLICMETAL TRIMEDGE METAL6LAMINATORS INC -BRIGHT SILVERALUMINUM COMPOSITE PANELSIGNAGE FIELD7DRYVIT - MONASTERY BROWNE.I.F.S.BUILDING CORNICE4CUSTOM COLOR - AGED BRONZEMETAL TRIMEDGE METALDrawing No.Scale:Project No.Type:Date:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Issued for Site Plan Approval04/29/20Inc.(561) 640-8000(561) 640-8001 fax1171 North State Road 7Royal Palm Beach, FL 33411PLOTTED: 7/9/2020 4:47 PM Date:AIssued:PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEERDATEPROJECT LEADDATESealSealDATEPROJECT DESIGNER1Date:Revisions:BCDE23456789585.742.2222585.924.4914.fax615 Fishers RunVictor, NY 14564615 Fishers Run Victor, NY 14564585.742.2222 - www.apd.comDrawing AlterationIt is a violation of law for any person, unless acting under thedirection of licensed Architect, Professional Engineer, LandscapeArchitect, or Land Surveyor to alter any item on this document in anyway. Any licensee who alters this document is required by law to affixhis or her seal and to add the notation "Altered By" followed by his orher signature and the specific description of the alteration or revision.APD Engineering & Architecture, PLLCwww.apd.comCCopyright 2020Copying, Printing, Software and other processes required to producethese prints can stretch or shrink the actual paper or layout.Therefore, scaling of this drawing may be inaccurate. Contact APDE&A with any need for additional dimensions or clarifications.DO NOT SCALE PLANSStore #:20-0309AALDI Inc.Naples, FLAddison Place DriveNaples, FL 34119Palm Beach County04/02/20RHRDV7ERAs Noted24ExteriorElevationsCBCEE-2Revised per Review Comments07/10/201East ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2South ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3West ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"4North ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"NORTH ELEVATIOND.2.b features included (2 minimum required):·Item vii: Tower element and 15% glazing at the facade (15% glazing provided)·Item v: Trellis / latticework covering minimum of 15% of the facade (18% provided)D.4.a.iii requires 4' projection / recess in facade every 100' max.D.5 treatments included (4 minimum required):·item e: corniceitem i: ornamental & structural architectural details (bump-out)·item l: building baseitem p: pilastersD.8.a - screen wall for OHD complies with option iD.9.b.i requires all facades to be primary facades because project located in PUDD.10.a requires parapet line changes every 100' max. with height of 3' min.WEST ELEVATIOND.2.b features included (2 minimum required):·Item i.a: Glazing covering a minimum of 25% of the facade.Trellis / latticework may count for up to 50% of the window area.(16% glazing and 9% trellis provided = 25%)·Item vii: Tower element and 15% glazing at the facade (16% glazing provided)D.4.a.iii requires 4' projection / recess in facade every 100' max.D.5 treatments included (4 minimum required):·item e: corniceitem i: ornamental & structural architectural details (bump-out)·item l: building baseitem p: pilastersD.9.b.i requires all facades to be primary facades because project located in PUDD.10.a requires parapet line changes every 100' max. with height of 3' min.SOUTH ELEVATIOND.2.b features included (2 minimum required):·Item ii: Projected / recessed entry, 100 sqft min.·Item vii: Tower element and 15% glazing at the facade (19% glazing provided)D.4.a.iii requires 4' projection / recess in facade every 100' max.D.5 treatments included (4 minimum required):·item e: corniceitem j: roof treatment·item k: covered entryitem l: building baseitem p: pilastersD.9.b.i requires all facades to be primary facades because project located in PUDD.10.a requires parapet line changes every 100' max. with height of 3' min.EAST ELEVATIOND.2.b features included (2 minimum required):·Item ii: Projected / recessed entry, 100 sqft min.·Item vii: Tower element and 15% glazing at the facade (28% glazing provided)D.4.a.iii requires 4' projection / recess in facade every 100' max.D.5 treatments included (4 minimum required):·item e: cornicetem j: roof treatment·item k: covered entryitem l: building baseD.9.b.i requires all facades to be primary facades because project located in PUDD.10.a requires parapet line changes every 100' max. with height of 3' min.Smooth conc block is limited to 33% of the facade area: Elevations show 20%3.D.fPacket Pg. 615Attachment: Attachment E - Aldi Wall Signage (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08”: 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The subject site fronts on Immokalee Road. Water and wastewater transmission mains are readily available within the Immokalee Road right-of-way, and there is adequate water and wastewater treatment capacity to serve the proposed MPUD. The south property line of the development abuts the Cocohatchee River Canal which conveys stormwater from the site. The Cocohatchee River Canal Basin will have the drainage concurrency needed to prevent adverse impacts, provided the development maintains a discharge rate of 0.04 cubic feet per second per acre. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any p roposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report (or within an accompanying memorandum). 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Analysis section of this staff report, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The MPUD is required to provide at least 30% of the gross area for usable open space. No deviation from the open space requirement is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or PPL. 3.D.g Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: Attachment F - Findings of Fact (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time, a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including Collier County Water-Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will continuously be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. This MPUD was approved with two deviations pursuant to Ordinance 2011-08, and the petitioner is now seeking four new deviations, requiring an evaluation to the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this MPUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. Each new deviation requested by the petitioner is itemized and analyzed in the Deviation Discussion section of this staff report on page 13. Staff is supportive of all deviations, because it is the opinion of staff that the petitioner has demonstrated that “the elements may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community” in accordance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3 and that the petitioner has demonstrated the deviations are “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations” in accordance with LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable”: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, 3.D.g Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: Attachment F - Findings of Fact (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is currently zoned MPUD and would remain as such. Staff responded to this criteria in the initial rezoning petition by stating the following: The proposed PUD rezone would not create an isolated zoning district because the abutting lands are also zoned PUD. Additionally, the project is required to provide a vehicular interconnection to the adjacent developments. No changes are proposed to the interconnections with this petition. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. This petition does not propose any change to the boundaries of the MPUD. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed MPUD is not anticipated to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has sufficient capacity to serve the proposed project at this time. The project is subject to the Transportation Commitments contained in the PUD Ordinance. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUDA request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area, provided the project’s stormwater management system is designed to the current 3.D.g Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: Attachment F - Findings of Fact (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) Cocohatchee River Canal Basin discharge rate of 0.04 cubic foot per second per acre. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage on this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County staff will evaluate the project’s stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at time of SDP and/or PPL. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated the changes proposed to this MPUD would reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The Tree Farm MPUD is currently vacant and staff does not anticipate this amendment serving as a deterrent to its improvement. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed design standards cannot be achieved without amending the MPUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff’s opinion the proposed uses and associated development standards and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 3.D.g Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: Attachment F - Findings of Fact (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD Document. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. The activity proposed by this amendment will have no impact on public facility adequacy in regard to utilities. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. 3.D.g Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: Attachment F - Findings of Fact (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) FinnTimothy From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Andrew Dickman < andrew@dickmanlawfirm.org > Monday, September 28, 2020 2:43 PM Lindsay Robin FinnTimothy; FrantzJeremy; Heather Addie's Corner PDI (P120200001255) - NIM Waiver Request/GRANTED EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email ls from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Ms. Robin: I have reviewed your request and I have been informed by county staff that the first set of staff review comments have been issued. lf this is not correct, please let me know immediately. Based on the above information, your NIM waiver request is GRANTED, with one condition. lf any opposition to your application occurs between the granting of this waiver and the public hearing, I reserve the right to reschedule the hearing and require the holding of a NlM. Sincerely, Andrew Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP Collier County Hearing Examiner (239) 434-0840 httos://www.colliercountvfl.eov/vour-go vernment/divisions-f-r/hearine-exa miner All government correspondence is subject to the public records low. From: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September L6,2O2O 7:49 PM To: Andrew Dickman <andrew@dickmanlawfirm.org> cc: Lindsay Robin <Lindsay.Robin@waldropengineering.com> Subject: Addie's Corner PDI (P120200001265) - NIM Waiver Request Hi Andrew, See below correspondence from the agent on the NIM waiver request. Attached please review documentation associated with this Petition. From: Lindsay Robin <Lindsav Robin@waldroDensineerins.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 1:55 PM 1 You have requested a waiver of the neighborhood information meeting (NlM) in connection with the above referenced application. PursuanttoSec. 10.03.05(HX2Xa) of the Collier County land development code, a N lM is required for your application except "upon written request by the applicant, the Hearing Examiner has the discretion to waive the NIM after the first set of staff review comments have been issued." 3.D.h Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: Attachment G - NIM Waiver (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) To: Fi n nTi mothy <Ti mothv. Fi n n @co I liercou ntvfl.gov> Cc: Alexis Crespo <Alexis.Crespo@waldropengineering.com>; 'Darenda Marvin' <dmarvin@wmgdevelopment.com> Subject: Addie's Corner MPUD PDI - NIM Waiver Request EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Tim - Please accept this email as a request to waive the Neighborhood lnformation Meeting (NlM) for the Addie's Corner MPUD PDI application (P120200001265). The PDI request is limited to three (3) additionalwall signs on two (2) separate outparcels within the MPUD. The request will not result in any external impacts that would warrant a NlM. The additional signs are located internal to the MPUD on Tract A and willface roadways/parcels that are entirely within the limits of MPUD boundary. The signs will not exceed the total square footage of signage allowed per parcel, which is also indicative of a lack of external impact. Tract A has multiple road frontages including Addison Place Drive and lmmokalee Road, as well as areas of internal parking and drive aisles and therefore the additional wall signs are necessary in order to enhance visibility and awareness of the businesses. The request is minor in nature and will create safer driving conditions for the traveling public. Due to the lack of external impact, the Applicant respectfully requests approval of a NIM waiver Thank you, Lindsay F. Robin rvrpn Project Manager GINEERTNG PIr'JNIITG Cff'tEHGIT'E€TIH$ I.AHO€'AFI ARCXIIECIT,,8E lindsay.robin@waldropengineering.com I waldropengineering.com o (239) 405-7777 | d (239) 908-3079 | c (561 ) 704-7633 BONTTA SPRTNGS I FORT MYERS IORLANDO ISARASOTA ITAMPA 28'100 Bonita Grande Drive, Suite 305, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. lf you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. lnstead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. P.A. for any defects or errors rn this file/data. WALDROP 2 3.D.h Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: Attachment G - NIM Waiver (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.i Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: Attachment H - HEX Hybrid Meeting Waiver (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 1 of 4 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PUD (PDI) LDC subsection 10.02.13 E & Code of Laws section 2-83 – 2-90 Ch. 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner’s approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application . PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): ______________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: __________________________________________ Address: __________________________City: _____________ State: _______ ZIP: __________ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ___________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ________________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: ______________________City: _______________ State: _________ ZIP: __________ Telephone: _____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: _________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ DETAIL OF REQUEST On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. To be completed by staff 3.D.j Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 2 of 4 PROPERTY INFORMATION PUD NAME: _______________________ ORDINANCE NUMBER: ________________________ FOLIO NUMBER(S): _____________________________________________________________ Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? Yes No If no, please explain: _______________________________________________________ Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? Yes No If yes, in whose name? _____________________________________________________ Has any portion of the PUD been SOLD and/or DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? Yes No If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. 3.D.j Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 3 of 4 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Insubstantial Change Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 Pre-Application Meeting notes 1 Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes and why amendment is necessary 1 Detail of request 1 Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy 1 Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy 1 Revised Text and any exhibits PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance # Warranty Deed Legal Description 1 Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended If PUD is platted, include plat book pages List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Copy of 8 ½ in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 3.D.j Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) Addie’s Corner MPUD - PDI PL20200001265 Cover Letter/Request Narrative Page 1 of 4 July 28, 2020 Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP Principal Planner Zoning & Land Development Review Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Addie’s Corner MPUD Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI) - PL20200001265 Dear Mr. Finn: Enclosed for your review is an application for an Insubstantial Change to a PUD in regards to the Addie’s Corner MPUD (Mixed Use Planned Development), a 23.3+/- acre project located at the northwest quadrant of Immokalee Road and Collier Blvd. in northern unincorporated Collier County. The Applicant is requesting to add one (1) deviation to allow for three (3) additional wall signs for the commercial tract (Tract A) of the MPUD, adjacent to Immokalee Road. The deviation will apply to Tract A of the MPUD only. BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS The Property was originally rezoned in 2011 from Rural Agricultural (A) to Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) pursuant to Ordinance 2011-08 to allow for development of up to 135,000 sq. ft. of commercial development and/or a retirement community/group housing at an FAR of .60 and/or a hotel/motel at an intensity of 26 units per acre. In 2017, the MPUD was amended pursuant to Ordinance 17-28 to allow for 250 multi-family dwelling units or group housing/retirement community uses in Tract C, and 75,000 sq. ft. of commercial and group housing/retirement community uses in Tract A. Tract A is undeveloped and proposed for commercial uses including a 5,190 sq. ft. Chick-fil-A with a drive-through, a 4,260 sq. ft. Heartland Dental, and a 19,209 sq. ft. Aldi grocery store with associated parking and site infrastructure per SDP-PL20190002580. Tract C of the MPUD is currently developed with multi-family apartments (Addison Place), and Tract B is the designated preserve area. Tract C and Commercial Tract A are transected by Addison Place Drive, a privately maintained right-of-way. While Tract A is adjacent to Immokalee Road, it is significantly separated from the arterial roadway frontage by the Cocohatchee Canal and existing sidewalk, with the total width ranging from 155 to 215 feet between the southern property line and the Immokalee Road right-of-way. REQUEST The Applicant is requesting approval of an insubstantial change to the Addie’s Corner MPUD to amend Exhibit “E”, Deviations, approved per Ordinance 2017-28 to add a deviation to allow three (3) additional wall signs on Tract A only. The proposed deviation will allow the Chick-fil-A restaurant to have an additional two (2) wall signs for a total of four (4) wall signs, and Aldi to have one (1) additional wall sign for a total of three (3) wall signs. 3.D.j Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) Addie’s Corner MPUD - PDI PL20200001265 Cover Letter/Request Narrative Page 2 of 4 The LDC currently permits each business a total of two (2) wall signs. Heartland Dental is not seeking any additional wall signs, and the deviation would only apply to Tract A of the MPUD. In no case will more than one (1) sign be on each wall/facade. Based on the surrounding land use pattern, frontage on multiple roadways and internal parking areas, and physical separation from Immokalee Road, the additional wall signs are necessary in order to enhance visibility and awareness of the businesses. The additional wall signs will serve to facilitate uninterrupted driving from vehicles passing by on Addison Place Drive or Immokalee Road. The wall signs will allow for additional visibility which assists the traveling public in determining destinations without impeding traffic flow and causing unsafe driving conditions. The two (2) wall sign limitation in this case is onerous and limiting considering the multiple frontages of Tract A and the separation from Immokalee Road. No other changes are being requested through this application. The project will continue to provide the required buffers and preserve as outlined in the approved zoning ordinance. The proposed wall signs, as shown on the Proposed Wall Signs Aerial Location Exhibit, will comply with all other LDC requirements. From an internal compatibility standpoint, the three (3) additional wall signs will not negatively impact the multi-family located on Tract C, which is separated from Tract A by Addison Place Drive and intervening landscape buffering on both Tracts A and C. The wall signs will assist in wayfinding for the multi-family project, when vehicles, or pedestrians, are traveling east or west on Addison Place Drive. JUSTIFICATION/COMPLIANCE WITH LDC §10.02.13.E: The request complies with the thresholds for insubstantial changes to PUDs as outlined in LDC §10.02.13.E as follows: a. A proposed change in the boundary of the PUD; No, the request will not change the existing PUD boundary. b. A proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development; No, the request will not increase the approved density or intensity, or the height of proposed buildings. c. A proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or 5 acres in area; No, the request will not result in a decrease of preserve, conservation, recreation, or open space areas. d. A proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses; No, the request does not impact the size of non-residential areas, or propose to relocate such areas within the PUD boundary. 3.D.j Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) Addie’s Corner MPUD - PDI PL20200001265 Cover Letter/Request Narrative Page 3 of 4 e. A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities; No, the request will not result in an impact to the development in terms of traffic and public facilities. f. A change that will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; No, the request will not generate a higher level of vehicular traffic. No change in land use activities is being requested. g. A change that will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will otherwise increase stormwater discharges; No, the request will not result in increased requirements for stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharges. h. A change that will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use; No, the request will not negatively impact abutting land uses. The project will continue to provide the required buffers and preserve as outlined in the approved zoning ordinance. From an internal compatibility standpoint, the three (3) additional wall signs will not negatively impact the multi-family located on Tract C, which is separated from Tract A by landscaping, Addison Place Drive, and a 10’ Type D buffer on Tract A. Buffering will also be provided between Tract A and the future commercial development located to the east in the Tree Farm MPUD in accordance with the LDC. In addition to the landscaping, the wall signs will not exceed the allowable sign area. i. Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other element of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses; No, the request does not impact the project’s compliance with the Growth Management Plan. The request is limited to a total of three (3) additional wall signs on Tract A of the MPUD. j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. § 380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13; or No, the PUD is not within a DRI. 3.D.j Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) Addie’s Corner MPUD - PDI PL20200001265 Cover Letter/Request Narrative Page 4 of 4 k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13 No, the request is not a substantial modification to the PUD and may be processed as a PDI pursuant to the LDC and Administrative Code. CONCLUSION: In summary, the proposed Insubstantial Change will allow Tract A of the MPUD an additional three (3) wall signs: two (2) for Chick-fil-A and one (1) for Aldi in order to enhance visibility of both businesses. The MPUD will remain consistent with the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP); the change meets all criteria for review as an Insubstantial Change; and the request will not impact internal or external compatibility of the project. The following items are enclosed for your review: 1. One (1) copy of the Cover Letter/Project Narrative detailing the purpose of the request; 2. One (1) copy of the completed PDI Application; 3. One (1) copy of the Pre-Application Meeting Notes; 4. One (1) copy of the Current Master Plan; 5. One (1) copy of the Revised Exhibit E, Deviations; 6. One (1) copy of the Deviation Justification Narrative; 7. One (1) copy of the Proposed Wall Sign Aerial Location Exhibit; 8. One (1) copy of the Chick-fil-A Wall Sign Detail Package; 9. One (1) copy of the Aldi Wall Sign Detail Package; 10. One (1) copy of amended Title Page with Ordinance; 11. One (1) copy of the Recorded Warranty Deed; 12. One (1) copy of the Recorded Plat; 13. One (1) copy of the Affidavit of Authorization; 14. One (1) copy of the Evidence of Authority; 15. One (1) copy of the approved Addressing Checklist; 16. One (1) copy of the Property Ownership Disclosure Form; and 17. One (1) copy of the Location Map. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (239) 908-3079, or lindsay.robin@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. Lindsay F. Robin, MPA Project Planner Enclosures cc: Darenda Marvin, AICP, WMG Development 3.D.j Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 6 m crod coozroU9 S RTsmoorno,( sccwmuazlO one avow slow- mov oxwrme- roue\ 0433* a sJw\ 3nm \\ 1 Bg I S N 8: 8111 0 1 I Iao8 J PLATEAU ROAD COLLIER FUTURE COLLIER BOULEVARD EXTENSION BOULEVARD a I UJU w Ja U H LIJ I DmD UdO QOm Q CDSUXv w w wl a 0 2CC Wti LLww O H 3 ZCI E0 LLLL g F- LL g I w CO CL Lu FFJ ill 00U b± I dE= t F, 3g I Ili O0 al Z Ilwm - w 4p z ti www JW ZZ g IliCL a I Q 1' s 217 a a0CC < r cDo r O wwa ao 1 m _. 1 D I Q a¢ 0 © p o r pp a IZ ' 5. 3X U 3 ---- y II 0 N g F 3 m 3ew zp a Q , w I a I z a I Ud U = 1 I- 0 I 0 I 2 Z FCD L ,, Qix Z 0I I x UW I FQ W ` ry`' I Ce I Wo I z ° a F CC w m > w 2 I e/ Q 7; W I UW O II xo y 0LL aw V- d lli I I o I o _ E a AJJN3Wy ` 4 _ I i c7 m wQ J a N e 69 z m ma mx zu_ E mw za s I uu) i w ° aJ Ww a low LLm00 w Ill I 0z g LLI Qz0 F R 1- m CL o_, 0_ r_ , Z }- m `) tea I Zuc uJ W W W WWHCO Ur UCZ W W W W LU v, v l LLF- 0 0 low -< W w W yCn W ctU 0 a low 1 gJF- LL 0a 0a 0CCwo a iw. w w0jZW v v ¢ zzaw v I , axo W 0LLce i u) ° 0 v0 5DZIX c)) 0 I N CO 0UEE U p cn Z ' Z m 0 y 0 Cs,x Z W U w 4 Xg g Xg W og \ ! r i"'- 00 Care''''' M 8' 8' 8' 8 S D• Cl) u) N J U Cn U W O F- W a' Z N Cn Z 3: w7474 0.' Q' in a F= U 0 F < -' I-- I--- Z W aw03030 0^— U N Q 1= Z a Z w a U LL m aa iia x o Z a . QX 0 ZLU QCC a LLI Q 0LLaJ ' Z Jo Z in ' e_.--, LL. I 0Z L m- z a' Z ( nLIJ U a W F- F > Z J a p Q1QQ' m g COva cnw- ax owN o ww Cn FOZUW) . W, oF- NW00 cavi so4 g W wU o a aHWWm x guj FJ Z b a n-. V)( nW O0UUww W JZZ Za tiF- OW U JO CL UJ U a1- 0UU r WLuOW = OaW. Z 1 NZQF CO U' IU F- N + IUUaa 2 Wce cc ce 0u) LL O JLL — Ww0 WEU Q 0< Z00M a 0 0 U UWU NI J a O Cha _ U W w U W FLI ( n Ia + I W O4 F, ii Wr 2aa Q> a N( aJ 0<- r2 W W 0 FQ tea' Z _, I112 a C.) x Mp COMW.-. LLMON LL LoI-- M MaLL, ILL d "- U Z W C) O d '' 0 CO F- N.• - N FFO^ FV 2ON WMZM X000 OO _ ZW aF- OMWFa- I-- CnZx W n' F U u W F J az Liia gat~ i can Z w gNFF-- Z oo w aQ2 co a W rgw z , LU a• aa Ot'~ ROZ ¢ CO J0aj MM CnOfYQIW- OZ W > UwrijU 0 0 a avw OJ aW F- WWa - Z4- z F W Q wS QZa tZQ ixZ a- w low z x0 0wOw QF- aa2QQ >¢ apoQap j z 2 1= 0a F- Cn0aja"` wa J _ _ w Cl. aCC0 JU VUXU> UU vz O w O H_ wOW1- 2 ca a2DW m> > Up x » a , ZaX -` Ww0P0 = O U co cn JCn 0xgzu) WLL UQa0 c) OW d' UW ce ZOW Cr LU xnOJtLOda' ZOXUz .- U w ° mow w O QI 500x grt a < ec 0 m- 1- 1- 1 F- cnaaa2aa _ 1waa > a '+' f 0 a z ce 0 a a> m F- F- I- 0 Z N ri 3.D.j Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 6 m crod coozroU9 S RTsmoorno,( sccwmuazlO one avow slow- mov oxwrme- roue\ 0433* a sJw\ 3nm \\ 1 Bg I S N 8: 8111 0 1 I Iao8 J PLATEAU ROAD COLLIER FUTURE COLLIER BOULEVARD EXTENSION BOULEVARD a I UJU w Ja U H LIJ I DmD UdO QOm Q CDSUXv w w wl a 0 2CC Wti LLww O H 3 ZCI E0 LLLL g F- LL g I w CO CL Lu FFJ ill 00U b± I dE= t F, 3g I Ili O0 al Z Ilwm - w 4p z ti www JW ZZ g IliCL a I Q 1' s 217 a a0CC < r cDo r O wwa ao 1 m _. 1 D I Q a¢ 0 © p o r pp a IZ ' 5. 3X U 3 ---- y II 0 N g F 3 m 3ew zp a Q , w I a I z a I Ud U = 1 I- 0 I 0 I 2 Z FCD L ,, Qix Z 0I I x UW I FQ W ` ry`' I Ce I Wo I z ° a F CC w m > w 2 I e/ Q 7; W I UW O II xo y 0LL aw V- d lli I I o I o _ E a AJJN3Wy ` 4 _ I i c7 m wQ J a N e 69 z m ma mx zu_ E mw za s I uu) i w ° aJ Ww a low LLm00 w Ill I 0z g LLI Qz0 F R 1- m CL o_, 0_ r_ , Z }- m `) tea I Zuc uJ W W W WWHCO Ur UCZ W W W W LU v, v l LLF- 0 0 low -< W w W yCn W ctU 0 a low 1 gJF- LL 0a 0a 0CCwo a iw. w w0jZW v v ¢ zzaw v I , axo W 0LLce i u) ° 0 v0 5DZIX c)) 0 I N CO 0UEE U p cn Z ' Z m 0 y 0 Cs,x Z W U w 4 Xg g Xg W og \ ! r i"'- 00 Care''''' M 8' 8' 8' 8 S D• Cl) u) N J U Cn U W O F- W a' Z N Cn Z 3: w7474 0.' Q' in a F= U 0 F < -' I-- I--- Z W aw03030 0^— U N Q 1= Z a Z w a U LL m aa iia x o Z a . QX 0 ZLU QCC a LLI Q 0LLaJ ' Z Jo Z in ' e_.--, LL. I 0Z L m- z a' Z ( nLIJ U a W F- F > Z J a p Q1QQ' m g COva cnw- ax owN o ww Cn FOZUW) . W, oF- NW00 cavi so4 g W wU o a aHWWm x guj FJ Z b a n-. V)( nW O0UUww W JZZ Za tiF- OW U JO CL UJ U a1- 0UU r WLuOW = OaW. Z 1 NZQF CO U' IU F- N + IUUaa 2 Wce cc ce 0u) LL O JLL — Ww0 WEU Q 0< Z00M a 0 0 U UWU NI J a O Cha _ U W w U W FLI ( n Ia + I W O4 F, ii Wr 2aa Q> a N( aJ 0<- r2 W W 0 FQ tea' Z _, I112 a C.) x Mp COMW.-. LLMON LL LoI-- M MaLL, ILL d "- U Z W C) O d '' 0 CO F- N.• - N FFO^ FV 2ON WMZM X000 OO _ ZW aF- OMWFa- I-- CnZx W n' F U u W F J az Liia gat~ i can Z w gNFF-- Z oo w aQ2 co a W rgw z , LU a• aa Ot'~ ROZ ¢ CO J0aj MM CnOfYQIW- OZ W > UwrijU 0 0 a avw OJ aW F- WWa - Z4- z F W Q wS QZa tZQ ixZ a- w low z x0 0wOw QF- aa2QQ >¢ apoQap j z 2 1= 0a F- Cn0aja"` wa J _ _ w Cl. aCC0 JU VUXU> UU vz O w O H_ wOW1- 2 ca a2DW m> > Up x » a , ZaX -` Ww0P0 = O U co cn JCn 0xgzu) WLL UQa0 c) OW d' UW ce ZOW Cr LU xnOJtLOda' ZOXUz .- U w ° mow w O QI 500x grt a < ec 0 m- 1- 1- 1 F- cnaaa2aa _ 1waa > a '+' f 0 a z ce 0 a a> m F- F- I- 0 Z N ri 3.D.j Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 7/21/2020 Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=ADDISONCOM…1/2 Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Search by Entity Name / D C Florida Department of State 3.D.j Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 7/21/2020 Detail by Entity Name search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=ADDISONCOM…2/2 Document Number FEI/EIN Number Date Filed Effective Date State Status Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company ADDISON COMMERCIAL CORNER, LLC Filing Information L20000140370 NONE 05/22/2020 05/22/2020 FL ACTIVE Principal Address 1200 NETWORK CENTERE DRIVE SUITE 2 EFFINGHAM, IL 62401 Mailing Address PO BOX 768 EFFINGHAM, IL 62401 Registered Agent Name & Address CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY 1201 HAYS STREET TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301 Authorized Person(s) Detail Name & Address Title MGR BRUMLEVE, JONATHAN PO BOX 768 EFFINGHAM, IL 62401 Title MGR FROST, CURTIS PO BOX 768 EFFINGHAM, IL 62401 Annual Reports No Annual Reports Filed Document Images 05/22/2020 -- Florida Limited Liability View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations 3.D.j Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.j Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. F orms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) T DR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) 1 SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # ADDISON PLACE TRACT F 2006-AR-14425 3.D.j Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 2 Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) 21842600045 7/2/2020 3.D.j Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership 3.D.j Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: 3.D.j Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Date of option: _________________________ Date option terminates: __________________, or Anticipated closing date: ________________ AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 ____________________________________________ ____________ Agent/Owner Signature Date ____________________________________________ Agent/Owner Name (please print) as Manager of Addison Corner Commercial, LLC 3.D.j Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) EXHIBIT “A” Addison Commercial Corner, LLC NAME ADDRESS PERCENTAGE OF INTEREST Richard E. Workman 2001 Trust Richard E. Workman, Trustee 9800 Walzer Court Windermere, Florida 34786 33.33% Workman 2017 Irrevocable Trust f/b/o Jordan M. Workman Angela M. Workman, Trustee 9800 Walzer Court Windermere, Florida 34786 16.67% Workman 2017 Irrevocable Trust f/b/o Jared R. Workman Angela M. Workman, Trustee 9800 Walzer Court Windermere, Florida 34786 16.66% Workman 2017 Irrevocable Trust f/b/o Madison A. Workman Angela M. Workman, Trustee 9800 Walzer Court Windermere, Florida 34786 16.66% Workman 2017 Irrevocable Trust f/b/o Meredith A. Workman Angela M. Workman, Trustee 9800 Walzer Court Windermere, Florida 34786 16.66% 3.D.j Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) PROJECT BOUNDARYIMMOKALEE ROADCOLLIER BLVDESPLANADE BLVD ADDISON PLACE DR PEBBLEBROOKE DRNO SCALENORTH PROJECT LOCATION MAP 3.D.jPacket Pg. 662Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) TRACT A IMMOKALEE RD 5,190 SF19,209 SF ADDISON PLACE DRIVE 100' WIDE COLLIER COUNTY CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING SIDEWALK ADDISON PLACE DRIVEWALL SIGN: 37.71 SF WALL SIGN: 37.71 SF WALL SIGN: 36 SF WALL SIGN: 36 SF WALL SIGN: 74.9 SF WALL SIGN: 135.7 SF WALL SIGN: 74.9 SF HEARTLAND DENTAL NO DEVIATION REQUESTED PARCEL #1 PARCEL #2 PARCEL #3 B:\Projects\1159-001 (Addies Corner) PDI Proposal\Drawings-Exhibits\1159-001-E01 Aerial Sign Location Map\Current Plans\1159001E0102.dwgNORTH SCALE: 1" = 100' SET NUMBER: 1159-001 SHEET :1PLAN REVISIONSFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636ADDIE'S CORNER MPUDWALL SIGN AERIAL LOCATION EXHIBITWALDROPENGINEERING28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.comCIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS09/02/2020REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS1EXHIBIT C-13.D.j Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) Addie’s Corner MPUD – PL20200001265 Deviation Narrative Page 1 of 1 JUSTIFICATIONS FOR REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC ADDIE’S CORNER MPUD Deviation No. 6: Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.4., On-Premises Signs, which allows a maximum of two (2) wall signs for end units within shopping centers and multiple- occupancy parcels , or single occupancy parcels where there is double frontage on a public right-of- way , to allow Parcel 1 two (2) additional wall signs for a total of four (4) wall signs, and Parcel 3 one (1) additional wall sign for a total of three (3) wall signs. This deviation only applies to Tract A of the MPUD as shown on Exhibit C-1. JUSTIFICATION: The requested deviation will allow for enhanced visibility of Chick-fil-A (Parcel #1), and Aldi (Parcel #3) businesses located within Tract A of the Addie’s Corner MPUD. The deviation requests additional wall signs, but the overall wall signage will not exceed the total allowable sign face area as permitted by the LDC. Tract A has multiple road frontages including Addison Place Drive and Immokalee Road, as well as areas of internal parking and drive aisles. The proposed Chick-fil-A and Aldi are a substantial distance from the travel lanes of Immokalee Road, which is separated from Tract A by an existing sidewalk and the 100-foot Collier County Cocohatchee canal. The separation from Tract A to Immokalee Road ranges in width from 150’ to 216’ and thus appropriate and visible signage is critical to the businesses, and to the safety of the traveling public. The additional wall signs will assist the traveling public in locating their destination safely and without causing unsafe driving conditions while traveling internal to the PUD and along external rights-of-way. Directly north of Addison Place Drive, also within the boundary of the MPUD, are existing multi-family apartments. The additional signage will assist those residents and their guests traveling along Addison Place Drive in navigating these businesses. The additional signs will not create a negative visual impact due to the intervening landscaping on Tract C, and the 10’ Type D landscape buffer provided on Tract A along Addison Place Drive. In addition to the landscaping, the wall signs will not exceed the allowable sign area. The Tree Farm MPUD directly to the east of Tract A is also intended to develop with commercial to the south and to the north of Addison Place Drive therefore these additional wall signs will help identify businesses amongst the larger commercial node at the Immokalee Road/Collier Blvd. intersection. This area is commercial in nature and will not be negatively impacted by additional wall signs, which are screened from the Tree Farm MPUD by a separating landscape buffer and internal driveways. Based on the surrounding land use pattern, frontage on multiple roadways and internal parking areas, and physical separation from Immokalee Road, the additional wall signs are necessary in order to enhance visibility and awareness of the businesses. The additional wall signs will serve to facilitate uninterrupted driving from vehicles passing by on Addison Place Drive or Immokalee Road. The wall signs will allow for additional visibility which assists the traveling public in determining destinations without impeding traffic flow and causing unsafe driving conditions. The two (2) wall sign limitation in this case is onerous and limiting considering the multiple frontages of Tract A and the separation from Immokalee Road. The Tract A signage will comply with the LDC in regards to all other signage requirements. For these reasons, the Applicant respectfully requests approval of this deviation. 