The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 11/10/2020 Item #17D (Ordinance - Meridian Village - Mixed-Use PUD)17.D 11/10/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 10-28, as amended, the Meridian Village Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development, to redesignate property from Tract A, community facility, to Tract C, commercial; to allow construction of 50,000 square feet of luxury auto dealership uses in addition to the previously approved community facility uses including youth centers, churches, group care, family care, adult day care, and senior housing on Tract C. The property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Airport -Pulling Road and Estey Avenue in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 11.68f acres; and by providing an effective date. [PL201900024941 (This is a companion to Agenda Item 17.C) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staffs findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above -referenced petition and render a decision regarding the petition, and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property consists of 11.68+/- acres and is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Airport -Pulling Road and Estey Avenue in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County. This petitioner seeks to amend the Meridian Village MPUD, approved via Ordinance #10-28, to redesignate property from Tract A, Community Facility, to Tract C, Commercial; to allow construction of 50,000 square feet of luxury auto dealership uses plus community facility uses including youth centers, churches, group care, family care, adult day care, and senior housing on Tract C. FISCAL IMPACT: The PUD Amendment (PUDA) by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build -out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the PUD Amendment is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by Staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. FLUE CONCLUSION: Based on the above analysis, staff finds the subject petition NOT consistent with the FLUE; however, the petition may be deemed consistent IF the companion GMP amendment is adopted and becomes effective. The PUDA Ordinance needs to contain an effective date linked to the effective date of the companion GMPA. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's April 30, 2020, Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the applicable 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Packet Pg. 2242 17.D 11/10/2020 Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition the proposed development will generate a projected total of +/- 255 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway segments of Airport -Pulling Based on the TIS and the 2019 AUIR, the subject PUD Amendment can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan, the Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The native vegetation required to be retained for the PUD was approved in accordance with Ordinance 10-28. No revisions to the environmental portions of the PUD petition are being requested. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC): The CCPC, heard Petition PUDA- PL20190002494, Meridian Village MPUD on October 1, 2020, and voted 7-0 to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval with changes to the PUD document. No letters of objection have been received; however, a public speaker at the CCPC meeting, representing neighbors, objected to the PUD changes. Concerns were with parking spaces, noise and traffic disruptions, and blocking traffic lanes along Airport Rd. to unload cars off car carriers. The CCPC recommended the following changes to the PUD document, Exhibit F - Development Commitments: • Under the section, Proximity of Property to Naples Airport, Part 2, second sentence. The word Purchaser's to become plural and read Purchasers • Under the Section Operational Standards for Auto Dealership Use, Part 1. Adding the language "and/or southern side of the dealership facing Estey Avenue" to the end of the sentence. The changes were accepted by staff, and these revisions were added to the Ordinance. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is an amendment to the existing Meridian Village Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (Ordinance No. 10-28, as amended). The burden falls upon the applicant for the amendment to prove that the proposal is consistent with all of the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denial, that such denial is not arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the amendment does not meet one or more of the listed criteria. Criteria for PUD Amendments Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. Packet Pg. 2243 17.D 11/10/2020 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed PUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested PUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? Packet Pg. 2244 11/10/2020 17.D 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the PUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the Board hearing as these items relate to these criteria. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: If the Board approves the companion GMP amendment, then staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC, which is reflected in the attached Ordinance and recommends that the Board approve the applicant's request to amend the MPUD. Prepared by: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Staff Report - Meridian Village PUDA (PDF) 2. Attachment A - Revised Proposed Ordinance 10-5-20 (PDF) 3. Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Memo (PDF) 4. [Linked] Attachment C - Application -Backup Materials (PDF) 5. Attachment D - Property Hearing Signs (PDF) 6. Attachment E - Hybrid Hearing Waiver (PDF) 7. legal ad - agenda ID 13086 & 13368 (PDF) Packet Pg. 2245 17.D 11/10/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.1) Doe ID: 13086 Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 10-28, as amended, the Meridian Village Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development, to redesignate property from Tract A, community facility, to Tract C, commercial; to allow construction of 50,000 square feet of luxury auto dealership uses in addition to the previously approved community facility uses including youth centers, churches, group care, family care, adult day care, and senior housing on Tract C. The property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Airport -Pulling Road and Estey Avenue in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 11.68± acres; and by providing an effective date. [PL20190002494] (This is a companion to Agenda Item ITC) Meeting Date: 11/10/2020 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Tim Finn 10/06/2020 8:50 AM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning — Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 10/06/2020 8:50 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Zoning Zoning Growth Management Department Growth Management Department County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget Office of Management and Budget County Attorney's Office County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Judy Puig Level 1 Reviewer Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Anita Jenkins Additional Reviewer Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review James C French Deputy Department Head Review Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending Completed 10/08/2020 2:25 PM Completed 10/08/2020 5:49 PM Completed 10/11/2020 6:36 PM Completed 10/12/2020 1:24 PM Completed 10/12/2020 4:43 PM Completed 10/29/2020 2:06 PM Completed 10/29/2020 3:05 PM Completed 10/29/2020 3:28 PM Completed 10/30/2020 10:42 AM Completed 11/01/2020 7:41 AM 11/10/2020 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 2246 17.D.1 Coffier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 1, 2020 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20190002494 MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD COMPANION ITEM: PL20190002496/CPSS-2020-01 PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owner/Applicant: Porcha Land Holdings, LLC 1250 Airport Road S Naples, FL 34104 Agents: D. Wayne Arnold Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Agent: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to amend Ordinance Number 10-28, as amended, the Meridian Village Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consists of 11.68+/- acres and is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Airport -Pulling Road and Estey Avenue in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County (see location map, page 2). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petitioner seeks to amend the Meridian Village MPUD, approved via Ordinance #10-28, to redesignate property from Tract A, Community Facility, to Tract C, Commercial; to allow construction of 50,000 square feet of luxury auto dealership uses plus community facility uses including youth centers, churches, group care, family care, adult day care, and senior housing on Tract C. PUDA-PL20190002494; Meridian Village MPUD Page 1 of 13 Revised: September21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2247 ((`dand) andW a6eIHA ueipiaaw : 980£0 `land 86ellin ueipiaow-:podell jje)S :;uawy3ejjV - d - . A . IL n `l IP - J 6u IIInd vod+y _ F 2 W JDs Z) 1 o LL (A q R L& 5 O k pw dd� IL Z BLvD " ®, 1 0 l'� }ttimhedY $LV4 00 � o � � 0 - � IR X FUN ■r i • ' PUDA-PL20190002494; Meridian Village MPUD Revised: September 21, 2020 CL V N V CD 0 CD M T l V J n �L: W z C 0 Page 2 of 13 17.D.1 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding boundaries of the proposed 3.29-acre Tract C of the Meridian Village MPUD: North: Developed with an assisted living facility, with a current zoning designation of Meridian Village MPUD and is approved for community facilities and residential South: Estey Ave, a local road, then developed with an automotive dealership (Stearns Motors), with a current zoning designation of Heavy Commercial (C-5) zoning district East: Airport -Pulling Rd S, a six -lane arterial roadway, and then developed with gas stations with convenience stores (Shell and 7-Eleven) and St. Matthew's Thrift Store with a current zoning designation of General Commercial (C-4) zoning district West: Developed single and multi -family residential, with a current zoning designation of Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6) zoning district Aerial Photo (Q. Grady Minor) PUDA-PL20190002494; Meridian Village MPUD Page 3 of 13 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2249 17.D.1 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed amendment. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any amendment petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The applicant requests to create a new Tract C from the southerly 3.29 acres of Tract A and add a maximum of 50,000 square feet of gross leasable area for a new or used luxury automobile dealership use to the uses previously approved for Meridian Village via Ordinance #2010-28, as amended. In order for the use to be consistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP), the applicant has also submitted a companion small-scale GMP Amendment (GMPA) to create Meridian Village Mixed Use Subdistrict, which will allow the requested use. The ±3.29-acre site is designated Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict and is within the Coastal High Hazard Area as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. This subject site comprises the southerly portion of Tract A in the ±11.68-acre Meridian Village MPUD. The Urban Mixed -Use District is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including mixed -use developments such as Planned Unit Developments. According to the FLUE in the Urban Designation Section, Urban designated areas will accommodate non-residential uses including commercial uses subject to criteria identified in the Urban Mixed -Use District and as listed in the FLUE. New and used luxury auto sales use (SIC 5511 and 5599) are not listed in the Urban Designation non-residential uses, nor does the Meridian Village Community Facility PUD permit commercial uses. However, a mixed -use subdistrict may be created that will allow the proposed amended PUD to be consistent with the FLUE in Section #12 under Urban Designation. The Meridian Village MPUD zoning currently permits only the following principal uses: Community Facility uses — 480 beds, Senior Residential uses — 120 DU, and Preserves; it does not currently allow commercial uses., a use permitted which would accommodate automobile dealership use. The applicant is requesting to amend the MPUD to permit a luxury automobile dealership use, a use permitted in the General Commercial District (C-4) and Heavy Commercial District (C-5). The petition is only amending the southerly ±3.29-acre portion of PUD Tract A to create a Tract C. Based on the above analysis, staff finds the petition may be deemed consistent IF the companion GMP amendment is adopted and becomes effective. The PUDA Ordinance needs to contain an effective date linked to the effective date of the companion GMPA. (See Attachment B — FLUE Consistency Review) Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's April 30, 2020 Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the applicable 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). PUDA-PL20190002494; Meridian Village MPUD Page 4 of 13 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2250 17.D.1 Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition the proposed development will generate a projected total of +/- 255 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway segments of Airport -Pulling Road and Davis Boulevard (SR 84). This represents an additional +/- 112 PM peak hour, 2-way trips, requested with this petition, to the existing developments approved +/-143 PM peak hour 2-way trips. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway link: Link/Roadway Link 2019 AUIR Current Peak 2019 LOS Hour Peak Remaining Direction Capacity Volume/Peak Direction 5.0/Airport Pulling Radio Road to C 2,800/North 779 Road Davis Boulevard 13.0/Davis Boulevard Airport Pulling C 2,000/East 670 (SR 84) Road to Lakewood Boulevard PUDA-PL20190002494; Meridian Village MPUD Page 5 of 13 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2251 17.D.1 Based on the TIS and the 2019 AUIR, the subject PUD Amendment can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan, the Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The native vegetation required to be retained for the PUD was approved in accordance with Ordinance 10-28. No revisions to the environmental portions of the PUD petition are being requested. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.17, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." Drainage: The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create area drainage problems. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage will be addressed through the environmental resource permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will also evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of site development plan (SDP) and/or platting (PPL). Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the PUD petition to address environmental concerns. The existing preserve area will not be impacted by the proposed petition. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Landscape Review: There are no deviations for landscape requirements associated with this PUDA and the buffers shown on the Master Plan are consistent with the LDC. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Utilities Review: The project lies within the City of Naples potable water service area and south wastewater service area of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD). Tract A already receives potable water and wastewater services from the City of Naples and the CCWSD respectively, and existing utility infrastructure is readily available for the development of Tract C. This petition proposes no increase in density or changes in permitted uses and would therefore have no impact on public utility facilities adequacy. PUDA-PL20190002494; Meridian Village MPUD Page 6 of 13 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2252 17.D.1 Zoning Services Review: The 11.68± project is designated Urban Residential, Urban Mixed Use Residential on the Future Land Use Map. A small-scale amendment application has been filed for a 3.29-acre portion of the MPUD via PL20190002496/CPSS-2020-01. The proposed Meridian Village Mixed Use Subdistrict will permit a new or used luxury automobile dealership, as well as residential and community facility uses presently permitted in the MPUD and consistent with the Future Land Use Element. The portion of the property proposed to permit commercial land uses was previously zoned C-4, General Commercial and deemed consistent by policy under the County's zoning re-evaluation program. In 2006, the property owner rezoned the property to the Meridian Village MPUD and did not include commercial uses in the approved MPUD. Current policies in the Future Land Use Element do not provide a mechanism to re-establish the previously approved commercial land uses; therefore, the small-scale amendment is required to permit the limited commercial use. Policies 5.3 and 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element require that rezoning's must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Upon approval of the companion small-scale growth management plan amendment, which will establish the Meridian Village Mixed Use District, the proposed MPUD amendment may be deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Commercial development will include appropriate buffers and other development standards to ensure that the uses developed on the 3.29-acre commercial tract will be compatible with the residential uses located immediately west of the MPUD. A landscape buffer currently exists and was installed concurrent with development of the assisted living facility, which has been developed on the northern portion of the site. In regard to development standards, the proposed commercial standards (Tract C) for Meridian Village MPUD is similar with the existing development standards for the residential and community facilities within the Meridian Village MPUD with setbacks, maximum heights, preserve setbacks, the minimum distance required between structures, and required landscape buffering. (See table below for Development Standards comparison) It should be noted that the front yard setbacks proposed for Tract C are the same as the surrounding C-4, C-5, and RMF-6 zoning districts; however, the side and rear yard setbacks proposed for Tract C are more than these aforementioned zoning districts. Regarding height, the proposed Tract C has a height that is less than the C-4 district but is higher than the C-5 and RMF-6 districts. The minimum floor area proposed for Tract C is more that what is existing for the residential and community facilities with the Meridian Village MPUD, C-4, C-5, and RMF-6 districts. As such, the proposed development standards for Tract C within the Meridian Village MPUD would be compatible with the development standards already established for the residential and community facilities in the MPUD, and the C-4, C-5, and RMF-6 zoning districts. Furthermore, as stated in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section, there is an existing automotive vehicle dealership (Stearns Motors) directly to the south of the subject property. The applicant is proposing a luxury car dealership for Tract "C" and would not be out of context with the existing commercial uses of the area and therefore would be compatible with the community character of the immediate surrounding neighborhoods. PUDA-PL20190002494; Meridian Village MPUD Page 7 of 13 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2253 Development Standards Front yard setback Meridian Village MPUD Proposed Commercial — 25 ft from Airport Pulling Rd Community Facilities - 25 ft from Airport Pulling Rd Residential - 25 ft from Airport Pullin Rd C-4 25 ft or''/2 building height; structures over 50 ft must maintain 50 ft plus 1 ft over 50 ft C-5 25 ft RMF-6 25 ft Side yard setback Meridian Village MPUD Proposed Commercial — 50 ft from west & south boundary and east and west of Steeves Ave Community Facilities - 50 ft from west & south boundary and east and west of Steeves Ave Residential - 50 ft from west & south boundary and east and west of Steeves Ave C-4 15 ft or''/2 building height C-5 15 feet RMF-6 7.5 ft Rear yard setback Meridian Village MPUD Proposed Commercial — 25 ft from north boundary Community Facilities — 25 feet or''/z of the building height Residential — Principal —'/z of the building height; Accessory 10 ft C-4 15 feet or''/2 building height C-5 15 feet RMF-6 20 ft Minimum floor area Meridian Village MPUD Proposed Commercial — Maximum 50,000 s.f. Community Facilities — Minimum 1,000 s.f. Residential — Townhouse 1,200 s.f. & Multi -Family 1,000 s.f. C-4 N.A. C-5 N.A. RMF-6 N.A. Maximum height Meridian Village MPUD Proposed Commercial — Principal - Zoned 45 ft & Actual 57 ft; Accessory 25 ft Community Facilities — Principal — Zoned 45 & Actual 57 ft; Accessory 20 ft Residential — Principal 45 ft; Accessory 25 ft C-4 75 ft C-5 35 ft RMF-6 Principal 35 ft; Accessory 15 ft Minimum lot size Meridian Village MPUD Proposed Commercial — N.A. Community Facilities — Minimum 10,000 s.£ Residential — Townhouse — Minimum 3,000 s.£ & Multi -Family — N.A. C-4 10,000 s.f. C-5 10,000 s.f. RMF-6 6,500 s.f. Preserve Setback Meridian Village MPUD Proposed Commercial — Principal 25 ft; Accessory 10 ft Communtiy Facilities — Princiapl — 25 ft & Accessory 10 ft Residentail — 25 ft C-4 N.A. C-5 N.A. RMF-6 N.A. Minimum Distance btwn Structures Meridian Village MPUD Proposed Commercial — 20 ft Community Facilities —'/z sum of building heights Residential — Principal 25 ft & Accessory 10 ft C-4 '/z sum of building heights or 15 ft whichever isgreater) C-5 '/z sum of building heights or 15 ft whichever isgreater) RMF-6 15 ft or sum of building heights whichever is greater PUDA-PL20190002494; Meridian Village MPUD Page 8 of 13 Revised: September 21, 2020 1` Q Packet Pg. 2254 17.D.1 LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment and is of the opinion the uses and property development regulations are compatible with the development approved in the area provided the companion GMPA is adopted. Moreover, this PUD has already been partially developed with potable water and wastewater services from the City of Naples and the CCWSD respectively. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the 3.29-acre portion of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report on page 4 if the companion GMPA is approved. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Staff Analysis section of this staff report, the proposed changes to the PUD do not affect the landscaping standards of the original PUD. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. No deviation from the required usable open space is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or PPL. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. PUDA-PL20190002494; Meridian Village MPUD Page 9 of 13 Revised: September21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2255 17.D.1 The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. Moreover, pursuant to Sec. 134-57(a) of the Collier County Code of Ordinances, availability of potable water and wastewater services must be verified in writing by the City of Naples and the CCWSD respectively prior to submittal of construction documents. However, this petition proposes no increase in density or changes in permitted uses and would therefore have no impact on public utility facilities adequacy. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including Collier County Water -Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will continuously be addressed when development approvals are sought. Moreover, the area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including City water and County wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The petitioner is not requesting any new deviations to the LDC. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners... shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable": Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the (FLUM) and other elements of the GMP if the companion GMPA is approved. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. PUDA-PL20190002494; Meridian Village MPUD Page 10 of 13 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2256 17.D.1 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is currently zoned PUD and would remain as such. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. This petition does not propose any change to the boundaries of the PUD. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary; however, it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to include the proposed uses and development standards that are specific to the subject parcel. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed PUD Amendment is not anticipated to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUDA request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area, provided stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage on this project are addressed through the Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County staff will also evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of SDP and/or PPL. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated the changes proposed to this PUD Amendment would seriously reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. PUDA-PL20190002494; Meridian Village MPUD Page 11 of 13 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2257 17.D.1 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The addition of the automotive vehicle use is not anticipated to serve as a deterrent to the improvement of the adjacent property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed uses cannot be achieved without amending the PUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff s opinion that the proposed uses, associated development standards, and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses PUDA-PL20190002494; Meridian Village MPUD Page 12 of 13 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2258 17.D.1 under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. It is to be determined at the public hearings NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The NIM was scheduled for Wednesday, July 22, 2020, 5:30 pm at the Salvation Army Church Chapel located at 3170 Estey Ave, Naples, Fl 34104. No members of the public were present or participating remotely and therefore no recording or transcript has been available. A copy of the NIM advertising and the prepared PowerPoint presentation are included in Attachment C. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on September 21, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: A) Proposed Ordinance B) FLUE Consistency Review C) Application/Backup Material PUDA-PL20190002494; Meridian Village MPUD Page 13 of 13 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2259 17.D.2 ORDINANCE NO.20- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 10-28, AS AMENDED, THE MERIDIAN VILLAGE MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO REDESIGNATE PROPERTY FROM TRACT A, COMMUNITY FACILITY, TO TRACT C, COMMERCIAL; TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF LUXURY AUTO DEALERSHIP USES IN ADDITION TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED COMMUNITY FACILITY USES INCLUDING YOUTH CENTERS, CHURCHES, GROUP CARE, FAMILY CARE, ADULT DAY CARE, AND SENIOR HOUSING ON TRACT C. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD AND ESTEY AVENUE IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 11.68t ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20190002494] WHEREAS, on July 27, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance No. 10-28, which created the Meridian Village Planned Unit Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, the PUD was subsequently amended by the Board of County Commissioners by Ordinance No. 13-47; and WHEREAS, Porcha Land Holdings, LLC represented by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the PUD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO THE PUD DOCUMENT The PUD Document attached as Exhibits "A" through "G" to Ordinance No. 10-28, as amended, is hereby amended and replaced with the revised PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "G" and incorporated by reference herein. [20-CPS-01971/1569508/1 1108 Meridian PUDA Page 1 of 2 PL20190002494 10/2/20 Packet Pg. 2260 17.D.2 SECTION TWO: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. 2020-_ becomes effective. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK IN , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: V� Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B - Development Standards Exhibit C - Master Plan Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibit E - List of Requested Deviations Exhibit F - List of Developer Commitments [20-CPS-01971/1569508/11108 Meridian PUDA PL20190002494 10/2/20 day of 12020. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Page 2 of 2 BURT L. SAUNDERS, Chairman Packet Pg. 2261 17.D.2 EXHIBIT A PERMITTED USES: TRACT CT A The Meridian Village MPUD is planned for up to 50,000 square feet of gross leasable area for retail commercial uses limited to luxury automobile dealership, 120 residential units or limited community facility (CF) uses including but not limited to assisted living facilities (ALF), continuing care retirement communities (CCRC) and independent living units for age 55 plus and senior housing. TRACT A Communitv Facilitv (CF The maximum size for the ALF-apA-,CCRC and independent living facilities for age 55 plus and similar facilities shall not exceed a floor to area ratio (FAR) of .60 and 480 beds. For each 4 ALFS CCRC and independent living facilities beds constructed, one residential dwelling unit shall be subtracted from the maximum of 120 permitted residential units identified in the Residential section of this document. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following primary uses: A. Principal Uses Assisted Living Facilities (ALF) as defined in the LDC and pursuant to §429 F.S., Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRC) and Independent Living Units (ILU) for age 55 plus pursuant to § 410.502 F.S. and ch. 58A-5 F.A.C; § 651 F.S. All ALF and CCRC uses shall be permitted at a combined maximum F.A.R. of 0.60. Nursing and Personal Care Facilities (8051, 8052) shall be consistent with operational characteristics stated on page 3 of this document. The maximum number of beds proposed is 480. 2. Adult Day Care Centers, (8322) limited to 150 adults requiring care. 3. Family Care Facilities, Group Care Facilities (Category I), as defined in the LDC and Nursing Homes, (8051, 8052) subject to LDC Section 5.05.04, excluding drug and alcohol treatment and rehabilitation facilities. 4. Churches & Places of Worship, (8661) not to exceed 1,150 seats. 5. Youth Centers, (8322), limited to the southerly half of the PUD as shown on the attached Master Concept Plan. 6. Any other principal use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following accessory uses to be utilized for the foregoing principal uses: Words StFUck thFough are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002494 — Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 1 of 19 Packet Pg. 2262 17.D.2 B. Accessory Uses 1. Boat Ramps subject to Section 5.03.06 and the applicable review criteria set forth in Section 5.05.02, limited to provide access for small boats, kayaks and canoes only. No dockage shall be provided. 2. Customary accessory uses including, but not limited to, maintenance buildings, private garages, carports, clubhouse, indoor and outdoor recreational facilities and swimming pools with or without screened enclosures, unlighted playfields, playgrounds and similar facilities. 3. Lending Library (Group 8231), incidental to ALF and CCRC uses 4. Personal Services (7231, 7241), Dining, Private Restaurant/Lounge and all customary services incidental to ALF and CCRC uses 5. Guardhouses and Gatehouses C. Operational Characteristics for CALF units including CCRC and Independent Living Units for Persons Over Age 55: The developer, its successors or assigns, shall provide the following services and/or be subject to the following operational standards: 1. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older. 2. There shall be on -site dining for the residents. 3. Group transportation services shall be provided for residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents' individualized needs including but not limited to medical office visits. 4. There shall be an on -site manager/activities coordinator to assist residents with their individual needs. 5. A wellness center shall be provided on -site. Exercise and other fitness programs shall be provided for the residents. 6. Each unit shall be equipped to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency. 7. Each unit shall be designed so that a resident is able to age -in -place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted to lower the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted to add grab bars. Words struck Weugh are deleted, • words underlined are added. PL20190002494 —Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 2 of 19 Packet Pg. 2263 17.D.2 Residential (R) A residential development would be designed to accommodate a full range of residential multi family dwelling types, compatible recreational facilities, essential services and customary accessory uses. Should the site develop with residential units, no CF facilities will be constructed. A. Principal Uses The number of dwelling units proposed to be constructed is 120 units. The gross project density, therefore, will be a maximum of 10.27 units per acre. 1. Townhouse dwellings 2. Multi -family dwellings 3. Essential services 4. Water management facilities and related structures B. Temporary Uses 1. Model units 2. Project information and Sales centers 3. Construction administrative offices for the developer and authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses. 4. Sales and administrative offices for the developer, project management or managing development association, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses C. Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this District, including neighborhood community recreational facilities and property management and maintenance structures intended to serve the residents and guests of the proposed development. 2. Garages and carports. 3. Administration facilities intended to serve the residents and guests of the proposed development. 4. Swimming Pools, Tennis courts and other recreational facilities and buildings. 5. Guardhouses and Gatehouses Words struck fliFeug# are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002494 —Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 3 of 19 Packet Pg. 2264 17.D.2 D. Development Standards Unless set forth in this Document, or as noted in Exhibit B (Table II), the following development standards shall apply to principal structures: Setback from back of curb or edge of pavement of any road - twelve (12') feet except for guardhouses, gatehouses, signage, walls, access control structures and landscape features, which shall meet LDC requirements where applicable. 2. Sidewalks and bike paths may occur within County required buffers, however, the width of the required buffer shall be increased proportionately to the width of the paved surface of the sidewalk, bike path or cart path. Words stFuekthreugh are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002494 — Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 4 of 19 Packet Pg. 2265 17.D.2 PERMITTED U TRACT B Preservation (P) A. Permitted Uses 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and boat ramps (limited to provide access for small boats, kayaks and canoes only. No dockage shall be provided) subject to Section 5.03.06 and the applicable review criteria set forth in Section 5.05.02 (elevated and at grade as long as any clearing required to facilitate these does not impact the minimum required vegetation). 2. Native preserves and wildlife sanctuaries. 3. Water management structures. 4. Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is compatible in nature with the foregoing uses, and which the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) determines to be compatible in the Preserve Area. Where Preserve areas are shown on the Master Concept Plan and the LDC requires landscape buffers, the preserve vegetation may contribute in part or in whole to the landscape buffer when it is demonstrated that the preserve vegetation meets or exceeds the buffer requirements of the LDC. Landscape buffers must remain exotic free while demonstrating sufficiency to achieve minimum buffer standards. Words struck thret+g# are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002494 — Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 5 of 19 Packet Pg. 2266 17.D.2 TRACT C Commercial Commercial development limited to luxury automobile dealership of up to 50,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area may constructed on Tract C as shown on the attached Master Concept Plan and identified as Tract I of the Meridian Village Phase I Plat (PB54 PG 38 and 39). The following uses shall be permitted: A. Principal Uses 1 Any Community Facility use permitted in Tract A Community Facility uses are subject to Exhibit B Development Standards Table I of the PUD. 2 Luxury Automotive vehicle and equipment dealers (5511 and 5599). Luxury Automotive dealer shall be any automobile dealership (5511) that sells only new and used high -end luxury vehicles such as but not limited to Lamborghini Ferrari Masserati Lotus BMW, Alfa Romeo Karma or Jaguar and the hours of operation may be less than a typical automobile dealership and inventory maybe limited. 3 Any other permitted uses which are comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with purpose and intent statement of the district, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Accessory Uses and Structures 1 Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the principal uses permitted in this district. Words struckthFeugh are deleted, words underlined are added. PL20190002494 — Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 6 of 19 00 0 M T 0 N LO 0 a c c =a O a> W 0 0. 0 L a m m �1 Packet Pg. 2267 17.D.2 EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Table I below sets forth the development standards for Community Facilities within the proposed Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. TABLE I COMMUNITY FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CF MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 Square Feet MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 80 feet MINIMUM FLOOR AREA OF 1,000 square feet BUILDINGS MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO 0.601 PUD PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 25 Feet FROM AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK (FROM WEST BOUNDARY & SOUTH 50 Feet BOUNDARY EAST AND WEST OF STEEVES AVENUE ONLY MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS Front: Principal Structure 25 feet Accessory Structure 10 feet Side: Principal Structure 25 feet Accessory Structure 10 feet Rear: Principal Structure 25 feet or'/2 of the BH (whichever is greater) Accessory Structure 10 feet Internal Drives 15 feet from edge of drive aisle Minimum Distance '/2 of the SBH (but no less than 15 feet) Between Structures MAXIMUM HEIGHT Zoned: Principal Structure: 3-stories not to exceed 45 feet Accessory Structure: 20 feet Actual: Principal Structure: 57/75 Feet2 Accessory Structure: 27 feet PRESERVE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Principal Structures 25 feet Accessory Structures 10 feet 'ALF/CCRC/ILU and associated medical uses only excluding parking areas under buildings. 2Actual height for a permitted church steeple if developed shall be 75 feet. Words StFUckc thFough are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002494 — Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 7 of 19 Packet Pg. 2268 17.D.2 BH = Building Height (Zoned Height per the LDC) SBH = Sum of Building Heights Setback from a lake for all principal and accessory uses may be zero feet (0') provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into the design. Architectural bank treatments shall include any structural materials used to retain earth such as concrete stone or wood placed to LDC requirements. Words steal} are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002494 — Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 8 of 19 Packet Pg. 2269 17.D.2 Table II below sets forth the development standards for Multi Family Residential land uses within the proposed Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. TABLE II RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MULTI -FAMILY TOWNHOUSE DWELLINGS MINIMUM LOT AREA 3,000 Square Feet N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 30 Feet N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA OF 1,200 Square Feet 1,000 Square Feet BUILDINGS PUD PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 25 Feet 25 Feet FROM AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK (FROM WEST BOUNDARY & SOUTH 50 Feet 50 Feet BOUNDARYEAST AND WEST OF STEE VES AVENUE ONLY MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS Front: Principal Structure 20 feet 20 feet Accessory Structure 20 feet 20 feet Side: Principal Structure 0 Feet or'/2 of the BH '/2 of the SBH Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet Rear: Principal Structure 10 feet '/z of the BH Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between Structures Principal Structure '/2 of the SBH '/2 of the SBH Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet MAXIMUM HEIGHT Zoned: Principal Structure 3-stories not to 3-stories not to exceed 45 Feet exceed 45 Feet Accessory Structure 25 Feet 25 Feet Actual: Principal Structure 45 Feet 45 Feet Accessory Structure 25 Feet 25 Feet PRESERVE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Principal Structures 25 Feet 25 Feet Accessory Structures 10 Feet 10 Feet BH = Building Height (Zoned Height per the LDC) SBH = Sum of Building Heights Front yards shall be measured as follows: Words struck gh are deleted, words underlined are added. PL20190002494 — Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 9 of 19 Packet Pg. 2270 17.D.2 a. If the parcel is served by a public right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right of way line. Sidewalks shall be located in the right-of-way. b. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge -of -pavement (if not curbed). Setback from a lake for all principal and accessory uses may be zero feet (0') provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into the design. Architectural bank treatments shall include any structural materials used to retain earth such as concrete stone or wood placed to LDC requirements. Garages and carports shall be 10 feet from principal structures if detached. There will be a minimum of a 23 foot setback from the back of a sidewalk to front load garages. Words struck t#reug# are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002494 — Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 10 of 19 Packet Pg. 2271 17.D.2 Table III below sets forth the development standards for Commercial within the proposed Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. TABLE III COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL MINIMUM LOT AREA N.A. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH N.A. MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA OF BUILDINGS 50,000 square feet PUD PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK (FROM AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD) 25 Feet MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK (FROM WEST BOUNDARY & SOUTH BOUNDARY 50 Feet EAST AND WEST OF STEEVES AVENUE ONL Y) MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK (FROM NORTH BOUNDARY) 25 Feet Internal Drives 15 feet from edge of drive aisle Minimum Distance Between Structures 20 feet MAXIMUM HEIGHT Zoned: Principal Structure: Accessory Structure: 45 feet 25 feet Actual: Principal Structure: Accessory Structure: 57 feet 25 feet PRESERVE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Principal Structures 25 feet Accessory Structures 10 feet Setback from a lake for all principal and accessory uses may be zero feet (0') provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into the design Architectural bank treatments shall include any structural materials used to retain earth such as concrete stone or wood placed to LDC requirements. Words struck # are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002494 — Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 11 of 19 00 0 Cr) 0 N 0 aD U c c L 0 aD 0 a 0 a a� a� Packet Pg. 2272 ((`land) andW OBBIHn ueipuaw eJ »zE .1r, pdg W J Q0Ua W Q J J 0O U " o Q Q w i>- W Q W t. LL o W W 00U a Npm TL ri' U LL 0:a.4 to o oco O M l�7 Ci3 W H z Z Z CL ui M a z tjz�a Z2 z Npm Z U) 0 0 � z w U1L0 a W J � a a U 0 W 0 J 2 LL O d l.) U z F � o _ U z m 0=0 E LL a m w LJ - I n1 _ u. — 980£6) oz-S-oL eoueuipap posodoad paslAOM - d }uauayoej}d :;uawy3ej;V LU 2 o Q Ix to U) NI c � z Z ti W O ' = N yJja�i Ova / cn WU @ o O W N V%N W {i N 0.0. U) uw y > d —1 z Q l u`5 X = U 3 141 a o a to ' WU) a= ar zO ZLLJ Z Oa F- Z UJ N QQ O Lu Z j r aTG' z m z w�U 0Q a a W =w Cf W +r . 4 U. / I / L z002 < a --wIoN3WW03 1 z z a 2 1 aBAOHdw1 :3Sn 0NVI 0 g M U I L---------------------- / h-3 :ONINOZ ,_,.... 11:1'aNn05 �� / awa„rtlrmetaoean atiin.isva ss�+r t�9maSv3 sr 1 If I I I � Z j / I oa I - i g I I I I 1 I I I I I I I Loading &Unloading.2 z 'a 1 l-r 4 F- \ \ `t f \ , j \ a l� \ W.)gS9.L993AU3S3ae SY ✓::a 7 \\\ 8 b 0, !t Li CI \0»0VI1 ,L N0On I.vid 3ovaa3l�aao>botl � AwM solN�ia 3nN3AV S3A331S OV ISDO N0111M 83dO13A30 30V111A W01a3W A0 O310na1SNOO 30 010NnOWNhni Tr-i LL Z � U. W Z 5 0 W O�of co z 3 Exhibit C 03A0bdW 1 :3sn (1J :OP >1. ----- I oo� c`I aoo 1 zCLZ) z Nlo — O � 5 L era as W Wt-LL U N za 4 U)ce7o \� W N yC ix W 2 leX4L gom 0 M a U W zo'� d c.> J N � 0 M w = O O Q0 U J O — t N m r Z 0 17.D.2 EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION: un , --- -• --... . . AILL . ... _. . - _ _. . .1_ . . • _ .. ,... ._ -ftl - _=044MATAU __ .. .. - - • / 1" WEST 3 4 4.12 FEET; • • • / 1 • . • • - • • - • - - - - - - • RI -Ell • . • - - 1.61 _. IL D*LL MM • . 1. • • • - - r _ . _ rme. 01 _ • _ ALL OF MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 1 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 54 AT PAGE 38 AND 39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND, ALL OF MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55 AT PAGE 94 AND 95 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 11.68 ACRES MORE OR LESS. Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002494 — Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 13 of 19 O O O M O N O V C R L O (D U) 0 a 0 L a� a� 01 Packet Pg. 2274 17.D.2 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC: 1. A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.0 which establishes the minimum right-of-way widths to be utilized, to establish that all internal roadways shall be subject to a 50 foot right-of-way configuration. Words struck thr-eugh are deleted, words underlined are added. PL20190002494 — Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 14 of 19 Packet Pg. 2275 17.D.2 EXHIBIT F DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS: AFFORDABLE -WORKFORCE -GAP HOUSING COMMITMENT AND RESTRICTIONS: Fifteen (15%) percent of the multi -family residential dwelling units (excluding CF uses) ultimately developed within the project, shall be sold by the developer to individuals, or families that earn less than eighty (80%) percent of the Collier County median family income. For the purposes of this MPUD, these specific units shall be described as "affordable -workforce housing units". Five (5%) percent of the dwelling units ultimately developed within the project, shall be sold by the developer to individuals or families that earn less than one -hundred fifty (150%) percent of the Collier County median family income. For the purposes of this MPUD, these specific units shall be described as "affordable -gap housing units". The median income of the area as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) shall be the then current median income for the Naples Metropolitan Statistical Area, established periodically by HUD and published in the Federal Register, as adjusted for family size, in accordance with any adjustments that are authorized by HUD or any successor agency. In the event that HUD ceases to publish an established median income as aforesaid, the developer and the County shall mutually agree to a reasonable and comparable method of computing adjustments in median income. The following limitations and performance standards shall be adhered to: 1. No affordable -workforce housing until in the development shall be sold by the developer to those whose household income has not been verified and certified to be less than eighty (80%) percent of the median family income for Collier County. Such verification and certification shall be the responsibility of the developer and shall be submitted to the County Manager, or his designee for approval. 2. No affordable -gap housing unit in the development shall be sold by the developer to those whose household income has not been verified and certified to be less than one -hundred fifty (150%) percent of the median family income for Collier County. Such verification and certification shall be the responsibility of the developer and shall be submitted to the County Manager, or his designee for approval. No affordable -workforce housing unit or affordable -gap housing unit is to be sold, shall be sold, or otherwise conveyed to a buyer whose household income has not been verified and certified in accordance with this MPUD Document. It is the intent of this MPUD to keep affordable housing as such; therefore, any person who buys from the developer an affordable -workforce housing unit or an affordable -gap housing unit must agree, in a lien instrument to be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, that if the affordable -workforce or affordable -gap housing unit is sold, (including the land and/or the unit) within 15 years after its original purchase price that he/she will pay to the County an amount equal to one-half of the sales price in excess of five percent increase per year. Such payment shall be maintained in a segregated fund, established by the County solely for affordable housing purposes and such money shall be used to encourage, provide for, or promote affordable housing in Collier County. The lien instrument may be subordinated to a qualifying first mortgage. Words struclh are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002494 — Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 15 of 19 Packet Pg. 2276 17.D.2 4. No affordable -workforce housing unit or affordable -gap housing unit in any building or structure in the development shall be occupied by the developer, any person related to or affiliated with the developer, or resident manager. 5. When the developer advertises, sells, or maintains the affordable -workforce housing unit or the affordable -gap housing unit, it must advertise, sell and maintain the same in a nondiscriminatory manner and make available any relevant information to any person who is interested in purchasing such affordable-wefkfaeeworkforce housing unit or affordable -gap housing unit. The developer agrees to be responsible for payment of any real estate commission and fees for the initial sale from the developer to the buyer. 6. The developer shall submit a yearly report to the County indicating the status of the affordable - workforce and affordable -gap housing units. 7. This Affordable -Workforce -Gap Housing commitment will allow Collier County Growth Management Division permitting to be completed on an expedited basis as provided by the appropriate Collier County ordinances and resolutions. 8. The dwelling units to be offered for sale to persons meeting the affordable workforce and affordable gap housing guidelines set forth herein shall be offered for sale to such qualified persons and to Collier County or its designee beginning with the date of issuance of the building permit for each building containing said dwelling units, and continuing for six (6) months after the Certificate of Occupancy for each building containing said dwelling units is issued, after which time any unsold unit may be sold at market rates. Four (4) months after a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a building containing affordable or gap housing, the County Manager or his designee shall be notified in writing by the owner that units remain available for purchase by Collier County. ENVIRONMENTAL Preserve Area Calculation: 8.33.acres (existing vegetation) x 25% = 2.08 acres to be preserved. TRANSPORTATION: 1. Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy, and if warrants dictate, the developer shall construct an additional eastbound left turn lane on Estey Avenue at its intersection with Airport Road. The length of the turn lane is to be determined by Collier County Transportation Staff up to a maximum distance that can be accommodated along the developer's frontage. The length will further be determined given consideration to the project's access location and normal transportation engineering practices. 2. Prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy, the developer shall construct a turnaround within the existing Steeves Avenue Right -of -Way as depicted on the MPUD Master Plan. 3. The developer shall be allowed to use the existing curb cut on Airport Road during the construction of Meridian Village MPUD. Once construction of the development is completed, the developer shall convert the existing curb cut into a traffic controlled right in -right out access point. 4. The maximum trip generation allowed by the proposed uses (both primary and ancillary) may not exceed the summarized PM Peak Hour, two way trips as shown below: Words stFrea# are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002494 —Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 16 of 19 Packet Pg. 2277 17.D.2 a. For a maximum of 120 multi -family residential units (LUC 230), 70 PM Peak Hour, two way trips, or b. For a maximum of 480 units of group housing (LUC 254), 143 PM Peak Hour, two way trips, or c. For a maximum of 150 Adult day care (LUC 565), 114 PM Peak Hour, two way trips, or d. For a maximum 1,150 seat Church (LUC 560), approximately 70 PM Peak Hour two way trips (10% daily traffic), ei�and e. For a maximum 50,000 square feet of luxury auto dealership/sales (LUC840), 112 PM Peak Hour, two-way trips, limited to Tract C and e f. For all uses in the aggregate, 143 PM Peak Hour two-way trips, unless Tract C is developed with a luxury auto dealership, which would increase the aggregate to 255 two-way PM Peak Hour trips. 5. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks, and interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer. Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. 6. Relative to permitted CF uses, for services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation as determined by Collier County Staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider as directed by Collier County staff, with staffing and locations(s) as directed by the Collier County Manager or his designee. PROXIMITY OF PROPERTY TO NAPLES AIRPORT: The developer shall provide the following to the Naples Airport Authority: 1. An executed Aviation Easement and Release (first five pages), once the MPUD has been approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. A statement within the Project's Condominium or Association Documents that states the following: "The Naples Municipal Airport is located less than one mile to the Northwest of the Condominium, in close proximity to the community. Purchaser'-s can expect all the usual and common noises and disturbances created by, and incident to, the operation of the Airport". Purchasers shall acknowledge they have read the Condominium or Association Documents by signing a letter, which the developer shall send to the Naples Airport Authority. The Condominium or Homeowner's Association shall not have the right to remove this clause at any time from their documents. 3. Future SDP applications shall be forwarded to the Naples Airport Authority for review. 4. No Structures shall be placed inside the Runway Protection Zone, as labeled on the MPUD Master Plan. 5. Building Heights will comply with the Part 77 Controlling Surfaces for Naples Airport as shown on Exhibit G. Words stFuc-k thFaugh are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002494 — Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 17 of 19 Packet Pg. 2278 17.D.2 LANDSCAPING: The landscape buffer on the west property line and the south property line that extends east and west of Steeves Avenue shall contain trees with a minimum height of 12 feet spaced no more than 25 feet on center. Existing trees that can be saved within the buffer shall remain if practicable and be counted as buffer trees as allowed in the LDC. Hedges in the enhanced buffer shall be a minimum of ten gallon plants five feet in height, three feet in spread and spaced a maximum four feet on center at planting. OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR AUTO DEALERSHIP USE: 1. Vehicular loading and unloading shall be permitted only on the eastern side of the dealership building facing Airport -Pulling Road and/or southern side of the dealership facing_Estey Avenue. 