Loading...
Backup Documents 10/15/2020 COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION BACKUP DOCUMENTS OCTOBER 15, 2020 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., OCTOBER 15, 2020, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, THIRD FLOOR, 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA: AS PART OF AN ONGOING INITIATIVE TO PROMOTE SOCIAL DISTANCING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENTS REMOTELY, AS WELL AS IN PERSON, DURING THIS PROCEEDING. INDIVIDUALS WHO WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY, SHOULD REGISTER AT http://bit.ly/Octl5CCPCSpeakerRegistration ANY TIME AFTER THE AGENDA IS POSTED ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE WHICH IS 6 DAYS BEFORE THE MEETING OR THROUGH THE LINK PROVIDED ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE COUNTY WEBSITE AT www.colliercountyfl.gov. INDIVIDUALS WHO REGISTER WILL RECEIVE AN EMAIL IN ADVANCE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING DETAILING HOW THEY CAN PARTICIPATE REMOTELY IN THIS MEETING. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING, PLEASE CALL THOMAS CLARKE AT (239) 252-2526 OR EMAIL TO: thomas.clarkeACollierCountyFL.gov. NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6. BCC REPORT-RECAPS 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 8. CONSENT AGENDA 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ADVERTISED: Page 1 of 3 1. ***Note: This item was continued from the October 1,2020 CCPC meeting to the October 15,2020 CCPC meeting.*** PL20190000696 GMPA —Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Subdistrict - Amending Ordinance no. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the future land use element and future land use map and map series by amending the urban mixed use district,residential subdistrict to add the Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Subdistrict to allow construction of up to 172 multi- family dwelling units and/or hotel rooms/suites, but no less than 40 residential units, and 10,000 square feet of C-3, commercial intermediate commercial uses, and a marina and a ship store. The subject property is located at the northeast corner Of the intersection of Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road in section 32,township 48 south,range 25 east,consisting of 5.42 acres; and furthermore, recommending transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida department of economic opportunity; providing for severability and providing for an effective date. (Companion Item PL20190000697)[Coordinator: Corby Schmidt,Principal Planner] 2. ***Note: This item was continued from the October 1, 2020('CPC meeting to the October 15,2020 CCPC meeting.*** PL20190000697 PUDZ -An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41,as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Commercial Intermediate district (C-3) zoning district to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as One Naples MPUD, to allow construction of up to 172 multi-family dwelling units and/or hotel rooms/suites,but no less than 40 residential units, up to 208 feet in height including a parking deck, and 10,000 square feet of C-3, commercial intermediate commercial uses, and a marina and a ship store. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road in Section 32. Township 48 South, Range 25 East, consisting of 5.42 ± acres; and by providing an effective date. (Companion Item PL20190000696) [Coordinator: James Sabo, Principal Planner] 3. ***Note: This item to be heard at 3:00 pm***PL20200001297 AUIR-A Resolution Relating to The Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Ordinance 89-05, as amended,providing for the annual update to the schedule of Capital Improvement Projects,within the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan based on the 2020 Annual Update And Inventory Report on Public Facilities(AUIR),and including updates to the 5- year schedule of Capital Projects contained within the Capital Improvement Element(for Fiscal Years 2021 -2025)and the Schedule of Capital Projects contained within The Capital Improvement Element for the future 5-year period (for Fiscal Years 2026 - 2030), providing for severability, and providing for an effective date. [Coordinator:Corby Schmidt. Principal Planner] 4. ***Note: This item is continued to the November 5, 2020 CCPC meeting.*** PL20180002233 GMPA-A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan.Ordinance 89-05,as amended, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element and Map Series to create the NC Square Mixed-Use Overlay on land in the Agricultural/Rural designation and Rural Fringe Mixed Use District-Receiving Lands Overlay to allow up to 44,400 square feet of commercial uses,a 12,000 square foot daycare limited to 250 students, and a maximum of 129 residential dwelling units and furthermore providing for transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property is 24.4 acres and located at the northwest corner of Immokalee Road and Catawba Street approximately 1.6 miles west of Wilson Boulevard in Section 29,Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator:Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] 5. ***Note: This item is continued to the November 5, 2020 CCPC meeting.*** PL20190002305- MPUD (PUDR) Sabal Bay- Fleischmann Parcel An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County. Florida amending Ordinance No. 05-59, as amended, the Sabal Bay Mixed Use Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 102.49± acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A), Rural Agricultural with a Special Treatment overlay (A-ST), Residential Single Family-Three (RSF-3) and Residential Single Family-Three with a Special Treatment Page 2 of 3 overlay (RSF-3-ST) to the Saba! Bay Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD); by amending the PUD document and master plan to add 102.4%acres designated as Tract R9 for residential development; to add 230 dwelling units for a total of 2,229 dwelling units in the MPUD; to revise the master plan and conceptual water management plan; and to add a master site plan for the R9 Tract. The subject property is located south of Thomasson Drive, south and west of U. S. 41, north and west of the Wentworth PUD. and east of the Naples Bay Intercoastal Waterway in Sections 23, 24, 25. 26 and 36, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, and Section 19, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 2,518.98+/- acres; and providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Ray Bellow,Planning Manager] B. NOTICED: 10. NEW BUSINESS 11. OLD BUSINESS 12. PUBLIC COMMENT 13. ADJOURN CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows/di Page 3 of 3 Ann P. Jennejohn From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 9:47 AM To: Ann P.Jennejohn; ClarkeThomas; BradleyNancy Cc: FrantzJeremy; bellows_r Subject: RE: Urgent* 4387898 PL20200001297 Attachments: Ad Request.docx; Signed Ad Request 9.23.2020.pdf Importance: High Please see revised request for this ad proof. OK to place in classified.Thank you kindly. Respectfully, exautdna eta coua Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov colliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning. COLL Ier Count y Exceeding Expectations From:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 23, 2020 7:53 AM To: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov>; ClarkeThomas <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>; BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW:4387898 PL20200001297 EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. This ad (PL2O2.000O1297) has been cancelled, 1'll wait for resubmission. Thavtk you. i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public meeting will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission on Thursday, October 15, 2020 commencing at 9:00 a.m., in the Collier County government Center, 3rd floor BCC Chamber, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL The purpose of this hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS,WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, BASED ONTHE2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORTON PUBLIC FACILITIES (AU1R),AND INCLUDINGUPDATES TO THE 5-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2021 — 2025) AND THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONTAINED WITHIN CONTAINED WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT FOR THE FUTURE 5-YEAR PERIOD (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026 — 2030), AND TO SECTIONS RELATING TO THE PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND WORK PROGRAM, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [CPSP-2020-1] All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to October 15, 2020, will be read and considered at the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountvfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@CollierCountyFL.gov. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Edwin Fryer, Chairman Collier County Planning Commission NDN Acct #323630 September 23, 2020 Attn: Legals Naples News Media 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 Re: PL20200001297 Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice, in the classified section of the newspaper, on Friday, September 25, 2020, and send the Affidavit of Publication, together with charges involved, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ann Jennej ohn, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500200458 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public meeting will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission on Thursday, October 15, 2020 commencing at 9:00 a.m., in the Collier County Government Center, 3rd floor BCC Chamber, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL. The purpose of this hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, BASED ONTHE2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORTON PUBLIC FACILITIES (AUIR),AND INCLUDINGUPDATES TO THE 5-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2021 — 2025) AND THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT FOR THE FUTURE 5-YEAR PERIOD (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026 — 2030), AND TO SECTIONS RELATING TO THE PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND WORK PROGRAM, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [CPSP-2020-1] All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section.Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to October 15, 2020, will be read and considered at the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountvfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@CollierCountvFL.gov. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Edwin Fryer, Chairman Collier County Planning Commission Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 10:07 AM To: Naples Daily News Legals Subject: PL20200001297 Attachments: PL20200001297.doc; PL20200001297.docx Good Morning, Please advertise the attached on Friday, September 25, 2020. Thank you. Ann Jennejohn 13MR Senior Deputy Clerk it,,,T col,„„ Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Office: 239-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Ann.Jennejohn@CollierClerk.cowt • -Q Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court r#�4'rro *�` � Sr Cowtptroller of Collier County 3299 Tavvtiawu Trail, Suite *401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com i Ann P. Jennejohn From: Gannett Legals Public Notices <GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 11:50 AM To: Ann P. Jennejohn Subject: RE:4390376 - PL20200001297 Attachments: OrderConf.pdf External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello, Your notice is scheduled to run on 9/25 in the Daily News. The total cost is$483.00, which includes an affidavit. A proof of the notice is attached. Thank you, Forrest Grade Public Notice Representative SNE;TO Y I LOCALIQ Office:844-254-5287 From:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 9:07 AM To: NDN-Legals<legals@naplesnews.com> Subject:4390376- PL20200001297 Good Morning, Please advertise the attached on Friday, September 25, 2020. Thank you. Ann Jennejohn 13MR Senior Deputy Clerk ` vxT(Yk.,,, Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board 4(��j Office: 239-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Ann.Jennejohn@CollierClerk.com rr'ted Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tavvtiavv►i Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 1 4 ai;AapirE 3IaiLij6 PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK BCC COMPREHENSIVE PL 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E 700 NAPLES FL 34112- Account AD# Net Amount Tax Amount Total Amount Payment Method Payment Amount Amount Due 1303804 0004390376 $483.00 $0.00 $483.00 Invoice $0.00 $483.00 Sales Rep: FGrade Order Taker: FGrade Order Created 09/23/2020 Product #Ins Column Agate Lines Start Date End Date NDN-Naples Daily News 1 1.00 138 09/25/2020 09/25/2020 NDN-naplesnews.com 1 1.00 138 09/25/2020 09/25/2020 *ALL TRANSACTIONS CONSIDERED PAID IN FULL UPON CLEARANCE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTION Text of Ad: 09/23/2020 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public meeting will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission on Thursday, Oc- tober 15,2020 commencing at 9:00 a.m., in the Collier Coun- ty Government Center, 3rd floor BCC Chamber, 3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples,FL. The purpose of this hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDI- NANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, WITHIN THE CAPI- TAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, BASED ON THE 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVEN- TORY REPORT ON PUBLIC FA- CILITIES (AUIR), AND INCLUD- ING UPDATES TO THE 5-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IM- PROVEMENT PROJECTS CON- TAINED WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2021 - 2025) AND THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONTAINED WITH- IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVE- MENT ELEMENT FOR THE FU- TURE 5-YEAR PERIOD (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026 - 2030), AND TO SECTIONS RELATING TO THE PUBLIC SCHOOL FA- CILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVE- MENT PLAN AND WORK PRO- GRAM, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVID- ING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [CPSP-2020-1] All interested parties are invit- ed to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESO- LUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehen- sive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, be- tween the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401 Na- ples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any ques- tions pertaining to the docu- ments should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Sec- tion. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to October 15, 2020, will be read and consid- ered at the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Com- mission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verba- tim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. As part of an ongoing initia- tive to promote social distancing during the COVID- 19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to pro- vide public comments remote- ly, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals wnu wuulu IIKe w pelf uupdLe remotely, should register any time after the agenda is post- ed on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link pro- vided on the front page of the County website at WWw•c olliercountyfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meet- ing, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@Col I ierCountyFL.gov. If you are a person with a dis- ability who needs any accom- modation in order to partici- pate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain as- sistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Man- agement Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. As- sisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are availa- ble in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Edwin Fryer,Chairman Collier County Planning Com- mission Pub Date:September 25,2020 4390376 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 11:54 AM To: CasanovaAlexandra; ClarkeThomas; BradleyNancy; RodriguezWanda Cc: FrantzJeremy; SchmidtCorby Subject: FW: 4390376 - PL20200001297 Attachments: OrderConf.pdf Please review for placement Friday, September 25, 2020. Thank you. Ann Jenne,jotin 13MR Sevtior Deputy Clerk ,vAT tut sir,� Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board �.��` ` ,f Office: 239-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) J '; Avtvt..ievtvtejohvt@CollierClerk.cowt • Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tawtiav'ni Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL. 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com From: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 11:50 AM To: Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE:4390376 - PL20200001297 External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello, Your notice is scheduled to run on 9/25 in the Daily News. The total cost is$483.00, which includes an affidavit. A proof of the notice is attached. Thank you, Forrest Grade Public Notice Representative USA TO LOCiLIQ Office:844-254-5287 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 12:36 PM To: Minutes and Records Cc: SchmidtCorby; FrantzJeremy; bellows_r; ClarkeThomas; GundlachNancy; RodriguezWanda Subject: FW: Final ad approval - AUIR 4390376 - PL20200001297 Attachments: OrderConf.pdf Importance: High County Attorney, planner has approved. Ready for final approval for processing. Thank you kindly. Respectfully, tilex440144 ea4awocia Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples,FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.Iv/CollierZoning. Cotr County Exceeding Expectations From:SchmidtCorby<Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 12:29 PM To:CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE:4390376- PL20200001297 Its OK with me. But I'm working with Heidi CAO to get their version in order. Corby Schmidt,AICP Principal Pldrmer 239.252.2944 Corby.5chmid tC'colliercoun tyfl gov From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountvfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 12:00 PM To:SchmidtCorby<Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: 4390376- PL20200001297 For your prompt review and approval the revised AUIR ad proof is attached.This is running tomorrow so prompt attention is needed.Thank you Corby. Respectfully, 1 ,41exaicdna e ,adraua Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples,FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountvfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at httr://bit.ly/CollierZoning. Coder County Exceeding Expectations From:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennelohn@collierclerk.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 11:54 AM To: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountvfl.gov>; ClarkeThomas <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>; BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradlev@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountvfl.gov> Cc: FrantzJeremy<Jeremy.Frantz@colliercountvfl.gov>; SchmidtCorby<Corbv.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW:4390376- PL20200001297 zNAL 'L This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please review for placewtevtt Friday, September 25, 2020. mavtk you. Ann JennejoAn 13MR Sevtior Deputy Clerk ` vaTttH.kr Clerk to the Value Adjustwtevtt Board �' r. 75 6)� �'• Office: 239-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Office of tine Clerk of the Circuit Court rye ''`Cxr+.`+ & Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tawtiawt Trail, Suite *401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.cowt From: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 11:50 AM To:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE:4390376 - PL20200001297 External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. 2 Ann P. Jennejohn From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 12:36 PM To: Minutes and Records Cc: SchmidtCorby; FrantzJeremy; bellows_r; ClarkeThomas; GundlachNancy; RodriguezWanda Subject: FW: Final ad approval - AUIR 4390376 - PL20200001297 Attachments: OrderConf.pdf Importance: High County Attorney, planner has approved. Ready for final approval for processing.Thank you kindly. Respectfully, 14teuutobta eaQauwua Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at htti://bit.ly/CollierZoning. • Cot County Exceeding Expectations From: SchmidtCorby<Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Wednesday, September 23, 2020 12:29 PM To:CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE:4390376- PL20200001297 Its OK with me. But I'm working with Heidi CAO to get their version in order. Corby Schmidt,AICP Princi0 Planner 239.252.2944 Corby.Schmid tecolliercoun tyf1.go v From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@ colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Wednesday, September 23, 2020 12:00 PM To:SchmidtCorby<Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW:4390376- PL20200001297 For your prompt review and approval the revised AUIR ad proof is attached.This is running tomorrow so prompt attention is needed.Thank you Corby. Respectfully, 1 ,4Qexaaebta ezaugut4 Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples,FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.Iv/CollierZoning. Cl ter County Exceeding Expectations From: Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jenneiohn@collierclerk.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 11:54 AM To: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov>; ClarkeThomas <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>; BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: FrantzJeremy<Jeremy.Frantz@colliercountyfl.gov>; SchmidtCorby<Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: 4390376- PL20200001297 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please review for placewtevtt Friday, September 2.5, 2020. Thank you. Ann Jenne,john 13MR Sevtior Deputy Clerk ` taT�rhkra Clerk to the Value Adjustvvtevtt Board�++i Office: 239-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) 5 Ati.K.Jemnejokin@CollierClerk.com r' 4k � ' Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller of Collier Couvtty 3299 Tawtiavvu Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.cowt From: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 11:50 AM To: Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jenneiohn@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE: 4390376- PL20200001297 External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. 2 Ann P. Jennejohn From: BradleyNancy <Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 4:07 PM To: Ann P. Jennejohn Cc: ashton_h; RodriguezWanda; CasanovaAlexandra; ClarkeThomas Subject: FW: AUIR Ad Proof for Approval/FW: 4390376 - PL20200001297 Attachments: OrderConf.pdf Ann,below as discussed. Nancy Bradley Legal Assistant/Paralegal Collier County Attorney's Office 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301 Naples,FL 34104 Telephone: (239)252-8549 From:AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 2:49 PM To: BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: AUIR Ad Proof for Approval/FW: 4390376- PL20200001297 Nancy, The entire title has errors and does not match my resolution. The title should read: A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN BASED ON THE 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT ON PUBLIC FACILITIES (AUIR), AND INCLUDING UPDATES TO THE 5-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT(FOR FISCAL YEARS 2021—2025) AND THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT FOR THE FUTURE 5-YEAR PERIOD (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026—2030), PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20200001297] Thank you! Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-8773 From:CrotteauKathynell<Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 1:46 PM 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 4:16 PM To: 'Gannett Legals Public Notices' Subject: RE: 4390376 - PL20200001297 Please change the title (in CAPS) to reflect the followivtg language: A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN BASED ON THE 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT ON PUBLIC FACILITIES (AUIR), AND INCLUDING UPDATES TO THE 5-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT(FOR FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025) AND THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT FOR THE FUTURE 5-YEAR PERIOD (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030), PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20200001297] Sorry for the incovtvevtievtce! Ann Jennejohn 13MR Senior Deputy Clerk tt..,T<<,,,� Clerk to the Value Adjustwtevtt 13oard Office: 23 g-252-8406 Fax: 23q-252-8408 (if applicable) Ar.K.Jevun.ejokr.@CollierClerk.com '' Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court ifkteM1�•AA1ip' & Comptroller of Collier County 32q Tawuavvti Trail, Suite #401. Naples, FL- 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com From: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 11:50 AM To:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE:4390376- PL20200001297 External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello, Ann P. Jennejohn From: GWM-Erin GWM-Oettinger <eoettinger@gannett.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 4:24 PM To: Ann P. Jennejohn Subject: Your AdOrder Attachments: OrderConf.pdf External Message: Please use caution when opening attackwtents, clickivtg links, or replying to this message. 43903 76 UPDATED 1 114:1A ill apIrE1 3IaiL cWS PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK BCC COMPREHENSIVE PL 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E 700 NAPLES FL 34112- Account AD# Net Amount Tax Amount Total Amount Payment Method Payment Amount Amount Due 1303804 0004390376 $465.50 $0.00 $465.50 Invoice $0.00 $465.50 Sales Rep: FGrade Order Taker: FGrade Order Created 09/23/2020 Product #Ins Column Agate Lines Start Date End Date NDN-Naples Daily News 1 1.00 133 09/25/2020 09/25/2020 NDN-naplesnews.com 1 1.00 133 09/25/2020 09/25/2020 *ALL TRANSACTIONS CONSIDERED PAID IN FULL UPON CLEARANCE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTION Text of Ad: 09/23/2020 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public meeting will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission on Thursday, Oc- tober 15,2020 commencing at 9:00 a.m., in the Collier Coun- ty Government Center, 3rd floor BCC Chamber, 3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples,FL. The purpose of this hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGE- MENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89- 05, AS AMENDED, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, WITHIN THE CAPITAL IM- PROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN BASED ON THE 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVEN- TORY REPORT ON PUBLIC FA- CILITIES (AUIR), AND INCLUD- ING UPDATES TO THE 5-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL PROJ- ECTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELE- MENT (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2021 -2025) AND THE SCHED- ULE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CAP- ITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT FOR THE FUTURE 5-YEAR PE- RIOD (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026 - 2030), PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVID- ING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL202000012971 All interested parties are invit- ed to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESO- LUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehen- sive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, be- tween the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401 Na- ples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any ques- tions pertaining to the docu- ments should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Sec- tion. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to October 15, 2020, will be read and consid- ered at the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Com- mission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verba- tim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. As part of an ongoing initia- tive to promote social distancing during the COVID- 19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to pro- vide public comments remote- ly, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is post- ed on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting tnrougn the nfK pro- vided on the front page of the County website at www.c of I iercou ntyf l.yov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meet- ing, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@Col lierCountyFL.gov. If you are a person with a dis- ability who needs any accom- modation in order to partici- pate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain as- sistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Man- agement Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. As- sisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are availa- ble in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Edwin Fryer,Chairman Collier County Planning Com- mission Pub Date:September 25,2020 4390376 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 4:28 PM To: CasanovaAlexandra; ClarkeThomas Cc: BradleyNancy; RodriguezWanda Subject: Revised PL20200001297 (AUIR) Attachments: OrderConf.pdf Revised AUIR PL2020000129 7 Please review for publication. Ann Jennejohn 13MR Senior Deputy Clerk Clerk to the Value Adjustment r3oard Office: 239-252.-84OG Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Ann.Jennejohn@CollierClerk.com Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller of Collier County 32q Tamiami Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com Original Message From: GWM-Erin GWM-Oettivtger <eoettinger@gavtvtett.com> Sevtt: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 4:24 PM To: Ann P. Jevtvtejolnvt <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Subject: Your AdOrder External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Ann P. Jennejohn From: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 4:44 PM To: BradleyNancy;Ann P.Jennejohn Cc: RodriguezWanda; CasanovaAlexandra; ClarkeThomas; CrotteauKathynell Subject: RE:AUIR Ad Proof for Approval/FW:4390376 - PL20200001297 incorrect Attachments: AUIR title for CCPC -ad proof incorrect.pdf The ad proof is incorrect. The yellow highlight on the attachment is extra text. Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-8773 From: BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 4:07 PM To:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Cc:AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov>; ClarkeThomas<Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW:AUIR Ad Proof for Approval/FW: 4390376- PL20200001297 Ann,below as discussed. Nancy Bradley Legal Assistant/Paralegal Collier County Attorney's Office 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Suite 301 Naples,FL 34104 Telephone:(239)252-8549 From:AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountvfl.gov> Sent:Wednesday, September 23, 2020 2:49 PM To: BradleyNancy<Nancv.Bradlev@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountvfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: AUIR Ad Proof for Approval/FW: 4390376- PL20200001297 Nancy, The entire title has errors and does not match my resolution. The title should read: A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS,WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH 1 Text of Ad: 09/23/2020 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public meeting will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission on Thursday, Oc- tober 15, 2020 commencing at 9:00 a.m., in the Collier Coun- ty Government Center, 3rd floor BCC Chamber, 3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples,FL. The purpose of this hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDI- NANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, WITHIN THE CAPI- TAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, BASED ON THE 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVEN- TORY REPORT ON PUBLIC FA- CILITIES (AUIR), AND INCLUD- ING UPDATES TO THE 5-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IM- PROVEMENT PROJECTS CON- TAINED WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2021 - 2025) AND THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONTAINED WITH- IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVE- MENT ELEMENT FOR THE FU- TURE 5-YEAR PERIOD (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026 - 2030), AND TO SECTIONS RELATING TO THE PUBLIC SCHOOL FA- CILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVE- MENT PLAN AND WORK PRO- GRAM, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVID- ING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [CPSP-2020-11 All interested parties are invit- ed to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESO- LUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehen- sive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, be- tween the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401 Na- ples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any ques- tions pertaining to the docu- ments should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Sec- tion. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to October 15, 2020, will be read and consid- ered at the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Com- mission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verba- tim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. As part of an ongoing initia- tive to promote social distancing during the COVID- 19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to pro- vide public comments remote- ly, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals WIIU VVUUIU IIRe Lt/ licit U I dle remotely, should register any time after the agenda is post- ed on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link pro- vided on the front page of the County website at www.c olliercountyfl.goy. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meet- ing, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@Col lierCountyFL.gov. If you are a person with a dis- ability who needs any accom- modation in order to partici- pate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain as- sistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Man- agement Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. As- sisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are availa- ble in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Edwin Fryer,Chairman Collier County Planning Com- mission Pub Date:September 25,2020 4390376 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 4:52 PM To: 'GWM-Erin GWM-Oettinger' Subject: RE:Your AdOrder Attachments: AUIR title for CCPC -ad proof incorrect.pdf Hi Erivt, Please remove the text highlighted ivt yellow in the ad. Thavtk you. Ann Jennejohn 13MR Senior Deputy Clerk Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Office: 239-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Ann.Jennejohn@CollierClerk.com Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tavv iawii Trail, Suite 4401 Naples, FL 34112-532.4 www.CollierClerk.com Original Message Frovvt: GWM-Erin GWM-Oettivtger <eoettivtger@gavwtett.cowt> Sevtt: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 4:24 PM To: Aunt P. Jennejohn <Avtvt.Jevtvtejohvt@co(lierclerk.cowt> Subject: Your AdOrder External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replyivtg to this message. 4390376 UPDATED i Ann P. Jennejohn From: Gannett Legals Public Notices <GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 5:02 PM To: Ann P. Jennejohn Subject: RE:4390376 - RE:Your AdOrder Attachments: OrderConf.pdf External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments,clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello, The text has been removed. An updated proof is attached. Thank you, Forrest Grade Public Notice Representative al UsE ORK L+DCA�.IQ Office:844-254-5287 From:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 23, 2020 3:52 PM To:Oettinger, Erin<EOettinger@localiq.com> Subject:4390376- RE: Your AdOrder Hi Erin, Please remove the text highlighted in yellow in the ad. Thank you. Ann Jennejohn BMR Senior Deputy Clerk Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Office: 239-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Ann.Jennejohn@CollierClerk.com Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court &Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tamiami Trail, Suite#401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com Original Message From: GWM-Erin GWM-Oettinger<eoettinger@gannett.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 4:24 PM To:Ann P.Jennejohn<Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Subject:Your AdOrder 1 „,„, ,. apirs 3attgNcw PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK BCC COMPREHENSIVE PL 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E 700 NAPLES FL 34112- Account AD# Net Amount Tax Amount Total Amount Payment Method Payment Amount Amount Due 1303804 0004390376 $465.50 $0.00 $465.50 Invoice $0.00 $465.50 Sales Rep: FGrade Order Taker: FGrade Order Created 09/23/2020 Product #Ins Column Agate Lines Start Date End Date NDN-Naples Daily News 1 1.00 133 09/25/2020 09/25/2020 NDN-naplesnews.com 1 1.00 133 09/25/2020 09/25/2020 *ALL TRANSACTIONS CONSIDERED PAID IN FULL UPON CLEARANCE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTION Text of Ad: 09/23/2020 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public meeting will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission on Thursday, Oc- tober 15,2020 commencing at 9:00 a.m., in the Collier Coun- ty Government Center, 3rd floor BCC Chamber, 3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples,FL. The purpose of this hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGE- MENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89- 05, AS AMENDED, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, WITHIN THE CAPITAL IM- PROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN BASED ON THE 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVEN- TORY REPORT ON PUBLIC FA- CILITIES (AUIR), AND INCLUD- ING UPDATES TO THE 5-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL PROJ- ECTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELE- MENT (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2021 -2025) AND THE SCHED- ULE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CAP- ITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT FOR THE FUTURE 5-YEAR PE- RIOD (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026 - 2030), PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVID- ING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20200001297] All interested parties are invit- ed to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESO- LUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehen- sive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, be- tween the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401 Na- ples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any ques- tions pertaining to the docu- ments should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Sec- tion. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to October 15, 2020, will be read and consid- ered at the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Com- mission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verba- tim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. As part of an ongoing initia- tive to promote social distancing during the COVID- 19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to pro- vide public comments remote- ly, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is post- ed on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting tnrougn the lam pro- vided on the front page of the County website at www.c olliercountyfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meet- ing, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@Col lierCountyFL.gov. If you are a person with a dis- ability who needs any accom- modation in order to partici- pate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain as- sistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Man- agement Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. As- sisted listening devices forg the hearing impaired are availa- ble in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Edwin Fryer,Chairman Collier County Planning Com- mission Pub Date:September 25,2020 4390376 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 8:13 AM To: BradleyNancy; RodriguezWanda Cc: CasanovaAlexandra; ClarkeThomas Subject: FW:4390376 - RE: Your AdOrder Attachments: OrderConf.pdf Revised proof attached. Thavtk you Ann Jennejohn J3MR Sevtior Deputy Clerk tay tot kr Clerk to the Value Adjustwtevtt Board 4' r Office: z39-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Atili..JetruetejolAvt@CollierClerk.com Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court ,„�t;.�` & Comptroller of Collier Couvtty 3299 Tawuawu Trail, Suite #4O1 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com From: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 23, 2020 5:02 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE: 4390376 - RE: Your AdOrder External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello, The text has been removed. An updated proof is attached. Thank you, Forrest Grade Public Notice Representative 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 8:18 AM To: SchmidtCorby; bellows_r; FrantzJeremy Cc: ClarkeThomas; Minutes and Records;Ann P.Jennejohn Subject: URGENT approval needed ** FW:4390376 - RE:Your AdOrder Attachments: OrderConf.pdf Importance: High Good Morning Corby Ray and Jeremy, This is the revised AUIR ad proof needing approval as quickly as you are able to send to me. Tom, I will be in HEX this morning, should you receive approval please forward to minutes and Copy Heidi, Wanda and Nancy Bradley at County Attorney's office for their approval.This is very urgent;this ad runs tomorrow.Thank you. Respectfully, litezaftAa e44440442 Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.Iv/CollierZoning. Cotter County Exceeding Expectations From:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Sent:Thursday,September 24, 2020 8:13 AM To: BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov>; ClarkeThomas <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW:4390376- RE: Your AdOrder EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Revised proof attacked. Thank you i Ann P. Jennejohn From: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 9:28 AM To: BradleyNancy; CasanovaAlexandra; Minutes and Records Subject: FW:AUIR Corrected Ad Proof for Approval/FW:4390376 - RE:Your AdOrder Attachments: OrderConf.pdf Approved. Thank you! Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-8773 From: CrotteauKathynell<Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Thursday, September 24, 2020 9:26 AM To:AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc:AshkarSally<Sally.Ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov>; PerryDerek<Derek.Perry@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: AUIR Corrected Ad Proof for Approval/FW: 4390376- RE: Your AdOrder Heidi: The ad proof is correct per the 9-24-20 TO Resolution title. xatlay Crotteau, Legal-Secretary Office of the Coller County Attorney Phone: (239)252-6052 From:AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountvfl.gov> Sent:Thursday,September 24, 2020 8:57 AM To:CrotteauKathynell<Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountvfl.gov> Subject: FW:AUIR Corrected Ad Proof for Approval/FW:4390376- RE:Your AdOrder Kathy, Does the title match our resolution? Thank you! Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-8773 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 9:30 AM To: 'Gannett Legals Public Notices' Subject: RE:4390376 - RE: Your AdOrder Approved for publication!! Ann Jennejohn i3MR Senior Deputy Clerk ,.tiT(milt Clerk to the Value Adjustwtevtt Hoard �`�ti. `�•,r Office: 239-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Ann.Jevtv,ejohr@CollierClerk.cow Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court ' '<Kn, ' & Comptroller of Collier County 32e? Tavv iavv'i Trail, Suite #4O1 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com From: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 5:02 PM To:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE: 4390376- RE: Your AdOrder External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments,clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello, The text has been removed. An updated proof is attached. Thank you, Forrest Grade Public Notice Representative OoriNttr LO # I$ Office:844-254-5287 1 16D I FRIDAY. SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 I NAPLES DAILY NEWS i,Public Notices NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public meeting will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission on Thursday, Oc- tober 15, 2020 commencing at 9:00 a.m., in the Collier Coun• ty Government Center, 3rd r part of an ongoing initia floor BCC Chamber, 3299 Live to promote social Tamiami Trail East,Naples,FL. distancing during the COVID- The purpose of this hearing is 19 pandemic, the public will to consider: have the opportunity to pro- A RESOLUTION RELATING TO vide public comments remote THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ly, as well as in person, during ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER this proceeding. Individuals COUNTY GROWTH MANAGE- ' who would like to participate MENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89- remotely, should register any 05, AS AMENDED, PROVIDING time after the agenda is post- I FOR THE ANNUAL UPDATE TO ed on the County website ' THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL which is 6 days before the IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, meeting through the link pro WITHIN THE CAPITAL IM- vided on the front page of PROVEMENT ELEMENT OF the County website at www.c THE COLLIER COUNTY olliercountyfl.gov. Individuals GROWTH MANAGEMENT who register will receive an PLAN BASED ON THE 2020 email in advance of the public ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVEN- hearing detailing how they TORY REPORT ON PUBLIC FA- can participate remotely in I CILITIES (AUIR), AND INCLUD- this meeting. For additional ING UPDATES TO THE 5 YEAR information about the meet- SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL PROJ- ing, please call Thomas Clarke ECTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE at (239) 252-2526 or email to CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELE- CCPCRemoteParticipationeCol MENT (FOR FISCAL YEARS lierCountyFL.gov. 2021 -2025) AND THE SCHED- It you are a person with a dis- ULE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS ability who needs any accom- CONTAINED WITHIN THE CAP- modation in order to partici- ITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT pate in this proceeding, you FOR THE FUTURE 5-YEAR PE- are entitled, at no cost to you, RIOD (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026 to the provision of certain as- - 2030), PROVIDING FOR sistance. Please contact the SEVERABILITY, AND PROVID- Collier County Fatalities Man- ING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. agement Division, located at [PL20200001297] 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite All interested parties are invit- 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356. ed to appear and be heard. (239) 252-8380, at least two Copies of the proposed RESO- days prior to the meeting. AB- LUTION will be made available sisted listening devices for the for inspection at the GMD hearing impaired are availa- Zoning Division, Comprehen- ble in the Board of County sive Planning Section, 2800 N. Commissioners Office Horseshoe Dr., Naples, be- Edwin Fryer,Chairman tween the hours of 8:00 A.M. ! Collier County Planning Corn- and 5:00 P.M., Monday i mission through Friday. Furthermore, Pub Date:September 25,2020 the materials will be made 14390376 available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401 Na- ples. one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any ques- tions pertaining to the docu- ments should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Sec- tion. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to October 15, 2020, will be read and consid- ered at the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Com- mission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verba- tim record of the proceedings Is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence i upon which the appeal is based. es Oailij PART OF THE USA i ODAY NET WORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 BCC COMPREHENSIVE PL ANNING DEV 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E 700 NAPLES, FL 34112 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared said legal clerk who on oath says that he/she serves as Legal Clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Published: 09/25/2020 i Subscribed and sworn to before on September 25,2020: Notary,State of WI,County of Brown I 'TARA MONDLOCI-I Notary Public i_ State of Wisconsin My commission expires August 6,2021 Publication Cost:$465.50 Ad No:0004390376 Customer No: 1303804 PO#: public mtg on 10/15 #of Affidavits) This is not an invoice NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice s hereby given that a public rnechug will be hell by the Collier County Planning Commission on Thursday, Oc- tober 15,2020 commencing at 9:00 a.m„ In the Collier Conn ty Government Center, 3rd fioot BCC Chamber, 3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples,FL. The purpose of this hearing is to consider. A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGE- MENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89- 05,AS AMENDED, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, WITHIN THE CAPITAL IM- PROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN BASED ON THE 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVEN- TORY REPORT ON PUBLIC FA- CILITIES (AUIR), AND INCLUD- ING UPDATES TO THE 5-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL PROJ- ECTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELE- MENT (FOR FISCAL YEARS 2021 -2025)AND THE SCHED- ULE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CAP- ITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT FOR THE FUTURE 5-YEAR PE- RIOD(FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026 - 2030), PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVID- ING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PU02000012971 All interested parties are invit- ed to appear and he heard. Copies of the proposed RESO- LUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehen- sive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr„ Naples, be- tween the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office. fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamlami Trail, suite 401 Na- ples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any ques- tions peitaming to the docu ments should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Sec- tion. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to October 15, 2020,will be read and consid- ered at the public hearing!, Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Com. mission will need a record of the proceedings uertamnxJ thereto and therefore. [nay need to ensure that a verbs tim record of the protr;ed[nys Is made.which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. As part of an ongoing antra- trve to promote social distancing during the COVID- 19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to pro• vide public comments reroute ly,as well as[n person,during this proceeding Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is post- ed on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link pro• vided on the front page at the County v:etssite at www c olliercountytl.gov Individuals whn ronictor will rxmivo an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can Nm ticipale i emulely in this meeting. For additional information about the meet- ing. please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemotePartic spat ionf'Col IierCountyFt.gov,_ If you are a person with a dis- ability who needs any accom• modation in order to partici- pate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain as- sistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Man- agement Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239} 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. As- sisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are availa- ble in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Edwin Fryer,Chairman Collier County Planning Corn- mission Pub Date:September 25,2020 4390376 Ann P. Jennejohn From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 11:16 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: GundlachNancy; RodriguezWanda; SchmidtCorby; ClarkeThomas; bellows_r Subject: 10/15 CCPC Ad Request for - PL20180002233 NC Square (GMPT) Attachments: 2 x 3 Ad Map.pdf; Ad Request.rtf; Signed Ad Request.pdf Importance: High Good afternoon, Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience. Thank you in advance, ,Qexa tdlla eamtac a Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples,FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Note: Email Address Has Changed Alexandra.casanova@colliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning. Cfgr County Exceeding Expectations Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 October 15, 2020 CCPC Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on Friday September 25, 2020 and furnish proof of publication to Marcia Kendall, GMD Department, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The advertisement must be a "1/4"(3x10.32 in) page ad, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DEPARTMENT: GROWTH MANAGEMENT Zoning Division [Comprehensive Planning Section] FUND & COST CENTER: 111-138317.649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500200458 ACCOUNT NUMBER: 323630 Authoriz Designee Signature PL20180002233/CP2019-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on October 15, 2020 commencing at 9:00 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners chamber, third floor, County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP SERIES TO CREATE THE NC SQUARE MIXED- USE OVERLAY ON LAND IN THE AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION AND RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT-RECEIVING LANDS OVERLAY TO ALLOW UP TO 44,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES, A 12,000 SQUARE FOOT DAYCARE LIMITED TO 250 STUDENTS, AND A MAXIMUM OF 129 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 24.4± ACRES AND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF IMMOKALEE ROAD AND CATAWBA STREET APPROXIMATELY 1.6 MILES WEST OF WILSON BOULEVARD IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. IPL201800022331 [INSERT MAP] All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples. between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to September 25, 2020, will be read and considered at the public hearing. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountvfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation(c�CollierCountyFL.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Edwin Fryer, Chairman Collier County Planning Commission r � o � o, CD 0 CD CD 70 Wilson BLVD N Acct #323630 September 14, 2020 Attn: Legals Naples News Media Group 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, Florida 34110 Re: PL20180002233 (Display Ad WJMAP) Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Friday, September 25, 2020 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, together with charges involved, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ann Jennej ohn, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500200458 Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on Friday September 25, 2020 and furnish proof of publication to the Minutes & Records Department, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #401, Naples, FL, 34112. The advertisement must be a "1/4" (3x10.32 in) page ad, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DEPARTMENT: GROWTH MANAGEMENT Zoning Division [Comprehensive Planning Section] FUND & COST CENTER: 111-138317-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500200458 ACCOUNT NUMBER: 323630 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on October 15,2020 commencing at 9:00 A.M.in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber, Third Floor, County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP SERIES TO CREATE THE NC SQUARE MIXED-USE OVERLAY ON LAND IN THE AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION AND RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT-RECEIVING LANDS OVERLAY TO ALLOW UP TO 44,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES, A 12,000 SQUARE FOOT DAYCARE LIMITED TO 250 STUDENTS, AND A MAXIMUM OF 129 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 24.4± ACRES AND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF IMMOKALEE ROAD AND CATAWBA STREET APPROXIMATELY 1.6 MILES WEST OF WILSON BOULEVARD IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20180002233] [INSERT MAP] All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr.,Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to September 25,2020, will be read and considered at the public hearing. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely,as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting,please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@CollierCountyFL.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Edwin Fryer, Chairman Collier County Planning Commission r � o 0 a 6_. CD `4 3 0 CD c� 70 Wilson BLVD N Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P. Jennejohn Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 12:19 PM To: Naples Daily News Legals Subject: PL20180002233 (Display Ad W/MAP) Attachments: PL20180002233 (CCPC 10-15-20).doc; PL20180002233.docx; PL20180002233.pdf Please advertise the attached (w/MAP) ova Friday, September 25. 2020. Thavtk you! Ann Jenne,jotin 13MR Sevtior Deputy Clerk oTitk,„? Clerk to the Value Adjustwtevtt Board 4` 4`+� Office: 239-2s2-s406 tit Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Ano..Jevunejohn@CollierClerk.com r`*, � .�7 Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court ''',"t it- t``` & Comptroller of Collier Couvtty 3299 Tamiami Trail, Suite #4O1 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.cowt Ann P. Jenne.ohn From: BradleyNancy <Nanc Bradle Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 11:08 AM untyfl.gov> To: Minutes and Records;Ann P.Jennejohn Cc CasanovaAlexandra; SchmidtCorby; ClarkeThomas; CrotteauKathynell; RodriguezWanda; BradleyNancy g Wanda; Subject: Ad Proof Revisions/NC Square (GMPT)/10-15-20 CCPC Hrng Attachments: FW: 10/15 CCPC Ad Request for- PL20180002233 NC Square (GMPT) Hi Ann,please see highlighted change below to attached ad request. Please request theproof be accordingly. revised Thank you. Nancy Bradley Legal Assistant/Paralegal Collier County Attorney's Office 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Suite 301 Naples,FL 34104 Telephone:(239)252-8549 From:AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 9:50 AM To:CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov>; SchmidtCorby <Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell ynell Cc:ClarkeThomas<Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>; BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl. ov> Subject: RE: 10/15 Review and approval of title for NC Square (GMPT) g Yes, it is acceptable. Thank you! Kathy, Please make the change to our title and resolution. Thank you! Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34104 (239)252-8773 From:CasanovaAlexandra<Alexandra.Casanova colliercount fl. ov> Sent:Tuesday,September 15, 2020 9:43 AM To:SchmidtCorby<Corbv.5chmidt colliercount fl eov>;AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton colliercount fl. ov>• RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodri uezCc�colliercount vfl.eov> Cc:ClarkeThomas<Thomas.ClarkeCn�colliercount yfl.eov> I 1 Subject: FW: 10/15 Review and approval of title for NC Square (GMPT) Importance: High Good morning everyone, The agent made a revision request to title for your review and approval: PL20180002233 NC Square GMPT A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element and Map Series to create the NC Square Mixed-Use Overlay on land in the Agricultural/Rural designation and Rural Fringe Mixed Use District-Receiving Lands Overlay to allow up to 44,000 44,400 square feet of commercial uses, a 12,000 square foot daycare limited to 250 students, and a maximum of 129 residential dwelling units and furthermore directing transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property is 24.4±acres and located at the southwest corner of lmmokalee Road and Catawba Street approximately 1.6 miles west of Wilson Boulevard in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20180002233] Please advise COA, if this is acceptable to make revision in advertising request.Thank you all ! Respectfully, ,4 ezeutd4 L 644441444, Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples,FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning. Co ier County Exceeding Expectations From: ClarkeThomas<Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 5:23 PM To: SchmidtCorby<Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc:CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov>; FrantzJeremy<Jeremy.Frantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: 10/15 Review and approval of title for NC Square (GMPT) Importance: High Corby, The Agent made some changes to the title below. Please review and let us know if you have anything further to add, or do you approve these changes? Thanks Tom 74.60,44 elaidec Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2526 2 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:18 PM To: 'Dailey, Benjamin' Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs 1 Fri 9/25 Attachments: ND-GC10493591-01.PDF Ovt the 6t" row down please change the number 44, 000 to 44,400 Thank you. Ann ✓ennejotin r3MR Sevtior Deputy Clerk tm:R, Clerk to the Value AdjustmentBoard . ,� Office: 239-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Avwt.Jerwtejohvt@CollierClerk.cow r rx.,, � �' Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court k""�t''t & Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tamiawti Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL. 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.covv From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 11:53 AM To:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Cc: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Subject: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs Fri 9/25 External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello Ann, I hope this email finds you well! I have attached the proofs for your scheduled Legal Display ad runs on Fri 9/25, please see the run info below- Ad#GC10493586 (PL20190002305) 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:53 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Cc: Gannett Legals Public Notices Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs ! Fri 9/25 Attachments: ND-GC10493591-01.PDF External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello Ann, I'm more than happy to help! The new version of Ad#GC10493591 (PL20180002233) is attached for your review. Thank you, Ben Dailey Team Lead I Client Success, SMB •NUSETWORKA Y LOCALIQ Office: (317)444-5032 I bdailey@localiq.com From:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:30 PM To: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 Thank you for all your help! Q Ann Jenne,jolMn 13MR Sevtior Deputy Clerk trtT x eak Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Office: 239-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Ann.JentAejohpl@CollierCierk.com rcti, ,k-�' Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court y1?""-'•`•.° & Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tavvtiavvti Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.cowt i Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:59 PM To: CasanovaAlexandra; BradleyNancy Cc: ClarkeThomas; GundlachNancy; RodriguezWanda Subject: Revised PL20180002233 (NC Square) Attachments: ND-GC10493591-01.PDF Please review the attached (revised) vtotice, that will run September 2.5 Thavtk you! Ann Jennejohn 13MR Senior Deputy Clerk t,.tr�Yk.kr Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board h.` '• Office: 2.39-252-840G 5 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Avtvt.Jevw ejohvt@CollierClerk.cowt re.x, £ Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court '.(ei.xn 01 & Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tavvtiawu Trail, Suite #4O1 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:53 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Cc: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links,or replying to this message. Hello Ann, I'm more than happy to help! The new version of Ad#GCI0493591 (PL20180002233) is attached for your review. Thank you, i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on October 15, 2020 commencing at 9:00 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber,Third Floor,County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP SERIES TO CREATE THE NC SQUARE MIXED-USE OVERLAY ON LAND IN THE AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION AND RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT-RECEIVING LANDS OVERLAY TO ALLOW UP TO 44,400 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES,A 12,000 SQUARE FOOT DAYCARE LIMITED TO 250 STUDENTS,AND A MAXIMUM OF 129 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 24.4± ACRES AND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF IMMOKALEE ROAD AND CATAWBA STREET APPROXIMATELY 1.6 MILES WEST OF WILSON BOULEVARD IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. [PL201800022331 All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore,the materials will be made Immokalee RD Z1 0 J to C Project Location §' available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section.Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to September 25, 2020, will be read and considered at the public hearing. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@CollierCountyFL.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101,Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Edwin Fryer, Chairman ND-GC10493591-01 Ann P. Jennejohn From: RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 2:14 PM To: Minutes and Records Cc: BradleyNancy; CasanovaAlexandra; ClarkeThomas; SchmidtCorby Subject: correction needed: Revised PL20180002233 (NC Square)- CCPC Attachments: ND-GC10493591-01.PDF Ann, Nancy B. is out today, and I'm not sure if anyone got back to you on this one, but the map is misplaced. Please ask NDN to put the ad in the normal spot, right after the resolution title, and send us another proof. Thank you, Wanda Rodriguez, MCP, CPM Office of the County Attorney (239) 252-8400 From:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:59 PM To: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov>; BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: ClarkeThomas<Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>; GundlachNancy<Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Revised PL20180002233 (NC Square) EXTERNAL EMAIL This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please review the attacked (revised) notice, that wilt run September 25 Thank you! Ann Jenne,jotin r3MR Senior Deputy Clerk t2k;k Clerk to tke Value Adjustwtent r3oard 1111101: Office: 239-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court �kt,K,ri•' & Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tawtiawti Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 2:31 PM To: 'Dailey, Benjamin' Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 One more change: The vv.ap is in the wrong place. It needs to go right under the wtaivt title, right wilder (PL2O1 8 000223 3) Thavtk you. Ann JenneJo/Tn 13MR Sevtior Deputy Clerk ` t'.iT lYk:/rj, Clerk to the Value Adjustwtevtt Hoard �` Office: 239-252-840ro Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Avui...JenvIejoko.@CollierClerk.com r #��r Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court x�" Sr Comptroller of Collier County 32qq Tawtiavvti Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.Colliernerk.com From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:19 PM To:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Cc: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Subject: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25- PL20180002233 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 3:53 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Cc: Gannett Legals Public Notices Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 Attachments: ND-GC10493591-01 (1).pdf External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello Ann, I have attached the updated proof for ad#GCI0493591, please let me know any other needed updates/corrections or if this can be approved. Thank you, Ben Dailey Team Lead I Client Success, SMB •NSETWORKY ( LOCALIQ Office: (317)444-5032 I bdailey@localiq.com From:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 2:31 PM To: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25- PL20180002233 One more change: The wrap is in the wrong place. It needs to go right under the main title, right under: (PL20180002233) Thank you. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on October 15, 2020 commencing at 9:00 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber,Third Floor,County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP SERIES TO CREATE THE NC SQUARE MIXED-USE OVERLAY ON LAND IN THE AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION AND RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT-RECEIVING LANDS OVERLAY TO ALLOW UP TO 44,400 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES,A 12,000 SQUARE FOOT DAYCARE LIMITED TO 250 STUDENTS,AND A MAXIMUM OF 129 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 24.4± ACRES AND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF IMMOKALEE ROAD AND CATAWBA STREET APPROXIMATELY 1.6 MILES WEST OF WILSON BOULEVARD IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. [PL20180002233] okalee R Z� Imm Do J m C Project Location §' All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section.Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to September 25, 2020, will be read and considered at the public hearing. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@CollierCountyFL.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Edwin Fryer, Chairman ND-GC10493591-01 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P. Jennejohn Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 4:03 PM To: CasanovaAlexandra; ClarkeThomas Cc: RodriguezWanda; BradleyNancy; SchmidtCorby Subject: Revised Proof NC Square (CCPC 10-15-20) Attachments: ND-GC10493591-01 (1).pdf Please review the attached for publicatiovt September 25, 2020. Thavtk you. Ann Jennejohn 13MR Sevtior Deputy Clerk `o.t9.T(-mkt Clerk to the Value Adjustwtevtt 13oard 4'. Office: 239-252-8406 - Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Aii.K.JevunejoGivt@CollierClerk.com • Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court hpctK. r.•• ' & Cowtptroller of Collier Couvtty 32gq Tawtiawti Trail, Suite *401 Naples, FL. 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 3:53 PM To:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Cc: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25- PL20180002233 External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello Ann, 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: BradleyNancy <Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 7:54 AM To: Minutes and Records;Ann P.Jennejohn Cc: CasanovaAlexandra; ClarkeThomas; SchmidtCorby; RodriguezWanda; BradleyNancy Subject: Atty Approved Revised Proof NC Square GMPA (CCPC 10-15-20) Attachments: ND-GC10493591-01 (1).pdf Please see attorney approval below of attached proof. Nancy Bradley Legal Assistant/Paralegal Collier County Attorney's Office 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Suite 301 Naples,FL 34104 Telephone:(239)252-8549 From:AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 4:12 PM To: RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Revised Proof NC Square GMPA(CCPC 10-15-20) Wanda, Approved. Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-8773 From:Ann P.Jennejohn<Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 4:03 PM To: CasanovaAlexandra<Alexandra.CasanovaCu@colliercountyfl.gov>; ClarkeThomas <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov>; SchmidtCorby<Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Revised Proof NC Square (CCPC 10-15-20) EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please review the attached for i publication September 25, 2020. Thank you. Ann JenneJohn 13MR Senior Deputy Clerk {Yh,Nl�r Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Office: 2.39-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Avtvt.Jevtvtjjohvt@CollierClerk.cowt r't, Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tavvtiaw►i Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailev@localiq.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 3:53 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jenneiohn@collierclerk.com> Cc: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments,clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello Ann, I have attached the updated proof for ad#GC10493591, please let me know any other needed updates/corrections or if this can be approved. Thank you, Ben Dailey Team Lead i Client Success, SMB /� ONSETWORKY , LOCALIQ Office: (317)444-5032 I bdailey(c�localiq.com 2 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 10:17 AM To: 'Dailey, Benjamin' Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 Approved for publicatiovt Ann Jennejohn f3MR Senior Deputy Clerk 4stt..,Ttft,.kr Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board �,•w .,� Office: 239-z52-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Avtvt.Jevtvtejohvt@CollierClerk.cowt ` 1*. Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tavvtia& i Trail, Suite #4O1 Naples, FL. 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 3:53 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Cc: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello Ann, I have attached the updated proof for ad#GC10493591, please let me know any other needed updates/corrections or if this can be approved. Thank you, Ben Dailey Team Lead I Client Success, SMB i NETWO KY LOCALI Office: (317)444-5032 I bdailey@localiq.com From:Ann P.Jennejohn<Ann.Jennelohn@collierclerk.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 2:31 PM To: Dailey, Benjamin<bdailey@localiq.com> Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 Ovte more change: 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 1:10 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Cc: ClarkeThomas Subject: RE: Revised PL20180002233 (NC Square) Attachments: N D-GC10493591-01.PDF Ann, This proof was approved, however after the approval it was discovered by agent that in the first paragraph after the map the 9/25/2020 date should really reflect a date of 10/15/2020 can you let me know if this can be changed prior to its run date this Friday? Thank you. Respectfully, exauuGia euagooa Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Alexandra.CasanovaPcolliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning. Coer County Exceeding Expectations Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 1:44 PM To: 'Dailey, Benjamin' Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 Hi Ben, 13ig request. There's a date referenced in this notice that's wrong. The first paragraph, under the vvnap, a date of September 25th is referenced. That date should be October 15, 2020 Is there a any way to change that date? It is set for publication this Friday (September 25) Ann Jennejohn I3MR Senior Deputy Clerk TRTtYk!gr Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board K` Q`�•,� Office: z39-2s2-84o6 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Ann.Jennejohn@Coll ierCl erk.co vn et? Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller of Collier County 32q Tavniavv►i Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 3411z-5324 www.CollierClerk.covn From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 3:53 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jenneiohn@collierclerk.com> Cc: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello Ann, 1 From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailev@localiq.com> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 2:14 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jenneiohn@collierclerk.com> Cc: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25- PL20180002233 External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hi Ann, That's not an issue at all; I've got the correction submitted for ad#GC10493591 and I'll send you the updated version for review when I can. Thank you, Ben Dailey Team Lead I Client Success, SMB USA SNETWORKY L�CALI Office: (317)444-5032 I bdailevAlocalia.com From:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jenneiohn@collierclerk.com> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 1:44 PM To: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailev@localiq.com> Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 Hi l3evt, Big request. There's a date referevtced ivt this vtotice that's wrovtg. The first paragraph, wader the wrap, a date of September 25th is referevtced. That date should be October 15, 2020 Is there a avty way to chavtge that date? It is set For publicatiovt this Friday (September 25) 2 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 2:45 PM To: Ann P. Jennejohn Cc: Gannett Legals Public Notices Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 Attachments: N D-GC10493591-01.PDF External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello Ann, The updated version of ad#GC10493591 is attached; please let me know if you see anything else that needs adjusted or if I can go ahead and re-approve this for us. Thank you, Ben Dailey Team Lead I Client Success, SMB SUSATODAY i A I N ETWO K IQ Office: (317)444-5032 I bdailey@localiq.com From:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 2:15 PM To: Dailey, Benjamin<bdailey@localiq.com> Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 Thank you! Ann Jennejohn 13MR Senior Deputy Clerk c ,.t,t�Hkr Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board 4`'% Office: 239-252-840G Fax: 23q-252-8408 (if applicable) Am.Jennejohn@CollierClerk.com Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court rYl4,'�`'x � & Cowtptroller of Collier County 32gq Tavtniawi Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.cowt NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on October 15, 2020 commencing at 9:00 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber,Third Floor,County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples,FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP SERIES TO CREATE THE NC SQUARE MIXED-USE OVERLAY ON LAND IN THE AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION AND RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT-RECEIVING LANDS OVERLAY TO ALLOW UP TO 44,400 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES,A 12,000 SQUARE FOOT DAYCARE LIMITED TO 250 STUDENTS,AND A MAXIMUM OF 129 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 24.4± ACRES AND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF IMMOKALEE ROAD AND CATAWBA STREET APPROXIMATELY 1.6 MILES WEST OF WILSON BOULEVARD IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. [PL20180002233] mokaleeZ� Im RD CO Project Location 7i 1 All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M.,Monday through Friday. Furthermore,the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section.Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to October 15,2020,will be read and considered at the public hearing. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@CollierCountyFL.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Edwin Fryer,Chairman ND-GCI0493591-01 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P. Jennejohn Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 2:51 PM To: CasanovaAlexandra Subject: NC Square- PL20180002233 Attachments: N D-GC10493591-01.PDF Hi again, 1'wt ovtl y sending this to you, as not to confuse everybody. They changed that date on this ovte frovv► that September 25 date, to October 15, 2020. May 1 provide approval again, since it had already been given the approval? Thavtk you Alex Ann Jennejohn 13MR Sevtior Deputy Clerk tRttuk!gT Clerk to the Value Adjustvvtevtt Board Office: 23 9-252-8406 Fax: 239-2s2-8408 (if applicable) Avtvt.Jevtvtejohvt@CollierClerk.com 14 cos, Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court 4(firml".t`' & Comptroller of Collier Couvtty 3299 Tawtiawu Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.cow From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 2:45 PM To:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jenneiohn@collierclerk.com> Cc: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25- PL20180002233 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 3:05 PM To: Ann P. Jennejohn Subject: RE: NC Square- PL20180002233 Attachments: N D-GC10493591-01.PDF I am providing approval of this ad, in addition to the previous approvals from County Staff and applicant. Please run ad, as is.Thank you kindly. Respectfully, ;41exaadita ea4eutotia Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples,FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Alexandra.Casanova(a@colliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning. Co i r County Exceeding Expectations From:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 2:51 PM To: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: NC Square- PL20180002233 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi again, I'm only sending this to you, as vtot to confuse everybody. They changed that date on this one from that September 2.5 date, to October 15, .020. May I provide approval again, since it had already been given the approval? Thank you Alex Ann P. Jennejohn To: Dailey, Benjamin Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 Approved for publication. Thank you For making that one final change. Ann Jennejohn 3MR Senior Deputy Clerk ` ,nt<rk Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board R�4 ��., � Office: 239-252-840(0 z Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Ann-Jenne joktn@Coll ierCl erk.com 't 4 Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court """N^o` & Cowtptroller of Collier County 3299 Tawtiawti Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.Coll ierC(erk.coon From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 2:45 PM To:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Cc: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello Ann, The updated version of ad#GC10493591 is attached; please let me know if you see anything else that needs adjusted or if I can go ahead and re-approve this for us. Thank you, Ben Dailey Team Lead I Client Success, SMB USA NETWORK LOCAL) Office: (317)444-5032 I bdailey c(Dlocaliq.com From:Ann P.Jennejohn<Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 2:15 PM To: Dailey, Benjamin<bdailey@localiq.com> Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 10:39 AM To: 'Dailey, Benjamin' Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 Approved for publication. Yes thank you for making those changes. Ann Jenne,jolin 13MR Senior Deputy Clerk ` t;1T cot," Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Office: 239-25z-84o6 A. Fax: z39-252-8408 (if applicable) Avwt.Jevtvte jokivt.@CollierClerk.com ft!, Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller of Collier County 3z99 Tawtiaw►i Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 34112-S324 www.CollierClerk.com From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 2:45 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Cc:Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20180002233 External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello Ann, The updated version of ad#GC10493591 is attached; please let me know if you see anything else that needs adjusted or if I can go ahead and re-approve this for us. Thank you, Ben Dailey 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on October 15, 2020 commencing at 9:00 A.M. in the Hoard of Count Commissioners Chamber,Third Floor,Coll nn ( .,oernment Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples.FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP SERIES TO CREATE THE NC SQUARE MIXED-USE OVERLAY ON LAND IN THE AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION AND RURAL FRINGE N MIXED USE DISTRICT RECEIVING LANDS OVERLAY TO ALLOW UP TO 44,400 io • SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES,A 12,000 SQUARE FOOT DAYCARE LIMITED TO 250 STUDENTS,AND A MAXIMUM OF 129 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 24.4i ACRES AND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF IMMOKALEE ROAD AND CATAWBA STREET APPROXIMATELY 1.6 MILES WEST OF WILSON BOULEVARD IN { SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. (PL201800022331 m ca m Xi N ram+ N 0 N O lmmok Z alee RD o �� J COto a Project { Location All interested parties are invited to appear and he heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples. between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M.,Monday through Friday. Furthermore,the materials will be made .available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office. Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East "Tamiami Trail. Suite 40l Naples. one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division,Comprehensive Planning Section.Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to October 15,2020,will be read and considered at the public hearing. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVJD-19 pandemic. the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person. during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is pasted on the County website which is h days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at wwvv.collirrcountyfl,gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at 1239) 252-2526 or email to .t:PC,JtenloteParticipationteCollierCountyFL,trut. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. if you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you.to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division. located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East.Suite 101,Naples,Fl. 34112-5356,(239)252.8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of Counts Contntissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Edwin Fryer.Chairman `. aptrizi PART OE THE USA TODAY NETWORK Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 BCC ZONING DEPT 3299 TAMIAMI TRL STE 401 NAPLES,FL 34112 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier County,Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples,in said Collier County, Florida,and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida,each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida ,for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 9/2 512 0 2 0 Subscribed and sworn to before on September 25th,2020: Oa ay-N.(AA pc- Notary,State of WI,County of Brown j+ TAFiA MONDLOCH {yt} Notary Public t State of Wisconsin My commission expires: August 6,2021 Publication Cost:S1,040.26 Ad No GC10493591 Customer No:323534 PO#: I11-138317-649100-00000/4500200458 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on October 15, 2020 commencing; at 9:00 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber,Third Floor,County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples,FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED,SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP SERIES TO CREATE THE NC SQUARE MIXED-USE OVERLAY ON LAND IN THE AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION AND RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT-RECEIVING LANDS OVERLAY TO ALLOW UP TO 44,400 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES,A 12,000 SQUARE FOOT DAYCARE LIMITED TO 250 STUDENTS,AND A MAXIMUM OF 129 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 24.4± ACRES AND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF IMMOKALEE ROAD AND CATAWBA STREET APPROXIMATELY 1.6 MILES WEST OF WILSON BOULEVARD IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. [PL20180002233] jmm21T) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M.,Monday through Friday. Furthermore,the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should he directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section.Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to October 15,2020,will be read and considered at the public hearing. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.culliercountvfl uov Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CcPClton terart.ir_i4tati„i_e0�II' rtc (:r�ti�u FL.g!ov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Tatniami Trail East,Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Edwin Fryer,Chairman ND.GC1019J591.01 2A I r2IDA1 SCPTCM3L125 2023 I NAPLES DAILY NEWS START PEOPLE ill THE NEWS t:`e JACKPOT TRIPLE PLAY ,,1 Florida Lottery Dolly Parton shares that doting elf slid can rut several She .A�' e.....r.......,..._.....:• she has'tasteful'tat toes has bet tone oneol the wwkl's most In- _le,kilt irnmoe demand models,and he was the list In 4 4.4121,i ON Ilia lads'1141 p FLORIDA LOTTO •sitcom trolly Paton 1x all tatted u well. 'male One Ohecton In cultism out as a w Iletpeel l.ra-r e lailrl oily,aleast 'min Arlin ea Pu ..main,.la.i,'.:.`.1 ilil sM,Dun I do lung sums•I..uu.N Mai s Igoe: .a i.-^es•••. s1 . t i lie count rl musit woo lukl PEOPLE,in Actor Reynolds baking t-s••'.-11••er 11~ew ALL FANTASY S r�'1 v'sr aO on ankle ponied Weduemlut Rut to Invest In Wdsh soccer club .. , tow WA.10•ml mRreM sees_—a•:L..aas.M thr1 re tasteful 1 la no a anal rill' POW[RfJ1ll M s ors rss 1 ii She raid she 1ms'liblaonxand lows Hollywood alum Ryan Reynolds and �ws ID r.s»l)ni311.ter sect lsnan and hunrdlies along with a beehive Rob MrElhenney mold he making an seesarsa.,ra.r.n. s.maee•ss.wn SI.n PICK 2,3,4,S 11101 em•ns a scar unlikely loran Into the soccer business i -•••Mt SI N'th••a•'t'w st a I'n sin w LNeereet awl PO MOM. but coldhui btuld upon her lull ell Wrexham,a Wash team that plays ( 1 ``w as r IMPS .a .5.. ink 10 xnnwlhine into,.vlslblr•? In the fifth Ilex of English sweet,re- ! •. 1°e1 are a•me s 'MO knows,I Italy yet some more sealed WcihlestYy that Reynolds and sin +1 ran s1 rA•m ti 3.•... wlaneawr M' vemin a .. .. later,-eke nakl'I mu>hurt lure to get McElltenney are the"two extremely M[OA WILL1ONS CASIMLIFEr coveted with tattoos just so everybody well-known indiniduub"the clnh hasjj Ml q rould be tight' plea lowly said are interested In invest- as 52S.:in)f.dr,'Sl:l.saa;t.raw. lonc.ean, 4..11---weld-w Scul Pamun recently announced a n 525millinn el Si 11 roll l014,Wa,l,a onom nAr sal ditto.Ay u.wl1w lie sa•t •g •el S:ISfo(WI WNW'MOO is S•ta iia0 MI n el ton e11 Christmas album,nM t0 release Or;2 Heynnbls is A CanMkan-hem actor lash 2•Me001M61 S4C0 1,401671)aa sirs best known for starring In the"Dead- liras.M u. we 41u011 eLI a s•n:nunaa ss.P sea 'Grateful':Olga Hedid welcomes pod-musics MnEII,enlley,a(fiend of a•a Wee WWI {WI baby girl with 2eyn Malik Reynolds,la an American actor and di- metal who wag the creator of Tv show armlet Sigh I todid and her musicinn "Its Abrupt Sunny In Pldlldelpllie" ten friend Says Slulik took to social Wiexhwm hal been u fan-owned na•es sm..,nun.'.•ut1d hovra•>•n•w at,eels media to celebrate the strive!0l on he club since 2011 rant gill,wllh dud saying he's"grateful' and"thankful• Raspy-volced French `ro tryput into words how l sus feel- singer Greco din at 93 jug right now would he an initosnible task The lose I feel for this tiny human Juliette Green,a French singe',ac- ts beyond my understanding Guileful tress cultural Won and muse to country's In know her,proud in call her min tent ieliat philriod. rs of the country's The Daily News nomrlly Eonensal'neon of substance CboMkatbm at nobf•0hed when Malik wrote on Twit lM post-lVer period, hue &ad, French editor hollow the inrmmmbnwil Ws readers Seller undantand an issue or new•awent 11 He shored n black-and-while image media sold Wednesday She was 93 you lhinkwe hewn made anion:,callus at 239.43S-3435 belweso 9 Am ORO5pm fnuluring Malik and their dnllghler they said Greco died in Ilea llama- Mondry through Tilde,. holding hands Ilmlid also shored a ItlMle house In the south of FEnt., similar photo on Inalagram,with the near Saint'froprs caption:-Out girl joined in earth-side The mayor ofNce.Christlen Edlnl, thin weekend and she's already Chang- tweeted that"a very grand Imly,an Im- log our weld So In lost' mense netlat Anyone.' Hadld,25,and Malik.27,have been -Wile corukn NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 2001c,I.Merl'olive dal ih, CuNMr County Plaral/1g Can,mlMlon will I,sJ a NMke MlwNryalwn Rotap,IJk he mine will IN helJMtteG,lllut County Plannl,l Ca,nmWloa public,nel,nn on uaober IS,20E3 uUnn,,.e.ino n 9,00 A M.In.he Word of County ICCPCI at 9:00 A M,One1N,15.lose t,the Nnnl of a...,rum ,.nri o , miaMeet es Chem.,Third PIN,Coen.,t:rnxrnment fen!,fen!,3299 yaw T,ttlu ill Trail, old Arco reammmernwn,Can t Carney 3299 no rases Tr)11.Nliar,Cl caw•niti M s me .len x,plta 11 raw-plrryrw•s ON Sam host.t m tumi•4r AN ORDISANCE OPTIC WAND OF COUNTSSOMMISSIONTRA OF lOL1es 1%11h 1Y)M11UmA nosyULYELCt•a'EM AND Aoe.noINu eolEIapreopnn 20Dtn 1111E COO Ire COm.TY IASI) AAIENsMENT TO TIE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELAN, nFITOnIEM COO,,Ul'AMFADUNG illy.A„oa,„MTE Zox1\O.\T-L{NAP Oa a1.ePa Ill DIDINAPELEMON.E9MO9. SASIT.enF.O,SPEC5PIIAI I.TE C 500*AMENDING THE FUTURE I AND CIIAA'GIMTIl1.4NINC.csooslrrCNf1ON Oc tal0L02rnn)NAI IW A#M.Ma OF dial Y.O.\'Ell ON LAND IN THEAND A GRICl/IIttA lIIIIRALEATE TI noatl AIIIIN ANDAD RURALILUSE FRINGE DIEM AORICIILTUMI A).HURAi AORICATURA1.NTT.A sprout TREATMENT tar.Rldt ON LAND IN THE A r,nnCETIM LANDS OVERLAY LO RURAL FRINGE MIXER USE MIF COACIIERCIAi1(G LANDS O0 OQUA ETOr FOOT Up TO LIMITED N.Sn,ASPEIAL TREAT/AM PA MILI'AIROEIRr3) 1111E SMUT UM all1101 f C CLAISE.D. TO 25e ETESTOT COMAIE RCNIVano•A 129 O0SQUAREFOOT LLINU 0 ITSAN11 UNIT ASPLCNLENMTML10 WENA 00001MG TIE m111E CISI11AY IILITE CLASSED TO 2SYSTm fat IDCCTI ALYIDMUMI T]3•)RESILIERMAL TillAHE000I ITTO UNITS AND UNIT200 DEVELMANN ACRES TEM:NA eu As nuscr TIE CUD automat-cu. aver MASTER PLAN TO DEPATIIETRTMENT or ECONOMIC C NOMIC°sportsmaTTAL .TIE A SUBJECT IHIOETN T IS24 41 ADO OLLS a'.,a IIESIGNATU ALL TRAR R9 TON US 0005 i OEoo..w„.YC;TIT A 5 A RE ANDL Or ED ATTIC SOLTI ESTY TIIE 0?001M ISALEETY Al2A Af ate IriytLLlNrr 11h'1T T1I11 A TIyrAL OI up 11aCW'UNIT%IN nil:MIA:Ih III xE\T.tT ACRES AND oEcr APPROXIMATELY AT TII[SOVTIIM'[ST COINER Or IMMOXALEE ROAD AND III!MA R PRAY ANn CONCEPTUAL WAIL MA.WL.t. 'l WAN,AND m AIM)A.TW ITS CATAWMA STREET APPROXIMATELY t G MILES WEST OP WILSON BOULEVARD IN Silt PIRA'FOR 111!S000S.T.onin STIIt1LCTYN:IPSYIYMUNWED...OPI111.11.1.. Nl1TIn02•),,,,,,11P A9Sr ,,.,2T G9T,CMLLIER COUNTY•FLORiDA IPL301e000223SI MINE FOlnll AND WC31 n•V S II.NORM ANII NFAI OF II1E w13 21,2 l PUn,Axil CAST OF ITIL NAPLES MY INTTICOLSTAL NATAw'AI IN SECTNatS 2.3.SI,TA,M AS'11 36, me IEO11P la onion,MANGY.25',Arr non SLCor s in wow droo 3O moon.int t;:la EAST EOWn COUNTY,PLOx1OA,CONSMnNG Of 1,3M,M•/-Ara15:.A\n I•MtlVlm.\Ti A.r E''W.Cllwr.IM1 C.111101000012031 ln `fy;`\ Davisalal0 I hMobiolos RD G �J Ds. cc m ,x;,� i 1 ReOMsnake Hammock NO c Project ylro m r .-_- > Location § ��F m 0 • 1 Project 3 e Location / All inn emast parties n Owl ln1 a„app :en all d IV hoodhood :nples of the prop.. / I •1 \�i(..e RESOLUTION•.Ili In warA,rt SIAN,Urn i,..silo(a ithe pk'G.alla a.'n ti1 tr,Itns n. 0A,n prelsowl it 11an,kt`t..o lnm,o.og 11.na•Jun•Of.,at Am.uotora•n tool Noun of M A.11 and 31•l rk.at l through rdalu..TkMrm•,am,the•material.will he node Causal.