3.D.j Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) Addie’s Corner MPUD – PL20200001265 Last Revised: September 2, 2020 Page 1 of 1 Underline Text is Added Strike-through Text is Deleted EXHIBIT “E” LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC ADDIE’S CORNER MPUD * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 6. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.4., On-Premises Signs, which allows a maximum of two (2) wall signs for end units within shopping centers and multiple-occupancy parcels , or single occupancy parcels where there is double frontage on a public right-of-way , to allow Parcel 1 two (2) additional wall signs for a total of four (4) wall signs, and Parcel 3 one (1) additional wall sign for a total of three (3) wall signs. This deviation only applies to Tract A of the MPUD as shown on Exhibit C-1. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 3.D.j Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 18'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY28'-10" A.F.F.T.O. STEEL0'-0"FIN. FLOOR3'-8" A.F.F.T.O. W.T.11'-4" A.F.F.B.O. CANOPY EQEQ9'-6" SIGN OPNG.7'-11 5/8"SIGN OPNG.5544447722GRADE LINE663321'-0 1/8" A.F.F.CENTER OF LOGO SIGNS111322'-0" A.F.F.T.O. STUD0'-0"FIN. FLOOR3'-8" A.F.F.T.O. W.T.433'-4"Longest distance between 4'-0" min. projections - 94'-6"322EQEQ0'-0"FIN. FLOOR28'-10" A.F.F.T.O. STEEL11'-4" A.F.F.B.O. CANOPY FINISH22'-0" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY49'-6" SIGN OPNG.3'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY55422'-1 1/2" A.F.F.T.O. STEEL20'-0" A.F.F.T.O. STUD7'-11 5/8"SIGN OPNG.72GRADE LINE6346TYP.14312170'-0"FIN. FLOOR3'-8" A.F.F.T.O. W.T.3'-4"Longest distance between 4'-0" min. projections - 73'-8 1/2"32SIGNAGEDESCRIPTIONQUANTITYSQ. FT. PER SIGNTOTALSTOWER SIGN (PRIMARY)274.9149.8TENANT PANEL (ANCILLARY)1135.7135.7TOTAL SIGNAGE149.8SIGNAGE IS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND SHALL BE UNDER SEPARATEPERMIT SUBMITTAL18'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY0'-0"FIN. FLOOR28'-10" A.F.F.T.O. STEEL3GRADE LINE1654156127471422'-0" A.F.F.T.O. STUD22'-0" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY22'-0" A.F.F.T.O. STUD0'-0"FIN. FLOOR3'-8" A.F.F.T.O. W.T.3'-8" A.F.F.T.O. W.T.43'-4" 3'-4"Longest distance between 4'-0" min. projections - 99'-10 1/2"43221GREEN SCREEN WELDEDWIRE TRELLIS SYSTEMGREEN SCREEN WELDEDWIRE TRELLIS SYSTEM110'-0"FIN. FLOOR22'-0" A.F.F.T.O. STUD41GRADE LINE1635645225772413'-8" A.F.F.T.O. W.T.22'-0" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY0'-0"FIN. FLOOR3'-8" A.F.F.T.O. W.T.18'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY3EQEQ2'-0"Longest distance between 4'-0" min. projections - 96'-6 3/4"3'-4" 3'-4"234GREEN SCREEN WELDEDWIRE TRELLIS SYSTEM1ECHELON - JARED TANQUIK-BRIKBUILDING WALL FIELD , CART WALL2BORAL - CHARDONNAY / COBBLEFIELDTHIN STONE VENEERBUILDING WATERTABLE3NICHIHA - BARK (VINTAGE WOOD)FIBER CEMENT BOARDBUMP-OUTS5FIRESTONE - SILVER METALLICMETAL TRIMEDGE METAL6LAMINATORS INC -BRIGHT SILVERALUMINUM COMPOSITE PANELSIGNAGE FIELD7DRYVIT - MONASTERY BROWNE.I.F.S.BUILDING CORNICE4CUSTOM COLOR - AGED BRONZEMETAL TRIMEDGE METALDrawing No.Scale:Project No.Type:Date:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Issued for Site Plan Approval04/29/20Inc.(561) 640-8000(561) 640-8001 fax1171 North State Road 7Royal Palm Beach, FL 33411PLOTTED: 7/9/2020 4:47 PM Date:AIssued:PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEERDATEPROJECT LEADDATESealSealDATEPROJECT DESIGNER1Date:Revisions:BCDE23456789585.742.2222585.924.4914.fax615 Fishers RunVictor, NY 14564615 Fishers Run Victor, NY 14564585.742.2222 - www.apd.comDrawing AlterationIt is a violation of law for any person, unless acting under thedirection of licensed Architect, Professional Engineer, LandscapeArchitect, or Land Surveyor to alter any item on this document in anyway. Any licensee who alters this document is required by law to affixhis or her seal and to add the notation "Altered By" followed by his orher signature and the specific description of the alteration or revision.APD Engineering & Architecture, PLLCwww.apd.comCCopyright 2020Copying, Printing, Software and other processes required to producethese prints can stretch or shrink the actual paper or layout.Therefore, scaling of this drawing may be inaccurate. Contact APDE&A with any need for additional dimensions or clarifications.DO NOT SCALE PLANSStore #:20-0309AALDI Inc.Naples, FLAddison Place DriveNaples, FL 34119Palm Beach County04/02/20RHRDV7ERAs Noted24ExteriorElevationsCBCEE-2Revised per Review Comments07/10/201East ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2South ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3West ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"4North ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"NORTH ELEVATIOND.2.b features included (2 minimum required):·Item vii: Tower element and 15% glazing at the facade (15% glazing provided)·Item v: Trellis / latticework covering minimum of 15% of the facade (18% provided)D.4.a.iii requires 4' projection / recess in facade every 100' max.D.5 treatments included (4 minimum required):·item e: corniceitem i: ornamental & structural architectural details (bump-out)·item l: building baseitem p: pilastersD.8.a - screen wall for OHD complies with option iD.9.b.i requires all facades to be primary facades because project located in PUDD.10.a requires parapet line changes every 100' max. with height of 3' min.WEST ELEVATIOND.2.b features included (2 minimum required):·Item i.a: Glazing covering a minimum of 25% of the facade.Trellis / latticework may count for up to 50% of the window area.(16% glazing and 9% trellis provided = 25%)·Item vii: Tower element and 15% glazing at the facade (16% glazing provided)D.4.a.iii requires 4' projection / recess in facade every 100' max.D.5 treatments included (4 minimum required):·item e: corniceitem i: ornamental & structural architectural details (bump-out)·item l: building baseitem p: pilastersD.9.b.i requires all facades to be primary facades because project located in PUDD.10.a requires parapet line changes every 100' max. with height of 3' min.SOUTH ELEVATIOND.2.b features included (2 minimum required):·Item ii: Projected / recessed entry, 100 sqft min.·Item vii: Tower element and 15% glazing at the facade (19% glazing provided)D.4.a.iii requires 4' projection / recess in facade every 100' max.D.5 treatments included (4 minimum required):·item e: corniceitem j: roof treatment·item k: covered entryitem l: building baseitem p: pilastersD.9.b.i requires all facades to be primary facades because project located in PUDD.10.a requires parapet line changes every 100' max. with height of 3' min.EAST ELEVATIOND.2.b features included (2 minimum required):·Item ii: Projected / recessed entry, 100 sqft min.·Item vii: Tower element and 15% glazing at the facade (28% glazing provided)D.4.a.iii requires 4' projection / recess in facade every 100' max.D.5 treatments included (4 minimum required):·item e: cornicetem j: roof treatment·item k: covered entryitem l: building baseD.9.b.i requires all facades to be primary facades because project located in PUDD.10.a requires parapet line changes every 100' max. with height of 3' min.Smooth conc block is limited to 33% of the facade area: Elevations show 20%3.D.jPacket Pg. 666Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) '5$:1%<%HQ+ROOLGD\6725(180%(5 6725($''5(66 $&&28175(3%HQ+ROOLGD\&KLFNILO$DW1DSOHV)/ $GGLHV '5$:,1*'$7(-DQXDU\,PPRNDOHH5G 5(9,6,21'$7(-XO\1DSOHV)/ / 7+,6'5$:,1*,6$125,*,1$/8138%/,6+(''(6,*1&5($7(' %<&/$<7216,*16,1&,7,612772%(5(352'8&(' &+$1*('25(;+,%,7('72$1<21(2876,'(2)<285 &203$1<,1:+2/(25,13$57:,7+287:5,77(13(50,66,21 )5207+(2:1(52)&/$<7216,*16,1&$1<68&+$&7,216 0$<%(68%-(&772/(*$/$&7,21,1$&28572)/$: $//(/(&75,&$/ 6,*16$5( 92/76 81/(66 27+(5:,6(,1',&$7(' '5$:,1*),/(&)$1$3/(6)/ $'',(6 6,*1$*(&'5 6,7(3/$1 $//5,*+765(6(59('& 1RUWK/DNH'ULYH /DNH&LW\*$  ZZZFOD\WRQVLJQVFRP6 ,1&1 ( 6,7( 3/$1 % & ( ' )3 . . 3 3 ++ &% &% 2 1 0 / / · $ · 0 ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ 4W\ 6LJQ$UHD $OORZHG $ 0DLQ,'6LJQ    % :DOO6LJQ,FRQ   & :DOO6LJQ6FULSW VHW   ' :DOO6LJQ6FULSW VHW   ( :DOO6LJQ6FULSW VHW   ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ 4W\ . '27+DQGLFDSSHG3DUNLQJ  . '27+DQGLFDSSHG3DUNLQJ 9DQ  / '273HGHVWULDQ6LJQ  0'276WRS  1 '276WRS'R1RW(QWHU  2'27'R1RW(QWHU  33 '27&XUEVLGH'HOLYHU\  + 0HQX%RDUG /DQH  + 0HQX%RDUG /DQH  &% &OHDUDQFH%DU  )3 )ODJSROH  +LJK:LQG  /96KXWWHUV WRWDORIVL]HV  3.D.j Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) (/(9$7,216 %8,/',1* (/(9$7,216 1RUWK/DNH'ULYH /DNH&LW\*$  ZZZFOD\WRQVLJQVFRP6 ,1&1 ( (/(9$7,216 6&$/(µ   648$5()((7%·µ·µ·µ·µ(4(4(4(4 (4(4 ·µ·µ ·µ·µ ·µ·µ (4(4 (4(4 (4(4 (4(4 (4(4 (4(4·µ·µ·µ·µ·µ·µ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·µ·µ ·µ·µ (4(4 (4(4 (4(4 (4(4 ·µ·µ·µ·µ (4(4 (4(4 648$5()((7' (OHYDWLRQ :LGWK IHHW :LGWK LQFKHV +HLJKW IHHW +HLJKW LQFKHV $UHD 64)7 0XOWLSOLHU $UHD$OORZHG 6,*1%       6,*1&       6,*1'       6,*1(       3.D.j Packet Pg. 668 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) /2&$7,211RUWK/DNH'ULYH /DNH&LW\*$  ZZZFOD\WRQVLJQVFRP6 ,1&1 ( :$//6,*1 % 648$5()((7 (/(9$7,21 6&$/(µ   )$&(6 0&$5',1$/ 5('75$16/8&(179,1</ &$%,1(7 *(1(6,606,1*/(67$*( *6(5,(6 5(' 03$12*5$3+,&,,,)/(;)$&( 63(&,),&$7,216 &$%,1(7 $/80,180&$%,1(7+$6(;758'('$/80,180 )$&(6 )/(;)$&(6'(&25$7(':,7+75$16/8&(179,1</ ),/021685)$&(2)$&5</,& ,17(51$//<,//80,1$7(':,7+:+,7(/('./,*+76 ',6&211(&76:,7&+$65(48,5('3(51(& ·µ·µ(1'9,(: 6&$/(µ   µ63$&(5 µ67$,1/(66 67((//$*%2/7,172%/2&.,1* 6,*1 &$%,1(7 :$//6+($7+,1* $036:,7&+',6&211(&7 ·µ ·µ [µ:22'%/2&.,1* )2502817,1*2)6,*1 [µ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j Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) /2&$7,211RUWK/DNH'ULYH /DNH&LW\*$  ZZZFOD\WRQVLJQVFRP6 ,1&1 ( /(',//80,1$7(' &+$11(//(77(56 &'( 648$5()((7        &+$11(//(77(5)$&(6 5('$&5</,& 75,0&$35(7$,1(5 µ5('-(:(/,7(75,0&$3 63(&,),&$7,216 &+,&.),/$6&5,37/(77(56 /(77(56$5(/(',//80,1$7(' &+$11(//(77(5602817(' 21$/80,180685)$&(2)%8,/',1* :,7+75$16)250(565(027(/< /2&$7('%(+,1'7+(:$//,1 8/$33529('75$16)250(5%2;(6 )$&(6$5(µ$&5</,& 5(78516$5($/80,180 %$&.6$5($/80,180 $//5(78516$5($5&:(/'('72 /(77(5%$&.6 $/80,1805(78516 3$,17('720$7&+ 6+(5:,1:,//,$06 6:/$77( 7+,66,*1,6,7(1'('72%(,167$//(',1$&&25'$1&(:,7+5(48,5(0(1762)$57,&/(2)7+(1$7,21$/ (/(&75,&$/&2'($1'25$33/,&$%/(/2&$/&2'(67+,6,1&/8'(63523(5*5281',1* %21',1*2)7+(6,*1 (/(9$7,21 6&$/(µ   µ63$&(5 /(77(5 5(7851 0$6215<:$// 6&5(:,1 )/(;&211(&725 $0372**/( 6:,7&+',6&211(&7 /('02'8/(6 /('32:(56833/< ,16,'(2)75$16)250(5%2; &52666(&7,21 6&$/(µ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j Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.k Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: Attachment J - Property Hearing Signs (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 3.D.k Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: Attachment J - Property Hearing Signs (13882 : PL20200001265 Addies Corner (PDI)) 11/12/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.E Item Summary: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20190000194 - Chick-Fil-A GLL Selection II Florida, LP requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 07-32, the Pine Air Lakes Planned Unit Development, to reduce the northern landscape buffer of 7.5 ft to a varying width of 4 inches, to 7.5 ft and a reduction in the southern landscape buffer of 10 ft to a varying width of 7-10 ft, and to add new deviations relating to the buffer. The subject property is located at the northwestern corner of Airport Rd. N and Hollywood Dr. in Section 11, Township 49, Range 25, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: James Sabo, Principal Planner) Commissioner District 2 Meeting Date: 11/12/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: James Sabo 10/21/2020 4:53 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 10/21/2020 4:53 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 10/22/2020 10:36 AM Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 10/23/2020 1:00 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Rose Burke Review Item Completed 10/29/2020 5:55 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 10/30/2020 1:42 PM Zoning Anita Jenkins Review Item Completed 11/02/2020 5:19 PM Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 11/12/2020 9:00 AM 3.E Packet Pg. 673 PDI-PL20190000194 PDI Pine Air Lakes- Chick-Fil-A Page 1 of 8 November 12, 2020 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: November 12th, 2020 SUBJECT: PDI-PL20190000194; Pine Air Lakes PUD- Chick-Fil-A OWNER: AGENT: GLL Selection II Florida, LP Gwen Nicholas 5200 Buffington Rd. Interplan, LLC Atlanta, GA 30349 604 Courtland St. Orlando, FL 32804205394 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve an insubstantial change to Ordinance Number 07-32, the Pine Air Lakes Planned Unit Development, to reduce the northern landscape buffer of 7.5 ft to a varying width of 4 in.-7.5 ft and a reduction in the southern landscape buffer of 10 ft to a varying width 7-10 ft as shown in the attached site plan. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at the northwestern corner Airport Rd. N and Hollywood Dr. in Section 11, Township 49, Range 25, Collier County, Florida. Parcel ID: 66760012725 (see location map on following page) 3.E.a Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: Final Staff Rep PL19-0194 Chick Fila (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) PDI-PL20190000194 PDI Pine Air Lakes- Chick-Fil-A Page 2 of 8 November 12, 2020 3.E.aPacket Pg. 675Attachment: Final Staff Rep PL19-0194 Chick Fila (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) PDI-PL20190000194 PDI Pine Air Lakes- Chick-Fil-A Page 3 of 8 November 12, 2020 PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property was developed as part of the Pine Air Lakes plat in 1995 and is the site of a Chick-Fil-A restaurant which was developed in accordance with Site Development Plan (SDP) 2005-AR-7838 as amended. The petitioner is proposing an insubstantial change to the PUD to allow Chick-Fil-A to reduce its landscape buffer requirements on the northern property line to allow parking spaces to be moved closer to the northern property line to create more space inside of the site, see SDPA-PL20180001622. This request is being made to accommodate an increase in the kitchen size, an additional drive-thru lane, and provide a 20 ft drive isle that will a allow for fire rescue, delivery, waste management vehicles to have adequate space to turn in the on the site. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Panera Bread Restaurant which according to the official zoning maps is within the Pine Air Lakes PUD East: Airport Rd Right of way then Single-Family Residential development which according to the official zoning maps is within the RSF-3 zoning district. South: Hollywood Dr. Right of way then a SunTrust Bank which according to the official zoning map is within the Pine Air Lakes PUD West: Vacant grocery store which according to the official zoning maps is within the Pine Air Lakes PUD 3.E.a Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: Final Staff Rep PL19-0194 Chick Fila (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) PDI-PL20190000194 PDI Pine Air Lakes- Chick-Fil-A Page 4 of 8 November 12, 2020 STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Planning: This application is not adding uses or increasing the intensity of the previously approved uses in the Pine Air Lakes PUD, it is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. See Attachment A for the complete report from Comprehensive Planning staff. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). No revisions to the environmental portions of the PUD petition are being proposed. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the proposed changes to the PUD documents and found no traffic issue. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPENT INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE CRITERIA: There are three types of changes to a PUD Ordinance: Substantial, Insubstantial, and Minor. An insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or minor change. An insubstantial change to an approved PUD Ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. LDC Section10.02.13.E.1 a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)? No, there is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD. b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? No, the use will remain as a restaurant and the building height will not change. c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development in excess of five (5) percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five (5) acres in area? No, there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan. 3.E.a Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: Final Staff Rep PL19-0194 Chick Fila (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) PDI-PL20190000194 PDI Pine Air Lakes- Chick-Fil-A Page 5 of 8 November 12, 2020 d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? There would be no increase to the size of areas used for non-residential uses and no relocation of non-residential uses. e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities? No, there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment. f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? Though this PDI is being applied for to allow a reduction in the landscape buffers in order to accommodate an additional drive through, there is no difference in trip generation based on the number of PM peak trips. g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? No, the proposed changes will not impact or increase stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharge. h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? No. There will be no incompatible relationships with abutting land uses. i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? No. Staff from Comprehensive Planning staff determined the proposed changes to the PUD Document would be consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Both environmental and Transportation Planning staff reviewed this petition, and no changes to the PUD Document are proposed that would be deemed inconsistent with the CCME or the Transportation Element of the GMP. This petition does not propose any increase in density or intensity of the permitted land uses. 3.E.a Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: Final Staff Rep PL19-0194 Chick Fila (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) PDI-PL20190000194 PDI Pine Air Lakes- Chick-Fil-A Page 6 of 8 November 12, 2020 j. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to Sec. 380.06 (19), F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec. 380.06 (19)(e)2., F.S., and any changes to a DRI/PUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier Cou nty under Section 10.02.13 of the LDC. Zoning staff has reviewed the proposed changes to the PUD and found that the criterion of Sec. 380.06 (19)(e)2., F.S. do not create a substantial deviation. The project is reviewed by Collier County staff under Section 10.02.13 of the LDC. k. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under Section(s) 10.02.13 E.? Based upon the analysis provide above, the proposed change is not deemed to be substantial. Section 10.02.13.E.2 Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original application? No, the proposed changes do not affect the original analysis and findings for the most recent zoning action. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: Deviation #2 seeks relief from A deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02, Table 2.4, which allows abutting commercial zoned properties to share a 15’ landscape buffer, with each abutting property contributing 7.5’, to instead allow a reduction of the 7.5’ portion of the landscape buffer on the northern side of the Chick-Fil-A parcel to a varying width of 4- inches to 7.5’. The encroached buffer area and removed trees from the reduced buffer area shall be re-allocated elsewhere on the Chick Fil A parcel and nine (9) supplemental understory trees shall be provided per “Deviation 1” Landscape Buffer Exhibit, in the north buffer. This Deviation applies only to the Chick Fil A parcel within this PUD. Petitioner’s Justification: Section 4.06.02, Table 2.4 of the LDC allows a fifteen foot (15’) shared buffer of neighboring industrial/commercial zoned properties, with each abutting property contributing 7.5’. The proposed deviation requests to reduce the Chick-fil-A portion of the shared northern landscape buffer to varying widths of 4’ to 7.5’ and reallocating the greenspace and affected understory trees elsewhere on site. The reduction of the Chick-fil- A 7.5’ portion of the northern buffer will allow for the addition of a second drive through lane with the addition of a face-to-face order meal delivery canopy as well as widening of the northern drive aisle. The reduction of the landscape buffer is the minimum distance 3.E.a Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: Final Staff Rep PL19-0194 Chick Fila (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) PDI-PL20190000194 PDI Pine Air Lakes- Chick-Fil-A Page 7 of 8 November 12, 2020 required to provide for the second drive through lane, a 20’ fire truck access path and angled parking between the existing building and the property line. A greater number of patrons will be able to be served simultaneously with the implementation of a second drive- through lane and face-to-face meal delivery canopy. Furthermore, the second drive- through lane will significantly reduce traffic congestion on site, circulate drive-through patrons more rapidly and relieve traffic flow from backing up into drive aisles of the Pine Air Lakes PUD. Compliant with Section 10.02.13.E.2 of the LDC, the requested deviation does not warrant a substantial or minor change based on evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13.E.1. Approval of this deviation will not change the boundary of the PUD or the density and or intensity of the permitted land uses, which are considered substantial changes. With no change in density or intensity, traffic counts for the project will be unchanged by the requested deviation. Similarly, with no change in uses or intensity, the project remains consistent with the Growth Management Plan and compatible with adjacent uses. Because the deviation only changes the width of the Chick-fil-A 7.5’ portion of the northern landscape buffer and the reduced greenspace within the northern buffer will be reallocated on site, the deviation will not decrease preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas within the development, nor will it increase the size of areas used for nonresidential uses. The deviation will not impact stormwater retention or discharges, as the proposed change is consistent with the approved Environmental Resource Permit. The proposed change is to a PUD district that is not designated as a DRI and does not impact any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described in Section 10.02.13.E.1 in the Land Development Code. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Given the existing site constraints and supplemental planting proposed, staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The Neighborhood Informational Meeting (NIM) was held for the above- referenced project on Thursday, October 3, 2019 at 6:00pm at the Collier County Library located at 2385 Orange Blossom Drive. In attendance was Sara Guntrum and Kendra Lewis, of Interplan, LLC, Chris Gregory and P.J. Rodriguez of Chick-fil-A and Gil Martinez of Collier County. There was no public opposition to this proposed project as there were no members of the community present. The meeting was adjourned at 6:28 pm, a recording of which has been provided to Collier County staff. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve Petition PDI-PL20190000194 Pine Air Lakes, Chick-Fil-A restaurant. 3.E.a Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: Final Staff Rep PL19-0194 Chick Fila (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) PDI-PL20190000194 PDI Pine Air Lakes- Chick-Fil-A Page 8 of 8 November 12, 2020 Attachments: A) Conceptual Site Plan document B) Proposed Insubstantial Change Text C) Comprehensive Planning Review Memo, dated 12-20-2019 D) Application/Backup Materials 3.E.a Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: Final Staff Rep PL19-0194 Chick Fila (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) PermitPermit Information contained on this drawing and in all digital files produced for above named project may not be reproduced in any manner without express written or verbal consent from authorized project representatives. MLD PROJECT # PRINTED FOR DATE SHEET SHEET NUMBER DRAWN BY Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 REVISION SCHEDULE FSU#Pine Air Lakes PUD2018153 9.7.18 MBNaples Center FSU5825 Airport Pulling Rd NNaples, FL 341091721 NO.DATE DESCRIPTION PD-101CHICK-FIL-ADeviation #1 Landscape Exhibit 0 20 40 FT LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS A.BUFFER REQUIRED 1.East Type "D" Airport Rd 175 LF @ 1 tree/30 LF =5.8 or 6 trees; Plus double row of shrubs North Shared Type "A"261 LF-21 LF drive= 240 LF @ 1 tree/30 LF =8 trees North Buffer area = 240 x 7.5 =1800 SF West Type "D"175 LF-68 LF drives= 107 LF @ 1 tree/30 LF =3.6 or 4 trees; Plus double row of shrubs South Type "D"255 LF @ 1 tree/30 LF =8.5 or 9 trees; Plus double row of shrubs PROVIDED 1.East Type "D" Airport Rd 6 Ex Black Olive (6,7,9,11,12,13)Row of Cocoplum added to ex shrubs North Shared Type "A"Deviation allows for planting of buffer in other areas on site. 3 Ex Mags (8,10,14) on East Buffer, 3 Pigeon Plums, 1 Maple (west buffer, rear of bldg), 1 Maple (SE corner)=8 trees North Buffer Deviation Area =654 SF West Type "D"1 Ex Mag (29), 1 Ex Oak (28), 2 Dahoon Holly counts as 1 (21,22), 2 Ex Palm(20,23)+New Palm counts as 1 = 4 Trees Row of Cocoplum added to ex shrubs South Type "D"3 Ex Oak (3,4,18), 3 Maple, 3 Oak = 9 Trees Row of Cocoplum added to ex shrubs South Buffer Deviation Area =125 SF Total Deviation North =654 SF Compensation provided for Deviation in other areas (shown in purple)=764 SF 110 SF Surplus B.INTERIOR VUA REQUIRED 1.VUA = 26180 SF; Interior LS area = 10% of VUA =2618 SF 2.1 Tree/250 SF of Interior LS area =10 Trees PROVIDED 1.2620 SF interior landscape areas provided (see green shaded area) 2.2 Ex Palms (1,2) + 1 Palm counts as 1 tree, 7 Maple, 2 Pigeon Plum =10 Trees total C.BUILDING FOUNDATION REQUIRED 1.25 % of the combined total of all building façade length × (Width) 10' wide = (Area) Total Planting Area Required. 325 LF x 10' x 25%=812.5 SF 2.Trees and Palms @ 1/300 SF of required foundation planting =2.7 or 3 Trees or Palms PROVIDED 1.821 SF foundation landscape areas provided (see yellow shaded area) 2.Palm counts as 1, 2 Simpson Stopper =3 Trees BUFFER COMPENSATION AREA TOTAL 764 SF X EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING BUFFER TREE TO REMAIN LEGEND INTERIOR VUA LANDSCAPE AREA 2620 SF BUILDING FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE AREA 822 SF ORANGE SHADE WITH DASH OUTLINE ARE EXISTING TREES TO COMPENSATE FOR TREE LOSS IN NORTH BUFFER NORTH BUFFER AREA ENCROACHMENT 654 SF EXISTING BUFFER TO REMAIN PROPOSED TREES ORANGE SHADE ARE PROPOSED TREES TO COMPENSATE FOR TREE LOSS IN NORTH BUFFER NOTE: ALL PROHIBITED EXOTIC VEGETATION SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND IT SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF EXOTICS IN PERPETUITY. (LDC 3.05.08) XX TGAS X X N 01°08'21" E 347.00' P&MBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWEB SIGN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1920 21 22 23 24 26 28 29 39 STOPBAR CWCWCWXXXXXXXXX X XX X X NORTH 7.5' TYPE "A" LS BUFFER WEST 10' TYPE "D" LS BUFFER SOUTH 10' TYPE "D" LS BUFFER EAST 20' TYPE "D" LS BUFFER Deviation Compensation Area X NORTH BUFFER AREA ENCROACHMENT Deviation Compensation Area EXISTING TREES IN NORTH BUFFER BELONG TO PARCEL TO NORTH Deviation Compensation Area Deviation Compensation Area 2.24.20 3.E.b Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: Attachment A Conceptual Site Plan (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) *** For the purposes of Section 10, Deviation 1, strikethrough language is removed from Ordinance 17 - 32 and underlined language is being added.*** ************* 3.05 BUFFERS A. All parcels within the Pine Air Lakes development adjacent to interior roads shall provide a minimum fifteen (15) foot wide landscape strip buffer. (Excluding parcels designated Lakes/Open S[pace.) B. A minimum buffer fifteen (15) feet wide will be provided along all parcels (except Lake/Open Space parcels) which are adjacent to surrounding land presently zoned industrial/commercial. A minimum twenty (20) foot buffer will be provided along Airport Pulling Road. This section is subject to Section 10, Deviations, from LDC of the Pine Air Lakes PUD Ordinance 17-32. C. All other buffers shall meet the minimum standards of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of development of the parcel. D. No parking, outside display signs, or other structures shall be located within buffers. *********** 3.E.c Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: Attachment B PUD Language (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) *** For the purposes of Section 10, Deviation 1, strikethrough language is removed from Ordinance 17 - 32 and underlined language is being added.*** ************ [“SECTION 10”] DEVIATIONS 1. A deviation from Section 4.06.02, Table 2.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code, which allows abutting commercial zoned properties to share a 15’ landscape buffer, with each abutting property contributing 7.5’, to instead allow a reduction of the 7.5’ portion of the landscape buffer on the northern side of the Chick-Fil-A parcel to a varying width of 4” to 7.5’. The encroached buffer area and removed trees from the reduced buffer area shall be re-allocated elsewhere on the Chick Fil A parcel and nine (9) supplemental understory trees shall be provided per “Deviation 1” Landscape Buffer Exhibit, in the north buffer. This Deviation applies only to the Chick Fil A parcel within this PUD. 3.E.c Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: Attachment B PUD Language (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 Page 1 of 2 Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: Gil Martinez, Principal Planner Zoning Services Section, Zoning Division From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division Date: December 20, 2019 Subject: Future Land Use Element Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PDI - PL20190000194 - REV 3 PETITION NAME: Chick-fil-A at Naples Center REQUEST: The petitioner (Chick-fil-A) may be requesting a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) insubstantial change (PDI) to the Pine Air Lakes CPUD to amend Ord. #07-32, Section 3.05, C. Minimum yard requirements – #2. The amendment with Submittal 2 will amend #2 to read, “Front yard CR 951 and Lely Cultural Parkway: the distance equal to the height of the building, but no less than twenty- five (25) feet. However, the minimum front yard for structures up to Thirty (30) feet in zoned height, shall be twenty-five (25) feet for lot 12 of Edison Village.” Submittal 2 amended the Master Plan and the site Plan and included a request for a buffer deviation for Section 4.06.02 to eliminate the required 7.5 feet for a shared 15’ buffer. Submittal 3, in response to staff comments, revised the proposed Master Plan, submitted an Affidavit of Authorization, and revised the deviations document. LOCATION: The subject site is located at the northwest corner of Lely Cultural Parkway and Collier Boulevard (CR 951), ±1,750 feet south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, in Section 22, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject +1.75 acres are designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, as identified in the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. This project site is within the Edison Village PUD, which was previously rezoned for commercial/office uses (via Ordinance #00-83) after meeting the Future Land Use Element’s criteria for Office and In-fill Subdistrict. This amendment is not revising any previously approved uses, intensity of use, density, boundary, access, height of buildings, preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space, and the Office and Infill subdistrict does not include setback provisions. Therefore, it continues to be consistent with the Future Land Use Element. Select FLUE Policies are shown below (in italics), followed by staff analysis in [bracketed bold text]. 3.E.d Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: Attachment C Comp Plan Consistency memo (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 Page 2 of 2 FLUE Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety.] FLUE Objective 7 and Relevant Policies: Due to the minor changes proposed (no changes in permitted uses, densities, or intensities) beyond the currently approved Edison Village PUD, staff is of the opinion that a re-evaluation of FLUE policies under Objective 7 (pertaining to access, interconnections, walkability, etc.) is not necessary. CONCLUSION Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed Planned Unit Development amendment may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond V. Bellows, Manager, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section PDI-PL2019-0194 Chick-fil-A -Pine Air Lakes R3.docx 3.E.d Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: Attachment C Comp Plan Consistency memo (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) UTILITY CONTACTSCONTACTS UTILITY NOTESGENERAL NOTES VICINITY MAPSITE DATA INDEX TO DRAWINGS LEGAL DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY STANDARD NOTES: PINE AIR LAKES PUD, Ord. 07-32 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT TABLE: COLLIER COUNTY ENG / UTILITY NOTES: THIS DOCUMENT IS "NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION" UNLESS THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL APPEAR BELOW. AA 003420 CA 8660 604 COURTLAND STREET SUITE 100 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32804 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING INTERIOR DESIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT 3.E.e Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.ePacket Pg. 688Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) DEMOLITION NOTES DEMOLITION PLAN 1" = 20' DEMOLITION KEY NOTES POLLUTION CONTROL NOTES1 2 2 2 1 11 2 2 3 3 4 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 2 10 10 11 13 14 1415151515 15 15 15 4 6 16 13 2 22 1313 SDP-2005-AR-7838 5 17 1 2 2 1 18 18 18 18 2 6 6 6 6 2 6 14 14 7 7 7 19 19 19 19 2 2 2 2 6 TV C O SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 11.91 SET BENCHMARK N&D 2 NAVD 88 SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 12.27 N&D LB #1772 4 NAVD 88 SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 12.06 N&D LB #1772 5 NAVD 88 20 20 20 20 20 THIS DOCUMENT IS "NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION" UNLESS THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL APPEAR BELOW. AA 003420 CA 8660 604 COURTLAND STREET SUITE 100 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32804 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING INTERIOR DESIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Stuart Anderson on 11/18/2019 using a digital signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. 3.E.e Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) TV SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 11.91 SET BENCHMARK N&D 2 NAVD 88 SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 12.27 N&D LB #1772 4 NAVD 88 SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 12.06 N&D LB #1772 5 NAVD 88 LEGEND SITE PLAN DESIGN NOTES & KEY PLAN THIS DOCUMENT IS "NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION" UNLESS THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL APPEAR BELOW. AA 003420 CA 8660 604 COURTLAND STREET SUITE 100 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32804 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING INTERIOR DESIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Stuart Anderson on 11/18/2019 using a digital signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. 3.E.e Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) TV SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 11.91 SET BENCHMARK N&D 2 NAVD 88 SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 12.27 N&D LB #1772 4 NAVD 88 SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 12.06 N&D LB #1772 5 NAVD 88 1" = 20' LEGEND THIS DOCUMENT IS "NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION" UNLESS THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL APPEAR BELOW. AA 003420 CA 8660 604 COURTLAND STREET SUITE 100 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32804 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING INTERIOR DESIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Stuart Anderson on 11/18/2019 using a digital signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. 3.E.e Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN 1" = 30' EROSION CONTROL DETAILS WNER/AGENT CERTIFICATIONS: ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION: POLLUTION CONTROL NOTES TV C O SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 11.91 SET BENCHMARK N&D 2 NAVD 88 SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 12.27 N&D LB #1772 4 NAVD 88 SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 12.06 N&D LB #1772 5 NAVD 88 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 NTS CRUSHED STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT THIS DOCUMENT IS "NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION" UNLESS THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL APPEAR BELOW. AA 003420 CA 8660 604 COURTLAND STREET SUITE 100 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32804 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING INTERIOR DESIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Stuart Anderson on 11/18/2019 using a digital signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. 