Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CCPC Agenda 10/15/2020
AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., OCTOBER 15, 2020, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, THIRD FLOOR, 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA: AS PART OF AN ONGOING INITIATIVE TO PROMOTE SOCIAL DISTANCING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENTS REMOTELY, AS WELL AS IN PERSON, DURING THIS PROCEEDING. INDIVIDUALS WHO WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY, SHOULD REGISTER AT http://bit.ly/Oct15CCPCSpeakerRegistration ANY TIME AFTER THE AGENDA IS POSTED ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE WHICH IS 6 DAYS BEFORE THE MEETING OR THROUGH THE LINK PROVIDED ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE COUNTY WEBSITE AT www.colliercountyfl.gov. INDIVIDUALS WHO REGISTER WILL RECEIVE AN EMAIL IN ADVANCE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING DETAILING HOW THEY CAN PARTICIPATE REMOTELY IN THIS MEETING. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING, PLEASE CALL THOMAS CLARKE AT (239) 252-2526 OR EMAIL TO:thomas.clarke(a,CollierCountyFL.gov. NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO,AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6. BCC REPORT-RECAPS 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 8. CONSENT AGENDA 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ADVERTISED: Page 1 of 3 1. ***Note: This item was continued from the October 1,2020 CCPC meeting to the October 15,2020 CCPC meeting.*** PL20190000696 GMPA — Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Subdistrict - Amending Ordinance no. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the future land use element and future land use map and map series by amending the urban mixed use district,residential subdistrict to add the Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Subdistrict to allow construction of up to 172 multi- family dwelling units and/or hotel rooms/suites,but no less than 40 residential units, and 10,000 square feet of C-3, commercial intermediate commercial uses, and a marina and a ship store. The subject property is located at the northeast corner Of the intersection of Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road in section 32,township 48 south,range 25 east,consisting of 5.42 acres; and furthermore, recommending transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida department of economic opportunity; providing for severability and providing for an effective date. (Companion Item PL20190000697) [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt,Principal Planner] 2. ***Note: This item was continued from the October 1, 2020 CCPC meeting to the October 15,2020 CCPC meeting.*** PL20190000697 PUDZ -An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41,as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Commercial Intermediate district (C-3) zoning district to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as One Naples MPUD, to allow construction of up to 172 multi-family dwelling units and/or hotel rooms/suites,but no less than 40 residential units, up to 208 feet in height including a parking deck, and 10,000 square feet of C-3, commercial intermediate commercial uses, and a marina and a ship store. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road in Section 32, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, consisting of 5.42 f acres; and by providing an effective date. (Companion Item PL20190000696) [Coordinator: James Sabo,Principal Planner] 3. ***Note: This item to be heard at 3:00 pm***PL20200001297 AUIR-A Resolution Relating to The Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended,providing for the annual update to the schedule of Capital Improvement Projects,within the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan based on the 2020 Annual Update And Inventory Report on Public Facilities(AUIR),and including updates to the 5- year schedule of Capital Projects contained within the Capital Improvement Element(for Fiscal Years 2021 -2025)and the Schedule of Capital Projects contained within The Capital Improvement Element for the future 5-year period (for Fiscal Years 2026 - 2030), providing for severability, and providing for an effective date. [Coordinator:Corby Schmidt,Principal Planner] 4. ***Note: This item is continued to the November 5, 2020 CCPC meeting.*** PL20180002233 GMPA-A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05,as amended, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element and Map Series to create the NC Square Mixed-Use Overlay on land in the Agricultural/Rural designation and Rural Fringe Mixed Use District-Receiving Lands Overlay to allow up to 44,400 square feet of commercial uses,a 12,000 square foot daycare limited to 250 students, and a maximum of 129 residential dwelling units and furthermore providing for transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property is 24.4 acres and located at the northwest corner of Immokalee Road and Catawba Street approximately 1.6 miles west of Wilson Boulevard in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County,Florida. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt,Principal Planner] 5. ***Note: This item is continued to the November 5, 2020 CCPC meeting.*** PL20190002305- MPUD (PUDR) Sabal Bay- Fleischmann Parcel An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 05-59, as amended, the Sabal Bay Mixed Use Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 102.49± acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A), Rural Agricultural with a Special Treatment overlay (A-ST), Residential Single Family-Three (RSF-3) and Residential Single Family-Three with a Special Treatment Page 2 of 3 overlay (RSF-3-ST) to the Sabal Bay Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD); by amending the PUD document and master plan to add 102.49±acres designated as Tract R9 for residential development; to add 230 dwelling units for a total of 2,229 dwelling units in the MPUD; to revise the master plan and conceptual water management plan; and to add a master site plan for the R9 Tract. The subject property is located south of Thomasson Drive, south and west of U. S. 41, north and west of the Wentworth PUD, and east of the Naples Bay Intercoastal Waterway in Sections 23, 24, 25, 26 and 36, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, and Section 19, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 2,518.98+/- acres; and providing an effective date. [Coordinator:Ray Bellow,Planning Manager] B. NOTICED: 10. NEW BUSINESS 11. OLD BUSINESS 12. PUBLIC COMMENT 13. ADJOURN CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows/di Page 3 of 3 Collier County Planning Commission Page 1 Printed 10/7/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 October 15, 2020 9: 00 AM Edwin Fryer- Chairman Karen Homiak - Vice-Chair Karl Fry- Secretary Christopher Vernon Paul Shea, Environmental Joseph Schmitt, Environmental Robert Klucik, Jr. Thomas Eastman, Collier County School Board Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Individuals selected to speak on behalf of an organization or group are encouraged and may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item if so recognized by the chairman. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the CCPC shall be submitted to the appropriate county staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. October 2020 Collier County Planning Commission Page 2 Printed 10/7/2020 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call by Secretary 3. Addenda to the Agenda 4. Planning Commission Absences 5. Approval of Minutes 6. BCC Report - Recaps 7. Chairman's Report 8. Consent Agenda 9. Public Hearings A. Advertised 1. ***Note: This item was continued from the October 1, 2020 CCPC meeting to the October 15, 2020 CCPC meetingt *** PL20190000696 GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Subdistrict - Amending Ordinance no. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the future land use element and future land use map and map series by amending the urban mixed use district, residential subdistrict to add the Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Subdistrict to allow construction of up to 172 multi-family dwelling units and/or hotel rooms/suites, but no less than 40 residential units, and 10,000 square feet of C-3, commercial intermediate commercial uses, and a marina and a ship store. The subject property is located at the northeast corner Of the intersection of Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road in section 32, township 48 south, range 25 east, consisting of 5.42 acres; and furthermore, recommending transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida department of economic opportunity; providing for severability and providing for an effective date. (Companion Item PL20190000697) [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] October 2020 Collier County Planning Commission Page 3 Printed 10/7/2020 2. ***Note: This item was continued from the October 1, 2020 CCPC meeting to the October 15, 2020 CCPC meeting.*** PL20190000697 PUDZ -An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Commercial Intermediate district (C-3) zoning district to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as One Naples MPUD, to allow construction of up to 172 multi-family dwelling units and/or hotel rooms/suites, but no less than 40 residential units, up to 208 feet in height including a parking deck, and 10,000 square feet of C-3, commercial intermediate commercial uses, and a marina and a ship store. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road in Section 32, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, consisting of 5.42 ± acres; and by providing an effective date. (Companion Item PL20190000696) [Coordinator: James Sabo, Principal Planner] 3. ***Note: This item to be heard at 3:00 pm*** PL20200001297 GMPA - A Resolution Relating to The Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended, providing for the annual update to the schedule of Capital Improvement Projects, within the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan based on the 2020 Annual Update And Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR), and including updates to the 5-year schedule of Capital Projects contained within the Capital Improvement Element (for Fiscal Years 2021 - 2025) and the Schedule of Capital Projects contained within The Capital Improvement Element for the future 5-year period (for Fiscal Years 2026 - 2030), providing for severability, and providing for an effective date. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] B. Noticed 10. New Business 11. Old Business 12. Public Comment 13. Adjourn 10/15/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.1 Item Summary: ***Note: This item was continued from the October 1, 2020 CCPC meeting to the October 15, 2020 CCPC meetingt *** PL20190000696 GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Subdistrict - Amending Ordinance no. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the future land use element and future land use map and map series by amending the urban mixed use district, residential subdistrict to add the Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Subdistrict to allow construction of up to 172 multi-family dwelling units and/or hotel rooms/suites, but no less than 40 residential units, and 10,000 square feet of C-3, commercial intermediate commercial uses, and a marina and a ship store. The subject property is located at the northeast corner Of the intersection of Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road in section 32, township 48 south, range 25 east, consisting of 5.42 acres; and furthermore, recommending transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida department of economic opportunity; providing for severability and providing for an effective date. (Companion Item PL20190000697) [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 10/15/2020 Prepared by: Title: Operations Analyst – Planning Commission Name: Diane Lynch 10/01/2020 6:10 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 10/01/2020 6:10 PM Approved By: Review: Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Skipped 10/01/2020 6:10 PM Zoning Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 10/01/2020 6:10 PM Zoning Diane Lynch Additional Reviewer Skipped 10/01/2020 6:10 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 10/01/2020 6:10 PM Growth Management Department Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 10/01/2020 6:10 PM Zoning Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 10/01/2020 6:10 PM Planning Commission Edwin Fryer Meeting Pending 10/15/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 4 Underlined text proposed to be added; struck-through text proposed to be deleted. H:\2016\2016025\WP\SSGMPA\Initial Submittal\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit IV.B.1. VBRMUSD GMPA Language (rev 5-29-2020) .docx Page 1 S TA F F R E P O R T TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: October 1, 2020 SUBJECT: PETITION PL20190000696/CPSS-19-10, SMALL SCALE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT [ADOPTION HEARING] (Companion to PL20190000697, One Naples PUDZ) ELEMENTS: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE) PETITIONER/AGENTS Petitioner: Keith Gelder, Vice President Vanderbilt Naples Holdings, LLC 2639 Professional Circle, Suite 101 Naples, Florida 34119 Agents: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Richard Yovanovich, Esq. Hole Montes, Inc. Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, PA 950 Encore Way 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34110 Naples, Florida 34103 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION The two-part subject site, consisting of ±5.42 acres, comprises a portion of the block located immediately north of the County’s Vanderbilt Beach Parking Garage, generally bounded on the south by Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862), Gulf Shore Drive on the west, and by South Bay Drive on the north and east, in Section 32, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. This part of the site also comprises all of Gulf Shore Court, an unnamed alley, and a westerly segment of Center Street. The second part of the subject site comprises a portion of mid-block waterfront lots located on Vanderbilt Lagoon. REQUESTED ACTION This petitioner seeks to eliminate portions of an existing District and Subdistrict in order to establish a new Subdistrict in the FLUE text, and FLUE Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan (GMP), affecting fewer than ten (10) acres, by amending: 1) Policy 1.5 of the Urban Mixed Use District to remove a portion of the existing Urban Residential Subdistrict, and replace with the Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict; 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: CPSS-19-10 Vanderbilt Beach Rd stff rprt_FNLLL2 (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Underlined text proposed to be added; struck-through text proposed to be deleted. H:\2016\2016025\WP\SSGMPA\Initial Submittal\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit IV.B.1. VBRMUSD GMPA Language (rev 5-29-2020) .docx Page 2 2) the Urban Designation, Urban ‒ Mixed Use District to establish the new Subdistrict provisions, and increase commercial intensity; 3) the FLUE’s Density Rating System to provide exceptions for the new Subdistrict; 4) the FLUE Future Land Use Map Series listing to add the title of the new Subdistrict map; and, 5) the FLUE Countywide Future Land Use Map to depict the new Subdistrict and adding a new Future Land Use Map Series inset map that depicts the new Subdistrict. The Subdistrict language proposed by this amendment is found in Ordinance Exhibit “A”. PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT The petitioner proposes to establish the Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Subdistrict that allows development of the property with multi-family residential units at a density of 31.7 DU/A, along with a mix of non-residential uses [commercial (C-4) zoning-intensity uses, including a hotel] and a marina. The FLUE’s Urban Mixed Use District permits water-dependent and water-related land uses within the coastal region of this District. Mixed-use sites of water-dependent and water-related uses and other recreational uses may include water-related parks, marinas (public or private), yacht clubs, and related accessory and recreational uses, such as boat storage, launching facilities, fueling facilities, and restaurants. Any development that includes a water-dependent and/or water-related land use shall be encouraged to use the Planned Unit Development technique and other innovative approaches to conserve environmentally sensitive areas and to assure compatibility with surrounding land uses. The County’s Land Development Code allows for marinas as permitted uses in the C-3 and C-4 Districts. The County’s Manatee Protection Plan (NR-SP-93-01) May 1995, provides the process to determine the number of wet slips, the construction of dry storage facilities, and boat ramps, based upon the Plan’s marina siting criteria. STAFF ANALYSIS FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS, ZONING AND LAND USES: Existing Conditions: Subject Property: The subject property, which comprises approximately 5.42 acres, is currently designated the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict and is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including mixed-use developments such as Planned Unit Developments. It is zoned C-3, Commercial Intermediate zoning district and developed with a variety of small businesses. Its commercial development potential ranges from a minimum of approximately 47,630 to 100,000 square feet of C-3 uses. Urban Residential Subdistrict properties are limited to urban residential development and uses “consistent by policy” through provisions of the FLUE; Properties “consistent by policy” may be developed as zoned (C-3) and are eligible for conversion of commercial zoning density bonus of up to sixteen (16) DU/A (notwithstanding that the site is in the CHHA). It also lies seaward of the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) boundary. CCME Policy 12.2.5 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) defines the CHHA, “The County shall consider the CHHA as a geographical area lying below the elevation of the Category 1 storm surge line as presently defined in the 2011 Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council’s Hurricane Evacuation Study, or subsequently authorized storm surge or evacuation planning studies coordinated 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: CPSS-19-10 Vanderbilt Beach Rd stff rprt_FNLLL2 (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Underlined text proposed to be added; struck-through text proposed to be deleted. H:\2016\2016025\WP\SSGMPA\Initial Submittal\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit IV.B.1. VBRMUSD GMPA Language (rev 5-29-2020) .docx Page 3 by the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services and approved by the Board of County Commissioners.” The CHHA Overlay in the FLUE states, in part, “The CHHA boundary is generally depicted on the Future Land Use Map and is more precisely shown in the Future Land Use Map series; all lands lying seaward of that boundary are within the CHHA. The Capital Improvement Element and Conservation and Coastal Management Element both contain policies pertaining to the expenditure of public funds for public facilities within the CHHA.” Here, the CHHA Overlay has the effect of limiting maximum density to sixteen (16) DU/A. By example, this proposal also requests that the parts of the CHHA that limit density and would otherwise cap the number of residential units be exceptions from the FLUE’s Density Rating System (DRS). The key provisions of the DRS that would otherwise add or subtract residential density are: 2. Density Bonuses Consistency with the following characteristics may add to the base density. Density bonuses are discretionary, not entitlements, and are dependent upon meeting the criteria for each bonus provision and compatibility with surrounding properties, as well as the rezone criteria in the Land Development Code. a. Conversion of Commercial Zoning Bonus: If a project includes the conversion of commercial zoning that has been found to be “Consistent By Policy” through the Collier County Zoning Re-evaluation Program (Ordinance No. 90-23), then a bonus of up to 16 dwelling units per acre may be added for every one (1) acre of commercial zoning that is converted to residential zoning. These bonus dwelling units may be distributed over the entire project. The project must be compatible with surrounding land uses. 3. Density Reduction Consistency with the following characteristic would subtract density: a. Coastal High Hazard Area If the project lies within the Coastal High Hazard Area, one dwelling unit per gross acre shall be subtracted from the eligible base density of four dwelling units per acre – except for those properties within the Coastal High Hazard Area in Section 1, Township 50 South, Range 25 East. The Coastal High Hazard Area boundary is generally shown on the Future Land Use Map and is more precisely shown in the Future Land Use Map series; all lands lying seaward of that boundary are within the Coastal High Hazard Area. These provisions would amount to a maximum density of no more than sixteen (16) DU/A, or 87 residential units. Density above this is an ask. The subject property also lies within the boundaries of the Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA). Certain FLUE Policies under TCMAs may not be applicable or evaluated on a link by link basis. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: CPSS-19-10 Vanderbilt Beach Rd stff rprt_FNLLL2 (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Underlined text proposed to be added; struck-through text proposed to be deleted. H:\2016\2016025\WP\SSGMPA\Initial Submittal\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit IV.B.1. VBRMUSD GMPA Language (rev 5-29-2020) .docx Page 4 Surrounding Lands: North: The Future Land Use Map designates land immediately north of the subject property as Urban Residential Subdistrict. It is zoned RSF-3 and is developed with [a portion of] Barefoot Pelican Condominiums and constitutes [a portion of] the Lagoon. East: The Future Land Use Map designates land located east of the subject property, Urban Residential Subdistrict. This area is zoned C-3 and is developed with [a portion of] Barefoot Pelican Condominiums and a business office. South: The Future Land Use Map designates land lying south of the subject property as Urban Residential Subdistrict. This area is zoned Pelican Bay Planned Unit Development (PUD) and is developed with this planned development, including the Vanderbilt Beach Parking Structure. West: The Future Land Use Map designates land west of the subject property as Urban Residential Subdistrict. This area is zoned as Residential Tourist - Vanderbilt Beach Residential Tourist Overlay and is developed with beachfront residential development. In summary, Vanderbilt Beach Road defines the boundary between the Urban-designated Residential area and the Coastal Urban-designated Residential area. The existing and planned land uses, and current zoning, in the area immediately surrounding the subject property are primarily residential tourist-based. Criteria for GMP Amendments in Florida Statutes The data and analysis requirements for comprehensive plans and plan amendments are noted in Chapter 163, F.S., specifically as listed below. Identification and Analysis of the Pertinent Criteria in Florida Statutes, Chapter 163.3187, to Qualify as a Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan (GMP) Amendment: The process for adoption of small-scale comprehensive plan amendment requires (in part) the following statutory standards be met, [followed by staff analysis in bracketed text]. (1) A small scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 10 acres or fewer. [The amendment pertains to a 5.42-acre± property.] (b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government’s comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site-specific small scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with, the small scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment involves site-specific Future Land Use text and map changes.] (c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern, unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004(3), and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05(1). [The subject property is not within an Area of Critical State Concern.] 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: CPSS-19-10 Vanderbilt Beach Rd stff rprt_FNLLL2 (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Underlined text proposed to be added; struck-through text proposed to be deleted. H:\2016\2016025\WP\SSGMPA\Initial Submittal\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit IV.B.1. VBRMUSD GMPA Language (rev 5-29-2020) .docx Page 5 (4) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to s. 163.3177. [The amendment preserves the internal consistency between and among GMP elements.] Section 163.3177(1)(f), Florida Statutes: The process for adoption of a comprehensive plan amendment requires (in part) that plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government, (f) All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. 1. Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, data, and supporting documents for proposed plans and plan amendments shall be made available for public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. Support data or summaries are not subject to the compliance review process, but the comprehensive plan must be clearly based on appropriate data. Support data or summaries may be used to aid in the determination of compliance and consistency. 2. Data must be taken from professionally accepted sources. The application of a methodology utilized in data collection or whether a particular methodology is professionally accepted may be evaluated. However, the evaluation may not include whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Original data collection by local governments is not required. However, local governments may use original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. 3. The comprehensive plan shall be based upon permanent and seasonal population estimates and projections, which shall either be those published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research or generated by the local government based upon a professionally acceptable methodology. The plan must be based on at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections as published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10-year planning period unless otherwise limited under s. 380.05, including related rules of the Administration Commission. Absent physical limitations on population growth, population projections for each municipality, and the unincorporated area within a county must, at a minimum, be reflective of each area’s proportional share of the total county population and the total county population growth. Section 163.3177(6)(a)2. Florida Statutes: The process for adoption of a comprehensive plan amendment requires (in part) that plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies and data regarding the area, 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: CPSS-19-10 Vanderbilt Beach Rd stff rprt_FNLLL2 (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Underlined text proposed to be added; struck-through text proposed to be deleted. H:\2016\2016025\WP\SSGMPA\Initial Submittal\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit IV.B.1. VBRMUSD GMPA Language (rev 5-29-2020) .docx Page 6 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community’s economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Section 163.3177(6)(a)8., Florida Statutes: The process for adoption of a comprehensive plan map amendment [which this is] requires (in part) that plan amendments shall be based analyses of the availability of facilities and services, the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed uses, and of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of the existing subdistricts, overlays and special designations, within which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. (a) A future land use plan element designating proposed future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public facilities, and other categories of the public and private uses of land. The approximate acreage and the general range of density or intensity of use shall be provided for the gross land area included in each existing land use category. The element shall establish the long-term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The data and analysis provided by the petitioner included surrounding heights and densities. Appropriateness of the Site and the Change: 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: CPSS-19-10 Vanderbilt Beach Rd stff rprt_FNLLL2 (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Underlined text proposed to be added; struck-through text proposed to be deleted. H:\2016\2016025\WP\SSGMPA\Initial Submittal\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit IV.B.1. VBRMUSD GMPA Language (rev 5-29-2020) .docx Page 7 The requested amendment will allow for nearly double the residential density, from 16 residential units per acre (UPA) to 31.7 UPA, along with a small amount of commercial square footage and a marina. Petitioner’s Residential Needs Analysis: A typical residential needs analysis was not provided. The petitioner submitted a Justification & Supplemental Information, dated May 29, 2020 (Exhibit V.D.1). In this document, one can find the applicant’s information regarding the residential uses proposed. Traffic Capacity/Traffic Circulation Impact Analysis, Including Transportation Element Consistency Determination: JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis (Exhibit V.E.3), updated to March 5, 2019. Collier County Transportation Planning staff reviewed the Analysis and provide the following [bracketed] evaluation: [Capacity is available on County roadways to accommodate (traffic generated by) this project; therefore, the proposal is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element. The companion PUD document for this commercial project contains a developer commitment limiting the maximum number of p.m. peak hour two-way trips under any development scenario.] [Michael Sawyer, Project Manager Transportation Planning Section] Environmental Impacts: The subject property is 5.42 +/- acres and site is developed with a snack shop, convenience store, multi-family residential building, and various surface parking lots. It is not designated as being located within a County Wellfield Protection Area. Collier County Development Review Division staff reviewed the Report and provide the following [bracketed] evaluation: [The subject property is 5.42 acres. The acreage of native vegetation on site has been field verified by staff during review of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the project. The project is currently zoned Commercial (C-3). The proposed GMP amendment will not affect the requirements of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the GMP. Native vegetation on site will be retained in accordance with the requirements of CCME Policy 6.1.1 and LDC section 3.05.07. The petition also includes a proposed marina, which will require a review for consistency with the Manatee Protection Plan in accordance with CCME Policy 7.2.1 and LDC section 5.05.02 at time of site development (SDP) review.] [Craig Brown, Environmental Specialist, Environmental Planning Section Development Review Division] One can find applicant’s information regarding the CCME Objectives 6.3 and 7.2, submitted as Justification & Supplemental Information, regarding the County’s Manatee Protection Plan, and Marina Siting Criteria. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: CPSS-19-10 Vanderbilt Beach Rd stff rprt_FNLLL2 (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Underlined text proposed to be added; struck-through text proposed to be deleted. H:\2016\2016025\WP\SSGMPA\Initial Submittal\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit IV.B.1. VBRMUSD GMPA Language (rev 5-29-2020) .docx Page 8 Public Facilities Impacts: The petitioner submitted a Public Facilities Report, dated May 21, 2019 (Exhibit V.E.1). Staff reviewed the Report and provide the following [bracketed] remarks: • Potable Water and Wastewater Treatment Systems: The subject property lies within the service areas of the Collier County Water-Sewer District’s regional water treatment plant and North County Water Reclamation Facility. Both plants have adequate treatment capacity to treat wastewater generated by this project, and this project will not have a significant impact on potable water and wastewater treatment systems, as defined in CIE Policy 1.2. The site is within an area identified in the 2019 AUIR as having a known wastewater collection/transmission system constraint, which will be addressed in FY 2021-2022 with construction of Master Pump Station (MPS) 101.12 and associated piping. The PUD for this project will include a commitment to connect to the collection system tributary to this new master pump station to avoid overloading Pump Station 101.05 and its collection system, which presently convey wastewater from the properties in the Vanderbilt Beach Center subdivision. Sanitary sewer facilities throughout the Collier County Water-Sewer District are designed to be watertight. Therefore, sewer systems constructed in the Coastal High Hazard Area have no special requirements pursuant to Policy 12.2.6.] [Eric Fey, P.E., Senior Project Manager Public Utilities Department] • Solid Waste Collection & Disposal: The solid waste disposal service provider is Collier County Solid Waste Management. The 2019 AUIR notes that the County projects more than 50 years of remaining landfill capacity [as does the pending 2020 AUIR]. • Stormwater Management System: The Facilities Report indicates stormwater retention and detention will comply with the SFWMD requirements, and, State and County standards for off-site [stormwater] discharges will be met. • Emergency Medical (EMS) and Fire Rescue Services: The subject property is located within the North Naples Fire & Rescue District, who’s collocated EMS/fire station is located on the south side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 1.0 miles to the east. • Schools and school-related facilities, and parks and recreational facilities were evaluated for their impacts by the proposed amendment as part of companion PUD submittal materials. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS The application team held a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) at the Saint John the Evangelist Catholic Church, Ballroom, 625 111th Avenue North, Naples on Tuesday, March 3, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. as required by the LDC. This NIM was advertised, noticed and held jointly for this GMP amendment petition and companion One Naples MPUD rezone petition (PL20190000697). Approximately 450 people other than the application team (inc. engineering and audio and video technicians) and County staff attended. On behalf of the applicants, Brian Stock, CEO, from Stock Development, Keith Gelder, Vice President of Land Development, from Stock Development, Chris Johnson, Director of Land Development, from Stock Development, Claudine Leger-Wetzel, Vice President of Sales and Marketing, from Stock 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: CPSS-19-10 Vanderbilt Beach Rd stff rprt_FNLLL2 (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Underlined text proposed to be added; struck-through text proposed to be deleted. H:\2016\2016025\WP\SSGMPA\Initial Submittal\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit IV.B.1. VBRMUSD GMPA Language (rev 5-29-2020) .docx Page 9 Development, Robert Hall, AIA, President, from CGHJ Architects, Christopher Mitchel, PE, Vice President of Operations, from JRE Engineering, James Banks, PE, President, from JMB Transportation, Richard Yovanovich, Esq., from Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, PA, Robert Mulhere, FAICP, President, from Hole Montes, Hunter Booth, President, from Booth Design Group, and Tina McCain, from Matte, Gravina, Smith Matte & Arnold. County representatives, James French, Deputy Department Head, from the Growth Management Department, Ray Bellows, AICP, Zoning Manager, from the Zoning Services Section, James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner, from the Zoning Services Section, and Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, from the Comprehensive Planning Section, Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, were in attendance. Mr. Mulhere started the presentation by introducing himself, the other consultants, and County staff. He explained the NIM process, process for approval, and provided an estimated hearing & project timeline. Claudine Leger-Wetzel introduced key participants in this project, gave a brief history of Stock Development companies, and an overview of existing Stock Development residential communities. The promotional video prepared for this project was shown. Brian Stock explained how the (bulk of the) property was acquired through public bid in 2015, after being underdeveloped and unavailable for many years. Additional properties were acquired to assemble the contiguous property now being considered. He described a highly amenitized ‘luxury’ project, with rental units that will be long-term lease restricted. Jim Banks gave an overview of 240 residential / 25,000 commercial split = 275 PM peak hr. trips; the trip capacity on Vanderbilt Beach Rd. and Gulf Shore Drive; how pedestrian traffic at intersections cause vehicular traffic delays, and; how interactions at the parking garage need serious attention. Keith Gelder provided an overview of the project and the history of the site. Mr. Gelder went on to explain the existing C-3 zoning and its permitted uses. He explained the proposed improvements to the surrounding area, specifically landscaping adjacent to South Bay Drive, Gulf Shore Drive, and Vanderbilt Beach Drive; sidewalks, improved street lighting, and bike lanes along the both sides of Southbay Drive; a sidewalk and street lighting along the portion of Gulf Shore Drive adjacent to the property; public art on the property, and then provided an overview of the marina portion of the project. Mr. Banks went to explain that the project team is currently working with Collier County on potential upgrades to the public Vanderbilt Beach Parking Garage to help alleviate traffic on Vanderbilt Drive. These upgrades may include technology that keeps track of available parking, which then broadcasts that information to additional signage along Vanderbilt Beach Road; and operational improvements such as setting up an automated payment booth to allow users to pay when exiting the garage. Mr. Banks then explained the Traffic Impact Statement (TIS), including the fact that under the existing C- 3 zoning the property can support at least 100,000 square feet of a mix of various C-3 uses, including retail, office and restaurant uses./ This would generate approximately 491 PM peak hour trips. Under the proposed MPUD zoning and resulting development scenario of 240 residential dwelling units and 25,000 square feet of retail uses, approximately 275 PM peak hour trips are generated. Mr. Banks then provided a brief summary of the TIS methodology and how trips are calculated. Following the presentation Mr. Yovanovich led a Q & A session from the public. This lasted approximately two hours and included feedback from the public, most of which was general commentary on and various reasons for opposing the project. Most of this feedback focused on the Planned Unit Development, not the Growth Management Plan Amendment, aspects of the request. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: CPSS-19-10 Vanderbilt Beach Rd stff rprt_FNLLL2 (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Underlined text proposed to be added; struck-through text proposed to be deleted. H:\2016\2016025\WP\SSGMPA\Initial Submittal\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit IV.B.1. VBRMUSD GMPA Language (rev 5-29-2020) .docx Page 10 Audience asked about lack of building renderings. They will be shown. A speaker announced County Board members, who are those to be contacted. Beachwalk resident, pointed out this area has traffic problems now; the proposal fails to focus on people who are here, but on changing ‘our ’ quality of life. What’s being proposed, is not justified by what’s in submitted materials. Problems inherent by Vanderbilt Beach Rd. street-width limits; same for Gulf Shore Drive, with biker-cart-pedestrian issues; proposed variances conflict with safety standards. Scenery & improvements to garage area overviewed; read from Stock (development) strategic plan. Serious causes for concern if site is approved and overbuilt; liability to the County if tragedy at site, while only Stock and home-buyers, benefit. School at 111th St., and its surrounding neighborhood to protect. 91st St. and beyond were found not part of the TIS/required traffic study. Traffic issues at The Regatta at Vanderbilt Beach were detailed, with examples of parking, loading/unloading, congestion and emergency situations; Developer forewarned / asked to work within these same type of constraints. Another person observed how people described their traffic experiences; before/after studies are off, people driving to site will not be as pleased with on-road characteristics. Remember to consider the (shorter-term) placement and (longer-term) parking for emergency vehicles. Rich Yovanovich explained the developers are not asking for open space deviations or reductions. One man listed specific unacceptable characteristics; asked that they reduce density, height, landscaping to be more like development is around them; doesn’t fit ‘beach area characteristics’; One woman living near 109th St. and Vanderbilt Beach Rd. highlighted traffic problems; no sidewalks; will dictate more police; tax impacts; absent landlords; Rich Yovanovich countered with an impact fee explanation. One man questioned the number of residential units per floor; The answer was given as 5 residential units/floor in the tall, residential towers; 6 residential units/floor other residential bldgs.; Open space is an issue. Another man warned how too many exemptions are proposed, with a final reminder to appeal to [County] commissioners. Mr. Gelder again provided the timeline for zoning approval and the construction timeline. Summer 2023. The Information Meeting was ended at approximately 8:15 p.m. This synopsis provides the annotated NIM proceedings. An audio recording of the entire Neighborhood Information Meeting is available at CityView Documents and Images site, under the PL2019000697 project number. PowerPoint images and print materials are also copied at this location. [Synopsis prepared by C. Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS • This amendment will allow for an increase to the residential density, from 16 residential units per acre (UPA) to 31.7 UPA. It will limit commercial uses to 10,000 square feet, allow up to 172 residential or hotel units, and a marina. • The site lies within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) Overlay. The FLUE Density Rating System reduces the eligible base density in the CHHA by one – from 4 residential units per acre (UPA) to 3 UPA. The FLUE’s Density Rating System would have the effect of allowing maximum density in the CHHA Overlay to sixteen (16) DU/A. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: CPSS-19-10 Vanderbilt Beach Rd stff rprt_FNLLL2 (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Underlined text proposed to be added; struck-through text proposed to be deleted. H:\2016\2016025\WP\SSGMPA\Initial Submittal\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit IV.B.1. VBRMUSD GMPA Language (rev 5-29-2020) .docx Page 11 • No issues were identified regarding impacts to potable water, wastewater collection and treatment or solid waste collection and disposal services. Schools and school-related facilities, and parks and recreational facilities were evaluated for their impacts by the proposed amendment as part of companion PUD submittal materials. • The requirements of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 12.1.2 will be met when providing 174 cots and one enclosed trailer to County Emergency Management. • The site lies within the Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area, where traffic management strategies are employed to reduce traffic impacts. • Residents attending the Neighborhood Information Meeting expressed a strong consensus opposing development of the property as proposed. • A companion PUD rezone petition has been submitted concurrent with this GMPA petition. The development standards found in the PUD will determine the overall density and intensity of the proposed petition. Any adjustments to the PUD will then be reflected in the proposed GMPA. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS The Office of the County Attorney reviewed this report on September 23, 2020. In addition to pertinent small-scale (GMP) amendment criteria in Florida Statutes, Section 163.3187 addressed above, the criteria for GMP amendments to the FLUE text and map series are in Sections 163.3177(1)(f) and 163.3177(6)(a)2 and 163.3177(6)(a)8, Florida Statutes. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the County Planning Commission forward Petition PL20190000696/CPSS-19-10, to the Board of County Commissioners, with a recommendation to approve for adoption and transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, with the following modifications ‒ as depicted below: Note: Words underlined are added, words struck through are deleted – as proposed by petitioner; words double underlined are added, words double struck through are deleted – as proposed by staff. Italicized text within brackets is explanatory only – not to be adopted. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** URBAN DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Urban designated areas will accommodate the following uses: a. Residential uses including single family, multi-family, duplex, and mobile home. The maximum densities allowed are identified in the Districts, Subdistricts and Overlays that follow, except as allowed by certain policies under Objective 5. b. Non-residential uses including: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** [Page 26] 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: CPSS-19-10 Vanderbilt Beach Rd stff rprt_FNLLL2 (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Underlined text proposed to be added; struck-through text proposed to be deleted. H:\2016\2016025\WP\SSGMPA\Initial Submittal\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\Exhibit IV.B.1. VBRMUSD GMPA Language (rev 5-29-2020) .docx Page 12 12. Commercial uses subject to criteria identified in the Urban - Mixed Use District, PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict, Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict, Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict, Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict, Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict, Davis ‒ Radio Commercial Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict; and, in the Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict, Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict, Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict; Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict, Logan Boulevard/Immokalee Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Seed to Table Commercial Subdistrict, in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay; and, as allowed by certain FLUE policies. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** A. Urban Mixed-Use District [Page 49] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 20. Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Purpose and Intent: The Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Subdistrict (VBRMUSD) is 5.42 +/- acres in size and is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive, in Section 32, Township 48, Range 35. The purpose and intent of the mixed-use Subdistrict is to provide for greater intensity, density, and flexibility in applicable Site Design and Development Standards in order to promote redevelopment of the site with a resort tourism centered project, which shall include a mixture of residential and/or hotel, restaurant, retail, and waterfront marina uses, subject to the following requirements and limitations: 1. The Subdistrict shall be rezoned to Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD); 2. Multi-family residential and/or hotel units, not to exceed 172 total units; 3. A minimum of 40 residential units is required and shall be developed as a component of the initial Site Development Plan (SDP); 4. A maximum of 10,000 square feet of the following uses, as permitted under the C-3 zoning district is allowed: a. Retail; b. Restaurant; c. Personal Services, 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: CPSS-19-10 Vanderbilt Beach Rd stff rprt_FNLLL2 (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Agenda Item 9. ‒ 13 ‒ PL20190000696/CPSS-19-10 Amending a Portion of the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict in the Future Land Use Element d. Professional and Medical Offices 5. A marina, with boat slips limited to use by residents and guests only, except that a maximum of 4 slips may be leased to charter boats for public use, and a ship’s store and marine fueling facility may be open public accessing the site from the water. 6. The MPUD shall include a maximum PM Peak Hour trip cap which will be the overriding limit on any combination of the above uses. *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** B. DENSITY RATING SYSTEM [Page 50] *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** e. All new residential zoning located within Districts, Subdistricts and Overlays identified above that are subject to this Density Rating System shall be consistent with this Density Rating System, except as provided in: 1) Policy 5.3 of the Future Land Use Element. *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** 8) The Mini Triangle Mixed Use Subdistrict. 9) The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay. 10) The Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict (VBRMUSD) *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES [Page 147] *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** Logan Boulevard/Immokalee Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Mini Triangle Mixed Use Subdistrict Map East Tamiami Trail Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Seed to Table Commercial Subdistrict Map Air Curtain Incinerator Facilities Map Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Subdistrict PETITION No.: PL20190000696/CPSS-19-10 Staff Report for the October 1, 2020, CCPC meeting. NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the December 8, 2020, BCC meeting. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: CPSS-19-10 Vanderbilt Beach Rd stff rprt_FNLLL2 (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Exhibit A Ordinance.100720.Vanderbilt Beach Road mixed use sub-district (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Exhibit A Ordinance.100720.Vanderbilt Beach Road mixed use sub-district (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Exhibit A Ordinance.100720.Vanderbilt Beach Road mixed use sub-district (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Exhibit A Ordinance.100720.Vanderbilt Beach Road mixed use sub-district (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Exhibit A Ordinance.100720.Vanderbilt Beach Road mixed use sub-district (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Exhibit A Ordinance.100720.Vanderbilt Beach Road mixed use sub-district (13775 : 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Exhibit A Ordinance.100720.Vanderbilt Beach Road mixed use sub-district (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 25Attachment: CPSS-19-10 hybrid mtg waiver for CCPC 9-17 hearing (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 26Attachment: CPSS-19-10 hybrid mtg waiver for CCPC 9-17 hearing (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use ND-GCI0488876-01 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC)at 9:00 A.M.,October 1st,2020,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples,FL.,to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.89-05,AS AMENDED,THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES BY AMENDING THE URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT,RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT TO ADD THE VA NDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED-USE SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF UP TO 172 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS AND/OR HOTEL ROOMS/SUITES,BUT NO LESS THAN 40 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, AND 10,000 SQUARE FEET OF C-3,COMMERCIAL INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL USES,AND A MARINA AND A SHIP STORE.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF GULF SHORE DRIVE AND VA NDERBILT BEACH ROAD IN SECTION 32,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 25 EAST,CONSISTING OF 5.42 AC RES;AND FURTHERMORE, RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTA L OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.[PL20190000696] All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard.Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk’s offi ce,fourth fl oor,Collier County Government Center,3299 East Ta miami Trail,suite 401,Naples,FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Wr itten comments must be fi led with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to October 1,2020. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic,the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely,as well as in person,during this proceeding.Individuals who would like to participate remotely,should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov.Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting.For additional information about the meeting,please call Thomas Clarke at (239)252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@CollierCountyFL.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Ta miami Tr ail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Offi ce. Collier County Planning Commission Ned Fryer,Chairman Vanderbilt BeachRDVanderbiltDRGulfShoreDR !I Projec t Location GulfofMexico9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: CPSS-19-10 Notice of Intent (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Subdistrict) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 28Attachment: CPSS-19-10 sign locations (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Subdistrict) 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 29Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 30Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 31Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 32Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 33Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 34Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 35Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 36Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 37Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 38Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 39Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 40Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 41Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 42Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 43Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 44Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 45Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 46Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 47Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 48Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 49Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 50Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 51Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 52Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 53Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 54Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 55Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 56Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 57Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 58Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 59Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 60Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 61Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 62Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 63Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 64Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 65Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 66Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 67Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 68Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 69Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 70Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 71Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 72Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 73Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 74Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 75Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 76Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 77Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 78Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 79Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 80Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 81Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 82Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 83Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 84Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 85Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 86Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 87Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 88Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 89Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 90Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 91Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 92Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 93Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 94Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 95Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 96Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 97Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 98Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 99Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 100Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 101Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 102Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 103Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 104Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 105Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 106Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 107Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 110Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 111Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 118Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 119Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- VANDERBILT BEACH MIXED USE ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLEMENT DECEMBER 9, 2019 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. MARIELLE KITCHENER 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES, FL 34104 (239) 643-0166 marielle@thanaples.com 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 3.0 NATIVE HABITAT 6 4.0 WETLANDS & OTHER SURFACE WATERS 7 5.0 LISTED SPECIES 8 6.0 SOILS 9 7.0 CREDENTIALS 10 TABLES 1- FLUCCS and Native Vegetation 4 2- Native Habitat Preservation Calculation 6 EXHIBITS 1 Location Map 2 Overall FLUCCS Map 3 FLUCCS Detail 1 Map 4 FLUCCS Detail 2 Map 5 Native Habitat Map 6 Soils Map APPENDICES I Historical Clearing Aerials & Onsite Photographs 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use project will tie a number of parcels together totaling 5.42 acres on the northeast corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Boulevard. The lots which were specifically located in Section 32, Township 28 South, Range 25 East, in Collier County are currently occupied by a mix of commercial businesses, restaurants, hotel, multi-family development, marina and open land. Many of the parcels are currently in a state of inactivity or are being used for parking or storage. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing structures and create an updated project that will include all of the existing uses, but also add a public commercial waterfront component. In order to comply with the Collier County Land Development Code Resource Protection section 3.05.07 and the Collier County Growth Management Plan: Conservation and Coastal Management Element Goals 6 and 7, the following Supplement addresses the various environmental issues as it pertains to the proposed project. 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 4 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The majority of the project site is either grassed, paved, or contains existing/recently removed structures. A small operational marina exists on the northwest corner of the site and a few of the remaining apartments along the eastern shoreline are still inhabited by renters. There were also planted trees staggered around many of the parcels which were established to comply with County landscape buffer codes around the parking areas (trees on specific spacing and hedged plants underneath). Most plants onsite were not singled-out specifically because they were installed as buffer and did not constitute native habitat as defined in 3.05.07, but there were exceptions discussed below and in section 3.0 of this document. Native vegetation for this project consists of plants which have naturally recruited along the section of natural shoreline over the past decades. Table 1 below contains a list of habitat classifications according to the Florida Land Use, Cover, Forms and Classification System manual, with descriptions of any code that is not self- explanatory. Table 1- FLUCCS and Native Vegetation FLUCCS Code Description Acreage Native Habitat 1333 Quadraplex Units <2 Stories 0.25 0.00 147 Mixed Commercial/Services 0.69 0.00 190 Open Land 1.83 0.00 194 Parking 1.10 0.00 520 Water 0.02 0.00 1841 Marina 0.40 0.00 322 Shrub- <25% groundcover 0.01 0.01 422 Brazilian pepper 0.02 0.00 426 Tropical hardwoods 0.05 0.05 428 Cabbage palm 0.005 0.005 612 Mangrove 0.04 0.04 740 Disturbed 0.60 0.00 814 Roadway 0.41 0.00 5.425 0.105 190: Open Land (1.83 Acres) These areas were designated as such because they were initially cleared during the 1950s creation of Vanderbilt Lagoon and have either been maintained as grassed lots since or built on 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 5 and recently scraped down (See historical aerials in Appendix I). Any vegetation on these lots was installed to satisfy county building codes for final CO’s or landscape buffers. 194: Parking (1.10 Acres) Some of the areas designated as 194 have native trees present, but onsite it becomes evident they were either installed for CO of a structure or a vegetation buffer per county code and not as native preserve. See Appendix I for photo example. 1841: Marina (0.04 Acres) There is a parcel on the northwest corner of the project with docks which still supports a fishing charter service and a few usable commercial boat slips known as South Bay Marina & Fishing Charter. The marina was more commercially active prior to Hurricane Irma, but much of its functionality was lost with the storm and now it is used primarily for commercial charters. 322: Shrub- <25% Groundcover (0.01 Acres) Common name (Scientific name) Percent Cover Stratum coinvine (Dalbergia brownei) 90 Mid buttonwood (Conocarpus erectus) 4 Can & Mid seagrape (Coccoloba uvifera) 1 Can, Mid & Ground 426: Tropical hardwood (0.05 Acres) Common name (Scientific name) Percent Cover Stratum buttonwood (Conocarpus erectus) 20 Can & Mid silver buttonwood (Conocarpus erectus var. sericeus) 20 Mid coinvine (Dalbergia brownei) 35 Mid & Ground seagrape (Coccoloba uvifera) 25 Mid 428 Cabbage palm (0.005 Acres) Common name (Scientific name) Percent Cover Stratum cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto) 98 Can & Mid strangler fig (Ficus aurea) 1 Mid banana tree (Musa spp.) 1 Mid 612 Mangrove (0.04 Acres) Common name (Scientific name) Percent Cover Stratum white (Laguncularia racemosa) 40 Can, Mid & Ground red (Rhizophora mangle) 30 Mid and Ground black (Avicennia germinans) 8 Mid and Ground coinvine (Dalbergia brownei) 5 Mid Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) 5 Mid 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 6 3.0 NATIVE HABITAT Per the CCME of the GMP (Policy 6.1.1), since the project site lies within an Urban Designated Area minimum native vegetation retention standards apply. This project also lies within the Coastal High Hazard Area and is greater than 2.5 acres in size, so 25% of the native vegetation must be preserved. In the case of this site 25% of the native habitat equates to 0.11 acres (See Tables 1 and 2) and thus is not considered a viable onsite preserve. Under county standards (LDC 3.05.07 H.1.(f)(i)(a and d) and 3.05.07 H.1.(f)(iv.) and following the GMP Policy 6.1.1 (10) we are proposing an offsite monetary payment in lieu of onsite preservation. Table 2- Native Vegetation Retention Calculations FLUCCS Acres Native Vegetation % Required to Retain Preservation Total 322 0.01 25 0.0025 Acres 426 0.05 25 0.0125 Acres 428 0.005 25 0.00125 Acres 612 0.04 25 0.01 Acres 0.02625 Acres (0.03) Per GMP 6.1.1 (8) remaining lands and/or vegetation onsite will not be included in the Native Vegetation totals since they are either planted with county required landscape buffers or were cleared and maintained with the creation of Vanderbilt Lagoon. Open land (FLUCCS 190) along Vanderbilt Beach Road has been maintained in a cleared manner since the 1950s and was used by Collier County in 2005 as a staging area for the construction of the beach parking garage across the street (See Appendix I). 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 7 4.0 WETLANDS & OTHER SURFACE WATERS Due to historical land use the only wetland features were found along a length of shoreline where no seawall was ever constructed. That habitat consisted entirely of mangroves with minor amounts of Brazilian pepper present. In most cases the mangroves were dominated by white mangrove (Laguncularia racemosa) or red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle) depending on the location, but some black mangrove (Avicennia germinans) was also present. Rip rap along the non-seawalled shoreline was sporadic. Ownership of 0.08 acres of natural mangrove shoreline and portions of the existing waterway bottomlands were recently reclaimed by the project under a state Butler Act filing approved by the Governor & Cabinet. Natural shoreline is expected to be filled during seawall installation and for the purposes of structural upland engineering. Likely there will be mangrove and/or oyster habitat created though later in association with water quality improvements and mitigation pertaining to the future marina permitting. 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 8 5.0 LISTED SPECIES No listed species (or nests, dens, burrows, cavities, etc.) were found to be utilizing this site and none would be expected because of current site uses and limited area of native habitat. When federal and state permitting commences the site will be subjected to review for the following species by its location, though none of these species will be an issue for this particular site: • Scrub Jay • Piping Plover • Crocodile • Bonneted Bat (not focal area) National Marine Fisheries will also review for small sea turtles and small-tooth sawfish with regards to future marina plans. Per GMP Policy 7.1.1 this project is not proposing any non-compatible land uses listed therein: Conservation designation on the future land use maps, Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Overlay (ACSC), Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPAs), Sending Lands, Habitat Stewardship Areas (HSAs) or all other policies supported by Objective 7.1. Most of LDC 3.04.01 is not applicable to this project because of the historical uses and lack of habitat for wildlife species. 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 9 6.0 SOILS Soils on this site were designated as 35- Urban Land-Aquents Complex, Organic Substratum according to the Collier County Soil Survey. The unit is described below. (35) Urban Land-Aquents Complex, Organic Substratum- This unit consists of soil materials that have been dug from different areas in the county and have been spread over the muck soils for coastal urban development. Individual areas were black to irregular in shape and range from 20 to 300 acres in size. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Typically, urban land consists of commercial buildings, houses, parking lots, streets, sidewalks, recreational areas, shopping centers and other urban structures where the soil cannot be observed. The depth of this fill material varies from 30 to more than 80 inches. Muck of various thicknesses underlies the fill material, with mineral material under the muck. No one pedon represents Aquents, but a commonly encountered profile has a mixed yellowish brown, light gray, and grayish brown fine sand surface with about 15 percent limestone gravels and shell fragments to a depth of 38 inches. Below this to a depth of 80 inches or more is dark reddish-brown compressed muck. In 90 percent of the areas mapped as this unit, urban land makes up 60 to 75 percent and Aquents makes up 26 to 40 percent of the map unit. Included were areas that lack gravelly fill and may contain layers of sandy loam or sandy clay loam fill. The depth to the water table varies with the amount of fill material and the extent of artificial drainage within any mapped area. Present land use precludes use of this map unit for other uses. On site soil investigation were helpful in determining suitability of vacant areas for dwellings, roads and small commercial buildings. This map unit has not been assigned a capability subclass. 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 10 7.0 CREDENTIALS Fieldwork and preceding documentation contained within this Environmental Supplement for the Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use project was completed by Marielle Nageon de Lestang of Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. at 3584 Exchange Avenue, Naples, Florida, 34104. Marielle received a Bachelor of Science degree from Alabama A&M University in Environmental Science and has been a Biologist with Turrell, Hall & Associates since 1997 in Collier County. 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- Exhibit 1 Location Map 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 016'5 <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE: N 26°15'18.11"N<> LONGITUDE: W 81°49'16.28"W5+6'#&&4'55 <> SOUTHBAY DRIVENAPLES, FL 34108REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg LOCATION 1/25/2017THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ01-23-171622-LOCATION-------------------01 OF 06)7.(1(/':+%1)7.(1(/':+%18588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWSUBJECTPROPERTYKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLES9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 131Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – Exhibit 2 Overall FLUCCS Map 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg 1/25/2017NESW0 60 120240SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg OVERALL FLUCCS 1/25/2017THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ01-23-171622-OVERALL FLUCCS MAP-------------------02 OF 6SOUTHBAY DRVANDERBILT LAGOONCENTER STSOUTHBAY DRGULF SHORE CTCENTER STGULF SHORE DRVANDERBILT BEACH RD19419019414719019419019413331901901333194190133318411451 14158141333SEE SHEET 03FOR DETAILSEE SHEET 04FOR DETAILPROJECTBOUNDARY9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 133Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – Exhibit 3 FLUCCS Detail 1 Map 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg 1/25/2017NESW0 5 1020SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg FLUCCS 1 1/25/2017THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ01-23-171622-FLUCCS DETAIL 1 MAP-------------------03 OF 06422•SURVEY COURTESY OF:••SURVEY DATED:NOTES:•THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYY426612FLUCCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(SF)422BRAZILIAN PEPPER971426TROPIC HARDWOODS380612MANGROVE SWAMPS92TOTAL14439.A.1.fPacket Pg. 135Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – Exhibit 4 FLUCCS Detail 2 Map 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg 1/25/2017NESW0 10 2040SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg FLUCCS 2 1/25/2017THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ01-23-171622-FLUCCS DETAIL 2 MAP-------------------04 OF 06428•SURVEY COURTESY OF:••SURVEY DATED:NOTES:•THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYY612426322612FLUCCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(SF)322COINVINE645426TROPIC HARDWOODS1688428CABBAGE PALM202520WATER786612MANGROVE SWAMPS1599TOTAL49205209.A.1.fPacket Pg. 137Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – Exhibit 5 Native Habitat Map 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg 1/25/2017NESW0 60 120240SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg NATIVE 1/25/2017THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JMSPC5/6/20161622-NATIVE HABITAT MAP-------------------05 OF 06SOUTHBAY DRVANDERBILT LAGOONCENTER STGULF SHORE CTCENTER STGULF SHORE DRVANDERBILT BEACH RD19419019414719019419019413331901901333194190133318411451 14158141333NATIVE VEGETATION0.11 ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION.GMP REQUIRES 25%PRESERVATION OF NATIVEVEGETATION. FOR THIS SITE, AMINIMUM OF 0.03 ACRES OFNATIVE VEGETATION MUST BEPRESERVED.NATIVE HABITATPROJECTBOUNDARY9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 139Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – Exhibit 6 Soils Map 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg 1/25/2017NESW0 60 120240SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg SOILS 1/25/2017THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ01-23-171622-SOILS MAP-------------------07 OF 06SOUTHBAY DRVANDERBILT LAGOONCENTER STGULF SHORE CTCENTER STGULF SHORE DRVANDERBILT BEACH RD35CODEDESCRIPTIONHYDRIC35URBAN LAND-AQUENTS COMPLEX,ORGANIC SUBSTRATUMPROJECTBOUNDARY9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 141Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – APPENDIX I Historical Aerials & Onsite Photos 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 12/9/2019NESW0 100 200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 1952 12/9/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ12-05-191622-3225ONE NAPLES1952 HISTORICAL AERIAL48-------------------019.A.1.fPacket Pg. 143Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 12/9/2019NESW0 100 200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 1962 12/9/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:TTTRMJ12-05-191622-3225ONE NAPLES1962 HISTORIC AERIAL48-------------------029.A.1.fPacket Pg. 144Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 12/9/2019NESW0 100 200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 1968 12/9/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ12-05-191622-3225ONE NAPLES1968 HISTORICAL AERIAL48-------------------039.A.1.fPacket Pg. 145Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 12/9/2019NESW0 100 200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 2006 12/9/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ12-09-191622-3225ONE NAPLES2006 AERIAL48-------------------049.A.1.fPacket Pg. 146Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – Parking area designated as FLUCCS Code 194 on corner of Southbay Drive & Vanderbilt Beach Road (facing south to Vanderbilt) Area designated as FLUCCS Code 190 as seen facing west from the parking lot at Corner of Southbay & Vanderbilt. Currently being utilized for overflow parking 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 148Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 149Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 150Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 151Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 152Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 153Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 154Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 155Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 156Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 157Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 158Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 159Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 161Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 162Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 163Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 164Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 165Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 166Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 168Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 169Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 170Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 171Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 172Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 174Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 175Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 176Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 177Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 178Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 179Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 180Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 181Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 182Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 183Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 184Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 185Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 186Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 187Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 188Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 189Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 190Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 191Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 192Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 193Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 194Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 195Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 196Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 197Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 198Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 199Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 200Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 201Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 202Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 203Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 204Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 205Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 206Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 207Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 208Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 209Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 210Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 211Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 212Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 213Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 214Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 215Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 216Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 217Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 218Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 219Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 220Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 221Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 222Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 223Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 224Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 225Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 226Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 227Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 228Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 229Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 230Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 231Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 232Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 233Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 234Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 235Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 236Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 237Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 265Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 266Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 267Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 268Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 269Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 270Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 271Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 272Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 273Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 274Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 275Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 276Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 277Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 278Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 279Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 280Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 281Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 282Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.fPacket Pg. 283Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – GMPA – Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed- 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Vanderbilt Beach Road MU Subdistrict Application and Backup (13775 : PL20190000696 – 10/15/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.2 Item Summary: ***Note: This item was continued from the October 1, 2020 CCPC meeting to the October 15, 2020 CCPC meeting.*** PL20190000697 PUDZ -An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Commercial Intermediate district (C-3) zoning district to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as One Naples MPUD, to allow construction of up to 172 multi-family dwelling units and/or hotel rooms/suites, but no less than 40 residential units, up to 208 feet in height including a parking deck, and 10,000 square feet of C-3, commercial intermediate commercial uses, and a marina and a ship store. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road in Section 32, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, consisting of 5.42 ± acres; and by providing an effective date. (Companion Item PL20190000696) [Coordinator: James Sabo, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 10/15/2020 Prepared by: Title: Operations Analyst – Planning Commission Name: Diane Lynch 10/01/2020 6:11 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 10/01/2020 6:11 PM Approved By: Review: Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Skipped 10/01/2020 6:02 PM Zoning Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 10/01/2020 6:02 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 10/01/2020 6:02 PM Zoning Diane Lynch Additional Reviewer Skipped 10/01/2020 6:02 PM Growth Management Department Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 10/01/2020 6:02 PM Zoning Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 10/01/2020 6:02 PM Planning Commission Edwin Fryer Meeting Pending 10/15/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 290 MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 1 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 1, 2020 SUBJECT: MPUD-PL20190000697 ONE NAPLES MPUD COMPANION GMPA, PL20190000696-CPSS-2019-10 COMPANION RIGHT-OF-WAY VAC, PL20200000368 ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owner: Agents: Vanderbilt Naples Holdings, LLC 2639 Professional Circle Suite 101 Naples, FL 34119 Applicant: Vanderbilt Naples Holdings, LLC 2639 Professional Circle Suite 101 Naples, FL 34119 Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, V.P. Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Richard Yovanovich, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich, Koester 4001 Tamiami Trail N. suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone a property from C-3 Commercial Intermediate Zoning District to Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) One Naples. The property consists of two parcels created from several small lots. There is a companion application for right-of-way vacations for Gulf Shore Court between Southbay and Vanderbilt Beach Road, a portion of Center Street, and a public alleyway from Southbay Drive to Gulf Shore Court. Additionally, there is a companion Small Scale GMPA for 5.42 acres related to this request. The total acreage for the MPUD rezoning request is 5.42 acres. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at the northeast corner of Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road in Section 32, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County (see location map, page 2). The proposed Master Plan is included in the PUD Ordinance, and as Attachment B. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 2 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 9.A.2.aPacket Pg. 292Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 3 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property consists of two aggregated parcels. The north parcel consists of platted lots fronting the Vanderbilt Lagoon on the north side of Southbay Drive (Lots 11-32, Block A, Vanderbilt Beach Center Subdivision). The south parcel is larger and consists of platted lots in Block D of the Vanderbilt Beach Center Subdivision. The applicant proposes to vacate portions of the rights-of-way for Gulfshore Court and Center Street. A connector road similar to Gulfshore Court is proposed between Southbay and Vanderbilt Beach Road. The parcels and the proposed right-of-way vacation make up the 5.42 acres of the proposed Subdistrict and MPUD requested development area. The site is presently zoned C-3, Commercial Intermediate. The applicant proposes 172 residential or hotel units, up to 10,000 square feet of commercial uses, a marina with a fuel dock, and a ship’s store. The applicant proposes to redevelop both parcels north and south. On the north parcel, the applicant proposes to develop two mid-rise residential buildings on Tract 3 and Tract 4 fronting on the Vanderbilt Lagoon. The buildings are 5 stories over 1 level of parking with 20 units per building. (Note: the PUD Ordinance does not indicate the number of units for Tract 3 and 4) The building height is 55-feet zoned and 87-feeet actual height. A marina is proposed at the Vanderbilt Lagoon frontage for the Tract 3 and 4 buildings, which is primarily limited to residents and guests. A maximum of 4 transient slips may be permitted and leased to charter boats. A ship’s store and fuel dock are proposed as well. On the south parcel at the northwest corner of Southbay Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road, the applicant proposes to develop one mid-rise residential building on Tract 2 fronting on Southbay and Vanderbilt Beach Road. The building is 5 stories over 1 level of parking with 30 units residential units. The building height is 55-feet zoned and 77-feet actual height. On the south parcel at the northeast corner of Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road, the applicant proposes to develop two high-rise residential tower buildings on Tract 1 fronting on Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. The tower buildings are 14 stories over 2 levels of parking deck with 102 residential or hotel units. The building height is 182-feet zoned and 208- feet actual height. The residential towers are proposed to be constructed above a two-level parking structure. There are commercial uses proposed on Tract 1, including up to 10,000 s.f. for the following uses: retail, restaurant, personal services, and professional office. All proposed buildings for the project include recreational uses, such as pools and fitness centers as permitted accessory uses. Please note that the applicant’s proposal is conceptual, and the PUD Ordinance does not limit the number of buildings and units for each Tract. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Restaurant-Hotel, Vanderbilt Lagoon, zoned CPUD and RSF-3ST South: Hotel-Restaurant, Residential (high-rise), zoned Pelican Bay PUD 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 4 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 East: Residential condominium Barefoot Pelican, Vanderbilt Palms, zoned, C-3 West: Residential condominium Beachmoor, zoned RT-VBRTO overlay district Aerial Map (County GIS) The surrounding dwellings unit counts, and adjacent PUD densities are listed here: Miralia PUD (Regatta) – 23.44 DU/A Pelican Bay PUD – 3.7 DU/A Residential Unit Counts from the Collier County Appraiser: Admiralty of Vanderbilt Beach 12 units Barefoot Pelican 60 units Floridian Club (East) N/A Floridian Club (West) N/A Gulf Pointe 15 units Lighthouse Inn N/A Phoenician Sands 10 units Regatta at Vanderbilt Beach I 92 units Regatta at Vanderbilt Beach II 61 units Regatta at Vanderbilt Beach III 79 units 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 5 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 Sausalito of Naples 7 units Seawatch 26 units The Beachmoor 33 units The Vanderbilt 19 units The Watermark 22 units Vanderbilt B Harbour Club (East) 18 units Vanderbilt B Harbour Club (West) 26 units Vanderbilt Beach Motel N/A Vanderbilt Beach Motel Condo 16 units Vanderbilt Hideaway 15 units Vanderbilt Palms 28 units A density map of the surrounding PUD projects and a Residential Unit Count map of surrounding properties have been included as Attachment C and D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: A companion petition [PL20190000696/CPSS-2019-10] Small Scale Growth Management Plan (GMPA) Amendment application has been submitted for 5.42 acres to rezone property from the C-3, Commercial Intermediate Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). The amendment seeks to allow up to 172 multi-family residential dwelling units or hotel units, up to 10,000 square feet of commercial uses, and to increase the allowable density from 16 DU/A to 31.7 DU/A. Additionally, petition [PL20190000696/CPSS-2019-10] seeks to establish a new mixed-use Subdistrict in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and map series for the subject property. CONCLUSION FOR GMP CONSISTENCY Due to the request for increased density from the maximum allowed density of 16 DU/A to 31.7 DU/A, the petition is not consistent with the adopted GMP, therefore the petitioner submitted the companion GMPA PL20190000696/CPSS-2019-10 for consideration. The MPUD petition may be deemed consistent if and when, the companion GMP amendment petition PL20190000696/CPSS-2019-10 is adopted and goes into effect. The PUD Ordinance needs to provide for the effective date consistent with the effective date of the companion GMP amendment petition. The Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review Memo has been included as Attachment E. Transportation Element: The Transportation Division evaluation and staff review section is a separate document and included as Attachment F. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 0.11 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 0.03 acres (25%) of native vegetation is required to be preserved. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 6 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC’s recommendation. Drainage: The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage will be addressed through the environmental resource permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will also evaluate the project’s stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of site development plan (SDP) and if needed, platting (PPL). Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition to address environmental concerns. The property was cleared in 1962 and consists of developed and vacant parcels. The Master Concept Plan illustrates the minimum PUD preserve requirement will be addressed offsite in accordance with LDC 3.05.07.H.1.f. The required preserve is 0.03 acres (25% of 0.11 acres). No listed animal or plant species were observed on the property. The applicant has proposed to remove existing docking facilities and construct a new multi-slip docking facility. The property is located adjacent to Vanderbilt Lagoon, a man-altered waterbody. In accordance with LDC section 5.05.02, all proposed multi-slip docking facilities with ten or more slips are required to be reviewed for consistency with the Manatee Protection Plan (MPP). The MPP has been adopted by the Board of County Commissioners and approved by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) in 1995. The MPP has been established to provide protection for manatees by limiting slip counts in sensitive marine habitat and improving manatee awareness. The marina citing criteria establishes three rankings for proposed multi-slip docking facilities: “Preferred,” “Moderate,” and “Protected.” The rankings are determined based on an analysis of the water depth, impact to native marine habitat and manatee use. The ranking outcome establishes the maximum slip count allowed for a proposed multi-slip docking facility. The ranking will be determined with the submittal of a Manatee Awareness and Protection Plan Consistency Determination at the time of site development review. Transportation Review: Transportation staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP with the proposed Transportation Planning Staff condition of approval and therefore recommends approval of the One Naples PUDZ PL20190000697, and further recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward the petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval with the following condition of approval: Transportation Planning condition of approval: Developer commitment 2.B.i. shall include a right-turn lane for northbound Gulf Shore Drive. This condition is in addition to the Developer Commitment for design and installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Gul f Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. Therefore, it expands the Developer Commitment to a traffic signal and northbound right-turn lane. Commitment 2.B.i can be found at the bottom of page 9 in the proposed PUD ordinance. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 7 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 Landscape Review: The applicant is requesting one deviation pertaining to landscape requirements. See deviation discussion below. The landscape buffers labeled on the Master Plan (Exhibit C-1) of the PUD Ordinance are consistent with the LDC except for the SW corner of the property where the applicant is seeking a deviation. Within the buffers labeled on the Master Plan, the applicant is proposing enhanced planting above and beyond the requirements of the LDC. These plantings are shown in Exhibit G. The Master Plan does not show a buffer on the northern boundary, adjacent to Vanderbilt Lagoon, because the Development Standards (Exhibit B) include a zero-foot setback adjacent to the waterfront. This is consistent with LDC Section 4.02.05, Specific Design Standards for Waterfront Lots, which allow development to be placed at the water’s edge in order to enhance the character of waterfront development. At time of Site Development Plan submittal, staff will require a Type B Buffer along the waterfront yard in areas that are not developed to the waterfront. The right turn lane onto Gulfshore Drive from Vanderbilt Beach Road required as a condition of approval from transportation staff will require compensating right-of-way. Therefore, a condition of approval is recommended to update the Master Plan, Exhibit G, to reflect the additi onal compensating right-of-way and its impacts on the required landscape buffer. School District: One Naples (PUDZ-PL20190000697) At this time, there is existing or planned capacity within the next 5 years for the proposed development at the elementary, middle, and high school levels. At the time of site plan or plat, the development project would be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity either within the concurrency service area the project is located within or adjacent concurrency service areas. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the north wastewater service area of the Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD. Water and wastewater services are readily available via connections to existing infrastructure on-site and within adjacent rights-of-way. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. The developer has committed to routing wastewater generated by the project to the gravity sewer on Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 400 feet southeast of the project, rather than utilizing the existing collection system that routes flow from Vanderbilt Beach Center to the northwest via the existing gravity sewer on Gulf Shore Drive. The project will necessitate modifications to the existing collection system, and the developer has committed to completing those improvements without interrupting service to existing customers. Furthermore, the developer has agreed that no vertical construction will be permitted within MU Tract 1 before permanent replacement easements are provided pursuant to commitments made for the companion application to vacate (VAC-PL20200000368). Adequate downstream wastewater system capacity must be confirmed at the time of development permit (SDP or PPL) review through a thorough engineering analysis, which will be discussed at a mandatory pre-submittal conference with representatives from the Public Utilities Engineering and Project Management Division and the Growth Management Development Review Division. Any improvements to the Collier County Water-Sewer District’s wastewater collection/transmission system necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 8 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the Collier County Water-Sewer District at no cost to the County at the time of utilities acceptance. Zoning Review: Zoning Division staff has evaluated the proposed uses related to their intensity and scale. The proposed development standards for the project were reviewed. The Zoning Division also evaluated the location and orientation of the existing uses related to the request for PUD rezone. For evaluation and comparison, the Zoning staff has provided examples of permitted uses, conditional uses, and development standards for the existing C-3 Commercial Intermediate zoning district from Section 4.02 of the Land Development Code (LDC). Current Zoning is C-3 Commercial Intermediate: Intent of the district is to provide a wider variety of goods and services for areas expected to receive a higher degree of auto traffic. The variety of good and services provides an opportunity for comparison shopping. The district is intended for planned shopping centers as well. Permitted Uses in C-3: General commercial uses, such as retail merchandise, healthcare offices, banks, religious and other comparable uses. Hotels are not listed as permitted or conditional uses in the C-3 zone district. Conditional Uses in C-3: Auto dealers, drinking places, grocery stores, hospitals, movie theaters, mixed-use commercial and residential and comparable uses determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. Development standards for C-3 (maximum and minimum): Minimum Lot Area—10,000 square feet, meets the standard Minimum Lot Width—75 feet, meets the standard Maximum Building Coverage—None Maximum Building Height commercial—50 feet Minimum Distance Between Buildings—None Minimum Floor Area (first floor)—700 square feet, Floor to Area Ratio—None Maximum Building Height commercial and residential-mixed-use—±76 feet (FEMA first floor 12 feet NAVD), including 10 feet for mechanical equipment or peak roof. Maximum Number of Stories—2 stories, (4-stories if two levels of parking) Maximum Dwelling Units Per Acre—16 units Minimum Front Yard—50% of building height not less than 25 feet Minimum Side Yard—50 % of building height not less than 15 feet, minimum waterfront 25 feet, marina setback is 0.0 feet Minimum Rear Yard—50% of building height not less than 15 feet, minimum waterfront 25 feet, marina setback is 0.0 feet 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 9 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 Maximum Commercial Square Footage (both parcels)—approximately 164,000 square feet, maximum building envelope, including proposed right-of-way vacation as detailed: A building envelope map is included as attachment G. North Parcel = building envelope is ±37,507 square feet. 37,507 sf commercial building 2-stories over a parking level with ±185 off-street spaces. South Parcel = building envelope is ±126,179 square feet. 126,179 sf commercial building 2-stories over a parking level with ±645 off-street spaces. (Note: Maximum commercial area is illustrative only. Several variables can affect the maximum square footage for C-3 uses, including stormwater, drainage, and utilities). Proposed PUD Rezone / Proposed Development Standards: The project site area is 5.42 acres. The applicant has requested to increase density at the project site from 16 DU/A to 31.7 DU/A. The proposed PUD is split into two parcels. The north parcel fronts on the Vanderbilt Lagoon and South Bay Drive. The south parcel fronts Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive. The south parcel includes a pending right-of-way vacation for Gulf Shore Court, the Gulf Shore Court alleyway, and part of Center Street. The One Naples project as proposed, seeks to exceed the current C-3 Zone District standards from Section 4.02.01 of the LDC. MU Tracts 3 and 4 (North Parcel on Vanderbilt Lagoon): The applicant proposes two buildings that appear as a single structure with a length of ±525 feet. The proposed height is zoned at 55 feet and the actual height is 87 feet. The buildings are proposed at 87 feet actual height and are five stories over a parking level. Rooftop pool amenities are proposed. The adjacent building Vanderbilt Palms is two-stories over a parking level. The abutting building Barfoot Pelican is four-stories over a parking level. The setback for both existing buildings, Barefoot Pelican and Vanderbilt Palms, is 25 feet. The proposed MU Tract 3 and 4 buildings are setback 10 feet. The buildings as proposed would be setback 15 feet (closer to the street) than the existing C-3 zoning district would require. MU Tract 2 (South Parcel intersection Southbay-Vanderbilt): The applicant proposes an additional single mid-rise building on Tract 2 with a length of ±260 feet. The proposed height is zoned at 55 feet and the actual height is 77 feet. The building is proposed at 77 feet (not 87 feet) and is five stories over a parking level; 10 feet less than the Tracts 3 and 4 buildings. A rooftop pool amenity is proposed. The adjacent building Sotheby’s Premier Real Estate is one-story over a parking level. The adjacent building Daruma restaurant is a single- story commercial building surrounded by surface parking. The building as proposed would be higher than the C-3 zoning district would allow from Section 4.02.01 of the LDC. The proposed MU Tract 2 building is setback 10 feet from Center Street. The proposed MU Tract 2 building setback along Vanderbilt Beach Road is 15 feet. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 10 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 MU Tract 1 (South Parcel intersection Vanderbilt Beach Road-Gulf Shore Drive): The applicant proposes two residential or hotel tower buildings above a 2-story parking structure at grade. There is a circular entry drive at the building entrance. There is a relocated roadway that connects Southbay to Vanderbilt Beach Road at the east side of the tower buildings. Tower 1 and Tower 2 occupy the area between Southbay, Gulfshore Drive, and Vanderbilt Beach Road. For each tower, the proposed height is zoned at 182 feet and the actual height is 208 feet. The towers are proposed at 14-stories over two-stories of a parking structure. The pool and amenity area are above the 2-story parking structure. The proposed MU Tract 1 building setback along Vanderbilt Beach Road is 15 feet and Gulf Shore Drive and; the building setback is 10 feet along Southbay. The current C-3 district setback along Vanderbilt Beach Road, Southbay and Gulf Shore Drive is 25 feet. The proposed parking structure for the tower 1 and tower 2 buildings fronts along Vanderbilt, Gulf Shore, and South Bay. The proposed parking structure wall is 15 feet from the sidewalk along Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive. The proposed parking structure wall is 10 feet from the sidewalk along South Bay Drive. The height of the proposed parking structure is 35 feet at the setback line. Summary Findings MU Tract 1 (South Parcel intersection Vanderbilt Beach Road-Gulf Shore Drive): As defined by Section 163.3164(9), FS [from the Florida Community Planning Act] “Compatibility” means a condition in which land uses or conditions can coexist in relative proximity to each other in a stable fashion over time such that no use or condition is unduly negatively impacted directly or indirectly by another use or condition. The adjacent and abutting buildings include: North—the Lighthouse Inn hotel, 2-stories, 25-feet height; Turtle Club Condominium Resort 9256 Gulfshore 5-stories, 60 feet height; East—Vanderbilt Palms condominiums, two-stories over ground level parking, 40-feet, Daruma single-story, 25-feet; South—Collier County parking garage 3-stories, 40-feet height; West—Beachmoor Condominium 12-stories, ±125-feet, Phoenician Sands 6-stories, 75-feet; The height of the proposed tower buildings at 208-feet actual height are not directly compatible with the adjacent neighboring buildings. The current allowable maximum height in the C-3 zone district is ±76 feet. The Planning Commission may wish to request the applicant to reduce the height of the proposed MU Tract 1 buildings to the C-3 zoning Section 4.02.01 LDC standards. Residents from the surrounding neighborhoods have requested a reduction of building heights as well. At a reduced height, the buildings may be more compatible in height to the Barefoot Pelican, Vanderbilt Palms, Phoenician condominiums, Beachmoor condominiums, the Turtle Club condominiums and surrounding buildings in the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. The proposed 15-foot setback along Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive for the MU Tract 1 building and the proposed 10-foot setback along Southbay Drive for the MU Tract 1 building are not directly compatible with the 25-foot setback required in the C-3 zone district, 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 11 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 Section 4.02.01 of the LDC. The Planning Commission may wish to request the applicant to increase the setback for MU Tract 1 buildings to 25 feet for all three street frontages: Vanderbilt Beach Road, Gulf Shore Drive, and Southbay. Residents from the surrounding neighborhoods have requested an increase in building setbacks as well. With a 25-foot setback, the proposed building would be more compatible with the C-3 zone district and with the adjacent buildings like the Beach Store, the Beach Box, Sotheby’s and surrounding buildings in the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. Alternatively, the Planning Commission may wish to consider reduced setbacks at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach and Gulf Shore Drive if the applicant chooses to activate the street and proposes pedestrian commercial and retail uses. Importantly, the proposed tower 1 and 2 buildings and parking structure as proposed remove long standing pedestrian commercial uses from the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive. The Beach Box dates to 2014, but prior to that there was Island Drug, Palm Beach Café, Dipper Del Ice Cream, and Will-A-the-Wisp beach clothing and sundries. Additionally, the Beach Store will be removed and not replaced. The Vanderbilt Beach access area is a high pedestrian traffic area and residents and business owners may benefit from street level commercial uses at the prominent intersection. If there were street level commercial spaces, the proposed tower 1 and 2 and the parking structure building may be more compatible with the existing conditions at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive. For illustrative purposes. An example of a design that is more pedestrian oriented for street level commercial uses would be a parking structure building with liner retail buildings similar to that shown in Photo 3. As proposed, there is an additional amount of landscape buffer material at the parking structure wall, which will screen the parking structure wall at the pedestrian level. The parking structure wall will be visible above the tree line and above the hedge row. The street interaction for MU Tract 1 will be very similar to Photo 1 and Photo 2., which shows the heavy landscape buffer at the Collier County parking garage. The tower 1 and 2 scale and massing are not directly compatible with the adjacent buildings. The current allowable maximum height in the C-3 zone district is ±76 feet and buildings in the surrounding Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood are between ±25 feet and ±125 feet. Residents from the surrounding neighborhoods have requested a reduction of the buildings scale and massing. The Planning Commission may wish to request the applicant to consider reducing the massing of the proposed towers to make them more compatible with the existing neighborhood. Alternatively, the Planning Commission may wish to consider increased building height at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach and Gulf Shore Drive if the applicant chooses to utilize step back architecture for the tower 1 and tower 2 buildings designing the buildings to be narrow on the upper floors. For illustrative purposes, one example, of step back or “wedding cake” style architecture is Photo 4. If the proposed tower 1 and tower 2 were more narrow at the upper floors, it may allow more light and air to flow for the neighborhood residents. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 12 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 As stated, the proposed buildings exceed the C-3 height and setback provisions. The Planning Commission may wish to consider requesting the applicant to amend the development standards, so they are compatible with the C-3 zone district provisions of LDC Section 4.02.01 or other development standards that may be appropriate. Summary Findings MU Tracts 3 and 4 (North Parcel on Vanderbilt Lagoon): The height of the proposed buildings at 87 feet is not directly compatible with the neighboring buildings. The proposed height exceeds the C-3 zone district provisions of Section 4.02.01 of the LDC. The Planning Commission may wish to request the applicant to reduce the height of the proposed MU Tract 3 and 4 buildings. Residents from the surrounding neighborhoods have requested a reduction of building heights as well. At a reduced height, the buildings may be more compatible in height to the Barefoot Pelican, Vanderbilt Palms and other surrounding buildings in the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. The proposed 10-foot setback for MU Tract 3 and 4 buildings is not directly compatible with the 25-foot setback for Vanderbilt Palms and the Barefoot Pelican buildings and exceeds the C-3 zone district provisions of Section 4.02.01 of the LDC. The MU Tract 3 and 4 buildings are 15 feet closer to South Bay Drive than other buildings on the street. The Planning Commission may wish to request the applicant to increase the setback for MU Tract 3 and 4 buildings to 25 feet. With a 25 feet setback, the proposed buildings may be more compatible with the adjacent and abutting buildings and other surrounding buildings in the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. The Tract 3 side setback is 10 feet since the perimeter setback is not applicable. The Tract 4 side setback at Barefoot Pelican is ½ the zoned building height. The zoned height is 55 feet which results in a 27.5-foot setback. The actual building height is 87 feet, which results in a 43.5-foot setback. Using the zoned height reduces the east setback and distance between Barefoot Pelican condominiums and the proposed Tract 4 building. The Planning Commission may wish to request the applicant to change the Barefoot Pelican east side setback for Tract 4 to ½ the actual height instead of ½ the zoned height. A larger setback may allow more light and air to flow. The surrounding residents have expressed a desire for more open space for proposed buildings. As stated, the proposed buildings exceed the C-3 height and setback provisions. The Planning Commission may wish to consider requesting the applicant to amend the development standards, so they are compatible with the C-3 zone district provisions of LDC Section 4.02.01 or other development standards that may be appropriate. Summary Findings MU Tract 2 (South Parcel intersection Southbay-Vanderbilt): The height of the proposed building for Tract 2 at 77 feet is not directly compatible with the surrounding buildings. The proposed height exceeds the C-3 zone district provisions of Section 4.02.01 of the LDC. The Planning Commission may wish to request the applicant to reduce the height of the proposed MU Tract 2 building. Residents from the surrounding neighborhoods have requested a reduction of building heights as well. At a reduced height, the buildings may be more compatible in height to the Barefoot Pelican, Vanderbilt Palms and other surrounding buildings in the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 13 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 The proposed 10-foot setback along Center Street for the MU Tract 2 building is not directly compatible with the ±25-foot setback for Sotheby’s, Daruma, and the Barefoot Pelican building. The proposed setback exceeds the C-3 zone district provisions of Section 4.02.01 of the LDC. The MU Tract 2 building is 15 feet closer to Center Street than the existing C-3 zoning district would require. The Planning Commission may wish to request the applicant to increase the setback of the proposed MU Tract 2 building. Residents from the surrounding neighborhoods have requested an increase of building setbacks as well. With a 25-foot setback, the proposed building may be more compatible with the adjacent, and surrounding buildings in the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. The proposed 15-foot setback along Vanderbilt Beach Road for the MU Tract 2 building is not directly compatible with the 25-foot setback for Sotheby’s, the Beach Box buildings, and the larger setback at the Beach Store. The proposed setback exceeds the C-3 zone district provisions of Section 4.02.01 of the LDC. The MU Tract 2 building is 10 feet closer to Vanderbilt Beach Road than the existing C-3 zoning district would require. The Planning Commission may wish to request the applicant to increase the setback of the proposed MU Tract 2 building. Residents from the surrounding neighborhoods have requested an increase of building setbacks as well. With a 25- foot setback, the proposed building may be more compatible with the adjacent, and surrounding buildings in the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. As stated, the proposed buildings exceed the C-3 height and setback provisions. The Planning Commission may wish to consider requesting the applicant to amend the development standards, so they are compatible with the C-3 zone district provisions of LDC Section 4.02.01 or other development standards that may be appropriate. Photo 1—MU Tract 1 Pedestrian 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 14 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 Photo 2—MU Tract 1 Pedestrian Photo 3—Parking structure retail liner building, coffee house 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 15 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 Photo 4—Rendering step back architecture 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 16 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 There are 3 Deviations requested as part of the proposed project. Discussion is covered below. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08”: (Zoning Division staff responses in non-bold). 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Zoning Division staff has reviewed the proposed rezoning request and finds the uses for hotel, commercial, marina, and residential are compatible and suitable. The traffic suitability was reviewed by the Transportation Division in a separate memo. Drainage will be reviewed at the time of SDP. The Public Utilities Division states that the Vanderbilt Beach Center already receives potable water and wastewater services from the CCWSD, and there are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities available to future development as proposed by this petition. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application were reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office and demonstrate unified control. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the petition and analyzed it for consistency with goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP and they find it to be consistent, if the companion amendment application is approved. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on the location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed development project eliminates long standing existing “street level” neighborhood commercial uses like the Beach Store and the Beach Box restaurant. The applicant has not proposed street level replacement uses at or near the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive. Adding street level commercial uses at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive may be more compatible with the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. Additionally, the proposed development standards for MU Tracts 1 through 4 are not directly compatible with the C-3 zone district standards of Section 4.02.01 of the LDC. The proposed PUD Document buffering, and screening 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 17 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 standards have been reviewed the landscape review staff and the deviations for the buffers are acceptable. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. There is no deviation from the required usable open space as submitted. However, the proposed open space for the project area is located mostly on roof top amenity facilities. Compliance with approved open space standards would be demonstrated at the time of SDP. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Compliance with all other applicable concurrency management regulations is required, including but not limited to, plat plans or site development plans. The Public Utilities Division states that the CCWSD has sufficient treatment capacities for water and wastewater services to the project. Conveyance capacity must be confirmed at the time of development permit application. The Transportation Division states that the roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project as noted in the attached Transportation Staff Report memo. Additional operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. All the surrounding area has been developed at some point in the past. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure to accommodate this project, including readily available County water and wastewater mains within the adjacent rights-of-way. Adequate public facility requirements will be addressed when future development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. There are three deviations proposed for the requested PUD, which are detailed in the deviations section of the report. REZONE FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 18 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 the following when applicable.” Zoning Division staff responses are in non-bold: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff has determined the petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP, if the companion small scale amendment is approved. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern related to surrounding properties is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this report. The proposed uses will not change the existing land use patterns in the area. However, the proposed project will intensify the residential land use pattern at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive. A portion of the proposed development is vacant. Additionally, some buildings along Southbay have been razed by the applicant. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is zoned C-3 Commercial Intermediate. The application request is to rezone to MPUD and there are existing PUD projects in the nearby area. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed MPUD boundaries are logical and appropriate in terms of PUD boundaries. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary. As stated in the Zoning Division review, the property could be developed under the C-3 zone district. The property owner does not wish to develop the property utilizing the current C-3 zoning provisions and has requested to rezone the property, as well as amend the Growth Management Plan. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed project is not likely to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The Transportation Division states that the roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project as noted in the attached Staff Report memo. Additional operational 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 19 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. It is not anticipated that the rezone request to MPUD will create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage for this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County environmental staff will evaluate the stormwater management system and design criteria at the time of SDP. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The project proposes construction of some buildings where none exist. The light and air to adjacent areas will be affected. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. Property value is affected by many factors. It is driven by market conditions and is generally a subjective determination. Zoning alone is not likely to adversely affect the property values. Generally, market conditions prevail. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Most of the adjacent property is already developed as commercial or residential uses. The approval of the rezone request from C-3 to MPUD is not likely to deter development activity of surrounding property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed rezone to MPUD complies with the GMP (if companion amendment is approved) and is found consistent, then it is consistent with public policy and the change does not result in the granting of a special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is determined to be consistent with public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning. The applicant has not provided any evidence that the property cannot be used in accordance with C-3 zoning. The applicant has stated that the rezoning is necessary to develop the property. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 20 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. The Zoning Division staff finds that the proposed change exceeds the existing C-3 zone district and Section 4.02.01 LDC standards for maximum for height, setbacks, scale and massing. However, with Staff conditions of approval, it is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The application was reviewed and found compliant with the GMP (if the companion amendment is approved) and the LDC. The Zoning Division staff does not review other sites related to a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The applicant has requested a street right-of-way vacation as part of their project application in a separate petition to the Board of County Commissioners. The vacation and subsequent removal and relocation of the street is a significant site alteration to make the property usable for the proposed project. If the project is approved, the final development standards would be applied during any future SDP application process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project must comply with the criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF) and must be consistent with applicable goals and objectives of the GMP related to adequate public facilities. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. This petition has been reviewed by Comprehensive Planning staff for consistency with the GMP, and they find it to be consistent, if the companion amendment application is approved. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking three deviations from the requirements of the LDC. The petitioner’s rationale and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. Deviation #1 (Architectural Standards) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 21 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 “Deviation #1 requests relief form LDC 5.05.08.D.3.c.i., which requires that “Transitional massing elements can be no more than 100 percent taller than the average height of adjacent buildings, but no more than 30 feet, and no less than ten feet above the existing grade” to instead allow for the parking deck to be a maximum of 35 feet in height.” Petitioner’s Justification: Although the parking deck is +/- 30 feet in height measured from existing grade, consistent with this Code Section, elements required for safety, include railings and/or safety walls, add an additional 5’ of height above existing grade, necessitating the requested deviation. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable; In compliance with LDC section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community” and LDC section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner as demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting pub lic purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation. Deviation #2 (Parking Space Requirements) “Deviation #2 requests relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.G Table 17 Parking Space Requirements which allows small-scale recreation facilities that are accessory to a Multi-family project and intended only for the residents of that project, exclusive of “golf courses/clubhouses”, to be calculated at 50 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are not within 300 feet of the recreation facilities and at 25 percent of the normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are within 300 feet of the recreation facilities, to instead allow “golf courses/clubhouses” to be included in the applicable parking reductions allowed for Multi-family projects.” Petitioner’s Justification: The projects conceptual amenity area is 22,000 square feet (in total). Per LDC Section 4.05.04.G Table 17 Parking Space Requirements, this would require 110 parking spaces. Use of the amenities is limited to residents and their guests. Under the multi-family parking requirements, the LDC requires that all units “shall have 1 [parking space] per unit plus visitor parking computed at 0.5 per efficiency unit, 0.75 per 1-bedroom unit, and 1 per 2-bedroom or larger unit. This calculation requires more than adequate guest parking to serve the project. Given the unique project design, the proximity of the amenity facilities to the units they serve, and the fact that the majority of parking for unit owners and guests is multi-level structured parking, it is obvious residents and their guests will not drive to these facilities and therefore parking beyond that required in the LDC for multi-family development is not necessary. As required by code, there will be limited parking to serve these facilities for pick or drop of individuals or loading/unloading as may be necessary. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable; staff sees no detrimental effect with this deviation. The residents and guests are not likely to drive to the amenity. In compliance with LDC section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community” and LDC section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner as demonstrated that the deviation 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 22 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” The Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation. Deviation #3 (Buffer Type) “Deviation #3 requests relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4., which states that the minimum width of the perimeter landscape buffer shall vary according to the ultimate width of the abutting right-of-way, thus requiring a 10 foot wide Type “D” perimeter buffer adjacent to Gulf Shore Drive and a 15 foot wide Type “D” perimeter buffer adjacent to Vanderbilt Beach Road, to instead allow for the buffer along Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road to terminate 36’ from the Vanderbilt Beach Road / Gulf Shore Drive property corner as depicted on Sheet 2 of the Master Concept Plan. This deviation allows for public placemaking elements to include a water feature, expanded public sidewalk with a public art centerpiece and public seating, and green wall as depicted on Sheet 7 of 7 of Exhibit G. The green wall planting system will be attached to the exterior of the garage structure. This system may consist of a variety of plants that will grow vertically upward on a lattice / trellis like structure or may utilize a living wall system. The green wall will be a minimum of 10 feet in height. The types of plants at installation are anticipated to be Trachelospermum jasminoides (Confederate jasmine) with 7’ tall runners supplemented with Mandevilla with 5’ tall runners, or comparable species depending upon availability. A minimum of 20 of these vines will be planted. The number of Living Wall plants will be determined at time of design and will be suitable for sun and salt exposure. A detailed green wall plan shall be submitted at time of SDP application.” Petitioner’s Justification: This area experiences very high levels of pedestrians and bicycle traffic. The treatment of this corner, providing an enhanced pedestrian level experience, was discussed at the neighborhood information meeting. The treatment of the corner with the “placemaking” elements identified in this deviation and graphically depicted on Exhibit G, sheet 7 of 7, goes well beyond the provision of a 10 or 15-foot-wide perimeter landscape buffer, in terms of public benefit. The area within which the deviation applies is limited to a dimension of 36 feet in either direction from the center point of the corner (see below). We will still provide the required number of trees and overall, the plantings provided in the buffers along Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road exceed LDC planting requirements (See Exhibit “G” Sheets 2 of 7 and 3 of 7 for details). The “placemaking” treatment of this corner will be a significant public benefit and approval of the deviation request is warranted. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Per LDC 4.06.01.A.2, buffers are intended to, among other things, screen and buffer harsher visual aspects of urban development, reduce noise, and enhance community identity. The water feature will help mitigate some of the noise from within the development and, along with the green wall, will provide an opaque screen to visually buffer the parking deck behind it. Staff believes that the placemaking features to be included in this area will help enhance community identity. In compliance with LDC section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 23 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 and welfare of the community” and LDC section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner as demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” Therefore, Zoning Division and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation with the following conditions: 1. Revisions to the Master Concept Plan and Exhibit G, Perimeter Buffers, are required to reflect the compensating right-of-way for the turn lane and its impact on the required landscape buffer. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on March 3, 2020, 5:30 PM, at Saint John the Evangelist Catholic Church, The Ballroom 625 111th Avenue North Naples, FL34108. For further information, please see the NIM Summary information in the back-up material. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2 -1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed this staff report for content and legal sufficiency on September 23, 2020 RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Division staff recommends the CCPC forward a recommendation of approval to the BCC for petition number PL20190000697 One Naples MPUD subject to approval of the GMPA PL20190000696 and Right-of-Way Vacation PL20200000368, and subject to the following development standards and; subject to Conditions 1 through 5: Maximum building height for all Tracts is 76 feet zoned, except that Tract 1 can be increased to ±125 feet zoned height if step back architecture is used for the upper floors of buildings. Minimum Building setbacks for all Tracts is 25 feet, except that minimum building setbacks for Tract 1 can be reduced to 15 feet if street level pedestrian commercial uses are within a building at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulfshore Drive. 1. For the PUD Deviation Section and Site Plan with Deviations process. The language appears to be redundant because the LDC allows it. It appears that the applicant is creating a hybrid process for administrative deviations that apply to new structures by utilizing the DR process, which was created for redevelopment of old commercial areas. The Site Plan with Deviations language should be removed from the PUD document. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MUDZ-PL20190000697; One Naples MPUD Page 24 of 24 Revised: September 24, 2020 2. Developer commitment 2.B.i. shall include a right-turn lane for northbound Gulf Shore Drive. (Commitment 2.B.i can be found at the bottom of page 9 in the proposed PUD ordinance). 3. Update and revise the Master Concept Plan and Exhibit G, Perimeter Buffers, to reflect the compensating right-of-way for the turn lane and its impact on the required landscape buffer. 4. A Type B Buffer is required along the northern waterfront boundary, adjacent to Vanderbilt Lagoon, for areas not developed with buildings or structures. This will be reviewed and required at time of Site Development Plan. 5. If Deviation #3 is used, the placemaking elements are required. Attachments: A) Proposed One Naples MPUD Ordinance B) Proposed Master Plan One Naples C) Density Map Vanderbilt Beach Area D) Unit Count Map Vanderbilt Beach Area E) FLUE Consistency Memo One Naples F) Transportation Staff Memo G) Building Envelope Map C-3 zone H) Back up material 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Final Staff Report One Naples 9-24-2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 1 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx EXHIBIT A ONE NAPLES MPUD LIST OF PERMITTED USES MU TRACTS PERMITTED USES: The PUD may be developed entirely as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered, or used, or land used, in whole or in part, within the One Naples MPUD, for other than the following: I. Principal Uses A. Mixed Uses 1. Multi-family residential units not to exceed 172 total units. In order to ensure the project is mixed use in nature, a minimum of 40 multifamily dwelling units shall be developed. 2. Up to 10,000 square feet of the following uses: a. Retail (SIC 5311-5399; 5411-5499; 5611-5699; 5712-5736; 5912; 5921); b. Restaurant, eating and drinking establishments (5812 and 5813); and c. Personal services (7212, 7231, and 7241). d. Professional Office. 3. Marina, up to the maximum number of slips permitted under the LDC and the Manatee Protection Plan, primarily limited to use by residents and guests, except as follows: a maximum of 4 transient slips may be permitted, which may be leased to charter boat vessels for public use; and, a ship’s store, limited to 1,000 square feet and marine fueling facility may be open to the public accessing the site via the water. Liveaboards and/or overnight use shall not be permitted. B. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Hearing Examiner or the Board of Zoning Appeals, by the process outlined in the LDC. II. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures permitted by right in this MPUD, including, but not limited to: A. Residential Accessory Uses: 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 2 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx 1. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents of the PUD, such as swimming pools, fitness centers, dining facilities, sports courts, and recreation/amenity buildings. 2. Customary accessory uses and structures to residential units, including parking structures, gazebos, fountains, trellises, signage, and similar structures. 3. Temporary sales facilities may be permitted. B. Commercial Accessory Uses: 1. One caretaker’s residences, subject to LDC Section 5.03.05. 2. Temporary display of merchandise during business hours provided it does not adversely affect pedestrian or vehicular traffic or public health or safety as determined by the County. Merchandise storage and display is prohibited within front yards adjacent to public rights of way, unless permitted though a temporary use permit for a special event. 3. Customary accessory uses and structures to commercial development, including parking structures, gazebos, fountains, trellises, and similar structures. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 3 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx EXHIBIT B ONE NAPLES MPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for residential and commercial land uses within One Naples MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. MU Tract 1 MU Tract 2 MU Tract 3 MU Tract 4 PRICIPAL USES MIN. LOT AREA 20,000 s.f. 25,000 s.f 25,000 s.f. 25,000 s.f. MIN. LOT WIDTH1 50’ 50’ 50’ 50’ MIN. FLOOR AREA2 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. PERIMETER SETBACKS GULF SHORE DRIVE 15’ to Parking Deck, 25’ to Tower3 N/A N/A N/A VANDERBILT BEACH RD. 15’ to Parking Deck, 25’ to Tower3 15’ N/A N/A SOUTHBAY DRIVE 10’ to Parking Deck, 25’ to Tower3 10’ 10’ 10’ CENTER STREET 10’ 10’ N/A N/A WATERFRONT N/A N/A 0’ 0’ BAREFOOT PELICAN CONDO. PL N/A N/A N/A ½ ZONED BH ALL INTERNAL DRIVES/ACCESS EASEMENTS 0’ 0’ 0’ 0’ ALL OTHER YARDS 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 50’ N/A 30’ 30’ MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTMAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED (ZONED) 182’ 55’ 55’ 55’ MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED (ACTUAL) 3 208’ 77’ 87’ 87’ ACCESSORY USES SETBACKS: ADJACENT TO PUBLIC STREET S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. SETBACKS: ALL OTHER YARDS S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED (ZONED) 40’ 30’ 30’ 30’ MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED (ACTUAL) 45’ 40’ 40’ 40’ s.f. = square feet S.P.S. = Same as Principal Structures PL = Property Line 1 As measured by frontage on a public right-of-way or internal driveway. 2 For residential dwelling units. Commercial uses are not subject to a minimum floor area requirement. 3 The term Parking Deck refers to the multi-story parking structure located under the two Tower elements, located on Tract MU as depicted on Exhibit G. The Parking Deck shall not exceed 35’ in Actual Height. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 4 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 320Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 5 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 321Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 6 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 322Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 7 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx EXHIBIT D ONE NAPLES MPUD - LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 11 THROUGH 32, BLOCK “A” VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND A PORTION OF VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK “D”, OF SAID VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER SUBDIVISION AND A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GULF SHORE DRIVE (70 FEET WIDE PER SAID PLAT) AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTHBAY DRIVE (PER RESOLUTION 94-61) (COMMERCE STREET PER SAID PLAT) (60 FEET WIDE PER SAID PLAT); THENCE S.89°52'30"E. ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIG HT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 552.44 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK "B" OF SAID PLAT; THENCE S.00°07'30"W. ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10 A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, BLOCK "B"; THENCE N.89°52'30"W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS 7 THROUGH 10, BLOCK "B" OF SAID PLAT A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE S.00°07'30"W. A DISTANCE OF 143.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 4, BLOCK "C" OF SAID PLAT AND A P OINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CENTER STREET (60.00 FEET WIDE PER SAID PLAT); THENCE S.84°40'40"E. ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 18, BLOCK "C" OF SAID PLAT AND SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 358.37 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 18, BLOCK "C" OF SAID PLAT AND THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CENTER STREET AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID SOUTHBAY DRIVE (60.00 FOOT WIDE COMMERCE STREET PER SAID PLAT); THENCE S.06°04'30"E. ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 18, BLOCK "C", AND SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 125.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 18, BLOCK "C" AND A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD (100.00 FOOT WIDE PER SAID PLAT) THENCE N.80°29'30"W. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 792.84 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 8, BLOCK "D" OF SAID PLAT AND THE INTERSECTION OF SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GULFSHORE DRIVE (70.00 FOOT WIDE PER SAID PLAT); THENCE N.08°23'20"W. ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 274.80 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 5.42 ACRES MORE OR LESS 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 8 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx EXHIBIT E ONE NAPLES MPUD LIST OF DEVIATIONS FROM LDC In addition to the specific deviations listed below, additional deviations may be requested from any otherwise applicable architectural, landscape, dimensional, or design standards set forth in the LDC, excluding building height. Any such request for deviation shall utilize process and procedures set forth in LDC Section 10.02.03.F, Site plan with deviations for redevelopment projects, but shall not be subject to the limitations set forth therein. Architectural Standards: 1. Deviation from LDC 5.05.08.D.3.c.i., which requires that “Transitional massing elements can be no more than 100 percent taller than the average height of adjacent buildings, but no more than 30 feet, and no less than ten feet above the existing grade” to instead allow for the parking deck to be a maximum of 35 feet in height. Other: 2. Deviation from LDC Section 4.05.04.G Table 17 Parking Space Requirements which allows small-scale recreation facilities that are accessory to a Multi -family project and intended only for the residents of that project, exclusive of “golf courses/clubhouse s”, to be calculated at 50 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are not within 300 feet of the recreation facilities and at 25 percent of the normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are within 300 fee t of the recreation facilities to instead allow golf courses/clubhouses to be included in the applicable parking reductions allowed for Multi-family projects. 3. Deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4., which states that the minimum width of the perimeter landscape buffer shall vary according to the ultimate width of the abutting right- of-way, thus requiring a 10 foot wide Type “D” perimeter buffer adjacent to Gulf Shore Dr. and a 15 foot wide Type “D” perimeter buffer adjacent to Vanderbilt Beach Rd., to instead allow for the buffer along Gulf Shore Dr. and Vanderbilt Beach Rd. to terminate 36’ from the Vanderbilt Beach Rd. / Gulf Shore Dr. property corner as depicted on Sheet 2 of the Master Concept Plan. This deviation allows for public placemaking elements to include a water feature, expanded public sidewalk with a public art centerpiece and public seating, and green wall as depicted on Sheet 7 of 7 of Exhibit G. The green wall planting system will be attached to the exterior of the garage structure. This system may consist of a variety of plants that will grow vertically upward on a lattice / trellis like structure or may utilize a living wall system. The green wall will be a minimum of 10 feet in height. The types of plants at installation are anticipated to be Trachelospermum jasminoides (Confederate jasmine) with 7’ tall runners supplemented with Mandevilla with 5’ tall runners, or comparable species depending upon availability. A minimum of 20 of these vines will be planted. The Living Wall plants will be determined at time of design and will be suitable for sun and salt exposure. A detailed green wall plan shall be submitted at time of SDP application. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 9 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx EXHIBIT F ONE NAPLES MPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 1. PUD COMMITMENTS A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the MPUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Vanderbilt Naples Holdings, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document, to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to the County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the MPUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity will not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the MPUD is closed out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. TRANSPORTATION A. The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 148 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. B. Subject to approval of a right-of-way permit if within the public right-of-way, the Developer shall provide the following, at no cost to Collier County, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for a residential dwelling unit: i. Design and installation of a traffic signal at Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive, subject to design approval by Collier County Transportation; 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 10 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx ii. Design and installation of an extended left turn into Collier County parking garages, subject to design approval by Collier County Transportation; iii. Design and installation of enhanced technology for Collier County parking garage including signage upgrades for notification to public of garage parking availability, subject to design approval by Collier County Transportation and Parks and Recreation; iv. Design and installation of improvements to South Bay Drive, including removal of roadside swales and installation of a closed drainage system, 10’ travel lanes, 4’ bike lanes, 5’ sidewalks on both sides of the road, subject to design approval by Collier County Transportation; v. Design and installation of a sidewalk along east side of Gulf Shore Drive adjacent to project, subject to design approval by Collier County Transportation; vi. Design and installation of an 8’ wide multi-use pathway along the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, from the terminus of existing pathway to Gulf Shore Drive subject to design approval by Collier County Transportation; and vii. Design, install, and maintain enhanced landscaping (above and beyond required perimeter buffers) as depicted on Exhibit G, viii. Design, install, and maintain enhanced landscaping within the adjacent rights- of-way, in accordance with the County approved Landscape Maintenance Agreement. C. No vertical construction within MU Tract 1 will be allowed until the permanent replacement easements required by the Petition to Vacate, PL20200000368, are approved by staff and recorded in the official land records of Collier County. D. The Developer will replace the vacated Gulf Shore Court with a privately maintained access drive that will be open to the general public in the area depicted on the page 2 of the Master Concept Plan. The access drive shall include a sidewalk on the western edge and shall include a replacement County utility easement to the Collier County Water- Sewer District in the area shown on the access drive depicted on page 2 of the Master Concept Plan. 3. PUBLIC UTILITIES A. Wastewater generated by the proposed development shall be routed to gravity sewer on Vanderbilt Beach Road, southeast of the project. B. No vertical construction within MU Tract 1 will be allowed until the permanent replacement easements required by the Petition to Vacate, PL20200000368, are approved by staff and recorded in the official land records of Collier County. The Developer shall ensure that there is no lapse in County potable water service and wastewater service to existing customers in the event that potable water and wastewater infrastructure is required to be relocated or upgraded during construction. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 11 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx 4. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT A. The Developer shall provide the following, at no cost to Collier County: i. Twenty-four (24) Medical and Standard Cots and one hundred fifty (150) Standard cots are to be shipped FOB to Collier County Emergency Management at the time of the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Collier County Emergency Management will provide specifications, a roster of vendors and the shipping address upon request of the developer prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. ii. One (1) 16 ft. dual axel trailer enclosed utility trailer shall be shipped FOB Naples prior to the issuance of first certificate of occupancy with instructions to convey title or certificate of origin to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 12 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 328Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 13 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 329Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 14 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 330Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 15 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 331Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 16 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 332Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 17 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 333Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 18 of 18 C:\Users\nancybradley\Desktop\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 10-07-2020.docx 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 334Attachment: Attachment A Ordinance 10.07.2020 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 5 of 18 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\7-31-2020\One Naples MPUD Document (PL-20190000697) 7-31-2020.docx 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Attachment B Master Plan (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) RMF-6 RMF-16 CPUDVANDERBILT BEACHCOMMERCIAL TOURIST RSF-3 RT-VBRTO RSF-3 /ST RMF-6 RSF-3 /ST C-3 PUDMIRALIADensity: 23 PUDPELICAN BAYDensity: 3.7 Vanderbilt DRGulf Shore DRVanderbilt Beach RD Document Path: G:\GIS-Team\GIS_Requests\2020\07-Jul\GSD-8953_OneNaples-DensityMap(JSabo)\Request25.mxd GROSS DENSITY UNITS PER ACRE (UPA)FOR PROPERTIES SURROUNDING PROPOSEDONE NAPLES MPUD(PL-19-697) [WITHIN 1/4 MILE] One Na ples MPUD(Pro posed) 1/4 mi. Buffe r Map Date: 9/18/2020 Growth Management DepartmentOperations & RegulatoryManagement Division I 0 250 500125 Feet Proposed MPUDOne Naples Disclaimer: Density values are approximate,as provided by PUD Monitoring. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Attachment C Density Map PUD OneNaples (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Vanderbilt DRVanderbilt Beach RDGulf Shore DRThe BeachmoorUnits: 33 Phoenican SandsUnits: 10 The VanderbiltUnits: 19 Vanderbilt Beach &Harbour Club (West)Units: 26 Vanderbilt Beach &Harbour Club (East)Units: 18 SeawatchUnits: 26 Admiralty ofVanderbilt BeachUnits: 12 TheWatermarkUnits: 22 Gulf PointeUnits: 15 Sausalitoof NaplesUnits: 7 FloridianClub (West )Units: N/A Floridian Club (East)Units: N/A Vanderbilt Beach MotelUnits: N/A Lighthouse InnUnits: N/A Vanderbilt BeachMotel CondoUnits: 16 Regatta atVanderbilt Beach IUnits: 92 Regatta atVanderbilt Beach IIUnits: 61 VanderbiltPalmsUnits: 28 BarefootPelicanUnits: 60 VanderbiltHideawayUnits: 15 Regatta atVanderbilt Beach IIIUnits: 79 Document Path: G:\GIS-Team\GIS_Requests\2020\09-Sep\GSD-10142_HighRiseUnits(JSabo)\Request.mxd UNIT COUNTS FOR BUILDINGS ADJACENT TOPROPOSED ONE NAPLES MPUD(PL-19-697)One Na ples MPUD(Pro posed) Map Date: 9/18/2020 Growth Management DepartmentOperations & RegulatoryManagement Division I 0 280140 Feet Proposed MPUDOne Naples Disclaimer: Unit counts are based on numberof Units Addressed in each structure 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Attachment D Unit Counts OneNaples (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) ‒ 1 ‒ PL20190000697, One Naples ::: PUDZ Consistency Review Growth Management Department Zoning Division CO N S I S T E N C Y RE V I E W M E M O RA N D U M To: James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section From: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: revised to July 10, 2020 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review of Proposed Planned Unit Development Rezone PETITION NUMBER: PL20190000697 [REV: 4] PETITION NAME: One Naples Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezone REQUEST: The request has substantively changed from its previous proposal, now with lesser residential density and lower commercial intensity. The current proposal is to rezone property from the C-3, Commercial Intermediate zoning district to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to allow development of up to 172 multi-family residential or hotel units, a private 99 wet-slip marina and ships store, and, up to 10,000 sq. ft. of commercial space. A companion petition [PL20190000696/CPSS-2019-10] currently seeks to establish a new mixed- use Subdistrict in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and map series for the subject property. LOCATION: The two-part subject site, consisting of ±5.42 acres, comprises a portion of the block located immediately north of the County’s Vanderbilt Beach Parking Garage, generally bounded on the south by Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862), Gulf Shore Drive on the west, and by South Bay Drive on the north and east, in Section 32, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. This part of the site also comprises all of Gulf Shore Court, an unnamed alley, and a westerly segment of Center Street. The second part of the subject site comprises a portion of mid-block waterfront lots located on Vanderbilt Lagoon. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The FLUE’s Urban Mixed Use District permits water-dependent and water-related land uses within the coastal region of this District. Mixed-use sites of water-dependent and water-related uses and other recreational uses may include water-related parks, marinas (public or private), yacht clubs, and related accessory and recreational uses, such as boat storage, launching facilities, fueling facilities, and restaurants. Any development that includes a water-dependent and/or water-related land use shall be encouraged to use the Planned Unit Development technique and 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Attachment E Consistency Review Comp Plan (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) ‒ 2 ‒ PL20190000697, One Naples ::: PUDZ Consistency Review other innovative approaches to conserve environmentally sensitive areas and to assure compatibility with surrounding land uses. The County’s Land Development Code allows for marinas as permitted uses in the Commercial (C-3) and Commercial (C-4) Districts. The County’s Manatee Protection Plan (NR-SP-93-01) May 1995 restricts the location of marinas and may limit the number of wet slips, the construction of dry storage facilities, and boat ramps, based upon the Plan’s marina siting criteria. The One Naples MPUD rezone property is contingent, in part, upon approval of the companion Growth Management Plan amendment (GMPA) petition PL20190000696/CPSS-2019-10. That GMPA will establish the Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict. The Future Land Use Element (FLUE) states the following: “The Urban Mixed Use District is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including mixed-use developments such as Planned Unit Developments.” CCME Policy 12.2.5 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) defines the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). “The County shall consider the CHHA as a geographical area lying below the elevation of the Category 1 storm surge line as presently defined in the 20 11 Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council’s Hurricane Evacuation Study, or subsequently authorized storm surge or evacuation planning studies coordinated by the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services and approved by the Board of County Commissioners.” The CHHA Overlay in the FLUE states, in part, “The CHHA boundary is generally depicted on the Future Land Use Map and is more precisely shown in the Future Land Use Map series; all lands lying seaward of that boundary are within the CHHA. The Capital Improvement Element and Conservation and Coastal Management Element both contain policies pertaining to the expenditure of public funds for public facilities within the CHHA.” FLUE Policy 5.3 states, “All rezonings must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan.“ This request for the rezone to the MPUD zoning district cannot be consistent with the GMP until such time as the small-scale GMPA is approved and in effect. FLUE Policy 5.6 requires new developments to be compatible with the surrounding land area. To be consistent with this policy, the companion MPUD must demonstrate compatibility with the surrounding land area. The County recognizes Smart Growth policies and practices in its consideration of future land use arrangements and choice-making options. FLUE Objective 7 and Policies 7.1 through 7.4 promote Smart Growth policies for new development and redevelopment projects pertaining to access, interconnections, open space, and walkable communities. Objective 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Attachment E Consistency Review Comp Plan (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) ‒ 3 ‒ PL20190000697, One Naples ::: PUDZ Consistency Review The One Naples Master Concept Plan Exhibit C-1, dated to 3/26/20, shows consistency with this policy as it depicts the subject property fronts Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR862) classified as a major arterial road, Gulf Shore Drive, and South Bay Drive. The One Naples ROW Landscape Exhibit G, dated to 3/27/20, depicts the main tract with its primary connection to Vanderbilt Beach Road, and secondary connection to South Bay Drive. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The accesses to Vanderbilt Beach Road and South Bay Drive described above are supplemented by access via Center Street. It’s noted the project site is too constrained to provide internal accesses or loop roads. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The Concept Plan depicts existing roadways that maintain their connection to other local roads. It also depicts portions of other streets and alleys that are to be vacated as part of the project. The subject property comprises a length of Center Street, which is an unclassified urban street. The site abuts streets on most sides and developed residential and commercial uses on the remaining sides. There appears to be no opportunity for interconnecting to those developed parcels. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The One Naples ROW, Mobility and Landscape Enhancement Plan, Sidewalk Exhibit G, dated to 1/14/2020, shows compliance with this policy with sidewalks along the entire perimeter on the near side of by Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862), Gulf Shore Drive on the west, and by South Bay Drive. New sidewalks are depicted on the far side of South Bay Drive, and on the south side of Center Street, in front of new multi-family buildings there. Walkways internal to the site are also depicted. The proposed development site is constrained to 5.42 acres and proposes multi-family residential units at a density of 31.7 DU/A, along with a mix of non-residential uses and a marina. The Concept Plan depicts pools, fountains, a marina, with pier-side and pool-side seating areas as common open space. The proposed community amenities and recreational uses may function as civic facilities when used as for such things a polling place neighborhood meeting areas and group activities. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Attachment E Consistency Review Comp Plan (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) ‒ 4 ‒ PL20190000697, One Naples ::: PUDZ Consistency Review CLOSING REMARKS: Due to the request for increased density from the maximum allowed density of 16 DU/A to 31.7 DU/A, the petition is not consistent with the adopted GMP and therefore the petitioner submitted the companion GMPA PL20190000696/CPSS-2019-10. The MPUD petition may be deemed consistent if and when the the companion GMP amendment petition PL20190000696/CPSS-2019-10 is adopted and goes into effect. The PUD Ordinance needs to provide for the effective date consistent with the effective date of the companion GMP amendment petition. cc: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager, Zoning Services Section Anita Jenkins, AICP, Interim Planning & Zoning Director, Zoning Division G: Comp\Consistency Reviews\2020 \\bcc.colliergov.net\data\GMD-LDS\CDES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews\2020\PUDZ\PUDZ-PL2019-697 One N_R4 ajFNL.docx 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Attachment E Consistency Review Comp Plan (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) . ‒ 1 ‒ PETITION: PL2019-0697, PUDZ ONE NAPLES August 28, 2020 STAFF MEMO: Petition ONE NAPLES COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, Transportation Planning Section HEARING DATE: CCPC October 1, 2020, BCC December 8, 2020 SUBJECT: PETITION: PL2019-0697, PUDZ Growth Management Plan (GMP) Consistency Findings, Transportation Element. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER FOR THE PETITION: JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. 4711 7th Avenue Southwest Naples, Florida 34119 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property comprises approximately +/-5.42 acres and is located at the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive, in Section 32, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, in Collier County, Florida. Aerial 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Attachment F Transportation STAFF MEMO One Naples 8-28-20 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) . ‒ 2 ‒ PETITION: PL2019-0697, PUDZ ONE NAPLES August 28, 2020 REQUESTED ACTION: This request is seeking a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (PUDZ) rezone approval. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The proposed development is approximately +/- 5.42 acres in size and located at the northeast corner of the Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive intersection in Collier County, Florida. The request according to the proposed PUD is to allow the development of approximately 172 multi-family or hotel units, approximately 10,000 square feet of commercial uses on the subject parcel. STAFF ANALYSIS: GMP TRANSPORTATION ELEMENTS AND STAFF FINDINGS Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicants Traffic Impact Statemen, dated May 24, 2020 by electronic signature, for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the applicable 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” Staff finding: According to the PUDZ document provided with the proposed rezoning the applicant is requesting a maximum of approximately 172 multi-family or hotel units, approximately 10,000 square feet of commercial uses on the subject parcel. Additionally, the PUD and TIS indicate that there will be approximately 1,000 square feet of marina ship store, accessed via the water, that also includes boat docks primarily for residents and guests except for 4 transient slips. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Attachment F Transportation STAFF MEMO One Naples 8-28-20 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) . ‒ 3 ‒ PETITION: PL2019-0697, PUDZ ONE NAPLES August 28, 2020 According to the Transportation Impact Statement (TIS) provided with this rezone petition the proposed mixed-use development will generate an additional projected total of +/-148 PM peak hour two-way trips on the following adjacent roadway segment with the listed capacities according to the current 2019 AUIR. Specifically; Vanderbilt Beach Road from Gulf Shore Drive to Tamiami Trail North (US 41) has a current service volume of 1,400 trips and a remaining capacity of 462 trips and is currently operating at LOS “C”. Gulf Shore Drive from Vanderbilt Beach Road to 111th Avenue has a current service volume of 800 trips and a remaining capacity of 500 trips and is currently operating at LOS B. It is noted that this segment of Vanderbilt Beach Road is “constrained by policy”, this means that the roadway cannot be expanded without authorization action by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC). Based on the 2019 AUIR, the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed new trips for this development within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, the subject Rezone can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Policy 7.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “Collier County shall apply the standards and criteria of the Access Management Policy as adopted by Resolution and as may be amended to ensure the protection of the arterial and collector system’s capacity and integrity.” Staff finding: The development is proposing two main access points for this development. One on Vanderbilt Beach Road opposite the existing access to the beach access parking structure, and one on Southbay Drive. There are also several secondary access points that are needed according to the applicant for internal operational access. Due to the known operational challenges at this location which are not related to the roadway capacity staff requested that the applicant provide an operational analysis with this request (see Appendix B Vanderbilt Beach Road Operational Analysis, dated May 22, 2020). This analysis was based on in-season traffic counts taken before the coronavirus shut-down. The results of this study are the following developer commitments: • Design and installation of a traffic signal at Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive, subject to design approval by Collier County Transportation; • Design and installation of an extended left turn into Collier County parking garages, subject to design approval by Collier County Transportation; • Design and installation of enhanced technology for Collier County parking garage including signage upgrades for notification to public of garage parking availability, subject to design approval by Collier County Transportation and Parks and Recreation; • Design and installation of improvements to South Bay Drive, including removal of roadside swales and installation of a closed drainage system, 10’ travel lanes, 4’ bike lanes, 5’ sidewalks on both sides of the road, subject to design approval by Collier County Transportation; • Design and installation of a sidewalk along east side of Gulf Shore Drive adjacent to the project, subject to design approval by Collier County Transportation; • Design and installation of an 8’ wide multi-use pathway along the north side of 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Attachment F Transportation STAFF MEMO One Naples 8-28-20 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) . ‒ 4 ‒ PETITION: PL2019-0697, PUDZ ONE NAPLES August 28, 2020 Vanderbilt Beach Road, from the terminus of existing pathway to Gulf Shore Drive subject to design approval by Collier County Transportation; • Design, install, and maintain enhanced landscaping (above and beyond required perimeter buffers) as depicted on Exhibit G, • Design, install, and maintain enhanced landscaping within the adjacent rights-of- way, in accordance with the County approved Landscape Maintenance Agreement. Additionally, the developer will replace the vacated Gulf Shore Court with a privately maintained access drive that will be open to the general public in the area depicted on the page 2 of the Master Concept Plan. The access drive shall include a sidewalk on the western edge and shall include a replacement County utility easement to the Collier County Water-Sewer District in the area shown on the access drive depicted on page 2 of the Master Concept Plan. Policy 7.3 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “The County shall implement, through its Land Development Code and Code of Laws and Ordinances, the provision of safe and convenient onsite traffic flow and need for adequate parking for both motorized and non-motorized vehicles as a primary objective in the review of Planned Unit Developments, Site Development Plan, and other appropriate stages of review in the land development application review process. Coordination shall occur with County Engineering staff where traffic circulation is outside the limits of the public ROW.” Staff finding: The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project as noted above. Additional operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of neighboring developments and shall also develop standards and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets.” Staff finding: The proposed developments master plan shows that the development connects to the existing adjacent roadway network. As noted above there will be an access drive through the development between the two main access points which will be open to the public and privately maintained and integrates-connects into the existing network. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed development can be found consistent with this policy. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Attachment F Transportation STAFF MEMO One Naples 8-28-20 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) . ‒ 5 ‒ PETITION: PL2019-0697, PUDZ ONE NAPLES August 28, 2020 Policy 9.5 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, “The County shall encourage projects which provide local resident, pedestrian, bicyclist and motorist movement between and among developments on neighborhood streets in a deliberate balance with its efforts to route cut-through traffic away from neighborhoods and to the arterials and collectors designated in the Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan.” Staff finding: As noted above in Policy 9.3 the proposed master plan indicates interconnects between the proposed development and the adjacent road network to the developed residential projects to the north and east. There are also developer commitments noted above that enhance pedestrian, bicyclist and motorist movements within the road network. Therefore, the proposed development is found consistent with this policy. As noted, the proposed development is projected to generate an additional total of +/- 148 PM peak hour two-way trips on the following adjacent roadway segments with the listed capacities according to the current 2019 AUIR. Existing Roadway Conditions: Roadway Link 2019 AUIR Existing LOS Current Peak Hour Peak Direction Service Volume/Peak Direction 2019 AUIR Remaining Capacity Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulf Shore Drive to Tamiami Trail North (US 41) C 1,400/East 462 Gulf Shore Drive Vanderbilt Beach Road to 111th Avenue B 800/North 500 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Transportation staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP with the proposed Transportation Planning Staff condition of approval and therefore recommends approval of the One Naples PUDZ PL20190000697, and further recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward the petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval with the following condition of approval: Transportation Planning condition of approval: Developer commitment 2.B.i. shall include a right-turn lane for northbound Gulf Shore Drive. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Attachment F Transportation STAFF MEMO One Naples 8-28-20 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) RMF-6 RMF-16 CPUDVANDERBILT BEACHCOMMERCIAL TOURIST RSF-3RSF-3 RT-VBRTO RSF-3/ST C-3 PUDMIRALIA PUDPELICANBAY Vanderbilt Beach RDGulf Shore DRBuilding Envelope= 126179 sq.ft.(Approx.) Building Envelope =37507 sq.ft. (Approx.) Document Path: G:\GIS-Team\GIS_Requests\2020\08-Aug\GSD-9633_OneNaples-EnvelopeMap(JSabo)\Request.mxd Proje ct Boun dary 15' Setback 25' Setback Map Date: 9/21/2020 Growth Management Departm entOperations & RegulatoryManagement Division I 0 100 20050 Feet APPROXIMATE BUILDING ENVELOPE FOR PROPERTIESCOMPRISING PROPOSED ONE NAPLES MPUD(PL-19-697)UTILIZING THE CURRENT C-3 ZONING Disclaimer: The information provided is to be used for illustrativemapping purposes only. Ground sur veying and records search mustbe used to determine absolute boundaries/areas. 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Attachment G Building Envelope C-3 zone (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SmithCamden From:BellowsRay Sent:Tuesday, January 21, 2020 10:22 AM To:SaboJames Cc:SmithCamden Subject:FW: Stock Development's OneNaples Living Attachments:VBR Before & After OneNaples.pdf; ATT00001.htm; One Naples Living.jpeg; ATT00002.htm FYI Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 10:13 AM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Stock Development's OneNaples Living Not sure who has been assigned this project, but here is an email regarding the OneNaples project. Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: richroni gallagher <randrgall@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2020 9:38 AM To: HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; KarlFry <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov>; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; ChrzanowskiStan <Stan.Chrzanowski@colliercountyfl.gov>; SchmittJoseph <Joseph.Schmitt@colliercountyfl.gov>; eastmath@collierschools.com Cc: SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Stock Development's OneNaples Living 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: January 2020 =Public Opposition One Naples Email to Mark Strain - Attachment Before-After (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One 2 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner: I am writing to you with regard to Stock Development’s proposed One Naples Living complex. I have some serious concerns with their present submission to the County and wish to share those with you. Firstly, I recognize Stock has every right to develop the super‐parcel they have assembled in compliance with all existing zoning regulations and don’t begrudge them that. However: Given the recent process with the proposed parking garage at Clam Pass, it’s clear the County recognizes Vanderbilt Beach is overly congested. In season, it’s tough to find a small patch of available sand on the beach. Hence, any variance that permits Stock to add a single residential unit beyond what they can build as of right would make a bad situation worse. Everyone recognizes the traffic congestion at and near the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive is problematic. Vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians all struggle to safely navigate the area. Hence, any variance that allows Stock to add a single additional car beyond what they can build as of right would make a precarious situation even more unsafe. While the proposed height of the towers are not a sharp departure from other existing developments in the immediate area including the Ritz Carlton and Pelican Bay, the setback proposed by Stock palls in comparison to those. The roughly 200’ high tower rising a mere 10’ from the public sidewalk will be oppressive and pose a condition more in line with the concrete jungles of Manhattan than lovely, bucolic Naples. Hence, any variance that enables Stock to construct a single additional floor above what they can build as of right would be a disservice to its neighbors. [Please refer to the attached renderings‐ including a “before and after” massing model and one rendering.] Turkey Bay like so many of our estuaries and waterways constitute a precious and delicate natural resource. Any variance that facilitates Stock building a marina with a single boat in excess of what they can build as of right increases the environmental footprint and jeopardizes a natural treasure. For the above reasons, I believe granting any variances, exemptions or other incentives to Stock Development would be an affront to the residents of Collier County. Thank you very much for your consideration and look forward to the dialogue that the public hearings will afford us. Richard Gallagher 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: January 2020 =Public Opposition One Naples Email to Mark Strain - Attachment Before-After (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: January 2020 =Public Opposition One Naples Email to Mark Strain - Attachment Before-After (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: January 2020 =Public Opposition One Naples Email to Mark Strain - Attachment Before-After (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ 1 LynchDiane From:epircio@verizon.net Sent:Sunday, February 16, 2020 12:42 PM To:johnbamberger@gmail.com; mcbc71@verizon.net; aldelligatti@yahoo.com; FialaDonna; davidgalloway239@gmail.com; suegraves132@hotmail.com; kathyhh42@gmail.com; zman1994 @gmail.com; jcleveland@e-wasteonline.com; jeremiahl@sandcastlecm.com; ckasper@hullinc.com; Zimmerohio1@aol.com; pkmarbach@icloud.com; bamaher55@gmail.com; michael.bosi@colliercountyfl.gov; SawyerMichael; npaa4u@gmail.com; ritalnappi@gmail.com; patwoolley@dsbcglobal.net; rdpritt@aol.com; kathyrobbins@yahoo.com; krosenb@hotmail.com; SaboJames; SaundersBurt; SchmidtCorby; Tabletop248@gmail.com; nsebora@charter.net; jennifer@lifestylespecialist.net; mstra5050@gmail.com; TaylorPenny; Ctheard65@aol.com; thebresnahans@gmail.com; kensredbarn@aol.com; TWard@brouse.com; vanderbiltbeach54 @yahoo.com; wdamman@autosteel.com; scott@swhitecpa.com; Kay.pat.Woolley@gmail.com Subject:Fwd: Meeting Invitation and Update EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please read to gain knowledge Please register to form a coalition Please donate to fund professionals to help us protect our Vanderbilt Beach neighborhoods information about our plans and progress No images? Click here To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. OUR MISSION Our mission is to protect the residents of the Vanderbilt Beach and Naples Park neighborhoods from unreasonable development and, in a more general sense, to protect all of Collier County’s residents who are users of Vanderbilt Beach, itself, by promoting continued and improving access. IN THIS EMAIL… 1. Update on registrations and fundraising 2. Invitation to Informational meetings 3. Details of meetings with County staff 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 4. A couple of requests 5. A final, very important note 1. WHAT A WEEK IT HAS BEEN! Our base of registrants has swelled beyond 350 as of this writing. Donations exceed $11,500. We look forward to the day that we can announce a "membership" in excess of 500. You can help. Tell your friends and neighbors about www.savevanderbiltbeach.com. Today’s article in the Naples Daily News has had an immediate positive impact on registrations. See it here. Naples News Article Stock’s statements and arguments in the piece were typical of what has been said before. Much of it distorts the reality of the company's filings with the County. Some if it is simply flawed. Please review our thoughts about the arguments here. Stock's Flawed Arguments It was interesting to learn, in the article, that the probable meeting date of the Planning Board is in June, and that of the County Commissioners in September. Once again, Stock plans for a time when many of us are not typically here. That puts an increased burden on our year-round residents to plan to attend those events. 2. MEETING INVITATION We will be holding two informational meetings at The Naples Park Association Building located at 654 104th Ave. February 26th at 7:30pm And 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 3 February 27th at 7:30pm (The content of each meeting will be the same. Come only one of the two nights.) This will be your first chance to share with us your hopes and desires for the development, to learn more about the process Stock must go through, and to hear about our ideas and strategies to bring the project more in line with the interests of the neighborhood. Please make an effort to attend on one of the nights. We will have yard signs available especially for those who live on generally busier streets. SPECIAL INCENTIVE: The first 75 people to attend each evening will get a free Save Vanderbilt Beach tee shirt. (Additional shirts will be available at a cost of $5.00.) To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Wearing these shirts will introduce others to the cause. Wearing them to public meetings of the Planning Board and the County Commissioners, and MOST IMMEDIATELY, at the Stock's required Neighborhood Information Meeting (March 3 at Hodges University at I-75 and Immokalee at 5:30pm) is a dramatic and impactful way to show just how many of us are concerned with the proposed project. 3. MEETINGS WITH COUNTY STAFF Over the last several weeks, a small group of us have met with County staff who are working on the Stock application. Present at the meetings were Jim Sabo, jamessabo@colliergov.net, who is the lead planner on this project, Corby Schmidt, CorbySchmidt@colliergov.net, who takes responsibility for the Comprehensive Plan portion of the application, and Mike Sawyer, michaelsawyer@colliergov.net, in the transportation section. In the meetings, we were able to present our general concerns about the project and to ask specific questions about the Stock filings and the County responses. You can access these documents here. 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4 Stock Filings, County Responses Each of the staff members stressed that it is still early in the process, and that there will be many gives and takes between Stock and the County. Our assessment is that while that may be so, our purpose is best served by insisting that Stock must develop to existing zoning codes and regulations. More about these meetings on February 26th and 27th. Note that there has been one minor success. Deviation 7, which Stock requested to allow him to have a sidewalk on only one side of Southbay Drive, has been withdrawn. He has amended his design to have sidewalks on both sides. Hopefully there will be many more, and more important, victories. 4. A Couple of Requests We are making good progress reaching residents in Vanderbilt Beach, Naples Park, and Pelican Bay. Our activity on www.nextdoor.com has been effective in these neighborhoods, but as NextDoor only allows access to residents within each specific community, we cannot access communities other than our own. As you will learn more about at our informational meetings on the 26th and 27th, those communities that lie to the east, especially along Vanderbilt Beach Road, are of special importance to us in achieving the County Commissioners' vote that will be required to achieve our goals. If you know people living in any one of the following neighborhoods, please encourage them to register with us, to go on to the nextdoor.com site serving their neighborhoods, and to share our message. The communities are: Longshore Lakes, Quail Creek, Quail West, Vineyards, Olde Cypress, Esplanade, Quarry, Heritage Bay and Naples National Golf Club (in East Naples). Our experience shows us that social media is vital to getting our word out. Unfortunately, it is an area in which we have very limited experience. If you, or someone you know, does have that experience, and who would like to give us a hand, please have them contact us at info@savevanderbiltbeach.com. Thanks for your help! 5. The Importance of Donating 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 5 It is critical to our success that we have a strong representation of those who have registered as donors as well. Nothing says “commitment” more than backing up words with actions. As I have stated before, although “more is better,” the important thing is that we can show that the vast majority of those registered have donated. The amount does not matter, $10, $20, $50. What matters is strong participation. Please click here and donate today. Your funds will be used solely to further our mission. Donate Now Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc 1415 Panther Lane Naples, FL 34109 You are receiving this email because you have subscribed on the website: www.savevanderbiltbeach.com. Unsubscribe 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:epircio@verizon.net Sent:Tuesday, February 4, 2020 4:36 PM To:SchmidtCorby; SaboJames Subject:Comments regarding One Naples Attachments:Application to Amend Growth Management Plan of Collier County by Stock Development.docx EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello, Please incorporate the attached comments as part of the application for the One Naples development at Vanderbilt Beach Road. Corby, we would like to discuss the items at our meeting with you tomorrow, Thank you Elizabeth Pircio Barefoot Pelican Condominium 271 Southbay Drive, Unit 226 Naples, FL 34108 epircio@verizon.net 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Application to Amend Growth Management Plan of Collier County by Stock Development-One Naples PL20190000696 and PL20190000697 Comments to letter of April 3, 2019 from Corby Schmidt and submission 1/20/2020 by Hole Montes for the developer. Meeting – February 5, 2020 - One Naples Committee of Barefoot Pelican @ Corby Schmidt 1. A list of parcels has been assembled that barely meet the criteria for a Small- Scale change to the Growth Management Plan. (5 acres includes public roads which should be excluded) 2. New Zoning will be called Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict if amendment is approved. 3. Requirements in Schmidt’s letter state that “preservation of view corridors, light and air movements” and “open space relationships and view of vision to the Gulf of Mexico and the Vanderbilt Lagoon” are important to the development of this location. (p3) a. Double towers stretching 240 feet into the air will totally impede the view, light and air movements and open space of the current neighbors b. Mid-risers stretching 87 feet into the air will impede the view of the Vanderbilt Lagoon as well as cause a cavern effect for our condos increasing wind flow and noise. Zero setbacks on Southbay Drive will totally eliminate our Western view towards the Gulf of Mexico. 4. Stock maintains that the amendment for zoning is not that important because the property “is not located within an area of critical state concern” (p3) a. The property is located across the street from one of the best beaches in the country and one that is enjoyed by many residents of Collier County. To add an additional 500 to 1000 people onto this beach will make it impossible for the residents to find a patch of sand to use during season. b. The property is located in the Coastal High Hazard Zone which has understandably high constraints on building, for safety as well as environmental reasons. The County should not be allowing more concrete and asphalt coverings on currently permeable surfaces. We must not impede the natural absorption of water in the Coastal High Hazard Zone. 5. Schmidt’s letter states that the developer must “address all the impacts to the surrounding area in a narrative.” In this narrative, the developer must prove why this development is appropriate for this location. (p4) 6. Schmidt’s letter further states that the developer must prove that the “Growth Management Plan Amendment is needed.” This should not mean that the developer needs the amendment in order to build his development. It should mean that the County will only approve the Amendment if it is good and needed by and for the residents of the County. 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) page 2 7. “Impact of unintended consequences on surrounding properties” must be addressed by the developer. a. Some of the impacts will be our loss of view to the Gulf of Mexico and the Lagoon. b. An increase in traffic to over 3,000 cars per day at the site will create bottlenecks at many locations according to the developers traffic study. c. The current actual usage of the parcel has a very low impact on the traffic because of the current lack of parking. Therefore, the study comparing C-3 traffic with PUD proposed traffic is meaningless. d. The developer’s investment in these parcels are forcing him to build a development that is too large and will adversely impact the Vanderbilt Beach Neighborhood. e. Emergency and safety vehicles will be unable to access the neighborhood at times. Turning movements of vehicles will cause danger for the walkers, cycles, and other residents going to the beach. f. Egress to One Naples will be across the street from the Parking Garage creating another dangerous intersection on Vanderbilt Beach Road by limiting visibility to people trying to exit and again putting bikers and walkers in danger. g. Service vehicles will be using Southbay Drive to service this development and will block regular traffic, walkers and bikers creating a danger to the residents. Service vehicles will have to break the law in order to make deliveries because of lack of parking. h. Vanderbilt Beach is often at maximum use and the additional 500 to 1000 people will be an unworkable situation. i. An additional 500 to 1000 people will be driving, biking, and walking in the neighborhood. Vanderbilt Beach is enjoyed by all the residents of Collier County and their use of the beach should not be compromised by this over-development. j. There will be a loss of the integrity of the Vanderbilt Lagoon with the additional 99 boat slips. These boat slips will restrict a Florida navigable water way. The Vanderbilt Lagoon is an environmentally threatened waterway and the addition of more people, more trash, more gasoline and oil, will increasingly harm the wildlife and plants. k. Market Demand Studies of the necessity of additional boat slips in the Lagoon will show that currently the Regatta has 37 of their 55 boat slips available for sale or not being used. Currently of the 60 units in Barefoot Pelican, 5 are up for sale. There is no need for a development of this size in this area. 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 3 Development on these parcels of land will be difficult at best. Trying to introduce 240 units of residential and commercial development will make it virtually impossible for the developer to adequately address the neighborhood impacts. In Conclusion, the developer has not met the conditions of Corby Schmidt’s letter of April 3, 2019 and the application for the Amendment to the Growth Management Plan should be denied. Respectfully Submitted Elizabeth Pircio 271 Southbay Drive, Unit 226 Naples, FL 34108 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:1lindatorni <1lindatorni@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, February 19, 2020 3:03 PM To:SaboJames Subject:One naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Just want to once again comment on this proposal. We've been owners here at Barefoot Pelican since 1987. We bought here instead of the east coast because we didn't want to just see building walls. Around 10 years ago a company started buying up property as it became availble. From what I understand it was known that this idea of development was on the horizen. No landlords made improvements on property or proper landscaping and maintenance. As the buildings were sold, they either sat there or were torn down. So now I'm hearing, anything is better than what is there now. The fact that it looks so bad is on the then future Stock company. The One Naples plans will directly affect my enjoyment of light, sunsets, and the breeze I get off the gulf. The years it would take of development would affect my air quality negatively. When the Regatta was built I had to replace an air conditioning unit that was only 7 years old. We actually checked into what was allowed to be built around us when we purchased and was happy with zoning and ordinances. To see it even being considered to be changed to such an extreme is like a slap in the face. I know it would bring a lot of property tax to the coffers, but at a high cost to all of us that use Vanderbilt beach and the area. In their November video they talk about beautiful landscaping. I for one realize that with the 10 feet from the road they are asking for would leave me with a wall to look at, the landscaping would not affect me. The pools, fire pits, ect. would be unseen and not used by any of the current Vanderbuilt and Naples Park residents. So that video does no one any good except for prospective owners. I do know that a traffic counter was out there a few years back in late December or early January, not during peak season, but traffic would be a main issue. Emergency response is not the best during peak season at peak hours as it is now. How much longer would increase traffic bring to emergency vehicles to us? They also said there would be a shuttle service to Wiggins Park. Seriously, I live her so I can walk to the beach and back to the condo for lunch, forgotten things ect. The beach is wall to wall people now, and you want to add to it. Another slap in the face. We enjoy walking to the beach, maybe getting an ice cream cone along the way. Buying sunscreen or a cold drink along the way. I am begging you to please bring keep and bring back the character of what was so enjoyable to this area, not destroy it by these hideous buildings. Linda Torni Dabelstein 271 Southbay Drive Unit 241 Naples Florida Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S8. 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:Shahriar Ghoddousi <s.ghoddousi@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, February 19, 2020 9:54 AM To:Bob Massey Cc:SaboJames; Richard Redfern; Pam Pettit; Sue Massey Subject:Re: One Naples Meeting EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. James, I 100% agree with the questions that was raised by Mr. Massey. This is not a proper way to treat local residents. You are immensely limiting residents participation by choosing the wrong location and wrong time of the day as well as wrong time of the year for the meeting while you know most of us are not here during the summer. I appreciate and request your consideration with the above issues. Dr. Shari Ghoddousi On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 09:46, Bob Massey <bmassey45@me.com> wrote: James ‐ A couple questions: Why are you holding this meeting at a location that is inconvenient for the residents of Vanderbilt Beach? Why in the middle of rush hour when traffic on Immokolee Road is at its peak? A meeting at St John’s Catholic Church makes more sense. Just wondering! Why are the meetings with the Commissioners and Stock scheduled for June and September when most residents of Naples are back up North? How could Stock possibly believe we would want this structure with all the deviations they have requested? Absurd! Thanks for your attention. Robert Massey Sent from my iPhone ‐‐ Shari R Ghoddousi 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:Bob Massey <bmassey45@me.com> Sent:Wednesday, February 19, 2020 9:46 AM To:SaboJames Cc:Shari Ghoddousi; Richard Redfern; Pam Pettit; Sue Massey Subject:One Naples Meeting EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. James - A couple questions: Why are you holding this meeting at a location that is inconvenient for the residents of Vanderbilt Beach? Why in the middle of rush hour when traffic on Immokolee Road is at its peak? A meeting at St John’s Catholic Church makes more sense. Just wondering! Why are the meetings with the Commissioners and Stock scheduled for June and September when most residents of Naples are back up North? How could Stock possibly believe we would want this structure with all the deviations they have requested? Absurd! Thanks for your attention. Robert Massey Sent from my iPhone 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:GoodnerAngela Sent:Monday, February 24, 2020 11:42 AM To:SaboJames Subject:RE: One Naples Planned Unit Development Rezone Neighborhood Information Meeting Sorry, James, I am just seeing this. I’m trying to use threads in my email, and I hate it. He did have a meeting Thursday night, and it was with the Naples Park Area Association, and apparently they did eat him alive! I guess the NIM has been moved now to St. John the Evangelist? Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator Andy Solis, Esq., District 2 Commissioner Collier County Board of County Commissioners Phone: 239.252.8602 Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE! Under Florida Law, e‐mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e‐mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone at 239‐252‐8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E, Suite 303, Naples, FL 34112. From: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 5:13 PM To: GoodnerAngela <Angela.Goodner@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: One Naples Planned Unit Development Rezone Neighborhood Information Meeting Is it with One Naples concerned residents? Respectfully, C. James Sabo, AICP Principal Planner Zoning Division James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2708 “Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT.” 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: GoodnerAngela <Angela.Goodner@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 5:09 PM To: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: One Naples Planned Unit Development Rezone Neighborhood Information Meeting Why would they say that?!? Thanks so much for getting back to me before tonight. They are going to eat him alive as it is! Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator Andy Solis, Esq., District 2 Commissioner Collier County Board of County Commissioners Phone: 239.252.8602 Under Florida Law, e‐mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e‐mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone at 239‐252‐ 8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E, Suite 303, Naples, FL 34112. On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 5:08 PM ‐0500, "SaboJames" <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Not at this time, too many issues outstanding. Also, there is a great deal of opposition to this project. We intend to be sure it is ready for public hearing before proceeding. Respectfully, C. James Sabo, AICP Principal Planner Zoning Division James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2708 “Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT.” Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: GoodnerAngela <Angela.Goodner@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 1:59 PM To: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: One Naples Planned Unit Development Rezone Neighborhood Information Meeting Thanks, James ‐ do you think those dates are accurate / likely from the county’s perspective? Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator Andy Solis, Esq., District 2 Commissioner 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 3 Collier County Board of County Commissioners Phone: 239.252.8602 Under Florida Law, e‐mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e‐mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone at 239‐252‐ 8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E, Suite 303, Naples, FL 34112. On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 1:51 PM ‐0500, "SaboJames" <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Angela, The project is sill under review and is not yet scheduled for public hearing. They have not yet held their NIM and that meeting is scheduled for March 3, 2020 at 5:30pm at Catholic Church on 111th Street near Vanderbilt Beach. I am pretty sure that the rumor comes from the meetings Stock Development has held with the community and they probably announced the public hearing dates themselves. Respectfully, C. James Sabo, AICP Principal Planner Zoning Division James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2708 “Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT.” Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: GoodnerAngela <Angela.Goodner@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 10:35 AM To: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: One Naples Planned Unit Development Rezone Neighborhood Information Meeting Hi, James – has this project been scheduled yet for the Planning Commission and BCC? We are getting reports that it is scheduled for this summer (June and Sept). Just wanted to check on the accuracy of that information. As you can imagine, there are lots of rumors being passed around on this proposal. Thanks in advance for letting me know. Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator Andy Solis, Esq., District 2 Commissioner Collier County Board of County Commissioners Phone: 239.252.8602 Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE! 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4 Under Florida Law, e‐mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e‐mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone at 239‐252‐8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E, Suite 303, Naples, FL 34112. From: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 4:25 PM To: Steve Perkins <sperki@gmail.com> Cc: SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: One Naples Planned Unit Development Rezone Neighborhood Information Meeting Mr. Perkins, The meeting is open to the public. I don’t know how attendance is controlled. Residents within 500 feet of the project received letters from the developer. Respectfully, C. James Sabo, AICP Principal Planner Zoning Division James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2708 “Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT.” Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Steve Perkins <sperki@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 8:00 PM To: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples Planned Unit Development Rezone Neighborhood Information Meeting EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Is this meeting open to the public? How will attendance be controlled, First Come First Serve seating, RSVP, or invite only? 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 5 Thank you Sir, Steven W. Perkins 239‐594‐0399 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:Buzz Victor <buzz@unitedstor-all.com> Sent:Wednesday, February 19, 2020 6:06 AM To:SaboJames Subject:One Naples Question EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi, Jim, I have been reviewing the recent updates to the One Naples project, and a couple of items confuse me. In the Landscape Review, the corrections below show that they have been “resolved,” but in both cases the Staff states that they cannot support the various deviations. Am I missing something? Correction 3: Miscellaneous Corrections Status:Resolved Date Status Changed:02/12/2020 Comments:Regarding deviation 4, the LDC allows for up to 50% of the foundation planting to be located in buffers and also allows for decorative paving to count for up to 20% of the required foundation planting area and planted trellises to count for up to 15% of the foundation planting area. Due to the different options for meeting the required foundation planting offered by the LDC, staff cannot support this deviation Correction 4: Miscellaneous Corrections Status:Resolved Date Status Changed:02/12/2020 Comments:Staff cannot support deviation 5. Due to diseases such as ganoderma with no treatment that affect palm trees, staff cannot support this deviation. This deviation could potentially result in the loss of 70% of the required trees. Thanks for helping me to understand. Best, Buzz Buzz Victor 5650 Greenwood Pl. Bl. Suite 143 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 303‐290‐9100 303‐290‐1886 Fax 303‐810‐7374 Cell buzz@unitedstor‐all.com Naples Office: 1415 Panther Lane Naples, FL 34109 239‐591‐6212 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:Steve Valdivia <stevonmfl@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, February 9, 2020 2:34 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Re: Thanks EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Jim I would like to send this to owners and want to be sure of the basis for the statements. Please review and call at earliest convenience. Steven @ (505) 4595006 ---- Helping the new One Naples fit the Collier County Land Development Code: Collier Planning Dept's Land Development Code (LDC) applies a grading scale for proposed developments. This LDC scale helps evaluate the overall impact a proposed development might have on a subject community. This LDC code is the product of architects, designers, developers and planner's efforts over time and helps assure positive community ambiance, livability and thus desirability and increasing values. It has served the county well. The scale ranges from zero to one-hundred with zero being the absolute bottom, or baseline of that code. In essence, developments should not be at or near zero but should strive to rate as high above zero as possible as higher ratings reflect enhanced community impact and improved community outcomes over time. On the other hand, the "zero" baseline should not be violated under any circumstances. However, for One Naples, Stock is asking the County to approve Deviations rated significantly below the LDC zero baseline to as low as -15, or 15 points below the zero baseline. Per these guidelines, such approval has a greater probability of resulting in negative impacts on the overall community ambiance, livability and perhaps on property values. ----- Steve Valdivia On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:08 AM SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Mr. Valdivia, The link is here. Enter the encryption code, then in the dialogue box enter PL20190000697, then scroll down to documents and images and click there. All the documents I have are available to view. I hope this helps. Have a good weekend. 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 http://cvportal.colliergov.net/CityViewWeb/Planning/Locator Respectfully, C. James Sabo, AICP Principal Planner Zoning Division James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2708 “Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT.” Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Steve Valdivia <stevonmfl@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2020 9:13 AM To: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Thanks EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I very much appreciate the info. Please forward links as mentioned. Steve Valdivia 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 3 Owner of units at Barefoot Pelican and Vanderbilt Palms 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:Buzz Victor <buzz@unitedstor-all.com> Sent:Wednesday, February 19, 2020 2:45 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Serious Notice Probelm One Naples Attachments:IMG_2636 (002).jpg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. HI, Jim, I just lefyt you a voice mail. I think that there is acnotice problem regarding Stock’s One Naples NIM. Your website shows: Attached is a photo of the Hole Montes February 14 notice letter sent to property owners showing the meeting at the same time on the same date, but at a different location. I try to stay on top of things, and even I am confused. What’s the real location. Is his notice legal, now that your site shows something different. What about the folks who don’t get the mailing, but want to come and rely on your information? Buzz Buzz Victor 5650 Greenwood Plaza Blvd. Suite 143 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 303‐290‐9100 303‐290‐9100 Fax 303‐810‐7374 Cell Naples office: 1415 Panther Lane Naples, FL 34109 239‐591‐6212 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:epircio@verizon.net Sent:Monday, February 24, 2020 5:40 PM To:SaboJames Subject:width of Southbay EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello Jim, Hope you will answer this question for us at Barefoot Pelican. We have been discussing the front yard setbacks of the two mid-rise buildings on Southbay Drive. After the construction will Southbay Drive have a width of 50 feet plus 5 feet each of sidewalks on each side? If so, then the One Naples front yard setbacks as requested will abut the sidewalk of the newly widened road. Right now the asphalt on Southbay is currently only 17 feet wide and I do not think adding sidewalks to it will make for a legal road. Correct/ Thanks for your assistance Betty epircio@verizon.net 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Buzz Victor <buzz@unitedstor-all.com> Sent:Wednesday, February 19, 2020 6:06 AM To:SaboJames Subject:One Naples Question EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi, Jim, I have been reviewing the recent updates to the One Naples project, and a couple of items confuse me. In the Landscape Review, the corrections below show that they have been “resolved,” but in both cases the Staff states that they cannot support the various deviations. Am I missing something? Correction 3: Miscellaneous Corrections Status:Resolved Date Status Changed:02/12/2020 Comments:Regarding deviation 4, the LDC allows for up to 50% of the foundation planting to be located in buffers and also allows for decorative paving to count for up to 20% of the required foundation planting area and planted trel lises to count for up to 15% of the foundation planting area. Due to the different options for meeting the required foundation planting offered by the LDC, staff cannot support this deviation Correction 4: Miscellaneous Corrections Status:Resolved Date Status Changed:02/12/2020 Comments:Staff cannot support deviation 5. Due to diseases such as ganoderma with no treatment that affect palm trees, staff cannot support this deviation. This deviation could potentially result in the loss of 70% of the required trees. Thanks for helping me to understand. Best, Buzz Buzz Victor 5650 Greenwood Pl. Bl. Suite 143 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 303-290-9100 303-290-1886 Fax 303-810-7374 Cell buzz@unitedstor-all.com Naples Office: 1415 Panther Lane Naples, FL 34109 239-591-6212 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Bob Massey <bmassey45@me.com> Sent:Wednesday, February 19, 2020 9:46 AM To:SaboJames Cc:Shari Ghoddousi; Richard Redfern; Pam Pettit; Sue Massey Subject:One Naples Meeting EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. James - A couple questions: Why are you holding this meeting at a location that is inconvenient for the residents of Vanderbilt Beach? Why in the middle of rush hour when traffic on Immokolee Road is at its peak? A meeting at St John’s Catholic Church makes more sense. Just wondering! Why are the meetings with the Commissioners and Stock scheduled for June and September when most residents of Naples are back up North? How could Stock possibly believe we would want this structure with all the deviations they have requested? Absurd! Thanks for your attention. Robert Massey Sent from my iPhone 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Application to Amend Growth Management Plan of Collier County by Stock Development-One Naples PL20190000696 and PL20190000697 Comments to letter of April 3, 2019 from Corby Schmidt and submission 1/20/2020 by Hole Montes for the developer. Meeting – February 5, 2020 - One Naples Committee of Barefoot Pelican @ Corby Schmidt 1. A list of parcels has been assembled that barely meet the criteria for a Small- Scale change to the Growth Management Plan. (5 acres includes public roads which should be excluded) 2. New Zoning will be called Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict if amendment is approved. 3. Requirements in Schmidt’s letter state that “preservation of view corridors, light and air movements” and “open space relationships and view of vision to the Gulf of Mexico and the Vanderbilt Lagoon” are important to the development of this location. (p3) a. Double towers stretching 240 feet into the air will totally impede the view, light and air movements and open space of the current neighbors b. Mid-risers stretching 87 feet into the air will impede the view of the Vanderbilt Lagoon as well as cause a cavern effect for our condos increasing wind flow and noise. Zero setbacks on Southbay Drive will totally eliminate our Western view towards the Gulf of Mexico. 4. Stock maintains that the amendment for zoning is not that important because the property “is not located within an area of critical state concern” (p3) a. The property is located across the street from one of the best beaches in the country and one that is enjoyed by many residents of Collier County. To add an additional 500 to 1000 people onto this beach will make it impossible for the residents to find a patch of sand to use during season. b. The property is located in the Coastal High Hazard Zone which has understandably high constraints on building, for safety as well as environmental reasons. The County should not be allowing more concrete and asphalt coverings on currently permeable surfaces. We must not impede the natural absorption of water in the Coastal High Hazard Zone. 5. Schmidt’s letter states that the developer must “address all the impacts to the surrounding area in a narrative.” In this narrative, the developer must prove why this development is appropriate for this location. (p4) 6. Schmidt’s letter further states that the developer must prove that the “Growth Management Plan Amendment is needed.” This should not mean that the developer needs the amendment in order to build his development. It should mean that the County will only approve the Amendment if it is good and needed by and for the residents of the County. 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) page 2 7. “Impact of unintended consequences on surrounding properties” must be addressed by the developer. a. Some of the impacts will be our loss of view to the Gulf of Mexico and the Lagoon. b. An increase in traffic to over 3,000 cars per day at the site will create bottlenecks at many locations according to the developers traffic study. c. The current actual usage of the parcel has a very low impact on the traffic because of the current lack of parking. Therefore, the study comparing C-3 traffic with PUD proposed traffic is meaningless. d. The developer’s investment in these parcels are forcing him to build a development that is too large and will adversely impact the Vanderbilt Beach Neighborhood. e. Emergency and safety vehicles will be unable to access the neighborhood at times. Turning movements of vehicles will cause danger for the walkers, cycles, and other residents going to the beach. f. Egress to One Naples will be across the street from the Parking Garage creating another dangerous intersection on Vanderbilt Beach Road by limiting visibility to people trying to exit and again putting bikers and walkers in danger. g. Service vehicles will be using Southbay Drive to service this development and will block regular traffic, walkers and bikers creating a danger to the residents. Service vehicles will have to break the law in order to make deliveries because of lack of parking. h. Vanderbilt Beach is often at maximum use and the additional 500 to 1000 people will be an unworkable situation. i. An additional 500 to 1000 people will be driving, biking, and walking in the neighborhood. Vanderbilt Beach is enjoyed by all the residents of Collier County and their use of the beach should not be compromised by this over-development. j. There will be a loss of the integrity of the Vanderbilt Lagoon with the additional 99 boat slips. These boat slips will restrict a Florida navigable water way. The Vanderbilt Lagoon is an environmentally threatened waterway and the addition of more people, more trash, more gasoline and oil, will increasingly harm the wildlife and plants. k. Market Demand Studies of the necessity of additional boat slips in the Lagoon will show that currently the Regatta has 37 of their 55 boat slips available for sale or not being used. Currently of the 60 units in Barefoot Pelican, 5 are up for sale. There is no need for a development of this size in this area. 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 3 Development on these parcels of land will be difficult at best. Trying to introduce 240 units of residential and commercial development will make it virtually impossible for the developer to adequately address the neighborhood impacts. In Conclusion, the developer has not met the conditions of Corby Schmidt’s letter of April 3, 2019 and the application for the Amendment to the Growth Management Plan should be denied. Respectfully Submitted Elizabeth Pircio 271 Southbay Drive, Unit 226 Naples, FL 34108 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:epircio@verizon.net Sent:Sunday, February 16, 2020 12:42 PM To:johnbamberger@gmail.com; mcbc71@verizon.net; aldelligatti@yahoo.com; FialaDonna; davidgalloway239@gmail.com; suegraves132@hotmail.com; kathyhh42@gmail.com; zman1994@gmail.com; jcleveland@e-wasteonline.com; jeremiahl@sandcastlecm.com; ckasper@hullinc.com; Zimmerohio1@aol.com; pkmarbach@icloud.com; bamaher55 @gmail.com; michael.bosi@colliercountyfl.gov; SawyerMichael; npaa4u@gmail.com; ritalnappi@gmail.com; patwoolley@dsbcglobal.net; rdpritt@aol.com; kathyrobbins@yahoo.com; krosenb@hotmail.com; SaboJames; SaundersBurt; SchmidtCorby; Tabletop248@gmail.com; nsebora@charter.net; jennifer@lifestylespecialist.net; mstra5050@gmail.com; TaylorPenny; Ctheard65 @aol.com; thebresnahans@gmail.com; kensredbarn@aol.com; TWard@brouse.com; vanderbiltbeach54@yahoo.com; wdamman@autosteel.com; scott@swhitecpa.com; Kay.pat.Woolley@gmail.com Subject:Fwd: Meeting Invitation and Update EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please read to gain knowledge Please register to form a coalition Please donate to fund professionals to help us protect our Vanderbilt Beach neighborhoods information about our plans and progress No images? Click here To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. OUR MISSION Our mission is to protect the residents of the Vanderbilt Beach and Naples Park neighborhoods from unreasonable development and, in a more general sense, to protect all of Collier County’s residents who are users of Vanderbilt Beach, itself, by promoting continued and improving access. IN THIS EMAIL… 1. Update on registrations and fundraising 2. Invitation to Informational meetings 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 3. Details of meetings with County staff 4. A couple of requests 5. A final, very important note 1. WHAT A WEEK IT HAS BEEN! Our base of registrants has swelled beyond 350 as of this writing. Donations exceed $11,500. We look forward to the day that we can announce a "membership" in excess of 500. You can help. Tell your friends and neighbors about www.savevanderbiltbeach.com. Today’s article in the Naples Daily News has had an immediate positive impact on registrations. See it here. Naples News Article Stock’s statements and arguments in the piece were typical of what has been said before. Much of it distorts the reality of the company's filings with the County. Some if it is simply flawed. Please review our thoughts about the arguments here. Stock's Flawed Arguments It was interesting to learn, in the article, that the probable meeting date of the Planning Board is in June, and that of the County Commissioners in September. Once again, Stock plans for a time when many of us are not typically here. That puts an increased burden on our year-round residents to plan to attend those events. 2. MEETING INVITATION We will be holding two informational meetings at The Naples Park Association Building located at 654 104th Ave. February 26th at 7:30pm 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 3 And February 27th at 7:30pm (The content of each meeting will be the same. Come only one of the two nights.) This will be your first chance to share with us your hopes and desires for the development, to learn more about the process Stock must go through, and to hear about our ideas and strategies to bring the project more in line with the interests of the neighborhood. Please make an effort to attend on one of the nights. We will have yard signs available especially for those who live on generally busier streets. SPECIAL INCENTIVE: The first 75 people to attend each evening will get a free Save Vanderbilt Beach tee shirt. (Additional shirts will be available at a cost of $5.00.) To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Wearing these shirts will introduce others to the cause. Wearing them to public meetings of the Planning Board and the County Commissioners, and MOST IMMEDIATELY, at the Stock's required Neighborhood Information Meeting (March 3 at Hodges University at I-75 and Immokalee at 5:30pm) is a dramatic and impactful way to show just how many of us are concerned with the proposed project. 3. MEETINGS WITH COUNTY STAFF Over the last several weeks, a small group of us have met with County staff who are working on the Stock application. Present at the meetings were Jim Sabo, jamessabo@colliergov.net, who is the lead planner on this project, Corby Schmidt, CorbySchmidt@colliergov.net, who takes responsibility for the Comprehensive Plan portion of the application, and Mike Sawyer, michaelsawyer@colliergov.net, in the transportation section. 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4 In the meetings, we were able to present our general concerns about the project and to ask specific questions about the Stock filings and the County responses. You can access these documents here. Stock Filings, County Responses Each of the staff members stressed that it is still early in the process, and that there will be many gives and takes between Stock and the County. Our assessment is that while that may be so, our purpose is best served by insisting that Stock must develop to existing zoning codes and regulations. More about these meetings on February 26th and 27th. Note that there has been one minor success. Deviation 7, which Stock requested to allow him to have a sidewalk on only one side of Southbay Drive, has been withdrawn. He has amended his design to have sidewalks on both sides. Hopefully there will be many more, and more important, victories. 4. A Couple of Requests We are making good progress reaching residents in Vanderbilt Beach, Naples Park, and Pelican Bay. Our activity on www.nextdoor.com has been effective in these neighborhoods, but as NextDoor only allows access to residents within each specific community, we cannot access communities other than our own. As you will learn more about at our informational meetings on the 26th and 27th, those communities that lie to the east, especially along Vanderbilt Beach Road, are of special importance to us in achieving the County Commissioners' vote that will be required to achieve our goals. If you know people living in any one of the following neighborhoods, please encourage them to register with us, to go on to the nextdoor.com site serving their neighborhoods, and to share our message. The communities are: Longshore Lakes, Quail Creek, Quail West, Vineyards, Olde Cypress, Esplanade, Quarry, Heritage Bay and Naples National Golf Club (in East Naples). Our experience shows us that social media is vital to getting our word out. Unfortunately, it is an area in which we have very limited experience. If you, or someone you know, does have that experience, and who would like to give us a hand, please have them contact us at info@savevanderbiltbeach.com. Thanks for your help! 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 5 5. The Importance of Donating It is critical to our success that we have a strong representation of those who have registered as donors as well. Nothing says “commitment” more than backing up words with actions. As I have stated before, although “more is better,” the important thing is that we can show that the vast majority of those registered have donated. The amount does not matter, $10, $20, $50. What matters is strong participation. Please click here and donate today. Your funds will be used solely to further our mission. Donate Now Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc 1415 Panther Lane Naples, FL 34109 You are receiving this email because you have subscribed on the website: www.savevanderbiltbeach.com. Unsubscribe 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:epircio@verizon.net Sent:Monday, February 24, 2020 5:40 PM To:SaboJames Subject:width of Southbay EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello Jim, Hope you will answer this question for us at Barefoot Pelican. We have been discussing the front yard setbacks of the two mid-rise buildings on Southbay Drive. After the construction will Southbay Drive have a width of 50 feet plus 5 feet each of sidewalks on each side? If so, then the One Naples front yard setbacks as requested will abut the sidewalk of the newly widened road. Right now the asphalt on Southbay is currently only 17 feet wide and I do not think adding sidewalks to it will make for a legal road. Correct/ Thanks for your assistance Betty epircio@verizon.net 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: February 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:epircio@verizon.net Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2020 10:25 AM To:SaboJames Subject:Re: Neighborhood Mtg 3/3/2020 Update Location EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thanks Jim. We will all be there decked out in red ! Hope to see you there Betty Sent from AOL Mobile Mail Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com On Tuesday, February 18, 2020, SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Hello Betty, You probably already know, but the Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) for One Naples is at St John Catholic Church on 111th Street at 5:30PM on 3/3/2020. I wanted you to know in case you wish to notify people outside the required notice area? Have a great day. Respectfully, C. James Sabo, AICP Principal Planner Zoning Division James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2708 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) To Mr. James Sabo, Principle Planner, Collier County Planning Commission From: Naples Park Area Association: President: D. Hunter BOD: N. Royal, M. Oenick, B. Chapman, S. Grace, F. Lombard, M. Lucanegro, F. Murrin, D, Privitera, M. Straight, J. Myers, J. Rohleder https://naplesparkareaassociation.org email: NPAA4U@gmail.com RE: OneNaples PL20190000697 and PL20190000696 We are sending this letter to express the concerns of the membership of the Naples Park Area Association (NPAA) regarding the proposed OneNaples development across from the Vanderbilt Beach County Park. (app #PL20190000697) as well as the Small-Sale Amendment to the Collier County Future Land Use Element (SSAFLUE), [PL20190000696-Exhibit IV.B.1] We appreciate all the County has done and is doing to make Vanderbilt Beach and other County beaches attractive and accessible destinations for County residents and visitors alike. We appreciate the transparency of the planning process and our ability to participate in that process. We believe the current land management plan is sound and current zoning regulations provide for development that fits the property and protects our County’s environment. At the January 2020 regular meeting of the NPAA, the members outlined the following issues and concerns for the ONENAPLES proposal: ● Project demands multiple variances to current County requirements for: o Building height o Buffer zone/set-back o Various landscaping/green space requirements o Sidewalk/bike-lane/pathway requirements for setback ● Project is inconsistent with allowed residential density (2.5 times the current requirements). That density will be coupled with additional daily density and traffic of the proposed hotel and commercial space. ● Lack of adherence to current zoning setback requirement will further complicate safe and reliable Vanderbilt Beach access for bikes, and pedestrians ● Lack of ability to widen Vanderbilt Beach Road or Gulf shore drive will further complicate the traffic flow from US 41 to Vanderbilt Beach County Park ● Lack of ability to widen Vanderbilt Beach Road and current planned egress from the OneNaples property will promote more congestion getting to the parking garage and to Vanderbilt Beach Road. As traffic builds the cut through of traffic to the lights at 91st and 99th Ave will increase and impact safe travel for pedestrians and bikes and children going to the elementary school. ● Increase in traffic and lack of access to the beach will impact the attractiveness of Collier County as a tourist destination. ● Increased water traffic and proposed boat slips will negatively impact the environmental of Vanderbilt Lagoon We ask that the County deny the Small-Sale Amendment to the Collier County future land use element (SSAFLUE) [PL20190000696- Exhibit IV.B.1. Approval of that amendment will change FLUE to meet this specific Developer’s needs and set a precedent for future overly dense developments. We realize Stock has a right to develop the parcel they have assembled. We are supportive of a development that complies to all current (2019-2020) county and local growth management policies, zoning and regulations (i.e. no variances). We appreciate that the review process the County uses to assess new development and ensure healthy growth that will preserve the beauty of the County for County residents and visitors. Be assured we will remain involved in all parts of the process to which the public can participate. Respectfully Submitted, Maureen Straight, Board Member [Civic Committee] for the BOD and Membership of NPAA Please attach this letter to application: PL20190000697 and PL20190000696 Cc: Commissioner; A. Solis 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:StrainMark Sent:Tuesday, March 3, 2020 2:46 PM To:SaboJames Subject:FW: One Naples Please process as typical Mark Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: richroni gallagher <randrgall@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2020 7:21 PM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Stock Development has submitted proposals and plans to Collier County seeking to build One Naples across from Vanderbilt Beach in Naples. The scale of the project has created much “buzz” in the community and I wanted to share my concerns. Traffic There is no need for expansive traffic studies. Any local resident or visitor to Vanderbilt has experienced the congestion at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive. That corner is perilous for pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles alike. Gulf Shore Drive is bookended by two traffic “choke points”: The aforementioned intersection at the entry to Vanderbilt Beach to the south and the entry to Delnor‐Wiggins State Park to the north. Residents along Gulf Shore Drive have no other options. Each of these intersections get backed up from the beach traffic and pose significant challenges to those residents when accessing or departing their homes. Local residents have all observed emergency response vehicles snarled in the beach traffic at this location. As our dedicated police, fire and medical professionals attest, every second counts when responding to an emergency. Hence, for the reasons cited above, I plead the Collier County Planning Commissioners and County Commissioners to refrain from affording the developers of One Naples any variances, re‐zoning or amendments that would allow them to add a single vehicle above and beyond what they can presently develop as of right. Beach Congestion 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 County Commissioners have previously acknowledged the congestion on Vanderbilt Beach. Residents and visitors struggle to find an available patch of sand to place their towels or chairs‐ never mind umbrellas. The consideration of the parking garage at Clam Pass and remarks from the Commissioners at those hearings to find appropriate solutions to ameliorate beach overcrowding are evidence of their recognition of the problem. Hence, I plead the Collier County Planning Commissioners and County Commissioners to refrain from affording the developers of One Naples any variances, re‐zoning or amendments that would allow them to add a single residence above and beyond what they can presently develop as of right. Coastal Hazard Zone The One Naples development is only feet away from Vanderbilt Beach and clearly in the Coastal Hazard Zone. The fear and chaos we experienced with Hurricane Irma are still fresh and raw. Hence, I plead the Collier County Planning Commissioners and County Commissioners to refrain from affording the developers of One Naples any variances, re‐zoning or amendments that would allow them to place a single family into the coastal hazard zone above and beyond what they can presently develop as of right. Scale/ Setbacks There has been much discourse about the appropriateness of the proposed height of the development. The plans submitted by Stock depict (2) 18 story towers. Yes, there are similar tall Towers in Collier County and along the shore. However, in no cases are those existing towers positioned anywhere near the property line and in close proximity to a public street and sidewalk. In fact, Stock’s submission clearly shows portions of their towers are setback a mere ten feet from the property line along Vanderbilt Beach Road. A building soaring 180‐200 feet high with only a 10’ setback is oppressive. The resulting street wall is unprecedented in Naples and more conducive to the concrete canyons of Manhattan‐ not Collier County. Hence, I plead the Collier County Planning Commissioners and County Commissioners to refrain from affording the developers of One Naples any variances, re‐zoning or amendments that would allow them to position a tower any taller and any closer to the property line they can presently develop as of right. Environmental The adjoining Turkey Bay is a beautiful waterway with abundant sea life and wildlife. Our natural habitats are Collier County’s greatest assets and yet a very delicate and vulnerable one. Hence, I plead the Collier County Planning Commissioners and County Commissioners to refrain from affording the developers of One Naples any variances, re‐zoning or amendments that would allow them to create a marina with a single boat slip above and beyond what they can presently develop as of right. I have no objections to Stock developing the parcel they have assembled and would actually welcome them building a complex consistent with existing Collier County zoning regulations and Growth Management Plan. The “let me build what I want or else” rhetoric heard from Stock recently is unproductive and alienating‐ not to mention idle threats. I’m 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 3 sure there is no need to remind our Collier County Planning Commissioners of your oath of office and I hope you conduct yourselves in this matter to protect and serve your constituents. Thank you very much. 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:Guy Kellam <gkellam@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, March 4, 2020 1:33 AM To:SaboJames; GoodnerAngela; info@stockdevelopment.com; SolisAndy; NPAA4U@gmail.com Cc:TaylorPenny; FialaDonna; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; R. Kellam Subject:One Naples Debacle EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Simple premise.... Stock cobbled together the property around Vanderbilt beach, knowing the current C-3 zoning, with the realization that it was a non-starter by their own admission, with the expectation that they could bulldoze their legacy on that little corner. One Naples project advances; neighborhood meeting planned https://www.naplesnews.com/story/money/business/local/2020/03/02/one-naples-moving-ahead-neighborhood- meeting-planned-tuesday/4928571002/ "His team, he said, hasn't even attempted to draw up plans for a purely, or mostly commercial project." Stock claims to want the best for Naples, but their overreaching plan is certainly not in the best interests of Collier County, including Naples Park and Vanderbilt beach, which I have been a part of for over 20 years. Trying to shoe horn this project into a 5.4 acre site is a nightmare for neighbors like us, including density (44 units vs 16 per acre), building height (235 ft vs 70), marina access, public parking, traffic, emergency response, beach access, environmental impact, set backs (starting at 10ft to 0), coastal high hazards, traffic bypass and quality of life. In the end, all we have are commissioners *like you* who are willing to do the right thing, to protect folks like us who have worked their whole life to experience something as wondrous as this (and to pass on to our children). To this end, I simply ask that you enforce the current zoning or make a case that changing it would benefit the larger community and not someone else's pocket/legacy. And yes, I went to the recent NIM @ St. John the Evangelist Catholic Church(3/2/2020), where Stock's presentation focused on fluff, landscaping and parking garage tech, which seemed more akin to a Real Estate Sales pitch, which the folks in the room weren't buying. And yes, tech won't magically expand the current garage capacity and only annoy those who decide to rip through my Naples Park neighborhood. Regardless of the traffic, folks still need a place to park when the garage is full and a place to rest themselves on the ever restricted public beach (thanks to neighbors like the Ritz) :) In a nutshell, one needs to simply "Support Responsible Development", which seems like a reach here.... Thoughts? 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:JEAN D. BROWN <jdbewb@aol.com> Sent:Monday, March 2, 2020 12:34 PM To:McDanielBill; FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny Cc:SaboJames; SchmidtCorby; SawyerMichael Subject:Vanderbilt Beach Road / One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Vanderbilt Beach Road / One Naples Dear Commisioners, I write this letter to express my concern about traffic nightmare that exists along Vanderbilt Beach Road west from 41 and the ill‐conceived development called One Naples that will make the problem even worse. We have been residents of Pelican Bay for over 15 years and have seen Vanderbillt Beach road evolve from a busy road to a gridlocked one. We now do our best to avoid it in season. When completed, the Naples One proposal will make the traffic problems much worse and during the 5 to 10 years of construction make Vanderbilt Beach a nightmare. In addition to the traffic disaster it will cause, Naples One is totally inappropriate for the area as indicated by the major zoning changes that it requires. That our Commissioners have even condoned the submission of the proposal which so violates the existing zoning limitations suggests that the Commisioners have lost sight of what is best for the people of Collier County. A week ago, I attended a presentation by Stock both to learn how they could possibly address the onerous traffic problems and to learn about the residences. As a result of the presentation, I am so concerned that I am writing this letter. Below are my notes from the meeting discussing the presentation and my concerns. I beg you not to let an influential developer’s ambitions ruin our neighborhood and make an impossible traffic situation worse. Thousands more people will be flocking west along Vanderbilt Beach Road in search of the Gulf waters thanks to last week’s approval of Rivergrass Village. Please don’t add to the frustrated hoards. Rather, direct the County resources to solving the existing problem. Thank you. D Brown NOTES FROM 2.21.20 ONE NAPLES PRESENTATION Conclusions. Traffic problems alone should have resulted in immediate rejection of proposal. It adds hundreds, if not thousands, of cars to the area and removes hundreds of available parking spots in an already gridlocked area. Even under the best of circumstances, years of traffic disruption can be expected from the construction. The proposal constitutes an incomplete agglomeration of parcels and tries to shoehorn inappropriate structures. The proposal creates a private fortress inaccessible to the public and closes public roads that provide the only possible relief to the gridlock regularly experienced in the area. 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 The proposal is ill‐conceived and could risk failure, particularly with a developer with no high rise tower experience. An ill‐timed downturn could delay construction to a decade or longer and even risk partially completed buildings looming over Vanderbilt Beach for years. The property is currently zoned for commercial development, presumably to provided services to the neighboring community. The community relied on the commercial designation and Stock should use its talents to fulfill those intentions, possibly adding needed parking as part of a commercial project. Commisioners should immediately dismiss the proposal so that County personnel can address existing problems faced by the County, rather than working on creating new problems. General comments. Proposal seems like a terribly ill‐conceived Rube Goldberg. The development consists of several disjointed parcels. Some seem jointly owned with others? Parts of the project are separated by public streets, by a low rise apartment building and by the DaRuMa restaurant. Southbay Drive will continue to be a public road and will separate the low rise buildings on the harbor from the towers. Center street will continue up past DaRuMa and then dead‐end. Is it only a matter of time before the apartment building and DaRuMa are acquired and more high rises built? To be feasible, the Development requires the transfer of two streets, exacerbating the already serious traffic congestion in the area. Stock personnel seemed to hint that Southbay Drive would also become a private part of the development. Why Collier County would be willing to give up streets that provide some modicum of relief to the extreme traffic problems of the area is puzzling Because the streets are fundamental to the development, Stock should be required to pay millions based on land prices in Naples. There was no mention of compensation to County for the roads? Hundreds of parking spaces will be lost from the land on which the high rises are to be built and the proposed elimination of parking along Vanderbilt adjacent to the development. The convenience/food stores will be elimated at the corner, thereby eliminating the only support facilities for one of Collier County’s only beaches The Beach Box eatery will be forced to close A shop for coffee is “promised”. The existing real estate office will return, however. This is Stock’s first Tower development. The area will be brightly lit except along Gulfshore where sea turtle restrictions require lower lighting. The environmental and aesthetic effect of the light pollution is yet another concern raised by the project. Condos expected to be in 2,000 to 4,000 sq foot range priced in the $1 to $10 million range. Two towers and 3 lower multistory buildings with approximately 250 units. No beach or harbor access for owners. Unlike many landlocked developments, there is no plan to acquire a nearby parcel to provide beach access for condo owners. Instead, there will be “15” minute (?) ferry transportation to Delnore Wiggins State Park Only condo owners who purchase slips will have access to the harbor. No public access to condos or slips. The development will be gated. 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 3 While it was stated that Southbay Drive will remain public, it seems that the desire to make the development private will inevitably lead to attempts to close Southbay Drive off. There seemed to be some allusion to that possibility by Stock personnel at the meeting. Zoning Currently commercial ‐ 51’ above flood level of 21.5’ or total height of 71.5’? Required for proposed Development: 205’ “zoned height” , 235’ actual height. Even higher with equipment on roof? Stock acquired “the property “ in 2017. However, they seem to be continually acquiring bits and pieces, some as recently as last Fall. Some parcels seem to be co‐owned. Interestingly, a sign on the parcel where 200 ‐300 hundred cars are regularly parked briefly listed the parcel for sale for a few million dollars sometime around 2008‐ 2010. Too bad Collier County did not acquire it for another parking garage. Construction will occur in stages and is dependent on sales results so it could go on for years. Stock’s attempts to address various traffic issues Traffic backing up on Vanderbilt Beach Road at Hammock Oak Dr going West from 41 or going east from the beach. Stock personnel refused to discuss or acknowledge the issue despite repeated requests and descriptions of backups lasting several lights. They tried to assert that the only traffic issues were by the beach and parking garage. Traffic backing up near Vanderbilt Beach. Stock’s analysis/solutions were superficial or mere hyperbole. They blamed inefficiencies with the management of the garage. Stock proposed that parking kiosks be installed like the ones used at Clam Pass Park and by the City of Naples. This would eliminate the backlog caused by the parking lot attendant. They also blamed the current policy of keeping the garage closed for at least 20 minutes and until at least several spaces opened up. They proposed that an app be used and signs installed to alert users that the garage is full. Basically, they want to tell people to “go away”. When asked where beach goers are suppose to go, they said Delnore Wiggins State Park and “other” county beaches. Delnore Wiggins already suffers serious backup and capacity issues as does Clam Pass park three miles south off Seagate and Barefoot Beach, a half hour to the north off the severely congested Bonita Beach Road. They also asserted that pedestrians were a major cause of congestion and that better signage and street markings would help solve the traffic problem.......really? They also stated that under the the County’s method of measuring traffic there is no traffic problem resulting from the project. Inexplicable. The proposals to alleviate inept parking procedures and pedestrian interference ignore the basic problem which is too much traffic and too few parking spots. The project will remove 20 onstreet parking spots and hundreds of parking spaces currently available on the fields proposed to be developed. Using a bathtub as an analogy....the bathtub is full. Their proposals merely fill it faster or organizes the rubber ducks in the tub, but once it is full, it will overflow and make a mess. Also the project actually results in a smaller bath tub! “Could be Worse” argument . An aspect of the presentation which seemed confused was the claim that the current commercial zoning would permit much worse traffic because of the additional hypothetical traffic from a make believe mall. The Mercato was held out as a possibility which seemed silly. A strip mall is the likely type of commercial development for such a modest sized odd‐shaped parcel. There is no actual mall because developers have concluded for whatever reason that it is not commercially feasible. Residents in the area would no doubt embrace access to more commercial services so they didn’t have to battle the traffic to the shopping centers on 41 and beyond. In fact, they probably 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4 relied on the commercial designation with the expectation that additional services would some day be available. If anything, a small local mall could help alleviate the traffic problems by reducing trips up to 41 and beyond. The assertion that a gas station could be built was immediately retracted. In any event, one would hope that environmental regulations would prohibit such a facility. Sent from my iPhone. Pls forgive typos. (:‐) 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:JEAN D. BROWN <jdbewb@aol.com> Sent:Monday, March 2, 2020 12:34 PM To:McDanielBill; FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny Cc:SaboJames; SchmidtCorby; SawyerMichael Subject:Vanderbilt Beach Road / One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Vanderbilt Beach Road / One Naples Dear Commisioners, I write this letter to express my concern about traffic nightmare that exists along Vanderbilt Beach Road west from 41 and the ill-conceived development called One Naples that will make the problem even worse. We have been residents of Pelican Bay for over 15 years and have seen Vanderbillt Beach road evolve from a busy road to a gridlocked one. We now do our best to avoid it in season. When completed, the Naples One proposal will make the traffic problems much worse and during the 5 to 10 years of construction make Vanderbilt Beach a nightmare. In addition to the traffic disaster it will cause, Naples One is totally inappropriate for the area as indicated by the major zoning changes that it requires. That our Commissioners have even condoned the submission of the proposal which so violates the existing zoning limitations suggests that the Commisioners have lost sight of what is best for the people of Collier County. A week ago, I attended a presentation by Stock both to learn how they could possibly address the onerous traffic problems and to learn about the residences. As a result of the presentation, I am so concerned that I am writing this letter. Below are my notes from the meeting discussing the presentation and my concerns. I beg you not to let an influential developer’s ambitions ruin our neighborhood and make an impossible traffic situation worse. Thousands more people will be flocking west along Vanderbilt Beach Road in search of the Gulf waters thanks to last week’s approval of Rivergrass Village. Please don’t add to the frustrated hoards. Rather, direct the County resources to solving the existing problem. Thank you. D Brown NOTES FROM 2.21.20 ONE NAPLES PRESENTATION Conclusions. Traffic problems alone should have resulted in immediate rejection of proposal. It adds hundreds, if not thousands, of cars to the area and removes hundreds of available parking spots in an already gridlocked area. Even under the best of circumstances, years of traffic disruption can be expected from the construction. The proposal constitutes an incomplete agglomeration of parcels and tries to shoehorn inappropriate structures. The proposal creates a private fortress inaccessible to the public and closes public roads that provide the only possible relief to the gridlock regularly experienced in the area. 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 The proposal is ill-conceived and could risk failure, particularly with a developer with no high rise tower experience. An ill-timed downturn could delay construction to a decade or longer and even risk partially completed buildings looming over Vanderbilt Beach for years. The property is currently zoned for commercial development, presumably to provided services to the neighboring community. The community relied on the commercial designation and Stock should use its talents to fulfill those intentions, possibly adding needed parking as part of a commercial project. Commisioners should immediately dismiss the proposal so that County personnel can address existing problems faced by the County, rather than working on creating new problems. General comments. Proposal seems like a terribly ill-conceived Rube Goldberg. The development consists of several disjointed parcels. Some seem jointly owned with others? Parts of the project are separated by public streets, by a low rise apartment building and by the DaRuMa restaurant. Southbay Drive will continue to be a public road and will separate the low rise buildings on the harbor from the towers. Center street will continue up past DaRuMa and then dead-end. Is it only a matter of time before the apartment building and DaRuMa are acquired and more high rises built? To be feasible, the Development requires the transfer of two streets, exacerbating the already serious traffic congestion in the area. Stock personnel seemed to hint that Southbay Drive would also become a private part of the development. Why Collier County would be willing to give up streets that provide some modicum of relief to the extreme traffic problems of the area is puzzling Because the streets are fundamental to the development, Stock should be required to pay millions based on land prices in Naples. There was no mention of compensation to County for the roads? Hundreds of parking spaces will be lost from the land on which the high rises are to be built and the proposed elimination of parking along Vanderbilt adjacent to the development. The convenience/food stores will be elimated at the corner, thereby eliminating the only support facilities for one of Collier County’s only beaches The Beach Box eatery will be forced to close A shop for coffee is “promised”. The existing real estate office will return, however. This is Stock’s first Tower development. The area will be brightly lit except along Gulfshore where sea turtle restrictions require lower lighting. The environmental and aesthetic effect of the light pollution is yet another concern raised by the project. Condos expected to be in 2,000 to 4,000 sq foot range priced in the $1 to $10 million range. Two towers and 3 lower multistory buildings with approximately 250 units. No beach or harbor access for owners. Unlike many landlocked developments, there is no plan to acquire a nearby parcel to provide beach access for condo owners. Instead, there will be “15” minute (?) ferry transportation to Delnore Wiggins State Park Only condo owners who purchase slips will have access to the harbor. No public access to condos or slips. The development will be gated. 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 3 While it was stated that Southbay Drive will remain public, it seems that the desire to make the development private will inevitably lead to attempts to close Southbay Drive off. There seemed to be some allusion to that possibility by Stock personnel at the meeting. Zoning Currently commercial - 51’ above flood level of 21.5’ or total height of 71.5’? Required for proposed Development: 205’ “zoned height” , 235’ actual height. Even higher with equipment on roof? Stock acquired “the property “ in 2017. However, they seem to be continually acquiring bits and pieces, some as recently as last Fall. Some parcels seem to be co-owned. Interestingly, a sign on the parcel where 200 -300 hundred cars are regularly parked briefly listed the parcel for sale for a few million dollars sometime around 2008- 2010. Too bad Collier County did not acquire it for another parking garage. Construction will occur in stages and is dependent on sales results so it could go on for years. Stock’s attempts to address various traffic issues Traffic backing up on Vanderbilt Beach Road at Hammock Oak Dr going West from 41 or going east from the beach. Stock personnel refused to discuss or acknowledge the issue despite repeated requests and descriptions of backups lasting several lights. They tried to assert that the only traffic issues were by the beach and parking garage. Traffic backing up near Vanderbilt Beach. Stock’s analysis/solutions were superficial or mere hyperbole. They blamed inefficiencies with the management of the garage. Stock proposed that parking kiosks be installed like the ones used at Clam Pass Park and by the City of Naples. This would eliminate the backlog caused by the parking lot attendant. They also blamed the current policy of keeping the garage closed for at least 20 minutes and until at least several spaces opened up. They proposed that an app be used and signs installed to alert users that the garage is full. Basically, they want to tell people to “go away”. When asked where beach goers are suppose to go, they said Delnore Wiggins State Park and “other” county beaches. Delnore Wiggins already suffers serious backup and capacity issues as does Clam Pass park three miles south off Seagate and Barefoot Beach, a half hour to the north off the severely congested Bonita Beach Road. They also asserted that pedestrians were a major cause of congestion and that better signage and street markings would help solve the traffic problem.......really? They also stated that under the the County’s method of measuring traffic there is no traffic problem resulting from the project. Inexplicable. The proposals to alleviate inept parking procedures and pedestrian interference ignore the basic problem which is too much traffic and too few parking spots. The project will remove 20 onstreet parking spots and hundreds of parking spaces currently available on the fields proposed to be developed. Using a bathtub as an analogy....the bathtub is full. Their proposals merely fill it faster or organizes the rubber ducks in the tub, but once it is full, it will overflow and make a mess. Also the project actually results in a smaller bath tub! “Could be Worse” argument . An aspect of the presentation which seemed confused was the claim that the current commercial zoning would permit much worse traffic because of the additional hypothetical traffic from a make believe mall. The Mercato was held out as a possibility which seemed silly. A strip mall is the likely type of commercial development for such a modest sized odd-shaped parcel. There is no actual mall because developers have concluded for whatever reason that it is not commercially feasible. Residents in the area would no doubt embrace access to more commercial services so they didn’t have to battle the traffic to the shopping centers on 41 and beyond. In fact, they probably 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4 relied on the commercial designation with the expectation that additional services would some day be available. If anything, a small local mall could help alleviate the traffic problems by reducing trips up to 41 and beyond. The assertion that a gas station could be built was immediately retracted. In any event, one would hope that environmental regulations would prohibit such a facility. Sent from my iPhone. Pls forgive typos. (:-) 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:StrainMark Sent:Tuesday, March 3, 2020 2:46 PM To:SaboJames Subject:FW: One Naples Please process as typical Mark Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: richroni gallagher <randrgall@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2020 7:21 PM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Stock Development has submitted proposals and plans to Collier County seeking to build One Naples across from Vanderbilt Beach in Naples. The scale of the project has created much “buzz” in the community and I wanted to share my concerns. Traffic There is no need for expansive traffic studies. Any local resident or visitor to Vanderbilt has experienced the congestion at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive. That corner is perilous for pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles alike. Gulf Shore Drive is bookended by two traffic “choke points”: The aforementioned intersection at the entry to Vanderbilt Beach to the south and the entry to Delnor-Wiggins State Park to the north. Residents along Gulf Shore Drive have no other options. Each of these intersections get backed up from the beach traffic and pose significant challenges to those residents when accessing or departing their homes. Local residents have all observed emergency response vehicles snarled in the beach traffic at this location. As our dedicated police, fire and medical professionals attest, every second counts when responding to an emergency. Hence, for the reasons cited above, I plead the Collier County Planning Commissioners and County Commissioners to refrain from affording the developers of One Naples any variances, re-zoning or amendments that would allow them to add a single vehicle above and beyond what they can presently develop as of right. Beach Congestion 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 County Commissioners have previously acknowledged the congestion on Vanderbilt Beach. Residents and visitors struggle to find an available patch of sand to place their towels or chairs- never mind umbrellas. The consideration of the parking garage at Clam Pass and remarks from the Commissioners at those hearings to find appropriate solutions to ameliorate beach overcrowding are evidence of their recognition of the problem. Hence, I plead the Collier County Planning Commissioners and County Commissioners to refrain from affording the developers of One Naples any variances, re-zoning or amendments that would allow them to add a single residence above and beyond what they can presently develop as of right. Coastal Hazard Zone The One Naples development is only feet away from Vanderbilt Beach and clearly in the Coastal Hazard Zone. The fear and chaos we experienced with Hurricane Irma are still fresh and raw. Hence, I plead the Collier County Planning Commissioners and County Commissioners to refrain from affording the developers of One Naples any variances, re-zoning or amendments that would allow them to place a single family into the coastal hazard zone above and beyond what they can presently develop as of right. Scale/ Setbacks There has been much discourse about the appropriateness of the proposed height of the development. The plans submitted by Stock depict (2) 18 story towers. Yes, there are similar tall Towers in Collier County and along the shore. However, in no cases are those existing towers positioned anywhere near the property line and in close proximity to a public street and sidewalk. In fact, Stock’s submission clearly shows portions of their towers are setback a mere ten feet from the property line along Vanderbilt Beach Road. A building soaring 180-200 feet high with only a 10’ setback is oppressive. The resulting street wall is unprecedented in Naples and more conducive to the concrete canyons of Manhattan- not Collier County. Hence, I plead the Collier County Planning Commissioners and County Commissioners to refrain from affording the developers of One Naples any variances, re-zoning or amendments that would allow them to position a tower any taller and any closer to the property line they can presently develop as of right. Environmental The adjoining Turkey Bay is a beautiful waterway with abundant sea life and wildlife. Our natural habitats are Collier County’s greatest assets and yet a very delicate and vulnerable one. Hence, I plead the Collier County Planning Commissioners and County Commissioners to refrain from affording the developers of One Naples any variances, re-zoning or amendments that would allow them to create a marina with a single boat slip above and beyond what they can presently develop as of right. I have no objections to Stock developing the parcel they have assembled and would actually welcome them building a complex consistent with existing Collier County zoning regulations and Growth Management Plan. The “let me build what I want or else” rhetoric heard from Stock recently is unproductive and alienating- not to mention idle threats. I’m 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 3 sure there is no need to remind our Collier County Planning Commissioners of your oath of office and I hope you conduct yourselves in this matter to protect and serve your constituents. Thank you very much. 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Guy Kellam <gkellam@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, March 4, 2020 1:33 AM To:SaboJames; GoodnerAngela; info@stockdevelopment.com; SolisAndy; NPAA4U@gmail.com Cc:TaylorPenny; FialaDonna; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; R. Kellam Subject:One Naples Debacle EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Simple premise.... Stock cobbled together the property around Vanderbilt beach, knowing the current C-3 zoning, with the realization that it was a non-starter by their own admission, with the expectation that they could bulldoze their legacy on that little corner. One Naples project advances; neighborhood meeting planned https://www.naplesnews.com/story/money/business/local/2020/03/02/one-naples-moving-ahead-neighborhood- meeting-planned-tuesday/4928571002/ "His team, he said, hasn't even attempted to draw up plans for a purely, or mostly commercial project." Stock claims to want the best for Naples, but their overreaching plan is certainly not in the best interests of Collier County, including Naples Park and Vanderbilt beach, which I have been a part of for over 20 years. Trying to shoe horn this project into a 5.4 acre site is a nightmare for neighbors like us, including density (44 units vs 16 per acre), building height (235 ft vs 70), marina access, public parking, traffic, emergency response, beach access, environmental impact, set backs (starting at 10ft to 0), coastal high hazards, traffic bypass and quality of life. In the end, all we have are commissioners *like you* who are willing to do the right thing, to protect folks like us who have worked their whole life to experience something as wondrous as this (and to pass on to our children). To this end, I simply ask that you enforce the current zoning or make a case that changing it would benefit the larger community and not someone else's pocket/legacy. And yes, I went to the recent NIM @ St. John the Evangelist Catholic Church(3/2/2020), where Stock's presentation focused on fluff, landscaping and parking garage tech, which seemed more akin to a Real Estate Sales pitch, which the folks in the room weren't buying. And yes, tech won't magically expand the current garage capacity and only annoy those who decide to rip through my Naples Park neighborhood. Regardless of the traffic, folks still need a place to park when the garage is full and a place to rest themselves on the ever restricted public beach (thanks to neighbors like the Ritz) :) In a nutshell, one needs to simply "Support Responsible Development", which seems like a reach here.... Thoughts? 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) To Mr. James Sabo, Principle Planner, Collier County Planning Commission From: Naples Park Area Association: President: D. Hunter BOD: N. Royal, M. Oenick, B. Chapman, S. Grace, F. Lombard, M. Lucanegro, F. Murrin, D, Privitera, M. Straight, J. Myers, J. Rohleder https://naplesparkareaassociation.org email: NPAA4U@gmail.com RE: OneNaples PL20190000697 and PL20190000696 We are sending this letter to express the concerns of the membership of the Naples Park Area Association (NPAA) regarding the proposed OneNaples development across from the Vanderbilt Beach County Park. (app #PL20190000697) as well as the Small-Sale Amendment to the Collier County Future Land Use Element (SSAFLUE), [PL20190000696-Exhibit IV.B.1] We appreciate all the County has done and is doing to make Vanderbilt Beach and other County beaches attractive and accessible destinations for County residents and visitors alike. We appreciate the transparency of the planning process and our ability to participate in that process. We believe the current land management plan is sound and current zoning regulations provide for development that fits the property and protects our County’s environment. At the January 2020 regular meeting of the NPAA, the members outlined the following issues and concerns for the ONENAPLES proposal: ● Project demands multiple variances to current County requirements for: o Building height o Buffer zone/set-back o Various landscaping/green space requirements o Sidewalk/bike-lane/pathway requirements for setback ● Project is inconsistent with allowed residential density (2.5 times the current requirements). That density will be coupled with additional daily density and traffic of the proposed hotel and commercial space. ● Lack of adherence to current zoning setback requirement will further complicate safe and reliable Vanderbilt Beach access for bikes, and pedestrians ● Lack of ability to widen Vanderbilt Beach Road or Gulf shore drive will further complicate the traffic flow from US 41 to Vanderbilt Beach County Park ● Lack of ability to widen Vanderbilt Beach Road and current planned egress from the OneNaples property will promote more congestion getting to the parking garage and to Vanderbilt Beach Road. As traffic builds the cut through of traffic to the lights at 91st and 99th Ave will increase and impact safe travel for pedestrians and bikes and children going to the elementary school. ● Increase in traffic and lack of access to the beach will impact the attractiveness of Collier County as a tourist destination. ● Increased water traffic and proposed boat slips will negatively impact the environmental of Vanderbilt Lagoon We ask that the County deny the Small-Sale Amendment to the Collier County future land use element (SSAFLUE) [PL20190000696- Exhibit IV.B.1. Approval of that amendment will change FLUE to meet this specific Developer’s needs and set a precedent for future overly dense developments. We realize Stock has a right to develop the parcel they have assembled. We are supportive of a development that complies to all current (2019-2020) county and local growth management policies, zoning and regulations (i.e. no variances). We appreciate that the review process the County uses to assess new development and ensure healthy growth that will preserve the beauty of the County for County residents and visitors. Be assured we will remain involved in all parts of the process to which the public can participate. Respectfully Submitted, Maureen Straight, Board Member [Civic Committee] for the BOD and Membership of NPAA Please attach this letter to application: PL20190000697 and PL20190000696 Cc: Commissioner; A. Solis 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 408Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 409Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 410Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 411Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 412Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 413Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 414Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 415Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 416Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 417Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 418Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 419Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 420Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 421Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 422Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 423Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 424Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 425Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 426Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 427Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 428Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 429Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 430Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 431Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 432Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 433Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 434Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 435Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 436Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 437Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 438Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 439Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 440Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 441Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 442Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 443Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 444Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 445Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 446Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 447Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.kPacket Pg. 448Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:maureen trerice <emtrerice@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, March 10, 2020 5:00 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Re: One Naples documents EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. Sabo, Thank you for your kind help in working my way through the “system”. It was gratefully appreciated. I loved the fact that the sign off for the road study was January, just before the real influx of tourists and residents, as they descend to the small Vanderbilt Beach Park. I can’t figure out why the Ritz hasn’t entered the discussion, their prestigious Hotel will be vying for even more traffic lanes in season, as it currently does with the adjacent high rise parking lot. This project is a terrible idea and I haven’t even got to the Marina side of the picture. Yikes. 77 to 100 boat docks. Have you seen that little lagoon? Alright, you get it. Too much on Too Little, and more changes to previously decided documents, that Others developed their property upon. Shame Shame Maureen Trerice On Mar 9, 2020, at 2:02 PM, SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Ms. Trerice, I attached the link to the plan documents for the One Naples project. Click on the link, enter the encryption code and click go, then in the blank box enter this number PL20190000697 and click go, then click on “documents and images” You will have access to all the same documents I am using to review. Feel free to contact me with any questions. Link here: http://cvportal.colliergov.net/CityViewWeb/Planning/Locator Respectfully, C. James Sabo, AICP Principal Planner <image003.jpg> 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 Zoning Division James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2708 “Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey athttps://goo.gl/eXjvqT.” Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:StrainMark Sent:Tuesday, March 10, 2020 8:21 AM To:SaboJames Subject:FW: Opposition to One Naples Mark Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Cathy Wilcox <cathywilcox12@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2020 9:37 PM To: HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; PDearborn@colliergov.net; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; ChrzanowskiStan <Stan.Chrzanowski@colliercountyfl.gov>; EdwinFryer@collliergov.net; SchmittJoseph <Joseph.Schmitt@colliercountyfl.gov>; Eastmath@colliergov.net; Karl.Fry@colliergov.net Subject: Opposition to One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. This is Rex Wilcox. I am a resident of Florida and live at Regatta. I am opposed to the One Naples project development on Vanderbilt Beach Road for the following reasons: Unreasonable density increase from 16 units/acre to 44 units/acre or a 275% increase in density Adding a substantial amount of traffic to an already congested area. There are already 3 parking garages within 1/4 mile already to handle beach goers, Ritz‐Carlton employees and Ritz‐Carlton guests. Vanderbilt Beach is already crowded. No one who pays 1.5 million dollars to 10 million dollars is going to wait for a water taxi to take them up the road to Wiggins Pass! They are going to expect/want to walk across the road to the beach right in front of them! Extreme height difference compared to existing buildings north of Vanderbilt Beach Road. 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 Complete rewrite of zoning regulations based on One Naples plans - not what the area residents want or need. Major reduction of green space from current code requirements to add more units. One Naples plan does not compliment the community, the required rezoning is a major increase in density to maximize Stocks' profit. Please help the community by using your input to develop a reasonable plan! Thank you, Rex Wilcox Regatta 712.870.0320 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:maureen trerice <emtrerice@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, March 10, 2020 5:00 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Re: One Naples documents EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. Sabo, Thank you for your kind help in working my way through the “system”. It was gratefully appreciated. I loved the fact that the sign off for the road study was January, just before the real influx of tourists and residents, as they descend to the small Vanderbilt Beach Park. I can’t figure out why the Ritz hasn’t entered the discussion, their prestigious Hotel will be vying for even more traffic lanes in season, as it currently does with the adjacent high rise parking lot. This project is a terrible idea and I haven’t even got to the Marina side of the picture. Yikes. 77 to 100 boat docks. Have you seen that little lagoon? Alright, you get it. Too much on Too Little, and more changes to previously decided documents, that Others developed their property upon. Shame Shame Maureen Trerice On Mar 9, 2020, at 2:02 PM, SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Ms. Trerice, I attached the link to the plan documents for the One Naples project. Click on the link, enter the encryption code and click go, then in the blank box enter this number PL20190000697 and click go, then click on “documents and images” You will have access to all the same documents I am using to review. Feel free to contact me with any questions. Link here: http://cvportal.colliergov.net/CityViewWeb/Planning/Locator Respectfully, C. James Sabo, AICP Principal Planner <image003.jpg> 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 Zoning Division James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2708 “Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey athttps://goo.gl/eXjvqT.” Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:StrainMark Sent:Tuesday, March 10, 2020 8:21 AM To:SaboJames Subject:FW: Opposition to One Naples Mark Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Cathy Wilcox <cathywilcox12@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2020 9:37 PM To: HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; PDearborn@colliergov.net; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; ChrzanowskiStan <Stan.Chrzanowski@colliercountyfl.gov>; EdwinFryer@collliergov.net; SchmittJoseph <Joseph.Schmitt@colliercountyfl.gov>; Eastmath@colliergov.net; Karl.Fry@colliergov.net Subject: Opposition to One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. This is Rex Wilcox. I am a resident of Florida and live at Regatta. I am opposed to the One Naples project development on Vanderbilt Beach Road for the following reasons: Unreasonable density increase from 16 units/acre to 44 units/acre or a 275% increase in density Adding a substantial amount of traffic to an already congested area. There are already 3 parking garages within 1/4 mile already to handle beach goers, Ritz-Carlton employees and Ritz-Carlton guests. Vanderbilt Beach is already crowded. No one who pays 1.5 million dollars to 10 million dollars is going to wait for a water taxi to take them up the road to Wiggins Pass! They are going to expect/want to walk across the road to the beach right in front of them! Extreme height difference compared to existing buildings north of Vanderbilt Beach Road. 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 Complete rewrite of zoning regulations based on One Naples plans - not what the area residents want or need. Major reduction of green space from current code requirements to add more units. One Naples plan does not compliment the community, the required rezoning is a major increase in density to maximize Stocks' profit. Please help the community by using your input to develop a reasonable plan! Thank you, Rex Wilcox Regatta 712.870.0320 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:StrainMark Sent:Wednesday, March 11, 2020 8:43 AM To:SaboJames Subject:FW: Vanderbilt neighborhood Mark Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Mary Dalphon <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 9:30 PM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner Fiala: As a Collier County Commissioner, I believe that you have a responsibility do what’s right for the entire County. While you do not directly represent Vanderbilt Beach Road location of Stock Development’s One Naples proposed project, I hope that you will be listening to the growing level of concern that the area’s residents have about the project. As currently proposed, this development will almost completely fill its 5.4 2 acre site with three seven story buildings and two massive 18-story residential towers. The proposal asks for a staggering density of more than 44 units per acre. This is in a neighborhood that already has zoning in place providing for a maximum residential density of 16 units per acre! I want you to know that many of my neighbors and I are dead set against this development at anywhere near this density and scale. We have set up a web site where you can find out about all of our concerns and see just how serious we are about protecting the Vanderbilt neighborhood we cherish so much. You will find the site at www.savevanderbiltbeach.com. I know that you would want to protect your district if such a development were proposed, and I hope that you will see fit to protect us as well. Sincerely, _______________________Mary and George Dalphon___ ----------------------- 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:StrainMark Sent:Wednesday, March 11, 2020 8:43 AM To:SaboJames Subject:FW: Vanderbilt neighborhood Mark Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Mary Dalphon <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 9:30 PM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner Fiala: As a Collier County Commissioner, I believe that you have a responsibility do what’s right for the entire County. While you do not directly represent Vanderbilt Beach Road location of Stock Development’s One Naples proposed project, I hope that you will be listening to the growing level of concern that the area’s residents have about the project. As currently proposed, this development will almost completely fill its 5.42 acre site with three seven story buildings and two massive 18‐story residential towers. The proposal asks for a staggering density of more than 44 units per acre. This is in a neighborhood that already has zoning in place providing for a maximum residential density of 16 units per acre! I want you to know that many of my neighbors and I are dead set against this development at anywhere near this density and scale. We have set up a web site where you can find out about all of our concerns and see just how serious we are about protecting the Vanderbilt neighborhood we cherish so much. You will find the site at www.savevanderbiltbeach.com. I know that you would want to protect your district if such a development were proposed, and I hope that you will see fit to protect us as well. Sincerely, _______________________Mary and George Dalphon___ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:StrainMark Sent:Thursday, March 12, 2020 3:44 AM To:SaboJames Subject:FW: Please DO NOT APPROVE One Naples Mark Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Laughlin, John <JLaughlin@rgare.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 11:52 AM To: HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; PatrickDearborn@colliergov.net; Karl.Fry@colliergov.net; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; ChrzanowskiStan <Stan.Chrzanowski@colliercountyfl.gov>; SchmittJoseph <Joseph.Schmitt@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Please DO NOT APPROVE One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner, I have owned a residence in the Regatta and resided part time in Vanderbilt Beach for over 20 years. I have reviewed the proposal for One Naples and believe there are several unrealistic aspects: Density, Setback and Traffic. I believe it would be totally irresponsible for us to consider this development as proposed. It would not fit within the Vanderbilt size, feel or character. The size, setback and traffic caused would be detrimental to our community. I would be supportive of something much less dense (24 per acre instead of 44). Thank you for your consideration and leadership. John John P. Laughlin Executive Vice President RGA Reinsurance Company 16600 Swingley Ridge Road Chesterfield MO, 63017 (636) 736-7551 jlaughlin@rgare.com 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:StrainMark Sent:Thursday, March 12, 2020 3:44 AM To:SaboJames Subject:FW: Please DO NOT APPROVE One Naples Mark Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Laughlin, John <JLaughlin@rgare.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 11:52 AM To: HomiakKaren <Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; PatrickDearborn@colliergov.net; Karl.Fry@colliergov.net; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; ChrzanowskiStan <Stan.Chrzanowski@colliercountyfl.gov>; SchmittJoseph <Joseph.Schmitt@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Please DO NOT APPROVE One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner, I have owned a residence in the Regatta and resided part time in Vanderbilt Beach for over 20 years. I have reviewed the proposal for One Naples and believe there are several unrealistic aspects: Density, Setback and Traffic. I believe it would be totally irresponsible for us to consider this development as proposed. It would not fit within the Vanderbilt size, feel or character. The size, setback and traffic caused would be detrimental to our community. I would be supportive of something much less dense (24 per acre instead of 44). Thank you for your consideration and leadership. John John P. Laughlin Executive Vice President RGA Reinsurance Company 16600 Swingley Ridge Road Chesterfield MO, 63017 (636) 736‐7551 jlaughlin@rgare.com 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:tracy johnson <johnsontr272@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, March 14, 2020 5:58 PM To:SaboJames Subject:One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Sir: Please consider asking the developer to widen the sidewalk and adding a bike path on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road. (Adjacent to the One Naples project)We all support the Blue Zone initiative and it would relieve congestion . I talked to Stock representatives and they said they would consider that. Thank you for representing us. TR Johnson 539 93rd Ave n johnsontr272@gmail.com Sent from my iPad 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:Stromberg, Clifford D. <clifford.stromberg@hoganlovells.com> Sent:Monday, March 16, 2020 10:36 AM To:TaylorPenny; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill Cc:SaboJames; SchmidtCorby Subject:Stock Project--Vanderbilt Beach EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Ladies/Gentlemen: I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed Stock development project on Vanderbilt Beach/Gulf Shore Road. I understand the importance of development in the County, and the dynamic that folks often oppose development near them. I live at the Trieste in Bay Colony and the impact on our neighborhood would be massively negative, but that is not the main point. So I’ll try to refer to somewhat objective criteria. 1. First, while any project may increase traffic marginally, this is one of the most extreme traffic impacts I’ve ever seen. As you know, Vanderbilt Beach is accessed essentially by one road. I understand that the projections are that daily traffic would increase by about 400%. That is not a marginal change—it is a total destruction of the tone of the neighborhood. Our building looks right out on Vanderbilt Beach Road. We already hear a good bit of traffic. But this would be nonstop and terrible. Also, backups would likely shunt more traffic onto Pelican Bay, which would degrade the environment for thousands of people. There are also lots of bikers on Gulf Shore( I am one so I see it often) and on Pelican Bay, and that would increase risks to bikers. 2. The size of the proposed 18 story towers is too large. I am not even referring to blocking views—there are no similar sized buildings on the waterfront. Even the Ritz Carlton is lower. But the density entailed by an 18 story tower with something like 400 units, would simply ruin the neighborhood’s relaxed, beach feel. I also heard at the recent hearing that there might be commercial/retail/restaurant development as part of the site. That would just exacerbate the traffic problem! 3. In addition, this will pour added large numbers of people onto Vanderbilt Beach—which is already very crowded most times. The parking lot near the beach is almost always full, and a police officer needs to direct traffic to avoid accidents. But adding hundreds and hundreds of added residents and guests will overwhelm this lovely public beach, and block it for residents inland. 4. We were told that Stock might consider reducing the size/footprint a bit—but that is at best a tactical compromise that does not address the gross traffic problem. Even a 200% or 100% increase in traffic is very unusual and not right for this residential area. 5. We were also told by Stock that we should welcome this project because absent it, some other developer would “create a much worse project.” That kind of scare tactic is transparent and should be disregarded. 6. As you know, there is plenty of developable land in the County, and several projects up North of Vanderbilt Beach. In that far less trafficked and dense area, such a project might make sense—but it does not here. For those of you who are on the planning staff, I would appeal to your professional standards and judgment: this project is too big and dense-- and would be in a largely “landlocked’ site. 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 For those of you who are elected officials, I would say that of course we hope and expect that you will do “the right thing” as you judge it. But also, please be aware that many of us rarely pay attention to local issues, but we are paying attention to this. Our community will simply not vote in the future for people who believe this kind of ill-located development should be our future. It is a defining political issue—full stop. Thank you for considering my views. Clifford D. Stromberg Partner Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004-1109 Tel: +1 202 637 5600 Direct: +1 202 637 5699 Fax: +1 202 637 5910 Email: clifford.stromberg@hoganlovells.com www.hoganlovells.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Follow Hogan Lovells Life Sciences and Health Care for the latest industry news and updates: About Hogan Lovells Hogan Lovells is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP. For more information, see www.hoganlovells.com. CONFIDENTIALITY. This email and any attachments are confidential, except where the email states it can be disclosed; it may also be privileged. If received in error, please do not disclose the contents to anyone, but notify the sender by return email and delete this email (and any attachments) from your system. 