Loading...
MPO Agenda 10/09/2020COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 October 09, 2020 9:00 AM Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, Esq., Chair Councilman Erik Brechnitz, Vice-Chair Commissioner Penny Taylor Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq. Commissioner Burt L. Saunders Commissioner Donna Fiala Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr. Councilman Mike McCabe Councilman Paul Perry This meeting of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is open to the public and citizen input is encouraged. Any person wishing to speak on any scheduled item may do so upon recognition of the Chairperson. Any person desiring to have an item placed on the agenda shall make a request in writing with a description and summary of the item, to the MPO Director or MPO Chairman 14 days prior to the date of the next scheduled meeting of the MPO. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person requiring special accommodations to participate in this meeting should contact Anne McLaughlin, MPO Executive Director, 72 hours prior to the meeting by calling (239) 252- 8192. The MPO’s planning process is conducted in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Related Statutes. Any person or beneficiary who believes that within the MPO’s planning process they have been discriminated against because of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, disability, or familial status may file a complaint with the Collier MPO Executive Director, Anne McLaughlin at (239) 252 -8192 or by writing to Ms. McLaughlin at 2885 South Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA, PREVIOUS MINUTES AND CONSENT ITEMS 4.A. September 11, 2020 Meeting Minutes 4.B. Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Committee membership 4.C. Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws 4.D. Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Bylaws 4.E. Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (Contract #19-7562, Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.) 4.F. Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA 6. AGENCY UPDATES 6.A. FDOT 6.B. MPO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 7. COMMITTEE CHAIR REPORTS 7.A. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) 7.A.1. Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report 7.B. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC) 7.B.1. Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report 7.C. BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC) 7.C.1. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report 7.D. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (CMC) 7.D.1. Congestion Management Committee Chair Report 7.E. LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD (LCB) 7.E.1. Local Coordinating Board Chair Report 8. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (ROLL CALL REQUIRED) 8.A. Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Cost Feasible Plan (CFP) for planning consistency regarding projects on SR 29 in the FY 2021 – 2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) 9. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (NO ROLL CALL) 9.A. Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program 9.B. Approve Draft List of Cost Feasible Projects for the 2045 LRTP for Concurrence to Move Forward for Public Outreach 9.C. Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) 9.D. Approval of the Supplemental Public Transportation Joint Participation Agreement # 2 (JPA) for Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 5305 (d) funding and the authorizing resolution 9.E. Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution 9.F. Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing resolution 10. PRESENTATIONS (MAY REQUIRE BOARD ACTION) 11. DISTRIBUTION ITEMS 12. MEMBER COMMENTS 13. NEXT MEETING DATE 13.A. Next Meeting Date - November 13, 2020 - 9:00 a.m. Board of County Commissioners Chambers, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 14. ADJOURN 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 4.A Item Summary: September 11, 2020 Meeting Minutes Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 4:32 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 4:32 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 5:06 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 5:21 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 4.A Packet Pg. 4 1 Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 September 11, 2020 9:00 a.m. **AND VIRTUALLY VIA ZOOM 1. CALL TO ORDER Meeting was called to order at approximately 9:00 a.m. 2. ROLL CALL Brandy Otero called roll and confirmed a quorum was present. Members Present Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, City of Everglades City, Chair Councilman Erik Brechnitz, City of Marco Island, Vice-Chair (arrived late) Commissioner Andy Solis, Collier County BCC District 2 Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr. District 5 Commissioner Penny Taylor, Collier County BCC District 4 Commissioner Burt Saunders, Collier County BCC District 3 Commissioner Donna Fiala, Collier County BCC District 1 Councilman Paul Perry, City of Naples Councilman Mike McCabe, City of Naples Members Absent N/A MPO Staff Anne McLaughlin, Executive Director Brandy Otero, Principal Planner Karen Intriago, Administrative Assistant Josephine Medina, Senior Planner FDOT L. K. Nandam, District 1 Secretary Victoria Peters Wayne Gaither Others Present Lorraine Lantz, Chair, Technical Advisory Committee Joseph Bonness, Chair, Bicycle and Pedestrians Advisory Committee 4.A.1 Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: September 11, 20020 Minutes (13773 : September 11, 2020 Meeting Minutes) 2 Trinity Scott, Collier County Transportation Planning Wally Blain, Tindale Oliver Randall Farwell, Tindale Oliver Omar DeLeon, Collier County PTNE Michelle Arnold, Collier County PTNE Tamarin Kirby, Collier County PTNE Bill Gramer, Jacobs Engineering Tara Jones, Jacobs Engineering JoAnn May, FDOT Garrett Beyrent, Public Member Valerie Nowottnick, Minute Taker 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner McDaniel served as Chair [pursuant to Hybrid Remote board meeting protocol] and called the meeting to order. Commissioner Fiala led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA, PREVIOUS MINUTES AND CONSENT ITEMS 4.A. June 12, 2020 Meeting Minutes Commissioner Fiala moved to approve the June 12, 2020 minutes. Commissioner Taylor seconded. Passed unanimously. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA Mr. Beyrent – asked to speak. Was on the board in 1990, reminisced about designing bike lanes. 6. AGENCY UPDATES 6.A. FDOT Ms. Peters – participating in statewide Mobility Week October 30-November 6. Encourages Floridians to try new transportation options. Hosted 39 events across 11 counties last year. Promotes safe transportation choices. Also mentioned census reporting. Directly impacts $675B in community funding. Census is confidential. Secretary L.K. Nandam – M-CORES update. Meeting 8 is upcoming. After meeting 9, will submit final report. Protecting panthers and finalizing study results will be focus in upcoming 2 meetings. Revenue projections did not give good outlook for next 5 years, including current fiscal year. Total $1.5B shortfall in revenue over 5-year period. Will directly impact program development. First challenge is adjusting program in current year. Will need to review next 5- year plan as well. Have been updating the cost feasible plan for the intermodal transportation system. Will restart update next year. Long Range Transportation Plan will incorporate cost feasible plan as developed last year. 4.A.1 Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: September 11, 20020 Minutes (13773 : September 11, 2020 Meeting Minutes) 3 Commissioner Taylor – confirmed that $1.5B short on revenue and projection is for State of Florida. Secretary Nandam – confirmed and explained distinction between “v-shape” and “u- shape” recoveries in terms of revenues, speed of recovery. Commissioner McDaniel – asked for shortfall amount for this year only. Secretary Nandam - $450M shortfall for this year alone. Brief discussion among Board members regarding planning protocols and M-CORES update. Councilman Brechnitz – is revenue generated from gas tax. Secretary Nandam – both state and federal gas tax provides funding. Some money from doc stamps but majority comes from gas tax. Traffic volumes are between 0-10% right now. Some areas are less than others. Councilman Brechnitz – will need to formulate plan on how to reduce dependency on gas tax for revenues with implementation of electric vehicles and other alternative energy sources. 6.B. MPO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Ms. McLaughlin – had site visit portion of certification review on August 11-13, 2020. Held public meeting on August 11 and it was attended by 2-3 members of public. Represented well throughout meeting process by BPAC members. Assisted by Chairwoman, Elaine Middlestaedt, as well as Michelle Arnold, PTNE. Trinity Scott contributed for Transportation Planning. Lee County MPO Director assisted with regional coordination. Review team provided recommendations on how to complete 2045 LRTP. 7. COMMITTEE CHAIR REPORTS 7.A. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) 7.A.1. Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report Ms. McLaughlin – presented on behalf of Neal Gelfand, Chair of the Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC). Ms. McLaughlin read summaries of reports into record of CAC meetings held on June 10, 2020, July 8, 2020, August 7, 2020, and August 31, 2020 via Zoom. 7.B. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC) 7.B.1. Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report Ms. McLaughlin – introduced Lorraine Lantz, Chair of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). Ms. Lantz read report into record of TAC meetings held on June 10, 2020, July 8, 2020, August 7, 2020, and August 31, 2020 via Zoom. 7.C. BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC) 7.C.1. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report 4.A.1 Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: September 11, 20020 Minutes (13773 : September 11, 2020 Meeting Minutes) 4 Mr. Bonness - Read report into record of BPAC meeting held on August 18, 2020 via Zoom. Commissioner McDaniel – mentioned that he attended City Council meeting in Everglades City. Introduced Councilwoman Middlestaedt – discussed program called “lane restructuring.” Community in Everglades City in favor of restriping of SR29. Instead of going through MPO [project prioritization] process, Everglades City is asking the County to agree to do restriping as part of resurfacing; adding pedestrian/bike lanes as part of restriping project. Commissioner Fiala – asked about cost to maintain sidewalk – for example US 41. Commissioner McDaniel – needs extension – not widening. Ms. Scott – US 41 from Greenway to 6L Farms. Section is programmed in LRTP to be widened from 2-4 lanes and would include pathway and sidewalk. MPO believed that SunTrail funds were available. Must have maintaining agency to access funds. Read from application what elements are specifically maintained. Discussed in detail the program requirements and expectations for possible program fund access. Secretary Nandam – SunTrail is statewide program that connects multiple facilities. Maintenance agreement is required. Several MPO agencies are applying for funds to accommodate bike/ped projects. Cannot overlook specific language in SunTrail requirements. There are other options to construct shared use paths provided there is a transportation component without incurring the maintenance requirement under SunTrail program. Explained distinction in programs and maintenance requirements. Recommend application to SUNTrail program when proposal is for a trail [in a greenway, on ROW separate from a roadway.] 7.D. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (CMC) 7.D.1. Congestion Management Committee Chair Report Ms. McLaughlin – read report into record of CMC meeting held on July 15, 2020 via Zoom on behalf of the Chair. Commissioner Fiala – questioned about actual voter membership. Ms. McLaughlin – committee has very lengthy list of non-voting members. Generally, do not attend or participate in meetings. Voting membership had vacancies that could not be filled. Suggested that Everglades City take over non-voting membership so that they could have member representation. Bylaw changes will come before MPO Board for approval in October. 7.E. LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD (LCB) 7.E.1. Local Coordinating Board Chair Report None. 8. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (ROLL CALL REQUIRED) N/A. 9. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (NO ROLL CALL) 4.A.1 Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: September 11, 20020 Minutes (13773 : September 11, 2020 Meeting Minutes) 5 9.A. Approve the Transportation System Performance Report and Action Plan Ms. McLaughlin – introduced Brandy Otero. Requesting approval of Transportation System Performance Report (“TSPR”). Have been working on plan for approximately 18 months. First recurring bi-annual report. Baseline conditions report and action plan. Read portion of Tindale Oliver report into record. Includes data-driven process and integrated report. Introduced Wally Blaine with Tindale Oliver. Mr. Blaine – reviewed presentation contained in agenda packet. Integrating Congestion Management Process and improvements to Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Transit Development Plan (TDP), Bike/Ped Master Plan (BPMP) plan and transportation/land use. Discussed existing transportation routes, programs, and proposed improvements. Explained usage of various performance measures and application to objectives. Commissioner McDaniel – questioned tiers of how congestion is measured. Mr. Blaine – demand versus actual traffic on roadway. Reviewed speed and other traffic measuring data. Tiers based on number of overlapping criteria. Commissioner McDaniel – mentioned concerns with infrastructure and grading of tiers for projects, citing Randall Blvd as an example that should be ranked higher due to safety concerns. Garrett Beyrent – asked to speak, comments concerned a bike path on CR951 and Magnolia Pond and a PUD – matters unrelated to topic under discussion. Commissioner McDaniel called for motion to move study forward. Commissioner Saunders moved to approve. Commissioner Fiala seconded. Passed unanimously. 9.B. Adopt Collier County’s Transit Safety Performance Targets by Resolution Ms. McLaughlin – have until November to approve targets but no reason to wait. Board of County Commissioners (BCC) did adopt safety plan on May 12, 2020 (in agenda packet). Have option of adopting separate targets for MPO. Recommendation is that MPO Board adopt BCC targets by resolution. Has been endorsed by TAC and CAC. Commissioner Taylor moved to adopt Collier County’s Transit Safety Performance Targets by Resolution. Commissioner Saunders seconded. Passed unanimously. 9.C. Approve Revisions to the Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) Ms. McLaughlin – recommended by FHWA. Recommendation to update plan to address pandemic, hurricane and other disaster events to be totally inclusive. Updated file storage protocols, meeting requirements, local guidance protocols, etc. Commissioner Taylor moved to approve revisions to the Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP). Commissioner Fiala seconded. Passed unanimously. 9.D. Endorsement of the Transit Development Plan (TDP) Major Update 4.A.1 Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: September 11, 20020 Minutes (13773 : September 11, 2020 Meeting Minutes) 6 Ms. McLaughlin – requested endorsement of TDP. Introduced Josephine Medina for further information. Ms. Medina – update is ensuring consistency with LRTP. Will go before Board of County Commissioners for adoption but will also feed into 2045 LRTP. Endorsed by TAC and CAC. Introduced Randall Farwell with Tindale Oliver to give presentation. Also mentioned Michelle Arnold and PTNE team for additional support. Mr. Farwell – reviewed presentation in agenda packet regarding TDP. Will include van pool services in Everglades City. Explained Mobility on Demand (MOD) services including point-to-point service within defined MOD service zone. Will connect to CAT at mobility hubs and will serve general public and TD/ADA trips. Expected to see approximately 812k riders or, with changes, 1.2M riders. Discussed route network modifications with explicit detail. Reviewed cost projections and TDP review/decision processes. TDP has been reviewed by TAC, CAC, City of Marco Island, and City of Naples with endorsements received. MPO endorsement is requested today. The TDP will then be forwarded to Board of County Commissioners on October 13, 2020 for final approval. Ms. Arnold – very excited about plan, which is a Vision Plan, not a budgetary document. Will provide guidance to identify projects. Wanted to ensure mobility options for various communities. Working with Everglades City to come up with schedules for van pool routes. Commissioner Fiala – asked about successful, established plans in other areas. Ms. Arnold – Lee County has plan in place that is successfully providing transportation options. Partnership with business community. Brief discussion by MPO members regarding suggested plan. Commissioner Saunders moved to endorse the Transit Development Plan Major Update. Commissioner Fiala seconded. Passed unanimously. 10. PRESENTATIONS (MAY REQUIRE BOARD ACTION) 10.A. Update on 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Ms. McLaughlin – reviewed presentation in agenda packet for LRTP. Conducted virtual public meeting on July 29, 2020 to discuss Needs Plan. Well attended and had very good discussion among panel of experts. Explained specific portions of LRTP including Roadway Network Alternative 5. Evaluation Matrixes – designates adopted goals including protection of environmental resources, connectivity, safety, multi-modal solutions, and integrated transportation. Draft chapters for review include goals and objectives along with needs assessment and financial resources. Related plans are critical – TDP (September Board meeting); TSPR (September Board meeting); Local Roads Safety Plan (LRSP) (October Board meeting); BPMP (adopted March 2019). Final cost feasible network submittal to FDOT by September 15, 2020. Will hold a virtual public meeting on cost feasible plan, date TBD. Expanding advisory committee reviews to include LCB, BPAC, CMC, in addition to TAC and CAC. Needs assessment and cost feasible plan to MPO Board for approval on October 9. Complete LRTP draft to committees by end of October for review prior to Board review in November, and again to committees at end of November prior to final adoption on December 11, 2020 by MPO Board. FHWA/FTA Certification Review indicated greater emphasis needed on multimodal transportation in 2040 LRTP. Need to add financial details related to current TIP in cost feasible plan. Need to amend LRTP to synchronize with new SIS cost feasible plans. 4.A.1 Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: September 11, 20020 Minutes (13773 : September 11, 2020 Meeting Minutes) 7 10.B. FDOT Update on Current Project Development & Environmental (PD&E) Studies Ms. Peters – will give update to Board at next meeting. Updates will be provided in October. 11. DISTRIBUTION ITEMS 11.A. Administrative Modifications to FY2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Ms. McLaughlin – modifications to FY2021-2025 TIP. Do not require amendment and are administrative - informational only. Improved maps on Lake Trafford bike/ped projects. Amendment is presented for insertion in plan documents. 12. MEMBER COMMENTS Ms. Scott – follow-up on Mr. Beyrent’s earlier comment. Golden Gate Planned Unit Development. Is now managed by Transportation Review Section. Pathway along Golden Gate canal. PUD pathway requirements are being implemented. 13. NEXT MEETING DATE 13.A. Next Meeting Date - October 9, 2020 - 9:00 a.m. Board of County Commissioners Chambers, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 14. ADJOURN There being no further business, Commissioner McDaniel adjourned the meeting at approximately 11:15 a.m. 4.A.1 Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: September 11, 20020 Minutes (13773 : September 11, 2020 Meeting Minutes) 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Committee membership OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve an amendment to the MPO bylaws regarding the Congestion Management Committee (CMC) membership. CONSIDERATIONS: MPO staff prepared an amendment to the CMC bylaws to bring them into conformity with the MPO Bylaws and in the process, added a recommendation that the MPO Board remove all non-voting memberships and change the Lee MPO membership from non-voting to voting. The proposed amendment is shown on page 5, Section 1.03 (Committees), D., The Congestion Management Committee. The revisions to the bylaws are shown in Track Changes in Attachment 1 and as a clean copy in Attachment 2. The County Attorney’s Office has reviewed the amendment. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The CMC voted unanimously to approve the amendment to the CMC bylaws regarding membership at its meeting on July 15, 2020. Revisions to the MPO bylaws do not require endorsement by the advisory committee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the amendment to the MPO bylaws. Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Principal Planner ATTACHMENT(S) 1. MPO Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (PDF) 2. MPO Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (PDF) 4.B Packet Pg. 12 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 4.B Doc ID: 13756 Item Summary: Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Committee membership Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 12:10 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 12:10 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 1:08 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 1:22 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 4.B Packet Pg. 13 THE BYLAWS OF COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) Description of OrganizationSection I r.0l t.o2 1.03 1.04 1.05 r.06 Section 2 The Agency Composition and Operation of MPO Committees General Information on the MPO Public Access to Agency Meetings and Workshops Rights of Review Agenda and Scheduling-Meeting and Workshops 2.0t 2.O2 2.03 Notice of Meetings and Workshops Agenda Emergency Meetings and Workshops Section 3 Amendments to Bylaws Section I I.OI THE AGEN The Collier Meropolitan Planning Organization, hereinafter referred to as the MPO, is created pursuant to Florida Statute 339.175 and operates under an Interlocal Agreement, as amended and restated dated February 26, 2015, authorized rurder Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes. The parties to the interlocal agreement are Collier County, the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island, the City of Everglades City and the Florida Department of Transportation. Creation of the MPO is for the purpose of implementing Title 23, United States Code, Section 134, and Title 49, United States Code, Sections 1602, 1603, and 1604, and Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 450, and Chapter 339.175, Florida Statutes. The MPO is created to work in cooperation with the Florida Departrnent of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Adminishation. COMPOSITION AND OP ERATION OF THE MPOt.o2 The composition and operation of the MPO shall be as provided in the aforesaid DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION I @ 4.B.1 Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Interlocal Agreemen! the officers of the MPO and their duties, and these rules may be amended as provided by said Agreement. A. Officers - The MPO shall elect a Chairman and a Vice Chairman of the MPO at its first meeting of the calendar year. The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve for a period of one (1) year or until a successor is elected. The Chairman and Vice-Chairman shall be voting members of the MPO. B. Chairman - The Chairman of the MPO shall call and preside at all meetings of the MPO. The Vice Chairman shall serve as Chairman in the absence of the Chairman. C. Aeency Clerk - The staff of the MPO shall maintain the mirutes and other records of the MPO. The minutes shall accurately reflect the proceedings of the MPO. D. Ouorum - A majority of the voting members of the MPO must be present for the MPO to conduct business. E. Rules of Order - Except as otherwise provided in these Bylaws, Roberts Rules of Order, as revised, shall be followed as to any parliamentary procedures at all meetings. F. Reconsiderati on of Matters -Except for MPO approved contracts, any matter which has been voted upon by the MPO may be reconsidered as follows: (1) By a motion to reconsider made by a member who voted with the majority if such motion is made prior to the adjournment of the meeting at which the matter was voted upon. If there were no public speakers on the item, or if all of the public speakers for the item are still present in the boardroom following a successful motion to reconsider, the MPO may elect to rehear the matter during that meeting, or direct the MPO Executive Director to place the item on the agenda for a future meeting. In the event that there were public speakers for the item, and not all ofthe public speakers are still present in the boardroom following a successful motion to reconsider, the MPO Executive Director shall be directed to place the item on the agenda for a future meeting. (2) By a motion to reconsider made by a member who voted with the majority if such motion is made at a regular meeting following the meeting at which the matter was voted upon, but only in accordance with the following: 2 @ 4.B.1 Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management (i) Where a member who voted with the majority wishes the Board to reconsider a matter after the adjoumment of the meeting at which it was voted oq the member shall deliver to the MPO Executive Director a written memorandum stating that the member intends to introduce a motion to rtconsider. The memorandum shall state the date of the regular meeting at which the member intends to introduce such motiorl and shall be delivered to the MPO Executive Director at least six days prior to such meeting. The purpose of this requirement is to allow staff to advise the Board of the legal or other ramifications of reconsideration. (ii) No motion to reconsider shall be made any later than the second regular MPO meeting following the MPO Board's vote on the matter sought to be reconsidered; with the exception of where the basis for such request for reconsideration is found upon MPO's stalls presentation of newly discovered and previously unknown facts which would have been material to the MPO's consideration at the time the item was originally considered but were not known earlier despite the due diligence of MPO staff. (iii) Upon adoption of a motion to reconsider, the MPO Executive Director shall place the item on an agenda not later than the second regular MPO meeting following the meeting at which the motion for reconsideration was adopted. (iv) Atl parties who participated by speaking, submitting registration forms or written materials at the original meeting the item was addressed by the MPO, shall be notified by the MPO Executive Director of the date of reconsideration. (v) MPO approved contracts may only be reconsidered by motion made prior to the adjoumment of the meeting at which the matter was voted upon notwithstanding the discovery of subsequent newly discovered facts. For purposes of this subsection, a contract is defined as an agreement that is legally binding and enforceable in a court of law. I.O3 COMMITTEES There are hereby created five (5) standing committees, which shall be advisory committees to the governing board of the MPO. These advisory committees are the Technical Advisory Committee, Citizens Advisory Committee, the Bicycle 3 @ 4.B.1 Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, the Congestion Management Committee and the Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged which shall have the following composition and duties: A. The Technical Advisory Committee - the responsibility of the Technical Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the TAC, shall be to serve the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters regarding all modes of travel, including promoting coordination among agencies, members, and transportation planning and programming; reviewing technical suffrciency, accuracy and completeness of appropriate studies; making priority recommendations for the transportation plan and program implementation, and providing technical analyses on other transportation planning issues. The TAC shall be composed of thirteen (13) voting members and one (1) non-voting member appointed by the division, department or agency that they represent. TAC voting members may designate an altemate to replace them in their absence. B. Citizens Advisorv Committee - the responsibility of the Citizen Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the CAC, is to advise the MPO reviewing, reacting to, and providing comment on tansportation planning issues and needs regarding all modes of travel from the citizens' perspectives. The CAC shall consist of voting members appointed by the MPO. Membership shall be composed of thirteen ( l3) citizens residing or whose principal place ofbusiness is located in the following areas: City of Naples (2), Collier County Unincorporated Area (5), coinciding with the established Collier County Commission Districts, City of Marco Island (l), City of Everglades City (l), including the area encompassing Chokoloskee and Plantation Island, and; Four (4) citizens at large, including a minimum of one (l) citizen representing the disabled or an advocate for the disabled community, one (1) minority citizen, and two (2) appointed from Collier County to ensure adequate representation fiom all geographic areas of the county, and to include groups having civic, community and economic interests. Bicvcle and Pedestrian Advisorv Committee - The responsibility of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the BPAC, is to provide citizen input into the deliberation of bicycle- and 4 C. @ 4.B.1 Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management pedestrian-related issues within the community, to advise the MPO on developing a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) that is responsive to the needs of the community, to recommend policies and advise the MPO Board of opportunities that will improve the walking and bicycling environment, recommend priorities for bicycle and pedestrian projects and program implementation, and contribute to the BPMP's vision and recommendations regarding the development of the bicycle and pedestrian network. Membership shall be composed of twelve (12) at-large voting members representing a wide cross-section of Collier County residents and neighborhoods, bicycle and pedestrian safety professionals, Safe Routes to Schools organizations, transit riders, local bicycle and pedestrian advocacy groups, organizations that encorrage active transportation from a community health perspective, and advocates for persons with disabilities, and other transportation disadvantaged populations. D. The Consesti on Manasement Committee - the responsibility of the Congestion Management Committee, hereinafter referred to as the CMC, shall be to serve the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters relating to the update of the MPO's Congestion Management Process (CMP) and the coordination of the CMP with regional Congestion Management System and Intelligent Transportation System architecture. The CMC shall be composed of eleven (ll) voting members aad @pointed by the division, department or agency that they represent. CMC voting af,d-nen- ve+ing members may designate an altemate to replace them in their absence. E.The Local Coordinati ns Board for the Transoortation D isadvantased - the responsibility of the Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged, hereinafter referred to as the LCB, shall be to assist the MPO in identiffing local service needs and providing information, advice and direction to the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) on the coordination of services to be provided to the transportation disadvantaged pursuant to Chapter 427.0157, Florida Statutes. In accordance with Rule 41-2.012, Florida Administration Code, all members of the LCB shall be appointed by the designated oflicial planning agency. The designated offrcial planning agency for Collier County is the MPO. The LCB shall be composed of sixteen ( I 6) voting members appointed by the division, departrnent, or agency that they represent. LCB voting members may designate an altemate to replace them in their absence. 5 @ 4.B.1 Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management All public records of t}le MPO, TAC, CAC, BPAC, LCB and CMC Committee are open for inspection and examination at the office of the MPO, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 a-m. and 5:00 p.m. during regular business days. 1.05 PUBLIC ACCESS TO MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS All MPO, TAC, CAC, BPAC, LCB and CMC meetings, workshops and proceedings shall be open to the public. 1.06 RIGHTS OF REVIEW All parties to the Interlocal Agreement, as well as the FHWA and FTA shall have the rights of technical review and comment of MPO projects. Section 2 AGENDA. SCHEDULING ANd MEETIN GS 2.OI NOTICE OF MEETIN AND WORKSHOPS A. Except in the case of emergency meetings or workshops, the MPO shall give at least seven (7) days public notice of any meeting or workshop through the issuance of a press release to local print and broadcast media in the Naples Area B. The press release notice of such meeting or workshop shall provide: 1. The date, time, and place ofthe event. 2. A brief description of the purpose of the event. 3. The address where interested parties may write to obtain a copy of the agenda. A copy of the Agenda may be obtained by writing to the Collier MPO, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Agendas may also be obtained by e-mail at collierrnpglicq!.lqgo11g1 or by accessing the MPO's Web site at colliermpo.net. 2.02 AGENDA A. At least seven (7) days prior to a meeting or workshop, the MPO staff shall prepare and make available an agenda for distribution on request by any interested person. The agenda shall list the items in the order they are 6 r.O4 GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE MPO @ 4.B.1 Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management to be considered; provided, however, that for good cause stated in the record by the person who is designated to prcside at the meeting, items may be considered out of their listed order. B. The agenda shall be specific as to the items to be considered. All matters shall be listed on the agenda. l. Any person who desires to have an item placed on the agenda of the meeting of the MPO shall request in writing that the item be considered at the next scheduled meeting of the MPO, provided, however, that such a request must be received fourteen (14) days in advance of the scheduled meeting. Written requests for placing an item on the agenda must describe and summarize the item and shall be mailed or delivered to MPO, at the address in Section 2.01 (B) of these Bylaws. 2. Additional items not included on the meeting agenda may be considered at a meeting if the chairman or his designee feels that the item requires immediate action by the MPO. 2.03 EMERGENCY MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS A. The MPO may hold an emergency meeting or workshop notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 2.01 and 2.02 of these Bylaws, for the purpose of acting upon matters affecting the public healtfu safety and welfare. B. Whenever an emergency meeting or workshop is scheduled to be held, the MPO shall notiff, as soon as possible prior to the meeting, at least one major newspaper of major circulation in the Naples Area stating time, date, place and purpose of the meeting or workshop. Section 3 These Bylaws may be amended by a majority vote of tle voting memhrs, provided a copy of the proposed amendment shall have been sent to all members at least seven (7) calendar days prior to it being voted on. The MPO Board has sole authority to adopt and amend the bylaws of any advisory committee. These Bylaws and any and all amendments to the Bylaws will become effective upon endorsement of the Collier MPO. These Bylaws for the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization were hereby adopted in an open session with a quorum present and voting on May*,4020 October 9. 2020. 7 AMF],NDMENTS TO BYLAWS 4.B.1 Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management By METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Elaine Middelstaedt, MPO Chair Attested By: Anne Mclaughlin, MPO Executive Director Approved as to form and legality: COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY Scott R. Teach Deputy County Attorney 8 @)g9 4.B.1 Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management THE BYLAWSOF COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) Section I l.0l 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 Section 2 2.Ot 2.02 2.03 Description of Organization Agenda and Scheduling-Meeting and Workshops Notice of Meetings and Workshops Agenda Emergency Meetings and Workshops Section 3 Amendments to Bylaws The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization, hereinafter referred to as the MPO, is created pursuant to Florida Statute 339.175 and operates rurder an Interlocal Agreement, as amended and restated dated February 26, 2015, authorized under Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes. The parties to the interlocal agrcement are Collier County, the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island, the City of Everglades City and the Florida Department of Transportation. I.O2 COMPOSITION AND OPERATION OF THE MPO The composition and operation of the MPO shall be as provided in the aforesaid The Agency Composition and Operation of MPO Committees General lnformation on the MPO Public Access to Agency Meetings and Workshops fughts of Review Section I DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION I.OI THE AGf,NCY Creation of the MPO is for the purpose of implementing Title 23, United States Code, Section 134, and Title 49, United States Code, Sections 1602, 1603, and 1604, and Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 450, and Chapter 339.175, Florida Statutes. The MPO is created to work in cooperation with the Florida Departrnent of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration. I @ 4.B.2 Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management Interlocal Agreement; the officers of the MPO and their duties, and these rules may be amended as provided by said Agreement. A. Officers - The MPO shall elect a Chairman and a Vice Chairman of the MPO at its first meeting of the calendar year. The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve for a period of one (l) year or until a successor is elected. The Chairman and Vice-Chairman shall be voting members of the MPO. B. Chairman - The Chairman of the MPO shall call and preside at all meetings of the MPO. The Vice Chairman shall serve as Chairman in the absence of the Chairman. C. Aeency Clerk - The staff of the MPO shall maintain the minutes and other records of the MPO. The minutes shall accurately reflect the proceedings of the MPO. D. Ouorum - A majority of the voting members of the MPO must be present for the MPO to conduct business. E. Rules oforder - Except as otherwise provided in these Bylaws, Roberts Rules of Order, as revised, shall be followed as to any parliamentary procedures at all meetings. F. Reconsideralion of Matters - Except for MPO approved contracts, any matter which has been voted upon by the MPO may be reconsidered as follows: (1) By a motion to reconsider made by a member who voted with the majority if such motion is made prior to the adjournment of the meeting at which the matter was voted upon. If there were no public speakers on the item, or if all of the public speakers for the item are still present in the boardroom following a success{irl motion to reconsider, the MPO may elect to rehear the matter during that meeting, or direct the MPO Executive Director to place the item on the agenda for a future meeting. In the event that there were public speakers for the item, and not all of the public speakers are still present in the boar&oom following a successfirl motion to reconsider, the MPO Executive Director shall be directed to place the item on the agenda for a future meeting. (2) By a motion to reconsider made by a member who voted with the majority if such motion is made at a regular meeting following the meeting at which the matter was voted upon, but only in accordance with the following: 2 4.B.2 Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management (i) Where a mernber who voted with the majority wishes the Board to reconsider a matter after the adioumment of the meeting at which it was voted on, the member shall deliver to the MPO Executive Director a written memorandum stating that the member intends to introduce a motion to reconsider. The memorandum shall state the date of the regular meeting at which the member intends to introduce such motion, and shall be delivered to the MPO Executive Director at least six days prior to such meeting. The purpose of this requirement is to allow staff to advise the Board of the legal or other ramifi cations of reconsideration. (ii) No motion to reconsider shall be made any later than the second regular MPO meeting following the MPO Board's vote on the matter sought to be reconsidered; with the exception of where the basis for such request for reconsideration is found upon MPO's staff s presentation of newly discovered and previously unknown facts which would have been material to the MPO's consideration at the time the item was originally considered but were not known earlier despite the due diligence of MPO staff (iii) Upon adoption of a motion to reconsider, the MPO Executive Director shall place the item on an agenda not later than the second regular MPO meeting following the meeting at which the motion for reconsideration was adopted. (iv) All parties who participated by speaking, submitting registration forms or written materials at the original meeting the item was addressed by the MPO, shall be notified by the MPO Executive Director of the date of reconsideration. (v) MPO approved contracts may only be reconsidered by motion made prior to the adjoumment of the meeting at which the matter was voted upon notwithstanding the discovery of subsequent newly discovered facts. For purposes of this subsection, a contract is defined as an agreement that is legally binding and enforceable in a court of law. 1.03 COMMITTEES There are hereby created five (5) standing committees, which shall be advisory committees to the governing board of the MPO. These advisory committees are the Technical Advisory Committee, Citizens Advisory Committee, the Bicycle 3 @ 4.B.2 Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, the Congestion Management Committee and the Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged which shall have the following composition and duties: A. The Technical Advisorv Committee - the responsibility of the Technical Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the TAC, shall be to serve the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters regarding all modes of travel, including promoting coordination among agencies, members, and transportation planning and programming; reviewing technical sufficiency, accr.rrtrcy and completeness of appropriate studies; making priority recommendations for the transportation plan and program implementation, and providing technical analyses on other transportation planning issues. The TAC shall be composed of thirteen (13) voting members and one (l) non-voting member appointed by the divisiorl department or agency that t}tey represent. TAC voting members may designate an alternate to replace them in their absence. B. Citizens Advisory Committee - the responsibility of the Citizen Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the CAC, is to advise the MPO reviewing, reacting to, and providing comment on transPortation planning issues and needs regarding all modes of travel fiom the citizens' perspectives. The CAC shall consist of voting members appointed by the MPO. Membership shall be composed of thirteen (13) citizens residing or whose principal place ofbusiness is located in the following areas: City of Naples (2), Collier County Unincorporated Area (5), coinciding with the established Collier County Commission Districts, City of Marco Island (1), City of Everglades Crty (1), including the area encompassing Chokoloskee and Plantation Island, and; Four (4) citizens at large, including a minimum ofone (1) citizen representing the disabled or an advocate for the disabled community, one (1) minority citizen, and two (2) appointed from Collier County to ensure adequate representation from all geographic areas of the county, and to include groups having civic, commtrnity and economic interests. C and Pedestrian Ad Comm - The responsibility of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the BPAC, is to provide citizen input into the deliberation of bicycle- and 4 @ 4.B.2 Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management pedestrian-related issues within the community, to advise the MPO on developing a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) that is responsive to the needs of the community, to recommend policies and advise the MPO Board of opportunities that will improve the walking and bicycling environment, recommend priorities for bicycle and pedestrian projects and program implementation, and contribute to the BPMP's vision and recommendations regarding the development of the bicycle and pedestrian network. Membership shall be composed of twelve (12) at-large voting members representing a wide cross-section of Collier County residents and neighborhoods, bicycle and pedestrian safety professionals, Safe Routes to Schools organizations, transit riders, local bicycle and pedestrian advocacy groups, organizations that encouage active transportation from a community health perspective, and advocates for persons with disabilities, and other transportation disadvantaged populations. D. The Coneestion t Committee the responsibility of the Congestion Management Committee, hereinafter referred to as the CMC, shall be to serve the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters relating to the update of the MPO's Congestion Management Process (CMP) and the coordination of the CMP with regional Congestion Management System and Intelligent Transportation System architecture. The CMC shall be composed of eleven (l l) voting members appointed by the division, departrnent or agency that they represent. CMC voting members may designate an altemate to replace them in their absence. E. The Local Coordinatine Board for the Transnortation Disadvantased - the responsibility of the Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged, hereinafter referred to as the LCB, shall be to assist the MPO in identifuing local service needs and providing information, advice and direction to the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) on the coordination of services to be provided to the transportation disadvantaged pursuant to Chapter 427.0157, Florida Statutes. In accordance with Rule 41-2.012, Florida Administration Code, all members of the LCB shall be appointed by the designated official planning agency. The designated oflicial planning agency for Collier County is the MPO. The LCB shall be composed of sixteen (16) voting members appointed by the division, department, or agency that they represent. LCB voting memben may designate an altemate to replace them in their absence. 5 @ 4.B.2 Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management 1.04 GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE MPO All public records of the MPO, TAC, CAC, BPAC, LCB and CMC Committee are open for inspection and examination at the office of the MPO, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. during regular business days. 1.05 PUBLIC ACCESS TO MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS All MPO, TAC, CAC, BPAC, LCB and CMC meetings, workshops and proceedings shall be open to the public. All parties to the Interlocal Agreement, as well as the FHWA and FTA shall have the rights of technical review and comment of MPO projects. Section 2 AGENDA. SCHE DULING and MEETINGS A. Except in the case of emergency meetings or workshops, the MPO shall give at least seven (7) days public notice of any meeting or workshop through the issuance of a prcss release to local print and broadcast media in the Naples Area B. The press release notice of such meeting or workshop shall provide: l. The date, time, and place of the event. 2. A brief description ofthe purpose ofthe event. 3. The address where interested parties may write to obtain a copy of the agenda. A copy of the Agenda may be obtained by writing to the Collier MPO, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Agendas may also be obtained by e-mail at collie rmpoi(r collicrqor'.nct or by accessing the MPO's Web site at colliermpo.net. 2.02 AGENDA A. At least seven (7) days prior to a meeting or workshop, the MPO staff shall prepare and make available an agenda for distribution on request by any interested person. The agenda shall list the items in the order they are to be considered; provided, however, that for good cause stated in the 6 1.06 RIGHTS OF REVIEW 2.OI NOTICE OF MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS @ 4.B.2 Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management record by the person who is designated to preside at the meeting, items may be considered out oftheir listed order. B. The agenda shall be specific as to the items to be considered. All matten shall be listed on the agenda. 1. Any person who desires to have an item placed on the agenda of the meeting of the MPO shall request in writing that the item be considered at the next scheduled meeting of the MPO, provided, however, that such a request must be received fourteen (14) days in advance of the scheduled meeting. Written requests for placing an item on the agenda must describe and summarize the item and shall be mailed or delivered to MPO, at the address in Section 2.01 (B) of these Bylaws. 2. Additional items not included on the meeting agenda may be considered at a meeting if the chairman or his designee feels that the item requires immediate action by the MPO. A. The MPO may hold an emergency meeting or workshop notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 2.01 and 2.02 ofthese Bylaws, for the purpose of acting upon matters affecting the public health, safety and welfare. B. Whenever an emergency meeting or workshop is scheduled to be held, the MPO shall notifu, as soon as possible prior to the meeting, at least one major newspaper of major circulation in the Naples Area stating time, date, place and purpose of the meeting or workshop. AMF],NDMENTS TO BYLAW S These Bylaws may be amended by a majority vote of the voting members, provided a copy of the proposed amendment shall have been sent to all members at least seven (7) calendar days prior to it being voted on. The MPO Board has sole authority to adopt and amend the bylaws of any advisory committee. These Bylaws and any and all amendments to the Bylaws will become effective upon endorsement of the Collier MPO. These Bylaws for the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization were hereby adopted in an open session with a quorum presenl and voting on May$;2020 October 9. 2020. 7 2.03 EMERGENCY MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS Section 3 @ 4.B.2 Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management By: METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Elaine Middelstaedt, MPO Char Attested Bv: Anne Mclaughlin, MPO Executive Director Approved as to form and legality: COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY By: Scott R. Teach Deputy County Attomey 8 4.B.2 Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: MPO Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (13756 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Regarding Congestion Management 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve an amendment to the Congestion Management Committee (CMC) bylaws. CONSIDERATIONS: MPO staff prepared an amendment to the CMC bylaws to bring them into conformity with the MPO Bylaws and in the process, added a recommendation that the MPO Board remove all non-voting memberships and change the Lee MPO membership from non-voting to voting. The proposed amendment to the CMC Bylaws is shown in Track Changes in Attachment 1 and as a clean copy in Attachment 2. The County Attorney’s Office has reviewed the amendment. The most substantial proposed revisions include: • Removing all non-voting memberships. Non-voting agencies have consistently not attended the CMC meeting. ▪ Adding the Lee MPO to the voting membership list. ▪ Changing the name on the bylaws from CMS/ITS Committee to CMC Committee ▪ Revising the purpose of the committee to match the MPO bylaws COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The CMC voted unanimously to approve the amendment to its bylaws at its meeting on July 15, 2020. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the amendment to the CMC bylaws. Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Principal Planner ATTACHMENT(S) 1. CMC Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (PDF) 2. CMC Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (PDF) 4.C Packet Pg. 30 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 4.C Doc ID: 13758 Item Summary: Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 12:13 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 12:13 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:36 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:38 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 4.C Packet Pg. 31 BYLAWS Congestion Management Committee of COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANZATION for I @ 4.C.1 Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: CMC Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (13758 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) The fotlowing Bylaws guide the proper functioning of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) Congestion Management @ €MSII+S) Committee (CMC). The intent is to provide procedures and policies to assist the CMCSIES€emmi*ee to accomplish is purpose. SECTION I NAME The name of this Committee shall be the Congestion Management SystemAntelligent @ommittee_1pNlc) of the collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). SECTTON II PURPOSE The CMeS#F-4emm*ee shall serve the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters relating to the arehi{e€ture uodate of the MPO's C onsestion Manasement s (CMP) and the coordination of the CMP with resional stion Manasement Svstem and Intellisent A e TransDortation System archi tecture. B The functions of this CMQ$ltt$€emdtee shall include, but not be limited to, the following: l. To promote coordination among the MPO, Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), Bicvcle and PedestrianPot&+vqts Advisory Committee @PAC) and CMe#f$€ommittee in the identification and resolution of common transportation problems; 2. To identiff potential multimodal projects that will reduce congestion on the network and/or improve the intelligent transportation system; 3. To review studies, plans, programs, or public information documents for potential impacts to congestion on the network and./or impacts to the intelligent transportation system and advise the MPO thereof; 4. To make priority recommendations for CMS/ITS projects to the MPO; 5. To review and update the Congestion Management Process (CMP) as needed; 6. To help review and update the Congestion Management Process component of the Long- Range Transportation Plan; 7. To assist in the development and evaluation of performance mezrsures of potential priorities, 8. To monitor CMS/ITS projects' performance after implementation. SECTION III MF'MBERSHIP APPOINTMENT AND TERM OF APPOINTMFNT A. Members: The CMCS#F$-€emmieee shall of eleven (11)members ln the di be that . CMC 2 @ 4.C.1 Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: CMC Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (13758 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) no*.I'letine memkrs mav desisnate an altemate to replace in their absence. B. Appointment and Term of Appointment: Each member agency representative shall be duly appointed by the member agency and shall serve at the pleasure of his or her member agency. The MPO Statr shall be notified by the Department Director/Administrator of the member agency in writing including electronic communication of the appointrnent or replacement of a member agency's representative. C. Alternate Member: An official alternate member can be designated by the affected voting- member agency by providing such designation in writing to the MPO. The so designated alternate member has the caPacitY to act on behalf of the voting member. MPe staff shatt be notifiC i least seyen (7) days ing,-The altemate member may vote only in the absence ofthe official voting member on a one-vote-per-member basis. D. The Voting amd*oa-Voting Member Agencies are as follows: 1. VOTINGMEMBERAGENCIES Collier County Growth Manage me n I Divis+en- D e part m e nl Transportation Planning DepahenlDivisign Traffi c Operations Depamea{-Divifiq! Collier County Public Services Department Divti;sier. Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Depafrment Division Collier County Administrative Servic e s Department Emergency Management Division Collier County Public Schools Transportation Departnent City of Naples Engineering/Planning Reprcsentative Traffi c Operations Reoresentative City of Marco Island Public Works Departrnent e+O-efberelaMi+ A4ar.or€+A,ppeinm€nt Collier MPO's Citizen Advisory Committee 3 @ 4.C.1 Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: CMC Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (13758 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) Collter MPO's Patl*+'qs-BjSlsk ngdlsdettjsn Advisory Committee Lee County MPo 2. NON-VETINC MEMBER gbriaaq'+Sll*reyM WieesWWWW Sas+Naptes-Pire+is** @M WW The MPO staff will be responsible for maintaining a current list of the names of voting and-{€n-+oting members. SECTION IV OFFICERS. DUTIES AND TRRMS OF OF'FTCE A. Ollicers and Terms of OIIice: I ^^ ('^.,-^, llDt) 1 A Chair and a Vice-Chair of the CMCS#tS-eemmittee shall be elected at the first regularly scheduled me€ting of each calendar year when a quorum is attained and shall hold the offices until their successors are elected. Any voting member may nominate or be nominated as an officer. All elections shall be held by the majority vote of voting members present. B. Chair Duties: 1. The Chair and Vice-Chair shall be voting members of the CMQSII-FS. 2 The Chair shall preside at all meetings and shall be responsible for the conduct ofsuch meetings. - In the absence of the Chair or Vice-Chair, the respective altemate may only act as a regular voting member of the Committee. 4 C. Vice-Chair Duties: 2. @ 4.C.1 Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: CMC Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (13758 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) The Vice- Chair shall, during the absence of the Chair, have and exercise all ofthe duties and powers of the Chair. The Vice- Chair shall also perform such duties as may be assigned by the Chair. D. Absenteeism of an Oflicer: If both the Chair and Vice-Chair are absent from a meeting, the Committee shall elect a voting member present to be the Chair for that meeting. No Altemate member of the Chair or Vice-chair can assume the responsibilities of his/trer official roles. Any vacancy in an office created by a resignation or replacement of an Officer shall be filled by a majority vote of voting memben. The Officer so elected shall fill t}le remainder of the unexpired term of the vacant office. If, at any time, the Committee believes that an Officer is not performing his/her duties in accordance with Section IV, Subsection B, it may recommend oflicer may be removed from ofEce by the MPO at a resular MPO meetins bv a le maioritv vote. 2 I 2 3 the removal of the Officer to the MPO. An SECTION V MIETINCS A. Regular Meetings: The CMQSIIT$€emmit+ee shall meet bimonthly at a date, time and place acceptable to a majority of the voting membership. The date or time may be changed by a majority vote ifseven (7) calendar days notice is given to the voting members' Special meetings may be called by the Chair with a minimum of three (3) calendar day's notice, indicating the reason for the meeting and notiffing all member agencies. C. Notice of Meetings: A minimum of seven (7) calendar days notice shall be given for regular meeting. Agendas should be sent with meeting notices and, whenever possible, minutes of the previous meedng, at least seven (7) calendar days prior to any regular meeting and at least three (3) calendar days prior to any special meeting. D. Agendas: MPO staff is responsible for preparing agendas for each CMCSA+S€ommi+ee meeting. 5 B. Special Meetings: 1 @ 4.C.1 Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: CMC Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (13758 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) Members may request to place items on the tentative agenda by notification to the MPO staff. Adry it€m reqiring €MMTS eo eennnittee shdl deeide if a€tien is te be tal'.en at that reeting er at a subsequent m€€tine A quorum shall consist of five (5) voting C Committee members. A majority of the quorum shall be necessary to act on an item brought before the CMCSms-eommis€e. tn *e aUsenee ef a gue it$ a€xt meeting wher€ t SI'CTION VI AMENDMI,NTS A. Amendments Recommended amendments to Tlhese Bylaws may be amende&endorsed by an affirmative quorum vote of the CMQS/FF$Gemorhee, provided a copy of the proposed amendment(s) shall have been sent to every member at least seven (7) calendar days prior to a vote for endorsement by the CMeS#t$€emmifiee. All proposed amendments shall be voted on at regular meetings. Any and all amendments to the Bylaws will become effective upon endersemeat adootion by the Collier MPO. B. Prior Agreement: These Bylaws supersede and replace any and all Bylaws previously adopted by the Congestion Management System/lntelligenl Transportation System Committee. C. Elfective Date: The Bylaws for the Congestion Management @ Committee of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization were hereby €depted endorsed in an open session with a quorum present and voting on September 16. 2020 by the Congestion Management @ Committee and subsequently endersed adopted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization on E. Quorum: 1. 2. 6 October 9 2020. @ 4.C.1 Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: CMC Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (13758 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) CONGESTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM/ INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM COMMITTEE By: Anthony Khawaja C MCSAF$€enrnni#ee C hair COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION By Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, Esq. MPO Chair ATTESTED BY: Anne Mclaughlin MPO Executive Director COUNTY ATTORNEY By Scott R Teach Deputy Comty Attomey 1 4.C.1 Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: CMC Bylaw Amendment in Track-Changes (13758 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) BYLAWS for Congestion Management Committee of COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION @ 4.C.2 Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: CMC Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (13758 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) A The following Bylaws guide the proper functioning of the Collier Metropolitan Planning organization's (MPo) congestion Management committee (cMC). The intent is to provide procedures and policies to assist the CMC to accomplish its purpose. SECTION T NAME The name of this Committee shall be the Congestion Management Committee (CMC) of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). SECTION II PURPOSE The CMC shall serve the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters relating to the update of the MPO's Congestion Management Process (CMP) and the coordination of the CMP with regional Congestion Management System and Intelligent Transportation System architectue. B. The firnctions of this CMC shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. To promote coordination among the MPO, Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) and CMC in the identification and resolution of common tansportation problems; 2. To identifu potential multimodal projects that will reduce congestion on the network and/or improve the intelligent transportation system; 3. To review studies, plans, programs, or public information documents for potential impacts to congestion on the network and,/or impacts to the intelligent transportation system and advise the MPO thereof; 4. To make priority recommendations for CMS/ITS projects to the MPO; 5. To review and update the Congestion Management Process (CMP) as needed; 6. To help review and update the Congestion Management Process component of the Long Range Transpo(ation Plan; 7. To assist in the development and evaluation of performance mezuiures of potential priorities, 8. To monitor CMS/ITS projects' performance after implementation. SECTION ITT MEMBERSHIP APPOINTMENT AND TERM OF APPOINTM['NT A. Members: The CMC shall be composed of eleven (l l) voting members appointed by the division, department or agency that they represent. CMC voting members may designate an altemate to replace them in their absence. 1. @ 4.C.2 Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: CMC Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (13758 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) B. Appointment and Term of Appointment: Each member agency representative shall be duly appointed by the member agency and shall serve at the pleasure of his or her member agency. The MPO Stafl shall be notified by the Department Director/Administrator of the member agency in writing including electronic communication of the appointment or replacement of a member agency's representative. C. Alternate Member: An official altemate member can be designated by the affected voting- member agency by providing such designation in writing to the MPO. The so designated altemate member has the capacity to act on khalf of the voting member. The altemate member may vote only in the absence of the official voting member on a one-vote-per-member basis. D. The Voting Member dencies are as follows: I. VOTINGMEMBERAGENCIES Collier County Growth Management Department Transportation Planning Division Traffrc Operations Division Collier County Public Services Department Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Division C ollier C ounty Administrat ive Service s Department Emergency Management Division Collier County Public Schools Transportation Departnent City of Naples Engineering/Planning Representative Traffi c Operations Representative City of Marco Island Public Works Department Collier MPO's Citizen Advisory Committee Collier MPO's Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Lee County MPO The MPO staff will be responsible for maintaining a current list of the names of voting members. l @ 4.C.2 Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: CMC Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (13758 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) SECTION TV OFFICERS. DUTIES AND TERMS OF OFFICE A. Oflicers and Terms of OfIice: A Chair and a Vice-Chair of the CMC shall be elected at the first regularly scheduled meeting of each calendar year when a quorum is attained and shall hold the offices until their successors are elected. Any voting member may nominate or be nominated as an offtcer. All elections shall be held by the majority vote of voting members present. B. Chair Duties: 1. The Chair and Vice-Chair shall be voting members of the CMeSmS. 2 The Chair shall preside at all meetings and shall be responsible for the conduct ofsuch meetings. [n the absence of the Chair or Vice-Chair, the respective alternate may only act as a regular voting member of the Committee. The Vice- Chair shall, during the absence of the Chair, have and exercise all of the duties and powers of the Chair. The Vice- Chair shall also perform such duties as may be assigned by the Chat. D. Absenteeism of an O{Iicer: If both the Chair and Vice-Chair are absent from a meeting, the Committee shall elect a voting member present to be the Chair for that meeting. No Alternate member of the Chair or Vice-chair can assume the responsibilities of his/her official roles' Any vacancy in an office created by a resignation or replacement of an Officer shall be filled by a majority vote of voting members. The Officer so elected shall fill the remainder of the unexpired term ofthe vacant office. If, at any time, the Committee believes that an Officer is not performing his/her duties in accordance with Section IV, Subsection B, it may recommend the removal of the Offrcer to the MPO. An officer may be removed from office by the MPO Board at a regular MPO meeting by a simple majority vote. SECTION V MEETINGS 2 2 I 2 J 4 A. Regular Meetingsl C. Vice-Chair Duties: I I @ 4.C.2 Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: CMC Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (13758 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) The CMC shall meet bimonthly at a date, time and place acceptable to a majority of the voting membership. The date or time may be changed by a majority vote if seven (7) calendar days notice is given to the voting members. B. Special Meetings: Special meetings may be called by the Chair with a minimum of three (3) calendar day's notice, indicating the reason for the meeting and notifring all member agencies. C. Notice of Meetings: A minimum of seven (7) calendar days notice shall be given for regular meeting. Agendas should be sent with meeting notices and, whenever possible, minutes of lhe privious meeting, at least seven (7) calendar days prior to any regular meeting and at least three (3) calendar days prior to any special meeting. D. Agendas: Mpo staff is responsible for preparing agendas for each cMC meeting. Members may request to place items on the tentative agenda by notification to the MPO staff' E. Quorum: 1. A quorum shall consist of five (5) voting CMeS/ITS Cglqlqittgg members' 2. A majority ofthe quorum shall be necessary to act on an item brought before the CMC. SECTION VI AMENDMENTS A. Amendments Recommended amendments to these Bylaws may be endorsed by an affirmative quonrm vote of the CMC, provided a copy of the proposed amendment(s) shall have been sent to every member at least seven (7) calendar days prior to a vote for endorsement by the CMa. A[ proposed amendments shall be voted on at regular meetings' Any- and all amendments to ahe Bylaws will become effective upon adoption by the Collier MPO. B. Prior Agreement: These Bylaws supersede and replace any and all Bylaws previously adopted by the Congestion Management System.{ntelligent Transportation System Committee' 5 @ 4.C.2 Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: CMC Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (13758 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) C. Effective Date: The Bylaws for the Congestion Management Committee of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization were hereby endorsed in an open session with a quonrm present and voting on September 16, 2020-by the Congestion Management Committee and subsequently adopted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization on October 9, 2020. 6 @ 4.C.2 Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: CMC Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (13758 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) CONGESTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEIvI/ INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM COMMITTEE By: Anthony Khawaja CMC Chair COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANZATION By: Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, Esq. MPO Chair ATTESTED BY: Anne Mclaughlin MPO Executive Director COLNryATTORNEY By Scott R Teach Deputy Comty Attomey 1 @ 4.C.2 Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: CMC Bylaw Amendment - Clean Copy (13758 : Approve Amendment to Congestion Management Committee Bylaws) 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Bylaws OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve an amendment to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) Bylaws CONSIDERATIONS: The amendment to the BPAC Bylaws is intended to bring them into conformity with the current adopted MPO Bylaws. The draft changes have been reviewed by the County Attorney’s office. The proposed revisions are shown in Attachment 1; a clean version is provided in Attachment 2. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The BPAC voted unanimously to approve the amendment at their meeting on September 15, 2020. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the amendment to the BPAC Bylaws. Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Track Changes (PDF) 2. BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Clean Version (PDF) 4.D Packet Pg. 46 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 4.D Doc ID: 13759 Item Summary: Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Bylaws Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 12:36 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 12:36 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 1:27 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 2:34 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 4.D Packet Pg. 47 BYLAWS for BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS r'DVISORY COMMITTEE of COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANZATION @ 4.D.1 Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Track Changes (13759 : Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Bylaws) COLLIER COUNTY P#Hilry#Il BICYCLE AND PED ESTRIAN ADYISORY COMMITTEE BYLAWS The following Bylaws guide the proper firnctioning of the Collier Metropolitan Plarming Organization's (MPO) Pathivafs Bicvcle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. The intent is to provide procedures and policies to assist the @ Advisory committee to accomplish its purpose. SECTION I:NAME The name of this Committee shall be the @ Advisory Committee (hereinafter the *BPAC') of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (hereinafter, the "MPO"). SECTIONII: PURPOSE A. The purpose of the EPAC is to provide citizen input into the preeess-ef deliberation oft @-related issues within the community,to advise the develooins a Bicvcle and Pedestrian Master Plan GPMP) that is res ive to the needs of the communitv. to recommend DO licies and advise the MPO Board of oonorh.rnities that will imorove the walkine and bi cv cl ins environment. recommend prioriti es for bicvcle and pedestrian proi ects and Droqram implementati on. and contribute to the BPMP's vision and the develo of stnan @xaysfr€gram: B. The mission of the BPAC is to promote walking and bicycling as integral components of local, regional and state recrealional and transportation networks. e , The fi*retiens ef the Pr\e shdl inelude; but net be llnited te; the fellewing: # rvalkir€ and bieyeling envirennrent in €ellier MPO's plarrring aree, 2 @ 4.D.1 Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Track Changes (13759 : Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Bylaws) n€Sil,erl<; i€s, SECTION III:OF Voting Members: MEMBERSHIP, APPOINTMENT AI{D TERM APPOINTMENT, AIID TERMINATION OF MEMBERSHIP A B. Appointment and Term of Appointment: l. All BPAC members are appointed by the MPO for a fixed term of two (2) years. 2. Reappoinunent to additional terrn(s) may be approved by the MPO at the written request of the BPAC member. C. Termination of Membership: If at any time, the MPO believes that any pPAC member is not performing his or her duties in accordance with ttrese bylaws, tle MPO may remove that member from the BPAC. SECTION IV: OFFICERS, TERMS OF OFFICE, AND DUTIES A. Officers and Terms of Offrce: 1. A Chair and a Vice-Chair of the BPAC shall be elected at the first regularly scheduled meeting of each calendar year when a quonrm is attained and shall hold the oftices until their successors are elected. 2. Any voting member may nominate or be nominated as an officer. All elections shall be held by the majority vote of voting members present. 3. The Chair and Vice-Chair shall serve for a period of one (l) year or until a successor is elected. 3 The BPAC shall be composed of ],{ine-1rv9,!y9-(91? eitizens-atJarge voting members reoresenting a wide cross-section of Collier Counw residents and neighborhoods. bicvcle and pedestrian safety orofessionals. Safe Routes to Schools oreanizations. transit riders. local bicvcle and oedestrian advocacy pnoups. orearizations that encourage active transportation from a community health perspective. and advocates for persons with disabilities. and other transportation disadvantaeed oopulations. @ 4.D.1 Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Track Changes (13759 : Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee 4. The Chair and Vice-Chair shall be voting members of the BPAC. B. Chair Duties: l. The Chair shall preside at all meetings and shall be responsible for the conduct of such meetings. Chair collaborate tq establish the agenda for meetings-The Chai+and act! as a liaison with govemmental bodies and other related committees. C. Vice-Chair Duties l. The Vice-Chair shall, during the absence of the Chair, have and exercise all of the duties and powers ol the Chair. 2. The Vice-Chair shall also perform such duties as may be assigned by the Chair. D. Absenteeism of en Ofticer: If both the Chair and Vice-Chair are absent fiom a meeting, the Committee shall elect a voting member present to be the Chair for that meeting. 1 . Any vacancy in an office created by a resignation or replacement of an Officer shall be filled by a majority vote of voting members. 2. The Officer so elected shall fill the remainder ofthe unexpired tenn of the vacant office. 3. If, at any time, the Committee believes that an Officer is not performing his/her duties in accordance with Section IV, Subsection B and C, it may recommend the removal of the Offrcer to the MPO. SECTION V: MEETINGS A. Regular Meetings: The BPAC shall meet as often as necessary in order to meet its responsibilities. A meeting schedule shall be developed annually, endorsed by the BPAC and approved by the MPO. B. Special Meetings: Special meetings may be called by the Chair in coordination with the MPO with a minimum of three (3) calendar days' notice, indicating the reason for the meeting and notirying all member agencies. 2 l @ 4.D.1 Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Track Changes (13759 : Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee A minimum of seven (7) calendar days notice shall be given for regular meetings. Agendas should be sent with meeting notices and, wherever possible, minutes of the previous meeting, at least seven (7) calendar days prior to any regular meeting and at least three (3) calendar days prior to any spe,cial meeting. D. Agendas: MPO staff is responsible for preparing agendas for each BPAC meeting. Members may request to place items on the tentative agenda by notification to the MPO staff. Anflitem is net on *te r€endr; by m ine E. Quorum: L A quorum shall consist of a majority of the voting members. F. Voting: An affrrmative vote of a majority of the BPAC members pfsgeil! o+*€-€€ti+e-rester shall be necessary in order to take any action. G. Public Meetings: All meetings of the BPAC are open to the public and all activities of the BPAC are subject to the Florida Government in the Sunshine Law, Chapter 286, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Sunshine Law. H.Parliamentary Procedures: Except as otherwise provided in these Bylaws, Roberts Rules of Order shall be followed at all meetings. Strff 1. The MPO shall provide the BPAC with sufticient staff support and resources to enable it to fulfill its responsibilities. 2. MPO staff shall manage and oversee the operations of the BPAC and assist in scheduling meetings, preparing agenda packets, and other necessary administrative duties as required by the BPAC within the limits of the resources available. I. 5 C. Notice of Meetings: @ 4.D.1 Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Track Changes (13759 : Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee + Statr shall maintain the minutes and other records of the BPAC. The-minutes-shdl J. Attendance: 1. It is the intent and strong desire of the MPO that there be full attendance of the BPAC members at all BPAC meetings; recogrizing, however, that it may be necessary for BPAC members to be absent from a meeting due to unusual or emergency circumstances, Nevertheless, full attendance at BPAC meetings is encouraged and necessary for the proper operation of the BPAC, and in furtherance thereof, the following requirements are established. 2. Any BPAC member who is absent from three consecutive OR four (4) out of six (6) regularly scheduled BPAC meetings shall be deemed to have tendered his or her resignation from the BPAC. 3. The MPO shall, as soon as practical after such resignation, declare the position to be vacant and shall promptly hll same. 4. No pPAC member shall serve at any meetings after he/she is deemed to have tendered his/her resignation. SECTION VI:AMENDMENTS A. Amendments: Amendments to lThese Bylaws may be endorsed ameadeC by an affrrmative vote of the BPAC, provided a copy of the proposed amendment(s) shall have been sent to every member at least seven (7) calendar days prior to a vote for endonement by the BPAC. All proposed amendments shall be voted on at regular meetings. Any and all amendments to the Bylaws *illffitiyeupen are subiect to aporoval endersemeat by the Collier MPO. B. Prior Agreement: These Bylaws supersede and replace any and all Bylaws previously adopted by the Palhrvays Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. C. Effective Date: These Bylaws for the Pathr*ays Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee of the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization alg r#eFe hereby adopted endorsed in an open session with a quonrm present and voting on No+emberl,-2e14 Seotember 15. 2020 by the Pathr#ars Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and subsequently adopted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization on DeeembertL4el4 October 9. 2020. 6 @ 4.D.1 Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Track Changes (13759 : Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee BICYCLE AND PED AD VISORY COMMITTEE By: Joe Bonness BPAC Chair COLLIER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION By: Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, Esq. MPO Chair Attested by: Anne Mclaughlin MPO Executive Director COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY By: Scott R. Teach Deputy County Attorney 1 @ 4.D.1 Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Track Changes (13759 : Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee BYLAWS for BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE of COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION I @ 4.D.2 Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Clean Version (13759 : Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Bylaws) The following Bylaws guide the proper functioning of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. The intent is to provide procedures and policies to assist the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory committee to accomplish its purpose. SECTION I:NAME The name of this Committee shall be the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (hereinafter the "BPAC") of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (hereinafter, the *MPO"). Sf,CTION II:PURPOSE A. The purpose of the BPAC is to provide citizen input into the deliberation of bicycle- and pedestrian-related issues within the community, to advise the MPO on developing a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) that is responsive to the needs of the community, to recommend policies and advise the MPO Board of opportunities that will improve the walking and bicycling environment, recommend priorities for bicycle and pedestrian projects and program implementation, and contribute to the BPMP's vision and recommendations regarding the development ofthe bicycle and pedestrian network. B. The mission of the BPAC is to promote walking and bicycling as integral components of local, regional and state recreational and transportation networks. SECTION III:OF Voting Members: The BPAC shall be composed of twelve (12) at-large voting members representing a wide cross-section of Collier County residents and neighborhoods, bicycle and pedestrian safery professionals, Safe Routes to Schools organizations, transit riders, local bicycle and pedestrian advocacy groups, organizations that encourage active transportation from a community health perspective, and advocates for persons with disabilities, and other transportation disadvantaged populations. B. Appointment and Term of Appointment: l. All BPAC members are appointed by the MPO for a fixed term of two (2) years. MEMBERSHIP, APPOINTMENT AND TERM APPOINTMENT, AND TERMINATION OF MEMBERSHIP A. 2 COLLIER COUNTY BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE BYLAWS @ 4.D.2 Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Clean Version (13759 : Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Bylaws) 2. Reappointment to additional term(s) may be approved by the MPO at the written request of the BPAC member. 1. A Chair and a Vice-Chair of the BPAC shall be elected at the first regularly scheduled meeting of each calendar year when a quomm is attained and shall hold the offices until their successors are elected. 2. Any voting member may nominate or be nominated as an offrcer. All elections shall be held by the majority vote of voting members present. 3. The Chair and Vice-Chair shall serve for a period of one (l) year or until a successor is elected. 4. The Chair and Vice-Chair shall be voting members of the BPAC. B. Chair Duties: l. The Chair shall preside at all meetings and shall be responsible for the conduct of such meetings. 2. The Chair and the MPO Director shall collaborate to establish the agenda for meetings. The Chair acts as a liaison with govemmental bodies and other related committees. C. Vice-Chair Duties 1. The Vice-Chair shall, during the absence of the Chair, have and exercise all ofthe duties and powers of the Chair. 2. The Vice-Chair shall also perform such duties as may be assigned by the Chair. D. Absenteeism of an Ofticer: If both the Chair and Vice-Chair are absent from a meeting, the Committee shall elect a voting member present to be the Chair for that meeting. C. Terminetion of Memberrhip: If at any time, the MPO believes that any BPAC member is not performing his or her duties in accordance with these bylaws, the MPO may remove that member from the BPAC. SECTION IV: OFFICERS, TERMS OF OFFICE, AND DUTIES A. Ollicers and Terms of Office: @ 4.D.2 Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Clean Version (13759 : Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Bylaws) l. Any vacancy in an offrce created by a resignation or replacement ofan Officer shall be filled by a majority vote of voting members. 2. The OIficer so elected shall fill the remainder of the unexpired term ofthe vacant offrce. 3. If, at any time, the Committee believes that an Officer is not performing his/her duties tn accordance with Section IV, Subsection B and C, it may recommend the removal of the Officer to the MPO. SECTION V:MEE,TIN(]S A. Regular Meetings: The BPAC shall meet as often as necessary in order to meet its responsibilities. A meeting schedule shall be developed annually, endorsed by the BPAC and approved by the MPO. B. Special Meetings: Special meetings may be called by the Chair in coordination with the MPO Director with a minimum of three (3) calendar days' notice, indicating the reason for the meeting and notifring all member agencies. C. Notice of Meetings: A minimum of seven (7) calendar days notice shall be given for regular meetings. Agendas should be sent with meeting notices and, wherever possible, minutes of the previous meeting, at least seven (7) calendar days prior to any regular meeting and at least three (3) calendar days prior to any special meeting. D. Agendas: MPO staff is responsible for preparing agendas for each BPAC meeting. Members may request to place items on the tentative agenda by notification to the MPO staff. E. Quorum: 1. A quorum shall consist of a majority of the voting members. F. Voting: An affirmative vote of a majority of the BPAC members present shall be necessary in order to take any action. 4 @ 4.D.2 Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Clean Version (13759 : Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Bylaws) G H Public Meetings: All meetings of the BPAC are open to the public and all activities of the BPAC are subject to the Florida Govemment in the Sunshine Law, Chapter 286, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Sunshine Law. Parliamentery Procedures: Except as otherwise provided in these Bylaws, Roberts Rules of Order shall be followed at all meetings. I. Staff 1 The MPO shall provide the BPAC with sufficient staff support and resources to enable it to fulfill its responsibilities. MPO staff shali manage and oversee the operations of the BPAC and assist in scheduling meetings, pieparing agenda packets, and other necessary adminisuative duties as iequired Uy ttre SpaC *ithin the limits of the resources available. Staff shall maintain the minutes and other records of the BPAC. 2 J. Attendance SECTIONYI: AMENDMENTS A. Amendmentsl 1. It is the intent and strong desire of the MPO that there be fi l attendance of the BPAC members at all BPAC meetings; recogrrizing, however, that it may be necessary for BPAC members to be absent fiom a meeting due to unusual or emergency circumstances. Nevertheless, full attendance at BPAC meetings is encouraged and necessary for the proper operation of the BPAC, and in furtherance thereof, the following requirements are establi shed. 2. Any BpAt member who is absent from three consecutive OR four (4) out of six (6) relularly scheduled BPAC meetings shall be deemed to have tendered his or her resignation from the BPAC. 3. fne tr{pO shall, as soon as practical after such resignation, declare the position to be vacant and shall promptly fill same' 4. No BPAC membir shall serve at any meetings after he/she is deemed to have tendered his/her resignation. Amendments to these Bylaws may be endorsed by an affrrmative vote of the BPAC, provided a copy of the pioposed amendment(s) shall have been sent to every member at 'least seven (Zj calenaar days prior to a vote for endorsement by the BPAC. All proposed amendments shall be voted onat regular meetings. Any and all amendments to the Bylaws are subject to approval by the Collier MPO. 5 @ 4.D.2 Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Clean Version (13759 : Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Bylaws) B. Prior Agreement: These Bylaws supersede and replace any and all Bylaws previously adopted by the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. C. Effective Date: These Bylaws for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee of the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization are hereby endorsed in an open session with a quorum present and voting on September 15,2020 by the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory committee and subsequently adopted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning organization on October 9,2020. 6 @ 4.D.2 Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Clean Version (13759 : Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Bylaws) BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE By: Joe Bonness BPAC Chair COLLIT]R COUNTY METROPOLITAN G ORGANIZATION Byt Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, Esq. MPO Chair Attested by: Anne Mclaughlin MPO Executive Director COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY By Scott R. Teach Deputy County Attomey 7 4.D.2 Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: BPAC Bylaws Amendment – Clean Version (13759 : Approve Amendment to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Bylaws) 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (Contract #19-7562, Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.) OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to approve a zero dollar change order granting a time extension for the Strategic highway Safety Plan (Contract 19-7562, Tindale Oliver & Associates, Inc.) CONSIDERATIONS: The Collier MPO has adopted and procures goods and services under the policy set forth in the Collier County Procurement Ordinance (Ordinance No. 2017-08, as amended). Under Section 19.3.a, Contract Administration, of that Ordinance, change orders issued under a purchase order or contract that exceed ten percent (10%) of a current Board approved aggregate amount, or twenty percent (20%) of the current Board approved number of days must be approved by the Board. In this instance, the attached Change Order seeks approval to add a period of additional days less than 20% of the original MPO Board approved contract. Because the Collier MPO Board approves all its own contracts with vendors, all future proposed change orders that exceed those threshold amounts will be brought to the MPO Board for approval. Those under the threshold amount will be administratively processed and made part of the contractual record. The SHSP (now known as the Local Roads Safety Plan) will be reviewed by advisory committees in September and brought to the MPO Board on October 9, 2020 for approval. The contract expires on October 10, 2020, which does not allow adequate time to produce revisions if necessary. Therefore, staff is requesting a contract extension through December 31, 2020. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: This item is administrative in nature and does not require committee action. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the change order. Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Change Order (PDF) 2. Executed Contract (PDF) 4.E Packet Pg. 62 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 4.E Doc ID: 13744 Item Summary: Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (Contract #19-7562, Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.) Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 9:23 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 9:23 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:04 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:06 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 4.E Packet Pg. 63 Revised: 10/28/2014 (Divisions who may require additional signatures may include on separate sheet.) PROCUREMENT USE ONLY Admin BCC Rpt BCC ES 1 Contract Modification Work Order Modification Amendment Contract #: Change #: Purchase Order #: Project #: Contractor/Firm Name: Contract/Project: Project Manager Name: r: Division Name: Completion Date, Description of the Task(s) Change, and Rationale for the Change Notice to Proceed Original Last Approved Revised Date Date Completion Date Date (Includes this change) # of Days Added Select Tasks Add new task(s) Delete task(s) Change task(s) Other (see below) Provide a response to the following: 1.) detailed and specific explanation/rationale of the requested change(s) to the task(s) and / or the additional days added (if requested); 2.) why this change was not included in the original contract; and, 3.) describe the impact if this change is not processed. Attach additional information from the Design Professional and/or Contractor if needed. Prepared by: Brandy Otero, Principal Planner Collier MPO Date: 9/23/20 (Project Manager Name and Division) p Acceptance of this Change Order shall constitute a modification to contract / work order identified above and will be subject to all the same terms and conditions as contained in the contract / work order indicated above, as fully as if the same were stated in this acceptance. The adjustment, if any, to the Contract shall constitute a full and final settlement of any and all claims of the Contractor / Vendor / Consultant / Design Professional arising out of or related to the change set forth herein, including claims for impact and delay costs. Accepted by: ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: ________________ (Contractor / Vendor / Consultant / Design Professional and Name of Firm, if project applicable) Approved by: ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: ________________ (Design Professional and Name of Firm, if project applicable) Approved by: ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: ________________ Procurement Services 33557.5.2.3 Tindale Oliver and Associates 4500200070 19-7562 1 Stategic Highway Safety Plan Collier MPO Anne McLaughlin 12/31/20 11/4/2020 11/4/2020 57 11/5/2019 1. Add 57 days to contract to allow for presentations to advisory committees and MPO Board in November and December 2020. 2. Due to Covid-19, the MPO Board cancelled all advisory committee meetings and several MPO Board meetings. This caused a time delay of several months in the project. This pandemic and limiting of meetings was not anticipated in the contract. 3. The consultant will not be able to assist with conducting presentations and responding to questions on highly technical material. The advisory committee and Board presentations may indicate a need for further refinement of the draft document prior to adoption by the MPO Board. If this change is not processed, the consultant will not be able to complete that portion of the scope. Original Contract/Work Order Amount $ 184,750.00 10/11/2019 Original BCC Approval Date; Agenda Item # Current BCC Approved Amount $ 184,750.00 10/11/2019 Last BCC Approval Date; Agenda Item # Current Contract/Work Order Amount $ 184,750.00 11/4/2020 SAP Contract Expiration Date (Master) Dollar Amount of this Change $ 0.00 0.00%Total Change from Original Amount Revised Contract/Work Order Total $ 184,750.00 0.00%Change from Current BCC Approved Amount Cumulative Changes $ 0.00 0.00%Change from Current Amount 4.E.1 Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Change Order (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 65Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 66Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 67Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 68Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 69Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 70Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 71Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 72Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 73Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 74Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 75Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 76Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 77Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 78Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 79Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 80Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 81Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 82Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 83Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 84Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 85Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 86Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 87Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 88Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 89Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 90Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 91Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 92Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 93Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 94Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 95Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 96Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 97Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 98Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 99Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 100Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 101Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 102Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 103Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 104Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 105Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 106Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 107Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 108Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 109Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 110Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 111Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 112Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 113Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 114Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 115Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 116Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 4.E.2Packet Pg. 117Attachment: Executed Contract (13744 : Approval of Zero Dollar Change Order granting a time extension for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan) 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11 OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to approve the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11. CONSIDERATIONS: FTA § 5305(d) funds are used for transit planning studies that are identified in the 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (“UPWP”). Upon notification of the annual allocation, it is necessary for the MPO to apply for the funding through the Florida Department of Transportation. The amount available for Fiscal Year 2021 is $160,035. This includes a federal amount of $128,028 and a match in the amount of $16,003 for the State and $16,004 for local jurisdictions. A resolution is required to authorize the MPO Chairperson to file and execute the grant application, as well as empower the Executive Director to make minor revisions to correctly reflect actual dollars allocated, if necessary. Resolution 2020-11 is included as Attachment 1. The Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424) and budget forms are included as Attachment 2. The required grant forms and certifications are included as Attachment 3. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Advisory Committees previously endorsed the UPWP identifying Section 5305(d) funding for FY 2021. This application is administrative and was not presented to the committees for review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the FTA Grant Application for Section 5305(d) and Resolution 2020-11. Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Principal Planner ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Resolution 2020-11 (PDF) 2. Application for Federal Assistance and Budget Forms (PDF) 3. Grant Forms and Certifications (PDF) 4.F Packet Pg. 118 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 4.F Doc ID: 13767 Item Summary: Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11 Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 2:52 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 2:52 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 3:40 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 3:45 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 4.F Packet Pg. 119 4.F.1 Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Resolution 2020-11 (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.1 Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Resolution 2020-11 (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.2 Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Application for Federal Assistance and Budget Forms (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and 4.F.2 Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Application for Federal Assistance and Budget Forms (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and 4.F.2 Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Application for Federal Assistance and Budget Forms (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and 4.F.2 Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Application for Federal Assistance and Budget Forms (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and 4.F.2 Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Application for Federal Assistance and Budget Forms (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 4.F.3 Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Grant Forms and Certifications (13767 : Approval of the FTA Transit Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2020-11) 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) related to recent committee actions and recommendations. CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The CAC Chair will provide a verbal report providing additional information regarding recent committee activities. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. CAC Chair Report (DOCX) 7.A.1 Packet Pg. 152 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 7.A.1 Doc ID: 13745 Item Summary: Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 9:25 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 9:25 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:26 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:31 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 7.A.1 Packet Pg. 153 CAC Committee Chair Report The Citizens Advisory Committee met virtually (using ZOOM platform) on September 28th and achieved a quorum. Agency Reports FDOT – Ms. Peters – provided information on the schedule for the new draft Tentative Work Program FY 22-26: • November 30 - presentation to TAC and CAC • December 8 - Public open house at County Regional Headquarters Library on Orange Blossom Rd 11am – 1pm • December 8-11- E-Public Hearing date TBD • December 11 – presentation to MPO Board MPO Director – Ms. McLaughlin announced the cancellation of Joint Lee County/Collier MPO Board and advisory committee meetings this fall. Committee Actions • Endorsed amendment to the 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Regarding Projects on SR 29 that are currently in the TIP • Approved for moving forward the following draft components of the 2045 LRTP: o Chapter 4 Systemwide Needs Assessment o Chapter 5 Financial Resources o Cost Feasible List of Projects • Received presentation and commented on Local Roads Safety Plan Technical Memos – Statistical Analysis and Recommendations • Endorsed the FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP Amendment Reports and Presentations • Received a report on FDOT’s White paper on Connected and Automated Vehicles Distribution Items • None The next meeting is scheduled to occur on October 26 at 2:00 p.m. at the GMD in a location TBD. Staff is looking for a larger conference room for the committee to meet in, in order to accommodate social distancing. 7.A.1.a Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: CAC Chair Report (13745 : Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report) 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Technical Advisory Committee related to recent committee actions and recommendations. CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. Staff typically provides a verbal report at the MPO Board meeting, although the Chair is welcome to do so. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. TAC Chair Report (DOCX) 7.B.1 Packet Pg. 155 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 7.B.1 Doc ID: 13746 Item Summary: Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 9:28 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 9:28 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 1:34 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 2:27 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 7.B.1 Packet Pg. 156 TAC Committee Chair Report The Technical Advisory Committee met on September 28, 2020 and a quorum was achieved. Agency Reports FDOT – Ms. Peters – provided information on the schedule for the new draft Tentative Work Program FY 22-26: • November 30 - presentation to TAC and CAC • December 8 - Public open house at County Regional Headquarters Library on Orange Blossom Rd 11am – 1pm • December 8-11- E-Public Hearing date TBD • December 11 – presentation to MPO Board MPO Director – Ms. McLaughlin announced the cancellation of Joint Lee County/Collier MPO Board and advisory committee meetings this fall. Committee Actions • Endorsed amendment to the 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Regarding Projects on SR 29 that are currently in the TIP • Approved for moving forward the following draft components of the 2045 LRTP: o Chapter 4 Systemwide Needs Assessment o Chapter 5 Financial Resources o Cost Feasible List of Projects • Received presentation and commented on Local Roads Safety Plan Technical Memos – Statistical Analysis and Recommendations • Endorsed the FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP Amendment Reports and Presentations • Received a briefing on FDOT’s White paper on Connected and Automated Vehicles Distribution Items • None The next meeting is scheduled to occur on October 26, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. at the GMD conference rooms 609/610. 7.B.1.a Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: TAC Chair Report (13746 : Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report) 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) related to recent committee actions and recommendations. CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The BPAC Chair will provide a verbal report providing additional information regarding recent committee activities. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Executive Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. BPAC Chair Report (DOCX) 7.C.1 Packet Pg. 158 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 7.C.1 Doc ID: 13748 Item Summary: Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 10:43 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 10:43 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:25 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:30 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 7.C.1 Packet Pg. 159 BPAC Committee Chair Report The Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) met using ZOOM as a virtual meeting platform on September 15, 2020 and a quorum was achieved. Agency Reports FDOT – Ms. Peters reported that FDOT is ready to approve the removal of reflective pavement markers near bridges on US 41 east as Patty huff had requested about a year ago. The removal will be put out for bid and hopefully completed within about six months. FDOT study found that a traffic light at Westclox Street and SR 29 in Immokalee is warranted. FDOT will start on the design phase soon. Committee member questioned whether SUNTrail application on US41 east will be submitted. Ms. Scott explained the County’s reluctance to agree to maintaining state road ROW versus support for SunTrail application within FPL easement along Livingston Rd. Committee Actions • The Committee had lengthy discussion regarding amendment to BPAC bylaws, concluded by voting unanimously to endorse the amendment. • The Committee received an overview of the bicycle and pedestrian component of the Draft Needs Plan, which is Chapter 4 Needs Plan of the 2045 LRTP. The Committee had a lengthy discussion on the Needs Plan. The general consensus was that revisions MPO staff had proposed were sufficient to address members concerns. Reports and Presentations • None Member Comments • Committee members provided updates on Everglades City’s proposed road diet on CR 29 and upcoming Bike to Work Day events sponsored by the Blue Zones Initiative. The next regularly scheduled meeting is on October 20, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. 7.C.1.a Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: BPAC Chair Report (13748 : Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report) 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Congestion Management Committee Chair Report OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Congestion Management Committee related to recent committee actions and recommendations. CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. Staff typically provides a verbal report at the MPO Board meeting, although the Chair is welcome to do so. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. CMC Chair Report (DOCX) 7.D.1 Packet Pg. 161 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 7.D.1 Doc ID: 13749 Item Summary: Congestion Management Committee Chair Report Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 10:46 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 10:46 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 1:23 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 2:36 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 7.D.1 Packet Pg. 162 CMC Committee Chair Report The Congestion Management Committee (CMC) met using ZOOM as a virtual meeting platform on September 16, 2020 and a quorum was achieved. The committee received agency updates from FDOT and committee members. Committee Action Items • The Committee reviewed 5 projects submitted in response to the MPO’s Call for Congestion Management Projects. The purpose of the initial review is to establish eligibility for funding according to the MPO’s Congestion Management Process and the newly approved Transportation System Performance Report and Action Plan. The Committee determined that all 5 projects met the eligibility criteria and would move onto the next phase which is to submit more detailed project descriptions and report on evaluation criteria and performance measures to be used to rate and rank the projects. This will occur at the next regular Committee meeting. Reports and Presentations • none The next regularly scheduled meeting will be held on November 18, 2020 at 2 p.m. 7.D.1.a Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: CMC Chair Report (13749 : Congestion Management Committee Chair Report) 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Local Coordinating Board Chair Report OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Local Coordinating Board (LCB) related to recent LCB actions and recommendations. CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The LCB Chair may provide additional information to the Board. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable Prepared by: Josephine Medina, Senior Planner ATTACHMENT(S) 1. LCB Chair Report (DOCX) 7.E.1 Packet Pg. 164 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 7.E.1 Doc ID: 13750 Item Summary: Local Coordinating Board Chair Report Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 10:50 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 10:50 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:28 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:32 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 7.E.1 Packet Pg. 165 LCB Chair Report The Local Coordinating Board (LCB) conducted a hybrid virtual meeting on September 16th and a quorum was not achieved but non-action items were presented to the board. The LCB were presented with the following items: • A presentation on the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and its impact on Transportation Disadvantaged system. • Harold Kurzman, LCB Vice-Chair was presented with a certificate and letter of appreciation for serving 9 continuous years as the LCB Vice-Chair for a total of 14 years as a citizen member of the LCB. • Commissioner Fiala was presented with a plaque and cake from Collier MPO and PTNE staff thanking for her 18 years of service as LCB chair and her lifelong commitment to the Transportation Disadvantaged Community. The Local Coordinating Board (LCB) conducted a virtual meeting on September 29th and a quorum was achieved. The LCB took the following action at the meeting: • Reviewed and approved the FY 19/20 Annual Operating Report (AOR). • Review and approved the LCB Membership Certification. • Reviewed and approved the Eligibility Criteria for Transportation Disadvantaged Non-Sponsored Paratransit Service. The next LCB meeting is scheduled for December 2nd, 2020 at 1:30 p.m., at the Collier County Government Center, Building F, Collier County Chambers, 3rd Floor - 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples. 7.E.1.a Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: LCB Chair Report (13750 : Local Coordinating Board Chair Report) 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Cost Feasible Plan (CFP) for planning consistency regarding projects on SR 29 in the FY 2021 - 2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve an amendment to the 2040 LRTP CFP, for planning consistency, regarding projects on SR29 in the FY 2021-2025 TIP. CONSIDERATIONS: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) recently noted a discrepancy between the 2040 LRTP CFP and FDOT-led projects currently programmed in the MPO’s FY2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The discrepancy is due to how the 2040 CFP tables did not show the financial details of the TIP in effect at the time, and revisions made to the Strategic Intermodal System CFP in 2018 that should have triggered amendments to the LRTP. This amendment includes adding projects on SR 29 to the CFP and addressing two new planning factors required by Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) Act enacted in 2012 and the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) enacted in 2015. The proposed changes are included in the 2040 LRTP Amendment Report (Attachment 1). A virtual public meeting was held on September 30, 2020. No comments were received. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Technical and Citizens Advisory Committees voted to endorse the amendment at their meetings on September 28, 2020. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the amendment to the 2040 LRTP CFP for planning consistency regarding projects on SR29 in the FY 2021-2025 TIP. Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (PDF) 8.A Packet Pg. 167 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 8.A Doc ID: 13760 Item Summary: Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Cost Feasible Plan (CFP) for planning consistency regarding projects on SR 29 in the FY 2021 – 2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 12:32 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 12:32 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 1:25 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 2:35 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 8.A Packet Pg. 168 DRAFT AMENDMENT #4 TO THE 2040 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) Purpose The purpose of this amendment is to achieve planning consistency between the FY2020/21- 2024/25 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan (CFP) with regard to FDOT-led projects on SR 29. Cost Feasible Plan •See Exhibit 1: Amendment to Table 6-4 Partially Funded Highway Improvements and Table 6-2 Highway Improvements Completed 2026-2030 •See Exhibit 2: Amendment to Appendix C - YOE Detail Costing Summary Additional Planning Factors There are two new Planning Factors which are hereby amended into the 2040 LRTP: 1.Improve the Resiliency and Reliability of the Transportation system and Reduce or Mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation 2. Enhance Travel and Tourism. The MPO’s efforts in addressing these new planning factors are noted in our participation on the Urban Resilience Focus Group for the Web-Based Interactive Decision-Support Tool for Adaptation of Coastal Urban and Natural Ecosystems (ACUNE) in Southwest Florida led by Professor Y. Peter Sheng, University of Florida and Michael Savarese, Florida Gulf Coast University. The project received funding from NOAA to create inundation, salinity distribution, habitat distribution, beach and barrier islands vulnerability and economic impact maps for various climate and sea level rise scenarios integrated into a web-based interactive decision- support tool that enables users to identify areas of high vulnerability. The publication of the interactive mapping tool has been delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our recent update to our Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP), Public Participation Plan updates, and completion of our Local Roads Safety Plan are intended to improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system by ensuring that the planning process continues despite the occurrence of manmade and natural disasters, including flooding, hurricanes and pandemics. Improving safety performance enhances travel time reliability. Enhancing Travel and Tourism is evident in the emphasis placed on conserving natural areas, wetlands and water resources (such as the Everglades) and the area’s beaches which attract millions of visitors annually. Providing multimodal transportation options supports the quality of the visitor experience. System Performance Report See Exhibit 3 – System Performance Report 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) 2040 LRTP AMENDMENT #4 ADD THE FOLLOWING TO TABLE 6-4 HIGHWAY COST FEASIBLE PLAN - Highway Improvements: partially Funded pages 6-15 and 6-16 Additions Are In Red AND TO TABLE 6-2 Highway Improvements Completed 2026-2030 pp 6-7 to 6-8 MAP ID & OR FPN Funding Allocated in LRTP Funding Allocated in LRTP Funding Allocated in LRTP LRTP funding YOE (CST)$ Unfunded Phase Costs Funding Source 2021-2040 2021-2025* 2026-2030** 2031-2040 Improvement Limits From Limits To Total Cost PE ROW CST PE ROW CST PE ROW CST 4175405 SR 29 [includes Immokalee Bypass] CR846 (Airport Rd) N of New Market Rd N $ 6.74 $ 0.06 $ 6.68 ACNP (SIS), DDR 4175404 SR 29 S of Agriculture Way CR 845 (Airport Rd) $ 0.27 $ 0.27 DS, TALT 4175403 SR 29 Sunniland Nursery Rd S of Agriculture Way $ 0.50 $ 0.50 SU, TALT 4175402 SR 29 Oil Well Rd Sunniland Nursery Rd $ 8.33 $ 8.33 ACNP (SIS), DI 43 4178784 SR 29 North of SR 82 Collier/Hendry Line $1.36 $0.05 $1.31 $10.02 ACNP (SIS) 60 4344901 SR 29 I-75 (SR93)Oil Well $20.67 $20.67 *Per MPO FY 2021-2025 TIP & FDOT Work Program **Per CFP FY2028/29 - FY2044/45 SIS (2018 Edition) 2040 LRTP AMENDMENT #4 ADD THE FOLLOWING TO TABLE 6-2 HIGHWAY COST FEASIBLE PLAN - Highway Improvements Completed 2026-2030 pp 6-7 to 6-8 Additions Are In Red MAP ID & OR FPN Funding Allocated in LRTP Funding Allocated in LRTP Funding Allocated in LRTP LRTP funding YOE (CST)$ Unfunded Phase Costs Funding Source 2021-2040 2021-2025* 2026-2030** 2031-2040 Improvement Limits From Limits To Total Cost PE ROW CST PE ROW CST PE ROW CST 4175406 SR 29 N of New Market Rd N SR 82 $ 31.41 $ 0.38 $ 1.09 $ 29.94 $ 29.94 ACNP (SIS), TALT *Per MPO FY 2021-2025 TIP & FDOT Work Program **Per CFP FY2028/29 - FY2044/45 SIS (2018 Edition) Exhibit 1 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Collier MPO 2040 LRTP, Cost Affordable Plan as Previously Amended APPENDIX C DRAFT AMENDMENT 10/9/20 BOARD MEETING, 9/28 CAC/TAC Additions Are in Red Draft Amended 2040 Cost Feasible Plan - Summary of Funded Projects Grouped by Funding Source with Costs Shown in Future Year of Expenditure (YOE) in Millions of Dollars CF# &/or FPN Facility From To # of Existing Lanes Project Length (Miles) Project Type CST PDC 2021-2025 PER FY2020/21- 2024/25 TIP adopted 6/12/20 & FDOT Work Program 2026-2030 SIS 2028/29 to 2044/45 (2018 Edition) 2031-2040 (2040 LRTP) 2017 - 2040 2041- 2050 PE/ENV ROW CST PE ROW CST PE ROW CST Project Totals YOE CST 4175405 SR 29 [includes Immokalee Bypass] CR846 (Airport Rd) N of New Market Rd N 2 add 2 to build 4 lanes [on existing SR29]; and build 2 lanes for new Bypass - New road construction $ 0.06 $ 6.68 $ 6.74 4175406 SR 29 N of New Market Rd N SR 82 2 add 2 to build 4 lanes $ 0.38 $ 1.09 $29.94 $31.41 $29.94 4175404 SR 29 S of Agriculture Way CR 845 (Airport Rd) 2 add 2 to build 4 lanes $ 0.27 $ 0.27 4175403 SR 29 Sunniland Nursery Rd S of Agriculture Way 2 add 2 to build 4 lanes $ 0.50 $ 0.50 4175402 SR 29 Oil Well Rd Sunniland Nursery Rd 2 add 2 to build 4 lanes $ 8.33 $ 8.33 43 4178784 SR 29 North of SR 82 Collier/Hendry Line 2 2.4 2-Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Paved Shoulders (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) $7.8 9 $0.05 $1.31 $10.02 $ 1.36 60 4344901 SR 29 I-75 (SR 93)Oil Well Rd 2 10.2 2-Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Paved Shoulders (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) n/a $20.67 $6.19 $3.63 $30.49 Exhibit 2 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Metropolitan Planning Organization Long-Range Transportation Plan System Performance Report Template Office of Policy Planning Florida Department of Transportation June 2020 COLLIER MPO AMENDMENT #4 2040 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN OCTOBER 9, 2020 Exhibit 3 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) June 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 - PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2 - BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 3 3 - HIGHWAY SAFETY MEASURES (PM1) ..................................................................................... 4 4 - PAVEMENT AND BRIDGE CONDITION MEASURES (PM2) ............................................... 8 5 - SYSTEM PERFORMANCE, FREIGHT, AND CONGESTION MITIGATION & AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MEASURES (PM3) ................................................ 12 6 - TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT MEASURES ...................................................................... 16 7 - TRANSIT SAFETY PERFORMANCE ........................................................................................ 19 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Metropolitan Planning Organization Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report Template 2 June 2020 1 - PURPOSE This document provides language that Florida’s metropolitan planning organizations (MPO) may incorporate in Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) System Performance Reports to meet the federal transportation performance management rules. Updates or amendments to the LRTP must incorporate a System Performance Report that addresses these measures and related information no later than: • May 27, 2018 for Highway Safety measures (PM1); • October 1, 2018 for Transit Asset Management measures; • May 20, 2019 for Pavement and Bridge Condition measures (PM2); • May 20, 2019 for System Performance measures (PM3); and • July 20, 2021 for Transit Safety measures. MPOs may incorporate this template language and adapt it as needed as they update their LRTPs. In most sections, there are two options for the text, to be used by MPOs supporting statewide targets or MPOs establishing their own targets. Areas that require MPO input are highlighted in grey. Input will range from simply adding the MPO name and adoption dates to providing MPO-specific information such as descriptions of strategies and processes. The document is consistent with the Transportation Performance Measures Consensus Planning Document developed jointly by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council. This document outlines the minimum roles of FDOT, the MPOs, and the public transportation providers in the MPO planning areas to ensure consistency to the maximum extent practicable in satisfying the transportation performance management requirements promulgated by the United States Department of Transportation in Title 23 Parts 450, 490, 625, and 673 of the Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR). The document is organized as follows: • Section 2 provides a brief background on transportation performance management; • Section 3 covers the Highway Safety measures (PM1); • Section 4 covers the Pavement and Bridge Condition measures (PM2); • Section 5 covers System Performance measures (PM3); • Section 6 covers Transit Asset Management (TAM) measures; and • Section 7 covers Transit Safety measures. 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) June 2020 3 2 - BACKGROUND Pursuant to the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) Act enacted in 2012 and the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) enacted in 2015, state departments of transportation (DOT) and metropolitan planning organizations (MPO) must apply a transportation performance management approach in carrying out their federally required transportation planning and programming activities. The process requires the establishment and use of a coordinated, performance-based approach to transportation decision-making to support national goals for the federal-aid highway and public transportation programs. On May 27, 2016, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) issued the Statewide and Nonmetropolitan Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation Planning Final Rule (The Planning Rule).1 This rule details how state DOTs and MPOs must implement new MAP-21 and FAST Act transportation planning requirements, including the transportation performance management provisions. In accordance with the Planning Rule, the Collier MPO must include a description of the performance measures and targets that apply to the MPO planning area and a System Performance Report as an element of its Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The System Performance Report evaluates the condition and performance of the transportation system with respect to required performance targets, and reports on progress achieved in meeting the targets in comparison with baseline data and previous reports. For MPOs that elect to develop multiple scenarios, the System Performance Report also must include an analysis of how the preferred scenario has improved the performance of the transportation system and how changes in local policies and investments have impacted the costs necessary to achieve the identified targets.2 There are several milestones related to the required content of the System Performance Report: • In any LRTP adopted on or after May 27, 2018, the System Performance Report must reflect Highway Safety (PM1) measures; • In any LRTP adopted on or after October 1, 2018, the System Performance Report must reflect Transit Asset Management measures; • In any LRTP adopted on or after May 20, 2019, the System Performance Report must reflect Pavement and Bridge Condition (PM2) and System Performance (PM3) measures; and • In any LRTP adopted on or after July 20, 2021, the System Performance Report must reflect Transit Safety measures. The Collier MPO 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan was amended on October 9, 2020 to add the XXXX SIS projects to the Cost Feasible Plan. Per the Planning Rule, the System Performance Report for the Collier MPO is included for the required Highway Safety (PM1), Bridge and Pavement (PM2), System Performance (PM3), Transit Asset Management, and Transit Safety targets adopted by the MPO Board on September 11, 2020. 1 The Final Rule modified the Code of Federal Regulations at 23 CFR Part 450 and 49 CFR Part 613. 2 Guidance from FHWA/FTA for completing the preferred scenario analysis is expected in the future. As of June 2020, no guidance has been issued. 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Metropolitan Planning Organization Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report Template 4 June 2020 3 - HIGHWAY SAFETY MEASURES (PM1) Effective April 14, 2016, the FHWA established five highway safety performance measures 3 to carry out the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). These performance measures are: 1. Number of fatalities; 2. Rate of fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT); 3. Number of serious injuries; 4. Rate of serious injuries per 100 million VMT; and 5. Number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) publishes statewide safety performance targets in the HSIP Annual Report that it transmits to FHWA each year. Current safety targets address calendar year 2020. For the 2020 HSIP annual report, FDOT established statewide at “0” for each performance measure to reflect Florida’s vision of zero deaths. The Collier MPO adopted safety performance targets on November 8, 2019. Table 3.1 indicates the areas in which the MPO is expressly supporting the statewide target developed by FDOT, as well as those areas in which the MPO has adopted a target specific to the MPO planning area. Table 3.1. Highway Safety (PM1) Targets Performance Target Collier MPO agrees to plan and program projects so that they contribute toward the accomplishment of the FDOT safety target of zero Number of fatalities  Rate of fatalities per 100 million VMT  Number of serious injuries  Rate of serious injuries per 100 million VMT  Number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries.  Statewide system conditions for each safety performance measure are included in Table 3.2, along with system conditions in the Collier MPO metropolitan planning area. System conditions reflect baseline performance (2013-2017). The latest safety conditions will be updated annually on a rolling five-year window and reflected 3 23 CFR Part 490, Subpart B 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) June 2020 5 within each subsequent system performance report, to track performance over time in relation to baseline conditions and established targets. Table 3.2. Highway Safety (PM1) Conditions and Performance Performance Measures Florida Statewide Baseline Performance (Five-Year Rolling Average) Calendar Year 2020 Florida Performance Targets 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018 Number of Fatalities 2,688.2 2,825.4 2,972.0 0 Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million VMT 1.33 1.36 1.39 0 Number of Serious Injuries 20,844.2 20,929.2 20,738.4 0 Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million VMT 10.36 10.13 9.77 0 Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Non-Motorized Serious Injuries 3,294.4 3,304.2 3,339.6 0 Baseline Conditions After FDOT set its Safety Performance Measures targets in 2018, both FDOT and the Collier MPO established 2017 Baseline Safety Performance Measures. To evaluate baseline Safety Performance Measures, the most recent five-year rolling average (2013-2017) of crash data and VMT were utilized. Table 3-2 presents the Baseline Safety Performance Measures for Florida and Collier MPO. Table 3.2 – Baseline Safety Performance Measures – 2013-2017 Rolling Five-Year Average Performance Measure Florida Collier MPO Number of Fatalities 2,979.0 36.2 Number of Serious Injuries 20,653.6 186.2 Fatality Rate per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 1.398 1.038 Serious Injury Rate per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 9.732 5.263 Total number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries 3,267.0 39.2 Trends Analysis The process used to develop the MPO’s Long-Range Transportation Plan includes analysis of safety data trends, including the location and factors associated with crashes with emphasis on fatalities and serious 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Metropolitan Planning Organization Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report Template 6 June 2020 injuries. These data are used to help identify regional safety issues and potential safety strategies for the LRTP and TIP. The MPO uses crash data tracking fatalities and serious injuries in Collier County to analyze past trends and identify regional safety issues. Tracking these measures will help to estimate the effectiveness of future MPO transportation investment, as reflected in the TIP. Table 3-3 shows the changes in Safety Performance Measures for Collier MPO from 2009 through 2017. The measures shown in Table 3-3 were calculated by following the same methodology as that used to calculate the baseline conditions. Table 3-3 Safety Performance Measure Trends in Collier County Coordination with Statewide Safety Plans and Processes The Collier MPO recognizes the importance of linking goals, objectives, and investment priorities to established performance objectives, and that this link is critical to the achievement of national transportation goals and statewide and regional performance targets. As such, the Collier MPO 2040 LRTP reflects the goals, objectives, performance measures, and targets as they are available and described in other state and public transportation plans and processes; specifically the Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), the Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and the Florida Transportation Plan (FTP). Performance Measure 2009- 2013 2010- 2014 2011- 2015 2012- 2016 2013- 2017 Number of Fatalities 37.2 37.2 38.8 38.0 36.2 Number of Serious Injuries 184.0 174.0 175.2 177.2 186.2 Fatality Rate per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 1.169 1.160 1.184 1.125 1.038 Serious Injury Rate per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 5.790 5.445 5.388 5.252 5.263 Total number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries 37.2 38.6 37.6 40.0 39.2 1 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08 1.1 1.12 1.14 1.16 1.18 1.2 35 35.5 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 2009-13 2010-14 2011-15 2012-16 2013-17 5-Yr Annual Rolling Average of Fatalities and Fatality Rates 5-Yr Rolling Average Average Annual Fatality Rates 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) June 2020 7 • The 2016 Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is the statewide plan focusing on how to accomplish the vision of eliminating fatalities and reducing serious injuries on all public roads. The SHSP was developed in coordination with Florida’s 27 metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) through Florida’s Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC). The SHSP guides FDOT, MPOs, and other safety partners in addressing safety and defines a framework for implementation activities to be carried out throughout the state. • The FDOT HSIP process provides for a continuous and systematic process that identifies and reviews traffic safety issues around the state to identify locations with potential for improvement. The goal of the HSIP process is to reduce the number of crashes, injuries, and fatalities by eliminating certain predominant types of crashes through the implementation of engineering solutions. • Transportation projects are identified and prioritized with the MPOs and non-metropolitan local governments. Data are analyzed for each potential project, using traffic safety data and traffic demand modeling, among other data. The FDOT Project Development and Environment Manual requires the consideration of safety when preparing a proposed project’s purpose and need, and defines several factors related to safety, including crash modification factor and safety performance factor, as part of the analysis of alternatives. MPOs and local governments consider safety data analysis when determining project priorities. LRTP Safety Priorities The Collier MPO 2040 LRTP increases the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non- motorized users as required. The LRTP aligns with the Florida SHSP and the FDOT HSIP with specific strategies to improve safety performance focused on prioritized safety projects, pedestrian and/or bicycle safety enhancements, and traffic operation improvements to address our goal to reduce fatalities and serious injuries. The LRTP identifies safety needs within the metropolitan planning area and provides funding for targeted safety improvements. The Collier MPO has developed a project selection process that incorporates safety in its Project Selection Criteria (see Appendix B 2040 Needs Assessment with Cost Feasible Plan Selection Criteria) The 2040 LRTP includes a Goal to Increase the Safety of the Transportation System for Users p3-4: “The safety of the users of the transportation system is an important factor in the MPO’s planning and project development process. Although not used as a measurable project selection criteria due to the la ck of a consistent correlation between the primary goal of increasing highway capacity and improving system safety, the need for safety-related improvements is none-the-less addressed by the MPO through a variety of practices, including walkable community studies, its CMS/ITS and pathways implementation programs and by ensuring that bicycle and pedestrian-friendly features are incorporated into new highway and transit projects.” The Collier MPO 2040 LRTP will provide information from the FDOT HSIP annual reports to track the progress made toward the statewide safety performance targets. The MPO will document the progress on any safety performance targets established by the MPO for its planning area. 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Metropolitan Planning Organization Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report Template 8 June 2020 4 - PAVEMENT AND BRIDGE CONDITION MEASURES (PM2) Pavement and Bridge Condition Performance Measures and Targets Overview In January 2017, USDOT published the Pavement and Bridge Condition Performance Measures Final Rule, which is also referred to as the PM2 rule. This rule establishes the following six performance measures: 1. Percent of Interstate pavements in good condition; 2. Percent of Interstate pavements in poor condition; 3. Percent of non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS) pavements in good condition; 4. Percent of non-Interstate NHS pavements in poor condition; 5. Percent of NHS bridges (by deck area) classified as in good condition; and 6. Percent of NHS bridges (by deck area) classified as in poor condition. The four pavement condition measures represent the percentage of lane-miles on the Interstate and non- Interstate NHS that are in good condition or poor condition. The PM2 rule defines NHS pavement types as asphalt, jointed concrete, or continuous concrete. Five metrics are used to assess pavement condition: • International Roughness Index (IRI) - an indicator of roughness; applicable to asphalt, jointed concrete, and continuous concrete pavements; • Cracking percent - percentage of the pavement surface exhibiting cracking; applicable to asphalt, jointed concrete, and continuous concrete pavements; • Rutting - extent of surface depressions; applicable to asphalt pavements only; • Faulting - vertical misalignment of pavement joints; applicable to jointed concrete pavements only; and • Present Serviceability Rating (PSR) – a quality rating applicable only to NHS roads with posted speed limits of less than 40 miles per hour (e.g., toll plazas, border crossings). States may choose to collect and report PSR for applicable segments as an alternative to the other four metrics. For each pavement metric, a threshold is used to establish good, fair, or poor condition. Using these metrics and thresholds, pavement condition is assessed for each 0.1 mile section of the through travel lanes of mainline highways on the Interstate or the non-Interstate NHS. Asphalt pavement is assessed using the IRI, cracking, and rutting metrics, while jointed concrete is assessed using IRI, cracking, and faulting. For these two pavement types, a pavement section is rated good if the rating for all three metrics are good, and poor if the ratings for two or more metrics are poor. Continuous concrete pavement is assessed using the IRI and cracking metrics. For this pavement type, a pavement section is rated good if both metrics are rated good, and poor if both metrics are rated poor. If a state collects and reports PSR for any applicable segments, those segments are rated according to the PSR scale. For all three pavement types, sections that are not good or poor are rated fair. 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) June 2020 9 The good/poor measures are expressed as a percentage and are determined by summing the total lane-miles of good or poor highway segments and dividing by the total lane-miles of all highway segments on the applicable system. Pavement in good condition suggests that no major investment is needed and should be considered for preservation treatment. Pavement in poor condition suggests major reconstruction investment is needed due to either ride quality or a structural deficiency. The bridge condition measures refer to the percentage of bridges by deck area on the NHS that are in good condition or poor condition. The measures assess the condition of four bridge components: deck, superstructure, substructure, and culverts. Each component has a metric rating threshold to establish good, fair, or poor condition. Each bridge on the NHS is evaluated using these ratings. If the lowest rating of the four metrics is greater than or equal to seven, the structure is classified as good. If the lowest rating is less than or equal to four, the structure is classified as poor. If the lowest rating is five or six, it is classified as fair. The bridge measures are expressed as the percent of NHS bridges in good or poor condition. The percent is determined by summing the total deck area of good or poor NHS bridges and dividing by the total deck area of the bridges carrying the NHS. Deck area is computed using structure length and either deck width or approach roadway width. A bridge in good condition suggests that no major investment is needed. A bridge in poor condition is safe to drive on; however, it is nearing a point where substantial reconstruction or replacement is needed. Federal rules require state DOTs and MPOs to coordinate when setting pavement and bridge condition performance targets and monitor progress towards achieving the targets. States must establish: • Four-year statewide targets for the percent of Interstate pavements in good and poor condition; • Two-year and four-year targets for the percent of non-Interstate NHS pavements in good and poor condition; and • Two-year and four-year targets for the percent of NHS bridges (by deck area) in good and poor condition. MPOs must establish four-year targets for all six measures. MPOs can either agree to program projects that will support the statewide targets or establish their own quantifiable targets for the MPO’s planning area. The two-year and four-year targets represent pavement and bridge condition at the end of calendar years 2019 and 2021, respectively. Pavement and Bridge Condition Baseline Performance and Established Targets This System Performance Report discusses the condition and performance of the transportation system for each applicable target as well as the progress achieved by the MPO in meeting targets in comparison with system performance recorded in previous reports. Because the federal performance measures are new, performance of the system for each measure has only recently been collected and targets have only recently been established. Accordingly, this first Collier MPO LRTP System Performance Report highlights performance for the baseline period, which is 2017. FDOT will continue to monitor and report performance on a biennial basis. Future System Performance Reports will discuss progress towards meeting the targets since this initial baseline report. 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Metropolitan Planning Organization Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report Template 10 June 2020 Table 4.1 presents baseline performance for each PM2 measure for the State and for the MPO planning area as well as the two-year and four-year targets established by FDOT for the State. Table 4.1. Pavement and Bridge Condition (PM2) Performance and Targets Performance Measures Statewide (2017 Baseline) Statewide 2019 Actual Statewide 2-year Target (2019) Statewide 4-year Target (2021) Collier MPO 2017 Baseline Collier MPO 2018 Actual Percent of Interstate pavements in good condition 66.0% n/a ≥60% 36.2% 38.1% Percent of Interstate pavements in poor condition 0.1% n/a <5% 0% 0% Percent of non-Interstate NHS pavements in good condition 76.4% ≥40% ≥40% 50.2% 47.1% Percent of non-Interstate NHS pavements in poor condition 3.6% <5% <5% 0% 0% Percent of NHS bridges (by deck area) in good condition 67.7% ≥50% ≥50% 83.58% 82.21% Percent of NHS bridges (by deck area) in poor condition 1.2% <10% <10% 0% 0% FDOT established the statewide PM2 targets on May 18, 2018. In determining its approach to establishing performance targets for the federal pavement and bridge condition performance measures, FDOT considered many factors. FDOT is mandated by Florida Statute 334.046 to preserve the state’s pavement and bridges to specific standards. To adhere to the statutory guidelines, FDOT prioritizes funding allocations to ensure the current transportation system is adequately preserved and maintained before funding is allocated for capacity improvements. These statutory guidelines envelope the statewide federal targets that have been established for pavements and bridges. In addition, MAP-21 requires FDOT to develop a Transportation Asset Management Plan (TAMP) for all NHS pavements and bridges within the state. The TAMP must include investment strategies leading to a program of projects that would make progress toward achievement of the state DOT targets for asset condition and performance of the NHS. FDOT’s TAMP was updated to reflect MAP-21 requirements in 2018 and the final TAMP was approved on June 28, 2019. 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) June 2020 11 Further, the federal pavement condition measures require a new methodology that is a departure from the methods currently used by FDOT and uses different ratings and pavement segment lengths. For bridge condition, the performance is measured in deck area under the federal measure, while the FDOT programs its bridge repair or replacement work on a bridge by bridge basis. As such, the federal measures are not directly comparable to the methods that are most familiar to FDOT. In consideration of these differences, as well as the unfamiliarity associated with the new required processes, FDOT took a conservative approach when setting its initial pavement and bridge condition targets. The Collier MPO agreed to support FDOT’s pavement and bridge condition performance targets on October 12, 2018. By adopting FDOT’s targets, the Collier MPO agrees to plan and program projects that help FDOT achieve these targets. The Collier MPO recognizes the importance of linking goals, objectives, and investment priorities to established performance objectives, and that this link is critical to the achievement of national transportation goals and statewide and regional performance targets. As such, the Collier MPO 2040 LRTP reflects the goals, objectives, performance measures, and targets as they are described in other state and public transportation plans and processes, including the Florida Transportation Plan (FTP) and the Florida Transportation Asset Management Plan. • The FTP is the single overarching statewide plan guiding Florida’s transportation future. It defines the state’s long-range transportation vision, goals, and objectives and establishes the policy framework for the expenditure of state and federal funds flowing through FDOT’s work program. One of the seven goals defined in the FTP is Agile, Resilient, and Quality Infrastructure. • The Florida Transportation Asset Management Plan (TAMP) explains the processes and policies affecting pavement and bridge condition and performance in the state. It presents a strategic and systematic process of operating, maintaining, and improving these assets effectively throughout their life cycle. The Collier MPO 2040 LRTP seeks to address system preservation, identifies infrastructure needs within the metropolitan planning area, and provides funding for targeted improvements. The Collier MPO 2040 LRTP incorporates Goal 7 of the Metropolitan and Statewide Planning Factors as shown on p3-7 and as follows: “Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. The MPO works with FDOT and with its local governments, which are responsible for maintenance and preservation of the transportation system.” On or before October 1, 2020, FDOT will provide FHWA and the Collier MPO a detailed report of pavement and bridge condition performance covering the period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. FDOT and the Collier MPO also will have the opportunity at that time to revisit the four-year PM2 targets. 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Metropolitan Planning Organization Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report Template 12 June 2020 5 - SYSTEM PERFORMANCE, FREIGHT, AND CONGESTION MITIGATION & AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MEASURES (PM3) System Performance/Freight/CMAQ Performance Measures and Targets Overview In January 2017, USDOT published the System Performance/Freight/CMAQ Performance Measures Final Rule to establish measures to assess passenger and freight performance on the Interstate and non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS), and traffic congestion and on-road mobile source emissions in areas that do not meet federal National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The rule, which is referred to as the PM3 rule, requires MPOs to set targets for the following six performance measures: National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) 1. Percent of person-miles on the Interstate system that are reliable, also referred to as Level of Travel Time Reliability (LOTTR); 2. Percent of person-miles on the non-Interstate NHS that are reliable (LOTTR); National Highway Freight Program (NHFP) 3. Truck Travel Time Reliability index (TTTR); Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) 4. Annual hours of peak hour excessive delay per capita (PHED); 5. Percent of non-single occupant vehicle travel (Non-SOV); and 6. Cumulative 2-year and 4-year reduction of on-road mobile source emissions (NOx, VOC, CO, PM10, and PM2.5) for CMAQ funded projects. In Florida, only the two LOTTR performance measures and the TTTR performance measure apply. Because all areas in Florida meet current NAAQS, the last three measures listed measures above pertaining to the CMAQ Program do not currently apply in Florida. LOTTR is defined as the ratio of longer travel times (80th percentile) to a normal travel time (50th percentile) over all applicable roads during four time periods (AM peak, Mid-day, PM peak, and weekends) that cover the hours of 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. each day. The LOTTR ratio is calculated for each roadway segment, essentially comparing the segment with itself. Segments with LOTTR ≥ 1.50 during any of the above time periods are considered unreliable. The two LOTTR measures are expressed as the percent of person-miles traveled on the Interstate or non-Interstate NHS system that are reliable. Person-miles consider the number of people traveling in buses, cars, and trucks over these roadway segments. To obtain person miles traveled, the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for each segment are multiplied by the average vehicle occupancy for each type of vehicle on the roadway. To calculate the percent of person miles traveled that are reliable, the sum of the number of reliable person miles traveled is divide by the sum of total person miles traveled. TTTR is defined as the ratio of longer truck travel times (95th percentile) to a normal travel time (50th percentile) over the Interstate during five time periods (AM peak, Mid-day, PM peak, weekend, and overnight) that cover all hours of the day. TTTR is quantified by taking a weighted average of the maximum TTTR from 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) June 2020 13 the five time periods for each Interstate segment. The maximum TTTR is weighted by segment length, then the sum of the weighted values is divided by the total Interstate length to calculate the Travel Time Reliability Index. The data used to calculate these PM3 measures are provided by FHWA via the National Performance Management Research Data Set (NPMRDS). This dataset contains travel times, segment lengths, and Annual Average Daily Travel (AADT) for Interstate and non-Interstate NHS roads. The PM3 rule requires state DOTs and MPOs to coordinate when establishing performance targets for these measures and to monitor progress towards achieving the targets. FDOT must establish: • Two-year and four-year statewide targets for percent of person-miles on the Interstate system that are reliable; • Four-year targets for the percent of person-miles on the non-Interstate NHS that are reliable 4; and • Two-year and four-year targets for truck travel time reliability MPOs must establish four-year performance targets for all three measures within 180 days of FDOT establishing statewide targets. MPOs establish targets by either agreeing to program projects that will support the statewide targets or setting quantifiable targets for the MPO’s planning area. The two-year and four-year targets represent system performance at the end of calendar years 2019 and 2021, respectively. PM3 Baseline Performance and Established Targets The System Performance Report discusses the condition and performance of the transportation system for each applicable PM3 target as well as the progress achieved by the MPO in meeting targets in comparison with system performance recorded in previous reports. Because the federal performance measures are new, performance of the system for each measure has only recently been collected and targets have only recently been established. Accordingly, this Collier MPO 2040 LRTP System Performance Report highlights performance for the baseline period, which is 2017. FDOT will continue to monitor and report performance on a biennial basis. Future System Performance Reports will discuss progress towards meeting the targets since this initial baseline report. Table 5.1 presents baseline performance for each PM3 measure for the state and for the MPO planning area as well as the two-year and four-year targets established by FDOT for the state 4 Beginning with the second performance period covering January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2025, two-year targets will be required in addition to four-year targets for the percent of person-miles on the non-Interstate NHS that are reliable measure. 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Metropolitan Planning Organization Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report Template 14 June 2020 Table 5.1. System Performance and Freight (PM3) - Performance and Targets Performance Measures Statewide (2017 Baseline) Statewide 2019 Actual Statewide 2-year Target (2019) Statewide 4-year Target (2021) Collier MPO 2017 Baseline Collier MPO 2018 Actual Percent of person- miles on the Interstate system that are reliable 82.2% ≥75.0% ≥70.0% 100% 100% Percent of person- miles on the non- Interstate NHS that are reliable 84.0% n/a ≥50.0% 97% 98% Truck travel time reliability index (TTTR) 1.43 ≤1.75 ≤2.00 1.12 1.15 FDOT established the statewide PM3 targets on May 18, 2018. In setting the statewide targets, FDOT reviewed external and internal factors that may affect reliability, conducted a trend analysis for the performance measures, and developed a sensitivity analysis indicating the level of risk for road segments to become unreliable within the time period for setting targets. One key conclusion from this effort is that there is a lack of availability of extended historical data with which to analyze past trends and a degree of uncertainty about future reliability performance. Accordingly, FDOT took a conservative approach when setting its initial PM3 targets. The Collier MPO agreed to support FDOT’s PM3 targets on October 12, 2018. By adopting FDOT’s targets, the Collier MPO agrees to plan and program projects that help FDOT achieve these targets. The Collier MPO recognizes the importance of linking goals, objectives, and investment priorities to established performance objectives, and that this link is critical to the achievement of national transportation goals and statewide and regional performance targets. As such, the Collier MPO 2040 LRTP reflects the goals, objectives, performance measures, and targets as they are described in other state and public transportation plans and processes, including the Florida Transportation Plan (FTP) and the Florida Freight Mobility and Trade Plan. • The FTP is the single overarching statewide plan guiding Florida’s transportation future. It defines the state’s long-range transportation vision, goals, and objectives and establishes the policy framework for the expenditure of state and federal funds flowing through FDOT’s work program. One of the seven goals of the FTP is Efficient and Reliable Mobility for People and Freight. • The Florida Freight Mobility and Trade Plan presents a comprehensive overview of the conditions of the freight system in the state, identifies key challenges and goals, provides project needs, and identifies funding sources. Truck reliability is specifically called forth in this plan, both as a need as well as a goal. The Collier MPO 2040 LRTP seeks to address system reliability and congestion mitigation through various means, including capacity expansion and operational improvements. The 2040 LRTP incorporates the following Goal: Reduce Roadway Congestion, p3-3 with the following language: 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) June 2020 15 “Congestion, and the delay that accompanies it, is a serious cost to the residents of Collier County. It reduces their ability to access jobs, shopping, recreation and other activities. The Collier 2040 LRTP places a great deal of emphasis on reducing congestion, thereby enhancing the quality of life of County residents. During the ranking of projects., this Goal received a weighting factor of 2. Objective: Reduce the aggregate lane miles with volume to capacity ratio (v/c) exceeding 1.0, based on the 2040 traffic assignment to the existing plus committed (E+C) network. Project Selection Criteria: • Improvement to an existing deficient facility, or improvement to a new or neighboring facility intended to relieve an existing deficient facility with v/c greater than 1.3=5 • Improvement to an existing deficient facility, or improvement to a new of neighboring facility intended to relieve an existing deficient facility with v/c greater than 1.15=3 • Improvement to an existing deficient facility, or improvement to a new of neighboring facility intended to relieve an existing deficient facility with v/c greater than 1.0=1” On or before October 1, 2020, FDOT will provide FHWA and the Collier MPO a detailed report of performance for the PM3 measures covering the period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. FDOT and the Collier MPO also will have the opportunity at that time to revisit the four-year PM3 targets. 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Metropolitan Planning Organization Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report Template 16 June 2020 6 - TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT MEASURES Transit Asset Performance On July 26, 2016, FTA published the final Transit Asset Management rule. This rule applies to all recipients and subrecipients of Federal transit funding that own, operate, or manage public transportation capital assets. The rule defines the term “state of good repair,” requires that public transportation providers develop and implement transit asset management (TAM) plans, and establishes state of good repair standards and performance measures for four asset categories: equipment, rolling stock, infrastructure, and facilities. The rule became effective on October 1, 2018. Table 6.1 below identifies performance measures outlined in the final rule for transit asset management. Table 6.1. FTA TAM Performance Measures Asset Category Performance Measure and Asset Class 1. Equipment Percentage of non-revenue, support-service and maintenance vehicles that have met or exceeded their useful life benchmark 2. Rolling Stock Percentage of revenue vehicles within a particular asset class that have either met or exceeded their useful life benchmark 3. Infrastructure Percentage of track segments with performance restrictions 4. Facilities Percentage of facilities within an asset class rated below condition 3 on the TERM scale For equipment and rolling stock classes, useful life benchmark (ULB) is defined as the expected lifecycle of a capital asset, or the acceptable period of use in service, for a particular transit provider’s operating environment. ULB considers a provider’s unique operating environment such as geography and service frequency. Public transportation agencies are required to establish and report transit asset management targets annually for the following fiscal year. Each public transit provider or its sponsors must share its targets, TAM, and asset condition information with each MPO in which the transit provider’s projects and services are programmed in the MPO’s TIP. MPOs are required to establish initial transit asset management targets within 180 days of the date that public transportation providers establish initial targets. However, MPOs are not required to establish transit asset management targets annually each time the transit provider establishes targets. Instead, subsequent MPO targets must be established when the MPO updates the LRTP. When establishing transit asset management targets, the MPO can either agree to program projects that will support the transit provider targets or establish its own separate regional transit asset management targets for the MPO planning area. In cases where two or more providers operate in an MPO planning area and establish different targets for a given measure, the MPO has the option of coordinating with the providers to establish a single target for the MPO planning area, or establishing a set of targets for the MPO planning area that reflects the differing transit provider targets. 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) June 2020 17 To the maximum extent practicable, transit providers, states, and MPOs must coordinate with each other in the selection of performance targets. The TAM rule defines two tiers of public transportation providers based on size parameters. Tier I providers are those that operate rail service or more than 100 vehicles in all fixed route modes, or more than 100 vehicles in one non-fixed route mode. Tier II providers are those that are a subrecipient of FTA 5311 funds, or an American Indian Tribe, or have 100 or less vehicles across all fixed route modes, or have 100 vehicles or less in one non-fixed route mode. A Tier I provider must establish its own transit asset management targets, as well as report performance and other data to FTA. A Tier II provider has the option to establish its own targets or to participate in a group plan with other Tier II providers whereby targets are established by a plan sponsor, typically a state DOT, for the entire group. A total of 20 transit providers participated in the FDOT Group TAM Plan and continue to coordinate with FDOT on establishing and reporting group targets to FTA through the National Transit Database (NTD) (Table 6.2). The participants in the FDOT Group TAM Plan are comprised of the Section 5311 Rural Program and open-door Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities FDOT subrecipients. The Group TAM Plan was adopted in October 2018 and covers fiscal years 2018-2019 through 2021-2022. Updated targets were submitted to NTD in 2019. Table 6.2. Florida Group TAM Plan Participants District Participating Transit Providers 1 Good Wheels, Inc Central Florida Regional Planning Council DeSoto County Transportation 2 Suwannee Valley Transit Big Bend Transit Baker County Transit Nassau County Transit Ride Solutions Levy County Transit Suwannee River Economic Council 3 Tri-County Community Council Big Bend Transit Gulf County ARC Calhoun Transit Liberty County Transit JTRANS Wakulla Transit 4 No participating providers 5 Sumter Transit Marion Transit 6 Key West Transit 7 No participating providers Collier Area Transit (CAT), a Tier II provider, is the only transit provider within the MPO region. CAT does not participate in the FDOT Group TAM Plan as it has too few busses to meet the criteria. On November 9, 2018, the Collier MPO agreed to support the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) / Collier Area Transit (CAT) transit asset management targets which were adopted on October 23, 2018, thus agreeing to plan and program projects in the TIP that once implemented, are anticipated to make progress toward achieving the transit provider targets. Table 6.3 displays the TAM performance measures targets for CAT and the current conditions within the Collier MPO. 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Metropolitan Planning Organization Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report Template 18 June 2020 The transit asset management targets are based on the condition of existing transit assets and planned investments in equipment, rolling stock, infrastructure, and facilities. The targets reflect the most recent data available on the number, age, and condition of transit assets, and expectations and capital investment plans for improving these assets. Table 6.3 summarizes both existing conditions for the most recent year available, and the targets. Table 6.3. FTA TAM Targets for Collier Area Transit (CAT) Asset Category FDOT and MPO Transit Targets Current Conditions within Collier MPO Met or Exceed Target Equipment 10% have met or exceeded their Useful Like Benchmark (ULB) 0% exceed ULB Yes Rolling Stock 10% have met or exceeded their ULB 50% exceed ULB No Infrastructure n/a n/a n/a Facilities 25% of facilities less than 3.0 on the TERM scale 0% at or above 3.0 TERM Yes 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) June 2020 19 TAM Performance The Collier MPO recognizes the importance of linking goals, objectives, and investment priorities to stated performance objectives, and that establishing this link is critical to the achievement of national transportation goals and statewide and regional performance targets. As such, the LRTP directly reflects the goals, objectives, performance measures, and targets as they are described in other public transportation plans and processes, including the System-wide Transit Needs Assessment beginning on p4-27, which builds upon the Collier County FY 2016-2025 Transit Development Plan (TDP) Major Update, the Collier 2034 LRTP and the 2013 Collier Area Transit Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) as well as public input, regional model ridership projections and transit market assessments. To support progress towards TAM performance targets, transit investment and maintenance funding in the 2040 LRTP Transit Cost Feasible Plan totals approximately $402.5 million (see Table 6-7 p6-32), approximately 34 percent of total LRTP funding. and 100% percent of requested CAT funding for transit preservation. Improving the State of Good Repair (SGR) of capital assets is an overarching goal of this process. 7 - TRANSIT SAFETY PERFORMANCE The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) published a final Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTSAP) rule and related performance measures as authorized by Section 20021 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP– 21). The PTASP rule requires operators of public transportation systems that receive federal financial assistance under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 to develop and implement a PTASP based on a safety management systems approach. Development and implementation of PTSAPs is anticipated to help ensure that public transportation systems are safe nationwide. The rule applies to all operators of public transportation that are a recipient or sub-recipient of FTA Urbanized Area Formula Grant Program funds under 49 U.S.C. Section 5307, or that operate a rail transit system that is subject to FTA’s State Safety Oversight Program. The rule does not apply to certain modes of transit service that are subject to the safety jurisdiction of another Federal agency, including passenger ferry operations that are regulated by the United States Coast Guard, and commuter rail operations that are regulated by the Federal Railroad Administration. Transit Safety Performance Measures The transit agency sets targets in the PTASP based on the safety performance measures established in the National Public Transportation Safety Plan (NPTSP). The required transit safety performance measures are: 1. Total number of reportable fatalities. 2. Rate of reportable fatalities per total vehicle revenue miles by mode. 3. Total number of reportable injuries. 4. Rate of reportable injuries per total vehicle revenue miles by mode. 5. Total number of reportable safety events. 6. Rate of reportable events per total vehicle revenue miles by mode. 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Florida Department of Transportation – Office of Policy Planning Metropolitan Planning Organization Long-Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report Template 20 June 2020 7. System reliability - Mean distance between major mechanical failures by mode. Each provider of public transportation that is subject to the rule must certify it has a PTASP, including transit safety targets for the above measures, in place no later than July 20, 2020. However, on April 22, 2020, FTA issued a Notice of Enforcement Discretion that extends the PTASP deadline to December 31, 2020 due to the extraordinary operational challenges presented by the COVID-19 public health emergency. Once the public transportation provider establishes targets, it must make the targets available to MPOs to aid in the planning process. MPOs have 180 days after receipt of the PTASP targets to establish transit safety targets for the MPO planning area. In addition, the Collier MPO must reflect those targets in any LRTP and TIP updated on or after July 20, 2021. In Florida, each Section 5307 and 5311 transit provider must develop a System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) under Chapter 14-90, Florida Administrative Code. FDOT technical guidance recommends that Florida’s transit agencies revise their existing SSPPs to be compliant with the new FTA PTASP requirements. Transit Provider Coordination with States and MPOs Key considerations for MPOs and transit agencies: • Transit operators are required to review, update, and certify their PTASP annually. • A transit agency must make its safety performance targets available to states and MPOs to aid in the planning process, along with its safety plans. • To the maximum extent practicable, a transit agency must coordinate with states and MPOs in the selection of state and MPO safety performance targets. • MPOs are required to establish initial transit safety targets within 180 days of the date that public transportation providers establish initial targets. MPOs are not required to establish transit safety targets annually each time the transit provider establishes targets. Instead, subsequent MPO targets must be established when the MPO updates the TIP or LRTP. When establishing transit safety targets, the MPO can either agree to program projects that will support the transit provider targets or establish its own regional transit targets for the MPO planning area. In cases where two or more providers operate in an MPO planning area and establish different targets for a given measure, the MPO has the option of coordinating with the providers to establish a single target for the MPO planning area, or establishing a set of targets for the MPO planning area that reflects the differing transit provider targets. • MPOs and states must reference those targets in their long-range transportation plans. States and MPOs must each describe the anticipated effect of their respective transportation improvement programs toward achieving their targets. Over the course of 2020-2021, the Collier MPO will coordinate with public transportation providers in the planning area on the development and establishment of transit safety targets. LRTP amendments or updates after July 20, 2021 will include the required details about transit safety performance data and targets. 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: 2040 LRTP Amendment Report – SR 29 projects (13760 : Approve Amendment to 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program OBJECTIVE: For the Board to review and approve the amendment to the Fiscal Year (FY) 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP). CONSIDERATIONS: The UPWP provides a planning work program that identifies and describes the MPO’s budget for activities, studies and technical support expected to be undertaken in the metropolitan area on behalf of the MPO Board. It also lists the funding source(s) for each planning task and specifies whether the task will be conducted by MPO staff, consultants or county agencies. At the time the UPWP was adopted, the final FY 20/21 FTA 5305(d) allocation was not available. Task 6 has been revised to reflect the final allocation (an increase of $11,802) for the FY 20/21 FTA 5305(d) grant. In addition, this amendment breaks apart the carryforward funding and adds another funding table to show FY 17/18 and FY 18/19 5305(d) funding. Most of this funding has been spent or has been allocated to a study however there is a small amount of funding remaining in “travel” and “office supplies”. Funding was originally allocated for MPO staff and Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement Staff to attend conferences this year, but due to Covid-19 all training has moved to a virtual platform. Both of these grants expire this year so the funding must be reallocated, or it will be lost. Other changes to the UPWP include: • Cover Page - Added Contract G1J00 • FY 19/20 5305(d) funding - Removed $45,000 from consultant services of the Transit Element of the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The MPO was able to fully fund the LRTP with SU funding. This funding was added to assist PTNE with their Comprehensive Operational Analysis. • Revised summary tables T1 and T2 • Added Appendix E - FY 20/21 5305(d) Grant application The revised pages are included in strikethrough/underline format as Attachment 1. The revised pages are provided in clean format as Attachment 2. A summary of changes to the budget is included as Attachment 3. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the amendment to the FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Technical and Citizens Advisory Committees voted to endorse the amendment at their meetings on September 28, 2020. ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (PDF) 9.A Packet Pg. 194 10/09/2020 2. Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (PDF) 3. Amendment 1 Summary of Changes (PDF) 9.A Packet Pg. 195 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 9.A Doc ID: 13751 Item Summary: Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 10:58 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 10:58 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:12 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:15 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 9.A Packet Pg. 196 COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BONITA SPRINGS (NAPLES), FL UZA UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS (FY) 2020/21-2021/22 July 1, 2020-June 30, 2022 This document was approved and adopted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization on May 8, 2020 _________________________________________ Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, MPO Chair 2885 Horseshoe Drive S. Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-5814 Fax: (239) 252-5815 Collier.mpo@colliercountyfl.gov http://www.colliermpo.com Federal Planning Fund Federal Aid Program (FAP) - # 0313-058-M Financial Management (FM) - # 439314-3-14-01 & 439314-3-14-02 FDOT Contract # Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5305(d) Funds Financial Management (FM) - # 410113 1 14 Contract # GO581 Contract # G1619 Contract #G1J00 Prepared by the staff and the participating agencies of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. The preparation of this document has been financed in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration (CFDA Number 20.205), the Federal Transit Administration (CFDA Number 20.505), the U.S. Department of Transportation, under the Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f) of title 23, U.S. Code, and from Local funding provided by Collier County, the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island, and the City of Everglades City. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Amendment 1 - 10/9/20 Style Definition: TOC 1: Tab stops: 0.76", Left 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS COST ANALYSIS CERTIFICATION .............................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 5 DEFINITION OF THE UPWP ............................................................................................................................... 5 OVERVIEW AND STATUS OF CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES......................................................................... 5 CURRENT LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANNING PRIORITIES ................................................................................ 7 AIR QUALITY PLANNING ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................. 7 SOFT MATCH ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS ...................................................................................................................... 8 FEDERAL AND STATE PLANNING EMPHASIS AREAS ......................................................................................... 8 ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................... 12 IDENTIFICATION OF MPO PARTICIPANTS ....................................................................................................... 12 OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES AND BYLAWS ................................................................................................... 13 EXECUTED AGREEMENTS ................................................................................................................................ 14 CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES ............................................................................................................... 14 STATE/FEDERAL PLANNING EMPHASIS AREA MATRIX ................................................................................... 14 TASK 1 ADMINISTRATION ..................................................................................................... 17 TASK 2 DATA COLLECTION / DEVELOPMENT ................................................................. 21 TASK 3 TIP MONITORING AND DEVELOPMENT .............................................................. 24 TASK 4 LONG RANGE PLANNING ......................................................................................... 26 TASK 5 SPECIAL PROJECTS AND SYSTEMS PLANNING ................................................. 29 TASK 6 TRANSIT AND TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED PLANNING ............... 32 TASK 7 REGIONAL COORDINATION ................................................................................... 37 TASK 8 LOCALLY FUNDED ACTIVITIES ............................................................................. 40 SUMMARY TABLES ........................................................................................................................ 42 TABLE 1 – FY 2020/21 AGENCY PARTICIPATION ............................................................................................. 43 TABLE 2 – FY 2020/21 FUNDING SOURCE ...................................................................................................... 44 TABLE 3 – FY 2021/22 AGENCY PARTICIPATION ............................................................................................. 45 TABLE 4 – FY 2021/22 FUNDING SOURCE ...................................................................................................... 46 TABLE 5 – PLANNING FACTOR AND PEA MATRIX ........................................................................................... 47 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 3 APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................... 48 APPENDIX A – COMMONLY USED ACRONYMS ............................................................................................... 49 APPENDIX B – PLANNING STUDIES IN THE MPO AREA ................................................................................... 52 APPENDIX C – STATEMENTS AND ASSURANCES ............................................................................................ 53 APPENDIX D – RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ..................................................................................................... 60 APPENDIX E – FTA GRANT APPLICATION ........................................................................................................ 67 Deleted: COST ANALYSIS CERTIFICATION 4¶ INTRODUCTION 5¶ DEFINITION OF THE UPWP 5¶ OVERVIEW AND STATUS OF CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES 5¶ CURRENT LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANNING PRIORITIES 7¶ AIR QUALITY PLANNING ACTIVITIES 7¶ SOFT MATCH 7¶ PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS 8¶ FEDERAL AND STATE PLANNING EMPHASIS AREAS 8¶ ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT 12¶ IDENTIFICATION OF MPO PARTICIPANTS 12¶ OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES AND BYLAWS 13¶ EXECUTED AGREEMENTS 14¶ CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES 14¶ STATE/FEDERAL PLANNING EMPHASIS AREA MATRIX 14¶ TASK 1 ADMINISTRATION 17¶ TASK 2 DATA COLLECTION / DEVELOPMENT 21¶ TASK 3 TIP MONITORING AND DEVELOPMENT 24¶ TASK 4 LONG RANGE PLANNING 26¶ TASK 5 SPECIAL PROJECTS AND SYSTEMS PLANNING 29¶ TASK 6 TRANSIT AND TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED PLANNING 32¶ TASK 7 REGIONAL COORDINATION 36¶ TASK 8 LOCALLY FUNDED ACTIVITIES 39¶ SUMMARY TABLES 41¶ TABLE 1 – FY 2020/21 AGENCY PARTICIPATION 43¶ TABLE 2 – FY 2020/21 FUNDING SOURCE 44¶ TABLE 3 – FY 2021/22 AGENCY PARTICIPATION 45¶ TABLE 4 – FY 2021/22 FUNDING SOURCE 46¶ TABLE 5 – PLANNING FACTOR AND PEA MATRIX 47¶ APPENDICES 48¶ APPENDIX A – COMMONLY USED ACRONYMS 49¶ APPENDIX B – PLANNING STUDIES IN THE MPO AREA 52¶ APPENDIX C – STATEMENTS AND ASSURANCES 53¶ APPENDIX D – RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 59¶ 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 32 TASK 6 TRANSIT AND TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED PLANNING PURPOSE: To provide the necessary resources to support a multimodal transportation system in the Collier MPO area. This task includes completing the Transit Development Plan, the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan, a multimodal TIP and other plans, programs and technical studies relating to public transportation. This task includes coordination with the transit agency for the establishment of transit asset management target measures and target setting for the required Public Transit Safety Agency Plan. In addition, this task includes overseeing and providing planning services for a coordinated Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Program in Collier County, in accordance with Chapter 427 of the Florida Statutes (FS) and Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Rule 41-2. PREVIOUS WORK • TDP Major Update – Carryover from last UPWP • Park and Ride Study – Carryover from last UPWP • Transit Impact Analysis – Carryover from last UPWP • Coordinated with PTNE to review and adopt the Transit Asset Management Performance Measures for the Collier Metropolitan Area. • Ongoing transit and transportation disadvantaged coordination between the Collier MPO and PTNE. • Staff support to the Local Coordinating Board as required by the TD Planning Grant. REQUIRED TASKS: Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date Conduct and maintain the operations of the MPO including providing administrative support activities such as financial management, contract management, public outreach, personnel matters, procurement of equipment and supplies and general management of Transit Planning at the system level within the MPO. Office supplies; reports Documented on progress reports Ongoing MPO staff, Board, and PTNE staff will participate in meetings, trainings, workshops, or seminars related to fixed route which may include fixed routes, ADA or paratransit service. Enhanced knowledge of MPO and PTNE staff understanding of best practices; Completed Travel Forms, Receipts, Progress Reports As needed Project Management and Consultant Services to complete the Transit Development Plan Major Update. This is Transit Development Plan submitted to FDOT September 2020 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 33 Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date a carryover from the previous fiscal year. Provide comments on the annual reports of the Transit Development Plan prepared by PTNE Comments on Annual Report June - Annually Coordinate with PTNE on compliance with all Federal requirements to address transit performance measures including, Transit Asset Management and Public Transit Agency Safety Plan Updated documents with performance measures included as required As directed by FDOT Prepare and submit Section 5305(d) grant application. Prepare quarterly progress reports and invoices. Completed and submitted application Completed Progress Report and invoice Annually Quarterly Consultant and staff activities for a Park and Ride study. This is carryover from the previous fiscal year. Park and Ride Study October 2020 Consultant activities for the 2045 LRTP. Coordinate TDP and Park and Ride study with 2045 LRTP. Elements of both documents will be included in the LRTP Multi-modal LRTP December 2020 Consultant and staff services to complete the transit impact analysis. This is a carryover from the previous fiscal year. Completed study December 2020 Consultant and staff services to conduct a study identified as a result of the TDP major update (still to be determined) Completed study June 2022 Consultant services to complete a Comprehensive Operational Analysis. This is a PTNE study funded with 5307 funding and is shown for illustrative purposes. Completed study January 2021 Staff support to the LCB, including preparation of agendas, preparation of meeting materials including legal advertisements of meetings. Quarterly Ongoing Complete TD activities as required by TD Planning Grant, including annual updates to TDSP, CTC Evaluation, annual review of bylaws, completion of LCB training, public workshop, etc. TDSP Annual Report CTC Evaluation Bylaw Update Public Workshop LCB Board Training June - Annual June - Annual May - Annual March - Annual March -Annual Staff attendance at TD training and workshops as required by the TD planning grant Sign in sheets, agendas, travel forms As needed RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO, Collier County PTNE, Consultant Services 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 34 Task 6 - Financial Tables This is not new funding. This table is shown to allow an amendment for the remaining FTA 5305(d) FY 17/18 and FY18/19 funding. Most of the funding for this grant period has already been spent. All carryforward funding (FY 17/18, 18/19 and 19/20) will be summarized and shown in one column in the summary tables. Deleted: ¶... 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 35 Task 6 – Transit & TD Planning Estimated Budget Detail for FY 20/21 Budget Category & Description FTA 5305 FY 19/20 FTA State Match FY 19/20 FTA Local Match FY 19/20 FTA 5307 FFY 19 FTA 5305 FY 20/21 FTA State Match FY 20/21 FTA Local Match FY 20/21 Trans. Disad. Total A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $23,264 $2,908 $2,908 $0 $58,924 $7,366 $7,367 $21,156 $123,893 Subtotal: $23,264 $2,908 $2,908 $0 $58,924 $7,366 $7,367 $21,156 $123,893 B. Consultant Services TDP Major Update $52,501 $6,562 $6,562 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,625 Transit Study – TBD after TDP Completion $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,984 $7,372 $7,372 $0 $73,728 Comprehensive Operational Analysis $36,000 $4,500 $4,500 $93,559 $0 $0 $0 $0 $138,559 Subtotal: $88,501 $11,062 $11,062 $93,559 $58,984 $7,372 $7,372 $0 $277,912 C. Travel MPO Staff and PTNE staff attendance at training and conferences $4,819 $602 $602 $0 $9,600 $1,200 $1,200 $2,000 $20,023 Subtotal: $4,819 $602 $602 $0 $9,600 $1,200 $1,200 $2,000 $20,023 D. Other Direct Expenses Legal Ads $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,760 $2,760 Website $240 $30 $30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300 Fed Ex/ Postage $120 $15 $15 $0 $120 $15 $15 $1,100 $1,400 Office Supplies $1,643 $206 $206 $0 $400 $50 $50 $0 $2,555 Subtotal: $2,003 $251 $251 $0 $520 $65 $65 $3,860 $7,015 Total: $118,587 $14,823 $14,823 $93,559 $128,028 $16,003 $16,004 $27,016 $428,843 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 36 Task 6 – Transit & TD Planning Estimated Budget Detail for FY 21/22 Budget Category & Description FTA 5305 Carry- forward 5305 Carry- forward State Match 5305 Carry- forward Local Match FTA 5305 FTA State Match FTA Local Match Trans. Disad. Total A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $0 $0 $0 $64,000 $8,000 $8,000 $21,156 $101,156 Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $64,000 $8,000 $8,000 $21,156 $101,156 B. Consultant Services Transit Study – TBD after TDP Completion $0 $0 $0 $43,867 $5,483 $5,483 $0 $54,833 Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $43,867 $5,483 $5,483 $0 $54,833 C. Travel MPO Staff and PTNE staff attendance at training and conferences $0 $0 $0 $9,600 $1,200 $1,200 $2,000 $14,000 Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $9,600 $1,200 $1,200 $2,000 $14,000 D. Other Direct Expenses Legal Ads $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,760 $2,760 Website $0 $0 $0 $240 $30 $30 $0 $300 Fed Ex/ Postage $0 $0 $0 $80 $10 $10 $1,100 $1,200 Office Supplies $0 $0 $0 $800 $100 $100 $0 $1,000 Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $1,120 $140 $140 $3,860 $5,260 Total: $0 $0 $0 $118,587 $14,823 $14,823 $27,016 $175,249 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 42 SUMMARY TABLES 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 43 TABLE 1 – FY 2020/21 AGENCY PARTICIPATION Deleted: <object> 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve 44 TABLE 2 – FY 2020/21 FUNDING SOURCE Deleted: <object> 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve 45 TABLE 3 – FY 2021/22 AGENCY PARTICIPATION 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve 46 TABLE 4 – FY 2021/22 FUNDING SOURCE 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve 47 TABLE 5 – PLANNING FACTOR AND PEA MATRIX The Planning Factors listed below are priority themes for the FHWA, the FTA and the FDOT. The matrix identifies which of the Planning Factors and Emphasis Areas that will be considered in each of the UPWP Task activity. Administration Data Collection TIP Maintenance & Development Long Range Planning Special Projects & Systems Planning Transit & Transportation Disadvantaged Planning Regional Coordination Locally Funded Activities 1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency. 2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users. 3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users. 4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight. 5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns. 6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight. 7. Promote efficient system management and operation. 8. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation. 9. Enhance travel and tourism. 10. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. 11. Safety  12. System Connectivity  13. Resilience  14. ACES (Automated/Connected/Electric/Shared-use) Vehicles  Federal Planning Factors FDOT Planning Emphasis Areas 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve 67 APPENDIX E – FTA GRANT APPLICATION 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 68 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 69 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 70 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 71 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 72 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 73 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 74 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 75 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 76 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 77 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 78 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 79 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 80 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP in strikethrough/underline format (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BONITA SPRINGS (NAPLES), FL UZA UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS (FY) 2020/21-2021/22 July 1, 2020-June 30, 2022 This document was approved and adopted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization on May 8, 2020 _________________________________________ Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, MPO Chair 2885 Horseshoe Drive S. Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-5814 Fax: (239) 252-5815 Collier.mpo@colliercountyfl.gov http://www.colliermpo.com Federal Planning Fund Federal Aid Program (FAP) - # 0313-058-M Financial Management (FM) - # 439314-3-14-01 & 439314-3-14-02 FDOT Contract # Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5305(d) Funds Financial Management (FM) - # 410113 1 14 Contract # GO581 Contract # G1619 Contract #G1J00 Prepared by the staff and the participating agencies of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. The preparation of this document has been financed in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration (CFDA Number 20.205), the Federal Transit Administration (CFDA Number 20.505), the U.S. Department of Transportation, under the Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f) of title 23, U.S. Code, and from Local funding provided by Collier County, the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island, and the City of Everglades City. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Amendment 1 - 10/9/20 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS COST ANALYSIS CERTIFICATION .............................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 5 DEFINITION OF THE UPWP ............................................................................................................................... 5 OVERVIEW AND STATUS OF CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES......................................................................... 5 CURRENT LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANNING PRIORITIES ................................................................................ 7 AIR QUALITY PLANNING ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................. 7 SOFT MATCH ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS ...................................................................................................................... 8 FEDERAL AND STATE PLANNING EMPHASIS AREAS ......................................................................................... 8 ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................... 12 IDENTIFICATION OF MPO PARTICIPANTS ....................................................................................................... 12 OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES AND BYLAWS ................................................................................................... 13 EXECUTED AGREEMENTS ................................................................................................................................ 14 CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES ............................................................................................................... 14 STATE/FEDERAL PLANNING EMPHASIS AREA MATRIX ................................................................................... 14 TASK 1 ADMINISTRATION ..................................................................................................... 17 TASK 2 DATA COLLECTION / DEVELOPMENT ................................................................. 21 TASK 3 TIP MONITORING AND DEVELOPMENT .............................................................. 24 TASK 4 LONG RANGE PLANNING ......................................................................................... 26 TASK 5 SPECIAL PROJECTS AND SYSTEMS PLANNING ................................................. 29 TASK 6 TRANSIT AND TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED PLANNING ............... 32 TASK 7 REGIONAL COORDINATION ................................................................................... 37 TASK 8 LOCALLY FUNDED ACTIVITIES ............................................................................. 40 SUMMARY TABLES ........................................................................................................................ 42 TABLE 1 – FY 2020/21 AGENCY PARTICIPATION ............................................................................................. 43 TABLE 2 – FY 2020/21 FUNDING SOURCE ...................................................................................................... 44 TABLE 3 – FY 2021/22 AGENCY PARTICIPATION ............................................................................................. 45 TABLE 4 – FY 2021/22 FUNDING SOURCE ...................................................................................................... 46 TABLE 5 – PLANNING FACTOR AND PEA MATRIX ........................................................................................... 47 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 3 APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................... 48 APPENDIX A – COMMONLY USED ACRONYMS ............................................................................................... 49 APPENDIX B – PLANNING STUDIES IN THE MPO AREA ................................................................................... 52 APPENDIX C – STATEMENTS AND ASSURANCES ............................................................................................ 53 APPENDIX D – RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ..................................................................................................... 60 APPENDIX E – FTA GRANT APPLICATION ........................................................................................................ 67 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 32 TASK 6 TRANSIT AND TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED PLANNING PURPOSE: To provide the necessary resources to support a multimodal transportation system in the Collier MPO area. This task includes completing the Transit Development Plan, the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan, a multimodal TIP and other plans, programs and technical studies relating to public transportation. This task includes coordination with the transit agency for the establishment of transit asset management target measures and target setting for the required Public Transit Safety Agency Plan. In addition, this task includes overseeing and providing planning services for a coordinated Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Program in Collier County, in accordance with Chapter 427 of the Florida Statutes (FS) and Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Rule 41-2. PREVIOUS WORK • TDP Major Update – Carryover from last UPWP • Park and Ride Study – Carryover from last UPWP • Transit Impact Analysis – Carryover from last UPWP • Coordinated with PTNE to review and adopt the Transit Asset Management Performance Measures for the Collier Metropolitan Area. • Ongoing transit and transportation disadvantaged coordination between the Collier MPO and PTNE. • Staff support to the Local Coordinating Board as required by the TD Planning Grant. REQUIRED TASKS: Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date Conduct and maintain the operations of the MPO including providing administrative support activities such as financial management, contract management, public outreach, personnel matters, procurement of equipment and supplies and general management of Transit Planning at the system level within the MPO. Office supplies; reports Documented on progress reports Ongoing MPO staff, Board, and PTNE staff will participate in meetings, trainings, workshops, or seminars related to fixed route which may include fixed routes, ADA or paratransit service. Enhanced knowledge of MPO and PTNE staff understanding of best practices; Completed Travel Forms, Receipts, Progress Reports As needed Project Management and Consultant Services to complete the Transit Development Plan Major Update. This is Transit Development Plan submitted to FDOT September 2020 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 33 Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date a carryover from the previous fiscal year. Provide comments on the annual reports of the Transit Development Plan prepared by PTNE Comments on Annual Report June - Annually Coordinate with PTNE on compliance with all Federal requirements to address transit performance measures including, Transit Asset Management and Public Transit Agency Safety Plan Updated documents with performance measures included as required As directed by FDOT Prepare and submit Section 5305(d) grant application. Prepare quarterly progress reports and invoices. Completed and submitted application Completed Progress Report and invoice Annually Quarterly Consultant and staff activities for a Park and Ride study. This is carryover from the previous fiscal year. Park and Ride Study October 2020 Consultant activities for the 2045 LRTP. Coordinate TDP and Park and Ride study with 2045 LRTP. Elements of both documents will be included in the LRTP Multi-modal LRTP December 2020 Consultant and staff services to complete the transit impact analysis. This is a carryover from the previous fiscal year. Completed study December 2020 Consultant and staff services to conduct a study identified as a result of the TDP major update (still to be determined) Completed study June 2022 Consultant services to complete a Comprehensive Operational Analysis. This is a PTNE study funded with 5307 funding and is shown for illustrative purposes. Completed study January 2021 Staff support to the LCB, including preparation of agendas, preparation of meeting materials including legal advertisements of meetings. Quarterly Ongoing Complete TD activities as required by TD Planning Grant, including annual updates to TDSP, CTC Evaluation, annual review of bylaws, completion of LCB training, public workshop, etc. TDSP Annual Report CTC Evaluation Bylaw Update Public Workshop LCB Board Training June - Annual June - Annual May - Annual March - Annual March -Annual Staff attendance at TD training and workshops as required by the TD planning grant Sign in sheets, agendas, travel forms As needed RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO, Collier County PTNE, Consultant Services 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 34 Task 6 - Financial Tables This is not new funding. This table is shown to allow an amendment for the remaining FTA 5305(d) FY 17/18 and FY18/19 funding. Most of the funding for this grant period has already been spent. All carryforward funding (FY 17/18, 18/19 and 19/20) will be summarized and shown in one column in the summary tables. 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 35 Task 6 – Transit & TD Planning Estimated Budget Detail for FY 20/21 Budget Category & Description FTA 5305 FY 19/20 FTA State Match FY 19/20 FTA Local Match FY 19/20 FTA 5307 FFY 19 FTA 5305 FY 20/21 FTA State Match FY 20/21 FTA Local Match FY 20/21 Trans. Disad. Total A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $23,264 $2,908 $2,908 $0 $58,924 $7,366 $7,367 $21,156 $123,893 Subtotal: $23,264 $2,908 $2,908 $0 $58,924 $7,366 $7,367 $21,156 $123,893 B. Consultant Services TDP Major Update $52,501 $6,562 $6,562 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,625 Transit Study – TBD after TDP Completion $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,984 $7,372 $7,372 $0 $73,728 Comprehensive Operational Analysis $36,000 $4,500 $4,500 $93,559 $0 $0 $0 $0 $138,559 Subtotal: $88,501 $11,062 $11,062 $93,559 $58,984 $7,372 $7,372 $0 $277,912 C. Travel MPO Staff and PTNE staff attendance at training and conferences $4,819 $602 $602 $0 $9,600 $1,200 $1,200 $2,000 $20,023 Subtotal: $4,819 $602 $602 $0 $9,600 $1,200 $1,200 $2,000 $20,023 D. Other Direct Expenses Legal Ads $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,760 $2,760 Website $240 $30 $30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300 Fed Ex/ Postage $120 $15 $15 $0 $120 $15 $15 $1,100 $1,400 Office Supplies $1,643 $206 $206 $0 $400 $50 $50 $0 $2,555 Subtotal: $2,003 $251 $251 $0 $520 $65 $65 $3,860 $7,015 Total: $118,587 $14,823 $14,823 $93,559 $128,028 $16,003 $16,004 $27,016 $428,843 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 36 Task 6 – Transit & TD Planning Estimated Budget Detail for FY 21/22 Budget Category & Description FTA 5305 Carry- forward 5305 Carry- forward State Match 5305 Carry- forward Local Match FTA 5305 FTA State Match FTA Local Match Trans. Disad. Total A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $0 $0 $0 $64,000 $8,000 $8,000 $21,156 $101,156 Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $64,000 $8,000 $8,000 $21,156 $101,156 B. Consultant Services Transit Study – TBD after TDP Completion $0 $0 $0 $43,867 $5,483 $5,483 $0 $54,833 Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $43,867 $5,483 $5,483 $0 $54,833 C. Travel MPO Staff and PTNE staff attendance at training and conferences $0 $0 $0 $9,600 $1,200 $1,200 $2,000 $14,000 Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $9,600 $1,200 $1,200 $2,000 $14,000 D. Other Direct Expenses Legal Ads $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,760 $2,760 Website $0 $0 $0 $240 $30 $30 $0 $300 Fed Ex/ Postage $0 $0 $0 $80 $10 $10 $1,100 $1,200 Office Supplies $0 $0 $0 $800 $100 $100 $0 $1,000 Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $1,120 $140 $140 $3,860 $5,260 Total: $0 $0 $0 $118,587 $14,823 $14,823 $27,016 $175,249 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 42 SUMMARY TABLES 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 43 TABLE 1 – FY 2020/21 AGENCY PARTICIPATION 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 44 TABLE 2 – FY 2020/21 FUNDING SOURCE 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 45 TABLE 3 – FY 2021/22 AGENCY PARTICIPATION 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 46 TABLE 4 – FY 2021/22 FUNDING SOURCE 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 47 TABLE 5 – PLANNING FACTOR AND PEA MATRIX The Planning Factors listed below are priority themes for the FHWA, the FTA and the FDOT. The matrix identifies which of the Planning Factors and Emphasis Areas that will be considered in each of the UPWP Task activity. Administration Data Collection TIP Maintenance & Development Long Range Planning Special Projects & Systems Planning Transit & Transportation Disadvantaged Planning Regional Coordination Locally Funded Activities 1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency. 2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users. 3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users. 4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight. 5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns. 6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight. 7. Promote efficient system management and operation. 8. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation. 9. Enhance travel and tourism. 10. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. 11. Safety  12. System Connectivity  13. Resilience  14. ACES (Automated/Connected/Electric/Shared-use) Vehicles  Federal Planning Factors FDOT Planning Emphasis Areas 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 48 APPENDICES 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 67 APPENDIX E – FTA GRANT APPLICATION 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 68 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 70 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 72 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 74 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 76 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 77 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 78 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 79 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 80 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 81 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 83 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 84 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Clean amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program) 17/18 5305(d)UPWP Amendment 5305(d) Funding After Amendment 93,705$ 4,055$ 97,760$ 41,000$ 41,000$ 4,859$ (2,000)$ 2,859$ -$ -$ -$ 300$ 300$ 150$ -$ 150$ 2,055$ (2,055)$ -$ 142,069$ -$ 142,069$ 18/19 5305(d)UPWP Amendment 5305(d) Funding After Amendment 24,080$ 2,800$ 26,880$ -$ -$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 57,394$ 57,394$ 2,000$ (2,000)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300$ (300)$ -$ 100$ -$ 100$ 1,000$ (500)$ 500$ 144,874$ -$ 144,874$ 19/20 5305(d)UPWP Amendment 5305(d) Funding After Amendment 29,080$ 29,080$ 45,000$ (45,000)$ -$ 65,625$ 65,625$ Consultant Services - Comprehensive Operational Analysis 45,000$ 45,000$ 6,023$ 6,023$ -$ -$ 300$ 300$ 150$ 150$ 2,055$ 2,055$ 148,233$ -$ 148,233$ 20/21 5305(d)UPWP Amendment 5305(d) Funding After Amendment 60,000$ 13,657$ 73,657$ 73,728$ 73,728$ 12,000$ 12,000$ -$ -$ 300$ (300)$ -$ 150$ 150$ 2,055$ (1,555)$ 500$ 148,233$ 11,802$ 160,035$ Website Fed Ex/Postage Office Supplies Subtotal Budget Category and Description MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions Consultant Services - Transit Study TBD Travel Legal Ads Budget Category and Description MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions Consultant Services - Transit Element of the 2045 LRTP Consultant Sercices - TDP Major Update Travel Legal Ads Website Fed Ex/Postage Office Supplies Subtotal Budget Category and Description MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions Consultant Services - Transit Impact Analysis Consultant Services - Park and Ride Study Consultant Sercices - TDP Major Update Travel Legal Ads Website Fed Ex/Postage Office Supplies Subtotal Website Fed Ex/Postage Office Supplies Subtotal MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions Budget Category and Description Consultant Services - Transit Impact Analysis Travel Legal Ads 9.A.3 Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Amendment 1 Summary of Changes (13751 : Approve Amendment to FY 20/21-21/22 Unified 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approve Draft List of Cost Feasible Projects for the 2045 LRTP for Concurrence to Move Forward for Public Outreach OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve the Draft List of Cost Feasible Projects for the 2045 LRTP for concurrence to move forward for public outreach. CONSIDERATIONS: The Draft Cost Feasible Plan List of Projects (Attachment 1) reflects the alternative roadway network modeling analysis completed over the summer, updated and refined revenue projections and staging project phases in 5-year increments. The Draft Cost Feasible Plan Road Network is shown in Attachment 2. Staff is requesting the Board’s concurrence to move the list forward in order to broaden the public outreach, beginning with a virtual public meeting to be held on October 14, 2020 from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. Proposed additions to the previous network alternatives reviewed by the public and advisory committees over the summer include two that are funded through Construction (CTS): • New I-75 interchange in the vicinity of Everglades Blvd. This project remains under discussion with FDOT at this time. Staff will report on the status at the Board meeting. • Connector roadway from new I-75 interchange to Golden Gate Blvd and continuing on to Vanderbilt Beach Rd (2 segments) The majority of the projects added to the list are only partially funded. The phases are Preliminary Engineering (PE), Right of Way (ROW) or partially funded for Construction (CST): • Benfield Road (The Lords Way to City Gate Blvd N) - CST partially funded • Big Cypress Parkway (Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension to Oil Well Road) - PE and ROW • Little League Road Extension (SR 82 to Westclox) - PE and ROW • Randall Blvd Intersection (flyover) at Immokalee Rd - interim improvements are funded for CST, PE phase only for long term solution • Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext (Everglades Blvd to Big Cypress Pkwy) - PE and ROW • Immokalee Rd (43rd Ave/ Shady Hollow Blvd E to North of 47th Ave NE - PE and ROW • Rural Village Blvd (Immokalee Rd to Immokalee Rd) - PE and ROW • Vanderbilt Beach Road Intersection at Livingston Rd - PE • SR 84/ Davis Blvd (Airport Pulling Rd to Santa Barbara Blvd - CST partially funded • Immokalee Rd intersection at Wilson Blvd - PE • US 41 intersection at Vanderbilt Beach Rd - PE • US 41 intersection at Pine Ridge Rd - PE • US 41 intersection at Golden Gate Parkway - PE In August, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) notified MPOs that work on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) 2045 CFP has been temporarily halted due to COVID-19’s impact on revenue projections. The MPO’s CFP has been revised to reflect the 2019 show the version of the 2045 SIS CFP that was adopted in 2018. The revisions show that only two (2) projects on SR 29 are funded through construction: • SR 29 from Agriculture Way to CR 846 E (Immokalee Rd) 9.B Packet Pg. 254 10/09/2020 • SR 29/New Market Rd W - New road from Immokalee Rd (CR 846) to New Market Rd N (this road segment is commonly referred to as the Immokalee Bypass) COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The TAC and CAC met on September 28, 2020. Both committees voted to approve the Draft list of Cost Feasible Projects to move forward for public outreach. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the Draft Cost Feasible List of Projects and Roadway Network map for the 2045 LRTP for concurrence to move forward for public outreach. Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Draft Cost Feasible Plan List of Projects (PDF) 2. CFP Network Map (PDF) 9.B Packet Pg. 255 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 9.B Doc ID: 13762 Item Summary: Approve Draft List of Cost Feasible Projects for the 2045 LRTP for Concurrence to Move Forward for Public Outreach Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 12:41 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 12:41 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 1:30 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 2:30 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 9.B Packet Pg. 256 PRE‐ENG ROW CST PRE‐ENG ROW CST PRE‐ENG ROW CST PRE‐ENG ROW CSTPLAN PERIOD 2 CONSTRUCTION FUNDED PROJECTS12 Everglades Boulevard  Vanderbilt Bch Rd Ext Randall BlvdWiden from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐Lanes   $32.80$5.59 $2.38 $35.31$43.27 County37 Oil Well Road / CR 858[60144] Everglades Blvd Oil Well Grade RdWiden from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐Lanes$36.78$1.81$0.91 $0.90 $6.73 $42.11$48.83 County66 Immokalee Rd intersection Livingston RdMajor Intersection Improvement$24.50$26.82$26.82 County78 Golden Gate Parkway (Intersection)Livingston RdMajor Intersection Improvement$24.50$5.63$26.82$32.45County23 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new)Golden Gate PkwyInterchange Improvement  $9.59$0.58$12.24$12.81OA25 I‐75  Immokalee RdInterchange Improvement (DDI proposed)$9.59$0.58$12.24$12.81OA58 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E)Greenway Rd6 L Farm RdWiden from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes$43.13$3.91 $17.84 $33.53$55.27OA111 US 41Immokalee RdIntersection Innovation/Improvements$17.50$3.13$20.12$23.24OAPLAN PERIOD 3 CONSTRUCTION FUNDED PROJECTS36 Logan Boulevard  Pine Ridge RoadVanderbilt Beach RoadWiden from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐Lanes   $22.23$3.40$3.16 $27.47$34.03County42 Randall Boulevard8th St NEEverglades BlvdWiden from 2‐Lanes  to 6‐Lanes   $47.07$7.29$65.04$72.32County90 Pine Ridge Rd Logan BlvdCollier BlvdWiden from 4‐Lanes to 6‐Lanes$21.72$1.99 $3.56$25.00$30.54County39 Old US 41US 41 (SR 45)Lee/Collier County LineWiden from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐Lanes$22.59$3.85 $1.70$30.06$35.61OA57 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersection Goodlette‐Frank RdMajor Intersection Improvement$13.00$0.63 $2.97$15.77$19.37OA59 US 41 Collier BlvdMajor Intersection Improvement$17.25$2.81$23.66$26.47OA60 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E)Immokalee Rd Old US 41Further Study Required$17.25$0.46$2.00$23.66$26.12OAPLAN PERIOD 4 CONSTRUCTION FUNDED PROJECTS11 Everglades Boulevard  Randall BlvdSouth of Oil Well RoadWiden from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐Lanes   $16.42$3.39 $2.22 $24.65$30.26County31 Immokalee Rd (CR 846)SR 29Airpark BlvdWiden from 2‐Lanes  to 4 Lanes $3.90$0.77 $0.55 $5.88$7.20County63 Westclox Street ExtensionLittle League Road West of Carson RoadNew 2‐Lane  Road$3.01$0.51$0.55 $4.45$5.51County65 Wilson BlvdKeane Ave Golden Gate BoulevardNew 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable to 4‐Lanes)$36.15$8.82$6.15 $50.29$65.26County97 Immokalee Road (Intersection)Logan BlvdMajor Intersection Improvement$11.50$2.40$18.55$20.95County99 Vanderbilt Beach Road (Intersection)Logan BlvdMinor Intersection Improvement$11.50$2.12$18.55$20.67County101 Pine Ridge Rd Goodlette‐Frank RdMinor Intersection Improvement$5.75$1.20$9.28$10.48CountyC1 Connector Roadway from I‐75 Interchange (New) Golden Gate BlvdVanderbilt Beach Rd 4‐Lane Connector Roadway from New Interchange (Specific $17.63$0.44$2.80 $1.66$26.34$31.24OAC2 Connector Roadway from I‐75 Interchange (New) I‐75 (SR‐93)Golden Gate Blvd4‐Lane Connector Roadway from New Interchange (Specific $80.59$2.00$13.28 $7.41$120.02$142.70OA22 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new)Vicinity of Everglades BlvdNew Interchange$42.26$3.76$5.30 $8.32$55.65$73.03OAPARTIALLY FUNDED PROJECTS1 Benfield Rd (New) [60129]The Lords WayCity Gate Blvd NNew 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable to 4‐Lanes)$37.31$11.00$0.00$4.00 $7.00$4.00$5.00$18.00$27.00County5Big Cypress ParkwayVanderbilt Beach Road Ext. Oil Well  RoadNew 2‐Lane  Road (Expandable to 4‐Lanes)$37.31$7.70 $4.04$11.74County33 Little League Rd. Ext.SR‐82Westclox St.New 2‐Lane  Road$40.99$8.48 $7.33$15.81County62B Vanderbilt Beach Road ExtEverglades BlvdBig Cypress ParkwayNew 2‐Lane Road (Expandable to 4 Lanes)$41.17$8.38 $16.07$24.46County93 Immokalee Rd43rd Ave/Shady Hollow Blvd ENorth of 47the Ave NEWiden from 2‐Lanes to 4‐Lanes$9.79$2.26 $0.48$2.74County94 Rural Village BlvdImmokalee RdImmokalee RdNew 4‐Lane Road$23.41$5.84 $2.96$8.80County98 Vanderbilt Beach Road (Intersection)Livingston RdMinor Intersection Improvement$21.50$2.40$2.40County41A Randall Blvd Intersection (flyover) [60147] Immokalee RdUltimate Intersection Improvement: Overpass$35.66$9.75$0.95$8.80$9.46$9.46OA55 SR 84 (Davis Blvd)Airport Pulling RdSanta Barbara BlvdWiden from 4‐Lanes  to 6‐Lanes  $40.26$0.94$9.01$30.04$39.99OA74 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) intersectionWilson Blvd Major Intersection Improvement$17.25$6.60$6.60OA102 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersection Vanderbilt Beach RdMajor Intersection Improvement$2.50$4.90$4.90OA103 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersection Pine Ridge RdMajor Intersection Improvement$2.50$4.90$4.90OA104US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersection [44645 Golden Gate PkwyMajor Intersection Improvement$3.50$0.50$0.27 $0.23$4.40$4.40OANotes:$901.36$23.06 $2.13 $4.23 $16.70 $52.75 $32.44 $209.17 $35.78 $25.55 $210.65 $82.08 $40.36 $381.70 $1,070.48PARTIALLY FUNDED FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE‐ENG PRE‐ENG INCLUDES PD&E AND DESIGNPDCPRESENT DAY COSTPRE‐ENG ROW CST PRE‐ENG ROW CST PRE‐ENG ROW CSTNEW MPO Supplemental Planning Funds $0.70$0.80$1.90$3.40SUNEW Bicycle Pedestrian Box Funds$10.42$10.39$20.65 $41.46 SU/TALUNEW Congestion Management/Intelligent Transportation Box Funds$10.42$10.39$20.65 $41.46SUNEW Bridge Box Funds$5.24$5.20$10.36$20.80SUCollier MPO 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Projects FDOT Other Roads Projects and Local Roadway ProjectsDraft 9/21/2020 [in millions $]Map ID FACILITY LIMITS FROM LIMITS TODESCRIPTIONTotal Project Cost(PDC 2019 $)TIP FUNDING 2021‐25 (YOE)PLAN PERIOD 1 (TIP): 2020‐2025PLAN PERIOD 2: 2026‐2030PLAN PERIOD 3:2031‐2035TOTAL COST 2026‐2045 (YOE $ without SIS)FUNDING SOURCE$294.36$271.97$504.14PLAN PERIOD 4:2036‐2045PLAN PERIOD 2: 2026‐2030PLAN PERIOD 3:2031‐2035PLAN PERIOD 4:2036‐2045TOTAL COST 2026‐2045FUNDING SOURCE$541.55$443.20$85.72$337.40Total Costs by Funding Source2026‐2045(YOE $ in millions)CountyOA  (ROW and CST)OA (PRE‐ENG)SIS$0.00$100.00$200.00$300.00$400.00$500.00$600.00$700.00$800.00$900.00PRE‐ENG ROW CST$170.61$98.35$801.52Cost (millions $)PhaseTotal Cost by Phasefor County and OA funded projects 2036‐2045(YOE $ in millions)9.B.1Packet Pg. 257Attachment: Draft Cost Feasible Plan List of Projects (13762 : Approve Draft List of Cost Feasible Projects for the 2045 LRTP) PRE‐ENG ROW CST PRE‐ENG ROW CST PRE‐ENG ROW CST PRE‐ENG ROW CST29 I‐75 (SR‐93) Managed (Toll) Lanes [FPID 4425192] E of Collier Blvd (SR 951) Collier/Lee County Line  New 4‐Lane  Express (Toll) Lanes (10‐lanes)$0.030.0363.25 145.43$208.6748 SR 29 [4344901] I‐75 (SR 93) Oil Well Rd Widen from 2‐Lane  to 4 Lanes  $0.030.034.33$4.3350 SR 29  [4175406] New Market Road North   North of SR‐82Widen from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐Lanes  (with center turn lane)$1.470.38 1.09 29.94$29.9451 SR 29/New Market Rd W ‐ New Road [4175405] Immokalee Rd (CR 846) New Market Rd N  New 4‐Lane  Road $6.740.06$6.68 $5.88$49.91$55.7852 SR 29  [4175404] Agriculture Way CR 846 EWiden from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐Lanes$0.270.27$5.63 $23.32$28.9553 SR 29  (SEGMENT D) [4175403] Sunniland Nursery Rd Agriculture WayWiden from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐Lanes$0.500.5$2.38$2.3854 SR 29  (SEGMENT E) [4175402 Oil Well Rd Sunniland Nursery RdWiden from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐Lanes $8.338.33$4.55$4.5546 SR 29 [4178784]SR 82 Hendry C/LWiden from 2‐Lanes  to 4‐Lanes $1.370.07$1.30$0.0092 SR 82 [4308481] Hendry Co.Line Gator Slough LaneWiden from 2‐Lanes to 4‐Lanes$44.730.07$2.12 $42.54 $2.80$2.80Totals$63.47 $9.74 $11.19 $42.54 $0.00 $5.88 $32.74 $67.58 $12.55 $0.00 $0.00 $145.43 $73.22$337.40PLAN PERIOD 4:2036‐2045TOTAL COST 2026‐2045Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Projects FDOT SIS ProjectsDraft 9/21/2020 [in millions $]Map ID FACILITY [FPID NO.] LIMITS FROM LIMITS TO DESCRIPTION$63.47 $38.62 $80.13 $218.65TIP FUNDING 2021‐25 (YOE)PLAN PERIOD 1 (TIP): 2020‐2025PLAN PERIOD 2: 2026‐2030PLAN PERIOD 3:2031‐2035$0.00$20.00$40.00$60.00$80.00$100.00$120.00$140.00$160.00$180.00PRE‐ENG ROW CST$67.58$163.86$105.97Cost (millions $)PhaseCost by PhaseFDOT SIS PROJECTS 2026‐2045($ IN MILLIONS)9.B.1Packet Pg. 258Attachment: Draft Cost Feasible Plan List of Projects (13762 : Approve Draft List of Cost Feasible Projects for the 2045 LRTP) J^J^J^J^J^FGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFG!!FG!!!!FGFGFGFGFG2045 LRTP Update±0 2.5 5 MilesEvergladesCityMarcoIslandBROWARDMIAMI-DADEPALM BEACHJ^S 1st STWestclox STGopher Ridge RDW Main STAirpor t RD N 1st ST J^FGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFG!!!!FGFGFGFGFGLivingston RDAirport Pulling Rd NTamiami TRL NT am iam i T R L EDavis BLVDImmokalee RDPine Ridge RdDVanderbilt Beach RDGolden Gate PKWYVanderbilt DROld 41Rattlesnake Hammock RDPiper BLVD")Bridge!!Interchange or FlyoverFGMajor Intersection ImprovementFGMinor Intersection ImprovementNumber of Lanes246Other2045 Cost Feasible Plan Network DraftNaplesNaples8468468588588509495129890846846SEEINSETSEE INSETNAPLES INSETIMMOKALEE INSETIntersection or InterchangeProject Number*Roadway Project Number*2361B222325572359576674101596625603929369029655553742315150335448516333503155299036293960890525358111241A62B929394*For Map Identification (MAP ID) numbers andproject descriptions, please refer to Table 1 atwww.colliermpo.org/lrtpCOLLIERCOUNTYMONROEHENDRYLEE9799981011001019595999798103102104104103102100108109110111112114114110111112108109Partially FundedProjects are Noted29GF7878GF9.B.2Packet Pg. 259Attachment: CFP Network Map (13762 : Approve Draft List of Cost Feasible Projects for the 2045 LRTP) 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) OBJECTIVE: For the Board to review and comment on Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP. CONSIDERATIONS: MPO staff and Jacobs will provide an overview of Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP at the Board meeting. The purpose of this preliminary review is to give the Board an opportunity to ask questions and comment on an early version of these chapters of the LRTP when there is ample time to make revisions. Chapter 4 (Needs Plan) and Chapter 6 (Cost Feasible Plan) have particular significance in that they identify investment priorities. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) reviewed Chapters 1, 2 & 3 in August. The two committees reviewed early drafts of Chapters 4 and 5 in August and voted to approve revised versions to both Chapters on September 28, 2020 for moving forward for MPO Board review and additional public input. MPO staff will report any subsequent revisions back to the committees. As noted for a previous agenda item, both committees voted on September 28th to approve the Draft Cost Feasible Plan list of projects for moving forward. MPO staff distributed the draft Chapter 6 to the TAC and CAC on September 29th. Written comments are due on October 7th. MPO staff will report at the MPO Board meeting on any comments that were submitted. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board review and comment on Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP. Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (PDF) 9.C Packet Pg. 260 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 9.C Doc ID: 13752 Item Summary: Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 11:01 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 11:01 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 2:31 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 2:38 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 9.C Packet Pg. 261 JULY 2020 Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Chapter 1 – Introduction Reviewed by CAC/TAC 8/7/209.C.1Packet Pg. 262Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  i  Chapter 1 Introduction Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1‐1 1‐1 What Is the MPO? ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1‐1 1‐2 What is the Long Range Transportation Plan? ......................................................................................................................... 1‐6 1‐3 Federal and State Planning Requirements ............................................................................................................................... 1‐8 Federal ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1‐8 State ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 1‐10 1‐4 Regional Transportation Planning .......................................................................................................................................... 1‐12 Figures Figure 1‐1. Collier MPO Board ................................................................................................................................................................. 1‐1 Figure 1‐2. Collier MPO Jurisdiction ......................................................................................................................................................... 1‐2 Figure 1‐3. Technical Advisory Committee .............................................................................................................................................. 1‐3 Figure 1‐4. Citizens Advisory Committee ................................................................................................................................................. 1‐3 Figure 1‐5. Congestion Management Committee ................................................................................................................................... 1‐4 Figure 1‐6. Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged ........................................................................................ 1‐5 Figure 1‐7. 2045 LRTP Development and Guidance ................................................................................................................................ 1‐7 Figure 1‐8. FAST Act Planning Factors ..................................................................................................................................................... 1‐8 Figure 1‐9. Daily Collier County Work Travel Patterns .......................................................................................................................... 1‐12 Figure 1‐10. Collier MPO Documentation Responsibilities ................................................................................................................... 1‐13 9.C.1Packet Pg. 263Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1‐1 Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 1 Introduction 1‐1 What Is the MPO? The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) was created in 1982 following 23 U.S. Code §134 Metropolitan Transportation Planning federal requirements that each urbanized area with a population exceeding 50,000 establish an MPO. Federal law requires that MPOs be governed by a board composed of local elected officials, governmental transportation representatives for all modes of transportation, and appropriate state officials.  The Collier MPO is governed by a board of nine voting members and one non‐voting advisor from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), as shown on Figure 1‐1. The Collier MPO’s jurisdiction includes Collier County and the cities of Naples, Marco Island, and Everglades City (refer to Figure 1‐2). The MPO uses federal, state, and local funds to carry out a Continuing, Cooperative, and Comprehensive (3‐C) long‐range planning process that establishes a county‐wide vision for the transportation system. The Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) is a central part of achieving this vision.  MPOs are required to develop and update their LRTPs on a 5‐year cycle to ensure that the future transportation system is efficient, fosters mobility and access for people and goods, and enhances the overall quality of life for the community. To carry out its functions, the MPO Board is assisted by several transportation planning committees in addition to its professional staff. These committees consist of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), Congestion Management Committee (CMC), and the Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged (LCB).  Figure 1‐1. Collier MPO Board 9.C.1Packet Pg. 264Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1‐2 Chapter 1 Introduction Technical Advisory Committee: The TAC consists of tech‐nically qualified representatives of agencies within the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Area. TAC members are responsible for planning, maintaining, operating, developing, and improving the transportation system throughout the Collier County area. They review transportation plans and programs from a technical perspective. There are 13 voting members and one non‐voting member (refer to Figure 1‐3).  Figure 1‐2. Collier MPO JurisdictionSource: Collier MPO Transportation Improvement Plan FY2021‐FY2025 9.C.1Packet Pg. 265Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1‐3 Chapter 1 Introduction Figure 1‐3. Technical Advisory Committee Citizens Advisory Committee: The CAC consists of citizens representing a cross section of the geographic areas and citizens representing disabled and minority populations. They  are recruited to represent the cities of Naples, Marco Island, and Everglades City, and the county commission districts of the unincorporated areas of the County. These individuals make recommendations to the MPO Board from the citizen’s perspective on proposed LRTPs, individual projects, priorities for state and federal funding, and other transportation issues. The CAC has 13 voting members, including four at‐large members (refer to Figure 1‐4).  Figure 1‐4. Citizens Advisory Committee 9.C.1Packet Pg. 266Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1‐4 Chapter 1 Introduction Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee: Formerly known as the Pathways Advisory Committee, the BPAC consists of 12 at‐large voting members who represent a wide cross section of Collier County residents and neighborhoods, bicycle and pedestrian safety professionals, Safe Routes to Schools organizations, transit riders, local bicycle and pedestrian advocacy groups, organizations that encourage active trans‐portation from a community health perspective, and advo‐cates for persons with disabilities and other transportation‐disadvantaged populations. The BPAC provides citizen input into the deliberations on bicycle‐ and pedestrian‐related issues within the community and advises the MPO Board on developing a Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The BPAC is also involved in recommending priorities for bicycle and pedestrian projects and program implementation.  Congestion Management Committee: The CMC serves the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters relating to the MPO’s Congestion Management System (CMS) and the regional Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) architecture. The committee is responsible for creating and amending the Congestion Management Process (CMP) and for prioritizing candidate congestion management projects to be funded with federal and state funding. The CMC has 11 voting members and 15 non‐voting members (refer to Figure 1‐5). All members are appointed by agencies/jurisdictional departments.  Figure 1‐5. Congestion Management Committee 9.C.1Packet Pg. 267Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1‐5 Chapter 1 Introduction Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged: The LCB helps the MPO identify local service needs and provide information, advice, and direction to the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) on the coordination of services to be provided to the transportation disadvantaged pursuant to Chapter 427.0157, Florida Statutes. The LCB includes representatives from various state and local agencies as well as citizen representatives (refer to Figure 1‐6). A member of the MPO Board is appointed to serve as the LCB’s Chairman.  The LCB also reviews the amount and quality of transit service being provided to the County’s transportation‐disadvantaged population. The Collier LCB meets each quarter and holds at least one public hearing a year. The purpose of the hearings is to provide input to the LCB on unmet transportation needs or any other areas relating to local transportation disadvantaged services.  Figure 1‐6. Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged9.C.1Packet Pg. 268Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1‐6 Chapter 1 Introduction 1‐2 What is the Long Range Transportation Plan? The MPO is required to complete an LRTP to receive federal funds. The LRTP must be multi‐modal and should include, at a minimum, highway and transit infrastructure improvements. The Collier MPO LRTP includes highway (incorporating freight) and transit modes, and by reference, non‐motorized modes. The LRTP covers a broad range of issues including environmental impact, economic development, mobility, safety, security, and quality of life. Chapter 2 provides a more detailed examination of federal compliance.  To comply with federal requirements, the LRTP is produced or updated every 5 years and must maintain a minimum time horizon of 20 years. The previous 2040 LRTP update was adopted in December 11, 2015. The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update began in March 2019. As described in Chapter 3, the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP was developed to ensure consistency with all applicable state and federal requirements guiding the LRTP process. The primary purpose of the 2045 LRTP update is to help citizens, businesses, and elected officials collaborate on developing a multimodal  and sustainable transportation system that addresses projected growth over the next 20 years. The 2045 LRTP update serves as an instrument to identify needed improvements to the transportation network and provides a long‐term investment framework that addresses current and future transportation challenges. During the development of the 2045 LRTP, the MPO engaged its standing committees, particularly the TAC and CAC, who reviewed and commented on every aspect of the LRTP. Both committees held a series of monthly meetings through the summer of 2020 to assist the MPO on the Needs and Cost Feasible Plans. The CMC, BPAC, and the LCB also helped to the guide the development of the LRTP by providing their expertise on the development of their committee’s corresponding transportation plans. As shown on Figure 1‐7, the CMC contributed to the Transportation System Performance Report and Action Plan (2020) which addresses  9.C.1Packet Pg. 269Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  1‐7  Chapter 1 Introduction congestion, the BPAC contributed to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (2019) which is incorporated into the bicycle and pedestrian section of the LRTP, and Collier County’s Public Transit Advisory Committee contributed to the Transit Development Plan Major Update (2020) which is incorporated in the transit section of the LRTP. Further, the MPO’s informal Adviser Network (400‐plus members) of community, business, and environmental groups provided essential public input through a series of small group and one‐on‐one interviews. Additional public input was gained by conducting outreach to traditionally underserved  communities, virtual public meetings, and surveys. Due to the COVID‐19 pandemic that occurred during the 2045 LRTP update, traditional meetings planned for the update were switched to virtual platforms.      Figure 1‐7. 2045 LRTP Development and Guidance    9.C.1Packet Pg. 270Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  1‐8  Chapter 1 Introduction 1‐3 Federal and State Planning Requirements Federal  In December 2015, the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act (23 CFR 134) was signed into law and built on the program structure and reforms of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP‐21), which was signed into law in 2012. The FAST Act includes provisions to enhance and support the improved transportation planning factors outlined in MAP‐21. Under the FAST Act, two additional planning factors were added:   improve the resilience and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts on surface transportation   enhance travel and tourism Under the FAST Act, several planning factors are required for long‐range transportation planning as shown on Figure 1‐8.  In addition to the FAST Act planning factors, MAP‐21 included transitioning to a performance‐based program, including establishing national performance goals for federal aid highway programs. The FAST Act continued this overall performance management approach, requiring state DOTs and MPOs to conduct performance‐based planning by tracking performance measures and setting data‐driven targets to improve those measures.  Figure 1‐8. FAST Act Planning Factors  9.C.1Packet Pg. 271Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  1‐9  Chapter 1 Introduction Performance‐based planning ensures the most efficient investment of federal transportation funds by increasing accountability, transparency, and providing for better investment decisions that focus on key outcomes related to the following seven national goals, which include:   Safety ‐ To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads  Infrastructure Condition ‐ To maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state of good repair  Congestion Reduction ‐ To achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National Highway System (NHS)  System Reliability ‐ To improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system  Freight Movement and Economic Vitality ‐ To improve the national freight network, strengthen the ability of rural communities to access national and international trade markets, and support regional economic development  Environmental Sustainability ‐ To enhance the performance of the transportation system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment  Reduced Project Delivery Delays ‐ To reduce project costs, promote jobs and the economy, and expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating project completion through eliminating delays in the project development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies' work practices The FAST Act supplemented the MAP‐21 legislation by establishing timelines for state DOTs and MPOs to comply with the requirements of MAP‐21. State DOTs are required to establish statewide targets and MPOs have the option to support the statewide targets or adopt their own. The Collier MPO has chosen to support the statewide targets. The transition to performance‐based planning is ongoing and has been addressed within the tasks identified in this LRTP. For Collier County to be eligible for federal and state funds, the MPO must adopt and maintain a transportation plan covering at least 20 years (the LRTP), and a 5‐year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which is a fiscally constrained, multi‐modal program of transportation projects within the Collier Metropolitan Planning Area. The TIP is updated each year and includes highway, bridge, bicycle and pedestrian facilities; transit; congestion management; road and bridge maintenance; transportation planning; and transportation‐disadvantaged projects. Both the LRTP and the TIP are required by federal and state law.  The TIP identifies, prioritizes, and allocates funding for transportation projects. Projects in the TIP are included in the existing‐plus‐committed (E+C) component of the MPO’s LRTP. Development of the TIP is a continuous process involving agency staff and public involvement. The adopted TIP and potential TIP project priorities must be consistent with the LRTP. MPOs are governed by federal law (23 USC 134), with regulations included in 23 CFR 450. When MPOs were mandated in 1962, federal laws required metropolitan transportation plans and programs be developed through a 3‐C planning process. The law intended for MPOs to serve as a forum for collaborative transportation decision‐making. Further, planning is to be conducted continually using a 9.C.1Packet Pg. 272Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  1‐10  Chapter 1 Introduction cooperative process with state and local officials and public transportation agencies operating within the MPO’s boundaries. Because the Collier MPO serves a population of more than 200,000, it meets the federal definition of a Transportation Management Area (TMA) and, therefore, must meet additional federal conditions including the establishment of a CMP. The CMP identifies challenges and solutions to reduce congestion and improve traffic flow along arterial roadways. The CMP is also used as a tool to help identify projects in the TIP and LRTP. As stated previously, the Collier MPO CMC is responsible for creating and amending the CMP.  The LRTP must include a financial plan to ensure that reliable and reasonable funding sources are identified to implement the LRTP. The cost of projects listed in the LRTP must balance financially with the revenues from funding sources forecasted to be reasonably available over the duration of the LRTP. Chapter 3 provides a more detailed account of federal and state financial requirements for the LRTP. The Public Participation Plan (PPP), provides a framework to the public involvement process regarding the MPO planning‐related activities. The PPP describes the MPO’s strategies and techniques to inform and engage the public in transportation planning issues to maximize public involvement and effective‐ness. PPPs are living documents that should be updated once every 5 years, preferably prior to the initiation of the development of a new LRTP update. In addition to the PPP, each MPO should develop an LRTP‐specific PPP or Public Involvement Plan (PIP). The PIP builds off of the content and                                                             1 Available from https://www.fdot.gov/docs/default‐source/planning/Policy/metrosupport/Resources/LRTP‐Expectations‐2018.pdf assumptions within the approved PPP but provides additional information, such as specific stakeholders to be engaged during the LRTP development, a summary of proposed engagement activities throughout the LRTP development, and an engagement milestone schedule. A PIP was developed for the 2045 LRTP Update and is further discussed in Chapter 3.  In January 2018, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) issued the Federal Strategies for Implementing Requirements for LRTP Updates for the Florida MPOs1 to the FDOT and the MPOs in Florida. The guidance, commonly referred to as FHWA’s Expectations Letter, outlines the agencies’ expectations for the development of LRTP updates to assist MPOs in meeting the federal planning requirements. In July 2020, FDOT issued a notice that FHWA expected MPOs to also address previous FHWA Expectation Letters from December 4, 2008 (FHWA’s Strategies for Implementing Requirements for LRTP Update for the Florida MPOs) and November 2012 (Federal Strategies for Implementing Requirements for LRTP Update for the Florida MPOs).  The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update’s adherence to the 2018, 2012, and 2008 FHWA’s Expectations Letters is summarized in Appendix A.  State The FDOT Office of Policy Planning develops Planning Emphasis Areas on a 2‐year cycle in coordination with the development of the MPOs’ respective Unified Planning Work Programs (UPWPs). The emphasis areas set planning priorities, 9.C.1Packet Pg. 273Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 1‐11 Chapter 1 Introduction and MPOs are encouraged to address these topics as they develop their planning programs.  The 2020 FDOT Florida Planning Emphasis Areas are:  Safety. MPOs are encouraged to consider how to expandon the level of analysis and reporting required by theperformance measurement process to further study theirunique safety challenges.System Connectivity. MPOs should emphasizeconnectivity within their boundaries to serve the uniqueneeds of their urban and non‐urban jurisdictions beyondtheir boundaries to emphasize continuity on thosefacilities that link their MPO to other metropolitan andnon‐urban areas, and include multi‐modal linkages thatsupport connectivity for people and freight.Resilience. MPOs can address resilience within theirplanning processes by leveraging tools, such as the FHWAResilience and Transportation Planning guide2 and theFDOT Quick Guide: Incorporating Resilience in the MPOLRTP.3 MPOs should consider the additional costsassociated with reducing vulnerability of the existingtransportation infrastructure to help develop a morerealistic and cost‐effective planning document.ACES (Automated/Connected/Electric/Shared‐use)Vehicles. Increased deployment of ACES vehicles withenabling policies and supportive infrastructure may leadto great improvements in safety, transportation choices,and quality of life for Floridians, visitors, and the Floridaeconomy. Though there is a great deal of speculation and2 Available from https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/sustainability/resilience/publications/ratp/index.cfm uncertainty of the potential impacts these technologies will have, MPOs are to determine how best to address the challenges and opportunities presented to them by ACES vehicles. Additionally, with the intent to encourage and promote the safe and efficient management, operation, and development of surface transportation systems, the Florida legislature enacted Section 339.175(6)(b), F.S., which requires the LRTP to provide for consideration of projects and strategies that will:  Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area,especially by enabling global competitiveness,productivity, and efficiencyIncrease the safety and security of the transportationsystem for motorized and non‐motorized usersIncrease the accessibility and mobility options available topeople and for freightProtect and enhance the environment, promote energyconservation, and improve quality of lifeEnhance the integration and connectivity of thetransportation system, across and between modes, forpeople and freightPromote efficient system management and operationEmphasize the preservation of the existing transportationsystem3 Available from http://floridatransportationplan.com/pdf/2020‐01‐29_FDOT%20Resilience%20Quick%20Start%20Guide_FINAL.pdf 9.C.1Packet Pg. 274Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  1‐12  Chapter 1 Introduction In addition to adhering to these requirements, other statutory requirements set forth by the state of Florida regarding the development of a LRTP are presented in Appendix A. 1‐4 Regional Transportation Planning Collier County highways are part of a regional network that not only connects different parts of the County, but also links the County to neighboring counties in the region, to the state, and to the nation. As illustrated on Figure 1‐9, business travel between Collier County and its neighbors is significant, especially between Collier County and Lee County. From 2011 to 2015, the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) analysis of commuting patterns reported approximately 9,400 daily inter‐county auto‐oriented trips between Collier and Lee counties.  Figure 1‐9. Daily Collier County Work Travel Patterns  The Collier MPO provides for the creation of a region‐wide multi‐modal transportation planning process in accordance with federal and state guidelines to ensure the coordination of transportation planning and policy activities in FDOT District One.  The Collier MPO performs the following regional transportation planning activities:   Participates in the Lee County MPO and advisory committee meetings.  Participates and coordinates in the Joint MPO Board and Joint Advisory Committee meetings with Lee County MPO.  Coordinates with FDOT, Lee County MPO, other adjoining MPOs and adjoining jurisdictions, municipalities, or agencies to ensure that regional needs are being addressed and planning activities are consistent. Such coordination includes, but is not limited to, discussion of regional plans, review of the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) plan, evaluation and ranking of Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) projects, and update of joint priorities for regional and statewide funding.  Develops, adopts, and updates regional transportation priorities, including the Regional Transportation Network Priorities (which includes the SIS and other important cross‐county connections and intermodal facilities), the TRIP projects, and Regional Enhancement Priorities.  Participates in the (national) Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO), Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC), FDOT District One Coordinated Urban Transportation Studies (CUTS), FDOT/FHWA quarterly conference calls and regional 9.C.1Packet Pg. 275Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  1‐13  Chapter 1 Introduction quarterly meetings, and Florida’s Heartland Regional Economic Development Initiative (FHREDI) meetings.  Analyzes state and federal laws and regulations for MPOs, committees, and local government officials to aid them in their application of regional transportation policy strategies. Further, as shown on Figure 1‐10, the Collier MPO under state and federal laws is required produce documents that support region‐wide transportation planning which include the LRTP, TIP, UPWP, and PPP. The PPP provides a framework for public involvement in regard to all MPO planning‐related activities.     Figure 1‐10. Collier MPO Documentation Responsibilities  9.C.1Packet Pg. 276Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Chapter 2 – Plan Process JULY 2020 Reviewed by CAC/TAC 8/7/209.C.1Packet Pg. 277Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of   Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  i  Chapter 2 Plan Process Contents Chapter 2 Plan Process ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2‐1 2‐1 Plan Process .............................................................................................................................................................................. 2‐1 2‐2 County Overview ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2‐2 2‐3 Forecasting Growth ................................................................................................................................................................... 2‐5 Base Year (2015) and Forecast Year (2045) Socioeconomic Data ............................................................................................ 2‐5 Travel Model Development Process ......................................................................................................................................... 2‐9 Forecasting Methodology ....................................................................................................................................................... 2‐10 2‐4 Public Participation ................................................................................................................................................................. 2‐11 Table Table 2‐1. 2045 LRTP 2015 and 2045 Socioeconomic Data ..................................................................................................................... 2‐6 Table 2‐2. Public Participation Events ................................................................................................................................................... 2‐12 Figures Figure 2‐1. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Key Process Steps ............................................................................................................................ 2‐1 Figure 2‐2. Plan Process ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2‐2 Figure 2‐3. Collier County Planning Communities, Points of Interest, and Unincorporated Communities ............................................ 2‐3 Figure 2‐4. Dwelling Unit Growth Areas .................................................................................................................................................. 2‐7 Figure 2‐5. Commercial Square Footage Growth Areas .......................................................................................................................... 2‐8 Figure 2‐6. FDOT‐Approved Travel Demand Models ............................................................................................................................... 2‐9  9.C.1Packet Pg. 278Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2‐1 Chapter 2 Plan Process Chapter 2 Plan Process  2‐1 Plan Process This chapter discusses the staged process to develop the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update and describes the plan development activities resulting from public involvement. Goals and Objectives, the Needs Assessment, and the Cost Feasible Plan outlined in this chapter are described in detail in Chapters 3, 4, and 6, respectively. Updating the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP was a technical, collaborative process that included participation by the MPO Board members, virtual public workshops and public surveys, briefings to the various MPO advisory committees (described in Chapter 1), and advisory meetings with the TAC and CAC. As illustrated on Figure 2‐1 and Figure 2‐2, five key steps were involved in the LRTP development process. The MPO Board’s adoption of the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP acknowledged these five steps, with input from the public, the MPO committees, and MPO Board, resulting in a financially constrained plan of transportation improvements.  The five stages of the plan process were built upon past planning efforts, a technical review of forecast socioeconomic growth, the financial outlook of the County, and input from County residents and elected officials.  Figure 2‐1. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Key Process Steps 9.C.1Packet Pg. 279Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2‐2 Chapter 2 Plan Process Figure 2‐2. Plan Process 2‐2 County Overview Collier County is the largest county in Florida by land area. Approximately 67 percent of the County’s land area has a land use designation of Conservation, is owned primarily by the federal and state government, and is restricted from development. According to the Florida Legislature Office of Economic and Demographic Research,1 the County had an estimated population of 376,706 in 2019. Of the 67 total counties in the state, Collier County is the 16th most populous county in Florida with 1.8 percent of the state’s population.  1 http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/population‐demographics/data/index‐floridaproducts.cfm U.S. Census population data show that Collier County population increased by 53 percent between 1990 and 2010. The state of Florida population increased by 31 percent during the same time. Between 2010 and 2019, the Florida Legislature Office of Economic and Demographic Research data show the population in the County further increased by approximately 17 percent, while the state’s population increased by approximately 13 percent.  As shown on Figure 2‐3, three municipalities and 12 planning communities lie within the County.2  2 https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=2749 9.C.1Packet Pg. 280Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2‐3 Chapter 2 Plan Process Figure 2‐3. Collier County Planning Communities, Points of Interest, and Unincorporated Communities Source: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=2749 9.C.1Packet Pg. 281Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  2‐4  Chapter 2 Plan Process With the absence of a designated urban service area or an urban growth boundary, the Collier County Growth Management Plan (CCGMP) includes two primary designations within the Future Land Use Map: Urban and Rural/ Agricultural. All lands within the County geography fall into one of these two categories, which help shape or control the pattern of urban development and land use controls.  Eight of the planning communities have land use designations of Urban as follows:  North Naples  Central Naples  East Naples  South Naples  Golden Gate  Marco  Urban Estates  Immokalee The remaining four are designated as Rural:  Royal Fakapalm  Big Cypress  Rural Estates  Corkscrew While growth is expected to continue in urban planning communities, many of them are approaching build‐out, causing development to spread to rural planning communities. The Urban designation promotes a diversity of urban development and a wide variety of land uses within the designation. The Rural/Agricultural designation does not prevent development, but instead limits the range of land uses within the designation. Pockets of urbanization in the Rural/Agricultural designation are allowed through the development of towns and villages within the Rural Fringe Mixed Used District and the Rural Land Stewardship Area (refer to Figure 2‐3). Most of the County’s future land development is expected within the Rural Fringe Mixed Used District and the Rural Land Stewardship Area.  The Rural Land Stewardship Area makes up almost all of the entire Corkscrew Planning Community, and applies conditions on residential and commercial land uses to preserve impor‐tant environmental resource areas. Within this area are Stewardship Sending Areas that can be approved for preserva‐tion purposes, creating credits that entitle Stewardship Receiving Areas to be developed in the form of towns, villages, hamlets, etc. The credit system is designed to incentivize preservation of the most import environmental lands by awarding higher credit values for high‐value preservation areas. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District are subdistricts of Neutral, Sending, and Receiving Lands. Sending Lands have been identified as having the highest degree of environmental value and sensitivity, and generally include significant wetlands, uplands, and habitat for federal‐ and state‐listed species. Receiving Lands have been identified as being most appropriate for development and are located within the Royal Fakapalm, Rural Estates, and Corkscrew Planning Communities.  9.C.1Packet Pg. 282Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2‐5 Chapter 2 Plan Process 2‐3 Forecasting Growth A major element of the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP development was to determine the travel demand within the MPO boundary. Travel demand estimation is a critical part of long range transportation planning because it helps ensure that the system will meet future needs. By quantifying the extent and locations of anticipated population and employment growth areas, the demand for travel in 2045 can be estimated using regional travel demand models. Travel demand models test various transportation improvements to determine how well they meet future demands, and use base‐year and future‐year socioeconomic data (associated with each LRTP update cycle). For the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update, the base‐ and future‐year socioeconomic data were 2015 and 2045, respectively.  Base Year (2015) and Forecast Year (2045) Socioeconomic Data Travel demand models are driven in part by the interaction of land use activities and socioeconomic characteristics of the transportation network. Socioeconomic data, such as population, households, employment, and schools, that are located in each Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ), are inputs to the travel demand model. A TAZ is a small geographic unit used in travel models to create trip generation rates for all land uses within the TAZ, and thus cumulatively for the entire region. The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update includes 730 TAZs for Collier County, as presented in Appendix B.  A primary source of socioeconomic data for the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP was Collier County’s 2017 Collier Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) data. The CIGM is a population forecasting model that first predicts where and when residential growth will take place in each TAZ, then forecasts where and when supporting land uses, such as employment, shopping, and schools, will be required.  The University of Florida’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) produces Florida’s official state and local population estimates and projections. The BEBR estimates are used for distributing state revenue‐sharing dollars to cities and counties in Florida, and their projections for future years are used in city and county comprehensive plans and in MPO plans. BEBR data are provided geographically at the county and city levels and, therefore, are not available by TAZ.  Base Year (2015) Developing the base‐year socioeconomic data included coordinating and refining the 2017 CIGM population data (produced for each TAZ) to match the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey countywide population estimate for 2015. Other 2015 socioeconomic data came from various sources, including official U.S. Census data and the CIGM, which provided data on jobs, schools, and number of hotel/motel rooms.  9.C.1Packet Pg. 283Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  2‐6  Chapter 2 Plan Process  Forecast Year (2045) The CCGMP requires that the County’s Capital Improvement Plan be based on BEBR data mid‐range (or medium) projection (Policy 4.9, Future Land Use Element). To maintain consistency between the CCGMP and the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP, the socioeconomic data for 2045 were adjusted to match the BEBR medium projection for the year 2045 before being used as the forecast data for the travel model.  Summary of Socioeconomic Data Table 2‐1 summarizes and compares the 2015 and 2045 socioeconomic data. Total residential population is forecasted to increase 43 percent by 2045, with single‐family population increasing approximately 63 percent, and multi‐family popula‐tion increasing 21 percent. The total number of dwelling units is expected to increase 29 percent, with single‐family dwelling units increasing 47 percent and multi‐family dwelling units growing 13 percent.  Figures 2‐4 and 2‐5 present the Dwelling Units Growth and Commercial Square Footage Growth, respectively. The most significant increase in dwelling unit and commercial square footage are primarily located in the following areas:   Rural Land Stewardship Area  Rural Mixed Fringe District  Table 2‐1. 2045 LRTP 2015 and 2045 Socioeconomic Data  2015  2045  Growth Single‐Family Dwelling Units  102,622  151,104  47% Multi‐Family Dwelling Units  115,147  130,655  13% Total Dwelling Units 217,769 281,759 29% Single‐Family Population  184,377  300,152  63% Multi‐Family Population   173,386  210,085  21% Total Residential Population  357,763 510,237 43% Employees (at place of work/employment) 143,044  212,780  49% Workers (at place of residence) 179,594  194,090  8% Hotel/Motel Units  8,817  9,380  6% Total School Enrollment (including colleges) 67,922  75,117  11% Source: http://www.spikowski.com/details/CollierMPOscenarios.html 9.C.1Packet Pg. 284Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2‐7 Chapter 2 Plan Process  Figure 2‐4. Dwelling Unit Growth Areas Source: http://www.spikowski.com/details/CollierMPOscenarios.html 9.C.1Packet Pg. 285Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 2‐8 Chapter 2 Plan Process  Figure 2‐5. Commercial Square Footage Growth Areas Source: http://www.spikowski.com/details/CollierMPOscenarios.html 9.C.1Packet Pg. 286Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  2‐9  Chapter 2 Plan Process Travel Model Development Process FDOT requires regional and local transportation planning agencies to use an FDOT‐approved travel demand model (if available) for their planning area. Travel models simulate responses people make about how to travel, given various possible network configurations and capacities of highways and transit service. Figure 2‐6 presents the approved FDOT travel demand models in Florida. Because Collier County is located within FDOT District One, the FDOT District One Regional Planning Model (D1RPM) was used for the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update.  The D1RPM travel model was validated and calibrated for the base year 2015 using actual traffic counts and transit service for 2015, along with the actual 2015 socioeconomic data for each TAZ. The 2015 socioeconomic data was input to the D1RPM travel model and the resulting traffic assignments were compared to actual traffic counts. After the model was validated to approximate 2015 conditions, the 2045 forecast data that had been distributed to each TAZ were used as inputs to estimate travel demand and potential project performance to meet that demand in 2045. The Collier MPO provided FDOT with the socioeconomic data for 2015 and Figure 2‐6. FDOT‐Approved Travel Demand Models  9.C.1Packet Pg. 287Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  2‐10  Chapter 2 Plan Process 2045 as inputs for the D1RPM model, and FDOT provided all travel model runs during the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update.  Future‐year roadway configurations, or alternative scenario travel networks, were developed by modeling the Existing Plus Committed (E+C) travel network using 2045 socioeconomic data to estimate future deficiencies. The E+C network includes all new road or capacity projects that have been implemented since 2015 (existing), plus all projects that have construction funded in the 2023 FDOT 5‐Year Work Program (committed). Once potential deficiencies were understood, the new projects were identified as alternative network scenarios for input to the model. In addition to advisory meetings with the TAC and CAC, FDOT and Collier MPO staff held several coordination meetings on issues related to the model development process and the use of the model for developing the Needs Plan and the Cost Feasible Plan. Five alternative network scenarios were modeled and evaluated for the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update.  Forecasting Methodology Population estimates and forecasts in travel models count the number of permanent residents in a manner similar to the U.S. Census Bureau. The population input entered into the D1RPM was the “residential population,” or the number of permanent residents in single‐family and multi‐family dwellings (not including seasonal residents and permanent residents living in group quarters, such as nursing homes, dormitories, jails, etc.). Seasonal residents were not included in the population totals; the dwellings they occupy seasonally were tabulated, but identified as “vacant” along with dwellings that were vacant for other reasons (for example, for sale or for rent).  The 2015 American Community Survey of countywide residential population of 357,305 is less than the population from the estimated 2017 CIGM population of 367,516. Therefore, the CIGM population and housing data for 2017 were correlated to 2015 levels.  To forecast 2045 estimates, the CIGM first determines the likely amount of residential, commercial, and industrial development in each TAZ at full build‐out. For the LRTP update, logistic growth curves were adjusted for certain TAZs to simulate a conservative growth rate through 2045, so that the county‐wide residential population would be aligned with the BEBR medium projection for 2045. These growth‐curve adjustments had no effect on the anticipated density and intensity at build‐out of any TAZ based on applicable land use designations. The 2015 employment levels were prepared by FDOT based on data from InfoUSA, a commercial provider. The CIGM employee forecasts for 2045 were the primary basis for socioeconomic data on employment for 2045, as neither InfoUSA nor any source other than the CIGM is able to provide accurate forecasts for small areas, such as TAZs. The CIGM also provided 2045 forecasts for industrial, retail, office, and public school employees. The CIGM school enrollment data consists of the number of students attending a K–12 public school in each TAZ. School enrollment data were supplemented with charter school and private school enrollments from the Collier County School District and the Florida Department of Education, respectively. School enrollment data were further supplemented with the number of students in colleges and universities. The 2045 total school enrollment forecasts were derived similar to the population growth forecasts. 9.C.1Packet Pg. 288Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  2‐11  Chapter 2 Plan Process Additional 2015 data used for the D1RPM included the U.S. Census Bureau data plus data provided directly by county and state agencies, including the number of single‐family dwellings in each TAZ with two or more vehicles and the average household income in each TAZ. Because the U.S. Census does not provide separate data by TAZ, multiple adjoining TAZs were assigned the data from a single larger area, such as a Census block group or Census tract. 2‐4 Public Participation The major steps defined in the public participation process are consistent with the major milestones in the LRTP development process (refer to Figure 2‐1). Public outreach techniques during the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update included public meetings, newsletters, website, social media, surveys, and public service announcements.  Table 2‐2 summarizes the public participation efforts throughout the 2045 LRTP update. The text that follows provides further details on the public participation.  The 2045 LRTP update was kicked off by presenting an overview of the LRTP process and tasks at the MPO Board and TAC/CAC meetings in May 2019. The LRTP update process began with developing the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Public Involvement Plan, which was presented to the TAC/CAC and MPO Board on August 26 and, September 13, 2019, respectively.  The PIP identifies outreach efforts and techniques that give officials, agencies, local government, interested parties, and the public an opportunity to participate in the planning process. The PIP also identifies methods to measure the effectiveness of the outreach.  Additionally, the Goals, Objectives and Decision‐Making Framework White Paper was also presented to the MPO Board and TAC/CAC, which included a presentation of the proposed Vision, Goals, and Objectives, and evaluation criteria of the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update. The TAC/CAC and MPO Board comments were subsequently incorporated into the documents, and the MPO Board endorsed the PIP and the Goals, Objectives and Decision‐Making Framework White Paper during their regularly scheduled meeting on October 11, 2019.  Advisory meetings with the TAC/CAC were established during the early phases of the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update. The advisory meetings provided valuable feedback during the development of the E+C Network alternatives for network scenario planning, Needs Plan development, and the Cost Feasible Plan development. The COVID‐19 pandemic occurred during the 2045 LRTP update, requiring some of the meetings to be moved to a virtual platform.  Public input was an important part of the LRTP development process and helped refine the community’s collective goals and objectives, which in turn helped guide the entire planning process. The first public engagement activity was a Kick‐Off Public Survey, which was posted on the Collier MPO website.  9.C.1Packet Pg. 289Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  2‐12  Chapter 2 Plan Process   Table 2‐2. Public Participation Events Event Details  Group  Date 2045 LRTP Kickoff  ‐ Overview of LRTP Tasks MPO Board  5/10/2020 TAC/CAC  5/20/2020 Presentation of Draft Evaluation Framework White Paper and Draft PIP TAC/CAC  8/26/2019 MPO Board  9/13/2019 Presentation of Updates to the Evaluation Framework White Paper and PIP based on MPO input. Endorsed by MPO Board. MPO Board  10/11/2019 Presentation of E+C Network and basic Socioeconomic Data. Board approved submittal of the E+C Network to FDOT.  TAC/CAC  10/28/2019 MPO Board  11/8/2019 Attended the Ciclovia Immokalee event at the Immokalee Community Park to present the E+C Network and to distribute the LRTP Kick‐off Survey and newsletter.  Members of the Public 11/2/2019 Presentation of the 2045 Socioeconomic Forecast Zonal Data (by Traffic Analysis Zone). TAC/CAC endorsed the zonal data. MPO Board approved submittal of the zonal data to FDOT.  TAC/CAC  11/25/2019 MPO Board  12/13/2019 Presentation of Alternative 1 Network Scenario modeling results and Proposed Alternative 2 Network Scenario. TAC/CAC provided input.  TAC/CAC  5/18/2020 Presentation of Alternative 2 Network Scenario modeling results and Proposed Alternative 3 Cost Feasible Network. TAC/CAC and MPO Board provided input. TAC/CAC  6/10/2020 MPO Board  6/12/2020 Presentation of Alternative 3 Cost Feasible Network modeling results, evaluation criteria scoring, and project rankings. TAC/CAC provided input. TAC/CAC  7/8/2020 Virtual Public Meeting. Presentation of the Draft Project Needs List and overview of the LRTP process. Panel of Collier MPO Staff and Collier County Staff present for the question and answer session.  Members of the Public 7/29/2020 Presentation of Alternative 4 Cost Feasible Network modeling results, proposed Alternative 5 Cost Feasible Network, project costs, revenue forecasts, and the 7/29/2020 virtual public meeting results. TAC/CAC provided input. TAC/CAC  8/7/2020 Presentation of Final Project Needs List, Draft Cost Feasible Plan, revenue forecast, project costs, project rankings, and results of public input. MPO Board provided input.  MPO Board  9/11/2020 Virtual Public Meeting. Presentation of the Final Project Needs List and Draft Cost Feasible Plan. Panel of Collier MPO Staff and Collier County Staff present for the question and answer session.  Members of the Public 9/15/2020 Presentation of the results of public input from the 9/15/2020 Virtual Public Meeting, Draft Cost Feasible Plan, and Draft LRTP. TAC/CAC and MPO Board provided input.  TAC/CAC  10/26/2020 MPO Board  11/13/2020 Presentation of the Final Cost Feasible Plan and Final LRTP. MPO Board approved Final LRTP for adoption.  MPO Board  12/11/2020  9.C.1Packet Pg. 290Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  2‐13  Chapter 2 Plan Process The survey included questions about residence and work locations, primary travel modes around the County, transportation challenges, ideal modes of travel, and safety issues. The initial community outreach occurred November 2, 2019, when Collier MPO representatives attended the Ciclovia Immokalee event. This event was at the Immokalee Community Park and is a free family‐friendly event held monthly to promote healthy habits and physical activities for families. The LRTP Kick‐Off Public Survey and Newsletter were distributed at the event and transportation network maps were displayed. In addition to completing the survey, attendees were invited to the Collier MPO Information Booth to view the E+C network and provide input on existing and future needed transportation projects. A total of 59 paper surveys were completed: 12 in English, 34 in Spanish, and 13 in Creole. Additionally, 36 surveys were completed online.  Attendees at the Ciclovia Immokalee Event on November 2, 2019, Completed Surveys at the Collier MPO Information Booth Results of the survey indicate that the primary modes of transportation used in Collier County are driving (46 percent) and public transit (24 percent). However, given a choice of transportation mode, 27 percent of respondents would prefer to drive, while 39 percent would prefer to use public transit, 17 percent would prefer to bike, 13 percent would prefer to walk, and 4 percent would prefer to ride‐share. The primary reasons for the preferred transportation modes were cost, time savings, and convenience. Respondents noted that the County’s biggest transportation challenges include transit/bus frequency and existing bus stop locations (31 percent) and limited pedestrian mobility (20 percent). Primary safety concerns included distracted drivers (cell phone use), cars not stopping, cars going too fast, and a lack of sidewalks and crosswalks.  Local Residents View Maps at the Ciclovia Immokalee Event on November 2, 2019 9.C.1Packet Pg. 291Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  2‐14  Chapter 2 Plan Process Because of the COVID‐19 pandemic, the public involvement meetings were also moved to a virtual platform. The initial public meeting was held virtually in July 2020 using a GoToMeeting platform. The meeting was advertised through the Collier MPO website and the Collier County Facebook page and was further promoted using a Facebook ad 1 week prior to the event. Virtual display boards for public review included:   LRTP Process and Schedule   LRTP Goals and Objectives  Draft Needs Network  2045 Forecasted Growth  Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan  Proposed Transit Network Additionally, a map of the Draft Project Needs List was presented in a WikiProject Map on the Collier MPO website and made available to the public 1 week prior to the virtual public meeting. The WikiProject Map allowed viewers to select their top five projects from the needs project list and provide comments on the projects, and also included a short survey.  At the start of the virtual public meeting, participants were greeted with a pre‐recorded video presentation. A panel of MPO staff and representatives was available for the question‐and‐answer portion of the virtual meeting. Participants were asked to submit questions prior to the meeting but could also ask questions using the chat option during the meeting. A moderator presented the questions to the panel during the question‐and‐answer portion of the meeting. Meeting participants were asked to complete a comment form after the meeting and to complete the wiki map and survey exercise on the MPO website if they had not already done so. The comment period for the 2045 LRTP Draft Needs Assessment Plan remained open through August 12, 2020. In addition to the public workshops, scheduled project updates were given to the TAC/CAC and the MPO Board. As the process reached the point of plan deliverables, technical memoranda were prepared and submitted to the TAC/CAC and MPO Board for review and comment.  Following the development of this Draft Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update document, and during the formal public comment period, copies of the document were distributed to a variety of publicly accessible locations (for example, public libraries, government center, etc.) and another virtual public meeting was conducted to solicit comments on the draft LRTP document, including the Cost Feasible Plan recommendations. All public written comments received throughout the process were incorporated as part of the Support Documentation, and any comments received during the public comment period were specifically addressed prior to the Collier MPO’s adoption hearing. 9.C.1Packet Pg. 292Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of JULY 2020 Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Chapter 3 – 2045 LRTP Goals  and Objectives Reviewed by TAC/CAC 8/7/209.C.1Packet Pg. 293Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan i Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Contents Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................................................. 3‐1 3‐1 Long Range Vision for Collier County Transportation .............................................................................................................. 3‐1 Federal Planning Factors ........................................................................................................................................................... 3‐1 Statewide and Metropolitan Planning Priorities ...................................................................................................................... 3‐2 3‐2 2045 LRTP Goals ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3‐3 Priorities: Goals, Objectives, and Evaluation Criteria ............................................................................................................... 3‐4 3‐3 Applying Priorities to Decision‐Making ................................................................................................................................... 3‐11 Evaluation Criteria for Project Selection ................................................................................................................................. 3‐11 Table Table 3‐1. 2045 LRTP Evaluation Criteria and Performance Measures ................................................................................................. 3‐12 Figures Figure 3‐1. Federal Planning Factors ....................................................................................................................................................... 3‐1 Figure 3‐2. LRTP Development Framework ............................................................................................................................................. 3‐4 9.C.1Packet Pg. 294Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3‐1 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives 3‐1 Long Range Vision for Collier County Transportation The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP development process began early in 2019 by establishing the plan’s vision statement, goals, and objectives. The goals and objectives help guide the LRTP process to meet the Collier MPO’s vision, while considering federal, state, and regional priorities. The LRTP goals and objectives refine the Collier MPO’s vision and are a critical part of the planning process because the project needs are established based on these goals and objectives.   Federal Planning Factors This 2045 LRTP Update addresses federal mandates for regional transportation planning. As noted in Chapter 1, the guidance, commonly referred to as FHWA’s Expectations Letter, outlines the agency’s expectations for the development of LRTP updates to help MPOs meet the federal planning requirements. Based on the FAST Act provisions, the FHWA Expectations Letter notes that MPOs are now required to address the following new planning factors:  Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportationsystem, and reduce or mitigate storm water impacts ofsurface transportationEnhance travel and tourismIncluding these two new planning factors, the FAST Act requires 10 planning factors for long‐range transportation planning (detailed in Chapter 1‐3). Figure 3‐1 illustrates the federal planning factors.  Figure 3‐1. Federal Planning Factors Source: FDOT MPO Program Management Handbook, Rev. July 2019 “The Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan envisions the development of an integrated multimodal transportation system to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people and goods while addressing current and future transportation demand, environmental sustainability, and community character.” Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Vision Statement 9.C.1Packet Pg. 295Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  3‐2  Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Statewide and Metropolitan Planning Priorities Florida statutes require that LRTPs include projects and strategies that will serve all modes of transportation and benefit the region as follows:   Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency  Increase the safety and security of th`e transportation system for motorized and non‐motorized users  Increase accessibility and mobility options available to people and for freight  Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, and improve quality of life  Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight  Promote efficient system management and operation  Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system The LRTP should emphasize coordination with local juris‐ dictions (cities of Naples, Marco Island, and Everglades City) and consistency with future land use planning and locally adopted comprehensive plans of those entities and should consider a 20‐year planning horizon. The LRTP should strive for integrated land use and transportation planning that fosters sustainable development and reduces greenhouse gas emissions.                                                             1 https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your‐government/divisions‐a‐e/comprehensive‐planning/growth‐management‐plan‐current Collier County Growth Management Plan  The Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan1 (the County’s comprehensive plan) was adopted in 1997 and amended in November 2019. The plan’s core principles of growth include:   Protect natural resource systems and guide development away from areas of greatest sensitivity  Coordinate land use and public facilities to develop within Urban Designated Areas   Manage coastal development  Provide adequate and affordable housing  Attain high‐quality urban design  Improve efficiency and effectiveness in the land use regulatory system  Protect private property rights Collier County Community Housing Plan  The Collier County Community Housing Plan2 has the central goal of a diverse range of attainable and affordable housing for all residents. Specific transportation recommendations from this plan include:   Integrate bus routes with affordable housing locations: identify corridors for multi‐family development, imple‐ment park‐and‐ride systems, and explore bus rapid transit (BRT) and express service lines 2 https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=7493 9.C.1Packet Pg. 296Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3‐3 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Enhance bike lane and pedestrian systems: implementComprehensive Pathways Plan; enhance safety forvulnerable usersRide‐sharing options for enhanced mobility: create aride‐sharing optionRevenue for transit and alternative mobility: establishsustainable and secure revenue streams; implement arecurring revenue source; establish uniform standards todetermine the impacts on transit from new development3‐2 2045 LRTP Goals  The advisory committees endorsed, and the MPO Board approved in October 2019, a White Paper entitled Goals, Objectives and Decision‐Making Framework for the 2045 LRTP (refer to Appendix C). The following material is consistent with that document. The 2045 LRTP Goals include:  Goal #1: Ensure the Security of Transportation System forUsersGoal #2: Protect Environmental ResourcesGoal #3: Improve System Continuity and ConnectivityGoal #4: Reduce Roadway CongestionGoal #5: Promote Freight MovementGoal #6: Increase the Safety of the Transportation Systemfor Users3 https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default‐source/planning/policy/metrosupport/resources/fdot_mpoguidebook_20181005.pdf?sfvrsn=7d194ed6_2Goal #7: Promote Multimodal SolutionsGoal #8: Promote the Integrated Planning ofTransportation and Land UseGoal #9: Promote Sustainability in the Planning ofTransportation and Land UseGoal #10: Consider Climate Change Vulnerability and Riskin TransportationGoal #11: Consider Connected and Autonomous Vehicles(CAV) Technology in FutureGoals 1 through 8 and their associated objectives (summarized in the following section) originated in the Collier MPO 2040 LRTP. These goals were accepted by the Collier MPO Board on May 10, 2019. Goals 9 and 10 along with their associated objectives were added in response to new federal planning factors as well as input received from the TAC at their May 20, 2019 meeting.  Goals 9 and 10 address sustainability and resiliency, which are becoming more important in transportation planning as extreme weather events, such as flooding, severe heat, and intense storms, threaten the long‐term investments that federal, state, and local governments have made in transportation infrastructure. The Collier MPO added Goal 11 in response to the new FDOT requirement summarized as follows. In May 2018 the FDOT Office of Policy Planning issued Guidance for Assessing Planning Impacts and Opportunities of Automated, Connected, Electric and Shared‐Use Vehicle,3 which notes that a key role of MPOs in supporting the state of Florida’s 9.C.1Packet Pg. 297Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  3‐4  Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives transition to an Automated, Connected, Electric and Shared‐Use future will include developing policies and prioritizing projects that encourage shared‐use of vehicles.  