Loading...
HEX Agenda 10/22/2020Collier County Hearing Examiner Page 1 Printed 10/14/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner AGENDA Growth Management Department Conference Rooms 609/610 2800 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 October 22, 2020 9: 00 AM Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP Hearing Examiner Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes unless otherwise waived by the Hearing Examiner. Persons Wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the hearing report packets must have that material submitted to County staff at Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov 10 days prior to the Hearing. All materials used during presentation at the hearing will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner are final unless appealed to the Board of County Commissioners. Hearing Procedures will provide for presentation by the Applicant, presentation by staff, public comment and applicant rebuttal. The Hearing Examiner will render a decision within 30 days. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the decision by mail may supply County staff with their name, address, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope for that purpose. Persons wishing to receive an electronic copy of the decision may supply their email address. October 2020 Collier County Hearing Examiner Page 2 Printed 10/14/2020 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Review of Agenda 3. Advertised Public Hearing A. PETITION NO. CCSV-PL20200000764 – HHR Naples, LLC requests a variance from the Coastal Construction Setback Line to allow for the expansion of an existing boardwalk approximately 80.1 feet seaward of the Coastal Construction Setback Line, for property located as 280 Vanderbilt Beach Drive and described as 32 48 25 THAT PORTION OF SEC 32, DESC AS “HOTEL SITE” IN OR 1073 PG 1474 & ANNEX PARK SITE DESC IN OR 1181 PG 1660 & 2.80 AC DESC IN OR 1296 PG 958, in Section 32, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Jaime Cook, Principal Environmental Specialist) Commissioner District 2 B. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20190000959 – St. George Group, Corp. requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance Number 05-53, the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD, to modify Condition 2.12.B and the PUD master plan to require the wall along Tract B only, to modify Condition 2.14.A.3 to require interconnection of the internal sidewalk concurrent with the road interconnection from Tract B to Tract A consistent with LDC Section 6.06.02.B, and revisions to PUD Monitoring, Environmental and Housing conditions so that current Land Development Code standards and policies apply, for Tract B of the PUD property consisting of 6.7 ± acres, located on the east side of Santa Barbara Blvd, approximately 2,300 feet south of Radio Road, in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Commissioner District 3 4. Other Business 5. Public Comments 6. Adjourn 10/22/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.A Item Summary: PETITION NO. CCSV-PL20200000764 – HHR Naples, LLC requests a variance from the Coastal Construction Setback Line to allow for the expansion of an existing boardwalk approximately 80.1 feet seaward of the Coastal Construction Setback Line, for property located as 280 Vanderbilt Beach Drive and described as 32 48 25 THAT PORTION OF SEC 32, DESC AS “HOTEL SITE” IN OR 1073 PG 1474 & ANNEX PARK SITE DESC IN OR 1181 PG 1660 & 2.80 AC DESC IN OR 1296 PG 958, in Section 32, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Jaime Cook, Principal Environmental Specialist) Commissioner District 2 Meeting Date: 10/22/2020 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Senior – Zoning Name: Jeremy Frantz 09/22/2020 12:23 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 09/22/2020 12:23 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Rose Burke Review Item Completed 09/23/2020 12:11 PM Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 09/25/2020 11:18 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 09/25/2020 12:07 PM Growth Management Department Kirsten Wilkie Additional Reviewer Completed 09/28/2020 11:16 AM Growth Management Department Matthew McLean Additional Reviewer Completed 09/28/2020 11:18 AM Zoning Anita Jenkins Review Item Completed 09/28/2020 4:24 PM Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 10/22/2020 9:00 AM 3.A Packet Pg. 3 CCSV-PL20200000764, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Road October 22, 2020 Hearing Examiner Page 1 of 8 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: October 22, 2020 SUBJECT: PETITION CCSV-PL20200000764, 280 VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD _____________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Agent: HHR Naples, LLC Ray Piacente, PMP, LEED AP 4747 Bethesda Avenue #1300 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Bethesda, MD 20814 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd #300 Naples, FL 34108 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) consider an application for a Coastal Construction Setback Line (CCSL) Variance, in accordance with Land Development Code (LDC) section 9.04.06, for an 80.1-foot variance from the Coastal Construction Setback Line (CCSL) to modify an existing boardwalk. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located on property at 280 Vanderbilt Beach Blvd and further described in Exhibit A. (See location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The proposal consists of expansion of an existing boardwalk seaward of the CCSL. The original boardwalk was approved under Resolution 83-117 and built under building permit 85-2730. 3.A.a Packet Pg. 4 Attachment: Staff Report - PL20200000764 Ritz Carlton CCSV (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) CCSV-PL20200000764, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Road October 22, 2020 Hearing Examiner Page 2 of 8 CCSL Variance Request The proposed improvements require a public hearing in front of the Hearing Examiner to consider approval of a Variance to build seaward of the Coastal Construction Setback Line (CCSL). The aerials provided by the petitioner depict the subject property with existing and proposed structures in relation to the CCSL. Three boardwalks and various other structures have been approved seaward of the CCSL under Resolutions 83-117, 95-247, 2000-252, and 2002-266. The applicant proposes to expand an existing boardwalk structure by 286 square feet; the expansion will not encroach any further into the CCSL than the current structures approved under the prior resolutions. The expansion area would encroach 80.1 feet into the CCSL. The seaward-most part of the expansion area is located approximately 133.5 feet from the Mean High-Water Line (MHWL) and 56.9 feet from the Vegetation Line. The proposed project includes cantilever expansion of the existing boardwalk in three locations (see Applications and Supporting Documents page 23). Based on a current survey, the existing boardwalk encroaches approximately 97 feet 2 inches into (seaward) of the 1974 CCSL. SITE PLAN The Construction Site Plan is five pages provided in the Application and Supporting Documents pages 12 – 16. The site plan on page 23 is a close-up of the improvements seaward of the CCSL. 3.A.a Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: Staff Report - PL20200000764 Ritz Carlton CCSV (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) CCSV-PL20200000764, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Road October 22, 2020 Hearing Examiner Page 3 of 8 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: Hotel development, with a zoning designation of PUD (Pelican Bay). North: Vanderbilt Beach Road and Vanderbilt Beach County Park, with a zoning designation of PUD (Pelican Bay). South: Bay Colony Drive and Remington at Bay Colony Condominium, with a zoning designation of PUD (Pelican Bay). East: Trieste at Bay Colony Condominium with a zoning designation of PUD (Pelican Bay). West: Gulf of Mexico. Aerial exhibit provided by Collier County GIS. 3.A.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: Staff Report - PL20200000764 Ritz Carlton CCSV (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) CCSV-PL20200000764, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Road October 22, 2020 Hearing Examiner Page 4 of 8 GROWTH MANAGEMENT (GMP) IMPACT: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT OF GMP OBJECTIVE 10.4: Restore and then maintain, when appropriate, developed coastal barriers and developed shorelines, by establishing mechanisms or projects which limit the effects of development and restores the natural functions of coastal barriers, including beaches and dunes. Staff comment: The policies below primarily addresses the need for dune restoration on developed shorelines. The applicant will provide a dune restoration plan that must be completed prior to certificate of occupancy, if applicable. Policy 10.4.1: Promote environmentally acceptable and economically feasible restoration of the developed coastal barriers and the urban beach and dune systems. Staff comment: The proposed project includes dune restoration of disturbed areas prior to the certificate of occupancy under the building permit. Policy 10.4.3: Collier County shall prohibit activities which would result in man-induced shoreline erosion beyond the natural beach erosion cycle or that would deteriorate the beach and dune system. Implementation of this policy will be based upon available scientific/coastal engineering literature/studies that have established benchmarks for natural rates of beach erosion. Staff comment: The proposed project includes dune restoration of disturbed areas prior to the certificate of occupancy under the building permit. Policy 10.4.4: Require dune stabilization and restoration improvements in land development projects along beach areas. Staff comment: The proposed project includes dune restoration of disturbed areas prior to the certificate of occupancy under the building permit. Staff has included a condition to the CCSL Variance approval to ensure this Policy is implemented, if applicable. Policy 10.4.6: Require native vegetation as landscaping in development activities in developed coastal barrier systems and on the beach and dune systems. Staff comment: The proposed project includes dune restoration of disturbed areas prior to the certificate of occupancy under the building permit. Staff has included a 3.A.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: Staff Report - PL20200000764 Ritz Carlton CCSV (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) CCSV-PL20200000764, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Road October 22, 2020 Hearing Examiner Page 5 of 8 condition to the CCSL Variance approval to ensure this Policy is implemented, if applicable. Policy 10.4.7: Collier County shall prohibit construction seaward of the Coastal Construction Setback Line except where such construction would be permitted pursuant to the provisions of the Florida Coastal Zone Protection Act of 1985, where such prohibition would result in no reasonable economic utilization of the property in question, or for safety reasons. In such cases, construction will be as far landward as is practicable and effects on the beach and dune system and the natural functions of the coastal barrier system shall be minimized. Staff comment: The proposed structure is in line with contiguous and adjacent structures on the property that were approved under previous CCSL Variance Resolutions. Any disturbed areas will include the restoration of the dune will follow the natural dune profile, thus further enhancing the overall beach dune system. GMP Consistency Summary: The proposed variance is consistent with applicable provisions of the Growth Management Plan Objective 10.4. for the reasons stated above. STAFF ANALYSIS: The decision to grant a variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.06. Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: A. The coastal construction setback line shall be that coastal construction setback line established by the Department of Environmental Protection of the State of Florida pursuant to F.S. § 161.053 and recorded in Coastal Setback Line Book 1, pages 1 through 12 inclusive, recorded October 31, 1974, as Clerk's Instrument No. 365665 of the public records of Collier County, Florida. Staff Comment: The existing structure and improvements were built under Building Permit 85-2730; the existing structure is seaward of the CCSL. B. Setback lines established under this Land Development Code shall be reviewed upon petition of affected riparian upland owners. The Board of County Commissioners (BCC) of Collier County shall decide, after due public notice and hearing, whether a change in the setback line is justified, and shall notify the petitioner in writing. The present setback lines are presumed to be correct, and no change in setback lines are presumed to be correct, and no change in setback lines shall be made except upon an affirmative showing by petitioner that any construction line establish ed hereunder is a minimum of 150 feet landward of the mean high-water line or seventy-five (75) feet landward of the vegetation line whichever is greater; and that considering ground elevations in relation to historical storm and hurricane tides, predicted maximum wave up rush, beach and offshore ground contours, the vegetation line, erosion trends, the dune or bluff line, if any exist, and existing upland development, that the general public health and welfare are preserved, upland properties protected, and beach and sand dune erosion controlled. 3.A.a Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: Staff Report - PL20200000764 Ritz Carlton CCSV (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) CCSV-PL20200000764, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Road October 22, 2020 Hearing Examiner Page 6 of 8 Staff Comment: The proposed structure is 133.5 feet landward of the mean high-water line, which does meet the LDC requirement that construction must be more than 150 feet landward of the mean high-water line. The proposed structure is 56.9 feet landward of the vegetation line, which does not meet the LDC requirement that construction must be 75 feet landward of the vegetation line (Application and Supporting Documents, page 23). C. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or agency, public or private, to construct, reconstruct, or change existing structures, make any excavation, remove any beach material or otherwise alter existing ground elevations, drive any vehicle on, over or across any sand dune, or damage or cause to be damaged any sand dune, or the vegetation growing thereon and/or seaward of said dune, seaward of the coastal construction setback line, except as hereinafter provided. Staff Comment: The petitioner will provide a dune enhancement plan as required by the GMP policies in Objective 10.4 and LDC section 3.03.06, if applicable. D. If in the immediate contiguous or adjacent area a "number of existing structures" have established a reasonably continuous and uniform construction line closer to the line of mean high water than the line as herein established, and if said existing structures have not been unduly affected by erosion, a proposed structure may be permitted along such line if such proposed structure is also approved by the BCC. Staff Comment: There are a number of existing structures on the subject property immediately to the north as shown on the Existing Conditions Exhibit (Applications and Supporting Documents, page x). The proposed expansion seaward of the CCSL is in line with the existing structures immediately to the north on the subject property, which were approved under previous CCSL variance resolutions. Therefore, it has been shown that in the immediate contiguous or adjacent area a "number of existing structures" have established a reasonably continuous and uniform construction line closer to the line of mean high water than the line as herein established. As to whether the existing structures have been unduly affected by erosion, the applicant has advised that the existing boardwalks have not been unduly affected by erosion. See the attached Application and Supporting Documents pages 18 – 21 for the applicant’s variance justification responses. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This Variance petition was not required to go before the EAC for review and approval. 3.A.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: Staff Report - PL20200000764 Ritz Carlton CCSV (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) CCSV-PL20200000764, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Road October 22, 2020 Hearing Examiner Page 7 of 8 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) approve the CCSL Variance for Petition CCSV-PL20200000764, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Road with the following conditions: Standard conditions: 1. All proposed improvements shall be designed in accordance with the standards of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems and an approved FDEP permit shall be obtained, and copies provided, prior to issuance of a Collier County Building Permit. 2. Construction activities shall not occur within one hundred (100) feet of the sea turtle nesting zone, defined by Collier County Land Development Code Chapter 3, between May 1 – October 31, sea turtle nesting season, without first submitting and obtaining any required FDEP and Collier County Construction in Sea Turtle Nesting Area Permits. 3. Petitioner shall notify Environmental Planning Environmental Staff one week prior to commencing work seaward of the CSSL and shall again contact Staff within one week following completion of work seaward of the CCSL (239-252-2400). 4. Outdoor lighting associated with construction, or development within three hundred (300) feet of the high tide line, shall follow Chapter 3 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 5. Petitioner shall utilize only native coastal dune vegetation for all on-site landscaping seaward of the 1974 Coastal Construction Control Line. 6. Petitioner shall re-vegetate the dune where the dune is devoid of coastal dune vegetation and in any areas disturbed by the proposed improvements. Re-vegetation shall be completed, according to a plan submitted to and approved by Collier County Environmental Staff, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, if applicable. 7. Minor revisions to this variance approval (including changes in siting and structures) may be approved, in writing, by the County Manager, or his/her designee. Site specific conditions: 8. Any vegetation relocated as a result of the boardwalk expansion must survive or be replanted if it does not survive. 9. Any gopher tortoise and or gopher tortoise burrow(s) located onsite must be protected in accordance with LDC 3.04.02. 10. All areas seaward of the CCSL, outside of the footprint of approved structures and improvements, shall be left in their natural condition, or landscaped using native coastal dune vegetation exclusively. 3.A.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: Staff Report - PL20200000764 Ritz Carlton CCSV (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) CCSV-PL20200000764, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Road October 22, 2020 Hearing Examiner Page 8 of 8 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1) Application and Supporting Documents Attachment 2) Exhibit A 3.A.a Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: Staff Report - PL20200000764 Ritz Carlton CCSV (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) 3.A.b Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) 3.A.b Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) 3.A.b Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV)            &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\6XPPDU\ 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU %$<&2/21<'5 6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  1DPH$GGUHVV++51$3/(6//& 5<$1//& 32%2; &LW\6&2776'$/(6WDWH $==LS  0DS1R 6WUDS1R 6HFWLRQ 7RZQVKLS 5DQJH $FUHV£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b Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) 3.A.b Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) 3.A.b Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) 3.A.b Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) 3.A.b Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) 3.A.b Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) 3.A.b Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) 3.A.b Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) &216758&7,21&21752/6(7%$&./,1( &&6/ $1'6(7%$&.9$5,$1&(3/$16)257+(3.A.bPacket Pg. 23Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) &HUWLILFDWHRI$XWKRUL]DWLRQzZZZVWDQWHFFRP3KRQHz)D[3HOLFDQ%D\%OYG1DSOHV)/3.A.bPacket Pg. 24Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) &HUWLILFDWHRI$XWKRUL]DWLRQzZZZVWDQWHFFRP3KRQHz)D[3HOLFDQ%D\%OYG1DSOHV)/3.A.bPacket Pg. 25Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) &HUWLILFDWHRI$XWKRUL]DWLRQzZZZVWDQWHFFRP3KRQHz)D[3HOLFDQ%D\%OYG1DSOHV)/3.A.bPacket Pg. 26Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) &HUWLILFDWHRI$XWKRUL]DWLRQzZZZVWDQWHFFRP3KRQHz)D[3HOLFDQ%D\%OYG1DSOHV)/3.A.bPacket Pg. 27Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) Certificate of Authorization #27013 •• www.stantec.comPhone 239-649-4040••Fax 239-643-57165801 Pelican Bay Blvd., #300, Naples FL, 34108The Contractor shall verify and be responsible forall dimensions. DO NOT scale the drawing - anyerrors or omissions shall be reported to Stantecwithout delay. The Copyrights to all designs anddrawings are the property of Stantec.Reproduction or use for any purpose other thanthat authorized by Stantec is forbidden.3.A.bPacket Pg. 28Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Boulevard Suite 300, Naples FL 34108-2709 \\us0226-ppfss01\workgroup\2156\active\215613645\civil\03_design_and_permitting\00_ccsl_sandbar\ccsl_setback_var_app\ccsl_variance_petition_per_ccme_rev02.docx Name of Applicant: HHR Naples, LLC (Michael E. Lentz) Property ID: 00168360006 Variance Petition Application LDC 9.04.06 Collier County Application No. PL20200000764 Specific Requirements for Variance to the Coastal Construction Setback Line Date Prepared: 7/14/2020 Agents: Ray Piacente III, PMP, LEED AP, Principal and Senior Project Manager with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc and Tim Hall, Principal and Senior Ecologist with Turrell Hall & Associates, Inc. Below find the information required in section 9.04.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code: Section G Procedure for obtaining variance: A written petition requesting a variance from the established setback line shall be filed with the BCC or their designee. The petition shall set forth: a) A description of petitioner’s property to include the information requested on the current Collier County request for a coastal construction set back line variance form. x The Coastal Construction Setback Line Variance Petition Application is filed along with this written petition (Application PL20200000764). b) A description of the established setback line and the line which petitioner wishes to be varied. x The 1974 State of Florida or Natural Resources and Coastal Construction Control Line (Per the revised Map or Record, recorded May, 1980, Coastal Setback Line Book 1 Pages 13-25, Collier County, Florida) c) The justification upon which the petitioner relies for the granting of the variance, to include compliance with the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Conservation and Coastal Management Element. x The expansion of the existing dune cross-over or boardwalk is needed to provide better pedestrian traffic flow and life safety between the bar patrons, resort residents, and guests entering and exiting the beach. The Ritz-Carlton strives to provide the best experience and service for their clientele while putting safety of their guests at the highest level; and it is the Resort’s belief that the current configuration provides a health, safety and welfare concern for the Resort and there is an immediate and significant need to correct this. x The existing dune cross-overs or boardwalks that currently serve the Resort were previously approved under Collier County zoning resolution no’s 83-117 and 95- 247, and the extents of the proposed improvements (consisting of 286 sf) do not extend further seaward than the existing limits of the boardwalk. Additionally, based on limits of the proposed improvements, it should not pose any impacts to the environment or to the adjacent properties to south. x The proposed improvements will be accommodated by a cantilever support system from the existing piles and will have no impacts to the existing dunes and 3.A.b Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Boulevard Suite 300, Naples FL 34108-2709 \\us0226-ppfss01\workgroup\2156\active\215613645\civil\03_design_and_permitting\00_ccsl_sandbar\ccsl_setback_var_app\ccsl_variance_petition_per_ccme_rev02.docx existing vegetation; however, the improvements may require the relocation of a small area of existing vegetation which will be replanted in a location specified by the project ecologist. No existing vegetation shall be removed from the project area limits. x Several variances have been approved by Collier County for the Ritz-Carlton Naples Beach Resort under Collier County zoning resolution no’s 83-117, 95-247, 00-252 and 02-266. These variances have been enclosed as supporting documentation showing the variances issued along this area of coastline. Collier County’s Conservation and Coastal Management Element is divided into thirteen (13) separate goal areas. These are summarized as follows: The applicable responses to each element are listed after each item in italics. 1. Protection of natural resources: a. A previous variance has been granted approval for the existing dune cross-over or boardwalk that is proposed to be modified, and the extents of the proposed improvements (consisting of 286 sf) do not extend further seaward than the existing limits of the boardwalk. The proposed improvements also do not extend further north or south along the beach than other existing components of the boardwalk. The proposed improvements will be accommodated by a cantilever support system from the existing piles and will have no impacts to the existing dunes and existing vegetation; however, the improvements may require the relocation of a small area of existing vegetation which will be replanted in a location specified by the project ecologist. No existing vegetation shall be removed from the project area limits. b. All new exterior lighting will be added to the project. Existing lighting will be relocated to the new handrail and is compliant with the current requirements and guidelines of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) standards for protection of nesting marine turtles and their hatchlings. c. There will be no adverse impact to natural resources as a result of the siting and design of the project. 2. Protection of surface and estuarine water resources: This project does not affect this element. 3. Protection of groundwater resources: This project does not affect this element. 4. Protection of freshwater resources: This project does not affect this element. 5. Protection of mineral and soil resources: This project does not affect this element. 6. Protection of native vegetation and wildlife habitat: a. This project will have no adverse native vegetation and wildlife habitat. The proposed improvements will be accommodated by a cantilever support system from the existing piles and will have no impacts to the existing dunes and existing vegetation; however, 3.A.b Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Boulevard Suite 300, Naples FL 34108-2709 \\us0226-ppfss01\workgroup\2156\active\215613645\civil\03_design_and_permitting\00_ccsl_sandbar\ccsl_setback_var_app\ccsl_variance_petition_per_ccme_rev02.docx the improvements may require the relocation of a small area of existing vegetation which will be replanted in a location specified by the project ecologist. No existing vegetation shall be removed from the project area limits. b. The proposed improvements will be designed to comply with local and state sea turtle lighting requirements for sea turtle protection. The siting of the project will not have a negative impact on their potential for interaction with the natural functions of the beaches and dunes, as the boardwalk will not extend into the potential nesting area and does not change the existing stairway access to the beach from this boardwalk. c. No sand material will be moved from the beach seaward of the 1974 Setback. d. The delivery and staging of materials and construction will be undertaken or supported from the resort side of the project and without the need to utilize the beach for access. e. An environmental assessment of the native vegetation was conducted and a FLUCFCS Map was generated and is included with this variance request. There will be no impact to the native dune vegetation. Additionally, a gopher tortoise survey was completed as part of this project, and there are three active gopher tortoise burrows approximately 35- feet to 47-feet from the proposed boardwalk improvements. The required 25-foot buffer will be provided and maintained, and no work will impact the burrows. A pre- construction survey will also be conducted to ensure that no tortoises have moved into the 25-foot buffer prior to the start of the improvements. 7. Protection of fisheries and wildlife: a. A gopher tortoise survey was completed as part of this project, and there are three active gopher tortoise burrows approximately 35-feet to 47-feet from the proposed boardwalk improvements. The required 25-foot buffer will be provided and maintained, and no work will impact the burrows. A pre-construction survey will also be conducted to ensure that no tortoises have moved into the 25-foot buffer prior to the start of the improvements. b. Since the project is proposed to be undertaken during the summer months, a Collier County sea turtle permit will also be obtained for the work. This will outline the management guidelines and any FWC criteria established for the project to ensure that no sea turtle nesting is disturbed or impacted by the proposed improvements. 8. Maintenance of existing air quality: This project does not affect this element. 9. Management of hazardous material and hazardous wastes: This project does not affect this element. 10. Protection of coastal resources: a. This project will have no adverse impact. The proposed improvements will be accommodated by a cantilever support system from the existing piles and will have no impacts to the existing dunes and existing vegetation; however, the improvements may require the relocation of a small area of existing vegetation which will be replanted in a location specified by the project ecologist. No existing vegetation shall be removed from the project area limits. 3.A.b Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Boulevard Suite 300, Naples FL 34108-2709 \\us0226-ppfss01\workgroup\2156\active\215613645\civil\03_design_and_permitting\00_ccsl_sandbar\ccsl_setback_var_app\ccsl_variance_petition_per_ccme_rev02.docx b. The proposed improvements will be designed to comply with local and state sea turtle lighting requirements for sea turtle protection. The siting of the project will not have a negative impact on their potential for interaction with the natural functions of the beaches and dunes. c. The delivery and staging of materials and construction will be undertaken or supported from the resort side and without the need to utilize the beach for access. 11. Protection of historic resources: This project will not affect this element. 12. Hurricane evacuation and sheltering: This project does not affect this element. 13. Avoiding duplication of regulations: Not applicable. 3.A.b Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) 3.A.bPacket Pg. 33Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) Certificate of Authorization #27013 •• www.stantec.com Phone 239-649-4040 •• Fax 239-643-5716 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd., Naples FL 34108 The Contractor shall verify and be responsible for all dimensions. DO NOT scale the drawing - any errors or omissions shall be reported to Stantec without delay. The Copyrights to all designs and drawings are the property of Stantec. Reproduction or use for any purpose other than that authorized by Stantec is forbidden. 3.A.b Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) 3.A.bPacket Pg. 35Attachment: Applications and Supporting Documents (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) Exhibit A 3.A.c Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Exhibit A Legal Description (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) 3.A.d Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Sign Affidavit (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) 3.A.e Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Hybrid Meeting Waiver (13655 : PL20200000764 - Ritz Carlton CCSV) 10/22/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.B Item Summary: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20190000959 – St. George Group, Corp. requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance Number 05-53, the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD, to modify Condition 2.12.B and the PUD master plan to require the wall along Tract B only, to modify Condition 2.14.A.3 to require interconnection of the internal sidewalk concurrent with the road interconnection from Tract B to Tract A consistent with LDC Section 6.06.02.B, and revisions to PUD Monitoring, Environmental and Housing conditions so that current Land Development Code standards and policies apply, for Tract B of the PUD property consisting of 6.7 ± acres, located on the east side of Santa Barbara Blvd, approximately 2,300 feet south of Radio Road, in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Commissioner District 3 Meeting Date: 10/22/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Tim Finn 10/08/2020 10:42 AM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 10/08/2020 10:42 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Rose Burke Review Item Completed 10/09/2020 6:49 PM Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Completed 10/12/2020 2:46 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 10/13/2020 2:24 PM Zoning Anita Jenkins Review Item Completed 10/13/2020 4:19 PM Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending 10/22/2020 9:00 AM 3.B Packet Pg. 39 PDI-PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Revised: October 8, 2020 Page 1 of 10 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 22, 2020 SUBJECT: PDI-PL20190000959; SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS RPUD PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Agent: Armando Bucelo, Jr St. George Group, Corp. Laura DeJohn, AICP Johnson Engineering, Inc. 6303 Blue Lagoon Dr. #390 Miami, FL 33126 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Hearing Examiner approve an insubstantial change to Ordinance Number 05-53, the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD, to modify Condition 2.12.B and the PUD master plan to require the wall along Tract B only, to modify Condition 2.14.A.3 to require interconnection of the internal sidewalk concurrent with the road interconnection from Tract B to Tract A consistent with LDC Section 6.06.02.B, and revisions to PUD Monitoring, Environmental and Housing conditions so that current Land Development Code standards and policies apply, for Tract B of the PUD property. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consists of 6.7 ± acres, located on the east side of Santa Barbara Blvd, approximately 2,300 feet south of Radio Road, in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (see location map on page 5) 3.B.a Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: Staff Report - Santa Barbara Landings PDI (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) PDI-PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Revised: October 8, 2020 Page 2 of 10 PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: In 2005, the 41.6-acre property was rezoned from Residential Multi Family-6 (RMF-6) Zoning District to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) pursuant to Ordinance 05-53 to add 43 mixed residential dwelling units to the 248 existing dwelling units for a total of 291 dwelling units. Per the October 31, 2019 PUD Monitoring Report, a total of 248 dwelling units have been constructed in the RPUD. The ±41.6‐acre RPUD is comprised of two development tracts. At the time of original rezoning from RFM‐ 6 to PUD, the northerly ±35.3‐acre tract (Tract A) was developed with 248 multifamily dwelling units, which is now a condominium community known as Granada Lakes Villas. The southerly +6.3 acres designated as Tract B was approved for a maximum of 43 mixed residential dwelling units. Tract B remains undeveloped and is not part of the condominium and is independent from that condominium association. The petitioner for the original rezoning remains the owner of Tract B and is requesting an Insubstantial Change (PDI) to the RPUD. The proposed changes are to clarify the conditions applicable to the Tract B development site by eliminating outdated requirements or modifying to clarify applicability of the conditions to the respective Tract. Changes are numbered #1 through #4, addressing conditions related to a #1‐wall, #2‐ sidewalk, #3‐environmental, and #4‐housing, as described below: CHANGE #1: Landscape Buffers, Berms, Fences and Walls Condition 2.12.B requires that the eight (8') foot high precast wall shown on the conceptual master plan shall be constructed concurrent with development of the residential units in Tract B. The PUD master plan shows the wall extending for the full length of Tract A and Tract B along the eastern PUD boundary. This full-length totals approximately 2,757 feet (just over half a mile). A change is proposed to Condition 2.12.B and the PUD master plan to require the wall along the eastern boundary of Tract B only. CHANGE #2: Sidewalks, bike lanes and bike paths Condition 2.14.A.3 requires that an internal sidewalk connection from the southernmost development tract (Tract B) to the existing pool/club area shall be provided at the time of construction within Tract B. Condition 2.14.A.3 is proposed to be modified to require interconnection of the internal sidewalk concurrent with the road interconnection from Tract B to Tract A, consistent with LDC Section 6.06.02.B. The construction of a sidewalk connecting new residents of Tract B to the common area and amenities of a separate condominium association in Tract A does not appropriately relate to the development of residential units in Tract B. It is not feasible for the developer of Tract B to construct in common areas of Granada Lakes Villas, which has a separate condominium association. The minimum standard for a 6‐foot wide sidewalk is identified in PUD Section 2.14.A.2. The interconnection of the internal sidewalks as proposed is consistent with County standards to provide linkages to serve pedestrian needs between development areas. 3.B.a Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: Staff Report - Santa Barbara Landings PDI (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) PDI-PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Revised: October 8, 2020 Page 3 of 10 CHANGE #3: Environmental Conditions in 5.10.A, C D, E, F, G, H and I refer to requirements for: exotic vegetation management plan, conservation easement dedication, habitat management plan, preserve management plan, and that a replanting plan for the re‐created preserve areas shall be provided at the time of next development order submittal. The source of the original conditions is the County Land Development Code. These conditions are proposed to be stricken from the PUD Document because they are redundant with the applicable standards of the LDC. No change is proposed to the required preserve areas or associated easement dedication, or requirements for management plan or re‐created preserves. CHANGE #4: Housing Conditions – the following changes are proposed: • 5.11.A Contribution. The developer or successors and assigns shall pay the sum of $1,000.00 to Collier County from the closing of each of the dwelling units constructed within Tract “B" of the RPUD. The payment shall be made within seven (7) days of the closing of the residential unit. Condition 5.11.A is proposed to be removed. Removal of this contribution commitment qualifies as a minor text change per LDC Section 10.02.13.E.3.c. Because the petitioner requests additional proposed changes to the RPUD, this change is proposed as part of an insubstantial change (PDI) request. • 5.11.B Primary residence. The developer or successors and assigns shall require a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the dwelling units developed within the RPUD to be initially sold to individuals or families that use the dwelling unit as their primary residence. The deed to the initial purchaser shall include a restriction that the initial purchaser shall use the unit as their primary residence. Condition 5.11.B is proposed to be amended to reflect the condition applies to Tract B. Property Appraiser records and primary residency records are not available to determine whether 50% of the dwelling units within the RPUD sold to primary residents. This condition is proposed to be clarified to reflect that the condition applies to Tract B, the only developable tract. • 5.11.C Maximum price point. The developer or successors and assigns agrees to make available for sale a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the dwelling units at a sales price less than $240,000. Condition 5.11.C is proposed to be removed. 3.B.a Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: Staff Report - Santa Barbara Landings PDI (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) PDI-PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Revised: October 8, 2020 Page 4 of 10 Property Appraiser records document that this condition has been met for the RPUD. Attachment I – Backup Materials (Narrative of Request, Justification & GMP Consistency, Attachment A Table) lists all initial transactions that occurred when Granada Lakes Villas condominiumized, demonstrating 151 units sold at a sales price less than $240,000, which satisfies the minimum 50% of the total allowable 291 units within the RPUD. Thus, sales price affordability goals have been met by this project, and it is appropriate to remove Condition 5.11.C. • 5.11.D Employment in Collier County with income requirement. The developer or successors and assigns agrees to sell a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the total number of dwelling units constructed within the RPUD to persons employed in Collier County and earning a family income ranging between 100% and 125% of the County's median income. Condition 5.11.D is proposed to be amended to reflect the condition applies to Tract B and is to serve households earning 140% or less of the County’s median income. This RPUD is subject to standard density calculated according to the base density and residential density band in proximity to an Activity Center. There is no affordable housing density bonus associated with this RPUD. Employment records and income level records are not available to determine whether purchasers of 10% of the total number of dwelling units within the RPUD have met the employment status and income levels referenced in Condition 5.11.D. This condition is proposed to be clarified to reflect applicability to Tract B, the only developable tract, and that the target income level is households earning 140% or less of the County’s median income. This update to the income level was identified by Cormac Giblin in reference to current County housing policies. The proposed updates maintain the objective to provide new housing options that are affordable to the workforce within Collier County. Intentionally blank 3.B.a Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Staff Report - Santa Barbara Landings PDI (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) PDI-PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Revised: October 8, 2020 Page 5 of 10 3.B.aPacket Pg. 44Attachment: Staff Report - Santa Barbara Landings PDI (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings PDI-PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Revised: October 8, 2020 Page 6 of 10 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the boundaries of Tract B within the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD: North: Multi-family residences (Santa Barbara Landings RPUD); maximum density: 7DU/A East: Single and multifamily residential, (Plantation PUD); maximum density: 4.99DU/A South: Calusa Park Elementary School and undeveloped acreage, zoned Bembridge EMS Complex PUD; maximum density: 6DU/A West: Santa Barbara RD, then developed with golf course and multi-family, zoned Berkshire Lakes PUD; maximum density: 3.96DU/A Source: Johnson Engineering, Inc. 3.B.a Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Staff Report - Santa Barbara Landings PDI (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) PDI-PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Revised: October 8, 2020 Page 7 of 10 STAFF ANALYSIS: Comprehensive Planning: Because this application is not adding uses or increasing the intensity of the previously approved uses in the Santa Barbara RPUD, it is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. See Attachment D for the complete report from Comprehensive Planning staff. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). No revisions to the environmental portions of the PUD petition are being made. The proposal is consistent with the CCME. Stormwater Review: Stormwater Management staff has evaluated the proposed changes to the PUD documents and found no issues with consistency. Landscaping Review: The buffers labeled on the updated Master Plan are consistent with the LDC and with section 2.12 C and 2.14 B of the original PUD. Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. The existing preserve areas will not be impacted by the proposed petition. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff reviewed the application and found this project consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). There is no increase in the number of residential dwelling units/traffic generation, no changes to the master plan including point(s) of access or circulation, and no changes to the developer commitments beyond those related to Tract B; therefore there are no transportation planning impacts related to this request. Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 of the Land Development Code set forth the criteria by which insubstantial amendments to a PUD Master Plan and/or minor text changes to a PUD document are to be reviewed before they can be approved. The criteria and a response to each have been listed as follows: 10.02.13.E.1 a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)? No, there is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD. b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? 3.B.a Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Staff Report - Santa Barbara Landings PDI (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) PDI-PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Revised: October 8, 2020 Page 8 of 10 No, there is no proposed increase in the number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development. c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development in excess of five (5) percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five (5) acres in area? No, there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? The land uses within the RPUD are limited to residential and preserve uses. The RPUD does not contain nonresidential uses (institutional, commercial or industrial) land uses, therefore, no change or relocation of nonresidential land uses is proposed. e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities? No, there are no additional impacts resulting from this amendment. As noted above the there is no increase in the number of residential dwelling units/traffic generation, no changes to the master plan including point(s) of access or circulation, and no changes to the developer commitments beyond those related to Tract B; therefore there are no transportation planning impacts related to this request. f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? No, there are no additional impacts resulting from this amendment. As noted above the there is no increase in the number of residential dwelling units/traffic generation, no changes to the master plan including point(s) of access or circulation, and no changes to the developer commitments beyond those related to Tract B; therefore there are no transportation planning impacts related to this request. g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? Staff anticipates the proposed changes will not impact or increase stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharge beyond the permittable limits of the site development. h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? 3.B.a Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: Staff Report - Santa Barbara Landings PDI (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) PDI-PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Revised: October 8, 2020 Page 9 of 10 No, there will be no incompatible relationships with abutting land uses. i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? No, Staff from Comprehensive Planning staff determined the proposed changes to the PUD Document would be consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Both environmental and Transportation Planning staff reviewed this petition, and no changes to the PUD Document are proposed that would be deemed inconsistent with the CCME or the Transportation Element of the GMP. This petition does not propose any increase in density or intensity of the permitted land uses. j. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to Sec. 380.06 (19), F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec. 380.06 (19)(e)2., F.S., and any changes to a DRI/PUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under Section 10.02.13 of the LDC. The project is not a DRI. k. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under Section(s) 10.02.13 E.? Based upon the analysis provide above, the proposed change is not deemed to be substantial. Section 10.02.13.E.2 Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original application? No, the proposed changes do not affect the original analysis and findings of the original PUD application in Petition PUDZ-2003-AR-4493. An excerpt from the staff report prepared for that petition is attached as Attachment E that contains the PUD Findings of Fact from Petition PUDZ-2003-AR-4493. STAFF RESPONSE: March 17, 2020 – Letter of Concern Staff had corresponded with the president of the Granada Lakes Village Condominium Association/Santa Barbara Landings Property Owners Association with issues concerning this 3.B.a Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: Staff Report - Santa Barbara Landings PDI (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) PDI-PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Revised: October 8, 2020 Page 10 of 10 petition pertaining to Tract A The twelve points are listed in this letter with staff’s response. (See Attachment F – March 17, 2020 Letter of Concern with Staffs response). DEVIATION DISCUSSION: No deviations are being requested as part of this application. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on January 30, 2020 at Collier Area Transit, 8300 Radio Rd. Naples, Florida. The meeting commenced at 5:30 p.m. and ended at approximately 6:30 p.m. Laura DeJohn of Johnson Engineering introduced the team and county staff. Laura gave a presentation and background of the petition. She explained that the property is for sale and interested developers have identified zoning conditions to make the project feasible. Laura explained each modification within the PDI petition and then opened the meeting for public attendees. The issues discussed with the public were building height, road connection, drainage, Tract B amenities, affordable housing changes, Tract B ownership, and the concentration of low - income people into one area. The NIM summary, sign in sheet, and NIM materials are included in Attachment I. EAC REVIEW: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2 -1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve Petition PDI- PL20190000959. Attachments: A) Santa Barbara Landings PUD document - strike underline B) Santa Barbara Landings PUD document - clean version C) Master Plan Revisions D) FLUE Consistency Review dated 7-23-20 E) Findings of Fact - PUDZ-03-AR-4493 F) March 17, 2020 Letter of Concern with Staff Response G) Other Concern Correspondences H) HEX Hybrid Meeting Waiver I) Application/Backup Materials J) Hearing Property Sign 3.B.a Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Staff Report - Santa Barbara Landings PDI (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 41.6± Acres Located in Section 04, Township 50 S, Range 26 E Collier County, Florida PREPARED FOR: Santa Barbara Garden Villas, LLC 1401 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 401 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 And St. George Group, Corporation 1401 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 40I Coral Gables, Florida 33134 6303 Blue Lagoon Drive Suite 390 Miami, FL 33126 PREPARED BY: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 And D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates 3800 Via del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Insubstantial Change for St. George Group, Corp by: Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 DATE FILED DATE APPROVED BY CPCC DATE APPROVED BY BCC 10-11-2005 ORDINANCE NUMBER 2005-53 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE: _____________ EXHIBIT "A" 3.B.b Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLE i STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE ii SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION I-1 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS II-1 SECTION III RESIDENTIAL "R" DEVELOPMENT AREA III-1 SECTION IV PRESERVE "P" AREA IV-1 SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS V-1 3.B.b Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES EXHIBIT A CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT B SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBIT C LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT D BOUNDARY SURVEY TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS III-3 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline i 3.B.b Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Santa Barbara Garden Villas, LLC and St. George Group, Corporation intends to create a This Residential Planned Unit Development is on approximately 41.6± acres of land located in Section 04., Township 50 S, Range 26 E, Collier County, Florida. Approximately 6.3 acres of the property is encumbered with a 100' wide roadway easement for Santa Barbara Boulevard, making the net site approximately 35.3 acres. The name of the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) shall be Santa Barbara Landings RPUD. The development of the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as established in the Growth Management Plan. The development will be consistent with the policies of the land development regulations adopted under the Growth Management Plan and applicable regulations for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is located within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Sub-District, as identified on the Future Land Use Map. 2. The density provided for in the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD complies with the Density Rating System contained in the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. The subject property is located within the residential density band, which extends from the Mixed-use activity center located at the intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Davis Boulevard. The density permissible is 4 dwelling units per acre. Up to 3 dwelling units per acre may be added within the density band, bringing the permissible base density to 7 dwelling units per acre. Base density Density band Maximum permitted density Requested density 4.0 du/acre + 3.0du/acre = 7.0 du/acre 7.0 du/acre (291 units) At the time of the rezoning application, 248 multiple-family dwellings exist on the site. The subject rezoning will add a maximum of 43 additional dwelling units for a maximum total of 291 dwelling units. All property within the RPUD boundary shall be utilized in calculating the project density. 3. The project development is compatible and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). 4. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with the applicable land development regulations as required in Objective 3 of the FLUE, except as may be modified in this RPUD document 5. All final local development orders for this project are subject to the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance as required in Objective 2 of the FLUE. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline ii 3.B.b Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 6. The design of Santa Barbara Landings RPUD protects the function of the existing drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as required in Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element. 7. This project shall be subject to applicable Sections of the LDC at the time of development order approval, except as otherwise provided herein. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline iii 3.B.b Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE Section I sets forth the location and ownership of the property, and describes the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name Santa Barbara Landings RPUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property being 41.6 acres more or less, is described as: The west half (W. ½) of the west half (W. ½) of the northwest quarter (N.W. ¼) of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, all being situated in Collier County, Florida, less the north 50 feet thereof. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The property is currently owned by: TRACT A: unit owners of the Santa Barbara Garden Villas, LLC Landings Property Owner’s Association Inc. and Granada Lakes Villas Condominium Association Inc., whose address is 145 Santa Clara Drive, Naples, FL 34104, and TRACT B: St. George Group, Corporation, whose address is: 1401 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 401 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 6303 Blue Lagoon Drive Suite 390, Miami, FL 33126 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A. The project is located in Section 04, Township 50, Range 26 and is generally bordered on the north by Radio Road, on the east by Plantation PUD; on the south by Bembridge PUD on the west by Santa Barbara Boulevard. B. The zoning classification of the subject property at the time of RPUD application is RMF-6. C. According to FEMA/FIRM Map Panel Number 120067 415 D, dated June 3, 1986, the property is located within Zone X. D. Soils on the site generally include Hallandale fine sand and Boca, Rivera, Limestone Substratum and Copeland fine sand depressional. E. Existing vegetation on the site consists of melaleuca, Brazilian Pepper, palmetto prairie, pine flatwoood, cypress, Cabbage Palm and disturbed lands. Wetland areas have been heavily impacted by melaleuca. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline I-1 3.B.b Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) F. According to the Collier County Drainage Atlas, the site is located in the Lely Canal Basin. The conceptual water management plan is depicted in the Surface Water Management Report, which accompanied the rezone application submittal. 1.5 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance is known and cited as the "Santa Barbara Landings Residential Planned Unit Development Ordinance." 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline I-2 3.B.b Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PURPOSE Section II delineates and generally describes the plan of development and identifies relationships to applicable County ordinances, policies, and procedures. 2.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT A. Santa Barbara Landings RPUD is a mixed-use residential project and will consist of two development parcels and multiple preservation areas. Categories of land uses include those for residential and preserve areas. The Residential areas are designed to accommodate single-family attached, duplex and multiple family dwellings. The overall project density is 7 dwelling units per acre and the maximum units permitted in the RPUD shall be 291 units. B. Exhibit "A" depicts the RPUD Master Plan. The RPUD Master Plan includes a table that summarizes land use acreage. The location, size and configuration of individual tracts shall be determined at the time of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plat approval. 2.3 COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY ORDINANCES A. Regulations for development of Santa Barbara Landings RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate which authorize the construction of improvements. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards then the provisions of the most similar district in the Land Development Code shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. C. Unless modified, waived or excepted from this RPUD Document or associated exhibits, the provisions of other sections of the land development codes, where applicable, remain in full force and effect with respect to the development of the land that comprises this RPUD. D. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Chapter 6, Adequate Public Facilities, of the Land Development Code. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline II- 1 3.B.b Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2.4 LAND USES Land uses are generally depicted on the RPUD Master Plan, Exhibit A. The specific location and size of individual tracts and the assignment of square footage or units shall be determined by the developer at the time of site development plan approval, preliminary subdivision plat approval, or final subdivision plat approval subject to the provisions of Chapter 10 of the Collier County LDC. 2.5 USE OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY The Developer may utilize land within the rights-of-way within the RPUD for landscaping, decorative entranceways, and unified signage. This utilization is subject to review and administrative approval during the development review process by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator for engineering and safety considerations. 2.6 MODEL HOMES SALES OFFICE AND CONSTRUCTION OFFICE A. Construction offices and other uses and structures related to the promotion and sale of real estate such as, but not limited to, pavilions, parking areas, and signs, shall be permitted principal uses throughout the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD. These uses shall be subject to the requirements of Chapter 5 and Chapter IO of the LDC. B. Model Homes may be permitted in multi-family and townhome buildings may be utilized for wet or dry models, subject to the time frames specified in Chapter 5 of the LDC. 2.7 CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO RPUD DOCUMENT OR RPUD MASTER PLAN Changes and amendments may be made to this RPUD Ordinance or RPUD Master Plan as provided in Chapter 10 of the LDC. Minor changes and refinements as described herein may be made by the Developer in connection with any type of development or permit application required by LDC. 2.8 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS A minimum of 30% of the project (12.48± acres) shall be devoted to usable open space. 2.9 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS A minimum of three (3) acres of native vegetation shall be maintained on the subject site through a combination of preservation of existing native vegetation and revegetation of native vegetation. The areas of retained native vegetation and replanted native vegetation are shown as Preserve areas on the Conceptual Master Plan, Exhibit A. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline II-2 3.B.b Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2.10 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE One or more Property Owner's Association (POA) will provide common area maintenance. The POA, as applicable, shall be responsible for the operation, maintenance, and management of the surface water and stormwater management systems and preserves serving Santa Barbara Landings RPUD, in accordance with any applicable permits from the South Florida Water Management District. 2.11 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS A. The Collier County Planned Unit Development District is intended to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership as set forth in Chapter 2 of the LDC. I. Individual Projects a) Site Planning: Each distinct project within the RPUD will provide an aesthetically appealing, identifiable path of entry for pedestrians and vehicles. The orientation of buildings and structures will be sensitive to adjacent land uses and the surrounding community. b) Landscaping: Where applicable, plantings along public rights-of way will be complimentary to streetscape landscaping. 2.12 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERMS, FENCES AND WALLS A. Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls are generally permitted as a principal use throughout the RPUD, excluding preserves. B. The maximum fence, wall or berm height internal to the RPUD shall be eight (8) feet, not including those portions of walls incorporated into project identification signs. The maximum fence height shall be measured relative to the greater of the crown of the adjacent roadway or the adjacent minimum finished floor, as applicable. The eight (8') foot high precast wall shown on the conceptual master plan shall be constructed along the eastern boundary of Tract B concurrent with development of the residential units in tract B. C. Perimeter Buffers abutting rights-of-way shall be permitted to deviate from the required 20' wide Type D buffer, to permit a Type D buffer an average of 20' in width, with no part of the buffer being less than 15' in width. The minimum area for the combined buffers along Radio Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard shall be 66,129 square feet (1.52± acres). 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline II-3 3.B.b Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2.13 SIGNAGE A. GENERAL Signage shall be consistent with Section 5.06 of the LDC. 2.14 SUBSTITUTIONS TO SUBDIVISION DESIGN STANDARDS / DEVIATIONS 1. The Developer reserves the right to request substitutions to subdivision improvement and utility design standards in accordance with Chapter 10 of the LDC. A. Chapter 6, Sidewalks, bike lanes and bike paths 1. Existing site constraints prohibit retrofitting of the site with sidewalks meeting standards in Chapter 6 of the LDC. 2. A six (6) foot wide sidewalk shall be provided on only one (1) side of the internal local or private roadway exceeding one thousand (1,000) feet in length serving the project's additional 43 unit component. 3. An internal sidewalk connection from the southernmost development tract (Tract B) to the existing pool/club area shall be provided at the time of construction within Tract B. The developer of Tract B shall construct a sidewalk interconnection concurrently with the road interconnection from Tract B to Tract A. The developer of Tract B shall coordinate with the School District of Collier County to construct a sidewalk interconnection from Tract B to the adjacent school property at time of Tract B development permitting. 4. The developer shall make payment-in-lieu of construction of the sidewalk within Santa Barbara Boulevard, due to its programmed improvement in the five-year work program. B. Section 4.06.00, Landscaping, buffering and vegetation retention 1. Perimeter Buffers abutting rights-of-way shall be permitted to deviate from the required 20' wide Type D buffer, to permit a Type D buffer an average of 20' in width, with no part of the buffer being less than 15' in width. The minimum area for the combined buffers along Radio Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard shall be 66,129 square feet (1.52± acres). C. Construction Standards Manual, Streets and access improvements 1. Construction Standards Manual, Street Right-of-Way Width Street right-of-way width: The minimum right-of-way width to be utilized for local streets and cul-de-sacs shall be forty (40) feet. Drive aisles serving multi-family tracts shall not be required to meet this standard. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline II-4 3.B.b Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2. Construction Standards Manual, Dead-end Streets Cul-de-sacs may exceed a length of one thousand (1,000) feet. 3. Construction Standards Manual, Intersection Radii Intersection radii: Street intersections shall be provided with a minimum of a twenty five (25) foot radius (face of curb) for all internal project streets and a thirty-five (35) foot radius for intersections at project entrances. 2.15 GENERAL PERMITTED USES A. Certain uses shall be considered general permitted uses throughout the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD except in the Preserve Areas. General permitted uses are those uses that generally serve the entire RPUD or distinct projects there within. B. General Permitted Uses: 1. Essential services as set forth under Chapter 2 of the LDC. 2. Water management facilities and related structures. 3. Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or other architectural or structural bank treatments. 4. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures. 5. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the Developer and Developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses. 6. Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.12 of this document. 7. Signage. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline II-5 3.B.b Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SECTION III RESIDENTIAL "R" DEVELOPMENT AREAS 3.1 PURPOSE Section III establishes permitted uses and development regulations for areas within the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD that are designated Residential "R" on the RPUD Master Plan. 3.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION A. Areas designated as "R" on the RPUD Master Plan are designed to accommodate multiple family residential types, recreational uses, essential services, and customary accessory uses. Acreage is based on a conceptual design. Actual acreage of the development and preserve areas shall be established at the time of Site Development Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance with the Collier County Land Development Code. Areas designated as "R" accommodate internal roadways, open space, parks and amenity areas, lakes and water management facilities, and other similar facilities that are accessory or customary to residential development. B. Areas designated as "R" are intended to provide a maximum of 291 dwelling units. 3.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES A. Principal Uses and Structures 1. Single-family attached and detached. 2. Duplex and two-family. 3. Multiple-family. 4. Townhomes B. Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Common indoor and outdoor recreational facilities. 2. Sales and leasing facilities. 3. Clubhouse, meeting rooms. 4. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted in this area. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline III-1 3.B.b Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Table I sets forth the development standards for land uses within the "R" Residential District. B. Required Parking: Parking within the residential area shall be provided based on the following standards: 1. Recreation Facilities - 2 per court, 1 per 600 square feet of building area, 1 per 200 square feet of pool water area. No additional parking shall be required for outdoor playground facilities. Up to 10 parking spaces per recreational facility may be directly loaded off a private roadway serving the recreational area. 2. Temporary Model Sales Facility - minimum 6 parking spaces per building. Parking for models or temporary sales facilities shall be permitted to back directly onto private roadways serving the units. C. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein or within the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD, shall be in accordance with the Land Development Code in effect at the time of Site Development Plan approval. Unless otherwise indicated, required yards, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. D. Development standards for uses not specifically set forth in Table I shall be established during the Site Development Plan Approval as set forth in Chapter 4 of the Land Development Code in accordance with those standards of the zoning district which is most similar to the proposed use. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline III-2 3.B.b Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) TABLE I SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR "R" RESIDENTIAL AREAS Permitted Uses and Standards Single Family Detached Zero Lot Line Duplex, Single Family Attached and Townhouse5 Multi-Family Dwellings 5 Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF NA NA Minimum Lot Width 50' 40' NA NA Minimum Lot Depth 100' 100' NA NA Front Yard Setback1 20'/23' 20'/23 20'/23' 20'/23' Side Yard Setback 6' 0' or 6' 0' or6' 15' Rear Yard Setback2 15' 15' 15' 15' Santa Barbara Blvd. R-O-W Setback 20' 20' 20' 20' Rear Yard Accessory Setback2 10' 10' 10' 10' Preserve Setback3 Accessory Principal 10' 25' 10' 25' 10' 25' 10' 25' Maximum Zoned Building Height 2 Stories or 30' 2 Stories or 30' 2 Stories or 30' 2 Stories or 30' Distance Between4 Detached Principal Structures 12' 12' 12' 15' Floor Area Min. (SF) 750 SF 750 SF 750 SF 750 SF All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 Front yards shall be measured as follows: A. If the parcel is served by a public right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. B. If the parcel is served by a private road or access easement, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). For multiple family buildings served by an unplatted driveway, no setback shall be required; however, adequate stacking shall be provided to accommodate vehicular parking. For tract B, front entry garage setback shall be a minimum of 23' from private row or back edge of sidewalk. C. For structures with side or rear entry garages, the minimum front yard may be reduced to 12'. 2Rear yards for principal and accessory structures on lots and tracts which abut lake, or open space (non-preserve) may be reduced to O' feet; however, a reduced building setback shall not reduce the width of any required landscape buffer, as may be applicable. 3 For purposes of this Section, accessory structures shall include but not be limited to attached screen enclosures and roofed lanais. 4 A minimum building separation of twelve (12) feet between detached structures. Detached garages may be separated by a minimum of ten (10) feet. 5Attached single-family and multi-family structures within Tract B shall not exceed 4 dwelling units per structure. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline III-3 3.B.b Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SECTION IV PRESERVE "P" AREAS 4.1 PURPOSE Section IV establishes permitted uses and development regulations for areas within Santa Barbara Landings RPUD that are designated as Preserve "P" on the RPUD Master Plan. 4.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as "P" on the RPUD Master Plan are designed to accommodate natural systems existing or created as preserves and limited water management uses and functions. 4.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES A. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, subject to review and approval by local, state & federal agencies as required, for other than the following: B. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1. Boardwalks and nature trails (excluding impervious paved trails). 2. Water management facilities. 3. Any other preserve and related use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals determines to be compatible in the Preserve Area. 4.4 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS A. Building setbacks shall be 20 feet from the RPUD boundary for any permitted structure. B. Maximum zoned height for any structure shall be 20'. 4.5 PRESERVE AREA ADJUSTMENTS The proposed preserve areas depicted on the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Master Plan are intended to meet the native vegetation requirements of the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Collier County LDC. Adjustments may be made to the location of the preservation areas at the time of preliminary plat or site development plan approval based on jurisdictional agency permit requirements. Approximately 6 acres of native vegetation exists on-site at the time of rezoning application. Through retention of existing native vegetation and revegetation of open 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline IV-1 3.B.b Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) spaces on-site, the developer shall provide a minimum of 3 acres of on-site native vegetation, which shall consist of a minimum of 1.5 acres of retained vegetation and 1.5 acres of replanted and enhanced native vegetation. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline IV-2 3.B.b Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the commitments for the development of this project. 5.2 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with Final Site Development Plans, Final Subdivision Plans and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this RPUD, in effect at the time of Final Plat, Final Site Development Plan approval or building permit application as the case may be. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the official County Land Development Code shall apply to this project even if the land within the RPUD is not to be platted. The developer, his successor and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this document. These developer commitments will be enforced through provisions agreed to be included in the declaration of covenants and restrictions or similar recorded instrument. Such provisions must be enforceable by lot owners against the developer, it successors and assigns, regardless of turnover or not to any property or homeowners' association. The developer, his successor or assignee, shall follow the RPUD Master Plan and the regulations of this RPUD as adopted and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor in title or assignee is subject to the commitments within this Agreement. 5.3 RPUD MASTER PLAN A. Exhibit "A", RPUD Master Plan illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed area, lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as Final Platting or Site Development Plan approval. Subject to the provisions of Chapter 10 of the LDC, amendments may be made from time to time. 5.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT/PUD MONITORING REPORT A. The landowners shall proceed and be governed according to the time limits pursuant to Chapter 10 of the LDC. B. Monitoring Report: An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Chapter 10 of the LDC. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-1 3.B.b Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD Insubstantial Change approval dated__________2020, the Managing Entity for Tract B is St. George Group, Corp. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 5.5 ENGINEERING A. This project shall be required to meet all County Ordinances in effect at the time final construction documents are submitted for development approval. B. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with appropriate provisions of the LDC. 5.6 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT In accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), this project shall be designed for a storm event of 3-day duration and 25-year return frequency. A. The project will be permitted with the South Florida Water Management District and copies of the applicable permits will be provided to Collier County prior to issuance of applicable County permits. B. Existing lakes already constructed as of the effective date of this regulation shall be allowed to continue to exist in accordance with the cross sections shown on Surface Water Management Plan, Exhibit "B". Any new lakes must meet the requirements of the then current LDC. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-2 3.B.b Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 5.7 UTILITIES A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission and interim water and/or sewage treatment facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time approvals are requested. C. Water and wastewater systems shall be constructed in accordance with State of Florida Laws and Collier County's Codes and Ordinances. D. All construction plans, technical specifications and hydraulic design reports are to be reviewed and approved in writing by the Engineering Services Department of the Community Development and Environmental Services Division prior to commencement of construction E. Upon completion of construction, all water and wastewater systems within the project shall be tested and must meet minimum County standards and requirements. The system(s), or a portion thereof, that is found to meet the requirements set forth in item #5 below, may then be conveyed to the County for ownership and maintenance. F. If County's utility system does not have access readily available to serve a project within the County's service area, extensions to the County infrastructure may be required. All required extensions shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer, fiscally and otherwise (time and schedule), unless such extension has been previously defined in the County Water and/or Wastewater Master Plan. In such case, the developer may negotiate an upsizing agreement with the County. If it is determined by the County that neither of these two options are feasible, in interim system may be considered. G. Items on the following list shall be conveyed to the County for ownership and maintenance upon approval from the Board of County Commissioners if they are located within a County right-of-way or County Utility Easement (CUE), are in compliance with the latest revision of the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance, and are connected to the County Water, Wastewater or Reclaimed Systems: 1. Potable water lines 6" or larger, including water meters and backflow devices that are not on fire lines. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-3 3.B.b Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2. Gravity wastewater lines 8" or larger. 3. Wastewater lift stations that are located within a CUE. 4. Force mains 4" or larger. 5. CUE's that are determined to be necessary to access and maintain utility systems and structures. 6. Non-potable irrigation water lines 6" or larger, including the water meter and backflow devices. For potable and reclaimed water distribution systems that will not be conveyed to the County, a master meter shall be required. Such systems shall be owned and maintained by the applicant, his successor or assigns, from the customer side of the master meter and backflow device or the check valve at the property line or County Utility Easement limit. School and park developments are included in the list of types of developments whose internal systems the applicant or assigns shall be responsible to own and maintain. H. Private lift stations shall conform to the same specifications that apply to public lift stations, unless a Deviation from the Ordinance has been granted in advance and writing by the County Wastewater. The lift station Control Package shall include an operable Telemetry Control System, as specified by County Standards. I. The developer will pay all impact fees in accordance with the latest revision of the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, Code of Laws Section 74.303(d). J. PUD's and DRI's shall have only one master pump station. K. Lift station easement areas shall be designed to 30 feet by 30 feet, or twice the wetwell depth by twice the wetwell depth, whichever is larger. L. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, Code of Laws Chapter 118, solid waste disposal shall be required in the form of bulk containers service (garbage dumpsters and/or compactors) for all commercial and industrial establishments, unless authorization for alternative means of disposal is approved by the Public Utilities Division. Bulk container service shall be required to all multi-family projects not receiving curbside pickup. Solid waste disposal shall be required in the form of curbside pickup for all units on the annual Mandatory Trash Collection and Disposal Special Assessment Roll's. All individual units within a deed-restricted area must have an enclosed location other than the residential structure, such as a carport or garage for the storage of individual solid waste containers, or as otherwise permitted in Section 5.03.04 of the LDC. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-4 3.B.b Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) M. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, Code of Laws Chapter 118, all provisions and facilities for solid waste collection and disposal shall conform to all portions of Section 5.03.04 (Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) of the latest edition of the LDC. 5.8 TRAFFIC The development of this RPUD Master Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. All traffic control devices, signs, pavement markings and design criteria shall be in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards (MUMS), current edition, FDOT Design Standards, current edition, and the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), current edition. All other improvements shall be consistent with and as required by the Collier county Land Development code (LDC). B. Arterial level street lighting shall be provided at all access points. Access lighting must be in place prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (CO). C. Site-related improvements necessary for safe ingress and egress to this project, as determined by Collier County, shall not be eligible for impact fee credits. All required improvements shall be in place and available to the public prior to the issuance of the first CO. D. Road impact fees shall be paid in accordance with Collier County Ordinance 01- 13, as amended, Code of Laws Chapter 74 and Chapter 6 and Chapter 10 of the LDC, as it may be amended. E. All work within Collier County rights-of-way or public easements shall require a Right-of-way Permit. F. All proposed median opening locations shall be in accordance with the Collier County Access Management Policy (Resolution 01-247), as it may be amended, and the LDC, as it may be amended. Collier County reserves the right to modify or close any median opening existing at the time of approval of this RPUD which is found to be adverse to the health, safety and welfare of the public. Any such modifications shall be based on, but are not limited to, safety, operational circulation, and roadway capacity. G. Nothing in any development order shall vest a right of access in excess of a right in/right out condition at any access point. Neither will the existence of a point of ingress, a point of egress or a median opening, nor the lack thereof, shall be the basis for any future cause of action for damages against the County by the developer, its successor in title, or assignee. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-5 3.B.b Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) H. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks and interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer and Collier Country shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. I. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of existing County right- of-way or easement, compensating right-of-way, shall be provided without cost to Collier County as a consequence of such improvement. J. If, in the sole opinion of Collier County, a traffic signal, or other traffic control device, sign or pavement marking improvement within a public right-of-way or easement is determined to be necessary, the cost of such improvement shall be borne by the developer and shall be paid to Collier County before the issuance of the first CO. K. Upon written request by Collier County the property owner shall dedicate, to Collier County without compensation, an area of approximately 721± square feet for road right-of-way purposes, as depicted on the RPUD Conceptual Master Plan. L. A temporary construction access for all site work and vertical construction on Tract B shall be located along Santa Barbara Boulevard, as shown on the PUD Master Plan and subject to issuance of the appropriate right-of-way permit. Temporary construction access shall be limited to one year from issuance of development permit (PPL or SDP). To limit the access to construction activities only, signage is required to indicate Construction Only, and barricades are required to block access during non-working hours. Prior to final approval by the County, the temporary access shall be totally removed, and right-of-way shall be restored. 5.9 PLANNING Pursuant to Chapter 2 of the LDC, if during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted. 5.10 ENVIRONMENTAL A. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic-free) plan for the site, shall be submitted to Environmental Services Staff for review and approval prior to Final Site Development Plan/Construction Plan approval for all parcels included on that project. All category 1 invasive exotic plants as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Council shall be removed in Preserve areas, and annual removal (in perpetuity) shall be the responsibility of the property owner. A.B. A minimum of (3.0 acres) of the on-site native vegetation shall be retained or revegetated, consistent with Chapter 3 of the LDC as conceptually shown as preserve areas on the Exhibit "A", Conceptual RPUD Master Plan. C. Setbacks from preserves shall be as required in the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD, Table I. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-6 3.B.b Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) D. All preserve areas shall be designated as conservation/preservation tracts or easements on all construction plans and shall be so dedicated on all plats or recorded as an easement for site plans pursuant to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes, for plats and be dedicated to the project's homeowners' association or like entity for ownership and maintenance responsibility, and to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance. All documentation necessary to record conservation easements over the preserve areas shall be provided prior to the next SDP approval for this RPUD. E. This RPUD shall comply with the guidelines of the USFWS and FFWCC for impacts to protected species. A habitat management plan for those species shall be submitted to environmental review staff for review and approval prior to site plan approval. F. This RPUD shall be in compliance with the Growth Management Plan, and LDC, except as may be modified herein, at the time of final development order approval. G. A Preserve Management Plan shall be provided to environmental staff for approval prior to site/construction plan approval identifying methods to address treatment of invasive exotic species, fire management and maintenance. A SFWMD jurisdictional determination shall be shown on the site development plan. H. All approved agency permits shall be submitted prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. I. A replanting plan for the re-created preserve areas shall be provided at the time of next development order submittal. Perimeter berms shall be located outside of all upland/wetland preserves. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-7 3.B.b Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 5.11 HOUSING A. The developer or successors and assigns shall pay the sum of $1,000.00 to Collier County from the closing of each of the dwelling units constructed within Tract "B" of the RPUD. The payment shall be made within seven (7) days of the closing of the residential unit. AB. The developer or successors and assigns shall require a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the dwelling units developed within Tract B of the RPUD to be initially sold to individuals or families that use the dwelling unit as their primary residence. The deed to the initial purchaser shall include a restriction that the initial purchaser shall use the unit as their primary residence. C. The developer or successors and assigns agrees to make available for sale a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the dwelling units at a sales price less than $240,000.00. BD. The developer or successors and assigns agrees to sell a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the total number of dwelling units constructed within Tract B of the RPUD to persons employed in Collier County and earning a family income ranging between 100% and 125 that is up to 140% of the County's median income. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-8 3.B.b Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Attachment A - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Strike Underline (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 41.6± Acres Located in Section 04, Township 50 S, Range 26 E Collier County, Florida PREPARED FOR: Santa Barbara Garden Villas, LLC 1401 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 401 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 And St. George Group, Corporation 6303 Blue Lagoon Drive Suite 390 Miami, FL 33126 PREPARED BY: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 And D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates 3800 Via del Rey Bonita Springs, Fl 34134 Insubstantial Change for St. George Group, Corp by: Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 DATE FILED DATE APPROVED BY CPCC DATE APPROVED BY BCC 10-11-2005 ORDINANCE NUMBER 2005-53 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE: ___________ EXHIBIT "A" 3.B.c Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLE i STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE ii SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION I-1 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS II-1 SECTION III RESIDENTIAL "R" DEVELOPMENT AREA III-1 SECTION IV PRESERVE "P" AREA IV-1 SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS V-1 3.B.c Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES EXHIBIT A CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT B SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBIT C LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT D BOUNDARY SURVEY TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS III-3 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean i  3.B.c Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE This Residential Planned Unit Development is on approximately 41.6± acres of land located in Section 04, Township 50 S, Range 26 E, Collier County, Florida. Approximately 6.3 acres of the property is encumbered with a 100' wide roadway easement for Santa Barbara Boulevard, making the net site approximately 35.3 acres. The name of the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) shall be Santa Barbara Landings RPUD. The development of the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as established in the Growth Management Plan. The development will be consistent with the policies of the land development regulations adopted under the Growth Management Plan and applicable regulations for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is located within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Sub-District, as identified on the Future Land Use Map. 2. The density provided for in the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD complies with the Density Rating System contained in the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. The subject property is located within the residential density band, which extends from the Mixed-use activity center located at the intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Davis Boulevard. The density permissible is 4 dwelling units per acre. Up to 3 dwelling units per acre may be added within the density band, bringing the permissible base density to 7 dwelling units per acre. Base density Density band Maximum permitted density Requested density 4.0 du/acre + 3.0du/acre = 7.0 du/acre 7.0 du/acre (291 units) At the time of the rezoning application, 248 multiple-family dwellings exist on the site. The subject rezoning will add a maximum of 43 additional dwelling units for a maximum total of 291 dwelling units. All property within the RPUD boundary shall be utilized in calculating the project density. 3. The project development is compatible and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). 4. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with the applicable land development regulations as required in Objective 3 of the FLUE, except as may be modified in this RPUD document 5. All final local development orders for this project are subject to the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance as required in Objective 2 of the FLUE. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean ii 3.B.c Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 6. The design of Santa Barbara Landings RPUD protects the function of the existing drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as required in Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element. 7. This project shall be subject to applicable Sections of the LDC at the time of development order approval, except as otherwise provided herein. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean iii 3.B.c Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE Section I sets forth the location and ownership of the property, and describes the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name Santa Barbara Landings RPUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property being 41.6 acres more or less, is described as: The west half (W. ½) of the west half (W. ½) of the northwest quarter (N.W. ¼) of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, all being situated in Collier County, Florida, less the north 50 feet thereof. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The property is currently owned by: TRACT A: unit owners of the Santa Barbara Landings Property Owner’s Association Inc. and Granada Lakes Villas Condominium Association Inc., whose address is 145 Santa Clara Drive, Naples, FL 34104, and TRACT B: St. George Group, Corp, whose address is: 6303 Blue Lagoon Drive Suite 390, Miami, FL 33126 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A. The project is located in Section 04, Township 50, Range 26 and is generally bordered on the north by Radio Road, on the east by Plantation PUD; on the south by Bembridge PUD on the west by Santa Barbara Boulevard. B. The zoning classification of the subject property at the time of RPUD application is RMF-6. C. According to FEMA/FIRM Map Panel Number 120067 415 D, dated June 3, 1986, the property is located within Zone X. D. Soils on the site generally include Hallandale fine sand and Boca, Rivera, Limestone Substratum and Copeland fine sand depressional. E. Existing vegetation on the site consists of melaleuca, Brazilian Pepper, palmetto prairie, pine flatwoood, cypress, Cabbage Palm and disturbed lands. Wetland areas have been heavily impacted by melaleuca. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean I-1 3.B.c Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) F. According to the Collier County Drainage Atlas, the site is located in the Lely Canal Basin. The conceptual water management plan is depicted in the Surface Water Management Report, which accompanied the rezone application submittal. 1.5 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance is known and cited as the "Santa Barbara Landings Residential Planned Unit Development Ordinance." 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean I-2 3.B.c Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PURPOSE Section II delineates and generally describes the plan of development and identifies relationships to applicable County ordinances, policies, and procedures. 2.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT A. Santa Barbara Landings RPUD is a mixed-use residential project and will consist of two development parcels and multiple preservation areas. Categories of land uses include those for residential and preserve areas. The Residential areas are designed to accommodate single-family attached, duplex and multiple family dwellings. The overall project density is 7 dwelling units per acre and the maximum units permitted in the RPUD shall be 291 units. B. Exhibit "A" depicts the RPUD Master Plan. The RPUD Master Plan includes a table that summarizes land use acreage. The location, size and configuration of individual tracts shall be determined at the time of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plat approval. 2.3 COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY ORDINANCES A. Regulations for development of Santa Barbara Landings RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate which authorize the construction of improvements. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards then the provisions of the most similar district in the Land Development Code shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. C. Unless modified, waived or excepted from this RPUD Document or associated exhibits, the provisions of other sections of the land development codes, where applicable, remain in full force and effect with respect to the development of the land that comprises this RPUD. D. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Chapter 6, Adequate Public Facilities, of the Land Development Code. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean II- 1 3.B.c Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2.4 LAND USES Land uses are generally depicted on the RPUD Master Plan, Exhibit A. The specific location and size of individual tracts and the assignment of square footage or units shall be determined by the developer at the time of site development plan approval, preliminary subdivision plat approval, or final subdivision plat approval subject to the provisions of Chapter 10 of the Collier County LDC. 2.5 USE OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY The Developer may utilize land within the rights-of-way within the RPUD for landscaping, decorative entranceways, and unified signage. This utilization is subject to review and administrative approval during the development review process by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator for engineering and safety considerations. 2.6 MODEL HOMES SALES OFFICE AND CONSTRUCTION OFFICE A. Construction offices and other uses and structures related to the promotion and sale of real estate such as, but not limited to, pavilions, parking areas, and signs, shall be permitted principal uses throughout the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD. These uses shall be subject to the requirements of Chapter 5 and Chapter IO of the LDC. B. Model Homes may be permitted in multi-family and townhome buildings may be utilized for wet or dry models, subject to the time frames specified in Chapter 5 of the LDC. 2.7 CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO RPUD DOCUMENT OR RPUD MASTER PLAN Changes and amendments may be made to this RPUD Ordinance or RPUD Master Plan as provided in Chapter 10 of the LDC. Minor changes and refinements as described herein may be made by the Developer in connection with any type of development or permit application required by LDC. 2.8 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS A minimum of 30% of the project (12.48± acres) shall be devoted to usable open space. 2.9 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS A minimum of three (3) acres of native vegetation shall be maintained on the subject site through a combination of preservation of existing native vegetation and revegetation of native vegetation. The areas of retained native vegetation and replanted native vegetation are shown as Preserve areas on the Conceptual Master Plan, Exhibit A. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean II-2 3.B.c Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2.10 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE One or more Property Owner's Association (POA) will provide common area maintenance. The POA, as applicable, shall be responsible for the operation, maintenance, and management of the surface water and stormwater management systems and preserves serving Santa Barbara Landings RPUD, in accordance with any applicable permits from the South Florida Water Management District. 2.11 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS A. The Collier County Planned Unit Development District is intended to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership as set forth in Chapter 2 of the LDC. I. Individual Projects a) Site Planning: Each distinct project within the RPUD will provide an aesthetically appealing, identifiable path of entry for pedestrians and vehicles. The orientation of buildings and structures will be sensitive to adjacent land uses and the surrounding community. b) Landscaping: Where applicable, plantings along public rights-of way will be complimentary to streetscape landscaping. 2.12 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERMS, FENCES AND WALLS A. Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls are generally permitted as a principal use throughout the RPUD, excluding preserves. B. The maximum fence, wall or berm height internal to the RPUD shall be eight (8) feet, not including those portions of walls incorporated into project identification signs. The maximum fence height shall be measured relative to the greater of the crown of the adjacent roadway or the adjacent minimum finished floor, as applicable. The eight (8') foot high precast wall shown on the conceptual master plan shall be constructed along the eastern boundary of Tract B concurrent with development of the residential units in tract B. C. Perimeter Buffers abutting rights-of-way shall be permitted to deviate from the required 20' wide Type D buffer, to permit a Type D buffer an average of 20' in width, with no part of the buffer being less than 15' in width. The minimum area for the combined buffers along Radio Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard shall be 66,129 square feet (1.52± acres). 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean II-3 3.B.c Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2.13 SIGNAGE A. GENERAL Signage shall be consistent with Section 5.06 of the LDC. 2.14 SUBSTITUTIONS TO SUBDIVISION DESIGN STANDARDS / DEVIATIONS 1. The Developer reserves the right to request substitutions to subdivision improvement and utility design standards in accordance with Chapter 10 of the LDC. A. Chapter 6, Sidewalks, bike lanes and bike paths 1. Existing site constraints prohibit retrofitting of the site with sidewalks meeting standards in Chapter 6 of the LDC. 2. A six (6) foot wide sidewalk shall be provided on only one (1) side of the internal local or private roadway exceeding one thousand (1,000) feet in length serving the project's additional 43 unit component. 3. The developer of Tract B shall construct a sidewalk interconnection concurrently with the road interconnection from Tract B to Tract A. The developer of Tract B shall coordinate with the School District of Collier County to construct a sidewalk interconnection from Tract B to the adjacent school property at time of Tract B development permitting. 4. The developer shall make payment-in-lieu of construction of the sidewalk within Santa Barbara Boulevard, due to its programmed improvement in the five-year work program. B. Section 4.06.00, Landscaping, buffering and vegetation retention 1. Perimeter Buffers abutting rights-of-way shall be permitted to deviate from the required 20' wide Type D buffer, to permit a Type D buffer an average of 20' in width, with no part of the buffer being less than 15' in width. The minimum area for the combined buffers along Radio Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard shall be 66,129 square feet (1.52± acres). C. Construction Standards Manual, Streets and access improvements 1. Construction Standards Manual, Street Right-of-Way Width Street right-of-way width: The minimum right-of-way width to be utilized for local streets and cul-de-sacs shall be forty (40) feet. Drive aisles serving multi-family tracts shall not be required to meet this standard. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean II-4 3.B.c Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2. Construction Standards Manual, Dead-end Streets Cul-de-sacs may exceed a length of one thousand (1,000) feet. 3. Construction Standards Manual, Intersection Radii Intersection radii: Street intersections shall be provided with a minimum of a twenty five (25) foot radius (face of curb) for all internal project streets and a thirty-five (35) foot radius for intersections at project entrances. 2.15 GENERAL PERMITTED USES A. Certain uses shall be considered general permitted uses throughout the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD except in the Preserve Areas. General permitted uses are those uses that generally serve the entire RPUD or distinct projects there within. B. General Permitted Uses: 1. Essential services as set forth under Chapter 2 of the LDC. 2. Water management facilities and related structures. 3. Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or other architectural or structural bank treatments. 4. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures. 5. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the Developer and Developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses. 6. Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.12 of this document. 7. Signage. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean II-5 3.B.c Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SECTION III RESIDENTIAL "R" DEVELOPMENT AREAS 3.1 PURPOSE Section III establishes permitted uses and development regulations for areas within the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD that are designated Residential "R" on the RPUD Master Plan. 3.