Loading...
Agenda 11/10/2020 Item #17B (Ordinance - Temple Shalom PUD)17.B 11/10/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from an Estates (E) zoning district to a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development, to allow up 22,000 square feet of civic, social and religious organization (non -sanctuary uses) on Tract 64 and a 302 seat sanctuary, a child care facility for up to 200 children and related uses on Tracts 65 and 68, up to an aggregate maximum of 50,000 square feet on Tracts 65 and 68. The subject property is located at 4630 Pine Ridge Road approximately 4000 feet west of the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Collier Boulevard, in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 13.54: acres; providing for repeal of Resolution Nos. 89-213, 90-418, and 93-290, relating to a temple/church and child care uses, and by providing an effective date. [PL20180003710] (This is a companion to Agenda Item 17.A) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above -referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property is located at 4630 Pine Ridge Road approximately 4000 feet west of the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Collier Boulevard, in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 13.5+/- acres. The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone a 13.5+/- acre property from the Estates (E) zoning district to a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) zoning district. The subject property is comprised of three parcels and is owned by Temple Shalom, Inc. This petition seeks to rezone the property to CFPUD to allow up to 22,000 square feet of civic, social, and religious organization (non -sanctuary uses) on Tract 64 and a 302 seat sanctuary, a child care facility for up to 200 children, and related uses on Tracts 65 and 68, up to an aggregate maximum of 50,000 square feet on Tracts 65 and 68. FISCAL IMPACT: The PUD Rezone (PUDZ) by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build -out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the PUD Rezone is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees Packet Pg. 2151 17.B 11/10/2020 collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. FLUE CONCLUSION: Based on the above analysis, staff finds the subject petition NOT consistent with the FLUE; however, the petition may be deemed consistent IF the companion GMP amendment is adopted and becomes effective. The PUDZ Ordinance needs to contain an effective date linked to the effective date of the companion GMPA. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's April 7, 2020 Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the applicable 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition the proposed development will generate a projected total of +/- 237 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway segments of Pine Ridge Road. This represents an additional +/- 163 PM peak hour, 2-way trips, requested with this petition, to the existing developments approved +/-74 PM peak hour 2-way trips. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway link: Link/Roadway Link 2019 AUIR Current Peak 2019 LOS Hour Peak Remaining Direction Capacity Volume/Peak Direction 125.0/Pine Ridge Road Logan Boulevard to C 2,400/East 853 Collier Boulevard Packet Pg. 2152 17.B 11/10/2020 68.0/Pine Ridge Road I-75 to Logan D 2,800/East 639 48.0/Logan Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach C 1,000/North 292 Road to Pine Ridge Road 49.0/Logan Boulevard Pine Ridge Road to D 1,900/South 341 Green Boulevard 31.1/Collier Boulevard Golden Gate C 3,000/North 1,071 (CR 951) Boulevard to Pine Ridge Road 31.2/Collier Boulevard Pine Ridge Road to C 3,000/North 1,043 (CR 951) Green Boulevard Based on the TIS and the 2019 AUIR, the subject PUD Amendment can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): The petition is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the GMP. The project site in Tract 64 consists of 4.43 acres of native vegetation. Also, there is an existing 0.34 acre preserve in Tracts 65 and 68 from SDP-90-128. A minimum of 0.66 acres (15 percent) preserve is required in Tract 64 plus the existing 0.34 acre preserve in Tracts 65 and 68; therefore, 1 acre of preserve (0.66 + 0.34) shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition PUDZ-PL20180003710 on October 1, 2020, and by a vote of 7-0 recommended to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval with required changes to the PUD as explained below. The CCPC also sat as the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) and recommended approval with a vote of 7-0. The CCPC requested the following change to the PUD: "Events on the outdoor patio for non federation affiliated organization events on Lot 64 will be no more than 9 per year and no more than 90 minutes in length. The event must be affiliated with an indoor event. The outdoor use will be over by 8 pm and there will be no outdoor amplified sound after 7 pm. There will be only one outdoor event per day. " The change was accepted by staff, and this revision was added to the Ordinance. There are letters of opposition with this petition. This opposition is not related to the Zoning, it concerns septic system approvals. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site -specific rezone to a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as the Temple Shalom CFPUD. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for CFPUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. Packet Pg. 2153 17.B 11/10/2020 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed CFPUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with CFPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed CFPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested CFPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? Packet Pg. 2154 11/10/2020 17.B 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed CFPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.11], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the CFPUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons, and the oral testimony presented at the Board hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney's Office. This item is approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: If the Board approves the companion GMP amendment, then staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC, which is reflected in the attached Ordinance and recommends that the Board approve the applicant's request to rezone to the CFPUD zoning district. Prepared by: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Staff Report - Temple Shalom PUDZ (PDF) 2. Attachment A - Revised Proposed Ordinance 10-21-20 (PDF) Packet Pg. 2155 17.B 11/10/2020 3. Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Memo (PDF) 4. [Linked] Attachment C - Letters of Support (PDF) 5. [Linked] Attachment D - Letters of Objection (PDF) 6. Attachment E - Hybrid Meeting Waiver Executed (PDF) 7. [Linked] Attachment F - Application -Backup (PDF) 8. Attachment G - Property Hearing Sign (PDF) 9. legal ad - agenda ID 13083 & 13362 (PDF) Packet Pg. 2156 11/10/2020 17.B COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.B Doc ID: 13083 Item Summary: This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from an Estates (E) zoning district to a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development, to allow up 22,000 square feet of civic, social and religious organization (non -sanctuary uses) on Tract 64 and a 302 seat sanctuary, a child care facility for up to 200 children and related uses on Tracts 65 and 68, up to an aggregate maximum of 50,000 square feet on Tracts 65 and 68. The subject property is located at 4630 Pine Ridge Road approximately 4000 feet west of the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Collier Boulevard, in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 13.5f acres; providing for repeal of Resolution Nos. 89-213, 90-418, and 93-290, relating to a temple/church and child care uses, and by providing an effective date. [PL20180003710] (This is a companion to Agenda Item 17.A) Meeting Date: 11/10/2020 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Tim Finn 10/06/2020 8:40 AM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning — Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 10/06/2020 8:40 AM Approved By: Review: Zoning Growth Management Department Zoning Growth Management Department Growth Management Department County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget Office of Management and Budget County Attorney's Office Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Judy Puig Level 1 Reviewer Anita Jenkins Additional Reviewer Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review James C French Deputy Department Head Review Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 10/06/2020 10:52 AM Completed 10/06/2020 2:36 PM Completed 10/11/2020 6:54 PM Completed 10/12/2020 1:13 PM Completed 10/12/2020 4:44 PM Completed 10/24/2020 12:55 PM Completed 10/26/2020 8:20 AM Completed 10/27/2020 3:23 PM Completed 10/28/2020 11:04 AM Packet Pg. 2157 17.B 11/10/2020 County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Mary,lo Brock Meeting Pending Completed 11/01/2020 8:19 AM 11/10/2020 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 2158 17.B.1 Cooil ie' r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 1, 2020 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20180003710; TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD COMPANION ITEM: PL20180003708/CP-2019-2 PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owner/Applicant: Temple Shalom, Inc. 4630 Pine Ridge Rd. Naples, FL 34119 Agents: Agent: D. Wayne Arnold Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Naples, FL 34103 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone a 13.5+/- acre property from the Estates (E) zoning district to a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) zoning district. The subject property is comprised of three parcels and is owned by Temple Shalom, Inc. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 4630 Pine Ridge Road approximately 4000 feet west of the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Collier Boulevard, in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 13.5+/- acres (see location map on page 2). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petition seeks to rezone the property to CFPUD to allow up to 22,000 square feet of civic, social and religious organization (non -sanctuary uses) on Tract 64 and a 302 seat sanctuary, a child care facility for up to 200 children and related uses on Tracts 65 and 68, up to an aggregate maximum of 50,000 square feet on Tracts 65 and 68. PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 1 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2159 ((zand) LuoleyS eldwel : £80E�) Zand woleyS eldwal-:podeN 1jejS :;uewt4oejjV v CID s� IEP 93 PI � v a a W r+ - x W20 F 2 J r c m Z 3: {� Q e W a a' G {� J d 4 � � J m CL N a Alb ue8aq S (3AlB uAO-1 ❑A -le eaegjeg e}ueS PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Revised: September21, 2020 Q N C) C) 0 0 00 r C) CV J n D Q} Page 2 of 18 17.B.1 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses, zoning classifications, and maximum approved densities for properties surrounding boundaries of Temple Shalom CFPUD: North: Pine Ridge Rd, a four -lane arterial roadway, then developed single-family residential, with a current zoning designation of Estates (E) zoning district East: Developed single-family residential, with a current zoning designation of Estates (E) zoning district South: Developed single-family residential, with a current zoning designation of Estates (E) zoning district West: Developed single-family residential, with a current zoning designation of Estates (E) zoning district Aerial Photo (Q. Grady Minor) PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 3 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2161 17.B.1 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property, a single tax parcel comprised of three tracts (Tract 64, 65 and 68, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 26, less land taken for Pine Ridge Road right-of-way), is designated Estates (Estates — Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict) as identified on the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element (UGGE S-E) of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Relevant to this petition, the Estates designation allows non-residential development per the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. The Conditional Uses Subdistrict allows the conditional uses (CU) listed in the E-Estates zoning district, subject to locational criteria. The site does not meet any of the CU locational criteria, nor is it eligible for commercial zoning. The property is zoned "E" and has an approved conditional use for church (approved prior to adoption of the GGAMP) and day care (approved in 1993 based upon an interpretation that a church -related use did not have to meet the GGAMP locational criteria) on the easterly two tracts (65 & 68); those tracts are developed with a church use (302-seat temple and associated buildings and parking) and a day care/pre-school center (70 children). The westerly tract (64) is undeveloped and wooded. The effect of this rezone petition is to retain the church (temple) use; allow the day care/pre-school use to expand to accommodate 200 children; add the use civic, social and fraternal association — religious affiliated only (allowed by CU in the "E" district); and, add the use educational, religious and charitable trusts (allowed in BP -Business Park zoning district as a secondary (commercial) use). As existing uses, the church and day care/pre-school uses are allowed to remain; the day care can expand as a church -related use per the previously noted interpretation. The addition of new uses is not consistent with the UGGE S-E of the GGAMP. There is a companion GMP amendment petition (PL2018-0003708/CP-2019-2) to establish the Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict in the GGAMP intended to allow the uses and intensities proposed in this CFPUD; this CFPUD petition is dependent, in part, upon that GMP amendment petition to achieve consistency. Based upon the above analysis, the proposed PUD rezone may only be deemed consistent with the UGGE S-E of the GGAMP at such time as the companion GMP amendment petition (PL20180003708/CP-2019-2) is adopted and goes into effect. Note: The PUD Ordinance needs to provide for the effective date to be linked to the effective date of the companion GMP amendment petition. (See Attachment B — FLUE Consistency Review) Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's April 7, 2020 Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the applicable 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 4 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2162 is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project' significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition the proposed development will generate a projected total of +/- 237 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway segments of Pine Ridge Road. This represents an additional +/- 163 PM peak hour, 2-way trips, requested with this petition, to the existing developments approved +/-74 PM peak hour 2-way trips. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway link: Link/Roadway Link 2019 AUIR Current Peak 2019 LOS Hour Peak Remaining Direction Capacity Volume/Peak Direction 125.0/Pine Ridge Logan Boulevard C 2,400/East 853 Road to Collier Boulevard 68.0/Pine Ridge Road 1-75 to Logan D 2,800/East 639 48.0/Logan Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach C 1,000/North 292 Road to Pine Ridge Road 49.0/Logan Boulevard Pine Ridge Road D 1,900/South 341 to Green Boulevard 31.1/Collier Golden Gate C 3,000/North 1,071 Boulevard Boulevard to Pine CR 951 Ridge Road 31.2/Collier Pine Ridge Road C 3,000/North 1,043 Boulevard to Green CR 951 Boulevard PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 5 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2163 17.B.1 Based on the TIS and the 2019 AUIR, the subject PUD Amendment can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): The petition is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME) of the GMP. The project site in Tract 64 consists of 4.43 acres of native vegetation. Also, there is an existing 0.34 acre preserve in Tracts 65 and 68 from SDP-90-128. A minimum of 0.66 acres (15 percent) preserve is required in Tract 64 plus the existing 0.34 acre preserve in Tracts 65 and 68; therefore, 1 acre of preserve (0.66 + 0.34) shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses the aforementioned criteria as the basis for its recommendation to the Board, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning or amendment request. In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document to address environmental concerns. The PUD preserve requirement for Tract 64 is 0.66 acres (15 percent of 4.43 acres) plus the existing 0.34 acre preserve in Tracts 65 and 68. The proposed PUD Master Plan provides 1 acres of preserve, which meets the minimum 15 percent native vegetation preservation requirement for Tract 64 in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07 in addition to the existing 0.34 acre preserve in Tracts 65 and 68. Tillandsia spp. were observed. No other listed species were observed on the property. This project requires Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project meets the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Specifically, the petition includes two environmental deviation requests to allow: 1) accessory structures and all other site alterations to have a zero -foot setback from the parking areas located adjacent to the existing preserve from SDP-90-128, and 2) the existing Oak Hammock area to be a standalone preserve that is not interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas of wildlife corridors. PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 6 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2164 17.B.1 Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD) but is outside of any wastewater service area. The project will continue to be served by septic systems since no active wastewater infrastructure is readily available. Water service is readily available via connections to existing infrastructure on -site and within adjacent right-of-way. Sufficient water treatment capacity is available. Emergency Management Review: Emergency Management staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Landscape Review: The landscape buffers on the master plan are consistent with LDC requirements Stormwater Drainaze Review: Stormwater Management staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Zoning Services Review: Staff has evaluated the uses proposed and their intensities and the development standards such as building heights, setbacks, and landscape buffers. Staff also evaluated the building mass, building location and orientation, the amount and type of open space and its location, and traffic generation/attraction of the proposed uses. After this review, staff has determined that the proposed uses are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Temple Shalom owns 13.5+/- acres of property located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 3/4 mile west of Collier Boulevard. The Temple initially received provisional use approval for a temple and temple related facilities (religious facilities) in 1989 on 9+/- acres of its property. Its original application included all 13.5+/- acres; however, because the Temple did not have more specific plans for the westernmost portion (Tract 64) of the property, the County Commission requested removal of that portion of the site from the provisional use application. The Temple was instructed to amend the conditional use once it decided upon more specific plans for use of Tract 64. In 1993, the Temple received conditional use approval for a childcare center on the 9+/- acres that had been developed with the Temple and associated uses (Resolution #93- 290). The original conditional use for the childcare facility limited enrollment to 70 children. However, due to increased demand in the area of non -denominational childcare, the number of children utilizing the Temple's childcare facility has increased over the years, with the County's knowledge. In 2000, the Temple added approximately 21,000 square feet to its facilities, pursuant to SDP-90-128(E), to accommodate the increased demand. This past year, approximately 180 students utilized the childcare facility. The CFPUD proposed by this rezone application limits enrollment to 200 students to reflect the increased demand and utilization. Collier County approved the 1989 provisional use and the 1993 conditional use prior to the 2000 adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP). Those pre-existing uses have been deemed consistent by policy with the GGAMP. However, the Temple does not meet the Urban PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 7 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2165 17.B.1 Golden Gate Estate's Sub -Element (UGGE S-E) of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan GGAMP's locational criteria for churches and similar uses to obtain conditional use approval. Accordingly, a companion Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) has been filed with this CFPUD rezone application, which proposes to create a subdistrict in the GGAMP to permit religious facilities, childcare and social organization uses on the Temple's property. As mentioned above, this CFPUD rezone application proposes to increase the number of students for the childcare facility to a maximum of 200. The childcare facility would continue to be limited to Tracts 65 and 68. However, the rezone application also proposes to permit the religious and social organization uses on the entire 13.5+1- property (Tracts 64, 65 and 68). Temple Shalom provides congregants with a place to worship, observe religious studies and to provide a social resource for the Jewish faith. As part of its overall program activities, Temple Shalom partners with other Jewish faith agencies such as the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to provide a variety of services beyond worship or child day care. Most of these activities occur in some form presently at the Temple's campus and include: • Youth Activities • Philanthropic Activities • Social Action Activities • Volunteer Activities • Community Service • Community Events • Community Outreach • Interfaith Outreach • Men's and Women's Group Activities • Semi -catered Community Events • Book Lectures • Religious administrative functions such as administration, accounting, staff offices, and fund raising • Adult Jewish Education programs • Israel Education • Judaic Discussion Groups Obtaining the CFPUD and companion GMPA approval for religious facilities and related activities will permit the Temple and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples an opportunity to combine efforts to expand their community outreach for Jewish religious and cultural programming in a single campus environment, to meet the demands of the increasing population of those of the Jewish faith in Collier County. The conceptual master plan proposes no changes to the existing campus facilities, but it identifies the proposed new facilities on the undeveloped portion of the campus (Tract 64) for the abovementioned non -worship uses. The new facilities include a building of approximately 22,000 square feet with associated parking, accessory outdoor patios, and gathering spaces for the variety of services and events related to the Jewish Federation and Temple's mission to provide religious, cultural and social resources for the Jewish community. PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 8 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2166 17.B.1 The property falls within the GGAMP and is zoned Estates. While the eastern portion of the property (Tracts 65 and 68) possesses conditional use approval (as previously explained), the western portion of the property (Tract 64) does not meet the locational criteria for a conditional use. Therefore, the Temple has requested a companion GMPA, which would create a new subdistrict in the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -element of the GGAMP and authorize the Temple to utilize the entirety of the property assemblage for church (religious facility), childcare and social and religious organization uses. The proposal also increases the maximum number of children for the childcare facility to 200. All development will occur consistent with the standards in the CFPUD, which closely mirror those in the Estates zoning district. The proposed CFPUD includes a zoned building height of 30 feet and an actual height of 40 feet for principal uses. For accessory uses, the zoned height is 20 feet with an actual height 25 feet for accessory uses. All surrounding properties are zoned Estates with maximum heights for principal uses at 30 feet. The proposed heights for the CFPUD will be consistent and compatible with the surrounding properties. The proposed CFPUD will be required to meet the architectural and site design standards in the LDC at the time of site plan approval. The proposed CFPUD includes a front setback from the Pine Ridge Road right-of-way of 75 feet, 100 feet from the western boundary, 75 feet from the southern boundary, and 30 feet from the eastern boundary. The Estates zoning district requires 75-foot front and rear yard setbacks and 30 feet setback for sideyards. The proposed CFPUD setbacks will be consistent and compatible with the surrounding properties. Additionally, 30 percent of the property will be designated as open space and included in this open space calculation is a 0.66 acre preserve area, located along the west boundary that will separate the CFPUD from the neighboring western property zoned Estates. The Master Plan proposes a 20-foot wide "Type D" buffer along Pine Ridge Road on the north boundary of the PUD, and a 15-foot "Type B" buffer along the east, west, and south boundaries of the PUD. These buffers are consistent with the required buffers of the surrounding properties. The locations of buildings, setbacks, and open space contribute to the project's compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08." Staff offers the following analysis: 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The PUD already receives potable water service from the CCWSD, and there is adequate water treatment capacity available to future development as proposed by this petition. The conceptual master plan (Temple Shalom CFPUD Document - Exhibit C) reserves space for a drainfield to facilitate septic service to the expanded project. PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 9 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2167 17.B.1 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report (or within an accompanying memorandum). 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Staff Analysis section of this staff report subsection Landscape Review, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure will continue to be sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. Moreover, the CCWSD has sufficient treatment capacity for water service to the project. Wastewater service will be accomplished onsite via septic system. PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 10 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2168 17.B.1 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including a readily available County water main, to accommodate this project, and the property can support a septic system for wastewater service. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Six deviations are proposed in connection with this request to rezone to CFPUD. See deviations section of the staff report beginning on page 14. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.17 states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners... shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable": 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP, subject to approval of the companion GMPA. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The subject parcel is of sufficient size and therefore will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. It is also comparable with expected land uses by virtue of its consistency with the FLUE of the GMP. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. As shown on the zoning maps and aerial included on pages 2 and 3 of this report, the existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed PUD zoning boundaries follow the property ownership boundaries. The boundary of the subject parcel is illustrated in the zoning maps and aerial in this staff report on pages 2 and 3. PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 11 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2169 17.B.1 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed rezone is not necessary but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. It should be noted that the proposed uses are not allowed under the current zoning classification. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD Rezone is consistent with the County's land use policies that are reflected by the FLUE of the GMP if the companion SSGMPA is adopted. Development in compliance with the proposed PUD rezone should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure will continue to have adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed development will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The current zoning designation of Estates (E) zoning district includes a maximum allowable height for principal uses of 30 feet. The proposed CPUD includes a maximum allowable height of 30 feet zoned and 40 feet actual. The proposed CPUD also eliminates the potential for other uses that could impact light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 12 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2170 17.B.1 is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Properties to the north, east, west, and south are developed, as previously noted. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the LDC is that sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. The proposed CFPUD does not constitute a grant of special privilege. The petition is only consistent with the GMPA if the companion petition is approved. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The proposed uses and development standards are not permitted, according to the existing classification. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD rezone is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or County. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 13 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2171 17.B.1 services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking six deviations from the requirements of the LDC. The deviations are directly extracted from PUD Exhibit E. The petitioner's rationale and staff analysis/recommendation is outlined below. Proposed Deviation #1: (Grass Parking) "Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.02.B.l.a.iv., Off Street Parking and Loading, which reads as follows: "Parking lots in excess of 200 parking spaces may surface 15 percent of the required off- street parking spaces in grass. Such grass parking spaces shall be located along the outlying perimeter of the parking lot." Notwithstanding the LDC provision above, this CFPUD may surface up to 70 percent of the required off-street parking spaces in grass/lawn, and the grass/lawn spaces may be located in the areas labelled "grass parking" on the master plan. Petitioner's Justification: Churches and school uses are permitted to utilize stabilized grass parking for up to 70% of their required parking. All uses proposed on the site are religious or school affiliated and will share parking throughout the site. The provided paved parking provides more than adequate parking for daily use needs for all facilities within the PUD. The grassed parking areas will primarily be utilized during hours for religious services or events. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Proposed Deviation #2: (Off -Street Parking) PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 14 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2172 17.B.1 "Deviation 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.08 F.2.b.ii.a, Interior lots, which requires no more than 80 percent of the off- street parking for the entire commercial building or project shall be located between any primary fagade of the commercial building or project and the abutting street or navigable waterway, to instead allow 100 percent of the off- street parking for the entire project to be located between the primary fagade of the commercial building and the abutting street." Petitioner's Justification: Due to the project being an expansion of an existing facility, the site contains location restrictions in terms of location of ingress/egress, surface water management, and preserve areas. Furthermore, in an effort to appease the abutting western neighbor, the applicant has strategically placed the required buffer in an effort to maximize the western buffer. The neighbor also expressed concern of the location of the septic tank and drain field in relation to the neighbors onsite potable water well. As a result, the septic tank and drain field has been place at the furthest location possible from the neighbors well. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Proposed Deviation #3: (Preserve Areas) "Deviation 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07 H.3.a., preserve standards, which requires accessory structures and all other site alterations shall have a minimum 10-foot setback from the boundary of any preserve to instead allow a zero foot setback from parking areas located adjacent to the existing preserve from SDP-90-128." Petitioner's Justification: The original site improvements were installed prior to the County's requirement to have native vegetation preservation for non-residential development. The existing Oak Hammock preserve area has parking and walkways within 10 feet of the preserve area. The deviation will allow the preserve area and the nearby parking and walkways to continue to function as presently configured. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Environmental staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed deviation request. As stated by the applicant, there is existing parking and walkways within 10 feet of the preserve area that was approved under the original SDP-90-128. This deviation allows the existing parking, walkways, and preserve areas to remain in the same configuration as the original approval. This deviation satisfies the goals and objectives of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan by maintaining the required preserve area in the existing Oak Hammock preserve. Zoning and Development Review Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 15 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2173 17.B.1 approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation Proposed Deviation #4: (Six foot decorative wall/fence) "Deviation 4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.G.1.a. and b.i., Supplemental Standards, which states that chain link (including wire mesh) and wood fences are prohibited forward of the primary fagade and shall be a minimum of 100 feet from a public right-of-way. If these types of fences face a public or private street then they shall be screened with an irrigated hedge planted directly in front of the fence on the street side. Plant material shall be a minimum of 3 gallons in size and planted no more than 3 feet on center at time of installation. This plant material must be maintained at no less than three-quarters of the height of the adjacent fence and that fences shall not exceed 4 feet in height, to instead allow installation of a 6' high chain link fence forward of the primary building fagade to within 100' of the Pine Ridge Road ROW. Where chain link fencing is provided, a hedge or landscape buffer shall be provided on the external side of the chain link fence consistent with the requirements of Section 5.03.02.G. La. and b.i. The location of the chain link fencing and proposed decorative aluminum fencing is depicted on Exhibit C, Master Plan." Petitioner's Justification: The Temple has been conducting on -going security assessments as have other faith -based organizations and has determined that a 6' high fence around the perimeter of the PUD is a necessary security measure. The security fencing will be a combination of 6' high decorative wall/fence along Pine Ridge Road, which would extend south 100 linear feet near the east and west property lines, and then a 6' high chain link fence may be provided for the remainder of the east, west and south property lines. As with schools, churches have been the subject of threats and attacks. While a 6' high fence is not impenetrable, it will provide for deterrence and some level of security. The proposed use of chain link fencing forward of the fagade will not create a negative visual for motorists using Pine Ridge Road as it will be setback 100' from the ROW and will be obscured by a hedge and landscape material. The size of the site (13.5± acres) makes it infeasible to provide decorative fencing where building placement has purposely been located greater than 100' from the property line. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5.11, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation Proposed Deviation #5: (Standalone Preserve) "Deviation 5 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07.A.5., preserve standards, which requires preservation areas shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, to instead allow the existing Oak Hammock area as a standalone preserve." Petitioner's Justification: PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 16 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2174 17.B.1 The previously approved conditional use for Tracts 65 and 68 did not include Tract 64. The property was developed around the existing Oak Hammock Preserve with the approval of SDP 90- 128, which does not allow for interconnection to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors on adjacent parcels or Tract 64. The preserve area on Tract 64 does interconnect to adjoining off -site open space areas and it will serve as a buffer to the immediate neighbor to the west. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Environmental staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed deviation request. As stated by the applicant, Tract 64 was not included in the original conditional use for Tracts 65 and 68. The location of the existing Oak Hammock preserve in Tracts 65 and 68 does not allow interconnection to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. This deviation satisfies the goals and objectives of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan by providing the preserve area in Tract 64 that is interconnected to adjoining off -site open space areas and a buffer to the immediate neighbor to the west. Zoning and Development Review Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation Proposed Deviation #6: (Stabilized Grass Surface) "Deviation 6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.02.B.l.a.iii, Off Street Parking and Loading, Design Standards, which requires Up to 70 percent of the parking spaces for houses of worship and schools may be surfaced with grass or lawn, when the County Manager or designee determines that the paving of some or all parking spaces for houses of worship and schools will have significant negative environmental impacts to instead allow community facility uses within the PUD to also provide up to 70% of any parking to be surfaced with grass." Petitioner's Justification: Parking for uses within the CFPUD will be shared. While worship services are not permitted on Tract 64, all property and buildings will be owned by Temple Shalom. All parking is not anticipated to be needed on a daily basis; therefore, it makes sense to permit parking to be surfaced with stabilized grass surface as permitted for churches and schools. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on October 30, 2019 at Temple Shalom located at 4630 Pine Ridge Road. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:39 p.m. and ended at 6:42 p.m. The applicant's PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 17 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2175 17.B.1 agent explained the request for the proposed rezone and the companion large-scale GMP amendment. Wayne Arnold and Richard Yovanovich, the agents, conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team and staff, and an overview of the proposed CFPUD rezoning application. Mr. Arnold explained that the project will need the GMP Amendment in order to facilitate the PUD rezone process. Mr. Arnold had explained that the Jewish Federation is proposing to build a 22,000 square foot building to be used for special events, pre-school/child day care activities, adult education, community events, youth activities, philanthropic activities, office uses, and classes. Following the agent's presentation, the meeting was opened up to attendees to make comments and ask the consultant team questions regarding the proposed development. The concerns the attendees raised were selling off tracts, the traffic study, the number of people coming into the building, the addition of the second entrance, the preserves and water management, parking requirement deficiencies, draining and sewage into the ground resulting in ground contamination, grassed parking, right-of-way access points, traffic accidents, and the possibility of moving the second access further to the west. No commitments were made. A copy of the sign -in sheet, PowerPoint presentation, and NIM transcript are included in the backup materials in Attachment F. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW: This project requires Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project meets the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Specifically, the petition includes two environmental deviation requests to allow: 1) accessory structures and all other site alterations to have a zero -foot setback from the parking areas located adjacent to the existing preserve from SDP-90-128, and 2) the existing Oak Hammock area to be a standalone preserve that is not interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas of wildlife corridors. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on September 21, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: A) Proposed Ordinance B) FLUE Consistency Memo C) Letters of Support D) Letters of Objection E) Hybrid Meeting Waiver F) Application -Backup Materials PUDZ-PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Page 18 of 18 Revised: September 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 2176 17.B.2 ORDINANCE NO.20- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT TO A COMMUNITY FACILITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO ALLOW UP 22,000 SQUARE FEET OF CIVIC, SOCIAL AND RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION (NON -SANCTUARY USES) ON TRACT 64 AND A 302 SEAT SANCTUARY, A CHILD CARE FACILITY FOR UP TO 200 CHILDREN AND RELATED USES ON TRACTS 65 AND 68, AND UP TO AN AGGREGATE MAXIMUM OF 50,000 SQUARE FEET ON TRACTS 65 AND 68. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 4630 PINE RIDGE ROAD APPROXIMATELY 4000 FEET WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF PINE RIDGE ROAD AND COLLIER BOULEVARD, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 13.5f ACRES; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTION NOS. 89-213, 90-418, AND 93-290, RELATING TO A TEMPLE/CHURCH AND CHILD CARE USES, AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20180003710] WHEREAS, Temple Shalom, Inc., represented by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor & Associates, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: [19-CPS-01922/1575098/1] 111 Temple Shalom PUD/PL20180003710 Page 1 of 2 10/21/20 Packet Pg. 2177 17.B.2 SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from an Estates (E) Zoning District to a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Zoning District for a 13.53+/- acre parcel to be known as Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development, in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Resolution Nos. 89-213, 90-418 and 93-290 are hereby repealed. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. 20 - becomes effective. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2020. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA am , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney HFAC 10-21-20 Attachments: Exhibit A: Permitted Uses I: Burt L. Saunders, Chairman Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: Requested Deviations from LDC Exhibit F: Developer Commitments [I 9-CPS-0 1922/1575098/11111 Temple Shalom PUD/PL20180003710 10/21/20 Page 2 of 2 N 0 D a E 0 rn as a E as M 00 0 M r Packet Pg. 2178 17.B.2 EXHIBIT A TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD PERMITTED USES A maximum of 22,000 square feet of civic, social and religious organization (non -sanctuary) uses shall be permitted on Tract 64, and a 302-seat sanctuary and related church/religious facilities and 200 student pre- school uses shall be permitted within the CFPUD on Tracts 65 and 68. The building area for Tracts 65 and 68 shall be a maximum of 50,000 square feet. The uses are subject to the trip cap identified in Exhibit F, Section 4.a of this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: COMMUNITY FACILITY A. Principal Uses: 1. Child day care/pre-school center (Tracts 65 and 68 only) (8351) 2. Civic, social and fraternal association (religious affiliated only) (8641) 3. Educational, religious or charitable trusts (6732) 4. Religious organizations, including churches, temples and other places of worship; (8661) religious instruction, religious philanthropic and religious organizations 5. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the BZA or the Hearing Examiner B. Accessory Uses: 1. Administrative offices 2. Indoor and outdoor recreational facilities including but not limited to fitness facilities, playgrounds, nature trails, and similar facilities. 3. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the permitted uses within this CFPUD document. 4. Water management facilities to serve the project such as lakes. 5. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos, plazas and picnic areas. 6. Any other accessory and related use that is determined to be comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this CFPUD, as determined by the BZA or the Hearing Examiner. PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A-F-CCPC.docx October 1, 2020 Page 1 of 10 Packet Pg. 2179 C. Prohibited Uses: 1. Soup kitchens 2. Homeless shelters 3. Offender rehabilitation agencies 4. Public welfare offices 5. Self-help organizations for alcoholics 6. Refugee services D. Operational Standards: 1. No outdoor amplified music shall be permitted between 8:00 p.m. and 9 a.m. 2. Childcare hours of operation are 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. 3. Events on the outdoor patio for non -federation affiliated organization events on Tract 64 will be no more than 9 per year and no more than 90 minutes in length. The event must be affiliated with an indoor event. The outdoor use will be over by 8 pm and there will be no outdoor amplified sound after 7 pm. There will be only one outdoor event per day. PRESERVE A. Allowable Uses: 1. Preserve. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Uses subject to LDC section Allowable Uses within County required preserves PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A-F-CCPC.docx October 1, 2020 Page 2 of 10 N a_ E 0 a� a E aD ch 00 0 M Packet Pg. 2180 17.B.2 EXHIBIT B TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Temple Shalom CFPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. MINIMUM LOT AREA N/A N/A AVERAGE LOT WIDTH N/A N/A MINIMUM YARDS (External) From Pine Ridge Road ROW 75 ft. 75 ft. From Western PUD Boundary 100 ft. 50 ft. From Eastern PUD Boundary 30 ft. 30 ft. From Southern PUD Boundary 75 ft. 50 ft. (1) From Preserves 25 ft. 10 ft. MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 20 ft. 10 ft. MAXIMUM HEIGHTa pu'�3i <<I Ht'c ,ar 3 30 ft. F dip ail ii i� R'' ..0 a u; 20 ft. Zoned Actual 40 ft. (2) 25 ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA N/A N/A MAXIMUM GROSS BUILDING AREA Tract 64 Tracts 65 and 68 22,000 sq. ft. 50,000 sq. ft. N/A NOTES: (1) Except 40 ft. for the tarpaulin/shade cover over the outdoor play area, as depicted on the master plan. (2) Not to exceed a maximum of 2 stories. PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A -F-CCPC. docx October 1, 2020 Page 3 of 10 N 0 a E 0 Ta m a aEi M w 0 M Packet Pg. 2181 17.B.2 H1f10S .00I dN31X3 Ol 30N3J /UVb1003a HOIH .9 !--a I U3 J LU H ~ ¢ Z W ;❑ wN } z D O m w a O w a U) J H� ¢ Z w c�i� ❑ w� LU a3z w �LUw WY ❑ W J 3mz tea= �¢U p 2 Zz= )E INO NOti"3033 HSIM31' dl-tlN0l1'\JNINNtl IG - I'Vtltl c N Q W O J o. ¢w � o El N C a G o O v zC 5 C to O �aCli N m N = LJ O Q. lo CO w <C 4 Co M 0 Co (O Co J Ln Ss 4 wF (O �mm F w w❑ L1 LI W ~ N ¢ , W o °' _ ¢ W ` Co _ (0 W od W 'c a LU p con a ^o 22 H ¢ mB m� v N cn W © s a U o ¢ rn a 0 0 U 'E w CD LU PF2E5f2V ' .' .ZLL .,...,.. . .•..•.•.•, YLL Q Co J d Lf w¢_ d ~ ¢ U I Ww Q pLL� �w Z z cn m Tz LLI } ��z(� LU mow¢ CL =❑ > Z_w0 W Z �¢ `D-w W w� �am3¢z o Co Cl) g wp 2(L 2 ❑WUw az D¢>O z zw w �00 Zmwz 5 z ? o am �zw mz o Packet Pg. 2182 17.B.2 HV :6 OZOZ 9 MO 'CA tl-d N-91 -VNojr\sQNVAV80\ZOnd ONV VdND NQUY8303A HSIM f 9L -VNOJ NINNVId - f d ONINNVI 3113 lV 1V100 NF--z0 W W W z F- = To c(pp m R Y Y M CO W z � =OQUwO g F- S w z Ox uj p wpOwLL C�p w <o w ZZ pwQLLp Oow>LLz UoW2mF- <C6IW2g zzLL wP a. LL Q O Co ~ w > U LL w 0 O (n wwQma j zm g�p(nzOJ V 1-0 oN w JpWZQ Uzi �02zw0E- CJQw5>LL =a M LLJ Lug W 0 L J w o wZSU`�wW u~j z> p 0 W 4� �UwoLLW~ gF'OLLLL2Q W OOOD3: aw< .-OW > wz0wwz mow= ZFW- WagF-W (n wamwF zw 0 J = O P J z W <t; 4 p Q (n Q F- uj m Co X OZWOw�m g' ¢ $ W 00 Wm(n>'O0 =� �r �F pMJQQQQ. J� a zOdw z>Lu U� Ww V�gmw-gQ Q o dLU > LL W~ z S N c UU F- >wF- ?z Q Q Q � W Z d�> Q Z LL ri Corn 0 F- < P Lu _ 0 z wW CL wU)z aN o �_ Q > U d w C9F-wz C u (0(`DD wQ DzF=-zW�F- � o �g�°>wZ UU Cl? v D z U) <WU)w a. Czv" X z� w O zF"z,WiMa=~ � U) W a>-F -LL wUg L:LL Q �� H wNZm=P(nw ©V� (n(n QQ W � HQaoozzLL0 S 00 M d Q U)J Oa 00 M (0D O d zOQaaSSwcpn 04 N((p QQ �00� w Q ZF-w} WSmW W W z U) Jp F 0Z)F- W oo U� U a � Y a=aLL 0�F- O U � w vv ¢oz 0 m Q m Q 0 WWm?-W:5 m z U Q m Q V)I� X z �' H Q z_ z> NW Ha z p �>- w z cD CD W Y uWj Cl)~Y O� w LLI 0 a w O HLLId p 00 OVVD LU Q O w w Q �(nu;i�z�ww H Q�WU LLI�� w��� m d (� d zj�dwgaQ ' Q L—uW�W� m U» >HH> cn cn z W W W CO gWowL� J}m W c~—nO W z �ww Ww w z0 Lu Q W -WZW WCLmz m �(.) z�a �� a H C� a a LL a C� =CLz=p(=n�g F-aQ�_ (n H 0 a �N❑M❑❑❑❑ Z N ❑ Packet Pg. 2183 17.B.2 EXHIBIT D TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT 64, LESS THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF; TRACT 65, LESS THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF; TRACT 68, LESS THE NORTH 75 FEETTHEREOF; GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 26, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 15 AND 16, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A-F-CCPC.docx October 1, 2020 Page 6 of 10 Packet Pg. 2184 17.B.2 EXHIBIT E TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC DEVIATION 1: From LDC Section 4.05.02.B.1.a.iv., Off Street Parking and Loading, Design Standards, which reads as follows: "Parking lots in excess of 200 parking spaces may surface 15 percent of the required off- street parking spaces in grass. Such grass parking spaces shall be located along the outlying perimeter of the parking lot." Notwithstanding the LDC provision above, this CFPUD may surface up to 70 percent of the required off-street parking spaces in grass/lawn, and the grass/lawn spaces may be located in the areas labelled "grass parking" on the master plan. DEVIATION 2: From LDC Section 5.05.08 F.2.b.ii.a), Interior lots, which requires no more than 80 percent of the off- street parking for the entire commercial building or project shall be located between any primary facade of the commercial building or project and the abutting street or navigable waterway, to instead allow 100 percent of the off- street parking for the entire project to be located between the primary facade of the commercial building and the abutting street. DEVIATION 3: From LDC Section 3.05.07 H.3.a., preserve standards, which requires accessory structures and all other site alterations shall have a minimum 10-foot setback from the boundary of any preserve to instead allow a zero foot setback from parking areas located adjacent to the existing preserve from SDP-90-128. DEVIATION 4: From LDC Section 5.03.02.G.1.a. and b.i., Supplemental Standards, which states that chain link (including wire mesh) and wood fences are prohibited forward of the primary fagade and shall be a minimum of 100 feet from a public right-of-way. If these types of fences face a public or private street then they shall be screened with an irrigated hedge planted directly in front of the fence on the street side. Plant material shall be a minimum of 3 gallons in size and planted no more than 3 feet on center at time of installation. This plant material must be maintained at no less than three-quarters of the height of the adjacent fence and that fences shall not exceed 4 feet in height, to instead allow installation of a 6' high chain link fence forward of the primary building fagade to within 100' of the Pine Ridge Road ROW. Where chain link fencing is provided, a hedge or landscape buffer shall be provided on the external side of the chain link fence consistent with the requirements of Section 5.03.02.G.1.a. and b.i. The location of the chain link fencing and proposed decorative aluminum fencing is depicted on Exhibit C, Master Plan. DEVIATION 5: From LDC Section 3.05.07.A.5., preserve standards, which requires preservation areas shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, to instead allow the existing Oak Hammock area as a standalone preserve. PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A-F-CCPC.docx October 1, 2020 Page 7 of 10 Packet Pg. 2185 17.B.2 DEVIATION 6: From LDC Section 4.05.02.B.1.a.iii, Off Street Parking and Loading, Design Standards, which requires Up to 70 percent of the parking spaces for houses of worship and schools may be surfaced with grass or lawn, when the County Manager or designee determines that the paving of some or all parking spaces for houses of worship and schools will have significant negative environmental impacts to instead allow community facility uses within the PUD to also provide up to 70% of any parking to be surfaced with grass. PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A-F-CCPC.docx October 1, 2020 Page 8 of 10 Packet Pg. 2186 17.B.2 EXHIBIT F TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 1. PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Temple Shalom, Inc., 4630 Pine Ridge Road, Naples FL 34119. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 2. MISCELLANEOUS Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. (Section 125.022, FS) b. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL a. Approximately 0.34± acres of native vegetation was retained as part of the initial property development (Tracts 65 and 68). The 0.34± acres shall be deemed to meet the native vegetation requirements for tract 65 and 68. For the undeveloped Tract 64 (4.43± acres) area of the property, a minimum of 15% or 0.66± acres (4.43 acres x .15) of the existing native vegetation shall be retained on site. A total of 1.0 acres of native vegetation shall be retained on site (0.34 acres + 0.66 acres). b. A management plan for Florida black bear shall be submitted for review and approval at time of final plat or SDP for the project, whichever is applicable. PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A-F-CCPC.docx October 1, 2020 Page 9 of 10 Packet Pg. 2187 17.B.2 4. TRANSPORTATION a. The CFPUD shall be limited to a maximum of 237 weekday p.m. peak hour two-way trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. b. For religious holiday services and other scheduled events where greater than 400 attendees are anticipated, the property owner or event host shall provide traffic control at project entrances and exits by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider, with staffing and locations as directed by the County Manager or his designee. 5. LANDSCAPING a. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. In order to meet the requirements of a Type 'B' buffer along the western boundary of the PUD, a 6-foot-wide landscape buffer reservation has been identified on the master plan. In the event that the preserve does not meet buffer requirements after removal of exotics and supplemental planting within the preserve, plantings will be provided in the 6' wide reservation to meet the buffer requirements. The type, size, and number of such plantings, if necessary, will be determined at time of initial SDP or plat and included on the landscape plans for the SDP or plat. PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A-F-CCPC.docx October 1, 2020 Page 10 of 10 Packet Pg. 2188 17.B.3 Ci:4�e r Cop tt" ty Growth Management Department Zoning Division Memorandum To: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: April 6, 2020 Subject: Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PUDZ-PL20180003710 REV:4 PETITION NAME: Temple Shalom CFPUD REQUEST: Rezone +13.5 acres from E-Estates zoning district to Community Facility Planned Unit Development to permit four specified uses: 1) child day care/pre-school center; 2) civic, social and fraternal association - religious affiliated only; 3) educational, religious or charitable trusts; and, 4) religious organizations including churches, temples and other places of worship, religious instruction, religious philanthropic organizations. Submittal 4 addressed all staff comments. LOCATION: The subject site is on the south side of Pine Ridge Road (CR 896), 3/a mile west of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property, a single tax parcel comprised of three tracts (Tract 64, 65 and 68, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 26, less land taken for Pine Ridge Road right-of-way), is designated Estates (Estates — Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict) as identified on the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element (UGGE S-E) of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Relevant to this petition, the Estates designation allows non-residential development per the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. The Conditional Uses Subdistrict allows the conditional uses (CU) listed in the E-Estates zoning district, subject to locational criteria. The site does not meet any of the CU locational criteria, nor is it eligible for commercial zoning. The property is zoned "E" and has an approved conditional use for church (approved prior to adoption of the GGAMP) and day care (approved in 1993 based upon an interpretation that a church -related use did not have to meet the GGAMP locational criteria) on the easterly two tracts (65 & 68); those tracts are developed with a church use (302-seat temple and associated buildings and parking) and a day care/pre-school center (70 children). The westerly tract (64) is undeveloped and wooded. The effect of this rezone petition is to retain the church (temple) use; allow the day care/pre-school use to expand to accommodate 200 children; add the use civic, social and fraternal association — religious affiliated only (allowed by CU in the "E" district); and, add the use educational, religious and charitable trusts (allowed in BP -Business Park zoning district as a secondary (commercial) use). Packet Pg. 2189 17.B.3 As existing uses, the church and day care/pre-school uses are allowed to remain; the day care can expand as a church -related use per the previously noted interpretation. The addition of new uses is not consistent with the UGGE S-E of the GGAMP. There is a companion GMP amendment petition (PL2018-0003708/CP-2019-2) to establish the Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict in the GGAMP intended to allow the uses and intensities proposed in this CFPUD; this CFPUD petition is dependent, in part, upon that GMP amendment petition to achieve consistency. Certain Future Land Use Element (FLUE) policies are provided below, with staff analysis following in [bold] . Policy 5.6 New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses as set forth in the Land Development Code. [Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to Zoning Services staff as part of their review of thepetition in its entirety. However, staff would note that in reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses/intensities on the subject site, the compatibility analysis might include a review of both the subject proposal and surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location, traffic generation/attraction, etc.] Policy 7.1 The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [Exhibit C, PUD Master Plan, depicts access to Pine Ridge Road, an arterial road as identified in the Transportation Element of the GMP.] Policy 7.2 The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Exhibit C, PUD Master Plan, depicts building areas with associated parking areas that provide internal circulation connecting the two access points.] Policy 7.3 All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [To the north is a road. All abutting parcels to the east, west and south are zoned "E" and each is developed with a single family dwelling. Given the abutting uses, existing development on 213 of the site, and proposed development plan (water management, preserve and septic system along the southern and western boundaries of undeveloped Tract 64), staff finds it not feasible or beneficial to provide interconnections.] CONCLUSION: Based upon the above analysis, the proposed PUD rezone may only be deemed consistent with the UGGE S-E of the GGAMP at such time as the companion GMP amendment petition (PL20180003708/CP-2019-2) is adopted and goes into effect. Note: The PUD Ordinance needs to provide for the effective date to be linked to the effective date of the companion GMP amendment petition. IN CITYVIEW cc: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager, Zoning Division Anita Jenkins, AICP, Community Planning Manager, Zoning Division PUDZ-PL20180003710 TempleShalomR4.dou 2 Packet Pg. 2190 17.B.6 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountvfl.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver For Petition Number(s): Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners PL20180003708 and PL20180003710 Regarding the above subject petition number(s), Temple Shalom, Inc. (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: Daryl Sissman as President Signatur ' ® Applicant ❑ Legal Counsel to Applicant Date: l J �zo -L0 * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. Packet Pg. 2191 17.B.8 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. I. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action N has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the d petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s E 0 NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED M NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED y PLANNER. m a E _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - 4) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE M 00 STATE OF FLORIDA c� COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED SHARON UMPENHOUR WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10,03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER NATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 3800 Via Del Rey STREET OR P.O. BOX Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this loth day of September , 2020, by Sharon Umpenhour, personally known to me and who &Wdid not take an oath. i `• Y� ` -, CABIN J. DWYER MY COMMISSION # GG 982367 P`•- May 2024 pp�������E�XPIRES: �{1�4, &nd-drbru rWl.uwmvbS My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Signature of No y Public Carin J. Dwyer Printed Name of Notary Public Rev, 3/4/2015 Packet Pg. 2192 a Packet Pg. 2193 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE(S) Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on November 10, 2020, commencing at 9:00 a.m., in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber, Third Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-06, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND MAP SERIES TO ADD THE TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A CHURCH OF UP TO 302 SEATS, A CHILD CARE FACILITY FOR UP TO 200 CHILDREN, AND ON TRACT 64 OF THE GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 28 SUBDIVISION UP TO 22,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMUNITY FACILITY USES, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTION AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 13.6E ACRES IS LOCATED AT 4630 PINE' RIDGE ROAD APPROXIMATELY 4000 FEET WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF PINE RIDGE ROAD AND COLLIER BOULEVARD IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL201800037081 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP'OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT TO A COMMUNITY FACILITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUP) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO ALLOW UP 22,000 SQUARE FEET OF CIVIC, SOCIAL AND RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION (NON -SANCTUARY USES) ON TRACT 64 AND A 302 SEAT SANCTUARY, A CHILD CARE FACILITY FOR UP TO 200 CHILDREN AND RELATED USES ON TRACTS 65 AND 88, AND UP TO AN AGGREGATE MAXIMUM OF 60,000 SQUARE FEET ON TRACTS 65 AND 88. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 4630 PINE RIDGE ROAD APPROXIMATELY 4000 FEET WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF PINE RIDGE ROAD AND COLLIER BOULEVARD, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 13.5t ACRES; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTION NOS. 89-213, 90-418, AND 93-290, RELATING TO A TEMPLE/CHURCH AND CHILD CARE USES, AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20180003710] N p Pine Ridge RD o J > m � tM m Project J Location Green BLVD All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE(S) will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL., between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth` Floor, Suite 401, Collier County Government Center, East Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division,Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to November10, 2020 will be read and considered at the public hearing. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colli Quntvfl cov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to _QeoffM&WmIIig@coIU@rQgUWI,a Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you area person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance., Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BURT L. SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) t N2-GC10513935-01 N ILO M -_ 06 M 00 0 M tM , 76 as a� C s V R r a Packet Pg. 2194 FinnTimothy From: Bel IowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 2:43 PM To: StrainMark; FinnTimothy Subject: RE: Jewish Federation New Home Hi Tim, Please see the correspondence concerning the subject petition. Thanks R" Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463, Fax: 239.252.6350 Cher Coxuvrty Exceeding expectations, every day! Tel/ us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http>s goo.ol/eXmvgT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:23 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Jewish Federaton New Home I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Under Florida Law, a-mai€ addresses are public records If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing From: Lenore Greenstein <lenoresue comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:19 PM To: sheapr11948@gmail.com; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <ischmitt@comcast.net>; pdearborn@iohnwood.net; HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; eastmath colliers.com; KarlFry <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov>; mis0821@aol.com aol.com Subject: Jewish Federaton New Home EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Jewish Federation to the CC Planning Commission. I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom'sproperty and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Here are just a few imprtant points: - The JFGN is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County representing over 2500 members. ❑ Its activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and Its current approved usage, and enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of this community. ❑ It is community asset that provides over $600,000 in grants annually to primarily local organizations, including some that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community, like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. It partners with other religious communities locally in programs like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue and runs the local "Shop with the Sheriff" program to provide Christmas gifts to lower income children. I sincerely hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community,but the Greater Naples community as well. I Thank you for your kind consideration to this most important matter. Sincerely yours, Lenore Greenstein Sent from my iPhone FinnTimoth From: BeliowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 2:48 PM To: FinnTimothy Subject: FW: Re -Zoning of Temple Shalom property FYI ,Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463: Fax: 239.252.6350 C'�o iifiler Cox�.ty Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at hops://goo.gl/eXjvaT. From: Strain Mark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:02 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@ col Iiercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Re -Zoning of Temple Shalom property I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Ma *l Under Florida Law, e-mal addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing, From: iaybweiss47@gmaii.com <jaybweiss47@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 20201:46 PM To: sheaprl948@gmail.com; Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.goy.; edwinfryerl@gmail.co; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <jschmitt@comcast.net>; dearborn 'ohnrwood.com; HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; eastmath@collierschools.com Subject: Re -Zoning of Temple Shalom property EXTERNAL EMAIL This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Planning Commission Members: As members of the Jewish community, we are involved in an effort to build a building to be known as The Jewish Federation of Collier County (JFCC) which would be located on property owned by Temple Shalom. In order to accomplish that we are seeking your support and approval, to make an alteration to the Golden Gate Master Plan . The Jewish Federation JFCC) is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County representing over 2500 members. Its activities are highly aligned with Temple Shalom and its and its current approved usage. Our goal is to enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of the community The Jewish Federation of Collier County (JFCC) is a community asset that provides over $600,000.00 in grants to primarily local organizations, including several that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community such as the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum as well as partnering with other religious communities locally like the Jewish -Catholic Dialogue and supporting the local Shop with the Sheriff's program to provide Christmas gift to lower income children. In light ❑f the current "hate" that is permeating our country, our state and our community, the Jewish Federation is vital as it provides another opportunity for people of all faiths, ethnicities, and color to meet with each other — as we all know that familiarity is one of the ways to break down prejudice. We hope that the commission will be forward thinking and help us in our mission. We hope that Collier County will grant this project the approvals needed, as it will benefit not only the local Jewish Community but all of Collier County as well. We appreciate your consideration of this matter Susan and Jay Weiss 180 7t" Avenue South 2 Naples, FL 34102 FinnTimothy From: BellowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 2:48 PM To: FinnTimothy Subject: FW: Jewish Federation Greater Naples Future Home PLEASE APPROVE! FYI R" Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 CiOeY COLLH'Cy Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eX'v_gT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:02 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bel lows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Jewish Federation Greater Naples Future Home PLEASE APPROVE! I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Mary Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Julie Hartline <ihartline@iewishnaples.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 20201:23 PM To: sheapr1948@gmail.com; KarlFry <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov>; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <ischmitt@comcast.net>; pdearborn@iohnrwood.com; HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; eastmath@collierschools.com Subject: Jewish Federation Greater Naples Future Home PLEASE APPROVE! EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Members of the Collier County Planning Commission: You all have an important and turning point decision to make on behalf of our Jewish Community regarding the land usage of Temple Shalom and the future home of the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples. I wish to express my strong support in favor! JFGN raises much needed grants in excess of $1,000,000,000 every year that supports our local beneficiary agencies, local community partners, overseas agencies and in Israel. Specifically, the Holocaust Museum, Naples Senior Center, CCSO-Shop with Sheriff, just to name a few. JFGN also supports the community during times of crisis providing food, supplies and funds for hurricane and natural disasters relief. As our area is continually growing, JFGN's current location and facility can no longer keep up with the increased population and interests to have meaningful cultural, educational, social service, humanitarian and charitable programs and fundraising events. Our Federation has over 3000+ participants and is increasing daily. During these times more than ever, we need hope for our Jewish Community's strength and future to continue our mission. Please VOTE YES for this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only our local Jewish Community, but the entire Greater Naples community as well. Your consideration is greatly appreciated and THANK YOU for all you do for our community. Stay safe and be well, Julie Hartline Annual Campaign Director Jewish Federation of Greater Naples 2500 Vanderbilt Beach Road, #2201 Naples, FL 34109 (2. ic�r���ish Ut-deratiorl OF GREATER NAPLES FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 2:50 PM To: FinnTimothy; FaulknerSue Subject: FW: Collier County Planning Commission FYI R" Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463,, Fax: 239.252.6350 coiifier coHnty Exceeding expectations, every day! Tel/ us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.al/eXjvq - From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:02 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows @colIiercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Collier County Planning Commission I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Mcwk, Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity_ Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: michael sobol <msobol99@Bmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 12:12 PM Cc: Marc 5aperstein <mis0821@aol.com> Subject: Collier County Planning Commission EXTERNAL EMV. This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Arlene and I are legal residents of Florida, and have owned in Naples for 25 years. We strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. We are on the Board of Directors of the Jewish Federation as well as members of Temple Shalom. Both organizations provide many cultural, educational, civic and social events in this area. The Jewish community is growing in Collier County and as such is in need of a new facility t❑ house these types of events. We hope you will support the effort to utilize the parcel of land adjacent to Temple Shalom for the new Federation building, Thank you for your efforts on behalf of Collier County. Michael & Arlene Sobol FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 2:51 PM To: FinnTimothy; FaulknerSue Subject: FW: Collier County Planning Commission - Application to modify the Golden Gate Master Plan R" Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Co lie-r County Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by faking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/e ivgT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:02 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Collier County Planning Commission - Application to modify the Golden Gate Master Plan I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Mari Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request. do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing From: Paula Filler < aula filler mail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 12:10 PM To: shea r1948 mail.com; KarlFry <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fr er colliercount fl. ov>; *schmitt comast.net; dearborn 'ohnrwood.cam; HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; eastmath@collierschools.com Subject: Collier County Planning Commission - Application to modify the Golden Gate Master Plan EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. June 3, 2020 Dear Member of the Collier County Planning Commission: My husband and I are full time residents of Collier County. We sincerely appreciate your time and effort on the projects which come before the Planning Commission. With the enormous growth in Collier County we understand that your role is very time consuming and demanding. I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan. The proposed change would allow Jewish Federation to build a new home on the property owned by Temple Shalom. We believe that by sharing the same campus, the synergies created will enable both organizations to increase our positive contributions for all Collier county residents and expand what we already do for the cultural, educational and humanitarian needs of our residents. Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN) is a not -for -profit charitable organization which has more than a 20 year track record in Naples. JFGN provides cultural, educational and humanitarian programs for Naples and the larger Collier County community. • Jewish Federation of Greater Naples conducts programs and initiatives which complement those of Temple Shalom. • Temple Shalom current planning commission approved usage is to enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, and humanitarian and social service needs of our community. • Jewish Federation of Greater Naples provides over $600,000 in grants annually to primarily local organizations that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community. Examples of the organizations we support include: Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. • JFGN partners with other local religious Congregations to jointly sponsor and conduct programs which fight bigotry and racism and promote religious tolerance. An example is Jewish -Catholic dialogue. • Annually JFGN provides a grant to local charitable organizations which address human needs. Recently our humanitarian awards include grants to such organizations as: Bedz for Kids and Laces of Love. • JFGN sponsors a program "Shop with the Sheriff" which provides Christmas gifts to lower income children and helps build positive relationships between the Collier County Sheriff's Department and children at risk. We hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Paula Filler 12449 Lockford Lane Naples, FL 34120 Paula PFiller maiLcom 973-493-6977 FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 2:52 PM To: FinnTimothy; FaulknerSue Subject: FW: Letter of Support for Approval of JFGN Building Plan on Temple Shalom Property FYI Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvgT. -----Original Message ----- From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:01 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@col liercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Letter of Support for Approval of JFGN Building Plan on Temple Shalom Property I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Mark Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. -----Original Message ----- From: karen deutsch <psychickaren@icloud.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 11:52 AM To: KarlFry <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov>; sheapr1948@gmail.com; FryerEdwin < Edwin. Fryer@ colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <jschmitt@comcast.net>; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Marc Saperstein <mjs0821@aol.com> Subject: Letter of Support for Approval of JFGN Building Plan on Temple Shalom Property EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Planning Commission Members, I am writing to advise you of my very strong support for the efforts between Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples seeking approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan of Temple Shalom's property that will permit the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to build it's new home on the campus of Temple Shalom. The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community, and offers a myriad of services and programs to the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island, and Lower Lee County which represents over 2500 members. The JFGN offers activities that are highly complementary to those of Temple Shalom and its current approved usage, and as such, follow similar and complimentary missions of enhancing and enriching the quality of Jewish life through the support of charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs throughout this community. A campus atmosphere would certainly enhance communication and program sustainability. The JFGN is a vital and important asset to this community that provides over $600,000 annually in grants to primarily local organizations, some of which serve both our Jewish and non-Jewish community, like The Naples Senior Center, the Holocaust Museum and our Jewish Pre -School centers. In addition, we also partner with multi religious communities locally in the Jewish -Catholic Dialogue Program, and running the local, highly popular and successful "Shop with the Sheriff" program providing Christmas gifts to lower income children. I sincerely hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples Community as well. Thank you for your Consideration to this very important matter, Karen Deutsch Sent from my iPad June 3. 2020 Dear Sir, The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN) and Temple Shalom are seeking approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow the JFGN to build a much -needed facility on Temple Shalom's campus. I sincerely hope that this change will be approved as it will be beneficial to bothTemple Shalom and the JFGN. Over the years, the JFGN has grown to over 2500 members and serves a vital function in the lives of its members, who include members of Temple Shalom. Having a home in this location will benefit everyone involved. Since moving to the Naples area over 16 years ago, I have been involved with the Jewish Federation as an active volunteer in several capacities. This organization provides over $600,000 annually to primarily local organizations that serve both Jewish and non-Jewish residents. It is through my volunteer work that f have truly felt myself to be a part of the greater Naples community. The Federation cooperates with many community organizations to provide support to feed those in need. supply Senior services, support education and many other philanthropic groups. The Community Relations Council of the Federation yearly makes cash awards to outstanding non-profit groups serving the community (Human Needs Award) and the Stand Up for Justice educator award. Having a permanent home in such a perfect location, will greatly enhance the ability of the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to fulfill its mission of improving the quality of life in our community. Your support for the needed change to the Master Plan will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely Yours, Betty Schwartz FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 2:57 PM To: FinnTimothy; FaulknerSue Subject: FW: Regarding rezoning of Temple Sha{om Property FYI R14 Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Co der County Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by faking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvaT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:01 PM To: BellowsRay<Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfI.gov> Subject: FW: Regarding rezoning of Temple Shalom Property I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Marls Under F- orida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Bogo Rosalee <rosiebogo@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 10:45 AM To: sheapr1948@@gmaii.com; KarlFry <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov>; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain colliercoun# fl. ov>; Joseph Schmitt <jschmitt@comcast.net>; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; eastmath@collierschools.com Cc: mare saperstein <mjs8212gmail.com> Subject: Regarding rezoning of Temple Shalom Property EXTERNAL EMAIL. This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Members of the Collier County Planning Commission, i would like to extend my strong support to the efforts of Temple Shalom and The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to receive the approval of a change in the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property. With this change, the Jewish Federation would be allowed to build it's new home on Temple Shalom's property. The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples represents over 2500 members who live in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County. By working together with Temple Shalom when needed, Jewish life will be enhanced and enriched as they both support charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of our community. The Jewish Federation provides over $600,000 in grants annually to local organizations that serve the Jewish and non Jewish community. Two examples are The Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum and Cohen Education Center. The Catholic Jewish Dialogue program of the Federation partners with other religious communities locally. The annual program "Shop With the Sheriff" provides Christmas gifts to lower income children. The Federation is a community building organization. If the Planning commission will grant the approval of this project , it is my belief the Jewish Community and the Greater Naples community will both benefit. Thank you for your consideration of this request, and best of luck to you on your future endeavors to better our community. Yours truly, Rosalee Bogo 2 u b by o June 2, 2020 Dear Members of the Collier County Planning Commission, I am pleased to submit a letter of support to the Collier County Planning Commission representing the B'nai B'rith Youth Organization (BBYO) on behalf of the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples and Temple Shalom as they seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's campus. The proposed project represents the commitment of these two institutions to the kind of partnership and collaboration necessary to build strong community. For almost a decade, BBYO has been a beneficiary of this partnership as we seek to reach and inspire Jewish teens in Collier County. Each year BBYO brings together over 70 teens who engage in leadership development programs, community service initiatives and ritual activities that bring them closer to their Jewish faith. Both the Jewish Federation and Temple Shalom have generously nurtured our program, providing financial and volunteer support. We are thrilled that they have designated activity space for us as part of their proposed campus. As BBYO's global CEO based in Washington, DC, I offer this letter of support enthusiastically and personally. Through visits to Naples over the years, I have gotten to know many of the leaders involved in this project. They represent some of the finest people I know who now serve as role models to many of the young people who come through BBYO's program. I know that the incredible campus they are proposing represents so much of what they stand for as leaders, community builders and citizens of Collier County. As honored as I am to have BBYO hosted on this campus, I am just as proud that the individuals responsible for this project are influencing the lives of our young people. Thank you for considering this proposed rezoning. By accepting this request, you will allow two extraordinary partners to establish a home base that will not only benefit the young lives BBYO seeks to inspire, but that Naples community at -large. Sincerely, Matthew Grossman Chief Executive Officer '".Y ! c Dear Collier County Planning Commission, T H E ALEX & CAROL GLASSMAN CHABAD NAPLES ,NEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER I am writing this letter in strong support of the efforts of the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. As the rabbi and director of the Chabad of Naples organization, I have had the privilege of collaborating with the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples over the past 16 years. The Federation is a critical organization in the Naples Jewish community and greater Naples community, and their services benefit thousands. As the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County, they directly represent over 2500 members and their activities enrich the quality of life for so many in our community. Chabad of Naples is just one of the many organizations that benefits from the over $600,000 in grants that the Jewish Federation distributes annually to primarily local organizations. Their support allows us to continue offering critical services in the areas of educational, spiritual and social life to our constituents. It is my belief that the Jewish Federation's activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and its current approved usage. Allowing the Federation to build an enhanced facility on the Temple Shalom's campus will only enhance their ability to provide educational, humanitarian and social services to the Naples community. I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Sincererr "- Rabbi Fishel Za los Chabad Naples Community Center • 1789 Mandarin Road • Naples, Florida 34102 T: 239-262-4474 E: info@chabadnapies.com W: www.chabadnaples.com From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Fwd: Collier County Planning Commission June 11 meeting, Letter in support of GoldenGate Master Plan for Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Collier country Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:23:12 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Elaine Soffer <esoffer0921@comcast.net> Subject: Collier County Planning Commission June 11 meeting, Letter in support of GoldenGate Master Plan for Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Collier country Date: June 2, 2020 at 10:29:57 PM EDT To: sheapr1948(a-),gmail.com, Karl. FryO)colliergov.net, edwinfryer cnio colliergov.net, markstrain cnio collieraovnet, jschmitt(a)comcast.net, pdearborn(a-)johnrwood.com, karenhomiak(@colliergov.net, eastmath@collierschools.com Cc: Karl. Fry(@colliercountyfl.gov Reply -To: Elaine Soffer <esoffer0921 (@comcast. net> Elaine Soffer 3899 Valentia Way Naples, FI 34119 June 3, 2020 Dear Collier County Planning Commission Members, I enthusiastically give my full support to the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater (JFGN) to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. The JFGN is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island, and Lower Lee County representing over 2500 members. Its activities are highly complementary with those of Temple Shalom and Its current approved usage and enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian, and social service needs of this community. As the President of the Women's Cultural Alliance (WCA), a JFGN affinity group, and it is entirely run by volunteers. WCA is both non -partisan and non-sectarian and welcomes women of all faiths. The approval of a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan to allow the JFGN build its new home on the Temple Shalom campus would mean a significant and positive change to the types and numbers of programs available on a regular basis to this group of women who share similar interests to participate in cultural, educational and social events. As a community asset, the JFGN provides over $600,000 in grants annually to primarily local organizations, including some that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community, like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. It partners with other religious communities locally in programs like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue and runs the local "Shop with the Sheriff' program to provide Christmas gifts to lower -income children. I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Elaine F. Soffer WCA President From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Fwd: Collier County Planning Commission Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:24:47 PM Begin forwarded message: From: michael sobol <msobol99a-grnail.com> Subject: Collier County Planning Commission Date: June 3, 2020 at 12.12.19 PM EDT Cc: Marc Saperstein <m4s0821 @aol.com> Arlene and I are legal residents of Florida, and have owned in Naples for 25 years. We strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. We are on the Board of Directors of the Jewish Federation as well as members of Temple Shalom. Both organizations provide many cultural, educational, civic and social events in this area. The Jewish community is growing in Collier County and as such is in need of a new facility to house these types of events. We hope you will support the effort to utilize the parcel of land adjacent to Temple Shalom for the new Federation building. Thank you for your efforts on behalf of Collier County. Michael & Arlene Sobol From: mart saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Emailed sent Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:28:07 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Renee Bialek <rbialek(a)jewishnaples.org> Subject: Emailed sent Date: June 3, 2020 at 3:01.50 PM EDT To: "mis0821 Qaol.corn" <mjs0821(@..aol.com> Cc: Jeffrey Feld <ifeld(@.'ewishnaples.org> I sent the below from my personal email address. Dear Commissioner, I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (the "Jewish Federation") to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. The Jewish Federation is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County representing over 2500 members. The Jewish Federation will greatly enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of this community. The Jewish Federation is community asset that provides over $600,000 in grants annually to primarily local organizations, including some that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community, like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Renee' Bialek From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: FYI - Request for your help Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:22:37 PM Attachments: Collier Cty Planning Comm 7-2-20.dooc Planning Comm support SR 7-2-20.doa Begin forwarded message: From: Jack Rabin <iack.rabin(aa�.att.net> Subject: Re: FYI - Request for your help Date: June 2, 2020 at 9:20:55 PM EDT To: marc saperstein <mjs821�a��maiLcom> My copy attached. Susan added her comments. Do you want her letter sent also? From: marc saperstein <m6s821(@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 at 8:33 PM To: Jack Rabin <iack.rabinPatt.net> Subject: Fwd: FYI - Request for your help Jack at the Ed bottom of the emails are the talking points Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Deborah Fidel <dfidel(@na lep stem Ip e.org> Date: June 2, 2020 at 5:04:31 PM EDT To: marc saperstein <mis821(@gmail.com> Subject: FYI - Request for your help Begin forwarded message: From: DEBORAH FIDEL <dfidelPna lep stem Ip e.org> Subject: Request for your help Date: June 2, 2020 at 5:03:59 PM EDT To: Daryl Sissman <dsissman(@gmail.com>, Edward Kaufman <esk(@kdicorp com>, Merrill Hassenfeld <hassenfeld(@mac.com>, Robin Mintz <mintzmom@gmail.com>, Susan Hager <susan.k.hagerPgmail.com>, Susan Ritter <susanritter11(@gmail.com>, Stephen Pino <stevepharm63Pyahoo.com>, John Little <johnlittle64(@aol.com>, Adam Miller <amiller(@na lep stem Ip e org>, Donna Azu <dazu(@na lep stem le.org>, Edward Alexander <Edarchitect.ea(@Rmail.com>, Ellen Goldberg <Lnatlarge(@hotmail.com>, Andrew Karpman <andy.kar m�gmail.com>, Jack Rabin <jack.rabin(@att.net>, Karen Cohn <kcohnrdh(@gmail.com>, Ron Yasbin <ryasbin(@alumni.psu.edu>, Debra Antzis <dgantzis(@Email.com>, Susan Feld <sfeld(@na lep sterr Ida eorg>, Helen Weinfeld <helenweinfeld(@aol.com>, Ariel Boxman <aboxmani@na lestemple.org>, Michael Feldman <MichaelFNa Ip es(@gmail.com>, Joshua Garfield <jgarfield(d)me.com>, Eugene Katz <gbkatz58O4(@aol.com>, David Citrin <David.citrinC@comcast.net>, estelle Price <esprice(@comcast.net>, Deborah Fidel <dfidel(@na lep stem Ip e org> Dear Board Members, The first public meeting about the new Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN) building will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission on June 11. Our friends at the JFGN need us to please send a letter of support in favor of the Re -Zoning of the Temple Shalom property, which will allow Federation to build its new home on our land. Attached, you will find talking points that may be of help to you in writing this letter of support. Also attached, you will find the names and contact information of the Collier County Planning Commission members. We apologize for the short time frame. but theseletters must be sent to the Collier County Planning Commission members by end of business. tomorrow - Wednesday, June 30. 2020. Marc Saperstein, our member and the coordinator of this effort for JFGN requests that you cc him at (mis0821(@aol.com) on the letters that you send to the CCPC. On behalf of everyone involved in this important project, thank you for your help and support! L'Shalom, Deborah R Fidel Executive Director dfidel(&na le0 stem l�e.org Phone: 239.455.3030 www.n estemnle.org Karl. Frti@colliercountyfl. gov Mr. Karl Fry c/o Collier County Planning Commission Dear Mr. Fry: Temple Shalom has been active in social justice activities over its past 30 plus years in the greater Naples community. Its caring 780 member families and clergy have provided food to this community, and safety and shelter during Hurricane Irma though the use of its facilities and its building. Among those facilities are its pre-school program that primarily services the non-Jewish community. The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples has an opportunity to join us on our campus that includes a vacant parcel of land we have owned over the past 30 years and would enable us to continue to provide complimentary services through our shared membership. It is our fondest hope that Collier County will grant approval to this joint project as it will benefit both the Jewish and the Greater Naples community. Thank you for cooperation and consideration. Respectfully, Jack Rabin, Member of the Board of Trustees Karl. Fry(@colliercountA. gov Mr. Karl Fry c/o Collier County Planning Commission Dear Mr. Fry: I have lived in Collier County for five years and appreciate all the services offered by the community. Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples have both added to my positive life and activities here in Naples, and I have seen how both have contributed greatly to Collier County. During Hurricane Irma, the Temple opened its doors to its neighbors by providing food, safety and shelter at a critical time demonstrating its concern for the community and the people living in Collier County. Temple Shalom has contributed to the Greater Naples community in many other ways for over 30 years. Temple Shalom runs a much needed and highly regarded community pre-school that primarily serves the non-Jewish community. The Temple also serves 780 member families. Temple Shalom has owned the vacant parcel of land on its campus for over 30 years and has anticipated future growth in services for the growing number of Jewish families in our community. To accomplish this plan, it has offered the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples the opportunity to join them on its campus sharing facilities and parking. Jewish Federation has very complementary activities and membership. I sincerely hope that Collier County will approve this project. I believe the project will greatly benefit the Greater Naples community as well as the local Jewish Community. Thank you for your consideration and approval for this. Sincerely, Susan Rabin Temple Member From: marc swerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:28:49 PM Attachments: GGMP.odf Begin forwarded message: From: Chabad Naples <rabbi C&,chabadnaples.com> Subject: Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property Date: June 3, 2020 at 3:12:50 PM EDT To: "eastmath a.collierschools.com" <eastmathaa.collierschools.com> Cc: "mjs0821paol.com" <mjs0821 car.aols m> Dear Mr. Thomas G. Eastman I am writing the attached letter in strong support of the efforts of the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Rabbi Fishel Zaklos C() Dear Collier County Planning Commission, THE ALEX S CAROL GLASSMAN CHABAQ NAPLES JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER I am writing this letter in strong support of the efforts of the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. As the rabbi and director of the Chabad of Naples organization, I have had the privilege of collaborating with the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples over the past 16 years. The Federation is a critical organization in the Naples Jewish community and greater Naples community, and their services benefit thousands. As the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and tower Lee County, they directly represent over 2500 members and their activities enrich the quality of life for so many in our community. Chabad of Naples isjust one of the many organizations that benefits from the over $600,000 in grants that the Jewish Federation distributes annually to primarily local organizations. Their support allows us to continue offering critical services in the areas of educational, spiritual and social life to our constituents. It is my belief that the Jewish Federation's activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and its current approved usage. Allowing the Federation to build an enhanced facility on the Temple Shalom's campus will only enhance their ability to provide educational, humanitarian and social services to the Naples community. I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Sincere) Rabbi Fishel Za los Chabad Naples Community Center • 1789 Mandarin Road • Naples, Florida 34102 T: 239-262-4474 E: info@chabadnaples.com W: www.chabadnaples.com From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Um ep nhour Subject: Fwd: Golden Gate Master Plan Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:20:30 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Andy Karpman <andy.karpman(@gmail.com> Subject: Golden Gate Master Plan Date: June 2, 2020 at 6.14.50 PM EDT To: Karl. Frya-colliercountyfl.aov Cc: mJs0821(Waol.com Dear Sir: We strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Please note the following Temple Shalom has been a positive asset to the Greater Naples community and a good neighbor for over 30 years. The temple serves 780 member families and has a well -regarded and much needed community pre-school that primarily serves the non-Jewish community. It has offered the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples, which has very complementary activities and membership, the opportunity to join them on its campus sharing expanded parking and facilities. Temple Shalom has owned the vacant parcel for 30 years with anticipation for future growth of services to provide for the growing number of Jewish families in our community. During Hurricane Irma, Temple opened its doors to its neighbors for food, safety and shelter further demonstrating its community citizenship. We hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Andy & Di Karpman North Naples From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Golden Gate Master Plan Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:20:38 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Andy Karpman <andy.kar mana_gmail.com> Subject: Golden Gate Master Plan Date: June 2, 2020 at 6:19:45 PM EDT To: shea r1948 am_.., ail.com Cc: mis821 a-amail.com Dear Mr. Shea: We strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Please note the following Temple Shalom has been a positive asset to the Greater Naples community and a good neighbor for over 30 years. The temple serves 780 member families and has a well -regarded and much needed community pre-school that primarily serves the non-Jewish community. It has offered the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples, which has very complementary activities and membership, the opportunity to join them on its campus sharing expanded parking and facilities. Temple Shalom has owned the vacant parcel for 30 years with anticipation for future growth of services to provide for the growing number of Jewish families in our community. During Hurricane Irma, Temple opened its doors to its neighbors for food, safety and shelter further demonstrating its community citizenship. We hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Andy & Di Karpman North Naples From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Golden Gate Master Plan Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:21:02 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Andy Karpman <andy.karpman _gmail.com> Subject: Golden Gate Master Plan Date: June 2, 2020 at 6:30:20 PM EDT To: i�chmittCa�comcast.net Cc: mis821 Qa gmail.com Dear Mr. Schmitt We strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Please note the following Temple Shalom has been a positive asset to the Greater Naples community and a good neighbor for over 30 years. The temple serves 780 member families and has a well -regarded and much needed community pre-school that primarily serves the non-Jewish community. It has offered the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples, which has very complementary activities and membership, the opportunity to join them on its campus sharing expanded parking and facilities. Temple Shalom has owned the vacant parcel for 30 years with anticipation for future growth of services to provide for the growing number of Jewish families in our community. During Hurricane Irma, Temple opened its doors to its neighbors for food, safety and shelter further demonstrating its community citizenship. We hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Andy & Di Karpman North Naples From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: In support of Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to Golden Gate Master Plan Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:25:06 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Joshua Garfield <LAarfieldCc7me.com> Subject: In support of Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to Golden Gate Master Plan Date: June 3, 2020 at 1.08:49 PM EDT To: Karl. Fry@colliercountyfl.gov Cc: m_s0821 CcDaol.com, dfidel naplestem le.org To the Collier County Planning Commission: I am writing to you in strong support of the efforts brought forth by Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples in seeking approval to change the Golden Gate Master Plan in relation to Temple Shalom's property to allow for the Jewish Federation of build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Below are points of consideration: * Temple Shalom has been a part of the community serving as an asset for over 30 years. * There are currently 780 members and families that congregate in worship and learning. * Temple Shalom has a well -regarded pre-school that serves the entire community, not just those of the jewish faith. * Offered the Jewish Federation of Grater Naples the opportunity to join on its campus by sharing facilities and expanded parking for its activities and members. * Temple Shalom has opened its doors to the neighbors in times of need for food, safety, and shelter such as seen during Hurricane Irma demonstrating the efforts made toward community and citizenship in Collier County. * Temple Shalom has owned the vacant parcel for 30 years in anticipation of future of services to provide for the growing number of Jewish families in our community. I'm hopeful that Collier County will grant approval for this project as it benefits not only the Jewish Community, but all of Greater Naples. Thanks you for your consideration, Josh Garfield From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umcenhour Subject: Fwd: Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:19:53 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Arthur Seigel <amseigel@_grnail.com> Subject: Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Date: June 2, 2020 at 4.56.58 PM EDT To: mis0821 O)aol.com, Feld Jeffrey Jeffrey <Jfeld@.6ewishnaples.org> Hi Marc, As one of the leaders of our Jewish Community, I fully support the plans to rezone the Temple Shalom land to accommodate an independent home for the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples. The Federation supports so much of the cultural life of our community in addition to unifying the represented congregations. It would be a very unfortunate loss of opportunity otherwise. Please forward my comments to the interested parties. Arthur M Seigel, MD From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:23:58 PM Begin forwarded message: From: "Elliot Lerner" <edlcpaa-comcast.net> Subject: Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Date: June 3, 2020 at 9:30:30 AM EDT To: <Karl.F[ya_colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: "'marc saperstein"' <mjs821 Q_amail.com> Dear Commissioner Fry, As you are no doubt aware, the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples ("JFGN") is seeking a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan which would allow the construction of a building that will better serve its needs. That building would rest on property owned by Temple Shalom, located on the eastern portion of Pine Ridge Road. JFGN is a 2,500-member not -for -profit organization which serves the needs of the Jewish community of Collier County and southern Lee County, bringing humanitarian and social service support to those in need through grants to other qualified local organizations. Some of those organizations serve the non-Jewish community as well, such as the Naples Senior Center. In addition, JFGN serves as a grant agency, similar to United Way, to support the activities of other organizations in greater Collier County which are focused on charitable and educational activities which enhance and enrich the Jewish community and the community -at -large in our area. To that end, JFGN's annual grant allocations historically exceed $600,000. In the interest of the people of our community who are selflessly served by JFGN, it is respectfully requested that you, and the Planning Commission as a whole, approve JFGN's application to modify the aforementioned Master Plan. With kindest regards, Elliot D. Lerner 313 Steerforth Court Naples, FL 34110 (239)221-3145 (603)494-9062 (Mobile) edlcpaPcomcast.net From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Jewish Federaton New Home Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:26:42 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Lenore Greenstein <lenoresuena comcast.net> Subject: Jewish Federaton New Home Date: June 3, 2020 at 2:18:36 PM EDT To: sheapr11948 agmail.com, edwinfryer(@colliergov.net, markstrain@colliergov.net, ischmittcomcast.net, pdearborn@johnwood.net, karenhomiakacolliergov.net, eastmatha_colliers.com, karl.frya-colliercountyfl.gov, mjs0821 vao1.corn Jewish Federation to the CC Planning Commission I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom'sproperty and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Here are just a few imprtant points: • The JFGN is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County representing over 2500 members. • Its activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and Its current approved usage, and enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of this community. • It is community asset that provides over $600,000 in grants annually to primarily local organizations, including some that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community, like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. • It partners with other religious communities locally in programs like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue and runs the local "Shop with the Sheriff' program to provide Christmas gifts to lower income children. I sincerely hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community,but the Greater Naples community as well. I Thank you for your kind consideration to this most important matter. Sincerely yours, Lenore Greenstein Sent from my Whone From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Fwd: Letter of Support for Approval of JFGN Building Plan on Temple Shalom Property Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:25:27 PM Begin forwarded message: From: karen deutsch <psychickarenC@icloud.com> Subject: Letter of Support for Approval of JFGN Building Plan on Temple Shalom Property Date: June 3, 2020 at 11:52.10 AM EDT To: Karl. FryC@colliercountyfl.gov, sheapr1948 o amail.com, edwinfryer6d)colliergov.net, markstrainCcDcolliergov.net, a schmittecomcast.net, pdearbornCc johnrwood.com, karenhomiak(@colliergov.net Cc: Marc Saperstein <m-is0821 O)aol.com> Dear Collier County Planning Commission Members, I am writing to advise you of my very strong support for the efforts between Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples seeking approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan of Temple Shalom's property that will permit the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to build it's new home on the campus of Temple Shalom. The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community, and offers a myriad of services and programs to the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island, and Lower Lee County which represents over 2500 members. The JFGN offers activities that are highly complementary to those of Temple Shalom and its current approved usage, and as such, follow similar and complimentary missions of enhancing and enriching the quality of Jewish life through the support of charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs throughout this community. A campus atmosphere would certainly enhance communication and program sustainability. The JFGN is a vital and important asset to this community that provides over $600,000 annually in grants to primarily local organizations, some of which serve both our Jewish and non-Jewish community, like The Naples Senior Center, the Holocaust Museum and our Jewish Pre -School centers. In addition, we also partner with multi religious communities locally in the Jewish -Catholic Dialogue Program, and running the local, highly popular and successful "Shop with the Sheriff' program providing Christmas gifts to lower income children. I sincerely hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples Community as well. Thank you for your Consideration to this very important matter, Karen Deutsch Sent from my Wad From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Letter to Planning Commission Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:23:38 PM Attachments: Blank 4.odf Begin forwarded message: From: Betty Schwartz <bett.ofhaples mail.com> Subject: Letter to Planning Commission Date: June 3, 2020 at 7:30:48 AM EDT To: Marc Saperstein < is0821 aol.com> Betty Schwartz 239-354-8556 home 239-287-5789 mobile Dear Sir, The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN) and Temple Shalom are seeking approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow the JFGN to build a much -needed facility on Temple Shalom's campus. I sincerely hope that this change will be approved as it will be beneficial to bothTemple Shalom and the JFGN. Over the years, the JFGN has grown to over 2500 members and serves a vital function in the lives of its members, who include members of Temple Shalom. Having a home in this location will benefit everyone involved. Since moving to the Naples area over 16 years ago, I have been involved with the Jewish Federation as an active volunteer in several capacities. This organization provides over $600,000 annually to primarily local organizations that sere both Jewish and non-Jewish residents. It is through my volunteer work that I have truly felt myself to be a part of the greater Naples community. The Federation cooperates with many community organizations to provide support to feed those in need, supply Senior services, support education and many other philanthropic groups. The Community Relations Council of the Federation yearly makes cash awards to outstanding non-profit groups serving the community (Human Needs Award) and the Stand Up for Justice educator award. Having a permanent home in such a perfect location, will greatly enhance the ability of the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to fulfill its mission of improving the quality of life in our community. Your support for the needed change to the Master Plan will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely Yours, Betty Schwartz From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Project approval for the Jewish Federation Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:24:10 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Stephen Satz <ssatz o aol.com> Subject: Project approval for the Jewish Federation Date: June 3, 2020 at 9:33:44 AM EDT To: "mjs0821(a aol.corn" <mjs0821(a)aol.corn>, "sheapr19480a_gmail.com" <sheaPr1948 d)pmail.com>, "Karl. FryQcolliercountyfl.gov" <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov>, "edwinfrver@colliergov.net" <edwinfryerQcolliergov.net>, "markstraine-colliergov.net" <markstrain(aDcolliergov.net>, "jschmittCa)comast. net" <ischmitt( .comast.net>, "pdearbornnao johnrwood.com" <pdearborn(a)* ohnrwood.com>, "karenhomiakCaDcolliergov.net" <karenhomiak d colliergov.net>, "eastmathCa- collierschools.com" <eastmathna collierschools.com> Reply -To: Stephen Satz <ssatzCabaol.com> I write to you in hopes that you will see the merits in granting approval to change the Golden Gate Master Plan to allow for the building of the Jewish Federation's new home on the Temple Shalom's campus. . This change would not only serve the Jewish community but the Greater Naples community as well. . It is an organization that provides over $600,000.00 in grants annually to local organizations - that include both Jewish and Non -Jewish causes. . It partners with other religious communities locally - like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue and runs the local "Shop with the Sheriff programs to provide gifts for lower income children. . The Jewish Federation oversees the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County which includes over 2500 members It's activities compliment Temple Shalom and it's current approved usage and it enhances the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of this community. sincerely appreciate your time and effort in reviewing this matter and I hope that you will grant this project approval. It will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community but the Greater Naples Community as well. Thank you, Jamie Satz Jami3154Qaol,com 609.402.2201 From: m_arc saoerstein To: Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Fwd: Regarding rezoning of Temple Shalom Property Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:24:21 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Bogo Rosalee <rosiebogoQgmail. com> Subject: Regarding rezoning of Temple Shalom Property Date: June 3, 2020 at 10:44:59 AM EDT To: sheapr1948a-gmail.com, Karl. Fry(d)colliercountyfl.gov, edwinfryer(@colliergov.net, markstrain(@colliergov.net, 0schmittecomcast.net, pdearbornQ6ohnrwood.com, karenhomiak c-colliergov.net, eastmatha-collierschools.com Cc: marc saperstein <mjs821 (a-)-gmail.com> Dear Members of the Collier County Planning Commission, i would like to extend my strong support to the efforts of Temple Shalom and The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to receive the approval of a change in the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property. With this change, the Jewish Federation would be allowed to build it's new home on Temple Shalom's property. The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples represents over 2500 members who live in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County. By working together with Temple Shalom when needed, Jewish life will be enhanced and enriched as they both support charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of our community. The Jewish Federation provides over $600,000 in grants annually to local organizations that serve the Jewish and non Jewish community. Two examples are The Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum and Cohen Education Center. The Catholic Jewish Dialogue program of the Federation partners with other religious communities locally. The annual program "Shop With the Sheriff' provides Christmas gifts to lower income children. The Federation is a community building organization. If the Planning commission will grant the approval of this project, it is my belief the Jewish Community and the Greater Naples community will both benefit. Thank you for your consideration of this request, and best of luck to you on your future endeavors to better our community. Yours truly, Rosalee Bogo From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Re -Zoning of Temple Shalom property Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:26:30 PM Begin forwarded message: From: <jaybweiss47�a�gmail.com> Subject: FW: Re -Zoning of Temple Shalom property Date: June 3, 2020 at 1.48.54 PM EDT To: "'marc saperstein"' <mjs821(d).gmail.com> Here is what wed sent From: javbweiss47CEDgmail.com <iavbweiss47(@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 1:46 PM To: sheapr1948Pgmail.com; Karl.Fry(@colliercountyfl.gov.; edwinfryerl(@gmail.co; markstrain(@colliergov.net; ischmitt(@comcast.net; pdearborn(@'ohnrwood.com; karenhomiak(@collierp-ov_.net: eastmath(@collierschools.com Subject: Re -Zoning of Temple Shalom property Dear Collier County Planning Commission Members: As members of the Jewish community, we are involved in an effort to build a building to be known as The Jewish Federation of Collier County (JFCC) which would be located on property owned by Temple Shalom. In order to accomplish that we are seeking your support and approval, to make an alteration to the Golden Gate Master Plan . The Jewish Federation JFCC) is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County representing over 2500 members. Its activities are highly aligned with Temple Shalom and its and its current approved usage. Our goal is to enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of the community The Jewish Federation of Collier County (JFCC) is a community asset that provides over $600,000.00 in grants to primarily local organizations, including several that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community such as the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum as well as partnering with other religious communities locally like the Jewish -Catholic ❑ialogue and supporting the local Shop with the Sheriff's program to provide Christmas gift to lower income children. In light of the current "hate" that is permeating our country, our state and our community, the Jewish Federation is vital as it provides another opportunity for people ❑f all faiths, ethnicities, and color to meet with each other --aswe all know that familiarity is one of the ways to break down prejudice. We hope that the commission will be forward thinking and help us in our mission. We hope that Collier County will grant this project the approvals needed, as it will benefit not only the local Jewish Community but all of Collier County as well. We appreciate your consideration of this matter Susan and Jay Weiss 180 7th Avenue South Naples, FL 34102 From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Re -Zoning of the Temple Shalom Property Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:20:19 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Les Nizin <mcanaplespresident(-)gmail.com> Subject: Re -Zoning of the Temple Shalom Property Date: June 2, 2020 at 6:04:18 PM EDT To: sheapr1948 anammail.com, edwinf)tere-gmail.com, markstraina-colliergov.net, ischmittCc comcast.net, pdearborn(a)johnrwood.com, karenhomiak&colliergov.net, eastmath@collierschools.net, Karl. Fryaico colliercountyfl.gov Dear Members of the Collier County Planning Commission: I understand that the Planning Commission will be considering on June 11, 2020, an application to re -zone the Temple Shalom property, (This requires a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan) in order to allow, and permit the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to build a new home to accommodate the many activities of both the Federation, the Temple, as well as other community groups that may wish to use the facility. The JFGN, is an umbrella organization, for the Men's Cultural Alliance of Greater Naples, commonly referred to as the MCA. Under the leadership of the JFGN, the MCA, became a reality seven years ago, and now has over 750.members, from Naples, Marco Island, and the the lower Lee County. Many of our members, are members of Temple Shalom and the Mca, uses the facilities of the Temple, in order to accommodate some of our, events in which there are 300, or more in attendance. In addition the Federation is a wonderful, supportive partner to many local civic organizations. The community at large, as well as the members of the Mca, and the Federation, would greatly benefit if the Federation would be permitted to build its' new facility on the Temples campus. I thank you, for your kind consideration, personally, and on behalf of the Mca's 750 plus members. Les Nizin President of the Mca. From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Um enhour Subject: Fwd: Rezoning Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:28:58 PM Begin forwarded message: From: LESLIE WASSERMAN <Ieshbrna aol.com> Subject: Rezoning Date: June 3, 2020 at 3.16.22 PM EDT To: mjs821(o-)gmail.com Hello Gentlemen, I am writing you to support the rezoning of Temple Shalom's property to include Jewish Federation of Greater Naples on its campus. I am an active member of both the Temple and JFGN.Many of our programs overlap.For example as the co-chair of Catholic-JewishDialogue we depend on Temple Shalom to hold many of our events, such as Kristallnacht which had over 700 attendees last season. I hope that Collier county will approve the rezoning which will be beneficial for the Temple and Federation. Thank you for your time in reading this email. Leslie Wasserman From: mart saperstein To: Wayne Arnold; Richard Yovanovich Subject: Fwd: Support for Jewish Federation"s request for a change to GG master plan Date., Tuesday, June 02, 2020 5:28:17 PM OK..both the Holocaust Museum and BBYO have sent in their letters within the 5 day limitation. Marc Begin forwarded message: From: Susan Suarez <susana_hmcec.org> Subject: Support for Jewish Federation's request for a change to GG master plan Date: June 2, 2020 at 5:26:21 PM EDT To: "sheapr19480)gmail.com" <sheapr1948 pmail.com>, "karlfry@comcast.net" <karlfry(d)comcast.net>, "edwinfryer(a1colliergov.ent" <edwinfryer(@colliergov.ent>, "edwinfryer1 e_gmail.com" <edwinfryer1 @gmail.com>, "ma rkstrainCabcolliergov.net" <markstrain(a)colliergov.net>, "4schmitt@comcast.net" <ischmitt(comcast.net>, "pdearborn(a-)iohnrwood.com" <pdearborn0)iohnrwood.com>, "karenhomiak�colliergove.net" <karenhomiak ano colliergove.net>, "ARWKJH(o)aol.com" <ARWKJH(a aol.com>, "eastmathAcollierschools.com" <eastmath a)collierschools.com> Cc: mart saperstein <mis821(@gmai1.com> Dear Planning Commission Members: The Holocaust Museum & Cohen Education Center strongly supports the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN) to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. • The JFGN is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County representing over 2500 members. • Its activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and its current approved usage, and enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of this community. • It is community asset that provides over $600,000 in grants annually to primarily local organizations, including some that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community, like the Holocaust Museum & Cohen Education Center. The Holocaust Museum uses these funds to educate thousands of Collier County school children and adults every year about the dangers of bigotry, hatred and violence. e It partners with other religious communities locally in programs like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue and runs the local "Shop with the Sheriff' program to provide Christmas gifts to lower income children. We hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Su4awSucwerk Susan L. Suarez, MBA, CFRE President and CEO Holocaust Museum & Cohen Education Center 975 Imperial Golf Course Blvd. Suite 108 Naples FL 34110 239-263-9200 x203 office 239-784-4521 cell susani@hmcec.ore www. H M CEC.org Thank you for including the Holocaust Museum in your will or estate plans �,. Holocaust Museum & Cohen Education Center ,t EXCELLENCE 'ovn r tripadvisor. a uu�uc r- From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Support for Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples request regarding Golden Gate Master Plan Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:26:57 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Jeffrey Feld <jfeldQ.9ewishna les.org> Subject: Support for Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples request regarding Golden Gate Master Plan Date: June 3, 2020 at 2:30:40 PM EDT To: "sheapr1948@gmail.com" <sheapr1948r7a gmr, ail.com>, "karlfry(@comcast.net" <karlfry(@comcast.net>, "edwinfryere-colliergov.net" <edwinfryer@colliergov.net>, "jschmitt@com cast, net" <jschmitt _ comcast.net>, "pdearbornla)johnrwood.com" <pdearbornng,johnrwood.com>, "karenhomiakt&colliergov.net" <karenhomiak@colliergov.net>, "eastmath@collierschools.com" <eastmath@collierschools.com> Collier County Planning Commission: My wife, Susan, and I strongly support and endorse the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's Campus. As you can see, I serve as the President/CEO of the Jewish Federation. Our Federation serves as the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and even Lower Lee County. Our activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom. In fact, we already collaborate on a multitude of programs to meet the needs of our community. Federation's primary mission is to enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian, and social service needs of our community. We do this, in some cases, through direct service and in other cases by providing allocations to organizations such as Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum so that they may be able to provide their services, as well. In addition, our Federation is involved with creating good and good will in the overall community. We do this through a variety of programs that include the Catholic -Jewish Dialogue, Shop with a Sheriff (working directly hand -in -hand with the Collier County Sheriff's Office), work with the Evangelical Pastors of Southwest Florida and more. All of our activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and its current approved usage. Again, my wife and I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval. By doing so, this will provide great benefits not only to the local Jewish community; however, but to the Greater Naples community as well! Thank you for your consideration. Jeffrey Jeffrey D. Feld President/CEO j(wish Federation OF GREATER NAGLES 2500 Vanderbilt Beach Road, #2201 Naples, FL 34109 (239) 263-4205 Cell: (901) 299-6438 JFeld _jewishnaples.ore www.jewi�hnaples.org From: marc saperstein To: Sharon Um en�hour_ Subject: Fwd: Temple Shalom Application Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:23:50 PM Begin forwarded message: From: HSFA <mel.hsfa@amail.com> Subject: Fwd: Temple Shalom Application Date: June 3, 2020 at 9.15.48 AM EDT To: marc saperstein <mjsUll na amp, ail.com> Here's a copy. Merlin Lickhalter Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Merlin Lickhalter <mel.hsfaamail.com> Date: June 2, 2020 at 6:00:00 PM EDT To: sheapr1948(a,ggmail.com, karlfry_(acomcast.net, edwinfryerlAgmail.com, markstrain�olliergov.net, ischmitt(a�comcast.net, pdearborn(c�iQhnrwood.com, karenhomiakncolliergove.net, eastmathAa collierschools.com Subject: Temple Shalom Application Dear Members of the Planning Commission, I am writing in support of Temple Shalom's application to change the Golden Gate Master Plan on its property to allow the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to build its new home on the western portion of Temple Shalom's campus. The JFGN is a non-profit umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County. representing over 2500 members. Our activities are complementary with Temple Shalom and Its current approved usage, and both enhance and enrich our community's quality of life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs. We provide more than $600,000 in grants annually to primarily local organizations, including some that serve the non-Jewish community like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. We regularly partner with other local religious communities in support of programs like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue, and we run the annual "Shop with the Sheriff" program to provide Christmas gifts to lower income children. I respectfully request that Collier County grant approval of this project that will benefit the entire Greater Naples Community. Thank you for your consideration. Merlin Lickhalter, FAIA, FACHA Board Member, Jewish Federation of Greater Naples and Member Temple Shalom From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Temple Shalom Support of the CC Planning Commission Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:21:14 PM Begin forwarded message: From: gbkatz5804(&ao1.com Subject: Temple Shalom Support of the CC Planning Commission Date: June 2, 2020 at 7.26:40 PM EDT To: shea rl9948@_gmail.com, karl.frya-colliercountylgov, edwinfryera colliergov.net, markstrain(@colliergov.net, jschmitt _ comcast.net, pdeaarborn ,at7o johnrwood.com, karenhomiak@colliergov.net, eastmathncollierschools.com Cc: mjs8�gmail.com To Whom It may Concern: I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build it's new home on Temple Shalom's campus. My reasons are as follows: Temple Shalom has been a positive asset to the Greater Naples community and a good neighbor for over 30 years During Hurricane Irma, Temple opened its doors to it neighbors for food, safety and shelter further demonstrating it community citizenship Temple Shalom has owned the vacant [parcel for 30 years with anticipation for future growth to provide for the growing number of Jewish families in our community I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration, Bobbie Katz 5804 Cinznano Court Naples, FI. 34119 From: mare saperstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Re -Zoning Request Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:22:55 PM Begin forwarded message: From: <izalasky(@gmail.com> Subject: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Re - Zoning Request Date: June 2, 2020 at 10.16.14 PM EDT To:<Karl.FryCcDcolliercountyfl.gov>, <sheapr1948l gmail.com>, <edwinfryera-colliergov.net>, <edwinfryer1(@gmail.com>, <markstraino)collieraov�net>, <ischmitt fcomcast.net>, <pdearbornlc�iohnrwood.com>, <karenhomiakacolliergov.net>, <ARWKJHaaol.com>, <eastmath(-a)collierschools.com> Cc: <mis821 (@gmail.com> Dear Collier County Planning Commission members The first public meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission to consider the joint request of Temple Shalom and The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN) to Re -Zone the Temple Shalom property is scheduled to take place on June 11, 2020. The purpose of the Re -Zoning request is to allow JFGN to build its new home on the Temple Shalom property. I am a full time resident of Naples, Florida. I am involved as a volunteer in the Jewish community in Southwest Florida as well as for SCORE as a volunteer mentor. Through my involvement in SCORE, I was recognized for my volunteer work with the Collier County Legal Aid Society. I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and JFGN to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan of Temple Shalom's property to allow JFGN to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. JFGN is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County. JFGN represents over 2500 members. The activities of JFGN are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and Its current approved usage. JFGN enhances and enriches the quality of life of both Jewish and non- Jewish citizens of Southwest Florida by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of this community. JFGN provides over $600,000 in grants annually; primarily to local Jewish and non-Jewish community organizations, like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. JFGN also partners with other religious communities locally in programs like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue and the local "Shop with the Sheriff" program to provide Christmas gifts to lower income children. JFGN has outgrown its current facilities and it needs a new home so it can continue to provide programs and services to citizens of Southwest Florida. I sincerely hope that Collier County will approve this project as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Jeff M. Zalasky 5851 Bromelia Court Naples, Florida 34119 From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples ---Golden Gate Master Plan Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:21:54 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Alvin Becker <alshbeck(@gmail.com> Subject: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples --- Golden Gate Master Plan Date: June 2, 2020 at 8.58.50 PM EDT To: sheapr19486EDgmail.com, Karlfry(a�colliercountyfl.g_ov, edwinf(yer6d)colliergov.net, markstrain(cDcolliergov.net, jschmitt( comcast.net, pdearborn ).iohnrwood.com, karenhomiak( colliergov.net, eastmath(@collierschools.com I am writing in support of the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan that will permit the Federation to build its new home on the Temple's campus . The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples' mission is to enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting the charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of the Jewish community. It also serves the non-Jewish community like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum and grants over $600,000 annually to primarily local organizations.Its activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and both organizations would benefit from the Federation's proximity to the Temple as would the Greater Naples community. For the benefit of the entire Collier County, we respectfully request the Planning Commission grant this project approval.. Thank you for your consideration. From: mart sanerstein To: Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Fwd: Thank you Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:22:46 PM Begin forwarded message: From: H Cohen <hwcohen<eDgmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Thank you Date: June 2, 2020 at 9:38:14 PM EDT To: marc saperstein <mjs821 Cc�amail.com> Begin forwarded message: From: H Cohen <hwcohen gmail.com> Date: June 2, 2020 at 8:54:17 PM EDT To: marc saperstein <mis821 _.gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Thank you Health and safety first! And know, this too will pass!! Begin forwarded message: From: H Cohen <hwcohen .gmail.com> Date: June 2, 2020 at 8:53:09 PM EDT To: shea r1948 _ ;gmail.com, edwinfryer collergov.net, markstrain(cor�.colliergov.net, ischmittcomcast.net, pdearborn�iolhnrwood.com, karenhomiakacolliergov.net, eastmathacollierschools.com, karl.frva,colIiercountvfI.LYOV Cc: i821sgmailxom Subject: Thank you I write to thank you for your service to our growing and dynamic community of Naples. As a Resident of Naples, and a Board member of the Jewish Federation of Collier County I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the JFGN to seek approved changes in the Golden Gate Master Plan on the Temple's property to allow for the building of a new home for the Jewish Federation on my Temple's campus. The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples, by various previous names, has, for decades, been the `central address' for the Jewish residents of Naples when seeking resources, services or ways of giving and volunteering. The JFGN, a charitable organization, provide over $600,000 in grants including those to local school programs, Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. The JFGN partners with other religious organizations and congregations throughout Collier County to stand shoulder to shoulder on our faith -based missions. Again, I thank you for your leadership and hope you will see the wisdom of granting approval to this project which, both near and long term, will benefit all of Greater Naples and Collier County. I wish you health and safety in these challenging times, Harvey Cohen From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Approval of Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation Request to Amend Golden Gate Master Plan Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:23:25 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Joel Pittelman <ipittelmana-icloud.com> Subject: Approval of Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation Request to Amend Golden Gate Master Plan Date: June 3, 2020 at 1.57:49 AM EDT To: shea r1p 948Qamail.com, Karl.Fry(2colliercountyfl.gov, edwinfryer6d)colliergov.net, markstrain(a1colliergov.net, ischmitto_comcast.net, pdearborn@iohnrwood.com, karenhomiakQcolliergov.net, eastmatha-collierschools.com Dear Mr. Chairman and Members: I'm certain you have, or will hear from many people about the numerous benefits and services the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples offers the Collier County community. Federation members are rightly proud of their contributions to the improvements they make. As a member of the Federation's Community Relations Council I can report that we work daily to promote relations with other community organizations, religious institutions and charitable groups to advance the lives and hopes of all people. While many people both enjoy and benefit from the Jewish Federation and Temple Shalom, that cannot be the sole determination for your approval of the master plan amendment. The Planning Commission's role, by State law, requires your attention to how the land is to be developed. You are charged with assuring that a master plan makes clear the community's preferences for the uses to which the land is to be put and provides a framework for consistency and predictability for your decisions. To quote State Statutes: The sections of the comprehensive plan containing the principles and strategies, generally provided as goals, objectives, and policies, shall describe how the local government's programs, activities, and land development regulations will be initiated, modified, or continued to implement the comprehensive plan in a consistent manner ... The plan shall establish meaningful and predictable standards for the use and development of land and provide meaningful guidelines for the content of more detailed land development and use regulations. (163.3177 FS, Emphasis add) The intent of this statute is that a master plan is to make consistent and predictable the future uses the community seeks to have the land developed. Years ago, Temple Shalom developed one of their 3 parcels and have used it in accordance with the community's preferences and its zoning laws ever since. The proposed change to the Master Plan requests an extension of essentially the same use of the two adjacent parcels as the Temple has always put to the first parcel. I can think of a no more consistent and predictable use than what is being proposed. The consistency and predictability of the plan could not be better served than with this request. I urge the Planning Commission to approve the change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and to permit the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Respectfully, Joel Pittelman 6001 Pelican Bay Blvd. #506 Naples, FL 34108 Bill and MaryZoe Bowden 4580 111h Ave. SW Naples, Fl 34116 To Whom it May Concern, 5/12/2020 My wife and I live on the street immediately south of Temple Shalom, a few houses east of the property and across the street. Having lived here for the past 5 years we can't think of anything negative or un-neighborly that has occurred with Temple Shalom. In fact, one of our friends who has abutting property with Temple told me he has no issue, that he is fine with the proposed land development. "They have been good neighbors". My father-in-law has been highly involved in the Catholic -Jewish dialogue for many years and we have attended many Kristallnacht services. As a Roman Catholic I support the development of the facility for the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples as brothers and sisters, together in faith with God. Sincerely, Bill Bowden FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 5:26 PM To: FinnTimothy; FaulknerSue Subject: FW: Collier County Planning Commission June 11 meeting, Letter in support of GoldenGate Master Plan for Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Collier country FYI Ra# Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Coi[Ter County Exceeding expectations, every day! TO us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https:/Iaoo.gl/eX.IvgT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:00 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@ coIIiercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Collier County Planning Commission June 11 meeting, Letter in support of GoldenGate Master Plan for Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Collier country I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Mark. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. if you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request. do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writfng_ From: Elaine Soffer <esoffer0921@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 10:30 PM To: sheapr1948@gmail.com; Karl.Fry@colliergov.net; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <jschmitt@comcast net>; pdearborn@iohnrwood.com; HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; eastmath@collierschools.com Cc: KarlFry <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Collier County Planning Commission June 11 meeting, Letter in support of GoldenGate Master Plan for Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Collier country EXTERNAL EMA: . This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Elaine Soffer 3899 Valentia Way Naples, FI 34119 June 3. 2020 Dear Collier County Planning Commission Members, I enthusiastically give my full support to the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater (JFGN) to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. The JFGN is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island, and Lower Lee County representing over 2500 members. Its activities are highly complementary with those of Temple Shalom and Its current approved usage and enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian, and social service needs of this community. As the President of the Women's Cultural Alliance (WCA), a JFGN affinity group, and it is entirely run by volunteers. WCA is both non -partisan and non-sectarian and welcomes women of all faiths. The approval of a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan to allow the JFGN build its new home on the Temple Shalom campus would mean a significant and positive change to the types and numbers of programs available on a regular basis to this group of women who share similar interests to participate in cultural. educational and social events. As a community asset, the JFGN provides over $600,000 in grants annually to primarily local organizations, including some that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community, like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. It partners with other religious communities locally in programs like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue and runs the local "Shop with the Sheriff' program to provide Christmas gifts to lower -income children. I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Elaine F. Soffer WCA President FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 5:28 PM To: FinnTmothy Cc: Faulkner5ue Subject: FW: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples ---Golden Gate Master Plan FYI ,Rag Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Co e,-r Cou.-nty Exceeding expectotions, every day! Tell us how we are doing by faking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.al/eXlvgT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 1:59 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples ---Golden Gate Master Plan I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Mili Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records_ If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity, Instead contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Alvin Becker <alshbeck@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 8:59 PM To: sheaprl948@gmail.com; Karlf colliercount fl. ov; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; Strain Mark <Mark.Strain@collie rcountyfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <'schmitt comcast.net>; gdearborn@lohnrwood.com, HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak colliercount fl, ov>; eastmath@collierschools.com Subject: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples ---Golden Gate Master Plan FXTERNAL EMAI'. This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I am writing in support of the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan that will permit the Federation to build its new home on the Temple's campus The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples' mission is to enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting the charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of the Jewish community. It also serves the non-Jewish community like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum and grants over $600,000 annually to primarily local organizations.lts activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and both organizations would benefit from the Federation's proximity to the Temple as would the Greater Naples community. For the benefit of the entire Collier County, we respectfully request the Planning Commission grant this project approval.. Thank you for your consideration. 2 FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 5:28 PM To: FinnTimothy Cc: Faulkner5ue Subject: FW: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples ---Golden Gate Master Plan FYI Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 c,-o e--r C'Omnty Exceeding expectations, everyday! Tel/ us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.ol/eXivgT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 1.59 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples ---Golden Gate Master Plan I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Mark, Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records_ If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request. do not send electronic mail to this entity, Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Alvin Becker <alshbeck@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 8:59 PM To: sheapr1948@gmail.com; Karlfry@colliercountvfl.gov; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fr er colliercount fl. ov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain colliercount fl. ov>; Joseph Schmitt <Oschmitt comcast.net>; dearborn iohnrwood.com; HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountvfl.gov>; eastmath@collierschools.com Subject: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples ---Golden Gate Master Plan EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I am writing in support of the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan that will permit the Federation to build its new home on the Temple's campus The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples' mission is to enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting the charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of the Jewish community. It also serves the non-Jewish community like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum and grants over $600,000 annually to primarily local organizations.Its activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and both organizations would benefit from the Federation's proximity to the Temple as would the Greater Naples community. For the benefit of the entire Collier County, we respectfully request the Planning Commission grant this project approval.. Thank you for your consideration. FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 5:28 PM To: FinnTimothy Cc: FaulknerSue Subject: FW: Thank you fyi Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239,252.6350 Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvgT. -----Original Message ----- From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 1:59 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Thank you I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Mark Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. -----Original Message ----- From: H Cohen <hwcohen@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 8:53 PM To: sheapr1948@gmail.com; edwinfryer@collergov.net; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <jschmitt@comcast.net>; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; eastmath@collierschools.com; KarlFry <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: js821@gmail.com Subject: Thank you EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I write to thank you for your service to our growing and dynamic community of Naples. As a Resident of Naples, and a Board member of the Jewish Federation of Collier County I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the JFGN to seek approved changes in the Golden Gate Master Plan on the Temple's property to allow for the building of a new home for the Jewish Federation on my Temple's campus. The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples, by various previous names, has, for decades, been the 'central address' for the Jewish residents of Naples when seeking resources, services or ways of giving and volunteering. The JFGN, a charitable organization, provide over $600,000 in grants including those to local school programs, Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. The JFGN partners with other religious organizations and congregations throughout Collier County to stand shoulder to shoulder on our faith -based missions. Again, I thank you for your leadership and hope you will see the wisdom of granting approval to this project which, both near and long term, will benefit all of Greater Naples and Collier County. I wish you health and safety in these challenging times, Harvey Cohen FinnTimoth From: Bel IowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 5:33 PM To: FinnTimothy Cc: FaulknerSue Subject: FW: Temple Shalom Support of the CC Planning Commission fyi Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 C ALTer C--� my Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey of htt s: oo. I eXiv T. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 1:59 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom Support of the CC Planning Commission I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. mGwkl Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity_ Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: gbkatz5804(@aol.com < bkatz5804 aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 7:27 PM To: Shea r1948 mail.com; KarlFry <Karl.Fr colliercount fl. ov>; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain colliercount fl. ov>; Joseph Schmitt <isch m ittCcDcomcast.net>; pdeaarborn@iohnrwood.com; HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak colliercount fl. ov>; eastmath@collierschools.com Cc: m's82lPgmail.com Subject: Temple Shalom Support of the CC Planning Commission EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. To Whom It may Concern: I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build it's new home on Temple Shalom's campus. My reasons are as follows: Temple Shalom has been a positive asset to the Greater Naples community and a good neighbor for over 30 years During Hurricane Irma, Temple opened its doors to it neighbors for food, safety and shelter further demonstrating it community citizenship Temple Shalom has owned the vacant [parcel for 30 years with anticipation for future growth to provide for the growing number of Jewish families in our community I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration, Bobbie Katz 5804 Cinznano Court Naples, FI. 34119 FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 5:34 PM To: FinnTimothy Cc: FaulknerSue Subject: FW: Re -Zoning of the Temple Shalom Property FYI Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvgT. -----Original Message ----- From. StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 1:58 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Re -Zoning of the Temple Shalom Property I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Mark Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. -----Original Message ----- From: Les Nizin <mcanaplespresident@gmaii.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 6:04 PM To: sheapr1948@gmail.com; edwinfryer@gmail.com; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@coiliercountyfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <jschmitt@comcast. net>; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; east math @coIIierschools.net; KarlFry <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re -Zoning of the Temple Shalom Property EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Members of the Collier County Planning Commission: I understand that the Planning Commission will be considering on June 11, 2020, an application to re -zone the Temple Shalom property, (This requires a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan) in order to allow, and permit the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to build a new home to accommodate the many activities of both the Federation, the Temple, as well as other community groups that may wish to use the facility. The JFGN, is an umbrella organization, for the Men's Cultural Alliance of Greater Naples, commonly referred to as the MCA. Under the leadership of the JFGN, the MCA, became a reality seven years ago, and now has over 750.members, from Naples, Marco Island, and the the lower Lee County. Many of our members, are members of Temple Shalom and the Mca, uses the facilities of the Temple, in order to accommodate some of our, events in which there are 300, or more in attendance. In addition the Federation is a wonderful, supportive partner to many local civic organizations. The community at large, as well as the members of the Mca, and the Federation, would greatly benefit if the Federation would be permitted to build its' new facility on the Temples campus. I thank you, for your kind consideration, personally, and on behalf of the Mca's 750 plus members, Les Nizin President of the Mca. z FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 S:35 PM To: FinnTimothy; FaulknerSue Subject: FW: Temple Shalom Application fyi R4# Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463, Fax: 239.252.6350 Co e,r Cou*lty Exceeding expectations, every day! TO us how we are doing by faking our Zoning Division Survey at his.://goo.cil/eXivvaT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 1:58 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows @colIiercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom Application I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Mark, Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Merlin Lickhalter <mel.hsfa@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 6:00 PM To: sheapr1948@gmail.com; KARLFRY@CDMCAST.NET; edwinfr eri mail.com; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountvfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <ischmitt@comcast.net>; pdearborn@iohnrwood.com; karenhomiak@colliergove.net; eastmath@coilierschools.com Subject: Temple Shalom Application EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Members of the Planning Commission, I am writing in support of Temple Shalom's application to change the Golden Gate Master Plan ❑n its property t❑ allow the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to build its new home on the western portion of Temple Shalom's campus. The JFGN is a non-profit umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County. representing over 2500 members. Our activities are complementary with Temple Shalom and Its current approved usage, and both enhance and enrich our Community's quality of life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs. We provide more than $600,000 in grants annually to primarily local organizations, including some that serve the non-Jewish community like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. We regularly partner with other local religious communities in support of programs like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue, and we run the annual "Shop with the Sheriff" program to provide Christmas gifts to lower income children. I respectfully request that Collier County grant approval of this project that will benefit the entire Greater Naples Community. Thank you for your consideration. Merlin Lickhalter, FAIA, FACHA Board Member, Jewish Federation of Greater Naples and Member Temple Shalom FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 5:35 PM To: FinnTimothy; FaulknerSue Subject: FW: Support for Jewish Federation's request for a change to GG master plan [Nil Rags Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Coer County Exceeding expectations, every day! Tel/ us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvgT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 1:57 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows @colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Support for Jewish Federation's request for a change to GG master plan I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Mark Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Susan Suarez <susan@hmcec.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 5:26 PM To: sheapr1948@gmail.com; KARLFRY@COMCAST.NET; edwinfryer@colhergov.ent; edwinfryerl@gmail.com; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <jschmitt@comcast.net>; pdearborn@Iohnrwood.COm; karenhomiak@colliergove.net; ARWKJH@aol.com; eastmath@collierschools.com Cc: mart saperstein <mhs821 mail.com> Subject: Support for Jewish Federation's request for a change to GG master plan EXTERNAL EMAIL This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Planning Commission Members: The Holocaust Museum & Cohen Education Center strongly supports the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN) to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. • The JFGN is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County representing over 2500 members. • Its activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and its current approved usage, and enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of this community. • It is community asset that provides over $600,000 in grants annually to primarily local organizations, including some that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community, like the Holocaust Museum & Cohen Education Center. The Holocaust Museum uses these funds to educate thousands of Collier County school children and adults every year about the dangers of bigotry, hatred and violence. • It partners with other religious communities locally in programs like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue and runs the local "Shop with the Sheriff' program to provide Christmas gifts to lower income children. We hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Su4cutiSVarelb, Susan L. Suarez, MBA, CFRE President and CEO Holocaust Museum & Cohen Education Center 975 Imperial Golf Course Blvd. Suite 108 Naples FL 34110 239-263-9200 x203 office 239-784-4521 cell susan@hmcec.org www.HMCEC.org Thank you for including the Holocaust Museum in your will or estate plans Nis �� �� Holocaust ® � � rt {M!t}VMNLi. 1 � Museum& Mipadvisor r - Cohen Education Center FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 5:25 PM To: FinnTimothy; Faulknel Subject: FW: Project approval for the Jewish Federation FYI Rary Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fox: 239.252.6350 Ca[L�ie-r Co�.nty Exceeding expectations, every day? TO us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://aoo.Qi/eX.ivgT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:01 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray. Bellows @colliercountyfl,gov> Subject: FW: Project approval for the Jewish Federation I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Mi Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request. do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing_ From: Stephen Satz <ssatz@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 9:34 AM To: mis0821@aol.com; sheaprl948@Bmail.com; KarlFry <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov>; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fr er colliercount fl. ov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; jschmitt@comast.net; dearborn johnrwood.com; HomiakKaren<Karen.Homiak@colIiercountyfLill eastmath@collierschools.com Subject: Project approval for the Jewish Federation EXTERNAL EMAIL This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I write to you in hopes that you will see the merits in granting approval to change the Golden Gate Master Plan to allow for the building of the Jewish Federation's new home on the Temple Shalom's campus. • This change would not only serve the Jewish community but the Greater Naples community as well. • It is an organization that provides over $600,000.00 in grants annually to local organizations - that include both Jewish and Non -Jewish causes. • It partners with other religious communities locally - like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue and runs the local "Shop with the Sheriff programs to provide gifts for lower income children. • The Jewish Federation oversees the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County which includes over 2500 members It's activities compliment Temple Shalom and it's current approved usage and it enhances the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of this community. 1 sincerely appreciate your time and effort in reviewing this matter and I hope that you will grant this project approval. It will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community but the Greater Naples Community as well. Thank you, Jamie Satz Jam13154(c�aol.corn 609.402.2201 FinnTimoth From: Be! IowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 5:26 PM To: FinnTimothy Cc: FaulknerSue Subject: FW: Approval of Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation Request to Amend Golden Gate Master Plan FYI ,za# Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Co [leer County Exceeding expectations, every day! TO us how we are doing by faking our Zoning Division Survey at https://cioo.gl/eXivgT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:01 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Approval of Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation Request to Amend Golden Gate Master Plan I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Marrc. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request. do not send electronic mail to this entity, Instead contact this office by telephone or in writing_ From: Joel Pittelman <ipittelman@icloud.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 1:58 AM To: rhea r1948 mail.com; KarlFry <Karl.Fry@col liercountyfl.gov>; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <jschmitt@comcast.net>; pdearborn@iohnrwood.com; HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfL_gov>; eastmath@collierschools.com Subject: Approval of Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation Request to Amend Golden Gate Master Plan EXTERNAL EMAIL This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Chairman and Members: I'm certain you have, or will hear from many people about the numerous benefits and services the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples offers the Collier County community. Federation members are rightly proud of their contributions to the improvements they make. As a member of the Federation's Community Relations Council I can report that we work daily to promote relations with other community organizations, religious institutions and charitable groups to advance the lives and hopes of all people. While many people both enjoy and benefit from the Jewish Federation and Temple Shalom, that cannot be the sole determination for your approval of the master plan amendment. The Planning Commission's role, by State law, requires your attention to how the land is to be developed. You are charged with assuring that a master plan makes clear the community's preferences for the uses to which the land is to be put and provides a framework for consistency and predictability for your decisions. To quote State Statutes: The sections of the comprehensive plan containing the principles and strategies, generally provided as goals, objectives, and policies, shall describe how the local government's programs, activities, and land development regulations will be initiated, modified, or continued to implement the comprehensive plan in a consistent manner ... The plan shall establish meaningful and predictable standards for the use and development of land and provide meaningful guidelines for the content of more detailed land development and use regulations. (163.3177 FS, Emphasis add) The intent of this statute is that a master plan is to make consistent and predictable the future uses the community seeks to have the land developed. Years ago, Temple Shalom developed one of their 3 parcels and have used it in accordance with the community's preferences and its zoning laws ever since. The proposed change to the Master Plan requests an extension of essentially the same use of the two adjacent parcels as the Temple has always put to the first parcel. I can think of a no more consistent and predictable use than what is being proposed. The consistency and predictability of the plan could not be better served than with this request. I urge the Planning Commission to approve the change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and to permit the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Respectfully, Joel Pittelman 6001 Pelican Bay Blvd. #506 Naples, FL 34108 Dear Mr. Chairman and Members: I'm certain you have, or will hear from many people about the numerous benefits and services the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples offers the Collier County community. Federation members are rightly proud of their contributions to the improvements they make. As a member of the Federation's Community Relations Council I can report that we work daily to promote relations with other community organizations, religious institutions and charitable groups to advance the lives and hopes of all people. While many people both enjoy and benefit from the Jewish Federation and Temple Shalom, that cannot be the sole determination for your approval of the master plan amendment. The Planning Commission's role, by State law, requires your attention to how the land is to be developed. You are charged with assuring that a master plan makes clear the community's preferences for the uses to which the land is to be put and provides a framework for consistency and predictability for your decisions. To quote State Statutes: The sections of the comprehensive plan containing the principles and strategies, generally provided as goals, objectives, and policies, shall describe how the local government's programs, activities, and land development regulations will be initiated, modified, or continued to implement the comprehensive plan in a consistent manner ... The plan shall establish meaningful and predictable standards for the use and development of land and provide meaningful guidelines for the content of more detailed land development and use regulations. (163.3177 FS, Emphasis add) The intent of this statute is that a master plan is to make consistent and predictable the future uses the community seeks to have the land developed. Years ago, Temple Shalom developed one of their 3 parcels and have used it in accordance with the community's preferences and its zoning laws ever since. The proposed change to the Master Plan requests an extension of essentially the same use of the two adjacent parcels as the Temple has always put to the first parcel. I can think of a no more consistent and predictable use than what is being proposed. The consistency and predictability of the plan could not be better served than with this request. I urge the Planning Commission to approve the change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and to permit the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Respectfully, Joel Pittelman 6001 Pelican Bay Blvd. 4506 Naples, FL 34108 FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 5:27 PM To: FinnTimothy Cc: FaulknerSue Subject: FW: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Re -Zoning Request FYI rR4 Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Co [der Cou"ty Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by faking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXivgT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:00 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Re -Zoning Request I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Ma *., Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity, Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Izalasky@gmail.com <Izalasky@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 10:16 PM To: KarlFry <Karl.Fry@col liercountyfl.gov>; sheapr1948@gmail.com; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer colliercountyfl.gov>; edwintr erl mail.com; StrainMark <Mark.Strain colliercount fl. ov>; Joseph Schmitt <Ischmitt@comcast.net>; dearborn johnrwood.com; HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; ARWKJH@aol.com; eastmath@col lierschools.com Cc: mjs821@gmaii.com Subject: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Re -Zoning Request EXTERNAL EMAP This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Planning Commission members The first public meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission to consider the joint request of Temple Shalom and The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN) to Re -Zone the Temple Shalom property is scheduled to take place on June 11, 2020. The purpose of the Re -Zoning request is to allow JFGN to build its new home on the Temple Shalom property. I am a full time resident of Naples, Florida. I am involved as a volunteer in the Jewish community in Southwest Florida as well as for SCORE as a volunteer mentor. Through my involvement in SCORE, I was recognized for my volunteer work with the Collier County Legal Aid Society. I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and JFGN to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan of Temple Shalom's property to allow JFGN to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. JFGN is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County. JFGN represents over 2500 members. The activities of JFGN are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and Its current approved usage. JFGN enhances and enriches the quality of life of both Jewish and non-Jewish citizens of Southwest Florida by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of this community. JFGN provides over $600,000 in grants annually; primarily to local Jewish and non- Jewish community organizations, like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. JFGN also partners with other religious communities locally in programs like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue and the local "Shop with the Sheriff" program to provide Christmas gifts to lower income children. JFGN has outgrown its current facilities and it needs a new home so it can continue to provide programs and services to citizens of Southwest Florida. I sincerely hope that Collier County will approve this project as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Jeff M. Zalasky 5851 Bromelia Court Naples, Florida 34119 2 From: Marc Saoerstein To: Sharon Um enhour Subject: Fwd: In favor of rezoning of Temple Shalom property Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 6:14:16 PM Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Nancy Kahn <deamancykahn@gmail.com> Date: June 3, 2020 at 6:04:26 PM EDT To: Kahn Nancy <dearnancykahn@gmail.com> Subject: In favor of rezoning of Temple Shalom property Dear Planning Commission members: This letter of support is in favor of the Re -Zoning of the Temple Shalom property in order that the Jewish Federation of Great Naples will be able to build their new home there. I belong to the Women's Cultural Alliance, an affinity group of the Federation. We run many cultural, educational, social, and philanthropic activities. Finding space to hold our group meetings is always a challenge. Having meeting space within the Federation Building would be a huge help for our over 1600 members The Federation provides programming and grants to many local organizations, including both Jewish and non-Jewish communities. I hope you will look favorably on this request. Thank you for your consideration. Nancy Kahn 1854 Winding Oaks Way Naples FL 34109 From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Jewish Federation new home needed Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 7:39:44 PM Another one Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: bsuden@aol.com Date: June 3, 2020 at 7:31:29 PM EDT To: "mjs821 @gmail.com" <mjs821 @gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Jewish Federation new home needed Reply -To: bsuden@aol.com Marc, This is what I sent to the planning commission. Barbara -----Original Message ----- To: sheapr1948@gmail.com <sheapr1948@gmail.com>; karlfry@colliercountyfl.gov <karlfry@colliercountyfl.gov>; edwinfryer@colIiergov.net <edwinfryer@colliergov.net>; markstrain@colliergov.net <markstrain@colliergov.net>; jschmitt@comcast.net <jschmitt@comcast.net> Sent: Wed, Jun 3, 2020 7:28 pm Subject: Jewish Federation new home needed My husband and I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. For the past 7 years, I have been treasurer of the Women's Cultural Alliance, which is an arm of the Jewish Federation. It is a wonderful organization that has helped with enriching the lives of women, both Jewish and non-Jewish, in this community through the many activities it offers. WCA also gives financially to charitable causes in Naples and is very well thought of. We definitely need space to run our programs as we have found rental spaces here are very difficult to find or extremely expensive. Being next to Temple Shalom, who has worked with us on many occasions would be such a benefit for us. By allowing this change, we would be able to continue our wonderful work and make this community an even better place to live. Sincerely. Barbara 5uden From: Marc sanerstein To: Sharon Umpgnhour Subject: Fwd: Proposed change to Golden Gate Master Plan Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 5:06:50 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Susan Hager <susan.k.hager a gmail.com> Subject: Proposed change to Golden Gate Master Plan Date: June 3, 2020 at 4.33:57 PM EDT To: sheapr19481@gmai1.com Cc: mjs0821 (&aol.com Dear Mr. Shea, We are writing to request that the Collier County Planning Commission approve a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan to permit the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to build its new facility on Temple Shalom's campus. This collaboration will strengthen the positive impact that both Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation already have on the Greater Naples Community. For example, during Hurricane Irma, Temple Shalom opened its doors to its neighbors for food, safety and shelter. It's preschool primarily serves the non-Jewish community. The Jewish Federation is home to a significant array of services that address community needs. This approval will also mean opportunities for sharing expanded parking and facilities for programs and events offered by both organizations. We urge your approval of this proposal. Sincerely, Susan and Thomas Hager From: mart saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: RE -ZONING OF TEMPLE SHALOM PROPERTY Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 5:18:02 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Toby Kosloff <tobykosloff016EDgmail.com> Subject: RE -ZONING OF TEMPLE SHALOM PROPERTY Date: June 3, 2020 at 4:42.17 PM EDT To: sheapr1948()amail.com, edwinfryer1 e_gmail.com, markstraine-col_ liergov.net, ischmitt@comcast.net, karenhomiak@colliergov.net, pdearborn cc johnrwood.com, eastmath@collierschools.com, Karl.Fry@colliercounty To The Collier County Planning Commission - I am writing in support of amending the Golden Gate Master Plan to allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's Campus. I am a full-time resident of Naples and have lived here for the past 13 years. Federation enriches Jewish life in Greater Naples and also provides monetary grants to primarily local organizations like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. Both of these valued organizations serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community. In addition Federation participates locally in programs like the Jewish -Catholic Dialogue and "Shop With a Sheriff' to help children in need at Christmas time. Many of the activities and services provided by Federation are aligned with those of Temple Shalom. The population of Naples keeps growing and a new home for Federation will benefit not only the local Jewish Community but also the Greater Naples community of all denominations. I hope that Collier County will grant approval for the project. Thank you for your consideration. Toby Kosloff 15290 Burnaby Drive Naples, FL 34110 From: marc saoerstein To: Wayne Arnold; Sharon Umoenhour; Richard Yovanovich Subject: Fwd: Support for Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation master plan variance Date: Thursday, June 04, 2020 8:50:21 AM Letter from neighbor Julie Schmelzle who I think Rich and Wayne both know. Marc Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Beth Wolf<winggy I @gmail.com> Date: June 4, 2020 at 7:30:59 AM EDT To: Saperstein Marc <mjs821@gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Support for Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation master plan variance Forwarding to you from Julie Schmelzle. Best regards, Beth Wolff 239-248-2925 winggyll agmai l.com bewolffl 0(a�gmai I.com o, ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Julie Schmelzle <jasch�.gmail.com> Date: Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 6:01 AM Subject: Fwd: Support for Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation master plan variance To: Wolff Brian and Beth <winggvl .gmail.com> I sent this to each of the commissioners on the planning commission. After the meeting I will send to each on the bcc. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Julie Schmelzle <iaschmelzle(a,.,gmail.com> o Date: Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:05 PM Subject: Support for Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation master plan variance To: <Karl,Frv, ncoIIiercountyfl.gov> Dear Mr. Fry, I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples as they seek approval for a change to the GG Master Plan. The plan to build a new home aligned with Temple Shalom makes for a powerful community asset. They will be able to expand and enhance their ability to support and engage in activities that enrich the quality of Jewish life. Their effectiveness in thoughtfully understanding the needs of our community in conjunction with their ability to extend various grants that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community is admirable and impactful. I am very familiar with their efforts as an organization. This combined with the fact that I am a neighbor falling within 1000 feet of the proposed change; I see this as an enhancement to the broader community of Collier County AND to our neighborhood. Please vote to approve this project. Sincerely, Julie A. Schmelzle Julie Schmelzle From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Support of the Jewish Federation of Great Naples building Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 5:03:32 PM Another one Begin forwarded message: From: Daryl Sissman <dsissmana_gmail.com> Subject: Support of the Jewish Federation of Great Naples building Date: June 3, 2020 at 4:02.46 PM EDT To: sheapr1948 @gm , ail.com, edwinfrvertacolliergov.net, ma rkstrain(a)colliergov.net, net, pdearborn a�johnrwood.com, karenhomiak(Wcolliergove.net, eastmathr'akollierschools.com, Karl. FryQcolliercountyfl.gov Cc: m.os0821 B_aol.com Good afternoon, My name is Daryl Sissman, I am the President of Temple Shalom. I am writing to you today to strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Temple Shalom has been in the current location for over 30 years and has enjoyed very good relationship in our community. Temple Shalom serves over 780 member families. We have offered the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples the opportunity to join us on our campus. The two organizations share members and has very complimentary activities. The expectation is the the two organizations will be able to share parking and facilities in the future. Temple Shalom on only serves the Jewish community but the non-Jewish Community as well. The building served as an emergency shelter during Hurricane Irma and opened the doors to the neighborhood for food, safety and shelter. Temple Shalom preschool is highly regarded and serves primarily a non-Jewish population. I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Daryl Sissman President of Temple Shalom From: marc saperstein To: Sharon Ump ne hour Subject: Fwd: Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation Date: Thursday, June 04, 2020 7:02:45 AM Begin forwarded message: From: Michael Feldman <michaelfnaples(a gmail.com> Subject: Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation Date: June 4, 2020 at 2.58.11 AM EDT To: "sheaprl948aa gmail. com" <sheapr1948na am� ail.com> Cc: Marc Saperstein <m.*s0821 cn_r aol.com> Dear Mr. Shea, I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom'sproperty and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. • Temple Shalom has been a positive asset to the Greater Naples community and a good neighbor for over 30 years. • It serves 780 member families and has a well -regarded and much needed community pre-school that primarily serves the non-Jewish community. • It has offered the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples, which has very complementary activities and membership, the opportunity to join them on its campus sharing expanded parking and facilities. • During Hurricane Irma, Temple opened its doors to its neighbors for food, safety and shelter further demonstrating its community citizenship. • Temple Shalom has owned the vacant parcel for 30 years with anticipation for future growth of services to provide for the growing number of Jewish families in our community. I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration, Michael A. Feldman, J.D., CFP® 239-238-8897 From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umoenhour Subject: Fwd: Temple Shalom/Federation building Land Use Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 5:21:19 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Beth Wolff <winggy1 na gm�, ail.com> Subject: Temple Shalom/Federation building Land Use Date: June 3, 2020 at 5:07:14 PM EDT To: shea r1� 948agmail.com, karl.fryaa colliercountyfl.gov, edwinfryere-collieraov.net, jschmitt a comcast.net, pdearborn ,cni�ohnrwood.com, O- karenhomiakcolliergov.net, eastmath0collierschools.com Cc: Marc Saperstein <mjs0821 Q_aol.com> Dear Collier County Planning Commissioners, 1 fully support the efforts of the Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on the property of Temple Shalom to be able to construct a building to house the future home of the Federation of Greater Naples. I have been a resident of Collier County for the past 24 years and a member of Temple Shalom equally as long. The Federation and Temple Shalom share a symbiotic relationship and both missions wish to create a campus and support a community that provides for the educational, spiritual, charitable and social service needs of the Jewish community here in Naples. I have watched the county and the Jewish community grow and cannot think of a better use for this land at this time. The Federation provides grants totaling over $600,000 a year to organizations in Naples and throughout the world. With that being stated, the Federation in its efforts to help repair the world, help our secular community with programs such as those that fight anti-Semitism through education. This is done by providing funding to the Holocaust Museum and Education Center which welcomes a variety of students each year. They also provide grants to the Naples Senior Center to help them provide food and social programs to participating seniors within our community. The Federation partners with other religious groups by supporting a Jewish Catholic dialog in Collier County as well as supporting a "Shop With A Sheriff" program that provides Christmas gifts for lower - income children, thereby fostering a positive image of law enforcement in our county. I wholeheartedly endorse this project and hope that you consider approving it as well Thank you in advance for your consideration. Best, Beth E. Wolff Resident of Collier County Leadership Collier Class of 2020 Beth Wolff 239-248-2925 wingg I(4,)gmaiI.com bewolffl 0(a�gmai Lcom FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 2:43 PM To: FaulknerSue; FinnTimothy Subject: FW: Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples More correspondence R" Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 co IL7+e-r Comvity Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://aoo.gl/eXivgT, From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 2:32 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity, Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing From: Steve Pino <stevepharm63@vahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:52 PM To: sheaprl948@gmaii.com; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.Bov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <jschmitt@comcast.net>; pdearborn@iohnrwood,com; HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak colliercount fl. ov>; eastmath collierschools.com; KarlFry <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples EXTERNAL EMAI` This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. We strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. • Temple Shalom has been a positive asset to the Greater Naples community and a good neighbor for over 30 years. • It serves 780 member families and has a well -regarded and much needed community pre-school that primarily serves the non-Jewish community. • It has offered the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples, which has very complementary activities and membership, the opportunity to join them on its campus sharing expanded parking and facilities. • During Hurricane Irma, Temple opened its doors to its neighbors for food, safety and shelter further demonstrating its community citizenship. • Temple Shalom has owned the vacant parcel for 30 years with anticipation for future growth of services to provide for the growing number of Jewish families in our community. We hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely Mr and Mrs Stephen Pino Members of Temple Shalom FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 2:43 PM To: FaulknerSue; FinnTimothy Subject: FW: Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples FYI R" Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Coei- Call Exceeding expectations, everyday! TO us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.ol/eX'vgT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 2:32 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@ col Iiercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Mark• Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity, Instead, contact this office by telephone or In writing. From: Steve Pino <stevepharm63@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:01 PM To: sheapr1948@gmail.com; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@col liercountvfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain colliercount fl. ov>; Joseph Schmitt <ischmitt@comcast.net>; dearborn iohnrwood.com; HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; eastmath@collierschools.com; KarlFry <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.t;ov> Subject: Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. We strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. • Temple Shalom has been a positive asset to the Greater Naples community and a good neighbor for over 30 years. • It serves 780 member families and has a well -regarded and much needed community pre-school that primarily serves the non-Jewish community. • It has offered the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples, which has very complementary activities and membership, the opportunity to join them on its campus sharing expanded parking and facilities, • During Hurricane Irma, Temple opened its doors to its neighbors for food, safety and shelter further demonstrating its community citizenship, • Temple Shalom has owned the vacant parcel for 30 years with anticipation for future growth of services to provide for the growing number of Jewish families in our community. We hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely Mr and Mrs Stephen Pino Members of Temple Shalom FinnTimoth From: 86lowsRay Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 2:44 PM To: FinnTimothy; FaulknerSue Subject: FW: Rezoning fyi Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvgT. -----Original Message ----- From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 2:32 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Rezoning Mark Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. -----Original Message ----- From: LESLIE WASSERMAN <leshbr@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:25 PM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Fwd: Rezoning EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. > Hello Gentlemen, i > I am writing you to support the rezoning of Temple Shalom's property to include Jewish Federation of Greater Naples on its campus. > I am an active member of both the Temple and JFGN.Many of our programs overlap.For example as the co-chair of Catholic-JewishDialogue we depend on Temple Shalom to hold many of our events, such as Kristallnacht which had over 700 attendees last season. > I hope that Collier county will approve the rezoning which will be beneficial for the Temple and Federation. Thank you for your time in reading this email. > Leslie Wasserman FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 2:44 PM To: Faulkner5ue; FinnTimothy Subject: FW: Support of the Jewish Federation of Great Naples building fyi M" Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Coi[ier Co�.r�ty Exceeding expectations, every day! TO us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.:gl/eXevgT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 2.32 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Support of the Jewish Federation of Great Naples building Ma k, Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records- If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing From: Daryl Sissman <dsissman@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 4:03 PM To: sheaprl948C@gmail.com; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; Strain Mark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <ischmitt@comcast.net>; dearborn Oohnrwood.com; karenhomiak@colliergove.net; eastmath@coilie_ rschools.com; Kai <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.p'ov> Cc: mws0821 aol.com ' Subject: Support of the Jewish Federation of Great Naples building EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good afternoon, My name is Daryl Sissman, I am the President of Temple Shalom. I am writing to you today to strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Temple Shalom has been in the current location for over 30 years and has enjoyed very good relationship in our community. Temple Shalom serves over 780 member families. We have offered the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples the opportunity to join us on our campus. The two organizations share members and has very complimentary activities. The expectation is the the two organizations will be able to share parking and facilities in the future. Temple Shalom on only serves the Jewish community but the non-Jewish Community as well. The building served as an emergency shelter during Hurricane Irma and opened the doors to the neighborhood for food, safety and shelter. Temple Shalom preschool is highly regarded and serves primarily a non-Jewish population. hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Daryl Sissman President of Temple Shalom FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 117 PM To: FaulknerSue; FinnTimothy Subject: FW: Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Building rezoning request FYI ,Raq Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463, Fax: 239,252.6350 Exceeding expectations, every day? Tel/ us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvq . From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 2:34 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bel lows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Building rezoning request Mcwk, Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records, If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: sedneb@aol.com <sedneb@aol.com> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 11:42 AM To: she a rl948 maii.com; KarlFry <Karl.Fry@colliercountvfl.gov>; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <ischmitt@comcast. net>; pdearborn@iohnrwood.com; Karenhomiak@collier.gov.net; eastmath@collierschools.com Subject: Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Building rezoning request EXTERNAL EMAIL This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners and Representatives, I am asking you to approve rezoning the land next to Temple Shalom on Pine Ridge for a new Jewish Federation building. Our community of over 2500 members will use the land and the building in cooperation with Temple Shalom and will be able to continue our social service activities, our charitable work with grants to community organizations and and our partnering with other religious organizations in the region. At this time in history it is vitally important to support activities that promote peaceful coexistence. We will be fine stewards of the land. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration. Sincerely, Lea Bendes FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 3:33 PM To: FaulknerSue; FinnTimothy Subject: FW: Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation FYI R" Raymond v. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463: Fax: 239.252.6350 Co liar County Exceeding expectations, every day? Te// us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://cioo.gl/eXmvgT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 2:33 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation MaAl Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records, If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing_ From: Michael Feldman <michaelfnaples@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 3:07 AM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfi.gov> Cc: Marc Saperstein <m1s821Pgmail.com> Subject: Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation EXTERNAL EMAIL This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Strain, strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change t❑ the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom'sproperty and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Temple Shalom has been a positive asset to the Greater Naples community and a good neighbor for over 30 years. It serves 780 member families and has a well -regarded and much needed community pre- school that primarily serves the non-Jewish community. It has offered the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples, which has very complementary activities and membership, the opportunity to join them ❑n its campus sharing expanded parking and facilities. ❑ During Hurricane Irma, Temple opened its doors to its neighbor's for food, safety and shelter further demonstrating its community citizenship. Temple Shalom has owned the vacant parcel for 30 years with anticipation for future growth of services to provide for the growing number of Jewish families in our community. I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration, Michael A. Feldman, J.D., CFP® 239-238-8897 FinnTimoth From: BellowsRay Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 3:34 PM To: FaulknerSue; FinnTimothy Subject: FW: In favor of rezoning of Temple Shalom property FYI Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvgT. -----Original Message ----- From: Strain Mark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 2:33 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bel lows@colIiercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: In favor of rezoning of Temple Shalom property Mark Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. -----Original Message ----- From: Nancy Kahn <dearnancykahn@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 6.04 PM To: Kahn Nancy <dearnancykahn@gmail.com> Subject: In favor of rezoning of Temple Shalom property EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Planning Commission members: This letter of support is in favor of the Re -Zoning of the Temple Shalom property in order that the Jewish Federation of Great Naples will be able to build their new home there. I belong to the Women's Cultural Alliance, an affinity group of the Federation. We run many cultural, educational, social, and philanthropic activities. Finding space to hold our group meetings is always a challenge. Having meeting space within the Federation Building would be a huge help for our over 1600 members. The Federation provides programming and grants to many local organizations, including both Jewish and non-Jewish communities. I hope you will look favorably on this request. Thank you for your consideration. Nancy Kahn 1854 Winding Oaks Way Naples FL 34109 Douglas Loewer 4780 Fine Ridge Road Naples, Florida 34119 Douglasloewer2011 @comcast.net 443 880 4581 August 10, 2019 Gil Martinez Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Temple Shalom Submission Mr. Martinez : I appreciate your time, squeezing me into your busy schedule on Thursday, August 9, 2019 As per your request, I am writing this letter to formally present my concerns for the project. I am not opposed to the development. I am a professional engineer registered in Florida for 35 years, but most of my professional work was performed in Maryland. I have also held licenses in Maryland as a professional surveyor and both superintendent and operator of both waterworks and wastewater works. I own the house directly to the west of the Temple Shalom development. Any project has to be analyzed for future uses. Much of the design to date has been based upon a use specific project, i.e., the Federation will be the only user of this property forever. When a rezoning is approved, it should be palatable for all uses in that zoning. My major concerns fall into two categories: sewage and drainage. SEWAGE 1. The flow for this project is the equivalent of 33 single family homes. The three lots would normally have no more than 3 homes. The flow would be about 10,000 gallons per day versus 900 gpd. 2. There are no plans for any sewage treatment other than the septic tank. There are no plans for any grey water recirculating. There are no plans for sprinkler reclamation. There is no plan for a package plant, or secondary or tertiary treatment at all. All 10,000 gallons will flow into a septic field daily. 3. 10,000 gpd of untreated sewage at a point discharge into the groundwater will change the quality of the groundwater. Contamination is tied to governmental standards. I believe these flows will cause contamination of the groundwater, but the groundwater will have major changes if 10,000 gpd of raw sewage is dumped into the groundwater daily. 4. I am unsure as to how the septic field is designed. Most of the sewage increase is from the 22,000 square foot proposed Federation building but part of the sewage increase is for the school expanding from 70 to 200 students. There is an existing septic system for the synagogue and school. The initial septic field was installed in 1991 and should be replaced when the expansion is approved. A new system will have to be installed for the 22,000 sf Federation building. The new Federation system could be designed large enough to include the school expansion or the new school system but a lift station would be required. I would recommend 2 new systems, so, if the Federation structure is sold off, the septic fields are separate. $. In the documents, the computations for the amount of sewage flow is prorated. The average daily flow for the school is computed, multiplied by 300 ( the number of school days) and then divided by 365 days. This artificially reduces the flow. For a septic system, the regular daily flow cannot be prorated. The septic field will be overloaded and the septic tank will be undersized when the school is in session. DRAINAGE l . The existing synagogue and school has stormwater management that was designed in 1991. The stormwater requirements are much more stringent now than in 1991. The stormwater system installed along Pine Ridge Road has not been maintained and is not functioning now. The drainage from the existing structures currently flows and dissipates into the vacant lot that is going to be developed into the Federation project. The existing stormwater should be upgraded to current standards since the school is expanding and the stormwater can no longer flow into the vacant lot. 2. The new building has a small detention pond. The pond is between the new building and my property. The top of the pond is at elevation 12' and the bottom at 11'. My property has an elevation of 11'. There is a drainage ditch running north -south on the west side of my neighbors's lot. My neighbor to the west has filled his lot to elevation 13'. So water permeating onto my lot from the new pond and becoming surface water cannot run to the ditch because of the elevation difference. 3. There is a long ditch leading from the pond ..around the parking lot to the existing outfall at elevation 10' at Pine Ridge Road. They are apparently using the ditch as additional storage. The friction from the flow distance and the 90 degree bends will cause the pond to overflow before it drains to the road. The overflow will run through the habitat area and onto my property; bad for the habitat and bad for me. Placing the pond so far from the outfall permits the drainage design to artificially increase the time of concentration in the developed condition which means the designed pond is much too small. 4. The soils on the properties are a loose sand. The geohydrology of the soils will cause my property to fill up with the Federation stormwater running underground from the pond and filling up my yard. 5. In the documentation presented, the allowable uses for the preserve area includes water management and water management structures. If a proper pond is designed, there will be no preserve area that is not part of the pond. The preserve area cannot be used for water management. 6. The documents also include a deviation for a 70% for grassed parking. 15% is the maximum grassed parking usually accepted. As an aside, grassed parking would only be acceptable for the Federation- Temple Shalom use. Other future uses would cause major renovations to the parking and stormwater. Apparently, the stormwater design is based upon the parking area being grass and not asphalt. The runoff from asphalt is 98 %. The runoff for grass is 2011/o to 40%. However, the grassed parking cannot be considered to be as permeable as uncompacted grass, probably 70% to 80 % runoff. The pond is much too small and will not meet stormwater requirements. The neighbors will be impacted with this poor design. The 15% County doctrine for grassed parking should be upheld on this project. 7. The outfalI for the Temple Shalom Stormwater management will be used for the Federation outfall also. The stormwater will run easterly along Pine Ridge Road and cross Pine Ridge Road in a northerly direction at the southern boundary of the Federation property. The current pipe will cause a restriction in the flow and water will pond in the right of way. The road ditch will have so much flow that the neighbors yards to the north will be flooded as the stormwater runs to the ditch. g. In accordance with the Code, stormwater flow to a certain level must be maintained on the property. If that is accomplished, my neighbors and I will have minor impact; however, the current design can be manipulated on paper to have no impact, but, in actuality, this project can flood many properties. I have a lot more to say, but I promised to keep this letter short. So I will pause here. Sincerely, Douglas Loewer, PE Cc: Debra Antzis, Temple President Marc Saperstein Douglas Loewer 4780 Pine Ridge Road Naples, Florida 34119 Douglasloewer2011 @comcast.net 443 880 4581 November 25, 2019 Tim Finn Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Temple Shalom Submission IIVJM TIE Please include this letter in both Temple Shalom submissions on the County Portal. My wife and I are opposed to the Temple Shalom Project. We believe that it is premature. I am a professional engineer licensed in Maryland since 1980 and Florida since 1983. 1 am registered in 5 other states but spent most of my professional career on the eastern shore of Maryland, Delaware and Virginia. My specialty is sewage flow, septic fields, drainage and stormwater management. Ocean City, Maryland has many of the same design challenges as Collier County, except the mean elevation is 6. Since public sewer is not available, the project will use two septic systems. The volume of sewage will be equivalent to at least 44 houses whereas the current zoning would permit 2 houses. The quantity and quality of the sewage proposed will ultimately contaminate the groundwater. The adjoining property owners will get sick, develop cancer and die, much like what happened in the Dunbar community in Fort Myers. The traffic engineer at the Neighborhood Information Meeting proposed a traffic pattern that will greatly increase the number, severity and rate of accidents. The parking has been miscalculated. The stormwater management is under designed, and, because ❑f this, the drainage will be overloaded and the adjoining properties will be flooded, including the north side of Pine Ridge Road. There are many commercial buildings in the area with large vacancies. These spaces are already hooked up t❑ public sewer and water, are pre engineered for stormwater and drainage, have parking established and the traffic patterns are established, These commercial areas are far more suited for the Federation project. This project would be better suited for this site after public sewer becomes available and Pine Ridge Road is widened to three lanes. Sincerely, Douglas Loewer, PE Beverly Loewer Douglas Loewer 4780 Pine Ridge Road Naples, Florida 34119 Douglasloewer2011 @comcast.net 443 880 4581 December 6, 2019 Tim Finn Collier County Growth Management ❑epartment Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Temple Shalom Submission Mr. Finn : Please include this letter in both Temple Shalom submissions ❑n the County Portal. Please also provide this letter t❑ any reviewer and other agency that would normally provide expertise t❑ the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners. I would appreciate the reviewers' input so that I can become familiar with local design criteria. This letter concerns septic computations and design. The Collier County Health Department my also have interest in my comments. My wife and I are opposed to the Temple Shalom Project. We believe that it is premature. I am a professional engineer licensed in Florida since 1983. 1 am registered in 5 other states but spent most of my professional career on the eastern shore of Maryland, Delaware and Virginia. My specialty is sewage flow, septic fields, drainage and stormwater management. ❑cean City, Maryland has many of the same design challenges as Collier County, except the mean elevation is 6. The Temple Shalom Project is on public water but plans to dispose of the sewage into septic fields. Most of the neighbors have wells for their domestic water and sprinkler systems. Temple Shalom has computed their sewage production at 8,884 gpd. I compute their sewage at 15,458 gpd. The difference is mostly associated with food preparation spaces at both venues; however the flow from the school should not be adjusted to 300 days and the assembly area in the new building has not been divided from the office building space. The one tract scheduled for the office building is zoned estate and could only have 2 residences on it. At 300 to 400 gpd by County regulations, that would average to 700 gpd ❑f sewage daily at maximum design. The entire 3 lot site would total a maximum of 6 residences, totaling 2100 gpd. At 8,884 gpd, the office building will be the equivalent of 25+ houses; at 15,458 gpd, 44 houses. And commercial sewage is very different from residential sewage. Remember, that most of the residences near the project are on domestic well systems and most of them have sprinkler systems that operate off the same well. Each station of a sprinkler system can draw 2,000 gallons per hour, overnight 20,000 gallons. As the sprinkler system draws the groundwater out, the water from a septic tank disposal field (along with other groundwater in a concentric pattern) is drawn closer to the well. Then, the well refills the domestic storage tank usually in the morning right after the sprinkler system has drawn the groundwater toward the well. 5o, does that groundwater have sewage components in it or does the soil strata clean up the sewage before it gets to the well head? It depends on the geohydrology and will require extensive study to determine. The minimum standards for the distance between a domestic well and a septic field and system is 75 feet. However, this minimum distance is for a domestic residential well and a residential septic system. Section 64E-6.005 of the Florida Health Code states: Location and Installation. All systems shell be located and installed so that with proper maintenance the systems fun ctio n in ❑ son itary manner, do not create sanit❑ry nuisances or health hazards and do not endanger the safety of any domestic water supply, groundwater or surface water. Sewage waste an effluent from onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems shall not be discharged onto the ground surface or directly or indirectly discharged into ditches, drainage structures, ground waters, surface waters, or aquifers. To prevent such discharge or health hazards: (1) Systems and septage stabilization facilities established after the effective date of the rule shall be placed no closer than the MINIMUM distances indicated for the following: (a) Seventy five feet from a private potable well as defined in paragraph 64E- 6.002(44)(a), F.A.C., or a multi family water well as defined in paragraph 64E- 6.002(44)(c), F.R. C. (b) One -hundred feet from a public drinking water well as defined in paragraph 64E-6.002(44)(b), F.A.C., if such a well serves a facility with an estimated sewage flow of 2000 gallons or less per day. (c) Two -hundred feet from a public drinking water well as defined in paragraph 64E-6.002(44)(b), F.R. C., if such a well serves o facility with an estimated sewage flow of more than 2000 gallons per day... Distances between a domestic well and a large volume commercial project must be much greater. The theory is that a residential septic flow will be cleaned up by its low flowrate through sand to the groundwater and then be disbursed as the geohydraulics of the groundwater flows through the subsurface materials. In fact, for this quantity of septic flow, I do not believe that the setback distance can be accommodated anywhere on the subject lot. In my opinion, even if the septic field were placed in the middle of the lot, it would still be too close to existing wells to prevent contamination. The soil is a coarse sand with stone at 2 - 3 feet down and groundwater is at 3 —4 feet down. A canal exists at 250 feet from the proposed site, which governs the geohyrology. The course sand in the septic fields will have to be excavated and replaced with finer sand. Course sand permits the water flow to be so quick that the sewage cleaning done by the sand is much less than a finer sand. Both my neighbor's and my septic system are elevated, so the two Temple Shalom systems will most likely have to be elevated also. The existing septic system on the synagogue and school is too small. The septic tank is only 1500 gallons and the grease trap is only 300 gallons. The existing septic field dates back to 1991 and must be replaced. The fines from the sewage have settled in the sand at the stone -sand boundary at the bottom of the disposal trench. Because of the size of the system, two systems for the school and synagogue and another two systems will be required for the office building. The former will require 2- 5300 gallon tanks and the later will require 2-4300 gallon tanks. With the on -site rock being 2 — 3 feet down the installation of the tanks will be challenging. For trenches, the total field size will be 18488 SF for the Office Building and 13717 SF for the synagogue and school, for seepage beds, 14790 SF and 10974 SF. These areas do not include side slopes around the perimeter. The areas shown on the site plan are much too small. The septic fields on the site plan are very close the southerly property lines. If the fields fail or the sewage is more than the design, the overflow will run onto the southerly neighbors property from the proposed elevated system. A blowout could occur in an elevated system, bringing raw sewage to the surface which would flow offsite ont❑ the neighbor's property. This amount of sewage will contaminate the groundwater. Even if all the neighbors change to public water, the sprinkler systems would still bring the contaminated water to the surface and the sewage component will remain ❑n the grass. If it is determined that construction could proceed, I would recommend that the proposed food service area in the office building be deleted and the existing food service area at the school be removed. The food service areas could be added back when public sewer becomes available, so the kitchen areas could be roughed in now. This change would reduce the sewage flow from 15458 gpd by 1/3. Remember that the 5 gallons per capital per day for food preparation is not all just in the preparation. People eating lunch are likely to wash their hands before and after eating and some will use the facilities an extra time daily. Temple Shalom currently brings in food to be served to the children, so there is still a component that increases the sewage flow even though the food is not prepared onsite. Lunch cleanup requires water usage. The proposed building could be designed with gray water systems and reclamation of water for the landscaping sprinkler system. Retrofitting the school and synagogue would be difficult. Instead ❑f septic tanks, a small package plant could be installed to improve the quality of the sewage before it is dumped into the groundwater. At the very least, a system to add oxygen to the system would be productive. Since a septic system is sealed from the surface, little ❑xygen reaches the sewage in the tanks. Sewage comes complete with bacteria, both aerobic and anaerobic. In the septic system, anaerobic bacteria are dominant because of the low oxygen. Anaerobic bacteria act very slowly on sewage cleanup. Aerobic bacteria act much quicker. The amount of sewage cleanup performed by anaerobic bacteria in 30 days could be performed by aerobic bacteria in ❑ne day. Simply taking a large paddle and stirring the sewage and permitting surface air to be mixed in would greatly improve the quality of the sewage before subsurface disposal. Furthermore, the septic fields will last much, much longer when they receive a better quality sewage. It would appear that, if the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners approve the submission, the amount of sewage will be fixed at the 8884 gpd computed by the ❑wner's professionals. Furthermore, there is no proposal for sewage disposal other than the standard septic field with no treatment. I can guarantee that this amount ❑f untreated sewage will change the groundwater for the worse, contaminating the water for domestic use. We have a long history of good intentions that became catastrophes. Love canal cost $400 million and took 21 years to cleanup. Fukushima nuclear plant was built in an earthquake zone and on the coast in a tsunami zone. After 8 years, they have still not even developed a robot to locate the missing rods. ❑econtamination will cost $200 billion and take over 30 years to complete. Locally, the Dunbar community in Fort Myers has cost $4,000,000 to cleanup and took several years. The sludge was placed there 50 years ago. And now there are numerous health associated lawsuits. If the Temple Shalom project continues as is, who will pay for the contamination cleanup. Temple Shalom is incorporated. The County will not cleanup the groundwater on a private project. Professional errors and omissions insurance will object to paying for cleanup ❑n a project approved by government agencies and the limits would not be nearly enough to clean up the contamination. Then, there are the lawsuits for people getting sick from the contamination. As an engineering professional with 39 years of experience in this field, there is no question that the project as proposed will contaminate the groundwater. Who will be responsible and pay for the cleanup? Sincerely, Douglas Loewer, PE ❑ouglas Loewer 4780 Pine Ridge Road Naples, Florida 34119 Douglasloewer2011 @comcast.net 443 88❑ 4581 December 15, 2019 Tim Finn Collier County Growth Management ❑epartment Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Temple Shalom Submission Mr. Finn : Please include this letter in both Temple Shalom submissions on the County Portal. Please also provide this letter t❑ any reviewer and other agency that would normally provide expertise t❑ the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners. I would appreciate their input so that I can become familiar with local design criteria. These comments and suggestions concern the proposed traffic design. I am a professional engineer licensed in Florida since 1983. I will address the traffic situation at Temple Shalom Project. The County reviewers have rejected the second entrance for the office building. I believe that a second entrance is necessary. if the lot with the proposed office building would be sold off, there would be no access except through the existing Temple Shalom entrance which would require easements and right ❑f ways. During the Neighborhood Information Meeting, the traffic engineer said that the second entrance was still in play. He said that there would be a right turn in and right turn out. Since there would be no new cross -over, there would be no left turns out of the second entrance and no westbound left turns into the entrance. He stated that there would be a left turn lane added for eastbound traffic exiting the proposed entrance at the existing entrance. This alignment would be a disaster. Currently, cars exiting Temple Shalom stack in the crossover median between the eastbound and westbound lanes, sometimes three wide. There are also westbound vehicles trying to make a left turn into Temple Shalom. The cars in the median crossover cannot see past the left turning vehicles for them to pull into the westbound lane. Adding an eastbound left turn lane will mean that the cars coming from three directions will not be able to view oncoming traffic. The new entrance should be moved to the existing crossover to the west. A deceleration lane should be placed from the end of the guard rail to the new entrance across my lot and my neighbor's lot. An acceleration lane should be installed from the new entrance all the way to the easterly property line for Temple Shalom. A new eastbound deceleration lane should be installed at the existing entrance next to the new acceleration lane. The next crossover to the east from the existing entrance should have a left turn lane, (including concrete curbing for limited access), installed, like the one recently added to Pine Ridge Road when Collier Boulevard was widened.An apron on the westbound shoulder will have to be added to accommodate the u turns. Left turns out of the new entrance across the existing crossover should be prevented. A left turn lane on westbound Pine Ridge Road at the new entrance at the existing crossover could be helpful in reducing the left turns at the existing entrance, but an analysis will have to be performed to check it's safety feasibility. It would be required if the office building were split off. The recommended left turn lane eastbound at the existing entrance should be prevented. In fact , no u turn and no left turn signs should be installed on the eastbound shoulders. There simply is not enough space between the two entrances to enter traffic doing 50 mph, change two lanes and decelerate into the proposed left turn lane. ❑f course, the best situation would be the installation of a traffic light at the existing entrance. Even a limited use flashing yellow light like are installed at fire houses would be great. But for obvious reasons, traffic lights are normally not permitted at religious facilities. Would it make a difference if Temple Shalom paid for the traffic light and its maintenance? The new entrance will be used by Members of the Jewish Federation. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting, the Federation said that they had 2,000 clients annually and 100 clients per day. of the 2,000 clients, 83% are older than 70 years old. I believe that the analysis of the traffic pattern should accommodate a more elderly driver with a longer reaction time and poorer eyesight. Under the single entrance design, I also do not believe that elderly drivers should be mixed in with preschool children. The single entrance is at such a distance from the new building that it will cause the elderly drivers to get lost on the school campus trying to find their way out onto Pine Ridge Road. They would encounter children at certain times ❑f the day if they used the wrong lane to exit the Temple Shalom property. Currently, there is n❑ proposal for reworking the existing travel ways and parking areas ❑n the existing synagogue and school portion. The traffic pattern on Pine Ridge Road must be designed with the utmost safety concerns both on Pine Ridge Road and internally throughout the existing campus. Ultimately, a mistake here will cause a tremendous increase in accidents and vehicular deaths, raise everyone's auto insurance in the area and put young children at risk. Sincerely, Douglas Loewer, PE FinnTimothy From: FinnTimothy Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 9:06 AM To: 'douglasloewer2011 @comcast.net' Cc: WeeksDavid Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Attachments: Pineda Fine Sand.PNG See below response From: Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahon@flhealth.gov> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 2:17 PM To: OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov>; WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov>; VanBlaricom, Rachel M <Rachel.VanBlaricom@flhealth.gov> Subject: RE: Temple Shalom submissions EXTERNAL EMAIL This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good afternoon all, I apologize for the delay in my response as I wanted to take some time to provide you the most thorough response as I possibly can to address the inquiry from Mr. Loewer. First and foremost, I wanted to clarify that I have not seen any proposed floor plans or septic site plans, so there are aspects of my response which will be dependent on the submission of plans. There is quite a bit to unpack here, but I'm going to try to address any of Mr. Lower's questions directly pertaining to my jurisdiction over the OSTDS permitting. "Temple Shalom has computed their sewage production at 8,884 gpd. I compute their sewage at 15,458 gpd. The difference is mostly associated with food preparation spaces at both venues; however the flow from the school should not be adjusted to 300 days and the assembly area in the new building has not been divided from the office building space." I cannot respond to the estimated flow of the facility without floor plans and proposed use. The simple calc. sheet Mr. Herrera provided would not be sufficient for official sizing. However, provided the floor plans do match the use proposed in the calc sheet, then I agree that the sizing parameters appear to be consistent with the sizing provided in Table I of 64E-6, F.A.C. In regards to the partial use of the school, I have already addressed this in my response with the engineer (Mr. Herrera) on 8/21/19. "Under the Pre- school sizing: the code does not provide guidance on deduction for inactive school days. So estimated flow would be 2375gpd for 200 students and 25 staff members provided there is no cafeteria or showers associated with the school." Additionally, the calc. sheet submitted by Mr. Herrera seems to include a peak flow loading factor. See comment from my original response in August: "I'm assuming "1.5 max. month" is referring to a loading factor for freeways? If so there is no loading factor required in septic system sizing. Loading factors are only considered with Grease trap sizing per 64E-6.013(7)(d)l, F.A.C. You of course may oversize a system to meet what you believe peak flow to be, but there is no guidance that minimum specifications will be determined by estimated flow multiplied by a loading rate for anything other than establishments next to an interstate highway." 2. "So, does that groundwater have sewage components in it or does the soil strata clean up the sewage before it gets to the well head? It depends on the geohydrology and will require extensive study to determine." Septic systems have proven to be an effective method of removing pathogens from wastewater for a very long time. There have been extensive studies to show that the soil beneath the drainfield, should it meet the effective soil requirements detailed in 64E-6, F.A.C., is effective in this process. A component of OSTDS permitting is a site evaluation completed by a licensed engineer with soils training (P.E.) or Certified Environmental Health Professional (CEHP). The site evaluation submitted will detail the soils beneath the proposed drainfield area and whether soil excavation and replacement will be necessary to meet drainfield installation standards. 3. "The minimum standards for the distance between a domestic well and a septic field and system is 75 feet. However, this minimum distance is for a domestic residential well and a residential septic system."..." (1) Systems and septage stabilization facilities established after the effective date of the rule shall be placed no closer than the MINIMUM distances indicated for the following: (a) Seventy-five feet from a private potable well as defined in paragraph 64E-6.002(44)(a), F.A.C., or a multi- family water well as defined in paragraph 64E-6.002(44)(c), F.A.C. (b) One -hundred feet from a public drinking water well as defined in paragraph 64E-6.002(44)(b), F.A.C., if such a well serves a facility with an estimated sewage flow of 2000 gallons or less per day. (c) Two -hundred feet from a public drinking water well as defined in paragraph 64E-6.002(44)(b), F.A.C., if such a well serves a facility with an estimated sewage flow of more than 2000 gallons per day... Distances between a domestic well and a large volume commercial project must be much greater. The theory is that a residential septic flow will be cleaned up by its low flowrate through sand to the groundwater and then be disbursed as the geohydraulics of the groundwater flows through the subsurface materials. In fact, for this quantity of septic flow, I do not believe that the setback distance can be accommodated anywhere on the subject lot. In my opinion, even if the septic field were placed in the middle of the lot, it would still be too close to existing wells to prevent contamination. These setbacks are the required minimum distances from proposed systems to wells. While the system will undoubtedly have an estimated sewage flow of more than 2000gpd, the facility is not serviced by well. To the best of my knowledge, the existing and proposed structures will be serviced by public utility water service. Therefore, the only wells requiring the minimum horizontal setback will be to the neighboring, private potable wells. The system will need to maintain a 75ft. setback to those wells. Looking at the aerial I don't see there being an issue achieving this setback. 4. "The soil is a coarse sand with stone at 2 - 3 feet down and groundwater is at 3 — 4 feet down. A canal exists at 250 feet from the proposed site, which governs the geohyrology. The course sand in the septic fields will have to be excavated and replaced with finer sand. Course sand permits the water flow to be so quick that the sewage cleaning done by the sand is much less than a finer sand. Both my neighbor's and my septic system are elevated, so the two Temple Shalom systems will most likely have to be elevated also." As stated in response #2 above, the site evaluation submitted will detail the soils beneath the proposed drainfield area and whether soil excavation and replacement will be necessary to meet drainfield installation standards. However, our office often uses the USGS Web Soil Survey for baseline indicators before evaluating a particular site. According to the USGS Soil Survey, the entirety of the property is mapped as #128 — Pineda Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum. The typical soil profile is provided in the description for the soil complex. In this case a typical soil profile should show fine sand, not course sand, down to approximately 30" before hitting a moderately limited layer of loam, before the eventual bedrock at approximately 55 to 65 inches below grade. Should the site evaluation reflect this typical profile, soil replacement would not be necessary given the natural fine sand beneath grade. However, this area is often limited in septic elevation by the estimated wet season water table. 