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Stromberg, Clifford D. <clifford.stromberg@hoganlovells.com> Sent:Monday, March 16, 2020 10:36 AM To:TaylorPenny; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill Cc:SaboJames; SchmidtCorby Subject:Stock Project--Vanderbilt Beach EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Ladies/Gentlemen: I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed Stock development project on Vanderbilt Beach/Gulf Shore Road. I understand the importance of development in the County, and the dynamic that folks often oppose development near them. I live at the Trieste in Bay Colony and the impact on our neighborhood would be massively negative, but that is not the main point. So I’ll try to refer to somewhat objective criteria. 1. First, while any project may increase traffic marginally, this is one of the most extreme traffic impacts I’ve ever seen. As you know, Vanderbilt Beach is accessed essentially by one road. I understand that the projections are that daily traffic would increase by about 400%. That is not a marginal change—it is a total destruction of the tone of the neighborhood. Our building looks right out on Vanderbilt Beach Road. We already hear a good bit of traffic. But this would be nonstop and terrible. Also, backups would likely shunt more traffic onto Pelican Bay, which would degrade the environment for thousands of people. There are also lots of bikers on Gulf Shore( I am one so I see it often) and on Pelican Bay, and that would increase risks to bikers. 2. The size of the proposed 18 story towers is too large. I am not even referring to blocking views—there are no similar sized buildings on the waterfront. Even the Ritz Carlton is lower. But the density entailed by an 18 story tower with something like 400 units, would simply ruin the neighborhood’s relaxed, beach feel. I also heard at the recent hearing that there might be commercial/retail/restaurant development as part of the site. That would just exacerbate the traffic problem! 3. In addition, this will pour added large numbers of people onto Vanderbilt Beach—which is already very crowded most times. The parking lot near the beach is almost always full, and a police officer needs to direct traffic to avoid accidents. But adding hundreds and hundreds of added residents and guests will overwhelm this lovely public beach, and block it for residents inland. 4. We were told that Stock might consider reducing the size/footprint a bit—but that is at best a tactical compromise that does not address the gross traffic problem. Even a 200% or 100% increase in traffic is very unusual and not right for this residential area. 5. We were also told by Stock that we should welcome this project because absent it, some other developer would “create a much worse project.” That kind of scare tactic is transparent and should be disregarded. 6. As you know, there is plenty of developable land in the County, and several projects up North of Vanderbilt Beach. In that far less trafficked and dense area, such a project might make sense—but it does not here. For those of you who are on the planning staff, I would appeal to your professional standards and judgment: this project is too big and dense-- and would be in a largely “landlocked’ site. 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 For those of you who are elected officials, I would say that of course we hope and expect that you will do “the right thing” as you judge it. But also, please be aware that many of us rarely pay attention to local issues, but we are paying attention to this. Our community will simply not vote in the future for people who believe this kind of ill-located development should be our future. It is a defining political issue—full stop. Thank you for considering my views. Clifford D. Stromberg Partner Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004-1109 Tel: +1 202 637 5600 Direct: +1 202 637 5699 Fax: +1 202 637 5910 Email: clifford.stromberg@hoganlovells.com www.hoganlovells.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Follow Hogan Lovells Life Sciences and Health Care for the latest industry news and updates: About Hogan Lovells Hogan Lovells is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP. For more information, see www.hoganlovells.com. CONFIDENTIALITY. This email and any attachments are confidential, except where the email states it can be disclosed; it may also be privileged. If received in error, please do not disclose the contents to anyone, but notify the sender by return email and delete this email (and any attachments) from your system. 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: March 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:SaboJames Sent:Wednesday, April 1, 2020 3:07 PM To:BellowsRay; elwaldron@aol.com Cc:SawyerMichael Subject:RE: ONE Naples Hi Evelyn, Thank you for the email. As Ray mentioned, we cannot prevent a property owner from applying for a project. They are entitled to apply and “ask” to develop their site. However, the County has a detailed and thorough review process to ensure that projects that are proposed meet the Land Development Code standards. For this project, the property owner (Stock) has met with residents in the area and attempted to design their project to address neighborhood concerns. At this time, they are in the 2nd stage of review and they have amended their plan to address concerns. It does not mean that neighbors will agree with the proposed project, but the owner has reached out. They have adjusted their project design and we are currently reviewing the revised proposal. Please contact me and would be glad to answer questions. Be safe. Respectfully, C. James Sabo, AICP Principal Planner Zoning Division James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2708 “Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT.” Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 1:57 PM To: elwaldron@aol.com Cc: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov>; SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: ONE Naples Hi James and Mike, Please assist Evelyn with her questions and concerns noted below. Thanks 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT. From: elwaldron@aol.com <elwaldron@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2020 1:51 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: ONE Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you for your email. I would very much like to know what will be done to alleviate traffic issues caused by such a massive project. Evelyn Waldron In a message dated 4/1/2020 1:31:47 PM Eastern Standard Time, Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov writes: Good afternoon, Even though Collier County doesn’t have the ability to prohibit a property owner from submitting a rezone application, the proposed development will be reviewed by professional engineers, land use planners, environmentalists, urban designers, transportation planners, fire review professionals, and the utilities staff along with other review staff to ensure that this proposed project complies with all the applicable codes and regulations. As you may know, the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) contains requirements for the applicant to hold a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) as a way to start the process of communicating with local residents. Our review team on this project want to hear from local residents so we can get a better understanding of the community concerns. I have forwarded your comment and concerns to James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner as he is the project manager for this rezone application. He will be glad to set up a conference call with Mike Sawyer in Transportation Planning so they can explain the transportation impacts of this project and any proposed mitigation by the developer. 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 3 Please let me or James Sabo know if you have other comments or concerns and we will be glad to assist. Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT. From: elwaldron@aol.com <elwaldron@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2020 12:47 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: ONE Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I am a resident of North Naples (Bay Colony) and can't imagine what our government (including you) is thinking by considering such a project as ONE Naples! How do you plan to alleviate the traffic problems this project would cause?? Please vote NO for this project. Evelyn Waldron 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) From: Michael Elleman <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2020 9:56 AM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner Strain: My wife and I are full-time residents of the Regatta and we strongly object to a change to the zoning that Stock Development is seeking. We are on the 5th floor, and purchased this unit a couple of years ago because of the unencumbered water views it has. We also paid a premium price because of those views. If the proposed towers get built, they will completely block our view of the gulf, and the value of our property will plummet. It could be financially devastating to us. Not to mention the additional traffic will reduce property values throughout the area. In season, we already have trouble taking a left out of our complex because of the high level of traffic. Please don’t let this happen. We appreciate your support. Thank you, Mike and Ellen Elleman 400 Flagship Drive #502 Naples, FL 34108 Michael K. Elleman c) 239-298-4220 mkelleman1@gmail.com ----------------------- 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:ShawinskyPeter Sent:Monday, April 6, 2020 1:10 PM To:SaboJames Subject:FW: Vanderbilt neighborhood James, FYI. Please see email below from the One Naples Group. Also I am working from home and checking emails. Stay safe and healthy! Respectfully, Peter Shawinsky, R.A. Architect Development Review Division Exceeding Expectations, Every Day! NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.8523 How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! Disclaimer- this email is not to be interpreted as an endorsement or approval of any permit, plan, project, or deviation from the Land Development Code. -----Original Message----- From: ScottChris <Chris.Scott@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 1:04 PM To: ShawinskyPeter <Peter.Shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Vanderbilt neighborhood Please forward to the planner for the PUD. Christopher O. Scott, AICP, LEED-AP Planning Manager - Development Review 239.252.2460 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! -----Original Message----- From: ShawinskyPeter <Peter.Shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2020 12:41 PM To: ScottChris <Chris.Scott@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Vanderbilt neighborhood Chris, FYI. See email below. Respectfully, Peter Shawinsky, R.A. Architect Development Review Division Exceeding Expectations, Every Day! NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.8523 How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! Disclaimer- this email is not to be interpreted as an endorsement or approval of any permit, plan, project, or deviation from the Land Development Code. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Elleman <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 10:02 AM To: ShawinskyPeter <Peter.Shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. Shawinsky, 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 3 I am writing you in your capacity as architect working on the One Naples development. In reading your comments in the Hole Montes letter of March 4, you have certainly hit on the crux of the matter. THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION FOR THE “HIGH RISE DESIGN ELEMENTS” OR THEIR IMPACT ON THE “SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND THE NEIGHBORING LOW-RISE BUILDINGS.” Thanks for your good work on this matter. __________________________ ---------------------- ________________________________ Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) April 26, 2020 Robert Pritt, Esq. Roetzel and Andress 850 Park Shore Drive Naples, FL 34103 Re: Opinion Letter _ The Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Small Scale Map Amendment (PL2019-0000696), The One Naples Planned Unit Development Zoning (PL20190000697) and the Petition for Gulf Shore Court Vacation (PL20200000368) Dear Robert: Pursuant to your request, I am taking this opportunity to present my professional land use planning opinion regarding the One Naples Small Scale Map Amendment and Mixed-use Planned Development Zoning (the One Naples project). The opinion focuses on: 1.Whether or not the map amendment is internally consistent with the Collier County Plan; 2.Whether the map amendment complies with Florida’s Community Planning Act 163.3177(6) planning analysis, 163.3177(2) internal inconsistencies and 163.3187(1)(a- b) small scale map amendment; and 3.Whether the companion rezoning is compatible and complimentary to surrounding Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive properties and neighborhoods and thus entitled for additional densities and reduced development standards. Property Location The 5.42 acre site is located at the northwest quadrant of the Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive intersection, Collier County. The subject project site has been assembled, with 48 separate folio numbered parcels. Gulf Shore and Vanderbilt Beach roads are classified two lane arterials. The site’s intersection location is highly prestigious and notable being uniquely sited in both the Gulf Shore Drive and the West Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhoods. The site is characterized as having ocean front and back-bay fronting views and access. The site is designated as a Future Urban Residential Subdistrict located within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). The subject property is currently zoned C-3 and developed with various commercial and residential uses. Page of 1 29 Stuart and Associates Planning & Design Services 239 - 677 - 6126 Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Drive Fort Myers, FL 33907 _ 97 Riverfront Drive Cashmere, WA 988915 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) The Small Scale Map Amendment and Planned Development Zoning Request The property owner, Vanderbilt Naples Holding, LLC (represented by Stock Development) requests the following Future Land Use Map and Element amendment: •A Small Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment, with a companion MPUD Rezone (PUDZ PL201900006967), to allow 172 total units, equal to 31.7 DUS/acre, 10,000 square feet of Retail, Restaurant, Personal Services and Professional Offices commercial uses, an undefined marina facility that is estimated at 55 to 99 slips with up to 4 slips leased to charter vessels, a 1,000 sf ships store and a fuel dock open to the public. The amendment request includes a 15% Open Space development standard which includes roof top open space and the ability to reduce required open space, by in-kind contributions acceptable to the Board of County Commissioners. The site’s Future Urban Residential Subdistrict designation may allow up to 16 DUS/ac., subject to plan and code previsions without a maximum building coverage. Based on RT zoning proximity, the property enjoys a 100-ft maximum height standard and a code standard 1/2 zoned building height setback requirement. The project requests different development standards for different development pods, buildings and water front areas. The One Naples Mixed Use Planned Development rezoning standards are identified on the following page. The development standard table includes current C-3 zoning district standards, along with a percentage standard request change. The One Naples Development Standards and Master Concept Plan The project’s requested Master Concept Plan, its Vanderbilt Beach Road Landscape Plan Exhibit G and its requested development standards compared to existing C-3 zoning are identified on pages 3 and 4. The request’s development standards and MCP are as of 03/27/20. Page of 2 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page of 3 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Introduction To The One Naples Project From a review of the 03/27/20 One Naples project’s Mixed Use Development Performance Standards and Master Concept Plan (see pg. 3 table), project development standards and general observations are as follows: 1.A 198% property density increase, from 87 to 172 total units; 2.A 182% zoning building height increase, from 100-ft to 182-ft.; 3.A 60% + front and side setback reduction, from 1/2 building height to 10 to 25-ft.; 4.From 30% to 15% project open space standard (includes roof top open space); Page of 4 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 5.From min. 25-ft waterfront setback to a zero-ft waterfront setback; 6.The application’s Master Concept Plan and analysis does not include waterfront marina design information and plans for the requested 55 to 99 boat slip private/public marina; the MCP and Application does not take into account any associated marina to project and neighbors uses and user impacts; 7.The application’s MCP and development standards does not include adequate Vanderbilt Beach Rd and Gulf Shore Dr streetscape design standards and marina standards, including pedestrian, service, parking and circulation, landscaping, lighting, signage and other design standards. 8.The application does not provide any Gulf Shore Dr and Vanderbilt Beach Rd pedestrian and streetscape analysis and design standards to ameliorate potential 40-ft tall garage with 15-ft setback impacts. The application does not include any measurable architectural designs for the March 2020 site plan and its four requested buildings; the 525-ft long +/- 87-ft tall waterfront building presents height, mass, bulk and setback issues; 9.The application fails to provide architectural elevations and streetscape cross section plan graphics for the LDC 5.05.08.D.3.c.i. deviation, to not require a “Transitional Massing Element” for the 40-ft tall parking garage podium structure along Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive. The application requests that development standards should be relaxed for the purpose of obtaining flexibility in site redevelopment. The application asks that the project’s development standards should be treated similar in manner to a community redevelopment project (see “all costs are borne by the developer, without the incentives and relaxations typically afforded a CRA” Application Justification pdf pg. 4.) Collier Co. Policy 4.8 delegates all redevelopment plans solely to the County Commission. The BOCC has never designated the site for redevelopment. So this line of argument is specious. The application puts forward its case justification by arguing that the mixed-use planned development and marina will lead to better neighborhood conditions and impacts when compared to existing C-3 zoning. Greg Stuart, MUP_ Opinion Letter Review and Approach Greg Stuart has been qualified as an expert in land use planning, land development and urban design in Collier, Lee and other Florida local governments and circuit court, along with various Washington State local governments, circuit and federal court. A resume is on file with the Collier County Hearing Examiners Office. The following analytical review process underpins this opinion letter: •Site Visit and Neighborhood/Community Windshield Survey; Page of 5 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) •One Naples FLUM Amendment October 2019, January 2020 and March 2020 File Review and Application, including the January 8, 2020 FLUM Language Amendment, the various March 27, 2020 Application Files and revised MCP’s and standards, the Applications Justification Statement and Developer Commitments, Supplemental Design Information, Traffic Impact Statement (01/20 and 03/20); other Application Maps and Graphics, Deviation Justification, and Zoning Application Evaluation Criteria; •The January 20, 2020 HMA Response Letter to Collier Staff , the November 20, 2019 and February 26, 2020 Staff Request For Information, March and POI Zoning Application; •One Naples Adjacent Property Information Ex. C; •County Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Element, Other Elements and Maps; and •Collier County Land Development Code, Marina Codes and Manatee Protection Plan. Florida law requires that comprehensive plan map amendments be “fairly debatable”, in part given the legislative nature of the decision making process. For the purpose of this opinion letter, the fairly debatable determination is predicted on: 1.Whether the map amendment and companion re-zoning can logically be considered complimentary and compatible to the Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road properties and neighborhoods given project densities and building height doubled while reducing development setback and open space standards. 2.Whether the map amendment and mixed-use PD zoning predictably reflects an accurate analysis and understanding of neighborhood context; whether the application provides factual evidence that proves the project is compatible and complimentary to the surrounding neighborhoods. 3.Whether the One Naples Map Amendment will be fair; i.e, will the map amendment grant a unique and special privilege to the applicant that other Gulf Shore Drive owners may or may not enjoy, or that can be used for future Gulf Shore Drive density increase requests? The quasi-judicial zoning process is based on the weighing and acceptance of factual evidence. As evidence this report relies on mapping and analysis with foundational planning practices and principles at the core. This will include an assessment of the application’s Justification Ex. V.D.1 Justification and Supplemental Information page 4 paragraph 4, which is: 1.High quality mixed use development that is complimentary to and compatible with the surrounding development. 2.Creates a desirable mixed use development by bringing related activities closer together. 3.Promotes pedestrian, bicycle and transit utilization. Page of 6 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) The One Naples Planning Study Area Collier County requires adjacent property mapping information for compatibility analysis and findings determination. The Application’s Adjoining Property Information Exhibit C provides a limited surrounding property compatibility analysis. The Application’s limited planning study area leads to skewed neighborhood building heights findings and flawed compatibility findings. Applicant Exhibit C relies on 2 West Vanderbilt Beach Road north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd and 1 oceanfront condominium along the west side of South Gulf Shore Dr. The applicant’s primary planning study area consists of the Pelican Bay’s ocean front high-rise properties south of Vanderbilt Beach. The Application’s positive compatibility findings are reliant on eight Pelican Landing 20 story + high rises, and the north Vanderbilt Beach Road’s the Regatta and the Beachmoor properties. The Application’s Exhibit C compatibility building height information ignores almost completely all Gulf Shore Drive’s ocean front and back-bay fronting properties, along with all of Vanderbilt Beach Road’s predominant 1 and 2 story single-family and low-rise multi- family neighborhood properties. The application’s Exhibit C lacks logical boundaries; it ignores Vanderbilt Beach Road’s functional neighborhood boundary between Pelican Bay/ Bay Colony PUD from conventionally zoned C-3, RT and RMF 16 Gulf Shore and Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhoods. An accurate adjoining property planning study area must include Gulf Shore Drive, both the north and south sides of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Naples Park back bay neighborhoods (see the following page Planning Study Area map Exhibit 1). An accurate analysis will lead to more accurate compatibility findings; i.e. matching building heights, setbacks and densities. The Application’s positive compatibility findings do not rely on an accurate planning study. Page of 7 29 One Naples Adjacent Property Information Exhibit C One Naples Applicant Compatibility Planning Area 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page of 8 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Neighborhood Compatibility Analysis _ Zoning Properties located on the south side of Vanderbilt Beach Road are zoned PUD as part of the Pelican Bay project and Bay Colony neighborhoods. The PUD includes high density ocean front and non-ocean front high-rises, MF medium-low density 2 to 3 story flats and 1 to 2 story single-family homes (small lot, zero lot and attached). Properties located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road and along Gulf Shore Drive have conventional C-3, RT and RMF 16 zoning, with the RSF 3 Seabreeze/Channel/Bayview Ave zoned single-family neighborhood bisecting Gulf Shore Drives ocean front and back bay MF uses. As such, properties and neighborhoods along the north Vanderbilt Beach Road right-of-way are distinct and separate from Pelican Bay. Two planned developments are located adjacent to the One Naples site. They are the 12 story Regatta and Beachmoor condominiums. Low story low density RMF 6 neighborhoods are located east of the site and along Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Based on the conventional zoning districts, properties north of Vanderbilt Beach Road and along Gulf Shore Drive have densities and associated building heights lower than what is found within the Pelican Bay PUD. Hence, the Vanderbilt Beach Road serves as distinct neighborhood density edge. Page of 9 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Neighborhood Compatibility Analysis _ Building Height Within the Pelican Bay PUD there are 6 ocean front properties having 20 to 22 stories (please refer to the following page, Neighborhood Building Height Ex 3). The PUD includes 3 tall, high density non-ocean front high-rises. The application primarily relies on these 9 high-rises for it’s project compatibly findings. It is noted that these examples of application desired building height are not located in the Gulf Shore Drive and West Vanderbilt Road neighborhoods. It is further noted that the application ignores all Pelican Bay SF and MF 1 to 3 story housing neighborhoods for their mapping analysis. The application relies on the 12 story Regatta and Beachmoor projects to support a finding of One Naples height compatibility. The application ignores the fact that properties located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road and along Gulf Shore Drive have a wide variety of building heights, ranging from 1 story to 14 stories, such as the adjoining 5 story Barefoot Pelican Condo and the east located 1 and 2 story Beachwalk neighborhood. Identified on the Building Height Pattern Analysis Exhibit 4, based on a building height sample of 24 properties the South Gulf Shore Drive exhibits an average building height of 6.9 stories. Based on a building height sample of 3 properties the West Vanderbilt Beach Road exhibits an average building height of 10.25 stories. Utilizing a building height sample of 9 properties, the East Vanderbilt Beach Road and Bay Colony neighborhoods exhibit a 1 to 2 story building height average. Relying on a building height sample of 8 properties the Bay Colony Drive ocean front projects neighborhoods exhibit an average 20.8 story building height. The Exhibit 4’s key finding is that the One Naples 208-ft building height is significantly higher than any contextually relevant Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road property. Furthermore, the 208-ft building height is much higher than the three adjacent properties potentially most affected by the One Naples MU-1 building height, including the Regatta, Barefoot Pelican and the Beachmoor. Page of 10 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page of 11 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Building Height Neighborhood Compatibility Findings The One Naples site lies within both the South Gulf Shore Drive and West Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhoods. It’s 2-lane coastal arterial road intersection site grants the project a prestigious location, central to community prominence and importance, with beach oriented streetscapes and back-bay boat access. Vanderbilt Beach Road is the logical and definitive neighborhood boundary, distinguishing Pelican Bay’s PUD higher density/higher building height coastal development, to Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Page of 12 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Shore Drive's conventional RSF 3, RMF-6, RMF-16, RT and C-3 zoned properties with associated lower density and building height (16 units an acre for RMF 16, RT and C-3, other lower densities as specified). These areas are located north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd and have an average property height of 7 stories. Since they are not actually located within the Gulf Shore Drive and West Vanderbilt Road neighborhoods, the use of Pelican Bay building heights as a measure of compatibility should be discounted accordingly. By ignoring almost all of the Gulf Shore Drive ocean front and back-bay fronting properties the application has not adhered to professionally accepted and geographically sound mapping and planning compatibility analysis practices. The application does not distinguish neighborhoods by zoning districts, housing characteristics, street location and density/building heights. The application’s Adjacent Properties Information Map Ex. C is deficient and derived application findings in error. As of March 27, 2020 the map amendment request has not performed the requisite analyses as per 163.3177(6). The One Naples request is for 182-ft zoned height and 208-ft actual height for the MU-1 high-rise pod. For the other two buildings, the project requests 55-ft zoned and 87-ft actual height. The MU-1 height request is 230% + greater than the neighborhood 7 story average building height. The request is a 208% increase over the C-3 zoning100-ft. height standard. The existing C-3 100-ft height and 16 DUS/acre development standard is complimentary with and compatible to the neighborhood’s 7 story height average. The C-3 standards more or less support to-scale development form with the adjacent Regatta. Consistent with the Stuart exhibits 2 through 5, anything over current C-3 standards will lead to a lessening of complimentary and compatible neighborhood character due to inappropriate development standards. The greater the degree of divergent C-3 to One Naples development standards, the greater the probable impacts. It is logical that, since the One Naples project is proposing standards far removed from anything closely resembling C-3, then the project as currently proposed will be equally far removed from being complimentary and compatible to the surrounding neighborhoods. The application has not provided any evidence that the increased building height supports community character compatibility objectives. There is no evidence presented that two 208-ft high rise buildings will create a desirable mixed-use development by bringing related activities closer together. In fact, a strong case can be made that high-rise buildings serve to separate and isolate activities. Finally, no evidence has been presented that tall high-rise buildings at the subject location will promote pedestrian, bicycle and transit utilization. The One Naples map amendment and companion PD zoning requested building height does not meet the standard established in Policy 5.6: •POLICY 5.6 New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. Page of 13 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Community Character Analysis _ The Gulf Shore Dr. & Vanderbilt Bch. Rd. Setbacks and Building Form Referring to the Stuart Setback Exhibit 6, surrounding property setbacks are noted in white font, with the One Naples setbacks identified in yellow font. The setbacks were determined by use of the Collier Co. Property Appraiser GIS program. Not knowing ROW location, the setbacks are measured to public road paved section. Though more accurate source information is needed to secure final measurements, the use of GIS does provide for general description and meaningful, preliminary analysis. Two adjacent Planned Page of 14 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Developments, Beachmoor and Regatta, have front setbacks in line with county code requirements, (1/2 ft for every foot increase over the base height with min. 25-ft front setback). The main Regatta Condominium building is setback from Vanderbilt Beach Rd approximately 180-ft.; the Beachmoor is setback from Gulf Shore Dr by 85-ft. Other Gulf Shore Dr setbacks range from 52-ft to 108-ft. The parking garage opposite the One Naples site is setback approximately 75-ft from Vanderbilt Beach Rd. The Barefoot Pelican condominium has a 40-ft side yard setback to Vanderbilt Beach Rd. The project requests a Vanderbilt Beach Rd and Gulf Shore Dr 15-ft setback for the 40-ft tall parking garage and podium. The project requests a Vanderbilt Beach Rd and Gulf Shore Dr 25-ft setback for the primary 208-ft tall high rise buildings. The project requests a Southbay Drive 10-ft side yard setback for the MU-2 building. The One Naples project requests a zero foot waterfront setback for the MU-3/MU-4 building. These requested setbacks are much less than existing zoning code standards, which are a 1/2 -ft increase for every foot height increase. For the project’s 182-ft high-rises, the front setback should be 91-ft, which is substantially deeper than the proposed 15-ft to 25-ft setbacks. C-3 zoning requires a minimum 25-ft waterfront setback, which is substantially deeper than the requested zero foot building setback. Page of 15 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Community Character Analysis _ One Naples Height, Mass & Bulk Streetscape Impacts Referring to the Stuart Height, Mass and Bulk Community Character Exhibit 7, the two 208- ft MU-1 high-rise buildings setback by 25-ft, combined with a 40-ft tall 15-ft setback accessory residential parking garage/podium setback from Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive, present significant development height and bulk streetscape impacts. It is noted that more accurate site and architectural plan information, including CAD files, are needed in order provide for a more accurate and detailed height, bulk and mass community character impact analysis. However, by interpreting building height and mass by adjoining property scale with information provided by Collier County Property Appraiser, Google Earth and application submittal information, a generally correct building height, bulk and mass community character assessment is obtained and provides for both general description and meaningful preliminary analysis. The applicant’s choice of going forward with a hard-edge coastal resort urban form impacts the community far greater than a more compatible soft-edge coastal resort suburban form. The application’s development standards and density follow a Collins Ave. Miami Beach model. A Collins Ave. model for the subject location is not compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses (see Urban Form examples below). Referring to Stuart Exhibit 8, the One Naples site is located within a suburban coastal area context defined by code-specified setbacks and open spaces. The One Naples application does not acknowledge this fact. Therefore it fails to put forward a compatible and complimentary project that is based on a “soft” edge suburban form. The One Naples design’s development standard underpin too massive, too tall and too bulky MU-1 and MU-3/4 building form. The MU-1 building form does not incorporate ground level pedestrian stores, shops and activities along Gulf Shore and Vanderbilt Beach Road. This fact impacts community character by creating approximately 700 linear feet of a “dead zone”street dominated by a 40-ft tall parking garage/podium structure setback 15-ft. It is more than reasonable to expect negative community character impacts from this 15-ft to 25-ft setback from Gulf Shore and Vanderbilt Beach Road design approach. Page of 16 29 Proposed One Naples Vanberbilt Beach Road Streetscape Plan _ 15-ft. 40-ft. Tall Parking Garage Setback w./No Pedestrian Level Stores/Shops/Activities; Includes An 8-ft. Mulitpath & 7-ft. Wide Landscape Strip @ 4.5 Trees Per 100-LF (19 Palms & 17 Medium Trees) Existing Pedestrian Level Mixed Uses @ 9002 Gulf Shore Drive Generalized Location Of 15-ft. Parking Garage Setback 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page of 17 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) It is more than reasonable to expect that the One Naples high-rise buildings and the 525-ft long MU_3/4 waterfront building with zero setback, will directly and negatively impact neighboring properties, including Barefoot Pelican and Regatta condominiums due to out-of context neighborhood height, bulk and mass impacts. Direct adjoining and adjacent property impacts that can be expected from One Naples will include light and shading, views and vistas, noise and other impacts. Community Character Analysis _ Waterfront Design Impacts Analysis Referring to the Community Character Waterfront Design Impacts Analysis Exhibit 9 the application requests a zero foot back-bay waterfront setback for an 87-ft tall 525-ft long +/- building. A zero foot setback for a tall, monolithic building impacts the visual qualities and community character of the back-bay area. It is noted that most back-bay properties incorporate the minimum 25-ft rear waterbody setback and are not as long and bulky as what is requested. For example, Barefoot Pelican’s longest building is. approximately 260- ft in length. The MU-3/4 building is completely out of context with the surrounding neighborhood; the One Naples MCP and development standards are not compatible with the neighboring residences. It is noted that the tallest back-bay waterfront building for the subject area is the Regatta. Yet, by incorporating a 68-ft to 208-ft setback the Regatta is compatible with the neighborhood. This contrasts to the One Naple’s design approach that does not incorporate meaningful building setbacks. The One Naples water front building (MU-3 & 4) with it’s zero-foot setback, will directly impact Barefoot Pelican Condominium’s and a significant portion of the Regatta’s views and vistas. One Naples will create shadow impacts and other nuisance related impacts due to proximity. The applications two high-rise buildings will create views and vista impacts to the Regatta and to low rise MF and single-family homes along Vanderbilt Drive. Page of 18 29 Barefoot Pelican Min. 25-ft. Waterfront Setback The Regatta Varied Waterfront Setbacks From 68-ft. to 220-ft. +/- Proposed Zero Ft. Waterfront Setback 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Community Compatibility Findings The application has failed to demonstrate how the map amendment and zoning will create a “high quality mixed use development that is complimentary to and compatible with the surrounding development”. Referring to Stuart Exhibits 6, 7, 8 and 9, the One Naples Master Concept Plan and development standards present a “hard-edge” coastal urban resort form, characterized by tall building heights and narrow setbacks on narrow streets. The request is in contrast to the Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhood suburban context, characterized as having a “soft-edge” suburban form with more moderate building heights, and code-compliant setbacks, open spaces and density. The application’s objective to “creates a desirable mixed use development by bringing related activities closer together”, is not supported by the too-narrow setbacks, too-tall buildings, and closed/private resort orientation with no active streetscape/ground level stores, shops and activities. The use of large monolithic structures is contrary to good community character development design. Both the dual street fronting 40-ft tall parking garage and the 525-ft long 87-ft tall waterfront building present negative height, mass and bulk neighborhood compatibility impacts. The project is not compatible and complimentary to its surrounding neighborhoods. When evaluating the map amendment Page of 19 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) and companion planned development zoning request, a professionally accepted approach requires the review to examine the combined influence of doubling allowable densities within a Miami-like coastal resort urban form. It is the interrelationship of increased density with increased building heights, reduced setback standards and reduced open space that create community character and compatibility inconsistency issues. Deviations Findings The application’s deviation request to LDC 5.05.08.D.3.c.i_ •LDC 5.05.08.D.3.c.i., which requires that “Transitional massing elements be no more than 100 percent taller than the average height of adjacent buildings [within 150 feet”, but no more than 30 feet, and no less than ten feet above the existing grade” to instead allow for the parking podium, on MU Tract 1, which functions as a transitional massing element, to be a maximum of 35 feet in height. The application does not provide to-scale building elevations and Gulf Shore/Vanderbilt street cross sections to support professional planning analysis. Therefore the application is deficient in regard to providing proper data and analysis (163.3177(6)). The deviation justification is that the 40-ft parking garage/podium serves as the transitioning device to the 208-ft high rises. Therefore nothing more is needed. The justification ignores important street level views, vistas and perceptions; the deviation disregards the importance of advancing pedestrian streetscape (see C-3 Mixed Use Design Standard 4.02.38). The deviation serves to further turn the project’s back on neighborhood and community character and livability considerations. If approved the deviation will serve to deaden the adjoining streetscapes by creating a monolithic and massive structure with an unwelcoming pedestrian interface devoid of ground level pedestrian activities. The deviation is not consistent with Policy 5.6 ("New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code”) directly because of a lack of neighborhood contextual design and contextually correct development standards. The map amendment and companion rezoning is internally inconsistent with the Collier Plan in violation of 163.3177(2). The C-3 Is Worse Than PD Argument The applicant puts forward a justification that resulting development form and intensity under the existing C-3 will be worse for the neighborhood than what the planned development is proposing. A closer examination of the proposition proves that the assertion is false and without logic. The PD puts forward an essentially private resort with undefined and unidentified mixed uses. C-3 zoning allows business, professional and personal services to the pubic, along with residential as per 4.02.38 Conditional Mixed-Use. Hotels are not permitted and Page of 20 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) restaurants have to be within the principal structure. C-3 offers more public activity and uses benefits. A comparison of C-3 to One Naples development standards demonstrates that it is logically impossible for the project to claim comparable and compatible new development with low impacts equal to, if not better, than the baseline C-3 zoning. One Naples adds 1252 new net average daily vehicle trips, doubles building height and density, reduces and/or eliminates setbacks and does not require 4.02.38 type compliant mixed use urban design standards. C-3 standards are similar to adjacent PD standards and thus are compatible. Existing C-3 zoning standards advance compatibility. The diminishment of C-3 standards will lead to compatibility diminishment. THE C-3 EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMPARED TO ONE NAPLES COMPARISON TABLE Page of 21 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Application Submittals, Sufficiency and Marina Evaluation The project has not fully complied with Application for Public Hearing 10.03.06 B: 15. General location map drawn to scale, illustrating north point and relationship of the site to external facilities such as highways, shopping areas, cultural complexes and the like. •Comment _ no mapping of parking lots and garages, Naples Park, Beachwalk, Gulfshore Drive and other residential neighborhoods; no mapping of public beach access and existing pedestrian ways. 17. Description or narrative of project development, including a description of the relationship of the proposed land uses to each other within the PUD and to land uses abutting/surrounding the project. •Comment _ no public and private interface, uses, users and activities content. 21. The proposed timing for location of, and sequence of phasing, or incremental development within the PUD. •Comment _ Marina and building phasing plan (all in one phase?) 22. The proposed location of all roads and pedestrian systems, with typical cross sections, which will be constructed to serve the PUD and shall be attached as exhibits to the ordinance of adoption. •Comment _No cross sections, no elevations, no marina to public interface plans, no details; the MCP does not identify the location of non-residential 10,000 sf uses. 35. When determined necessary to adequately assess the compatibility of proposed uses to existing or other proposed uses, relationship to open space, recreation facilities, or traffic impacts, or to assess requests for reductions in dimensional standards, the Planning & Zoning Division Director may request schematic architectural drawings (floor plans, elevations). •Comment _ The project is located at the prestigious and unique Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road intersection; with 700 +/- street frontage the application requires cross sections, architectural drawings, etc. The project has not fully complied with PUD Master Plan 10.02.13 A: 5. Identify all proposed and permitted land uses, pursuant to LDC section 2.03.06, within each tract or increment describing: •Percentage of total development represented by each type of use. •Outline of the proposed building footprint (each tract or increment); •Comment _ not adequately provided on MCP Page of 22 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9. Typical cross sections of all major, collector, and local streets, public or private, within the proposed development. •Comment _ Not adequately provided On MCP 10. The location of proposed and existing roads, rights-of-way, and pedestrian systems within 1,500 feet of the proposed development. •Comment _ Detailed Gulf Shore Drive and other pedestrian systems, and marina interface pedestrian systems not adequately provided on MCP The project has not undertaken a 5.05.02 Marina review for an up to 99 slip marina with ships store and fuel docks. The applicant has not provided any marina user, activity and impact information for the requested 55 to 99 wet slip marina facility with fuels pumps and ships store. A 99 slip facility is a large marina; Naples City Docks has 84 slips and Docks On Fifth has 60 slips. Marina accessory use service and user traffic, access and circulation, nuisance related impacts and the like are not identified and assessed. Development design to marina interface site planning considerations and HOA residents users and guests definition issues remain to be assessed. The degree, if any, of non-residential condominium owners renting or owning boat slips may generate external traffic impacts that need to be examined. The applicant has not performed the requisite analyses as per 163.3177(6); Collier County should find the application insufficient. One Naples Collier County Comprehensive Plan Consistency Analysis The map amendment and zoning application is not consistent with various objectives and policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. These internal inconsistencies are prohibited by 163.3177(2). Please see the following One Naples comprehensive plan consistency analysis. OBJECTIVE 3: Ensure protection of natural and historic resources, ensure the availability of land for utility facilities, promote compatible land uses within the airport noise zone, and to provide for management of growth in an efficient and effective manner through Land Development Regulations adopted to implement this Growth Management Plan. •RESPONSE _The PD development standards weaken existing C-3 rules and reduces LDC efficiency and effectiveness. The application Exhibit G Streetscape Landscaping illustrates the applications lack of consistency with Objective 3 in so far as site planning, streetscape design, urban design and buffering. At 792.8-ft and with 36 total Vanderbilt Beach Road trees (19 Palm and 17 Medium Trees) the planting scheme is 4.5 trees per 100 LF. At 274.8-ft and with 12 total Gulf Shore Drive trees (6 Palm and 6 Medium Trees) the planting scheme is 4.5 trees per 100 LF. The 4.5 trees per 100 LF is a minimal standard, and not sufficient to address 208-ft tall high-rises and associated streetscape/pedestrian impacts. The project fails to meet adjoining property and neighborhood compatibility standards. The project fails to meet it’s Page of 23 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) entitlement request criteria under LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5. The project is not consistent with Objective 3 and 3F. F The safe and convenient flow of on-site traffic, as well as the design of vehicle parking areas, are addressed through the site design standards and site development plan requirements of the LDC, which include: access requirements from roadways, parking lot design and orientation, lighting, building design and materials, and landscaping and buffering criteria. •RESPONSE_The MCP design does not provide for safe and convenient on-site traffic as to deficiencies in parking lot design, parking lot orientation, building design and landscaping and buffering (see Stuart Exhibits 7 through 9). OBJECTIVE 5: Implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element. •RESPONSE_The map amendment language and the planned development standards do not ensure compatibility of land uses; the request weakens existing C-3 zoning standards. The project is not consistent with Objective 5 and Policies 5.3 and 5.6. Policy 5.3: All rezonings must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan. For properties that are zoned inconsistent with the Future Land Use Designation Description Section but have nonetheless been determined to be consistent with the Future Land Use Element, as provided for in Policies 5.9 through 5.13, the following provisions apply: •RESPONSE_ The One Naples mixed use marina planned development is not internally consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. •RESPONSE_The One Naples mixed use marina planned development is not compatible with and complementary to the Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhoods (see Stuart Exhibits 2 through 9). The project fails to meet it’s entitlement request criteria under LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5. OBJECTIVE 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: •RESPONSE_The One Naples project’s development character is not compatible and complimentary to existing development character (see Stuart Exhibits 2 through 9). The project is not consistent with Objective 7 and Policies 7.3 and 7.4. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/ or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. •RESPONSE_ The applicant is applying for a plat vacation for Gulf Shore Court and the western portion of Center Street (PL20200000368 is a Petition for Vacation). By Page of 24 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) definition and logic, the plat vacation demonstrates comprehensive plan Policy 7.3 inconsistency. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. •RESPONSE_ The One Naples project’s development height, bulk and building form is not compatible and complimentary to the Gulf Shore and Vanderbilt Beach road streetscape (see Stuart Exhibits 3 through 9). Final Opinion _ Logic and Basis It is not fairly debatable that the map amendment logically fits into, is complimentary and compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods. The amendment and companion re- zoning doubles density and building height, significantly reduces and/or eliminates development setback standards, and reduces required minimum open space by 50%. The project puts forth a design that does not address the relationship of it’s 40-ft tall parking garage and 208-ft tall high-rise buildings to streetscape pedestrian experience. The application lacks sufficient information regarding non-residential use location, architecture elevations, landscaping, lighting and signage cross sections. The surrounding neighborhood’s 7 story average height, and 2, 5 and 12 story buildings with code compliant setbacks is the neighborhood form and context. The One Naples project development standards are completely opposite of the surrounding neighborhoods. Thus it is not logical to deem the project “compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses” . The application does not address waterfront compatibility concerns and marina impacts. As of March 27, 2020, there is no marina related and upland to marina design integration and impact information in the map amendment and zoning files. Therefore it is not logical to deem the marina compatible and complementary with the neighborhood since there is no information. •COMMENT _ The small map amendment presents little, if any, justification and meaningful public benefits for site intensification. The subject Gulf Shore Drive/ Vanderbilt Beach Road property is unique and valuable. The existing C-3 zoning grants private land use benefit while allowing for public use and activities. The requested PUDZ offers benefits primarily to the residents of the project while offering relatively “thin” public commitments when examined to the value that the public sector is being asked to transfer by the amendment and rezoning: •Site access improvements, technology enhancements and infrastructure improvements •Pedestrian Improvements - undefined sidewalk along Gulf Shore Dr., 8-ft. Multi-path along the north side of Vanderbilt and enhanced landscaping (Ex. G) •Emergency Management - 150 cots to Collier Co Emergency Management and a 16-ft. Enclosed Utility Trailer Page of 25 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Final Opinion _ Factual Evidence The Applicant has not submitted for review accurate neighborhood development character analysis and marina impact analysis analyses as required by F.S. § 163.3202 and 163.3177(6), and Collier Co. 10.02.13 a – f PUD Master Plan, 10.03.06 b Compatibility Application information, 4.07.04 Mixed-use PD hour of operations, and 5.05.02 marina review. As of March 27, 2020 the application is not sufficient and lacks adequate factual information. The requested One Naples Mixed Use lacks factual neighborhood compatibility and impact evidence in making the case that it complies with Policy 5.6 and that the projects fits with the surrounding neighborhood character. The land use amendment and zoning lack predictable eveidence; they do not rely on accepted Vanderbilt Beach Rd and Gulf Shore Drive development context. Factual analysis would show that the surrounding relevant neighborhoods for compatibility assessment are north of Vanderbilt Beach Road, not south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd. These neighborhoods have a Coastal Suburban development form and pattern, characterized as having a range of low to mid-rise building height (5 to 12 stories), code compliant roadway setbacks, minimum 25-ft waterfront setbacks and minimum 30% open space. The map amendment and companion zoning requests a development design based on a Coastal Urban Resort building form. This urban form is characterized by narrow road setbacks, high-rise tall buildings and little open space. The project’s Coastal Urban Resort building form is inherently distinct and separate from the neighborhood’s suburban form and context. The applicant has not provided any evidence to justify an urban coastal building form to a suburban coastal building form. Finally, it is impossible for the project to meet neighborhood compatibility provisions because of this design model choice. •COMMENT _ To ensure community character and compatibility, accepted planning practices may include using following techniques: •An incremental density and building height design standard changes; •Match and use existing setback dimensions; and •Design for pedestrian scale at the streetscape and waterfront. These three planning practices are not utilized by the applicant. Therefore the application’s Master Concept Plan and Development Standards are not logically based on professional planning principles and practices. •COMMENT _ The application does not comply with 163.3177(6) in that compatibility assessment was based on a limited adjoining property mapping analysis (see Applicant Map C). As such the project’s land use planning analysis is flawed. The application has not provided meaningful justification for the request for increased intensity, increased building height and significantly reduced setbacks. The application is internally inconsistent with 8 Collier growth management plan objectives and policies, including the “compatibility” Policy 5.6. The application is not based on factual evidence and does not comply with 163.3177(2). Page of 26 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Final Opinion _ Unique Privileges and Future Interests The map amendment will grant a unique and special privilege to the applicant that other Gulf Shore Drive property owners may or may not enjoy, or that can be used for future Gulf Shore Drive density increase requests. The approval of the map amendment and companion rezoning will grant the applicant a unique and special privilege by doubling density from 16 to 31 units per acre, increasing building height by 208%, and reducing setbacks by 60% , in return for limited public benefit commitments. The map amendment is not necessary and fails to demonstrate any type of land use planning deficiency which it is intended to address. •COMMENT _ Not withstanding that every land use amendment request is different and has its own context, merits and faults, it is easy to envision the One Naples approval being used for future “redevelopment” projects within the Gulf Shore Drive neighborhoods. Referring to the Gulf Shore Drive Redevelopment Sites Exhibit 10 there are 12 potential redevelopment sites that can possibly benefit from the precedent created by the One Naples approval. It can be argued that One Naples approval will be transformative. It is more than likely that the One Naples approval will be used for future Gulf Shore Drive density increase requests whose impacts have not been anticipated in the Collier Growth Management Plans land use and transportation planning horizon projections. Final Opinion _ Community Character and Compatibility Impacts Please refer to the Opinion Letter’s Project Overview section 6, the Building Height Compatibility section findings, the Community Character and Waterfront Impacts section findings, and Exhibits 1 through 9. The application has failed to demonstrate how the map Page of 27 29 Potential Redevelopment Site Built In 1988 _ 10686 Gulf Shore Dr. Monte Carlo Club Condo. 400 Flagship Dr. The Regatta w./180-ft. +/- Setback 8787 Bay Colony Drive, Trieste At Bay Colony w./145-ft +/- Setback 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) amendment and zoning will create a “high quality mixed use development that is complimentary to and compatible with the surrounding development”. The One Naples Master Concept Plan and development standards will create a non-complimentary “hard- edge” Miami-like coastal urban resort building form, defined by tall buildings with narrow setbacks and negative pedestrian streetscape attributes. Page of 28 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) The request is in contrast to the Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhood context. Adjacent neighborhoods are defined with a “soft-edge” suburban form, with more moderate building heights and code-compliant setbacks. The application’s objective to “create a desirable mixed use development by bringing related activities closer together”, is not supported by the too-narrow setbacks, too-tall buildings, and a dead streetscape designed at a non-pedestrian height, bulk and scale; it lacks a pedestrian-friendly streetscape. The project will negatively impact neighborhood character. The use of large monolithic structures are contrary to good contextual development design. The project’s dual street fronting 40-ft tall parking garage/podium setback 15-ft, or the project’s 525-ft long 87-ft tall waterfront building with zero setback, present height, mass and bulk neighborhood compatibility impacts. Conclusion It is the authors opinion that approval of the subject One Naples FLUM Amendment and companion Planned Development zoning is not logically supported by data, analysis and accepted professional land use principles and practices. The application did not perform accurate and requisite analyses as per 163.3177(6). Information including a factual neighborhood building height study, other neighborhood planning studies, architectural elevations, streetscape and waterfront cross-sections is required to establish community character and neighborhood compatibility findings. The application did not provide meaningful justification. An approval of the March 27, 2020 application will not be logical, predictable and fair. It is factually evident that project’s Master Concept Plan and accompanying density increase, building height increase and reduced development standards will not be compatible with, and complementary to the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code and in violation of Policy 5.6. The amendment and zoning are internally inconsistent with 8 objectives and policies of the Collier Growth Management Plan and Land Use element and in violation with FSS 163.3177(2). The map amendment and zoning violate professional fairness principles and planning practices by granting a unique and special privilege to the applicant that other Gulf Shore Drive owners may or may not enjoy, or that will be used for future Gulf Shore Drive density increase requests. The application is not necessary and fails to demonstrate any type of land use planning deficiency which it is intended to address. I look forward to discussing this issue with you in the near future. Sincerely yours, Greg Stuart, MUP CC:Craig Kasper, Jim Cleveland, Bill Oliver GS/projects/20030/20april20stuart_One Naples_Opinionletter Page of 29 29 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Memorandum To: Mr. Robert Pritt, Esq., Cc: Mr. Craig Kasper, Mr. Greg Stuart From: W.E. Oliver, P.E., PTOE Subject: One Naples Development Proposal Review of Traffic Studies Date: April 17, 2020 Mr. Pritt, Below, please find my comments regarding the traffic impact studies submitted by the applicant to Collier County. In summary, there remain issues that are unaddressed, and the documentation of issues that are addressed is lacking. Collier County should request that the applicant provide information as discussed below. Land Use Plan Amendment Request An amendment to a land use plan to increase density, and therefore traffic generation, for a given parcel of land inevitably sets a precedent for other parcels of land to request similar densities. Consideration of a land use plan amendment that sets precedent for greater intensities, therefore, should also consider the implications of the change, and similar changes for which it sets precedent, on the existing and planned transportation network. The existing road network, specifically Vanderbilt Beach Road, is acknowledged to experience high degrees of congestion on weekdays as well as weekends during peak months under existing land uses. These land uses have not been developed to their full potential for traffic generation. The adopted 2040 Transportation Plan, which by state law is to be consistent with the Land Use Plan, projects an approximate 25 percent increase in traffic volumes. This will create extreme congestion and likely press more traffic into the adjacent Naples Park neighborhood. No analysis of long-term traffic conditions or adjacent neighborhood streets has been undertaken, as is required by Transportation Element Policies 5.1 and 7.2. No plan of improvements to address roadway operations on Vanderbilt Beach Road exists or has been committed to by the appropriate implementing parties. January 8,2020 Traffic Impact Statement for One Naples Prepared for purposes of addressing the County’s concurrency policies, this report provides a very simple comparison of current plus development peak hour traffic volumes to a generalized estimate of roadway capacity. The roadway capacity value used would reflect near-ideal operating conditions (e.g. not affected by pedestrians crossing the road). Review of traffic count data indicates very consistent traffic volumes for many hours of the day, suggesting that traffic flow (and therefore the traffic count data) is constrained by the existing road capacity. A more detailed analysis is needed that includes analysis of the signalized intersections of Vanderbilt Beach Road with North Pointe Drive, Hammock Oak/Gulf Pavilion Drive, and US 41. 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) March 27, 2020 Traffic Impact Statement for One Naples The report concludes that operational issues are created by the parking garage and the three-way stop control at Gulf Shore Drive, and recommends changes that will produce beneficial results. These improvements should be implemented whether or not One Naples is developed. However, the extent to which they yield beneficial results, particularly in the case of the parking garage, is not established. The analysis relies on Sim-Traffic software. Sim-Traffic has substantial limitations. There is no indication in the documentation regarding model validation. For example, where the report acknowledges severe congestion associated with the parking garage entrance, the Sim-Traffic reports do not reflect or validate this issue. There is no clear statement of the demand traffic volumes on which the analysis is based, or documentation of the road network coding. The report provided does not provide indications of delay by intersection movement. The applicant should provide the associated Synchro input files for review. In Appendix B, Scenarios 3 and 4, with project, the results for the Gulf Shore Ct site access location to Vanderbilt Beach Rd are not provided. Where they are reported, site exit queues appear to be long for site egress, suggesting very long delays. The analysis recommends implementation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Rd at Gulf Shore Drive without providing justification or discussion of why this is recommended. Traffic signals cultivate a “drive fast then stop and wait” style of driving, whereas roundabouts cultivate a slower, more uniform speeds -- “calmer” traffic flow -- which better fits the character and safety needs of the area with the heavy pedestrian and bicycling activity. The March 27, 2020 Traffic Impact Statement indicates a reduction in average vehicle speeds in the network analyzed from 17 mph (with roundabout) and 16 mph (with signal) without the proposed development to 14 mph with the proposed development, which contradicts the general conclusion expressed that One Naples will not have significant impacts. One Naples will aggravate existing traffic operational issues, and additional analysis and better documentation of the analyses submitted are needed. Unaddressed is to what extent beach parking is facilitated on the property to be developed, and if replacement parking can be found. 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 850 Park Shore Drive Trianon Centre, Third Floor Naples, FL 34103 Direct Dial 239.649.2714 PHONE 239.649.6200 FAX 239.261.3659 rpritt@ralaw.com WWW.RALAW.COM April 28, 2020 Via E-Mail only Mark Strain, Chair mark.strain@colliercountyfl.gov Collier County Planning Commission Leo Ochs, County Manager leo.ochs@colliercountyfl.gov Jeffrey A. Klatzkow, County Attorney jeffrey.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov 3299 Tamiami Trail E, Suite 303 Naples, Florida 34112 Re: Naples One –Stock Development Vacation Petition—202000000368 PUDZ Application—PL20190000697 GMPA Application—Small Scale Amendment Dear Administrative Staff and Planning Commission: This Firm represents Regatta at Vanderbilt Commons (Regatta), a Property Owners’ association for the Regatta Developments located very near the proposed One Naples Development by Stock Development. That development consists of a Petition to Vacate a street, a Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to create a sub-district specifically tailored one development, and a Planned Unit Development Zoning (PUDZ) to effectuate the Developer’s plan for development. Regatta opposes the development as currently proposed. Regatta has engaged an expert Planner, Gregory Stuart, and an expert traffic engineer, William Oliver, to review the applications. Their preliminary analyses and conclusions are attached. 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) April 28, 2020 Page 2 Additionally, the undersigned has reviewed the applications and believe them to legally incompatible with the existing development patterns in the neighborhood (external incompatibility), inconsistent with the compatibility requirements of the GMP, illegal spot zoning, inconsistent with transportation requirements, overly dense, exceeding compatible heights (in places), and harmful to the safety and welfare of the immediate and surrounding neighborhoods. As currently proposed, Stock now wishes to accomplish the following (inter alia) (There is a redline Exhibit B submitted showing changes from earlier submittals.): Principal Uses 1. Multi-family residential and/or hotel units not to exceed 172 total units. 2. Up to 10,000 square feet of the following uses: a. Retail; b. Restaurant, eating and drinking establishments; and c. Personal services. d. Professional Office. 3. Marina, limited to use by residents and guests only, except that a maximum of 4 slips may be leased to charter boat vessels and including the following uses (open to the public) limited to a maximum of 1,000 square feet: a. A ship’s store;, limited to 1,000 square feet and b. Marine fueling facility may be open to the public accessing the site via the water. B. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Hearing Examiner or BZA, by the process outlined in the LDC. Development Standards Building Heights—now 208, 182, 77 & 55’ Setbacks—0-to 30’ The Developer makes the usual arguments: a. That it is going to be real nice (luxury). Response: Of course, being luxury for the future buyers does not make it nice for the surrounding neighborhood and is at expense of the neighborhood. b. The Current Commercial zoning in the area is worse. Response: This is a common threat and is factually incorrect. C-3 standards are compatible with the community character and allow for appropriate density, height and setbacks, and lead to less traffic disruption. The neighbors are willing to take the chance that development under the current 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) April 28, 2020 Page 3 zoning will yield the same or better products for the overall community with much less density, height or traffic disruption. c. There will be no traffic problem. Response: The traffic situation is untenable now, and any increases in density in are certain to add incrementally to the traffic. The County should require the scope of the traffic analysis to include the effect on Naples Park in general, since there are virtually no sufficient arterials to serve as outlets for traffic. Additionally, the proposals for reduction of traffic (such as improvements to the parking garage) are insufficient and are things that should have been done anyway. d. The proposed development has been scaled back. Response: This is also a common developer’s strategy—Take a purposely outlandish initial proposal and “graciously” reduce it to a still grossly intense proposal--to make the subsequent proposal sound reasonable. A grossly overbuilt development should not be approved on the false notion that it is less onerous than the original proposal. For some reason, it has worked in Collier County, but it should not. e. Finally, any review is severely hampered by the lack of architectural design information. Developer has freely shared designs with the news media, and likely County decision-makers, for public relations purposes, but not for actual permit approval. We assume that it intends to withhold that information until the site plan review, but one cannot expect the neighborhood or decision- makers to assume that the project is compatible and complementary to the neighborhood, without seeing a design package, especially since the neighbors will have little to no input at the administrative stage. For these reasons and others that are in the attachments, and for reasons that will likely come up during the analysis, Regatta requests that the County review staff, the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners reject the applications, Very truly yours, ROETZEL & ANDRESS, LPA Robert D. Pritt Enc. Stuart Analysis Oliver Analysis Cc: Board of Collier County Commissioners--burt.saunders@colliercountyfl.gov Collier County Community Development Collier County Zoning Division—ray.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov Collier County Department of Transportation 14986508 _4 118525.0005 - 4/28/2020 4:22:56 PM 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:Marsha O <naplesmarsha9@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, April 30, 2020 12:57 PM To:SaboJames; SchmidtCorby; BellowsRay Cc:bstock@stockdevelopment.com; kgelder@stockdevelopment.com; straight maureen Subject:Stock Development Applications PL20190000697; PL20190000696 Attachments:Submittal 3 - Exhibit IV.B.1. VBRMUSD GMPA Language (rev 3-27-2020).pdf; Submittal 3 - One Naples MPUD Document (REDLINE COMPARING 1-16-2020 TO 3-27-2020).pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello, I'm not sure which of you are the most appropriate person to receive this email so am sending to all. Mr Stock and Mr Gelder met with me and Maureen Straight, representatives of Naples Park Area Association about their pending applications and had a nicely productive meeting. We asked about languate in the Growth Management Plan Amendment and asked if two items could be updated to align with the lanugage in their MPUD Exhibit A. They indicated willingness to update and Keith was tasked with the action which we much appreciate. This email is to inform you of the request so you can expect and accept the update to the Exhibit IV.B.1 Proposed GMPA Ammendment. Item #2 Should be changed to "Multi‐family residential and/or hotel rooms not to exceed 172 total units." Item #6 Should be changed to "The MPUD shall include a maximum PM Peak Hour trip cap of 148 which will be the overriding limit on any combination of the above uses." These changes will make the amendment language consist with the MPUD Exhibit A language and the PM Peak Hour trip value noted in their letter to NPAA of March 27. I enclose the two current exhibits here for your convenience. Thank you for your consideration of this email and for all the work you do to enable appropriate and positive growth for Collier County. Sincerely, ‐‐ Marsha Oenick 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Underlined text proposed to be added; struck-through text proposed to be deleted. Page 1 H:\2016\2016025\WP\SSGMPA\Initial Submittal\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\Exhibit IV.B.1. VBRMUSD GMPA Language (rev 3-27-2020).docx EXHIBIT “IV.B.1” PROPOSED GMPA AMENDMENT LANGUAGE Proposed Small Scale Amendments to the Collier County Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Related to 5.42 ± Acres Located Near the Western Terminus of Vanderbilt Beach Road, at the northeast corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive North, in Section 32, Township 48, Range 25. Amend the FLUE DESCRIPTION SECTION, Section I, URBAN DESIGNATION, Subsection A. Urban Mixed-Use District, Page 28, as follows: 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrate d. This Subdistrict comprises approximately 93,000 acres and 80% of the Urban Mixed Use District. Maximum eligible residential density shall be determined through the Density Rating System but shall not exceed 16 dwelling units per acre except in accordance with the Transfer of Development Rights Section of the Land Development Code. Amend the FLUE DESCRIPTION SECTION, Section I, URBAN DESIGNATION, Subsection A. Urban Mixed-Use District, Page 49, as follows: 20. Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Subdistrict Purpose/Intent: The Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed-Use Subdistrict (VBRMUSD) is 5.42 +/- acres in size and is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive, in Section 32, Township 48, Range 35. The purpose and intent of the mixed-use Subdistrict is to provide for greater intensity, density, and flexibility in applicable Site Design and Development Standards in order to promote redevelopment of the site with a resort tourism centered project, which shall include a mixture of residential and/or hotel, restaurant, retail, and waterfront marina uses, subject to the following requirements and limitations: 1. The Subdistrict shall be rezoned to Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD); 2. A maximum of 172 multi-family residential dwelling units and/or hotel rooms/suites is allowed; 3. A minimum of 40 residential units is required and shall be developed as a component of the initial Site Development Plan (SDP); 4. A maximum of 10,000 square feet of the following uses, as permitted under the C-3 zoning district is allowed: a. Retail; b. Restaurant; 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Underlined text proposed to be added; struck-through text proposed to be deleted. Page 2 H:\2016\2016025\WP\SSGMPA\Initial Submittal\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\Exhibit IV.B.1. VBRMUSD GMPA Language (rev 3-27-2020).docx c. Personal Services, d. Professional and Medical Offices 5. A marina, with boat slips limited to use by residents and guests only, except that a maximum of 4 slips may be leased to charter boats and a ship’s store and marine fueling facility may be open public accessing the site from the water. 6. The MPUD shall include a maximum PM Peak Hour trip cap which will be the overriding limit on any combination of the above uses. Amend the FLUE, B. DENSITY RATING SYSTEM, 1.e., Pages 50 and 51, as follows: e. All new residential zoning located within Districts, Subdistricts and Overlays identified above that are subject to this Density Rating System shall be consistent with this Density Rating System, except as provided in: 1) Policy 5.3 of the Future Land Use Element. 2) The Urban Mixed Use District for the “vested” Port of the Islands development. 3) The Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict 4) The Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict. 5) The Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict. 6) Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict. 7) Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict. 8) The Mini Triangle Mixed Use Subdistrict. 9) The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay. 10) The Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict (VBRMUSD) Amend the FLUE FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES, Page 147, as follows: FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Future Land Use Map Activity Center Index Map (XV) Mixed Use & Interchange Activity Center Maps Mixed Use & Interchange Activity Center Maps *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Seed to Table Commercial Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 1 of 14 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\One Naples MPUD Document (REDLINE COMPARING 1-16-2020 TO 3-27-2020) .docx EXHIBIT A ONE NAPLES MPUD LIST OF PERMITTED USES MU TRACTS PERMITTED USES: The PUD may be developed entirely as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered, or used, or land used, in whole or in part, within the One Naples MPUD, for other than the following: I. Principal Uses A. Mixed Uses 1. Multi-family residential and/or hotel units not to exceed 240172 total units. 2. Up to 2510,000 square feet of the following uses: a. Retail (SIC 5311-5399; 5411-5499; 5611-5699; 5712-5736; 5912; 5921); b. Restaurant, eating and drinking establishments (5812 and 5813); and c. Personal services (7212, 7231, and 7241). d. Professional and Medical Office. 3. Private marina with a maximum of 99 wet slips (Marina, limited to use by residents and guests only),, except that a maximum of 4 slips may be leased to charter boat vessels and including the following uses (open to the public) limited to a maximum of 1,000 s.f.: a. A ship’s store;, limited to 1,000 square feet and b. Marine marine fueling facility may be open to the public accessing the site via the water. B. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Hearing Examiner or BZA, by the process outlined in the LDC. II. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures permitted by right in this MPUD, including, but not limited to: A. Residential Accessory Uses: 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 2 of 14 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\One Naples MPUD Document (REDLINE COMPARING 1-16-2020 TO 3-27-2020) .docx 1. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents of the PUD, such as swimming pools, fitness centers, dining facilities, sports courts, and recreation/amenity buildings. 2. Customary accessory uses and structures to residential units, including parking structures, gazebos, fountains, trellises, signage, and similar structures. 3. Temporary sales facilities may be permitted. B. Commercial Accessory Uses: 1. Caretaker’s residences, subject to LDC Section 5.03.05. 2. Temporary display of merchandise during business hours provided it does not adversely affect pedestrian or vehicular traffic or public health or safety as determined by the County. Merchandise storage and display is prohibited within front yards adjacent to public rights of way, unless permitted though a temporary use permit for a special event. 3. Customary accessory uses and structures to commercial development, including parking structures, gazebos, fountains, trellises, and similar structures. 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 3 of 14 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\One Naples MPUD Document (REDLINE COMPARING 1-16-2020 TO 3-27-2020) .docx EXHIBIT B ONE NAPLES MPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for residential and commercial land uses within One Naples MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MU Tract 1 MU Tract 2 MU Tract 3 MU Tract 4 PRICIPAL USES MIN. LOT AREA 20,000 s.f. 25,000 s.f 25,000 s.f. 25,000 s.f. MIN. LOT WIDTH1 50’ 50’ 50’ 50’ MIN. FLOOR AREA2 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. PERIMETER SETBACKS3 GULF SHORE DRIVE 10’15’ to Parking Deck, 25’ to Tower N/A N/A N/A VANDERBILT BEACH RD. 10’15’ to Parking Deck, 25’ to Tower 10’15’ N/A N/A SOUTHBAY DRIVE 0’10’ to Parking Deck, 25’ to Tower 10’ 0’10’ 10’ CENTER STREET 10’ 0’ 10’ N/A N/A WATERFRONT N/A N/A 5’0’ 0’ BAREFOOT PELICAN CONDO. PL. N/A N/A N/A ½ ZONED BH4 ALL OTHER YARDS 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15’50’ 15’N/A 15’30’ 30’ MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT MAX.MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTMAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED (ZONED) 205’182’ 65’55’ 65’55’ 55’ MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED (ACTUAL) 235’208’ 77’ 87’ 87’ ACCESSORY STRUCTURESUSES MINIMUM YARDS (PERIMETER BUFFERS) SETBACKS: ADJACENT TO PUBLIC STREET S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. SETBACKS: ALL OTHER YARDS S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED (ZONED) 50’40’ 30’S.P.S. 30’S.P.S. 30’ MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED (ACTUAL) S.P.S.45’ S.P.S.40’ S.P.S.40’ 40’ 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 4 of 14 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\One Naples MPUD Document (REDLINE COMPARING 1-16-2020 TO 3-27-2020) .docx s.f. = square feet S.P.S. = Same as Principal Structures 1 As measured by frontage on a public right-of-way or internal driveway. 2 For residential dwelling units, Hotelhotel suites/rooms and commercial uses are not subject to a minimum floor area requirement. 3 Cantilevered structures, on the second and subsequent stories, may encroach a maximum of 4 feet into a required setback. 4 Setback to the common property line between MU Tract 4 and the Barefoot Pelican Condominium shall be a minimum of ½ the Zoned Building Height 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 5 of 14 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\One Naples MPUD Document (REDLINE COMPARING 1-16-2020 TO 3-27-2020) .docx 9.A.2.lPacket Pg. 514Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 6 of 14 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\One Naples MPUD Document (REDLINE COMPARING 1-16-2020 TO 3-27-2020) .docx 9.A.2.lPacket Pg. 515Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 7 of 14 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\One Naples MPUD Document (REDLINE COMPARING 1-16-2020 TO 3-27-2020) .docx 9.A.2.lPacket Pg. 516Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 8 of 14 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\One Naples MPUD Document (REDLINE COMPARING 1-16-2020 TO 3-27-2020) .docx EXHIBIT D ONE NAPLES MPUD - LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 11 THROUGH 32, BLOCK "A" VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND A PORTION OF VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK "D", OF SAID VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER SUBDIVISION AND A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GULF SHORE DRIVE (70 FEET WIDE PER SAID PLAT) AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTHBAY DRIVE (PER RESOLUTION 94-61) (COMMERCE STREET PER SAID PLAT) (60 FEET WIDE PER SAID PLAT); THENCE S.89°52'30"E. ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 552.44 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK "B" OF SAID PLAT; THENCE S.00°07'30"W. ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10 A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, BLOCK "B"; THENCE N.89°52'30"W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS 7 THROUGH 10, BLOCK "B" OF SAID PLAT A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE S.00°07'30"W. A DISTANCE OF 143.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 4, BLOCK "C" OF SAID PLAT AND A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CENTER STREET (60.00 FEET WIDE PER SAID PLAT); THENCE S.84°40'40"E. ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 18, BLOCK "C" OF SAID PLAT AND SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 358.37 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 18, BLOCK "C" OF SAID PLAT AND THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CENTER STREET AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID SOUTHBAY DRIVE (60.00 FOOT WIDE COMMERCE STREET PER SAID PLAT); THENCE S.06°04'30"E. ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 18, BLOCK "C", AND SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 125.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 18, BLOCK "C" AND A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD (100.00 FOOT WIDE PER SAID PLAT) THENCE N.80°29'30"W. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 792.84 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 8, BLOCK "D" OF SAID PLAT AND THE INTERSECTION OF SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GULFSHORE DRIVE (70.00 FOOT WIDE PER SAID PLAT); THENCE N.08°23'20"W. ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 274.80 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 5.42 ACRES MORE OR LESS 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 9 of 14 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\One Naples MPUD Document (REDLINE COMPARING 1-16-2020 TO 3-27-2020) .docx EXHIBIT E ONE NAPLES MPUD LIST OF DEVIATIONS FROM LDC In addition to the specific deviations listed below, additional deviations may be requested from any otherwise applicable architectural, landscape, dimensional, or design standards set forth in the LDC, excluding building height. Any such request for deviation shall utilize process and procedures set forth in LDC Section 10.02.03.F, Site plan with deviations for redevelopment projects, but shall not be subject to the limitations set forth therein. Architectural Standards: 1. Deviation from LDC 5.05.08.D.3 - Façade/Wall Height Transition Elements (.c.i., which statesrequires that transitional “Transitional massing elements can be no more than 100 percent taller than the average height of the adjacent building,buildings [within 150 feet], but no more than 30 feet, and no less than 10ten feet above the existing grade,” to instead allow for the high-rise elements of buildings, in the location depicted on the PUD master planparking podium, on MU Tract 1, which functions as a transitional massing element, to be up to 205 feet in zoned building height and 235a maximum of 35 feet in actual building height. Landscape Standards: 2. Deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.C., which establishes the types and widths required for perimeter buffers, to instead allow for perimeter buffer widths to be a minimum of 10 feet, utilizing portions of both the private property and in some cases on the adjacent public right of way, through a landscape maintenance agreement with Collier County, as depicted on the attached “One Naples ROW, Mobility, and Landscape Enhancement Plan” exhibit. Other: 32. Deviation from LDC Section 4.05.04.G Table 17 Parking Space Requirements which allows small-scale recreation facilities that are accessory to a Multi -family project and intended only for the residents of that project, exclusive of “golf courses/clubhouses”, to be calculated at 50 percent of normal requirements where the majorit y of the dwelling units are not within 300 feet of the recreation facilities and at 25 percent of the normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are within 300 feet of the recreation facilities to instead allow “golf courses/clubhouses” to be included in the applicable parking reductions allowed for Multi-family projects. 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 10 of 14 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\One Naples MPUD Document (REDLINE COMPARING 1-16-2020 TO 3-27-2020) .docx EXHIBIT F ONE NAPLES MPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 1. PUD COMMITMENTS A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the MPUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Vanderbilt Naples Holdings, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document, to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to the County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the MPUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity will not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the MPUD is closed out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. TRANSPORTATION A. The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 275148 two- way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. B. The Developer shall provide the following, subject to design approval by Collier County Transportation: Potential List Under Discussion with Transportation Services: i. Design and installation of a traffic signal at Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive; 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 11 of 14 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\One Naples MPUD Document (REDLINE COMPARING 1-16-2020 TO 3-27-2020) .docx ii. Design and installation of an extended left turn into Collier County parking garages; iii. Design and installation of enhanced technology for Collier County parking garage including signage upgrades for notification to public of garage parking availability; iv. Design and installation of improvements to South Bay Drive, including removal of roadside swales and installation of a closed drainage system, 10’ travel lanes, 4’ bike lanes, 5’ sidewalks on both sides of the road; v. Design and installation of a sidewalk along east side of Gulf Shore Drive adjacent to project; and vi. Design and installation of an 8’ wide multi-use pathway along the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, from the terminus of existing pathway to Gulf Shore Drive. vii. Design, install, and maintain enhanced landscaping (above and beyond required perimeter buffers, which are provided as required) as depicted on Exhibit G. subject to subject to final County approval of the required Right of Way Permit and Landscape Maintenance Agreement. 3. PUBLIC UTILITIES A. Wastewater generated by the proposed development shall be routed to gravity sewer on Vanderbilt Beach Road, southeast of the project. 4. EMERGENCY MANGEMENT A. The Developer shall provide the following: i. Twenty-four (24) Medical and Standard Cots and one hundred fifty (150) Standard cots are to be provided FOB to Collier County Emergency Management at the time of the release of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Collier County Emergency Management will provide specifications, a roster of vendors and the shipping address upon request of the developer as the first certificate of occupancy is identified. ii. One (1) 16 ft. dual axel trailer enclosed utility trailer shall be provided FOB Naples as the first certificate of occupancy is identified with instructions to convey title or certificate of origin to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. 9.A.2.l Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 12 of 14 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\One Naples MPUD Document (REDLINE COMPARING 1-16-2020 TO 3-27-2020) .docx 9.A.2.lPacket Pg. 521Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 13 of 14 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\One Naples MPUD Document (REDLINE COMPARING 1-16-2020 TO 3-27-2020) .docx 9.A.2.lPacket Pg. 522Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page 14 of 14 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\2nd Resubmittal\One Naples MPUD Document (REDLINE COMPARING 1-16-2020 TO 3-27-2020) .docx 9.A.2.lPacket Pg. 523Attachment: April 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 May 6, 2020 To: Mr. Ray Bellows, Planning Manager, Collier County Zoning and Planning Ms.Trinity Scott, Transportation Planning Manager, Collier County Re: PUDZPL20190000697 From: Michael Seef & Bonnie Michaels We as Beachwalk residents request that you deny the One Naples development for the following reasons: Zoning and Growth Management: It is currently zoned C-3 for commercial such as box store, movie theater, restaurant, or hotel. The recent proposal is two towers with 172 residences or possibly a hotel with 300 rooms. One Naples claims a hotel will add more traffic than residential. They are also proposing 10,000 square feet for commercial use. Their alternate scenario of a box store or the like is a highly unlikely considering there is limited parking and considering competition from nearby stores such as Walmart, Office Depot, Marketplace shopping, Pavilion shopping, and Mercato, all with extensive parking. The claim by Naples One and an earlier transportation TIS reported that C-3 existing zoning would create less traffic thereby justifying residential zoning. It also did not apparently consider the many traffic issues discussed below. We urge you to adhere to current land development code zoning and not amend the growth management plan! Zoning and growth management by variance and amendment requests for applying extensive and non-conforming designs should not be permitted. “Planning by variances is not planning”. The public neighborhood is clear on this. (see 400 +public meeting March 3rd). The proposed ultra-high density with 2 out-of- proportion, 16 story towers plus 2 stories for parking are currently proposed. Together with insufficient setbacks and spacing as Zoning requires makes for untenable fit in this acreage. Naples One must concur with current LDC and GMP. The density for 217 residential and hotel units on 5.6 acres is incongruent with all nearby communities . The Land Development Code has strict requirements for setbacks and distances between buildings depending on building heights. One Naples proposal must adhere to all of them as well as the GMP. “There is no planning when a commission can arbitrarily change zoning and growth management policies and approve requested variances that conflict with safety, community rights, and common sense. “ Roadway Future Consideration: The county is extending Vanderbilt Beach Road East to serve the Rural Lands Stewardship Area and pending villages and Golden Gate Estates. Traffic currently moving west to coastal urban areas and beaches will affect Vanderbilt Beach Road. This will generate thousands of cars and trips in the foreseeable future. Vanderbilt Beach Road west of highway 41 is 1.3 miles long with 2 lanes extending west from highway 41 to Gulf Shore Drive. Vanderbilt Beach Road east of 41 is currently four lanes with approvals for widening to six lanes. This will feed six lanes into two lanes west. 9.A.2.m Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: May 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 This plan should be denied and the proponent, Stock Development, should return with a plan adhering to current land development code zoning, Growth Management Plan, and a sensible transportation network defined. Further Traffic Considerations: • Vanderbilt Beach Road west of highway 41 has many intersecting roads, four to the north and 7 to the south, including Pavilion Shopping Center, Market Place Shopping Center, Oak Hammock to Pelican Bay, Pelican Bay Inn Hotel/Vanderbilt Beach Branch Library, Fire and Emergency Medical , Beachwalk , (see further below), North Point south to Pelican Bay, Vanderbilt Drive and Gulf Shore Drive north. There are two garage entrances south and a road south into the Ritz. • Gulf Shore Drive to Bluebill (111th Avenue) has no exits or turnarounds. Once making a turn north onto Gulf Shore Drive you are obligated to drive to the end. There are homes on both sides but a sidewalk only on the west side. There are narrow bi ke paths on both sides. Considering the safety clearance required of a car to pass a bicycle, this often forces cars to drive behind a bicycle or cross a yellow double center line. • Vanderbilt Drive extends north from Vanderbilt Beach Road to 111th street. There is a traffic signal. This road provides all of Naples Park with access. However, there is only one sidewalk which is on the west side. There are no bike paths on Vanderbilt Drive so bikers are in the street or on the sidewalk. This is unsafe for bikers, walkers, and cars. • North Point Drive goes south of Vanderbilt Beach Drive with two lanes into or out of Pelican Bay. There is a traffic light and pedestrian crossing. • Hammock Oak Drive is two lanes south of Vanderbilt Beach Road towards Pelican Bay with traffic lights and pedestrian crossings to the Pavilion shopping center. • Pelican Bay Park entrance and exit. Has this traffic been considered? • Has entrance and exit for fire EMT been factored into your traffic numbers and safety considerations? • There are two (2) garages south - one for beach parking and one for the Ritz Hotel. There is also a road leading into the Ritz. The Ritz Hotel has recently increased number of rooms and built a large additional garage supplementing their existing parking. Have you considered this additional traffic? • Beachwalk (where we live) is located north of Vanderbilt Beach Road with 356 dwellings and only one entrance - Beach Gate Drive. Located ¼ mile west of Hammock Oak Drive and ¼ mile east of the traffic light at North Pointe Drive. During the high season between January through May there is unending beach traffic both east and west from 7:00 AM – 11: 00 AM and evenings between 4:00 PM to 9:00 PM. with extra beach and commercial traffic in the morning and beach traffic at evening. It is frequently dangerous to exit the community left (heading east) onto Vanderbilt Beach Road. When practically impossible 9.A.2.m Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: May 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 3 turning left one could turn right (heading west) to get to highway 41; but then one has to go to 91st Street and at Highway 41 there is no left turn. This traffic diversion would be especially unsafe during evacuations. Have you considered current and future traffic affecting the adjacent Beachwalk, Regatta, Naples Park, and the Pelican Bay communities? • The Ritz Hotel is adding traffic with hundreds of vehicles during conferences. Have you considered this additional traffic? • Emergency Services and Sheriff must pass east or west on Vanderbilt Beach Road. • There are further traffic implications for the Naples Park Community with their 2 –lane roads when traffic would be diverted from bumper to bumper Vanderbilt Beach Road and then to either Vanderbilt Drive or Gulf Shore Drive. • 91st Ave through Naples Park would be a potential hurricane escape route or back route when Vanderbilt Beach Road is blocked with high traffic and intolerably busy. In an emergency 91st Ave could be an escape route or a back route to highway 41. As indicated above only a right turn is permissible at the 41traffic light making it extremely difficult when evacuation is to the north. Naples One suggested having signage west of highway 41 to alert drivers as to a full garage. This will still require traffic to either turn left onto North Point Avenue and then through Pelican Bay or continue to either Vanderbilt Drive or Gulf Shore Drive by turning north and going through Naples Park. Automating the County parking garage will not increase parking space s. Beach access: The county has been promoting beach access for tourists and local residents. With 172 dwellings and a possible hotel planned for One Naples, many more people will use Vanderbilt Beach. These together with additional demand for beach access from eastern developments as indicated above would increase potential for hundreds more people and cars daily. This will further deteriorate the natural beach which is already oversubscribed and over-crowded during season. The impact on the environment and wild life will be further impaired. Walkers, bicyclists, and added traffic Newly designed bike lanes on Vanderbilt Beach Road do not go all the way to the beach. They stop at Vanderbilt Drive. To get to the beach, bikers have to use the side walk from Vanderbilt Drive or from the parking garage. These are currently jammed with walkers, bicycles and a parking strip with car doors opening towards the sidewalk or onto VBR. Adding more car traffic from One Naples and from east would further increase the danger and chaos from turning vehicles to both walkers and bikers. That last block to the beach at Gulf Shore Drive is unsafe. This corner can barely handle current traffic safely. Summary The general Vanderbilt Beach Communities, including Naples Park, North Vanderbilt Beach, Pelican Bay, and Beachwalk needs versus Naples One development needs . We all require a safe, viable community that allows for access during both on and off seasonal times, mornings and evenings and considers emergencies. We need to know that if there is an emergency the EMS can reach us in a short time. Future developments by Naples One and the traffic from County growth to the east will have a dire effect. Our quality of life is already seriously affected by the increased tourism and traffic on Vanderbilt Beach Road. Adding more cars from Naples One 9.A.2.m Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: May 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4 as indicated above will only impact traffic further. As Collier County tax residents and tax payers we see no value in One Naples for the community. We want a development that fits in with the scale of the surrounding communities and allows safe roads and reasonable access, now and in the future. Respectfully, Michael Seef and Bonnie Michaels 9.A.2.m Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: May 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:Philip and Gail Dobbs <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Monday, May 11, 2020 3:01 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sebo, I am writing you in your capacity as the head planner in the One Naples development. I understand that your interest focuses on both the Parks and Rec and the zoning portions of the application. I have read you comments in your letter to Hole Montes of March 4. As to the former, I believe that some of the ideas that Stock has expressed for the garage do make sense, and may reduce, to some degree, the traffic situation. But, as I am sure you understand, even with garage upgrades, the proposed development will generate a significant increase in pedestrian traffic in the area, and automotive traffic as well. The garage ideas are fine, but they are nowhere near adequate to counterbalance the negative aspects of the project. In your role relating to zoning, I was most pleased with your “Correction Comments 1, 4, 6, 7, 17, 18, and 19” in the letter of March 4 relating to LDC Section 4.07.02 and others. These are very significant comments, and I look forward to Stock’s taking them very seriously and your continuing to “hold his feet to the fire,” to make him follow the law. Regarding number 6, specifically, does a justification saying that “this issue will be taken care of when the subdistrict is created” hold water? How can he apply for the PUD without already having subdistrict created? I am pleased that your reference the Vanderbilt Beach RT Overlay District. While it does not specifically cover this site, it sure speaks to the spirit of the whole neighborhood. I loved your request to have Stock “redesign” the project. Thanks for your good work. __________________________ ---------------------- 9.A.2.m Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: May 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Lori Burgess <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2020 1:12 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sebo, I am writing you in your capacity as the head planner in the One Naples development. I understand that your interest focuses on both the Parks and Rec and the zoning portions of the application. I have read you comments in your letter to Hole Montes of March 4. As to the former, I believe that some of the ideas that Stock has expressed for the garage do make sense, and may reduce, to some degree, the traffic situation. But, as I am sure you understand, even with garage upgrades, the proposed development will generate a significant increase in pedestrian traffic in the area, and automotive traffic as well. The garage ideas are fine, but they are nowhere near adequate to counterbalance the negative aspects of the project. In your role relating to zoning, I was most pleased with your “Correction Comments 1, 4, 6, 7, 17, 18, and 19” in the letter of March 4 relating to LDC Section 4.07.02 and others. These are very significant comments, and I look forward to Stock’s taking them very seriously and your continuing to “hold his feet to the fire,” to make him follow the law. Regarding number 6, specifically, does a justification saying that “this issue will be taken care of when the subdistrict is created” hold water? How can he apply for the PUD without already having subdistrict created? I am pleased that your reference the Vanderbilt Beach RT Overlay District. While it does not specifically cover this site, it sure speaks to the spirit of the whole neighborhood. I loved your request to have Stock “redesign” the project. Thanks for your good work. Lori A Burgess __________________________ ---------------------- 9.A.2.m Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: May 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:BellowsRay Sent:Monday, June 1, 2020 7:41 AM To:epircio@verizon.net Cc:SaboJames; AshtonHeidi; JenkinsAnita; FrenchJames; CohenThaddeus; FrantzJeremy Subject:Re: Meetings re One Naples Good morning, Thank you for letting me know your concerns and the desire of the community to participate in person at the planning commission meeting for the One Naples Rezone and GMP amendment petitions. It should be noted that these petitions are still under review and have not been scheduled for any planning commission meeting at this time. However, I will forward your comments to James Sabo concerning the developers proposed changes and lack of concessions. I will also asked that he provide an estimate on when this PUD Rezone petition is anticipated to be presented to the planning commission. Lastly, even though the County is developing easy to use procedures for virtual participation by the public, we are also developing procedures to allow for large numbers of the public to safely attend in person. I will have more details once the staff reviews of this petition near completion. Please let me know if I can be of any other assistance. Ray Ray V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Growth Management Department Planning & Zoning Division From: epircio@verizon.net <epircio@verizon.net> Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2020 4:59:40 PM To: BellowsRay Subject: Meetings re One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Bellows I understand that you are the person who represents both the Planning Staff and the Planning Commissioners. There are hundreds of Collier County residents who expect to voice their concerns regarding the One Naples Development located at Vanderbilt Beach. Over 400 of these people showed up at the NIM meeting held in March and that meeting went on for over 3 hours to allow anyone who wanted to speak to voice their concerns. I believe you attended that meeting for a brief time. Since that time the numbers of these people have grown to over one thousand most of whom will be expecting to attend the Planning Commissioners meetings as well as the County Commissioners meeting. Many of us who do not live in Florida full time will be flying to Naples for these meetings and will be expecting to speak. Some of us will have our attorneys there as well. 9.A.2.m Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: May 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 The opportunity to participate in this public forum is a right that we hold dear. Unfortunately, the corona virus pandemic will change how the meetings occur and their format. The public is constitutionally guaranteed their right to speak. I am writing to tell you that social distancing will be making this process very difficult right now. Many of us are elderly, or have compromised immune systems. Zoom meetings will not work either because some of us do not know how to use Zoom, nor have it downloaded. We want to see the developer face to face and express our concerns to him. We are still very dissatisfied with the minuscule concessions Stock has made to address our concerns. In conclusion, I think that any meetings should be held later on in the year when the cases of Covid have decreased, in a larger venue when social distancing can be utilized and everyone who wants to speak will be able to speak and stay as safe as possible. I urge you to take into consideration the rights and the health of all of us residents who want to participate in this process but not at the risk of our own safety. Respectfully, Elizabeth Pircio 781-690-0486 cell epircio@verizon.net Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.2.m Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: May 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 LynchDiane From:Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 2, 2020 11:35 AM To:SaboJames; WilliamsBarry; CarnellSteve Cc:CasalanguidaNick; AshtonHeidi Subject:ONENAPLES PROJECT; REQUEST FOR EMAILS AND ATTACHMENTS Attachments:Submittal 4 - JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good morning, please provide a copy of the entire associated email string and any and all attachments regarding the below email: Thanks Tony ANTHONY P. PIRES, JR., B.C.S. Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wpl-legal.com Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx 950 Encore Way • Naples, Florida 33919 • Phone 239.254-2000 • Fax: 239.254-2099 May 29, 2020 James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Collier County Government Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 Dear Mr. Sabo: In response to the County’s comment letter dated May 1, 2020, we offer the following responses: ADDRESSING - GIS REVIEW - ANNIS MOXAM 1. Exhibit F - Pages 10 - 11 of 12 street name Center Street N is incorrect, please correct to Center ST per Plat Book 3, Page 16. 2nd review: Same as above Response: Revised as requested. PARKS AND REC REVIEW - JAMES SABO 1. The egress and ingress on Gulf Shore Court appears to be directly across from the entrance to Vanderbilt Beach Garage. This is an extremely busy area and sometimes traffic backs up on Vanderbilt Beach with folks waiting to enter the garage. How does the developer propose to ensure congestion doesn’t occur here? Please address the questions and concerns. Update: 2/18/2020 The Parks and Recreation Division is in discussions with One Naples developer regarding improvements related to the Vanderbilt Beach Parking Garage, 17- parking spaces at Vanderbilt Beach, and Vanderbilt Beach access point. These discussions have centered on relieving congestion related to Naples One, but have not been finalized. Discussions to continue to develop mutual agreement related to easing congestion in this area. Update: 4/27/20 Parks and Rec has not confirmed that a mutual agreement has been finalized. Response: We have coordinated with Barry Williams, Director of CC Parks and Recreation. Barry has approved our proposed developer commitment (related to Developer funded County parking garage improvements See email below. 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 2 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx 2. Along Vanderbilt Beach Road, there are County beach parking spots that must be retained. How will the project effect those spots? Please address the concerns and questions. Update: 2/18/2020 The Parks and Recreation Division is in discussions with One Naples developer regarding improvements related to the Vanderbilt Beach Parking Garage, 17-parking spaces at Vanderbilt Beach, and Vanderbilt Beach access point. These discussions have centered on relieving congestion related to Naples One, but have not been finalized. Discussions to continue to develop mutual agreement related to easing congestion in this area. Update: 4/27/20 Parks and Rec has not confirmed that a mutual agreement has been finalized. Response: We have coordinated with Barry Williams, Director of CC Parks and Recreation. Barry has approved our proposed developer commitment (related to Developer funded County parking garage improvements See email below. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING REVIEW - MICHAEL SAWYER 1. Rev.3: Staff agrees that the meetings regarding operational improvements related to this development have been very productive. The timing of the improvements needs to be added to commitments, in addition the improvements have not been finalized and may be revised; updates will be needed as-if applicable for review by staff including CAO. Continue to make sure master plans are consistent and up-to-date as much as possible until finalized, including the noted improvements which can be shown on master plans. Rev.2: Understanding that work continues to resolve these issues there remain questions regarding driveways-garage connections-setbacks and how they will function. The additional master plans help but are not clear-readable currently. As issues are resolved and DCA is completed document 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 3 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx updates will be needed for consistency. Rev.1: Reference various master plans provided. There are inconsistent ROW vacations and access points shown including a potential partial vacation on South Bay Drive? Please explain and have consistent master plans. Additionally, there are numerous access points including “garage” access. Please explain how there's work avoiding additional conflicts on the adjacent roads. Please also show how the new site layout will replace-improve the existing roads if ROW's are vacated. At this point staff cannot agree to the proposed vacations. Response: We have added timing requirements to the commitments. It is our position that commitments are now finalized. We understand that changes may occur at Public Hearings. 6. Rev.3: It appears this request has not been provided. Please provide. Rev.2: New (detail) comments: Please clearly include in the TIS addressing section 2.1 Constrained Roadways. We need to make it clear that even with the proposed additional trips the system is not constrained, but also acknowledge this portion of the Transportation Element and clearly state why it doesn't apply. This is also needed to be explicit regarding TCMA...is it required, is so why...if not why. And finally, the TIS needs to include with all the operational improvements (likely separate section). Response: The TIS has been revised and addresses the reviewer’s request 7. Rev.3: New review comments provided regarding new Operational Impact Analysis provide with this review. Project Generated Traffic 1. Table 1A and Figure 5 display 87 PM peak hour entering project trips and 61 exiting project trips. However, Table 2 displays 61 PM peak hour entering project trips and 87 exiting project trips. The trip distribution in the able appears to be consistent with the trip generation. Please correct the Table 2 descriptions so that 87 trips are shown as entering and 61 trips are shown as exiting. Response: This was only a typo error on Table 2. All traffic assignments were correctly shown by peak direction volume. This error did not affect any computations or conclusions. All traffic distributions, assignments and computations were correct. Project Traffic Distribution 2. When summing the distribution of project trips, Figure 5 only displays a combined total of 45 PM exiting project trips as opposed to the 61 total trips previously determined. Please update the PM exiting trip assignments so that all 61 trips are accounted for. Response: Figure 5 and all computations were corrected accordingly. Also, the retail land use pass-by trips have been included. Note, the project trips have been assigned to the 3 points of access based upon a logical means of ingress/egress for peak season peak demand hours. 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 4 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx 2019 – 2025 Project Build-out Traffic Conditions Table 3 3. The 2025 volume for Vanderbilt Dr north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd was listed as 332. This volume should be 326 if the count was correctly listed as 2020. The 332 value would be the volume obtained if the count were taken in 2019. Please supply the source for the 295 count for Vanderbilt Dr north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd. The count for the closest segment (Vanderbilt Dr from Wiggins Pass Rd to 111th Ave) in the 2019 Collier AUIR was 458. Response: The 2020 peak hour peak direction traffic volume for Vanderbilt Drive (north or VBR) was obtained from the traffic counts obtained in January 2020 which are summarized on Figure 4. As shown, the peak hour peak NB direction volume is 295 vph. The computations in Table 3 and Table 4 were revised to reflect a forecasted 2025 demand of 326 vph peak direction as noted by the reviewer. Operational Analysis 4. The operational analysis summary table displays average speeds, number of stops, and queue lengths. It does not include LOS information. The southbound left movement for the project access is LOS F in all three scenarios that include the project. Synchro calculated the per vehicle delay as 140.7 seconds for vehicles attempting to make this southbound left turn. The northbound and southbound approaches at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Rd. & Southbay Dr. were both shown to operate at LOS F as well, with delays of over 200 seconds at multiple movements. Response: The Synchro Analyses reviewed by staff were based upon the previously proposed and more intense land uses. The analyses have been revised based upon the less intense land uses. The Synchro analyses were performed for the purpose of replicating traffic flow along Vanderbilt Beach Road, which was then used to quantify the benefits achieved by implementing various transportation improvements. In order to more accurately predict the minor side street delay for the project’s full access on VBR and for the intersection of Southbay Dr/Colony Bay Dr (a/k/a Ritz Carlton Dr) and VBR, intersection operational analyses were performed based upon the guidelines of the Highway Capacity Manual and its endorsed software. The HCS results are included in the revised TIS, which has been summarized below. Southbay Drive & Gulf Shore Drive: It was determined that, during peak season peak demand hours and at project build-out, the westbound egress movement at the intersection of Southbay Drive and Gulf Shore Drive will operate at LOS C and a delay of 15.4 sec/veh. The north/south traffic on Gulf Shore Drive is under free-flow conditions. It should be noted that, during peak season peak hour demand periods, drivers associated with One Naples and the adjacent residents can use this as an alternate and more convenient means of egress when other means of egress are subject to elevated levels of delay, as discussed below. Full Access on Vanderbilt Beach Road: It was determined that, during peak season peak demand hours, the southbound left-out egress movement will operate at LOS F and a delay of 73.2 sec/veh, and the northbound egress movement from the parking structure will operate at LOS C. The east/west traffic on Vanderbilt Beach Road is under free-flow conditions and is not affected by the southbound approach's delay. It should be noted that this delay will be incurred by the project's traffic and not the adjacent residents, and there is an alternate means of egress via the intersection of Southbay 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 5 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx Drive and Gulf Shore Drive that operates at LOS C. During peak demand periods, it is expected that some drivers will choose this alternate and more convenient means of egress. Southbay Drive/ Ritz Carlton Drive (a/k/a Colony Bay Dr) & Vanderbilt Beach Road: It was determined that, during peak season peak demand hours, the southbound egress operates at LOS F and a delay of 51.2 sec/veh, and the northbound right-out egress operates at LOS C. The northbound left-out egress operates at LOS E and a delay of 46.1 sec/veh. At project build- out and during peak season peak demand hours, the southbound egress will operate at LOS F and a delay of 106.9 sec/veh, and the northbound right-out egress operates at LOS C. The northbound left-out egress operates at LOS F and a delay of 57.0 sec/veh. The east/west traffic on Vanderbilt Beach Road is under free-flow conditions and is not affected by the minor side streets' delay. It should be noted that motorists have an alternate means of egress via the intersection of Southbay Drive and Gulf Shore Drive, which accommodates a substantially lower traffic demand (i.e., 50% less demand) and has fewer ped/bike conflicts and operates at LOS C. During peak demand periods, it is expected that some drivers will choose this alternate and more convenient means of egress. In those cases where a minor wide street is under STOP sign control and it intersects a major street, it is not uncommon for the minor side street to incur extended periods of delay. Most often, the peak hour minor side street delay is considered acceptable, unless it becomes a safety issue. In this case, the conflicting east/west traffic is traveling at lower speeds and the intersection does not have a history of high-impact crash occurrences. Also, drivers have an alternate means of egress via the intersection of Southbay Drive and Gulf Shore Drive, which accommodates a substantially lower traffic demand (i.e., 50% less demand) and has fewer ped/bike conflicts and operates at LOS C. During peak demand periods, it is expected that some drivers will choose this alternate and more convenient means of egress. 5. Please elaborate on the method used to develop the turning movement volumes (TMVs.) This section states that count data was obtained during the month of January. It then goes on to state that additional congestion can occur in the peak demand month of March. Was any seasonal factor applied to the January counts in order to obtain peak season March volumes? Response: The TMV’s, pedestrian and bicycle data shown on Figures 3 and 4 reflect the higher demand values observed during the peak periods for each intersection under review during the 7-day traffic counts. Therefore, the TIS is based upon a more conservative method of using the peak demand at each intersection (regardless of the time of day the peak demand occurred) and assessing the corridor’s operational performance as if each intersection’s peak demand occurred during the same hour of day. Intersecting side streets vs. intersecting driveways can have different peak demand periods. As an example, the intersection of Vanderbilt Drive & VBR has a peak demand during typical commuter peak hours vs. the parking garage access (mid-day peak) as well as Gulf Shore Court and Bay Colony Drive that serve specific land uses. Per Collier County’s and FDOT’s design methodology, roads and intersections are designed to accommodate averaged peak season conditions not the highest peak month traffic demands. As discussed, and agreed to by County staff, the TIS is based upon demands for average peak season conditions. (i.e., study is based upon 7-day traffic data that was collected in mid-January which reflects average peak season demand). As noted by the reviewer, the TIS states that additional congestion can occur during the month of March, which is based upon observations performed by JMB, during March, 2019, as well as confirmation with the county parking structure attendants that stated the highest parking demand occurs during the month of March. This 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 6 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx statement is simply an acknowledgement to the traffic conditions during March, which does not represent averaged peak season demands. 6. Please clarify the time period that was used for the peak hour in the analysis. The report describes a range that is greater than an hour – 10:30 – 2:30pm on weekends and 10:30 – 5:30pm on weekdays and weekends in March. Response: See response to Comment No. 5. The TIS refers to a wider timeframe of when the peak demand can occur vs. referring to a specific peak hour of the day which could be misinterpreted to suggest that the duration of the demand is only one hour. However, the results of the TIS are based upon the greatest “combined” peak one-hour demand that was observed during the month of January. 7. What was the purpose of the three-day field observation noted on Page 10, first paragraph, of the TIS? Can you please provide the data obtained from the three-day collection period? Were the findings of this three-day field observation used in any way to complete or adjust the analysis calculations? Please explain/clarify. Response: The purpose of the 3-day observation was to validate the data collected in January and to observe the area’s traffic circulation conditions, observe points of conflict, observe the operation of parking garage, and method of collecting payment and traffic entry control. During the 3-day review and at various times of the day, 15-minute approach counts (not TMV counts) were obtained and were only used for consistency affirmation and were not published for inclusion in the TIS. The TIS has been revised to include a more defined description of the 3- day field review. 8. This section states that weekday and weekend congestion occur between the hours of 10:30 and 5:30pm. Figure 4 displays that the weekday peak season traffic occurs between the hours of 11:00 and 5:00pm. Please verify which is correct. Response: The purpose of referring to a range between 10:30 AM to 5:30 PM was to suggest that the peak demand does occur between those time frames and the highest peak hour occurred at different periods of the day depending on the day of the week. The discrepancy was not intentional but is also not critical to the results. Figure 4 was revised accordingly. 9. Please detail the method for assigning project trips to the Synchro analysis for the Scenario 2, 3, and 4 (background with project) files. The background Synchro files contain TMVs that are consistent with those shown in Figure 3. However, the TMVs contained in the background with project files are not consistent with summing the background volumes shown in Figure 3 with the project volumes shown in Figure 5. Response: The Synchro analyses that were reviewed by staff for “with project traffic” were based upon more intense land uses than now being proposed. The Synchro analyses were revised based upon the traffic demands associated with the reduced land use intensities. 10. The Synchro operational analysis TMVs in Scenarios 2, 3, and 4 (background with project) do not reflect the presence of the project trips consistently throughout the network. For example, in Scenario 4 for the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Rd & Parking Garage/Project Access the WBT volume is 381 and the NBL volume is 4 for a total of 385. However, there on only 319 total trips for the westbound approach at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Rd & Gulf Shore Dr. This 319 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 7 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx value is the background volume. The 319 volume needs to be increased to reflect the missing 66 trips. This type of volume correction needs to be made for all such TMVs in the three scenarios including the project. Response: The reviewer refers to 66 trips that were omitted from the weekend “with project traffic” analysis. Those 66 trips were removed because they are associated with existing land uses and activities on the subject property that will be razed or abolished by the proposed project. This was also done for the weekday analysis (i.e., 20 trips for the same movement generated by the same sources that will be eliminated). Figures 3 and 4 have been revised and now depict the trips that are associated with existing land uses/activities that were eliminated as part of the “with” project analysis. Conclusions 11. The report lists six potential traffic control improvements as suggestions to reduce the congestion caused by the parking garage. After the list it goes on to state: The report concludes that implementing these parking management and traffic control measures will significantly reduce queuing conflicts and improve traffic flow along Vanderbilt Beach Road. How was this conclusion reached? The analysis did not include any testing with respect to implementing the six presented parking garage improvements. Please provide additional information such as other project history or studies to support this statement. Response: The statement that there will be a reduction in vehicular queueing and improved traffic flow is based upon an eyewitness account of how the parking garage is operated and how it impacts traffic flow during peak season. The report's Engineer of Record submits his professional opinion, which is founded by 32 years of experience, that implementing the recommended parking garage efficiencies/upgrades will significantly improve traffic flow along Vanderbilt Beach Road. By increasing the processing rate of motorists entering the garage, increasing the length/storage capacity of the left turn lane by 200%, and providing advanced notice to beachgoers regarding the status of available parking spaces, the occurrence and frequency of the back of queue extending beyond the left turn lane will be substantially reduced, which will result in less congestion along Vanderbilt Beach Road. However, because the frequency and degree of interruption varies and is difficult to predict, the attempt to model and accurately quantify the effects of "pre" and "post" efficiency improvements would be too subjective. The tools used to quantify typical intersection operational conditions are not designed to emulate the conditions that occur at the parking garage. Therefore, the study only quantifies operational benefits achieved by other proposed improvements (e.g., traffic signal, roundabout, etc.). The recommended parking garage improvements will result in improved corridor operational conditions that can only be accurately quantified by real-time field measurements. Therefore, the summarized performance comparison of "without" and "with" the recommended upgrades does not include any benefits achieved by the recommended parking garage improvements. Collier County Transportation Planning and Operations and the Parks Department staff agree that these upgrades will reduce the occurrence of congestion caused by the parking garage, and have endorsed the implementation of these improvements. 12. The report lists three improvements that it states are the most effective transportation improvements for the purposes of addressing traffic conflicts caused by pedestrians and bicyclists. The first improvement option (signalizing the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Rd & Gulf Shore Dr) was tested as part of the Synchro operational analysis. However, the analysis did not include any testing with respect to the second or third improvement options. Please provide additional 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 8 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx information such as other project history or studies to support this statement. Response: This comment has been addressed. All of the revised Synchro analyses have been provided to the reviewer. 13. Please detail the method for calculating the results found in the Percent Improved vs Existing column of the Vanderbilt Beach Road Operational Analysis Results table. The table footnote states that this was determined based on a comparison between the westbound weekend queues at Gulf Shore Dr. However, calculating the percent change when comparing the 1,765-value listed in the table for the westbound queue from Scenario 1B to the 1,631 listed for the westbound queue in Scenario 2 results in an improvement of 8% instead of the listed 25. Comparing the 1,765 from Scenario 1B to the 595 for Scenario 3 results in an improvement of 66% instead of the 73% listed in the table. If the full queue value of 1,917 from the Synchro analysis is used instead of the 1,765 shown in the table, the numbers still do not match. In that case comparing 1,917 (adjusted per Synchro output) from Scenario 1B to 1,631 from Scenario 2 results in 15%. Comparing 1,917 (adjusted per Synchro output) from Scenario 1B to 595 from Scenario 3 results in 69%. These still do not match the percent improvement values of 25% and 73% presented in the table. Response: The total westbound queue is not 1,765 feet. As mentioned in footnote No. 1 of the first table, the westbound queue is beyond the VBR/Vanderbilt Drive intersection. Therefore, the total queue is 1,765 feet plus 422 feet (WB queue at VBR/Vanderbilt Dr intersection) or 2,187 feet. The improvement percentages were then calculated based on the comparison to the total westbound queue of 2,187 feet. See revised footnotes on Vanderbilt Beach Road Operational Analysis Results tables located in the Appendix B. ZONING REVIEW - JAMES SABO 11. At the March 3rd NIM, a commitment was made to provide renderings of the size and dimensions of the proposed buildings. Provide renderings of the proposed buildings showing dimensions. Response: This is not a “sufficiency” issue. 12. Development Standards list perimeter setbacks at 15 feet. The setback dimension is not sufficient. The development pattern in the Vanderbilt Beach area is greater than 15 feet. Please consider revising the setback dimension. Response: The actual setbacks vary. The minimum required 15-foot setback is measured from the property line to the parking deck, which is 35 feet in height. The parking deck is setback another 10 feet (and greater) when measured from the edge of pavement, and on average another 17 feet from the travel lane. The tower elements are set back a minimum of 25 feet from the property line, but this only occurs in two locations. In all other areas the setback from the property line to the tower ranges from 34.3 feet to 97.3 feet. The setback to the towers from the edge of pavement ranges from 34 feet to over 100 feet, and the setback to the towers from the travel lanes ranges from 58 feet to over 117 feet. This needs to be considered with the perspective of the prosed ROW enhancements, most particularly the enhanced perimeter landscape buffers, both on the property and proposed in the ROW through a ROW permit and Landscape Maintenance Agreement. We propose to provide a significantly enhanced landscape buffer between the travel lanes, bike lanes, and sidewalks to create an aesthetically pleasing condition for motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians. Examples of buildings in the neighborhood that are three stories(and higher that the 35-foot tall parking deck), with similar setbacks to the ROW and 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 9 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx buffers that are substantially less that what is proposed, include the Barefoot Pelican (5 stories), Vanderbilt Palms (3 stories) the building located east of Sotheby’s at 377 Vanderbilt Beach Road (3 stories). Please see setback and Adjacent Building Separation and Height Exhibit below (and attached). Setbacks for midrise buildings in MU Tract 3 and MU Tract 4 Setbacks for midrise buildings in MU Tract 2 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 10 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx Setbacks to parking deck and tower elements MU Tract 1 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 11 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 12 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx 13. The Development Standards include footnote 3, which allows encroachment into the required setback of 4 feet for cantilevered buildings above the second floor. The footnote for cantilever encroachment is not consistent with the Vanderbilt Beach development pattern. Please consider removing the footnote and cantilever encroachment. Response: We have removed the footnote. 14. For the Development Standards, the zoned building height for Tract 4 is 55 feet, which matches Tracts 2 and 3. For the MU Tracts 2 and 3, the zoned building height was reduced from 65 to 55 feet. However, the actual height remains at 87 feet. Footnote 4 calls for the setback on MU Tract 4 to be 1/2 the zoned building height. Since the zoned height was reduced to 55 feet but the actual height remains at 87 feet, the actual setback for the Barefoot Pelican building was reduced instead of increased. Please consider revising the setback for the Barefoot Pelican building to 1/2 the actual building height of 87 feet, or more than 1/2 the actual building height. Response: The required setback is measured using Zoned Building Height. Therefore, the required setback is 27.5 feet (1/2 of 55 feet). Please see detail below. Note that the Barefoot Pelican Condo (at 61 feet in height) is 4.7 feet from the property line. 15. For the Development Standards for MU Tract 4, the setback along South Bay is 10 feet. A setback of 10 feet at that location will create large shadows on the western portions of the Barefoot Pelican building. Please consider a larger setback for the MU Tract 4 along South Bay to eliminate significant shadowing of the Barefoot Pelican building. Response: The 10’ setback results in a minimal incremental impact to a small fraction of units on the adjacent Barefoot Pelican buildings. This is further mitigated by the fact that 100% of the owner residences are northern and eastern exposure. Therefore, the resulting shade, from a western sunset, casts a shadow on the front doors, not the patios of the owner units. One Naples Midrise Barefoot Pelican 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 13 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx Note that all units in Barefoot Pelican are oriented to the Bay (north and east) COUNTY ATTORNEY REVIEW - HEIDI ASHTON-CICKO 2. The landscape maintenance agreement will need to be a companion item. Please work with Pam Lulich. UPDATE: 4-10-20 Exhibit G, page 3 shows landscaping in the right of way, and quantifies large trees and palm trees. The past direction of the County attorney is no trees in the right of way, only shrubs. Response: We have spoken with Heidi Ashton-Cicko and Jeff Klatzkow. The direction after these discussions was to submit a ROW Permit with the Landscape Maintenance Agreement (LMA) as companion items with the proposed MPUD rezone, thereby allowing the public as well as the Planning Commission and BCC to review and consider the proposed landscape enhancements within the ROW. The County Attorney’s Office does not oppose including trees within the ROW as part of the LMA. We have revised exhibit “G” such that it now only includes the propose enhanced perimeter landscape buffers (within the project boundary) and does not include any of the proposed landscaping within the adjacent ROW. We are providing a separate exhibit which is not a part of the PUD depicting the proposed landscaping within the ROW. We are also preparing the ROW permit application and companion LMA and will submit as soon as it is completed, so that the LMA can be a companion item with the PUD. 3. Exhibit G is not legible at 8 ½ X 11. Please enlarge text. Please note that once it is legible, I may have further comment. 4-10-20 UPDATE: Please delete page 3, trees in the County right of way. Response: Revised as Requested. Note that Exhibit G now only includes the proposed landscape treatment within perimeter landscape buffers (located outside of the ROW within the project boundary). The proposed landscape treatment within the ROW is addressed on the LMA (as part of the required ROW permit). 4. Please address the comments and changes per my 4-10-20 review of the PUD document, to be provided by email by County staff. 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 14 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx Response: Revised as requested. 5. On Master Plan: Development Notes 3.: Please change “w/” to “with”; Preserve note 2.: Please correct the citation; In the legend, please add “EX Existing” Response: Revised as requested. 6. What is the “Southbay Drive Improvement Plan” referenced on page 2 of the Master Plan? Response: Reference removed. 7. Deviation 1: What is a parking podium? The Development standards table refers to a parking deck. Response: Deviation 1 language has been revised, and uses the term parking deck, consistent with the Development Standards Table. LANDSCAPE REVIEW - MARK TEMPLETON 5. Rev. 4: Please remove pages 1 and 2 of Exhibit G. These pages show SDP level of detail that will be reviewed at time of SDP submittal. For the PUD, the buffers are only required to be labeled as is shown on the master plan. Response: We prefer to retain this level of detail, as we have made commitments to our neighbors regarding enhancements including enhanced buffers both within the project and within the adjacent ROW. Landscaping within the ROW is subject to approval of a ROW Permit with a Landscape Maintenance Agreement (LMA). As discussed with the County Attorney’s Office, we will include the ROW Permit application and LMA as companion items with the MPUD. Exhibit G is now entitled “One Naples Enhanced Perimeter Landscape Buffer Planting Plan.” This only depicts perimeter buffer landscaping within the project boundary. It is common to provide an enhanced planting or buffer exhibit, typically as a commitment to neighbors, as a PUD Exhibit. We are providing a separate exhibit entitled “ROW Landscape Exhibit,” which is not a part of the PUD, depicting the proposed landscaping within the ROW. We are also preparing the ROW permit application and companion LMA and will submit as soon as it is completed, so that the LMA can be a companion item with the PUD. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW - PETER SHAWINSKY 1. 5.05.08 D.3.c. Façade/wall height transition elements. Design standards. Please provide further Justification/clarification/illustrations how the high-rise design elements are minimizing the impact on surrounding properties. Rev. #2: Issue remains outstanding. Sufficient justification was not provided on the building design to illustrate how the project will fit in the context of the surrounding properties and neighboring low-rise buildings. Rev. #3: Issue remains outstanding. Justifications for proposed deviations dated 3-27-20. The deviation request did not accurately define LDC 5.05.08.c.i Façade/wall height transition elements. The deviation request in the first paragraph re-wrote the code section adding words to the 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 15 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx requirement. The deviation request is not to re-write the code section and insert words to justify the project design. The deviation should accurately state the code section. Inserting the code section language in the response does not justify the deviation. 2. 5.05.08 D.3.c. Façade/wall height transition elements. Design standards. Exhibit ‘E’ List of Deviations from LDC. Deviation request number 1 on page 9 of exhibit ‘E’ in the first paragraph re-wrote the code section adding words to the requirement. The deviation request is not to re-write the code section and insert words to justify the project design. The deviation should accurately state the code section. 3. 5.05.08 D.3.c. Façade/wall height transition elements. Design standards. Master Plans, Tract 1, dated 3-26-20, page 3, re-wrote the code section adding words to the requirement. The deviation request is not to re-write the code section and insert words to justify the project design. The deviation should accurately state the code section. 4. 5.05.08 D.3.c. Façade/wall height transition elements. Design standards. Exhibit ‘A’ Deviations on page 6 of 13 and List of Deviations from LDC on page 8 of 13 dated 3- 27-20, re-wrote the code section adding words to the requirement. The deviation request is not to re-write the code section and insert words to justify the project design. The deviation should accurately state the code section. 