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION A. Areas designated as "R" on the RPUD Master Plan are designed to accommodate multiple family residential types, recreational uses, essential services, and customary accessory uses. Acreage is based on a conceptual design. Actual acreage of the development and preserve areas shall be established at the time of Site Development Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance with the Collier County Land Development Code. Areas designated as "R" accommodate internal roadways, open space, parks and amenity areas, lakes and water management facilities, and other similar facilities that are accessory or customary to residential development. B. Areas designated as "R" are intended to provide a maximum of 291 dwelling units. 3.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES A. Principal Uses and Structures 1. Single-family attached and detached. 2. Duplex and two-family. 3. Multiple-family. 4. Townhomes B. Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Common indoor and outdoor recreational facilities. 2. Sales and leasing facilities. 3. Clubhouse, meeting rooms. 4. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted in this area. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean III-1 3.B.c Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Table I sets forth the development standards for land uses within the "R" Residential District. B. Required Parking: Parking within the residential area shall be provided based on the following standards: 1. Recreation Facilities - 2 per court, 1 per 600 square feet of building area, 1 per 200 square feet of pool water area. No additional parking shall be required for outdoor playground facilities. Up to 10 parking spaces per recreational facility may be directly loaded off a private roadway serving the recreational area. 2. Temporary Model Sales Facility - minimum 6 parking spaces per building. Parking for models or temporary sales facilities shall be permitted to back directly onto private roadways serving the units. C. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein or within the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD, shall be in accordance with the Land Development Code in effect at the time of Site Development Plan approval. Unless otherwise indicated, required yards, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. D. Development standards for uses not specifically set forth in Table I shall be established during the Site Development Plan Approval as set forth in Chapter 4 of the Land Development Code in accordance with those standards of the zoning district which is most similar to the proposed use. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean III-2 3.B.c Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) TABLE I SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR "R" RESIDENTIAL AREAS Permitted Uses and Standards Single Family Detached Zero Lot Line Duplex, Single Family Attached and Townhouse5 Multi-Family Dwellings 5 Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF NA NA Minimum Lot Width 50' 40' NA NA Minimum Lot Depth 100' 100' NA NA Front Yard Setback1 20'/23' 20'/23 20'/23' 20'/23' Side Yard Setback 6' 0' or 6' 0' or6' 15' Rear Yard Setback2 15' 15' 15' 15' Santa Barbara Blvd. R-O-W Setback 20' 20' 20' 20' Rear Yard Accessory Setback2 10' 10' 10' 10' Preserve Setback3 Accessory Principal 10' 25' 10' 25' 10' 25' 10' 25' Maximum Zoned Building Height 2 Stories or 30' 2 Stories or 30' 2 Stories or 30' 2 Stories or 30' Distance Between4 Detached Principal Structures 12' 12' 12' 15' Floor Area Min. (SF) 750 SF 750 SF 750 SF 750 SF All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 Front yards shall be measured as follows: A. If the parcel is served by a public right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. B. If the parcel is served by a private road or access easement, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). For multiple family buildings served by an unplatted driveway, no setback shall be required; however, adequate stacking shall be provided to accommodate vehicular parking. For tract B, front entry garage setback shall be a minimum of 23' from private row or back edge of sidewalk. C. For structures with side or rear entry garages, the minimum front yard may be reduced to 12'. 2Rear yards for principal and accessory structures on lots and tracts which abut lake, or open space (non-preserve) may be reduced to O' feet; however, a reduced building setback shall not reduce the width of any required landscape buffer, as may be applicable. 3 For purposes of this Section, accessory structures shall include but not be limited to attached screen enclosures and roofed lanais. 4 A minimum building separation of twelve (12) feet between detached structures. Detached garages may be separated by a minimum of ten (10) feet. 5Attached single-family and multi-family structures within Tract B shall not exceed 4 dwelling units per structure. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean III-3 3.B.c Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SECTION IV PRESERVE "P" AREAS 4.1 PURPOSE Section IV establishes permitted uses and development regulations for areas within Santa Barbara Landings RPUD that are designated as Preserve "P" on the RPUD Master Plan. 4.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as "P" on the RPUD Master Plan are designed to accommodate natural systems existing or created as preserves and limited water management uses and functions. 4.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES A. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, subject to review and approval by local, state & federal agencies as required, for other than the following: B. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1. Boardwalks and nature trails (excluding impervious paved trails). 2. Water management facilities. 3. Any other preserve and related use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals determines to be compatible in the Preserve Area. 4.4 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS A. Building setbacks shall be 20 feet from the RPUD boundary for any permitted structure. B. Maximum zoned height for any structure shall be 20'. 4.5 PRESERVE AREA ADJUSTMENTS The proposed preserve areas depicted on the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Master Plan are intended to meet the native vegetation requirements of the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Collier County LDC. Adjustments may be made to the location of the preservation areas at the time of preliminary plat or site development plan approval based on jurisdictional agency permit requirements. Approximately 6 acres of native vegetation exists on-site at the time of rezoning application. Through retention of existing native vegetation and revegetation of open 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean IV-1 3.B.c Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) spaces on-site, the developer shall provide a minimum of 3 acres of on-site native vegetation, which shall consist of a minimum of 1.5 acres of retained vegetation and 1.5 acres of replanted and enhanced native vegetation. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean IV-2 3.B.c Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the commitments for the development of this project. 5.2 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with Final Site Development Plans, Final Subdivision Plans and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this RPUD, in effect at the time of Final Plat, Final Site Development Plan approval or building permit application as the case may be. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the official County Land Development Code shall apply to this project even if the land within the RPUD is not to be platted. The developer, his successor and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this document. These developer commitments will be enforced through provisions agreed to be included in the declaration of covenants and restrictions or similar recorded instrument. Such provisions must be enforceable by lot owners against the developer, it successors and assigns, regardless of turnover or not to any property or homeowners' association. The developer, his successor or assignee, shall follow the RPUD Master Plan and the regulations of this RPUD as adopted and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor in title or assignee is subject to the commitments within this Agreement. 5.3 RPUD MASTER PLAN A. Exhibit "A", RPUD Master Plan illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed area, lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as Final Platting or Site Development Plan approval. Subject to the provisions of Chapter 10 of the LDC, amendments may be made from time to time. 5.4 PUD MONITORING 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean V-1 3.B.c Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD Insubstantial Change approval dated__________2020, the Managing Entity for Tract B is St. George Group, Corp. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 5.5 ENGINEERING A. This project shall be required to meet all County Ordinances in effect at the time final construction documents are submitted for development approval. B. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with appropriate provisions of the LDC. 5.6 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT In accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), this project shall be designed for a storm event of 3-day duration and 25-year return frequency. A. The project will be permitted with the South Florida Water Management District and copies of the applicable permits will be provided to Collier County prior to issuance of applicable County permits. B. Existing lakes already constructed as of the effective date of this regulation shall be allowed to continue to exist in accordance with the cross sections shown on Surface Water Management Plan, Exhibit "B". Any new lakes must meet the requirements of the then current LDC. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean V-2 3.B.c Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 5.7 UTILITIES A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission and interim water and/or sewage treatment facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time approvals are requested. C. Water and wastewater systems shall be constructed in accordance with State of Florida Laws and Collier County's Codes and Ordinances. D. All construction plans, technical specifications and hydraulic design reports are to be reviewed and approved in writing by the Engineering Services Department of the Community Development and Environmental Services Division prior to commencement of construction E. Upon completion of construction, all water and wastewater systems within the project shall be tested and must meet minimum County standards and requirements. The system(s), or a portion thereof, that is found to meet the requirements set forth in item #5 below, may then be conveyed to the County for ownership and maintenance. F. If County's utility system does not have access readily available to serve a project within the County's service area, extensions to the County infrastructure may be required. All required extensions shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer, fiscally and otherwise (time and schedule), unless such extension has been previously defined in the County Water and/or Wastewater Master Plan. In such case, the developer may negotiate an upsizing agreement with the County. If it is determined by the County that neither of these two options are feasible, in interim system may be considered. G. Items on the following list shall be conveyed to the County for ownership and maintenance upon approval from the Board of County Commissioners if they are located within a County right-of-way or County Utility Easement (CUE), are in compliance with the latest revision of the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance, and are connected to the County Water, Wastewater or Reclaimed Systems: 1. Potable water lines 6" or larger, including water meters and backflow devices that are not on fire lines. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean V-3 3.B.c Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2. Gravity wastewater lines 8" or larger. 3. Wastewater lift stations that are located within a CUE. 4. Force mains 4" or larger. 5. CUE's that are determined to be necessary to access and maintain utility systems and structures. 6. Non-potable irrigation water lines 6" or larger, including the water meter and backflow devices. For potable and reclaimed water distribution systems that will not be conveyed to the County, a master meter shall be required. Such systems shall be owned and maintained by the applicant, his successor or assigns, from the customer side of the master meter and backflow device or the check valve at the property line or County Utility Easement limit. School and park developments are included in the list of types of developments whose internal systems the applicant or assigns shall be responsible to own and maintain. H. Private lift stations shall conform to the same specifications that apply to public lift stations, unless a Deviation from the Ordinance has been granted in advance and writing by the County Wastewater. The lift station Control Package shall include an operable Telemetry Control System, as specified by County Standards. I. The developer will pay all impact fees in accordance with the latest revision of the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, Code of Laws Section 74.303(d). J. PUD's and DRI's shall have only one master pump station. K. Lift station easement areas shall be designed to 30 feet by 30 feet, or twice the wetwell depth by twice the wetwell depth, whichever is larger. L. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, Code of Laws Chapter 118, solid waste disposal shall be required in the form of bulk containers service (garbage dumpsters and/or compactors) for all commercial and industrial establishments, unless authorization for alternative means of disposal is approved by the Public Utilities Division. Bulk container service shall be required to all multi-family projects not receiving curbside pickup. Solid waste disposal shall be required in the form of curbside pickup for all units on the annual Mandatory Trash Collection and Disposal Special Assessment Roll's. All individual units within a deed-restricted area must have an enclosed location other than the residential structure, such as a carport or garage for the storage of individual solid waste containers, or as otherwise permitted in Section 5.03.04 of the LDC. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean V-4 3.B.c Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) M. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, Code of Laws Chapter 118, all provisions and facilities for solid waste collection and disposal shall conform to all portions of Section 5.03.04 (Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) of the latest edition of the LDC. 5.8 TRAFFIC The development of this RPUD Master Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. All traffic control devices, signs, pavement markings and design criteria shall be in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards (MUMS), current edition, FDOT Design Standards, current edition, and the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), current edition. All other improvements shall be consistent with and as required by the Collier county Land Development code (LDC). B. Arterial level street lighting shall be provided at all access points. Access lighting must be in place prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (CO). C. Site-related improvements necessary for safe ingress and egress to this project, as determined by Collier County, shall not be eligible for impact fee credits. All required improvements shall be in place and available to the public prior to the issuance of the first CO. D. Road impact fees shall be paid in accordance with Collier County Ordinance 01- 13, as amended, Code of Laws Chapter 74 and Chapter 6 and Chapter 10 of the LDC, as it may be amended. E. All work within Collier County rights-of-way or public easements shall require a Right-of-way Permit. F. All proposed median opening locations shall be in accordance with the Collier County Access Management Policy (Resolution 01-247), as it may be amended, and the LDC, as it may be amended. Collier County reserves the right to modify or close any median opening existing at the time of approval of this RPUD which is found to be adverse to the health, safety and welfare of the public. Any such modifications shall be based on, but are not limited to, safety, operational circulation, and roadway capacity. G. Nothing in any development order shall vest a right of access in excess of a right in/right out condition at any access point. Neither will the existence of a point of ingress, a point of egress or a median opening, nor the lack thereof, shall be the basis for any future cause of action for damages against the County by the developer, its successor in title, or assignee. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean V-5 3.B.c Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) H. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks and interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer and Collier Country shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. I. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of existing County right- of-way or easement, compensating right-of-way, shall be provided without cost to Collier County as a consequence of such improvement. J. If, in the sole opinion of Collier County, a traffic signal, or other traffic control device, sign or pavement marking improvement within a public right-of-way or easement is determined to be necessary, the cost of such improvement shall be borne by the developer and shall be paid to Collier County before the issuance of the first CO. K. Upon written request by Collier County the property owner shall dedicate, to Collier County without compensation, an area of approximately 721± square feet for road right-of-way purposes, as depicted on the RPUD Conceptual Master Plan. L. A temporary construction access for all site work and vertical construction on Tract B shall be located along Santa Barbara Boulevard, as shown on the PUD Master Plan and subject to issuance of the appropriate right-of-way permit. Temporary construction access shall be limited to one year from issuance of development permit (PPL or SDP). To limit the access to construction activities only, signage is required to indicate Construction Only, and barricades are required to block access during non-working hours. Prior to final approval by the County, the temporary access shall be totally removed, and right-of-way shall be restored. 5.9 PLANNING Pursuant to Chapter 2 of the LDC, if during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted. 5.10 ENVIRONMENTAL A. A minimum of (3.0 acres) of the on-site native vegetation shall be retained or revegetated, consistent with Chapter 3 of the LDC as conceptually shown as preserve areas on the Exhibit "A", Conceptual RPUD Master Plan. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean V-6 3.B.c Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 5.11 HOUSING A. The developer or successors and assigns shall require a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the dwelling units developed within Tract B of the RPUD to be initially sold to individuals or families that use the dwelling unit as their primary residence. The deed to the initial purchaser shall include a restriction that the initial purchaser shall use the unit as their primary residence. B. The developer or successors and assigns agrees to sell a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the total number of dwelling units constructed within Tract B of the RPUD to persons employed in Collier County and earning a family income that is up to 140% of the County's median income. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Clean V-8 3.B.c Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Attachment B - Santa Barbara Landings PUD Document - Clean version (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE 2/27/20 8' PRE CAST WALL (TRACT B)SANTA CLARA DRIVEROAD & SIDEWALK INTERCONNECTIONROAD & SIDEWALK INTERCONNECTIONINSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE 5/6/20Calusa Park School sidewalk interconnectionTEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS WITH RIGHT TURN LANETract B connection to School and construction access labelsSIDEWALK INTERCONNECTION - Final design to be coordinated with School District and Calusa Park Elementary AVERAGE AVERAGEERAGAVERAGEVERAG20' 0'0(i(min. (i15') TYPETYDINSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE 9/23/20Correction to buffer label per PUD3.B.dPacket Pg. 99Attachment: Attachment C - Master Plan Revisions - Santa Barbara Landings (13383 : PL20190000959 Tract B connection to School and construction access labelsINSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE 2/27/208' PRE CAST WALL (TRACT B) SANTA CLARA DRIVETEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS WITH RIGHT TURN LANEROAD & SIDEWALK INTERCONNECTIONROAD & SIDEWALK INTERCONNECTIONSIDEWALK INTERCONNECTION - Final design to be coordinated with School District and Calusa Park Elementary INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE 5/6/20Calusa Park School sidewalk interconnectionAVERAGE AVERAGEAVERAGAVERAVERA20' 0'''((ii(min. 15')5'TTYPEDINSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE 9/23/20Correction to buffer label per PUD3.B.dPacket Pg. 100Attachment: Attachment C - Master Plan Revisions - Santa Barbara Landings (13383 : PL20190000959 ‒ 1 ‒ PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings Residential PUD Growth Management Department Zoning Division C O N S I S T E N C Y R E V I E W M E M O R A N D U M To: Laura DeJohn, AICP, Principal Planner, VEN, Zoning Services Section Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: July 23, 2020 Subject: Future Land Use Element Consistency Review of Proposed Insubstantial Change (PDI) of a Planned Unit Development PETITION NUMBER: PL20190000959 [REV: 4] PETITION NAME: Santa Barbara Landings Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) PDI REQUEST: This petition requests an Insubstantial Change (PDI) to the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD to allow a number of minor changes to the PUD, including those pertaining to wall construction along the eastern boundary of the PUD, to sidewalk connection between [now, separately-owned] tracts A & B, to certain housing commitments, a temporary construction entrance from Santa Barbara, and so forth. Submittal 3 included several citizen letters concerning this project. Submittal 4 revised Section 5.10 of the PUD by removing most sections under 5.10 Environmental. LOCATION: The subject site, consisting of ±41.61 acres, is located on the south side of Radio Road, east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The Future Land Use Map shows the subject site designated as Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict and within the residential density band for Mixed Use Activity Center #6. The subject site is zoned Santa Barbara Landings RPUD. This PDI application proposes no changes to the approved type or number of dwelling units uses, or density. No changes are proposed to the configuration of residential buildings per the approved Master Plan. Since the RPUD was initially approved, the acreage has been partially developed – with the developed portion now in Tract A and the undeveloped portion in Tract B ‒ and now under two separate ownerships. The PDI proposes changes to PUD conditions to apply at the time of permitting for each tract. Select FLUE Policies are given below, followed with [bracketed staff analysis]. FLUE Policy 5.6 “New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended).” [It is the responsibility of the Zoning and Land Development Review staff, as part of their review of the petition in its entirety, to perform the compatibility analysis.] 3.B.e Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Attachment D - FLUE Consistency Review (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) ‒ 2 ‒ PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings Residential PUD Objective 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The Santa Barbara Landings Master Plan depicts a subject property that fronts Radio Road and Santa Barbara Blvd., an arterial and collector road, respectively, per the Transportation Element. The Master Plan depicts connection to Radio Road as its existing main point of entry, and a second connection to Santa Barbara Blvd.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals . [The Santa Barbara Landings Master Plan depicts internal accesses (some on loop drives) to all residential buildings. This includes completing the connection between the developed Tract A and the undeveloped Tract B.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [The existing PUD provides no interconnection with the adjoining parcel to the east (which is fully developed) or to the south (which is the access road to a public school). The insubstantial changes proposed by this PDI do not affect this configuration and staff finds it not feasible to provide such interconnections.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [With respect to how this development responds to the County’s plans in providing a walkable community generally, submittal document, GMP Consistency Narrative, propose sidewalk connections between the 2 tracts of the PUD be maintained, but now, to be constructed concurrent with the roadway connection between the 2 tracts – so the PUD remains consistent with this Smart Growth policy. With respect to the other characteristics covered by this policy, the insubstantial changes proposed do not affect the densities, common open spaces, civic facilities, or range of housing prices and types – and no further review is needed.] CONCLUSION: Based upon the above analysis, this proposed PDI may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager, Zoning Services Section Anita Jenkins, AICP, Community Planning Manager Santa Barbara Landings PDI PL20190000959 R4.docx 3.B.e Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Attachment D - FLUE Consistency Review (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) REZOIIE FINDINGS PETMON PT]DZJI3-AR-4493 Agonda lt6m No. BB Octobor 1 1, 2005 Page 15 of 83 scction 10.03.05 of thc collicr county Land Dwelopmc,nt c,odc rcquires that the rcport and rtcommeadations of the Plaruring Commission to the Board of County C.ouunissioncrs shiU show that ttre Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in rclation to the following, wherc ryplicable: 1. Wbether ttre proposed change will be conelstent wlth the goals, obJectlver & policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elemente of the Growth Management Plan. The subject property is locarcd within the Activity Center # 6 Rcsidential Density Band. The density pemitted within the Santa Barbara Landings PUD is consistcnt with thc FLUE as currelrtly provided in the Growth Managemcnt Plau by Policy 2.5, 6.1, and the Density Rating System. Thereiorc, this petition is Consistcot by Policy. 2. The exisdng land uce pattern; The Property to the north and west is zoned Berkshire Lakes PUD and developed as commercial, aud single-family and multiple-family residential. The property !o the east is zoned Plantation PUD and developed with single-family and multiple-family rcsidcntial. The property to thc south is zoned Bembridge PUD and is developed with a public elernantary school. 3, The posslble creation ofan isolrted dlstrlct rnrelated to adJacent and Derrby dlstrlcts, The Santa Barbara Landings PUD parcel is of suflicient size that it will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby disticts. It is also cotrsistcnt with expected land uses by virtue of its consistency with the FLUE of the GMP. 4, Whether existing dlstrlct bounderles sre lloglcally drawn ln reladon to eristing condltions on the property proposed for change. The Santa Barbara Landings PUD is of sufficient size that it will not result in atr isolated disbict uuelated to adjacest and nearby districts. It is also consistcnt with expccted land uses by virtue of is consistency with the FLUE. EXHIBIT "A' 5, Whetber changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proPosed ametrdment Eecessary. PLIDZ-2003-AR*4493 SANTA BARBATA LANDINGS PIJD ccPc MTG. 3/3i0510 of 15 3.B.f Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Attachment E - Findings of Fact (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) ^'t"t'[?Ti?rB? The subject propcrty is locatcd within the Activity Cerlter #6 Residential Densiff&l0of?Be Density Raing Systcm of thc GMP discrctionsdly provides for a "Density Bonus', for properties within this area if the petition is compatible to the sunounding propertics and meets spccific criteria listed in thc GMP. The subject property meet criteria #2 Proximity to Mixed Usc Activity Center, #4 Residential- hfill, #5 Roadway Access, and #7 Transportation Concurrc,lrcy Managerne,nt Area GCMA). 6, Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood, The proposed change will not adversely influeoce living conditions within the neighboring properties due to the project's consistency with the GMP aod compatibility with neighboring properties. The pmposed dwelling udts will consist of ten four-family dwelling units and one three-family dwelling unit, and be of similar construction and dcsign as the existing buildings on the subject property. The proposed rezone will have no significant impact on any adopted level of service standard, 7, Whether the propmed chauge will create or exccslyely increase trafrlc congecdon or create types of traffic deemed incompatible wlth surroundlng land uses, because of peak volumes or proJected types of vehicular tnftic, including acdvlty durhg construction phases of the dcvclopment or otherwlse affect public safety. Evaluation of this project took into account the requtement for consistency with Policy 5.1 ofthe Transportation Element and Policy 6.1 of the Future Land Use Elsment of the GMP and was found consistent. The proposed change will result in an overall 430 in daily trips within the Santa Barbara Landings PUD. E. Whether the proposed chauge will crerte a dreinage problem. The Land Development Code specifically provides the developmant standards that are desigred to reduce the risk of flooding on nearby properties. New development in and of itself is uot supposed to ilcrease flooding potential on adjacent property over and above what would occur without development. In summary, every project approved in Collier County involving tlre utilization of land for some land use activity is scrutinized and required to mitigate all sub-surface drainage generated by dcvelopmental activities as a condition of approval. This project was reviewed for drainage relatiouships and design and construction plans are required to meet County standards as a condition of approval. 9, Whether the proposed chsEge will seriously reduce llght and alr to edjacetrt arers. All projects in Collier County are subject to the development standards that are unique to the zoning district in which it is located. These developmant standards and others apply generally and equally to all zonrng districts (i.e. open space requiremcnt, corridor management provisions, etc.) were designed to ensurc that light penctration and circulation of air does not adversely affect adjacent areas. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including mning, however zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since valuc dctermination by law is driven by market value. The mere fact that a property is given a new zoning designation or amsndmert may or may not affect value, However, PUDZ-2003-AR-4493 SAI{TA BAIBAILA LANDINGS PlrD l1 of 15 CCPC MTG. 3i3l05 10. Whether tlle proposed change will adversely effect property values in the adjacent area. 3.B.f Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Attachment E - Findings of Fact (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 1l' whetber the proposed change wlll be a deterrcnt to the lmprovemeDt or developmeDt of edjecent property ln accordence wlth exisdng reguletlonr. The undevelopcd pro,pcrties nearby the proposcd PUD should not be affected by the requested ameDdment in that the project provides a landscape buffer, provides an area dedicated for conscrvatior/prcserrzes, and is consistent with the approvcd zoned projects in the area. 12. whether tle propored chuge wlll conrdtute r grant of rpeclsl prMtcge to ao lndlvlduet owler as contrriting with the publlc welfere. Agenda ttom No. gB staff_is of the opinirca that this petition will not adverscly affect property "rlr", b*;"H+r|ig, consistcncy with the Gmwth Management Plan. The proposed rezone to PUD complies with the Gro*th Management Plan, which is a public policy statemerlt supporting zoning actions when they arc consistent with said plans. In light of this fact the proposed PLID does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consisteocy with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare lelationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public intcrcst, t3. whether there are substaDtlsl reeeons why the property cannot be used ln accordance with existing zonlng. The subject propcrty has been dcveloped with 248 multiple-family residential dwelling,,"its within thc regulations of the Residcntial Multiple-family-6 (RMF-6) zoning district. The petition proposes to utilize the "Density Bonus" criteria of the Density Rating System ofthe GMP for al additional 43 residantial dwelling units. 14. Whether the change suggected ls out of scale wlth the needs of the ueigbborhood or tbe County, The proposed PUD is dcsigned in a maaner that is compatible with suuounding and approved rcsidential pmperty in size and scale. It is also consistent with the FLUE of the Growth Management P|an. 15. Wbether ie it imposcible to fnd other rdequ.te slter ln the County for tle propored use in dlsdctr rlready permiftitrg such use, There are many sites which are zoned !o accommodate the proposed devclopment. This is not the determining factor whcn evaluating the appropriateness ofa rezoning decision. The determinants of zoning are consistcncy with all elements of the GMP, compatibility, adequacy of infrastructurc and to some extent the timing of the action and all of the above criteria. 15. The phyrical characterlstlc! of the property and the degree of rlte alteratlon, whlcb would be requlred to make the property uscble for any of the range of potentlal ures under the propoeed, zonlng clasrlf cadon. Preservation reas have been idcntified on the Conceptual Master Plan. Additionally, the owner has agreed to revegetate portions ofthc property to enhance native vegetation PUDA2003-AR-4493 SANTA BARBARA T,^ANDINGS PI]D 12 of l5 ccPc MTG. 3i3l05 3.B.f Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Attachment E - Findings of Fact (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) ^'&tsJ:?Ti?,"!17. The lEprct of development on the avellabillty of edequate publlc factlitieshll ttF,flSs conslstent with the levels of servlce adopted in the Collier county Growt[ Management plan and as deflned and lmplemented through the Colller Coutrty Adequate Public Faclllties Ordinancg as amended. A multi-disciplined team responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP has reviewed this Petition and they have found it consistent with the GMP. The conditions of approval have bcen incorporatcd into the ?UD document. Staff reviews for adequacy of public services and levels of service determined that rcquired infrastucturc mects with GMP established relationships. FINDINGS FOR PUD PUDZo&AR- 4493 Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the Plaming Commission to make a finding as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the following criteria: PUDZ-2003-AR-4493 SA}ITA BAIBAI!{ LANDINGS PI.'D 13 of l5 CCPC MTG. 3/3/05 3.B.f Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Attachment E - Findings of Fact (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) Agenda ftem No. BB l. The suttablllty of &e rrer for the type rnd prttern of devetopment Orrp?:H;l"Ufdil to physical cbarecterlsdcs of t[e lend, rurroundlng erelr, trafflc and accelr, dralnlge, sewer, water, and other utilldes. Jurisdictional rwiews by County stalf supporl the manner and pattc,n of develop,ment proposed for the subject propefty. Development conditions contained in the santa Barbara Landings puD document give assurance that all ir:fastructures will be developed consistent with County rcguldions. Any inadequacies that require supplementing the PUD document will bc rccommended to the Planning Commission and the BCC as conditions of approval by staff. Reconrmended mitigation measurcs will assurc compliance with Level of Service relationships as presctibed by the GMp. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unllied control end suiteblllty of any propoced rgreeEen&, coatract, or other instrum€nts, or for gmendments ln tbore proposed, particularly as they may relrte to arratrgeEents or provfuions to be made for the continuing operatlon end malntenance ofsuch areas and facllities thst are Dot to be provided or malntalned Et public expense, Documents submitted with the Santa Barbara Landings PUD applicatioo providc evideoce of unified control. The PUD docuoent makes appropriatc provisions for continuing operation and maintcnance of common areas. 3. Conformlty of the propoced Planned Unlt Devetopment wlth the goah, obJecdver and pollcler of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The subject petition has becn found consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the GI\4P. The Satrta Bartara Landings PUD proposes an additional 43 rcsidential dwclling units, for a maximum of 291 residential dwclling units that are consisteot with the CMp (See Staffreport). 4. The lnternel and erternal compatlblllty of propored useq whlch condltlonc may include reetrlctions ou location of improvements, restrictlons on deslgn, and buffering end ecreenlng requlrements. The adoptcd PUD, including all the attendant buffering, land use locational criteria, aod other cornPatibility development requircrneots reasonably assure the project wilt be constructed with intemal and external compatibility ad&essed. EXIfIBIT "B" 5, The adequacy of usable open sprce areas ln edstence rnd as proposed to serve the development. As provided in Section IV - Preserve "P" Areas and Subsection 5.10 - Environmental of the PUD Document, the amount of open space set aside by this projcct is consistent with the provisions of the Land Development Code. PUDZ-2003-AR4493 SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PUD 14 of l5 ccPc MTG. 3/3/05 3.B.f Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Attachment E - Findings of Fact (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) e?ill8J5Ti?aB? 6. The timing or soquetroe of development for the purpose of aecuring thehlfd0ntFlf available improvements and facllldes, both publlc and prlvate. The proposed Santa Ba6ara Lan.lings PUD will not adversely impact the timing or sequence of development that is currently allowcd in the area. Furtlermorc, the adopted coocurrency requireruents ensure that further LOS degradation is not allowed or the LOS deficiency is corrected. 7. The abllity of the subject property end of surroundlng arees to accommodate erpension. Ability, as applied in this context, implies supporting inhastruchre such as wastewater disposal systerrl potable water supplies, characteristics of the property rclativc to hazards, and capacity of roads, is supportive of conditions emanating from u$an developmant. 8. Conformity with PUD reguledons, or as to decireble modificetions of such regulafionr in tbe particular case, besed on determinrtion thrt such modlficedons ere jusdfied as mecting publlc purposes to a degree at least equlvelent to literal appllcatlon ofsuch regulations. PIJDZ-2003-AR-4493 SANTA BARBARA LANDINCS PUD 15 of l5 ccPc MTG. 3/3/05 Staff analysis indicates that the Santa Barbara Landings PUD conforms to the Pt-iD regulations. 3.B.f Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Attachment E - Findings of Fact (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) GRANADA LAKES VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. AND SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP Collier County Growth Management 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: PDI-PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Submittal #2 Dear Tim. Thanks for your time today and I have left messages for Ms. Cook and Mr. Brown. After our discussion I went back and rc-read the entire revised Proposcd RPUD document and have several issues and questions and or clarifications needed. Generally, most of the issues dcal with the integration of the existing Tracr A (Granada Lakes Villas Condos) and Tract B (new proposed development) developmenr standards and requirements. We have previously met with Ms. DeJohn rcgarding their proposed changes to the RPUD document, but I have jusr received a copy of the proposed revisions and they do not fully represent our discussions. As you are aware. Granada Lakes Villas is the result ofa condo conversion completcd by Armando Bucelo / St. George, etal in 2005 through 2008 when he originally purchased the Santa Barbara Landings Apanments in 2004/2005. He subsequently sepamted the property into Tracts A and B and applied for a zoning change to RPUD to add the 43 units in Tract B (the original preserves). He then completed the condo conversion of the spartmenB and sold the condo units. However, the recession started and he was not able to complete the development of Tract B. Subscquently. by 2013 he no longer had any interest in either Cranada Lakes Villas Condominium Association or Santa Barbara Landings Property Owners Association. At this point Mr. Bucelo / St. George. etal cannot bind either Association for any changes to Tract A pur$"lant to the dcaclofncnt plans. Further, upon the condo conversion the only rights that Bucelo / St. George pur in the Condominium documents was for access to Tract B through Santa Clara Drive wilhout any other dcvelopmenl commitments. etc. As I understand. the RPUD document ulilizcs the entirc 4l.6acre propeny and consistendy spplies rhc RPUD development standards to the whole site. However, it does not take inlo account that Tract A is existing and the development standards upon which it was built on are not th€ same as rhe currenr srandards and Tract A should not be held to the current standards. This is clearly stated in the Statement of Compliance in paragraph 7. Paragraph 7 should only rcference Tract B. This same comment will apply through out rhe entire PUD document. I am also confused why as owners of Tract A as listed in Section 1.3 why we have not becn involved by the County in this RPUD change. St. George / Armando Bucelo. etal do not have any rights to Tract A and cannot agee to any development standards for Tract A .t.5 SANTA GLARA DR IIIAPLES, FL 34104 (239} 206.2678 March 17. 2020 3.B.g Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Attachment F - March 17, 2020 Letter of Concern with Staff Response (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) within specific sections under the rcvised RPUD document, I have lisred addirional specific commenls. 2.3 compliance - Should reference Tract B only. Tract A remains pursuanr to lhe original SDp. 2.9 Netive vegetrtion - Master Plan shows new Prcserves in Tract A. These preserves were not part ofthe original approval ofthe SDP, which showed rract B as the prescrves. The Associations will not provide any preserves in Tract A. 2.10 Common Arer Meintcnrnce - Sanra Barbara Landings propcrty owners Association onl1, provides for common maintenance within Tract A and rract B should provide their own. Further fie Tracl B stormwater system needs to incorporate Tract A's stormwaier pursuant to the exisling system. 2.12c Lrndscepe Bulfers - This should pertain only to Tract B and rract A is pursuant to rhe existing SDP. 2.14A2&3 Substitutions - How do these 2 comments affect Tract A. Should apply to Tract B only. 2'l4B scction 4.06.fl) - should refcrence Tract B only. Tract A remains pursuant to the original SDP. 2.14C construction strndrrds - Should rcference Tract B only. Tract A remains pursuant to the original SDP. 3.4 Development stsnderds - Should refercnce Tract B only. Tract A remains pursuanr to the original SDP. Trble I Developmenl strndcrds - Should reference Tract B only. Tract A rcmains pursuant to the original SDP. 4,5 Prtcene Arer - Tract A does not have any pres€rves. original spD provided preserves:rs Tract B. Any preserves in Tract A should be eliminated from this provision and the Master plan. Section 5 DevelopmeDt commitments - Should reference Tract B only and does not affect Tract A in its entirety, including any specific commitment which impacts or references anylhing in Tracr A, Further within the scope ofthe transportation issues. we need to have a written agreement with the developer regarding the usage of the entrance road for Tract B access including cost sharing for the road and gate maintenance and any other impacts. one possible impact will be trash issues since Tract A has a dumpster location at the southem culde-sac where the Tract B's esst access will be located. we arc nor interested in the Tracl B residents utilizing our dumpsters and need protections accordingly. As an additional note, Bucelo i St. George installed the entrance gate systcm wilh thc convasion and was wcll aware of is cost and maintcnancc issues whan he completed the RPUD Revision in 2005. Please rcview our comments and we will be happy to meet with the various planners to discuss in further details our concems. Frank Cooper, President Granada Lakes Villas Condominium Association, Inc. Santa Barbara Landings Property Owners Association, Inc. Direct Contact - Tele (239) 250- I 300 Email - FCProperties@comcast.net Heather Keel, CAM, Cambridge Management of SWF[. Laura DeJohn, AICP, Johnson Engineering, Inc. 'V 3.B.g Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Attachment F - March 17, 2020 Letter of Concern with Staff Response (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) STAFF RESPONSE: March 17,202O - Letter of Concern Staffhad corresponded with the president ofthe Granada Lakes Village Condominium Association/Santa Barbara Landings Property Owners Association with issues conceming this petition pertaining to Tract A The following points are listed below from this letter with staffs response: Point 1 "2.3 Compliance - Should reference Tract B only. Tract A remoins pursuant to the original SDP." Statf Response: There are no proposed changes to this section ofthe PUD through this petition. Point 2 "2.9 Native Vegelation - Master Plan shows new Preserves in Tract A. These preserves were not part of the original approval of the SDP, which showed Tract B as the preseryes. The Associatiow will not provide any preserves in Tract A. " StaffResponse: The Santa Barbara Landings PUD, which was codified under Ordinance 05-53, identified two preserve locations within Tract A and two preserves within Tract B. The approved Master Plan identified the preserves in Tract A as recreated preserves. In order for development in Tract B to occur, the preserves must meet the standards set forth in LDC section 3.05.07, including the created preserve standards for the preserves in Tract A. Additionally, these areas will have to be put into preservation and dedicated to Collier County through a Conservation Easement or plat. No changes to the preserve locations or acreages was requested through this PDI apptication. Changes to the locations ofthe preserves must be done through a PUD Amendment. Point 3 "2.10 Common Area Mainlenance - Santa Barbara Landings Property Owners Association only provides for common maintenance within Tract A and Tract B should provide their own. Further the Tract B stormwdter system needs to incorporate Tract A's stormwater pursuant to the existing system. " Slaff Response: The stormwater design for Track A and B are linked together and share an outfall into the Santa Barbara Boulevard roadside swale from an existing control structure located in track B. The site development stormwater design for Track B will have to include intemal and extemal routing flows, easements and other existing design criteria from Track A; pursuant to the existing shared stormwater system. Point 4 "2.12c Landscape Bufferc - This should pertain only to Tract B and rract A is pursuant to the existing SDP. " Staff Response: Section 2.12 C was included in the original PUD and is not proposed to be changed as part ofthis PUDA. Point 5 "2-14A2&3 substitations - How do these 2 comments affect Tract A. should apply to Tract B 3.B.g Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Attachment F - March 17, 2020 Letter of Concern with Staff Response (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) only. " StaffResponse: The only change proposed is to require a sidewalk connection between Tract A and Track B; and provide a sidewalk connection from Tract B to the adjacent elementary school to the south as requested by the Collier County School Board. Point 6 "2.148 Section 4,06.00 - Should reference Tract B only. Tract A remains pursuant to the original SDP.'' Staff Response: Section 2.14 B was included in the original PUD and is not proposed to be changed as part of this PUDA. Staff Response: No, there are no proposed changes to this section of the PUD Point 8 "j.4 Developmenl Standards - Should reference Tract B only. Tract A remains pursuant to the original SDP. " Staff Response: There are no proposed changes to this section ofthe PUD through this petition. Point 9 "Table I Developmenl Slandards - Should reference Tract B only. Tract A remains pursuant to the original SDP. " Staff Response: There are no proposed changes to this section of the PUD through this petition. Point l0 "4-5 Preseme Area - Tract A does not have any preserves. Original SPD provided preserves as Tract B. Any preserves in Tract A should be eliminated from this provision and the Master Plan." Staff Response: The Santa Barbara Landings PUD, which was codified under Ordinance 05-53, identified two preserve locations within Tract A and two preserves within Tract B. The approved Master Plan identified the preserves in Tract A as recreated preserves. In order for development in Tract B to occur, the preserves must meet the standards set forth in LDC section 3.05.07, including the created preserve standards for the preserves in Tract A. Additionally, these areas will have to be put into preservation and dedicated to Collier County through a Conservation Easement or plat. No changes to the preserve locations or acreages was requested through this PDI application. Changes to the locations of the preserves must be done through a PUD Amendment. Point 1l "section 5 Development commitments - should reference Tract B only and does not affect Tract Point 7 "2.14C Construction Slandards - Should reference Tract B only. Tract A remains pursuant to the original SDP. " 3.B.g Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Attachment F - March 17, 2020 Letter of Concern with Staff Response (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) A in its entirety, including any specific commitment which impacts or references anything in Tract A." Staff Response: The proposed changes to the PUD are limited to Tract B. Point 12 "Further within the scope of the transportation issues, we need to have a written agreement with the detteloper regarding the usage ofthe entrance road for Tract B access including cost sharingfor the road and gate maintenance and any other impacts. One possible impact will be trash issues since Tract A has a dumpster location at the southern cul-de-sac where the Tract B's east access will be located. We are not interested in the Tract B restdents utilizing our dumpsters and need protections accordingly. As an additional note, Bucelo / St. George installed the entrance gdte system with the conversion and was well aware of its cost and maintenance issues when he completed the RPUD Revision in 2005." Staff Response: The issue of intemal access maintenance is the responsibility of the PUD owners and developer. Section 5.8.H. of the PUD Document clearly outlines the operations and maintenance responsibilities. 3.B.g Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachment F - March 17, 2020 Letter of Concern with Staff Response (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) GRANADA LAKES VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. May 21,2020 Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP Collier County Growth Management 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples. FL 34104 RE: PDI-PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Submiftal #3 Heather Keel, CAM, Cambridge Management of SWFL Laura DeJohn, AICP, Johnson Engineering, Inc. Dear Tim, You have received Submittal #3 from Johnson Engineering regarding the subjea property. I want to restate in plain English regardless ofthe comments made in Submittal #3 rhar the entireproperty (Tracts A&B) is not under unified control and we do not support the proposed revisions to thi RPUD. we will though consider the changes the applicant has requested, provided the applicant makes all the changes we requested, including but not limited to the del;tion of any preserves within Tract A we will be happy ro meet with the various planners to discuss in further details our concems. Sincerely, cc vis email: 145 SANTA CLARA DR NAPLES, FL 3410/t (239) 206'2678 AND SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC|ATION, tNC. Franl Cooper, President Granada Lakes Villas Condominium Association, lnc. Santa Barbara Landings Property Owners Association, lnc. Direct Contact - Tele (239) 250-1300 Email - FCProperties@comcast.net 3.B.h Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attachment G - Other Concern Correspondence (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) we have received your consent Request for the Sanla Barbara Landings lnsubstantial change. Regardless of the process, we can only support your request upon the inclusion ofall the items previously conveyed to you and rim Finn, collier county Growth Management in a letter dated March 17, 2020, of which a copy is attached. Please revise your request accordingly and resubmit. Sincerely, GRANADA LAKES VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. May 12.2020 Laura DeJohn. AICP Johnson Engineering 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 RE: Santa Barbara Landings PDI Dear Laun, Frank Cooper, President Granada Lakes Villas Condominium Association, Inc. Santa Barbara Landings Property Owners Association, Inc. Attachment: Letter Dated 3i 17i20 145 SAi{TA CLARA DR I{APLES, FL 3410a (239) 206-2678 3.B.h Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachment G - Other Concern Correspondence (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) Laura S. DeJohn From: S.nt To: Cc: fcproperties@comcast.net Wednesday. May 05, 2020 1:21 PM Laura S. De.,ohn heatherk@cambridgeswfl.com; rick@nosnownaples.com RE: Construction access drive for Tract g - Santa Barbara Landings pUO That is correct. The Association and unit owners object to the construction traffic using Santa Clara Dr due to residents, including children walking or biking ontheroad. We have requested the County allow the developers to install a temporary construction access point on Santa Barbara directly to Tract B. lf you need further clarification or correspondence please let me know. Sincerely, Frank W. Cooper, President Granada Lakes Villas Condominium Association, lnc. Santa Barbara Landings Property Owners Association, lnc. From: Laura S. OeJohn <L(S@johnsoneng.com> Sent Wednesday, May 6,2020 1:11 PM To: f cproperties@comcast. net Cc: heatherk@cambridgeswfl.com; rick@nosnownaples.com Subject: Construction access drive for Tract B - Santa Barbara Landings pUD Frank, Heather, I understood from the discussions at your December 19, 2019 Board Meeting that residents obiected to construction vehicles using Santa Clara Drive when Tract I of the PUD eventually develops. To address this concern raised at that Board meetin& we have requested that Collier County allow a temporary construction access directly from Santa Barbara Blvd into Tract B for use at time of construction, so construction vehicles would not travel through the existing neiBhborhood. Collier County has asked for written feedback on this topic to document that the HOA obiects to construction vehicles using the existing internal Santa Clara Drive. Ca n you send meeting minutes that capture this, or iust send an email confirming this? That should suffice to address the County's request on this matter. Thank you, Laura Subject: Laura DeJohn, AICP Laura, FC Properties, lnc. 4158 Lorraine Avenue Naples, Fl" 34104 Office (239) 643-s053 Fax (239) 543-5137 cell (239) 2s0-1300 1 3.B.h Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachment G - Other Concern Correspondence (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) Director ot Planniog & tandscape Architecture ,oHt{sot{ E]{ctr{EERt G, tt{c. C€ll: (239) 229-1726 lderohn@iohnsonent.com 2 3.B.h Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment G - Other Concern Correspondence (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) JOHNSQN srr(r 19a 5 ENGINEERING lO: Frank Coopcr F'ROM: kura DcJohn, AICP DATE: Mav 8.2020 RE, Saola Barbara Landings PDI TrEct A conscut form for signalurr Frank. As we discussed by phone, writter consert by the HOA of Tract A of the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD has been requested by the County in their review of the request to rernove the requircrnent for a wall within Tracl A. You have indicated in general there is no objecrion to the rEquesl to remove the requir€rnent for 8 wall within Tracl A, but you Ere concemed about imposition ofany oth€r requir€inents on Tracl A. The lnsubstantial change request to the santa Barbara Landings pDl is not intended to require changes to the existing developed conditions in Tract A, so we have attempt€d to address your concem by ststing this as part of the requested conscnt. Please s€e attachod and retum with your signature (email is fine) ifyou concur. If you'd like to discuss, please feel froe to contact me. Thank you, Laura 12391229-1726 2350 Stanford Coun . Nsplcs, floridE 14l I 2 (239) 4la-0333 . Fax (239) 434-9320 cc: Rick Parlante 3.B.h Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment G - Other Concern Correspondence (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SANTA BARBARA LANDIT{65 RPUO INSUBSTANTIAT CHANGE PETITION PI.'2019@@959 CONSENT Two Tr.ct compdrc thc S.ntr B.rb.r. f.ndlrya RPUD: Tr.st A .rd Tr.Gt B. Tr'ct A of lhe santa Berbara Landints RPUD is built-out rrith the existint developm.nt of Granada lalesvillas condominiums. owners within Tr.cr A are represented by the 5ANTA BARBARA LANDTNG5 PRoPERTY owNER's AssN rNc (address: 145 sanra crara Drive, Napres, Fr,34104) and GRAI{ADA r_AKEs vll"[As coNDoMlNruM AssocrATroN. rNc. (.ddress: r45 santa crara Drive, Napres, Fr.3rtro4]. St. Georae Gtouo. Coro is the owner of Tract B. 5t. Geone croup. coro fired for an rnsubsrantiar change to the santa Barbara Landints Rpuo, idenrified by Collier County as Petition numb€r pL2OI9OOOO959. On behalf of Tnct A, SANTA BARBAM LANoINGS PRoPERW owNER.s ASSN INc and GRANADA I.A(EsvlttAS cO mMlNlUM ASSoclATloN. lNc. cons€nt lo th€ petition requestint tnsubstantial char6e to thesanta Brrbara Landints Rpuo identifu by colier county petition numbcr puo19omo9s9, incruding thepropos€d removal of a condition requiring a wafl aront the Tract A ea$ern boundary, subiect to thefollowing: l The lnsubstantial change petirbn requested by the owner of Tract B recognizes that Trect A is fuly developed and built-out. 2. The lnsubstantiar change p€tition requested by tt'" oryner of rract B wil incrude rantuate in thc puD as pan of the lnsubstantial Change request: Date Tr.ct A: SANTA BAREARA TANDINGS PROPERTY OWNER'S AsSN INC GRANADA I.AKT5 VIttAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, II{C. At tim" of rnrrbrranti"l ch"r"" p"tition puo19(xxp959 Tr".t A i, frll" d"r"loo.d. Th" Itlcl-Ajgyghpment shall be allowed to continue a( it e.ists at time of aonroval of Inrrbrt"ntirl chrn"" P"tition pu019(xx)0959 "nd..id "ooror"r ,"orir", no "h"..tion.or chanees to existinr develooment within Tract A. Frank Cooper President, SANTA BARBAM LANDTNGS pROPERTy OWNER,S ASSN tNC President, GRANAOA LAKES VILLAS CONOOMTNTUM ASSOCtATtON, tNC Name Title: 3.B.h Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attachment G - Other Concern Correspondence (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) Laura S. DeJohn Subject FW: Temporary Construction Access (Santa garbara) From: Sawye rMichael <Michael.Sawver@ colliercountvfl.Pov> S€nt: Tuesday, December 03, 2019 3:55 pM To: Jared R. Brown <i!htQjqb!!9!C!&gg!t> Subrect: RE: Temporary Construction Access (Santa Barbara) Jared, I remember the project. lf the temporary access came up during the zoning-PUD petition then likely we'd simply have add a developer commitment retardin8 the construction access similar to other PUD's, location, timing, restoration, etc. Other than Soing back for an lnsubstantial PUD change you really need to work this out this Matt McLean's group. While we used to address these construction access concerns with ROW permits including time limitations, etc; I don,t know the latest thinking-practice. I know I was copied on an email a few weeks ago for this issue...sorry you haven't gotten a resolution. Miehael Sawyer Principal Planner Gro*th Management Departnent Transponadon Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 michael.sawver(a,colliercounwtl.sor From: Jared R. Brown <irb/a hnsonen .com> Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 20Lg 2:44 pM To: Sawye rMichael <Michae l.Sawver@colli ercountvfl.sov> Cc: Laura S. Dejohn <LKS@ iohnsone -com> Sublect: Temporary Construction Access (Santa Barbara) EXTERNAtEMAIL This email is from an externalsource. conflrm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution whenopenint attachments or cllcking link. Good Oay, Mike. We have been bounced around a little bit on this question and I need to get a clear ansrryer. lf it isn,t you, can you pleasepoint me to the correct person to talk with. To recap the situation: There is an undeveloped parcel (see below) at the corner of Santa Barbara and the calusa park Elementary School. The owner wants confirmation that they will be allowed a temporary construction access off of Santa Barbara in order to avoid running all the heavy construction traffic through the residential neithborhood (cranada Lakes) to the north. Cecilia has pointed out that the spacing between the proposed temp access andlhe Calusa park 1 3.B.h Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Attachment G - Other Concern Correspondence (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) entry does not meet the Access Management Policy and that the PUD does not show an access at that location However, I don't believe either of those apply to a temporary condition. Please confirm or set me straight. Thanks -Jared arcel ,ared R. Brown, P,E,, LIED Ap Projed Manager JOHt{SO Et{ctNEERtr{G, tNC. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, Florida 34112 Phone:239.280.4321 mer 2 lr , \ ,-.(i I I ',itI a ! I Id . ,. \t t r'. aa r] I I I ll l+ 1: a .-\ .t a t / \ \t q -r' R I I , ( \"( \a )I I I i :t 3.B.h Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attachment G - Other Concern Correspondence (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) x 3.B.i Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Attachment H - HEX Hybrid Meeting Waiver (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS RPUD  (PL20190000959)      Application and Supporting Documents    October 22, 2020 HEX Hearing                       Post Office Box 1550 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, Florida 33902-1550 (239) 334-0046 E B 642   3.B.j Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGES TO   PUD AND MASTER PLAN       3.B.j Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 41.6± Acres Located in Section 04, Township 50 S, Range 26 E Collier County, Florida PREPARED FOR: Santa Barbara Garden Villas, LLC 1401 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 401 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 And St. George Group, Corporation 1401 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 40I Coral Gables, Florida 33134 6303 Blue Lagoon Drive Suite 390 Miami, FL 33126 PREPARED BY: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 And D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates 3800 Via del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Insubstantial Change for St. George Group, Corp by: Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 DATE FILED DATE APPROVED BY CPCC DATE APPROVED BY BCC 10-11-2005 ORDINANCE NUMBER 2005-53 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE: _____________ EXHIBIT "A" 3.B.j Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLE i STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE ii SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION I-1 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS II-1 SECTION III RESIDENTIAL "R" DEVELOPMENT AREA III-1 SECTION IV PRESERVE "P" AREA IV-1 SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS V-1 3.B.j Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES EXHIBIT A CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT B SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBIT C LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT D BOUNDARY SURVEY TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS III-3 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline i 3.B.j Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Santa Barbara Garden Villas, LLC and St. George Group, Corporation intends to create a This Residential Planned Unit Development is on approximately 41.6± acres of land located in Section 04., Township 50 S, Range 26 E, Collier County, Florida. Approximately 6.3 acres of the property is encumbered with a 100' wide roadway easement for Santa Barbara Boulevard, making the net site approximately 35.3 acres. The name of the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) shall be Santa Barbara Landings RPUD. The development of the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as established in the Growth Management Plan. The development will be consistent with the policies of the land development regulations adopted under the Growth Management Plan and applicable regulations for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is located within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Sub-District, as identified on the Future Land Use Map. 2. The density provided for in the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD complies with the Density Rating System contained in the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. The subject property is located within the residential density band, which extends from the Mixed-use activity center located at the intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Davis Boulevard. The density permissible is 4 dwelling units per acre. Up to 3 dwelling units per acre may be added within the density band, bringing the permissible base density to 7 dwelling units per acre. Base density Density band Maximum permitted density Requested density 4.0 du/acre + 3.0du/acre = 7.0 du/acre 7.0 du/acre (291 units) At the time of the rezoning application, 248 multiple-family dwellings exist on the site. The subject rezoning will add a maximum of 43 additional dwelling units for a maximum total of 291 dwelling units. All property within the RPUD boundary shall be utilized in calculating the project density. 3. The project development is compatible and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). 4. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with the applicable land development regulations as required in Objective 3 of the FLUE, except as may be modified in this RPUD document 5. All final local development orders for this project are subject to the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance as required in Objective 2 of the FLUE. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline ii 3.B.j Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 6. The design of Santa Barbara Landings RPUD protects the function of the existing drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as required in Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element. 7. This project shall be subject to applicable Sections of the LDC at the time of development order approval, except as otherwise provided herein. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline iii 3.B.j Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE Section I sets forth the location and ownership of the property, and describes the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name Santa Barbara Landings RPUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property being 41.6 acres more or less, is described as: The west half (W. ½) of the west half (W. ½) of the northwest quarter (N.W. ¼) of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, all being situated in Collier County, Florida, less the north 50 feet thereof. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The property is currently owned by: TRACT A: unit owners of the Santa Barbara Garden Villas, LLC Landings Property Owner’s Association Inc. and Granada Lakes Villas Condominium Association Inc., whose address is 145 Santa Clara Drive, Naples, FL 34104, and TRACT B: St. George Group, Corporation, whose address is: 1401 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 401 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 6303 Blue Lagoon Drive Suite 390, Miami, FL 33126 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A. The project is located in Section 04, Township 50, Range 26 and is generally bordered on the north by Radio Road, on the east by Plantation PUD; on the south by Bembridge PUD on the west by Santa Barbara Boulevard. B. The zoning classification of the subject property at the time of RPUD application is RMF-6. C. According to FEMA/FIRM Map Panel Number 120067 415 D, dated June 3, 1986, the property is located within Zone X. D. Soils on the site generally include Hallandale fine sand and Boca, Rivera, Limestone Substratum and Copeland fine sand depressional. E. Existing vegetation on the site consists of melaleuca, Brazilian Pepper, palmetto prairie, pine flatwoood, cypress, Cabbage Palm and disturbed lands. Wetland areas have been heavily impacted by melaleuca. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline I-1 3.B.j Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) F. According to the Collier County Drainage Atlas, the site is located in the Lely Canal Basin. The conceptual water management plan is depicted in the Surface Water Management Report, which accompanied the rezone application submittal. 1.5 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance is known and cited as the "Santa Barbara Landings Residential Planned Unit Development Ordinance." 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline I-2 3.B.j Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PURPOSE Section II delineates and generally describes the plan of development and identifies relationships to applicable County ordinances, policies, and procedures. 2.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT A. Santa Barbara Landings RPUD is a mixed-use residential project and will consist of two development parcels and multiple preservation areas. Categories of land uses include those for residential and preserve areas. The Residential areas are designed to accommodate single-family attached, duplex and multiple family dwellings. The overall project density is 7 dwelling units per acre and the maximum units permitted in the RPUD shall be 291 units. B. Exhibit "A" depicts the RPUD Master Plan. The RPUD Master Plan includes a table that summarizes land use acreage. The location, size and configuration of individual tracts shall be determined at the time of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plat approval. 2.3 COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY ORDINANCES A. Regulations for development of Santa Barbara Landings RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate which authorize the construction of improvements. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards then the provisions of the most similar district in the Land Development Code shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. C. Unless modified, waived or excepted from this RPUD Document or associated exhibits, the provisions of other sections of the land development codes, where applicable, remain in full force and effect with respect to the development of the land that comprises this RPUD. D. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Chapter 6, Adequate Public Facilities, of the Land Development Code. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline II- 1 3.B.j Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2.4 LAND USES Land uses are generally depicted on the RPUD Master Plan, Exhibit A. The specific location and size of individual tracts and the assignment of square footage or units shall be determined by the developer at the time of site development plan approval, preliminary subdivision plat approval, or final subdivision plat approval subject to the provisions of Chapter 10 of the Collier County LDC. 2.5 USE OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY The Developer may utilize land within the rights-of-way within the RPUD for landscaping, decorative entranceways, and unified signage. This utilization is subject to review and administrative approval during the development review process by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator for engineering and safety considerations. 