Therefore, new FDOT requirements state that LRTPs must at a minimum: Assess capital investment and other measures necessary to make the most efficient use of existing transportation facilities to relieve vehicular congestion, improve safety, and maximize the mobility of people and goods. Such efforts must include, but are not limited to, consideration of infrastructure and technological improvements necessary to accommodate advances in vehicle technology, such as autonomous technology and other developments. [s.339.175(7)(c)(2), F.S.] Priorities: Goals, Objectives, and Evaluation Criteria The 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives are listed on the following pages. The goals provide a framework for realizing the LRTP vision. The objectives provide specific guidance on how to achieve each goal.  This LRTP is guided by the goals and objectives, each of which represents a specific element of how the transportation system should be managed for the next 25 years. The 11 goals are intended to maintain Collier County and its incorporated cities as livable communities and to improve the Countywide transportation system, keeping pace with growth and expected demand for transportation services in the region. Evaluation criteria were used to evaluate and compare how well potential transportation projects met the goals and objectives. Additionally, each goal was assigned a weighting factor that placed more emphasis on certain goals that require more focus in the Collier MPO transportation system. A project evaluation criterion shows the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed projects independently as well as in relation to each other. As shown on Figure 3‐2, this type of evaluation is ultimately used to develop the recom‐mendations and prioritize transportation projects in the Needs Assessment and Cost Feasible Plan. Figure 3‐2. LRTP Development Framework 9.C.1Packet Pg. 298Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  3‐5  Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives To support the performance‐based process emphasized in the FAST Act, the following pages present defined goals and objectives and the evaluation criteria applied to each proposed project.  Goal #1: Ensure the Security of Transportation System for Users The primary security issue for Collier County residents relates to implementation of sound emergency management plans. The primary threat to the County is extreme weather events, particularly hurricanes. As a result, emphasis has been placed on enhancing important evacuation routes.  The total weighting factor for this goal is 8 percent. Objectives:  Enhance important evacuation routes  Maintain sound transportation components of the emergency management plan for Collier County Project Evaluation Criteria:  Improves or maintains critical evacuation routes  Provides enhanced or potential new evacuation routes where needed Goal #2: Protect Environmental Resources Collier County is fortunate to have wide‐ranging environmental resources including extensive wetland resources and natural wildlife areas that greatly enhance the quality of life for resi‐dents and visitors. Protection of these resources has been highly valued in the 2045 LRTP.  The total weighting factor for this goal  is 12 percent. Objectives:  Minimize encroachment by transportation projects on wetlands and other protected natural areas   Minimize adverse impacts on threatened and endangered species Project Evaluation Criteria:  Minimize wetland encroachments by transportation projects   Minimize impacts to wetland flows (maintain or enhance existing flows to the extent feasible)  Minimize the adverse impacts on threatened and endangered species   9.C.1Packet Pg. 299Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3‐6 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Goal #3: Improve System Continuity and Connectivity Continuity and connectivity make it easier for residents and visitors to access the transportation system as directly as possible. Connectivity is a priority for all modes, and the future network provides direct routes and reduces travel time.  The total weighting factor for this goal is 10 percent. Objectives: Improve continuity and capacity of existing facilitiesPromote connectivity by creating new transportation linksCreate a network of direct routes between and withinareas of developmentProject Evaluation Criteria: Improves existing infrastructure deficienciesImproves connectivity with new transportation links toaddress system gapsGoal #4: Reduce Roadway Congestion Congestion and accompanying delay poses a serious cost to the residents of Collier County, reducing their access to jobs, education, health care, shopping, recreation, and other activities. The 2045 LRTP emphasizes reducing congestion to help enhance the quality of life for County residents.  The total weighting factor for this goal is 18 percent. Objectives: Reduce the number of deficient roadways (those with ahigh volume‐to‐capacity ratio) identified in the 2045existing plus committed (E+C) networkReduce travel delay between residential areas and keydestinationsProject Evaluation Criteria: Improves existing deficient facility or improves a new orneighboring facility intended to relieve an existingdeficient facilityImproves intersections and roadways with poor levels ofservice9.C.1Packet Pg. 300Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  3‐7  Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Goal #5: Promote Freight Movement Efficient freight movement is directly related to the economic well‐being of a community. The cost of moving freight is reflected in all consumables and in local production activities.  The total weighting factor for this goal is 6 percent.  Objectives:  Enhance movement on major regional freight mobility corridors or freight distribution routes  Improve access to freight activity centers (distribution facilities or major commercial/industrial districts) Project Evaluation Criteria:  Enhances operation of the facility identified as a major freight route Goal #6: Increase the Safety of the Transportation System for Users Safety of the transportation system is an important factor in the MPO's planning and project development process. The investment of projects that enhance safety will lead to reduced crashes and lower crash severity for all modes of transporta‐tion.  The total weighting factor for this goal is 10 percent. Objectives:   Reduce the number of fatalities, injuries, and crashes   Ensure adequate bicycle and pedestrian facilities are incorporated into new highway and transit projects  Implement safety‐related improvements on high crash corridors Project Evaluation Criteria:  Enhances safety of transportation system users  Improves facility or intersection identified as having a high crash occurrence or a fatality  Promotes traffic calming  Reduces vehicular conflicts with bicyclists, pedestrians, and other vulnerable road users   9.C.1Packet Pg. 301Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  3‐8  Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Goal #7: Promote Multimodal Solutions The County recognizes the importance of alternative forms of transportation that promote healthful living, improve air quality, and improve residents’ quality of life. The total weighting factor for this goal is 10 percent.  Objectives:  Improve frequency and reliability of public transit service routes and improve access to park‐and‐ride lots  Improve pedestrian and bicycle facilities  Improve air quality  Improve quality of life  Promote healthy living  Implement Complete Streets policies4 Project Evaluation Criteria:  Provides for trail improvements that implement the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan                                                             4 https://www.fdot.gov/roadway/csi/default.shtm  Provides multimodal improvement near affordable housing, centers of employment, multi‐family housing, health care, educational, recreational, or cultural centers  Provides multimodal improvements for environmental justice communities and underserved neighborhoods, and connects these neighborhoods to centers of employment and important destinations for transit‐dependent households  Improves transit (frequency and reliability) within existing or future transit service areas (TSA) or within a com‐munity redevelopment area (CRA); improves access to park‐and‐ride facilities; provides for BRT  Improves bicycle or pedestrian access to transit  Improves safety and access for people of all ages and abilities; improves safety for people walking, biking, and using mobility devices 9.C.1Packet Pg. 302Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  3‐9  Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Goal #8: Promote the Integrated Planning of Transportation and Land Use Transportation improvements can often result in new economic development and land use activity. In turn, decisions related to land use and economic development are often the basis for transportation system investments. The Collier MPO strives to develop projects that promote land use objectives of the County and its incorporated cities.  The total weighting factor for this goal is 10 percent. Objectives:  Coordinate with local governments and partner agencies to assure transportation plans and programs support local land use plans and a sustainable transportation system  Assure that local growth management objectives are reflected in transportation plans and programs  Assure that transportation plans and projects promote economic sustainability for the County Project Evaluation Criteria:  Improves access to regional travel (for example, interstates, airports, ports, and SIS facilities)  Improves access to tourist destinations  Supports targeted redevelopments or CRAs (multimodal or vehicle improvements)  Identified in partner agency (city, transit, county, MPO, etc.) plans as a priority   Improves vehicle or freight movement to an intermodal facility Goal #9: Promote Sustainability in the Planning of Transportation and Land Use A sustainable transportation system allows for the basic access and needs of the community to be met safely. It operates fairly and efficiently, offers a choice of transportation modes, and promotes equity for all users.  The total weighting factor for this goal is 8 percent.  Objectives:  Improve the sustainability of communities through increased access to affordable housing and centers of employment and reduced automobile dependency  Ensure that transportation system improvements are equitable and fair to all residents of the County  Engage a diverse public in the development of the region’s transportation system Project Evaluation Criteria:  Benefits low‐income areas and improves sustainability through increased housing choices and reduced automobile dependency 9.C.1Packet Pg. 303Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3‐10 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Goal #10: Consider Climate Change Vulnerability and Risk in Transportation  A resilient transportation system is one that supports mobility, system preservation, and evacuation needs, and addresses social equity. The total weighting factor for this goal is 4 percent. Objectives: Identify key climate impacts (rising sea levels, hurricanes,etc.)Identify sensitive assets and thresholds for impactsIdentify, evaluate, and adopt strategies to addressidentified vulnerabilitiesScreen projects during planning to avoid makinginvestments in particularly vulnerable areasProject Evaluation Criteria: Promotes transportation infrastructure resiliency in theface of climate change and sea level riseGoal #11: Consider Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAV) Technology in Future  Advances in automotive infrastructure technology through connected vehicles or self‐driving cars pose some of the biggest challenges to transportation planning (for example, equity among users). The potential for disruptions to transportations systems includes changes to land uses and the system network itself. However, because of the potential safety benefits, the Collier MPO is exploring ways to incorporate these technologies into the transportation network.  The total weighting factor for this goal is 4 percent. Objectives: Explore options for application and implementation ofCAV technologies, in light of the lack of current guidance.Consider new guidance and developments during theLRTP process.Project Evaluation Criteria: Uses technological improvements (for example, ITS,Transit Signal Priority, etc.)9.C.1Packet Pg. 304Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  3‐11  Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives 3‐3 Applying Priorities to Decision‐Making The 2045 LRTP development process builds upon the 2040 LRTP and input from the MPO Board, advisory committees, planning partners, and public input (surveys) to establish the long‐range vision statement for the MPO’s transportation system in 2045. The goals and objectives of the transportation plan are established to help realize this vision. The goals and objectives of the LRTP ultimately guide the entire LRTP development process by creating a decision‐making framework through which projects can be evaluated and ranked to define and document project priorities. Evaluation Criteria for Project Selection Like the goals and objectives, the 2045 LRTP evaluation criteria (refer to Table 3‐1) build upon the evaluation criteria established in the 2040 plan. Evaluation criteria are used to   evaluate and then compare how well potential transportation projects meet the goals and objectives. Each criterion is assigned a weighting factor that places more emphasis on those criteria that require more focus in the Collier MPO transportation system. Ultimately, this type of evaluation is used to develop the recommendations and prioritize transportation projects. The evaluation criteria and performance measures listed in Table 3‐1 demonstrate the scoring methodology for project evaluation and selection, creating an actionable way for the vision, goals, and objectives to shape project selection.   9.C.1Packet Pg. 305Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  3‐12  Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Table 3‐1. 2045 LRTP Evaluation Criteria and Performance Measures Goal Evaluation Criteria Performance Measures Weighting (out of 100) 1. Ensure the Security of Transportation System for Users Total Weighting Factor: 8% 1A ‐ Improves or maintains critical evacuation routes Yes = 5; No = 0 4 1B ‐ Provides enhanced or potential new evacuation routes where needed Does the roadway connect to an existing evacuation route or does it have potential to be a new evacuation route (for example, major extension or new project that connects to a Strategic Intermodal System?) Yes = 5; No = 0 4 2. Protect Environmental Resources Total Weighting Factor: 12% 2A ‐ Minimize wetland encroachments by transportation projects  How many acres of wetland encroachment based on National Wetlands Inventory? No impact  =  0;  0–5 acres = ‐1;  6–10 acres = ‐2;  11–15 = ‐3;  15–20 = ‐4;  21 or more = ‐5 (max) 4 2B ‐ Minimize impacts to wetland flows (maintain or enhance existing flows to the extent feasible) Proximity to protected natural areas (0.5 miles) Within 0.5 miles of Conservation Areas/Preserves lands? Yes = ‐1 No = 0 4 2C ‐ Minimize the adverse impacts on threatened and endangered species Amount of habitat encroachment based on primary panther habitat? No impact =  0 0–10 acres = ‐1 11–20 acres = ‐2 21–30 = ‐3 31–40 = ‐4  40 or more  = ‐5 (max) 4 9.C.1Packet Pg. 306Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  3‐13  Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Table 3‐1. 2045 LRTP Evaluation Criteria and Performance Measures Goal Evaluation Criteria Performance Measures Weighting (out of 100) 3. Improve System Continuity and Connectivity Total Weighting Factor: 10% 3A ‐ Improves existing infrastructure deficiencies Does the project improve mobility in an existing roadway facility (for example, widening, intersection improvements, etc.)?  Yes = 5; No = 0 5 3B ‐ Improves connectivity with new transportation links to address system gaps Does the project improve connectivity with a new facility including projects that are extensions that connect to future or existing facilities? Yes = 5; No = 0 5 4. Reduce Roadway Congestion Total Weighting Factor: 18% 4A ‐ Improves existing deficient facility or improves a new or neighboring facility intended to relieve an existing deficient facility Does the project increase capacity or provide relief to a parallel facility (for example, new facilities, bridges over canals, etc.)?  Yes = 5; No = 0 9 4B ‐ Improves intersections and roadways with poor levels of service Does capacity ratio decrease when compared to the 2045 E+C Alternative?   Yes = 5; No = 0 9 5. Promote Freight Movement Total Weighting Factor: 6% 5 ‐ Enhances operation of the facility identified as a major freight route Is the roadway on a regional freight mobility corridor, freight distribution route, or connects to a freight activity center as outlined in the 2040 LRTP?  Yes = 5; No = 0 6 6. Increase the Safety of Transportation System Users Total Weighting Factor: 10% 6A ‐ Enhances safety of transportation system users Does project implement a recommendation from a safety plan (for example, safe routes to school, protected bike lanes, etc.)? Yes = 5; No = 0 2 6B ‐ Improves facility or intersection identified as having a high crash occurrence or a fatality High crash location or segment?  Yes = 5; No = 0 4 6C – Promotes traffic calming Does the project improve safety by calming traffic (for example, gateway treatments, roundabouts, reduced width and turning 2 9.C.1Packet Pg. 307Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of  Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan  3‐14  Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Table 3‐1. 2045 LRTP Evaluation Criteria and Performance Measures Goal Evaluation Criteria Performance Measures Weighting (out of 100) radii)? Are vehicular speeds appropriate to context and facility type? Yes = 5; No = 0 6D ‐ Reduces vehicular conflicts with bicyclists, pedestrians, and other vulnerable road users High crash location or segment for bicycle and pedestrian conflicts?  Yes = 5; No = 0 2 7. Promote Multimodal Solutions Total Weighting Factor: 10% 7A ‐ Provides for trail improvements that implement the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan New or improved trail/greenways = 5 No new or improved trail = 0 2 7B ‐ Provides multimodal improvement near affordable housing, centers of employment, multi‐family housing, health care, educational, recreational, or cultural centers Improvement within 0.25 miles = 5 No improvement within 0.25 mile = 0 2 7C ‐ Provides multimodal improvements for environmental justice communities and underserved neighborhoods, and connects these neighborhoods to centers of employment and important destinations for transit‐dependent households Improvement within 0.25 miles = 5  No improvement within 0.25 miles = 0 2 7D ‐ Improves transit (frequency and reliability) within existing or future TSAs or within a CRA; improves access to park‐and‐ride facilities; provides for BRT  Project along an existing or planned bus route within an existing or future TSA  = 5  Project along an existing or planned bus route inside a CRA = 5  Improves access to park‐and‐ride facility = 5 Provides for BRT = 5 1 9.C.1Packet Pg. 308Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3‐15 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Table 3‐1. 2045 LRTP Evaluation Criteria and Performance Measures Goal Evaluation Criteria Performance Measures Weighting (out of 100) No improvement = 0 7E ‐ Improves bicycle or pedestrian access to transit  Improve Access = 5;  No improvement = 0 2 7F – Improves safety and access for people of all ages and abilities; improves safety for people walking, biking, and using mobility devices Improvement = 5 No improvement = 0 1 8.Promote the IntegratedPlanning of Transportationand Land UseTotal Weighting Factor: 10%8A ‐ Improves access to regional travel (for example, interstates, airports, ports, and SIS facilities) Improves access = 5 Does not improve access = 0 4 8B ‐ Improves access to tourist destinations Improves access = 5 Does not improve access = 0 2 8C ‐ Supports targeted redevelopments or CRAs (multimodal or vehicle improvements) Yes = 5 No = 0 2 8D ‐ Identified in partner agency (city, transit, county, MPO, etc.) as a priority Connections to other municipalities or counties? Yes = 5 No = 0 1 8E ‐ Improves vehicle or freight movement to an intermodal facility Does the project improve vehicle or freight movement to intermodal facilities (for example, airport, bus transfer station, freight center, park and ride, etc.)?  Yes = 5 No = 0 1 9.C.1Packet Pg. 309Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 3‐16 Chapter 3 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives Table 3‐1. 2045 LRTP Evaluation Criteria and Performance Measures Goal Evaluation Criteria Performance Measures Weighting (out of 100) 9.Promote Sustainability inthe Planning ofTransportation and LandUseTotal Weighting Factor: 8%9A ‐ Benefits low‐income areas and improves sustainability through increased housing choices and reduced automobile dependency Does the project bring better mobility to a low‐income areas and CRAs (for example, bike/ped improvements along a bus route or stop, etc.)? Project in target area=5 Project not in target area=0 8 10. Consider Climate ChangeVulnerability and Risk inTransportation Decision‐MakingTotal Weighting Factor: 4%10A ‐ Promotes transportation infrastructure resiliency in the face of climate change and sea level rise Within 0.25 miles of NOAA 1 ft Sea Level Rise Flooding Area =5 Within 0.25 miles of NOAA 1 ft Sea Level Rise Low Lying Area = 3 Not in high risk area = 0 4 11. Consider Connected andAutonomous Vehicles(CAV) Technology in theFutureTotal Weighting Factor: 4%11A ‐ Utilizes technological improvements (ITS, Transit Signal Priority, etc.) Yes = 5 No = 0 4 9.C.1Packet Pg. 310Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Chapter 4 – System‐wide Needs  Assessment August 2020 Reviewed by TAC/CAC 8/31/20 and 9/28/20DRAFT9.C.1Packet Pg. 311Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan i Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Contents Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4-1 Needs Plan Overview ................................................................................................................................................................ 4-1 4-2 Roadway Needs......................................................................................................................................................................... 4-4 Existing Plus Committed Projects ............................................................................................................................................. 4-5 Other Roadway Needs Considerations ................................................................................................................................... 4-12 Ranking the Roadway Needs .................................................................................................................................................. 4-23 2045 Roadway Needs Results ................................................................................................................................................. 4-27 4-3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs ................................................................................................................................................. 4-39 Vision Goals and Objectives .................................................................................................................................................... 4-39 Identification of Network Needs ............................................................................................................................................ 4-40 Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ........................................................................................................................... 4-40 Existing Plus Proposed Facilities ............................................................................................................................................. 4-43 Local and Residential Roads .................................................................................................................................................... 4-43 Local Agency Priorities on Local Roads ................................................................................................................................... 4-43 4-4 Transit Needs .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4-44 4-5 Air Transportation Needs ........................................................................................................................................................ 4-44 Naples Airport ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4-44 Immokalee Regional Airport ................................................................................................................................................... 4-45 Marco Island Executive Airport ............................................................................................................................................... 4-45 Everglades Airpark .................................................................................................................................................................. 4-45 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan ii Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Tables Table 4-1. 2045 Existing Plus Committed (E+C) Projects ......................................................................................................................... 4-8 Table 4-2. East of CR 951 Bridge Reevaluation Study Bridges ............................................................................................................... 4-13 Table 4-3. TSPR Top Road Segment Crash Locations (2014–2018) ....................................................................................................... 4-19 Table 4-4. Mitigation Strategies ............................................................................................................................................................. 4-24 Table 4-5. Potential Positive and Negative Effects Resulting from ACES Technologies ........................................................................ 4-27 Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects ........................................................................................................................................... 4-29 Table 4-7. Network Gaps/Facility Needs ............................................................................................................................................... 4-41 Table 4-7. Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ......................................................................................................................... 4-42 Figures Figure 4-1. FDOT Context Classifications ................................................................................................................................................. 4-3 Figure 4-2. 2045 Existing Plus Committed (E+C) Project Map ................................................................................................................. 4-7 Figure 4-3. 2045 E+C Travel Network Congestion Map ......................................................................................................................... 4-11 Figure 4-4. Freight Network and Activity Centers ................................................................................................................................. 4-15 Figure 4-5. Congestion Management Process Eight-Step Framework .................................................................................................. 4-16 Figure 4-6. TSPR Congestion Hot Spot Locations ................................................................................................................................... 4-17 Figure 4-6. TSPR Congestion Hot Spot Locations ................................................................................................................................... 4-17 Figure 4-7. 2019 and 2020 CMP ITS/Active Roadway Management Projects ....................................................................................... 4-22 Figure 4-8. Resiliency Planning Considerations ..................................................................................................................................... 4-25 Figure 4-9. 2045 Needs Plan Project Map ............................................................................................................................................. 4-28 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-1 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan 4-1 Needs Plan Overview The 2045 LRTP Needs Plan identifies the multimodal transportation projects needed to address existing and future transportation network deficiencies within the MPO’s jurisdiction without considering funding limitations. Developing the Needs Plan is the starting point for understanding and prioritizing the region’s overall transportation needs. However, once the applicable transportation revenues available to the Collier MPO are applied to the Needs Plan, the number of projects that can be constructed to address the needs becomes significantly reduced. Projects in the Needs Plan are evaluated by scoring each project using defined goals and objectives, and the evaluation criteria described in Chapter 3. The projects that rank the highest are focused on when selecting which projects to include in the Cost Feasible Plan. This process is explained further in the Cost Feasible Plan section of this document. While the projects shown as transportation needs are not fiscally constrained, associated policy and environmental constraints exist. The following policy constraints are noted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan Transportation Element amended June 13, 2017:1 • All future roadway capacity improvements shall include provisions for both bicycles and pedestrians. • County facilities are to be maintained at a level of service (LOS) standard “D” or “E” as measured on a peak hour basis; LOS calculations are to be based on traffic 1 https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=74327 experienced for 10 months of the year with peak seasonal and tourist months of February and March omitted. • County roadways are constrained to a maximum of six lanes or when intensive land use development is immediately adjacent to roads. Roadways identified as constrained shall be subject to growth restrictions to not further degrade their LOS. • The County will provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future right-of-way (ROW). Sufficient ROW shall be acquired to facilitate arterial and collector roads as appropriate to meet the needs of the LRTP or other adopted transportation studies, plans or programs, appropriate turn lanes, medians, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, drainage canals, a shoulder sufficient for pull offs, and landscaping areas. • The County is considering the viability of a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan ordinance to preserve ROW for corridors or projects listed in the LRTP. This policy includes adoption of Corridor Preservation Maps and Tables and Critical Intersection Maps and Tables; and limits land uses within the corridors to direct incompatible land uses away from environmentally sensitive resources. • Reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and greenhouse gas emissions by providing for the safe movement of nonmotorized vehicles in new construction and reconstruction of roadways. • Establish an integrated and connected road network to provide multiple, viable alternative travel modes or routes for common trips within the Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-2 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan and the East Central TCMA. Maintain 85 percent of the roadways within the TCMAs at or above the County LOS standard. • Transportation projects are to be pursued in a manner consistent with the findings of the County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). • Encourage safe and efficient mobility for people traveling in rural areas that is compatible with the character of the County’s rural areas. Examine the maintenance and operational needs of the rural roadway system, addressing the mobility needs of rural residents to include availability of roads for rural-to-urban travel, travel within the rural area, and for emergency evacuation purposes. • Improve transit services for the transportation- disadvantaged in rural areas. • Encourage the efficient use of transit services now and, in the future, consider intergovernmental efforts to coordinate public transit service between Naples and Bonita Springs in Lee County. In September 2014, FDOT adopted the Statewide Complete Streets Policy (Topic No. 000-625-017-a). Additionally, the City of Naples and the Collier County Board of County Commission (BCC) approved Complete Streets Resolutions in November 2015 and January 2019, respectively. Complete Streets serve the transportation needs of users of all ages and abilities, including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, motorists, and freight handlers. A transportation system based on Complete Streets principles can help to promote safety, quality of life, and economic development. Complete Streets are context-sensitive, and the approach provides transportation system design that considers local land development patterns. Roadways are to be planned and designed to support the safety, comfort, and mobility of all users based on the unique context of each roadway. The FDOT context classification system broadly identifies the various built environments existing in Florida. Identifying the context classification is a preliminary step in planning and design, as different context classifications will have different design criteria. The context classification of each roadway must be considered, along with its transportation characteristics and the built form to understand who uses or could use it, the regional and local travel demand of the roadway, and the challenges and opportunities of each roadway user. As shown on Figure 4-1, FDOT defined eight context classifications that identify various built environments in Florida. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-3 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan The following policy constraints are noted in the City of Naples Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element amended October 20, 2010:2 • Evaluate proposed street improvements in Naples that may potentially increase through traffic volumes to protect residential neighborhoods. • Maintain LOS C as a goal for the arterials and all major collectors, except for Fifth Avenue South between U.S. 41 and Gulf Shore Boulevard. 2https://www.naplesgov.com/sites/default/files/fileattachments/pl anning/page/4451/comprehensive_plan_120613_20131206090451 3380.pdf • Naples shall not permit construction of vehicle road overpasses or flyovers in favor of feasible alternative planning solutions that will improve the long-term traffic circulation patterns in the City. • Evaluate programs to modify peak hour travel demand and reduce the number of VMT per capita. • Assist the Southwest Florida Land Preservation Trust in acquiring necessary easements and funding for the design and construction of a greenway bicycle/pedestrian pathway. • Maintain or reduce hurricane evacuation times. Figure 4-1. FDOT Context Classifications Source: FDOT Context Classification Guide, July 2020 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-4 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan • Enhance the safety, connectivity, and mobility of existing and future pedestrian and bicycle pathways. • Continue to coordinate with the Collier MPO to evaluate the potential for developing an efficient public transportation system and mechanisms to reduce the reliance on private motor vehicles. • Establish a transportation mobility program to identify and implement strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Focus on programs, policies, and code adoptions that have a net impact of reduced travel delays, reduced vehicular trips, reduced vehicle trip length, and measures to improve the efficiency of travel. The following policy constraints are noted in the City of Marco Island Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element amended December 7, 2009:3 • Maintain designated LOS for arterial, collector, and local roads on Marco Island. Marco Island’s adopted LOS reflect generalized maximum daily volumes as derived from peak hour traffic conditions: – Arterials: LOS D (except SR 951 from the Jolley Bridge to CR 92—LOS C) – Collectors: LOS D – Local Roads: LOS D Finally, environmental constraints include conservation lands in the northeastern and southeastern parts of the County, wetlands, threatened and endangered species habitat, and primary and secondary canal systems throughout the County. 3https://www.cityofmarcoisland.com/sites/default/files/fileattachm ents/growth_management/page/5551/compplanpart1_2009.pdf The 2045 Needs Plan incorporates all transportation modes, including roadway needs for motorists and freight, transit, bicycle, and walking or using a mobility device. The following sections detail the County needs for projects related to these transportation modes as well as technologies, such as ITS and CAV. This chapter breaks down the 2045 Needs Plan by Roadway Needs, Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs, and Transit Needs. 4-2 Roadway Needs The initial approach to developing the list of roadway project needs included a review of the following plans: • Collier MPO 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan, Amended May 25, 2018, and September 9, 2016 • Collier MPO Transportation Improvement Program FY 2021 – FY 2025 (Adopted June 12, 2020) • Collier MPO Transportation System Performance Report & Action Plan Draft Baseline Report (2020) • Collier MPO Transportation System Performance Report & Action Plan Draft Action Plan (2020) • Collier MPO Congestion Management Process 2017 Update • Collier 2040 LRTP Freight Congestion Considerations Technical Memorandum • Collier MPO 2040 Long Range Transit Element, November 2015 • Collier MPO Local Road Safety Plan, 2020 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-5 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan •Collier MPO Transit Development Plan Major Update, 2020 •Collier Area Transit (CAT) Transit Development Plan FY 2019 Annual Progress Report •Collier MPO Park and Ride Study, 2020 •Collier County Annual Update & Inventory Report/Capital Improvement Element Schedule Update on Public Facilities, November 2019 •Collier County Community Housing Plan, October 24, 2017 •National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Sea Level Rise Viewer •Adaptation of Coastal Urban and Natural Ecosystems (ACUNE) (pending) •Collier County Transportation Capital Improvement Program, 2019 •Collier County Airport Authority Immokalee Regional Airport, Airport Layout Plan Update, August 2017 •City of Naples Airport Authority, Naples Airport Master Plan, February 29, 2020 •FDOT Strategic Intermodal System 2029 – 2045 Long Range Cost Feasible Plan •FDOT Strategic Intermodal System Funding Strategy First Five Year Plan Multi-Modal FY 2020/2021 through FY 2024/2025 •FDOT Strategic Intermodal System Funding Strategy Second Five Year Plan Multi-Modal FY 2025/2026 through FY 2029/2030 •FDOT Freight Mobility and Trade Plan, April 2020 •FDOT Guidance for Assessing Planning Impacts and Opportunities of Automated, Connected, Electric and Shared-Use Vehicles, September 2018 •University of South Florida Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) Autonomous Vehicle (AV) and Alternative Fuel Vehicle (AFV) Florida Market Penetration Rate and VMT Assessment Study, October 2019. •U.S. Department of Transportation Preparing for the Future of Transportation: Automated Vehicles 3.0, October 2018 Additional approaches to developing the Needs Plan included collaboration with regional partners including the Lee County MPO, coordination with the Collier County Transportation Traffic and Planning Divisions, scenario planning analysis, travel demand modeling, and soliciting and incorporating public input. Further, several coordination meetings with the TAC and CAC were held during the development of the Needs Plan. Existing Plus Committed Projects As described in Chapter 2, the initial list of project needs was developed by first modeling the E+C travel network. The E+C network includes all new road or capacity projects that have been implemented since 2015 (existing), plus all projects that have construction funded in the 2023 FDOT Five Year Work Program. The E+C characterizes the transportation network expected to be in place by the year 2023 (constructed or funded for construction). Figure 4-2 and Table 4-1 present the E+C roadway projects in graphic and tabular formats, respectively. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-6 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan FDOT modeled the E+C travel network using the D1RPM travel demand model and the 2045 socioeconomic data discussed in Chapter 2. The modeling result helped identify deficiencies in the roadway network and showed which roadway segments were expected to be congested in 2045 if no further improvements were made to the surrounding network. Congestion was measured using the ratio of the forecasted traffic volume in Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) to the capacity of the roadway segment (at LOS D), referred to as the volume to capacity (V/C) ratio. A roadway is considered over capacity if the V/C ratio greater than 1.0. Figure 4-3 presents the anticipated roadway congestion in 2045 if no improvements to the network are made beyond the E+C projects. The roadway facilities predicted to experience high (V/C = 1.15 to 1.5) and significant (V/C > 1.5) levels of congestion in 2045 are listed in the following text. 2045 Facilities with High Degree of Congestion (V/C = 1.15 to 1.5) • US 41 north of Immokalee Road • Immokalee Road east of Airport Road N • Immokalee Road east of I-75 • Immokalee Road west of I-75 • Immokalee Road east of Collier Boulevard to Randall Boulevard • Immokalee Road north of Stockade Road • Immokalee Road from SR 29 to Camp Keas Road • Randall Boulevard east of 8th Street NE • Oil Well Road between Everglades Boulevard and Oil Well Grade Road • SR 29 north of Westclox Road • Everglades Boulevard north of Oil Well Road • Pine Ridge Road east of Livingston Road • Old 41 Road east of US 41/Tamiami Trail to Lee County • Vanderbilt Beach Road west of US 41 • Intersection at Collier Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway • Collier Boulevard north of Golden Gate Parkway • Santa Barbara Boulevard north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road • Park Shore Drive west of Clayton Road • I-75 north of Immokalee Road • Intersection at I-75 and Immokalee Road • Intersection at I-75 and Pine Ridge Road • Intersection at I-75 and Golden Gate Parkway 2045 Facilities with a Significant Degree of Congestion (V/C >1.5) • Collier Boulevard north of Pine Ridge Road • Golden Gate Boulevard from east of 16th Street SE to Everglades Boulevard • SR 29 (N 15th Street) at the intersection of Westclox Road 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-7 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Figure 4-2. 2045 Existing Plus Committed (E+C) Project Map 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-8 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-1. 2045 Existing Plus Committed (E+C) Projects Map ID Roadway From To Improvement Agency or Municipality Included in 2019–2023 TIP? Existing (2015–2019) 19 I-75 North of SR 951 Golden Gate Pkwy Widen from Four to Six Lanes FDOT FPN: 406313-4 N/A 20 SR 951 Manatee Road North of Tower Rd Widen from Two to Four Lanes FDOT FPN: 435111-2 N/A 21 City Gate Blvd. Extension White Lake Blvd. East of Brennan Dr New Four-Lane Facility Collier County N/A 22 Golden Gate Blvd. Wilson Blvd. 20th St. Widen from Two to Four Lanes Collier County N/A 23 Logan Blvd. North of Immokalee Rd. Lee County Line New Two-Lane Facility Collier County N/A 24 Massey St./Woodcrest Dr. Calusa Pines Dr. Immokalee Rd. New Two-Lane Facility Collier County N/A 25 Pristine Dr. Wolfe Rd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd New Two-Lane Facility Collier County N/A 26 Tree Farm Rd. Davila St Massey St New Two-Lane Facility Collier County N/A 51 I-75 Golden Gate Parkway SB Off Ramp - Interchange Improvements FDOT FPN: 429907-1 N/A 53 SR 29 Jefferson Avenue 9th Street Add Turn Lanes FDOT FPN: 431390-2 N/A 54 SR 82 Corkscrew Road - Add Turn Lanes FDOT FPN: 433175-1 N/A 55 Airport Pulling Rd. North Horseshoe Dr. - Intersection Improvements Collier County N/A 56 Golden Gate Pkwy. Livingston Rd. - Intersection Improvements Collier County N/A 57 Pine Ridge Rd. US 41 - Intersection Improvements Collier County N/A 70 8th Street Bridge New Bridge Collier County N/A 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-9 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-1. 2045 Existing Plus Committed (E+C) Projects Map ID Roadway From To Improvement Agency or Municipality Included in 2019–2023 TIP? Committed (2019–2023) 29 Airport Pulling Rd.a Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Immokalee Rd. Widen from Four to Six Lanes Collier County Yes 30 Randall Blvd. Immokalee Rd. 8th St. Widen from Two to Four Lanes Collier County Yes 31 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. US 41 East. of Goodlette- Frank Rd. Widen from Four to Six Lanes Collier County Yes 32 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension a Collier Blvd. Curry Canal Widen from Two to Six Lanes Collier County Yes 33 Veterans Memorial Blvd. Old US 41 Secoya Reserve Cir New Four-Lane Facility Collier County Yes 34 Veterans Memorial Blvd. Secoya Reserve Cir Strand Blvd. Widen from Two to Four Lanes Collier County Yes 35 Whippoorwill Lane Pine Ridge Rd. Stratford Ln Widen from Two to Four Lanes Collier County Yes 36 SR 82 Gator Slough Lane SR 29 Widen from Two to Four Lanes FDOT FPN: 430849-1 Yes 37 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension a Curry Canal Wilson Blvd. New Four-Lane Facility Collier County Yes 38 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension a Wilson Blvd. 16th St. New Two-Lane Facility Expandable to Four Lanes Collier County Yes 58 US 41 Oasis Visitor Center - Add Left-Turn Lane FDOT FPN: 441975-1 Yes 59 Immokalee Rd. Woodcrest Dr. - Intersection Improvements Collier County Yes 60 Pine Ridge Rd.a Livingston Rd. - Intersection Improvements Collier County Yes 61 Randall Blvd.a Immokalee Rd. - Intersection Improvements Collier County Yes 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-10 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-1. 2045 Existing Plus Committed (E+C) Projects Map ID Roadway From To Improvement Agency or Municipality Included in 2019–2023 TIP? 62 Triangle Blvd.a Celeste Dr. - Roundabout Implementation Collier County Yes 63 10th St. 5th Ave North - Roundabout Implementation City of Naples Yes 64 3rd Ave. South 8th St. South - Roundabout Implementation City of Naples Yes 67 Mooring Line Dr. Crayton Rd. - Roundabout Implementation City of Naples Yes 71 16th Street Bridge 16th St. 16th St. New Bridge Collier County Yes 73 Crayton Rd. Harbour Dr. - Roundabout Implementation City of Naples Yes 75 Price St.a Waterford Dr. - Roundabout Implementation Collier County Yes Sources: FDOT Collier County Five Year Work Program FY 2019-2023, Collier County AUIR Five Year Work Program FY 2019-2023, Collier County One-Cent Sales Surtax Website a Collier One-Cent Sales Surtax Transportation Project Note: FPN = Financial Project Number 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-11 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Figure 4-3. 2045 E+C Travel Network Congestion Map 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-12 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Other Roadway Needs Considerations Once the initial list of roadway projects needs was developed based on the E+C roadway deficiency modeling, other roadway-related needs data were evaluated to develop a more comprehensive project needs list. Considerations included review of existing planning studies, freight needs, and congestion management strategies, which included safety issues and Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O). Existing Planning Studies The MPO reviewed the existing County planning studies described below to identify potential projects eligible for the roadway Needs Plan. These studies were recently completed or are currently underway. Randall Boulevard/Oil Well Road Study Area The County completed a corridor study to evaluate potential roadway network improvements near Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road. The study evaluated several corridor alterna- tives to enhance traffic operations and safety conditions based on current and future travel demands. On May 14, 2019, the Collier BCC voted to approve the staff recom- mendation to expand Randall Boulevard (between 8th Street and Everglades Boulevard) to six lanes, Randall Boulevard (between Everglades Boulevard and Desoto Boulevard) to four lanes, and Everglades Boulevard (between Oil Well Road and Randall Boulevard) to four lanes. CR 951 Congestion Relief Study This study is intended to identify an alternative travel route to the existing County Road (CR) 951 (Collier Boulevard) corridor because of forecasted high congestion levels by 2045. The preliminary study area extends east of CR 951 from City Gate Boulevard North at its northern limit to Benfield Road on its eastern limit and to US 41 at its southern limits. Potential alternative solutions include multiple travel routes, improve- ments to CR 951, a no-build option, and evaluation of other alternative planning strategies to alleviate future congestion on CR 951. Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study The Immokalee Road (CR 846) Corridor Congestion Study is evaluating the future levels of congestion along the Immokalee Road Corridor between Livingston Road and Logan Boulevard. Potential improvements will be considered at the main intersections along the corridor which include: •Conventional “At-Grade” Improvements (widening) •Continuous Flow Intersections •Jug Handle •Single Point Urban Interchange •Restricted Crossing U-Turn •Diverging Diamond Interchange at I-75 The study is expected to be completed in the spring of 2021. East of CR 951 Bridge Reevaluation Study In August 2008, the County conducted the East of CR 951 Infrastructure and Services Horizon Study to evaluate missing bridge connections based on system-wide infrastructure needs that considered transportation circulation, access management, schools, parks, law enforcement, emergency services, fire, libraries, storm water management, and public utilities. The study’s stakeholders identified 12 preferred canal crossing locations and ranked the bridges based on criteria related to mobility, service efficiency, and emergency response. The new bridges would be strategically located throughout the Golden Gate Estates area to reduce trip lengths and travel demand on already congested collector roadways and to provide the greatest opportunity to reduce 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-13 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan response time for first responders. In 2018, County voters approved a 1-cent infrastructure surtax that included specifically earmarked funding for constructing the new bridges. In 2019, the County completed construction of a new bridge on 8th Street with funding from FDOT. The County has also programmed construction of a new bridge on 16th Street in the Five Year Work Program with funds from the infra- structure surtax proceeds. The surtax funds will be available to construct the remaining 10 bridges within the next 7 years. The remaining 10 bridges are the subject of the 2020 East of CR 951 Bridge Reevaluation Study, which is being performed to reconfirm the validity of the remaining 10 recommended bridge locations before moving the remaining bridge projects into production. Table 4-2 presents the bridge locations. Table 4-2. East of CR 951 Bridge Reevaluation Study Bridges Map IDa New Bridge Projects 81 47th Ave. NE (between Immokalee Rd. & Everglades Blvd.) 82 Wilson Blvd. N (south of 33rd Ave NE) 83 18th Ave. NE (between Wilson Ave & 8th St. NE) 84 18th Ave. NE (between 8th St. NE & 16th St. NE) 85 North End of 13th St. NW (north of Golden Gate Blvd.) 86 16th St. SE (south of Golden Gate Blvd.) 87 10th Ave. SE (between Everglades Blvd. and Desoto Blvd.) 88 Wilson Blvd. S (south of Golden Gate Blvd.) 89 62nd Ave. NE (between Everglades Blvd. and 40th St. NE) 4 https://www.colliermpo.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/3-Freight- Considerations-Tech-Memo.pdf Table 4-2. East of CR 951 Bridge Reevaluation Study Bridges Map IDa New Bridge Projects 115 23rd St. SW (south of Golden Gate Blvd.) a Refer to Figure 4-9 Freight The Collier Freight Network is defined in the Collier MPO 2040 LRTP Freight Congestion Considerations Technical Memorandum4 as including limited-access facilities, regional freight mobility corridors, and freight distribution routes. Collier County’s freight transportation network system consists of numerous freight mobility corridors and freight distribution routes that support the state and regional economy. Rail access to the County is limited to a 1-mile section of the Seminole Gulf Railway in the far northwest corner of the County. In addition to providing traditional rail freight transportation, the rail line supplies regional trucking and logistical services, as well as warehousing and distribution from its distribution center located in North Fort Myers. Review of truck traffic volumes in the FDOT Florida Traffic Online site reveals that volumes are greatest along the portion of I-75 north of Immokalee Road where trucks comprise more than 8 percent of total AADT.5 Truck traffic volumes show that this section has daily truck volumes exceeding 8,500 per day. The portion of I-75 between Pine Ridge Road and north of Immokalee Road has truck volumes exceeding 7,500 per day and trucks make up between 8 to 10 percent of the total AADT. Along SR 29 south of I-75, truck volumes make up 26 percent of the total AADT. However, the total traffic 5 FDOT Traffic Online (2019 Volumes) https://tdaappsprod.dot.state.fl.us/fto/ 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-14 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan volumes along this segment are low compared to other areas in the County. Limited-Access Facilities I-75 is the only limited-access facility within the County and is a major element of the Florida SIS. It serves as the primary transportation facility connecting Collier County with its immediate neighboring counties, the rest of Florida, and the National Highway System. It also serves as a major commuter corridor. Regional Freight Mobility Corridors The regional freight mobility corridors function as connectors between limited-access facilities and regional freight activity centers. Within the County, the regional freight mobility corridors consist of: • SR 29 (I-75 to Hendry County Line) • SR 82 (SR 29 to Hendry County Line) • SR 84/Davis Boulevard (US 41 to I-75) • US 41 (SR 84/Davis Boulevard to Lee County Line) Freight Distribution Routes Freight distribution routes serve to distribute truck traffic to local delivery areas. These include state roadways and other local roadways designated in local truck route ordinances at the county and municipal levels. The freight distribution routes within the County consist of: • SR 29 (US 41 to I-75) 6 https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default- source/rail/fmtp/april-2020/fmtp-tm-vp-april-2020.pdf • CR 951/Collier Boulevard (Marco Island to US 41) • CR 951/Collier Boulevard (US 41 to CR 846/Immokalee Road) • CR 858/Oil Well Road (CR 846/Immokalee Road to SR 29) • CR 846/Immokalee Road (US 41 to SR 29) • Golden Gate Boulevard (CR 951/Collier Boulevard to DeSoto Boulevard) • CR 896/Pine Ridge Road (US 41 to CR 951/Collier Boulevard) • US 41 (SR 84/Davis Boulevard to Dade County Line) • Old US 41 (US 41 to Lee County Line) Freight Activity Centers The northwestern portion of the County has been identified in the FDOT Freight Mobility and Trade Plan 6 as a low to medium freight activity hotspot within Florida. These hotspots distribute or attract large amounts of freight activities and have a significant impact on Florida’s transportation system and economy. There are two types of freight activity centers (FACs) located in the County: primary and secondary (refer to Figure 4-4). Primary FACs are large industrial and manu- facturing areas that send or receive freight in large quantities or for further distribution to the consumer market. Secondary FACs include significant mining and agricultural operations, which sometimes have intermittent or seasonal demands. There are five primary and four secondary FACs within the County. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-15 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Figure 4-4. Freight Network and Activity Centers 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-16 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan While the Old US 41 Industrial area has limited rail service, it is the only FAC in the County with the potential for intermodal rail activities and should be preserved for future freight- related development as economic conditions warrant. Additionally, a 60-acre zone in and around the Immokalee Airport is designated as a Foreign Trade Zone.7 With convenient access to SIS facilities including SR 29, SR 82, and I- 75, the Immokalee Airport is well-suited for existing and future intermodal air-cargo/truck activities. Congestion Management The Collier MPO is federally mandated to implement a Congestion Management Process.8 A CMP is developed to improve traffic flow and safety conditions. As discussed in Chapter 1, the Collier MPO CMC is responsible for creating and amending the CMP and for prioritizing candidate congestion management projects to be funded with federal and state funding. As presented on Figure 4-5, the CMP is a detailed eight-step process that an urban area follows to improve the performance of its transportation system by reducing the negative impacts of traffic congestion. The Collier MPO Transportation System Performance Report (TSPR) and Action Plan Baseline Condition Report 9 provides an evaluation of existing and future congestion issues in the County. Figure 4-6 presents congestion hot spot locations in the County that were assessed for congestion management strategies in the TSPR. The hot spot locations were sorted into three tiers to identify which of the hot spot locations had the most causes of congestion. Tier 1 represents road segments influenced by three or more congestion causes, Tier 2 represents road segments influenced by two congestion 7 https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-a-e/airport- authority/immokalee-regional-airport 8 https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/plan4ops/focus_areas/cmp.htm causes, and Tier 3 in represents road segments influenced by one congestion cause. Sources of congestion included school congestion, safety, V/C ratio, speed, and public comments. Figure 4-5. Congestion Management Process Eight- Step Framework 9 https://www.colliermpo.org/wp-content/uploads/Baseline-Conditions- Report-V5-Combined-1.pdf 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-17 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Figure 4-6. TSPR Congestion Hot Spot Locations 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-18 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Safety Issues The Collier MPO TSPR and Action Plan Baseline Condition Report, along with the Collier MPO Local Road Safety Plan companion study, further identified the top intersection and roadway segment crash locations that were based on an analysis of the top 20 highest frequency and 20 highest rate locations of crashes between 2014 and 2018. Table 4-3 presents the top roadway segments crash locations. In the 2020 CMP update process, new CMP strategies were identified and added to the existing strategies list based on the analysis conducted in the TSPR Baseline Condition Report, which identified causes and locations of congested corridors, and the TSPR and Action Plan Action Plan,10 which analyzed and identified congestion mitigation strategies for the specific corridors. A major addition to these congestion mitigation strategies involved safety strategies that included: • Signage and pavement markings (e.g., special emphasis crosswalks, yield/stop for pedestrian signs, advanced street signs) 10 https://www.colliermpo.org/wp-content/uploads/Action-Plan_V3-with- Appendices.pdf • Visibility and sightline improvements • New and upgraded street lighting • Traffic control devices (for example, left-turn signals, variable message signs, pedestrian hybrid beacons) • New and upgraded existing bicycle and pedestrian crossings The mapping analysis of crash data from 2014 to 2018 for the LRTP update is presented in Appendix C. The maps present total crash locations between 2014 to 2018, as well as crash locations where a fatality by vehicle, including a pedestrian, or bicyclist occurred. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-19 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-3. TSPR Top Road Segment Crash Locations (2014–2018) On Street From Street To Street Total Crashes Length (miles) AADT Crash Ratea Top 20 Crash Frequencyb or Rate Location Golden Gate Pkwy Santa Barbara Blvd. Collier Blvd. 559 2.21 27,496 5.048 Both I 75 Broward County Line SR 29 470 29.13 22,000 0.402 Frequency Airport Rd. Pine Ridge Rd. Orange Blossom Dr. 455 1.45 34,686 4.943 Both Tamiami Trail East Airport Rd. Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 453 1.69 47,814 3.074 Frequency Airport Rd. Radio Rd. Golden Gate Pkwy. 405 1.43 44,008 3.534 Both Immokalee Rd. I 75 Logan Blvd. 402 1.37 38,245 4.210 Both Tamiami Trail North Immokalee Rd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. 396 1.51 35,925 4.005 Both Golden Gate Blvd. Collier Blvd. Wilson Blvd. 381 5.03 25,481 1.630 Frequency I 75 SR 29 SR 951 366 21.23 24,970 0.378 Frequency Immokalee Rd. Livingston Rd. I 75 355 0.71 46,874 5.886 Both Pine Ridge Rd. Livingston Rd. I 75 351 0.95 52,322 3.869 Both I 75 Pine Ridge Rd. Immokalee Rd. 331 4.27 35,295 1.203 Frequency Immokalee Rd Logan Blvd. Collier Blvd. 331 1.94 89,362 1.048 Frequency Golden Gate Pkwy. Livingston Rd. I 75 293 2.05 42,756 1.835 Frequency Davis Blvd. Lakewood Blvd. County Barn Rd. 291 1.68 28,243 3.359 Frequency Airport Rd Golden Gate Pkwy. Pine Ridge Rd. 290 2.59 46,556 1.316 Frequency Tamiami Trail East Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. Treetops Dr. 280 2.45 37,428 1.674 Frequency I 75 Immokalee Rd. Lee County Line 278 3.06 99,582 0.501 Frequency 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-20 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-3. TSPR Top Road Segment Crash Locations (2014–2018) On Street From Street To Street Total Crashes Length (miles) AADT Crash Ratea Top 20 Crash Frequencyb or Rate Location Immokalee Rd. Collier Blvd. Wilson Blvd. 271 5.10 29,259 0.995 Frequency Tamiami Trail North 12th Ave N Goodlette Rd. S 269 1.66 51,500 1.727 Frequency Radio Rd. Livingston Rd. Santa Barbara Blvd. 250 1.99 18,398 3.742 Rate Santa Barbara Blvd. Golden Gate Pwky. Green Blvd. 215 1.71 20,314 3.391 Rate Airport Rd. Davis Blvd. North Rd. 198 0.52 43,551 4.819 Rate Collier Blvd. Golden Gate Pwky. Green Blvd. 177 1.04 27,271 3.420 Rate Pine Ridge Rd. Goodlette-Frank Road Shirley St. 165 0.67 36,418 3.733 Rate Immokalee Rd. Stockade Rd. SR 29 157 1.52 6,949 8.155 Rate Lake Trafford Rd. Carson Rd. SR 29 93 1.00 8,650 5.874 Rate Immokalee Drive N 29th St. Charlotte St. 91 1.97 6,200 4.074 Rate a Crash rate expressed as the number of crashes per 100 million vehicle miles of travel (AADT x Length) for the 5-year reporting period. b Frequency is defined as the number of crashes occurring within a specific jurisdiction, on a roadway segment, or at an intersection. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-21 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Transportation System Management and Operations The combination of technology and operational strategies is called TSM&O. These multimodal strategies are designed to maximize the efficiency, safety and use of existing and planned transportation infrastructure. TSM&O include Transportation System Management (TSM) approaches and ITS technologies that are noted in the Collier MPO Congestion Management Process 2017 Update (Adopted October 13, 2017)11 as effective strategies to mitigate congestion. TSM strategies are a low-cost but effective way to reduce congestion particularly for: • Intersection and signal improvements • Special events management strategies • Incident management ITS projects are effective in maximizing a transportation system’s efficiency. Based on the CMP 2017 Update, candidate ITS projects in Collier County include: • Those which are consistent with FDOT’s current ITS Regional Architecture • Updates to existing equipment and software deployed in the region • Improved incident management • Enhancements to City of Naples, Collier County Traffic Operations/Management Centers (TOCs), including studies and implementing their recommendations • Improved use of social media and public information technologies 11 https://www.colliermpo.org/wp-content/uploads/2017-CMP.pdf Further, the 2017 CMP Update noted the following ITS performance measures: • Maintaining concurrency with FDOT Regional ITS Architecture and technological advances in TOC equipment and operations • Increased number of signalized intersections connected to ITS • Improved Travel Time Reliability Within Collier MPO’s jurisdiction, both the City of Naples and Collier County manage TOCs in close coordination with each other and with FDOT to remain in full compliance with the FDOT Statewide ITS architecture. The 2020 CMP update identified several roadway facilities as candidates for ITS and active roadway management strategies. Figure 4-7 summarizes the projects and associated recommendations along with projects adopted in the current TIP. While these projects are part of the roadway needs, the LRTP- level modeling software (D1RPM) is not sensitive enough to determine if congestion is relieved through implementation of these strategies. Evaluation and prioritization of these projects is conducted by the MPO CMC using Strategy Evaluation Criteria that are used to screen project submittals for consistency with CMP goals, strategies, and congestion hotspots identified in the TSPR Baseline Condition Report (refer to Figure 4-6). 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-22 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Figure 4-7. 2019 and 2020 CMP ITS/Active Roadway Management Projects 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-23 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Both the Congestion Management Process and the bicycle/ pedestrian planning process strongly consider crash data as an important component of the project identification and selection process. As improvements are made to these facilities, special attention is placed on identifying solutions that enhance safety for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Traffic crashes are highly correlated with intersection locations, and consideration of operational and ITS improvements to major and minor intersections will address many of the high crash locations. Input from the LRTP into those continuing processes provides valuable guidance in the identification of safety-related improvements. Ranking the Roadway Needs Once a comprehensive list of the roadway project needs was developed, they were evaluated by scoring each project using defined goals and objectives, and the evaluation criteria described in Chapter 3. The evaluation provided a score for each project that was used to rank the needs projects from highest to lowest. During the process, adjustments were made to the rankings as more testing was done, or as information about projects schedules and commitments became known. Several projects were removed from the needs list and moved to the E+C category based on agency expectations that projects would be completed before the 2023–2045 planning timeframe. Projects were deleted if modeling indicated that they would not be beneficial. The following subsections provide further details on the evaluation criteria scoring presented in Chapter 3. Ad- ditionally, it describes other considerations when evaluating the projects including natural environment impacts and mitigation strategies, risks to the transportation system due to climate change, and future technology impacts to the transportation system including CAV. Environmental Considerations Transportation projects can significantly impact many aspects of the natural environment including wildlife and their habitats, wetlands, and groundwater resources. Where impacts cannot be completely avoided, impacts minimization, mitigation or conservation efforts are required. The Collier MPO is committed to principals of environmental stewardship and carefully examines potential impacts and mitigation efforts for each project under consideration. Environmental mitigation for transportation projects in Collier County is completed through a partnership between the Collier MPO, its member jurisdictions, FDOT, state and federal environmental resource and regulatory agencies, and environmental preservation organizations. Environmental mitigation is the process of addressing damage to the environment caused by transportation projects or programs. The process of mitigation is best accomplished through enhancement, restoration, creation, or preservation projects that help offset unavoidable environmental impacts. These activities are directed through Section 373, F.S., which establishes the requirements for mitigation planning as well as the requirements for permitting, mitigation banking, and mitigation requirements for habitat impacts. Impacts to habitat can be mitigated through a variety of options, which include mitigation banks and mitigation through the Water Management District(s) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-24 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-4 lists environmental mitigation strategies that are considered when addressing environmental impacts from future projects. Table 4-4. Mitigation Strategies Resource/Impacts Potential Mitigation Strategy Wetlands and Water Resources • Restore degraded wetlands • Create new wetland habitats • Enhance or preserve existing wetlands • Improve stormwater management • Purchase credits from a mitigation bank Forested and Natural Areas • Use selective cutting and clearing • Replace or restore forested areas • Preserve existing vegetation Habitats • Construct underpasses, such as culverts • Implement other design measures to minimize potential fragmenting of animal habitats Streams • Perform stream restoration • Create vegetative buffer zones • Enforce strict erosion and sedimentation control measures Threatened or Endangered Species • Preservation • Enhance or restore degraded habitat • Create new habitats • Establish buffer areas around existing habitat As part of the ranking process, an evaluation of the potential impacts to wildlife, habitat, and wetlands was conducted for each project in the needs network. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory database and their panther habitat maps served as a source to estimate the amount of environmental impacts for each project. Impacts to habitat and wetlands were reflected by giving a negative score for each impact, ranging from -1 (least negative impact) to -5 (most negative impact). Projects were scored based on their degree of impact to panther habitat and wetland impacts. The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Update Project Cost Development Methodology Technical Memorandum details how panther habitat and wetland impacts were estimated as well as the costs associated with potential mitigation. In addition to the process outlined in the Florida Statutes and implemented by the MPO and its partner agencies, the FDOT Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) process is used to seek input on individual qualifying long-range transportation projects allowing for more specific com- mentary. This ensures that mitigation opportunities are identified, considered, and available as the LRTP is developed and projects are advanced. The ETDM screening process was applied to all qualifying projects identified in the 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan, which further provided opportunity to engage on any sociocultural impacts as well. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-25 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Climate Change Vulnerability and Risks Southwest Florida contains the largest area of tidally influenced public lands in the Gulf of Mexico and the fastest growing urban landscape in Florida. Both the human and natural components of the ecosystem are under increasing risk because of the threats of a growing human population, sea level rise (SLR), and tropical cyclones. While all MPOs in Florida will be challenged with extreme change in weather events, each MPO’s challenge is unique. Changing conditions can include increased inland flooding, SLR, increased frequency of severe storms with high winds and greater rainfall, increased duration of droughts and rapidly spreading fires, and economic recessions. These conditions will lead to more rapid degradation and decreased functional operability (or lifespan) of transportation facilities. The Collier MPO along with its partnering agencies are considering the unique challenges they face to better plan for ways to protect and preserve their infrastructure. Federal Regulation 23 CFR 450.306(b)(9) requires MPOs, in cooperation with the state and public transportation operators, to “improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation” in the long-range transportation planning process. Planning for resilience involves considering objectives and strategies in other planning areas, as shown on Figure 4-8. 12 https://restoreactscienceprogram.noaa.gov/projects/local-coastal-tool Figure 4-8. Resiliency Planning Considerations Source: FDOT Resilience Quick Guide: Incorporating Resilience in the MPO Long Range Transportation Plan, January 2020 To better understand planning needs and potential actions to mitigate SLR, the County, City of Naples, City of Marco Island, and City of Everglades teamed with Florida Gulf Coast University and the University of Florida to sponsor a grant application from the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science [a subsidiary of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)] for a 3-year study and modeling exercise related to the impacts of SLR and storm surge on Collier County. The Board approved a Resolution of Support for the project on September 13, 2016, and the NOAA grant was awarded. The ACUNE project 12 began in June 2017 to 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-26 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan develop a decision-support tool to aid resource managers, municipalities, and agencies in Collier County with decisions related to the preservation and restoration of mangrove, marsh, and beach habitats; water management; and coastal planning, zoning, and land acquisition. However, the study was delayed because of the COVID-19 pandemic. A future LRTP update will include the results of the study and adjustments to the needs or cost feasible projects will be made accordingly. During the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update, the NOAA Sea Level Rise Viewer (version 3.0.0)13 tool was used to evaluate potential climate impacts to the Collier County transportation network. The viewer provides a preliminary look at SLR and coastal flooding impacts. The tool is for screening-level evaluations and uses best-available, nationally consistent data sets and analyses. The SLR viewer can be used at several scales to help estimate impacts and prioritize actions for different scenarios. While the data and maps provided by the tool illustrate the scale of potential flooding, the exact location of SLR and flooding is an estimate. For the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update, an intermediate high scenario was used to estimate SLR by 2045. Appendix C provides a map of potential SLR and coastal flooding by 2045. Projects that promote transportation infrastructure resiliency in the face of climate change and SLR were given a score of 5 if they were within 0.25 miles of potential 2045 flooding area and a score of 3 if they within 02.5 miles of a potential low lying area. 13 https://coast.noaa.gov/slr/#/layer/slr The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Transportation Network’s Vulnerability to Climate Change White Paper presents further details on climate change vulnerability and risk, estimation of SLR impacts, and possible mitigation strategies. Future Technology Considerations The FDOT Guidance for Assessing Planning Impacts and Opportunities of Automated, Connected, Electric and Shared-Use (ACES) Vehicles notes that Florida MPOs are dealing with an unprecedented amount of potential change as they plan for their transportation needs between now and 2045.14 Within their next planning horizon, MPOs need to decide how best to address the increasing deployment of ACES vehicles and complementary technologies. Because emerging technologies have the potential to completely transform conventional transportation practices, it is important to understand the potential benefits and drawbacks of the various technologies. The key benefit to these emerging technologies is the potential to improve safety by reducing injuries and fatalities resulting from human error and distractions. However, ACES technologies also introduce a great deal of unknowns, such as costs, social inequities, and new planning requirements that make navigating policy difficult. Table 4-5 presents potential positive and negative effects from these emerging technologies as noted in the FDOT ACES Guidance. 14 https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default- source/planning/policy/metrosupport/resources/fdot_mpoguidebook_201 81005.pdf?sfvrsn=7d194ed6_2 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-27 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-5. Potential Positive and Negative Effects Resulting from ACES Technologies Technology Potential Negative Effect(s) Potential Positive Effect(s) Automated Vehicles • Potential increase in VMT from empty vehicles • Changes in land use or urban form • Increased mobility for children, elderly or the disabled at potentially lower costs • Reduced parking demand • Changes in land use or urban form Connected Vehicles • Potential hacking of a transportation network • Potential increase in roadway capacities • New safety features • Improved congestion management Electric Vehicles • Decrease in transportation funding sources from reduction in motor fuel tax revenues • Potential reduction in air emissions (depending on energy sources used to generate electricity) Shared-Use Vehicles • Complete Street design challenges because of competition for limited curb space in urban areas • Opportunities for mobility hubs and new funding sources The Florida Connected Vehicle Initiative includes multiple planning, design/implementation, and operational connected vehicle projects throughout the state.15 While there are currently no projects or initiatives in Collier County, there is 15 https://www.fdot.gov/traffic/its/projects-deploy/cv/connected-vehicles one project in neighboring Lee County: US 41 Florida’s Regional Advanced Mobility Elements (FRAME). The project is in the initial phases. The overall goal is to improve efficient operations of the traffic signals along the corridor, thereby improving mobility as well as provide information for connected vehicles. The project covers approximately 30 miles and 71 traffic signals and includes the following initiatives: • Traffic signal controllers/cabinets upgrades • Connected Vehicle Road Side Units deployment • Pedestrian detection using LIDAR16 detectors • Deployment of Automated Traffic Signal Performance Measures Considering that US 41 continues into Collier County, the Collier MPO is considering expansion of the US 41 FRAME project into the County. The project would benefit drivers commuting between Lee and Collier Counties by improving mobility and safety along the US 41 Corridor. For the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP update, one CAV planning scenario was modeled by FDOT. FDOT coordinated with the University of South Florida’s CUTR to determine the capacity adjustments to the model to simulate a CAV fleet. Based on that coordination, a CAV planning scenario assumed 35 per- cent of the vehicles on the network were CAV. The output resulted in minor capacity improvements to the overall network. 2045 Roadway Needs Results Figure 4-9 and Table 4-6 identify the 2045 roadway needs projects which total to more than $2.4 billion. The evaluation matrix for the ranking of the needs is presented in Appendix D. 16 Light Detection and Ranging 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-28 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Figure 4-9. 2045 Needs Plan Project Map 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-29 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 1 51 Benfield Rd. Extension The Lords Way City Gate Blvd. N Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 2 41 Benfield Rd. US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) Rattlesnake Hammock Extension Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 3 72 Big Cypress Pkwy. Green Blvd. Golden Gate Blvd. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 4 70 Big Cypress Pkwy. Golden Gate Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 5 71 Big Cypress Pkwy. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension Oil Well Rd. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 6 82 Big Cypress Pkwy. Oil Well Rd. Immokalee Rd. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 7 62 Camp Keais Rd. Pope John Paul Blvd. Oil Well Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 8 80 Camp Keais Rd. Immokalee Rd. Pope John Paul Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 9 1 Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Golden Gate Main Canal Green Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Four to Six Lanes 10 21 CR 951 Extension Collier Blvd. (CR 951) (northern terminus) Lee/Collier County Line Roadway Capacity New 2-Lane Road 11 34 Everglades Blvd. Randall Blvd. South of Oil Well Road Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-30 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 12 35 Everglades Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension Randall Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 13 54 Everglades Blvd. Golden Gate Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 14 63 Everglades Blvd. I-75 (SR-93) Golden Gate Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 15 37 Golden Gate Blvd. Everglades Blvd. Desoto Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 16 58 Golden Gate Blvd. Extension Desoto Blvd. Big Cypress Pkwy. Roadway Capacity New Four-Lane Road 17 31 Goodlette-Frank Rd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Immokalee Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 18 66 Green Blvd. Santa Barbara Blvd./ Logan Blvd. Sunshine Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 19 27 Green Boulevard Extension (16th Ave. SW) 23rd St. SW Wilson Blvd. Extension Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane (Future Study Area) 20 33 Green Boulevard Extension (16th Ave. SW) Collier Blvd. (CR 951) 23rd St. SW Roadway Capacity New Four-Lane (Future Study Area) 21 42 Green Boulevard Extension (16th Ave. SW) Wilson Blvd. Ext Everglades Blvd. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road 22 60 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange Everglades Blvd. Interchange New Interchange 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-31 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 23 8 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange (modified) Golden Gate Pkwy. Interchange Interchange Improvement 24 2 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange (modified) Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Interchange Interchange Improvement 25 22 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange (modified) Immokalee Rd. Interchange Interchange improvement (DDI proposed) 26 18 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange (modified) Pine Ridge Rd. Interchange Interchange improvement (DDI proposed) 27 40 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange (new) Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Interchange New Interchange - Partial (to/from the north) 29 5 I-75 (SR-93) Managed (Toll) Lanes Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Collier/Lee County Line Roadway Capacity New Ten-Lane Express (Toll) Lanes 30 7 Immokalee Rd. (CR 846) Camp Keais Rd. Carver St. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 31 23 CR 846 E SR 29 Airpark Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 32 81 Keane Ave. Inez Rd. Wilson Blvd. Extension Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Future Study Area) 33 50 Little League Rd. Extension SR 82 Westclox St. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road 34 65 Logan Blvd. Green Blvd. Pine Ridge Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Four to Six Lanes 35 52 Logan Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Immokalee Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-32 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 36 67 Logan Blvd. Pine Ridge Rd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 37 38 Oil Well Road/ CR 858 Everglades Blvd. Oil Well Grade Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Six Lanes 38 46 Oil Well Road/ CR 858 Ave Maria Entrance Camp Keais Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Six Lanes 39 10 Old US 41 US 41 (Tamiami Trail E) Lee/Collier County Line Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 40 45 Orange Blossom Drive Airport Pulling Rd. Livingston Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 41A 19 Randall Blvd. Intersection (flyover) Immokalee Rd. Interchange Ultimate Intersection Improvement: Overpass 41B 36 Randall Blvd. Immokalee Rd. 8th St. NE Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Six Lanes 42 39 Randall Blvd. 8th St. NE Everglades Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Six Lanes 43 59 Randall Blvd. Everglades Blvd. Desoto Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 44 61 Randall Blvd. Desoto Blvd. Big Cypress Pkwy. Roadway Capacity New Four-Lane Road 45 44 Santa Barbara Blvd. Painted Leaf Ln. Green Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Four to Six Lanes 46 56 SR 29 SR 82 Collier/Hendry Line Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-33 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 48 49 SR 29 I-75 (SR 93) Oil Well Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 50 24 SR 29 New Market Road North/Westclox Street North of SR 82 Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 51 13 SR 29/New Market Rd. W (New Road) CR 846 E New Market Rd. N Roadway Capacity New Four-Lane Road 52 3 SR 29 Agriculture Way CR 846 E Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 53 15 SR 29 Sunniland Nursery Rd. Agriculture Way Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 54 16 SR 29 Oil Well Rd. Sunniland Nursery Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 55 6 SR 84 (Davis Blvd.) Airport Pulling Rd. Santa Barbara Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Four to Six Lanes 56 9 Collier Blvd. (SR 951) South of Manatee Rd. North of Tower Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Four to Six Lanes 57 4 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersection Goodlette Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 58 12 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) Greenway Rd. 6 L Farm Rd Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 59 11 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersection Collier Blvd. (SR 951) Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-34 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 60 14 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) Immokalee Rd. Old US 41 Corridor Study Further Study Required 62A 73 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension 16th St. Everglades Blvd. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 62B 73 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension Everglades Blvd. Big Cypress Pkwy. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 63 53 Westclox Street Extension Little League Rd. West of Carson Rd. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road 64 30 Wilson Blvd. Golden Gate Blvd. Immokalee Rd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 65 32 Wilson Blvd. Keane Ave. Golden Gate Blvd. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road (Expandable to Four Lanes) 66 17 Immokalee Rd. (Intersection) Livingston Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 67 57 Veterans Memorial Blvd. Extension Strand Blvd. I-75 Roadway Capacity New Four-Lane Road 68 83 Big Cypress Pkwy. Intersection (new) Oil Well Grade Rd. Minor Intersection Improvement New At-Grade Intersection 70 68 Green Blvd. Extension Everglades Blvd. Big Cypress Pkwy. Roadway Capacity New Two-Lane Road 73 20 Immokalee Rd. (CR 846) Intersection Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-35 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 74 28 Immokalee Rd. (CR 846) Intersection Wilson Blvd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 75 55 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange (new) Veterans Memorial Blvd. Interchange New Partial Interchange 76 43 Vanderbilt Dr. Immokalee Rd. Woods Edge Pkwy. Roadway Capacity Widen from Two to Four Lanes 77 25 Pine Ridge Rd. Intersection Livingston Rd. Minor Intersection Improvement Minor intersection improvements 78 29 Golden Gate Pkwy. Intersection Livingston Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 81 74 Bridge @ 47th Ave NE West of Everglades Blvd. New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 82 75 Bridge @ Wilson Blvd. South of 33rd Avenue NE New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 83 69 Bridge @ 18th Ave. NE Between Wilson Blvd. N and 8th St. NE New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 84 76 Bridge @ 18th Ave NE Between 8th St. NE and 16th St. NE New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 85 64 Bridge @ 13th St. NW North Terminus at Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 86 77 Bridge @ 16th St. SE South Terminus New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-36 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 87 77 Bridge @ Location TBD - between 10th Ave. SE and 20th Ave. SE East of Everglades Blvd. New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 88 48 Bridge @Wilson Blvd. S South Terminus New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 89 79 Bridge @ 62nd Ave NE West of 40th St NE New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 115 N/A Bridge @ 23rd St. SW South of Golden Gate Blvd. New Bridge Project New Bridge over Canal 90 26 Pine Ridge Rd. Logan Blvd. Collier Blvd. Roadway Capacity Widen from Four to Six Lanes 93 N/A Immokalee Rd. Shady Hollow Blvd. E Rural Village Rd. (new) Roadway Capacity Widen from Two Four Lanes 94 N/A Rural Village Rd. (new) Immokalee Rd. Immokalee Rd. Roadway Capacity New Four-Lane Road 95 N/A Golden Gate Pkwy. (Intersection) Goodlette Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 96 N/A Pine Ridge Rd. (Intersection) Airport Pulling Rd. Minor Intersection Improvement Minor intersection improvements 97 N/A Immokalee Rd. (Intersection) Logan Blvd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-37 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 98 N/A Vanderbilt Beach Rd. (Intersection) Livingston Rd. Minor Intersection Improvement Minor intersection improvements 99 N/A Vanderbilt Beach Rd. (Intersection) Logan Blvd. Minor Intersection Improvement Minor intersection improvements 100 N/A Collier Blvd. (Intersection) Pine Ridge Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 101 N/A Pine Ridge Rd. (Intersection) Goodlette Rd. Minor Intersection Improvement Minor intersection improvements 102 N/A US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersection Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 103 N/A US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersection Pine Ridge Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 104 N/A US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) intersection Golden Gate Pkwy. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 105 N/A Santa Barbara Blvd. Green Blvd. Minor Intersection Improvement Minor intersection improvements 106 N/A Immokalee Rd. Northbrook Dr. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-38 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-6. 2045 Needs Plan List of Projects Map ID Needs Ranking Project From To Type of Project Description 107 N/A Golden Gate Pkwy. Collier Blvd. Major Intersection Improvement Major Intersection Improvement 108 N/A Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Airport Pulling Rd. Minor Intersection Improvement Intersection Innovation/Improvements 109 N/A Immokalee Rd. Goodlette-Frank Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Intersection Innovation/Improvements 110 N/A Immokalee Rd. Airport Pulling Rd. Major Intersection Improvement Intersection Innovation/Improvements 111 N/A US 41 Immokalee Rd. Minor Intersection Improvement Intersection Innovation/Improvements 112 N/A Airport Pulling Rd. Orange Blossom Dr. Minor Intersection Improvement Intersection Innovation/Improvements 113 N/A Airport Pulling Rd. Golden Gate Pkwy. Minor Intersection Improvement Intersection Innovation/Improvements 114 N/A Airport Pulling Rd. Radio Rd. Minor Intersection Improvement Intersection Innovation/Improvements 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-39 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan 4-3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs Pathways that consist of pedestrian and bicycle facilities are an important part of the County’s transportation network. They facilitate access to public transportation and provide alternative mobility choices. In 2019, the Collier MPO and BPAC developed a Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) that addresses pedestrian and bicycle needs.17 The products of the BPAC are included in the LRTP by reference and are sum- marized in this subsection. The BPMP establishes policies for including bicycle and pedestrian facilities along all collector and arterial roads, formalizes the applicability of the Design Guidelines, adopts FDOT’s Complete Streets policy, identifies high priority Complete Streets Corridors, and establishes MPO priorities for funding improvements. The policies also commit MPO staff to reporting to the MPO Board on performance measures and targets on an annual basis. Vision Goals and Objectives The BPMP Goals and Strategies were developed by reviewing local, state, and national best practices and goals in similar plans including the Collier MPO 2012 Comprehensive Pathways Plan. The 2019 BPMP is similar to the 2012 Comprehensive Pathways Plan but places greater emphasis on safety, equity, and community health. The goals became the basis for the development of strategies, policies, and project prioritization criteria and are as follows: • Safety. Increase safety for people who walk and bicycle in the County. 17 https://www.colliermpo.org/bp-master-plan/ • Connectivity. Create a network of efficient, convenient bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the County. • Equity/Livability. Increase transportation choice and community livability through development of an integrated multimodal system. • Health. Increase total miles of bicycle and pedestrian facilities and encourage local governments to incorporate Complete Streets principles in road planning, design, and operations. • Economy. Promote tourism and economic opportunities by developing a safe, connected network of biking and walking facilities. • Environment. Protect the environment by promoting walking and bicycling for transportation to reduce congestion, reduce the need for costly expansion of road and highway systems, and reduce our nation’s dependence on foreign energy sources. To address the issue of equity in terms of providing equal access to bicycle and pedestrian facilities countywide, the MPO’s previous identification of Environmental Justice (EJ) communities was updated. The EJ criteria used for the BPMP were minority status, poverty, no access to a vehicle, and limited ability to speak English. EJ community areas were defined as areas where the criteria were 10 percent greater than the County average. Appendix C presents the EJ Community Area map. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-40 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Identification of Network Needs The BPMP developed bicycle and pedestrian priorities by first identifying gaps and needs on collector and arterial roads in the region using the following six-step identification process: 1.Plans Review – Review of plans and documents that address bicycle and pedestrian issues and opportunities. 2.Inventories – The Collier MPO entered into an agreement with the Naples Pathway Coalition (NPC) during the development of the BPMP to develop a joint bicycle facilities map in partnership with NPC and the City of Naples Community Services Department. Additionally, the Collier MPO’s 2017 bicycle and pedestrian facilities inventory maps were reviewed and commented on by local agencies, stakeholders, and the community through an extensive public outreach effort, resulting in multiple revisions of the map. The joint map was completed and published in November 2018. Going forward, NPC agreed to serve as the recipient of comments regarding the joint map’s accuracy, and the Collier MPO agreed to maintain and update the associated geographic information system (GIS) files on an as-needed basis. 3.Public Input - The Collier MPO posted an interactive map on its website that generated nearly 400 comments. Comments were used to develop an overlay map for project review. 4.Crash and Environmental Justice Community Data – An analysis of crash data indicated concentrated bicycle and pedestrian crashes near land uses related to tourism and services or in relation to EJ community areas. The combination of these two factors—bicycle and pedestrian crash clusters and EJ communities—proved to be a useful marker for the needs of low-income, minority, and immigrant populations. 5.Network Configuration - Collier MPO staff worked closely with the MPO advisory committees and agency staff and considered public comment in the process of articulating design and planning policies related to roadways. 6.Gap and Needs Analysis - Using GIS data, the needs analysis included overlaying the collected data, public input, and draft policies to identify missing links and segment deficiencies in the bicycle/pedestrian network. Throughout the process, monthly updates on the needs were provided to the advisory committees and stakeholders beginning in the fall 2018, which led to further refinement of the prioritization criteria, and thus the list of needs. The needs analysis identified 74 miles of roadway lacking any type of bicycle or pedestrian facility and 150 miles of roadway lacking sufficient bicycle facilities. Table 4-7 lists the bicycle and pedestrian network gaps and facility needs. Appendix C includes a map from the BPMP showing bicycle and pedestrian facility gaps overlapped with public comments. Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Once the needs were identified, the BPMP’s goals and objectives served as the prioritization criteria to develop a list of prioritized bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Table 4-8 presents the list of bicycle and pedestrian priorities. The segments identified totaled 66 miles. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-41 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-7. Network Gaps/Facility Needs Source: Collier MPO BPMP Type of Gap in Bicycle Network Mileage of Missing Facilities All Gaps on Collector & Arterial Roadways Gaps Meeting Equity Criteriona Gaps Meeting Safety Criterion Gaps Meeting Equity and Safety Criteria No facility 73.9 22.9 2.4 0.0 Insufficient facility 150.3 44.5 13.1 5.8 Paved shoulderb 85.3 26.0 1.7 1.3 Connector sidewalkb 65.0 18.5 11.4 4.5 Total miles 224.2 67.4 15.5 5.8 a Equity criterion established as block groups receiving a medium, high, or very high ranking from the Composite Equity Analysis. b Paved shoulder/ connector sidewalk are sub-categories of Insufficient Facility total. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-42 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Table 4-7. Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Source: Collier MPO BPMP Road From To Distance Agency Facility Type 111th Ave. N Vanderbilt Dr. Tamiami Trl. N 1.0 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Airport Rd. N Pine Ridge Rd. Immokalee Rd. 4.2 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Airport Rd. N S Horseshoe Dr. Pinewoods Cir. 2.5 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Airport Rd. S Seagrape Ave. Davis Blvd. 0.5 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Airport Rd. S Davis Blvd. Tamiami Trl. E 0.8 Collier County Safety Bluebill Ave. Bluebill Ave. Vanderbilt Dr. 0.4 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Bonita Beach Rd. Vanderbilt Dr. 1.7 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Castaways St. Saturn Ct. Amazon Ct. 0.2 Marco Island Marco Master Plan Collier Blvd. 17th Ave. SW City Gate Blvd. N 2.0 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Collier Blvd. N End Jolley Bridge Fiddlers Creek Pkwy. 3.6 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Copeland Ave. S Broadway Oyster Bar Ln. 0.7 Everglades City Pathway Davis Blvd. Tamiami Trl. Airport Rd. S 1.0 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Everglades Blvd. Oil Well Rd. 58TH AVE NE 3.1 Collier County Sidewalk Golden Gate Pkwy. 9th St. N Estuary Blvd. 1.6 Naples Bike Lane/Path Greenbrier St. Manor Ter. Saturn Ct. 0.2 Marco Island Marco Master Plan Immokalee Rd. Tamiami Trl. Northbrooke Dr. 4.0 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Logan Blvd. N Logan Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. 1.1 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Logan Blvd. S Logan Blvd. Green Blvd. 2.0 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Oil Well Rd. Everglades Blvd. N Oil Well Grade Rd. 3.9 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Oil Well Rd. Ave Maria Blvd. SR 29 5.7 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Old US 41 N Tamiami Trl. Performance Way 1.5 Collier County Pathway Peru St. Seagrape Dr. 0.1 Marco Island Marco Master Plan Pine Ridge Rd. Tamiami Trl. Logan Blvd. S 5.1 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Randall Blvd. Randall Blvd. Approach Blvd. 1.5 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Rattlesnake H Rd. Valley Stream Dr. Collier Blvd. 3.5 Collier County Bike Lane/Path San Marco Rd. Goodland Dr. Tamiami Trl. E 6.5 Collier County Pathway Santa Barbara Blvd. Green Blvd. 17th Ave. SW 0.2 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Saturn Ct. Castaways St. Greenbrier St. 0.1 Marco Island Marco Master Plan Seagrape Dr. Peru St. Swallow Ave. 0.7 Marco Island Marco Master Plan Tamiami Trl. E Greenway Rd. Six LS Farm Rd. 2.5 Collier County Pathway Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Gulfshore Dr. Vanderbilt Dr. 0.4 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Wiggins Pass Rd. Vanderbilt Dr. Tamiami Trl. N 1.0 Collier County Bike Lane/Path Wilson Blvd. N Golden Gate Blvd 24th Ave. NE 3.0 Collier County Pathway Total Miles 66.3 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-43 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan Shared-Use Nonmotorized (SUN) Trail Alignments and Spine Pathway Corridors Managed by the FDEP Office of Greenways and Trails, the SUN Trail program funds non-motorized, paved, shared-use trails that are part of the Florida Greenways and Trails System Priority Trail. Appendix C includes the SUN Trail Alignments and Spine Pathway Corridors map, which shows the two SUN Trail alignments and other interconnected spine pathway corridors within Collier County that form an integrated, high- priority pathway network. The BPMP identified the following as priority projects to complete the SUN Trail network.18 Further details on each project is provided in the BPMP. • SUN Trail Alignments • FPL Easement/Livingston/Rich King Greenway Alignment • Gordon River Greenway Connections • Golden Gate Canal Greenway (Proposed) • Golden Gate Parkway between Santa Barbara and Collier Boulevards • SR 29 and SR 82 Existing Plus Proposed Facilities Additional needs analysis included examining the 2040 LRTP roadway projects, as roadway enhancement projects provide an excellent opportunity to cost-effectively expand the bicycle and pedestrian network. Appendix C includes the Existing Plus Proposed Facilities map, which provides a visual summary of 18 https://www.fdot.gov/planning/systems/SUNTrail.shtm the project priorities for major roadways and the Spine Trail network. Local and Residential Roads Since the 2040 LRTP update, the Collier MPO completed the Golden Gate City Walkable Community Study to develop a prioritized list of sidewalk and pedestrian amenity projects that would promote and enhance walkability, bicycle use, transit use, and social equity throughout the community. Projects were scored based on proximity to crashes, schools, commercial destinations, parks, and transit, and public input. Projects were then ranked in tiers based on their current condition and greatest value to the public: • Tier 1 Projects were given the highest priority based on their benefit to the community • Tier 2 Projects are instrumental in completing a continuous sidewalk network throughout the community. • Tier 3 Projects will enhance overall walkability within the community The results of the study demonstrated a significant need for sidewalk infrastructure in Golden Gate City. Local Agency Priorities on Local Roads Adopted local agency plans are incorporated into the BPMP by reference. Key priorities are summarized as follows. Naples The Naples Downtown Circulation and Connectivity Plan identifies bicycle and pedestrian improvements to the Gordon River Bridge (5th Avenue S) as a priority for the region as it is the hub of the SUN Trail and Spine Corridor Network. The 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-44 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan project design calls for narrowing the existing travel lanes, eliminating the shoulder, and moving the existing barrier to provide a 14-foot-wide shared-use path on each side of the bridge. Everglades City Everglades City has identified four sidewalks projects as part of their priority needs along Copeland Avenue, Datura Street, Broadway, and Collier Avenue. Immokalee Urban Area The Immokalee Walkable Community Study identified SR 29 and SR 82 as critical components of the Spine Trail Network for Collier County. Additionally, the Immokalee CRA requested to extend bicycle and pedestrian facilities along Lake Trafford Road to the lake as part of the Spine Trail priority. Marco Island Top priorities from Marco Island’s Bike Path Master Plan include: •Collier Boulevard – alternate bike lanes (Landmark extension) •Bald Eagle Drive – bike lanes (Collier to San Marco) 4-4 Transit Needs Pending completion of the Transit Development Plan 4-5 Air Transportation Needs Within the Collier MPO jurisdiction are four publicly owned airports: 19 https://flynaples.com/about/ •Naples Municipal Airport •Immokalee Regional Airport •Marco Island Executive Airport •Everglades Airpark The Collier County Airport Authority, which is a branch of the local government overseen by the Collier County BCC, oversees the development and management of the airports in Immokalee, Marco Island, and Everglades City. The City of Naples Airport Authority is charged with the operation, development, and improvements of the Naples Airport. The closest international airport to the Collier County area is the Southwest Florida International Airport, which is located to the north in Fort Myers in Lee County. Naples Airport Naples Airport is located in the City of Naples and is bounded by Corporate Flight Drive to the north, North Road to the south, Airport Pulling Road to the east, and the Gordon River to the west. Public access to the airport is at the intersection of Radio Road and Airport Pulling Road. In Fiscal Year 2019, there were 112,800 takeoffs and landings. The airport typically houses 308 aircraft, which significantly increases during the seasonal months.19 There is no regularly scheduled passenger service at this airport. However, it maintains a Title 14 CFR, Part 139 Airport Operating Certificate to accommodate both scheduled and unscheduled operations. According to the Naples Airport Master Plan,20 in 2017 the airport operated at 56 percent capacity and is forecasted to operate at 84 percent capacity by 2038. The airport master plan includes capital 20 https://flynaples.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/APF-MP- Consolidated-Draft-Report-February-29-2020.pdf 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 4-45 Chapter 4 2045 Needs Plan improvements through 2039. There are no plans to expand the airport. The roadway project needs include intersection improvements at Airport Pulling Road and Radio Road to accommodate future airport operations. Immokalee Regional Airport The Immokalee Regional Airport is situated on 1,333 acres and is bordered by Immokalee Road to the south and Airway Road to the west. Airpark Boulevard provides public access to the airport. As discussed earlier, this airport has been designated for a 60-acre Foreign Trade Zone, which includes portions of the Florida Tradeport Industrial Park. The industrial park covers 400 acres and is accessed by Airpark Boulevard. The airport also includes the Immokalee Regional Raceway (International Hot Rod Association Drag Strip) and is used for aerial firefighting and crop dusting operations. The Immokalee Regional Airport, Airport Layout Plan Update, 2017 21 notes that the airport operations are expected to grow through 2037 requiring some airfield improvements. The roadway project needs include widening Immokalee Road from SR 29 to Airpark Boulevard to accommodate future airport operations. 21 Immokalee Regional Airport, Airport Layout Plan Update Marco Island Executive Airport The Marco Island Executive airport is located 12 miles south of downtown Naples and has one runway that measures 5,000 feet. The airport can accommodate smaller general aviation aircraft as well as business jets. Everglades Airpark The Everglades Airpark is situated on 29 acres and is located immediately southwest of the Big Cypress National Preserve and is surrounded on three sides by the waters of the Everglades National Park. The Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve and Collier Seminole Park are to the north. The airpark primarily supports recreational flying, environmental patrol, and flight training. It includes one 2,400-foot-long runway and is considered Collier County’s Eco-tourism Airport. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Chapter 5 – Financial Resources September 2020 Reviewed by TAC/CAC 9/28/209.C.1Packet Pg. 359Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan i Chapter 5 Financial Resources Contents Chapter 5 Financial Resources ................................................................................................................................................................. 5-1 5-1 Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5-2 Roadway and Transit Revenue Projections ............................................................................................................................. 5-2 5-3 Roadway and Transit Federal/State Funding ........................................................................................................................... 5-2 5-4 Local Revenue Projections and Sources ................................................................................................................................... 5-4 5-5 Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Sources .................................................................................................................................. 5-4 Table Table 5-1. 2045 LRTP Revenue Projections ............................................................................................................................................. 5-3 Table 5-2. Federal and State Revenue Projections (YOE) ........................................................................................................................ 5-5 Figure Figure 5-1. Planning Periods Summary (Revenue Bands) ........................................................................................................................ 5-1 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 5-1 Chapter 5 Financial Resources Chapter 5 Financial Resources The Collier 2045 LRTP financial plan establishes the basis for determining how many Needs Assessment projects can be included in the Cost Feasible Plan. The financial plan recognizes all revenues by source that can reasonably be expected to be available during the planning period. The available revenues and planning-level cost estimates are applied to each project from the Needs Assessment to develop the Cost Feasible Plan. 5-1 Overview Ensuring that the financial resources will be available to fund the multimodal transportation projects by 2045 is an important element of the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP. The premise of the long-range revenue forecast is rooted in federal regulation originally required by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. All transportation acts since that time have continued the requirement for a financial plan. Consistent with the most recent requirements of 23 U.S. Code §134, the revenues identified for this LRTP update are 1 https://www.mpoac.org/ reasonably expected to be available to implement the adopted 2045 LRTP. This chapter summarizes transportation revenues available to fund multimodal transportation projects within the County and its municipalities through 2045. This chapter further documents the assumptions used to develop the future revenues. In accordance with federal statutes, FDOT in coordination with the Florida Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC)1 provides long-range revenue forecasts to assist Florida MPOs. These forecasts help MPOs comply with federal requirements for developing cost feasible transporta- tion plans and demonstrate a coordinated planning effort for transportation facilities and services in Florida. As shown on Figure 5-1, financial planning for statewide and metropolitan transportation plans is typically required for three periods: long range (20 or more years), intermediate range (10 to 15 years), and short range (5 years). As noted in the FDOT Revenue Forecasting Guidebook,2 long-range revenue and program forecasts are general in nature to 2 https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default- source/content/planning/revenueforecast/revenue-forecasting- guidebook.pdf Figure 5-1. Planning Periods Summary (Revenue Bands) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 5-2 Chapter 5 Financial Resources encourage a variety of approaches and technologies to meet the goals and objectives. The revenues and ultimately the cost feasible project costs in this LRTP update are shown in year of expenditure (YOE) dollars to reflect inflation. Federal guidance [23 C.F.R. 450.324(F)(11)] notes that revenue and cost estimates must use an inflation rate to reflect the YOE dollars. The YOE represents the value of money at the time it will be collected. The YOE dollars is based on reasonable financial principles and information, and is developed in cooperation between the MPO, state, and public transportation operator(s). The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Revenue Projections Technical Memorandum describes each revenue source, revenue forecasting assumptions, and the methodology for developing statewide estimates of federal and state revenues (refer to Appendix E). 5-2 Roadway and Transit Revenue Projections Revenue projections include federal, state, and county sources. The County and its municipalities have historically funded transportation projects using local sources, such as fuel taxes, impact fees, and general fund transfers (ad valorem) in addition to federal and state revenues. Except for general fund transfers (which are projected to only support operations and maintenance [O&M]), it is assumed that the County and it municipalities will continue to use these revenue sources to fund transportation projects from 2026 through 2045. Table 5-1 summarizes the total projected 3 MAP-21 is the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, which was signed into law on July 6, 2012, by President Obama. revenues in YOE dollars that are anticipated to be available for the 2045 LRTP. 5-3 Roadway and Transit Federal/State Funding Projections of federal and state roadway and transit revenues for use in LRTPs are developed by FDOT. FDOT’s 2045 Revenue Forecast for the Collier MPO provides federal and state funds for the Collier MPO to use in developing its forecasted revenues. These revenues are for capacity and non-capacity programs consistent with statewide priorities. Table 5-2 highlights these revenue amounts in YOE format as required by MAP-21.3 The following provides a brief description of each revenue source (Appendix E provides further details). • Transportation Management Area: Additional federal funds are distributed to an urban area that has a population greater than 200,000 (known as a TMA), as designated by the U.S. Census Bureau following the 2010 Census. • Transportation Alternatives Program: Created as a new funding program under current federal transportation legislation (MAP-21), the Transportation Alternatives Program combines three previous programs— Transportation Enhancements, Safe Routes to School, and Recreational Trails Program. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 5-3 Chapter 5 Financial Resources Table 5-1. 2045 LRTP Revenue Projections Jurisdiction Funding Source Total 2026–2045 (YOE) Revenues Dedicated to Transit Operations Federal Transit Operations $31,569,454 State Transit Operations $30,359,843 Local Transit Operations $139,551,338 Fares Transit Operations $41,114,918 Local Transportation Disadvantaged $6,607,296 Subtotal for Transit Operations $249,202,849 Revenues Dedicated to Transit Capital Projects Federal Transit Capital $68,623,268 Federal & State Transit Capital $2,526,514 State Transit Capital $0 Local Transit Capital $17,436,545 Subtotal for Transit Capital Projects $88,586,327 Total Transit Revenues $337,789,176 Revenues Dedicated to Operations and Maintenance (Roadway) County General Fund (Ad Valorem) $240,000,000 County Fuel Tax (48% of $375.53 Million Net Revenues) $180,254,444 Total Operations and Maintenance (Roadway) $420,254,444 Revenues Remaining for Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Projects (Roadway) Federal Transportation Alternatives Program $6,760,000 Federal Transportation Management Area $100,360,000 State Strategic Intermodal System $337,404,000 State Other Arterial and Construction & ROW $443,200,000 County Transportation Impact Fees $346,275,729 County Fuel Tax (52% of $375.53 Million Net Revenues) $195,275,648 County General Fund (Ad Valorem) $0 County Sales Tax Referendum $0 Total for Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Projects (Roadway) $1,429,275,377 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 5-4 Chapter 5 Financial Resources • Strategic Intermodal System: The SIS capacity program provides funds for construction, improvements, and associated ROW acquisition on the State Highway System (SHS) roadways that are designated as part of SIS. • Other Arterial Construction/ROW: This capacity program provides funds for construction, improvements, and associated ROW acquisition on SHS roadways that are not designated as part of SIS. • Transportation Regional Incentive Program: TRIP was established as part of the state’s major growth management legislation enacted with Senate Bill 360. The program is intended to encourage regional planning by providing matching funds for improvements to regionally significant transportation facilities identified and prioritized by regional partners. • Federal and State Transit Revenues: Estimates of federal and state transit revenues are based on information provided in the FDOT Revenue Forecasting Guidebook. 5-4 Local Revenue Projections and Sources In addition to federal and state funding, local revenue sources help build and maintain the transportation network within the County and its municipalities. The following text briefly describes each County funding element (Appendix E provides further details). • Transportation Impact Fees: Transportation impact fees provide revenue for financing the addition and expansion of roadway facilities needed to accommodate specific new growth and development. • Fuel Taxes: Fuel taxes represent a major portion of Collier County’s local transportation revenues. Fuel tax revenue is dedicated to both transportation capacity expansion and maintenance and operations. Fuel taxes collected by the cities within the County were not considered during the LRTP. • General Fund/Ad Valorem: In the past, the County has used General Fund revenues to help fund capacity expansion and debt service, but with recent constraints placed on this fund, fuel taxes have been shifted into that role. While taxable values help stabilize the revenues, the County will continue to assign General Fund revenues to non-capacity roadway improvements. • Sales Tax: A 2018 1-cent infrastructure sales surtax that is assigned to a variety of projects including transportation infrastructure. 5-5 Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Sources Similar to roadway and transit funding sources, there are multiple funding sources for bicycle and pedestrian projects. The primary funding sources available for bicycle and pedestrian projects presented in the BPMP are through federal programs, as discussed in the following text. • National Highway Performance Program: These funds were established under MAP-21 and provide support for projects or program projects that are on an eligible facility or an eligible activity that supports national performance goals. Bicycle and pedestrian improvements associated with a National Highway System facility are eligible. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 5-5 Chapter 5 Financial Resources Table 5-2. Federal and State Revenue Projections (YOE) Jurisdiction Funding Source 2026–2030 2031–2035 2036–2045 Total 2026–2045 Federal Transportation Alternatives (Urban Area) $1,690,000 $1,690,000 $3,380,000 $6,760,000 Federal Transportation Management Area $25,090,000 $25,090,000 $50,180,000 $100,360,000 State and Federal Other Arterial/Construction & ROW $100,620,000 $110,540,000 $232,040,000 $443,200,000 State Transportation Regional Incentive Program $3,924,000 $4,368,000 $8,952,000 $17,244,000 State and Federal Transit $46,240,000 $50,640,000 $105,500,000 $202,380,000 Total Revenues $177,564,000 $192,328,000 $400,052,000 $769,944,000 Jurisdiction Funding Source 2026–2030 2031–2045 Total 2026–2045 Federal Strategic Intermodal System $38,622,000 $298,782,000 $337,404,000 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 5-6 Chapter 5 Financial Resources • Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Program: The STBG Program provides the most flexible funding among all federal-aid transportation programs. Specifically, the STBG-Transportation Alternatives provides funding for programs and projects defined as transportation alternatives. • Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP): This program provides funds to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, including non-state- owned public roads and roads on tribal lands and can be used for pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements. States may obligate funds under HSIP to carry out any highway safety improvement project on any public road or publicly owned bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trails. • Recreational Trails Program: This federally funded competitive grant program provides financial assistance to city, county, state, or federal governments; organizations approved by the state; or state- and federally recognized Indian tribal governments, for the development of recreational trails, trailheads, and trailside facilities. • Federal Transit Administration Funds: Some FTA funds may be used to fund the design, construction, and maintenance of pedestrian and bicycle projects that enhance or are related to public transportation facilities. • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Funds: NHTSA provides funding to states for imple- menting priority area programs and activities to improve traffic safety and reduce crashes, serious injuries, and fatalities. Emphasis areas under the pedestrian and bicycle safety program include: – Increasing awareness and understanding of safety issues and compliance with traffic laws – Development and use of a systematic approach to identify locations and behaviors prone to bicycle and pedestrian crashes and implementing multidisciplinary countermeasures – Creating urban and rural built environments that support and encourage safe walking and biking • SUN Trail Network Funds: SUN Trail funds are managed by the FDEP Office of Greenways and Trails. The Southwest Coast Connector Trail Alignment noted in the Needs Plan (Chapter 4) is eligible to receive SUN Trail funding. Not all funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects is done through traditional funding programs. Alternative funding sources include the following: • The Collier MPO has jurisdictional authority over land use and zoning and can, therefore, work with developers to address gaps in bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and make connections as new homes, communities, and shopping areas are constructed. • The MPO can form partnerships with other agencies to implement projects. • Bicycle and pedestrian improvements can be incorporated into roadway construction projects or funded independently. For example, Collier County typically funds transportation improvements that incorporate bicycle and pedestrian facilities using local funds on County-owned roads. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 5-7 Chapter 5 Financial Resources •The County and its municipalities can apply for funding related to state and federal grant programs, Safe Routes to Schools Programs, NHTSA, and the Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development Transportation Discretionary Grant program (formerly the Transportation Investment Generating Economy Recovery Grant program). 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Chapter 6 – Cost Feasible Plan September 2020 DRAFT - 9/25/20CAC/TAC Comments due 10/7/209.C.1Packet Pg. 368Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan i Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Contents Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan.................................................................................................................................................................... 6-1 6-1 Roadway Cost Feasible Projects ............................................................................................................................................... 6-1 Roadway Projects Prioritization ................................................................................................................................................ 6-1 Funding of Other Roadway Needs .......................................................................................................................................... 6-10 Unfunded Roadway Needs ..................................................................................................................................................... 6-11 6-2 Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects .............................................................................................................................................. 6-14 6-3 Transit Cost Feasible Projects ................................................................................................................................................. 6-14 Transit Cost Assumptions........................................................................................................................................................ 6-14 6-4 Freight Network Projects ........................................................................................................................................................ 6-20 6-5 Airport Transportation Projects .............................................................................................................................................. 6-20 Tables Table 6-1. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP SIS Cost Feasible Plan Projects .......................................................................................................... 6-2 Table 6-2. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Projects – FDOT Other Roads Projects and Local Roadway Projects ................. 6-4 Table 6-3. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Projects – Partially Funded Projects (FY2026–FY2045) ...................................... 6-8 Table 6-4. Congestion Management Projects Funded in TIP................................................................................................................. 6-11 Table 6-5. 2045 LRTP Unfunded Roadway Needs .................................................................................................................................. 6-12 Table 6-6. Costs of Priority Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects by Mileage Totals .................................................................................... 6-14 Table 6-7. 2045 Transit Needs Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 6-16 Figures Figure 6-1. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP SIS Cost Feasible Plan Projects ........................................................................................................ 6-3 Figure 6-2. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map (FY2026–FY2030) .................................. 6-5 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan ii Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Figure 6-3. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map (FY2031–FY2035) .................................. 6-6 Figure 6-4. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map (FY2036–FY2045) .................................. 6-7 Figure 6-5. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map – Partially Funded (FY2026–FY2045) ... 6-9 Figure 6-6. Total Costs by Project Phase for FDOT Other Roads and Local Roads Funded Projects 2026-2045 ................................... 6-10 Figure 6-7. Total Costs by Funding Source 2026-2045 .......................................................................................................................... 6-10 Figure 6-8. 2045 Transit Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map ..................................................................................................................... 6-19 Figure 6-9. Freight Hotspot Locations.................................................................................................................................................... 6-20 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-1 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan This chapter summarizes the development of the 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan, which identifies the multimodal trans- portation projects that can be funded through 2045 based on the estimated revenues presented in Chapter 5. 6-1 Roadway Cost Feasible Projects Development of the cost feasible roadway projects began by estimating the costs associated with each project in the roadway needs. As detailed in the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Update Project Cost Development Methodology Technical Memorandum presented in Appendix E, planning-level costs were developed for each project phase including Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study, preliminary engineering/design (PE), ROW, construction (CST), and environmental mitigation. The project phase costs were developed using the FDOT 2045 LRTP Cost Estimation Tool and recent roadway project costs within the County. The cost components were applied to individual roadway projects from the Needs Plan to develop the roadway cost feasible projects for the LRTP. Once the projects were prioritized, the FDOT present-day cost inflation factors were applied to develop YOE costs for each project. Roadway Projects Prioritization As noted in Chapter 2, five alternative network scenarios were modeled using the D1RPM travel model. The first two network scenarios were not financially constrained and helped refine and develop the list of project needs. Alternative Network Scenarios 3 through 6 were modeled using an iterative process on a financially constrained list of projects to test travel demand and congestion throughout the network. These results of each network scenario test were shared with both the County and TAC/CAC during advisory meetings for input on projects to be included in the next model run. The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Update Scenario Network Modeling Technical Memorandum presents more details on the results of each network scenario modeled (refer to Appendix E). Projects were also prioritized based on public input. Using the WikiMapping online interactive tool, the public selected their top five projects from the roadway needs and cost feasible projects and provided comments. Further details on this public outreach is presented in Chapter 2-4, Public Participation. The Collier MPO TIP and FDOT Work Program are updated annually and extend to 2025. The cost feasible projects presented in herein are consistent with the TIP and FDOT Work Program. Should funding for a project phase be identified sooner than anticipated in this LRTP, an amendment of this LRTP is required to reflect the consistency with the updated TIP. The roadway projects selected for inclusion in the Cost Feasible Plan are illustrated in the following maps and tables. As noted in Chapter 5, financial planning for statewide and metropolitan transportation plans is typically required for three periods: short range, intermediate range, and long range. Therefore, the cost feasible projects are presented in three multi-year planning periods: Fiscal Years (FY) 2026 to 2030, FY2031 to FY2035, and FY2036 to FY2045. Table 6-1 presents the SIS roadway cost feasible projects by planning year and project phase. Figure 6-1 presents a map of the projects and a distribution of the costs by phase. Table 6-2 presents the FDOT Other Roads Projects and Local Roadway Projects by planning year and project phase. Figures 6-2, 6-3, and 6-4 presents these projects by planning years including the distribution of costs by phase. Table 6-3 presents the partially funded projects within the FDOT Other Roads Projects and Local Roadway Projects, and Figure 6-5 presents a map of these projects for the entire planning period (FY2026 to FY2045). 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-2 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-1. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP SIS Cost Feasible Plan Projects Draft 9/21/2020 (in millions $) PRE-ENG ROW CST PRE-ENG ROW CST PRE-ENG ROW CST PRE-ENG ROW CST 92 SR 82 [4308481]Hendry Co.Line Gator Slough Lane Widen from 2-Lanes to 4- Lanes $44.73 0.07 $2.12 $42.54 $2.80 $2.80 50 SR 29 [4175406]New Market Road North North of SR-82 Widen from 2-Lanes to 4- Lanes (with center turn lane) $1.47 0.38 1.09 29.94 $29.94 51 SR 29/New Market Rd W - New Road [4175405] Immokalee Rd (CR 846)New Market Rd N New 4-Lane Road $6.74 0.06 $6.68 $5.88 $49.91 $55.78 52 SR 29 [4175404]Agriculture Way CR 846 E Widen from 2-Lanes to 4- Lanes $0.27 0.27 $5.63 $23.32 $28.95 29 I-75 (SR-93) Managed (Toll) Lanes [FPID 4425192] E of Collier Blvd (SR 951)Collier/Lee County Line New 4-Lane Express (Toll) Lanes (10-lanes) $0.03 0.03 63.25 145.43 $208.67 48 SR 29 [4344901]I-75 (SR 93)Oil Well Rd Widen from 2-Lane to 4 Lanes $0.03 0.03 4.33 $4.33 53 SR 29 (SEGMENT D) [4175403]Sunniland Nursery Rd Agriculture Way Widen from 2-Lanes to 4- Lanes $0.50 0.5 $2.38 $2.38 54 SR 29 (SEGMENT E) [4175402 Oil Well Rd Sunniland Nursery Rd Widen from 2-Lanes to 4- Lanes $8.33 8.33 $4.55 $4.55 46 SR 29 [4178784]SR 82 Hendry C/L Widen from 2-Lanes to 4- Lanes $1.37 0.07 $1.30 $0.00 Totals $63.47 $9.74 $11.19 $42.54 $0.00 $5.88 $32.74 $67.58 $12.55 $0.00 $0.00 $145.43 $73.22 $337.40 PRE-ENG PDC Present Day Cost ROW Right-of-Way CST Construction YOE Year of Expenditure Limits To Description TIP Funding 2021–25 (YOE) PRE-ENG includes PD&E and Design $63.47 $38.62 $80.13 $218.65 Plan Period 1 (TIP): 2020–2025 Plan Period 2: 2026–2030 Plan Period 3: 2031–2035 Plan Period 4: 2036–2045 Total Cost 2026–2045Map ID Facility (FPID No.)Limits From 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-3 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Figure 6-1. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP SIS Cost Feasible Plan Projects $0.00 $20.00 $40.00 $60.00 $80.00 $100.00 $120.00 $140.00 $160.00 $180.00 PRE-ENG ROW CST $67.58 $163.86 $105.97 Cost (millions $)Phase Cost by Phase FDOT SIS PROJECTS 2026-2045 ($ IN MILLIONS) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-4 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-2. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Projects – FDOT Other Roads Projects and Local Roadway Projects Draft 9/21/2020 (in millions $) PRE-ENG includes PD&E and Design Present Day Cost Right-of-Way Construction YOE Year of Expenditure 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-5 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Figure 6-2. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map (FY2026–FY2030) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-6 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Figure 6-3. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map (FY2031–FY2035) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-7 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Figure 6-4. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map (FY2036–FY2045) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-8 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-3. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Projects – Partially Funded Projects (FY2026–FY2045) Draft 9/21/2020 (in millions $) Notes: Partially funded for construction PRE-ENG includes PD&E and Design Present Day Cost Right-of-Way Construction YOE Year of Expenditure 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-9 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Figure 6-5. FDOT Other Roads and Local Roadway Projects Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map – Partially Funded (FY2026–FY2045) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-10 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Figures 6-6 and 6-7 present the total costs by project phase and funding source, respectively, for the FDOT Other Roads and Local Roads cost feasible projects for this 2045 LRTP update. Figure 6-6. Total Costs by Project Phase for FDOT Other Roads and Local Roads Funded Projects 2026-2045 (YOE $ in millions) Figure 6-7. Total Costs by Funding Source 2026-2045 (YOE $ in millions) Funding of Other Roadway Needs East of CR 951 Bridges As noted in Chapter 4, there are 10 proposed canal crossing bridges that are the subject of the 2020 East of CR 951 Bridge Reevaluation Study. A 1-cent infrastructure surtax with specific funding earmarked for constructing these new bridges will be available within the next 7 years. A total of $20.8 mil- lion in TMA (or SU) Funds is dedicated for bridge projects in the 2045 LRTP update: • Planning Period 2026 to 2030: $5.24 million for CST • Planning Period 2031 to 2035: $5.20 million for CST • Planning Period 2036 to 2045: $10.36 million for CST Congestion Management Projects Congestion management and ITS projects are generally short- term and immediate action projects. Therefore, their role in the LRTP process is modest and are more thoroughly addressed in the congestion management process. The current TIP includes several improvements to the traffic management center, arterial monitoring cameras, and other traffic equipment improvements that address safety, active roadway management, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Table 6-4 presents congestion management projects funded for construction in the 2021-2025 TIP. $0.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 PRE-ENG ROW CST $170.61 $98.35 $801.52 Cost (millions $)Phase $541.55$443.20 $85.72 County OA (ROW and CST) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-11 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-4. Congestion Management Projects Funded in TIP ITS Projects Funded Amount TIP/CIP Year Bicycle Detection – City of Naples (refer to Figure 4-7 in Chapter 4) $66,429 CST 2024/25 ITS Fiber Optic and FPL Power Infrastructure at 13 locations $272,725 CST 2024/25 Travel Time Data Collection and Performance Measures $700,000 CST 2020/21 New Updated School Flasher System $353,250 CST 2024/25 New Vehicle Count Station Update (refer to Figure 4-7 in Chapter 4) $311,562 CST 2023/24 New ATCS at 13 signalized locations along Santa Barbara Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway (refer to Figure 4-7 in Chapter 4) $893,000 PE 2023/24 CST 2024/25 Source: Collier MPO 2020 Transportation System Performance Report & Action Plan Future congestion management projects will be prioritized through the MPO’s congestion management process. A total of $41.46 million in TMA (or SU) Funds is dedicated for future congestion management projects in the 2045 LRTP update: • Planning Period 2026 to 2030: $10.42 million for CST • Planning Period 2031 to 2035: $10.39 million for CST • Planning Period 2036 to 2045: $20.65 million for CST Maintenance Maintenance of the state roadways within the County and its associated municipalities is not included in this LRTP update. As noted in the FDOT’s 2045 Revenue Forecast for the Collier MPO, FDOT has included sufficient funding to meet the following statewide objectives and policies: • Resurfacing program: Ensure that 80 percent of state highway system pavement meets FDOT standards • Bridge program: Ensure that 90 percent of FDOT- maintained bridges meet Department standards while keeping all FDOT-maintained bridges open to the public safe • Operations and maintenance program: Achieve 100 percent of acceptable maintenance condition standard on the SHS • Product Support: Reserve funds for product support required to construct improvements (funded with the forecast’s capacity funds) in each FDOT district and metropolitan area • Administration: Administer the state transportation program Maintenance of County and its associated municipality’s roadways is funded primarily through fuel taxes and General Fund revenues. The maintenance programs primarily address routine maintenance operations that are preventive or corrective in nature and that address safety concerns. Unfunded Roadway Needs While the projects included in the roadway Cost Feasible Plan will address many of the congestion, safety, and capacity issues forecasted for 2045, financial resources are limited. Therefore, a number of unfunded projects in the 2045 roadway Needs Plan are not addressed in this Cost Feasible Plan. Table 6-5 summarizes projects included in the roadway Needs Plan that are unfunded in this 2045 LRTP update. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-12 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-5. 2045 LRTP Unfunded Roadway Needs Map ID Project From To Project Description 1 Benfield Rd. Extension The Lords Way City Gate Blvd. N New 2-Lane Road (Expandable to 4 Lanes) 2 Benfield Rd. US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E) Rattlesnake-Hammock Extension New 2-Lane Road (Expandable to 4 Lanes) 3 Big Cypress Parkway North of I-75 Golden Gate Blvd. New 2-Lane Road (Expandable to 4 Lanes) 4 Big Cypress Parkway Golden Gate Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension New 2-Lane Road (Expandable to 4 Lanes) 6 Big Cypress Parkway Oil Well Rd. Immokalee Rd. New 2-Lane Road (Expandable to 4 Lanes) 7 Camp Keais Rd. Pope John Paul Blvd. Oil Well Road Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 8 Camp Keais Rd. Immokalee Rd. Pope John Paul Blvd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 10 CR 951 Extension Collier Blvd. (CR 951) (northern terminus) Lee/Collier County Line New 2-Lane Road 13 Everglades Blvd. Golden Gate Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Extension Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 14 Everglades Blvd. I-75 (SR-93) Golden Gate Blvd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 15 Golden Gate Blvd. Everglades Blvd. Desoto Blvd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 16 Golden Gate Blvd. Extension Desoto Blvd. Big Cypress Parkway New 4-Lane Road 18 Green Blvd. Santa Barbara/Logan Blvd. Sunshine Blvd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 19 Green Blvd. Extension (16th Ave. SW) 23rd St. SW Wilson Blvd. Extension (Corridor Study) New 2-Lane (Future Study Area) 20 Green Blvd. Extension (16th Ave. SW) CR 951 23rd St. SW (Corridor Study) New 4-Lane (Future Study Area) 21 Green Blvd. Extension (16th Ave. SW) Wilson Blvd. Ext Everglades Blvd. (Corridor Study) New 2-Lane Road 27 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange (new) Vanderbilt Beach Rd. New Interchange - Partial (to/from the north) 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-13 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-5. 2045 LRTP Unfunded Roadway Needs Map ID Project From To Project Description 30 Immokalee Rd. (CR 846) Camp Keais Rd. Carver St. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 32 Keane Ave.. Inez Rd. Wilson Blvd. Extension New 2-Lane Road (Future Study Area) 34 Logan Blvd. Green Blvd. Pine Ridge Rd. Widen from 4 Lanes to 6 Lanes 35 Logan Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Immokalee Rd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 38 Oil Well Road / CR 858 Ave. Maria Entrance Camp Keais Rd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 6 Lanes 40 Orange Blossom Dr Airport Pulling Rd. Livingston Rd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 43 Randall Blvd. Everglades Blvd. Desoto Blvd. Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 44 Randall Blvd. Desoto Blvd. Big Cypress Parkway New 4-Lane Road 45 Santa Barbara Blvd. Painted Leaf Ln.. Green Blvd. Widen from 4 Lanes to 6 Lanes 67 Veterans Memorial Blvd. Extension Strand Blvd. I-75 New 4-Lane Road 68 Big Cypress Parkway Intersection (new) Oil Well Grade Rd. New At-Grade Intersection 70 Green Blvd. Extension Everglades Blvd. Big Cypress Parkway New 2-Lane Road 73 Immokalee Rd. (CR 846) Intersection Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Major Intersection Improvement 75 I-75 (SR-93) Interchange (new) Veterans Memorial Blvd. New Partial Interchange 76 Vanderbilt Dr. Immokalee Rd. Woods Edge Parkway Widen from 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-14 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan 6-2 Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects The BPMP noted in Chapter 4 is a systems plan that focuses on identifying the needs and a policy framework for prioritization and implementation of bicycle and pedestrian projects. Further, it provides maximum flexibility in bringing projects forward for funding and offers design guidelines based on best practices that implementing agencies may use as guidance. Therefore, implementation of these projects is more thoroughly addressed through the individual agencies and the MPO bicycle and pedestrian advisory process. The BPMP provided planning-level project costs for the bicycle and pedestrian projects presented in Chapter 4. These costs did not include costs for ROW or drainage. An engineering cost estimate would be required for submission of a project for prioritization consideration. Table 6-6 lists the costs associated with priority projects presented in Chapter 4 (Table 4-9) and the figure in Appendix C (Existing + Proposed). These costs are by order of magnitude and are for constructing different combinations of bicycle and pedestrian facilities on the road segments associated with the bicycle and pedestrian priority projects. It is anticipated that this process will be continued throughout the period of the long-range transportation plan, with an annual updating of priorities for inclusion in the TIP by the BPAC. A total of $41.46 million in TMA/TA (or SU/TALU) Funds is dedicated for future pedestrian and bicycle projects in the 2045 LRTP update: • Planning Period 2026 to 2030 - $10.42 Million for CST • Planning Period 2031 to 2035 - $10.39 Million for CST • Planning Period 2036 to 2045 - $20.65 Million for CST Table 6-6. Costs of Priority Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects by Mileage Totals Component Mileage Cost Per Mile Total Cost Shared use paths and bike lanes on both sides of roadway 122 $1,104,000 $135 million Bicycle lanes on both sides; shared use path on one side, sidewalk on the other 122 $972,000 $119 million Bicycle lanes and sidewalks on both sides of roadway 122 $840,000 $103 million Bicycle lanes on both sides; shared use path on one side 122 $818,000 $100 million Bike lanes on both sides, sidewalk on one side 122 $686,000 $84 million Source: Collier MPO 2020 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan 6-3 Transit Cost Feasible Projects Similar to the development of roadway cost feasible projects, the cost feasible transit projects were developed by estimating the costs associated with each project in the transit needs. Transit Cost Assumptions Numerous cost assumptions were made to forecast transit costs for 2021 through 2045. Costs include annual service and technology/capital improvements that are programmed for implementation within the plan period. The following subsections summarize assumptions for capital and operating costs noted in the TDP. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-15 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Operating Cost Assumptions Operating cost assumptions are based on a variety of factors, including service performance data from CAT and information from other recent Florida TDPs. These assumptions are summarized as follows: • Annual operating costs for fixed-route and paratransit services are based on the most recent validated National Transit Database data. • An annual inflation rate of 1.8 percent was used for all operating cost projections, with the exception of FY2029 Federal Transit Authority Section 5307 funds, which increased more than 100 percent because of the cost of extending service span on several routes (lumped into 1 year within the 10-year window of the TDP). • Annual operating costs for future service enhancements are based on the projected annual service hours and cost per revenue hour of $82.32 for fixed-route service and $63.91 for paratransit service (both in 2018 dollars). • Implementing the new route alignments represents increased levels of service in such improvements as Route 14, 19/28, and Route 23 with no additional costs. • Express routes and MOD would not require complementary Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) paratransit services if implemented. Capital Cost Assumptions Service assumptions were also developed to estimate the costs for capital needs described in Chapter 4 and are summarized as follows: • Replacement of vehicles within the existing fleet that have reached the end of their useful life and vehicles to implement new service. • Vehicles are assumed to cost $495,000 for fixed-route bus and $71,217 for paratransit vehicles. Between 2020 and 2045, it is estimated that 71 fixed-route vehicles and 88 paratransit vehicles will need to be purchased. • An annual growth rate of 1.8 percent was used for capital cost projections. • A 20-percent spare ratio was factored into the vehicle replacement and expansion schedule. • A useful life for bus and paratransit vehicle replacement is 12 years and 7 years, respectively. • Bus shelter expenses were assumed to be the same funding levels obtained from the FY2021 Collier County Government Requested Budget with an annual inflation rate of 1.8 percent. • Technology costs were obtained from the draft budget for FY2020 Federal Transit Authority Section 5307 and 5339 Program of Projects Draft budget. Based on the funding availability and prioritized results, the transit cost feasible projects are summarized in Table 6-7 and illustrated in Figure 6-8. 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-16 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-7. 2045 Transit Needs Summary Route Location TDP 2021–2030 LRTP 2031–2045 Funded Operating/Capital Cost (YOE) Funded Operating/Capital Cost (YOE) Proposed Realignment Changes Route 11 – Extend to Walmart Shopping Center X $0/$0 Route 12 – Extend to Walmart Shopping Center X $0/$0 Route 13 and 14 – Realign from one-way pair to two bidirectional routes X $0/$0 Routes 17 and 18 – Combine portion of the two routes along and remove service along Tamiami Trail X $0/$0 Routes 19 and 28 – Realign unproductive segments and combine service hours with Route 28 for increased frequency X $0/$0 Route 20 and 26 – Combine to improve frequency and streamline service. X $0/$0 Route 21 (Marco Island Express) – Provide express service to the Walmart Supercenter on Collier Blvd. and Tamiami Trail Route 22 – Realign to streamline circulation in Immokalee and extend service to high employment centers Route 23 – Realign to provide direct connections to residential cluster on Lake Trafford Road, and Farm Workers Way Route 25 (NS and EW) – Extend NS service and no change to ES service Route 27 (NS and EW) – Extend NS service south and the EW service east 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-17 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-7. 2045 Transit Needs Summary Route Location TDP 2021–2030 LRTP 2031–2045 Funded Operating/Capital Cost (YOE) Funded Operating/Capital Cost (YOE) Proposed Frequency Changes Route 11 – 30 min to 20 min X $17,215,415/$0 Route 12 – 25/90 min to 30 min and 60 min at off-peak X $7,460,013/$0 Route 13 – 40 min to 30 min Route 14 – 60 min to 30 min Route 15 and 16 – 90 min to 45 min Route 19/28 – 165 min to 60 min Route 23 – 60 min to 40 min X $3,805,909/$1,016,470 Route 24- 85 min to 60 min X $204,376/$503,771 Route 121 – Add two morning and evening trips during peak periods X (Partial – one AM and one PM) $163,066/$503,771 Proposed Span Improvements Route 11, 13, 14, 17/18, 1 – Extend to 10 p.m. X $1,808,329/$0 Route 19/28, Route 24 – Extend to 10 p.m. Proposed New Service Routes Island Trolley New UF/IFAS and Lehigh Acres Route I-75 Premium Express 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-18 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Table 6-7. 2045 Transit Needs Summary Route Location TDP 2021–2030 LRTP 2031–2045 Funded Operating/Capital Cost (YOE) Funded Operating/Capital Cost (YOE) Bayshore Shuttle Downtown Autonomous Circulator Naples Pier Electric Shuttle Mobility-On-Demand Vanpooling (Everglades City) Capital Infrastructure Regionwide Technology X (Partial) $0/$2,720,920 Security – driver protection barriers X $0/$153,080 Bus Stop Infrastructure Technical Studies X $0/$100,000 Improve ADA Accessibility Replace and Add New Vehicles Park-and-Ride Lots 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-19 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan Figure 6-8. 2045 Transit Cost Feasible Plan Projects Map 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan 6-20 Chapter 6 Cost Feasible Plan 6-4 Freight Network Projects FDOT updated its Freight Mobility and Trade Plan (FMTP) in April 2020.1 The FMTP is a comprehensive plan that identifies freight transportation facilities critical to the state’s economic growth and guides multimodal freight investments in the state. The FMTP identified freight hotspots as presented in Figure 6-9. Collier County has low to medium freight activity along the I-75 corridor. According to the data from the FMTP, there are two Freight Intensive Areas in the County: East Naples Industrial area and the Immokalee Airport Industrial area. A Freight Intensive Area is a cluster or group of freight facilities that generates, distributes, or attracts large amounts of freight activities and has a significant impact on Florida’s transportation system and economy. Out of 70 Freight Intensive Areas within the state, the East Naples and Immokalee Airport areas ranked 42nd and 43rd, respectively, by total freight parcel floor area. The FMTP Technical Memorandum 6, Project Prioritization and Selection 2 presents the methodology and the freight project selection and prioritization process. Noted on the list of prioritized projects in the FMTP as a low priority were the I-75 at CR 846 (Immokalee Road) and I-75 at Pine Ridge Road interchange modification projects. All projects listed in Table 6-1, 2045 SIS Cost Feasible Projects, are part of the Regional Freight Mobility Corridors within the Collier MPO boundary (refer to Figure 4-4 in Chapter 4). A total of 20 of the cost feasible projects identified in this 2045 LRTP Update are on the freight network within Collier MPO boundary. 1 https://www.fdot.gov/rail/plandevel/freight-mobility-and-trade-plan Figure 6-9. Freight Hotspot Locations 6-5 Airport Transportation Projects As noted in Chapter 4, two off-airport transportation projects were identified in the roadway Needs Plan to improve access to Naples Airport and Immokalee Regional Airport. Project no. 31, Immokalee Road from Airpark Boulevard to SR 29, has been identified as cost feasible for construction in FY2036 to FY2045. The project includes widening Immokalee Road from two to four lanes and will improve traffic operations and access to the industrial warehouses within the property of the Immokalee Regional Airport. Approximately $7.2 million has been dedicated to this off-airport roadway project in the Cost Feasible Plan using County funds. 2 https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default- source/rail/fmtp/april-2020/fmtp-tm6_project-prioritization-and- selection.pdf 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Draft Chapters 1-6 of the 2045 LRTP (13752 : Review and comment on draft chapters 1- 6 of 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approval of the Supplemental Public Transportation Joint Participation Agreement # 2 (JPA) for Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 5305 (d) funding and the authorizing resolution OBJECTIVE: To approve a Supplemental JPA which will allow tasks programmed in the current FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) to be eligible to be billed to the grant agreement (G0581), and to authorize the Chair to execute the agreement and any related documents. CONSIDERATIONS: The Supplemental JPA provides for the Departments participation, using FTA Section 5305(d), “Metropolitan Planning Program” and State cash match financial assistance, in the Agency’s (Collier MPO) eligible expenses associated with FTA Section 5305(d) funded planning tasks. The current JPA states that FTA § 5305(d) funds are used for transit planning tasks that are identified in the 2016/17-2017/18 and 2018/19-2019/20 Unified Planning Work Program (“UPWP”). All funding associated with this agreement has either been allocated to a study that is currently underway or has been spent except for funding allocated to travel and office supplies. Due to Covid -19, all expected travel and training opportunities will be virtual through the end of 2020. The JPA terminates on December 31, 2020 and all funding must be expended prior to that date. The Supplemental JPA #2 (Attachment 1) was created to amend the current agreement to allow for tasks identified in the current (FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP) to be funded with the agreement. This will allow staff to reallocate remaining travel and office supply budget to personnel. The authorizing resolution is included as Attachment 2. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: This is a contractual matter and was not taken to the committees. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: For the Board to approve the Supplemental JPA and approve the authorizing resolution. Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Principal Planner ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Supplemental JPA #2 (PDF) 2. Resolution 2020-12 (PDF) 9.D Packet Pg. 391 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 9.D Doc ID: 13753 Item Summary: Approval of the Supplemental Public Transportation Joint Participation Agreement # 2 (JPA) for Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 5305 (d) funding and the authorizing resolution Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 11:11 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 11:11 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:02 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:04 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 9.D Packet Pg. 392 9.D.1 Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Supplemental JPA #2 (13753 : Approval of the Supplemental Public Transportation Joint Participation Agreement # 2 (JPA) for 9.D.1 Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Supplemental JPA #2 (13753 : Approval of the Supplemental Public Transportation Joint Participation Agreement # 2 (JPA) for 9.D.1 Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Supplemental JPA #2 (13753 : Approval of the Supplemental Public Transportation Joint Participation Agreement # 2 (JPA) for 9.D.1 Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Supplemental JPA #2 (13753 : Approval of the Supplemental Public Transportation Joint Participation Agreement # 2 (JPA) for 9.D.1 Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Supplemental JPA #2 (13753 : Approval of the Supplemental Public Transportation Joint Participation Agreement # 2 (JPA) for 9.D.1 Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Supplemental JPA #2 (13753 : Approval of the Supplemental Public Transportation Joint Participation Agreement # 2 (JPA) for 9.D.2 Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Resolution 2020-12 (13753 : Approval of the Supplemental Public Transportation Joint Participation Agreement # 2 (JPA) for 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to approve the amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (PTGA) for Section 5305(d) funding and the authorizing resolution. CONSIDERATIONS: On May 8, 2020 the MPO Board entered into a PTGA with the Florida Department of Transportation for Section 5305(d) funding. The FY 20/21-21/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) is included as “Exhibit A” to that agreement. The PTGA must be amended to include the amended UPWP as the new “Exhibit A”. There may be future amendments as the UPWP continues to be amended. The amendment to the PTGA is included as Attachment 1. The authorizing resolution is included as Attachment 2. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: This item is administrative in nature and was not taken to the Advisory Committees. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the amendment to the PTGA and approve the authorizing resolution. Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Principal Planner ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Amendment to PTGA (PDF) 2. Resolution 2020-13 (PDF) 9.E Packet Pg. 400 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 9.E Doc ID: 13754 Item Summary: Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 11:20 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 11:20 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:15 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:16 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 9.E Packet Pg. 401 9.E.1Packet Pg. 402Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 403Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 404Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 405Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 406Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 407Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 408Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 409Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 410Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 411Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 412Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 413Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 414Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 415Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 416Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 417Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 418Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 419Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 420Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 421Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 422Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 423Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 424Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 425Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 426Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 427Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 428Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 429Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 430Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 431Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 432Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 433Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 434Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 435Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 436Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 437Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 438Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 439Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 440Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 441Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 442Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 443Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 444Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 445Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 446Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 447Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 448Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 449Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 450Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 451Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 452Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 453Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 454Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 455Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 456Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 457Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 458Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 459Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 460Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 461Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 462Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 463Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 464Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 465Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 466Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 467Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 468Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 469Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 470Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 471Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 472Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 473Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 474Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 475Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 476Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 477Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 478Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 479Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 480Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 481Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 482Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 483Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 484Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 485Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 486Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 487Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.1Packet Pg. 488Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.2 Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Resolution 2020-13 (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 9.E.2 Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Resolution 2020-13 (13754 : Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1J00) and the authorizing resolution) 10/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing resolution OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to approve Amendment # 2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (PTGA) for Section 5305(d) funding and the authorizing resolution. CONSIDERATIONS: On April 12, 2019 MPO Board meeting, the Board entered into a PTGA with the Florida Department of Transportation for Section 5305(d) funding. The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) is included as “Exhibit A” to that agreement. The PTGA was previously amended to include the amendments to the FY 18/19-19/20 UPWP. The PTGA must now be amended to include the FY 20/21-21/22 UPWP Amendment 1 as the new “Exhibit A”. There may be future amendments as the UPWP continues to be amended. In addition, the DUNS no, has been updated in the current agreement. The amendment to the PTGA is included as Attachment 1. The authorizing resolution is included as Attachment 2. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: This item is administrative in nature and was not taken to the Advisory Committees. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the amendment to the PTGA and approve the authorizing resolution. ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Amendment to PTGA (PDF) 2. Resolution 2020-14 (PDF) 9.F Packet Pg. 491 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 9.F Doc ID: 13755 Item Summary: Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing resolution Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 11:27 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 11:27 AM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:06 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 12:07 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 9.F Packet Pg. 492 9.F.1Packet Pg. 493Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 494Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 495Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 496Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 497Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 498Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 499Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 500Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 501Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 502Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 503Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 504Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 505Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 506Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 507Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 508Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 509Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 510Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 511Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 512Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 513Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 514Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 515Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 516Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 517Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 518Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 519Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 520Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 521Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 522Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 523Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 524Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 525Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 526Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 527Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 528Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 529Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 530Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 531Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 532Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 533Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 534Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 535Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 536Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 537Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 538Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 539Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 540Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 541Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 542Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 543Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 544Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 545Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 546Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 547Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 548Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 549Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 550Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 551Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 552Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 553Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 554Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 555Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 556Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 557Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 558Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 559Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 560Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 561Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 562Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 563Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 564Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 565Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 566Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 567Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 568Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 569Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 570Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 571Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 572Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 573Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 574Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 575Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 576Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 577Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 578Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 579Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.1Packet Pg. 580Attachment: Amendment to PTGA (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing 9.F.2Packet Pg. 581Attachment: Resolution 2020-14 (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing resolution) 9.F.2Packet Pg. 582Attachment: Resolution 2020-14 (13755 : Approve Amendment #2 to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the authorizing resolution) 10/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Item Number: 13.A Item Summary: Next Meeting Date - November 13, 2020 - 9:00 a.m. Board of County Commissioners Chambers, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 Meeting Date: 10/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Karen Intriago 10/01/2020 12:43 PM Submitted by: Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization Name: Anne McLaughlin 10/01/2020 12:43 PM Approved By: Review: Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 10/01/2020 1:32 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 10/01/2020 2:29 PM Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 10/09/2020 9:00 AM 13.A Packet Pg. 583