•for Naapr the i,00 k:knh',Ofhr.,tooth Hm Centre y Ai,lnl N eti pink.ae lm cal n apse.,and he heu C•.pr.s der snlf ti MMIYANt 1:win Cmem•Yn1rower432991,earn'witnix boil.Suite TUI x',pka.ak wx:k prior lto.1.e ,x0w•L+4L•33301.Eonof dr n•lllin°ma Sorb,cHA.a,Fnu,hlt,.e.W 'MI 11 la dui.Jlw rannOn tlut,innt p.rak•Ar0000,•konrnles:S 1J he darn ledu,the Come l w Taw,m.Nan Mere,r Norl. r;a nx 500 1.•not.e•tt ?Ill imline IT,i.iu1.a,mt'Motor MIa,e t t.aOOkm w y .N a Iid,'wide tw ran.• rw naln L MO with 11r F.I.,Towne.).ma nwu.tn,•ae,row Cla,ll to the 11•uul.OM.,now to.ktnlrr 13,3020,will Ir read ill eamalJrre.1 at the '~,,,,,ousts.raL0 mark In wag e.awn.ar..A ho.•ameton.l,o.•.w•.•ur.4-rmme,2o0ar0.e'•OI1lrt pn.arue1A. 'A`run or an,nlPni,A.os.ormtrno,re+eial•M..Mt i•e JunnN rM,otnliu.,•,a re..rnt aw .h.Ynhk •F I•he.x••,W"n.w1 C.I.tduotw..iM4.'. •m•o•mW's. watt• petal.t•all line Itnppma .,,.wIJ.Pulak a•mr.n.n m•Ioa well,.•.It,.,,Aitiow ata I 1 .t n . •e 1M.1w.t •Its 01, A-.a.. br 52 IA.h••alert an. all, lie imetwII. nai, .Cie%tax. .I likw l„panielasitll hem., .Ya1J neiwar ay Me.ee 1 •In•Ill 1t a1rO Ito M'• .v n 1•A.w fix . ad-de MILE to a t4aa Me ukd it mew,.ow We n te.M.l1 h,1 .hem.,Me meows tar Ih.lint •.I.a 1.Ara....a.1...gt.1w111.»l you•L.1.w.NA L ..t putt,ld tt •IH,, MnioA,m „pus t.•o,jt Enew,lOpdua ehi_•:WTL`.waiueAm li owlet.alio Ll`'FM)n d,,na•^ raw In.rne-•r1•t n.e.gal t ran•Ila A •000, ail neaise an en tail in roLrnee.111N,,,t'banns delIi,inN Ina'l,.rnlunknpae pol.4.N-e et a...:little.l . .mi. a•M. ;.. ,N.. ri as....Fur m.1 torn ., .hw Me u..11111.wu..... n dean We ,t, r..Matle......Lill.a,)••1.l.ta.1 0 • nil.aall2S-2SM.r ton.. d -_ - _ -aLM 13.0.24tu e.fa th.1.11 P.AllIN IS. Mt I l.•A' t >_ u:. \err''N ANn J...de. met.1„a ,I••ran the I.dlr a Word r•1 w; f ....•Ir.W.,A . 'N.'.,,,............,nlll.r...1.a a, t w Al mad• •AuntI ..Jwa .,r nt.oIIla,ttrIn And l`wmi, o,50..l . ON oat..Ptr,INM M.N.n1,1 11.,. 1Ma ••Ix II. ,ed.x ,ill.•f an Pn Fe,hog. lurk elm I.a owl lnttWva outdo Am`h,olaw,.1,'......ln•ndr.dn',Y......AM N ill.• raw r•.1•'1,V,lt+nil n okm•mew rwdwl,d,•animal I.he..,1t ....Me anp,.ln limml II tun.,ales rum,ill.a,Nalrla.•AIM•n.nl.t .»tali .Mr on pane,leaw a proven wall)J,uMlio •.,• ..Itt., loss 1,dn. 1k,.pes ohm:i t, ,tiled l' n ,M1,.�nw,p.M.1..1:o Moe.etude at, to pn„rta.y l ,I,1.1, nrlw per, 'n it • ,a Plta ' Ti a l taw 1 s4.,t ran I fa.amt..Manta,•.tun ran 1'n cal x 3 1AS Ivan 11 ,sums ,tal•1x m ) n l.a• x,1Daf 1r ILO l e teal. Trail flu .MI Napl•.IL 3.112 AS16 IoY111K1 xcol lit o,,ton Jn't prim (the , I O s 14314.1 rot l.,. w..,O.d •1Mr'n .I In.w,l tin t(mat w..I Su,onus'Iwo a+law INAMt-Irina Heal moil an aaailahle d,Our lku'd ill ,Y.xa.md.Ixama.N,NnA,r.r,nlda.Ioex lNmns re,nm,.•m,nYnl,00t,nitw.,.e mug, .uun,....,r.Wes. ti•IMrr, ,,Mil nnnno.nm •:.dl�., N ,wwn..in1 Fnlnm 111,1t ill l:•Iw•1ne,a:h.1MM. • Naples Daily News Full subscriptions Contact tor.*L. t n "ryuwdy.SIECIS1_ 1e .l.. tr.I rW iP a VO Customers vlcm do,00 Niti �w r .-.w.trw•..n. ...M. ...,.,.... 3. e.atvOw,•.. w•wn1.m ~ ,,A,- t"''wW Postal information ...,...t... I •..,. .ra vial to-, r,.em.•N•,a•., ....w•we wt.,i .,era n»..a•a er, s, Corrections and clarifications area.1 .rea......ni a,o...».,... .,.A,y..,lawn ...a..•.•,.u.N.�.....,.,rr..slv. 1 _.. ta•. -r .... ..,..•, ry ....eau..«. .,....Lon Ann P. Jennejohn From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 11:21 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: BradleyNancy; RodriguezWanda; bellows_r; ClarkeThomas; LauraDeJohnVEN Subject: 10/15 CCPC Ad request for PL20190002305 Sabal Bay MPUD (PUDR) Attachments: 2 x 3 Ad Map.pdf; Ad Request.docx; Signed Ad Request.pdf Importance: High Good afternoon, Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience. Thank you in advance, l 144 eada4tova Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Note: Email Address Has Changed Alexandra.casanova@colliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at htto://bit.ly/CollierZoning. Corer Count Exceeding Expectations Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: BradleyNancy <Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 8:01 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: CasanovaAlexandra; bellows_r; ClarkeThomas; LauraDeJohnVEN; RodriguezWanda; BradleyNancy Subject: FW: 10/15 CCPC Ad request for PL20190002305 Sabal Bay MPUD (PUDR) Attachments: 2 x 3 Ad Map.pdf; Ad Request.docx; Signed Ad Request.pdf Importance: High Good Morning, ad request is good, thanks. Nancy Bradley Legal Assistant/Paralegal Collier County Attorney's Office 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Suite 301 Naples,FL 34104 Telephone:(239)252-8549 From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 11:21 AM To: Minutes and Records<MinutesandRecords@collierclerk.com> Cc: BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay<Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; ClarkeThomas<Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>; LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: 10/15 CCPC Ad request for PL20190002305 Sabal Bay MPUD (PUDR) Importance: High Good afternoon, Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience. Thank you in advance, tkex4adlla e4daaava, Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples,FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Note: Email Address Has Changed Alexandra.casanova(a colliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning. CoLLier County Exceeding Expectations 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 11:31 AM To: CasanovaAlexandra; Minutes and Records Cc: BradleyNancy; RodriguezWanda; bellows_r; ClarkeThomas; LauraDeJohnVEN Subject: RE: 10/15 CCPC Ad request for PL20190002305 Sabal Bay MPUD (PUDR) Hi Alex, I'll get this ad processed avtd sevtd your proof a.s.a.p. Thank you! From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 11:21 AM To: Minutes and Records<MinutesandRecords@collierclerk.com> Cc: BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradley c+colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; bellows_r<Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; ClarkeThomas<Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>; LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: 10/15 CCPC Ad request for PL20190002305 Sabal Bay MPUD (PUDR) Importance: High Good afternoon, Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience. Thank you in advance, tilezeute44 eeideumia Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples,FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Note: Email Address Has Changed Alexandra.casanova@colliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning. Colter County Exceeding Expectations 1 September 14, 2020 Collier County Planning Commission Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on Friday September 25. 2020,and furnish proof of publication to the attention of Laura DeJohn,Sr. Planner in the Growth Management Department,Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, Florida 34104. The advertisement must be a 114(3x10) page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement MUST NOT BE placed in that portion of the newspaper where classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION: ZONING [Zoning Services Section] FUND&COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 72) PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500200458 Account Number: 323534 Authorize esignee signature for CCPC Advertising PL20190002305 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) at 9:00 A.M.,October 15, 2020, in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor,Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 05-59, AS AMENDED, THE SABAL BAY MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL 102.49± ACRES OF LAND ZONED RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A), RURAL AGRICULTURAL WITH A SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY(A-ST),RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY-THREE(RSF-3)AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY-THREE WITH A SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY (RSF-3-ST) TO THE SABAL BAY MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD); BY AMENDING THE PUD DOCUMENT AND MASTER PLAN TO ADD 102.49±ACRES DESIGNATED AS TRACT R9 FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT;TO ADD 230 DWELLING UNITS FOR A TOTAL OF 2,229 DWELLING UNITS IN THE MPUD;TO REVISE THE MASTER PLAN AND CONCEPTUAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN; AND TO ADD A MASTER SITE PLAN FOR THE R9 TRACT. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THOMASSON DRIVE, SOUTH AND WEST OF U. S. 41, NORTH AND WEST OF THE WENTWORTH PUD, AND EAST OF THE NAPLES BAY INTERCOASTAL WATERWAY IN SECTIONS 23, 24, 25, 26 AND 36, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, AND SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 2,518.98+/- ACRES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20190002305] (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office,fourth floor,Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401,Naples,FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to October 15,2020. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@,CollierCountyFL.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. if you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Edwin Fryer,Chairman _ 7,-. i • _,-----------'---- ,.. , PI ,. 1 Bayshore DR .„,r"'' ''A,' NO� ,..b>, rco CI o Cl) 0„) °0 . -c Ma _ 3 3 0 Collier BLVD LF %Ili, 70 0 Acct #323534 September 14, 2020 Attn: Legals Naples News Media Group 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, Florida 34110 Re: PL20190002305 (Display Ad W/MAP) Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Friday, September 25, 2020 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, together with charges involved, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500200458 September 14, 2020 Collier County Planning Commission Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on Friday, September 25, 20201 and furnish proof of publication to the attention of the Minutes & Records Department, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #401, Naples, FL, 34112. The advertisement must be a 1/4(3x10) page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement MUST NOT BE placed in that portion of the newspaper where classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION: ZONING [Zoning Services Section] PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500200458 Account Number: 323534 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) at 9:00 A.M.,October 15, 2020, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor,Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDNANCE NO. 05-59, AS AMENDED, THE SABAL BAY MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL 102.49± ACRES OF LAND ZONED RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A), RURAL AGRICULTURAL WITH A SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY(A-ST),RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY-THREE(RSF-3)AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY-THREE WITH A SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY(RSF-3-ST) TO THE SABAL BAY MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD); BY AMENDING THE PUD DOCUMENT AND MASTER PLAN TO ADD 102.49±ACRES DESIGNATED AS TRACT R9 FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT;TO ADD 230 DWELLING UNITS FOR A TOTAL OF 2,229 DWELLING UNITS IN THE MPUD;TO REVISE THE MASTER PLAN AND CONCEPTUAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN; AND TO ADD A MASTER SITE PLAN FOR THE R9 TRACT. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THOMASSON DRIVE, SOUTH AND WEST OF U. S. 41, NORTH AND WEST OF THE WENTWORTH PUD, AND EAST OF THE NAPLES BAY INTERCOASTAL WATERWAY IN SECTIONS 23, 24, 25, 26 AND 36, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, AND SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 2,518.98+/- ACRES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20190002305] (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, prior to October 15,2020. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@CollierCountyFL.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101,Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Edwin Fryer, Chairman 10. Bayshore DR v/11 r o o• � _ 7 .....„....e., SD 3 \14N4..... 0 Collier BLVD ‘1110 70 0 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 12:14 PM To: Naples Daily News Legals Subject: PL20190002305 (Display Ad W/MAP) Attachments: PL20190002305 (CCPC 10-15-20).doc; PL20190002305 (CCPC 8-10-15-20).docx; PL20190002305.pdf Please advertise the attached (W/MAP) on Friday September 2.5, 2020. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn 13MR Sevtior Deputy Clerk 0,TRTIYk:k Clerk to the Value Adjustmevtt Board ,ZZ4 44110 Office: 239-2s2-s406 Fax: 239-252-840S (if applicable) Ann.Jevtvtejohvt@CollierClerk.cow Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court rtl��texti{'ti•y%`��� & Comptroller of Collier Comity 3299 Tamiawti Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com Ann P. Jennejohn From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 11:53 AM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Cc: Gannett Legals Public Notices Subject: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 Attachments: ND-GCI0493586-01.PDF; ND-GC10493591-01.PDF External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments,clicking links,or replying to this message. Hello Ann, I hope this email finds you well! I have attached the proofs for your scheduled Legal Display ad runs on Fri 9/25, please see the run info below— Ad#GC10493586(PL20190002305) Publication—Naples Daily News Size/Section—% PG I Main Run Date(s)—9/25 Affidavit-Yes Total-$1046.26 Ad#GCI0493591 (PL20180002233) Publication—Naples Daily News Size/Section—1/4 PG I Main Run Date(s)—9/25 Affidavit-Yes Total -$1046.26 Please let me know any needed updates/changes or if these can be approved as is. Please Note:The deadline for approval is Thursday 9/24 at 1PM EST Thank you, Ben Dailey Team Lead I Client Success, SMB ONETW0 KY LOCALIQ Office: (317)444-5032 I bdailey@localiq.com 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) at 9:00 A.M.,October 15, 2020, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 05-59, AS AMENDED, THE SABAL BAY MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.2004-41,THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL 102.49±ACRES OF LAND ZONED RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A), RURAL AGRICULTURAL WITH A SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY (A-SD,RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY-THREE(RSF-3)AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY-THREE WITH A SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY(RSF-3-ST)TO THE SABAL BAY MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD); BY AMENDING THE PUD DOCUMENT AND MASTER PLAN TO ADD 102.49± ACRES DESIGNATED AS TRACT R9 FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; TO ADD 230 DWELLING UNITS FOR A TOTAL OF 2,229 DWELLING UNITS IN THE MPUD; TO REVISE THE MASTER PLAN AND CONCEPTUAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN;AND TO ADD A MASTER SITE PLAN FOR THE R9 TRACT. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THOMASSON DRIVE, SOUTH AND WEST OF U. S. 41, NORTH AND WEST OF THE WENTWORTH PUD,AND EAST OF THE NAPLES BAY INTERCOASTAL WATERWAY IN SECTIONS 23, 24, 25, 26 AND 36, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, AND SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 2,518.98+/- ACRES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.[PL20190002305] • Davis BLVD ❑ m Nd-9; Rattlesnake Hammock RD l• a) Project Location e All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Suite 401,Naples,FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section,prior to October 15,2020. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely,as well as in person,during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely,should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountvfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting,please call Thomas Clarke at(239)252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@CollierCountyFL,gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Edwin Fryer,Chairman ND-GCI0493586-01 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P. Jennejohn Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:10 PM To: BradleyNancy; CasanovaAlexandra; ClarkeThomas Cc: RodriguezWanda; LauraDeJohnVEN Subject: PL20190002305: Sabal Bay Proof (10-15-20 CCPC Meeting) Attachments: ND-GC10493586-01.PDF Please review the attached for publication September zs, 2020. Ann Jenne,jotin 13MR Sevtior Deputy Clerk *1,° Clerk to the Value Adjustvvtevtt Board Office: 23q-zsz-s4o( Fax: 23q-2.52.-8408 (if applicable) Avun..Jevtvtejohvt@CollierClerk.cowt •r • 'x, Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller of Collier County 32gq Tamiami Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 3411z-5324 www.CollierClerk.com Ann P. Jennejohn From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 5:31 PM To: Minutes and Records Cc: ClarkeThomas; RodriguezWanda; BradleyNancy; LauraDeJohnVEN Subject: FW: PL20190002305: Sabal Bay Proof(10-15-20 CCPC Meeting) Attachments: ND-GC10493586-01.PDF County Attorney, We have received approvals for this ad proof—PL2019-2305, can you please review and advise if good to go for final processing.Thank you kindly. Respectfully, Ileezawilha e4444044. Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples,FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning. coIPr County Exceeding Expectations From: LauraDeJohnVEN<Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 4:21 PM To:CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov>; Dawn Russell <DawnR@barraco.net> Cc: ClarkeThomas<Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>;AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: PL20190002305: Sabal Bay Proof(10-15-20 CCPC Meeting) Approved Laura DeJohn, AICP Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Services (Vendor) 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Desk: (239) 252-4324 laura.dejohn@colliercountyfl.gov From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:31 PM To: LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountyfl.gov>; Dawn Russell<DawnR@barraco.net> 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 11:30 AM To: Ann P. Jennejohn Cc: ClarkeThomas; LauraDeJohnVEN Subject: FW: Ad Proof for Approval/PL20190002305: Sabal Bay Proof PUDA (10-15-20 CCPC Meeting) Attachments: FW: Ad Proof for Approval/PL20190002305: Sabal Bay Proof PUDA (10-15-20 CCPC Meeting) Ann, Please find County Attorney approval on ad proof for Sabal Bay PL2019-2305. Please proceed with final processing. Thank you Respectfully, filexaadm eamaaua Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples,FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountvfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning. CIL 9unty Exceeding Expectations Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: BradleyNancy <Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 10:19 AM To: Minutes and Records; Ann P.Jennejohn Cc: CasanovaAlexandra; ClarkeThomas; RodriguezWanda; BradleyNancy Subject: Atty Approval of Ad Proof/PL20190002305: Sabal Bay Proof PUDA (10-15-20 CCPC Meeting) Attachments: ND-GCl0493586-01.PDF Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Good Morning,please see attorney approval below,thanks. Nancy Bradley Legal Assistant/Paralegal Collier County Attorney's Office 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Suite 301 Naples,FL 34104 Telephone:(239)252-8549 From:Ashton Heidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 9:11 AM To: BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: CasanovaAlexandra<Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov>; ClarkeThomas <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Ad Proof for Approval/PL20190002305: Sabal Bay Proof PUDA(10-15-20 CCPC Meeting) Approved. Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-8773 From: BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:13 PM To:AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez(a colliercountyfl.gov>; BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradley@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject:Ad Proof for Approval/PL20190002305: Sabal Bay Proof(10-15-20 CCPC Meeting) Hi Heidi,attached for your approval,thanks. Nancy Bradley Legal Assistant/Paralegal Collier County Attorney's Office 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Suite 301 1 Naples,FL 34104 Telephone:(239)252-8549 From:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jenneiohn@collierclerk.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:10 PM To: BradleyNancy<Nancy.Bradley@colliercountvfl.gov>; CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov>; ClarkeThomas<Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: RodriguezWanda<Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; LauraDeJohnVEN <Laura.DeJohn@colliercountvfl.gov> Subject: PL20190002305: Sabal Bay Proof(10-15-20 CCPC Meeting) EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please review the attached for publicatiovt September 25, 2020. Ann Jennejohn 13MR Sevtior Deputy Clerk tv.01.0,„r Clerk to the Value Adjustmevtt Board Office: 23 q-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Avul-Jertvlejokurt@CollierClerk.com Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court `s1/4 & Comptroller of Collier Couvtty 32q Tamiami Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient,you must not copy,distribute or take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message. Unless expressly stated,opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Clerk's Office by emailing helpdesk@collierclerk.com quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents.The Collier County Clerk's Office accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the CollierClerk.com domain. Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 11:31 AM To: 'Dailey, Benjamin' Subject: RE: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20190002305 Approved for publicatiovt. Thank you. Ann Jennejohn 13MR Senior Deputy Clerk ` ttST(,n(kiy Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Office: 239-252-8406 1 - Fax: 239-252-8408 (if applicable) Avua.Jeytmejokm@CollierClerk.com 'x.,< szi Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller of Collier Couvtty 3299 Tawiawti Trail, Suite #401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.Co(lierClerk.cowt From: Dailey, Benjamin <bdailey@localiq.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:17 PM To:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Cc: Gannett Legals Public Notices<GanLegPubNotices@gannett.com> Subject: Naples Daily News Legal Display Ad Proofs I Fri 9/25 - PL20190002305 External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hello Ann, I have attached the proof for PL20190002305, please see the run details below- Ad#GCl0493586 (PL20190002305) Publication-Naples Daily News Size/Section-% PG I Main Run Date(s)-9/25 Affidavit-Yes Total -$1046.26 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public heanng will he held by the Collier County Planning Conunissiun (CCPC)at 9:00 A.M.,October 15,2020, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Rtwnt. Third Floor.Collier Government Center,3299 Fast Tamiami'frail.Naples FL..to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COWER COUNTY.FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 05-59. AS AMENDED. THE SABAL BAY MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,AND AMENDING ORDINANCE.NO.2004-41,THE COWER COI All'LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL 102.491 ACRES OF LAND ZONED RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A), RURAL. AGRICULTURAL WITH A SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY (A-ST),RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY-THREE(RSF-3)AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY-THREE WITH A SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY (RSF-3-ST)TO THE SABAL BAY MIXED USE PLANNED N Is UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD): BY AMENDING THE PI'D f)OCI MENT AND MASTER PLAN TO ADI) 102.49-1 ACRES DESIGNATED AS TRACT R9 FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; TO ADD — 230 DWELLING UNITS FOR A TOTAd. OF 2.229 DWELLING UNITS IN THE MPUD:TO REVISE 'r at THE MASTER PLAN AND CONCEPTUAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN;AND TO ADD A MASTER p SITE.PLAN FOR THE R9 TRACT. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THOMASSON < DRIVE, SOUTH AND WEST OF U. S. 41. NORTH AND WEST OF THE. WENTWORTH PhD, AND EAST OF THE NAPLES BAY INTERCOASTAL WATERWAY IN SECTIONS 23, 24. 25. 26 AND 34. m TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH. RANGE 25 EAST.AND SECTION 19,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH. RANGE 26 b EAST, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 2,51$.9b+/- ACRES: AND PROVIDING AN m EFFECTIVE DATE.1P1?01900023051 In m xi IQ Davis BLVD ___If , 0 ra t li o ? Z LI' 1 �,d _Rattlesnake HammocklRDati I .. ,--;,::. ills,CIAI d>"'",,IT CI IS d m f Project Location 0 All interested parties are invited to appear and he heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will he made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office.Fourth Floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 East'f'amiami Trail,Suite 401.Naples.FL.one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must Ic filed with the Zoning Division.Zoning Services Section, prior to October 15.2020. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the C:OVID 19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public continents remotely,as well as in person.during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely.,should register any time alter the agenda is posted on the County website which is fi days betnre the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at iswoc.00llicrviuntyfLgov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the m eeting,please call Thomas Clarke at(239)252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipaUc n Collier_C.untya.g.•f. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore may need to ensure that.o verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodati.in in order to participate in this pit/seeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision tit certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at +335 Tamiami Trail Fast, Suite lot Naples. FL 34112-5356.(239)252-11380.at least two days pair to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are acailabk in the Board i.I County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Edwin Fryer,Chairman apirizi Batt Nriui PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 BCC ZONING DEPT 3299 TAMIAMI TRL STE 401 NAPLES,FL 34112 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier County,Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples,in said Collier County, Florida,and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida,each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 9/25/2020 Subscribed and sworn to before on September 25th,2020: _ ..,.h YY1 uvk<9 1.roc Notary,State of WI,County of Brown JJ�TARA MONDLOCH NIA Notary Public f{ State of Wisconsin My commission expires: August 6,2021 Publication Cost:S1,04(I 26 Ad No GCI0493586 Customer No:323534 PO#:4500200458 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing%A ill be held by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) at 9:00 A.M., October 15,2020, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 05-59, AS AMENDED, THE SABAL BAY MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.2004-41,THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL 102.49±ACRES OF LAND ZONED RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A), RURAL AGRICULTURAL WITH A SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY (A-ST), RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY-THREE(RSF-3)AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY-THREE WITH A SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY (RSF-3-ST)TO THE SABAL BAY MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD); BY AMENDING THE PUD DOCUMENT AND MASTER PLAN TO ADD 102.49± ACRES DESIGNATED AS TRACT R9 FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; TO ADD 230 DWELLING UNITS FOR A TOTAL OF 2,229 DWELLING UNITS IN THE MPUD; TO REVISE THE MASTER PLAN AND CONCEPTUAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN;AND TO ADD A MASTER SITE PLAN FOR THE R9 TRACT. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 1S LOCATED SOUTH OF THOMASSON DRIVE, SOUTH AND WEST OF U. S. 41, NORTH AND WEST OF THE WENTWORTH PUD,AND EAST OF THE NAPLES BAY INTERCOASTAL WATERWAY IN SECTIONS 23, 24, 25, 26 AND 36, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, AND SECTION 19,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 2,518.98+/- ACRES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.fPL20190002305] Davis BLVD I' .�41 c a l -Q Rattlesnake Hammock RD CO 03 d Project Ts Location e All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Suite 401,Naples,FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must he filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to October 15,2020. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely,as well as in person,during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely,should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.coil it:rcuunlvlLeuc. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting,please call Thomas Clarke at(239)252-2526 or email to t,t,l't Item,teParticipaji„j!C..11ier(;ountyFl..yov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 T:uniami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356,(239) 252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired:ire available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Edwin Fryer,Chairman No-GCI049J50601 2A I FRIDAY SEPTrr.rece 25 2020 I MAPLES DAILY NEWS START PEOPLE IN THE NEWS ,...b Florida Lottery JACKPOT TRIPLE PLAY Dolly Parton shares that dating oil and on fur several years She Mir ..she has'tasteful'tat tops has become one of the world's moss le demand models,and he was the hist to •• Dolly Porton is all totted up.well, leave One Oheellon to sulks out as n 1 FLORIDA LOTTO ..Welly,al least .solo artist ' ,,,•, "l do hove sulk tattoos,that s tree:' «w.,r , nd .:�.:�� Isr country music iron told PEOPLE in Actor Reynolds looking us••I.......1, .tot •• FANTASY an wtielc posted Wedoo'sday 'Out to Invest In Welsh soccer club ......he.°..ilia~ they're tasteful Ire not a tenon girl. ►OWERRALL,.III r ._Sr n..eaA Site said she has"indictee and lows Hollywood slurs Kyrie Reynolds and and horterfliee,"olong with a beehive Rob Mr0llonoey could be making an .t al_._ m.nwL� .., . on PICK 2,3,4,5 that enters n mar unlikely foray into the sneeor business ."6'[...wmnPr,[nuw Rut enlddehrbniklutopian u linen! Wrexham, Wel sh learn that plays rne:q ad•u In, " ink to something tense visible? In the filth tics n esocr, • l English a rr ',I.:.'„ +rl °ii,i,.ea 1'aa:1 - [ n.•,, 'Who knows,I may gel seine more waled Wednesday that Reynolds and ,.a saw a Isles'she said"I may just love In get McElhennry nee the'two extremely MEGA MILLIONS ,1 • ,r e ,e 1 covered with lsh oes lust au everybody wet-known individuals"the dub haX CASN4IJFE could be right' pteYlously said are interested in invest- runner,MainIr rs.a,-,,,.a ew.110. t) Patton recently announced a new ing625 million erect,•'we moss la o�e.y c-m«e/1.1. seer Cilrinlmas album,set to release Oct 2, Reynolds is a Canadian-boat setae motored, l,M.:ewtua agar 1.1 s iwam roe wl}..auto I,MI ,11 e,a,atearl best known for starting In the"Dead- 'min..I.•rr..r•twsun .arrow leis ton>nm 'Orate uh Ole}N alw adld weks pool'movies.McElhenney,a blend of +.•..r•.....er.r baby girl with 2ayn Malik Reynolds,is an American actor and di- rectos who woe lire orator of TV show Model Gigl flarlid end her musician -It's Alwnye Sunny in Philadelphia" Inryfrlend 2eyn Malik took Cu social Wrexham to been a fan-owned swot.LolMryr.wl1c nor nalouwy ewe or tee Aso Olt rule media to celebrate the arrival of an In- club shoe 2011 fast girl,with duel saying he's"grateful' and'thankful." Raspywolced French "re try pal into words low I an,feel- singer Greco dles al 93 ilrg right now would be an Impossible task The love I fowl her thle tiny human Juliette Green,a French singer,ac- ts beyond my unde,elandIng Grateful tress,militate(Icon and muse to rxts- CORRECTIONS In knew her.prmrd 0 toll(her mine,' lenlisllet philrreophers of the country's the Cosily News promptly entice('all moss a substance Clarifications ire publ'shed when Malik wrote on Twine, post-War period, has died, French odkors believe the intornnalen will help readers bolter understand an Issue ernes evenI II Ile,Resod a Ito*and wheat near media said Wednesday.She wee 9:4 you Unite we Iran made an error,tell use 239435-3435 between 9 a re and 5pm laAtusti g Malik nod Odell Omsk. They said Orecu died in her Users- Monday through Friday IXrkllllg bonds Haiti atm.slimed A these haven in the south of Prance, similes photo on Insiagram,with tho near Saint Teepee option:"Our girl joined us earth-side The mayor of Nice,Chdslion Cstrosi, thin weekend and she's already chin- tweeted that'a very grand Illy,an im- Ilrg our world.So In love' menu artist has gone.' Hadld,23,and Malik,27,have been .-Wire.ren dre, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING N ldk mra,i nib}'DMln hat the Cane County MagNea ComMnloa wig hold a Rine lllnln'a^mdm,emddlr hoeing w916NR#1141be[Wile,Counts Mania,Commnnwl row October/S,seas w,t...ring Cr Pal AM.In the Muni oil Crawl' IUrCI at 1poA M,eeelwr 15,tole I.the Mont re(Venn fa Urmmhalalwn l2NntNr,THrd Flom,Coomy 000 n„n Ceter,S299 IYN T.rmbed Troll, A1.4Mew.I.n01en,eo,nmro,rmor,32•A I',V 10.I,elhe,l vies'In io 44rra,6rlp ulm, Naples PI Our porpoise of the Inad.a Is r0 tomMee AN ORDINANCE or IIIE mwXD wl'Cnl'.V I1 Co IAINISV n}'00 UY 1 nILIEa COI.Y'l1,FU)RIIw A RR50LIn DIN 00 lNa BOARD OP!AUNTY COMMISSIONERS P000005Nf. A11EVn1.Vn n'1XX 4:E NO Mrc A'i,II5aorr 1111}AMP 11,E}USED 151 PLANNED AMENDAIEII TO TIE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTII MANERS re! PLAN, Iet11OEYElao•MI:XL ANII veins,'or,ORDINANCE 2eMg11111 t MIMSp ll, IANO ors ORDINANCE a9 O5,AS AME2mf0,SPECIFIGt1V AM0NDINII TIIE FUTURE.LAND nC\'EI IN}II:VI tal1W.,NV AAI[XnlXn TIE M4'MbPM,I I:21XIx,1 EIr.\S MAP till RAPS m USE ELEMEMAND MAP SERIISTO CRIATRTFIENCSQ1CME MIXE0.USEOVERUI' tsIANGI.ND 111e coneN'Or Ies4111r.Al IUX OF Al,An1M111LV,,Ina 192 MAE4(n I_n tynYY.n ON LAND IN TIE AGRICULT1iML/111IML DESIGNATION AND RIIML FRINGE 11oSA1 A,,M,:lll.nawl lU al'sa,A11XN1 I.II Xal Neill A'Pr,.110 TXFAn3ICYT1.51.LAI' MIXED USE DISTRICT-RECEIVING 1ANDS OVERLAY TO ALLOR•UP TO 44,400 01411 nFSInE.TIAI SII1n1P.MARIS TINEE HISS M AND LFaIMEYTIAI SI.YMIr F.,.WII Ellen. SQUARE FEET OF COMAIERCLALUIOS,A 12,006 SQUARE FOOT DAYCARE UNITED Wllil.l SPECIAL IMEATAONT,M EXLO 111%,3 SO 10 IIIL Ire\L es,}UAI Is nat.PUNNED TO250 STWENTS,AND A MARIMUM OP 129 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UMT$ANU torn DE\ELomen}TCMYIMA Ry ALBINISM:TIE ells iwno:ArEYI ANu}MST.MN TO FtreT31E153tosa OIRECTINGTRANEN1TTAL OE TIIEAMSNOMENTTOTIE FMRIDA Apn lot one nearn naHXAnn,Y mom se rate monism\L nme,A•NEVT,Yt At,,, DEPARTMENT Or ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 24 ire 2p IVA•Lu1Na 1'Rns F1w A solar IN M 22e IRal:Lunf.I n11N LV no,o,.'r D,lw se,Iva. ACRES AND LOCATED ATTIE SOUTHwoa'r CORNER OF IAteeO0A1EE ROM AND TIP.}IA}ILM I'LAY"A.YIl C11.Yf:l:l•It'11M'A'I rX MAV wa All n'I YI.\V:AYIl 10\n1e,\MA,ILX VATAWM STREET APPROXIMATELY 1 6 MILES WEST OF WILSON BOULEVARD IN nECf10N29,10wllosmep 49 eosnn1.RANG027 EA0T,COWee COtIMfY.RORIDA. silo I•IANIIMIIN M I MALT.Irlr.An11111'IPX,MNX1l'IS Intl,rll:ll.e,r1111 OF 1114}Iw,11w IPL2elao0U22551 inn....SUL'vll AM,meal UI L'S 11 M)XII1 AM)M151 eo I,a.11nsrolalll Pl II mat Gel U 1111 MAMA IMI rN 1 0550MI 1 eMA\III -IONS 24 21 le N AYn M, WTI/A11N 41 soul in,I I:30 EVST.AND In 1n nit IY Ia}I101111RA 1F'R, T',ML111:X Oa Sal,I lomat,COSSISllxei In 311A4X,/MAI.I:1Yn eelwlDlY11 AN Y.YI'EC11VE MIK N1m14meNYM1 Z l' I Davis BLVD 1 r........) • ,( iis ,....„___ Immohat RO to Ra111aa2m110 Ham ckmo RD Project M �'•, o Location a � m • • YE' 0 Project Location All Imer.wavl pnia•n on/in.ilad „appear and lw hewn. I6,M,or ibe I.n,P..41 \ e RESOLUTION will he;lade available foe touahns'I1,eat GIer' e ine nirinorn. filerrpreherwi\e Planning Sn'drn,MINI N Hor Punt Ile,Neekv etwe n Ile lu,u,a It 41111 A ie anal 5.00 P.M Lleronl throngs Friday.l', lIth,n,the materiab will he mole r.112111.•lie m'nror, n at rho.laser or tmni lied,('11k e,North Orm e I a prior r II,,I UI nn,enc,el to ni,.r.e in.e n.in,,r...le.o x.1 1.Ip...l.M y...l.m,1,i.,lI t,l 1 w Gnaw...era Center,3299 teal,,Linwood pertaining Sake 4111.Peak•,m neck plkn 1a,dw .n,a.a,la1'I he nor,..ix.,„II.1,11.,,'.m 'l.•e4Ar 1 DIM r4..r I AI whrdl,kW Meant,Any muesli. t rt'inin^,n oho-dm,rents Avoid Ire Jirerood no sits 11A111 Zoning M.N.,1,nlpn,w 1 e Planning Swl I IR'Itle, a ling with Isr emu. inn,e,0 eau v,Alter awl ho b Noolw Mr,,N..1 t ..„`,I.., .,S o „n., Clerk no the•11'mrd'111rre pgMn In OrlMee 15,2020 w Il be re..6 an IMuor.kred 111. .e Mi amn m•soul I ,%', nu.n/. nna..an' , n Wilk/hearing .atMlwk.,'et^lelpx1V A,nenrannru}Yrirf k' 14.10Ionl Md,ldi.antinedwmne11DClw111,190IwOnto _Np1 R..no n5Ixna„en x.r, ., nnl9 rut.,""ar rlw F0,hlie will have oho a p^.mnily o molar puldlo ter. r.mxo1), n'11 a rwllxnx , r,M..pain n pan 1er(r, ..IO' .. I n01 a,I b e ruin dodiIn the,poet ling Indio h,nb who.world IOa I'rank loans . k,.I 1r'Inl, JnHu, w, w, 4,i,, Ills Arnold n'piaer any lin..alio file xr Nato is prwwel tin die Corn melon.. IJeti,a t i n,. He a0m,ll a• nmxl l 11,.^n'nrI .I n ng iln.nr l,nl 1111, Infwe,I o r e,in$,h,eolgh the li,dl'imitated I,.olio lr,• ry l the u, eel.., hr on.,11w . '.e'.Jn. l.n r r orlon_elm w'In,,o 1Y,,''l f atn Inns IJtlol. Ins rotten will Nee�M•coned In,rhea a Itrhe 'in,,oil ro n, ,. �1. r Ail Maw Mrn,,..,-x x� P 111 'e' I M nor n yearl,ripar ,x,A,r n Ilthann.ing nor ml'IA,.n d r.e I s .411, a .,r1 a,. o,,I..idle I, a.k,Inn I.m.,I , hoS ttttt t,i.o,Cann lire o.nh,y I -'l.nor, r.rCI,.W a,(IPA ME MO.n son ad on ,,,even as,„a........a..,...,JM1. u,wea Hiroo 11 ....Ne•.' .,11 Ih'wu.1N1„4 uauw1.,,lw.la,vuH'fltan'n 'Ic ar_v,.,u.a, • tiny loci.,,etc.tinkles ni u(M,Cr,,,sh..wa,d der e.R..1 ,n•ued.4 wy Lee w ..L.„I.,• .. ,�. C.mx e.W nrnlr rsol,.flhe lw.u..Jna:•'"/. ntur, ..,dn,.l.e.w, •A^m , 4. .I,k. Ir ln" 1u nCull,11.11.1 1 • ,•m..n. n Y4111 �n'du ,Mu,e,e I,n4r1R.tor. X r, a,L wtmk w,.ol MMLeb. n .',MT1'In 1.............H...Irl,n d.....,I n "� , air Inoun,r)and est&r onion M.appeal i.banal •IA I'II,, P Aolo,Ja 1.•nor xn.m.vn,w1..nl•w•nl., II 4.1 nr a 1 rvii welt a dl.eh.lh,wlr' ..a,en,a r w.lalk r der o pannvpa du,snorted.,rl,l .till'A t ,riles'pen r raran,n..Nw n , ..,, ,.I.,m..h,. ,,.w, ,..,.., r.. •u•,,. Ileum t die Ia,ll'rn only Y.u1hr,'Akin:on/mon Olt, n1 Lasted,in 11S O , pin" "' ,, 1�,1'Maw T I Fv.e3 ,e lnl Nagle.T 51112 tS M !Y31!4!NSny r Men two b,.prior ,11� '1 'r nlal 1, rA•,m,1 n.' a r'I Iru1 , slung Avileld lino irony dtnk-,an ha•Ma ne impanel In a,sil',ile i1 it eHo w1.4 'vp1,..3',II23W�1H,1 t34W'1u le J a„ 1 n11rr1 .,,,, ea V, , a'a.rn e , o,0L.,.r. t..sa IM In 1114 kvpn,.1 x ,.,,1,14,in,I.Ik,r I a".n .n ram.w'Iu,. „rn, A 1.411e1r e:.nn.1 1•laod ..k ..I ,.r ng 1„nOret I.,a xl 14 ,•m,, nu, ItMle liner hdn'un 1 olx to 1,41 1laanan Naples Daily News F""'-`�'"'-"""'°' `""""a:. m/www•wM.Aw1rM u 1 can to a e bNa a,m,-sax ore owe mk.ean.io w'PFme van.•'c Ile a[!,ter,r CUStO a .w_ n,uuxee erT. ra e ea'wen',won.,wino,.resonno as,.onion.ew,oso .m see IIN.mein.. e.V.Le V• w1M[.- tie,r,.w •"•"•x x.,..,n.l,_- . rawraet stsavIwurwmarlptionna4m.e.v.cean err,con " eves nnlelma .nnnoro,y ,o wa,,.,m.1.1/+au.rA• Postal Information ewuuw.Mw•n3l.•.r:•a+... aae 4rF}na ' .reek}+r•r d, taro 0,a1114.1.1,we C,T Ions and elNNleations .1�w.411/.rl 1.111T, c. ,c) (- zw z ~ c C4 Ww = z 0 V Cn � ~ CO• F_ I-- ¢ o IX J zo Q ¢ L Z w °wWI ($' I- I- w Z Cr) fq > H --... m � O W CL vi.v__. 065 GI = O ' w Q O ~ ' __I�\ I L Q u) I--- I- W Q a. - 5 CJJ � w ce I m � i4 0.)----- C._, wzw Z 0,s at_ 0( O W ocI pO Z � � I.O W N Etd I- CJ C J IL .� ¢ Q QOm Fri Ou) J U o v� = W U 00 = qj U W O O 0 CD m Z W o J Lij CC W ..... 0 000 0 c = m CU V U, ix ¢ m W Op H c) 2 0 w w moF- W = 0 = C a "0 , 0 F- I- Ct 1/47 F- 0 0 `Ift. w ¢ O oZ Zz � cCZ z � 0Q w =, ¢ w � Cn z i a. Q � W � J � IJ Z M m LLB z 0 W ��- o z 1_ Iw- W \/1 No zw J Cn O —IO - 0°- a. a 0 __ 0" wv C] zw O z Z Cn z d z W H- z � W E �i c , I- 5 wm U 0 > J cc J CD �a Q W o a. 01 = z Q = a : w wo 0 a 0 C a) L 0 z U Q a M E W zw z 0o D4 0f Q Z w _ U I CCw W off = > � 1- o — J m � >," ¢z o Q- z-J aWJ J Li = wO 0 = UU) I ¢ I- I- Wjn0 z Z �� m � Q iii oW a -J � 0 �CI I w J z Q 0 U w Q ¢ o O Yccnn J ` d I- LL.I - - 0I � o1- . } J . � ocQz�k C o woo -o n� ; 00 Z mr O C.) V cm fy Cl- u_ ■ Ill Q ¢ m Z 0 O cn --I O .V Lid ¢ O/ F-- LL W = t wZzC) W •O w �ID O~ °' ` zw � w � 'I-' ...a E zoQ � � = m woo 0 0o Q Et..) o ¢ w LLB }-- o= w Q ¢ O -2CD o IZ Z ED< wZ = ¢ 2 ¢w ►=0 CO¢ ~ m ^ cc NIcnzz I- D O W ��� zM= CI LC? Ca 110 W I . No ~ zw _Ii �-- 1 )� of 0 o � a. cn Q Uz 0 zw O cn z U zu¢ w � ' W_ Z E k := _ mwm O : \Io ,0o > -- CKQ }, 0I- W J Ha\ } ¢ C 0 a) w O O o J 1- 0 Z < * Z v ¢ q' zw 7 ~ � o Ce v a CD = z e, w 0 cn U _� � = I-- o R ^ \ m , >' zoQ i ~ � wJZ w = O ¢ zC.)nH F- iU) in \ C7 CO z Z �1U\ w Lil V m � ce O1±1 W d. N o f 0 o . W J Jz Q W � W ¢ ter I- 11J ¢ p. 0� 0 I- Q Z - — O UiY w Q t < 0 � 0 J al_ o_ z � z w a eC-o o c o E_- oLI- oOz mr O CI C[ ° uw'- u~.. t� oo 2 zwLLI •�• amz 0w O a 9 _ � O OO mil N Z z = a O �ON_ Luf: Q� M r co m¢ O = av OQ 1 -tYml N CU O w W a aww ¢ 0 Oz ro i o '= o z 12 o Q ' w =, ¢ 5 w = m �. Cl) Z I- CI- O `v-F- r'N LC) Ca LLB, aO W o z =I .. H r W i N Es � Z o = O F a zv I- O � M O 11 Oz w z`=' z COj Z f- ¢ w F' zg w E A .2 CD }� F J En- __I�� I- Q OU ~ .�■ 1 Z 0 C.) D Z < J 0 0- 'CS co ce cc CD >- c CD ' a E UU < a Z Ce CG Q 0 = z U U' E. c~—n W w >-- z Ct CD >. ¢ o - O .J ? a, W � 0 CC < z al 0 = 0 ¢ aa¢. ¢ F- ¢ mo U) z > Z t/� 1- w � W wp i¢ I--- � z0 09 cm � O W � � f Q w W \ t.) co ,�� � ccz LOB Q ¢ 0_ V 5... 'd' Ci Q r W Q� tiQw W � m 1 C z0 - o � z v ` < I a Q U O = y opm z mo O L '� o C ¢ C�n (--) J CL_ z o n �-. - z Q 0 O up = ~ mz = O � o O 0 =F- u.. tL CD 0 zwo u) w J c, w ~ • O � � a Q N ¢ mow LL Op E- 13 o < ¢Si ZCD w w 0 W I • 6 0 - G� a7:5 m .5-- z z OLL2 z O C� M 0 p la- z >- 111 F- 0_ Q �N N U Q W 0Q LL. Q w Ce z 0 W 4z0W = wcn F- -c-i- ' ) 0 < 0 ' o_ kc \ zWo p zw O ----0 , wU W cnz (..) \--" Z C ` Co woo � � � Q _ m ._I - 1 C, a u) Q U -: :�C5) co o eL C o u) t 0ci) CL at( CZ z rx z Y z w = z wv V (i Ct w W cc O = = L.I. >. w = F-- on \ m I__ ¢ o § -I za ¢ fx Z IA in q = I p <CD = .0 co (-5-7 z w r4 >- LL1 W I-U Q O ai CIO O C_ � . en CD YI- O O W W = � ELLi - IwQ9.: C_4 v 0 V + W O Z O C I Crl rx O Q o o = N O F-co U F- LL LJ.. 000 Z m p 1 W a. I- .— `\ Z < p n Zj W Q. ; �nmQ O Ocn _I O o = � c� ~oo = H -1 \ NZZ = r O a 4 zWaO � � w CC meal IMMI - z o ¢ Lt = m frt o 0 y CC ¢ m "- oo ta- L O _w co `L- � w "0 .n 'a >-co F. = W o C n- Q o o LLI ¢ O Z t-- QD o oI= o Z LL_ Yv OZ Qz ¢ Ct ^ m < 0 °3 _Ti W z oN � m Zoo w. co = w � F- '` 1 00 o ~ 12 JVQ� Q zw o ~• it z j Io CL n Wid z O z Oc� W1Z ¢ E- ►- C w z z7 q3 o � Q no 0 � w CO - co � z a J co 'a Ov m O°� tCO Ec a) 0 z a D CAD CD 2 a CC r- CD N ••D CC CD -<� 0 m = ^= C UO O WG 0 - C 0 D c o CO- - -o = o m () r' 'rt r— m � r_ -Io = ,` CD 0com 2 rn v -zi =� ma 1 00 mcn M zz fi Z 1=1n E c"'no —I 0 > 't O -D � -_I 0 Co ' '.. '1 rrrl 7j z-.i -I 2 0 1 S -I corm 2 0E D zmm m c_w -n r0 m -ID 0 00 ) Wozcn xj- _, m E Drm D o zo-I G � __I C Dom o .� Q � cQ.= Cr - 0oo \ Cro0 � bag - oo N o Ow � 4 ' 0o = ODoz .. - — rM 1-xm omD �r 9 .D cn --1 0m -° 0 - - m 0 � 0 C CG7o %. oo n m m D � \�� O � z ooz �rn m0 ■ Z7 D n O PoW moo -I o cno- m7 0 � Z mzm 0 C7D - C � r- omcc 31 m O cn m m ril z -I CD m m m 0 o D Cn cn 0 iii m o * 0 � o X mo xi 70W < z C/) o � cS'\, N.) Z m --I 0 m 0 CDm = I- m Z 7J D D 0 z I • rr- o D -G =i Q, m 70 M m � - I 0 m W 0 rm z 2 mz C y D :v o 0 -1 z _ � mz z_ w OI- z op_ Et CD � Q z C� Zw U V DCw W DC Ce m~ >" z0 Q J < a Z wW J f 1 c=n hw- O ¢ I-- V �J u) 0 ( z CD w Z fn W v m � re ow re -' z Q a < Q cn d � � z W � w a w 1 v 5 >- Q Q C) 0 zWD ° Q U ZOU f0 F- aim. Z LLI�C 'a' Ua U n o0Z ° 00 0 Nf � tea- LL ■0. ¢ co O O cW_I Lu O o = W V 00 = w Z Z CD O CL 0 0 m d< h LL W i .� o H O co F- -0 ' �- 0 = W -a >' , W O a Q � . ¢ = 0z I— C 4) o o '= o z LAY Q LL z � — O w = ¢ wF- M 0 m C) CO 0 i (n Z I- n- O ¢ I- WDUL c - W w c-) 00 Lt z0 W o0 = wU F- �C CV El ~ zIll --I • Z U ~ 0 c W Z 0 Z w Z ' ¢ � W f- Cn U c z � F_- wm O o_ > - o Q W OO H zz Q 6 s_ O mco C .- co d W 0 O a c a) 2 -J >- � zE OQ < zw 0 1- � o Ce 0f2K Q z w w = 0 0) . l � fDw W oI- =I- >w = Et 1 mH. }. ¢ o < z z w ° LU COE tw— O ¢ =I- V c) ( � Z > Z w W w ¢ FE = J a. 1 0 & 0 O W �. �� _Iz Q L7 CI � 0 d w � o O Qu) J ¢ ca F- I— ¢ CL Y °' Iw W Qm cn Ce E- _► O , off ¢ wJ Q �� 0I- a" Ccf)IZ 2z 0D0 Q oo W U o 1- \ o o 0 Z m 2 0 �J N w 1-1-1 rip_ I— t� (� o Q w " Qmz 0u) W-I O Q 9 = c 0 00 = '"" 1 in 0m L... w O 0- 0 0 CD E z W 0 W f J Ce m o 4; -6wm 0 op Q 0 ¢ w w � F- L.. 0= W a Q w w ¢ = o z F-- a) o ~ o Z 11- 2 a)� \_ z rx — ¢ 0 O Q w J < E wE m c < 00) C 00ce M= LLU wz c mC° zo w Ioz 1— 1-- ui W cN0 zw J . „„\ O I- ~O g O � z o � z O Z zm W — � 0 s- ¢ w H W E . 2 zt= wm U m Q W CD � °' a � �, = z a ca � r c0m = co C o a) cow 0 a) a a) 0 oz < E ce zw z O OG 0 Et Q z W w V U U O = = w ›- ar- IL F- > -I w = o - 1� CD I__ >,- ¢ o OC T � J za0 W Z w "3 � I 0 < I- V ) CDz >c f� Z � z Q � � Q • < c O LU Ill c •• _ w F- w ¢ 0- CD F- W Wcf) m I e§ f, u) Ce - -J CO c � o¢ o � z o wzwZ fmO W o O � _ -0 cn o I-- 4 � cl; 0o Z � � O ..� z ¢ o zw W c ^ QmZ O OW _I 0 0Ln ¢ F- Li_ W �- � = cn U oo = N N Z Z = 6 0 w - - O � 0 1— CD E , �z ¢ m o Ncn En" ~o00as ' a LLI m 0� � F- c = o �- _ OI -C a -a Q - o w ¢ = Oz Lo woZ Zin o ~ a� z �- w =, ¢ w F m¢ Om ^ m z � o Q N c¢nzF- `"W o °_ Q_ > Lm = CQfa' z o = uj W z I..-, H . Np di = O ZF-- � _I - z I— o� � O 1 UZ 0 cz—nz O Z z W O'-- ¢ w I_' F— W a of= - LIJQ Q O c `03 • d � Q�' z73 = om = m 73 h; O00 o mwm c O >-' oG c' •ai ID z 0) E Q. U < Q Z W s M zw 1- M z 1- D z w = z `, wv V I S a w W e O z = > D J w ~ ID - _ Ci IX < J - cr Z w w _t -t MW 0 c.0 = 0 .ter � 3 f%) z > z `' J m � W wow it .. m _ Wry = J IZ : < 0 o u, p o lam- �' I . w Q z Q wt < t-- a O Y _I M a) t-- w W a w 7 N ' LT zm . cn o , w � Q 0 � ¢ Z Luzw oo = d=0o I -.ZZ ma O V J- N ce cC G ILLL ■— z Q ,J -G `' Q Oz O cwi) J 0 v � mQ t= u '.,� o5:2- 3 �rzw C..) R0 = iu1 o 1-- F-- Ce 0CI) 1"' E "-' W CO z 0 o O c `Z' Uwe L. z .� E -� Q � � Ce wW J .� o 3 zo ¢ 0 LLI � = co VS U d o ¢ mLL 20 1-- p CO u_ W -a s mi-- F-- W � 0 = 6 D � ¢ � oz I- o f- w - Z Q� o � 2Z O w = ¢ WI- 5 --- < 00° M 00 O v O a _ - u m rX 2 O W 0 00 = wco W N 0 I"' z w .__I `) a ) Z U I- o 2 s O owz cmzw 0 E 9 s o E > +D d o EQ W Utz- 0 w -> a 07 = z Q tU c o > C 0 a0 wo >0- a) L J- ›- E �. o0a Q M z Lt CCPC October 15, 2020 One Naples Public Presenters Ken Melkus, Save Vanderbilt Beach, 6 minutes 'zzd.