3.E.e Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) BUILDING BUILDING FOOTING 12"4"LANDSCAPE AREA LANDSCAPE AREA WIDT H V A RI E S 4"14 1 14 1 VA R I E S SE E S I T E P L A N 6" 6" RAM P RAMP 4" 6"6"4"A A STOP VAN ACCESSIBLE RESERVED PARKING 7' M I N . W I D T H 5' LA N DI N G MI N.(4' MIN. WI D T H) 1:20 M A X. LIGHT BROOM FINISH 6" STANDUP CURB OR CURB & GUTTER AS APPLICABLE (SEE SITE PLAN) PROVIDE 5' SQUARE MINIMUM LANDING AT TOP OF RAMP FOR CHANGE IN DIRECTION EXPANSION JOINT IF CHANGE IN DIRECTION OR IF RAMP EXCEEDS 30 FEET 4" THICK CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION 1:20 MAX. MONOLITHIC CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE RAMP (3000 PSI) NOTE: INSTALL 1" TOOLED RADIUS ON ALL EXPOSED EDGES SIMILAR AS SHOWN ON CURB DETAIL RETAINING CURB SUBGRADE COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED IN GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CURB (BEYOND) CONCRETE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT 1.5% CROSS SLOPE MAX. SECTION A-A 1'-8"3'-0"1'-4"3'-0"8"4" 1'-8" 4" 4"8"NOTE: SIGNS SHALL BE FABRICATED USING S/F 0.08 NON-ILLUMINATED ALUMINUM WITH VINYL COPY APPLIED TO THE FIRST SURFACE. RED 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR WHITE 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR3"x3" SQUARE ALUMINUM TUBING, DARK BRONZE COLOR OR AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL JURISDICTION OR LANDLORD REQUIREMENTS. 30"30"7'-0"2'-0" (MIN.)1"8"Ø CONCRETE BASE GREEN 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR BLUE 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR WHITE 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR BLUE 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR WITH WHITE 'REFLECTIVE TEXT' 2"x2" SQ. TUBING 1"R 12"18"6"LETTERING STYLE TO BE HELVETICA MEDIUM NOTE: VERIFY COLORS WITH LOCAL MUNICIPALITY. D RIGHT TURN ONLY SIGN (REFER TO SIGN PACKAGE) C CIRCLE BUILDING FOR DRIVE-THRU SIGN (REFER TO SIGN PACKAGE) E ONE WAY SIGN (REFER TO SIGN PACKAGE)24"18"24"18" B ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (MUTCD R 7-8 AND R 7-8P5) (CIVIL TO VERIFY SIGN PANELS AND COLORS WITH STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS) NOTE: "SIGNS PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY CFA SIGNAGE CONTRACTOR" A STOP SIGN & STANDARD MOUNTING POST (MUTCD R 1-1) SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS VARY - HOLD FLUSH WITH FINISHED FLOOR AT ENTRANCE WAYS. PLANTING AREAS MAY EXIST BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE BACK-OF-SIDEWALK (SEE SITE PLAN). EXPANSION JOINTS DO NOT APPLY TO SIDEWALK SECTION ADJACENT TO PLANTING AREAS. NOTICE: ALWAYS ALIGN CURB AND SIDEWALK JOINTS. COMPACTED SUBGRADE AS SPECIFIED 7.0' MIN. (SEE SITE PLAN) 24" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER PAVEMENT, AS SPECIFIED IN GEOTECHNICAL REPORT STABILIZED AGGREGATE BASE COARSE, AS SPECIFIED FOR PAVEMENT RAMP (BEYOND) SLOPE 1.5% MAX. SEE SIT E PL A N MATCH SIDEWALK WIDTH (3' MIN. RAMP) PAVEMENT7' MIN.1V:12H MAX. 6' MIN. TRANSITION 6"6"1V:14H MAX. 1V:12H MAX. 6' MIN. TRANSITION CURB SIDEWALK CURB SIDEWALK NOTES: 1. CURB RAMP RUNNING SLOPES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 1:14 AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE 1.5% OR FLATTER. 2. DETECTABLE WARNING (IF REQUIRED) SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A DEPTH OF 24" FROM THE BACK OF CURB LINE FOR THE LENGTH OF THE RAMP LANDING 3. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY TEXTURING PRODUCTS CONFORMING TO PROWAG R304. TRANSITION SLOPES ARE NOT TO HAVE DETECTABLE WARNINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM LOCAL CODES ARE MET. 4. WHERE A CURB RAMP IS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN AN EXISTING CURB, CURB & GUTTER AND/OR SIDEWALK, THE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER SHALL BE REMOVED TO THE NEAREST JOINT BEYOND THE CURB TRANSITIONS OR TO THE EXTENT THAT NO REMAINING SECTION OF CURB OR CURB & GUTTER IS LESS THAN 5' LONG. THE EXISTING SIDEWALK SHALL BE REMOVED TO THE NEAREST JOINT BEYOND THE TRANSITION SLOPE WALK AROUND OR TO THE EXTENT THAT NO REMAINING SECTION OF SIDEWALK IS LESS THAN 5'. 5. THE PLAN MUST PROVIDE FOR DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE COLORS OR MATERIALS THAT PROVIDE THE NECESSARY CONTRAST, EITHER DARK-ON-LIGHT, OR LIGHT-ON-DARK. STANDARD DOME COLOR IS BRICK RED. 6. TRUNCATED DOMES TO BE INSTALLED USING ARMOR TILE CAST IN PLACE DOME TACTILE TILE. PART NUMBER ADA-2424 OR OTHER EQUIVALENT APPROVED MATERIAL. PREFERRED MANUFACTURER ARMOR TILE TACTILE SYSTEMS LANCE MITCHELL(919)622-4615 UNLESS PAVERS ARE REQUIRED, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THAT CURB RAMPS MEET LOCAL CODES AND ADA REQUIREMENTS. CONCRETE X X X XX X XXXXXX 1 2" EXPANSION JOINT (SEE NOTE #1) SMOOTH TOOLED FINISH AROUND ALL EDGES AND JOINTS (TYP) LIGHT BROOM FINISH (PERPENDICULAR TO TRAVEL PATH) 6"x6"x6 GAUGE WELDED WIRE FABRIC SEATED AND SECURED ON STANDS 5'-0" (TYP)2"2"4"1 2" CONTRACTION JOINT (SEE NOTE #1) CONTRACTION JOINT 3000 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CONCRETE MIX PER SPECIFICATION.2"4"EXPANSION JOINT 1 2" CONTRACTION JOINT (SEE NOTE #1)SEE PLANWHITE 'REFLECTIVE' LETTERS FACE: 3M REFLECTIVE COPY (#3272 RED)COLOR G PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK (REFER TO SIGN PACKAGE) F LEFT TURN ONLY SIGN (REFER TO SIGN PACKAGE)24"18"18.5"12" 1:14 M A X . S L O P E DO N O T E X C E E D 60° PARKING 90° PARKING 12.0' C A R ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN IN BOLLARD 24" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 4.5'30° 9'20.1' **TYPICAL9.0' TYPI C A L 10.39' 60° 5.0' 4" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE 4" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE (MIN) 4" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE (MIN.) 4" PAINTED LINE (TYP.) 8" DIAM.1'-4"10"1'-10"8"1'-2" 14"R GUTTER SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 5% AT LANDING AREA. 4"NOTES: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO CHICK-FIL-A PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS, SEE DETAIL 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHITE REFLECTIVE PAINT ON ASPHALT & YELLOW REFLECTIVE PAINT ON CONCRETE. BOTH RAMP CURBS TO BE PAINTED YELLOW, SEE PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATION PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS: STANDARDS: 1. ALWAYS FOLLOW ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING AUTHORITY'S STANDARDS. 2. SURFACES SHOULD BE CLEAN, DRY, AND FREE FROM LOOSE OR PEELING PAINT. REMOVE ALL OIL, DUST, GREASE, DIRT, AND OTHER FOREIGN MATERIAL TO ENSURE ADEQUATE ADHESION. DO NOT APPLY WHEN AIR OR SURFACE TEMPERATURES ARE BELOW 40°F. 3. APPLY SHERWIN-WILLIAMS SETFAST PREMIUM ALKYD ZONE MARKING PAINT A300 WHITE OR A303 YELLOW USING EITHER AIRLESS OR CONVENTIONAL LINE STRIPING EQUIPMENT. USE THE FOLLOWING SETTINGS AS A GUIDE-ACTUAL SETTINGS DEPEND ON ATMOSPHERIC CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION: AIRLESS ·PRESSURE 1800-2700 PSI ·HOSE 14"-3 8" ID ·TIP 0.015"-0.017" ·FILTER 60 MESH ·REDUCTION ONLY IF NECESSARY, UP TO 1PT/GAL VM&P NAPTHA R1K3 CONVENTIONAL ·GUN BLINKS 21 (BLEEDER) OR EQUIVALENT ·FLUID NOZZLE #68 ·AIR NOZZLE INTERNAL MIX, #709 ·ATOMIZATION PRESSURE 45-80 PSI ·FLUID PRESSURE 40-70 PSI ·REDUCTION ONLY IF NECESSARY, UP TO 1PT/GAL VM&P NAPTHA R1K3 ·SHERWIN WILLIAMS, H&C SHARK GRIP SLIP RESISTANT ADDITIVE TO BE MEASURED AND ADDED TO ALL PAINT PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN SPECIFICATIONS. MIX THOROUGHLY PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS SO THAT NO CLUMPING IS APPARENT AND UNTIL EVEN DISTRIBUTION IS ACHIEVED. MAINTAIN EVEN DISTRIBUTION OF ADDITIVE IN PAINT THROUGHOUT THE APPLICATION PROCESS. ·MIX PAINT THOROUGHLY BY BOXING, STIRRING, OR POWER AGITATION BEFORE USE. APPLY AT 15 MILS WET TO ACHIEVE A SPREAD RATE OF 400-500 LINEAL FEET OF STANDARD 4" STRIPE PER GALLON. APPLIED AT THIS RATE AT 70 DEGREES F AND 50% RELATIVE HUMIDITY, PAINT WILL DRY WITH NO TRAFFIC PICKUP AFTER 20 MINUTES. ·GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO RE-STRIPE THE LOT 45 DAYS AFTER OPENING. 3 'R PAINT SOLID PAINT SOLID 1'-2"1'-8"1'-8"1'-2"3'-0" 1'-0"1'-2"1'-0"1'-2"3'-0"3'-0"NOTES: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO CHICK-FIL-A PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS, SEE DETAIL 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHITE REFLECTIVE PAINT ON ASPHALT & YELLOW REFLECTIVE PAINT ON CONCRETE. NOTES: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO CHICK-FIL-A PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS, SEE DETAIL 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHITE REFLECTIVE PAINT ON ASPHALT & YELLOW REFLECTIVE PAINT ON CONCRETE. 3. IF STOP SIGN IS PROPOSED, STOP LINE GRAPHIC IS NOT REQUIRED. NOTES: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO CHICK-FIL-A PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS, SEE DETAIL 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHITE REFLECTIVE PAINT ON ASPHALT & YELLOW REFLECTIVE PAINT ON CONCRETE, UNLESS UPON VERIFICATION BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IT IS DETERMINED THAT LOCAL, STATE, OR ADA CODES DIFFER, IN WHICH CASE THESE CODES SHALL GOVERN. VARI E S, S E E SI T E P L A N 5' MI N. FLARED SIDES 1V:12H MAX.4.0'PAINTED ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL EXPANSION JOINT EXPANSION JOINT 24" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER EXPANSION JOINT EXPANSION JOINT LIGHT BROOM FINISH SIDEWALK ACCESSIBLE RAMP STOP BAR 2'-0"LENGTH VARIES PAINT FULL LANE WIDTH CENTER "STOP" IN DRIVE LANE 4" TYP.3'-0" 2'-0" 1 2" DECK-O-FOAM EXPANSION JOINT FILLER W/ PRE-SCORED STRIP, "ZIP STRIP" OR OTHER CFA APPROVED MATERIAL URETHANE JOINT SEALING COMPOUND 14T24.625" 14 DOMES @ 1.670" O/C 1.2625"1.2625"24.625"14 DOMES @ 1.670" O/C8.0'8.0"8 SPACES OUT TO OUT @ 3.00" O/C NOM.3.00"3.00"1.2625"1.2625"Ø0.90"Ø0.45"0.06250.09' 0.09'0.09' 0.09'2.350" TYP.NOTE: FIELD LEVEL MICRO-TEXTURE 41 POINTS PER SQUARE INCH 1.2625"1.2625"1.670" TYP.PLAN REFLECTED PLAN DETAIL-1 DETAIL-1 BB A A 0.625" DIA. HOLES THROUGH EMBEDMENT FLANGES INTERNAL EMBEDMENT FLANGE 9 PER TILE 0.1875" DIA. x 0.0625" HIGH MICRO-TEXTURE UNDERSIDE OF TILE 0.625"0.625"0.750" TYP.0.625" TYP. 1.670" TYP. 0.1875"1.375"1.2625"1.670" TYP. R0.375" 1.2625"1.670" TYP.1.375"1.670" TYP.1.2625"1.670" TYP.1.2625" 0.1875' 3.00" 3.00"3.00" TYP.0.250"0.625" DIA. HOLE EMBEDMENT FLANGES AS SHOWN IN REFLECTED PLAN INTERNAL EMBEDMENT FLANGE @ 3" O/C (SEE PLAN FOR ORIENTATION)0.1875".01875"0.1875" DIA. VENT HOLE (ONE PER CELL EACH SIDE) 90° POINTS 0.045" HIGH 0.625" HOLE THROUGH EMBEDMENT FLANGES AS SHOWN IN REFLECTED PLAN CENTERED TYP.SECTION A-A SECTION B-B0.20"NOTE:OPTIONAL SOUND AMPLIFYING PLATE ADDED BY MANUFACTURER0.20"0.1875" DIA. VENT HOLE (ONE PER CELL EACH SIDE) BOTH RAMP CURBS TO BE PAINTED YELLOW, SEE PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATION BLACK 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR WHITE 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR CONT R A C T I O N JOINT CONT R A C T I O N JOINT7.5' MIN.BOLLARD PENALTY SIGN WITH WORDING AS REQUIRED BY STATE OR LOCAL LAW 6" DIA. SCH. 80 STEEL PIPE BOLLARD FILLED WITH CONCRETE. PAINT DARK BRONZE (TOP 12" PAINTED YELLOW) 4000 PSI CONCRETE 2'-6"6"2'-0"7'-0" TO BOTTOM OF LOWEST REQUIRED SIGN2"X2" SQUARE TUBING PAINT CONCRETE BLACK AFTER CURING AT ASPHALT LOCATIONS 3'-0"7'SIDEWALK WITH CURB & GUTTER SECTION NOT TO SCALE SIDEWALK ACCESSIBLE RAMP NOT TO SCALE DRIVE-THRU GRAPHICS NOT TO SCALE PAINTED ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL NOT TO SCALE STOP LINE GRAPHIC NOT TO SCALE DIRECTIONAL ARROW NOT TO SCALE RETURNED CURB ACCESSIBLE RAMP NOT TO SCALE DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE NOT TO SCALE CURB RAMP w/ FLARED SIDES NOT TO SCALE 6 C-4.0 1 C-4.0 2 C-4.0 3 C-4.0 4 C-4.0 7 C-4.0 12 C-4.0 9 C-4.08 C-4.0 TRUNCATED DOMES - CAST IN PLACE NOT TO SCALE 10 C-4.0 TYPICAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK NOT TO SCALE 11 C-4.0 11 C-4.0 STANDARD PARKING STALL NOT TO SCALE 5 C-4.0 NOTES: 1. JOINTS AT 5'-0" O.C. TOOLED 1 2" WIDE, 1" DEEP OR MAX. D 4 DEEP WHICHEVER IS GREATER. EXPANSION JOINTS AT 20' MAX. & ALL P.C.s, UNLESS APPROVED OR INDICATED OTHERWISE ON PLAN VIEW JOINT PATTERN. 5 C-4.0 5 C-4.0 5 C-4.0 5 C-4.0 5 C-4.0 17 C-4.1 11 C-4.0 11 C-4.0 11 C-4.0 17 C-4.1 11 C-4.0 11 C-4.011 C-4.0 5 C-4.0 6 C-4.0 17 C-4.1 4 C-4.0 20 C-4.1 7 C-4.0 30"30"ENTER DO NOT H DO NOT ENTER (REFER TO SIGN PACKAGE) 6'-0"6'-0"MATCH SIDEWALK WIDTH (3' MIN. RAMP) PAVEMENT7' MIN.1' MIN. TRANSITION 6"6"1V:14H MAX. 1' MIN. TRANSITION CURB CURB FLARED SIDES GRASSGRASS CURB RAMP w/ SHORT FLARED SIDES NOT TO SCALE 8A C-4.0 CONCRETE SIDEWALK MINIMUM 1% SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING. MAXIMUM 1.5% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS AT LANDING.12"6" 12"18.5"WHITE 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR ONLY IF REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL ORDINANCE (CIVIL ENGINEER TO VERIFY)3'x3'LANDING* SIDE FLARES TO BE 1:12 WHERE THERE IS NO LANDING AT TOP OF RAMP.3'x3'LANDINGNOTES 1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE AISLES SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.5% IN SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION. IF ONLY ONE ACCESS AISLE IS INSTALLED, IT IS TO BE A VAN SIZE. 2. PARKING STALL DIMENSIONING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE GOVERNING AUTHORITY'S AND ADA STANDARDS AND IF DIFFERENT THAN THIS DETAIL SHALL BE THE DIMENSIONING SHOWN ON THE SITE LAYOUT PLAN. 3. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO CHICK-FIL-A PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE 6" WIDE WHITE REFLECTIVE PAINT FOR STRIPING ON ASPHALT PARKING LOTS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE 6" WIDE YELLOW REFLECTIVE PAINT FOR STRIPING ON CONCRETE PARKING LOTS. 6. NO WHEEL STOPS TO BE INSTALLED WHEN PARKING IS ADJACENT TO SIDEWALK. 7. ADA SIGNS IN BOLLARDS AND BOLLARDS SHALL BE INSTALLED WHEN PARKING IS ADJACENT TO FLUSH CURB OR A RAMP. 5.0' pedestrian crosswalk Circle ONE WAY Right Turn Only Left Turn Only WHITE 'REFLECTIVE' LETTERS FACE: 3M REFLECTIVE COPY (#3272 RED)COLOR CIVIL TO VERIFY RAMP REQUIREMENTS BY STATE. AWNING AT E N T R Y D O O R S 1.5% M A X. GUTTER SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 5% AT LANDING AREA. Building For Drive -Thru Service 24" 7.0' MI N 7.0' MI N WHERE LANDING IS ADJACENT TO ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS, GUTTER SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.5% WHERE LANDING IS ADJACENT TO ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS, GUTTER SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.5% 12" **STANDARD PARKING STALL DEPTH FOR 90° PARKING SHALL BE 18' MINIMUM WHEN NOT IN THE SAME ROW AS 60° PARKING. 60° PARKING STALL CAN BE REDUCED TO 18' MINIMUM IF SITE CONDITIONS REQUIRE IT. 12.0' C A R THIS DOCUMENT IS "NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION" UNLESS THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL APPEAR BELOW. AA 003420 CA 8660 604 COURTLAND STREET SUITE 100 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32804 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING INTERIOR DESIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Stuart Anderson on 11/18/2019 using a digital signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. 3.E.e Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 6'-0" 24" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE FOR RADIUS PROTECTION SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 P.S.I. AT 28 DAYS. SUBBASE PREPARED AND COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM DENSITY OF 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR OR AS SPECIFIED BY A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SEE NOTE #1 RADIUS PROTECTION APRON SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM LENGTH AND WIDTH DIMENSIONS AS PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN. EXPANSION JOINTS AT 20' MAX. & ALL P.C.s, UNLESS APPROVED OR INDICATED OTHERWISE ON PLAN VIEW JOINT PATTERN. PAVEMENT DIMENSION REFER TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 5' MAX. SPACING REFUSE ENCLOSURE FOUNDATION PLAN (ALT) NOT TO SCALE 4-12"7" (3) 8" LAGS FOR CONCRETE PAVEMENT OR 12" GALVANIZED PLATED SPIKES FOR ASPHALT PAVEMENT REQUIRED FOR EACH WHEEL STOP. SEE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS FOR INSTALLATION. NOTES: 90° 90°2'R(TYP.)3.0' MIN.CROSS SECTION PLAN VIEW 3.0'12"REFUSE ENCLOSURE ALTERNATE DRAINAGE PLAN NOT TO SCALE SOLID PLASTIC WHEEL STOP NOT TO SCALE RAM P U P RAM P D N 12' 10' 10' 12' 6" PA V E M E N T C O N C R E T E CON C R E T E LAN DI N G CON C R E T E A R E A OF D RI V E T H R U CEN T E R LI N E 12' 1'-0" C R O S S S L O P E 2 % CJ CJ CJ CJ HEAD E R C U R B, VARI A B L E H EI G H T 12' - 6 " M I N . T O F A C E O F C U R B O R T O BUIL DI N G FAC E AS P H A L T PA V E M E N T 1'- 2 " CON C R E T E LAN DI N G 24" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CON C R E T E A R E A 0'-3" 1'-0"45°C.J.C.J.C.J.2.0%X-SLOPE10'-0" LANDING 12'-0" RAMP 12'-8"10'-0" LANDING 20'-0" 2'-0" CHAMFER C.J.6" HEADER CURB END 24" CURB AND GUTTER 6"Ø BOLLARD CONCRETE DRIVE-THRU LANE 1'-2" EL. = -2"EL. = -2" EL. = -2"EL. = -2" EL. = -8" EL. = -8" EL. = -2" NOTE: ALL ELEVATIONS ON THIS DETAIL ARE RELATIVE TO FFE = 0' 6" HEADER CURB 24" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 3" FACE OF CURB FACE OF BUILDING 12'-0" RAMP 15 C-4.1 19B C-4.1 19A C-4.1 6"° STEEL PIPE (SCHEDULE 80) FILLED WITH CONCRETE PAINT BOLLARD WITH DARK BRONZE TONE EXTERIOR ENAMEL PAINT AND PAINT TOP 12" YELLOW AT ALL LOCATIONS. ANCHOR STEEL PIPE IN CONCRETE FOOTING, 2'-0" DIAMETER x 2'-6" DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT APPLICATIONS CONCRETE PAVEMENT/ SLAB APPLICATIONS NOTE: BOLLARD HEIGHT SHALL BE 5'-0" AT DRIVE-THRU WINDOW AND INSIDE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE 2'-6"6"2'-0" TROWELED, ROUNDED CONCRETE CONCRETE BOLLARD NOT TO SCALE 20 C-4.1 ROLLOVER/MOUNTABLE CURB NOT TO SCALE 18 C-4.1 2" DRIV E- T H R U WI N D O W AGGREGATE BASE COURSE SEE NOTE #1. 1. MATERIAL: SOLID POLYETHYLENE 2. WHEEL STOP COLOR: YELLOW 3. MANUFACTURER - PLASTICS-R-UNIQUE, INC. 352 MILL STREET WADSWORTH, OH 44281 CONTACT - BOBBIE PERTIE 330-334-4820 PHONE 330-334-4720 FAX 4. USE ONLY MANUFACTURER SUPPLIED LAGS AND SPIKES 5. PRE-DRILL HOLES THROUGH PARKING SURFACES (3 4" BIT FOR LAGS AND 3 8" BIT FOR SPACES 6. FILL PRE-DRILLED HOLES WITH HEAVY DUTY CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE SUCH AS PL400 VARI A B L E H EI G H T HEAD E R C U R B, LIGHT BROOM FINISH NOTES: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. 2. EXPANSION JOINT FILLER SHALL BE FLEXIBLE, LIGHTWEIGHT, NON-STAINING, POLYETHYLENE, CLOSED-CELL EXPANSION JOINT NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. 6" HE A D E R CUR B SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR THICKNESS OF AGGREGATE UNDERNEATH PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER 17 C-4.1 EXPANSION JOINT 11 C-4.0 EXPANSION JOINT BOLL A R D 3'-0" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE3-12 MOUNTABLE DOME CURB NOTES #4's @ 12"O.C. EACH WAY (N.T.S.)8"3"12" LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION PROTECTOR NOT TO SCALE DRIVE-THRU ISOMETRIC NOT TO SCALE DRIVE-THRU PLAN NOT TO SCALE 16 C-4.1 14 C-4.1 13 C-4.1 17 C-4.1 20 C-4.1 11 C-4.0 17 C-4.1 20 C-4.1 1. PRE-CUT EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL SHALL BE USED IN ALL EXPANSION JOINTS. 2. DUMMY JOINTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT 10 ft. INTERVALS, MAXIMUM. 3.INSTALL EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 40 ft., MAXIMUM, AT ENDS OF RADIUS, AND A MINIMUM OF 5 ft. FROM INLET STRUCTURES. 4. BREAK AS NEEDED TO ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE 5. CONCRETE TO BE 3,000 P.S.I. 6. MOUNTABLE CURB TO BE PAINTED YELLOW WITH 6" BLACK STRIPE PAINTED EVERY 24" O.C.. REFUSE ENCLOSURE PLAN GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR LAYOUT OF CONCRETE LOADING PAD. 2.SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ELEVATIONS ON DUMPSTER PAD AND DRAINAGE OF INTERIOR TRASH ENCLOSURE. 3. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE ON APPROACH PAD AWAY FROM DUMPSTER. (SEE GRADING PLAN) 4. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS ON TRASH ENCLOSURE 5. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DRILL HOLES FOR GATE PINS IN BOTH THE OPEN AND CLOSED POSITION. +6" TOP OF SLAB NOTES: 1. ARCHITECT SHALL VERIFY SIZE & COORDINATE WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 2. RE: GRADING PLAN FOR DRAINAGE. 8" GATE POSTS FOUNDATION RE: CIVIL EDGE OF FOOTING BELOW PIPE BOLLARDS EMBED BOLLARDS IN 18" DIA. x 3'-6" CONCRETE FILLED HOLE 34'-0" 8" 12' 3 1/2"12' 3 1/2"8'-0" 3'-9"4'-0"9'-2"4'-0"4'-5" 8" 2'-0" TYP. 8" 8" 25'-4"6'-8"8" 8"8"8'-8"8"10'-0"6"2'-0" TYP. 8"8"2'-0"TYP.8"8"10'-0"SAW CUTRE: CIVIL13'-4"9"TYP.9" 3"3" CATCHING CURB AND GUTTER 11 2"R 1"6" 2'-0" PAVEMENT DIMENSION REFER TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE 1 2"R 6"13"6"SPILLING CURB AND GUTTER 11 2"R 1"6" 2'-0" PAVEMENT DIMENSION REFER TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE 1 2"R 6"12"7"1-1/8"BA LIGHT BROOM FINISH 1-1/8"SCREENED REFUSE ENCLOSURE FOUNDATION PLAN NOT TO SCALE 19 C-4.1 SAW JOINT 2'-0" TYP.2'-0"TYP.SAW JOINT EQUALEQUAL6" THICK 4000 PSI CONCRETE APPROACH PAD WITH #3's @ 12" ON CENTER EACH WAY 35'-0"IF INTERIOR DRAIN IS NOT REQUIRED, OMIT 8" BLOCK WIDTH AT FLOOR LEVEL, BOTH SIDES, FOR DRAINAGE OUTSIDE OF DUMPSTER AREA. 24" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER NOT TO SCALE 17 C-4.1 24"24"EQ TYP 4'-0" TYP EQ TYP EDGE OF SPREAD FOOTING BLOCK LEDGE SAW JOINT +6" TOP OF SLAB 0'-0" TOP OF SLAB 12'-101 2" 8"51 2" 34'-0"1'-0"2'-0"2'-0" TYP.EQUALEQUAL35'-0"EQUAL10'-0"10'-0"13' 6'-8"8"8" 13'8" 8" 51 2" 12'-101 2" IF INTERIOR DRAIN IS NOT REQUIRED, OMIT 8" BLOCK WIDTH AT FLOOR LEVEL BOTH SIDES, FOR DRAINAGE OUTSIDE OF DUMPSTER AREA.6'-3"RAMP1:12+6" TOP OF SLAB 6" THICK 4000 PSI CONCRETE APPROACH PAD WITH #3's @ 12" ON CENTER EACH WAY +6" TOP OF SLAB 8" GATE POSTS FOUNDATION RE: CIVIL EDGE OF FOOTING BELOW PIPE BOLLARDS EMBED BOLLARDS IN 18" DIA. x 3'-6" CONCRETE FILLED HOLE 34'-0" 8" 12' 3 1/2"12' 3 1/2"8'-0" 3'-9"4'-0"9'-2"4'-0"4'-5" 8" 2'-0" TYP. 8" 8" 25'-4"6'-8"8" 8"8"8'-8"8"10'-0"6"2'-0" TYP. 8"8"2'-0"TYP.8"8"10'-0"SAW CUTRE: CIVIL13'-4"9"TYP.9" 3"3" SAW JOINT 2'-0" TYP.2'-0"TYP.SAW JOINT EQUALEQUAL6" THICK 4000 PSI CONCRETE APPROACH PAD WITH #3's @ 12" ON CENTER EACH WAY 35'-0"CONNECT FLOOR DRAIN TO STORM DRAIN SYSTEM, PER LOCAL REQUIREMENTS NOTE: WHEEL STOPS ONLY TO BE USED WHEN NO OTHER PRACTICAL OPTION EXISTS 1. CONCRETE FOR CURBING SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 P.S.I. AT 28 DAYS. 2. CONSTRUCTION STAKING FOR CURBING INSTALLATION SHALL BE REFERENCED (CUT OR FILL) TO THE TOP OF CURB 4. CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 10'-0" O.C. TOOLED 1/4" (±1/16",-0) WIDE, 1" OR MAX. D/4 DEEP WHICHEVER IS GREATER. EXPANSION JOINTS AT 40' MAX. AND ALL P.C.'s, UNLESS APPROVED OR INDICATED OTHERWISE ON PLAN VIEW JOINT PATTERN. 3. AT CONTRACTOR'S OPTION THE GUTTER THICKNESS MAY BE INCREASED AT THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO MAKE BOTTOM OF GUTTER PARALLEL WITH PAVING OF BASE COURSE. DEPRESSED SPILLING CURB AND GUTTER 11 2"R 7" PAVEMENT DIMENSION REFER TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE 1 2"R C 6" DEPRESSED CATCHING CURB AND GUTTER 11 2"R 7" 2'-0" PAVEMENT DIMENSION REFER TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE 1 2"R 7 1/2"D LIGHT BROOM FINISH 6"3/4"2'-0"6"LIGHT BROOM FINISH 5.0% MAX.3/4"5.0% MAX. 3 4" PER FT. 3 4" PER FT. TH E E D G E O F P A V E M E N T W I T H N O C U R B (S E E C I V I L P L A N F O R D I M E N S I O N S ) CONCRETE CONCRETE (TO F A C E O F BOLL A R D) LIGHT BROOM FINISH 1:20 MAX. SLOPE 1:14 MAX. SLOPE ROADWAY GUTTER PAN DEPRESSED CURB CURB RAMP CATCHING GUTTER SECTION AT ACCESSIBLE RAMPE 1:20 MAX. SLOPE 1:14 MAX. SLOPE ROADWAY GUTTER PAN CURB RAMP SPILLING GUTTER SECTION AT ACCESSIBLE RAMPE BAC K O F C U R B I S 2"IN FR O N T O F F A C E O F DRIV E- T H R U WI N D O W NOTES: NOTES: 1. ARCHITECT SHALL VERIFY SIZE & COORDINATE WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 2. RE: GRADING PLAN FOR DRAINAGE. THIS DOCUMENT IS "NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION" UNLESS THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL APPEAR BELOW. AA 003420 CA 8660 604 COURTLAND STREET SUITE 100 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32804 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING INTERIOR DESIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Stuart Anderson on 11/18/2019 using a digital signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. 3.E.e Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) * * * * * * * * * * * 1'-0" 60" MIN LANDING HORIZONTAL PROJECTION (RUN) 60" MINIMUM LANDING 1'-0"34"-38"HANDRAIL 36" CLEAR (MIN) "A" "B" RAMPS AND HANDRAILS TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 405 & 505 OF THE 2010 ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN. ELEVATION 30" MAX. RISE BEFORE A 5'-0" LONG INTERMEDIATE LANDING IS REQUIRED SET PIPE IN CONC. FOOTING DETAIL "A" DETAIL "B" 11 4‚72 1 2‚ HANDRAIL34"-38"A.F.F.8" SQUARE 3"MIN1'-0"VERIFYHANDRAIL 12" "ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY WITH 405" "THE LEAST POSSIBLE SLOPE SHALL BE USED FOR ANY RAMP." "THE MINIMUM CLEAR WIDTH OF A RAMP SHALL BE 36"." MAXIMUM SLOPE FOR A RAMP SHALL BE 1:12. RISE FOR ANY RAMP RUN SHALL 30" MAXIMUM. RAMPS SECTION 405 SECTION 405.7LANDINGS HANDRAILS SECTION 505 LEVEL LANDINGS WILL BE PROVIDED AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF EACH RAMP. LANDING LENGTH SHALL BE MIN. 60" AND BE AS WIDE AS RAMP MIN. 36". IF RAMP CHANGES DIRECTION LANDING WILL BE MIN. 60"x60" "IF A DOORWAY IS LOCATED AT A LANDING, THEN THE AREA IN FRONT OR THE DOORWAY SHALL COMPLY WITH 404.2.4 AND 404.3.2 "IF A RAMP HAS A SLOPE GREATER THAN 5% AND A RISE GREATER THAN 6" OR A HORIZONTAL PROJECTION GREATER THAN 72", THEN IT SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS ON BOTH SIDES" HANDRAIL WILL BE CONSTRUCTED OF WELDED STEEL PIPE - GRIND SMOOTH AND PAINT TO MATCH DARK BRONZE. SECTION 405.3CROSS SLOPE THE CROSS SLOPE OF RAMP SURFACES SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 1:50. NOWHERE SHALL THE CROSS SLOPE OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE EXCEED 1:50. SUBBASE SEE NOTE #1 SEE PLAN FOR SLAB THICKNESS 4000 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CONCRETE 1 4" WIDE SAWED OR PREMOLDED JOINT, 12' MAX. SPACING, SEAL JOINTS WITH POLYURETHANE SEALANT TO WITHIN 1 4" FROM TOP. PROPOSED PAVING EXISTING PAVING 3 4" GRADE A36 STEEL DOWEL 14" LENGTH, 12" O.C. SPACING, GREASE OR SLEEVE ONE END SUBBASE SEE NOTE #1 DOWELED CONSTRUCTION JOINTSEE PLAN FOR SLAB THICKNESS 4000 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CONCRETE SUBBASE SEE NOTE #1 6"x6"x6 GAUGE WELDED WIRE FABRIC SEATED AND SECURED ON STANDS 4000 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CONCRETE MIX PER SPECIFICATION.6"2"XXXX EXTEND BASE 6" BEYOND FOR APPLICATIONS WITHOUT CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, BUILDINGS OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 2.5" THICK ASPHALTIC CONCRETE BINDER COURSE 1.5" THICK ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE 6" THICK AGGREGATE BASE COURSE IF PRESENT ON-SITE, UNSUITABLE SUBGRADE MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACED WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. VERTICAL SAW CUT 3 8" (MIN.) URETHANE JOINT SEALING COMPOUND DOWEL SPACED ON TWO (2) FOOT CENTER TO CENTER, 6 INCHES OFF TIE BARS. EXISTING PAVING PAVING PROPOSED PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVING EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT AND BASE COURSE CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT, REMOVE AND REPLACE 2' OF EX. ASPHALT PAVEMENT TO CONSTRUCT KEY JOINT. VERTICAL SAW CUT 3 8" WIDE (MIN.) 11 4" MIN. CLEARANCE DOWEL SLEEVE (CLOSED END) TO FIT DOWEL AND BE SECURED. TO BE INSTALLED 1'-0" C.C.DDD424" LUBRICATED NO. 8 SMOOTH DOWEL 2" (MIN.) URETHANE JOINT SEALING COMPOUND (TOP 1 4" NO SEALING COMPOUND)5" TYPICAL (SEE GEOTECHREPORT FORRECOMMENDATIONS12 DEPTHT4#3 BARS ON 18" CTRS. BOTH WAYS 24" LUBRICATED SMOOTH NO. 8 DOWEL BAR 1'-3" MIN.14TTOP 1 4" NO SEALING COMPOUND SAWCUT FULL DEPTH & CURB & GUTTER 9"-15" 2' REMOVAL ZONE EXPANSION JOINT NOT TO SCALERISE31 C-4.25" TYPICAL (SEE GEOTECHREPORT FORRECOMMENDATIONS5" TYPICAL (SEE GEOTECHREPORT FORRECOMMENDATIONS12 DEPTH5" TYPICAL (SEE GEOTECHREPORT FORRECOMMENDATIONS12 DEPTH4" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE SEE NOTE #1. PAINT HANDRAIL DARK BRONZE SAWCUT LINE NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE SITE SPECIFIC GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT, AGGREGATE, AND SUBGRADE SECTION REQUIREMENTS. 2. MINIMUM PAVEMENT THICKNESS SHOULD BE 6" GRADED AGGREGATE BASE, 2.5"ASPHALT PAVEMENT BINDER & 1.5" ASPHALT PAVEMENT SURFACE COURSE TACK COAT. NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. 2. MINIMUM PAVEMENT THICKNESS SHALL BE 6" CONCRETE, 4" AGGREGATE BASE NOTES: 1. NO. 5 SMOOTH DOWEL BAR MAY BE USED IN 5 INCH AND 6 INCH PAVEMENT THICKNESS. 2. LONGITUDINAL BUTT CONSTRUCTION MAY BE UTILIZED IN PLACE OF LONGITUDINAL HINGED (KEYWAY) JOINT AT CONTRACTORS OPTION. 3. DOWEL BARS SHALL BE DRILLED & EPOXIED INTO PAVEMENT HORIZONTALLY BY USE OF MECHANICAL EQUIP. 4. PUSHING DOWEL BARS INTO WET CONCRETE NOT ACCEPTABLE. NOTES: 1. NO. 5 SMOOTH DOWEL BAR MAY BE USED IN 5 INCH AND 6 INCH PAVEMENT THICKNESS. 2. LONGITUDINAL BUTT CONSTRUCTION MAY BE UTILIZED IN PLACE OF LONGITUDINAL HINGED (KEYWAY) JOINT AT CONTRACTORS OPTION. 3. DOWEL BARS SHALL BE DRILLED INTO PAVEMENT HORIZONTALLY BY USE OF A MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. 4. DRILLING BY HAND IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, PUSHING DOWEL BARS INTO WET CONCRETE NOT ACCEPTABLE. 5. JOINT SPACING TO BE 24'X24' (EVERY OTHER JOINT) #3 BARS ON 16" ON CENTER EACH WAY 4:1 SLOPE NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. 0.1" #3 BARS ON 16" ON CENTER EACH WAY LUBRICATE THIS ENDLUBRICATEEPOXY34"-38"THESE DETAILS APPLY TO CONCRETE PAVED LOTS NOTE: 1. USE ONLY COMMERCIAL GRADE ALUMINUM FENCING WITH DARK BRONZE POWDER COAT FINISH XXX XXX SUBBASE SEE NOTE #1 1 2" DECK-O-FOAM EXPANSION JOINT FILLER W/ PRE-SCORED STRIP OR OTHER CFA APPROVED MATERIAL URETHANE JOINT SEALING COMPOUND 14TNOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. SUBBASE SEE NOTE #1 TYPICAL ADA RAMP AND HANDRAIL NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL ASPHLT SECTION NOT TO SCALE TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CONTRACTION JOINT NOT TO SCALE TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL DOWELED CONSTRUCTION JOINT NOT TO SCALE CONCRETE PAVING DRIVE-THRU LANE NOT TO SCALE LONGITUDINAL BUTT JOINT NOT TO SCALE KEYED CONSTRUCTION JOINT NOT TO SCALE CONTRACTION JOINT NOT TO SCALE 21 C-4.2 22 C-4.2 23 C-4.2 25 C-4.2 27 C-4.2 28 C-4.2 29 C-4.2 30 C-4.2 TACK COAT (APPLICATION RATE PER LOCAL D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS) NOTES: 1. JOINT SPACING TO BE 12' x 12' WITH EVERY OTHER JOINT BEING AN EXPANSION JOINT. NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. ASPHALT PAVEMENT AND BASE COURSE #4 REBAR FOR CONTINUOUS REINFORCEMENT OF THICKENED EDGE 6" SUBBASE SEE NOTE #1 #3 @ 12" ON CENTER EACH WAY 4000 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CONCRETE 12"6"MIN.6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE SEE NOTE #1. __"PAVEMENT THICKNESS CONCRETE APRON @ TRASH ENCLOSURE NOT TO SCALE 24 C-4.2 10" MINASPHALT PAVEMENT AND BASE COURSE _" PAVEMENT THICKNESS SEE NOTE #1 12"10" MINNOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. PAVEMENT EDGE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 21A C-4.2 REQUIRED AT ALL JUNCTIONS WITH CONCRETE 9"27" MAX.27" MAX.NOTE: VERIFY ALL STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR RAMPS BUTT JOINT NOT TO SCALE 23A C-4.2 SAWCUT EXISTING ASPHALT FULL DEPTH FOR CLEAN CONSTRUCTION JOINT PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT JOINT SEALANT (AC-20, OR EQUIVALENT)< 4"AND HANDRAILS.2"URETHANE JOINT SEALING COMPOUND SUBBASE SEE NOTE #1 4000 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CONCRETE MIX PER SPECIFICATION.6"4" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE SEE NOTE #1. CONCRETE PAVING PARKING LOT NOT TO SCALE 26A C-4.2 2"#3 @ 12" ON CENTER EACH WAY NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. 2. MINIMUM PAVEMENT THICKNESS SHALL BE 6" CONCRETE, 4" AGGREGATE BASE 42"43" 685 8" GRADE 411 16" SPACING NOTE: 1. CIVIL TO COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT (FULL DETAIL PROVIDED IN ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALUMINUM HANDRAIL NOT TO SCALE 26 C-6 THIS DOCUMENT IS "NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION" UNLESS THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL APPEAR BELOW. AA 003420 CA 8660 604 COURTLAND STREET SUITE 100 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32804 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING INTERIOR DESIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Stuart Anderson on 11/18/2019 using a digital signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. 3.E.e Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) PAINT SOLID MULTI-LANE SPLIT MULTI-LANE MERGE 6" PIPE BOLLARD FILLED w. CONCRETE PAINTED DARK BRONZE WITH TOP 12" PAINTED YELLOW 6" 6" PAINT 2" TOP OF CURB YELLOW PAINT FACE OF CURB YELLOW16"CANOPY ABOVE MENU BOARD ISLAND CURB ELEVATION3'-0"8'-0" ISLAND CURB PLAN5'1.5'2.5'5'1.5'2.5'PAINT SOLID MULTI-LANE DIRECTIONAL GRAPHICS NOT TO SCALE 32 C-4.3 NOTES: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO CHICK-FIL-A PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS, SEE DETAIL 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHITE REFLECTIVE PAINT ON ASPHALT & YELLOW REFLECTIVE PAINT ON CONCRETE. 5 C-4.0 20 C-4.1 DRIVE THRU ORDER POINT ISLAND CURB NOT TO SCALE 34 C-4.3 12 - 18"3'3'3'7.5'LOOP 1.5 x 5 FEET 9' - 9.5' MENU BOARD LOOP DETECTION SYSTEM NOT TO SCALE 35 C-4.3 MENU BOARD MICROPHONE SPEAKER DRIV E T H R U L A N E CON C R E T E P A VI N G 1 2 2 5 3 4 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PREFAB (FOLDED) LOOP (1.5' x 5') 1/2" PVC COUPLING 1/2" PVC SLEEVE COUPLING 1/2" PVC TUBING (3' LENGTH) 1/2" PVC CORNER FITTING 1/2" PVC 90° ELBOW 1/2" PVC TUBING (2' LENGTH) PARTS LIST NOTES: 1. LOOP DETECTOR IS MODEL NO. VDL100 VEHICLE DETECTION LOOP MANUFACTURED BY MH ELECTRONICS, INC. 2.FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INSTALLATION. CONDUIT FROM BUILDING MENU BOARD FOUNDATION MENU BOARD LOOP SUPPORT VEHICLE LOOP DETECTOR DRIVE THRU LANE CONCRETE PAVING 2" CLEAR BETWEEN LOOP AND SURFACE PLAN VIEW SECTION VIEW ISOMETRIC VIEW 3' CLEAR PERIMETER, FREE FROM REBAR, WIRE SCREEN, REINFORCING BARS, ELECTRIC CABLE OR METAL OBJECTS. 1 4 2 5 CROSSWALK DETAIL NOT TO SCALE60°5'3' 8" WHITE 4" WHITE 1. REFER TO PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATION NOTES: 33 C-4.3 1% MINIMUM SLOPE STORM SEWER PIPE (SIZE VARIES) SEE GRADING PLAN FOR LOCATION SEE NOTE #2 SEE NOTE #1 45° BEND (SCH 40 PVC) 2" MAXIMUM DOWNSPOUT 1. FOR ALL DEPTHS OF COVER LESS THAN TWO (2) FEET, PIPE MUST BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC. FOR DEPTHS OF COVER GREATER THAN TWO (2) FEET, FLEXIBLE PIPE MAY BE USED. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALLOWABLE PIPE TYPES. 2.A WATERTIGHT CONNECTION SHALL BE MAINTAINED WITH ANY TRANSITION FROM SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE TO ANY OTHER PIPE TYPE. 3. THE DOWNSPOUT COLLECTOR DRAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE DOWNSPOUTS ARE INSTALLED ON THE BUILDING. SITEWORK CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK INCLUDING THE RODENT SCREEN. BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONNECTION AT THE POINT OF THE RODENT SCREEN. TOP/SLAB (SEE FDN. PLAN) MAX. 1.5% SLOPE NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR HAS THE OPTION TO DRILL, SET AND EPOXY GROUT DOWEL, IF NOT INSTALLED WHEN THE BUILDING SLAB WAS POURED. 2. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DOOR LOCATIONS. DOOR STOOP SHALL EXTEND 12" PAST EACH SIDE OF DOOR MIN. STOOP IS TO BE SEPARATED ON ALL SIDES WITH 1/4" EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL, TOPPED WITH SEALANT. 3. USE A 10'X5' SLAB MINIMUM AT A DOUBLE DOOR ENTRY. 4. USE A 5'X5' SLAB MINIMUM AT A SINGLE DOOR ENTRY. 5. DOWELS TO BE INSTALLED INTO THE BUILDING FOUNDATION ONLY. THE REMAINING THREE SIDES OF THE SLAB DO NOT GET TIED TO THE SURROUNDING SIDEWALK. 5'-0" MIN.4"U.N.O.2" BLDG. LINE PCC SIDEWALK IF REQUIRED SEE FDN. PLAN FOR WALL REINF. ENTRY DOOR FROST SLAB DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 36 C-4.3 MATCH SIDEWALK SECTION FOR CONCRETE (4" MIN.) 2" XPS RIGID FOAM INSULATION MATCH SIDEWALK SECTION FOR AGGREGATE BASE (4" MIN.) PREPARED AND COMPACTED SUBGRADE XXXX 6" MIN. X X 6"x6"x6 GAUGE WELDED WIRE FABRIC SEATED AND SECURED ON STANDS 1/4" EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL11 C-4.0 PRE-CAST CATCH BASIN PER D.O.T. HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC RATING. CONFORMING TO ASTM C478 WASHED STONE FABRIC OR EQUAL NON-WOVEN FILTER MIRAFI 140N PIPING IS FREE OF C.O. COVER SUCH THAT LOADING IS NOT TRANSMITTED TO PIPING. COMBINATION, TYP. SANITARY 12" THICK CONCRETE PAD CLEAN OUT AND COVER, P-15, PRIME AND PAINT FLAT BLACK. cl SAN. C.O. OUTSIDE BUILDING37 C-4.3 NOTES: TYPICAL SECTION AT MANHOLE AROUND TRANSITION TYP. ALL 3'-0" TRANSITION TYP. ALL AROUND 3'-0" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE ASPHALT PAVEMENT AGGREGATE BASE COURSE FLUSH ASPHALT PAVEMENT FLUSH WASHED STONE ALL AROUND NON-WOVEN FILTER FABRIC 1" DIA. WEEPHOLE (4 REQ'D.) 5 C-4.0 BUILDING DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 38 C-4.3 NOTES: STORM WEEP HOLE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 40 C-4.3 TYPICAL SECTION AT INLET/CATCH BASIN DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 39 C-4.3 TYPICAL SECTION AT INLET/CATCH BASIN CJ CJC J C J EJ EJEJ EJ6'12' CONCRETE SLAB POURED WITH ISLAND RESUME TYP. CJ PATTERN RESUME TYP. CJ PATTERN EXTEND CJ THROUGH CURB (TYP.) ASPHALT PAVING SECTION. SEE 21 C-4.2 CJ = CONTRACTION JOINT EJ = EXPANSION JOINT 8"8" REQUIRED AT ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES NOTE: 1" DIA. WEEPHOLE (4 REQ'D.) (3 REQ'D. AT CURB INLETS) 2. CROSSWALK ALONG AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL MAINTAIN A CROSS SLOPE OF 1.5% MAX AND A RUNNING SLOPE OF 5% MAX. 6" SCHEDULE 40 PVC WITH PVC BOOT ADAPTER DOWNSPOUT COVER PAINTED TO MATCH 4. IF NECESSARY, ADJUST FOOTING TO ALLOW DOWNSPOUT TO BE INSTALLED TIGHT AGAINST BUILDING VEHICULAR FLOW DIRECTION OF 1. SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR GREASE TRAP DETAIL 2. CLEAN OUT COVERS SHALL BE PROVIDEDED ON ALL CLEANOUTS REGARDLESS OF LOCATION. 3. CONCRETE COLLAR ALSO REQUIRED FOR SINGLE CLEANOUTS IN PAVEMENT 1/2" DIA DOWEL @ 2'-0" ON CENTER 6" MIN. DOWEL TO BE SET AT TIME OF BUILDING SLAB POUR OR DRILL, SET, EPOXY GROUT DOWEL INTO EXISTING SLAB ALIGN EDGE OF SLAB TO CLOSEST JOINT OR BACK OF CURB 20"4"4"4'-0"4'-0" REAR 18"THIS DOCUMENT IS "NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION" UNLESS THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL APPEAR BELOW. AA 003420 CA 8660 604 COURTLAND STREET SUITE 100 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32804 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING INTERIOR DESIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Stuart Anderson on 11/18/2019 using a digital signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. 3.E.e Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3 GREASE INTERCEPTOR 4 GREASE INTERCEPTOR TABLES2PROPERTY LINE CLEANOUT1BACKFILL-PAVED ROADWAYS 5 DROP CLEANOUT 6 SEWER CLEAN-OUT NON PAVED AREAS NTS THIS DOCUMENT IS "NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION" UNLESS THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL APPEAR BELOW. AA 003420 CA 8660 604 COURTLAND STREET SUITE 100 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32804 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING INTERIOR DESIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Stuart Anderson on 11/18/2019 using a digital signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. 3.E.e Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) LEGEND PLAN NOTES UTILITY TESTING AND DISINFECTING NOTES 1" = 20' TREE CHART 1 - 13" PALM 2 - 14" PALM 3 - 7" OAK 4 - 10" OAK 5 - 6" OAK 6 - 10" OAK 7 - 8" OAK 8 - 2-3" MAGNOLIA 9 - 10" OAK 10 - 4" MAGNOLIA 11 - 10" OAK 12 - 9" OAK 13 - 10" OAK 14 - 4" MAGNOLIA 15 - 11" PALM 16 - 9" PALM 17 - 14" PALM 18 - 6" OAK 19 - 10" PALM 20 - 11" PALM 21 - 6" OAK 22 - 6" OAK 23 - 11" PALM 24 - 10" PALM 25 - 13" PALM 26 - 13" PALM 27 - 9" PALM 28 - 6" OAK 29 - 4" MAGNOLIA 30 - 7" UNIDENTIFIED 31 - 6" UNIDENTIFIED 32 - 8" UNIDENTIFIED 33 - 7" UNIDENTIFIED 34 - 7" UNIDENTIFIED 35 - 11" PALM 36 - 11" PALM 37 - 13" PALM 38 - 6" UNIDENTIFIED 39 - 6" UNIDENTIFIED TV C O SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 11.91 SET BENCHMARK N&D 2 NAVD 88 SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 12.27 N&D LB #1772 4 NAVD 88 SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 12.06 N&D LB #1772 5 NAVD 88 3A 3B 1 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 7 271 FT. 9 CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL "SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL" 1-800-432-4770 A MINIMUM OF 2-DAYS AND A MAXIMUM OF 5-DAYS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT IS "NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION" UNLESS THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL APPEAR BELOW. AA 003420 CA 8660 604 COURTLAND STREET SUITE 100 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32804 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING INTERIOR DESIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Stuart Anderson on 11/18/2019 using a digital signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. 3.E.e Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) SITE ELECTRICAL / PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1" = 20' Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Lum. Lumens Lum. Watts LLF Description 8 A SINGLE 18935 163 0.900 PRV-A60-D-UNV-T4-SA-BZ / EXISTING 25' ROUND TAPERED POLE Calculation Summary Label Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min EXTENDED 1.70 5.0 0.0 N.A.N.A. PARKING LOT & DRIVE-THRU SURFACE 2.65 5.0 1.2 2.21 4.17 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 2.1 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.1 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.6 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.4 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.8 3.1 3.5 3.7 3.3 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.9 3.3 3.3 2.9 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.9 3.2 3.1 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.1 3.6 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.8 2.3 2.6 2.8 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.5 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.9 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.9 3.4 3.5 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.5 1.9 1.2 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.4 2.2 2.8 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.8 3.1 3.0 2.3 1.3 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.5 2.5 3.3 3.5 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.2 2.4 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.5 2.6 3.5 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.9 2.7 1.8 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.8 2.8 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 2.8 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.1 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.1 2.2 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.7 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.3 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.1 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.2 2.2 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.4 3.7 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.7 2.4 2.2 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.0 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.0 2.2 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.2 2.3 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.2 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.1 3.0 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.1 2.3 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.3 2.5 3.5 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.3 3.0 2.9 2.6 2.3 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.0 2.1 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.3 2.3 3.5 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.4 2.0 1.4 1.6 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.4 3.7 3.1 2.0 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.2 2.2 3.6 4.6 4.5 4.1 3.8 3.4 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.7 3.8 3.2 2.1 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.1 2.3 3.9 4.9 5.0 4.3 3.8 3.3 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.0 2.1 1.2 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.1 2.3 3.9 5.0 5.0 4.3 3.7 3.3 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.2 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.6 3.0 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.0 2.2 1.3 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.2 2.3 3.7 4.7 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.2 1.8 0.5 1.4 1.8 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.9 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.1 2.2 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.3 2.4 3.5 4.1 3.9 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.3 1.8 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.9 3.1 3.6 3.8 3.3 2.1 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.3 2.5 3.6 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.4 2.0 1.3 1.1 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.6 3.2 2.1 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.3 2.4 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.6 3.3 3.1 2.8 2.5 2.1 1.9 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.1 2.3 1.3 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.3 2.3 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.7 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.7 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.9 3.0 2.5 1.4 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.3 2.4 3.3 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.7 3.4 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.9 2.5 1.3 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.2 2.1 3.1 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.0 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.4 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.5 1.3 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.8 2.9 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.2 2.8 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.4 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.6 2.8 3.6 3.8 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.0 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.7 2.5 3.2 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.1 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 3.1 2.8 1.8 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.5 2.2 2.7 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.6 2.9 2.6 1.7 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.3 1.9 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.1 1.5 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.6 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 3.7 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 3.2 3.4 3.1 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.8 3.2 3.1 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 3.2 3.2 2.9 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.6 3.0 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 2.8 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 LIGHT LEVELS ARE MAINTAINED FOOT-CANDLES, INITIAL LEVELS ARE SLIGHTLY HIGHER ALL FIXTURES ARE NEW ALL POLES ARE EXISTING FIXTURES ARE 163W 4000K LED POLES ARE 25'-0" FOR AN OVERALL FIXTURE HEIGHT OF 26'-6" A.F.G. TV SITE BENCHMARK ELEVATION = DATUM = 11.91 SET BENCHMARK N NAVD 88 SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 12.27 N&D LB #1772 4 NAVD 88 SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 12.06 N&D LB #1772 5 NAVD 88 THIS DOCUMENT IS "NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION" UNLESS THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL APPEAR BELOW. AA 003420 CA 8660 604 COURTLAND STREET SUITE 100 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32804 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING INTERIOR DESIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Stuart Anderson on 11/18/2019 using a digital signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. 3.E.e Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS A.BUFFER REQUIRED 1.East Type "D" Airport Rd 175 LF @ 1 tree/30 LF =5.8 or 6 trees; Plus double row of shrubs North Shared Type "A"261 LF-21 LF drive= 240 LF @ 1 tree/30 LF =8 trees North Buffer area = 240 x 7.5 =1800 SF West Type "D"175 LF-68 LF drives= 107 LF @ 1 tree/30 LF =3.6 or 4 trees; Plus double row of shrubs South Type "D"255 LF @ 1 tree/30 LF =8.5 or 9 trees; Plus double row of shrubs PROVIDED 1.East Type "D" Airport Rd 6 Ex Black Olive (6,7,9,11,12,13)Row of Cocoplum added to ex shrubs North Shared Type "A"Deviation allows for planting of buffer in other areas on site. 3 Ex Mags (8,10,14) on East Buffer, 3 Pigeon Plums, 1 Maple (west buffer, rear of bldg), 1 Maple (SE corner)=8 trees North Buffer Deviation Area =654 SF West Type "D"1 Ex Mag (29), 1 Ex Oak (28), 2 Dahoon Holly counts as 1 (21,22), 2 Ex Palm(20,23)+New Palm counts as 1 = 4 Trees Row of Cocoplum added to ex shrubs South Type "D"3 Ex Oak (3,4,18), 3 Maple, 3 Oak = 9 Trees Row of Cocoplum added to ex shrubs South Buffer Deviation Area =125 SF Total Deviation North and South =779 SF Compensation provided for Deviation in other areas (shown in purple)=489 SF 290 SF Deficit B.INTERIOR VUA REQUIRED 1.VUA = 26180 SF; Interior LS area = 10% of VUA =2618 SF 2.1 Tree/250 SF of Interior LS area =10 Trees PROVIDED 1.2620 SF interior landscape areas provided (see green shaded area) 2.2 Ex Palms (1,2) + 1 Palm counts as 1 tree, 7 Maple, 2 Pigeon Plum =10 Trees total C.BUILDING FOUNDATION REQUIRED 1.25 % of the combined total of all building façade length × (Width) 10' wide = (Area) Total Planting Area Required. 325 LF x 10' x 25%=812.5 SF 2.Trees and Palms @ 1/300 SF of required foundation planting =2.7 or 3 Trees or Palms PROVIDED 1.821 SF foundation landscape areas provided (see yellow shaded area) 2.Palm counts as 1, 2 Simpson Stopper =3 Trees PermitPermit Information contained on this drawing and in all digital files produced for above named project may not be reproduced in any manner without express written or verbal consent from authorized project representatives. MLD PROJECT # PRINTED FOR DATE SHEET SHEET NUMBER DRAWN BY Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 REVISION SCHEDULE FSU#CHICK-FIL-A2018153 9.7.18 ADNNaples Center FSU5825 Airport Pulling Rd NNaples, FL 341091721 NO.DATE DESCRIPTION Landscape Plan L-100 1 10/15/18 Site Plan Changes 2 1/16/19 City Comments 3 3/8/19 Client Comments 4 3/15/19 Site Plan Changes 5 3/21/19 Site Plan Changes 6 5/29/19 City Comments 7 7/3/19 City Comments 8 11/14/19 City Comments 0 20 40 FT PLANT LIST Qty Botanical Name Common Name Scheduled Size Remarks Trees 12 Acer rubrum 'Florida Flame'Florida Flame Red Maple 2" Cal.; 10'-12' Hgt B & B 5 Coccoloba diversifolia Pigeon Plum 2" Cal.; 10'-12' Hgt Container 12 Myrcianthes fragrans Simpson Stopper 6'-7' Hgt 3 Quercus virginiana 'SDLN'Cathedral Live Oak 3" Cal.; 12-14'Hgt.B & B 6 Sabal palmetto Cabbage Palm 10'-16' CT Shrubs 13 Buxus microphylla Japanese Boxwood 3 Gal. 92 Chrysobalanus icaco Coco Plum 3 Gal. 6 Illicium floridanum Florida Anise 3 Gal.; 24" Hgt 5 Ixora coccinea Ixora 3 Gal. 14 Plumbago auriculata 'Imperial Blue'Imperial Blue Plumbago 3 Gal. 36 Zamia pumila Coontie 3 Gal. Groundcovers 119 Dianella tasmanica 'Blueberry'Blueberry Flax Lily 1 Gal. 12 Trachelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine 3 Gal.; 4' Runner Tie/train leaders to trellis 112 Match Existing Sod Match Existing Sod SF; SodDEVIATION IN BUFFER AREA COMPENSATION TOTAL 489 SF X EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN LEGEND TREE PROTECTION FENCING INTERIOR VUA LANDSCAPE AREA 2620 SF BUILDING FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE AREA 822 SF ORANGE SHADED TREES ARE REPLACEMENT TREES FOR TREES REMOVED DUE TO NORTH BUFFER DEVIATION #1 DEVIATION #1 NORTH BUFFER AREA ENCROACHMENT 654 SF EXISTING BUFFER TO REMAIN DEVIATION #2 SOUTH BUFFER AREA ENCROACHMENT 125 SF SOUTHEAST 1.Landscape Contractor to read and understand the Landscape Specifications (sheet L-102) prior to finalizing bids. The Landscape Specifications shall be adhered to throughout the construction process. 2.Contractor is responsible for locating and protecting all underground utilities prior to digging. 3.Contractor is responsible for protecting existing trees from damage during construction. 4.All tree protection devices to be installed prior to the start of land disturbance, and maintained until final landscaping. 5.All tree protection areas to be protected from sedimentation. 6.All tree protection fencing to be inspected daily, and repaired or replaced as needed. 7.No parking, storage or other construction activities are to occur within tree protection areas. 8.All new planting areas shall be cleaned of construction debris (ie. concrete, rock, rubble, building materials, etc) prior to adding and spreading of the topsoil. 9.General Contractor is responsible for adding a min of 4” clean friable topsoil in all planting beds and all grassed areas. Graded areas to be held down the appropriate elevation to account for topsoil depth. See Landscape Specifications for required topsoil characteristics. 10.In all parking lot islands, the General Contractor is responsible to remove all debris, fracture/loosen subgrade to a min. 24” depth. Add topsoil to a 6”-8” bermed height above island curbing; refer to landscape specifications and landscape island detail. 11.Prior to beginning work, the Landscape Contractor shall inspect the subgrade, general site conditions, verify elevations, utility locations, irrigation, approve topsoil provided by the General Contractor and observe the site conditions under which the work is to be done. Notify the General Contractor of any unsatisfactory conditions, work shall not proceed until such conditions have been corrected and are acceptable to the Landscape Contractor. 12.Any deviations from the approved set of plans are to be approved by the Landscape Architect. 13.Landscaping shall be installed in conformance with ANSI Z60.1 the “American Standard for Nursery Stock” and the accepted standards of the American Association of Nurserymen. 14.Existing grass in proposed planting areas shall be killed and removed. Hand rake to remove all rocks and debris larger than 1 inch in diameter, prior to adding topsoil and planting shrubs. 15.Soil to be tested to determine fertilizer and lime requirements prior to laying sod. 16.Annual and perennial beds: add min. 4 inch layer of organic material and till to a min. depth of 12 inches. Mulch annual and perennial beds with 2-3 inch depth of mini nuggets. 17.All shrubs beds (existing and new) to be mulched with a min. 3 inch layer of mulch (double shredded hardwood mulch). 18.Planting holes to be dug a minimum of twice the width of the root ball, for both shrub and tree. Set plant material 2-3” above finish grade. Backfill planting pit with topsoil and native excavated soil. 19.Sod to be delivered fresh (Cut less than 24 hours prior to arriving on site), laid immediately, rolled, and watered thoroughly immediately after planting. Edge of sod at planting beds are to be "V" trenched; see Landscape Details. 20.Any existing grass disturbed during construction to be fully removed, regraded and replaced. All tire marks and indentions to be repaired. 21.Water thoroughly twice in first 24 hours and apply mulch immediately. 22.The Landscape Contractor shall guarantee all plants installed for one full year from date of acceptance by the owner. All plants shall be alive and at a vigorous rate of growth at the end of the guarantee period. The Landscape Contractor shall not be responsible for acts of God or vandalism. See Landscape Specifications for Warranty requirements/expectations. 23.Any plant that is determined dead, in an unhealthy, unsightly condition, lost its shape due to dead branches, or other symptoms of poor, non-vigorous growth, shall be replaced by the Landscape Contractor. See Landscape Specifications for warranty requirements/expectations. 24.Site to be 100% irrigated in all planting beds and grass area by an automatic underground Irrigation System. Retrofit new heads to existing irrigation system. Cap any unused lateral or mainlines. Ensure that all zones work properly and there is head to head coverage in all areas. 25.Stake all evergreen and deciduous trees as shown in the planting detail and as per the Landscape Specifications. 26.Remove stakes and guying from all trees after one year from planting. LANDSCAPE NOTES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 18 EB UP10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER1 XXXX TGAS XX XX TOTAL PROPOSED AREA = 4,593 SQ. FT.OWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW ' CWN01°08'21"E 406.86' D&MN 01°08'21" E 347.00' P&MAIRPORT ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 31) 200' R/WCLOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWGRASS MEDIANP.O.B.N 00°42'50" W N 89°14'40" E 260.67' PLAT E/PE/PSIGN STOP BARBARSTOPE/PE/PE/P" CONC CURBLSACANOPY CW GM 25 27 30 VV VVVVVVVVVVV V V31 VV VVVVVVVVVVV V V32 VV VVVVVVVVVVV V V33 VV VVVVVVVVVVV V V34 VV VVVVVVVVVVV V V 35 36 37 38 VV VVVVVVVVVVV V V VV VVVVVVVVVVV V V LB #1772 FND N&D GGGGGGGGGG E/PCW 174.69' PLATSITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = SITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = 7 8 9 WIDTH 60.5' HOLLYWOOD DRIVE (PRIVATE) EDGE FH R EXISTING 1 STORY PRE-FABRICATED CONC FFE = 13.16' EX.4,050 SQ. FT. 11.91 SET BENCHMARK N&D 2 NAVD 88 12.27 N&D LB #1772 4 NAVD 88 TREE CHART 1 - 13" PALM 2 - 14" PALM 3 - 7" OAK 4 - 10" OAK 5 - 6" OAK 6 - 10" BLACK OLIVE 7 - 8" BLACK OLIVE 8 - 2-3" MAGNOLIA 9 - 10" BLACK OLIVE 10 - 4" MAGNOLIA 11 - 10" BLACK OLIVE 12 - 9" BLACK OLIVE 13 - 10" BLACK OLIVE 14 - 4" MAGNOLIA 15 - 11" PALM 16 - 9" PALM 17 - 14" PALM 18 - 6" OAK 19 - 10" PALM 20 - 11" PALM 21 - 6" HOLLY 22 - 6" HOLLY 23 - 11" PALM 24 - 10" PALM 25 - 13" PALM 26 - 13" PALM 27 - 9" PALM 28 - 6" OAK 29 - 4" MAGNOLIA 30 - 7" PIGEON PLUM 31 - 6" PIGEON PLUM 32 - 8" PIGEON PLUM 33 - 7" PIGEON PLUM 34 - 7" PIGEON PLUM 35 - 11" PALM 36 - 11" PALM 37 - 13" PALM 38 - 6" PIGEON PLUM 39 - 6" PIGEON PLUM 12-Star Jasmine 6-Coontie Metal Wall Trellis; Train Star Jasmine to grow on trellis Ex. Shrubs to Remain Ex. Shrubs to Remain Ex. Trees to be Removed Ex. Trees to Remain Tree Protection Fencing Ex. Trees to Remain Ex. Shrubs to Remain Ex. Trees to Remain Ex. Shrubs to Remain Replace or repair existing sod and shrubs as necessary Ex. Trees to Remain Ex. Sod Repair/Replace as needed 6-Imperial Blue Plumbago Ex. Shrubs to be Removed 15-Blueberry Flax Lily Ex. Shrubs to be Removed Tree Protection Fencing Tree Protection Fencing Tree Protection Fencing Sod 13-Japanese Boxwood Tree Protection Fencing Sod Sod Sod SodSod X X X X X X X X X 15 16 17 36 37 38 39 X XX 3031323334 35 25 26 27 28 29 21 22 23 X24 19X20 2 Ex Palms + 1 Proposed = 3 Palms7'-9"79 SF8'-0"94 SF 121 SF8'-4"91 SF 161 SF 51 SF 167 SF 3 Ex Palms (15,16,17) 1-Florida Flame Red Maple 3-Cathedral Live Oak 164 SF 1-Florida Flame Red Maple 1-Florida Flame Red Maple 8-Imperial Blue Plumbago5-Ixora MAG MAG BLACK OLIVE MAG OAK PALM HOLLY PALM OAK MAGMAG PALM OAK OAK OAK PIGEON PLUM PALM PALM PALM HOLLY 320 SF 189 SF 1089 SF NORTH 7.5' TYPE "A" LS BUFFER WEST 10' TYPE "D" LS BUFFER SOUTH 10' TYPE "D" LS BUFFER EAST 20' TYPE "D" LS BUFFER 6-Florida Anise Deviation Compensation Area2-Cabbage Palm BLACK OLIVE BLACK OLIVE BLACK OLIVE BLACK OLIVE BLACK OLIVE 27-Coco Plum 44-Coco Plum Replace existing shrubs that are poor performing, dead or damaged. 3-Cabbage Palm 1-Pigeon Plum 21-Coco Plum 4-Pigeon Plum 2-Florida Flame Red Maple10-Simpson Stopper Foundation Landscape Area Interior Landscape Area 36-Coontie 104-Blueberry Flax Lily 3-Florida Flame Red Maple 2-Florida Flame Red Maple X 2-Florida Flame Red Maple 94 SF DEVIATION #2 SOUTH BUFFER PARKING ENCROACHMENT DEVIATION #1 NORTH BUFFER PARKING ENCROACHMENT Deviation Compensation Area 59 9 87 FOUR (4) EXISTING PARKING SPACES PLUS ONE (1) ADDITIONAL LIMIT OF PROPOSED PARKING (TYP) LIMIT OF EXISTING PARKING (TYP) EXISTING TREES IN NORTH BUFFER BELONG TO PARCEL TO NORTH TEN (10) EXISTING PARKIN GSPACES (ONE TO BE REMOVED) TWO (2) EXISTING PARKING SPACES (TO BE REMOVED) Deviation Compensation Area Deviation Compensation Area 1-Cabbage Palm 2-Simpson Stopper NOTE: ALL PROHIBITED EXOTIC VEGETATION SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND IT SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF EXOTICS IN PERPETUITY. (LDC 3.05.08) 3.E.e Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) "V" TRENCH BED EDGING SCALE: NTS5 PermitPermit Information contained on this drawing and in all digital files produced for above named project may not be reproduced in any manner without express written or verbal consent from authorized project representatives. MLD PROJECT # PRINTED FOR DATE SHEET SHEET NUMBER DRAWN BY Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 REVISION SCHEDULE FSU#CHICK-FIL-A2018153 9.7.28 ADNNaples Center FSU5825 Airport Pulling Rd NNaples, FL 341091721 NO.DATE DESCRIPTION Landscape Details L-101 1 10/15/18 Site Plan Changes 2 1/16/19 City Comments 3 3/8/19 Client Comments 4 3/15/19 Site Plan Changes 5 3/21/19 Site Plan Changes 6 5/29/19 Ciity Comments 7 7/3/19 City Comments 8 11/14/19 City Comments4'-0"Maintain existing grade with the tree protection fence unless otherwise indicated on the plans. 2" x 6' steel postsor approved equal. Tree Protection fence: High density polyethylene fencing with 3.5" x 1.5" openings; Color- orange. Steel posts installed at 8' o.c. 5" thick layer of mulch. Notes: 1. See landscape notes for additional tree protection requirements. 2. No pruning shall be performed except by approved arborist. 3. No equipment shall operate inside the protective fencing including during fence installation and removal. 4. See site preparation plan for any modifications with the Tree Protection area. SECTION VIEW 8.5" x 11" sign laminated in plastic spaced every 50' along the fence. URBAN TREE FOUNDATION © 2014 OPEN SOURCE FREE TO USE KEEP OUT TREE PROTECTION AREA Crown drip line or other limit of Tree Protection area. See landscape plan for fence alignment hardwood stakes 3 stakes, 2" x 2", driven firmly into subgrade prior to backfilling 6" Hgt. earth saucer beyond edge of root ball for water retention. Outer edge of saucer to be 6' diameter Guy above first branch with woven strap Mulch depth as defined in the Landscape Specifications; mulch type as defined in the Landscape Notes or on the Landscape Plan. Hold mulch 4” from tree trunk. NOTE 1.Hole to be twice the width of the rootball. 2.Do not heavily prune tree at planting. Prune only crossover limbs, broken or dead branches; Do not remove the terminal buds of branches that extend to the edge of the crown. 3.Each tree must be planted such that the trunk flare is visible at the top of the rootball. Trees where the trunk flare is not visible shall be rejected. Do not cover the top of the rootball with soil. Mulch to be held back 4” away from trunk. 4.Remove Guy Wires and Staking when warranty period has expired (after one year). Set top of rootball so that trunk flare is visible and above finished grade Tamp soil around rootball, and water in 6” layers to remove air pockets Remove all twine, rope, burlap and cut wire basket from top 1/3 of rootball Place rootball on unexcavated subgrade Topsoil and planting mix as defined in the Landscape Specifications “V” Trench Bed Edge Native soils subgrade Mulch depth as defined in the Landscape Specifications; mulch type as defined in the Landscape Notes or on the Landscape Plan Planting pit to be twice the width of the rootball TREE PLANTING & STAKING SCALE: NTS1 SHRUB BED PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: NTS2 GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: NTS3 TREE PROTECTION FENCING DETAIL SCALE: NTS6 Mulch depth as defined in the Landscape Specifications; mulch type as defined in the Landscape Notes or on the Landscape Plan. Hold mulch 4” from tree trunk. Varies Varies As shown on L-100 “V” Trench Bed Edge Native soils subgrade Topsoil as defined in the Landscape Specifications Backfill planting pits with topsoil and native excavated soilMulch depth as defined in the Landscape Specifications; mulch type as defined in the Landscape Notes or on the Landscape Plan Shrubs; type and size as defined on the plant list Planting pit to be twice the width of the rootball A = Row Spacing B = On Center Spacing Space plants in a triangular pattern as shown, spaced equally from each other at spacing indicated on the plant list Native soils subgrade Mulch depth as defined in the Landscape Specifications; mulch type as defined in the Landscape Notes or on the Landscape Plan. Topsoil as defined in the Landscape Specifications NOTE 1. 2. 3. 18" MIN Edge of Bed B B A PLANT SPACING 'B' X ROW SPACING 'A' PLANTS/10SF 8" O.C. 12" O.C. 15" O.C. 18" O.C. 6.9" 10.4" 13.0" 15.7" 26 12 7 5 A = Row Spacing B = On Center Spacing Space plants in a triangular pattern as shown, spaced equally from each other at spacing indicated on the plant list Native soils subgrade A Mulch depth as defined in the Landscape Specifications; mulch type as defined in the Landscape Notes or on the Landscape Plan. Topsoil as defined in the Landscape Specifications NOTE 1.Space groundcover plants in accordance with indicated spacing listed on the plant list, or as shown on the landscape plan. 2.Adjust spacing as necessary to evenly fill planting bed with indicated quantity of plants. 3.Plant to within 24” of the trunks of trees and shrubs within planting bed and to within 18” of edge of bed. 24" Depth TURF SIDE PLANTING BED SIDE Mulch as defined in the Landscape Specifications. Hold Mulch 4" from tree trunk and shrub stems Shovel Cut Bed Edge at 45 degree angle, 6" deep Finished grade at bedline Topsoil as defined in the Landscape Specifications. Native soils subgrade PARKING ISLAND DETAIL SCALE: NTS4 Pavement Typ. Curb & Gutter Typ. Uncompact subgrade to a minimum depth of 24” from top of curb Width Varies Compacted Subgrade Mound islands 6”-8” height above island curbing. Mulch depth as defined in the Landscape Specifications; mulch type as defined in the Landscape Notes or on the Landscape Plan 6"-8" Hgt NOTE 1.Clean construction debris from within landscape island areas (ie. concrete, rocks, rubble, building materials, ect), prior to installing topsoil and plant material. 2.Fracture/loosen existing subgrade to a minimum 24" depth. Remove and replace any subgrade unsuitable for planting. Once subgrade is clean of debris and loosened, add topsoil to a minimum bermed 6"-8" height above island curbing. 3.Island plant material as per the Landscape Plan. 4.Install plant material as per tree, shrub and ground cover planting details, and as defined in the Landsacpe Specifications. 5.Install mulch or sod as specified on the Landscape Plan, and as defined in the Landscape Specifications. Topsoil as defined in the Landscape Specifications; minimum 4” depth 24" Depth 3” Thick panel Greenscreen attached to wall beyond Mounting clip Weave vine branches into screen, starting at bottom. Tie larger branches loosely to screen, if necessary w/t bio-degradeable ties CL ® ® 12" MAX 2'-8" 24" MIN MIN 3” Thick Greenscreen panel attached to wall beyond; see Arch Details for building connection Selected vine - see Landscape Plan. Remove stake or any temporary trellis device Mulch as defined in the Landscape Specifications Backfill with topsoil mixed with native excavated soils Finished grade Remove container and loosen roots Native soils subgrade Panel seam NOTE 1.Plant vines per landscape plans and Landscape Specifications. 2.Typical spacing varies from 1' to 4' OC. depending upon vine species and container size. 3.Irrigation will be required in all climate zones. Install per Irrigation Plan and Irrigation Specifications. Greenscreen does not supply plant material. Mulch depth as defined in the Landscape Specifications; mulch type as defined in the Landscape Notes or on the Landscape Plan. Hold mulch 4” from trunk of tree. GREENSCREEN TRELLIS PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: NTS7 3.E.e Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS PART 1 - GENERAL DESCRIPTION Provide trees, shrubs, ground covers, sod, and annuals/perennials as shown and specified on the landscape plan. The work includes: 1.Soil preparation. 2.Trees, shrubs, ground covers, and annuals/perennials. 3.Planting mixes. 4.Top Soil, Mulch and Planting accessories. 5.Maintenance. 6.Decorative stone. Related Work: 1.Irrigation System; see irrigation specifications (sheet L-2.2) QUALITY ASSURANCE Plant names indicated; comply with “Standardized Plant Names” as adopted by the latest edition of the American Joint Committee of Horticultural Nomenclature. Names of varieties not listed conform generally with names accepted by the nursery trade. Provide stock true to botanical name and legibly tagged. Comply with sizing and grading standards of the latest edition of “American Standard for Nursery Stock”. A plant shall be dimensioned as it stands in its natural position. All plants shall be nursery grown under climatic conditions similar to those in the locality of the project for a minimum of 2 years. Nursery Stock furnished shall be at least the minimum size indicated. Larger stock is acceptable, at no additional cost, and providing that the larger plants will not be cut back to size indicated. Provide plants indicated by two measurements so that only a maximum of 25% are of the minimum size indicated and 75% are of the maximum size indicated. Before submitting a bid, the Contractor shall have investigated the sources of supply and be satisfied that they can supply the listed plants in the size, variety and quality as specified. Failure to take this precaution will not relieve the Contractor from their responsibility for furnishing and installing all plant materials in strict accordance with the Contract Documents without additional cost to the Owner. The Landscape Architect shall approve any substitutes of plant material, or changes in plant material size, prior to the Landscape Contractor submitting a bid. DELIVER, STORAGE AND HANDLING Take all precautions customary in good trade practice in preparing plants for moving. Workmanship that fails to meet the highest standards will be rejected. Spray deciduous plants in foliage with an approved “Anti-Desiccant” immediately after digging to prevent dehydration. Dig, pack, transport, and handle plants with care to ensure protection against injury. Inspection certificates required by law shall accompany each shipment invoice or order to stock. Protect all plants from drying out. If plants cannot be planted immediately upon delivery, properly protect them with soil, wet peat moss, or in a manner acceptable to the Landscape Architect. Water heeled-in plantings daily. No plant shall be bound with rope or wire in a manner that could damage or break the branches. Cover plants transported on open vehicles with a protective covering to prevent wind burn. PROJECT CONDITIONS Protect existing utilities, paving, and other facilities from damage caused by landscape operations. A complete list of plants, including a schedule of sizes, quantities, and other requirements are shown on the drawings. In the event that quantity discrepancies or material omissions occur in the plant materials list, the planting plans shall govern. The irrigation system will be installed prior to planting. Locate, protect and maintain the irrigation system during planting operations. Repair irrigation system components damaged during planting operations; at the Contractor’s expense. Refer to the irrigation specifications, irrigation plan and irrigation details. Do not begin landscape accessory work before completion of final grading or surfacing. WARRANTY Warrant plant material to remain alive, be healthy and in a vigorous condition for a period of 1 year after completion and final acceptance of entire project. Replace, in accordance with the drawings and specifications, all plants that are dead or, are in an unhealthy, or unsightly condition, and have lost their natural shape due to dead branches, or other causes due to the Contractor’s negligence. The cost of such replacement(s) is at the Contractor’s expense. Warrant all replacement plants for 1 year after installation. Warranty shall not include damage, loss of trees, plants, or ground covers caused by fires, floods, freezing rains, lightning storms, winds over 75 miles per hour, winter kill caused by extreme cold, severe winter conditions not typical of planting area, and/or acts of vandalism or negligence on a part of the Owner. Remove and immediately replace all plants, found to be unsatisfactory during the initial planting installation. Maintain and protect plant material, lawns, and irrigation until final acceptance is made. ACCEPTANCE Inspection of planted areas will be made by the Owner’s representative. 1. Planted areas will be accepted provided all requirements, including maintenance, have been complied with and plant materials are alive and in a healthy, vigorous condition. Upon acceptance, the Contractor shall commence the specified plant maintenance. CODES, PERMITS AND FEES Obtain any necessary permits for this Section of Work and pay any fees required for permits. The entire installation shall fully comply with all local and state laws and ordinances, and with all established codes applicable thereto; also as depicted on the landscape and irrigation construction set. PART 2 - PRODUCTS MATERIALS Plants: Provide typical of their species or variety; with normal, densely developed branches and vigorous, fibrous root systems. Provide only sound, healthy, vigorous plants free from defects, disfiguring knots, sun scald injuries, frost cracks, abrasions of the bark, plant diseases, insect eggs, borers, and all forms of infestation. All plants shall have a fully developed form without voids and open spaces. Plants held on storage will be rejected if they show signs of growth during the storage period. 1. Balled and plants wrapped with burlap, to have firm, natural balls of earth of sufficient diameter and depth to encompass the fibrous and feeding root system necessary for full recovery of the plant. Provide ball sizes complying with the latest edition of the “American Standard for Nursery Stock”. Cracked or mushroomed balls, or signs of circling roots are not acceptable. 2. Container- grown stock: Grown in a container for sufficient length of time for the root system to have developed to hold its soil together, firm and whole. a. No plants shall be loose in the container. b. Container stock shall not be pot bound. 3. Plants planted in rows shall be matched in form. 4. Plants larger than those specified in the plant list may be used when acceptable to the Landscape Architect. a.If the use of larger plants is acceptable, increase the spread of roots or root ball in proportion to the size of the plant. 5.The height of the trees, measured from the crown of the roots to the top of the top branch, shall not be less than the minimum size designated in the plant list. 6.No pruning wounds shall be present with a diameter of more than 1” and such wounds must show vigorous bark on all edges. 7.Evergreen trees shall be branched to the ground or as specified in plant list. 8.Shrubs and small plants shall meet the requirements for spread and height indicated in the plant list. a.The measurements for height shall be taken from the ground level to the height of the top of the plant and not the longest branch. b.Single stemmed or thin plants will not be accepted. c.Side branches shall be generous, well-twigged, and the plant as a whole well-bushed to the ground. d.Plants shall be in a moist, vigorous condition, free from dead wood, bruises, or other root or branch injuries. ACCESSORIES Topsoil: Shall be Fertile, friable, natural topsoil of loamy character, without admixture of subsoil material, obtained from a well-drained arable site, reasonably free from clay, lumps, coarse sands, stones, roots, sticks, and other foreign materials, with acidity range of between pH 6.0 and 6.8. Note: All planting areas shall be cleaned of construction debris (ie. Concrete, rubble, stones, building material, etc.) prior to adding and spreading of the top soil. 1. Sod Areas: Spread a minimum 4” layer of top soil and rake smooth. 2. Planting bed areas: Spread a minimum 4” layer of top soil and rake smooth. 3. Landscape Islands/Medians: Fracture/loosen existing subgrade to a minimum 24" depth. Remove and replace any subgrade unsuitable for planting. Once subgrade is clean of debris and loosened, add topsoil to a minimum berm 6"-8" height above island curbing. 4. Annual/Perennial bed areas: Add a minimum of 4” organic matter and till to a minimum 12” depth. Mulch: Type selected dependent on region and availability; see landscape plans for type of much to be used. Hold mulch 4” from tree trunks and shrub stems. 1.Hardwood: 6 month old well rotted double shredded native hardwood bark mulch not larger than 4” in length and ½” in width, free of wood chips and sawdust. Install minimum depth of 3”. 2.Pine Straw: Pine straw to be fresh harvest, free of debris, bright in color. Bales to be wired and tightly bound. Needles to be dry. Install minimum depth of 3”. 3.River Rock: (color) light gray to buff to dark brown, washed river rock, 1” – 3” in size. Install in shrub beds to an even depth of 3”. Weed control barrier to be installed under all rock mulch areas. Use caution during installation not to damage plant material. 4.Mini Nuggets: Install to a minimum depth of 2”-3” at all locations of annual and perennial beds. Lift the stems and leaves of the annuals and carefully spread the mulch to avoid injuring the plants. Gently brush the mulch off the plants. Guying/Staking: 1.Arbortie: Green (or white) staking and guying material to be flat, woven, polypropylene material, ¾” wide 900 lb. break strength. Arbortie shall be fastened to stakes in a manner which permits tree movement and supports the tree. 2.Remove Guying/Staking after one year from planting. Tree Wrap: Tree wraps should be used on young, newly planted thin-barked trees (Cherry, Crabapple, Honey Locust, Linden, Maple, Mountain Ash, Plum) that are most susceptible to sun scald/Sunburn. Standard waterproofed tree wrapping paper, 2-1/2” wide, made of 2 layers of crepe Draft paper weighing not less than 30 lbs. per ream, cemented together with asphalt. Wrap the tree in the fall and leave the wrap in place throughout the winter and early spring. Tree wraps are temporary and no longer needed once trees develop corky bark. PART 3 – EXECUTION INSPECTION Prior to beginning work, the Landscape Contractor shall inspect the subgrade, general site conditions, verify elevations, utility locations, irrigation, approve top soil provided by the General Contractor and observe the site conditions under which the work is to be done. Notify the General Contractor of any unsatisfactory conditions, and work shall not proceed until such conditions have been corrected and are acceptable to the Landscape Contractor. PREPARATION Planting shall be performed only by experienced workmen familiar with planting procedures under the supervision of a qualified supervisor. Locate plants as indicated on the plans or as approved in the field after staking by the Landscape Contractor. If obstructions are encountered that are not shown on the drawings, do not proceed with planting operations until alternate plant locations have been selected and approved by the Landscape Architect; spacing of plant material shall be as shown on the landscape plan. Excavate circular plant pits with vertical sides, except for plants specifically indicated to be planted in beds. Provide shrub pits at least 12” greater than the diameter of the root system and 24” greater for trees. Depth of pit shall accommodate the root system. Provide undisturbed sub grade to hold root ball at nursery grade as shown on the drawings. INSTALLATION Set plant material in the planting pit to proper grade and alignment. Set plants upright, plumb, and faced to give the best appearance or relationship to each other or adjacent structure. Set plant material 2” – 3” above the finish grade. No filling will be permitted around trunks or stems. Backfill the pit with topsoil mix and excavated material. Do not use frozen or muddy mixtures for backfilling. Form a ring of soil around the edge of each planting pit to retain water. After balled and wrapped in burlap plants are set, muddle planting soil mixture around bases of balls and fill all voids. 1.Remove all burlap, ropes, and wires from the top 1/3 of the root ball Space ground cover plants in accordance with indicated dimensions. Adjust spacing as necessary to evenly fill planting bed with indicated quantity of plants. Plant to within 24” of the trunks of trees and shrubs within planting bed and to within 18” of edge of bed. Mulching: 1.Mulch tree and shrub planting pits and shrub beds with required mulching material (see landscape plan for mulch type); depth of mulch as noted above. Hold mulch back 4” away from tree trunks and shrub stems. Thoroughly water mulched areas. After watering, rake mulch to provide a uniform finished surface. Decorative Stone: (where indicated on landscape plan) 1.Install weed control barrier over sub-grade prior to installing stone. Lap 6” on all sides. 2.Place stone without damaging weed barrier. 3.Arrange stones for best appearance and to cover all weed barrier fabric. Wrapping, guying, staking: 1.Inspect trees for injury to trunks, evidence of insect infestation, and improper pruning before wrapping. 2.Wrapping: a.Wrap trunks of all young newly planted trees known to have thin bark. Wrap spirally from bottom to top with specified tree wrap and secure in place. b.Overlap ½ the width of the tree wrap strip and cover the trunk from the ground to the height of the second branch. c.Secure tree wrap in place with twine wound spirally downward in the opposite direction, tied around the tree in at least 3 places in addition to the top and bottom. d.Wrap the trees in the fall and leave the wrap in place throughout the winter and early spring. d.Tree wraps are temporary and no longer needed once the trees develop corky bark. 3.Staking/Guying: a.Stake/guy all trees immediately after lawn sodding operations and prior to acceptance. b.Stake deciduous trees 2” caliper and less. Stake evergreen trees under 7’-0” tall. 1. Stakes are placed in line with prevailing wind direction and driven into undisturbed soil. 2. Ties are attached to the tree, usually at the lowest branch. c.Guy deciduous trees over 2” caliper. Guy evergreen trees 7’-0” tall and over. 1.Guy wires to be attached to three stakes driven into undisturbed soil, with one stake placed in the direction of the prevailing wind. 2. Ties are attached to the tree as high as practical. 3.The axis of the stake should be at 90 degree angle to the axis on the pull of the guy wire. 4.Remove all guying and staking after one year from planting. Pruning: 1.Prune deciduous trees and evergreens only to remove broken or damaged branches. WORKMANSHIP During landscape/irrigation installation operations, all areas shall be kept neat and clean. Precautions shall be taken to avoid damage to existing structures. All work shall be performed in a safe manner to the operators, the occupants and any pedestrians. Upon completion of installation operations, all excess materials, equipment, debris and waste material shall be cleaned up and removed from the site; unless provisions have been granted by the owner to use on-site trash receptacles. Sweep parking and walks clean of dirt and debris. Remove all plant tags and other debris from lawns and planting areas. Any damage to the landscape, the structure, or the irrigation system caused by the landscape contractor shall be repaired by the landscape contractor without charge to the owner. MAINTENANCE Contractor shall provide maintenance until work has been accepted by the Owner's Representative. Maintenance shall include mowing, fertilizing, mulching, pruning, cultivation, weeding, watering, and application of appropriate insecticides and fungicides necessary to maintain plants and lawns free of insects and disease. 1.Re-set settled plants to proper grade and position. Restore planting saucer and adjacent material and remove dead material. 2.repair guy wires and stakes as required. Remove all stakes and guy wires after 1 year. 3.Correct defective work as soon as possible after deficiencies become apparent and weather and season permit. 4.Water trees, plants and ground cover beds within the first 24 hours of initial planting, and not less than twice per week until final acceptance. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS The Contractor shall provide as a separate bid, maintenance for a period of 1 year after final acceptance of the project landscaping. The Contractor must be able to provide continued maintenance if requested by the Owner or provide the name of a reputable landscape contractor who can provide maintenance. STANDARDS All landscape maintenance services shall be performed by trained personnel using current, acceptable horticultural practices. All work shall be performed in a manner that maintains the original intent of the landscape design. All chemical applications shall be performed in accordance with current county, state and federal laws, using EPA registered materials and methods of application. These applications shall be performed under the supervision of a Licensed Certified applicator. APPROVALS Any work performed in addition to that which is outlined in the contract shall only be done upon written approval by the Owner’s Representative (General Manager of the restaurant). All seasonal color selections shall be approved by the General Manager prior to ordering and installation. SOIL TESTING The maintenance contractor shall perform soil tests as needed to identify imbalances or deficiencies causing plant material decline. The owner shall be notified of the recommendation for approval, and the necessary corrections made at an additional cost to the owner. Acceptable Soil Test Results Landscape Trees and Shrubs Turf pH Range 5.0-7.0 6.0-7.0 Organic Matter >1.5%>2.5% Magnesium (Mg)100+lbs./acre 100+lbs./acre Phosphorus (P2O5)150+lbs./acre 150+lbs./acre Potassium (K2O)120+lbs./acre 120+lbs./acre Soluble salts/Not to exceed 900ppm/1.9 mmhos/cm Not to exceed 750ppm/0.75 mmhos/cm Conductivity in soil; not to exceed 1400 ppm/2.5 in soil; not to exceed 2000 ppm/2.0 mmhos/cm in high organic mix mmhos/cm in high organic mix For unusual soil conditions, the following optional tests are recommended with levels not to exceed: Boron 3 pounds per acre Manganese 50 pounds per acre Potassium (K2O)450 pounds per acre Sodium 20 pounds per acre WORKMANSHIP During landscape maintenance operations, all areas shall be kept neat and clean. Precautions shall be taken to avoid damage to existing structures. All work shall be performed in a safe manner to the operators, the occupants and any pedestrians. Upon completion of maintenance operations, all debris and waste material shall be cleaned up and removed from the site, unless provisions have been granted by the owner to use on-site trash receptacles. Any damage to the landscape, the structure, or the irrigation system caused by the maintenance contractor, shall be repaired by the maintenance contractor without charge to the owner. TURF GENERAL CLEAN UP Prior to mowing, all trash, sticks, and other unwanted debris shall be removed from lawns, plant beds, and paved areas. MOWING Warm season grasses (i.e. Bermuda grass) shall be maintained at a height of 1” to 2” during the growing season. Cool season grasses, including blue grass, tall fescue, perennial ryegrass, etc., shall be maintained at a height of 2” to 3” in spring and fall. From June through September, mowing height shall be maintained at no less than 3”. The mowing operation includes trimming around all obstacles, raking excessive grass clippings and removing debris from walks, curbs, and parking areas. Caution: Weed eaters should NOT be used around trees because of potential damage to the bark. EDGING Edging of all sidewalks, curbs and other paved areas shall be performed once every other mowing. Debris from the edging operations shall be removed and the areas swept clean. Caution shall be used to avoid flying debris. LIMING & FERTILIZING A soil test shall be taken to determine whether an application of limestone in late fall is necessary. If limestone is required, the landscape contractor shall specify the rate, obtain approval from the owner and apply it at an additional cost. A unit price for liming of turf shall accompany the bid based on a rate of 50 pounds per 1000 square feet. Fertilizer shall be applied in areas based on the existing turf species. LAWN WEED CONTROL: HERBICIDES Selection and proper use of herbicides shall be the landscape contractor’s responsibility. All chemical applications shall be performed under the supervision of a Licensed Certified Applicator. Read the label prior to applying any chemical. INSECT & DISEASE CONTROL FOR TURF The contractor shall be responsible for monitoring the site conditions on each visit to determine if any insect pest or disease problems exist. The contractor shall identify the insect pest or disease, as well as the host plant, and then consult the most current edition of the Cooperative Extension Service’s “Commercial Insecticide Recommendation for Turf” for control. The licensed applicator shall be familiar with the label provided for the selected product prior to application. Inspection and treatment to control insect pests shall be included in the contract price. TREES, SHRUBS, & GROUND COVER PRUNING All ornamental trees, shrubs and ground cover shall be pruned when appropriate to remove dead or damaged branches, develop the natural shapes. Do not shear trees or shrubs. If previous maintenance practice has been to shear and ball, then a natural shape will be restored gradually. Pruning Guidelines: 1.Prune those that flower before the end of June immediately after flowering. Flower buds develop during the previous growing season. Fall, winter or spring pruning would reduce the spring flowering display. 2.Prune those that flower in summer or autumn in winter or spring before new growth begins, since these plants develop flowers on new growth. 3.Delay pruning plants grown for ornamental fruits, such as cotoneasters, pyracanthas and viburnums. 4.Hollies and other evergreens may be pruned during winter in order to use their branches for seasonal decoration. However, severe pruning of evergreens should be done in early spring only. 5.Broadleaf evergreen shrubs shall be hand-pruned to maintain their natural appearance after the new growth hardens off. 6.Hedges or shrubs that require shearing to maintain a formal appearance shall be pruned as required. Dead wood shall be removed from sheared plants before the first shearing of the season. 7.Conifers shall be pruned, if required, according to their genus. A.Yews, junipers, hemlocks, arborvitae, and false-cypress may be pruned after new growth has hardened off in late summer. If severe pruning is necessary, it must be done in early spring. B.Firs and spruces may be lightly pruned in late summer, fall, or winter after completing growth. Leave side buds. Never cut central leader. C.Pines may be lightly pruned in early June by reducing candles. 8.Groundcover shall be edged and pruned as needed to contain it within its borders. 9.Thinning: Remove branches and water sprouts by cutting them back to their point of origin on parent stems. This method results in a more open plant, without stimulating excessive growth. Thinning is used on crepe myrtles, lilacs, viburnums, smoke bush,etc. 10.Renewal pruning: Remove oldest branches of shrub at ground, leaving the younger, more vigorous branches. Also remove weak stems. On overgrown plants, this method may be best done over a three-year period. Renewal pruning may be used on abelia, forsythia, deutzia, spiraea, etc. Plants overhanging passageways and parking areas and damaged plants shall be pruned as needed. Shade trees that cannot be adequately pruned from the ground shall not be included in the Maintenance Contract. A certified arborist under a separate contract shall perform this type of work. SPRING CLEANUP Plant beds shall receive a general cleanup before fertilizing and mulching. Cleanup includes removing debris and trash from beds and cutting back herbaceous perennials left standing through winter, e.g. ornamental grasses, Sedum Autumn Joy. FERTILIZING For trees, the rate of fertilization depends on the tree species, tree vigor, area available for fertilization, and growth stage of the tree. Mature specimens benefit from fertilization every 3 to 4 years; younger trees shall be fertilized more often during rapid growth stages. The current recommendation is based on the rate of 1000 square feet of area under the tree to be fertilized. For deciduous trees, 2 to 6 pounds of Nitrogen per 1000 square feet; for narrow-leaf evergreens, 1 to 4 pounds of Nitrogen per 1000 square feet; for broadleaf evergreens, 1 to 3 pounds of Nitrogen per 1000 square feet. Shrubs and groundcover shall be top-dressed with compost 1” deep, or fertilized once in March with 10-6-4 analysis fertilizer at the rate of 3 pounds per 100 square feet of bed area. Ericaceous material shall be fertilized with an ericaceous fertilizer at the manufacturer’s recommendation rate. If plants are growing poorly, a soil sample should be taken. MULCHING Annually, all tree and shrub beds will be prepared and mulched, to a minimum depth of 3” with quality mulch to match existing. Bed preparation shall include removing all weeds, cleaning up said bed, edging and cultivating decayed mulch into the soil. Debris from edging is to be removed from beds where applicable. If deemed necessary, a pre-emergent herbicide may be applied to the soil to inhibit the growth of future weeds. Organically maintained gardens shall not receive any pre-emergent herbicides. Mulch in excess of 4” will be removed from the bed areas. SPECIAL CARE shall be taken in the mulching operation not to over-mulch or cover the base of trees and shrubs. This can be detrimental to the health of the plants. WEEDING All beds shall be weeded on a continuous basis throughout the growing season to maintain a neat appearance at all times. Pre-emergent (soil-applied) and post-emergent (foliar-applied) herbicides shall be used where and when applicable and in accordance with the product’s label. INSECT & DISEASE CONTROL: TREES, SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVER The maintenance contractor shall be responsible for monitoring the landscape site on a regular basis. The monitoring frequency shall be monthly except for growing season, which will be every other week. Trained personnel shall monitor for plant damaging insect activity, plant pathogenic diseases and potential cultural problems in the landscape. The pest or cultural problem will be identified under the supervision of the contractor. For plant damaging insects and mites identified in the landscape, the contractor shall consult and follow the recommendations of the most current edition of the state Cooperative Service publication on insect control on landscape plant material. Plant pathogenic disease problems identified by the contractor that can be resolved by pruning or physical removal of damaged plant parts will be performed as part of the contract. For an additional charge, plant pathogenic diseases that can be resolved through properly timed applications of fungicides shall be made when the owner authorizes it. If the contractor notes an especially insect-or disease-prone plant species in the landscape, he/she will suggest replacement with a more pest-resistant cultivar or species that is consistent with the intent of the landscape design. NOTE: For identification of plant-damaging insects and mites, a reference textbook that can be used is Insects that feed on Trees and Shrubs by Johnson and Lyon, Comstock Publishing Associates. For plan pathogenic diseases, two references are suggested: Scouting and Controlling Woody Ornamental Diseases in Landscapes and Nurseries, authorized by Gary Moorman, published by Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences, and Diseases of Trees and Shrubs by Sinclair and Lyon, published by Comstock Publishing Press. TRASH REMOVAL The maintenance contractor shall remove trash from all shrub and groundcover beds with each visit. LEAF REMOVAL All fallen leaves shall be removed from the site in November and once in December. If requested by the owner, the maintenance contractor, at an additional cost to the owner shall perform supplemental leaf removals. WINTER CLEAN-UP The project shall receive a general clean-up once during each of the winter months, i.e., January, February, and March. Clean-up includes: •Cleaning curbs and parking areas •Removing all trash and unwanted debris •Turning mulch where necessary •Inspection of grounds SEASONAL COLOR: PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, AND BULBS The installation of perennials, annuals, and bulbs, unless specified herein, shall be reviewed with the owner, and, if accepted, installed and billed to the owner. SEASONAL COLOR MAINTENANCE Perennialization of Bulbs: 1.After flowering, cut off spent flower heads. 2.Allow leaves of daffodils and hyacinths to remain for six weeks after flowers have faded. Cut off at base. 3.Allow leaves of other bulbs to yellow naturally and then cut off at base. 4.Apply fertilizer after flowering in spring, possibly again in fall. Apply 10-10-10 at the rate of 2 pounds per 1000 square feet, or top-dress with compost 1” deep. Fall fertilization with a bulb fertilizer or mulching with 1” of compost is optional. Flower Rotation: 1.Bulbs: Remove the entire plant and bulb after flowers have faded or at the direction of the owner, and install new plants if included in contract. 2.Summer Annuals or Fall Plants: a.Dead heading: Pinch and remove dead flowers on annuals as necessary. b.Fertilizing Summer Annuals: Fertilize using one or two methods: Apply a slow-release fertilizer in May following manufacturer’s recommendations. A booster such as 10-10-10 may be necessary in late summer. Or, apply liquid fertilizations of 20-20-20 water-soluble fertilizers, not to exceed 2 pounds of 20-20-20 per 100 gallons of water, monthly; or mulch with compost 1” deep. c.Removal: If fall plants are to be installed, summer annuals shall be left in the ground until the first killing frost and then removed, unless otherwise directed by the owner. Perennials: 1.After initial installation, if a time-released fertilizer has been incorporated during plant installation, no more fertilizer need be applied the first growing season. 2.The following year: a.Fertilize perennials with a slow-release fertilizer or any 50% organic fertilizer, or mulch perennials with compost 1” deep. b.Cut all deciduous perennials flush to the ground by March 1, if this was not done the previous fall, to allow new growth to develop freely. c.Mulch the perennial bed once in early spring at 1”-2” depth. If soil is bared in late fall, re-mulch lightly after ground is frozen to protect perennials. d.Inspect for insect or disease problems on perennials. Monitor and control slugs on hostas and ligularias. Powdery mildew on phlox, monardas, and asters can be prevented with properly timed fungicides or use of disease-resistant varieties. e.Weed perennial bed as specified in “WEEDING” above. f.Prune branching species to increase density. Cut only the flowering stems after blooming. Do not remove the foliage. 3.The following fall cut back deteriorating plant parts unless instructed to retain for winter interest, e.g. Sedum Autumn Joy and ornamental grasses. 4.Long-term Care: a.Divide plants that overcrowd the space provided. Divide according to the species. Some need frequent dividing, e.g. asters and yarrow every two years; other rarely, if ever, e.g. peonies, hostas, and astilbe. b.For detailed information regarding the care of specific perennials, refer to All About Perennials by Ortho; Perennials: How to Select, Grow and Enjoy by Pamela Harper and Frederick McGouty, Hp Books Publisher; Herbaceous Perennial Plants: A Treatise on their Identification, Culture and Garden Attributes by Allan Armitage, Stipes Pub LLC. SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE LAWN MAINTENANCE 1.Soil analysis performed annually to determine pH. If pH does not fall within specified range, adjust according to soil test recommendations. 2.Maintain proper fertility and pH levels of the soil to provide an environment conducive to turf vitality for cool season grasses 3.Mow warm and cool season on a regular basis and as season and weather dictates. Remove no more than the top 1/3 of leaf blade. Clippings on paved and bed areas will be removed. 4.Aerate warm season turf areas to maintain high standards of turf appearance. 5.Apply pre-emergent to turf in two applications in early February and early April to extend barrier. 6.Apply post emergent as needed to control weeds. 7.Mechanically edge curbs and walks. 8.Apply non-selective herbicide, to mulched bed areas and pavement and remove excess runners to maintain clean defined beds. TREE, GROUNDCOVER, AND SHRUB BED MAINTENANCE 1.Prune shrubs, trees and groundcover to encourage healthy growth and create a natural appearance. 2.Mulch to be applied in February/March with a half rate in late summer to top dress. 3.Apply pre-emergent herbicides in February and April. 4.Manual weed control to maintain clean bed appearance. 5.Apply fungicides and insecticides as needed to control insects and disease. 6.Ornamental shrubs, trees and groundcovers to be fertilized three (3) times per year with a balanced material (January/February, April/May, and October/November) 7.Edge all mulched beds. 8.Remove all litter and debris. GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1.Remove all man-made debris, blow edges. 2.Inspect grounds on a monthly basis and schedule inspection with Unit Operator.PermitPermit Information contained on this drawing and in all digital files produced for above named project may not be reproduced in any manner without express written or verbal consent from authorized project representatives. MLD PROJECT # PRINTED FOR DATE SHEET SHEET NUMBER DRAWN BY Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 REVISION SCHEDULE FSU#CHICK-FIL-A2018153 9.7.18 ADNNaples Center FSU5825 Airport Pulling Rd NNaples, FL 341091721 NO.DATE DESCRIPTION Landscape & Maintenance Specifications L-102 1 10/15/18 Site Plan Changes 2 1/16/19 City Comments 3 3/8/19 Client Comments 4 3/15/19 Site Plan Changes 5 3/21/19 Site Plan Changes 6 5/29/19 City Comments 7 7/3/19 City Comments 8 11/14/19 City Comments 3.E.e Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: Attachment D SDP PL2018-1622 (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.fPacket Pg. 703Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.fPacket Pg. 704Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.fPacket Pg. 705Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.fPacket Pg. 706Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) May 24, 2019 Collier County Growth Management Department Planning & Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-2400 Reference: Chick-fil-A #1721 / Naples 5825 Airport Pulling Road N. Naples, FL 34109 IP # 2017.0173 Project Narrative Please accept this project narrative as part of our submittal for an Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) for the redevelopment of the existing Chick-fil-A at this location. As part of the scope of work for the project, Interplan has included a proposed reduction in the northern landscape buffer of 7.5’ (to 1.5’ - 7’, width varies, refer to C-2.0 Site Dimension Plan) as well as a parking reduction from 46 required to 43 proposed, which in addition, had been approved previously by the County through APR-205-AR-8167 to 41 spaces. Thus, overall the proposed site results in a net gain of 2 additional parking spaces. The proposed site improvements require a reduction in the parking area to allow area for an additional drive-thru lane to be located within the site and adjacent to the building. This lane allows for traffic to drive within the limits of the existing Porte cache and the proposed Face to Face (F2F) canopy. It has been determined that the majority of Chick Fil-A’s business (approximately 79%) occurs through the drive-thru. The allowance for more traffic to circle the building within these lanes will allow for more interior vehicular stacking as well as improve the efficiency of the delivery time through the proposed building expansion, which includes a kitchen expansion, and will not increase the seating capacity of the restaurant or number of employees working. The reduction in the northern landscape buffer is requested to provide the width necessary for the drive aisle. This reduction from existing 7.5’ (15’ shared), will allow for landscaped area from 1.5’ – 7’ wide within Chick Fil-A property at the northern property line. The reduction also increases the drive aisle width as necessary to accommodate an additional lane as well as 3.E.f Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Chick-fil-A #1721/ Naples May 24, 2019 Page 2 of 4 allow for large truck traffic for items such as garbage disposal and access to proposed dumpster location to be conducted at off-peak hours. The existing buffer north of and adjacent to Chick Fil-A will remain with mature landscaping as you can see from the photo below, taken May 17, 2019. In addition to this proposed site plan, additional alternatives were reviewed with Collier County Staff at the Pre-Application Meeting which was held February 6, 2019 at 3:00 p.m. The options included the following: Pre- App Notes (as taken by Sara Guntrum): Originally, Chick Fil-A (CFA) submitted an application for a variance to existing site requesting removal of our portion (7.5’) of shared northern 15’ landscape buffer as part of S&R project. · This option was not supported by County, and Collier County’s attorney stated IP would not receive their support at the Commission Hearing for this alternative because removing a buffer 3.E.f Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Chick-fil-A #1721/ Naples May 24, 2019 Page 3 of 4 was unprecedented and not something that has been approved in the past, the landscaped area has traditionally been relocated on-site when approved for removal of a buffer. · Collier County’s Lead Planner, James Sobo, discussed the following Alternatives: o Option #1 – (PREFERRED OPTION) reduce buffer and relocate landscaping within the limits of CFA leased parcel. · This option could be completed through PDI – Insubstantial Change Revision to PUD. o Option #2 – request CFA to enter into an agreement with an adjacent lease to utilize additional parking and replace existing onsite parking with removed landscaping / green space area to balance CFA site. · This option would require a deviation through PDI process as Insubstantial Change to PUD; and would require a section to be added to the current PUD as “Deviation” for the purpose of relocating and maintaining parking / landscaped area. · (Note: Relocating landscaped area to another lease site within the PUD was reviewed by Collier County Planning Coordinator for acceptance at their level prior to submitting this option for approval). o Option #3 – request CFA to apply for a change to layout of current property limits approved in PUD by pushing out western property line and drive aisle, while maintaining landscape buffer and adding parking and landscaped area within limits of this new site area. · This option requires a property line adjustment and additional property lease on behalf of CFA. · This option could be done within limits of current application process for SPDI, showing the property line changes to be recorded into the PUD as well as giving the remaining departments the ability to review the site and comment. o Also as part of the discussion, it was determined that the proposed building addition was within maximum building SF in CFA’s existing lease agreement as well as within the original PUD; it was determined that CFA is not yet at their maximum building area threshold with this proposed addition. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. If I am unavailable, Sara Guntrum, the Project Manager, will be able to answer your questions. 3.E.f Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Chick-fil-A #1721/ Naples May 24, 2019 Page 4 of 4 Sincerely, INTERPLAN LLC Kendra Lewis Permit Manager Cc: S. Guntrum; S. Anderson; IP File 3.E.f Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) $ 48,535,900 $ 897,336 $ 378,034 $ 1,275,370 $ 1,275,370 $ 1,275,370 $ 1,275,370 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No 66760012725 Site Address 5825 AIRPORT RD N Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34109 Name / Address GLL SELECTION II FLORIDA LP % GLL REAL ESTATE PTNRS 200 S ORANGE AVE STE 1375 City ORLANDO State FL Zip 32801-3415 Map No. Strap No. SectionTownshipRange Acres  *Estimated 4A11 558425 34A11 11 49 25 1.03 Legal PINE AIR LAKES UNIT FIVE LOT 3 Millage Area 224 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 558425 - PINE AIR LAKES UNIT 5 School Other Total Use Code 22 - DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS 5.049 5.8222 10.8712 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 05/06/08 4357-1707 2018 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 10/26/2018http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=378338940&ccpaver=1710181149&... 3.E.f Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) LEGAL DESCRIPTION porce or tr c of l nd lyln9 In S etlon II TownshIp 9 So th RAnge tS ast Col1hr County florid bctn9 d cdb i foil CQlmndl 9 t thot ftorthciu orn r of uld 5 t10 11 n S 0002144 W 1 n9 lh lit 11n of said Scctlo 11 dhUnce of 1316 86 eet thence S esOH 13 W 10Q 04 ftct to the PO HT Of e Gt IHG lR the st rly r19ht o VlY ltne of County R4td f 31 lheACt continue S 8041 3 V 2 5 0G ut thence S 01005127 lJl 71 eet thtnce S o eos 1S t 1316 18 ce q nce eeoSt 31 13l Cl ftet lMlce K 00 18 58 W 329 5 f t thence K 88050 S7 ElliS r t to the r st rly r1Jht lt vy lintof County ROld Ko 31 thtflct K 00 21 la 110n1 uld r19 t O fl 111nc 983 2 8 f et thence K 00027 0 E 110n9 s 1d rt9ht o t1 line IJ18 60 eet to the POIKT or 8EGIllI lKG Slid parce l or tract conulnIRg 1c8 99 liCret IQrt or leu Subjtct to tucmenti restrlct ions J nd rutnttlons of fecenf ludn bUed on I be ln of 00027 7 on tho Eut Hn of tM lit of Soctlon n TOImshlp SouUl Un 25 Elst Collier County Flarf41 this 4u rlptloot cts U10 Klnl T 11II1 Sun4Inl u set o by the norfdl eOlMS of Lind SurveyQrt pursutnt to olptU 472 027 riorldl SUtutu Pine Air Lakes PUDZ A 2005 AR 8550 Exhibit B 3.E.f Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.fPacket Pg. 720Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.fPacket Pg. 722Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Further Information on the entity structure of the property owner limited partnership, GLL Selection II Florida, L.P.: The general partner, GLL Selection II GP Corp., is a wholly-owned subsidiary of GLL Real Estate Partners, Inc., which is in turn a wholly-owned US subsidiary of GLL Real Estate Partners GmbH, a German company. The limited partner, GLL Selection Fund II Holding Alpha S.a’.r.l., is a Luxembourg entity which is affiliated with GLL Real Estate Partners GmbH and whose ultimate beneficial owners are Italian institutional investors. Furthermore, Macquarie Group Limited is the ultimate holding company of GLL Real Estate Partners GmbH as seen on the next page displaying the chain of ownership. Macquarie Group Limited is publicly traded on the Australian stock exchange under ticker symbol, MQG. 3.E.f Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.fPacket Pg. 724Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) x3.E.fPacket Pg. 725Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.fPacket Pg. 726Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Department of State /Division of Corporations /Search Records /Detail By Document Number / Document Number FEI/EIN Number Date Filed State Status Detail by Entity Name Foreign Profit Corporation CHICK-FIL-A, INC. Filing Information 839685 58-0941582 12/16/1977 GA ACTIVE Principal Address 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Changed: 04/03/1992 Mailing Address 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Changed: 04/03/1992 Registered Agent Name & Address CT CORPORATION SYSTEM 1200 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD PLANTATION, FL 33324 Name Changed: 04/03/1992 Address Changed: 04/03/1992 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title Secretary, Sr. Vice President Chastain, B. Lynn 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title CEO CATHY, DAN T DIVISION OF CORPORATIONSFlorida Department of State Page 1 of 7Detail by Entity Name 3/22/2019http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entity... 3.E.f Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Treasurer, Sr. Vice President Ragsdale, Brent D. 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Director, Executive VP CATHY, DONALD M 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349 Title CFO Ragsdale, Brent D 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Director Cathy, Dan T 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Director Duke, Michael T. 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Director Loritts, Crawford W., Jr. 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Director Reinemund, Steven S 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title President Tassopoulos, Timothy 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Director Page 2 of 7Detail by Entity Name 3/22/2019http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entity... 3.E.f Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Fielder, Brent 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Sr. Vice President Blythe, Roger 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Sr. Vice President Bridges, Jonathan 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Sr. Vice President Cathy, Andrew 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Sr. Vice President Costello, Anita 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Sr. Vice President Dugas, Robert 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Sr. Vice President Dunphy, William 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Sr. Vice President Erbrick, Michael 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Sr. Vice President Hazelton, Michael 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Page 3 of 7Detail by Entity Name 3/22/2019http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entity... 3.E.f Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Title Sr. Vice President Reid, Erwin 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Sr. Vice President Robinson, Clifford 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title Sr. Vice President Sweatt, Christopher Todd 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Benson, Shane 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Bridges, Janet 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Bullard, Rodney 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Farmer, David 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Faulk, William 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Frost, Susannah Page 4 of 7Detail by Entity Name 3/22/2019http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entity... 3.E.f Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Hoover, Wayne 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Johnson, Kimberly 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Kurlander, Carrie 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Ludwick, Kelly 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Matherne, Richard 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Miller, T. Mark 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Moody, Sandra 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Okuma, Onome 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Page 5 of 7Detail by Entity Name 3/22/2019http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entity... 3.E.f Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Pearson, S. Tammy 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Saracino, Joseph 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Smith, Lynette 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Stephenson, John 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Wannamaker, Elizabeth 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Title VP Wiley, Paul 5200 BUFFINGTON RD ATLANTA, GA 30349-2998 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2017 01/13/2017 2018 03/30/2018 2019 03/21/2019 Document Images 03/21/2019 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/30/2018 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/13/2017 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/29/2016 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/30/2015 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/18/2014 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/30/2013 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/22/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/22/2011 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format Page 6 of 7Detail by Entity Name 3/22/2019http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entity... 3.E.f Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 04/26/2010 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/29/2009 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 08/14/2008 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/15/2008 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/16/2007 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/26/2006 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/15/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/30/2004 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/22/2003 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/09/2002 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/16/2001 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/24/2000 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/05/1999 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/02/1998 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/22/1997 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/23/1996 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/18/1995 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations Page 7 of 7Detail by Entity Name 3/22/2019http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entity... 3.E.f Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 ● www.colliercountyfl.gov June 4, 2020 Gwen Nicholas Interplan, LLC 604 Courtland St. Suite 100 Orlando, FL 32804 APR-PL20190001483, Administrative Parking Reduction (APR) for The Chick-fil-a restaurant located at 5825 Airport Pulling Road N. in Section 11, Township 49, Range 25 of unincorporated Collier County, Florida. Ms. Nicholas, You have applied for an Administrative Parking Reduction (APR) to allow reduce the parking requirement for The Chick-fil-a restaurant which is the result of a proposed improvement to the existing site by increasing the size of the kitchen by 500 square feet with a multi-lane order point at the drive-through and adding a Face to Face Canopy at the drive-through to provide shelter over the customers and employees. Submittal Documents: Cover letter; Completed APR application; Affidavit of Authorization; Addressing Checklist; Existing Site Development Plan (SDP); Zoning Ceritificate; Survey; and Property Owner Disclosure Form. Project Summary: The applicant has just submitted a request for parking reduction Chick-fil-a of Naples has applied to reduce the number of required parking spaces from 46 parking spaces to 43 parking spaces. You have submitted justification in the form of a narrative letter to accommodate a deficiency of 3 off- street parking spaces totaling 6.52% of the total parking requirement. Zoning: The Official Zoning Atlas reveals this Chick-fil-a is located within a Planned Unit Development (PUD) called Pine Air Lakes. The zoning designation of the abutting properties are the following: x North – Pine Air Lakes PUD x South – Hollywood Dr. ROW/ Pine Air Lakes PUD x East – Airport Rd. ROW/ Residential Single Family (RSF-3) x West – Pine Air Lakes PUD Review Comments: LDC subsection 4.05.04.F.4 states: “The County Manager or designee may determine the minimum parking requirements for a use which is not specifically referenced below of for which an applicant has provided evidence that a specific use is of such a unique nature that the applicable minimum parking ratio listed in this LDC should not be applied. In making such a determination the County Manager or designee may require submission of parking generation studies; evidence of parking ratios applied by other counties and municipalities for the specific use; reserved parking pursuant to section 4.05.05; and other conditions and safeguards deemed to be appropriate to protect the public health, safety, and welfare.” 3.E.f Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Administrative Parking Reduction APR-PL20190001483 Page 2 of 2 Findings/Conclusion: According to the narrative letter provided by the applicant the proposed site improvements require a reduction in the parking area to allow for a kitchen expansion and area for an additional drive-thru lane to be located within the site and adjacent to the building. This lane allows for traffic to drive within the limits of the existing site and the proposed Face to Face (F2F) canopy included in the site plan amendment. The applicant has also determined that the majority of Chick Fil-A’s business (approximately 79%) occurs through the drive-thru further cementing the necessity to have a drive through that can handle higher volumes of customers. The allowance for more traffic to circle the building within these lanes will allow for more interior vehicular stacking which will improve the efficiency of the delivery time through the proposed building expansion, which includes a kitchen expansion, and will not increase the seating capacity of the restaurant or number of employees working. Staff has reviewed the application based on justification provided for the reduction from the required parking spaces of 3 parking spaces or 6.52% of the total required parking. Staff finds all elements of LDC Section 4.05.04.F.4 have been satisfied, and the applicant has provided enough evidence to illustrate the unique nature of this Chick-fil-a’s function and proposed improvements. Approval: Given the information you have provided, Zoning Staff hereby approve the subject APR request to allow for a parking reduction of 6.52% or Three (3) off-street parking spaces from the parking requirement established by LDC Section 4.05.04 G., Table 17. This approval is subject to the following: A. Approval of this Administrative Parking Reduction is largely predicated on the information outlined above and the evidence presented in the application request. Any changes to the facilities or business operation or conversion to another business shall necessitate a re-review of this parking reduction which may result in the need for additional parking spaces to be provided. B. This APR and the referenced parking summary/tabulation must be referenced as part of any SDP or any future amendment or insubstantial change as required by Code. C. If at any time Collier County officials determine insufficient parking exists to safely support the subject hotel establishment, accessory uses and restaurant, the applicant/owner, must act to alleviate the problem by any means necessary. D. Approval of this APR is further predicated on SDPA approval. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Ray Bellows Zoning Manager bellows_r Digitally signed by bellows_r Date: 2020.06.04 17:20:44 -04'00' 3.E.f Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) SUBDIVISON INDEX ATTEST___________________________CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TWP 49S RNG 26E SEC(S) 14 SO 1/2 MAP NUMBER: BY___________________________CHAIRMAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 7PU 6V 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 321 1 1 7 1 4d PINE AIR LAKES 3,5, p.u.2 2 1 CPUD C-5 C-5CANAL AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD (C.R.31)HOUCHIN STREETWASHINGTON STREETYAHL STREETSHIRLEY STREETSEWARD AVENUE PINE RIDGE ROAD (C.R. 896)TAYLOR ROADC-5 ,9 CANAL 11 11 JAEGER COMM. 22,4 2,4 IND. CENTER LOT 1LOT 2 LOT 5 C-5 3,5 3,5C-5 CU 10 ,11,17,19,20 NAPLES BOULEVARDPARCEL 1A HOME DEPOT 12 12 9 10,13 12 LOT 4 4 4 4 PU 12 V 13 9 14V KATHLEEN COURT4 5 3 6 2 1 6 6 6 6 6 6 2,4 PARCEL H PARCEL R PARCEL B7 17 77 1 7 V15 H-1 5 55 5 CU 16 NAPLESBOULEVARD4 8 9 9 88 8 3 ST/W-4 ST/W-3 18 18 3 3 39 9 TRACT A 1 5 4 3 2 2 1 12 12 10 10 10 3 3 10 10 99 DRI PARCEL H-2PARCEL 11 11 11 11 H-3 PARCEL SV 21 TRACT2 LAKE TRACT 1 TRACT1 TRACT 3 I I 2 1 13 1313 13 1313 1313 13 $NO. NAME P.B. Pg. 1 IRMINGER PLAT (Unrec.) 2 JAEGER COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL CENTER 22 69 3 PINE AIR LAKES UNIT 1 24 98-101 4 REPLAT OF LOT 3 OF JEAGER COMM IND CTR 25 23 5 MONTALVO AT HOME DEPOT 35 63-64 6 KATHLEEN COURT 33 6-7 7 HOME DEPOT NAPLES 33 65-66 8 PINE AIR LAKES UNIT 4 38 51-53 9 PINE AIR LAKES UNIT 5 43 74-75 10 PINE AIR LAKES UNIT 6 45 72-73 NO. NAME P.B. Pg. 11 AUTOZONE STORE #4855 AT HOME - DEPOT OF NAPLES 50 54 12 NAPLES CENTER VILLAGE 58 95-98 13 NAPLES INFINITI - VOLVO 61 84-85 14 15 16 17 18 19 9511S 9514N9510S 9512S9511N ZONING NOTES1 PU-81-15C2 R-84-25C3 R-87-1C4 PU-84-19C5 R-87-38C6 1-9-90 V-89-17 90-87 8-23-88 PU-88-14 88-1918 "DELETED"9 1-7-91 PUD-91-13 92-110 4-5-94 CU-93-23 94-23211 5-10-94 PUD-84-25(1) 94-25; DOA-94-1 94-212 5-23-95 R-95-2 95-3813 9-12-95 V-95-7 95-53114 11-24-98 V-98-8 98-47615 4-11-00 V-00-6 00-10916 4-10-01 CU-00-21 01-12417 9-28-04 DOA-04-AR-5317 04-31018 9-25-12 LDC ORD. 12-3819 3-13-07 PUDZ-05-AR-8550 07-3220 3-13-07 DOA-05-AR-8543 07-6321 9-25-14 SV-PL-14-256 HEX 14-26SCALE 0400 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A PAGE OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS REFERRED TO AND ADOPTED BY REFERENCE BY ORDINANCE NO. 04-41 OF THE COUNTY OF COLLIER, FLORIDA, ADOPTED JUNE 22, 2004, AS AMENDED BY THE ZONING NOTES AND SUBDIVISION INDEX REFERENCED HEREON. INDICATES SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY 5/16/17 3.E.f Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) May 24, 2019 Collier County Growth Management Department Planning & Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-2400 Reference: Chick-fil-A #1721 / Naples 5825 Airport Pulling Road N. Naples, FL 34109 IP # 2017.0173 Project Narrative Please accept this project narrative as part of our submittal for an Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) for the redevelopment of the existing Chick-fil-A at this location. As part of the scope of work for the project, Interplan has included a proposed reduction in the northern landscape buffer of 7.5’ (to 1.5’ - 7’, width varies, refer to C-2.0 Site Dimension Plan) as well as a parking reduction from 46 required to 43 proposed, which in addition, had been approved previously by the County through APR-205-AR-8167 to 41 spaces. Thus, overall the proposed site results in a net gain of 2 additional parking spaces. The proposed site improvements require a reduction in the parking area to allow area for an additional drive-thru lane to be located within the site and adjacent to the building. This lane allows for traffic to drive within the limits of the existing Porte cache and the proposed Face to Face (F2F) canopy. It has been determined that the majority of Chick Fil-A’s business (approximately 79%) occurs through the drive-thru. The allowance for more traffic to circle the building within these lanes will allow for more interior vehicular stacking as well as improve the efficiency of the delivery time through the proposed building expansion, which includes a kitchen expansion, and will not increase the seating capacity of the restaurant or number of employees working. The reduction in the northern landscape buffer is requested to provide the width necessary for the drive aisle. This reduction from existing 7.5’(15’ shared), will allow for landscaped area from 1.5’ – 7’ wide within Chick Fil-A property at the northern property line. The reduction also increases the drive aisle width as necessary to accommodate an additional lane as well as 3.E.f Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Chick-fil-A #1721/ Naples May 24, 2019 Page 2 of 4 allow for large truck traffic for items such as garbage disposal and access to proposed dumpster location to be conducted at off-peak hours. The existing buffer north of and adjacent to Chick Fil-A will remain with mature landscaping as you can see from the photo below, taken May 17, 2019. In addition to this proposed site plan, additional alternatives were reviewed with Collier County Staff at the Pre-Application Meeting which was held February 6, 2019 at 3:00 p.m. The options included the following: Pre- App Notes (as taken by Sara Guntrum): Originally, Chick Fil-A (CFA) submitted an application for a variance to existing site requesting removal of our portion (7.5’) of shared northern 15’ landscape buffer as part of S&R project. x This option was not supported by County, and Collier County’s attorney stated IP would not receive their support at the Commission Hearing for this alternative because removing a buffer 3.E.f Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Chick-fil-A #1721/ Naples May 24, 2019 Page 3 of 4 was unprecedented and not something that has been approved in the past, the landscaped area has traditionally been relocated on-site when approved for removal of a buffer. x Collier County’s Lead Planner, James Sobo, discussed the following Alternatives: o Option #1 – (PREFERRED OPTION) reduce buffer and relocate landscaping within the limits of CFA leased parcel. x This option could be completed through PDI – Insubstantial Change Revision to PUD. o Option #2 – request CFA to enter into an agreement with an adjacent lease to utilize additional parking and replace existing onsite parking with removed landscaping / green space area to balance CFA site. x This option would require a deviation through PDI process as Insubstantial Change to PUD; and would require a section to be added to the current PUD as “Deviation” for the purpose of relocating and maintaining parking / landscaped area. x (Note:Relocating landscaped area to another lease site within the PUD was reviewed by Collier County Planning Coordinator for acceptance at their level prior to submitting this option for approval). o Option #3 – request CFA to apply for a change to layout of current property limits approved in PUD by pushing out western property line and drive aisle,while maintaining landscape buffer and adding parking and landscaped area within limits of this new site area. x This option requires a property line adjustment and additional property lease on behalf of CFA. x This option could be done within limits of current application process for SPDI, showing the property line changes to be recorded into the PUD as well as giving the remaining departments the ability to review the site and comment. o Also as part of the discussion, it was determined that the proposed building addition was within maximum building SF in CFA’s existing lease agreement as well as within the original PUD; it was determined that CFA is not yet at their maximum building area threshold with this proposed addition. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. If I am unavailable, Sara Guntrum, the Project Manager, will be able to answer your questions. 3.E.f Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Chick-fil-A #1721/ Naples May 24, 2019 Page 4 of 4 Sincerely, INTERPLAN LLC Kendra Lewis Permit Manager Cc: S. Guntrum; S. Anderson; IP File 3.E.f Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) UTILITY CONTACTSCONTACTS UTILITY NOTESGENERAL NOTES VICINITY MAPSITE DATA INDEX TO DRAWINGS LEGAL DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY STANDARD NOTES: PINE AIR LAKES PUD, Ord. 07-32 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT TABLE: COLLIER COUNTY ENG / UTILITY NOTES: THIS DOCUMENT IS "NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION" UNLESS THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL APPEAR BELOW. AA 003420 CA 8660 604 COURTLAND STREET SUITE 100 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32804 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING INTERIOR DESIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT 3.E.f Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) PermitPermit Information contained on this drawing and in all digital files produced for above named project may not be reproduced in any manner without express written or verbal consent from authorized project representatives. MLD PROJECT # PRINTED FOR DATE SHEET SHEET NUMBER DRAWN BY Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 REVISION SCHEDULE FSU#CHICK-FIL-A2018153 9.7.18 ADNNaples Center FSU5825 Airport Pulling Rd NNaples, FL 341091721 NO.DATE DESCRIPTION EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN PD-100 1 10/15/18 Site Plan Changes 2 1/16/19 City Comments 3 3/8/19 Client Comments 4 3/15/19 Site Plan Changes 5 3/21/19 Site Plan Changes 6 5/29/19 City Comments 7 7/3/19 City Comments 8 10/22/19 City Comments 0 20 40 FT 11.14.19TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCN 01°08'21" E 347.00' P&MAIRPORT ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 31) 200' R/WCL100'BPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWGRASS MEDIAN20' DEPB 43, PGS 74 & 75 N 89°14'40" E 260.67' PLAT LOT 2 TRACT A PB 43, PGS 74 & 75PB 43, PGS 74 & 75(FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, ACCESS ESMT)TRACT A16 CO T EB UPTR SIGN STOP BARSD BARSTOPBARSTOPBARSTOP DUMPSTER YELLOW LINE EM SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD S D S D S D SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDSD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDS A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N SAN SANSANSANSANSAN 11.9 ' 6.9' GM PROPOSED 15' X 20' UTILITY EASEMENT WWW W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWTTTTT T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T B P C B P C B P C B P C B P C B P C BPC BPC BPC BPC BPC BPC BPC BPC BPC BPC BPC BPC BPC BPC BPC BPC W BP C BP C BP C BP C BP C W W W WSETBACK LINE1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1920 21 22 23 24 25 2627 28 29 3031323334 TV 35 36 37 38 3912.0612.13GG G G G G G G GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG G G GCW N 89°15'16" E 260.60' MEAS 174.69' PLAT 174.54' MEASSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDBARSTOPSITE BENCHMARK # ELEVATION = DATUM = SDSDSDSD SD SD SDSDSDBARSTOPADAPAD WIDTH 60.5' HOLLYWOOD DRIVE (PRIVATE)SDFH EXISTING 1 STORY PRE-FABRICATED CONC FFE = 13.16' EX.4,050 SQ. FT. HOLL Y W O O D DRIV E (ACCESS ESMT HOLLYWOOD DRIVE TREE CHART 1 - 13" PALM 2 - 14" PALM 3 - 7" OAK 4 - 10" OAK 5 - 6" OAK 6 - 10" BLACK OLIVE 7 - 8" BLACK OLIVE 8 - 2-3" MAGNOLIA 9 - 10" BLACK OLIVE 10 - 4" MAGNOLIA 11 - 10" BLACK OLIVE 12 - 9" BLACK OLIVE 13 - 10" BLACK OLIVE 14 - 4" MAGNOLIA 15 - 11" PALM 16 - 9" PALM 17 - 14" PALM 18 - 6" OAK 19 - 10" PALM 20 - 11" PALM 21 - 6" HOLLY 22 - 6" HOLLY 23 - 11" PALM 24 - 10" PALM 25 - 13" PALM 26 - 13" PALM 27 - 9" PALM 28 - 6" OAK 29 - 4" MAGNOLIA 30 - 7" PIGEON PLUM 31 - 6" PIGEON PLUM 32 - 8" PIGEON PLUM 33 - 7" PIGEON PLUM 34 - 7" PIGEON PLUM 35 - 11" PALM 36 - 11" PALM 37 - 13" PALM 38 - 6" PIGEON PLUM 39 - 6" PIGEON PLUM 3.E.f Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Information contained on this drawing and in all digital files produced for above named project may not be reproduced in any manner without express written or verbal consent from authorized project representatives. MLD PROJECT # PRINTED FOR DATE SHEET SHEET NUMBER DRAWN BY Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 REVISION SCHEDULE FSU#Pine Air Lakes PUD2018153 9.7.18 SLMNaples Center FSU5825 Airport Pulling Rd NNaples, FL 341091721 NO.DATE DESCRIPTION PD-101CHICK-FIL-ADeviation #1 Landscape Exhibit 0 20 40 FT LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS Collier County , FL A.BUFFER REQUIRED 1.East Type "D" Airport Rd 175 LF @ 1 tree/30 LF =5 trees; Plus double row of shrubs North Shared Type "A"261 LF-21 LF drive= 240 LF @ 1 tree/30 LF =8 trees North Buffer area = 240 x 7.5 =1800 SF West Type "D"175 LF-68 LF drives= 107 LF @ 1 tree/30 LF =4 trees; Plus double row of shrubs South Type "D"255 LF @ 1 tree/30 LF =8 trees; Plus double row of shrubs PROVIDED 1.East Type "D" Airport Rd 6 Ex Black Olive (6,7,9,11,12,13)Row of Cocoplum added to ex shrubs North Shared Type "A"Deviation allows for planting of buffer in other areas on site. 3 Ex Mags (8,10,14) on East Buffer, 3 Pigeon Plums, 1 Maple (west buffer, rear of bldg), 1 Maple (SE corner)=8 trees North Buffer Deviation Area =654 SF West Type "D"1 Ex Mag (29), 1 Ex Oak (28), 2 Dahoon Holly counts as 1 (21,22), 2 Ex Palm(20,23)+New Palm counts as 1 = 4 Trees Row of Cocoplum added to ex shrubs South Type "D"3 Ex Oak (3,4,18), 3 Maple, 3 Oak = 9 Trees Row of Cocoplum added to ex shrubs Total Deviation North =654 SF Compensation provided for Deviation in other areas (shown in purple)=764 SF 110 SF Surplus B.INTERIOR VUA REQUIRED 1.VUA = 26180 SF; Interior LS area = 10% of VUA =2618 SF 2.1 Tree/250 SF of Interior LS area =10 Trees PROVIDED 1.2620 SF interior landscape areas provided (see green shaded area) 2.2 Ex Palms (1,2) + 1 Palm counts as 1 tree, 7 Maple, 2 Pigeon Plum =10 Trees total C.BUILDING FOUNDATION REQUIRED 1.25 % of the combined total of all building façade length × (Width) 10' wide = (Area) Total Planting Area Required. 325 LF x 10' x 25%=812.5 SF 2.Trees and Palms @ 1/300 SF of required foundation planting =2.7 or 3 Trees or Palms PROVIDED 1.821 SF foundation landscape areas provided (see yellow shaded area) 2.Palm counts as 1, 2 Simpson Stopper =3 Trees BUFFER COMPENSATION AREA TOTAL 764 SF X EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING BUFFER TREE TO REMAIN LEGEND INTERIOR VUA LANDSCAPE AREA 2620 SF BUILDING FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE AREA 822 SF ORANGE SHADE WITH DASH OUTLINE ARE EXISTING TREES TO COMPENSATE FOR TREE LOSS IN NORTH BUFFER NORTH BUFFER AREA ENCROACHMENT 654 SF EXISTING BUFFER TO REMAIN PROPOSED TREES ORANGE SHADE ARE PROPOSED TREES TO COMPENSATE FOR TREE LOSS IN NORTH BUFFER NOTE: ALL PROHIBITED EXOTIC VEGETATION SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND IT SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF EXOTICS IN PERPETUITY. (LDC 3.05.08) XX TGAS X X N 01°08'21" E 347.00' P&MBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWEB SIGN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1920 21 22 23 24 26 28 29 39 STOPBAR CWCWCWXXXXXXXXX X XX X X NORTH 7.5' TYPE "A" LS BUFFER WEST 10' TYPE "D" LS BUFFER SOUTH 10' TYPE "D" LS BUFFER EAST 20' TYPE "D" LS BUFFER Deviation Compensation Area X NORTH BUFFER AREA ENCROACHMENT Deviation Compensation Area EXISTING TREES IN NORTH BUFFER BELONG TO PARCEL TO NORTH Deviation Compensation Area Deviation Compensation Area NOTE: Group of three (3) Palms removed , to be counted as one (1) Tree 4.2.20 3.E.f Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) October 15, 2019 Collier County Zoning Division ATTN: Camden Smith 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-2400 Reference: Chick-fil-A #1721 / Naples 5825 Airport Pulling Road N. Naples, FL 34109 Petition Number: PL20190000194 Neighborhood Informational Meeting (NIM) Summary Please be advised that a Neighborhood Informational Meeting (NIM) was held for the above- referenced project on Thursday, October 3, 2019 at 6:00pm at the Collier County Library located at 2385 Orange Blossom Drive. In attendance was Sara Guntrum and Kendra Lewis, of Interplan, LLC, Chris Gregory and P.J. Rodriguez of Chick-fil-A and Gil Martinez of Collier County. There was no public opposition to this proposed project as there were no members of the community present. The meeting was adjourned at 6:28 pm, a recording of which has been provided to Collier County staff. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. If I am unavailable, Sara Guntrum, the Project Manager, will be able to answer your questions. Sincerely, INTERPLAN LLC Kendra Lewis Permit Manager Cc: S. Guntrum; S. Hickman; S. Anderson; IP File 3.E.f Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) McMAHON ASSOCIATES, INC. 2090ȱPalmȱBeachȱLakesȱBoulevard,ȱSuiteȱ400ȱ WestȱPalmȱBeach,ȱFLȱ33409ȱ pȱ561Ȭ840Ȭ8650ȱ|ȱfȱ561Ȭ840Ȭ8590ȱ PRINCIPALS JosephȱW.ȱMcMahon,ȱP.E.ȱ JosephȱJ.ȱDeSantis,ȱP.E.,ȱPTOEȱ JohnȱS.ȱDePalmaȱ WilliamȱT.ȱSteffensȱ CaseyȱA.ȱMoore,ȱP.E.ȱ GaryȱR.ȱMcNaughton,ȱP.E.,ȱPTOEȱ ASSOCIATES JohnȱJ.ȱMitchell,ȱP.E.ȱ ChristopherȱJ.ȱWilliams,ȱP.E.ȱ R.ȱTrentȱEbersole,ȱP.E.ȱ MatthewȱM.ȱKozsuch,ȱP.E.ȱ MaureenȱChlebek,ȱP.E.,ȱPTOEȱ DeanȱA.ȱCarr,ȱP.E.ȱ ȱ ȱȱ Engineering | Planning | Design | Technology mcmahonassociates.com Octoberȱ16,ȱ2018ȱ ȱ VIAȱEȬMAILȱ ȱ Mr.ȱSeanȱHickman,ȱP.E.ȱȱ INTERPLANȱ 604ȱCourtlandȱStreet,ȱSuiteȱ100ȱ Orlando,ȱFLȱ32804ȱ ȱ RE:ȱ ChickȬfilȬAȱ#1721ȱTrafficȱAnalysisȱ McMahonȱProjectȱNo.ȱH18708.01ȱ ȱ DearȱMr.ȱHickman:ȱ ȱ McMahonȱ Associates,ȱ Inc.ȱ (McMahon)ȱ hasȱ completedȱ aȱ trafficȱ analysisȱforȱ theȱexpansionȱ ofȱ aȱ ChickȬfilȬ A,ȱ locatedȱatȱ 5825ȱ AirportȱPullingȱ Roadȱ N,ȱ inȱ theȱ Cityȱ ofȱ Naples,ȱ Florida.ȱȱTheȱ siteȱ currentlyȱ includesȱaȱ 4,050Ȭsquareȱ footȱ ChickȬfilȬAȱ withȱ driveȬthroughȱ facility.ȱȱTheȱ proposedȱ development,ȱ withȱ anȱ anticipatedȱ buildoutȱ yearȱ ofȱ 2020ȱ willȱ includeȱ anȱ additionalȱ 543ȱ squareȱ feetȱ toȱ theȱ buildingȱ forȱ aȱ totalȱ proposedȱbuildingȱintensityȱofȱ4,593ȱsquareȱfeet.ȱȱȱ ȱ TheȱtrafficȱstudyȱmethodologyȱprovidedȱtoȱCollierȱCountyȱstaffȱisȱattachedȱinȱAppendixȱA.ȱȱTheȱproposedȱ siteȱplanȱisȱattachedȱinȱAppendixȱB.ȱȱFigureȱ1ȱgraphicallyȱdepictsȱtheȱsiteȱlocation.ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱ Trip Generation Analysis Usingȱ tripȱ generationȱ informationȱ obtainedȱ fromȱ theȱ Instituteȱ ofȱ Transportationȱ Engineersȱ (ITE),ȱ Tripȱ GenerationȱManual,ȱ10thȱEdition,ȱtripȱgenerationȱestimatesȱwereȱdevelopedȱforȱtheȱexistingȱandȱproposedȱ landȱ usesȱ forȱ theȱ site.ȱȱInternalȱ captureȱ betweenȱ theȱ ChickȬfilȬAȱ andȱ otherȱ retailȱ usesȱ inȱ theȱ immediateȱ vicinityȱ wasȱ assumedȱ toȱ beȱ 20ȱ percentȱ basedȱ onȱ coordinationȱ withȱ Collierȱ Countyȱ staff,ȱ andȱ ITEȱ Tripȱ GenerationȱHandbook,ȱ2ndȱEdition.ȱȱPassȬbyȱCaptureȱofȱ50ȱpercentȱforȱAMȱandȱPMȱpeakȱhourȱconditionsȱ wasȱbasedȱonȱCollierȱCountyȱtrafficȱstudyȱguidelines.ȱȱPassȬbyȱcaptureȱforȱdailyȱconditionsȱwasȱ40ȱpercentȱ (10ȱ percentȱ lessȱthanȱtheȱ peakȱ hour)ȱ wasȱ basedȱ onȱ Collierȱ Countyȱ trafficȱ studyȱ guidelines.ȱȱInformationȱ obtainedȱ fromȱ ITEȱ isȱ attachedȱ inȱ Appendixȱ C.ȱȱTableȱ 1ȱ indicatesȱ thatȱ theȱ proposedȱ developmentȱ isȱ expectedȱtoȱgenerateȱanȱincreaseȱofȱ122ȱdailyȱtrips,ȱnineȱ(9)ȱAMȱpeakȱhourȱtrips,ȱandȱsevenȱ(7)ȱPMȱpeakȱ hourȱtripsȱwhenȱcomparedȱtoȱtheȱtripsȱgeneratedȱbyȱtheȱexistingȱdevelopment.ȱȱȱȱȱ 3.E.f Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Figure 1 Site Location Chick-Fil-A #1721 Traffic Analysis Naples, Florida Pine Ridge Road Airport Pulling Road NNaples BoulevardCougar Drive SITE 3.E.f Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) ITE CODE IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL %IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL % IN OUT TOTAL Fast Food with Drive Through 934 4,050 SF T= 470.95 (X)50% 50% 954 953 1,907 191 190 381 20.0% 763 763 1,526 305 305 610 40% 458 458 916 Fast Food with Drive Through 934 4,593 SF T= 470.95 (X)50% 50% 1,082 1,081 2,163 217 216 433 20.0% 865 865 1,730 346 346 692 40% 519 519 1,038 NET DIFFERENCE 128 128 256 26 26 52 102 102 204 41 41 82 61 61 122 Fast Food with Drive Through 934 4,050 SF T= 40.19 (X) 51% 49% 83 80 163 17 16 33 20.0% 66 64 130 33 32 65 50% 33 32 65 Fast Food with Drive Through 934 4,593 SF T= 40.19 (X) 51% 49% 94 91 185 19 18 37 20.0% 75 73 148 37 37 74 50% 38 36 74 NET DIFFERENCE 11 11 22 2 2 4 9 9 18 4 5 9 5 49 Fast Food with Drive Through 934 4,050 SF T= 32.67 (X) 52% 48% 69 63 132 14 12 26 20.0% 55 51 106 27 26 53 50% 28 25 53 Fast Food with Drive Through 934 4,593 SF T= 32.67 (X) 52% 48% 78 72 150 16 14 30 20.0% 62 58 120 30 30 60 50% 32 28 60 NET DIFFERENCE 9918224 7714347 437 TOTAL TRIPS PROPOSED USE PROPOSED USE AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR (2) Internal capture between the Chick-fil-A and other retail uses based on coordination with Collier County and the Insitute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition. TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION ANALYSES CHICK-FIL-A #1721 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS EXISTING USE EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE LAND USE IN OUT (3) Pass-by Capture for AM and PM peak hours based on Collier County guidelines. Pass-by capture for daily conditions was 40 percent (10 percent less than the peak hour) per Collier County guidelines. INTERNAL TRIPS(2)EXTERNAL TRIPS PASS BY TRIPS (3)NEW TRIPS DAILY EXISTING USE INTENSITY TRIP GENERATION RATE (1) (1) Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. F:\FL\18708H_Interplan_Chick-fil-a Traffic Analysis (Naples)\H18708_01\TrafficAnalysis\Analysis Tables.xls 3.E.f Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Sean Hickman, P.E. October 16, 2018 Page 4 Roadway Significance Analysis Aȱroadwayȱsignificanceȱanalysisȱwasȱperformedȱforȱtheȱfirstȱroadwayȱsegmentsȱinȱeitherȱdirectionȱofȱtheȱ projectȱ site.ȱȱAȱ roadwayȱ isȱ determinedȱ toȱ beȱ significantȱ whenȱ theȱ anticipatedȱ projectȱ tripsȱ onȱ theȱ firstȬ accessedȱ roadwayȱ segmentȱ exceedȱ twoȱ (2)ȱpercentȱ ofȱtheȱ minimumȱroadwayȱstandardȱforȱ theȱroadwayȱ segment.ȱȱ ȱ Theȱ firstȬaccessedȱ roadwayȱ segmentsȱ inȱ eitherȱ directionȱ ofȱ theȱ projectȱ siteȱ areȱ Pineȱ Ridgeȱ Roadȱ andȱ Airportȱ Pullingȱ Roadȱ N.ȱȱPineȱ Ridgeȱ Roadȱ andȱ Airportȱ Pullingȱ Roadȱ Nȱ areȱ sixȬlaneȱ roadwaysȱ nearȱ theȱ projectȱ site.ȱȱBasedȱ onȱ theȱ minimumȱ standardȱ andȱ serviceȱ volumeȱ listedȱ inȱ theȱ 2017ȱ Annualȱ Updateȱ Inventoryȱ Reportȱ (AUIR),ȱ theȱ peakȱ hour,ȱ directionalȱ roadwayȱ serviceȱ volumeȱ forȱ Pineȱ Ridgeȱ Roadȱ isȱ 2,800ȱ vehiclesȱ perȱ hourȱ (vph)ȱ forȱ theȱ segmentsȱ eastȱ andȱ westȱ ofȱ Naplesȱ Boulevard.ȱȱTheȱ peakȱ hour,ȱ directionalȱroadwayȱserviceȱvolumeȱforȱAirportȱPullingȱRoadȱNȱisȱ3,000ȱvphȱonȱtheȱsegmentsȱnorthȱandȱ southȱ ofȱ Naplesȱ Boulevard.ȱȱBothȱ roadwayȱ segmentsȱ haveȱ aȱ minimumȱ Levelȱ ofȱ Serviceȱ Eȱ standard.ȱȱ Excerptsȱfromȱtheȱ2017ȱAUIRȱareȱattachedȱinȱAppendixȱD.ȱȱȱ ȱ Duringȱ theȱ PMȱpeakȱ hour,ȱ theȱ proposedȱ ChickȬfilȬAȱ expansionȱ willȱ generateȱ anȱ increaseȱ ofȱ fourȱ (4)ȱ netȱ newȱ inboundȱ tripsȱ andȱ threeȱ (3)ȱ netȱ newȱ outboundȱ trips.ȱȱTheȱ inboundȱ andȱ outboundȱ tripsȱ wereȱ distributedȱtoȱPineȱRidgeȱRoadȱandȱAirportȱPullingȱRoadȱNȱbasedȱonȱaȱreviewȱofȱexistingȱlandȱusesȱandȱ roadwayȱ characteristicsȱ forȱ theȱ surroundingȱ area.ȱȱFigureȱ 2ȱ andȱ Figureȱ 3ȱ graphicallyȱ depictȱ theȱ projectȱ distributionȱandȱprojectȱ trips,ȱrespectively.ȱȱȱȱResultsȱofȱ theȱ roadwayȱsignificanceȱ analysis,ȱsummarizedȱ inȱ Tableȱ 2,ȱ indicateȱ thatȱ theȱ proposedȱ ChickȬfilȬȱ Aȱ expansionȱ willȱ notȱ haveȱ aȱ significantȱ impactȱ onȱ theȱ firstȱaccessedȱsegmentsȱofȱPineȱRidgeȱRoadȱorȱAirportȱPullingȱRoadȱN.ȱ ȱ Roadway Capacity Analysis Projectȱgeneratedȱtripsȱwereȱaddedȱtoȱtheȱ2017ȱvolumesȱfromȱtheȱAUIRȱtoȱdetermineȱtheȱtotalȱanticipatedȱ volumeȱ forȱ theȱ studyȱ roadwayȱ segments.ȱȱTableȱ 3ȱ summarizesȱ theȱ existingȱ andȱ projectedȱ volumesȱ forȱ Pineȱ Ridgeȱ Roadȱ andȱ Airportȱ Pullingȱ Roadȱ Nȱ andȱ comparesȱ theȱ volumesȱ toȱ theȱ serviceȱ volumes.ȱȱ Accordingly,ȱ theȱ calculatedȱ totalȱ volumesȱ doȱ notȱ exceedȱ theȱ serviceȱ volumesȱ forȱ theȱ studyȱ segmentȱ ofȱ AirportȱPullingȱRoadȱN.ȱȱTheȱstudyȱsegmentȱofȱPineȱRidgeȱRoadȱisȱexpectedȱtoȱexceedȱtheȱserviceȱvolume.ȱȱ However,ȱtheȱprojectȱwillȱaddȱaȱmaximumȱofȱoneȱ(1)ȱtripȱtoȱthisȱroadwayȱsegmentȱandȱwill,ȱthereforeȱnotȱ haveȱaȱsignificantȱimpact.ȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱ Conclusion Givenȱ theȱ lowȱ numberȱ ofȱ peakȱ hourȱ tripsȱ anticipatedȱ fromȱ theȱ proposedȱ ChickȬfilȬAȱ expansion,ȱ theȱ projectȱ willȱ notȱ haveȱ aȱ significantȱ impactȱ onȱ Pineȱ Ridgeȱ Roadȱ orȱ Airportȱ Pullingȱ Roadȱ N.ȱȱTotalȱ futureȱ volumesȱ onȱ Airportȱ Pullingȱ Roadȱ Nȱ willȱ notȱ exceedȱ theȱ serviceȱ volume.ȱȱTotalȱ volumesȱ onȱ Pineȱ Ridgeȱ Roadȱwillȱexceedȱtheȱserviceȱvolume.ȱȱȱȱȱ ȱ ȱ ȱȱ 3.E.f Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Figure 2 Project Distribution Pine Ridge Road Airport Pulling Road NNaples BoulevardCougar Drive 25% 25% 25% 25% (15%) (25%)55%(10%)(40%) 55% (15%)80% (50%) 25% Chick-Fil-A #1721 Traffic Analysis Naples, Florida (25%)(15%)(25%) 25% 25% 5% (15%) 20% 5% (10%) LEGEND Project Driveway XX% Inbound Distribution (XX%) Outbound Distribution Chick-fil-A 3.E.f Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Figure 3 Project Trips – PM Peak Hour Pine Ridge Road Airport Pulling Road NNaples BoulevardCougar Drive 1 1 201 2 13 1 1 Chick-Fil-A #1721 Traffic Analysis Naples, Florida 10 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 Chick-fil-A 3.E.f Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Eastbound 6LD 2,800 25% IN 1 0.04% No Westbound 2,800 25% OUT 1 0.04% No Eastbound 6LD 2,800 5% IN 0 0.00% No Westbound 2,800 15% OUT 0 0.00% No Northbound 6LD 3,000 55% IN 2 0.07% No Southbound 3,000 65% OUT 2 0.07% No Northbound 6LD 3,000 55% IN 2 0.07% No Southbound 3,000 80%/15% IN/OUT 4 0.13% No Northbound 6LD 3,000 25% OUT 1 0.03% No Southbound 3,000 25% IN 1 0.03% No (1) Source: Collier County 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Report Airport Pulling Rd N 2.2 PROJECT TRIPS PROJECT IN/OUT MOVEMENT ID#(1) 66 LOS "E" SERVICE VOLUME(1) Airport Pulling Rd Site Driveway Naples Blvd 2.2 2.2 Naples Blvd 66 TABLE 2 ROADWAY SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS - PM PEAK HOUR CHICK-FIL-A #1721 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ROADWAY FROM TO FACILITY TYPE PROJECT DISTRIBUTION SIGNIFICANT IMPACT > 2%?DIRECTION Pine Ridge Rd PROJECT SIGNIFICANCE Pine Ridge Rd Shirley St Site Driveway Naples Blvd Orange Blossom Dr Naples Blvd F:\FL\18708H_Interplan_Chick-fil-a Traffic Analysis (Naples)\H18708_01\TrafficAnalysis\Analysis Tables.xls 3.E.f Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Pine Ridge Rd Shirley St Naples Blvd 66.0 EB 6LD 2,800 2,390 6.22% 474 52 474 2,864 1 2,865 Yes Naples Blvd Airport Pulling Rd 66.0 EB 6LD 2,800 2,390 6.22% 474 52 474 2,864 0 2,864 Yes Airport Pulling Rd N Pine Ridge Rd Site Driveway 2.2 NB 6LD 3,000 1,860 2.00% 114 94 114 1,974 2 1,976 No Site Driveway Naples Blvd 2.2 NB 6LD 3,000 1,860 2.00% 114 94 114 1,974 2 1,976 No Naples Blvd Orange Blossom Dr 2.2 NB 6LD 3,000 1,860 2.00% 114 94 114 1,974 1 1,975 No (1) Source: Collier County 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Report. Growth rate for link on Airport Pulling Road was 1.64%. Therefore, 2% was used for analysis based on Collier County guidelines. TO BACKGROUND (2020) CONDITIONS(1) TABLE 3 ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS - PM PEAK HOUR CHICK-FIL-A #1721 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDITIONAL VOLUME WITH %CGR PEAK HOUR, PEAK DIR SERVICE VOLUME(1) EXISTING (2017) VOLUME(1)PROJECT TRIPS ROADWAY FROM TOTAL (2020) CONDITIONS ID#(1)DIR.FACILITY TYPE EXCEEDS CAPACITY?CGR%TRIP BANK GROWTH USED BACK. VOLUME TOTAL VOLUME F:\FL\18708H_Interplan_Chick-fil-a Traffic Analysis (Naples)\H18708_01\TrafficAnalysis\Analysis Tables.xls 3.E.f Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Sean Hickman, P.E. October 16, 2018 Page 9 Shouldȱyouȱhaveȱanyȱquestionsȱorȱcommentsȱregardingȱtheseȱfindings,ȱpleaseȱdoȱnotȱhesitateȱtoȱcallȱme.ȱ ȱ Sincerely,ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ____________________________ȱ NataliaȱThaisȱLercari,ȱP.E.ȱ ProfessionalȱEngineerȱ LicenseȱNo.ȱ68205ȱ StateȱofȱFlorida,ȱBoardȱofȱProfessionalȱEngineersȱ CertificateȱofȱAuthorizationȱNo.ȱ4908ȱ ȱ NTL/ccȱ Attachmentȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ F:\FL\18708H_Interplan_ChickȬfilȬaȱTrafficȱAnalysisȱ(Naples)\H18708_01\Report\LtrSH101618.docxȱ Digitally signed by Richard T Ebersole Date: 2018.11.12 12:53:17 -05'00' 3.E.f Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ APPENDIXȱAȱ ȱ METHODOLOGYȱLETTERȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ 3.E.f Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.fPacket Pg. 762Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.fPacket Pg. 764Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ APPENDIXȱBȱ ȱ SITEȱPLANȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ 3.E.f Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.fPacket Pg. 767Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ APPENDIXȱCȱ ȱ INSTITUTEȱOFȱTRANSPORTATIONȱENGINEERSȱ TRIPȱGENERATIONȱINFORMATIONȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ 3.E.f Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Land Use: 934 Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window Description This category includes fast-food restaurants with drive-through windows. This type of restaurant is characterized by a large drive-through clientele, long hours of service (some are open for breakfast, all are open for lunch and dinner, some are open late at night or 24 hours a day) and high turnover rates for eat-in customers. These limited-service eating establishments do not provide table service. Non-drive-through patrons generally order at a cash register and pay before they eat. Fast casual restaurant (Land Use 930), high-turnover (sit-down) restaurant (Land Use 932), fast-food restaurant without drive-through window (Land Use 933), and fast-food restaurant with drive-through window and no indoor seating (Land Use 935) are related uses. Additional Data Users should exercise caution when applying statistics during the AM peak periods, as the sites contained in the database for this land use may or may not be open for breakfast. In cases where it was confirmed that the sites were not open for breakfast, data for the AM peak hour of the adjacent street traffic were removed from the database. The outdoor seating area is not included in the overall gross floor area. Therefore, the number of seats may be a more reliable independent variable on which to establish trip generation rates for facilities having significant outdoor seating. Time-of-day distribution data for this land use for a weekday, Saturday, and Sunday are presented in Appendix A. For the 46 general urban/suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 11:45 a.m. and 12:45 p.m. and 12:00 and 1:00 p.m., respectively. For the one dense multi-use urban site with data, the same AM and PM peak hours were observed. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alaska, Alberta (CAN), California, Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 163, 164, 168, 180, 181, 241, 245, 278, 294, 300, 301, 319, 338, 340, 342, 358, 389, 438, 502, 552, 577, 583, 584, 617, 640, 641, 704, 715, 728, 810, 866, 867, 869, 885, 886, 927, 935, 962, 977 156 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Services (Land Uses 900–999) 3.E.f Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 9HKLFOH7ULS(QGVYV 6T)W*)$ 2QD :HHNGD\ 6HWWLQJ/RFDWLRQ *HQHUDO8UEDQ6XEXUEDQ 1XPEHURI6WXGLHV  $YJ6T)W*)$  'LUHFWLRQDO'LVWULEXWLRQ HQWHULQJH[LWLQJ 9HKLFOH7ULS*HQHUDWLRQSHU6T)W*)$ $YHUDJH5DWH 5DQJHRI5DWHV 6WDQGDUG'HYLDWLRQ    'DWD3ORWDQG(TXDWLRQ ; 6T)W*)$ Trip Generation Manual,WK(GLWLRQ ,QVWLWXWHRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ(QJLQHHUV7 7ULS(QGV6WXG\6LWH $YHUDJH5DWH )LWWHG&XUYH(TXDWLRQ1RW*LYHQ 5ð       3.E.f Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 9HKLFOH7ULS(QGVYV 6T)W*)$ 2QD :HHNGD\ 3HDN+RXURI$GMDFHQW6WUHHW7UDIILF 2QH+RXU%HWZHHQDQGDP 6HWWLQJ/RFDWLRQ *HQHUDO8UEDQ6XEXUEDQ 1XPEHURI6WXGLHV  $YJ6T)W*)$  'LUHFWLRQDO'LVWULEXWLRQ HQWHULQJH[LWLQJ 9HKLFOH7ULS*HQHUDWLRQSHU6T)W*)$ $YHUDJH5DWH 5DQJHRI5DWHV 6WDQGDUG'HYLDWLRQ    'DWD3ORWDQG(TXDWLRQ ; 6T)W*)$ Trip Generation Manual,WK(GLWLRQ ,QVWLWXWHRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ(QJLQHHUV7 7ULS(QGV6WXG\6LWH $YHUDJH5DWH )LWWHG&XUYH(TXDWLRQ1RW*LYHQ 5ð        3.E.f Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 9HKLFOH7ULS(QGVYV 6T)W*)$ 2QD :HHNGD\ 3HDN+RXURI$GMDFHQW6WUHHW7UDIILF 2QH+RXU%HWZHHQDQGSP 6HWWLQJ/RFDWLRQ *HQHUDO8UEDQ6XEXUEDQ 1XPEHURI6WXGLHV  $YJ6T)W*)$  'LUHFWLRQDO'LVWULEXWLRQ HQWHULQJH[LWLQJ 9HKLFOH7ULS*HQHUDWLRQSHU6T)W*)$ $YHUDJH5DWH 5DQJHRI5DWHV 6WDQGDUG'HYLDWLRQ    'DWD3ORWDQG(TXDWLRQ ; 6T)W*)$ Trip Generation Manual,WK(GLWLRQ ,QVWLWXWHRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ(QJLQHHUV7 7ULS(QGV6WXG\6LWH $YHUDJH5DWH )LWWHG&XUYH(TXDWLRQ1RW*LYHQ 5ð       3.E.f Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ APPENDIXȱDȱ ȱ 2017ȱAUIRȱINFORMATIONȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ 3.E.f Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil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f Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil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f Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil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f Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 11/5/2018 Chick-Fil-A #1721 NAPLES, FL Project # :2017.0173 5825 AIRPORT PULLING ROAD NORTH NAPLES, FL 34109 DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL Sanitary Sewer PVC Pipe, SDR 35, 4" 35 LF $5.75 $201.25 PVC Pipe, SDR 35, 6" 14 LF $8.05 $112.70 Trench 4' deep, 3/8 C.Y. bucket 70 LF $10.34 $723.80 Wastewater Appurtenances Grease Trap, precast, 1,000-gallon 2 EA $3,600.00 $7,200.00 Soil Stabilization & Subgrade Grade Subgrade for Base Course (large parking lots) 128 SY $1.17 $149.76 Base Course Crushed 1-1/2" Stone Base, compacted to 6" 128 SY $9.15 $1,171.20 Flexible Paving Asphaltic concrete, Binder Course, 2" 128 SY $9.70 $1,241.60 Rigid Paving Curbs and Gutters Concrete Curb, 6" x 18" (radius), wood forms 15 LF $23.00 $345.00 Medium Voltage Transformer $12,000.00 Transformer (Up to 300 KVA) 1 EA $12,000.00 $12,000.00 Total $23,145.31 TOTAL ESTIMATED VALUE:$23,145.31 Notes: This Cost Estimate is based on RSMeans Site Work & Landscape Costs Data, 34th Annual Edition, 2015. It is subject to change based on final site design and actual contractor bid. Mobilization and Equipment Rentals are not included. Stuart Anderson P.E. FL Reg. #60848 Page 1 of 1 7KLVLWHPKDVEHHQHOHFWURQLFDOO\VLJQHGDQGVHDOHGE\6WXDUW$QGHUVRQ RQXVLQJD6+$DXWKHQWLFDWLRQFRGH3ULQWHGFRSLHVRIWKLV GRFXPHQWDUHQRWFRQVLGHUHGVLJQHGDQGVHDOHGDQGWKH6+$ DXWKHQWLFDWLRQFRGHPXVWEHYHULILHGRQDQ\HOHFWURQLFFRSLHV dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesosoosoooosoooosoooosoosooooooooooosooooooooosoooooosooooooooosoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosoooooosoooooooooooososoooon nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn P.PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP E. 60808080808080808008080808080808080808008888080888808808888888888888880808888080888808808088088888080808080808808088808080888808080880808888888888888888888888888888888888088484848444484888488488884844884848884884888488888888888888848888884848888884884888484888884884888888884848848488848884888888848848 OHFWURQLFDOO\VLJQHGDQGVHDOHGE\6WXDUW$QGHUVRQ D6+$DXWKHQWLFDWLRQFRGH3ULQWHGFRSLHVRIWKLV W LG G L G G O G G WK 6+$ Digitally signed by Stuart Anderson Date: 2018.11.19 10:06:04-05'00' 3.E.f Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.fPacket Pg. 778Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 3.E.fPacket Pg. 779Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, Table 2.4, which permits neighboring industrial/commercial zoned properties to share a 15’ landscape buffer, with each abutting property contributing 7.5’, to instead allow a reduction of the 7.5’ portion of the landscape buffer on the northern side of the Chick-fil-A parcel to a varying width of 4” to 7.5’. The encroached buffer area and removed trees from the reduced buffer area shall be re-allocated elsewhere on the Chick Fil A parcel and supplemental understory trees shall be provided where practical in the north buffer, as specified in the Site Development Plan. Petitioner’s Justification: Section 4.06.02, Table 2.4 of the LDC allows a fifteen foot (15’) shared buffer of neighboring industrial/commercial zoned properties, with each abutting property contributing 7.5’. The proposed deviation requests to reduce the Chick-fil-A portion of the shared northern landscape buffer to varying widths of 4” to 7.5’ and reallocating the greenspace and affected understory trees elsewhere on site. The reduction of the Chick-fil-A 7.5’ portion of the northern buffer will allow for the addition of a second drive through lane with the addition of a face-to-face order meal delivery canopy as well as widening of the northern drive aisle. The reduction of the landscape buffer is the minimum distance required to provide for the second drive through lane, a 20’ fire truck access path and angled parking between the existing building and the property line. A greater number of patrons will be able to be served simultaneously with the implementation of a second drive-through lane and face-to-face meal delivery canopy. Furthermore, the second drive-through lane will significantly reduce traffic congestion on site, circulate drive-through patrons more rapidly and relieve traffic flow from backing up into drive aisles of the Pine Air Lakes PUD. Compliant with Section 10.02.13.E.2 of the LDC, the requested deviation does not warrant a substantial or minor change based on evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13.E.1. Approval of this deviation will not change the boundary of the PUD or the density and or intensity of the permitted land uses, which are considered substantial changes. With no change in density or intensity, traffic counts for the project will be unchanged by the requested deviation. Similarly, with no change in uses or intensity, the project remains consistent with the Growth Management Plan and compatible with adjacent uses. Because the deviation only changes the width of the Chick-fil-A 7.5’ portion of the northern landscape buffer and the reduced greenspace within the northern buffer will be reallocated on site, the deviation will not decrease preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas within the development, nor will it increase the size of areas used for nonresidential uses. The deviation will not impact stormwater retention or discharges, as the proposed change is consistent with the approved Environmental Resource Permit. The proposed change is to a PUD district that is not designated as a DRI and does not impact any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described in Section 10.02.13.E.1 in the Land Development Code. 3.E.f Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) TREE CHART1 - 13" PALM2 - 14" PALM3 - 7" OAK4 - 10" OAK5 - 6" OAK6 - 10" OAK7 - 8" OAK8 - 2-3" MAGNOLIA9 - 10" OAK10 - 4" MAGNOLIA11 - 10" OAK12 - 9" OAK13 - 10" OAK14 - 4" MAGNOLIA15 - 11" PALM16 - 9" PALM17 - 14" PALM18 - 6" OAK19 - 10" PALM20 - 11" PALM21 - 6" OAK22 - 6" OAK23 - 11" PALM24 - 10" PALM25 - 13" PALM26 - 13" PALM27 - 9" PALM28 - 6" OAK29 - 4" MAGNOLIA30 - 7" UNIDENTIFIED31 - 6" UNIDENTIFIED32 - 8" UNIDENTIFIED33 - 7" UNIDENTIFIED34 - 7" UNIDENTIFIED35 - 11" PALM36 - 11" PALM37 - 13" PALM38 - 6" UNIDENTIFIED39 - 6" UNIDENTIFIED1. BEARING STRUCTURE IS ASSUMED AND BASED ON THE MONUMENTED WESTR/W LINE OF AIRPORT ROAD, BEING S 01°08'21" W (PLAT).2. THIS SURVEY REFLECTS ONLY MATTERS OF RECORD AS PROVIDED BY THECLIENT OR CLIENTS REPRESENTATIVE.3. THIS SURVEY WAS MADE ON THE GROUND. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIESSHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTINGDRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICEOR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THEUNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATEDALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY ASPOSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLYLOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.4. THIS BUILDING/LOT LIES IN ZONE "X", BASED ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPNO. 12021C0384H, COMMUNITY NO. 120067, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, EFFECTIVEMAY 16, 2012.5. ACCORDING TO FLORIDA STATUTES, CHAPTER 472.025, A LAND SURVEYORSHALL NOT AFFIX HIS SEAL OR NAME TO ANY PLAN OR DRAWING WHICH DEPICTSWORK WHICH HE IS NOT LICENSED TO PERFORM OR WHICH IS BEYOND HISPROFESSION OR SPECIALTY THEREIN. THEREFORE, WE ARE UNABLE TO CERTIFYAS TO MUNICIPAL ZONING COMPLIANCE, INTERPRETATION OF ZONING CODES ORTHE DETERMINATION OF VIOLATIONS THEREOF.6. THIS SURVEY WAS MADE WITHOUT BENEFIT OF TITLE.7. THIS SURVEY IS VALID ONLY FOR THE PARTIES TO WHOM IT IS CERTIFIED.8. THIS SURVEY EXCEEDS THE ACCURACY REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN FLORIDASTATUTES.9. ELEVATIONS BASED ON ABB NAIL & DISK IN WOOD POWER POLE AT NORTHEASTCORNER OF AIRPORT ROAD AND PINE RIDGE ROAD, BEING: 12.33 FEET, (NGVD 29)AND CONVERTED TO (NAVD 88), BEING: 11.07 FEET, USING VERTCON.LEGAL DESCRIPTIONNOTESCOPYRIGHT © 1986 - 2016, ACCURIGHT SURVEYSS:\COLLIER\CC43-74 - Pine Air Lakes Unit Five\Chick-fil-A\CC43-74-CFA-ADJ-SPC.dwg - Jun 25, 2019ACCURIGHT SURVEYS OF ORLANDO INC., LB 44752012 E. Robinson Street, Orlando, Florida 32803www.AccurightSurveys.netACCU@AccurightSurveys.netPHONE: (407) 894-6314DRAWN BY: GLTJOB #47794SUBDIVISION NAME:CF#SCALE: 1" = 20'FIELD DATE: 10-19-17PREPARED FOR:LOCATION:CC43-74-CFA-ADJ-SPCINTERPLAN LLCBY:REVISIONDATE: JOB #10-19-17BOUNDARY SURVEY DATE:per 5J-17.051(3)(b)3 Florida Administrative CodeTSBTRUPTTPTB - TOP OF BANK- TRAFFIC POLE- TRAFFIC SIGN- TRANSFORMER/JUNCTION BOX- TELEPHONE RISER- TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOXTSW - TRAFFIC SIGNAL WIRE-T- - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE- STORM INLET- STORM MANHOLE-S- - SANITARY LINESDO - SHOWN FOR DIRECTION ONLY- SANITARY MANHOLERCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPER/W - RIGHT OF WAYCOFHEMEBTV- MITERED END SECTION#PLAT OF SURVEYGMBB - BOTTOM OF BANKBC - BACK OF CURB- BACK FLOW PREVENTER- BENCHMARK-BPC- - BURIED POWER CABLEBWF - BARBED WIRE FENCE- CABLE TV RISER-C- - BURIED CABLE TVCALC - CALCULATEDC&M - CALCULATED & MEASUREDΔ- CENTRAL ANGLECBW - CONCRETE BLOCK WALLCC - COVERED CONCRETECF - CONCRETE FLUMECHW - CONCRETE HEAD WALLCLF - CHAIN LINK FENCEMF - METAL FENCEML - METAL LIDMS - METAL SHED- DOT INLETLEGENDDP - DUMPSTER PADDW - DRIVEWAY- EASEMENT NUMBER#############################SV- CENTERLINECM - CONCRETE MONUMENTCMP - CORRUGATED METAL PIPE- CLEAN OUTCONC - CONCRETECOVD - COVEREDCP - CONCRETE PADCW - CONCRETE WALKWAYD&M - DEED/DESC & MEASUREDDE - DRAINAGE EASEMENTDESC - DESCRIPTION- ELECTRIC METER- ELECTRICAL BOXEL - ELEVATIONESMT - EASEMENTEP - EDGE OF PAVEMENTFIRM - FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPFFE - FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION- FIRE HYDRANT-FM- - FORCE MAINFND - FOUNDFOC - FIBER OPTIC CABLE-F- - FIBER OPTIC CABLE LINE-G- - GAS LINE- GAS METER - GUY WIRE ANCHOR- MONITORING WELLN&D - NAIL & DISKNAVD - NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUMNGVD - NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUMNTS - NOT TO SCALEOHE - OVERHEAD ELECTRICORB - OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK-OW- - OVERHEAD WIREPB - PLAT BOOKPC - POINT OF CURVATUREPEP - PER ENGINEERING PLANSPG - PAGEPI - POINT OF INTERSECTIONP&M - PLAT & MEASURED- HANDICAP PARKINGHDPE - HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENEINV - INVERT ELEVATIONIP - IRON PIPEIR - IRON RODL- ARC LENGTHLB - LICENSED BUSINESS- LIGHT POLELBE - LANDSCAPE BUFFER ESMTLSA - LANDSCAPED AREAMEAS - MEASUREDPOB - POINT OF BEGINNINGPOC - POINT OF COMMENCEMENTPRC - POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE# PS - PARKING SPACESPSM - PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPERPOT - POINT OF TANGENCYPVC - PLASTIC PIPER - CURVE RADIUSTYP - TYPICALUE - UTILITY EASEMENT- UTILITY POLE-W- - WATER LINEWF - WOOD FENCEWS - WOOD SHED- WATER VALVE- WATER METERSN - SIGNSWF - STOCK WIRE FENCEx00.00 - SPOT ELEVATION-SD- - STORM/DRAIN LINE - SEWER VALVEPINE AIR LAKES5825 AIRPORT ROAD, NORTH NAPLES, FLORIDA.40'1" = 20'60'10'0'20'BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHIC AND TREE SURVEYSHEET 1 OF 1VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE)"NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISEDSEAL OF THIS FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER."ORTHE DIGITAL SEAL APPEARING ON THIS DOCUMENT WASAUTHORIZED BY RONALD K. SMITH, PSM 5797.NESWNESWUNIT FIVEDigital Signer:IGC CA 1DN:CN=RONALD K SMITH, OU=A01427E000001661FAAE8A700003AE8, O=Unaffiliated, C=USDate:2019.06.25 06:37:03 -04:003.E.fPacket Pg. 781Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) .,,,,,303',, '_(o~ ... -~~. /!Jcv • -) \ ~ --~. a \ _.. CD ORDINANCE NO. 07-_3_2 __ "c\ ~ "' :: ~o~ tf>.1(1, AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY 61 9l491,g\'f'i COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIA TE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICA TION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) TO COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS PINE AIR LAKES CPUD TO ALLOW AN INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT AREA. THE SUBJECT 148.99 ACRES IS LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 31), PARALLEL TO AND APPROXIMATELY 1,600 FEET NORTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 896); AND ALONG BOTH SIDES OF NAPLES BOULEVARD, IN SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 94-25, THE PINE AIR LAKES PUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ~-..1' ,.--. r, •. ,, t ~ l~::-~ <.:. .,> ~~ :;: '. --~ , •. Cl r·· ,c.~,(,.\ .. -- ; ~) ;:_i-:-i (.,J WHEREAS, Airport Road Limited Partnership, represented by Karen Bishop, of P.M.S. Inc., of Naples and Richard Yovanovich, of Goodlette, Coleman and Johnson, P.A., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 11, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from Planned Unit Development (PUD) to Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) known as the Pine Air Lakes CPUD in accordance with the CPUD Docwnent, attached hereto as Exhibit "A11 which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps as described in Ordinance Nwnber 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingl y. SECTION TWO: Ordinance Nwnber 94-25, known as the Pine Air Lakes PUD, adopted on May 10, 1994 by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety. Petition Number PUDZ-2005-AR-8550 Page I of 2 r-1 . ._, 3.E.f Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DUL Y ADOPTED, b,? the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 12.__ day of ~ fu.rvh , 2007. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Approved as to _form and legal sufficiency . Dkv~'L1-:Lffa 1-{)f+<h:· -4l· -f)t,i_,~~ • Maj e M. Student-Stirling '1 Assistant County Attorney Petition Number PUDZ-2005-AR-8550 Th'5 OA1inonce fi led with thc ~~,y of Stote's Office tho ~ da)' offYt'Jtta, at)Q J- ~ adcnowledgement of tliot ~thisil!!t!bdoy o/ ~ a;~=~ 0( C _., • • Page 2 of2 3.E.f Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) PINE AIR LAKES A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY AIRPORT ROAD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AMENDEDBY: Goodlette Coleman & Johnson 4001 Tamiami Trail N., Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 EXHIBITA ORIGNINAL ORDINANCE NUMBER 85-67 -----------DA TE ISSUED _____ l l_/1_2/_85 ____ _ DATE APPROVED BY CCPC ----------- DATE APPROVED BY BCC ----=-3-----'l=-=3=----=2=0-=0-=--7 __ _ ORDINANCE NUMBER ___ 2_0_0_7-3 2 PUD documentw sec changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 3.E.f Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBJECT Property Ownership and Description Statement of Compliance Project Development Office Regional Comrnercial Lake/Open Space Development Standards Utility Services Development of Regional Impact PUD Master Plan Legal Description Interconnection Exhibit PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc SECTION Section I Section II Section III Section IV Section V Section VI Section VII Section VIII Section IX Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" 3.E.f Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION SECTION I 1.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed tobe developed under the project name of Pine Air Lakes. 1. 02 INTRODUCTION lt is the intent of Airport Road Limited Partnership, a Florida limi ted partnership (here and after to be called Applicant) to amend a Planned Unit Development on approximately 150 acres of property located in northwest Collier County, Florida. 1.03 NAME The development will be known as Pine Air Lakes. 1.04 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is currently under the ownership of: Airport Road Limited Partnership 800 Seagate Drive, Suite 302 Naples, FL 34103 1.05 UNIFIED CONTROL The property being submitted for rezoning is under the unified control of Airport Road Limited Partnership. 1.06 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject project being +/-148 .99 acres is located in northwest Collier County, Section 11, Township 49 south, Range 25 east. The complete legal description is set forthin Exhibit "B". 1.07 GENERAL LOCATION A. The subj ect property is west of and contiguous to Airport Road, parallel to and approximately 1,600 feet north of Pine Ridge Road; approximately 1,300 feet west, the boundary jogs south then west again approximately 1,300 feet, parallel to Pine Ridge Road. B. Four (4) accesses to the developrnent will be provided as conceptually depicted on Exhibit "A". Three (3) entrances will have access from Airport Road and one (1) access will be from Pine Ridge Road, taking advantage of the existing Naples Boulevard. Pine Ridge Road is scheduled to be the primary access into western Collier County from Interstate 75. Regional access to the Pine Air Lakes development will be via Interstate 75 and Pine Ridge Road Interchange and Airport Road Transportation Corridors. Developers and property owners are to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code as described in Policy 7 .1 of the Future Land Use Element. 1.08 EXISTING ELEVATION The +/-150 acres of land which Pine Air Lakes is comprised of has an average elevation of plus 10.0 feet above sea level. PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07 .doc 2 3.E.f Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 1.09 EXISTING SOIL TYPES The Pine Air Lakes site is composed of five (5) soil types as identified by the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service in their report titled, "Soil Survey, Detailed Reconnaissance, Collier County, Florida. Series 1942, No. 8, issued March 1954. "The site is primarily composed of Keri Fine Sand approximately forty-five percent ( 45%) and Charlotte Fine Sand approximately eighteen percent (18%). The Arzell Fine Sand, Cypress Swamp, and Ochopee Fine Sand Marl (shallow phase) makes up the remaining thirty-seven percent (37%) of the Pine Air Lakes CPUD site. The Ochopee Fine Sand Marl (shallow phase) is characterized by a shallow depth to rock which is typified by its exposure in the roadway swale along Pine Ridge Road (south of the project site). 1.10 EXISTING VEGETATION The site area has been historically stripped ofnative vegetation and utilized for agricultural and horticultural purposes. The only remaining native vegetation exists in the cypress head areas, (this has been designated "S.T.'' by the County Environmentalist), approximately in the center of the southem property line. The cypress ("S.T.'') area will be left in its natural state under the proposed Pine Air Lakes CPUD Master Plan. The historical agricultural uses of the property supports a request for waiver of the Environrnental Impact Statement (E.I.S.) commonly required by the Land Development Code. The request for a waiver has been filed with the County Environmentalist. NOTE: See Benedict's Letter. 1.11 OPEN SPACE. A minimum of thirty percent (30%) of total acres shall be provided. ( 44. 7 acres) 1.81 acres are provided in S.T. acres and 32.64 acres are provided in Lakes/Open Space. The open space to be within the developed parcels along with the S.T. and Lake/Open Space parcels will either meet or exceed the required acreage. PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07 .doc 3 3.E.f Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE SECTION II 2. 0 I PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to briefly outline the Pine Air Lakes Commercial Planned Unit Development compliance with the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. 2.02 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of approximately 150 acres of property in, northwest Collier County, Florida, Section 11 (eleven), Township 49 south, Range 25 east, as a Planned Unit Development to be known as Pine Air Lakes will comply with the planning and development objectives of Collier County. A. This project is a Development of Regional Impact that predates the adoption of the 1989 Growth Management Plan for Collier County. As such, it was deemed to have vested zoning rights through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program described in former Policy 3.1K ofthe Future Land Use Element. B. Properties that have been found to have vested zoning rights are deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (reference Policy 5.9, FLUE). Policy 5.1 of the Future Land Use Element allows changes to such projects, provided the intensity of development is not increased. PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 4 3.E.f Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SECTION III 3. O I PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan of development and general conditions of the Pine Air Lakes Project. 3.02 GENERAL A. Regulations for development of Pine Air Lakes shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, CPUD-Commercial Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts ofthe "Collier County Land Development Code". B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code. 3.03 TRACT DEVELOPMENT The development of separate tracts shall comply with the Collier County Land Development Code, when applicable. 3 .04 PROJECT PLAN AND LAND USE PARCELS A. The project plan including the location of roadways, general circulation, and the land use is illustrated graphically and conceptually on the CPUD Master Plan (Exhibit "A"). B. Areas illustrated as Lakes/Open Space on Exhibit "A" are illustrative only, and are subject to relocation and reconfiguration. These areas may be constructed as lakes or open space. A portion of the lakes may be constructed as shallow, intermittent dry depressions for water detention purposes. C. In addition to the various areas shown on Exhibit "A", such easements (utility, private, semi-public, etc.) shall be established within or along the various tracts as may be necessary or deemed desirable for the service, function or convenience of the project users. D. Adjacent parcels, whether owned by the same or different entities, shall be permitted to be developed under a Unified Development Plan as a single shopping center or single office complex with common and shared parking areas, access drives, utilities, entries, common areas and other facilities typically contained within a shopping center or office complex. Interna! tract boundaries in such unified development plans shall not be required to have lot line setbacks or buffers. Additionally, buildings within the Unified Development Plan shall be permitted to abut one another as long as all appropriate building codes have been adhered to without any requirement for property line setbacks along comrnon property lines with adjacent buildings. 3.05 BUFFERS A. All parcels within the Pine Air Lakes development adjacent to interior roads shall provide a minimum fi fteen ( 15) foot wide landscape strip buffer. (Excluding parcels designated Lakes/Open Space.) PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 5 3.E.f Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) B. A minimum buffer fi fteen ( 15) feet wide will be provided along all parcels ( except Lake/Open Space parcels) which are adjacent to surrounding land presently zoned industrial/commercial. A minimum twenty (20) foot buffer will be provided along Airport Raad. C. All other buffers shall meet the minimum standards of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of development ofthe parcel. D. No parking, outside display signs, or other structures shall be located within buffers. 3.06 SPECIAL TREATMENT (S. T.) REGULATION The S. T. zoning overlay is removed and the approximate 1.8 acres of wetlands shall be preserved as a separate tract or easement, with protective covenants. An average twenty-five (25) foot setback will be provided around the wetlands area. No parking, outside displays, signs or structures shall be located within the setback around the wetlands area. 3.07 CPUD SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL The provisions of Section 04.07.01 of the Collier County Land Development Codeshall apply to the development of platted tracts or other parcels of land prior to issuance of a building permit or other development order. 3.08 DEVELOPMENT PLAN ADJUSTMENT Minor variations in acreage, roadway, lakes and tract boundaries, as shown on CPUD Master Plan shall be permitted at final design to accommodate topography, vegetation, and other site conditions. Minor variations shall be defined as in the Land Development Code in effect at the time such variation is requested. 3.09 MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE USES: The maximum square footage tobe constructed within the CPUD shall be as follows. The permitted uses for each category of use shall be as set forth herein in Section 4 with respect to Office Uses and in Section 5 with respect to Regional Commercial/Retail Uses. Category Regional Commercial/Retail Office Total Square Feet 1,000,000 75,000 1,075,000 3.10 CONVERSION BETWEEN USB CATEGORIES. Notwithstanding the maximum square footage uses set forthin Paragraph 3.09 above, the Developer shall have the right to; Convert office space into retail space or retail space into office space, with the conversion rate between the different uses to be set forth as follows (the conversion rate has been determined by an equivalent trip generation analysis). Up to 50,000 square feet of office area can be converted into retail area at the rate of 100 square feet of additional retail area for every 420 square feet of office area converted. Additionally, up to 50,000 square feet of retail area can be converted into office area at the rate of 100 square feet of additional office area for every 24 square feet of retail area converted. The maximum square footage allowed is 1,075,000. PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 6 3.E.f Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) OFFICE SECTION IV 4.01 PURPOSE. The pmpose of this section is to indicate the development plan land regulations for any part of the site tobe developed for office uses. 4.02 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES. No building or structure or part thereof shall be erected, altered, or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part for other than the following: 4.03 PERMITTED PRINCIP AL USES AND STRUCTURES 1) Business and professional offices; banks; financial institutions. 2) Churches and other places of worship; civic and cultural facilities; colleges, universities and schools. 3) Funeral homes. 4) Hornes for the aged; hospitals; hospices and sanitoriums. 5) Medical laboratories; medical clinics; medical offices for humans; mortgage brokers; museums. 6) Parking garages and lots; private clubs. 7) Real estate offices; research design and development activities; rest homes; convalescent centers; and nursing homes. 8) Laboratories, provided that: a) No odor, noise, etc., detectable to normal senses from off the premises are generated; b) All work is done within enclosed structures; and c) No product is manufactured or sold, except incidental to development activities. 9) Transportation, communication and utility offices -not including storage of equipment. 10) Any professional or commercial use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals determines to be compatible in the district. 4.04 PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES 1) Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with uses permitted in this district. 2) Caretaker's residence. 3) Multi-story parking. 4) Water management structures and facilities. 4.05 REGULATIONS 405.01 General -All yards, setbacks, etc., shall be in relation to the individual parcel boundaries. 405.02 Minimum Parcel Area -Twenty thousand (20,000) square feet. PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 7 3.E.f Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 405.03 Minimum Parcel Width -One hundred (100) feet. 405.04 Minimum Yard Requirements -abutting the roadway within the Pine Air Lakes Development and Airport Road to the west of the development shall be front yards. a) Front Yard -Twenty-five (25) feet. b) Side Yard -Fifteen (15) feet with unobstructed passage from front to rear yard. c) Rear Yard-Fifteen (15) feet. d) Minimum Yard Requirement From Any Residentially Zoned or Use Property: Twenty-five (25) feet. 405.05 Maximum Height -Five (5) stories or fifty (50) feet, whichever is greater over a maximum of two (2) levels of parking. Ten (10) stories or one hundred (100) feet, whichever is greater over two (2) levels of parking may be approved through Site Development Plan Approval and by the Planning Commission. 405.06 Minimum Floor Area of Structures -One thousand (1,000) square feet per building on the ground floor. 405.07 Minimum Distance Between Structures -Thirty (30) feet or one-half (1/2) the sum of the height, whichever is greater. 4.06 SIGNAGB As permitted or required by the Land Development Code in effect at the time a permit is requested. 4.07 MINIMUM OFF-STREBT PARK.ING AND OFF-STREBT PARKING LOADING REOUIREMBNTS As permitted or required by the Land Development Code in effect at the time a permit is requested. 4.08 MINIMUM LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS As permitted or required by the Land Development Code in effect a the time a permit is requested . 4.09 MINIMUM LANDSCAPB/BUFFBR AREA Defined in Section 3.05 ofthis Document. PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 8 3.E.f Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) REGIONAL COMMERCIAL SECTIONV 5.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to indicate the development plan land regulations for the areas designated on Regional Commercial. In order to ensure that regional retail is achieved, there will be a minimum of two individual retail uses with a minimum of 70,000 square feet of gross leasable area (GLA) each. These three uses, along with a majority of the commercial uses shall be restricted to uses herein which also would be within Division G, Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987 publication. 5.02 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following. 5.03 PERMITTED USES The following uses are expressly permitted when done in accordance with the general intent of this ordinance: a) Antique shops 5932; appliance stores 5722; art galleries 5999, 8412; art studios 8999; art supply shops 5199; assembly in enclosed building 3549; auction hause 5999; automobile parts stores 5531; automobile service stations with repairs in enclosed building 5541; automobile sales, and associated Service departments, 5541, 5511; alcoholic beverage sales, including sales for consumption on or offthe premises 5813, 5921. b) Banks and financial institutions Major Groups 60, 61, 62, 67; barber and beauty shops 7231, 7241; bath supply stores 5719; bicycle sales and services 7699 ( excluding Cesspool cleaning), 5941, 5091, 5571; blueprint shops 7334; boat sales -with inside storage 5551, 5091; bookbinders 2789, 2732; book stores 5192, 5961; business (i.e. Xerox) machine services 7359, 7629; bakery shops, including baking only when incidental to retail sales from the premises 5461; business offices 8741, 8742, 8748. c) Carpet and floor covering sales which may include limited storage (not to exceed 50% of retail sales area) 5713, 5023; enclosed car washes 7542; clothing stores 5137, 5651, 5611, 5932, 5136, 5621; cocktail lounges 5813; commercial recreation uses -indoor 7999 ( excluding animal shows, bath houses, circus companies, shooting ranges/galleries, skeet shooting); commercial schools 8222, 8211, 8221; communications services and equipment repair 5065; confectionery and candy stores 5441, 5145; churches and other places of worship 8661; civil and cultural facilities 8641, 8299, 8611, 8621; colleges, universities and schools 8211, 8221, 8222, 8299, 8243, 8244, 8249; child care centers 8351; convalescent centers 8059, 8051; children's homes 8361. d) Department stores 5311; dry goods stores 5131, 5999: drapery shops 5023, 5714; delicatessens 5461; drug stores 5912, 5122; dry cleaning -collecting and delivering only 7212. (Minimal on-site pressing and spotting permitted). PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07 .doc 9 3.E.f Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) e) Electrical supply stores 5063; equipment rentals -including lawn mowers, power saws, etc. without outside storage and display 7359; employment agencies 7361, 7819, 7922 (excluding burlesques companies), 7363. f) Fish markets (retail)_5421, 5146; florist shops 5992, 5193; fratemal and social clubs 8641; funeral homes 7261 ( excluding crematories); fumiture refinishing 7641; fumiture stores 5712, 5021; furrier shops 5632. g) Garden supply stores, which can include outside displays, gift shops 5261; glass and mirror sales 5231, 5719; gourmet shops 5499, 5411; gunsmiths 7699 ( excluding cesspool cleaning). h) Hardware stores 5251; hat cleaning and blocking 7251; health food stores 5499; health clubs/fitness centers 7991; hobby supply stores 5092, 5945; hospitals and hospices 8069, 8062. i) Ice cream shops 5451, 5143; ice sales (not including ice plants) 5143, 5999. j) Jewelry stores 5094, 5944, 5632. k) Kitchenware shops 5719. 1) Laundries 7211; lawn maintenance shops no outside maintenance 7699; leather goods 5199, 5948; legitimate theaters 7922 (excluding burlesque companies); light manufacturing or processing (including food processing, but not slaughter house) Major Group 23 (excluding 2371) & 39. Packaging or fabricating in completely enclosed building 2671.Linen supply shops 7213; liquor stores 5921, 5182; and locksmiths 7699; lithographing 2752; laboratories; provided no odor, noise, vibrations or other nuisance detectable to normal senses from off the premises are generated 7819,8734,8071,8072. m) Marinas 4493; markets -food of every type 5411; medical office and clinics 8041, 8021, 8042, 8031, 8011, 8043, 8093; millinery shops 5632, 5131; miscellaneous uses such as mail express office, telephone exchange 7331, 5999; motion picture theaters 7832; motorcycle sales and service 5571, 7699 (excluding cesspool cleaning), 5012; museums 8412; music stores 5735, 5736; mortgage brokers 6162, 6163; motels 7011; meat, fish and poultry markets 5421, 5499. n) Newspaper stores 5994. o) Office Supply stores 5112, 5943. p) Paint and wallpaper stores 5231; parking garages (enclosed) 7521; pest control service 7342; pet shops 5999; pet supply shops 5999, 5149, 5199; photographic equipment stores 5043, 5946; plumbing shop 5074; plumbing supplies 5074; pottery stores 5719; poultry markets 5499; printing 2732, 2752,2759; publishing or similar establishments 2741, 2731, 2711, 2721; private clubs 7997; professional offices 8741, 8742, 8748; post offices 4311, 7389. q) Quilt shops 5949. r) Radio and television stations and transmitters 4832, 4833; radio and television sales and services 5731, 7622; interior non- destructive and design labs 8711, 8712; rest homes 8059, 8361; PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 10 3.E.f Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) restaurants including fast food restaurants with drive through window service 5812; real estate offices 6531; research, design and development planning facilities 8748. s) Service establishments catering to commerce and industry 7389; sign company 3993, 5046, 5099; sign painting shops 3993; shoe repair 7251; shoe stores 5661; shopping centers (including regional facilities) Major Group 53, 56, 57, 58, 59; souvenier stores 5947; stationery stores 5943; supermarkets 5411; swimming pool maintenance shops 7389; sanitoriums 8063; schools 8211, 8249. t) Tailor shops 7219, 5699; taxidermists 7699; tile sales -ceramic tile 5211, 5032; tobacco shops 5159, 5194, 5993; toy shops 5945, 5092; tropical fish stores 5999; transportation terminals without outside storage ofvehicles or equipment 4231; tavems 5813. u) Upholstery shops 5714. v) Varietystores 5331; vehicle rentals 7514, 4119; veterinarian offices and clinics -no outside kennels 0742; vocational, technical, trade or industrial schools 8211, 8249. w) Water bed sales 5712, 5021. x) X-ray clinics 8071. y) Yacht sales 7389, 5551. z) Any other commercial, which is compatible in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Apeals determines tobe consistent with the purpose of the district. aa) All uses allowed in Section IV. * All references to numbers in this Section are understood to be to Standard Industrial Classification Groups. 5.04 PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with uses permitted in this district: 1) Caretaker residence. 2) Water management structures and facilities. 3) Customary accessory uses and structures. 5.05 REGULATIONS 505.01 General -All yards, setbacks, etc., shall be in relation to the individual parcel boundaries. There shall be no outside ovemight storage or display on any parcels in this section. 505.02 Minimum Parcel Area -As determined at the time of Preliminary Site Development Plan review. 505.03 Minimum Parcel Width -As determined at the time of Preliminary Site Development Plan review. 505.04 Minimum Yard Requirements -The parcel sides abutting the roadway within the Pine Air Lakes· Development and Airport Road to the west of the development shall be front yards. Those parcels shall conform to the minimum yard PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 11 3.E.f Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) requirement of Section 4.05.4 of the Document. All other parcels in this Section shall conform to the following: a) Front Yard -Twenty-five (25) feet. b) Side Yard and Rear Yard -None or a minimum of five (5) feet wi th unobstructed passage from front to rear yard. c) Other parcel boundaries fifteen ( 15) feet. 505.05 Maximum Height -Three (3) stories or thirty-five (35) feet, whichever is greater. 505.06 Minimum Floor Area of Principal Structures -One thousand (1,000) square feet per building on the ground floor. 505.07 Minimum Distance Between Structures, -Same as side yard setback. 5.06 SIGNAGE As permitted or required by the Land Development Code in effect at the time a permit is requested. 5.07 MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARK.ING AND OFF-STREBT LOADING REQUIREMENTS As permitted or required by the Land Development Code in effect at the time a permit is requested. 5. 08 MINIMUM LANDSCAPING REOUIREMENTS As permitted or required by the Land Development Code in effect at the time a perrnit is requested. 5.09 MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA Defined in Section 3.05 ofthis Document. PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 12 3.E.f Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) LAKE/OPEN SPACE SECTION VI 6.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to indicate the development plan land regulations for the areas tobe utilized for Lakes/Open Space. 6.02 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered, or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 6.03 PERMITTED PRINCIP AL USES AND STRUCTURES l) Sidewalks constructed for purposes of access to or passage through common areas. 2) Lakes and other storm water management facilities or uses to serve for the water management and drainage of project. 3) Picnic areas, parks and passive recreation areas. 4) Small buildings, enclosures or other structures constructed for purposes of maintenance, storage, recreation or shelter with appropriate screening and landscaping. 5) Small docks, p1ers or other such facilities constructed for purposes of lake recreation for project occupants or members. 6) Decks and platforms associated with restaurant and entertainment facilities on adjacent parcels shall be allowed to project into Lake/Open Space parcels. 7) A lake/open space parcel may be considered a buffer for developed parcels if it is adj acent to the parcel. 8) Any other open space activity which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals determines to be compatible in the district. 6.04 PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the uses permitted in this district. l) Customary accessory uses of recreational facilities . 2) Any other recreational use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals determines to be compatible in the district. PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07 .doc 13 3.E.f Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 6.05 REGULATIONS 605.01 General -All yards, setbacks, etc., shall be in relation to the individual parcel. 605.02 Minimum Lot Area: None 605.03 Minimum Lot Width: None 605.04 Minimum Yard Reguirements: Abutting the arterial roadway within the Pine Air Lakes Development and Airport Road to the west of the development shall be front yards. a) Front Yard: Fifty (50) Feet b) Side Yard: Thirty (30) Feet c) Rear Yard: Fifty (50) Feet 605.05 Maximum Height of Structures: Thirty-five (35) feet unless otherwise approved during Development Review. 6.06 SIGNAGE As permitted or required by the Land Development Code in effect at the time a permit is requested. 6.07 MINIMUM OFF-STREBT PARKING AND OFF-STREBT LOADING REOUIREMENTS As permitted or required by the Land Development Code in effect at the time a permit is requested. 6.08 MINIMUM LANDSCAPING REOUIREMENTS As permitted or required by the Land Development Code in effect at the time a permit is requested. 6.09 MINIMUM LANDSCAPE/BUFFER AREA Defined in Section 3.05 of this Document. PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 14 3.E.f Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS SECTION VII 7.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the standards for the development of the project. 7 .02 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with the Final Development Plan and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the current official County Land Development Codeshall apply to this project. 7.03 CPUD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN A. Exhibit "A" illustrates the proposed development. B. The design criteria and system design illustrated on Exhibit "A" and stated herein shall be understood as flexible so that the final design may best satisfy the project, the neighborhood and the general local environment. Minor site alterations may be permitted subject to planning staff and administrative approval. C. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all areas in the project. 7.04 CLEARING. GRADING, EARTHWORK, AND SITE DRAINAGE All clearing, grading, earthwork, and site drainage work shall be performed in accordance with all applicable State and local codes. 7.05 STREETS All streets shall be dedicated to the public. The petitioner wishes to reserve the right to maintain and landscape the unpaved portions of the right-of-way for roads within the project subject to the approval of the Development Services Director. All public street design and construction shall meet the Collier County standards that are in effect at the time of approval. 7.06 SIGNS As permitted or required by the Land Development Code in effect at the time a permit is requested. 7.07 HOUSING To satisfy the project's affordable housing impacts cumulatively the applicant's mitigation for commercial and office uses shall be $206,424 .00. These funds shall be paid to Collier County Affordable Housing Trust Fund at issuance of building permit. If more than one building permit is involved, then the payments shall be prorated on a .50 cent per square foot basis and a portion collected at the time each building permit is issued. PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 15 3.E.f Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 7.08 LANDSCAPING A) For off-street parking areas -All landscaping for off-street parking areas shall be in accordance with the appropriate portion of the Land Development Code. B). For Naples Boulevard Land Improvements -The Pine Air Lakes CDD shall complete the installation of the Naples Boulevard. right-of-way landscaping as approved by Collier County Transportation Mode Department but will be limited to $400,000.00 in cost. The Pine Air Lakes CDD shall maintain the right-of-way landscaping in perpertuity. The installation shall take place within one year of this PUD amendment and the companion DRI Development Order amendment approval. 7.09 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW The petitioner intends to create an associaöon to review individual parcel layout and architecture prior to the improvement of any parcel. 7.10 COMMON AREA MANAGEMENT The petitioner intends to convey the common areas, including the water retention and surface water management structures, to Pine Air Foundation, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, which will be responsible for implementation of the surface water management plan and have authority to assess the other lands within the district for the costs of such maintenance. The petitioner would also grant an easement to Collier County with respect to the surface water management system so that the County could operate and maintain the system in the event the Foundation fails to do so. 7 .11 ENVIRONMENT AL The Environmental Advisory Council stipulations: A. A site clearing plan shall be submitted to the Natural Resources Department and the Community Development Division for their review and approval prior to any substantial work on the site. This plan may be submitted in phases to coincide with the development schedule. The site clearing plan shall clearly depict how the final site layout incorporates retained native vegetation to the maximum extent possible and how roads, buildings, lakes, parking lots, and other facilities have been oriented to accommodate this goal. B. Native species shall be utilized, where available, to the maximum extent possible in the site landscaping design. A landscaping plan will be submitted to the Natural Resources Department and the Community Development Division for their review and approval. This plan will depict the incorporation of native species and their mix with other species, if any. The goal of site landscaping shall be the re-creation of native vegetation and habitat characteristics lost on the site during construction or due to past activities. C. All exotic plants, as defined in the County Code, shall be removed during each phase of construction from development areas, open space areas, and preserve areas. Following site development a maintenance program shall be implemented to prevent reinvasion of the site by such exotic species. This plan, which will describe control techniques and inspection intervals, shall be filed with and approved by the Natural Resources Department and the Community Development Division. D. If during the course of site clearing, excavation, or other constructional activities, an archaeological or historical site, artifact, or other indicator is discovered, all development at that location shall be immediately stopped and the Natural Resources Department PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 16 3.E.f Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) notified. Development will be suspended for sufficient length of time to enable the Natural Resources Department or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course. of action in regard to its salvageability. The Natural Resources Department will respond to any such notification in a timely and efficient manner so as to provide only a minimal interruption to any constructional activities. E. The cypress wetland and buffer zone is to be checked and approved by the Natural Resources Personnel prior to any construction in the vicinity of the wetlands. F. As many existing native trees and shrubs as possible shall be incorporated into the development. G. The developers shall demonstrate to the Natural Resources Department that this development will be in compliance with the water quality regulations as outlined by DEP and SFWMD when they retum with their site development plans and, more specifically, if DEP or SFWMD requires water quality monitoring of their storrnwater run-off, then Natural Resources Department requests that they receive copies of all the data. 7 .12 FIRE The North Naples Fire Control District has stated their ability to serve the Pine Air Lakes Project, with the following stipulations: A. Water mains and the locations of the fire hydrants must be approved by them prior to issuance of any building permits. B. Pine Air Lakes shall commit to pay its fair share for improvements needed as a result of the development if and when an impact fee policy is adopted by the North Naples Fire District to cover the entire District. 7.13 EXEMPTIONS TO THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Pine Air Lakes development shall be exempt from the following Land Development Code requirements: A. Section 06.06.01.Q.l, LDC: Street name signs shall be approved by the Development Services Director, but need not meet the U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. Manual ofUniform Traffic Control Devices. B. Section 05.06.00, LDC: Entry signage may be located within the right-of-way of the dedicated roadway. Such signage and planting shall be approved by the Development Services Director. C. The requirement to place permanent reference monument and permanent control points in a typical water valve where such monuments occur within street pavement areas shall be waived. 7.14 TRANSPORTATION A. Except for the three permitted connections to Airport Road, all access to individual parcels shall be intemal from Naples Boulevard or from loop roads connecting adjacent properties in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 17 3.E.f Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) roads and minimize the need for traffic signals as described in Policy 7 .2 of the Future Land Use Element. B. The developer shall provide crosswalks at the intersection of Naples Boulevard and the future Interconnection Road/Regal Cinema Property and at the future intersection west of the Regal Cinema property at the existing Naples Boulevard Curb cut located approximately ¼ mile to the north of the southem property line of the CPUD along Naples Boulevard. The crosswalk for the future Interconnection Road/Regal Cinema intersection with Naples Boulevardshall be installed simultaneously with the permanent traffic signal. All crosswalk requirements shall be completed prior to the build-out of the CPUD. C. Naples Boulevard is constructed and dedicated to Collier County and the water system is looped in accordance with the Utilities Division regulations and requirements. D. All Collier County traffic impact fees for Pine Air Lakes CPUD shall be as provided by the current impact fee ordinance. E. In conjunction with the six-laning of Airport Road, the following improvements shall be made at the intersection of Naples Boulevard with Airport Road: 1. The developer has constructed or contributed its fair share payment for the construction of one additional northbound left turn lane from Naples Boulevard to Airport Pulling Road for a total of two left turn lanes. 2. The developer has constructed or contributed its fair share payment for the construction of the traffic signal at the intersection of Airport Road and Naples Boulevard. 3. In addition to the forgoing, at the County's request, the developer shall construct a third northbound left turn lane from Naples Boulevard to Airport Pulling Road within one year of the approval of this CPUD amendment and DRI development order amendment. 4. The developer shall extend the stacking lanes for the north to westbound left turn lane onto Naples Boulevard from Airport Road within one year of the approval of this CPUD amendment and DRI development order amendment. F. All proposed median opening locations shall be in accordance with the Collier County Access Management Policy (Resolution No. 01-247), as it may be amended, and the Land Development Code, as it may be amended. Collier County reserves the right, pursuant to Collier County ordinances to modify or close any median opening existing at the time of approval of this CPUD which is found to be adverse to the health, safety and welfare of the public. Any such modifications shall be based on, but are not limited to, safety, operational circulation, and roadway capacity. G. A five (5) foot sidewalk easement and completed sidewalk have been provided by the developer within the twenty (20) foot buffer along the Airport Road frontage. An additional one (1) foot sidewalk easement shall be provided by the developer within the twenty (20) foot buffer along the Airport Road frontage, north of Naples Boulevard, at Collier County's request and within one year of the approval ofthis C PUD amendment and DRI development order amendment. PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 18 3.E.f Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) H. All work within Collier County rights-of-way or public easements shall reqmre a right-of-way permit. I. Any reduction in parking spaces as a result of interconnection with projects to the north and west shall be consistent with Subsection 4.04.02.B.3. of the Land Development Code quoted below: During the development or redevelopment of commercial or residential projects and all rezone petitions shared access and interconnection shall be required. Should the shared access or interconnection require the removal of existing parking spaces, the applicable development will not be required to mitigate for the parking spaces. The County Manger or designee shall require the shared access and interconnection unless in the professional judgment of the County Manger, or designee, one of the following criteria prohibits this requirement. a. lt is not physically or legally possible to provide the shared access or interconnection. b. The cost associated with the shared access or interconnection is unreasonable. For this application unreasonable will be considered when the cost exceeds the cost of a typical local road section or is above 10% of the value of the improvements being made to the development. c. The location of environmentally sensitive lands precludes it and mitigation is not possible. d. The abutting use is found tobe incompatible with the existing or proposed use. J. All traffic control devices, signs, pavement markings and design criteria shall be in accordance with Florida Department Transportation (FDOT) Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards (MUMS), current edition, FDOT Design Standards, current Edition, and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), current Edition. All other improvements shall be consistent with and as required by the Collier County Land Development Code. K. Site-related improvements necessary for safe ingress and egress to this project, as determined by Collier County, shall not be eligible for impact fee credits. All required improvements shall be in place and available to the public prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy (CO), or when requested by Collier County. L. Nothing depicted on any the CPUD Master Plan except for those access points in existence as of the date hereof shall vest any right of access at any specific point along any property frontage or property line. All such access shall be consistent with the Collier County Access Management Policy (Res. No. 01-247), as it may be amended from time to time, and with the Collier County Lang-Range Transportation Plan. The number of access points may be less than the number depicted on the Master Plan; however, no additional extemal access points shall be considered unless a PUD amendment or PUD insubstantial change is approved. M. All intemal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks and interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 19 3.E.f Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) developer and Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. N. lf any turn lane improvement requires the use of any existing County right-of-way or easement and there is insufficient right-of-way available, the developer shall accommodate those turn lanes within the development. 0. lf, in the sole opinion of Collier County, a traffic signal, or other traffic control device, sign or pavement marking improvement within a public right-of-way or easement within the boundary of this CPUD is determined to be warranted, the cost of such improvement shall be bome by the Developer and shall be paid to Collier County. P. At the request of Collier County, two Collier Area Transit (CAT) bus stops with shelters shall be installed by the developer or, at the discretion of Collier County, a designated park-and-ride location shall be provided in lieu of the shelters. The exact location will be determined during site development plan review process. This commitment shall be fulfilled within one year of the approval of this CPUD amendment and DRI development order amendment. Q. The developer shall contribute an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 to Collier County's SCOOT program along Pine Ridge Road to include two additional intersections. This contribution to Collier County shall be made within one year of the approval of this CPUD amendment and DRI development order amendment. R. In lieu of the annual traffic counts for the PUD monitoring requirements, the developer shall make a payrnent to Collier County to install four permanent count stations not to exceed a total of $40,000.00 purusant to the Land Development Code. Payment to Collier County shall be made within one year of the approval of this CPUD amendment and DRI development order amendment. S. The developer shall construct or cause to be constructed an interconnection road to the industrial park to the north of the CPUD as shown on Exhibit "C". The developer shall be responsible to coordinate the construction with the owner of the property currently developed as Naples Dodge. The construction of the interconnection road shall be completed at the earlier to occur of (i) prior to the issuance of a CO for any improvements constructed upon the eastem 9.86 acre portion of Pine Air Lakes Unit 3, Lot 1 (tax parcel 66760010044); or (ii) within one year of the approval of this CPUD amendment and DRI development order amendment. T. The developer shall extend the eastbound stacking lane on Pine Ridge Road for the north- bound turn onto Naples Boulevard within one year of the approval of this CPUD amendment and DRI development order amendment. U. The developer shall utilize the existing Naples Boulevard median (County right-of-way) to construct a second right turn lane from southbound Naples Boulevard onto westbound Pine Ridge Road within one year of the approval of this CPUD amendment and DRI development order amendment. V. The developer shall modify the Naples Boulevard median cuts used for controlling traffic entering and exiting the Horne Depot and NCH sites from Naples Boulevard in PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 20 3.E.f Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) accordance with the design criteria approved by the Collier County Transportation Department within one year of the approval of the CPUD amendment and DRI development order amendment and after the design criteria have been approved by the Collier County Transportation Department. W. When traffic counts warrant and when requested by the Collier County Transportation Department, the developer shall construct a mast arm traffic signal at the future intersection that will be located at the existing curb cut on Naples Boulevard approximately ¼ mile from the southern boundary of the CPUD (west of the Regal Cinema). X. 1. Within sixty (60) days after the approval of this CPUD amendment and DRI development order amendment, the developer shall install a temporary traffic signal on Naples Boulevard at the intersection of Naples Boulevard and the entry to the Regal Cinema property. The Collier County Transportation Department shall provide the lights and controls and the developer shall pay the costs of purchasing and installing the temporary poles and installing the temporary traffic signal. 2. The developer shall design and construct a mast arm traffic signal (permanent traffic signal) to replace the temporary signal concurrent with the construction of the interconnection road referenced in Subsection 7.14.S of this Document, but in any event the construction of the permanent traffic signal shall be completed within one year of the approval of this CPUD amendment and DRI development order amendment. 7 .15 W ATER MANAGEMENT A. Conceptual and/or detailed site drainage plans shall be submitted to the Environmental Advisory Board for review. B. The Developer has provided to Collier County a thirty-five (35) foot wide and a twenty-five (25) foot wide perpetual, non-exclusive easement for drainage purposes along the western boundary of the Pine Air Lakes project a thirty (30) foot wide temporary non-exclusive construction easement which parallels a twenty-five (25) foot wide temporary non-exclusive drainage easement, both of which temporary easements connect with the temporary drainage easement for the lake abutting the property's northeastern boundary along Airport-Pulling Road, around which lake the thirty (30) foot temporary construction easement continues; all as more fully described in the drainage conveyance documents dated April 1994, and the drawings attached thereto and prepared by Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc ., dated February 1994 for File No. 2G-403. Said temporary easements are for the purpose of accepting and transmitting 29 acres of Pine Ridge Industrial Park (Northeast Quadrant) drainage through the water management system, and shall be abandoned at time of site development plan approval of the area north of Naples Boulevard. At time of site development plan approval, a twenty-five (25) foot wide perpetual, non-exclusive easement for drainage purposes shall be dedicated to Collier County and recorded in the public records. C. An excavation permit will be required for the proposed lakes in accordance with appropriate County ordinances. PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 21 3.E.f Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) UTILITY SERVICE SECTION VIII 8.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to provide a list of utility services and how they will be provided. A. See the Utilities Division stipulations per their memos dated July 23, 1985; and September 21, 1985. 8.02 W ATER SUPPL Y The Collier County Water and Sewer District shall provide water to the Pine Air Lakes Development from the existing 16" water main located within the Airport Road right-of-way. 8.03 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION Solid waste collection for the Pine Air Lakes Project will be handled by the company holding the franchise for that area of the County. 8.04 ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE Florida Power and Light Company will provide electricity to the entire Pine Air Lakes Project. 8.05 TELEPHONE SERVICE Telephone service will be supplied by appropriate provider to the Pine Air Lakes Project. 8.06 TELEVISION CABLE SERVICE The Pine Air Lakes Project will be provided cable service by the cable company holding the franchise for that area ofthe County. 8.07 EASEMENTS FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES All on-site utilities such as telephone, electric power, cable television service, waste water collection, water distribution, etc. shall be installed underground. Only items such as electrical feeder lines, lift stations, etc. which require above ground installation shall be permitted above ground. 8.08 WATER DISTRIBUTION AND SEWERAGE MAIN DEDICATION Tue water distribution and sewerage mains shall be located in the road right-of-way and will be dedicated to the public. The water distribution and sewerage mains will be deeded to Collier County Water and Sewer District upon completion in accordance to applicable county ordinances in effect at the time of the Pine Air Lakes PUD Submission. The applicant or future owners, will pay appropriate development hook-up fees at the time of application for building permits. Should any water/sewer system elements be located outside the road right-of-way, the appropriate easements will be dedicated. 8.09 PROJECT EASEMENTS AND SERVICES All easements and services mentioned in this and previous sections of this Document shall be non-exclusive PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 22 3.E.f Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT SECTION IX The Developer, its successors in interest, and all future assigns or designees shall adhere to all commitments made in the Development ofRegional Impact (DRI) Application for Development Approvals (ADA), sufficiency responses, and attachments for this amendment and all previously adopted DRI Development Order (DO) actions for this project. PUD document w BCC changes (2) 3-20-07.doc 23 3.E.f Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) E .g <Ö i ö "' .... " ::IE E .!. 0:- (.) ::IE ,; u, e "' .g " ~ ffi 'i ~ ~ ~ 8 l 8 N t C ::> j i ~ ;::. ;::; 8 C ~ -~ 1 ·e ~ ~ ~ ~ :.< i :t ~ ::, c:, ;1 IE ... z iL POSSI BLC FUTURC CO:-<NECTION MIXED-USE RETAIUOFFLCE . , ' . -· PROP.'.IS[I). LA:~E . ..•. P_ltOl'OSUO ALJ-tf.K:C lXISTING .. LAKC#J JOI-INSQJN ENGINEERING FUTURC CONNCCTION NAPLES DODGE ~ -~-~~ nr i i ==='17 1 MlXED-USE RETAIUOFFICE ~-- MIXED-USE D RET AlUOFFICE 1--~-----it MLXED-USE RETALUOFFICE , .. ~,_~,,,,,,.- i a----41 /,,, · , , PRESERVE AREA r:::-.::1 . '-·····' Land Use Summary Mixed-Use Office/Retail ROW Lake/Open Space Preserve Area 11ncludm@ ~uffen.) Total 103.00 Acres l0.69 Ai.:res 33.49 Acres l.8 l Acres 148.99 Acres BOB TAYlOR CHEVROLET 0 200 L:XISTING LAK~ #2 400 SCALE IN FEET HOME DEPOT 2158 JOHNSON SlREET P.O. BOX 1550 FORT MYERS, FLORIDA J3902-1S50 PHONE (239) 334-0046 FAX (2.39) 334-.3661 E.B. 1642 &: LB. 111642 OAlE March 2007 Master Concept P lan PROJECT NO. FILE NO. SCALE 20055243 Al Shown 3.E.f Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) LEGAL DESCRI PTION 1.. p.&rcel or uac.t.of •hnd ly1n9 in St~tton 11. TO'a'IIJMp .f.9 So!fth. Ringe_ tS Cast, Collfer County, no.-1,u, bttn9 • ducr1b-ed u follo-a: . • co-ncln9 1t th• l«lrthciu· corner of uld ·scctlon 11, n,n ~ OQOt1'47• W 11~n9 th4 [1st \1nc of s,td S•ctlon ll • dhUnce of 1318.H (ect; thcnu S cs0 0•13• W 100 .M ftcl to the PO[HT Of BCGtMlkG 1nd thc ....,,ttrly r19ht-ot-v1y llnc of County Ro1d 11<>.31; thcnc, cont1nuc S geo~J'll" V 2~5•,06 fe,t; thcnce S 01°os•z7• [ 1Jl~.7l (cet; thtncc 5 otoos•ts• E UHi,711 <cet; thtncc lC 8l!OSl'll" t ll4L.C2 fect.; thcnce K 00ol6'S8" w J29.4S fcet: thcncc K sso5o•s7• E •t•S.&t rc,t to thc Wcst~rly rl9ht•of-w4y llrui o( Cout1ty Ro1d Ko.)1; · thCflCt K OQ 21·1a· C &long uld r-19~t-of-v11 lfoc 98S.28 fcct: thence K 00°21••0• E 1lon9 s11d rtght•of-v&y llne 1J18,60 (ccl to the POIKT OF 8(Gll<t<lttG: S.t1d par~d or tract tonulnlng-148,99 .ac:rct, IIQl"t or lcu. SubJcct to cuanicnti, rutdct.lons tnd ruerv.it1ou of record. Borlngs bUed on t beartn9 o( IC oo0 z7•41• E Oft Ule Eut Hnt of tM Nt't of Stction U, Township ~9 S1111U1. hngc: 2S Cut. Collier County, F1orf111. • Thls des<;dpt1ort MCU lM Ktnl•UII Technie&l Standards. u . set fortJ\ by the florfdt lo1f"d of Land Surveyon, p11rs11.aftt tQ Ch•ptcr 472.0l.7 • f1or1d& SU tvtu. · Pine Air Lakes PUDZ-A-2005-AR-8550 Exhibit B 3.E.f Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) EXHIBIT "C" Pine Air Lakes / Naples Dodge lnterconnect Exhibit Naples Dodge ~ 1 ' Hollywood 20 THlS EXHIBIT IS CONCEPTUAL. THE FINAL DESIGN SHALL BE APPROVED BY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DUR!NG SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW. ANY REVISIONS TO THIS EXHIBIT SHALL NOT REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT. 3.E.f Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2007-32 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 13th day of March, 2007, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 22nd day of March, 2007. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Cl'erk Ex-officio to Board of County Commissioners __ ., / ~-. By: Ann Jennej ohn,,, Deputy Clerk • '-· ,"\ i.,.., 3.E.f Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions Chick-fil-A Naples Center PDI- PL20190000194 ************* 3.05 BUFFERS A. All parcels within the Pine Air Lakes development adjacent to interior roads shall provide a minimum fifteen (15) foot wide landscape strip buffer. (Excluding parcels designated Lakes/Open Space.) B. A minimum buffer fifteen (15) feet wide will be provided along all parcels (except Lake/Open Space parcels) which are adjacent to surrounding land presently zoned industrial/commercial. A minimum twenty (20) foot buffer will be provided along Airport Road. C. All other buffers shall meet the minimum standards of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of development of the parcel. D. No parking, outside display signs, or other structures shall be located within buffers. E. This section is subject to Section 10, Deviations, of the Pine Air Lakes PUD Ordinance 07-32. *********** 3.E.f Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions Chick-fil-A Naples Center PDI- PL20190000194 ************ DEVIATIONS SECTION X 1. A deviation from Section 4.06.02, Table 2.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code, which allows abutting commercial zoned properties to share a 15’ landscape buffer, with each abutting property contributing 7.5’, to instead allow a reduction of the 7.5’ portion of the landscape buffer on the northern side of the Chick-Fil-A parcel to a varying width of 4” to 7.5’. The encroached buffer area and removed trees from the reduced buffer area shall be re-allocated elsewhere on the Chick-Fil-A parcel, and nine (9) supplemental understory trees shall be provided per the “Deviation #1 Landscape Exhibit” in the north buffer. This Deviation applies only to the Chick-Fil-A parcel within this PUD. 3.E.f Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: Attachment E Backup Material Chick Fil A (13889 : PL20190000194 PDI Chick-Fil-A) 11/12/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 4.A Item Summary: Proposed 2021 Hearing Examiner Meeting Schedule Meeting Date: 11/12/2020 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Senior – Zoning Name: Jeremy Frantz 10/29/2020 5:22 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 10/29/2020 5:22 PM Approved By: Review: Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 10/29/2020 5:29 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Rose Burke Review Item Completed 10/29/2020 5:49 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 10/30/2020 11:01 AM Zoning Anita Jenkins Review Item Completed 11/02/2020 10:07 AM Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 11/12/2020 9:00 AM 4.A Packet Pg. 814 Memorandum To: Andrew Dickman, Hearing Examiner From: Jeremy Frantz, LDC Manager Date: October 29, 2020 Re: 2021 Hearing Examiner Meeting Calendar Hearing Examiner Meetings are typically held on the second and fourth Thursday’s of each month. This schedule is shown below. In 2021, both November meetings occur on Federal holidays when Collier County offices are closed (Veteran’s Day and Thanksgiving). Additionally, the second Thursday in December occurs on December 23, 2021. Since these dates may not be conducive to facilitating public participation, staff recommends holding only one meeting in November (on a Friday) and December. 2021 HEX Meeting Dates • January 14, 2021 • January 28, 2021 • February 11, 2021 • February 25, 2021 • March 11, 2021 • March 25, 2021 • April 8, 2021 • April 22, 2021 • May 13, 2021 • May 27, 2021 • June 10, 2021 • June 24, 2021 • July 8, 2021 • July 22, 2021 • August 12, 2021 • August 26, 2021 • September 9, 2021 • September 23, 2021 • October 14, 2021 • October 28, 2021 • FRIDAY, November 12, 2021 • December 9, 2021 4.A.a Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: 2021 Meeting Schedule Memorandum (13808 : Proposed 2021 Hearing Examiner Meeting Schedule)