2. Vehicle maintenance shall occur only indoors. Service bay_ doors shall remain closed during vehicle repair services Words stFuck threugh are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002494 — Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 18 of 19 Packet Pg. 2279 17.D.2 EXHIBIT G PART 77 CONTROLLING SURFACES FOR NAPLES AIRPORT: IKIJI�K I ` z PR PECT AV ESTIMATED BUILDING HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS ! CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE BASED I C OR P OR / ( ON FAR PART 77 (7:1 TRANSITIONAL SUR- __ o +' FACE) AND FAA NOR SLOPE ANGLE RE- i % QUIREMENTS. A SPECIFIC SITE SURVEY AND i� SPECIFIC BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATIONS MUST BE PERFORMED IN THE DESIGN PHASE,77L CERTIFIED BY A P.E. IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROPRIATE FEDERAL AVIATION REGULA- /% TIONS, AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE NAA PRIOR TO DESIGN COMPLETION RADIO RD C.R. 856 LO AINE AV; ��, WESTVIEW DR THY AV j GAIL BLVD ' ^- r d AZEL` C r 0 NORT �`f�C'nNl1T_ IR. SEA RAPE,,AV _ c co EARL ST � j. - Q 'LOTUS .r _j PL 01NSE IA AVo CREEK -'GUAVA DRY z d wLIJ d,, I H_aB1SClST ��l jZj ° 5' �P, )R RD d I 7 __ d �� '� ONUT CIR. FL E S TE Y AV Z r d w 7: ESTEY AV Q Q w o w z Ism d LTERRACE AV DAVIS BLV �R._8 - _- � _ DAVIS BLV EXTENSION ' (LSR 8_ _- -- - ONNECTICUT A i iwwon,n av 1 _ Words strre-l# are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002494 —Meridian Village MPUD Amendment Revised October 1, 2020 Page 19 of 19 Packet Pg. 2280 17.D.3 Ci0�8Y �iOT�1.Yl�y Growth Management Department Zoning Division/Comprehensive Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: Tim Finn, AICP, Principal Planner Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division Date: May 7, 2020 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) - PL20190002494 - REV 3 PETITION NAME: Meridian Village Mixed Planned Unit Development (MPUD) REQUEST: The applicant requests to create a new Tract C from the southerly 3.29 acres of Tract A and add a maximum of 50,000 square feet of gross leasable area for a new or used luxury automobile dealership use to the uses previously approved for Meridian Village via Ordinance #2010-28, as amended. In order for the use to be consistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP), the applicant has also submitted a companion small-scale GMP Amendment (GMPA) to create Meridian Village Mixed Use Subdistrict, which will allow the requested use. Submittal 2 included a revised Statement of Utility Provisions, a revised TIS, Exhibit D, Legal Description, revised PUD documents, and a revised Master Plan. Submittal 3 included a revised TIS, Exhibit A, and other PUD Exhibits also revised. LOCATION: The subject site is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Airport Road and Estey Avenue in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The f3.29-acre site is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict and is within the Coastal High Hazard Area as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. This subject site comprises the southerly portion of Tract A in the ±11.68-acre Meridian Village MPUD. The Urban Mixed Use District is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including mixed -use developments such as Planned Unit Developments. According to the FLUE in the Urban Designation Section, Urban designated areas will accommodate non-residential uses including commercial uses subject to criteria identified in the Urban Mixed Use District and as listed in the FLUE. New and used luxury auto sales use (SIC 5511 and 5599) are not listed in the Urban Designation non-residential uses, nor does the Meridian Village Community Facility PUD permit commercial uses. However, a mixed use subdistrict may be created that will allow the proposed amended PUD to be consistent with the FLUE in Section #12 under Urban Designation. The Meridian Village MPUD zoning currently permits only the following principal uses: Community Facility uses — 480 beds, Senior Residential uses — 120 DU, and Preserves; it does not currently allow commercial uses., a use permitted which would accommodate automobile dealership use. The applicant is requesting to amend the MPUD to permit a luxury automobile dealership use, a use permitted in the General Commercial District (C-4) and Heavy Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 .239-252-2400 Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 2281 17.D.3 Commercial District (C-5). The petition is only amending the southerly ::L3.29-acre portion of PUD Tract A to create a Tract C. In reviewing for compliance with Policy 5.6 (shown in italics below) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) staff provides the following analysis in [bracketed bold text.] FLUE Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety.] In reviewing for compliance with FLUE Objective 7 and related Policies (shown in italics), staff provides the following analysis in [bracketed bold text]. FLUE Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [`Exhibit C, Master Concept Plan' in the petition packet, depicts two access points: one right -in and right -out on Airport -Pulling Road (CR 31) — the eastern boundary of the subject site, which is identified as a minor arterial road in the FDOT Federal Functional Classification map in the Transportation Element of the GMP, and one full access on Estey Avenue, a local road at the southern boundary of the proposed project site. A proposed pedestrian connection from Airport Pulling Road to the Meridian Village MPUD is also shown on Exhibit C.] FLUE Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [`Exhibit C — Master Concept Plan' shows only existing roads and driveway accesses, no internal roads are depicted. If developed as multiple tracts, all would be accessed internally.] FLUE Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [`Exhibit C - Master Concept Plan' does not indicate any interconnections with adjoining properties. To the north lies Rock Creek then a recreational vehicle campground. To the east lies Airport Pulling Road; to the south lies Estey Avenue; to the west lies residential dwelling units. Staff does not see an opportunity to have an interconnection with this project site.] FLUE Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [There are existing sidewalks along Airport -Pulling Road and Estey Avenue. The Exhibit C — Master Concept Plan does not depict any details of sidewalks, open spaces, civic facilities, or housing details. A maximum of 120 residential dwelling units for this PUD are approved. The PUD document details the f2.08-acre preserve area in Tract B. No deviations are requested for sidewalks; therefore, the project will be subject to L.D.C. requirements for sidewalks.] CONCLUSION: Based on the above analysis, staff finds the subject petition NOT consistent with the FLUE; however, the petition may be deemed consistent IF the companion GMP amendment is adopted and becomes effective. The PUDA Ordinance needs to contain an effective date linked to the effective date of the companion GMPA. Petition on CityView cc: Anita Jenkins, AICP, Community Planning Manager, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond V. Bellows, Manager, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 .239-252-2400 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 2282 17.D.5 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened Q securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. p 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action a has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the �- petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s a NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. c . r _ _ _. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE L Cd L STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER aoo 0 M BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED SHARON UMPENHOUR WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET UK Y.U. BUX, Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician for Q. _Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 15th day of September , 2020, by Sharon Umpenhour, personally known to me and who didMid not take an oath. !!Yl ,. CARIN J. DWYER *, .- My COMMISSION # GG 982367 pp��E�X�yPIRES: May 14, 2024 y '•E,OF 1LVo BrMW hiu Notary Public t�FIi�a�wrlkn My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Signature of tary Public Carin J. Dwyer Printed Name of Notary Public Rev. 31412015 Packet Pg. 2283 17.D.5 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE'� MERIDIAN VILLAGE MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT i GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AND MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD AMENDMENT PETITION N0. PL201900024961CPSS-2020-01 & PL20190002494, CCPC: OCTOBER 1, 2020 9:00 a.m. BCC: NOVEMBER 10, 2020 9:00 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3RD FLOOR 3299 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES. FL 34112 SUE FAULKNER 239-252-5715 & TIMOTHY FINN, AICP: 239-252-431Z MERIDIAN VILLAGE MG(�:: I , STRICT GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN A-1 �'NONIENT AND MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD AMENDMENT PETITION NO. PL20190002496/CPSS-2020-01 & PL20190002494 CCPC: OCTOBER 1, 2020 -• 9:00 a.m. BCC: NOVEMBER 10, 2020 - 9:00 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3RO FLOOR 3299 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FL 34112 .SUE FAULKNER: Z39.262-6115 & TIMOTHY FINN, AICP: 239-252-4312, °PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE' MERIDIAN VILLAGE MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AND MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD AMENDMENT PETITION NO. PL20190002496/CPSS-2020-01 & PL20190002494.I CCPC: OCTOBER 1, 2020 - 9:00 a.m. BCC: NOVEMBER 10, 2020 - 9.00 a.m. -- COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3RD FLOOR 3299 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FL 34112 ,.SUE FAULKNER: 139 252-5715 & TLMOTHY FINN, AICP; 239-252-4312, Packet Pg. 2284 Co er Count COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.eov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 For Petition Number(s); PL20190002496 and PL20190002494 Regarding the above subject petition number(s), Porcha Land Holdings LLC (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: Todd E. Rosenthal As Managing Member Signature*: 0 Applicant ❑ Legal Counsel to Applicant Date: -2//-) ) * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. Packet Pg. 2285 Q`b) 17.017 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Of INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE(S) tiae.is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on ember 10,`20.0, commencing at 9:00 a.m., in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber, Third Floor, lief County Government Center, 8299 Tamiami Trail E., Naples, FL. e purpose of the hearing is to consider: p AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FL�IRIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH %yMANA¢ �M!ENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIPRALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES TO CREATE THE MERIDIAN VILLAGE MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY FROM THE URBAN DESIGNATION, URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT TO THE URBAN DESIGNATION, URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT, MERIDIAN VILLAGE MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF LUXURY AUTO DEALERSHIPUSES IN ADDITION TO COMMUNITY FACILITY USES INCLUDING YOUTH CENTERS, CHURCHES, GROUP CARE, FAMILY CARE, ADULT DAY CARE, AND SENIOR HOUSING. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD AND ESTEY AVENUE IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 3.29m ACRES; AND FURTHERMORE, DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20190002496] 8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 10-28, AS AMENDED, THE MERIDIAN VILLAGE MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO REDESIGNATE PROPERTY FROM TRACT A, COMMUNITY FACILITY, TO TRACT C, COMMERCIAL; TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF LUXURY AUTO DEALERSHIP USES IN ADDITION TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED COMMUNITY FACILITY USES INCLUDING YOUTH CENTERS, CHURCHES, GROUP CARE, FAMILY CARE, ADULT DAY CARE, AND SENIOR HOUSING ON TRACT C. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF AIRPORT -PULLING ROADAND ESTEY AVENUE IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 11.68s ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20190002494] N Radio RD 0 Project Location z J J a S�hgV o CL Davis BLVD VAI All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE(S) will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL., between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Suite 401, Collier County Government Center, East Naples, one week prior to the, scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to November 10, 2020 will be read and considered at the public hearing. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercount fy_I.aov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@colliercountvfl.ao . Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division; located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BURT L. SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: Martha Vergara Deputy Clerk (SEAL) ND-GC10514247-01 Packet Pg. 2286 Meridian Village MPUD (PL20190002494) Application and Supporting Documents October 11, 2020 CCPC Hearing ® GradyMinor Civf] Fngfneem • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects January 10, 2020 Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP Collier County Growth Management Division/ Planning and Regulation Land Development Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Meridian Village MPUD Amendment — PL20190002494, Submittal 1 Dear Mr. Finn: A Collier County application for Public Hearing for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for properties located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Airport -Pulling Road and Estey Avenue is being filed electronically for review. This application proposes to amend a 3.29 +/- acre portion of the Meridian Village MPUD, which has been platted as Tract 1 in Plat Book 54, Pages 38 & 39, to add up to 50,000 square feet of gross leasable area for a new or used luxury automobile dealership use to the uses previously approved by Ordinance 2010-28 and as amended by Ordinance 2013-47. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover Letter 2. Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone 3. Evaluation Criteria 4. Pre -application meeting notes 5. Affidavit of Authorization 6. Property Ownership Disclosure Form 7. Covenant of Unified Control 8. Completed Addressing Checklist 9. Warranty Deed(s) 10. Plat Book 54 Pages 38-39 11. Aerial Location Map 12. Environmental Data Requirements 13. Traffic Impact Study Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP RE: Meridian Village MPUD Amendment — PL20190002494, Submittal 1 January 10, 2020 Page 2 of 2 14. Revised PUD Exhibits A-F 15. Original PUD document Please feel free to contact Rich Yovanovich at 435-3535 or me should you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Porcha Land Holdings LLC Richard D. Yovanovich Rock Creek Holdings LLC GradyMinor File CO*Br County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD of PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑ PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑■ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. aPPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Porcha Land Holdings LLC Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 1250 Airport Road S City: Naples Telephone: 239.206.1657 Cell: E-Mail Address: todd@naplesmotorsports.com State: FL ZIP: 34104 Name of Agent: D. Wayne Arnold and Richard Yovanovich Firm: Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A Address: 3800 Via Del Rey Telephone: 239-947-1144 and 239-435-3535 Cell: Fax: and Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. City: Bonita Springs State: FL ZIP: 34134 Fax: E-Mail Address: warnold@gradyminor.com and rovanovich@cyklaw.com Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. February 1, 2019 Page 1 of 11 CO*Br County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT WWW.C011iergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: Meridian village MPUD Zoning district(s) to the Meridian Village MPUD zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Community Facility and undeveloped Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Community Facility, residential and commercial Original PUD Name: Meridian Village MPUD Ordinance No.: 2010-28 and 2013-47 PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: �5�25 Lot: N.A. Block: N.A. Subdivision: Meridian Village Phase 1 (Tract 1) Metes & Bounds Description: See Plat Book 54, Page 39 Plat Book: 54 Page #: 38 & 39 Property I.D. Number: 60090000021 Size of Property: Irregular ft. x Irregular ft. = 143,312+/- Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 3.29+/- Address/ General Location of Subject Property: Northwest corner of Estey Avenue and Airport Road S. PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 Q ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Community Facilities 0 Mixed Use ❑ Other: ❑ Industrial February 1, 2019 Page 2 of 11 CO*Br County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N TTRVC RV Campground and Park S C-5 and Salvation Army PUD Used car dealer and commercial E C-4 Commercial W RMF-6 Residential If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: N.A. /N.A. /N.A. Lot: N.A. Block: N.A. Subdivision: N.A. Plat Book: N.A. Page #: N.A. Property I.D. Number: N.A. Metes & Bounds Description: N.A. ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/]ndex.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Oak Forest Villas Homeowners Association, Inc. Mailing Address: 2180 Immokalee Road, #309 City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34110 Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: February 1, 2019 Page 3 of 11 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net EVALUATION CRITERIA 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. February 1, 2019 Page 4 of 11 CO*Br County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? N.A. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. February 1, 2019 Page 5 of 11 CO*Br County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Porcha Land Holdings, LLC Address: 1250 Airport Road S City: Naples Telephone:239.206.1657 Cell: E-Mail Address: todd@naplesmotorsports.com Address of Subject Property (If available): 1062 Airport Rd. S. City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34104 r20PERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: �5�25 Lot: N.A. Block: N.A. Subdivision: Meridian Village Phase Metes & Bounds Description: See Plat Book 54, Page 39 Plat Book: 54 State: FL Fax: Page #: 38 & 39 Property I.D. Number: 60090000021 ZIP: 34104 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System x❑ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System ❑ I TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I Check applicable system: a. County Utility System ❑ b. City Utility System x❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) ❑ Total Population to be Served: No net increase Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: Average Daily: B. Sewer -Peak: Average Daily: If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: February 1, 2019 Page 6 of 11 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. N.A. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. N.A. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. February 1, 2019 Page 7 of 11 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Meridian Village MPUD, Property I.D. Number 60090000021 1062 Airport Rd. S. (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for M planned unit development M 0, an.vi M Koester. i A,,, P A and Cdaman, ( PUD) zoning. We hereby designate legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this who is personally known to me or has produced Owner Printed Name day of 201_ by as identification. Notary Public (Name typed, printed or stamped) February 1, 2019 Page 8 of 11 CO*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ■❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 0 ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 0 ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 0 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 0 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ 0 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ 0 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 0 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ El Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ 0 Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 ❑ ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ El School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ El Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ ❑ 0 List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ 0 ❑ Checklist continues on next page February 1, 2019 Page 9 of 11 CO*Br County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ 0 ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ 0 ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 0 ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ 0 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: El School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart El conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ I City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre X PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre X Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 X Transportation Review Fees: X Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 February 1, 2019 Page 10 of 11 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net X Legal Advertising Fees: X CCPC: $1,125.00 X BCC: $500.00 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. La Feb 20, 2020 Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Printed named of signing party February 1, 2019 Page 11 of 11 Meridian Village MPUD (PL20190002494) Evaluation Criteria Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. Provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. The Meridian Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) is a 11.68± acre property located northwest corner of the intersection of Airport -Pulling Road and Estey Avenue. The property is Designated Urban Residential, Urban Mixed Use Residential on the Future Land Use Map. The property is currently zoned Meridian Village MPUD. The applicant proposes to amend the MPUD to add a new or used luxury automobile dealership to the list of permitted uses. A small-scale growth management plan amendment has been filed for a 3.29 +/- acre portion of the Meridian Village MPUD, which has been platted as Tract 1 of the Meridian Village Subdivision. The proposed commercial use will be limited only to that portion of the MPUD and the only permitted commercial use will be a new or used luxury automobile dealership. The PUD document and conceptual MPUD master plan have been revised to indicate the limited area for the commercial use with a maximum leasable area of 50,000 square feet. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The planned unit development is located in an area, which has been designated for residential development on the County's Future Land Use Map. However, this property was previously zoned for commercial and multi -family land uses. As part of the County's Zoning Evaluation program in 1989, it was deemed consistent by policy. The property immediately located to the south across Estey Avenue is zoned C-5 and PUD and is developed with a used vehicle dealership and Salvation Army, which permits a variety of religious and social services. The properties located to the east across Airport Road are zoned C-4, General Commercial and are developed with a variety of commercial land uses including a gas/convenience store and thrift store. North of the proposed commercial tract is the Beach House Assisted Living and Memory Care Facility. The portion of the site proposed for commercial uses has been previously cleared and filled and has water, sewer and internal roadway access available. Buffers will be established consistent with those required by the Collier County Land Development Code. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained December 16, 2019 Page 1 of 9 MVPA-19 Evaluation Criteria.docx ® Gradyf0inor C€vlI Enginurs • band Survcyors • Y]anncrs • I,andscapc Archltccts Meridian Village MPUD (PL20190002494) Evaluation Criteria at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the countyattorney. The subject MPUD has two property owners. The applicant is the owner of Tract 1 of the Meridian Village Subdivision. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) Future Land Use Element: The 11.68± project is designated Urban Residential, Urban Mixed Use Residential on the Future Land Use Map. A small-scale amendment application has been filed for a 3.29-acre portion of the MPUD. The proposed Meridian Village Mixed Use Subdistrict will permit a new or used luxury automobile dealership, as well as residential and community facility uses presently permitted in the MPUD and consistent with the Future Land Use Element. The portion of the property proposed to permit commercial land uses was previously zoned C- 4, General Commercial and deemed consistent by policy under the County's zoning re- evaluation program. In 2006, the property owner rezoned the property to the Meridian Village MPUD and did not include commercial uses in the approved MPUD. Current policies in the Future Land Use Element do not provide a mechanism to re-establish the previously approved commercial land uses; therefore, the small-scale amendment is required to permit the limited commercial use. Policies 5.3 and 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element require that rezonings must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Upon approval of the companion small-scale growth management plan amendment, which will establish the Meridian Village Mixed Use District, the proposed MPUD amendment may be deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Policies 5.5 and 5.7 of the Future Land Use Element discourage urban sprawl by confining urban intensities of development to those areas designated Urban on the Future Land Use Map. The proposed addition of commercial uses to a portion of the Meridian Village MPUD represents infill development, in an area having immediate access to urban services. Policy 5.6 requires that new developments shall be compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses as set forth in the Land Development Code. The proposed uses are consistent with those commercial uses previously permitted on the property prior to the 2006 rezoning and are less intense than properties located immediately south of the property. December 16, 2019 Page 2 of 9 MVPA-19 Evaluation Criteria.docx ® GradyMinor C€vlI Enginurs • band Survcyors • Y]anncrs • I,andscapc Archltccts Meridian Village MPUD (PL20190002494) Evaluation Criteria Commercial development will include appropriate buffers and other development standards to ensure that the uses developed on the 3.29-acre commercial tract will be compatible with the residential uses located immediately west of the MPUD. A landscape buffer currently exists and was installed concurrent with development of the assisted living facility, which has been developed on the northern portion of the site. Objective 7 and the implementing policies promote interconnection with adjoining neighborhoods and streets. The project has direct access to both Airport -Pulling Road and Estey Avenue. There are no available connections to the west due to development of homes immediately adjacent to the MPUD boundary. Connections to the north are not feasible due to the recorded on -site preserve area and the presence of Rock Creek. Transportation Element: Policy 5.1 requires that all projects are evaluated to determine their effect on the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR. This MPUD application includes a comprehensive assessment of the transportation impacts associated with the project. Public Facilities Element: The property is served by potable water and sanitary sewer services. Water is provided by the City of Naples and sanitary sewer service is provided by Collier County Utilities. No capacity issues have been identified or are anticipated in the future. The site will require a modification of a previously issued South Florida Water Management District permit for improvements related to the proposed commercial uses on a portion of the site. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Policy 6.1.1 requires that developments containing native vegetation communities must retain a minimum of 25% of the existing native vegetation on -site for mixed use or commercial developments. The site has previously been developed and infrastructure has been installed throughout the development tracts of the MPUD. The MPUD approval in 2010 required 25% of the existing native vegetation to be retained, which resulted in a preservation area of 2.08 acres to be established for the MPUD. This area has been set aside as Tract Bin the MPUD and meets the criteria required for a mixed -use project. The applicant proposes no changes to the previously established 2.08 acre preserve and is consistent with the policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. December 16, 2019 Page 3 of 9 MVPA-19 Evaluation Criteria.docx ® GradyiVlinor C€vlI Enginurs • I,and Survcyors • PIanncrs • I,andscapc Archltccts Meridian Village MPUD (PL2O19OOO2494) Evaluation Criteria d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The existing MPUD provides for a 15' wide Type B landscape buffer which has previously been installed along the property's western boundary. This buffer type is consistent with that required when a non-residential use abuts a residential use. The applicant has not proposed any modification from the previously required 50' building setback from the western MPUD boundary, nor have building heights been increased within the MPUD. The amended MPUD as proposed will continue to be internally and externally compatible. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The project will provide a minimum of 30% open space consistent with the requirements of the LDC, which will include native vegetation preserve areas, lakes, buffers and recreational areas. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The proposed development of commercial uses will not require phasing due to infrastructure availability. Adequate infrastructure is in place at the project site to service the proposed commercial uses. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The MPUD boundary is not proposed to be modified and cannot be expanded due to existing development to the west, existing public roadways to the south and east, and Rock Creek located to the north. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The MPUD includes development standards and conditions which will assure compatible and complementary development. No new deviations have been requested from the Land Development Code. 10.02.08 - Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas December 16, 2019 Page 4 of 9 MVPA-19 Evaluation Criteria.docx ® GradyiMinor C€vlI Enginurs • I,and Survcyors • PIanncrs • I,andscapc Archltccts Meridian Village MPUD (PL20190002494) Evaluation Criteria Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08 E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Future Land Use Element: The 11.68± project is designated Urban Residential, Urban Mixed Use Residential on the Future Land Use Map. A small-scale amendment application has been filed for a 3.29-acre portion of the MPUD. The proposed Meridian Village Mixed Use Subdistrict will permit a new and used luxury automobile dealership, as well as residential and community facility uses presently permitted in the MPUD and consistent with the Future Land Use Element. The portion of the property proposed to permit commercial land uses was previously zoned C- 4, General Commercial and deemed consistent by policy under the County's zoning re- evaluation program. In 2006, the property owner rezoned the property to the Meridian Village MPUD and did not include commercial uses in the approved MPUD. Current policies in the Future Land Use Element do not provide a mechanism to re-establish the previously approved commercial land uses. Policies 5.3 and 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element require that rezonings must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Upon approval of the companion small-scale growth management plan amendment, which will establish the Meridian Village Mixed Use District, the proposed MPUD amendment may be deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Policies 5.5 and 5.7 of the Future Land Use Element discourage urban sprawl by confining urban intensities of development to those areas designated Urban on the Future Land Use Map. The proposed addition of commercial uses to a portion of the Meridian Village MPUD represents infill development, in an area having immediate access to urban services. Policy 5.6 requires that new developments shall be compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses as set forth in the Land Development Code. The proposed uses are consistent with those commercial uses previously permitted on the property prior to the 2006 rezoning and are less intense than properties located immediately south of the property. Commercial development will include appropriate buffers and other development standards to ensure that the uses developed on the 3.29-acre commercial tract will be compatible with the residential uses located immediately west of the MPUD. A landscape buffer currently December 16, 2019 Page 5 of 9 MVPA-19 Evaluation Criteria.docx ® GradyMinor C€vlI Enginurs • band Survcyors • Y]anncrs • I,andscapc Archltccts Meridian Village MPUD (PL20190002494) Evaluation Criteria exists and was installed concurrent with development of the assisted living facility which has been developed on the northern portion of the site. Objective 7 and the implementing policies promote interconnection with adjoining neighborhoods and streets. The project has direct access to both Airport -Pulling Road and Estey Avenue. There are no available connections to the west due to development of homes immediately adjacent to the MPUD boundary. Connections to the north are not feasible due to the recorded on -site preserve area and the presence of Rock Creek. Transportation Element: Policy 5.1 requires that all projects are evaluated to determine their effect on the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR. This MPUD application includes a comprehensive assessment of the transportation impacts associated with the project. Public Facilities Element: The property is served by potable water and sanitary sewer services. Water is provided by the City of Naples and sanitary sewer service is provided by Collier County Utilities. No capacity issues have been identified or are anticipated in the future. The site will require a modification of a previously issued South Florida Water Management District permit for improvements related to the proposed commercial uses on a portion of the site. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Policy 6.1.1 requires that developments containing native vegetation communities must retain a minimum of 25% of the existing native vegetation on -site for mixed use or commercial developments. The site has previously been developed and infrastructure has been installed throughout the development tracts of the MPUD. The MPUD approval in 2010 required 25% of the existing native vegetation to be retained, which resulted in a preservation area of 2.08 acres to be established for the MPUD. This area has been set aside as Tract Bin the MPUD and meets the criteria required for a mixed -use project. The applicant proposes no changes to the previously established 2.08 acre preserve and is consistent with the policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. 2. The existing land use pattern. December 16, 2019 Page 6 of 9 MVPA-19 Evaluation Criteria.docx ® GradyiVlinor C€vlI Enginurs • I,and Survcyors • PIanncrs • I,andscapc Archltccts Meridian Village MPUD (PL20190002494) Evaluation Criteria The subject property is located at the intersection of a collector and arterial roadway. The properties located to the east and south are of similar commercial intensity to those existing. Properties to the west are zoned RMF-6 and are developed with single family and duplex homes. Buffers have been installed consistent with the LDC to insure compatibility of uses. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The MPUD is existing and therefore no isolated district is being created. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The boundaries are not illogically drawn and comprise all of the property under the unified control of the applicant. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The property is currently zoned Meridian Village MPUD. The MPUD does not provide for any commercial land uses; therefore, the MPUD must be amended to permit the commercial land uses. A companion small-scale amendment has been filed which has demonstrated the demand for additional commercial uses in this area. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The MPUD document includes development standards to ensure that it is compatible with the immediately surrounding properties. The MPUD master plan identifies appropriate buffers and open spaces, which will further insure that the development of the residential community will have no adverse impacts to the neighborhood. Access to the project is from Estey Avenue. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. A traffic impact analysis has been submitted in support of the proposed amendment. No level of service issues have been identified and the site will have access to a signalized intersection at Estey Avenue and Airport -Pulling Road. The character of traffic will not be discernably different than that historically permitted for the subject property, or the type of traffic December 16, 2019 Page 7 of 9 MVPA-19 Evaluation Criteria.docx ® GradyiVlinor C€vlI Enginurs • I,and Survcyors • PIanncrs • I,andscapc Archltccts Meridian Village MPUD (PL20190002494) Evaluation Criteria currently utilizing Estey Avenue. Estey Avenue serves existing commercial, community facility and residential uses. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The project will be required to obtain an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) through the South Florida Water Management District. The ERP review evaluates historic surface water flows and controls the off -site discharge of stormwater from the site. The project will have internal water management facilities including detention areas to control the drainage for the project. No drainage issues will result from this project. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Given the limitation on building heights, setbacks, and the existing buffering, there will be no reduction in light or air for adjacent properties. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The MPUD amendment proposes to re-establish commercial land uses that have historically been permitted on the property. The uses are controlled by development standards in the MPUD document which provide setbacks from residential land uses greater than the C-4 zoning that previously existed on the site. Development subject to the MPUD standards will not adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. All immediately adjacent properties are developed, and the addition of commercial land uses consistent with those permitted on the site for decades should not be a deterrent to improvement or redevelopment of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The MPUD amendment is a companion to a small-scale growth management plan amendment. This process does not grant a special privilege to a property owner and the process is consistent with the process outlined in Chapter 163, F.S. for amendments to growth management plan. December 16, 2019 Page 8 of 9 MVPA-19 Evaluation Criteria.docx ® Gradyiklinor C€vlI Enginurs • I,and Survcyors • PIanncrs • I,andscapc Archltccts Meridian Village MPUD (PL2O19OOO2494) Evaluation Criteria 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The existing zoning is Meridian Village MPUD which does not permit commercial land uses. The amendment is necessary to establish commercial land use within the MPUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed amendment is in scale with the needs of the neighborhood and Collier County. The square footage of commercial uses, as well as the type of uses has been established in the MPUD and limited to only a new and used luxury automobile dealership. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed commercial use; however, this site historically permitted general commercial land uses and has existing infrastructure including roads, water, and sewer available to serve the project. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The subject property is partially developed with an assisted living facility and internal infrastructure. The area proposed for commercial uses has been cleared and filled and there are no obstacles to construct the proposed uses. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. There are adequate roadways and utilities available at the site. There are no public facilities deficiencies at the present time, and none will occur as a result of this project. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The project is consistent with the proposed Meridian Village Mixed Use Subdistrict of the Growth Management Plan and it is compatible with surrounding development. December 16, 2019 Page 9 of 9 MVPA-19 Evaluation Criteria.docx ® Gradyiklinor C€vlI Enginurs • band Survcyors • Y]anncrs • I,andscapc Archltccts Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PUDA Date and Time: Tuesday, 10/29/19 1:30PM Assigned Planner: Timothy Finn Engineering Manager (for PPUs and FP's): Project Information Project Name: Meridian Vill PropertylD#: 6009000021 Current Zoning: MPUD 1062 Airport Project Address: Road South City: Naples State: FL Applicant: Sharon Umpenhour Zip: 34104 Q.Uraay Minor& AsscciateS,P.A. Agent Name: D. Wayne Arnold Phone: (239) 947-1144 Bonita Agent/Firm Address:3800 Via Del Ray City: Springs State: FL Zip: 34134 Property Owner: Rock Creek Holdings LLC Please provide the following, if applicable: vi. Total Acreage: Proposed # of Residential Units: Proposed Commercial Square Footage: For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 1 of 5 Col[eer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. CfF If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddletonto�naolesaov.com Allyson Holland AMHollandfa)naDlesaov.com Robin Singer RSinaerta)naolesoov.com Erica Martin emartinanaDlesaov.com Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 2 of 5 Coi y County 0 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated 11fitGc hUj 1 W" r0j) NorAW)i If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if J the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddleton(cDnaolesclov.com Allyson Holland AMHolland cDnaolesgov.com Robin Singer RSinqer(@.naplesciov.com Erica Martin emartin(tanaolesnov.com Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 7/11/2019 Page Q40f 5 ' 7 5 Transportation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Transportation Planning _ � q C)cu " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous "Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development." Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes 1 s t C re_J:S i t c 7- II Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 7/11/2019 Page 13 of5 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL � PL_aA9C0oa494 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 david.anthony@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Claudine Auclair GMD Operations and Regulatory Management 252-5887 claudine.auclair@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sally Ashkar Assistant County Attorney 252-8842 sally.ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alexandra Casanova Operations Coordinator 252-2658 Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Clarke Operations Coordinator 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Prin. Environmental Specialist 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Division 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jeremy Frantz LDC Manager 252-2305 Jeremy. Frantz@colliercounI. ov ❑ James French Growth Management Deputy Department Head 252-5717 james.french@co liercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Division 252-2484 colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Henderlong Principal Planner 252-2464 rchard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov Erin Jose hitis Environmental Specialist, Senior 252-2915 erin.josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marcia.kendall@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Gil Martinez ZoningPrincipal Planner 252-4211 ilbert.martinez@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl. ov Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 4 of 5 Cote COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 lI Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov Ll Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.maxam@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandy.otero@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard @colliercountyfl. ov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2708 james.sabo@colliergo.net Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 carby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Development Review - Zoning 252-2460 chris.scott@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Camden Smith Zoning Operations Manager 252-1042 camden.smith@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 mark.strain@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ MarkTem leton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistent 252-2306 david.weeks@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zonin 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Daniel Zunzune ui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Danie].Zunzuneizui@colliercountvfl.gov DK EIIQ,) muccc�-0PtmJlon5 Coorchrrrbr- zDL-S7S8 Ellen, nlUrrc�IQCaIIlerconiv{j,S�J Additional Attendee Contact Information: 1 Name Representing Phone Email Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 5 of 5 MW Ccc� Collier Convit y Growth Management Department Zoning Division Applicont/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL20180001858 Meridian Village (MPUD) PRE-APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Camden Smith, (Ops Staff) STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Sharon Umpenhour / 239-947-1144 / sumpenhour@gradyminor.com • Agent to list for PL# Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. / D. Wayne Arnold • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) 60090000021 • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) Planned Unit Development Amendment • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): PUD amendment to allow general commercial uses including automotive sales. • Details about Project (choose type that applies): MPUD- REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name Sharon Umpenhour Title Senior Planning Technician Email sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Phone 239-947-1144 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zoring DMsion • 2000 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252-2400 • www.colfagau.net Cot[ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-63SS The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountvfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of amendment is necessary 1 El Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized 1 Property Ownershio Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 0 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ } Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include - copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ Is Traffic Impact Study 1 ❑ Historical Survey 1 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the UDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ �/ }� ❑ Checklist continues on next page February 1, 2019 Page 9 of 11 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %z" x 11" copy ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement `The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description X Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contactthe Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other:. _.�� City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: I ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION I Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre X PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre �( Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application N1pc meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 y�( Transportation Review Fees: 4( Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 February 1, 2019 Page 10 of 11 Coll Y County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. 'Additional fee for the 5' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party Date February 1, 2019 Page 11 of 11 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20190002494and PL20190002496 1, Todd E. Rosenthal (print name), as Managing Member (title, if applicable) of Porcha Holdings, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant=contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorizeC Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. and Colemao,Vovanovich&Koester, P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member" • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. q tPLb Ljt J Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on) 6Ppdd DM ; by Todd E. Rosenthal name of person providing oath or affirmation), as Managing Member who i ersonally know me ho has pro ed (type of identification) as identification. STAMP/SEAL Ign ture of Jotary P IIC rr g�,,��ww� """�, SARANtCNF1t.Et�t011ONRIWO g j WCOMMIN NiFF90EW) %�fTit„o' BvdsdTANNNgypNhV4Uffi*N CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/24/14 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the C. percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership Porcha Land Holdings LLC - Todd E. Rosenthal, Managing Member 100 If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE list the beneficiaries of the trust with the ercentage otinterest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the enerai ana/or umitea partners: Name and Address % of Ownershin N.A. e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the racers, stocKnomers, aenericianes, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownershin N.A. Date of Contract: f. If anv contingencv clause or rontrart terms invnlva arirlitinnal nnrtioc 6ct III ..r officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address N.A. g. Date subject property acquired 1 2/201 9 ❑ Leased: Term of lease _ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 6, COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Date of option: Date option terminates: Anticipated closing date: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 or AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Date �Qcy � 1 `c1Jt✓�� Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Electronic Articles of Organization For Florida Limited Liability Company Article I The name of the Limited Liability Company is: PORCHA LAND HOLDINGS LLC Article II L19000288938 FILED 8:00 AM November 21, 2019 Sec. Of State jafason The street address of the principal office of the Limited Liability Company is: 1250 AIRPORT ROAD SOUTH NAPLES, FL. US 34104 The mailing address of the Limited Liability Company is: 1250 AIRPORT ROAD SOUTH NAPLES, FL. US 34104 Article III The name and Florida street address of the registered agent is: WWMR STATUTORY AGENT, LLC 9045 STRADA STELL COURT 4TH FLOOR NAPLES, FL. 34109 Having been named as registered agent and to accept service of process for the above stated limited liability company at the place designated in this certificate, I hereby accept the appointment as registered agent and agroe to act in this capacity. I further agree to comply with the provisions of all statutes relating to the proper and complete performance of my duties, and I am familiar with and accept the obligations of my position as registered agent. Registered Agent Signature: MICHAEL L. MICHETTI Article IV The name and address of person(s) authorized to manage LLC: Title: MOR TODD E ROSENTHAL 1250 AIRPORT ROAD SOUTH NAPLES, FL. 34104 US Article V The effective date for this Limited Liability Company shall be: 11/20/2019 Signature of member or an authorized representative Electronic Signature: TODD E. ROSENTHAL L19000288938 FILED 8:00 AM November 21, 2019 Sec. Of State jafason I am the member or authorized representative submitting these Articles of Organization and affirm that the facts stated herein are true. I am aware that false information submitted in a document to the Department of State constitutes a third degree felony as provided for in s.817.155, F.S. I understand the requirement to file an annual report between January 1 st and May 1 st in the calendar year following formation of the LLC and every year thereafter to maintain "active" status. Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Property I.D. Number E30090000021 1062 Airport Rd. S. (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for M planned unit development (M PUD) zoning. We hereby designate ...°°o— legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner Owner Todd E. Rosenthal as Managing Member of Porcha Land Holdings, LLC Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this 6 day of vim. 201_qby Todd e. Rosenthal who i ersonally know to me or has produced as'dentification. y Publi (Name typed, printed or stamped) .t July 30, 2018 A;6:l:t2�,- SARAMICHELLELEE LOUGHRIDOE Page 8 of 11 ', WCOMMIBSIONIFF9MI EVIRES:IgH21,2020 C EXHIBIT "A„ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND TRACT 1, MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 1, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Pint Book 54, Pages 38 and 39, Inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Parcel ID No, 60090000021 Street Address; 1062 Airport Road S. Naples, FL 34104 Containing +/- 3.29 acres 15 Colfler county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD—Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑o OTHER PUD Amendment and GMP Amendment LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) Meridian Village Phase 1, Tract 1 - S2/T50/R25 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 60090000021 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) N.A. LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Meridian Village PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 Coflie-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: ❑• Email Applicant Name: Sharon Umpenhour ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Phone: 239-947-1144 Email/Fax: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 1062 Site Zone Parcel No 60090000021 Address RD SORT Site City NAPLES *Note 34104 Name / Address I ROCK CREEK HOLDINGS LLC 2670 HORSESHOE DR N STE 201 Citv I NAPLES I State I FL I Zia 134104 1 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5A02 486250 A 15A02 2 50 25 3.29 Legal I MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 1 TRACT 1 Milla a Areas 85 Millacie Rates v *Calculations Sub./Condo 486250 - MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 1 School Other Total Use Code O 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 Latest Sales History 2017 Certified Tax Roll Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality Sub'ect to Chan e Date Book -Page Amount Land Value $ 411,250 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 411,250 (_) Assessed Value $ 411,250 (_) School Taxable Value $ 411,250 (_) Taxable Value $ 411,250 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Meridian Village MPUD Parcel No. 60090000021 N W 14 E S A► I s — � _ Q� TV Poiris ttla AVE lotI , SUBJECT — PROPERTY 16k ' &HIBISCUSAVEW 1 �r w sta'Ge•g pis) D, IGN a d 4he GIS User r mGradyMinor 170 85 0 170 Feet Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 1 SHEET 1 OF 2 DEDICA TIONS 5TA TE OF FL ORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT ROCK CREEK HOLDINGS LLC THE OWNER OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED HEREON HAVE CAUSED THIS PLAT OF MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 1 TO BE MADE A DEDICA TE TO COLLIER COUNTY I ROAD RIGHT -OF- WA Y EASEMENTS AS RECORDED IN 0 R 1680 PG 774 AND 0 R 1517 PG 2094 AS DEPICTED WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE UN ER,SIGN D OWNER HAS CAUSED THESE PRESENTS TO BE SIGNED THIS 1L DA Y OF� �lwW /2013 A D Wl7N E ----------- ------ NA TORE -J4 PRINTLy— SIGNA TUBE --- PRINT NAME ROCK REEK DIN LLC BY _ — —------ -------- MICHAE METCALF MANAGER A SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN A PORTION OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 0 D < 2 NAPLES FTI ROAD N( RCE C C 6 C N ROAD OD OOLTER 3Ei� 4 - �' AIRPORT o m� �, 35 ��SALVATIC AIRPORT _ ,� R N1 � PULLING � C R 31) m '- cn PROGE�CONIME�CENTER N5-, COUNTYRADIO SQUARE TER 12 SITE o LIVINGSTO 0 KINGS LAhE FO�CFIRE oD o N1APLE1� 0 VICINITY MAP N T S NOTICE THIS PLAT AS RECORDED IN ITS GRAPHIC FORM, IS THE OFFICIAL DEPICTION OF THE SUBDIVIDED LANDS DESCRIBED HEREIN AND WILL IN NO CIRCUMSTANCES BE SUPPLANTED IN AUTHORITY BY ANY OTHER GRAPHIC OR DIGITAL FORM OF THE PLAT THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE NOT RECORDED ON THIS PLAT THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY { ', L� i IV L_. , Vie, COUNTY APPROVALS ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS PLAT APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA THIS _1_2-t-- DAY OF SEM-CM S E V-- 2013 AD JKC MCKENNA P E IER COUNTY ENGINEER COUNTY SURVEYOR THIS PLAT REVIEWED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY SURVEYOR THIS _l9 DAY OF SE�7Elri/-4EiC _ 2013 A D MARCUS L BERMAN P S M #5086 COLLIER COUNTY SURVEYOR COUNTY ATTORNEY THIS PLAT APPROVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY THIS aL" DAY OF cS�i'Nr btr 2013 A D \ ... X {' E M I LY P EP I ---��----------- ,� C, j s I) 1 ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY I 11 COUNTY COMMISSION APPROVAL G ( A f THIS PLAT APPROVED FOR RECORDING IN A REGULAR MEETING BY BOARD { �� OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA THIS ____ DAY"' 41 OF-tepML0t, =_ 2013 A D PROVIDED 11-� T THE PLAT IS FILED IN THE t, 1,11 OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF CIRCUIT C U�f OFF' CO�LIER COUNTY FLORIDA ,- -k_ 1 �_ ATTEST DWI GH TA#tesphairman's signature only FILING RECORD G 0 G�'A A HILLER ESQ CHAIRWOMAN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY ME AND THAT IT COMPLIES IN FORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 177 FLORIDA STATUTES I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT 41D PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD ,AT r « OR P M ) THIS _ �____ DAY OF �Y 2013 AD t,Xy GENERAL NOTES AN ULY RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK _5 __ PAGE(S) _3 ___ THROUGH � 1 x -, _ _ INCLUSIVE OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA r 1 DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF 2 BEARINGS ARE ASSUMED AND BASED ON THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AIRPORT PULLING ROAD ------ - ---------------------- J o J r� BEING N 00 31 26 W DWIGHT E OCK u {' Q) CLERK OF TF CIRCUI URT IN 3 PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE AE 7 ON THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY AND FOR COLLIER COON Y FLORIDA �4 t � (F E M A ) FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (F I R M ) PANEL NUMBER 12021C 0394 H DATED MAY 16 2012 FLOOD INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE CONSULT LATEST FLOOD ZONE MAPS FOR SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE CURRENT FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION OWNER'S .