� EXPERTS PRESENTATION: Greg Stuart, Planner T.i Bill Oliver, Traffic Engineer — i `Daniel Trescott, CHHA Expert, icJ,?C. s-N (7,�4,14) TOTALTIME: 58 Minutes Five minutes each: 1. Sara Spector, Esq. (Regatta), Legal iN P6 -3o.4 2. Ralf Brookes, Esq. (Save Vanderbilt Beach), Legal PEw5u4Q 3. Bill Schuman, Spot Zoning 20u 1A 4. Bob Burgess Vacation of Roads/Economic Benefit 2.w vv, 5. Betty Pircio, NIM 6. Mark Efusy, Health and Density I J Psi 7. Cristy Marks, C-3 vs One Naples too,,n 8. Brian Maher, (Board Chair, Trieste), Trieste Issues Zc.1 \ 9. John Bamberger, Setbacks Buzz Victor, President, Save Vanderbilt Beach, 7 minutes 260,,,,, Tony Pires — Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association — 15 minutes r Mr. English — Pelican Bay Property Owners Association — 10 minutes NI n ,StA) Kkn; l \,, 10/14/2020 P Review of One Naples Development Proposal Traffic Issues Regatta Homeowners Association For Collier County Planning Commission October 3, 2020 i 1 Collier County Goals Growth Management Plan Transportation Element Goal #1: To plan for, develop and operate a safe, efficient, and cost-effective transportation system that provides for both the motorized and non-motorized movement of people and goods throughout Collier County. Collier LDC Section 4.07.02.D.3 3. The BCC may lessen density or intensity of development when it has been determined that development to the maximum density or intensity permissible in this section would: a. Create inconvenient or unsafe access to the PUD; or b. Create traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin or lead to the PUD WE O,vu.PE.,LLG 2 1 10/14/2020 Applicant Analysis • Analysis is short-term, not long-term • C3 vs PUD comparison • Applicant's access plan creates an unsafe and congested condition • Technical tool (Synchro/Sim-Traffic) is incapable of analyzing this situation • Other access alternatives not explored • Applicant's "signalization solution" choice not thoroughly vetted Findings/Conclusions are not reliable Not responsive to LDC 4.07.02.8 Pb. LLC 3 C3 vs PUD Comparison Land Use:820 Shopping Center °ascription A slawpiny muter is au integrated troop of commercial establishments Mat Is planned,developed. owned.and managed as a unit.A shnptin©centers rnmn utInn ex neaten to ne market anxa in terms Of min rdcatmh end tvoe dl store A shopping center also provides on-site perking facilities .. - sufficient to serve its own parking demands.Factory outlet center(Land Use 823)is a related use. Additional Dela � K x a Shrft(ang centers.mrd,warg neighborhood centers.community centers.regional centers,and super regional centers,were surveyed for this[and use.Some of these centers contained non merchandising !r'X.. ..irk X3� .t- a^ facilities,such as office buildings,movie theater,restaurants.post offices.banks,health dubs,and Ii xk;*x recreational fealties(for example,oe skating rinks or motor miniature sod courses). i r • '" many shopping renters.in addition to the integrated unit of shops In on•building or enclosed around a mall,include outparcsls(peripheral buildings or pads toasted on the perimeter of the center adjacent to the streets end major access points).These buildings are "''"'" iidO'�` typically drive-in banks,retail stores,restaurants,or small offices.Although the data herein •;";_*A'214 do not Indicate which of the centime studied included peripheral buildings.it can be assumed that some of the data show their effect. W E.Owlet:RICIONJ 4 2 10/14/2020 Applicant Analysis • Analysis is short-term, not long-term • C3 vs PUD comparison • Applicant's access plan creates an unsafe and congested condition • Technical tool (Synchro/Sim-Traffic) is incapable of analyzing this situation • Other access alternatives not explored • Applicant's "signalization solution" choice not thoroughly vetted Findings/Conclusions are not reliable Not responsive to LDC 4.07.02.E 5 Five Existing Traffic Issues • Congestion at parking garage entrance • Inadequate quantity of public parking • Heavy pedestrian and bike traffic • Pedestrians/bikes/motor vehicle conflicts • Egress from nearby properties (north side of VBR, Gulf Shore to US 41), now difficult, is worsened Opportunities to improve the above are being missed b 3 10/14/2020 Existing Access to Parking Garage ifpo . -10*01 01-18-2020 10:25:57 AM 7 Five Existing Traffic Issues • Congestion at parking garage entrance • Inadequate quantity of public parking • Heavy pedestrian and bike traffic • Pedestrians/bikes/motor vehicle conflicts • Egress from nearby properties (north side of VBR, Gulf Shore to US 41), now difficult, is worsened Opportunities to improve the above are being missed s 4 10/14/2020 Beach Walk Circuity wwAA �7lAli►in4'ielt�`r-17471i1JMEitl4 7rwic.r.orawuIt t .A. rA•;7;04- .4" ' (®airRYe= ,+,,x.p, 1c.r ., s.•: ...s . • ...t s 00PP �... NO..Q , •': 'wall 04.1'....Fsi ', ''rs • 1 • s • e�tr.. •a •, .... f. rr i „.. ♦.. .�! V. f..„ •, ...., .......1-7+ . ;r ,.r t ri m q r: f 424,i.,, • .,• •• c___• _____ - -pi:4_ „.4 '4"p4 Q� i ^�h 4Y y P n. cgteN ' , l t r wOfit #4 iI� r L ,t 1 L 9 Solution on the Table Widen South Bay Dr • Does not increase parking `r Build sidewalk .� - • New leg at parking 1 .c ` garage adds Signalize . - .. ,.,. ..� ;= vehicle/pedestrian 11 intersection ";' 'll �J:- and pedestrian A t — conflicts movements, Add new leg to ,,. • Does not address ' add RT lane intersection nearby property egress . • Extenda , 1 �,,r �'- pathway � • Signalized intersection NW ,, creates unnecessary ``r delay t • County forfeits right- ' ) . of-way butgets little in Improve Parking 1 -_ y 1 Garage Entry _.... .. ... 4H ; return T i e WE Ouvea PE..LLC 10 5 10/14/2020 Unsafe, Congested Access at Parking Garage • Existing 3-Leg Intersection • Proposed 4-Leg Intersection —Three Issues for WB Left —Six+ Issues for SB Left It Opposing traffic 1► Bikes and pedestrians f••••• �....� Bikes and pedestrians Parking Entry —0 4- Opposing WB traffic Opposing EB traffic TO Bikes and pedestrians 4••••i Parking Entry Complicated, Unusual= Unsafe 11 Opportunity — Improve County Garage Entry Distribution of Existing Ticket Spitter Service Time Distribution Parking Entrance Service Times ror ;ar •. ima 2 t 3 4<m >30`, .1.111. I..I1.0...1 '' ; _ 1 1 1 . _ _ 0 .-2 2 4L 68 3,10.0-12 42-.4 14a16 L613 1320 20 22 22,24 r v.. _ Ctry in10015eConds Entry and payment method will reduce queues — but by how much? 12 6. 10/14/2020 Applicant Solution "+25%" l ip - ate. , '. .1„,.. 1111 ' 1) - '4 - . . . } e."4... l v I -f'-ron mien` 1 i _,-1•-; ,F. c vra PE LLC 13 Consider the Future • The beach will not move • County population expected to grow by 35% over 25 years • Demand for beach will grow • Beach resources are finite and limited • Per MPO, traffic on VBR expected to increase by 25% • Signage effectiveness is limited - those determined to go to beach will go - will park in neighborhoods or stand in street - opportunities to create additional parking are limited . F. ): .e; PE l.LC 14 7 10/14/2020 Alternative Circulation Solution Widen • Create alternate route for vehicles away South Bay Dr from vulnerable traffic—shift vehicular -- traffic to South Bay Dr. Build sidewalk • Promotes walkable environment near >'"' beach—opportunity to develop"sense of place" 1' ,� at • Develop vehicular site access from 1 Create South Bay Dr. ''' W monumental No new leg to Extend 8' roundabout • Create monumental roundabout at intersection pathway 4,_ South Bay Dr.—great aesthetics,does t - not require electricity in aftermath of f'1 • '.�� • ' storms --to • Improves egress for nearby properties • Safer No traffic signal A Mit,— Improve Parking a mi -w. • Drivers incur less delay Garage Entry '--' ...' ' ' Pedestrian-Favored Zone C,'—_ > Motor Vehicle Zone -Ai. '",,,eex PE LLC 15 Alternative Circulation Solution - .; • �� �� y ; ,s:kiptivild If! yea iii - — • ,i:'' -44 V.t•i' • ‘.., ,.... . 4)4' I Pt :if I 16 8 10/14/2020 Recommendation Deny because Transportation Element Goal #1 and LDC 4.07.02.D.3 not met: • Inadequate public infrastructure — parking • Unsafe, congestion-generating access plan • Inadequate consideration of potentially safer, more effective alternatives 17 9 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning &Design Services EXHIBITS CASE_THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING&STREET VACATION PREPARED FOR _SAVE VANDERBILT BEACH Exhibit One _ Greg Stuart, MAURP Qualifications and Experience Exhibit Two _ The One Naples Site Highest & Best Use Exhibit Three _ The Adjacent Neighborhood Density, Building Height & Setbacks Exhibit For Neighborhood Complementary and Compatibility Analysis Exhibit Four A Complementary and Compatibility Assessment Between Site C-3 Zoning and Proposed MUPD Exhibit Five Regulatory Framework & Key Collier County Rules and Definitions For Approval Exhibit Six The One Naples Collier County Growth Management Plan Internal Consistency Assessment Exhibit Seven Street Vacation Value and Applicant Benefit Assessment Exhibit Eight _ The One Naples Plan Amendment & Rezoning Exhibit Nine Required Compatibility Standards and Polices 10/10/2020 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning&Design Services Exhibit One Greg Stuart, MAURP Qualifications & Experience Case_The One Naples GMP Map Amendment, MUPD Rezoning&Street Vacation STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning&Design Services 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 Greg Stuart 97 Riverfront Drive Cashmere, WA 98815 C 239-677-6126 LAND PLANNER/URBAN DESIGN PRINCIPAL Greg@Stuarturbondesign.com Professional Expertise in Comprehensive Land Use Planning, Urban Design, www.Stuarturbandesign.com Land Development Entitlements, Project Management, Expert Planning Testimony and Real Estate Investment and Development PROFILE Mr. Stuart is a highly experienced professional land use planner& executive with over three+decades of experience and success in urban QUALIFICATIONS AND &regional planning, land development&finance, entitlements, EXPERTISE regulatory development, governmental relations and communications. Comprehensive Land Use Planning EXPERIENCE VP, Stuart and Marquez, Gainesville/Jacksonville, FL 1984—1990 Planning,Zoning and Growth Director of Planning, Hole Montes&Ass, Fort Myers, FL 1990- 1992 Management President, Stuart and Associates, Fort Myers, FL 1993-current Senior Principal, Eagle Real Estate, Cape Coral, FL 1998-2008 Land Use and Market Feasibility Senior Principal, Southland Group, Bonita Springs, FL 2009—2011 Analysis Senior Associates, RW Thorpe&Associates, Mercer Island,WA 2016 Site Planning, Urban Design and & Comprehensive Land Use Planning,Zoning & Sector Planning Environmental Design Broad experience in growth management, governmental relations, land use analysis, long range planning and regulatory implementation. Local, State and Federal Land Notable accomplishments include the Bonita Springs 5200 ac. Sector Development Permitting & Plan,the Matlacha SF Residential Overlay, the 2015 Pine Island Plan Entitlements Restudy&TUD Ordinance, and Lee Co. Comprehensive Plan oversight via 10-year Local Planning Agency member(5 yr. Chairman). Land Development&Marina Development Project Management Administration and Business Management Noted for team-oriented business management methods; expertise in budgets, finance, strategic planning, governmental relations, public Real Estate Investment, Finance communications, contracts and negotiations. Business background and Underwriting gained from owning and/or being a senior partner for 4 profitable consulting &real estate development/investment practices. Governmental Relations and Public Communications Urban Design, Entitlements and Public Communications Highly recognized for consensus oriented public and agency permitting Expert Testimony implementation (80+cases), environmental design, local, state& federal entitlements and project implementation. Notable examples include the Suwannee Trails Camp Resort, Treehouse Village, Judd Creek Preserve PD, Bonita Springs Home Depot& Heritage Cove RPD. Land Development, Project Management & Real Estate Successful track record in land development, including acquisition, financial analysis&project management; notable$236MM 20-month concurrent design, permitting and construction for 3 FL marinas. Professional Planning Expert Testimony Mr. Stuart is an acknowledged leading expert in Land Use Planning, Condemnation and Inverse Condemnation,with over 130 Judicial& Quasi-judicial cases; successfully defended Lee County in a$74MM inverse condemnation mine case. ACADEMIC BACKGROUND AND CREDENTIALS Danish Academy of Fine Arts, College of Architecture& Urban Design; Post-graduate Fellow University of Florida, Masters of Arts in Urban&Regional Planning,full HUD Scholarship University of Florida, Bachelor of Arts in Urban Studies,Magna Cum Laude • Awarded HUD Planning Fellowship for Full Graduate Studies, University of Florida • Awarded Denmark International Studies Fellowship, University of Copenhagen • Awarded Graduate Design Fellowship, Danish Academy of Arts PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Fort Myers Board of Realtors,Associate Urban Land Institute,Associate American Planning Association,Associate STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning&Design Services Greg Stuart SUMMARY Mr. Stuart is a highly experienced urban planner and designer,with experience gained from two professional consulting practices anc a senior Principal in 2 real estate investment and brokerage firms. With extensive expertise in land development, business management and public communications, his expertise includes urban design, land use planning, land development permitting, project management and expert testimony. Earning a B.A in Urban Studies(High Honors), a M.A. in Urban& Regional Planning from the University of Florida, and a Fellowship at the Danish Royal Academy, Mr. Stuart has extensive legislative, quasi-judicial and growth management case experience throughout Florida and Washington State. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE Mr. Stuart's professional experience spans thirty plus years of local, regional and international professional business and consulting. Mr. REPRESENTATIVE Stuart has directed land use planning, design, permitting and project management tasks for public and private sector interests, has been the CLIENT LIST Principal Planner or Project Manager for more than 80 major development projects throughout FL, GA and WA, and has provided The Geo Group, Inc. expert testimony for over 130 quasi-judicial&judicial cases. Sakata Seed Of North America Comprehensive Land Use Planning and Sector Planning Mr. Stuart has designed and directed scores of land use planning Davis Wright Tremaine projects, such as the mixed-use 196-ac. Judd Creek Preserve Stephans&Klinge, LLP residential projects(Cape Coral FL 2003-2006), recreational vehicle resorts(Director of Development, the Suwannee Trails Camp Resort(a City of Vero Beach 2800-acre 6-mile riverfront DRI, 1985-88), and institutional mixed use projects(Project Manager/Principal Planner for the 6,400-ac. Pine Lee County, FL Creek Ranch and FGCU Charlotte County Campus 2004-08). Public Collier Co., FL sector comprehensive planning includes directing/designing the Bonita Springs 5200 ac. NE Quadrant Sector Plan,various EAR and Lee Plan City of Cape Coral, FL amendments, NW Cape Coral&7 Island Plan (2014),the 2015 Pine City of Bonita Springs Island Plan Restudy&TDU Ordinance revision, &the Matlacha SF Residential Overlay ordinance. As a Lee County Planning Town of Fort Myers Beach, FL Commissioner(1992-02; 5 yr. Chairman) under his leadership, the County adopted new rules for commercial architectural design, upgraded Ingman Marine the landscaping code, implemented electronic signs regulatory reform, Pulte Homes executed concurrency management ordinance reform and strengthened disclosure practices. Other notable achievements include community Lennar US Homes sector planning review and standards, co-directing the County/FGCU 50-meter Pool Inter-local Agreement with $4.7MM matching funding, Home Depot Corp. Ronto Development Corp. Land Development & Real Estate As a principle in the Southland Group, he directed/managed over 3 Realmark Properties, Inc. dozen underwriting, finance and restructuring real estate development Carroll Properties/Gulf Star Marine projects, including the Gulf Coast Health Park. As a principle with Eagle Realty of SW FL he directed a$365MM private investment Yacht Clubs of the Americas, LLC portfolio featuring up to 16 assets throughout FL. He was responsible for the acquisition, syndication and funding for the Telegraph Creek University of Florida Foundation Ranch,the Hendry County River Ranch,Judd Creek and 13 other development and real estate investment projects. As a partner and Ingman Marine project manager he was co-responsible for finance, entitlements and Banks Engineering project management for a$236MM 3 bundled marina project(YCOA Tampa, Naples, Key West; 2004-2008). He co-directed the YCOA Knott Consoer PA business plan, debt and equity raise, project design, construction and Select Real Estate of SW FL operations and successfully met the challenge of simultaneous permitting and construction for 3 marina resorts in 20 months. PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS • Appointed Chairman, Lee County Local Planning Agency(1992--2002) • Appointed as a Director,the Real Estate Investment Society(1994—1997) • Appointed as a Director,the Economic Development Coalition (1996- 1997) • Appointed to the Lee County Land Development Code Advisory Committee(1996) • Appointed to the Lee County School Boards Construction Advisory Committee(1991) • Appointed to Lee County's Affordable Housing Committee(1992) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning&Design Services Greg Stuart QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE(cont.) NOTABLE QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCES Mr. Stuart's land development and real estate experience includes acquisition analysis and feasibility, financial underwriting, contracts and asset • Successfully directed and/or was dispensation. the senior planning principal for over 130+quasi-judicial and judicial planning and land use Planning,Zoning and Urban Design Mr. Stuart designed, planned, permitted and directed Treehouse Village, a cases throughout FL&Seattle. multifamily residential development; awarded the City of Gainesville's • Un.of Washington College of Outstanding Residential Development Award. Principal Planner and/or Business featured speaker on Project Manager responsible for planning, design and permitting for the development&finance(2017). Hancock Creek Estates and Tuscan Pointe waterfront residential • Authored the Planning&Land Use subdivisions(North Fort Myers), Stuart Harbor Yacht Club(Stuart, FL), and Certified Coastal Practitioner Realmark Development's Estates at Entrada, the Tucker Grade mixed use Credentialing Program for the projects. He was responsible for the planning and permitting of five interstate Coastal Zone Foundation(2018) highway commerce centers, including the Bonita Grande CPD,the Estero • Authored the 2016 NW Cape Coral Interstate Commerce Park at Corkscrew Rd. the Stock Development's Sector Plan,with emphasis on Vintage Commerce Center and Alico Crossroads CPD in Lee County. economic&environmental systems Land Development, Entitlements & Project Management integration. Notable land development residential projects include Lennar US Homes • Successfully defended Lee Co.in a Heritage Cove(Ft. Myers), and the Pinnacle Oaks PUD Charlotte Harbor $74MM inverse land use waterfront project. Commercial retail center entitlement and project condemnation case(RCH v. Lee, management experience is illustrated by the Bonita Springs Home Depot 2011). Center, a 240,000 SF retail center, Miromar Factory Shops, a 700,000 SF • Co-authored the Greater Pine regional outlet mall,the Estero Greens/Sam Galloway Dealership, a Island Community Plan and 229,000 SF. commercial shopping center(1996), and Sierra Meadows, a awarded the 2016 FPZA Award for 300 unit, 260,000 commercial SF Naples mixed use activity center. He directed various environmental permitting tasks, including the Bonita Grande Outstanding Environmental CPD Kehl Canal Flow Way restoration and enhancement, Key West YCOA Plan/Study. riparian rights transfer and mangrove conservation and North Trail RV • As the Senior Principal for Eagle Resort. He was co-project manager and responsible for redesigning and Realty of SW FL,directed,planned amending the Timberland and Tiburon DRI,the Parker Lakes DRI, and and entitled a$365MM real estate environmental permitting for the Tamalico Center, a 600,000 sq. ft. land portfolio(1999—2008). commercial-industrial DRI. He was responsible for numerous rezoning and • Effectively co-directed a$226MM comprehensive plan amendments, including the Summerlin Park CPD and three marina resort redevelopment the Casa Del Mar RPD. He was responsible for obtaining a precedent project(YCOA Tampa,Naples and setting park impact fee reduction for the 235-acre Parker Lakes, saving the Key West;2005-2008). client over$250,000 in development exactions. Throughout these project's • Responsible for the planning and Mr. Stuart was responsible agent representation and public communications and negotiations with environmental organizations and civic and design for over 500 site plans, neighborhood associations. urban designs and master development plans,including the Professional Planning Expert and Testimony award winning Treehouse Village He is a recognized authority on growth management, land use planning and (1986). urban design; selected as the featured speaker(National Conference on • Planning,permitting and project Growth Management, San Diego ASCE; Un. Of Washington College of management for 6 Lee County, FL Business& Real Estate), extensively quoted press and electronic media interstate interchange commercial throughout Southwest Florida and a ten-year former County Planning centers(1995—2005). Commissioner. Mr. Stuart has been the lead expert land use planning • witness in over 120 judicial and quasi-judicial,with successful testimony in a Designed,planned,entitled and variety of cases such as the RCH v. Lee Co.,a$74MM inverse obtained the first and only condemnation mine case, Kline v. Fort Myers Beach substantive due Development of Regional Impact process case, the City of Redmond v. Union Shares inverse condemnation approval along the Suwannee case, the Estero Group v. Lee inverse condemnation mine case, the River(Suwannee Trails Camp Suwannee River Camp Resort Chapter 120 Administrative Appeal, Lee Co. Resort 1985—1887). v. Dahlke a Chapter 120 FLUM Amendment Appeal, the Three Oaks Parkway v.Corlico ROW condemnation case, Caribbean Beach Club v. Allstate Insurance coastal reconstruction build back settlement and Flanagan v. FL DEP coastal construction line variance administrative hearing case. STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning&Design Services Greg Stuart, MUP -- Expert Planning Judicial & Quasi-judicial Testimony Case List • 725 Azalea v. City of Vero Beach;2020 Case 19-5531GM, Public Sector Defense DOAH Hearing FLUM Amendment; Vero Beach, FL. • Geo Group, Inc. v. City of Tacoma;2019 Case 3:18-cv-05233, Private Sector Down Zoning & Takings US District Court Western District; Tacoma, WA. • Sakata Seed Corporation v. Lee Co.; 2019 Case# 19-3848GM Private Sector Plaintiff DOAH Hearing FLUM Amendment; Fort Myers, FL • Topps Center CPD;2019 20190027, Private Sector Hotel Zoning & MCP Entitlement; Town of Fort Myers Beach, FL • Oak Villages RPD;2019 DC12017-00010, Private Sector MF Residential Zoning Entitlement; Fort Myers, FL • The Pratt Place RPD; 2019 DC12018-00008, Private Sector Zoning Entitlement Testimony, Lee Co., FL. • The Baumgarten MPUD;2019 PL20170000768, Private Sector Land Use Zoning Compatibility Testimony, Collier Co., FL. • Southland Lakes Investors Request For Judicial Notice; 2019 18-CA-000268, Plaintiff Injunction and Highest and Best Use Testimony, Lee Co., FL. • Lake Sammamish Mediation;2019 Plaintiff Highest and Best Use Testimony, King County, WA • Alico 254 Parcels G, H, I& J MPD Amendment; 2018 DC12017-00001, Private Sector Zoning Entitlement, Lee Co., FL • Treeline 28 Commercial Park; 2018 DCI2017-00011, Private Sector Zoning Entitlement, Lee Co., FL • Embers Parkway Future Land Use Map Amendment; LU17-0008, Private Sector Land Use Map Amendment Entitlement, Cape Coral, FL • Kline v Fort Myers Beach; 2017 CA 16-CA-001866, Substantive Due Process Defense of Town of Fort Myers Beach • Appeal of Official Interpretation; 2017 INTP-2017-PL-1233, Private Sector Permit Interpretation For Appellant, Collier Co., FL • Gulf Star Marina Renovation; DC12009-00061, 2017 Private Sector PD Zoning, Lee Co. • Bonita Breeze CPD; PD16-31234-BOS, 2017 Private Sector Zoning, the City of Bonita Springs • 21421 Widgeon Terrace;VAR16-0012 2017 Private Sector Variance; Town of Fort Myers Beach • Morris Irrevocable Family Trust vs. Pacific Coast Coal Co., Inc.; 2016 Demand For Arbitration, Private Sector Litigation, King County, WA • The City of Redmond vs. Union Shares, LLC; 2016#15-2-12698-9 SEA, Private Sector Condemnation Defense and Counterclaim, Redmond, WA • Mark Freeman, Richard Bennett Land Trust, Brinker Brown, & D&D Machine & Hydraulics, Inc. vs. Lee Co.; 2015 12-CA-2517 Inverse Condemnation & Bert Harris in defense of Lee Co., FL • The Commons Club Administrative Appeal of Permit Denial; 2015, REZ COM 15-20639, Private Sector Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • Gasparilla Marine Sales CPD Rezoning; 2014, DCI 2015-00009, Private Sector Zoning, Lee Co., _ FL • The Restaurant Depot Rezoning; 2015, REZ 2015-00002, Quasi-judicial Private Sector Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Estero Group LTD v. Lee Co.; 2014 12-CA-1705 Inverse Condemnation & Bert Harris, Lee Co. Defense, Lee Co., FL • Grandezza Home Owners Association v. Miromar Lakes, LLC 2013/14; DC12013-00008 Private Sector Quasi-judicial Zoning Appeal for the POA, Lee Co., FL • Carter-Pritchett v. Lee Co. 2014/15; 12-CA-002517 Floodway Inverse Condemnation & Bert Harris, Lee Co. Defense, Lee Co., FL • Bermuda Lakes RVPD; 2014, DC12014-00010, Quasi-judicial Private Sector Zoning, Lee Co. • Westgate Center IPD; 2014, DC12014-00001, Quasi-judicial Private Sector Zoning, Lehigh Acres, FL • Huffmaster Easement Condemnation; 2014, Public Sector Pre-condemnation Analysis for Lee STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning&Design Services Co., FL, North Fort Myers, FL • MiromarLakes v. Grandezza; 2013, DR12013-00021 & DC12013-00008, Private Sector DRI & NOI, Estero, FL • Lee Co. v. Weiman; 09CA-5705T 2013, Condemnation, Lee Co. Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • McGuiqun v. Lee Co.; 09-CA-005689 2013, Riparian Rights and Inverse Condemnation, Lee Co. Defense, San Carlos Island, FL • Lee Co. v. McCoy; 2013, Condemnation, Lee Co. Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • Orange Grove Center CPD; 2012, DCI 2012-00023, Private Sector CPD Amendment; Lee Co., FL • RCH v. Lee County; 10-CA-002364 Inverse Condemnation & Bert Harris; 2011 Lee Co. _ Defense, Lee Co., FL • C. Johnson SF Rezoning; 2012, REZ 2011-00007, Private Sector Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Lee County Burnt Store Road; #06A-939, Parcel 123 ROW Condemnation; 2009/2011, Lee Co. Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • Dahlke v. Lee County 2009, 08-CA-419, Fort Myers Beach Inverse Condemnation, FL, Ch 120 Appeal, Lee Co. Defendant, Fort Myers Bch. FL • Caribbean Beach Club; 2009, 06-CA-004562 Development and Construction Private Party Litigation, Fort Myers Bch., FL • Three Oaks Parkway; 2008, 06A-939; ROW Condemnation, Lee Co. Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • Three Oaks Parkway Corlico; 2008, 05CA-4770 2008, ROW Condemnation Lee Co. Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • Collier County vs. Flick-County Barn Road Parcel 124; 2008, #60101, ROW Condemnation, Collier Co. Plaintiff, Collier Co., FL • Collier County vs. Graziani, et.al.Parcels 134, 135 and 136; 2008, #62081, ROW Condemnation, Collier Co. Plaintiff, Collier Co., FL • Alico Crossroads CPD Amendment; 2007, DCI 2008-0000, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL -- • Tuscan Pointe RPD; 2006, DC12008-00088, Private Sector RPD Zoning, North Ft. Myers, FL • Thompson Variance; 2004/05, VAR 2005-00018, Private Sector Variance and Appeal, Pine Island, FL • Hendry Co. River Ranch; 2004/05, Private Sector Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Hendry Co., FL • Hancock Creek Estates RPD; 2004, DC12005-00063, Private Sector RPD Zoning, North Fort Myers, FL • Vintage Commerce Center CPD Amendment; 2004, DC12004-00065, Private Sector CPD Zoning, South Fort Myers, FL • Pinnacle Oaks PUD; 2004, PA-04-05-16-LS, Private Sector FLUM Amendment and PUD Zoning; Charlotte Co., FL • Kelly Carlos; 2004/2005, Lee Co., FL, Private Sector Contract Litigation Support, South Fort Myers, FL • FDOT v. Fleck Alico LLC.; 2004, Fort Myers, FL, Private Sector Interchange ROW Condemnation, Lee Co. FL • Collier Co. v. Ruth.; 2004, #41825480000, Collier Co., FL, ROW Condemnation • Englewood SR 776 Right of Way; 2004, Private Sector ROW Condemnation, Charlotte Co., FL, • Estates At Entrada RPD; 2004, DC12004-00080, Private Sector Zoning, North Fort Myers, FL, • Tucker Grade; FLUM Amendment; 2004, PA-04-05-20-LS, Private Sector Residential and Commercial Map Amendment, Charlotte Co, FL • Fitzgerald 108-Acre Land Use Amendment; 2004, CPA2004-04, Private Sector Land Use Map &Text Amendment, Lee Co., FL, • The Murdock Town Center Case; 2003, Parcels 1026, 931, 290, 167, 169, 206, 237, 308, 311, Private Sector Land Condemnation, Charlotte Co., FL • Marvel CG Zoning; 2003, REZ 2003-00017, Private Sector Zoning, Fort Myers, FL, • Vanderbilt Condemnation; 2003, Collier Co., FL, ROW Condemnation Support, Collier Co., FL • Flanagan v. FDEP; 2003 #07-CA-000474, Private Sector CCL Appeal, Captiva, FL STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning&Design Services • Longwood Villas RPD; 2002/2003, DC12002-00065, RPD Zoning and RPD Zoning Amendment, Lee Co., FL • Judd Creek; 2003, #LU03-01000027, Private Sector Annexation and Large Scale Land Use Map Amendment, Cape Coral, FL • IAD Capital Corp.,2003, REZ2004-00011, Private Sector Light Industrial Zoning, North Fort Myers, FL • Heritage Lakes Annexation and FLUM; 2003, 09-26-2003, Private Sector FLUM Large Scale Amendment and Annexation, Fort Myers, FL • City Mattress CPD; 2002, DC12003-00021, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Bonita Springs, FL • River Ranch 508; 2002, CPA-04-06, Private Large Scale Map Amendment, Hendry Co., FL • Storgard IPD; 1998/2002, Z-98-032, Private Sector IPD Zoning &Amendments, Lee Co., FL • Longwood Villas RPD, 2002, DIC2002-00065, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Alico Crossroads CPD; 2002, DC12002-00052, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Corkscrew Mine IPD Amendment; 2002, DC12002-00066, Private Sector IPD Mine Amendment, Lee Co., FL • Estero Pointe CPD; 2002, DC12002-00039, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Estero, FL • SR 776 47 Amendment; 2002, #0070384-000000-9, Private Sector Large Scale FLUM Amendment and CG Zoning, Charlotte Co., FL • Paradise Woods RS-1; 2002, REZ2002-00004, Private Sector Residential Zoning, Bonita Springs, FL, • Geraci vs. Lee County Port Authority; 2001, Private Sector Land Condemnation, Lee Co., FL • Hiding Park RPD; 2001, Z-96-073, Private Sector RPD Zoning and Amendments, Lee Co., FL • Winkler Reserve RPD; 2001, DCI 2002-00012, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Renaissance Executive Center, 2001, #REZ2001-00015, SEZ2001-00017, Private Sector Zoning and Special Exception, Lee Co., FL • Bonita Beach Village CPD; 2001/1999, ADD 2001-00073, PD-99-034, Private Sector CPD Zoning and Rezoning (Home Depot), Bonita Springs, FL • T&T DRI/MPD Amendment; 2001, DCI2001-00062, Private Sector DRI Amendment and RPD Rezoning, Estero, FL • Crystal Commerce Center lPD; 2001, DCI2001-00039, Private Sector IPD Zoning, Fort Myers, FL, • Alico Commons CPD, 2001, DC12000-00090, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Parker Plaza Office Park CPD; 2001, #DC12001-00048, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Fort Myers, FL • Harbor Ridge RPD; 2001, DC12001-00026, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL, • Corkscrew Growers Sec. 3 RPD/CPD; 2000, DCI2000-00070, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Bonita Grande CPD; 2000/2008, ORD 08-09, Private Sector CPD Zoning and Appeal, Bonita Springs, FL, • Edison Village PUD; 2000, PUD-2000-15, Private Sector Commercial PUD Zoning, Collier Co., FL, • SR 776 58, 2000, PA-00-11-44LS, Private Sector Large Scale Commercial Map Amendment and CG Zoning, Charlotte Co., FL • Riverplace of Estero MUPD; 2000, DC12000-00064, Private Sector MUPD Zoning, Estero, FL • Storgard IPD; 1999/1997/1995# 95-07-258.03Z.02.01, Private Sector IPD Zoning and Amendment, Lee Co, FL • Sierra Meadows PUD; 1997/1999, PUD-94-01, Private Sector Mixed Use PUD Zoning, Collier Co., FL • Estero Interstate Commerce Park CPD; 1999, #99-08-241.03Z01.01, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Estero, FI, • GM Pine Island Small Scale Map Amendment; Appeal 1999, #99-2047GM, Private SectorFLUM Appeal & Ch. 120, Pine Island, FL • Springs Plaza Mini-warehouse SE; 1995/99, 95-01-031.01S 01.01, Private Sector Special Exception, Bonita Springs, FL, • Airport Autopark CPD; 1999, # 99-04-324.03Z 01.01, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning&Design Services • Massey Building CPD; 1999, Private Sector Minor CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • The P, R, C& M PUD; 1999, #99-07, Private Sector PUD Zoning, Collier Co., FL • The Shores at Gulf Harbour DRI Amendment; 1999, Private Sector DRI#12-8182-21, Lee Co., FL • Bonita Gateway CPD, 1998, #99-10-093.03Z 01.01, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Bonita Springs, FL • Vintage Commerce Center CPD, 1998, #99-06-355.03Z, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Vincentian PUD; 1998, R-97-8, Private Sector Mixed Use Zoning, Collier Co., FL • Kristen Woods RPD/CPD, 1998, # 98-08-067.03Z 01.01, Private Sector RPD & CPD Zoning, Estero, FL • Corkscrew Palms CPD; 1997, #97-08-132.03Z 01.01, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Estero, FL • Flordeco IPD; 1997, #97-05-181.03Z 01.01, Private Sector IPD Zoning, North Fort Myers, FL • Florida Rock IPD; 1996, Private Sector IPD Amendment, Lee Co., FL • Keith Miller Old US 41 Condemnation; 1997, Private Sector ROW Condemnation, Lee Co., FL • Eagle Stringfellow Amendment, 1998, PAM 98-01, Private Sector FLUM Amendment, Pine Island, FL • Estero Greens CPD; 1997, 97-04-065-03Z, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Estero, FL • The Plaza LLC vs. Lee County; 1996, Private Sector Colonial Prky. ROW Condemnation, Fort Myers, FL • Carissa CPD; 1996, #96-12-014.03Z 01.01, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Heritage Cove RPD; 1996, #98-02-064.03Z, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Char-Lee Mine PD, 1995, Private Sector PUD Mine Zoning, Charlotte Co., FL, • The Palmetto Point Property Owners Ass. Vs. Lee Co; 1995, Private Sector ROW Condemnation, Lee Co., FL • Lee Co. vs. The State Of Florida DCA; 1995, Public Sector FL Administrative Appeal, Lee Co., FL • T&T DRI Amendment/Miromar Outlet Mall CPD; 1994/95, Private Sector DRI Amendment and CPD Zoning, Estero, FL, • Casa Del Mar RPD; 1992, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Florida Rock Sand Mine; 1991, Private Sector, Ag. SE Zoning, Glades Co. • Tamalico Center, 1991, Private Sector Commercial DRI Amendment, Lee Co., FL • Summerlin Park CPD; 1991, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Timberland and Tiburon; 1991/1992, Private Sector Mixed Use DRI Amendment and RPD/CPD Zoning, Estero, FL • The Old St. Augustine Road ROW Condemnation, 1989, Private Sector ROW Condemnation, Duval Co., FL • North Florida Regional Medical Center, 1987/1989, DRI Amendment, CON &Zoning, Gainesville, FL • Suwannee Trails Camp Resort LLC vs. DCA, 1988, Private Sector Ch. 120 Administrative Appeal, Hamilton Co., FL • Suwannee Trails Camp Resort DRI, 1986/1987, Private Sector DRI &Zoning, Hamilton Co., FL • Orange Blossom Gardens AMDA/DRI, 1987, Private Sector DRI & Chapter 120 Appeal, Lake Co., FL • Treehouse Village PD, 1986, Private Sector MF Residential PUD, Gainesville, FL STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning&Design Services Greg Stuart, MUP - Representative Real Estate Analysis and Underwriting 2009 to 2017 2017: East Las Olas; $1.75MM Syndication 2011: Hospitality Fund; $75MM Specialized Opportunity Fund 2011: Challenger Driving Range, Estero, FL; $300,000 Offering 2011: Mercy Hospital Lakes Campus, Des Moines, Iowa; financing 2011: Hospitality Specialists Bundled Portfolio, Grand Rapids, MI; partnership buyout 2011: Port Labelle Sports Car Club,Hendry Co., FL; real estate workout and development 2011: Willow Gate Trails Subdivision, South Bend, IN; real estate workout and development 2011: Brookside Waterfront Mixed Use, Naples, FL; real estate workout planning 2011: Residence Inn Hotel, Moline, IL 2011: Wood River Landing Commercial Center, Wood River, IL 2011: Swaney Napes Hotels, Naples, FL 2011: Eastgate Commerce Park, Fort Myers, FL; $2.7MM refinancing 2011: Gulf Coast Health Center, Fort Myers, FL; $10MM workout and restructuring plan 2011: Creekside Mixed Use Development: Gahanna, OH 2010: Seven Bundled Residential Development Projects, Auburn Hills, MI and Canton, MI; 386 SF lots, $4.86MM Offering 2010: Southland Lakes Commerce Park, Fort Myers, FL 2010: Oak Station Retail Center, Marianna, FL; 175,000 SF $6.95MM Shopping Center Offering 2010: Gulf Coast Health Park, Fort Myers, FL 2010: Kings Highway Packing House, Arcadia, FL 2010: Windsor Way Apartments, Naples, FL 2010: West Cypress The Learning Center, Estero, FL 2010: Treeline Preserve Retail Center, Fort Myers, FL 2010: The Vines Highway Commercial Parcel, Fort Myers, FL 2010: Sunset Point Resort, Bocas Del Torro, Panama 2010: Sunbelt Warehouse, Fort Myers, FL 2010: Sikeston Outlet Mall, Sikeston, MO 2010: University Parkway Medical Tract, Sarasota, FL 2010: Grandezza Golf Course, Estero, FL 2010: Sanorini Mixed Use Development, Estero, FL 2010: Punta Loros Resort Tract, Costa Rica 2010: Oakwood Apartments, Jacksonville, FL 2010: Hilton Garden Inn, Plymouth, MI 2010: HFS Medical Office Fund, $20MM Specialized Fund 20'10: Eastlinks Flex Space, Fort Myers, FL 20'10: ykes Everett Mine, Orange Co., FL 2009: Walker Club Apartments, Vero Beach, FL 2009: Tuscany Villas Apartments, Brandon, FL 2009: Village of Teguesta ACLF, Tequesta, FL 2009: Sugar Mills Apartments, Melbourne, FL 2009: Sterling Crest Apartments, Orlando, FL 2009: Sandpiper Cover Apartments, Boynton Beach, FL 2009: Lynn Mann 8.6 Commercial Tract, Fort Myers, FL 2009: Casey Key Marina, Sarasota, FL 2009: Brookside Marina, Naples, FL 2009: Bonita Exchange Interstate Commerce Park, Bonita Springs, FL 2009: Black Bear Residential, Naples, FL STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning&Design Services Greg Stuart, MUP - Real Estate Analysis, Acquisition, Development and Dispensation Project List 2010—2012: Gulf Coast Health Park; $22MM Specialty Institutional Mixed Use Development Project, Lee Co, FL. Investment Plan Development, Analysis, Entitlements and Implementation. 2004—08: Bayshore Interstate 41: $10.4MM Interstate Commerce Development Project, Lee Co., FL. Acquisition, Debt and Equity Raise, Syndication, Underwriting, Project Management, Entitlements and Brokerage. 2005-08: YCOA; $236MM Three Marina Development Project; capitalization For 3 Tampa, Naples and Key West, FL. Marinas; Debt and Equity Raise, Project Management, Oversight and Direction For Principal Partner. -- 2003-2007: Burnt Store Lakes: $20.1MM Acreage Assembly Residential Development Project; Cape Coral, FL. Project Analysis, Underwriting, Syndication, Marketing & Brokerage. 2004-2007: Pinecreek Ranch; $94MM Land Investment Project, Charlotte Co., FL. Acquisition, Debt and Equity Raise, Syndication, Underwriting and Project Management. 2002-2005: Colonial Interstate 175; $23.7MM Land Investment Project, Lee Co., FL. Acquisition, Debt and Equity Raise, Syndication, Underwriting, Project Management, Entitlements and Brokerage. 2001-2004: Judd Creek; $8.9MM Mixed Use Investment Project, North Fort Myers, FL. Underwriting and Feasibility, Acquisition, Equity Raise, Entitlement, Project Management and Brokerage. 2001-2006: Hendry Co. River Ranch; $17.8MM Land Investment and Development Project, Hendry Co., FL. Acquisition, Debt and Equity Raise, Syndication, Underwriting, Project Management, Entitlements and Brokerage. 2002 -2004: Telegraph Creek Ranch; $10MM Investment Project, Hendry Co., FL. Underwriting and Feasibility, Acquisition, Equity Raise, Entitlement, Project Management and Brokerage. 2000-2005: The Charlotte 58 Activity Center, Port Charlotte, FL. $13.2MM Acquisition, Debt and Equity Raise, Underwriting, Project Management, Entitlements and Brokerage. 2002-2006: Hancock Creek Commerce Park; $22MM Investment Project, Cape Coral, FL. Underwriting and Feasibility, Acquisition, Equity and Equity Raise, Entitlement, Project Management and Brokerage Dispensation. 1997-2008: Pinnacle Oaks; $12MM Residential Development Investment Project, Charlotte Co., FL. Entitlement and Project Management. 2000-2007: South Gulf Cove Residential; $30MM Waterfront Lots and Mixed Acreage Investment Project, Charlotte Co., FL. Acquisition, Equity Raise, Entitlement, Project Management and Brokerage Dispensation. 2001-2007: South Gulf Cove Commercial; $15MM 58 acre Commercial Acreage Investment Project, Charlotte Co., FL. Underwriting and Feasibility, Acquisition, Equity Raise, Entitlement, Entitlement/Project Management and Brokerage Dispensation. 1998-2003: Kelly Carlos; $17MM Land Investment Project, Lee Co., FL. Entitlement, Project Management and Brokerage Dispensation. 1997-2005: Bonita Grande;$12.5MM Land Investment Project, Bonita Springs, FL. Acquisition, Equity STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning&Design Services Raise, Entitlement and Project Management. Exhibit Two _ The One Naples Site Highest & Best Use CASE_THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING &STREET VACATION Page 1 of 4 Primary Trade Area BG 4 CT101.10 BG 3 '^ CT102.09 Naples Park BG 2 BG 1 CT101.09 CT102.09 BG 3 CT101.09 BG 1 CT101.09 BG 4 BG 3 CT102.08 CT102.15 BG 1 BG 2 CT102.08 CT102.15 The One Naples C-3 Primary Market Area For Retail Goods & Services _ 3,933 Households rCMmidi ody Page 2 of 4 Medium HH North Naples Census Tracts Persons HH Income Block Group 1 CT 102.09 672 353 $ 133,977.00 Gulf Shore Drive N. Of VBR Block Group 3 CT 101.09 1171 412 S 48,690.00 Naples Park (south) Block Group 3 CT 102.09 688 328 $ 160,917.00 Naples Park (west) Block Group 3 CT 102.15 1282 723 $ 250,001.00 Pelican Bay (west) Block Group 1 CT 102.08 492 280 $ 140,942.00 Pelican Bay (east & south to Pelican Bay Blvd) Block Group 2 CT 102.15 549 279 $ 191,875.00 Pelican Bay (south) Block Group 4 CT 102.08 774 443 $ 102,269.00 Pelican Bay (east MF US 41) Block Group 1 CT 101.09 423 235 $ 99,250.00 East & North VBR MF Block Group 4 CT 101.10 1165 547 $ 70,885.00 NE Naples Park Block Group 2 CT 101.09 709 333 $ 63,869.00 Naples Park SE TOTAL 7925 3933 AVERAGE $ 126,267.50 Source: American Community Survey_5 Yr. Est. Highest and Best Use IS THE SITE PHYSICALLY VIABLE; I.E., CAN THE SITE SUSTAIN THE DEVELOPMENT? FROM A REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, IS THE PROJECT REALISTICALLY FEASIBLE? IS THERE,AND/OR, WILL THERE BE A REALISTIC MARKET FOR THE PROJECT THAT OPTIMIZES INVESTMENT VALUE? Page 3 of 4 (D) (E) g► Al*. v • ": r \ I • Applicant's Evidence For The 100,000 SF Alt. Commercial Development Plan A. Will The County Vacate S4.3MM Street ROW For This Doubtful B. Is There A Market For 2nd FL, 3rd FL, 4th FL & 5th FL Retail No C. Is There A Market For 39,000 SF of Restaurant's Doubtful D. Does The 4.63 ac. +/- Site Incorporate Min. 30% Open Space (1 .38 ac.) No E. Does This Plan Incorporate Required Setbacks. Parking & Drainage Doubtful F. Does The Applicant's Plan Illustrate Feasible C-3 Uses No Findings 1. FOR THE ONE NAPLES TIS MODELED 39,000 SF RESTAURANT AND 61,000 SF RETAIL,A 100,000 SF COMMERCIAL PROJECT IS NOT THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THE SITE, IT WILL NEVER BE BUILT; CONSEQUENTLY THE APPLICANT'S DATA AND ANALYSIS IS QUESTIONABLE. 2. CONTEMPORARY CENTERS SUCH AS AND INCLUDING A TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER W./1 ANCHOR, A COMMUNITY CENTER W./1 TO 2 ANCHORS, A THEME/ FESTIVAL PROJECT, AND A LIFE STYLE CENTER, DO NOT FIT THE SITE'S REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, PHYSICAL SITE CARRYING CAPACITY AND MARKET FIT. 3. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC IMPACTS AND AN ACCURATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE MUPD'S TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC BENEFITS HAVE YET TO BE ESTABLISHED. Page 4 of 4 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Three The Adjacent Neighborhood Density, Building Height & Setbacks Exhibit For Neighborhood Complementary and Compatibility Analysis CASE_THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING &STREET VACATION Page 1 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Adjacent Neighborhood Study Area ..f. r G ��. yak-►re , . i may,, 0 D- i t' L ; . ' la "�C . 13..., ito H 1 J K L — t v. � .4 .0� Q - 64; »�• r i 4 1 • C 'rmiercial t I '� PlitW1 ' - '• •a & Trn_ • ---- V Y �` Pelic ast '..— l'a - -- ' 4,:; ,., -, co . ,, ..,,.: 0, . , .... , ,„. , 7,...:; --..„,,,. • • IN 4 The Pelr Bay i'1 (2) & (3). t FINDING _ Bay Colony/Pelican Bay Is A Functionally & Perceptually Distinct Neighborhood That Offers Little In Accurate Analysis 1 Gated Private and Semi-private Resort Access & Circulation _ South Gulf Shore Dr. Neighborhood Non-gated, Public Rd. Access & Circulation. 2 Large Scale DRI w./Unified Control and Community Associations Independent South Gulf Shore Dr. Neighborhood Projects. 3 A DRI Development Order and PUD Zoning _ Independent South Gulf Shore Dr. Conventional C-3, RT, RSF-3, RMF-6 & RMF-16 Zoning. 4 Large Parcel Urban Form w./Curvilinear Streets _ South Gulf Shore Dr. Vanderbilt Bch. Rd. Small Parcel Urban Form w./Straight Streets. 5 The Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Edge _ Limited Pedestrian Linkage From Site To Trieste/Pelican Bay; Arterial Road Separation. Page 2 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning &Design Services `- Site Building Frontyard Adjacent Communities Year Built #Units Area Density Ht Stories Setback A_Beachmoor 1981 33 1.7 ac 19.0 per ac 12 67.0 ft B_Phonecian Sands 1991 10 0.7 ac 15.3 per ac 6 25.0 ft C_Vanderbil The A Condo 9235 Gulf Shore Dr. 2005 19 1.3 ac 14.4 per ac 12 26.0 ft D_Vanderbilt Bch&Harbour Club 9318 Gulf Shore Dr 1982 44 2.1 ac 21.2 per ac 6 80.0 ft E_Seawatch Condo 9375 Gulf Shore Dr 1981 26 2.1 ac 12.5 per ac 8 45.0 ft F_Vanderbilt Bch Motel Condo 1st Add 9256 Gulf Shore 1990 16 1.1 ac 14.5 per ac 4 62.5 ft G_The Watermark Condo 9380 Gulf Shore 1991 22 1.4 ac 16.0 per ac 5 41.0 ft H_Vanderbilt Palms 1985 28 0.5 ac 52.8 per ac 3 20.0 ft I_Barefoot Pelican 1984 60 1.3 ac 45.8 per ac 5 35.0 ft 3_Vanderbilt Hideaway 377 Vanderbilt Bch Rd 1984 15 0.3 ac 53.6 per ac 4 17.0 ft K_Regatta 2000 205 9.1 ac 22.5 per ac 12&6 150.0 ft L_Chateau 9101 Vanderbilt Dr 1990 16 1.0 ac 16.5 per ac 2 20.0 ft AVERAGE DENSITY with H&J OUTIER PARCELS 25.3 per ac AVERAGE DENSITY W./OUT OUTLIER PARCELS 19.8 per ac AVERAGE DENSITY W./3 OUTLIER PARCELS&TRIESTE 25.1 per ac AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT with H&J OUTLIER PARCELS 6.4 Stories AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT W./OUT OUTLIER PARCELS 7.4 Stories AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT W./3 OUTLIER PARCELS&TRIESTE 7.5 (AVERAGE FRONTYARD SETBACK I 49.0 ft NOTE_Outlier Parcel Data For Statistical Analysis Denoted In Red Text NOTE_Trieste Is Within The Bay Colony Club Community Association&Enjoys Pelican Bay PUD Common Open Space Building Frontyard Other Nearby Communities&Buildings #Units Site Area Density Ht Stories Setback Beachwalk Gardens_SF Patio Homes 2 The Trieste 105 4.74 ac 22.2 per ac 20 120 ft The Ritz Parking Garage 3 58 ft Connor Vanderbilt Beach Estates SF 1&2 L. L► Page 3 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Adjacent Neighborhood Densities Adjacent Communities Year Built # Units Area Density A _ Beachmoor 1981 33 1.7 ac 19.0 per ac B_ Phonecian Sands 1991 10 0.7 ac 15.3 per ac C_ Vanderbil The A Condo 9235 Gulf Shore Dr. 2005 19 1.3 ac 14.4 per ac D Vanderbilt Bch & Harbour Club 9318 Gulf Shore Dr 1982 44 2.1 ac 21.2 per ac E _ Seawatch Condo 9375 Gulf Shore Dr 1981 26 2.1 ac 12.5 per ac F_Vanderbilt Bch Motel Condo 1st Add 9256 Gulf Shore 1990 16 1.1 ac 14.5 per ac G ,_ The Watermark Condo 9380 Gulf Shore 1991 22 1.4 ac 16.0 per ac H Vanderbilt Palms 1985 28 0.5 ac 52.8 per ac I_ Barefoot Pelican 1984 60 1.3 ac 45.8 per ac 3 Vanderbilt Hideaway 377 Vanderbilt Bch Rd 1984 15 0.3 ac 53.6 per ac K Regatta 2000 205 9.1 ac 22.5 per ac L Chateau 9101 Vanderbilt Dr 1990 16 1.0 ac 16.5 per ac AVERAGE DENSITY with H &J OUTIER PARCELS 25.3 per ac AVERAGE DENSITY W./OUT OUTLIER PARCELS 19.8 per ac AVERAGE DENSITY W./3 OUTLIER PARCELS &TRIESTE 25.1 per ac Seawatch Condo(9375 Gulf Shore)0 19.5 DUS/Ac. f or . �k Watermark Condo(9380 Gulf Shore)016 DUS/Ac. Connors der:' Vanderbilt Beach&Harbor Club Condo - Beach E. ,ry 33 DUS/Ac. 1 3 DUS/Ac. Vanderbilt Condo(9380 Gulf Shore)0 •=,t2 i • ! -Vanderbilt Beach Motel Condo 0.17.4 DUS/Ac. The Chateau 0 • 14.4 DUS/Ac. _ .- _ ... r - 16.5 DUS/Ac. + Barefoot Pelican Phoenician Sands 015.3 DUS/Ac. L - / ii� r The Regatta 5 • 5 DUS/Ac. Beachmoor 019 DUS/Ac. oprt• a.. = .