2.6 MODEL HOMES SALES OFFICE AND CONSTRUCTION OFFICE A. Construction offices and other uses and structures related to the promotion and sale of real estate such as, but not limited to, pavilions, parking areas, and signs, shall be permitted principal uses throughout the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD. These uses shall be subject to the requirements of Chapter 5 and Chapter IO of the LDC. B. Model Homes may be permitted in multi-family and townhome buildings may be utilized for wet or dry models, subject to the time frames specified in Chapter 5 of the LDC. 2.7 CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO RPUD DOCUMENT OR RPUD MASTER PLAN Changes and amendments may be made to this RPUD Ordinance or RPUD Master Plan as provided in Chapter 10 of the LDC. Minor changes and refinements as described herein may be made by the Developer in connection with any type of development or permit application required by LDC. 2.8 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS A minimum of 30% of the project (12.48± acres) shall be devoted to usable open space. 2.9 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS A minimum of three (3) acres of native vegetation shall be maintained on the subject site through a combination of preservation of existing native vegetation and revegetation of native vegetation. The areas of retained native vegetation and replanted native vegetation are shown as Preserve areas on the Conceptual Master Plan, Exhibit A. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline II-2 3.B.j Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2.10 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE One or more Property Owner's Association (POA) will provide common area maintenance. The POA, as applicable, shall be responsible for the operation, maintenance, and management of the surface water and stormwater management systems and preserves serving Santa Barbara Landings RPUD, in accordance with any applicable permits from the South Florida Water Management District. 2.11 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS A. The Collier County Planned Unit Development District is intended to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership as set forth in Chapter 2 of the LDC. I. Individual Projects a) Site Planning: Each distinct project within the RPUD will provide an aesthetically appealing, identifiable path of entry for pedestrians and vehicles. The orientation of buildings and structures will be sensitive to adjacent land uses and the surrounding community. b) Landscaping: Where applicable, plantings along public rights-of way will be complimentary to streetscape landscaping. 2.12 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERMS, FENCES AND WALLS A. Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls are generally permitted as a principal use throughout the RPUD, excluding preserves. B. The maximum fence, wall or berm height internal to the RPUD shall be eight (8) feet, not including those portions of walls incorporated into project identification signs. The maximum fence height shall be measured relative to the greater of the crown of the adjacent roadway or the adjacent minimum finished floor, as applicable. The eight (8') foot high precast wall shown on the conceptual master plan shall be constructed along the eastern boundary of Tract B concurrent with development of the residential units in tract B. C. Perimeter Buffers abutting rights-of-way shall be permitted to deviate from the required 20' wide Type D buffer, to permit a Type D buffer an average of 20' in width, with no part of the buffer being less than 15' in width. The minimum area for the combined buffers along Radio Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard shall be 66,129 square feet (1.52± acres). 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline II-3 3.B.j Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2.13 SIGNAGE A. GENERAL Signage shall be consistent with Section 5.06 of the LDC. 2.14 SUBSTITUTIONS TO SUBDIVISION DESIGN STANDARDS / DEVIATIONS 1. The Developer reserves the right to request substitutions to subdivision improvement and utility design standards in accordance with Chapter 10 of the LDC. A. Chapter 6, Sidewalks, bike lanes and bike paths 1. Existing site constraints prohibit retrofitting of the site with sidewalks meeting standards in Chapter 6 of the LDC. 2. A six (6) foot wide sidewalk shall be provided on only one (1) side of the internal local or private roadway exceeding one thousand (1,000) feet in length serving the project's additional 43 unit component. 3. An internal sidewalk connection from the southernmost development tract (Tract B) to the existing pool/club area shall be provided at the time of construction within Tract B. The developer of Tract B shall construct a sidewalk interconnection concurrently with the road interconnection from Tract B to Tract A. The developer of Tract B shall coordinate with the School District of Collier County to construct a sidewalk interconnection from Tract B to the adjacent school property at time of Tract B development permitting. 4. The developer shall make payment-in-lieu of construction of the sidewalk within Santa Barbara Boulevard, due to its programmed improvement in the five-year work program. B. Section 4.06.00, Landscaping, buffering and vegetation retention 1. Perimeter Buffers abutting rights-of-way shall be permitted to deviate from the required 20' wide Type D buffer, to permit a Type D buffer an average of 20' in width, with no part of the buffer being less than 15' in width. The minimum area for the combined buffers along Radio Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard shall be 66,129 square feet (1.52± acres). C. Construction Standards Manual, Streets and access improvements 1. Construction Standards Manual, Street Right-of-Way Width Street right-of-way width: The minimum right-of-way width to be utilized for local streets and cul-de-sacs shall be forty (40) feet. Drive aisles serving multi-family tracts shall not be required to meet this standard. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline II-4 3.B.j Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2. Construction Standards Manual, Dead-end Streets Cul-de-sacs may exceed a length of one thousand (1,000) feet. 3. Construction Standards Manual, Intersection Radii Intersection radii: Street intersections shall be provided with a minimum of a twenty five (25) foot radius (face of curb) for all internal project streets and a thirty-five (35) foot radius for intersections at project entrances. 2.15 GENERAL PERMITTED USES A. Certain uses shall be considered general permitted uses throughout the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD except in the Preserve Areas. General permitted uses are those uses that generally serve the entire RPUD or distinct projects there within. B. General Permitted Uses: 1. Essential services as set forth under Chapter 2 of the LDC. 2. Water management facilities and related structures. 3. Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or other architectural or structural bank treatments. 4. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures. 5. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the Developer and Developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses. 6. Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.12 of this document. 7. Signage. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline II-5 3.B.j Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SECTION III RESIDENTIAL "R" DEVELOPMENT AREAS 3.1 PURPOSE Section III establishes permitted uses and development regulations for areas within the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD that are designated Residential "R" on the RPUD Master Plan. 3.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION A. Areas designated as "R" on the RPUD Master Plan are designed to accommodate multiple family residential types, recreational uses, essential services, and customary accessory uses. Acreage is based on a conceptual design. Actual acreage of the development and preserve areas shall be established at the time of Site Development Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance with the Collier County Land Development Code. Areas designated as "R" accommodate internal roadways, open space, parks and amenity areas, lakes and water management facilities, and other similar facilities that are accessory or customary to residential development. B. Areas designated as "R" are intended to provide a maximum of 291 dwelling units. 3.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES A. Principal Uses and Structures 1. Single-family attached and detached. 2. Duplex and two-family. 3. Multiple-family. 4. Townhomes B. Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Common indoor and outdoor recreational facilities. 2. Sales and leasing facilities. 3. Clubhouse, meeting rooms. 4. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted in this area. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline III-1 3.B.j Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Table I sets forth the development standards for land uses within the "R" Residential District. B. Required Parking: Parking within the residential area shall be provided based on the following standards: 1. Recreation Facilities - 2 per court, 1 per 600 square feet of building area, 1 per 200 square feet of pool water area. No additional parking shall be required for outdoor playground facilities. Up to 10 parking spaces per recreational facility may be directly loaded off a private roadway serving the recreational area. 2. Temporary Model Sales Facility - minimum 6 parking spaces per building. Parking for models or temporary sales facilities shall be permitted to back directly onto private roadways serving the units. C. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein or within the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD, shall be in accordance with the Land Development Code in effect at the time of Site Development Plan approval. Unless otherwise indicated, required yards, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. D. Development standards for uses not specifically set forth in Table I shall be established during the Site Development Plan Approval as set forth in Chapter 4 of the Land Development Code in accordance with those standards of the zoning district which is most similar to the proposed use. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline III-2 3.B.j Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) TABLE I SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR "R" RESIDENTIAL AREAS Permitted Uses and Standards Single Family Detached Zero Lot Line Duplex, Single Family Attached and Townhouse5 Multi-Family Dwellings 5 Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF NA NA Minimum Lot Width 50' 40' NA NA Minimum Lot Depth 100' 100' NA NA Front Yard Setback1 20'/23' 20'/23 20'/23' 20'/23' Side Yard Setback 6' 0' or 6' 0' or6' 15' Rear Yard Setback2 15' 15' 15' 15' Santa Barbara Blvd. R-O-W Setback 20' 20' 20' 20' Rear Yard Accessory Setback2 10' 10' 10' 10' Preserve Setback3 Accessory Principal 10' 25' 10' 25' 10' 25' 10' 25' Maximum Zoned Building Height 2 Stories or 30' 2 Stories or 30' 2 Stories or 30' 2 Stories or 30' Distance Between4 Detached Principal Structures 12' 12' 12' 15' Floor Area Min. (SF) 750 SF 750 SF 750 SF 750 SF All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 1 Front yards shall be measured as follows: A. If the parcel is served by a public right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. B. If the parcel is served by a private road or access easement, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). For multiple family buildings served by an unplatted driveway, no setback shall be required; however, adequate stacking shall be provided to accommodate vehicular parking. For tract B, front entry garage setback shall be a minimum of 23' from private row or back edge of sidewalk. C. For structures with side or rear entry garages, the minimum front yard may be reduced to 12'. 2Rear yards for principal and accessory structures on lots and tracts which abut lake, or open space (non-preserve) may be reduced to O' feet; however, a reduced building setback shall not reduce the width of any required landscape buffer, as may be applicable. 3 For purposes of this Section, accessory structures shall include but not be limited to attached screen enclosures and roofed lanais. 4 A minimum building separation of twelve (12) feet between detached structures. Detached garages may be separated by a minimum of ten (10) feet. 5Attached single-family and multi-family structures within Tract B shall not exceed 4 dwelling units per structure. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline III-3 3.B.j Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SECTION IV PRESERVE "P" AREAS 4.1 PURPOSE Section IV establishes permitted uses and development regulations for areas within Santa Barbara Landings RPUD that are designated as Preserve "P" on the RPUD Master Plan. 4.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as "P" on the RPUD Master Plan are designed to accommodate natural systems existing or created as preserves and limited water management uses and functions. 4.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES A. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, subject to review and approval by local, state & federal agencies as required, for other than the following: B. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1. Boardwalks and nature trails (excluding impervious paved trails). 2. Water management facilities. 3. Any other preserve and related use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals determines to be compatible in the Preserve Area. 4.4 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS A. Building setbacks shall be 20 feet from the RPUD boundary for any permitted structure. B. Maximum zoned height for any structure shall be 20'. 4.5 PRESERVE AREA ADJUSTMENTS The proposed preserve areas depicted on the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Master Plan are intended to meet the native vegetation requirements of the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Collier County LDC. Adjustments may be made to the location of the preservation areas at the time of preliminary plat or site development plan approval based on jurisdictional agency permit requirements. Approximately 6 acres of native vegetation exists on-site at the time of rezoning application. Through retention of existing native vegetation and revegetation of open 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline IV-1 3.B.j Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) spaces on-site, the developer shall provide a minimum of 3 acres of on-site native vegetation, which shall consist of a minimum of 1.5 acres of retained vegetation and 1.5 acres of replanted and enhanced native vegetation. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline IV-2 3.B.j Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the commitments for the development of this project. 5.2 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with Final Site Development Plans, Final Subdivision Plans and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this RPUD, in effect at the time of Final Plat, Final Site Development Plan approval or building permit application as the case may be. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the official County Land Development Code shall apply to this project even if the land within the RPUD is not to be platted. The developer, his successor and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this document. These developer commitments will be enforced through provisions agreed to be included in the declaration of covenants and restrictions or similar recorded instrument. Such provisions must be enforceable by lot owners against the developer, it successors and assigns, regardless of turnover or not to any property or homeowners' association. The developer, his successor or assignee, shall follow the RPUD Master Plan and the regulations of this RPUD as adopted and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor in title or assignee is subject to the commitments within this Agreement. 5.3 RPUD MASTER PLAN A. Exhibit "A", RPUD Master Plan illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed area, lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as Final Platting or Site Development Plan approval. Subject to the provisions of Chapter 10 of the LDC, amendments may be made from time to time. 5.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT/PUD MONITORING REPORT A. The landowners shall proceed and be governed according to the time limits pursuant to Chapter 10 of the LDC. B. Monitoring Report: An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Chapter 10 of the LDC. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-1 3.B.j Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD Insubstantial Change approval dated__________2020, the Managing Entity for Tract B is St. George Group, Corp. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 5.5 ENGINEERING A. This project shall be required to meet all County Ordinances in effect at the time final construction documents are submitted for development approval. B. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with appropriate provisions of the LDC. 5.6 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT In accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), this project shall be designed for a storm event of 3-day duration and 25-year return frequency. A. The project will be permitted with the South Florida Water Management District and copies of the applicable permits will be provided to Collier County prior to issuance of applicable County permits. B. Existing lakes already constructed as of the effective date of this regulation shall be allowed to continue to exist in accordance with the cross sections shown on Surface Water Management Plan, Exhibit "B". Any new lakes must meet the requirements of the then current LDC. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-2 3.B.j Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 5.7 UTILITIES A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission and interim water and/or sewage treatment facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time approvals are requested. C. Water and wastewater systems shall be constructed in accordance with State of Florida Laws and Collier County's Codes and Ordinances. D. All construction plans, technical specifications and hydraulic design reports are to be reviewed and approved in writing by the Engineering Services Department of the Community Development and Environmental Services Division prior to commencement of construction E. Upon completion of construction, all water and wastewater systems within the project shall be tested and must meet minimum County standards and requirements. The system(s), or a portion thereof, that is found to meet the requirements set forth in item #5 below, may then be conveyed to the County for ownership and maintenance. F. If County's utility system does not have access readily available to serve a project within the County's service area, extensions to the County infrastructure may be required. All required extensions shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer, fiscally and otherwise (time and schedule), unless such extension has been previously defined in the County Water and/or Wastewater Master Plan. In such case, the developer may negotiate an upsizing agreement with the County. If it is determined by the County that neither of these two options are feasible, in interim system may be considered. G. Items on the following list shall be conveyed to the County for ownership and maintenance upon approval from the Board of County Commissioners if they are located within a County right-of-way or County Utility Easement (CUE), are in compliance with the latest revision of the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance, and are connected to the County Water, Wastewater or Reclaimed Systems: 1. Potable water lines 6" or larger, including water meters and backflow devices that are not on fire lines. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-3 3.B.j Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2. Gravity wastewater lines 8" or larger. 3. Wastewater lift stations that are located within a CUE. 4. Force mains 4" or larger. 5. CUE's that are determined to be necessary to access and maintain utility systems and structures. 6. Non-potable irrigation water lines 6" or larger, including the water meter and backflow devices. For potable and reclaimed water distribution systems that will not be conveyed to the County, a master meter shall be required. Such systems shall be owned and maintained by the applicant, his successor or assigns, from the customer side of the master meter and backflow device or the check valve at the property line or County Utility Easement limit. School and park developments are included in the list of types of developments whose internal systems the applicant or assigns shall be responsible to own and maintain. H. Private lift stations shall conform to the same specifications that apply to public lift stations, unless a Deviation from the Ordinance has been granted in advance and writing by the County Wastewater. The lift station Control Package shall include an operable Telemetry Control System, as specified by County Standards. I. The developer will pay all impact fees in accordance with the latest revision of the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, Code of Laws Section 74.303(d). J. PUD's and DRI's shall have only one master pump station. K. Lift station easement areas shall be designed to 30 feet by 30 feet, or twice the wetwell depth by twice the wetwell depth, whichever is larger. L. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, Code of Laws Chapter 118, solid waste disposal shall be required in the form of bulk containers service (garbage dumpsters and/or compactors) for all commercial and industrial establishments, unless authorization for alternative means of disposal is approved by the Public Utilities Division. Bulk container service shall be required to all multi-family projects not receiving curbside pickup. Solid waste disposal shall be required in the form of curbside pickup for all units on the annual Mandatory Trash Collection and Disposal Special Assessment Roll's. All individual units within a deed-restricted area must have an enclosed location other than the residential structure, such as a carport or garage for the storage of individual solid waste containers, or as otherwise permitted in Section 5.03.04 of the LDC. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-4 3.B.j Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) M. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, Code of Laws Chapter 118, all provisions and facilities for solid waste collection and disposal shall conform to all portions of Section 5.03.04 (Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) of the latest edition of the LDC. 5.8 TRAFFIC The development of this RPUD Master Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. All traffic control devices, signs, pavement markings and design criteria shall be in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards (MUMS), current edition, FDOT Design Standards, current edition, and the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), current edition. All other improvements shall be consistent with and as required by the Collier county Land Development code (LDC). B. Arterial level street lighting shall be provided at all access points. Access lighting must be in place prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (CO). C. Site-related improvements necessary for safe ingress and egress to this project, as determined by Collier County, shall not be eligible for impact fee credits. All required improvements shall be in place and available to the public prior to the issuance of the first CO. D. Road impact fees shall be paid in accordance with Collier County Ordinance 01- 13, as amended, Code of Laws Chapter 74 and Chapter 6 and Chapter 10 of the LDC, as it may be amended. E. All work within Collier County rights-of-way or public easements shall require a Right-of-way Permit. F. All proposed median opening locations shall be in accordance with the Collier County Access Management Policy (Resolution 01-247), as it may be amended, and the LDC, as it may be amended. Collier County reserves the right to modify or close any median opening existing at the time of approval of this RPUD which is found to be adverse to the health, safety and welfare of the public. Any such modifications shall be based on, but are not limited to, safety, operational circulation, and roadway capacity. G. Nothing in any development order shall vest a right of access in excess of a right in/right out condition at any access point. Neither will the existence of a point of ingress, a point of egress or a median opening, nor the lack thereof, shall be the basis for any future cause of action for damages against the County by the developer, its successor in title, or assignee. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-5 3.B.j Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) H. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks and interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer and Collier Country shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. I. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of existing County right- of-way or easement, compensating right-of-way, shall be provided without cost to Collier County as a consequence of such improvement. J. If, in the sole opinion of Collier County, a traffic signal, or other traffic control device, sign or pavement marking improvement within a public right-of-way or easement is determined to be necessary, the cost of such improvement shall be borne by the developer and shall be paid to Collier County before the issuance of the first CO. K. Upon written request by Collier County the property owner shall dedicate, to Collier County without compensation, an area of approximately 721± square feet for road right-of-way purposes, as depicted on the RPUD Conceptual Master Plan. L. A temporary construction access for all site work and vertical construction on Tract B shall be located along Santa Barbara Boulevard, as shown on the PUD Master Plan and subject to issuance of the appropriate right-of-way permit. Temporary construction access shall be limited to one year from issuance of development permit (PPL or SDP). To limit the access to construction activities only, signage is required to indicate Construction Only, and barricades are required to block access during non-working hours. Prior to final approval by the County, the temporary access shall be totally removed, and right-of-way shall be restored. 5.9 PLANNING Pursuant to Chapter 2 of the LDC, if during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted. 5.10 ENVIRONMENTAL A. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic-free) plan for the site, shall be submitted to Environmental Services Staff for review and approval prior to Final Site Development Plan/Construction Plan approval for all parcels included on that project. All category 1 invasive exotic plants as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Council shall be removed in Preserve areas, and annual removal (in perpetuity) shall be the responsibility of the property owner. A.B. A minimum of (3.0 acres) of the on-site native vegetation shall be retained or revegetated, consistent with Chapter 3 of the LDC as conceptually shown as preserve areas on the Exhibit "A", Conceptual RPUD Master Plan. C. Setbacks from preserves shall be as required in the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD, Table I. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-6 3.B.j Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) D. All preserve areas shall be designated as conservation/preservation tracts or easements on all construction plans and shall be so dedicated on all plats or recorded as an easement for site plans pursuant to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes, for plats and be dedicated to the project's homeowners' association or like entity for ownership and maintenance responsibility, and to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance. All documentation necessary to record conservation easements over the preserve areas shall be provided prior to the next SDP approval for this RPUD. E. This RPUD shall comply with the guidelines of the USFWS and FFWCC for impacts to protected species. A habitat management plan for those species shall be submitted to environmental review staff for review and approval prior to site plan approval. F. This RPUD shall be in compliance with the Growth Management Plan, and LDC, except as may be modified herein, at the time of final development order approval. G. A Preserve Management Plan shall be provided to environmental staff for approval prior to site/construction plan approval identifying methods to address treatment of invasive exotic species, fire management and maintenance. A SFWMD jurisdictional determination shall be shown on the site development plan. H. All approved agency permits shall be submitted prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. I. A replanting plan for the re-created preserve areas shall be provided at the time of next development order submittal. Perimeter berms shall be located outside of all upland/wetland preserves. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-7 3.B.j Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 5.11 HOUSING A. The developer or successors and assigns shall pay the sum of $1,000.00 to Collier County from the closing of each of the dwelling units constructed within Tract "B" of the RPUD. The payment shall be made within seven (7) days of the closing of the residential unit. AB. The developer or successors and assigns shall require a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the dwelling units developed within Tract B of the RPUD to be initially sold to individuals or families that use the dwelling unit as their primary residence. The deed to the initial purchaser shall include a restriction that the initial purchaser shall use the unit as their primary residence. C. The developer or successors and assigns agrees to make available for sale a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the dwelling units at a sales price less than $240,000.00. BD. The developer or successors and assigns agrees to sell a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the total number of dwelling units constructed within Tract B of the RPUD to persons employed in Collier County and earning a family income ranging between 100% and 125 that is up to 140% of the County's median income. 6/23/20 PDI-PL20190000959 – Strike/Underline V-8 3.B.j Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE 2/27/20 8' PRE CAST WALL (TRACT B)SANTA CLARA DRIVEROAD & SIDEWALK INTERCONNECTIONROAD & SIDEWALK INTERCONNECTIONINSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE 5/6/20Calusa Park School sidewalk interconnectionTEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS WITH RIGHT TURN LANETract B connection to School and construction access labelsSIDEWALK INTERCONNECTION - Final design to be coordinated with School District and Calusa Park Elementary AVERAGE AVERAGEERAGAVERAGEVERAG20' 0'0(i(min. (i15') TYPETYDINSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE 9/23/20Correction to buffer label per PUD3.B.jPacket Pg. 150Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Tract B connection to School and construction access labelsINSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE 2/27/208' PRE CAST WALL (TRACT B) SANTA CLARA DRIVETEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS WITH RIGHT TURN LANEROAD & SIDEWALK INTERCONNECTIONROAD & SIDEWALK INTERCONNECTIONSIDEWALK INTERCONNECTION - Final design to be coordinated with School District and Calusa Park Elementary INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE 5/6/20Calusa Park School sidewalk interconnectionAVERAGE AVERAGEAVERAGAVERAVERA20' 0'''((ii(min. 15')5'TTYPEDINSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE 9/23/20Correction to buffer label per PUD3.B.jPacket Pg. 151Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara COVER LETTER     3.B.j Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2350 Stanford Court ■Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 434-0333 ■ Fax (239) 434-9320 SINCE 1946 July 1, 2019 Mr. Tim Finn, Principal Planner c/o Intake Team Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: PL20190000959 - Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Ordinance 05-53, Collier County Dear Mr. Finn, Enclosed is a petition for Insubstantial Change (PDI) to the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD. The RPUD is comprised of two Tracts: Tract A is built out and Tract B remains developable. This PDI request is for changes that clarify that each tract of the RPUD is subject to the conditions applicable to each tract. At the April 29, 2019 Pre-Application Meeting for this project, Heidi Ashton Cicko suggested further discussion with Housing staff, because proposed changes related to housing policy could potentially elevate the petition to a PUD Amendment application. In a meeting with Cormac Giblin and Hilary Halford on May 23, 2019, these refinements to the requested changes to housing conditions were determined:  The proposed change to remove the $1,000 payment condition is allowable as a minor change per the LDC.  A change is proposed to clarify that the 50% primary resident condition applies to units to be developed in Tract B, the only developable tract.  Property Appraiser records are provided to demonstrate that over 50% of the total allowable 291 units in the RPUD have sold below $240,000. We propose to remove this condition because it has been satisfied.  A change is proposed to the condition for sale of 10% of units to be constructed in Tract B, the only developable tract, to owners employed in Collier County. We propose adjustment to the referenced income level as 140% or less of median income, which Housing staff advised is consistent with Board income level policies for workforce housing. The proposed changes to housing conditions are refined to be minor or insubstantial according to LDC provisions and according to Property Appraiser records demonstrating that one condition has been met. This request also includes proposed insubstantial changes to conditions related to a wall, sidewalk, and environmental requirements to generally clarify that each tract of the RPUD is subject to the conditions applicable to each tract. The enclosed petition package provides detail and justification for these changes as Insubstantial Changes to a PUD (PDI). We appreciate your consideration of this request. If you have any comments or questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. Laura DeJohn, AICP Principal Planner 3.B.j Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))     APPLICATION     3.B.j Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 1 of 4 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PUD (PDI) LDC subsection 10.02.13 E & Code of Laws section 2-83 – 2-90 Ch. 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner’s approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application . PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): ______________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: __________________________________________ Address: __________________________City: _____________ State: _______ ZIP: __________ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ___________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ________________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: ______________________City: _______________ State: _________ ZIP: __________ Telephone: _____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: _________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ DETAIL OF REQUEST On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. To be completed by staff 3.B.j Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 2 of 4 PROPERTY INFORMATION PUD NAME: _______________________ ORDINANCE NUMBER: ________________________ FOLIO NUMBER(S): _____________________________________________________________ Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? Yes No If no, please explain: _______________________________________________________ Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? Yes No If yes, in whose name? _____________________________________________________ Has any portion of the PUD been SOLD and/or DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? Yes No If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. 