64E-6, F.A.C. provides that new systems must achieve a minimum of 24" of vertical separation between the estimated wet season water table and the bottom of drainfield elevation. As Pineda Fine Sand is often associated with high water table elevations (3-18 inches below grade), this separation will undoubtedly 2 result in a mounded septic system as is typical in that area (as well as most of Collier County). I have attached a graphic detailing the general characteristics of Pineda Fine Sand to this email. 5. "Because of the size of the system, two systems for the school and synagogue and another two systems will be required for the office building. The former will require 2- 5300 gallon tanks and the later will require 2-4300 gallon tanks. With the on -site rock being 2 — 3 feet down the installation of the tanks will be challenging"... "For trenches, the total field size will be 18488 SF for the Office Building and 13717 SF for the synagogue and school, for seepage beds, 14790 SF and 10974 SF. These areas do not include side slopes around the perimeter. The areas shown on the site plan are much too small." There is no way to calculate min. ium tank capacity or drainfield size without knowing the exact estimated sewage flow. And I cannot determine the exact estimated sewage flow without reviewing the proposed floor plans. Minimum tank capacities and drainfield sizing will be provided by me or a representative of this department with the issuance of the septic permit. 6. "Instead of septic tanks, a small package plant could be installed to improve the quality of the sewage before it is dumped into the groundwater. At the very least, a system to add oxygen to the system would be productive. Since a septic system is sealed from the surface, little oxygen reaches the sewage in the tanks. Sewage comes complete with bacteria, both aerobic and anaerobic. In the septic system, anaerobic bacteria are dominant because of the low oxygen. Anaerobic bacteria act very slowly on sewage cleanup. Aerobic bacteria act much quicker. The amount of sewage cleanup performed by anaerobic bacteria in 30 days could be performed by aerobic bacteria in one day. Simply taking a large paddle and stirring the sewage and permitting surface air to be mixed in would greatly improve the quality of the sewage before subsurface disposal. Furthermore, the septic fields will last much, much longer when they receive a better quality sewage." Package plants are under the jurisdiction of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 381.0065(3)(a) provides that it is the responsibility of the Department of Health to permit systems with domestic flow up to 10000 gallons per day. At this juncture, provided the design calculations are correct, I do not see the estimated flow exceeding 10000 gallons per day. While I am not sure because I have never seen it happen before, I find it unlikely that DEP would permit a package plant for any system under the jurisdiction of the DOH. All things considered, given the proposed design calculations provided by Mr. Herrera and my knowledge of soils in the area, i believe that a septic sstem to service the new construction is fegsible. While Mr. Loewer's letter is quite thorough, without any plans to suggest use other than what Mr. Herrera proposed, I do not see validity in his claims to ascertain that a septic system could not be installed on the lot. As you know, I am limited in my approval of permits by 381.0065, F.S. and 64E-6, F.A.C. As long as the design fits within the parameters established in those codes, the OSTDS permit shall be issued by this office. Please feel free to forward my response to Mr. Loewer with your response to his particular zoning questions. Sincerely, Justin Mahon Environmental Supervisor II Florida Department of Health in Collier County 239-252-5524 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY ENCUESTA DE SATISFACCION DEL CLIENTE KLIYAN SATISFAKSYON SON DAJ Mission: To protect, promote & improve the health of all people in Florida through integrated state, county & community efforts. Vision: To be the Healthiest State in the Nation Values: (ICARE) 3 nnovation: We search for creative solutions and manage resources wisely. C olloboration: We use teamwork to achieve common goals & solve problems. Accountability: We perform with integrity & respect. From: OrthRichard R esponsiveness: We achieve our mission by serving our customers & engaging our partners. Excellence: We promote quality outcomes through learning & continuous performance improvement. Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state officials regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e-mail communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure. <Richa rd.Orth @colliercou ntyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 1:56 PM To: FeyEric <Lric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov>; Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahon flhealth. ov> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov>; losephitisErin <Erin.Jose hitis colliercount fl. ov>; WeeksDavid <David.Weeks colliercount fl. ov> Subject: RE: Temple Shalom submissions Tim and Eric, I recommend waiting to hear from DOH. Rick Orth Richard Orth, P.G., Sr. Environmental Specialist Collier County Growth Management Department Capital Project and Impact Fees Program Management Stormwater Management Section 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Ste 103, Naples, FL 34104 Office 239-252-5092, Cellular 239-634-9024 RichardOrth CollierGov.Net From: FeyEric <Eric.Fey@coil iercountvfi.gov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 4:16 PM To: Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahon@flhealth.gov> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Jose hitis colliercount fl. ov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Justin, Please read the attached letter from Douglas Loewer, P.E. outlining future septic system concerns regarding the proposed Temple Shalom expansion (PUDZ-PL20180003710). I am also attaching prior email correspondence to refresh your memory. Respectfully, Eric Fey, P.E. Principal Project Manager C o ier Com"ty Public utilities Engineering a Project Management Division Continuous Improvement 3339 Tarniami Trail East, Suite 303, Naples, Florida 34112-5361 Phone: 239.252.1037 Cell: 239,572.0043 "HOW ARE WE DOING?" Please click here for our Customer Service Survey From: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 2:20 PM To: FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks coiliercount fl. ov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Hi all, Please review the attached letter from Douglas Loewer and provide any input you may have to him regarding his concerns. Thank you From: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 11:31 AM To. FinnTimothy <Timoth . Finn@ coiliercount f1. ov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Mr. Loewer's latest letter. From: Douglas Loewer <dou Iasloewer2011 comcast.net> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 5:57 AM To: WeeksDavid <David -weeks@ colliercount fl. ov> Subject: Fwd: Temple Shalom submissions EXTERNAL EMAIL This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Did you receive this earlier in the week? Douglas Loewer, PE Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: DGL <dou lasloewer2011 comcast.net> Date: December 10, 2019 at 10:20:56 AM EST To: davidweeks@colliergov.net Subject: Temple Shalom submissions Attached are my comments and suggestions in the sewage area on the above referenced project Please include the letter on the portal for both applications. Douglas Loewer, PE Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Report , Map Unit Description Collier County Area, Florida 128—Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land complex, O to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2x9fz Elevation: 0 to 150 feet Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 68 inches Mean annual air temperature: 68 to 77 degrees F Frost -free period: 350 to 365 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Pineda, limestone substratum, and similar soils: 43 percent Urban land: 38 percent Minor components: 19 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Pineda, Limestone Substratum Setting Landform: Flats on marine terraces, drainageways on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, Calf, dip Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear, concave Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits over limestone Typical profile A - 0 to 4 inches: fine sand E - 4 to 12 inches: fine sand Bw - 12 to 18 inches: fine sand E' - 18 to 30 inches: fine sand Btg/E - 30 to 38 inches: sandy clay loam Btg - 38 to 55 inches: fine sandy loam 2R - 55 to 65 inches: bedrock Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 80 inches to lithic bedrock Natural drainage class: Poorly drained Runoff class: Very high Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 3 to 18 inches FinnTimothy From: Douglas Loewer <douglasloewer2011 @comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 3:00 PM To: FinnTimothy Subject: Re: Temple Shalom submissions EXTERNAL EMAIL This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I have perused your answer. Naturally, my concern is mainly contamination of the drinking water. The volume and quality of the sewage is the integral issue. I am disappointed that you would accept Mr Herrera's computation of sewage flow without seeing the construction drawings and dismiss mine for the same reason. I will cut through the red tape and ask the only important question: When the groundwater is contaminated, who is responsible? You seem to think that no problem exists. My 39 years of experience would disagree. I would like to avert the problem before construction, before contamination of the groundwater and before my neighbors get cancer like in Dundalk. Douglas Loewer, PE Sent from my iPhone On Dec 19, 2019, at 9:06 AM, FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn @col liercountyfl.gov> wrote: See below response From: Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahon@flhealth.gov> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 2:17 PM To: OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@coiliercountyfl.gov>; FeyEric <Eric.Fey@coIIiercountyfl.gov> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov>; Weeks David <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov>; VanBlaricom, Rachel M <Rachel.VanBlaricom@flhealth.gov> Subject: RE: Temple Shalom submissions EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good afternoon all, I apologize for the delay in my response as I wanted to take some time to provide you the most thorough response as I possibly can to address the inquiry from Mr. Loewer. First and foremost, I wanted to clarify that I have not seen any proposed floor plans or septic site plans, so there are aspects of my response which will be dependent on the submission of plans. There is quite a bit to unpack here, but I'm going to try to address any of Mr. Lower's questions directly pertaining to my jurisdiction over the OSTDS permitting. 1. "Temple Shalom has computed their sewage production at 8,884 gpd. I compute their sewage at 15,458 gpd. The difference is mostly associated with food preparation spaces at both venues; however the flow from the school should not be adjusted to 300 days and the assembly area in the new building has not been divided from the office building space." ! cannot respond to the estimated flow of the facility without floor plans and proposed use. The simple calc. sheet Mr. Herrera provided would not be sufficient for official sizing. However, provided the floor plans do match the use proposed in the calc sheet, then I agree that the sizing parameters appear to be consistent with the sizing provided in Table I of 64E-6, F.A.C. In regards to the partial use of the school, I have already addressed this in my response with the engineer (Mr. Herrera) on 8/21/19. "Under the Pre-school sizing: the code does not provide guidance on deduction for inactive school days. So estimated flow would be 2375gpd for 200 students and 25 staff members provided there is no cafeteria or showers associated with the school." Additionally, the calc. sheet submitted by Mr. Herrera seems to include a peak flow loading factor. See comment from my original response in August: "I'm assuming "1.5 max. month" is referring to a loading factor for freeways? If so there is no loading factor required in septic system sizing. Loading factors are only considered with Grease trap sizing per 64E- 6.013(7)(d)1, F.A.C. You of course may oversize a system to meet what you believe peak flow to be, but there is no guidance that minimum specifications will be determined by estimated flow multiplied by a loading rate for anything other than establishments next to an interstate highway." 2. "So, does that groundwater have sewage components in it or does the soil strata clean up the sewage before it gets to the well head? It depends on the geohydrology and will require extensive study to determine." Septic systems have proven to be an effective method of removing pathogens from wastewater for a very long time. There have been extensive studies to show that the soil beneath the drainfield, should it meet the effective soil requirements detailed in 64E-6, F.A.C., is effective in this process. A component of OSTDS permitting is a site evaluation completed by a licensed engineer with soils training (P.E.) or Certified Environmental Health Professional (CEHP). The site evaluation submitted will detail the soils beneath the proposed drainfield area and whether soil excavation and replacement will be necessary to meet drainfield installation standards. 3. "The minimum standards for the distance between a domestic well and a septic field and system is 75 feet. However, this minimum distance is for a domestic residential well and a residential septic system."..." (1) Systems and septage stabilization facilities established after the effective date of the rule shall be placed no closer than the MINIMUM distances indicated for the following: (a) Seventy-five feet from a private potable well as defined in paragraph 64E-6.002(44)(a), F.A.C., or a multi -family water well as defined in paragraph 64E-6.002(44)(c), F.A.C. 2 (b) One -hundred feet from a public drinking water well as defined in paragraph 64E- 6.002(44)(b), F.A.C., if such a well serves a facility with an estimated sewage flow of 2000 gallons or less per day. (c) Two -hundred feet from a public drinking water well as defined in paragraph 64E- 6.002(44)(b), F.A.C., if such a well serves a facility with an estimated sewage flow of more than 2000 gallons per day... Distances between a domestic well and a large volume commercial project must be much greater. The theory is that a residential septic flow will be cleaned up by its low flowrate through sand to the groundwater and then be disbursed as the geohydraulics of the groundwater flows through the subsurface materials. In fact, for this quantity of septic flow, I do not believe that the setback distance can be accommodated anywhere on the subject lot. In my opinion, even if the septic field were placed in the middle of the lot, it would still be too close to existing wells to prevent contamination. nese setbacks are the required minimum distances from proposed systems to wells. While the system will undoubtedly have an estimated sewage flow of more than 2000gpd, the facility is not serviced by well. To the best of my knowledge, the existing and proposed structures will be serviced by public utility water service. Therefore, the only wells requiring the minimum horizontal setback will be to the neighboring, private potable wells. The system will need to maintain a 75ft. setback to those wells. Looking at the aerial I don't see there being an issue achieving this setback. 4. "The soil is a coarse sand with stone at 2 - 3 feet down and groundwater is at 3 — 4 feet down. A canal exists at 250 feet from the proposed site, which governs the geohyrology. The course sand in the septic fields will have to be excavated and replaced with finer sand. Course sand permits the water flow to be so quick that the sewage cleaning done by the sand is much less than a finer sand. Both my neighbor's and my septic system are elevated, so the two Temple Shalom systems will most likely have to be elevated also." As stated in response #2 above, the site evaluation submitted will detail the soils beneath the proposed drainfield area and whether soil excavation and replacement will be necessary to meet drainfield installation standards. However, our office often uses the USGS Web Soil Survey for baseline indicators before evaluating a particular site. According to the USGS Soil Survey, the entirety of the property is mapped as #128 — Pineda Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum. The typical soil profile is provided in the description for the soil complex. In this case a typical soil profile should show fine sand, not course sand, down to approximately 30" before hitting a moderately limited layer of loam, before the eventual bedrock at approximately 55 to 6S inches below grade. Should the site evaluation reflect this typical profile, soil replacement would not be necessary given the natural fine sand beneath grade. However, this area is often limited in septic elevation by the estimated wet season water table. 64E-6, F.A.C. provides that new systems must achieve a minimum of 24" of vertical separation between the estimated wet season water table and the bottom of drainfield elevation, As Pineda Fine Sand is often associated with high water table elevations (3-18 inches below grade), this separation will undoubtedly result in a mounded septic system as is typical in that area (as well as most of Collier County). I have attached a graphic detailing the general 7haracteristics of Pineda Fine Sand to this email. 5. 'Because of the size of the system, two systems for the school and synagogue and another two systems will be required for the office building. The former will require 2- 5300 gallon tanks and the later will require 2-4300 gallon tanks. With the on -site rock being 2 — 3 feet down the installation of the tanks will be challenging"... "For trenches, the total field size will be 18488 SF for the Office Building and 13717 SF for the synagogue and school, for seepage beds, 14790 SF and 10974 SF. These areas do not include side slopes around the perimeter, The areas shown on the site plan are much too small," 3 There is no way to calculate minimum tank capacity or drainfield size without knowing the exact estimated sewage flow. And I cannot determine the exact estimated sewage flow without reviewing the proposed floor plans. Minimum tank capacities and drainfield sizing will be provided by me or a representative of this department with the issuance of the septic permit. 6. "Instead of septic tanks, a small package plant could be installed to improve the quality of the sewage before it is dumped into the groundwater. At the very least, a system to add oxygen to the system would be productive. Since a septic system is sealed from the surface, little oxygen reaches the sewage in the tanks. Sewage comes complete with bacteria, both aerobic and anaerobic. In the septic system, anaerobic bacteria are dominant because of the low oxygen. Anaerobic bacteria act very slowly on sewage cleanup. Aerobic bacteria act much quicker. The amount of sewage cleanup performed by anaerobic bacteria in 30 days could be performed by aerobic bacteria in one day. Simply taking a large paddle and stirring the sewage and permitting surface air to be mixed in would greatly improve the quality of the sewage before subsurface disposal. Furthermore, the septic fields will last much, much longer when they receive a better quality sewage." Package plants are under the jurisdiction of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 381.006S(3)(a) provides that it is the responsibility of the Department of Health to permit systems with domestic flow up to 10000 gallons per day. At this juncture, provided the design calculations are correct, I do not see the estimated flow exceeding 10000 gallons per day. While I am not sure because I have never seen it happen before, I find it unlikely that DEP would permit a package plant for any system under the jurisdiction of the DOH, All things considered, given the proposed design calculations provided by Mr. Herrera and my knowledge of soils in the area, I believe that a septic sstem to service the new construction is feasible. While Mr. Loewer's letter is quite thorough, without any plans to suggest use other than what Mr. Herrera proposed, I do not see validity in his claims to ascertain that a septic system could not be installed on the lot. As you know, I am limited in my approval of permits by 381.0065, F.S. and 64E-6, F.A.C. As long as the design fits within the parameters established in those codes, the OSTDS permit shall be issued by this office. Please feel free to forward my response to Mr. Loewer with your response to his particular zoning questions. Sincerely, Justin Mahon Environmental Supervisor II Florida Department of Health in Collier County 239-252-5524 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY ENCUESTA DE SATISFACCION DEL CLIENTE KLIYAN SATISFAKSYON SONDAJ Mission: To protect, promote & improve the health of all people in Florida through integrated state, county & community efforts. Vision: To be the Healthiest State in the Nation Values: (ICARE) nnovation: We search for creative solutions and manage resources wisely. C oNaborotion: We use teamwork to achieve common goals & solve problems. 4 Accountability: We perform with integrity & respect. R esponsiveness: We achieve our mission by serving our customers & engaging our partners. Excellence: We promote quality outcomes through learning & continuous performance From: improvement. OrthRichard Please note: Florida has a very broad public records low. Most written communications to or from state officials regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e-mail communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure. <Richard.Orth@colliercountvfl.gov> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 1:56 PM To: FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfi.gov>; Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahoneflhealth.Roy> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.go >; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov>; WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@ colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Temple Shalom submissions Tim and Eric, I recommend waiting to hear from DOH. Rick Orth Richard Orth, P.G., Sr. Environmental Specialist Collier County Growth Management Department Capital Project and Impact Fees Program Management Stormwater Management Section 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Ste 103, Naples, FL 34104 Office 239-252-5092, Cellular 239-634-9024 RichardOrth@CollierGov.Net From: FeyEric <Eric.Fe colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 4:16 PM To: Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahon@flhealth.gov> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfi.gov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountvfl.gov>; WeeksDavid <David.Weeks colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Justin, Please read the attached letter from Douglas Loewer, P.E. outlining future septic system concerns regarding the proposed Temple Shalom expansion (PUDZ-PL20180003710). I am also attaching prior email correspondence to refresh your memory. Respectfully, Eric Fey, P.E. Principal Project Manager <i mage001. j pg> Public Utilities Engineering & Project Management Division Continuous improvement 3339 Tomiami Trail East, Suite 303, Naples, Florida 34112-5361 Phone: 239.252.1037 Cell: 239.572,0043 "HOW ARE WE DOING?" Please click here for our Customer Service Survey From: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 2:20 PM To: FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Jose hitis colliercount fl. ov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks colliercount fl. ov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Hi all, Please review the attached letter from Douglas Loewer and provide any input you may have to him regarding his concerns. Thank you From: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl,gov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 11131 AM To: FinnTimothy <Timoth .Finn colliercount fl. ov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Mr. Loewer's latest letter. From: Douglas Loewer <douglasloewer2011@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 5:57 AM To: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyf .gov> Subject: Fwd: Temple Shalom submissions EXTERNAL EMA, This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Did you receive this earlier in the week? Douglas Loewer, PE Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: DGL <dou Iasioewer2011 comcast.net> Date: December 10, 2019 at 10:20:56 AM EST To: davidweeks collier ov.net Subject: Temple Shalom submissions Attached are my comments and suggestions in the sewage area on the above referenced project. Please include the letter on the portal for both applications. Douglas Loewer, PE Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. <Pineda Fine Sand.PNG> FinnTimoth From: Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahon@flhealth.gov> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 5:11 PM To: douglasloewer2011@comcast.net Cc: FinnTimothy; FeyEric; VanBlaricom, Rachel M; OrthRichard; JosephitisErin; WeeksDavid Subject: Temple Shalom EXTERNAL EMAIL This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. Loewer, First and foremost I would like to clarify that I did not "accept" any of the design calculations submitted to me by Mr. Herrera. I simply stated that the design calcs submitted seem consistent with the sizing criteria established in Table I, 64E-6, F.A.C. You did not provide any of your calculations, but rather simply stated that you computed their sewage production differently. I am limited in my reviewing authority by 381,0065. Specifically 381.0065(4)(p) provides that no system will be reviewed without an application accompanied by all fees. Therefore, I am by no means reviewing any submission for a septic permit until all applicable plans and fees have been provided to this office. The engineering folks at Collier County simply asked me to provide if a septic system was feasible on the property. And at this juncture I believe that an OSTDS is feasible on the property in question. Should the actual design submitted prove to be inconsistent with 381.0065, F.S., or 64E-6, F.A.C., then the permit will be rejected and the design will need to be modified to fit the parameters established in the law and code. Mr. Loewer, septic systems have been in use in this county for a very long time. There are other, larger systems in use in the county which have not created the contamination you speak of. Once again I am limited in my permitting authority by the provisions of 381.0065, F.S., and 64E-6, F.A.C. Should the submission meet the design criteria, then the permit shall be issued by this office. I have included your most recent correspondence with Mr. Finn below for your reference. "I have perused your answer. Naturally, my concern is mainly contamination of the drinking water. The volume and quality of the sewage is the integral issue. am disappointed that you would accept Mr Herrera's computation of sewage flow without seeing the construction drawings and dismiss mine for the same reason. I will cut through the red tape and ask the only important question: When the groundwater is contaminated, who is responsible? You seem to think that no problem exists. My 39 years of experience would disagree. I would like to avert the problem before construction, before contamination of the groundwater and before my neighbors get cancer like in Dundalk. Douglas Loewer, PE" Sincerely, Justin Mahon Environmental Supervisor II Florida Department of Health in Collier County 239-252-5524 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY / ENCUESTA DE SATISFACCION DEL CLIENTE / KLIYAN SATISFAKSYON SONDAJ Mission: To protect, promote & improve the health of all people in Florida through integrated state, county & community efforts. Vision: To be the Healthiest State in the Nation Values: (ICARE) nnovation: We search for creative solutions and manage resources wisely. C ollaboration: We use teamwork to achieve common goals & solve problems. A ccountability: We perform with integrity & respect. Responsiveness: We achieve our mission by serving our customers & engaging our partners. Excellence: We promote quality outcomes through learning & continuous performance improvement. Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state officials regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e-mail communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure. t FinnTimoth From: Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahon@flhealth.gov> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 10:41 AM To: Douglas Loewer Cc: FinnTimothy; VanBlaricom, Rachel M; FeyEric; OrthRichard; JosephitisErin; WeeksDavid Subject: RE: Temple Shalom EXTERNAL EMAH. This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good morning Mr. Loewer, Once again I want to reiterate that I am limited in my permitting authority by the provisions of 381.0065, F.S., and 64E-6, F.A.C. Should the submission meet the established criteria, then the permit shall be issued by this office. The minimum setback to a neighboring, private potable well is 75 feet. I am obligated to issue permits should they meet the minimum standards provided in the code and law. There has been no submission of septic plans, no application for a septic permit, and no fees paid for the review of any septic designs at this juncture. I have neither approved, nor denied any permit for the installation of a proposed OSTDS on the property. I was simply asked if an OSTDS would be feasible on the lot. Given the lot size, characteristics, location of obstructed areas, and the connection to municipal water service, I am confident the authorized sewage flow on the lot will be greater than the estimated sewage flow. Therefore, an OSTDS to service the lot is feasible, but no system is approved for installation by this office at this time. Thank you, Justin Mahon Environmental Supervisor 11 Florida Department of Health in Collier County 239-252-5524 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY / ENCU'ESTA DE SATISFACCION DEL CLIENTE / KLIYAN SATISFAKSYON SONDAJ Mission: To protect, promote & improve the health of all people in Florida through integrated state, county & community efforts. Vision: To be the Healthiest State in the Nation Values: (ICARE) nnovation. We search for creative solutions and manage resources wisely. C olloboration: We use teamwork to achieve common goals & solve problems. Accountability: We perform with integrity & respect. R esponsiveness: We achieve our mission by serving our customers & engaging our partners. E xcellence: We promote quality outcomes through learning & continuous performance improvement. Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state officials regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e-mail communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure. From: Douglas Loewer <dougIasloewer2011 @comcast. net> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 5:40 PM To: Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahon@flhealth.gov> Subject: Re: Temple Shalom I will drop off my computations. I have been a registered professional engineer since 1980. 1 received registration in Florida in 1983. I also hold registrations as a wastewater and waterworks superintendent and operator. All four licenses in Maryland. I designed, built and operated the largest septic field ever built in Maryland. It processed 14,000 thousand gallons per day and 29 100' lines with a three foot trench were constructed and 2 replacement fields were required. The groundwater was over 17' from the surface. The closest well to the fields was 2000'. It was attached to a 100,000 extended aeration sewage plant which received awards for its processing. Yes, septic fields are a great way to dispose of sewage. However, sometimes the project has to be scaled down to reduce the flow. The new building has kitchen facilities for an assembly hall. The old synagogue and daycare has kitchen facilities (according to the president) that are not in use. My recommendation is to curtail both of the kitchens until the site is served by public sewer. I do not believe that 75' is enough distance between a domestic well and even the 9000 gpd septic system proposed by Mr. Herrera. Particularly, when you include sprinkler system drawdown at the domestic well, The project will contaminate the groundwater as it currently stands. Who is responsible if I am right? Douglas Loewer, PE Sent from my iPhone On Dec 19, 2019, at 5:10 PM, Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahon@flhealth.gov> wrote: Mr. Loewer, First and foremost I would like to clarify that I did not "accept" any of the design calculations submitted to me by Mr. Herrera. I simply stated that the design calcs submitted seem consistent with the sizing criteria established in Table I, 64E-6, F.A.C. You did not provide any of your calculations, but rather simply stated that you computed their sewage production differently. I am limited in my reviewing authority by 381.0065. Specifically 381.0065(4)(p) provides that no system will be reviewed without an application accompanied by all fees. Therefore, I am by no means reviewing any submission for a septic permit until all applicable plans and fees have been provided to this office. The engineering folks at Collier County simply asked me to provide if a septic system was feasible on the property. And at this juncture I believe that an OSTDS is feasible on the property in question. Should the actual design submitted prove to be inconsistent with 381.0065, F.S., or 64E-6, F.A.C., then the permit will be rejected and the design will need to be modified to fit the parameters established in the law and code. Mr. Loewer, septic systems have been in use in this county for a very long time. There are other, larger systems in use in the county which have not created the contamination you speak of. Once again 1 am limited in my permitting authority by the provisions of 381.0065, F.S., and 64E-6, F.A.C. Should the submission meet the design criteria, then the permit shall be issued by this office. I have included your most recent correspondence with Mr. Finn below for your reference. "I have perused your answer. Naturally, my concern is mainly contamination of the drinking water. The volume and quality of the sewage is the integral issue. I am disappointed that you would accept Mr Herrera's computation of sewage flow without seeing the construction drawings and dismiss mine for the same reason. I will cut through the red tape and ask the only important question: When the groundwater is contaminated, who is responsible? You seem to think that no problem exists. My 39 years of experience would disagree. I would like to avert the problem before construction, before contamination of the groundwater and before my neighbors get cancer like in Dundalk. Douglas Loewer, PE" Sincerely, Justin Mahon Environmental Supervisor II Florida Department of Health in Collier County 239-252-5524 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY ENCUESTA DE SATISFACTION DEL CLIENTE I KLIYAN SATISFAKSYON SON DAJ Mission: To protect, promote & improve the health of all people in Florida through integrated state, county & community efforts. Vision: To be the Healthiest State in the Nation Values: (ICARE) I nnovation: We search for creative solutions and manage resources wisely. C ollaboration: We use teamwork to achieve common goals & solve problems. A ccountability: We perform with integrity & respect. R esponsiveness: We achieve our mission by serving our customers & engaging our partners. E xcellence: We promote quality outcomes through learning & continuous performance improvement. Please note: Florida has a very brood public records law. Most written communications to or from state officials regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e-mail communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure. 3 FinnTimoth From: FeyEric Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 9:39 AM To: Mahon, Justin D; FinnTimothy; Ashton Heidi Cc: VanBlaricom, Rachel M; OrthRichard; JosephitisErin; WeeksDavid Subject: RE: Temple Shalom Attachments: RE: Temple Shalom submissions; RE: Temple Shalom Justin, Thank you for your continued support on this. Ti m, I am taking the liberty of pulling Heidi into the loop on this since Mr. Loewer is implying legal ramifications for perceived public health risk associated with this zoning petition. Heidi, See below and attached for your awareness, Respectfully, Eric Fey, P.E. Principal Project Manager Co ier County Public utilities Engineering & Project Management Division Continuous improvement 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303, Naples, Florida 34112-5361 Phone: 239,252.1037 Cell: 239.572.0043 "HOW ARE WE DOING?" Please click here for our Customer Service Survey From: Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahon @flhealth.gov> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 5:11 PM To: douglasloewer20ll@comcast.net Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn @colliercountyfl.gov>; FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov>; VanBlaricom, Rachel M <Rachel.VanBlaricom@flhealth.gov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov>; WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Temple Shalom EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. Loewer, First and foremost I would like to clarify that I did not "accept" any of the design calculations submitted to me by Mr. Herrera. I simply stated that the design calcs submitted seem consistent with the sizing criteria established in Table I, 64E-6, F.A.C. You did not provide any of your calculations, but rather simply stated that you computed their sewage production differently. I am limited in my reviewing authority by 381.0065. Specifically 381.0065(4)(p) provides that no system will be reviewed without an application accompanied by all fees. Therefore, I am by no means reviewing any submission for a septic permit until all applicable plans and fees have been provided to this office. The engineering folks at Collier County simply asked me to provide if a septic system was feasible on the property. And at this juncture I believe that an OSTDS is feasible on the property in question. Should the actual design submitted prove to be inconsistent with 381.0065, F.S., or 64E-6, F.A.C., then the permit will be rejected and the design will need to be modified to fit the parameters established in the law and code. Mr. Loewer, septic systems have been in use in this county for a very long time. There are other, larger systems in use in the county which have not created the contamination you speak of. Once again I am limited in my permitting authority by the provisions of 381.0065, F.S., and 64E-6, F.A.C. Should the submission meet the design criteria, then the permit shall be issued by this office. I have included your most recent correspondence with Mr. Finn below for your reference. "I have perused your answer. Naturally, my concern is mainly contamination of the drinking water. The volume and quality of the sewage is the integral issue. I am disappointed that you would accept Mr Herrera's computation of sewage flow without seeing the construction drawings and dismiss mine for the same reason. I will cut through the red tape and ask the only important question: When the groundwater is contaminated, who is responsible? You seem to think that no problem exists. My 39 years of experience would disagree. would like to avert the problem before construction, before contamination of the groundwater and before my neighbors get cancer like in Dundalk. Douglas Loewer, PE" Sincerely, Justin Mahon Environmental Supervisor II Florida Department of Health in Collier County 239-252-5524 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY ENCUESTA DE SATISFACCION DEL CLIENTE KLIYAN SATISFAKSYON SONDAJ Mission: To protect, promote & improve the health of all people in Florida through integrated state, county & community efforts. Vision: To be the Healthiest State in the Nation Values: (iCARE) I onovotion: We search for creative solutions and manage resources wisely. C ollaboration: We use teamwork to achieve common goals & solve problems. A ccountability: We perform with integrity & respect. R esponsiveness: We achieve our mission by serving our customers & engaging our partners. E xcellence: We promote quality outcomes through learning & continuous performance improvement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Under Florida Law, Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from e-mail addresses are state officials regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon public records. If you request. Your e-mail communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure. do not want your e- mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. FinnTimoth From: FinnTimothy Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 2:20 PM To: FeyEric; JosephitisErin; OrthRichard Cc: WeeksDavid Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Attachments: Collier Co Septic.docx; ATT00001.htm Hi all, Please review the attached letter from Douglas Loewer and provide any input you may have to him regarding his concerns. Thank you From: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 11:31 AM To: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn @colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Mr. Loewer's latest letter. From: Douglas Loewer <douglasloewer2011@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 5:57 AM To: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks colliercount fl. ov> Subject: Fwd: Temple Shalom submissions EXTERNAL EMAIL. This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Did you receive this earlier in the week? Douglas Loewer, PE Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: DGL <douglasloewer2011@comcast.net> Date: December 10, 2019 at 10:20:56 AM EST To: davidweeks collier ov,net Subject: Temple Shalom submissions Attached are my comments and suggestions in the sewage area on the above referenced project. Please include the letter on the portal for both applications. Douglas Loewer, PE 1 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. FinnTimothy From: FeyEric Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 4:16 PM To: Mahon, Justin D Cc: FinnTimothy; JosephitisErin; OrthRichard; WeeksDavid Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Attachments: Collier Co Septic.docx,, ATT00001.htm; RE: Temple Shalom; RL: Temple Shalom Justin, Please read the attached letter from Douglas Loewer, P-E, outlining future septic system concerns regarding the proposed Temple Shalom expansion (PUDZ-PL20180003710). I am also attaching prior email correspondence to refresh your memory. Respectfully, Eric Fey, P.E. Principal Project Manager t co ter County Public Utilities Engineering & Project Management Division Continuous Improvement 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303, Naples, Florida 34112-5361 Phone: 239.252.1037 Cell: 239.572.0043 "How ARE WE DOING?" Please click here for our Customer Service Survey From: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn @colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 2:20 PM To: FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Hi all, Please review the attached letter from Douglas Loewer and provide any input you may have to him regarding his concerns. Thank you From: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 11:31 AM To: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn @col liercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Mr. Loewer's latest letter. From: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn @colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 2:20 PM To: FeyEric<Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov_>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrthRichard <Richard,Orth colliercount fl. ov> Cc: WeeksDavid<David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Hi all, Please review the attached letter from Douglas Loewer and provide any input you may have to him regarding his concerns. Thank you From: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 11:31 AM To: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Mr. Loewer's latest letter. From: Douglas Loewer <dou lasloewer2011 comcast.net> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 5:57 AM To: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks colliercount fl. ov> Subject: Fwd: Temple Shalom submissions EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Did you receive this earlier in the week? Douglas Loewer, PE Sent from my Whone Begin forwarded message: From: DGL <dou Iasloewer2011 comcast.net> Date: December 10, 2019 at 10:20:56 AM EST To: davidweeks@colliergov.net Subject: Temple Shalom submissions Attached are my comments and suggestions in the sewage area on the above referenced project. Please include the letter on the portal for both applications. Douglas Loewer, PE Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. FinnTimothy From: OrthRichard Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 1:56 PM To: FeyEric; Mahon, Justin D Cc: FinnTimothy; JosephitisErin; WeeksDavid Subject: RE: Temple Shalom submissions Tim and Eric, I recommend waiting to hear from DOH. Rick Orth Richard Orth, P.G., Sr. Environmental Specialist Collier County Growth Management Department Capital Project and Impact Fees Program Management Stormwater Management Section 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Ste 103, Naples, FL 34104 Office 239-252-5092, Cellular 239-634-9024 RichardOrth@CollierGov.Net From: FeyEric <Eric,Fey@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 4:16 PM To: Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahon@flhealth.gov> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions J ustin, Please read the attached letter from Douglas Loewer, P.E. outlining future septic system concerns regarding the proposed Temple Shalom expansion (PUDZ-PL20180003710). I am also attaching prior email correspondence to refresh your memory. Respectfully, Eric Fey, P.E. Principal Project Manager Co Ier C044"ty Public Utilities Engineering & Project Management Division Continuous Improvement 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303, Naples, Florida 34112-5361 Phone: 239.252,1037 Cell: 239.572.0043 "HOW ARE WE DOING?" Please click here for our Customer Service Survey From: Douglas Loewer <dou lasloewer20ll comcast.net> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 5.57 AM To: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks colliercount fl. ov> Subject: Fwd: Temple Shalom submissions EXTERNAL EMAI'_ This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Did you receive this earlier in the week? Douglas Loewer, PE Sent from my Whone Begin forwarded message: From: DGL <douglasloewer2011@comcast.net> Date: December 10, 2019 at 10:20:56 AM EST To: davidweeks@colliergov.net Subject: Temple Shalom submissions Attached are my comments and suggestions in the sewage area on the above referenced project, Please include the letter on the portal for both applications. Douglas Loewer, PE Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 9:01 AM To: Justin.Mahon@flhealth.gov Cc: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Hi Justin, Please see below as Mr. Loewer wants to meet. From: Douglas Loewer <douglasloewer2011@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 4:45 PM To: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@ colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: Temple Shalom submissions I would like to meet with you in person. My wife had a stroke and is paralyzed on the left side. I am her full time caregiver. Please set a date and time for us to meet and I will try to rearrange her schedule. Douglas Loewer, PE Sent from my iPhone From: Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahon@flhealth.gov> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 2:17 PM To: OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn @colliercountyfl.gov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov>; WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov>; VanBlaricom, Rachel M <Rachel.VanBlaricom@flhealth.gov> Subject: RE: Temple Shalom submissions Good afternoon all, I apologize for the delay in my response as I wanted to take some time to provide you the most thorough response as I possibly can to address the inquiry from Mr. Loewer. First and foremost, I wanted to clarify that I have not seen any proposed floor plans or septic site plans, so there are aspects of my response which will be dependent on the submission of plans. There is quite a bit to unpack here, but I'm going to try to address any of Mr. Lower's questions directly pertaining to my jurisdiction over the OSTDS permitting. 1. "Temple Shalom has computed their sewage production at 8,884 gpd. I compute their sewage at 15,458 gpd. The difference is mostly associated with food preparation spaces at both venues; 2 3 however the flow from the school should not be adjusted to 300 days and the assembly area in the new building has not been divided from the office building space." I cannot respond to the estimated flow of the facility without floor plans and proposed use. The simple talc. sheet Mr. Herrera provided would not be sufficient for official sizing. However, provided the floor plans do match the use proposed in the talc sheet, then I agree that the sizing parameters appear to be consistent with the sizing provided in Table I of 64E-6, F.A.C. In regards to the partial use of the school, I have already addressed this in my response with the engineer (Mr. Herrera) on 8/21/19. "Under the Pre-school sizing: the code does not provide guidance on deduction for inactive school days. So estimated flow would be 2375gpd for 200 students and 25 staff members provided there is no cafeteria or showers associated with the school." Additionally, the calc. sheet submitted by Mr. Herrera seems to include a peak flow loading factor. See comment from my original response in August: "I'm assuming "1.5 max. month" is referring to a loading factor for freeways? If so there is no loading factor required in septic system sizing. Loading factors are only considered with Grease trap sizing per 64E- 6.013(7)(d)1, F.A.C. You of course may oversize a system to meet what you believe peak flow to be, but there is no guidance that minimum specifications will be determined by estimated flow multiplied by a loading rate for anything other than establishments next to an interstate highway." "So, does that groundwater have sewage components in it or does the soil strata clean up the sewage before it gets to the well head? It depends on the geohydrology and will require extensive study to determine." Septic systems have proven to be an effective method of removing pathogens from wastewater for a very long time. There have been extensive studies to show that the soil beneath the drainfield, should it meet the effective soil requirements detailed in 64E-6, F.A.C., is effective in this process. A component of OSTDS permitting is a site evaluation completed by a licensed engineer with soils training (P.E.) or Certified Environmental Health Professional (CEHP). The site evaluation submitted will detail the soils beneath the proposed drainfield area and whether soil excavation and replacement will be necessary to meet drainfield installation standards. "The minimum standards for the distance between a domestic well and a septic field and system is 75 feet. However, this minimum distance is for a domestic residential well and a residential septic system."..." (1) Systems and septage stabilization facilities established after the effective date of the rule shall be placed no closer than the MINIMUM distances indicated for the following: (a) Seventy-five feet from a private potable well as defined in paragraph 64E-6.002(44)(a), F.A.C., or a multi -family water well as defined in paragraph 64E-6.002(44)(c), F.A.C. (b) One -hundred feet from a public drinking water well as defined in paragraph 64E- 6.002(44)(b), F.A.C., if such a well serves a facility with an estimated sewage flow of 2000 gallons or less per day. (c) Two -hundred feet from a public drinking water well as defined in paragraph 64E- 6.002(44)(b), F.A.C., if such a well serves a facility with an estimated sewage flow of more than 2000 gallons per day... Distances between a domestic well and a large volume commercial project must be much greater. The theory is that a residential septic flow will be cleaned up by its low flowrate through sand to the groundwater and then be disbursed as the geohydraulics of the groundwater flows through the subsurface materials. In fact, for this quantity of septic flow, I do not believe that the setback distance can be accommodated anywhere on the subject lot. In my opinion, even if 1a the septic field were placed in the middle of the lot, it would still be too close to existing wells to prevent contamination. These setbacks are the required minimum distances from proposed systems to wells. While the system will undoubtedly have an estimated sewage flow of more than 2000gpd, the facility is not serviced by well. To the best of my knowledge, the existing and proposed structures will be serviced by public utility water service. Therefore, the only wells requiring the minimum horizontal setback will be to the neighboring, private potable wells. The system will need to maintain a 75ft. setback to those wells. Looking at the aerial I don't see there being an issue achieving this setback. 4. "The soil is a coarse sand with stone at 2 - 3 feet down and groundwater is at 3 —4 feet down. A canal exists at 250 feet from the proposed site, which governs the geohyrology. The course sand in the septic fields will have to be excavated and replaced with finer sand. Course sand permits the water flow to be s❑ quick that the sewage cleaning done by the sand is much less than a finer sand. Both my neighbor's and my septic system are elevated, so the two Temple Shalom systems will most likely have to be elevated also." As stated in response #2 above, the site evaluation submitted will detail the soils beneath the proposed drainfield area and whether soil excavation and replacement will be necessary to meet drainfieid installation standards. However, our office often uses the USGS Web Soil Survey for baseline indicators before evaluating a particular site. According to the USGS Soil Survey, the entirety of the property is mapped as #128 — Pineda Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum. The typical soil profile is provided in the description for the soil complex. In this case a typical soil profile should show fine sand, not course sand, down to approximately 30" before hitting a moderately limited layer of loam, before the eventual bedrock at approximately 55 to 65 inches below grade. Should the site evaluation reflect this typical profile, soil replacement would not be necessary given the natural fine sand beneath grade. However, this area is often limited in septic elevation by the estimated wet season water table. 64F-6, F.A.C. provides that new systems must achieve a minimum of 24" of vertical separation between the estimated wet season water table and the bottom of drainfieid elevation. As Pineda Fine Sand is often associated with high water table elevations (3-18 inches below grade), this separation will undoubtedly result in a mounded septic system as is typical in that area (as well as most of Collier County). I have attached a graphic detailing the general characteristics of Pineda Fine Sand to this email. 5. "Because of the size of the system, two systems for the school and synagogue and another two systems will be required for the office building. The former will require 2- 5300 gallon tanks and the later will require 2-4300 gallon tanks. With the on -site rock being 2 — 3 feet down the installation of the tanks will be challenging"... "For trenches, the total field size will be 18488 SF for the Office Building and 13717 SF for the synagogue and school, for seepage beds, 14790 SF and 10974 SF. These areas do not include side slopes around the perimeter. The areas shown on the site plan are much too small." There is no way to calculate minimum tank capacity or drainfieid size without knowing the exact estimated sewage flaw. And I cannot determine the exact estimated sewage flow without reviewing the proposed floor plans. Minimum tank capacities and drainfieid sizing will be provided by me or a representative of this department with the issuance of the septic permit. 6. "Instead of septic tanks, a small package plant could be installed to improve the quality of the sewage before it is dumped into the groundwater. At the very least, a system to add oxygen to the system would be productive. Since a septic system is sealed from the surface, little oxygen 3 reaches the sewage in the tanks. Sewage comes complete with bacteria, both aerobic and anaerobic. In the septic system, anaerobic bacteria are dominant because of the low oxygen. Anaerobic bacteria act very slowly on sewage cleanup. Aerobic bacteria act much quicker. The amount of sewage cleanup performed by anaerobic bacteria in 30 days could be performed by aerobic bacteria in one day. Simply taking a large paddle and stirring the sewage and permitting surface air to be mixed in would greatly improve the quality of the sewage before subsurface disposal. Furthermore, the septic fields will last much, much longer when they receive a better quality sewage." Package plants are under the jurisdiction of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 381.0065(3)(a) provides that it is the responsibility of the Department of Health to permit systems with domestic flow up to 10000 gallons per day. At this juncture, provided the design calculations are correct, I do not see the estimated flow exceeding 10000 gallons per day. While I am not sure because I have never seen it happen before, I find it unlikely that DEP would permit a package plant for any system under the jurisdiction of the DOH. All things considered, given the proposed design calculations provided by Mr. Herrera and my knowledge of soils in the area, l believe that a septic sstem to service the new construction is feasible. While Mr. Loewer's letter is quite thorough, without any plans to suggest use other than what Mr. Herrera proposed, I do not see validity in his claims to ascertain that a septic system could not be installed on the lot. As you know, I am limited in my approval of permits by 381.0065, F.S. and 64E-6, F.A.C. As long as the design fits within the parameters established in those codes, the OSTDS permit shall be issued by this office. Please feel free to forward my response to Mr. Loewer with your response to his particular zoning questions. Sincerely, Justin Mahon Environmental Supervisor II Florida Department of Health in Collier County 239-2S2-5524 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY / ENCUESTA DE SATISFACCION DEL CLIENTE / KLIYAN SATISFAKSYON SONDAJ Mission: To protect, promote & improve the health of all people in Florida through integrated state, county & community efforts. Vision: To be the Healthiest State in the Nation Values: (ICARE) nnovation: We search for creative solutions and manage resources wisely. C collaboration: We use teamwork to achieve common goals & solve problems. Accountability: We perform with integrity & respect. R esponsiveness: We achieve our mission by serving our customers & engaging our partners. E xcellence: We promote quality outcomes through learning & continuous performance improvement. 4 Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state officials regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e-mail communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure. From: OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.sov> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 1:56 PM To: FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colIiercountyfl.gov>; Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahon fihealth. ov> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountvfl.go_v>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov>; WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.eov> Subject: RE: Temple Shalom submissions Tim and Eric, I recommend waiting to hear from DOH. Rick Orth Richard Orth, P.G., Sr. Environmental Specialist Collier County Growth Management Department Capital Project and Impact Fees Program Management Stormwater Management Section 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Ste 103, Naples, FL 34104 Office 239-252-5092, Cellular 239-634-9024 Richa rdOrth@CollierGov.Net From: FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountvfi.Rov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 4:16 PM To: Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahon@flhealth.gov> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.eov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; WeeksDavid <David. Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Justin, Please read the attached letter from Douglas Loewer, P.E. outlining future septic system concerns regarding the proposed Temple Shalom expansion (PUDZ-PL20180003710). I am also attaching prior email correspondence to refresh your memory. Respectfully, Eric Fey, P.E. Principal Project Manager Co ler County Public Utilities Engineering & Project Management Division Continuous Improvement 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303, Naples, Florida 34112-5361 Phone: 239.252.1037 Cell: 239.572.0043 "HOW ARE WE DOING?" Please click here for our Customer Service Survey From: FinnTimothy <Timoth .Finn colliercount fl. ov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 2:20 PM To: FeyEric <Eric, Fev@colliercount fl. ov>; JosephitisErin<E_rin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl,gov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountvfl gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Hi all, Please review the attached letter from Douglas Loewer and provide any input you may have to him regarding his concerns. Thank you From: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 11:31 AM To: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfi.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Mr. Loewer's latest letter. From: Douglas Loewer <douglasloewer2011@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 5:57 AM To: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Fwd: Temple Shalom submissions Did you receive this earlier in the week? Douglas Loewer, PE Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: DGL <douglasloewer2011@comcast.net> Date: December 10, 2019 at 10:20:56 AM EST To: davidweeks@colliergov.net Subject: Temple Shalom submissions Attached are my comments and suggestions in the sewage area on the above referenced project. Please include the letter on the portal for both applications. Douglas Loewer, PE 11 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a pubiic records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. emails 12-2019_DOH WW response G 1CDES Planning Service5VComprehensivelComp Planning GMP DATA1Comp Plan Amendments12019 Cycles and SmallsV2019 Cycle 2 - June1CP-19-2 Temple Shalom',Crrspndnc inc! DEO dw112-17-19 From: Mahon, Justin D <Justin.Mahon@flhealth.gov> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 5:11 PM To: douglasloewer20ll@comcast.net Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov>; FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov>, VanBlaricom, Rachel M <Rachel.VanBlaricom@flhealth.gov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov>; Weeks David <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Temple Shalom EXTERNAL EMAI:. This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. Loewer, First and foremost I would like to clarify that I did not "accept" any of the design calculations submitted to me by Mr. Herrera. I simply stated that the design calcs submitted seem consistent with the sizing criteria established in Table I, 64E-6, F,A.C. You did not provide any of your calculations, but rather simply stated that you computed their sewage production differently. I am limited in my reviewing authority by 381.0065. Specifically 381.0065(4)(p) provides that no system will be reviewed without an application accompanied by all fees. Therefore, I am by no means reviewing any submission for a septic permit until all applicable plans and fees have been provided to this office. The engineering folks at Collier County simply asked me to provide if a septic system was feasible on the property. And at this juncture I believe that an OSTDS is feasible on the property in question. Should the actual design submitted prove to be inconsistent with 381.0065, F.S., or 64E-6, F.A.C., then the permit will be rejected and the design will need to be modified to fit the parameters established in the law and code. Mr. Loewer, septic systems have been in use in this county for a very long time, There are other, larger systems in use in the county which have not created the contamination you speak of, Once again I am limited in my permitting authority by the provisions of 381.0065, F.S., and 64E-6, F.A.C. Should the submission meet the design criteria, then the permit shall be issued by this office. I have included your most recent correspondence with Mr. Finn below for your reference. "I have perused your answer. Naturally, my concern is mainly contamination of the drinking water. The volume and quality of the sewage is the integral issue. I am disappointed that you would accept Mr Herrera's computation of sewage flow without seeing the construction drawings and dismiss mine for the same reason. I will cut through the red tape and ask the only important question: When the groundwater is contaminated, who is responsible? You seem to think that no problem exists. My 39 years of experience would disagree. 1 would like to avert the problem before construction, before contamination of the groundwater and before my neighbors get cancer like in Dundalk. Douglas l.oewer, PE" Sincerely, Justin Mahon Environmental Supervisor II Florida Department of Health in Collier County 239-252-5524 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY / ENCUESTA DE SATISFACCION DEL CLIENTE / KLIYAN SATISFAKSYON SONDAJ Mission: To protect, promote & improve the health of all people in Florida through integrated state, county & community efforts. Vision: To be the Healthiest State in the Nation Values: (]CARE) nnovation: We search for creative solutions and manage resources wisely. C ollaboration: We use teamwork to achieve common goals & solve problems. Accountability: We perform with integrity & respect. R esponsiveness: We achieve our mission by serving our customers & engaging our partners. E xcellence: We promote quality outcomes through learning & continuous performance improvement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state officials regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e-mail communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure. email 12-19-19 WW-FDOH G:ICDES Planning Services4ComprehensivelComp Planning GMP DATA1Comp Plan AmendmentsW19 Cycles and Smalis&19 Cycle 2 - June1CP-19- 2 Temple ShalomlCrrspndnc incl DEO dw112-19-19 ❑ouglas Loewer 4780 Pine Ridge Road Naples, Florida 34119 ❑ouglasloewer2D11 @comcast.net 443 880 4581 January 3, 2020 Tim Finn Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning ❑ivision 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Temple Shalom Submission Mr. Finn : Please include this letter in both Temple Shalom submissions on the County Portal. Please also provide this letter to any reviewer and other agency that would normally provide expertise to the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners. I would appreciate their input so that I can become familiar with local design criteria. This letter concerns the ❑n site parking criteria. My wife and I are ❑pposed to the Temple Shalom Project. We believe that it is premature. am a professional engineer licensed in Florida since 1983. 1 am registered in 5 other states but spent most ❑f my professional career on the eastern shore of Maryland, Delaware and Virginia. I have made thousands of presentations to Planning Commissions, Town Councils, County Commissioners, Zoning Appeals committees, Zoning Commissioners, State Agencies, etc. The Temple Shalom Project is proposing t❑ change the parking requirements in the Code that are normally required under commercial zoning as part of their application from what the County would normally mandate. The new building is proposed t❑ have parking based upon 1 space per 200 square feet of building (22,000 SF of building) or 110 spaces, which are provided on the site plan. However, there are tw❑ assembly areas in the building. The assembly requirements are not included in their computations. The assembly area A is 1770 SF, and assembly area B is 1770 SF, totaling 3540 SF. Subtracting the 3540 SF from the 22,000 SF yields 18,46❑ SF of office space. Parking for the assembly area is 3 spaces per 7 seats. Assembly area A has 232 seats and assembly area B has 160 seats, totaling 392 seats. Therefore, the assembly areas need 168 spaces. The ❑ffice space is computed at 1 space per 300 SF, yielding 62 spaces. The total parking requirements should be 230 spaces. So, less than one half the normally required parking is provided for the new building. Since the Temple Shalom property is included in the application, the existing uses should have the latest Code applied for their parking requirements. Temple Shalom has an assembly area for 302 seats. At 3 parking spaces per 7 seats, the synagogue would require 13❑ parking spaces. The daycare will have 200 students. At 1 space per 10 students for daycare, 20 parking spaces are required. At 1 space per employee, 25 employees would require 25 parking spaces. There are also certain areas that do not apply t❑ the synagogue or the school. These areas should be computed at 1 space per 300 SF. I estimate that square footage at 23,200 SF ( I d❑ not have plans, s❑ this is a takeoff of the Exhibit C provided as part of their application). Those areas would require 78 paved spaces. So, the total ❑f those 3 areas require 253 parking spaces. There are 89 paved spaces on the synagogue and daycare portion. Of the 89 spaces, 13 are handicapped. There appears to be 158 grassed parking spaces. The total spaces are 247. My estimate of office space must be close. The computations are within 6 spaces of what I estimated would be required. Under the parking requirements of the Collier County Land Development Code, daycare and preschool are listed separately from the schools, so the 70% grassed parking that is available for religious organizations and schools, would only apply to the synagogue building parking of 130 spaces. Therefore, 91 could be grassed and 39 paved. So, the extra 07 grassed parking spaces would not count toward the parking requirement unless they were paved. There is another County Code requirement that grassed parking must be undercut and prepared for the weight of cars and the pivoting of tires. The current grassed lot has little "grass" on it. When it rains, many of the spaces become muddy. The requirements for grassed parking were. different in 1991, so the current grassed parking spaces will have to be reworked to qualify as grassed parking under the new Code. I am worried that the 70% grassed parking extends to all parking on the site and not just the synagogue. I am also worried that the 70% grassed parking be considered grass in the stormwater computations. The Code calls for only 15% of the grassed parking can be considered grassed parking per stormwater Codes or 19 spaces. The rest would be considered impervious for stormwater computations. Even the 19 spaces would not fall under the landscape grass stormwater category because it is undercut with a material to support vehicles. If the 70% grassed parking is approved, the Board should determine what the 70% applies to ( synagogue, daycare, office space, office building). Does the new Code apply to the old parking lot as far as undercutting and amount of grassed parking? Is the Board going to approve the new building for a reduction from 230 parking spaces to 110 spaces or will that determination be left up to the reviewers? Many times during the year, parking is forced onto the shoulders of Pine Ridge Road during a synagogue event. The assembly area of the new building will increase the overflow. Temple Shalom and the Federation have both said that the new assembly area will give them the option of providing more services to the community, some at the same time. The reduction in parking will exacerbate the current overflow parking onto Pine Ridge Road. I would hope that the Planning Commission will increase the parking to the required level if they give approval to the Temple Shalom submittals. Or, in the alternative, let the County reviewers make the decision as to the amount of parking for the new building based upon the County Code. Sincerely, ❑ouglas Loewer, PE FinnTimoth From: OrthRichard Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 5:58 PM To: WeeksDavid Cc: FinnTimothy; KurtzGerald; PattersonAmy Subject: RE: Temple Shalom submissions David, I reviewed this project in reference to impacts to our stormwater conveyance systems and adjacent properties and approved the project. The letter specifically discusses management of the internal stormwater flows in relationship to the project density to successfully achieve treatment and attenuation; and need for wastewater concurrency due to the aquifer characteristics in that specific area for what is being proposed in relationship to what currently exists in the area. These stormwater issues are best addressed at time of SDP or PPL, If requested through proper channels, I can provide technical support in understand the technical specifics and merits of his letter (attached). Sincerely, Rick Orth WN Collier Co TS st water,docx Richard Orth, P.G., Sr. Environmental Specialist Collier County Growth Management Department Capital Project and Impact Fees Program Management Stormwater Management Section 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Ste 103, Naples, FL 34104 Office 239-252-5092, Cellular 239-634-9024 RichardOrth@CollierGov.Net From: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 3:14 PM To: OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom submissions Hi Rick, At request of the letter writer, I am forwarding this letter to you. Pertains to Temple Shalom GMPA PL20180003708 and PUD PL20180003710. David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager Collier County Government, Growth Management Department Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 phone:239-252-2306; E-fax:239-252-6689 email: david.weeks@colliercoune.gov ; Collier County website: www.colliercountyfl.gov NOTE. New email address (above) as of December 9, 2017. "Tel/ us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit,ly/CollierZoning " << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> -----Original Message ----- From: DGL <douglasloewer2011@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 1:52 PM To: WeeksDavid <David.Weeks@coliiercountyfl.gov> Subject: Temple Shalom submissions EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Attached are my comments on stormwater and drainage for the Temple Shalom submission. Please include in both Temple Shalom submissions. Thanx Douglas Loewer, PE << File: Collier Co TS st water.docx >> << File: ATT00001.txt >> Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records. if you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request. do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Douglas Loewer 4780 Pine Ridge Road Naples, Florida 34119 Douglasloewer2011 @comcast.net 443 880 4581 January 10, 2020 Tim Finn Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe ❑rive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Temple Shalom Submission Mr. Finn : Please include this letter in both Temple Shalom submissions on the County Portal. Please also provide this letter to any reviewer and other agency that would normally provide expertise to the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners. I would appreciate their input so that I can become familiar with local design criteria. This letter will address the storm water and drainage issues on the existing Temple Shalom buildings and the proposed office building. I am a professional engineer licensed in Florida since 1983. 