� CKNOWLEDGMENT 5TA TE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER THE FOREG IN DEDICATION WA AC NO LED D BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF _ 2013 BY � ------ THEY ARE PERSONALLY KNOWNR HAVE PRODUCED______________ AS IDENTIFICATION A T�8,c_, PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT NAME OF A CKNOWLEDGER TYPED PRINTED OR STAMPED ,IitMiA ll�'IQ� NM«ty itwiit illlt M IIMi/� IAy C� N1in� INy ti 20ti Cssmnissisn /► FF 01*54 F• *W Wxt Assn 4 CROSS -ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL BE ASSIGNED AT SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND WILL BE PREPARED (SKETCH AND LEGAL) FOR RECORDING 5 THIS PROJECT WAS APPROVED IN THE MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD ORD 2013-47 ABBREVIATIONS R/W = RIGHT-OF-WAY P B = PLAT BOOK P 0 B = POINT OF BEGINNING P 0 C = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 0 = BENCH MARK FPK = FOUND PARKER KAYLON NAIL OR = OFFICIAL RECORDS PG = PAGE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FROM A BOUNDARY SURVEY PERFORMED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION AS PROVIDED IN CHAPTER 177 041 FLORIDA STATUTES AND THAT THIS PLA F COMPLIES WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 177 PART 1 AS AMENDED FLORIDA STATUTES IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED THAT ALL PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENTS WILL BE SET PRIOR TO RECORDING OF THIS PLAT AND THAT ALL LOT CORNERS WILL BE SET PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS RHODES 4c RHODES LAND SURVEYING INC �" ti Y U ( THOMAS E RHODES SR P S M NO 5E54 �7� r kr r ya� g-la- 13�r , �0 "°� DATED a � la"�SlStal3'� c. uC� • m THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY THOMAS E RHODES SR PSM #5E54 RHODES do RHODES LAND SURVEYING, INC 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE SUITE #107 3ONITA SPRINGS FL 34135 (239) 405-8166 FAX NO (239) 405-8163 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO LB 6897 0 15 30 60 120 GRAPHIC SCALE 14 i i CL w MERIDIAN VG LAE PI IAS E A SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN A PORTION OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA i I I 1 I I I I I ROCK REEK TERRACE I I I i I PLAT B OK 1, PIAGE 40 1 13 1 12 1 11 1 10 I 9 I 8 7 6 I i I I I 1 I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I STEEVES AVENUE (60' M) -CL N01'09'40"W - - r-----------T--- 50.76- I I I I W z I 1 C) I 00 col 00 r) L II J� o o U� 1 ROCK CREEK T_ERR_AdE I 1FL-AT- 900K 1, PAGE-140 22 23 I 24 I 25 1 26 1 21 N 01'09'40" W z 129.40' � w m w 1 ROCK CREEK TERRACE PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 40 SIR AT 2' OFFSET 0 N 00 C I I 0 m I N01'09'40"W IN01'09'40" W 203.04' 50 76' y HITI 0 O,-, 00 co ►�` H c r W TRACT 1 tr1 o y 0 v ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT O.R. 1680 PG. 774 15' ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT O.R. 1517 PG. 2094 r15' L3 S 00'31'26" E 434.46 FPK&DISC LB 43 i� 00 co v 0 N x m 0 co 0 '- x . ws..... d �Fs�Y as I Flu D O D �u� w � o 0 00 C 9 —1 0 2 Ut Zz cf) — v-z D -u m0 cn P.O.B. AIRPORT PULLING ROAD C.R. 31 (100' RIGHT-OF-WAY) 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PART OF THAT LAND DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY RESOLUTION 90-116 AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 1511, PAGE 1754 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 89'38'10"WEST 13.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF AIRPORT ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 00'31'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 878.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 00'31'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 434.46 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ESTEY AVE, A (60 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY); THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY SOUTH 8937'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 340.07 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 764, PAGE 757, THE FOLLOWING SEVEN (7) COURSES AND DISTANCES; 1)THENCE NORTH 01'09'40" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 129.40 FEET; 2)THENCE NORTH 88'50'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; 3)THENCE NORTH 01'09'40" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.76 FEET; 4)THENCE SOUTH 88'50'20" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 135.00 FEET; 5)THENCE NORTH 01'09'40" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.76 FEET; 6)THENCE NORTH 88'50'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 135.00 FEET; 7)THENCE NORTH 01'09'40" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 203.04 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT, NORTH 89'37'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 304.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN. CONTAINING 3.29 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 20.00 S8936'49"W L2 28.25 N44'3254"E L3 20.00 S00'31'02"E LEGEND � = INDICATES SET PK NAIL AND DISC LB 6897 • = INDICATES SET 5/8" IRON ROD AND PRIM CAP LB 6897 ■ = INDICATES FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT NO ID BASIS OF BEARING S 00'31'26" E 878.00' SHEET 2 OF 2 w �co 6 '-9 0 00 �o LE — P.O.C. EAST 1 /4 CORNER SECTION 2, T-50-S, R-25-E A THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY: THOMAS E. RHODES, SR., PSM #5854 RHODES & RHODES LAND SURVEYING, INC. 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE, SUITE #107 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 (239) 405-8166 FAX NO. (239) 405-8163 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB 6897 INSTR 5799416 OR 5702 PG 3222 RECORDED 12/5/2019 3:26 PM PAGES 4 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $8,750.00 REC $35.50 CONS $1,250,000.00 This instrument prepared by and after recording, return to: Leo J. Salvatori, Esq. Salvatori Law Office, PLLC 5150 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 304 Naples, FL 34103-2823 WARRANTY DEED THIS WARRANTY DEED, made this 41h of December, 2019, between ROCK CREEK HOLDINGS, LLC, a Florida limitedU ' bili try, whose post office address is 2670 Horseshoe Drive N., Suite 201, � la ' "Grantor"), and PORCHA LAND HOLDINGS, LLC, a Florida .1 'liability compatr )�e post office address is 1250 Airport Road South, Naples, Flori a 4104 ("Grantee' WITNESSETH that Ghntor, for an an cnsidei tion of the sum of TEN AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($10.00), and other good anda)tia$l, ci�st�aton to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt whereof l ere y ac vl�d ed lids car ted, bargained and sold to Grantee, and Grantee's heirs% sale, lying and being in Collier County Florida, to wit:„ k See Exhibit "A" attache4 ereto and incorporate&here n y virtue of this reference. Subject to restrictions, coveir is r watt to easements of record, and real estate taxes for the year 2020 anci'hall .b�eq�u iiyears; and Further subject to those items set forth on Exhibit `B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by virtue of this reference. Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Warranty Deed Page 1 Prolaw:266050 2 OR 5702 PG 3223 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above writt in the [5o. Signature L EO SALVATORI Witn 1 Pri ed e Witness No. 2 Signature K UT ACKWELL ROCK CREEK GS, LLC, a F� t b' ity Member DEBRA x Witness No. 2 Printed Namep' STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrume4t vasj, act nkl 2019, by MICHAEL H. "' ' M , asp° r LLC, a Florida limited liabil ti pany, who is 'r � tart' Pu as Manager- rc/ s J day of December, �CK CREEK HOLDINGS, me. DEBRA K BLACKWELL W COMMISSION # GG 117398 EXPIRES: August 26, 2021 PRINTED OR STAMPED NAME OF NOTARY My Commission Expires: Warranty Deed Page 2 EXECUTION DRAFT OR 5702 PG 3224 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tract 1, Meridian Village Phase 1, a subdivision according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 54, Page 38, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Warranty Deed Page 3 Prolaw:266050 2 *** OR 5702 PG 3225 *** EXHIBIT "B" PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS 1. Real estate taxes for the year 2020 and all subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. 2. Subject to easements and other matters as shown on the recorded plat of Meridian Village Phase 1, a subdivision according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 54, Page 38, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 3. Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Easements for Meridian Village recorded in Official Records Book 5081, Page 3367, First Amendment to the ByLaws recorded in Official Records Book 5629, Page 2576, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, which provides for: (a) -Assessments. 4. Ordinance 10-28 recorded rttz.erafi°HRoril 4603, Page 2931, of the Public Records of Collier Count '4rida. 5. Notice of Environmental , e' ur ovrS a e� Wate Management Permit recorded in Official Records Bo, k 46.8.4, 1Pag �5 , heu,,P lic 'records of Collier County, Florida. x,A - e 6. Naples Municipal Af 6rt A� at �a d ward n i recorded in Official Records ' Book 4731, Page 168 , the Public Records 4"Collier Qqunty, Florida. 7. Recorded Notice of Eri tiri ental Resource Petrm4` recorded in Official Records Book 5032, Page 1474, of the ,ords of Colliernty, Florida. 8. Drainage Easement as recorded ltr' dJficctal!`Iiecbrds Book 5066, Page 435, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 9. Ingress, Egress, Utilities and Drainage Easement as recorded in Official Records Book 5081, Page 2633, Official Records Book 5083, Page 3138, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 10. Sidewalk Easement as recorded in Official Records Book 5339, Page 1216, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Warranty Deed Page 4 Prolaw:266050 2 MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 1 SHEET 1 OF 2 DEDICA TIONS 5TA TE OF FL ORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT ROCK CREEK HOLDINGS LLC THE OWNER OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED HEREON HAVE CAUSED THIS PLAT OF MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 1 TO BE MADE A DEDICA TE TO COLLIER COUNTY I ROAD RIGHT -OF- WA Y EASEMENTS AS RECORDED IN 0 R 1680 PG 774 AND 0 R 1517 PG 2094 AS DEPICTED WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE UN ER,SIGN D OWNER HAS CAUSED THESE PRESENTS TO BE SIGNED THIS 1L DA Y OF� �lwW /2013 A D Wl7N E ----------- ------ NA TORE -J4 PRINTLy— SIGNA TUBE --- PRINT NAME ROCK REEK DIN LLC BY _ — —------ -------- MICHAE METCALF MANAGER A SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN A PORTION OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 0 D < 2 NAPLES FTI ROAD N( RCE C C 6 C N ROAD OD OOLTER 3Ei� 4 - �' AIRPORT o m� �, 35 ��SALVATIC AIRPORT _ ,� R N1 � PULLING � C R 31) m '- cn PROGE�CONIME�CENTER N5-, COUNTYRADIO SQUARE TER 12 SITE o LIVINGSTO 0 KINGS LAhE FO�CFIRE oD o N1APLE1� 0 VICINITY MAP N T S NOTICE THIS PLAT AS RECORDED IN ITS GRAPHIC FORM, IS THE OFFICIAL DEPICTION OF THE SUBDIVIDED LANDS DESCRIBED HEREIN AND WILL IN NO CIRCUMSTANCES BE SUPPLANTED IN AUTHORITY BY ANY OTHER GRAPHIC OR DIGITAL FORM OF THE PLAT THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE NOT RECORDED ON THIS PLAT THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY { ', L� i IV L_. , Vie, COUNTY APPROVALS ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS PLAT APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA THIS _1_2-t-- DAY OF SEM-CM S E V-- 2013 AD JKC MCKENNA P E IER COUNTY ENGINEER COUNTY SURVEYOR THIS PLAT REVIEWED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY SURVEYOR THIS _l9 DAY OF SE�7Elri/-4EiC _ 2013 A D MARCUS L BERMAN P S M #5086 COLLIER COUNTY SURVEYOR COUNTY ATTORNEY THIS PLAT APPROVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY THIS aL" DAY OF cS�i'Nr btr 2013 A D \ ... X {' E M I LY P EP I ---��----------- ,� C, j s I) 1 ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY I 11 COUNTY COMMISSION APPROVAL G ( A f THIS PLAT APPROVED FOR RECORDING IN A REGULAR MEETING BY BOARD { �� OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA THIS ____ DAY"' 41 OF-tepML0t, =_ 2013 A D PROVIDED 11-� T THE PLAT IS FILED IN THE t, 1,11 OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF CIRCUIT C U�f OFF' CO�LIER COUNTY FLORIDA ,- -k_ 1 �_ ATTEST DWI GH TA#tesphairman's signature only FILING RECORD G 0 G�'A A HILLER ESQ CHAIRWOMAN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY ME AND THAT IT COMPLIES IN FORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 177 FLORIDA STATUTES I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT 41D PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD ,AT r « OR P M ) THIS _ �____ DAY OF �Y 2013 AD t,Xy GENERAL NOTES AN ULY RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK _5 __ PAGE(S) _3 ___ THROUGH � 1 x -, _ _ INCLUSIVE OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA r 1 DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF 2 BEARINGS ARE ASSUMED AND BASED ON THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AIRPORT PULLING ROAD ------ - ---------------------- J o J r� BEING N 00 31 26 W DWIGHT E OCK u {' Q) CLERK OF TF CIRCUI URT IN 3 PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE AE 7 ON THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY AND FOR COLLIER COON Y FLORIDA �4 t � (F E M A ) FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (F I R M ) PANEL NUMBER 12021C 0394 H DATED MAY 16 2012 FLOOD INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE CONSULT LATEST FLOOD ZONE MAPS FOR SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE CURRENT FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION OWNER'S .� CKNOWLEDGMENT 5TA TE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER THE FOREG IN DEDICATION WA AC NO LED D BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF _ 2013 BY � ------ THEY ARE PERSONALLY KNOWNR HAVE PRODUCED______________ AS IDENTIFICATION A T�8,c_, PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT NAME OF A CKNOWLEDGER TYPED PRINTED OR STAMPED ,IitMiA ll�'IQ� NM«ty itwiit illlt M IIMi/� IAy C� N1in� INy ti 20ti Cssmnissisn /► FF 01*54 F• *W Wxt Assn 4 CROSS -ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL BE ASSIGNED AT SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND WILL BE PREPARED (SKETCH AND LEGAL) FOR RECORDING 5 THIS PROJECT WAS APPROVED IN THE MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD ORD 2013-47 ABBREVIATIONS R/W = RIGHT-OF-WAY P B = PLAT BOOK P 0 B = POINT OF BEGINNING P 0 C = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 0 = BENCH MARK FPK = FOUND PARKER KAYLON NAIL OR = OFFICIAL RECORDS PG = PAGE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FROM A BOUNDARY SURVEY PERFORMED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION AS PROVIDED IN CHAPTER 177 041 FLORIDA STATUTES AND THAT THIS PLA F COMPLIES WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 177 PART 1 AS AMENDED FLORIDA STATUTES IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED THAT ALL PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENTS WILL BE SET PRIOR TO RECORDING OF THIS PLAT AND THAT ALL LOT CORNERS WILL BE SET PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS RHODES 4c RHODES LAND SURVEYING INC �" ti Y U ( THOMAS E RHODES SR P S M NO 5E54 �7� r kr r ya� g-la- 13�r , �0 "°� DATED a � la"�SlStal3'� c. uC� • m THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY THOMAS E RHODES SR PSM #5E54 RHODES do RHODES LAND SURVEYING, INC 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE SUITE #107 3ONITA SPRINGS FL 34135 (239) 405-8166 FAX NO (239) 405-8163 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO LB 6897 E MRIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 1 SHEET 2 OF 2 0 15 30 60 120 GRAPHIC SCALE pla 14 1 13 I I I I I I L------1----�— ii- A SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN A PORTION OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA I I I I I I ROCK REEK TERRACE I I PLAT B OK 1 PIAGE 40 I I I 12 I 11 1 10 I 9 I n 7 i I I 1 I D I I I I I I I I I STEEVES AVENUE (60' R/W) -�- — — — — — — — — — -- i I I a I 1 ROCK CREEK T_ERRACIE I- PL-A T- 9OOK 1 F -A UP 40 21 I Iz N 01 09'40" W 129 40' a SIR AT 2 OFFSET o N 0 0 L3 FPK&DISC LB 43 ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT 0 R 1680 PG 774 a Go Ln 0 N O (4 0 0 N01 09'40"W 50 76' 09' a a 0 0 22 CA Ln O 0 TRACT 1 I I I I I I I I 23 1 24 1 25 1 26 1 1 1 ROCK CREEK TERRACE PLAT BOOK 1 PAGE 40 I I I I I N 01 09'40" W 203 04' 15 ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT 0 R 1517 PG 2094, S 00 31'26" E 43 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PART OF THAT LAND DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY RESOLUTION 90-116 AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 1511 PAGE 1754 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS COMMENCING AT THE EAST 1 /4 CORNER OF SECTION 2 TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA THENCE SOUTH E9 38 10 WEST 13 00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF AIRPORT ROAD THENCE SOUTH 00 31 26 EAST A DISTANCE OF 87800 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 00 31 26 EAST A DISTANCE OF 434 46 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ESTEY AVE A (60 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY) THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY SOUTH 893700 WEST A DISTANCE OF 34007 FEET THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOUNDARY LINE 6 AGREEMENT AS RECORDED IN OR BOOK 764 PAGE 757 THE FOLLOWING SEVEN (7) COURSES AND DISTANCES a cs v O N m CA 0 co 0 m 0 O m J rn U1 i Y 8 Ek an. Vo ` { Z,. t ns� A-11 C AIRPORT PULLING ROAD C R 31 (100' RIGHT-OF-WAY) 1)THENCE NORTH 01 09 40 2)THENCE NORTH 885020 3)THENCE NORTH 01 0940 4)THENCE SOUTH 885020 5)THENCE NORTH 01 0940 6)THENCE NORTH 885020 7)THENCE NORTH 01 09 40 WEST A DISTANCE OF 129 40 FEET EAST A DISTANCE OF 40 00 FEET WEST A DISTANCE OF 50 76 FEET WEST A DISTANCE OF 135 00 FEET WEST A DISTANCE OF 50 76 FEET EAST A DISTANCE OF 135 00 FEET WEST A DISTANCE OF 203 04 FEET THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT NORTH 89 37 02 EAST A DISTANCE OF 304 90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN CONTAINING 3 29 ACRES MORE OR LESS LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 2000 S89 36 49 W L2 2825 N44 32 54 E L3 2000 1 SOO 31 02 E LEGEND 0 = INDICATES SET PK NAIL AND DISC LB 6897 • = INDICATES SET 5/8 IRON ROD AND PRM CAP LB 6897 ■ = INDICATES FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT NO ID BASIS OF BEARING S 00 31 26 E E78 00 �a CA CO CD of 0 °f 0 POCr EAST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 2 T-50-S R-25-E THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY THOMAS E RHODES SR PSM #5854 RHODES do RHODES LAND SURVEYING, INC 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE SUITE #107 BONITA SPRINGS FL 34135 (239) 405-8166 FAX NO (239) 405-8163 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO LB 6897 Meridian Village MPUD Parcel No. 60090000021 N W 14 E S A► I s — � _ Q� TV Poiris ttla AVE lotI , SUBJECT — PROPERTY 16k ' &HIBISCUSAVEW 1 �r w sta'Ge•g pis) D, IGN a d 4he GIS User r mGradyMinor 170 85 0 170 Feet Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects )cu Jlgn tnvelope lu: t)tsCSZ)CyH-LtCb-4 CSHL-HZ)UL I UsbLUtN)ooL o EXHIBIT V.E.1 JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT For Meridian Village PUD (Estey Avenue & Airport Pulling Road, Collier County, Florida) December 13, 2019 Revised February 16, 2020 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Major Study) Review Fee=$1,500.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSP❑RTATI❑N ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLE5, FLORIDA 341 1 9 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION No. 27B30 (PROJECT No. 1 B 1 1 1 3) DocuSigned by: -,t�t,5 i�aun,�S , c79D23E47F... No 4386d ; _ r , STATEOf JAM M. SAI%S. �LA�" +0,0' DATE 1=L IDA REG. Nly!'J4138 ��J DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-1 D36268685C6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Conclusions 2 Scope of Project 2 Table A - Existing & Proposed Land Use 2 Figure 1 - Location Map 2.1 Project Generated Traffic 3 Table B - Net New Site -Generated Trips 3 Table 1 - Trip Generation Computations 3.1 Existing + Committed Road Network 4 Project Traffic Distribution 4 Area of Significant Impact 4 Figure 2A - Project Traffic Distribution 4.1 Table 2A - Area of Impact/Road Classification 4.2 2019 tbru 2023 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions 5 Table 2B - 2019 & 2023 Link Volumes 5.1 Table 2C - 2023 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 5.2 Appendix 6 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-lD36268685C6 Conclusions Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that the proposed zoning amendment to include an automobile dealership within the previously approved Meridian Village PUD will not have a significant or negative impact upon the surrounding road network. It was verified that all roadways, within the project's area of influence, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the traffic associated with the automobile dealership. As determined, the road network will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for the foreseeable future and the project will not create any off -site transportation deficiencies that need to be mitigated. Methodology On November 20, 2018, a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Methodology Report was submitted to the office of Collier County Transportation Planning Department. The $500.00 methodology meeting fee will be paid at the time of submitting the SDP application. A copy of the approved TIS methodology has been provided in the appendix (refer to pages MI thru M10). Scope of Project Meridian Village is an approved PUD that is partially developed with a 120-bed Assisted Living Facility (ALF). The property is located on the northwest corner of Estey Avenue and Airport Pulling Road, within Collier County, Florida. It is being proposed to amend the zoning to include an automobile dealership that will have up to 50,000 square feet of floor space. The PUD has one (1) right-in/out access on Airport -Pulling Road and one (1) full access on Estey Avenue. Table A Existing & Proposed Land Use Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Size Assisted Living Facility (ALF) 120 Beds (Constructed) Automobile Dealership/Sales 50,000 s.L 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-1 D36268685C6 I 1 0 l 1 I C I I a I I a Lon boat Drive 1 III y Clip er Wo Mercantile Avenue I IOutrigger Lane a o I E ;Schmann 64vd Progress a ue W Horseshoe Dr N. I I O d Domestic tv nue v I Horseshoe Dr S. 0 I in m Ente rise Ave Enterprise - nue o I L oI - E NORTH Ir o I No Airport Exchange Avenue E I N.T.S. C3 IPropspect Ave I a I Radio Road ° r---- ----------- Naples Airport I 0 6i ml _E .. v (n a- LEGEND 6—LANE ARTERIAL +� 4—LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR — �— -- — — 2—LANE ARTERIAL 2—LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD JWTR.n.NSPCRTATION ENGINEERING, INC. Estey Ave I Terrce Av 1f Dovis Boulevard — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I ` Glades Blvd �r I Harrison Rd v L o E 0 0 0 ` a L £ 0 N 0 O O N m 0 m a ` Meridian Village P U D Project Location FIGURE 1 December 12, 2019 Roadway Classification 2-1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-1D36268685C6 Project Generated Traffic Traffic that can be expected to be generated by the proposed hotel and retail/office space, as well as the existing ALF, was estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses was relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was concluded that land use code "Automobile Dealership/Sales" (LUC 840, SIC 5511 & 5599) was most appropriate in estimating the new trips and the existing trips. Table 1 depicts the computations performed in determining the total new trips. Table B provides a summary of the trip generation computation results that are shown in Table 1. Table B Site -Generated Trips (Summation of Table 1) Daily Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Existing Land Use Trips Generated Trips Generated Trips Generated (ADT) (v h v h ALF 312 23 31 120 Beds Daily Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Proposed Land Use New Trips New Trips New Trips ADT (v h) (v h Auto Dealership 1,403 94 112 PUD Totals 1,715 117 143 The report concludes that the project will generate more than 100 net new trip ends during the weekday highest peak hour. As such, the report investigates the traffic impacts associated with the project based upon the criteria set forth by the Collier County Government's Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines for developments generating "more than 100 trips", which is defined as a major study. DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-1 D36268685C6 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Meridian Village PUD EXISTING & PROPOSED LAND USES Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 254 Assisted Living Existing Use 120 Beds 840 Automobile Sales(New) 50,000 s.f. Land Use Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit LUC 254 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T = 2.60(X) = 312 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.19(X) - 23 vph 1518 vph 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) - T = 0.26(X) = 31 vph 12 / 19 vph 38% Enter/ 62% Exit = LUC 840 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T = 28.65(X) - 29.45 = 1,403 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 1.87 (X) = 94 vph 69 / 25 vph 73% Enter/ 27% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 1.80(X)+ 21.60 = 112 vph 45 / 67 vph Tota I New Trips 40% Enter/ 60% Exit = Daily Traffic (ADT) = AM Peak Hour (vph) = PM Peak Hour (vph) = 1,715 ADT 117 vph 84 J 33 vph 143 vph 57 / 86 vph 3.1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-1D36268685C6 Existing + Committed Road Network Figure 1 and Table 2A provide a detail of the surrounding E + C roadways. Table 2A also depicts the nearby roadways respective minimum level of service performance standards and capacity. Estey Avenue is a two-lane local/minor collector Road. Airport Pulling Road is classified as a six -lane arterial. The road functions as a primary north/south corridor that extends between its northern terminus at its intersection with lmmokalee Road and its southern terminus at its intersection at U.S. 41. Within proximity of the site, the posted speed limit of Airport -Pulling Road is 45 MPH. Estey Avenue @ Airport Pulling Road is a four-way intersection and is controlled by a traffic signal. Project Traffic Distribution The project's traffic was distributed to the surrounding roadway network based upon logical means of ingress/egress; current and future traffic patterns in the area and the location of residential areas. Figure 2A and Table 2A provide a detail of the traffic distributions based on a percentage of trips generated. Table 2A also depicts the traffic assignments to nearby links. Area of Significant Impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2A describe the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the projects area impact are shown in Table 2A. 4 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-1 D36268685C6 a I C ' I a I I I a I I Golden Gate Pkwy a Lon boat Drive ^� ___ 1 Cli er Wo Mercantile Avenue I 1 I Outrigger Lone a I a E��gct mann 84vd Progress a ue 0 I Horseshoe Dr N. I 0 a I mmo a 01 Domestic Av nue ' 1 I Horseshoe Dr S. a I N m Enter rise Ave Enterprise -9 nue a I oI — NORTH al NopI s Airport Exchange Avenue E I N.T.S. 0 l U 0) N Propspect Ave I 15% Radio Road 021 VL---- F=='--1-------- Naples Airport �I =stev Ave 0 w o ° a Terrce Av m �S `gl m E � o a `w c� a a � o C w 0 t N T a m LEGEND O�i PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT IJIMTRANSFORTATION ENOINEERINCs, INC. Meridian Village PUD December 13, 2019 I 1 I Davis Boulevard 2�► Glades Blvd O CV m Harrison Rd ro a 0 o a 3 w £ o a J c L 0 U y 0 PROJECT -GENERATED TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 2 Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) _ Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) _ 4.0 Airport Pulling Rd Golden Gate Pkwy to Radio 5.Oa Radio Rd to Estey Ave 5.Ob Estey Ave to Davis Blvd 6.0 Davis Blvd to U.S. 41 12.0 Davis Boulevard 13.0 69.0 Radio Road Tamiami Trail to Airport Rd Airport Rd to Lakewood Airport to Livingston 0 0 C) c Cn cn m m TABLE 2A 0 CD PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT m w W 00 00 D 86 Exiting N m 57 Entering 00 A W D N LOS Service Project Project o PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project N Road Sete. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significarwo Class LOS v( phpd) % Dist. y( phpd) Pk Dir (vph) DiR Standard Impact Impact 6D E 2800 25% 22 N 14 S 2% 0.77% NO 6D E 2800 40% 34 N 23 S 2% 1.23% 00 YES c> 6D E 2800 60% 52 S 34 N 2% 1.84% rn YES 6D E 2700 20% 17 S 11 N 2% 0.64% NO 6D E 2700 15.0% 13 W 9 E 2% 0.48% NO 4D D 2000 25.0% 22 E 14 W 2% 1.08% NO 4D D 1800 15% 13 E 9 W 3% 0.72% NO DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-1D36268685C6 2019 thru 2023 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions In order to establish 2019 thru 2023 project build -out traffic conditions, two forecasting methods were used. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour/peak direction factor and annual growth rate were obtained from the 2019 Collier County AUIR Report. Using the annual growth rate, the 2023 background traffic conditions were determined, which are depicted in Table 213. The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips (trip bank) identified in the 2019 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season, peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The 2023 vested trips 'Y' background traffic volumes are depicted in Table 2B. The greater of the two values produced by the two forecasting procedures was then considered to reflect the 2023 background traffic. The net new project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 2C provides a summary of the 2019 thru 2023 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity for project build -out conditions. As shown, all project impacted roadways will continue to operate at the County's adopted minimum level of service at project build -out. TABLE 2B 2019 & 2023 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2023 2023 Peak Hour 2019 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips (vphpd) DiR AUIR (vphpd) (vphpd) (vphpd) 5.Oa Airport Pulling Rd Radio Rd to Estey Ave 2010 N 2.00% 2176 11 2021 5.Ob Estey Ave to Davis Blvd 2010 N 2.00% 2176 11 2021 6.0 Davis Blvd to U.S. 41 1600 S 2.00% 1732 64 1664 12.0 Davis Boulevard Tamiami Trail to Airport Rd 1420 E 2.00% 1537 55 1475 13.0 Airport Rd to Lakewood 1330 E 2.00% 1440 0 1330 5.Oa Airport Pulling Rd 5.Ob 6.0 12.0 Davis Boulevard 13.0 0 0 C) c Cn cn m CD 0 TABLE 2C CD 2023 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMEXAPACITY ANALYSIS 2019 Peak Hour PK Direction v[ phpd) Radio Rd to Estey Ave 2010 Estey Ave to Davis Blvd 2010 Davis Bivd to U.S. 41 1600 Tamiasni Trail to Airport Rd 1420 Airport Rd to Lakewood 1330 2023 2023 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk LOS (vphpd) Dir LOS (vphpd) Dir (vph) Dir C 2176 N C 34 N 23 S C 2976 N C 52 S 34 N C 1732 S C 17 S 11 N C 1537 E C 13 VV 9 E C 1440 E C 22 E 14 VV m w W w 00 D 2023 2023 N 2023 m Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build-OiA Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Ho> PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction N PK Direct D I (vphpo) v h d vlc Ratio w LOS CD 2210 2800 0.79 C o 2210 2800 0.79 w C N 1749 2700 0.65 C rn «w n 1546 2700 0.57 C 1461 2000 0.73 C DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-1 D36268685C6 Appendix 1ocu5ign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-1 D36268685C6 JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPoRTA-riaN ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT METHODOLOGY REPORT For Meridian village PUD (Estey Avenue & Airport Pulling Road, Collier County, Florida) November 20, 2018 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500. 00 TIS (Major Study) Review Fee—$1,500.00 Prepared by: JARTRANSPoRTATIoiV ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 1 9 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO. 27830 (PROJECT No. 1 S 1 1 1 3) ►1'zo-Za1B JAMES ANKS, P.E. DATE FLORI Pmia, Na. 43S60 N 11 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-lD36268685C6 APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date:11-20-2018 Time: Location: Collier Co!Dty Government Offices(North Horseshoe Drive People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) James M. Banks, JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., 239-919-2767 2) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Government 3) 4) Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title: James M, Banks, P.E., President Organization: JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 4711 7th Avenue SW Naples_, Florida 34119 (239)-919- 2767 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer Collier County Transportation Division Applicant: Applicant's Name: Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: Meridian Villa e PUD Location: Northwest corner of Estey Avenue & Airport Pulling Road_ Land Use Type: ITE Code 4: LUC 254, LUC 310, and LUC 820 Proposed number of development units: Existing? is 120 Bed ALF_ Proposed is 125 room hotel and 40,000 s-£ of commercial._ Other: Description: Zoning: PUD Existing: Comprehensive plan recommendation: Requested: Findings of the Preliminary Study: See the attached C:lflse :Uames M. 8aokslOesklopWROJECT 11 CouierCwn:yV81113Meridlan VflageVsleh;odnlogyRepart.dot M2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-1D36268685C6 Study Tyne: Major Study Study Area: Boundaries: Based upon the County's 2%, 2% & 3% impact rule. See attached Additional intersections to be analyzed: None Horizon Year(s): 2021 Analysis Time Period(s): PM Peak Future Off -Site Developments: None Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 1Oth Edition (Table 1) Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: Pass -by trips: Retail — 20% Internal trips (PUD): Transmit use: Other: Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 2022 per Collier County's 5-year CIE. Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: See Attached Site -trip generation: See Table 1 Trip distribution method: Based upon manual assignment ,See Table 2A & Figure 2A Traffic assignment method - Traffic growth rate: Per Collier Coun Historical & Current AUIR Reports, but not less than 2% or background or vested trips method, whichever is greater. CAUsersUamesKBanks0osktopTR0JE0TSiCollierCountolOIII Vvlerdan WiageWethcdolagykepwtdac DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-1D36268685C6 Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Sight distance: Queuing: Access location & configuration: Traffic control: Signal system location & progression needs: On -site parking needs: Data Sources: Base maps: Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: Review process: Requirements: Miscellaneous: Small Scale Study —No Fee Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1500.00 X Includes 2 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each None All fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. Reviewers Applicant CAUsersWames M. 6anksWask1opV'R0JE T.%1 0o1liorCoon4l 01113 M than WiVelMslhodologgRepa doc Mq•- DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-1 D36268685C6 0 (L Longboat Drive Cli er Wa Mercantile Avenue Outrigger Lane a v o E}`Ischmann Sivd Progress us M 1 I Horseshoe Dr N. I a a o m Domestic Av nue > IHorseshoe Dr S. a 1 I Enter rise Ave Enterprise 4,, enue O NO2TH of No Airport Exchange Av nue E I N.T.S.0 U IPropspect Ave Vi aI Radio Road Naples Airport Estee Ave m a LEGEND 6—LANE ARTERIAL 4—LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR — — — — 2—LANE ARTERIAL 2-LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD ---•- IJMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. Meridian Village PUD November 20, 2018 I I — Davis Boulevard ri — — — — — --------------- I Glades Blvd I Harrison Rd m a E 0 a_ sn o ` p m D m a a m 0 0 a J Project Location & I Roadway Classification FIGURE 1 MS DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-1 D36268685C6 TABLE 1A TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Meridian PUD EXISTING & PROPOSED LAND USES Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 254 Assisted Living Existing Use 120 Beds 310 Hotel 125 Rooms 820 Shopping Center 40,000 s.f. Land Use Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips LUC 254 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T = 2.60(X) = 312 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.19(X) = 23 vph 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) - T = 026(X) = 31 vph 38% Enter/ 62% Exit = LUC 310 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 11.29(X)-426.97= 984 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.50(X)-5.34 = 57 vph 59% Enter/ 41% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.75(X)-26.02 = 68 vph 51% Enter/ 49% Exit = LUC 820 Daily Traffic (ADT) = Ln(T) = 0.68Ln(X)f5.57 = 3,224 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.5(X)+151.78= 172 vph 62% Enter/ 38% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.74Ln(X)f2.89 = 276 vph 48% Enter/ 52% Exit = 48% Enter/ 52% Exit = Pass -by Trips per 1TE= Ln(T) =-0.29Ln(X) + 5.00 = 30% 20% Pass -by Rate New Daily Traffic (ADT) = (ADT) x (% of New Trips) 2,579 ADT New AM Peak Hour (vph) = (AM) x (% of New Trips) 137 vph 62% Enter/ 38% Exit = New PM Peak Hour (vph) = (PM) x (% of New Trips) 221 vph 48% Enter/ 52% Exit = Tota I New Trips Daily Traffic (ADT) AM Peak Hour (vph) = PM Peak Hour (vph) = Trips Enter/Exit 14 / 8 vph 12 / 19 vph 34 / 23 vph 35 / 33 vph 107 / 65 vph 132 / 143 vph 85 / 52 vph 106 / 115 vph 3,564 ADT 195 vph 119 / 76 vph 288 vph 140 / 148 vph Irk 6 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E3B8B9A-2EB6-4BA2-A802-1 D36268685C6 i 1 0 a l I �I I a �I i I Golden Gate Pkwy Q0000 I Longboat Drive ^� Cli er Wo Mercantile Avenue IOutrigger Lane o E{ ischmann 81vd Progress a ue M Horseshoe ❑r N. I 0 _E 01 a Domestic XTv nue uy, Horseshoe Dr S. L o 1 I Enterprise Ave Enterprise nue -61 m NORTH al Na Airport Exchange Avenue I N.T.S. 0 U o � m I N Propspect Ave I '- — — — — 1�57. N Radio Rood — — — — Naples Airport Estey Ave f /n m l p Terrce Av m I1 5/ Davis Boulevard &2 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � I Glades [V Blvd 0 ♦1's o I 5S J v E a° Harrison Rd a) L 0 41 L a -aE CS O a ` a 1 0 o t t o CD w v w T O 0 UI N CL LEGEND Oi- Qom° _ PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT IJMBTRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. m 0 0 a N J Meridian Village PUD PROJECT -GENERATED FIGURE 2 g November 20, 2018 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION A -1 Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) = 4.0 Airport Pulling Rd Golden Gate Pkwyto Radio 5.Oa Radio Rd to Estey Ave 5.0b Estey Ave to Davis Blvd 6.0 Davis Blvd to U.S. 41 12.0 Davis Boulevard Tamiami Trail to Airport Rd 13.0 Airport Rd to Lakewood 69.0 Radio Road Airport to Livingston 0 0 0 C) c Cn cn m m TABLE 2A CD PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT m W W 00 co D 148 Exiting iv 140 Entering m co rn A W D N LOS Service Project Project o PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project N Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Nan-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significano Class LOS v h d % Dist. v( phpd) Pk Dir (vph) DiR Standard Impact Impact 6D E 2800 25% 37 N 35 S 2% 1.32% NO m 6D E 2800 40% 59 N 56 S 2% 2.11 % YES n 6D E 2800 60% 89 S 84 N 2% 3.17% YES 6D E 2700 20% 30 S 28 N 2% 1.10% NO 61) E 2700 15.0% 22 W 21 E 2% 0.82% NO 4D D 2000 25.0% 37 E 35 W 2% 1.85% NO 41) D 1800 15% 22 E 21 W 3% 1.23% NO TABLE 2B 2017 & 2021 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2021 2021 Peak Hour 2017 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips y! phpd) DiR AUIR y( phpd) y�1 v h d 5.Oa Airport Pulling Rd Radio Rd to Estey Ave 2100 N 2.00% 2273 17 2117 5.Ob Estey Ave to Davis Blvd 2100 Id 2.00% 2273 17 2117 6.0 Davis Blvd to U.S. 41 1610 S 2.00% 1743 10 1620 12.0 Davis Boulevard Tamiami Trail to Airport Rd 1550 E 2.00% 1678 33 1583 13.0 Airport Rd to Lakewood 1500 E 2.00% 1624 4 1504 5.0a Airport Pulling Rd Radio Rd to Estey Ave 5.Ob Estey Ave to Davis Blvd 6.0 Davis Blvd to U.S 41 12.0 Davis Boulevard Tamiami Trail to Airport Rd 13.0 Airport Rd to Lakewood 3 0 0 0 C) c Cn cn m CD TABLE 2C CD 2021 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMEXAPACITY ANALYSIS m w W w 00 D 2021 2021 2021 2021 N 2021 m 2017 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build-OuA Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjot Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hoi> PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pic Non-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Directi D (vphpd) LOS y{ phpd] Dir LOS v( phpd) Dir (kph) Dir vt phpd) (vphpd) vlc Ratio w LOS N 2100 D 2273 N D 59 N 56 S 2332 2800 0,83 D o 2100 D 2273 N D 89 S 84 N 2357 2800 0,34 w D N 1610 C 1743 S C 30 S 28 N 1772 2700 0.66 C rn «w 1550 C 1678 E C 22 W 21 E 1699 2700 0.63 C rn 1600 D 1624 E D 37 E 35 W 1661 2000 0.83 D FILED #43 ORDINANCE NO. 13- 47 '�'-- ' "11jNTY. FLORIDA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2010-28, THE 2013 JUL -8 AM III IDIAN VILLAGE MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT CLERK OF COURPYVELOPMENT, TO ALLOW AS PERMITTED USES A YOUTH LATER AND OTHER USES COMPARABLE TO THE PERMITTED USES IN THIS PUD. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE OY --- 1MRTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD AND ESTEY AVENUE IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 11.68f ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PUDA-PL20130000886) WHEREAS, on July 27, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 10-28 which established the Meridian Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning classification; and WHEREAS, Rock Creek Holdings, LLC represented by Tim Hancock, AICP of - - Davidson Engineering, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend --the l&ridian Village MPUD. - c N NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD 6F COWNTY 1 COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: Amendment to Exhibit A, Permitted Uses, of Ordinance N- �e"0-28, Meridian Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. Exhibit A, Permitted Uses: Tract A, to Ordinance Number 10-28 is hereby amended to add the following permitted principal uses: 5. Youth Centers. (8322) limited to the southerly half of the PUD as shown on the attached Master Concept Plan. 6. Any other principal use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). SECTION TWO: Amendment to Exhibit C, Master Concept Plan, of Ordinance Number 10-28, Meridian Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. Exhibit C, Master Concept Plan, to Ordinance Number 10-28 is hereby amended to show the area where Youth Centers may be placed, as shown on the attached Master Concept Plan. Meridian Village MPUD 1 of 3 PUDA-PL20130000886-REV 6/06/13 Rev. 6/06/13 Words stFUGk thFou are deleted; words underlined are added. �I SECTION THREE: Amendment to Transportation Section of Exhibit F, Development Commitments, of Ordinance Number 10-28, Meridian Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. The Transportation Section of Exhibit F, Development Commitments, to Ordinance Number 10-28 is hereby amended to read as follows: TRANSPORTATION: *********** 4. The maximum trip generation allowed by the proposed uses (both primary and ancillary) may not exceed the summarized PM Peak Hour, two way trips as shown below: a. For a maximum of 120 multi -family residential units (LUC 230), 70 PM Peak Hour, two way trips, or b. For a maximum of 480 units of group housing (LUC 254), 143 PM Peak Hour, two way trips, or c. For a maximum of 150 Adult day care (LUC 565), 114 PM Peak Hour, two way trips, or d. For a maximum 1,150 seat Church (LUC 560), approximately 70 PM Peak Hour two way trips (10% daily traffic), or e. For all uses in the aggregate 143 PM Peak Hour two way trips SECTION FOUR: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of ' Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day o , 2013. BO DWIG,14T.'E. BROCk,'.CLERK CO .t By: By: Deputy Cler Attest as toh�lmaan's signature only. App oved as to form and legal sufficiency: JA (I eidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County attorney Meridian Village MPUD 2 of 3 PUDA-PL20130000886-REV 6/06/13 Rev. 6/06/13 UNTY COMMISSIONERS NTY, FLORIDA GEORGIA A. HILLER, ESQ. Chairwoman This ordinance filed with the Secretary of Stote's Office the _?�day of ou(% ai�k— and acknowledgement of that filing received this & • day of 001 1 -A..) By ,owutyrk Words StFUGk-thMu are deleted; words underlined are added. Attachment: Exhibit C — Master Concept Plan (revises original Master Concept Plan to show limited area for Youth Center Use) CP\ 13-CPS-01220\ 19 Meridian Village MPUD 3 of 3 PUDA-PL20130000886-REV 6/06/13 Rev. 6/06/13 Words stFUsk tqFougM are deleted; words underlined are added. SFwMD ARUSMTIONAL WETLAND AREA ZONING: TTRVC LAND USE: MANUFACTURED HOUSING ZONING: RMF-6 LAND USE: MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL \7ONING: TTRVC LAND USE: MANUFACTURED \HOUSING I Tal ESTEY AVENUE cwr'.w.a auenwu� IV I I ZONING: PUD I LAND USE: IMPROVED INSTITUTIONALPROPERTY I L _ _ SOUNNWY I I II �`I I CLIENT: ROCK CREEK HOLDINGS, LLC 6435,LAEOER ROAD, SUITE 3 MAPLES. FL 34109 I I i I I IBFADRAPE AVENUEI � I I � I I rlNo MRS TO REMAW \ \ I I �FDEteETTNAVENIJE. \ p II I I I a. I � U, ion11, _* 11 o� \ I N�U I \\ INBIIBCUB STREET I \ I I I I I I 1 ESSTEY AVENUE 1 ZONING: C-5 I LAND USE: I IIMPROVED I COMMERCIAL I L---__j PLANNING NOTES: CURRENT ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: DEVELOPMENT TYPE/I.AND USE: BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM: MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO (ALF): MINIMUM FLOOR AREA: MINIMUM LOT AREA: MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: SEE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN PUD DOCL4vENT. MERIDIAN VILLAGE RPUD MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD COMMUNITY FACILITY OR RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED* 46 0.60 1.000 S.F. 3,000/10.000 S.F. 30780' SITE / LAND USE SUMMARY USE ACRES % OF SITE TRACT A: COMMUNITY FACILITY OR t 7.09 ACRES 60.70% RESIDENTIAL DEV. AREA LAKE t 1.25 ACRES 10.70% LANDSCAPE BUFFERS t 0.76 ACRES 6.51% ROW EASEMENTS/RESERVATIONS t 0.50 ACRES 4.28% TRACT B: UPLAND PRESERVE AREA t 1.87 ACRES 16.01% JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND t 0.21 ACRES 1.80% AREA TOTAL SITE AREA t 11.68 ACRES 100.00% \ GENERAL NOTES: \ ALL REQUIRED WATER MANAGEMENT AND OPEN SPACE AREAS SHALL BE FINALIZED PER LDC SECTION 10.02.13A1 DURING THE SDP REVIEW PROCESS. PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION [)ALM-DAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC. 3630 KRAFT ROAD, SUITE 301 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34106 PAVIQ$Q�AI PHONE (239) 4344060 FAX (239) 43442084 N. i N t I, G COMPANY D. NO.00009406 Exhibit C MASTER CONCEPT PLAN SHEET RFNOE-0OflBY OTHERS OF '. SE► 22. 200E 0"l STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2013-47 which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 25th day of June, 2013, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 1st day of July, 2013. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts an,dt:Cler_k Ex-officio to Bgtrd -of . County Commiss n�ffrs By: Martha Verga2r-d1 Deputy Clerk �� 0 �� ORDINANCE NO. 10-�$_ pp6 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41,AS, ED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT C=ff 6y't+ WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONI�{ & \�OE6Z8Z�Z9 REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLW COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZON-N ATLAS MAP OR MAPS; BY CHANGING THE ZON$N..d CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPER FROM THE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RP ZONING DISTRICT KNOWN AS MERIDIAN VILLAGE RPUD TON MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A MAXIMUM OF 120 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING OR TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY FACILITY USES INCLUDING ADULT CARE FACILITIES, CHURCHES AND UP TO 480 BEDS OF ADULT HOUSING INCLUDING ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES, CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY FACILITIES OR INDEPENDENT LIVING UNITS. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD AND ESTEY AVENUE, IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 11.68 ACRES; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 06-28; PROVIDING FOR TERMINATION OF STIPULATION NO. 5 TO RESOLUTION NO. 90-116; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. my nIM �7 0 WHEREAS, R. Bruce Anderson, Esquire of Roetzel and Andress, LPA and Tim Hancock, AICP of Davidson Engineering, Inc. representing Rock Creek Holdings, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the subject real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the subject real property located in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the RPUD Zoning District known as Meridian Village RPUD to the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning district Meridian Village MPUD / PUDZ-A-PL2009-2031 Revised 7/01/10 1 of 3 for a project that will be known as the Meridian Village MPUD to allow for development of community facility uses including adult care facilities, churches and up to 480 beds for adult housing which may include assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement community facilities or independent living units or to allow for the site to be developed as a 120-unit multi- family residential project with affordable housing in accordance with the Meridian Village MPUD attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "G" and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Ordinance No. 06-28, the Meridian Village RPUD is hereby repealed. SECTION THREE: Stipulation No. 5 of Resolution No. 90-116, which provides "The real estate located on the multi -family project will not be rezoned to commercial or industrial or any other non-residential use", is hereby terminated. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 1% day of t > 2010. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWFd'r6$ 4CK;.CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA h r, . Y By: u Clerk FRED W. COYLE, ClUrman Th� inii6&i Ved witEi W+ SSme��aary of te's Offi� tnd aolvpwledge Meridian Village MPUD / PUDZ-A-PL2009-2031 this Revised 7/01/10 2 of pf — Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: f0 eidi Ashton-Cicko ` Section Chief, Land Use/Transportation Attachments: Exhibit A — Permitted Uses Exhibit B — Development Standards Exhibit C — Master Concept Plan Exhibit D — Legal Description Exhibit E —Requested Deviations Exhibit F — Development Commitments Exhibit G — Part 77 Controlling Surfaces for Naples Airport CP\09-CPS-00993\74 Meridian Village MPUD / PUDZ-A-PL2009-2031 Revised 7/01/10 3 of 3 PERMITTED USES: TRACT A The Meridian Village MPUD is planned for up to 120 residential units or limited community facility (CF) uses including but not limited to assisted living facilities (ALF), continuing care retirement communities (CCRC) and independent living units for age 55 plus and senior housing. Community Facility (CF) The maximum size for the ALF and CCRC for age 55 plus and similar facilities shall not exceed a floor to area ratio (FAR) of .60 and 480 beds. For each 4 ALF beds constructed, one residential dwelling unit shall be subtracted from the maximum of 120 permitted residential units identified in the Residential section of this document. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following primary uses: A. Principal Uses 1. Assisted Living Facilities (ALF) as defined in the LDC and pursuant to §429 F.S., Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRC) and Independent Living Units (ILU) for age 55 plus pursuant to § 410.502 F.S. and ch. 58A-5 F.A.C; § 651 F.S. All ALF and CCRC uses shall be permitted at a combined maximum F.A.R. of 0.60. Nursing and Personal Care Facilities (8051, 8052) shall be consistent with operational characteristics stated on page 3 of this document. The maximum number of beds proposed is 480. 2. Adult Day Care Centers, (8322) limited to 150 adults requiring care. Family Care Facilities, Group Care Facilities (Category 1), as defined in the LDC and Nursing Homes, (8051, 8052) subject to LDC Section 5.05.04, excluding drug and alcohol treatment and rehabilitation facilities. 4. Churches & Places of Worship, (8661) not to exceed 1,150 seats. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following accessory uses to be utilized for the foregoing principal uses: B. Accessory Uses 1. Boat Ramps subject to Section 5.03.06 and the applicable review criteria set forth in Section 5.05.02, limited to provide access for small boats, kayaks and canoes only. No dockage shall be provided. 2. Customary accessory uses including, but not limited to, maintenance buildings, private garages, carports, clubhouse, indoor and outdoor recreational facilities and swimming pools with or without screened enclosures, unlighted playfields, playgrounds and similar facilities. 3. Lending Library (Group 8231), incidental to ALF and CCRC uses 4. Personal Services (7231, 7241), Dining, Private Restaurant/Lounge and all customary services incidental to ALF and CCRC uses 5. Guardhouses and Gatehouses C. Operational Characteristics for AFL units including CCRC and Independent Living Units for Persons Over Age 55: The developer, its successors or assigns, shall provide the following services and/or be subject to the following operational standards: 1. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older. 2. There shall be on -site dining for the residents. 3. Group transportation services shall be provided for residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents' individualized needs including but not limited to medical office visits. 4. There shall be an on -site manager/activities coordinator to assist residents with their individual needs. 5. A wellness center shall be provided on -site. Exercise and other fitness programs shall be provided for the residents. 6. Each unit shall be equipped to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency. 7. Each unit shall be designed so that a resident is able to age -in -place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted to lower the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted to add grab bars. ;•dr•ti�lsui';'MIN10 RC'riyri.l:IIIwl•7010 I'i.;lcl f; Residential (R) A residential development would be designed to accommodate a full range of residential multi family dwelling types, compatible recreational facilities, essential services and customary accessory uses. Should the site develop with residential units, no CF facilities will be constructed. A. Principal Uses The number of dwelling units proposed to be constructed is 120 units. The gross project density, therefore, will be a maximum of 10.27 units per acre. 1. Townhouse dwellings 2. Multi -family dwellings 3. Essential services 4. Water management facilities and related structures B. Temporary Uses 1. Model units 2. Project information and Sales centers 3. Construction administrative offices for the developer and authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses. 4. Sales and administrative offices for the developer, project management or managing development association, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses C. Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this District, including neighborhood community recreational facilities and property management and maintenance structures intended to serve the residents and guests of the proposed development. 2. Garages and carports. 3. Administration facilities intended to serve the residents and guests of the proposed development. 4. Swimming Pools, Tennis courts and other recreational facilities and buildings. ILin Vili.1"U NIPl)I) Rrvisvd:• July 1, 2010 5. Guardhouses and Gatehouses D. Development Standards Unless set forth in this Document, or as noted in Exhibit B (Table II), the following development standards shall apply to principal structures: 1. Setback from back of curb or edge of pavement of any road - twelve (12') feet except for guardhouses, gatehouses, signage, walls, access control structures and landscape features, which shall meet LDC requirements where applicable. 2. Sidewalks and bike paths may occur within County required buffers, however, the width of the required buffer shall be increased proportionately to the width of the paved surface of the sidewalk, bike path or cart path. Rc%:ised:lulyl.'.'U:0 PERMITTED USES: TRACT B Preservation 0 A. Permitted Uses Boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and boat ramps (limited to provide access for small boats, kayaks and canoes only. No dockage shall be provided) subject to Section 5.03.06 and the applicable review criteria set forth in Section 5.05.02 (elevated and at grade as long as any clearing required to facilitate these does not impact the minimum required vegetation). 2. Native preserves and wildlife sanctuaries. 3. Water management structures. 4. Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is compatible in nature with the foregoing uses, and which the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) determines to be compatible in the Preserve Area. Where Preserve areas are shown on the Master Concept Plan and the LDC requires landscape buffers, the preserve vegetation may contribute in part or in whole to the landscape buffer when it is demonstrated that the preserve vegetation meets or exceeds the buffer requirements of the LDC. Landscape buffers must remain exotic free while demonstrating sufficiency to achieve minimum buffer standards. I:��viti�•tl: �ulgl, Zi)I�) �'��. �:; nl I i EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Table I below sets forth the development standards for Community Facilities within the proposed Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. TABLE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CF M][NIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 Square Feet NIIN][MUM LOT WIDTH 80 feet MINIMUM FLOOR AREA OF 1,000 square feet BUILDINGS MAXHMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO 0.60 PUD PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 25 Feet FROMAIRPORT-PULLING ROAD MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK (FROM WEST BOUNDARY & SOUTH 50 Feet BOUNDARYEASTAND WEST OFSTEEVES AVENUE ONL 19 MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS Front: Principal Structure 25 feet Accessory Structure 10 feet Side: Principal Structure 25 feet Accessory Structure 10 feet Rear: Principal Structure 25 feet or %2 of the BH (whichever is greater) Accessory Structure 10 feet Internal Drives 15 feet from edge of drive aisle Minimum Distance Between Structures '/2 of the SBH (but no less than 15 feet) MAXIMUM HEIGHT Zoned: Principal Structure: 3-stories not to exceed 45 feet Accessory Structure: 20 feet Actual: Principal Structure: 57/75 Fee Accessory Structure: 27 feet PRESERVE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Principal Structures 25 feet Accessory Structures 10 feet IALF/CCRC/ILU and associated medical uses only excluding parking areas under buildings. ;dcriJi:ni'✓ill.i(;c A,II'lID R. i:;'d.fulyI,YOIU 111;eool 11 2Actual height for a permitted church steeple if developed shall be 75 feet. BH = Building Height (Zoned Height per the LDC) SBH = Sum of Building Heights Setback from a lake for all principal and accessory uses may be zero feet (0') provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into the design. Architectural bank treatments shall include any structural materials used to retain earth such as concrete stone or wood placed to LDC requirements. At rid!,in -MV01) I{Ily 1,;M 10 Table II below sets forth the development standards for Multi Family Residential land uses within the proposed Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. TABLE H RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TOWNHOUSE MULTI -FAMILY DWELLINGS MINIMUM LOT AREA 3,000 Square Feet N/A M][ IIMUM LOT WIDTH 30 Feet N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA OF BUILDINGS 1,200 Square Feet 1,000 Square Feet PUD PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 25 Feet 25 Feet FROM AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK (FROM WESTBOUNDARY & SOUTH 50Feet 50Feet BOUNDARYEASTAND WESTOF STEEVES AVENUE ONL19 MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS Front: Principal Structure 20 feet 20 feet Accessory Structure 20 feet 20 feet Side: Principal Structure 0 Feet or % of the BH '/2 of the SBH Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet Rear: Principal Structure 10 feet %2 of the BH Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between Structures Principal Structure /2 of the SBH % of the SBH Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet MAXIMUM HEIGHT Zoned: Principal Structure 3-stories not to 3-stories not to exceed 45 Feet exceed 45 Feet Accessory Structure 25 Feet 25 Feet Actual: Principal Structure 45 Feet 45 Feet Accessory Structure 25 Feet 25 Feet PRESERVE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Principal Structures 25 Feet 25 Feet Accessory Structures 10 Feet 10 Feet BH = Building Height (Zoned Height per the LDC) SBH = Sum of Building Heights Mcri;li:ui Vill;we MYUD r.-wised: July I, 2UtU ;r,i nl I Front yards shall be measured as follows: a. If the parcel is served by a public right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right of way line. Sidewalks shall be located in the right-of-way. b. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge -of -pavement (if not curbed). Setback from a lake for all principal and accessory uses may be zero feet (0') provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into the design. Architectural bank treatments shall include any structural materials used to retain earth such as concrete stone or wood placed to LDC requirements. Garages and carports shall be 10 feet from principal structures if detached. There will be a minimum of a 23 foot setback from the back of a sidewalk to front load garages. �L-�i�li.nt?'iil.lrr?AP!II? \ — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — —— \ I "ZONING: TTRVC �JI LAND USE MANUFACTURED 1 '\HOUSING 1 ZONING: TTRVC LAND USE MANUFACTURED HOUSING ZONING: RMF41 i LAND USE: MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ifi8 II _ II r PROPEHW e°uNOAnv II TAto LTf� A LAKE mTRACTA n------1 ZONING: PUD LANE) USE IMPROVED INSTITUTIONAL I II I I I! F aw I I I I suonve F.1 I I I � I I aw I I I \ O I I zom 19M se�spnsssst I \ \ I \ I \ ti I I I I esscr l r ONING: C USE I IMPROVED COMMERCIAL L----j PLANNING NOTES: CURRENT ZOMNG: PROPOSED ZONING: DEVELOPMENT TYPEAAND USE BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM: MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO (ALFk MINIMUM FLOOR AREA MINIMUM LOT AREA: MINIMUM LOTWIDTH: 'AEEpEVELppNg(i9iANMHpS IN PLL]pOCUNENi MERIDIAN VILLAGE RPM MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD COMMUNITY FACILITY OR RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED, 4S' 0.00 1,000 S.F. 3.00)/10,000&F. 30'/BO' SITE I LAND USE SUMMARY USE ACRES %OF SITE TRACT A: COMMUNITY FACILITY OR 17.09 ACRES 00.70% RESIDENTIAL DEV. AREA LAKE t 1.25 ACRES 10.70% LANDSCAPE BUFFERS t0.76 ACRES 8.51% ROW EASEMENTS/RESERVATIONS t0.50ACRES 428% TRACT B: UPLAND PRESERVE AREA t 1.87 ACRES 16.01% JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND t0.21 ACRES 1.B0% AREA TOTALSITEAREA t11.58ACRES 100.00% GENERAL NOTES: ALL REQUIRED WATER MANAGEMENT AND OPEN SPACE AREAS SHALL SE FINALIZED PER LDC SECTION 10.02.13AI DURING THE SOP REVIEW PROCESS. PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION w ROCK CREEK HOLDINGS, LLC � L- DgVIDSON ENGINEERING, INCH MERNTAN P7fllpE blP➢D REZONE s as �swsecnvro / �L.JY 3KRAFT ROAD, SUITE301 NAPLES, FLCPJDA34103 MA3TER OONGEPTPIAN 1 s� 3 DAVIDSON"'PHONE(Z39) 434-6080 FAX(239)43q.fi00q MPANY 10 NO 00M, EDIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION: COMMENCING AT THE EAST Y CORNER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 891 38' 10" WEST 13.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF AIRPORT ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 00' 31' 26" EAST 1312.46 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF ESTEY AVENUE AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89' 37' 00" WEST 340.07 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF ESTEY AVENUE; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 764, PAGE 757, THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) COURSES AND DISTANCES: 1) NORTH 01- 09' 40" WEST 129.40 FEET; 2) NORTH 88° 50' 20" EAST 40.00 FEET; 3) NORTH 010 9' 40" WEST 50.76 FEET; 4) SOUTH 88° 50' 20" WEST 135.00 FEET; 5) NORTH 01 ° 09' 40" WEST 50.76 FEET; 6) NORTH 88° 50' 20" EAST 135.00 FEET; 7) NORTH 01 ° 09' 40" WEST 203.04 FEET; 8) SOUTH 88° 50' 20" WEST 344.12 FEET, 9) NORTH 00° 43' 37" WEST 372.75 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE MEAN HIGH WATER ELEVATION 1.61 (NGVD 29): THENCE GENERALLY MEANDERING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LINE, 940 FEET MORE OR LESS: THENCE SOUTH 420 06' 50" EAST 46.56 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OFWAY LINE OF AIRPORT PULLING ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 000 3 P 26" EAST 1147.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD CONTAINING 11.68 ACRES MORE OR LESS R_vivrd: (uly I, 3U10 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC: A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.0 which establishes the minimum right-of-way widths to be utilized, to establish that all internal roadways shall be subject to a 50 foot right- of-way configuration. Mi i; ;::,u viii:u; rar ut� E3CRTBIT F DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS: AFFORDABLE -WORKFORCE -GAP HOUSING COMMITMENT AND RESTRICTIONS: Fifteen (15%) percent of the multi -family residential dwelling units (excluding CF uses) ultimately developed within the project, shall be sold by the developer to individuals, or families that earn less than eighty (80%) percent of the Collier County median family income. For the purposes of this MPUD, these specific units shall be described as "affordable -workforce housing units". Five (5%) percent of the dwelling units ultimately developed within the project, shall be sold by the developer to individuals or families that earn less than one -hundred fifty (150%) percent of the Collier County median family income. For the purposes of this MPUD, these specific units shall be described as "affordable -gap housing units". The median income of the area as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) shall be the then current median income for the Naples Metropolitan Statistical Area, established periodically by HUD and published in the Federal Register, as adjusted for family size, in accordance with any adjustments that are authorized by HUD or any successor agency. In the event that HUD ceases to publish an established median income as aforesaid, the developer and the County shall mutually agree to a reasonable and comparable method of computing adjustments in median income. The following limitations and performance standards shall be adhered to: 1. No affordable -workforce housing until in the development shall be sold by the developer to those whose household income has not been verified and certified to be less than eighty (80%) percent of the median family income for Collier County. Such verification and certification shall be the responsibility of the developer and shall be submitted to the County Manager, or his designee for approval. 2. No affordable -gap housing unit in the development shall be sold by the developer to those whose household income has not been verified and certified to be less than one -hundred filly (150%) percent of the median family income for Collier County. Such verification and certification shall be the responsibility of the developer and shall be submitted to the County Manager, or his designee for approval. 3. No affordable -workforce housing unit or affordable -gap housing unit is to be sold, shall be sold, or otherwise conveyed to a buyer whose household income has not been verified and certified in accordance with this MPUD Document. It is the intent of this MPUD to keep affordable housing as such; therefore, any person who buys from the developer an affordable -workforce housing unit or an affordable -gap housing unit must agree, in a lien instrument to be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, that if the affordable -workforce or affordable -gap housing unit is sold, (including the land and/or the unit) within 15 years after its original purchase price that he/she will pay to the County an amount equal to one-half of the sales price in excess of five percent increase per year. Such payment shall be maintained in a segregated fund, established by the County solely for affordable housing purposes and such money shall be used to encourage, provide for, or Nh.ridiml Uilhgt: N11,M) ;i.:;i:;i•i.l: lulyl. !010 V.i ;. 1] Vi C' promote affordable housing in Collier County. The lien instrument may be subordinated to a qualifying first mortgage. 4. No affordable -workforce housing unit or affordable -gap housing unit in any building or structure in the development shall be occupied by the developer, any person related to or affiliated with the developer, or resident manager. 5. When the developer advertises, sells, or maintains the affordable -workforce housing unit or the affordable -gap housing unit, it must advertise, sell and maintain the same in a nondiscriminatory manner and make available any relevant information to any person who is interested in purchasing such affordable-workface housing unit or affordable -gap housing unit. The developer agrees to be responsible for payment of any real estate commission and fees for the initial sale from the developer to the buyer. 6. The developer shall submit a yearly report to the County indicating the status of the affordable -workforce and affordable -gap housing units. 7. This Affordable -Workforce -Gap Housing commitment will allow Collier County Growth Management Division permitting to be completed on an expedited basis as provided by the appropriate Collier County ordinances and resolutions. 8. The dwelling units to be offered for sale to persons meeting the affordable workforce and affordable gap housing guidelines set forth herein shall be offered for sale to such qualified persons and to Collier County or its designee beginning with the date of issuance of the building permit for each building containing said dwelling units, and continuing for six (6) months after the Certificate of Occupancy for each building containing said dwelling units is issued, after which time any unsold unit may be sold at market rates. Four (4) months after a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a building containing affordable or gap housing, the County Manager or his designee shall be notified in writing by the owner that units remain available for purchase by Collier County. ENVIRONMENTAL Preserve Area Calculation: 8.33 acres (existing vegetation) x 25% = 2.08 acres to be preserved. TRANSPORTATION: 1. Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy, and if warrants dictate, the developer shall construct an additional eastbound left tam lane on Estey Avenue at its intersection with Airport Road. The length of the turn lane is to be determined by Collier County Transportation Staff up to a maximum distance that can be accommodated along the developer's frontage. The length will further be determined given consideration to the project's access location and normal transportation engineering practices. 2. Prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy, the developer shall construct a turnaround within the existing Steeves Avenue Right -of -Way as depicted on the MPUD Master Plan. .f";*idiau VilLtgv NIPUD The developer shall be allowed to use the existing curb cut on Airport Road during the construction of Meridian Village MPUD. Once construction of the development is completed, the developer shall convert the existing curb cut into a traffic controlled right in - right out access point. 4. The maximum trip generation allowed by the proposed uses (both primary and ancillary) may not exceed the summarized PM Peak Hour, two way trips as shown below: a. For a maximum of 120 multi -family residential units (LUC 230),70 PM Peak Hour, two way trips. b. For a maximum of 480 units of group housing (LUC 254), 143 PM Peak Hour, two way trips. c. For a maximum of 150 Adult day care (LUC 565), 114 PM Peak Hour, two way trips. d. For a maximum 1,150 seat Church (LUC 560), approximately 70 PM Peak Hour two way trips (10% daily traffic). 5. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks, and interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer. Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. 6. Relative to permitted CF uses, for services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation as determined by Collier County Staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider as directed by Collier County staff, with staffing and locations(s) as directed by the Collier County Manager or his designee. PRO)M1 ffTY OF PROPERTY TO NAPLES AIRPORT: The developer shall provide the following to the Naples Airport Authority: An executed Aviation Easement and Release (first five pages), once the MPUD has been approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. A statement within the Project's Condominium or Association Documents that states the following: "The Naples Municipal Airport is located less than one mile to the Northwest of the Condominium, in close proximity to the community. Purchaser's can expect all the usual and common noises and disturbances created by, and incident to, the operation of the Airport". Purchasers shall acknowledge they have read the Condominium or Association Documents by signing a letter, which the developer shall send to the Naples Airport Authority. The Condominium or Homeowner's Association shall not have the right to remove this clause at any time from their documents. 3. Future SDP applications shall be forwarded to the Naples Airport Authority for review. 4. No Structures shall be placed inside the Runway Protection Zone, as labeled on the MPUD Master Plan. !:Irrid„in ViII. ;l lIPHD F.� .: is(•d: �u IV1, 2010 1'. 1: ; l ii Sri i Y Building Heights will comply with the Part 77 Controlling Surfaces for Naples Airport as shown on Exhibit G. LANDSCAPING: The landscape buffer on the west property line and the south property line that extends east and west of Steeves Avenue shall contain trees with a minimum height of 12 feet spaced no more than 25 feet on center. Existing trees that can be saved within the buffer shall remain if practicable and be counted as buffer trees as allowed in the LDC. Hedges in the enhanced buffer shall be a minimum of ten gallon plants five feet in height, three feet in spread and spaced a maximum four feet on center at planting. Mrridi iu Villm;c':IPI)I.) Revi:;cd: July l• 2O 10 PART 77 CONTROLLING SURFACES FOR NAPLES AIRPORT: PR PECT AV "t ESTIMATED BUILDING HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENTARE BASED' ON FAR PART 77 p:1 TRANSITIONAL SUR. CORPORA FACE) AND FAA TVOR SLOPE ANGLE RE- OUIREMENTS. A SPECIFIC SITE SURVEY AND f[C SPECIFIC BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATIONS rRADIO MUST BE PERFORMED IN THE DESIGN PHASECERTIFIED BY A P.E. IN ACCORDANCE INITH APPROPRIATE FEDERAL AVIATION REGULA- TIONS, AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE NAA PRIOR TO DESIGN COMPLETION RD C.R. 856 17) /, t` LO IAINE AV y WESTVIEW DR / GAIL BLVD I� a f; AZEL o G o NORT car SEA RAPE AV IR. j EARL ST a LOTUS,. 4 CREEK: w OINSE IA AV o a C GUAVA DR z jR RD Q ¢ ' `w ' .' HIBISC ST a ` . '� Pl ESTEY AV ONUT CIR. F' J ESTEY AV o Q N w; Z Q Z LV J d Y m 'NTERRACE AV DAVIS BLVD R 84 DAVIS BLV EXTENSION -� LONNECTICUT A F- 4 L Iniwnna av Meridian Village MPU Revised: JUlyl, 2010 Page 17 of 17 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: 2010-28 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 27th day of July, 2010, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 30th day of July, 2010. DWIGHT E. BROCK' Clerk of Court`$hai}C erk, .ti ti .; Ex- officio to: Ho4.d of , County Commiss'ori`s.: ••- T•1V Q��Vv J4 � .'Y dryly By: Ann Jennejohn;":.. Deputy Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE Petitions PL20190002496 Meridian Village Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002494, Meridian Village MPUD I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. Sharon bfrn n our as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. State of Florida County of Lee The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this July 6, 2020 by Sharon Um enhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates P.A., who is personally known to me. �%,- C,2-A', {Signature of N tary Public} Carin J. Dwyer _ Printed Name of Notary !?`+ CARIN J. DWYER *. w oommISS10N # Go 982367 !' EXPIRES: May 14; 2024 Bonded Thru Notary Public Undeda. GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20190002496, Meridian Village Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002494, Meridian Village MPUD A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Porcha Land Holdings LLC (Applicant) will be held on Wednesday, July 22, 2020, 5:30 pm at The Salvation Army Church, 3170 Estey Ave, Naples FL 34104 (attendees are required to wear masks). Porcha Land Holdings LLC has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Small -Scale Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Amendment. The GMP amendment proposes to establish the Meridian Village Mixed Use Subdistrict, which will be located within the Meridian Village MPUD. The subject property has been platted as Tract 1 in Plat Book 54, Pages 38 & 39. The new subdistrict will provide for a new or used luxury vehicle dealership, in addition to a variety of residential and community facility land uses that are currently permitted within the Meridian Village MPUD. The companion MPUD amendment proposes to amend the Meridian Village MPUD to add the use for the luxury vehicle dealership, specific development standards for the commercial land use and identify the mixed -use area on the conceptual PUD Master Plan. This use is in addition to other non-residential uses currently permitted in the PUD. The subject property (Meridian Village) is comprised of approximately 3.29+/- acres, located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Airport -Pulling Road and Estey Avenue in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. If you are unable to attend the meeting or have questions or comments, please contact Sharon Umpenhour at Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, sumpenhour(�i_)gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA. Petition: PL20190002494, PL20190002496 I Buffer: 500' 1 Date: 3/5/2020 1 Site Location: Meridian Village PUD 9119841 CANADA INC 345 BARTON ST 989 AIRPORT LLC 4241 CORPORATE SO 989 AIRPORT LLC 4241 CORPORATE SO ALEXIAN ENTERPRISES LLC 255 13TH AVE S STE 202 BACKODE, MOLLIE JOY ROBERT EDWARD BACKODE JR 1040 OAK FOREST DR BARTLEY, DAVID 710 TIGER TAIL COURT BAUSER, BRADLEY CHARLES GAIL BETH BAUSER ULRICH CHARLES BAUSER BCI OF NAPLES LLC 2325 GORDON DR BCI OF NAPLES LLC 2325 GORDON DR BERTRON, THOMAS J 3535 AVION WOODS CT UNIT 601 BLACKMER, RONALD & VICTORIA 7 CEDAR CT BOMER, STEPHEN R & NANCY E 1089 STEEVES AVE BROWN, MICHAEL NESIUS JANET FAY BROWN 6970 DRISKELL CIR BRUCE, JOHN L 3505 AVION WOODS CT BRYAN, KENNETH LORNA BRYAN 1184 STEEVES AVE BRYAN, ROBERT R & DOROTHY 213 PRICE ST BRYAN, ROBERT R & DOROTHY P217 PRICE ST BURKHOLDER, LEANN R 3525 AVION WOODS CT UNIT 701 CASA HOMES ASSOCIATES PO BOX 7343 CHAGLLA, JACQUELINE 8183 MATANZAS RD CIRCLE K STORES INC REAL ESTATE DEPT 3802 CORPOREX PARK DR #200 CITY OF NAPLES AIRPORT ATHR1160 AVIATION DR N COLLIER CNN C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEME 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 COLLIER CNN C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEME 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 COLLIER COUNTY % BOARD OF CNN COMMISSION 3299 E TAMIAMI TRAIL COMMERCIAL PRODUCTIONS LL(4001 SANTA BARBARA BLVD # 327 CPF LIVING COMMUNITIES II BEACH HOUSE LLC 980 N MICHIGAN AVE CULTRA TR, DONNA M DONNA M CULTRA P/R TRUST UTD 12/09/10 CUNARD, RICHARD J & LINDA K 3401 HIBISCUS AVE CUSTARD, GARY 3333 HIBISCUS AVE DOREUS, LUCIENNE 3400 HIBISCUS AVE ERICKSON, REBECCA 1015 OAK FOREST DR ESTEY 3024 TRUST % MARC L. SHAPIRO AS TRUSTEE 720 GOODLETTE RD N #304 FAIR N SQUARE DEALS LLC 2844 ARBUTUS ST FARMER, TERESA 1042 OAK FOREST DR #6 FAYARD JR, AUD 106 CAMERON DR FAYARD JR, AUD F 106 CAMERON DR FAYARD JR, AUD F 106 CAMERON DR FAYARD JR, AUD F 106 CAMERON DR FAYARD JR, AUD F 106 CAMERON DR FLETCHER, MARGARET 6721 LIVINGSTON WOODS LN FORD TR EST, LELAND 1565 DOLPHIN LN FRASER, VICKI JOAN 1035 OAK FOREST DR GALICIA, MOISES 3312 POINSETTIA AVE GAMAGE, HIMALA O U 1022 OAK FOREST DR GARDNER, ANTHONY JOSEPH 3386 POINSETTIA AVE GILLS TRADING CO INC 933 AIRPORT PULLING RD S GILL'S TRADING INC 933 AIRPORT PULLING RD N GUCCIARDO, ANTHONY M 198 FORTS FERRY RD HELEN L DARBY LIV TRUST 5145 COBBLESTONE DRIVE HEYRMAN, JOHN ROBERT W29714931 KINGSWAY HINER, DAVID C & LINDA J 1033 OAK FOREST DR HUMPHRIES, KENNETH & WANDA 1150 STEEVES AVE IBCFLP INC 10091 HIDDEN PINES LN JANSS TR, MARILYN L MARILYN L JANSS REV TRUST T/A/D 6/23/94 KALMIA COMPANY INC PO BOX 809 KEARNEY, RICHARD P PO BOX 809 KEGLEY, ROBERT EDWARD 3505 AVION WOODS COURT #901 KEITH ALEXANDER INVESTMENTS54011TH CIR KENT, OLIVER G LYNDA KENT 160 BRIARCLIFF LN KIRK N SANDERS REV TRUST PO BOX 2481 KRANZ, JACKI DIXIE KRANZ PO BOX 336 KUMAR, ALAGU VIJAY % BLUEFISH MGT LLC 9990 COCONUT RD LA GUERRE, SIDONIE & JEAN R 3352 POINSETTIA AVE LUEDTKE, MARY A 6947 MADRID DR LUEDTKE, MARY A 6947 MADRID DR LYNN, JOHN & PATRICIA G 1343 CHURCHILL CIR APT 204 MALLIS, GEORGE 1161 STEEVES AVE MCCAUSLAND, FRANCINE 1002 OAK FOREST DR MCCAUSLAND, FRANCINE 1002 OAK FOREST DR MCGUIRK, CAROL A 3540 AVION WOODS CT UNIT 402 MCLAUGHLIN, GWENDOLYN 3555 AVION WOODS CT UNIT 501 MERIDIAN VILLAGE PROPERY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 2670 HORSESHOE DR N MEYER, JOHN W 1207 3RD ST S STE 4 MICHAEL P VALENTINE PROP LLC1200 SANDPIPER ST MICHAEL P VALENTINE PROP LLC1200 SANDPIPER ST MILLER & TERENCE M & DIANA B 1126 STEEVES AVE MORENO, PATRICIA A 3377 HIBISCUS AVE MRUDULA D PATEL REV TRUST 3815 RANYA DR NAPLES PRESCHOOL ACADEMY 112657 NEW BRITTANY BLVD NAPLES REALTY ADVISORS LLC % NAPLES MOTORSPORTS INC 1250 AIRPORT RD S NAPLES REALTY ADVISORS LLC % NAPLES MOTORSPORTS INC 1250 AIRPORT RD S NASAB, AMIREH H MOHAMMED SOUZANGAR ZADEH SHOUSHTARI NEADER, JOHN F DIANE M DUMAS 116 JESUP LN NEBUS FAMILY LIMITED PRTNRSI PHASE ONE LTD 3100 NORTH RD NEBUS FAMILY LIMITED PRTNRSI PHASE TWO LTD 3100 NORTH RD NEVRALA, JOSEF STANISLAVA NEVRALOVA LARCH 1100 STEEVES AVENUE NEWMANN, THOMAS S MARIVE KING NEWMAN 3555 AVION WOODS UNIT 504 NUNO, SALVADOR 300 SALEM AVE NW OAK FOREST HOMEOWNERS AS: % SENTRY MANAGEMENT INC 2180 WEST SR 434 SUITE 5000 OLAH, EDWARD M 3406 POINSETTIA AVE OPPENBERG, THOMAS &ANNET7IM SCHNECKENBANGERT 28 OSORIO, FRANCISCO TORRES 3383 ESTEY AVE PALOMBIZIO, TODD RICHARD ROBIN RAE PALOMBIZIO 3530 AVION WOODS CT #302 PARADISE COAST DEVELOPMEW 3400 PROSPECT AVE PARADISE COAST DEVELOPMEW 3400 PROSPECT AVE PARADISE COAST DEVELOPMEW 3400 PROSPECT AVE PLATT, BARBARA CHIONG YURISAN CHIONG MENDEZ 5048 28TH PLACE SW PORCHA LAND HOLDINGS LLC 1250 AIRPORT RD S QCSIF TWO LLC % IEQ MTG 300 DELAWARE AVE # 210 R A & M H ENRIGHT REV TRUST 12621 NEW BRITTANY BLVD REFERENCE ONLY AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM REFERENCE ONLY ESTEY AIR PLAZA ACONDOMINIUM RIDOUT, ROBERT J & DEBRA J 1026 OAK FOREST DR RITOTA JR, JOHN P & JUNE ELLEI THEODORE C=& LISA K RITOTA 3401 SOUTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY ROCK CREEK CAMPGROUND ACQUISITION LLC 3100 NORTH RD SAIZ, DARIEL 1995 HOLIDAY LN SALVATION ARMY, THE PO BOX 8209 SANCHEZ, GERARDO & JESSICA 3401 ESTEY AVE SBROCCO, CHRISTINA MARIE ALETA SBROCCO 1051 OAK FOREST DRIVE 1084 STEEVES AVE SUITE 1998 500 S TAFT ST 450 16TH AVE S STE 201 820 CENTRAL DR STONEY CREEK L8E 212 CANADA NAPLES, FL 34104-4754 NAPLES, FL 34104-4754 NAPLES, FL 34102--7246 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34109--0 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 NAPLES, FL 34102--0 NAPLES, FL 34102--0 NAPLES, FL 34104-4084 RUSSELL, PA 16345--0 NAPLES, FL 34104-4314 CUMMING, GA 30041--0 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 NAPLES, FL 34104-4314 NAPLES, FL 34113--8438 NAPLES, FL 34113--8438 NAPLES, FL 34104-4077 NAPLES, FL 34101--0 FT MYERS, FL 33967--0 TAMPA, FL 33619--0 NAPLES, FL 34104--3568 NAPLES, FL 34112--0 NAPLES, FL 34112--0 NAPLES, FL 34112--0 NAPLES, FL 34104--8808 CHICAGO, IL 60611---0 PAXTON, IL 60957---1632 NAPLES, FL 34104-4094 NAPLES, FL 34104-4009 NAPLES, FL 34104-4093 NAPLES, FL 34104-4804 NAPLES, FL 34102--0 NAPLES, FL 34112--0 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 GRETNA, LA 70056--7313 GRETNA, LA 70056---7313 GRETNA, LA 70056---7313 GRETNA, LA 70056--7313 GRETNA, LA 70056---7313 NAPLES, FL 34109---3833 --0 NAPLES, FL 34104-4812 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 NAPLES, FL 34104-4800 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 NAPLES, FL 34104--6108 NAPLES, FL 34104--6108 LATHAM, NY 12110---1234 COLUMBUS, OH 43220--0 WAUKESHA, WI 53188-- 0 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 NAPLES, FL 34104-4314 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135--7117 NAPLES, FL 34102--7446 NORWOOD, CO 81423--809 NORWOOD, CO 81423--809 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 NAPLES, FL 34103--0 NAPLES, FL 34113--8320 NAPLES, FL 34106--0 GOODLAND, FL 34140--0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135--0 NAPLES, FL 34104-4014 DEMOTTE, IN 46310--9411 DEMOTTE, IN 46310--9411 NAPLES, FL 34116--6684 NAPLES, FL 34104-4314 NAPLES, FL 34104-4803 NAPLES, FL 34104-4803 NAPLES, FL 34104-4087 NAPLES, FL 34104-4097 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 NAPLES, FL 34102--7232 NAPLES, FL 34102--2403 NAPLES, FL 34102--2403 NAPLES, FL 34104-4314 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 COMMERCE TWP, MI 48382---4471 FT MYERS, FL 33907--0 NAPLES, FL 34104-4355 NAPLES, FL 34104-4355 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 JUPITER, FL 33458--0 NAPLES, FL 34104-4807 NAPLES, FL 34104-4807 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 PORT CHARLOTTE, FL 33952--0 LONGWOOD, FL 32779--0 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 WACKERNHEIM 55263 GERMANY NAPLES, FL 34104-4068 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 NAPLES, FL 34116--0 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 WILMINGTON, DE 19801--0 FORT MYERS, FL 33907--0 NAPLES, FL 34104-4800 DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483--6617 NAPLES, FL 34110--0 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 NAPLES, FL 