>� I Gulf irul /- \ - , _..y -: I 5 • Page 4 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning &Design Services Adjacent Neighborhood Building Heights Site Building Adjacent Communities Year Built # Units Area Ht Stories A Beachmoor 1981 33 1.7 ac 12 B_ Phonecian Sands 1991 10 0.7 ac 6 C __ Vanderbil The A Condo 9235 Gulf Shore Dr. 2005 19 1.3 ac 12 D _ Vanderbilt Bch & Harbour Club 9318 Gulf Shore Dr 1982 44 2.1 ac 6 E _ Seawatch Condo 9375 Gulf Shore Dr 1981 26 2.1 ac 8 F _ Vanderbilt Bch Motel Condo 1st Add 9256 Gulf Shore 1990 16 1.1 ac 4 G _The Watermark Condo 9380 Gulf Shore 1991 22 1.4 ac 5 H Vanderbilt Palms 1985 28 0.5 ac 3 I _ Barefoot Pelican 1984 60 1.3 ac 5 J Vanderbilt Hideaway 377 Vanderbilt Bch Rd 1984 15 0.3 ac 4 K_ Regatta 2000 205 9.1 ac 12 &6 L Chateau 9101 Vanderbilt Dr 1990 16 1.0 ac 2 AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT with H &3 OUTLIER PARCELS 6.4 AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT W./OUT OUTLIER PARCELS 7.4 AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT W./3 OUTLIER PARCELS &TRIESTE 7.5 -ice • (The South VBR Bay Colony PUD'Neighborhoodr111115 • Trieste > ` . . Hai ' Steachwalk` _ 20 FL - - `T .ir °Gardens ' + ' `` . _ r anderbilt V; _ _ _ ► w • 2 FL � � '' _ away .ac„e fir Regatta_ -�� ro ►. •• 12 FL .•.r .' • J. . tall... m The Chateaut Pas _ _ • i t 2 FL .•/ - cant: FL ' • V ..i.:' _ FL -4 A oonician ._ ,, The North VBR Gulf Shore'Dr. Vanderb' o • • 1 i;" ,4 Neighborhood_ Conners Vanderbilt Vanderbilt Beac y 4w./RT,C-3,RSF-3, Motel Condo 4& 5 FL Bch. Estate S./D. RMF-6&RMF-16 .y SF ..�, Zoning Page 5 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Adjacent Neighborhood Front-yard Setbacks Frontya rd Adjacent Communities Setback A Beachmoor 67.0 B Phonecian Sands 25.0 C Vanderbil The A Condo 9235 Gulf Shore Dr. 26.0 D Vanderbilt Bch & Harbour Club 9318 Gulf Shore Dr 80.0 E Seawatch Condo 9375 Gulf Shore Dr 45.0 F Vanderbilt Bch Motel Condo 1st Add 9256 Gulf Shore 62.5 G _ The Watermark Condo 9380 Gulf Shore 41.0 H Vanderbilt Palms 20.0 I Barefoot Pelican 35.0 J Vanderbilt Hideaway 377 Vanderbilt Bch Rd 17.0 K _ Regatta 150.0 L_ Chateau 9101 Vanderbilt Dr 20.0 AVERAGE FRONTYARD SETBACK 59.1 Page 6 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services .... t 60- . - - _• 7-R+4- e , J Tart. - • .334t,44- . 45-f ' I' I IIIf! ‘''‘',11., e * -etf '� ` .4 : . : 'II 4 80-ItT 41- 1104.N- R r17!& • ti,,,, it _ 6 Story Ned rise 87-tt T �� 1. R • - �87- • 40.46-01-Parking Garage • 4 r , 0 MO IF.f- rtetsrarn e . 2 208-R. m r .,, , % 16 Float Towers — - let "'••�•••. :"��c s story Ytd rise 77-R t. * _ - - = 160-t. 'i- i Page 7 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Four A Complementary and Compatibility Assessment Between Site C-3 Zoning and Proposed MUPD CASE_THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING &STREET VACATION Page 1 of 3 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning &Design Services The Zoning District Compatibility & Intensity Assessment _ C-3 Grants Greater Complementary, Compatible and Less Intensive Development When Compared To One Naples THE APPLICANT PUTS FORWARD A JUSTIFICATION THAT RESULTING DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS, FORM AND INTENSITY UNDER THE EXISTING C-3 WILL BE WORSE FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAN THE ONE NAPLES PROJECT. THIS ASSERTION IS FALSE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. C-3 zoning is to support neighborhood commercial uses and activities; it permits neighborhood business, professional and personal services and small scale retail uses. Large retail uses greater than 5,000 sf are not permitted; no big Box Retail, Wa l m a rt, etc. 2. The Applicant's justification assumes the site can support a 100,000 sf retail center. This assumption is in error in that a 100,000 sf retail center is not the site's highest and best use. 3. The Applicant's justification assumes the site can support 31,000 sf of restaurant and 69,000 sf of retail, equal to 100,000 sf/42% site coverage. A more accurate and feasible 22% commercial use site coverage yields 52,000 sf, which is a compatible and normal neighborhood commercial center. 4. C-3 does not permit wholesale retail types of uses, does not permit outdoor storage, equipment and merchandise, and does not permit Hotels. 5. C-3 Neighborhood Commercial provides for local neighborhood goods and services and thus is compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods. Local neighborhood goods and services serve to reduce vehicular trips and trip length for US 41 goods and services. • One Naples does not provide meaningful type and mixture of neighborhood oriented goods; it will add to VBR and GSD traffic congestion because of the rezoning. No Hotel traffic impact analysis has been provided by the Applicant. 6. C-3 Business Commercial development may effectively disperse traffic via the Gulf Shore Ct./Southbay Dr./Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Gulf Shore Dr. Street grid with a 565- ft. Gulf Shore Ct./Southbay Drive intersection separation and no east bound left- out turning movements aligned with the parking garage. Page 2 of 3 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services • One Naples reduces safe intersection connection separation by 215-ft(from 565-ft to 350-ft.), while creating a new conflicting, east bound left-out aligned with the parking garage. 7. C-3 residential mixed use requires human scale pedestrian environment (see 4.02.38 Specific Design Criteria). C-3 requires: • A 21-ft wide pedestrian pathway with street furnishings and street plantings; * The Applicant is requesting an 8-ft multi-use path with no street furnishings; • C-3 Mixed Use requires enhanced parking lot plantings, enhanced building foundation plantings and building architectural standards; * The Applicant has not provided building architectural elevations and measurable designs, and has not provided detailed planting material information for building foundation landscaping. 8. C-3 Setbacks for the One Naples project are 25-ft parking garage and 104-ft for the two towers; these setbacks serve to reduce project intensity appearance and support neighborhood compatibility. • One Naples setbacks are 15-ft parking garage, 25-ft for the two towers and a 12.1-ft/zero-ft waterfront setback. These setbacks increase project intensity appearance and are completely detrimental to neighborhood compatibility. 9. C-3 provides for private and public common open space while relying on 30% open space. One Naples does not provide for public common open while relying on swimming pool rooftop open space. The MUPD does not provide legally defined and functional open space; see Exhibit 5 LDC 1.08.02 Definition of Open Space as "Areas that are not occupied by buildings': Page 3 of 3 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning &Design Services Exhibit Five Regulatory Framework & Key Collier County Rules For Approval CASE_THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING &STREET VACATION Page 1 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 1 . Key Collier Co. Growth Management Plan Rules: Land Use Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. • Comment_ One Naples Does Is Not Designed To Fit Into and Be ComplementaryTo The Neighborhood. Land Use Objective 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Land Use Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. • Comment_ One Naples Does Not Have Function Public Common Open Space &A Blend Of Densities Transportation Objective 7: Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and encourage safe and convenient on-site traffic circulation through the development review process. • Comment_One Naples Decreases Vehicular Safety By Creating A New 4-Leg Turning Movement Intersection While Reducing Intersection Separation Spacing. Coastal Management Policy 12.1.2: Land use plan amendments in the Category 1 hurricane vulnerability zone shall only be considered if such increases in densities provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times. • Comment_ One Naples Does Not Provide Hurricane Evacuation Time Mitigation; It Provides 170 Cots and A Trailer. Page 2 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 2. Key Land Development Code Density Rules: 4.07.02.B - Design Requirements _ External Relationships 1. Development within a PUD district shall be compatible with established or planned uses of surrounding neighborhoods and property. 2. The PUD shall provide protection of the development from potentially adverse surrounding influences and protection of the surrounding area from potentially adverse influences generated by or within the PUD. Fences, walls, or vegetative screening at the boundaries of PUD districts shall be provided, at a minimum, in accordance with the landscaping/buffering requirements of section 4.06.00 to protect residents from undesirable views, lighting, noise, or other adverse off-site influences, or to protect. • Comment_One Naples 2X's Height, 2X's Density, 70%to 100% Reduction In Setbacks & No Functional Open Space Is Not Compatible With The Adjacent Neighborhood. 4.07.02.E - Design Requirements _ Residential Density 3. The BCC may lessen density or intensity of development when it has been determined that development to the maximum density or intensity permissible in this section would: a. Create inconvenient or unsafe access to the PUD; or b. Create traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin or lead to the PUD; or c. Place a burden on parks, recreational areas, schools, and other facilities which serve or are proposed to serve the PUD; or d. Be in conflict with the intent or provisions of the GMP; or e. Create a threat to property or incur abnormal public expense in areas subject to natural hazards; or f. Be incompatible or inconsistent with surrounding neighborhoods or areas; g. Otherwise be inappropriate. • Comment_One Naples Decreases Vehicular Safety By Creating A New 4-Leg Turning Movement Intersection While Reducing Intersection Separation Spacing. • Comment_ One Naples 2X's Height, 2X's Density, 70%to 100% Reduction In Setbacks & No Functional Open Space Is Not Compatible With The Adjacent Neighborhood. Page 3 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 3. Key LDC Definitions: LDC 1.08.02 Definitions_Open space: Areas that are not occupied by buildings, impervious parking areas, streets, driveways or loading areas and which may be equipped or developed with amenities designed to encourage the use and enjoyment of the space either privately or by the general public. Examples of open space include: areas of preserved indigenous native vegetation; areas replanted with vegetation after construction; lawns, landscaped areas and greenways; outdoor recreational facilities; and plazas, atriums, courtyards and other similar public spaces. • Comment_ One Naples Private Recreational Rooftop Open Space Occupies The Top Of The Building & Does Not Meet Open Space Definition. LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _ Open space, common: Those areas within or related to a development, not in individually owned lots, designed and intended to be accessible to, and for the common use or enjoyment of, the residents of the development, or the general public. • Comment_ Project Lacks Functional Common Open Space For The Public Which Impacts Neighborhood Compatibility. LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _ Compatibility: A condition in which land uses or conditions can coexist in relative proximity to each other in a stable fashion over time such that no use or condition is unduly negatively impacted directly or indirectly by another use or condition. • Comment_ One Naples 2X's Height, 2X's Density, 70%to 100% Reduction In Setbacks & No Functional Open Space Is Not Compatible With The Adjacent Neighborhood While Creating Long-term Neighborhood Instability By Providing A High Density "Template" and Precedent For Possibly Up To 13 Different Gulf Shore Dr. Redevelopment Sites. Merriam-Webster Definition _ Complementary: Mutually supporting each others lack; as in the complementary relationship that binds the two. • Comment_One Naples Miami Beach-like Coastal Urban Form Is Not Complementary to The Neighborhood's SW FL Naples Suburban Coastal Form. Page 4 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _ Compatibility review: A review pursuant to the Architectural and Site Design Standards contained within section 5.05.08 of the Land Development Code (LDC) in effect at the time SBR Letters of Compliance are requested and that pertains to issues of compatibility with surrounding uses, complimentary patterns of development and mitigation of negative impacts. The Compatibility Review will be limited to compatibility issues, external sidewalks and pathway connections, lighting, dumpster location and screening, and orientation of buildings and ancillary facilities. • Comment_ One Naples 2X's Height, 2X's Density, 70% to 100% Reduction In Setbacks & No Functional Open Space Is Not Compatible With The Adjacent Neighborhood &Should Not Advance To The Final Site Plan Approval stage. LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _ Pedestrian pathway: The area between the Road Rights-of-Way and the building within the Commercial Mixed Use Project and the Residential Mixed Use PUD Project. The Pedestrian pathway shall include: street furnishings; a street tree planting zone, and a pedestrian travel zone, and shall be a minimum of 21 feet in width. • Comment_ One Naples 15-ft Setback & Pathway Does Not Meet Min. Code Standard. Page 5 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 4. 2.03.06 PUD Purpose & Intent: Collier County,FL Land Development Code 8/17/20,11 49 AM 2.03.06-Planned Unit Development Districts A. Purpose and intent.The purpose and intent of establishing the planned unit development district(PUD)is to provide procedures and standards to encourage mixed use planned developments that may be situated at appropriate locations,or planned developments that may or may not be mixed use in the urban fringe areas,all in accordance with the planning and development objectives of the county under the LDC and the GMP.It is further the purpose and intent of these PUD regulations to encourage ingenuity,innovation and imagination in the planning,design,and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership or control.PUDs produced in compliance with the terms and provisions of this LDC and the GMP may depart from the strict application of setback,height,and minimum lot requirements of conventional zoning districts while maintaining minimum standards by which flexibility may be accomplished,and while protecting the public interest,in order to: B. The PUD process is intended to accomplish the following: 1. Provide a creative approach to improve the quality of the built environment of contiguous tracts of land which will encourage development of infill parcels of contiguous tracts of land in certain circumstances. 2. Create a more desirable environment providing for consistency and visual harmony than would be possible through strict application of the minimum requirements of this LDC. 3. Encourage patterns of land use that support economical provisions of infrastructure,resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets with consequent lower construction and future maintenance costs. 4. Evaluate the impact of a particular PUD on the present and projected population,economy,land use pattern,tax base,street system,and public facility network(s)of the county relative to the various costs and benefits associated with such development. 5. Assure that the development employs techniques featuring amenities and excellence in the form of variations in siting,mixed land uses and/or varied dwelling types,as well as adaptation to and conservation of the topography and other natural characteristics of the land involved.Exceptions to variations in siting, mixed land uses and/or varied dwelling types may be granted on PUD infill development. C. PUD districts shall hereafter be established by amendment of the official zoning atlas according to the procedures established in LDC section 10.02.08 and the Administrative Code.The purpose and intent of establishing and identifying the following classifications is to identify a relationship between a proposed PUD and the other zoning districts within this LDC.The goal is to relate the purpose and intent of the PUD zoning district and the uses permitted within a PUD to defined zoning districts within this LDC and to establish appropriate uses and performance standards within this PUD,which are similar to those allowed by the most similar district(s).PUDs shall hereafter be defined by the following districts and shall be referenced as such within the PUD document as follows: 1. Residential planned unit development district.This district is intended to further the general purpose of a planned unit development district set forth above as it relates to residential areas.The principal use of any residential planned unit development is for human habitation in permanent and/or seasonal year-round dwelling units.The RPUD district shall be construed to include the following zoning districts:RSF-1,R5F-2, RSF-3.RSF-4,R5F-5,RSF-6,RMF-6,RMF-12,RMF-16,RT,VR,AND MH. 2. Community facilities planned unit development district.This district is intended to accommodate public aboutblank Page I n'17 • Comment _ One Naples Development Standards Are Not At All Similar To Those Allowed By Other Districts & Violate 2.03.06(c). Page 6 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 5. The Regulatory Framework _ 4.02.38 C-3 Mixed Use Purpose & Intent: 4.02.38 - Specific Design Criteria for Mixed Use Development within C-1 through C-3 Zoning Districts B. Applicability. All properties zoned C-1, C-2 and C-3. These regulations shall apply to all mixed-use projects proposed within these zoning districts, subject to the design criteria set forth in this section. The design criteria address the relationship of buildings, parking, vehicular, and pedestrian movement to create a pedestrian oriented experience. Buildings are encouraged to be built close to the vehicular and pedestrian way to create a continuous active and vibrant streetscape utilizing the architecture, landscaping, lighting, signagee and street furnishings. Vehicular travel ways support two-way traffic and on street parking. A logical pedestrian pathway system is provided throughout that connects the pedestrian movements from one use to another or within use areas. Building arcades and awnings are allowed to extend over the sidewalk to create shade and encourage pedestrian activity. Signage design shall be carefully integrated with site and building design to create a unified appearance for the project. Creativity in the design of signs is encouraged in order to emphasize the unique character of the project. Projects utilizing these design criteria will be developed in compliance with the LDC, except as specified herein. • Comment_ One Naples 15-ft Setback, Building Height and Pathway Does Not Meet Min. PUD & C-3 Mixed Use Standards. 6. Foundational Growth Management Plan Principles: Collier Co. Growth Management Plan Underlying Concepts _ Management of Coastal Development (VII) Extensive populated areas in Collier County are vulnerable to periodic salt-water inundation from tropical storms or hurricanes. It is extremely important that an acceptable balance between at risk population and evacuation capability be achieved. Within the Coastal High Hazard Area maximum permissible residential density is limited in recognition of the level of risk, the existing deficiency of evacuation shelter space and existing patterns of density. • Comment_ One Naples Doubles Density In Coastal High Hazard Zone. Page 7 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Collier Co. Growth Management Plan Underlying Concepts _Attainment of High Quality Urban Design While the Growth Management Plan as a whole provides the requisite foundation for superior urban design through a sound framework for growth (protection of natural resources, thoughtful guidance of land uses, adequate public facilities and adequate housing), the Future Land Use Element provides several additional measures. Collier County has also adopted Design Standards for all commercial development into the Land Development Code. These Architectural and Site development standards include building design, parking lot orientation, pedestrian access, vehicular movement, landscaping and lighting. • Comment_ One Naples Development Standards Are Not At All Similar To Those Allowed By Other Districts. Page 8 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Six The One Naples Collier County Growth Management Plan Internal Consistency Assessment CASE_THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING &STREET VACATION Page 1 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services FINDINGS _ The map amendment and zoning application is not consistent with 24 goals, objectives and policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. FUTURE LAND USE OBJECTIVE 3: Ensure protection of natural and historic resources, ensure the availability of land for utility facilities, promote compatible land uses within the airport noise zone, and to provide for management of growth in an efficient and effective manner through Land Development Regulations adopted to implement this Growth Management Plan. • (3) RESPONSE _ The One Naples development standards significantly vary from similar neighborhood zoning districts and, as such, do not provide for efficient and effective growth management. The project's 15-ft Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive (VBR and GSD) street setback effectively precludes any required future right-of-way and road expansion. Thus the development standard does not ensure the availability of land for utility facilities. The doubling of density, doubling of height, 70% to 100% reduction in setbacks, a 15-ft setback for a 1,066 linear foot +/- VBR and GSD parking garage at 40 to 45-ft tall, and the use of private rooftop recreation for common open space are standards inconsistent with LDC regulations and are not effective regulations needed to insure internal consistency. The project is not consistent with Objective 3. Policy3.2: Land Development Regulations have been adopted into the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) that contain provisions to implement the Growth Management Plan through the development review process. These include the following provisions: F The safe and convenient flow of on-site traffic, as well as the design of vehicle parking areas, are addressed through the site design standards and site development plan requirements of the LDC, which include: access requirements from roadways, parking lot design and orientation, lighting, building design and materials, and landscaping and buffering criteria. • (4) RESPONSE_The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. This reduces driver response time and in so doing reduces safety. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new "4-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and creates unsafe project east bound left-out turning movements that conflict with parking garage ingress and egress movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. The project requires a parking space deviation to reduce the number of required parking spaces. These facts demonstrate that the project does not advance safe and convenient flow of on-site traffic. The MUPD development standards weaken existing C-3 mixed use rules and reduces LDC efficiency and effectiveness. The application Exhibit G Streetscape Landscaping illustrates the applications lack of consistency with Objective 3 in so far as site planning, streetscape pathway design, urban design and buffering. The project's streetscape tree planting standards are the code minimum. The project's pathway design is 8-ft and not the code required 21-ft minimum. The project fails to meet Page 2 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services adjoining property and neighborhood compatibility standards. The project fails to meet it's entitlement request criteria under LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5. The project is not consistent with Objective 3 and 3F. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. OBJECTIVE 5: Implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element. • (5) RESPONSE _The map amendment language and the planned development standards do not ensure compatibility of land uses; the request eliminates existing C-3 zoning standards and proposes development standards that are outside the community norm. The project is not consistent with Objective 5 and Policies 5.3 and 5.6. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis. Policy 5.3: All rezoning must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan. For properties that are zoned inconsistent with the Future Land Use Designation Description Section but have nonetheless been determined to be consistent with the Future Land Use Element, as provided for in Policies 5.9 through 5.13, the following provisions apply: • (6) RESPONSE _The One Naples MUPD is not internally consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 8 The One Naples Planning Analysis. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. • (7) RESPONSE_The One Naples mixed planned development is not compatible with and complementary to the Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhoods. It is logically impossible for a project that doubles the density, increase height by 208%, incorporates 70% to 100% reduction in setbacks, features a 15-ft setback for a 1,066 linear foot +/- VBR and GSD 40 to 45-ft tall parking garage, and uses private rooftop recreation while not providing any functional common open space, to be found "complimentary and compatible" with surrounding land uses. The project fails to meet it's entitlement request criteria under LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis. OBJECTIVE 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: • (8) RESPONSE_The project introduces a Miami Beach-like Coastal Urban form into a SW Florida Naples Suburban form. Therefore it does not adhere to the Page 3 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services existing character of the community. It is logically and visually impossible for a project that doubles the density, increase height by 208%, incorporates 70% to 100% reduction in setbacks, features a 15-ft setback for a 1,066 linear foot +/- VBR and GSD 40 to 45-ft tall parking garage, and uses private rooftop recreation while not providing any functional common open space, to be found to "adhere to the existing development character" of the Collier County neighborhood. The One Naples project's development character is not compatible and complimentary to existing development character and is not internally consistent with Objective 7 and Policies 7.3 and 7.4. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part 8 The One Naples Planning Analysis. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. • (9) RESPONSE _The applicant is applying for a plat vacation for Gulf Shore Court and the western portion of Center Street (PL20200000368 is a Petition for Vacation). By definition and logic, the plat vacation demonstrates comprehensive plan Policy 7.3 inconsistency since it eliminates an existing interconnected street grid. The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new "4-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project east bound left-out turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project is not consistent with Policy 7.3. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. • (10) RESPONSE_The project proposes to use rooftop recreational facilities to meet its open space requirement. The LDC 1.08.02 defines Open Space as Areas that are not occupied by buildings. Consequently, the One Naples project cannot provide minimum open space are required by the LDC. In addition, the project features a 15-ft setback with an 8-fit VBR/GSD pathway within the public ROW. One Naples uses a 10-ft Southbay Drive and Center Street setback with 5-ft sidewalk. The project's pathway standards are below the code required 21-ft pathway standard. The project is based on using private rooftop recreation open space while not providing any functional common open space. This leads to increased intensity appearance while diminishing pedestrian scale walkable environments. The One Naples project's development height, bulk and building form does not encourage "walkable communities with common open space". The project eliminates functional mixed uses at the VBR/GSD intersection and streetscape level, thereby creating a 1,000 foot non-active "dead zone". The project is not compatible and complimentary to the GSD and VBR streetscape, hinders a walkable neighborhood environment, is is not consistent with 7.4. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 9 Compatibility Standards. Page 4 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT - UNDERLYING CONCEPTS Management of Coastal Development: Two major coastal development issues in Collier County are the protection of natural resources and the balancing of risk in natural hazard areas. (VII) Extensive populated areas in Collier County are vulnerable to periodic salt-water inundation from tropical storms or hurricanes. It is extremely important that an acceptable balance between at risk population and evacuation capability be achieved. In addition, public and private investment in such vulnerable areas must be carefully considered. • (1) RESPONSE _ One Naples requests an increase of density of 232% in the Coastal High Hazard Zone, from 74 units to 172 units. The new 98 units are equal to 167 additional persons to be evacuated and to be serviced in a post-evacuation environment. The Applicant's proposed mitigation is to provide the county with 174 emergency cots and and a 16-ft. 2-axel enclosed trailer. The estimated value of the proposed mitigation is $36,320. The estimated range of economic benefits to the Applicant, is $9.8MM to $29.3MM (@ $100K to $300K per new unit). The One Naples project fails to "balance population risk and evacuation capacity", along with fair and effective mitigation. The One Naples map amendment is contrary to public health and safety interests. Attainment of High Quality Urban Design - The report of the Regional/Urban Design Assistance Team (R/UDAT) for the Naples area, dated April 1987, and subsequent recommendations of the R/UDAT Citizen Committee, provides another underlying concept. While the Growth Management Plan as a whole provides the requisite foundation for superior urban design through a sound framework for growth (protection of natural resources, thoughtful guidance of land uses, adequate public facilities and adequate housing), the Future Land Use Element provides several additional measures. (XXI) Major attention is given to the patterns of commercial development in Collier County. Concern about commercial development relates to transportation impacts both on a micro (access to road network) and macro (distribution of trip attractors and resultant overall traffic circulation) level and it relates to aesthetics and sense of place. Within the Transportation Element a commitment to adopt standards for road access has been accomplished through the Access Collier County has also adopted Design Standards for all commercial development into the Land Development Code. These Architectural and Site development standards include building design, parking lot orientation, pedestrian access, vehicular movement, landscaping and lighting. These standards will provide for quality development that is responsive to the Community's character. • (2) RESPONSE _The One Naples development standards significantly vary from similar neighborhood zoning districts and, as such, do not provide for "High Quality Urban Design". Page 5 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning &Design Services FUTURE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT D.3.D_Transportation Element C. Perspectives: 1. Land Use Issues (VI) The Transportation Element is closely related to the Future Land Use Element. It has long been the pattern that the development of land necessitates improvements and expansion to the transportation system. The two elements are so closely tied, in fact, that changes or shifts in the land use patterns can drastically impact the performance of the roadway system. It is for that reason that the County requires most land development proposals (e.g., DRI, rezone and conditional use requests) to submit a Traffic Impact Statement. An analysis of the proposal's impact is prepared and submitted to the recommending and approving authorities. (VI) The County has also recognized the importance of good site planning as it relates to a project's ingress and egress from the major roadway system. Inadequate control of access points, median openings and signalized intersections can accelerate the deterioration of the systems overall level of service just as fast as the increases in traffic volumes. The County has developed and adopted policies to control the number, location and type of access points to the road network. These policies are based on the Collier County Access Control Policy (Resolution No. 92-42) and follow- up Resolution No. 01-247, and existing road and land use conditions, and are outlined in Section 4.04.02 of the Land Development Code • (11) RESPONSE_The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new "4-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project east bound left-out turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. The project requires a parking space deviation to reduce the number of required parking spaces. These facts demonstrate that the project incorporates a very poor site plan as it relates to a project's ingress and egress from the major roadway system. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE 3: Provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future rights-of-way based upon improvement projects identified within the Five Year Work Program, Board approved development agreements, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) adopted Long-Range Transportation Plan and/or similar Board approved studies, plans and programs. • (12) RESPONSE _The One Naples 15-ft Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive (VBR and GSD) street setback effectively precludes any required future right-of-way and road expansion. Thus the development standard does not ensure the availability of land for utility facilities and is inconsistent with Objective 3 requirement to protect future right-of-way. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Page 6 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning &Design Services TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE 4: Provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians and non-motorized vehicles through the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan. • (13) RESPONSE_The project requires a parking space deviation to reduce the number of required parking spaces. This demonstrates that the project does not advance pedestrian interests. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. These examples of transportation impacts demonstrate that the project does not advance pedestrian interests. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. The project is not consistent with Objective 4. Policy 4.7: The County shall incorporate bike lanes in roadway resurfacing projects as is physically possible and will not result in a safety or operational problem. Policy 5.1 (the Question for you to address is whether the Applicant complies with 5.1; if they do we need to not discuss 5.1): The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. (IX) Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. • (14) RESPONSE_The One Naples Master Plan applicant's proposed circulation improvement approach does not address the very important, north Vanderbilt Beach Road ROW traffic circulation problem; that is, Southbay Drive and other residential neighborhoods seeking to turn east towards US 41, with various resulting turning movements and traffic congestion concerns. The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/-to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive, thereby reducing mitigation efficiency and traffic circulation safety. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new "4-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project east bound left-out turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with Page 7 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning &Design Services particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements and thereby reducing mitigation efficiency and traffic circulation safety. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards slides 31 and 32, and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis slide 25 -16. The project is not consistent with Policy 4.7. TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE 7: Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and encourage safe and convenient on- site traffic circulation through the development review process. • (15) RESPONSE_The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. In doing so, driver reaction time is reduced, with an associated lowering of traffic safety. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new "4-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage. The project creates new and conflicting ingress and egress turning movement conflicts. The project further aggravates traffic congestion. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 8 The One Naples Planning Analysis. The project is not consistent with Objective 7. Policy 7.1: Collier County shall apply the standards and criteria of the Access Management Policy as adopted by Resolution and as may be amended to ensure the protection of the arterial and collector system's capacity and integrity. • (16) RESPONSE _The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. The 215-ft connection spacing reduction lessens roadway capacity by lowering vehicle travel time with a subsequent increase in traffic congestion. Policy 7.2: The County shall require the submission of a neighborhood traffic impact assessment as a part of all rezone and conditional use applications. This study will analyze the proposed project's impact on surrounding neighborhood streets. • (17) RESPONSE_The One Naples Master Plan TIS did not evaluate the proposed 215-ft intersection separation reduction to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan TIS did not fully evaluate the requests a new "4-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and its left-out east bound turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. Therefore the TIS did not properly analyze the proposed project's impact on surrounding neighborhood streets. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. The project is not consistent with Policy 7.2 Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. • (18) RESPONSE_The project is based on a 15-ft setback VBR and GSD for1,066 linear feet +/- of parking garage at 40 to 45-ft tall, with a pathway design that does not meet Page 8 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 4.02.38 C-3 Mixed Use and PUD 2.03.06 21-ft wide pathway standards. One Naples uses a 15-ft setback with an 8-ft VBR/GSD pathway within the public ROW. One Naples uses a 10-ft Southbay Drive and Center Street setback with 5-ft sidewalk. The project does not incorporate the code required 21-ft pathway standard. The project is based on using private rooftop recreation open space while not providing functional common open space. This fact leads to increased intensity appearance while diminishing pedestrian scale walkable environments and neighborhood compatibility. The One Naples project's development height, bulk and building form does not encourage "walkable communities with common open space". The project eliminates functional mixed uses at the VBR/GSD intersection and streetscape level, thereby creating a 1,000 foot non-active "dead zone". The project is not compatible and complimentary to the GSD and VBR streetscape, hinders a walkable neighborhood environment, is is not consistent with 7.4. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibits 8 and 9. FUTURE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT HURRICANE COASTAL MANAGEMENT GOAL 12: To Make Every Reasonable Effort To Ensure The Public Safety, Health and Welfare Of People and Property From The Effective of Hurricane Damage • (19) RESPONSE_One Naples requests an increase of density of 232% in the Coastal High Hazard Zone, from 74 units to 172 units. The new 98 units are equal to 167 additional persons to be evacuated and to be serviced in a post-evacuation environment. The One Naples project fails to "make every reasonable effort to ensure public safety". The One Naples project fails to provide for fair and effective mitigation in a balanced manner. The One Naples map amendment is contrary to public health and safety interests and is inconsistent with Goal 12. Please refer to the testimony and documentation provided by Daniel Trescott, MUARP regarding hurricane evacuation and mitigation. Policy 12.1.2: Land use plan amendments in the Category 1 hurricane vulnerability zone shall only be considered if such increases in densities provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times. • (20) RESPONSE_One Naples will provide 174 emergency cots and and a 16-ft. 2- axel enclosed trailer. These items are for shelter and not for hurricane evacuation times. Hence, the One Naples does not provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times and is inconsistent with 12.1.1. • One Naples requests an increase of density of 232% in the Coastal High Hazard Zone, from 74 units to 172 units. The new 98 units are equal to 167 additional persons to be evacuated and to be serviced in a post-evacuation environment. The Applicant's proposed mitigation is to provide the county with 174 emergency cots and and a 16-ft. 2-axel enclosed trailer. The estimated value of the proposed mitigation is$36,320. The estimated range of economic benefits to the Applicant, is $9.8MM to $29.3MM (@ $100K to $300K per new unit). The One Naples project fails to provide for fair and effective mitigation in a balanced manner. The One Naples map amendment is contrary to public health and safety interests and is inconsistent with 12.1.2. Please refer to the testimony and documentation provided by Daniel Trescott, MUARP regarding hurricane evacuation and mitigation. Page 9 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning &Design Services Policy 12.1.13: The County shall continue to mitigate previously identified shelter deficiencies through mitigation from Developments of Regional Impact, Emergency Management Preparedness and Enhancement grants, Hazard Mitigation and Pre-disaster Mitigation Grant Programs funding, and available funds identified in the State's annual shelter deficit studies. • (21) RESPONSE_The Applicant has not provided a mitigation plan for county staff review. Hence there is no evidence that the cots and trailer is sufficient to mitigate for previously identified shelter deficiencies. The One Naples project is contrary to and is inconsistent with 12.1.3. Policy 7.2.1: The County shall apply the marina siting criteria contained in the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan (NR-SP-93-01), May 1995 in order to direct increased boat traffic away from sensitive manatee habitats. • (22) RESPONSE_The One Naples GMP map amendment has not provided information regarding its requested marina. The application violates FSS 163.3177(6) by not providing any data and analysis regarding marina siting, fuel dock location, seagrass baseline and impacts, manatee impacts, water quality baseline and impacts, and other key data and analysis. The One Naples map amendment is inconsistent with 7.2.1. Policy 7.2.2: Sea-grass beds shall be protected through the application of Policies 6.3.1, 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 of this Element. • (23) RESPONSE_The One Naples GMP map amendment has not provided information regarding its requested marina. The application violates FSS 163.3177(6) by not providing any data and analysis regarding marina siting and seagrass baseline and impacts. The One Naples map amendment is inconsistent with 7.2.2. Policy 10.1.5: New marinas shall conform to the following criteria: a. Marinas must provide vehicular parking and sewage pump-out facilities; b. Fueling facilities shall be designed to contain spills from on-land equipment and shall be prepared to contain spills in the water. c. Marina facilities must be accessible to all public services essential to ensure their safe operation. d. Marinas and multi-slip docking facilities shall prepare hurricane plans for approval which describe measures to be taken to minimize damage to marina sites and neighboring properties and the environment; this hurricane plan shall be reviewed and approved by the County. e. Dry storage should be encouraged over wet storage. • (24) RESPONSE_The One Naples GMP amendment has not provided information regarding its requested marina. The application violates FSS 163.3177(6) by not providing data and analysis regarding marina siting, marina service access and circulation, dumpster service location, fuel dock location and fuel spill protection, water quality baseline and water quality protection and management, and seagrass baseline and impacts. The One Naples map amendment is inconsistent with 10.1.5. Page 10 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning &Design Services Exhibit Seven Street Vacation Value and Applicant Benefit Assessment CASE_THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING &STREET VACATION Page 1 of 4 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning &Design Services The Value and Benefit Analysis _ Applicant Obtains Est. $7.49MM In Unique Economic Benefits, Deregulatory Benefits and Substantial Density Increase STREET VACATION BENEFITS&APPLICANT DEVELOPMENT COMMITME'.'ASSESSMENT;0,e . MOD Site Area 5.42 sc. Total ROW Vacation 0.79 ac. ROW Density 13 units Existing Site Area Without Street Vacation 4.63 sc. Existing Ste Value Acquisition Value(Collier Prop.Appraiser) S 25,300.000 0C Price Per Ac. S 5,464,362.85 per ac. Pnce Per SF S 125 44 psf ROW Value $ 4,316,846.6S ROW Units(assume 16 DUS/ac.) 13 units ROW Unit Value S 300,000.00 Est.ROW Unit Value S 3,792,000.00 TOTAL EST.ROW LAND&UNIT VALUE $ 8,109,846.65 DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS EST COSTS APPLICANT EST.COSTS 174 Emergency Management Costs S18C per S 31,320.00 16-f 2.axel Enclosed Utility Trader S S,00C.00 Traffic Signal s 4oQ000.00 VBR Extended Garage Left Turn Lane f 125,000.00 Garage Tech s 50,000.00 South Bay Dr.Improvements(1) • GuV Shore Dr Sidewalk (1) • VBR 8-ft Multi-use Pathway (1} Enhanced Landscaping (1: • Total Est.Developer Commitment Value S 611,320.00 $ 1,750,000.00 (1) Identified Developer Commitments are generally required by LDC 6.C5.00 Drainage &6 06.00 Transportation,along with a marginal development/maintenance cost difference,are not credited to developer commitment est.value BENEFIT TO DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENT ASSESSMENT ROW VALUE Est ROW Value(excludes new.;nits) i 4.316,846,65 Net Benefit To The Applicant S 3,705,526.65 BENEFIT TO DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENT ASSESSMENT ROW 6 NEW UNIT VALUE Est,ROW Value and 13 New ROW units S3C0<per S 8.108,846 Si. Net Benefit To The Applicant $ 7,497,526.65 $ 6,358,846.65 Page 2 of 4 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services LDC 6.06.00 Transportation Sidewalks, Bike Lanes & Pathways 6.06.02•Sidewalks,Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements A All developments must construct sidewalks bike lanes. and pathways. as described below For protects subject to architectural aes,gn standards.see LOC section 5 05 08 F for related provisions Sidewalks and bike lanes must be constructed within pubic and private rghtsof•way or easements. which are adjacent to t^e site prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for Cy-Sbus.bu•' auttrvr,cvd by n firinl autxhyrsv y at arty nrryruverr ierit 51e d.vwluprn.nl pia^ unless otherwise deterrri^eo by the Co..nty Manage'or designee. as fo cws Typical Cross Sidewalks—Both sales • ' Bike lames—Both sides Sectior 6 feet wide 5'eet wide Arterials and collectors X X Local/Internal Accessway X '• Except mat only rec.J red on one srae(cosest to the development)where nghtof•way IS adjacent to but not within the subject development and except as set forth below in this sect on - Unless otherwise detern• red by the County Manage*.or designee. that the exlstirg ROW cross-sect or is physica y constrainec or construction woad result in unsafe conditions - Unless otherwise ice^tided on the Co her Co my Comprehensive Pathways Pan Update, as a^sended as a potent al off-street pathway corridor 2 Sidewalks arc bike lanes rrs.st oe constructed within public and private rights-of-way or easements which are rnterr'a to the site as follows Typical Cross Sidewalks—Beth s des ' ' Bike Lanes—Both sides ' Sectior 6'eet wide 5 feet wide Arterials and collectors X X local/Internal Accessway X Page 3 of 4 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services '- Except that only required on one side (closest to the development)where right-of-way ,s adjacent to but not within, the subject development and except as set forth below n this sect on Lintels otherwise determined by the County Manage'. or des gnee. t^at the existing ROW cross-sect o" is physica•y constrainer or const•ucton would •esu't 1^ unsafe conditions - Except that Co, resident a development projects where 75 perce^t o' more of that protect's ►a^c area has been approved as of March 8 2005 for site development plans o• final subdivision plats wit^ sidewalks o• bike lanes t^at are only rec..ired o^ one s de of the ROW then a I aopticat ons for subsequent site development plans or final subdivision plat may be approved wit" sidewalks o• bike lanes on only one s de of the ROW '- Fo• development projects seek ng aop•oval of a final subdivision plat or site development plan of 4 or fewer dwelling units per gross acre and w^ere 15 o' fewer dwelt ^g u^ is front on a ROW that to"mnates in a cul-de-sac. then sidewalks wi o^ y be •ec..red 0^ one side of the ROW and not aro.,^d the circumference of the cul-de-sac P^or to the issuance of individual certificates of occupancy. the •equirec sidewalks a o^g the Ind vidual parcels frontage shall be constructed Pnor to the issuance of 75 percent of the certificates of occupancy authorized by a f nal Subdivision plat s to improvement or s to development plan, at sidewalks and bike lanes that be constructed. ess otherwise dete•r^mned by t^e County Manager or designee 3 Required pathways as dent fie in t^e Coll er County Comprehensive Pathways Plan, must be constructed a m nimurr of •2 feet in w dtr'. wit^n pubic and private rights-of-way o- easements. which are adjacent to or ntemal to the site Pr or to issuance of t^e first permanent certficate of occupancy for construct o^ authorized by a final subdivision plat. site improverre^t. or site development plan, a required pathways shag be provided, unless otherwise ceterm ned by the County Manager or designee COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELO?MENT CODE 41. • I ` • Majcr Collectcr a-id Arter a,s • Page 4 of 4 CIS a) ct czl crJ -r•,% -a'. 0 -ci _, -c-ia., E ,c, ,k; ct c, , -t g ) . ca •- W o , ct r--, u0., i-ci 2L.i 0.., , ,,,, j up „L., c2,..i , . ,., ,,, m ,t rd if), a E ,c2, -‘4 7,1, kti cu 4 cp cic% ;.., up :1-i.„ co u ,., . c, ,,, rt 4 Nctcz% C. a, co ._i x o t' E cf) R Cc C) co 4 a) , a ° I cu ?. W 714 0 cis 3 't� cc - E Cn � CD u ct - u o cicl o a cn � ' a)cl) ' "0 Z 4 Ca ;6C1 C) .� u CID b+.J ct czl a ct © -+-' ^' -'--' c� Z -� .� �� C) c� `" MI R CO ct 4 U) Cip V bi3 (� 0 a) O ;..+ u cu ct co c.. 4 Z`%-i "5 ;IT ct (1) • "0-5 .cli 5 CVCI A PIimimml Oill Icir) rt rt II (..) 8 0 Z � C1-14,..., 4.) -., 0 o ----,.. ...1!I''. '�'� II ; .11 M A. ot ,,� ^ 1 Z r 0cu © ---„„) N .: t . ... 1 -111.11MIt EI H 117:::: Z -4C-12 �I up o (111) [4 lh't : i i U t.: {r ct ;IIMIMI ',NI Clit .40,!! • ; 1 0 , .0 . U 0 1 -0 o U E le . N t- . . . , , . › , ,,,, s - ,t @ g '' •.1 1 ' ' . . .. c.r, F Ts .. ,,,,...01. :..,..__,___. .. A " ''''''1. . 110i . e. . . CID ., _ . ,. 7 , 0 . 4 .. :.. 4,„-,..A. _ -0 ., , 0 c� . , , . sa., .. •_ A . „,. • c) <i_... _ ;._., --,5--- - C) _,_ . • • , ......:4_.... .... - --, � Z J m 0 10 cu U O I co a) O O c • al O = z r. C ,,,s C � cv0 � O - \ IT .4 -1 p t0 • _lik'amok (�-lp/) � *� = a as z r ea o � � v� o, 1 O • � 7 � � �i to \ aM1-1 ' vtL. ~xf � �cUi ma, f MI6 R-+ WI ii li = yJ a�otirj I: i 1.4 ULLC h"'I (� Q � � aC � � � 'J 0 W Q +�'' LL O .� +p•. lf k 0 , 2 _i 0 ,..o cr = cv `.+� j `t1 �yNCM7 (A p 4 1 o m 2 t p` 'a EL ELc o0 1 � �' 1 w > � � cco Cl? _ � �Y � � U j. , jcaca coca • .� -� ' a o � � vaQ p� k V W Ow O cn O ID. •."" 44 (n C ~ .0 . N N N V = 1- F- 00 CD a)p0 Ca. , .n 2ppo a PO ' I d QCiUdLL• IIi Q 0 PO 0 ......I � a) = O4.4 U C C C.)eti elcn ,E Ct ,.., ,-1 ry Z N �, o 1171: Z Cd 0 © " 4 V O O . Vj Cit .11 rt r.-- _ O O R Cr) a u Q 4 r•Aa) U \ c! P a) .U 0 IL:12 CnimLi r/t_, -----. F.Cil ClEr'-- "SCI) ./-12 0C105> ;'-1›.1 M "-I el cr) W o x U " c" >"' u 1 :P: V ucij U P2. O W g H a) < U Xcn < t�cu X c • cd • v � � a W r-+ - w I P-1 cr) m .14 4-I C N • C -Y. 0 E c t• •1•�� � ra ~ O 4 cn ma 2 - Van - oUQaaUO CU � ' 1 w 'ht i--\ +` `�� can 17:11 qv .(13 rail c naillE g 4V- , I 1.- C 1.:;‘: -, ; ' 4, '. 4•1- - , CD- ' it '�O ' ` . • tibay' . �• `• y it $ • ,...1 44117: ' Oa j. • • �' LL 1'1 COm �1 : L9 LL - 4 ��C • •• M - ... III °1115.1116 • r NCJ - 4 gelq . Vil * .• A N t it.►•• o r Cn CL. Woll416: ;,,j 1 e . i w 0 . .1 , �s M . �-- o, QCU Y li Z E ` E 0 '^ V1 ea CI I •CD C o c 8 m Ci: CU g Ct E I Il Vo a) c n u u (::::) a) o r LL 0 VI up '; m im4 CU N O5 co . if E o t .-V N -0 •C y C ,mo d jh --,w . • " `�. G �p�-mf p� i 2, Zco < co C E 5 .c '*+ Q Z : • i s 'a 4nq, a U CO N .�' 0 ��.,� • m C 13) U wa. c, c a) a .-- ,25 CC al -It ,,,i "V a a• .." • „ .-c .0 1 0. 4, Ili E c 0 — le 2 w z C3) 00 4 CO •" ..r ''' t , c W ��� N v o O Z , eZ a'K r... - a 1;.-• N JJ25 — O27:. N !► 1► •1" O Y ' 4a4ra: a -. •s Q U m Lk_ c,�n i !+ O .L� i .i w O 'v to bv-.!A i X d m CO ,� to +ry,ti 4. A. +t... �'1 ik. {� .„-:Jr. = Q a: > c,i 2 iJ t C: Q0a 0 1.11 03 V i 6 u_ 0 CD. ? Q �} ;; era'' ; . .- H . ., iir • +� '� � `''f ln it � �� 01 0. °d03 . h � 1/4e °�. � L- � D co, � �v l�a • , - 41,Ili , oN •t C p p 0)U E °ti t♦ . cu 1 al !/'" It, Z3 ° a) 0 % `� �M� IIP d .. • ' .. ai rn 1 .rn °o - O 'Q U p 0 - .- Jt�� '. Z 5 Z 07) 0 a i -- V1 .. R i . iJ � p a, � 76 aJ 1 °t' • l�« ac 4-2 i E' a� o Q •� LU O CA 4.0 u, to am R Van DUCtsaUO � L.�, ♦ • Z �+Z 5 � 4J liu C. i 71 '' 1130 -,, . - ,‘-,S?Lo.h.. 3 'III .2.37 = c > .- >,r _.-_,- •— s•>c - �Z./1 I 1VU Oa -0 . O a, E i u) - >, r.r aO l aO rm.. Q Z 0 0 °, a • 'I NU - a, �_ r�i E Of 4 Q � Q to I _ CN .11 ' — hbaV1' , - 1.tor- C ._ C0 0_4! cel CC cl) 'TJ . £ � i +' 1 p ct � 013 3 'O CO '. mE. d ,� > U E W DC J '- ig al ibm V 4 ' ' ' V cCQ V fC r- - ei Ile v.- . \ D' • - . • a; >,LI, (1) 0 0 _ .0 sa --- -ac t s .•m'm HI .7,_> 1 1 2`1) -c-N- 45 V .. Q C Z' O 0 a CC a) C O cn co ° L au co cu ZQC� J <LJF=►. N LL CO N co V to I— C r • �� • J O -'`' . i ir 4141 Li- lip 1111 4400;1'. xj 30)00- , s • . 1111F • /QJ C .G •• ' t C.7) 144.: e 1.0 I . • cp co a 4 t = O 1.11 OILo• l# 4t I- 3 E.ae 'a 404 hist fir r : .47,•-•••14'' a'• 3 ,,,4 le I IF 81:0114k 4010 : VI It a LL- I ' 034 .. jai t lo. ::: iir),\HD M i.,(1t -C CD it IP, if ; o I— Z 3 DC N CU 1 0 13 t° ,cr oo a Wit, .i A •- m t !'0; 1- o ON I V 1,40: 6 4 g ■ LI a LL O It N R or •' cra (Ni es w R u. ^�' .43 rump i i a ‘... 401 4•0 V \'t . a W Z C t I a CC • ' • R J Q cD -0 .' = —11 f �1 .0 a .0 ,- c� - cT I R N a !� ; � 4 I ' U O O � a R +� -U p tr CD c� Q Q �,_, Q L'G') U0 10 • 1 1 O• m o a) Lo. a) Lf) .i`1 - • cu ....-.. 0 CO co I- 1- I- fi- . 4-# '' ' • ,.S _ O 1 ,* i !. kJ I Q ,�0 cor.4" , C �� ; t • , ......„ 0 „i 4 j,` f ; V r a CNI O � 5 Y L ~ ,' CU c�) 0 t . "� • 0' Uv co IS �� LJJ C) 1 N t o it w o r.t i o y f U °' N - m 'y I �t ,f . - Q 8 a 41 , Ai N 0) .::. .x > ---ell .--'- ;. 1 .....-. it:if. ' .... ' '-' ..fi; )( D s 00 . • .•. <'S /id, I I CU J Mom,, ' �� = � t. - . 1-11/1 -`g • N -4- ...I ar A k I 7QoQ a-Q Q s O G3 7- G� O c) G) G� ••, m -cmon _cm J ' OUo C.1) o 0 CO c) Cr)4-4 Cn J • ui 1- up r- U o r W a z O co UD E o f° m r o o o m O Q U o U o .� s = -0 -0 m o Q -E m2,- a) ..c :� a M co c,o - > X U)) 7:_ ri • • as ' .'', ,• C J ILl ! t. 11 ' .4 L. ' . MO:i ..ri,...! .- 4,0 t 41 . fs. '4! • I ? co i ct i.._ ___ • . c , . .,.. . , 01 0 g ..,1� �' • - N il *I —. I 1C �Qi u - 4 r. _'r - - i �i 1 cr W. fa �I . +1 oc, 4-0 f . •�n rf a. n W ,yM d L ,. .......iir.optingrAISZYPir itli • •01. 1303 0 • +� fit. 1 •` E le _ t. , !t ct tiCil O I 173 @ QJ up F W -� V U O CID Q t M CO X 4 W I N rn ct N r--1 u O O .-. `c N N • ct P•-I a) • O 6 ou m O 4 E \ 1_7p can p ; �+�',,, ,�,I Cr) a1 CD O p O .-- t O O , .0 °� u p \ T -1 bIJ a) ct �; N ,..4_, • 0 cn co E 0.9 777,i, ;-0 „E3 . 17:: 0 ‘-i-i ;..1 ;..4 - CI) U .,� to ? al o Ct •. to an) o r--� c� 7,1 c) ,--� N car) N ro Cl) . o ` > ci .Ca..i Q••, N O O v-1 co 0 CD X Ctcn •,7 o li/Pri I I I I I I I I I Q Cip c up � � � � � a) � ( CA 0 cp C 0 a) C CD a) C a bA CI) Q o co a) co a) a . a) a) cC a .up a 42, o i 31#1 il lit _LILI4j 1 i4 %.— N 14— non VI - iiiii - -- 41. co L 1+}4 (cj �I 3j 71! 3t�, '� lir CutCC ;' i Z �O ,d., O +-� CRS • ..I ..) Cn O C.: 1 ` f { Y.•f1 I HI . t V/ ' crS u 9 4111111,1Pr Iii g H4. I, a) co cfn N C r, 1 ii, r I. : _..0_ la_ -1.,-.. — % �� W c , — , , - 8 - .I; :1 1/1 r , ♦ QJ cc ,, ........ L..1 _J 1 .,: .777,1k,7 . . ... :,,; (1.) i........ '''• I I L i L r } V ` (^i) Ct p k EE S '-1 1 lr ° I f I . V • of J C, CI) 4 1 I '. l'ilf I o Z g Fill i H -CILI jill °I ..1 - 11 '. 3 - el 1 '... W . ::, , 1 I r til 14— Cit ... : •, CD ii N i �/ I —` _ rid '; Z - = 0 . ,:_:___ • • I.M 3.di 0 I( x O 1 rr + . s �l I r'T 11 . -� •� (13 • ,•• li U �C ;••1 a) O • U ct -in II bA � C1� �Iml :� CZ$ .fEl a) C N �' +•• a) bA u C CU E .rai O i DI 17:: ct (t 7:5 -1E .r?.1 -0 bA 0 cu (1) .2 1 E -. ' ." p_, ia% U a) p E O ; 1 cn Tti p QQ Cn VD P.0 cri (e) (13 8 Clio• CI) r--1 + CLI CU U > CP W O bA O e ' I immIC:1 7--.4 0) °� a. z Ct E cn y_c) •,--, 1..i (13 c4 ' MI C ,`� O = Cut > U ;.1 .4--e . ...2i rd,_, -5 co cip II c 0 0 cl) �IN) N U C) ct 0_ Q O O O E 1-' Ce.:.1Q U Q 0 4' .. . ,, s co CLe - oww•jrZ." =et" , )•010.4.004 a.arbeftt Ia/34.3• am mar•.•••.... 16167•••••••10...r.K.:7... file"POO - --- V) CN1 x-1 • +4 t- es .1 .-'' .4.$.. 44%itqf'; . • • ''.7: ' • ellr, • S.; . leo _4,:‘, ..%.. C • MI •.- • , . 1 • • - ---1,- ilo • • ' j _ ilit . - 31.,,i4r4"Li..0 l' !N '• '...—... t • .1, , .. .% s 4 '. *•fr . - • I ,- s-• . 1 ... Cr Ct Cr 1 o,•,-, „. .16 itsi.il Ili '_ J-'_ ,-• - r 7 1`1.1, 11 (1.0) • • I _j. • '1 . 41 - ', , . .,.4 ,_ 0 QJ pii Cr . tii! i • : . ,14 ,.. .. 1zs,,t):: ... •e" . gy . -.. , = Cr (2: • a) AO Il C't •tAs . 4 m f cc QJ - - . 0 • ..• _ •.- :,.. ' . , 41e............. •L. 4- 4 o ic ' Alil . 1\4 limm ( t Om •I IN) ..d. 0 1131 111) 241 . elk V O 14!‘ am il 1;111 f..ii • = CO CV E E Mb NMEIBM; ap ., II 1;!li 4-+ 3 r•L ,.. 1...= E Cit lakil -.7--. • --. - - , . .17• ..r.: min wir • ; 7 : ;1 :: * ::. , : I '1 0 Z 55 C'D N . I ., '" t. . . _ - - ii •7 .- ... ' 1.. ..•41 . : ' 4•fli v, 1 , t. -,.!. ::. .1- ' . 3.4..: •- 1 0 k al) co: ;. .... ' :. • ' : s. - 1.1. • r :-..g31, . . ! 4-0 cfi ----, .. . ;- k : . .„ - A . g i j . ,• i, .. a; I 41 I kJ lei 62 \...... -I :7 ; ps:. : di 4 9, • 1 , ...L...,..„ 1 : •, '" .....1-*dog.... tio" ,• fidi..I • LJ- . Cr -.. .. '.-1:, .;71:.-J .• 1 .7.; ' .. I. ! a;- a) a I 1 _I ir, . ...., ,v7,-, 71. ri. .e: • ' 2! E Ct IL .- •.- ..;:, .o __ ... ',d.' II:D.Lit. I. rta I:: .6,,,,. 7" .1c,,, .ihi"• = 6 lil, CZ I • ..., IL \-1 tk I -.% •,--,-, .-c To) t-, ty: ti E .. , ; g 2 a •-0.1i — ..c2 1 I , r .a. 8 g. . , ,,, i ,, f <a 31.. rr3 C '6 E .., a . C • .1 .11. ‹C Z = .....,..,. ,,:..• i 1: c 02$ T F, ,-... -p (0 (u. 1.1 Vg. it ..iiiictuiti...:.4, • . ,z, _ { till 11_____Ii iltifrOINO.4.0 T....0 . ..i. 4—, , ,,, 03 c,_, 4"1 Ci. _A___.11 , rag _ 4 • ,i‘11.4111W . ____.-•••••••-'.......:-41'.. . . 0 1 I Cr -1 ._ c - .0 J 10 E o --................. QJ , Clo.) c 7, cm -0 en f• , .,T, = cu • Car CD i -g LI Cr ti) C/D T.-I 4_,6 Il.) < (7) Ct — o 0 o >, 1 .1 1-1c1.1 41•1 = ›., ct r ,ct 0 .4_, co r--, ,-1-1 0 ,4 cn c 03 t6 •1.-.1 71-1 -1--, ,—, ,121 . ;-4 ct cl, H (..) ,..,0 C• 0 0 Clis) E .--1 cd C:4 0 cu ,..6.4 ct - ',.,.,, ;.-4 ;...i cd %.N.1 k.4-4 0 i-• (1) v-1-1,.., i-S-I 0 U) VI V) -0 C Ca.) +.•/ ;..1 t.CI g=i1 Cil Ct „1 0 •T 'l :I• 5 cf) c) ct •- , •, ,, ,-' 164— 1 co 0 , z 0 T' (..) 1 ' c.f) c.r) a_ u) Illei (ID cn m V U C.) •v �' Cn bA "' 2 . Cn 0 ,O . a ,. U Oa HI w 0CZ E �I 1-1 ;a)-+ O 0 a� N O Z E z0 Ct up .5 �—, p f Cn E 7 mit +al '.0 ° 2 . cz p 75 E 4, ro �., 0> Rs w _ C Q Z Z bA ;..I N L; '" 1. g' 2 1 , -1-, ,..c Cn cz - ct bA s Cut Ct w T ;~ z v' I—I X X 3 o O u CO I I . .,....1--) x 0 r.� E O r, 0 C/) +, O .,� CC/ +-+ +-+ cn o cn v, a) ,. d .4ri; i 5 -I-1 r-, tj ' 4 Ca) cp r.i.L 4< •V "4 ct •O c U W cr' O .,_' .4_' 4-' Q F X X �E C`� Q ci) p.., 0 +, p W W c Q G) 7 61—ICZ OC:1-4 p E •v .� .0 O v Q rdE c� o Z Z Z Z Cn V� Qcm m bA QJ a U "0 u I E • '~ oJ `� +-+ +- c� u O ' o C!) u') ,_.4 O ci.i - U > U '�+• c c • -1 O O 4 ft U 'd N [—•-+ cv N '4..1 "It H 1:11 I E ' � x vi b 0 czu 0 o cn ,4 in �,szi u A__, , tet op O ci N IL . a N tr O • s. � 1 � y j1pI td V �i U ccU c u rT �l oI , . 4 0 ri Ocp P. p. a a, _,I- , , A I t _ __ ? _ 1— m V N �r'�� t r 0 cr e- r VI,: 'S i. _: N Ct _,.....# 1▪ - � . _ 4 �.� VW . fin,- 11' j _.: ,iftailFli . r ,,,c E CN(le . . A (5 aJ o '': CO . '. It • 7 ; o Cr 0- ; A k , . Qn ,Aiiiiiiej _. .- _ .L I O 0 V 1Q cn C hi *� ' � c . � a) Co cn �Ct ir, (. -- - g i �I-1 C(I - 1 /4 Ucrl m U• '� ✓' i — Z x Ob13N o E i% Oea P `V CD c0 O 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -.J VD a) 1 • �) 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 i I i l U E C c' tr1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 a)c • /� A rtrg .J A. t..1 A.6J A. ,J A.Cr > V L1 O E V O T 41 r P1 r 1 -- .--n• i Hl'' C›O... c.Ci., 4 II V I `�.�..V Ii; 1 I I I Oil /1 E • 4 V 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ _ '� 1 1 ti I I I 1 1 1 1 �„ �.1..1 V o o M. gJ L V L._ A.-- ...4 - I I-• F-~ •W 0 p� O m, a as c) ox ) c ,-� o • Pi 4 � I z g j ,� cn c� co a 0 ^ l 11 - - - - - - i U V uIT-5 I W — � Cz/ Cr) I R Cm) N � CU ET e� C U ' 13 E=-1 rl tt o W O Q 0 W a ( 1-- co Ct o ccn .L, �7 p4 O H _ O N L H1 U W H O (NI • UCr) v •:o U OOw o 'er • �, O W U H ,... cn a' U ci a) W Cn I- -1-' %) g.n ,,,,_'4' z E CL) U . c,J '1,,--cAt • Cc_A.1 11,s ill,. • . ,,,., ,.‘, r_a. 1. 1. t..11....c. •w•r• • = i Q1 E . 4— ,. "-= C.3 -_ , iissualt P.4-; Cit i A.fl Y O 4, CU U °If .. 4_, --,..„.,,, ,z) Cl..) :t'z''. ,...E ..c ,,,) E \ / , /4.20 e i a c. �V w J _ : 1-1 Ir-N C ) \ ;z1._ %) E cN(.3 •_ a. o z o Ow Q0 _ •- O ,ter 0 Cl)V Ja P.) r ...... 0 H U t2 'z E �� U U •N U °' eo V M C!') O�• Z It O Z �' ` , w CIS }•� t .C .�, � � O U; I C.) • _D C7 4 Q ° °' ti v o 7., cn . —1-1 0 W) - z -51 ci, 'I w't, t 'ic 7 -2 ,'7Th Q O w 0.1 U O - O a-.+ N E V Ln co- EiTi ",r:c1 HI Ni e- Nicr) 'X' ''.=`'- '1' ". '—' c' it '--' *u) r-- U • -1 ° 1 •— cA o A kJ ct O CD 1 1 ■'• ••*,11 CC . � ` o . , u C 03 LT, _. I c CD ■�rrrrrrrrrrj� ,� cn CP \ I 1 g, a aJ M It i ;1 1 Mr ' N bIIIthIIH1 . f i ct 1111111111111 � I• 3 • —I i IIll!!!i11 " i 'Tic', ) - , , ti) CID N 0 a 31 . , 4 i- `'i —2. (÷,: E VaDe 7i '4.. . . - - • " " + — O o • 0 o i ,f' ii'' 0 ' • N try N !.Let ,A � . t • t CL 00 CO CD '''''''''Cdp E o) rQ u cn a� ct a) bA , o Ct5 ctS a) c ,_, c� uj „,„ ;,-' `•-•1 -4-' Q vi — w > , •. V c� 'd o Cl� E --..i r"° E 0 -I-4 Cy rt E C b„,C) U •--- up •v-.I U rt O O S Y I Y V 1.1 r•••• ' }' f ri C m 6 O ` I ate+ o 8 F •I A C 4� UI C I , . t Co)1..) ..„--- ---, '5- . , 1p fot 71 E cs ot 4, • _1 Q : 7 to i i t f ' • 4 I ' ' / f ' i ii = I CAS _ ! tN. 111` ' 1 1 A ,�1 0 1lel 1 I I f i Ali .L c: Cr a) ‘il . ! Li i. (NI g O Cr N co CL .1 - i -.r ` i 01 OJ C •I . O •— U ' wU w - .•� ' o -0 V , �, . , , 6 lel? I _gr: 1 I - 0 c1) Ct ,zj 0 V . Q' Q' o, Q C� — CL) -I-, °° v 1-1 v) °' '� V i , 1 8 I E, ...1.- o..c o, 1 t, 1 f r ' , e_. ,.. .., td.c 0 ,,c,) 1L- , 6 . , ,.. , . ,4-.). ,, ......1 . E ^ l , . S dii cn p.0 4� -r.. > • I—I cn , r- C . _ . `� in Ii • . • .1I e Ct "k .t 4 cn c „„, ____ ,., ., .... 0 t r—= 0 1 gn ----1 . , "iz, ..,_.,J• ••1=1 1 i Li.I cn I - ie.., - li z'-- " '5) -0 ccf,,) i 4., , _ ,,, . , -„:, . - c:) cit , k 1 ^, U tn • 1---1 0( W Q LU Cis) N C Z ;-.I • a) -I-1a) •, O Q ' 0 cts o °' 4J i--1 XE c\(-) c-c-7,1 O O �,co H o ° o W U , a) U .s ° 4 `— Q z U �I � � bA � � o .� W .e ci., — ,., ci) c) ,_ QC7C.7d'' u) U •, H � VI N .. Q) r U � = a, -� p •0- 42 = i -- p � � � pp . evl co (I) >% S L o 'I 0 CD _ vs - oco U s x o t/� Cit C� - W v 1 a Q 9 u INI H •Cu) i *.+ U 4- II it i U Co Ct 45 a) 0u t r_o ,_i - 4 in cr 0 0 _. . , t 0 ca) c ' ' -L 0 (1) 7 'E c ' ,� N-0 E CL) C %.- 2 w u fry ' v, clp C) O V m m m . a' a) ♦,, Eo CU a) 1-1-10 I a) II •o e Ct O tea) +-+ a) 'I L . •U ,u �� _ z C CCS +� E N 1:3O i ci4U aJ O a � 0U 0 Coct 1--II m 0 0 / 41 x O Co 0 •A cd •� _+ V Li, co N C 1�� V Z § — t W v^)1U � �� a) U V N N �, o _, Q I C� W I g Z (2) ;_, _1 ) • - ••r-i a) � cc I l 1� a , „., ct p4 0 t ._" I . E • w �, p v W �, U CI) 8 C... Z 7Iti .2 r p9 a) � U �., - z ,... 1—C 1 F. O zi- .- N 7C't .. U . til C0 0 V 41 .—, al rcj C .Cit P. -E :101m: O ..,..4-: 1.2E11 '_ -c Cl)C i -)CI •,-1 > a)N•1...C...it11 ;1 1 Cl)' - cz O 0 ct — H . C) V N V -� co +� .._ :L., I ^ l=-.1 • ...1 7: 1C..; a.)W -1 5 � C ':i cn E u v 1:MILICl) 0 cn a cu Q `n 4i V c: ,c ac A E ° p---i Now r--::: , E "2 .. c C. 1 C' 0 ..1.,, :c1) 7.,, 4 Cit Ct ci) cn ,_c +-J U u. g 1/.1 C CID cicl a) cu H cu Au 7'z, -6 "Ei a., ,.., ,L# , -. , VE. "Ti a) ccl u w C ;II • 0 a) •-ci — 1:1 ,—. ,� a) 5 �O l ,..4 17:: , • .1 .b.c 3 C7 4 H Ci-1 z 5 2 N N . a . .. ON I . cr) qanininiiii M = V I-', ' ii IQA c f1; J__ iIfl 4„1 , a) 8 - ' II t oavl tAn °p r . - i/ - } ' n� g3MIN � V1 CA 1 3 I 'A P- $ iI� M }+ cc 1 co (. - - - i 4 '' 0A_ -' I V /"- - IIIII IIih: 'i I • Co) �- 12 a x o Za% _o Ct PI P it m «, N- tI� i mo a aV m N o ,p/ / fi z5 N _ 0 E C a/ 1 : Ohm 05 ,� t ) ry V) cr i IMO ii m CL) 5_ / L-.°‘ — 6 1 = 0,c F- I a i t/1 i, . Immo s ,,,,. oV U). . - , 1 Q V 0 ; 2 � o --1 E e — -- , • Z I— ViD) r--I V in. • ' co y--I P Ct i n (�.. m 2 \ ., f It bc � cV .., W Cl/ Clio) co ... .. to 03 W ^ t z Rs u O 7:1.., i41‘,: -00t:e.f.,11F.'...1411:.-.s.1 1 4 -.:i i al:' ”:(1)e71 w � - H Clit 1.4 Z. Z. - 4 �` El i .ik 511 b.,. „ U 7J N' g - ,4 E 3 0 a) F— V1 u) • • • uses • • / j III a) cis N O 1:11 t.791 i ., CD u) aj mE VD V Vcn 0 L: z Cr • ,� —' z "79 a, E •,- 4J co;—mi C't cr) ci) U >• 1.; • W +' — Cr• ("CI = I +,IZ::4 romeml O +_ lg •� 1:11: i cn CZ ,�; i 4 ICt Ct m a) � '54 0_ 2 =I 1 E •.— E 100) c.) i.= C a :- cn 4. C.: C.) -0 E J Q co E g Ojj ter+ ,-) Y a ass a r ; N r; a ° q a S hc-i . ;-,i" 'in . , „.1 ,3 . as 3 - * \1jj !fl3111 ' 1ing _If iiiii11 ,. 2 N ...--1 t . , . , i , 1 . C 3 NI +-+ o ,: . 1 it .-- Lt-iji 0- ncLZ \ 1 I / i f, 1 r I .17 . _�` " �-t_1----7C Ct I \ \. `ICJ Q� I / I \ _as O u u CP tw o > a t o , p co w - v+ o c , _ ,n '„ Nat m r Y M V o V ct c 4-4 —I • � a) +, o cn c cti co > cz 0 Q-, cc% O p u • ..1 ;.,.1 --1 '-cii 4t c) = *-Ill U t ii= E � � a) u N U) n �] •00 O t a) C rt cX 2 o ca-i a) •� ' •� 1-1 ~ a) a..) ct Q., a) 'ti cn IL., Ci] ;II 0 0 Z ° cn (cij) °si u ”ci —� � � a) � � " rt MI > � � cn o C 0-1•a W W U W U U Q 'c • .a c �\ � 1 . - -aal ire CV `......./iimPi +i V N � co a, CIJ C 1 w ' Q. rnY / W Y (7 ; um Y a ¢ a) N R am) ` 0 w N in �[ 7 w (V J CU 'a. al U V l7 O 0 s �n v vi E i.i •� CIO) ) ' CU o a W m (C u N � Q 0 Ct — a V v caJo21 s v r^ a 9 VLcLit a� o w rn Q Co CD • C J O N �J�./ OJ�7f 0 Ti O a /� • I T— 1 Yu ^ C '7 O l f'/ • O Y t . A.; , ' , 4 C1) a v lt ' mm; • CLsa LT i G) sN ot jr) 0 . 1 rNz o -ll S Y § r O >% o V . 4' , a Ct '111:1;1 v r° ro ro ro H I� ., co o I ;MIMI til (1111) TT I .11°I C Ili CU CD • o ° r '' til Cr VI 4- aa; " Y 0 o I 1 isCC 0 • C a ' I' Y Q 713 C CC ill ,. j'iNi Irl .' c ',-, - _Jr . oN� ,, T.m 0 N N Cut "tzt Cm: ;imml cs `o Oo tt • z •44 o Z o CD 11 • cv 4.4) •C 4-4 Z O err O I .E o.) , ,� U _ N C 41 CD O of y''°.:'1 Z.. F•- Te C C4 c ) p j ,-.... c...) 1:::mi c..) , tx, F� 3 CC t o Cli) Clit C.) (j) .... p..) .1..4 •,-, cr, g W4 Q 2 O tTh : ; : - 's o °' O 'r'' v • co I W 0.� c c1.1 Iwn•I . .-1- ',-E-4 izt " ' c' ,..z a Cit -6., 'tz..", c...) 4-A • ,..- W No CI) a, (Ni o V a, o� o C CU a) n N r.I- O T, We,4 , 4 ; a -Y ry / , • _ A W 76 c _ Ch — ) . -11i. C • • C V 0 m _W r Ct H '''' Z i sa ,e . -.- .. ,,-.„ . 0 ,--1 C...) 3v; ro : W I - ', ct ' " I 1 r O O E , ,, . . 4 ,.. , . .... C ..._ .., rr 17::::j ,I J E f � 0 N us 1 .'- o - N a) cip w `-' �' i9. 4 Pc) ct V Cil:) Ti I cl) —10 bA (1) 4-' „...N • ....1 ii.-1 ! g u cn cc a) 4 • —' � o tO +6 E ! 00 op '-' co cip V'0-1 ' U o N N �' �,cc5 o U O • --.1 'a a cn , n- , Z 3 a) iUQ n U n F. O It Q D cn 0 CD 17:::: ;111' Imit , , ,., . ..„ N 25. 1 . t:::711 CO . I I - • wtri c D 0 0 -s I It •Cff; CD 3 C N liimii 0 11 • n rn 111(2 CO Cr N • COCO ;11111' lot 0) ID 1;::: Mi 1;:11.11 Cr ;11111 1;:all" ;II: 1 ::LI N V• 00 < N W N ':t • FP Cf IV /� m LA) n� p �' '� y v�' y w V ca S' p' co S' ��; p z. Oo ;1 c1 ::: 1 :2covo C - co co ;llIl •C - -'' se' 'pno - lJliltcn CD to. � '"' p r ,, fp Cl) 4. '-,. ;::—+ Cr ap O • (D QO ti- Z '- " c� n y ,~may.•3 ' N 5. ;-t- rp n :� o C �* cp a) — r+ ,--,•• -t. --t z ••• z rD E ••• z cn• c:4 '' I71: o CO S coo - r0 v' Cr) N ;111' iim w O CO o Z n coo C. • rt o 1 o I Om coo c~p• • "Z ''. tir•••..., NI ' CD 1....i ' O o n �. O cp oon� '� ~ •Ill = ,rt �C A ~ • • o ^+(D . Z., N z, n r+ N n' C� `-r' ro o co co cu iv o' r O n o C Q. ' I . n a -0 n rg �� . * ,..,' m. 0 Ft-, .),) ;4, r..., ,...,. ,..4. ,..," ,--i. n n N• .) CD �• d WO N co • Z• oCr • z.. ;111Doo z Q et coo o. cp n �7 o rt n �-- Cl) �- Z., S, S co Ivcep Or O ,�U a C cn 7.miPo 0 � `�• o ~• '� Z - . H Cr " d g C 0 Cr A.) Q Cr) Cl) Cr `C on : n ~• 11.11 -0 n I . `C CD n ° rn 3 C as) CDQc�CD c 0 P A N - a 5• W ' () U 01? W 3 -0 � m = ,< m � mc°o5 oR � � 3 �' 3Cm �_ pa _mm <15 o � _ fD 3C maw Eli o °e' s - pc3g. _, ¢7 c55 � . cph m ,. m 0• p ° o(on _a = CO ? c C (D 3 -• N -, SD uj .n-r (D --() 0 C o coc, ° D 5 r` 1-0 A u -► 3 ii1:3 M- (D .� .. CD m O5 ' 0- w p (D (D c N + . ' <,_ S n m n -. = ° 0 a .0 . aam ' ° °CI a Z . 03 �� cN - OP vmCam' 0 m -0 ' - - 3 o m *) v c 0 a - r, pC m w a ' - 0 m m = 9) 3 D c m v a O ¶ 0 N 0 w _ (c • 5 (ND rh , °_ co52. < �, a CD c... - (-IC 0 CI c - (n 5- -- c D) ,gym = • 5' I = �- m 0 0 • - x OCO ° m 3 • o O C) c x = * a • N < D -o (n = a) g Q ' cy a `" C • a ' CI m w rn . .► (n N w m C O a 1 m C -0 * 5. o ° � ( 0 (D m p 3 21 : � m O u. n. o •• a = m 3: m m a, c.+ ' a ow !I.'. 73 * D cO 0 (CD a m a U • • S N 3 m — O a N C m m 3 X O 3 N j N N N O ' Q Ot CU• (D 3 c -0 ,--- a (aD ¢) 3 w (D • = a A rD S = (D c (D ° O C N • `< (D ID m 3 � g 5- 3 -0 D• j 1 a (n �' ° ; moon (D 0 c 8 = mua ' 0 � p , c � vc = W j _ Omm �• m � S 11) r VI (Q co cn �0. 0 (p Q 0 7 3 a 3 S � ma vf"h CJ (Q (D gl1 N \ w `< (.0 \ 0 07 Pi; Cn Z n -fv, < < < v co pm n - ? s r9 07 Iv Cu S f• �pry OI O a) et 0CL0 ' � o 3 CO �• n ccdrsi p3 l�I �y c ro r. r. - ? g `Q 7 - < - n77ro z l z a d Cl) 0 s, n ° o (� a . 3eo l ' _ no Cit 0 ' `"' N `off CD (I) O - 5 V n o tp CjgC .ccw =' z. D = (11 D C a N (JD 7 � ooacm v C oO L) N 9, O frD a, 9 g r ^ UM IDv 6ci:o � � 9 N % CD jQ '° § '5 r (g, . ro RI I. i tt i 14/4 • co r I o V1 s.o � �o •o ,00 0 o00U7) iga �r/h 4) 00 co N O 1017 O A ^ �j • o ! I N N A r W 0 C I� c.) C V,Y • O• NQ� A o, �OOw OO . C W GG aa rn x c c c c c c c c c c tfl " C e E z C C co 1 > > > c I; u+ •n In v� VI In in in VI v+ > Yr O u — b O I-'t Q �ow a cg ♦ b�, ''ID O - N N N .+ O •• r Dlimisl 000 L., et, V wOr f •V1 V CO V V V NJ to A .• .+ nCO O /► n n f�1 fit (�1 n A f�1 • [. ,,..f r '�,.1 i` C 2 III:, , %, '.113 tit , ,•••.„ ... ._. _ NJ •-• . •-• NJ A 0 OO• O, N .• V A IJI 4.0 N LA _ •• � V+ O V1 ivV A W O tJ+ CD . il� ^, 1.7 fl . y Gdt. �' CO , r� • = ;.:1-+ ' rD CD 6 1 v CrQ n 111,.. . , i----0,E , ci, • C) j � � �CM O r I � � 0 O Pk.) o a. 1 v j K � .� li• .,; o �rr IN) co • K o�, C o I Cr S 4. 4 tir.AH. A. c co 1 r n .1CJ 44 r )n n - , I A1'--1 -4 CO CO C) r^ r T;• � (D �A O � 3 V J � /� �0 f °S �.7 0 - • l - C C . m o 111141°. nCO > '•' .i m Cr •I ,. ///// f a 4 �'fr . . „ , z n *4 2 ;1 4 O C 0 CD 4 Q D oa) - Cn 0 ...� ;,1' Cit CD pLi H w ;11' 0 VI Cr o ;11. cg, 0 V Cfq co a) ,CD Cilli ri.o . co ;..., ... 0 , (D 3 0 C •;: ry >_ o o -4 p m cocc ;1111 co 0 »� -D � 33xp x 0 vco C Z V1 5 ° QNCu N7C o 3 C - �• N2) rTI r > N 0 C �� 0 O cOD co O n N 3 E con 3c0. cg 3 11 a '< 0 * -; 2) w0) a omen C .. 0 0 _. � m 3 Oo CI ° 7.11/1 • N.-, m u � qv w ~' w o0a m 3 0 n � � O an Vm.tv � � if cn m "._ i_i 0 Q 3 `° o w � 1 0 Ko o p17: (/� C� a --• C3 j 1 O ' < \ ) m jco pt N a Q C N C (D o ro 0 ? r, o cq �� a� m ;III' C 0 N 6 V'cn O Q3 N 1�� cn � m 1.N °' C � o ul En ;Iii ir\ QN - 7 mccD .. 6 — �pp0 O O x 7 "' co CD p�j O. C ,01 07 cD (OD cD 5 ..(r-NICC) (D �• � � c' Q NN a aTs ~ ' 1 .: to ul ,.F• C 5 a 5 O. a, C cD O N N CD an (r - c Q ° p •• a CJ co C) (D pO can a wN N � O Cr Ilt 3 � �0 a 0 3 N 13 7 0 St Ft; O N NO _. a a * m 0 - m • 00 Z a a o -o * o cl o < 0 o �...�I aT W N Cl) Z '•+' Ccl„,, , „..- ',..J 1;1•11:LI C/) CD PO ci) (/' ;11: 0) ! < 1-•• n " ,_,_, . . . „, a O R'° 1;:::-1 Cir o cf) 3 (-) 4 ;11: ;11., px Qw 0. p <, ._ wC <, w < 0 cn R- ;:111 I r1 < o nv < v , 0 � a . 0 7tu - 0 00 = - (c00 - n ^ D NN Ow if H 0 5 -. n ,;:_, 0 7 7 .y - ,.. D XIcr, a _ imp.• Q 3 CO , . a cam ? m � 0 . 7cD � 0 0. a3a OIiII w 7 ;LI n = w � aO � � ` C a' s 7 0 cD O 7 7 . �� ct t ,_ w 0 w OCID ;11.: m G 'O O w a 0-.c C ! O eh" E. A 'O 0 a O 717::: 2 N cD 'dO Nw0 X Ii LII ca ~•G � aw = a_ c_nca c0Dp �� � c w rn a Qa ~ a0 CD- cu = 0 OCDC c (D � a w v27cD 0- (D C -w 3 7 F. 3 Q 7• cD 4: w 0 co n C a n .< s 7 t7 ca$ �yE • 8 O o5 n) § a c cn ? n a) p 0 (0 wcnO ;111' J ,C.� Oc = -0 sl w O cD D j -0 w (f1 _! L. rink Z 3J CD • -0 2 0 W tD - w alinimi ('1 � � w C v c� a c -a-0 7 cD c o g • c":"LI O N 7p =• � aC co aD iov = NO •< -'< CL ;1115 ffl us 0 D- gz* HH nai c O < 0 ji 5. = cp m CDD'' � � C� 6 o c � � C� cD cD 7 _ c C 1 � -< CD w 1R000 I,-0 ? 0 Aa �• w _ w � Nc _ < � Q(CS 7 w w �c at) c ? w 3 O- O 3 n w 7 cD a I 3 7 CO n -. (II O O is ID O co "Ig 7 Co ? Q O w J 7 w ' 0 Cr c°11 " ' D`� fn "D r Cr _ .. O. CTt o a fND ..< CDa- cwn 3 70 s 8 a)w ;11 -CI cn t::,-....- FS•F C G w %G rINININA V Cl) d 113 = C- 7 D ° �'M cn o 0- VIn n w n P o i IL RIo 0 0 0 c::::LI I ' 71- * .... --;(1,44, 4 w * ID I 2, '..c C.1 1;:..1 w .rt , ID cm P Cr < c • cy ..., j = te, �-, i ' • _ _ - 1 �,�c \, Icc , �� S , !i 1i : .00,00°1\4116.- ; Iip li..7 0 I• . I 1 s V O. � 3 0 °a° 3 fr° a rD 0 ' • 1. ^ o Boa < o < ,„..::: a N Z C �D Z J low . IIIIII 0, ;Co) CD 7 — M. / N r ii 1ozS j- I ? ,' ? E c.:111 fD• F 0 i rid -/ ii ;iI—' . , F i-. § < i , ; i ,6 - ) ' = 73 co Ilip C u- = °t O 5• 1 1 �° tt _.... 1 yy vi O I'r 7 Ai _� cu ='" ' I7 C 73 (gyxi p �= n �. _ , to � � 7/4. ' Saiii**K" - ti 0 rt ht 1 c � ejI W � k , O i ;• ` 1 ciD ' 1-1 C ; O z 7" d z O TI< � o CID 0- r II ` f . . I Arf c %< 0101011/F C I 1;21 r'1 ; S Cr crqI 1 = . il__,..e. , % ' gli ? i'D I / n = o_t _ . ..... V ' gill (,) P1 rro V; ' * 0 I n c 5 CD 4 . , 1 'n17: • Cr - .-t $ i, *.- Z f f O R.° CD E,71 m Cfc? I) ri t ... ,,.. I i H ';: 1 H 1 a ! "0 E I . C I. •f ' ,./ 1 y « 1—. • 1 0., ..# I , - —r+ VIP• , _ �`�`: ';:::-1 O°= 4 / — ---- - f �. . c y 1' , -ow cr.) =' - !i Xi C tiOr A it eL 0 l'i si , - -,-1 -T 6... 1 5. n co n Hfl O cNN QD 7 7 0 itri fD C Q. d co N > 5 �.i v, , a•Cl) a cQ cG X lit) .� to 3 o ' V't w C 0 i. = - cr CD 7: m •C . - , f Dm ;1'''' 2 I � o C� ciD 1 v g i • p . n Qt:17111 ii NCir cn 0 c W O" Ihl • Z C O O O rD Cn _ V J 8 '10 m M rn J co o CID I. Q. •• ��Wcc 15 L�KODO MC �to J CD CO ym C CD � CD r > fTtQ-CNN COfT V N �'N m. C -.IO NIMIIM ; CD N ' "o Uri O� -.1 • 33 1 n O IN%;0 P 5 ' • CO CU « 07� N * * .0 K*O O O . 0 W� n � \ TW(n� TN 9-- ciii0)\1: CIIID O �• � �� ° 03 W ° NK ®INI� 7IN1 • CW < .s� OCON CD n 3. °.IN C. OT E. ' (a cn O /rt A. co 1 N O_ N O f° O .. O c °•am i3 m � m `°I tim' C� I M Q c@W3V ° aco I —Ng0'�N C:7 0� 90 0 C0 T a � �01 ® OOn y ? o 0� 01 Cir w Cn '0 fD Z1 ' CD CWTi o CD N -o 0 on a .� a W Z. iri �� ° n CO N O. y` f0 ©� 5I rf N �. W� O w S •Nj 4,Pi. ;1111' O5 cn o m cnm wc1111.1 l/1 co A r"h f° W 1 7 1CD a //m `CD ce,: i coN CrON • V1 . 0 O O D- Cij PD ri PD ri Z 1 _ _ -,______ • Uo co n N0.0 W 1) _ D C✓�Dcf) ' = ri- -_ U�0 1 .....• 1—t i—t 1—t 0 ,—, • . If I--; n 8, , . , , ,.< ,-t , J 2.) ! um ,< 0 , 0 c * 4 4 4 H g 1 4_,_\ I l 6 0 0 , ._rt „0,1 : „....... k:,.,, ..,,:ik , o , ..... .7 i Pf2 ) .• r<u -• - • O 1 N tt 7.1 1 ! .N.) ripr,-., 4--.%) CD (- = i i an •.- (— = Icz' I F—, r-t- 0 / ... 1— • I- 8t. N y1 E-E: -0 1-it ,...„ C y IHIHHhi/ '! G g �v „ • < n 1 0 'CS3 10:11 if IIIIIIi ' GA 0) E I * H i' l vii 6 6 s ; (lit ? Q C .-, $ 5 r.......)-ml CD Els Cf, if 2 2 ;i:§ S 1-t a If ^• 1 Cn 71• x2._, fD - - _ _ a O co —I N 6 ~o_ = N 5• F-- co N- - til -.. _a�_—__�a... W 4, 4, . IN..) I � � NOO � cD D 1 › � O 00 �1 1 00 �7 �l �� tt CD s r i �' L ,� - 1 ! IA n , • og; .. 1.'' .P), , 0 I--" H < : ' • St .I,. I bill\. t3. i r:: ''. . ' •.... • 0 9 ••••-1 0 7 . a"' 1 . ' ::: P Irr �' C�1+.. , - ••• ' t: +. ?i: S • o riIA• U, � friiiiiigirrr �' ,_ . N aq �. ,� r�1rirrrrrr11 X < CD r rrii111111111 . It 1 On C� (� 2(IWiiiI!IIii ',Q Cn .1 ) 0 4 , 0- cp i•-•1 1,__1 ii r-r NJ4 / I / r. (� P lino= • IIi c ! 0 cro it 0_ a mnimi1 • Z = 0 1—o ' N un c o W 'rip' n co 3 o n o' er- O � n 1- • S 0 1 10 E._, IfV.I. co .2., 1-d •.6 1-7; a) 1.___, 5)'. ci c v �• - .....• 0-" 1 "." r-1- \...0 n 7t E 3 �"' ' ' f �• NCD 1-7 CD W„„.„..„ r , , , --t. oc c Q 9 —% n 8 ,-.t __,..- c.,.., .1 ct, . ,... f+ PO I—i. = tt a) UP w �, ;ID FL o 1. W N g^ ;ph rili qi I i = ;: : - . .„ e ‘11,7 •'. c1 Crq cr r) rf ell Pi ,-. F %) -::„......,,k .. ., " ?,..i .;"'- 7., w-^r-1 _ a. _ si.... ir 1.) CJl UU! r ' ter'.. ' - • m riq ..,. .s; r m i IA f g— ' - i ? a _ •A)„' 1 i 1P- ;:. rDM ii. d I ; a . -4 iwi_ r i. r T F�11'' — I W • V 1 P c ; � z � O � z 0 cr s . vit d u9 co = pn n @ , o Ch O c to' � w + CD 9 Cr cD E n n) . tr' v 0 s. r* 101 1- • , C D O - N <v,o j; lila VI rAl - ',:• § 1; : . ID ~ 0 F . h , = ;ID ! § C") . '•1) Ilk illit- _ , . __. , .... . rp C cu ,..h .r N �° � • 60 a 0 /' i t o , Up al CD F g w g N V ` ,._, , ' t O ,,._., , x ► AN 0 ';2.1 1,/ \ Y' ;.D Cf) Cr 2 vi cn -' v l ^l V1 n n C- Pz � � n � R° cnn � CD d0 0 ° CD'-o ,-,•• $1),., p.) ..„ ,-- , cl) N p o0 ,., Q.) ,--t- ;:: _• - X np' Cr - cGR � a) co cD O Q, C, , CD a � 0 n C• p d ° —I 3 0 CD Wolff cn `C a r Cr E o W ►.-,• _ CD , ° 1.) IVC!Q , 0 CD jC) VI .-1 t.-1 C y177/ 17 ItCD i c —• 0 ". _ S' I 0K :t ) - 1— e--* it O _R cil g'° . • 7.41 1;17f C9 C4.1-.. . ii , ccnn �'n . ' 1 i ° _ CL ° ' 1 k: ;:-I C O I _— F- • 2 Cr ter _ � . o ^ —, ; 11 i C.) - C 1 LC t7i i m A� I--rJ a r r"' q _ • 5 c J (. CID Gk,f pot Daft Y-i r H ..., _—R, c Q L j I 1 t..P. mod'e�Z a7�4.1 a r Cr Cr D (D - N - F. R Z / ' 1 k 4 • 40011„. - ,, 7 r r ! .+ T , • I " / L AL. O a rp I,i: i. . ::. : . -, . '. C.1 E 3 ^C #111 ° .I -.....44 (IT1..— � c CD A v t ' T ' - - - '1tr n ,r ' . ' vt w tiff. .�. ,, , , . �-- C?,_V'7 F _ s _ ,_ • , 6 0 , , , ,.. , , . ,,, c , 4' - . #,,i : - W o �` - ' I p c,, .., 6' —i 1 Lf _ a) ... , . ! , _,,, .., 4 , . c.,-, _ :., . . • CU Ty t 1 , - x ,' ,� ' I r"F v ' n Z Cr O --i 4 —11 up up = ......... .. ci) _. s n n r+ ,• i f_i. i C C � o 0 oO < OOi`, �. � Qo c, riP (IP a) 1.+1 $-1- ›. 1—ic ,) C-.3 Z.) cni cn 1 -1 ° et' ;11: C E oill‘ ..,0- e 11:4-1 " i- 7-r: E 2 a) 4 : I'd 0 `< $1) 0 rD trl C - , 1 • h-t .g. o 0 1-i ,_:," p+ I-•• • O -10 . a Z') n cn '9 -% ' a n ° = P.) o O • 1 rD 3 _ • vi r.D I I4 Wo-t 4 c:-.) 1-1 p.) 0 M...r� I I n ;I: icf4 glit gc, :-+ I—,. ' . r-+ rD cn aD C Cn a) > 1;211------- bpi ;:ILi ;ID 1- ,..,,-1 • r. i:•:T_: 4 0_, -N,D)) Cr / . ' ' Clq 1.11 I' l 0 • C (D C Imat Cn • Ch PO , $1:4 a - , Cr) E? PO "Zi Ci) IN) I' cn f1`• O A a) ti-- f e 1 n 4. mL z• zm mC :D zZ ON cnF m 6133HS E133HS m Z { Z133HS40 Or* _ 1/8/HX3 Q 81/8/HX3 ;b 1/81HX3 m i- s 4 Y':.v' S. map11 ' X ~� ..� iftl- • -fi41:.:16 — R4 x= o me z- 07-1 zm m �D z zZ co el s ` N D OTT - s ril m.,D s < .cA A S < -s < o_ ...3 < h xow< �cwAA Ih! m'O -myO so_ --,- ..D e OD O D Om �O mti0 Z oL^AZ: £z WG - rZ7JZ ,y. cz!O-O m�D " _ xoTW xoaW..._lH*IIII wO vyymx L^ m- m w- wm A L^xynm .._ OT"Ti oT 1 mmom, z -. x�,ai yea oc'� _ � • i! �-ximc -xi�w � wSs D0. gy rg D .,..gs DOW _ < g_`D v' gs Z. ''e8 A`` m = 3- 0 ' •( / 4 11747410 , ./446-0464//414 ;, . . .� .1))f y i. S <ria.. < 7C •S < 3 3 3 <._ • D D ' 1 co r. co D z'�N z• 0 Z,1id 0 'o z .S T. P•m. m`''�A,6 0,o0 hIm ,Ii 0 _1T _ O •m DZ DCp m. Oi mNnA AtZ A o w D' . OwD2 xo73 W O y�, w7j mLIm1 L^xyr: Ln• rmN ^' < OO Ov-,{ OLno i =F 0 . xz wSi. m r omOTs arw C wC ,az C S ,gi 0 Szwo D 1 .� -'7 xwAp d z_ S.�oz CO Cr W rD'z CO y._? W1 gat. Z *. m Tr A •. ~y N 0 r_ ' g> 0 1..s CO D CO D CO Z T y 4 09D r ttk c i O O 5 M ....,, I N_ ' - .1Wil 1°' 44_,. , 2 „ _4 ' r �. 41 . i ` '� �• .�� a ' _ .. `t. cTo 1,*. 1'- •1- - � .. ..AL Y, .• c- `. •• lib .ems .� aa /. 4� :� ' .' :i t 41`t, a-',T- -! 't Y� •_ M '' T. ' rS. Irr,, ,._1. 144 '.. • V r4-4.111-i, r •'•4. , I ,OF Ago,. ,,,.°SA 471 , t.• ,_,-/•_1,-- — '-' . V%--- - ipir . -ir, li Ti1.:. 17‘" .1( ---s ..e.4- . . - ,vir ,. t411" " 'r- /, i.• ' -Gi* GIs ' - - �( ,� - i. R' ' is• ' Q ` I' lw t_ . 7r a js ?� 7 ' F; • z a it 1 t' t og mC_ Z- mC m r S D r y ._ o S m 20 O D 2 m S. -Oi A 2< .S. Cp. •� C Z T x°m; -°i- 1 sz Di a D 0 O ElF a a 0.12 r; `2,D..,` 'SF N �A c m � �_ A c C) x � S mx8� co 2 r_ma20 �N co ZD �A r El Ur ^A tiN � yo L�nn �Z ti�, v.-, r. rt8� =2Nm LnyO,my gZ N gm..m3 ;muT rmy O1 az C gz y r en,;g8 l ximc��0 ra-m Sac$ D < mm(rITI v xo D mein x°c m o v N'ym I°xyD =pPW x°wD xx�nn=�AA �xn°�'O gx-,D xoy Z.xoalZ mvm0 2rzoo ?,z I ,-mm, xmN-< rm.,s D OIOZ xom r mod 31 W 3xoZ xmz°f� mx�fn�mxC c�mocl i"-'OO �� _ °y _.—< xv '< 8a n �5Sm � y�-1 xr2› �oair zEar� yim2 yiir-ngg=moC1 y582 -1,1 qqs 1 mx-a>iq-1> VmoD 2 yNA $j cW by N-I yaiW4 ~4W u~yD xmto,-,xmy 4Ro, o mz 7� W.o�PC ;ym1 yc�83 3 E W T_ WT 8 2 8 O 2 g n +'`'>4rw0 8z m by m � Rn2 ,N A �aO 0 e? i d i 8g $a 0T $s d�-a m 8a < 8a m 8? 1I 0 sz s 8t x, gs ct P.. # , . 204 g m w m 1i1m ":,4T3, if. - __., . . . _g 8 wF `. 1 •A ..."".. a 4.4„ . .,... . 444. , s \ - . Jam' 7 •['' ' t Val > oft „�' NIA. m =p m .is c y 2F �_ yF n 0... w �F T' -OiF � 's 5 n.- O 1 21,1 14 m CO tiN CO O IT -iN I. CO D c0 n tiN Z mZ Z y7io < tiF �< sz Ms.CO Dz C c0 y go Qig2 Z az 7tiN D r9 CO < J Tic) D J Fm..,r ^_ Z ai DD ;g1: �m.y xoym �maC go oHD rmarr cO O,. y';mmmrr .. w= � x tiN G rm.,yZ m � ax°wC L^xtim xOHZ x°wD x�m xON ��m�� Cp < x°�' D 171 r mxy 'n..:ti m x°m G � Oi....mxti m0 @xlitn EI881 � o_ mOy °-v om0 m �xOy �pm =�An' �S-yl G �mm y LICpr9 my>m02 m,,.A HE> m x ama O_pD xc�-5 z< oEp� A O D� D 5 cn xoa= xyW z.Ecm .,xmA xO_r •+xmr yam_ ,,O_ xm tix'm cmo xv'„D xc,igZ< I -�xm2 mxti_ xngC� tim;l� m- tiNr yyO xmm �rmm �mrr xnPC L^x� � m - tim0 or.or ~'NAF 8z D,$i•am0 . D D u�y< 0 $ DJtix0E x3E3 �wm ri; c xoai a c-I 8a z $.• y tf < o. O 8� „Z Z 'IMZ a m m 11 . z O) ,xmm bz rco - 7c 8a $a 8a ry8's ,y s r1Oz z py�Z 8 0 mi r r " Q - 2 ( n '"': ^-ram m ! ° F j}' r a a m1. cn m > a n - Y ' 2 C 2 2 2 m �. 0 m m m • • tii�l a3 V_is, - ,10 •. .,i • �g ; -�'•rI VANDERBILT DRIVE i .. j �4 •+y J C vii-...if;0 ,•a alir ` .1.. yre 7.i • .a; �� i ; ,-t, "Si +Ira a vie L�. _ _ '0 _ fir e -1 . ? _;$dr",. — ..,,, . .f, - , 7 . . , - 'sty:A ',----A.---1-.. .r._•P -'11• aii•!• _ : ' • •,11 1,,-1. —. 4.4,-. _4...i, lir:. , • I '".jIr . .1.0." - ms.--- 2r.......:r • }: mL z. z• mC )3D -- .____. .. . .. .. zZ ON m kO.,. r; Sp0 Sp0 Spp S S•M S1ii ��N^ iIT m ~2 D -1 2 D 1 C 2 D i C 2 D q= y Z D< ~= D o's^ O se D^ ym <� Do -I x H <x Dm <� ;m <�{ a m -i x ›m C SxA ym 1 n 2W y 0 ppp ';13gn mm41n xer?DW xm#yW =2tiDm SmNDA xmPM gpz A42 UPJ . goyim..DvO W L)y<O 0i<D E54<p E O y<r m Q N<S 'IFT,<r�1 0;y n 442 rmi+A m y h y3,A rl2raa ills ai0AD 0 ..P'•il Om y$T r< 8mNOGx Ner NOwTO� m� - $om Oi'NO TN ' Zyg zrg Z g zx' SeOO .geNZO cb, O m yy w2 NAMm 8g <D g <m 8 <Zg <m 88 jA $o <z.,, uZ 8— F "aez ram..: \lo., _ ytir- G Y r s d-in' ,; irlifiC:::.!'i4 .-A ` a -1 , ♦ ^y N D < M ODN^ W Sx`AON xCN cTc.f• j0 ��2 Ati O�m2-i W��' r)Z W 'y ti N T N y 0 A 1 , ;a x N m p 11�r� xm .t $rm-+r_m �u�iGy m�y�tiN� _ ? 1, S2p�I� V erA 99-z D -, ad � •7mymZs ey' - 'tl 'C �„ = N < f al / �VANDERBILT cm 1< cm 1 cn .y^ Z • a'Oz D oo COW �o WD`^o WG"li-'z z �. - _ �xeDmgD .�z O, sz0 m ,�O Wx _,m Dn Om D›}_,z m f.O Ox. SLn < mm y Scr°'i rm A x "'Dm FO n rD-o Do D11142'.... . c�i0O O� D L^xyx xoNoo "-' N<-i xxaxy x °'SDY °'=yt/r,"''"NAD 220C1y 2y0n,12•Ei m m2'tr 0=0nA mmy D mmy D mmN Dy,•,3OtiW "--"° -t AOm 0A<1G1r�01 2� 6< 3 �2,g !„,.'yx013,? r�" � �mrti.N�mrA ~xmW SNA ti AOm ;�20 � L7x0 tp 20 tiA� '>N N N HN : m2 ti.+m r i, yyAO y :4,2 G 1' 2"�mQD 5"W D7 O Z':m Oz S u8m m m D ti �z . wo a. gym NAz. pm�z wA �Se mDN] VIL" ` .� 8 8 <D j ee'p' -‹ -D N� f. m ' Z o e Wig o c f/i o 0 o N D i 8 D< it a1 iv 8 s D e e < m m e o m m e m m c> :_ ---41 .. /vim y` D* �: z _.� _A. ' I_ „rid y H W' y.�.. W '� yl�r i..... . ., . •. •4 � - , `�� a �rY• • � •1 Id$ . 141 4 - .., 4 • it 6 114 .- ,4:-.---isti,-.,,--, ... ..,oisk ....,... ..,. . . , .... , ... . , 4. ,t, itt .• s_... -4,-,c•-, : tCf4 rq A • .r tr ..ail., ! . .R i7 •'2�I Ei $m sK og WOODWARD, PIRES & L OM_ BARDO, P.A. EST.1971 ATTORNEYS AT LAW MARK J.WOODWARD September 28, 2020 Board Certified:Rent Faille Via Email Lawand inCa iorninnun& Planned Development Law ANTHONYP.PIRES,JR Collier County Planning Commission Bccol CeniBectic 1Xoun0 Edwin Fryer, Chairman edwin.fryer@colliercountyfl.gov and Local Govern ent Lena, and J.CHRISTOPHERLOMBARDO James Sabo, Principal Planner James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov Ei wrtt Ceni&cxS Manna andp3mayl tw Collier County Zoning Division ANTHONY J.DIMORA LkermdinFt.and O11 Re: Objections To One Naples Project In Vanderbilt Beach; Applications LENORET.BRAKEF1ELD PL20190000696 (SSGMPA) and PL20190000697 (PUDZ), (collectively the "Applications"): Objections and Concerns Regarding The Applications CRAIG R.WOODWARD Senior Cxnasd Board Certified;Real F ,teLaw Dear Mr. Fryer and Planning Commissioners: KENNETH V.MUNDY This law firm represents the Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association, Inc., a ZACHARYW.LOMBARDO Florida not for profit corporation ("VBRA"), which has continuing significant concerns CAMERON G.WOODWARD relating to the One Naples Project ("Project"), The Project is the subject of the above ROSS E.SCHULMAN noted Applications and a pending ROW Vacation'. Lioereed in FL and NY SHAYS.RAJA SOME BACKGROUND AS TO THE VBRA Licensed in FL and DC The Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association, Inc., ("VBRA") is a Florida not for profit corporation in Naples, Florida, 34108, established in 1997. The object and purpose of the VBRA is in part: "....to encourage and promote the proper development and maintenance of Vanderbilt Beach and surrounding areas as a choice residential and recreational community and to take whatever actions may be deemed necessary to achieve such REPLY TO: purpose; including, but not limited to, the presentation of the t 3200 TAMIAMI TRAIL N. Association's points of view to appropriate governmental or SUITE 200 NAPLES.FL 34103 other bodies". 239-649-6555 239-649-7342 FAX 1:1 646 BALD EAGLE DRIVE 1 Right of WayVacation Application, PL20200000368 (ROW Vacation), Bywayof a SUITE soo 9 Pp� P.O.BOX ONE September 15, 2020 email from Marcus Berman, the County Land Surveyor, I have MARCO ISLAND,FL 34146 239-394-5161 been advised that the ROW Vacation has been scheduled for two County 239-642-6402 FAX Commission meetings, with the first on November 10, 2020, that sets a tentative www.WPL—LEGAL.COM hearing date of December 8, 2020. See attached Exhibit "A". A separate letter objecting to the ROW Vacation will be forthcoming. 1 The boundaries of VBRA from which its membership is comprised are as follows: on the West, the Gulf of Mexico; on the East, Vanderbilt Drive; on the South, Vanderbilt Beach Road; on the North, the Cocohatchee River and Wiggins Pass. At the present time there are approximately 950 members of the VBRA residing within its above described boundaries. The Project is located within the boundaries of the VBRA. The VBRA has been very active on this and many other issues that significantly affect its members and the Vanderbilt Beach Community. No rights, concerns, arguments, positions or objections of VBRA concerning the Project are waived by anything stated herein or omitted herefrom and the right to present, make and submit additional motions, objections, arguments and materials before the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and Board of County Commissioners (BCC) is specifically reserved. VBRA reserves the right to make additional objections, filings and submittals to protect its interests and to ensure the due process rights of VBRA.2 PRIOR CORRESPONDENCE On August 24, 2020, before the Staff Report dated September 24, 2020 concerning these Applications was finally circulated to the members of the Collier County Planning Commission ("CCPC") and made available to the public, I submitted a letter outlining the "Initial Objections and Concerns Regarding Applications and Submittals" of the VBRA (the "Initial Objections"). The Initial Objections letter has been included in the Agenda Packet starting at page 1851. After review of the Agenda Packet, I reiterate the matters raised in the Initial Objections along with additional issues, objections, comments and concerns outlined in this letter. OBJECTIONS, COMMENTS AND CONCERNS 1. A THRESHOLD MATTER: THE APPLICATIONS SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC AS THE APPLICANT DOES NOT OWN OR CONTROL ALL OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THE APPLICATIONS. z Since the time that the Developer first announced its Project, and up to the present, VBRA has had significant concerns about the scale and scope of the Project. VBRA has been and continues as an active participant and stakeholder, advocating for and advancing the interests of its members and the Vanderbilt Community, monitoring the applications, and their various iterations; including meeting with the Developer and its representatives. VBRA has, on multiple occasions with the Developer over the last three (3) years, voiced the concerns and objections of its members regarding the Project to the Developer and its representatives.While the Developer has revised the Project in various aspects,in its present state, VBRA objects to and opposes the Project. 2 The named Applicant and Owner is listed as Vanderbilt Naples Holdings, LLC, While Vanderbilt Naples Holdings, LLC. is the Applicant, it is not the owner of nor in control of all of the property that is the subject of the Applications. The Applicant owns only 4.63 acres of the 5.42 acres Project site as approximately .79 acres of various street/road right of the 5.42 acres of the Project site is owned by Collier County (see Exhibits "B-1" and "B-2"3 ). It is clearly stated in the ROW Vacation Application that Collier County is the owner of the approximately .79 acres of various street/road right of way within the Project site. The Applicant is only the owner of 4.63 acres of the Project site, consisting of other platted lots and parcels. The Applicant is not the owner of any portion of the .79 acres of County owned street/road right of way that is the subject of the ROW Vacation. An amendment to Collier County's adopted Growth Management Plan ("GMP") may be proposed by any private person,"...provided , however, that no such person shall propose an amendment for a land use designation change for property which he or she does not own, except as an agent or attorney for the owner." See Section 3 of Collier County Resolution 12- 2344, copy attached as Exhibit "C"). To my knowledge there are no documents in the SSGMPA Application or submitted materials that designate the Applicant, its agents or its attorney(s) as agent or attorney for Collier County for the SSGMPA. In order to effect a rezoning of the property from "C-3"to a planned unit development "PUD"), the County's Official Zoning Atlas has to be amended. According to Section 10.02.08A and B of the Collier County Land Development Code ("UDC", copy attached as Exhibit "D"): 10.02.08- Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas A. Purpose and intent.The official zoning atlas may,from time to time, be amended, supplemented, changed or repealed. Procedures shall be as follows: B. Amendment of the zoning atlas. A zoning atlas amendment may be proposed by: 1. Board of county commissioners. 2. Planning commission. 3. Board of zoning appeals. 4. Any other department or agency of the county. 5. Anyperson other than those listed in 1.-4. above:provided, however, that no person shall propose an amendment for the rezoning of property (except as agent or attorney for an owner) which he does not own, The name of the owner shall appear in each application. (emphasis added) The "Right-of Way Vacation Request And Public Benefit Statement" and the legal description and sketch of the .79 acres, both submitted as part of the ROW Vacation. 4 "A Resolution Establishing General Requirements And Procedures For Amending The Collier County Growth Management Plan". 3 To my knowledge: 1. none of the persons listed in Section 10.02.0E 1- 4 above have proposed any amendment to the official zoning atlas for the .79 acres of County owned road/street right-of-way to rezone the County owned road/street right-of-way from "C-3" to a PUD"; and,2.there are no documents in the materials that designate the Applicant, its agents or its attorney(s) as agent or attorney for Collier County for the PUDZ. In addition, Section 4.07.01 of the LDC, titled "Unified Control" (copy attached as Exhibit "E"), requires: A. that "All land included for purpose of rezoning to a PUD zoning district shall be owned or under the control of the applicant.."; and, B. "The applicant shall present competent substantial evidence of the unified control of the entire area within the proposed PUD district..". The .79 acres of County owned road/street right-of-way is neither owned by or under the control of the Applicant. There is no competent substantial evidence of the unified control by the Applicant of the entire 5.42 area within the proposed PUD district. Thus, as an initial threshold matter, by virtue of the plain, clear and unambiguous above cited sections of Resolution 12-234 and the LDC, VBRA requests that the CCPC reject the SSGMPA and PUDZ Applications as being deficient on their face(s) and reject any effort or attempt by the Applicant to amend the GMP Future Land Use Element("FLUE") and Future Land Use map ("FLUM")or to rezone any of the .79 acres of County owned road/street right- of-way depicted on the attached Exhibit "B-2". 2. THE PROJECT SHOULD BE DENIED AS IT IS NEITHER COMPATIBLE WITH NOR COMPLEMENTARY TO THE SURROUNDING LAND USES A. POLICY 5.6 OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT: All new development "shall be compatible with, and complementary to. the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code." The starting point and high threshold for all new development in Collier County is outlined in Policy 5.6 of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). All new development "shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code." (See Exhibit "F") In order to be consistent with Policy 5.6 of the FLUE, i.e., "compatible with the surrounding land uses", the FLUE and zoning should only allow land uses, densities and intensities that are the same as or less intensive than the existing land use patterns,densities and intensities on surrounding improved, vested or exempt property. In order to be consistent with the compatibility requirement of Policy 5.6 of the FLUE, i.e., "compatible with the surrounding land uses",the FLUE and zoning should only allow land uses, densities and intensities that are the same as or less intensive than the existing land use patterns, densities and intensities on surrounding improved, vested or exempt property. 4 In order to be consistent with the complementary requirement of Policy 5.6 of the FLUE, i.e., "complementary to the surrounding land uses", the proposed new development must complete, contribute and add to the surrounding properties in a way that enhances or improves the qualities of the surrounding land uses,"Combining in such a way as to enhance or emphasize the qualities of each other or another." In addition, for a PUD rezoning, LDC Section 4.07.02.B6 states that "Development within a PUD District shall be compatible with established or planned uses of surrounding neighborhoods and property." As proposed in the Applications, it is the opinion of the VBRA that among other issues, the Project is inconsistent with Policy 5.6 of the FLUE. By virtue of the proposed intensity of use and density, the Project is neither compatible with nor complementary to, the surrounding land uses as set forth in the Land Development Code. These opinions have also been articulated by other parties that have provided comments to date. 1. THE PROJECT IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH NOR COMPLEMENTARY TO THE SURROUNDING LAND USES. a. The proposed density is incompatible with the surrounding land uses and well- established residential communities. This is established by Attachment D to the County Staff Report. This incompatibility has also been well analyzed and addressed by Planner Greg Stuart, MURP, of Stuart and Associates Planning and Design Services in his documents concerning the Project's compatibility issues beginning at Agenda Packet Pg. 1906. b. The proposed tower heights, their location, and massing are incompatible with the surrounding land uses and well-established residential communities. This incompatibility has also been well analyzed and addressed by Planner Greg Stuart, MURP, of Stuart and Associates Planning and Design Services in his documents concerning the Project's compatibility issues, beginning at Agenda Packet Pg. 1906.7 c. The height of the structures along Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road, i.e., 16 Stories (14 Stories over 2 parking levels);combined with the substantially reduced setbacks along those two roads, will create a dreaded and most undesirable "canyon effect". See the "One Naples MPUD Development Standards" at Agenda Packet Pg. 1555, Exhibit "H. The massive Northernmost 16 Story building, "Tower 1" (with a 30-35 foot high parking structure to be located a mere 15 feet from the property line) is proposed to be located only 25 feet from the Western property line of the Project site along Gulf Shore Drive and the massive Southernmost 16 Story building, "Tower 2" (with a 35 foot 5 See, example, on-line Oxford English Dictionary, US Dictionary, definitions of "complement and "complementary"; https://www.Iexico.com/en/definition/complement and https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/complementary. See attached Exhibit "G". The documents can be found at Agenda Packet Pg. 1906 through 1987. 