1 am registered in 5 other states but spent most of my professional career on the eastern shore of Maryland, ❑elaware and Virginia. My specialty is sewage flow, septic fields, drainage and stormwater management. Ocean City, Maryland has many ❑f the same design challenges as Collier County, except the mean elevation is 6'. I helped write many ❑f the stormwater ordinances with the local municipalities and helped close big holes in other ordinances before they became law. The existing stormwater and drainage situation will be completely changed with the new building construction. Currently, no stormwater is leaving the site. N❑ water leaves the site through the piped outfall at the westerly boundary of the existing developed property. The pipe runs from the end of two stormwater ditches onto the State right of way along Pine Ridge Road. The ditch along Pine Ridge Road is not functioning for stormwater management. It has not been maintained and is very overgrown. Any overload of stormwater drains into the undeveloped lot proposed for the new office building and dissipates into the vegetation and subsoil. My lot and house is directly to the west of that undeveloped lot. The design of the stormwater for the synagogue and daycare dates back to 1991 and was not maintained. The requirements in 2019 are much stricter than 1991. Since the daycare is being expanded and the entire property is included in the applications, the synagogue and daycare areas should be redesigned under the new Code. Grandfathering the existing project should not be an ❑ption. Particularly, since the north south ditch (the other stormwater ditch) is being removed as part of the new construction. There does not appear to be any new stormwater design for the synagogue and daycare stormwater runoff on the site plan. With the possibility of boring you, I will explain the basics of stormwater design and the pitfalls that can provide poor design and outcome. Almost all stormwater computations are based on the Rationale Formula. The amount of storage required is based upon the difference between the before and after development computations. The Rationale Formula is Q =c I A, where Q is the quantity of runoff, I is the design intensity of the rainfall, A is the area of the site and c accounts for all of the variables. The Area, A, remains the same in the before and after conditions, as does the rainfall Intensity, I. The Quantity, Q, is what you are comparing t❑ arrive at your storage requirements. To simplify, the quantity after development minus the quantity before development equals the volume of water which must be stored onsite to be released int❑ the outfall at the rate of the before condition or percolate into the subsoil. So, all the variance between the before and after condition is invested in the c and amplified by the same Intensity and Area numbers. Unfortunately, c can be manipulated to provide less storage than is necessary, which, ultimately, causes flooding. Two of the main attributes of c are the Time of Concentration and the surface type that the stormwater is running across. ❑bviously, runoff velocity is much greater over asphalt than it is through a heavily wooded area. The best way to assure the correct outcome of the quantity is to make the route of water in the before and after condition about the same. I did a presentation to a municipality of how stormwater was computed before they passed their ordinance. The first outcome was that no stormwater was necessary on the site. The second outcome was that so much volume was required for stormwater storage that there was no room for the parking and the building. I will briefly describe how this is accomplished. Let say that your lot is square, 1000' by 1000', and is situated square with north, east, south, and west sidelines. The northeast corner is the highest elevation, 100.00' and the southwest corner is the lowest elevation, 80.00'. For the ease of computations, the grade falls at a constant rate from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. In the before condition, it is heavily wooded. The developed condition is a commercial development with its buildings, parking, landscaping, etc. The subsoil is sandy with rock 2-3 feet below the surface in both before and after conditions. In the before condition, the distance ❑f flow is 1414' with 20.00' ❑f elevation change. In the after development condition, the elevation change is still 20.00', but the distance varies with the design. If the computation is going t❑ be manipulated, the goal would be for the time ❑f concentration between the before and after conditions be as close as possible. In other words, the time for the runoff to pass across the lot in the before condition should be as short as possible and the after condition be as long as possible. The means to shorten the before condition can be accomplished by choosing a different permeability of the soil, a different roughness ❑f the soil and a different type of vegetation. Let's say the proper before calculation for time would be 3❑ minutes and the manipulated computation would be 25 minutes. In the after condition, a proper computation would attempt to hold the same distance and route of the before condition. Let's say the after condition is now asphalted and has a building on it. The direct path from northeast to southwest over asphalt for the after condition would yield a 10 minute time. However, the path can be manipulated. The runoff can be redirected to grassed swales (even choosing the thickness of the grass can be manipulated), run through pipes with a shallow grade, segment the flow so some flow portions only have 1 ' of elevation change t❑ slow the flow and, frequently, have a weir t❑ drop the elevation all in ❑ne place, so there is less grade along the flow line. There would be many, many means of slowing the flow. Let's say the flow from the northeast corner is directed to the northwest corner (1000'), then goes though a pipe for 500' to the center of the lot, then into a ditch for 500' to the easterly property line, then into a pond for 100' and then a 400' ditch along the easterly line and then through a ditch the 1000' across the southerly property line. That distance is now 3500 ` of flow and none of it is across asphalt or a building. The manipulated time of flow would be let's say 20 minutes. Although the comparison c variable is not directly proportional to the times computed above, the difference in time greatly effects the c. In the above comparison the proper before and after times are 30 minutes and 10 minutes, a difference of 2❑ minutes. The manipulated times are 25 and 20 minutes, a difference of 5 minutes. The storage amount is computed based on this time number. If the 20 minutes is used, the neighbors' property and the road right of way do not get flooded. Use the 5 minutes and flooding will occur; however, the cost of the project will be much less because the storage is much less. Many times the project must be scaled back so that there is enough room for building, parking and stormwater pond or detention area. On the lot where the office building is proposed, the highest elevation is probably the southeast corner. The outfall to the County right of way is on the northeast corner and is the same outfall as the synagogue is now using (the existing ditch line that is being abandoned). The proposed flow line runs from the southeast corner, around the back of the building, into a pond, into a ditch along the westerly side ❑f the property and, then, into a ditch along the northerly boundary with Pine Ridge Road. The distance in the before condition is 585'. The distance in the after condition will be about 1200'. The design completely avoids impervious areas. The pond is 1' deep with a weir drop design int❑ a ditch. The ❑ffice building site will drain to the Pine Ridge Road right of way at the northeast corner. Then, the runoff will run westerly along the right of way about 300'. The water then runs northerly under Pine Ridge Road. All of the drainage onto the Pine Ridge Road right of way from adjacent properties on both sides of the road for at least one half mile (plus the right of way drainage on both sides of the road) drains westerly along the road ditch lines. The southerly right of way ditch line is diverted to the northerly ditch line by pipes under Pine Ridge Road. The proposed flow from the proposed submissions joins the watershed drainage at that spot 2 houses from the canal in a constricted ditch. The combination of the flows then continues down the northerly road ditch to the canal. If the flow is not calculated properly on the proposed site, the flow will jump the bank at the constriction and continue diagonally across the front yards of the two properties. Remember, the synagogue property also drains out the same outfall. There is no flow from the synagogue property now, but, when the office building is finished the water currently dissipating into that office building lot will add to the flow. The proposed pond is on the westerly side of the property. If the pond is under designed and overflows, the drainage will be across my property toward the canal and will pond on the back ❑f my lot because my neighbors' lot (between my lot and the canal) has a higher elevation than my lot. The water ponding on my property will fill up my storm water pond and run across the property to my south to get to the canal. The submission also requests a 70% grassed parking exemption. There is a section of the Code that states that, if the 70% grassed parking is used, the amount over 15% has to be considered impervious parking when computing the stormwater calculations. Does this stormwater section still apply if you approve the parking exemption and do not specifically address the impervious section? Under permitted uses for the CFPUD application, there is a section for PRESERVE, allowable uses. Number 4 states: Water management and water management structures, as per LDC requirements. Earlier in this letter, I described manipulation of stormwater computations. Using preserve area for stormwater management defeats the reason for having the preserve area at all. ❑rainage and stormwater management will be critical to the success of the project. Grassed parking only works if it is dry. Poor drainage will make grassed parking soggy and muddy. Replacing reserve areas with stormwater ponds defeats the reserve area statute. The reserve area is a place where mistakes in drainage can dissipate, but not if they are replaced by stormwater structures. A stormwater management plan and drainage plan that handles the whole site should be required. Sub areas of the two lot synagogue and daycare and the single lot proposed office building should be incorporated into this design, in case the tenants of the new office building want it to split off. Sincerely, Douglas Loewer, PE ❑ouglas Loewer 478❑ Pine Ridge Road Naples, Florida 34119 Douglasloewer2011 @comcast.net 443 880 4581 February 15, 2020 Tim Finn Collier County Growth Management ❑epartment Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Temple Shalom Submission Mr. Finn : Please include this letter in both Temple Shalom submissions on the County Portal. Please also provide this letter to any reviewer and other agency that would normally provide expertise to the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners. I would appreciate their input so that I can become familiar with local design criteria. This letter is a conclusion on the existing Temple Shalom buildings and the proposed office building application. I am a professional engineer licensed in Florida since 1983. 1 am registered in 5 other states but spent most of my professional career on the eastern shore of Maryland, Delaware and Virginia. In the jurisdictions that I have practiced, when a modification to existing zoning is necessary, the other sections of the respective Codes are applied as much as possible. In Collier County, apparently, Temple Shalom can change all factors when they modify zoning this way. GradyMinor says that the items of my concern will be addressed during the design and permitting stage and not at the PU❑ and establishment of a new "zoning". Note that the existing buildings are included in this application. This usually means that the current Code will be applied to the existing project and they will not be "grandfathered" under the Code that applied when the building was first built in 1991. The following items appear to be changed as part of these actions currently before the Board, which are not consistent with the general commercial section of the zoning Code: 1. Number of parking spaces for the new building. 2. Number of parking spaces required for the synagogue and daycare. 3. Amount of grassed parking. (70% requested) 4. No upgrade ❑f existing grassed parking to current Code Standards. 5. Permit structural and non-structural storm water structures within preserve areas. 6. Building setback lines 7. Height restrictions These items become the basis of the new zoning and the design stage of the project. These items will not be modified during design after approval ❑f the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners. The parking requirements for number of spaces are not from the regular commercial parking in the Code, but are markedly reduced from 230 spaces to 110 spaces because ❑f the assembly areas. See parking letter. Since there is already parking on the shoulders of Pine Ridge Road during synagogue events, a two event day will spill 150 cars onto the road right of way. Temple Shalom will say that there is n❑ plans to have events at both assembly areas at the same time. If that were the case, there would be no need for the second assembly area. Let me present a worst case scenario. There are two events filling both assembly areas, 700 people plus presenters, caterers and booth vendors. There are 150 cars ❑n the shoulder of Pine Ridge Road because the parking lots are full. The Federation says that they service 100 patrons per day. Up to 83% of the people that they service are over 70 years old. The assemblies usually last for many hours or all day. There is a steep grassed ditch slope on the Pine Ridge Road with a three foot asphalt strip on the edge of the vehicular travel way, The 100 seniors' cars will have to park some distance from the building on the shoulder. I do not think that having those seniors can safely get to the building for services. The commercial parking requirements should not be waived for this project. The Collier County Code permits 70% grassed parking for synagogues and schools. The daycare is not considered a school under parking regulations. Daycare has a separate line item and there is no preschool listed under the school required parking in the Code. And the proposed office building and assembly area obviously do not qualify for grassed parking. Therefore, the only grassed parking should relate to the synagogue parking and not the office building and daycare, i.e., 91 spaces. The existing grassed parking was not constructed in accordance with the current County Code. The current grassed parking should be undercut and replaced in accordance with the procedures described in the Code, Approval of these submissions will bypass the construction of a proper grassed parking lot. The current grassed parking area gets very muddy and forces attendees out onto the Pine Ridge Road right of way shoulder on both sides of the road. Under the modifications, Temple Shalom has requested that stormwater management and structural elements of the stormwater requirements could be placed in the reserved preserve areas. If this modification is granted, there would be very little preserve area remaining. The stormwater design for the new building is shown on the drawings. The application has remained silent on how the existing project will handle the stormwater issue. Half the existing stormwater ditches are overgrown and unusable and the other half are being removed for the new building construction. There is also no upgrade from the 1991 stormwater design criteria. Height restrictions and zoning setbacks are also changing from comparable commercial zoning. I am not sure why 40 feet in height for a two story building is appropriate, particularly, since it is slab on grade construction. I als❑ do not believe that disposing of between 9,000 and 18,000 gpd of sewage that is only treated by a septic tank for sewage is appropriate when all the adjoining properties are on domestic well systems, especially, with the sprinkler systems. Secondary treatment should be required. The project as submitted is presented as a synagogue and campus for the synagogue. It is actually three projects on one three lot parcel, a synagogue, a daycare and an office building. The office building could be sold off separately t❑ another occupancy that is not associated with a religious ❑rder, so it should be designed to be freestanding from the other two existing uses. Then, this process would not have to be resubmitted to split off the office building. If approved, i believe that these submissions should only pertain to the bare bones changes for the special commercial zoning in a residential area and not give the applicant special consideration for a wish list. Please let the reviewers do their job and make those decisions. Do not design the project by allowing critical issues to be decided without analyzing how the whole puzzle fits together. Sincerely, Douglas Loewer, PE Douglas Loewer 4780 Pine Ridge Road Naples, Florida 34119 Douglasloewer2011 @comcast.net 443 880 4581 February 19, 202❑ Tim Finn Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Temple Shalom Submission Mr. Finn : Please include this letter in both Temple Shalom submissions on the County Portal. This letter is a revision to the earlier "Septic" letter. I missed the second assembly area in the new office building (the print is very small), s❑ I had to add 232 seats t❑ the computation. Temple Shalom has computed their sewage production at 8,884 gpd. I compute their sewage now at 17,844 gpd. At 8,884 gpd, the office building project will be the equivalent of 25+ houses; at 17,844 gpd, 51 houses. Because of the size of the system, tw❑ systems for the school and synagogue and another tw❑ systems will be required for the office building. The former will require 2 - 5300 gallon tanks and the later will require 2 - 5300 gallon tanks. For trenches, the total field size will be 18588 SF for the Office Building and 18488 SF for the synagogue and school. For seepage beds, 14950 and 14790. The areas shown on the site plan are much too small. Mr. McMahon of the Collier County Health Department wrote a letter concerning Mr Herrera and my computations. Mr McMahon said that a septic system would work. I agree. There is an area of septic influence around a septic field. That influence will extend ont❑ the neighboring properties. In this design instance, I d❑ not believe that 18,000 gpd can be dumped safely into the groundwater without secondary treatment. Mr Herrera stated that secondary treatment was not an option. 1 have enclosed my complete computation sheet which is what Mr. McMahon wanted. Sincerely, Douglas Loewer, PE Cc: Justin McMahon Temple Shalom Septic Flow Computations Revised February 19, 2020 Existing Condition Proposed Project Seats Flow Total Seats Flow Total Per seat Flow Per seat Flow Synagogue Auditorium 302 3 906 Gpd 302 3 906 Gpd Aud w/ Food 302 5 1510 Gpd 302 5 1510 Gpd Daycare Children 70 10 700 Gpd 200 10 2000 Gpd Teachers 20 15 300 Gpd 25 15 375 Gpd Food 90 5 450 Gpd 225 5 1125 Gpd Total 3866 Gpd Total 5916 Gpd Peak 150% 5799 Gpd Peak 150% 8874 Gpd Sq Ft Proposed building 22000 Auditorium 3540 Offices 18460 Federation Offices 18460 15/100sf 2769 Gpd Off w/ food 15 employees 15 5 75 Gpd Auditorium 392 3 1176 Gpd Aud w/food 392 5 1960 Gpd Total 5980 Gpd Peak 150% 8970 Gpd Grand Total 17844 Gpd 350 Per house 51 Houses Septic Tank 1500 gal Existing Grease Trap 300 gal Existing Septic Field Size Max Max Max Max Max Width Length Spacing Sq ft Flow Trench 0.8 Gal per sf 3 100 5 5000 Bed 0.6 Gal per sf 1500 Trench Flow SF Max SF # of Field Size Field Size Field Size Required Trench Trenches Width Length Sq Ft Existing 5799 7249 Greater than 5000 2 Fields 2 Fields 3624 300 12 60 100 6041 SF each 12081 SF Tota I Prop ch & do 8874 11093 Greater than 5000 19488 2 Fields 5546 300 19 97 100 9744 SF each 19488 SF Total Prop off bldg 8970 11213 Greater than 5000 18688 2 Fields 5606 300 19 93 100 9344 SF each 18688 SF Total Bed Flow SF Max SF # of SF per Bed Size Required Allowed Beds Bed Square Existing 5799 9665 1500 7 1381 37 by 37 Prop ch & do 8874 14790 1500 10 1479 39 by 39 14790 SF Prop off bldg 8970 14950 1500 10 1495 39 by 39 14950 SF Septic Tank Size Flow # Tanks Size Actual Gal Existing 5799 2 1 tank 1500 2899.5 Pertank 3700 Prop ch & do 8874 2 4437 Pertank 5300 Prop off bldg 8970 2 4485 Pertank 5300 Temple Shalom CFPUD (PL20180003710) Application and Supporting Documents October 11, 2020 CCPC Hearing ® GradyMinor Civf] Fngfneem • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects June 26, 2019 Mr. Gilbert Martinez, AICP Collier County Growth Management Division/ Planning and Regulation Land Development Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Collier County Application for Public Hearing, Temple Shalom CFPUD Rezone — PL20180002710, Submittal 1 Dear Mr. Martinez: A Collier County application for Public Hearing for PUD Rezone for property located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 0.6± miles west of Collier Boulevard is being filed electronically for review. This application proposes to rezone a 13.5+/- acre parcel to allow a church, up to 22,000 square feet of building area for religious & social organizations and maximum 200 student pre- school/day care uses. A companion small-scale amendment (PL20180003708) is also being filed for review. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover Letter 2. Application for PUD Rezone 3. Evaluation Criteria 4. Pre -application meeting notes 5. Affidavit of Authorization 6. Property Ownership Disclosure Form 7. Covenant of Unified Control 8. Addressing Checklist 9. Warranty Deed(s) 10. Boundary Survey 11. Current Aerial Photograph Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Mr. Gilbert Martinez, AICP RE: Collier County Application for Public Hearing, Temple Shalom CFPUD Rezone — PL20180002710, Submittal 1 June 26, 2019 Page 2 of 2 12. Exhibit 1 Water and Sewer Demand 13. Environmental Data 14. Traffic Impact Study 15. Exhibits A-F 16. Deviation Justification Please feel free to contact Rich Yovanovich at 435-3535 or me should you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Temple Shalom Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Clay Brooker, Cheffy Passidomo Richard D. Yovanovich GradyMinor File CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ✓❑ PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. Name of Property Owner(s): APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Temple Shalom, Inc. Name of Applicant if different than owner Temple Shalom, Inc. Address: 4630 Pine Ridge Road City: Naples Telephone: 239-455-3030 Cell: E-Mail Address: info@naplestemple.org Name of Agent: D. Wayne Arnold / Firm: Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rey Telephone: 239-947-1144 Cell: State: FL ZIP: 34119-4063 Fax: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. / Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. City: Bonita Sprins State: FL Fax: ZIP: 34134 E-Mail Address: warnold@gradyminor.com / ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. February 1, 2019 Page 1 of 11 COAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ',EZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: E, Estates Zoning district(s) to the Temple Shalom CFPUD zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Temple Shalom Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Religious facilities, childcare and social organizations Original PUD Name: N.A. Ordinance No.: N.A. PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range:15 /49 /26 Lot: N.A. Block: N.A. Subdivision: Golden Gate Estates Unit 26 TR 64, 65 & 68 Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: 7 Page #: Size of Property: 990+/- Please see Exhibit D of the PUD document 15-16 property I.D. Number: 37926120008 ft. x 585+/- ft. = 589,366.8+/- Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 13.53+/- Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 4630 Pine Ridge Road South side of Pine Ridge Road, east of Santa Barbara Blvd. PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 Q ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑■ Community Facilities ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other: ❑ Industrial February 1, 2019 Page 2 of 11 COAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N E, Estates Pine Ridge Road ROW and Residential S E, Estates Residential E E, Estates Residential W E, Estates Residential If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: N.A. /N.A. /N.A. Lot: N.A. Block: N.A. Subdivision: N.A. Plat Book: N•A• Page #: N•A• Property I.D. Number: N.A. Metes & Bounds Description: N.A. ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: N.A. Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: City: State: ZIP: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: February 1, 2019 Page 3 of 11 Coder Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net EVALUATION CRITERIA 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. February 1, 2019 Page 4 of 11 COAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? N.A. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING Ot DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. February 1, 2019 Page 5 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Temple Shalom, Inc. Address: 4630 Pine Ridge Road Telephone: 239-455-3030 Cell: E-Mail Address: info@naplestemple.org City: Naples State: FL Fax: Address of Subject Property (If available): 4630 Pine Ridge Road City: State: ZIP: PROPERTY INFORMATION ZIP: 34119-4063 Section/Township/Range: 15 /49 /26 Lot: N.A. Block: N.A. Subdivision: Golden Gate Estates Unit 26, Tr 64, 65 & 68 Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: 7 Page #: Please see Exhibit D of the PUD document 15-16 property I.D. Number: 37926120008 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System ❑ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System x❑ I TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I Check applicable system: a. County Utility System x❑ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) ❑ Total Population to be Served: Please see attached Exhibit 1 Water Sewer Demands Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: See Exh. 1 Average Daily: See Exh. 1 B. Sewer -Peak: Notapplicable Average Daily: Notapplicable If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: Currently connected. February 1, 2019 Page 6 of 11 CACT Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. N.A. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Please see Utility Dedication Statement Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. February 1, 2019 Page 7 of 11 Coder Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for planned unit development ( PUD) zoning. We hereby designate , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner Owner Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this who is personally known to me or has produced Printed Name day of 201_ by as identification. Notary Public (Name typed, printed or stamped) February 1, 2019 Page 8 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary ❑ 0 ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑✓ Li Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ✓❑ ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ✓❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ✓ ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1L1✓❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ✓❑ ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ✓❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 71 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ ✓ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 Ll ❑✓ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ✓❑ ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ ❑✓ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ Checklist continues on next page February 1, 2019 Page 9 of 11 COAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ 11 ❑✓ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ ✓❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 I ❑ I E✓ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 11 ❑ 1 ✓ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: ❑ Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses ❑ Exhibit B: Development Standards ❑ Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code ❑ Exhibit D: Legal Description ❑ Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each ❑ Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams & David Berra ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: 4SSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION ❑ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 0 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre X Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Xi Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 X Transportation Review Fees: (D Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. Q Minor Study Review: $750.00 p Major Study Review $1,500.00 February 1, 2019 Page 10 of 11 Coder Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net X Legal Advertising Fees: X CCPC: $1,125.00 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 X BCC: $500.00 F1 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5`" and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. June 26, 2019 Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Printed named of signing party February 1, 2019 Page 11 of 11 Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) (PL20180003710) Evaluation Criteria Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staffs analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. Narrative Temple Shalom owns 13.5+/- acres of property located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately % mile west of Collier Boulevard. The Temple initially received provisional use approval for a temple and temple related facilities (religious facilities) in 1989 on 9+/- acres of its property. Its original application included all 13.5+/- acres; however, because the Temple did not have more specific plans for the westernmost portion (Tract 64) of the property, the County Commission requested removal of that portion of the site from the provisional use application. The Temple was instructed to amend the conditional use once it decided upon more specific plans for use of Tract 64. In 1993, the Temple received conditional use approval for a childcare center on the 9+/- acres that had been developed with the Temple and associated uses (Resolution #93- 290). The original conditional use for the childcare facility limited enrollment to 70 children. However, due to increased demand in the area of non -denominational childcare, the number of children utilizing the Temple's childcare facility has increased over the years, with the County's knowledge. Indeed, in 2000, the Temple added approximately 21,000 square feet to its facilities, pursuant to SDP-90-128(E), to accommodate the increased demand. This past year, approximately 180 students utilized the childcare facility. The CFPUD proposed by this rezone application limits enrollment to 200 students to reflect the increased demand and utilization. Collier County approved the 1989 provisional use and the 1993 conditional use prior to the 2000 adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP). Those pre-existing uses have been deemed consistent by policy with the GGAMP. However, the Temple does not meet the GGAMP's locational criteria for churches and similar uses to obtain conditional use approval. Accordingly, a companion Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) has been filed with this CFPUD rezone application, which proposes to create a subdistrict in the GGAMP to permit religious facilities, childcare and social organization uses on the Temple's property. January 17, 2020 W GradyMinor Page 1 of 9 JFGNA-18 Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Ft, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) (PL20180003710) Evaluation Criteria As mentioned above, this CFPUD rezone application proposes to increase the number of students for the childcare facility to a maximum of 200. The childcare facility would continue to be limited to Tracts 65 and 68. However, the rezone application also proposes to permit the religious and social organization uses on the entire 13.5+/- property (Tracts 64, 65 and 68). Temple Shalom provides congregants with a place to worship, observe religious studies and to provide a social resource for the Jewish faith. As part of its overall program activities, Temple Shalom partners with other Jewish faith agencies such as the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to provide a variety of services beyond worship or child day care. Most of these activities occur in some form presently at the Temple's campus and include: • Youth Activities • Philanthropic Activities • Social Action Activities • Volunteer Activities • Community Service • Community Events • Community Outreach • Interfaith Outreach • Men's and Women's Group Activities • Semi -catered Community Events • Book Lectures • Religious administrative functions such as administration, accounting, staff offices, and fund raising • Adult Jewish Education programs • Israel Education • Judaic Discussion Groups Obtaining the CFPUD and companion GMPA approval for religious facilities and related activities will permit the Temple and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples an opportunity to combine efforts to expand their community outreach for Jewish religious and cultural programming in a single campus environment, to meet the demands of the increasing population of those of the Jewish faith in Collier County. The conceptual master plan proposes no changes to the existing campus facilities, but it identifies the proposed new facilities on the undeveloped portion of the campus (Tract 64) for the above - mentioned non -worship uses. The new facilities include a building of approximately 22,000 square feet with associated parking, accessory outdoor patios, and gathering spaces for the variety of January 17, 2020 W GradyMinor Page 2 of 9 JFGNA-18 Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Ft, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) (PL20180003710) Evaluation Criteria services and events related to the Jewish Federation and Temple's mission to provide religious, cultural and social resources for the Jewish community. The property falls within the GGAMP and is zoned Estates. While the eastern portion of the property (Tracts 65 and 68) possesses conditional use approval (as previously explained), the western portion of the property (Tract 64) does not meet the locational criteria for a conditional use. Therefore, the Temple has requested a companion GMPA, which would create a new subdistrict in the GGAMP and authorize the Temple to utilize the entirety of the property assemblage for church (religious facility), childcare and social and religious organization uses. The proposal also increases the maximum number of children for the childcare facility to 200. All development will occur consistent with the standards in the CFPUD, which closely mirror those in the Estates zoning district. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The Temple has owned the property for more than 30 years, and the Temple and childcare facilities have proven to be good neighbors. The existing campus has many improvements in place to support the proposed expanded services. An additional septic system will be installed to serve the building on Tract 64. The CFPUD contains development standards and a master plan, which depict the proposed building locations, parking areas and buffers. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. All property is under the unified control of the applicant. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) January 17, 2020 W GradyMinor Page 3 of 9 JFGNA-18 Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Fl, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.grad,minor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) (PL20180003710) Evaluation Criteria The CFPUD is consistent with the proposed subdistrict of the GGAMP. The project provides native vegetation preservation consistent with Policy 6.1.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan. The total required preserve shall be fifteen percent of existing native vegetation within tract 64 in addition to the existing 0.34 acres of preserve from SDP 90-128. FLUE Policy 5.6 requires development to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed expansion for the Temple is compatible with nearby residential dwellings. The proposed development standards and buffers will insure compatibility. The conceptual plan identifies the native preservation area located along the property's western boundary, which will provide a large natural buffer to the existing single- family residence. The building height has been limited to a zoned height of 30 feet consistent with the Estates Zoning District. The property owner has also committed to a minimum 100- foot building setback from the western property boundary. Parking and service areas have been located primarily near Pine Ridge Road and/or adjacent to the existing Temple Shalom parking area. Further, the PUD prohibits any amplified music after 8:00 pm. FLUE Policy 7.1 requires projects to connect to collector or arterial roadways. The proposed CFPUD provides for connection to Pine Ridge Road, which is an arterial road. FLUE Policy 7.3 encourages projects to interconnect with adjacent neighborhoods. Given the non-residential use and adjacency to low density single-family homes, it is not logical or compatible to interconnect. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed building addition and increase in the number of pre-school students will remain compatible. The Master Plan identifies the proposed site improvements and buffers which will insure compatibility. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. January 17, 2020 W GradyMinor Page 4 of 9 JFGNA-18 Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Fl, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.grad,minor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) (PI-20180003710) Evaluation Criteria A minimum of 15% of the existing native vegetation will be retained on Tract 64 in addition to the existing 0.34 acres of preserve within Tracts 65 and 68 from SDP-90-128 and SDP-90- 128(E). The site will have a minimum of 30% open space as required by the LDC. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. There are no known or anticipated deficiencies with regard to public or private infrastructure. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. All property owned by the applicant is included in the CFPUD, and the property will accommodate the proposed building addition without impacting the surrounding areas. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Five deviations from the LDC have been requested in regards to parking standards, preserve standards and fencing. 10.02.08 - Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas F. Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08 E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The CFPUD is consistent with the proposed subdistrict of the GGAMP. The project provides native vegetation preservation consistent with Policy 6.1.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan. Fifteen percent of existing native January 17, 2020 W GradyMinor Page 5 of 9 JFGNA-18 Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Fl, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.grad,minor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) (PL20180003710) Evaluation Criteria vegetation within Tract 64 in addition to the existing 0.34 acres of preserve within Tract 65 and 68 from SDP 90-128 will be preserved consistent with this Policy. FLUE Policy 5.6 requires development to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed expansion for the Temple is compatible with nearby residential dwellings. The proposed development standards and buffers will insure compatibility. FLUE Policy 7.1 requires projects to connect to collector or arterial roadways. The proposed PUD provides for connection to Pine Ridge Road, which is an arterial road. FLUE Policy 7.3 encourages projects to interconnect with adjacent neighborhoods. Given the non-residential use and adjacency to low density single-family homes, it is not logical or compatible to interconnect. 2. The existing land use pattern. The Temple has owned the property for over 30 years, and the use of the site for expanded community services is a logical and economical use of the site. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed building addition is a logical and economical expansion of the general use put to the Temple's property for over two decades. Accordingly, rezoning the property to a CFPUD will not create an isolated district. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The boundaries are not illogically drawn and comprise all of the property under the unified control of the applicant. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The property is currently zoned Estates, which permits the proposed community facility uses as conditional uses; however, the GGAMP no longer permits conditional uses in this location. A companion GMPA has been filed which will authorize the proposed uses. January 17, 2020 M GradyMinor Page 6 of 9 JFGNA-18 Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) (PL20180003710) Evaluation Criteria 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The CFPUD document includes development standards to insure that it is compatible with the immediately surrounding properties. The CFPUD master plan identifies appropriate buffers and open spaces, which will further insure that the development of the community facility land uses will have no adverse impacts to the neighborhood. Access to the project will be from Pine Ridge Road at two proposed locations shown on the Master Plan. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. A traffic impact analysis has been submitted in support of the proposed rezone. No level of service issues have been identified. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The project will be required to obtain an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) through the South Florida Water Management District. The ERP review evaluates historic surface water flows and controls the off -site discharge of stormwater from the site. The project will have internal water management facilities including detention areas to control the drainage for the project. No drainage issues will result from this project. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Given the limitation on building heights, setbacks and buffering, there will be no reduction in light or air for adjacent properties. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The CFPUD rezone proposes to establish community facility land uses. The uses are controlled by development standards in the CFPUD document, which provide setbacks from adjacent properties. Development subject to the CFPUD standards will not adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. January 17, 2020 W GradyMinor Page 7 of 9 JFGNA-18 Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Fl, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.grad,minor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) (PL20180003710) Evaluation Criteria All immediately adjacent properties to the south, west and east are developed, and the addition of community facility land uses should not be a deterrent to improvement or redevelopment of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The CFPUD rezone is a companion to a Growth Management Plan Amendment application. This process does not grant a special privilege to a property owner and the process is consistent with Chapter 163, F.S., for amendments to growth management plans. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The existing zoning is Estates which permits community facility land uses as a conditional use. The amendment is necessary to establish community facility land use within the CFPUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed rezone is in scale with the needs of the neighborhood and Collier County, especially in light of the demands of the increasing population of those of the Jewish faith in Collier County. The square footage of community facility uses, as well as the type of uses has been established in the CFPUD. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find other sites in the county for community facility uses; however, this site has existing infrastructure to serve the project. Moreover, this site is ideal to complement the Temple and its related community facility uses. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The subject property is partially developed with a church, preschool and internal infrastructure. The vacant tract proposed for development of community and religious (non - sanctuary) facilities (Tract 64) can be accommodated with typical site alteration. January 17, 2020 W GradyMinor Page 8 of 9 JFGNA-18 Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Fl, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.grad,minor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) (PL20180003710) Evaluation Criteria 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. There are adequate roadways and utilities available at the site. There are no public facilities deficiencies at the present time, and none will occur as a result of this project. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The project is consistent with the proposed new Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict of the GGAMP, and it is compatible with surrounding development. January 17, 2020 M GradyMinor Page 9 of 9 JFGNA-18 Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com ,..*�er C�o u �n! COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliersov.net (239) 252-2400 Assigned Planner: Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: Conditional Use (CU) Date and Time: Tuesday 2/5/2019-10 : 00 AM, GMPA 9 : OOAM Gil Martinez Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: Temple Shalom (CU) PL#: 20180003710 PropertylD#: 37926120008 Current Zoning: Estates 4630 Pine Ridge Rc d Naples FL 34116 Project Address: Lity: State: Zip: Applicant: Sharon Upenhour Agent Name: D . Wayne Arnold, AICP Phone: 239-947-1144 Q.Grad Minor & Assoc.. Bonita Sprin s FL 34134 Agent/Firm Address: y iity: Stat . Zip: Property Owner: Temple Shalom Inc Please provide the following, if applicable: Total Acreage: 13.52 Proposed # of Residential Units: Proposed Commercial Square Footage: For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 12/03/2018 Page 1 1 of 5 GAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collieraov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.collieraov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. 4 dJ I.vi L O PS . Q a. G M P A tvoT'- 6 W -& ,¢6Aa.-b►w ftwacric.,uht ysr- J.,$ Flow+ s T. P4 � RL Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. 7,14 Updated 12/03/2018 Page I k of 5 C(*r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliersov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliereov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. WE r ■ � 0AfjKAALIii r � r� r lei 3:�'IZI].r■ ii■J Air u t.. jAVl Ilillu gill• ► f t ►.f ii � A G � t►. a Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Pub SQ.a AwwoAl rAstwsooNTp1oN ANd 0— I�uia �tvNl\OwLw(� �Jtii<e� ZA Updated 12/03/2018 Page I -'of 5 Collier County Transportation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Transportation Planning " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. * PUD Monitoring `•`One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous "Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development." Co*r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes i� Z Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer. Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. 3A Updated 12/03/2018 Page I Vof 5 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes 4 �rJ�IQ��nnF �A� -- 1Ep.rovjdc r o� t i�� JCC L� �d o� 'e- Ev t prk0rJS Foy '11R0N,&J e-J & � A^Jd 814AR - Dress rn1{1j�,ck th CC Mo GaAi� Ch.I Prt-SU-UE CvcOtIor'.) Imo_ POD In AC dE tum u jE. Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): u ta-cN av Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. 34 Updated 12/03/2018 Page I Xof 5 Environmental Checklist Conditional Use nn Project Name TE e S-H4 J0M CIF i�aY f ES 01. Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the �J subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents #24). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 O3 Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.A.2). Preserve Label- P546 04. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.13-1); 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H. Ld-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 05. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve Width - P603 Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550 7. J Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback — New 08. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) Listed Species - P522 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required — P 522 1 Q. Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P626 Additional Comments: species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Note: Not required at time of Land use petitions except for Bald Eagle Management Plans. Staff requests management plans for other species are only provided at time of Plat or SDP. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. 1 I. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide descriptions of each FLUCFCS code Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Demonstrate on map. (G Provide a companion chart. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 13. Where off -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcel(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 14. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 15. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 16. Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise in sea level. 17. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. 18. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. l�. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Indicate that the petition is in compliance with 3.06.00 and does not propose any prohibited uses per LDC 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 20. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 21. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. 22. For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the project is consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements of the Manatee Protection Plan not included in 5.05.02. 23. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. 24. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) ® Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. Ob. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. Oc. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. G Indicate wetland sto be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. NO W014 CRn1 dS (e) Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 25. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 26. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? Ta �jQ I'�{'rw�'�,E A+ Fi � S+ 17E il�EvJ 27 PUD master plan or PPL/SDP site plan notes (note requirements subject to change during review process) Type B or C Landscape Buffer (provide as Buffer commitment): Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. In order to provide the required (insert Type B or C) buffer, a minimum 6-foot-wide landscape buffer easement located outside of the preserve will be conveyed by owner to a homeowner's association or condominium association at time of SDP or plat approval. Owner will plant additional landscape material in the buffer easement to achieve the opacity requirement no later than one year from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy. Environmental Data Checklist Project Name T_' m p i l; S k A Lc m or Ni-416 The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 f l.) Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. (�3) Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. 4. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. 5. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. Provide when treated stormwater is being directed into preserves (45 above). 7. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered aProvide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed Co*.-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20180003710 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ David AnthonyEnvironmental Review 252-2497 david.anthony@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Summer Ara ue Environmental Review 252-6290 sum mer.brownara ue@colliercountyfl. ov ❑ Claudine Auclair GMD Operations and Regulatory Management 252-5887 claudine.auclair@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov Q� Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@ col IiercountyfLgov ❑ Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov C� Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov C� Thomas Clarke Operations Coordinator 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov le Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Division 252-4312 timothy.finn @colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paula.fleishman@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James French Growth Management Deputy Department Head 252-5717 james.french@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael. ibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zo-ning Division 252-2484 nancv.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Shar Hin son Greater Naples Fire District 774-2800 shingson@gnfire.or ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodi.hughes@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Erin Jose hitis Environmental Specialist, Senior 252-2915 erin.josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marcia.kendall@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov Gil Martinez Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gilbert.martinez@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 'ack.mckenna@colliercount fl. ov ❑ Matt McLean. P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Plannin 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 12/03/2018 Page 1 4 of 5 C0 er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierL,ov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 - i ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Stefanie Nawrocki Development Review - Zoning 252-2313 stefanie.nawrocki@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandy.otero@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 bra ndi.pollard @colliercountyfLgov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Daniel Roman. P.E. Engineering Utilities 252-2538 daniel.roman@colliercountyfl.gov Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2708 james.sabo@colliergo.net L� Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@col liercount fl. ov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Development Review -Zoning 252-2460 chris.scott@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Camden Smith Zoning Division Operations 252-1042 camden.smith@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-5740 scott.stone@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 mark.strain@colliercountyfl.gov f< Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercount fl. ov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov k David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 david.weeks@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willou.ghbv Development Review - Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughbyj@�colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email f47 J 367 &879 �3 aAe,Se(Ci ��%Z� ��•C'i 2GllLIGI41.LQ.LIM, aIr6W 111 90t 6l►wKNA UqA Q 6t-MA11-•4A0 rrta� i� ' tN 1 l t) fft"f ut Coin h'jqt' 6 C, xi riuy,.eA 'V--T �k6e i YA Updated 12/03/2018 Page 1.,9'of 5 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Stefanie Nawrocki Development Review - Zoning 252-2313 stefanie.nawrocki@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandy.otero@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brand i.pollard@colliercountyfl. ov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Daniel Roman, P.E. Engineering Utilities 252-2538 daniel.roman @colliercount fl. ov ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2708 'ames.sabo@colliergo.net ❑ Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@col liercountyfl. ov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Development Review - Zoning 252-2460 chris.scott@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Camden Smith Zoning Operations Manager 252-1042 camden.smith@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-5740 scott.stone@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 mark.strain@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 david.weeks@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email a n\ z I - LO jkAEe ` r -Ll e a -a Updated 12/03/2018 Page IXof 5 Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL20180003710 — Tem le Shalom CU PRE -APR INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke Camden Smith,(Ops Staff) STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Sharon Umpenhour / 239-947-1144 / sumpenhour@gradyminor.com • Agent to list for PL# D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. "Please copy Sharon Umpenhour (sumpenhour@gradyminor.com) on all emails pertaining to this project. ■ Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) Parcel No. 37926120008, Temple Shalom, Inc. ■ Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) Proposed small-scale GMP amendment and conditional use ■ Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): Proposed increase in the allowable square footage by approximately 15-20,000 s.f. • Details about Project (choose type that applies): Conditional Use(CU) — is this a phased development and if so what schedule is being proposed? NO Is the proposal for a specific Tract or addition of a Tract/Use? NO Supplemental Information provided by: Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician sumpenhour@gradyminor.com 239-947-1144 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zoning Division • 28M North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252-2400 • www..cdNergov.net PR L) z0' Co er County )w9 b, G a i I vlu J COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FL www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountvfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary El 19 ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 Affidavit of Authorizationsigned and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 El Warranty Deed(s) 1 29 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ �] Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Traffic Impact Study 1 ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 LJ 1 91 Electronic copy of all required documents 1 Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ Checklist continues on next page February 1, 2019 Page 9 of 11 GAY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierL,ov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if the PUD ❑ 11Amending IN Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1El 12 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: �.. Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D. Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑School District (Residential Components): Amy ElConservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Lockheart ® Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams & David Berra ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director n Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre J4 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 40 Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: 0 Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. Q Minor Study Review: $750.00 Q Major Study Review $1,500.00 February 1, 2019 Page 10 of 11 GAY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 51 and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party Date February 1, 2019 Page 11 of 11 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA www.collieraov.net (239) 252-2400 FA n (2eLLCIAT i0 C'%'Lr—J�LteT Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checl%llbL lur: ❑ A Conditional Use to be heard by the Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals ❑ A Minor Conditional Use to be heard by the Office of the Hearing Examiner Chapter 3 C.1. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. Requirements for Review Copies Required Required Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 ® ❑ Cover letter briefly explaining the project 1 Pre -Application Notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 ® ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ® ❑ Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 ® ❑ Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ Boundary Survey 1 Conceptual Site Plan 24" X 36" plus (one 8 % X 11 copy) ❑ Plans showing proposed location for utilities, if required ❑ Plans for screening and buffering the use with reference as to type, dimensions, and character, if required ❑ ❑ ❑ Plans showing the proposed landscaping and provisions for trees protected by County regulations, if required ❑ ❑ Plans showing the proposed signs and lighting, including type, dimensions, and if required ❑ ❑ Elcharacter, Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structure(s), if applicable 1 X' ❑ Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 El Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments & sketches) 1 Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearing. ❑ Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Traffic Impact Study (TIS) or waiver 1 Historical and Archeological Survey, or waiver 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans * Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 [ ❑ * If located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 5/08/2018 Page 8 of 12 C;Ar County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following additional reviewers: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or Executive Director EMS: Artie Bay Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson n GMD Graphics ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams Other: Communication Towers: ❑ Mosquito Control ❑ Naples Airport Authority Commercial Mining: ❑ I Impact Fees ❑ I Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey LJ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart 5/08/2018 Page 9 of 12 GO! br County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 FEE REQUIREMENTS All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners ❑ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 (to be credited towards the application fee if the application is filed within 9 months of pre -application meeting) conditional Use Application Fee: $4,000.00 o When filed with Rezone Petition: $1,500.00 o Additional fee for 51h and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee 10'Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $300.00 f� Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): VIA $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species survey review fee (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Fee, if required: Methodology Review Fee: $500.00 eoujmr rwrd-& VCR o Minor Study Review Fee: $750.00 o Major Study Review Fee: $1,500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Hearing Examiner or CCPC: $1,125.00 XEstimated Legal Advertising Fee for the BZA, if required: $500.00 Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Date Agent/Owner Name (please print) 5/08/2018 Page 10 of 12 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20180003708and FL20180003710 I Daryl Sissman (print name), as President (title, If applicable) of Temple shalom, Inc. (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant =contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 55. We/1 authorizeQ Grady Minor& Associates, P.A. and Coleman. Yovanomch & Koester, P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. " • if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • if the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • if the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • in each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 2Ca Date The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on 0E S QQ gate) by Daryl Sissman (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as President oi7empleShalom, Inc. who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification) as identification.— �j� Qj4 SIO.fl L- PROS :� NaJ STAMPISEAL Signature o1rNotiry Publi CPW&COA-00I 151155 REV 3124/14 ^�a* ors-., NANCY i. DiLLAPD Notary Public - State of Florida ; a Commisslon � GG 357241 -' �'crn.°� My Comm. Expires Aug 10, 2023 6c,ced through National Notarf Assn. 2020 FLORIDA NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION AMENDED ANNUAL FILED REPORT Jun 08, 2020 DOCUMENT# 711527 Secretary of State Entity Name: TEMPLE SHALOM, INC. 7070702203CC Current Principal Place of Business: 4630 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119-4063 Current Mailing Address: 4630 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119-4063 US FEI Number: 59-2546855 Certificate of Status Desired: Yes Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: DEBORAH, FIDEL 4630 PINE RIDGE RD. NAPLES, FL 34119 US The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida SIGNATURE: DEBORAH FIDEL 06/08/2020 Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date Officer/Director Detail : Title FINANCIAL SECT'Y Title TREASURER Name PING, STEPHEN Name RITTER, SUSAN Address 3410 CREEKVIEW DRIVE Address 27241 IBIS COVE COURT City -State -Zip: BONITA SPRINGS FL 34134 City -State -Zip: BONITA SPRINGS FL 34134 Title 1ST VP Title PRESIDENT Name KAUFMAN,EDWARD Name ANTZIS,DEBRA Address 801 SPYGLASS LANE Address 6785 SOUTHERN OAK COURT City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34102 City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34109 Title PRESIDENT Title EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Name SISSMAN, DARYL Name FIDEL, DEBORAH Address 575 WHISPERING PINE LANE Address 554 AVELLINO ISLES CIR 13101 City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34103 City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34119 Title 2ND V PRESIDENT Title 3RD VP Name HASSENFELD, MERRILL Name MINTZ, ROBIN Address 5550 HERON POINT DRIVE Address 5938 HAMMOCK ISLES CIRCLE #601 City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34108 City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34119 I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that I am an officer or director of the corporation or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 617, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered. SIGNATURE: DEBORAH FIDEL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 06/08/2020 Electronic Signature of Signing Officer/Director Detail Date Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Not applicable f C. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address Temple Shalom, Inc. A Florida Not For Profit Corporation If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, percentage of interest: Name and Address Not applicable % of Owners 100 list the beneficiaries of the trust with the % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Co*:r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collie[gov.net 9 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: _ Name and Address % of Ownership Not applicable e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Not applicable Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease Not applicable 12/12/1990 years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Cover County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collier ov.net Date of option: Not applicable 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date option terminates: Not applicable or Anticipated closing date: Not applicable AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ,�--- Naples, Fl. 34104 Agent/Owner Signature C e, Agent/Owner Name (please print) Date Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 2019 FLORIDA NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT FILED DOCUMENT# 711527 Mar 15, 2019 Entity Name: TEMPLE SHALOM, INC. Secretary of State Current Principal Place of Business: 4766904785CC 4630 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 341194063 Current Mailing Address: 4630 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119-4063 US FEI Number: 59-2546855 Certificate of Status Desired: No Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: GOULD, MAXINE 4630 PINE RIDGE RD. NAPLES, FL 34119 US The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida. SIGNATURE: MAXINE GOULD 03/15/2019 Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date Officer/Director Detail : Title FINANCIAL SECT'Y Name SILBERG, DAVID Address 4044 TRINIDAD WAY City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34119 Title 3 RD VP Name KAUFMAN,EDWARD Address 801 SPYGLASS LANE City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34102 Title 1ST V PRESIDENT Name SISSMAN, DARYL Address 575 WHISPERING PINE LANE City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34103 Title 2ND V PRESIDENT Name HASSENFELD, MERRILL Address 5550 HERON POINT DRIVE #601 City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34108 Title TREASURER Name LICKHALTER, HARRIET Address 575 VIA VENETO 202 City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34108 Title PRESIDENT Name ANTZIS, DEBRA Address 6785 SOUTHERN OAK COURT City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34109 Title EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Name FIDEL, DEBORAH Address 554 AVELLINO ISLES CIR 13101 City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34119 I hereby certify that the information Indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that 1 am an officer or director ofthe corporation or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 617, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered. SIGNATURE: DEBORAH FIDEL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 03/15/2019 Electronic Signature of Signing Officer/Director Detail Date r CZer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as, Property I.D. Number 37926120008 4630 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34119-4063 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Community Facility planned unit development (CFPUD) zoning. We hereby designate Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. and Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code.. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Daryl ss an as President of Temple Shalom, Inc. Owner STATE OF COUNTY OF �mI_l.lf Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this �r day of2020 by Daryl Sissman as President of Temple Shalom, Inc. who is personal) } me or has produced as identificatior PIJ_csl0 at PAESeFKDO �ff_ NotaryP r pa FANCY i, pID82023. (Name typed, printed r stamped) ,>A e N `� Y I Lt✓ I } � ,� ��= Notary Public •St n Commission k February 1, 2019 OFf` My Comm. Expires Page 8 of 11 Bonded through Nation OW14M m t=m PLAftC0 FORM a tw w 4m"nt set rMrw�a!'ssq++ w..�+t am Holly A. Harmm LIEBERFARB, TREiSER, et al. era- $01 12th Avenue South Naples, Florida 33940 nr total id mmitow k Holly A. Harmon 001578 OR BOOK EXHIBIT.'A' 001080 PAGE serer 501 12th Avenue South Naples, Florida 33940 sao lettmt in UN to tt mm" talc s+ 1 �1t nls tar Ira tl 111h W-'CWK &Mr rmuted nits fly`- day of December . A. D_ t940 . by LAND PROCUREMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited partnership I'm party. Ia M TEMPLE SHALOM, INC., a Florida rat -for -profit corporation in Zi mhosepassafJolt'wdd —is 157S Pine Ridge Road, Naples, Florida 33990 = In itt c semard parer: N c' t*l..enr -sa be. d. area. •r • oar •'ester siars3n d 'ti•eu. sad r�•t. kin. 1np1 rfr.arr de rmsat UJ a a�n'a.•„ � Tha! J' an n -IS 10.00 (TEN DDJ in hand paid by the sal- a serelpt a•hmrof is here r a does hereby remnise, se- lease and guilAw-Int party forwvr. all the right. lif r ! rim and demand nditrh the said Jirs1 Party in the f ol6wi a dmvibed lot, plere or parer ad. sr Iv. lying and heBeL In the Cement' of Collier State of Florida , to- -1: Tract 64, les and c 45 feet of the North 7S t the f; Tract 6% s the stet t t Tract 68, s the oft herby W co tri all In Unit 6. EN CATE E5 aocorda a with and subj to the plat recorded i Plai 16 f r Co nty, Florida. By exec ut of "s uit m t r f er does lease any and all of the Vert ri hts in the t cl a rea ed a retained in that aert n We nt t 4 1 g0 nd 17. .990 in Official Records o t li ds of 11' lorida; which reverter t the t ha i t agrim con- struction I structure within (S) y of the to of the subject property rt to the undersigned. The utin Cenral Pa he party of the first part ha rig authority pursuant to of the governing part tb`�c ute this Quit Claim Deed. T/ iba wd to ­f[Chll :- afar the apIpartMOnlvs WMA1llo �eltahlJttir'. ng beloing or in anywiseappelalmin9. interest. lien. equity and claim toh/tt- sostrr of the said first parry, either in rota or t•qu a an y proper use. benefit and Woof of Ihs raid second party f 16 r The said first party has sig rd and sealed these presents the day and year first a" tarimm Signed, a,.d 'aired in ptetottu a;: LAND PROCUREMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP — a Flon limited nership ... _.._....... ___ y: _race herman Cenral Partner STATE OF FIARIDA, Cou%TY of Collier s t= -.. I HEREBY CERTIFY that•" on;dens 1isJ;"Leforc me, an oftit,, duly aathorirrd in tit State atatmid and in the L'saary aforesaid to take scksrwlcdamtnu, prr.onallr appnred BRUCE S. SHERMAN, General Partner of LAND PROCUREMENT LIMITED P►1RTHERSHII a Florida liaaaeu partt1P� hi ' to me kown to be the itetsen aefcsr in and Ave cmerund the faergAv mnumment and he ; t ai�knoe.�_ cl Won: me that he eaaated the ware. - V1iTNTm my hand and Wariat seat in the C it and stair test siffe id site f0 Z of December A. D. to 90_ _&�i �r•�— ss •NW:`PAtr 5rtin C7 P_CW2A Colfler county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD-Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change - Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) 0 PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) S15, T49, R26 (see attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 37926120008 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 4630 Pine Ridge Road LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way e SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Temple Shalom PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Temple Shalom PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (forexisting projects/sites only) SDP 90-128 or AR or PL # 2001-AR-0491 Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 Coflie-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: ❑• Email Applicant Name: Sharon Umpenhour ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Phone: 239-947-1144 Email/Fax: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 37926120008 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: 04/30/2019 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 Y+ll, s • ail'` '►. �r� • _ _ SUBJECT• ye PROPERTY • Pine Ridge RD yi `o r Or tj AL `'l ... 1r NMcoDD�oo-�o Oo o-opC1P -oe .smWho } 000ffditCRUwOo dfj t Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 4630 PINE Site Zone Parcel No 37926120008 Address RIDGE RD Site City NAPLES *Note 34116 Name / Address TEMPLE SHALOM INC 4630 PINE RIDGE RD City NAPLES State I FL I Zip 34119-4063 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4B15 334300 64 04B15 15 49 26 13.52 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 26 TR 64, 65 & 68,LESS S 45FT OF N 75FT OF TR 64, LESS N 75FT OF TR 65 OR 1529 PG 1519 OR 1578 PG1080 Milla a Area 9 100 Milla a Rates* *Calculations Sub./Condo 334300 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 26 School Other Total Use Code 9 71 - CHURCHES 5.049 6.5084 11.5574 Latest Sales History 2018 Certified Tax Roll Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book -Page Amount 12/12/90 1578-1080 $ 0 05/01/90 1529-1519 $ 0 03/01/89 1 1425-1149 1 $ 71,300 06/01/87 1 1272-612 1 $ 38,000 Land Value $ 893,672 (+) Improved Value $ 5,175,908 (_) Market Value $ 6,069,580 (_) Assessed Value $ 6,069,580 - S h IT bl V I $0 (-) c oo axa e a ue (_) Taxable Value $ 0 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll I� 1 I 1 4 n s 10 r p-11 N 69•-SCD-4 2�79� X J L M U - toe fu C n_ e I 3 � J X t� GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT No zs A SUBDIVISION OF PARTS OF SECTIONS 9, 10.15 & 16, T-49-S,R-26-E. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. <90L G f N' ' �ATF-. E -5 T.4T� s L/A/ / 7-Iv 0. t RESOLUTION NO. 2000-12 RENAME STREET , RECORDED 1/21/2000 ,OR2633 PG 1683-1684 PLAT BOOK 7 PAGE 15117&19 SHEET 1 OF 2 3 3 O• i1 u n p .� - - N / 1 • r! r+ .• a // 6 6 p' -- 0 i I _ n4Z a = 4Q = 07' � Tc 7`1 rt: Td 79 d / 94 9!S "lose 19 - -19 11a _____E BLVD. _ _-- ------ -- --- -- .� --- — — -- — — — —`O' -41 68 69 72 T3 714 TT Sd BZ T3 'fF+6 t0T // /! 113 = IjZ�O soa 53 �S`T + .` '� _S l�iZIs fi`3 +92 47 �rt3(e - - - *vs — — — — — -r- t�="~ — 11 TH. A E_ S.W. — — — — — of ry u it // of ���ri ' �f2. 43 •� .� �`4!� � 4q � SO= a4 91 96 ' 103 !I 11 N 1 IIN A O. If // ..a'" ,N // II /1 ' s Z a 40 V 39 '' 38 37 36 3-S 34 - 3 37- t ; A5's h0 43 s 1 1 8 s 13TH_ALE . S.W. _ — — — — _ _ a — S_89-_40_ 50—r.--- 11 = 119 - Z'1 x at = as 24 - 25 Z 7 IClO = 101 _ I 1f Y rI /f 1! !/ of /1 /f r/ it 11 /1 - 121 `20 s 19 ' $a ' 17 ' 1 -1$ + t♦ = f3 : 32 + t1 a IST a 38 = 101 - 1bZ= " -- —r 15TH A S.W. AD r — - 11 1 d 1 - 2 3 • 4. + s = I: • ?� • . 8 = 9 ' 10' --sea c 1 _Z7 "or. - 123 • 0 -0 -4c S0"W. 5Z80-0------- — — -- ---- — --- -- GREEN BLVD- IF O F 16 13 s! 3 510-- 21 22 GFE.R1-wCE. MOh/UNAF_ M "r- PLAT BOOK 7 PAGE 15 ��.. "NCO FORM m FAWN Y: todrw 71. MM�rM'fI�M w.rpl r Holly A. Harman 00 1 5 7 8 010 1 0 8 0 LIEBERFARB, TREISER, et al. _ 801 tnh Avenue South OR BOOK PAGE Naples, Florida 33940 nr hermod lhwm A K- Holly A. Harmon cC ...�: 801 12th Avenue South 5, Naples, Florida 33940 - ---- - -_�\ .. .•-`-�> av aompn�au[ w� nlecrsamc ran sr�a rw4 tms ut rut n INS Ida-1� DCOL Ea-ea,ated Ail /I doF.f December . A. D_ 19go • by LAND PROCUREMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited partnership first p.ets.1. t r TE41PLE SHALOM, INC., a Florida not -for -profit Corporation a•Aose paslof(fee adders: u 1575 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, Florida 33940 T � a u_ setn.d ptvty: EEtta�... m,a a,,,a .>r Fey„e,as' '.a�.s 'aaa,i. � a, •.._,.. ,va ,r:,n, x,,,, kw o Th t lAi+$1 i�u[ -f �T" "xwmadrtt i1,"3•uof S 10. DO (TEN DOLLAR ) o m Aa.d paid by to .1. r "fh� metpt o heeeal : hrrc"Aa•.. p u" 9 . d«-: he..6r +rmue..e- L-- old q f r(ot n wti =rserond vnr13• 1—l",. otl the eight- f iG nle.� 6 d dr oa.td o.hieh the said list early hrs rl,,la°1ha• IoIA>,.frtg de�t,sh«i 101. pica: oe Iw `1o..d ie. tying and hero, I. the C—sty of i Collier"` Stateel Florida t I: Tract 64, less' and e*CepVt1 a"3D'oth, 45 feet of the North 75 f thei^eof; Tract 65, le i the ¢forth ,S 11 {ge1 ihetftf "'""` Tract 68, less the,jJorth fe :lhereo[,, all in Unit �6, Cat -DEN GATE EStATTS ,," itt accordance with and�;subjeGt to the plat $goit P�Yges,,9' "htt 16-' � r Co nt Florida. recorded i Plat bfi 'Ids 2ff 3:;Gfle Y. By execut of Jhms Quit Im -' t rl iof e` tr 'rt 1 does Ielease any and m all of the ert nhts msihe ub treeit : wtjic ver�tcreaed and retained in that certa n War ntyk Deedk ate¢) M'lajy 4„ 1 90(nd rec gn A1a +•,17, 1990 in Official Records 13 5it P �'j. 7 of" th0 Ppbtio R Ords of Collier Cot ri ys Florida; which o reverter pfnvtd }i t=•itr`�the a"verit=•YYiat a�e-5halomilr" .;nfafled tg dommence Con- struction of Mel Gus structure within {5) ye3�rg of the to of'sa .deed, the subject property I ert to the undersigned. TheirkPcutfn •, General Paf°'the party of the first part has4tpe ngh`t pprr@rtttd authority puusl8nt to :'ike' rtrF of the governing partnersjti eampm •" tG' xqacute this Quit Claim Deed. " ,>m i n�..� may, a,. ,R�, • '° � ' 1� >npe lYs. r ��psanrrurtenanres th-1. beL..gire Q f. >K appe.tat^+ g cite 1 lit, ,wa3e" lerest. Se., egatlr and Clair .ohd- soeter o1 the said list poets. either:. laa, or"igti<fy rfv�rAP"' �)y fooa=. a:e. benefit and &hoof al the Sid Zscrotal early laeee- s The ,aid liml party has sig.t•d end sealed these pee eels the day a.d yeto list a6— —ilt—. Sig.ed, -ee.ed i. t--peace of: LAND PROCUREMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHI a Flonli limited partnership By: race S. Shermn - General Partner ------------------------ STATE OF FLORIDA, \ COUTY OF Collier I HEREBY CERTIFY thai od` tli-is `dij;'4foiesne, an offi— duly •` a zed i ..c Sue af.—id aed in the Co-oaty a. vid take ackno.leLSm per wally-: appeued BRUCE S.SHERMAN, General Partner of LAND PROCUREMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHI , a Fbritia limtanta partnership _ and •atkno.:i,d a to me kno.n to be the l,er dexzibM m and xho ucavtcd the foz gem, instrumcns he �- _ gc before me that he e¢cated the vn - - WIT\ESS my hand and official seal m the Count. and State Lit afo .idd this December A. D. 19 90 4,;W-d..__N_:...-�7-.�=Y.I.f:...:...._..._......_-_ F Moilow - - _ - - - ZONE AH - - - (ELEV. 12.0' N4VD88) FZ _� I ZONE X 500 Fz FZ / � / \'`? �- F2 \ �Eti /FZ _Fz 1�FZ 1�FZFZFZ F- -Z FZ FZ FZ F7-F7 -FZ -_FL"FZ `FZ / 2�FZ FZ FZ FZ FZ �FZ FZ FZ FZ� APPROXIMATE PINE RIDGE ROAD (SR 896) FLOOD ZONE LINE j ^ PER STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA776N --------------------------------- L-----_ ---__ -----------------------RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP SECTION 03504-2603, RECORDED IN ROAD------------------- - -------ZONE X- -- ------------------------------------ BOOK 2, PAGES 98 THROUGH 101, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER ti ZONE X COUNTY, FLORIDA g S 89 °31 '27" W 330.00' ZONE x 330.00' (P) N 002853" W 330.00' (P) 330.00' (P) S O 02853 " E o SEE NOTE 15 30.00' o 30 00' ^- 0 O o-------- - - - - - - - - rI - - - - - - - - - - _ ------- - ------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- asPHUTDN89°31'27"E 330.00' EDGE OF PAVEMENT I --- � 1 _ _ _ _ _ I � - - - - - - - - TO - - - - - - _ _ o � ` _ FZ _ FZ T FZ _Fz Fz - QRIVE ' FZ = TT I FZ FZ FZ - F FZ � FZ -FZ FZ f-Z FZ FZT __7Z FZ - IFZ FZ - FZ - FZ FZ - - FZ -WV I - - - O �� F ca - FZ E A F FZ - - FZ FZ FZ FZ FZ FZ FZ FZ FZ ^ T Fz / 'FL / FZ �(iB E2 ZONE AH I / �Ri /RaP ® 0 5GRR 2406 i N 89 °31 '27" E 990.00' FZ ®wv (ELEV 120' NAUD88> WV I � Fz TO FIR 1 FZ 1.5W -LEGIBLE Fz ^ I L ®� FZ Fz - Fz - - - - - - - - R T TOB - TOB - - - - - - - - - - - G p TOB Fz Fz �\ \\ ILLEGIBLE Fz o N I I I Fz ZONE X 500 I LT\�z � TOB �- Fz-- I� `- � at: C14 �w � � / I I I \I f� \ FZ � Fz " �ti Eti ZONE X z i F2 _ FZ �r F'Z \ I / FZ / \ Fti > ENTRY ) � I� N FZ ti W �- FZ fT 1 \ I �Z - FZ FZ FZ FZ FZ - -� FZ � � I 4 I I I W o 0 0 \ n I SIGN JO.0" 30.0' / 1 r Wo a / / 1 14 T 1 / I o ZONE X I I I 60.0' ROADWAY EASEMENT 4 h Q- I " ASPHALT DRIVE \ENT ' 1 I I N I (OR 244, PG 948 / I h FPL EASEM N 1 I EXCEPTION 3 (� o fZ �? I I I N LO/ --1�` I Fz J � `- Fz I 4 I� 10 GRASS OR 1648, PG 1199) � 4 I W L �. I o Fti T o / \ I I 9 GRASS 10 GRASS ( I I 6X8' II J / I PARKING SPACES PARKING SPACES EXCEPTION 7 N � Fti '2 ✓ I \ I �I' PARKING SPACES 1 1 1 PUMP HOUSE N N Fz Imo + a ® CONC. CURB ® ZONE X C3 ® IRV N I 1 84.4' 1 j I 4 FZ -� 1 ~ I I c� m )0 GRASS (TYPIG4L) 9 GRASS 10 GRASS / FZ Q FDC �® IRV 4 �ti i o PARKING SPACESLq I 1 �'+ � PARKING SPACES PARKING SPACES \/ 60.0' ROADWAY EASEMENT I I 1 a N j 1 I I I iOR 244, PG 948 1 l I U I T ( ) I ASPHALT DRIVE I I APPROXIMATE 1 � I � EXCEPTION 3 I I AND PARKING 1 z 1 � FLOOD ZONE ILINE I � . F APPROXIMATE 1 I FZ 10 GRASS 1� PAI?KIN� d� n l I N 1 \ FLOOD ZONE LINE j mI / PARKING SPACES SPA EST ® CO 'Co I I� F � 1 I O / WALL COooCO I 74.1' I I 1 I N ® ®IRV 53.2' 1 12'X24' I I 4 P KING H/C H/CPHICFtil ° WAIL DUMPSTER' 1� I N Mo i I FZ PARKING SPACES I SPICES, I N CONC ° WALL AREA CHAIN LINK FENCE N /� M W N o o I I III �' a F Fz Fz N , ET IRV 1 I 1 (MEANDERS ALONG \ I Fz c� a a c� c� a I I ASPHALT DRIVE 2 FZ ASPHALT DRIVE f �0 1�.. �� L / aao aao PROPERTY LINE) a ,� I I AND PARKING s. CHAIN LINK Fz I v d od a ZONE AH 1 4 Z I (ELEV. 12.0' MVD88) i 6.0' >z I m W WAPPROI m 9 GRASS I I Q 1 •, I ? FENCE 1 1 1 \ o o FLOOD ZONE PARKING SPACES 14 PARKIN H/C H/C 4H�CCI FLOOD ZOIVE LINE" I N � I I SP CES I �--------,I II PARKING SPACES PARKING SPACES -� M � 1W ° O 'M 1.6_ II I I L -6 ------- -4 - - - - - - - - - - ---- / i1I II I I I I III IIII I�yY � "to ------ 0ZON/- - - - -- --------- TAT 68 '2 H/G NTRA C T64 _ I ® II X i/ (IMPROVED) D) ASPHALT DRIVE W a ? a mo 5. 1' H/C rn 5.4Q . r F1 O c' C)c III to (Z�'�vW ''1 I ) I 377' ^a ok -----------t-------- --- - -- -- -* T------------- H� rt__ -------� T - 1 N _ `° H/C I / \\ I 1 lO o N O 1 0 W 3.8' co I/ I I I 1 I ' 2.1' \�1. 4' 1 STORY N 4.7' 6.0' BUILDING 4 h 4.6' I M ZONE AH Ln o f I I 1 ZONE X 500 '- % N / O FT L- 30.0' 30.0, ASPHALT DRIVE Q N FLAG - 4 s' N (ELEV 12.0' NQVD88) 100 F 2 �- POLE I� I N I II ! pp ^ �I 1 to 4 FZ II 9 GRASS 4 GRASS Fti CONC. ICCURB IN a "N HI � �PARKING SPACES PARKING SPACES Co 12.0' C3 15.4' 3 FKIN K 7X119 GRASS to 29.0'1 PARKING SPACES SPACESIRV 102.2'$ATaCL ASPHALT DRIV) ASPHALT DRIVE4. I;I I \ I I4\ I I I AND PARKING \ I I TIN ZI Fz 'r �13.7' 0.8' 4.6' C CN 13 V 6 GRA1.3' 2.1' 0.8' PARKING SPACES 5.30' 5.45.3' 18.0' 5518.0' 5.45.418.0 4. 1I\ 6" PVC 33.318 i333.4' '16.1 4.0' STUB I I N � I 17.0' I m FZ I Y Wn 9 N o I -" I 1o.s' I 1 T / I ¢ N �� s.4' I �I ZONE X ( `� I I FZ I 'I y x x x �' 23.3' 1 �H4IN LINK I GATE , z ' N / 1033' -� l � g � d: 8.6" 3.3' �r N" I FENCE Fz o S N 9.3' i8.0' N 2 �' ; \ / 33.3'i / 33.3' 33.3' / 33.3' ; 41.4' I APPROXIMATE y FZ I I �+ 17.9 / 5.4' S.4' 18. 1 5.4' S.4' 18. 1 / 5.4' 5.4' 27'7 • rn IRV I FLOOD ZONE LINE i 'T�I 7.8' X20' ASPHALT DRIVE ( CONC.' 5.3' S.4' S.3' IRV® 30 W �ti 72.7' SHED PLAY ) I CONC. CURB SEP77 . / I 4ti 1 0 W I -_ / o x c 'FZ Fz - (APICAL) GROUND LID o v z / \ Fti 1 I I oo \ \ 4^ I II FZ x F x x Fz IRV F h �t o � aFCM V0 ID 3'X3" Fz 4 I1R 3/8" 1----"'_ - - - -TDB- - - I �FZFz_- - - - - ---_- _ - _1Q�._ _�� W�------- N -- -- "_ Fz ----Pvc- NO ID I---- - --------- ------ r--- 2 ------ FZFzFz rn co FZ---------- 0.29' N -------- ----- �fr\ ---- ----------------------- N------- -Fc� ��F 8» o k r 0.81 ' N I o ZONE AH WALL W/ CHAIN o 6" � m W I T - - - RR LB 2503 (ELEV. 12.0' NQVD88) LINK FENCE STUB o moo- 0.69' W o FZ 1.03' W I \ STUB 706 J N o 0.33 S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0_4_E 0.86' W ---- =-= ---=Fz��r� =--{r -==33 �0,�:(P�_-�-- - - - --- =- -- =- - ---- - - -- - - =-------------------- ---------4------- ---�--------------------------- --- ----------- --- 330.00' (P) roa --- _ _ -- -`` - Fz �` 330.00' (P) o rr - X --- --- - RR NO ID -------------------- - -- R LB 7313- - - - - - - - - -FIR NO 0 ----------- --- FIR NO ID ----------- --- ---- FIR LB 6569--------------------------------------� T------- F-------NS 8T 3127 W 990.0 - o.s3' S 0.93' S 0.93' S --- - - - -- FIR NO ID " � � 0 0.91' E ZONE AH F N 0.91' E 0.91 ' E ZONE X FZ > BENT oo 1` 1 0.92' S 0. 75' S \ F/GG 4�1 RE FENCL'' T F / M (ELEV 12.0' NAVD88) -` o �rn t / 0.73' S ` J 0.89' & I \ Z 4ti 0.68' & ) ) `� 1.28' E Fz N _ - - - - €z - -F�- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � I 12 Fz FZ ti FZ ? _ J ^ W PAUL G AIRHURST I \ USA & OUALLEY ONEAL I I , ZONE X N `/ 2 ( 4 / HASH o 01 PA FAIRHURST CAROL B CTHOLD SARAH & GEOfFREY AI WILUG Fz 1 1 Fz JAMES PETER KINNEY 4 \ o (OR 4937, PG 3212) (OR 1587 PG 2171) (OR 5038 PG 3795) FZ g o OR 4712, PG 2020 (OR 4060, PG 5282) '2 (OR 5229, PG 602) I I (OR 3908, PG 1173) W d. '2 ( ) (VACANT) (IMPROVED) (IMPROVED) 0- (IMPROVED) I 1 (IMPROVED) ZONE X Fl Z J (IMPROVED) / (IMPROVED) L -n Fz FZ i \ 1 3 v a \ ZONE AH 14V " o N Fti F2 (ELEV. 12.0' N41AD88) I APPROXIMATE FLOOD ZONE LINE (OR 2330, PG 610) BILL OF SQL&, &XC&P7701V 8 (OR 2330, PG 614) U77LITY EASEMENT; DiCEPRON 10 (OR 2779, PG 3340) U77LITY EASEMENT, EXCEPTION 11 (OR 2799, PG 1342) U77LITY FACIL177ES WARR4WY DEED AND BILL OF SALE , EXCEP7ON 12 (OR 2843, PG 1075) U77LITY FACIL177ES SUBORDIN4770N, CONSENT AND JOINDER, EXCEPTON 13 LEGEND POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT PB PLAT BOOK ELEV ELEVATION POB POINT OF BEGINNING OR OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK INV INVERT ELEVATION FIP O FOUND IRON PIPE PG PAGE(S) RIM RIM ELEVATION FIR O FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD PSM PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER A/C AIR CONDITIONING UNIT/PAD SIR • SET 5/8" IRON ROD w/CAP, L.B. #5151 LB LICENSED BUSINESS CONC CONCRETE FCM O FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT SPC STATE PLANE COORDINATES CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE SCM ■ SET CONC. MONUMENT w/ALUMINUM DISK, ROW RIGHT-OF-WAY CPP CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE L.B. #5151 PUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE FPK 0 FOUND PARKER KALON NAIL CUE COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT CHW CONCRETE HEADWALL SPK SET PARKER KALON NAIL w/ALUMINUM UE UTILITY EASEMENT TOB TOP OF BANK DISK, LB.# 5151 AE ACCESS EASEMENT TOS TOE OF SLOPE FDH O FOUND DRILL HOLE DE DRAINAGE EASEMENT EOW EDGE OF WATER SDH • SET DRILL HOLE LME LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT Z CENTER LINE FMN 0 FOUND DRILL NAIL LBE LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT FND FOUND PRE IRRIGATION EASEMENT BOL BOLLARD (P) PLAT FPL FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT cT GREASE TRAP BSUE BONITA SPRINGS UTILITY EASEMENT �s SANITARY MANHOLE (M) MEASURED NAVD NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 CO O CLEAN OUT (C) CALCULATED NGVD NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 SV ® SEWER VALVE (D) DEED ® WELL 4 N 0 25' 50' 100' SCALE: 1" = 50' THIS PLAN MAY HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED FROM INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE FOR REPRODUCTION REASONS TITLE SEARCH REPORT EXCEPTIONS UNSATISFIED ENCUMBRANCES: FILE NUMBER 2060-4216529: AGREEMENT NOT TO ENCUMBER OR TRANSFER PROPERTY, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2735, PAGE 747. (BLANKET IN NATURE, NOT SHOWN HEREON) EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, AND OTHER MATTERS AFFECTING THE LANDS DESCRIBED HEREIN: FILE NUMBER 2060-4216529: EXCEPTION 1 PLAT OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 26 PLAT BOOK 7 PAGES 15-16 (THOSE THAT EFFECT SHOWN HEREON) N EXCEPTION 2 RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 97, PAGE 492. (EFFECTS THE a SUBJECT PARCEL, SHOWN HEREON) Roil g EXCEPTION 3 RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 244, PAGE 948. (EFFECTS g THE SUBJECT PARCEL, SHOWN HEREON) IW Ij EXCEPTION 4 RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 881, PAGE 504. (NORTH OF I THE SUBJECT PARCEL, SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION 5 EASEMENT, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1078, PAGE 918. (DOES NOT EFFECTS THE I SUBJECT PARCEL, NOT SHOWN HEREON) I EXCEPTION 6 CONSENT AND VACATION, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1576, PAGE 2003 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1578, PAGE 1043. (EFFECTS THE SUBJECT PARCEL, I SHOWN HEREON) I EXCEPTION 7 EASEMENT, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1648, PAGE, 1199. (EFFECTS THE SUBJECT I I PARCEL, SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION 8 BILL OF SALE, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK, 2330, PAGE 610. (EFFECTS THE j I SUBJECT PARCEL, SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION 9 UTILITY FACILITIES WARRANTY DEED, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK, 2330, PAGE 612. (EFFECTS THE SUBJECT PARCEL, DESIGNATED UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN THE j I SUBJECT PARCEL) EXCEPTION 10 UTILITY EASEMENT, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2330, PAGE 614. (EFFECTS THE I SUBJECT PARCEL, SHOWN HEREON) I EXCEPTION 11 UTILITY EASEMENT, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2779, PAGE 3340. (EFFECTS THE I SUBJECT PARCEL, SHOWN HEREON) I EXCEPTION 12 UTILITY FACILITIES WARRANTY DEED AND BILL OF SALE, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1 I 2799, PAGE 1342. (EFFECTS THE SUBJECT PARCEL, SHOWN HEREON) I I------ EXCEPTION 13 UTILITY FACILITIES SUBORDINATION, CONSENT AND JOINDER, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2843, PAGE 1075. (EFFECTS THE SUBJECT PARCEL, SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION 14 NOTICES OF COMMENCEMENT OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5497, PAGE 219 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5497, PAGE 3309. (BLANKET IN NATURE, NOT SHOWN -FIR NO ID ------ 0.35' S 0. 11, W I r----- ELOISEIALYCE RECK (OR 1911, PG 1887) (IMPROVED) I I I I I HEREON) EXCEPTION 15 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5574, PAGE 2158. (BLANKET IN NATURE, NOT SHOWN HEREON) VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (PER TITLE SEARCH REPORT 2060-4216529) TRACT 64, LESS AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 45 FEET OF THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF,• TRACT 65, LESS THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF TRACT TRACT 68, LESS THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 26, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 15 AND 16, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDIN4TE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED BY THE N477ONAL GEODETIC SURVEY FOR FLORIDA EAST ZONE, 198J DATUM WITH 1990 AD/USTMENT OBTAINED UTILIZING RTK GPS OBSERVATIONS ON THE FDOT NETWORK AND REFER TO THE SOUTH LINE PINE RIDGE ROAD, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS BEING N 89'3127" E. 2. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF 77TLE SEARCH REPORT 2060-4216529 PROVIDED BY FIRST AMERICAN 777LE INSURANCE COMPANY, THROUGH 22 JANUARY 2019 AT 8:00 AM. MAY BE SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS RESERVATIONS AND/OR RES1RIC77ONS OF RECORD. ALL MATTERS OF 77TLE SHOULD BE REFERRED TO AN ATTORNEY AT LAW. 3. IRIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED W17HIN FLOOD ZONE AH, HAVING A BASE FLOOD ELEVA77ON OF 12.0' NAVD88, ZONE X 500 AND ZONE X, HAVING NO BASE FLOOD ELEVATION, PER THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY NAAGEMENT AGENCY fOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP // 12021C 0404 H, DATED 16 MAT 2012. fOOD LINES SHOWN HEREON WERE TAKEN FROM A COLLIER COUNTY GIS FILE AND ARE ASSUMED TO BE APPROXIMATE. 4. CERTAIN FEATURES REPRESENTED BY SYMBOLS MAY NOT BE SHOWN AT THEIR TRUE LOCATION AND/OR SCALE 7N ORDER TO BE ABLE TO DEPICT THEM ON THIS MAP. 5. DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN U.S SURVEY FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 6. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT ADDRESS ANY ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS, ENDANGERED WILDLIFE OR JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS, IF ANY, EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. 7. THIS CERTIFICATION IS ONLY FOR THE LANDS DESCRIBED HEREON. IT IS NOT A CER77FIC477ON OF TITLE, ZONING, SETBACKS, OR FREEDOM OF ENCUMBRANCES 8. THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND DIGITAL SEAL OF A LICENSED FLORIDA SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. NO ADD177ONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS SURVEY MAP ARE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY. 9. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, BELOW GROUND U77LI77ES AND FOUNDATIONS WERE NOT LOCATED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SURVEY. 10. BY SIGNING BELOW I CER77FY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRAC77CE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 5J-17.051, F.A. C, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 472 027, FLORIN STATUTES. 11. OWNERSHIP AND ADDRESS INFORM477ON SHOWN HEREON WAS TAKEN FROM THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER WEBSITE AT THE AWE OF THIS SURVEY. 12. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF EARTH MOVING WORK, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, OR CHANGES IN STREET -RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING THE COURSE OF THE FIELD SURVEY. 13. THE PARCELS SHOWN HEREON HAS DIRECT ACCESS TO PINE RIDGE ROAD (SR 896). 14. CONTAINING 13.53 ACRES, MORE OR LESS 15. A FOR77ON OF THE DESCRIBED BOUNDARY OF TRACT 64 /S WITHIN THE ]RAVEL LANES OF PINE RIDGE ROAD. THIS PORTION ALSO APPEARS ON THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISERS GIS MAP. NO CORNERS WERE SET ON THIS POR77ON OF THE BOUNDARY. CERTIFIED TO: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS N N N AND 7a, OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELDWORK WAS COMPLETED ON 21 JANUARY 2019. Digitally "f PSMp6758, State of Flo�daJ DeVries, pFG�4 DN:cn=TimothyJ.DeVries,PSM#6758, `� �� .•`10ENS'••� �cc �% Stateof Florida, o=This item has been h cf' electronically signed and sealed by Or // $ Timothy J.DeVries,PSM,onthedate �b Jt w _ shown below using SHA-1 _ authentication code., ou=Printed O TA EOF 74 copies of this documentare not ' F A ,✓ gq; considered signed -d seMecl nd the �0R10:'• 4} SHA-1 authentication code must be s��(k 4� verified on any electronic copies., `IfSURVE4 ttp` email-tdevries@gmdyminor.com, c=US Date: 2019.02.26 10:03:27 -05'00' TIMOTHY J. DEVRIES, P.S. M DO CATCH BASIN LIGHT POLE FL LICENSE #6758 FOR THE FIRM OD DRAINAGE MANHOLE TQ TELEPHONE MANHOLE MES C�] MITERED END TRS M TELEPHONE RISER/BOX YARDR �N TVR [C]CABLE TELEVISION RISER/BOX 0 WATER METER Q ❑E ELECTRIC MANHOLE ELECTRIC RISER/BOX/METER DRAWN BY: KJG ALTA / NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY O BACK FLOW PREVENTOR FIRE HYDRANT FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION ❑ET ® ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TRAFFIC LIGHT GradyMinor • Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey CHECKED BY: TJD UNDERGROUND OPOLE UTILITY MARKER A PORTION OF TRACTS 64 65 & 68 ARV ® + BACTERIA SAMPLE POINT AIR RELEASE VALVE SIGN SIGN 4S OAK TREE Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 JOB CODE: TSSP UNIT 26, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES IRV GV ® ® IRRIGATION VALVE/ CONTROL VALVE GAS VALVE ,� PALM TREE PINE TREE SCALE: 1" = 50� PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 15 AND 16 GSM GMM 91 c GAS METER/SERVICE GAS MARKER O 2" POLY TUBE STUB OUT Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects DATE: 7 FEBRUARY 2019 0 UTILITY POLE - WOOD UTILITY POLE - CONCRETE SR H/C x FENCE LINE STATE ROAD HANDICAP PARKING - FZ FZ FZ APPROXIMATE FLOOD ZONE LINE Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 LYING I N SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST FILE18-196-ALTA-DIG.DWG GA � GUY ANCHOR W/ WTH - 011-OVERHEAD WIRES PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 www. GTadyMlnor, com Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 SHEET: 1 of 1 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DATE Y+ll, s • ail'` '►. �r� • _ _ SUBJECT• ye PROPERTY • Pine Ridge RD yi `o r Or tj AL `'l ... 1r NMcoDD�oo-�o Oo o-opC1P -oe .smWho } 000ffditCRUwOo dfj t Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) (PL20180003710) Exhibit 1 Water and Sewer Demand Church (Religious Facility): 302 seats x 3 gal/seat/day = 906 gpd 302 seats x 3 gal/seat/day x 1.5 max. month = 1,359 gpd Religious and social organizations: 22,000 s.f. x 0.15 gpd/sf = 3,300 gpd 22,000 s.f. x 0.15 gpd/sf x 1.5 max. month = 4,950 gpd Pre-school: 200 Students @ 10 gal/student/day = 2,000 gpd 25 staff @ 15 gal/staff/day = 375 gpd Subtotal = 2,375 gpd 2,375 x 300 day/year = 712,500 gal year or 1,952 gpd 1,952 gpd x 1.5 max. month = 2,928 gpd Wastewater Average Daily: 6,581 gpd Potable Water Average Daily: 9,213 gpd Wastewater Peak Demand: 8,884 gpd Potable Water Peak Demand: 12,438 gpd August 9, 2019 Page 1 of 1 Exhibit 1 Water Sewer Demands-revl.docx W GradyNtior Civi] Enginccrs • On Surveyors • 111anRem • I andscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com 3.08.00 Environmental Data Purpose As per requirements in LDC Sections 3.08.00 and questions in the CU Checklist Preparation Of Environmental Data Preparation of Environmental Data, Environmental Data Submittal Requirement shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental science or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida Qualifications of Environmental Consultant Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. 2/96 - Present 3880 Estey Ave Naples, Florida 34104 Marco A. Espinar- Biologist Environmental Data. The following shall be submitted where applicable to evaluate projects. A) Wetlands i} Identify on Current Aerial / the location of all Collier County / SFWMD Jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System FLUCFCS A FLUCFCS map and vegetation inventory has been included. The site consists of approximately 13.52 acres. This is an existing development with approximately 4.43 acres of native vegetation. The initial development (SDP 90-128) included Tracts 65 and 68. Tract 64 (4.43 acres) was left undeveloped. The dominant habitat on this Tract 64 (4.43 acres) consists of (411) Slash Pine. This area primarily has a canopy of Slash pine, ear leaf acacia, and Melaleuca. The midstory is scattered with some cypress, cabbage palms and myrsine. B) Listed Species and Bald Eagle Nests and Nest Protection Zones i) Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the FFWCC and the USFWS. Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee. Wildlife Listed Species Study (LDC 10.02.3.A.2.m) A brief examination of the parcel found no listed animals on site. The parcel is located in the urban area and bordered by Pine Ridge Road to the north. The site does provide some functional habitat for small, medium mammals and birds. A listed species study was conducted and attached. No listed vertebrates species were found. ii) Provide Listed Plants identified in LDC Section 3.04.03 See Attached Vegetation List / FLUCCS Code Map A few TiIlandsia spp. were found on site. No other listed plants were found on site. iii) Wildlife Management Plans in accordance with LDC Section 3.04.00 See Attached Listed Species Study, Black bear and fox squirrel wildlife management plans may be required. C) Native Vegetation Preservation i} For Sites or Portions of Sites Cleared of Native Vegetation or in Agricultural Use: Not Applicable ii) Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the FLUCFCS system and provide a legend foe each of the FLUCFS codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or PPL. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve criteria pursuant to LDC section 3.05.07 have been meet. Location Maps / Aerials (LDC 10.02.3.A.2.m) Aerials and location maps have been provided. The entire parcel consists of approximately 13.52 acres. The parcel is on Pine Ridge Road in Section 15, Township 49, Range 26; in Collier County, Florida. Approximately, 4.43 acres is vegetated. The dominant forest type on this project site consists of (411) Slash pine. The site primarily has a canopy of Slash pine, ear leaf acacia, and Melaleuca. The midstory is scattered with some cypress, cabbage palms and myrsine. See Attached Location Maps, Vegetation Maps / FLUCCS Maps Native Vegetation Calculation (LDC3.05.07.A.) 3.05.07 Preservation Standards Approximately, 0.34 acres of Native vegetation was retained as part of the initial property development (SDP 90-128 for Tracts 65 and 68). The onsite 0.34 acres shall be deemed to meet the native vegetation requirements for Tracts 65 and 68. For the undeveloped Tract 64 (4.43 acres) a minimum of 15% or 0.66 acres of the existing native vegetation shall be retained. This 0.66 acres has been aligned towards the west end of the proposed parcel. The preserve extends along the west end from the north to south and along the southern property line. There are no additional established preserves to align this preserve with. A total of 1.0 acres will be retained on site. Approximately 0.34 acres from (Tracts 65, 68) and 0.66 acres (Tract 64) will be preserved. This will be consistent with Goal 6 of Collier County GMP's Objective 6.1 Protect native communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Clearly identify the location of all preserves: The preserve area has been identified on the Exhibit C Master plan. Soil Ground Water Sampling Natural Site ® MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPED' LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE U HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE, EAST OF PRESERVE, TO EXTEND 100' SOUTH PINE RIDGE ROAD E, ESTATES RESIDENTIAL MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPE'D'® LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE PROPERTY (---------- ---- ---- I I 'PROPERTY BOUNDARY ° BOUNDARY o- MINIMUM 6' WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER .' 4 GRASS PARKING BUILDING I o AREA RESERVATION (SEE' �� `.'_'.`.`.'_ NOTE #2) �.I �� �����.�.� ' E, ESTATES d m- - GRASS O E, ESTATES m`p PARKING �I`�'_-0 RESIDENTIAL <:<. v o RESIDENTIAL �,------- ��'Ci o z . 0 BUILDING Zi . SS - - - - n MINIMUM 15' WIDE TYPE'B' MINIMUM 15' !" z AREA PARKING m I ®LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH WIDE TYPE'B' 6 HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE LANDSCAPE — I BUFFER WITH 6' D Y, GRASS HIGH CHAIN LINK m PARKING i PRE-SCHOOL - FENCE® D SE TIC SYSTEM SEPTIC SYSTEM 4 LEGEND . �. ° o°o°o° B DRIVEWAY/PARKING OUTDOOR TRACT 64I TRACT 65` PLAY AREA iTRACT 65I TRACT 68` lo BUILDING MINIMUM 15' WIDE TYPE'B' " SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH® 5 E, ESTATES U HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SDP-90-128 - TRACTS 65 & 68 - 0.8± ACRES) RESIDENTIAL 0 125'— 150, SCALE: 1,� - 150' 0 PRESERVE TRACT 64 - 0.66 ACRES AND PRESERVE PER SDP-90-128 TRACT 65 & 68 - 0.34 ACRES WHEN PLOTTED @8.5x11 scACR: a TEMPLE SHALOM CEPUD il. tiroJy Minor and Associates, P. k. DOB CODE 50 ® DEVIATION GradyMinor 3RR9 Via DnI Bey Bonne Bpringa. Florida 34134 EXHIBIT C DATE eN AY 2D1 Civil Engineers . Land Surveyors . Planners . Landscape Architects VASTER PLAN FIEE mn e9 Cert. oFAdh. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business Le 26000266 REVISED: 02/26/2020 - - - BonitaSprings: 239.947.1144 a Wa. GradyMinor. com Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 SHEET 1 OF 2 SITE SUMMARY TOTAL SITE AREA: 13.5± ACRE (AC) COMMUNITY FACILITY: 11.6± AC (86%) PRESERVE: 1.0± AC (7%) LANDSCAPE BUFFERS: 0.9± AC (7%) MAXIMUM BUILDING AREA: 22,000 S.F. (TRACT 64) 50,000 S.F. (TRACT 65 AND 68) OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED: 4.05± AC (13.5± AC X 0.30) PROVIDED: 4.05± AC PRF.qFR\/F• REQUIRED: 1.0 ACRES TRACT 65 AND 68: 0.34 ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION PER SDP-90-128 TRACT 64: 0.66 ACRES (4.43± ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION X 0.15) PROVIDED: 1.0 ACRES DEVIATIONS (SEE EXHIBIT E): 1�. GRASS PARKING (APPLIES TO ENTIRE PUD) 2❑ PARKING DISTRIBUTION (APPLIES TO ENTIRE PUD) 3❑ PRESERVE SETBACK FENCE 5❑ PRESERVE STANDARDS GRASS PARKING NCITFS 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 2. PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH 4.06.02 AND 4.06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. IN ORDER TO MEET 4 THE REQUIREMENTS OF A TYPE 'B' BUFFER ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF THE PUD, A 6—FOOT—WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED ON THE MASTER PLAN. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PRESERVE DOES NOT MEET BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND g SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING WITHIN THE PRESERVE, PLANTINGS WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE 6' WIDE RESERVATION TO MEET THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. THE TYPE, SIZE, AND NUMBER OF SUCH PLANTINGS, IF NECESSARY, WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF INITIAL SDP OR PLAT AND INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE SDP OR PLAT. LEGEND TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD © G ra dyMi n o r nl nor gnU 001viaies. r A JFS ea T' ;iKllll VIu Ucl Key cgn 1 Ruling sprinigi. F1orldg 34134 EXHIBIT C uATn: ® DEVIATION MASTER PLAN NOTES '""U"n`g2019 Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects — DUME: C,,r,f Aulh. F B00051u1 Cm.,fAuth. I,130006151 i,c 26000266 REVISED: 02/26/2020 - - - BonitnSprings: 239.947. 1144 nun. r"ro'4, lllnnl% r'i,m Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 SHEET 2 OF 2 TEMPLE SHALOM LISTED SPECIES SURVEY Collier County, Florida January 2019 Prepared By: Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3880 Estey Avenue Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 263 - 2687 INTRODUCTION: This report is an account of a Listed wildlife and plants species survey recently performed on 4.43 acres of a 13.52 acre tract called Temple Shalom. Its purpose is to identify and describe key habitats and report any listed species using the site that would be at risk due to possible future development actions on the site. This survey and report are based on fieldwork performed during January 2019. The entire 13.52 acres site was examined however emphasis was placed on the vegetated 4.43 acres. DESCRIPTION: Temple Shalom consists of approximately 13.52 acres and is located in Section 15, Township 49, Range 26, in Collier County. This parcel is approximately 2 miles east of the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Interstate —75. The parcel is east of Logan Blvd on the south side on Pine Ridge Road. This parcel would be considered in the urban area and its surrounding areas are currently developed as single family homes. A drainage canal is located approximately 300 feet to the west. Approximately 4.43 acres along the western boundary are all naturally vegetated. This area consists primarily of a Slash pine canopy. Other trees are present such as cypress and cabbage palm. Exotics such as ear leaf acacia, java plum and Brazilian pepper are also present. This area would be considered upland. See Exhibit # 1 - Location Map Uplands 4.43 acres 411- Slash Pine Leaf litter is so dense that there is little diversity of ground cover. The ground cover is vegetated with occasional patches of swamp fern and saw grass. The availability of good functional habitat has been greatly restricted. This was the area examined for this report. LISTED SPECIES SURVEY: The required survey for a Listed Species Survey calls for a survey covering 100 % of the site, at prescribed transect distances per site acreage. Such a survey was conducted in January 14-1 S 2019. Established transects were oriented north - south and east - west and superimposed on an aerial map of the site. These transects were ground - located and walked by compass bearing. Early morning (0730 - 1000), mid -day (1100 - 1500) and late -day (1500 -1800) time periods were chosen to survey these transects. This survey was conducted daily for a minimum of five days. All possible species of plants and animals listed by state and federal agencies were noted. In addition, to the transects walked stationary observation was done on the developed areas including the oak hammock centrally located. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Listed Flora Several TilIandsia s -P. were seen on site. Refer to Exhibit # 2 - Cumulative Plant List Listed Fauna A description of the wildlife found onsite is provided below. Refer to Exhibit # 3 - Wildlife Species Observed Key Species Discussion: Taking into account the location and condition of the property and State and Federal listed species that could be found on or around the site include: Big Cypress Fox Squirrels The area is known as potential fox squirrel habitat. Observations were keyed to searching for signs or calls of these animals, such as leaf nests in canopy trees or the distinctive chattering of territorial squirrels. No individuals were observed foraging and/or inhabit ting the subject parcel. No chewed pines found. Florida Black Bear No individuals were observed during this survey even though Black bears are known to inhabit the general area. Special attention was given for signs such as scraps, tracks and scat. This mammal has a large home range and is known to inhabit the area. An Exhibit showing Black bear calls for this vicinity have been provided as an exhibit. Bonneted Bat The Florida bonneted bat is the largest species of bat in Florida_ Previously known as the Florida (Wagner's) mastiff bats these bats were reclassified as a separate species unique to Florida. The species can grow to a length of 6.5 inches with a wingspan of 20 inches. This is a flying mammal free to traverse great distances. Examination of all trees with potential cavities was conducted. The site does have some dead pines trees. The dead trees seem recent probably caused by Hurricane Irma. There are a few older dead trees. Special examination of all these trees were conducted. Specifically these trees were examined for any cavities and/or snags. The majority of the dead trees on site have not degraded sufficiently. The few cavities present did not meet site selection criteria. The cavities found were not high enough for a free falling bat exiting said cavity. In addition, the midstory density impedes flight. The density of Brazilian pepper and other midstory plants would impede flight patterns. No individuals and/or guano were found. This project does not anticipated to negatively impact the species. Gopher Tortoise This site does not offer suitable habitat for Gopher tortoise. Searches were keyed in areas with spoil material (mound). However, no signs or burrows were identified on any subject parcels. CONCLUSION: Taansects were walked on straight compass bearings along a grid spaced at approximately 30 yards apart for the entire parcel. Other transects were primarily meandering transects through areas of prime habitat. All transects were walked at varying times from post - dawn & mid -day to pre -sunset hours, The project site still has some recognizable character to support some limited foraging by some common small mammals and birds. Signs of small animal usage such as armadillo were readily visible. Several species of songbirds were seen utilizing this site, especially the canopy areas. The nature of the surrounding land uses and the availability of suitable habitat precludes utilization by large mammals. Several factors have contributed to the decline of the site. The site gives hints of a greater past ability to support major populations of mammals and birds. The main factors contributing to the decline of quality habitat are: 1) the level of exotic plant invasion, 2) the alteration of natural drainage and 3) encroaching development, The sites natural drainage pattern has been severely altered over the years. A drainage canal borders the parcel approximately No listed animal species or signs thereof were identified on the property. A few Tillandsia's spp. were observed on site. This is the only listed plant species observed on site. Vertebrates - Threatened Endan Bred and Species of Special Concern Species Black bear Florida panther Everglades mink Big Cypress Fox squirrel Bonneted Bat Indigo snake American alligator Gopher tortoise Gopher Frog Southeastern American kestrel Red -Cockaded woodpecker Florida Scrub Jay Wood stork Snail kite Bald eagle Limpkin Osprey White ibis Tricolored heron Snowy egret Reddish egret Little blue heron Listed Vegetation Present Absent Tillandsia spp. x x x x x x x x x x FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS CODE (Description) 411 Slash Pine — This parcel consists primarily of Slash pines, cabbage palms, ear -leaf acacia and Java plum. Single family to the south and west surrounds this area. Pine Ridge Road is located along the northern boundary. This parcel does have a small cypress area located to the north near Pine Ridge road. This area has a few cypress trees but is severely drained. Some remnant vegetation such as swamp fern can be seen. However, leaf litter, vines and the dominance of upland vegetation indicates severe draining. There is a drainage canal approximately 280 feet to the west. Common Name Slash Scientific Name Pinus Indictor Status Dominance/Stratum pine elhotti FACW Cp,C Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC M C Cypress Taxodium spp. OBL MHO Ear leaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis Exotic Cp.0 java plum *vium cumini Exotic Cp,C Melalcuca Melaleuca quinquenervia Exotic Cp,O Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic M,C cocoplum Chrysobalanus icaco FACW M,O palmetto Serona repens FACU G O Guineagrass Panicum maximum FAC- G,O Wax myrtle Myrcia cerifera FAC+ M O Hog plum Ximenia americana FAC M,O Buckthorn Bumelia reclinata FAC M,O bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum FACU G,C Florida trema Teema spp. FAC M O Beauty bush Callicarpa americana UPL M,O Myrsine Myrsine floridana FAC M,C wild coffee Psychotria nervosa UPL G,O Winged Sumac Rhus copallina UPL M O Beggers ticks Bidens alba FACW G.O salt bush Baccharis glomerulifolia FAC M,O Laurel oak Quercus virginicus FACU M,O Chocolate weed Melochia corchorifolia FAC G,O Hempweed Mikania scandens FACW G,O Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum FACW+ G,C Sword fern Nephrolepis spp. FAC GO Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU G,O Foxtail Setaria geniculata FAC G,O wiregrass Aristida stricta FAC- G,O Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- G,C Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC G,O 427 Oak Hammock This area is centrally located on the subject parcel. This area was previously preserve under a prior development order. This area consists of approximately 0.34 acres Live oak Quercus virginiana FACU M C Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia FACW C ? O p' Slash pine p Pinus elliotti FACW Cp,C Cypress Taxodium spp. OBL M O Cabbage palm Sahal palmetto FAC M,C Wild Pines wired -leaved VINES T. setacea Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia Virginia creeper Ampelopsis quinquefolia Cat -briar Smilax spp. Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans III Single Family 172 Church 1 Religious Facilities 510 Canal ABREVIATIONS — INDICATOR STATUS - FDA/T FAC G,C FAC G.0 FAC G,C FAC G,O Canopy (Cp), Midstory (M), Ground Cover (G) Dominant (D), Common (C), Occasional (0) Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAC), Upland (UPL) WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED Common Name Amphibian & Reptiles: Brown anole Birds Dove- mourning Brown Thrasher Northern flicker Bluej ay Carolina wren Gray catbird Northern mockingbird Cardinal Mammals: Virginia opossum Raccoon Nine -banded armadillo species Aeolis sWei Zenaida macroura Toxostoma rufum Cola tes auratus C anocitta cristata Thryothorus ludovicianus Dumetella carolinensis Mimus Poly lg ottos Richmondena cardinalis Didelphis vir iniana Procyon lotor Dasypus noverracinctu Status Ilk ;€ n 4 A� f#a + IYI GF7YY7.7� LV 1.7 k TRANSECTSI . Labels Drawing � �- Points Drawing N STATIONARY Lines Drawing OBSERVATION PoiygonsDrawing Selected Custom Parcels .. Streets Mapwise County Boundaries f Parcel Outlines - 0 1 -�o 246 36C ft Copyright 2017 Mapwise, Inc. All rights reserved. vo w,mapwise.com. This map Is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. Mapwise and its suppliers assume on responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. 9 I 0 PINE RIDGE RQ Note: All information is based on the latest data as made available by Florida Fish & Wildlife Commission (FWC 2019) Q Subject Property ":j Lnirr 1-Mile Radius 0 Black Bear Related Calls (FWC 2016-2018) FWC Black Bear Range Florida (2016) Black Bear Presence Abundant Common Occasional Rare Temple Shalom Collier County, Florida. 0 f �asEh Tack EARTH TECH ENVIRONMENTAL, IrLC 10600 JOLEA AVENUE BONITA SPR¢NGS, FL 34135 PHONE (239) 304-0030 FAX (239) 774-0800 WWW.ETEFLORfOA.COM Environmental, LLC FWC Black Bear Information 2RafECT NO. SCpG 9/15/19 NIA AS SHOWN DocuSign Envelope ID:45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F JMB TRANSP❑RTATI❑N ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT For Temple Shalom PUD (Pine Ridge Road, Collier County, Florida) ,dune 14, 2019 Revised April 7, 2020 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee — $500.00 TIS (Major Study) Review Fee=$1,500.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, )NC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW DocuSignedb_y, I °14j1111111111i1I1r, NAi?L.ES, FLORIDA 341 1 9 �Awtt,S i�jolln�S 4°,c' M. E3A/V E519D679D23 E47F..�* ,� G�f�,S'� CERTIFICATE OF AUTH❑RIZATION No. 27B3G (PROJECT No. 19021 2) 0 rg 27�� � :,d• JAM99M. BANI(rJ5 �. , FL0 FI 10A REG. Net �"60' DocuSign Envelope ID:45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F TABLE OF CONTENTS Conclusions 2 Methodology 3 Scope of Project 4 Table A - Proposed Development 4 Figure 1 - Project Location & E+C Road Classification 4.1 Site Plan 4.2 Project Generated Traffic 5 Table B - Net New Trips Generated 6 Table 1A - Existing Land Use Trip Generation Computations 6.1 Table 1B - Proposed Land Use Trip Generation Computations (Average Weekday & Weekend Conditions) 6.2 Table 1C - Proposed Land Use Trip Generation Computations (Special Events Weekday) 6.3 Existing + Committed Road Network 7 Project Traffic Distribution 7 Area of Significant Impact 7 Figure 2 - Project Traffic Distribution 7.1 Table 2 - Area of Impact/R.oad Classification 7.2 Site Access Conditions S Figure 3 - Project Traffic Assignment (Typ. Weekday) 8.1 Figure 4 - Project Traffic Assignment (Special Events) 8.2 2019 thru 2022 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions 9 Table 3 - 2019 & 2022 Link Volumes 9.1 Table 4 - 2022 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 9.2 Appendix 10 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F Conclusions Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that the proposed rezoning of the Temple Shalom to a CFPUD will not have a negative impact upon the surrounding road network. It was verified that all roadways, within the project's area of influence, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the additional site -generated traffic associated with increasing the size of the existing worship/administrative/daycare structures from 44,400 square feet to a total of 50,000 square feet and increasing the daycare enrollment from 70 to 200 children and constructing a new building that will house 22,000 square feet of religious/civic assembly space and associated offices. As determined, the road network will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for the foreseeable future and the project will not create any off -site transportation deficiencies that need to be mitigated. Site Access & 4nsite Parking Vehicular ingress/egress for Temple Shalom and daycare was previously established via one (t) full median opening on Pine Ridge Road. The access is located near the site's eastern boundary and it has a westbound left -ingress turn lane and an eastbound right - ingress turn lane and a shared left/right exit lane. It was determined that this access will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service after the completion of the proposed expansion, but will require law enforcement personnel to control traffic during special events as discussed below- At the time of acquiring development permits, the access will be reevaluated to detcrmine needed improvements (e.g., extending the westbound left turn lane, additional site egress lane, etc.). In order to accommodate the additional traffic demands generated by the proposed land uses, a second point of ingress/egress on Pine Ridge Road will be constructed. The new access will be located to the west of the existing full access and will be limited to right- in/out turning movements. The design of the right-in/out access, which will warrant a right -ingress turn lane, will be finalized at the time of seeking development approval. Although Temple Shalom has full access on Pine Ridge Road, it is expected that some drivers that intend to exit to the west will choose to perform a downstream u-turn vs. turning left -out at the median opening. To accommodate this movement, it is proposed to construct a turn lane at an existing median opening that is approximately 0.2 miles east of the site's full access. The turn lane will provide drivers with a safe means of reversing their direction of travel. In conjunction with constructing the downstream u-turn lane, an eastbound -to -westbound "No U-Turn" sign will be posted at the site's full access where there is not a turn lane to accommodate that type of movement. The purpose of posting the "No U-Turn" sign will be to cause motorists to use the newly constructed downstream turn lane. The rezoning request also includes increasing the campus' shared -use parking capacity and improving on -site circulation by interconnecting the parking areas. The parking areas will also be interconnected to both points of access on Pine Ridge Road. 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F Special Events — Parking, Traffic Demands & Site Access Traffic Controls The common daily functions of Temple Shalom include various religious gatherings, religious studies, youth and adult activities/classes, as well as providing daycare service. These various functions occur on weekdays and weekends, except for the daycare that is only open to the public on weekdays. In addition to typical daily operations, Temple Shalom occasionally hosts special events or has unusually high -attendance religious gatherings (i.e., 400 or more attendees). These types of high -demand events include non- typical or high -demand religious ceremonies, weddings, civic gatherings, etc. It is planned that some of these events will be held within the proposed civic/religious assembly building. These special events are and will continue to be scheduled in a manner so they do not coincide with the normal operations of the Temple's religious practices or daycare; and the events will not have overlapping start/completion times. As part of the amendment request, the shared -use parking capacity will be increased. The additional parking spaces will be more than adequate to accommodate campus' typical parking demands, as well as provide needed capacity for special events. Most often, these special events will occur between the hours of 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM. However, this study evaluates the site's ingress/egress capacity and safety provisions during weekday PM peak demand periods (i.e., 4 to 6 PM). Because the proposed 22,000 square feet of civic/religious assembly space can accommodate the greatest number of attendees (estimated to be up to 706 people), the traffic conditions were analyzed based upon the maximum occupancy of this space during PM peak hour weekday operations and based upon normal operations of the synagogue and the daycare. During these high traffic demand conditions, the study determined that the employment of a law enforcement officer is necessary to safely maintain ingress/egress for special events, which is defined as 400 or more attendees at any event. Furthermore, it was determined that the site's full access and east/west traffic flow on Pine Ridge Road will operate at LOS C or better when controlled by law enforcement personnel during these peak demand special event traffic conditions. Therefore, the PUD must be subject to a condition that all events having 400 or more attendees, shall employ law enforcement personnel to control traffic flow at the PUD's access on Pine Ridge Road. This condition shall apply to weekdays and weekends and regardless of the time of day that the high - demand event occurs. Methodology On May 1, 2019, a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Methodology Report was submitted to the office of Collier County Transportation Planning Department. The .$500.00 methodology meeting fee will he paid at the time of submitting the zoning amendment application. A copy of the TIS methodology has been provided in the appendix (refer to pages M1 thru M11). Note, the project's traffic distribution was subsequently revised based upon additional information provided by the owners/operators of the proposed synagogue and daycare land uses, and the project's build -out has been extended to the year 2022. DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F Scope of Project Temple Shalom is an existing place of worship with daycare services and other associated functions (e.g., administrative offices, religious education, youth and adult activities, etc.). It is proposed to rezone the property to a CFPUD and increase the size of the existing worship/administrative/daycare structures from 44,400 square feet to a total of 50,000 square feet, and increase the daycare attendance from 70 to 200 children, which will are and will continue to be located on Tracts 65 & 68. It is also proposed to construct a new building on Tract 64 that will house 22,000 square feet of associated office/assembly space and construct one (1) additional access on Pine Ridge Road, which will be restricted to right-in/out turning movements. The site is located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road and approximately three-quarters of a mile to the west of Collier Boulevard, within Collier County. It is expected that the proposed improvements will be completed by the year 2022. Table A Proposed Land Use Land Uses Existing Size/Capacity Proposed Size/Capacity Net Difference Tract 65 & 681 44,400 s.f. 50,000 s.f.' + 5,600 s.f. Synagogue, Admin Offices 302 Seats 302 Seats and Daycare 70 Students 200 Students + 130 Students Tract 64 None 22,000 s.f. + 22,000 s.f. Assembly Space and Offices 1. The 302-seat synagogue, administrative offices and 200-student daycare use are all contained within the 50,000 square feet of floor space on Tracts 65 and 68. Depending on the weekday activities, the daycare will occupy a range of available floor space of 10,000 s.f. to 15,000 s.f., but the maximum enrollment will be no more than 200 students. 4 DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F I I Vanderbilt Beach Rd I NORTH I nF.T,S. Z Golden Gate Boulevard 0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — v a 0 m 0 m > m C 6 7 O O m N U I df Pine Ridge Road I I White Boulevard — — — — — — — — — — I l � 11 th Ave SW I 13th Ave SW I 15th Ave SW f Green Boulevard I I 'o I I � m � I I j m I o I I I m Golden Gate Parkway --------- LEGEND I a I ✓ 6--LANE ARTERIAL +� n I ✓ I 4-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR — — — — — Ca I / / I 2-LANE ARTERIAL o I ✓ ✓ I 2-LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL � l I i RAIL ROAD —^^ I I ✓✓ I JIM� TRANSR0RTATION ENGINEERINs, INC. Temple Shalom PUD Project Location & FIGURE 1 Roadway Classification May 1, 2019 4. N E, ESTATES RESIDENTIAL MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPE 'D'® PINE RIDGE ROAD LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH ® MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPED' 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH - DECORATIVE FENCE — 1L� 6` HIGH DECORATIVE 00000°eo o°o° M —Q d~ zO O LLJ &� 4FENCE, EAST O PRESERVETO S w cn EXTEND 100' SOUTH-- _� - GRASS PARKING o00000000D o li ' I $ 4El I op0000000 o m PROPERTY_4 { i �_z - ---- ��T�i ���° BOUNDARY °000a I PROPERTY BOUNDARY MINIMUM fi' WIDE { 4 CRASS PARKIN LI J. • I BUILDING 0 LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATICN (SEE AREA o NOTE #2) m GRASS rn ..'i`❑�. g. p E, ESTATES E, ESTATES -m' v PARKING '- .� _ r ° m I RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL [kF <- ----- D ' ' - - 7' y BUILDING Z g y z MINIMUM 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' MINIMUM 15`°' m AREA z A G) -- a m a SPARKING WIDE TYPE 'B' ° ®LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH ....I Z r e o LANDSCAPE O _ 1 8 6 HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE BUFFER WITH 6' y GP I I HIGH CHAIN LINK ..' I PARKING PRE-SCHOOL FENCE r D }' _ o° oF SE SEPTIC SYSTEM LE- LEND' DRIVEWAY/PARKING OUTDOOR BUILDING gTRACT 641 TRACT 65 PLAY AREA `TRACT 651TRACT 68,.- MINIMUM 16' WIDE TYPE'B' SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH® s LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SDP-90-128 - TRACTS 65 & 68) E, ESTATES 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE o 1zs 15� RESIDENTIAL SCALE: 1" = 150' p PRESERVE TRACT 64 AND PRESERVE PER SDP-90-12$ TRACT 65 & 68 WHEN PLOTTED Q8.5x11 6CALE: # DEVIATION TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD , ❑ myMinor e' erDdy Mhlpr Antl hnrf°rla vc r, y :{EIIIO V[p UE!i li°y SDB CODE: Panllu Springs. Morels 34154 TF1. ,6 EXHIBIT C arr: Civil Engineers . Land Surveyors . Planners . i.,andscape Architects MASTER PLAN wr .mEo ruE NquE: ccrl.wnum.eeDoo3tsl Culor,4m1,.1.6°0051G1 eua­I.csGannsnG REVISEQ' 14/24/2019 ffc­­cr-rm ` Bonita Springs: 239.9,171144 nwu. Cradybflmu r. rom Fort.Mycrs: 289.690.4390 a}II;ET I QF 2 0 0 0 C (Q 7 m 0 m 0 m DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F Project Generated Traffic Traffic that can be expected to be generated by the project was estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 101' Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses was relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was concluded that land use codes "Church" (LUC 560), "Day Care" (LUC 565 SIC Code 8351) and Small Office Building (LUC 712 associated with SIC Codes 8641,8661 & 6732) were most appropriate in estimating the existing and the proposed site -generated trips. Although the daycare use is contained within the 50,000 square feet on Tract 65 and Tract 68, the trips were estimated based upon the maximum number of students vs. the daycare's occupied floor space, which varies between 10,000 s.£ to 10,000 s.f. depending on the daily activities. Also, weekday trips associated with the total 50,000 s.f. were estimated based upon the rates for LUC 560. Therefore, the total trips estimated are consider a conservatively greater estimate because there is a slight overlap in trips estimated for the 50,000 s.f. as church space and the 200 daycare students. Note, the trip estimates for the proposed 22,000 square feet of civic/religious assembly space/offices was increased by 50% to reflect a higher use of floor space than is typical of general office uses. That is, general office has an average use rate of 1 person/150 square feet and it is expected that the proposed space will have a usage of I person/100 square feet. In addition to the average weekday site -generated trips, the proposed civic/religious assembly space will occasionally host special events that can accommodate up to 706 attendees. Therefore, to account for trips generated during these special events, the ITE trip rates established for worship assemblies was used. The trips were determined based upon the maximum attendance of 706 people, and the trips were also doubled to account for a lower ride -share rate for non -religious gatherings. In order to determine the project's net new traffic, the estimated trips for the existing uses were subtracted from the estimated total trips for the proposed. That is, Proposed Development Trips less Existing Development Trips = Net New Trips Table 1 A (refer to page 4.1) provides a detail of the estimated total trips for the existing land uses and Table I (refer to page 4.2) gives the trips for the existing + proposed land uses. Table B summarizes the results from Tables IA and Table 113, as well as depicts the net increase in site -generated trips. 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F Table B Net New Trips Generated (Proposed Trips Less Existing Trips) Net New Net New Net New Weekend Daily Trips AM Peak PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Special Events (ADT) Hour (vph) (vph) (vph) (vph) Existing Land Uses 586 70 74 427 See Table 1A Existing & Proposed 1,618 221 237 427 Land Uses See Table 1 S Net New Trips 1,0322 1512 1632 0 8912 99 in/ 52 exit 65 in/ 98 exit 433 /458 exit 2. The daycare use is contained within the 50,000 square feet on Tract 65 and Tract 68, but the daycare trips were estimated based upon the maximum number of 200 students vs. occupied floor space, which varies between 10,000 s.f. to 15,000 s.f. depending on the daily activities. The weekday trips associated with the church, which are fairly low during normal weekdays, were estimated based upon the rates for LUC 560 and using the total floor space of 50,000 s.f., which results in a slightly conservative estimate of the total site -generated trips. I DocuSign Envelope ID:45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F TABLE 1A TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Temple Shalom EXISTING LAND USE - WEEKDAY Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 560 Church (Weekday) 44,400 s.f. 565 Day Care Center 70 Students Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 560 Church (Weekday) 44,400 s.f. Daily Traffic (ADT) = T=6.14(X) + 17.09= 290 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.36(X) - 0.74 = 15 vph 9 / 6 vph 60% Enter/ 40% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.37(X) + 3.90 = 20 vph 9 / 11 vph 45% Enter/ 55% Exit = 565 Day Care Center (Weekday) 70 Students Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 3.56(X) + 47.23 = 296 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.66(X) + 8.42= 55 vph 29 / 26 vph 53% Enter/ 47% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X)+0.29 = 54 vph 25 / 29 vph 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = WEEKDAY TOTALS Daily Traffic (ADT) = 586 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = 70 vph 38 / 32 vph PM Peak Hour (vph) = 74 vph 34 / 40 vph EXISTING LAND USE - SATURDAY & SUNDAY Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 560 Church (Weekend) 302 Seats 560 Church (Weekend) 44,400 s.f. Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 560 Church (Weekend) 302 Seats Daily Traffic (ADT) = T=1.21(X) = 365 ADT Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.63(X) - 76.74 = 114 vph 56 / 58 vph 49916 Enter/51% Exit = 560 Church (Weekend) 44,400 s.f. Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 27.63(X) = 1,227 ADT Peak Hour (vph) _ T=8.18(X)+63.81= 48% Enter/ 52% Exit = 427 vph 205 1222 vph L%2 DocuSign Envelope ID:45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F TABLE 113 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Temple Shalom EXISTING + PROPOSED LAND USE - WEEKDAY Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 560 Church (Weekday) 50,000 s.f. 565 Day Care Center 200 Students 712 Small Office Building 22,000 s.f. Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation_ Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 560 Church (Weekday) 50,000 s.f. Daily Traffic (ADT) = T=6.14(X) + 17.09= 324 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T- 0.36(X) - 0.74 = 17 vph 10 / 7 vph 60% Enter/ 40% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.37(X) + 3.90 = 22 vph 10 / 12 vph 45% Enter/ 55% Exit = 565 Day Care Center (Weekday) 200 Students Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 3.56(X) + 47.23 = 759 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.66(X) + 8.42= 140 vph 74 / 66 vph 53% Enter/ 47% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X)+0.29 = 134 vph 63 / 71 vph 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = LUC 712 Daily Traffic (ADT) = AM Peak Hour (vph) _ PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= [16.19(X)] x 1.5 = (See Note No.1) T= [1.92(X)] x 1.5 = 83% Enter/ 18% Exit = T= [2.45(X)] x 1.5 = 32% Enter/ 68% Exit = 534 ADT 63 vph 52 / 11 vph 81 vph 26 / 55 vph WEEKDAY TOTALS Daily Traffic (ADT) = 1,618 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = 221 vph 137 / 84 vph PM Peak Hour (vph) = 237 vph 99 / 138 vph Notes: Trip estimates for the proposed 22,000 square feet of assembly space/office were doubled to reflect a higher use off I oor space than is typical of general office space. That is, general office has an average use rate of 1 person/150 square feet and it is expected that the proposed space will have a useage rate of 1 person/100 square feet. 6.2 DocuSign Envelope ID:45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F TABLE 1C TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Temple Shalom EXISTING + PROPOSED LAND USE - WEEKDAY (Special Events) Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 560 Church (Weekday) 50,000 s.f. 565 Day Care Center 200 Students N/A Special Events (Weekday) 706 Attendants Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 560 Church (Weekday) 50,000 s.f. Daily Traffic (ADT) = T=6.14(X) + 17.09= 324 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.36(X) - 0.74 = 17 vph 10 / 7 vph 60% Enter/ 40% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.37(X) + 3.90 = 22 vph 10 / 12 vph 45% Enter/ 55% Exit = 565 Day Care Center (Weekday) 200 Students Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 3.5.6(X) + 47.23 = 759 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.66(X) + 8.42= 140 vph 74 / 66 vph 53% Enter/ 47% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X)+0.29 = 134 vph 63 / 71 vph 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = Special Events (Trips based upon ITE's Church Sunday Worship Rates x 2) Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 2 x [1.21(X)] = (See Note No_1) 1,709 ADT Peak Hour (vph) = WEEKDAY TOTALS (Special Events) T= 2 x [0.63(X) - 76.741 _ 49% Enter/ 51% Exit = Daily Traffic (ADT) - PM Peak Hour (vph) _ 736 vph 361 / 375 vph 2,792 ADT 893 vph 434 / 459 vph Notes: The Assembly Hall can host special events for up to 706 attendees. Therefore, to account for trips generated during these special events, the ITE trip rates established for worship assemblies based on 706 attendants was used. The trip estimates were also doubled to account for a lower ride -share rate for non -religious gatherings. 6.3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F Existing + Committed Road Network Figure 1 and Table 2 provide a detail of the surrounding E + C roadways. Table 2 also depicts the nearby roadways respective minimum level of service performance standards and capacity. Project Generated Traffic Distribution The project's net new traffic was distributed to the surrounding road network based upon Iogical means of ingress/egress, current and future traffic patterns in the area, demographics, as well as growth trends for the surrounding areas. Table 2 and Figure 2 provide a detail of the traffic distributions to the adjacent road network. Area of Significant Impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2 describes the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the project's area impact are shown in Table 2. 7 DocuSign Envelope ID:45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F A i 4 m 3 O m O U O --J li} 45% _r u� Green Boulevard 11 th Ave SW � 1 13th Ave SW 15th Ave SW Vanderbilt Beach Rd NORTH N.T.S. 1HiGolden Gate Boulevard ------------------- .6 5% While Boulevard 0 f m c 4 I I 0 I Golden Gate Parkway I ---- ---------1 O I ' coj /de j LEGEND EnI //i 007. E—� PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT .0000'I %MT'RAN5POFZTATION ENGFNEERING, INC. Temple Shalom PUD Project -Generated FIGURE 2 Traffic Distribution December 24, 2019 �.1 AVERAGE WEEKDAY OPERATIONS Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 98 Exiting Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) = 65 Entering 31.1 County Road 951 31.2 48.0 Logan Blvd 49.0 68.0 Pine Ridge Road 125.a 125.b N TABLE 2 PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT 0 0 c Cn cQ 0 m 0 m 0 CD LOS Service Project Project PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significar c Class LOS v h d % Dist. v ( phpd) Pk Dir (vph) DiR Standard Impact Impact P Golden Gate Blvd to Pine Ridge 6D D 3000 15.0% 15 N 10 S 2% 0.49% NO - Pine Ridge to Green Blvd 61) D 3000 15.0% 15 S 10 N 2% 0.49% NO c, c c Vanderbilt to Pine Ridge Rd 2U D 1000 5% 5 N 3 S 2% 0.49% NO Pine Ridge Rd to Green Blvd 4D D 1900 15% 15 S 10 N 2% 0.77% NO 1-75 to Logan Blvd 6D E 2800 45% 44 w 29 E 2% 1.58% NO Logan Blvd to Site 4D D 2400 65% 64 w 42 E 2% 2.65% YES Site to Collier Blvd 41) D 2400 35% 34 E 23 w 2% 1.43% NO SPECIAL EVENTS WEEKDAY OPERATIONS Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 419 Exiting Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) = 400 Entering LOS Service Project Project PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significant Class LOS yi phpd) % Dist. y( phpd) Pk Dir (vph) DiR Standard Impact Impact 68.0 Pine Ridge Road 1-75 to Logan Blvd 6D E 2800 45% 189 w 180 E 2% 6.73% YES 125.a Logan Blvd to Site 4D D 2400 65% 272 w 260 E 2% 11.35% YES 125.b Site to Collier Blvd 4D D 2400 35% 147 E 140 w 2% 6.11 % YES DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F Site Access Conditions Vehicular ingress/egress for Temple Shalom and daycare was previously established via one (1) full median opening on Pine Ridge Road. The access is located near the PUD's eastern boundary and it has a westbound left -ingress turn lane and an eastbound right - ingress turn lane and a shared left/right exit lane. At the time of acquiring development permits for the proposed expansion, the existing median opening will be reevaluated to determine if improvements are warranted (e.g., extending the westbound left turn lane, additional site egress lane, etc.). In order to accommodate the additional traffic demands generated by the proposed land uses, a second point of ingress/egress on Pine Ridge Road will be constructed. The new access will be located to the west of the existing full access and will be limited to right- in/out turning movements. The design of the right-in/out access, which will warrant a right -ingress turn lane, will be finalized at the time of seeking development approval. Although the PUD has full access on Pine Ridge Road, it is expected that some drivers that intend to exit to the west will choose to perform a downstream a -turn vs. turning left - out at the median opening. To accommodate this movement, it is proposed to construct a turn lane at an existing median opening that is approximately 0.2 miles east of the site's full access. The turn lane will provide drivers with a safe means of reversing their direction of travel. In conjunction with constructing the downstream u-turn lane, an eastbound -to -westbound "No U-Turn" sign will be posted at the site's full access where there is not a turn lane to accommodate that type of movement. The purpose of posting the "No U-Turn" sign will be to cause motorists to use the newly constructed downstream turn lane. Figure 3 depicts the turning movement volumes that are anticipated to occur at the project's access on Pine Ridge Road during typical weekday operations at project build - out. Figure 4 details the turning movement volumes during weekday special events at project build -out. An analysis of the site's full access (STOP sign egress control) on Pine Ridge Road was performed and it was determined that during typical weekday conditions and during AM and PM peak hours, the site's full access will operate at acceptable levels of service. However, during special events (i.e., 400 or more attendees of a hosted event), it was determined that a law enforcement officer will need to control traffic in order to maintain safe ingress/egress. It was found that east/west traffic flow on Pine Ridge Road will operate at LOS C or better when controlled by law enforcement personnel during these peak demand special events. Note, to emulate traffic control by law enforcement, the intersection was analyzed as a signalized intersection. Therefore, the PUD must be subject to a condition that all events having 400 or more attendees, shall employ law enforcement personnel to control traffic flow at the PUD's access on Pine Ridge Road. This condition shall apply to weekdays and weekends and regardless of the time of day that the high -demand event occurs. DocuSign Envelope ID:45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F 0z Z Posted "No U—Turn" M m � � � N N 00 N Proposed U—Turn Lane M :2M a a¢ M fl- _t N 0) CD ::E fL aCL .. a .. co M cp (0 N � a a �, a a ¢ AM 26: PM 29 I AM 47 PM Temple Shalom 54 Full Access `lI AM 18 PM 9 I I Q_ a a_ _ O ry ,`0 a Is M a_ a m Q r1 �L 1 -- AM 11 : PM 55 Seconda ry Riaht—in/out Access 1 I � n ei a Ln L N � � Q g Q 'ti1IMTRANSPQRTATIQN ENGINEERING, INC. Temple Shalom PUD February 28, 2020 Tract 65 & 68 Trips AM 84 In / 73 Out PM 73 In / 83 Out Tract 64 Trips AM 52 In / 11 out PM 26 In / 55 Out LEGEND AM 35 : PM 34 ► Existing Background Traffic AM 35 PM 34 0 Tract 65 & 68 Temple Shalom & Daycare Traffic Assign. AM 55 FW 34 1P Tract 64 Traffic Assignment Project -Generated Traffic Assignment FIGURE 3 (Typ. Weekday Conditions) DocuSign Envelope ID:45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F r7 cD U N N Proposed U—Turn Lane _ a a [� r O z z O 0 IL rn `t : N g (L 0- PM 29 1 I PM 54 II• F PM 244 Temple Shalom Full Access PM '{2� Sheriff Dept. Traffic Control p 0 During High Volume Special Events N -N a CD `L a ^0 a C 0 d � 0 U L Q Of I 1 :_ 0) � m � c_ � 1 PM 131 1 Tract 65 & 68 Trips PM 73 In / 83 Out Tract 64 Trips I F Secondary Right—in/out Access PM 361 In / 375 out rO a r0 N .t 0 LCj aaa n ro c0 N a LEGEND PM 34 --1 Existing Background Traffic PM 34 0 Tract 65 & 68 Temple Shalom & Daycare PM Traffic Assign. PM 34 0 Tract 64 PM Traffic Assignment +TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. Project -Generated Temple Shalom PUD Traffic Assignment FIGURE April 6, 2020 (Weekday Special Events) DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F 2019 thru 2022 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions In order to establish 2019 thru 2022 project build -out traffic conditions, two forecasting methods were used. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour/peak direction and annual growth rates were derived from the 2019 Collier County AUIR Report. Using the annual growth rate, the 2022 background traffic conditions were determined, which are depicted in Table 3. The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips (trip bank) identified in the 2019 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season, peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The vested trips "+" 2022 background traffic, volumes are depicted in Table 3. The greater of the two values produced by the two forecasting procedures was then considered to reflect the 2022 background traffic. The net new project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 4 provides a summary of the 2019 thru 2022 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity. As shown, all project impacted roadways will continue to operate at the County's adopted minimum level of service thresholds at project build -out. 0 oms)nEnvelope ID: 45ee7Ea9Gk9Go589eg9mF 9«{ W § / f D J J § J J° - - 7 7 0 £@ M A o > Z_ k a b / / / f < G w w w M � W � � � § � \ LU W w CD m � � a = \ o 0 0 k < I - � w > 7..-" CD � O N a. co \ § / q.| 0 0 c Cn cQ 0 m 0 m TABLE 4 CD 2022 ROADWAY LINK VOLUME/CAPACITY ANALYSIS 01 co N co D AVERAGE WEEKDAY OPERATIONS V W n 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 n 2019 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build-O Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak He PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Direct o, tvphpd) LOS v{ phpd) Dir LOS [Vphpdj Dir LvphJ Dir v h d v{ phpd) vlc Ratio co LOS 68.0 Pine Ridge Road 1-75 to Logan Blvd 2160 D 2292 E ❑ 44 W 29 E 2321 2800 0.83 D 125.a Logan Blvd to Site 1540 D 1634 E D 64 W 42 E 1677 2400 0.70 C 125.b Site to Collier Blvd 1540 C 1634 E C 34 E 23 VV 1669 2400 0.70 T co C w n N SPECIAL EVENTS WEEKDAY OPERATIONS 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2019 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build -Out Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Direction v( phpd) 105 v{ phpd) Dir LOS (vphpd) Dir {vph) Dir v( phpo) of phpd) vlc Ratio LOS 68.0 Pine Ridge Road 1-75 to Logan Blvd 2160 D 2292 E D 189 W 180 E 2472 2800 0.88 D 125.a Logan Blvd to Site 1540 D 1634 E D 272 W 260 E 1894 2400 0.79 C 125.b Site to Collier Blvd 1540 C 1634 E C 147 E 140 VV 1781 2400 D.74 C DocuSign Envelope ID:45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F APPENDIX 10 DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F mlt two- Ta'yttop-ControlReport General Information Site Information Analyst JMB Transportation Eng Intersection Temple Shalom Site Access Agency/Co, Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/24/2019 East/West Street Pine Ridge Road Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Temple Shalom Site Access Time Analyzed AM Pic Typical Weekday Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Project Build -out Lanes J d ! 4- i~ t. I+Yt r t East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1 U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T R L T L R Volume, V (veh/h) 533 59 41 2022 47 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%} 3 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade {%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 4.1 7.5 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 4.16 6.80 6.90 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.23 3.50 3.30 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 43 49 26 Capacity, c (veh/h) 947 189 723 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.26 0.04 95% Queue Length, Cbs (veh) 0.1 1.0 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.0 30.6 10.2 Level of Service, LOS A D B Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.2 23.5 Approach LOS C Copyright © Z019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS71M TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 12/26/2019 9:12:03 AM AM Weekday.xtvv Al DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B26A7E-3F7C 4467-AD87-602F1F89793F nr rr.r op -Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst JMB Transportation Eng intersection Temple Shalom Site Access Agency/Co. Jurisdiction Date Performed 12124/2019 East/West Street Pine Ridge Road Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Temple Shalom Site Access Time Analyzed PM Pk Typical Weekday Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0,25 Project Description Project Build -out Lanes Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 7 Major street: East-West Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1 U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Numberof Lanes 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T R L T L R Volume, V (veh/h) 1686 47 31 687 53 29 Percent Heavy Vehicles {%) 3 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked 0.000 0.000 0.000 Percent Grade (°/a) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 4.1 7.5 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 4.16 6.80 6.90 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow -.Up Headway (sec) 2.23 3.50 3.30 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 33 56 31 Capacity, c (veh/h) 328 101 291 We Ratio 0.10 0.55 0.11 95% Queue Length, %.5 (veh) 0.3 2.6 0.4 Ccntrol Delay (s/veh) 17.2 77.6 18.9 Level of Service, LOS C F C Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.8 56.6 Approach LOS F Copyright © 2019 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7UM TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 12/26/2019 9:37:41 AM PM Weekday.xtw DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F j , 1\Ja7, %alul «.. ,.,,.,.section Results Summary General Information Intersection Information 4,0� r i- 4 r.+ r; Agency Duration, h 0.25 Analyst JMB Transportation Eng Analysis Date 12/24/2019 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.92 Urban Street Pine Ridge Road Analysis Year 2021 Project Build -out Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Temple Site Access File Name PM Special Events.xus Project (Description IPM Peak Special Events - Sheriff Control Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), vehlh 1780.1 47 155 665 297 29 uSignal Information's Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 a 4 Offset, s -� 0 s Reference Point End I Uncoord �� ` x„-: Green 13.2 77.2 23.6 0-0 0.0 0.0 inated - No Simult. Gap ENV On Yellow. 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed. Simult. Gap N/S On Red 0.0 5.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ::. Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SSL SBT Assigned Phase 2 1 6 8 Case Number 7.3 2.0 4.0 9.0 Phase Duration, s _ 79.2 15.2 94.4 25.6 Change Period, ( Y+R ),s 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 Max Allow Headway (MAH ), s 0.0 3.1 0.0 3.1 Queue Clearance Time ( g $ }, s 13.0 22-9 Green Extension Time (g e ), s 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.7 Phase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 I Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 2 1�2.1- 6 = 3 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 1935 51 168 723 3.2.3 32 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate s ve ( ), h/h1ln 1809 1610 1810 1809 ' 1810 1610 Queue Service Time (g, ),s 49.2 0.6 11.0 6.9 20.9 1.9 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g } s 49.2 0.6 .6 11.0 6.9 20.9 1.9 Green Ratio (glC } 0.64 0.84 0.11 0.77 0.20 0.20 Capacity (c ), veh/h 2326 1352 199 2785 356 317 Volume -to -Ca acit Ratio X 4.832 0.038 0.845 0.260 0.907 0.099 ;. ... . Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In (95 th percentile) 667.9 ; 6.1 221.5 97 368.9 34.4 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In (95 th percentile) 26.7 0.2 8.9 3.9 14.8 " 1,4 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ } ( 95 th percentile} 0.00 0 00 0.00 . 0.00 0 00 0.00 -- Uniform Delay ( d i }, slveh 16.4 1.6 1512.14 4 0 47.1 39.5 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), slveh 36 0.1 3.8 0.2 3.6#39 *5J Initial Queue D,...�:.. -.�, .... ..�. elay (ds), s/veh 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 ° O.D . Control Delay ( d), s/veh 20.1 1.6 56.1 4.2 50.7 Levef of Service (LOS) C A E A D D _- . Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 19.6 ; B 14.0 B 49.7 D 0.0 Intersection Delay, s/veh l LOS 21.4 C Multimodal Results EB WB NS SB Pedestrian LOS Score 1 LOS 2.2 B 0.6 A 2.9 C 2.9 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 2.1 B 1.2 A F Copyright © 2019 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS71 Streets Version 7.3 Generated: 1212612019 9:13:58 AM A3 H 535 CR 896 (Pine Ridge Road) east of Logan Blvd 2019 Sta 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Hour ENDING E/B W/B TOTAL E/B W/B TOTAL E/B W/B TOTAL E/B W1B TOTAL 1 0100 72 29 101 59 25 84 85 35 120 56 15 71 2 0200 43 27 70 40 29 69 43 39 82 24 13 37 3 0300 41 30 71 25 25 50 35 25 60 27 21 48 4 0400 21 35 56 33 40 73 40 45 85 17 45 62 5 0500 44 128 172 45 109 1541 40 95 135 36 113 149 6 0600 84 338 422 88 328 416 75 290 365 96 404 500 7 0700 280 983 1,263 290 935 1,225 262 835 1,097 1 1,528 8 0800 376 1,545 1,921 403 1,488 11891 360 1,288 1,648 576t 2,017 2,543 9 0900 476 1 335 1,811 413 1,240 1,662 409 1,095 1,504 58 1, 2 2,080 10 1000 504 865 1,369 488 845 1,333 462 830 1,292 532 9271 1,459 11 1100 467 708 1,175 495 686 1,181 480 710 1,190 575 7241 1,299 12 1200 546 675 1,221 566 612 1,178 535 635 1,170 644 646 1,290 13 1300 674 587 1,261 645 645 1,290 630 644 1,274 808 642 1,450 14 1400 747 622 1,369 711 566 1,277 635 535 1,170 749 586 1,335 15 1500 822 579 1,401 755 575 1,330 745 546 1,291 806 660 1,466 16 1600 1,077 621 1,698 939 526 1,465 913 605 1,518 1,182 761 1,943 17 1700 1,297 632 1,929 1,220 655 1,875 1,243 465 1,708 li44 I 6 2,113 18 1800 1,517 558 2,075 1,522 590 2,112 1,367 533 1,900 1,649 6631 2,312 19 1900 1,056 508 1,564 959 495 1,454 826 419 1,245 1,585 20 2000 674 281 955 665 309 974 577 290 857 654 263 917 21 21CO 463 211 674 506 230 736 472 216 688 523 225 748 22 22C0 397 144 541 3661 1551 521 330 165 545 400 134 534 23 2300 207 103 310 245 100 345 240 95 335 244 80 324 24 2400 147 55 202 135 60 195 162 55 217 115 42 157 TOTAL 12,032 11,599 23,6311 11,613 11,277 22,8901 11,0161 10,490 21,506 13,1 31 12,8471 25,950 UTA i t: i r.3/2ul 9 DATE: E: b/2b/2019 NB Average 11,941 DATE: 7/3/2019 SB Average 11,553 Collier County Count Station 535 DATE: 11 /5/2019 Annual Daily Average Ave. Dally Volume 23,494 0 0 0 c m m 0 a m DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F 1 F89793F 1�- JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT METHODOLOGY REPORT For Temple Shalom PUD (Pine Ridge Road, Collier County, Florida) May 1, 2019 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Major Study) Review Fee—$I,500.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLOP-IDA 341 1 9 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO. 27830 {PROJECT No. 19021 2} JAME5 BANKS, P.E. DATE FLORIQ44rREE3. NO. 43BSEI Al DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date: 5-1-2019 Time: Location: Collier County Government Offices (North Horseshoe Drive) People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) James M. Banks, JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., 239-919-2767 2) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Government 3) 4) Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title: James M, Banks, P.E., President Organization: JMB Transportation Engineering,Inc. Address & Telephone Nwmber: 4711 7th Avenue SW Naples, Florida 34119 (239)-919- 2767 Reviewer(s)• Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer Collier County Transportation Division Applicant: Applicant's Name: Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: Temple Shalom PUD Location: South side of Pine Ridge Road and about 3/4 miles west of Collier Blvd Land Use Type: ITE Code #: LUC 565 and LUC 712 Proposed number of development units: Existing is Worship Hall and 70 student day care. Proposed is 200 student day care and 16.000 s.f. of administrative offices. Other: Description: Zoning: PUD Existing: Comprehensive plan recommendation: Requested: Findings of the Preliminary Study: See the attached C:lUse 5 James bI. Ban*0wk1opU1R0JECT91 GoffierGoontyW90212 Temple Shalaml te�hodofagyEepo ,obc NI Z DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F Study Type: Major Study Study Area: Boundaries: Based Based upon the County's 2%, 2% & 3% impact rule. See attached Additional intersections to be analyzed: None Horizon Year(s): 2022 Analysis Time Period(s): PM Peak Future Off Site Developments: None Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (`Fable 1) Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: Pass -by trips: Internal trips (PUD): Transmit use: Other: Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 2023 per Collier County's 5-year CIE. Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: See Attached Site -trip generation: See Table I Trip distribution method: Based upon manual assignment (See Table 2 & Figure 2) Traffic assignment method: Traffic growth rate: Per Collier County Historical & Current AUIR Reports, but not less than 2% or background or vested trips method, whichever is Greater. MsarslJames M. BsnksV]eskfopWR0JF0Y6V CoNsr CwtnM180212 Temple ShafumlMsVwdaWgyRepart.da: M3, DocuSign Envelope ID: 45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Sight distance: Queuing: Access location & configuration: Traffic control: Signal system location & progression needs: On -site parking needs: Data Sources: Base maps: Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: Review process: Requirements: Miscellaneous: Small Scale Study — No Fee Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1500.00 X Includes 2 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each None All fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. --------------- Reviewers Applicant C:lUsedAmesM.890SWesktopTR©JECTVColherCoufi4AY90292TempleShalom4�iethodologyi pad.eec M4 DocuSign Envelope ID:45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F I Vanderbilt Beach Rd I I I I I NORTH N.T.S. Z Iv Golden Gate Boulevard — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — a a o a ❑ M a>i w 0 0 D m o J 4Y 9 N CJ I }i I I Pine Ridge Road I White Boulevard 11 Eh Ave SW 13th Ave SW I 15th Ave SW I I Green Boulevard I I I I I N n I M I� I m a I I Golden Gate Parkway 0 I �----------� LEGEND o 6—LANE ARTERIAL n I 00� I 4—LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR — — — — — m I / I 2—LANE ARTERIAL o I / / i 2--LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD I ♦/ I JIM TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERINS, INC. Temple Shalom PUD Project Location & FIGURE 1 May 1, 2019 Roadway Classification /A S' DocuSign Envelope ID:45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Temple Shalom Land Use Code Land Use Description 565 Day Care Center 565 Day Care Center 712 Small Office Building Land Use Code Trip Period LUC 565 Existing Daily Traffic (ADT) - Existing AM Peak Hour (vph) _ Existing PM Peak Hour (vph) = Proposed Daily Traffic (ADT) = Proposed AM Peak Hour (vph) _ Proposed PM Peak Hour (vph) = Net New Daily Traffic (ADT) = Build Schedule 70 Existing Students 200 Proposed + Existing Students 16,000 s.f. Trip Generation Equation T= 3.56(X) + 47.23 = T= 0.65(X) + 8.42= 5311116 Enter/47% Exit = Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X)+0.29 = 47% Enter/53916 Exit = T= 3.56(X) -- 47.23 = T= 0. 66(X) + 8.42= 5396 Enter/47% Exit = Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X)+0.29 = 47% Enter/53% Exit = T= 3.56(X) + 47.23 = Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 296 ADT 55 vph 29 / 26 vph 54 vph 25 / 29 vph 759 ADT 140 vph 74 / 66 vph 134 vph 63 / 71 vph 463 ADT Net New AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.66(X) + 8.42= 86 vph 46 f 40 vph 53% Enter/ 47% Exit = Net New PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X)+0.29 = 80 vph 38 / 42 vph 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = LUC 712 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 16.19(X) = 259 ADT AM Peale Hour (vph) = T= 1.92(X) = 31 vph 25 / 5 vph 83% Enter/ 18% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 2.45(X) = 39 vph 13 / 27 vph 32% Enter/ 68% Exit = TOTALS Daily Traffic (ADT) = 722 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = 117 vph 71 / 46 vph PM Peak Hour (vph) = 120 vph 51 / 69 vph Nil DocuSign Envelope ID:45B2BA7E-3F7C-4467-AD87-602F1F89793F I I I b\ I0 2 I -o I IQ m � 6 � Q � O m L 3 0 0 q] b\ m � ID U 3�_ 55% ► 45% I Pine Ridge Rood G ---------�--------- I 1 1 th Ave SW I Ln I r 13th Ave SW 15th Ave SW I IGreen Boulevard 1 Vanderbilt Beach Rd NORTH N.T.S. 1► Golden Gate Boulevard ------------------- - 10%" r White Boulevard I j I I I p I I M I I c I I C I I I I Lo m I Golden Gate Parkway o I I LEGEND I /, i OH PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT I I // I J I JMB TRANsF-o RTATION ENGINEERING, INC. Temple Shalom PUD PROJECT -GENERATED FIGURE 2 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION May 1, 2019 (-4U 0 0 c Cn cQ 0 m 0 m TABLE 2 CD PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT co N co D V m Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 69 Exiting G, n Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) = 51 Entering V n 31.1 County Road 951 31.2 48.0 Logan Blvd 49.0 68.0 Pine Ridge Road 125.a 125.b .A Golden Gate Blvd to Pine Ridge Pine Ridge to Green Blvd Vanderbilt to Pine Ridge Rd Pine Ridge Rd to Green Blvd 1-75 to Logan Blvd Logan Blvd to Site Site to Collier Blvd rn V LOS Service Project Project PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project co 71 Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent M Significar T Class LOS v� phpd) % Dist. of phpd) Pk Dir (vph) DiR Standard Impact Impact n 6D D 3000 20.0% 14 N 10 S 0.46% NO co 6D D 3000 15.0% 10 S 8 N 0.35% NO w n 2U D 1000 5% 3 N 3 S 3% 0.35% NO 4D D 1900 15% 10 S 8 N 3% 0.54% NO 6D E 2800 35% 24 W 18 E 2% 0.86% NO 4D D 2400 55% 38 W 28 E 2% 1.58% NO 4D D 2400 45% 31 E 23 W 2% 1.29% NO 68.0 Pine Ridge Road 125.a 125.b 3 0 TABLE 3 2018 & 2022 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2022 2022 Peak Hour 2018 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips v( phpd) DiR AUIR v( phpo) v( php_d) v( phpd) I-75 to Logan Blvd 2190 E 2.00% 2371 1 2191 Logan Blvd to Site 1340 E 2.00% 1450 7 1347 Site to Collier Blvd 1340 E 2.00% 1450 7 1347 0 0 c Cn cQ 0 m 0 m 0 68.0 Pine Ridge Road 125.a 125. b 3 TABLE 4 2022 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMEXAPACITY ANALYSIS 2022 2022 2022 2018 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir (vphpd) LOS v( phpd) Dir LOS v h d Dir NO) Dir (vphpd) [Vphpd) 1-75 to Logan Blvd 2190 D 2371 E D 24 11V 18 E 2388 28DO Logan Blvd to Site 1340 D 1450 E D 38 IN 28 E 1479 2400 Site to Collier Blvd 1340 C 1450 E C 31 E 23 VV 1482 2400 0 0 c Cn cQ 0 m 0 m 0 CD 01 co N co D V m 2022 ca 2022 n Build -out Build-Ot Peak Hour Peak Ho PK Direction PK Directi of v!c Ratio LOS co 0.85 D o 0.62 C 0.62 C OD w n TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD PERMITTED USES A maximum of 22,000 square feet of civic, social and religious organization (non -sanctuary) uses shall be permitted on Tract 64, and a 302-seat sanctuary and related church/religious facilities and 200 student pre- school uses shall be permitted within the CFPUD on Tracts 65 and 68. The building area for Tracts 65 and 68 shall be a maximum of 50,000 square feet. The uses are subject to the trip cap identified in Exhibit F, Section 4.a of this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: COMMUNITY FACILITY A. Principal Uses: 1. Child day care/pre-school center (Tracts 65 and 68 only) (8351) 2. Civic, social and fraternal association (religious affiliated only) (8641) 3. Educational, religious or charitable trusts (6732) 4. Religious organizations, including churches, temples and other places of worship; (8661) religious instruction, religious philanthropic and religious organizations 5. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the BZA or the Hearing Examiner B. Accessory Uses: 1. Administrative offices 2. Indoor and outdoor recreational facilities including but not limited to fitness facilities, playgrounds, nature trails, and similar facilities. 3. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the permitted uses within this CFPUD document. 4. Water management facilities to serve the project such as lakes. 5. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos, plazas and picnic areas. 6. Any other accessory and related use that is determined to be comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this CFPUD, as determined by the BZA or the Hearing Examiner. PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A-F-rev3.docx February 26, 2020 Page 1 of 10 C. Prohibited Uses: 1. Soup kitchens 2. Homeless shelters 3. Offender rehabilitation agencies 4. Public welfare offices 5. Self-help organizations for alcoholics 6. Refugee services D. Operational Standards: 1. No outdoor amplified music shall be permitted between 8:00 p.m. and 9 a.m. 2. Child care hours of operation are 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday PRESERVE A. Allowable Uses: 1. Preserve. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Uses subject to LDC section Allowable Uses within County required preserves PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A-F-rev3.docx February 26, 2020 Page 2 of 10 EXHIBIT B TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Temple Shalom CFPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA N/A N/A AVERAGE LOT WIDTH N/A N/A MINIMUM YARDS (External) From Pine Ridge Road ROW 75 ft. 75 ft. From Western PUD Boundary 100 ft. 50 ft. From Eastern PUD Boundary 30 ft. 30 ft. From Southern PUD Boundary 75 ft. 50 ft. (1) From Preserves 25 ft. 10 ft. MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 20 ft. 10 ft. MAXIMUM HEIGHT Zoned 30 ft. 20 ft. Actual 40 ft. (2) 25 ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA N/A N/A MAXIMUM GROSS BUILDING AREA Tract 64 Tracts 65 and 68 22,000 sq. ft. 50,000 sq. ft. N/A NOTES: (1) Except 40 ft. for the tarpaulin/shade cover over the outdoor play area, as depicted on the master plan. (2) Not to exceed a maximum of 2 stories. PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A-F-rev3.docx February 26, 2020 Page 3 of 10 ® MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPED' LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE U HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE, EAST OF PRESERVE, TO EXTEND 100' SOUTH PINE RIDGE ROAD E, ESTATES RESIDENTIAL MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPE'D'® LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE PROPERTY (---------- ---- ---- I I 'PROPERTY BOUNDARY ° BOUNDARY o- MINIMUM 6' WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER .' 4 GRASS PARKING BUILDING I o AREA RESERVATION (SEE' �� `.'_'.`.`.'_ NOTE #2) �.I �� �����.�.� ' E, ESTATES d m- - GRASS O E, ESTATES m`p PARKING �I`�'_-0 RESIDENTIAL <:<. v o RESIDENTIAL �,------- ��'Ci o z . 0 BUILDING Zi . SS - - - - n MINIMUM 15' WIDE TYPE'B' MINIMUM 15' !" z AREA PARKING m I ®LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH WIDE TYPE'B' 6 HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE LANDSCAPE — I BUFFER WITH 6' D Y, GRASS HIGH CHAIN LINK m PARKING i PRE-SCHOOL - FENCE® D SE TIC SYSTEM SEPTIC SYSTEM 4 LEGEND . �. ° o°o°o° B DRIVEWAY/PARKING OUTDOOR TRACT 64I TRACT 65` PLAY AREA iTRACT 65I TRACT 68` lo BUILDING MINIMUM 15' WIDE TYPE'B' " SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH® 5 E, ESTATES U HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SDP-90-128 - TRACTS 65 & 68 - 0.8± ACRES) RESIDENTIAL 0 125'— 150, SCALE: 1,� - 150' 0 PRESERVE TRACT 64 - 0.66 ACRES AND PRESERVE PER SDP-90-128 TRACT 65 & 68 - 0.34 ACRES WHEN PLOTTED @8.5x11 scACR: a TEMPLE SHALOM CEPUD il. tiroJy Minor and Associates, P. k. DOB CODE 50 ® DEVIATION GradyMinor 3RR9 Via DnI Bey Bonne Bpringa. Florida 34134 EXHIBIT C DATE eN AY 2D1 Civil Engineers . Land Surveyors . Planners . Landscape Architects VASTER PLAN FIEE mn e9 Cert. oFAdh. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business Le 26000266 REVISED: 02/26/2020 - - - BonitaSprings: 239.947.1144 a Wa. GradyMinor. com Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 SHEET 1 OF 2 SITE SUMMARY TOTAL SITE AREA: 13.5± ACRE (AC) COMMUNITY FACILITY: 11.6± AC (86%) PRESERVE: 1.0± AC (7%) LANDSCAPE BUFFERS: 0.9± AC (7%) MAXIMUM BUILDING AREA: 22,000 S.F. (TRACT 64) 50,000 S.F. (TRACT 65 AND 68) OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED: 4.05± AC (13.5± AC X 0.30) PROVIDED: 4.05± AC PRF.qFR\/F• REQUIRED: 1.0 ACRES TRACT 65 AND 68: 0.34 ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION PER SDP-90-128 TRACT 64: 0.66 ACRES (4.43± ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION X 0.15) PROVIDED: 1.0 ACRES DEVIATIONS (SEE EXHIBIT E): 1�. GRASS PARKING (APPLIES TO ENTIRE PUD) 2❑ PARKING DISTRIBUTION (APPLIES TO ENTIRE PUD) 3❑ PRESERVE SETBACK FENCE 5❑ PRESERVE STANDARDS GRASS PARKING NCITFS 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 2. PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH 4.06.02 AND 4.06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. IN ORDER TO MEET 4 THE REQUIREMENTS OF A TYPE 'B' BUFFER ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF THE PUD, A 6—FOOT—WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED ON THE MASTER PLAN. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PRESERVE DOES NOT MEET BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND g SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING WITHIN THE PRESERVE, PLANTINGS WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE 6' WIDE RESERVATION TO MEET THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. THE TYPE, SIZE, AND NUMBER OF SUCH PLANTINGS, IF NECESSARY, WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF INITIAL SDP OR PLAT AND INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE SDP OR PLAT. LEGEND TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD © G ra dyMi n o r nl nor gnU 001viaies. r A JFS ea T' ;iKllll VIu Ucl Key cgn 1 Ruling sprinigi. F1orldg 34134 EXHIBIT C uATn: ® DEVIATION MASTER PLAN NOTES '""U"n`g2019 Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects — DUME: C,,r,f Aulh. F B00051u1 Cm.,fAuth. I,130006151 i,c 26000266 REVISED: 02/26/2020 - - - BonitnSprings: 239.947. 1144 nun. r"ro'4, lllnnl% r'i,m Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 SHEET 2 OF 2 EXHIBIT D TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT 64, LESS THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF; TRACT 65, LESS THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF; TRACT 68, LESS THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF; GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 26, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 15 AND 16, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A-F-rev3.docx February 26, 2020 Page 6 of 10 C:/:II711i4 TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC DEVIATION 1: From LDC Section 4.05.02.B.1.a.iv., Off Street Parking and Loading, Design Standards, which reads as follows: "Parking lots in excess of 200 parking spaces may surface 15 percent of the required off- street parking spaces in grass. Such grass parking spaces shall be located along the outlying perimeter of the parking lot." Notwithstanding the LDC provision above, this CFPUD may surface up to 70 percent of the required off-street parking spaces in grass/lawn, and the grass/lawn spaces may be located in the areas labelled "grass parking" on the master plan. DEVIATION 2: From LDC Section 5.05.08 F.2.b.ii.a), Interior lots, which requires no more than 80 percent of the off- street parking for the entire commercial building or project shall be located between any primary fagade of the commercial building or project and the abutting street or navigable waterway, to instead allow 100 percent of the off- street parking for the entire project to be located between the primary fagade of the commercial building and the abutting street. DEVIATION 3: From LDC Section 3.05.07 H.3.a., preserve standards, which requires accessory structures and all other site alterations shall have a minimum 10-foot setback from the boundary of any preserve to instead allow a zero foot setback from parking areas located adjacent to the existing preserve from SDP-90-128. DEVIATION 4: From LDC Section 5.03.02.G.1.a. and b.i., Supplemental Standards, which states that chain link (including wire mesh) and wood fences are prohibited forward of the primary facade and shall be a minimum of 100 feet from a public right-of-way. If these types of fences face a public or private street then they shall be screened with an irrigated hedge planted directly in front of the fence on the street side. Plant material shall be a minimum of 3 gallons in size and planted no more than 3 feet on center at time of installation. This plant material must be maintained at no less than three-quarters of the height of the adjacent fence and that fences shall not exceed 4 feet in height, to instead allow installation of a 6' high chain link fence forward of the primary building facade to within 100' of the Pine Ridge Road ROW. Where chain link fencing is provided, a hedge or landscape buffer shall be provided on the external side of the chain link fence consistent with the requirements of Section 5.03.02.G.1.a. and b.i. The location of the chain link fencing and proposed decorative aluminum fencing is depicted on Exhibit C, Master Plan. DEVIATION 5: From LDC Section 3.05.07.A.5., preserve standards, which requires preservation areas shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, to instead allow the existing Oak Hammock area as a standalone preserve. PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A-F-rev3.docx February 26, 2020 Page 7 of 10 DEVIATION 6: From LDC Section 4.05.02.B.1.a.iii, Off Street Parking and Loading, Design Standards, which requires Up to 70 percent of the parking spaces for houses of worship and schools may be surfaced with grass or lawn, when the County Manager or designee determines that the paving of some or all parking spaces for houses of worship and schools will have significant negative environmental impacts to instead allow community facility uses within the PUD to also provide up to 70% of any parking to be surfaced with grass. PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A-F-rev3.docx February 26, 2020 Page 8 of 10 *:I:II:1112: TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS all11 AAIIQ011to] NI►[e1 One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Temple Shalom, Inc., 4630 Pine Ridge Road, Naples FL 34119. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. MISCELLANEOUS a. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. (Section 125.022, FS) b. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL a. Approximately 0.34± acres of native vegetation was retained as part of the initial property development (Tracts 65 and 68). The 0.34± acres shall be deemed to meet the native vegetation requirements for tract 65 and 68. For the undeveloped Tract 64 (4.43± acres) area of the property, a minimum of 15% or 0.66± acres (4.43 acres x .15) of the existing native vegetation shall be retained on site. A total of 1.0 acres of native vegetation shall be retained on site (0.34 acres + 0.66 acres). b. A management plan for Florida black bear shall be submitted for review and approval at time of final plat or SDP for the project, whichever is applicable. PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A-F-rev3.docx February 26, 2020 Page 9 of 10 4. TRANSPORTATION a. The CFPUD shall be limited to a maximum of 237 weekday p.m. peak hour two-way trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. b. For religious holiday services and other scheduled events where greater than 400 attendees are anticipated, the property owner or event host shall provide traffic control at project entrances and exits by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider, with staffing and locations as directed by the County Manager or his designee. 5. LANDSCAPING a. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. In order to meet the requirements of a Type 'B' buffer along the western boundary of the PUD, a 6-foot-wide landscape buffer reservation has been identified on the master plan. In the event that the preserve does not meet buffer requirements after removal of exotics and supplemental planting within the preserve, plantings will be provided in the 6' wide reservation to meet the buffer requirements. The type, size, and number of such plantings, if necessary, will be determined at time of initial SDP or plat and included on the landscape plans for the SDP or plat. PL20180003710 Temple Shalom CFPUD Exhibits A-F-rev3.docx February 26, 2020 Page 10 of 10 Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) (PL20180003710) Deviation Justification 1. Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.02.B.1.a.iv., Off Street Parking and Loading, which reads as follows: "Parking lots in excess of 200 parking spaces may surface 15 percent of the required off- street parking spaces in grass. Such grass parking spaces shall be located along the outlying perimeter of the parking lot." Notwithstanding the LDC provision above, this CFPUD may surface up to 70 percent of the required off-street parking spaces in grass/lawn, and the grass/lawn spaces may be located in the areas labelled "grass parking" on the master plan. Justification: Churches and school uses are permitted to utilize stabilized grass parking for up to 70% of their required parking. All uses proposed on the site are religious or school affiliated and will share parking throughout the site. The provided paved parking provides more than adequate parking for daily use needs for all facilities within the PUD. The grassed parking areas will primarily be utilized during hours for religious services or events. 2. Deviation 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.08 F.2.b.ii.a), Interior lots, which requires no more than 80 percent of the off- street parking for the entire commercial building or project shall be located between any primary fagade of the commercial building or project and the abutting street or navigable waterway, to instead allow 100 percent of the off- street parking for the entire project to be located between the primary fagade of the commercial building and the abutting street. Justification: Due to the project being an expansion of an existing facility, the site contains location restrictions in terms of location of ingress / egress, surface water management, and preserve areas. Furthermore, in an effort to appease the abutting western neighbor, the applicant has strategically placed the required buffer in an effort to maximize the western buffer. The neighbor also expressed concern of the location of the septic tank and drain field in relation to the neighbors onsite potable water well. As a result, the septic tank and drain field has been place at the furthest location possible from the neighbors well. 3. Deviation 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07 H.3.a., preserve standards, which requires accessory structures and all other site alterations shall have a minimum 10-foot setback from the boundary of any preserve to instead allow a zero foot setback from parking areas located adjacent to the existing preserve from SDP-90-128. February 26, 2020 M GradyMinor Page 1 of 3 JFGNA-18 Deviation Justification-rev3.docx cis ii Engineers • Land Svrvcyors • P1anncrs • I,andscapc Archltccts Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) (PL20180003710) Deviation Justification Justification: The original site improvements were installed prior to the County's requirement to have native vegetation preservation for non-residential development. The existing Oak Hammock preserve area has parking and walkways within 10 feet of the preserve area. The deviation will allow the preserve area and the nearby parking and walkways to continue to function as presently configured. 4. Deviation 4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.G.1.a. and b.i., Supplemental Standards, which states that chain link (including wire mesh) and wood fences are prohibited forward of the primary fagade and shall be a minimum of 100 feet from a public right-of-way. If these types of fences face a public or private street then they shall be screened with an irrigated hedge planted directly in front of the fence on the street side. Plant material shall be a minimum of 3 gallons in size and planted no more than 3 feet on center at time of installation. This plant material must be maintained at no less than three- quarters of the height of the adjacent fence and that fences shall not exceed 4 feet in height, to instead allow installation of a 6' high chain link fence forward of the primary building fagade to within 100' of the Pine Ridge Road ROW. Where chain link fencing is provided, a hedge or landscape buffer shall be provided on the external side of the chain link fence consistent with the requirements of Section 5.03.02.G.1.a. and b.i. The location of the chain link fencing and proposed decorative aluminum fencing is depicted on Exhibit C, Master Plan. Justification: The Temple has been conducting on -going security assessments as have other faith -based organizations and has determined that a 6' high fence around the perimeter of the PUD is a necessary security measure. The security fencing will be a combination of 6' high decorative wall/fence along Pine Ridge Road, which would extend south 100 linear feet near the east and west property lines, and then a 6' high chain link fence may be provided for the remainder of the east, west and south property lines. As with schools, churches have been the subject of threats and attacks. While a 6' high fence is not impenetrable, it will provide for deterrence and some level of security. The proposed use of chain link fencing forward of the fagade will not create a negative visual for motorists using Pine Ridge Road as it will be setback 100' from the ROW and will be obscured by a hedge and landscape material. The size of the site (13.5± acres) makes it infeasible to provide decorative fencing where building placement has purposely been located greater than 100' from the property line. Deviation 5 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07.A.5., preserve standards, which requires preservation areas shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, to instead allow the existing Oak Hammock area as a standalone preserve. February 26, 2020 W GradyMinor Page 2 of 3 JFGNA-18 Deviation Justification-rev3.docx cis ii xngfneers • Land Svrvcyors • P1anncrs • I,andscapc Archltccts Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) (PL20180003710) Deviation Justification Justification: The previously approved conditional use for Tracts 65 and 68 did not include Tract 64. The property was developed around the existing Oak Hammock Preserve with the approval of SDP 90-128, which does not allow for interconnection to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors on adjacent parcels or Tract 64. The preserve area on Tract 64 does interconnect to adjoining off -site open space areas and it will serve as a buffer to the immediate neighbor to the west. 6. Deviation 6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.02.B.1.a.iii, Off Street Parking and Loading, Design Standards, which requires Up to 70 percent of the parking spaces for houses of worship and schools may be surfaced with grass or lawn, when the County Manager or designee determines that the paving of some or all parking spaces for houses of worship and schools will have significant negative environmental impacts to instead allow community facility uses within the PUD to also provide up to 70% of any parking to be surfaced with grass. Justification: Parking for uses within the CFPUD will be shared. While worship services are not permitted on Tract 64, all property and buildings will be owned by Temple Shalom. All parking is not anticipated to be needed on a daily basis; therefore, it makes sense to permit parking to be surfaced with stabilized grass surface as permitted for churches and schools. February 26, 2020 W GradyMinor Page 3 of 3 JFGNA-18 Deviation Justification-rev3.docx cis ii xngfneers • band Svrvcyors • PIanncrs • I,andscapc Archltccts Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com JULY 27, 1993 RESOLUTION 93-_ZU A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CHILD CARE CENTER CONDITIONAL USE IN THE "E" ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.2.3.3.3 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of Conditional Use 2.2.3.3.3 in an "E" Estates zone for a child care center on the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A") that satisfactory provision and Arrangement has been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 2.7.4.4 of the Land Development Code for the Collier County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida that: -11- Annv ni! n 1,,,, 9n7 JULY 27, 1993 The petition filed by Nancy Ross of Temple Shalom, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Tracts 65 & 68, Golden Gate Estates Unit 26, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 7, Pages 15 and 16, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. be and the same is hereby approved for Conditional Use 2.2.3.3.3 of the "E" Estates zoning district for a child care center in accordance with the Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit "B") and subject to the following conditions:. Exhibit "C" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board..., Commissioner Volpe offered the foregoing Resolution and moved for its adoption, seconded by Commissioner Constantine and upon roll call, the vote was: AYES: Commissioner Volpe, Commissioner Constantine, Commissioner Norris, Commissioner Matthews, and Commissioner Saunders NAYS: ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: ABSTENTION: Done this 27th day of July , 1993. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: �-xll� BURT L. SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAN ATf EST : I''wIGHT E. BROCIC.' . CLERK iN W :l OUF , _AS TO' • FORM AND # UVT1,CIENCY: MmucaZE M. S DENT ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY CU-93-6 RESOLUTION nb/968o WK Goo PW, 298 -2- JULY 27, 1993 FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER.COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CET-93-6 The following facts. are found: 1. section 2 of the Land Devlopment Code author zed the cond tiona1 use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes �/ No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed .structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingres �� egress Yes- No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to nois$; glare, economic or odor effects: V No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the d�ptrict: Compatible us within district Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy at ched) (should not) be recommended for approval DATE: CRAI FINDING OF FACT CHAIRMAN/md EXHIBIT "A" BOCK GOO FAQ., ?go JULY 27, 1993 ------------- I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I > I I I I I I I I r I I .. � i I 1 •�I I ti l M7Tm=rm rrrrrrrrTF-1111�1 Lj II E nw �; n IN'9 cac�I� R I I I I I fD Q I• :� � .� z ---______ —__ -----� Ij' it I I,I :a yw o 7 o] i w UM PM=MUWff « FBUTLER basm, L'MtigFf ongon(bovang, Inc. ^.... «� rani. srrc Z)rVrWPME" Puri EXHIBIT "B" WK 000 FA ,' 300 JULY 27, 1993 I, Nancy. Ross, authorized agent for Petition CU-93-6, agree to the following stipulations requested by the Collier County Planning Commission in,their public hearing on July 1, 1993. Planning Services:, a. The Current Planning Manager, may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by the conditional use. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use application, 'or major changes to the site plan submitted as part of this application, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development Plan Review and approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance (91-102). b. The proposed child care center shall operate Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., and enrollment shall not exceed 70 children. PETITIONV 0� GENT State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Agreement Sheet was acknowledged before me this day of Te � , 1993 by ,(jA NCI -). K u 5r - , who s personally known Vo me or who has producedF L. 6 30- S-J -h 37 as identification and who did (did not) take aann oath. e; �� . 4e-7"e� OFFICIAL ( gnature of Notary Public) NOT-AA NORMA A BOOKIE NOTARY PLMLIC STATE OF F, C0WMION NO. CC2; My COMMISSION FXp. AUG. 27,17r5 NOTARY PUBLIC Commission # (' My Commission Expires: ply q EXHIBIT "C" -1- BOOK 000 FAu I JULY 27, 1993 _ 7 REPRESENTATIVE FOR CCPC State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Aqe ent Sheet was acknowledged before me this - day of .Jw O 1993 by F-- -A who is personally known to me o as iA-nLLf4,oa*-i-en and wh-o i (did not) take an oath. c (S nature of Notary Public) NORMA A NOONE NOTARY MSUC STATE OF FLORM COMMOSiON NO. CC215M MY COMMISSION M. AUG. ZLI996 CU-93-6 AGREEMENT SHEET/md NOTARY PUBLIC Commission I C'Gi.S9T'` My Commission Expires: �,.�� e00K OGO FA 302 -2- 0 PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 S, RANGE 26 E LEGEND BACK of VALLEY GUTTER B VG BACK of CURB BC EDGE of PAVEMENT EP NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM NGVD FLOWLI N E FL INVERT INV ELEVATION EL POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE PVC DUCTILE IRON PIPE DIP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RCP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CMP Al R VALVE F--O GATE VALVE G BUTTERFLY VALVE PLUG VALVE P-- MAIN ENDING BLOW OFF FIRE HYDRANT+ MANHOLE INLET HEADWALL MITERED END CLEAN OU T FLOW DIRECTION CENTERLINE RIGHT—OF—WAY 6 VINEYARDS 3 to 2 t 5 4 0) UNIT 7 UNIT 85 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 8 fN VINEYARDS 10 i t 12 7 8 9 UNIT 32 UNIT 1 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 8 PINE RIDGE RD. WHITE BLVD. 17 16 15 R U 0 ( t3 t8 UNIT 33 UNIT 34 UNIT 26 UNIT 15 UNIT 194 UNIT 27 24 20 21 22 UNIT 31 GOLDEN GATE UNIT 195 GATE VILLAS J m Cl N UNIT 28 UNIT 9 Q 27 26 25 2930 m I Z Q N LOCATION MAP pG��p °L[��D I�OOG�o I�La�ID pf�OOC�C�G���i]E[�`� I��Do C/0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP. * 1100 5th AVE. So. * NAPLES, FL 33940 * (813) 649-1952 pG��pQ[��D o�� oC��I��G� 1645 COLONIAL BLVD. * FT. MYERS, FL 33907 * (813) 566-3636 INDEX TITLE SHEET SITE PLAN SHEET 1 SHEET 2 # DATE REVISION BY �� 41 r MAY "9 0 -1 2g t sr P9-- /.2 e' APPPOVE-D f 731l. '7 ' BTIPLJ -1 zA THEAPPI;'10 i mot) BY: - PLANNING SEPVI% CES SEGTICA 0 rn �0 N 0� 0 Q.. U .. LiJ LJ I- O Qry 0n MAY s i9wL v J Eyk'OYV g Y. .a S • F t %s 1`. i FINAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 S, RANGE 26 E LEGEND n BACK of VALLEY GUTTER BVG s BACK of CURB BC EDGE of PAVEMENT EP NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM NGVD FLOWLI N E FL INVERT INV ..' .:. ELEVATION EL y POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE PVC Y DUCTILE IRON PIPE DIP k REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RCP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CMP '. AIR VALVE GATE 'VALVE av _ BUTTERFLY VALVE x : PLUG VALVE Pv—..-- MAIN ENDING —+ BLOW OFF J_ FIRE HYDRANT ---+ . MANHOLE INLET I { x HEADWALL --� MITERED END CLEAN OU T --� FLOW DIRECTION CENTERLINE r RIGHT—OF—WAY — — V@EYARDS 5 4 3 u') 2 0) 1 E UNR 7 UNIT 96 UNIT 2 UNR 3 L*u o ------------- V VREYARDS a a UNIT 32 ID UNR 1 11 UNR 4 12 U?4T 5 7 UNR o PINE ROM RD. WHITE BLVD. 17 to 13� t3 10 UNIT 33 UNIT 34 UN T 2! UNIT 13 UNIT 104 UMTV ilmemw 24 20 21 22 23 UNIT 31 GOLDEN GATE UMT 103 . GATE H11AS CITY LOU 20 UNR 30 29 27 26 23 m LOCA11 ON MAP LAHO 1PR0C"R1EH.1EH7 LTDo C/0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP. * 1100 5th AVE. So. * NAPLES, FL 33940 * (813) 649-1952 B �s o 1645 COLONIAL BLVD. * FT. MYERS, FL 33907 * (813) 566-3636 INDEX TITLE SHEET SITE PLAN DETAIL SHEET SHEET 1 SHEET 2 SHEET 3 # DATE REVISION BY [;ZAic 1 a/(0/90 PE)r 2 61249v Pe ierCa0nt sz.A {ZQ k 5c t:c Fire rye{ecf soh, 6. Ria6le Vieff 4 l a 22 j90 Add &d `( e "P",eo, 6; e Fr-.04 51J 9h 4.5 (2/3 90 Kev�sed �;cS s �v►, fir- u.i�•S. t-AYl Co. 2 115 / 91 pzLfx,4 7E70 /'A,_.� PER CoLw-r l • )" K %. 4 I1091 ADDED SIH! - REVrsca Pex CLu'JTV Mt_ 8 Cmo;"A55 PA9X,^-<> To PAVED NFL 9. I q 91 KEv. . Pee, COO..' Com'MF-Nn M L 10 1019/91 PAVT• PLOADIQ(, SPi►(.FS, DRWeWA-j CuL%kqLy TN i l 4Iftl95 A DOFD STORAGE AREAS + OFF►c C APPr ;e -j vi 0 r� 'k03 to Y t 3... ;i may-. Y L ski -^ma's < y ji �.t '... 0I_k VED 31995 y f t� ftA1vN11yG 'R Vtft k,t } 0 4 o) ,r rn w O 0 Lrnrn `f �- 0 0r y : r 1 F— ! w Lv �r 0a_d �h 1 1 1 1 i 1 GENERAL REQUIRD4ENTS FOR PROPOSED 2' POTABLE WATER WELL AND ?REATUENT SYSTEM 1. 6' x 6' x 4' CONCRETE SLAB ON WELL HEAD © 2 PRESSURE GUAGE LOCATED ON SYSTEM Ai7ER 7REA7UENT IWTH A MINIMUM READING OF 20 pal 1 A DOWNWARD POINTING SPIGOT LOCATED ON SYSTEM PRIOR TO TREA7MENT * N17RA7F TEST IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO H.R.S FINAL APPROVAL * TWO CONSECU77VE BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS ARE REQUIRED PRIOOT TO H.R.S FINAL APPROVAL x ENVIRONMENTAL NOTE n t� THE HAMMOCK AREA SHALL REMAIN IN IT'S NATURAL STATE EXCEPT FOR A CLEARED STRIP, NOT TO EXCEED 8' IN WIDTH, TO ACCOMMODATE A 5' PATH. W i/7E BOULEVARD (PINE RIDGE ROAD) `e7 - - ,be ---»- -x Exlsting Pavement . !NV 11.10 �0 210' TAPER 100' STORAGE LANE -yc ©12' M-ESA INN i0.50 CONTROL STRUCTURE D (SEE SHEET 3) ®� `o ,o _ .. ... ... • • ... ... ... ... x. ,� ... ..•.. ... s ea-4o�d' E >�waaav ... .. ... ... • ....,�.,�.- ... • :. .. . 14 LF 12' CUP 3•?e` 2. INL 2 ET 77 LF 18' R-C.P. ZQ N: 981.39 O 0.0x j E: 713.92 m GRATE EL 11.30 • IH�ROA � � is�Q80 fivFIRE DEPT. • 12' DR 4FT FIRE CONNECTION a rVT7�ER5 - tze tea � ice T-T-1 F a ll h P • a a7 3. E MODIFIED MEDIAN CROSSING (SEE SHT- 3/3 FOR DETAIL) 7 75' STORAGE LANE 210' TAPER Exist. Medlan Crossing r r 3 E MATCH EXIST. EDGE OF PAVT_ STOP SIGN O SOLID WHITE BAR 4.t M.E.S. t0 VO .) INV 11.00 a� 43) • • i REFERENCE CARONNA7E - • N: 1000.00 14' 10 14' 100 S.F. SIGN E: 1000.00 i t I • I a 3.7 I . ,Q SE 77C TANK 'A' I hcF 75 GA 2 oa = �.5 I • IR IP a• .Em nw! .. S17C TANK CRITERIA a A t 7 WET `WE'LL "A � . 1!0 LF (504 BASIS 298 SEATS O 3 GPD/SEAT = 894 GPD N 8 3. tae 3' DIA. © , y ,, 2 PVC WATTER SERNCE 40 ) APPUCATIGIN RATE = 0.6 GPD/SF GRATE EL 1.,13. f0 y i y rw,r-IT�1 tie tae 4 / 0 SERNCE COWDU/T I -P DRA/NREW = 89410.6 = 1490 SF (DOSING REQUIRED) V (N'T a ® , DING SPACES 3� 2WPO7ABLE LL W/ PUMP & REPLACE7�IENT AREA 3 • 1490 = 4470 SF' a TREATMENT SYS7E7N DUMPSTER !, I lrI ESTIMATED FLOW FOR TANK 'A' = 248 GPD LOCATION Z - 12' A. FENCED �-�% A �;� WEZL� I 750 GAL TANK ` INVERT TANK 'A' = 11.5 © �•y` 1.Ix �CLOSIJRE 41 CHAIM LIN ENCE ti 4' IRJWGA77ON ESTIMATED FLOW FOR TANK 646 GPD x 3' .LB. • . N: 814,57 PROP, i �• NGAT 1200 GAL TANK 3• t 6 �' Z E: 759.36 INLET 16 INVERT TANK 'B' = 10.9 B t2e S>"oeA4 \ I RIM EL = 4.00 � + • N: 756.35 B s INLET �'`� s NV_ = 9.50 8' A.D.S E. 924.19 I I 6pr 8 I P� . W I O � C I ,,.., �.. •.-------fir_ - _,.��,_,_..a _.,_„�.,_-,-..._ __ _ - 3 12" REDUCING I 12" FLANGED 90' 800 FLANGE STANDARD 5 1/4' 12' INSTA FLANGLe THREAD FIRE NOZZLE IADAPM? ' ( 30' BLDG, SE7BACK • F F N: 761.82 E: 65Z69 GRATE EL = 11.80 WV = 0.00 (NE) Q TYPE b' CURB Now SPOT Lap., x� MEANDERING WALKWAY AROUND EXIST. VEGETA 77ON IItD7E J "04 YW CONSERVAMIN t.ASDAENT SHALL BE RELOCATIM AS NEEDED 7V PR07ECT 007M bEGiFTA 11Gf1 VAn� EA��1T__,__i CONSER r SS ALL 1HR£AD ROQS .t - INLET (4 REOb) h 12e N: 630.43 I E 650.43 • GRA 7E EL = 11.80 f5 BARS t20 3. ` � 111 12.1 T5 BARS t e x t� i . roll G� LF 0 2 tae 12" DRAFT FIRE WELL ,2e _ Qvti RAMP up N COUNTY t STATE --}- �t 12e --- Existing Rood Easement -- h -------•-----`-: ..•- -.-- ..• O.R. Sk 244. Pg 953 ►" .. .. .. .. N p- SOD . . L) I 1 4m -TYPE "D ROOF LEADER GRATF EL - 11.80 CURB IN = 9.00 (E) N utucr EaP. PROPOSED TEMPLE LF 15' ft. r-p' M/N. F.F. = 15� © • aoX I . 4' A D.S ?' PVC DISCHARGEQ' A•QS INLET FROM WELL 'A • I ROOD LEAOOt ( g N a WELL T' © I 4' SERNCE CONOCII - v BL 679.61 EY \ I E 775.40 4 RIM EL = 14.70 6" A.D.S !NV = 9.50 OFFICE L STORAGE CONC: WALK R*0M ADO Vrld ! 12' A.D.S ROOF LEADER I ls L3•;:I III: l90 S.P 3TQgAbfD 4, WLET,14 0' N- 630.45 E 711.85 I 4. ORA 7E EL = 1110 -.. INV = 9. N,W,$AWE) 4' SERVICE CLINOUT -� NOTE © I 1200 GA P. V G MAY BE USED o INV. = 10.9 I FOR ROOF LEADERS IN UEU OF A.D.S PIPE J I • WET WELL T I 4' DIA. I I. I fl�l T � C 6� I I ce 2' PVC DISCHARGE G� t k TheTO DRAINFIELD P- 100' BUILDING SE zz, (PER PU-89-0I t ES° 1490 SF. e - J I• SOIL PROFILE LOCA77ON 12 4470 SF. 1 REPLACEMENT AREA I .. 3 B INLET N: 436.80 E: 710.77 GRATE EL = 11.30 THROAT EL_ 1Q-80 INV. - 9.00 (N) E. 978.44 GRATE EL = 11.30 THROAT EL 1Q80 INV. = 9.00 (E) �G v r pp 3o OD Or--n t:7 00 � YYYYY�X mwcrwxcrcr2 ZH7 3 w C9 N 'Cat t _Z Cat M _ CID ia0 XL F- 1.- O y2V a r 50m 0 " LJQ W U Q E Z Z tY O tJ U to Wa- cD�W O Z .ii d' � Q ; o w 'Q JAW (?� O P ULA_tl-s < 0: 111 La a `❑ ❑ QW� NIj-F Be 0 SLAJ aLLJa oa'�0 000c«-o ❑ °D ad a; o cif° Y �cvr7•r�mm� a•o_ N v 0 m a 0 a 1.0 ., Plot so : d \tempm\ =��7E MI TERED END DIMENSIONS D A B C E F G M N 15" 2.27' 4.09, 6.36' 4.03' 8' 1.22' 4.63' 1.19, 18" 2.36' 5.12' 7.48' 5.03' 9' 1.41' 4.92' 1.21' 24" 2.53' 7.18' 9.71' 7.03' 11' 1.73' 5.50' 1.25' 30" 2.70' 9.25' 11.95' 9.03' 13' 2.00' 6.08, 1.29' 4: 1 SLOPE A C B �0.50 2 NO 4 BAR I LIMIT OF PAY ITEM MATCH EXIST. GRADE WHEEL STOP MI TERED END N7S 5' 1_ 18' GREEN AREA 24' DRIVE PARKING E.O. -' SLOPE O 1% PE O 2X 12' STABILIZED SUBGRADE (LBR 40) SECTION "A' - "A " N7S R=1.5' CONCRETE SLAB 3' ]NICK, REINFORCED WITH WW 6X6 — WI.4xW1.4 TD LIMITS OF SODDING SOLID WHITE LINE WHITE BOULEVARD (PINE RIDGE ROAD) Weetbound Lanes 75, STORAGE ' 2 R. MATCH EXIST. EDGE IPA VT. SLOPE Exist. Grass Median — �. ��^ TYPE A" CURB — — Exist. Median. CrossingMEDIAN r ': �y Eastbound Lanes DASHED WHITE LINE SOLID WHITE LINE STOP SIGN & SOLID WHl7E B \ / TYPE A" CURB .� 210' TAPER AR 100' STORAGE LANE 3 60' TYP"S _ o \^ x \°� ... ... O 30' ... �`!�—� . PROPOSED SWALEr s R/W M.E.S. INV 11.00 M.E.S. 47 LF 18" R.C.P. TYPE 'A' CURB /NV. 11.00 R VAR/ES 6.4' 5' BERM EL. = 13.5 MATCH EXIST. GRADE MATCH EXIST. GRADE EL. 12.3.f • 1 3 � 1• BOTTOM �- EL. = 11.0 WET SEASON — A R EL. = 9.5 SECTION "B "- "B" NTS O 0.0% 18' GREEN AREA 24' DRIVE 18' GREEN AREA PARKING (SODDED) PARKING (SODDED) 18" SLOPE = 2.00% OR AS SHOWN WHEEL STOP TYP SLOPE = 1.00% �� OR AS SHOWN :7kI \- 12' STABILIZED SUBGRADE (LBR 40) 1' TYPE S-3 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE 6' LIMEROCK BASE (PRIMED) 12' STABILIZED SUBGRADE (LBR 40) SECTION "C-C" NIS PROP. 12' LEFT TURN STORAGE LANE 14' PAVEMENT 10' ISLAND 14' PAVEMENT WEST BOUND EXIST MEDIAN EAST BOUND LANES LANES 1" TYPE S-3 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE MATCH EXIST. PA VT. CUB A AND SLOPE 6" LIMEROCK BASE (PRIMED)Amp EXIST. GRADE —�f TYPE A CURB 12" STABILIZED SUBGRADE (LBR 40) 1 /4" PER F00 CROSS SLOPE 6" " I SLOPE TO MATCH c EXIST. GRADE MATCH EXIST. ASPHALT 11:111 FEZ 10 LIMEROCK 12' STABILIZED BASE NUMBER 4 BARS O 8 ENTRANCE SECTION NTS VAR/E \ 3" M. IN S NOTE. THROAT ON STRUCTURE NUMBERS 1, 5, AND 7 ONL Y. USF 4122 GRA 8" 3'-10" 8" 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I o00 2'-6 0 0 0 o00 FIIIO O O O O O GRATED INLET N7S FRAME OR EQUAL 4" HANDICAPPED SIGN ^ , An !•.TAfI PARKING SPACES NTS N7S 210' TAPER DASHED WHITE LINE FLARED CURB END PE FOOT INDEX A300 GENERAL NOTES.• 1. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUC7ION SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS SPEC/F/CATION SECTION 570. 2. TRAFFIC STRIPING AND OTHER MARKING SHALL COMPLY WITH FDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION SECTION 711 AND TRAFFF/C OPERATION STANDARDS INDEX f l 7346. J. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH FLORIDA MANUAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SAFE PRACTICES OF HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE, AND U77LI7Y OPERATIONS, AND WITH 774E "MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES". • ii �•iii� r - L W� •• El R/W PINE RIDGE ROAD Z Ct PROP. 12 DECEL. Q O STORAGE LANE �--� � � a WEST BOUND EXIST. MEDIAN EAST BOUND I vUi LANES I LANES W MATCH EXIST. PAVT. AND- SLOPE 6 6' SHOULDER 6.OX W � I / tl / Q J N � N MATCH EXIST. ASPHALT EXIST. GRADE / 10' LIMEROCK 12" STABILIZED BASE EXIST. SWALE o SECTION "D-D " N. T.S. Exist. Swa/e —� "A R/W -o TOP OF BAN(C 13.5 15' �o Q Ift tn V UTFALL STAB. OVERFLOW O 13.2 •a t1� �� " TYPE D CURB S TRUC ruRE (SODDED) i SECTION E-E 2' 2' � SUMP A T 4" N. T S. m' TYP. L'I-e-Amp E - OUTFALL�'� BOT. EL 11.0 C0 SUMP BOTTOM F '� EL. = 10.3 (SODDED) �+ PAVEMENT 7RANS177CWN TO /NLE7- PAVEMENT ELEVA77ON "B" TYPICAL DROP CURB PLAN VIEW °° t AT SIDEWALK Nis TOP OF BERM DISCHARG P/PE O EL 13.5 STAB. OVERFLOW O 13.2 INVERT EL. IO.S (SODDED) GeATF E[. /3.2 TOB El. 13.5 STABALIZED OVERFLOW ® O EL. 13.2 p 9" T BAFFLE - Bor. EL. � 1 I(k /2"MES 4" DIA. OR/f7CE �• \ INV. 11.2 B�+FFi E l 5EE NF77� A 80 VF) w n SLOPE O A I lkv 0(' - � © 80T. EL 11.0 RE7EN710N AREA BOT. O EL. 11.0 k— 51umiP EL , SLOPE • 27 » EXIST. SWALE INVERT ,� SECTION » B - B SEC 7•TON A - A TYPE "A " CURB I Q NTS OU TFALL STRUCTURE _ 0 0 N75 n �-1 ,_J3 UTLE R bobah'. engineering, inc. 9 7 April 28, 1995 Ms. Sherry Long Collier County Project Review Services 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Fl 33942�.; RE: TEMPLE SHALOM - SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE SDP #90-128 Dear Sherry: In accordance with a recent pre -application meeting with Bryan Milk, the following items are submitted for a substantial change SDP modification of the above referenced project: • Ten (10) sets of revised drawings, signed and sealed. • Floor plan on 8 1/2 x 11 showing area to be revised. • Check #7951 in the amount of $250. The change is for storage additions and a 350± S.F. office addition. As the area added is insubstantial, no affects to the drainage, environmental, or parking requirements are anticipated. If you should have any questions, please call. Sincerely, BUTLER ENGINEERING, INC. I lay restendorf 109-02.30 cc: Rick Penza, Fleischman Garcia Architects 1645 COLONIAL BLVD. • FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33907 TELEPHONE 275-0660 (FORT MYERS) • 566-3636 (NAPLES) FAX # 275-6608 F i — , f "o PROJECT: �s SUPPLEMENTAL DRAWING NO; ' DATE__ F1cischmmaGlawcia Axctirrr-cTUIM - rLANNINO - 11VIIHIRIOR DESIGN 324 %CKI H KYDE PARK ANT..NUr. • WJM. SW - TAMPA. 14-01UDA 3,VA6 - l=rHoNE 813 2514400 —_ PRELIMINARY FINA BITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AM13"HENT APPLICATION (CIRCLE ONE) r COORDINATING PLANNER:•���- SDP#: L` SDP NAME; PROJECT CONTACT: AGENT —54N. Ll1F i c r� ua+F:'f FIRM Ott Ic ADDRESS �i-�[`1 L+} n �� , r• l i �- . m,lk '4,s- b PHONE_ 3 t, 3 — _L_ ZIP OWNER a r t ---. ADDRESS ZIP 3 '� 4 (/ Z. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT (DESCRIBE SPECIFICALLY AND COMPLETELY THE CHANGES PROPOSED BY THIS AMENDMENT. USE ADDITIONAI� PAGES IF NECESSARY) : `�};- Cet c•.�1-„ r��,,c—i—,_, .. �, ., I� .' INFORMATION BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY SI E DEVELOPMEla REVSTAFF DISTRIBUTION LIST (INDICATE INDIVIDUALS/AGENCIES TO RECEIVE PLANS FOR REVIEW, AND NUMBER OF PLANS TO BE DISTRIBUTED: I OF PLANS (10 REQUIRED) AGENCY/INDIVIDUAL COORDINATING PLANNER (1 PLAN FOR AMENDMENTS TO FINAL SDPS/ ALL REMAINING PLANS FOR AMENDMENTS TO PRELIM.SDPS) LANDSCAPE PLANNER REVIEWING ENGINEER E >` REVIEWING ENV. SPEC SAME)Q p'Z x F-IRE PROTECTION REVIEWER UTILITIES REVIEWER DATE VWI)ED: TRANSPORTATION x' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SAY OTHER 3 NOTE: THIS APPLICATION, ALONG WITH THE PRE-APPLICAT16 I D ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED AND NOTED THEREON, SHALL HE kMD SUMITTED TO THE COORDINATING PLANNER (WITH 10 SETS OF REVISED PLANS) FOR A SUFFICIENCY DETERMINATION PRIOR TO DISTRIBUTION TO THE APPROPRIATE REVIEW STAFF. IT IS ADVISABLE TO CONTACT THE PLANNER TO SET UP A PRE -SUBMITTAL CONFERENCE IN ORDER TO AVOID ANY DELAYS IN PROCESSING AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE SDP AMENDMENT APPLICATION. NOTE: THE APPROPRIATE AMENDMENT REVIEW PROCESS, EITHER PRELIMINARY OR FINAL, SHALL BE -DETERMINED AT THE PRE -APPLICATION MEETING AND SHALL DEPEND UPON THE SCOPE AND EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT(S). CHANGES DETERMINED TO REQUIRE AN AMENDED PRELIMINARY SDP WILL HE REVIEWED FIRST - ON A PRELIMINARY BASIS AND WILL, UPON PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, REQUIRE RE -SUBMISSION OF A FINAL PLAN. OTHER AMENDMENTS, DETERMINED AT THE PRE -APPLICATION MEETING TO BE SUBSTANTIAL IN NATURE, BUT WHICH REQUIRE MINIMAL CHANGES TO THE APPROVED FINAL SITE PLAN AND REVIEW BY A LIMITED NUMBER OF PROFESSIONAL, STAFF WILL REQUIRE A SUBMISSION OF A REVISED FINAL SITE PLAN ONLY. AND NOT A•SEPARATE PRELIMINARY SDP AMENDMENT. 0 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR C CO LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS BOC EOP DE L ME UE CUE EL or ELEV INV IF NGV D PVI N I C R/W or ROW SR STA lip FDOT CATV FPL or FP&L _ UTF It e C MP DIP PVC HDPE RCP ERCP MH BACK OF CURB or BACK OF GUI T ER q EDGE OF PAVEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT UT I L I TY EASEMENT COUNTY UT I L I TY EASEMENT ELEVATION INVFRT LINEAR FEET NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION NOT I N CONTRACT R I GHT OF WAY SOIL BORING STAT I nN UTILITY POLE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CABLE TELEVISION FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT UNITED TELEPHONE OF FLORIDA BASE L I NE CENTERLINE FLOW L I NE PROPERTY LINE CORRUGATED METAL PI PE DUCTILE IRON PIPE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PI PE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE ELLIPTICAL REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE MANHnI F STIR STORM SEWER STRUCTURE X.XX' Lt/X.XX' Rt FEET LEFT or FEET RIGHT NO NUMBER EXIST EXISTING OH OVER HEAD UG UNDER GROUND ELEC ELECTRIC RWM RAW WATER MAIN WM WA T E R MA I N FM FORCE MAI N PAVT PAVEMENT ESMT EASEMENT FF FINISHED FLOOR SYMBOLS AIR RELEASE VALVE, COMPLETE I N-L I NE VALVE W/ BOX F I RE HYDRANT, COMPLETE —�►' BLOW -OFF W/ BACTERIAL SAMPLE POINT —'� BACTERIAL SAMPLE POINT ' BLOW -OFF PI PE PLUG WATER METER o — IRRIGATION METER REDUCER —�— BACKFLOWPREVENTER/ABOVE GROUND METER E) SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER LATERAL & CLEAN -OUT PUMP STATION STORM SEWER & STRUCTURE HEADWALL CONTROL STRUCTURE --� MI TIERED END/FLARED END SECT I ON xx.x PROPOSED ELEVAT I ON xx.xx PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATION ++ EXISTING ELEVATION EX I ST I NG PAVEMENT ELEVAT I ON DI RECT I ON OF DRAI NAGE FLOW ^^— SWALE & DIRECT ION OF FLOW HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE UNDERDRAIN NOTE: OPEN SYMBOLS AND DASHED L I NES DENOTE EX I ST I NG IMPROVEMENTS r+M PART OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA A DEVELOPMENT BY TEMPLE SHALOM OF NAPLES LOCATION MAP 4630 PINE RIDGE ROAD NAPLES, FL 34119-4063 (941) 455 - 3030 F\ I N N.T.S. TEMPLE SHALOM P I NE R I DGE ROAD (CR 896) _ r i I �_� i II l -1 T! 1 -r"r I I r `•Ij n III I 44��� II III i ��� iifTiT.� 1 III III -- \• � III 41 III __. SITE LOCATION f0000e SITE MAP V Planners • Engineers • Ecologists • Surveyors • Landscape Architects • Transportation Consultants Wilson/Willer, Inc. Naples • Fort Myers • Sarasota • Bradenton • Tampa 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 • Naples, Florida 34105-8507 • Phone 941-649-4040 • Fax 941-643-5716 • E-mail Naples@ WilsonMiller. com • Web -Site www. WilsonMiller. com A, ,: INDEX TO SHEETS SHEET DESCRIPTION N0. 1 COVER SHEET 2 AERIAL 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE AND CLEARING PLAN 4 MASTER S I TE PLAN 5 PAVING, GRADING, DRAINAGE, & WATER SITE PLAN 6 PAVING, GRADI NG, AND DRA I NAGE DETA I LS 7 STANDARD WATER MA I N DETA I LS 8 EROSION CONTROL PLAN 'APPROVED iN7)08S I AN t 1 Al _ SDPI-2001-AR-491 Temple Shalom _— — �.��j Proj # 19990698 Q A 3 4/0( s NGINEER DATA Q 03/01 REV I SED PER I NSUBSTANT I AL CHANGE, SHEETS 4-5 MOD/1264 0 10/00 REV I SED PER RECORD DRAWING INFORMATION MOD/1264 /� 03/00 REVISED PER FDEP COMMENTS, SHEETS 3-5 AMC/1282 0 03/00 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS DATED 3/14/00 AMC/1282 0 02/00 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS DATED 2124100 AND 2/25/00 AMC/1282 1 02/00 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS DATED 1127100 AMC/1282 N0. DATE DESCRIPTION BY S-FATUS .- REVISIONS FROG EC1 IMANAUEk PkOJ ECI ENG I NELH t�kOJ ECI SUKvEYOR ADOLFO A. GONZALEZ BRETT J. ROSE.NBLUM, LANCE T. MI LLER P. E. # 42577 E. I . P. S. M. CHECKED BY ic�1'�1�� ``� DA1 E RECORD DRAWI NGS W A 1 f-- 4: DATE:—_..._... ihfuDerl?, 2000 .. .._.... ._ p/ y! �y �"RIN'�y THESE RECORD DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED TO �aJ DISPLAY THE COMPLETED MDRK 6UBSTANT I ALLY A CONSTRUCTED. THEY ARE BASED ON DATA FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTORI6) TO THE MAR �001 ENOI PEER. FIELD VERIFICATION OF CONDITIONS AND LOCATIONS SHOULD BE UNDERTAKEN PRIOR TOALTERATIONS OR CONSTRUCTION IN THE PROJECT AREA. "4- �y WI`SVI14V�I1j C'.I, il)c. RESERVED FUR SIAIUS AND DAIE biAMPS PROJ I* NUMBER C 03061-001-001-FLFCP uA I L F 1 LE NUMBER NOVEMBER 1999 D-3061-03 m ME414' - - - __w__ - H I Nt F< I Uk.;it R UIA 16" COLL I E R COUNTY WATER MAIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PARK ING SUMMARY TYPE OF USE QUANTITY REQUIRED RATIO EXISTING SPACES SPACES REQUIRED SPACES PROVIDED SYNAGOGUE: 302 SEATS 3 SPACES PER 7 SEATS HANDICAPPED 7 5 Q 8 88 PAVED 119 125 GRASS 87 244 TOTAL 213 130 340 WATER MANAGEMENT SUMMARY CONTROL ELEVATION (FT-NGVD) 25-YEAR, 3-DAY RAINFALL (IN.) I 00-YEAR, 3-DAY RAINFALL (IN.) 25-YEAR, 3-DAY PEAK STAGE (FT-NGVD) 25-YEAR, 3-DAY PEAK DISCHARGE (CFS) 100-YEAR, 3-DAY ZERO DISCHARGE PEAK STAGE (FT-NGVD) FEW F I RM ZONE AND ELEVAT I ON (FT-NGVD) MI N1 MUM F I N I SHED FLOOR ELEVAT I ON (FT-NGVD) RECOMMENDED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION (FT-NGVD) RECOMMENDED MI NI MUM ROAD CROWN ELEVATION (FT-NGVD) RECOMMENDED MI N1 MUM TOP OF PERI METER BERM (FT-NGVD) 11.2 11.69 14.95 13.3 1.33 14.2 ZONE X 15.0 15.0 13.2 13.5 S I TE SUMMARY SQUARE ACREAGE PERCENTAGE FOOTAGE OF TOTAL I MPERV IOU$ AREA: BUILDING 50,544 1.2 13.5% PAVEMENT/61 DEWALK 80.019 1.8 20.3% PERVIOUS AREA: LANDSCAPE / OPEN SPACE 255,262 5.86 66.2% CTOTAL: 1385.825 1 8.86 1 100.0% j NOTE: TOTAL 6 1 TE AREA I S 13.52 ACRES, BUT DEVELOPMENT IS ONLY PROPOSED FOR 8.86 ACRES. BUI LDI NG ADDITION FF=1 5. 00 SOD 0.01 ELEV=14.5---l' EXIST VEGETATION (TO REMAIN) 100'SETBACK N 8*-15' VARIES VAR I ES 10'-14' 65'-90' 4 ELEV=11 2 SECT I ON A -A N. T. S. LEGEND: PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION GRASS PARKING NATIVE VEGETATION/LANDSCAPE BUFFER (8.8 x 15% = 1.3 ACRES) A+* EXISTING ELEVATION (2X•X PROPOSED ELEVATION - DIRECTION OF STORMWATER RUNOFF GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE LOCAT I ON OF THE EX I ST I NG LIT I L I T I ES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROX I MATE ONLY. THE EXACT LOCATION SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. TEMPLE SHALOM OR ANY FUTURE ENT I TY W1 LL OWN AND MA I NTA I N ALL COMMON AREAS, OPEN SPACES AND AMET I T I ES. 3. POTABLE WATER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY COLLIER COUNTY WATER/SEWER DISTRICT. 4. ELECTRICAL POWER AND TELEPHONE SERVICE WILL BE PROV I DIED BY FLOR I DA POWER AND L I GHT AND SPR I NT. RESPECTIVELY. 5. PAY I NG, DRA I NAGE, WATER AND SEWER FAC I L I T I ES WI TH I N THE SDP AREA W1 LL BE OWNED AND OPERATED BY TEMPLE SHALOM. BUILDING SETBACK MATRIX REQUIRED PROVIDED FRONT 75' 150* REAR 75' 75' S I DE 30' 1 100' - PROPE RT Y LINE EXISTING PERIMETER BERM AND SWALE MATCH EXISTING SWALE BOTTOM EX I ST I NG WATER MANAGEMENT SWALE 111 II I -7 ------------------ - PROPERTY L I NF I -11,IDEWALK \ S ��$T SEWER S L UJI -9 t - - - - - - - - - ... 7- �r X11 M, 5,11 RN rp, 4.4,k g rt er 100' BU I LO ING SETBACK 011 51 N 6 4 12y V., 91,110' 1&1 41 , yA �.x �Tl =NI JFF15.00 FT-NGVD X, L'i 1rn, Jr AJ r_ J r Li L L N Y, 75 SETBACK PROPE RT Y L I NE '2& BUILDING t ADDITION EXISTING PERIMETER FF=15.00 ELEV=14.8 BERM AND SWALE I II I I Q uj 14 k co ELEV=14. 5 4 z *66* a-wft C== Q SEE PLAN V I EW ELEV=1 2.3 MATCH EXISTING FOR SPOT GRADES SWALE BOTTOM 0 1 I II PROPOSED SEPTIC DRAINFIELD PROPOSED SEPT I C SYSTEM STORM SEWER SECT I ON B-B L-) REFER TO SEPT I C DES I GN FOR (REFER TO PLANS BY KEENE I N G S ELEVATIONS AND SLOPES N. T. S. L------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENGINEERING FOR DESIGN) CENTERLINE OF SWALE------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------------------------------------TOP - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - THESE RECORD DRAWINGS AjE_Jh[T.LNDLPjQ - - - -- - - - -----------I TOP OF BERM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P-R-Ml - - - - - - - - --- DISPLAY THiE` COAPLETED NORK SUBSTANTIALLY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- A.5,0h�LLRU01ED TbEY_ARE_BA&E.Q_Qh.DA.1A - - - - - - I --------- PROPERTY LINE jelft 0 ,, - FI1RNIqI4FQ RY THF CONTRACTOR(S) TO THE 0 �Uul ENGINEER, FIELD VERIFICATION OF CONDITIONS L AND LOCATIONS SHOULD BE UNDERTAKEN PRI OR TO ALTERATIONS OR CONSTRUCT I ON I N B A'. ADDIEDCO : NMTE"PAIrl 0. Rry rSE0 BUILDING RENOVATION AREA PER ARCHITECTURAL . . . PLANS 01/01 MOD11264 BJR/1091, wilsolimiller, 111C. THE PROJECT AREA. REVISED 3- WATER METER LOCATION 10/00 MOD/1 264 BJ R/I 091 r Ci v r NI I i ALS W. NO. NOV 1999 Certificole of A1011 L I E N I • I LE: I r REVISED EXISTING UTILITY CONNECTION 03/00 AMC/1282 BJR/1091 DESIGNED BY: BJ R/1091 11 /99 -7 01 TEMPLE SHALOM OF NAPLES �,C;R,ZONIA, S'ZA­ REV I SED PER COUNTY COMMENTS DATED 3/14/00 03/00 AMC/1 282 BJR/1091 DRAWN BY: AMC/1282 11/99 1" = 30' MASTER S I T E PLAN VER11CAL V z .Nj REV I $ED PER COUNTY COMMENTS DATED 2/24/00 02/00 AMC/1282 BJ R/I 091 CHECKED BY: Planners • Engineers • Ecologists • Surveyors • Landscape Architects • Transportation Conpultants Aoellv P/ I 31,rlme I PROJECT: REVISE D PER COUNTY COMMENTS DATED 1/27/00 02/00 AMC/1282 BJ R/1 0 91 CONTRACT ADMI N. BY: WilsonMiller, Inc. N. T. S. D-3061-03 ON Naples a Fort Myers * Sarasota *)3radenton * Tampa SHALOM 2000 BUI LDI NG ADDI T I ON S; C: T WTI: k u E.: I LA 1 E �kAWN by/ E W. NO. CHECKEU by / EW. NO WilsonMiller APPROVED BY: 3200 Badey Lane, Suft 200 * NA*s. Florida 34105-W7 a Phom 94.1-649-4040 * Fax 941-843-5716 * Web-S6 www. w9sonmillOr com 1 15 49 26 03061 - 00 1 - 0 0 1 4 OF 8 ., 4 ow AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE Petitions PL20180003708 (GMPA), Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL20180003710 (PUDZ), Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Sharon Umpenhour as Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. State of Florida County of Lee The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 14th day of October, 2019 by Sharon Umpenhour, who is personally known to me �4, (Signature of Not Public) Carin J. Dwyer Printed Name of Notary G:1NIM Procedures/Affidavit Of Compliance - NFA Oct 30 2019.Docx (Notary Seal) i?`t* �.►yq' CARIN J. DWYER MY C0MM1S M # FF 97M EXPIRES: May 14, 2020 Banded Thru Notary PublIc Undarwftrs GradyMinor Civil Engineers a Land Surveyors • Planners o Landscape Architects October 10, 2019 RE: Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Petitions PL20180003708 (GMPA), Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL20180003710 (PUDZ), Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development Dear Sir or Madam: A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Temple Shalom, Inc. (Applicant) will be held on Wednesday, October 30, 2019, 5:30 pm at Temple Shalom, 4630 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34116. Temple Shalom, Inc. has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Rezone. The companion applications propose to create a new subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Element and to rezone the property from E, Estates Zoning District to CFPUD Zoning District. If approved, the applications would allow an additional building of up to 22,000 square feet for various religious and social organization uses to join the existing 302-seat church (religious facility) and increase enrollment for the existing pre-school/day facilities to allow a maximum of 200 children and to provide for accessory uses and structures. The subject property is comprised of approximately 13.5± acres, located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 0.6± miles west of Collier Boulevard in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Sincerely, Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician N Pine Ridge RD J —J m m L Project 0r"" 0 Location a Green BLVD G Project Location Map Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Ph.239-947-1144 Fax.239-947-0375 EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 www.gradyminor.com NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20180003708 (GMPA), Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL20180003710 (PUDZ), Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Temple Shalom, Inc. (Applicant) will be held on: Wednesday, October 30, 2019, 5:30 pm at Temple Shalom, 4630 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34116 Temple Shalom, Inc. has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Rezone. The companion applications propose to create a new subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Element and to rezone the property from E, Estates Zoning District to CFPUD Zoning District. If approved, the applications would allow an additional building of up to 22,000 square feet for various religious and social organization uses to join the existing 302-seat church (religious facility) and increase enrollment for the existing pre-school/day facilities to allow a maximum of 200 children and to provide for accessory uses and structures. The subject property is comprised of approximately 13.5± acres, located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 0.6± miles west of Collier Boulevard in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. o Pine Ridge RD J J m m L Project 0 0 Location Green BLVD The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed to Sharon Umpenhour, Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375. Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA. Petition: PL20180003710 & PL20180003708 Buffer: 1000' 1 Date: 9/23/2019 Site Location: 37926120008 �NAME'I i NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 FOLIO A & T INVESTMENT TEAM LLC 101 25TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120--- 9614 37926520006 ADRIAANSE, MICHAEL JENNIFER ADRIAANSE 4460 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4016 37924440007 AGUILAR, RAFAEL & HILDA 4600 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119---0 36612000006 ALBRETS, BEVERLY J & BILL 4711 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4000 37926080009 ALBRETS, BILLY LEONARD 4711 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--- 8911 37926600007 ALEMAN, SONIA 4540 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37926680001 ANA LYDIA ALEMAN QPRT 4860 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119--- 3912 38399440000 BECTHOLD, CAROL 4785 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4021 37925840004 BENNETT, LORI J 4730 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4022 37924040009 BIHLER, CHRISTINE A 4780 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37923920007 BLANCO, ALEXIE 4530 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37926720000 BOHALL, BLASE E & MARION 4600 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4020 37924240003 BOLANOS, ORLANDO 4451 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37927000004 BOW DEN III, W ILLIAM A MARY-ZOE BOW DEN 4580 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37924320004 BOWEN, PATRICIA D 4950 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116--- 3930 38398440001 BROWN JR, ALAN 140 WEST ST NAPLES, FL 34108---0 37926880005 CADREAU, SAMUEL A & DIANA A 4655 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4062 37926200009 CALDERON, HILDA & MAYKOL G 4461 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4066 37926920004 CALVERT, BRIAN WALLACE 4631 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4062 37926400003 CARR, CHARLES W & CLAUDIA S 4801 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116--- 3927 38399560003 CHIN, LLOYD V & VIRGINIA A 4630 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4020 37924280005 CRAIG, JOHN A HARRIET P CRAIG 4420 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119--4034 36613880005 DELGADO, GLORIA 198 W 50TH ST HIALEAH, FL 33012---0 37926960006 DUNN, JEAN C 4675 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4062 37926240001 EADS, ANTHONY L & MARY C 4925 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116--- 3929 38398320008 EDWARDS, MARK 4641 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37926320002 EVANS, CHRISTINA N 4580 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119---0 36612040008 FAIRHURST, PAUL 4601 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4019 37925640000 FAIRHURST, PAUL G 4601 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4019 37925600008 FERRIS, MICHAEL & COLEEN 4810 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119--- 3912 38399480002 FIELDS OF GREEN LAWN CARE INC 2316 PINE RIDGE RD STR 444 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 37923960009 FIGARES, ALEX R & INGRID 4845 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0 38286840001 FOLCH, LOUISE PO BOX 990084 NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37926840003 GIBSON, MARIAN H 1425 US 19S IMPERIAL COVE 14-B CLEARWATER, FL 33516---0 37925960502 GOJMAN, JORGE & MARY ANN 14 SWEET FERN RETREAT SAVANNAH, GA 31411--- 2949 38399320007 GOMEZ-PINO, LILIAM BEATRIZ EDUARDO PING SANTIESTEBAN 4660 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4020 37924160002 GURSOY, A SINAN 4841 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0 38287720007 GUY, MAURICE & KHAMSY 4650 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4020 37924200001 HAMMER, STEVEN C JOSEPH S HAMMER 4710 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37924000007 HERNANDEZ, ALBERTO 5405 TAYLOR RD STE 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 37927080008 HILBURN, DAVID T& JULIE M 4500 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4003 37926480007 HOLLEY, SHARON L LONNIE D STUBER 4811 TALLOWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5001 38399760007 HOTARANU, CRISTIAN MELANIA C BUDIU HOTARANU 3541 1STAVE SW NAPLES, FL 34117---0 37924360006 HUMOO LLC 1575 PINE RIDGE RD #10 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 37926640009 JONES, BOBBY D 4741 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4000 37926000005 JUSTINIANO, JULIO C PAZ 4771 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37925960007 KAMI L JONES 4741 PINE RIDGE RD EXT NAPLES, FL 34119--4000 37926040007 KINNEY, PETER JAMES LINDA DARLENE KINNEY 4661 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4019 37925720001 KOCSES TR, W ILLIAM J 4460 PINE RIDGE ROAD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37926800001 LEVY, JONATHAN P 4420 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4016 37924520008 LINK, JANET A 4615 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4062 37926280003 LOEWER, DOUGLAS G BEVERLY JEAN LOEWER 4780 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37925920005 MADDRILL, DOUGLAS & NANCY 4920 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0 38398280009 MARKOVICH, BRANDON DAVID 4870 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---0 38399280008 MC ALEAR, DANIEL J & DIANE M 4421 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4015 37925320003 MELHEIM, CHARLES J 4690 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4020 37924120000 MENTZEL, CHRISTOPHER C TAMMY L REITZ 6612 LINDBLOOM LN CHERRY VALLEY, IL 61016--- 9137 37926560008 MEYERS, PATRICIA A 4460 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119--4034 36612840004 NAFDOF 22 LLC 2316 PINE RIDGE RD #453 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 38399400008 NAGHIB, ALI B 4815 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 3927 38399600002 O'HARA, JAMES L & ROSENDA A 4541 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37925560009 OKEECHOBEE GGE TRUST 4044 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 8971 37926121007 OLIVE, JOHN & JESENIA 4590 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119--4036 36612040105 O'NEAL, OMALLEY & LISA 4725 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37925760003 PELOSI, JAMES J & DIANE 4810 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---0 38399680006 PEPPERS, DANIEL R & KATHERINE 4830 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116--- 3928 38399640004 PEREIRO, CARLOS M & TERESA D 10645 OTTER KEY LN ESTERO, FL 33928 --- 0 37924480009 PIWOWARCZYK, MARK & BRANDY 4781 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4000 37925961006 PRITCHARD, SCOTT 4861 TALLOWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5001 38399240006 R M PERGOLIZZI REV TRUST 4840 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119--- 3912 38399520001 RCM PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT INC 40 WEBER BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3054 36610040000 RECK, ALYCE ELOISE 4561 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4017 37925520007 SACACIAN, PETRU & CLAUDIA ANA 4791 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4021 37925880006 SARK, JOHN H & JUDIE J 4413 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4015 37925360005 SCHMELZLE, GEORGE C & JULIE A 4811 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119--- 3911 38287900005 SLOVA, ARGON & LULJETA 4510 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37926760002 SMIT, DARIN R 4490 LAKEWOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---0 37925440006 SMIT, DARIN R & DEBORAH S 4490 LAKEWOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---0 37925400004 SMYTHE, JOHN R & LAURIE S 4680 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34110---0 36611960008 SORLING, ANTHONY & KIRSTEN 4490 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119--4034 36612880006 SPARKS, W ENDY 4880 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119--- 3912 38399460006 STEINBACH, KARLA A 4397 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4013 37925200000 STEINBACH, KARLA A 4397 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4013 37925280004 STEINMANN, CLIFF W AMANDA ALLAN 4570 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4018 37924400005 TACKETT, VIRGINIA A PO BOX 953699 LAKE MARY, FL 32795--- 3699 37926161009 TANNASSEE SR, KENNETH R PO BOX 11623 NAPLES, FL 34101---0 37925940001 TAPALIAN, DAVID C PATRICIA TAPALIAN 4740 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4022 37924080001 TEMPLE SHALOM INC 4630 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4063 37926120008 TORRES, VERONICA ANGELICA 4510 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119--4036 36612760003 TRAN, NASH 4631 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4019 37925680002 VAN BENSCHOTEN, THOMAS C 4831 TALLOWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---0 38399720005 POList 1000 PL20180003710-PL20180003708.xlsx VILA, MATTHEW S & JENNY L 4530 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119--4036 36612800002 W ILLIG, GEOFFREY A & SARAH L 4745 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37925800002 YOCOM, BEN C & NANCY P PO BOX 111059 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 118 38399360009 YOUNG, AUDREY B & RICKY E 4489 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37925480008 ZERBO, CARL A & HEIDI L 4430 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4001 37927160009 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES AREA CIVIC ASSOC PO BOX 990596 NAPLES, FL 34116 POList 1000 PL20180003710-PL20180003708.xlsx Q GRADY MINOR AND ASSOCIATES P.A. OCT ATTN: SHARON UMPENHOUR0 3800 VIA DEL REY BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 Grady dinar A Assaciafes, P.A. Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Joe Heynen who on oath says that he serves as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. OCTOBER 11, 2019 —' - Subscribed and sworn to before on October 11th, 2019: Yvl uy.c;f_.1 rx_9-�') Notary, State of WI, County of Brown TA11A IvI0NI3L.00t1 IVatary L kj'l -. State of Wisconsin My commission expires: August 6, 2021 Publication Cost: 5932.40 Ad No: GC10284562 Customer No: 531419 PO#: NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20180003708 (GMPA), Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL20180003710 (PUDZ), Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Temple Shalom, Inc. (Applicant) will be held on: Wednesday, October 30, 2019, 5:30 pm at Temple Shalom, 4630 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34116 Temple Shalom, Inc. has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Rezone. The companion applications propose to create a new subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Element and to rezone the property from E, Estates Zoning District to CFPUD Zoning District. If approved, the applications would allow an additional building of up to 22,000 square feet for various religious and social organization uses to join the existing 302-seat church (religious facility) and increase enrollment for the existing pre-school/day facilities to allow a maximum of 200 children and to provide for accessory uses and structures. The subject property is comprised of approximately 13.5* acres, located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 0.6± miles west of Collier Boulevard in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Pine Ridge RD m m Project 2L©cation � Green BLVD The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor. com/planning. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed to Sharon Umpenhour, Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375. 17A I FRIDAY_ OCTOBER II. 2010 1 NAPLES DAILY NEWS Turkey presses Syrian assault as thousands flee Lufturis Pltarakis and Mohmut Guzel ASSOCIATED PRESS AKCAKALE, Turkey - Turkcy pressed its assault against U.S.-allied Kurdish forces in northern Syria on Thursday for a second day, pounding the region with airstrikes and an artii- I crybonibardlaeat dial raised columns of black smoke In A border town and sent panicked civilians scrambling m get out. Amid the thrice fighting, residents fled with their belongings loaded into cars, pickup trucks and motorcycle eicksli:uvs, while others escaped on font, The U.N. T Itui agency said tons of thousands were on the move, and aid ngencieuwarlied that neadyahalf-ind- licnpeople near the border Overeat risk. The Turkish air and ground assault was launched three days after U.S. President Donald Trump opened the way by pulling American hoops fioni their positions near the herder along- side their Kurdish allies. The move drew swift criticism from Ropublicans and Democrats in Coin gross, along with many national de- fense experts, who say it has endan- gered not only the Kinds and regional stabilitybW U.S. credibility as well. The Syrian Kurdish militin was the only U,S, ally in the campaign that brought down the Islamic State group in Syria. Trump wa road Turkey to act wi0i moderation during its assauli hat the opening barrage showed little sign of holding back: The Turkish Defense Mil- itary said its jets ant artillery had stuck 181 targets so far. 7Y:tkisli Foreign Minister Mevlut Cn- vusoglu said the militaty intends to move 19 miles into northern Sydn and that its Operation will last %mli€ nil "ter- rorists are neutralized." More than n dozen columns of ileich smoke rose la and Around the Syrian town of Tel Abyad, one or the offen- sive s first main W:gets. Turkish CIE- cials said the Kurdish militia has fired dozens of mortars into Turkish harder towns, Including; Akcakalc. As the shelling Inicnsilicd, cars packed with civilians crowded n bridge linkitig Svria and Iraq, hoping toescape die shelling and airstrikex. 71I1kish officials in two harder prov- inces said mortar lire from Syria killed ai load six civilians, including a 9- menth-nid boy and three gills under 15. On tl,-Syriml side, seven civilians and eight Kurdisli flghlers have been killed since theopemtionbegan. according to activists in Syria. A Kurdish -led group and Syrian ac- tivists saint that despite the hombard- areal, Turkish troops had not made much progress on sever:d fronts they had opened. But their claims Could not he independently verified. Turkish President ltecrp Tayyip Er- degan said 109 "terrorists- were killed in thv offensive, a reference to the Syrf- an Kurdish fighters. Ile did not elabo- rate, and reports from the area dirt not indicate anything rvnnlely -lase To such a large number of casuakies. Erdog;<u also warned the European Union not to call Anknriis incursion into Syriaan "invasion s fie threatened. us he bus in the past, to "open the gales" and let Syrian refugees flood into Eutvpc. The Syrian Kurdish fightos, along with US troops, have been involved in mopping -up operations against IS fighters still holed up in the desen after Iheir tvlritoriul hold was ruµpler; earlier this year. Ankara considers members or the Kurdish militia to be "terrorists" he - cause o£ their links In the outlawed Kurdistan Workers Party, or PKK, which has led an insurgency against Ttukey foe 35 y-nts. Tire conilict has killed tens of thousands of people. The U.S. and other Western countries also consider the PKK a terrorist group. Turkey, a NATO member, considers its operations Against the Kurdish aili- tla in Syria a matter of ils own survival, and it also insists it wont toleaa[e the vhtual selGnule that The Kurds suc. ceeded fit aan•ing out in northern Syria along the border. i-IOW VAGINAL. LASER THERAPY CAN HELP • Lesc cf F3adder Ccr=vd Leasaga Now You Can Feel Mate like Your Younger, Vital Sensual SDlf. '� .. �;� d ? &vyls a 6aotlAra h Lour 7.oeedne "# - � a� r -;� .,, "� r' aeu0n6dmFddrna Nlcm:nirdon IM1lrCne CFiie--qn •-e-fo,med i,Cv Naples Olga y�,;,rr��, 34J. 1,,1, Urrr amud— No tyrmrra_ 11, S:rreT, N. Ana heva 1250 Y,no R'dau Read Naples FL 34100 .. 