3.B.j Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 3 of 4 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Insubstantial Change Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 Pre-Application Meeting notes 1 Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes and why amendment is necessary 1 Detail of request 1 Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy 1 Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy 1 Revised Text and any exhibits PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance # Warranty Deed Legal Description 1 Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended If PUD is platted, include plat book pages List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Copy of 8 ½ in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: •Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. •Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Included in PUD document N/A N/A 3.B.j Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 4 of 4 PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams and David Berra Emergency Management: Dan Summers Naples Airport Authority: Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Other: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS  PUD Amendment Insubstantial (PDI): $1,500.00  Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00  Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 Same fee applies if the petition is referred to the Collier County Planning Commission, where the CCPC serves as the deciding authority instead of the HEX. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 ____________________________________________ ____________ Agent/Owner Signature Date ____________________________________________ Applicant/Owner Name (please print) x x x 3.B.j Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))     LEGAL DESCRIPTION     3.B.j Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))   PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE     3.B.j Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)2S2-2400 FAX: (239) 2S2-6358 PROPERTY OWNEHSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of app lication, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a.If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b.If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership St. George Group, Corp 6303 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 390, Miami, FL 33126 LIST OFFICERS & STOCKHOLDERS identify% A'fJ..hR�c.fo 3. R\1c0Jo \'l. lo<>,o c.If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 3.B.j Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) Armando J. Bucelo, Jr. 3.B.j Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) Department of State /Division of Corporations /Search Records /Detail By Document Number / DIVISION OF CORPORATIONSFlorida Department of State Page 1 of 2Detail by Entity Name 2/18/2020http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entity... 3.B.j Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) Document Number FEI/EIN Number Date Filed State Status Detail by Entity Name Florida Profit Corporation ST. GEORGE GROUP, CORP Filing Information P20000013232 NONE 02/06/2020 FL ACTIVE Principal Address 6303 BLUE LAGOON DRIVE SUITE 390 MIAMI, FL 33126 UN Mailing Address 6303 BLUE LAGOON DRIVE SUITE 390 MIAMI, FL 33126 UN Registered Agent Name & Address BUCELO, ARMANDO J, JR 6303 BLUE LAGOON DRIVE SUITE 390 MIAMI, FL 33126 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title P BUCELO, ARMANDO J, JR 6303 BLUE LAGOON DRIVE MIAMI, FL 33126 UN Annual Reports No Annual Reports Filed Document Images 02/06/2020 -- Domestic Profit View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations Page 2 of 2Detail by Entity Name 2/18/2020http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entity... 3.B.j Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) $ 0 $ 716,350 $ 0 $ 716,350 $ 369,624 $ 346,726 $ 716,350 $ 346,726 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No 00400246503 Site Address *Disclaimer Site City Site Zone *Note Name / Address ST GEORGE GROUP CORP 3310 GRANADA BLVD City CORAL GABLES State FL Zip 33134 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres  *Estimated 5B04 000100 033 5B04 4 50 26 6.74 Legal 4 50 26 THAT PORTION OF THE W1/2 OF THE W1/2 OF THE NW1/4 AS DESC IN OR 3920 PG 1399 Millage Area 301 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 5.083 6.4933 11.5763 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 11/01/05 3920-1399 2019 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (-) 10% Cap (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 2/18/2020http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/recorddetail.html?sid=497468706&Map=No&FolioNum=004... 3.B.j Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))     AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION     3.B.j Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) _______________________ _ (print name), as .{\•e�\&e(\,� (title, if I, ArmandoBucelo applicable) of sT. GEORGE GROUP . CORP . (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner[ZJ applicant[Z]contract purchaserOand that: *Notes: 1.I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2.All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3.I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4.The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5.We/I authorize Laura DeJohn (Johnson Engineering, Inc.) in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. to act as our/my representative •If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. •If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (LC.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." •If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. •If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. •If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". •In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed fore me on 6/ d)L/ /I 9 (date) byJurtQ, .;2.0I 'P ( A je bAnJ¢ "3. Ev co,la. �-) (name of p rson providi[goath ffirmation), as > f .., I who is personally known to me who has produce1 (type of identification) as identification. ,.(j STAMP/SEAL Sig ature of Notary Public CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/24/14 3.B.j Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))   WARRANTY DEED     3.B.j Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))     NARRATIVE OF REQUEST, JUSTIFICATION   & GMP CONSISTENCY   3.B.j Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2350 Stanford Court ■Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 434-0333 ■ Fax (239) 434-9320 SINCE 1946   Santa Barbara Landings RPUD  Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI)  PL20190000959  Narrative & Detail of Insubstantial Change Request        This petition is for an Insubstantial Change (PDI) to the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD originally adopted  by Ordinance 05‐53.  The RPUD is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, south of Radio  Road and north of Davis Boulevard in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.      The ±41.6‐acre RPUD is comprised of two development tracts.  At the time of original rezoning from RFM‐ 6 to PUD, the northerly ±35.3‐acre tract was developed with 248 multifamily dwelling units, which is now  a condominium community known as Granada Lakes Villas.  The southerly +6.3 acres designated as Tract  B was approved for a maximum of 43 mixed residential dwelling units.  Tract B remains undeveloped and  is not part of the condominium and is independent from that condominium association.  The petitioner  for the original rezoning remains the owner of Tract B, and is requesting an Insubstantial Change (PDI) to  the RPUD.      The proposed changes are to clarify the conditions applicable to the Tract B development site by  eliminating outdated requirements or modifying to clarify applicability of the conditions to the respective  Tract.      Changes are numbered #1 through #4, addressing conditions related to a #1‐wall, #2‐sidewalk, #3‐ environmental, and #4‐housing, as described below:    CHANGE #1: Landscape Buffers, Berms, Fences and Walls Condition 2.12.B requires that the eight (8')  foot high precast wall shown on the conceptual master plan shall be constructed concurrent with  development of the residential units in Tract B.    The PUD master plan shows the wall extending for the full length of Tract A and Tract B along the eastern  PUD boundary.  This full length totals approximately 2,757 feet (just over half a mile).     A change is proposed to Condition 2.12.B and the PUD master plan to require the wall along the eastern  boundary of Tract B only.   The table below summarizes the existing conditions, buffer standards, and proposed change:              3.B.j Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))    Narrative & Detail of Request   PL20190000959 – Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI   Page 2         Zoning / Use     Adjacent  Zoning / Use  LDC §4.06.02  buffer  requirement    RPUD buffer  requirement    Proposed  buffer   Tract B   eastern boundary  (480 linear feet)  RPUD   Proposed  multifamily   (43 units)  PUD  Existing single  family   (3 homesites)    15’ wide  Type B  15’ wide  Type B with  8’ pre cast  wall and  Preserve  area per  Master Plan      Same   Tract A   eastern boundary  (2,277 linear feet)  RPUD  Existing  multifamily:  Granada Lakes  Villas  condominiums  PUD  Existing  multifamily:  Villas of Capri  apartments &   Furse Lakes  condominiums    10’ wide  Type A   (trees  spaced 30’  on center)    15’ wide  Type B with  8’ pre cast  wall    15’ wide  Type B    The Granada Lakes Villas community has occupied Tract A adjacent to the multifamily neighborhoods to  the east (Villas of Capri Apartments and Furse Lakes condominiums) since prior to adoption of this  condition in 2005.  The communities have continued to exist without a wall separating them from one  another for fourteen years.    Requiring a wall along the Tract A boundary at the time of Tract B development constitutes a requirement  for an approximately 2,277‐foot long wall on common areas of Granada Lakes Villas, which has a separate  condominium association independent of Tract B.  The following considerations support that removing the  condition  for  a  wall  along  the Tract  A  eastern  boundary  has  no detrimental  effect  on  the  existing  communities and compatibility will continue to be provided for the existing communities:    The existing communities along both sides of the Tract A eastern boundary are compatible  multifamily neighborhoods.  Tract A is built out with 248 multifamily units.  Plantation PUD to the  east is a closed‐out PUD and is built‐out with 331 multifamily units.    The existing conditions along both sides of the Tract A eastern boundary line exceed the standard  code requirement for a 10’ wide Type A buffer between adjoining multifamily developments.  Tract  A‐Granada Lakes Villas is subject to a 15’ wide Type B buffer per the Master Plan.  Tract A has at  least 30 feet of landscaped area and open space along most of eastern boundary, with some  greater degrees of buffering provided by lakes and additional green space.  To the east within the  adjoining Plantation PUD, landscaped areas and open space along the roadways of Tara Circle  and Plantation Circle provide additional buffering along the shared boundary.     Given the adjoining communities are built‐out, and with the existing features of the roadways and  open space along the shared boundary, there is no potential for new incompatibilities to arise  because no residential homesites could be added on either side of the Tract A eastern boundary.  3.B.j Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))    Narrative & Detail of Request   PL20190000959 – Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI   Page 3    The potential development on Tract B per the RPUD approved Master Plan does not result in any change  to the existing Tract A‐Granada Lakes Villas site conditions.  The requirement for a wall along the Tract A  boundary  to  separate  the  existing multifamily  communities  does  not  appropriately  relate  to  the  development of residential units in Tract B, and it is not feasible for the developer of Tract B to construct  on the property of a third party.   The existing buffered condition along the Tract A eastern boundary  provides adequate buffering along the boundary of the community, exceeding the code standard of a 10’  wide Type A buffer.  The request to remove the wall requirement along the Tract A eastern boundary has  no detrimental effect on the existing communities, and compatibility will continue to be provided for the  existing communities.  The proposed change to the language and Master Plan clarifies the condition to indicate that a wall is to  be constructed along the Tract B eastern boundary at time of Tract B development.     CHANGE #2:  Sidewalks, bike lanes and bike paths Condition 2.14.A.3 requires that an internal sidewalk  connection from the southernmost development tract (Tract B) to the existing pool/club area shall be  provided at the time of construction within Tract B.    Condition 2.14.A.3 is proposed to be modified to require interconnection of the internal sidewalk  concurrent with the road interconnection from Tract B to Tract A, consistent with LDC Section 6.06.02.B.    The construction of a sidewalk connecting new residents of Tract B to the common area and amenities of  a separate condominium association in Tract A does not appropriately relate to the development of  residential units in Tract B.  It is not feasible for the developer of Tract B to construct in common areas of  Granada Lakes Villas, which has a separate condominium association.  The minimum standard for a 6‐foot  wide sidewalk is identified in PUD Section 2.14.A.2.  The interconnection of the internal sidewalks as  proposed is consistent with County standards to provide linkages to serve pedestrian needs between  development areas.      CHANGE #3:  Environmental Conditions in 5.10.A, D, E, G and I refer to requirements for:  exotic vegetation  management plan, conservation easement dedication, habitat management plan, preserve management  plan, and that a replanting plan for the re‐created preserve areas shall be provided at the time of next  development order submittal.    The petitioner proposes to clarify that the requirements are applicable to each tract.    No change is proposed to the required preserve areas or associated easement dedication, or requirements  for management plan or re‐created preserves.  The proposed changes are to clarify that the developer of  Tract B is not responsible for conditions applicable to Tract A, because it is not feasible for the developer  of Tract B to commit to management plans, easements, or replanting for common areas of Granada Lakes  Villas.  Wording is added so that the conditions apply to each tract at the time of permitting for each tract.           3.B.j Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))    Narrative & Detail of Request   PL20190000959 – Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI   Page 4    CHANGE #4:  Housing Conditions – the following changes are proposed:    5.11.A Contribution. The developer or successors and assigns shall pay the sum of $1,000.00 to  Collier County from the closing of each of the dwelling units constructed within Tract “B" of the  RPUD. The payment shall be made within seven (7) days of the closing of the residential unit.    Condition 5.11.A is proposed to be removed.   Removal of this contribution commitment qualifies as a minor text change per LDC Section  10.02.13.E.3.c.  Because the petitioner requests additional proposed changes to the RPUD, this  change is proposed as part of an insubstantial change (PDI) request.        5.11.B Primary residence. The developer or successors and assigns shall require a minimum of  fifty percent (50%) of the dwelling units developed within the RPUD to be initially sold to  individuals or families that use the dwelling unit as their primary residence.  The deed to the initial  purchaser shall include a restriction that the initial purchaser shall use the unit as their primary  residence.    Condition 5.11.B is proposed to be amended to reflect the condition applies to Tract B.   Property Appraiser records and primary residency records are not available to determine whether  50% of the dwelling units within the RPUD sold to primary residents.  This condition is proposed  to be clarified to reflect that the condition applies to Tract B, the only developable tract.     5.11.C Maximum price point. The developer or successors and assigns agrees to make available  for sale a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the dwelling units at a sales price less than $240,000.     Condition 5.11.C is proposed to be removed.    Property Appraiser records document that this condition has been met for the RPUD.  Attachment  A  lists  all  initial  transactions  that  occurred  when  Granada  Lakes  Villas  condominiumized,  demonstrating 151 units sold at a sales price less than $240,000, which satisfies the minimum  50% of the total allowable 291 units within the RPUD.  Thus, sales price affordability goals have  been met by this project, and it is appropriate to remove Condition 5.11.C.      5.11.D Employment in Collier County with income requirement. The developer or successors and  assigns agrees to sell a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the total number of dwelling units  constructed within the RPUD to persons employed in Collier County and earning a family income  ranging between 100% and 125% of the County's median income.    Condition 5.11.D is proposed to be amended to reflect the condition applies to Tract B and is to  serve households earning 140% or less of the County’s median income.   This RPUD is subject to standard density calculated according to the base density and residential  density band in proximity to an Activity Center.  There is no affordable housing density bonus  associated with this RPUD.  Employment records and income level records are not available to  3.B.j Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))    Narrative & Detail of Request   PL20190000959 – Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI   Page 5    determine whether purchasers of 10% of the total number of dwelling units within the RPUD have  met the employment status and income levels referenced in Condition 5.11.D.  This condition is  proposed to be clarified to reflect applicability to Tract B, the only developable tract, and that the  target income level is households earning 140% or less of the County’s median income.  This  update to the income level was identified by Cormac Giblin in reference to current County housing  policies.  The proposed updates maintain the objective to provide new housing options that are  affordable to the workforce within Collier County.   3.B.j Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) Granada Lakes Villas Purchase Price Data  from Collier County Property Appraiser Parcel ID Street  Number Street  Name Initial Purchase  Date  (yyyymmdd) Initial Sale  Amount ($) Original Sale  Under $240,000 46573000009 100 SANTA CLARA     20060410 216,900$    1 46573000025 100 SANTA CLARA     20060825 257,900$    0 46573000041 100 SANTA CLARA     20060921 257,900$    0 46573000067 100 SANTA CLARA     20070426 247,000$    0 46573000083 100 SANTA CLARA     20061109 250,000$    0 46573000106 100 SANTA CLARA     20060410 247,800$    0 46573000122 100 SANTA CLARA     20060310 221,900$    1 46573000148 100 SANTA CLARA     20060327 216,900$    1 46573000164 100 SANTA CLARA     20060308 255,900$    0 46573000180 100 SANTA CLARA     20060327 237,900$    1 46573000203 100 SANTA CLARA     20060310 234,900$    1 46573000229 100 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573000245 100 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573000261 100 SANTA CLARA     20060421 234,900$    1 46573000287 100 SANTA CLARA     20061024 228,900$    1 46573000300 100 SANTA CLARA     20060606 254,900$    0 46573000326 108 SANTA CLARA     20060526 214,900$    1 46573000342 108 SANTA CLARA     20060526 232,900$    1 46573000368 108 SANTA CLARA     20060308 219,900$    1 46573000384 108 SANTA CLARA     20060526 249,200$    0 46573000407 108 SANTA CLARA     20060209 210,900$    1 46573000423 108 SANTA CLARA     20061226 252,000$    0 46573000449 108 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573000465 108 SANTA CLARA     20060310 213,900$    1 46573000481 108 SANTA CLARA     20061109 250,000$    0 46573000504 108 SANTA CLARA     20061009 239,900$    1 46573000520 108 SANTA CLARA     20060327 277,900$    1 46573000546 108 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573000562 108 SANTA CLARA     20061218 248,900$    0 46573000588 108 SANTA CLARA     20061222 264,300$    0 46573000601 108 SANTA CLARA     20060410 257,900$    0 46573000627 108 SANTA CLARA     20060308 207,900$    1 46573000643 116 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573000669 116 SANTA CLARA     20060502 185,900$    1 46573000685 116 SANTA CLARA     20060410 161,900$    1 46573000708 116 SANTA CLARA     20060616 160,900$    1 46573000724 116 SANTA CLARA     20060421 161,900$    1 46573000740 116 SANTA CLARA     20060421 171,900$    1 46573000766 116 SANTA CLARA     20060421 185,900$    1 46573000782 116 SANTA CLARA     20060421 181,900$    1 46573000805 116 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573000821 116 SANTA CLARA     20071228 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI ‐ PL20190000959 33 = no dollar amount was indicated for the initial sale in Property Appraiser records Page 1 ATTACHMENT A 3.B.j Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) Granada Lakes Villas Purchase Price Data  from Collier County Property Appraiser Parcel ID Street  Number Street  Name Initial Purchase  Date  (yyyymmdd) Initial Sale  Amount ($) Original Sale  Under $240,000 46573000847 116 SANTA CLARA     20060310 197,900$    1 46573000863 116 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573000889 116 SANTA CLARA     20060410 185,900$    1 46573000902 116 SANTA CLARA     20060510 196,900$    1 46573000928 116 SANTA CLARA     20060222 199,900$    1 46573000944 116 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573000960 124 SANTA CLARA     20060705 153,900$    1 46573000986 124 SANTA CLARA     20060705 172,900$    1 46573001008 124 SANTA CLARA     20060209 160,900$    1 46573001024 124 SANTA CLARA     20060327 159,900$    1 46573001040 124 SANTA CLARA     20070620 180,900$    1 46573001066 124 SANTA CLARA     20060209 170,900$    1 46573001082 124 SANTA CLARA     20060308 173,900$    1 46573001105 124 SANTA CLARA     20060526 153,400$    1 46573001121 124 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573001147 124 SANTA CLARA     20061218 200,000$    1 46573001163 124 SANTA CLARA     20080912 157,000$    1 46573001189 124 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573001202 124 SANTA CLARA     20011228 46573001228 124 SANTA CLARA     20060616 161,900$    1 46573001244 124 SANTA CLARA     20060616 162,900$    1 46573001260 124 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573001286 132 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573001309 132 SANTA CLARA     20060410 228,900$    1 46573001325 132 SANTA CLARA     20060310 218,900$    1 46573001341 132 SANTA CLARA     20060526 219,900$    1 46573001367 132 SANTA CLARA     20060316 237,900$    1 46573001383 132 SANTA CLARA     20060209 218,900$    1 46573001406 132 SANTA CLARA     20080822 215,000$    1 46573001422 132 SANTA CLARA     20070613 266,900$    0 46573001448 132 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573001464 132 SANTA CLARA     20060606 248,300$    0 46573001480 132 SANTA CLARA     20060502 234,900$    1 46573001503 132 SANTA CLARA     20060316 245,200$    0 46573001529 132 SANTA CLARA     20060526 241,900$    0 46573001545 132 SANTA CLARA     20060327 234,900$    1 46573001561 132 SANTA CLARA     20060222 236,900$    1 46573001587 132 SANTA CLARA     20060510 244,900$    0 46573001600 142 SANTA CLARA     20060327 162,900$    1 46573001626 142 SANTA CLARA     20060421 163,900$    1 46573001642 142 SANTA CLARA     20060308 170,900$    1 46573001668 142 SANTA CLARA     20071228 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI ‐ PL20190000959 33 = no dollar amount was indicated for the initial sale in Property Appraiser records   Page 2 3.B.j Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) Granada Lakes Villas Purchase Price Data  from Collier County Property Appraiser Parcel ID Street  Number Street  Name Initial Purchase  Date  (yyyymmdd) Initial Sale  Amount ($) Original Sale  Under $240,000 46573001684 142 SANTA CLARA     20060223 159,900$    1 46573001707 142 SANTA CLARA     20060308 164,900$    1 46573001723 142 SANTA CLARA     20060502 168,900$    1 46573001749 142 SANTA CLARA     20060223 153,900$    1 46573001765 142 SANTA CLARA     20060421 176,900$    1 46573001781 142 SANTA CLARA     20060308 188,900$    1 46573001804 142 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573001820 142 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573001846 142 SANTA CLARA     20060209 174,900$    1 46573001862 142 SANTA CLARA     20060925 195,600$    1 46573001888 142 SANTA CLARA     20060705 187,900$    1 46573001901 142 SANTA CLARA     20060502 181,500$    1 46573001927 150 SANTA CLARA     20060510 174,000$    1 46573001943 150 SANTA CLARA     20070328 180,100$    1 46573001969 150 SANTA CLARA     20060327 170,900$    1 46573001985 150 SANTA CLARA     20060705 170,900$    1 46573002007 150 SANTA CLARA     20060223 161,900$    1 46573002023 150 SANTA CLARA     20060209 171,900$    1 46573002049 150 SANTA CLARA     20060308 173,900$    1 46573002065 150 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573002081 150 SANTA CLARA     20060316 189,900$    1 46573002104 150 SANTA CLARA     200712228 46573002120 150 SANTA CLARA     20171228 46573002146 150 SANTA CLARA     20060316 186,900$    1 46573002162 150 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573002188 150 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573002201 150 SANTA CLARA     20070205 203,500$    1 46573002227 150 SANTA CLARA     20060526 189,900$    1 46573002243 153 SANTA CLARA     20060308 162,900$    1 46573002269 153 SANTA CLARA     20060410 150,700$    1 46573002285 153 SANTA CLARA     20060327 160,900$    1 46573002308 153 SANTA CLARA     20060222 159,900$    1 46573002324 153 SANTA CLARA     20060310 159,900$    1 46573002340 153 SANTA CLARA     20060410 178,100$    1 46573002366 153 SANTA CLARA     20060327 164,900$    1 46573002382 153 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573002405 153 SANTA CLARA     20060502 182,900$    1 46573002421 153 SANTA CLARA     20060616 193,900$    1 46573002447 153 SANTA CLARA     20060421 181,900$    1 46573002463 153 SANTA CLARA     20060421 171,900$    1 46573002489 153 SANTA CLARA     20060616 174,900$    1 46573002502 153 SANTA CLARA     20060421 190,900$    1 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI ‐ PL20190000959 33 = no dollar amount was indicated for the initial sale in Property Appraiser records   Page 3 3.B.j Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) Granada Lakes Villas Purchase Price Data  from Collier County Property Appraiser Parcel ID Street  Number Street  Name Initial Purchase  Date  (yyyymmdd) Initial Sale  Amount ($) Original Sale  Under $240,000 46573002528 153 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573002544 153 SANTA CLARA     20060616 177,900$    1 46573002560 161 SANTA CLARA     20060327 223,900$    1 46573002586 161 SANTA CLARA     20060410 221,900$    1 46573002609 161 SANTA CLARA     20060327 254,900$    0 46573002625 161 SANTA CLARA     20061102 250,000$    0 46573002641 161 SANTA CLARA     20060705 227,900$    1 46573002667 161 SANTA CLARA     20060421 219,900$    1 46573002683 161 SANTA CLARA     20060327 209,900$    1 46573002706 161 SANTA CLARA     20060503 216,900$    1 46573002722 161 SANTA CLARA     20060209 265,900$    0 46573002748 161 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573002764 161 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573002780 161 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573002803 161 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573002829 161 SANTA CLARA     20061207 246,000$    0 46573002845 161 SANTA CLARA     20060705 281,900$    0 46573002861 161 SANTA CLARA     20070315 259,900$    0 46573002887 169 SANTA CLARA     20060308 244,900$    0 46573002900 169 SANTA CLARA     20060502 254,900$    0 46573002926 169 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573002942 169 SANTA CLARA     20060606 211,900$    1 46573002968 169 SANTA CLARA     20060327 240,900$    0 46573002984 169 SANTA CLARA     20061009 252,900$    0 46573003006 169 SANTA CLARA     20060510 222,900$    1 46573003022 169 SANTA CLARA     20070205 224,900$    1 46573003048 169 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573003064 169 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573003080 169 SANTA CLARA     20060421 243,900$    0 46573003103 169 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573003129 169 SANTA CLARA     20060606 235,900$    1 46573003145 169 SANTA CLARA     20060526 243,900$    0 46573003161 169 SANTA CLARA     20080912 215,000$    1 46573003187 169 SANTA CLARA     20061109 248,900$    0 46573003200 177 SANTA CLARA     20060502 164,900$    1 46573003226 177 SANTA CLARA     20061009 201,900$    1 46573003242 177 SANTA CLARA     20060222 182,900$    1 46573003268 177 SANTA CLARA     20060222 171,900$    1 46573003284 177 SANTA CLARA     20060316 165,900$    1 46573003307 177 SANTA CLARA     20060421 169,900$    1 46573003323 177 SANTA CLARA     20061009 182,900$    1 46573003349 177 SANTA CLARA     20060310 164,900$    1 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI ‐ PL20190000959 33 = no dollar amount was indicated for the initial sale in Property Appraiser records   Page 4 3.B.j Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) Granada Lakes Villas Purchase Price Data  from Collier County Property Appraiser Parcel ID Street  Number Street  Name Initial Purchase  Date  (yyyymmdd) Initial Sale  Amount ($) Original Sale  Under $240,000 46573003365 177 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573003381 177 SANTA CLARA     20060510 200,900$    1 46573003404 177 SANTA CLARA     20060310 197,900$    1 46573003420 177 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573003446 177 SANTA CLARA     20060222 175,900$    1 46573003462 177 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573003488 177 SANTA CLARA     20061109 190,000$    1 46573003501 177 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573003527 185 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573003543 185 SANTA CLARA     20060502 149,300$    1 46573003569 185 SANTA CLARA     20060308 170,900$    1 46573003585 185 SANTA CLARA     20060616 163,000$    1 46573003608 185 SANTA CLARA     20060616 150,900$    1 46573003624 185 SANTA CLARA     20060308 170,900$    1 46573003640 185 SANTA CLARA     20060308 173,900$    1 46573003666 185 SANTA CLARA     20060222 162,900$    1 46573003682 185 SANTA CLARA     20060421 181,900$    1 46573003705 185 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573003721 185 SANTA CLARA     20060705 195,600$    1 46573003747 185 SANTA CLARA     20060308 170,900$    1 46573003763 185 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573003789 185 SANTA CLARA     20060421 195,900$    1 46573003802 185 SANTA CLARA     20060526 197,800$    1 46573003828 185 SANTA CLARA     20070315 179,900$    1 46573003844 190 SANTA CLARA     20060606 212,900$    1 46573003860 190 SANTA CLARA     20060921 252,000$    0 46573003886 190 SANTA CLARA     20061024 234,900$    1 46573003909 190 SANTA CLARA     20061207 245,000$    0 46573003925 190 SANTA CLARA     20060526 220,900$    1 46573003941 190 SANTA CLARA     20060526 237,100$    1 46573003967 190 SANTA CLARA     20070919 269,900$    0 46573003983 190 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573004005 193 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573004021 193 SANTA CLARA     20060316 174,900$    1 46573004047 193 SANTA CLARA     20060222 188,900$    1 46573004063 193 SANTA CLARA     20060616 164,900$    1 46573004089 193 SANTA CLARA     20060317 160,900$    1 46573004102 193 SANTA CLARA     20060317 170,900$    1 46573004128 193 SANTA CLARA     20060327 164,900$    1 46573004144 193 SANTA CLARA     20060327 174,900$    1 46573004160 193 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573004186 193 SANTA CLARA     20060502 198,900$    1 Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI ‐ PL20190000959 33 = no dollar amount was indicated for the initial sale in Property Appraiser records   Page 5 3.B.j Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) Granada Lakes Villas Purchase Price Data  from Collier County Property Appraiser Parcel ID Street  Number Street  Name Initial Purchase  Date  (yyyymmdd) Initial Sale  Amount ($) Original Sale  Under $240,000 46573004209 193 SANTA CLARA     20080912 167,000$    1 46573004225 193 SANTA CLARA     20060327 196,900$    1 46573004241 193 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573004267 193 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573004283 193 SANTA CLARA     20060502 198,900$    1 46573004306 193 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573004322 194 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573004348 194 SANTA CLARA     20061116 186,900$    1 46573004364 194 SANTA CLARA     20061102 194,200$    1 46573004380 194 SANTA CLARA     20060510 171,900$    1 46573004403 194 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573004429 194 SANTA CLARA     20061218 197,000$    1 46573004445 194 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573004461 194 SANTA CLARA     20060606 162,900$    1 46573004487 194 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573004500 194 SANTA CLARA     20060222 191,700$    1 46573004526 194 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573004542 194 SANTA CLARA     20080912 157,000$    1 46573004568 194 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573004584 194 SANTA CLARA     20061116 189,900$    1 46573004607 194 SANTA CLARA     20061220 189,900$    1 46573004623 194 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573004649 201 SANTA CLARA     20060310 214,900$    1 46573004665 201 SANTA CLARA     20060317 198,900$    1 46573004681 201 SANTA CLARA     20070306 260,000$    0 46573004704 201 SANTA CLARA     20060510 211,900$    1 46573004720 201 SANTA CLARA     20060209 210,900$    1 46573004746 201 SANTA CLARA     20060720 260,500$    0 46573004762 201 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573004788 201 SANTA CLARA     20060222 243,900$    0 46573004801 201 SANTA CLARA     20060807 209,900$    1 46573004827 201 SANTA CLARA     20060606 257,900$    0 46573004843 201 SANTA CLARA     20061218 266,000$    0 46573004869 201 SANTA CLARA     20071228 46573004885 201 SANTA CLARA     20060308 265,900$    0 46573004908 201 SANTA CLARA     20060222 243,900$    0 46573004924 201 SANTA CLARA     20070306 260,000$    0 46573004940 201 SANTA CLARA     20061218 253,300$    0 151 51.89% Total Sales Under $240,000 151 / 291 total allowable units:  Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI ‐ PL20190000959 33 = no dollar amount was indicated for the initial sale in Property Appraiser records   Page 6 3.B.j Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))    Justification for the Insubstantial Change   PL20190000959 – Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI   Page 1  Santa Barbara Landings RPUD  Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI)  PL20190000959  Justification for the Insubstantial Change      The proposed changes are not substantial changes to the RPUD.  Land Development Code Section  10.02.13.E.2 states “an insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a  substantial or minor change.  An insubstantial change to an approved PUD Ordinance shall be  based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13.E.1,” which is stated below with  corresponding explanations that demonstrate the proposed changes are not substantial.     LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1. Substantial changes. Any substantial change(s) to an  approved PUD Ordinance shall require the review and recommendation of the  Planning Commission and approval by the Board of County Commissioners as a PUD  amendment prior to implementation. Applicants shall be required to submit and  process a new application complete with pertinent supporting data, as set forth in  the Administrative Code. For the purpose of this section, a substantial change shall  be deemed to exist where:     a.  A proposed change in the boundary of the PUD;   There is no proposed change to the PUD boundary.      b.  A proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land  use or height of buildings within the development;   There is no proposed change to the number of dwelling units, uses or building  heights. The maximum units allowed will remain 248 units on Tract A (existing  Granada Lakes Villas) and a maximum of 43 mixed residential dwelling units on  Tract B for a total of 291 dwelling units.    c.  A proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation or open space  areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage  previously designated as such, or 5 acres in area;   The acreages and areas dedicated to preservation, recreation and open space  within the RPUD are not proposed to change.    d.  A proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include  institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation,  3.B.j Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))    Justification for the Insubstantial Change   PL20190000959 – Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI   Page 2  conservation or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land  uses;   The land uses within the RPUD are limited to residential and preserve uses.  The  RPUD  does  not  contain  nonresidential  uses  (institutional,  commercial  or  industrial) land uses, therefore, no change or relocation of nonresidential land  uses is proposed.    e.  A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include,  but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic  circulation; or impacts on other public facilities;   No change is proposed to development parameters, therefore, this request does  not result in any increase in impacts from the RPUD.    f.  A change that will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of  vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the  Institute of Transportation Engineers;   No change is proposed to development parameters, therefore, this request does  not result in any increased vehicular traffic.    g.  A change that will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention,  or will otherwise increase stormwater discharges;   The requested changes do not result in a requirement for increased stormwater  retention.    h.  A change that will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would  be incompatible with an adjacent land use;   The proposed changes will not have an adverse impact on adjacent land uses or  lead to incompatible conditions. The Tract A‐Granada Lakes Villas neighborhood  existed adjacent to the multifamily neighborhoods to the east (Villas of Capri  Apartments and Furse Lakes condominiums) prior to adoption of the condition  imposing the requirement for a wall between the two communities in 2005.    The existing communities along both sides of the Tract A boundary  are  compatible multifamily neighborhoods.  Tract A is built out with 248 multifamily  units.  Plantation PUD is a closed out PUD and is built out with 331 multifamily  units.  These  communities  have  continued  to  exist  without  a  wall  separating  them for the past fourteen years since adoption of the condition for a wall along  the Tract A eastern boundary.  The RPUD requires a 15‐foot wide buffer, and  3.B.j Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))    Justification for the Insubstantial Change   PL20190000959 – Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI   Page 3  most of the Granada Lakes Villas project exceeds the requirement with at least  30 feet of landscaped area and open space along most of eastern boundary,  with some greater degrees of buffering provided by lakes and additional green  space.    The adjoining communities are built‐out, and with the existing features of the  roadways and buffering along the shared boundary, there is no potential for new  incompatibilities to arise because no residential homesites could be added along  the Tract A eastern boundary.     No change is proposed to PUD conditions for the eastern boundary of Tract B.       i.  Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to  a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or  other element of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would  increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses;   The proposed change to the PUD is not inconsistent with the LDC or Growth  Management Plan (GMP) and will not increase density or intensity.  See the GMP  Consistency Narrative provided with this petition.     j.  The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of  regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such  change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant  to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. §  380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not  create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County  under this LDC section 10.02.13; or   Not applicable. This project is not within a Development of Regional Impact.    k.  Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to  a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial  modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13.  As described in the justifications above, the proposed changes do not constitute  “Substantial Changes” per LDC section 10.02.13.  3.B.j Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))    GMP Consistency Narrative   PL20190000959 – Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI   Page 1  Santa Barbara Landings RPUD  Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI)  PL20190000959  GMP Consistency Narrative      FLU Element I.A.1. Urban Residential Subdistrict  The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource  constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. This Subdistrict comprises  approximately 93,000 acres and 80% of the Urban Mixed Use District. Maximum eligible residential  density shall be determined through the Density Rating System but shall not exceed 16 dwelling units per  acre except in accordance with the Transfer of Development Rights Section of the Land Development  Code.  The  density  provided  for  in  the Santa  Barbara  Landings  RPUD  (adopted  by  Ordinance  05‐53)  complies with the Density Rating System contained in the Future Land Use Element of the Growth  Management Plan.  No changes are proposed to the approved type or number of dwelling units,  uses, or density.      FLU Element I.B.2.b. Proximity to Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center  If the project is within one mile of a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center and located  within a residential density band, 3 residential units per gross acre may be added. The density band around  a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from  the center of the intersection around which the Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center  is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the  gross acreage of the entire project. Density bands are designated on the Future Land Use Map and shall  not apply within the Estates Designation or for properties within the Coastal High Hazard Area.    No changes are proposed to the approved type or number of dwelling units, uses, or density.  No  changes are proposed to the layout or arrangement of units per the approved RPUD Master Plan.     The Santa Barbara Landings RPUD is located within the residential density band which extends  from the Mixed‐use Activity Center #6 located at the intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and  Davis Boulevard.  The density rating system provides for a base density of 4 dwelling units per acre.   Up to 3 dwelling units per acre may be added within the density band, bringing the permissible  base density to 7 dwelling units per acre.      Ordinance 05‐53 approving the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD indicates the approved density is 7  units per acre consistent with this provision of the GMP.     3.B.j Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))    GMP Consistency Narrative   PL20190000959 – Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI   Page 2  The total acreage of the RPUD is 41.6 acres.  At a density of 7 dwellings per acre, this equates to  291 allowable units.    Tract A is approximately 35.3 acres and is built‐out with 248 multiple family dwellings.   Tract B is approximately 6.3 acres, and a maximum of 43 dwellings are allowed per the  RPUD.    The total number of dwellings within Tract A + Tract B is 248 + 43 = 291, consistent with  the permissible density of 7 dwellings per acre per the GMP.  FLUE Objective 5  Implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and  habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and  further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element.    Sound planning has been provided through the approval process for Santa Barbara Landings RPUD  Ordinance 05‐53.  No changes are proposed to the approved type or number of dwelling units,  uses, or density.  No changes are proposed to the layout or arrangement of units per the approved  RPUD Master Plan.    Protection of environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species and protection of private  property rights were also addressed through that approval process.  No change is proposed to the  required preserve areas or associated easement dedication, or requirements for management plan  or re‐created preserves.  The proposed changes under RPUD Condition 5.10 are to add wording so  that the conditions apply to each tract at the time of permitting for each tract.       Compatibility of land uses is ensured through the proposed changes.  No changes are proposed to  the approved type or number of dwelling units, uses, or density.  No changes are proposed to the  layout or arrangement of units per the approved RPUD Master Plan.  No changes are proposed to  the RPUD landscape buffer types.  No changes are proposed to the condition for a wall to be  constructed along the Tract B eastern property line at time of Tract B development, where the  multifamily tract will abut three existing single family homesites.      The removal of the condition for a wall along the Tract A eastern property line will not change  compatibility for the existing communities along both sides of the Tract A eastern boundary, which  are  compatible  multifamily  neighborhoods.    Tract  A  is  built  out  with  248  multifamily  units.   Plantation PUD to the east is a closed‐out PUD and is built‐out with 331 multifamily units.     The existing conditions along both sides of the Tract A eastern boundary line exceed the standard  code requirement for a 10’ wide Type A buffer between adjoining multifamily developments.  Tract  A‐Granada Lakes Villas is subject to a 15’ wide Type B buffer per the Master Plan.  Tract A has at  least 30 feet of landscaped area and open space area along most of eastern boundary, with some  greater degrees of buffering provided by lakes and additional green space.  To the east within the  3.B.j Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))    GMP Consistency Narrative   PL20190000959 – Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI   Page 3  adjoining Plantation PUD, landscaped areas and open space along the roadways of Tara Circle and  Plantation Circle provide additional buffering along the shared boundary.      The adjoining communities are built‐out, and with the existing features of the roadways and open  space along the shared boundary, there is no potential for new incompatibilities to arise because no  residential homesites could be added on either side of the Tract A eastern boundary.      FLUE Policy 5.3   All rezonings must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan. For properties that are zoned  inconsistent with the Future Land Use Designation Description Section but have nonetheless been  determined to be consistent with the Future Land Use Element, as provided for in Policies 5.9 through 5.13,  the following provisions apply:   a.  For such commercially‐zoned properties…    Not applicable.    b.  For such industrially‐zoned properties…     Not applicable.    c.  For such residentially‐zoned properties, zoning changes will be allowed provided the authorized  number of dwelling units in the new zoning district does not exceed that authorized by the existing  zoning district, and provided the overall intensity of development allowed by the new zoning district  does not exceed that allowed by the existing zoning district, except as provided for in the  Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay.     No changes are proposed to the approved type or number of dwelling units, uses, or density.  No  changes are proposed to the layout or arrangement of units per the approved RPUD Master Plan.    d. For property deemed to be consistent with this Element pursuant to one or more of policies 5.9  through 5.13, said property may be combined and developed with other property, whether such  other property is deemed consistent via those same policies or is deemed consistent with the Future  Land Use Designation Description Section. For residential and mixed use developments only, the  accumulated density between these properties may be distributed throughout the project, as  provided for in the Density Rating System or the Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, as applicable.     The  Santa  Barbara  Landings  RPUD (Ordinance  05‐53)  is  consistent  with  the  Future  Land  Use  Designation Description Section and the Density Rating System as approved.  No  changes are  proposed to the approved type or number of dwelling units, uses, or density.  No changes are  proposed to the layout or arrangement of units per the approved RPUD Master Plan.     3.B.j Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))    GMP Consistency Narrative   PL20190000959 – Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI   Page 4      e.  Overall intensity of development shall be determined based upon a comparison of public facility  impacts as allowed by the existing zoning district and the proposed zoning district.     No changes are proposed to the approved type or number of dwelling units, uses, or density.  No  changes are proposed to the layout or arrangement of units per the approved RPUD Master Plan.   The intensity level as approved in Ordinance 05‐53 is not proposed to change.      FLUE Policy 5.6  New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set  forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04‐41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18,  2004, as amended).    The surrounding land uses to the north, east and west are predominately multifamily and single‐family  residential uses.  The CFPUD/RPUD to the south contains three tracts designated for Calusa Park  Elementary  School,  an  Emergency  Management  Services  (EMS)  station  #19,  a  maximum  of  31  residential units calculated at a density of 6 units per acre, and a lake area.      Compatibility of land uses is ensured through the proposed changes.  No changes are proposed to  the approved type or number of dwelling units, uses, or density.  No changes are proposed to the  layout or arrangement of units per the approved RPUD Master Plan.  No changes are proposed to  the RPUD landscape buffer types.  No changes are proposed to the condition for a wall to be  constructed along the Tract B eastern property line at time of Tract B development.      The removal of the condition for a wall along the Tract A eastern property line will not change  compatibility for the existing communities along both sides of the Tract A eastern boundary, which  are compatible multifamily neighborhoods.  Tract A is built out with 248 multifamily units.  Plantation  PUD to the east is a closed‐out PUD and is built‐out with 331 multifamily units.     The existing conditions along both sides of the Tract A eastern boundary line exceed the standard  code requirement for a 10’ wide Type A buffer between adjoining multifamily developments.  Tract  A‐Granada Lakes Villas is subject to a 15’ wide Type B buffer per the Master Plan.  Tract A has at least  30 feet of landscaped area and open space along most of eastern boundary, with some greater  degrees of buffering provided by lakes and additional green space.  To the east within the adjoining  Plantation PUD, landscaped areas and open space along the roadways of Tara Circle and Plantation  Circle provide additional buffering along the shared boundary.      The  adjoining  communities  are  built‐out,  and  with  the  existing features  of  the  roadways  and  buffering along the shared boundary, there is no potential for new incompatibilities to arise because  no residential homesites could be added on either side of the Tract A eastern boundary.  3.B.j Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))    GMP Consistency Narrative   PL20190000959 – Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI   Page 5    FLUE OBJECTIVE 7  Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development  character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows:     FLUE Policy 7.1  The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting  collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection  spacing requirements of the Land Development Code.    No change is proposed to the approved and existing connections with fronting roadways.  Access is  provided by the existing access points where Santa Clara Drive connects with Radio Road and Santa  Barbara Boulevard.  Internal to the RPUD, the RPUD Master Plan depicts that Tract B interconnects  with Tract A via extensions of the internal accessways.      FLUE Policy 7.2   The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion  on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals.     As stated above, internal accesses or loop roads are incorporated in the approved RPUD Master Plan.    Tract B interconnects with Tract A via extensions of the internal accessways.  No change is proposed  to the access system as approved.  Condition 2.14.A.3 of the RPUD is proposed to be modified to  require interconnection of the internal sidewalk concurrent with the road interconnection from Tract  B to Tract A, consistent with LDC Section 6.06.02.B.        FLUE Policy 7.3   All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or  interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type.  The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the  Transportation Element.     As stated above, internal accesses or loop roads are incorporated in the approved RPUD Master Plan.    Tract B interconnects with Tract A via extensions of the internal accessways.  No change is proposed  to the access system as approved.  Condition 2.14.A.3 of the RPUD is proposed to be modified to  require interconnection of the internal sidewalk concurrent with the road interconnection from Tract  B to Tract A, consistent with LDC Section 6.06.02.B.             3.B.j Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))    GMP Consistency Narrative   PL20190000959 – Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI   Page 6  Policy 7.4   The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities,  common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types.  As stated above, Tract B interconnects with Tract A via extensions of the internal accessways.  No  change is proposed to the access system.  The minimum standard for a 6‐foot wide sidewalk is  identified in PUD Section 2.14.A.2.  The interconnection of the internal sidewalks as proposed is  consistent with County standards to provide linkages to serve pedestrian needs between development  areas.  Condition 2.14.A.3 of the RPUD is proposed to be modified to require interconnection of the  internal sidewalk concurrent with the road interconnection from Tract B to Tract A, consistent with  LDC Section 6.06.02.B.        HOUSING ELEMENT  The County seeks to have an adequate supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing for all  residents of Collier County.  A common method for encouraging development of new affordable housing  units in the County is through the incentive of the Bonus Density program, which rewards developers of  housing that serves low, moderate, or workforce income residents with additional density.      Santa Barbara Landings RPUD did not receive bonus density and is not part of the Bonus Density  program.  Four conditions related to housing affordability were adopted at the time of the RPUD  approval (Ordinance 05‐53).  Insubstantial changes are proposed to three of the conditions as  described below.     The first condition 5.11.A requires payment of a $1,000 contribution to Collier County for each unit  within Tract B of the RPUD.  Removal of this contribution commitment qualifies as a minor text  change per LDC Section 10.02.13.E.3.c.  Because the petitioner requests additional proposed changes  to the RPUD, this change is proposed as part of an insubstantial change (PDI) request.      Property Appraiser records and primary residency records are not available to determine whether  50% of the dwelling units within the RPUD sold to primary residents as referenced in Condition 5.11.B.   This condition is proposed to be clarified to reflect that the condition applies to Tract B, the only  developable tract.    Property Appraiser records are provided with this petition indicating the initial sales prices for 151  units within Granada Lakes Villas were less than $240,000.  This satisfies Condition 5.11.C that  requires over 50% of the total allowable 291 dwelling units within the RPUD to sell for less than  $240,000, because 51% of total allowable units have qualified.  Thus, sales price affordability goals  have been met by this project, and it is appropriate to remove Condition 5.11.C.    Employment records and income level records are not available to determine whether purchasers of  10% of the total number of dwelling units within the RPUD have met the employment status and  3.B.j Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))    GMP Consistency Narrative   PL20190000959 – Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PDI   Page 7  income levels referenced in Condition 5.11.D.  This condition is proposed to be clarified to reflect that  the condition applies to Tract B, the only developable tract, and that the target income level is  households earning 140% or less of the County’s median income.  This update to the income level  was identified by Cormac Giblin in reference to current County housing policies.  The proposed  updates maintain the objective to provide new housing options that are affordable to the workforce  within Collier County.   3.B.j Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) NIM DOCUMENTATION  (affidavit of compliance, summary,  sign in sheets)     3.B.j Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2350 Stanford Court ■Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 334-0046 ■ Fax (239) 334-3661 SINCE 1946 January 15, 2020  Dear Property Owner:  Please be advised that a formal application has been submitted to Collier County seeking approval of an  Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) for the following described property:  Tract B of the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD   +6.3 acres located on the east side of Santa Barbara Blvd., approximately one half‐mile south of Radio Road  The petitioner is asking the County to approve proposed insubstantial changes to the Santa Barbara  Landings RPUD zoning approval including: (1) requiring a wall along the eastern boundary of Tract B only;  (2)requiring interconnection of the internal sidewalk at time of road interconnection; (3) clarifying that environmental conditions are applicable to each tract; and (4) adjusting affordable housing conditions by removing a payment to Collier County of $1,000 per unit, clarifying that the primary residence condition applies to Tract B, removing the maximum sales price threshold as this condition has been satisfied, and clarifying that 10% of units within Tract B must be sold to persons employed in Collier County earning 140% or less of the County’s median income. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will  be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of and provide your input on the proposed  Insubstantial Change to a PUD application.    The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Thursday, January 30 at 5:30 p.m. at Collier Area  Transit located at 8300 Radio Road, Naples, FL 34104.    At this meeting the petitioner will make every effort to illustrate the intended activity associated with this  Insubstantial change to a PUD application and to answer any questions.  Should you have questions prior  to the meeting, please contact me.  Sincerely,  Laura DeJohn, AICP  Principal Planner  JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.  Telephone: (239) 334‐0046  Email: ldejohn@johnsoneng.com  3.B.j Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 16A z TUESDAY, JANUARY 14, 2020 z NAPLES DAILY NEWS + AintotheFuture2020Look TITLE SPONSOR PLAT INUM SPONSOR GOLD SPONSOR SILVER SPONSOR RandyThibaut ALC Home Sales/Land DevelopmentExpert Stan Stouder CCIM Commercial Real Estate Expert DennyGrimes ABR, CRS,GRI, MBA,CDPE Residential Real Estate Expert PRESENTERS Tu esday Feb.25,2020 $50 $600 $750tickets RESERVED TA BLES RESERVED TA BLES * STADIUM SEAT S•*Addonopen bar &food from 4:30-5:30 for$45 PREMIUM PLACEMENT TA BLE OF 8 PREMIUM PLACEMENT TA BLE OF 10 4:30- 6:00PM 6:00- 7:30PM Networking Presentations MarketWatchSWFL.com Buy Yo ur Tickets Now NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by St. George Group GRD Corp.represented by Laura DeJohn, AICP of Jo hnson Engineering, Inc. on: Thursday,Ja nuary 30, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. at Collier Area Transit 8300 Radio Rd, Naples, FL 34104 Subject Property:Tr act B of the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD is approximately +6.3 acres located on the east side of Santa Barbara Blvd.,approx imately one half- mile south of Radio Ro ad, in Section 04,To wnship 50 South,Ra nge 26 East, Collier County, Florida. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20190000959 – St. George Group GRD Corp.requests an InsubstantialChangetoaPUD(PDI)toclarifytheconditions applicabletothe Tr act B development site by eliminating outdated requirements and modifying to clarify applicability of the conditions to Tr act B.Changes proposed include: (1)requiring a wall al ong the eastern boundary of Tr act B only; (2)requiring interconnection of the internal sidewalk at time of road interconnection; (3) clarifying that environmental conditions are applicable to each tract; and (4) adjusting affordable housing conditions by removing a payment to Collier County of $1,000 per unit, clarifying that the primary residence condition applies to Tr act B,removing the maximum sales price threshold as this condition has been satisfied, and clarifying that 10% of units within Tr act B must be sold to persons employed in Collier County earning 140% or less of the County’s median income. WE VA LU E YO UR INPUT Business owners, property owners,residents, and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owner and Collier County staff. If yo u are unable to attend this meeting,but have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail by March 2, 2020 to: Laura DeJohn, AICP Jo hnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford County Naples, Florida 34112 Phone: (239) 334-0046 ldejohn@johnsoneng.com Lava and ash spewed from the Taal volcano in the Philippines Monday as thousands of residents fled the region along roads choked by cars amid omi- nous darkness, thunder and lightning. The Philippine Institute of Volcanol- ogy and Seismology warned that a “hazardous explosive eruption” was possible within hours to days. President Rodrigo Duterte ordered families in nearby communities to move to safer ground, a process made difficult by poor visibility and, for many, a lack of transportation. Hun- dreds of thousands of people may ulti- mately flee the region, officials said. “Taal Volcano entered a period of in- tense unrest,” the volcano institute said in a statement. Philippine Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana warned that the “worst- case scenario” for Taal would resemble the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo, 90 miles to the north, that killed 800 peo- ple and rendered 200,000 homeless. “Remember Pinatubo – the entire mountain collapsed during the erup- tion,” Lorenzana said. “That’s what we are fearing, that the eruption would cause the entire island to rise and scat- ter debris on the nearby areas.” Taal started spewing ash, steam and even smaller rocks nearly 10 miles into the air Sunday. The debris forced the airport in Manila, 65 miles away, to shut down for several hours. More than 500 flights were canceled, and authorities warned that the airport could again be closed if conditions worsen. Tracy Gregg, an associate professor of geology at the University at Buffalo, said that nearby Lake Taal is actually a volcanic crater formed from at least four “cataclysmic” eruptions more than 500,000 years ago. Taal Island, essen- tially the volcano, was formed from subsequent, smaller eruptions. “The truth is that we have no good precedent for how such a large volcano gears up into a cataclysmic eruption,” Gregg told USA TODAY. “We know that such eruptions occur ... but we don’t know what specific advance signs such a gigantic eruption would give us be- cause we’ve never witnessed one.” She said that could be what Taal is revving up for, but added it could sim- ply be venting some extra pressure. Contributing: The Associated Press Residents watch Taal volcano spew ash from a look out in Talisay, Batangas province, southern Philippines on Monday.GERRARD CARREON/AP 30,000 flee eruptionof Philippine volcano John Bacon USA TODAY 3.B.j Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.j Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))   Page 1  Santa Barbara Landings RPUD  PUD Insubstantial Change PDI‐PL20190000959   Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary    Date:  Thursday, January 30, 2020    Time:  5:30 pm    Location: Collier Area Transit, 8300 Radio Rd, Naples, FL 34104  Attendees: Laura DeJohn and Amanda Martin of Johnson Engineering, Inc.  Ray Bellows, Collier County   See attached sign‐in sheets for public attendees.     Meeting Summary:  The meeting started at approximately 5:30 p.m.  Attendees were documented on  sign‐in sheets, attached.     Laura DeJohn introduced herself and Ray Bellows, the Collier County Zoning Manager, and noted that the  meeting was being recorded.  She explained the County requirement for a Neighborhood Informational  Meeting (NIM) for the PUD Insubstantial Change application.     She gave background on the location of the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD and the 2005 RPUD approval.   Two exhibits were displayed: an aerial with the PUD and tract boundaries, and the PUD Master Concept  Plan.  The ±41.6‐acre RPUD is comprised of two development tracts:  one is now a condominium  community known as Granada Lakes Villas, and the second Tract B is +6.3 acres approved for a maximum  of 43 multifamily dwelling units.  Tract B remains undeveloped.     She explained the applicant has the property for sale, and interested developers have identified zoning  conditions that make the project infeasible.  The Insubstantial Change request is intended to address these  four conditions:  (1) adjust the requirement for a wall along the entire eastern PUD boundary to be only  along the eastern boundary of Tract B;  (2) adjust the requirement for an internal sidewalk from Tract B  to the Granada Lakes Clubhouse and pool to be only a sidewalk interconnect at time of road  interconnection;  (3) clarify that environmental conditions are applicable to each tract; and (4) adjust  affordable housing conditions by removing a payment to Collier County of $1,000 per unit, remove the  $240,000 maximum sales price for half of all units because this condition has been satisfied, and clarify  that the 10% of units for people employed in Collier County earning 140% or less of the County’s median  income applies to Tract B only, which is 4 or 5 units.   Questions and comments from attendees included:    What will the buildings look like and how tall will they be?   Reply: The PUD stipulates a maximum of 4 units per structure, and a maximum of 2 stories, 30 feet.   Frank Cooper of Granada Lakes Owners Association described that the existing condos were built in  1987 and apartments, which converted to condos in 2005.  The applicant originally sought increased  density in 2005 and was granted the additional 43 units on Tract B, which was originally a preserve  area.  There have been various lawsuits between the HOA and owner.        Where is the road connection?   Reply:  The driveway for Tract B connects to Santa Clara Drive. There is no connection to Plantation  and no new connection to Radio Road.  3.B.j Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))   Page 2   Concerns about drainage  Reply:  Engineering drawings that address drainage are completed at the time of development. The  capacity of the stormwater system, water quality levels and flow rates are subject to review and  approval by the County and South Florida Water Management District.     Are you trying to rezone the property to make it easier to develop?  Reply:  The owner is requesting relief from some, not all, of the commitments in the PUD.     Will Tract B have their own amenities?  Reply:  Yes, Tract B will have its own amenities.     The Granada Lakes Villas dumpsters attract buzzards and are unsightly. Can the wall extend to block  view from the northernmost Plantation single family home to the dumpster area?  Reply:  Conditions of the dumpster area is a Granada Lakes HOA management issue.  Development of  Tract B will change the dumpster location from a dead‐end condition to a driveway connection point,  and the increase in use and visibility of that area.       Who approves these requested changes?  Reply:  Comments from this NIM are documented, and the application moves through the County  staff review process.  Staff makes recommendations to the Hearing Examiner (or Planning Commission  if the Hearing Examiner is not seated) at a public hearing, where the decision is made on the  application.       Can you clarify the affordable housing changes, specifically the removal of the $1,000 per unit  contribution?  Reply:  Mr. Bellows explained that contributions to the County’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund have  been rolled back because the Trust Fund was never functional.  Developers who did contribute have  been refunded their payments.  The County has an administrative process for removing the $1,000  per unit contribution commitment.  Because other changes are being requested, this change is  incorporated in the PDI request.       Who owns Tract B?  Reply:  A corporate entity owns Tract B and the entity is owned by Armando Bucelo.     Is Habitat for Humanity a potential buyer?  Has Tract B been sold?   Reply:  Tract B is for sale and anyone can purchase it.  It has not been sold.      Concern about concentrating low income, poor people in the area.  Reply:  The condition for 10% of units to house people employed in Collier County earning 140% or  less of the County’s median income equates to 4 or 5 units on Tract B.  This income level is roughly in  the range of $80,000.       The meeting concluded at approximately 6:30.          3.B.j Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.jPacket Pg. 221Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara 3.B.jPacket Pg. 222Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara     TRAFFIC MEMO    3.B.j Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 2350 Stanford Court  Naples, FL 34112 (239) 434-0333  Fax (239) 334-3661 9/53. June 11, 2019 Mr. Michael Sawyer Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Department Transportation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, FL 34104 Re: Santa Barbara Landings RPUD PL20190000959 - Insubstantial Change (PDI) Dear Mr. Sawyer: There is no proposed change to the number of dwelling units, uses or access. The maximum units allowed will remain 248 units on Tract A (existing Granada Lakes Villas) and a maximum of 43 mixed residential dwelling units on Tract B for a total of 291 dwelling units. No change is proposed to development parameters; therefore, this request does not result in any increase in traffic generation or changes in traffic circulation. If you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. Joshua Hildebrand, P.E., PTOE Transportation Project Manager JJH:jlc:20192056-000 SINCE 1946 3.B.j Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Attachment I - Application-Backup Materials (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) Laura DeJohn 3.B.k Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Attachment J - Hearing Property Sign (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI)) 3.B.k Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Attachment J - Hearing Property Sign (13383 : PL20190000959 Santa Barbara Landings (PDI))