5. 5.05.08 D.3.c. Façade/wall height transition elements. Design standards. The Mid-Rise buildings on Tract 3 and 4 after several conversations did not address the transitional design elements to meet the intent of the code as discussed. Response: Pursuant to our discussion with Peter Shawinsky (5-4-2020), we have revised the deviation language to address the above comments. GENERAL COMMENTS - JAMES SABO 1. Additional comments or stipulations may be forthcoming once a sufficient application has been submitted for review. This correspondence should not be construed as a position of support or non- support for any issues within the petition. Staff will analyze the petition and the recommendation will be contained in the staff report prepared for the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) or Hearing Examiner (HEX). 2. Please be advised that pursuant to the LDC, an application can be considered closed if there has been no activity on the application for a period of six (6) months. That six months period will be calculated from the date of this letter. 3. Please ensure that all members of your review team that may testify before the Hex/CCPC and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) are registered as lobbyists with the county pursuant to the regulations regarding that issue. 4. When addressing review comments, please provide a cover letter outlining your response to each comment. Include a response to all comments. 5. Please put revised dates on all exhibits and in the title block of the Site Plan. The PUD document should include a footer that reflects the project name, petition number, date and page X of Y for the entire document. Documents without this information will be rejected. 6. A partial resubmittal cannot be accepted; please do not resubmit until you can respond to ALL review comments. 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 16 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx 7. Public hearings cannot be held until the Neighborhood Information criteria has been met. In some petition types a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) must be held while other petition types only require the agent to send a letter. All letters and ads must be pre-approved by the county planner. For additional information about the process please contact me. Please note that the NIM must be held at least 15 days prior to the first hearing. As you prepare for that meeting, please be aware of the following items: a) Please provide the required affidavit and its attachments prior to the meeting (in compliance with the LDC); and b) Please post signs to direct attendees to the exact meeting location; and c) Please ensure that there is sound amplification equipment available and working for this meeting. If there is no permanent equipment, please bring a tested/working portable microphone; and d) You must provide a written synopsis of the meeting that includes a list of all questions and answers as well as providing the audio/video tape; and e) Please prepare documents for hand out to all NIM attendees and the public hearing file, that show the differences in the uses that would be allowed in the existing and proposed zoning districts. This request is based upon recent CCPC direction. 8. Note the adopted fee schedule requires payment of additional fees for petitions that require more than four resubmittals; please contact the appropriate staff and resolve issues to avoid this fee. Response: Items 1 – 8 above are acknowledged. We enclose the following: One (1) copy of Response Letter (this is the Response Letter); One (1) copy of MPUD Document (clean and revised); One (1) copy of MPUD Document (redline comparing last submittal 3-27-2020 and 5-29-2020); One (1) copy of Master Plans (revised); One (1) copy of Justification for Proposed Deviations (revised); One (1) copy of Traffic Impact Statement and Appendix B (revised). One (1) copy of Adjacent Building Separation and Height Exhibit (new); One (1) copy of Adjacent building Density Exhibit (new); One (1) copy of One Naples Site Plan (new); and One (1) copy of ROW Landscape Exhibit (new). 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HM File No.: 2016.025 May 29, 2020 Page 17 H:\2016\2016025\WP\MPUD Rezone\Initial Submittal 2019\3rd Resubmittal\JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.docx If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, INC. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP President RJM/sek Enclosures as noted. cc: Keith Gelder w/enclosures (electronically) Richard Yovanovich, Esq. w/enclosures (electronically) Project Team w/enclosures (electronically) 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 2, 2020 11:35 AM To:SaboJames; WilliamsBarry; CarnellSteve Cc:CasalanguidaNick; AshtonHeidi Subject:ONENAPLES PROJECT; REQUEST FOR EMAILS AND ATTACHMENTS Attachments:Submittal 4 - JS 20-05-29 Response Letter.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good morning, please provide a copy of the entire associated email string and any and all attachments regarding the below email: Thanks Tony Anthony P. Pires, Jr., B.C.s. Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wpl-legal.com Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:SaboJames Sent:Thursday, June 4, 2020 9:24 AM To:'Anthony Pires' Cc:BellowsRay; AshtonHeidi; CrotteauKathynell; WilliamsBarry; CarnellSteve Subject:Email chain PL20190000697 One Naples Attachments:FW: One Naples 5/1/20 Comment Letter Tony, The requested email chain is attached. Respectfully, C. James Sabo, AICP Principal Planner Zoning Division James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2708 “Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT.” Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.nPacket Pg. 552Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.nPacket Pg. 553Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:SchmidtCorby Sent:Thursday, June 11, 2020 1:02 AM To:SaboJames Cc:BellowsRay Subject:FW: Naples One Another piece of correspondence for the eventual CCPC packets… Corby Schmidt, AICP Principal Planner From: Support <Support@waterwaysmgmt.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 4:53 PM To: SchmidtCorby <Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Naples One EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear County Commissioners, Planning Commission and Planning Staff, Re: One Naples Development We are writing on behalf of the condominium association for Vanderbilt Palms which is located at 260 Southbay Drive in Naples. As you are likely aware, Vanderbilt Palms and its owners will be the most directly impacted on a number of fronts by the proposed One Naples development project. As a threshold matter, Vanderbilt Palms is not opposed to reasonable, smart development of this area within the bounds of established zoning rules, building codes, and local guidelines that do not conflict with the existing beauty and character of the area. However, after reviewing Stock Development’s recent filings of May 28, 2020, it is clear that one of Vanderbilt Palms’ greatest assets, namely its Bay views that it has enjoyed for the past 35 years, will be completely abolished. Under the current One Naples Plan, our building’s roof top / pool deck area, which currently has gorgeous unobstructed Bay views, will be completely replaced to the north by concrete, steel, and glass from the One Naples Project. This, along with other shared concerns including traffic, density, height and setbacks, puts us in a position where we cannot support the One Naples project as currently proposed. Having said that, the owners of Vanderbilt Palms look forward to coming to the table with our Elected Officials, the One Naples team, and other impacted neighbors, to hopefully come to a common ground on a project that works for our entire community. We thank you in advance and please do not hesitate to contact us with questions. Sincerely, 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 Vanderbilt Palms Board Thank you. Yennisey Hernandez Administrative Assistant. Gulf Coast Management Group. 2180 Immokalee Road Ste. #309 Naples, FL 34110 P: 239-325-4300 F: 239-348-3331 yennisey@gcmg.biz www.gcmg.biz Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:SaboJames Sent:Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:14 AM To:'info@savevanderbiltbeach.com' Cc:BellowsRay; JenkinsAnita; FrenchJames; GuitardDonna; CohenThaddeus; MarcellaJeanne; CasalanguidaNick; CallahanSean; KlatzkowJeff Subject:Public Hearing One Naples PL20190000697 Mr. Buzz Victor, We share your concern regarding the health and safety of citizens who want to take an active role in their local government. The One Naples project is still under review at this time and has not yet been scheduled for a public hearing. As you know, we have instituted virtual meetings as a response to the challenges presented by COVID - 19. Importantly, we currently have social distancing procedures in place, which conform to CDC guidelines, for all in- person County Board meetings. As we move closer to a public hearing date, we will be glad to contact your organization with the strategy that we will employ to ensure that all who wish to speak regarding One Naples have an opportunity. Concerned citizens will have an opportunity to be heard either in-person or virtually during the public hearing. I trust we have addressed your concerns and look forward to communicating with you prior to the hearing date. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Respectfully, C. James Sabo, AICP Principal Planner Zoning Division James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2708 “Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT.” Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Comments to the Letter from Hole Montes dated May 29, 1010 to James Sabo, Principal Planner of Collier County Betty Pircio June 26, 2020 1. Pursuant to the comments made on May 29, 2020 from Hole Montes to James Sabo, it is stated that Collier County’s traffic methodology is designed to “accommodate the averaged peak season conditions and not the highest peak month traffic demands”. Given that One Naples primary demand will be to vacationers who will want to enjoy the beach, the sun and Naples fine restaurants, and that March (according to the confirmation of the parking garage attendants) is the busiest month, why wasn’t March included in the traffic analysis currently submitted? The period of the analysis only included the month of January – the least utilized month of the high season. 2. Again, regarding to these same comments made on May 20, 2020, the level of Service at the intersections of Southbay and Vanderbilt Beach Road going south was at a level of F in January. I am understanding that this is the lowest level of service that can be given to an intersection. Then why is this acceptable? Basically trying to take a left onto Vanderbilt Beach road from the Ritz, from Southbay Drive across from the Ritz and from the Regatta will result in a wait of at least 2 minutes but the analysis does not speak to the increased length of the wait in the peak months of February and March because Collier County allows them not to address the peak times during the peak vacation months in a vacation area. 3. For the third time, the Chief Planner James Sabo, has asked Stock Development to honor their commitment made at the NIM in March of 2020 to provide rend erings of their buildings. At June 30, 2020 this request had not been done. It is extremely difficult to project the impact of this development on the community at large if we are unable to see the impact of these large buildings. 4. The setbacks for the Mid-rise located at the Vanderbilt Lagoon (MU Tract 2) are not the same as the setbacks listed on Schedule B One Naples MPUD Development Standards submitted on May 29, 2020. In the first, the setbacks are 12 feet and in the second the setbacks are zero. Another inconsistency. 5. The height of the parking podium in the letter of May 29, 2020, under Zoning Review, item 12 lists the height at 35 feet. Yet, the Exhibit B One Naples MPUD Development Standards also submitted on May 29, 1020 lists the height of the Parking podium at 45 feet. The inconsistencies of Stock’s submissions make it impossible to judge whether 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) the development is in compliance with the Zoning Code and or just how out of compliance it is. 6. Explain the sentence under item 5 of the May 29, 2020 letter stating that there may be “a potential partial vacation on Southbay drive. This is a public road and should remain public as this road contains the utilities for buildings not on the property of One Naples. 7. The argument under item 12 that the setbacks are not sufficient is that the planting of trees and shrubs will mitigate the 700 linear feet of concrete and 45 feet of height of the parking garage. It goes on to say that they can compare the setbacks of the two 16-foot towers to the setbacks of the 5 stories of Barefoot Pelican and the 3 stories of Vanderbilt Palms. This is like comparing a raison with a watermelon ! Sure, they are both fruits and that is it! There is no comparison! 8. The setback from Vanderbilt Beach Road to the Parking podium is only 15 feet when it should be half the zoned height. The setback from Gulf Shore Drive to the Parking Podium is only 15 feet when it should be half the zoned height. This minimal setback request will result in a caverning effect for all the vehicles and pedestrians attemp ting to navigate these streets. 9. The argument that One Naples is less dense than Barefoot Pelican, Vanderbilt Palms and the Regatta is flawed because the last three have sufficient setbacks and lower building heights which lessen their impact on the neighborhood. You can’t apply that ratio incrementally to any sized building, with any accuracy. (Adjacent Building Density Exhibit) 10. As to item 15, the setback on Tract 4 is only 10 feet which will impede the line of sight from Barefoot Pelican looking towards Gulf Shore Drive. This will cast a shadow on Building 1 of Barefoot Pelican. Stock states that this is mitigated because the r esidents of Barefoot Pelican use their patios (lanais) and not their front walkways to enjoy the scenery. So, in their opinion, the casting of the shadow onto Building One is all right. However, in reality, many of the residents of Building One do sit ou t on their walkways to sun and to read and to socialize which they will be unable to do with the shadow of the adjoining 87-foot-tall mid-rise next door. 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Comments to Exhibit A – One Naples MPUD List of Permitted Uses Submitted May 29, 2020 1. Principal Uses, item 3 lists a Marina “primarily” limited to resident’s use. However, some of the slips may be leased to charter boats. Where are the passengers going to park and unpack their gear while boarding the boats? Why aren’t the number of slips noted in this application? What is the configuration of the docks? How much will they reach out into the Vanderbilt Lagoon? Will these slips be limited to the owners of One Naples Condominiums or can ownership be transferred? After months of reviewing this application, why are there so many unanswered questions. 2. Master Concept Plan Exhibit C-1, page 1 of 3 lists that the max. density is 172 multi- family units, 172 hotel units or any combination…. Why has the exact use of these units not been determined at this time. The hotel use is not allowed. The hotel use will result in a different review process as utilities and traffic will be greater impacted than the residential use, yet this developer is allowed to continue his application with as many possible uses as he requests. Why? His traffic study does not speak to the hotel use. Why- when he is using this use as a possibility? 3. Master Concept Plan Exhibit C-1, page 2 of 3 lists a 15-foot buffer between MU Tract 4 and Barefoot Pelican yet the Development Standards for the MPUD lists ½ zoned height which is not 15 feet. This applicant continues to put forth inconsistent information in his application which makes it impossible to review his submission with any accuracy. The applicant should be required to remove all of the inconsistencies and provide all the information that has been requested by staff. 4. One Master Concept Plan C-1, page 3 of 3, the applicant is asking for a deviation from the architectural standards regarding massing standards to al low the parking deck to be 35 feet in height, yet the MPUD Development standards request 45 feet in height. Again, more inconsistencies making an effective review difficult. Again, on Page 8 of 13, List of Deviations, the request is made for the parking podium to be a maximum of 35 feet in height, when the Development Standards lists the height at 45 feet. They seem to be using the parking garage to lessen the shock of seeing two 208-foot towers in the neighborhood. They are using 700 linear feet of concrete poured into a parking garage to make 2 towers in symmetry with the 1, and 3 and 5 story neighbors. Ludicrous! 5. Exhibit Adjacent Building Separation and height Exhibit shows Barefoot Pelican at a height of 61 feet with 5 floors, the Regatta at 148 feet with 12 floors, Daruma at 23 feet with one floor and Vanderbilt Palms at 51 feet with 2 stories. I do not think they are 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) only including the buildings in their height calculations. I think that they are including structures that are attached to the roofs. Yet in their notes for their buildings, they site 208 feet for the high rises, 87 feet for the Lagoon mid-rise and 77 feet for the Vanderbilt Beach Road midrise. Again, they are fudging the comparisons. That should mean that they will have no structures on the roofs of their buildings. 6. Again, on this plan, they show the Ritz with a height of 215 feet for their 12 stories. The applicant is again including the structures on the roofs of this building but not including the same on his buildings. Or is each floor 18 feet in height 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Criteria for Rezoning One Naples MPUD Betty Pircio Comments 1. Whether the change is consistent with the Future Land Use Map and the Growth Management plan 2. Does this create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 3. Page 3 “The entire neighborhood will benefit from this development”. HOW? 4. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion. 5. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Th ey say it will not reduce light and air because it has “been designed with ample setbacks and open space for this urban development setting” Then why are they meeting their open space requirements on their building roofs as well as off -site? 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. They say One Naples will increase property values. How can that be when the value of our property is in ratio to the use of the beach which will be curtailed by the e xcessive people moving onto this site creating more traffic, less available beach use, shadowing of Barefoot Pelican and Vanderbilt Palms buildings, the caverning effect and the resulting wind, noise and flying debris, etc. 7. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. Yes, Brian Stock is being treated differently than other developers and it appears that Collier County is granting him the ability to submit incomplete applications, withhold information, and not hold him accountable for accuracy in an effort to push through this development. 8. Whether it is possible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Of course. He states that this is a unique parcel and his plan will result in far greater compatibility with the neighborhood than the future use of C-3 zoning. 9. He states that he has a significant investment in the property because the parcels are challenging and that he requires flexibility in order to show the vast improvement in the neighborhood that will result. Other issues – The property is located in the Coastal High Hazard Zone which limits units to 4 per acre. The PUD criteria limit the minimum acreage to “greater than 5 acres and he has 5 acres by including the roads on his property which he does not own. Parcel totals 4.64 acres according to Corby Schmidt. 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) New use of property cannot impact the public facilities more than prior use. Hotel use would increase potable water, sewer, other utilities, sanitary sewer, etc. Schmidt states that the hotel use increases the density of the site and cannot meet these criteria, yet the hotel use remains. Applicant has repeatedly been asked to use the criteria of the Vanderbilt Beach Residential Overlay District to be more compatible with the neighborhood and has refused. The development will not benefit the neighborhood because it will be constructed as an island unto itself. Only their residents will be able to use their amenities. There is nothing here to enhance the neighborhood, yet many things to impact the neighborhood. No reviews by the Environmental Agencies have been provided as to their effect on the Lagoon and the life forms that populate the Lagoon. 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Kenneth Flaska <kenflaska@icloud.com> Sent:Thursday, June 25, 2020 4:58 PM To:SaboJames Subject:One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. Sabo, I live at the Barefoot Pelican which is located adjacent to the One Naples site. A vocal group of elderly snowbirds at our association have been claiming to represent the interests of the entire association. They do not. The majority of residents at the Barefoot Pelican support the stock development . It will eliminate blight that has plagued the area for years. It will also increase our property values. The senior citizens at our association think they are entitled to an unobstructed view of the Ocean even though they do not live on it. They are entrenched and do not like change. We welcome the scaled down version of the stock Development to the Neighborhood. Ken Flaska 271 Southbay # 232 Naples, Flb34198 Sent from my iPhone ken flaska 313-598-1122 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:BellowsRay Sent:Wednesday, June 24, 2020 8:45 AM To:KarlFry Cc:SaboJames Subject:RE: One Naples Hi Karl, Yes, if staff is not copied, then please forward all correspondence that you get for any land use petition to me and I will ensure that the assigned planner receives a copy for any required action and consideration. Also, all correspondence will be included in the back-up for each petition. Thank you. Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT. From: KarlFry <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 8:32 AM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Fw: One Naples fyi... a few of us received this email... have received others previously. do we need to forward each one to you if you are not CC'd? Sometimes that can be a lot of emails... Karl Fry Collier County Planning Commission, District 3 (239) 777-3962 Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 From: richroni gallagher <randrgall@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 4:27 PM To: FryerEdwin; KarlFry; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; HomiakKaren Subject: One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I'm writing to you with regard to Stock's Proposed Development for One Naples. I urge you and your fellow planning board members to consider delaying any public hearing regarding this matter until such time that the public can safely assemble to provide feedback. I understand that over 1000 residents have expressed an interest in expressing themselves in this regard and urge the Planning Board and County Commissioners to afford us such an opportunity. Additionally, I want to relay my concerns with Stock's proposal. I recognize Stock's right to develop the parcels they have accumulated; however, I urge the Planning Board and County Commissioners to refrain from granting any re-zoning and / or variances that would allow Stock to build any bigger, denser or more- traffic "intenser". Specifically: Maintain the existing 100' height restriction and reject the proposed (2) 208' towers Maintain the minimum 30% open space provision and reject the proposed 15% that includes roof-top space Insist on the existing 25' setback (1/2 building height) and reject the proposed 15' for the parking garage and 25' for the 208' towers Hold tight on the existing 25' waterfront setback and reject the ZERO/ lot line setback proposed Enforce the existing 16 dwelling units/ per acre and reject the proposed 31.7 DU/ acre density Continue to prohibit the hotel use on the property. As always, thanks for your consideration. Richard Gallagher 203.733.1724 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:maureen trerice <emtrerice@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, June 25, 2020 12:05 PM To:SaboJames Cc:SheaPaul; KarlFry Subject:One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. If this zoning issue is changed in favor of One Naples, the neighbor hood is going to be very stressed, traffic and beach wise, at that little corner adjacent to the Vanderbilt Beach, especially if the development goes ahead with a hotel in one of the high-rises. The possibility of a hotel puts the traffic even more over the top than it is. I thought two high-rises just under the height of the Ritz hotel and just 25 feet from the curb was creating a canyon like circumstance, on two lane Gulf Shore N. That is unsightly to the whole neighborhood, Including the water view from the lagoon side. Keep the zoning commercial and if they want to build a hotel in keeping with the sensible, original commercial plan, appropriate with the neighborhood, so be it. Thank you Maureen Trerice 8171 Bay Colony Dr. Naples, Fl. 34108 PS. I live further down the beach and would never see this property but feel it is too much on too little and eventually destructive to all neighboring properties. 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:TINA <tinaseely@comcast.net> Sent:Monday, June 29, 2020 9:23 AM To:SaboJames Cc:tina seely Subject:One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners, My name is Tina Seely. I was President of the Association of the Barefoot Pelican last year. I met with Stock developers many times during my time as President. Keith Gelder and Brian Stock always were open, honest and wanted to hear any concerns about One Naples. Happy to have Stock development working to make our community a better and more beautiful place to live. One Naples I believe will be an asset to our corner of Southbay Dr. I bought my condo at 271 SouthBay ten years ago. My Husband and I bought a second unit 5 years ago for our kids. We have two units here at the Barefoot Pelican. I have seen the plans for One Naples and have been excited to see the future in our corner. I am writing to say I support the proposal of Stock Development. Sincerely, Tina Elanges Seely 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:michael <mdslogistics@aol.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 30, 2020 3:22 PM To:SaboJames; ScottTrinity; sawyer.michael@collierCountyFl.gov Subject:Naples One - PUDZ 20190000697 - TIS and Beachwalk Exit & Safety to VBR Attachments:Beachwalk Traffic Consideration and safety.docx EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Jim Sabo, Trinity Scott, and Mike Sawyer: Please see below and attached for comments from our Community at Beachwalk on the TIS and transportation planning. We ask you to develop data for Beach Gate Drive at VBR which was not done on the January 8, 2020 TIS. This should be part of examining effects on Vanderbilt Beach Road from Gulfshore drive to Highway 41 for queuing and safety considerations. Respectfully, Michael Seef mdslogistics@aol.com Tel: 239-596-9135 June 30, 2020 The Beachwalk Community where we have lived for 15 years is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road between Hammock Oak Drive and North Pointe Drive. There is only one entrance - Beach Gate Drive. There are 356 dwellings with approximately 600 cars. We are the largest community situated between Highway 41 and Gulf Shore Drive with direct access only to VBR. There has been no data or analysis in the TIS for traffic moving east from Gulfshore Drive to highway 41. Our waiting times during the season are high and the danger in exiting the community is serious. During the high season between February through May there is unend ing beach traffic both east and west from 7:00 AM – 11: 00 AM and evenings between 4:00 PM to 9:00 PM. with extra beach plus commercial traffic in the morning and beach traffic at evening. It is frequently dangerous to exit the community when making a left turn heading east onto Vanderbilt Beach Road. Another location currently with a single exit to VBR is Regatta with a similar problem. A direct exit to VBR is proposed for One Naples. This would add further to longer queues and danger at Beachwalk and Regatta . When it is impossible to turn left onto VBR, our residents have to turn right, onto Vanderbilt Drive, to 91st avenue, and then to Hwy 41. At 41 one can only turn right and head south making it difficult to go north. Such traffic diversion would be especially unsafe during evacuations when it is necessary to head north. Since the TIS from early January 8th did not consider Beach Gate Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road (VBR) we request that your study be revised to include traffic moving west from Gulfshore Drive to Hwy 41. 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 We also ask you to fully examine growth in traffic with the existing C-1-2-3 commercial zoning. The developer of One Naples indicates that rezoning to PUDZ would have less traffic impact on VBR. No data or analysis was provided to substantiate this. Many viable commercial options exist with current zoning which would not overload VBR. There is additional traffic generated by continuing County growth, including from Naples One, as well as from east of Collier Blvd. - new towns and villages, Golden Gate Estates, and traffic from extensions of VBR and continuing County focus on beach access. What magnitudes from these sources have you used in your analysis of VBR through year 2025 buildout? Traffic analysis for this alternative has not been made. A seasonal percent addition might be used (like the 20% by zoning planning according to Mr. David Weeks). The choice for TIS data on January 8th may not reflect an accurate “seasonal” traffic. Please provide data for previous years showing whether this date or a percentage value is representative for traffic accounting. Considering these concerns and questions overall at this time we believe that the VBR is already a failing road during the season and certainly with additions of One Naples and other traffic growths as indicated above through buildout. Respectfully, Michael Seef mdslogistics@aol.com tel: 239-596-9135 9.A.2.n Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: June 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Diane Carlson <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Wednesday, July 8, 2020 11:24 AM To:SaboJames Subject:Surf Colony 1 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sebo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. We know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. We have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! Diane Carlson __________________________ ---------------------- 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Kim Rosenberg <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Monday, July 6, 2020 4:48 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sebo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. We know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. We have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! __________________________ ---------------------- 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:John C. Pope <jcpope@pfi-grp.com> Sent:Thursday, July 9, 2020 5:23 PM To:SaboJames; Michael-sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov; SchmidtCorby; ShawinskyPeter; SheaPaul; KarlFry; FryerEdwin; Joseph Schmitt; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; HomiakKaren; eastmath@collierschools.com; FialaDonna; SolisAndy; Burt.sanders@colliercountyfl.gov; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Cc:'Brian Maher' Subject:STOCK Development in Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. My wife and I are the owners of a Naples condo that faces north and northwest in the Trieste building in Bay Colony. We have been following the proposed STOCK development with great dismay. While some sort of transformation of this unsightly tract would be welcome, the extent of what is being proposed is unacceptable and unfair to the residents of the Trieste. A main attraction of ownership in our building is the panoramic view of the coastline. The proposed 18 story twin towers would significantly impede our views and be detrimental to the values of our properties. Increased noise from the street below will also hurt our quality of life. Bigger than our aesthetic and financial concerns are the safety issues that this building represents. By the developers own admission, there will be a multifold increase in the traffic on Vanderbilt Beach Road. Today during the season, exiting our building from the garage or the back parking lot onto Vanderbilt Beach Road is treacherous due to people running lights, trying to get around turning cars and avoiding people who are walking. My wife and I are joggers and we have had several dangerous moments trying to cross the road even when the light is in our favor. A significant increase in traffic on this road will surely result in future catastrophes, especially given the average age of the population in Naples. Finally, Vanderbilt Beach Road is the primary east-west artery between Immokalee and Pine Ridge. As a result, there are a large number of emergency vehicles on this road daily. We frequently see them stuck in traffic, trying to find ways to get around the other vehicles. With many more vehicles on this road, this situation would only worsen. Given the above, we strongly oppose the STOCK development proposal. We would not be adverse to a responsible development of this property. However, judging by the sheer quantity and scope of the variances requested along with the environmental factors listed above, we believe this proposal to be an enormous overreach by a developer who is insensitive to the needs of the community. It is hard for us to fathom why responsible county government would allow this proposal to continue to be discussed in its present form. Bonney and John Pope 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Dear Commissioners, I own two units in the Barefoot Pelican Condominiums on South Bay Drive. Because of it’s location, the Barefoot Pelican will be strongly impacted by the construction of the One Naples Development. That said, I can’t wait! The blight that has been allowed to exist on South Bay Drive is an embarrassment that has been ever present for at least the last decade. There is a silent majority of owners at the Barefoot Pelican whom are very excited about this project, welcome it and look forward to it bringing the neighborhood up to the standard of its neighbor, the Ritz Carlton Hotel. Unfortunately there is a small group of snow birds that control our Board of Directors and one resident in particular who has been obnoxiously vocal about their opposition to Stock’s plan. Please don’t let the voice of a few influence you when there are so many who “get it” and are welcoming to this investment which will not only improve the area dramatically, it will raise property values to all our benefit. I would also like to take a moment to compliment Brian Stock on his commitment to working with the neighborhood residents and sincerely caring about how we receive and feel about this investment into our community. There have been countless meetings and attempts to reach out and communicate with us all. The plan has been revised quite a few times as a result of concerns raised in these meetings. It is clear Stock intends on being a good neighbor and interested in proceeding with as little friction as possible. So it is in that spirit that I ask that you vote favorably and allow this much needed investment in our community to move forward and be constructed. If there are any further questions you have or insights I can offer, feel free to contact me. All My Best, Matthew Seely 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Michael Roe <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Thursday, July 9, 2020 5:40 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sebo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. We know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. We have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! __________________________ ---------------------- 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Ronda <admin@remingtonbc.com> Sent:Monday, July 13, 2020 1:49 PM Subject:NAPLES ONE Development Project EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. THE REMINGTON AT BAY COLONY 8665 BAY COLONY DRIVE # 300 NAPLES, FL 34108 Tel: (239) 592-1700 This letter dated July 13, 2020, was prepared to express our opposition to the proposed NAPLES ONE project at the corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive in North Naples. As the elected board of The Remington at Bay Colony, this letter speaks for the seventy-five condominium units located on the beach, and immediately adjacent to the south property line of the Ritz Carlton. The reasons for our opposition are many, but below follows a list of our primary objections: Traffic problems already exist in this corridor. Many times, under current conditions, we have experienced long delays due to the bottle neck of traffic in the area. Cars have been lined up nearly bumper to bumper from the county parking garage to Tamiami Trail. Street ingress is a serious problem, especially during sunset times and when beach enthusiasts start arriving at the beach. Compounding the problem, drivers attempt to circumvent traffic jams by driving through Pelican Bay, thereby causing congestion for walkers, bikers, and local traffic. Frequent bicycle accidents have been a regular occurrence in this area. A traffic study by an independent engineering firm is suggested. The building height is too high, and exceeds current standards for the area. Existing height restrictions within a C-3 district are 100’. The proposed project is to build to a height exceeding 200’. We feel the main building structures would overwhelm the nearby properties. This variance would also set a precedent for height for future redevelopment, which would radically change the character of Vanderbilt Beach and greatly exacerbate the traffic problems already referenced. The proposed development is far too dense when compared to other properties in this area. The number of proposed units and related commercial and support f acilities will 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 exacerbate an already congested traffic problem. This will clearly create a dangerous situation for residents during an evacuation. There should be more open space in an attempt to lower density and allow for aesthetic setbacks that are within the zoning guidelines. In spite of what the development offers their residents for mass transportation to the beach, residents of Naples One will likely walk across the street for their beach activities. Residents of Naples Park often carry their coolers and beach chairs to the beach, and they live much further from the beach than the Naples One Development. The beach at the end of Vanderbilt Beach Road is already overcrowded, causing the Ritz to force their occupants to our beachfront. In the event the commissioners were to approve this development proposal in its current form, they would be setting the wrong precedent for the entire Vanderbilt Beach corridor. We feel strongly that safety in the streets, sidewalks, and parking areas could not be sustainable due to county and utility infrastructure. We already have problems, so please don’t make them worse. The Remington and all of Bay Colony represent a high level of quality of properties and amenities. While we believe an improvement to the a rea in reference (Corner of Vanderbilt Beach Rd and Gulf Shore Dr) would be welcome, we strongly oppose the one as proposed. Stock Development has a stellar reputation of building quality products, but this one appears to be designed based upon maximizing income opportunities. Please consider the long-term effect created by this overly dense development. Thank you for the opportunity to voice our concerns. We trust our local authorities to do the right thing for the majority of residents in this corridor. Respectfully, Remington Board of Directors: James Wagner – President Kim Rosenberg- Vice President Doug Kinsley – Secretary John Beal – Treasurer Michael Ruff - Director 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Robert Feerick <rfeerick@horizonpartnersltd.com> Sent:Wednesday, July 15, 2020 3:36 PM To:SaboJames Subject:One Naples Project Concerns EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo: I am writing in opposition to the One Naples Project. Despite my high opinion of Stock Development and Brian Stock, I believe that this development will be detrimental to our neighborhood. I am a full-time resident of The Trieste condominium building across the street. My opinion is based upon the following issues: Conversion of the property C-3 zoning to residential should only allow 16 units per acre. This development has 31.7 units per acre, almost double the allowed number. The development will create significant additional traffic, noise, and beach use. The setbacks are nowhere near adequate to bring One Naples into a compatible relationship with surrounding properties in the neighborhood. The traffic light at the corner of Gulf Shore and Vanderbilt Beach Road, as proposed, will make it increasingly difficult and dangerous to exit One Naples and make left turns from either end of South Bay Drive. The marina is currently not restricted to residents only in One Naples. This change must be made. I fully agree that this site demands redevelopment, but this should be done in a manner consistent with the existing neighborhood. As currently planned, my opinion is that the development will decrease property values in the surrounding area rather than increase them. The property should be redeveloped in a manner in which to increase property values throughout this section of North Naples. My thoughts are meant to be constructive. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Best wishes, Bob Robert M. Feerick Chairman Horizon Partners, Ltd. 3838 Tamiami Trail N., Suite 408 Naples FL 34103 Milwaukee Office: 9099 West Dean Road Milwaukee WI 53224 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 Direct: 239.261.5989 Main: 239.261.0020 Fax: 239.261.0225 Skype: robert.m.feerick Email: rfeerick@horizonpartnersltd.com 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Jim and Mary Jo Risk 8665 Bay Colony Drive , Unit 1801 Naples, FL 34108 Tel: (765)-427-4863 July 16, 2020 We are writing to express our opposition to the proposed NAPLES ONE project at the corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive in North Naples. The reasons for our opposition are many. Below we have listed our primary objections: • Traffic problems already exist in this corridor. Many times, under current conditions, we have experienced long delays due to the bottle neck of traffic in the area. Cars have been lined up nearly bumper to bumper from the county parking garage to Tamiami Trail. Street ingress is a serious problem, especially during sunset times and when beach enthusiasts start arriving at the beach. Compounding the problem, drivers attempt to circumvent traffic jams by driving through Pelican Bay, thereby causing congestion for walkers, bikers, and local traffic. Frequent bicycle accidents have been a regular occurrence in this area. A traffic study by an independent engineering firm is suggested. • The building height is too high and exceeds current standards for the area. Existing height restrictions within a C-3 district are 100’. The proposed project is to build to a height exceeding 200’. We feel the main building structures would overwhelm the nearby properties. This variance would also set a precedent for height for future redevelopment, which would radically change the character of Vanderbilt Beach and greatly exacerbate the traffic problems already referenced. • Despite what the proposed development offers their residents for mass transportation to the beach, residents of Naples One will likely walk across the street for their beach activities. Residents of Naples Park often carry their coolers and beach chairs to the beach, and they live much further from the beach than the Naples One Development. The beach at the end of Vanderbilt Beach Road is already overcrowded, causing the Ritz to force their occupants to our beachfront. • If this development proposal is to be approved in its current form, they would be setting the wrong precedent for the entire Vanderbilt Beach corridor. We feel strongly that safety in the streets, sidewalks, and parking areas will not be sustainable due to county and utility infrastructure. We already have problems, so please don’t make them worse. The Remington and all of Bay Colony represent a high level of quality of properties and amenities. While we believe an improvement to the area would be welcome, we strongly oppose the one as proposed. Please consider the long-term effect created by this overly dense development. We trust our local authorities to do the right thing for the residents in this corridor. Thank you for the opportunity to voice our concerns. Sincerely, Jim Risk Mary Jo Risk 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Schuman, William <wschuman@mwe.com> Sent:Saturday, July 18, 2020 3:51 PM To:SaboJames; michael-sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov; SchmidtCorby; ShawinskyPeter; SheaPaul; KarlFry; FryerEdwin; Joseph Schmitt; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; HomiakKaren; eastmath@collierschools.com; FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Subject:Opposition to Proposed One Naples Development EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Members of the Collier County Planning Staff, Planning Members, and Commissioners: My wife, Caryn, and I live in the Trieste, Apt. 1804, located in Bay Colony and Pelican Bay. I write to register our strong opposition to the vast and impermissible scope of Stock Development’s proposed One Naples Development. The proposed development will do irreversible economic damage to all of the residents in the area and grievous harm to the character of the Vanderbilt Beach, Bay Colony, and Pelican Bay neighborhoods. Moreover, the unprecedented zoning variances sought by the developer would result in impermissible Spot Zoning. Respectfully, the requested variances cannot lawfully be granted. The variances sought by Stock would put a massively incompatible and obtrusive “square peg” development into an idyllic and peaceful “round hole” community. The proposed seven-fold increase in traffic on Vanderbilt Beach Road and the excessive density of the proposed project would turn a tranquil neighborhood into a crowded and noisy quasi- city. The proposed building heights will greatly impair the views of thousands of peop le who purchased their property in reliance on the integrity of the zoning rules currently in place. The proposed negligible setbacks and impermissibly small public open spaces will change and disrupt the character of the area. Stock’s requested variances would benefit only the requesting owner (Stock) and would disregard entirely the rights of the residents of the area and the general public. It would not create any resources useful to or needed by those who live in the area. To the contrary, the proposed development would do nothing more than accomplish an arbitrary, capricious, unlawful, and uncompensated wealth transfer from the thousands of residents who have relied on the integrity of the current zoning rules to a single developer. Stock is asking the Collier County Planning Staff, Planning Members and Commissioners to engage in unlawful and impermissible Spot Zoning. Spot Zoning is prohibited under the law because it seeks piecemeal rezoning of a small parcel of land to a greater density, leading to disharmony with the surrounding area, and gives preferential treatment to one parcel at the expense of the current zoning plan as a whole, for no necessary reason. Stock’s Spot Zoning request would impermissibly carve out a small site for a far more intensive use and make the site incompatible with the surrounding area and settled expectations of the residents who chose to live in the area in reliance on the current rules. Nor can Stock plausibly claim that it would be unfair to deny its requested zoning variances. A developer that purchases land subject to zoning limitations knows and accepts the risk that the limitations will remain in place. Developers often acquire land subject to and contingent upon the developer’s ability to obtain zoning variances needed to build the desired project. Stock knew when it purchased the land that it was taking the risk that it could not build the proposed project under the zoning rules currently in force. 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 As the Planning Staff, Planning Members, and Commissioners consider Stock’s request for substantial variances that would severely harm most everyone in the affected neighborhoods, please be guided by your sacred, fiduciary duty to protect the residents of these communities. A tasteful, modest development of appropriate scale, consistent and compatible with current zoning requirements, can be an enhancement to the area. But allowing Stock to undertake a project with anything close to the currently proposed scope would impermissibly inflict substantial damage to the people that the Planning Staff, Planning Members, and Commissioners are duty bound to protect. Respectfully, /S/ William P. Schuman Trieste, Apt 1804 8787 Bay Colony Drive Naples, Florida 34108 Mobile: 847-951-2706 ******************************************************************************************************************* This message is a PRIVATE communication. This message and all attachments are a private communication sent by a law firm and may be confidential or protected by privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the information contained in or attached to this message is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Our Privacy Policy explains how we may use your personal information or data and any personal information or data provided or made available to us. Thank you. ******************************************************************************************************************* Please visit http://www.mwe.com/ for more information about our Firm. 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Schuman, William <wschuman@mwe.com> Sent:Saturday, July 18, 2020 3:51 PM To:SaboJames; michael-sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov; SchmidtCorby; ShawinskyPeter; SheaPaul; KarlFry; FryerEdwin; Joseph Schmitt; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; HomiakKaren; eastmath@collierschools.com; FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Subject:Opposition to Proposed One Naples Development Dear Members of the Collier County Planning Staff, Planning Members, and Commissioners: My wife, Caryn, and I live in the Trieste, Apt. 1804, located in Bay Colony and Pelican Bay. I write to register our strong opposition to the vast and impermissible scope of Stock Development’s proposed One Naples Development. The proposed development will do irreversible economic damage to all of the residents in the area and grievous harm to the character of the Vanderbilt Beach, Bay Colony, and Pelican Bay neighborhoods. Moreover, the unprecedented zoning variances sought by the developer would result in impermissible Spot Zoning. Respectfully, the requested variances cannot lawfully be granted. The variances sought by Stock would put a massively incompatible and obtrusive “square peg” development into an idyllic and peaceful “round hole” community. The proposed seven-fold increase in traffic on Vanderbilt Beach Road and the excessive density of the proposed project would turn a tranquil neighborhood into a crowded and noisy quasi- city. The proposed building heights will greatly impair the views of thousands of people who purchased their property in reliance on the integrity of the zoning rules currently in place. The proposed negligible setbacks and impermissibly small public open spaces will change and disrupt the character of the area. Stock’s requested variances would benefit only the requesting owner (Stock) and would disregard entirely the rights of the residents of the area and the general public. It would not create any resources useful to or needed by those who live in the area. To the contrary, the proposed development would do nothing more than accomplish an arbitrary, capricious, unlawful, and uncompensated wealth transfer from the thousands of residents who have relied on the integrity of the current zoning rules to a single developer. Stock is asking the Collier County Planning Staff, Planning Members and Commissioners to engage in unlawful and impermissible Spot Zoning. Spot Zoning is prohibited under the law because it seeks piecemeal rezoning of a small parcel of land to a greater density, leading to disharmony with the surrounding area, and gives preferential treatment to one parcel at the expense of the current zoning plan as a whole, for no necessary reason. Stock’s Spot Zoning request would impermissibly carve out a small site for a far more intensive use and make the site incompatible with the surrounding area and settled expectations of the residents who chose to live in the area in reliance on the current rules. Nor can Stock plausibly claim that it would be unfair to deny its requested zoning variances. A developer that purchases land subject to zoning limitations knows and accepts the risk that the limitations will remain in place. Developers often acquire land subject to and contingent upon the developer’s ability to obtain zoning variances needed to build the desired project. Stock knew when it purchased the land that it was taking the risk that it could not build the proposed project under the zoning rules currently in force. As the Planning Staff, Planning Members, and Commissioners consider Stock’s request for substantial variances that would severely harm most everyone in the affected neighborhoods, please be guided by your sacred, fiduciary duty to protect the residents of these communities. A tasteful, modest development of appropriate scale, consistent and 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 compatible with current zoning requirements, can be an enhancement to the area. But allowing Stock to undertake a project with anything close to the currently proposed scope would impermissibly inflict substantial damage to the people that the Planning Staff, Planning Members, and Commissioners are duty bound to protect. Respectfully, /S/ William P. Schuman Trieste, Apt 1804 8787 Bay Colony Drive Naples, Florida 34108 Mobile: 847-951-2706 ******************************************************************************************************************* This message is a PRIVATE communication. This message and all attachments are a private communication sent by a law firm and may be confidential or protected by privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the information contained in or attached to this message is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Our Privacy Policy explains how we may use your personal information or data and any personal information or data provided or made available to us. Thank you. ******************************************************************************************************************* Please visit http://www.mwe.com/ for more information about our Firm. 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Harriet & Don Young <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, July 21, 2020 10:37 AM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sebo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. We know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. We have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! Harriet & Don Young__________________________ ---------------------- 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) The Regatta Condominium Association and Save Vanderbilt Beach Road Coalition _ The 22 July Staff Conference List of Questions LDC Zoning Density Rules 4.07.02.B - Design Requirements _ External relationships. 1. Development within a PUD district shall be compatible with established or planned uses of surrounding neighborhoods and property. 2. The PUD shall provide protection of the development from potentially adverse surrounding influences and protection of the surrounding area from potentially adverse influences generated by or within the PUD. Fences, walls, or vegetative screening at the boundaries of PUD districts shall be provided, at a minimum, in accordance with the landscaping/ buffering requirements of section 4.06.00 to protect residents from undesirable views, lighting, noise, or other adverse off-site influences, or to protect residents of adjoining districts from similar possible influences from within the PUD district. 4.07.02.B.D. - Residential density. 3. The BCC may lessen density or intensity of development when it has been determined that development to the maximum density or intensity permissible in this section would: a. Create inconvenient or unsafe access to the PUD; or b. Create traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin or lead to the PUD; or c. Place a burden on parks, recreational areas, schools, and other facilities which serve or are proposed to serve the PUD; or d. Be in conflict with the intent or provisions of the GMP; or e. Create a threat to property or incur abnormal public expense in areas subject to natural hazards; or f. Be incompatible or inconsistent with surrounding neighborhoods or areas. Staff Questions General Questions _ 1.What is the status and timing of the staff report? Does the new MCP “Reset the clock? Will the Stuart Opinion Letter, Ave. Building Ht. And Letter of Opposition be included in the packet? Page of 1 3 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2.Will the staff report incorporate alternative development standards and conditions for approval (density, height, setback, additional mitigation, circulation infrastructure, etc.) 3.One what criteria will the street vacation be evaluated? 4.Process _ Given the 1400 + people that oppose the project as currently designed, will there be a dedicated hearing without other agenda items. Comprehensive Planning and The Growth Management Plan 1.Vanderbilt Tourist Overlay District - the name and basis relates to a tourist leisure hospitality use with a marina, but no Hotel information and Marina information is provided. •Question: Has hotel data and analysis been asked for but not provided by the applicant? •Question: Has marina data and analysis been asked for but not provided by the applicant? •Question: Can an application be approved for new uses without data and analysis being provided? 2.The amendment called for 15% open space, of which the bulk of the open space will be private roof-top recreation that does not provide for development intensification relief, buffering or drainage. •Question: Is the Applicant still requesting 15% open space? •Question: Has Collier Co. previously approved a 50% open space text amendment reduction? Or LDC deviation? If so, what project and what basis of approval? 3.In reference to Corby Schmidt’s 10 July letter to the Applicant, has or is staff undertaking a public benefits analysis for the comprehensive plan amendments and new overlay district (such as comparing the costs of increased density and traffic congestion to economic or infrastructure benefits) and will be making a recommendation for approval or denial? 4.In reference to Corby Schmidt’s 10 July letter to the Applicant, has or will staff be undertaking a Collier GMP and State Community Planning Act internal consistency review? PD Zoning and Site Planning 1.HMA Response Letter dated 05/20/20 page 8 Question 12 the parking garage is 35-ft. Yet Ex. B Accessory Uses calls out a 40-ft. And 45-ft standard. What is the actual height request? 2.Marina - the proposed 55 - 99 slip marina language “primarily limited to use by residents and guests”. A 99 slip marina for a 172 unit residential or hotel project is way over what is needed for the number of hotel rooms or condos being requested. •Question: Has staff addressed the fact that the above language will permit a commercial marina facility for non-residents to own or rent slips, thereby creating additional traffic and other impacts that have not been addressed? 3.Applicants Building Height Information - What methods were used by the Applicant in estimated neighborhood building heights in that, for Barefoot Pelican’s 48-ft (which includes mechanics appurtenances), the Applicant stated 61-ft. Do the Applicant’s height estimates include roof top appurtenances? Page of 2 3 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Transportation and Traffic 1. Comp Plan Transportation Element policies 5.1 and 7.2 require analysis of long-term traffic conditions and impact to adjacent neighborhood streets. No such study has been undertaken, nor plan of improvements to address roadway operations currently exists or has been committed to. It also appears that inadequate parking capacity in the area is a part of the congestion problem. •Question: To what extent do the public roads within the development site serve parking needs? •Question: Will the County develop and implement plans to address existing and future traffic circulation and parking deficiencies? 2. Has or will staff request from the applicant a clear and professionally established analysis that substantiates the effectiveness of the applicant’s proposed mitigation, and make that analysis available for public review? 3. Given historic traffic congestion problems along the subject roadways which spills into the nearby neighborhoods (per indications of residents of the nearby neighborhoods), can staff find the application’s analysis complete without the information outlined in the above questions one and two? 4. Has or will staff require the applicant to demonstrate validation of, and provide Synchro and Sim-Traffic input files for their project review process and will these files be made available for public review? 5. LDC section 4.07.02.3 indicates site access provisions are a key consideration in development approval. In the traffic scenario testing, it is not clear that all entering and exiting traffic has been accounted for, nor are delays reported. The reported queues are long, suggesting delays will be very long. •Question: Has or will staff require the applicant to more clearly analyze and address site access and egress provisions for the impacted area? 6. The analysis documentation submitted is not complete. There is no indication of how bike and pedestrian movements were coded into each scenario, how well Synchro or Sim- Traffic deals with pedestrians and bicycles, and if and on what basis staff agrees that signalization of the VBR/Gulf Shore Blvd intersection is the best solution? •Question: Can the application be found sufficient without this information? Page of 3 3 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) ‐ 1 ‐ Memorandum To: Mr. Mike Sawyer, Transportation Planner, Collier County Cc: Mr. Greg Stuart, Stuart Land Design From: W.E. Oliver, P.E., PTOE Subject: One Naples Development Proposal Review of Traffic Studies Date: July 1, 2020 Mr. Sawyer, As you are aware, I have been retained by the Regatta Condominium Association to review traffic aspects of the proposed One Naples development. In response to your request for an “advance agenda” for a video‐conference, please find my comments regarding the traffic impact studies submitted by the applicant to Collier County. In summary, there remain issues that are unaddressed, and the documentation of analysis and issues that are addressed is lacking. Collier County should request that the applicant provide information as discussed below, or be prepared to respond to these issues with supporting analyses. Land Use Plan Amendment Request An amendment to the land use plan to allow development that will more than triple the existing trip generation for a given parcel of land inevitably sets a precedent for other parcels of land to request similar intensity increases. Consideration of a land use plan amendment that sets precedent for greater intensities, therefore, should also consider the implications of the change, and similar changes for which it sets precedent, on the existing and planned transportation network. The existing road network, specifically Vanderbilt Beach Road, is acknowledged by the applicant to experience high degrees of congestion on weekdays as well as weekends during peak months under existing land uses. This area has not been developed to its full traffic generation potential, as the adopted 2040 Transportation Plan (which by state law is to be consistent with the Land Use Plan) projects an approximate 25 percent increase in traffic volumes. This will create extreme congestion on Vanderbilt Beach Road, and is also likely to press more traffic into the adjacent Naples Park neighborhood. No analysis of long‐term traffic conditions or adjacent neighborhood streets has been undertaken for this land use plan amendment, as is required by Transportation Element Policies 5.1 and 7.2. No plan of improvements to address roadway operations on Vanderbilt Beach Road exists or has been committed to by the appropriate implementing parties. As a condition of this development, will the County develop and implement a plan to address existing parking and traffic circulation deficiencies? January 8,2020 Traffic Impact Statement for One Naples Prepared for purposes of addressing the County’s concurrency policies, this report provides a very simple comparison of current plus development peak hour traffic volumes to a generalized estimate of roadway capacity. The roadway capacity value used would reflect near‐ideal (for cars) operating conditions (e.g. not affected by pedestrians crossing the road). Review of traffic count data indicates DRAFT9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) ‐ 2 ‐ very consistent traffic volumes for many hours of the day, suggesting that traffic flow (and therefore the traffic count data) is constrained by the existing road capacity. March 27, 2020 Traffic Impact Statement for One Naples This report concludes that operational issues are created by the parking garage and the three‐way stop control at Gulf Shore Drive, and recommends changes that will produce some beneficial results. These improvements should be implemented whether or not One Naples is developed. However, it seems the fundamental issue is that the parking garage fills, and there is no room for additional vehicles to enter the garage. The extent to which the proposed solutions yield beneficial results, particularly in the case of the parking garage, are assumed and not professionally established. Consequently, the question before you is whether staff will request from the applicant a clear and professionally established analysis that substantiates the effectiveness of these potential benefits. The analysis relies on Sim‐Traffic software. Sim‐Traffic has substantial limitations. There is no indication in the documentation regarding model validation. For example, where the report acknowledges severe congestion associated with the parking garage entrance, the Sim‐Traffic reports do not reflect or validate this issue. Further, Sim‐Traffic will only report queues as long as the lane in which they occur, so if the network is coded with short links, queue lengths will be under‐reported. In addition, if software default parameters are used, gaps between vehicles in queue are too small, leading to queues that are too short and turn lanes do not block through lanes as they do in “real‐life”. Given historic traffic congestion problems along the subject roadways, a second question is whether staff can find the analysis complete without this information. There is no clear statement of the demand traffic volumes on which the analysis is based, or documentation of the road network coding, or how pedestrian traffic was addressed or coded. The report provided does not provide indications of delay by intersection movement. It is accepted professional practice that the applicant should provide the associated Synchro input files for review. Will the County request and provide these files for review? Land Development Code section 4.07.02 3. Indicates “The BCC may lessen density or intensity of development when it has been determined that development to the maximum density or intensity permissible in this section would: a. Create inconvenient or unsafe access to the PUD; or b. Create traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin or lead to the PUD;” In Appendix B, Scenarios 3 and 4, with project, the results for the Gulf Shore Ct site access location to Vanderbilt Beach Rd are not provided. Where they are reported, site exit queues appear to be long for site egress, suggesting very long delays. Will the County require the applicant to more clearly analyze and address site access and egress provisions? The March 27, 2020 Traffic Impact Statement indicates a reduction in average vehicle speeds in the network analyzed from 17 mph (with roundabout) and 16 mph (with signal) without the proposed development to 14 mph with the proposed development, which contradicts the general conclusion expressed in the applicant’s traffic report that “One Naples will not have a negative impact upon the surrounding road network”. The applicant’s own analysis indicates One Naples will aggravate existing DRAFT9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) ‐ 3 ‐ traffic operational issues, and additional analysis and better documentation of the analyses submitted are needed. The analysis recommends implementation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Rd at Gulf Shore Drive without providing justification or discussion of why this is recommended. Traffic signals cultivate a “drive fast then stop and wait” style of driving, whereas roundabouts cultivate a slower, more uniform speeds ‐‐ “calmer” traffic flow ‐‐ which better fits the character and safety needs of the area with the heavy pedestrian and bicycling activity. Final questions are whether staff will be asking how pedestrian and bicycling movements were coded, if and on what basis staff agrees signalization is the best solution, and whether you can find the application sufficient without this information. Unaddressed is to what extent beach parking is facilitated on the property to be developed, and if replacement parking can be found. In summary, the proposed development will increase the density and intensity of development in the area in spite of public infrastructure (roads and public parking) not being able to acceptably accommodate existing demands. Neither the County nor the applicant appear to have any substantive plan to improve traffic and access conditions. Finally, the applicant has not submitted credible analysis that clearly documents the conditions and effectiveness of the proposed solutions. In light of these shortcomings in planning, approval of the plan amendment request is not warranted. F:\WEO‐PE\Projects\127.01‐Regatta HOA\5. Docs\20200701 Sawyer Memo.docx DRAFT9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Nada <nadas105@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, July 23, 2020 2:01 PM To:Nada Subject:naples one development grievance letter THE REMINGTON AT BAY COLONY 8665 BAY COLONY DRIVE # 300 NAPLES, FL 34108 Tel: (239) 592-1700 This letter dated July 13, 2020, was prepared to express our opposition to the proposed NAPLES ONE project at the corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive in North Naples. As the elected board of The Remington at Bay Colony, this letter speaks for the seventy-five condominium units located on the beach, and immediately adjacent to the south property line of the Ritz Carlton. The reasons for our opposition are many, but below follows a list of our primary objections: • Traffic problems already exist in this corridor. Many times, under current conditions, we have experienced long delays due to the bottleneck of traffic in the area. Cars have been lined up nearly bumper to bumper from the county parking garage to Tamiami Trail. Street ingress is a serious problem, especially during sunset times and when beach enthusiasts start arriving at the beach. Compounding the problem, drivers attempt to circumvent traffic jams by driving through Pelican Bay, thereby causing congestion for walkers, bikers, and local traffic. Bicycle accidents have been a regular occurrence in this area. A traffic study by an independent engineering firm is suggested. • The building height is too high, and exceeds current standards for the area. Existing height restrictions within a C-3 district are 100’. The proposed project is to build to a height exceeding 200’. We feel the main building structures would overwhelm the nearby properties. This variance would also set a precedent for height for future redevelopment, which would radically change the character of Vanderbilt Beach and greatly exacerbate the traffic problems already referenced. • The proposed development is far too dense when compared to other properties in this area. The number of proposed units and related commercial and support facilities will exacerbate an already congested traffic problem. This will clearly create a dangerous situation for residents during an evacuation. • There should be more open space in an attempt to lower density and allow for aesthetic setbacks that are within the zoning guidelines. • In spite of what the development offers their residents for mass transportation to the beach, residents of Naples One will likely walk across the street for their beach activities. Residents of Naples Park often carry their coolers and beach chairs to the beach, and they live much further from the beach than the Naples One Development. The beach at the end of Vanderbilt Beach Road is already overcrowded, causing the Ritz to force their occupants to our beachfront. • In the event the commissioners were to approve this development proposal in its current form, they would be setting the wrong precedent for the entire Vanderbilt Beach corridor. We feel strongly that safety in the streets, sidewalks, and parking areas could not be sustainable due to county and utility infrastructure. We already have problems, so please don’t make them worse. The Remington and all of Bay Colony represent a high level of quality of properties and amenities. While we believe an improvement to the area in reference (Corner of Vanderbilt Beach Rd and Gulf Shore Dr) would be welcome, we strongly 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 oppose the one as proposed. Stock Development has a stellar reputation of building quality products, but this one appears to be designed based upon maximizing income opportunities. Please consider the long-term effect created by this overly dense development. Thank you for the opportunity to voice our concerns. We trust our local authorities to do the right thing for the majority of residents in this corridor. Respectfully Yours, Sam and Nada Simon 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Traffic Engineering / Transportation Planning P.O. Box 10361 Tampa, Florida 33679 bill@weo-pe.com / (813) 748-9188 July 21, 2020 Ms. Anita Jenkins, Director, Planning and Zoning Mr. James Sabo, Principal Planner Ms. Trinity Scott, Transportation Planning Manager Mr. Michael Sawyer, Principal Traffic Planner Collier County Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Subject: Neighborhood Letter of Objection to Proposed One Naples Development Dear Ms. Jenkins, et al., W.E. Oliver, P.E., LLC, has been retained by the Regatta at Vanderbilt Beach condominium associations and the Save Vanderbilt Beach Road coalition to review transportation aspects of the proposed One Naples development. I have reviewed two submitted traffic/transportation analysis documents listed below, in the context of various Collier County Comprehensive Plan policies and Land Development Code requirements. The documents reviewed are as follows: January 8, 2020 “Traffic Impact Statement for One Naples” by JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., and March 27, 2020 “Traffic Impact Statement for One Naples” by JMB Transportation Engineering, and its March 25, 2020 “Appendix B Vanderbilt Beach Road Operational Analysis” by TR Transportation Consultants. In summary, the submitted documents do not address the information requirements of the Comprehensive Plan and do not provide adequate documentation of the analysis undertaken at a level that County staff can verify the applicant’s conclusions. It appears that substantial congestion recurs in this area of Vanderbilt Beach Road and that the addition of increased traffic from the proposed development, or from other future developments One Naples would serve as a precedent for, will worsen the problems. While solutions have been proposed, there is no documentable substantiation that the proposed solutions will resolve the issues. Under these conditions, we request that County staff recommend denial of the pending requests. Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code Inadequacies Transportation Element Policies 5.1 and 7.2 require analysis of long-term traffic conditions and adjacent neighborhood streets. The submitted analyses deal only with Vanderbilt Beach Rd from Gulf Shore Drive to Vanderbilt Drive using a short-term analysis horizon of 2025. A concurrency-based criteria of impact has been applied to limit the study area, but this 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) July 21, 2020 Page 2 of 4 application is not a concurrency application. The increased site intensity request is of concern to the Naples Park residential community and should be addressed. Further, the long-range transportation plan indicates a 25 percent traffic volume increase on Vanderbilt Beach Rd under current land use plan assumptions. Finally, inadequate parking for beach-goers at the County parking garage has been identified in the above studies as a leading cause of congestion. However, no plan of improvements to address roadway operations or parking needs on Vanderbilt Beach Road exists or has been committed to by the appropriate implementing parties. Some mitigating strategies have been proposed, but there is no verifiable analysis that demonstrates the effectiveness of these solutions. In the absence of a plan to address the inadequate infrastructure, how can the County responsibly approve the proposed intensification? LDC section 4.07.02.3 indicates site access provisions are a key consideration in development approval. In the traffic scenario testing of the “Appendix B” report, it is not clear that all entering and exiting traffic has been accounted for, nor are delays reported. The reported queues are long, suggesting delays will be very long. The queue lengths reported in the tables on the first page of this document cannot be found in the supporting Sim-Traffic output reports. Further, Sim-Traffic overestimates capacity at Stop controlled intersections compared to the 2016 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM6), and thus would underestimate delays and queue lengths. The traffic analyses indicate queues of 1,436 feet extending from Gulf Shore Dr eastward in the 2025 “improved” scenario, which extends to the Regatta driveway. It’s not clear how additional congestion caused by the new site entrance leg at the parking garage entrance affects this queue. Will staff require the applicant to provide analysis files that can be reviewed by the public that more clearly analyzes site access and egress provisions for the impacted area? Collier County’s “Procedures and Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies” provide for the ability for the applicant to address parking issues. Unaddressed in any report is to what extent beach parking is facilitated on the property to be altered, and if replacement parking can be found. January 8,2020 Traffic Impact Statement for One Naples Prepared for purposes of addressing the County’s concurrency policies, this report provides a very simple comparison of current plus development peak hour traffic volumes to a generalized estimate of roadway capacity. Since it addresses concurrency, this report isn’t necessarily applicable to land use plan amendment issues and should not be used to justify exclusion of roadway network elements from consideration. 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) July 21, 2020 Page 3 of 4 The roadway capacity value used for Vanderbilt Beach Rd in this study would reflect near-ideal operating conditions (e.g. not affected by heavy pedestrian volumes crossing the road). Review of traffic count data indicates very high pedestrian volumes crossing Gulf Shore Dr and Vanderbilt Beach Rd, which detracts from roadway capacity. While this “concurrency” study concludes that traffic conditions are acceptable, acknowledgement of, and proposals to mitigate existing traffic congestion in later documents contradict the conclusions of this study. March 27, 2020 Traffic Impact Statement for One Naples The report begins with a statement that One Naples will not have a negative impact upon the surrounding road system. However, the analysis acknowledges that the proposed development has the potential to generate from three to four times the traffic that is currently generated by the site, and identifies a reduction in average vehicle speeds in the network analyzed from 17 mph (with roundabout) and 16 mph (with signal) without the proposed development to 14 mph with the proposed development. These indications contradict the stated general conclusion expressed that One Naples will not have significant impacts. In its acquiescence that operational issues exist, created by the parking garage and the three- way stop control at the Vanderbilt Beach Drive/Gulf Shore Drive intersection, recommendations are made for changes that may produce beneficial results. These improvements should be implemented whether or not One Naples is developed. However, the extent to which these improvements yield beneficial results, particularly in the case of the parking garage entrance intersection where the primary One Naples site access is proposed, is not established. The analysis relies on Sim-Traffic software. Sim-Traffic has substantial limitations and cannot model the interaction between the left-turn entrance to the garage and the toll collection operation. There is no documentation regarding model validation. For example, where recorded video and the report acknowledges substantial congestion associated with the parking garage entrance, the Sim-Traffic reports do not reflect or validate this issue. There is no clear statement of the demand traffic volumes on which the analysis is based, or documentation of the road network coding in the model. The report provided does not provide indications of delay by intersection movement. There is no documentation of how the queue lengths reported in summary tables were derived from the Sim-Traffic output reports. In the analysis of the site’s primary entrance opposite the parking garage entrance in the proposed improvement scenario (“Scenario 4 (Background + Project)) a movement “B11” is indicated. This appears to be a software “glitch”, as there is no movement named “B11” in normal traffic engineering parlance. The County should insist the applicant provide the associated Synchro input files for review, and the applicant should be concerned that the site’s primary access drive operate effectively. 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) July 21, 2020 Page 4 of 4 The analysis recommends implementation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Rd at Gulf Shore Drive over a roundabout without providing justification or discussion of why this is recommended. Traffic signals cultivate a “drive fast then stop and wait” style of driving, whereas roundabouts cultivate a slower, more uniform speeds -- “calmer” traffic flow -- which better fits the character and safety needs of the area with the heavy pedestrian and bicycling activity. As indicated above, Sim-Traffic overestimates capacity at Stop controlled intersections when compared to the 2016 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM6), and thus would underestimate delays and queue lengths. In addition, Sim-Traffic underestimates capacity at single-lane roundabouts when compared to HCM6, and thus would overestimate delays and queues. The traffic analysis summary tables indicate queues of 1,436 feet extending from Gulf Shore Dr eastward in the 2025 “improved” scenario, which extends to the Regatta driveway. Queues of this length cannot be considered acceptable and, if the relevant information that is generated by Sim- Traffic was provided, would likely indicate levels of service below adopted standards. In light of the above, a more thorough review of the impacts of One Naples must be undertaken and solutions to the existing congestion and potential future congestion must be developed and committed to before a recommendation of approval is provided by staff. If you have any questions regarding the above information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very Truly Yours W.E. Oliver, P.E., LLC William E. Oliver, P.E., PTOE President Cc: Ms. Sarah Spector, RA Law Mr. Craig Kasper, Regatta Mr. Greg Stuart, Stuart Urban Planning F:\WEO-PE\Projects\127.01-Regatta HOA\5. Docs\WEO-PE Opinion Letter.docx 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Jim and Mary Jo Risk 8665 Bay Colony Drive , Unit 1801 Naples, FL 34108 Tel: (765)-427-4863 July 16, 2020 We are writing to express our opposition to the proposed NAPLES ONE project at the corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive in North Naples. The reasons for our opposition are many. Below we have listed our primary objections: • Traffic problems already exist in this corridor. Many times, under current conditions, we have experienced long delays due to the bottle neck of traffic in the area. Cars have been lined up nearly bumper to bumper from the county parking garage to Tamiami Trail. Street ingress is a serious problem, especially during sunset times and when beach enthusiasts start arriving at the beach. Compounding the problem, drivers attempt to circumvent traffic jams by driving through Pelican Bay, thereby causing congestion for walkers, bikers, and local traffic. Frequent bicycle accidents have been a regular occurrence in this area. A traffic study by an independent engineering firm is suggested. • The building height is too high and exceeds current standards for the area. Existing height restrictions within a C-3 district are 100’. The proposed project is to build to a height exceeding 200’. We feel the main building structures would overwhelm the nearby properties. This variance would also set a precedent for height for future redevelopment, which would radically change the character of Vanderbilt Beach and greatly exacerbate the traffic problems already referenced. • Despite what the proposed development offers their residents for mass transportation to the beach, residents of Naples One will likely walk across the street for their beach activities. Residents of Naples Park often carry their coolers and beach chairs to the beach, and they live much further from the beach than the Naples One Development. The beach at the end of Vanderbilt Beach Road is already overcrowded, causing the Ritz to force their occupants to our beachfront. • If this development proposal is to be approved in its current form, they would be setting the wrong precedent for the entire Vanderbilt Beach corridor. We feel strongly that safety in the streets, sidewalks, and parking areas will not be sustainable due to county and utility infrastructure. We already have problems, so please don’t make them worse. The Remington and all of Bay Colony represent a high level of quality of properties and amenities. While we believe an improvement to the area would be welcome, we strongly oppose the one as proposed. Please consider the long-term effect created by this overly dense development. We trust our local authorities to do the right thing for the residents in this corridor. Thank you for the opportunity to voice our concerns. Sincerely, Jim Risk Mary Jo Risk 9.A.2.o Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: July 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Richard Dubois <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Saturday, August 1, 2020 6:03 PM To:SaboJames Subject:One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr.Sebo, Yes all is difficult to please everyone but when zoning and rules are made they need to be respected and not changed for other developers. When I built my project on Vanderbilt beach some 24 years ago I had to respect all of the zoning and rules of witch I did . It would have been much more interesting and money making to build a 15 story beach and 10 story bay building . But yes I respected the 7 story beach and 6 story bay building. If you accept to amend or change the zoning and all the changes not allowed now then you create a precedent that I will be able to use in the future and others will to. If in the near future I may apply for another development permit on Vanderbilt Beach. I am waiting cause I have something very interesting in mind and will use all your changes in the Code that you will change. And it would be impossible for your group to refuse you will have then created the new zoning..... Richard Dubois Dear Mr. Sebo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. We know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. We have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! __________________________ ---------------------- 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Paul Pashibin <pash@mac.com> Sent:Sunday, August 2, 2020 10:50 AM To:SaboJames Subject:Please support the enforcement of Naples codes EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello James, I am a fairly new Naples resident. I hope to be here a long time. I came from Minneapolis, (the city of lakes) where our city planners supported a strong balance of commercial development, within codes and guidelines that protected the environment, and our residents. I expect growth in Naples, but I also expect MANAGED GROWTH, within current codes and guidelines. I expect our elected officials, city planners, commissioners and planning staff to support managed growth through the enforcement of the codes. Please use the power of your position, to support NOT ALLOWING Stock Development to move forward with One Naples, until such time when they can build to the current guidelines and codes. Paul & Molly Pashibin Naples, FL 612-803-9254 pash@mac.com 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:ljfproperties@rochester.rr.com Sent:Monday, August 3, 2020 2:39 PM To:SaboJames Subject:One Naples Development EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. My husband and I own a condo at Barefoot Pelican Condos, 271 Southbay Drive, Naples, Florida. We are opposed to the current plan of the One Naples Development. The towers are too high for the present code, and the proposed buildings and docks are too dense for this area. The additional traffic this development would generate for this area would complicate the already high traffic volume that we currently have now. We are not opposed to some development in this area, but the proposal by One Development will negatively change the area in which the current residents live. We will lose our beautiful view of the Gulf, as well as our view of the Bay. We hope the Collier County Planning Staff and Commissioners will carefully consider the concerns of the many residents that currently live in the area of the proposed development. Linda & Leonard Frederico 271 Southbay Drive Unit 258 Naples, Florida 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Marsha O <naplesmarsha9@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 4, 2020 4:04 PM To:SchmidtCorby; SaboJames Subject:One Naples Project Review---Growth Management Plan Ammendment EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear MrSchmidt and Mr Sabo, As the President of the Naples Park Area Association I have closely followed the process and documentation associated with this project with great interest and in great detail. I have been in direct conversation with Stock Development. This letter is written as a private citizen. I have learned much about the Growth Management process and I hope to have continued confidence in the Growth Management Department. Your reviews and requests have been clearly in earnest and with the intent of protecting Collier County development to be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Mr Schmidt I appreciate that you have requested from the developers a clear rationale explaining how the requested amendment to the Growth Management Plan is consistent with the plan's intent. You have not received this which you indicated against in your letter to the developer on June 19. I am GRAVELY concerned that the approval of the amendment now seems to be tied to whether or not the requested rezone (specifically the project proposal) is acceptable and if so that would justify approving the amendment. This is backwards. Please don't let that happen. I strongly request the Growth Management Department DEMAND a reason why the requested amendment is a good idea benefiting the community. Eliminating the possibility of anyone aside from the developer and his few customers to benefit from the project is inconsistent with the Growth Management Plan. You suggest the pools and piers are public areas. I don't think this is the intention of the developer. Yes the public can walk on sidewalks outside the facility and look at a fountain, but the pool and pier are meant to be private amenities for their residents. The ONLY civic/public area is the 10,000 square feet of commercial space, with some of this already allocated to a real estate office. Perhaps a small coffee shop will be available to the public. That's it. On ~5.4 acres of land, a real estate office and (maybe) a small coffee shop will be open to the public. Development of the property within the current zoning would enable countless people to benefit from that development---shop in stores, eat in restaurants, yes even attend movies in a movie theater consistent with the Growth Management plan. Limiting the benefits of use of the property to 172 owners of residences is NOT consistent with the Growth Management Plan. THIS is the reason the amendment must be denied. The developer continues to highlight how beautiful the project will be and that the current proposal is less offensive to the community than was the original plan and he has talked to many groups soliciting input. He has also indicated he will not further limit density, implicitly because he won't achieve his desired Return on Investment. He essentially threatens the potential of commercial development instead as the alternative, highlighting probably higher traffic density than his development would incur. 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 Mr Schmidt, the property is zoned C-3 so that it CAN have commercial development. I would welcome this so that the property can be enjoyed by many county residents and visitors to the county. Please do not recommend that the Growth Management Plan amendment be granted in absence of clarity of how the amendment will benefit the county residents and visitors vs only the developer. Thank you for considering my request. I am happy to discuss further with you -- Marsha Oenick 315-694-054 naplesmarsha9@gmail.com 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Dear Commissioners, I own two units in the Barefoot Pelican Condominiums on South Bay Drive. Because of it’s location, the Barefoot Pelican will be strongly impacted by the construction of the One Naples Development. That said, I can’t wait! The blight that has been allowed to exist on South Bay Drive is an embarrassment that has been ever present for at least the last decade. There is a silent majority of owners at the Barefoot Pelican whom are very excited about this project, welcome it and look forward to it bringing the neighborhood up to the standard of its neighbor, the Ritz Carlton Hotel. Unfortunately there is a small group of snow birds that control our Board of Directors and one resident in particular who has been obnoxiously vocal about their opposition to Stock’s plan. Please don’t let the voice of a few influence you when there are so many who “get it” and are welcoming to this investment which will not only improve the area dramatically, it will raise property values to all our benefit. I would also like to take a moment to compliment Brian Stock on his commitment to working with the neighborhood residents and sincerely caring about how we receive and feel about this investment into our community. There have been countless meetings and attempts to reach out and communicate with us all. The plan has been revised quite a few times as a result of concerns raised in these meetings. It is clear Stock intends on being a good neighbor and interested in proceeding with as little friction as possible. So it is in that spirit that I ask that you vote favorably and allow this much needed investment in our community to move forward and be constructed. If there are any further questions you have or insights I can offer, feel free to contact me. All My Best, Matthew Seely 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Brian P Delaney <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 11, 2020 3:01 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sebo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. We know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. We have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! Brian P Delaney_____________________ ---------------------- 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Carolyn jasiul ferrari <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Thursday, August 13, 2020 11:05 AM To:SaboJames Subject:One naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sebo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. We know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. We have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! __________________________ ---------------------- 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Kim jones <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Wednesday, August 12, 2020 8:22 AM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sebo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. We know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. We have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! __________________________ ---------------------- 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:John Brilbeck <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Thursday, August 13, 2020 7:34 AM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sebo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. We know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. We have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! __________________________ ---------------------- 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Eric Hansen <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Thursday, August 13, 2020 11:52 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sebo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. We know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. We have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! __________________________ ---------------------- 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Adalio T Sanchez <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Thursday, August 13, 2020 7:20 AM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sebo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. We know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. We have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! Adalio Sanchez 178 Conners Ave, Naples 34108 ---------------------- 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) August 26, 2020 To: Planning Commission Staff Planning Commission Members County Commissioners Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: The purpose of this communication is to reiterate my continued opposition to the proposed One Naples Development. Nearly 3,500 signatures have been obtained via on-line petitions opposing this project. Per the suggestion of Collier County staff, a thoughtful and responsible alternative has been developed and submitted on July 30 for consideration by each of your respective regulatory bodies. This alternative preserves the request by Stock for multi unit residential usage but does so with far less density, lower building heights, more open space, reasonable setbacks and eliminates the unfairly opaque request for phantom hotel usage. This alternative should be embraced by Stock, the regulators and the community. Moreover, Stock’s proposed development is likely unlawful, as it constitutes impermissible Spot Zoning. Stock seeks piecemeal rezoning of a small parcel of land to a far greater density, in disharmony with surrounding area, in disregard of the rights of the residents of the area, and with no meaningful benefit to the community. It is a naked effort to create an uncompensated wealth transfer from the thousands of residents who have long relied on the integrity of the current zoning rules to a single developer. Stock is effectively asking the Collier County Planning Staff, Planning Commission members and County Commissioners to break Florida law by allowing potential unlawful variances that would constitute impermissible Spot Zoning. Evidence and testimony will be offered during the upcoming public meetings supporting the position that spot zoning exists and is unlawful per Florida statues. Ken Melkus 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) RALF BROOKES ATTORNEY August 31, 2020 RE: One Naples Rezoning Application Dear Collier County Legal and Zoning Staff: Please find the following memorandum regarding legal and rezoning issues regarding the One Naples Rezoning Application. REZONINGS: THE LEGAL TEST. The Florida Supreme Court established a two-step standard for review of a rezoning application by local government board in Brevard County v. Snyder, 627 So.2d 469 (Fla. 1993): “we hold that: 1. a landowner seeking to rezone property has the burden of proving that the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan and complies with all procedural requirements of the zoning ordinance. 2. At this point, the burden shifts to the governmental board to demonstrate that maintaining the existing zoning classification with respect to the property accomplishes a legitimate public purpose.” Therefore, even if a rezoning application is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets procedural requirements, under the Florida Supreme Court’s standard for rezonings, a local government can still deny a rezoning request if there is any legitimate public purpose supporting the denial of the rezoning and keeping the existing zoning on the property. Under the first prong of the analysis Section 163.3194(3), Florida Statutes (1991), explains consistency as follows: “A development order or land development regulation shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan if the land uses, densities or intensities, and other aspects of development permitted by such order or regulation are compatible with and further the objectives, policies, land uses, and densities or intensities in the comprehensive plan and if it meets all other criteria enumerated by the local government.” But the Florida Supreme Court recognized and explained that a “comprehensive plan only establishes a long-range maximum limit on the possible intensity of land use; a plan does not simultaneously establish an immediate minimum limit on the possible intensity of land use. The present use of land may, by zoning ordinance, continue to be more limited than the future use contemplated by the comprehensive plan. Even where a denial of a zoning application would be inconsistent with the plan, the local government should have the discretion to decide that the maximum development density should not be allowed provided the governmental body approves some development that is consistent with the plan and the government's decision is supported by substantial, competent evidence.” This leads to the second prong of the analysis, and what is a legitimate public purpose? A “legitimate public purpose” can include general public health, safety and welfare issues such as traffic safety issues, neighborhood compatibility, burdens on infrastructure, impacts to the local environment, and impacts to the public health and welfare, but does not include a denial based on race, sex, religion or national origin of the applicant or any other distinction prohibited by the constitution. The Florida Supreme Court also explained that “the local government will have the burden of showing that the refusal to rezone the property is not arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable. If the board carries its burden, the application should be denied.” 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Spot Zoning. The application being made by Stock constitute prohibited “spot zoning.” The definition of spot zoning is well established in Florida law: Spot zoning is the name given to the piecemeal rezoning of small parcels of land to a greater density, leading to disharmony with the surrounding area. Spot zoning is usually thought of as giving preferential treatment to one parcel at the expense of the zoning scheme as a whole. “Southwest Ranches Homeowners Association v. Broward County,” 502 So.2d931, 935 (Fla 4th DCA 1987). To check zoning abuses, courts are authorized to perform a case-by-case evaluation of various relevant factors involving the size of the tract in question, whether the zoning was in conformity with a comprehensive use plan, whether the subject parcel is justifiably being treated differently from similarly surrounding land, and whether the zoning of the subject parcel confers a special benefit on the property owner to the detriment of the community as a whole. Mark S. Dennison, Determination Whether Zoning or Rezoning of Particular Parcel Constitutes Illegal Spot Zoning 73 ALR 5th 223 (1999). In this case, the proposed re-zoning of the subject parcel does confer a special benefit on the property owner to the detriment of the community as a whole. The request is for significantly greater density i.e., nearly double, and height than is allowed. The current zoning allows for 16 units per acre. One Naples is asking for a density of 31.73 units per acre. Further, the current zoning, and the intent of the Land Use Plan, was for a neighborhood of compatible uses, the proposed rezoning is detrimental to that community, does not comply with the current comprehensive use plan., and confers a special benefit on the property owner to the detriment of the community as a whole. /s/ Ralf Brookes Attorney Ralf Brookes Attorney 1217 E Cape Coral Parkway #107 Cape Coral, Fl 33904 Phone (239) 910-5464; fax (866) 341-6086 Ralf@RalfBrookesAttorney.com RalfBrookes@gmail.com 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Stephanie Karol <StephanieKarol@hmeng.com> Sent:Friday, July 24, 2020 4:20 PM To:SaboJames; SchmidtCorby Cc:Bob Mulhere; Daniel Denis Subject:RE: Collier County, FL: Bellmar Village Stewardship Receiving Area Project Neighborhood Information Meeting EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Topic: Bellmar Village SRA (PL-20190001837) Neighborhood Information Meeting Time: Aug 4, 2020 05:30 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada) Join Zoom Meeting https://hmeng.zoom.us/j/84506017024?pwd=dzRRUkJCOE9EY1ZMRUpBaW9LSXNjUT09 Meeting ID: 845 0601 7024 Passcode: 011637 Dial in by phone: 646 558 8656 Meeting ID: 845 0601 7024 Passcode: 011637 From: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 3:19 PM To: Bob Mulhere <BobMulhere@hmeng.com>; Stephanie Karol <StephanieKarol@hmeng.com> Cc: Daniel Denis <DanielDenis@hmeng.com> Subject: RE: Collier County, FL: Bellmar Village Stewardship Receiving Area Project Neighborhood Information Meeting Yes, please. Link to Zoom and live call-in numbers. Respectfully, C. James Sabo, AICP Principal Planner Zoning Division James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2708 “Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT.” 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Bob Mulhere <BobMulhere@hmeng.com> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 3:09 PM To: Stephanie Karol <StephanieKarol@hmeng.com>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Daniel Denis <DanielDenis@hmeng.com> Subject: RE: Collier County, FL: Bellmar Village Stewardship Receiving Area Project Neighborhood Information Meeting EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Do you need a link to the Zoom Meeting? Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP President 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Main Line: (239) 254-2000 Direct Line: (239) 254-2026 Cell Phone: (239) 825-9373 Facsimile: (239) 254-2099 From: Stephanie Karol <StephanieKarol@hmeng.com> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 2:24 PM To: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Bob Mulhere <BobMulhere@hmeng.com>; Daniel Denis <DanielDenis@hmeng.com> Subject: RE: Collier County, FL: Bellmar Village Stewardship Receiving Area Project Neighborhood Information Meeting What kind of information do you need and what is the County e-notifier? Stephanie Karol Permitting Coordinator HOLE MONTES, INC. Engineers · Planners · Surveyors 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Direct: (239) 254-2018 Main Line: (239) 254-2000 Facsimile: (239) 254-2099 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 3 From: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 2:14 PM To: Stephanie Karol <StephanieKarol@hmeng.com> Subject: FW: Collier County, FL: Bellmar Village Stewardship Receiving Area Project Neighborhood Information Meeting Hi Stephanie, I sent the forward to follow up regarding the County Manager requirement for remote access and virtual meetings. If you can let me know, that would be great. Connie Dean from Community Relations would like to update the County e- notifier. Respectfully, C. James Sabo, AICP Principal Planner Zoning Division James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2708 “Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT.” Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: DeaneConnie <Connie.Deane@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 11:42 AM To: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov>; BatesDanielle <Danielle.Bates@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Collier County, FL: Bellmar Village Stewardship Receiving Area Project Neighborhood Information Meeting James: The e-notifier below has been distributed. If/when you obtain info from the applicant in regard to remote access, please let Danielle Bates and me know so the web calendar info can be updated and another e-notifier may be distributed. Thanks, Connie Deane Community Liaison Community and Media Relations Section Collier County Growth Management Department 2885 S. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Connie.Deane@colliercountyfl.gov 239.252.8192 (main) 239.252.8365 (desk) 239.253.5616 (cell) 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4 From: webmaster@colliercountyfl.gov <webmaster@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 11:02 AM To: DeaneConnie <Connie.Deane@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Collier County, FL: Bellmar Village Stewardship Receiving Area Project Neighborhood Information Meeting EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Bellmar Village Stewardship Receiving Area Project Neighborhood Information Meeting Date: 08/04/2020 5:30 PM Location: New Hope Ministries, Lecture Hall (Room 211) 7675 Davis Boulevard Naples, Florida 34104 For more detailed information regarding this petition please select the link PL20190001837 For more information regarding this meeting, please contact Principal Planner C. James Sabo, AICP, at 239-252-2708 or via email at James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov Having trouble viewing this email? View on the website instead. Change your eNotification preference. Unsubscribe from all Collier County, FL eNotifications. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.2.p Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: August 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Jennifer Bayles <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 5:41 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Mike Brennan <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:02 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Pamala Cleaveland <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 2:40 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Anthony Crowe <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 2, 2020 2:47 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:JoAnn D'Agostino <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Thursday, September 3, 2020 8:49 AM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Ann Darwish <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 2, 2020 10:51 AM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood -One Naples Opposition EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 Ann Darwish Citizen in opposition to One Naples Project and increased density __________________________ ---------------------- 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Bruce Freedman <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 3:46 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Linda Frizzell <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:42 AM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Ellen GIlmore <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 5:29 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Barbara Gregg <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 2:46 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Jean Heidt <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Monday, September 7, 2020 11:32 AM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Carol Hulce <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 5:40 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Pelican Isle YC EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Lori & John Hyslip <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 2, 2020 4:56 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Jim Jacob <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 6:08 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Shelley Karrip <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 6:34 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Ellena Kiselev <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 3:08 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Patti Krug <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:26 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:John Kurtz and Cheryl Speers <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 8, 2020 2:19 AM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood and Naples One......pleaser read all EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, We are owners and live at 592 Beachwalk Circle N204 in Beachwalk Gardens. We are writing to you because we are concerned about the extreme congestion that already exists in the proposed Naples One area. Surely you are aware that such a monstrosity of a project will hopelessly snarl traffic and the beach in this already engorged area. Would you vote to have such project where you live?? Naples proper is already too congested and with water issues looming. We vote!!......and so do our many resident neighbors. Thanks for reading all of this. Most Sincerely, John Kurtz and Cheryl Speers ---------------------- 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Paul kusek <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 5:49 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:George Marks <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 2:20 PM To:SaboJames Subject:One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Jim, It is always a tough position as a planner to be caught between a developer, good planning and Politicians that may be not a responsive to the concerns of overdevelopment. Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Tom & Diane Meyer <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:13 PM To:SaboJames Subject:SAVE VANDERBILT BEACH PLEASE!!! EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Jane Mowat <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 3:20 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Cathy O'Brien <cathycobrien@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 8, 2020 1:21 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Stand Against One Naples As Proposed EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo: I am a resident of Regatta at Vanderbilt Beach and I support smart, managed growth and development in accordance with the stated objectives of the Land Development Code of Collier County. Stock’s current proposals blatantly conflict with the LDC and continue to present Pelican Bay as a neighborhood comparison. This, despite repeated requests to focus on the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. Any development of this site must be aligned with the LDC in a manner consistent with the character of the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. Stock’s website claims One Naples “will feel like it’s always been a part of the neighborhood.” Again, they sent a proposal which does NOT meet the LDC or neighborhood fit, due to: • Excessive density • Lack of adequate setbacks • Building height • Lack of open space • Hotel use not approved in existing C-3 zoning I respectfully request the Planning Commission vote to deny Stock approval to move forward with One Naples until they adequately address the above violations - without requesting code changes. In spite of Stock’s claims of total transparency, Stock has again neglected to provide the public with accurate, scaled plans that reasonably depict all aspects of the development. Based on what they have belatedly provided, this continues to be the wrong development for the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. After attending workshops, a NIM at which I was a speaker against the specifications of the development, and meetings with our Regatta condominium members, Stock continues to repeat the same messaging about transparency, yet remains tone- deaf with regard to real neighborhood look and feel issues. Despite concessions, the density STILL remains twice the current code. Setbacks are significantly inadequate, creating a cavernous, closed parcel similar to a New York City or Miami behemoth. One Naples claims that it “does not reinvent a neighborhood but “complements” its legacy.” In reality, Stock is doing the opposite. It is asking for changes in the LDC which will leave a cringe-worthy legacy for Vanderbilt Beach. The current proposal will not enhance Stock’s reputation. Thank you for considering my request. Please vote to deny Stock approval to move forward with One Naples until they adequately address the LDC violations above without requesting code changes. Sincerely, 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 Cathy O’Brien Regatta at Vanderbilt Beach 34108 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Diane Reed <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 2:27 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Schuman, William <wschuman@mwe.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 2, 2020 6:06 PM To:ClarkeThomas; AshtonHeidi; CasanovaAlexandra; FrantzJeremy; FrenchJames; GuitardDonna; JenkinsAnita; SaboJames; SawyerMichael; SchmidtCorby; ScottChris; ScottTrinity; ShawinskyPeter; bill@weo-pe.com; greg@stuarturbandesign.com; rpritt@ralaw.com; sspector@ralaw.com Subject:Opposition to One Naples Rezoning Application EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Legal and Zoning Staff: I write to amplify on the Spot Zoning issues addressed in Ralf Brookes’ letter to you of August 31, 2020 concerning the One Naples Rezoning application. As Mr. Brookes explains, the property owner seeking an amendment always has the initial burden of proving that the proposed zoning amendments are consistent with the comprehensive plan. However, as has been described in prior communications to you in opposition to Stock Development’s application, Spot Zoning is unlawful under Florida law. Where the proposed zoning amendment constitutes Spot Zoning, Florida law flat out prohibits the rezoning request, as it is unlawful. Spot zoning is the name given to the piecemeal rezoning of small parcels of land to a greater density, leading to disharmony with the surrounding area. Spot zoning gives preferential treatment to one parcel at the expense of the zoning scheme as a whole. See Southwest Ranches Homeowners Assoc. v. Broward County, 502 So.2d 931, 935 (Fla. 4 th DCA 1987). Unlawful Spot Zoning creates a small island of property with restrictions on its use different from that of surrounding properties, solely for the benefit of a particular property owner and to the detriment of the community or without a substantial public purpose. Allapattah Community Ass’n Inc. of Florida v. City of Miami, 379 So.2d 387 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); City Commissioner of the City of Miami v. Woodlawn Park Cemetery Co. 553 So.2d 1227, 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The determination of Spot Zoning involves an examination of (1) the size of the spot; (2) the compatibility with the surrounding area; (3) the benefit to the owner and (4) the detriment to the immediate neighborhood. Parking facilities, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 88 So.2d 141 (Fla. 1956); Dade County v. Inversiones Rafamar S.A., 360 So.2d 1130 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). As has been explained previously, Stock is impermissibly asking for (1) a density that is double that allowed by the current zoning law, (2) building heights that are more than double the permissible, existing building heights, (3) open space that is only half of that required by the current zoning law, and (4) setbacks that are only one-quarter of the setback currently required. Stock’s proposal is entirely incompatible and inconsistent with the comprehensive plan, the current zoning rules, and the surrounding neighborhoods. It seeks to create an impermissible “square peg” of land in an incompatible “round hole” community, to the great harm of, and with no benefit to, the entire community, and for the sole benefit of the developer. Stock’s proposal is, irrefutably, unlawful Spot Zoning. Stock is asking the Planning Staff, Planning Members, and the Commissioners to break the law. Under Florida law, Stock’s request must be rejected. I am available at any time to discuss these issues, if you would like to do so. Thanks much for your kind attention to, and consideration of, this matter. Respectfully, 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 William P. Schuman 8787 Bay Colony Drive Apt. 1804 Naples, Florida 34108 Cell: 847-951-2706 ******************************************************************************************************************* This message is a PRIVATE communication. This message and all attachments are a private communication sent by a law firm and may be confidential or protected by privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the information contained in or attached to this message is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Our Privacy Policy explains how we may use your personal information or data and any personal information or data provided or made available to us. Thank you. ******************************************************************************************************************* Please visit http://www.mwe.com/ for more information about our Firm. 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Michele Tamarkin <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 2, 2020 5:50 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:maureen trerice <emtrerice@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 2, 2020 1:50 PM To:SaboJames Cc:michael.sawyer@colliercounty.gov Subject:Re: I naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Have you seen these pictures of One Naples as it is currently designed? A towering local presence. Maureen Trerice > On Sep 2, 2020, at 9:03 AM, Maureen Trerice <emtrerice@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > <IMG_2214.JPG> > > > <IMG_2213.JPG> > > > <IMG_2212.JPG> > > Sent from my iPhone 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Virginia Ward <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 9, 2020 4:45 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 668 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 SaboJames From:Judith Wilson <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 6:53 PM To:SaboJames Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Sabo, Thank you so much for the work that you are doing to protect the interests of Collier County’s citizens as you work your way through Stock Development’s application for the rezone of the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. I know that it’s always a difficult task, but to do it without all the information you really require makes it doubly difficult. I have been following with keen interest Stock’s filings and your responses. Some of the things that are being asked for are simply unbelievable. A 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Lack of data is also an issue. How will a marina of up to 95 slips, for the use “primarily for residents and guests” impact traffic? How many guests? What of the charter boats that can operate out of three slips? How about the ship’s store? No data has been provided in the traffic studies provided. And here’s another one. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. How can that be acceptable? Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided you with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. As you know, these recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to consider the ideas presented therein, and to include them in your report to members of the Planning Commission. Please use your authority to recommend to the Planning Commission that they ask the County Commissioners to deny this project in its current format. Thank You! 9.A.2.q Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: September 2020 Opposed (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) April 26, 2020 Robert Pritt, Esq. Roetzel and Andress 850 Park Shore Drive Naples, FL 34103 Re: Opinion Letter _ The Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Small Scale Map Amendment (PL2019-0000696), The One Naples Planned Unit Development Zoning (PL20190000697) and the Petition for Gulf Shore Court Vacation (PL20200000368) Dear Robert: Pursuant to your request, I am taking this opportunity to present my professional land use planning opinion regarding the One Naples Small Scale Map Amendment and Mixed-use Planned Development Zoning (the One Naples project). The opinion focuses on: 1.Whether or not the map amendment is internally consistent with the Collier County Plan; 2.Whether the map amendment complies with Florida’s Community Planning Act 163.3177(6) planning analysis, 163.3177(2) internal inconsistencies and 163.3187(1)(a- b) small scale map amendment; and 3.Whether the companion rezoning is compatible and complimentary to surrounding Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive properties and neighborhoods and thus entitled for additional densities and reduced development standards. Property Location The 5.42 acre site is located at the northwest quadrant of the Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive intersection, Collier County. The subject project site has been assembled, with 48 separate folio numbered parcels. Gulf Shore and Vanderbilt Beach roads are classified two lane arterials. The site’s intersection location is highly prestigious and notable being uniquely sited in both the Gulf Shore Drive and the West Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhoods. The site is characterized as having ocean front and back-bay fronting views and access. The site is designated as a Future Urban Residential Subdistrict located within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). The subject property is currently zoned C-3 and developed with various commercial and residential uses. Page of 1 29 Stuart and Associates Planning & Design Services 239 - 677 - 6126 Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Drive Fort Myers, FL 33907 _ 97 Riverfront Drive Cashmere, WA 988915 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) The Small Scale Map Amendment and Planned Development Zoning Request The property owner, Vanderbilt Naples Holding, LLC (represented by Stock Development) requests the following Future Land Use Map and Element amendment: •A Small Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment, with a companion MPUD Rezone (PUDZ PL201900006967), to allow 172 total units, equal to 31.7 DUS/acre, 10,000 square feet of Retail, Restaurant, Personal Services and Professional Offices commercial uses, an undefined marina facility that is estimated at 55 to 99 slips with up to 4 slips leased to charter vessels, a 1,000 sf ships store and a fuel dock open to the public. The amendment request includes a 15% Open Space development standard which includes roof top open space and the ability to reduce required open space, by in-kind contributions acceptable to the Board of County Commissioners. The site’s Future Urban Residential Subdistrict designation may allow up to 16 DUS/ac., subject to plan and code previsions without a maximum building coverage. Based on RT zoning proximity, the property enjoys a 100-ft maximum height standard and a code standard 1/2 zoned building height setback requirement. The project requests different development standards for different development pods, buildings and water front areas. The One Naples Mixed Use Planned Development rezoning standards are identified on the following page. The development standard table includes current C-3 zoning district standards, along with a percentage standard request change. The One Naples Development Standards and Master Concept Plan The project’s requested Master Concept Plan, its Vanderbilt Beach Road Landscape Plan Exhibit G and its requested development standards compared to existing C-3 zoning are identified on pages 3 and 4. The request’s development standards and MCP are as of 03/27/20. Page of 2 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page of 3 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Introduction To The One Naples Project From a review of the 03/27/20 One Naples project’s Mixed Use Development Performance Standards and Master Concept Plan (see pg. 3 table), project development standards and general observations are as follows: 1.A 198% property density increase, from 87 to 172 total units; 2.A 182% zoning building height increase, from 100-ft to 182-ft.; 3.A 60% + front and side setback reduction, from 1/2 building height to 10 to 25-ft.; 4.From 30% to 15% project open space standard (includes roof top open space); Page of 4 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 5.From min. 25-ft waterfront setback to a zero-ft waterfront setback; 6.The application’s Master Concept Plan and analysis does not include waterfront marina design information and plans for the requested 55 to 99 boat slip private/public marina; the MCP and Application does not take into account any associated marina to project and neighbors uses and user impacts; 7.The application’s MCP and development standards does not include adequate Vanderbilt Beach Rd and Gulf Shore Dr streetscape design standards and marina standards, including pedestrian, service, parking and circulation, landscaping, lighting, signage and other design standards. 8.The application does not provide any Gulf Shore Dr and Vanderbilt Beach Rd pedestrian and streetscape analysis and design standards to ameliorate potential 40-ft tall garage with 15-ft setback impacts. The application does not include any measurable architectural designs for the March 2020 site plan and its four requested buildings; the 525-ft long +/- 87-ft tall waterfront building presents height, mass, bulk and setback issues; 9.The application fails to provide architectural elevations and streetscape cross section plan graphics for the LDC 5.05.08.D.3.c.i. deviation, to not require a “Transitional Massing Element” for the 40-ft tall parking garage podium structure along Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive. The application requests that development standards should be relaxed for the purpose of obtaining flexibility in site redevelopment. The application asks that the project’s development standards should be treated similar in manner to a community redevelopment project (see “all costs are borne by the developer, without the incentives and relaxations typically afforded a CRA” Application Justification pdf pg. 4.) Collier Co. Policy 4.8 delegates all redevelopment plans solely to the County Commission. The BOCC has never designated the site for redevelopment. So this line of argument is specious. The application puts forward its case justification by arguing that the mixed-use planned development and marina will lead to better neighborhood conditions and impacts when compared to existing C-3 zoning. Greg Stuart, MUP_ Opinion Letter Review and Approach Greg Stuart has been qualified as an expert in land use planning, land development and urban design in Collier, Lee and other Florida local governments and circuit court, along with various Washington State local governments, circuit and federal court. A resume is on file with the Collier County Hearing Examiners Office. The following analytical review process underpins this opinion letter: •Site Visit and Neighborhood/Community Windshield Survey; Page of 5 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) •One Naples FLUM Amendment October 2019, January 2020 and March 2020 File Review and Application, including the January 8, 2020 FLUM Language Amendment, the various March 27, 2020 Application Files and revised MCP’s and standards, the Applications Justification Statement and Developer Commitments, Supplemental Design Information, Traffic Impact Statement (01/20 and 03/20); other Application Maps and Graphics, Deviation Justification, and Zoning Application Evaluation Criteria; •The January 20, 2020 HMA Response Letter to Collier Staff , the November 20, 2019 and February 26, 2020 Staff Request For Information, March and POI Zoning Application; •One Naples Adjacent Property Information Ex. C; •County Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Element, Other Elements and Maps; and •Collier County Land Development Code, Marina Codes and Manatee Protection Plan. Florida law requires that comprehensive plan map amendments be “fairly debatable”, in part given the legislative nature of the decision making process. For the purpose of this opinion letter, the fairly debatable determination is predicted on: 1.Whether the map amendment and companion re-zoning can logically be considered complimentary and compatible to the Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road properties and neighborhoods given project densities and building height doubled while reducing development setback and open space standards. 2.Whether the map amendment and mixed-use PD zoning predictably reflects an accurate analysis and understanding of neighborhood context; whether the application provides factual evidence that proves the project is compatible and complimentary to the surrounding neighborhoods. 3.Whether the One Naples Map Amendment will be fair; i.e, will the map amendment grant a unique and special privilege to the applicant that other Gulf Shore Drive owners may or may not enjoy, or that can be used for future Gulf Shore Drive density increase requests? The quasi-judicial zoning process is based on the weighing and acceptance of factual evidence. As evidence this report relies on mapping and analysis with foundational planning practices and principles at the core. This will include an assessment of the application’s Justification Ex. V.D.1 Justification and Supplemental Information page 4 paragraph 4, which is: 1.High quality mixed use development that is complimentary to and compatible with the surrounding development. 2.Creates a desirable mixed use development by bringing related activities closer together. 3.Promotes pedestrian, bicycle and transit utilization. Page of 6 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) The One Naples Planning Study Area Collier County requires adjacent property mapping information for compatibility analysis and findings determination. The Application’s Adjoining Property Information Exhibit C provides a limited surrounding property compatibility analysis. The Application’s limited planning study area leads to skewed neighborhood building heights findings and flawed compatibility findings. Applicant Exhibit C relies on 2 West Vanderbilt Beach Road north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd and 1 oceanfront condominium along the west side of South Gulf Shore Dr. The applicant’s primary planning study area consists of the Pelican Bay’s ocean front high-rise properties south of Vanderbilt Beach. The Application’s positive compatibility findings are reliant on eight Pelican Landing 20 story + high rises, and the north Vanderbilt Beach Road’s the Regatta and the Beachmoor properties. The Application’s Exhibit C compatibility building height information ignores almost completely all Gulf Shore Drive’s ocean front and back-bay fronting properties, along with all of Vanderbilt Beach Road’s predominant 1 and 2 story single-family and low-rise multi- family neighborhood properties. The application’s Exhibit C lacks logical boundaries; it ignores Vanderbilt Beach Road’s functional neighborhood boundary between Pelican Bay/ Bay Colony PUD from conventionally zoned C-3, RT and RMF 16 Gulf Shore and Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhoods. An accurate adjoining property planning study area must include Gulf Shore Drive, both the north and south sides of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Naples Park back bay neighborhoods (see the following page Planning Study Area map Exhibit 1). An accurate analysis will lead to more accurate compatibility findings; i.e. matching building heights, setbacks and densities. The Application’s positive compatibility findings do not rely on an accurate planning study. Page of 7 29 One Naples Adjacent Property Information Exhibit C One Naples Applicant Compatibility Planning Area 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page of 8 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Neighborhood Compatibility Analysis _ Zoning Properties located on the south side of Vanderbilt Beach Road are zoned PUD as part of the Pelican Bay project and Bay Colony neighborhoods. The PUD includes high density ocean front and non-ocean front high-rises, MF medium-low density 2 to 3 story flats and 1 to 2 story single-family homes (small lot, zero lot and attached). Properties located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road and along Gulf Shore Drive have conventional C-3, RT and RMF 16 zoning, with the RSF 3 Seabreeze/Channel/Bayview Ave zoned single-family neighborhood bisecting Gulf Shore Drives ocean front and back bay MF uses. As such, properties and neighborhoods along the north Vanderbilt Beach Road right-of-way are distinct and separate from Pelican Bay. Two planned developments are located adjacent to the One Naples site. They are the 12 story Regatta and Beachmoor condominiums. Low story low density RMF 6 neighborhoods are located east of the site and along Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Based on the conventional zoning districts, properties north of Vanderbilt Beach Road and along Gulf Shore Drive have densities and associated building heights lower than what is found within the Pelican Bay PUD. Hence, the Vanderbilt Beach Road serves as distinct neighborhood density edge. Page of 9 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Neighborhood Compatibility Analysis _ Building Height Within the Pelican Bay PUD there are 6 ocean front properties having 20 to 22 stories (please refer to the following page, Neighborhood Building Height Ex 3). The PUD includes 3 tall, high density non-ocean front high-rises. The application primarily relies on these 9 high-rises for it’s project compatibly findings. It is noted that these examples of application desired building height are not located in the Gulf Shore Drive and West Vanderbilt Road neighborhoods. It is further noted that the application ignores all Pelican Bay SF and MF 1 to 3 story housing neighborhoods for their mapping analysis. The application relies on the 12 story Regatta and Beachmoor projects to support a finding of One Naples height compatibility. The application ignores the fact that properties located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road and along Gulf Shore Drive have a wide variety of building heights, ranging from 1 story to 14 stories, such as the adjoining 5 story Barefoot Pelican Condo and the east located 1 and 2 story Beachwalk neighborhood. Identified on the Building Height Pattern Analysis Exhibit 4, based on a building height sample of 24 properties the South Gulf Shore Drive exhibits an average building height of 6.9 stories. Based on a building height sample of 3 properties the West Vanderbilt Beach Road exhibits an average building height of 10.25 stories. Utilizing a building height sample of 9 properties, the East Vanderbilt Beach Road and Bay Colony neighborhoods exhibit a 1 to 2 story building height average. Relying on a building height sample of 8 properties the Bay Colony Drive ocean front projects neighborhoods exhibit an average 20.8 story building height. The Exhibit 4’s key finding is that the One Naples 208-ft building height is significantly higher than any contextually relevant Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road property. Furthermore, the 208-ft building height is much higher than the three adjacent properties potentially most affected by the One Naples MU-1 building height, including the Regatta, Barefoot Pelican and the Beachmoor. Page of 10 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page of 11 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Building Height Neighborhood Compatibility Findings The One Naples site lies within both the South Gulf Shore Drive and West Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhoods. It’s 2-lane coastal arterial road intersection site grants the project a prestigious location, central to community prominence and importance, with beach oriented streetscapes and back-bay boat access. Vanderbilt Beach Road is the logical and definitive neighborhood boundary, distinguishing Pelican Bay’s PUD higher density/higher building height coastal development, to Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Page of 12 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Shore Drive's conventional RSF 3, RMF-6, RMF-16, RT and C-3 zoned properties with associated lower density and building height (16 units an acre for RMF 16, RT and C-3, other lower densities as specified). These areas are located north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd and have an average property height of 7 stories. Since they are not actually located within the Gulf Shore Drive and West Vanderbilt Road neighborhoods, the use of Pelican Bay building heights as a measure of compatibility should be discounted accordingly. By ignoring almost all of the Gulf Shore Drive ocean front and back-bay fronting properties the application has not adhered to professionally accepted and geographically sound mapping and planning compatibility analysis practices. The application does not distinguish neighborhoods by zoning districts, housing characteristics, street location and density/building heights. The application’s Adjacent Properties Information Map Ex. C is deficient and derived application findings in error. As of March 27, 2020 the map amendment request has not performed the requisite analyses as per 163.3177(6). The One Naples request is for 182-ft zoned height and 208-ft actual height for the MU-1 high-rise pod. For the other two buildings, the project requests 55-ft zoned and 87-ft actual height. The MU-1 height request is 230% + greater than the neighborhood 7 story average building height. The request is a 208% increase over the C-3 zoning100-ft. height standard. The existing C-3 100-ft height and 16 DUS/acre development standard is complimentary with and compatible to the neighborhood’s 7 story height average. The C-3 standards more or less support to-scale development form with the adjacent Regatta. Consistent with the Stuart exhibits 2 through 5, anything over current C-3 standards will lead to a lessening of complimentary and compatible neighborhood character due to inappropriate development standards. The greater the degree of divergent C-3 to One Naples development standards, the greater the probable impacts. It is logical that, since the One Naples project is proposing standards far removed from anything closely resembling C-3, then the project as currently proposed will be equally far removed from being complimentary and compatible to the surrounding neighborhoods. The application has not provided any evidence that the increased building height supports community character compatibility objectives. There is no evidence presented that two 208-ft high rise buildings will create a desirable mixed-use development by bringing related activities closer together. In fact, a strong case can be made that high-rise buildings serve to separate and isolate activities. Finally, no evidence has been presented that tall high-rise buildings at the subject location will promote pedestrian, bicycle and transit utilization. The One Naples map amendment and companion PD zoning requested building height does not meet the standard established in Policy 5.6: •POLICY 5.6 New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. Page of 13 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Community Character Analysis _ The Gulf Shore Dr. & Vanderbilt Bch. Rd. Setbacks and Building Form Referring to the Stuart Setback Exhibit 6, surrounding property setbacks are noted in white font, with the One Naples setbacks identified in yellow font. The setbacks were determined by use of the Collier Co. Property Appraiser GIS program. Not knowing ROW location, the setbacks are measured to public road paved section. Though more accurate source information is needed to secure final measurements, the use of GIS does provide for general description and meaningful, preliminary analysis. Two adjacent Planned Page of 14 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Developments, Beachmoor and Regatta, have front setbacks in line with county code requirements, (1/2 ft for every foot increase over the base height with min. 25-ft front setback). The main Regatta Condominium building is setback from Vanderbilt Beach Rd approximately 180-ft.; the Beachmoor is setback from Gulf Shore Dr by 85-ft. Other Gulf Shore Dr setbacks range from 52-ft to 108-ft. The parking garage opposite the One Naples site is setback approximately 75-ft from Vanderbilt Beach Rd. The Barefoot Pelican condominium has a 40-ft side yard setback to Vanderbilt Beach Rd. The project requests a Vanderbilt Beach Rd and Gulf Shore Dr 15-ft setback for the 40-ft tall parking garage and podium. The project requests a Vanderbilt Beach Rd and Gulf Shore Dr 25-ft setback for the primary 208-ft tall high rise buildings. The project requests a Southbay Drive 10-ft side yard setback for the MU-2 building. The One Naples project requests a zero foot waterfront setback for the MU-3/MU-4 building. These requested setbacks are much less than existing zoning code standards, which are a 1/2 -ft increase for every foot height increase. For the project’s 182-ft high-rises, the front setback should be 91-ft, which is substantially deeper than the proposed 15-ft to 25-ft setbacks. C-3 zoning requires a minimum 25-ft waterfront setback, which is substantially deeper than the requested zero foot building setback. Page of 15 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Community Character Analysis _ One Naples Height, Mass & Bulk Streetscape Impacts Referring to the Stuart Height, Mass and Bulk Community Character Exhibit 7, the two 208- ft MU-1 high-rise buildings setback by 25-ft, combined with a 40-ft tall 15-ft setback accessory residential parking garage/podium setback from Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive, present significant development height and bulk streetscape impacts. It is noted that more accurate site and architectural plan information, including CAD files, are needed in order provide for a more accurate and detailed height, bulk and mass community character impact analysis. However, by interpreting building height and mass by adjoining property scale with information provided by Collier County Property Appraiser, Google Earth and application submittal information, a generally correct building height, bulk and mass community character assessment is obtained and provides for both general description and meaningful preliminary analysis. The applicant’s choice of going forward with a hard-edge coastal resort urban form impacts the community far greater than a more compatible soft-edge coastal resort suburban form. The application’s development standards and density follow a Collins Ave. Miami Beach model. A Collins Ave. model for the subject location is not compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses (see Urban Form examples below). Referring to Stuart Exhibit 8, the One Naples site is located within a suburban coastal area context defined by code-specified setbacks and open spaces. The One Naples application does not acknowledge this fact. Therefore it fails to put forward a compatible and complimentary project that is based on a “soft” edge suburban form. The One Naples design’s development standard underpin too massive, too tall and too bulky MU-1 and MU-3/4 building form. The MU-1 building form does not incorporate ground level pedestrian stores, shops and activities along Gulf Shore and Vanderbilt Beach Road. This fact impacts community character by creating approximately 700 linear feet of a “dead zone”street dominated by a 40-ft tall parking garage/podium structure setback 15-ft. It is more than reasonable to expect negative community character impacts from this 15-ft to 25-ft setback from Gulf Shore and Vanderbilt Beach Road design approach. Page of 16 29 Proposed One Naples Vanberbilt Beach Road Streetscape Plan _ 15-ft. 40-ft. Tall Parking Garage Setback w./No Pedestrian Level Stores/Shops/Activities; Includes An 8-ft. Mulitpath & 7-ft. Wide Landscape Strip @ 4.5 Trees Per 100-LF (19 Palms & 17 Medium Trees) Existing Pedestrian Level Mixed Uses @ 9002 Gulf Shore Drive Generalized Location Of 15-ft. Parking Garage Setback 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Page of 17 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) It is more than reasonable to expect that the One Naples high-rise buildings and the 525-ft long MU_3/4 waterfront building with zero setback, will directly and negatively impact neighboring properties, including Barefoot Pelican and Regatta condominiums due to out-of context neighborhood height, bulk and mass impacts. Direct adjoining and adjacent property impacts that can be expected from One Naples will include light and shading, views and vistas, noise and other impacts. Community Character Analysis _ Waterfront Design Impacts Analysis Referring to the Community Character Waterfront Design Impacts Analysis Exhibit 9 the application requests a zero foot back-bay waterfront setback for an 87-ft tall 525-ft long +/- building. A zero foot setback for a tall, monolithic building impacts the visual qualities and community character of the back-bay area. It is noted that most back-bay properties incorporate the minimum 25-ft rear waterbody setback and are not as long and bulky as what is requested. For example, Barefoot Pelican’s longest building is. approximately 260- ft in length. The MU-3/4 building is completely out of context with the surrounding neighborhood; the One Naples MCP and development standards are not compatible with the neighboring residences. It is noted that the tallest back-bay waterfront building for the subject area is the Regatta. Yet, by incorporating a 68-ft to 208-ft setback the Regatta is compatible with the neighborhood. This contrasts to the One Naple’s design approach that does not incorporate meaningful building setbacks. The One Naples water front building (MU-3 & 4) with it’s zero-foot setback, will directly impact Barefoot Pelican Condominium’s and a significant portion of the Regatta’s views and vistas. One Naples will create shadow impacts and other nuisance related impacts due to proximity. The applications two high-rise buildings will create views and vista impacts to the Regatta and to low rise MF and single-family homes along Vanderbilt Drive. Page of 18 29 Barefoot Pelican Min. 25-ft. Waterfront Setback The Regatta Varied Waterfront Setbacks From 68-ft. to 220-ft. +/- Proposed Zero Ft. Waterfront Setback 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Community Compatibility Findings The application has failed to demonstrate how the map amendment and zoning will create a “high quality mixed use development that is complimentary to and compatible with the surrounding development”. Referring to Stuart Exhibits 6, 7, 8 and 9, the One Naples Master Concept Plan and development standards present a “hard-edge” coastal urban resort form, characterized by tall building heights and narrow setbacks on narrow streets. The request is in contrast to the Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhood suburban context, characterized as having a “soft-edge” suburban form with more moderate building heights, and code-compliant setbacks, open spaces and density. The application’s objective to “creates a desirable mixed use development by bringing related activities closer together”, is not supported by the too-narrow setbacks, too-tall buildings, and closed/private resort orientation with no active streetscape/ground level stores, shops and activities. The use of large monolithic structures is contrary to good community character development design. Both the dual street fronting 40-ft tall parking garage and the 525-ft long 87-ft tall waterfront building present negative height, mass and bulk neighborhood compatibility impacts. The project is not compatible and complimentary to its surrounding neighborhoods. When evaluating the map amendment Page of 19 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) and companion planned development zoning request, a professionally accepted approach requires the review to examine the combined influence of doubling allowable densities within a Miami-like coastal resort urban form. It is the interrelationship of increased density with increased building heights, reduced setback standards and reduced open space that create community character and compatibility inconsistency issues. Deviations Findings The application’s deviation request to LDC 5.05.08.D.3.c.i_ •LDC 5.05.08.D.3.c.i., which requires that “Transitional massing elements be no more than 100 percent taller than the average height of adjacent buildings [within 150 feet”, but no more than 30 feet, and no less than ten feet above the existing grade” to instead allow for the parking podium, on MU Tract 1, which functions as a transitional massing element, to be a maximum of 35 feet in height. The application does not provide to-scale building elevations and Gulf Shore/Vanderbilt street cross sections to support professional planning analysis. Therefore the application is deficient in regard to providing proper data and analysis (163.3177(6)). The deviation justification is that the 40-ft parking garage/podium serves as the transitioning device to the 208-ft high rises. Therefore nothing more is needed. The justification ignores important street level views, vistas and perceptions; the deviation disregards the importance of advancing pedestrian streetscape (see C-3 Mixed Use Design Standard 4.02.38). The deviation serves to further turn the project’s back on neighborhood and community character and livability considerations. If approved the deviation will serve to deaden the adjoining streetscapes by creating a monolithic and massive structure with an unwelcoming pedestrian interface devoid of ground level pedestrian activities. The deviation is not consistent with Policy 5.6 ("New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code”) directly because of a lack of neighborhood contextual design and contextually correct development standards. The map amendment and companion rezoning is internally inconsistent with the Collier Plan in violation of 163.3177(2). The C-3 Is Worse Than PD Argument The applicant puts forward a justification that resulting development form and intensity under the existing C-3 will be worse for the neighborhood than what the planned development is proposing. A closer examination of the proposition proves that the assertion is false and without logic. The PD puts forward an essentially private resort with undefined and unidentified mixed uses. C-3 zoning allows business, professional and personal services to the pubic, along with residential as per 4.02.38 Conditional Mixed-Use. Hotels are not permitted and Page of 20 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) restaurants have to be within the principal structure. C-3 offers more public activity and uses benefits. A comparison of C-3 to One Naples development standards demonstrates that it is logically impossible for the project to claim comparable and compatible new development with low impacts equal to, if not better, than the baseline C-3 zoning. One Naples adds 1252 new net average daily vehicle trips, doubles building height and density, reduces and/or eliminates setbacks and does not require 4.02.38 type compliant mixed use urban design standards. C-3 standards are similar to adjacent PD standards and thus are compatible. Existing C-3 zoning standards advance compatibility. The diminishment of C-3 standards will lead to compatibility diminishment. THE C-3 EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMPARED TO ONE NAPLES COMPARISON TABLE Page of 21 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Application Submittals, Sufficiency and Marina Evaluation The project has not fully complied with Application for Public Hearing 10.03.06 B: 15. General location map drawn to scale, illustrating north point and relationship of the site to external facilities such as highways, shopping areas, cultural complexes and the like. •Comment _ no mapping of parking lots and garages, Naples Park, Beachwalk, Gulfshore Drive and other residential neighborhoods; no mapping of public beach access and existing pedestrian ways. 17. Description or narrative of project development, including a description of the relationship of the proposed land uses to each other within the PUD and to land uses abutting/surrounding the project. •Comment _ no public and private interface, uses, users and activities content. 21. The proposed timing for location of, and sequence of phasing, or incremental development within the PUD. •Comment _ Marina and building phasing plan (all in one phase?) 22. The proposed location of all roads and pedestrian systems, with typical cross sections, which will be constructed to serve the PUD and shall be attached as exhibits to the ordinance of adoption. •Comment _No cross sections, no elevations, no marina to public interface plans, no details; the MCP does not identify the location of non-residential 10,000 sf uses. 35. When determined necessary to adequately assess the compatibility of proposed uses to existing or other proposed uses, relationship to open space, recreation facilities, or traffic impacts, or to assess requests for reductions in dimensional standards, the Planning & Zoning Division Director may request schematic architectural drawings (floor plans, elevations). •Comment _ The project is located at the prestigious and unique Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road intersection; with 700 +/- street frontage the application requires cross sections, architectural drawings, etc. The project has not fully complied with PUD Master Plan 10.02.13 A: 5. Identify all proposed and permitted land uses, pursuant to LDC section 2.03.06, within each tract or increment describing: •Percentage of total development represented by each type of use. •Outline of the proposed building footprint (each tract or increment); •Comment _ not adequately provided on MCP Page of 22 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9. Typical cross sections of all major, collector, and local streets, public or private, within the proposed development. •Comment _ Not adequately provided On MCP 10. The location of proposed and existing roads, rights-of-way, and pedestrian systems within 1,500 feet of the proposed development. •Comment _ Detailed Gulf Shore Drive and other pedestrian systems, and marina interface pedestrian systems not adequately provided on MCP The project has not undertaken a 5.05.02 Marina review for an up to 99 slip marina with ships store and fuel docks. The applicant has not provided any marina user, activity and impact information for the requested 55 to 99 wet slip marina facility with fuels pumps and ships store. A 99 slip facility is a large marina; Naples City Docks has 84 slips and Docks On Fifth has 60 slips. Marina accessory use service and user traffic, access and circulation, nuisance related impacts and the like are not identified and assessed. Development design to marina interface site planning considerations and HOA residents users and guests definition issues remain to be assessed. The degree, if any, of non-residential condominium owners renting or owning boat slips may generate external traffic impacts that need to be examined. The applicant has not performed the requisite analyses as per 163.3177(6); Collier County should find the application insufficient. One Naples Collier County Comprehensive Plan Consistency Analysis The map amendment and zoning application is not consistent with various objectives and policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. These internal inconsistencies are prohibited by 163.3177(2). Please see the following One Naples comprehensive plan consistency analysis. OBJECTIVE 3: Ensure protection of natural and historic resources, ensure the availability of land for utility facilities, promote compatible land uses within the airport noise zone, and to provide for management of growth in an efficient and effective manner through Land Development Regulations adopted to implement this Growth Management Plan. •RESPONSE _The PD development standards weaken existing C-3 rules and reduces LDC efficiency and effectiveness. The application Exhibit G Streetscape Landscaping illustrates the applications lack of consistency with Objective 3 in so far as site planning, streetscape design, urban design and buffering. At 792.8-ft and with 36 total Vanderbilt Beach Road trees (19 Palm and 17 Medium Trees) the planting scheme is 4.5 trees per 100 LF. At 274.8-ft and with 12 total Gulf Shore Drive trees (6 Palm and 6 Medium Trees) the planting scheme is 4.5 trees per 100 LF. The 4.5 trees per 100 LF is a minimal standard, and not sufficient to address 208-ft tall high-rises and associated streetscape/pedestrian impacts. The project fails to meet adjoining property and neighborhood compatibility standards. The project fails to meet it’s Page of 23 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) entitlement request criteria under LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5. The project is not consistent with Objective 3 and 3F. F The safe and convenient flow of on-site traffic, as well as the design of vehicle parking areas, are addressed through the site design standards and site development plan requirements of the LDC, which include: access requirements from roadways, parking lot design and orientation, lighting, building design and materials, and landscaping and buffering criteria. •RESPONSE_The MCP design does not provide for safe and convenient on-site traffic as to deficiencies in parking lot design, parking lot orientation, building design and landscaping and buffering (see Stuart Exhibits 7 through 9). OBJECTIVE 5: Implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element. •RESPONSE_The map amendment language and the planned development standards do not ensure compatibility of land uses; the request weakens existing C-3 zoning standards. The project is not consistent with Objective 5 and Policies 5.3 and 5.6. Policy 5.3: All rezonings must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan. For properties that are zoned inconsistent with the Future Land Use Designation Description Section but have nonetheless been determined to be consistent with the Future Land Use Element, as provided for in Policies 5.9 through 5.13, the following provisions apply: •RESPONSE_ The One Naples mixed use marina planned development is not internally consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. •RESPONSE_The One Naples mixed use marina planned development is not compatible with and complementary to the Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhoods (see Stuart Exhibits 2 through 9). The project fails to meet it’s entitlement request criteria under LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5. OBJECTIVE 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: •RESPONSE_The One Naples project’s development character is not compatible and complimentary to existing development character (see Stuart Exhibits 2 through 9). The project is not consistent with Objective 7 and Policies 7.3 and 7.4. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/ or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. •RESPONSE_ The applicant is applying for a plat vacation for Gulf Shore Court and the western portion of Center Street (PL20200000368 is a Petition for Vacation). By Page of 24 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) definition and logic, the plat vacation demonstrates comprehensive plan Policy 7.3 inconsistency. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. •RESPONSE_ The One Naples project’s development height, bulk and building form is not compatible and complimentary to the Gulf Shore and Vanderbilt Beach road streetscape (see Stuart Exhibits 3 through 9). Final Opinion _ Logic and Basis It is not fairly debatable that the map amendment logically fits into, is complimentary and compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods. The amendment and companion re- zoning doubles density and building height, significantly reduces and/or eliminates development setback standards, and reduces required minimum open space by 50%. The project puts forth a design that does not address the relationship of it’s 40-ft tall parking garage and 208-ft tall high-rise buildings to streetscape pedestrian experience. The application lacks sufficient information regarding non-residential use location, architecture elevations, landscaping, lighting and signage cross sections. The surrounding neighborhood’s 7 story average height, and 2, 5 and 12 story buildings with code compliant setbacks is the neighborhood form and context. The One Naples project development standards are completely opposite of the surrounding neighborhoods. Thus it is not logical to deem the project “compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses” . The application does not address waterfront compatibility concerns and marina impacts. As of March 27, 2020, there is no marina related and upland to marina design integration and impact information in the map amendment and zoning files. Therefore it is not logical to deem the marina compatible and complementary with the neighborhood since there is no information. •COMMENT _ The small map amendment presents little, if any, justification and meaningful public benefits for site intensification. The subject Gulf Shore Drive/ Vanderbilt Beach Road property is unique and valuable. The existing C-3 zoning grants private land use benefit while allowing for public use and activities. The requested PUDZ offers benefits primarily to the residents of the project while offering relatively “thin” public commitments when examined to the value that the public sector is being asked to transfer by the amendment and rezoning: •Site access improvements, technology enhancements and infrastructure improvements •Pedestrian Improvements - undefined sidewalk along Gulf Shore Dr., 8-ft. Multi-path along the north side of Vanderbilt and enhanced landscaping (Ex. G) •Emergency Management - 150 cots to Collier Co Emergency Management and a 16-ft. Enclosed Utility Trailer Page of 25 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Final Opinion _ Factual Evidence The Applicant has not submitted for review accurate neighborhood development character analysis and marina impact analysis analyses as required by F.S. § 163.3202 and 163.3177(6), and Collier Co. 10.02.13 a – f PUD Master Plan, 10.03.06 b Compatibility Application information, 4.07.04 Mixed-use PD hour of operations, and 5.05.02 marina review. As of March 27, 2020 the application is not sufficient and lacks adequate factual information. The requested One Naples Mixed Use lacks factual neighborhood compatibility and impact evidence in making the case that it complies with Policy 5.6 and that the projects fits with the surrounding neighborhood character. The land use amendment and zoning lack predictable eveidence; they do not rely on accepted Vanderbilt Beach Rd and Gulf Shore Drive development context. Factual analysis would show that the surrounding relevant neighborhoods for compatibility assessment are north of Vanderbilt Beach Road, not south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd. These neighborhoods have a Coastal Suburban development form and pattern, characterized as having a range of low to mid-rise building height (5 to 12 stories), code compliant roadway setbacks, minimum 25-ft waterfront setbacks and minimum 30% open space. The map amendment and companion zoning requests a development design based on a Coastal Urban Resort building form. This urban form is characterized by narrow road setbacks, high-rise tall buildings and little open space. The project’s Coastal Urban Resort building form is inherently distinct and separate from the neighborhood’s suburban form and context. The applicant has not provided any evidence to justify an urban coastal building form to a suburban coastal building form. Finally, it is impossible for the project to meet neighborhood compatibility provisions because of this design model choice. •COMMENT _ To ensure community character and compatibility, accepted planning practices may include using following techniques: •An incremental density and building height design standard changes; •Match and use existing setback dimensions; and •Design for pedestrian scale at the streetscape and waterfront. These three planning practices are not utilized by the applicant. Therefore the application’s Master Concept Plan and Development Standards are not logically based on professional planning principles and practices. •COMMENT _ The application does not comply with 163.3177(6) in that compatibility assessment was based on a limited adjoining property mapping analysis (see Applicant Map C). As such the project’s land use planning analysis is flawed. The application has not provided meaningful justification for the request for increased intensity, increased building height and significantly reduced setbacks. The application is internally inconsistent with 8 Collier growth management plan objectives and policies, including the “compatibility” Policy 5.6. The application is not based on factual evidence and does not comply with 163.3177(2). Page of 26 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Final Opinion _ Unique Privileges and Future Interests The map amendment will grant a unique and special privilege to the applicant that other Gulf Shore Drive property owners may or may not enjoy, or that can be used for future Gulf Shore Drive density increase requests. The approval of the map amendment and companion rezoning will grant the applicant a unique and special privilege by doubling density from 16 to 31 units per acre, increasing building height by 208%, and reducing setbacks by 60% , in return for limited public benefit commitments. The map amendment is not necessary and fails to demonstrate any type of land use planning deficiency which it is intended to address. •COMMENT _ Not withstanding that every land use amendment request is different and has its own context, merits and faults, it is easy to envision the One Naples approval being used for future “redevelopment” projects within the Gulf Shore Drive neighborhoods. Referring to the Gulf Shore Drive Redevelopment Sites Exhibit 10 there are 12 potential redevelopment sites that can possibly benefit from the precedent created by the One Naples approval. It can be argued that One Naples approval will be transformative. It is more than likely that the One Naples approval will be used for future Gulf Shore Drive density increase requests whose impacts have not been anticipated in the Collier Growth Management Plans land use and transportation planning horizon projections. Final Opinion _ Community Character and Compatibility Impacts Please refer to the Opinion Letter’s Project Overview section 6, the Building Height Compatibility section findings, the Community Character and Waterfront Impacts section findings, and Exhibits 1 through 9. The application has failed to demonstrate how the map Page of 27 29 Potential Redevelopment Site Built In 1988 _ 10686 Gulf Shore Dr. Monte Carlo Club Condo. 400 Flagship Dr. The Regatta w./180-ft. +/- Setback 8787 Bay Colony Drive, Trieste At Bay Colony w./145-ft +/- Setback 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) amendment and zoning will create a “high quality mixed use development that is complimentary to and compatible with the surrounding development”. The One Naples Master Concept Plan and development standards will create a non-complimentary “hard- edge” Miami-like coastal urban resort building form, defined by tall buildings with narrow setbacks and negative pedestrian streetscape attributes. Page of 28 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) The request is in contrast to the Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhood context. Adjacent neighborhoods are defined with a “soft-edge” suburban form, with more moderate building heights and code-compliant setbacks. The application’s objective to “create a desirable mixed use development by bringing related activities closer together”, is not supported by the too-narrow setbacks, too-tall buildings, and a dead streetscape designed at a non-pedestrian height, bulk and scale; it lacks a pedestrian-friendly streetscape. The project will negatively impact neighborhood character. The use of large monolithic structures are contrary to good contextual development design. The project’s dual street fronting 40-ft tall parking garage/podium setback 15-ft, or the project’s 525-ft long 87-ft tall waterfront building with zero setback, present height, mass and bulk neighborhood compatibility impacts. Conclusion It is the authors opinion that approval of the subject One Naples FLUM Amendment and companion Planned Development zoning is not logically supported by data, analysis and accepted professional land use principles and practices. The application did not perform accurate and requisite analyses as per 163.3177(6). Information including a factual neighborhood building height study, other neighborhood planning studies, architectural elevations, streetscape and waterfront cross-sections is required to establish community character and neighborhood compatibility findings. The application did not provide meaningful justification. An approval of the March 27, 2020 application will not be logical, predictable and fair. It is factually evident that project’s Master Concept Plan and accompanying density increase, building height increase and reduced development standards will not be compatible with, and complementary to the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code and in violation of Policy 5.6. The amendment and zoning are internally inconsistent with 8 objectives and policies of the Collier Growth Management Plan and Land Use element and in violation with FSS 163.3177(2). The map amendment and zoning violate professional fairness principles and planning practices by granting a unique and special privilege to the applicant that other Gulf Shore Drive owners may or may not enjoy, or that will be used for future Gulf Shore Drive density increase requests. The application is not necessary and fails to demonstrate any type of land use planning deficiency which it is intended to address. I look forward to discussing this issue with you in the near future. Sincerely yours, Greg Stuart, MUP CC:Craig Kasper, Jim Cleveland, Bill Oliver GS/projects/20030/20april20stuart_One Naples_Opinionletter Page of 29 29 9.A.2.r Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: Greg Stuart 4-26-20_OneNaples_OpinionLetter (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 850 Park Shore Drive Trianon Centre, Third Floor Naples, FL 34103 Direct Dial 239.649.2714 PHONE 239.649.6200 FAX 239.261.3659 rpritt@ralaw.com WWW.RALAW.COM April 28, 2020 Via E-Mail only Mark Strain, Chair mark.strain@colliercountyfl.gov Collier County Planning Commission Leo Ochs, County Manager leo.ochs@colliercountyfl.gov Jeffrey A. Klatzkow, County Attorney jeffrey.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov 3299 Tamiami Trail E, Suite 303 Naples, Florida 34112 Re: Naples One –Stock Development Vacation Petition—202000000368 PUDZ Application—PL20190000697 GMPA Application—Small Scale Amendment Dear Administrative Staff and Planning Commission: This Firm represents Regatta at Vanderbilt Commons (Regatta), a Property Owners’ association for the Regatta Developments located very near the proposed One Naples Development by Stock Development. That development consists of a Petition to Vacate a street, a Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to create a sub-district specifically tailored one development, and a Planned Unit Development Zoning (PUDZ) to effectuate the Developer’s plan for development. Regatta opposes the development as currently proposed. Regatta has engaged an expert Planner, Gregory Stuart, and an expert traffic engineer, William Oliver, to review the applications. Their preliminary analyses and conclusions are attached. 9.A.2.s Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: Regatta at Vanderbilt Commons Oppose 4-28-20 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) April 28, 2020 Page 2 Additionally, the undersigned has reviewed the applications and believe them to legally incompatible with the existing development patterns in the neighborhood (external incompatibility), inconsistent with the compatibility requirements of the GMP, illegal spot zoning, inconsistent with transportation requirements, overly dense, exceeding compatible heights (in places), and harmful to the safety and welfare of the immediate and surrounding neighborhoods. As currently proposed, Stock now wishes to accomplish the following (inter alia) (There is a redline Exhibit B submitted showing changes from earlier submittals.): Principal Uses 1. Multi-family residential and/or hotel units not to exceed 172 total units. 2. Up to 10,000 square feet of the following uses: a. Retail; b. Restaurant, eating and drinking establishments; and c. Personal services. d. Professional Office. 3. Marina, limited to use by residents and guests only, except that a maximum of 4 slips may be leased to charter boat vessels and including the following uses (open to the public) limited to a maximum of 1,000 square feet: a. A ship’s store;, limited to 1,000 square feet and b. Marine fueling facility may be open to the public accessing the site via the water. B. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Hearing Examiner or BZA, by the process outlined in the LDC. Development Standards Building Heights—now 208, 182, 77 & 55’ Setbacks—0-to 30’ The Developer makes the usual arguments: a. That it is going to be real nice (luxury). Response: Of course, being luxury for the future buyers does not make it nice for the surrounding neighborhood and is at expense of the neighborhood. b. The Current Commercial zoning in the area is worse. Response: This is a common threat and is factually incorrect. C-3 standards are compatible with the community character and allow for appropriate density, height and setbacks, and lead to less traffic disruption. The neighbors are willing to take the chance that development under the current 9.A.2.s Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: Regatta at Vanderbilt Commons Oppose 4-28-20 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) April 28, 2020 Page 3 zoning will yield the same or better products for the overall community with much less density, height or traffic disruption. c. There will be no traffic problem. Response: The traffic situation is untenable now, and any increases in density in are certain to add incrementally to the traffic. The County should require the scope of the traffic analysis to include the effect on Naples Park in general, since there are virtually no sufficient arterials to serve as outlets for traffic. Additionally, the proposals for reduction of traffic (such as improvements to the parking garage) are insufficient and are things that should have been done anyway. d. The proposed development has been scaled back. Response: This is also a common developer’s strategy—Take a purposely outlandish initial proposal and “graciously” reduce it to a still grossly intense proposal--to make the subsequent proposal sound reasonable. A grossly overbuilt development should not be approved on the false notion that it is less onerous than the original proposal. For some reason, it has worked in Collier County, but it should not. e. Finally, any review is severely hampered by the lack of architectural design information. Developer has freely shared designs with the news media, and likely County decision-makers, for public relations purposes, but not for actual permit approval. We assume that it intends to withhold that information until the site plan review, but one cannot expect the neighborhood or decision- makers to assume that the project is compatible and complementary to the neighborhood, without seeing a design package, especially since the neighbors will have little to no input at the administrative stage. For these reasons and others that are in the attachments, and for reasons that will likely come up during the analysis, Regatta requests that the County review staff, the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners reject the applications, Very truly yours, ROETZEL & ANDRESS, LPA Robert D. Pritt Enc. Stuart Analysis Oliver Analysis Cc: Board of Collier County Commissioners--burt.saunders@colliercountyfl.gov Collier County Community Development Collier County Zoning Division—ray.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov Collier County Department of Transportation 14986508 _4 118525.0005 - 4/28/2020 4:22:56 PM 9.A.2.s Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: Regatta at Vanderbilt Commons Oppose 4-28-20 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) To Mr. James Sabo, Principle Planner, Collier County Planning Commission From: Naples Park Area Association: President: D. Hunter BOD: N. Royal, M. Oenick, B. Chapman, S. Grace, F. Lombard, M. Lucanegro, F. Murrin, D, Privitera, M. Straight, J. Myers, J. Rohleder https://naplesparkareaassociation.org email: NPAA4U@gmail.com RE: OneNaples PL20190000697 and PL20190000696 We are sending this letter to express the concerns of the membership of the Naples Park Area Association (NPAA) regarding the proposed OneNaples development across from the Vanderbilt Beach County Park. (app #PL20190000697) as well as the Small-Sale Amendment to the Collier County Future Land Use Element (SSAFLUE), [PL20190000696-Exhibit IV.B.1] We appreciate all the County has done and is doing to make Vanderbilt Beach and other County beaches attractive and accessible destinations for County residents and visitors alike. We appreciate the transparency of the planning process and our ability to participate in that process. We believe the current land management plan is sound and current zoning regulations provide for development that fits the property and protects our County’s environment. At the January 2020 regular meeting of the NPAA, the members outlined the following issues and concerns for the ONENAPLES proposal: ● Project demands multiple variances to current County requirements for: o Building height o Buffer zone/set-back o Various landscaping/green space requirements o Sidewalk/bike-lane/pathway requirements for setback ● Project is inconsistent with allowed residential density (2.5 times the current requirements). That density will be coupled with additional daily density and traffic of the proposed hotel and commercial space. ● Lack of adherence to current zoning setback requirement will further complicate safe and reliable Vanderbilt Beach access for bikes, and pedestrians ● Lack of ability to widen Vanderbilt Beach Road or Gulf shore drive will further complicate the traffic flow from US 41 to Vanderbilt Beach County Park ● Lack of ability to widen Vanderbilt Beach Road and current planned egress from the OneNaples property will promote more congestion getting to the parking garage and to Vanderbilt Beach Road. As traffic builds the cut through of traffic to the lights at 91st and 99th Ave will increase and impact safe travel for pedestrians and bikes and children going to the elementary school. ● Increase in traffic and lack of access to the beach will impact the attractiveness of Collier County as a tourist destination. ● Increased water traffic and proposed boat slips will negatively impact the environmental of Vanderbilt Lagoon We ask that the County deny the Small-Sale Amendment to the Collier County future land use element (SSAFLUE) [PL20190000696- Exhibit IV.B.1. Approval of that amendment will change FLUE to meet this specific Developer’s needs and set a precedent for future overly dense developments. We realize Stock has a right to develop the parcel they have assembled. We are supportive of a development that complies to all current (2019-2020) county and local growth management policies, zoning and regulations (i.e. no variances). We appreciate that the review process the County uses to assess new development and ensure healthy growth that will preserve the beauty of the County for County residents and visitors. Be assured we will remain involved in all parts of the process to which the public can participate. Respectfully Submitted, Maureen Straight, Board Member [Civic Committee] for the BOD and Membership of NPAA Please attach this letter to application: PL20190000697 and PL20190000696 Cc: Commissioner; A. Solis 9.A.2.t Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: NPAA Ltr JSabo CCPC (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) I = - ONE NAPLES NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATIONAL MEETING MARCH 3,2O2O a) I I I , _l- lrI }'EE /s -*H- ;1 l-/ 9.A.2.u Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NAPLES Our project team is experienced, knowledgeable, and deeply connected to Naples. Brlao Stock Sto(k DevllopnBnt T II I )\ Kclth Gcld.r Sto.L Dcvrlopn nt I a ch.lr rohBon Stock Dcwlopmcnt I Claudlnr L.g!r-W.tzrl Stock D.vclopmlnt I BobHall CGHJ Arcilt.ctg -EI F E Chrls Mitchel ,RE EnBlnc€rlrB I I I a KrlstinaJohnion JRE Erginee.ing Rlch Yovrnovlch Collman, Yovanovlch & 1(o.3t.r, PA. I E gob Mulhcr. Holc Monte. I EI a ? Tina Mccain Mettr Gr.vlnr,9nlth, M.ttc & Arnold = -i NE PROJECT TEAM I A \I I JlmBank JMB Tr.nsportatlon n ) I il 9.A.2.u Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) =E:H'us * rE=-9o6?sEf..P +E'!>-c JJ'= = .E'= Ex53y; i PE g Ei$E E i g rt s ;.? EiE; gEc;E IIi : E E iEf lIi:'H iEIelEiH ! r;-r."Has i.? E H E6'-y 5'= 1- EEEEs R E EiEI I 5 Etrl,o(JC |! El utfl u.E &'6Ec.}E'E'Aq!{ :, o-at '1,otr=ogEE+ Lrr-isto.9E9,; E sI !E* tt llJ J o. z ft(((( FEH-JI ol-Itl --I9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 705Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) irio Eo ta v o ltooo.= crrc-e := g E E.F; 8,8'TUEE'9:d ;E.Eg.sEE EH g;; ;Elt EEE6E o!,f t .; c =o Itn ITJ J 6. z VUNEYa.tA ft(fi ,\ I9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 706Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) u!o EtEta .ngE htra9ibo(UtE3.Err.O3ftOJFEU b6;E Eo $.e.9o: N€;sb5bo.Ft fl5do t) Lt, Jo z af;<d ((((((( ta.--,r'.ahlvrrYl!l}VA' r .l = t) :TFqtt ln \ I l- T r /\ liNI t -r-.)9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 707Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) tn UJz:o; (((fi lIJ I F !gf EAE Ef:g.g6Lra-P EOO5s.Ff ; f E.EEBg.EEF=lr.-etr.riTEE;E;f E i E t 3€E'Esrr;-bgE;lnEIiEii.q,rrf Ie! E=YgE5,E{ xI5€I;e e E€trl-=-gsF ii,oP'Ei39;LrE .=vtiEgEI E;O E.E. =x EPrE-1,l- q u!zfii.E I E.E€? =E FEifB F E5= -Etr!q-, cL!.=Z.9EH:) gxr .^ ,r'tu i3 RE P=r,L.!OE6o,t€EsOOE 6.E Eo(J9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 708Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EtT tn uJ J o. z (((il oovi-(u6f, E,Eo.O ctl-* T'giE .= .goo_o =G6Qrg d,b fEoo. t -Eg (EG =rAg O6J|! tt o iE C, ,89 E}6gei e,E!o LI ilr ldfo UJ =lrl OE trJ -I 19.A.2.uPacket Pg. 709Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) V-UNEIJ,VAi-0 ((((fi IIJz tn u.t J o. z N /\i nv 7 I \ rfi \ I ) \ r \ tl \ I $ ) I I T ,l l fr,I t\ (9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 710Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9otrlotit tr(u Eo o. Eo -ctI,oo olt C't otr t! o o J' ul a)o tE, oE o oo g ouo o. U' ul J o. z ffi(ilF zo .t'l Efo nv I \ { f rlY h i ll]t(TI u P I I )I'lIt9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 711Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9otrlotit tr(u Eo o. Eo -ctI,oo olt C't otr t! o o J' ul a)o tE, oE o oo g ouo o. U' ul J o. z ffi(ilF zo .t'l Efo nv I \ { f rlY h i ll]t(TI u P I I )I'lIt9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 712Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) zIttt G,lo lulz:o: ft(fiF 'a'ir Il I I ! I I IIr'. \LI \,lB,*- \ III I I 7_E ,lff t9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 713Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) r.rJIz:o: K((fiF t-|1Eii71ItIIIIIt. /'' ,'-, /.L -I 2 II tt ntl!i 1," [.1+ l),:Pj,t it t'r I' t. ffi \\ I{ I ,\l I ],, l i t t..t. t zoa E, :)o I9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 714Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) t lulz;o: ((((il F b,'I I tt t, l) I ir I +.tT*I I'l ?I Flt I r * \It-, tr It:. -;'' '/, rr; ' ;/ {Ih T iL zo 9 G,fo9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 715Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -.eg!.r.4 .1 - rAEE5 Hf {E&Es#.8.gqgbgB.: : '= o) {..} c-EEb.EgE'O ot;l.9i)HEL-7rUl)-qJa)=c-c{E=Eg.S,jE6*.oPauE59h=eeEg:5:gI;=*EyE:s.t i{=o:o')c.i.9crc+J.=PiEe€s3.=(n''$U'IfO -.-ES(t,)(l)_CEE=-i9ts('rEro='t],.c-oer,r9=ELPvr(.)-=.-c,$3iE+ frE-dr tr ; E 3.s E e# E E E EdEsFEtS \4hl=92\(oo)uE!;€ = P X I I AE 3 E -.(JfttCO-+,'-f;!EEe;B =.edrO'uEE B g 3P EEE-F'5-6ECl ..,' i c ui ':5; EiE*.H a' E,'i E .cEU:R8U E u g 6:e.Eo.:'ol€qro(, ttt (J I-t9 (,zzoN z UJ E,d. =U uJ3z:o; ffi(fiF9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 716Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) fl i c)IA =E 0.J+)!_ Et-oJ q) O- rn O)L(ocn(t): l t-. ;s-Es u f;t I O) '{= (E L- \."\J E'6 g B € 5 Eg g v, B ? 3L.'l-)L/-\b 6. . S 6 6=(,o..a.. o- E(I,x LU (9zzoN z lrJ E, E,lU lUil z:.o: K((fiF9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 717Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EfoDu-=#EaX'E 'Ec bsSE E" N:x3'Er Po{fc. EEIE10C\or uE Y(J-LO)=.Eo I br, rtl E u tro l,o i:r.= ala u-6 E>5 =l!)otEV'c:fb9 ur 0,.E CLlro a a lr------------- trZ,N d. I.LJ €o2.6l lr.l oFc{o- lJ.,tn d. LIJ cD O. 98 LJ o..l o LU r\ZdrO<N d. LrJ CO .O>rl LUOUN IJJo d. tJ-l- 9='= o tI (J E E s UN8:5 EEE E $ EE . 3!z.N -9.(!.= ulfsC0 o.. t! b6+. .t- F o=N6r OC' =8o24s3l!- EH,0)cLltl a UJz J UJ I E,o tJ1 - (J IJ.J oE,a- lrJlz:o; ft((ilF dE 55 (!, cLOGtoootr CX /cLE. ( ( ( ( ( d.<o?8 ( 66Nlrllr9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 718Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -?.7-':r_ 9E E tYal..sof d.ai.el.d 6Y lhtt Plol COMMERCE s7REE1- TER \ I--+--1 \ \ \ \ \ t I I I I { i ! dt * .G oI '; I "lrL _Lr -q F q :\ o \r't r,eee r aPr!. Rat L7 3."".#*;:xq#*a+**+'a -----jhza-,:.2----__=.-_ -'ddr:;ar..-...--!#4o.:t =PROJECT HISTORY _ LAND ACQUISITIONNE NAPLES 8 TOTAL TRANSACTIONS: 1. Vanderbilt portfolio 2. Beach Box 3. Beach 8ox Master Lease 4. South Bay Realty 5. Dugan properties 5. Little Mermaid - Murphy 7. Liftle Mermaid - Henke 8. Little Mcrmaid - Hogan EI t s ryii 5 \l R ?5E Ii I l-( f,o ,l /"T.u 5 \ \ \5 :v r Drl!l.ltl.l?I0 T J- SI:1t:ltT d, t., CEN nI'7'7 1 --......--,-.", 9.A.2.u Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) t t Ea05 III a tI a z o. o- IJ.JUzoU trz uJI z;. z ((ftI r1 I/7I-,-/E9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 720Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -o thElEr @ef2.4=s'EE OE E}85dt '= 4 9d=;u LL(E ^tr(6d,YEiEe;3 s =c,^6e9U.g.g S Etr.9 >Ztl€Folo ;B ci PEEgtr.=T'NEE 5E8:E:E}E9rcol!=3fis iP= =ollL o! l! -(J IJ.J E,F E,o co IIlIIz I E,o I - U lJ'J oE,o- v1 ul Jo z ((ftil 7 7 flt a trlDJ tFGEI o-oG o- 4 a t\, .,gj9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 721Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) st Et.q, trPboEE3Etd;EiEb{;9G r.!9 EEts-g roI vtIJJkoo-fz(96ulo (J lrJ o G,o- I E,o 9 - () IJ.J oE,o- .n uJ J o. z K(fi v..zi I a8.E'annEa cJ6Eez!NgE8 E gE r:l 49.A.2.uPacket Pg. 722Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) rI-'-l5l c r lr I I I ) I G III;t L., {t I I I I I )YI * E E ,( tr((ffil z o- lrJF .tt IIJz .n uJ J o. z T 'rl A o" LE I I rt -9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 723Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) IICdI\lt'+-L dFtontL.,-rf I iIitEcTTI.c I I I t a 1 I ( I G { LI Yt c a.\ I ,t I T E \- v |/. a al a ! I It Ta: t rtr t FU LU odo- L!o UJo.oUa lJJIz;o; ru(ilF II rt ,L'l"lI1n I ) -[ ,t I,'+{ I ! I ,"*4* t I I tl: / I -t / ,t Itl,lLt 'kL J11Ill9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 724Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) H ;. I t t EttI] IIa $,a51..,T It\Ifd 0 a I I a I !.D aI,. !I ft( I \ t1. t I$ \ ta I I I { tr -JL E;I (ta U lJJ o G,o- IIo IJ.Jo-o(J lrt, lJJilz;o: ft((( -9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 725Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) il T I \ !\ !S I aI I II Y I I II I ( I I IIrt!3It\.II tladt4 If\^>?l a.'1t I I?'.IfIc Ia 4 T ..., IT!.alr ' I .. r\I U IJJ odo- lJ-o tJ.Jo-oU.t1 ]rJilz;o: ffi(fiE f-F ?I { ,IL / .) E ti \, EE Z, L{ l.\,a'E rrr 0l .c -t li L f.l E I --a-,\ -,' i<l t\t-.t.l t.-Ir "lt-i! \^ {- I.!,: I I ,.1 xr,-,1 I I I \- !a R ,r,(a9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 726Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) I tz I I t a t 1/lIJ =IJ TUF VI Izo IUTz:o: ffi((F II Itll I t EH-T-"rIII f';i Itt t iI : I I II I IffiI e \ il i' il I I ) IId ffiI , I_) Y Ia F !aI , ,. V :. I, f.: I H E t I YI .{2 r-l I II9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 727Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) ci crFi EE:} ,El- *li; Ei ti ffi I (((((w' tn uJ J o z I T lJJz o 7I Ij',rr ffiIffii\\\i:,t,.) ta E lr *i)ao.?<AzY z= r--> 'p I I 16 e il @ ] E o IH I ; 1 ffi E I I H IcgI @ H E ; z o- L UJUzoU ze9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 728Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) lr *E n <lz9r!oz> 'di EEii:?!i g! i!i Eir =tri EiIi ffi z o- cIJ(JzoU z E UJTz:o; ft(fi I14irr t\ t BIEFir \ @ ) 1 @ L i #s: t at) :l I '9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 729Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) o Eo J- EON> ;;o 6'd + =o 6 I =u! y' lJJlz;o: fi(ilE IJ.J LLoE,G E, EJ f ao (,z (J E,o- N I \\- 7 7 \9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 730Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) tGoroot^go =g EL Eo )lt Eoo olts E't otr o Eo '6 !'tr Utoot l!s .9ta ogl Etro Ulo o. z e2 E,fo .n LU J o. z ft((il I ,4L/./ /1 n 4 At\/ \ \ A i \ t I i l t- I lN l,tll{' l,' ^.ltOl:\l )ili5-lv:-/s<l,lll/ ) 4 I .t9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 731Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) rn z lrJ IJJ oE,o- =Fz:f o(J LUIz;o: (((((( F tr!tr IL G |,! 5 t I !9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 732Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) I =COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS _ LANDSCAPINGNE NAPLES r I .t q ,lrt IL I SOUTHBAY DRIVE 9.A.2.u Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) I lIJ do co -FloVI lUTz:o: fi(fi (9zE Uv,oz I tJ) z lrJ UJ oE,o- =Fzf o(J \\A \ \ \ til I a9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 734Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) F; I GULF SHORE DRIVE / NORTH =COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS _ LANDSCAPINGNE NAPLES i- -\ #11 .11 tITl F tI g tr' -.ir -- f 9.A.2.u Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) r= ON EI= NApLEs =Ilr I COMMU NITY IMPROVEMENTS - LANDSCAPING ,la ! -- GULF SHORE DRIVE / SOUTH 9.A.2.u Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) I ON E=COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS _ LANDSCAPINGNAPLES Hh n,,-l(q &iio*.. bE,ln -- VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD 9.A.2.u Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) I l { - a VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD =COMMUNITY !MPROVEMENTS - LANDSCAPINGNENAPLES I :i tu I*rut Jru a B. ,l I ,t 9.A.2.u Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) LU3z:o: ((((((( F .J1 zlIJ lJ-, oE,o- =Fzf o(J9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 739Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 'l____sII L z !Jl f;EEt EEIiEi tt, =lIJ(f -ra I V) z UJ IJJ o&o- =Fzl o(J 1rIilz:o: K((fiF tz#E-t I L A I I t) / r /t .i *; e2 EiI It EA9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 740Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) tJ1 z UJ LU oE,o- =Fzf oU lJJlz;o: K((fiF o r! oI lo .YE =o1' l; or o G !trI \r9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 741Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 7LIIiI I l* ! 5 E c' 3 rltt!z UJ\z co I tJ1 zlIJ UJ oE,o- =Fzf oU 1rIlz:o; ft((fiF tg !A'.!,!\!L.t.II\l.1\Idr t-lh & El!,t .# I- r a I TI 7 t 8 aI &a 79.A.2.uPacket Pg. 742Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) g'c C,t olu 3A *t! 3q,t,6 gl trEo !Eo t r/'t zlII t-rJ o&.L =tzf oU .n Llr J o. z ((((((( F lltz o o G oJ 6 i f.r9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 743Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) tI E E :€"€- (9ztr-(9 J IJ.J IJ.J E, tn I 1,r1 z lrJ lrJ oE,o- =Fzf o(J lJJIz;o: ffi((fiF T Ib&),!:,.1 { L f um I , I I t I IrEtBEiliri .t^>a I,,rl !',,, I I a& UI ET 79.A.2.uPacket Pg. 744Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) tt, z lIJ lIJ o G,o- =Fzf oU lrJlz:o; K(ilF !r glc C'! o 0, ti otrr!J oI iE zt 3op th E,lE ILo !tr G9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 745Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) t-*tt I tII,f - I I aalo- I tt1 z lrJ ul oEo- =Fzf oU lUrz:o: ft(fiF E 9 I I I J \ II--L lr ,i rl1I tr l-*..!"i/fi-; 7i4f"4 I I I a II..;? I-\ rt I;'.1 ,i I[' V9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 746Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) tt, z lrJ UJ oE,L =1-zf o(J lUTz;o: ((((fi F co t! oo. tco ! =4 glc or o 0, ti a o lE oI lo IE 3c,t,ti trl .Ero !c G9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 747Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -g|!Eclt.9EEg:oL:oE' (, EN :.Ep E e.i'!'=ut I IatE =gBo,';f EEF E&.,E lJ P zo l_k E,oo-tt,z d. lrJ3z;o; K(((F9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 748Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) .J' lll J o. z zo t_ FE,oo-tttz E,l- ft((il ln lrJo E(9 o.3b 1 -t 7' :i. I: : trlttdE H U7)4 -t .ti1l: Il-rr l. ri;* It r.1 ,EHL-l-lF ! ii \ ''1 \ ir\ I 7 7 r!9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 749Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) zo t_ *<E,oo- v1z E rJJlz: z (((((il E,.l /E! ,- \ \r \+ \ I u \ ,/ ) \, \ \ \I \I\V \\ \ t\ ! I u9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 750Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) zo l_k G,oo-rnz E,F urz;o; ru(fiF f,Jh'l Ilr|(, zIrh IIJ (, G (, (oz Vt CL J z : Ft 1l "ti r, i'i 1 rl I ( -t ) )1 t \I/I L r ': irl9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 751Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) zo l_ E G,oo-tt1z E, ]IJ3z:oi ft((fiF t-//I , I Il I IE 7 /T H /r! g i.,=n ! It I o Ia hs 19.A.2.uPacket Pg. 752Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) F. 2 =a.s62E b;HoroE6oo- ,6 q) d. ooooo UI CLa-LF E troa-vI )T'ot st$ (! EtroT' o 0c ,; (!'tr Lo E-E0! -9o9 o E.E =oiud G',9(I, (!.= Zo t_ 3Eo o_v)z E lrJIz;oi (((((( F ,'i11.TT I \ !: I 7 t .c,o. q. F o- E6- o\ f, o 0)6 f Ec po oeo 6- ll, E t! Eq 'i IJJ9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 753Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) vtPtro Ei9troL5+et .3EuD-Looo9(J'E>Y-cP.to..Ed H5?oo5-E.Et>.s f, n(uoc.::BO=ELEeEEP88,r aaaa lJJlz:o; K((fiF f, i.- --.::!1n."1.,.4kiS 'l 'T * 1 * rl rJ Zo -k &o o_ (,/)Z e9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 754Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) a a o(Jo@\CL+,-0,C;Ef r'i OEE:U.Ep E =l!EoooUEIUr r-tJ oZN-rO<N 99-;.=;0, sEe E =eE Ir<ait. E€eb94tbtgg. d.LrJ Pozc! lr-l oFNo- LUtn c .9ta UI e.bE!.q,q;L-traO., EY =E-lrE _E !-{ualu Jo dNo-o<N E'AoE2.o c=E- .9, Ao* oolrxcc tr'Eoo: iDgEE d.<o:) c-lgR tJJ1I UJz JIJ F (9zzoN lulz:o; ft((fiF - 3H9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 755Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) duo sNF -\J.= E ZNEE { E..Et!t -9l/rh< E(,qo-a --a oE9ol+,=qo, LEo-=UF. VI LU-@liz E9 26 rl tro+'U = ?9 (!= th9o tn[.tJ -tt*d.z-oo> -$N troL'9o u! 0,cco.!UF E, -- -,z.Nso5Ntn -g(!{-, (/) (5qJ u, o- e. :ds ZN -t uJ3z:o: K((fiF IJzIJ F- (9z tr EJ\z G, od ttlul tn zotrUf E, tt1zoU {9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 756Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) .n u! J o. z ft((fi odo 7 nvI// t1 v! o g lt r,{,o CL vtolt o o .E G o o o E'Io gl tr I o 3 o o o = til ) I rNi ',:/ 1,.1 \.J idtf:l;4\l ulo -:) (, tno {l.]t --I I il l fr ( t $ rrrthr) Irl ,r.fl E a a \9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 757Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Eo Ito o. Gzoco J 3 3 G o!- UIlto 3 o t5 ou) lEg o- (9 =o(J E,o rn\Zz I q uJ J o. z ((((fi nt T \ A \i \ L il a i) ?2'ti F-l E IIt'l [ *, \ @?) l-lLJil NFii2 ,d - E. \ \ I \ I \ I E C9.A.2.uPacket Pg. 758Attachment: NIM One Naples Powerpoint001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PL-2O19OOOO596) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-20190000597) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY a..PLeaSe be AdvlsLd..* The informetion on this sheet is to contact you regardinS this proiect and future public meetin8s. Under rlorida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certaln home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. you have the option of checkin8 with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiect as well as checking the county Web site for additlonal information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address oL.\-<)-Lt Vc 3-l t'(at lits a?z l.-b7 3 \e //) V7 /03,//08 L-tCD Ao/,LI C to 'b el"a ,.l (,a t a|c e ,/n---r2t\a?(t-^t 4^ L) L q L 0 3 (r 5{,( \\ i ( 1--be rt-A .'---t 'E-> .\lar2-'3-arc) t -R-,aL d-L L-t t C Svto r al l, rr i(,<'l 6r- rt K-*1r.,._,q1/5 SrJt lc )?(!) L 31 1., I (.6J\:i ho"4- ' A(rt q ,t\ I (o '<rl .'r! &t?olO (l \ 1! I (i1 r i * 3.,k < ()/^ 1lp-o,, 7 FZ<t\\ (\\ *L,\' +\ ". + f nt \ *.o.'.\ I 77c ( &J{'(!^,,.Q,:u+& 1*,lla (o.ot. urtl o 31-t6 1.,.,.1 € <{.-..\--L1 Lu> -6,-^-" ---,-- \J-lLo? 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PL-2O19OOOO696) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL_20190000597) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ...PLaa.,e ba a dvLecd.., The inlormation on this sheet is to contact vou regarding this proiect and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certaln home addr€sses are publac records once recelved by a government agency, lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone numbet or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet, you have the option of checklng with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiest as well as checking the county web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address A -L () Ao ^.eA a V 5 .1 fitz <- 1/1 D0ut t o ,rt €- ).,l 4 o;1 ?&tr G 3uo 5 U CIR_)-lt-,t-et^c,7 ^4.-1.&rr'pA A R.N APLE T f€6 .c$ a 4 c.,L.<'a. l" /08 dd52r "3 ^/ w 4 )Jl.U 0 Gr \> l,? ntrr-l L^/{, j. 6{-/*t"*k3? 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDTSTRICT (pL-20190000696) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-20190000697) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY 'r*.P[,Ast be ad\rlsao|** Th€ information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certaln home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. lf you do not want your e-mail addre5s, phone number or home address releas€d if the county recelves a public records request, you can refraln from including such intormation on thls sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiect as well as checking the county Web site tor addltional information, Name Address City, State Zi E-Mail Address 2- __l 2-,\,S trL (f k(aA lerizo,,t .,b"<Le { tr 9 .L!, L^* t )L L a,ll:U \:'),.n ;CL qzLt cU\,1/3qa tlr-Ln D ctLtgL G,: 1 Dr-e3 34ra'l l9(1.-IL\ Cou*c(ro *,-(-! .[ ...r26a /A,///: L Q,r 56 ga^J ff a76'Q(ql r.\I\o Io<**.l 3ttA)*V-) t@ Ar, ffio&37et lsil. c..,*c,^x@CA lf/A"i r,.ie-LCVN)L0N\t luann C @ it r( + LJ 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD TNFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PL-2O19OOOO696) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-20190000697) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30pM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY *.*pLaase be a dvt<,. drr\ The information on this sheet is to contact you regardinS this proiect and tuture public meetinSs. Under Florida law, e-mall addresses, phone numbers and certair home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. lf you do not want your e-mall add ress, phone number or home address released if the county receiv€s a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. you have the optlon of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiect as well as checking the county web sit6 for additional information. Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address id:>(.lsE{t 0 3u 3 I \\)4 tab4\lj*c /r 4o/,a e 'ir!UQt.can )It{''t- rDS r\Lr d \.\.) .q S-D a..F{-r-,-r-'--N)s.ert Zo -+-r-l Aue N.s *qr of A!-.-L -I l'l-Y..ro trt-.n ]xJ Ae*rL ! U il 'r-''r3znJ ok n n ILtoEZ_rbrtt li c2 C alo '7 al 11"'oy 5 +<.(( (,| C71/ ru 4 /-,7.ta t'tl /J ) /,.."-r,,rZ 'S;ttl/ a> 1 Vx \ at) A ttz--a4.,ao r, Name I q rlno ) 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PL-2O19OOOO696) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL_20r900006971 TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30pM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY .ltF,Leasc ht advtt ed*I* The information on thls she€t is to contact you regarding thls project and future public meetinSs, Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agencl. lf you do not want your e-mall address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such lnformation on this sheet, you have the optlon of checking with the county staff on your own to obtaln updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. c C Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address 4.?0 x/ 1 (./y'€.e n-4 rtbl " NrlfrRc, c, uLa fq(2 /^'3{roE L.--r'h Zb0 i"a-,tz oa .s-ct 7-c17c q-tl,c '.''1,,3 Cl-e,utl ga6 to&11. -co'..^/5 bn o f,)<, . Bo '2 qa3 !'l tt 1 -t3 (;.(,, r (--h: y-',o-J e rljr KJ-K th/'/( 1$ 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PL-2O19OOOO595) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL_20190000697) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY +r*Plrast ba acL\/L<cd ttI The information on this sheet is to contact you r€garding this prolect and future publlc meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government aSency. lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. you have the option ofchecking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on lhe proiect as well as checking the county Web site lor additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address 5r.zoo l'77tr IA DC€il4 ,vz ?'l@ab r4-?u Mol\.vn r*1r I o85'€olu l((laora D""r,v (h..>ry iA e) fio\ L: +LA(4 U <, 4fts€5J,,/LL a LE r\A --i HO\JC flVE r'.)APL* 3 o OSr.7ls A-u<oJ,,o1<e / la- t 1rK€ -iu,c R_s3 g€A (Fl vt^L,rc /,t R_Nt^P 3tlo I (.^ k..Q*".r^^icOm-1n C rt14LT1 NO 3i'0 A3 r( O S7-t t,,.'-'-rrr,4/.eS ?VtSu ) /<LFL @ 4ot-.Oa4 beeaetU. O LEY r#t<tdb9"o 4 5 h pw 3v/Ct &t,*@ Qol , <rt Lrr^0/. E*t-a-,nt 6+t t y'Mc tv '3+lo8L zr) rn ref'.ala ) ;,/1 Eq_ I col (-- rl rS D* .a_r \tr 6rQ 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PL.2O19OOOO595) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pl-201900006e7) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY I * rl>Lease h r- fi (trV1.,, d *' r The inlormation on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and futu re public meetlngs. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbersand certain home addresses are public re€ords once received by a government agency. lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such lnformation on this sheet. you have the option ofchecking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the ptoject as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address rO IA g ,tlu CLU\7A a a 4 tl Q.,t'lta r3ft nr Surz-i+tct TLoDr J ekar L,.ldr,pZn t23l tt Lo< 4 L4e ll)1t too A 5 a 75 taL,,1- n/l 3 c C.!1r"tL ul Ft 4- h!4ob ,zlVr lo r5 e-r Lc .-r 6 n lr A7{,r)4^,3v IL'8 CoA tr4 lor ( \1 e^ (<y p 6oo cos-{.,,re l 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) "'r>1.o se bL ad,vLscCr'. The information on this sheet is to contact you rega rding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbersand certain home addresses are public records once received by a Sovernment agency. lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on lhe proiect as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. Name Address , State Zipc E-Mail Address ,r' a (Yks , r-)t-\+34LOV S \C,f,ol . c.oc-J o 24i QutF )ltoef -Nt\e 3lcL/t CoL!i .,/ .ctael( Et0 cK -ADr I 'lS ?t r O3 r (a u, . c NJ \\)?3 C ?1ro+)b>62-/<t( c //LY Ll /0t\,sJ 4,+ i-o,r C.in /t 't'trr,2s 1?C;t Cda,a 4tL. L,t "4th l/DELt(ftN/l t o9(r-r+rqt {€l)d,@ t)tt'Ca I NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MrXED USE SUBDTSTRICT (pL-20190000696) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-20190000697) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY q-- 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (pL-20190000696) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-20190000697) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY **.t>LcAse he a dvlsedltl The intormation on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mall addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public recotds once received by a government a8ency. lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refraln from includin8 such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiect as well as checking the county Web sit€ for additlonal information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Addressl'ilLa.'-hLW-570 ,/O?6-4uc A/ota'l/,/o j-'-S"fri;lo LJ ilil'rk qA35 c,,lf 51,,,.'D.,3!/Dt -72 f.gr-+-f ttc- 'R e:t4 Fta.ccLl,n Dr #YC8Ll 00 aqtoS lr{r (l rt^, *'Rrl?^- t-/sk/loe/ (,,,)r<fnn" DP.3?tox Ptrport 4 r *{o-+,,t,an,n, C ict l{tnuJ'o*/? B!,-A-G.-QP A\tq 37raE L-ee.h L,.-Js"a .g Gc- ,t"*. Ht **'/ ulo.ss 1 S''5 r't' ftih I l^ataT otttrtt '{6t <tlro /llt< K fto e- ,+ cz. . co2 /tr- 'r7;r/, ft 5?r to/rfl nJL ^/oetq 3 t,.4 * /2, t7,t ; ( l, ls 7 &'t.s',.t, {*_., .Zrrr/zJ b ta {t {)v<-U-Pit, Cpl\a..|'.{-1-t I CN ,r4,^Lf tu t /1* <' (M lt uls{,fio Z/D-.J,a frira /1"',1 5o/^ ,i Vt r(0 a'k* r, i /r.^, li.rt "r-11on *Lst \os k)x+{er€!*6*s )i\ral t IG< r\Q w \t\N\a Ao ( MG,Dtrz'Zrhr bqq rspturff'"f't,zcl l08 bv rkfn tt* o1 .,^;,jor rr_ 71>;1q?e Ula/*I-Gql qe,A Aue f/14 toi .l m'\^/ alg I!#;,- >th*, <:tkt tin!.,b9(o'l,z;13t")I <)g?Y IU 2.)s a) Drwca fiLsn>^.u-'Uif C^J( $<*'- ),t )/ro {Brliff.,>,..o- e- fr-t^ fo*f\ ctr t:r^ \,\ 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PL-2O19OOOO696) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL_201900006971 TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30pM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ,. apLaa !,c ha a dvL<ed +, r The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this proiect and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public r€cords once received by a government agency. lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. you have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiect a5 well as checking the county Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address //UJ ac o orL it^ 2-8r.-o 4a P(rd. IIet),r 2 "/t ctlt,te'L Otrt/t g,/OA.,/,r^,/ 6,i-/1'J 4i 6t /24r. 7. 1"o ud clke-4/3na6^*<k.-..(z) t- u dIr,LTI (-,N- Itc,g l)< \.)etr/Nq ns:9t,,.sI r bL^gi\L-\a€v-e, *\,,J}tav,--..\YT Q2-^-a4la Lpa-S Ac'a@ad I t/i b t -5l1 <4-4tL.o.+> f.-r- th /t\.J en-(-Ir LL 4rL p.-c-o % i 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PL-2O19OOOO596) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (PL-2019000069A TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30pM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY r t.pLca sz bt a clvLsed., * The information on this sheet isto contact you r€gardingthis proiect and future public meetings. Under florlda law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public record5 once rec€ived by a government agency. lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. you have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiect as well as checking the county web slte for additionat information. Name Address City , State Zi p E-Mail Address fRtc0tlt t$6 u4l ,/t frtcoZQ- AtL, Co C ,| Tt".*L L'Jla c h o /|s€rq\\rro u!'t-oloo'nd,ral birr , Co Y1'!Ie Qaral affs-llTers 4ve-r)r'h a/a4,c*@ ,ncl / "(, o ,P AuLf--Cr 8, Rt C<"i(?, Q F ct)r,,.a,tL,":( u,4ctb ()Ou/-f 0 rc--vett\A,)4)r* ' # n1 9"r *t .<4a\(r'-*tu..-i y'Lfirl /tsY14, AA-F- Gsu:ovor - r.az" Cot"0 Yt**/ PilF D(.r"i.ur 06yAAtc..r,:iP,a,o- \P"..h-,lttr Dr"^"-d L?<r*,-'Nc,uoU.C ft-4n ft"al,a &.a.<,tt f tu.l)t? _) ,FL ,1 n rt D.A4d Na+*s trc T l/ 1,4 a.r^" fit,-{-a,t,t .r aAeL(,Ualo,os trt //zenttl**6)n,ztt .a4ta/r,,/n-,7/i:/4)2,, t L,n, o 7:=... O,,*:8,,^-J Eo N.-p-Ar.>1.--0b/, 7q i nC, .n,,7 ) < AL'DL \ €L 3t+tor Pl5$rh.veJr<13ilc/.^-e*-"'i',lo)/.r'F/ zr/r^ 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PL.2O19OOOO596) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-20190000597) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ll.PleasL V)a advLged tt, The information on this sheet is to contact you reSarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government aSency. lf you do not want your e-mall address, phone nu mber or home address released if the county r€c€ives a publlc records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiect as well as checking the county web site for additlonal lnformation, Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address r Y{l',1 a r a rsha-?e-a,zL 7o s ?74 *z-*)4/"/€-sFL .-f ,4 Co <-r7 ) dzzT ll \l l/tl , LCI,.,vflcl vJt t+,k .9e kxtel,-t-r^.-<rD -/'frtr-)l tes YL3 ( i"l ,rA lt' {4,/u*P t("f L s <L/c.P .1 t n Gom (<l v G-\/( r tt-{ thfrtk' r 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PI-2O19OOOO696) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-20190000697) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30pM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY *|,I,Lea!,e be advL<ed'., The information on this sheet is to contact you .€garding this project and future public meetings, Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phonenumbersand certain home addresses are public records once received by a Bovernment agency. lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. you have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the p.oiect as well as checking the county Web site for additional information, Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address L.17t €ow TN tYrtr p A /r'?'V.<-- Fr (C Li 5 c, r-c ltr s4t--00 cfll.r,-- A!,( l/ a La C5 s . (< f,4// 6a .t d& J?.5 oLt- ,/e rl ?Le5 L.La>. ?( \\N\.ilf ccn h\f 7n u-,ltle4.! ,q'c 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBTLT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRTCT (pL-20190000696) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-20190000697) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY .r.pLaasa be a dvLsLd,i.t The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this prolect and future public meetings. Under Florlda law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a Sovernment agency, lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public tecords request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. you have the option of checking whh the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiect as well as checking the county web site for additional information, lot- l.-\ e* ,,i Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address f4 23f cc"lc 4,rc Va /,.+ )lrtT -..< t ec--t1r> // //,/? ><..t 3"t.{k (a/*LU cl /0sL{ztz3tuLF SilOP.E JVlr.tS kn.,rtobAltt$G V+w, o lor3 u14 @-ot,I u,^- 3 \j)1 hol ('ct't d-i Q ra-/t e SS t B/oe/', ll ,4".*,t 7 d(3 o 6<ier'-O(e I . <:,n^ o\ AT,bfrIET 2oPtj A"-/P 34 tot,Q)14 c,45)-. /)o h DUSUA A<r l, . Lo \}v v 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PL-2O19OOOO695) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-20190000697) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2A20 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY '.rPlaasa ha a dvLseilr.r The information on this sheet ls to contact you regarding this proiect and tuture public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addtesses are public records once recelved by a government a8ency. lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records tequest, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. you have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiect as well as checking the county Web site for addltlonal information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address m^,lL1 ,/Y ?th 9l C) lo J-v7 ? ?tl L 'Qn,L ta" 2-(at< Q Wx <? /-/ cb 7.6/1.'<-24,244'/ 1-,L*ac;5 "t q' q Lt D Zq D ,-/t++o ,( a l]'l- ,n 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (pL-20190000696) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-207900006971 TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ,a,PLaa sa bt advLged.rrt The information on this sheet is to contact you regardinS this proiect and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addressesr phone numbers and certain home addresses arepubllc records once received by a government agency. lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option olchecking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiect as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address Lt-I'zloer IttflX+tk tsz hAv'v'tew Ar,€\,! k(Vs Btr>NAgo-kou'cot4 $t 5 q u /vn h L<1 Q,h-+t bl aq ,(4rr<-n/lv"L+: l0'1-,16I Ld-rne t@ A./u/-t Om^N)tl'/,,^' a-et a-/' .?c-c atllc c t'"il /"--t f1'e,1 );, f,a'g ti Go\[.-, r,i Lo yL) An tC kA?Gr,{gT)Ni 5q1 q+E Auo^ru{- r\-,l,r o r r r n5La (}-.,";e c!,4c4,a tl DtrID,1 l.r IL /"-o4 tu< (cM /j r8 Name qft, 1,. -)*,-,- )1,194- I as- u -4*l-/-&/-r"r\r, fula ha u a-a^lg lfu- rr-rr--*--ffii k..,.,ln.n Yatat, 6 t(n"g-th lJo*,1'- l7q Sai-r.wt - b*qila Qiu r U '^Ifllbnrrc*v 7e4S /.,Lk.Ao*U"t/,'r/U,otl- //;.-/-) i2*- Lkrs J o rl ApLzt 6L i<r o I Wl04ll$tLx pto,fl&st.4?r4;i. -L".,-.pt(Noq/-, ;l Aan*+* \-Gzih4/^l 'e= /bb\"7/M ft-l ll.dt,'Po^oo-.-Gr*r'{*Frr- 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PL-2O19OOOO696) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-20190000697) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY *'rP[cAs, be advL<ed *], The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetlngr. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are publlc records once received by a government agency. lf you do not wanl your e-mall address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from includlng such information on this sheet. you have the option of checking with the county stalf on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address I 96n s3{...f. RL+tr:a 34r34 \. ,/j ,/Z-Z .t-,f'Z ,.t /64ry -7f2,// 4.€ zc-,eg,7r,l J e./')C.\€-- =--l oaJ €FA-ES 3.rt o 8 C r,vrn r'* "AQ.d-<:\-AQ(J\S ! lcne- .S ,-"r .:\ a,>-1at Q.'n 5\e g.-m(\- I \ d t6 --LB \^esr t)\e#D %>ao l\y R_?6aA tY{zt-\<U 9.'L.?) N-1h6.Wrery Ut6tr)itlcrf|/e 5 +wonaEfe"t@ffi J o -rta 7 --71i A,/",{? t,v a ' $o.rtu', " -fuf, *[[z V s <' /r/ ." .;-t C </t t(€ .-q - \;;,\.;A\< ,I Y .7{d- =-//1 j ld ,' \\fi.(t'i <i Y6<e,v brE{s 3:11 lr\ e&Nr At-tr Z4t pLE,f r+REA/E)4e-Nr F t?r-o.rU l' tc! tllk?tb ktDte 31/ 1d'rt b+.,t b r Nep legscltd 4e e,t t CA.."n' n f&,t/", / u s t-t{zlBl"rJT 6iql \ tQ./l, #".Wi \h6wl C4rod d uvzt 'd-x;Q (,c- a rt s+ 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDTSTRICT (pL_20190000696) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-20190000697) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY .a.PLcak ba ad.vLsad..l The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this proiect and future public meetlngs. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. It you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released it the county receives a public records request, you can refraln from includlng such informatlon on this sheet. you have the option of checklng with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiect as well as checklng the county Web site for addltional information. (i71 A) 4 '+/- Y v h1 Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address u-rr I OOre 0 -.1lncrl1lpO-\eiS lA ---btLob n(_g-/l FL rrlftCo t^v mFa 5 1qv qqvh ,'l lokNrcts-,dc 9tss 1 a C T1Cr1t|L{ g \( qfc I r v a-th )t G I,(,o a,q- C,UAu*3,L?/oo, C{,?tro7N t\{c l^" C\L. r-" 51'oo D iJ r,l tc o4 3l to J Lc. v(EIn( I ,L {sgBast r"Aoi, n e Lr) Z-C 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PL-2O19OOOO596) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL_20190000697) TUESDAY, MARCH g, 2020 AT 5:30pM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY l.rpLcase be advLc,ed *** The information on this sheet ls to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings, under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers andcertain home addresses are public records once teceived by a Sovernment agency. lf you do not urant your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refraln from lncluding such information on this sheet. you have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiect as well as checking the county Web site for additional informatlon- D Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address Ln. [tI Gucr >lut pkl c,f Fc)qp I /{5I tuEr6tuoo K r)t\ (,, L-3,4 u1"t4D t(B t"/to."U'AtLy'AA 1 ir< dC 3 <r*-cr-D<-/<^-i).--7 a-3 OB Ja-wers.r3 D l"o /2,'1ta-= i4 .<c'7 o1.r;oS C,-t<tlu.M.,+tasc-=u -->(-..Qs.Q b\s.t S'.\,"- {t4 Ec B-,LA" a- /"^1.-[ou a*1.--L tlz Lt t1ra ,L , C,<\e lr,- h<7 5'l 0 c l4- 53 qb L//a 4,vr"r-OOr\@ 16!-J a G.,, ar\ I Z 0,3 @LU4 lvuooCIV I Ir \<su, ee p e\" @rar&Nr b r r I ,J?t u- f4 ^[, o.J -Fo ,J=d?fi rz grl ti teL,L h- n e 94rno b *)o,) 161q t3'7u.r i,,-,i I L r1 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBTLT BEACH ROAD MrXED USE SUBDTSTRTCT (pr-20190000695) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-20190000697) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY r**FLcasc be ad\lLsed.*. The information on this sheet is to contact you reBarding this proiect and future public meetin8s. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public recolds once received by a government agency. lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county recelves a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. you have the option ofchecking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiect as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address tJ r l\laa-t)a-,t 3 *t'Cl,r, s lrt.*dlev 4lg lrtfl'Atq /t-/.u e4tnKi-aa Cn-;;;e-d*SutoP -t-"-/'1"\-71-deYn 4queQ o/, ca 44 lvl;.'-(se-r 'T?oa-ZoA L-Tiz,*o ,J.',3 *lu,(-rl' ?n a- q 9Qo .-r.-i r-,, o\(C.r Nnnc-v K#erfi 5'12 9bhAr<-I 3.-lto0 _ \4a,ht - 8,14 s3q 1{+f,Nt s4 pV 6nv \leloo d} Srar"aahrfi I ) Ja L<1- b I ?uT \kt*t-tt*:#- lCDils roF f -tl,*zrrrcst r 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PI.2O19OOOO696) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pl-20r90000697) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Name City, Stat€ Zip E-Mail Address la\ tdtJ 1"2't<J €N5r oc,t oVlcLe! i) ar>l . ua'n^ r-p[4.' ..vturt --) -)A--)1\)C".Vr^l,@{-e-Qnnc--+f ' c '!--'cEu ,o,uEr-e*),J**u d 42, d- tc t..PLaasa b, a dvkccltt. The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this proiect and future public meetings, Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses a.e public re€ords once received by a Sovernment agency, It you do not want your e-mall address, phone number or home address released if the county teceives a publlc records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. you have th€ option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checkinS the county Web site for additional information. _ Ad^dre:, /-0 1',r ,1 lld\h,ota ) r-O> E l11c t' t. ,' t-I 51^\ 4t-' n(Jtr_ Nl v /Jofi7.s+'- x)","ia 4i ub zso &ad ^ o^- , )DU Q .- l-'D : r- r'i,,.-Q ,' n\t^n}.- {2o'r') dDti T...,^x; -' () 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) a NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MrXED USE SUBDISTRTCT (pL-20190000695) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-20190000697) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY rrrP[easa be advL.,, da*r The information on this sheet is to contact you reBardlng thls proiect and future public meetlngs. Under tlorida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a Sovernment agency. lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a publlc r€cords requ€st, you can refrain trom includang such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiect as well as checking the county Web site for additional intormation. AddressName E-Mail Address a:. Q7o o F/Prur.*('.'l-o/ 0)<p rD (nrc. LL ,/ tzi fl /1tr... / e.eT(,A l,v LOt*Lwr lr;fi J a r.d <o /- t 706 4cot-.L L,E vy'z tovr slI LsrV { <-)\Nc"0v €1 uc-nuD e{P + s -r{tt Tztd c/, /4prDqrzt)c lz{jtl)OB 4-<b"Ty2'3 lo t I /.x- .2t 1tt'1(ir-,-6- 5 7 I ,r It City, State Zip .--...-.---- 1 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBTLT BEACH ROAD MrXED USE SUBDISTRTCT (pL-201.90000696) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-20190000697) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY r..PLea s. ba- a dvLsed r., The information on this she€t is to contact you re8arding this proiect and future publlc meetings. Under Floride law, e-mall addresses, phone numbers and certaln home addresses are public records oflce recelved by a government agencl. lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public record5 request, you can refrain from including such informatlon on thls sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the proiect as well as checking the county Web site for additlonal lnformation. AddressName City, State Zip E-Mail Address 37 7 l/o."-L+t,Zt A,.*J 2- /L'oraffi/rLlr'<-t-'u' t'(s <-\/-5 <-t,L'r-t t eC <p"f A L.l, t ?11 [d<, ,/q,.p_ *-r e(ruJD({?e./rt<cu'Fat hlraa La^c-- 4/\qa 3r c,{i',no Dx BYlc-aNnr^i c-.1 'r=:--.1 {tteil** l@c --l .nli6o No*ltrvrl"vqA \;<.1 t0r.'(-T,\r\Th'Knn,G irMrQ*no&,r-i'ruce iast 6-zlcD bz Xsz'/D,tu,b GnsLuu.,/y'V 3',/r a F-C1.- /.fiQ Gr LLa-t *eo:z ("2p1Y-,u D,-lsa r ? y/ot laba r.-#,k ,,*,- t>.!-.DAn-a, rv)44 ), ,',, - ? B1;,)iA,- n)aoL 3t/tctS^N,o* Bo\rf,. ob 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBTLT BEACH ROAD MrXED USE SUBDTSTRTCT (pL-20190000695) & oNE NAPTES MPUD (PL-2019000069n TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY rrrT>laa-q, be a d\JL<ad,,. The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this proiect and future public meetings, Under Florlda law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a Sovernment agency. lf you do not want your e.mall address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such Information on this sheet. You have the option ofchecking with the county staff on your own to obtaln updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. {! t-\)o '.-< Address City, State ZipName E-Ma firlAddress S ,?'t tr ll +A/r il ) nvd bLl6 qbtl, A\./c, IU \)6t)v< YL 3U l1V t,atitf/.Nntrts ' 5-, iuE^,/ fERt r.' s Gi3 io3b /1-z P !*rfra- ftSrti €6^A.rt-,cotyl8 s?cl 757 rD 34 urvq- t\Jf2.[ -* rv\(Gcz l,,/-i)-eq:f 1of *pc- /w'f-at ?rrhn t\ $;[ttrrt Oo{ P'utt:L tu N*, ), , ( 7'ti r,t r^.1 llu 0oa ," q q /€/),/,/b"; /,/) Plt tt-+ t-o &Lrd Ail D QEaS t7 4Lu,zl3il) nW-rdtf/zs Sttlo\3-391r@y&, gsJ /o2"'/,/h../5iflc,,r,rc t lfl,kc ,4r/i,r/*a 4./na/o. fi39t4 S O Z e,1n e<) FF I e.rtnol,, o, I !hr,rJ^' n e. + GaocA rx<,t{(,,5 |A*/1ae- il Yvi>lzstuBhr ubos6,6:c"'a;..J(T v\\)\9D ({-',4*z''eital nto3 (ft*oen-g,ur Dvr tt /06 ilnprs R:\l(4 da.,,*uerrrer tb7€-) .)a..- 14,El"oll 1-l l, ctl,tt Avt N No-o?r\ lqip? .tN.t.,+<.t"11 r{ .-) qyyrc.,I. 96,", 6t. td\D. tl . L i: /\ \ /J U,*",{ .l P{e r tfur\ iW i)t=rrtffi y),\ -[,J,Jr_,..,.'^,-b/to f/L$Lh-^ Dt flDz l&o1"" 3lta*LVn tt .tu,ie( I hi]-h 6 t l,</ L! 2D Co{re to**|,, I ,<o,b'\ 34ltt-.,A -l ,>,t, ^N-\-, N 4r\ -) I 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PL-20190000596) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pL-20190000597) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY trtplrasc be advlseda** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this proiect and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numb€rs and certain home addresses are public records once received by a Sovernment agensy. lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can r€frain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the prored as well as checking the county Web site lor additional information. Address City, State ZipName E-Mail Address ftb AEAioaL$tun 0Q 4T bf,Pf-S 2 3/li?o l lisu . rn I lar @uc/ ott . tcv. /orzo \,'&,NDez6,trO.At4yzt+z jY-t 1*',/1 dovw L,l @ l".r,a. v \17,1(7rzta61=^/r4 , 314 |a ^t'8a"?,{waot x\"^ra(a 3'lp8 =fr.l,, r'+)Gt@< l., I *l-f] re \;)' ra-Q ) 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD MrXED USE SUBDISTRICT (pL-20190000695) & oNE NAPLES MPUD (pt-20190000697) TUESDAY, MARCH 3,2020 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY '.'pLaa.,e be a dvL<ed, a t The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this proiect and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certaln home addresses are publlc records once received bya government ag€ncy. lf you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county leceives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtaln updates on the proiect as well as checking the county Web site for additlonal information. Tq'"Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address '-%/tcl ll,, if*t-u-a-rq 9@2ttrrurr-pluk rl )*-lJat-lb +t t ar V 9.A.2.v Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: NIM One Naples SIGN IN SHEET001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 785Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 786Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 3 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 787Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 788Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 5 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 789Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 6 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 790Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 7 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 791Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 8 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 792Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 793Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 10 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 794Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 11 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 795Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 12 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 796Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 13 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 797Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 14 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 798Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 15 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 799Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 16 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 800Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 17 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 801Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 18 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 802Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 19 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 803Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 20 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 804Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 21 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 805Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 22 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 806Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 23 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 807Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 24 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 808Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 25 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 809Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 26 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 810Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 27 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 811Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 28 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 812Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 29 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 813Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 30 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 814Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 31 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 815Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 32 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 33 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 817Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 34 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 818Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 35 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 819Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 36 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 820Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 37 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 821Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 38 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 822Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 39 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 823Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 40 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 824Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 41 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 825Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 42 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 826Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 43 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 827Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 44 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 828Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 45 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 829Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 46 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 830Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 47 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 831Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 48 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 832Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 49 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 833Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 50 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 834Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 51 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 835Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 52 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 836Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 53 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 837Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 54 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 838Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 55 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 839Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 56 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 840Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 57 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 841Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 58 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 842Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 59 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 843Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 60 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 844Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 61 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 845Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 62 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 846Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 63 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 847Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 64 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 848Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 65 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 849Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 66 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 850Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 67 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 851Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 68 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 852Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 69 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 853Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 70 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 854Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 71 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 855Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 72 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 856Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 73 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 857Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 74 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 858Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 75 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 859Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 76 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 860Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 77 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 861Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 78 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 862Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 79 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 863Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 80 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 864Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 81 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 865Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 82 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 866Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 83 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 867Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 84 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 868Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 85 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 869Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 86 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 870Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 87 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 871Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 88 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 872Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 89 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 873Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 90 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 874Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 91 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 875 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 92 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 876Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 93 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 877 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 94 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 878Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 95 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 879Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 96 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 880Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 97 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 881Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 98 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 882Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 99 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 883Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 100 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 884Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 101 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 885Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 102 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 886Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 103 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 887Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 104 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 888Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 105 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 889Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 106 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 890Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 107 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 891Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 108 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 892Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 109 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 893Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 110 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 894Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 111 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 895Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) ONE NAPLES MPUD ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLEMENT 112 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) VANDERBILT BEACH MIXED USE ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLEMENT DECEMBER 9, 2019 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. MARIELLE KITCHENER 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES, FL 34104 (239) 643-0166 marielle@thanaples.com 113 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 897 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 3.0 NATIVE HABITAT 6 4.0 WETLANDS & OTHER SURFACE WATERS 7 5.0 LISTED SPECIES 8 6.0 SOILS 9 7.0 CREDENTIALS 10 TABLES 1- FLUCCS and Native Vegetation 4 2- Native Habitat Preservation Calculation 6 EXHIBITS 1 Location Map 2 Overall FLUCCS Map 3 FLUCCS Detail 1 Map 4 FLUCCS Detail 2 Map 5 Native Habitat Map 6 Soils Map APPENDICES I Historical Clearing Aerials & Onsite Photographs 114 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 898 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use project will tie a number of parcels together totaling 5.42 acres on the northeast corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Boulevard. The lots which were specifically located in Section 32, Township 28 South, Range 25 East, in Collier County are currently occupied by a mix of commercial businesses, restaurants, hotel, multi-family development, marina and open land. Many of the parcels are currently in a state of inactivity or are being used for parking or storage. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing structures and create an updated project that will include all of the existing uses, but also add a public commercial waterfront component. In order to comply with the Collier County Land Development Code Resource Protection section 3.05.07 and the Collier County Growth Management Plan: Conservation and Coastal Management Element Goals 6 and 7, the following Supplement addresses the various environmental issues as it pertains to the proposed project. 115 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 899 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 4 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The majority of the project site is either grassed, paved, or contains existing/recently removed structures. A small operational marina exists on the northwest corner of the site and a few of the remaining apartments along the eastern shoreline are still inhabited by renters. There were also planted trees staggered around many of the parcels which were established to comply with County landscape buffer codes around the parking areas (trees on specific spacing and hedged plants underneath). Most plants onsite were not singled-out specifically because they were installed as buffer and did not constitute native habitat as defined in 3.05.07, but there were exceptions discussed below and in section 3.0 of this document. Native vegetation for this project consists of plants which have naturally recruited along the section of natural shoreline over the past decades. Table 1 below contains a list of habitat classifications according to the Florida Land Use, Cover, Forms and Classification System manual, with descriptions of any code that is not self- explanatory. Table 1- FLUCCS and Native Vegetation FLUCCS Code Description Acreage Native Habitat 1333 Quadraplex Units <2 Stories 0.25 0.00 147 Mixed Commercial/Services 0.69 0.00 190 Open Land 1.83 0.00 194 Parking 1.10 0.00 520 Water 0.02 0.00 1841 Marina 0.40 0.00 322 Shrub- <25% groundcover 0.01 0.01 422 Brazilian pepper 0.02 0.00 426 Tropical hardwoods 0.05 0.05 428 Cabbage palm 0.005 0.005 612 Mangrove 0.04 0.04 740 Disturbed 0.60 0.00 814 Roadway 0.41 0.00 5.425 0.105 190: Open Land (1.83 Acres) These areas were designated as such because they were initially cleared during the 1950s creation of Vanderbilt Lagoon and have either been maintained as grassed lots since or built on 116 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 900 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 5 and recently scraped down (See historical aerials in Appendix I). Any vegetation on these lots was installed to satisfy county building codes for final CO’s or landscape buffers. 194: Parking (1.10 Acres) Some of the areas designated as 194 have native trees present, but onsite it becomes evident they were either installed for CO of a structure or a vegetation buffer per county code and not as native preserve. See Appendix I for photo example. 1841: Marina (0.04 Acres) There is a parcel on the northwest corner of the project with docks which still supports a fishing charter service and a few usable commercial boat slips known as South Bay Marina & Fishing Charter. The marina was more commercially active prior to Hurricane Irma, but much of its functionality was lost with the storm and now it is used primarily for commercial charters. 322: Shrub- <25% Groundcover (0.01 Acres) Common name (Scientific name) Percent Cover Stratum coinvine (Dalbergia brownei) 90 Mid buttonwood (Conocarpus erectus) 4 Can & Mid seagrape (Coccoloba uvifera) 1 Can, Mid & Ground 426: Tropical hardwood (0.05 Acres) Common name (Scientific name) Percent Cover Stratum buttonwood (Conocarpus erectus) 20 Can & Mid silver buttonwood (Conocarpus erectus var. sericeus) 20 Mid coinvine (Dalbergia brownei) 35 Mid & Ground seagrape (Coccoloba uvifera) 25 Mid 428 Cabbage palm (0.005 Acres) Common name (Scientific name) Percent Cover Stratum cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto) 98 Can & Mid strangler fig (Ficus aurea) 1 Mid banana tree (Musa spp.) 1 Mid 612 Mangrove (0.04 Acres) Common name (Scientific name) Percent Cover Stratum white (Laguncularia racemosa) 40 Can, Mid & Ground red (Rhizophora mangle) 30 Mid and Ground black (Avicennia germinans) 8 Mid and Ground coinvine (Dalbergia brownei) 5 Mid Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) 5 Mid 117 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 901 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 6 3.0 NATIVE HABITAT Per the CCME of the GMP (Policy 6.1.1), since the project site lies within an Urban Designated Area minimum native vegetation retention standards apply. This project also lies within the Coastal High Hazard Area and is greater than 2.5 acres in size, so 25% of the native vegetation must be preserved. In the case of this site 25% of the native habitat equates to 0.11 acres (See Tables 1 and 2) and thus is not considered a viable onsite preserve. Under county standards (LDC 3.05.07 H.1.(f)(i)(a and d) and 3.05.07 H.1.(f)(iv.) and following the GMP Policy 6.1.1 (10) we are proposing an offsite monetary payment in lieu of onsite preservation. Table 2- Native Vegetation Retention Calculations FLUCCS Acres Native Vegetation % Required to Retain Preservation Total 322 0.01 25 0.0025 Acres 426 0.05 25 0.0125 Acres 428 0.005 25 0.00125 Acres 612 0.04 25 0.01 Acres 0.02625 Acres (0.03) Per GMP 6.1.1 (8) remaining lands and/or vegetation onsite will not be included in the Native Vegetation totals since they are either planted with county required landscape buffers or were cleared and maintained with the creation of Vanderbilt Lagoon. Open land (FLUCCS 190) along Vanderbilt Beach Road has been maintained in a cleared manner since the 1950s and was used by Collier County in 2005 as a staging area for the construction of the beach parking garage across the street (See Appendix I). 118 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 902 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 7 4.0 WETLANDS & OTHER SURFACE WATERS Due to historical land use the only wetland features were found along a length of shoreline where no seawall was ever constructed. That habitat consisted entirely of mangroves with minor amounts of Brazilian pepper present. In most cases the mangroves were dominated by white mangrove (Laguncularia racemosa) or red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle) depending on the location, but some black mangrove (Avicennia germinans) was also present. Rip rap along the non-seawalled shoreline was sporadic. Ownership of 0.08 acres of natural mangrove shoreline and portions of the existing waterway bottomlands were recently reclaimed by the project under a state Butler Act filing approved by the Governor & Cabinet. Natural shoreline is expected to be filled during seawall installation and for the purposes of structural upland engineering. Likely there will be mangrove and/or oyster habitat created though later in association with water quality improvements and mitigation pertaining to the future marina permitting. 119 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 903 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 8 5.0 LISTED SPECIES No listed species (or nests, dens, burrows, cavities, etc.) were found to be utilizing this site and none would be expected because of current site uses and limited area of native habitat. When federal and state permitting commences the site will be subjected to review for the following species by its location, though none of these species will be an issue for this particular site: • Scrub Jay • Piping Plover • Crocodile • Bonneted Bat (not focal area) National Marine Fisheries will also review for small sea turtles and small-tooth sawfish with regards to future marina plans. Per GMP Policy 7.1.1 this project is not proposing any non-compatible land uses listed therein: Conservation designation on the future land use maps, Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Overlay (ACSC), Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPAs), Sending Lands, Habitat Stewardship Areas (HSAs) or all other policies supported by Objective 7.1. Most of LDC 3.04.01 is not applicable to this project because of the historical uses and lack of habitat for wildlife species. 120 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 904 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 9 6.0 SOILS Soils on this site were designated as 35- Urban Land-Aquents Complex, Organic Substratum according to the Collier County Soil Survey. The unit is described below. (35) Urban Land-Aquents Complex, Organic Substratum- This unit consists of soil materials that have been dug from different areas in the county and have been spread over the muck soils for coastal urban development. Individual areas were black to irregular in shape and range from 20 to 300 acres in size. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Typically, urban land consists of commercial buildings, houses, parking lots, streets, sidewalks, recreational areas, shopping centers and other urban structures where the soil cannot be observed. The depth of this fill material varies from 30 to more than 80 inches. Muck of various thicknesses underlies the fill material, with mineral material under the muck. No one pedon represents Aquents, but a commonly encountered profile has a mixed yellowish brown, light gray, and grayish brown fine sand surface with about 15 percent limestone gravels and shell fragments to a depth of 38 inches. Below this to a depth of 80 inches or more is dark reddish-brown compressed muck. In 90 percent of the areas mapped as this unit, urban land makes up 60 to 75 percent and Aquents makes up 26 to 40 percent of the map unit. Included were areas that lack gravelly fill and may contain layers of sandy loam or sandy clay loam fill. The depth to the water table varies with the amount of fill material and the extent of artificial drainage within any mapped area. Present land use precludes use of this map unit for other uses. On site soil investigation were helpful in determining suitability of vacant areas for dwellings, roads and small commercial buildings. This map unit has not been assigned a capability subclass. 121 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 905 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Environmental Supplement (PL20190000697) 10 7.0 CREDENTIALS Fieldwork and preceding documentation contained within this Environmental Supplement for the Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use project was completed by Marielle Nageon de Lestang of Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. at 3584 Exchange Avenue, Naples, Florida, 34104. Marielle received a Bachelor of Science degree from Alabama A&M University in Environmental Science and has been a Biologist with Turrell, Hall & Associates since 1997 in Collier County. 122 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 906 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Exhibit 1 Location Map 123 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 907 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 016'5 <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE: N 26°15'18.11"N<> LONGITUDE: W 81°49'16.28"W5+6'#&&4'55 <> SOUTHBAY DRIVENAPLES, FL 34108REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg LOCATION 1/25/2017THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ01-23-171622-LOCATION-------------------01 OF 06)7.(1(/':+%1)7.(1(/':+%18588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWSUBJECTPROPERTYKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLES124 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 908Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Exhibit 2 Overall FLUCCS Map 125 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 909 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg 1/25/2017NESW0 60 120240SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg OVERALL FLUCCS 1/25/2017THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ01-23-171622-OVERALL FLUCCS MAP-------------------02 OF 6SOUTHBAY DRVANDERBILT LAGOONCENTER STSOUTHBAY DRGULF SHORE CTCENTER STGULF SHORE DRVANDERBILT BEACH RD19419019414719019419019413331901901333194190133318411451 14158141333SEE SHEET 03FOR DETAILSEE SHEET 04FOR DETAILPROJECTBOUNDARY126 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 910Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Exhibit 3 FLUCCS Detail 1 Map 127 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 911 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg 1/25/2017NESW0 5 1020SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg FLUCCS 1 1/25/2017THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ01-23-171622-FLUCCS DETAIL 1 MAP-------------------03 OF 06422•SURVEY COURTESY OF:••SURVEY DATED:NOTES:•THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYY426612FLUCCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(SF)422BRAZILIAN PEPPER971426TROPIC HARDWOODS380612MANGROVE SWAMPS92TOTAL1443128 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 912Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Exhibit 4 FLUCCS Detail 2 Map 129 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 913 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg 1/25/2017NESW0 10 2040SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg FLUCCS 2 1/25/2017THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ01-23-171622-FLUCCS DETAIL 2 MAP-------------------04 OF 06428•SURVEY COURTESY OF:••SURVEY DATED:NOTES:•THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYY612426322612FLUCCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(SF)322COINVINE645426TROPIC HARDWOODS1688428CABBAGE PALM202520WATER786612MANGROVE SWAMPS1599TOTAL4920520130 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 914Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Exhibit 5 Native Habitat Map 131 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 915 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg 1/25/2017NESW0 60 120240SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg NATIVE 1/25/2017THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JMSPC5/6/20161622-NATIVE HABITAT MAP-------------------05 OF 06SOUTHBAY DRVANDERBILT LAGOONCENTER STGULF SHORE CTCENTER STGULF SHORE DRVANDERBILT BEACH RD19419019414719019419019413331901901333194190133318411451 14158141333NATIVE VEGETATION0.11 ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION.GMP REQUIRES 25%PRESERVATION OF NATIVEVEGETATION. FOR THIS SITE, AMINIMUM OF 0.03 ACRES OFNATIVE VEGETATION MUST BEPRESERVED.NATIVE HABITATPROJECTBOUNDARY132 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 916Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Exhibit 6 Soils Map 133 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 917 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg 1/25/2017NESW0 60 120240SCALE IN FEETREV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1622-VANDERBILT CNTY.dwg SOILS 1/25/2017THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ01-23-171622-SOILS MAP-------------------07 OF 06SOUTHBAY DRVANDERBILT LAGOONCENTER STGULF SHORE CTCENTER STGULF SHORE DRVANDERBILT BEACH RD35CODEDESCRIPTIONHYDRIC35URBAN LAND-AQUENTS COMPLEX,ORGANIC SUBSTRATUMPROJECTBOUNDARY134 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 918Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) APPENDIX I Historical Aerials & Onsite Photos 135 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 919 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 12/9/2019NESW0 100 200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 1952 12/9/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ12-05-191622-3225ONE NAPLES1952 HISTORICAL AERIAL48-------------------01136 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 920Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 12/9/2019NESW0 100 200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 1962 12/9/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:TTTRMJ12-05-191622-3225ONE NAPLES1962 HISTORIC AERIAL48-------------------02137 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 921Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 12/9/2019NESW0 100 200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 1968 12/9/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ12-05-191622-3225ONE NAPLES1968 HISTORICAL AERIAL48-------------------03138 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 922Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 12/9/2019NESW0 100 200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1622-Vanderbilt Waterfront Project\CAD\EXHIBIT\HIST_SHORELINE.dwg 2006 12/9/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:MKRMJ12-09-191622-3225ONE NAPLES2006 AERIAL48-------------------04139 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 923Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Parking area designated as FLUCCS Code 194 on corner of Southbay Drive & Vanderbilt Beach Road (facing south to Vanderbilt) Area designated as FLUCCS Code 190 as seen facing west from the parking lot at Corner of Southbay & Vanderbilt. Currently being utilized for overflow parking 140 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 924 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) ONE NAPLES MPUD ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I 141 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 925 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Vanderbilt Properties Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples,Florida Prepared For: Stock Development, LLC 2629 Professional Circle, Suite 101 Naples, Florida 34119 Prepared By: A•C•T Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. 1875 West Main Street Bartow, Florida 33830 (863) 533-2000 Project Number:17233 June 24, 2016 142 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 926 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) VISION • SOLUTIONS •PERFORMANCE Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida Prepared For: Stock Development, LLC 2629 Professional Circle, Suite 101 Naples, Florida 34119 Prepared By: A•C•T Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. 1875 West Main Street Bartow, Florida 33830 Your Compliance Partner! Report Date:June 24, 2016 A∙C∙T Project No.17233 143 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 927 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATIONS The observations and research conducted in this investigation were based upon methods and procedures in general conformance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Designation E 1527-13, “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments:Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process” and other practices which are customary and typical for the profession. Exceptions and deletions to the Standard Practice are described in detail where appropriate throughout the text. This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was completed under the supervision of the environmental professional in accordance with Designation E 1527-13 (7.5.1). I attest that this report is an accurate and authentic representation of the observations and recognized environmental conditions encountered during the investigation. ____________________________________________ Michael A. Graves, P.G. I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of an environmental professional as defined in Section 312.10 of 40 CFR Part 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the property. I have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. _________________________________________ Michael A. Madonna Copies of the qualifications for the environmental professionals who prepared this report are found in Appendix A. _________________ Date June 24, 2016 Date June 24, 2016 Date 144 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 928 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -iii- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A∙C∙T Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.(A∙C∙T) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Designation E1527-13, “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process”for the Vanderbilt Property located north of Vanderbilt Beach Road and east of Gulfshore Drive in Naples,Collier County, Florida, the site, as described in Section 2.0 of this report. Any exceptions to, or deletions from this practice is described in the Deviations Section of this report. According to the Collier County Property Appraiser,the 18 lots associated with the site includes numerous Parcel Identification Numbers (PIN’s). A complete list of the lots, PIN’s, and legal descriptions is provided in Section 2.2.The lots associated with the site include vacant undeveloped land,a marina with former restaurant/bar,a commercial establishment,single and multi-family residences and residential condominiums.The site lots combined comprise approximately 6.0 acres of real estate. The Collier County Property Appraiser’s Office has classified the site parcels with the following Property Use Codes: Lots 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 16 are classified as 10-Vacant Commercial; Lot 2 is listed as 49-Open Storage, New and Used Building Supply; Lot 4 is listed as 11-Stores, One Story; Lot 6 is listed as 1-Single Family Residence; Lot 7 is listed as 39-Hotels, Motels; Lot 13 is listed as 4-Condominium; Lot 14 is listed as 20-Airports, Bus Term, Piers, Marinas; Lot 15 is listed as 4-Condominium; Lot 17 is listed as 7-Miscellaneous Residential;and Lot 18 is listed as 12-Mixed Use Store and Resident. According to the Collier County Property Appraiser’s Office, Lots 1 through 12, Lot 13 (Units 102, 107 and 110), Lot 14, Lot 15 (Units 4 and 5), and Lots 16 through 18,are currently owned by Vanderbilt Real Estate Holdings LTD, C/O GLC Enterprises, Fifth Street Towers, of 150 South Fifth Street #1360, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402.Independently owned condominium units are located within the buildings located on Lot 13 and Lot 15.According to Mr. Christopher Johnson with Stock Development LLC, the client, only the lots and/or units owned by Vanderbilt Real Estate Holdings,LTD are included in this transaction. 145 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 929 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -iv- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE A∙C∙T completed a records search, on -site reconnaissance, off-site area survey, and interviews with government officials and the site owner. The following conclusions are provided based on the findings of this Phase I ESA: This assessment has revealed no evidence of potential Recognized Environmental Conditions in connection with the site.The term Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs)describes the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products, in, on or at a property due to any release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. Historic RECs were identified during the preparation of this Phase I ESA. The South Bay Marina was identified as a Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) facility with petroleum discharges reported to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) in April 1992 and March 2010. The FDEP issued a No Further Action (NFA) in January 1996 for the April 1992 petroleum discharge. The FDEP issued a Site Rehabilitation Completion Order (SRCO) in December 2013 for the March 2010 petroleum discharge. No further environmental assessment is required for respective petroleum discharges. No evidence was observed of the potential existence of vapor intrusion at the site or the migration of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form from surrounding properties to the site. This summary does not contain all the information that is found in the full report. The report should be read in its entirety to obtain a more complete understanding of the information provided and to aid in any decisions made or actions taken based on this information. 146 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 930 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -v- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATIONS .....................................................................................................................ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................7 1.1 Purpose and Objectives ......................................................................................................................7 1.2 User Contract and Warrantee .............................................................................................................8 1.3 Limitations of Assessment ...................................................................................................................8 1.4 Authorization........................................................................................................................................9 1.5 Access and Additional Information Sources ........................................................................................9 1.6 Deviations ..........................................................................................................................................10 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ...............................................................................................11 2.1 Location and Legal Description .........................................................................................................11 2.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics ........................................................................................................12 2.3 Previous Assessment Data ...............................................................................................................13 3.0 RECORDS REVIEW AND DOCUMENTATION ..................................................................15 3.1 Unmapped Facilities ..........................................................................................................................17 3.2 Local Records....................................................................................................................................17 3.2.1 Key Site Contacts .......................................................................................................................18 3.2.2 Florida Department of Environmental Protection .......................................................................18 3.2.3 City of Sanford Fire Department ................................................................................................19 3.3 Site History and Documentation ........................................................................................................20 3.3.1 City Directory Search .................................................................................................................20 3.3.2 Aerial Photography Review ........................................................................................................21 3.3.3 Property Appraiser Records .......................................................................................................22 3.3.4 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps ....................................................................................................22 4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE AND FINDINGS .......................................................................23 4.1 Concerns from Surrounding Properties Review ................................................................................24 4.2 Other Potential Recognized Environmental Conditions ...................................................................25 4.3 Deviations ..........................................................................................................................................25 5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................26 5.1 Records Search .................................................................................................................................26 5.2 On-site Reconnaissance ...................................................................................................................26 5.3 Off-site Reconnaissance ...................................................................................................................26 5.4 Interviews ..........................................................................................................................................27 5.5 Historical Use Information .................................................................................................................27 5.6 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................27 6.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................28 ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................29 DEFINITIONS ...........................................................................................................................30 147 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 931 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -vi- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE LIST OF TABLES Table 1:Lot #’s, PIN #’s and Legal Descrpitions ......................................................................11 Table 2:Regulatory Database Search Results .........................................................................16 Table 3:Aerial Photograph Review ............................................................................................21 Table 4:Site Reconnaissance Summary ...................................................................................23 Table 5:Adjoining Sites ................................................................................................................25 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1:Site Location Map Figure 2:Topography Map Figure 3:2014 Aerial Photograph Figure 4:Adjoining Properties Map LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A:Environmental Professional Qualifications Appendix B:Collier County Property Appraiser Appendix C:Environmental Questionnaire, Previous Assessment Reports and Interviews Appendix D:EDR Report and FDEP Regulatory Files Appendix E:Historical Aerial Photographs, Sanborn Maps and City Directories Appendix F:Photographic Documentation 148 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -7- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 1.0 INTRODUCTION This introduction establishes the purpose and objectives for the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) described below. It identifies special terms, conditions, and limitations inherent in the methods used to conduct the assessment.Moreover, it describes the relationship between the users and A∙C∙T Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.(A∙C∙T ) and our warrantee that the investigation reflects a commercially prudent and reasonable inquiry to assess the environmental condition of the subject units of commercial real estate. Finally, it contains information on authorizations, access, and sources of certain data used in preparation of this report. 1.1 Purpose and Objectives The purpose of this document is to provide a Phase I ESA for the Vanderbilt property located on Vanderbilt Beach Road,in Naples,Collier County, Florida (site). Activities performed for this Phase I ESA include:a site visit to evaluate the current condition of the site and identify unusual conditions; an off-site reconnaissance and windshield survey of the surrounding environment; a review of historic and current aerial photographs; regulatory research including a review of federal,state, and local regulatory records and databases;review of local pertinent agency records to determine the status of the site and sites listed in the database search as being of concern to the site; and personal interviews with individuals who have knowledge of the site and its use. Users of this report,other than those listed in Section 1.2 of this document, should be aware of the limitations set forth in that and other sections. This Phase I ESA will contain four components, which form the basis of the Phase I ESA and are required to meet “All Appropriate Inquiry” (AAI) into the environmental status of the site in general accordance with ASTM Designation E 1527-13 “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process”. This ASTM Standard Practice meets USEPA requirements under 40 CFR 312. The four components of the assessment are: records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, and report preparation. The purpose of the records review is to obtain and review site-specific regulatory and scientific records that will be useful in identifying recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the site . The objective of the site reconnaissance is to obtain directly observable information from reasonably accessible locations indicating the likelihood of identifying RECs at the site or on adjoining 149 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -8- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE properties. Subsurface and other intrusive investigations are outside of the scope of the Phase I ESA process. Interviews and the report provide the documentation to support the analyses, opinions, and conclusions as presented in the Phase I ESA report. 1.2 User Contract and Warrantee The user of this report is Stock Development, LLC.A∙C∙T warrants that findings and conclusions contained in this report were accomplished in general accordance with methods set forth in the ASTM Standard Practice described above. These represent good commercial and customary practice for conducting a Phase I ESA of a property for the purposes of identifying RECs and contain all of the limitations inherent in the methods which are referred to in the ASTM Standard Practice and some of which are more specifically set forth below. The contractual obligation between A∙C∙T and Stock Development,LLC,is to provide a truthful, overall assessment of the environmental condition of the site and the status of regulatory authorizations. The exchange of information about the site between A∙C∙T and Stock Development, LLC,is unique and serves as the basis upon which this report was prepared. Obligations to third party users are outside the scope of this contract and unauthorized reliance on information or conclusions contained in this report will be at the third party's risk. 1.3 Limitations of Assessment No environmental assessment can totally eliminate uncertainty; however, the ASTM Standard Practice used in this assessment is intended to reduce uncertainty, to lessen ambiguity, and to exercise discretion regarding the environmental condition of the site . It should not be construed as an exhaustive assessment of the site . Future environmental assessments should not be used to judge appropriateness of this assessment based on hindsight, new information, or use of developing technology and analytical methods. Methods used to gather information contained in this report generally meet the standards of All Appropriate Inquiry contained within the ASTM Standard Practice and may be reliable for subsequent assessments, but such reliability should not be presumed. 150 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 934 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -9- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE Although the reliability of information from public documents and other databases are assumed accurate, this assumption is also presumed for information from private sources. If conditions on the site change,or new information becomes available, subsequent inquiries may be necessary. Additionally, as noted by the legal analysis, some substances may be present on a property in quantities and under conditions that may lead to contamination of the site or of nearby properties but are not included in CERCLA’s definition of hazardous substances (42 U.S. c. §9601 (14)) or do not otherwise present potential CERCLA liability. As a result these may be environmental issues or conditions that parties may wish to assess in connection with commercial/industrial real estate that are outside the scope of ASTM Designation E 1527-13 referred to as “additional issues” and the user may wish to assess the additional issues as a “business environmental risk”. 1.4 Authorization Authorization to perform this Phase I ESA was provided to A∙C∙T in the form of an agreement for services executed by Mr.Christopher Johnson,Director of Development with Stock Development, LLC,on May 26, 2016. 1.5 Access and Additional Information Sources In addition, the following information was provided to or collected by A∙C∙T: Site Plan Collier County Property Appraiser Legal Description Collier County Tax Collector Key Site Contact Mr.Dave Starkweather of GLC Enterprises, Inc. Property Owner Vanderbilt Real Estate Holding LTD 151 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 935 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -10- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 1.6 Deviations The scope of services for this Phase I ESA specifically excludes work efforts related to the following items. Lead based paints testing Wetlands delineation Radon testing Cultural and historic resources Lead in drinking water testing Endangered species Testing for airborne contaminants in interior spaces or HVAC Ecological resources Operational or regulatory compliance Health and safety Environmental audit services Industrial hygiene Biological agents Phase II ESA Mold testing 152 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 936 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -11- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 2.1 Location and Legal Description The site referred to throughout this document consists of 18 lots located on Vanderbilt Beach Road, Gulf Shore Drive, Gulfshore Court,and South Bay Drive,in Naples,Collier County, Florida, as shown in Figure 1 -Site Location Map.Based on information provided by the Client and obtained from the Collier County Property Appraiser, some of the lots include numerous parcel identification numbers.Information regarding the site parcels,including the Collier County Property Appraiser Parcel Identification Numbers (PIN#s) and legal descriptions is referenced below in Table 1, and included in Appendix B. Table 1 Lot #’s, PIN #’s and Legal Descriptions Lot #PIN Legal Description 1 79122320000 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK D LOTS 1 & 2 2 79122360002 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK D LOTS 3 & 4 3 79122640005 & 79122640007 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK D LOTS 14 thru 20 4 79122480005 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK D LOTS 11, 12 & 13 5 79120840003 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK B LOTS 1 & 2 6 79120880005 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK B LOTS 3 & 4 7 79120920004 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK B LOTS 5 & 6 8 79121360003, 79121400002, 79121440004, 79121480006, 79121520005 and 79121560007 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK B LOTS 33 thru 38 9 79121600006 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK C LOT 1 10 79121640008, 79121680000, 79121720009, 79121760001, 79121800000, 79121840002, 79121880004, 79121920003, 79121960005, 79122000003, 79122040005, and 79122080007 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK C LOTs 2 thru13 153 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -12- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE Lot #PIN Legal Description 11 79122120006, 79122160008, 79122200007, 79122240009, and 7912280001 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK C LOTS 14 thru 18 12 79120960006 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK B LOTS 7 thru 10 13 79420040008, 7942008000, 79420120009, 79420160001, 79420200000, 79420240002, 79420280004, 79420320003, 79420360005, and 79420400004 VANDERBILT PALMS CONDOMINIUM UNITS 1 thru 10 14 79120280003 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK A LOTS 11 thru 17 15 56050040006, 56050080008, 56050120007, 56050160009, 56050200008,and 56050240000 LITTLE MERMAID, THE A CONDOMINIUM Units 1 through 6 16 79120400003 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK A LOTS 20 & 21 17 79120480007 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK A LOTS 24 & 25 18 79120640009 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK A LOTS 31 & 32 2.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics According to the Collier County Property Appraiser, the 18 lots associated with the site include vacant undeveloped land, a marina with former restaurant/bar,commercial establishments,single and multi-family residences and residential condominiums.The site lots combined comprise approximately 6.0 acres of real estate.The Collier County Property Appraiser’s Office has classified the site parcels with the following Property Use Codes:Lots 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 16 are classified as 10-Vacant Commercial; Lot 2 is listed as 49-Open Storage, New and Used Building Supply; Lot 4 is listed as 11-Stores, One Story; Lot 6 is listed as 1-Single Family Residence; Lot 7 is listed as 39-Hotels, Motels; Lot 13 is listed as 4-Condominium; Lot 14 is listed 154 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -13- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE as 20-Airports, Bus Term, Piers, Marinas; Lot 15 is listed as 4-Condominium; Lot 17 is listed as 7- Miscellaneous Residential; and Lot 18 is listed as 12-Mixed Use Store and Resident. According to the Collier County Property Appraiser’s Office, Lots 1 through 12, Lot 13 (Units 102, 107 and 110), Lot 14, Lot 15 (Units 4 and 5), and Lots 16 through 18,are currently owned by Vanderbilt Real Estate Holdings LTD, C/O GLC Enterprises, Fifth Street Towers, of 150 South Fifth Street #1360, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402.Independently owned condominium units are located within the buildings located on Lot 13 and Lot 15. According to Mr. Christopher Johnson with Stock Development LLC, the client, only the lots and/or units owned by Vanderbilt Real Estate Holdings,LTD are included in this transaction.The Vanderbilt Properties Assemblage (aerial photograph with lot listings) received from the Client is included in Appendix C. The surrounding parcels currently include restaurants, various commercial establishments,a hotel/inn,condominium complexes, and tidal canals (navigable waterway). The navigable waterway ultimately provides access to the Gulf of Mexico.The local land surface elevation is approximately 5 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD), as depicted on Figure 2 - Topography Map. 2.3 Previous Assessment Data According to Mr. Benjamin Albaugh, of Vanderbilt Enterprises, Inc., an affiliate of the property owner, previous environmental site assessments have been conducted on the site, specifically at the South Bay Marina located at 179 South Bay Drive. The previous environmental assessments provided by Mr. Albaugh for review were conducted by Nova Consulting Group, Inc., (Nova). The environmental assessment reports received from Mr. Albaugh include the following: Remedial Investigation Report dated December 31, 2010; Site Assessment Report Addendum dated August 1, 2011; Four (4)Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Events conducted in October 2011 (report dated December 2, 2011), January 2012 (report dated February 9, 2012), April 2012 (report dated May 1, 2012),and September 2012 (report dated September 9, 2012); 155 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 939 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -14- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Event conducted in January 2013 (report dated March 13, 2013); Semi-Annual Natural Attenuation Groundwater Monitoring Event conducted in September 2013 (report dated October 15, 2013); and Natural Attenuation Groundwater Monitoring Event conducted in October 2013 (report dated December 10, 2013). A∙C∙T conducted a review of the above referenced assessment reports during the preparation of this Phase I ESA. The assessment investigations were completed to address soil and groundwater impacts associated with a petroleum release identified during the UST upgrade activities and closure assessment investigation completed by Nova Consulting (Nova)in March 2010.One (1)2,000 gallon fiberglass clad steel tank was upgraded in place with the Tank Tech Phoenix System.Based on the review of the Remedial Investigation Report completed by Nova dated December 31, 2010, the soil samples collected for laboratory analysis were reported below applicable FDEP Soil Cleanup Target Levels (SCTLs). However, specific Volatile Organic Compounds including Trichloroethene (TCE), Isopropylbenzene and Methyl-Tert Butyl Ether (MTBE) were reported above applicable FDEP Groundwater Cleanup Target Levels (GCTLs). Additional site assessment activities were conducted between April and August 2011.Quarterly groundwater sampling events,semi-annual groundwater sampling events and natural attenuation groundwater monitoring sampling events were conducted at the South bay Marina facility between October 2011 and October 2013.Based on the review of the Natural Attenuation Groundwater Monitoring Reports dated October 15, 2013,and December 10, 2013, no petroleum related contaminants of concern analyzed were reported above applicable FDEP GCTLs. All of the assessment and groundwater monitoring reports referenced above were submitted to the FDEP for review and comment.Based on the data and reports submitted for review,a Site Rehabilitation Completion Order (SRCO)was issued by the FDEP on December 20, 2013. Specific site assessment reports reviewed and the SRCO issued by the FDEP are included in Appendix D. 156 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 940 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -15- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 3.0 RECORDS REVIEW AND DOCUMENTATION Information from standard federal and state environmental record sources was provided through Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). Data from governmental agency lists are compiled into one database, which is updated as these data are released. This database also contains postal service data in order to enhance address matching. Records from one government source are compared to records from another to clarify any address ambiguities. The demographic and geographic information available provides assistance in identifying and managing risk. The accuracy of the geocoded locations is approximately +/-300 feet. During the review of the environmental regulatory database,South Bay Marina,located at 179 Southbay Drive (Lot 14),was identified as an open UST and LUST facility. Two (2) petroleum discharges were reported to the FDEP in April 1992 and March 2010. The FDEP issued a No Further Action (NFA)in January 1996,for the April 1992 petroleum discharge.The FDEP issued a SRCO in December 2013,for the March 2010 petroleum discharge.No further environmental assessment is required at this time.The petroleum discharges referenced above are considered to be a Historic RECs per ASTM Standard E1527-13.Copies of the NFA and SRCO are included with the regulatory file information presented in Appendix D. The South Bay Marina facility is reported as an open UST site. One (1)2,000 gallon unleaded gasoline UST is in service at this facility.Additional information regarding the storage tank compliance status is provided in Section 3.2.2. Regulatory information was reviewed from the following database sources regarding possible recognized environmental conditions, within the ASTM minimum search distance from the site. Facilities identified in close proximity of the site parcel are listed below in Table 2. A complete listing is provided in Appendix D. 157 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -16- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE Table 2: Regulatory Database Search Results Facility and Address Distance and Direction to the Site Threat Comments CIRCLE K #8813 155 Vanderbilt Beach Road Site Low This facility located on the project site was identified as a RCRA-CESQG,Facility Index System (FINDS)and Enforcement & Compliance History Information (ECHO) site. No RCRA violations have been reported during regulatory compliance inspections. Based on the environmental status, this facility is considered to be a low environmental threat to the site at this time. BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM 9051 Gulf Shore Dr. N.Adjoining West Low This facility was identified as a closed UST, LUST, Cleanup Sites, and Division of Waste Management (DWM) Contaminated site. One (1)approximate 940 gallon diesel fuel UST for an emergency generator system was reported as removed from this facility in July 1995. During the UST closure assessment soil and groundwater impacts were identified. A petroleum discharge was reported to the FDEP in July 1995. This facility is eligible for State-funded cleanup under the Petroleum Liability and restoration Insurance Program (PLRIP). Site access is currently being requested by the FDEP to initiate the site assessment investigations under the Petroleum Restoration Program (PRP). Based on environmental status, this facility is considered to be a low environmental threat to the site at this time. RITZ Carlton 280 Vanderbilt Beach Rd.Within 250’SSW Low This facility was identified as an AST, UST and LUST site.A petroleum discharge was reported to the FDEP in October 1994. The FDEP issued a SRCO for the release in January 2003.One (1) 2,000 gallon diesel fuel AST for an emergency generator system is currently in service at this facility. This facility was reported as being in compliance with applicable storage tank regulations during the inspection conducted on February 25, 2015. Based on location and environmental status, this facility is considered to be a low environmental threat to the site at this time. 158 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -17- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE Facility and Address Distance and Direction to the Site Threat Comments RITZ CARLTON HOTEL INC. 280 Vanderbilt Beach Rd.~250’SSW Low This facility was identified as a RCRA- CESQG, US AIRS site and as a Responsible Party site.RCRA violations were reported during regulatory compliance inspections conducted in September 1987 and May 2001. This facility achieved compliance in October 1987 and June 2001, respectively.The Responsible Party status is associated with dry cleaning activities conducted onsite. Based on information presented in the regulatory database, the solvent contamination identified at this facility does not extend offsite.Based on location and environmental status, this facility is considered to be a low environmental threat to the site at this time. BAY COLONY LANDSCAPE OPER 8707 Bay Colony Dr.~900’SSE Low This facility was identified as a closed AST site.One (1) approximate 550 gallon leaded gasoline aboveground storage tank is reported as removed from this site in March 2002. A petroleum discharge was not reported at the time of removal and closure. Based on distance and environmental status, this facility is considered to be a low environmental threat to the site at this time. BAY COLONY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION 8700 Bay Colony Dr. ~990’SSE Low This facility was identified as a RCRA-CESQG FINDS and ECHO site.RCRA violations were reported during a regulatory compliance inspection conducted in December 1999. This facility achieved compliance in March 2000. Based on location and environmental status, this facility is considered to be a low environmental threat to the site at this time. 3.1 Unmapped Facilities No non-geocoded (unmapped)facilities were listed in the EDR database. 3.2 Local Records The following agencies or knowledgeable parties were contacted concerning available records with regard to the site and the activities of other entities within the vicinity. As described below, the agencies interviewed do not have records of incidents or environmental violations with respect to the site. 159 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 943 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -18- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 3.2.1 Key Site Contact and Property Owner During the site reconnaissance conducted on June 10, 2016,A∙C∙T met with Mr. Dave Starkweather, of GLC Enterprises, Inc. Mr. Starkweather provided access to the South Bay Marina, the former restaurant/bar associated with the marina, and the convenience store located at the site. In addition, Mr. Starkweather escorted the A∙C∙T site inspector around the lots of the site and answered questions to the best of his knowledge regarding the use of the site. Additional information regarding the site reconnaissance is presented in Section 4.0 and Table 4. According to Mr.Benjamin Albaugh, of Vanderbilt Enterprises, Inc., an affiliate of the property owner,one UST is associated with the South Bay Marina located on the northwest portion of the site. In addition, the site includes commercial (retail) establishments, residential condominiums and rental use properties. Mr. Albaugh indicated that previous environmental assessments have been conducted on the South Bay Marina,as presented in Section 2.3.Mr. Albaugh was not aware of environmental conditions associated with the current use of the site.A copy of the completed Environmental Questionnaire and Disclosure Statement is included in Appendix C. 3.2.2 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Mr.James Standiford, Environmental Specialist,with the Collier County Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Division,Storage Tank Compliance Section,was contacted by email on June 3, 2016 for this Assessment.The South Bay Marina, located on the site at 179 South Bay Drive, is a registered storage tank facility.Mr. Standiford indicated that a Storage Tank Compliance Inspection was conducted at the facility in January 2016. Minor violations were reported at that time, which include not maintaining two (2) years of monthly visual inspections. The South Bay Marina had only one (1) year of monthly visual inspections on file at the time of the January 2016 inspection. In addition, the UST line leak detector system was not able to detect a 3.0 gallon per hour discharge, and the line leak detector system is required to be tested annually (scheduled due July 2016). According to Mr. Standiford,facilities cited with minor violations have 180 days to correct the violations and submit the requested documentation to the FDEP.According to Captain Justin Finch,the tenant/occupant associated with the South Bay Marina, two (2) years of monthly 160 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 944 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -19- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE inspections were previously submitted to the Collier County Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Division for review. In addition, the line leak detector system is scheduled to be tested in July 2016. Copies of the line leak detector results will be submitted to Mr. Standiford once completed.The South Bay Marina facility is required to maintain financial insurance coverage, as a responsible party,to pay for site assessment investigations,as well as the cleanup and remediation costs in the event of a petroleum discharge. Based on the email correspondence received from Mr.Standiford on June 15, 2016,the South Bay Marina facility is currently operating in compliance with applicable storage tank regulations. A copy of the email correspondence received from Mr. Standiford is included in Appendix C. A∙C∙T also conducted additional research through the FDEP Storage Tank and Petroleum Contamination Monitoring (STCM) database. Based on the review of the STCM database, no other registered storage tank facilities are located at the site.The environmental status of the facilities identified in the vicinity of the site is presented in Table 2.A copy of the SCTM database search is included in Appendix C. 3.2.3 Collier County Fire Department Ms.Donna Smith, the administrative assistant with the North Collier Fire District was contacted by email on June 7, 2016 for this Assessment.A∙C∙T provided the fire department with the addresses for the developed lots located on the site.A∙C∙T received an email response from Ms.Smith on June 7, 2016, indicating that the research request would take several days to complete.As of June 20, 2016,A∙C∙T had not received a response from the North Collier Fire District.In the event that A∙C∙T receives a response from the North Collier Fire District, which includes pertinent information related to the environmental status of the site, the client will be notified.The lack of this information does not constitute a data gap per ASTM Standard E1527-13. 161 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 945 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -20- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 3.3 Site History and Documentation 3.3.1 City Directory Search City Directories from 1985 through 2013 were produced for the site vicinity.Former occupants of the site located at 155 Vanderbilt Beach Road include the Ach Store/Circle K Stores and The Beach Store from 1989 through 2013. Former occupants of the site located on Southbay Drive include the following: Fish Finder Boat Chartering;Vanderbilt Beach Marina (South Bay Marina);Tropic Isles Yacht Sales; the Seawitch Restaurant;condominium properties including Little Mermaid, Pelican Villas, Gulfside Motel Apartments, Vanderbilt Palms Condominium, individual names listed at guest apartments and the Haven Apartments from at least 1995 through 2015. Based on the review of the city directories for Southbay Drive, former occupants of adjoining properties include Lagoona Apartments, Barefoot Pelican Condominium, commercial establishments including real estate agencies, and residential or leased apartments/condominium units, from 1995 through 2015. Based on the review of the city directories for Gulf Shore Drive,which is located adjoining to the west of the site,commercial establishments including real estate agencies,cafés/markets,the Beachmoor Condominium,individual residence listings, the Lighthouse Inn, Nature’s Way Landscape Naples LLC,Phoenician Sands Condo and the Lighthouse Restaurant were listed in the vicinity of the site from 1985 through 2013. Based on the review of the city directories,Andara Smile Spa, Hertz, The Ritz Carlton Naples Resort/Naples Resort Properties, Premier Properties of Southwest Florida and individual name listings were listed to the south and east-southeast of the site along Vanderbilt Beach Road in 1985 through 2013. 162 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 946 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -21- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 3.3.2 Aerial Photography Review Available aerial photographs of the vicinity were examined for the years 1951, 1962, 1968, 1971,1973,1985, 1993, 1999, 2006, 2007 and 2010.The 2014 aerial photograph is presented on Figure 3 –2014 Aerial Photograph, and a summary of the aerial photograph review is presented in Table 3.The historical aerials are presented in Appendix E. Table 3:Aerial Photograph Review Aerial Photograph Date Site Comments Surrounding Land Comments 1951 The site is undeveloped with water access to the north. The adjoining properties are undeveloped. Vanderbilt Beach Road is present. 1962 The marina is located on the northwest portion of the site. A residence is located on the north-central portion of the site. Roadways have been constructed in the central portions of the site, which provide access to the site via Vanderbilt Beach Condominiums and commercial structures have been constructed to the west-northwest of the site. A residential structure has been constructed to the east of the site. Canals and land with access roads for residential development have been constructed to the north-northeast of the site. 1968 Little to no change from the previous aerial.Little to no change from the previous aerial. 1971 Little to no change from the previous aerial.Additional development and structures are located adjoining to the east of the site. 1973 Little to no change from the previous aerial. A restaurant (which is not associated with the site) has been constructed in the east-central portion of the development. 1985 Several lots on the north and central portion of the site have been developed with the existing structures. The Ritz Carlton property is being constructed adjoining to the south of the site. Additional condominium buildings are located adjoining to the east and west of the site. 1993 Little to no change from the previous aerial. A commercial building has been constructed on the southwest portion of the site. A condominium building is present on the east-central portion of the site. Little to no change from the previous aerial.The Ritz Carlton property located adjoining to the south is completely developed. The adjoining properties to the west-northwest are developed with existing commercial structures and condominium buildings. 1999 Little to no change from the previous aerial.Little to no change from the previous aerial. 2006 Little to no change from the previous aerial.Little to no change from the previous aerial. 2007 Little to no change from the previous aerial.Little to no change from the previous aerial. 2010 The site is developed as observed at the time of the site reconnaissance. The lots are undeveloped or developed with residential structures,condominium buildings,parking lots,a marina,and commercial structures. The surrounding area is developed as observed at the time of the site reconnaissance. 163 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 947 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -22- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 3.3.3 Property Appraiser Records There was no information in the Property Appraiser’s records that would indicate RECs associated with the current use of the site.Information from the Property Appraiser’s records is found in Appendix B. 3.3.4 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps Sanborn Maps were not produced for the vicinity of the site. 164 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 948 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -23- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE AND FINDINGS The site reconnaissance was conducted by Mr. Michael Madonna of A∙C∙T on June 10, 2016.The site is located within a mixed use area on the Gulf Coast area of Naples, Florida.The reconnaissance consisted of walking the perimeter and traversing through individual lots and parking lot areas of the site.The residential apartments and condominium units associated with the site were not accessed during the site reconnaissance. The A∙C∙T inspector did walk through the South Bay Marina facility, which includes a former restaurant/bar building.A∙C∙T conducted a survey of the surrounding areas from the site boundaries, recording observations, and photo documenting the site and vicinity features.Photographs of the current site conditions are presented in Appendix F. A summary of the site reconnaissance is presented on Table 4. Table 4:Site Reconnaissance Summary Observations Present Comments Hazardous Substances No No hazardous chemicals were observed stored on the site during the reconnaissance. Petroleum Storage Yes One (1)2,000 gallon UST is currently in service at the South Bay Marina located at 179 South Bay Drive on the northwest portion of the site. Other Substance Storage No No other substance storage was identified during the reconnaissance. Stains or Corrosion No No chemical stains or corrosion was observed. Heating/Cooling Yes All commercial buildings,single-family residence, condominium units, residential apartments,the marina sales office building and the former restaurant/bar located on the site are cooled by package unit air conditioning systems. Floor Drains or Sumps Yes Floor drains were observed within the former restaurant/bar located on the northwest portion of the site. Sump areas are associated with the UST storage tank systems located at the South Bay Marina, Stressed Vegetation No Stressed vegetation was not observed during the reconnaissance. Storm Water and Sewage No No storm water retention areas were observed on site during the reconnaissance.However, a stormwater swale and drainage grate, were observed on the southern boundary associated with the South Bay Marina property.Additional municipal stormwater drainage grates and culvert systems were observed within the easements along the access roads associated with the site,which include Vanderbilt Beach Road, Center Street, South Bay Drive, South Bay Court,and Gulfshore Drive.Except for asphalt paved parking lots,building structures on developed lots, and 165 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 949 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -24- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE Observations Present Comments landscaped areas, grass covered the majority of the surface area for the vacant lots located on the site.All of the developed lots associated with the site are connected to the municipal sanitary sewer system.Vacant lots associated with the site can be connected to the municipal sanitary sewer system. Tanks, Pipes, and Vaults No No other petroleum tanks, pipes, or vaults were observed associated with the site during the reconnaissance.A former natural gas line was observed within the former restaurant/bar building located on the northwest portion of the site. Electrical Transformers or PCBs Yes Several pole-mounted and pad-mounted electrical transformers were observed within the utility easement located along the streets and roadways associated with the site. New electric transformers were observed staged on the vacant lot located on the southern portion of the site. The majority of the pole-mounted and pad-mounted transformers observed were labeled as non- PCB containing. Wells No No water well was observed associated with the site during the reconnaissance. Odors No No chemical odors were detected during the reconnaissance.A mold odor was identified during the walk through of the former restaurant/bar located adjoining to the east of South Bay Marina, on the northwest portion of the site. Pools of Liquid No No pools of liquid were observed at the site. Drums No No drums were observed on the site. Unidentified Substance Containers No No unidentified substance containers were observed on the site. Pits, Ponds, and Lagoons Yes No pits, ponds, or lagoons were observed at the site.A navigable waterway is located adjoining to the north of the site. Solid Waste Yes Solid waste is currently generated at the condominiums, residential lots, the convenience store and the South Bay Marina, located on the site. Waste Water Yes Waste water is currently generated at the South Bay Marina,the convenience store,residential apartments and the condominiums located at the site.All developed lots located on the site are connected to the municipal sanitary sewer system.A grease trap system was observed on the west side of the former restaurant/bar located in the vicinity of the South Bay Marina, on the northwest portion of the site. A grease trap system is located near the northeast corner of the convenience store located on the southwest portion of the site. Septic System No No septic system was observed at the site. 4.1 Concerns from Surrounding Properties Review Adjoining properties were investigated from the site during the site reconnaissance.The primary uses of the surrounding parcels were restaurants, various commercial establishments, a 166 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 950 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -25- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE hotel/inn, condominium complexes, and tidal canals (navigable waterway). The navigable waterway provides access to the Gulf of Mexico.A summary of the adjoining sites reconnaissance is listed on Table 4 and shown in Figure 5. Table 5:Adjoining Sites Information Direction from Property Sites Use Comments North Navigable Waterway, a Restaurant and Commercial Establishments Navigable Waterway and Commercial Low Environmental Threat East Condominium Buildings Residential Low Environmental Threat South The Ritz Carlton Resort and Commercial Establishments Resort and Commercial Low Environmental Threat West Condominium Buildings and Commercial Establishments Residential and Commercial Low Environmental Threat 4.2 Other Potential Recognized Environmental Conditions The site reconnaissance of the Phase I ESA revealed no evidence of other potential RECs from the site. 4.3 Deviations The scope of services for this Phase I ESA specifically excludes work efforts related to the following items. Lead based paints testing Wetlands delineation Radon testing Cultural and historic resources Lead in drinking water testing Endangered species Testing for airborne contaminants in interior spaces or HVAC Ecological resources Operational or regulatory compliance Health and safety Environmental audit services Industrial hygiene Biological agents Phase II ESA Mold testing 167 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 951 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -26- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS A∙C∙T Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.(A∙C∙T ) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Designation E 1527- 13 “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process”for the Vanderbilt Property located north of Vanderbilt Beach Road and east of Gulfshore Drive in Naples, Collier County, Florida, the site,as described in Section 2.0 of this report. 5.1 Records Search This Phase I ESA revealed no evidence from Federal and State Agency records and databases of recognized environmental conditions on the site except for the South Bay Marina located at 179 Southbay Drive,on the northwest portion of the site.Two (2) petroleum discharges were reported to the FDEP in April 1994 and March 2010.The FDEP issued a NFA in January 1996 for the April 1994 petroleum discharge. The FDEP issued a SRCO in December 2013 for the March 2010 petroleum discharge. No further environmental assessment is required by the FDEP at this time.The petroleum discharges referenced above are considered to be Historic RECs per ASTM Standard E1527-13. This Phase I ESA revealed no evidence from agency records and databases of potential recognized environmental conditions associated with facilities located within search radii of the site. Historic information obtained from city directories and Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps identified no potential RECs associated with the site. 5.2 On-site Reconnaissance The on-site reconnaissance revealed no current evidence of recognized environmental conditions on the site based on the scope of work associated with Phase I ESA’s. 5.3 Off-site Reconnaissance The off-site reconnaissance revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions associated with the adjoining parcels. 168 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 952 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -27- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 5.4 Interviews The interviews with representatives of local and state agencies, and site occupant/key site contact revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions on the site.Refer to Section 2.3 for additional information provided by the Client regarding previous environmental assessments conducted at the site. 5.5 Historical Use Information Based on the review of aerial photographs,city directories and Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, no potential RECs were identified associated with the site. 5.6 Conclusions This assessment has revealed no evidence of potential RECs in connection with the site. No evidence was observed of the potential existence of vapor intrusion at the site or the migration of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form from surrounding property to the site. 169 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -28- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 6.0 REFERENCES American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Designation E 1527-13, “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process” Environmental Data Resources, Inc.;The EDR Radius Map Report with GeoCheck,Vanderbilt Property,Vanderbilt Beach Road, Naples, Collier County, Florida; Inquiry # 4630846.2s;May 26, 2016. Environmental Data Resources, Inc.;Certified Sanborn Map Report,Vanderbilt Property, Vanderbilt Beach Road, Naples, Collier County, Florida;Inquiry # 4630846.3;May 26, 2016. Environmental Data Resources, Inc.;City Directory Search Report,Vanderbilt Property,Vanderbilt Beach Road, Naples, Collier County, Florida; Inquiry # 4630846.8;May 31, 2016. Environmental Data Resources, Inc.;The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package –Vanderbilt Property,Vanderbilt Beach Road, Naples, Collier County, Florida; Inquiry # 4630846.5;May 27, 2016. Collier County Property Appraiser Office United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute Topographic Quadrangle Map –Naples North, Florida Quad; obtained from National Geographic Topographic Quads software. 170 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -29- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE ACRONYMS AST Aboveground Storage Tank ASTM American Society of Testing and Materials AULs Activity and Use Limitations CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System CERC-NFRAP Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System, No Further Remedial Action Planned CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Coal Gas Former Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas) Sites CORRACTS Corrected Action Report Delisted NPL National Priority List -Delisted EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency ERNS Emergency Response Notification System FDEP Florida Department of Environmental Protection FINDS Facility Index System HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System NPL National Priority List NPL-Liens Federal Superfund Liens PADS PCB Activity Database System RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracing System RCRIS-SQG Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Small Quantity Generator RCRIS-LQG Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Large Quantity Generator RCRIS--TSD Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Treatment Storage and Disposal ROD Records of Decision SHWS State Hazardous Waste SWF/LF Solid Waste Facility/ Landfill Database TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act USGS United States Geologic Survey UST Underground Storage Tank NGVD National Geodetic Vertical Datum 171 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida A∙C∙T Project No. 17233 -30- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE DEFINITIONS ASTM Designation E1527-13 defines a Recognized Environmental Condition (REC) as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on the property under conditions that indicate as existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. De minimis-The term REC is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Conditions determined to be de minimis are not a REC. A controlled recognized environmental condition (CREC) is a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for example, as evidence by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk based criteria established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). A historic recognized environmental condition (HREC) is a past release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). “Property” is defined as the real property that is the subject of the environmental site assessment described in this practice. Real property includes buildings, and other fixtures and improvements located on the property and affixed to land. Fire Insurance Map -The term fire insurance maps means maps produced for private fire insurance map companies (in example Sanborn™ Fire Insurance Maps) that indicate uses of properties at specified dates and that encompass the property. These maps are often available at local libraries, historical societies, private resellers, or from the map companies who produce them. 172 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) FIGURES 173 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 0 10.5 Miles Legend Approx. Property Boundary Figure:1 17233 1" = 1 Mile 17233_Fig1.arc IJT 06/03/16 MAG Site Location Map Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Stock Development, LLC Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida StreetMap USA Date: Scale: ArcMap File: Created By: Project No.: Approved By: Source: 1875 West Main Street Bartow, Florida 33830 P # 863.533.2000 F # 863.534.1133 Pelican BayPelican Bay Naples ParkNaples Park Pine RidgePine Ridge £¤41 ^_ Approx. Property Location^_ 174 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 0 500250 Feet Legend Approx. Property Boundary Figure:2 17233 1" = 500' 17233_Fig2.arc IJT 06/03/16 MAG Topography Map Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Stock Development, LLC Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida Labins Date: Scale: ArcMap File: Created By: Project No.: Approved By: Source: 1875 West Main Street Bartow, Florida 33830 P # 863.533.2000 F # 863.534.1133 175 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 0 15075 Feet Legend Approx. Property Boundary Figure:3 17233 1" = 150' 17233_Fig3.arc IJT 06/03/16 MAG 2015 Aerial Photograph Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Stock Development, LLC Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida Labins Date: Scale: ArcMap File: Created By: Project No.: Approved By: Source: 1875 West Main Street Bartow, Florida 33830 P # 863.533.2000 F # 863.534.1133 Vanderbilt Be a c h R o a dGulf Shore DriveSouthbay Drive 176 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 960 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 0 200100 Feet Legend Approx. Property Boundary Figure:4 17233 1" = 200' 17233_Fig4.arc IJT 06/03/16 MAG Adjoining Properties Map Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Stock Development, LLC Vanderbilt Property Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, Collier County, Florida Labins Date: Scale: ArcMap File: Created By: Project No.: Approved By: Source: 1875 West Main Street Bartow, Florida 33830 P # 863.533.2000 F # 863.534.1133 Adjoining Properties: 1 - Hotel Property 2 - Vacant Commercial Land 3 - Residential Housing 4 - Office Building 5 - Restaurant 6 - Retail Business 321 3 3 1 3 6 1 3 5 1 4Vanderbilt Be a c h R o a dGulf Shore DriveSouthbay Drive 177 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 961 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) APPENDIX A ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS 178 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 962 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Michael Alan Madonna Environmental Site Assessment Project Manager Michael Madonna is an Environmental Site Assessment Manager who has been actively involved in Florida's environmental consulting industry since 1998. Mr.Madonnas’responsibilities have included project scheduling and implementation, managing subcontractors and personnel, equipment,materials and interaction with client and multiple local, state and federal agencies. Representative Project Experience Performed and managed Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments throughout Florida, Georgia,Louisiana, Michigan, South Carolina, North Carolina, Nevada, Virginia,Tennessee, Texas,and Idaho,for the banking industry. Properties have included agricultural, commercial,educational,industrial, residential subdivisions and golf course property transactions. Managed remedial action work at several sites throughout Florida for private land owners, financial institutions, private developers, County regulatory agencies, FDEP Storage Tank, FDEP Waste Cleanup and Petroleum Cleanup Sections. Managed Aboveground Storage Tank (AST)and Underground Storage Tank (UST)Closures. Client Manager for Manatee County Environmental Resource Management Department.Responsible for implementing and managing Phase I and Phase II Environmental Assessments,Site Assessments, Source Removal /Remedial Action Projects. Assisted with Aviation projects. Project Manager Manage and perfo Education Bachelor of Science, In Biology w/ Secondary Education St. Francis College of PA, 1990 Loretto, Penn. Training 40-Hour HAZWOPER Training Ground Penetrating Radar-Utility Scan-Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. FDEP Field Sampling Training Course FDEP Hands-On Field School for Petroleum Contamination Cleanup Environmental Technology Center Sampling Certificates Professional Profile 179 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 963 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MICHAEL A GRAVES, P.G. Senior Professional Geologist Michael A. Graves has provided professional assistance to public, private, and legal sectors during the past 30 years in projects involving hydrogeology, hazardous and non-hazardous waste management, environmental site assessment/compliance audits, geophysical studies, and mineral exploration/economic geology. Hydrologic experience includes groundwater quality evaluations, successful water use permit applications, development of monitoring plans for surface mining operations, wetlands protection programs, abandoned landfill monitoring, municipal well drawdown monitoring, water reuse application studies, and surface water improvement and management (SWIM) programs. Other studies include groundwater modeling to predict potential impacts to local surface water bodies such as wetlands, lakes and rivers resulting from intense groundwater removal, water table drawdown simulations for water use permitting, and mounding/infiltration modeling to predict storm water and treated effluent disposal into ponds and underlying aquifer systems. Quantitative studies include installation of monitoring well networks to determine the degree of interconnection between individual aquifer systems and/or confining units. Other related experience includes dewatering investigations for mining processes, and the evaluation of drawdown impacts among individual wells within a single well field. Hazard and non-hazardous waste related experience includes soil, groundwater and surface water quality assessments, which necessitated the construction and implementation of groundwater monitoring systems, in addition to sediment profiling, soil and groundwater sampling for hazardous and non-hazardous petroleum- impacted facilities. Geophysical-related experience included the use of Lacoste-Romberg gravity meters Models D & G and the Scintrex model CG-3/3M, and the Geonics EM-31 and EM-34 electromagnetic units. Other geophysical studies have included ground penetrating radar units and magnetometers. Due diligence studies include over 100 Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments for bankers, attorneys, land developers, water managements, and citrus growers throughout Florida. Each Phase I ESA was performed in accordance to ASTM E - 1527 standards. Education Ph.D. Candidate, Geochemistry, University of South Florida – present Master of Science, Geochemistry, University of Florida –1986 Bachelor of Science, Geology, University of Florida –1981 Professional Registrations Registered Geologist, Alabama, #367 Registered Geologist, Florida, #51 Registered Geologist, Georgia, #1549 Registered Geologist, Kentucky, #700 Registered Geologist, South Carolina, #534 Certified Professional Geologist - A.I.P.G. #7401 Professional Profile 180 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 964 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Michael a. graves, P.G.(CONTINUED) Appointments Member, UF Dept of Geologic Sciences Advisory Committee 2009-present Member, Board of Professional Geologists -State of Florida 1993-2000 Chairman, Board of Professional Geologists -State of Florida 1996-1997 Advanced Training Groundwater Vistas Flow & Transport Modeling ArcView GIS Environmental Risk Assessment 40-Hour OSHA (HAZWOPER) Mining Safety & Health Administration (MSHA) Selected Publications Age and Composition of a Late Archean Magmatic Complex, Beartooth Mountains, Montana-Wyoming. 1988, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 96, pp. 7-22. Soil Gas and Dissolved Contaminant Plume Mapping. 1986, International Conference on Advances in Groundwater Hydrology, Abstract. Magnetic Total Intensity Survey of Polk County, Florida. 1986, Florida Academy of Sciences, Vol. 49(3), pp. 142-147. Age Compositional and Isotopic Evidence for Crustal Recycling in the Late Archean Arc, Beartooth Mountains, Montana-Wyoming. 1985, Geological Society of America, Abstract Volume 17, NO. 7, p. 754. Professional Affiliations American Institute of Professional Geologist Geological Society of America National Groundwater Association 181 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 965 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) APPENDIX B COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER 182 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 700,000 $ 350,000 $ 85,230 $ 0 $ 85,230 $ 85,230 $ 85,230 $ 85,230 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79122320000 Site Adr.9136 GULF SHORE DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 D 13A32 32 48 25 0.13 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK D LOTS 1 + 2 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/14/07 4197-882 09/26/05 3897-1793 06/16/99 2559-1029 12/04/97 2368-834 07/10/97 2330-549 08/01/86 1213-474 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the FinalTax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/Main_Search/RecordDetail.html?FolioID=79122320000 183 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 700,000 $ 350,000 $ 75,000 $ 1,277 $ 76,277 $ 76,277 $ 76,277 $ 76,277 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79122360002 Site Adr.9136 GULF SHORE DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 D 33A32 32 48 25 0.11 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK D LOTS 3 + 4 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 49 - OPEN STORAGE, NEW AND USED BUILDING SUPP 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/14/07 4197-882 09/26/05 3897-1793 06/16/99 2559-1029 12/04/97 2368-834 07/10/97 2330-549 08/01/86 1213-474 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79122360002 184 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 968 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 2,205,000 $ 0 $ 1,762,000 $ 90,000 $ 171,525 $ 0 $ 171,525 $ 171,525 $ 171,525 $ 171,525 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79122640007 Site Adr.GULF SHORE CT Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREEET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 D 173A32 32 48 25 0.26 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK D LOTS 17-20 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 10/01/97 2351-822 07/19/96 2207-2195 03/04/96 2154-1610 12/15/95 2128-2145 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79122640007 185 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 969 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 2,205,000 $ 0 $ 1,762,000 $ 90,000 $ 135,135 $ 0 $ 135,135 $ 135,135 $ 135,135 $ 135,135 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79122600005 Site Adr.GULF SHORE CT Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 D 143A32 32 48 25 0.21 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK D LOTS 14-16 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 10/01/97 2351-822 07/19/96 2207-2195 03/04/96 2154-1610 12/15/95 2128-2145 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79122600005 186 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 500,000 $ 498,000 $ 175,000 $ 96,700 $ 0 $ 101,880 $ 61,816 $ 163,696 $ 163,696 $ 163,696 $ 163,696 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79122480005 Site Adr.155 VANDERBILT BEACH RD Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LTD % GLC ENTERPRISES 150 S 5TH STREET #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 D 113A32 32 48 25 0.16 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CTR BLK D LOT 11, 12 & 13 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 11 - STORES, ONE STORY 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 11/22/99 2613-3313 05/22/88 1352-2133 05/01/87 1270-821 05/01/84 1083-775 10/01/80 888-1646 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79122480005 187 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 971 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Detail Parcel No.79122480005 Site Adr.155 VANDERBILT BEACH RD Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LTD % GLC ENTERPRISES 150 S 5TH STREET #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Permits Tax Yr Issuer Permit #CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type 1988 COUNTY 87-923 03/04/87 2003 COUNTY 2002091270 12/31/02 Land #Calc Code Units 10 COMMERCIAL SF 6792 Building/Extra Features #Year Built Description Area Adj Area 10 1987 STORE BUILDING 1275 1275 20 1987 ASPH P 4105 4105 Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79122480005 188 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 972 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Collier County Property Appraiser Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Docviewer.html?Doctype=Sketches&FolioID=79122480005... 189 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 973 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 2,205,000 $ 0 $ 1,762,000 $ 90,000 $ 92,910 $ 0 $ 92,910 $ 92,910 $ 92,910 $ 92,910 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79120840003 Site Adr.SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 B 13A32 32 48 25 0.14 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK B LOTS 1 + 2 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 10/01/97 2351-822 07/19/96 2207-2195 03/04/96 2154-1610 12/15/95 2128-2145 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79120840003 190 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 974 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 0 $ 475,000 $ 235,000 $ 225,000 $ 0 $ 75,000 $ 188,369 $ 263,369 $ 263,369 $ 263,369 $ 263,369 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79120880005 Site Adr.210 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 B 33A32 32 48 25 0.11 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK B LOTS 3 + 4 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/14/07 4197-892 09/26/05 3897-1783 12/19/97 2372-2954 04/01/89 1434-1158 12/01/82 1000-111 02/01/79 796-457 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79120880005 191 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 975 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Detail Parcel No.79120880005 Site Adr.210 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Permits Tax Yr Issuer Permit #CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type 1980 COUNTY 79-5196 05/30/80 1985 COUNTY 85-3303 Land #Calc Code Units 10 COMMERCIAL SF 5000 Building/Extra Features #Year Built Description Area Adj Area 10 1980 RESIDENTIAL 2596 3736 Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79120880005 192 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 976 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Collier County Property Appraiser Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Docviewer.html?Doctype=Sketches&FolioID=79120880005... 193 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 977 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 0 $ 430,000 $ 130,000 $ 75,000 $ 74,525 $ 149,525 $ 149,525 $ 149,525 $ 149,525 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79120920004 Site Adr.218 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 B 53A32 32 48 25 0.11 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK B LOTS 5 + 6 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 39 - HOTELS, MOTELS 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/14/07 4197-898 12/04/97 2368-830 09/09/97 2344-3092 01/01/88 1320-939 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79120920004 194 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 978 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Detail Parcel No.79120920004 Site Adr.218 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Permits Tax Yr Issuer Permit #CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type 1962 COUNTY 3511 01/02/62 1984 COUNTY 84-1606 06/12/84 1992 COUNTY 91-1898 02/22/91 2010 COUNTY 0909-0515 ROOF Land #Calc Code Units 10 COMMERCIAL SF 5000 Building/Extra Features #Year Built Description Area Adj Area 10 1962 MULTI-FAMILY 2024 2283 Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79120920004 195 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 979 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Collier County Property Appraiser Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Docviewer.html?Doctype=Sketches&FolioID=79120920004... 196 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 980 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 2,000,000 $ 0 $ 235,000 $ 1,137,000 $ 26,040 $ 0 $ 26,040 $ 26,040 $ 26,040 $ 26,040 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79121560007 Site Adr.CENTER ST Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 B 383A32 32 48 25 0.04 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK B LOT 38 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/14/07 4197-880 03/27/98 2402-1799 01/06/97 2269-4 06/01/90 1535-423 09/01/89 1466-2108 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79121560007 197 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 981 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 2,000,000 $ 0 $ 235,000 $ 1,137,000 $ 27,420 $ 0 $ 27,420 $ 27,420 $ 27,420 $ 27,420 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79121520005 Site Adr.CENTER ST Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 B 373A32 32 48 25 0.04 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK B LOT 37 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/14/07 4197-880 03/27/98 2402-1799 01/06/97 2269-4 06/01/90 1535-423 09/01/89 1466-2108 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79121520005 198 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 982 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 2,000,000 $ 0 $ 235,000 $ 1,137,000 $ 28,275 $ 0 $ 28,275 $ 28,275 $ 28,275 $ 28,275 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79121480006 Site Adr.CENTER ST Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 B 363A32 32 48 25 0.04 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK B LOT 36 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/14/07 4197-880 03/27/98 2402-1799 01/06/97 2269-4 06/01/90 1535-423 09/01/89 1466-2108 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79121480006 199 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 983 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 2,000,000 $ 0 $ 235,000 $ 1,137,000 $ 29,115 $ 0 $ 29,115 $ 29,115 $ 29,115 $ 29,115 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79121440004 Site Adr.CENTER ST Name / Address VANDERBILT REA EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREEET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 B 353A32 32 48 25 0.04 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK B LOT 35 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/14/07 4197-880 03/27/98 2402-1799 01/06/97 2269-4 06/01/90 1535-423 09/01/89 1466-2108 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79121440004 200 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 984 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 2,000,000 $ 0 $ 235,000 $ 1,137,000 $ 29,985 $ 0 $ 29,985 $ 29,985 $ 29,985 $ 29,985 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79121400002 Site Adr.CENTER ST Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 B 343A32 32 48 25 0.05 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK B LOT 34 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/14/07 4197-880 03/27/98 2402-1799 01/06/97 2269-4 06/01/90 1535-423 09/01/89 1466-2108 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79121400002 201 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 985 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 2,000,000 $ 0 $ 235,000 $ 1,137,000 $ 30,825 $ 0 $ 30,825 $ 30,825 $ 30,825 $ 30,825 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79121360003 Site Adr.CENTER ST Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 B 333A32 32 48 25 0.05 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK B LOT 33 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/14/07 4197-880 03/27/98 2402-1799 01/06/97 2269-4 06/01/90 1535-423 09/01/89 1466-2108 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79121360003 202 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 986 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 2,000,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 71,850 $ 0 $ 71,850 $ 71,850 $ 71,850 $ 71,850 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79121600006 Site Adr.239 VANDERBILT BEAC RD Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 C 13A32 32 48 25 0.11 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK C LOT 1 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/14/07 4197-880 03/27/98 2402-1799 01/06/97 2269-4 06/01/82 975-674 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the FinalTax Roll Page 1 of 1 6/6/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/Main_Search/RecordDetail.html?FolioID=79121600006 203 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 987 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 204 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 988 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 205 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 989 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 206 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 990 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 207 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 991 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 208 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 992 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 209 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 993 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 210 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 994 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 211 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 995 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 212 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 996 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 213 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 997 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 214 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 998 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 215 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 999 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 216 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1000 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 217 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1001 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 218 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1002 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 219 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1003 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 220 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1004 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 245,000 $ 110,000 $ 0 $ 115,000 $ 150,000 $ 0 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79120960006 Site Adr.SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 B 73A32 32 48 25 0.23 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK B LOTS 7 THRU 10 Millage Area 164 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 10/01/97 2351-824 03/04/96 2154-1654 06/08/94 1955-1119 03/01/89 1423-2073 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79120960006 221 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1005 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 222 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1006 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 223 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1007 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 224 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1008 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 225 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1009 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 226 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1010 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 227 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1011 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 228 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1012 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 229 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1013 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 230 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1014 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 231 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1015 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 2,205,000 $ 0 $ 1,762,000 $ 90,000 $ 332,500 $ 295,722 $ 628,222 $ 628,222 $ 628,222 $ 628,222 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79120280003 Site Adr.179 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 A 133A32 32 48 25 0.38 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK A LOTS 11-17 Millage Area 174 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 20 - AIRPORTS, BUS TERM, PIERS, MARINAS 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 10/01/97 2351-822 07/19/96 2207-2195 03/04/96 2154-1610 12/15/95 2128-2145 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79120280003 232 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1016 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Detail Parcel No.79120280003 Site Adr.179 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Permits Tax Yr Issuer Permit #CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type 1970 COUNTY 69-990 05/28/69 1987 COUNTY 86-2441 05/19/87 DOCK 1989 COUNTY 89-3879 11/01/89 1990 COUNTY 89-4337 02/02/90 1997 COUNTY 97-2261 08/11/98 NO PICKUP 2002 COUNTY 2002070233 08/07/02 NO PICKUP Land #Calc Code Units 10 COMMERCIAL SF 16625 Building/Extra Features #Year Built Description Area Adj Area 10 1961 STORE BUILDING 1251 1251 20 1988 METAL-STEEL FRAME 3400 3400 30 1990 ASPH P 11000 11000 40 1987 WOOD DOCK 342 342 50 1987 WOOD DOCK 824 824 60 1980 CONC P 432 432 70 1967 SEAWALL 100 100 80 1967 SEAWALL 50 50 90 1977 SEAWALL 25 25 Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79120280003 233 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1017 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Collier County Property Appraiser Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Docviewer.html?Doctype=Sketches&FolioID=79120280003... 234 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1018 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 69,000 $ 0 $ 55,000 $ 265,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 50,000 $ 47,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 112,640 $ 112,640 $ 112,640 $ 112,640 $ 112,640 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.56050040006 Site Adr.181 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address NAPLES WEEKENDER LLC 262 TURNBURY WAY City NAPLES State FL Zip 34110 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 469000 13A32 32 48 25 0 Legal LITTLE MERMAID, THE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1 Millage Area 174 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 469000 - LITTLE MERMAID, THE A CONDOMINIUM School Other Total Use Code 4 - CONDOMINIUM 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 05/01/14 5035-2900 03/19/14 5021-561 11/29/13 5021-558 11/01/13 4980-1708 01/13/06 3965-3032 01/13/06 3965-3030 01/13/06 3965-3021 06/08/99 2555-3484 07/01/88 1365-2108 09/01/84 1102-774 09/01/79 833-941 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=56050040006 235 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1019 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 190,000 $ 99,900 $ 86,000 $ 56,000 $ 285,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 53,000 $ 0 $ 91,040 $ 91,040 $ 91,040 $ 91,040 $ 91,040 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.56050080008 Site Adr.181 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address 181 SOUTHBAY UNIT 2 TRUST 2800 DAVIS BLVD #200 City NAPLES State FL Zip 34104 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 469000 23A32 32 48 25 0 Legal LITTLE MERMAID, THE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2 Millage Area 174 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 469000 - LITTLE MERMAID, THE A CONDOMINIUM School Other Total Use Code 4 - CONDOMINIUM 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/28/16 5256-3839 04/29/14 5038-306 04/25/14 5033-3962 11/15/13 4984-1360 01/13/06 3965-3115 06/08/99 2555-3486 06/08/99 2555-3482 04/02/98 2404-1651 03/01/92 1698-1675 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=56050080008 236 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1020 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 67,500 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 65,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 129,920 $ 129,920 $ 129,920 $ 129,920 $ 129,920 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.56050120007 Site Adr.181 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address 181 LITTLE MERMAID UT 3 TRUST 2800 DAVIS BLVD #200 City NAPLES State FL Zip 34104 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 469000 33A32 32 48 25 0 Legal LITTLE MERMAID, THE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3 Millage Area 174 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 469000 - LITTLE MERMAID, THE A CONDOMINIUM School Other Total Use Code 4 - CONDOMINIUM 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/10/14 5015-1802 01/13/06 3965-3140 06/08/99 2555-3481 05/01/88 1348-2270 11/01/85 1164-1672 05/01/79 808-1597 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=56050120007 237 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1021 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,000 $ 36,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 82,880 $ 82,880 $ 82,880 $ 82,880 $ 82,880 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.56050160009 Site Adr.181 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 469000 43A32 32 48 25 0 Legal LITTLE MERMAID, THE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4 Millage Area 174 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 469000 - LITTLE MERMAID, THE A CONDOMINIUM School Other Total Use Code 4 - CONDOMINIUM 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/14/07 4197-885 09/26/05 3897-1777 06/05/97 2319-3358 07/11/95 2077-993 05/01/91 1612-1597 06/01/87 1278-2206 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=56050160009 238 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1022 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 0 $ 38,000 $ 28,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 62,880 $ 62,880 $ 2,515 $ 60,365 $ 62,880 $ 60,365 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.56050200008 Site Adr.181 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 469000 53A32 32 48 25 0 Legal LITTLE MERMAID, THE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 5 Millage Area 174 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 469000 - LITTLE MERMAID, THE A CONDOMINIUM School Other Total Use Code 4 - CONDOMINIUM 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/14/07 4197-885 09/26/05 3897-1777 06/05/97 2319-3356 09/01/81 936-846 09/01/81 936-844 05/01/76 648-1984 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( - )10% Cap ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=56050200008 239 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1023 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 127,500 $ 0 $ 195,000 $ 0 $ 603,120 $ 603,120 $ 603,120 $ 603,120 $ 603,120 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.56050240000 Site Adr.181 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address HOGAN, DANNY A 27620 RIVERDALE LN City BONITA SPRINGS State FL Zip 34134 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 469000 63A32 32 48 25 0 Legal LITTLE MERMAID, THE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 6 Millage Area 174 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 469000 - LITTLE MERMAID, THE A CONDOMINIUM School Other Total Use Code 4 - CONDOMINIUM 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/15/99 2523-2147 05/01/87 1267-2190 09/01/86 1219-1827 10/01/85 1158-2298 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=56050240000 240 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1024 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 245,000 $ 78,000 $ 95,000 $ 65,000 $ 0 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79120400003 Site Adr.SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LTD % GLC ENTERPRISES 150 S 5TH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 A 203A32 32 48 25 0.07 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK A LOTS 20 + 21 Millage Area 174 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 10/01/97 2351-824 03/04/96 2154-1653 09/01/89 1467-1121 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79120400003 241 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1025 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 436,000 $ 65,000 $ 8,100 $ 73,100 $ 73,100 $ 73,100 $ 73,100 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79120480007 Site Adr.237 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 A 243A32 32 48 25 0.08 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK A LOTS 24 + 25 Millage Area 174 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 7 - Miscellaneous Residential 5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/14/07 4197-888 09/26/05 3897-1762 12/04/97 2368-832 10/01/97 2351-848 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79120480007 242 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1026 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Detail Parcel No.79120480007 Site Adr.237 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Permits Tax Yr Issuer Permit #CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type 1980 COUNTY 79-3213 03/17/80 1982 COUNTY 81-6240 10/18/82 1987 COUNTY 86-2657 05/19/87 DOCK 1991 COUNTY 91-3254 04/08/91 SCREEN ENCLOSURE 1996 COUNTY 96-2477 ADDITION 2002 COUNTY 0511-2506 12/28/05 DEMOLITION Land #Calc Code Units 10 COMMERCIAL SF 2437.5 20 COMMERCIAL SF 812.5 Building/Extra Features #Year Built Description Area Adj Area 10 1987 WOOD DOCK 304 304 Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79120480007 243 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1027 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Collier County Property Appraiser Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Docviewer.html?Doctype=Sketches&FolioID=79120480007... 244 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1028 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) $ 0 $ 0 $ 550,000 $ 400,000 $ 0 $ 280,000 $ 100,000 $ 152,805 $ 252,805 $ 252,805 $ 252,805 $ 252,805 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.79120640009 Site Adr.265 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A32 681700 A 313A32 32 48 25 0.11 Legal VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK A LOTS 31 + 32 Millage Area 174 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 681700 - VANDERBILT BEACH CENTER School Other Total Use Code 12 - MIXED USE (STORE AND RESIDENT)5.48 6.1427 11.6227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/14/07 4197-890 09/26/05 3897-1772 12/19/97 2372-2956 08/26/93 1859-485 04/01/89 1432-1211 03/01/84 1069-117 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79120640009 245 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1029 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Detail Parcel No.79120640009 Site Adr.265 SOUTHBAY DR Name / Address VANDERBILT REAL EST HOLD LTD C/O GLC ENTERPRISES FIFTH STREET TOWERS 150 SOUTH FIFTH ST #1360 City MINNEAPOLIS State MN Zip 55402 Permits Tax Yr Issuer Permit #CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type 1974 COUNTY 73-95 05/28/74 1980 COUNTY 78-3406 DOCK 1993 COUNTY 93-11705 11/22/93 09/20/93 1993 COUNTY 93-12679 10/12/93 1994 COUNTY 94-6011 06/16/94 1996 COUNTY 96-3653 03/27/96 Land #Calc Code Units 10 COMMERCIAL SF 5000 Building/Extra Features #Year Built Description Area Adj Area 10 1974 MULTI-FAMILY 3016 3404 20 1974 CONC P 1500 1500 30 1994 WOOD DOCK 227 227 40 1974 SEAWALL 50 50 Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=79120640009 246 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1030 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Collier County Property Appraiser Page 1 of 1 5/26/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Docviewer.html?Doctype=Sketches&FolioID=79120640009... 247 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1031 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) APPENDIX C ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRES PREVIOUS REPORTS AND INTERVIEWS 248 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1032 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 249 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1033 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 250 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1034 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 251 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1035 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Storage Tank/Contaminated Facility Latitude/Longitude Search 06/08/2016 You selected the following criteria: Radius =1.0 Mile(s) Latitude =26: 15: 15 Longitude =81: 49: 17 Latitude Longitude Facility ID, Name, Address 26:15:04 81:49:05 9601600 Facility Type:C-Fuel user/Non-retail Bay Colony Landscape Oper Facility Status:CLOSED 8707 Bay Colony Dr Cleanup Status:No Contamination Naples, FL County:11-COLLIER 26:15:07 81:49:17 9501375 Facility Type:6-Dryclean-related other The Ritz Carlton - Naples Facility Status:CLOSED 280 Vanderbilt Beach Rd Cleanup Status:No Contamination Naples, FL County:11-COLLIER 26:15:09 81:49:19 9102673 Facility Type:C-Fuel user/Non-retail Ritz Carlton Facility Status:OPEN 280 Vanderbilt Bch Rd Cleanup Status:Completed Naples, FL County:11-COLLIER 26:15:15 81:49:23 9102755 Facility Type:C-Fuel user/Non-retail Beachmoor Condominium Facility Status:CLOSED 9051 Gulf Shore Dr N Cleanup Status:Application Naples, FL County:11-COLLIER 26:15:18 81:49:18 8735785 Facility Type:V-Marine/Coastal Fuel Storage Southbay Marina Facility Status:OPEN 179 Southbay Dr Cleanup Status:Completed Naples, FL County:11-COLLIER 26:15:33 81:49:26 9102756 Facility Type:C-Fuel user/Non-retail Casa Grande Condominium Facility Status:CLOSED 9653 Gulf Shore Dr N Cleanup Status:No Contamination Naples, FL County:11-COLLIER 26:15:35 81:49:26 9102757 Facility Type:C-Fuel user/Non-retail Villas Of Vanderbilt Beach Facility Status:CLOSED 9715 Gulf Shore Dr N Cleanup Status:No Contamination Naples, FL County:11-COLLIER 26:15:40 81:49:27 9102738 Facility Type:C-Fuel user/Non-retail La Playa Beach Resort Facility Status:OPEN 9891 Gulf Shore Dr N Cleanup Status:No Contamination Naples, FL County:11-COLLIER 26:15:57 81:49:29 9300918 Facility Type:C-Fuel user/Non-retail Vanderbilt Bay I & Ii Facility Status:CLOSED 10420 Gulf Shore Dr Cleanup Status:Ongoing Naples, FL County:11-COLLIER 26:15:59 81:49:32 9400162 Facility Type:C-Fuel user/Non-retail Bayshores Of Vanderbilt Beach & Condo Facility Status:CLOSED 10475 Gulfshore Dr N Cleanup Status:Completed North Naples, FL County:11-COLLIER 26:16:06 81:49:33 9102737 Facility Type:C-Fuel user/Non-retail Seville At Vanderbilt Shores Facility Status:CLOSED Page 1 of 2FDEP Storage Tank/Contaminated Facility Latitude/Longitude Search Results 6/8/2016https://fldep.dep.state.fl.us/www_stcm/reports/PCT_Lat_Long_Search_Report.asp 252 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1036 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 1 Michael Madonna From:StandifordJames <JamesStandiford@colliergov.net> Sent:Wednesday, June 15, 2016 9:56 AM To:Michael Madonna Subject:RE: Regulatory Compliance Status for SouthBay Marina, Naples, Florida Mr. Madonna, The facility has performed Annual Line Leak Detection testing which was conducted on 1/14/2016, now due to be completed on or before 1/14/2017. The open violation pertaining to not performing monthly visual inspections has been resolved. A Non-Compliance Letter activity resolves that violation and therefore a site visit is not warranted per Collier County SHWMD’s contract with FDEP. Regards, James A. Standiford IV (Jay) Environmental Specialist Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Division Collier County Public Utilities Department Storage Tanks Program-FDEP Contract GC-690 and County Interdivisional Tanks Program (ITP) 3339 Tamiami Trail E., Suite 302 Naples, FL 34112 Work Cell 239-207-0981 *primary Desk 239-252-5090 Fax 239-252-6690 From:Michael Madonna [mailto:MMadonna@A -C-T.com] Sent:Wednesday, June 15, 2016 9:28 AM To:StandifordJames Subject:RE: Regulatory Compliance Status for SouthBay Marina, Naples, Florida Mr. Standiford, I conducted a site visit on 6/10/16.Mr. Justin Finch indicated that he sent you the information requested and the Line Leak Detector test is due in July.Please let me know if you have been able to review the information and updated the compliance status of the facility. Thank you, 253 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1037 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) APPENDIX D EDR REPORT and FDEP REGULATORY FILES 254 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1038 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) FORM-LBD-DVV ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Vanderbilt Property 155 Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, FL 34108 Inquiry Number: 4630846.2s May 26, 2016 255 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1039 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 48 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5 Physical Setting Source Map A-10 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-12 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC4630846.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS 256 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1040 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4630846.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 155 VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD NAPLES, FL 34108 COORDINATES 26.2544090 - 26˚ 15’ 15.87’’Latitude (North): 81.8217340 - 81˚ 49’ 18.24’’Longitude (West): Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator: 417937.5UTM X (Meters): 2903955.0UTM Y (Meters): 2 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 5652584 BONITA SPRINGS, FLTarget Property Map: 2012Version Date: 5652638 NAPLES NORTH, FLSouth Map: 2012Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20100428Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 257 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1041 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4630846.2s Page 2 C8 BAY COLONY COMMUNITY 8700 BAY COLONY DR RCRA-CESQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 990, 0.188, SSE C7 BAY COLONY LANDSCAPE 8707 BAY COLONY DR AST Higher 922, 0.175, SSE B6 THE RITZ-CARLTON OF 280 VANDERBUILT BEAC RESP PARTY Higher 58, 0.011, SE B5 RITZ CARLTON HOTEL I 280 VANDERBILT BEACH RCRA-SQG, US AIRS Higher 58, 0.011, SE B4 RITZ CARLTON 280 VANDERBILT BCH R LUST, UST, AST, Financial Assurance Higher 58, 0.011, SE 3 BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIU 9051 GULF SHORE DR N LUST, UST, CLEANUP SITES, DWM CONTAM, Financial... Higher 55, 0.010, WSW A2 SOUTHBAY MARINA 179 SOUTHBAY DR LUST, UST, Financial Assurance Lower 1 ft. A1 CIRCLE K #8813 155 VANDERBILT BEACH RCRA-CESQG, FINDS, ECHO TP MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 155 VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD NAPLES, FL 34108 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 258 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1042 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4630846.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: EPA IDDatabase(s)Site CIRCLE K #8813 155 VANDERBILT BEACH NAPLES, FL 34108 FLD984251512RCRA-CESQG EPA ID:: FLD984251512 FINDS Registry ID:: 110007463011 ECHO DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators 259 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1043 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4630846.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS Florida’s State-Funded Action Sites State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Facility Database State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tank Listing INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists FF TANKS Federal Facilities Listing FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land TANKS Storage Tank Facility List State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS Institutional Controls Registry INST CONTROL Institutional Controls Registry State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP Voluntary Cleanup Sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Sites Database ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites SWRCY Recycling Centers 260 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1044 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4630846.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register PRIORITYCLEANERS Priority Ranking List Fl Sites Sites List US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System SPILLS Oil and Hazardous Materials Incidents SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem 261 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1045 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4630846.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 US MINES Mines Master Index File UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing AIRS Permitted Facilities Listing CLEANUP SITES DEP Cleanup Sites - Contamination Locator Map Listing DEDB Ethylene Dibromide Database Results DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Facilities Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing FL Cattle Dip. Vats Cattle Dipping Vats SITE INV SITES Site Investigation Section Sites Listing TIER 2 Tier 2 Facility Listing UIC Underground Injection Wells Database Listing NPDES Wastewater Facility Regulation Database FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) 262 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1046 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4630846.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/09/2015 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-SQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RITZ CARLTON HOTEL I 280 VANDERBILT BEACH SE 0 - 1/8 (0.011 mi.) B5 34 RCRA-CESQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-CESQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/09/2015 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-CESQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BAY COLONY COMMUNITY 8700 BAY COLONY DR SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.188 mi.) C8 42 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Department of Environmental Protection’s PCTO1--Petroleum Contamination Detail Report. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/08/2016 has revealed that there are 3 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIU 9051 GULF SHORE DR N WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.010 mi.) 3 18 Discharge Cleanup Status: ENTD - ELIGIBLE - NO TASK LEVEL DATA Facility Status: CLOSED Facility-Site Id: 9102755 RITZ CARLTON 280 VANDERBILT BCH R SE 0 - 1/8 (0.011 mi.) B4 23 Discharge Cleanup Status: NFA - NFA COMPLETE Facility Status: OPEN Facility-Site Id: 9102673 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTHBAY MARINA 179 SOUTHBAY DR 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A2 9 Discharge Cleanup Status: SRCR - SRCR COMPLETE Discharge Cleanup Status: NFA - NFA COMPLETE Facility Status: OPEN Facility-Site Id: 8735785 263 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1047 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4630846.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. Shortly after the September 11 event, the DEP was instructed to remove the detail about some of the storage tank facilities in the state from their reports. Federal-owned facilities and bulk storage facilities are included in that set. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/08/2016 has revealed that there are 3 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIU 9051 GULF SHORE DR N WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.010 mi.) 3 18 Tank Status: B Facility-Site Id: 9102755 Facility Status: CLOSED RITZ CARLTON 280 VANDERBILT BCH R SE 0 - 1/8 (0.011 mi.) B4 23 Tank Status: B Facility-Site Id: 9102673 Facility Status: OPEN PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTHBAY MARINA 179 SOUTHBAY DR 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A2 9 Tank Status: U Facility-Site Id: 8735785 Facility Status: OPEN AST: Shortly after the Sept 11 event, the DEP was instructed to remove the detail about some of the storage tank facilities in the state from their reports. Federal-owned facilities and bulk storage facilities are included in that set. A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/08/2016 has revealed that there are 2 AST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RITZ CARLTON 280 VANDERBILT BCH R SE 0 - 1/8 (0.011 mi.) B4 23 Facility-Site Id: 9102673 Facility Status: OPEN Facility Status: OPEN BAY COLONY LANDSCAPE 8707 BAY COLONY DR SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.175 mi.) C7 41 Facility-Site Id: 9601600 Facility Status: CLOSED Facility Status: CLOSED ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Other Ascertainable Records 264 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1048 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4630846.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 DWM CONTAM: A listing of active or known sites. The listing includes sites that need cleanup but are not actively being working on because the agency currently does not have funding (primarily petroleum and drycleaning). A review of the DWM CONTAM list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/30/2015 has revealed that there is 1 DWM CONTAM site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIU 9051 GULF SHORE DR N WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.010 mi.) 3 18 Program Site Id: 9102755 RESP PARTY: Open, inactive and closed responsible party sites A review of the RESP PARTY list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/03/2016 has revealed that there is 1 RESP PARTY site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ THE RITZ-CARLTON OF 280 VANDERBUILT BEAC SE 0 - 1/8 (0.011 mi.) B6 40 Site Status: CLOSED 265 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1049 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4630846.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 There were no unmapped sites in this report. 266 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1050 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 267 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1051 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 268 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1052 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250RCRA-SQG 2 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250 1RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LAST 3 NR NR 0 0 3 0.500LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FF TANKS TC4630846.2s Page 4 269 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1053 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST 3 NR NR NR 0 3 0.250UST 2 NR NR NR 1 1 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250TANKS State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PRIORITYCLEANERS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Fl Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2 Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 80 Other Ascertainable Records 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD TC4630846.2s Page 5 270 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1054 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1FINDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCLEANUP SITES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DEDB 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 1 NR NR 0 0 1 0.500DWM CONTAM 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FL Cattle Dip. Vats 1 NR NR 0 0 1 0.500RESP PARTY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SITE INV SITES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTIER 2 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1ECHO 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP TC4630846.2s Page 6 271 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1055 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA HWS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST 15 0 0 0 2 10 3- Totals -- NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC4630846.2s Page 7 272 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1056 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 11/19/1998Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: TAMPA, FL 33619 500 FAULKENBURG RDOwner/operator address: BELIN STEVEOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 11/19/1998Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: TAMPA, FL 33619 500 FAULKENBURG RDOwner/operator address: STEVE BELINOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendarDescription: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 04EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (813) 689-8161Contact telephone: USContact country: TAMPA, FL 33619 FAULKENBURG RDContact address: STEVE BELINContact: TAMPA, FL 33619 FAULKENBURG RDMailing address: FLD984251512EPA ID: NAPLES, FL 341082372 155 VANDERBILT BEACH RDFacility address: CIRCLE K #8813Facility name: 02/03/1993Date form received by agency: RCRA-CESQG: Site 1 of 2 in cluster A Actual: 2 ft. Property ECHONAPLES, FL 34108 Target FINDS155 VANDERBILT BEACH RD FLD984251512 A1 RCRA-CESQGCIRCLE K #8813 1004683943 TC4630846.2s Page 8 273 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1057 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110007463011DFR URL: 110007463011Registry ID: 1004683943Envid: ECHO: affiliation data for the State of Florida. Maintenance (FDM) system maintains entity, environmental interest and Florida Environmental System Today Application (FIESTA) Data corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110007463011Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: BENZENE. Waste name: D018. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: CIRCLE K #8813 (Continued)1004683943 Not reportedFacility Cleanup Rank: (239)597-2063Facility Phone: V - Marine/Coastal Fuel StorageFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: 8735785Facility Id: STATERegion: LUST: Site 2 of 2 in cluster A 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 1 ft. < 1/8 Financial AssuranceNAPLES, FL 34108 UST179 SOUTHBAY DR N/A A2 LUSTSOUTHBAY MARINA U003108508 TC4630846.2s Page 9 274 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1058 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation A - APPROVEDSRC Completion Status: 12-18-2013SRC Review Date: 12-10-2013SRC Submit Date: SRCR - SITE REHABILITATION COMPLETION REPORTSRC Action Type: 12-20-2013Disch Cleanup Status Date: SRCR - SRCR COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: 03-16-2010Discharge Date: 12-20-2013Source Effective Date: ICleanup Eligibility Status: 11County ID: COLLIERCounty: V - Marine/Coastal Fuel Storage -Facility Type: OPENFacility Status: 8735785Facility ID: SDDistrict: Task Information: -Tank Office: Not reportedSite Mgr End Date: Not reportedSite Manager: I - INELIGIBLEEligibility Indicator: Not reportedOther Source Description: D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATIONInformation Source: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: 01/10/1996Disch Cleanup Status Date: NFA - NFA COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPCT Discharge Combined: 04/15/1992Discharge Date: -Tank Office: Not reportedSite Mgr End Date: Not reportedSite Manager: I - INELIGIBLEEligibility Indicator: Not reportedOther Source Description: D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATIONInformation Source: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: 12/20/2013Disch Cleanup Status Date: SRCR - SRCR COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPCT Discharge Combined: 03/16/2010Discharge Date: Discharge Cleanup Summary: 06/30/1998Address Update: 03/23/2010Name Update: JUSTIN FINCHOperator: Not reportedScore When Ranked: 02/22/2011Score Effective Date: 6Score: 0Datum: AGPSMethod: Not reportedFeature: Not reportedRange: Not reportedTownship: Not reportedSection: 26 15 17.8808 / 81 49 17.6218Lat/Long (dms): South DistrictDistrict: SOUTHBAY MARINA (Continued)U003108508 TC4630846.2s Page 10 275 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1059 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation A - APPROVEDSRC Completion Status: Not reportedSRC Review Date: Not reportedSRC Submit Date: NFA - NO FURTHER ACTIONSRC Action Type: 01-10-1996Disch Cleanup Status Date: NFA - NFA COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: 04-15-1992Discharge Date: 01-10-1996Source Effective Date: ICleanup Eligibility Status: 11County ID: COLLIERCounty: V - Marine/Coastal Fuel Storage -Facility Type: OPENFacility Status: 8735785Facility ID: SDDistrict: Not reportedRA Actual Cost: 0RA Years to Complete: -RA Funding Eligibility Type: -RA Cleanup Responsible: 88120RA Task ID: Not reportedRAP Last Order Approved: Not reportedRAP Payment Date: Not reportedRAP Completion Date: Not reportedRAP Actual Cost: -RAP Funding Eligibility Type: -RAP Cleanup Responsible ID: Not reportedRAP Task ID: Not reportedSA Payment Date: Not reportedSA Completion Date: Not reportedSA Actual Cost: -SA Funding Eligibility Type: -SA Cleanup Responsible: 87205SA Task ID: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Comments: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status Date: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status: Not reportedSR Alternate Proc Received Date: Not reportedSR Other Treatment: Not reportedSR Soil Treatment: Not reportedSR Soil Tonnage Removed: Not reportedSR Free Product Removal: Not reportedSR Soil Removal: Not reportedSR Written Date: Not reportedSR Oral Date: Not reportedSR Payment Date: Not reportedSR Completion Date: Not reportedSR Actual Cost: -SR Funding Eligibility Type: -SR Cleanup Responsible: Not reportedSR Task ID: -Tank Office: Not reportedSite Mgr End Date: Not reportedSite Mgr: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: Not reportedSRC Comment: 12-20-2013SRC Issue Date: SOUTHBAY MARINA (Continued)U003108508 TC4630846.2s Page 11 276 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1060 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 150 S 5TH ST #1360Owner Address: VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGSOwner Name: 70813Owner Id: Owner: 26 21 43 / 81 21 59Lat/Long (dms): AGPSPositioning Method: STATERegion: (239) 597-2063Facility Phone: Marine/Coastal Fuel StorageType Description: OPENFacility Status: 8735785Facility Id: UST: Click here for Florida Oculus: Not reportedRA Actual Cost: 0RA Years to Complete: -RA Funding Eligibility Type: -RA Cleanup Responsible: 62708RA Task ID: Not reportedRAP Last Order Approved: Not reportedRAP Payment Date: Not reportedRAP Completion Date: Not reportedRAP Actual Cost: -RAP Funding Eligibility Type: -RAP Cleanup Responsible ID: Not reportedRAP Task ID: Not reportedSA Payment Date: Not reportedSA Completion Date: Not reportedSA Actual Cost: -SA Funding Eligibility Type: -SA Cleanup Responsible: Not reportedSA Task ID: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Comments: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status Date: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status: Not reportedSR Alternate Proc Received Date: Not reportedSR Other Treatment: Not reportedSR Soil Treatment: Not reportedSR Soil Tonnage Removed: Not reportedSR Free Product Removal: Not reportedSR Soil Removal: Not reportedSR Written Date: Not reportedSR Oral Date: Not reportedSR Payment Date: Not reportedSR Completion Date: Not reportedSR Actual Cost: -SR Funding Eligibility Type: -SR Cleanup Responsible: Not reportedSR Task ID: -Tank Office: Not reportedSite Mgr End Date: Not reportedSite Mgr: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: NFAP WAS GRANTED BY FDEPSRC Comment: 01-10-1996SRC Issue Date: SOUTHBAY MARINA (Continued)U003108508 TC4630846.2s Page 12 277 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1061 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Tank ID: Piping: Monitor dbl wall pipe spaceMonitoring Description: 1Tank ID: Monitor dbl wall tank spaceMonitoring Description: 1Tank ID: Visual inspect pipe sumpsMonitoring Description: 1Tank ID: Mechanical line leak detectorMonitoring Description: 1Tank ID: Visual inspect dispenser linersMonitoring Description: 1Tank ID: Monitoring: DEP approved containmentConstruction Description: Secondary ContainmentConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: Tight fillConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: Flow shut-OffConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: Spill containment bucketConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: Fiberglass clad steelConstruction Description: Primary ConstructionConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: Construction: CDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 2000Gallons: Unleaded GasContent Description: Unleaded gasSubstance: Not reportedInstall Date: Not reportedStatus Date: In serviceStatus: 1Tank Id: Tank Info: (612) 359-8991Owner Phone: BEN ALBANYOwner Contact: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address 2: SOUTHBAY MARINA (Continued)U003108508 TC4630846.2s Page 13 278 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1062 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 01-APR-2010Effective Date: ZURICH-AMERICANInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Marine/Coastal Fuel StorageType Description: VFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 597-2063Facility Phone: 8735785Facility ID: 3Region: (612) 359-8991Resp Party Phone: BEN ALBANYContact: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 150 S 5TH ST #1360Owner Address: VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGSOnwer Name: 70813Owner ID: 09-MAY-2015Expire Date: 09-MAY-2014Effective Date: HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Marine/Coastal Fuel StorageType Description: VFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 597-2063Facility Phone: 8735785Facility ID: 3Region: FL Financial Assurance 3: Click here for Florida Oculus: FiberglassPiping Description: Primary ConstructionPiping Category: 1Tank ID: Piping over waterPiping Description: WPiping Category: 1Tank ID: Approved synthetic materialPiping Description: Primary ConstructionPiping Category: 1Tank ID: Dispenser linersPiping Description: Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 1Tank ID: Pressurized piping systemPiping Description: Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 1Tank ID: Double wallPiping Description: Secondary ContainmentPiping Category: SOUTHBAY MARINA (Continued)U003108508 TC4630846.2s Page 14 279 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1063 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Marine/Coastal Fuel StorageType Description: VFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 597-2063Facility Phone: 8735785Facility ID: 3Region: FL Financial Assurance 3: (612) 359-8991Resp Party Phone: BEN ALBANYContact: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 150 S 5TH ST #1360Owner Address: VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGSOnwer Name: 70813Owner ID: 09-MAY-2014Expire Date: 09-MAY-2013Effective Date: HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Marine/Coastal Fuel StorageType Description: VFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 597-2063Facility Phone: 8735785Facility ID: 3Region: (612) 359-8991Resp Party Phone: BEN ALBANYContact: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 150 S 5TH ST #1360Owner Address: VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGSOnwer Name: 70813Owner ID: 01-APR-2010Expire Date: 01-APR-2009Effective Date: ZURICH-AMERICANInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Marine/Coastal Fuel StorageType Description: VFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 597-2063Facility Phone: 8735785Facility ID: 3Region: (612) 359-8991Resp Party Phone: BEN ALBANYContact: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 150 S 5TH ST #1360Owner Address: VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGSOnwer Name: 70813Owner ID: 01-APR-2011Expire Date: SOUTHBAY MARINA (Continued)U003108508 TC4630846.2s Page 15 280 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1064 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Marine/Coastal Fuel StorageType Description: VFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 597-2063Facility Phone: 8735785Facility ID: 3Region: (612) 359-8991Resp Party Phone: BEN ALBANYContact: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 150 S 5TH ST #1360Owner Address: VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGSOnwer Name: 70813Owner ID: 01-APR-2010Expire Date: 01-APR-2009Effective Date: ZURICH-AMERICANInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Marine/Coastal Fuel StorageType Description: VFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 597-2063Facility Phone: 8735785Facility ID: 3Region: (612) 359-8991Resp Party Phone: BEN ALBANYContact: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 150 S 5TH ST #1360Owner Address: VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGSOnwer Name: 70813Owner ID: 01-APR-2011Expire Date: 01-APR-2010Effective Date: ZURICH-AMERICANInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Marine/Coastal Fuel StorageType Description: VFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 597-2063Facility Phone: 8735785Facility ID: 3Region: (612) 359-8991Resp Party Phone: BEN ALBANYContact: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 150 S 5TH ST #1360Owner Address: VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGSOnwer Name: 70813Owner ID: 09-MAY-2015Expire Date: 09-MAY-2014Effective Date: SOUTHBAY MARINA (Continued)U003108508 TC4630846.2s Page 16 281 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1065 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Marine/Coastal Fuel StorageType Description: VFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 597-2063Facility Phone: 8735785Facility ID: 3Region: (612) 359-8991Resp Party Phone: BEN ALBANYContact: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 150 S 5TH ST #1360Owner Address: VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGSOnwer Name: 70813Owner ID: 01-APR-2011Expire Date: 01-APR-2010Effective Date: ZURICH-AMERICANInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Marine/Coastal Fuel StorageType Description: VFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 597-2063Facility Phone: 8735785Facility ID: 3Region: (612) 359-8991Resp Party Phone: BEN ALBANYContact: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 150 S 5TH ST #1360Owner Address: VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGSOnwer Name: 70813Owner ID: 09-MAY-2015Expire Date: 09-MAY-2014Effective Date: HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Marine/Coastal Fuel StorageType Description: VFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 597-2063Facility Phone: 8735785Facility ID: 3Region: FL Financial Assurance 3: (612) 359-8991Resp Party Phone: BEN ALBANYContact: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 150 S 5TH ST #1360Owner Address: VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGSOnwer Name: 70813Owner ID: 09-MAY-2014Expire Date: 09-MAY-2013Effective Date: SOUTHBAY MARINA (Continued)U003108508 TC4630846.2s Page 17 282 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1066 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (612) 359-8991Resp Party Phone: BEN ALBANYContact: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 150 S 5TH ST #1360Owner Address: VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGSOnwer Name: 70813Owner ID: 09-MAY-2014Expire Date: 09-MAY-2013Effective Date: HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Marine/Coastal Fuel StorageType Description: VFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 597-2063Facility Phone: 8735785Facility ID: 3Region: (612) 359-8991Resp Party Phone: BEN ALBANYContact: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 150 S 5TH ST #1360Owner Address: VANDERBILT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGSOnwer Name: 70813Owner ID: 01-APR-2010Expire Date: 01-APR-2009Effective Date: ZURICH-AMERICANInsurance Company: SOUTHBAY MARINA (Continued)U003108508 Not reportedAddress Update: Not reportedName Update: JEANNE NIXONOperator: 9Score When Ranked: 11/20/2007Score Effective Date: 5Score: 0Datum: UNVRMethod: Not reportedFeature: Not reportedRange: Not reportedTownship: Not reportedSection: 26 15 14.837 / 81 49 23.0416Lat/Long (dms): South DistrictDistrict: 11086Facility Cleanup Rank: (239)597-2755Facility Phone: C - Fuel user/Non-retailFacility Type: CLOSEDFacility Status: 9102755Facility Id: STATERegion: LUST: 55 ft.Financial Assurance 0.010 mi.DWM CONTAM Relative: Higher Actual: 4 ft. < 1/8 CLEANUP SITESNAPLES, FL 33963 WSW UST9051 GULF SHORE DR N N/A 3 LUSTBEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM U003109978 TC4630846.2s Page 18 283 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1067 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 400000Cap Amount: 0Co-Pay Paid To Date: Not reportedCo-Pay Amount: 0Deductible Paid To Date: 10000Deductible Amount: -Tank Office: Not reportedSite Mgr End Date: Not reportedSite Manager: Not reportedInspection Date: NoRedetermined: Not reportedLetter Of Intent Date: 10-DEC-02Elig Status Date: 10-DEC-02Eligibility Status: P - PETROLEUM LIABILITY AND RESTORATION INSURANCE PROGRAMCleanup Program: 10-DEC-02Application Received Date: Not reportedOther Source Description: D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATIONInformation Source: INACTIVECleanup Work Status: 12/16/2002Disch Cleanup Status Date: ENTD - ELIGIBLE - NO TASK LEVEL DATADischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPct Discharge Combined With: 25-JUL-95Discharge Date: 9102755Facility ID: Petroleum Cleanup Program Eligibility: -Tank Office: Not reportedSite Mgr End Date: Not reportedSite Manager: E - ELIGIBLEEligibility Indicator: Not reportedOther Source Description: D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATIONInformation Source: INACTIVECleanup Work Status: 12/16/2002Disch Cleanup Status Date: ENTD - ELIGIBLE - NO TASK LEVEL DATADischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPCT Discharge Combined: 07/25/1995Discharge Date: Discharge Cleanup Summary: Not reportedRP Extension: Not reportedRP Zip: 09/16/1991RP Begin Date: ACCOUNT OWNERPrimary RP Role: 1700Related Party ID: 20-NOV-07Score Effective Date: 5Score: 33963Zip: FLState: NBad Address Ind: (813)597-2755Phone: NAPLES, FL 33963Contact City/State/Zip: 9051 GULF SHORE DR NContact Address: BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOC INCContact Company: BRUCE MATTERSContact: APPL - APPLICATIONFacility Cleanup Status: Petroleum Cleanup PCT Facility Score: BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM (Continued)U003109978 TC4630846.2s Page 19 284 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1068 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedRA Years to Complete: -RA Funding Eligibility Type: -RA Cleanup Responsible: Not reportedRA Task ID: Not reportedRAP Last Order Approved: Not reportedRAP Payment Date: Not reportedRAP Completion Date: Not reportedRAP Actual Cost: -RAP Funding Eligibility Type: -RAP Cleanup Responsible ID: Not reportedRAP Task ID: Not reportedSA Payment Date: Not reportedSA Completion Date: Not reportedSA Actual Cost: -SA Funding Eligibility Type: -SA Cleanup Responsible: Not reportedSA Task ID: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Comments: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status Date: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status: Not reportedSR Alternate Proc Received Date: Not reportedSR Other Treatment: Not reportedSR Soil Treatment: Not reportedSR Soil Tonnage Removed: Not reportedSR Free Product Removal: Not reportedSR Soil Removal: Not reportedSR Written Date: Not reportedSR Oral Date: Not reportedSR Payment Date: Not reportedSR Completion Date: Not reportedSR Actual Cost: -SR Funding Eligibility Type: -SR Cleanup Responsible: Not reportedSR Task ID: -Tank Office: Not reportedSite Mgr End Date: Not reportedSite Mgr: INACTIVECleanup Work Status: Not reportedSRC Comment: Not reportedSRC Issue Date: -SRC Completion Status: Not reportedSRC Review Date: Not reportedSRC Submit Date: -SRC Action Type: 12-16-2002Disch Cleanup Status Date: ENTD - ELIGIBLE - NO TASK LEVEL DATADischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: 07-25-1995Discharge Date: Not reportedSource Effective Date: ECleanup Eligibility Status: 11County ID: COLLIERCounty: C - Fuel user/Non-retail -Facility Type: CLOSEDFacility Status: 9102755Facility ID: SDDistrict: Task Information: BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM (Continued)U003109978 TC4630846.2s Page 20 285 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1069 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONCollect Affiliation: 08/18/2004Collect Date: STANDRIDGE_NCollect Username: REVIEWEDVSC1 Verification Status: High Accuracy Reference NetworkDC4 Datum Id: Digital Aerial Photography With Ground ControlCMC2 Coordinate Method Id: 4Calc Coordinates Accuracy Level Id: CENTRPC2 Proximity Id: FACILOIC Object Of Interest Id: Not reportedPhysical Address Line 2: SDOC3 Office Id: 02/27/2016Data Load Date: PENDINGRSC2 Remediation Status Key: PETROCLLC Cleanup Category Key: TKCPAC Program Area Id: 9102755Source Database Id: Storage Tank Contamination MonitoringSource Database Name: 43027836DEP Cleanup Site Key: CLEANUP SITES: Click here for Florida Oculus: PDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 550Gallons: Emerg Generator DieselContent Description: Diesel-emergen generatorSubstance: 01-JUL-1980Install Date: 01-JUL-1995Status Date: RemovedStatus: 1Tank Id: Tank Info: (813) 597-2755Owner Phone: BRUCE MATTERSOwner Contact: NAPLES, FL 33963Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address 2: 9051 GULF SHORE DR NOwner Address: BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOC INCOwner Name: 1700Owner Id: Owner: 26 15 13 / 81 49 24Lat/Long (dms): UNVRPositioning Method: STATERegion: (239) 597-2755Facility Phone: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CLOSEDFacility Status: 9102755Facility Id: UST: Click here for Florida Oculus: Not reportedRA Actual Cost: BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM (Continued) U003109978 TC4630846.2s Page 21 286 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1070 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3Region: FL Financial Assurance 3: (813) 597-2755Resp Party Phone: BRUCE MATTERSContact: NAPLES, FL 33963Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 9051 GULF SHORE DR NOwner Address: BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOC INCOnwer Name: 1700Owner ID: 25-JAN-1996Expire Date: 25-JAN-1995Effective Date: FPLIPAInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: CLOSEDFacility Status: (239) 597-2755Facility Phone: 9102755Facility ID: 3Region: FL Financial Assurance 3: Not reportedIneligible: YesProgram Eligible: DPHOMethod: HARNDatum: Not reportedDate Known Offsite: WAITINGRemediation Status: 5Priority Score: Not reportedProject Manager: UOffsite Contamination: PetroleumProgram Area: PCLP11Office/ District: 23.0416Long SS: 49Long MM: 81Long DD: 14.837Lat SS: 15Lat MM: 26Lat DD: 9102755Program Site Id: DWM CONTAM: 26 15 14.8370 / 49 23.0416 81Latitude/Longitude (deg/min/sec): Not reportedComments: DPHOVerified Coordinate Method ID Code: HARNDC4 Datum ID Code: DPHOCMC2 Coordinate Method ID Code: STCMSource Database Name Code: Digital Aerial Photography With Ground ControlVerified Coordinate Method Id: 08/18/2004Verification Date: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONVerifier Affiliation: STANDRIDGE_NVerifier Username: 0Interpolation Scale: 2289Map Source Scale: 1999 doqsMap Source: BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM (Continued)U003109978 TC4630846.2s Page 22 287 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1071 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (813) 597-2755Resp Party Phone: BRUCE MATTERSContact: NAPLES, FL 33963Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 9051 GULF SHORE DR NOwner Address: BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOC INCOnwer Name: 1700Owner ID: 25-JAN-1996Expire Date: 25-JAN-1995Effective Date: FPLIPAInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: CLOSEDFacility Status: (239) 597-2755Facility Phone: 9102755Facility ID: 3Region: FL Financial Assurance 3: (813) 597-2755Resp Party Phone: BRUCE MATTERSContact: NAPLES, FL 33963Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 9051 GULF SHORE DR NOwner Address: BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOC INCOnwer Name: 1700Owner ID: 25-JAN-1996Expire Date: 25-JAN-1995Effective Date: FPLIPAInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: CLOSEDFacility Status: (239) 597-2755Facility Phone: 9102755Facility ID: BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM (Continued) U003109978 Not reportedFeature: Not reportedRange: Not reportedTownship: Not reportedSection: 26 15 8.5079 / 81 49 18.7612Lat/Long (dms): South DistrictDistrict: Not reportedFacility Cleanup Rank: (239)598-3300Facility Phone: C - Fuel user/Non-retailFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: 9102673Facility Id: STATERegion: LUST: 58 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster B 0.011 mi.Financial Assurance Relative: Higher Actual: 4 ft. < 1/8 ASTNAPLES, FL 34108 SE UST280 VANDERBILT BCH RD N/A B4 LUSTRITZ CARLTON U001377303 TC4630846.2s Page 23 288 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1072 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NFA - NO FURTHER ACTIONSRC Action Type: 01-14-2003Disch Cleanup Status Date: NFA - NFA COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: 10-31-1994Discharge Date: 12-11-2002Source Effective Date: ICleanup Eligibility Status: 11County ID: COLLIERCounty: C - Fuel user/Non-retail -Facility Type: OPENFacility Status: 9102673Facility ID: SDDistrict: Task Information: Not reportedGallons Discharged: Not reportedPollutant Other Description: B - Unleaded GasPollutant: NoContaminated Ground Water: NoContaminated Surface Water: NoContaminated Soil: YesContaminated Monitoring Well: 0Contaminated Drinking Wells: PCLP11 - COLLIER COUNTY SOLIDTank Office: 01/14/2003Site Mgr End Date: HOGAN_SSite Manager: I - INELIGIBLEElig Indicator: Not reportedOther Source Description: D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATIONInformation Source: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: 01/14/2003Disch Cleanup Status Date: NFA - NFA COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPct Discharge Combined With: 10/31/1994Discharge Date: Contaminated Media: PCLP11 - COLLIER COUNTY SOLID & HAZ WASTE MGMT DEPTTank Office: 01/14/2003Site Mgr End Date: HOGAN_SSite Manager: I - INELIGIBLEEligibility Indicator: Not reportedOther Source Description: D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATIONInformation Source: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: 01/14/2003Disch Cleanup Status Date: NFA - NFA COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPCT Discharge Combined: 10/31/1994Discharge Date: Discharge Cleanup Summary: 08/27/2002Address Update: Not reportedName Update: JEFFERY BROWNOperator: Not reportedScore When Ranked: 07/06/2001Score Effective Date: 10Score: 0Datum: AGPSMethod: RITZ CARLTON (Continued)U001377303 TC4630846.2s Page 24 289 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1073 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Owner: 26 15 9 / 81 49 19Lat/Long (dms): AGPSPositioning Method: STATERegion: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: OPENFacility Status: 9102673Facility Id: UST: Click here for Florida Oculus: Not reportedRA Actual Cost: 0RA Years to Complete: -RA Funding Eligibility Type: RP - RESPONSIBLE PARTYRA Cleanup Responsible: 41319RA Task ID: 1996-01-30 00:00:00RAP Last Order Approved: Not reportedRAP Payment Date: Not reportedRAP Completion Date: Not reportedRAP Actual Cost: -RAP Funding Eligibility Type: -RAP Cleanup Responsible ID: 41318RAP Task ID: Not reportedSA Payment Date: 01-30-1996SA Completion Date: Not reportedSA Actual Cost: -SA Funding Eligibility Type: -SA Cleanup Responsible: 41317SA Task ID: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Comments: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status Date: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status: Not reportedSR Alternate Proc Received Date: Not reportedSR Other Treatment: Not reportedSR Soil Treatment: Not reportedSR Soil Tonnage Removed: Not reportedSR Free Product Removal: Not reportedSR Soil Removal: Not reportedSR Written Date: Not reportedSR Oral Date: Not reportedSR Payment Date: Not reportedSR Completion Date: Not reportedSR Actual Cost: -SR Funding Eligibility Type: -SR Cleanup Responsible: Not reportedSR Task ID: PCLP11 - Collier CountyTank Office: 01-14-2003Site Mgr End Date: HOGAN_SSite Mgr: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: Not reportedSRC Comment: 01-14-2003SRC Issue Date: A - APPROVEDSRC Completion Status: 12-11-2002SRC Review Date: 11-18-2002SRC Submit Date: RITZ CARLTON (Continued)U001377303 TC4630846.2s Page 25 290 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1074 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 01-OCT-2001Status Date: In serviceStatus: 3Tank Id: (813) 598-3300Owner Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONOwner Contact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address 2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOwner Name: 18329Owner Id: Owner: 26 15 9 / 81 49 19Lat/Long (dms): AGPSPositioning Method: STATERegion: PDEP Contractor Own: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: OPENFacility Status: 9102673Facility ID: AST: Click here for Florida Oculus: PDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 550Gallons: Unleaded GasContent Description: Unleaded gasSubstance: 01-JUL-1985Install Date: 01-JAN-1995Status Date: RemovedStatus: 2Tank Id: PDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 2000Gallons: Emerg Generator DieselContent Description: Diesel-emergen generatorSubstance: 01-JUL-1985Install Date: 12-OCT-2001Status Date: RemovedStatus: 1Tank Id: Tank Info: (813) 598-3300Owner Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONOwner Contact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address 2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOwner Name: 18329Owner Id: RITZ CARLTON (Continued)U001377303 TC4630846.2s Page 26 291 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1075 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: FL Financial Assurance 3: Click here for Florida Oculus: Abv, no soil contactPiping Description: Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 3Tank ID: Steel/galvanized metalPiping Description: Primary ConstructionPiping Category: 3Tank ID: Suction piping systemPiping Description: Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 3Tank ID: Piping: Visual inspection of ASTsMonitoring Description: 3Tank ID: Monitor dbl wall tank spaceMonitoring Description: 3Tank ID: Monitoring: Spill containment bucketConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 3Tank Id: Double wallConstruction Description: Secondary ContainmentConstruction Category: 3Tank Id: Level gauges/alarmsConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 3Tank Id: SteelConstruction Description: Primary ConstructionConstruction Category: 3Tank Id: Construction: ABOVEGROUNDTank Location: 2000Gallons: Emerg Generator DieselContent Description: Diesel-emergen generatorSubstance: 01-OCT-2001Install Date: RITZ CARLTON (Continued)U001377303 TC4630846.2s Page 27 292 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1076 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 01-OCT-2012Expire Date: 01-OCT-2011Effective Date: ACEInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 01-OCT-2011Expire Date: 01-OCT-2010Effective Date: ACEInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 01-OCT-2009Expire Date: 01-OCT-2008Effective Date: ACEInsurance Company: RITZ CARLTON (Continued)U001377303 TC4630846.2s Page 28 293 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1077 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: FL Financial Assurance 3: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 15-AUG-2014Expire Date: 15-AUG-2013Effective Date: NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 01-OCT-2010Expire Date: 01-OCT-2009Effective Date: ACEInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 15-AUG-2015Expire Date: 15-AUG-2014Effective Date: NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANYInsurance Company: RITZ CARLTON (Continued)U001377303 TC4630846.2s Page 29 294 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1078 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 01-OCT-2012Expire Date: 01-OCT-2011Effective Date: ACEInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 01-OCT-2011Expire Date: 01-OCT-2010Effective Date: ACEInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 01-OCT-2009Expire Date: 01-OCT-2008Effective Date: ACEInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: RITZ CARLTON (Continued)U001377303 TC4630846.2s Page 30 295 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1079 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: FL Financial Assurance 3: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 15-AUG-2014Expire Date: 15-AUG-2013Effective Date: NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 01-OCT-2010Expire Date: 01-OCT-2009Effective Date: ACEInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 15-AUG-2015Expire Date: 15-AUG-2014Effective Date: NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: RITZ CARLTON (Continued)U001377303 TC4630846.2s Page 31 296 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1080 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 01-OCT-2012Expire Date: 01-OCT-2011Effective Date: ACEInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 01-OCT-2011Expire Date: 01-OCT-2010Effective Date: ACEInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 01-OCT-2009Expire Date: 01-OCT-2008Effective Date: ACEInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: RITZ CARLTON (Continued)U001377303 TC4630846.2s Page 32 297 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1081 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 15-AUG-2014Expire Date: 15-AUG-2013Effective Date: NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 01-OCT-2010Expire Date: 01-OCT-2009Effective Date: ACEInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (239) 598-3300Facility Phone: 9102673Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 598-3300Resp Party Phone: JEFFERY A JACKSONContact: NORTH NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address2: 280 VANDERBILT RDOwner Address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COOnwer Name: 18329Owner ID: 15-AUG-2015Expire Date: 15-AUG-2014Effective Date: NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: RITZ CARLTON (Continued)U001377303 TC4630846.2s Page 33 298 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1082 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: 08/04/2001Owner/Op end date: 08/03/2001Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: NAPLES, FL 34108 280 VANDERBILT BEACH RDOwner/operator address: LYLE ALVERSONOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 08/03/2001Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: BETHESDA, MD 20817 10400 FERNWOOD RDOwner/operator address: HOST MARRIOTT CORPOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 04EPA Region: ROMMY.SMITH@RITZCARLTON.COMContact email: (239) 598-3300Contact telephone: USContact country: NAPLES, FL 34108 VANDERBILT BEACH ROADContact address: ROMMY SMITHContact: NAPLES, FL 34108-2371 VANDERBILT BEACH RDMailing address: FLD982105637EPA ID: NAPLES, FL 341082300 280 VANDERBILT BEACH RDFacility address: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL INCFacility name: 08/26/2009Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 58 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster B 0.011 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 4 ft. < 1/8 NAPLES, FL 34108 SE US AIRS280 VANDERBILT BEACH RD FLD982105637 B5 RCRA-SQGRITZ CARLTON HOTEL INC 1000442742 TC4630846.2s Page 34 299 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1083 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 05/30/2001 Enforcement action date: DEP NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 06/18/2001Date achieved compliance: 05/15/2001Date violation determined: Generators - Pre-transportArea of violation: GSQ:40 CFR 262.34(d)&(a)Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 05/30/2001 Enforcement action date: DEP NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 06/18/2001Date achieved compliance: 05/15/2001Date violation determined: Generators - Pre-transportArea of violation: GSQ:40 CFR 262.34(d)(4)Regulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL INCSite name: 11/06/2001Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F004, AND USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND 1,1,2, CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,. Waste name: F002. Waste code: TRICHLORETHYLENE. Waste name: D040. Waste code: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE. Waste name: D039. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL INC (Continued) 1000442742 TC4630846.2s Page 35 300 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1084 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/24/1987 Enforcement action date: DEP WARNING LETTER Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/01/1987Date achieved compliance: 09/24/1987Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: GGR:Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 05/30/2001 Enforcement action date: DEP NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 06/18/2001Date achieved compliance: 05/15/2001Date violation determined: Generators - Records/ReportingArea of violation: GRR:40 CFR 262.40Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 05/30/2001 Enforcement action date: DEP NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/07/2001Date achieved compliance: 05/15/2001Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: GGR:40 CFR 262.11Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 05/30/2001 Enforcement action date: DEP NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 06/18/2001Date achieved compliance: 05/15/2001Date violation determined: State Statute or RegulationArea of violation: GOR:376.3078(7)(a)&(b)Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL INC (Continued)1000442742 TC4630846.2s Page 36 301 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1085 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation StateEvaluation lead agency: 08/07/2001Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/15/2001Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 06/18/2001Date achieved compliance: Generators - Records/ReportingArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/15/2001Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 06/18/2001Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 08/07/2001Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE VISITEvaluation: 05/13/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/25/2009Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 02/20/1987Date achieved compliance: 02/16/1987Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: GGR:Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL INC (Continued) 1000442742 TC4630846.2s Page 37 302 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1086 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedActivity Status Date: 2003-08-06 00:00:00Activity Date: Title V PermitsAir Program: MINDefault Air Classification Code: OPRAir Operating Status Code: 110001740769Facility Registry ID: AIR FL0000001202100082Programmatic ID: 04Region Code: US AIRS MINOR: Not reportedHPV Status: Not reportedAir CMS Category Code: POFFacility Type of Ownership Code: MINDefault Air Classification Code: 812320NAICS Code: 7216Primary SIC Code: Not reportedD and B Number: 110001740769Facility Registry ID: AIR FL0000001202100082Programmatic ID: 04Region Code: 1000442742Envid: US AIRS MINOR: StateEvaluation lead agency: 02/20/1987Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 02/16/1987Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 10/01/1987Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 02/16/1987Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 07/06/1987Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 09/24/1987Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 06/18/2001Date achieved compliance: Generators - Pre-transportArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/15/2001Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 06/18/2001Date achieved compliance: State Statute or RegulationArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/15/2001Evaluation date: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL INC (Continued) 1000442742 TC4630846.2s Page 38 303 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1087 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation MINDefault Air Classification Code: OPRAir Operating Status Code: 110001740769Facility Registry ID: AIR FL0000001202100082Programmatic ID: 04Region Code: Not reportedActivity Status: Inspection/EvaluationActivity Type: Compliance MonitoringActivity Group: Not reportedActivity Status Date: 2007-03-08 00:00:00Activity Date: Title V PermitsAir Program: MINDefault Air Classification Code: OPRAir Operating Status Code: 110001740769Facility Registry ID: AIR FL0000001202100082Programmatic ID: 04Region Code: Not reportedActivity Status: Inspection/EvaluationActivity Type: Compliance MonitoringActivity Group: Not reportedActivity Status Date: 2005-10-31 00:00:00Activity Date: Title V PermitsAir Program: MINDefault Air Classification Code: OPRAir Operating Status Code: 110001740769Facility Registry ID: AIR FL0000001202100082Programmatic ID: 04Region Code: Not reportedActivity Status: Inspection/EvaluationActivity Type: Compliance MonitoringActivity Group: Not reportedActivity Status Date: 2004-07-16 00:00:00Activity Date: Title V PermitsAir Program: MINDefault Air Classification Code: OPRAir Operating Status Code: 110001740769Facility Registry ID: AIR FL0000001202100082Programmatic ID: 04Region Code: Not reportedActivity Status: Inspection/EvaluationActivity Type: Compliance MonitoringActivity Group: Not reportedActivity Status Date: 2003-09-23 00:00:00Activity Date: Title V PermitsAir Program: MINDefault Air Classification Code: OPRAir Operating Status Code: 110001740769Facility Registry ID: AIR FL0000001202100082Programmatic ID: 04Region Code: Not reportedActivity Status: Inspection/EvaluationActivity Type: Compliance MonitoringActivity Group: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL INC (Continued)1000442742 TC4630846.2s Page 39 304 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1088 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedActivity Status: Inspection/EvaluationActivity Type: Compliance MonitoringActivity Group: Not reportedActivity Status Date: 2009-05-13 00:00:00Activity Date: Title V PermitsAir Program: MINDefault Air Classification Code: OPRAir Operating Status Code: 110001740769Facility Registry ID: AIR FL0000001202100082Programmatic ID: 04Region Code: Not reportedActivity Status: Inspection/EvaluationActivity Type: Compliance MonitoringActivity Group: Not reportedActivity Status Date: 2009-05-12 00:00:00Activity Date: Title V PermitsAir Program: MINDefault Air Classification Code: OPRAir Operating Status Code: 110001740769Facility Registry ID: AIR FL0000001202100082Programmatic ID: 04Region Code: Not reportedActivity Status: Inspection/EvaluationActivity Type: Compliance MonitoringActivity Group: Not reportedActivity Status Date: 2008-03-27 00:00:00Activity Date: Title V PermitsAir Program: MINDefault Air Classification Code: OPRAir Operating Status Code: 110001740769Facility Registry ID: AIR FL0000001202100082Programmatic ID: 04Region Code: Not reportedActivity Status: Inspection/EvaluationActivity Type: Compliance MonitoringActivity Group: Not reportedActivity Status Date: 2008-03-21 00:00:00Activity Date: Title V PermitsAir Program: RITZ CARLTON HOTEL INC (Continued) 1000442742 10/27/1998Initial Date Received: Not reportedOGC Case Number: MASELLA_CProject Manager: CLOSEDSite Status: 209265Project Id: 150838Site Id: South DistrictDistrict: RESP PARTY: 58 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster B 0.011 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 4 ft. < 1/8 NAPLES, FL 33963 SE 280 VANDERBUILT BEACH ROAD N/A B6 RESP PARTYTHE RITZ-CARLTON OF NAPLES S117361281 TC4630846.2s Page 40 305 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1089 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 26 15 8.73320000 / 81 49 18.648Latitude/Longitude (deg/min/sec): Digital Aerial Photography With Ground ControlDecode for V_Method: extend offsite. that contamination above applicable standards or criteria DOES NOT No, the best available evidence (such as completed SAR) demonstratesDecode for Off Site COC: UnverifiedDecode for Method: High Accuracy Reference NetworkDecode for Datum: South DistrictDecode for District: 11/08/2004Verification Date: CLVerifying Program Id: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONVerifier Affiliation: STANDRIDGE_NVerifier Username: DPHOVerify Method Id: 4Coordinate Accuracy Id: 0Interpolation Scale: 1527Map Source Scale: 1999 doqsMap Series Used: 11/08/2004Collect Date: CLCollect Program Id: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONCollect Affiliation: STANDRIDGE_NCollect Username: CENTRProximity To Object: CAP_RAP SITEObject Of Interest: Beach sand, along shoreFeature: UNVRMethod ID: HARNDatum: Not reportedPriority Score: NOffsite Cont Impact: drycleaning solventsContaminants: THE RITZ-CARLTON OF NAPLES (Continued) S117361281 Enclosed/modifiedStatus: 1Tank Id: (941) 591-2202Owner Phone: FRANK KITCHENER JROwner Contact: NAPLES, FL 34108Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address 2: 8700 BAY COLONY DROwner Address: BAY COLONY COMMUNITY ASSOCOwner Name: 47771Owner Id: Owner: 26 15 6 / 81 49 8Lat/Long (dms): AGPSPositioning Method: STATERegion: PDEP Contractor Own: (941) 641-3222Facility Phone: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: CLOSEDFacility Status: 9601600Facility ID: AST: 922 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster C 0.175 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 4 ft. 1/8-1/4 NAPLES, FL 34108 SSE 8707 BAY COLONY DR N/A C7 ASTBAY COLONY LANDSCAPE OPER A100130508 TC4630846.2s Page 41 306 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1090 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Florida Oculus: ABOVEGROUNDTank Location: 548Gallons: Leaded GasContent Description: Leaded gasSubstance: 01-JAN-1992Install Date: 26-MAR-2002Status Date: BAY COLONY LANDSCAPE OPER (Continued) A100130508 12/30/1999Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: NAPLES, FL 34108 8700 BAY COLONY DROwner/operator address: BAY COLONY COMMUNITY ASSOCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendarDescription: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 04EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (941) 591-2202Contact telephone: USContact country: NAPLES, FL 34108-7711 BAY COLONY DRContact address: KAREN TODDContact: NAPLES, FL 34108-7711 BAY COLONY DRMailing address: FLR000061937EPA ID: NAPLES, FL 341087757 8700 BAY COLONY DRFacility address: BAY COLONY COMMUNITY ASSOCFacility name: 12/27/1999Date form received by agency: RCRA-CESQG: 990 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster C 0.188 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 4 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHONAPLES, FL 34108 SSE FINDS8700 BAY COLONY DR FLR000061937 C8 RCRA-CESQGBAY COLONY COMMUNITY ASSOC 1001960206 TC4630846.2s Page 42 307 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1091 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/24/2000 Enforcement action date: DEP MEETING Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: 12/22/1999Date violation determined: Listing - GeneralArea of violation: GSC:40 CFR 261.5(f)(3)Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/05/2000 Enforcement action date: DEP WARNING LETTER Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: 12/22/1999Date violation determined: Listing - GeneralArea of violation: GSC:40 CFR 261.5(f)(3)Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/05/2000 Enforcement action date: DEP WARNING LETTER Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: 12/22/1999Date violation determined: Used Oil - GeneratorsArea of violation: UOS:40 CFR 279.22(c)(1)‘Regulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: BAY COLONY COMMUNITY ASSOC (Continued)1001960206 TC4630846.2s Page 43 308 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1092 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/05/2000 Enforcement action date: DEP WARNING LETTER Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: 12/22/1999Date violation determined: State Statute or RegulationArea of violation: GOR:FAC 62-737.300(1)Regulation violated: 1090 Paid penalty amount: 1090 Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 03/20/2000 Enforcement action date: DEP SHORT FORM CONSENT ORDER Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: 12/22/1999Date violation determined: Used Oil - GeneratorsArea of violation: UOS:40 CFR 279.22(c)(1)‘Regulation violated: 1090 Paid penalty amount: 1090 Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 03/20/2000 Enforcement action date: DEP SHORT FORM CONSENT ORDER Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: 12/22/1999Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: GGR:40 CFR 262.11Regulation violated: 1090 Paid penalty amount: 1090 Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 03/20/2000 Enforcement action date: DEP SHORT FORM CONSENT ORDER Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: 12/22/1999Date violation determined: State Statute or RegulationArea of violation: GOR:FAC 62-737.300(1)Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: BAY COLONY COMMUNITY ASSOC (Continued)1001960206 TC4630846.2s Page 44 309 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1093 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/05/2000 Enforcement action date: DEP WARNING LETTER Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: 12/22/1999Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: GGR:40 CFR 262.11Regulation violated: 1090 Paid penalty amount: 1090 Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 03/20/2000 Enforcement action date: DEP SHORT FORM CONSENT ORDER Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: 12/22/1999Date violation determined: Listing - GeneralArea of violation: GSC:40 CFR 261.5(f)(3)Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/24/2000 Enforcement action date: DEP MEETING Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: 12/22/1999Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: GGR:40 CFR 262.11Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/24/2000 Enforcement action date: DEP MEETING Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: 12/22/1999Date violation determined: State Statute or RegulationArea of violation: GOR:FAC 62-737.300(1)Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: BAY COLONY COMMUNITY ASSOC (Continued)1001960206 TC4630846.2s Page 45 310 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1094 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110005659910Registry ID: FINDS: StateEvaluation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: Used Oil - GeneratorsArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 12/22/1999Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 12/22/1999Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: State Statute or RegulationArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 12/22/1999Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: Listing - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 12/22/1999Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 03/01/2000Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/24/2000 Enforcement action date: DEP MEETING Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/20/2000Date achieved compliance: 12/22/1999Date violation determined: Used Oil - GeneratorsArea of violation: UOS:40 CFR 279.22(c)(1)‘Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: BAY COLONY COMMUNITY ASSOC (Continued) 1001960206 TC4630846.2s Page 46 311 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1095 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110005659910DFR URL: 110005659910Registry ID: 1001960206Envid: ECHO: affiliation data for the State of Florida. Maintenance (FDM) system maintains entity, environmental interest and Florida Environmental System Today Application (FIESTA) Data corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA BAY COLONY COMMUNITY ASSOC (Continued) 1001960206 TC4630846.2s Page 47 312 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1096 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 0 records.NO SITES FOUNDTC4630846.2s Page 48313 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1097Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4630846.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 314 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1098 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 11/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2016 Number of Days to Update: 135 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC4630846.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 315 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1099 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4630846.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 316 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1100 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4630846.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 317 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1101 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 03/28/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2016 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS: Florida’s State-Funded Action Sites State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-488-0190 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF: Solid Waste Facility Database Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 01/19/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-922-7121 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tank Listing The file for Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks. Please remember STCM does not track the source of the discharge so the agency provides a list of facilities with an aboveground tank and an open discharge split by facilities with aboveground tanks only and facilities with aboveground and underground tanks. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8799 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST: Petroleum Contamination Detail Report Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. Date of Government Version: 01/08/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8839 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4630846.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 318 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1102 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 01/08/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 10/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 118 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 08/20/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 111 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 04/26/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 10/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 11/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4630846.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 319 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1103 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 01/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies FF TANKS: Federal Facilities Listing A listing of federal facilities with storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8250 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST: Storage Tank Facility Information Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 01/08/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8839 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly AST: Storage Tank Facility Information Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/08/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8839 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 09/23/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4630846.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 320 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1104 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 08/20/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 111 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 11/05/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/20/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 11/24/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 04/26/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 01/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 12/14/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4630846.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 321 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1105 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 118 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TANKS: Storage Tank Facility List This listing includes storage tank facilities that do not have tank information. The tanks have either be closed or removed from the site, but the facilities were still registered at some point in history. Date of Government Version: 01/08/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8841 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Registry The registry is a database of all contaminated sites in the state of Florida which are subject to engineering controls. Engineering Controls encompass a variety of engineered remedies to contain and/or reduce contamination, and/or physical barriers intended to limit access to property. ECs include fences, signs, guards, landfill caps, provision of potable water, slurry walls, sheet pile (vertical caps), pumping and treatment of groundwater, monitoring wells, and vapor extraction systems. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8927 Last EDR Contact: 04/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Inst Control: Institutional Controls Registry The registry is a database of all contaminated sites in the state of Florida which are subject to institutional and engineering controls. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8927 Last EDR Contact: 01/06/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. TC4630846.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 322 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1106 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 04/01/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Sites Listing of closed and active voluntary cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8705 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS AREAS: Brownfields Areas Database A "brownfield area" means a contiguous area of one or more brownfield sites, some of which may not be contaminated, that has been designated as such by a local government resolution. Such areas may include all or portions of community redevelopment areas, enterprise zones, empowerment zones, other such designated economically deprived communities and areas, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated brownfield pilot projects. This layer provides a polygon representation of the boundaries of these designated Brownfield Areas in Florida. Date of Government Version: 01/03/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8934 Last EDR Contact: 04/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly BSRA: Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreements Listing The BSRA provides DEP and the public assurance that site rehabilitation will be conducted in accordance with Florida Statutes and DEP’s Contaminated Site Cleanup Criteria rule. In addition, the BSRA provides limited liability protection for the voluntary responsible party. The BSRA contains various commitments by the voluntary responsible party, including milestones for completion of site rehabilitation tasks and submittal of technical reports and plans. It also contains a commitment by DEP to review technical reports according to an agreed upon schedule. Only those brownfield sites with an executed BSRA are eligible to apply for a voluntary cleanup tax credit incentive pursuant to Section 376.30781, Florida Statutes. Date of Government Version: 12/18/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8934 Last EDR Contact: 04/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Sites Database Brownfields are defined by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) as abandoned, idled, or underused industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. Date of Government Version: 01/03/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8927 Last EDR Contact: 04/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists TC4630846.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 323 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1107 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 12/22/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/23/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites SWRCY: Recycling Centers A listing of recycling centers located in the state of Florida. Date of Government Version: 07/24/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2015 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8718 Last EDR Contact: 04/22/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. TC4630846.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 324 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1108 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Date of Government Version: 09/17/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 03/01/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRIORITYCLEANERS: Priority Ranking List The Florida Legislature has established a state-funded program to cleanup properties that are contaminated as a result of the operations of a drycleaning facility. Date of Government Version: 12/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8927 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies FL SITES: Sites List This summary status report was developed from a number of lists including the Eckhardt list, the Moffit list, the EPA Hazardous Waste Sites list, EPA’s Emergency & Remedial Response information System list (RCRA Section 3012) & existing department lists such as the obsolete uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites list. This list is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/1994 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8705 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 09/17/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 03/01/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Land Records LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 02/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 04/26/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. TC4630846.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 325 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1109 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Date of Government Version: 06/24/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 68 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually SPILLS: Oil and Hazardous Materials Incidents Statewide oil and hazardous materials inland incidents. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-2010 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 12/10/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/04/2013 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 03/11/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4630846.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 326 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1110 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4630846.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 327 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1111 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2016 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 133 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans TC4630846.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 328 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1112 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 01/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4630846.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 329 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1113 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/11/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 04/26/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. TC4630846.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 330 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1114 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Date of Government Version: 07/07/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/16/2015 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2015 Number of Days to Update: 218 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2016 Data Release Frequency: Biennially TC4630846.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 331 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1115 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 11/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/26/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 04/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. TC4630846.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 332 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1116 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Date of Government Version: 10/20/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/20/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 02/09/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 07/20/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: EPA Telephone: (404) 562-9900 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4630846.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 333 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1117 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 10/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 571-373-0407 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies AIRS: Permitted Facilities Listing A listing of Air Resources Management permits. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/04/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-921-9558 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies CLEANUP SITES: DEP Cleanup Sites - Contamination Locator Map Listing This listing includes the locations of waste cleanup sites from various programs. The source of the cleanup site data includes Hazardous Waste programs, Site Investigation Section, Compliance and Enforcement Tracking, Drycleaning State Funded Cleanup Program (possibly other state funded cleanup), Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring. Date of Government Version: 02/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 866-282-0787 Last EDR Contact: 03/01/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DEDB: Ethylene Dibromide Database Results Ethylene dibromide (EDB), a soil fumigant, that has been detected in drinking water wells. The amount found exceeds the maximum contaminant level as stated in Chapter 62-550 or 520. It is a potential threat to public health when present in drinking water. Date of Government Version: 01/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 59 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8335 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Facilities The Drycleaners database, maintained by the Department of Environmental Protection, provides information about permitted dry cleaner facilities. Date of Government Version: 01/08/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8927 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC4630846.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 334 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1118 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) DWM CONTAM: DWM CONTAMINATED SITES A listing of active or known sites. The listing includes sites that need cleanup but are not actively being working on because the agency currently does not have funding (primarily petroleum and drycleaning). Date of Government Version: 09/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-7503 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing A list of hazardous waste facilities required to provide financial assurance under RCRA. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/04/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8793 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Date of Government Version: 01/27/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8743 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for storage tanks sites. Date of Government Version: 01/08/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8853 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FL Cattle Dip. Vats: Cattle Dipping Vats From the 1910’s through the 1950’s, these vats were filled with an arsenic solution for the control and eradication of the cattle fever tick. Other pesticides, such as DDT, were also widely used. By State law, all cattle, horses, mules, goats, and other susceptible animals were required to be dipped every 14 days. Under certain circumstances, the arsenic and other pesticides remaining at the site may present an environmental or public health hazard. Date of Government Version: 02/04/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/29/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-4444 Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RESP PARTY: Responsible Party Sites Listing Open, inactive and closed responsible party sites Date of Government Version: 01/03/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/07/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8758 Last EDR Contact: 04/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SITE INV SITES: Site Investigation Section Sites Listing Statewide coverage of Site Investigation Section (SIS) sites. Site Investigation is a Section within the Bureau of Waste Cleanup, Division of Waste Management. SIS provides technical support to FDEP District Waste Cleanup Programs and conducts contamination assessments throughout the state. TC4630846.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 335 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1119 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Date of Government Version: 02/22/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8953 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TIER 2: Tier 2 Facility Listing A listing of facilities which store or manufacture hazardous materials that submit a chemical inventory report. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-413-9970 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies UIC: Underground Injection Wells Database Listing A listing of Class I wells. Class I wells are used to inject hazardous waste, nonhazardous waste, or municipal waste below the lowermost USDW. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8655 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER: Wastewater Facility Regulation Database Domestic and industrial wastewater facilities. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/10/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8600 Last EDR Contact: 05/11/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 09/20/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 103 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2016 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. TC4630846.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 336 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1120 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environmental Protection in Floridia. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environmental Protection in Floridia. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2014 Number of Days to Update: 193 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4630846.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 337 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1121 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environmental Protection in Floridia. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALACHUA COUNTY: Facility List List of all regulated facilities in Alachua County. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: Alachua County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 352-264-6800 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually BROWARD COUNTY: Aboveground Storage Tanks Aboveground storage tank locations in Broward County. Date of Government Version: 12/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Broward County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 954-818-7509 Last EDR Contact: 02/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Semi-Annual Inventory Report on Contaminated Locations Early Detection Incentive/Environmental Assessment Remediation. This report monitors the status and remediation progress of known contaminated locations within Broward County. Sites listed by the US EPA, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and sites licensed for contamination assessment and cleanup by the Division of Pollution Prevention and Remediation Programs of the Department. Date of Government Version: 02/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Broward County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 954-818-7509 Last EDR Contact: 03/01/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Hazardous Material Sites HM sites use or store greater than 25 gallons of hazardous materials per month. Date of Government Version: 12/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Broward County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 954-818-7509 Last EDR Contact: 02/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually Notice Of Violations Sites NOV facilities have received a notice of violation letter under the Broward County Chapter 27 Code. TC4630846.2s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 338 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1122 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Date of Government Version: 12/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Broward County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 954-818-7509 Last EDR Contact: 02/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually Underground Storage Tanks All known regulated storage tanks within Broward County, including those tanks that have been closed Date of Government Version: 12/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Broward County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 954-818-7509 Last EDR Contact: 02/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY: Hillsborough County LF Hillsborough county landfill sites. Date of Government Version: 10/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Hillsborough County Environmental Protection Commission Telephone: 813-627-2600 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies MIAMI-DADE COUNTY: Air Permit Sites Facilities that release or have a potential to release pollutants. Date of Government Version: 02/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6755 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Liquid Waste Transporter List The Liquid Waste Transporter permit regulates the transportation of various types of liquid and solid waste, including hazardous waste, waste oil and oily waste waters, septic and grease trap waste, biomedical waste, spent radiator fluid, photo chemical waste, dry sewage sludge, and other types of non-hazardous industrial waste. The Liquid Waste Transporter permits needed to protect the environment and the public from improperly handled and transported waste. Date of Government Version: 02/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: DERM Telephone: 305-372-6755 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Grease Trap Sites Any non-residential facility that discharges waste to a sanitary sewer. Date of Government Version: 02/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Dade County Dept. of Env. Resources Mgmt. Telephone: 305-372-6508 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC4630846.2s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 339 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1123 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Marine Facilities Operating Permit What is this permit used for? Miami-Dade County Ordinance 89-104 and Section 24-18 of the Code of Miami-Dade County require the following types of marine facilities to obtain annual operating permits from DERM: All recreational boat docking facilities with ten (10) or more boat slips, moorings, davit spaces, and vessel tie-up spaces. All boat storage facilities contiguous to tidal waters in Miami-Dade County with ten (10) or more dry storage spaces including boatyards and boat manufacturing facilities. Date of Government Version: 02/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: DERM Telephone: 305-372-3576 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Maimi River Enforcement The Miami River Enforcement database files were created for facilities and in some instances vessels that were inspected by a workgroup within the Department that was identified as the Miami River Enforcement Group. The files do not all necessarily reflect enforcement cases and some were created for locations that were permitted by other Sections within the Department. Date of Government Version: 06/05/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: DERM Telephone: 305-372-3576 Last EDR Contact: 02/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Hazardous Waste Sites Sites with the potential to generate waste Date of Government Version: 02/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6755 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Industrial Waste Type 2-4 Sites IW2s are facilities having reclaim or recycling systems with no discharges, aboveground holding tanks or spill prevention and countermeasure plans. IW4s are facilities that discharge an effluent to the ground. Date of Government Version: 02/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6700 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Industrial Waste Type 5 Sites Generally these facilities fall under the category of "conditionally exempt small quantity generator" or "small quantity generator". Date of Government Version: 02/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6700 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Industrial Waste Type 6 Permits issued to those non-residential land uses located within the major drinking water wellfield protection areas that are not served by sanitary sewers. These facilities do not handle hazardous materials but are regulated because of the env. sensitivity of the areas where they are located. TC4630846.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 340 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1124 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Date of Government Version: 02/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6700 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Industrial Waste Permit Sites Facilities that either generate more than 25,000 of wastewater per day to sanitary sewers or are pre-defined by EPA. Date of Government Version: 02/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6700 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Enforcement Case Tracking System Sites Enforcement cases monitored by the Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management. Date of Government Version: 02/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6755 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Fuel Spills Cases DERM documents fuel spills of sites that are not in a state program. Date of Government Version: 01/08/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/13/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/05/2009 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6755 Last EDR Contact: 02/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Storage Tanks A listing of aboveground and underground storage tank site locations. Date of Government Version: 02/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Department of Environmental Resource Management Telephone: 305-372-6700 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PALM BEACH COUNTY: Palm Beach County LF Palm Beach County Inventory of Solid Waste Sites. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/20/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/10/2011 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority Telephone: 561-640-4000 Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4630846.2s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 341 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1125 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 05/13/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2016 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2015 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2015 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4630846.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 342 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1126 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Department of Children & Families Source: Provider Information Telephone: 850-488-4900 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8238 TC4630846.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 343 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1127 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4630846.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 344 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1128 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2012Version Date: 5652638 NAPLES NORTH, FLSouth Map: 2012Version Date: 5652584 BONITA SPRINGS, FLTarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 2 ft. above sea levelElevation: 2903955.0UTM Y (Meters): 417937.5UTM X (Meters): Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator: 81.821734 - 81˚ 49’ 18.24’’Longitude (West): 26.254409 - 26˚ 15’ 15.87’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES NAPLES, FL 34108 155 VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD VANDERBILT PROPERTY TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® 345 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1129 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 2 ft. North South West East000044444200002301000000000020058499910General NWGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 346 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1130 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-3 Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not found Status: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapBONITA SPRINGS NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property 1200670381E - FEMA Q3 Flood data 1200670193D - FEMA Q3 Flood dataAdditional Panels in search area: 1200670189E - FEMA Q3 Flood dataFlood Plain Panel at Target Property: YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapCOLLIER, FL FEMA FLOOD ZONE FEMA Flood Electronic DataTarget Property County and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 347 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1131 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-4 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: QuaternarySystem: PleistoceneSeries: QpCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 348 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1132 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 2 1 1 4 5 1 3 3 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles 349 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1133 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-6 No Layer Information available. > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Soil Drainage Class: Not reportedHydrologic Group: variableSoil Surface Texture: WaterSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reportedvariable 5 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 74 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Soil Drainage Class: Not reportedHydrologic Group: variableSoil Surface Texture: Urban landSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 350 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1134 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-7 Somewhat poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class: movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group: fine sandSoil Surface Texture: CanaveralSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 4 Max: Min: Min: 42.34 Max: 141.14 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand79 inches40 inches 2 Max: Min: Min: 42.34 Max: 141.14 soils, Peat. Highly organicNot reportedmuck40 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 8 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: All hydric Very poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: muckSoil Surface Texture: WulfertSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 3 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 351 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1135 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-8 No Layer Information available. > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Soil Drainage Class: movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group: fine sandSoil Surface Texture: Waters of the Gulf of MexicoSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 5 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 141.14 Min: Max: 141.14 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand79 inches 3 inches 2 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 141.14 Min: Max: 141.14 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand 3 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 61 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 352 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1136 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-9 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000053941 I21 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000053940 I20 1/2 - 1 Mile SEFLSO80000001934 H19 1/2 - 1 Mile SEFLSO80000001933 H18 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEFLSO80000039566 G17 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEFLSO80000039567 G15 1/2 - 1 Mile EastFLSO80000035839 G14 1/2 - 1 Mile ENEFLSO80000038508 F13 1/2 - 1 Mile ENEFLSO80000038507 F12 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000035819 E11 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000035818 E10 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEFLDGW4000003191 D9 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEFLDGW4000003190 D8 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNWFLSO80000028273 B6 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSEFLSO80000052288 C5 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSEFLSO80000052287 C4 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNWFLSO80000028272 B3 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ESEFLSO80000015717 A2 1/8 - 1/4 Mile ESEFLSO80000015716 A1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEUSGS40000235891 G16 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ESEUSGS40000235893 D7 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 0.001 milesFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 353 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1137 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-10 1/2 - 1 Mile ENEFLSO80000021536 K29 1/2 - 1 Mile ENEFLSO80000021537 K28 1/2 - 1 Mile ENEFLSO80000021535 K27 1/2 - 1 Mile ENEFLSO80000021533 K26 1/2 - 1 Mile ENEFLSO80000021534 K25 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000051243 J24 1/2 - 1 Mile SEFLSO80000028079 23 1/2 - 1 Mile SEFLSO80000051242 J22 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 354 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1138 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. FL 355 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1139 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-12 PFacwlsts c:INJUsests cod: 80Cased dept: 100Well depth: 698590Pump coo 1: 388230Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: #N/APumptype c: #2 InjectionFac name: WELLFacinv typ: 229597Id: 1Acres serv: INDLu code: REGATTA AT VANDERBILT BEACH COMMONS ASSOCIAProject na:GPActual per: 090505-4App no:11-03020-WPermit no: A2 ESE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000015717FL WELLS FLSO80000015716Site id: GP MINFee catego:Lindy Cerar, P.G.Display na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 80Cased dept: 100Well depth: 698630Pump coo 1: 388030Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 40Pump intak: 60Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: #1 SupplyFac name: WELLFacinv typ: 229596Id: 1Acres serv: INDLu code: REGATTA AT VANDERBILT BEACH COMMONS ASSOCIAProject na:GPActual per: 090505-4App no:11-03020-WPermit no: A1 ESE 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSO80000015716FL WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 356 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1140 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-13 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 60Cased dept: 70Well depth: 696940Pump coo 1: 387958Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 6Pump intak: 30Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Supply Well - 1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 165470Id: 6Acres serv: INDLu code: SALERNO AT BAY COLONYProject na:GPActual per: 041220-3App no:11-02367-WPermit no: C4 SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000052287FL WELLS FLSO80000028272Site id: GP MINFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 80Cased dept: 100Well depth: 701104Pump coo 1: 386173Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 60Pump intak: 90Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: JETPumptype c: Well 1 WithdrawalFac name: WELLFacinv typ: 255795Id: 1Acres serv: INDLu code: LE DAUPHIN A CONDOMINIUMProject na:GPActual per: 100609-11App no:11-03156-WPermit no: B3 NNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000028272FL WELLS FLSO80000015717Site id: GP MINFee catego:Lindy Cerar, P.G.Display na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 357 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1141 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-14 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 80Cased dept: 100Well depth: 701257Pump coo 1: 386102Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: JETPumptype c: Well 2 InjectionFac name: WELLFacinv typ: 255796Id: 1Acres serv: INDLu code: LE DAUPHIN A CONDOMINIUMProject na:GPActual per: 100609-11App no:11-03156-WPermit no: B6 NNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000028273FL WELLS FLSO80000052288Site id: GP MINFee catego:Saurabh SrivastavaDisplay na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:INJUsests cod: 60Cased dept: 70Well depth: 696940Pump coo 1: 387958Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 6Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Injection Well - 2Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 165472Id: 6Acres serv: INDLu code: SALERNO AT BAY COLONYProject na:GPActual per: 041220-3App no:11-02367-WPermit no: C5 SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000052288FL WELLS FLSO80000052287Site id: GP MINFee catego:Saurabh SrivastavaDisplay na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 358 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1142 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-15 2001-04-17 5.28 2001-03-19 5.04 2001-06-18 4.60 2001-05-22 4.58 2001-08-20 5.74 2001-07-16 6.61 2001-10-26 6.20 2001-10-05 6.64 2001-12-20 4.98 2001-11-23 5.74 2002-02-20 5.23 2002-01-23 5.77 2002-04-19 5.42 2002-03-19 5.02 2002-06-18 6.20 2002-05-24 5.34 2002-08-19 6.70 2002-07-23 6.14 2002-10-22 6.29 2002-10-03 6.25 2002-12-17 6.09 2002-11-18 6.47 2003-04-01 5.59 2003-02-24 5.69 2003-05-19 5.46 2003-04-17 5.35 2003-07-21 5.83 2003-06-25 7.38 2003-09-16 6.09 2003-08-20 7.43 2003-11-17 5.88 2003-10-20 5.89 2004-01-26 5.62 2003-12-16 5.85 2004-03-23 5.53 2004-02-18 5.78 2004-05-19 5.50 2004-04-22 5.35 2004-07-26 6.34 2004-06-09 5.03 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 208 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 23Welldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Unconfined single aquiferAquifer type: Nonartesian Sand AquiferFormation type: Surficial aquifer systemAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Level or other surveying methodVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: .1Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 8.74Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: Not ReportedSourcemap scale:-81.8142546Longitude: 26.2528648Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:03090204Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: C - 999Monloc name: USGS-261508081484902Monloc Identifier: USGS Florida Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-FLOrg. Identifier: D7 ESE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher USGS40000235893FED USGS FLSO80000028273Site id: GP MINFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 359 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1143 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-16 1990-02-27 3.98 1990-01-31 3.98 1990-04-23 3.38 1990-03-30 3.50 1990-06-25 4.44 1990-05-23 4.01 1990-08-27 5.27 1990-07-30 5.33 1990-10-23 5.34 1990-10-02 5.55 1990-12-28 4.20 1990-11-29 4.54 1991-02-19 5.00 1991-01-30 5.53 1991-04-25 5.50 1991-03-19 4.90 1991-06-17 6.00 1991-05-22 5.58 1991-08-20 5.46 1991-07-23 6.64 1991-10-22 5.55 1991-09-23 5.92 1991-12-18 4.75 1991-11-22 5.02 1992-02-18 4.85 1992-01-21 4.73 1992-04-22 5.17 1992-03-24 5.55 1992-06-25 6.60 1992-05-20 4.48 1992-08-19 8.00 1992-07-23 7.35 1992-10-22 5.42 1992-10-07 5.94 1992-12-14 4.75 1992-11-17 4.91 1993-02-18 5.12 1993-01-21 5.33 1993-04-19 4.93 1993-03-23 5.31 1993-06-26 4.95 1993-05-18 4.40 1993-08-27 5.32 1993-07-19 5.22 1993-10-27 6.58 1993-10-04 5.77 1993-12-22 4.69 1993-11-30 5.04 1994-02-23 4.69 1994-01-26 4.91 1994-04-29 4.26 1994-03-30 4.73 1994-06-24 4.49 1994-05-25 3.69 1994-08-23 5.67 1994-07-26 5.55 1994-10-31 5.23 1994-10-04 6.15 1995-04-27 5.21 1995-01-26 5.53 1995-10-25 6.79 1995-07-26 6.34 1996-04-24 5.85 1996-01-31 5.31 1996-10-30 5.76 1996-07-23 6.19 1996-12-20 4.91 1996-11-26 5.20 1997-02-27 4.79 1997-01-29 4.75 1997-04-23 4.86 1997-03-27 4.49 1997-06-30 6.04 1997-05-29 5.05 1997-08-26 6.13 1997-07-29 6.10 1997-10-29 5.72 1997-10-01 6.10 1998-01-06 6.09 1997-11-26 6.68 1998-02-25 6.41 1998-01-30 6.11 1998-04-29 5.60 1998-03-26 6.46 1999-02-19 5.70 1999-01-28 3.75 1999-04-23 5.01 1999-03-29 5.25 1999-07-01 6.27 1999-05-25 4.75 1999-08-24 6.50 1999-07-28 5.75 1999-10-26 5.95 1999-10-04 6.50 1999-12-20 5.50 1999-11-17 5.80 2000-02-24 4.80 2000-01-20 5.05 2000-04-24 4.75 2000-03-24 4.85 2000-06-28 5.70 2000-05-22 4.53 2000-08-21 6.40 2000-07-17 5.67 2000-10-24 5.54 2000-10-02 6.35 2000-12-18 5.20 2000-11-20 5.10 2001-02-22 4.74 2001-01-25 4.88 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, continued. ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 360 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1144 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-17 0Well scr 1: 0Well scree: 0Well casin: 22Well total: 30-DEC-99Well drill: GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING WELLWell statu: NAD27Dcd datum : UNKNCmcd coord: 49Long ss: 48Long mm: 81Long dd: 8Lat ss: 15Lat mm: 26Lat dd: UNCONFINED AQUIFERResource t: SURFICIAL AQUIFER SYSTEMWaterbody : Not ReportedStation al: C-00999Station na: 2879Fk station: 3130Objectid: D8 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLDGW4000003190FL WELLS 1985-05-28 1.80 1985-04-22 2.79 1985-07-29 6.07 1985-06-27 2.61 1985-09-25 4.89 1985-08-28 5.07 1985-11-01 3.64 1985-10-31 3.67 1985-12-31 3.47 1985-11-27 3.21 1986-02-26 1.77 1986-01-29 3.36 1986-04-24 2.67 1986-03-28 2.95 1986-06-27 2.97 1986-05-28 2.90 1986-08-25 5.12 1986-07-28 1.56 1986-10-31 4.39 1986-09-22 3.91 1986-12-30 3.72 1986-11-25 3.64 1987-02-24 3.15 1987-01-30 2.98 1987-04-23 3.98 1987-03-26 4.05 1987-06-25 2.72 1987-05-27 3.07 1987-08-27 3.52 1987-07-28 2.68 1987-10-30 4.83 1987-09-29 4.39 1987-12-29 4.41 1987-11-24 5.20 1988-02-24 4.11 1988-01-27 4.35 1988-04-25 3.58 1988-03-30 3.99 1988-06-28 3.03 1988-05-25 3.22 1988-08-30 4.17 1988-07-26 3.37 1988-10-26 1.75 1988-10-05 3.87 1988-12-28 2.76 1988-11-30 1.98 1989-02-23 2.53 1989-01-25 2.50 1989-04-26 3.79 1989-03-30 3.41 1989-06-26 4.21 1989-06-02 3.48 1989-08-29 4.89 1989-07-24 4.19 1989-10-27 5.31 1989-10-03 4.92 1989-12-28 4.45 1989-11-28 4.28 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, continued. ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 361 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1145 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-18 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 15Cased dept: 25Well depth: 701720Pump coo 1: 386021Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 50Pump capac: 6Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: N/APumptype c: PW-1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 100641Id: 2.8Acres serv: LANLu code: CONNOR PARKProject na:GPActual per: 000720-4App no:11-01854-WPermit no: E10 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000035818FL WELLS FLDGW4000003191Site id: GALVANIZED IRON OR GALVANIZED STEELWell cas 2: 4Well cas 1: 0Well scr 1: 0Well scree: 0Well casin: 22Well total: 30-DEC-99Well drill: GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING WELLWell statu: NAD27Dcd datum : UNKNCmcd coord: 49Long ss: 48Long mm: 81Long dd: 8Lat ss: 15Lat mm: 26Lat dd: UNCONFINED AQUIFERResource t: SURFICIAL AQUIFER SYSTEMWaterbody : Not ReportedStation al: C-00999Station na: 2879Fk station: 3131Objectid: D9 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLDGW4000003191FL WELLS FLDGW4000003190Site id: GALVANIZED IRON OR GALVANIZED STEELWell cas 2: 4Well cas 1: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 362 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1146 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-19 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 60Cased dept: 70Well depth: 700470Pump coo 1: 389370Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 30Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Well #1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 115676Id: 6Acres serv: INDLu code: BEACHWALKProject na:GPActual per: 011210-2App no:11-02042-WPermit no: F12 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000038507FL WELLS FLSO80000035819Site id: GPFee catego:Lee WerstDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 15Cased dept: 25Well depth: 701720Pump coo 1: 386021Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 50Pump capac: 6Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: N/APumptype c: PW-2Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 100643Id: 2.8Acres serv: LANLu code: CONNOR PARKProject na:GPActual per: 000720-4App no:11-01854-WPermit no: E11 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000035819FL WELLS FLSO80000035818Site id: GPFee catego:Lee WerstDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 363 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1147 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-20 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 40Cased dept: 60Well depth: 698484Pump coo 1: 389874Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 50Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: #N/APumptype c: 1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 28210Id: 4.5Acres serv: OTHLu code: THE POINTE AT PELICAN BAY IProject na:GPActual per: 980827-22App no:11-01626-WPermit no: G14 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000035839FL WELLS FLSO80000038508Site id: GPFee catego:Lee WerstDisplay na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 60Cased dept: 70Well depth: 700470Pump coo 1: 389370Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 30Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Well #2Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 115677Id: 6Acres serv: INDLu code: BEACHWALKProject na:GPActual per: 011210-2App no:11-02042-WPermit no: F13 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000038508FL WELLS FLSO80000038507Site id: GPFee catego:Lee WerstDisplay na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 364 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1148 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-21 Nonartesian Sand AquiferFormation type: Surficial aquifer systemAquifername: USCountrycode:Not ReportedVert coord refsys: Not ReportedVertcollection method: Not ReportedVert accmeasure units: Not ReportedVertacc measure val:Not ReportedVert measure units: Not ReportedVert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: UnknownHoriz Acc measure units:UnknownHoriz Acc measure: Not ReportedSourcemap scale:-81.8123101Longitude: 26.2523093Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:03090204Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: C - 319Monloc name: USGS-261507081484501Monloc Identifier: USGS Florida Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-FLOrg. Identifier: G16 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher USGS40000235891FED USGS FLSO80000039567Site id: GPFee catego:Nancy Demonstranti, P.G.Display na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 60Cased dept: 70Well depth: 698329Pump coo 1: 389948Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Injection WellFac name: WELLFacinv typ: 105563Id: 6Acres serv: INDLu code: BEACHWALKProject na:GPActual per: 010319-11App no:11-01922-WPermit no: G15 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000039567FL WELLS FLSO80000035839Site id: GPFee catego:Lee WerstDisplay na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: #N/AFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 365 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1149 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-22 H18 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000001933FL WELLS FLSO80000039566Site id: GPFee catego:Nancy Demonstranti, P.G.Display na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 60Cased dept: 70Well depth: 698318Pump coo 1: 389963Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 30Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Supply WellFac name: WELLFacinv typ: 105562Id: 6Acres serv: INDLu code: BEACHWALKProject na:GPActual per: 010319-11App no:11-01922-WPermit no: G17 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000039566FL WELLS 1977-05-19 2.82 1976-10-14 3.99 1978-05-04 3.51 1977-10-17 3.67 1978-10-23 4.51 1978-10-19 3.64 1979-10-23 4.51 1979-05-24 2.33 1980-10-15 6.95 1980-05-21 2.57 1981-10-22 3.67 1981-05-05 4.58 1983-10-24 3.87 1982-04-20 2.11 1984-10-17 3.26 1984-04-26 1.51 1984-12-26 2.54 1984-11-27 2.70 1985-02-26 2.26 1985-01-29 2.39 1985-04-22 2.68 1985-03-27 2.36 1985-06-27 2.58 1985-05-28 1.73 1985-09-25 4.89 1985-07-29 6.07 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 26 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 11.5Welldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 366 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1150 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-23 FLSO80000001934Site id: GP MINFee catego:Kimberly ArnoldDisplay na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRODUsests cod: 60Cased dept: 70Well depth: 696253Pump coo 1: 388936Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: WELL #2Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 154169Id: 6Acres serv: INDLu code: TRIESTE AT BAY COLONYProject na:GPActual per: 040602-10App no:11-02322-WPermit no: H19 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000001934FL WELLS FLSO80000001933Site id: GP MINFee catego:Kimberly ArnoldDisplay na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRODUsests cod: 60Cased dept: 70Well depth: 696273Pump coo 1: 388886Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 30Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: WELL #1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 154168Id: 6Acres serv: INDLu code: TRIESTE AT BAY COLONYProject na:GPActual per: 040602-10App no:11-02322-WPermit no: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 367 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1151 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-24 EFacwlsts c:INJUsests cod: 40Cased dept: 44Well depth: 703214Pump coo 1: 385596Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 2Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Injection WellFac name: WELLFacinv typ: 227107Id: 1Acres serv: INDLu code: BAYSHORES IProject na:GPActual per: 090106-6App no:11-02979-WPermit no: I21 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000053941FL WELLS FLSO80000053940Site id: GP MINFee catego:Taryn BoomgaardDisplay na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 40Cased dept: 44Well depth: 703152Pump coo 1: 385640Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 20Pump capac: 2Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Supply WellFac name: WELLFacinv typ: 227106Id: 1Acres serv: INDLu code: BAYSHORES IProject na:GPActual per: 090106-6App no:11-02979-WPermit no: I20 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000053940FL WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 368 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1152 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-25 EFacwlsts c:MONUsests cod: 10Cased dept: 13Well depth: 695535Pump coo 1: 389891Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: N/APumptype c: CO-2486Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 145297Id: 160Acres serv: GOLLu code: THE CLUB PELICAN BAYProject na:INDActual per: 100216-7App no:11-01715-WPermit no: 23 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000028079FL WELLS FLSO80000051242Site id: GPFee catego:John A. Lockwood, P.G.Display na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 60Cased dept: 70Well depth: 695320Pump coo 1: 389415Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 30Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: PW-1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 107514Id: 6Acres serv: INDLu code: CORONADO AT PELICAN BAYProject na:GPActual per: 010503-10App no:11-01944-WPermit no: J22 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000051242FL WELLS FLSO80000053941Site id: GP MINFee catego:Taryn BoomgaardDisplay na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 369 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1153 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-26 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 701061Pump coo 1: 391643Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 3Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 300Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 3Pump diame: CENPumptype c: SWP-2Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 268293Id: 1Acres serv: DEWLu code: 97TH AVENUE NORTH WATER AND SEWER REPLACEMProject na:GPActual per: 140418-15App no:11-03554-WPermit no: K25 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000021534FL WELLS FLSO80000051243Site id: GPFee catego:John A. Lockwood, P.G.Display na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:INJUsests cod: 60Cased dept: 70Well depth: 695050Pump coo 1: 389415Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: IW-1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 107515Id: 6Acres serv: INDLu code: CORONADO AT PELICAN BAYProject na:GPActual per: 010503-10App no:11-01944-WPermit no: J24 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000051243FL WELLS FLSO80000028079Site id: INDFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: MONFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 370 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1154 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-27 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 701061Pump coo 1: 391643Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 3Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 1600Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: CENPumptype c: SWP-3Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 268294Id: 1Acres serv: DEWLu code: 97TH AVENUE NORTH WATER AND SEWER REPLACEMProject na:GPActual per: 140418-15App no:11-03554-WPermit no: K27 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000021535FL WELLS FLSO80000021533Site id: STDEWFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table aquiferSource nam: MNDFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 701061Pump coo 1: 391643Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 3Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 1500Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 8Pump diame: HYDPumptype c: SWP-1Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 268292Id: 1Acres serv: DEWLu code: 97TH AVENUE NORTH WATER AND SEWER REPLACEMProject na:GPActual per: 140418-15App no:11-03554-WPermit no: K26 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000021533FL WELLS FLSO80000021534Site id: STDEWFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table aquiferSource nam: MNDFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 371 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1155 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-28 PFacwlsts c:STDUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 701061Pump coo 1: 391643Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 3Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 1600Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: CENPumptype c: SWP-4Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 268295Id: 1Acres serv: DEWLu code: 97TH AVENUE NORTH WATER AND SEWER REPLACEMProject na:GPActual per: 140418-15App no:11-03554-WPermit no: K29 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000021536FL WELLS FLSO80000021537Site id: STDEWFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table aquiferSource nam: MNDFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:STDUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 701061Pump coo 1: 391643Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 3Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 300Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 3Pump diame: HYDPumptype c: SWP-5Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 268296Id: 1Acres serv: DEWLu code: 97TH AVENUE NORTH WATER AND SEWER REPLACEMProject na:GPActual per: 140418-15App no:11-03554-WPermit no: K28 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000021537FL WELLS FLSO80000021535Site id: STDEWFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table aquiferSource nam: MNDFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 372 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1156 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-29 FLSO80000021536Site id: STDEWFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table aquiferSource nam: MNDFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 373 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1157 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TC4630846.2s Page A-30 Not Reported : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for COLLIER County: 3 Certified Residential Database27.316534108 ___________________________________________ Data Source% of sites>4pCi/LTotal BuildingsZip Radon Test Results State Database: FL Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® 374 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1158 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8238 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC4630846.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 375 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1159 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS DEP GWIS - Generalized Water Information System Well Data Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8507 Data collected for the Watershed Monitoring Section of the Department of Environmental Protection. DOH and DEP Historic Study of Private Wells Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-559-0901 Historic database for private supply wells. Well Construction Permitting Database Source: Northwest Florida Water Management District Telephone: 850-539-5999 Consumptive Use Permit Well Database Source: St. Johns River Water Management District Telephone: 386-329-4841 Permitted Well Location Database Source: South Florida Water Management District Telephone: 561-682-6877 Super Act Program Well Data This table consists of data relating to all privately and publicly owned potable wells investigated as part of the SUPER Act program. The Florida Department of Health’s SUPER Act Program (per Chapter 376.3071(4)(g), Florida Statutes), was given authority to provide field and laboratory services, toxicological risk assessments, investigations of drinking water contamination complaints and education of the public Source: Department of Health Telephone: 850-245-4250 Water Well Location Information Source: Suwannee River Water Management District Telephone: 386-796-7211 TC4630846.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 376 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1160 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Water Well Permit Database Source: Southwest Water Management District Telephone: 352-796-7211 OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION Florida Sinkholes Source: Department of Environmental Protection, Geological Survey The sinkhole data was gathered by the Florida Sinkhole Research Institute, University of Florida. Oil and Gas Permit Database Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-3194 Locations of all permitted wells in the state of Florida. RADON State Database: FL Radon Source: Department of Health Telephone: 850-245-4288 Zip Code Based Radon Data Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4630846.2s Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 377 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1161 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) January 20, 2016 Justin Finch Justin@southbaymarinafl.com Chapter(s) 62-761 /762, F.A.C., Non-Compliance Letter Collier County - Regulated Storage Tanks Southbay Marina 179 Southbay Dr. Naples, FL 34108 DEP Facility # 8735785 Dear Storage Tank Facility Owner/Operator: The Collier County Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Division (SHWMD) is contracted with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (Department) to conduct the Storage Tank System Compliance Verification Program for facilities located in Collier County. On January 12, 2016 a storage tank compliance inspection was conducted at the above referenced facility. A copy of the inspection report is enclosed for your review. Based on the inspection, you may not be operating in compliance with the requirements of Chapter(s) 62- 761/762, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). Any noncompliance items must be corrected immediately. Please provide a written response to this office within 30 days of receipt of this letter, and provide documentation to show that the issues addressed in the enclosed report and in this letter have been resolved. Please include the facility identification number on all correspondence. Your failure to a timely response may result in further enforcement action. Please be aware that violations of Chapter(s) 62-761/762, F.A.C., may subject you to penalties of up to $10,000.00 per day per violation, in addition to investigative costs. These penalties and costs may be imposed in accordance with Chapters 376 and 403, Florida Statutes. If you have any questions please contact Jay Standiford at 239-207-0981 or JamesStandiford@CollierGov.net. Sincerely, James A. Standiford IV (Jay) Environmental Specialist Public Utilities Department Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Division Enclosure: Storage Tank Compliance Inspection Report 378 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1162 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Storage Tank Facility Annual Compliance Site Inspection Report Division of Waste Management Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Twin Towers Office Bldg. 2600 Blair Stone Road. Tallahassee, Florida 32399- Florida Department of Environmental Protection Facility Information: Facility ID: Facility Name: Latitude: Longitude: LL Method:DPHO 81° 49' 17.6218'' 26° 15' 17.8808'' NAPLES, FL 34108 179 SOUTHBAY DR SOUTHBAY MARINA 8735785 Mineral Acid Tanks: USTs: # Of Inspected ASTs: Facility Type: Inspection Date: 0 1 0 V -Marine/Coastal Fuel Storage 01/12/2016 Inspection Result: Description: Result : Facility is Minor Out of Compliance. Minor Out of Compliance County:COLLIER 05/09/2015Effective Date:05/09/2016Expiration Date: Financial Responsibility HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANYInsurance Carrier: INSURANCEFinancial Responsibility: Findings: No Training Certificates are Available. Signatures: TKCOPC - COLLIER COUNTY SOLID & HAZ WASTE MGMT DEPT Storage Tank Program Office (239) 207-0920 Storage Tank Program Office Phone Number Activity Opened 01/12/2016 Page 1 of 7 Standiford, Jay 379 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1163 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Facility ID: 8735785 Jay Standiford INSPECTOR NAME INSPECTOR SIGNATURE Justin Finch (justin@southbaymarinafl.com) REPRESENTATIVE NAME REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE Owners of UST facilities are reminded that the Federal Energy Policy Act of 2005 requires Operator Training at all facilities by August 8, 2012. For further information please visit: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/tanks/pages/op_train.htm ReviewedResultsTypeDate Completed System Tests Next Due Date Comment To be completed 01/11/2017Annual Operability Test 01/13/2016 Performed on the Krueger fuel level gauge. 07/10/2016Breach of Integrity Test 01/13/2016 Required every 2 years on the Tank Tech (upgrade)/ Phoenix System. Note that Tank Tech should do this test or there is a threat of voiding the warranty. Overdue Tests 07/11/2015Annual Inline Leak Detector Test 07/22/2014 Completed Tests 03/22/2012PassedBreach of Integrity Test 07/10/2014 07/28/2014 Breach of integrity testing for the TANK TECH upgrade in place (tank) is required every 2 years. 01/12/2017PassedAnnual Operability Test 01/12/2016 01/13/2016 Performed on the Krueger Interstitial gauge. Failure to perform AO on the Krueger interstitial gauge (due 6/15/2015) was cited during the TCI but resolved since AO was performed during the TCI. Reviewed Records From Date To DateRecord Category Record Type Reviewed Record Comment 01/19/2015 12/14/2015Two Years Monthly Maint. Visual The facility had 1 year's Activity Opened 01/12/2016 Page 2 of 7 Standiford, Jay 380 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1164 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Facility ID: 8735785 Reviewed Records From Date To DateRecord Category Record Type Reviewed Record Comment Examinations and Results worth of MVI's. The facility must maintain two years of MVI's in accordance with FDEP F.A.C. Rule 62-761. New Violations Type:Violation Significance Minor Rule:62-761.710(2)(h), 62-761.710(2)(g), 62-761.710(2)(f), 62-761.710(2)(e), 62- 761.710(2)(d), 62-761.710(2)(c), 62-761.710(2)(b), 62-761.710(2)(a) Explanation: During the TCI, it was determined the facility only had 1 year's worth of MVI's (01/16/2015 to 12/14/2015). Violation Text: Records requiring 2 year documentation period not kept by facility. Corrective Action: The facility must maintain 2 years of MVI's. Type:Violation Significance Minor Rule:62-761.640(4)(a)4., 62-761.640(4)(a)3., 62-761.640(4)(a)2., 62-761.640(4)(a)1. Explanation: During the TCI, it was determined that ALLD testing was overdue (due 7/11/2015). Violation Text: UST line leak detector cannot detect a 3.0 gph discharge; not tested annually. Corrective Action: Please schedule the ALLD test. Once completed, please send the completed test report to the inspector via e-mail. Site Visit Comments EQUIPMENT: TANK: (1) DW fiberglass clad steel UST (Tank Tech Phoenix System), 2K gallons EF RUL Release mechanism/response level: -Krueger float gauge/ monitor for leaks SUMPS: 1-STP SUMP 2- TS’s (TS1-Fiberglass DWUP to MGAP & TS2- On dock) MLLD present in STP sump Release mechanism/response level: Visual PIPING: -Split runs of thermoplastic and fiberglass -Fiberglass DWUP -Environ MGAP under dock and above water -Piping interstices open in all 3 sumps Release mechanism/response level: Visual 01/12/2016 Activity Opened 01/12/2016 Page 3 of 7 Standiford, Jay 381 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1165 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Facility ID: 8735785 Site Visit Comments SPILL CONTAINMENT: 1-DWSB Satisfactory and free of liquids Release mechanism/response level: Visual of DWSB interstitial gauge AO was not performed on the DWSB interstitial gauge during the TCI due to the inspector not wanting to damage the component. OVERFILL PREVENTION: -OPV present in drop tube Satisfactory VENTING: -Coaxial drop tube -Vent riser is attached to the adjacent building (approx. 8 ft above building) w/PVC DISPENSER SUMP/HOSE/SHEAR VALVE: -1 dispenser w/ 1 EF RULH & Nozzle (clip removed) -1/4 inch PCW observed due to recent rain, please remove and properly dispose of the PCW -Piping enters from the bottom -Piping interstices open -Hose connection from dispenser to reel has minor cracking. Please monitor and replace as needed. -EF RULH satisfactory -Shear Valve satisfactory Release mechanism/response level: Visual (EF RULH- cracking/exposed core) EMERGENCY STOP: Located within 100 feet of the dispenser The facility closes every September on an annual basis. RECOMMENDATIONS: Please ensure an MVI is performed on the last day of August and the first day of October. Please ensure that Adams Tank and Lift performs annual operability testing on the DWSB interstice float gauge to ensure it operates correctly and record that on the MVI log as AO for DWSB. Once completed, please have that test result sent to the inspector via e-mail. Once the ALLD test is complete, please send it to the inspector via e-mail. Inspector: James (Jay) Standiford IV JamesStandiford@colliergov.net Environmental Specialist Collier County SHWMD 3339 Tamiami Trail E., Suite 302 Naples, FL 34112 239-207-0981- Work Cell Facility Representative: Justin Finch Dock Master South Bay Marina Inspection report e-mailed to Justin Finch (Justin@southbaymarinafl.com) Activity Opened 01/12/2016 Page 4 of 7 Standiford, Jay 382 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1166 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Facility ID: 8735785 Site Visit Comments Acronyms: ALLD- Annual Line Leak Detection AO- Annual Operability AST- Aboveground Storage Tank ATG- Automatic Tank Gauge API- American Petroleum Institute ASWP- Aboveground Single Walled Piping AV- Ambient Vent BOI- Breach of Integrity RUL- Regular Unleaded DSL- Diesel DSLH- Diesel Hose (Dispenses only diesel) DF- Dike Field DW- Double Walled DWF- Double Walled Fiberglass DWSB- Double Walled Spill Bucket DWUP- Double Walled Underground Piping DPVR- Dual Point Vapor Recovery ELLD- Electronic Line Leak Detection EF- Ethanol Free ERD- Electronic Release Detection E V- Emergency Vent F.A.C.- Florida Administrative Code FDEP- Florida Department of Environmental Protection FP- Fill Port FR- Financial Responsibility FRP- Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic GPH- Gallons Per Hour K- Thousand (Gallons) LEL- Lower Explosive Level MGAP- Marine Grade Aboveground Piping MLLD- Mechanical Line Leak Detection MUL- Mid Grade Unleaded MVI- Monthly Visual Inspections MWP- Man Way Port NFPA- National Fire Prevention Act NO- New Oil OPV- Overfill Protection Valve (Guillotine Valve in Drop Tube) PCW- Petroleum Contact Water PV- Primary Vent PVC- Pressure Vacuum Cap RD- Release Detection RDRL- Release Detection Response Level REC 90- Recreation 90 Octane REC 90H- Recreation 90 Hose RUL- Regular Unleaded SHWMD- Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Division SB- Spill Bucket STRF- Storage Tank Registration Form STP- Submersible Turbine Sump SV- Shear Valve SW- Single Walled 01/12/2016 Activity Opened 01/12/2016 Page 5 of 7 Standiford, Jay 383 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1167 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Facility ID: 8735785 Site Visit Comments TCAR- Tank Closure Assessment Report TCI- Storage Tank Compliance Inspection TCR- Storage Tank Re-Inspection (Non-Compliance) TIN- Storage Tank Installation Inspection TXI- Storage Tank Closure Inspection TK- Tank UL- Unleaded ULH- Unleaded Hose (Dispenses RUL and PUL) UO- Used Oil UST- Underground Storage Tank 2016-01-12 TCI Facility Pic 01/13/2016Added Date 2016-01-12 TCI Krueger Fuel Level Gauge AO Test 01/13/2016Added Date 2016-01-12 TCI Krueger Fuel Level Gauge 01/13/2016Added Date 2016-01-12 TCI TS1 01/13/2016Added Date Inspection Photos Activity Opened 01/12/2016 Page 6 of 7 Standiford, Jay 384 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1168 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Facility ID: 8735785 2016-01-12 TCI TS2 on Dock 01/13/2016Added Date 2016-01-12 TCI EF RUL Reel Connection Hose 01/13/2016Added Date 2016-01-12 TCI Dispener Sump 01/13/2016Added Date 2016-1-12 TCI E- Stop 01/13/2016Added Date Activity Opened 01/12/2016 Page 7 of 7 Standiford, Jay 385 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1169 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SOUTH DISTRICT P.O. BOX 2549 FORT MYERS, FL 33902-2549 RICK SCOTT GOVERNOR HERSCHEL T. VINYARD JR. SECRETARY www.dep.state.fl.us December 20, 2013 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Angie Opstad GLC Property Management 15 South 5th Street, Suite 910 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 E-mailed to: amyk@glcpropertymanagment.com Subject: Collier – TK/WC Site Rehabilitation Completion Order (SRCO) Approval South Bay Marina 179 Southbay Drive, Naples, Florida 34108 FDEP Facility ID No. 8735785 Discharge Date: March 16, 2010 Dear Ms. Opstad: The South District has reviewed the Site Rehabilitation Completion Report (SRCR) dated December 10, 2013 (received December 10, 2013), prepared and submitted by Nova Consulting Group, Inc. (Nova), for the referenced facility. All the documents submitted to date are adequate to meet the site assessment requirements of Chapter 62-780.600 Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The SRCR is hereby incorporated by reference in this Site Rehabilitation Completion Order (Order). Therefore, you are released from any further obligation to conduct site rehabilitation at the site for petroleum product contamination associated with the discharge referenced above, except as set forth below. 1) In the event concentrations of petroleum products’ contaminants of concern increase above the levels approved in this Order, or if a subsequent discharge of petroleum or petroleum product occurs at the site, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (Department) may require site rehabilitation to reduce concentrations of petroleum products’ contaminants of concern to the levels approved in the SRCO or otherwise allowed by Chapter 62-780, F.A.C. 2) Additionally, you are required to properly abandon all monitoring wells, except compliance wells required by Chapter 62-761, F.A.C., for release detection, within 60 days of receipt of this Order. The monitoring wells must be plugged and abandoned in accordance with the requirements of Subsection 62-532.500(5), F.A.C. 386 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1170 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Angie Opstad Facility ID No. 8735785 December 20, 2013 Page 2 of 4 Legal Issues The Department’s Order shall become final unless a timely petition for an administrative hearing is filed under sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes (F.S.), within 21 days of receipt of this Order. The procedures for petitioning for an administrative hearing are set forth below. Persons affected by this Order have the following options: 1) If you choose to accept the Department’s decision regarding the SRCR and completion of monitoring pursuant to the approved Remedial Action Plan (RAP) you do not have to do anything. This Order is final and effective on the date filed with the Clerk of the Department, which is indicated on the last page of this Order. 2) If you choose to challenge the decision, you may do the following: a) File a request for an extension of time to file a petition for an administrative hearing with the Department’s Agency Clerk in the Office of General Counsel within 21 days of receipt of this Order; such a request should be made if you wish to meet with the Department in an attempt to informally resolve any disputes without first filing a petition for an administrative hearing; or b) File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Department’s Agency Clerk in the Office of General Counsel within 21 days of receipt of this Order. Please be advised that mediation of this decision pursuant to section 120.573, F.S., is not available. How to Request an Extension of Time to File a Petition for an Administrative Hearing For good cause shown, pursuant to subsection 62-110.106(4), F.A.C., the Department may grant a request for an extension of time to file a petition for an administrative hearing. Such a request must be filed (received) by the Department’s Agency Clerk in the Office of General Counsel at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-3000, within 21 days of receipt of this Order. Petitioner, if different from GLC Property Management, shall mail a copy of the request to Ms. Angie Opstad (amyk@glcpropertymanament.com), GCL Property Management, 15 South 5th Street, Suite 910, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, at the time of filing. Timely filing a request for an extension of time tolls the time period within which a petition for an administrative hearing must be made. How to File a Petition for an Administrative Hearing A person whose substantial interests are affected by this Order may petition for an administrative hearing under sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. The petition must contain the information set forth below and must be filed (received) by the Department’s Agency Clerk in the Office of General Counsel at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida, 387 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1171 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Angie Opstad Facility ID No. 8735785 December 20, 2013 Page 3 of 4 32399-3000, within 21 days of receipt of this Order. Petitioner, if different from GLC Property Management, shall mail a copy of the request to Ms. Angie Opstad (amyk@glcpropertymanament.com), GCL Property Management, 15 South 5th Street, Suite 910, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, at the time of filing. Failure to file a petition within this time period shall waive the right of anyone who may request an administrative hearing under sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. Pursuant to subsection 120.569(2), F.S. and rule 28-106.201, F.A.C., a petition for an administrative hearing shall contain the following information: a) The name, address, and telephone number of each petitioner; the name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner’s representative, if any; the facility owner’s name and address, if different from the petitioner; the FDEP facility number, and the name and address of the facility; b) A statement of when and how each petitioner received notice of the Department’s action or proposed action; c) An explanation of how each petitioner’s substantial interests are or will be affected by the Department’s action or proposed action; d) A statement of the disputed issues of material fact, or a statement that there are no disputed facts; e) A statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including a statement of the specific facts the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the Department’s action or proposed action; f) A statement of the specific rules or statutes the petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the Department’s action or proposed action; and g) A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action petitioner wishes the Department to take with respect to the Department’s action or proposed action. This Order is final and effective on the date filed with the Clerk of the Department, which is indicated on the last page of this Order. Timely filing a petition for an administrative hearing postpones the date this Order takes effect until the Department issues either a final order pursuant to an administrative hearing or an Order Responding to Supplemental Information provided to the Department pursuant to meetings with the Department. Judicial Review Any party to this Order has the right to seek judicial review of it under section 120.68, F.S., by filing a notice of appeal under rule 9.110 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure with the 388 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1172 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Angie Opstad Facility ID No. 8735785 December 20, 2013 Page 4 of 4 Department’s Agency Clerk in the Office of General Counsel at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-3000, and by filing a copy of the notice of appeal accompanied by the applicable filing fees with the appropriate district court of appeal. The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after this Order is filed with the Department’s clerk (see below). Questions Any questions regarding the Department’s technical review of the Site Rehabilitation Completion Report (SRCR) should be directed to Mark A. Sautter at (239) 344-5690 or Mark.Sautter@dep.state.fl.us. Whenever possible, please submit any written response(s) electronically to FTM.Tanks.Cleanup@dep.state.fl.us. Questions regarding legal issues should be referred to the Department’s Office of General Counsel at (850) 245-2242. Contact with any of the above does not constitute a petition for an administrative hearing or a request for an extension of time to file a petition for an administrative hearing. The FDEP Facility Number for this site is 8735785. Please use this identification on all future correspondence with the Department. Sincerely, Jon M. Iglehart Director of District Management South District JMI/MAS/rcd Enclosures: (1) December 18, 2013 Department Interoffice Memorandum (2) Site Rehabilitation Completion Order (SRCO) Approval (3) Table 3: Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results (4) Figure 4: Groundwater Elevation Contour Map cc: Mikes Hayes – Nova (Mike.Hayes@novaconsulting.com) Albert D. McLaurin – FDEP (Albert.McLaurin@dep.state.fl.us) Charles A. Masella – FDEP (Charles.Masella@dep.state.fl.us) James Standiford – FDEP (James.Standiford@dep.state.fl.us) FILING AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT FILED, on this date, pursuant to §120.52 Florida Statutes, with the designated Department Clerk, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. December 20, 2013 Clerk Date 389 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1173 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SOUTH DISTRICT P.O. BOX 2549 FORT MYERS, FL 33902-2549 RICK SCOTT GOVERNOR HERSCHEL T. VINYARD JR. SECRETARY www.dep.state.fl.us To: Charles A. Masella Waste Cleanup Program – South District CAP From: Mark A. Sautter Waste Cleanup Program – South District CAP Date: December 18, 2013 Subject: Collier County – TK/WC Site Rehabilitation Completion Report (SRCR) South Bay Marina 179 Southbay Drive, Naples, Florida 34108 Facility ID: 8735785 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Waste Cleanup Program – South District CAP has conducted a technical review of the Site Rehabilitation Completion Report (SRCR) for the South Bay Marina. The submittal was generated by Nova Consulting Group, Inc. (Nova), and received by the Department on December 10, 2013. Site activities were initiated to address the petroleum contaminant impacts discovered during the underground storage tank (UST) closure, prompting the submittal of the March 23, 2010 Discharge Report Form (DRF), and initiating a site assessment pursuant to Chapter 62- 777 Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The Natural Attenuation Monitoring Plan (NAMP) was approved in a Department letter dated September 8, 2011. The NAMP was reduced to semi-annual monitoring events in a Department letter dated September 20, 2012. On October 28, 2013 Nova personnel collected groundwater samples from groundwater monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3. The collected samples were submitted for laboratory analysis by EPA Method 8021 for Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylenes, and Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (BTEX/MTBE). The results of the laboratory analysis revealed that none of the constituents of concern were detected in concentrations exceeding their respective Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Rule 62-777 Groundwater Cleanup Target Level (GCTL). Summary: The Waste Cleanup Program – South District CAP has completed our technical review of the Site Rehabilitation Completion Report (SRCR) for the South Bay Marina facility (Facility I.D. #8735785). We concur with the environmental consultant that the site qualifies for a No Further Action status. No further assessment or action is warranted for this facility. A Site Rehabilitation Completion Approval (SRCA) is appropriate, and pursuant to Chapter 62- 780.680(1) No Further Action Risk Management Options Level-I (NFA RMO-I) status is approved for the South Bay Marina (Facility I.D. #8735785). Upon receipt of the No Further Action (NFA) approval letter, the responsible party shall properly abandon all groundwater monitoring wells and any piezometers pursuant to South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) guidelines. 390 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1174 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) SRCO Approval Attachment SRCO for FAC ID # 8735785 South Bay Marina 179 Southbay Drive Naples, Florida 34108 Discharge Date: March 16, 2010 Facility ID: 8735785 I hereby certify that in my judgment, the components of this Site Rehabilitation Completion Order (SRCO) satisfy the requirements set forth in Chapter 62-780.680(1), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), No Further Action Risk Management Options Level-I (NFA RMO-I) and that the conclusions in this report provide reasonable assurances that the objectives in Chapter 62-780.680(1), F.A.C., have been met. I personally completed this review. X This review was conducted by Mark A. Sautter working under my direct supervision. Charles A. Masella Projects Manager Waste Cleanup Program/Storage Tank Program Division of Waste Management – South District CAP December 18, 2013 Date 391 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1175 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TABLE 3SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1Sample Date 5/19/2010 11/30/2010 4/14/2011 6/16/2011 10/6/2011 1/19/2012 4/18/2012 7/26/2012 1/24/2013 9/26/2013 10/28/2013 CTLsPRO (ug/l)<130<130~~~~~~~~~5,000VOAsAcetone (ug/l) <8.9<16~~~~~~~~~6,300Benzene (ug/l)<0.29 <0.23 <0.13 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.19 <0.19 0.23 (E)1Ethylbenzene (ug/l)171.60.78 0.37 (E) 0.65<0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.16 <0.16 <0.1630Isopropylbenzene (ug/l) 1.11.3~~~~~~~~~0.8Methylene Chloride (ug/l)<0.30.94 (E)~~~~~~~~~NL2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)2.5~~~~~~~~~~28Methyl-tert-butyl-ether (ug/l)1108758553448553338131720Naphthalene (ug/l)2.2<0.98~~~~~~~~~14n-Propylbenzene (ug/l)1.41.3~~~~~~~~~NLToluene (ug/l)<0.27 <0.32 1 (E)<0.3<0.3<0.3<0.3<0.3<0.18 1.3 (E) <0.1840Trichloroethene (ug/l) <0.370.43 (E)~~~~~~~~~*0.005Total Xylenes (ug/l)<0.86 <0.86 1.1 (E) <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.51 <0.51 <0.5120PAHsAcenaphthene (ug/l)0.0880.11~~~~~~~~~20Acenaphthylene (ug/l)0.037 0.063~~~~~~~~~210Fluorene (ug/l) 0.050.061~~~~~~~~~2802-Chloronaphthalene (ug/l)<0.014 0.02 (E)~~~~~~~~~5601-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)1.50.64~~~~~~~~~282-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)0.110.079 (E)~~~~~~~~~28Naphthalene (ug/l)1.3 0.021 (E)~~~~~~~~~14Phenanthrene (ug/l)<0.018 <0.0069~~~~~~~~~210Notes:CTLs = Florida Groundwater Cleanup Target Levels - Groundwater criteria.< = Less than laboratory method detection limit (MDL).PRO = Petroleum Range Organics.VOA = Volitile Organic Analysis.PAH = Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons.Concentrations in bold and shaded at or above CTLs. ~ = Sample was not analyzed for this parameter.NL = Parameter is not listed in CTLs. E = Estimated value below lowest calibration point.* = National Primary Drinking Water Standard - Maximum Contaminant Level.SOUTH BAY MARINANAPLES, FLORIDAProject No. W10-0854392 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1176Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TABLE 3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2Sample Date 5/19/2010 11/30/2010 4/14/2011 6/16/2011 10/6/2011 1/19/2012 4/18/2012 7/26/2012 1/24/2013 9/26/2013 10/28/2013 CTLsPRO (ug/l)<130<130~~~~~~~~~5,000VOAsAcetone (ug/l) <8.9<16~~~~~~~~~6,300Benzene (ug/l)<0.29 <0.23 <0.13 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.19 <0.19 <0.191Ethylbenzene (ug/l)<0.22 <0.22 <0.21 <0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.16 <0.16 <0.1630Isopropylbenzene (ug/l) <0.19<0.2~~~~~~~~~0.8Methylene Chloride (ug/l)<0.3<0.91~~~~~~~~~NL2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)<0.43~~~~~~~~~~28Methyl-tert-butyl-ether (ug/l)201419192.9122420243.46.420Naphthalene (ug/l)<0.17 <0.98~~~~~~~~~14n-Propylbenzene (ug/l)<0.22 <0.31~~~~~~~~~NLToluene (ug/l)<0.27 <0.32 0.26 (E) <0.3 0.43 (E) <0.3<0.3<0.3<0.18 1.3 (E)8.640Trichloroethene (ug/l) <0.37<0.31~~~~~~~~~*0.005Total Xylenes (ug/l)<0.86 <0.86 <0.43 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.51 <0.51 <0.5120PAHsAcenaphthene (ug/l)0.022 0.028 (E)~~~~~~~~~20Acenaphthylene (ug/l)0.022 0.021 (E)~~~~~~~~~210Fluorene (ug/l) 0.013<0.0048~~~~~~~~~2802-Chloronaphthalene (ug/l)<0.014 <0.0054~~~~~~~~~5601-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)<0.014 <0.0069~~~~~~~~~282-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)<0.014<0.007~~~~~~~~~28Naphthalene (ug/l)0.039 <0.01~~~~~~~~~14Phenanthrene (ug/l)<0.018 0.01 (E)~~~~~~~~~210Notes:CTLs = Florida Groundwater Cleanup Target Levels - Groundwater criteria.< = Less than laboratory method detection limit (MDL).PRO = Petroleum Range Organics.VOA = Volitile Organic Analysis.PAH = Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons.Concentrations in bold and shaded at or above CTLs. ~ = Sample was not analyzed for this parameter.NL = Parameter is not listed in CTLs. E = Estimated value below lowest calibration point.* = National Primary Drinking Water Standard - Maximum Contaminant Level.SOUTH BAY MARINANAPLES, FLORIDAProject No. W10-0854393 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1177Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TABLE 3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3Sample Date 5/19/2010 11/30/2010 4/14/2011 6/16/2011 10/6/2011 1/19/2012 4/18/2012 7/26/2012 1/24/2013 9/26/2013 10/28/2013 CTLsPRO (ug/l)<130<130~~~~~~~~~5,000VOAsAcetone (ug/l)12<16~~~~~~~~~6,300Benzene (ug/l)<0.29 <0.23 <0.13 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.19 <0.19 <0.191Ethylbenzene (ug/l)<0.22 <0.22 <0.21 <0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.16 <0.16 <0.1630Isopropylbenzene (ug/l) <0.19<0.2~~~~~~~~~0.8Methylene Chloride (ug/l)<0.31.5 (E)~~~~~~~~~NL2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)<0.43~~~~~~~~~~28Methyl-tert-butyl-ether (ug/l)401818267.917241932131220Naphthalene (ug/l)<0.17 <0.98~~~~~~~~~14n-Propylbenzene (ug/l)<0.22 <0.31~~~~~~~~~NLToluene<0.27 <0.32 0.56 (E) <0.3<0.3<0.3<0.3<0.56 <0.18 0.22 (E) <0.1840Trichloroethene (ug/l) <0.37<0.31~~~~~~~~~*0.005Total Xylenes<0.86 <0.86 <0.43 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.51 <0.51 <0.5120PAHsAcenaphthene (ug/l)0.04 <0.014~~~~~~~~~20Acenaphthylene (ug/l)<0.017 <0.0095~~~~~~~~~210Fluorene (ug/l) 0.012<0.0048~~~~~~~~~2802-Chloronaphthalene (ug/l)<0.014 <0.0054~~~~~~~~~5601-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)0.06 0.011 (E)~~~~~~~~~282-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)<0.014<0.007~~~~~~~~~28Naphthalene (ug/l)0.03 0.012 (E)~~~~~~~~~14Phenanthrene (ug/l)<0.018 0.012 (E)~~~~~~~~~210Notes:CTLs = Florida Groundwater Cleanup Target Levels - Groundwater criteria.< = Less than laboratory method detection limit (MDL).PRO = Petroleum Range Organics.VOA = Volitile Organic Analysis.PAH = Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons.Concentrations in bold and shaded at or above CTLs.~ = Sample was not analyzed for this parameter.NL = Parameter is not listed in CTLs. E = Estimated value below lowest calibration point.* = National Primary Drinking Water Standard - Maximum Contaminant Level.SOUTH BAY MARINANAPLES, FLORIDAProject No. W10-0854394 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1178Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TABLE 3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS MW-4 MW-4 MW-5 MW-5Sample Date 5/19/2010 11/30/2010 5/19/2010 11/30/2010 CTLsPRO (ug/l)<130 <130 <130 <1305,000VOAsAcetone (ug/l)<8.9<16<8.9<166,300Benzene (ug/l)<0.29 <0.23 <0.29 <0.231Ethylbenzene (ug/l)<0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.2230Isopropylbenzene (ug/l)<0.19<0.2<0.19<0.20.8Methylene Chloride (ug/l)<0.3 1.6 (E) <0.3 1.5 (E)NL2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)<0.43~<0.43~28Methyl-tert-butyl-ether (ug/l)<0.19 <0.63 <0.19 <0.6320Naphthalene (ug/l)<0.17 <0.98 <0.17 <0.9814n-Propylbenzene (ug/l)<0.22 <0.31 <0.22 <0.31NLToluene<0.27 <0.32 <0.27 <0.3240Trichloroethene (ug/l)<0.37 <0.31 <0.37 <0.31*0.005Total Xylenes<0.86 <0.86 <0.86 <0.8620PAHsAcenaphthene (ug/l)<0.013 <0.014 <0.013 <0.01420Acenaphthylene (ug/l)<0.017 <0.0095 <0.017 <0.0095210Fluorene (ug/l)<0.012 <0.0048 <0.012 <0.00482802-Chloronaphthalene (ug/l)<0.014 <0.0054 <0.014 <0.00545601-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)<0.014 <0.0069 <0.014 <0.0069282-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)<0.014 <0.007 <0.014 <0.00728Naphthalene (ug/l)0.028 0.012 (E) <0.023 <0.0114Phenanthrene (ug/l)<0.018 <0.0069 <0.018 <0.0069210Notes:CTLs = Florida Groundwater Cleanup Target Levels - Groundwater criteria.< = Less than laboratory method detection limit (MDL).PRO = Petroleum Range Organics.VOA = Volitile Organic Analysis.PAH = Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons.Concentrations in boldand shaded at or above CTLs.~ = Sample was not analyzed for this parameter.NL = Parameter is not listed in CTLs. E = Estimated value below lowest calibration point.* = National Primary Drinking Water Standard - Maximum Contaminant Level.SOUTH BAY MARINANAPLES, FLORIDAProject No. W10-0854395 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1179Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR MAP - Without MW-4 (10/28/13) South Bay Marina 179 South Bay Drive Naples, Florida 34108 October 2013 MW-1 (4") (96.26') MW-2 (96.12') MW-5 (96.21')MW-3 (96.21') MW-4 Fence Supply Line Fuel Dispenser SITE = Monitoring Well 0'31' Scale: 1 Inch = 31 Feet LEGEND = Sewer line = Water line = Electric line = Communications line W10-0854 Figure 4 Surface Water Drainage GroundwaterFlow396 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1180 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Leaders in Environmental and Engineering Services NATURAL ATTENUATION GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT OCTOBER 2013 EVENT SOUTH BAY MARINA 179 SOUTH BAY DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108 NOVA PROJECT NUMBER: W10-0854 FDEP FACILITY ID NO. 8735785 REPORT DATE: DECEMBER 10, 2013 397 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1181 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NATURAL ATTENUATION GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT OCTOBER 2013 EVENT SOUTH BAY MARINA 179 SOUTH BAY DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108 NOVA PROJECT NUMBER: W10-0854 FDEP FACILITY ID NO. 8735785 DECEMBER 10, 2013 PREPARED FOR: GLC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 15 SOUTH 5TH STREET, SUITE 910 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 ATTN: MR. KEITH GRUEBELE PREPARED BY: NOVA CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 1107 HAZELTINE BLVD, SUITE 400 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 TEL: 952-448-9393 FAX: 952-448-9572 398 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1182 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT-10/13 SOUTH BAY MARINA – NAPLES, FL PAGE i NOVA PROJECT NO. W10-0854 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Authorization ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Background ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Objective ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Scope of Services....................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS ................................................................................... 3 2.1 Groundwater Elevations ........................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Groundwater Sampling and Analytical Results ............................................................ 3 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................ 5 4.0 STANDARD OF CARE ................................................................................................................. 6 TABLES 1. Monitoring Well Completion Information 2. Summary of Groundwater Elevation Data 3. Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results FIGURES 1. Site Location Map 2. Site Map 3. Hydrograph 4. Groundwater Elevation Contour Map – Without MW-4 (10/28/13) 5. MTBE Concentration Trends APPENDICES A. Methodologies B. Laboratory Chemical Analysis Report C. Field Sampling Sheets 399 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1183 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT-10/13 SOUTH BAY MARINA – NAPLES, FL PAGE 1 NOVA PROJECT NO. W10-0854 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Authorization In accordance with written authorization received from GLC Property Management, Nova Consulting Group, Inc. (Nova) conducted groundwater sampling at the South Bay Marina located at 179 South Bay Drive in Naples, Florida (the “Site”). A Site Location Map is included as Figure 1 and site features are depicted on Figure 2. 1.2 Background On March 4, 2010, Nova conducted an Underground Storage Tank (UST) Closure Assessment that consisted of advancing four (4) hand auger borings and sampling four (4) UST observation wells. The results of the analysis indicated that the soil and groundwater samples contained petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations that exceeded their respective Florida Cleanup Target Levels (CTLs). For additional information regarding the results of the UST Closure Assessment, please refer to the report titled: UST Closure Assessment, South Bay Marina, 179 South Bay Drive, Naples, Florida (Report dated March 19, 2010). Nova conducted a Site Assessment in 2010 that consisted of abandoning four (4) observation wells in the UST basin, the installation of four (4) groundwater monitoring wells (labeled MW-2 through MW-5), and conducting two (2) semi-annual groundwater monitoring events. For additional information regarding the results of the Site Assessment Report, please refer to the report titled: Remedial Investigation Report, South Bay Marina, 179 South Bay Drive, Naples, Florida (Report dated December 31, 2010). Nova completed an additional two (2) groundwater sampling events in April and June 2011 at the monitoring wells and reported the results in a Site Assessment Addendum Report. Groundwater samples were submitted for analysis of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX). For additional information regarding the results of the Site Assessment Report Addendum, please refer to the report titled: Site Assessment Report Addendum, South Bay Marina, 179 South Bay Drive, Naples, Florida (Report dated August 1, 2011). Nova completed an additional four (4) quarterly groundwater sampling events on monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3 between October 2011 and July 2012. Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Reports were submitted for each sampling event. Concentrations of MTBE exceeded the CTL at monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3. Nova made a recommendation to reduce the groundwater sampling frequency to semi-annual with additional sampling events in January and July 2013. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) approved the reduced sampling schedule in their letter dated September 20, 2012. 400 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1184 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT-10/13 SOUTH BAY MARINA – NAPLES, FL PAGE 2 NOVA PROJECT NO. W10-0854 1.3 Objective Based on the results of the September 2013 sampling event (below CTLs), the FDEP requested this additional sampling event in October 2013. The FDEP approved the October 2013 groundwater sampling event in their email dated October 15, 2013 and letter dated October 29, 2013. This report summarizes the results of the additional groundwater monitoring event conducted at the site on October 28, 2013. 1.4 Scope of Services The environmental services that Nova provided for this project included: • Measured static water levels at the monitoring wells and collected stabilization data in accordance with Florida Administrative Code 62-160 as detailed in Appendix A; • Conducted groundwater sampling at monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3 on October 28, 2013. Groundwater samples were submitted for analysis of MTBE and BTEX; and, • Completed this Natural Attenuation Groundwater Monitoring Report summarizing the groundwater sampling activities, results, and presenting conclusions and recommendations. 401 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1185 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT-10/13 SOUTH BAY MARINA – NAPLES, FL PAGE 3 NOVA PROJECT NO. W10-0854 2.0 PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS 2.1 Groundwater Elevations Nova personnel collected groundwater elevation measurements at the monitoring wells on October 28, 2013. Groundwater measurements were made using a Solinst electronic water level indicator. Groundwater measurements were recorded to the nearest 0.01 foot. The water level indicator was decontaminated before and after each measurement. Methods for collecting the groundwater elevations are presented in Appendix A. Top-of-casing elevations, depth-to-groundwater, and groundwater elevation measurements are presented in Table 2. As indicated in the groundwater hydrograph (Figure 3), groundwater elevations at MW-1 through MW-3 and MW-5 have had similar trends. However, the groundwater elevations at monitoring well MW-4 have had relatively large changes in elevation that have not been consistent with the other wells at the site. The surface water ditch located on the southwest side of the site pipes water under the south side of the site. Contributions from the surface water drainage may explain the variable water levels historically observed at monitoring well MW-4 and may influence the localized groundwater flow at the site along with tidal influences. Groundwater elevations decreased from the September 2013 sampling event. Groundwater elevation contours were derived utilizing Surfer contouring software. Figure 4 illustrates groundwater elevation contours generated for the October 2013 sampling event without the data from MW-4. As indicated on Figures 4, groundwater flow during the October 2013 sampling event at the site appears to be to the north with monitoring well MW-2 in a hydraulically downgradient direction. Historic groundwater flow directions have been variable from southeast to northeast. 2.2 Groundwater Sampling and Analytical Results Nova personnel collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3 on October 28, 2013. Prior to collecting the groundwater samples, the monitoring wells were purged in accordance to Florida guidance document FS 2200. A low flow peristaltic pump was utilized to purge the wells and then groundwater samples were collected through single use polyethylene tubing. The purging and sampling methods are detailed in Appendix A and the data are listed in the Groundwater Sampling Logs (Form FD 9000-24) that are included in Appendix C. The groundwater samples were placed in laboratory-supplied containers, stored in a cooler on ice, and transported to ESC in Mt. Juliet, TN under chain of custody protocol. The samples were chemically analyzed for the presence and concentration of MTBE and BTEX using EPA Method 8021. 402 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1186 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT-10/13 SOUTH BAY MARINA – NAPLES, FL PAGE 4 NOVA PROJECT NO. W10-0854 The reported concentrations of MTBE were below the CTL (20 micrograms-per-liter [ug/l]) at monitoring wells MW-1 (17 ug/l), MW-2 (6.4 ug/l), and MW-3 (12 ug/l). There was an estimated concentration of benzene (0.23 ug/l) reported at MW-1 that was below the CTL (1 ug/l). Toluene was reported at MW-2 (8.6 ug/l) at a concentration that did not exceed the CTL (40 ug/l). As shown in Table 2, the other sampled parameters at MW-1 through MW-3 were all below the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs). MTBE concentration trends are depicted on Figure 5. Chemical analysis results for groundwater samples are summarized in Table 3. The complete laboratory analytical report is presented in Appendix B. Field sampling forms are presented in Appendix C. 403 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1187 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT-10/13 SOUTH BAY MARINA – NAPLES, FL PAGE 5 NOVA PROJECT NO. W10-0854 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of the September 2013 sampling event (below CTLs), the FDEP requested this additional sampling event in October 2013. This report summarizes the results of the additional groundwater monitoring event conducted at the site on October 28, 2013. Groundwater elevations decreased from the September 2013 sampling event. Groundwater flow during the October 2013 sampling event at the site appears to be to the north with monitoring well MW-2 in a hydraulically downgradient direction. Historic groundwater flow directions have been variable from southeast to northeast. The reported concentrations of MTBE were below the CTL (20 ug/l) at monitoring wells MW-1 (17 ug/l), MW-2 (6.4 ug/l), and MW-3 (12 ug/l). There was an estimated concentration of benzene (0.23 ug/l) reported at MW-1 that was below the CTL (1 ug/l). Toluene was reported at MW-2 (8.6 ug/l) at a concentration that did not exceed the CTL (40 ug/l). As shown in Table 2, the other sampled parameters at MW-1 through MW-3 were all below the laboratory MDLs. The October 2013 groundwater monitoring event is the second consecutive sampling event with groundwater concentrations below the groundwater CTLs. We are requesting a Site Rehabilitation Completion Order (SRCO) requesting No Further Action (NFA) through Risk Management Option Level I (RMO I). 404 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1188 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT-10/13 SOUTH BAY MARINA – NAPLES, FL PAGE 6 NOVA PROJECT NO. W10-0854 4.0 STANDARD OF CARE The services performed by Nova on this project have been conducted with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of the profession, practicing in the same locality, under similar budget and time constraints. No other warranty is expressed or intended. This document was prepared exclusively for the use or benefit of those listed on the Title page of this report. Reliance or use by any other third party without explicit written authorization from Nova will be at the third party’s own risk. No warranties or representations, expressed or implied, are made to any such third party. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this service. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. NOVA CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Michael D. Hayes, FL PG # 2384 Phase II Leader / Hydrogeologist 12/10/13 405 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1189 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TABLES 406 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1190 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TABLE 1 MONITORING WELL COMPLETION INFORMATION Monitoring Well Date Installed Surface Elevation (feet) Top of Riser Elevation (feet) Bottom of Well Elevation (feet) Screened Interval (Elevation - Elevation) (feet) MW-1 Unknown 100.53 100.48 86.48 96.48-86.48 MW-2 5/18/2010 100.52 100.20 87.67 97.67-87.67 MW-3 5/18/2010 99.97 100.04 87.53 97.53-87.53 MW-4 5/18/2010 100.72 100.55 88.73 98.73-88.73 MW-5 5/18/2010 100.84 100.61 88.79 98.79-88.79 Top of riser and groundwater elevations referenced to assumed value of 100.00 feet. Reference Benchmark: SE corner of storm grate on NE corner of Gulf Shore Court and Southbay Drive. SOUTH BAY MARINA NAPLES, FLORIDA FDEP FACILITY I.D No. 11/8735785 NOVA PROJECT NO. W10-0854 407 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1191 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA Monitoring Well Date Measured Top of Casing Elevation (feet) Depth to Groundwater (feet) Depth to NAPL (feet) NAPL Thickness (feet) Depth of Groundwater Below Grade Top of screen Elevation (feet) Groundwater Elevation (feet) Water Level Above Screen (Y/N) MW-1 5/19/2010 100.48 3.85 NA NA 3.90 96.48 96.63 Y 11/30/2010 4.13 NA NA 4.18 96.35 N 4/14/2011 4.50 NA NA 4.55 95.98 N 6/16/2011 4.43 NA NA 4.48 96.05 N 10/6/2011 4.14 NA NA 4.19 96.34 N 1/19/2012 5.00 NA NA 5.05 95.48 N 4/18/2012 4.27 NA NA 4.32 96.21 N 7/25/2012 3.85 NA NA 3.90 96.63 Y 1/24/2013 4.99 NA NA 5.04 95.49 N 9/26/2013 3.06 NA NA 3.11 97.42 Y 10/28/2013 4.22 NA NA 4.27 96.26 N MW-2 5/19/2010 100.20 3.65 NA NA 3.97 97.67 96.55 N 11/30/2010 3.83 NA NA 4.15 96.37 N 4/14/2011 4.27 NA NA 4.59 95.93 N 6/16/2011 4.16 NA NA 4.48 96.04 N 10/6/2011 3.80 NA NA 4.12 96.40 N 1/19/2012 4.78 NA NA 5.10 95.42 N 4/18/2012 3.88 NA NA 4.20 96.32 N 7/25/2012 3.70 NA NA 4.02 96.50 N 1/24/2013 4.84 NA NA 5.16 95.36 N 9/26/2013 2.74 NA NA 3.06 97.46 N 10/28/2013 4.08 NA NA 4.40 96.12 N MW-3 5/19/2010 100.04 3.49 NA NA 3.42 97.53 96.55 N 11/30/2010 3.83 NA NA 3.76 96.21 N 4/14/2011 4.11 NA NA 4.04 95.93 N 6/16/2011 4.02 NA NA 3.95 96.02 N 10/6/2011 3.72 NA NA 3.65 96.32 N 1/19/2012 4.58 NA NA 4.51 95.46 N 4/18/2012 3.80 NA NA 3.73 96.24 N 7/25/2012 3.87 NA NA 3.80 96.17 N 1/24/2013 4.59 NA NA 4.52 95.45 N 9/26/2013 3.16 NA NA 3.09 96.88 N 10/28/2013 3.83 NA NA 3.76 96.21 N MW-4 5/19/2010 100.55 1.71 NA NA 1.88 98.73 98.84 Y 11/30/2010 4.20 NA NA 4.37 96.35 N 4/14/2011 4.62 NA NA 4.79 95.93 N 6/16/2011 4.99 NA NA 5.16 95.56 N 10/6/2011 3.14 NA NA 3.31 97.41 N 1/19/2012 5.45 NA NA 5.62 95.10 N 4/18/2012 4.69 NA NA 4.86 95.86 N 7/25/2012 2.60 NA NA 2.77 97.95 N 1/24/2013 5.37 NA NA 5.54 95.18 N 9/26/2013 0.86 NA NA 1.03 99.69 Y 10/28/2013 4.62 NA NA 4.79 95.93 N MW-5 5/19/2010 100.61 3.82 NA NA 4.05 98.79 96.79 N 11/30/2010 4.11 NA NA 4.34 96.50 N 4/14/2011 4.57 NA NA 4.80 96.04 N 6/16/2011 4.15 NA NA 4.38 96.46 N 10/6/2011 4.11 NA NA 4.34 96.50 N 1/19/2012 5.16 NA NA 5.39 95.45 N 4/18/2012 4.27 NA NA 4.50 96.34 N 7/25/2012 3.98 NA NA 4.21 96.63 N 1/24/2013 5.14 NA NA 5.37 95.47 N 9/26/2013 1.68 NA NA 1.91 98.93 Y 10/28/2013 4.40 NA NA 4.63 96.21 N Depth to groundwater measured in feet from top of casing (TOC). NAPL = Non Aqueous Phase Liquid. Top of riser and groundwater elevations referenced to an assumed elevation of 100.00 feet. Reference Benchmark: SE corner of storm grate on NE corner of Gulf Shore Court and Southbay Drive. NA= Not Applicable. SOUTH BAY MARINA NAPLES, FLORIDA FDEP FACILITY I.D No.: 8735785 NOVA PROJECT NO.: W10-0854 408 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1192 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TABLE 3SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1Sample Date 5/19/2010 11/30/2010 4/14/2011 6/16/2011 10/6/2011 1/19/2012 4/18/2012 7/26/2012 1/24/2013 9/26/2013 10/28/2013 CTLsPRO (ug/l)<130<130~~~~~~~~~5,000VOAsAcetone (ug/l)<8.9<16~~~~~~~~~6,300Benzene (ug/l)<0.29 <0.23 <0.13 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.19 <0.19 0.23 (E)1Ethylbenzene (ug/l)171.60.78 0.37 (E) 0.65<0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.16 <0.16 <0.1630Isopropylbenzene (ug/l)1.11.3~~~~~~~~~0.8Methylene Chloride (ug/l)<0.3 0.94 (E)~~~~~~~~~NL2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)2.5~~~~~~~~~~28Methyl-tert-butyl-ether (ug/l)1108758553448553338131720Naphthalene (ug/l)2.2<0.98~~~~~~~~~14n-Propylbenzene (ug/l)1.41.3~~~~~~~~~NLToluene (ug/l)<0.27 <0.32 1 (E)<0.3<0.3<0.3<0.3<0.3<0.18 1.3 (E) <0.1840Trichloroethene (ug/l)<0.37 0.43 (E)~~~~~~~~~*0.005Total Xylenes (ug/l)<0.86 <0.86 1.1 (E) <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.51 <0.51 <0.5120PAHsAcenaphthene (ug/l)0.0880.11~~~~~~~~~20Acenaphthylene (ug/l)0.037 0.063~~~~~~~~~210Fluorene (ug/l)0.050.061~~~~~~~~~2802-Chloronaphthalene (ug/l)<0.014 0.02 (E)~~~~~~~~~5601-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)1.50.64~~~~~~~~~282-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)0.11 0.079 (E)~~~~~~~~~28Naphthalene (ug/l)1.3 0.021 (E)~~~~~~~~~14Phenanthrene (ug/l)<0.018 <0.0069~~~~~~~~~210Notes:CTLs = Florida Groundwater Cleanup Target Levels - Groundwater criteria.< = Less than laboratory method detection limit (MDL).PRO = Petroleum Range Organics.VOA = Volitile Organic Analysis.PAH = Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons.Concentrations in bold and shaded at or above CTLs. ~ = Sample was not analyzed for this parameter.NL = Parameter is not listed in CTLs. E = Estimated value below lowest calibration point.* = National Primary Drinking Water Standard - Maximum Contaminant Level.SOUTH BAY MARINANAPLES, FLORIDAProject No. W10-0854409 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1193Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TABLE 3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2Sample Date 5/19/2010 11/30/2010 4/14/2011 6/16/2011 10/6/2011 1/19/2012 4/18/2012 7/26/2012 1/24/2013 9/26/2013 10/28/2013 CTLsPRO (ug/l)<130<130~~~~~~~~~5,000VOAsAcetone (ug/l)<8.9<16~~~~~~~~~6,300Benzene (ug/l)<0.29 <0.23 <0.13 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.19 <0.19 <0.191Ethylbenzene (ug/l)<0.22 <0.22 <0.21 <0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.16 <0.16 <0.1630Isopropylbenzene (ug/l)<0.19<0.2~~~~~~~~~0.8Methylene Chloride (ug/l)<0.3<0.91~~~~~~~~~NL2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)<0.43~~~~~~~~~~28Methyl-tert-butyl-ether (ug/l)201419192.9122420243.46.420Naphthalene (ug/l)<0.17 <0.98~~~~~~~~~14n-Propylbenzene (ug/l)<0.22 <0.31~~~~~~~~~NLToluene (ug/l)<0.27 <0.32 0.26 (E) <0.3 0.43 (E) <0.3<0.3<0.3<0.18 1.3 (E)8.640Trichloroethene (ug/l)<0.37 <0.31~~~~~~~~~*0.005Total Xylenes (ug/l)<0.86 <0.86 <0.43 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.51 <0.51 <0.5120PAHsAcenaphthene (ug/l)0.022 0.028 (E)~~~~~~~~~20Acenaphthylene (ug/l)0.022 0.021 (E)~~~~~~~~~210Fluorene (ug/l)0.013 <0.0048~~~~~~~~~2802-Chloronaphthalene (ug/l)<0.014 <0.0054~~~~~~~~~5601-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)<0.014 <0.0069~~~~~~~~~282-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)<0.014 <0.007~~~~~~~~~28Naphthalene (ug/l)0.039 <0.01~~~~~~~~~14Phenanthrene (ug/l)<0.018 0.01 (E)~~~~~~~~~210Notes:CTLs = Florida Groundwater Cleanup Target Levels - Groundwater criteria.< = Less than laboratory method detection limit (MDL).PRO = Petroleum Range Organics.VOA = Volitile Organic Analysis.PAH = Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons.Concentrations in bold and shaded at or above CTLs. ~ = Sample was not analyzed for this parameter.NL = Parameter is not listed in CTLs. E = Estimated value below lowest calibration point.* = National Primary Drinking Water Standard - Maximum Contaminant Level.SOUTH BAY MARINANAPLES, FLORIDAProject No. W10-0854410 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1194Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TABLE 3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3 MW-3Sample Date 5/19/2010 11/30/2010 4/14/2011 6/16/2011 10/6/2011 1/19/2012 4/18/2012 7/26/2012 1/24/2013 9/26/2013 10/28/2013 CTLsPRO (ug/l)<130<130~~~~~~~~~5,000VOAsAcetone (ug/l)12<16~~~~~~~~~6,300Benzene (ug/l)<0.29 <0.23 <0.13 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.19 <0.19 <0.191Ethylbenzene (ug/l)<0.22 <0.22 <0.21 <0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.16 <0.16 <0.1630Isopropylbenzene (ug/l)<0.19<0.2~~~~~~~~~0.8Methylene Chloride (ug/l)<0.3 1.5 (E)~~~~~~~~~NL2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)<0.43~~~~~~~~~~28Methyl-tert-butyl-ether (ug/l)401818267.917241932131220Naphthalene (ug/l)<0.17 <0.98~~~~~~~~~14n-Propylbenzene (ug/l)<0.22 <0.31~~~~~~~~~NLToluene<0.27 <0.32 0.56 (E) <0.3<0.3<0.3<0.3<0.56 <0.18 0.22 (E) <0.1840Trichloroethene (ug/l)<0.37 <0.31~~~~~~~~~*0.005Total Xylenes<0.86 <0.86 <0.43 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.51 <0.51 <0.5120PAHsAcenaphthene (ug/l)0.04 <0.014~~~~~~~~~20Acenaphthylene (ug/l)<0.017 <0.0095~~~~~~~~~210Fluorene (ug/l)0.012 <0.0048~~~~~~~~~2802-Chloronaphthalene (ug/l)<0.014 <0.0054~~~~~~~~~5601-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)0.06 0.011 (E)~~~~~~~~~282-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l)<0.014 <0.007~~~~~~~~~28Naphthalene (ug/l)0.03 0.012 (E)~~~~~~~~~14Phenanthrene (ug/l)<0.018 0.012 (E)~~~~~~~~~210Notes:CTLs = Florida Groundwater Cleanup Target Levels - Groundwater criteria.< = Less than laboratory method detection limit (MDL).PRO = Petroleum Range Organics.VOA = Volitile Organic Analysis.PAH = Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons.Concentrations in bold and shaded at or above CTLs.~ = Sample was not analyzed for this parameter.NL = Parameter is not listed in CTLs. E = Estimated value below lowest calibration point.* = National Primary Drinking Water Standard - Maximum Contaminant Level.SOUTH BAY MARINANAPLES, FLORIDAProject No. W10-0854411 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1195Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TABLE 3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS MW-4 MW-4 MW-5 MW-5Sample Date 5/19/2010 11/30/2010 5/19/2010 11/30/2010 CTLsPRO (ug/l)<130 <130 <130 <1305,000VOAsAcetone (ug/l) <8.9 <16 <8.9 <166,300Benzene (ug/l) <0.29 <0.23 <0.29 <0.231Ethylbenzene (ug/l) <0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.2230Isopropylbenzene (ug/l) <0.19 <0.2 <0.19 <0.20.8Methylene Chloride (ug/l) <0.3 1.6 (E) <0.3 1.5 (E)NL2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l) <0.43 ~ <0.43 ~28Methyl-tert-butyl-ether (ug/l) <0.19 <0.63 <0.19 <0.6320Naphthalene (ug/l) <0.17 <0.98 <0.17 <0.9814n-Propylbenzene (ug/l) <0.22 <0.31 <0.22 <0.31NLToluene <0.27 <0.32 <0.27 <0.3240Trichloroethene (ug/l) <0.37 <0.31 <0.37 <0.31*0.005Total Xylenes <0.86 <0.86 <0.86 <0.8620PAHsAcenaphthene (ug/l) <0.013 <0.014 <0.013 <0.01420Acenaphthylene (ug/l) <0.017 <0.0095 <0.017 <0.0095210Fluorene (ug/l) <0.012 <0.0048 <0.012 <0.00482802-Chloronaphthalene (ug/l) <0.014 <0.0054 <0.014 <0.00545601-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l) <0.014 <0.0069 <0.014 <0.0069282-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l) <0.014 <0.007 <0.014 <0.00728Naphthalene (ug/l) 0.028 0.012 (E) <0.023 <0.0114Phenanthrene (ug/l) <0.018 <0.0069 <0.018 <0.0069210Notes:CTLs = Florida Groundwater Cleanup Target Levels - Groundwater criteria.< = Less than laboratory method detection limit (MDL).PRO = Petroleum Range Organics.VOA = Volitile Organic Analysis.PAH = Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons.Concentrations in bold and shaded at or above CTLs.~ = Sample was not analyzed for this parameter.NL = Parameter is not listed in CTLs. E = Estimated value below lowest calibration point.* = National Primary Drinking Water Standard - Maximum Contaminant Level.SOUTH BAY MARINANAPLES, FLORIDAProject No. W10-0854412 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1196Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) FIGURES 413 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1197 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Site Location Map South Bay Marina Naples, Florida 34108 October 2011 Figure 1W10-0854 N S EW SITE 179 Southbay Drive 414 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1198 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) SITE MAP South Bay Marina 179 South Bay Drive Naples, Florida 34108 October 2011 MW-1 (4") MW-2 MW-5 MW-3 MW-4 Fence Supply Line 2K Gasoline UST Fuel Dispenser SITE = Monitoring Well 0'31' Scale: 1 Inch = 31 Feet LEGEND = Sewer line = Water line = Electric line = Communications line W10-0854 Figure 2 Surface Water Drainage 415 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1199 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 9596979899100Elevation (feet)DateFIGURE 3GROUNDWATER HYDROGRAPHSOUTH BAY MARINANAPLES FLORIDANOVA PROJECT NO. W10-0854MW-1MW-2MW-3MW-4MW-5416 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1200Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR MAP - Without MW-4 (10/28/13) South Bay Marina 179 South Bay Drive Naples, Florida 34108 October 2013 MW-1 (4") (96.26') MW-2 (96.12') MW-5 (96.21')MW-3 (96.21') MW-4 Fence Supply Line Fuel Dispenser SITE = Monitoring Well 0'31' Scale: 1 Inch = 31 Feet LEGEND = Sewer line = Water line = Electric line = Communications line W10-0854 Figure 4 Surface Water Drainage Groundwater Flow417 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1201 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 020406080100120May-10 Aug-10 Nov-10 Feb-11 May-11 Aug-11 Nov-11 Feb-12 May-12 Aug-12 Nov-12 Feb-13 May-13 Aug-13 Nov-13Micrograms-Per-Liter (ug/l)DateFIGURE 5MTBE CONCENTRATION TRENDSSOUTH BAY MARINANAPLES, FLORIDANOVA PROJECT NO. W10-0854MW-1MW-2MW-3418 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1202Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) APPENDIX A METHOLOLOGIES 419 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1203 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) METHODOLOGIES Groundwater Level Measurements Prior to collecting groundwater samples, the depth of the static water level in each monitoring well was measured using a Solinist water level indicator and was recorded to the nearest 0.01 foot. The water level indicator was cleaned before and after each measurement with isopropyl alcohol and distilled water. The depth to water within each well was recorded along with the time when the measurement was completed. Groundwater Sampling for Volatile Hydrocarbons (Monitoring Wells) The total volume of "standing" water in the monitoring well was calculated prior to collecting the groundwater sample. The depth to the groundwater surface was measured to the nearest 0.01 foot with a Solinst water level indicator and the total volume of water in the casing was calculated by the following relation (the volume per foot conversion for a 2-inch diameter well of 0.163 was used and 0.653 was used for 4-inch diameter well): Well volume = (total depth of well - depth to groundwater) x well volume conversion One casing volume of groundwater was removed utilizing a peristaltic pump and dedicated Teflon tubing prior to the collection of the first set of well measurements. Dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, conductivity, and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) was measured with an YSI Model 556 multi-meter and flow-through cell following the manufacturer's specifications. The stabilization criteria for range of variation of last three consecutive readings were as follows: dissolved oxygen less than or equal to 20% saturation (or +/- 10%); pH +/- 0.2 units; temperature +/- 0.2 degrees Celsius; and specific conductance +/- 5%. After the well was purged to stabilization (as confirmed with field measured well parameters), the groundwater samples were decanted into laboratory supplied containers, placed in a cooler (on ice) and shipped, under chain-of- custody protocol to a certified laboratory. 420 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1204 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) APPENDIX B LABORATORY CHEMICAL ANALYSIS REPORT 421 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1205 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Juliet, TN 37122 (615) 758-5858 1-800-767-5859 Fax (615) 758-5859 Tax I.D. 62-0814289 Est. 1970 Mike Hayes Nova Consulting Group 1107 Hazeltine Blvd, Ste 400 Chaska, MN 55318 Report Summary Monday November 04, 2013 Report Number: L665811 Samples Received: 10/30/13 Client Project: W10-0854 Description: Site Investigation The analytical results in this report are based upon information suppliedby you, the client, and are for your exclusive use. If you have anyquestions regarding this data package, please do not hesitate to call. Entire Report Reviewed By: ____________________________________ John Hawkins , ESC Representative Laboratory Certification Numbers A2LA - 1461-01, AIHA - 100789, AL - 40660, CA - 01157CA, CT - PH-0197,FL - E87487, GA - 923, IN - C-TN-01, KY - 90010, KYUST - 0016,NC - ENV375/DW21704/BIO041, ND - R-140. NJ - TN002, NJ NELAP - TN002,SC - 84004, TN - 2006, VA - 460132, WV - 233, AZ - 0612,MN - 047-999-395, NY - 11742, WI - 998093910, NV - TN000032011-1,TX - T104704245-11-3, OK - 9915, PA - 68-02979, IA Lab #364 Accreditation is only applicable to the test methods specified on each scope of accreditation held by ESC Lab Sciences. Note: The use of the preparatory EPA Method 3511 is not approved or endorsed by the CA ELAP. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from ESC Lab Sciences. Where applicable, sampling conducted by ESC is performed per guidance provided in laboratory standard operating procedures: 060302, 060303, and 060304. Page 1 of 8 422 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1206 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Juliet, TN 37122 (615) 758-5858 1-800-767-5859 Fax (615) 758-5859 Tax I.D. 62-0814289 Est. 1970 REPORT OF ANALYSIS Mike Hayes November 04, 2013 Nova Consulting Group 1107 Hazeltine Blvd, Ste 400 Chaska, MN 55318 ESC Sample # : L665811-01 Date Received : October 30, 2013 Description : Naples - South By Marina Site ID : Sample ID : MW-1 Project # : W10-0854 Collected By : MDH Collection Date : 10/28/13 18:00 Parameter Result MDL RDL Units Qualifier Method Prep Analyze Dil. Benzene 0.23 0.19 0.50 ug/l I 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 Toluene 0.18 0.18 5.0 ug/l U 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 Ethylbenzene 0.16 0.16 0.50 ug/l U 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 Total Xylene 0.51 0.51 1.5 ug/l U 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether 17. 0.34 1.0 ug/l 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 Surrogate Recovery(%) a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene(PID) 99.7 % Rec. 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 U = ND (Not Detected) RDL = Reported Detection Limit = LOQ = PQL = EQL = TRRP MQL MDL = Minimum Detection Limit = LOD = TRRP SDL Note: The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. . Reported: 11/04/13 16:01 Printed: 11/04/13 16:09 Page 2 of 8 423 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1207 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Juliet, TN 37122 (615) 758-5858 1-800-767-5859 Fax (615) 758-5859 Tax I.D. 62-0814289 Est. 1970 REPORT OF ANALYSIS Mike Hayes November 04, 2013 Nova Consulting Group 1107 Hazeltine Blvd, Ste 400 Chaska, MN 55318 ESC Sample # : L665811-02 Date Received : October 30, 2013 Description : Naples - South By Marina Site ID : Sample ID : MW-2 Project # : W10-0854 Collected By : MDH Collection Date : 10/28/13 18:41 Parameter Result MDL RDL Units Qualifier Method Prep Analyze Dil. Benzene 0.19 0.19 0.50 ug/l U 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 Toluene 8.6 0.18 5.0 ug/l 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 Ethylbenzene 0.16 0.16 0.50 ug/l U 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 Total Xylene 0.51 0.51 1.5 ug/l U 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether 6.4 0.34 1.0 ug/l 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 Surrogate Recovery(%) a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene(PID) 100. % Rec. 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 U = ND (Not Detected) RDL = Reported Detection Limit = LOQ = PQL = EQL = TRRP MQL MDL = Minimum Detection Limit = LOD = TRRP SDL Note: The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. . Reported: 11/04/13 16:01 Printed: 11/04/13 16:09 Page 3 of 8 424 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1208 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Juliet, TN 37122 (615) 758-5858 1-800-767-5859 Fax (615) 758-5859 Tax I.D. 62-0814289 Est. 1970 REPORT OF ANALYSIS Mike Hayes November 04, 2013 Nova Consulting Group 1107 Hazeltine Blvd, Ste 400 Chaska, MN 55318 ESC Sample # : L665811-03 Date Received : October 30, 2013 Description : Naples - South By Marina Site ID : Sample ID : MW-3 Project # : W10-0854 Collected By : MDH Collection Date : 10/28/13 19:12 Parameter Result MDL RDL Units Qualifier Method Prep Analyze Dil. Benzene 0.19 0.19 0.50 ug/l U 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 Toluene 0.18 0.18 5.0 ug/l U 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 Ethylbenzene 0.16 0.16 0.50 ug/l U 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 Total Xylene 0.51 0.51 1.5 ug/l U 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether 12. 0.34 1.0 ug/l 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 Surrogate Recovery(%) a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene(PID) 100. % Rec. 8021 11/01/13 11/02/13 1 U = ND (Not Detected) RDL = Reported Detection Limit = LOQ = PQL = EQL = TRRP MQL MDL = Minimum Detection Limit = LOD = TRRP SDL Note: The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC. . Reported: 11/04/13 16:01 Printed: 11/04/13 16:09 Page 4 of 8 425 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1209 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Attachment A List of Analytes with QC Qualifiers Sample Work Sample Run Number Group Type Analyte ID Qualifier ________________ ___________ _______ ________________________________________ __________ __________ L665811-01 WG690176 SAMP Benzene R2848641 I Page 5 of 8 426 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1210 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Attachment B Explanation of QC Qualifier Codes Qualifier Meaning __________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ I (EPA) - Estimated value below the lowest calibration point. Confidence correlates with concentration. Qualifier Report Information ESC utilizes sample and result qualifiers as set forth by the EPA Contract Laboratory Program and as required by most certifying bodies including NELAC. In addition to the EPA qualifiers adopted by ESC, we have implemented ESC qualifiers to provide more information pertaining to our analytical results. Each qualifier is designated in the qualifier explanation as either EPA or ESC. Data qualifiers are intended to provide the ESC client with more detailed information concerning the potential bias of reported data. Because of the wide range of constituents and variety of matrices incorporated by most EPA methods,it is common for some compounds to fall outside of established ranges. These exceptions are evaluated and all reported data is valid and useable "unless qualified as 'R' (Rejected)." Definitions Accuracy - The relationship of the observed value of a known sample to the true value of a known sample. Represented by percent recovery and relevant to samples such as: control samples, matrix spike recoveries, surrogate recoveries, etc. Precision - The agreement between a set of samples or between duplicate samples. Relates to how close together the results are and is represented by Relative Percent Differrence. Surrogate - Organic compounds that are similar in chemical composition, extraction, and chromotography to analytes of interest. The surrogates are used to determine the probable response of the group of analytes that are chem- ically related to the surrogate compound. Surrogates are added to the sample and carried through all stages of preparation and analyses. TIC - Tentatively Identified Compound: Compounds detected in samples that are not target compounds, internal standards, system monitoring compounds, or surrogates. Page 6 of 8 427 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1211 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Juliet, TN 37122 (615) 758-5858 1-800-767-5859 Fax (615) 758-5859 Tax I.D. 62-0814289 Est. 1970 Nova Consulting Group Mike Hayes 1107 Hazeltine Blvd, Ste 400 Quality Assurance Report Level II Chaska, MN 55318 November 04, 2013 L665811 Laboratory Blank Analyte Result Units % Rec Limit Batch Date Analyzed Benzene < .0005 mg/l WG690176 11/02/13 00:28 Ethylbenzene < .0005 mg/l WG690176 11/02/13 00:28 Methyl tert-butyl ether < .005 mg/l WG690176 11/02/13 00:28 Toluene < .005 mg/l WG690176 11/02/13 00:28 Total Xylene < .0015 mg/l WG690176 11/02/13 00:28 a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene(PID) % Rec. 101.0 55-122 WG690176 11/02/13 00:28 Laboratory Control Sample Analyte Units Known Val Result % Rec Limit Batch Benzene mg/l .05 0.0431 86.3 70-130 WG690176 Ethylbenzene mg/l .05 0.0449 89.8 70-130 WG690176 Methyl tert-butyl ether mg/l .05 0.0465 93.1 70-130 WG690176 Toluene mg/l .05 0.0444 88.8 70-130 WG690176 Total Xylene mg/l .15 0.143 95.2 70-130 WG690176 a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene(PID) 101.0 55-122 WG690176 Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate Analyte Units Result Ref %Rec Limit RPD Limit Batch Benzene mg/l 0.0433 0.0431 86.0 70-130 0.290 20 WG690176 Ethylbenzene mg/l 0.0449 0.0449 90.0 70-130 0.0600 20 WG690176 Methyl tert-butyl ether mg/l 0.0465 0.0465 93.0 70-130 0.140 20 WG690176 Toluene mg/l 0.0444 0.0444 89.0 70-130 0.0300 20 WG690176 Total Xylene mg/l 0.143 0.143 95.0 70-130 0.0800 20 WG690176 a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene(PID) 99.90 55-122 WG690176 Matrix Spike Analyte Units MS Res Ref Res TV % Rec Limit Ref Samp Batch Benzene mg/l 0.0430 0.0000535 .05 86.0 57.2-131 L666031-11 WG690176 Ethylbenzene mg/l 0.0444 0.0000213 .05 89.0 67.5-135 L666031-11 WG690176 Methyl tert-butyl ether mg/l 0.0469 0.0000127 .05 94.0 52.4-137 L666031-11 WG690176 Toluene mg/l 0.0441 0.0000483 .05 88.0 63.7-134 L666031-11 WG690176 Total Xylene mg/l 0.141 0.000139 .15 94.0 65.9-138 L666031-11 WG690176 a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene(PID) 99.20 55-122 WG690176 Matrix Spike Duplicate Analyte Units MSD Ref %Rec Limit RPD Limit Ref Samp Batch Benzene mg/l 0.0411 0.0430 82.0 57.2-131 4.60 20 L666031-11 WG690176 Ethylbenzene mg/l 0.0423 0.0444 84.6 67.5-135 4.71 20 L666031-11 WG690176 Methyl tert-butyl ether mg/l 0.0440 0.0469 88.0 52.4-137 6.41 20 L666031-11 WG690176 Toluene mg/l 0.0420 0.0441 83.9 63.7-134 4.87 20 L666031-11 WG690176 Total Xylene mg/l 0.135 0.141 89.8 65.9-138 4.45 20 L666031-11 WG690176 a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene(PID) 99.30 55-122 WG690176 Batch number /Run number / Sample number cross reference WG690176: R2848641: L665811-01 02 03 * * Calculations are performed prior to rounding of reported values. * Performance of this Analyte is outside of established criteria. For additional information, please see Attachment A 'List of Analytes with QC Qualifiers.' Page 7 of 8 428 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1212 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 12065 Lebanon Rd. Mt. Juliet, TN 37122 (615) 758-5858 1-800-767-5859 Fax (615) 758-5859 Tax I.D. 62-0814289 Est. 1970 Nova Consulting Group Mike Hayes 1107 Hazeltine Blvd, Ste 400 Quality Assurance Report Level II Chaska, MN 55318 November 04, 2013 L665811 The data package includes a summary of the analytic results of the quality control samples required by the SW-846 or CWA methods. The quality control samples include a method blank, a laboratory control sample, and the matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate analysis. If a target parameter is outside the method limits, every sample that is effected is flagged with the appropriate qualifier in Appendix B of the analytic report. Method Blank - an aliquot of reagent water carried through the entire analytic process. The method blank results indicate if any possible contamination exposure during the sample handling, digestion or extraction process, and analysis. Concentrations of target analytes above the reporting limit in the method blank are qualified with the "B" qualifier. Laboratory Control Sample - is a sample of known concentration that is carried through the digestion/extraction and analysis process. The percent recovery, expressed as a percentage of the theoretical concentration, has statistical control limits indicating that the analytic process is "in control". If a target analyte is outside the control limits for the laboratory control sample or any other control sample, the parameter is flagged with a "J4" qualifier for all effected samples. Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate - is two aliquots of an environmental sample that is spiked with known concentrations of target analytes. The percent recovery of the target analytes also has statistical control limits. If any recoveries that are outside the method control limits, the sample that was selected for matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate analysis is flagged with either a "J5" or a "J6". The relative percent difference (%RPD) between the matrix spike and the matrix spike duplicate recoveries is all calculated. If the RPD is above the method limit, the effected samples are flagged with a "J3" qualifier. Page 8 of 8 429 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1213 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 430 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1214 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) APPENDIX C FIELD SAMPLING SHEETS 431 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1215 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 432 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1216 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 433 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1217 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 434 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1218 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 435 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1219 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 436 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1220 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 437 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1221 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 438 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1222 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 439 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1223 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 440 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1224 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 441 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1225 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 442 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1226 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 443 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1227 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 444 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1228 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 445 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1229 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 446 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1230 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 447 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1231 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 448 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1232 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 449 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1233 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 450 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1234 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 451 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1235 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 452 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1236Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 453 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1237 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 454 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1238Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 455 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1239 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 456 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1240 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 457 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1241 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 458 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1242 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 459 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1243 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 460 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1244 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 461 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1245 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 462 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1246 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 463 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1247 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 464 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1248 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 465 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1249 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 466 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1250 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) APPENDIX E HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS, SANBORN MAPS and CITY DIRECTORIES 467 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1251 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Vanderbilt Property 155 Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, FL 34108 May 27, 2016 4630846.5 468 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1252 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Contact:EDR Inquiry # Search Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Year Details SourceScale EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Site Name: Client Name: 2010 1"=500'Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2007 1"=500'Flight Year: 2007 USDA/NAIP 2006 1"=500'Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP 1999 1"=500'Acquisition Date: January, 06 1999 USGS/DOQQ 1993 1"=500'Flight Date: November, 02 1993 FLDOT 1985 1"=500'Flight Date: February, 14 1985 FLDOT 1973 1"=500'Flight Date: January, 31 1973 FLDOT 1971 1"=500'Flight Date: February, 15 1971 USGS 1968 1"=500'Flight Date: March, 05 1968 FLDOT 1962 1"=500'Flight Date: January, 01 1962 U of FL 1951 1"=500'Flight Date: May, 01 1951 USGS 05/27/16 Vanderbilt Property American Compliance Tech., Inc 155 Vanderbilt Beach Road 1875 West Main Street Naples, FL 34108 Bartow, FL 33830 4630846.5 M This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 4630846 5 2 469 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1253 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4630846.5 2010 = 500'470 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1254 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4630846.5 2007 = 500'471 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1255 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4630846.5 2006 = 500'472 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1256 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4630846.5 1999 = 500'473 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1257 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4630846.5 1993 = 500'474 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1258 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4630846.5 1985 = 500'475 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1259 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4630846.5 1973 = 500'476 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1260 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4630846.5 1971 = 500'477 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1261 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4630846.5 1968 = 500'478 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1262 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4630846.5 1962 = 500'479 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1263 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 4630846.5 1951 = 500'480 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1264 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Vanderbilt Property 155 Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, FL 34108 Inquiry Number: 4630846.8 May 31, 2016 The EDR-City Directory Image Report 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc 481 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1265 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 482 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1266 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year Target Street Cross Street Source 2013 Cole Information Services 2008 Cole Information Services 2003 Cole Information Services 1999 Cole Information Services 1995 Cole Information Services 1992 Cole Information Services 1989 Polk's City Directory 1985 Polk's City Directory 1980 Polk's City Directory 1975 Polk's City Directory 1970 Polk's City Directory 1967 Polk's City Directory 1964 Polk's City Directory RECORD SOURCES EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. 4630846-8 Page 1 483 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1267 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY STREET 155 Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, FL 34108 Year CD Image Source VANDERBILT BEACH RD 2013 pg A2 Cole Information Services 2008 pg A4 Cole Information Services 2003 pg A6 Cole Information Services 1999 pg A8 Cole Information Services 1995 pg A10 Cole Information Services 1992 pg A12 Cole Information Services 1989 pg A14 Polk's City Directory 1989 pg A15 Polk's City Directory 1985 pg A18 Polk's City Directory 1985 pg A19 Polk's City Directory 1980 -Polk's City Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1975 -Polk's City Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1970 -Polk's City Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1967 -Polk's City Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1964 -Polk's City Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 4630846-8 Page 2 484 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1268 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) FINDINGS CROSS STREETS Year CD Image Source GULF SHORE DR 2013 pg. A1 Cole Information Services 2008 pg. A3 Cole Information Services GULFSHORE DR 2003 pg. A5 Cole Information Services 1999 pg. A7 Cole Information Services 1995 pg. A9 Cole Information Services 1992 pg. A11 Cole Information Services 1989 pg. A13 Polk's City Directory 1985 pg. A16 Polk's City Directory 1985 pg. A17 Polk's City Directory 1980 -Polk's City Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1975 -Polk's City Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1970 -Polk's City Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1967 -Polk's City Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1964 -Polk's City Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 4630846-8 Page 3 485 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1269 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) City Directory Images 486 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1270 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - GULF SHORE DR Cole Information Services 4630846.8 Page: A1 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2013 9000 MARI VESCI REALTORS INC 9002 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 9010 QUINN BOARDS 9012 ALEXANDRIA WHALEN 9020 PALM BEACH PIZZERIA PARADISO OF NAPLES LLC 9022 BELLE HUNIU 9032 DARLENE SPARS 9051 ARTHUR BOTH ARTHUR FITZGERALD BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOC DANIEL MCGUIRE DAVID GALLOWAY DAVID SNOWDEN DAVID TREADWELL DOUG ODELL GREGORY BROWN JOHN DONLEY RANDALL PASCUT ROBERT GUNN ROBERT VEZZA RODNEY JONES THOMAS SHEEHAN TOMAS ESTEVE WAYNE LUCIER WILLIAM DOTY 9060 SOUTHBAY REALTY RENTALS 9136 SOUTHBAY REALTY 9140 LIGHTHOUSE PROPERTIES 9155 ALEX NEUBRONNER ANDREW MASKERY DAVID GIBBONS FRANK MYERS GERARD CAFESJIAN JERRY CHAMBLEE PHOENICIAN SANDS CONDO WILLIAM DIEHL 9180 LIGHTHOUSE RESTAURANT 487 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1271 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - VANDERBILT BEACH RD Cole Information Services 4630846.8 Page: A2 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2013 155 ACH STORE 280 ANDARA SMILE SPA HERTZ SPA AT THE RITZCARLTON NAPLES THE RITZCARLTON NAPLES RESERVATIO THE RITZCARLTON NAPLES RESORT 325 PREMIER PROPERTIES PREMIER PROPERTIES OF SOUTHWEST 377 TUCKER COON WILLIAM ANDERSON 488 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1272 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - GULF SHORE DR Cole Information Services 4630846.8 Page: A3 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2008 9000 GRS MERCHANDISE SERVICES LLC MARI VESCI REALTORS INC 9002 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 9010 AGUAZUL SALES CENTER SOUTH BAY LAND DEVELOPMENT 9020 DIPPER DEL OF NAPLES GOLFVIEW DIPPER DEL PALM BEACH CAFE 9022 SEBASTIAN PAGUNI 9030 WILL O WISP 9051 ANN NEWTON ARLIN PARKER ARTHUR BOTH BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION IN D MCGUIRE DAVID SNOWDEN DIVIN USA INC EDWARD DIPPLE JANA HAZELBAKER JOHN DONLEY JOHN MILLER L BRUBAKER LYDIA PASCUT RAFIK AYOUB RAYMOND CARYE ROBERT GUNN ROBERT VEZZA ROLLIN RHEA ROY BROWN STEVEN TARTA THOMAS SHEEHAN TIMOTHY ROGERS TRIANGLE TALENT INC WILLIAM LUCIER 9060 RESORT QUEST VACATION HOME NETWORK 9115 CAROLYN BELDEN 9136 SOUTHBAY REALTY WEGMANS FOOD MARKET 9140 LIGHTHOUSE INN 9155 DAN HOLLAND DAVID GIBBONS NATURES WAY LANDSCAPES NPLES LLC PHOENICIAN SANDS CONDO ROY WILLIAMSON W LINDSAY 9180 BUZZS LIGHTHOUSE LLC BUZZS LIGHTHOUSE RESTAURANT 489 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1273 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - VANDERBILT BEACH RD Cole Information Services 4630846.8 Page: A4 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2008 155 CIRCLE K STORES INC THE BEACH STORE 280 ANDARA SMILE SPA FLORIDA LL HERTZ RENT A CAR HOST HOTELS & RESORTS L P HOST MARRIOTT LP PRUDENTIAL FLORIDA WCI REALTY RITZ CARLETON HOTEL RITZ CARLTON NAPLES RITZ CARLTON SPA & SALON YAMRON JEWELERS 325 CHESTERTON INTERNATIONAL INC 333 LESLIE REIFF DVM 377 EMILIE HELLER KEVIN HALESWORTH 490 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1274 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - GULFSHORE DR Cole Information Services 4630846.8 Page: A5 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2003 9000 MY CONDO MANAGEMENT LLC ROLF BOEGLI 9002 BRUCE ARNOLD 9010 PINK PELICAN 9012 R RUBECK 9020 DIPPER D GOLFVIEW RALPH HINTON 9022 RON RUBECK 9030 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN WILL A THE WISP 9032 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 9051 ALFRED TRIBBY ARTHUR BOTH BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM ASCTN D MCGUIRE DAVID PASCUT DAVID SNOWDEN DOUG ODELL E HESS E NIESEN EDWARD DIPPLE GRACE PALESCANDOLO HARVEY CAMPBELL JACK GIBSON JAMES SAMPSON JANA HAZELBAKER JEANNE KLUENER JOHN COX JOHN DONLEY L BRUBAKER LORNE PALMASON PHILIP BRUMBACH R BROWN RAFIK AYOUB ROBERT GUNN ROBERT JONES RONALD KAMINSKI STEPHEN ROGERS STEVEN TARTA T FITZGERALD WILLIAM LUCIER 9060 BLUEBILL PROPERTIES INC BLUEBILL VACATION RENTALS OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 9115 CAROLYN BELDEN 491 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1275 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - VANDERBILT BEACH RD Cole Information Services 4630846.8 Page: A6 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2003 155 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 280 BRADLEY CANCE ERIK JANSEN GRANT DIPMAN HERTZ RENT A CAR J & S AUDIO VISUALS RITZ CARLTON FLORISTS RITZ CARLTON TRANSPORTATION THOMAS STROBERGER WCI REALTY INC YAMRON JEWELERS 325 PREMIER PROPERTIES PREMIER PRPRTY OF STHWST FLRD 492 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1276 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - GULFSHORE DR Cole Information Services 4630846.8 Page: A7 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1999 9000 PAULA OYARZUN 9002 K RUBECK 9010 VANDERBILT SUNDRIES 9012 R RUBECK 9020 GULFVIEW DIPPER DEL OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 9022 RON RUBECK 9030 WILL A THE WISP 9032 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 9051 BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATES CHARLES COCOTAS D MCGUIRE DAVID SNOWDEN E NIESEN EDWARD DIPPLE GEORGE PASCUT HARVEY CAMPBELL JACK GIBSON JOHN COX JOHN DONLEY JON HAKELBAKER L BRUBAKER L HAZELBAKER LORNE PALMASON MICHAEL PALESCANDOLO PHILIP BRUMBACH R BROWN RAFIK AYOUB RALPH HAZELBAKER ROBERT GUNN ROBERT JONES RONALD KAMINSKI STEPHEN ROGERS STEVEN TARTA T FITZGERALD VINCENT MCKOUEN WALTER GROTE WILLIAM LUCIER 9060 BLUEBILL PROPERTIES INCORPORATED REAL ESTATE SALES 493 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1277 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - VANDERBILT BEACH RD Cole Information Services 4630846.8 Page: A8 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1999 280 HERTZ RENT A CAR NAPLES J & S AUDIO VISUALS PELICAN BAY PELICAN BAY WCI REALTY INCORPORATED PEREZ IGLESIAS RITZ CARLTON NAPLES ROBERT OF PHILADELPHIA THE RITZ CARLTON YAMRON JEWELERS 325 CHESTERTON INTERNATIONAL PORT MARY FRANCES PREM PROPERTIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INCORPORATED NORTH OFF 494 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1278 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - GULFSHORE DR Cole Information Services 4630846.8 Page: A9 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 9000 PHASE III REAL ESTATE SVC 9002 LAWLESS, TIM 9010 VANDERBILT SUNDRIES 9012 LAWLESS, TIM D 9020 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 9022 MOSHER, D M 9030 WILL A THE WISP 9032 LEVINE, ROBERT 9051 BEACHMOOR CONDOMINIUM BOTH, ARTHUR BROWN, R H BRUBAKER, L F BRUMBACH, PHILIP CAMPBELL, HARVEY F COOPER, HARRIS COX, JOHN M DAVIS, JULIAN C DIPPLE, EDWARD A DONLEY, JOHN E ENZ, LEE A FITZGERALD, T A GILLETTE, NORMAN L GROTE, WALTER F JR GUNN, ROBERT HAZELBAKER, RALPH E HENSLEY, CLYDE HOWE, EDWARD D JONES, ROBERT R KLUENER, ALBERT KUETTNER, WALTER LILE, K MAYO, ALLEN MCGUIRE, D MCKOUEN, VINCENT W MITCHELL, WARREN NIESEN, E H PALMASON, LORNE V PARKER, ARLEN PASCUT, GEORGE PATTEE, C PERRINO, FRANK TARTA, STEVEN W 9060 BLUEBILL PROPERTIES INC 495 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1279 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - VANDERBILT BEACH RD Cole Information Services 4630846.8 Page: A10 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 280 HERTZ RENT A CAR LYDON TRANSPORTATION REYES, DESIREE RITZ CARLTON NAPLES ROBERT OF PHILADELPHIA 337 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 377 COURTNEY REAL ESTATE DERRYBERRY, DELLA L DUFRESNE, ROGER KILBANE, F KOMMNICK, KLAUS MARKEY, R MCCLAIN, DORIS A MORELLO, CLAIR NAPLES RESORT PROPERTIES OTTO, ELKE RIOLA, JOHN ROY, ANNA SERGER, CARL J STUCHLAK, B THATCHER, HOWARD E WALKER, ROBERT 496 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1280 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - GULFSHORE DR Cole Information Services 4630846.8 Page: A11 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1992 9000 PHASE 3 REAL ESTATE 9002 LAWLESS, TIM 9010 VANDERBILT SUNDRIES 9012 LAWLESS, TIM D 9020 GULFVIEW DIPPER DEL 9022 MOSHER, D M 9030 WILL-A-THE WISP 9032 LEVINE, ROBERT 9051 BEACHMR CONDMN ASSC BROWN, R H ENZ, LEE A GROTE, WALTER F JR HAYES, HAROLD HENSLEY, CLYDE MCKOUEN, VINCENT W MCLAUGHLIN, GERARD R MUELLER, R J MUELLER, THOMAS SHEINFELD, ALAN L TARTA, STEVEN W 9060 BLUEBILL PROPERTIES 497 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1281 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - VANDERBILT BEACH RD Cole Information Services 4630846.8 Page: A12 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1992 0 LIGHTHOUSE INN 280 HERTZ RENT A CAR LYDON TRANSPORTATN RITZ CARLTON NAPLES 337 RAMUNDO, LUIS 377 COURTNEY REAL EST MARKEY, R PAULICH, JOHN 498 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1282 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - GULFSHORE DR Polk's City Directory 4630846.8 Page: A13 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1989 499 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1283 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - VANDERBILT BEACH RD Polk's City Directory 4630846.8 Page: A14 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1989 500 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1284 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - VANDERBILT BEACH RD Polk's City Directory 4630846.8 Page: A15 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1989 501 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1285 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - GULFSHORE DR Polk's City Directory 4630846.8 Page: A16 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1985 502 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1286 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - GULFSHORE DR Polk's City Directory 4630846.8 Page: A17 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1985 503 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1287 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - VANDERBILT BEACH RD Polk's City Directory 4630846.8 Page: A18 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1985 504 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1288 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) - VANDERBILT BEACH RD Polk's City Directory 4630846.8 Page: A19 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1985 505 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1289 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Certified Sanborn® Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Vanderbilt Property 155 Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, FL 34108 May 26, 2016 4630846.3 506 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1290 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Certification # Contact:EDR Inquiry # Site Name: Client Name: PO # Project 05/26/16 Vanderbilt Property American Compliance Tech., Inc 155 Vanderbilt Beach Road 1875 West Main Street Naples, FL 34108 Bartow, FL 33830 4630846.3 M The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by American Compliance Tech., Inc were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 8CE3-47B5-AD4E 17233-001 17233 UNMAPPED PROPERTY This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Certification #: 8CE3-47B5-AD4E American Compliance Tech., Inc (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 4630846 3 2 507 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1291 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) APPENDIX F PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION 508 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1292 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -1- View looking north at the signage for the South Bay Marina located on the northwest portion of the site. View looking northwest at the UST located on the northeast side of the South Bay Marina building. 