34101--8209 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 NAPLES, FL 34104--3327 Md 22716000401 AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 6350116000, NAPLES VILLAS BLK B W1/2 LOT 63500360001 NAPLES VILLAS BLK B LOT 1 OR 6183156000,N G+T C L F NO 225025 61830800001 NAPLES GROVE & TR CO LITTLE 2271600048; AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 7087044010! ROCK CREEK TERRACE BLK C LOT 2271600008, AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 2271600012: AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 2271600034: AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 22716000021 AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 7087068000, ROCK CREEK TERRACE BLK D LOTS 6183148000: NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE 2271600050! AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 7087032000! ROCK CREEK TERRACE BLK C LOT 7087024000, ROCK CREEK TERRACE BLK C S 70870280001 ROCK CREEK TERRACE BLK C N 2271600038! AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 6350112000; NAPLES VILLAS BLK B LOT 24 + 6350180000! NAPLES VILLAS BLK C LOT 25 6350120000: NAPLES VILLAS BLK C LOTS 1-6 2076468000! UNPLATTED LANDS N1/2 SEC 2 26430740001 COCONUT CREEK UNIT 1 THAT POR- 61843721001NG+T C L F NO 225025 6350004000; NAPLES VILLAS BLK A LOT 1 E 6350032000 NAPLES VILLA BLK A LOTS 7-11 60090000121 MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 2 22716000141 AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 6350168000! NAPLES VILLAS BLK C LOT 21 + 6350180010; NAPLES VILLAS BLK C LOT 26 6350210000! NAPLES VILLAS BLK D LOT 12 61831320001 NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE 22421360001 ARLINGTON TERRACE LOT 36 OR 63501320001 NAPLES VILLAS BLK C LOT 10 61830760001 NAPLES GROVE & TR CO LITTLE 6350008000, NAPLES VILLAS BLK A LOTS 1-3 6350052000NAPLES VILLAS BLK B W 75FT OF 6350056000: NAPLES VILLAS BLK B LOT 7 6350060000; NAPLES VILLAS BLK B LOT 8 6350048000: NAPLES VILLAS BLK B E 75FT OF 6350104000' NAPLES VILLAS BLK B LOTS 21 + 6184396200' N G& T C L F NO 2 1-50-25 61831441001 NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE 6350124000! NAPLES VILLAS BLK C LOT 7 + 6183092000' NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE 63501360001 NAPLES VILLAS BLK C LOT 11 OR 635OD400001 NAPLES VILLAS BLK B LOT 2 OR 63500440001 NAPLES VILLAS BLK B LOTS 3 + 2271600042, AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 6183120000! NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE 22716000281 AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 6183144000' NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE 7087036000 ROCK CREEK TERRACE BLK C LOT 70870880001 ROCK CREEK TERRACE BLK D E1/2 61831280001 NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE 6183056000! N G T L F 2 50 25 COMM NW CNR 61830680001 N G T L F 2 50 25 COMM NW CNR 22716000461 AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 6183060000, N G+ T C L F NO 2 2 50 25 6183088000: NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE 22420520001 ARLINGTON TERRACE LOT 14 63500680001 NAPLES VILLAS BLK B LOT 11 OR 2271600030' AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 6350128000 NAPLES VILLAS BLK C LOT 9 + 63502520001 NAPLES VILLAS BLK D LOT 23 6350256000' NAPLES VILLAS BLK D LOT 24 63502600001 NAPLES VILLAS BLK D E 70FT OF 7087080000, ROCK CREEK TERRACE BLK D LOT 6183072000 NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE 6183108000! NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE 2271600020, AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 2271600026; AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 6009000014, MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 2 6183112000, NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE 22421480001 ARLINGTON TERRACE LOT 39 70870840001 ROCK CREEK TERRACE BLK D W1/2 70870400001 ROCK CREEK TERRACE BLK C LOT 63501760001 NAPLES VILLAS BLK C LOT 24 22716000441 AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 31370000241 ESTEY AIR PLAZA A CONDOMINIUM 2595100002, CHANEL SUBDIVISDION LOT 1 25951000041 CHANEL SUBDIVISDION LOT 2 6350012000: NAPLES VILLAS BLK A E 125FT 2271600018' AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 0038676135' 2 50 25 FORMALLY DESCRIBED AS 5099004000 C W HUDDLESTONS LOTS 5 THRU 70870440001 ROCK CREEK TERRACE BLK C LOT 22716000321 AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 6183104000: NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE 61830640001 N G T L F 2 50 25 COMM NW CNR 635014000U NAPLES VILLAS BLK C LOTS 12 + 22716000361 AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 63502480001 NAPLES VILLAS BLK D LOT 22 2271600016! AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 6350020000, NAPLES VILLAS BLK A LOT 4 63500240001 NAPLES VILLAS BLK A LOT 5 63500280001 NAPLES VILLAS BLK A LOT 6 6350108000: NAPLES VILLAS BLK B W1/2 LOT 6009000002' MERIDIAN VILLAGE PHASE 1 7077004000: ROCK CREEK PINES UNIT 1 LOTS 2242144000 ARLINGTON TERRACE LOT 38 2643074010! COCONUT CREEK UNIT 1 61843760001 N G+ T C L F NO 2 1 50 25 6183100000' NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE 2271600052' AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM 003867600012 50 25 SLY 100FT OF W 120FT 7087064000; ROCK CREEK TERRACE BLK D LOT 61843680001 N G+ T C L F NO 2 2 50 25 63502440001 NAPLES VILLAS BLK D LOT 21 6183152000: NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE UNIT 702 25 AND ALL LOT 26 1990 PG 354 DES IN LOT 19 IDS 10 PG 530 FARMS UNREC'D LT 3 OAK FOREST UNIT 902 26 UNIT 104 UNIT 202 UNIT 601 UNIT 101 8,9+10 FARM UNREC'D LT 21 OAK FOREST UNIT 903 21 68FT OF LOTS 19 + 20 OR 1528 52FT OF LOT 19 + 20 OR 1528 UNIT 701 El/2 LOT 25 TWP 50 RNG 25 AND S1/2 SEC 35 TION OF LOT 15 DESC AS FOLL: BEG AT NE CNR LOT 35, BLK B, 125 FT OF LOT 1 OR 1988 TRACT 1 UNIT 301 El/2 OF LOT 22 OR 1237 PG 2030 FARMS UNREC'D LT 16 OAK FOREST 593 PG 1736 FARMS UNREC'D LT 2 OAK FOREST ALL LESS E 125 FT OR 843 PG LOTS 5 + 6 OR 1458 PG 1766 LOTS 5 + 6 OR 1458 PG 1766 E112 OF LOT 22 E 30FT OF N112 OF LOT 138 FARMS UNREC'D LT 20 OAK FOREST W1/2 OF LOT 8 FARMS UNREC'D LT 6 OAK FOREST 1293 PG 1753 1883 PG 2365 4 OR 1463 PG 2139 UNIT 801 FARMS UNREC'D LT 13 OAK FOREST UNIT 502 FARMS UNREC'D LT 19 OAK FOREST 23 & SLY .76FT OF LOT 24 OR OF LOTS 13 + 14 FARMS UNREC'D LT 15 OAK FOREST LOT 18, N 89 DEG E 180 FT, S LOT 18, N 89 DEG E 180 FT TO UNIT 901 BEG AT SE CNR OF LOT 18,N 200 FARMS UNREC'D LT 5 OAK FOREST 901 PG 1701 UNIT 503 El/2 OF LOT 8 LOT 25 12 FARMS UNREC'D LT 1 OAK FOREST FARMS UNREC'D LT 10 OAK FOREST UNIT 402 UNIT 501 TRACT 2 FARMS UNREC'D LT 11 OAK FOREST OF LOTS 13 + 14 24 LESS SLY .76FT OR 2075 PG UNIT 802 UNIT 2 OF LOT 2, LESS S 5FT UNIT 401 BLKS F,G AND H ROCK CREEK 15 AND VACATED CREEK AVENUE, 25 UNIT 504 FARMS UNREC'D LT 9 OAK FOREST LOT 18, N 89 DEG E 353.73 FT 13 OR 1742 PG 1698 UNIT 602 UNIT 302 22 + 23 OR 1374 PG 820 TRACT 1 1-3 AND W 15FT OF LOT 25, BLK THAT PORTION OF LOT 15 NKA THAT PORTION OF LOT 138 NKA FARMS UNREC'D LT 8 OAK FOREST UNIT 904 OF VACATED BILKS F & G ROCK 7+51/2 LOT BEG NE CNR LOT 35 BLK B, ROCK FARMS UNREC'D LT 22 OAK FOREST .49 AC VILLAS (HO) VILLAS (HO) PG 1065 PG 1065 TWP 49 RNG 25, LESS RAN, LESS BEG SW CNR OF LOT 15 THENCE ROCK CREEK PARK, N 641.50 W 12 PG 1472 VILLAS (HO) VILLAS (HO) 1273 VILLAS (HO) VILLAS (HO) VILLAS (HO) VILLAS (HO) 1953 PG 403 VILLAS (HO) 368.40 FT, S 89 DEG W 180 FT, POB, N 89 DEG E 173.73 FT, S FT, WILY 150FT, SLY 200FT, ELY VILLAS (HO) VILLAS (HO) VILLAS (HO) VILLAS (HO) 1091 TERRACE LESS SLY 100FT OF WILY VACATED RESOLUTION NO 94-470, VILLAS (HO) POB, N 89 DEG E 287.89 FT, S D, NAPLES VILLAS AVION WOODS CONDO AS DESC IN ESTEY AIR PLAZA CONDO AS DESC VILLAS (HO) CREEK TERRACE VACATED IN IDS 16 CREEK PK, N 641.50FT, W 252FT VILLAS (HO) LEASED PARCELS ALG E R/W LI N ODEG 29'W FT, S 641.50, E 12FT TO POB NLY TO COMM PT POB 641.22 FT, S 89 DEG W 353.73 150FT 120FT AND WESTERLY 35FT OF LOT 641.22 FT. S 89 DEG W 288.64 OR 3518 PG 2699 (PH 1), OR IN 4316 PG 1678 PG 288 TO POB, CONT W 295.32FT, S POList 500.x1s SCHOOL DISTRICT-WIT/LWH/ALT LORENZO WALKER INSTITUTE % SUPERINTENDENT 5775 OSCEOLA TRL NAPLES, FL 34109--919 6184400000N G +T C L F NO 2 1 50 25 LOTS 139 + 140, LESS S 330FT OF W 580FT, N112 OF LOTS 141 SCLAFANI, RICHARD J 3520 AVION WOODS CT UNIT 201 NAPLES, FL 34104-4069 22716000101 AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 201 SIGMOND, SCOTT H & STERLING 1046 OAK FOREST DR NAPLES, FL 34104-4811 61830840001 NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE FARMS UNREC'D LT 4 OAK FOREST VILLAS (HO) ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC 2001 AIRPORT RD SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34112--0 63501960001 NAPLES VILLA BLK D LOTS 4, 5, 6 AND 7 (F/K/A ROCK CREEK HARBOR PLAT) STATON II, RAYMOND W JONATHAN R STATON 3168 BARRETT AVE NAPLES, FL 34112--0 6350016000! NAPLES VILLAS BLK A E 125FT OF LOT 3 + S 5FT OF E 125FT OF LOT 2 STATON REVOCABLE TRUST RAYMOND W STATON II 2731 13TH ST N NAPLES, FL 34103--0 6350064000, NAPLES VILLAS BLK B LOTS 9 + 10 STEARNS TR, ROY G & SUSAN K ROY G STEARNS TRUST UTD O5/28/98 541 23RD ST SW NAPLES, FL 34117--3223 6184372210: N G + T C L F NO 2 2 50 25 COM AT NE CNR LOT 35, BLK B ROCK CREEK PARK, N 100FT, W 12FT N STEFAN, KEITH R 3510 AVION WOODS COURT#102 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 227160000C AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 102 STRYCHARZ, RYSZARD 480 LOGAN BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119--0 2242140000! ARLINGTON TERRACE LOT 37 THEGENUS, MOISE & EMMELINE 3386 HIBISCUS AVE NAPLES, FL 34104-4010 63502080= NAPLES VILLAS BLK D LOT 11 THOMPSON TR, BRALEY C CATHRYN R THOMPSON TR GRANDMASTER B REV TRUST CATHRYN R THOMPSON REV TRL 2152 LONGBOAT DR NAPLES, FL 34104--3377 61831160001 NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE FARMS UNREC'D LT 12 OAK FOREST VILLAS (HO) TOMASIC, DIANA D JOHN D TWADDLE 1037 OAK FOREST DR NAPLES, FL 34104-4812 61831360001 NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE FARMS UNREC'D LT 17 OAK FOREST VILLAS (HO) TOMASIC, MIHAJLO & DUSANKA 11000 W SPRAGUE RD PARMA, OH 44130---7712 61831400001 NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE FARMS UNREC'D LT 18 OAK FOREST VILLAS (HO) TRETTIS, MARILEE 2920 HAWTHORNE CT NAPLES, FL 34104-4311 22420480001 ARLINGTON TERRACE LOT 13 AND THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 11 AND 12 AS DESC IN OR 2765 PG 1868 UDRIZAR, MARCOS 1020 OAK FOREST DR NAPLES, FL 34104--0 61830960= NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE FARMS UNREC'D LT 7 OAK FOREST VILLAS (HO) VAHID REZAEI, KIANOUSH 3540 AVION WOODS CT #404 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 22716000241 AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 404 VALENTINE, MICHAEL P 1200 SANDPIPER ST NAPLES, FL 34102--2403 6184372200! N G & T C L F NO 2 2 50 25 W 25FT OF N 160FT OF LOT 137, LESS R/W VALERIA KEYES TRUST 2570 66TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34105--7308 63502000001 NAPLES VILLAS BLK D LOTS 8 -9 VILLEGAS, JORGE R & GUADALUF 3389 HIBISCUS AVE NAPLES, FL 34104-4009 6350172000, NAPLES VILLAS BLK C LOT 23 + W1/2 OF LOT 22 WALLACE, ELEANOR 3540 AVION WOODS CT UNIT403 NAPLES, FL 34104-4087 22716000221 AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 403 WELLS, BREANNE DENAE 3510 AVION WOODS CT #103 NAPLES, FL 34104--0 22716000061 AVION WOODS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 103 WELLS, TAYLOR C 1011 OAK FOREST DR NAPLES, FL 34104--4804 61831240001 NAPLES GROVE & TK CO LITTLE FARMS UNREC'D LT 14 OAK FOREST VILLAS (HO) WESTGLEN VILLAGE L L C C/O WELSH COMPANIES FL INC 2950 TAMIAMI TRL N #200 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 3137000026: ESTEY AIR PLAZA A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3 WESTGLEN VILLAGE L L C C/O WELSH COMPANIES FL INC 2950 TAMIAMI TRL N #200 NAPLES, FL 34103--0 31370000021 ESTEY AIR PLAZA A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1 WHITE, JACK & LAURIE 210 25TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34117---3232 2242056000' ARLINGTON TERRACE LOT 15 OR 490 PG 385 YAMA, SHARON 3374 HIBISCUS AVE NAPLES, FL 34104---0 63502040001 NAPLES VILLAS BLK D LOT 10 + 142, E 80FT OF S 330FT OF 334.15FT FOR POB, N 206.64FT, POList 500.x1s GradyMinor 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Oak Forest Villas Homeowners Association, Inc. 2180 Immokalee Road, #309 Naples, FL 34110 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20190002496 Meridian Village Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002494, Meridian Village MPUD A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Porcha Land Holdings LLC (Applicant) will be held on Wednesday, July 22, 2020, 5:30 pm at The Salvation Army Church, 3170 Estey Ave, Naples FL 34104 (attendees are required to wear masks). Porcha Land Holdings LLC has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Small -Scale Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Amendment. The GMP amendment proposes to establish the Meridian Village Mixed Use Subdistrict, which will be located within the Meridian Village MPUD. The subject property has been platted as Tract 1 in Plat Book 54, Pages 38 & 39. The new subdistrict will provide for a new or used luxury vehicle dealership, in addition to a variety of residential and community facility land uses that are currently permitted within the Meridian Village MPUD. The companion MPUD amendment proposes to amend the Meridian Village MPUD to add the use for the luxury vehicle dealership, specific development standards for the commercial land use and identify the mixed -use area on the conceptual PUD Master Plan. This use is in addition to other non-residential uses currently permitted in the PUD. The subject property (Meridian Village) is comprised of approximately 3.29+/- acres, located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Airport -Pulling Road and Estey Avenue in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. 1 NINE NINE IE : 9.3. 11 u =rM' IEIIII- 1`11I�-Non3 bill i31 — 5 UPI A I Illp:l■R■1u191 II■Eq■�■In■iltla■: EIEni .N .�reu�eu■ ■No �nuwiu -11 11 ,�u■uuu %atiMaV� '� _ice '■ 1 _ ELI's■��I � ■■ i 1 Ip I ■ • EII■='111111 � Idljnii r 1• �■ ■mEr■u■I��111� ■�IIIIIIIIA ■1 Ivu1n ■ en1111i11 � J YII If you are unable to attend the meeting or have questions or comments, please contact Sharon Umpenhour at 0. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, sumpenhour@ _gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. ND-GC10446191-01 Transcript PL20190001387 and PL20190001364 Meridian Village GMPA and PUDA July 22, 2020 NIM The meeting was scheduled for Wednesday, July 22, 2020, 5:30 pm at the Salvation Army Church Chapel, 3170 Estey Ave., Naples, FL 34104. No members of the public were present or participating remotely therefore the meeting was not held. Page 1 of 1 Petitions: PL20190002496., Meridian Village Small -Scale Plan Amendment and; PL20190002494., Meridian Village MPUD Amendment July 22.,2020 Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) GradyMinor Project Team • Porcha Land Holdings LLC - Applicant • Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., Land Use Attorney - Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. • D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 2 Location Map SUBJECT I I PROPERTY ►� Pstey AVE �- r • Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 3 Project Information Existing Future Land Use (FLU): Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict Proposed FLU: Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Meridian Village Mixed -Use Subdistrict FLU Acreage: Current Zoning: 3.29+/- acres Meridian Village MPUD Proposed Zoning: Meridian Village MPUD Overall PUD Acreage: 1 1.68+/- acres PUD Amendment Acreage: 3.29+/- acres Proposed Request • The GMP amendment proposes to establish the Meridian Village Mixed Use Subdistrict, which will be located within the Meridian Village MPUD. • The new subdistrict will provide for a new or used luxury vehicle dealership, in addition to a variety of residential and community facility land uses that are currently permitted within the Meridian Village MPUD. • The MPUD amendment proposes to amend the Meridian Village MPUD to add the use for the luxury vehicle dealership, specific development standards for the commercial land use and identify the mixed -use area on the conceptual PUD Master Plan. This use is in addition to other non-residential uses currently permitted in the PUD previously approved by Ordinance 2010-28 and as amended by Ordinance 2013-47. 5 Proposed Subdistrict Language 22. Meridian Village Mixed -Use Subdistrict [page 501 This Subdistrict consists of 3.29+/- acres and is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Airport Pulling Road and Estey Avenue and is further described as Tract I of the Meridian Village subdivision. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide a variety of commercial and community facility uses to serve the surrounding area. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the followina: a. Development is encouraaed to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). b. The maximum commercial square footage permitted within the Subdistrict is 50,000 square feet of floor area. c. Allowable commercial uses shall be limited to Luxury Automotive vehicle and equipment dealers (551 1 and 5599). Luxury Automotive dealer shall be any automobile dealership (551 1) that sells only new and used high -end luxury vehicles such as, but not limited to, Lamborghini, Ferrari, Masserati, Lotus, BMW, Alfa Romeo, Karma or Jaguar and the hours of operation may be less than a typical automobile dealership and inventory may be limited. d. Community facility are also allowed uses consistent with the previously approved Meridian Village MPUD including i. Assisted Living Facilities (ALF) as defined in the LDC and pursuant to §429 F.S., Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRC) and Independent Living Units (ILU) for age 55 plus pursuant to § 410.502 F.S. and ch. 58A-5 F.A.C; § 651 F.S. All ALF and CCRC uses shall be permitted at a combined maximum F.A.R. of 0.60. The maximum number of beds proposed is 480. ii. Adult Day Care Centers, (8322) limited to 150 adults reguirin_. care. iii. Family Care Facilities, Group Care Facilities (Category I), as defined in the LDC and Nursing Homes, (8051, 8052) subject to LDC Section 5.05.04, excluding drug and alcohol treatment and rehabilitation facilities. iv. Churches & Places of Worship, (8661) not to exceed 1,150 seats. v. Youth Centers, (8322), limited to the southerly half of the PUD 6 Approved Master Plan ------------------- � I ,ZONING: TTRVC LAND USE: MANUFACTURED .HOUSING 1 �cPE e G£b TRACT B JURI9OIC'IdVP1 wETuwo AREA .� �� '�i ZONING: TTRVC .. KE ®LA LAND USE: MANUFACTURED HOUSING I I ®TRACT A I I rcWN ��r I p J0, Ial _ I I'6'L_�—�_ ^ f �- I L 4 50 SIUC YARN ETBACK 00�3 �1, •—� II I 0 p f --- 5oscnPEN - BUFFER V F Eo$z - wl I E•�• � c rE ;;� 1 1I I ZONING: RMF-6 y m BUFFER N LAND USE: MULTI -FAMILY r '- RESIDENTIAL _ w Y V n �, � l UNrvECTIO fffff I CTION wI O� K „ v LA BN SC.A El� BEEPER LL I ZONING: PUD LAND USE: IMPROVED _ I I INSTITUTIONAL r , PROPERTY I' I I BOUNDARY I I L _,J CLIENT' REV, DATE. DESURIPTIO z a to ROCK CREEK HOLDINGS, LLC IB 5 5J EGER ROAD,SUITE3 .-IF..FL.— 8 4 IB PER MTG WTAPE fi f I I I I s SEAGPAPEAVENUEI I t l CIIN�CMRa I TORE— \ POINSETTIA 0.VENUEI � g w z � a ❑ Z IPJ 4U - � � welscussTaEEr i \ � Ln I I I I ESTEYAVENIIE — 1 71 PLANNING NOTES: CURRENT ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: DEVELOPMENT TYPEILAND USE: BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM: MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO (ALF): MINIMUM FLOOR AREA: MINIMUM LOT AREA: MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: `SEE DEVELOPMENT $TANDARDS IN FUD DOCUMENT. MERIDIAN VILLAGE RPUD MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD COMMUNITY FACILITY OR RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED' 45' 0.60 1,000 S.F. 3,000110,000 S-F. 30780• SITE 1 LAND USE SUMMARY USE ACRES % OF SITE TRACT A: COMMUNITY FACILITY OR t 7.09 ACRES 60.70% RESIDENTIAL DEV. AREA LAKE t 1.25 ACRES 10.70% LANDSCAPE BUFFERS 10.76 ACRES 6.51% ROW EASEMENTSIRESERVATIONS ±0.50ACRES 4.28% TRACT B: UPLAND PRESERVE AREA ± 1.87 ACRES 16.01 % J U RISDICTIONAL WETLAND ±0.21 ACRES 1.80% AREA TOTAL SITE AREA t 11.68 ACRES 100.DD% GENERAL NOTES: ALL REQUIRED WATER MANAGEMENT AND OPEN SPACE AREAS SHALL BE FINALIZED PER LDC SECTION 10.02.13.A.1 DURING THE SDP REVIEW PROCESS. ❑ � I ZONING: G-5 LAND USE', S I IMPROVED I II COMMERCIAL o .n erc �src dajRco Z Z 2 L — — — — PRELIM - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION BT D"IDSON ENGINEERING N INC. MERIDIAN VILLICEPTPPLA REZONP SREET MASTER GOGEWN 1 D� 3530 KRAFT ROAD, SUITE 301 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105 OAVIO50N PHONE (239) 434-8680 FAA (239)434-6884 II OF As sHowv - COMPANY ID. NO. 00009496 7 Proposed Master Plan — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — YONING: TTRVC 1 LAND USE: MANUFACTURED -HOUSING t R G K %'9 r'E / TRACT B S SF D JURIGDIC-IDNAL— WvIVNDAREA ZONING: TTRVC LAND USE: MANUFACTURED HOUSING ZONING:RMF-6o LAND USE: MULTI -FAMILY r 2 RESIDENTIAL rc U 9 1 � r , PROPERTY BOUNDARY CLIENT: Porcha Land Holdings, LLC 1250 Airport Road S Naples Florida 34104 'Y/ ® LAKE ®TRACT A I I I I I I I I d I q � I a TRACT C �I � I V I PROPOSED ? I , PEDE87RIAN � I , CONNECTION I i I WQ IE PE ®I ZONING: PUD 1 w LAND USE: IMPROVED O INSTITUTIONAL I I I I I ?z � I s SE GRAPEAVENUEI o� J Ekl NG CUpH c IDN..ulry I �PLINSMA AV WEI 0. E z zz \ _ I N \ HISISCVS STREET i \ \ � I I I I I II EBTEYAVENUE »d.I,II11CH,hI0*113 CURRENT ZONING: MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD PROPOSED ZONING: MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD DEVELOPMENT TYPE/LAND USE: COMMERCIAL, COMMUNITY FACILITY OR RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED` BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM: 45' (CFAND R) TRACT C (COMMERCIAL) 45' ZONED 15T ACTUAL MAXIMUM COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA: 50,000 S.F. MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO (ALF): 0.60 MINIMUM FLOOR AREA: 1,000 S.F. MINIMUM LOT AREA: 3,000/10,000 S.F. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 30'180' `SEE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN PUD DOCUMENT. (CF) - Community Facility (R) - Residential SITE 1 LAND USE SUMMARY USE ACRES % OF SITE TRACT A: COMMUNITY FACILITY OR t7,093_8ACRES 60.7032.53% RESIDENTIAL DEV. AREA TRACT C: COMMERCIAL OR COMMUNITY 13.29 ACRES 28.17% FACILITY DEV. AREA LAKE 3 1.25 ACRES 10,70% LANDSCAPE BUFFERS t0.76ACRES 6.51% ROW EASEMENTS/RESERVATIONS t 0,50 ACRES 4.28% TRACT B: UPLAND PRESERVE AREA t 1.87 ACRES 16.01 % JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND t 0.21 ACRES 1.80% AREA TOTAL SITE AREA t 11.68 ACRES 10b.00% GENERAL NOTES: ALL REQUIRED WATER MANAGEMENT AND OPEN SPACE AREAS SHALL BE FINALIZED PER LOG SECTION 1 D.02.13.A.I DURING THE SDP REVIEW PROCESS. ZONING: 0-51 © CradyMinor to I LAND USE: I IMPROVED AMENDED BY Q. GRADY MINOR 8 ASSOCIATES, P.A. Il COMMERCIAL i FEBRUARY 27, 2020 D 150' 300' L — — — — J PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCF10N SCALE: " 8 30 WHEN PLOTTED D ®.5 X i 1 1 ENGINEERING INC. M£RmrAN17YL1CFMPt11)REZONE REVISED SHEET MASTER CONCEPT PLAN 353D KRAFF ROAD, SUITE 301 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105 DE 2127I2020 1 of °Y °o' """�-0°" RNae.oTraas pAV1D50N PHONE(239)434.6060 FAXi238)434.6084 E N._ COMPANY ID. NO. 00009496„e„ 1 J AS StrowN ,,,,, aavl ProposedPlan Revisions (S*ffe) ;Jw %-JA%., ..-M %ww ICI ] I 4 � h si TYPE ' u' 1 I DSCF ;I I 8JF E F � I 0 LAXCSCAPTiLIF FH TRACT C ' "' -,�La go a . PROPOSED M I + PFDESTRV M I yam- �. i r7� J r ,er Apr. -n-Al 15, F— •Oy 1 l �.FIrE LAN t: fFER j ii ++ CASTING 0 SIDEWALK .it.. �, 4 — + . —.. . 'BARD SETRACK 1-4a.eti" . 1. Add Tract C 2. Identify potential loading/unloading area for Tract C 3. Identify 15' landscape buffer area adjacent to Steeves Avenue 4. Correct front yard reference on Estey Avenue 6 Proposed Plan Revisions (Notes) Revisions shown in strikethrough/underline PLANNING NOTES: CURRENT ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: DEVELOPMENT TYPEILAND USE: MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD COMMERCIAL, COMMUNITY FACILITY OR RESIDENTIAL I:1mrol 111 A d BE BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM: 45' (CF AND R) TRACT C (COMMERCIAL) 45` ZONED 157'ACTUAL MAXIMUM COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA: 50,000 S.F. MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO (ALF): 0.60 MINIMUM FLOOR AREA: 1,000 S.F. MINIMUM LOTAREA_(R): 3,000/10,000 S.F. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 30'180' 'SEE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN PUD DOCUMENT. (CF) - Community Facility (R) - Residential SITE / LAND USE SUMMARY USE ACRES % OF SITE TRACT A: COMMUNITY FACILITY OR t 7-. 3.8 ACRES 64.-M .S3% RESIDENTIAL DEV. AREA TRACT C: COMMERCIAL OR COMMUNITY 13.29 ACRES 28.17% FACILITY DEV. AREA LAKE t 1.25 ACRES 10.70% LANDSCAPE BUFFERS 10,76 ACRES 6.51 % ROW EASEMENTSIRESERVATIONS ± 0.50 ACRES 4.28% TRACT B: UPLAND PRESERVE AREA ± 1.$7 ACRES 1 &01 % JURISDIC7IONAL WETLAND f 0.21 ACRES 1.80% AREA TOTAL SITE AREA t 11.68 ACRES 100.00% 10 Proposed PUD Revisions TRACT C' Commercial Commercial dcwelopment, limited to limwy automobile dealership of up to 5 D,O DO square feet of gross leasable floor area, mad- be constricted on Tract C_ as shown on the attached Master Concept Plan and identified as Tract I of the Meridian Village Phase I Plat (PB54_ PG 38 and 39)_ The followm' g uses shall be permitted: A. Principal Uses 1_ Any Community Facility- use permitted in Tract A- Cq. umi Facility uses are subject to Exhibit B. Develoument Standards Table I of the PUD_ 2_ Luxiuv Automotive vehicle and eauioment dealers (5511 and 5599)_ Luxury- Automotive dealer shall be any nutomobile dealership (5511) that sells only ne .wd used high -end luxt r vehicles such as, but not limited to, i .amborghini, Ferrari, NRisserati, Lotus, BMW, Alfa Romeo, I -tr= or Jaguar and the hours of operation may be less than a typical automobile dealership and myeatoiy may be limited. 3_ Any other permitted uses. which are comparable in nature with the foregoing list of RtuLutted uses and consistent with purpose and intent statement of the district, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B_ AccessMUses and Stnictures 1 _ Uses and structures that are accessory- and incidental to the principal uses permitted m this district. Table III below sets forth the det-elopment standv-ds for Commerciai within the proposed Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD)_ Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date ofapproval of the SDP or Subdn-isiou p lat_ TABLE III COMMERCIAL CC MAJERC:LAL NAIVE EM-1 LOT AREA N.A. NMIMILTi LOT AV DTH N.A. I%LUMIDlI FLOOR AREA OF BUILDINGS 50-000 square feet PLTD PEEJLNIETLR REQUEKENIEN-rS RIINnfL'11 BUILDING SETBACK (FROM _iIRPORF-PKILENG ROAD) 25 Feet RffNLNK-)I BUILDING SETBACK (FROM ff=-BDL-NTr.-LRF& SOUTHBDL Tr.iRF 50 Feet E_9SF_I,D ffT'SFOFSFEEIT'S_9IZvTT 01Lt7 RffNL%] LTli BL7LDING SETBACK (FROM �'ORFHBO��-DARt) ?5 Feet Internal Drives 15 feet from edge if drive aisle Nhn mum Distance Between St uetwes 20 feet AIAMhILThI HEIGHT Zoned: Principal 5tnicture: AccessM Stntcture: 45 feet 25 feet Actual: Principal Structure: Accessory Stnicture: 57 feet 25 fret PRESERVE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Principal Stnrtures 25 fret ccessory Structures 10 fret Setback from a lake fir all principal and accessory uses may be zero feet (0) priLiided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into the design. Architecaual bwk treatments shall include any stntctttrd materials used to retain earth such as concrete stone or wood placed to LDC: requirements. 11 Proposed Development Commitments Revisions TrcaysvoaTAnoN. c . For a maxitnuyn of 150 Adult day care (LUC 565), 114 PSI Peak Horr, two way trigs, or 6. For a maxi n= I,150 seat Church (LUC 560), approximately 7 D P-M PezLk Hour two Way trigs (10% daily traffic)_ nd e_ For a r a.ximrgm 5D,000 square feet of IgnU auto dealerships{ales (LU 84Q), 112 PM Peal. Hour, t%No--%v trips, limited to Tract C and c-f. For all uses in the aggregate, 143 PM Peak Hour two-way trips_ unless Tract C is developed with a luxiry auto dealership_ which would increase the aggregate to 255 two-way Phi Pea k Hour trigs_ OPE 1 T1O L STALNDAEDS FOR AL-T DE -LER HIP USE- 1 _ V ehici ar loading and unloading shall be permitted only on the eastern side of the dealership hiuldmg facing Airport -Pulling Road_ I Vehicle maintenance shaU occur only indoors. Servioe bTv doors shall remain closed vehicle repair wnlices 12 Conclusion Documents and information can be found online: • Gradyminor.com/Planning • Collier County GMD Public Portal: cvportal.colliergov.net/cityviewweb Next Steps • Hearing signs) posted on property advertising Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and Board of County Commissioner (BCC) hearing dates. • CCPC Hearing - TBD • BCC Hearing - TBD 13 rT r COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 For Petition Number(s): PL20190002496 and PL20190002494 Regarding the above subject petition number(s), Porcha Land Holdings LLC (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: Todd E. Rosenthal As Managing Member Date: �? //J ) C;l-6--;L-0 Signature*: 0 Applicant ❑ Legal Counsel to Applicant * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant.