The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 10/27/2020 Item #17D (PL20180002374)17.D 10/27/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) zoning district to allow up to 20,000 square feet of commercial development for property located at the northwest corner of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) and Greenway Road, in Sections 12 and 13, Township 51 South, Range 26, East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 2.81+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [PL20180002374] (This is a companion to Agenda Item 17.C) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above -referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property consists of 2.81f acres and is located at the northwest corner of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) and Greenway Road, in Sections 12 and 13, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The applicant is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to amend Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) zoning district for the development of an approximately 5,000 square -foot convenience store and 19 refueling stations (16 unleaded refueling positions and 3 diesel refueling positions) as well as a carwash. FISCAL IMPACT: The Rezone (RZ) by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build -out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the RZ is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The undeveloped subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, and within the Coastal High Hazard Area, as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. The subject site abuts the Rural Fringe Packet Pg. 1952 17.D 10/27/2020 Mixed -Use District Receiving Area to the east (across Greenway Road.) The Urban designated area accommodates residential uses and a variety of non-residential uses, including commercial uses modifying locational criteria. This site does not qualify for a rezone to a commercial zoning district. Therefore, the applicant has submitted a small-scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) application to create the Greenway-Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict for the purpose of providing small-scale shopping and convenience commercial uses to the surrounding neighborhood within convenient travel distance and to serve the public traveling on East Tamiami Trail (US 41). The companion GMPA (PL20180002507) must be approved in order to rezone the subject parcel to C-3 and be consistent with the GMP (see Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Review) GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land -use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. The proposed rezone petition is inconsistent with the GMP, unless the Board approves the companion GMPA first or concurrent with the rezone petition and the uses and intensities align. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPQ RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition RZ-PL20180002374 on September 25, 2020, and by a vote of 6 to 0 recommended to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval with the following conditions of approval: 1. The developer(s), it successors(s) in title, or assignee(s), will be responsible for the proportionate cost of a traffic signal at U.S. 41 and Greenway Road when determined warranted and approved by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) or Collier County. The proportionate share payment shall be based on the percentage of project -related trips impacting the intersection and shall be paid to the entity that permits and constructs said signal. Documentation of the payment shall be sent to the County for monitoring purposes. Upon the completion of the installation, inspection, burn -in period, and final approval/acceptance of a traffic signal said traffic signal will be turned over to FDOT or Collier County for operations and maintenance. 2. The maximum allowable commercial intensity shall be 20,000 square feet. 3. The maximum total daily trip generation for the property shall not exceed 134 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The petitioner is requesting a rezone from the Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to the Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) Zoning District. The attached staff report and recommendations of the Planning Commission required are advisory only and are not binding on you. All testimony given must be under oath. The Petitioner has the burden to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below, and you may question Petitioner, or staff, to satisfy yourself that the necessary criteria have been satisfied. Should you consider denying the rezone, to assure that that your decision is not later found to be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable, the denial must be based upon competent, substantial evidence that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for Straight Rezones Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? Packet Pg. 1953 17.D 10/27/2020 2. Will the proposed rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 3. Would the proposed rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 4. Are the existing district boundaries illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change? Do changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary? Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 10. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 11. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 12. Will the proposed change constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare? 13. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning? 14. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County? 15. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 16. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 17. What is the impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.11], as amended? 18. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to this rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? Packet Pg. 1954 17.D 10/27/2020 This item has been approved as to form and legality, and it requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval - HFAC. RECOMMENDATION: If the Board approves the companion GMP amendment, then staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC, which is reflected in the attached Ordinance and recommends that the Board approve the applicant's request to rezone to the C-3 zoning district. Prepared by: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. 7-Eleven Greenway Naples Rezone Staff Report (PDF) 2. Attachment A - Revised Proposed Ordinance 10-7-20 (PDF) 3. Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Review (PDF) 4. [Linked] Attachment C - Application -Backup Materials (PDF) 5. Attachment D - Public Hearing Sign (PDF) 6. Attachment E - September 4, 2020 Letter - Fiddlers Creek Community Development Districts 1 and 2 (PDF) 7. Attachment F - Hybrid Meeting Waiver (PDF) 8. legal ad - agenda IDs 13366 & 13081 (PDF) Packet Pg. 1955 17.D 10/27/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.13 Doe ID: 13081 Item Summary: This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) zoning district to allow up to 20,000 square feet of commercial development for property located at the northwest corner of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) and Greenway Road, in Sections 12 and 13, Township 51 South, Range 26, East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 2.81+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [PL20180002374] (This is a companion to Agenda Item 17.C) Meeting Date: 10/27/2020 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Tim Finn 10/05/2020 9:03 AM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning — Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 10/05/2020 9:03 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Zoning Zoning Growth Management Department Growth Management Department County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget Budget and Management Office County Attorney's Office County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Judy Puig Level 1 Reviewer Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Anita Jenkins Additional Reviewer Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review James C French Deputy Department Head Review Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending Completed 10/05/2020 4:47 PM Completed 10/06/2020 10:54 AM Completed 10/07/2020 3:12 PM Completed 10/07/2020 4:13 PM Completed 10/09/2020 3:03 PM Completed 10/13/2020 8:55 AM Completed 10/13/2020 9:18 AM Completed 10/13/2020 10:30 AM Completed 10/14/2020 2:06 PM Completed 10/19/2020 3:14 PM 10/27/2020 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 1956 17.D.1 CoffieT CO-Uftty 0WWW%"-- _ mwmft. STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 SUBJECT: RZ-PL20180002374; 7-ELEVEN GREENWAY NAPLES COMPANION ITEM: PL20180002507/CPSS-2019-8 as as Owner: w ti William B. Yeomans, Jr. oo TBC Greenway, LLC M 13920 58th St. N., Suite 1014 Clearwater, FL 33760 0 Agents: Al Quattrone, P.E. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Jeff Wright, Land Attorney Quattrone & Associates, Inc. Hole Montes, Inc. Henderson, Franklin, 4301 Veronica Shoemaker Blvd. 950 Encore Way Starnes & Holt. PA Fort Myers, FL 33916 Naples, FL 34110 8889 Pelican Bay Boulevard, Suite 400 Naples, FL 34108 REOUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to amend Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) zoning district. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consists of 2.81± acres and is located at the northwest corner of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) and Greenway Road, in Sections 12 and 13, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (see location map, page 2). RZ-PL20180002374; 7-Eleven Greenway Naples Page 1 of 10 Revised: September 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 1957 ((ZN) saldeN Aennu00aE) UOA013-L : L80£O :podel1 }}e;g euozeN saldeN Aennu00aE) uanal3-L :;uauayoeUV 00 G rn T T fa - I ® cn J � � LL CIi O Q �¢T- fj A U r RZ-PL20180002374; 7-Eleven Greenway Naples Revised: September 9, 2020 CV 0 C) C) co r C) CV J L z 0 �1 � 0 I - CL ca 0 -b-I /� V 0 J Page 2 of 10 17.D.1 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The approximate 2.8-acre subject property is currently zoned Agricultural (A). The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject site to Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) to permit a development of an approximately 5,000 square foot convenience store and 19 refueling stations (16 unleaded refueling positions and 3 diesel refueling positions) as well as a carwash. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Mostly undeveloped with sparse single-family residential, zoned Agriculture (A) South: Tamiami Trail East (six -lane arterial), then developed single-family residential, zoned Marco Shores/Fiddler's Creek PUD East: Greenway Road (local road), then undeveloped land zoned Agriculture (A) and to the south zoned Travel -Trailer Recreational Vehicle Campground (TTRVC) West: Undeveloped, zoned Agriculture (A) Aerial Map (County GIS) RZ-PL20180002374; 7-Eleven Greenway Naples Page 3 of 10 Revised: September 9, 2020 T oo 0 M Packet Pg. 1959 17.D.1 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The undeveloped subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, and within the Coastal High Hazard Area, as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. The subject site abuts the Rural Fringe Receiving Area to the east (across Greenway Road.) The Urban designated area accommodates residential uses and a variety of non-residential uses, including commercial uses modifying locational criteria. This site does not qualify for a rezone to 0 a commercial zoning district. The applicant has submitted a small-scale Growth Management Plan z Amendment (GMPA) application to create the Greenway-Tamiami Trail East Commercial 3 Subdistrict for the purpose of providing small-scale shopping and convenience commercial uses to the surrounding neighborhood within convenient travel distance and to serve the public traveling on East Tamiami Trail (US 41). The companion GMPA (PL20180002507) must be approved in order to rezone the subject parcel to C-3 and be consistent with the GMP. This petition cannot be approved until this companion GMPA is adopted and goes into effect and the PUD ordinance w needs to provide for the effective date to be linked to the effective date of the companion GMP amendment petition. (see Attachment B — FLUE Consistency Review) oo M Transportation Element: The project is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan, which states, 2 "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, andproposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five-year AUIR planning period unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and C. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " According to the Transportation Impact Statement (TIS) dated June 5, 2020 (revised), provided with this petition; the proposed 7-Eleven Convenience Store with Gas Facility will generate an additional projected total of +/-134 PM peak hour two-way trips on the following roadway segments with the listed capacities according to the current 2019 AUIR: RZ-PL20180002374; 7-Eleven Greenway Naples Page 4 of 10 Revised: September 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 1960 17.D.1 Roadway Link Current 2019 2019 Peak Hour AUIR AUIR Peak LOS Remaining Capacity Direction Service Volume/Peak Direction Tamiami Trail East Joseph Lane to 2,000/East C 682 (US-41) Greenway Road Tamiami Trail East Greenway Road to 1,800/West F* (120) (US-41) San Marco Drive *The proposed development has a de minimis (less than 1%) impact on this road segment, therefore it is an existing background deficiency. FDOT and Collier County continue to monitor c� this segment of US-41. Based on the 2019 AUIR, the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed new trips for this development within the 5-year planning period (as noted above). w ti Therefore, the subject Rezone can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation r Element of the Growth Management Plan with the following condition of approval: c M Recommended condition of approval: The developer, their successors or assigns, shall pay c fair share costs of a future signal at Tamiami Trail East (US-41) and Greenway Road C should FDOT determine the signal meets warrants and is required. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental staff has evaluated the petition. The property is 2.81 acres; the project has been found consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the CCME. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including Section 10.02.08.17, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. Drainage: The proposed rezone request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage will be addressed through the environmental resource permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will also evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of site development plan (SDP) and/or platting (PPL). Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. The site contains approximately +1.62 acres of native vegetation, which equates to a preserve requirement of 0.162 acres (1.62 x 10% = 0.162). There were no observed listed species on the property. RZ-PL20180002374; 7-Eleven Greenway Naples Page 5 of 10 Revised: September 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 1961 17.D.1 Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this development with the above -noted condition of approval. Landscape Review: The conceptual site plan provided demonstrates that the code required buffer widths can be provided. The 30' wide buffer along Greenway Rd. will be required to be within the property. This buffer is depicted within the right of way on the conceptual site plan, but the plans show that the 30' wide buffer can be provided within the property along the eastern boundary. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water and south wastewater service areas of the Collier County Water -Sewer District. Water and wastewater services are readily available via existing infrastructure along the project's frontage on Greenway Road. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available Zoning Services Review: This rezone petition currently has a companion small scale growth management plan amendment (SSGMPA) via (PL20180002507) which will establish the 2.81- acre Greenway- Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict. The Subdistrict is intended to provide small-scale shopping and commercial uses to the surrounding neighborhood within convenient travel distance and to serve the public traveling on East Tamiami Trail (US 41), by allowing permitted uses in the C-3 zoning district (Proposed subdistrict language italicized below). "IS. Greenway - Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict The Greenway - Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict consists of ± 2.81 acres and is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Tamiami Trail East and Greenway Road, in Section 12, Township, SI south, Range 27 east. The purpose of the Subdistrict is to provide small-scale shopping and convenience commercial uses to the surrounding neighborhood within convenient travel distance and to serve the public traveling on East Tamiami Trail (US 41). The development of this Subdistrict shall comply with the following restrictions, limitations, and standards: a. Allowable uses are those permitted by right in the C-3, Commercial Intermediate zoning district, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. The maximum allowable commercial intensity shall be 20,000 square feet. " The subject property is located diagonally across the Tamiami Trail East (US 41) from a commercial tract in the Fiddlers Creek PUD (designated "B" — Business/Commercial on the on the Fiddler's Creek Master Plan - Ordinance 18-27). This commercial area within Fiddler's basically allows C-3 uses and would be compatible with the proposed Greenway - Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict which would allow for the proposed C-3 uses and the gas station with a convenience store. The approval of this SSGMPA is consistent with State statutes regulating comprehensive plan amendments and it is consistent with applicable GMP policies related to the same. Assuming the SSGMPA is approved, then the proposed rezone to C-3 may also be deemed consistent. REZONE FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners ... shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to RZ-PL20180002374; 7-Eleven Greenway Naples Page 6 of 10 Revised: September 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 1962 17.D.1 the following when applicable." (Zoning Division staff responses in non -bold): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff has determined the petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. (subject to approval of the companion GMPA) 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern related to surrounding properties is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this report. The proposed uses will not change the existing land use patterns in the area. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The rezone will not create an isolated district to adjacent and nearby districts. The intent of the proposed C-3 zoning district is to provide small-scale shopping and commercial uses to the surrounding neighborhoods and to serve the public traveling on US 41. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing o conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing district boundaries are logically drawn. There are no boundary changes proposed. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of theproposed rezoning necessary. Changing conditions do not make the passage of the proposed rezone necessary. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Development will meet site design standards set by the LDC. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed development at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. The project's development must also comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations and operational RZ-PL20180002374; 7-Eleven Greenway Naples Page 7 of 10 Revised: September 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 1963 17.D.1 improvements when development approvals are sought at the time of Site Development Plan (SDP) review. Ingress and egress to the subject property will utilize access locations on Tamiami Trail East and Greenway Road. Additional operational impacts for the facility will be reviewed at the time of Site Development Plan (SDP). The TIS submitted by the applicant indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period as noted above and not adversely impact further the surrounding roadway network. & Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. It is not anticipated that the rezone request to C-3 will create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage for this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County environmental staff will evaluate the stormwater management system and design criteria at the time of SDP or PPL. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. T- oo The proposed rezone from A to C-3 would not reduce light or air to adjacent areas. M Tmm Development will meet the site design standards set by the LDC. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. Property value is affected by many factors. It is driven by market conditions and is generally a subjective determination. Zoning alone is not likely to adversely affect property values. Generally, market conditions prevail. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Staff does not anticipate the rezoning would be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed rezone, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. RZ-PL20180002374; 7-Eleven Greenway Naples Page 8 of 10 Revised: September 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 1964 17.D.1 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. There are no substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with the existing zoning; however, with frontage on US41, the existing zoning does not result in the highest and best use for the property. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff s position that the proposed rezoning to C-3 is not out of scale with the needs of the community or the County. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. T 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which M would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any future development anticipated by the rezoning would require an extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The activity proposed by this amendment will have no adverse impact on public utilities facility adequacy. M Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on June 30, 2020, 5:30 PM, at New Hope Ministries, Lecture Hall — Room 211, located at 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, FL. No members of the public were in attendance. Bob Mulhere (agent) gave a PowerPoint presentation for county staff in attendance RZ-PL20180002374; 7-Eleven Greenway Naples Page 9 of 10 Revised: September 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 1965 17.D.1 and for audio and video purposes. For further information, please see the NIM Summary information in the back-up material. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report for content and legality on September 2, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Division staff recommends the CCPC forward petition RZ-PL20180002374 — 7-Eleven Greenway Naples to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for approval, subject to the following conditions: T 1. The developer, their successors or assigns, shall pay fair share costs of a future signal at Tamiami M Trail East (US-41) and Greenway Road should FDOT determine the signal meets warrants and is required. 2. The maximum allowable commercial intensity shall be 20,000 square feet. Attachments: A) Proposed Ordinance B) FLUE Consistency Review C) Application/Back up materials RZ-PL20180002374; 7-Eleven Greenway Naples Page 10 of 10 Revised: September 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 1966 17.D.2 ORDINANCE NO.20- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A COMMERCIAL INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT (C-3) ZONING DISTRICT TO ALLOW UP TO 20,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (US 41) AND GREENWAY ROAD, IN SECTIONS 12 AND 13, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26, EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 2.81+1- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20180002374] WHEREAS, Robert 7, Mulhere, FAICP, of Hole Montes, Inc. and Al Quattrone PE of Quattrone & Associates, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property more particularly described in Exhibit A, located in Sections 12 and 13, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) Zoning District to allow up to 20,000 square feet of commercial development for a 2.81+1- acre project, subject to the conditions shown in Exhibit B. Exhibits A and B are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The appropriate [l9-CPS-01941/156961111]108 7-Eleven Greenway Naples 1 PL20180002374 1015120 Page ] of 2 Packet Pg. 1967 17.D.2 zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. 2020- becomes effective. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2020. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK ma , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko 1[[ Managing Assistant County Attorney Exhibit A: Legal Description Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval Exhibit C: Location Map [ l9-CPS-01941/1569611/11108 7-Eleven Greenway Naples 1 PL20180002374 1015120 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Page 2 of 2 Burt L. Saunders, Chairman Packet Pg. 1968 17.D.2 EXHIBIT "A" Description: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Section 13, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida (said corner also being the Southeast corner of Section 12)- Thence along the East line of said Section 13, S 0°19'37" W 336.19 feet to the Northerly right of way line of US-41 (State Road 90); thence along said right of way line N 54°18'59" W 484.26 feet; thence N 35°41'01" E 400.00 feet; thence S 54°18'59" E 200.00 feet to the East line of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; thence along the East line of Section 12, S 0°11'20" W 154.53 feet to the Place of Beginning, and being a part of the Northeast 114 of said Section 13 and part of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 12, LESS the East Thirty -feet (30') thereof conveyed to Collier County by virtue of Quit Claim Deed recorded in Official Records Book 1050, page 196, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Parcel Identification Number: 00737560004 Packet Pg. 1969 17.D.2 Exhibit B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The developer(s), its successors(s) in title, or assignees), will be responsible for the proportionate cost of a traffic signal at U.S. 41 and Greenway Road, when determined warranted and approved by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) or Collier County. The proportionate share payment shall be based on the percentage of project related trips impacting the intersection and shall be paid to the entity that permits and constructs said signal. Documentation of the payment shall be sent to the County for monitoring purposes. Upon the completion of the installation, inspection, burn -in period and final approval/acceptance of a traffic signal, said traffic signal will be turned over to FDOT or Collier County for operations and maintenance. 2. The maximum allowable commercial intensity shall be 20,000 square feet. 3. The maximum total daily trip generation for the property shall not exceed 134 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDPISDPA or subdivision plat approval. [ 19-CPS-019411156961211 ] 109 Packet Pg. 1970 950 Encore Way Imm Naples, FL 34110 HOLE MONTES P E Phone: (239) 254-2000 Exhibit C 7-Eleven Greenway Naples Rezone Packet Pg. 1971 17.D.3 Co�r �ouHty Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: Tim Finn, AICP, Principal Planner Zoning Services Section, Zoning Division W From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner w d Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division Z Date: July 2, 2020 3 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review c ,L^ V PETITION NUMBER: Rezone (RZ)) - PL20180002374 - REV 5 m PETITION NAME: 7-Eleven Greenway Naples w REQUEST: The application is requesting to rezone the subject parcel from A, Rural/Agricultural Zoning District to C-3 Commercial Intermediate Zoning District. Submittal 2 revised the Conceptual Site Plan, the Public Utilities calculations and TIS. Submittal 3 revised the Statement of Utility Provision form, and the Master Plan, a revised �Q v Application, a revised Site Plan, a revised Affidavit of Representations, a revised Survey, and a new exhibit showing 3 the closest gas station to the proposed site. Submittal 4 included a legal description (Exhibit A) in response to the 2 County Attorney's request and an accompanying Address Checklist. Submittal 5 revised the TIS and shows no more W than a de minimus impact. c LOCATION: The f2.81-acre site is at the northwest corner of Tamiami East Trail (US41) and Greenway Road, N approximately 3.37 miles east of Collier Blvd. (CR951), in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East. 0 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The undeveloped subject property is designated Urban, Urban V LU Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict and within the Coastal High Hazard Area, as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. The subject site abuts the Rural Fringe Receiving Area to U_ the east (across Greenway Road.) o0 r The Urban designated area accommodates residential uses and a variety of non-residential uses, including commercial E uses modifying locational criteria. This site does not qualify for a rezone to a commercial zoning district. The z applicant has submitted a small-scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) application to create the Greenway-Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict for the purpose of providing small-scale shopping and Q convenience commercial uses to the surrounding neighborhood within convenient travel distance and to serve the public traveling on East Tamiami Trail (US 41). The companion GMPA (PL20180002507) must be approved in order to rezone the subject parcel to C-3 and be consistent with the GMP. This petition cannot be approved until this companion GMPA is adopted and goes into effect and the PUD ordinance needs to provide for the effective date M to be linked to the effective date of the companion GMP amendment petition. Q In reviewing for compliance with Policy 5.6 (shown in italics below) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) staff provides the following analysis in [bracketed bold text.] FLUE Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning staff as part of their review Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 .239-252-2400 Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 1972 17.D.3 of the petition in its entirety. Staff recommends to zoning staff that they consider the following: 1) the subject site's proximity to residential land uses to the north and northwest of the site are within 500 feet, 2) the distance to another commercial site already operating provides convenience shopping and gasoline (just over 1/2 mile to the west on Tamiami Trail), and 3) that the FLUE designation for land adjacent to the east side of Greenway Road is Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Receiving Lands.] In reviewing for compliance with FLUE Objective 7 and related Policies (shown in italics), staff provides the following analysis in [bracketed bold text]. FLUE Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The `Conceptual Site Plan' document in the petition packet depicts frontage on Tamiami Trail East (US41), a principal arterial (urban and rural), with an ingress/egress to US41 that is located at the southwest corner of the subject site. According to the submitted `Conceptual Site Plan,' two additional ingress/egress points will be located on Greenway Road, a local roadway that acts as a collector road. The Traffic Impact Study also shows the same three access points.] FLUE Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [`Conceptual Site Plan' shows what appears to be a sketch showing a `traffic pattern' looping around the outskirts of the entire site. Since this is a small f2.81-acre site, the circular `traffic pattern' is unlikely to help reduce vehicle congestion on the nearby arterial and local roads or eliminate the need for a traffic signal.] FLUE Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The o interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. M r [`Conceptual Site Plan' indicates a vehicular interconnection point with the adjoining undeveloped parcel zoned `A' Rural/Agricultural District to the west. An email from FDOT's SWFL office was included with the TIS stating that although there is not adequate frontage to obtain an access point, the applicant could achieve an access point on US 41 at the southwest corner of the proposed site, if the applicant were to share that access with the parcel to the west — therefore creating a shared access point. Staff encourages this future interconnection to the west as shown on the `Conceptual Site Plan.' Staff agrees that an interconnection to the; developed parcel zoned `A' to the north will not support an interconnection. Tamiami Trail East is to the south of the parcel and Greenway Road is to the east of the subject site.] c FLUE Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [There is an existing sidewalk on Tamiami Trail East (US41). The proposed commercial development is for small-scale shopping and convenience commercial uses. No blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities, or range of housing prices and types would apply to this development. Sidewalks will be required per the LDC.] CONCLUSION Based on the above analysis, staff finds the subject petition not consistent with Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan, however, once the following stipulations have been met, it may be found consistent: 1. This petition may only be deemed consistent with the FLUE if the companion GMP amendment petition (PL20180002507/CPSS-2019-8) is adopted and goes into effect and all uses and standards in the GMPA are reflected in the PUD. 2. The PUD Ordinance needs to provide for the effective date to be linked to the effective date of the companion GMP amendment petition. cc: Anita Jenkins, AICP, Community Planning Manager, Zoning Division Raymond V. Bellows, Manager, Zoning Services Section, Zoning Division RZ-PL20180002374 7-Eleven R5.docx Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 .239-252-2400 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 1973 17.D.5 SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petition of the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirements of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petition or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s). NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED ROBERT J. MULHERE, FAICP, WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPERTY NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER(S) PL-20180002507 AND PL-20180002374. Hole Montes, Inc., 950 Encore Way SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President Naples, FL 34110 NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The fopr9going instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 31st day of August, 2020, by means of physical presence or online notarization, by Robert J. Mulhere, who is personally known to me A or who has produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. STEPHANIEKAROL"� ;�•= Not Public •State of Florida Signat re of Notary Public Commission # GG 965639 orn My Comm. Expires Mar 9, 2024 �� /��(� BondNthrous ationalNotaryAssn. Printed ame of Notary Public (Stamp with serial number) r 00 O M n Packet Pg. 1974 ci ♦ 1 ♦ .1`. ,jell i CO �. I CD ,t. LU cn cc r cc CL S . ir t I I . '- r •' '� VI • /' 1 '�� n♦ i. i t CD CD wi Lu 'LLJ ,sip, r �4 e uj �� sY' •,�i•7 µy iiE1113•'� �� r�fy5 4m ;K.V, u W C ui a. L C .. C U IMS r Ilk" r` 7 _t ((ZN) seldeN AemuGO-10 UGAG13-L MC uBIS Bu'JeOH oilqnd - Cl IuOwL]c)el)V :Iu9wLj3eUv 17.D.6 WOODWARD, FIRES & LoM BARDO, P.A. EST. I97I 7 ATTORNEYS AT LAW September 4, 2020 MARK J. WOODWARD Board Cesvfia Red EaratL Laward inCo�& PWined�tlopnen=Law Via Email ANTHONYP.PIRES,JP_ Collier County Planning Commission .Timothy. Finn 0colliercountyfl.4oy am Loci C10%wraymnt LAW c/o Timothy Finn 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive ].CHRtmrRERLo BARDo Board C A-Nkdtal Naples, Florida 34104 and FamihyLaw ANTHONY J. DimORA Liom5,d in FL and OH Re: 7-Eleven, Greenwa Road, Naples; PL20180002374 (Rezoning, y p ` "RZ") and PL20180002507 ("GMPA"), the "Applications" LENORE T. SRAICEFiELD Dear Commissioners: CRAIG R. WOODWARD Senior Caunsei BoA ` Real '�"te� This law firm represents both Fiddler's Creep Community Development District #1 (CDD#1) and Fiddler's Creek Community KENNFrH V. MuNDY Development District #2 (CDD#2), collectively the "Districts", with regards to ZACHA YW. LOMBARDO the above -referenced matter(s). The Districts are local government bodies CAMfRONG.WOODWARD that were established to provide and maintain certain infrastructure and Ross E.5cHuLmAN services for properties within the Fiddler's Creek Community ("Fiddler's Ik"�inF'aMNY Creek"). Fiddler's Creek is located South of U.S. 41 (S.R. 90) directly South SHAY S.RAJA of the property that is the subject of the above Applications. See attached Licensed in FL and DC Exhibit "A". ' It has come to the attention of the Districts that the above Applications are scheduled for consideration by the Collier County Planning Commission ("CCPC") on September 17, 2020 and by the Board of County Commissioners ("BCC ") on October 27, 2020. Provided the "proportionate fair share" requirement outlined below is included in the adopted PUD Ordinance, the Districts do not object to the proposed rezoning RZ- PL20180002374 or its companion PL20180002507/CPSS-2019- REPLY TO: SOME BACKGROUND ® 3200 TAwAMI TRAIL N. SUINAPLES, FL 3410 Section 12.5 of Collier County Ordinance 2018-27 (the "Fiddler's 2394 AX 239-644-7342 FAX Creek PUD") contains a stipulation which provides that subject to FDOT approval, the Developer or the Community Development District for c eA1°� EAGLE oo Fiddler's Creek is to provide a traffic signal at the intersection on U.S. 41 P.O.Box ONE "when deemed warranted by the County Engineer". See Exhibit "B". The MARCO ISLAND, EL 34146 239-394-5161 referenced intersection on U.S. 41 is the intersection of Sandpiper Drive 334 642 6402 FAX and U.S. 41, as depicted on the attached Exhibit "C". WWW.WPL—LEGAL.COM Packet Pg. 1977 17.D.6 As the traffic from the proposed "7-11" site on Greenway Road (7-11 Site") will impact the U.S. 41 intersection and as the developer/owner of the 7-11 Site will benefit from any traffic signal constructed at the intersection of Greenway Road/Sandpiper Drive and U.S. 41 (the "Traffic Signal") the developer /owner of the 7-11 Site should pay a proportionate fair share for the cost of the design, installation and construction of the Traffic Signal. This will help reduce the cost to the Districts w associated with the installation of the Traffic Signal. The payment by the developer /owner of the 7-11 Site should be in the form of a monetary contribution to the o Districts for the cost of the design, installation and construction of the Traffic Signal, with the payment to be made upon receipt by the developer of a statement from N Collier County that details the amount of the fair share payment and directs the payment to be made to the Districts. Such a proportionate fair share payment and monetary contribution by the developer /owner of the 7-11 Site is site related and project related and is in line with the County Staff comments found at the Cityview portal, the pre -application notes and in County review letters including in Review Number 1, where the County Staff advised the applicant that: "As indicated in pre application meeting notes. This project will be required to pay fair share for a potential signalization at the intersection if -when warranted_ Please acknowledge in your RZ request and TIS." (see Exhibit "0") It is my understanding that a similar stipulation and condition of approval will be included in the Staff Report, i.e., a stipulation and condition requiring that the developer, their successors or assigns and grantees, pay the fair snare costs of a future signal at Tamiami Trail East (US-41) and Greenway Road should FDOT determine the signal meets warrants and is required. That requirement should be included in the PUD Ordinance as a developer/property owner commitment and Obligation. We suggest the following language: "The owner/developer, its successors and assigns or grantees of the property (the Developer) shall pay the fair share costs of the design (including required traffic studies), installation and construction of a traffic signal at Tarniami Trail East (U.S. 41/S.R. 90) and Greenway Road/Sandpiper Drive when deemed warranted by FDOT. The payment is to be made jointly to Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #1 and Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2, within thirty (30) days after receipt by the Developer of a statement from Collier County that details the amount of the fair share payment." K Packet Pg. 1978 17.D.6 We look forward to the favorable recommendation by the Collier County Planning Commission that any PUD Ordinance that is adopted contain the above language. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. APP/Ig Enclosure(s) Cc: with encl: Heidi Ashton-Cicko No rights, comments, concerns, arguments, positions or objections of the Districts concerning the above applications are waived by anything stated herein or omitted herefrom and the right to present, make and submit additional comments, objections, arguments and materials before the Collier County Planning Commission ("CCPC" ) and the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County ("BCC"} or any court or any administrative proceedings are specifically reserved. The Districts specifically reserve the right to make additional comments, objections, filings and submittals with regards to the above zoning and growth management plan applications (the "Applications"). 3 Packet Pg. 1979 17.D.6 EXHIBIT "A" TO L FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS #1 AND #2 LETTER TO COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION W REGARDING PL20180002374 ("RZ") M and N PL20180002507 ("GMPA") Packet Pg. 1980 17.D.6 EXHIBIT "B" TO L FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS #1 AND #2 LETTER TO COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION W REGARDING PL20180002374 ("RZ") M and N PL20180002507 ("GMPA") Packet Pg. 1982 17.D.6 c� 3 c Administrative Code. The easement is to be dedicated subiect to compensation at fair market value of the land orequivalent impact fee credit pursuant to Section 74-205 of the Collier County Code of Ordinances at the time of plat recording or Site Development Plan permitting, unless waived at that time by the Public d Utilities Department. w ti 12.5 STIPULATIONS AND COMMITMENTS —TRAFFIC o M T Subject to FDOT approval, the Developer or a Community Development District formed for N Fiddler's Creek shall provide the following: A. Traffic signals at each of the new intersections created on SR-951 and US-41 when deemed warranted by the County Engineer. The signals shall be owned, operated and maintained by Collier County. B. All required auxiliary turn lanes at each new intersection created on SR-951 and US- 41. C. Street Lighting at major entrances into the development. D. The Developer of Fiddler's Creek has contributed an 18.4 acre fill source to Collier County to supply fill for the widening of State Road 951 to four lanes between New York Avenue and the Marco Bridge. Pursuant to that certain Agreement between the County and Developer relating to the widening of State Road 951 dated April 4, 1995, all Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and PUD conditions which had restricted development and construction traffic have been fully satisfied by construction of the existing four lanes of State Road 951 and by execution of said Agreement. All such prior restrictions and conditions on development related to traffic impacts are no longer applicable. All prior obligations of Developer under this PUD document relating to the provision of fill for State Road 951 have been fully satisfied by execution of the Agreement between Developer and Collier County granting the County the right to enter upon the property for the purpose of excavation of the fill needed for the Four-laning of State Road 951. The Developer shall provide traffic signals at internal intersections when deemed warranted by the County Engineer. 12.6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department reviewed this petition and has the following recommendations: A. That the staff report recognizes that SR-951, after four -caning, will be approaching its capacity in 1990 and that appropriate recommendations be made to include the future t- laning of the northern most section in the county's Comprehensive Plan. B, That Unit 24 be prohibited from any development until SR-951 is 4-laned or the applicant be required to donate to the County the cash equivalent of the construction cost for the 4- tanine of 500 feet of SR-951. This donation, to be used by the County solely for the 4- Words mdurliny are additions: words &M%wk4hw*&A are deletions Alamo Shoreslriddler's Creek PUD Last Revised Alq Z 2018 Page 69 of 71 Packet Pg. 1983 17.D.6 EXHIBIT "C" TO L FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS #1 AND #2 LETTER TO COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION W REGARDING PL20180002374 ("RZ") M and N P L20180002507 ("G M PA") Packet Pg. 1984 F 1i " I , - -x -M61o4,1_n'� San dfiel d-L-n-- �A.n'dr'e'a',L,in ►uKtathy,ILhiirj, I VIOL P" Iq esTR'dJ-- e Ir G) Achill D r--- 17.D.6 a EXHIBIT "D" TO FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS #1 AND #2 LETTER TO COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION W REGARDING 00 PL20180002374 ("RZ") M and N PL20180002507 ("GMPA") Packet Pg. 1986 0 j / �9ammQ awdgaaQ &mnwwoo)Iaojo umpm]-jm9]oZ z` ,agwmdeS -] IL I � 1 J|E E 0 � 2 � Q § a| E < 0 \� 4 Q�Q �mQea Cc, - co &0& 2=e3# \a22 Co e) 6#3oc %E&5£ _�E*3 «%\k« f ?± a\ )$®a] Q)wt0) tE§{c m��3 m co EE%2@ z CO 2�c»: co *o C* �,m� a Cr3 =fjf@ $&aZx at8»2� I =27E§§ k�3\t� E7§aa2 2�«�aZ /ff/#/ \Ek{(j =a&A�a ��-2m> § k $ k J. k % 17.D.6 4z;ofl r CA3mmtyc° 3 Gmwth Management Department October 30, 2019 d w Al Quattrone, P.E. ti Quattrone & Associates, Inc. o 4301 Veronica Shoemaker T Fort Myers, FL 33916 RE: RZ-PL20180002374; 7-Eleven Greenway Naples Dear Mr. Quattrone: The following comments regarding the above referenced project that was submitted on 8-6-19, are being provided as requested. Please be aware that this is not a comprehensive list and is only being provided as a courtesy. All reviews must be completed prior to resubmittal. Rejected Review: Environmental Review; Reviewed By: Craig Brown 1. MCP Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. 2. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the maximum amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within existing utility, drainage, and access easements from the preserve calculations (LDC3.05.07 B. - D.). 3. Principle structures must be setback a minimum of 25 feet from the boundary of preserves and accessory structures, a minimum of 10 feet from the boundary of preserves. Include these setbacks in setback table on the site plans. (LDC 3.05.07 H.3 & 3.05.07 H.1 h.) 4. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07 H.1.£) Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC section 3.05.07.H. Lb. 6. A soil sampling report will be required for review with the submittal of the first development order in accordance with LDC 3.08.00 AAA. Rejected Review: Landscape Review; Reviewed By: Mark Templeton 1. Please label the 30' wide buffer required along the North, the 10' buffer along the West and the 30' wide buffer required along the East where there is residential use across the street. 2. The scale shown below the north arrow on the plan is wrong. The scale shown on the right side of the page is correct. Packet Pg. 1988 17.D.6 Rejected Review: Public Utilities - PUED Review; Reviewed By: Eric Fey 1. 10/22/2019: Estimate average daily wastewater flow per Part 2 of the Design Criteria, following Table I of F.A.C. 64E-6.008 for non-residential uses. Estimate average daily water demand as 1.4 (ERC ratio of 350:250) times the average daily wastewater flow. Estimate the peak daily water demand using a peaking factor of 1.35 per our 2014 Master Plan. Estimate peak daily wastewater flow likewise. Revise the Statement of Utility Provisions accordingly, and state all assumptions, including number of water closets, operating hours per day, and the anticipated water demand and wastewater flow for the carwash. Rejected Review: Transportation Planning Review; Reviewed By: Michael Sawyer 1. Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev. 1: As requested at the pre application meeting. Contact Mark Clark with FDOT regarding this project. Staff has confirmed that this request has not been made, further the site only has 447 feet of frontage and the proposed connection does not meet the minimum spacing of 660 feet. Additionally, the turning movement diagram provided indicates the site will function with a single access which needs to be on Greenway Road which can meet minimum standards for a single access as far from the intersection as possible. 2. Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev. 1: Reference TIS; Provide the trip distribution percentages graphically. 3. Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev. 1: The P.M. peak hour traffic analysis for the US 41 site access drive is missing from the appendix. 4. Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev. 1: The background traffic between the intersection of US 41 at Greenway Road and the US 41 site access drive is not balanced. 5. Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev. 1: Reference comment 1 above ... Access Management Resolution 13-257, Section 3.09.2.1, does not permit more than one connection per road frontage. Revise the MCP and the TIS to remove one of the proposed connections to Greenway Road. 6. Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev. 1: As indicated in pre application meeting notes. This project will be required to pay fair share for a potential signalization at the intersection if -when warranted. Please acknowledge in your RZ request and TIS; and note that compensating ROW will be provided at time of SDP -Plat. 7. Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Packet Pg. 1989 17.D.6 Rev. 1: As noted in pre application notes. Revise master plan to show potential interconnection (provide arrow) to the northwest. Rejected Review: Zoning Review; Reviewed By: Timothy Finn 1. A Master Concept Plan dated 3-6-2018 and a Preliminary Site Plan dated 6-25-2019 was submitted. They both show different layouts and building configurations. Please choose which of these plans you are using and then relabel as "Conceptual Site Plan." On this Conceptual Site Plan please include the following information: - Existing and proposed structures and their dimensions - Provisions for existing and/or proposed ingress and egress (including pedestrian ingress and egress to the site and the structures on site) - Existing and/or proposed parking and loading areas (including a matrix indicating required and provided parking and loading, and required parking for the disabled) - Required yards, open spaces and preserve areas - Proposed and/or existing location of utility services to the site - Proposed and/or existing landscaping and buffering that may be required by the County - This is a corner lot; therefore, this lot has two frontages off Greenway Road and Tamiami Trail with minimum front setbacks of 50 ft. The north and west property lines are considered sides with a minimum side setbacks of 40 ft. As such, illustrate that all structures comply with these setbacks by creating a distance measurement from each of these structures to the property lines. - Show and label all proposed structures include the fuel pump canopies and dumpster enclosures and illustrate the distance measurements to the property lines from these structures. - Include revision date on Conceptual Site Plan 2. Affidavit of Authorizations - Provide the Petition # PL20180002374, on both forms. Moreover, TBC Greenway, LLC is giving consent to Bob Mulhere, Hole Montes; however, Bob Mulhere, Hole Montes is not listed on the application as an additional agent. As such, please include Bob Mulhere, Hole Montes as an additional agent on application under the Applicant Contact Information section. 3. On a separate sheet, please provide a response to each of the 18 rezone criteria under LDC Section 10.02.08.17. See below each criteria: 1) Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. 2) The existing land use pattern. 3) The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4) Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 5) Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 6) Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7) Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or Packet Pg. 1990 17.D.6 projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. 8) Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. 9) Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10) Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. 11) Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 12) Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 13) Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. 14) Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. 15) Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 16) The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 17) The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. 18) Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. Please list and illustrate on a map the name and address of the nearest gas station and the distance of this gas station from the subject property. Rejected Review: County Attorney Review; Reviewed By: Heidi Ashton-Cicko 1. County Attorney review will commence with Submittal 2. If all County staff approve Submittal 1, the County Attorney's office will be notified and submittal 1 will be reviewed. Rejected Review: Engineering Surveyor Review; Reviewed By: Marcus Berman 1. Boundary Survey: The basis of bearing in general note #7 should read southwest. Informational Comments (Comprehensive Planning): This petition may only be deemed consistent with the GGAMP if the companion GMP Packet Pg. 1991 17.D.6 amendment petition (PL20180002507/CPSS-2019-8) is adopted and goes into effect and all uses and standards in the GMPA are reflected in the PUD. 2. The PUD Ordinance needs to provide for the effective date to be linked to the effective date of the companion GMP amendment petition. GENERAL COMMENTS: [Timothy Finn] 1. Additional comments or stipulations may be forthcoming once a sufficient application has been submitted for review. This correspondence should not be construed as a position of support or non-support for any issues within the petition. Staff will analyze the petition and the recommendation will be contained in the staff report prepared for the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) or Hearing Examiner (Hex). 2. Please be advised that pursuant to the LDC, an application can be considered closed if there has been no activity on the application for a period of six (6) months. That six months period will be calculated from the date of this letter. 3. Please ensure that all members of your review team that may testify before the Hex/CCPC and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) are registered as lobbyists with the county pursuant to the regulations regarding that issue. 4. When addressing review comments, please provide a cover letter outlining your response to each comment. Include a response to all comments. 5. Please put revised dates on all exhibits and in the title block of the Site Plan. The PUD document should include a footer that reflects the project name, petition number, date and page X of Y for the entire document. Documents without this information will be rejected. 6. A partial resubmittal cannot be accepted; please do not resubmit until you can respond to ALL review comments. 7. Public hearings cannot be held until the Neighborhood Information criteria has been met. In some petition types a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) must be held while other petition types only require the agent to send a letter. All letters and ads must be pre -approved by the county planner. For additional information about the process please contact me. Please note that the NIM must be held at least 15 days prior to the first hearing. As you prepare for that meeting, please be aware of the following items: a) Please provide the required affidavit and its attachments prior to the meeting (in compliance with the LDC); and b) Please post signs to direct attendees to the exact meeting location; and c) Please ensure that there is sound amplification equipment available and working for this meeting. If there is no permanent equipment, please bring a tested/working portable microphone; and a) You must provide a written synopsis of the meeting that includes a list of all questions and answers as well as providing the audio/video tape; and b) Please prepare documents for hand out to all NIM attendees and the public hearing file, that show the differences in the uses that would be allowed in the existing and proposed zoning districts. This request is based upon recent CCPC direction. 8. Note the adopted fee schedule requires payment of additional fees for petitions that require more than four resubmittals; please contact the appropriate staff and resolve issues to avoid this fee. Timothy Finn, AICP Principal Planner Packet Pg. 1992 17.D.6 Cc: Al Quattrone, P.E., Quattrone & Associates, Inc., Mike Sawyer, Heidi-Ashton-Cicko, Marcus Berman, Eric Fey, Craig Brown, Mark Templeton, Sue Faulkner 3 T- oo O M r Packet Pg. 1993 17.D.6 4z;ofl r CA3mmtyc° 3 Gmwth Management Department December 30, 2019 d w Al Quattrone, P.E. ti Quattrone & Associates, Inc. o 4301 Veronica Shoemaker T Fort Myers, FL 33916 RE: RZ-PL20180002374; 7-Eleven Greenway Naples Dear Mr. Quattrone: The following comments regarding the above referenced project that was submitted on 11-22-19, are being provided as requested. Please be aware that this is not a comprehensive list and is only being provided as a courtesy. All reviews must be completed prior to resubmittal. Rejected Review: Public Utilities - PUED Review; Reviewed By: Eric Fey 1. 10/22/2019: Estimate average daily wastewater flow per Part 2 of the Design Criteria, following Table I of F.A.C. 64E-6.008 for non-residential uses. Estimate average daily water demand as 1.4 (ERC ratio of 350:250) times the average daily wastewater flow. Estimate the peak daily water demand using a peaking factor of 1.35 per our 2014 Master Plan. Estimate peak daily wastewater flow likewise. Revise the Statement of Utility Provisions accordingly, and state all assumptions, including number of water closets, operating hours per day, and the anticipated water demand and wastewater flow for the carwash. 12/27/2019: Report peak and average daily demands in GPD, and ensure the average daily water demand is reported correctly. 2. 12/27/2019: Please enter the property I.D. (folio) number on the Statement of Utility Provisions form. Rejected Review: Transportation Planning Review; Reviewed By: Michael Sawyer 1. Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev.2: Comment not addressed ... TIS has not been updated. Rev. 1: The background traffic between the intersection of US 41 at Greenway Road and the US 41 site access drive is not balanced. 2. Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev.2: Although Greenway Road may not have been classified as a collector, it is still functioning as a collector. The reference to Table 2 in Section 3.09.2 is incorrect. The intent was to refer to the table in Section3.09.4 regarding corner clearances. The previous site plan indicated Packet Pg. 1994 17.D.6 that the fuel deliveries can be made from the access driveway on US 41. Similarly, it appears the site will support diesel truck access from the either the access driveway on US 41 or the north access driveway on Greenway Road. Carwash customers appear to have sufficient access without the south access driveway on Greenway Road. Rev.1: Reference comment 1 above ... Access Management Resolution 13-257, Section 3.09.2.1, does not permit more than one connection per road frontage. Revise the MCP and the TIS to remove one of the proposed connections to Greenway Road. 3. Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev.2: The issue of intersection control is not related to your development alone or current needs, as indicated with your analysis. This was also discussed at the pre app meeting, this is a projected -anticipated improvement. The issue is your fair share of any eventual traffic control intersection improvement devise including but not limited to signalization. There have already been discussions regarding an eventual warrant study for this intersection and your responsibility will be limited to your proportionate fair share. This needs to be a condition -commitment of this Rezone request. Rev.1: As indicated in pre application meeting notes. This project will be required to pay fair share for a potential signalization at the intersection if -when warranted. Please acknowledge in your RZ request and TIS; and note that compensating ROW will be provided at time of SDP -Plat. 4. Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev.2: Site plan shows a stub -out connection, but no note or arrow is included for clarification. Rev.1: As noted in pre application notes. Revise master plan to show potential interconnection (provide arrow) to the northwest. 5. Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev.2: The TIS shows the size of the convenience store as 5000 sq. ft. However, the site plan shows the site as 5,500 sq.ft. Please revise the TIS accordingly. Rejected Review: Zoning Review; Reviewed By: Timothy Finn 1. Rev 2: Affidavit of Authorization - Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A. and Robert Mulhere were provided as additional agents. However, an additional Affidavit of Authorization was not submitted that gives consent from the property owner, TBC Greenway, LLC, to Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A. As such please submit at next submittal. Revl : Affidavit of Authorizations - Provide the Petition # PL20180002374, on both forms. Moreover, TBC Greenway, LLC is giving consent to Bob Mulhere, Hole Montes; however, Bob Mulhere, Hole Montes is not listed on the application as an additional agent. As such, please include Bob Mulhere, Hole Montes as an additional agent on application under the Applicant Contact Information section. 2. Rev 2: Requested map was not submitted, see comment from first review below. Packet Pg. 1995 17.D.6 Rev 1: Please list and illustrate on a map the name of the nearest gas station and the distance of this gas station from the subject property. 3 c Rejected Review: County Attorney Review; Reviewed By: Heidi Ashton-Cicko 'L^ V 1. Affidavit of Representations: Please fill in the petition numbers. d 2. Please provide the legal description on a single page labelled Exhibit A. w ti Rejected Review: Engineering Surveyor Review; Reviewed By: Marcus Berman o M T 1. Boundary Survey: The basis of bearing in general note #7 should read southwest. REV2: Please submit a revised survey. Informational Comments: 1. This petition may only be deemed consistent with the GGAMP if the companion GMP amendment petition (PL20180002507/CPSS-2019-8) is adopted and goes into effect and all uses and standards in the GMPA are reflected in the PUD. 2. The PUD Ordinance needs to provide for the effective date to be linked to the effective date of the companion GMP amendment petition. GENERAL COMMENTS: [Timothy Finn] 1. Additional comments or stipulations may be forthcoming once a sufficient application has been submitted for review. This correspondence should not be construed as a position of support or non-support for any issues within the petition. Staff will analyze the petition and the recommendation will be contained in the staff report prepared for the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) or Hearing Examiner (Hex). 2. Please be advised that pursuant to the LDC, an application can be considered closed if there has been no activity on the application for a period of six (6) months. That six months period will be calculated from the date of this letter. 3. Please ensure that all members of your review team that may testify before the Hex/CCPC and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) are registered as lobbyists with the county pursuant to the regulations regarding that issue. 4. When addressing review comments, please provide a cover letter outlining your response to each comment. Include a response to all comments. 5. Please put revised dates on all exhibits and in the title block of the Site Plan. The PUD document should include a footer that reflects the project name, petition number, date and page X of Y for the entire document. Documents without this information will be rejected. 6. A partial resubmittal cannot be accepted; please do not resubmit until you can respond to ALL review comments. 7. Public hearings cannot be held until the Neighborhood Information criteria has been met. In some petition types a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) must be held while other petition types only require the agent to send a letter. All letters and ads must be pre -approved by the county planner. For additional information about the process please contact me. Please note that the NIM must be held at least 15 days prior to the first hearing. As you prepare for that meeting, please be aware of the following items: a) Please provide the required affidavit and its attachments prior to the meeting (in compliance with the LDC); and Packet Pg. 1996 17.D.6 b) Please post signs to direct attendees to the exact meeting location; and c) Please ensure that there is sound amplification equipment available and working for this meeting. If there is no permanent equipment, please bring a tested/working portable microphone; and a) You must provide a written synopsis of the meeting that includes a list of all questions and answers as well as providing the audio/video tape; and b) Please prepare documents for hand out to all NIM attendees and the public hearing file, d that show the differences in the uses that would be allowed in the existing and proposed w ti zoning districts. This request is based upon recent CCPC direction. 8. Note the adopted fee schedule requires payment of additional fees for petitions that require o more than four resubmittals; please contact the appropriate staff and resolve issues to avoid this r fee. Timothy Finn, AICP Principal Planner Cc: Al Quattrone, P.E., Quattrone & Associates, Inc., Mike Sawyer, Heidi-Ashton-Cicko, Marcus Berman, Eric Fey Packet Pg. 1997 17. D.7 CoMr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountyfl.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver Emerge ncy%Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners For Petition Number(s): SSG MPA-PL-20180002507 & RZ-PL-20180002374 TBC Greenway, LLC & William B. Yeomans Regarding the above subject petition number(s), (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: Jeff E. Wright r Signature*: ❑ Applicant ® Legal Counsel to Applicant Date: August 5, 2020 * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. Packet Pg. 1998 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE(S). Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on October 27, 2020 commencing at 9:00 am., In the Board of County Commissioners Chamber, Third Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamlaml Trail, Naples, FL The purpose of the hearing is to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENTAND FUTURE LAND USE MAPAND MAP SERIES BY AMENDING THE URBAN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO ADD THE GREENWAY- TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 20,000 SQUARE FEET OF C-3, COMMERCIAL INTERMEDIATE USES AND FURTHERMORE, DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST AND GREENWAY ROAD IN SECTIONS 12 AND 13, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 2.81 t ACRES. [PL20180002507) AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A COMMERCIAL INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT (C-3) ZONING DISTRICT TO ALLOW UP TO 20,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (US 41) AND GREENWAY ROAD, IN SECTIONS 12 AND 13, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26, EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 2.81+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL201800023741 0 e.'. t m r::Qf ... - r TC? ij J jj i iE "k m Project i ...:........ Location :...::;:..::. C Say All Interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCES) will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for Inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Suite 401, Collier County Government Center, East Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to October 27, 2020 will be read and considered at the public hearing. As part of an ongoing Initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda Is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercounto aov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting For additional Information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey wilrig colliemounWgov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. { if you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate In this proceeding, you I are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiaml Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BURT L. SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER By: Teresa Cannon Deputy Clerk (SEAL) �aacciasouaos-ai i 17.D.8 3 0'a 1 oo 0 Cl) Packet Pg. 1999 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 2S2-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: Rezone (RZ) Date and Time: Tuesday 9/4/18- 10 : 30 AM Assigned Planner: _ Timothy Finn Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: 7-Eleven Greenway Naples (RZ) PL#: 20180002374 PropertylD#: 00737560004 Current Zoning: Agricultural Project Address: City: Naples State: FL Zip:_ Applicant: Michelle Salberg PE AgentName: Al Quattrone PE Phone: 4301 Veronica Shoemaker B1vd.,Fort Myers, Agent/Firm Address: City: State Property Owner: TBC Greenway LLC Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: 3.1 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: FL 33916 Zip: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the vi. type and number: If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 7/24/2018 Page 111 / / or- t'/ G7 I L! l-> , 3 D r CO Ly, 15eY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes Landscape: Label East and South buffers per section 5.05.05.E of the LDC. 25' Type'D' along roads. Label North and South buffers as per adjacent land use at time of permitting.L'ofm hS jam. r ?ft.(. E A of 14 CA-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. QSE PCa4, aF: +yA Qe.LLG'1 SurJL'4 , Aluj Neu&irw 4 bboj o v o . 5, p7r �. OFE ► �Irk+io(jS U �E -6 61, i roe►p4 Disclaimer. Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. 3! P0 Updated 7/24/2018 Page I-of-9' Environmental Data Checklist 1 Project Name GQEENWA, E 1E.VE The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of v Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. 3. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFNW district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. 4. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. 5. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been ��JJ met. Will Stormwater be directed in the wetland preserves? 6. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. If wetlands will be used for stormwater provide the topo map 07 Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered 8. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 9. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay &6 o£ Y OF l IC for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02,06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. l . Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 13. Where off -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcel(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 14. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 15. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 16. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. i>"" b nF t y 17. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. I S. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 19. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 20. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. 21. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. G The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) Ca) Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. c. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. Address each one. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed v as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 023 PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 24. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? 'Tb%E DckcVM%Nt-I a} U+5 poioT 25. PUD master plan or PPL./SDP site plan notes: Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E. I. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. A note needs to be added to the MCP and preserve as a buffer needs to be added to the commitments. 26. Additional comments 27. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) Straight Rezone Checklist 144. s project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties. (i.e. CON, ST, PUD, RLSA designation, RFMU district, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) 147. Submit a current aerial photograph and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay or vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation. (LDC 10.08.00.B.6) 050.Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.A.2). preserves labeled ab rovide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to e retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off - site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.13-1); 3.05.071; 3.05.07.H. Ld-e). preserve calculation 203 Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H. Le. Q;4. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC .05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) preserve selection 208 Provide the justification for proposing a created preserve versus retaining existing native vegetation. (LDC 3.05.07.H.l.e.i) 3boundary. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) preserve setback 211 Provide the location, maintenance plan, and type of habitat of any proposed off -site preservation/mitigation. (LDC 3.05.07.F.4) Owetland Wetland line shall be approved by SFWMD and delineated on the site plan. Provide permits from the applicable agencies. (LDC 3.05.07.F; 10.02.03.13.1 j.) wetland line a�criosvistency ide a complete and sufficient EIS (and the review fee) identifying author credentials, determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 10.02.02) EIS required ��Plan rovide a wildlife survey and include the species specific wildlife habitat management on the site plan. The management plan shall include a monitoring program for sites � r6a 7 oy rY larger than 10 acres. (LDC 3.04.00) species survey & management Additional Comments: Stipulations for approval (Conditions) ;�t 16 F- 0 OF I Straight Rezone Checklist 144. Is project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties. (i.e. CON, ST, PUD, RLSA designation, RFMU district, etc.) (LDC 2.03,05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) 147. Submit a current aerial photograph and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay or vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation. (LDC 10.08.00.B.6) 150. Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.A.2). preserves labeled 151. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off - site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.13-13; 3.05.071; 3.05.07.H.Ld-e). preserve calculation 203. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H. Le. 154. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) preserve selection 208. Provide the justification for proposing a created preserve versus retaining existing native vegetation. (LDC 3.05.07.H.l.e.i) 210. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) preserve setback 211. Provide the location, maintenance plan, and type of habitat of any proposed off -site preservation/mitigation. (LDC 3.05.07.F.4) 115. Wetland line shall be approved by SFWMD and delineated on the site plan. Provide wetland permits from the applicable agencies. (LDC 3.05.071; 10.02.03.13.1.j.) wetland line 153. Provide a complete and sufficient EIS (and the review fee) identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 10.02.02) EIS required 152. Provide a wildlife survey and include the species specific wildlife habitat management plan on the site plan. The management plan shall include a monitoring program for sites 1�+t6 E 9' of 14 larger than 10 acres. (LDC 3.04.00) species survey & management Additional Comments: Stipulations for approval (Conditions) ?h6E 1 UdFKf Cover County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes ��'a` FASCI: �. �ij'.�,rli� ri '.�• = Am R�►la'- ilia ��id C?"'-%h1A [ Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 7/24/2018 Page I —'I l( cp l `i Collier County Tr. :portation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Transportation Planni " The maximum total da illy trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous "Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development." f 1 iL OF'y ti* Co l er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20180002374 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 david.anthony@colliercountyfl.gov SummerAraque _ Environmental Review 252-6290 summer.brownaraque@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Claudine Auclair GMD Operations and Regulatory Management 252-5887 claudine.auclair@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov 171 Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov I._I�Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Operations Coordinator 252-2584 thomas.carke@coiliercountyfLgov Cl Kay Deselem Zoning Services 252-2586 kay.deselem@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Dale Fey North Collier Fire 597-9227 dfey@northcollierfire.com ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Division 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov L.I�Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paula.fleishman@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James French Growth Management Deputy Department Head 252-5717 252-2426 252-2434 james.french@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Division 252-2484 nancy.gundiach@colliercountyfl.gov Shar Hingson Greater Naples Fire District 774-2800 shingson@gnfire.org El John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodi.hughes@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colIiercountyfl.gov Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marcia.kendall@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov J Gil Martinez Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gilbert.martinez@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov C7 Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 7/24/2018 Page 1-4 of 13 o" Coffier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountyfl.gov stefanie.nawrocki@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Stefanie Nawrocki Development Review - Zoning 252-2313 ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandy.otero@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov triggall@northcollierfire.com daniel.roman@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 ❑ Daniel Roman, P.E. _ _ Engineering Utilities Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2538 ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner james.sabo@colliergo.net /James Ltd' Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 Corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Development Review - Zoning 252-2460 chris.scott@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Camden Smith Zoning Division Operations 252-1042 Camden.smith@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-5740 scott.stone@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 mark.strain@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov / I David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 david.weeks@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov Christine Willoughby Development Review -Zoning 252-5748 Christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing � %�sSzyC q Phone S22 Email N("'C a.►✓�e - i Ik a.� - - ,. , . , I�Jt�1 �NoEa w001�ON I cktlr' 50n C �k I i Updated 7/24/2018 Page of f `f 0 GeV• Owl Cfie-r C014ftty Applicant/Agent may also send site L plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. Growth Management Department Zoning Division PL20180002374 — 7-Eleven Greenway Naples (RZ) - PRE-APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Tom Clarke Camden Smith,(Ops Staff) STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Sharon Hrobak, Quattrone & Associates (239) 936-5222 Sharon@QA1NC.net • Agent to list for PL# Al Quattrone PE, Quattrone & Associates (239) 936-5222 AI@QAINC.net • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) TBC Greenway LLC 14004 Roosevelt Blvd Ste 601 C Clearwater FL 33762 • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) Rezone together with Small Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (FLU change) • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): Proposed construction of a 3,500 sf +/- convenience store, underground fuel storage tanks, fuel distribution and vent piping, 2 free standing canopies, 8 multi -product dispensers (16 fueling positions) for gasoline and 2 multi -product dispensers (4 fueling positions) for diesel. A single bay self service carwash is also proposed. • Details about Project (choose type that applies): Rezone (RZ) — The proposed construction will be single phase on one lot/tract. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Michelle Sal berg PE , Quattrone & Associates Title: Senior Engineer Email: Michelle@QAINC.net Phone: (239) 936-5222 Created April 5, 2017 ,`•. A, Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zoning DMsion - 2800 North Horseshoe Drive - Naples, Florida 34104.239.252-2400- www.cdfergov net .,1103 Jouloa,ma 9z a8m] ginos Is ..Nas !qs --L'A—ZI suO!133SJO uO!POd NJO oS SdSWV.L-ly 12. HE IN I 0 4 1; ql a kq I, If i 4i! 1311 T. 4- A; j; j 4i ZA LO CY) CY) -j LL uj w z < 0 Z LLJ w Of Z W w uj cco 0 II is Z Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ke 7, D w%'X ': . Tv Pat) The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountvfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary ❑ ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1EJ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 full ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ MV ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 Historical Survey 1 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 Electronic copy of all required documents 1 Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ Checklist continues on next page July 30, 2018 Page 9 of 11 i Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD m 4 ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards .ice Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code eExhibit D: Legal Description 4/Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each X Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ElSchool District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams & David Berra Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: P t, ./ _j I ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION I Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 /- PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 V Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 A4_ ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 '•�'j Transportation Review Fees: }� Methodology Review: $500.00, to be paid directly to Transportation at the Methodology Meeting* *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. O Minor Study Review: $750.00 O Major Study Review $1,500.00 July 30, 2018 Page 10 of 11 Coier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party Date July 30, 2018 Page 11 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Goer County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Standard Rezone Chapter 3 H. of the Administrative Code I ne tollowing Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 Pre -Application meeting notes Project Narrative 1^� 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Utility Provisions Statement with sketches 1 1 Signed and Sealed Survey__ Conceptual Site Plan Architectural Rendering List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation Warranty Deeds _ 1 1 Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00' 1 21 Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys 1 ❑ El Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project and, if vegetated, FLUCFGS Codes with legend included on_aeriat Historical Survey or waiver request 1 Traffic Impact Statement, with applicable fees 1 School Impact Analysis Application — residential projects only 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." Tv 09/28/217 Page 7 of 8 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net CO er Gmnty 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following additional reviewers: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Historical Review ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams and David Berra Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Other: I ❑ I Other: w FEE REQUIREMENTS X Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre -application meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre -application meeting will be required) X Rezone Petition (regular): $6,000.00 plus $25.00 an acre (or fraction thereof) o Additional Fee for 51' and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee X Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $750.00 r✓ Listed/Protected Species Survey: $1,000.00 n Estimated Legal Advertising: o CCPC- $1,125.00 o BCC- $500.00 Transportation Fee: ?Q Methodology Review: $500.00 (Additional fees to be determined at Methodology meeting) School Concurrency Review: If required, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Applicant/Owner Name (please print) 09/28/217 FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20180002324 I, William Yeomans Jr (print name), as Manager — (title, if applicable) of TBC Greenwav, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant=contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Henderson Franklin Starnes & Holt P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes: ® if the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the core. pres. or v. pres. ® If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. " ® if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. ® if the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". ® In each instance, first deterrrj�ica the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate formaV6r,1that ownership. Under pe al 'e7,,bf WJury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the fac s fed i are e. Date Th. for going instru eorn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on - v by (name of person providing oath o affirmation), as who is personally known to r who has produced (type of identify ation) as identification. sTAMPiSEAL S ature of Notary Public KEE ANN KENNEDYic State of Floridaion 4 GG 939427xpires Dec 15, 2021 cP\08-con-00115%155 REV 3/24/14 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) P _2D M002374 I, William Yeomans Jr (print name), as _Manager (title, if applicable) of TBC Greenway, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant=contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application, and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize QUattronc c', Associates Inc to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres, or v. pres. • if the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee"' • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penaitwxvafelhAruel p`rjyfy, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts st Date ifs � tit STATE OF FLORIDA ;' J. It COUNTY OF- 6At� Thp fo egoing Jn ument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before mete} by ` (name person prov' ing th or affirmation), as whose, • Ily known to or who has produce (type of ide , I as ic'�entifica#ion,,,.,�� Mtn+r.. CRet9l ANN ;f,�t11E11Y �, ZSnatur of Notary Pu ICSTAMPISEAI - „,' 1qG niy PUb1K •ke Ot FlUttdi � wmmfisioe r* �r v3tn9L z + ,� %IV Conx► EVir®s Dee 15 30�! CP\08-COA-00115\155 iIEN' 3/24/14 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) P1 2MQ U24 I, William Yeomans Jr (print name), as Mina ear (title, if applicable) of TBC Greenway, LLB _ (company, If a l[cable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner�applicantQcontract purchaserrand that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Bob Where,_FAICP Hole Montes to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the carp. pros, or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Oinited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's 'Managing Member," • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • if the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner' of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format forU,lat ownership. Under penaltiO ofjur `) declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated i J ar r '°•. natu Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Th f r oin jn trument was sworn to or affirmed and subscribed before me (date) by �y�_ ( ) (name of person pro in ath or affirmation), as who is personally known to or who has produced (type of i ent ids t . --7— %J w STAMP/SEAL. �gnatUr fNotary blic pNINh CAM ANN KfgA1%4 ` :: MM !w v�:;J.v p401,c ,41,1. r1 }watts 00tripossion N FI '131190 My Comm f 1011 him CP\08-00A-001 I51155 REV 3/24114 'IOlxry P .` -- Otflor3ue i Ct ►7�9t0� sr 931390 Cl R E e ate is. 20, 0 AW"", it Ie"-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.cglliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP ERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This Is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the ►ercentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE list the beneficiaries of the trust with the ►ercentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT a i d. e. 9 9. 2900 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 2S2-6358 If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership_ William B Yeomans JR 31.968% William B Yeomans SR 31.968% Nicole D Smigliani 3.366% KonKam Holdings, LLC (John McGlynn 100%) / Robert Carroll 21.91 % / 10.79% If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE. with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the 4ticers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: 7/12/18 If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or titers, it a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 set County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HOIRSFSHOF MVVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collier-eov.net (239) 252-2400 FAQ(: (239) 252-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: . or Anticipated closing date: AFFRU lVi t, l';R >'EIRV 0140NE SHIP I IlyCHRMATIO Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change In ownership whether Individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County Immediately If such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated an this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: y Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Nner SijnaturK Date William B, Yeomans, JR., a� Manager of�13C Greenway, LLC Agent/Owner Name ( Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colifergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STANDARD REZONE APPLICATION LDC Section 10.02.08 Chapter 3 H. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): TBC Greenway, LLC Name of Applicant if different than owner: William B. Yeomans, Jr. Address: 13920 58th St. N, Suite 1014 City: Clearwater State: FL Telephone: 315-372-3722 Cell: 315-372-3722 Fax: N/A E-Mail Address: bill.yeomans@brooklinecompanies.com Name of Agent: Al Quattrone, P.E.-see attached sheet Firm: Quattrone & Associates, Inc ZIP: 33760 Address: 4301 Veronica Shoemaker City: Fort Myers State: FL ZIP: 33916 Telephone: 239-936-5222 Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: permits@gainc.net PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application, if space is inadequate, attach on separate page: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required, Section/Township/Rangerrs_ L /26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: n/a Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 00737560004 09/28/2017 Page 1 of 8 Additional Agent List: Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt. PA Jeff Wright, Land Attorney 8889 Pelican Bay Boulevard, Suite 400 Naples, FL 34108 RobertJ. Mulhere, FAICP 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 239-254-2000 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Co er County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Size of Property: ±323.74 ft. X ±357.45 ft. = ±112,291 Total Sq. Ft. Acres: ±2.81 Address/ General location of Subject Property: Northeast corner of Tamiarni Trail E (US 41) and Greenway Rd. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N A Zoning Residence S PUD(Fiddlers Creek) vacant/Single Family Residence E TTRVC/A Zoning A Zoning mm Vacant W Vacant Land If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Section/Township/Range: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: A Zoning district(s) to the C-3 Present Use of the Property: Vacant zoning district(s). Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the subject property: C-3 to allow Convenience Store w/ Gas Station Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. 09/28/217 Page 2 of 8 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colifergov.net CAr County ASSOCIATIONS 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Requirement: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: East Naples Civic Association Mailing Address: 8595 Collier Blvd. Suite 107 City: Naples State: FL Name of Homeowner Association: Fiddlers Creek HOA Mailing Address: 8152 Fiddlers Creek Pkwy City. Naples State: FL Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: ZIP: 34114 Zip: 34114 City: State: ZIP: City: State: _______ ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC section 10.02.08, staff's recommendation to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, please provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria noted below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, future land use map and elements of the Growth Management Plan. 2. The existing land use pattern. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property for the proposed change. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment (rezone) when necessary. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. 09/28/217 Page 3 of 8 Coer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will seriously affect property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code Ch.106, art. II], as amended]. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes Q No if so please provide copies. 09/28/217 Page 4 of 8 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net CO1L18Y County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR STANDARD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Al Quattrone, P.E. Address: 4301 Veronica Shoemaker Blvd Telephone: 239-936-5222 Cell: E-Mail Address: permits@gainc.net Address of Subject Property (If available): City: State: ZIP: City: Fort Myers State: FL LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section/Township/Range: 12/51/26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: N/A Fax: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 00737560004 Metes & Bounds Description: TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System d. Package Treatment Plant e. Septic System Provide Name: (GPD Capacity): ZIP: 33916 I TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I a. County Utility System I b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: Convenience Store & Carwash (See attached calculation) Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 2008 GPD Average Daily: 1488 GPD B. Sewer -Peak: 1435 GPD Average Daily: 1063 GPD 09/28/217 Page 5 of 8 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Coer County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: 12/20/20 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Applicant intends to connect the proposed convenience store to the County's Sewer System. The carwash will utilize a reclaim system with an overflow to the sewer system. Refer to attached calculation for estimated average and peak flows. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Applicant intends for all utilities within the project boundary to be privately owned and maintained. Portions of utilities within the County right-of-way will be dedicated to Collier County utilities. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. I PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS I This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 H. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. 09/28/217 Page 6 of 8 7-Eleven Store # 38985 - Tamiami Trail & Greenway Road WASTEWATER FLOW CALCULATION 3,454 SF Convenience Store & Carwash From CH64-E Service Station: 325 GPD/Water Closet (Open 16+ hours per day) 2 Water Closets In Bay Auto Car Wash* 14.23 Gallon per Wash 29 **Est washes per day *(Provided by RYKO SGXS FoamBrite est Fresh Gallons per wash) **(Average. As provided by 7-Eleven) WASTEWATER FLOW = 1063 GPD Average Daily WASTEWATER Flow= 1063 GPD Average Daily WATER Flow = (WASTEWATER) x 1.4 1488 GPD Peaking Factor (Per 2014 CCU Master Plan) 1.35 PEAK WASTEWATER FLOW = 1435 GPD PEAK WATER FLOW = 2008 GPD 650 GPD 412.67 GPD Co er CoWmnty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Standard Rezone Chapter 3 H. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF C REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 Pre -Application meeting notes IL ✓ Project Narrative 1 ✓ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 _ Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Utility Provisions Statement with sketches 1 ✓ Signed and Sealed Survey 1 Conceptual Site Plan 1 ,/ Architectural Rendering List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 1 ✓ Warranty Deeds Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3,08.00 1 ✓ Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys 1 Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. a ❑ Historical Survey or waiver request 1 Traffic Impact Statement, with applicable fees 1 ✓ School Impact Analysis Application — residential projects only 1Li Electronic copy of all documents and plans 1 ✓ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, Include an additional set of each submittal requirement If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." 09/28/217 Page 7 of 8 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Cot[ier County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following additional reviewers: eayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Historical Review ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams and David Berra ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart TTI Other: Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS bi Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre -application meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre -application meeting will be required) Ix Rezone Petition (regular): $6,000.00 plus $25.00 an acre (or fraction thereof) o Additional Fee for 5`h and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee A Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $750.00 1i Listed/Protected Species Survey: $1,000.00 N Estimated Legal Advertising: a CCPC- $1,125.00 cx BCC- $500.00 IX Transportation Fee: ask ted had method mtg and paid if not are you having o Methodology Review: $500.00 (Additional fees to be determined at Methodology meeting) School Concurrency Review: If required, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County N/A Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 A nt/ ner Si natur Al Quttrone, P/E Applicant/Owner Name (please print) G ) m Date 09/28/217 Page 8 of 8 INSTR 5543574 OR 5500 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK DOC@.70 $2,310.00 REC CONS $330,000.00 DNA PG 1192 RECORDED 4/20/2018 3:07 PM PAGES 2 OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA $18.50 Prepared by: Michael D. Gentzle, Esq. WITHOUT REVIEW OR OPINION OF TITLE Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 239-435-3535 File Number: 15492.002 Consideration: $330,000.00 Above This Line For Recording Special Warranty Deed This Special Warranty Deed made this V#day-oiMarch, 2018 between Ronald Mentecki, Roger Fritchey and Robert Johnson whose post office address i A-3 �C� ake Drive, Naples, FL 34112, grantor, and TBC Greemvay, LLC, a Florida limited liability c rt'i a ly �v ose pe €.l `address is 14004 Roosevelt Blvd., Suite 601C, Clearwater, FL 33762, grantee: (Whenever used herein the terms "grantor" and " individuals, and the successors and assigns of corp( to this instru*nt ari4 the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of Witnesseth, that said grantor, for an in Sn d to o t ets o E IN N�1100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to sai gr to in h n p •d s t— ra e th rec'ipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to thelgra_ ltaie? r t 's eirs d sisrever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Collier Coun ri a to -wit: Beginning at the Northeast core Section 13, Townshi`JX 1 o nge 26 East, Collier County, Florida (said corner also being th tiut4east corner of Section 2�( J Thence along the East line of said Seai n 4-T-37"_'At"Mig-9 feet to the Northerly right of way line of US-41 (State Road 90); thence alo g dightib�_ q'fine N 54°18'59" W 484.26 feet; thence N 35041'01" E 400.00 feet; thence S 54018'59" E 260 h0 feet to the East line of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; thence along the East line of Section 12, S 0°11'20" W 154.53 feet to the Place of Beginning, and being a part of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 13 and part of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 12, LESS the East Thirty -feet (30') thereof conveyed to Collier County by virtue of Quit Claim Deed recorded in Official Records Book 1050, page 196, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Parcel Identification Number: 00737560004 Subject to: (a) ad valorem real property taxes for the year 2018 and subsequent years; (b) zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; (c) outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; and (d) restrictions, reservations, and easements common to the subdivision, if any. The land described herein is not the homestead of the grantor(s) and neither the grantor(s) nor the grantor(s) spouse, nor anyone for whose support the grantor(s) is responsible resides on or adjacent to said land. Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said DoubleTime® *** OR 5500 PG 1193 *** land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under grantor, but against no other persons. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Sign , seal and delivered in our presence: (as to all) Witness Name: Witness Name. aureen ullivan State of Florida County of Collier Ronald Mentecki by Roger Fritchey, his Attorney -in -Fact The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before�thjsK attorney-ii-fact for both Ronald Mentecki and Robert` -ohn 644" driver's license as identification. [Notary Seal] MICFih :i7, tif�7�lt MY COMPrIISSION It rF'Ifi1 s88 ?� P EXPIRES: January 1fl, 2019 Bonded Thru Notary PuhQ l!ndew�iiers ___ _..a+v�4'i�imi`-a.��um+avc •n,ia`riefem:�wn::uk'�xu:•ali Fritchey, his by Roger Fritchey, individually and as pally known or [X] has produced a Notary Public Printed Name: My Commission Expires: Warrant}, Deed - Page 2 DoubleTim& EXHIBIT "A" Description: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Section 13, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida (said corner also being the Southeast corner of Section 12): Thence along the East line of said Section 13, S 0°19'37" W 336.19 feet to the Northerly right of way line of US-41 (State Road 90); thence along said right of way line N 54018'59" W 484.26 feet; thence N 35°41'01" E 400.00 feet; thence S 54018'59" E 200.00 feet to the East line of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; thence along the East line of Section 12, S 091'20" W 154.53 feet to the Place of Beginning, and being a part of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 13 and part of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 12, LESS the East Thirty -feet (30') thereof conveyed to Collier County by virtue of Quit Claim Deed recorded in Official Records Book 1050, page 196, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Parcel Identification Number: 00737560004 Q a cp C rn 0 d a n m 2) 6 U Gi m E GREENWAY — TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT SSGMPA AND COMPANION REZONE (C-3) NARRATIVE/JUSTIFICATION Background - The subject parcel is 2.81 acres in size and is located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East approximately 3.37 mile east of Collier Boulevard. The property is designated Urban and located within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. Property is also located within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). The subject parcel is presently zoned A- Agriculture. SUBJCT SITE Exhibit 1: Aerial with Site Location DIRECTION FLUM ZONING LAND USE North Urban, Urban Mixed A -Agriculture undeveloped, agriculture and Use, Urban Residential single family South Tamiami Trail, Urban PUD (Fiddler's commercial, undeveloped Coastal Fringe Creek East Ag/Rural — RFMUD A -Agriculture Greenway Rd., Single-family Receiving West Urban, Urban Mixed A -Agriculture undeveloped Use, Urban Residential Surrounding FLUM Designation, Zoning, and Existing Land Use Nature of the Request: The proposed SSGMPA creates the 2.81 acre Greenway- Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict. The Subdistrict is intended to provide to small-scale shopping and convenience commercial uses to the surrounding neighborhood within convenient travel distance and to serve the public traveling on East Tamiami Trail (US 41), by allowing permitted uses in the C-3 zoning district (Subdistrict language below). The Subdistrict limits intensity to 20,000 square feet, subject to a maximum Trip Cap. 15. Greenway - Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict The Greenwav - Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict consists of ± 2.81 acres and is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Tamiami Trail East (U.S. 41) and Greenway Road, in Section 12, Township, 51 South, Range 27 East. The purpose of the Subdistrict is to provide small-scale shopping and convenience commercial uses to the surrounding neighborhood within convenient travel distance and to serve the public traveling on Tamiami Trail East. The development of this Subdistrict shall comply with the following restrictions, limitations and standards: a. Allowable uses are those permitted by right in the C-3, Commercial Intermediate zoning district, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. The maximum allowable commercial intensity shall be 20, 000 square feet subject to a maximum Trip Cap established in the rezone ordinance. The parcel is located diagonally across the Tamiami Trail East (US 41) from a commercial tract in the Fiddlers Creek PUD (designated `B" — Business/Commercial on the on the Fiddler's Creek Master Plan - Ordinance 18-27). This commercial area within Fiddler's basically allows C-3 uses, but also allows indoor air-conditioned self -storage. NARRATIVE/JUSTIFICATION GREENWAY — TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST COMM. SUBDISTRICT SSGMPA (AND COMPANION REZONE) PAGE 2 of 5 February 17, 2020 Subject Sit Fiddler's Commercial Tract Fiddler's Creek u p naples, florida o Dat vembcr 2017 4 Ma er Plan Exhibit 2: Subject Site in Relation to Fiddler's Creek Commercial Tract (across Tamiami Trail) Florida Statute 163.31779(6)(a)2: 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. The Subdistrict is located within the County's Urban designated area (on the Future Land Use Map). With respect to a. and b., above, please see the Market Study proved with this application. c. The character of undeveloped land. At present, the subject site is undeveloped. The subject parcel contains 1.62 acres of native vegetation. (See report entitled "7 Eleven Greenway Road Rezoning Environmental Information" date June 2019). The LDC requires retention of 7,056.72 square feet of native vegetation (10% of the existing native vegetation on the site). Assuming the SSGMPA and Companion rezone to C-3 are approved, this will be addressed at time of SDP, in accordance with . The property is a "corner" fronting on a 6 lane arterial roadway (Tamiami Trails East) and a local roadway (Greenway). It is located diagonally across from a larger commercially designated tract within Fiddler's Creek PUD. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. NARRATIVE/JUSTIFICATION GREENWAY — TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST COMM. SUBDISTRICT SSGMPA (AND COMPANION REZONE) PAGE 3 of 5 February 17, 2020 All necessary urban services are available to serve the site (and on potential commercial uses). See the TIS and the Public Facilities Report submitted with this application. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. Subparagraphs e. through h. above are not applicable. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. This is a relatively small parcel at 2.81 acres; however, approval of the proposed SSGMPA and Rezone will allow for needed commercial development of the site which will result in job creation, capital investment, and economic development. j. The need to mods land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Subparagraph j. above is not applicable. Consistency with FLUE Objective 5: Implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element. Policy 5.2: Land use policies supporting Objective 5 shall continue to be implemented upon the adoption of amendments to the Growth Management Plan. Policy 5.3: All rezonings must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan. Policy 5.4: All applications and petitions for proposed development shall be consistent with this Growth Management Plan, as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. The companion rezone to C-3 can be deemed to be consistent with all applicable Goals, Objective, and Policies of the GMP, assuming the amendment establishing the Subdistrict is adopted. Policy 5.6.• New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. The LDC provides development and design standards, which often vary by use, and which ensure that development will be compatible with the surrounding area. NARRATIVE/JUSTIFICATION GREENWAY — TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST COMM. SUBDISTRICT SSGMPA (AND COMPANION REZONE) PAGE 4 of 5 February 17, 2020 Conclusion The approval of this SSGMPA is consistent with State statutes regulating comprehensive plan amendments and it is consistent with applicable GMP policies related to the same. The SSGMPA will allow for small-scale shopping and convenience commercial uses to the surrounding neighborhood within convenient travel distance and to serve the public traveling on East Tamiami Trail (US 41), by allowing permitted uses in the C-3 zoning district. Assuming the SSGMPA is approved, then the proposed rezone to C-3 may also be deemed consistent. NARRATIVE/JUSTIFICATION GREENWAY — TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST COMM. SUBDISTRICT SSGMPA (AND COMPANION REZONE) PAGE 5 of 5 February 17, 2020 GREENWAY-TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT REZONE CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, future land use map and elements of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed change is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) goals, objectives, and policies, and Future Land Use Map (FLUM), and the goals, objectives and policies as applicable, of the Growth Management Plan. There is a concurrent application to amend the GMP to create the Greenway-Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict. 2. The existing land use pattern. The proposed amendment is compatible with the existing land use pattern. Property to the north is zoned A and is partially developed with large lot single family residences and agricultural uses. Property to the south is zoned PUD (Fiddler's Creek) and is undeveloped; however, the Fiddler's Creek PUD allocates these parcels for commercial uses. Property to the east and west is partially developed with large lot single family residences. The subject site is at the northeastern corner of the intersection of Greenway Road and East Tamiami Trail (US 41). 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The amendment will not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The rezone to C-3 is compatible with the surrounding residential and commercial uses. The intent of the C-3 zoning district is to provide small-scale shopping and commercial uses to the surrounding neighborhoods and to seine the public traveling on US 41. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property for the proposed change. Existing district boundaries are not illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property for the proposed change. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment (rezone) necessary. Changing conditions do not make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Development will meet the site design standards set by the LDC. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The proposed amendment will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses or otherwise affect public safety. Page 1 of 3 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The site will be designed to meet all County and SFWMD requirements. No drainage problems will be created. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The requested amendment will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Development will meet the site design standards set by the LDC. 10. Whether the proposed change will seriously affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed change will not be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. There are no substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, with frontage on US 41 the existing zoning does not result in the highest and best use for the property. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The change is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or county. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county or the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed Page 2 of 3 zoning classification is typical of and not different from any other similarly zoned property in Collier County. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code Ch. 106, art. Il, as amended]. There is availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, to serve the project. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC. Page 3 of 3 �u 3 E w w ` Vi g m a cLU o L wj! d K wFvai W wm O B W 3J U N1:1X ZZ � u, g z l Z Q N U' g = z� �a �F j� o0 w O NW WN NNE ~ ~ a U U W XX II Wo t9- � WWQ an❑ U z r� 40 wF (.0 a d Ili ¢ acl �� no i•'•' an co o c' ) H'^ VJ W Z 0 Q W LLJ W W I W W W n N m O Z f y �N l7 c N WII M, W� O � Z 2U N Q Wa v ax WW ZN U N O O� 4. n j- II O e Z� OU WOX a' uxl¢ Om Ko OO d~ po u 2 � � Rk. t� \ • 2 i a i' 1LIF 1ll�.�tL i'llt L•. 64 ��tl a,R ,� ' N: s�",. ,�jo�� l t �{r '�-; ,� � ", a � � •� 6 1"Y' �'�. • I, �,r �i �m �uu� Icr. rmnNl lavuuaa R �4[ Im3nli�v sa�a.M woa xvnwa3eo H3na�3zsozoan•Newaelaa w w 0 a z 0 0 LL U F w d w wQ = OC z U C7 to tl i S o i� J w LO 0 0 LLp F �IWlllli�llll�__- xF O 2 O id x o ��m n nnnrl0."_ 30 �_ lI1tIIQftI¢)L= t3 ® 4 yoy: 30 I °;e� EZtL'SLZ 6EZ:d Szzo'SL36E3:d SN3NNVld NVId HOOId _ CO6EEld'SH3AWlHOd SL7311HJNY 30Z113ns mokno A3imuvs EV 1 4llEE ld $3ldVN OVOH AWN333HO - a`�$ p fFE i OHMS N3A313-L Q Mil l, VOl l300Y13tl'JNgll116 — T]e ado �`n2 rz � - J ZOhl F ©pOp© ®pop® _W II II h II II II 11 II II I 1 I N oNvaw:i+�aw a azaoxl.sismnw.oni.n «a<n P � 3 � � � � ® �:4:.e;r�"mow .. •epuo13 � s rt ',punoo iagloo 9seg 9Z ogueg 1tpnoS 15 NN33NION3'VNIN V d1gsuM0l'EI V ZI suOIIOOSJO uopmd I JO ® tl3WVtl�N311lO1S AaNnSSdSWV•,-TV 9 a r Yaws 7' s gar Y ff u URI 9 pg Wi Hpp $Hy? 49� YS�k f gN 3 IE 'a G¢9 e� €ate ; J. H 3 a BY q Y g RFp�p5& AY q�� $¢�$0�� a gE�4m9�g� Sj `�E Ugh Y C§E �y+x Say Ftlgi��i R�'q;3P Ali i 11 $g E ;6R HIS p��QF6$`s B�l6kd@88�5�� eoom tt laa e{}weeO�s �aam®y �37 1 �d g a 2726 OAK RIDGE COURT, SUITE 503 FORT MYERS, FL 33901-9356 ®A IM TRANSPORTATION OFFICE 239.278:3090 TM CONSULTANTS , I N C FAX 239.2781906 1906 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SIGNAL SYSTEMS/DESIGN TO: Mr. Al Quattrone, P.E. Quattrone & Associates, Inc. FROM: Yury Bykau Transportation Consultant DATE: February 17, 2020 RE: 7-Eleven Greenway Naples — Updated Concurrency Analysis NWC of US 41 and Greenway Road Collier County, Florida At the request of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. has updated the Concurrency Analysis for the above project based on the latest 2019 Annual Update & Inventory Report (AUIR). The original traffic study and its Concurrency Analysis was completed based on the 2018 AUIR, which was the latest version available at the time. Attached to this letter are Tables IA-3A, which have been revised based on the 2019 AUIR. As can be seen within Table 2A, sufficient capacity is indicated on US 41 west of Greenway Road in 2024 both with and without the proposed development. The analysis also indicates US 41 east of Greenway Road to operate with insufficient capacity in the background (without project) traffic conditions. Therefore, the conclusions of the Concurrency Analysis based on the 2019 AUIR remain the same as the conclusions as part of the original traffic study report, which was completed based on the 2018 AUIR. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Yury Bykau, E.I. Transportation Consultant Attachments K:\2019\04 Apri1\13 7-Eleven Tamiami Trail East\Collier County Submitta1\2019 AUIR Analysis\2-17-2020 Tragic Memo.doc Z O❑ fQ" a J � } V Q Q V z uj LLIf" QLLJ a� F Z W U J W Z ti 0 6A 100 100 > > N 'I M M z Q rl LL OQ z z z O 0 V1 co - O U o LL K O H J M U O' W ❑ 7 V- a O ,r IL IL F w z ? M y OI 0 y n W O LL D f Q O F U Oy LLJ F y o a 4 p rn v 5a u=1 a w z �I M 0 O O U O O U Q W Z W w O Z G Z 0 O 7 m Co1N N O80 6a N = O U V z x w Q m N a Z F- - 0 U) o y o 0 O (V J Q a) Q J Q J V N K U z Z W *I N (I p Iri Y) W m y y ZQ M W N M N N N N z a N O Z 0 c CIO Z ?