1Prrt (r�# 239 351.1959 - .. SdeH ra 10 rw c I , [ Ile. `lpr. r ..'.$1O's'a4 r 'sscEEl: s s4 Y t P[Cn:m„ISR(SY:It Wellness. ft starts with you. CenC—Si. medial prociicc providing indiAduDlized DOnenl core in o relexod $.it 9. tvu work logwilt r to koup you healthy through Prevemnon and close Follow up, ^��.= CRISTINA SCIAVOLINO-DAY MD.LLC (239) 596-8702 1175 Creet,sski Parkway • S"le Naples, FL 34108 vrw+.,drsCiovoGnodcyeorn NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20180003708 (GMPA), Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict And P1.201801)(33710 (PUDZ), Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of 0. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Temple Shalom, Inc. (Applicant) will be held on: Wednesday, October 30, 2019, 6:30 pre at Temple Shalom, 4630 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34116 Temple Shalom, Inc. has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Growih Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Rezone. The companion applications propose to create a new subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Element and to rezone thu property from E, Estates Zoning District to CFPUD Zoning District. if approved, the applications would allow an additional building of up to 22,000 square feet for various religious and social organization uses to join the existing 302-scat church (religious facility) and Increase enrollment for the existing pre-school/day facilities to allow a maximum of 200 children and to provide for accessory uses and structures. The subject property is comprised of approximately 13.5c acres, located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately Di miles west of Collier Boulevard in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. rn PIA. Rldgo RD 7 J m m Project Location Green BLVD The Neighborhood Information Meeting is forinformaticnal purposes only, it is riot a public hearing. Project information is posted online at w%vw.gradyminor. comlpianning. It you have questions or comments, they can be direcled to Sharon Umpenhour, 0. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, surripenhuur®gradyminorcom, phone 239-947-1144, lax 239.947-0375. Tf&d SAVINGS & LOAN thirdfederat.corn Call or visit one of our convenient locations. open Saturdays. Bonita 5piings ( 239.949.4800 l Fort Myers 1 239-931-3338 FDIC Naples 1 239-213-9460 1 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20180003708 (GMPA), Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL20180003710 (PUDZ), Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development October 30, 2019 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY be 90IViseci*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. NAME: EMAIL: '*p'L U L Q)V_a"�'C'M't ADDRESS: n I— VIA , Olv PHONE:� S UL- NAME: &+ M ADDRESS: } f� �� �/�, f PHONE: rl r NAME:q�� %� y EMAIL: ADDRESS:&/ I /�—,Al <-f-r �E PHONE: f �O �� � Ih�.cet�- NAME: - � A* --,I U /J EMAIL: ADDRESS: (, 97 S �L ' " \ . PHONE: �Ll NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: CDt' j'W7 PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NIM Sign -in Sheet 10-30-2019 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20180003708 (GMPA), Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL20180003710 (PUDZ), Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development October 30, 2019 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***please be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. NAME: ADDRESS: 4,2ev °`` E /2 EMAIL: PHONE: 443 'C:'�—':v ¢ NAME: r r EMAIL: ADDRESS: 1 LZ_ PHONE: 7 9iJ Pi r- L; i 2-P1 L /V'4pl_65 F_L44 NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NIM Sign -in Sheet 10-30-2019 Petitions PL20180003708, Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL2018000371 01 Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) October 30, 2019 Neighborhood Information Meeting GradyMinor Project Team • Debra Antzis, President -Temple Shalom, Inc. (Applicant) • Marc Saperstein, Vice Chair and Project Leader - Jewish Federation Greater Naples • Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., Land Use Attorney - Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. • D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • Michael T. Herrera, P.E., Engineer - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • James M. Banks, PE, Traffic Engineer - JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. • Marco A. Espinar, Environmental Planning/Biologist - Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. • James Knafo, Architect - James Knafo Architect, Inc. 2 0 Alk �,. - 547 ifs � � ` ► .} f. S{ 'e. ' •1 v • T "�yeid 1� r 3 . , q. I r L � � � s • �� '. i { r,_ • �`{`k , I � � i - - - x � y, �."'���� . • � '`' ' �'-0r �r ;-�� cif � d - �� t ' + S � "e � ' 1 _ '� . 1-� � . s �; � 'f. :� ' r ` _ - k � err'. .•^q � Si n i�9 � _ 1 . . . � ;� - _ r ! of � ,# �' • QQ�. r*qa•e •�d �•ry rvi M �Vy -��i t A •��+ 4 � 1r �} •� � •� rw '.flg _,�s_yiy M• � "71�1�!.h�f �Y] �3' r �- - n _ ��s Y�. _ ,.�.. ':-1-� Yi-._ _-_`_I .-. .... �,J .. .. ..., ;;4>��. 4'�-i�.�"!►' i'� �44 ��i �e •�}•- .i .� •; :. . '} - - -r- - r- F. J�r r r�- a �µ� y.. � -L. $` '� '*7. �r,` � r i� •' ``' Y 1 ! •'•', }r,. - :� .+7 ►- y � .tip „ M , 4i -f y - �� • 4 a • _ l y �� .. Z r � . .lI . White Blvd Pine Ridge Rd �, r ` 'r S} .. ~ f p � .. i � � . .. � a - ! • � . • � I- pr - . �Y:. . . -r � f � f � 4 T• � � •� fn— �'r + r� ' r Rt. 'f' '}:•.�6.r.+{�` �•" k� ,jr " i i Aerial Map m 71 PINE RIDGE ROAD Pine Ridge RD Ll Project Information Current Zoning: E, Estates Temple and Related Uses and Facilities Provisional Use (Resolution 90-418) Child Care Center Conditional Use (Resolution 93-290) Proposed Zoning: Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Current Future Land Use Designation: Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict Proposed Future Land Use Designation: Project Acreage: 13.6+/- acres Temple Shalom Center Community Facility Subdistrict 5 Proposed Request Create a new subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Element and to rezone the property from E, Estates Zoning District to CFPUD Zoning District. If approved, the applications would allow an additional building of up to 22,000 square feet for various religious and social organization uses to join the existing 302-seat church (religious facility) and increase enrollment for the existing pre-school/day facilities to allow a maximum of 200 children and to provide for accessory uses and structures. n CFPUD Proposed Uses A. Principal Uses: 1. Religious organizations, including churches, temples and other places of worship; religious instruction, religious philanthropic and religious organizations (SIC 8661) 2. Child day care/pre-school center (Tracts 65 and 68 only) (SIC 8351) 3. Civic, social and fraternal association (religious affiliated only) (SIC 8641) 4. Educational, religious or charitable trusts (SIC 6732) 5. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the County Manager or designee, pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.06 K. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Administrative offices 2. Indoor and outdoor recreational facilities including but not limited to fitness facilities, playgrounds, nature trails, and similar facilities. 3. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the permitted uses within this CFPUD document. 4. Water management facilities to serve the project such as lakes. 5. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos, plazas and picnic areas. 6. Any other accessory and related use that is determined to be comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this CFPUD, as determined by 7 the County Manager or designee, pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.06 K. Prohibited Uses C Prohibited Uses: 1. Soup kitchens 2. Homeless shelters 3. Offender rehabilitation agencies 4. Public welfare offices 5. Self-help organizations for alcoholics 6. Refugee services D. Operational Staindar&,. 1. No outdoor amplified music shall be permitted after 8:00 p.m. 1-1 Proposed Development Standards PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA N/A N/A AVERAGE LOT WIDTH N/A N/A MINIMUM YARDS (External) From Pine Ridge Road ROW 75 ft. 75 ft. From Western PUD Boundary 100 ft. 50 ft. From Eastern PUa Boundary 30 ft. 30 ft. From Southern PUD Boundary 75 ft. 50 ft. (1) From Preserves 25 ft. 10 ft. MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 20 ft. 10 ft. MAXIMUM HEIGHT Zoned 30 ft. 2.0f. Actual 40ft. (2) 25ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA N/A N/A MA IMUM GROSS BUILDING AREA (TRACT 64) 22,000 sq. ft. N/A NOTES: (1) Except 40 ft. for the tarpaulin/shade cover over the outdoor play area, as depicted on the master plan, (2) Not to exceed a maximum of 2 stories t1 Proposed Conceptual Master Plan E,ESTATES RESIDENTIAL MINIMUM 211)' WIDE TYPED 4 PINE RIDGE ROAD LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH3 MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPED' 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE O — — _ d i > o 6' HIGH DECORATIVE J ° ° C9 ~ _ FENCE, EAST OF d �� e 111 = O Uj C] z PRESERVE, To 4 b ° J w n GRASS PARKING EXTEND 100' SOUTH WO 1L {} ❑ 9 �1 PROPERTY II I PROPERTY BOUNDARY BOUNDARY l I MINIMUM 6' WIDE 1111 LANDSCAPE BUFFER GRASS PARKIN BUILDING RESERVATION {SEE AREA NOTE #2} _m•'• \ GRASS O E, ESTATES E, ESTATES _m . PARKING ° — - RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL [:m: I p I _a ° i! m BUILDING y MINMINIMUM 15' "- C) z AREA PARKIN O m ®LANIDSCAPE BUMUMFFR WITH WIDE LAN❑ CAP TYPE8:.:. D I 6 HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE BUFFER WITH 6' > GR - ' HIGH CHAIN LINK I PRE-SCHOOL ; FENCE PARKING ❑ SE ICSYSTEM LEGEND SEPTIC SYSTEM J S rr'rh• 1 i 1 DRIVEWAY/PARKING OUTDOOR ® BUILDING T 4 TRACT65 PLAyAREA T_ RACT65ITRAC �1 MINIMUM 15 WIDE TYPE'B' SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH® E, ESTATES 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE o LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SDP-90-128 - TRACTS 65 & 68) RESIDENTIAL SCALE: 1" = 150' PRESERVE TRACT 64 AND PRESERVE PER SDP-90-128 TRACT 65 & 68 w FN o@ssx" ® DEVIATION ®GradyMinor U.CrW,M w; a.,eaKuue,P,.i TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUP JIp10 wi, - Rrf R4G piyuld Ru�^M.. Ir�Md. sdi3a EXHIBIT C CIr11 En�ineerx Laod 9unrynlx Manners Landuape .irchilecLs MASTER PLAN n� REVISED: 10/24/2019 &.npe %pulp¢ • 214 A-5i.1144 11l"2:N-1 I:,.. 9H6Cia 1 OY 2 1 10 Proposed Conceptual Master Plan Overlay ® MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPED' PINE RIDGE ROAD LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE, EAST OF PRESERVE, TO EXTEND 100, SOUTH 1t II E,ESTATES RESIDENTIAL MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPED a LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 4 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE GRASS PARKING PROPERTY Ilf�l��llll�llll BOUNDARY 1-7-11 MINIMUM 6' WIDE 1 LANDSCAPE BUFFER GRASS PARKING RESERVATION {SEE NOTE #2} �. E, ESTATES,m Q PARKIN RESIDENTIAL [Fk•C. ,_.: r"m• m BUILDING .. m AREA G7 MINIMUM 15' I WIDE TYPE'B' PARKIN T LANDSCAPE .. z BUFFER WITH 6' > I GRASS HIGH CHAIN LINK PARKIN 4 FENCE '- - BUILDING AREA a PRE-SCHOOL SEPTIC SYSTEM SEPTIC SYSTEM LEGEND DRIVEWAYIPARKING OUTDOOR �_j BUILDING TITRAC PLAY AR EA TITRAC SIDEWALK SOP-90-128 - TRACTS 65 & 6B E, ESTATES LANDSCAPE BUFFER � I RESIDENTIAL PRESERVE TRACT 64) AND PRESERVE PER SDP-90-128 TRACT 65 & 66 O O o Z S CIDn °e IVZ 1 O � 0 xw Uj BOUNDARY E,ESTATES RESIDENTIAL m Z to n 1 MINIMUM 15' WIDE TYPE'B' m 4 LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH . 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE MINIMUM 15 WIDE TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE N 0 725' 150' - SCALE: 1" = 150, WHEN PLOTrM A 6.2 k 11 _ ® u (''*H.. dAns.Kw, P.i TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD DEVIATION ®GradyMinor RWnIe RVa^N�•31uinvinuci an RIn=Ju 3"3, AERIAL WITH MCP OVERLAY [:evil P:n�inerrrc Land P.urve�+org Rannera Landecape Mchllecla DATE AERIAL FLOWN: JAN 2019 nla� SOURCE: COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER IL{Ine tiP�lf�: 2:i4.Wi.114{ • n Y. M1!'d4J11111Jr. f�M IbR MP'tlA� 23R.99a.{;{ga 8HB3w 1 Of 1 11 Conceptual Building Elevation THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES BUILDING PINE RIDGE ROAD VIEW PINE RIDGE ROAD, NAPLES COMPLETION IN FALL 2021 15 R C H I T E C T 12 Conclusion E,ESTATES RESIDENTIAL ` 4 ❑ MINIMUM 2D' WIDE TYPED' MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPED A PINE RIDGE ROAD LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH &HIGH_ - DECORATIVE FENCE 6' HIGH DECORATIVE ¢ 9 0 FENCE, EAST OF PRESERVE, TO4 I� GRASS PARKING EXTEND 100' SOUTH PROPERTY 1 BOUNDARY MINIMDM 6' WIDE P LANDSCAPE BUFFER GRASS PARKIN O RESERVATION (SEENOTE III - E, ESTATES Vim-. - p PARK NG '-°3— RESIDENTIAL m. p - p1 BUILDING Z - MINIMUM 15' AREA ..... . WI DETYPE'B' 1 PARKIN T _� LANDSCAPE'.'. Oz . BUFFER WITH 8' HIGH CHAIN LINK A I PARKING PRE-SCHOOI FENCE•••• _ _ SEPTIC SYSTEM SE TIC SYSTEM LEGENn — — — — CI DRIVEWAY/PARKING OUTDOOR BUILDING -T RACT 64I TRACT 65— PLAYAREq -TRACT 65ITRACT 68� - SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE BUFFER {SDP-90-128 - TRACTS 65 & 68 e, ESTATES RESIDENTIAL PRESERVE JRACT 64) AND PRESERVE PER SDP-90-128 TRACT 65 & 68 BUILDING AREA >_ x���x 22wo xpZz 4 �Uw�xm Q w W '—PROPERTY BOUNDARY IE, ESTATES RESIDENTIAL z y a MINIMUM 15' WIDE TYPE'B' m LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH ■ 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE I- �J N MINIMUM 15 WIDE TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH® 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE 0 1zs im SCALE: 1" = 150' tx�eu Homo � as x r r # DEVIATION TEMPLE SHALOM CFPU� ❑ ®GradyMinor nuaP Fygb EXHIBIT C <:xsl en�nenrR I.nm enr,� Rannerx fan�capn MchReclx MASTER PLAN REVISED: 10/24/2019 • Thank you — + w 2 13 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Wayne Arnold: All right. Well, good evening everybody. I'm Wayne Arnold and we're going go ahead and try to get the meeting started. It looks like we have a few neighbors and we have a lot of representatives from the temple and the Jewish Federation. I'm Wayne Arnold and here representing the project. It's — we're here for small scale plan amendment and a rezoning for the Temple Shalom property, which, you know, this building obviously is part of what's going to be their campus. Can everybody hear me okay? Speakers: No. Wayne Arnold: No? You can't hear that? Male Speaker 1: [Inaudible] [00:00:28] Wayne Arnold: It's on. [Crosstalk] Wayne Arnold: This better? Male Speaker 1: Yes. Wayne Arnold: Okay. I'll try to do that. So, let me make a few introductions. We have Rabbi Miller, who is standing over here. He's, uh, gracious enough to host us tonight. And we have Debra Antzis from the temple. She's sitting back here. And we have Jane Schiff and Jeffrey, uh, Feld from the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples. And, um, with me tonight, Sharon Umpenhour, she's taping the meeting for us. It's a code requirement. Uh, Jim Banks, sitting next to her, is her traffic engineer. Michael Herrera's here. He's the civil engineer from our office that's doing the, uh, site design work. Rich Yovanovich is our legal counsel, and, um — where's Clay gone? Clay Brooker is here representing the legal counsel for the temple. And then we also have some county representatives here tonight. They're here to monitor this and take notes. And David Weeks is here from long range planning, and Tim Finn from Zoning Department and Jeremy Frantz is here with land development and zoning, I guess — multiple roles tonight. But anyway, so, we're going to give a short presentation and tell you what we're doing with regard to the plan amendment and for the rezoning. I know that some of you — we held a meeting prior to the submittal of our documents and some of you were present for that meeting. And we're going to Page 1 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM go back through and update you on where we are with that process. So, let me find my clicker and I will get started. Maybe I will. Put your [inaudible] [00:01:571 up there, Sharon. There you go. Okay. [inaudible] maybe in reference to that, the location obviously — you're all familiar with the location. The temple property's about 13 and a half acres, and a portion of that's developed. The westernmost portion of the site's about four and half acres and has not been developed and is not part of the original conditional use approval that resulted in the church and the preschool being located here. So, this is a closer image of the campus itself. Obviously, to the right is the — the sanctuary, the temple building that we're in, and the preschool building is the southernmost building. The parking is in the center of the site, and then the westernmost portion of the site is the area that, um, is the larger subject of this amendment. Because it would give rights to this portion of the site that's currently vegetated to allow the Federation and the temple to build a joint building, approximately 22,000 square feet in size, to do sort of the philanthropic aspect of what the Jewish Federation does. And then, also some of the temple functions that, uh, could carry over there. And they host, obviously, special events and Bar Mitzvahs and other activities here that would give them other space as well to utilize on campus. And we think this makes good sense for all that they are doing in conjunction with each other, and their activities that they're currently involved in together. So, today the property is zoned estates. It's part of the Golden Gate area master plan, and we're proposing an amendment to the Golden Gate master plan that would give rights to the temple property to have other religious activities here, including those functions that are conducted by the Federation. And we're also changing the actual zoning of the land from estates to a planned unit development. And the planned unit development allows us to create a master plan for the campus, it allows us to establish development standards for the campus, and more importantly, list permitted uses and possibly prohibited uses that would be permitted on the site. So, the subdistrict request that we're creating is going to authorize the construction of the new, approximately 22,000 square foot building. And it would be for religious and social organization activities associated with those that are conducted by the Jewish Federation, as well as the temple. It would establish that the maximum intensity is 302 seats for the church facility or religious organization facility, which is the Page 2 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM capacity they currently have today. And we're having a slight increase in children from about 180 that they had enrolled last year to a maximum of 200 for the preschool function. They had an original approval for the preschool. They built the preschool building, and then — and increased their enrollment subsequently, so they're about 180 kids last year enrolled on campus. So, we're rounding that number up to 200. So, that, or the — the essence of our request — we're establishing permitted principal uses, which would allow the religious organization — churches, temple, other places of worship — the childcare preschool center, civic, social, fraternal organization, religious affiliated uses, education, religious, or charitable trusts — which is a large part of the fundraising activities that both organizations do — and then any other use that standard language that's comparable, that's, uh, something that we typically have. And then, of course, we establish accessory uses that would be permitted that include the administration offices, the indoor/outdoor recreational activities, and other things like open space and water management that are a part of all of our, uh, submittals. We also are prohibiting certain uses in the project. And we've prohibited soup kitchens, homeless shelters, offender rehabilitation agencies, public welfare offices, self-help organizations for alcoholics, and refuge services, because those are things that the county, and a lot of church -related functions these days — there are carryover activities and we've put these and other — as restrictions in other projects we've worked to make sure that it's understood what you can't have on campus. And then, one of the operational standards we're proposing would be a limitation that no amplified outdoor music permitted after 8p.m. We are establishing our own development standards and we've specifically limited the non -sanctuary type building use and the preschool use to the 22,000 square feet that's identified in your table. We're keeping our zone height at 30 feet, which is the standard that's currently in Golden Gate estates, and establish an actual height of 40 feet, which is, Mr. Yovanovich coined the phrase, "It's kind of the tippy-top number." So, any [inaudible] [00:06:431 above the two-story building that they're proposing for the Federation building would have a maximum height of 40 feet. This is our conceptual master plan that we've developed for the property, and I'll just walk you through a little bit of that. Uh, main access point obviously on Pine Ridge Road is located here where Page 3 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM I'm highlighting on the screen. We're proposing a second access to the site, um, that would service, um, sort of the centerpiece. It's called tract 65 as part of the legal description, and so a new access point would be located here. Uh, we're still talking to the county about what that would be, in terms of right in/right out, left in. The county has not completed our review yet and we're still negotiating that with them. But the principle part — [Male speaker interjection] Wayne Arnold: If I could finish my presentation, I would be happy to take questions. The main building area remains the same for the temple and the preschool. The parking areas remain largely the same. Uh, open space areas on the perimeter remain the same there, and then the — the bigger changes obviously are impacted by development of the four -and -a -half -acre westernmost parcel. We're showing parking areas adjacent to the Pine Ridge Road area. The main building area is highlighted here on the master plan. And the center part of the site: future septic system for the expanded building on that site. And then, we have our preserve area that we've placed along the entire western side of the — the — the community. County staff has reviewed this. They are comfortable with the preserve location in there. Uh, it serves two functions: it serves as a buffer, as well as our required preservation of native trees on the site. This is an aerial overlay showing you the master plan and how it relates to, you know, what's on — on the ground today. And we have a building rendering of the conceptual building for the new — new building that would be shared with the Federation temple on the westernmost tract. And that's about a 22,000 square foot building, and it's obviously in the conceptual stages today and it's, uh, not that far along in the physical design of it, but we have some images and working with our building committee to keep refining that. So, in conclusion — you know, again, we're in for the small scale amendment and the PUD zoning that they're going to establish the requirements to allow us to have the current functions on the side, as well some of those activities I highlighted that are part of the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples. So, with that I'm happy to take questions from the audience and try to answer questions. We have obviously people from both the temple and the Federation here who obviously can answer questions. Yes. David? I'm sorry? David Weeks: Just please remind people to give their name. Wayne Arnold: Oh, sure, and thanks for the reminder. The county staff and the Page 4 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM planning commission would like people to give their name if they don't mind. Or if not, they just want to be able to distinguish if you're a neighbor, or you're on our development team, so when the transcript of this comes out, they know sort of who's talking and who's asking the questions. So, be happy to — question — I'm going to pass the microphone to whoever wants to ask questions, so we can make sure we capture that. So... Douglas Loewer: My name is, uh, Douglas Loewer. I have property directly to the west of the site, and probably am the one that's most impacted by what's going on. Uh, I'm a professional engineer. I'm registered in Florida. I'm also registered in five other states. My background is in sewer water and storm water. I have, uh, got my license in 1980, was registered in Florida in 1983. Uh, I also hold licenses as a wastewater and waterworks, uh, operator and superintendent. All four licenses for waterworks and wastewater works. And I design the — designed, built, and operated the largest septic field system that was ever put in the ground. So, uh, this is my area of expertise, a lot of what's going on here. I have a couple questions to start with. First of all, I'm for the project. The — I've read through about 20% of what Brady Minor put on and, uh, with the county, and I ran into some disturbing stuff. And uh, like to get probably the legal stuff taken care of first, and then get into the design problems. Um. Exhibit F of the Temple Shalom, and CFPD lists the developer commitments. It says, uh — there's a section here that says, `As owner and developer sell off tracts,' the Temple Shalom being the owner and developer, uh, the [inaudible] [00:12:031 and so forth. Uh, I wasn't aware that Temple Shalom was going to be in the process of selling off tracts. I thought that Temple Shalom would be continuing here, and I want them to continue here. They've been a good neighbor. But if they're going to be selling off tracts and we're talking about new people, uh, I'd like to know who the new people are, or what the plan is, so that I know who's going to be moving in. Wayne Arnold: Okay. I'll — I'll be happy to answer your question. This is Wayne Arnold. That is standard PUD monitoring language that the county requires us to put in, because they track these on an annual basis so they can, um, tell how much activity has occurred on site. They want to deal with one entity, so if anything is ever sold, they know that there's still going to be a single entity that they can contact to find out information about this property. That's why that language is there. Page 5 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Douglas Loewer: Uh, it shouldn't be saying `sell off tracts.' Wayne Arnold: I — we use this exact language that the county attorney's office gives us. Douglas Loewer: Well, that's — Wayne Arnold: And — and there's no prohibition on anybody selling their property. So — Douglas Loewer: No, but, uh, with this and the other things that I found through the — through the, uh, Brady Minor submission, um, it certainly appears that they're going to be moving on. Wayne Arnold: I'm not aware of that, but it — there's nothing that would prohibit the — the temple or anybody else from selling their properties, so — anyway. Yeah, some other comments or questions there? Douglas Loewer: Oh yeah. I've got a stack of them. Wayne Arnold: Okay, let's keep moving through it, because other people may also have questions. Douglas Loewer: Number — number two, was, uh, when you look in the traffic, um, study, it says that the — the 22 — thank you — the 22,000 square feet of associated office space, um — I thought the Federation and Temple Shalom were two different agencies. When I met with Ms. Antzis over here, she said that, uh, there was going to be at least [inaudible] [00:14:041 of some sort, and they [inaudible]. Traffic study indicates that uh, uh, Temple Shalom's new building is gonna have associated offices, and then go up higher and say that, uh, um, they don't know what the associated offices are. Uh, I was unaware that there was gonna be such a changeover between the two. I thought these were basically two separate projects on the same site. Wayne Arnold: Well, this is Wayne Arnold again, and the information in the traffic analysis — you — you have to classify a building for what its closest classification is, so Mr. Banks ran traffic numbers based on it being an office. There's no doubt about it: the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples wants to have its own office space in the new building, but it's also going to be a potentially shared space so the temple can also have functions and activities there as well. Douglas Loewer: Are the — is the temple actually gonna have office — offices in the Page 6 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM 22,000 square foot room? Wayne Arnold: I don't know if the temple intends to actually have office space. They have office space in the current building that we're in today. Douglas Loewer: Yes. I didn't know if they were expanding into the building also. Wayne Arnold: The building is still capped at the 22,000 square feet that we expressed in the traffic analysis and our zoning documents. Douglas Loewer: So, that's — we're — we don't — we don't know what the income is gonna come there. Wayne Arnold: I can't predict that future. I mean, if some date in the future, Debra needs to expand office space, that's where it would be a logical place to do it. Douglas Loewer: Um, I read the 2017 brochure put out by the Federation and they draw upon about 8,500 people in Uster Count —in Collier County and about 1,500 people outside of the county. So, they have a — a draw of about 10,000 people that they — they can service. Um, nowhere in there, and nowhere in any of the documentation does it indicate how many people they do service. I was wondering if, uh, uh — we did [inaudible] [00:16:171 last time we were here that it was 100 people would be coming into the — the new building each day, but I — I know that 10,000 people aren't servicing 200 a year — 200 people a year, 500 people a year, 1,000 people a year. Not — because some of those — some that are coming in are coming in on repeated days. Jane Schiff: [inaudible] [00:16:401 Wayne Arnold: Jane, if you're gonna speak, I need you to be on the record. Douglas Loewer: I'm not sure where [inaudible] [00:16:51] Jane Schiff: Okay, uh, Jane Schiff [inaudible] Jewish Federation of Great Naples. Um, we service, I would say about 2,000 of our nearly 10,000 that the compilation study that you were referring to says that there are approximately 10,000, um, between Collier County and [inaudible] County. We — the 100 people a day that you are referring to are what we were expecting, um — are what we were — would expect on a typical day. There will be a dozen days a year where we have 400 or 500. We might want to mont—monetize the building in offseason and make it available to other people who want to rent it for a day or the event. So, we figure probably 15 or 20 days a year Page 7 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM — tops — and would be more than that a day. Douglas Loewer: Okay. Well, the reason I'm bringing — the reason I was asking the question was that in your future directions area, that copy, it says, `It's difficult to project whether the community will grow or shrink,' and that's because 83% of your, uh, the people in the family are 60 years old and older. Jane Schiff: Correct. Douglas Loewer: And uh, you do not have a very good following thereafter. Uh, in 1% in most of the categories: 20 to 30, 30 to 40, 40 to 50. And the reason I think that's important is that I want you all to succeed. I want you to be there for a long time. I don't want to have a change where you have to move out because you don't have enough people to support your operation, and Temple Shalom has to re -rent and we get a — a — a less satisfactory — don't want to call you tenant — but — Wayne Arnold: Neighbor. Douglas Loewer: — with a leased neighbor or whatever you want to call them in there. And uh, I don't — we — when I was talking with Miss Antzis there about a 50 year lease, uh, if you only make it down the line four or five years and you can't support the 22,000 square foot building — that you don't have enough people coming in, and we have to have a new — a new entity move in. You know, I don't want Hertz Rent - a -Car moving in, and having people in and out all the time. Jeffrey Feld: Um, I'm Jeffrey Feld. I'm the CEO of the Federation and I can't make a promise, because 50 years from now, I'm not gonna be here. You're not gonna be here. However, I can tell you, that as the Jewish community is growing, and the services are being utilized in terms of bringing people together, the Jewish community is growing. We're bringing more people together. Um, I don't think is a concern we need to have at all. Douglas Loewer: Okay. In other words, I would just like to see it continued the way it is. Jeffrey Feld: From your mouth, [inaudible] [00:19:68] [laughter] Douglas Loewer: Um, when I tried to break in earlier there, I was trying to comment on the second entrance to the, uh, outside — well, the new one. Um, it's my understanding that, uh, both in Submission 1 and Submission 2, the county has rejected that second, um — that second entrance. Page 8 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Wayne Arnold: Our last submission, they conceded that we would be allowed at least to have a right in, and Mr. Banks is having continued dialogue. We think they're going to — they being the county — are going to allow us to have the access that we — as we have proposed. We don't have that formalized yet, and there will probably be conditions on it, but that's what we're still going to continue to push for, that full second access point. Douglas Loewer: And as far as the access point goes in your study, you said that, uh, there would have to be a — a U-turn put into the median somewhere. Jim Banks: A left turn, yes. Douglas Loewer: Left tuna/U-turn. Obviously, that can't be done at the main entrance. I was wondering how far down you were proposing to make that U- turn? Jim Banks: It's gonna be put at the main entrance. It's gonna be right across, uh, the left turn lane. It's coming in to the Temple Shalom map, so the intersection is symmetrical. Douglas Loewer: So, there's really no need for the other entrance because you're gonna be turning everybody at the same place. The only people you — the only people that would be going out would be people going to the east down Pine Ridge that aren't gonna have go down — change lanes and — what is that, 300 feet? Or less, if you have an access lane, and then make a U-turn into oncoming traffic. Jim Banks: U-turns are just part of the design here for all of them. We do them throughout the county. Douglas Loewer: So, your plan is to make the new one right turn only, and then make a U-turn 300 feet away from that, uh, for the whole project? That's what your plan is? Jim Banks: I'm not sure what you mean by the — for the whole project. Full access for the main road, yes. Essentially, we're gonna put in a left turn lane, to allow people that prefer to exit out at the new site into a U-turn. It doesn't mean they have to. They can still turn a left out at the main entrance, or they can around and do a U-turn at the traffic light. It doesn't mean they have to do it. We're going to put that provision in. It will serve this project and it could serve anyone else that's over to the west of us that — that does not full access on the primary — Douglas Loewer: So — so you think that pulling out of the new entrance, making a right turn, and cutting across — changing lanes to the left, and then Page 9 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Jim Banks Douglas Loewer: making a left getting in, and then getting into the left turn lane to make your U-turn, that that is a safe proposition? Yes. We have — there's multiple locations in Collier County where we — Just because there's multiple locations in Collier County doesn't mean they're safe. Jim Banks: These multiple locations have not proven to be safety issues. We've analyzed this, [inaudible] [00:23:03] analysis of that, and that we determined that it would be safe. It will be — any permit that's issued by the county is conditioned that if an access point is deemed unsafe, it can be removed. So, there is a condition — there will be a condition if it's approved that it can always be removed if it's unsafe. We don't believe it's gonna be unsafe. It's not anything unique. They're — they're typical throughout Collier County and they've been proven to work. Thank you. Wayne Arnold: Thanks Jim. Douglas Loewer: Have you considered putting the main access at the — in the new spot? Jim Banks: No. Wayne Arnold: No, I don't think we've considered that. Douglas Loewer: Okay. Uh. I just pulled a set of documents, uh, off the internet under preserve, allowing the uses. Um, number four says, `Water management and water management structures.' Uh. If I compute the stormwater requirements properly, you're gonna take up the entire preserve area with water management and water management structures. Wayne Arnold: I think if you'll note on our master plan, we have a separate area that's going to be our water management system. What that contemplates is, sometimes you're allowed to dissipate water in a preserve, or you can discharge to it depending on the type of vegetation. That's standard language that we have in almost every PUD that we've worked on. Douglas Loewer: Well, you know, I'm — I'm sorry, but when it comes to standard language, that's when you get in trouble. Wayne Arnold: Well, I can tell you, dealing with Collier County, there's a lot of Page 10 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM standard language we put in a project that may or not be applicable, but that's the way the county operates. I mean — Douglas Loewer: So, it's not your intention to put any water management or water management structures in the preserve? It's simply as an allowable use. You simply have it in here as a, uh — because the planning requires it. Wayne Arnold: Well, I don't know that we would never put in any water management in it. I think Michael Herrera, our design engineer, is still looking at the site plan and doing design. We don't have a water management district permit. Southwater Water Management District ultimately tells us where we discharge and how — how frequently we discharge water from the site. I'm not trying — Douglas Loewer: We're not talking about discharge. We're talking about the preserve areas. Wayne Arnold: Yes, I understand that. And they all function together sometimes, is what I'm trying to say. Douglas Loewer: Well, if you're going to tear down the, uh, preserve areas, to put in water management and water management structures, there's no preserve area left. Wayne Arnold: The county — the preserve area would depict on the plan, as preserve will have to be placed in a conservation easement. Douglas Loewer: Yeah, but you have it as an allowable use. Wayne Arnold: And the county, I'm telling you, does make provisions for you to have some limited water management use of your preserve. And I don't know the answer tonight of whether or not we will be putting any water in that preserve or not. Douglas Loewer: Then why don't you commit to not put any in there tonight? Wayne Arnold: Because I don't know if I can design the site without doing that. We have not done that level of detailed engineering design. Douglas Loewer: We're here for a uh — an informational meeting. Wayne Arnold: This is an informational meeting for the [inaudible] [00:26:10] and zoning — yes. This is a — Douglas Loewer: And the way I understand the code, this is the only one you're gonna Page 11 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM have. And you — and you — is that correct? Wayne Arnold: This is the only required neighborhood information meeting. Douglas Loewer: Okay, and you don't intend to have another one? Wayne Arnold: I don't think we have one scheduled, but, you know, we have had dialogue for the last several months and we're happy to continue dialogue with you, Mr. Loewer. Douglas Loewer: Uh. Well, I think that — I think it's important if you're going to tear down the preserve area for water management. I think that's the important issue. Wayne Arnold: Well, I understand your concern, but the county will not let us remove the native vegetation from the preserve in order to use it for water management. Douglas Loewer: Well, once again, maybe if we had another meeting you could tell us what — how many square feet you were going to put water management in the preserve area, rather than not being able to tell me anything. Wayne Arnold: Well, I don't have that — Richard Yovanovich: At this point — Wayne Arnold: Hey Rich, maybe you want to — Richard Yovanovich: For the record, I'm Rich Yovanovich, I'm the attorney for the property. You're asking for a site development plan of the detail to be done at the rezone level of the project. That's not simply how it's done. You will have an opportunity, if you want to, to review all of the site development and documents [inaudible] [00:27:271 and engineers [inaudible], give your input to Collier County staff that we're ready to do [inaudible]. And I'm required to do it now as part of the PUD process. We are allowed to use preserves as part of the water management. We are not allowed to remove any vegetation to do so, so the characterization that we're going to go in there and destroy those preserves is simply not correct. And we're not going to get into the site development plan level of details tonight. We're here to talk about the uses of the property and what uses, if any on each of the different areas of the property, will not [inaudible] Douglas Loewer: I guess my question for you is, is that a requirement at number four? Is that something that the Collier County requires in every document? Page 12 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Richard Yovanovich: It is a standard condition in every Collier County PUD that we can use preserves as part of the water management system as we go through the same — the detailed site development process. That is a standard condition that is in the use. Wayne Arnold: Thank you, Rich. Douglas Loewer: Well. My understanding of the — I guess it's the PUD, uh, one of the two of them anyway — is that, uh, you can basically shape your zone — what you're requiring in the zoning — for your one little area. It doesn't really have to be, uh, what the commercial's calling for or what the, uh — or what residential's calling for. You basically tailor the — the, uh — the requirements and setbacks and parking and things like that, uh, based upon just something that, uh, that fits. Uh, I noticed that, uh, when you — I figured your parking for the area — you figured it at, uh, one space per 200 square feet. Works out to 110 spaces. But the building has a large assembly area in it with 160 seats in it. Now, my understanding is that when you have an area that has a different use than the rest — that's not office space, you would split it out, figure up the parking on that, and then figure up the rest of the parking on the — on what's — on what's remaining. When I figured that up, I come up with 140 spaces, uh, based upon what the county requires: 1 per 300 and three per seven, uh, for the — for the assembly area. And I could find nowhere where 100-200 was a — was a number other than on this particular design. Now, do you intend to go to treat the, uh — assembly area as office space? Is that what — because that's what you're doing. Wayne Arnold: Well, if I can answer — this is Wayne Arnold. First of all, general office space isn't calculated at 1 per 200. The 1 per 200 is a higher medical office parking ratio, it requires more parking. And the other thing that you didn't mention is that we're going to be sharing parking throughout the entire parking lot for the special events that would occur here, just as the temple would then share in ours when they had a special event. Douglas Loewer: Well, 140 spaces won't — even 1 10 140 spaces will not be enough for special events, so you're going to — you're going to be sharing it anyway. Wayne Arnold: That's exactly what I said. Yes. We intend to share parking. Page 13 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Douglas Loewer: What — what — well, how would you arrive at — oh, you said it was a medical requirement. Wayne Arnold: It's — it's a high parking standard, and it's — furthermore I could argue with a straight face that I don't need any parking for the separate building because it's all part of the religious campus that has parking based on how many fixed seats we have in the sanctuary; three per seven parking spaces. Douglas Loewer: Well, if you think you're accommodating — on any the existing building has, it's — it has 174. Is it — no, needs to have 174. I couldn't count them because so many were grass parking. Wayne Arnold: But I think to the point on the parking, for any church or religious facility that's parked at three seats per seven spaces — three spaces per seven seats, excuse me — the — you know, that doesn't always account for the wedding, or a special religious event, or the High Holiday that they may have. So, the standards are written for the averages and we're comfortable that we have ample parking based on the standard for what we're proposing. Douglas Loewer: And you can assure us that their people won't be parking, uh, in the median and on either side of the shoulders, uh, during the year. Wayne Arnold: I can never assure you of what a private individual may do. Yeah. Douglas Loewer: Because they're — they're — they arrived on the — they were parked all the way down the med—the shoulder last week. I mean — Wayne Arnold: No, I understand your comment. I can't — Douglas Loewer: — you have the traffic situation with people coming out. We got people parked on the, uh — on the — in the median and the shoulders. And — and nobody seems to consider this a problem. Wayne Arnold: Well, I think the one — the one things you can do, like everybody can else do, is you have an issue and you think it's an unsafe condition, you can call the Collier County Sheriff's office and they can come and cite those people for parking in the right of way. I know that doesn't help the immediate situation, but I don't know that I can ever guar —give you that guarantee that nobody's ever going to park on the county right of way. It may not even be anybody related to this — this facility. Douglas Loewer: Describe that to the person that pulls out from the shoulder, and whose car gets hit and the person gets killed. Page 14 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Wayne Arnold: Okay. Mr. Loewer, I understand your — your comment. Douglas Loewer: We'll get back to this. Wayne Arnold: Yeah. Douglas Loewer: You are requesting a deviation. One: parking spaces, uh, with a 70% grass parking. Uh, you — even in the first section, you say that 15% is, uh, normally what off-street parking in the grass is. Um, you don't have 70% up there. Where is the rest of it going to go? Wayne Arnold: This is — Mr. Loewer, this is considered a conceptual masterplan. This is not a detailed engineering construction site plan. Douglas Loewer: We're doing a rezoning. Wayne Arnold: Yes, we are. Douglas Loewer: And you are basing that rezoning on things that you can do within this — this area. I — if we're going to — if we're going to do the rezoning, and then get the permit down the line, that's not how it works. Wayne Arnold: That is exactly how it works. Yes. This is not a construction level permitting exercise. Douglas Loewer: Well, my problem is: who — who's going to be running that building? Richard Yovanovich: Who's running what building? Douglas Loewer: Well, what you're saying is that as long as Temple Shalom rents to the Federation, they can — they can rent that building. But when — when the — if the Federation should fail, the Federation should move out — if Temple Shalom should move out, and somebody wants to move back in there, and you're tailoring the project to them, how is anybody ever going to move into to that — that space? Richard Yovanovich: Well, as you read the list of — sorry, for the record: Rich Yovanovich. If you read the list of permitted uses that can occur on the property, regardless of who the occupant is, whether it's the temple, whether it's the Jewish Federation, the uses are limited to child daycare preschool, which is on tract 65 and 68, which are the two to the east. Page 15 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Douglas Loewer: Well, that's fine. But — Richard Yovanovich: You want me to answer your question? Douglas Loewer: What if Temple Shalom rents to somebody else and they have a daycare that has a fulltime lunch in it? Richard Yovanovich: Well, let — can I finish? Before you — the next use is civic, social, and fraternal associations — religious -affiliated only. Very limited group of potential occupants of the property. Educational, religious, or charitable trusts, limited uses on the property. Religious organizations, including churches, temples, and other places of worship, religious construction. Religious, philanthropic, and religious organizations — a very limited group of people — and any other principle use which is comparable in nature to those uses. So, the universe — uh, people or organizations that can use this property are very small. There's no prohibition from having a daycare that actually feeds its students. Douglas Loewer: Are you going to make them increase the septic field when they do that? Richard Yovanovich: When we get to the level of detail to do that, yes, I'm sure the county is going to say, "How big is your kitchen?" And based upon how big the kitchen is — I'm not an engineer, but I've done enough projects — the county has regulations that say `This is how big your septic tank needs to be.' I'm assuming it's similar to the fact that I have a septic tank at my house. Based upon the square footage and the number of bathrooms, and the number of — I only have one kitchen, but it's theoretically could have more. That is all required by code and the engineering standards for that, which we will meet every one of those standards. We are just simply asking for the right to do those things today. In Collier County, there's a — there is a detailed site development plan process that we go through next where the detailed engineering, including the size of the septic field, will be decided. The number of parking spaces will be decided based upon what we put in the building. Today is not the day that we do that. We do that through a site development plan process, and that's what we're going to do. You're — you are asking us to do something way beyond the detail level that we're at right now for Collier County improvement plans. Douglas Loewer: So, what you're saying is, is everything is a political thing. Page 16 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Richard Yovanovich: No, I never said it's a — actually, zoning is a quasi-judicial thing in Florida, which means that there are very specific standards, that if we meet them, we get them approved. It's not a political thing. Douglas Loewer: Well, I can tell you right now that the amount of area you have there for drainage is not near what you need, and by the time you fix the parking and the drainage and the septic, there's not going to be room for the building. Richard Yovanovich: We'll see. We — we have a different opinion with different professionals. Douglas Loewer: Well, if you all are — you're making an opinion now of what to fit. You have — you say you aren't an engineer — you aren't looking at the numbers, but you're going with what's up there. I can tell you right now that my biggest single concern is that — even Mr. Hernandez says that, uh, it's nine —is that correct? Wayne Arnold: Herrera. Douglas Loewer: Herrera? I'm sorry. I apologize. Uh, anyhow, uh, that we're having 9,000 gallons of a day of sewage being put into the ground. There are three houses there — we've had around 1,000. I think that's something that should be with the rezoning because, uh, that's ultimately going to contaminate the groundwater. Richard Yovanovich: Well, I'm sure that Mr. Herrera will be required to meet the required development standards that exist in the — Douglas Loewer: Now, he was very clear in our last meeting that the only thing he was interested in was the minimum standards and whatever costs the least. I met with him for 20 minutes. Richard Yovanovich: I — I understand, and I don't want to get into a huge, long debate with you tonight about your feelings about Mr. Her —Mr. Herr —got me calling him — Douglas Loewer: Well, he's doing — he's — Richard Yovanovich: Mr. Herrera and what you think will happen — Douglas Loewer: He's doing what he was told. Richard Yovanovich: I will tell you at the end of day, if we can't fit the 22,000 square foot building that we're going to hopefully get approved through the zoning process, we'll have a smaller building. My guess is — an I've Page 17 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM known Michael for a long time — he's got a pretty good idea of what will fit based upon what's on the property and we're willing to go through that process — Douglas Loewer: Well, my concern about the 70% grass is that that changes the stormwater. Richard Yovanovich: And again, we have a very detailed site development plan process that will handle water management. And do you know who should call? Call Matt McClain — Douglas Loewer: I got it. He won't return my call. Richard Yovanovich: Well, I'm sure then call — can get his — his, you know, direct number if you don't have it. Douglas Loewer: I called six people over there since I met with — where's Mr. Mirandas? Is he here? Richard Yovanovich: They've got — they've got David Weeks. You've got Tim Finn. Douglas Loewer: I called — [Crosstalk] Wayne Arnold: You can't talk over each other. Richard Yovanovich: They will be happy to pass along to Mr. McLean that you would like a return call. That's all I can do tonight. So, could — could we move on to not detailed engineering related questions? Talk about what we're asking for on the property. For a person who opened up by saying you want this project to happen on the property, I don't really — I don't really get that feeling, but maybe I'm mismisreading things. Douglas Loewer: If it means you can solve the sewage problem, that's my line of work, okay? If we're going to dump 9,000 gallons in the — in — in the subsoil, and we're not going to treat it, which is what he said, you're — we're going to have contaminated groundwater. Richard Yovanovich: It's going to meet the code requirements. We have to meet the code requirements. Douglas Loewer: Well, here — here — here's the question for you then. Richard Yovanovich: Okay. We'll go all night. Page 18 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Douglas Loewer: You all — the county approves all of this stuff and I will put in my two cents, so you will all be aware of what my concerns are. When it fails — because I have yet to be wrong on one of these in 40 years — and I've gotten many, many letters from towns that have — are going the direction you're going — it will be an apology letter down the line. I want to know who's going to — who's going to fix the contaminated groundwater? The county isn't. You all approve what they did. So, they're going to say, "The county approved it, so we did everything we had to do," and you'll end up with a Love Canal. Or a — or a Dundoff, like in this area, where it was okay to do it in the `60s and `70s, but now nobody's got to spend millions of dollars to clean it up. That water — that groundwater gets contaminated, I can tell you right now, when — when people start pumping the, uh — not only their domestic water — but they're going to pump that up on the sprinkler system and put e. coli right out on the ground. That's what happens when it gets contaminated. Now, who's going to pay for it? Richard Yovanovich: We — we don't agree with your comments, so can we just move on? We'll be here all night. Douglas Loewer: Well, just — I just want to know who's going to pay for it. Richard Yovanovich: Well, I'll worry about when and if that ever happens. Douglas Loewer: Is — is — is this Temple Shalom's problem? Richard Yovanovich: When and if that ever happens, we'll address that scenario. I'm not going to address it tonight. Douglas Loewer: Well, if it's anything like Dundoff, they were 30 years stuck discussing it. I'd like to know who is going — who is going to pay for it? Richard Yovanovich: Well, I'm telling you — Douglas Loewer: Because they're going to contaminate the groundwater. They're going to flood out the people on the other side of the street with their drainage. Richard Yovanovich: Yeah, I think we're done. I think we're done. I'm not going to keep going. I'm not answering the question, because I don't think it's going to happen, and we'll deal with it when and if it ever happens. So, can we move on and let other people speak? Page 19 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Douglas Loewer: Okay. And you're — then you're — then you're saying that I can't speak anymore? Richard Yovanovich: No, I'm — I'm just asking to — no sir. Give him back the mic. Douglas Loewer: That's fine. Richard Yovanovich: Do you have anymore land use related questions? Douglas Loewer: I'll see — when you say it's a judicial issue, I guess that's where you want me to go with it. Richard Yovanovich: Okay. Beverly Loewer: [Inaudible] [00:44:021 affect us. Wayne Arnold: If you're going to speak, Ma'am, I have to have you on the microphone. Sharon? You want to — Beverly Loewer: I said, [inaudible] Richard Yovanovich: State your name. Beverly Loewer: Beverly Loewer. If you have the groundwater — is not controlled, it's going to affect our property. Next, it's going to affect our septic — our well system. Wayne Arnold: Yes. Beverly Loewer: And I'm very concerned about that. Wayne Arnold: And we understand that, and that's why — Beverly Loewer: I don't have the details and the numbers, but I just know I don't want it to affect my property over there. Wayne Arnold: Well, we certainly don't want that either. Beverly Loewer: [Inaudible] awhile. Wayne Arnold: Anybody else have questions? Yes, sir. Sam Cadreau: Good evening. Sam Cadreau, I live directly across the street, uh, 4655 Pine Ridge. Um, I've got a couple of different concerns. Number one, there again with the — the groundwater — the — the Page 20 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Speakers: Sam Cadreau: Speakers: Sam Cadreau: Beverly Loewer: amount of occupancy for the building and you — you all have the luxury of being on city water. We don't. We don't. Right. The temple does. But we don't. Everyone else around here is on private wells. Yes. Sam Cadreau: So, I just want to make sure that everybody understands that. So, everything that comes off, whether even stormwater or drainage from the building, uh, sewage from the building goes into a private septic system for the temple and all the property. Now, my first question is if we were to build the same building on a piece of property to accommodate the building, the proper parking, and all that — that we would have an assembly in this building, how big of a piece of property would we have to have? Now, who can in the county answer that for me? Obviously, it would not be the size of that piece of property. It would be a lot larger. The reason it's getting by as being changed, because you've got a shared parking, and I understand. And a lot of people probably don't realize, but the question is why isn't that whole parking lot paved? Because the size of the property and the size of [inaudible] [00:46:351 water that needs to be retained on that piece of property — that's why that parking lot is not fully paved. Wayne Arnold: Can I — can I interrupt you to — Sam Cadreau: Yes, go ahead. Wayne Arnold: This is Wayne Arnold again. I didn't mean to cut you off, but the county has very specific requirements and actually allows grass parking for churches and other places of assembly because of the infrequent use of some of those parking spaces, and there are standards for that. So, that's why you already have grass parking on the site. It wasn't because we're trying to overdevelop it and we need it. The county actually will make us utilize some of that as impervious area anyway, even if it's grass. Sam Cadreau: Right. And I understand that, but I'm — that's what I'm saying though, that if we were to build this same building on a piece of Page 21 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM property, how large of a piece of property would it have to be to accommodate the building and the proper parking for that building? Wayne Arnold: I don't think we've done that analysis to know a — a specific answer to your question. Sam Cadreau: What you — what is being presented is because we're doing that shared parking. That's a lot. Okay. Wayne Arnold: Yes, sir. And that is — that's — that's part of the — the concept of their campus and that's why it's a good fit for the Federation and the temple to share those facilities. Sam Cadreau: Now, two other — two other concerns. My basic — when I started my first job in high school doing six years of land survey, so I know how to look at a piece of land and I know how to look at deeds and properties. If everybody will look on the screen and look at the yellow line that encompasses the property that the temple owns. Why is that piece of property — that line up there on Pine Ridge Road, which we all legally own to the center of the road, even though there's 75 foot right of way — it jogs down on part of the parking lot and encompasses across the whole piece of property in question that the temple does not even own. I have the deeds right here in my hand that other people own that property. When you make that access, you're making an access across a piece of prior private property, even though it's a right of way, as the county right of way. Wayne Arnold: Can I answer your question? Sam Cadreau: Sure. Wayne Arnold: Because I — I do know the answer to this. Um, the title work that was prepared for this property demonstrates that even though those were under alternate access points, they were given right of way for Pine Ridge expansion, so it actually is under the control of Collier County and will have the ability to access the county right of way. So, it was part of the right of way taking, yes. Sam Cadreau: Okay, so you can right of way even though there is a deed for that property that — that they're — you're crossing? Wayne Arnold: Yes, sir. Sam Cadreau: Okay. All right. Just wanted to clarify that. Um, another major factor Page 22 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM — and I'm going to — I hate to say it, but I'm a — I'm going to throw the traffic engineer under the bus right here. Okay? I spent 25 years with the City of Naples Fire Department. I have worked accidents left and right. I live directly across the street. I know when there's an accident in front of this entrance every time it happens, unless I'm out of town or we're on duty. Okay? Um, to — to dispute your idea of a right turn second access coming out, and like the other gentleman said, having to cross lanes and then make a U-turn up to go back west, it is really pushing the limit for the traffic. If you really want this project, it really needs to be pushed seriously to have to have a traffic light. And I think that this other prior meeting, that members of the church and members of the Federation were 100% behind that, because it's too dangerous. I've seen too many accidents out there. Uh, we have to do a U-turn in the median to get back to our driveway in a road that's doing 50mph, posted speed limit. And they're not doing 50, they're doing 60, okay? It's too dangerous. This project— if you're going deal with this project, you need a traffic light. You need the safety built into this, because it's just way too dangerous. There have been too many accidents out there. I don't know the exact numbers, but I think you know that I can a phone call down to the sheriff's office, because I know [inaudible] [00:50:50] Randolph personally, and I could have that in about 10 minutes. Okay? But this needs to be considered highly before this project even goes. And to go back on also with the county, the church is looking to rezone this property, which is now a zone residential. You're going to go through a process to zone it to multi -use for a church. Understand. But all the answers haven't been given, and all the problems haven't been solved, but yet, if it doesn't pass, then that property's going to be zoned back commercial. Then they're going to be sitting on it. What're they going to do? Wayne Arnold: If — if I just clarify that. If — if this would not be approved, the lands that we're talking about largely — the four and half acres that are undeveloped today will remain zoned estates and would allow only estate zoned uses. They would not allow the church uses on it without going through the same process again. Sam Cadreau: So, that would — okay — let — let — okay, let me clarify. If we go through the rezoning — to get the rezoning to be able to provisional use for church — Page 23 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Wayne Arnold: We're asking for it to be a permitted use, not a provisional use. Sam Cadreau: Okay, permitted. Okay. Wayne Arnold: Yes. Mm-hmm. Sam Cadreau: So, it gets rezoned as that. But then, as the rest of the procedure goes through and the county commissioners do not approve the overall building of the building and the site management and all, is that property still going to be under provisional use, or will it automatically go back to the residential use as well? Wayne Arnold: Well, right now, the portion that we're sitting in today that's been developed for the parking, the childcare, and the sanctuary are all, uh, provisional use, not conditional use. Sam Cadreau: Right. I understand. Wayne Arnold: So, that's how they approved under the Golden Gate master plan. We're asking to rezone the entire campus to a planned unit development to allow this use and the Federation uses on the site consistent with the — the uses that I've gone over and those that Rich read into the record. Sam Cadreau: Okay. Wayne Arnold: So, if we get that approved, that's what we're approved for. Sam Cadreau: Okay. Wayne Arnold: If we don't get that approved, then the temple is left with exactly what is has today. Sam Cadreau: I understand. I understand that whole part. Wayne Arnold: Okay. Sam Cadreau: What I'm understand about the four and a half extra acres that you're looking at — at rezoning from residential to provisional use, if they get changed to provisional use and the whole plan does not go through — the whole plan just tanks — the temple's still going to have their original property — understand — they'll still own the western four and a half acres. But it's residential now. They could turn around and sell it off as residential property and get of that property. So, if it gets rezoned as provisional use, the whole plan tanks and it doesn't go anywhere, is it still going to stay provisional use Page 24 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM property? Or will it revert back to residential at that point? Wayne Arnold: Well — well, the term is planned unit development, not provisional use, just to be clear, but yes, once it's rezoned, the PUD — it is a PUD — it's no longer zoned estates. Sam Cadreau: So, they — they would have to go back and forth — in order to sell it later on, they would have to go back for another rezoning of it back to residential? Wayne Arnold: That is correct. Female Speaker 1: Or we come up with another plan. Sam Cadreau: Okay. Wayne Arnold: Yeah, you would either go through and rezone it or amend this zoning to allow some alternate use. Sam Cadreau: That's why — that's why — I understand what this gentleman was saying about having some answers before we go into looking into rezoning some property, because it's a procedure. You're rezoning this, and then all of a sudden, you can't use it for what you wanted to use it for, being rezoned, so what are you going to do with it? Understand where I'm going? Wayne Arnold: I do, but if they can't use for it what they're intending, it would remain vacant. Sam Cadreau: Right. Right. Wayne Arnold: That's the answer. Female Speaker 1: [Inaudible] [00:54:26] [Phone rings] Wayne Arnold: Jimmy. Sam Cadreau: Okay. Understand. Thank you very much. Wayne Arnold: Okay. Thank you. Anybody else? Ladies? Want to — no? Female Speaker 2: Um, I just agree with him with the traffic thing. I really do. Wayne Arnold: Okay. Noted. Anybody else have a question? Comment? Yes, Page 25 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM ma'am? Female Speaker 3: [Inaudible] [00:54:42] Wayne Arnold: Hang on. One at a time, please. This lady's — Female Speaker 3: They said with the traffic light situation was turned down. Diana Cadreau: I know an officer — my name is Diana Cadreau and I live right across from the temple. [inaudible] in agreement with the project getting through. We're a little concerned with the size of the 22,000 square foot building, as well as the number of individuals that will be using this building and the social functions. I think that's all that we're very concerned about. Um, and what we're also very concerned about the — the entrance and the — and the exits. The one or maybe the proposed second entrance. Um, again, this is a very dangerous area in the road again with the speed. Again, we see multiple accidents as it spans as it now. My thought is if we did change the main entrance and exit to be further down, uh, what are your thoughts on that? Wayne Arnold: Are you suggesting farther to the west for the access point, closer to the second access point we're showing? Diana Cadreau: Yes. Wayne Arnold: I'll — I'll let Jim try to answer that. The county has access space and criteria between driveways, so I'm not sure we have an opportunity to shift both access points farther to the west, but I'll let Jim answer that — try to. Jim Banks: Uh, this is Jim Banks again. I — yeah, we met with the county. There is no option move that full access further to the west. As you can see on the area that's already a full access to the, uh, lowering in front from the existing property, uh, which we can align up with. And there's also another full access further to the west from there. And Collier County has specific, um, access spacing requirements, and currently this doesn't even meet their current standards. So, we certainly could not shift that access any further to the west. We would be in full violation of their intersection separation criteria. Diana Cadreau: How did it initially get approved that — that we're already in violation? Jim Banks: The access points are already there. And this — this access would be Page 26 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM the one that would be considered in violation, so if any access got closed, it would this one right here. Wayne Arnold: He — he's referring to the county median, not the driveway connection to our site. Jim Banks: Yeah. The driveway — yeah — the median opening. You see this existing median opening? This is one does not meet the separation standards for the Temple Shalom full access. So, if one was to be closed, it would be this one right here. That's why we didn't even attempt to line up with — because it would be closed. Diana Cadreau: Okay. Wayne Arnold: Thanks Jim. Anybody else? Before we — yes, ma'am? Janet Lee: Yeah, um, I — Wayne Arnold: You need to be on the microphone if you're going to speak. We have to capture the comments on the record, please. Janet Lee: My concern is how do I cross the street? Female Speaker 2: Name? Janet Lee: My name's Janet Lee. Female Speaker 2: Thank you. Janet Lee: You're welcome. And the thing is, like Sam said, we have had a lot of accidents, just you people coming out. I'm not saying you as in — but there has been. Um, one of the accidents actually, the man got mad because he hit a motorcycle and he was a kid down the street and was upset because he said "He hit my bumper off." That is exactly what he said and I couldn't believe it and the kid's lying in the ditch. Um, the county needs to do — look at the traffic on this road and take into consideration you and everybody else coming in and out. Wayne Arnold: Yes, and they will. This is Wayne Arnold again. They certainly will. That's part of their analysis on looking at our proposed locations to make sure they're going to meet those spacing criteria. Janet Lee: Or reduce the speed. Yeah. We need the speed limit — Wayne Arnold: Yeah. That's something that — Page 27 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Jim Banks: Yes. Wayne Arnold: — that we can't control — the speed, but certainly that's something — Janet Lee: I feel if you drive this every day — Wayne Arnold: I don't drive it every day and I'm sure you do. Yeah, you live here, and I don't. I get that. Janet Lee: It's — it's terrific. It's awful getting out and it's awful getting back into, and I've been here for four years. Wayne Arnold: Understood. Understand your concerns. Beverly Loewer: [Inaudible] [00:59:041 Wayne Arnold: Anybody else have a comment? Anybody else? Beverly Loewer: I said, I'm really pissed [inaudible] all the traffic was backed up [inaudible] get into the parking lot. Do you know what I'm talking about? Last week? Wayne Arnold: I didn't experience it. Debra's back here nodding her head because, you know, she obviously hosted the event here at the temple. So — but understood. Douglas Loewer: I have — I have one further question. Here, uh, you list on the site that gets us into the county that this meeting is going to be — is the only one you're holding for this and the other one you're, uh, processing. Wayne Arnold: That's correct. We're jointly conducting the comp plan meeting and the zoning meeting. That's what this is about. Douglas Loewer: So, I don't have an opportunity at another meeting to discuss these things on site for the other — for the other half of the project where it gets to design, because you've jammed both of them together here. That correct? Wayne Arnold: No, well it makes sense to combine them. The comp plan language and the zoning go hand in hand — Douglas Loewer: So, you then you aren't going to — you aren't going to hear what I have to say about drainage and septic on this one. Page 28 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Wayne Arnold: Well, Mr. Loewer, I — I don't want to get to get into a debate either Douglas Loewer: Then — then when are you going to hear it? Wayne Arnold: We've had dialogue with you and then we've got extensive emails. We're in the process of trying to get additional testing done. Michael's looking at other site design opportunities. We're trying to address all of your concerns. This is just very early in the process for what — Douglas Loewer: Well, then why — then why is this the only informational meeting? Wayne Arnold: What I said is this is the only county -required meeting. The county by nature requires us — Douglas Loewer: Well, I don't have trouble for — for this one — Wayne Arnold: And — and I think as — Douglas Loewer: — and for the one for the design, I don't know how you can list this for that? For the second one. Wayne Arnold: Well, the site design process is not a public process. It's an engineering review, because it's — it's based on all the codes and standards you have to design — Douglas Loewer: So, any concerns anybody has about any of the other items out here don't matter. Wayne Arnold: No, I didn't say that. Douglas Loewer: Because you — because you're having — you're having an informational meeting on basically the site design, uh, before you've done the site design, and you won't even let me talk about it because you're talking about the other project first. Wayne Arnold: Well, and I think this is not the site — Douglas Loewer: I'm going to be standing before the county commissioners. Wayne Arnold: That's okay. Those are public hearings and — Douglas Loewer: Because I don't — I — I think — I think everybody at least gets to talk on — on — on the second issue. Even if you get the rezoning approved, you're saying — yeah, there has to no more informational meetings. Page 29 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Wayne Arnold: The county requires us to have informational meetings as part of the zoning process that we're going through now. They do not require those meetings when we get to the engineering site review. Those are conducted by — Douglas Loewer: So then, why is it listed on both of the two? Wayne Arnold: I'm not sure I understand. Douglas Loewer: On the county document, you've listed this as — you're — you're trying to get two things approved. Wayne Arnold: Yes. A conference in plan amendment and a PUD rezoning. Douglas Loewer: And you're — you're saying that this — this is the only informational meeting with the — where this is going to go on — Wayne Arnold: I said this is the only — Douglas Loewer: — until — until the place gets — until after the place is built. Wayne Arnold: It's — it's the only code -required meeting. Mr. Loewer, we invited you and other neighbors to a very informal meeting before we even submitted application materials. We're happy to continue dialoguing with you or any of the other neighbors that have issues. Douglas Loewer: Yeah, but you just don't want to hear them. Wayne Arnold: This is not — Douglas Loewer: You don't want to hear the issues. Wayne Arnold: Mr. Loewer, this is not the forum, as Mr. Yovanovich mentioned, to deal with site specific development issues. There's another set of codes and regulations that we deal with. Douglas Loewer: Well, very basically, when it fails, I want to know who's responsible. Wayne Arnold: Mr. Loewer, [inaudible] [01:02:431 on the record. Douglas Loewer: I want to know who's responsible. Basically, when it fails, I want to know who's responsible. Who's going to pay for it? Wayne Arnold: Got it. Thank you. If there are no other comments or questions, I'm Page 30 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM going to go ahead and close the meeting and appreciate everybody taking their time to come out. Douglas Loewer: It is going to fail. Wayne Arnold: And if you have notice for this meeting, you'll get notice for when we get to public hearings to, um, deal with the planning commission and the board of county commissioners. And that'll be a couple different step process of public hearings, but you'll get notice for that and there will be signs posted on the properties. I'm sure you've seen for other projects around the county, so with that good night and thank you. Male Speaker 1: Thank you. [End of Audio] Duration: 64 minutes Page 31 of 31