5 high parking structure located a mere 15 feet from the property line), is proposed to be located only 25 feet from the Southern property line of the Project site along Vanderbilt Beach Road. d. The Applicant's/Applicant's agent(s) repeatedly assert that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. However, the basis for this bald assertion has not been provided in the Applicant submitted materials. The Staff Report as of this date has not stated the basis for the Applicant's assertion nor for the County Staff Report statement that the "Building Envelope" for the"southernmost properties" is approximately "126.179 sq. ft.". This area of "southernmost properties" is depicted on the "Attachment G Building Envelope C-3 Zone "to the County Staff Report, (at Agenda Packet Pg. 1583). NOTE: the graphic for the Staff Report "Attachment G" (at Agenda Packet Pg.1583) fails to exclude the County owned .79 acres of streets/roads upon which no structures can be built: > , �: _; y„ .tea Law in ate-, %kg t ate►_yr • T. ., '' lit oit ' i .' ' ,, My 4 g ,c .. [�t �1 j li fp^ i '.y� t ^x ' ��\. l� � �`.� �q /wry ++�� .� '�' :' ''` ,, , Vander .�, H bIlt$each.ar,= ""s: As of this date. I am not aware of either the Applicant or County staff providing a detailed basis or analysis of the current land use entitlements on only the platted tracts/parcels outside of the Collier County owned .79 acres of existing platted ROW. Please see attached email string. Exhibit "1", and the questions raised therein, which have not been completely addressed or answered. It is inappropriate when analyzing the Applications to calculate the building intensity/density on the Collier County owned .79 acres of existing platted ROW. It is inappropriate to consider the .79 acre of ROW owned by Collier County in an analysis of the intensity or density allowed under the current C-3 Zoning. That .79 acre cannot validly be used as a basis for calculating current allowable intensity/density. as it is not owned/under contract by the applicant. 6 e. As setbacks are measured from the platted property lines, any analysis of the current development potential of the Applicant owned/controlled lots/parcels abutting the existing County owned ROW tracts must take into account the limitations on the maximum building "footprints" resulting from applying the C-3 setbacks to the platted lots. f. The proposed perimeter landscaping is woefully inadequate for a project of such a massive scale, only 15 feet on the South and even less, only 10 feet on the West; failing to mitigate the"canyon effect". See Agenda Packet Pg. 1564-1571, B. TRANSPORTATION ISSUES AND CONCERNS 1. From a review of the submitted Traffic Impact Statements (TIS) and Operational Analysis, we have the following comments and concerns: a. As noted above, the TIS and current trip generation rates were prepared based upon the bald assertion that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. The basis for this assertion was not provided in the TIS. b. Trip generation for the proposed 10,000 square feet (SF) of retail, office and restaurant uses was based on small office (2,500 SF), variety store (6,000 SF) and high turnover restaurant (1,500 SF). These are three (3) of the lowest trip generation uses in the category. c. As for the residential component, hotel rooms may have a slightly higher trip generation rate depending on mix and have a significant higher AM peak hour inbound traffic. The proposed mix should be clearly defined, or an equivalency matrix should be provided. d. The Operational Analysis with project traffic analyzes four(4) scenarios.The following are some initial comments/concerns: i. A table needs to be provided outlining how the intersection volumes used in each scenario were developed. ii. On Vanderbilt Beach Road, the main project entrance is proposed to be located approximately 450 feet east of Gulf Shore Drive. In Scenario 4, this entrance will likely be blocked since the queue is 535 feet. iii. The study identifies Parking Structure Operational Failure and recommended improvements. The draft conditions say they will be installed, but this assumes this enhanced technology works (and is subject to design approval by Collier County). What happens if it is not approved or does not work effectively? C. OTHER ISSUES/CONCERNS 1. The Developer had advised that it was going to reduce the commercial square footage to 5,000 square feet. That has not occurred and the current version of the MPUD document provides for double that, 10,000 square feet. 7 2. On May 31, 1977, the County Commission adopted a Resolution approving P.U.77- 7-C for the subject property. See attached Exhibit "J". Condition #2 of said Resolution required the then applicant (now property owner) to "donate 17.5 feet of right-of-way for Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive upon demand by the appropriate governmental agency if and when need for the purpose of upgrading these two roads.". If that Resolution has not been rescinded it was not mentioned or referenced by either the County staff or the Applicant. If the Resolution and condition are extant, the area encumbered by that Condition #2 can not and should not be considered as being available for any density or intensity calculation and improvements. The foregoing objections and comments are not exhaustive of all of the many issues with this Project, yet by themselves, provide more than a sufficient basis to deny these Applications. VBRA, as noted above, reserves the right to make additional objections,filings and submittals to protect its interests and to ensure the due process rights of VBRA. VBRA, on behalf of its approximately 950 members, respectfully requests that the Collier County Planning Commission recommend rejection and denial of the pending One Naples PUDZ and SSGMPA Applications. Respectfully s_•••' ed, 40Irr N. / ..d.fr i.,y P. '. Jr. Escillikh Enclosure(s) Cc: with enclosure(s) Collier County Planning Commissioners; Jeffrey Klatzkow, Leo Ochs; Heidi Ashton-Cicko; Board of County Commissioners 8 EXHIBIT "A" To VBRA Objections To One Naples Project Applications PL20190000696 (SSGMPA) and PL20190000697 (PUDZ) Anthony Pires From: BermanMarcus <Marcus.Berman@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 11:06 AM To: Anthony Pires Cc: BellowsRay; SaboJames; KlatzkowJeff; AshtonHeidi; SaboJames; CasalanguidaNick;Zech Lombardo; McLeanMatthew Subject: RE: SECOND REQUEST ONE NAPLES ENTRY IN CITYVIEW NEED CORRECTION Anthony, We do not prepare staff reports for vacations. The only items we prepare for Board approval is an executive summary and resolution. As for a hearing date, the vacation will go before the Board twice, the first on November 10th that sets a tentative hearing date of December 8th. Respectfully, Marcus L. Berman, P.S.M. County Land Surveyor Lat 26°09'49" N - Long 81°46'18"W CAT County Development Review Division Exceeding Expectations, Every Day! 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples FL 34104 Marcus.Berman@a CollierCountyFL.gov Phone: 239.252.6885 Nuth -411 v"' �'v Na How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! ** Upcoming out of office ** None Scheduled From:Anthony Pires<APires@wpl-legal.com> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 9:45 AM To: BermanMarcus<Marcus.Berman@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaboJames<James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BellowsRay<Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaboJames<James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>;AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>;Casalanguida Nick <Nick.Casalanguida@colliercountyfl.gov>; Zach Lombardo <zlombardo@wpl-legal.com>; McLeanMatthew <Matthew.McLean@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE:SECOND REQUEST ONE NAPLES ENTRY IN CITYVIEW NEED CORRECTION EXHIBIT "B- 1 " To VBRA Objections To One Naples Project Applications PL20190000696 (SSGMPA) and PL20190000697 (PUDZ) RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION REQUEST AND PUBLIC BENEFIT STATEMENT GENERAL PROPERTY LOCATION MAP: The subject property and right-of-way vacation request are located at the northeast intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive in North Naples.Please reference Figure A for the property location: FIGURE A:PROPERTY AND REQUEST LOCATION MAP BLUEB!LL AVE 111TH STREET IMMOKALEE ROAI w R: -- � _J a W to ❑ 2 9 PROPERTY LOCATION VANOERSJLT BF4Ct{ROAO J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD, STE 102/ESTERO, FL 33928/239 405.9148(p)/239.288 2537 If) WWW JREVANSENGINEERING COM REQUEST: The applicant is requesting to vacate a portion of Center Street North,the entirety of Gulf Shore Court,and the entirety of the Alley shown in Exhibit B below. These Rights-of-Way are owned and maintained by Collier County as per the recorded Vanderbilt Beach Center Plat(Plat Book 3,Page 16). Please reference Figure B the location of these rights-of- way: FIGURE B:LOCATION AND EXTENT OF RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION REQUEST , - ` . .nw • - ifs . .4 SOUTH DRIVE -' 1dw° r ., c ,? �..., n Ir 1 tr.,. . '' '11° \ 4 A __' M.ENTERSTREET N, *m h A %� ' �mf4ir., t ., 6.,i,.. ..„.r Ai-... ..r 44, •e w` The applicant,Vanderbilt Naples Holdings, LLC owns several contiguous lots within the Vanderbilt Beach Center plat as highlighted in green in Figure C below. It is the intent of the applicant to develop these properties as one(1)cohesive and contiguous project. FIGURE C:APPLICANT OWNED PROPERTIES . - NT P PERTY w • mmpp_.. PROPERTY ,. ''OWNED Pft6PERTY SOUTHEIA DRIVE .. T APPLICANT , " m`? ti X ,, , .,, * tiNTRS 0TRE TN •r;:. I • - APPLICANT ,."; -' '' {r. h t 4'�$'ROPERTl( r . '' , >n apPLICA1�l�YtNWP!!)R �! VgNDE ;l • 'C YC Jr' REI. ,EAckRoz, ., - .0,..,:.'' ,-' ' r i ' A .44 . J-R EVANS ENc iNEERfNtl PURPOSE OF REQUEST: There are(2)main purposes of this Right-of-Way vacation request. First,to remove existing Rights-of-Way where they are no longer needed to provide access to the individual platted lots and where public utilities are no longer needed to serve the individual lots.Second,to eliminate access locations to Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road that are no longer needed and to re-create vehicular circulation through dedicated access easements on the property that will better align with adjacent properties. The following sections provide further detail on these two(2)purposes of request. 1. REMOVE RIGHTS-Or-WAY WHERE THEY ARE NO LONGER NEEDED The ownership of these Rights-of-Way was originally conveyed to Collier County via the Vanderbilt Beach Center Plat(Plat Book 3, Page 16) recorded in 1954.As illustrated in Figure D,the plat includes several lots with a typical lot width of 25' and a depth of 100'.Additionally, Figure E, includes the applicant owned properties in green with the requested right-of-way vacation hatched. Since the applicant owned properties are intended to be developed as one(1) property, access and utility service for the individually platted lots will no longer be needed in the portion of Center Street,the entirety of Gulf Shore Court, and the adjacent Alley. This will create an opportunity to develop a cohesive project with a similar design aesthetic,including but not limited to hardscape, landscape,and lighting. FIGURE D:RIGHT-OF-WAY NO LONGER NEEDED FOR ACCESS OR UTILITY SERVICE y W` . f--{ELATBOUNDARYI mo..•.... ✓.er a ay' -- n ff.'.- '. 1t +r - F7 sttrIxi u7i �w � maxskp t,n rinls 4I+ m .iI t i l » i l a® [ n I i i 1 + t:rn -' .:n.t� 3 : ''',\ aA4 'f, • S C04,MERCe STREET _ . P _ i fit . r I I 1 � I 1 � Ih ~ nrrAs l kr_A -SotpG 4 ttI! if�> �1l e in au a y�:'• u, __ _. O .l i'7�1 t1;!II 1-.-. �.,...-i ti't V -- t S..• .-Y .0, a L. ,, �JJ, » t a S v ` t y i1 r t s- C a J 11' 34 4 34 4 � 4.4 t'8 t1 t4 .q. n Y-. ' ! ' f R sr.,„ . s : �K . Era"�"-.i. f.iii._r,.,,ra:w...... tT e (f 4h t __ , 7 : . z, ,' " , vih�,rPe'L T IT..,�, C e Ev ENGiNEEM s FIGURE E:APPLICANT OWNED PROPERTY WITH THE RIGHT—OF—WAY VACATION i .„„..,„„441.11 PLICANT C1,11, D PROPERTY 1 , e • IdANT DINED Qy PROPERTY , T, E � PLICANT OWNED PERTY I p � SOUTHBAY DRIVE , �a I �, APPLICANT WN ' -rtO ' c ! '' m f m�t �'". ENTER O , STREET N. xI ,, Z s, t_` Y APPLICANTGWNEa, ^, s ASP t C, E PROPERTY , 1 ^y LEGEND fa4a.'1'f )t VANDERggT —>_•1 ` w• `I , 4. H RrOAD a EXISTING RIGHT Of ',. :r merit& '+ Id* v. WAY TO BE VACATED 2. RE-CREATE VEHICULAR ACCESS AND PROVIDE COHESIVE AESTHETIC In order to preserve the existing vehicular circulation and the utility corridor the applicant is proposing to provide replacement access and utility easements on the property.These replacement easements will be open to the public for their continued use to navigate around the Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive intersection. Additionally, an access easement is proposed between Center Street and Vanderbilt Beach Road that is centered on the existing parking garage entrance on the south side of Vanderbilt Beach Road. Please reference Figure F and Figure G for the approximate location of the replacement access and utility easements. EXHIBIT F:APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS PLAT BOUNDARY txilUXWIt L41a1gM Pr PROPOSED WtlUC MAASS tABlMkl11 i i t ill 1 I 1 L / J I 1� I.R. EVANS %NI.;;;NEFRINtr, EXHIBIT G:AppRom,1 3 i:= LUCATICT;%OF Pr,,,w,-)sfi.,Q.:-L',,_,,AN')U ILL',Pi EASEMENTS LNITIE AERIAL iikeiv, ...-.. : ..„.,*„...-;-2.-_,t,w,:fi • ...... •• ,.i • , • • . , • •.$ . - -, . ' - :.,.• . . , e 4. IP .. ...,..., .. i',..°' A :,.,*'-''..•!-:,t+ ....11, ,.• ' .,,,,..' , , :r:..w, 6:artsrao„, , , e• • i - I", ..; I. ...4; io r4".'''' -': r'• I '''''. , i. BMW ti. - ----- _. _ lir.1":4%.,... .41'. ' . ' .'-lif.• or"' , '4 ' . k, • .' . ,. , , ..,„ ..'.f. . _ . . . . ,. I. ..,.X .,,. - .,,r,',-„ : ' ., :. :I. '''''';''''''4", ::''' ..'s,'",:':,4. ii-• :- r -.,.. .I EVANS PUBLIC BENEFIT: The vacation of the aforementioned roadways will allow for the removal of the three (3) existing driveway connections to Gulf Shore Drive and three(3)driveway connections to Vanderbilt Beach Road as the property will be developed as one contiguous project.The existing intersection of Gulf Shore Court and Vanderbilt Beach Road will be replaced with the access easement that is aligned with the existing public parking garage entrance. Removing these driveway connections will eliminate the potential for vehicular conflicts near the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive. Figure H, below,outlines the six(6)driveway connections that will be removed and the replacement driveway connection along Vanderbilt Beach Road that will be added to provide access to the proposed project and existing properties within the Vanderbilt Beach Center development. FIGURE H:EXISTING DRIVEWAY CONNECTIONS TO BE REMOVED cutim, ,4 sWYA°47 1 litt ., , ,.. MI l .e sountiracw I IV 4'44: 14:7' -II'''' ali: '•• 1 FCiKvb M�M\i at N 4. , i ' 1 _ e t. }}4; *. Vacating the Rights-of-Way that are no longer needed to provide vehicular access and a utility corridor remove these public roads from Collier County's maintenance program.The replacement access easement will not only provide the public continued access, but it will also allow the applicant to enhance/beautify these areas with landscape and hardscape features that will be privately maintained. Lastly, the applicant, Vanderbilt Naples Holdings, LLC is prepared to pay for all the required capital improvements and on-going maintenance for the entirety of Southbay Drive (including but not limited to sidewalks,utility, landscaping,drainage,and roadway improvements). J.R. EVANS F'.NGINEF.FUNft EXHIBIT "B-2" To VBRA Objections To One Naples Project Applications PL20190000696 (SSGMPA) and PL20190000697 (PUDZ) EXHIBIT "A" PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 20, BLOCK "D", AND A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHBAY DRIVE (60.00 FOOT WIDE COMMERCE STREET PER SAID PLAT) AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GULF SHORE COURT (60.00 FEET WIDE PER SAID PLAT); THENCE S.89'52'30"E. ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 60.67 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK "B", OF SAID PLAT AND A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GULF SHORE COURT (60.00 FEET WIDE PER SAID PLAT); THENCE S.08°23'20"E. ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 172.15 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE WITH THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CENTER STREET (60.00 FEET WIDE PER SAID PLAT); THENCE S84°40'40"E. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 144.42 FEET; THENCE S.00°07'30"W. A DISTANCE OF 30.19 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 66.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°47'53", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 26.09 FEET AT A BEARING OF S36'54'18"E, FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.26 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE 8.48°18'15"E. A DISTANCE OF 17.91 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CENTER STREET; THENCE N.84°40'40"W. ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 164.47 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID GULF SHORE COURT; THENCE S.08'23'20"E. ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 89.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD (100.00 FEET WIDE PER SAID PLAT); THENCE N.80'29'30"W. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 83.05 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID GULFSHORE COURT; THENCE N.08°23'20"W. ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 84.65 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF A 20 FOOT WIDE ALLEY PER SAID PLAT; THENCE N.84°40'40"W. ALONG THE SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 123.52 FEET; THENCE N.08°23'20"W. ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID 20 FOOT WIDE ALLEY A DISTANCE OF 216.95 FEET TO A POINT INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHBAY DRIVE; THENCE 3.89'52'30"E. ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 20.22 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID 20 FOOT WIDE ALLEY; THENCE S.08'23'20"E. ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 182.55 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 76°17'20", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 24.71 FEET AT A BEARING OF S46.32'OO"E, FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.63 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE S.84°40'40"E. ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID 20 FOOT WIDE ALLEY A DISTANCE OF 87.23 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GULF SHORE COURT (60.00 FOOT WIDE PER SAID PLAT); THENCE N.08°23'20"W. ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 207.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, PARCEL CONTAINS 34310.0 SQUARE FEET. 0.79 ACRES MORE OR LESS THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. Digitally signed by KRIS A SLOSSER Oate. 20/0.08.12 115559 PAGE 1 OF 2 KRIS A. SLOSSER, STATE OF FLORIDA, (P.S.M. #5560) SEE ATTACHED SKETCH - -d �z ;,1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION KRIS A SLOSSER P.S.M. A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN 4642 VILLA CAPRI LW. BONITA SPRINGS SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FLORIDA 34134 (239) 947-1915 IJ4 0 Cr III ct) E •_-_- E o , a. co Lu c.)0 o i z.Z. LiJ z 5 vi I- vr 2 z - - ----- - • - a, 0 — , 0 4 CV 0 Z --., _____ I 0 _, -,, ...., -J "a62ET8 i 1 0 (f3 < 22 < n 0 CD o -1 5 0 CV L'- iithhHillik111111111111 R 0•W• -2 1 .* X Ilt.111111111111111, at `-' >'° Z i- 1/1 LLI Cd 0 W lilt CA Z 0 Li 43 g gt I, L g < 1••••1 Z 0 0 < z G0<d 0 n 0 • -• 0_ LL1 04 <<-0 -0.La x ....• 0 Ce (1 ±.CT ic. w c•Ci en 8 t a U U EJ) D -I r•-• CP r:) 11111331; 3 ... 0 li- 1 IIIIIII: U V) 0 V) M E- c14 zQ N CC Ci CI ... .-. < a k E-, o ..- co ,4 Le Ina" ,‹ 0,, z ,., .... ., . .., a_ >0, iiiii....,. ,amomi 0 aa r, OW p z — 0, R u o 0 1-- cr 0 CD 0. F.) 1)1111117N Z VI X 0,,C) C4 43 n r-• a 1 1 ce cuJ 14j .."....._ (4 4.1•-• Cd _7.1 ort C4[..1 Z7,1 s=1 co el C''1" .11111111:1111 I.. f ULuchP —J >.< cd,= E-, z R p as ,r) A 1:::. 711.1111111 -4 CO < 0 ' r.,0 C.) 0 a. • a. ,..N Lu z_ al c4 ci 41 a, 0,.., a, LLI CD . -, ci - 04 < re) 0 e" w" c4 05 W c4 _ w aw . <., — coa o al 0 ''"-,. ce ci ci $ / z ,ii,u ,0 x x g ,•s x ci f,./). a, Ei.i,fx ,,cz g t•-• 1.1...)- x:g,--. El, , 6 !›._ L6 z vw ci 0 Ell R-O•W >. r LU >-.0 x 0 -8.:- L2 > cn 12 V Z ...„ 2 E.0 Po NvQ),, emu skiofacciugl .8 4,. ce Do W+'Z cdo amormil*I.LI 8" 0'-• rL.0 Z D 10B.VANDERBILT PUD (/)Z _. 0 r, . ..,- ,,,1.14 : 0—40 Z 0 .-4 , •-. Ls) WAY P.". .") DRAWN BY: K AS " ..0) 12— Q.,r. , vz.) N )-'-• 0''Maki i < 17... C...)0 •-•0) 2 ... .... ce-1. 4 , Izipses...lialalli 1 E.... DRAWING:ROW VACATION .- eltig (cje . ts, ''"-., ci 0 Oz IN N I ° SCALE:1" ... 150' d‘i ei :2 MICICE IY )2! i eri 36 0 p 0 . ' zuN E-0 - 2(Y AU-Est 1 :-. ,, .1 t s_ __--- 1111 1,:i it: 4 ,,,1111110Ft 0,04, (.. •;.- z x 0. ..a. h ... ... . ' ..1 .., t ..i.,_ZoCs, ,N. - cV,O• cc1. CO. ....IX RO NE k::5 R j) - R.O. 0 GULFSWRE - ---- 0 - 0 - --- w --- _ __, ------ < 1- •o•• Wo•olo• •flt.• • • • ° . tIVZ:4 N.. Lu '5 s.... :.-s•an,RN-A.R.F',41,:::.'> " C9 R. . - - --1--- -- o---w 2 0 • ir2 tu 7'•)'<o 0,2 Ij ,-,I ,,,,•-.0--,--1-.4--.I-4,•-I--.1 .t.Sir SP ,NI•4, 44 EXHIBIT "C" To VBRA Objections To One Naples Project Applications PL20190000696 (SSGMPA) and PL20190000697 (PUDZ) RESOLUTION 12-234 , A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES FOR AMENDING THE COWER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN. WHEREAS, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, requires local governments to prepare and adopt a Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 (Section 163.3161, et seq., Florida Statutes) mandates certain procedures to amend adopted Growth Management Plans(Section 163.3184 and Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes); and WHEREAS, in order to provide adequate notice, it is necessary to set forth the requirements and procedures to be followed by petitioners, the general public and Collier County in processing amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan consistent with the requirements of the Florida Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. Subject to prior Board approval, staff will implement three amendment cycles during which applications for amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan or one of its elements ("GMP") will be processed. Additional GMP amendment cycles can only be implemented by approval of the Board. Such approval shall be by majority vote. 2. All amendments must strictly conform with the Florida Growth Management Act, including, but not limited to, Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, for amendments in general, and Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes, for adoption of a small-scale comprehensive plan amendments. 3. An amendment may be proposed by the Board of County Commissioners, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), any department or agency of the County, or any private person, provided, however, that no such person shall propose an 8 amendment for a land use designation change for property which he or she does not own, except as an agent or attorney for the owner. 4. All required copies of the application to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan and supporting documentation along with the required tiling fee must be submitted to the County Manager or his designee prior to the deadline established by the Board for each adoption cycle. Following the requisite submission: A. Prior to submittal, a pre-application conference shall occur between the petitioner and appropriate County staff to ensure that the amendment procedure is understood and adhered to. B. Staff shall perform an initial review of the proposed amendment application to determine whether additional information is necessary to enable staff to conduct a formal review and whether other amendments of the Growth Management Plan will be necessary to preserve the internal consistency of the Plan. Within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline, the staff shall notify the petitioner in writing, that: (i) staff has determined that the petition is adequate for formal review; or (ii) the application is inadequate for formal review and the notice shall set forth in detail the additional information deemed necessary for formal review of the petition. C. If the application is deemed insufficient, the petitioner shall have 30 calendar days from the date of receipt of staffs letter of insufficiency to supplement the application in response to the initial review. A second 30 day time period to respond to the insufficiency may be requested by the petitioner. D. County staff shall review the application and may consult with other County Departments or agencies as it deems necessary to evaluate the proposed amendment and shall prepare a report with a recommendation. E. The Public Hearings schedule and State Agency review time frames will be those as established by Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, "Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or plan amendment.",or Section 163.3187, Florida Statute, "Process for adoption of small-scale comprehensive plan amendment," as amended from time-to- time.Adoption of an amendment to the Growth Management Plan must be by Ordinance and shall require four affirmative votes of the Board of County Commissioners. 9 5. This Resolution supersedes and repeals Resolution 97-431, as amended by Resolution 98•1 8, relating to prior Growth Management Plan Amendment procedures. TIIIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote favoring same,this 13th day of November,2011 ATTEST: - ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E: BROC`K,CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By:- By: Doput er FRED W. COYL CHAIR A Platt a to Chi tems c ' i i gaiV.aAr a o+t 5_ Ap! ove! . to lane and legal sufficiency: Jeff 41.K .kov, Coun • !orney 11 1 10 EXHIBIT "D" To VBRA Objections To One Naples Project Applications PL20190000696 (SSGMPA) and PL20190000697 (PUDZ) 10.02.08 - Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas A. Purpose and intent. The official zoning atlas may, from time to time, be amended, supplemented, changed or repealed. Procedures shall be as follows: B. Amendment of the zoning atlas. A zoning atlas amendment may be proposed by: 1. Board of county commissioners. 2. Planning commission. 3. Board of zoning appeals. 4. Any other department or agency of the county. 5. Any person other than those listed in 1.-4. above; provided, however, that no person shall propose an amendment for the rezoning of property(except as agent or attorney for an owner)which he does not own.The name of the owner shall appear in each application. C. All proposals for zoning amendments shall be considered first by the Planning Commission in the manner provided in this section. D. All proposals for zoning amendments shall be submitted as established in the Administrative Code and accompanied by all pertinent information required by the LDC and which may be required by the Planning Commission for proper consideration of the matter, along with payment of such fees and charges as have been established by the Board of County Commissioners. No application for zoning amendment shall be heard by the Planning Commission until such fees and charges have been paid. 1. Rezoning application processing time. An application for a rezoning, amendment or change will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. An application for a rezoning, amendment or change will be considered "closed" when the applicant withdraws the subject application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and shall be withdrawn. An application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. The County Manager or designee will notify the applicant of closure, however, failure to notify by the county shall not eliminate the "closed" status of a petition. An application deemed "closed" may be re-opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. E. Planning Commission hearing and report to the Board of County Commissioners. 1. Time limits. Unless a longer time is mutually agreed upon by the Planning Commissioners, the Planning Commission shall file its recommendations with the Board of County Commissioners within 45 days after the public hearing before the Planning Commission has been closed. 2. Presentation of evidence. The staff report on the application for rezoning shall be presented prior to the close of the public hearing on the application. The applicant shall be afforded the opportunity, prior to the close of the public hearing, to respond to any contentions presented by any testimony or other evidence presented during the public hearing, and to respond to the staff report, after receipt of which the hearing shall be concluded, unless the hearing is continued and the matter referred back to staff for further consideration of such matters as the Planning Commission may direct. F. Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02,08 E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 2. Whenever the Board of County Commissioners has denied an application for the rezoning of property, the Planning Commission shall not thereafter: a. Consider any further application for the same rezoning of any part or all of the same property for a period of 12 months from the date of such action; b. Consider an application for any other kind of rezoning of any part or all of the same property for a period of 6 months from the date of such action. 3. Except as otherwise provided within section 10.02.12 D. all zoning approvals for which a final development order has not been granted within 5 years of the date of its approval shall be evaluated to determine if the zoning classification for the property should be changed to a lower, or more suitable classification. During the fifth year after the date of the zoning approval by the Board of County Commissioners and during every fifth year thereafter, the County Manager or designee shall prepare a report on the status of the rezoned property. The purpose of the report will be to evaluate what procedural steps have been taken to develop the property under its current zoning classification. Should the County Manager or designee determine that development has commenced, then the land shall retain its existing zoning classification and shall not be subject to additional review and classification change. Should the County Manager or designee determine that development has not commenced, then upon review and consideration of the report and any supplemental information that may be provided, the Board of County Commissioners shall elect one of the following: a. To extend the current zoning classification on the property for a maximum period of 5 years; at the end of which time,the property shall again be evaluated under the procedures as defined herein. b. Direct the appropriate county staff to begin rezoning procedures for said property. The existing zoning classification of the property shall remain in effect until subsequent action by the board on the property. c. In the case of developments of regional impact, time limit restrictions shall be superseded by the phasing plan and/or time limits contained within the application for development approval and approved as part of a development order in conformance with F.S. § 380.06. N. Applications for rezones to a specific use. The applicant for any rezoning application may, at his or her option, propose a specific use or ranges of uses permitted under the zoning classification for which application has been made. As a condition of approval of such proposal, the development of the property which was the subject of the rezoning application shall be restricted to the approved use or range of uses. Any proposed addition to the approved use or range of uses shall require resubmittal of a rezoning application for the subject property. O. Waiver of time limits. The time limits of 10.02.08 M above may be waived by 3 affirmative votes of the Board of County Commissioners when such action is deemed necessary to prevent injustice or to facilitate the proper development of Collier County. IOrd. No. (18-08. § 3.P; Ord. No. 13-56, § 3.PP; Ord. No. 14-33, § 3.Z) 10.02.13 - Planned Unit Development(PUD) Procedures A. Generally. Applications for amendments to, or rezoning to, PUD shall be in the form of a PUD master plan of development along with a list of permitted and accessory uses and a development standards table. The PUD application shall also include a list of developer commitments and any proposed deviations from the LDC. The PUD master plan shall have been designed by an urban planner who possesses the education and experience to qualify for full membership in the American Institute of Certified Planners; andfor a landscape architect who possesses the education and experience to qualify for full membership in the American Society of Landscape Architects, together with either a practicing civil engineer licensed by the State of Florida, or a practicing architect licensed by the State of Florida. 1. PUD master plan. The Community Character Plan For Collier County, Florida (April 2001) should be referenced as a guide for development and redevelopment in the PUD district. The Administrative Code shall establish the information to graphically illustrate the development strategy. 2. PUD application. The applicant shall submit data supporting and describing the petition for rezoning to PUD that includes a development standards table, developer commitments and a list of deviations from the LDC. Dimensional standards shall be based upon an established zoning district that most closely resembles the development strategy, particularly the type, density and intensity, of each proposed land use. The PUD application shall include the information identified in the Administrative Code unless determined by the Planning and Zoning Director to be unnecessary to describe the development strategy. 3. Deviations from master plan elements. The Zoning and Land Development Review Department Director may exempt a petition from certain required elements for the PUD master plan identified in the Administrative Code when the petition contains conditions which demonstrate the element may be waived and will not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community. All exemptions shall be noted within the PUD submittal and provided to the Board of County Commissioners. 4. Submittal of School Impact Analysis (SfA) application for residential projects. The applicant shall submit a completed SIA application for the School District's review for a determination of school capacity. Refer to LDC section 10.04.09 for SIA requirements. B. Procedures for planned unit development zoning. Petitions for rezoning to PUD in accordance with LDC section 10.02.08 shall be submitted and processed as for a rezoning amendment generally pursuant to LDC section 10.02.08 and in accordance with the following special procedures: 1. Pre-application meeting. Prior to the submission of a formal application for rezoning to PUD, the applicant shall confer with the Planning and Zoning Department Director and other County staff, agencies, and officials involved in the review and processing of such applications and related materials. The applicant is further encouraged to submit a tentative land use sketch plan for review at the pre-application meeting, and to obtain information on any projected plans or programs relative to possible applicable Federal or State requirements or other matters that may affect the proposed PUD. The pre-application meeting should address, but is not limited to, the following: a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements. contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, policies, and the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. EXHIBIT "E" To VBRA Objections To One Naples Project Applications PL20190000696 (SSGMPA) and PL20190000697 (P U DZ) 4.07.01 - Unified Control A. All land included for purpose of rezoning to a PUD zoning district shall be owned or under the control of the applicant, whether that applicant be an individual, partnership or corporation, or a group of individuals, partnerships or corporations. B. The applicant shall present competent substantial evidence of the unified control of the entire area within the proposed PUD district and shall state agreement that if he proceeds with the proposed development, he will: 1. Notify the County Manager or his designee in writing of any change in ownership, control and/or name of the development. 2. Do so in accordance with: a. The PUD master plan of development officially adopted for the district; b. Regulations and development standards as set forth in the PUD document and PUD master plan; c. Such other conditions or modifications as may be attached to the rezoning of land to the PUD classification; and d. The Collier County growth management plan and land development code. 3. Provide written agreements, contracts, deed restrictions, or sureties acceptable to the county for completion of the undertaking in accord with the adopted PUD master plan as well as for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas, functions and facilities that are not to be provided, operated or maintained at general public expense; and 4. Bind his successors in title to any commitments made under section 2.03.06, this section 4.07.00 and section 10.02.13. (Ord. No. 04-72, § 3.R) EXHIBIT "F" To VBRA Objections To One Naples Project Applications PL20190000696 (SSGMPA) and PL20190000697 (PUDZ) Future Land Use Element as of Ordinance No.2019-39 adopted November 12.2019 (XV)(XLIV) Policy 5.4: All applications and petitions for proposed development shall be consistent with this Growth Management Plan, as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. (VIl)(IX)(XXX)(XLIV) Policy 5.5: Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by: confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban on the Future Land Use Map; requiring that any additions to the Urban Designated Areas be contiguous to an existing Urban Area boundary; and, encouraging the use of creative land use planning techniques and innovative approaches to development in the County's Agricultural/Rural designated area, which will better serve to protect environmentally sensitive areas, maintain the economic viability of agriculture and other predominantly rural land uses, and provide for cost efficient delivery of public facilities and services. (XV)(XLIV) Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). (VlI)(lX)(XV)(Xuv) Policy 5.7: Encourage the use of land presently designated for urban intensity uses before designating other areas for urban intensity uses. This shall occur by planning for the expansion of County owned and operated public facilities and services to existing lands designated for urban intensity uses, the Rural Settlement District (formerly known as North Golden Gate), and the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. before servicing new areas. (VII)(IX)(XLIV) Policy 5.8: Permit the use of clustered residential development, Planned Unit Development techniques, mixed-use development, rural villages. new towns, satellite communities,transfer of development rights, agricultural and conservation easements, and other innovative approaches, in order to conserve open space and environmentally sensitive areas. Continue to review and amend the zoning and subdivision regulations as necessary to allow and encourage such innovative land development techniques. (XLIV) Policy 5.9: Encourage recognition of identifiable communities within the urbanized area of western Collier County. Presentation of economic and demographic data shall be based on Planning Communities and commonly recognized neighborhoods. (XV)(XLIV) Policy 5.10: Group Housing, which may include the following: Family Care Facility, Group Care Facility, Care Units, Assisted Living Facility, and Nursing Home, shall be allowed within the Urban designated area, and may be allowed in other future land use designations, subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code(Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004)and consistent with the locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). Family Care Facilities, which are residential facilities occupied by not more than six (6) persons. shall be permitted in residential areas. (XLIV)=Plan Amendment by Ordinance No.2017-22 on June 13, 2017 18 EXHIBIT "G" To VBRA Objections To One Naples Project Applications PL20190000696 (SSGMPA) and PL20190000697 (PUDZ) 4.07.02-Design Requirements In addition to all general provisions and procedures established in this section, the following specific requirements, limitations and standards shall apply to all PUD districts except that section 4.07.02 D. shall not apply when there is no residential component within the PUD and section 4.07.03 shall not apply when there is no industrial component in the PUD. A. Minimum area. 1. The minimum area required for a PUD shall be ten (10) contiguous acres except as otherwise provided for within a specific zoning or overlay district, or when located within an activity center or within the urban coastal fringe areas as designated on the future land use map of the GMP, or when located within a neighborhood center as designated on the golden gate area master plan future land use map or Immokalee area master plan future land use map of the GMP, or when implementing the residential mixed use neighborhood subdistrict or the commercial mixed use subdistrict in the future land use element of the GMP, where no minimum acreage requirements must be met. 2. For infill parcels, the minimum area required for a PUD shall be two (2) contiguous acres. For purposes of the planned unit development district only, the term "infill parcels" shall refer to property implementing any of the infill subdistricts identified in the future land use element or golden gate area master plan element of the GMP, or property sharing at least two common boundaries with parcels that are developed. 3. For a PUD subject to the minimum area requirement of ten (10) contiguous acres, an exception shall be made for properties separated by either an intervening planned or developed public street right-of-way; provided, however, no portion of such separated properties shall be less than five (5) acres. For infill parcels, an exception shall be made for properties separated by either an intervening planned or developed public street right-of-way. For a PUD with no minimum area requirement, as identified in section 4.07.02.A.1., that PUD may include properties separated by either an intervening planned or developed public street right-of-way, B. External relationships. 1. Development within a PUD district shall be compatible with established or planned uses of surrounding neighborhoods and property, 2, The PUD shall provide protection of the development from potentially adverse surrounding influences and protection of the surrounding area from potentially adverse influences generated by or within the PUD. Fences, walls, or vegetative screening at the boundaries of PUD districts shall be provided, at a minimum, in accordance with the landscaping/buffering requirements of section 4.06.00 to protect residents from undesirable views, lighting, noise, or other adverse off- site influences, or to protect residents of adjoining districts from similar possible influences from within the PUD district. 3. In all cases, screening shall, at a minimum, be designed to protect existing or potential first-floor residential occupant window levels. 4. Off-street parking areas for five (5) or more cars, service areas for loading or unloading vehicles other than passengers, and areas for storage and collection of trash and garbage shall be so screened, C. Internal relationships. The development plan for a PUD district shall provide for safe, efficient, convenient, and harmonious grouping of structures, uses and facilities, and for appropriate relation of space inside and outside buildings to intended uses and structural features. D. Residential density. 1. The overall maximum residential density permissible or permitted in a PUD shall be calculated by dividing the total number of dwelling units by the total of gross acreage of the proposed EXHIBIT "H" To VBRA Objections To One Naples Project Applications PL20190000696 (SSGMPA) and PL20190000697 (PUDZ) 9.A.6.b EXHIBIT B ONE NAPLES MPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for residential and commercial land uses within One Naples MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. 0. MU Tract I MU Tract 2 MU Tract 3 MU Tract 4 to a) PRICIPAL USES tz. ea MIN.LOT AREA 20.000 s.t. 25,000 s.f 25.000 s.f. 25,000 s.f. Z MIN.LOT WIDTH' 50' 50' 50' 50' MIN.FLOOR AREA= 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. 1.000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. 0 n PE:RINIF:FER SETBACKS co 15'to Parking Deck, N/A N/A N/A o GULF SHORE DRIN E 25'to Tower' o 0 15'to Parking Deck, 15, N/A N/A VANDERBII:f BEACH RD. 25"to Tower' e- 10'to Patting Deck. N SOUCHBAV DRt,II 25'to Tower' 10' 10' IO' Jal. CENTER SIRLF I 10' 10' N/A N/A N WATERER()\1 N/A N/A 0' 0' n CL BAREFOOT PELICAN CONDO.Pl, N/A N/A N/A 'h ZONED BH ALL INTERNAL.DRIVES/ACCESS oo co EASEMENTS 0 0' 0' 0' to M ALL OTHER YARDS 10' 10' _ 10' 10' MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN N/A ' ' STRUCTURES r� SU. 3U 30 i MAXIMUM BUILDING N HEIGHTMAX.BUILDING HEIGHT 182' 55' 55' 55' p NOT TO EXCEED(ZONED) MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED(ACTUAL)' 208' 77' 87' 87' C ACCESSORY USES c SETBACKS:ADJA( I \1 TO PUBLIC STREET S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. 0 SETBACKS: I.I.A (11 I It R YARDS S.P.S. S.P S. S.P,S. S.P.S. Q MAX.Bill t)l\t. II! HMI NOT TO 40' 30' 30" 30' EXCEED('/.O:\111, cp MAX.BUILDINt, III 1'.11 i NOT TO . 40' 40' 40' EXCEED(ACTUAL' c. 4s .) ra s.f.=square feet S.P.S.=Same as Principal Structures q PL=Property Line 'As measured by frontage on a public right-of-way or internal driveway. y .'For residential dwelling units.hotel suites/rooms and commercial uses are not subject to a minimum Floor area requirement. E 'The term Parking Deck refers to the multi-story parking structure located under the two Tower elements.located on Tract MU as depicted on Exhibit s G.The Parking Deck shall not exceed 35'in Actual Height, ea d Page 3 of 18 H:\20I612016025\WP1MPtID Rezone\lnitial Submittal 20 1 917-3 1-202 0\One Naples MPIID Document tPL-20190000697)7-31-2020.docx Packet Pg. 1555 EXHIBIT "I" To VBRA Objections To One Naples Project Applications PL20190000696 (SSGMPA) and PL20190000697 (PUDZ) Anthony Pires From: Anthony Pires Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 5:28 PM To: AshtonHeidi;JenkinsAnita; BellowsRay; SaboJames; FrenchJames;CasalanguidaNick Subject: 4TH REQUEST: ONE NAPLES PROJECT/APPLICATION Importance: High James, Ray, Anita, could you please answer/advise as to the following, as initially asked 1 week ago. thanks Tony ANTHONY P. PIR'i S. JR.. B.C.S. Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wpl-lecial.com .voRJ0 ORF T ti. UTzLEINTY(i GQVEI MNT LAW Firm Website: www.wpl-leaal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone(call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From:Anthony Pires Sent: Monday,August 17,2020 9:28 AM To:AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>;JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay<Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: FrenchJames<James.French@colliercountyfl.gov>; CasalanguidaNick<Nick.Casalanguida@colliercountyfl.gov>; Klatzkowleff<Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>;Zach Lombardo<zlombardo@wpl-legal.com> Subject: FW: ONE NAPLES PROJECT/APPLICATION Importance: High Good morning all. James, Ray, Anita, could you please answer/advise as to the following, as initially asked 1 week ago: 1. the basis for the applicant's/applicant's agent's assertion(s) that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 2. the acreage (and the location of the acreage) utilized as the basis for the applicant's assertion that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 3. whether the acreage of the existing platted ROW "within the project" was included or excluded from the applicant's assertion/analysis that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 4. whether County staff or the applicant has performed/submitted an analysis of the current land use entitlements on the platted tracts/parcels outside of the existing platted ROW. Thanks ANTHONY P. PIRES, JR., B.C.S. Woodward, Pires& Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires wpl-legal.com f yk0 Cl0.T`` .................... GOA PNVE\?LAAA Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone(call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From:Anthony Pires Sent: Monday, August 10,2020 3:55 PM To: 'Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov'<Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>;AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashtont colliercountvfl.gov> Subject: FW: ONE NAPLES PROJECT/APPLICATION Good afternoon Anita, Ray and Heidi, I understand that James is out of the office this week. In his absence, could we have call to discuss: 1. the basis for the applicant's/applicant's agent's assertion(s) that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 2. the acreage (and the location of the acreage) utilized as the basis for the applicant's assertion that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 3. whether the acreage of the existing platted ROW "within the project" was included or excluded from the applicant's assertion/analysis that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 4. whether County staff or the applicant has performed/submitted an analysis of the current land use entitlements on the platted tracts/parcels outside of the existing platted ROW. ANTI it..j:`J"l I'. l'IRLS, .JR.. R.C.S. Woodward, Pires& Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail 2 Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wpl-legal.com \p RO,/d Opp - 'Ro L(CI'& 60VERNMEVTLAW Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone(call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From:Anthony Pires Sent: Friday, August 07, 2020 5:41 PM To:SaboJames<James.Sabo@colliercountvfl.gov> Subject: ONE NAPLES Good afternoon James. What times would you be available on Monday, August 10, 2020 for me to call to discuss and better understand: 1. the basis for the applicant's/applicant's agent's assertion(s) that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 2. the acreage (and the location of the acreage) utilized as the basis for the applicant's assertion that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 3. whether the acreage of the existing platted ROW "within the project" was included or excluded from the applicant's assertion/analysis that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. Thanks, Tony \N 111()NY P. TIRES. JR., B.C.S. Woodward, Pires& Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wol-lepal.com 4�URf4!J 9�o CE WY,COUNTY& LOCAL GOVERNMENT LAW Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com 3 This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error: any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone(call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. 4 Anthony Pires From: Anthony Pires Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:02 PM To: BellowsRay;AshtonHeidi;JenkinsAnita; SaboJames; Frenchlames;CasalanguidaNick Subject: Re:4TH REQUEST:ONE NAPLES PROJECT/APPLICATION Ray, I find it difficult to believe that the staff does not know, years into this application, what the answers are to my questions. I assume they would've been fundamental questions addressed at the onset of the application. If the applicants assertions as to the entitlement density or intensity are incorrect, then all of their analysis are incorrect; additionally, as the applicant does not own the .74 acres of road right of way, I would believe that that would be a fundamental matter to be raised during the review process, so that the applicants acreage for purposes of calculating usage would be based upon 4.7+or minus acres. I would submit that the applicant Should be asked by county staff, in a RAI, to respond to and address the questions that I have raised, prior to the staff preparing any staff report. This project has the potential to have significant adverse impact to the surrounding established residential neighborhoods, and I believe it is appropriate for staff to ask these hard questions of the applicant prior to preparing a staff report. Tony Get Outlook for iOS From: BellowsRay<Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Tuesday, August 18, 2020 6:13:03 PM To:Anthony Pires<APires@wpl-IegaLcom>;AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>;JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov>;SaboJames<James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov>; Frenchiames <James.French@colliercountyfl.gov>;CasalanguidaNick<Nick.Casalanguida@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: 4TH REQUEST:ONE NAPLES PROJECT/APPLICATION Hi Tony, I apologize for the delay in responding but I have been coordinating with James Sabo since his return from vacation yesterday to see if we are in a position to provide a detailed response to your questions. Based upon my discussion with James, I have confirmed that the analysis of the project is still ongoing as part of finalizing the staff position that is to be included in a staff report. Given the ongoing review, a detailed response to your below listed questions cannot be provided at this time. Please be advised that a full detailed response will be provided when the staff report is completed. Please let me know if you would like copies of the application if you have don't have them already or if you wish to discuss further. Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division -Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Spite Cou.nty Exceeding expectations, every day/ Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://aoo.gl/eXivaT. From:Anthony Pires<APires@wpl-legal.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 18, 2020 5:28 PM To: AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>;JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>;SaboJames<James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov>; FrenchJames <James.French@colliercountyfl.gov>;CasalanguidaNick<Nick.Casalanguida@colliercountyfl-gov> Subject:4TH REQUEST: ONE NAPLES PROJECT/APPLICATION Importance: High EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. James, Ray, Anita, could you please answer/advise as to the following, as initially asked 1 week ago. thanks Tony 2 ANTHONY P. PIRES. JR., R.C.S. Woodward, Fires& Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wol-legal.com 0A J'vlA(EH%' Firm Website: www.wpl-lecial.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From:Anthony Pires Sent: Monday,August 17, 2020 9:28 AM To:Ashton Heidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountvfl.gov>;JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountvfl.gov>;SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountvfl.gov>; BellowsRay<Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.tov> Cc: Frenchiames<James.French@colliercountyfl.gov>;CasalanguidaNick<Nick.Casalanguida@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff<Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>;Zach Lombardo<zlombardo@wpl-legal.com> Subject: FW: ONE NAPLES PROJECT/APPLICATION Importance: High Good morning all. James, Ray, Anita, could you please answer/advise as to the following, as initially asked 1 week ago: 1. the basis for the applicant's/applicant's agent's assertion(s) that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 2. the acreage (and the location of the acreage) utilized as the basis for the applicant's assertion that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 3 3. whether the acreage of the existing platted ROW "within the project" was included or excluded from the applicant's assertion/analysis that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 4. whether County staff or the applicant has performed/submitted an analysis of the current land use entitlements on the platted tracts/parcels outside of the existing platted ROW. Thanks ANTHONY P. f I RES, J R., B.C.S. Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@ wol-lecial.com ,\OKt/1j 0' `ri s,3;iN' Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From:Anthony Pires Sent: Monday,August 10, 2020 3:55 PM To: 'Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov'<Anita.Jenkins@ colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.8eliowsPcolliercountyfl.gov>;AshtonHeidi <Heidi.AshtonCc colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: ONE NAPLES PROJECT/APPLICATION Good afternoon Anita, Ray and Heidi, I understand that James is out of the office this week. In his absence, could we have call 4 to discuss: 1. the basis for the applicant's/applicant's agent's assertion(s) that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 2. the acreage (and the location of the acreage) utilized as the basis for the applicant's assertion that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 3. whether the acreage of the existing platted ROW "within the project" was included or excluded from the applicant's assertion/analysis that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 4. whether County staff or the applicant has performed/submitted an analysis of the current land use entitlements on the platted tracts/parcels outside of the existing platted ROW. ANTHONY P. PIRES. JR.. B.C.S. Woodward, Pires& Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wpl-lectal.com 0411.:/ 41 0z y, �titi '�k,,, t Ri`N Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone(call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From:Anthony Pires Sent: Friday, August 07, 2020 5:41 PM 5 To:SaboJames<James.Sabona colliercountyfl.eov> Subject:ONE NAPLES Good afternoon James. What times would you be available on Monday, August 10, 2020 for me to call to discuss and better understand: 1. the basis for the applicant's/applicant's agent's assertion(s) that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 2. the acreage (and the location of the acreage) utilized as the basis for the applicant's assertion that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. 3. whether the acreage of the existing platted ROW `within the project" was included or excluded from the applicant's assertion/analysis that the current land use entitlements allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses. Thanks, Tony ANitIONY I' C.S. Woodward, Pires& Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wol-ledal.com _.r ..Ns*t* Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone(call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. 6 EXHIBIT "J" To VBRA Objections To One Naples Project Applications PL20190000696 (SSGMPA) and PL20190000697 (PUDZ) • • RESOLUTION -22- May 31, 1977 RELATING TO PETITION! NO. P.U. 77-7-C FOR- 'olM ot:A . USE OF Pitot'FR I HEREINAFTER Di.SCi1LI;F.D bk 37 Itt COLLIER COUItTY, F'LORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Christer 125 and 163, Plortda Statutes, has conferred on all. . counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and en•- force zoning and such business regulations as arc necessary fer the protection of the public; and WitrnLAs, the County pursuant thc+roto tints n}toptod A Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of provisional uses; and WHEREAS, the Coastal Area Planning Commission, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area tie.'eby affected, has held a publiie hearing after notice as in paid regulations made and provided, and has considered the ad- visability of Provisional Use _A5l__.. in a Gar zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a natter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been made concerning all applicable matters requires: by said regula- tions ana in accordance with Section 14--1D of the Zoning Regu- 1ations for the Coastal Arca Planning District; and WIIERI'sAS, all interested parties have been given op- portunity to be hoard by this board in public meeting assembled and the Doard having considered all matters' presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESC1,lrl) by the hoard of County Cortuisuioners of Collier County, Florida, that the petition of -David J. Lawless 194. 4tti Avcnus±_Sguth� tJaples,�F'lorid<t_ _-..__- with respect to the property hereinafter after described as: Lots 7,0,9 & 10, Block D, Vanderbilt Bench Commercial Center I. of May 31, 1977 be and the same hereby iz approved for Provisional Use 1 of the GpC zoning district wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions: 1. A site drainage plan be submitted to and approved by the County 1r Engineer prior to the issuance of any building permits. c 2. The applicant to donate 17.5 feet of right-of-way for Vanderbilt Roach Pond and Cult f;horo hrivo upon dcannnd by tho appropriate 4 governmental agency if and when needed for the purpose of upgrading these two roads. r DE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. Comnissionor lunar offered the foregoing, resolu— r tian and moved its adoption, seconded by Commiss.toner Brown and upon roll call, the vote was: . AYES: Commissioners•Winer, Eroim, Pistor and Archer NAYS: None • ASSENT AND NOT VOTING: Commissioner Wenzel ABSTENTION: None • Done this 31st day of May , is 77 • • BOARD OF COUNTY COMISSIO ERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: • • • • •.'c- ,**t ,��' -23- ___ bk 37 • -24- bk 37 ' May 31, 1177 AOMMI•:IJT I, David J. Lawless , as orluur or author3.'ctl agent for Petition PU-77-7-C agree to the foll.o::Jug stipulations requested by the Coactnl Area Planning Commissiin in their public hearing on Hay 19, 3977: 1. To submit a siio drainngo plan to the County Engineer for approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. 2. To donate 17.5 feat of ROW for Vanderbilt Beach Road and Culfshoro Drive to the appropriate govornmental agency when • needed for the purpose of widening or improving these two roads t /;/ pit. ••f 4d� �._.-_.. ,1'1„C�t11•11kt Olt AGENT 1 h] 1tl.b1 N 1AP vi: FOR C it.Pu r. :'.WORN TO AND num Cit11fl D bl:k'Oltt, f9L•' This �;>-G fty of - Y�O'IAt1X /7. FF.D • mousy woe"'At!r.fer.vn%1.t 41.11E C01Avfltl'1 r}�N'5 1P 13 1 t�'1 t 1 �p}10t0 t1;1tV GINZPI U4sumict ut40i•".YyCiti:e $ )1 CA11�lI£i7ON EXPI1t1::::M_r SaboJames From: Anita Wilcheck <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 10:39 AM To: SaboJames Subject: Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County's citizens as you work your way through Stock Development's application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it's always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock's filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come.And the towers,two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips,for the use"primarily for residents and guests" impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship's store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here's another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That's just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location.Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility,Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know,these recommendations address building height,density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock,giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 1 Anita C Wilcheck 2 SaboJames From: Marsha 0 <naplesmarsha9@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 8:54 AM To: SaboJames; SchmidtCorby Subject: One Naples Petitions---Written Comments for Planning Commission EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr Sabo and Mr Schmidts Thank you for all the work you and your staff have done on this project. Please include these as written comments for the public hearing. As the applicant has revised the project from the original plan, several objectionable attributes have been partially mitigated. However,the applicant continues to request an amendment to the Growth Management Plan and rezoning from C-3 to a MPUD because the density, height, and setback requirements for C-3 can't enable the number of residences the applicant wishes to offer. The applicant has discussed the attractiveness of this plan primarily in terms of the decreased impact on traffic compared with commercial development and the beautiful landscaping those walking by the project will enjoy. The current proposed Growth Management Plan amendment includes language that the MPUD will provide a traffic cap. The corresponding proposed MPUD lists this cap as 148 two-way PM peak hour trips. However, it is concerning that the traffic cap is not part of the visible ordinance and is only included in the supporting materials. This is a concern. Certainly,the commitments by the development to implement useful changes to traffic control in the area are laudable. The Justification and Supplemental Information dated May 29, 2020 does not provide justification for the need to double the residential density from 16 to 31.7 units per acre. The petition is an ask without justification. The doubled density plans then creates the need to be outside the current C-3 limits for building height and setbacks. Again,these asks without justification. Finally,the conversion of the property from C-3 to the MPUD zoning eliminates the public from benefiting from this property as it restricts the commercial space to 10,000 square feet. This means that the public will permanently have fewer commercial amenities available to it than it has now. (Current: Beach Box, Beach Store, real estate offices; Planned: coffee shop, real estate offices). This project as written will benefit the residents of 172 units and Stock Development, but it will eliminate the possibility of developing this property for commercial uses that benefits all county residents and tourists. Please note that the Justification and Supplemental Information dated May 29, 2020 document indicates that the proposed project would generate 70%fewer trips than would 100,000 square feet of commercial use However the methodology used to create these figures is not present in any documents provided to the county. This figure has been repeatedly used to justify why the proposed project is better for the community than commercial development of the same property. 1 In summary,this project could be built within the current C-3 zoning except that the doubled density,taller than standard buildings, and smaller setbacks are requested by the petitioner, likely to meet financial goals which are the goals of the developer, not the goals of the county and the residents and tourists it served. I strongly urge the Collier County Planning Commission to require the petitioner to refine the plan so that the density, building heights, and setbacks are more compatible C-3 standards. Additionally I urge that additional street level commercial amenities be included in an updated plan that county residents and tourists can utilize. Sincerely, Marsha Oenick 705 99th Ave N Naples, FL 34108 2 SaboJames From: Ann Darwish <anndarwish@me.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 5:58 PM To: SaboJames Subject: Opposition to Naples One EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo I think we are headed in the wrong direction. If we give waiver after waiver then we really only have no standards!! I strongly oppose Naples One and continued exceptions for developers. Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County's citizens as you work your way through Stock Development's application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it's always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock's filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come.And the towers,two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips,for the use"primarily for residents and guests" impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship's store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here's another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere,Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That's just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know,these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock,giving the development flexibility vis-a-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. 1 Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! Ann Darwish 2 SaboJames From: Holly Ehrens <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 9:20 AM To: Sabo.James Subject: Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County's citizens as you work your way through Stock Development's application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it's always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock's filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come.And the towers,two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips,for the use "primarily for residents and guests" impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship's store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here's another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That's just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility,Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know,these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock,giving the development flexibility vis-a-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 1 SaboJames From: Ann Darwish <anndarwish@me.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 11:28 AM To: SaboJames Subject: Opposition to One Naples - Planning for smart growth: "Highest and best use" should not equate to maximum profits and high density EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, First I want to thank you for your work on behalf of the citizens of Collier County. I am in opposition to One Naples. I believe Collier County is headed in the wrong direction. If we give waiver after waiver to developers,then we really have no standards! I oppose the One Naples development, even with Stock's latest revisions and wanted to share are my thoughts: I strongly oppose Stock's One Naples and continued exceptions for developers. Setbacks and other zoning regulations have been relaxed lately and I don't like the results.This project is another on the list of"letting it slide" and lack of enforcement of current long time zoning regulations. For first time in 20 years of living here I am thinking I may not stay in Naples when I retire. Naples is trending in a BAD direction. I am not alone in that opinion. Just because current zoning allows it does not make it in keeping with what has been built in the area. In my mind,there is a distinction between a project that is allowed and one that would be appropriate. We can make choices that affect population density and the overall feel of our community. "Highest and best use"should not equate to maximum profits and high density for the rest of us who live in Naples. I support growth that is in keeping with our goal as a community. If growth means we become a Mini-Boca, is that what we want to be? If we resign ourselves to MONEY RULES then eventually the even "the rich" end up on the wrong side of the equation! One thing Naples teaches us: no matter how rich you are,there is always someone who has more than you. Commissioner, what happens when it comes to your neighborhood???As the saying goes"be careful what you wish for." Again, I strongly oppose One Naples and continued exceptions for developers. I will rely on the words of others who can express the details of the issue better than me. Please consider voting against continued waivers to our building and development codes. Be mindful of the precedent you set and the underlying message it sends to the rest of the community. 1 Respectfully, Ann Darwish REALTOR®, GRI, RSPS,SFR®, BPOR,ABR® Naples resident since 2000 PLEASE SEE My Additional Signed Letter and agreement with the opposition letter below. As a Collier County Commissioner, I hope you are listening to the growing level of concern among North Naples residents opposed to the One Naples project, as proposed. What is the value of planning when you can arbitrarily change zoning and request variances that conflict with safety, rights and common sense?The hundreds of walkers from Naples Park, Beachwalk, Pavilion, etc.with chairs on their backs will wonder what happened,when people, not previously zoned, can simply cross the street to take their place at Vanderbilt Beach. One Naples will add more than 500 vehicles that will be forced to use local streets not built for traffic. Vanderbilt Beach Road east of 41 is being widened to six lanes and is being extended further east to the proposed 360,000 vehicle Rural Lands Service Area (RLSA)while west of 41 the two lanes can't be widened. Please note that Emergency Services must pass through Vanderbilt Beach Road from Hammock Oak Drive. Furthermore,the county has built an expensive four-mile bike path, including bridges, north of Bluebill Avenue to Bonita Springs and you must use Vanderbilt Drive to access. Please consider these facts before deciding.Thank you. Ann Darwish Naples, FL 2 SaboJames From: Dennis Deeb <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 3:00 PM To: SaboJames Subject: Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, My permanent residence is on Vanderbilt Beach and find the proposed development to be grossly oversized and will devastate the community! Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County's citizens as you work your way through Stock Development's application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it's always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock's filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come.And the towers,two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips,for the use "primarily for residents and guests" impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship's store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here's another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere,Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That's just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know,these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock,giving the development flexibility vis-a-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. 1 Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 2 SaboJames From: John OBrien <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 10:46 AM To: SaboJames Subject: Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County's citizens as you work your way through Stock Development's application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it's always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock's filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come.And the towers,two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips,for the use"primarily for residents and guests" impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship's store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here's another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere,Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved,Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That's just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location.Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility,Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know,these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock,giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Frankly,this project is overreaching and not inline with what our we want at our beach. It should have been immediately rejected and raises questions that the County has the publics best interest in mind. It is upsetting to all the residents of North Naples that we have to go thru the process of bringing objection to a project that frankly, is gross.This is not 1 Miami...we don't want it to be Miami. If you really want to develop something that is needed in this area it should a modest commercial interest with additional public parking, anything other that is a money grab for a greedy developer. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! John OBrien 2 SaboJames From: Lori OBrien <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 11:22 AM To: SaboJames Subject: Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County's citizens as you work your way through Stock Development's application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it's always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock's filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it,is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come.And the towers,two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips,for the use "primarily for residents and guests" impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship's store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here's another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That's just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility,Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know,these recommendations address building height,density of residential units, setbacks,open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock,giving the development flexibility vis-a-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Frankly,this project is overreaching and not inline with what our we want at our beach. It should have been immediately rejected and raises questions that the County has the publics best interest in mind. It is upsetting to all the residents of North Naples that we have to go thru the process of bringing objection to a project that frankly, is gross.This is not 1 Miami...we don't want it to be Miami. If you really want to develop something that is needed in this area it should a modest commercial interest with additional public parking, anything other that is a money grab for a greedy developer. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! Lori OBrien 2 SaboJames From: Frank Navarro <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 10:37 PM To: SaboJames Subject: Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County's citizens as you work your way through Stock Development's application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it's always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock's filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come.And the towers,two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips,for the use"primarily for residents and guests" impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship's store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here's another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere,Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved,Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That's just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility,Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know,these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock,giving the development flexibility vis-a-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 1 SaboJames From: Guy Kellam <gkellam@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, October 3, 2020 12:46 AM To: SolisAndy;TaylorPenny; FialaDonna; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; HomiakKaren; cvernon@vernonlitigation.com; Karl.Fry@colliergov.net; FryerEdwin; SchmittJoseph; Eastmath@colliergov.net; SaboJames; SchmidtCorby; Craig.Brown@colliertcountyfl.gov; michael-sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov; ShawinskyPeter Cc: R. Kellam Subject: Why One Naples saddens me and we need to do better. EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners and Planners, As far our background, my wife and I have owned 745 99th Ave N since 7/3/2001, having bought the property from my wife's parents, who loved the region and had the foresight to invest in the community as far back as 3/27/1997. Even back in the day, Naples Park was one of the few places in Naples where'regular'folk like us could actually buy a little part of paradise, after a lifetime of hard work. We still proudly refer to Naples Park as 'Pelican Droppings', based on our nearby Pelican Marsh and Pelican Bay neighbors. The insidious plan here, is that Stock cobbled together the property around Vanderbilt beach, with grandiose plans well beyond the current longstanding C-3 zoning, with the expectation that they could bulldoze their legacy on that little corner. Properties there could have been raised/renovated in place, like most of Naples Park. Stock claims to want the best for Naples, but their overreaching plan is certainly not in the best interests of Collier County, including Naples Park and Vanderbilt beach, which we have been a part of for over 20 years. Stock does impeccable work, if you can afford it. Trying to shoe horn this project into a 5.4 acre site is a nightmare for neighbors like us, including increased density (44 units vs 16 per acre), building height (235 ft vs 70), restricted marina access, strained public parking, increased traffic, crippled emergency response, ever more crowded beaches, questionable environmental impact, unacceptable set backs, coastal high hazards, traffic bypassing, all simply at the expense of others. I keep hearing talking points from Stock regarding traffic and building top notch stuff. In the end, it isn't really about what is best for North Naples, but simply an attempt at maximizing profit at the expense of others. For some perspective, here is what is happening already: https.//www.berryhometeam.comicommunities/vanderbilt-beach-one-naples http://www janetberry.net/one-naples/ Some other things to consider: • As it stands, during season the parking garage is already full and even if folks are lucky enough to get a space, they need to squeeze themselves in to the ever restricted Vanderbilt beach public areas (thanks to neighbors like the Ritz). Where are these folks going to park/go?Trying to spread out folks along the beach or providing 'water taxis' or shuttles has been problematic for years, even before this proposed project. • What restrictions are going to be put into place to make sure this isn't going to be another Ritz ala AirBnb,which is already contentious issue in the area? • Pandemics like Covid-19 and the ever increasing hurricane threats make this even more problematic, putting even more people in harms way. • Simply walk down Gulf Shore Drive and take a peek from the start of Vanderbilt Beach road from the parking lot like we do and simply envision looking up. What do you see? 1 All we have are commissioners and planners*like you*who are willing to do the right thing, to protect folks like us who have worked their whole life to experience something as wondrous as this (and to pass on to our children). To this end, I simply ask that you enforce the current zoning or make a*significant*case that changing it would benefit the larger community and not someone else's pocket/legacy. In a nutshell, Collier County simply needs to "Support Responsible Development". Building something like a mini-mercato would still be preferred (even over'heavier traffic') over yet another gated community that further restricts access to this cherished area. Small businesses like the Beach Box Cafe are what still make Naples unique and wonderful. If you haven't been there, might be worth a trip. In the end,just a simple thing to consider, who does this benefit? If you lived in Naples Park or were a regular visitor to Vanderbilt beach, would you support this given that you weren't a resident of One Naples (at a considerable expense)? Thank you for your consideration. Regards, Guy Kellam 2 (11) mwe.com Michael Austin Attorney at Law maustin@mwe.com +1 305 347 6517 October 12, 2020 VIA EMAIL james.sabo@colliercountyfl.gov; michael-sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov; corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov; peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov; paul.shea@colliercountyfl.gov; karl.fry@colliercountyfl.gov; edwinfryer@colliergov.net; jschmitt@comcast.net; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; karenhomiak@colliergov.net; eastmath@collierschools.com; donna.fiala@colliercountyfl.gov; andy.solis@colliercountyfl.gov; burt.saunders@colliercountyfl.gov; penny.taylor@colliercountyfl.gov; bill.mcdaniel@colliercountyfl.gov; Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov; thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov; Chris.Scott@colliercountyfl.gov; ray.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov; Robert.klucik@colliercountyfl.gov; Christopher.vemon@colliercountyfl.gov Re: Opposition to One Naples Rezoning Application Dear Members of the Collier County Planning Commission and Legal and Zoning Staff, and Collier County Commissioners: I represent Mr. Kenneth Melkus, the owner of a Unit in the Trieste, 8787 Bay Colony Drive,Naples, Florida, in connection with his opposition to Stock Development's proposed One Naples Project. I have reviewed, among other materials, (1) Florida law,both statutory and case law, concerning the law of Spot Zoning, (2)the Collier County Staff Report provided to the Collier County Planning Commission ("CCPC") in advance of the October 1, 2020 Hearing concerning Stock's application to rezone property from C-3 Commercial Intermediate Zoning District to Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) identified by Stock as One Naples, and(3)two email letters dated July 18, 2020 and September 2, 2020, authored by my former partner(currently Senior Counsel) at McDermott Will & Emery LLP, William P. Schuman,who is also an owner at the Trieste. Based on the materials I have reviewed, Stock's proposed development constitutes unlawful Spot Zoning. Florida law prohibits Spot Zoning. Spot Zoning is the name given to the piecemeal rezoning of small parcels of land to a greater density, leading to disharmony with the surrounding area. Spot Zoning gives preferential treatment to one parcel at the expense of the zoning scheme as a whole. See Southwest Ranches Homeowners Assoc. v. Broward County,502 So.2d 931,935(Fla.4th DCA 1987). Unlawful Spot Zoning creates a small island of property with restrictions on its use that are different from that of surrounding properties, solely for the benefit of a particular property owner and to the detriment of the community or without a substantial public purpose. Allapattah Community Ass'n Inc. of Florida v. City of Miami, 379 So.2d 387 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); City Commissioner of the City of Miami v. Woodlawn Park Cemetery Co., 553 So.2d 1227, 1240(Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The determination of Spot Zoning involves an examination of(1) the size of the spot; (2) the McDermott 333 SE 2nd Avenue Suite 4500 Miami FL 33131-4336 Tel+1 305 358 3500 Fax+1 305 347 6500 Will Emery US practice conducted through McDermott Will&Emery LLP. Members of the Collier County Planning Commission and Legal and Zoning Staff, and Collier County Commissioners October 12, 2020 Page 2 compatibility with the surrounding area;(3)the benefit to the owner and(4)the detriment to the immediate neighborhood. Parking Facilities, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 88 So.2d 141 (Fla. 1956); Dade County v. Inversiones Rafamar S.A., 360 So.2d 1130 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). The Florida Supreme Court held in 1956: "spot zoning [is] a practice which we and all other courts have universally condemned." Parking Facilities vs. City of Miami Beach, 88 So. 2d 141 (1956). The Florida legislature in 1985 essentially codified the prohibition on Spot Zoning in the Florida Statutes, at Section 163.3194(3)(a) (2019). The statute requires the densities and intensities of a proposed development to be consistent and compatible with the densities and intensities in the comprehensive plan. Similarly,Policy 5.6 of the Future Land Use Element(FLUE)of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) requires that a new development "shall be compatible with, and complementary to the surrounding land uses. . ." The net of this law is that,to avoid the prohibition of Spot Zoning, a proposed development must be consistent, compatible, in conformity, in harmony, and complementary with the densities and intensities of the Comprehensive Plan. Moreover,pursuant to Section 163,the developer must show with evidence that the requested amendment is necessary in order to develop the property. The GMP Amendment Pre-Application Meeting Standard Comments also require this showing. Nor can Stock rely on nearby buildings in neighboring zones such as Bay Colony. A use that is prohibited in one zone cannot be permitted just because the use is permitted in the neighboring zone. Allowing that comparison would make Florida zoning laws and the law of Spot Zoning meaningless. Indeed, building mass and size in a neighborhood would inevitably grow,merely by comparing the proposed project to the next zone over. That is why Florida appellate courts prohibit comparison to other zones. "A comprehensive land use plan legislatively sets a zoning norm for each zone." Machado v. Musgrove, 519 So. 2d 629 (3d Dist.1987). One of the reasons for this requirement is "to avoid spot zoning." Id. As the Court held in Machado, "If the [proposal] deviates or departs in any direction or degree from the parameters of the norm,the [proposal] is not consistent with the norm." Bay Colony is a particularly poor comparison here, as it is a gated community with a totally different environment. Moreover, if this matter ends up in Court on the issue of Spot Zoning, the Commissioners' decision is tested under a standard of strict scrutiny. No deference is given by a court to a County Commission decision where Spot Zoning is in issue. City Commission of the City of Miami, supra, at 1240. See also Board of County Commissioner of Brevard County v. Snyder, 627 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1993); Florida Bar Journal,Vol. 84,No. 1, January, 2010. Among the key, impermissible metrics requested by Stock are the following: 1. Double the permitted density: 16 units vs. 31.7 units per acre. 2. Almost triple the permitted building height: 76 ft. vs. 208 ft. McDermott Will & Emery Members of the Collier County Planning Commission and Legal and Zoning Staff, and Collier County Commissioners October 12, 2020 Page 3 3. Setbacks that are dramatically reduced from what is required: 25 ft. vs. 10 ft. 4. Open Space that is less than half of what is required. Plainly, Stock is asking the Planning Commission, and ultimately the County Commissioners, to allow a development that the Law of Florida prohibits. The Collier County Staff Report agrees that Stock's proposal is unlawful Spot Zoning, because the proposed project is fatally inconsistent with the Growth Management Plan. The Report so states in 20 places: 1. P. 5: GMP Consistency: "Due to the request for increased density from the maximum allowed density of 16 DU/A to 31.7 DU/A, the petition is not consistent with the [adopted] GMP." 2. P. 10: Under Section 163.3164(9), "Compatibility means . . . no use or condition is unduly negatively impacted directly or indirectly by another use or condition." 3. P. 10: "The height of the proposed tower buildings at 208-feet . . . are not directly compatible with the adjacent neighboring buildings. The current allowable maximum height in the C-3 zone district is+76 feet. The Planning Commission may wish to request the applicant to reduce the height . . . to the C-3 zoning Section 4.02.01 LDC standards. . . At a reduced height the buildings may be more compatible in height to the . . . surrounding buildings in the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood." 4. P. 10: "The proposed . . . setback[s] . . . are not directly compatible to the 25-foot setback required in the C-3 zone district." 5. P. 11: "The Planning Commission may wish to request the applicant to increase the setback[s] . . . for all three street frontages." 6. P. 11: "The removal of long standing pedestrian commercial uses" at street level makes Stock's proposal not compatible with existing conditions. 7. P. 11: "The tower 1 and 2 scale and massing are not directly compatible with the adjacent buildings . . ." 8. P. 12: Summary Findings MU Tracts 3 and 4 Buildings: "The height of the proposed buildings at 87 feet is not directly compatible with the neighboring buildings. The proposed height exceeds the C-3 zone district provisions of Section 4.02.01 of the LDC." 9. P. 12: "The proposed 10-foot setback for MU Tract 3 and 4 buildings is not directly compatible with the 25-foot setback [rules] and exceeds the C-3 zone district provisions McDermott Will & Emery Members of the Collier County Planning Commission and Legal and Zoning Staff, and Collier County Commissioners October 12, 2020 Page 4 of Section 4.02.01 of the LDC." "The Planning Commission may wish to request the applicant to increase the setback . . . to 25 feet." 10. P. 12: Summary Findings MU Tract 2: "The height of the proposed buildings for Tract 2 at 77 feet is not directly compatible with the surrounding buildings." PC "may wish . . . to reduce the height. . ." 11. P. 13: "The proposed 10-foot setback along Center Street . . . is not directly compatible with the+25 foot setback"of nearby buildings. Staff suggests increase in the setback. 12. P. 13: Same with the setback on Vanderbilt Beach Road. 13. P. 16: PUD Findings: Proposed development's elimination of long-standing"street level"commercial uses is not compatible with the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. 14. P. 16: "The proposed development standards for MU Tracts 1 through 4 are not directly compatible with the C-3 zone district standards of Section 4.02.01 of the LDC." 15. P. 18: Rezone Finding 5: Stock's"proposed change is not necessary . . . the property could be developed under the C-3 zone district." 16. P. 19: "The light and air to adjacent areas will be affected." 17. P. 19: "The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning. The applicant has not provided any evidence that the property cannot be used in accordance with C-3 zoning." 18. P. 20: "The Zoning Division staff finds that the proposed change exceeds the existing C- 3 zone district and Section 4.02.01 LDC standards for maximum height, setbacks, scale and massing." 19. P. 23: Recommendation: Approval, subject to: "1. Maximum building height for all Tracts is 76 feet zoned, except Tract 1 can be increased to+125 feet zoned height if step back architecture is used for the upper floors . . ." "2. Minimum building setbacks for all Tracts is 25 feet,except . . . Tract 1 can be reduced to 15 feet if street level pedestrian commercial uses are within a building 20. Consistency Review Memo (p. 4): "Due to the request for increased density from the maximum allowed density of 16 DU/A to 31.7 DU/A, the petition is not consistent with the [adopted] GMP. . ." McDermott Will & Emery Members of the Collier County Planning Commission and Legal and Zoning Staff, and Collier County Commissioners October 12, 2020 Page 5 Stock's proposal is entirely incompatible and inconsistent with the comprehensive plan, the current zoning rules, and the surrounding neighborhoods. It is not in conformity with, in harmony with, or complementary to the relevant area. It would result in great harm to, and create no benefit for, the community. The sole benefit would inure to the developer. Stock's proposal is, irrefutably,unlawful Spot Zoning. Stock is asking the members of the Planning Commission to permit Stock to break the law. Under Florida law, Stock's request must be rejected. Regards, /s/Michael G. Austin Michael G. Austin, P.A. McDermott Will & Emery