� aaZ m Z �Qq: W �U V Z U LL1 Z > O w U -J w ti Z Z W CO WZ ~ J In Q U W W J a $ w r o Z F- I. F w aI co ii r M w o 0 w z U _z V h aw N 9 Q d M 0 w Q a a w K g w M m F O a M N LL V Q [0 ~ z p ~ m m Qcc LO ui Z O z z w a co N U uj U W d OI 'd W m L m a Q) N U W oo O LL = V N � 0 21mw a % mM e v O rn K J TABLE M ANNUAL GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS BASED UPON HISTORICAL AUIR DATA 2009 2019 ANNUAL ACTUAL CURRENT AUIR AUIR YRS OF GROWTH GROWTH ROADWAY SEGMENT ID# VOLUME VOLUME GROWTH RATE RATE US 41 W. of Greenway Rd 95.2 588 1,040 10 5.87% 5.87% E. of Greenway Rd 95.3 588 1,040 10 5.87% 5.87% All traffic volumes were obtained from the 2009 & 2019 Annual Update Inventory Reports (AUIR) " In instances where the historical data indicates a reduction in traffic or insufficient data was available to calculate a growth rate due to construction, a minimum annual growth rate of 2.0% was assumed. SAMPLE GROWTH RATE CALCULATION 2019 AUIR "(1/Yrs of Growth) Annual Growth Rate (AGR) _ -1 2009 AUIR 1,040 ^(v1o) AGR (US 41) _ -1 588 AGR (US 41) = 5.87% 2726 OAK RIDGE COURT, SUITE 503 TRANSPORTATION FORT MYERSCE 3 ,278.3356 OFFICE 239.278A906 ;7ATRCONSULTANTS, I N C FAX ENGINEERING 6 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SIGNAL SYSTEMS/DESIGN TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT i •n 7-ELEVEN @ GREENWAY ROAD COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (MAJOR STUDY REVIEW - $1,500) (METHODOLOGY REVIEW FEE - $500) PROJECT NO. F1904.13 PREPARED BY: TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Certificate of Authorization Number: 27003 2726 Oak Ridge Court, Suite 503 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-9356 (239) 278-3090 Revised: June 5, 2020 '// TRCONSULTANTS,TRANSPORTATION INC CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. EXISTING CONDITIONS III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IV. TRIP GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION V. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY VI. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS VII. CONCLUSION '/I TRTRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC I. INTRODUCTION TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. has conducted a traffic impact statement for the rezone application for the proposed 7-Eleven convenience store with gas pumps and car wash. The proposed 7-Eleven is to be located at the northwest corner of US 41 and Greenway Road in Collier County, Florida. This report has been completed in compliance with the guidelines established by the Collier County Transportation Planning Division for developments seeking rezoning approval. The approximate location of the subject site is illustrated on Figure 1. The approximate 2.8 acre subject site is currently zoned Agricultural (A). The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject site to Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) to permit a development of an approximately 5,000 square foot convenience store and 19 refueling positions (16 unleaded refueling positions and 3 diesel refueling positions) as well as a carwash. Note, a maximum of 3 vehicles can utilize the proposed 2 diesel pumps at one time due to limited space between the pumps. Access to the site is proposed to US 41 via a right-in/right-out only access drive and to Greenway Road via two connections. The southernmost connection to Greenway Road is proposed to be limited to a right -out only. An interconnection is also proposed to be provided to the west. Methodology meeting notes were exchanged with Collier County Staff via e-mail in order to discuss the proposed development. The initial meeting checklist and the latest methodology notes are attached to the end of this document for reference. This report examines the impact of the development on the surrounding roadways. Trip generation and assignments to the site access driveways will be completed and analysis conducted to determine the impacts of the development on the surrounding intersections. Page 2 ,-M61ody-,Ln Sati df ie I d -L-n,-m,--- -e sT a lmm,K-athyOW ---"Mar-ete--Dr- IJ 'A b I t < Achill D r- ZI- T kb viam ar- -sand , -e� p p El '/I TR TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject site is currently vacant. The subject site is bordered by Greenway Road to the east, US 41 to the south, and by vacant land to the north and west. US 41 (Tamiami Trail East) is a four -lane divided arterial between Joseph Lane and Greenway Road and a two-lane undivided arterial to the south of Greenway Road. US 41 has an adopted Level of Service Standard of LOS "D". The Level of Service standard volume for US 41 between Joseph Lane and Greenway Road (Roadway Link ID #95.2) is 2,000 vehicles in the peak hour, peak direction. The Level of Service standard volume for US 41 south of Greenway Road (Roadway Link ID #95.3) is 1,075 vehicles in the peak hour, peak direction. US 41 has a posted speed limit of 50 mph to the west of Greenway Road and 60 mph to the east. US 4I is under the jurisdiction of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). US 41 within the vicinity of the subject site has an Access Management Classification of Class 4, which requires a minimum connection spacing of 660 feet. Greenway Road is a two-lane undivided roadway within the public right-of-way that borders the subject site to the east. Collier County does not report traffic data on this roadway. Since Greenway Road has no posted speed limit, the speed limit per Florida Stature 316.183(2) is 30 mph. III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject site to Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) to permit a development of an approximately 5,000 square foot convenience store and 19 refueling positions (16 unleaded refueling positions and 3 diesel refueling positions) as well as a carwash. Note, a maximum of 3 vehicles can utilize the proposed 2 diesel pumps at one time due to limited space between the pumps. Additionally, the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) report indicates that a presence of a carwash Page 4 '// TR TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC at a convenience store with gas pumps does not have any effect on the trip generation rates. Table 1 summarizes the proposed land use utilized for trip generation purposes for the subject site. Table 1 Land Uses 7-Eleven (5) Greenwav Road Land Use Size 7-Eleven Convenience 5,000 sq. ft. Store w/ Gas Pumps & Car & Wash 19 re -fueling positions Access to the site is proposed to US 41 via a right-in/right-out only access drive and to Greenway Road via two connections. The southernmost connection to Greenway Road is proposed to be limited to a right -out only. An interconnection is also proposed to be provided to the west. IV. TRIP GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION The trip generation for the proposed development was determined by referencing the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) report, titled Trip Generation Manual, loth Edition. A trip generation comparison was conducted for the subject site based on the number of re -fueling positions for Land Use Code 945 (Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market) and based on the floor area of the convenience store using Land Use Code 853 (Convenience Market with Gasoline Pumps). The trip comparison is shown in the Appendix for reference. Based upon the results of the trip generation comparison, utilizing the number of refueling positions (LUC 945) as an independent variable to estimate the trip generation potential of the subject site yields the most conservative results. Table 2 outlines the anticipated weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hour and daily trip generation of the facility as currently proposed. Page 5 7ATRTRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC Table 2 Trip Generation 7-Eleven (a-) Greenwav Road Land Use Weekda A.M. Peak Hour Weekda P.M. Peak hour Daily {2-way) In Out I Total In Out Tatal Gasoline/Service Station With Convenience Market 135 129 264 136 130 2676 3,940 (19 Re -Fueling Positions) The trips shown for the proposed 7-Eleven use in Table 2 will not all be new trips added to the adjacent roadway system. ITE estimates that a gasoline station/convenience market of comparable size may attract a significant amount of its traffic from vehicles already traveling the adjoining roadway system. This traffic, called "pass -by" traffic, reduces the development's overall impact on the surrounding roadway system but does not decrease the actual driveway volumes. ITE indicates an average "pass -by" traffic reduction for Land Use Code 945 of 62% during the A.M. peak hour and 56% during the P.M. peak hour. However, the Collier County Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Guidelines permit a maximum peak hour pass -by trip reduction for this land use of 50%. For this analysis, the "pass -by" traffic was accounted for in order to determine the number of "new" trips the development will add to the surrounding roadways. Table 3 summarizes the "pass -by" percentage for the proposed use. Table 4 summarizes the development traffic and the breakdown between the new trips the development is anticipated to generate and the "pass -by" trips the development is anticipated to attract. It should be noted that the driveway volumes are not reduced as a result of the "pass -by" reduction, only the traffic added to the surrounding streets and intersections. Table 3 Pass -by Trip Reduction Factors 7-Eleven t� Greenwav Road Land Use Percentage Trip Reduction Gasoline/Service Station 50% AM/ PM With Convenience Market Page 6 // TR TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC Table 4 Trip Generation — New Trips 7-Eleven ro-) rreenwav Road Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekda P.M. Peak Hour Daily Land Use (2-way) In Out Total In Out Total Gasoline Service Station With Convenience Market 135 129 264 136 130 266 3,940 (5,000 Sq. Ft. C-Store & 19 Re - Fueling Positions) Less 50% Pass -By -66 -66 -132 -66 -66 - 332 -1,970 New Trips 69 63 132 70 64 134 1,970 The trips the proposed development is anticipated to generate as shown in Table 4 were then assigned to the surrounding roadway network. The new trips anticipated to be added to the surrounding roadway network were assigned based upon the routes drivers are anticipated to utilize to approach the subject site. Figure A-1, included in the Appendix of this report, illustrates the percent project traffic distribution and assignment of the net new project trips. Figure A-2, included in the Appendix of this report, illustrates the percent project traffic distribution and assignment of pass -by trips. Figure 2 illustrates the resulting assignment of all 7-Eleven project related trips (net new + pass -by). V. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY In order to determine which roadway segments surrounding the site will be significantly impacted, Table 1A, contained in the Appendix, was created. This table indicates which roadway links will accommodate an amount of project traffic greater than the 2%-2%-3% Significance Test. The net new trips generated as a result of the proposed rezoning application on the subject site as shown in Table 4 were compared with the Capacity for Peak Hour -- Peak Direction traffic conditions as defined by the 2019 Collier County Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR). Based on the information contained within Table IA, no roadway segments show a significant impact as a result of the development traffic being added to the roadway network. Page 7 7ATR TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC In addition to the significant impact criteria, Table 2A includes the concurrency analysis on the Collier County Roadway network. The current remaining capacity and Level of Service Standard for each roadway segment analyzed was obtained from the 2019 Collier County Annual Inventory Update Report (AUIR). A five-year planning analysis was also conducted. In order to estimate the projected 2024 background traffic volumes, the existing 2019 peak hour peak direction traffic volumes from the 2019 AUIR were adjusted by the appropriate growth rate. The growth rate calculations are shown in Table 3A of the Appendix. These projected volumes were then compared with the 2019 existing plus trip bank volumes from the 2019 AUIR. The more conservative of the two volumes was then utilized as the 2024 background traffic volume. The concurrency analysis was performed by subtracting the project traffic volumes that will result with the proposed 7-Eleven development from the 2024 background remaining capacity in order to determine whether or not sufficient capacity will be available after the addition of the net new traffic associated with the proposed rezoning approval. Based on the information contained within Table 2A, there will be sufficient capacity on US 41 west of Greenway Road. US 41 east of Greenway Road is projected to have insufficient capacity without the addition of the trips generated as a result of the proposed development. Therefore, US 41 east of Greenway Road is considered as a pre - development deficiency that this project should not be responsible for. It should be noted that US 41 between Greenway Road and Six L's Farm Road is shown to be widened to a four lane facility based on the attached Collier County's 2040 Cost Feasible Plan. However, this improvement is not funded in the Five Year Capital Improvement Program. Figure 3 was created to indicate the results of the concurrency analysis on the adjacent roadway network. As can be seen within Figure 3, the proposed 7-Eleven development does not cause any roadways links to operate below capacity. Page 9 7ATRTRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC VI. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS An intersection analysis was conducted utilizing the latest version of the Highway Capacity Software (HCS7) to determine the operational characteristics of the unsignalized intersection of US 41 with Greenway Road as well as the proposed site access drives along Greenway Road and US 41 during the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hours. Peak hour turning movement counts were conducted by TR Transportation at the intersection of US 41 with Greenway Road in April of 2019. The peak hour turning movements were then adjusted for peak season conditions based on peak season factor data as provided by FDOT in their Traffic Information Online resource. The FDOT peak season correction factor is included in the Appendix of this report for reference. The existing peak season traffic volumes were then increased by a growth rate factor to determine the projected 2024 background turning movement volumes. Table 3A of the Appendix illustrates the methodology utilized to formulate the appropriate annual growth rates for each roadway segment. The turning volumes projected to be added to the intersection as illustrated on Figure 2 were then added to the 2024 background volumes to estimate the future 2024 traffic volumes with the project. These volumes are based on the data from the spreadsheet contained in the Appendix of this report titled Development of Future Year Background Turning Volumes. The HCS7 summary sheets, attached to this report for reference, indicate that all individual movements at the unsignalized intersection of US 41 with Greenway Road will operate at an acceptable LOS in 2024 both with and without the project trips in the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The results also indicate all individual movements at the proposed site access drives along Greenway Road and US 41 to operate at acceptable LOS in 2024. Therefore, no intersection improvements will be warranted based on the intersection analysis conducted as part of this report. Turn lane improvements at the site access drive intersections will be evaluated at the time the project seeks site development plan approval application. Page 11 7ATR TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC VII. CONCLUSION The proposed rezoning is to allow the approximate 2.8 acre subject site to be developed an approximately 5,000 square foot convenience store and 19 refueling positions (16 unleaded refueling positions and 3 diesel refueling positions) as well as a carwash. The site, located at the northwest corner of US 41 and Greenway Road, meets Collier County Consistency and Concurrency requirements. The surrounding roadway network was analyzed based on the 2019 Collier County Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR) and future 2024 build -out traffic conditions. As a result, sufficient capacity is indicated along all surrounding roadways, except for US 41 east of Greenway Road in 2024 both with and without the proposed rezoning. US 41 east of Greenway Road is projected to have insufficient capacity without the addition of the trips generated as a result of the proposed development. Therefore, US 41 east of Greenway Road is considered as a pre - development deficiency that this project should not be responsible for. Intersection analysis was conducted at the intersection of US 41 with Greenway Road as well as the proposed site access drives along Greenway Road and US 41. The results of this analysis indicate that all individual movements at all analyzed intersections will operate at an acceptable LOS in 2024 both with and without the project trips in the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hours. Therefore, no intersection improvements will be warranted based on the intersection analysis conducted as part of this report. K:\2019\04 April\13 7-Eleven Tamiami Trail East\ColIier County Submittat\SufficiencyUune Update\6-5-2020,Report.doc Page 12 METHODOLOGY MEETING DOTES APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Location: via e-mail People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) Yury Bykau. TR Transportation Consultants, Inc., (239) 278-3090 2) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Transportation, (239) 252-2926 Study Preparers Preparer's Name and Title: Yury Bykau, Transportation Consultant Organization: TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Address & Telephone Number: (239) 278-3090 2726 Oak Ridge Court, Suite 503 Fort Myers, FL 33901 Reviewer(s)• Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer, Transportation Collier County Transportation Planning Department Organization & Telephone Number: (239) 252-2613 Applicant: Applicant's Name: Al Quattrone, PE. Address: 4301 Veronica Shoemaker Blvd, Fort Myers FL, 33916 Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: 7-Eleven at Greenwa Road (RZ) PL#20180002374 Location: Northeast corner of US 41 and Greenway Road. Land Use Type: Gasoline Station ITE Code #: LUC 945 (Refueling Positions) vs LUC 853 (Convenience Store Size). Proposed number of development units: 3,454 square feet & 19 refueling positions pumps (16 unleaded refueling positions and 3 diesel refueling_ positions) as well as carwash. Note, a maximum of 3 vehicles can utilize the diesel pumps at one time. As per ITE Trip Generation Manual, a presence of a car wash at a gasoline station does not have a demonstrative effect on trip generation rates. Other: N/A Descriptiow Gasoline Station Zoning: A — Agricultural Existing: Vacant Comprehensive plan recommendation: N/A Requested: CPUD - Commercial Planned Unit Development Findings of the Preliminary Study: Project is anticipated to generate approximately 132 net new AM peak hour trips and 134 net new PM peak hour trips. See the attached trip generation comparison. Study Type: Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS ❑ Major TIS Study Area: Boundaries: US 41 east and west of Greenway Road (Links #95.2 and 95.3) based upon the Collier County 2%-2%-3% Significant Impact Criteria. Additional intersections to be analyzed: US 41 /Greenway Road Horizon Year(s): 2024 Analysis Time Period(s): AM & PM peak hours Future Off -Site Developments: None Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation, 10t" Edition Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: Pass -by trips: 50% AM/PM Internal trips (PUD): None Transmit use: n/a Other: n/a Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: None Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: 2018 AUIR Site -trip generation: ITE Trip Generation loth Edition - LUC 945 (Refueling Positions) vs LUC 853 (Convenience Store Size). See attached Tables IA and 1B for the trip generation comparison for the proposed gasoline station. Trip distribution method: By Hand — 55% to/from the north of Greenway Road on US 41. t h 25% to/from the south of Greenway Road on US 41 /o to/from Road, and !o to/from the south on Sandier Road. l ;7:� Zo - ra is assignment method: By Hand Traffic growth rate: From comparison of the 2009 & 2018 AUIR's Speciat Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Sight distance: Queuing: Access location & configuration: One right-in/right-out only connection to US 41 and two connections to Greenway Road. Traffic control: Signal system location & progression needs: On -site parking needs: Data Sources: ITE Trip Generation Report, 10th Edition Base maps: Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: Review process: Requirements: Miscellaneous: SIGNATURES Study Preparer Reviewers Applicant pr'in01:1 i-t!C'';C;i Tam;ami i iai! 3 ti';let}ii:rl^.',.; y'" fell o-,ci•; : +,1= urg rN"fes 3-6-M,,,) r; TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON ITE TRIP GENERATION MANUAL, LOTH EDITION PROPOSED GAS STATION Table 1 Proposed Land Uses Land Use Size Proposed: 3,454 sq. ft. C-store 7-Eleven & 19 Re -Fueling Positions Table lA Trip Generation Trip Generation based on 19 Fueling, Positions (LUC 945) Land Use Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily (2-way) In Out I Total In Out I Total d Gasoline Service Station With Convenience Market 135 129 264 136 130 266 3,940 (19 Re -Fueling Positions) *LUC 945 governs since it generates more trips than LUC 853. Table 1B Trip Generation Trip Generation based on 3,454 SQ. FT. of Floor Area of C-Store (LUC 853) Land Use Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily J I (2-way) ! In Out I Total hi Out I Total Convenience Market w/Gasoline Pumps 70 70 140 85 85 170 2,156 (3,454 Sq. Ft.) Table 2 Net New Trips — Proposed Gas Station Weekda A.M. Peak Hour Weekda P.M. Peak Hour Daily Land Use (2-way) In Out Total In Out Total Gasoline Service Station With Convenience Market 135 129 264 136 130 266 3,940 (3,454 Sq. Ft. C-Store & 19 Re - Fueling Positions) Less Pass -By 1 -66 -66 -132 -66 -66 -132 -1,970 New Tri s 69 63 132 70 64 134 1,970 *50% Pass -by rate. FDOT PRE-APP NOTES Michelle Salberg From: Clark, Mark <Mark.Clark@dot.state.fl.us> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 9:06 AM To: Al Quattrone; Michelle Salberg; levans@creightondev.com Cc: DeBoy, Brian T; Kautz, Nathan; Schaill, Leanna Subject: Pre -application Meeting Minutes 7-11 US 41 and Greenway Road in Collier County (Sect 03010, MP: 23.56 - 23.65) Attachments: Sign In Sheet 7-11.pdf All, A meeting was held on August 27th, 2018, at the FDOT Southwest Area Office. The stipulations agreed to during the meeting were based upon conceptual information provided to the department at the time of the meeting and are subject to change pending any changes to the development plans for the property, changes to the existing state roadway system, or changes to the department's standards or specifications that could impact the development of said property. • This meeting was held to provide FDOT an opportunity to provide comments regarding a proposed gas station convenience store located on the northwest quadrant of US 41 and Greenway Road in Collier County. • This portion of US 41 has an Access Management Classification of 3 with a posted speed of 60 mph. The established spacing standard is 660 feet between driveway connections, 1320 feet for directional median openings, and 2640 feet for full median openings and signals spacing. • The development team explained the new development would consist of a 3000 sgft convenience store with 16 fueling station. A concept plan was provided reflecting a single right in / right out driveway on US 41 and two additional access points on Greenway Road. • FDOT staff explained the site does not have adequate frontage on US 41 to obtain a conforming access point. However, the Department would not object to issuing a non -conforming driveway on US 41 with the understanding the development will have to provide a cross access to the neighboring parcel(s) to the west. • FDOT staff explained while the driveway on US 41 does not meet spacing, there are no immediately conflicting access points west of Greenway Road, so the non -conforming driveway would provide reasonable access in the intern condition, until such time as a conforming access can be achieved in the future. • The driveway on US 41 must be designed with an inbound lane width of 16 feet and an outbound lane width of 12 feet with a minimum ingress and egress radii of 50 feet. • If the site warrants a westbound right turn deceleration lane it will be design to FDOT's standards and include a 7' bicycle "key hole" lane. The deceleration length shall be based on the posted speed limit. • A traffic impact analysis must include trip generation based on the latest edition of the ITE trip generation manual, A.M & P.M. peak hour movement, traffic distribution and turning movement analysis provide in graphic format. The study must also include an intersection analysis of US 41 and Greenway Road. The development team was informed ITE 1011 edition included a new land use code specifically for Super Convenience Market/Gas Station, (LUC 960). Based on the characteristic shown on the concept plan, this would be the appropriate land use code for this project. • FDOT staff explained additional offsite improvements may be required, those improvements will be reviewed once Department has an opportunity to review the traffic impacts for the development. These improvements may include construction or extending deceleration lanes that will be utilized by the parcel. • The developer should provide centerline profile of proposed driveway with elevations and slope percentages from the centerline of the state road to 50 ft. beyond property line. When the developer moves forward with this project, they should be aware It will be a condition of the permit that if and when signal warrants are met within 1 full year after total build out of the site, the developer of this project will be required to review the intersection using the Intersection Comprehensive Evaluation (ICE) to determine the preferred alternative design of the intersection. The developer will be required to pay and construct the preferred design at the intersection. All analyses necessary for determination of the preferred design shall be the responsibility of the developer. Per F.A.C. 14-96.003(4): `Traffic control features and devices in the right of way such as traffic signals, channelizing islands, medians, median openings, and turn lanes are operational and safety characteristics of the State Highway System and are not means of access. The Department may install, remove, or modify any present or future traffic control feature or device in the right of way to promote traffic safety in the right of way or promote efficient traffic operations on the highway. A connection permit is only issued for connections and not for any present or future traffic control devices at or near the permitted connections. The permit may describe these features and/or devices, but such description does not create any type of interest in such features." Please respond to this e-mail within five (5) business days if you believe the information provided above does not accurately summarize the meeting. If there are no comments or suggested changes, the above meeting notes will be considered as acceptable. Mark Clark Access Manageirlent Specialist FDOT ST T VT Stul Gtude Center 10041 Daluels Patkrrvay Fo.rtMyeis, Flotrda 33913 uiark.clark �dotstate.fltrs (239) 225 -1984 TABLES IA, 2A & 3A ■ z 02 � 2� � « <L)Z v LUa� �■m k% �LY � � i # k i § z z g ® Q 0 ( o § § k § A ® ( � §K» ( /:\ , 2 � In K ® o # u ( j ) m § 2 a CL R m q f _j ) § q # k @ k \ & z § & ± $ 0 G k a r (` a m too k § ) o W E § « £ . j ; I § Cl \ \ V � � \ ) k 2 » L m 2 s § § - z � g k LL ) ( { { b b § § I ( 7 3 ( ( 4 j ( ? I ( } ( 0R 2 g O as aaZ CM UJ W L) ,,w Q Lu V M z 0 W z> O ui ci —J W ti m V co co W F Cl- uj K W F J 2 C.)Q a W F- J N U Q CO 00f � C.) a 0 U Q a Q� m a C.) WH a U2 U N N n a a IL U W Z U of R' z a N N LL m a ~ W o 0 z p a o 0 U z U U U W U WI R' 0 U. j C. OV Q N { J O O F i mlm� a Q) m 0 t~A o LO a o N J z z W # N M 2 GI QOi T W y TABLE 3A ANNUAL GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS BASED UPON HISTORICAL AUIR DATA 2009 2019 ANNUAL ACTUAL CURRENT AUIR AUIR YRS OF GROWTH GROWTH ROADWAY SEGMENT ID# VOLUME VOLUME GROWTH RATE RATE US 41 W. of Greenway Rd 95.2 588 1,040 10 4.00% 5.87% E. of Greenway Rd 95.3 588 1.040 10 4.00% 5.87% All traffic volumes were obtained from the 2009 & 2019 Annual Update Inventory Reports (AUIR) Per County SDP comments (PL20200000677), dated May 12, 2020, a growth rate of 4.0% was used instead, SAMPLE GROWTH RATE CALCULATION 2019 AUIR "t1Nrs ofGrowth) Annual Growth Rate (AGR) _ -1 2009 AU I R 1,040 "(ono) AGR (US 41) _ -1 588 AGR (US 41) = 5.87% s � �► � '�� S L M � 'a P a�•�.I o C9FFQ N M e F m43.�i is rCF:Fc gg SIZE a ` n wq�j ,$ a q€ tl 9 ,ty1 W a D t U U' LL 1�-- -Tf � r. a1A D q UUmd114!m UiV aUwU Mo7 to a000 �• UU V �•LL4 gUUOiU U lega 00wUAq U00 0.pl tdU4UUU q � y� t: �b n a i'• 1: NCI n 4 �: iF I vdi 5"j 2) r. b awe ? tl 3 �:vT� •O sle i:K .<, 1° Egr� i 8 T ry �- .� yy!!Y.��!� ^ � :a ^v R (� a g O . `r�. :! `!Y. �OIr•� .� ci .i m.N h S S OS�N�Vi — ., —E O$Y o o PSebaO�gfCa��lg-Yr�n 92 la-F a`�aSF�N~a^G�br%i N� ��ONNW �f�'M HN��Ie �Ni�• T—aa Nlar1 Vi C�O�e Y1N�e O.��TMi1H��N�.GON1Yrl ry%--a O o TIT IT 9 o e y� � h a i a r� r�. N^r IYY e� Y^i N iVi ra�pw P r4i � F• v e 7, irl :3 m M N O fl a T r^V yYj d .^.:d ♦w� a e� N� o m so h T� Frll a f•1 Y � � NY n0 bap P— !G izb$3 �ON!j 09 3�. ..��I—rl�� r Oa X ?Prtnny3�� . a Ell SIR O 8 :�S �• DON — Y n � Y�SN .�. O a N"'1'.�sf�IV hON N P b u, Ise bN�v�fV�ROo • �O aH„fir _Gr. C-- a.tM n sr�.-j t'i {2-NCM�20'r-rr �n VN V 0"CaaGIX :yam f�S n'�a wNRr xL �^..7�A.i�4'.`r 5 � tn�Hgn4'oi f1��^3d�,n g g I �- fiif�nV hy: •rio :`4iY'Pm r: l�c�11ME ��;rnn 2-aiT$rerl�Narn�et9��ct`,a%man_�b�Y�M—.a•-a+'�sc--,.-�.�RM�hN�19Y1>ire•1L;( ig.^n:R3�'larfsgh$nso .. w ..--- N N r 1—.. — � nn —CI ••I � n—n N SKIS SIq, -4 J � � Sm�"i't � � � � 1 r M .•i n n M � � � .i nl I� li Iri m .i .7 rn F� M�MI r� -1 fr1 .� CI �'i � fI rf fi I� w7H7.77.i.zzzW- z w Wa w W W W w W a s as 3 z z 7 w 27. z xaw O ..WWwwwwwlw.wzz7.zz- 00000-1,Wwwga❑gqww wwwwggqa qqw Aww wq gAgqoq gawww wq❑gq'awww wwq I Rug no RR°@°@aR nr°n Be@@�3E'1'a°e9°°@°°O°<@'@@@@@R'RN°RRRRem is �' 1 dggYv � ng�:^ $w9• � 0 U.S a� � O U ro-9lGaD N "� F ?pp6 9_ ❑ a � {u 6r7 _ 1 � hN 1 s fQ •21N In g H NU ?Id o VP m U NN Itl '.t3111] W 41 l:jrgz3 y LR� Eol u $ oY a ij 'fJ eg,oY � 6 q 4r &h� T ; u'9a Wf{ �a'a�•'a'i•'a°� q q 6 y3 y7 OC C G1 C Q 2. eH :7J�rW�pp s� z gas P�m��I� :13L i@ f W4� F M'C I HH ,yt '�a ,ugeg y,y i (q�jfi{�y]m °�t�i � FnGi mayex�•��•�� Gi�`�i Bi Si JS�eTi t%Ti Si rg. g a .Yi :I .7i U I uUG�U�fi4FiGIu oa ^rZ�rrnln"n�.Pi oogaoaooao o'..' :"B�^ee'S��n a? rya t`o aoo 3��Rnf.�P:e'E�i.lm-i-'�R`ame's 000�eaa 0000 a, S�Si$'Rb`SSaoSn.Xacrit.'R 000lo ��q � f}qoo f`;a$.I�3i� oovo SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT SUPPLEMENTAL GRAPHICS FIGURES A-1 & A-2 (SR ?,g '// TRCONSULTANTS, ION INC (26) 40 ce) ILI G LEGEND 4- 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 4-(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 4-20% ONE-WAY AM TRIP DISTRIBUTION (4-(20%) ONE-WAY PM TRIP DISTRIBUTION ,SSIGNMENT & DISTRIBUTION OF PASS -BY PROJECT TRIPS 7-ELEVEN @ GREENWAY ROAD Figure A-2 2040 COLLIER COUNTY COST FEASIBLE PLAN ■ �Y�11 nui ■o�� reu� �� m mum a �e FDOT FLORIDA TRAFFIC ONLINE (2018) PEAK SEASON FACTOR 2018 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY REPORT - REPORT TYPE: DISTRICT CATEGORY: 0300 COLLIER COUNTYWIDE MOCF: 0.89 WEEK DATES SF PSCF 1 01/01/2018 - 01/06/2018 0.94 1.06 2 01/07/2018 - 01/13/2018 0.94 1.06 3 01/14/2018 - 01/20/2018 0.94 1.06 * 4 01/21/2018 - 01/27/2018 0,92 1.03 * 5 01/28/2018 - 02/03/2018 0.90 1.01 * 6 02/04/2018 - 02/10/2018 0.89 1.00 * 7 02/11/2018 - 02/17/2018 0.87 0.98 * 8 02/18/2018 - 02/24/2018 0.86 0.97 * 9 02/25/2018 - 03/03/2018 0.86 0.97 *10 03/04/2018 - 03/10/2018 0.86 0.97 *11 03/11/2018 - 03/17/2018 0.86 0.97 *12 03/18/2018 - 03/24/2018 0.87 0.98 *13 03/25/2018 - 03/31/2018 0.88 0.99 *14 04/01/2018 - 04/07/2018 0.90 1.01 *15 04/08/2018 - 04/14/2018 0.91 1.02 *16 04/15/2018 - 04/21/2018 0.93 1.04 17 04/22/2018 - 04/28/2018 0.95 1.07 18 04/29/2018 - 05/05/2018 0.98 1.10 19 05/06/2016 - 05/12/2018 1.01 1.13 20 05/13/2018 - 05/19/2018 1.04 1.17 21 05/20/2018 - 05/26/2018 1.05 1.18 22 05/27/2018 - 06/02/2018 1.06 1.19 23 06/03/2018 - 06/09/2018 1.08 1.21 24 06/10/2018 - 06/16/2018 1.09 1.22 25 06/17/2018 - 06/23/2018 1.08 1.21 26 06/24/2018 - 06/30/2018 1.08 1.21 27 07/01/2018 - 07/07/2018 1.07 1.20 28 07/08/2018 - 07/14/2018 1.06 1.19 29 07/15/2018 - 07/21/2018 1.06 1.19 30 07/22/2018 - 07/28/2018 1.06 1.19 31 07/29/2018 - 08/04/2018 1.06 1.19 32 08/05/2018 - 08/11/2018 1.06 1.19 33 08/12/2018 - 08/18/2018 1.07 1.20 34 08/19/2018 - 08/25/2018 1.08 1.21 35 08/26/2018 - 09/01/2018 1.10 1.24 36 09/02/2018 - 09/08/2018 1.11 1.25 37 09/09/2018 - 09/15/2018 1.13 1.27 38 09/16/2018 - 09/22/2018 1.12 1.26 39 0-9/23/2018 - 09/29/2018 1.10 1.24 40 09/30/2018 - 10/06/2018 1.09 1.22 41 10/07/2018 - 10/13/2018 1.08 1.21 42 10/14/2018 - 10/20/2018 1.06 1.19 43 10/21/2018 - 10/27/2018 1.04 1.17 44 10/28/2018 - 11/03/2018 1.02 1.15 45 11/04/2018 - 11/10/2018 0.99 1.11 46 11/11/2018 - 11/17/2018 0.97 1.09 47 11/18/2018 - 11/24/2018 0.96 1.08 48 11/25/2018 - 12/01/2018 0.96 1.08 49 12/02/2018 - 12/08/2018 0.95 1.07 50 12/09/2018 - 12/15/2018 0.94 1.06 51 12/16/2018 - 12/22/2018 0.94 1.06 52 12/23/2018 - 12/29/2018 0.94 1.06 53 12/30/2018 -- 12/31/2018 0.94 1.06 * PEAK SEASON 26-FEB-2019 18:31:28 830UPD 1-0300-PKSEASON.TXT TRAFFIC COUNTS US 41 cv GREENWAY ROAD .41 m 0 N M N V O N In all S Q O O N Cl) N v N G N N V _ N Q, N to t0 i) Z 6 E fd O Z N ro c lL J ; m et < C� r-e m 00 0 00 O C M m 00 �... 00 M r 0 p O t- r N N 0 M O t0 ^ W m < r N N 00 N r r O O O C co cm 0 CD M N cli m �` m 000 0 O M< er O OOi h O < r Q H M r< O 3 O O M Z F O O O O O O O O O O O O p p ~O O M Z O O O t0 W r 00 M O W o M w O O O jM„' LO I to rV O J aN- 00 0 0 o c CA "n � N O W O N L N f00 0 M N tD h h w 400 N h N O c~'> O ti t0 M M O O ^ N 01 O p l O I, h 00 O O O O O) N r N C-in N M- M" N 00 O O CD N a 0 << Q rl t r N N N 00 O M O O ti ti O O O O M z =` O O O O O O O O O I O O O p0 OC ' C O Z F N N 00 ti 00 < r � O 0r C C < r m M r < r N NICr O 04 T O O O ~ J r r r O O O a a) � 00 r O M Z 42 O L O O O O O O O r O r O < C O �` O Z Z F- O o L N O O M N m r 0< rIM < N N O�tn O m fC O O O f0 O O O O C. CD N a 0 f00 V' N N I 0 V' a O N lN N O a 00 o N 00 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o o c o p ti c o Z z o o y C y < r M o o O M O v n O O N ti O O O M t0 O e 00gn J O o O C t7 a N O m r o N fro at' �' N 'V m N O 0 N p O O CD 'cf' M an N (T N N N N 0) O N C N Lq Q F O C O O >> o 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 o I a o 0 oc ors O O 0) z V N N O O O M O N N< N O tq O O< N Cl) O f0 O N f0 O C +L,. 7 of th O M M y 0 < M r<( t0 O< O O l r O h CV G O c� fA O C. O p 'C 00 0) O 00 M -e O r wI O M ppj N O M N M N < N N N N ( tT O N m r O O f- r p O E O '!- M 7 O Ln O M 'A ld Ln C ra.. O. w U .z 2 LL 1- o 0 0 o F o 0 0 o F 10- Q F o f Q C-14 L Q a Q d E 0 N U rn c C U m O) O N N O W U) al Q rn O N I7 N 4 T m 3 c CD a� C7 _ N U) ca D Z GI E m 0 Z R U. J US 41 3 212 6 0 Right Thru Left U-Turn 0 M N M N ag �tiGo N d N O v L > Al m U. L L L s°moo'' a c N Co d Q Q Q Q � <'/ </ wnl•n ua-1 ni41 14BIN 0 9v 06Z 06 tv sn a F O b C J Lo L c� Y F o 0 Cl) 01 O W a c 0 0. a� n_ c d E d 0 OI C E H O a z O U O N M N d O to N `o 0 f6 p to to t0 t0 LO 10 N N 00 O N p O N r M M ~ N co co m N N N N m O C. 00 t0 Qr y N N N r ar- O C _ O M T O M O co O w 0i t `O-- O p O O p 2 F CD O O O O O O O O O O p O p O + O m Z 7 co M La O h t0 O O O n 00 r O a 0 df N r- r J rh N N N N O r r r N a O O O f71 p y to" r, M N m W O N L h to cM0 h O U w t0 w N O N N to t0 w N CD07 O N to p r, r Ln O t0 m I w O O Cf V M N O tG CO r tp cM- r O O to r O a to 0 't b O a rm,. M tf! r N r N r �! h 01 co r r N r r h O O h a0CL 0, O O O O p 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CDp p + O m m H O O Z O � C tT N 00 M O O O O N M O � h t0 O C N N J r r r O I r r N r tp m O C. tD 00 A C 0 .sz W sr N O O M M M O O T V' r 0 0 0 l r O ill M O O to "? z O O O r O t tb M O h O r O M r N O O O N I N CD h er' O O --t x O O O 0 O -e M M O r r r I Q b to t0 T I t00 O M O O O w N m Q F r to E O O p Z 0 0 0 0 0 I O O O b 0 O I O p p + IB O m Z CDo O. O M O p th m 0 W O� r l r M N M O !b O N O O O r to 0 tt O L +'+ ` M N h p r h 0 V L N to O O 0 h r Or 0 O r O 0 0 M O M co a Oa N e} O O to O N O fm N t0 N N M M r m O N O N r O O O M co to � O O O r O b O o o a W to N m M a 0 N r r 0f uo CO r h t0 r r N r h b C tD m t0 h ,v c o 0 o z 0 o 0 0 j I o b CD o b b ( o o o + b m r r Z O d O r O r N r O N r V' b t0 O O N W O J O O O p .Q 4a Z ` O L 0 0 0 0 0 O O CD O O O O C. O w (7 (n ~ r m N I h :� w m 0 h O f` t0 O O m N r l0 r r r tD O O w 1a p y o to b to b T o rn b c �o a :° Y o tL l E O r c� 7 ., o M a ., +. a; 0 0 0 2>_ is 10 10 er o r� n: r h o LO o 0 2 n. 0. E 0 m C 0 O J V. m 0 N co N d O N N hr- I,N o E �© T 3 c Ley r , 1 r- m Z rn s US 41 14 607 19 0 Right Thru Left U�-Tuurn V uinl-n ue'f w41 4481a 0 9L 96Z 69 Lv sn a� rc ae1 ♦� F A 3 v co .. C7 o CM DEVELOPMENT OF, FUTURE YEAR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES w \ 0 R �LLJ R co . \ kco w q 0Ad � a ¢\ m m � _ 2 2 0 W m� c 2� § � oq @q m -# 2 §<\ n/n ƒmn Q� w ®\\ 0r It- &wm C-4 N o\c \rr- 1- w co� ® /©r- co w \fk \®c +co # me\o \nN 04 � 04 �& \ E�E �Ce)C /rk k oc w C� \/\©� 7/ �w CL g $o9 \©G /V) m C %L N�m 0®k k mk� & he I C)LoC Cl)k �0 CL . w mqm /mom $$ / W w / « m\r Em■ to 2 W o�o f� \ %no N G�to 0to to cc 2 $ � §\$ f L)�/ 0 2 2 C: o c o �o> \ $ E2 c §k2 0 o m 5 = > _ �o� $j E} E§$ CD & t& \§� �f\ @ \ Rm£ =�I «_ 7%\ CD \ ƒIU o/q Iq G�2 \mf- I- K \\/ /©k 2k � p�2 \r$ 22 m E�I- C®t- P- R o\o C) 22 w mqq /mom \m & a E § o $ $ /LL t f c o > = e $ 2- .0 c Ea §"S 0 °02 IOq �2 »c -seG E0m J $3& PR tb [ a) IL o o /$f =2m 3 4$ k 2 k\ o N ƒI/ o/q ILq �C C O ,L C 7 v t� m L d L LL. U O Q N .0 � 7 4) N C. O O Q N C N ►O tLN � Q N �1 N a z L `- O 000 �Ln0 o r o ti pOp \° o 0Ln0 O r O W Cc h- OOO 0 0U.) O r O �pOp 0 C) O r o � p O p 0 O r O I� C) 0 to o LO LO r O pOp 0 OLO0 O r t7 r, p O p o 00 Ln O O r O p tnO U)U) W O O O O r 0 to 0 O ca o a 0 0 t!'1 pOp Oun0 O 00 aw O d' v pop OLno O 00 r x0 00 O Y to tV a tiro NOM 0Lnte o to � I— tLc r r r r N T 000 OLnO o r O ti CD CD c 8Ln0 O LL Z'. r o 00 CDtrn 0 o`nU) 00 Z N 10�0 0 Ln0 O Z r O 1� L E 0 E > •. O U O C U c N > Ed ` C > '_' � U) f- 0 t O " c s 45 'O "a O N C C CU U) L0 N � O Y ` 0)d m f� �C QS U U f ca � C -C O m (�j m > O Nqt 7 N S O N O O (L U (D }- N d N ti p O p o U) O O r O 0�1�. C4 0�000 CM 00 r N h p Op \° o OLn0 O `+ O ti 0Op o 0LnO O r O C M p 0 � 0 0 L N� 00 r r T N T h o 0 o OLn0 O r O 41 7-6 O U O U U- +' C O C 0EUC C to •O a) 0' a) Ea N F 0 f > �Uu? i =3 0) n N N O L C O L CD t0 m j (D F- U) C - m V m N �GY � - O ON pN LLd0 (9? N O N m CO — } f6 CLS 0 O c 0 mODO 0Lo0 O m0L?O OtoO O O m O 0 O C) O O m T > C)O N O O O m \° ti O O aU.) O O m O o O 000 O > O O O O mo0O 0 0U-)0 O 0]ODO 0 OLn0 O w O w O m00d 0 dtn0 O ^m000 W 0 0U)0 O Q W C;CL O OM coU) o0 c Jm 00 O LA O O)o co o o C) )O 00 T Q W O o W M O v v O m000 o Oin0 OTO O cocl)ODO c 0 in0 OO IL n. QmNOM 0 oLn a m o 0 doLO N N _I CDODO t� a OU-) O O .J coo h- o OtnO O U) O U T 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0 O co z •- o z inao o .- o o LO co O o co coZ' O T Z V J ti o J m 0 0 0 0 Lo 0 P- t z Z o n t ` 7 N p U LL n - -co c .+ E U C O :3 F- :3 O + , ` c O c U 1 m U) C .X C ca -a 0 0 to N d (0 Co Y � U Y U 7 N U) C O fa -C •''' m M U m N N p N 4 a) nO LLU 0- (iN n.N n. o O D O 0U-) 0 O 0 D O O 0 0 L 0 O �- r• T N T ti O D O 0 0 00 co •- O 4 7 �O N p U� 2 C c c CD O O P c N O En EUC N N 0 j f- O + I6 O O c c d 20U O 0) 0) c�c cn v o 2 o 0- 0) 'E N C t(f a ICimY U U O fll O H F• (n c U L m U m �q O O(a N p N LLd0 i-N N w m F- rio J >m LL,, m W H QW a ,n O Q W O M ti = Ui Y d a Sw am C. J m U) w m Z h d Z Q drn N o N J CM Z fA n N m Q N c0 } (6 N —0 �0m p O p0 � Lf) O M 00 M O ti 000 o N 0 O to O O � (h d Lf) Lt) r• O CD O o O Lf) O O J m e- 7 0 1- 090 0LL,0 V-IRT O � MO o O CD 0 9 O 00 0 000 0U)O O O pOp OLn0 O m000 0Lf)0 0 p W O a o o 0Ln0 O m0 goo 0 000 O p a O O 0 p Op 0Lo0 O lf) m000 0 OLf)0 O 0 O O W O O p 0 O to O co to � =� 0 0 o 0 U.)O p x O Lli 01 O`0 8-0 0Lo0 O IL Qom•, MODO 0Lf)o O p O 090 o ou)o o J m000 ti o oleo 0 O 0 P- pOp R OLn0 O 0 o �LnO O r O Z O ogo oP- o LA O O oo m o 0 00 Lj) 0 0 o0 Z `- 0 0 C:) o 0 L()O 0 _L m090 P.- 0Lf)0 0 O Z •- o E co ram• c 0 0 o V OD,O 0 c 0 Ln o V a)O 7 ULL _ o O U�: t -C O 0> c C (n 0 0 Ep`. c o o 0> c E cn 0 N O Ea` E6o OD O Esc Lv � 2 + N 0 id 0 .r -0 O '6 cn 0 �- (0 O > U V3 0� a) U cn o °c) o 0)CY O o) C 0)s 0) 0 N -0 _ O 0) E m 7 N m f C O L •�' m V [Q f C •c '•' m ��7 U m >Y �� O N Nd. O N ?>Y 4 j O�} O �0-0 CDN Q.N CGa-U C9>-N 0 N INTERSECTION ANALYSIS HCS SUMMARY SHEETS US 41 * GREENWAY ROAD 2024 AM PEAK SEASON PEAK HOUR