509 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1293 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -2- View looking northeast at the South Bay Marina sales office building. View looking north at the former restaurant/bar building, associated with the South Bay Marina located on the northwest portion of the site. 510 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1294 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -3- View looking north at the boat dock associated with the South Bay Marina. The dock area is to the north of the marina sales office building. View looking north of the fuel dispenser located on the north end of the South Bay Marina dock. 511 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1295 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -4- View looking south at the South Bay Marina sales office building and the former restaurant/b ar building. View looking southeast at the fuel transfer line along the seawall associated with the South Bay Marina, UST and fuel dispenser system. 512 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1296 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -5- View of the interior within South Bay Marina sales office. View looking southeast at the grease trap/sanitary sewer manholes associated with the former restaurant/bar located at the South Bay Marina. 513 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1297 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -6- View of pad-mounted transformers located to the south of the South Bay Marina buildings . View of pole-mounted transformers located to the south of the South Bay Marina buildings. 514 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1298 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -7- View of the interior of the former restaurant/bar previously associated with the South Bay Marina . View of the interior of the former restaurant/bar previously associated with the South Bay Marina. 515 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1299 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -8- View looking north at the residential apartments located to the east of the South Bay Marina, on the northwest portion of the site. View of the residential dwelling located on the central portion of the site. 516 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1300 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -9- View looking south at a parking lot located on the west-central portion of the site. View looking northwest at the convenience store located on the southwest portion of the site. 517 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1301 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -10- View looking west-southwest at the northeast side of the convenience store building located on the southwest portion of the site. Interior of the convenience store located on the southwest portion of the site. 518 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1302 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -11- View looking northeast at vacant lots located on the central portion of the site on Central Drive. View looking north at a parking lot located on the west-central portion of the site. 519 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1303 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -12- View looking southwest at vacant lots located on the western portion of the site and Gulfshore Dr . View looking south at a vacant lot (former residence)located on the central portion of the site. 520 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1304 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -13- View looking southeast at a vacant lot located on the central portion of the site. View looking north at a vacant lot (former residential building) located on the north -central portion of the site. 521 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1305 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -14- View of a condominium building located on the east-central portion of the site. Signage for the condominium building located on the east-central portion of the site. 522 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1306 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -15- View looking north at a residential building located on the northeastern portion of the site. View looking west at the east side of the condominium building located on the east-central portion of the site. 523 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1307 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -16- View of the elevator certificate for the elevator associated with the condominium located on the east- central portion of the site. View looking west at the vacant lots located on the central portion of the site. 524 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1308 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -17- View looking west at vacant lots located on the central portion of the site. View looking east at vacant lots located of the southern portion of the site. 525 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1309 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -18- View looking west at a parking lot located on the southeastern portion of the site. View looking west at a utility storage are located on the southern portion of the site. 526 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1310 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -19- View looking southeast at the electrical transformers observed stored on the southern portion of the site (Utility Storage Area). View looking north at the hotel (Lighthouse Inn), located adjoining to the west-northwest of the site. 527 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1311 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -20- View of a condominium building located adjoining to the west of the western portion of the site. View of a condominium building located adjoining to the northwest of the western portion of the site. 528 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1312 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -21- View of a condominium building located adjoining to the northwest of the northwest portion of the site. View looking east at the adjoining property located to the west of the southwest portion of the site. 529 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1313 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -22- View looking south at the Ritz Carlton property located adjoining to the south of the site. View looking south at the entrance to the Ritz Carlton property located adjoining to the south of the site. 530 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1314 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -23- View looking south at the parking garage located adjoining to the south of the site. View looking northwest at the adjoining restaurant located within the central portion of the site area. 531 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1315 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) -24- View looking northeast at the condominium located adjoining to the east-northeast of the site area. View looking east at the real estate sales office building located adjoining to the east of the southeast portion of the site. 532 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1316 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 533 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1317Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 534 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1318Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 535 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1319Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 536 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1320Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 537 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1321Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 538 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1322Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 539 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1323Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 540 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1324Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 541 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1325Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 542 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1326Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 543 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1327Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 544 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1328Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 545 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1329Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 546 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1330Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 547 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1331Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 548 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1332 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 549 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1333Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 550 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1334Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 551 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1335Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 552 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1336Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 553 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1337Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 554 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1338Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 555 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1339 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 556 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1340Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 557 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1341Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 558 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1342Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 559 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1343Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 560 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1344Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 561 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1345 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 562 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1346 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 563 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1347Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 564 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1348Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 565 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1349Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 566 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1350Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 567 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1351Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 568 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1352Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 569 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1353Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 570 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1354Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 571 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1355Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 572 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1356Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 573 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1357Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 574 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1358Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 575 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1359Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 576 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1360Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 577 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1361Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 578 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1362Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 579 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1363Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 580 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1364Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 581 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1365Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 582 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1366Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 583 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1367Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 584 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1368Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 585 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1369Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 586 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1370Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 587 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1371Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 588 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1372Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 589 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1373Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 590 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1374Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 591 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1375Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 592 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1376Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 593 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1377Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 594 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1378Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 595 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1379Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 596 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1380Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 597 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1381Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 598 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1382Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 599 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1383Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 600 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1384Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 601 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1385Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 602 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1386Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 603 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1387Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 604 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1388Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 605 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1389Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 606 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1390Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 607 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1391Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 608 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1392Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 609 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1393Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 610 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1394Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 611 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1395Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 612 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1396Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 613 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1397Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 614 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1398Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 615 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1399Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 616 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1400Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 617 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1401Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 618 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1402Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 619 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1403Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 620 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1404Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 621 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1405Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 622 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1406Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 623 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1407Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 624 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1408 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 625 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1409 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 626 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1410 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 627 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1411 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 628 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1412 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 629 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1413 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 630 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1414 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 631 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1415 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 632 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1416 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 633 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1417 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 634 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1418 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 635 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1419 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 636 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1420 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 637 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1421 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 638 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1422 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 639 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1423 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 640 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1424 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) ONE NAPLES MPUD NIM DOCUMENTS 641 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1425 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 642 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1426Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 643 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1427Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 644 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1428Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 645 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1429Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 646 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1430 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 647 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1431 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 648 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1432 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 649 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1433 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 650 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1434 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 651 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1435 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 652 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1436 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 653 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1437 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 654 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1438 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 655 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1439 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 656 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1440 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 657 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1441 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 658 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1442 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 659 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1443 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 660 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1444 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 661 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1445 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 662 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1446 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 663 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1447 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 664 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1448 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 665 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1449 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 666 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1450 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 667 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1451 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 668 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1452 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 669 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1453 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 670 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1454 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 671 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1455 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 672 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1456Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 673 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1457Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 674 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1458Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 675 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1459Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 676 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1460Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 677 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1461Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 678 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1462Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 679 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1463Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 680 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1464Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 681 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1465Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 682 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1466Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 683 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1467Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 684 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1468Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 685 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1469Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 686 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1470Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 687 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1471Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 688 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1472Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 689 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1473Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 690 of 6969.A.2.wPacket Pg. 1474Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 691 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1475 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 692 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1476 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 693 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1477 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 694 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1478 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 695 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1479 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 696 of 696 9.A.2.w Packet Pg. 1480 Attachment: Backup Materials One Naples MPUD (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) NIMSUMMARY One Naples MPUD (PUDZ -PL20190000697) Vanderbilt Beach Mixed Use Subdistrict (SSGMPA - PL20190000696) Tuesday, March 3, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. Saint John the Evangelist Catholic Church, The Ballroom 625 l1lth Avenue North, Naples, FL 34108 The NIM was held for the above referenced petition. The petitions are described as follows: l) Petition SSGMPA-PL-20190000696 - This Amendment seeks to establish the Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict allowing following:o A maximum of 240 multi-family residential dwelling units and/or hotel rooms/suites with a minimum of 40 residential units is required as part of the initial Site Development Plan (SDP);o A maximum of25,000 square feet ofthe following uses, as permitted under the C-3 zoning district is allowed: o Retail o R€staurant o Personal Services o Professional and Medical Offices. A private ma.rina with up to 99 slips, limited to use by residents and guests only; and. A ship's store with marine fueling facility which may be open to the boating public. 2) Petition PUDZ-P[-20190000697 - The companion One Naples MPUD requests the uses listed above, establishes development standards for the subject site, and provides for a maximum PM Peak Hour Trip cap. Note: This is a summary of the ItlIM. An audio recording is also provided, Attendees: On behalf of Applicants: Brian Stock, CEO, Stock Development Keith Gelder, Vice President ofLand, Stock Development Chris Johnson, Director ofLand Development, Stock Development Claudine Leger-Wetzel, Vice President of Sales and Marketing, Stock Development Robert Hall, AIA, President, CGHJ Architects Christopher Mitchel, PE, Vice President of Operations, JRE Engineering James Banks, PE, President, JMB Transportation Richard Yovanovich, Esq., Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, PA Robert Mulhere, FAICP, President, Hole Montes Hunter Booth, President, Booth Design Group Tina McCain Matte, Gravina, Smith Matte & Amold County Staff: James French, Deputy Deparhnent Head, Growth Management Department Ray Bellows, AICP, Zoning Manager, Zoning Services Section James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section Approximately 450 members of the public attended 9.A.2.x Packet Pg. 1481 Attachment: NIM Summary One Naples001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Mr. Mulhere started the presentation by introducing himself, the other consultants, and County Staff He explained the NIM process, process for approval, and provided an estimated project timeline. Mr. Stock provided a brief history of Stock Development, Stock Developments support of local charitable organizations, and an overview ofexisting Stock Development residential communities. Mr. Gelder provided an overview ofthe project and the history ofthe site. Mr. Gelder went on to explain the existing C-3 zoning and its permitted uses. He explained the proposed improyements to the surrounding area, specifically landscaping adjacent to South Bay Drive, Gulf Shore Drive, and Vanderbilt Beach Drive; sidewalks, improved street lighting, and bike lanes along the both sides of Southbay Drive; a sidewalk and street lighting along the portion of Gulf Shore Drive adjacent to the property; public art on the properfy, and then provided an overview of the marina portion of the project. Mr. Banks went to explain that the project team is curently working with Collier County on potential upgrades to the public Vanderbilt Beach Parking Garage to help alleviate haffic on Vanderbilt Drive. These upgrades may include technology that keeps track of available parking, which then broadcasts that information to additional signage along Vanderbilt Beach Road; and operational improvements such as setting up an automated payment booth to allow us€rs to pay when exiting the garage. Mr. Banks then explained the Traffic Impact Statement (TIS), including the fact that under the existing C-3 zoning the property can support at least I 00,000 square feet of a mix of various C-3 uses, including retail, office and restaurant uses./ This would generate approximately 491 PM peak hour trips. Under the proposed MPUD zoning and resulting development scenario of240 residential dwelling units and 25,000 square feet ofretail uses, approximately 275 PM peak hour hips are generated. Mr. Banks then provided a brief summary of the TIS methodology and how trips are calculated. Mr. Gelder again provided the timeline for zoning approval and the construction timeline Following the presentation Mr. Yovanovich led Q & A form the public. This lasted approximately two hours and included feedback from the public, most of which was general commentary on and various reasons for opposing the project. The comments and questions centered on traffic (and related impacts), density, building height, setbacks, and marina design/permitting. A copy of the NIM PowerPoint presentation is included with this summary The meeting concluded at approximately 8:15 PM. 9.A.2.x Packet Pg. 1482 Attachment: NIM Summary One Naples001 (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 2320 First Street, Suite 1000 Fort Myers, FL 33901 Direct Dial 239.338.4213 PHONE 239.337.3850 FAX 239.337.0970 sspector@ralaw.com WWW.RALAW.COM September 21, 2020 VIA EMAIL ONLY: anita.jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov Anita Jenkins, AICP, Interim Director Planning and Zoning Division Collier County Growth Management Department Re:One Naples Applications PL20190000696 and PL20190000697/Written Materials for October 1, 2020 CCPC Agenda Packets Dear Ms. Jenkins: This firm represents Regatta at Vanderbilt Beach Commons Association, Inc., the members of which are also members of the Regatta at Vanderbilt Beach I Condominium Association, Inc., Regatta at Vanderbilt Beach II Condominium Association, Inc., and Regatta at Vanderbilt Beach III Condominium Association, Inc. (collectively referred to hereinafter as the “Regatta Condominium Associations”). We will be representing the Regatta Condominium Associations relative to the above-referenced applications at the scheduled public hearings, including the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) hearing on October 1, 2020. There will be several experts that will testify on behalf of the Regatta Condominium Associations, including Planner Greg Stuart with Stuart and Associates. Those same experts will also be testifying on behalf of Save Vanderbilt Beach, Inc. (SVB), who is represented by Attorney Ralf Brookes. The following exhibits were prepared by Mr. Stuart on behalf of the Regatta Condominium Associations and SVB: 1. Exhibit 2 - Regulatory Framework & Key Collier County Rules for Approval 2. Exhibit 3 - Composite Neighborhood Building Density Height & Setbacks 3. Exhibit 4 - Street Vacation Value and Applicant Benefit Assessment 4. Exhibit 5 - Required Compatibility Policies and Standards 5. Exhibit 6 - The One Naples Collier County Growth Management Plan Internal Consistency Assessment 6. Exhibit 7 - The C-3 Zoning District MUPD Compatibility & Intensity Assessment These exhibits are being submitted ten (10) days in advance of the CCPC hearing and both the Regatta Condominium Associations and SVB respectfully request that they are included in the 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1483 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) September 21, 2020 Page 2 October 1, 2020 CCPC Agenda Packet. We also ask that they are submitted into the record for that hearing and all subsequent public hearings. Exhibit 1 and Part 1 of the PowerPoint presentation will be entered into the record at the CCPC hearing (Part 2 is included as Exhibit 5). Should you have any questions regarding the foregoing or the enclosed, please do not hesitate to contact me directly via e-mail at sspector@ralaw.com or via telephone at 239.910.6683. Very truly yours, ROETZEL & ANDRESS, LPA Sarah E. Spector Enclosures (as stated) cc:James Sabo (via e-mail only w/ enc.: James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov) Corby Schmidt (via e-mail only w/ enc: Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov) Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Esq. (via e-mail only w/ enc.: Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov) Save Vanderbilt Beach, Inc. (via email only w/ enc.) Client (via e-mail only w/ enc.) Greg Stuart (via e-mail only w/ enc.) 15663867 _1 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1484 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) One Naples Applications PL20190000696 and PL20190000697 Written Materials for October 1, 2020 CCPC Agenda Packets Submitted on behalf of Regatta at Vanderbilt Beach Commons Association, Inc. and Save Vanderbilt Beach, Inc. 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1485 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) Table of Contents Exhibit 2 - Regulatory Framework & Key Collier County Rules for Approval Exhibit 3 - Composite Neighborhood Building Density Height & Setbacks Exhibit 4 - Street Vacation Value and Applicant Benefit Assessment Exhibit 5 - Required Compatibility Policies and Standards Exhibit 6 - The One Naples Collier County Growth Management Plan Internal Consistency Assessment Exhibit 7 - The C-3 Zoning District MUPD Compatibility & Intensity Assessment 2 8 13 17 34 45 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1486 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Two Regulatory Framework & Key Collier County Rules For Approval CASE _ THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING & STREET VACATION Page of 1 6 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1487 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 1. The Regulatory Framework _ Key Growth Management Plan Foundational Concepts: Collier Co. Growth Management Plan Underlying Concepts _ Management of Coastal Development (VII) Extensive populated areas in Collier County are vulnerable to periodic salt-water inundation from tropical storms or hurricanes. It is extremely important that an acceptable balance between at risk population and evacuation capability be achieved. Within the Coastal High Hazard Area maximum permissible residential density is limited in recognition of the level of risk, the existing deficiency of evacuation shelter space and existing patterns of density. Collier Co. Growth Management Plan Underlying Concepts _ Attainment of High Quality Urban Design While the Growth Management Plan as a whole provides the requisite foundation for superior urban design through a sound framework for growth (protection of natural resources, thoughtful guidance of land uses, adequate public facilities and adequate housing), the Future Land Use Element provides several additional measures. Collier County has also adopted Design Standards for all commercial development into the Land Development Code. These Architectural and Site development standards include building design, parking lot orientation, pedestrian access, vehicular movement, landscaping and lighting. 2. The Regulatory Framework _ Key Growth Management Plan Rules: Collier Co. Growth Management Plan Land Use Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. Collier Co. Growth Management Plan Land Use Objective 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Collier Co. Growth Management Plan Land Use Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. Page of 2 6 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1488 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Transportation Objective 7: Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and encourage safe and convenient on-site traffic circulation through the development review process. Collier Co. Growth Management Plan Coastal Management Policy 12.1.2: Land use plan amendments in the Category 1 hurricane vulnerability zone shall only be considered if such increases in densities provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times. 3. The Regulatory Framework _ Key LDC Density Rules: 4.07.02.B - Design Requirements _ External Relationships 1. Development within a PUD district shall be compatible with established or planned uses of surrounding neighborhoods and property. 2. The PUD shall provide protection of the development from potentially adverse surrounding influences and protection of the surrounding area from potentially adverse influences generated by or within the PUD. Fences, walls, or vegetative screening at the boundaries of PUD districts shall be provided, at a minimum, in accordance with the landscaping/ buffering requirements of section 4.06.00 to protect residents from undesirable views, lighting, noise, or other adverse off-site influences, or to protect. 4.07.02.B - Design Requirements _ Residential Density 3. The BCC may lessen density or intensity of development when it has been determined that development to the maximum density or intensity permissible in this section would: a. Create inconvenient or unsafe access to the PUD; or b. Create traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin or lead to the PUD; or c. Place a burden on parks, recreational areas, schools, and other facilities which serve or are proposed to serve the PUD; or d. Be in conflict with the intent or provisions of the GMP; or e. Create a threat to property or incur abnormal public expense in areas subject to natural hazards; or f. Be incompatible or inconsistent with surrounding neighborhoods or areas; g. Otherwise be inappropriate. Page of 3 6 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1489 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 4. The Regulatory Framework _ Key LDC Definitions: LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _ Open space: Areas that are not occupied by buildings, impervious parking areas, streets, driveways or loading areas and which may be equipped or developed with amenities designed to encourage the use and enjoyment of the space either privately or by the general public. Examples of open space include: areas of preserved indigenous native vegetation; areas replanted with vegetation after construction; lawns, landscaped areas and greenways; outdoor recreational facilities; and plazas, atriums, courtyards and other similar public spaces. LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _ Compatibility: A condition in which land uses or conditions can coexist in relative proximity to each other in a stable fashion over time such that no use or condition is unduly negatively impacted directly or indirectly by another use or condition. Merriam-Webster Definition _ Complementary: Mutually supporting each others lack; as in the complementary relationship that binds the two. LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _ Compatibility review: A review pursuant to the Architectural and Site Design Standards contained within section 5.05.08 of the Land Development Code (LDC) in effect at the time SBR Letters of Compliance are requested and that pertains to issues of compatibility with surrounding uses, complimentary patterns of development and mitigation of negative impacts. The Compatibility Review will be limited to compatibility issues, external sidewalks and pathway connections, lighting, dumpster location and screening, and orientation of buildings and ancillary facilities. LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _ Pedestrian pathway: The area between the Road Rights-of-Way and the building within the Commercial Mixed Use Project and the Residential Mixed Use PUD Project. The Pedestrian pathway shall include: street furnishings; a street tree planting zone, and a pedestrian travel zone, and shall be a minimum of 21 feet in width. Page of 4 6 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1490 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 5. The Regulatory Framework _ 2.03.06 PUD Purpose & Intent: Page of 5 6 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1491 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 6. The Regulatory Framework _ 4.02.38 C-3 Mixed Use Purpose & Intent: 4.02.38 - Specific Design Criteria for Mixed Use Development within C-1 through C-3 Zoning Districts B. Applicability. All properties zoned C-1, C-2 and C-3. These regulations shall apply to all mixed-use projects proposed within these zoning districts, subject to the design criteria set forth in this section. The design criteria address the relationship of buildings , parking, vehicular, and pedestrian movement to create a pedestrian oriented experience. Buildings are encouraged to be built close to the vehicular and pedestrian way to create a continuous active and vibrant streetscape utilizing the architecture, landscaping, lighting, signage, and street furnishings. Vehicular travel ways support two-way traffic and on street parking. A logical pedestrian pathway system is provided throughout that connects the pedestrian movements from one use to another or within use areas. Building arcades and awnings are allowed to extend over the sidewalk to create shade and encourage pedestrian activity. Signage design shall be carefully integrated with site and building design to create a unified appearance for the project. Creativity in the design of signs is encouraged in order to emphasize the unique character of the project. Projects utilizing these design criteria will be developed in compliance with the LDC, except as specified herein. Page of 6 6 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1492 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Three Composite Neighborhood Building Density, Height & Setbacks CASE _ THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING & STREET VACATION Page of 1 5 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1493 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Neighborhood Building Height _ 7.7 Story Average: Page of 2 5 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1494 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Neighborhood Building Height (cont.): Neighborhood Density _ Average 19.1 Units Per Acre: Page of 3 5 The South VBR Bay Colony PUD Neighborhood The North VBR Gulf Shore Dr. Neighborhood _ w./RT, C-3, RSF-3, RMF-6 & RMF-16 Zoning Vanderbilt B e a c h R d . N e i g h b o r h o o d E d g e Vanderbilt B e a c h R d . N e i g h b o r h o o d E d g e The South VBR Bay Colony PUD Neighborhood The North VBR Gulf Shore Dr. Neighborhood _ w./RT, C-3, RSF-3, RMF-6 & RMF-16 Zoning 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1495 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Neighborhood Density (Cont.): Neighborhood Setbacks _ Ave. 55.2-ft Front Yard Setback: Page of 4 5 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1496 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Neighborhood Setbacks (cont.): Page of 5 5 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1497 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Four _ Street Vacation Value and Applicant Benefit Assessment CASE _ THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING & STREET VACATION Page of 1 4 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1498 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services The Value Analysis _ Applicant Obtains Est. $7.49MM In Unique Economic Benefits While Also Obtaining Substantial Density Increase Page of 2 4 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1499 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services LDC 6.06.00 Transportation Sidewalks, Bike Lanes & Pathways Page of 3 4 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1500 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Page of 4 4 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1501 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !24 Exhibit Five Required Compatibility Policies and Standards CASE _ THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING & STREET VACATION 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1502 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !25 Part 2. Required Compatibility Policies and Standards 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1503 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !26 Required Compatibility Policies and Standards $PNQSFIFOTJWF.VUVBMMZ*OUFSEFQFOEFOU$PNQBUJCJMJUZ4UBOEBSET@$.JYFE6TF'PVOEBUJPO 4.02.38 - Specific Design Criteria for Mixed Use Development within C-1 through C-3 Zoning Districts A. Purpose and Scope. The Commercial Mixed Use design criteria are to encourage the development and the redevelopment of commercially zoned properties with a mix of residential and commercial uses. Such mixed-use projects are intended to be developed at a human-scale with a pedestrian orientation, interconnecting with adjacent project, whether commercial or residential. 4. The project shall provide street , pedestrian pathway and bike lane interconnections with adjacent properties, where possible and practicable. For projects subject to architectural design standards, see LDC section 5.05.08 F. for related provisions. 2. The pedestrian pathways along the main streets shall be a minimum of 21 feet in width. (See diagram below) 3. Pedestrian pathways shall be provided pursuant to Collier County LDC Section 4.02.38 D. and shall include: street furnishings, a street tree planting zone, and a pedestrian travel zone. (This is not applicable to internal parking lots). 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1504 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !27 Required Compatibility Policy and Standards _ Density Basis -BOE6TF$PNQBUJCJMJUZ1PMJDZ@$IBOHF¨(SFBUFSJOUFOTJUZ©UP¨"QQSPQSJBUFJOUFOTJUZ© Reasonable Density Increase: ‣To Match Neighborhood Average ‣19 Units Per Ac. Similar To Adjoining 12 Story Beachmoor ‣Best Neighborhood “fit” ‣Site Carrying Capacity To Sustain The Project 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1505 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !28 Required Compatibility Policy and Standards _ 19 Units Per Acre Average Neighborhood Density /FJHICPSIPPE"WFSBHF%FOTJUZ&YDMVEFT5XP0VUMJFS BDSF4JUFT Beachmoor _ 19 DUS/Ac. The Regatta _ 22.9 DUS/Ac. Neighborhood Ave. _ 19.1 DUS/Ac. 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1506 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !29 Required Compatibility Policy and Standards _ No Hotel Use/No Commercial Marina Language %FGJOF.BSJOB5P&OTVSF/P'VUVSF5SBOTJUJPO5P$PNNFSDJBM.BSJOB Delete Hotel Use _ ‣Can Reapply Separately Once Use Information Is Provided New Marina Use Definition _ ‣To ensure private, non- commercial ownership 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1507 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !30 Required Development Standards and Commitments _ Pathway, Landscaping and Round-about Standards For Safety & Compatibility /FX%FWFMPQNFOU$PNNJUNFOUT@"/FX3PVOEBCPVU$PEF$PNQMJBOU.VMUJVTF1BUIXBZ Pathway & Landscape Design Based On Existing 4.02.38 C-3 Mixed Use Design Criteria 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1508 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !31 *NQSPWFE4BGFS1FEFTUSJBOBOE7FIJDVMBS1SPKFDUBOE/FJHICPSIPPE$JSDVMBUJPO Required Development Standards and Commitments _ Pathway, Landscaping and Round-about Standards For Safety & Compatibility 5)*4 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1509 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !32 /P/FX-FH1SPKFDU(BUFXBZ$POOFDUJPO/P$POOFDUJPO4FQBSBUJPO4QBDJOH3FEVDUJPO /055)*4 Required Development Standards and Commitments _ Pathway, Landscaping and Round-about Standards For Safety & Compatibility 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1510 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !33 RULES & STANDARDS Existing C-3 One Naples Request Compatibility Standards Building Height 100-ft Towers _ 16 Stories, 77 to 208-ft Backbay Mid-rise _ 6 Stories 87-ft. Mid-rise _ 6 Stories 77-ft Garage _ 40-ft & 45_ft Tower 1 _ 12 Stories @ 135-ft Tower 2 _ 9 Stories @ 102-ft. Waterfront Bldg. _ 5 Stories @ 60-ft. Mid-rise _ 6 Stories @ 70-ft. Garage_ 25-ft/2 Level w./Mixed Use Liner * Floors @ 11-ft per floor; Garage @ 12.5-ft/fl Building Mass -*Backbay Mid-rise _ Footprint Length Cannot Exceed 60% of Seawall *30% of Vanderbilt Bch. Rd. & Gulf Shore Dr. Parking Garage Frontage For Mixed Use Liner Open Space 30%Includes Private Rooftop Recreation (15%?) 25% _ No Private Rooftop Recreation OS Setbacks (based on Compatibility Standard Height) Min. 25-ft 1/2 Bldg. Ht. Tower 1 _ 25-ft Tower 2 _ 25-ft Backbay Mid-rise_ 0-ft Bldg 5 Mid-rise _ 15-ft Garage_ 15-ft Towers 1 & 2 _ Min. 70-ft. Backbay Mid-rise_ Min. 25-ft. Vanderbilt Bch Rd. Bldg. 5 Mid-rise _ Min. 30-ft V.B.Rd. & Gulf Shore Dr. Garage_ Min. 30-ft Density 16 DUS/Acre 31.7 DUS/Acre 19 DUS/ac. _ Subject To Final Building Form, Parking & Site Capacity 86 Units 172 Units 102 Units Hotel Use No Yes No Required Compatibility Policy and Standards _ Summary Development Standards Table $PNQSFIFOTJWF.VUVBMMZ*OUFSEFQFOEFOU-BOE6TF5SBOTQPSUBUJPO$PNQBUJCJMJUZ4UBOEBSET 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1511 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !34 Required Compatibility Policy and Standards _ 1 - 12 Story/135-ft Fl Building w./ 25% Height Step-down 0OF5BMM#VJMEJOHX"WF)U4UFQEPXO'PS-PXFS5PXFS.JESJTF#VJMEJOHT 5)*4One Naples Compatibility Standards Based On The Regatta _ ‣One 12 Story Tower @ 135-ft Transition To ‣One 9 Story Min-tower @ 102-ft. To ‣One 6 Story Mid-rise @ 70-ft. To ‣One 5 Story Mid-rise @ 60-ft. 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1512 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !5XP"EKPJOJOH5PXFSTGU"QBSU!9$PEF)FJHIU/FJHICPSIPPE"WFSBHF !35 Required Compatibility Policy and Standards _ 2 16 Story/ 208-ft Building Height w./No Meaningful Transitioning ‣One 77-ft. Tall VBR Mid-rise Setback 15-ft ‣One 87-ft Tall Waterfront Mid-rise @ 14.5-ft per floor Setback 12.1ft/ Zero-ft From Backbay ‣Two 208-ft Tall Towers @ 13-ft. Per floor Setback 25-ft /05 5)*4 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1513 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !36 Required Compatibility Policy and Standards _ Gulf Shore Dr. & Vanderbilt Beach Road Human Scale Pedestrian Streetscape Urban Design Standards A Code Compliant 4.02.38 C-3 Mixed Use & PUD Design Criteria Pathway Within The Applicant’s Property @ 23-ft Wide Consisting of: ‣5-ft. ROW Planting Strip ‣8-ft. Mixed-use Pathway ‣10-ft. Wide Building Foundation Buffer )VNBO4DBMF1BSLJOH(BSBHF4USFFUTDBQF@GU4FUCBDLGU(BSBHF)FJHIU 5)*4 A Distinct 15-ft Wide Parking Garage Foundation Enhanced Buffer 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1514 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !37 0OF/BQMFT1BSLJOH(BSBHF4USFFUTDBQF@"/PODPNQBUJCMF.JTVTF0G'PSN4VCVSCBO4QBDF 1,067-ft +/- Frontage Parking Garage @ 40/45-ft Tall w./15-ft Setback Required Compatibility Policy and Standards _ Gulf Shore Dr. & Vanderbilt Beach Road Human Scale Pedestrian Streetscape Urban Design Standards /05 5)*4 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1515 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !38 Required Compatibility Policy and Standards _ 30% Garage Mixed Use Liner & 60% Building Mass Rules $PNQBUJCJMJUZ@4DBMFE%PXO#VJMEJOH.BTT.JYFE6TF1BSLJOH(BSBHF-JOFS ‣Waterfront Mid-rise _ Footprint Length Cannot Exceed 60% Of Seawall Length. ‣Parking Garage _ 30% Of Total VBR & GSD Road Frontage To Be Built For Mix-use Liner Space 5)*4 ‣A Code Compliant Pathway & Setback Based Upon 4.02.38 C-3 Specific Design Criteria ‣1,066-ft Of Parking Garage Frontage Broken Up By 320- ft Of Mixed Use Liner Space ‣ ‣ 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1516 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !39 5IF0OF/BQMFT8BUFSGSPOU#VJMEJOH*T-POHFS5IBO#BSFGPPU1FMJDBO /055)*4 Required Compatibility Policy and Standards _ No Intersection Streetscape Mixed Use & Building Mass Rules 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1517 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) !!StuartandAssociates Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.stuarturbandesign.com 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 677-6126 !40 Conclusion _ Mandatory Compatibility Conditions 8JUIPVU5IFTF4UBOEBSET5IF1SPKFDU*T/PU"QQSPWBCMF ‣If No Amendment Denial _ Then A 25% Open Space, 19 Units Per Ac. Project Conditioned As Follows: ‣ 25-ft. Tall Parking Garage Setback 30-ft.; ‣One 12-Story Tower @ 135-ft. Setback 70-ft.; ‣One 9-Story Tower @ 102-ft.; ‣VBR 6-Story 70-ft Tall Mid-rise Setback 30-ft.; and ‣One Waterfront 5-Story 60-ft. Tall Mid-rise Setback 25-ft. ‣30% & 60% Parking Garage & Building Mass Standards 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1518 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Six _ The One Naples Collier County Growth Management Plan Internal Consistency Assessment CASE _ THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING & STREET VACATION Page of 1 11 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1519 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services The MUPD Collier Co. Growth Management Plan Internal Consistency Assessment _ The map amendment and zoning application is not consistent with various goals, objectives and policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT - UNDERLYING CONCEPTS Management of Coastal Development: Two major coastal development issues in Collier County are the protection of natural resources and the balancing of risk in natural hazard areas. (VII) Extensive populated areas in Collier County are vulnerable to periodic salt-water inundation from tropical storms or hurricanes. It is extremely important that an acceptable balance between at risk population and evacuation capability be achieved. In addition, public and private investment in such vulnerable areas must be carefully considered. •RESPONSE _ One Naples requests an increase of density of 232% in the Coastal High Hazard Zone, from 74 units to 172 units. The new 98 units are equal to 167 additional persons to be evacuated and to be serviced in a post-evacuation environment. The Applicant’s proposed mitigation is to provide the county with 174 emergency cots and and a 16-ft. 2-axel enclosed trailer. The estimated value of the proposed mitigation is $36,320. The estimated range of economic benefits to the Applicant, is $9.8MM to $29.3MM (@ $100K to $300K per new unit). The One Naples project fails to “balance population risk and evacuation capacity”, along with fair and effective mitigation. The One Naples map amendment is contrary to public health and safety interests. Attainment of High Quality Urban Design - The report of the Regional/Urban Design Assistance Team (R/UDAT) for the Naples area, dated April 1987, and subsequent recommendations of the R/UDAT Citizen Committee, provides another underlying concept. While the Growth Management Plan as a whole provides the requisite foundation for superior urban design through a sound framework for growth (protection of natural resources, thoughtful guidance of land uses, adequate public facilities and adequate housing), the Future Land Use Element provides several additional measures. (XXI) Major attention is given to the patterns of commercial development in Collier County. Concern about commercial development relates to transportation impacts both on a micro (access to road network) and macro (distribution of trip attractors and resultant overall traffic circulation) level and it relates to aesthetics and sense of place. Within the Transportation Element a commitment to adopt standards for road access has been accomplished through the Access Collier County has also adopted Design Standards for all commercial development into the Land Development Code. These Architectural and Site development standards include building design, parking lot orientation, pedestrian access, vehicular movement, landscaping and lighting. These standards will provide for quality development that is responsive to the Community’s character. •RESPONSE _ One Naples development standard that feature a doubling of density (16 DUS per acre to 31.7), doubling of height (from 100-ft to 208-ft.), 70% to 100% reduction in setbacks (from 104-ft to 25-ft and a 12.1 to zero foot waterfront setback), a 1,066 linear foot +/- VBR and GSD parking garage at 40 to 45-ft tall setback from the street by 15-ft., a 10-ft and 15-ft pedestrian pathway compared to the code required 21-ft pathway, and the use of private rooftop recreation for open space while generally Page of 2 11 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1520 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services not providing any common open space, are standards inconsistent with the attainment of “High Quality Urban Design”. FUTURE LAND USE OBJECTIVE 3: Ensure protection of natural and historic resources, ensure the availability of land for utility facilities, promote compatible land uses within the airport noise zone, and to provide for management of growth in an efficient and effective manner through Land Development Regulations adopted to implement this Growth Management Plan. •RESPONSE _ The One Naples 15-ft Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive (VBR and GSD) street setback effectively precludes any required future right-of-way and road expansion. Thus the development standard does not ensure the availability of land for utility facilities. The doubling of density, doubling of height, 70% to 100% reduction in setbacks, a 15-ft setback for a 1,066 linear foot +/- VBR and GSD parking garage at 40 to 45-ft tall, and the use of private rooftop recreation for common open space are standards inconsistent with LDC regulations and are not effective regulations needed to insure internal consistency. The project is not consistent with Objective 3. Policy3.2: Land Development Regulations have been adopted into the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) that contain provisions to implement the Growth Management Plan through the development review process. These include the following provisions: F The safe and convenient flow of on-site traffic, as well as the design of vehicle parking areas, are addressed through the site design standards and site development plan requirements of the LDC, which include: access requirements from roadways, parking lot design and orientation, lighting, building design and materials, and landscaping and buffering criteria. •RESPONSE _ The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new “4-leg” project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project east bound left-out turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. The project requires a parking space deviation to reduce the number of required parking spaces. These facts demonstrate that the project does not advance safe and convenient flow of on-site traffic. The MUPD development standards weaken existing C-3 mixed use rules and reduces LDC efficiency and effectiveness. The application Exhibit G Streetscape Landscaping illustrates the applications lack of consistency with Objective 3 in so far as site planning, streetscape pathway design, urban design and buffering. The project’s streetscape tree planting standards are the code minimum. The project’s pathway design is 8-ft and not the code required 21-ft minimum. The project fails to meet adjoining property and neighborhood compatibility standards. The project fails to meet it’s entitlement request criteria under LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5. The project is not consistent with Objective 3 and 3F. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Page of 3 11 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1521 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services OBJECTIVE 5: Implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element. •RESPONSE _The map amendment language and the planned development standards do not ensure compatibility of land uses; the request eliminates existing C-3 zoning standards and proposes extreme new development standards. The project is not consistent with Objective 5 and Policies 5.3 and 5.6. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis. Policy 5.3: All rezoning must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan. For properties that are zoned inconsistent with the Future Land Use Designation Description Section but have nonetheless been determined to be consistent with the Future Land Use Element, as provided for in Policies 5.9 through 5.13, the following provisions apply: •RESPONSE _ The One Naples mixed use planned development is not internally consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis slides 8 - 16. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. •RESPONSE _The One Naples mixed planned development is not compatible with and complementary to the Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhoods. It is logically impossible for a project that doubles the density, increase height by 208%, incorporates 70% to 100% reduction in setbacks, features a 15-ft setback for a 1,066 linear foot +/- VBR and GSD 40 to 45-ft tall parking garage, and uses private rooftop recreation while not providing any functional common open space, to be found “complimentary and compatible” with surrounding land uses. The project fails to meet it’s entitlement request criteria under LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis. OBJECTIVE 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: •RESPONSE _ It is logically and visually impossible for a project that doubles the density, increase height by 208%, incorporates 70% to 100% reduction in setbacks, features a 15-ft setback for a 1,066 linear foot +/- VBR and GSD 40 to 45-ft tall parking garage, and uses private rooftop recreation while not providing any functional common open space, to be found to “adhere to the existing development character” of the Collier County neighborhood. The One Naples project’s development character is not compatible and complimentary to existing development character and is not internally consistent with Objective 7 and Policies 7.3 and 7.4. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part 8 The One Naples Planning Analysis. Page of 4 11 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1522 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. •RESPONSE _ The applicant is applying for a plat vacation for Gulf Shore Court and the western portion of Center Street (PL20200000368 is a Petition for Vacation). By definition and logic, the plat vacation demonstrates comprehensive plan Policy 7.3 inconsistency since it eliminates an existing interconnected street grid. The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new “4-leg” project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project east bound left-out turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project is not consistent with Policy 7.3. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. •RESPONSE _ The project is based on a 15-ft setback VBR and GSD for a 1,066 linear foot +/- parking garage at 40 to 45-ft tall, with a pathway design that does not meet 4.02.38 C-3 Mixed Use and code 2.03.06 PUD 21-ft wide pathway standards. One Naples uses a 15-ft setback with an 8-ft VBR/GSD pathway within the public ROW. One Naples uses a 10-ft Southbay Drive and Center Street setback with 5-ft sidewalk. The project’s pathway standards are below the code required 21-ft pathway standard. The project is based on using private rooftop recreation open space while not providing any functional common open space. This leads to increased intensity appearance while diminishing pedestrian scale walkable environments. The One Naples project’s development height, bulk and building form does not encourage “walkable communities with common open space”. The project eliminates functional mixed uses at the VBR/GSD intersection and streetscape level, thereby creating a 1,000 foot non-active “dead zone”. The project is not compatible and complimentary to the GSD and VBR streetscape, hinders a walkable neighborhood environment, is is not consistent with 7.4. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis. Page of 5 11 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1523 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services FUTURE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT _ D.3.D _ Transportation Element C. Perspectives: 1. Land Use Issues (VI) The Transportation Element is closely related to the Future Land Use Element. It has long been the pattern that the development of land necessitates improvements and expansion to the transportation system. The two elements are so closely tied, in fact, that changes or shifts in the land use patterns can drastically impact the performance of the roadway system. It is for that reason that the County requires most land development proposals (e.g., DRI, rezone and conditional use requests) to submit a Traffic Impact Statement. An analysis of the proposal’s impact is prepared and submitted to the recommending and approving authorities. (VI) The County has also recognized the importance of good site planning as it relates to a project’s ingress and egress from the major roadway system. Inadequate control of access points, median openings and signalized intersections can accelerate the deterioration of the systems overall level of service just as fast as the increases in traffic volumes. The County has developed and adopted policies to control the number, location and type of access points to the road network. These policies are based on the Collier County Access Control Policy (Resolution No. 92-42) and follow- up Resolution No. 01-247, and existing road and land use conditions, and are outlined in Section 4.04.02 of the Land Development Code •RESPONSE _ The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new “4-leg” project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project east bound left-out turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. The project requires a parking space deviation to reduce the number of required parking spaces. These facts demonstrate that the project incorporates a very poor site plan as it relates to a project’s ingress and egress from the major roadway system. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE 3: Provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future rights-of-way based upon improvement projects identified within the Five Year Work Program, Board approved development agreements, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO’s) adopted Long-Range Transportation Plan and/or similar Board approved studies, plans and programs. •RESPONSE _ The One Naples 15-ft Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive (VBR and GSD) street setback effectively precludes any required future right-of-way and road expansion. Thus the development standard does not ensure the availability of land for utility facilities and is inconsistent with Objective 3 requirement to protect future right-of- way. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Page of 6 11 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1524 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE 4: Provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians and non-motorized vehicles through the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan. •RESPONSE _ The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new “4-leg” project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project east bound left-out turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. The project requires a parking space deviation to reduce the number of required parking spaces. These facts demonstrate that the project does not advance safe and convenient flow of on-site traffic. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards slides 31 and 32, and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis slide 25 -16. The project is not consistent with Objective 4. Policy 4.7: The County shall incorporate bike lanes in roadway resurfacing projects as is physically possible and will not result in a safety or operational problem. Policy 5.1 (the Question for you to address is whether the Applicant complies with 5.1; if they do we need to not discuss 5.1): The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. (IX) Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways. •RESPONSE _ The One Naples Master Plan applicant’s proposed mitigation is based on untested assumptions and does not address the VBR key problem; i.e., east bound turning movements and traffic congestion. The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive, thereby reducing mitigation efficiency and traffic circulation safety. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new “4-leg” project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project east bound left-out turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning Page of 7 11 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1525 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements and thereby reducing mitigation efficiency and traffic circulation safety. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards slides 31 and 32, and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis slide 25 -16. The project is not consistent with Policy 4.7. TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE 7: Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and encourage safe and convenient on-site traffic circulation through the development review process. •RESPONSE _ The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new “4-leg” project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project east bound left-out turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project eliminates potential proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. This increases traffic congestion. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards slides 31 and 32, and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis slide 25 -16. The project is not consistent with Objective 7. Policy 7.1: Collier County shall apply the standards and criteria of the Access Management Policy as adopted by Resolution and as may be amended to ensure the protection of the arterial and collector system’s capacity and integrity. •RESPONSE _ The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new “4-leg” project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project left-out east bound turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. This increases traffic congestion. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards slides 31 and 32, and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis slide 25 -16. The project is not consistent with Policy 7.1. Policy 7.2: The County shall require the submission of a neighborhood traffic impact assessment as a part of all rezone and conditional use applications. This study will analyze the proposed project’s impact on surrounding neighborhood streets. •RESPONSE _ The One Naples Master Plan TIS does not evaluate the proposed 215-ft intersection connection separation reduction to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan TIS does not fully evaluate the requests a new “4-leg” project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and its left-out east bound turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. Page of 8 11 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1526 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The One Naples Master Plan TIS does not evaluate the relationship of the project’s elimination of potential proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services to greater VBR to US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. The project is not consistent with Policy 7.2 Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. •RESPONSE _ The project is based on a 15-ft setback VBR and GSD for1,066 linear feet +/- of parking garage at 40 to 45-ft tall, with a pathway design that does not meet 4.02.38 C-3 Mixed Use and PUD 2.03.06 21-ft wide pathway standards. One Naples uses a 15-ft setback with an 8-ft VBR/GSD pathway within the public ROW. One Naples uses a 10-ft Southbay Drive and Center Street setback with 5-ft sidewalk. The project does not incorporate the code required 21-ft pathway standard. The project is based on using private rooftop recreation open space while not providing functional common open space. This fact leads to increased intensity appearance while diminishing pedestrian scale walkable environments and neighborhood compatibility. The One Naples project’s development height, bulk and building form does not encourage “walkable communities with common open space”. The project eliminates functional mixed uses at the VBR/GSD intersection and streetscape level, thereby creating a 1,000 foot non-active “dead zone”. The project is not compatible and complimentary to the GSD and VBR streetscape, hinders a walkable neighborhood environment, is is not consistent with 7.4. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis. FUTURE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT _ HURRICANE COASTAL MANAGEMENT GOAL 12: To Make Every Reasonable Effort To Ensure The Public Safety, Health and Welfare Of People and Property From The Effective of Hurricane Damage •RESPONSE _ One Naples requests an increase of density of 232% in the Coastal High Hazard Zone, from 74 units to 172 units. The new 98 units are equal to 167 additional persons to be evacuated and to be serviced in a post-evacuation environment. The One Naples project fails to “make every reasonable effort to ensure public safety”. The One Naples project fails to provide for fair and effective mitigation in a balanced manner. The One Naples map amendment is contrary to public health and safety interests and is inconsistent with Goal 12. Please refer to the testimony and documentation provided by Daniel Trescott, MUARP regarding hurricane evacuation and mitigation. Policy 12.1.2: Land use plan amendments in the Category 1 hurricane vulnerability zone shall only be considered if such increases in densities provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times. Page of 9 11 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1527 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services •RESPONSE _ One Naples requests an increase of density of 232% in the Coastal High Hazard Zone, from 74 units to 172 units. The new 98 units are equal to 167 additional persons to be evacuated and to be serviced in a post-evacuation environment. The Applicant’s proposed mitigation is to provide the county with 174 emergency cots and and a 16-ft. 2-axel enclosed trailer. The estimated value of the proposed mitigation is $36,320. The estimated range of economic benefits to the Applicant, is $9.8MM to $29.3MM (@ $100K to $300K per new unit). The One Naples project fails to provide for fair and effective mitigation in a balanced manner. The One Naples map amendment is contrary to public health and safety interests and is inconsistent with 12.1.2. Please refer to the testimony and documentation provided by Daniel Trescott, MUARP regarding hurricane evacuation and mitigation. Policy 12.1.13: The County shall continue to mitigate previously identified shelter deficiencies through mitigation from Developments of Regional Impact, Emergency Management Preparedness and Enhancement grants, Hazard Mitigation and Pre-disaster Mitigation Grant Programs funding, and available funds identified in the State’s annual shelter deficit studies. •RESPONSE _ One Naples requests an increase of density of 232% in the Coastal High Hazard Zone, from 74 units to 172 units. The new 98 units are equal to 167 additional persons to be evacuated and to be serviced in a post-evacuation environment. The Applicant’s proposed mitigation is to provide the county with 174 emergency cots and and a 16-ft. 2-axel enclosed trailer. The estimated value of the proposed mitigation is $36,320. The estimated range of economic benefits to the Applicant, is $9.8MM to $29.3MM (@ $100K to $300K per new unit). The One Naples project fails to provide for fair and effective mitigation. The One Naples map amendment is contrary to public health and safety interests and is inconsistent with 12.1.3. Please refer to the testimony and documentation provided by Daniel Trescott, MUARP regarding hurricane evacuation and mitigation. Policy 7.2.1: The County shall apply the marina siting criteria contained in the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan (NR-SP-93-01), May 1995 in order to direct increased boat traffic away from sensitive manatee habitats. •RESPONSE _ The One Naples GMP map amendment has not provided information regarding its requested marina. The application violates FSS 163.3177(6) by not providing any data and analysis regarding marina siting, fuel dock location, seagrass baseline and impacts, manatee impacts, water quality baseline and impacts, and other key data and analysis. The One Naples map amendment is inconsistent with 7.2.1. Policy 7.2.2:Sea-grass beds shall be protected through the application of Policies 6.3.1, 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 of this Element. •RESPONSE _ The One Naples GMP map amendment has not provided information regarding its requested marina. The application violates FSS 163.3177(6) by not providing any data and analysis regarding marina siting and seagrass baseline and impacts. The One Naples map amendment is inconsistent with 7.2.2. Policy 10.1.5: New marinas shall conform to the following criteria: a. Marinas must provide vehicular parking and sewage pump-out facilities; b. Fueling facilities shall be designed to contain spills from on-land equipment and shall be prepared to contain spills in the water. c. Marina facilities must be accessible to all public services essential to ensure their safe operation. Page of 10 11 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1528 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services d. Marinas and multi-slip docking facilities shall prepare hurricane plans for approval which describe measures to be taken to minimize damage to marina sites and neighboring properties and the environment; this hurricane plan shall be reviewed and approved by the County. e. Dry storage should be encouraged over wet storage. •RESPONSE _ The One Naples GMP amendment has not provided information regarding its requested marina. The application violates FSS 163.3177(6) by not providing data and analysis regarding marina siting, marina service access and circulation, dumpster service location, fuel dock location and fuel spill protection, water quality baseline and water quality protection and management, and seagrass baseline and impacts. The One Naples map amendment is inconsistent with 10.1.5. Page of 11 11 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1529 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Seven _ The C-3 Zoning District/MUPD Compatibility & Intensity Assessment CASE _ THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING & STREET VACATION Page of 1 3 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1530 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services The Zoning District Compatibility & Intensity Assessment _ C-3 Is More Compatible and Less Intensive Than One Naples The applicant puts forward a justification that resulting development impacts, form and intensity under the existing C-3 will be worse for the neighborhood than the One Naples project. This assertion is false for the following reasons: 1.C-3 zoning is to support neighborhood commercial uses and activities; it permits neighborhood business, professional and personal services and small scale retail uses. Large retail uses greater than 5,000 sf are not permitted; no big Box Retail, Walmart, etc. 2.The Applicant’s justification assumes the site can support 31,000 sf of restaurant and 69,000 sf of retail, equal to 100,000 sf/42% site coverage. A more accurate and feasible 22% commercial use site coverage yields 52,000 sf, which is a compatible and normal neighborhood commercial center. 3.C-3 does not permit wholesale retail types of uses, does not permit outdoor storage, equipment and merchandise, and does not permit Hotels. 4.C-3 Neighborhood Commercial provides for local neighborhood goods and services and thus is compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods. Local neighborhood goods and services serve to reduce vehicular trips and trip length for US 41 goods and services. •One Naples does not provide meaningful type and mixture of neighborhood oriented goods; it will add to VBR and GSD traffic congestion because of the rezoning. No Hotel traffic impact analysis has been provided by the Applicant. 5.C-3 Business Commercial development may effectively disperse traffic via the Gulf Shore Ct./Southbay Dr./Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Gulf Shore Dr. Street grid with a 565- ft. Gulf Shore Ct./Southbay Drive intersection separation and no east bound left- out turning movements aligned with the parking garage. •One Naples reduces safe intersection connection separation by 215-ft (from 565-ft to 350-ft.), while creating a new conflicting, east bound left-out aligned with the parking garage. 6.C-3 residential mixed use requires human scale pedestrian environment (see 4.02.38 Specific Design Criteria). C-3 requires: •A 21-ft wide pedestrian pathway with street furnishings and street plantings; Page of 2 3 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1531 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services ✴The Applicant is requesting an 8-ft multi-use path with no street furnishings; •C-3 Mixed Use requires enhanced parking lot plantings, enhanced building foundation plantings and building architectural standards; ✴The Applicant has not provided building architectural elevations and measurable designs, and has not provided detailed planting material information, as required by code. 7.C-3 Setbacks for the One Naples project are 25-ft parking garage and 104-ft for the two towers; these setbacks serve to reduce project intensity appearance and support neighborhood compatibility. • One Naples setbacks are 15-ft parking garage, 25-ft for the two towers and a 12.1-ft/zero-ft waterfront setback. These setbacks increase project intensity appearance and are completely detrimental to neighborhood compatibility. 8.C-3 provides for private and public common open space while relying on 30% open space. One Naples does not provide for public common open while relying on swimming pool rooftop open space. Page of 3 3 9.A.2.y Packet Pg. 1532 Attachment: One Naples RALAW (13774 : PL20190000697 PUDZ One Naples PUD) 10/15/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.3 Item Summary: ***Note: This item to be heard at 3:00 pm*** PL20200001297 GMPA - A Resolution Relating to The Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended, providing for the annual update to the schedule of Capital Improvement Projects, within the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan based on the 2020 Annual Update And Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR), and including updates to the 5-year schedule of Capital Projects contained within the Capital Improvement Element (for Fiscal Years 2021 - 2025) and the Schedule of Capital Projects contained within The Capital Improvement Element for the future 5-year period (for Fiscal Years 2026 - 2030), providing for severability, and providing for an effective date. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 10/15/2020 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning Name: Corby Schmidt 09/30/2020 5:25 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 09/30/2020 5:25 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Anita Jenkins Additional Reviewer Completed 10/01/2020 1:36 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 10/01/2020 2:18 PM Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 10/02/2020 3:26 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 10/05/2020 11:29 AM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 10/05/2020 6:18 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 10/06/2020 10:52 AM Planning Commission Edwin Fryer Meeting Pending 10/15/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.3 Packet Pg. 1533 PL20200001297/CPSP-2020-1 2020 AUIR/CIE STAFF REPORT ‒ Collier County Planning Commission Hearing of October 15 pg. 1 Staff Report Presentation to the Collier County Planning Commission of the 2020 combined Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities and Schedule of Capital Improvements as provided for in Chapter 6.02.02 of the Collier County Land Development Code and Section 163.3177(3)(b), Florida Statutes OBJECTIVE: That the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) review the combined 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR)/Capital Improvement Element (CIE) on public facilities and provide recommendations to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) on specific projects and associated funding sources for inclusion in the Schedule of Capital Improvements within the CIE during the FY19/20 annual update. Only “Category A” public facilities are included in the CIE. The AUIR identifies capital needs for new facilities to serve population growth projected for the five-year AUIR period. As with past AUIR, this year’s AUIR presents additional information related to individual Division/Department operational data. This additional data is provided to evaluate the year-to-year change in demand experienced by each AUIR component and to assist the CCPC in making recommendations upon the appropriateness of the County’s current Level of Service (LOS) Standards and timing/necessity of proposed projects. The AUIR constitutes the process of evaluating budgetary priorities, as well as determining appropriateness of the County’s currently adopted LOS Standards. BACKGROUND: Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, requires the County to adopt certain Land Development Regulations (LDR) to implement its Growth Management Plan adopted on January 10, 1989. Land Development Code (LDC) Section 6.02.00 requires the County to, “Provide that public facilities and services meet or exceed the standards established in the CIE required by Section 163.3177 and are available when needed for the development…” This Section of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes is commonly known as the concurrency requirement. Accordingly, on March 21, 1990, the Board adopted the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance No. 90-24. This Ordinance was subsequently codified in LDC Section 6.02.02. Laws of Florida require each local government to maintain concurrency management for its Stormwater Management System, Potable Water System, Wastewater Treatment Systems and Solid Waste Disposal services and facilities. During the 2011 AUIR/CIE process, the County decided to maintain concurrency for the optional facilities of Schools, Arterial and Collector Roads and Bridges, and Parks and Recreation facilities, based upon the perspective that maintaining concurrency management for the optional facilities is necessary to sustain the currently identified levels of service for the respective facilities and to ensure that the demands of new development are provided for by system expansion corresponding to those demands. As noted, LDC Section 6.02.02 establishes the management and monitoring program for public facilities, which provides for an annual determination of LOS Standard concurrency for “Category A” public facilities and identification of need for additional facilities. “Category A” facilities are arterial and collector roads, drainage system and stormwater management, potable water supply and distribution, 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 1534 Attachment: Staff Report-2020 AUIR_post-CM Briefing FNL (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) PL20200001297/CPSP-2020-1 2020 AUIR/CIE STAFF REPORT ‒ Collier County Planning Commission Hearing of October 15 pg. 2 wastewater treatment systems, solid waste disposal, public schools, and parks. The AUIR also provides analysis and recommendations on “Category B” facilities for which the County has adopted LOS Standards and collects impact fees. “Category B” facilities are jail and correctional facilities, law enforcement, library buildings and collections, emergency medical services, and government buildings. Adoption of LOS Standards for “Category B” facilities legally validate impact fees for these facilities. Coastal Zone beach re-nourishment and inlet management projects were added to the AUIR as a new “Category C” [County Manager direction: 2013]. This addition allows the Board to formally and predictably evaluate the condition of each project for their respective capital programming. “Category C” areas (coastal zone beaches and inlets) are not subject to concurrency management or coupled to impact fee funding. The quality and usability of these features are sustained through periodic surveys, and maintenance and management programs, funded with tourist development taxes and other revenue sources. Where the AUIR identifies deficiencies or potential deficiencies, the Board’s action options, per LDC Section 6.02.02, include, but are not limited to: 1. Establishing Areas of Significant Influence (ASI) surrounding deficient road segments which are not in a Traffic Congestion Management Area (TCMA) or Traffic Congestion Exception Area (TCEA). 2. Adding public facility projects to the financially feasible Schedule of Capital Improvements in the CIE. Road projects must be in the first or second year of the next adopted Schedule to be factored as available capacity in the real-time Transportation Concurrency Management System database. 3. Deferring development order issuance for development not vested by statute in service areas affected by deficient public facilities. This applies to necessary improvements both pending and not financially feasible, or not in the five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements, and could result in the following remedial actions: a. Modifying levels of service via Growth Management Plan amendment; b. Directing staff to include the necessary public facility projects in a future annual CIE update and amendment to be adopted by the Board; c. Approving new or increased revenue sources for needed public facility projects, by the Board, the State Legislature or the County voters; or d. Allowing developer constructed improvements guaranteed by an enforceable development agreement. The options identified above are crafted under the design of maintaining a fiscally feasible CIE based on the concurrency management system. The requirement for financial feasibility is a local requirement, no longer a statutory requirement. The Board, through Objective 2 of the CIE, provides direction to maintain an annual financially feasible Schedule of Capital Improvements. CIE ~ OBJECTIVE 2: (FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY) Provide public facilities, as described in Policy 1.1 above, to maintain adopted level of service standards that are within the ability of the County to fund… 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 1535 Attachment: Staff Report-2020 AUIR_post-CM Briefing FNL (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) PL20200001297/CPSP-2020-1 2020 AUIR/CIE STAFF REPORT ‒ Collier County Planning Commission Hearing of October 15 pg. 3 Policies 1.1 through 1.5 of the CIE establish the standards for levels of service for “Category A” public facilities. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Preparation and presentation of the AUIR to the CCPC and Board meets the requirements of LDC Section 6.02.02 for an annual determination of the status of public facilities. Board direction to include the projects identified in the AUIR in a financially feasible Schedule of Capital Improvements will establish and maintain concurrency for “Category A” public facilities, except roads, for the next twelve months. Road projects needed to maintain or restore adopted levels of service deficiencies must be scheduled in the first or second year of the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The CIE Schedule of Capital Improvements requires only a single public hearing before the Collier County Planning Commission (sitting in its official role as the County’s land planning agency) and a single public hearing before the governing board (Board) as an adoption hearing. This single hearing process allows for concurrent hearings of the AUIR and CIE. When adopted, both the AUIR and CIE processes are complete, as the updated CIE is not required to be sent to the State Land Planning agency. Level of Service Appropriateness: As indicated within the Objective section above, the AUIR provides the CCPC with a platform to make evaluations and recommendations regarding the appropriateness of the County’s current Levels of Service Standards. The process of capital improvement programming for the County is a linear equation for most components of the AUIR; (New Population x Level of Service Standard = Capital Improvement). This equation is the only justification required of the proposed capital improvement. While Public Utilities, Stormwater Management and Transportation have developed a more complex formula and system for maintaining Level of Service Standards which dictates capital expansion, the basic premise of additional demand requiring new improvements remains the underlying fundamental of the equation. The AUIR provides an opportunity on an annual basis for the CCPC to evaluate and provide recommendations on the appropriateness of currently adopted Level of Service Standards. Within each individual section, the year‒to‒year demand for service or demands upon the system are included to assist the advisory boards and the Board in this determination. Level of Service Standards and Impact Fees: Impact fee studies and methodologies in and of themselves do not establish Level of Service Standards. They serve at a minimum, to establish a base line where levels of service cannot fall below without invalidating the impact fee. A level of service that is established by an impact fee study represents the standard that has been achieved for a facility, but does not dictate that a local government cannot adopt a Level of Service Standard that is higher than the achieved level of service. However, the difference between the achieved level of service and the adopted Level of Service Standard requires supplemental funding from a source other than impact fees to fund the cost of the improvement. EMS is an AUIR component in which the impact fee level of service is below the AUIR adopted Level of Service Standards. This discrepancy is resulting in a higher level of necessary supplemental general governmental funding, which is being allocated from monies raised by the Local Infrastructure Sales Tax. 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 1536 Attachment: Staff Report-2020 AUIR_post-CM Briefing FNL (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) PL20200001297/CPSP-2020-1 2020 AUIR/CIE STAFF REPORT ‒ Collier County Planning Commission Hearing of October 15 pg. 4 The established Level of Service Standards for most AUIR components are currently satisfied based upon the levels of service and current population levels. Approval of development projects where public facility improvements do not appear in the AUIR or CIE however, but must be introduced or expanded in accommodation, continues to contribute to the diminished available capacity of respective AUIR component infrastructure and service providers. Among other contributing factors to diminished available capacity, is our access to new technology, as in the example of Library materials. Based upon these diminishing capacities, the due diligence process to bring about the next generation of system expansion requires continued revenue growth to maintain the Level of Service Standards for AUIR component providers. Population: The population projections utilized with the 2020 AUIR are based upon prior Board policy direction and acceptance from the State of Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO). The population method utilizes the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) medium range projections for the entire projection period with a twenty percent (20%) seasonal adjustment factor applied to permanent population projections. The table below presents a comparison of the past six years of projected permanent population growth figures. AUIR Year BEBR Estimate Permanent Population Following 5-Year BEBR Growth Projections 5 Year Growth Percent Growth Percent Annualized 2014 341,914 348,373 354,982 361,717 368,579 375,571 9.84% 1.97% 2015 346,371 352,771 359,289 365,927 372,688 379,084 9.44% 1.89% 2016 353,936 360,846 367,892 375,074 381,722 387,814 9.57% 1.91% 2017 360,825 368,073 375,467 382,465 389,053 395,753 9.68% 1.93% 2018 368,534 376,086 383,166 389,754 394,004 400,292 8.61%* 1.72%* 2019 374,994 382,800 389,669 396,661 403,779 411,024 9.60% 1.92% 2020 388,128 395,249 402,501 409,885 417,406 424,165 9.28% 1.86% The above table illustrates 2020 as another successive year in which the annualized growth rate is projected at under two percent of the (unincorporated) total population. This outlook reinforces the contemporary growth reality of a steadily growing population for the County. The projected population increase totals 36,037 for the five-year period or, 7,207 per year. Utilizing the County’s 2.38 persons per household (PPH) rate, these projected 7,207 new people per year, translate to an average of 3,028 new dwelling units constructed each year (presuming new population is housed only by new units and not existing inventory). The recalibration of Collier County’s population through the 2010 Census had provided additional capacity to each of the AUIR/CIE population-based systems; but, the population added since continues 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 1537 Attachment: Staff Report-2020 AUIR_post-CM Briefing FNL (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) PL20200001297/CPSP-2020-1 2020 AUIR/CIE STAFF REPORT ‒ Collier County Planning Commission Hearing of October 15 pg. 5 to consume this capacity. As such, each of the AUIR providers continue the due diligence process for their next system expansion. The following table provides Certificate of Occupancy (CO) figures issued per year since 2010. Compilation Year * Single Family COs Multi-Family COs Single & Multi Family 2011-2012 747 480 1,227 2012-2013 806 454 1,260 2013-2014 1,436 286 1,722 2014-2015 2,065 1,010 3,075 2015-2016 2,548 777 3,325 2016-2017 2,776 980 3,756 2017-2018 2,424 442 2,866 2018-2019 2,652 1,156 3,808 2019-2020 3,216 1,016 4,232 * Based upon April 2019 through March 2020 CO data, compiled annually by the Growth Management Department. Approximately 3,216 single-family dwellings and 1,016 multi-family units were constructed (and certified for occupancy, in this compilation year *) – for a total of 4,232 units. These figures represent an overall increase over the previous year’s residential construction , but a decrease in multi-family units, when 2,652 single-family dwellings and 1,156 multi-family units – for a total of just 3,808 units, were constructed. These figures are provided to better evaluate the market’s response to fluctuations in demand for new housing units. In addition, the Board directed that population projections for Golden Gate City be prepared beginning with fiscal year 2017/18.** This direction is based on the County to serve all portions of the Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA) franchise utility service area east of Santa Barbara Blvd. within the 10-year AUIR planning window. The future service area is approximately four square miles in size, and can be more specifically described as all of Sections 21, 22, 23, and 28 and portions of Sections 15 and 16 in Township 49 S, Range 26 E, as bounded on the north by Green Blvd., on the east by Collier Blvd., on the south by Golden Gate Canal, and on the west by Santa Barbara Blvd. The population figures for this area – along with information regarding treatment capacity, acquisition and implementation planning are included herein. These are provided under the Level of Service Standards (LOSS) Assessments, and illustrated in the LOSS charts, within the Potable Water System and Wastewater Treatment Systems’ reports in the AUIR/CIE booklet. ** Adopted by Resolution 2017-123, on June 27, 2017. Schools: The Schools section of the AUIR stands as a unique component. A summary of the School District Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan is provided for review by the CCPC. But when the AUIR is 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 1538 Attachment: Staff Report-2020 AUIR_post-CM Briefing FNL (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) PL20200001297/CPSP-2020-1 2020 AUIR/CIE STAFF REPORT ‒ Collier County Planning Commission Hearing of October 15 pg. 6 reviewed, the School District’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) will already have been approved by the School Board, as required by the Florida Department of Education. The proposed School CIP has been reviewed by County staff in conjunction with School District staff to ensure no inconsistencies exist with the timing of new facilities and required infrastructure. The District’s five-year CIP includes completing the Immokalee High School addition/renovations project (’21) and planning, engineering and construction for opening the new High School on Veteran’s Memorial Boulevard, west of Livingston Road in North Naples (’23). While the Schools component is included as part of the “Category A” facilities which dictate the concurrency management system for the County, concurrency management for schools is administered by the School District. Requirements changed for referencing School District documents when the County amended the CIE in 2017. Each year since, the County adopts, by reference, into its CIE, the School District’s annually updated financially feasible Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and the District Facilities Work Program to achieve and maintain the adopted level of service standards for Public School Facilities. The School District Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan identifies the financially feasible school facility capacity projects necessary to address existing deficiencies and future needs based on achieving and maintaining adopted LOS standards for schools. The District Facilities Work Program, prepared by the School District pursuant to Section 1013.35(1)(b), F.S., is adopted as part of the data and analysis in support of the School District’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Adoption by the County, of the School District’s Capital Improvement Plan and the District Facilities Work Program now occurs, without requiring separate action, with approval of the annual update to the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The recommendation sought from the CCPC related to the School District’s proposed Capital Improvement Plan is to find that no inconsistencies are contained within the District’s Capital Improvement Plan compared to the other planned capital improvement projects within the County’s AUIR or CIE. FISCAL IMPACT: Revenues are required to fund the Capital Improvement projects proposed in the 2020 AUIR/CIE for the FY19/20 thru FY23/24 planning period to maintain financial feasibility of scheduled “Category A” facility improvements. These funds must be made available by the Board of County Commissioners or fall within the Board’s statutory general governmental taxing authority. Current and proposed revenues needed to fund public facility construction/expansion for the FY19/20 thru FY23/24 planning period are set forth in each respective capital facilities section of the 2020 AUIR/CIE update. Project expenditures more than estimated impact fee, gas tax, and user fee revenue receipts and funded bonds are reflected as being augmented by general governmental sources in the body of the AUIR document. General governmental sources are those existing sales tax revenues and other state shared revenues, or ad valorem allocations at the Board’s discretion. Note that all projects identified within the “Category A” facilities have identified funding for the improvement. When funding sources are not identified, CIE Policy 2.9 provides the Board five action options to address the situation by. 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 1539 Attachment: Staff Report-2020 AUIR_post-CM Briefing FNL (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) PL20200001297/CPSP-2020-1 2020 AUIR/CIE STAFF REPORT ‒ Collier County Planning Commission Hearing of October 15 pg. 7 1. Removing facility improvements or new facilities that exceed the adopted level of service for the growth during the next five (5) fiscal years from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements via Growth Management Plan amendment; 2. Removing facility improvements or new facilities that reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility but do not provide additional facility capacity from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements via Growth Management Plan amendment; 3. Transferring funds, where feasible, from a funded non-CIE capital project to fund an identified deficient CIE public facility, and reflecting the resulting revisions in the annual CIE update; 4. Lowering the adopted level of service standard via Growth Management Plan amendment for the facility for which funding cannot be obtained; and, 5. Not issuing development orders that would continue to cause a deficiency based on the facility's adopted level of service standard. All of “Category B” facility improvements require loans from general governmental sources to meet the necessary revenue (option 3 above). Additionally, to fund the proposed five-year improvements contained within this year’s CIE update requires the Board to utilize Debt Service. The informational tables detailing the revenue and debt service for the AUIR Divisions/Departments for the five-year capital improvement planning period, as well as the long-term debt financing schedules, are provided within Appendix I of the AUIR/CIE booklet. RECOMMENDATION: That the Collier County Planning Commission in the form of recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners: 1. To accept and recommend approval of the attached document as the 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities. 2. To accept and recommend approval to the BCC the “Category A, B and C” facilities relative to projects and revenue sources, with “Category A” facilities set forth for inclusion in the Schedule of Capital Improvements of the annual CIE update and amendment. 3. To find that no inconsistencies are contained within the School District’s Capital Improvement Plan compared to the other planned capital improvements within the AUIR or CIE. 4. To consider alternative levels of service for individual components of the AUIR, where deemed appropriate. 5. To recommend adoption of the CIE Schedule of Capital Improvements update, and by reference, the School District’s Capital Improvement Plan and the District Facilities Work Program. 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 1540 Attachment: Staff Report-2020 AUIR_post-CM Briefing FNL (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT ON PUBLIC FACILITIES 2020 CATEGORY “A” FACILITIES (Concurrency Regulated) 1. County Arterial & Collector Roads & Bridges 2. Stormwater Management System 3. Potable Water System 4. Wastewater Collection & Treatment Systems 5. Solid Waste Disposal 6. Collier County Schools − Capital Improvement Plan 7. Parks and Recreation Facilities − Community Park Land − Regional Park Land 8. CIE Amendment Submittals for Category A Facilities − Exhibit “A”, Capital Improvements (Next 5 Years) − Appendix “H”, Capital Improvements (Future Years 6 ‒ 10) Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 1 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1541 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COUNTY ROADS & BRIDGE FACILITIES CONTENTS •COUNTY ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROADS & BRIDGES − SUMMARY •ATTACHMENT A: FIVE YEAR REVENUES ‒ PREVIOUS vs. CURRENT AUIR •ATTACHMENT B: TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT •ATTACHMENT C: PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL VOLUME FROM PREVIOUS YEAR ‒ MAP •ATTACHMENT D: PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION 5-YEAR WORK PROGRAM •ATTACHMENT E: ROAD FINANCING PLAN UPDATE •ATTACHMENT F: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DATABASE TABLE •ATTACHMENT G: DEFICIENT ROADS REPORT UPDATE •ATTACHMENT H: PROJECTED DEFICIENT ROADS ‒ MAP •ATTACHMENT I: TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT AREA REPORT – EAST CENTRAL TCMA AND NORTHWEST TCMA •ATTACHMENT J: ACTIVITY REPORT ON CONTINUING PROJECTS UNDER CONTRACT Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 2 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1542 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Facility Type: County Arterial and Collector Roads (Category A) Level of Service Standard: Variable - "D" or "E" Unit Cost: Variable (Average = $6,005,000/ lane mile) Per Current Approved Transportation Impact Fee Recommended Work Program FY 21-25 $653,634,000 Recommended Revenues FY21-25 $653,634,000 Five-Year Surplus or (Deficit)$0 1. Existing Revenue Sources: A. Current Revenues CIE FY 21-25 Sales Tax $190,843,000 Gas Taxes $118,552,000 Impact Fees / COA $77,460,000 General Fund 001/111 $61,623,000 Grants/Reimbursements/DCAs/Interest $55,247,000 Unfunded Needs $100,137,000 SUB TOTAL $603,862,000 Carry Forward $59,834,000 * Less 5% Required by Law ($10,062,000) TOTAL $653,634,000 2. Supplemental Revenue Sources: A. Alternative I None Required B. Alternative II None Required Recommended Action: \ 1. Design - 25 months 2. Right-of-Way - 4 years 3. Construction - 30-36 months 2020 AUIR FACILITY SUMMARY That the BCC direct the County Manager or his designee to include County road projects appearing on "Proposed Transportation Five-Year Work Program," (Attachment D), as detailed in the "Collier County Transportation Planning Database" (Attachment F), in the next Annual CIE Update and Amendment with the application of revenues outlined on the Road Financing Plan (Attachment E) to establish statutorily required financial feasibility of the CIE. *Carry Forward includes the budgeted FY21 Carry forward and does not include project funding encumbered in prior fiscal years. The actual Carry Forward number that includes the roll of encumbrances is not available until after October 1, 2020. Attachment J provides a snapshot of prior year FY20 project activity as of June 30, 2020 for continuing projects. Project costs are generally paid out over the following schedule for phases (average time for payout): Note: FY 2020 Revenues based on current adopted Impact Fee Schedule, projected gas tax revenues, budgeted general fund transfer, and approved grants and developer contribution agreements. Expenditures are based on current unit cost. 5 YEAR PROJECT DURATION AFTER 2 YEAR PLANNING CYCLE IS COMPLETE DESIGN RIGHT‐OF‐WAY CONSTRUCTION 12345 Page 3 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1543 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Attachment "A"*Charts do not include a Carry Forward or negative Revenue Reserve.77,460,00013%190,843,00032%118,552,00020%61,623,00010%55,247,0009%100,137,00016%2021 ‐2025 (Total $592,712,000)Impact FeesSales TaxesGas TaxesGeneral FundGrants / Reimb /InterestUnfunded needs$0$50,000,000$100,000,000$150,000,000$200,000,000$250,000,000Impact Fees Sales Taxes Gas Taxes General Fund Grants / Reimb /InterestUnfunded needsFunding Source Trends: Five Year Projections2019‐20232020‐20242021‐202577,000,00015%183,692,00037%119,000,00024%65,613,00013%26,243,0005%32,268,0006%2020 ‐2024 (Total $503,816,000)Impact FeesSales TaxesGas TaxesGeneral FundGrants / Reimb /InterestUnfunded needsPage 4 of 1339.A.3.bPacket Pg. 1544Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Attachment “B” TRANSPORTATION EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT – 2020 Objective To provide the Board of County Commissioners with an “existing conditions” analysis of the transportation system in Collier County. Purpose This analysis is provided to assist in the preparation of the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), and more specifically to assist in the determination of adequate (transportation) public facilities and to guide budgeting and project programming in the CIE. Considerations: The traffic counts are collected on an annual, seasonal, or quarterly basis, and are factored as needed to determine a peak hour peak directional volume. The factors used include a directional factor and a seasonal factor that varies depending on the week that the traffic count was conducted. The Level of Service (LOS) threshold volumes are calculated using ARTPLAN and HIGHPLAN software. Measured volume is based on the 250th highest hour, which essentially equates to the 100th highest hour after omitting February and March data, consistent with the Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code provisions. The remaining capacity is based on the difference between the LOS threshold volume and the calculated existing plus trip bank volume. The LOS for each roadway segment is identified in Attachment “F” for the current year. Additionally, traffic volumes are forecasted for future years which yields an estimated “Year Expected Deficient” that is used in the planning and programming of future improvements. The Existing LOS and the forecasted LOS are expressions of operating conditions during the peak hours of the peak seasonal day, which corresponds to the same time period as the adopted minimum acceptable LOS Standards in the Growth Management Plan. While the adopted LOS standard and evaluated condition must be expressed for the peak period, it is important to recognize that the roadway’s LOS will be better during most other portions of the day, and especially during non-peak season periods. The AUIR deals with system capacity and maintaining the established LOS through our Concurrency Management System. As the system expands, there is a growing need to focus our attention on the condition of existing facilities and the demand for Operations and Maintenance (O&M) funding. Our bridges and culverts are approaching or are at their 50-year life-cycle. Over 250 additional lane miles of urban and rural, arterial, and local roads have been added to the county system for maintenance since 2000. Historical funding for O&M has not addressed industry standards for anticipated life-cycles which are 6 to 8 years for urban roadways and 12 to 15 years for rural roadways. Gas taxes are already at the maximum allowed by statute. Complicating this issue is the reliance on impact fees as directed by our “growth pays for growth” policy which can only be used to add additional capacity or new lane miles to the system. The prior aggressive program to add capacity allowed existing system mileage to be rebuilt and the mileage to be maintained throughout the construction cycle by the contractor. Volatile impact fee rates and revenues alone cannot sustain a multi-year capital program that provides improvements concurrent with the impacts of development. Capacity expansion projects require a multi-year funding plan to meet the 7-year construction cycle that includes: planning, design, ROW acquisition, permitting and construction. LOS standards already set at the lowest acceptable levels of “D” or “E”. Page 5 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1545 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Observations Of the 129 stations (covering 141 unique Segment ID’s) collecting traffic counts in the 2019/2020 program, the average increase in measured overall volume between 2019 and 2020 was 7.50% system-wide. By comparison, the average increase between 2018 and 2019 reported in last year’s AUIR was 2.13%. When reviewing only higher capacity, multi-lane roadway segments in the County’s network (only those with capacity over 1,000 vehicles per hour in the peak direction during the peak period) an average increase of 7.89% was experienced over 2019. For the 2019/2020 traffic counts, 15 segments reflected a decrease over the previous year, 75 segments reflected an increase over the previous year, and 51 remained unchanged (+/-5%). Listed below are the numbers and corresponding percentages for the count stations, including the percentage changes between 2019 and 2020: 13.5% (19 segments) show an increase greater than 20% compared to 2019 17.7% (25 segments) show an increase of 10-20% compared to 2019 22.0% (31 segments) show an increase of up to 5-10% compared to 2019 36.2% (51 segments) show an insignificant change of -5% to 5% compared to 2019 5.7% ( 8 segments) show a decrease of 5-10% compared to 2019 5.0% ( 7 segment) show a decrease of 10-20% compared to 2019 0% ( 0 segments) show a decrease of greater than 20% compared to 2019 Note: Some count stations experienced significant year-to-year fluctuations due to construction avoidance. Several segments of State roads are predicted to be deficient when “trip bank” reserved capacity trips are added to existing volumes. Projected deficient segments on the East Tamiami Trail are located within the Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA), and development impacting these segments is subject to the TCEA’s mitigation strategies. Other potentially deficient State road segments are currently programmed in the FDOT Work Program with improvements intended to add capacity to resolve any potentially deficient conditions. Although traffic data collected by Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) on the segments of I-75 between each interchange is not needed for the AUIR, because the change in mainline volumes correlates with changes in interchange ramp volumes, the mainline volumes are monitored/evaluated each year for informational purposes. A review of the most recent average annual growth rates for the last 3 and 5-year timeframes depicts an increase in traffic along all mainline segments of I-75 in the urban area as shown in Table 1. Page 6 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1546 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) TABLE 1: I-75 Historical Annual Average Daily (AADT) Traffic Volumes (2-Way) Source: Florida Department of Transportation Page 7 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1547 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Randall Blvd Everglades BlvdDesoto BlvdRattlesnake Hammock Logan BLVDSanta Barbara BLVDCounty Barn Immokalee Rd Orange Blossom Thomasson Dr Wilson BlvdEverglades BlvdCamp Keais RdAve Ma r iaBlvdBonita Beach Rd Wiggins Pass SR 29Immokalee Rd Collier BlvdSan Marco RDLivingston RdTamiami Trail NDavis Blvd Pine Ridge Rd Vanderbilt Beach Rd COUNTY LINE RDVanderbilt DrGolden Gate PKWYOld 41S 1st STAirport Pulling RdGoodlette-Frank RdRadio Rd Green Blvd Golden Gate Blvd W Bayshore DrCollier BlvdOil Well Rd ATTACHMENT C Percentage Change In Peak Hour Directional Volume From 2019 0 1 2 3 4 50.5 Miles µ Growth Management DepartmentTransportation Planning SR 82 S 1st StLake Trafford Rd N 15th STWestclox St W Main StSR 29 INSET MAP §¨¦75 §¨¦75 §¨¦75 $+41 $+41 $+41 !(951 !(951 !(951 !(846 !(846 $+41 GIS Mapping: Beth Yang, AICP Growth Management Department Date: July, 2020GulfofMexico Lake Trafford !(29 !(29 LEE COUNTY -This map evaluates changes in measured background trips; not trip bank changes. Legend Percentage Change In Peak Hour Directional Volume From 2019 5%-10% Increase From 2019 10%-20% Increase From 2019 >20% Increase From 2019 < +/- 5% Change From 2019 5%-10% Decrease From 2019 10%-20% Decrease From 2019 >20% Decrease From 2019 Page 8 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1548 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Project Name Project FY 21-25 # SUMMARY OF PROJECTS Amount 60168 Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd-16th 600 R 94,700 C 95,300 60201 Pine Ridge Rd (Livingston to I75)1,500 D 42,500 D/C/M 44,000 66066 11 Bridge Replacements 33,100 D/C/M PR 33,100 60147 Randall/Immokalee Road Intersection 2,500 R 12,600 C/M 15,100 60190 Airport Rd Vanderbilt Bch Rd to Immokalee Rd 3,100 D/R 14,800 C/M 17,900 60215 Triangle Blvd/Price St 6,800 R/C 6,800 60212 New Golden Gate Bridges (10)15,500 D/C 6,100 D/C 27,000 D/C 8,600 D/C 57,200 60241 16th Street NE Bridge 11,800 D/C/M 11,800 60228 Sidewalks 1,416 D/C 2,281 D/C 1,251 C 4,895 C 9,843 60198 Veterans Memorial PH I and PH 2 7,000 D/A/C 7,000 60198 Veterans Memorial PH II HS to US41 1,000 R 2,700 R/D 13,400 C/M 17,100 60199 Vanderbilt Beach Rd (US41 to E of Goodlette)13,500 D/C 13,500 60219 Whippoorwill 700 C 700 60129 Wilson Benfield Ext (Lord's Way to City Gate N)5,000 R/A 1,000 R/A 1,000 R/A 1,000 R/A 1,000 R/A 9,000 TBD Santa Barbara/Logan Turnlanes 879 D 7,879 C 8,758 60144 Oil Well (Everglades to Oil Well Grade)2,000 A 300 A 300 A 300 A 300 A 3,200 33563 Tiger Grant 13,000 C 13,000 70167 Business Center (City Gate)10,250 A 7,400 C 9,500 C 27,150 68056 Collier Blvd (Green to GG Main Canal)38,200 R/D/C 38,200 60065 Randall Blvd/Immk to Oil Well 8th to Everglades 250 R 3,000 D 3,250 TBD Goodlette Rd (VBR to Immokalee Rd)2,309 D 634 A 9,366 A 12,309 TBD Green Blvd (Santa Barbara Blvd to Sunshine)500 S 500 60229 Wilson Blvd (GG Blvd to Immokalee)7,100 D/R 20,500 C 27,600 TBD Vanderbilt Bch Rd (16th to Everglades)2,800 D/R/M 11,250 R/A 5,000 R/A 19,050 TBD Poinciana Professional Park 300 C 300 TBD Immokalee Rd (Livingston to Logan)1,000 S/A 1,000 60016 Intersections Improvements Shoulder Widening 217 300 300 550 400 1,767 60226 16th Ave (13th St SW to 23rd St SW) Shoulders 1,350 C 1,350 60227 Corkscrew Rd (Lee County Line) Shoulders 1,200 C 1,200 TBD Randall Blvd (Immk Rd to Desoto Blvd)Shoulder 100 DC 1,450 C 1,550 60233 Corkscrew Rd (Lee Cnty Line to SR82 Curve)1,400 C 1,400 60242 Randall Blvd at Everglades Blvd 625 DC 350 C 975 TBD Immk Rd at Northbrooke Dr/Tarpon Bay Blvd DC 1,000 DC 1,000 60237 Everglades Blvd (Oil Well to Immk Rd)Shoulder 1,600 D/C 1,600 60073 Davis Mystic DCA Reimb 500 500 Contingency - Total 109,858 144,481 131,310 75,708 42,645 504,002 Operations Improvements/Programs FY 21-25 66066 Bridge Repairs/Improvements 2,500 6,000 6,500 6,500 2,500 24,000 60130 Wall/Barrier Replacement 456 250 250 250 250 1,456 60131 Road Resurfacing 111/101 10,000 6,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 40,000 60128 Limerock Road Conversion 111 - 60077 Striping and Marking 800 800 800 800 800 4,000 60172 Traffic Ops Upgrades/Enhancements 732 725 725 725 25 2,932 60189 LED Replacement Program - 60118 Countywide Pathways/Sidewalks Non PIL /LAP 565 300 750 750 750 3,115 69081 Pathways/Sidewalks Bike Lanes Maint/Enhan - 60037 Asset Mgmt 251 100 100 100 100 651 60146 TMC Relocation Fund 310 - 60197 RM Facility Fund 310 500 500 500 500 500 2,500 69331-339 District 1,2,3,4,5,6 Sidewalk PIL - 60191 Lap Design Phase - Subtotal Operations Improvements/Programs 15,804 14,675 17,625 17,625 12,925 78,654 60066 Congestion Mgmt Fare - 60240 Traffic Calming 50 D/C 50 D/C 50 D/C 50 D/C 50 D/C 250 60085 TIS Review 250 S 250 S 250 S 250 S 250 S 1,250 60088 PUD Monitoring - 60109 Planning Consulting 500 S 500 S 500 S 500 S 500 S 2,500 60163 Traffic Studies 300 S 300 S 300 S 300 S 300 S 1,500 60171 Multi Project - Transfer to Fund 325 STO - Advance/Repay to 325 STW 11,318 11,318 Impact Fee Refunds 250 250 250 250 1,000 Debt Service Payments 13,317 13,131 13,136 13,576 53,160 Total Funding Request All Funds 151,397 173,637 163,421 108,259 56,920 653,634 REVENUES FY 21-25 Sales Tax 48,782 95,781 32,385 13,895 - 190,843 Impact Fees Revenue 15,460 15,500 15,500 15,500 15,500 77,460 COA Revenue - Gas Tax Revenue 23,052 23,500 23,750 24,000 24,250 118,552 DCA 534 534 Grants/Reimbursements*19,434 4,928 9,800 - 6,806 40,968 Grant from 711 60200 - Transfer 001 to 310 9,067 9,389 9,389 9,389 9,389 46,623 Transfer 111 to 310 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 15,000 Interest Gas Tax-Impact Fees 2,245 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,245 Carry Forward 313-310-Impact Fees 59,834 59,834 Potential Debt Funding/Unfunded Needs 56,637 43,500 - 100,137 Expected FEMA Reimbursement 8,500 8,500 Revenue Reserve 5%(1,962) (2,025) (2,025) (2,025) (2,025) (10,062) Total Revenues 179,446 159,573 149,436 108,259 56,920 653,634 Gross Surplus/Shortfall 28,049 (14,064) (13,985) - - - Cummulative Surplus/Shortfall 28,049 13,985 - - - Project 16th St Bridge 4,934 11 Bridge Immk-CR846 2,592 Tiger Grant 13,000 VBR US41 to Goodlette 4,214 Collier Blvd GG to Green 1,600 Goodlette VBR to Imm 2,750 Pine Ridge Livingston 5,450 Airport VBR to Immk 1,500 4,928 Total 19,434 4,928 9,800 - 6,806 Key: A = Adv Construction / S = Study / D = Design M = Mitigation / C = Construction / R = ROW 60168 LS = Landscape / L = Litigation / I = Inspection 60201 AM = Access Mgmt / LP = SIB Loan Repayment 66066 @ = See separate supplemental maps 60147 **The 5-cent Local Option Fuel Tax is earmarked towards debt service, bridges, and intersection improvements. 60190 60215 Sales Tax Projects:FY 21-25 60212 Vanderbilt Beach Ext 74,000 74,000 60212.1 Pine Ridge Rd (Livingston Intersection Imp) 1,500 21,500 23,000 TBD 11 Bridge Replacements 33,000 33,000 60228 Immk/Randall Rd Intersection 7,000 7,000 Airport Rd VBR to Immk Rd 4,000 4,000 Triangle Blvd/Price St 6,000 6,000 New Golden Gate Bridges (11) 15,500 2,634 18,134 47th Street Bridge 9,000 9,000 16th Street Bridge 6,866 6,866 Sidewalks 1,416 2,281 1,251 4,895 9,843 Total 48,782 95,781 32,385 13,895 - 190,843 Attachment D FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY22 Amount FY21 Amount Roads & Bridges 2021 5 Year Work Program (Dollars shown in Thousands) FY25 Amount FY24 Amount FY23 Amount Page 9 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1549 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) FY 21FY 22FY 23FY 24FY 25 5 Year TotalProject/Program Commitments138,080,000 160,256,000 150,035,000 94,433,000 56,670,000 599,474,000 Existing Debt Service13,317,000 13,131,000 13,136,000 13,576,000 - 53,160,000 Impact Fee Refunds- 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,000,000 Total Expenses151,397,000 173,637,000 163,421,000 108,259,000 56,920,000 653,634,000 - Sales Tax Revenue48,782,000 95,781,000 32,385,000 13,895,000 - 190,843,000 Impact Fee Revenue / COA Revenue15,460,000 15,500,000 15,500,000 15,500,000 15,500,000 77,460,000 DCA534,000 - - - - 534,000 Gas Tax Revenue23,052,000 23,500,000 23,750,000 24,000,000 24,250,000 118,552,000 Debt Svc General Fund Transfer9,067,000 9,389,000 9,389,000 9,389,000 9,389,000 46,623,000 Transfer in from Fund 1113,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 15,000,000 Interest Gas Tax/Impact Fee2,245,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 5,245,000 Grants/Reimbursements *19,434,000 13,428,000 9,800,000 - 6,806,000 49,468,000 Unfunded needs- - 56,637,000 43,500,000 - 100,137,000 Revenue Reserve ( 5% Budgeted by Statue)(1,962,000) (2,025,000) (2,025,000) (2,025,000) (2,025,000) (10,062,000) Total Revenues119,612,000 159,573,000 149,436,000 108,259,000 56,920,000 593,800,000 Carry Forward (Surplus or Shortfall) **59,834,000 - - - - 59,834,000 Additional Roll Forward- Fiscal Year Balance (Surplus or Shortfall)28,049,000 (14,064,000) (13,985,000) - - - Cumulative Fiscal Year Balance (Surplus or Shortfall)28,049,000 13,985,000 - - - * Includes programmed FDOT Grants and Naples Reserve DCAAttachment "E"Road Financing Plan Update** Carry Forward includes the budgeted FY21 Carry forward and does not include project funding encumbered (roll over) in prior fiscal years to be paid out over the following schedule for phases (average time for payout): This Carry Forward number that includes the roll of encumbrances will not be available until after October 1, 2020 but attachment J provides a listing of major projects previously budgeted with carry forward funding anticipated to complete the project/phases.Revenues based on current adopted Impact Fee Schedule, projected gas tax revenues, budgeted general fund transfer, and approved grants and developer contribution agreements.Page 10 of 1339.A.3.bPacket Pg. 1550Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Attachment "F"57 58 61 63 64 65 66Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) Based on Adopted LOS, Trip Bank and Traffic CountsPeak 2019 2020 2019 201920202020TrafficHour 1Peak Peak 2020 20202020 Counts + 2020w/TB CountsTrip BankPeak DirHourHourNet PercentTotal Counts + Trip Bank Counts +LYearYearExist Cnt. Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir Change ChangeTrip Trip BankRemainingTrip BankO Expected ExpectedID# Road# Link From To Road Sta. Std*Dir Volume Volume Volume In Volume In VolumeBankVolume Capacity V/C S Deficient Deficient1456791011121330314243818283848586871.0 CR31 Airport RoadImmokalee RoadVanderbilt Beach Road 4D 554 D N 2,200 1190 1690 500 42.02% 39 1729 471 78.6% C2.1 CR31 Airport RoadVanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Drive 6D 599 E N 3,000 2290 2330 40 1.75% 43 2373 627 79.1% D2.2 CR31 Airport RoadOrange Blossom Drive Pine Ridge Road6D 503 E N 3,000 2010 2230 220 10.95% 52 2282 718 76.1% D3.0 CR31 Airport RoadPine Ridge RoadGolden Gate Parkway 6D 502 E N 3,000 2240 2230(10) -0.45%14 2244 756 74.8% C4.0 CR31 Airport RoadGolden Gate Parkway Radio Road6D 533 E N 2,800 2190 2200 10 0.46% 0 2200 600 78.6% D5.0 CR31 Airport RoadRadio RoadDavis Boulevard6D 553 E N 2,800 2010 2170 160 7.96% 0 2170 630 77.5% D6.0 CR31 Airport RoadDavis BoulevardUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) 6D 552 E S 2,700 1600 1650 50 3.13% 65 1715 985 63.5% C7.0Bayshore DriveUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) Thomasson Drive4D 521 D S 1,800 640 660 20 3.13% 104 764 1036 42.4% B8.0 CR 865 Bonita Beach Road West of Vanderbilt Drive Hickory Boulevard4D 653 D E 1,900 1050 1080 30 2.86% 0 1080 820 56.8% C9.0Carson RoadLake Trafford RoadImmokalee Drive2U 610 D N 600 300 290(10) -3.33%5 295 305 49.2% B10.0County Barn Road Davis BoulevardRattlesnake Hammock Road 2U 519 D S 900 380 480 100 26.32% 108 588 312 65.3% C11.0 CR29 CR 29US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Everglades City2U 582A D S 1,000 160 160 0 0.00% 0 160 840 16.0% B12.0 SR84 Davis BoulevardUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) Airport Road6D 558 E E 2,700 1420 1440 20 1.41% 30 1470 1230 54.4% C13.0 SR84 Davis BoulevardAirport RoadLakewood Boulevard 4D 559 D E 2,000 1330 1440 110 8.27% 2 1442 558 72.1% C14.0 SR84 Davis BoulevardLakewood Boulevard County Barn Road4D 658 D E 2,000 1550 1500(50) -3.23%61 1561 439 78.1% C15.0 SR84 Davis BoulevardCounty Barn RoadSanta Barbara Boulevard 4D 538 D E 2,200 1410 1420 10 0.71% 139 1559 641 70.9% C16.1 SR84 Davis BoulevardSanta Barbara Boulevard Radio Road6D 560 E E 3,300 740 810 70 9.46% 158 968 2332 29.3% B16.2 SR84 Davis BoulevardRadio RoadCollier Boulevard6D 601 E W 3,300 1190 1290 100 8.40% 325 1615 1685 48.9% B17.0 CR876 Golden Gate Boulevard Collier BoulevardWilson Boulevard4D 531 D E 2,300 1730 1910 180 10.40% 0 1910 390 83.0% D203018.0 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road 6D 530 E E 2,700 1230 1560 330 26.83% 13 1573 1127 58.3% C19.0 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road6D 507 E E 3,550 2860 2990 130 4.55% 1 2991 559 84.3% D202920.1 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Airport RoadLivingston Road6D 508 E E 3,550 2680 2950 270 10.07% 17 2967 583 83.6% D202720.2 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Livingston RoadI-756D 691 E E 3,550 3020 3350 330 10.93% 0 3350 200 94.4% D 2023 202321.0 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway I-75Santa Barbara Boulevard 6D 509 E E 3,300 2400 2240(160) -6.67%14 2254 1046 68.3% C22.0 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard4D 605 D * E 1,980 1670 1730 60 3.59% 60 1790 190 90.4% D202623.0 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Immokalee RoadVanderbilt Beach Road 2U 594 D N 1,000 820 910 90 10.98% 0 910 90 91.0% D 2025 202524.1 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Drive 4D 595 E N 2,400 1380 1490 110 7.97% 73 1563 837 65.1% C24.2 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Orange Blossom Drive Pine Ridge Road6D 581 E N 2,400 1560 1650 90 5.77% 8 1658 742 69.1% C25.0 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge RoadGolden Gate Parkway 6D 505 E N 3,000 1960 1970 10 0.51% 16 1986 1014 66.2% C26.0 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Golden Gate Parkway US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 6D 504 E S 2,700 1960 2680 720 36.73% 0 2680 20 99.3% E 2021 202127.0Green BoulevardSanta Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard2U 642 D E 900 710 750 40 5.63% 10 760 140 84.4% D202929.0Gulfshore Drive111th AvenueVanderbilt Beach Road 2U 583a D N 800 300 310 10 3.33% 0 310 490 38.8% B30.1 CR951 Collier Boulevard Immokalee RoadVanderbilt Beach Road 6D 655 E N 3,000 1850 1880 30 1.62% 517 2397 603 79.9% D203030.2 CR951 Collier Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road Golden Gate Boulevard 6D 584 E S 3,000 1260 1360 100 7.94% 93 1453 1547 48.4% B31.1 CR951 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Boulevard Pine Ridge Road6D 536 D N 3,000 1850 1990 140 7.57% 85 2075 925 69.2% C31.2 CR951 Collier Boulevard Pine Ridge RoadGreen Boulevard6D 536 D N 3,000 1850 1990 140 7.57% 112 2102 898 70.1% C32.1 CR951 Collier Boulevard Green BoulevardGolden Gate Pwky4D 525 D N 2,300 1360 1730 370 27.21% 49 1779 521 77.3% C32.2 CR951 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate PwkyGolden Gate Main Canal 4D 607 D N 2,300 1360 1860 500 36.76% 241 2101 199 91.3% D202532.3 CR951 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Main Canal I-758D 607 E N 3,600 1360 1860 500 36.76% 318 2178 1422 60.5% C33.0 SR951 Collier Boulevard I-75Davis Boulevard8D 573 E N 3,600 3020 3560 540 17.88% 313 3873(273)107.6% F 2021 Existing34.0 CR951 Collier Boulevard Davis BoulevardRattlesnake Hammock Road 6D 602 E N 3,000 1940 2130 190 9.79% 441 2571 429 85.7% D203035.0 CR951 Collier Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 6D 603 E N 3,200 2000 2060 60 3.00% 337 2397 803 74.9% C36.1 SR951 Collier Boulevard US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Wal-Mart Driveway6D 557 E N 2,500 1540 2150 610 39.61% 201 2351 149 94.0% D202436.2 SR951 Collier Boulevard Wal-Mart DrivewayManatee Road4D 557 D N 2,000 1540 1920 380 24.68% 158 2078(78)103.9% E 2023 Existing37.0 SR951 Collier Boulevard Manatee RoadMainsail Drive4D 627 D N 2,200 1680 1690 10 0.60% 211 1901 299 86.4% D202938.0 SR951 Collier Boulevard Mainsail DriveMarco Island Bridge4D 627 D N 2,200 1680 1690 10 0.60% 33 1723 477 78.3% C39.0 CR846 111th Avenue N.Gulfshore DriveVanderbilt Drive2U 585 D E 700 312 290(22) -7.05%0 290 410 41.4% B40.0 CR846 111th Avenue N.Vanderbilt DriveUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 613 D E 900 448 560 112 25.00% 0 560 340 62.2% C41.1 CR846 Immokalee RoadUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road 6D 566 E E 3,100 2110 2220 110 5.21% 3 2223 877 71.7% C41.2 CR846 Immokalee RoadGoodlette-Frank Road Airport Road6D 625 E E 3,100 2650 2760 110 4.15% 9 2769 331 89.3% D 2024 202442.1 CR846 Immokalee RoadAirport RoadLivingston Road6D 567 E E 3,100 2780 2360(420) -15.11%11 2371 729 76.5% D42.2 CR846 Immokalee RoadLivingston RoadI-756D/8D 679 E E 3,500 2550 3020 470 18.43% 30 3050 450 87.1% D202843.1 CR846 Immokalee RoadI-75Logan Boulevard6D/8D 701 E E 3,500 2360 2620 260 11.02% 490 3110 390 88.9% D202543.2 CR846 Immokalee RoadLogan BoulevardCollier Boulevard6D 656 E E 3,200 1930 2030 100 5.18% 735 2765 435 86.4% D202744.0 CR846 Immokalee RoadCollier BoulevardWilson Boulevard6D 674 E E 3,300 2050 2480 430 20.98% 725 3205 95 97.1% E202145.0 CR846 Immokalee RoadWilson BoulevardOil Well Road6D 675 E E 3,300 2460 2310(150) -6.10%465 2775 525 84.1% D202846.0 CR846 Immokalee RoadOil Well RoadSR 292U 672 D E 900 460 480 20 4.35% 178 658 242 73.1% C47.0Lake Trafford Road Carson RdSR 292U 609 D E 800 460 500 40 8.70% 53 553 247 69.1% C48.0Logan BoulevardVanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road2U 587 D N 1,000 640 620(20) -3.13%87 707 293 70.7% C49.0Logan BoulevardPine Ridge RoadGreen Boulevard4D 588 D S 1,900 1500 1530 30 2.00% 50 1580 320 83.2% D202950.0Logan BoulevardImmokalee RoadVanderbilt Beach Road 2U 644 D N 1,000 600 670 70 11.67% 34 704 296 70.4% CMinPage 11 of 1339.A.3.bPacket Pg. 1551Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Attachment "F"57 58 61 63 64 65 66Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) Based on Adopted LOS, Trip Bank and Traffic CountsPeak 2019 2020 2019 201920202020TrafficHour 1Peak Peak 2020 20202020 Counts + 2020w/TB CountsTrip BankPeak DirHourHourNet PercentTotal Counts + Trip Bank Counts +LYearYearExist Cnt. Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir Change ChangeTrip Trip BankRemainingTrip BankO Expected ExpectedID# Road# Link From To Road Sta. Std*Dir Volume Volume Volume In Volume In VolumeBankVolume Capacity V/C S Deficient Deficient145679101112133031424381828384858687Min51.0 CR881 Livingston RoadImperial StreetImmokalee Road6/4D 673 D N 3,000 1230 1410 180 14.63% 86 1496 1504 49.9% B52.0 CR881 Livingston RoadImmokalee RoadVanderbilt Beach Road 6D 576 E N 3,100 1800 2220 420 23.33% 22 2242 858 72.3% C53.0 CR881 Livingston RoadVanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road6D 575 E N 3,100 1500 1560 60 4.00% 0 1560 1540 50.3% B54.0 CR881 Livingston RoadPine Ridge RoadGolden Gate Parkway 6D 690 E N 3,100 1490 1330(160) -10.74%50 1380 1720 44.5% B55.0 CR881 Livingston RoadGolden Gate Parkway Radio Road6D 687 E N 3,000 1490 1820 330 22.15% 23 1843 1157 61.4% C58.0N. 1st StreetNew Market RoadSR-29 (Main Street)2U 590 D N 900 680 650(30) -4.41%24 674 226 74.9% C59.0New Market Road Broward StreetSR 292U 612 D E 900 540 570 30 5.56% 28 598 302 66.4% C61.0Camp KeaisOil Well RoadImmokalee Road2U 626A D S 1,000 280 280 0 0.00% 211 491 509 49.1% B62.0 CR887 Old US 41Lee County LineUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 547 D N 1,000 1070 1120 50 4.67% 9 1129(129)112.9% F Existing Existing63.0 CR896 Seagate DriveCrayton RoadUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) 4D 511 D E 1,700 1030 990(40) -3.88%0 990 710 58.2% C64.0 CR896 Pine Ridge RoadUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road 6D 512 E E 2,800 1910 1950 40 2.09% 16 1966 834 70.2% C65.0 CR896 Pine Ridge RoadGoodlette-Frank Road Shirley Street6D 514 E E 2,800 2000 2430 430 21.50% 19 2449 351 87.5% D202766.0 CR896 Pine Ridge RoadShirley StreetAirport Road6D 515 E E 2,800 2910 3230 320 11.00% 20 3250(450)116.1% F Existing Existing67.1 CR896 Pine Ridge RoadAirport RoadLivingston Road6D 526 E E 3,900 2980 3540 560 18.79% 17 3557 343 91.2% D 2025 202567.2 CR896 Pine Ridge RoadLivingston RoadI-756D 628 E E 3,900 3020 3130 110 3.64% 70 3200 700 82.1% D68.0 CR896 Pine Ridge RoadI-75Logan Boulevard6D 600 E E 2,800 2160 2400 240 11.11% 126 2526 274 90.2% D202669.0 CR856 Radio RoadAirport RoadLivingston Road4D 544 D E 1,800 1180 1160(20) -1.69%57 1217 583 67.6% C70.0 CR856 Radio RoadLivingston RoadSanta Barbara Boulevard 4D 527 D E 1,800 1120 1440 320 28.57% 30 1470 330 81.7% D71.0 CR856 Radio RoadSanta Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard4D 685 D W 1,800 710 690(20) -2.82%130 820 980 45.6% B72.0 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Charlemagne Boulevard 4D 516 D E 1,800 1030 1080 50 4.85% 125 1205 595 66.9% C73.0 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Charlemagne Boulevard County Barn Road4D 517 D E 1,800 760 840 80 10.53% 99 939 861 52.2% B74.0 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road County Barn RoadSanta Barbara Boulevard 4D 534 D E 1,900 720 800 80 11.11% 85 885 1015 46.6% B75.0 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard6D 518 E W 2,900 590 740 150 25.42% 172 912 1988 31.4% B76.0Santa Barbara Boulevard Green BoulevardGolden Gate Parkway 4D 529 D N 2,100 1620 1590(30) -1.85%0 1590 510 75.7% C77.0Santa Barbara Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road6D 528 E N 3,100 1960 2240 280 14.29% 54 2294 806 74.0% C78.0Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio RoadDavis Boulevard6D 537 E N 3,100 1420 1480 60 4.23% 255 1735 1365 56.0% C79.0Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis BoulevardRattlesnake-Hammock Road 6D 702 E S 3,100 980 940(40) -4.08%252 1192 1908 38.5% B80.0 SR29 SR 29US 41 (Tamiami Trail) CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr) 2U 615A D N 900 140 150 10 7.14% 0 150 750 16.7% B81.0 SR29 SR 29CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr) I-752U 615A D N 900 140 150 10 7.14% 0 150 750 16.7% B82.0 SR29 SR 29I-75Oil Well Road2U 615A D N 900 140 150 10 7.14% 67 217 683 24.1% B83.0 SR29 SR 29Oil Well RoadCR 29A South2U 665A D N 900 410 420 10 2.44% 79 499 401 55.4% B84.0 SR29 SR 29CR 29A South9th Street4D 664 D W 1,700 590 620 30 5.08% 132 752 948 44.2% B85.0 SR29 SR 299th StreetCR 29A North2U 663 D S 900 620 650 30 4.84% 74 724 176 80.4% D86.0 SR29 SR 29CR 29A NorthSR 822U 663 D S 900 620 650 30 4.84% 68 718 182 79.8% D87.0 SR29 SR 29Hendry County Line SR 822U 591A D S 800 380 390 10 2.63% 10 400 400 50.0% B88.0 SR82 SR 82Lee County LineSR 292U 661A D S 800 750 790 40 5.33% 55 845(45)105.6% E 2021 Existing91.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Davis BoulevardAirport Road6D 545 E E 2,900 1580 1610 30 1.90% 112 1722 1178 59.4% C92.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Airport RoadRattlesnake Hammock Road 6D 604 E E 2,900 2230 2780 550 24.66% 335 3115(215)107.4% F 2023 Existing93.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Rattlesnake Hammock Road Triangle Boulevard6D 572 E E 3,000 1860 1980 120 6.45% 530 2510 490 83.7% D94.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Triangle BoulevardCollier Boulevard6D 571 E E 3,000 1470 1690 220 14.97% 357 2047 953 68.2% C95.1 US41 Tamiami Trail East Collier BoulevardJoseph Lane6D 608 D E 3,100 1040 900(140) -13.46%558 1458 1642 47.0% B95.2 US41 Tamiami Trail East Joseph LaneGreenway Road4D 608 D E 2,000 1040 900(140) -13.46%275 1175 825 58.8% C95.3 US41 Tamiami Trail East Greenway RoadSan Marco Drive2U 608 D E 1,075 1040 900(140) -13.46%157 1057 18 98.3% D 2025 202196.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East San Marco DriveSR 292U 617A D E 1,000 220 220 0 0.00% 6 226 774 22.6% B97.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East SR 29Dade County Line2U 616A D E 1,000 190 190 0 0.00% 8 198 802 19.8% B98.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Lee County LineWiggins Pass Road6D 546 E N 3,100 2110 2150 40 1.90% 57 2207 893 71.2% C99.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Wiggins Pass RoadImmokalee Road6D 564 E N 3,100 2720 2920 200 7.35% 54 2974 126 95.9% E 2024 2023100.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Immokalee RoadVanderbilt Beach Road 6D 577 E * N 3,410 1790 1950 160 8.94% 18 1968 1442 57.7% C101.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulf Park Drive6D 563 E N 3,100 2250 2600 350 15.56% 10 2610 490 84.2% D2029102.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Gulf Park DrivePine Ridge Road6D 562 E * N 3,410 2190 2340 150 6.85% 0 2340 1070 68.6% C108.0Thomasson Drive Bayshore DriveUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 698 D E 800 550 590 40 7.27% 70 660 140 82.5% D109.0 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulfshore DriveUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U/4D 524 E * E 1,540 930 1160 230 24.73% 13 1173 367 76.2% D110.1 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road 4D 646 D E 1,900 1480 1600 120 8.11% 14 1614 286 84.9% D2029110.2 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road4D/6D 666 D E 2,500 1760 1770 10 0.57% 61 1831 669 73.2% C111.1 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Airport RoadLivingston Road6D 579 E E 3,000 1920 2710 790 41.15% 4 2714 286 90.5% D 2023 2023111.2 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Livingston RoadLogan Blvd.6D 668 E E 3,000 2210 2420 210 9.50% 64 2484 516 82.8% D2025112.0 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Logan BoulevardCollier Boulevard6D 580 E E 3,000 1640 1950 310 18.90% 133 2083 917 69.4% C114.0 CR901 Vanderbilt DriveBonita Beach RoadWiggins Pass Road2U 548 D N 1,000 458 390(68) -14.85%33 423 577 42.3% B115.0 CR901 Vanderbilt DriveWiggins Pass Road111th Avenue2U 578 D N 1,000 458 400(58) -12.66%13 413 587 41.3% B116.0Westclox RoadCarson RoadSR 292U 611 D W 800 200 220 20 10.00% 0 220 580 27.5% B117.0 CR888 Wiggins Pass Road Vanderbilt DriveUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 669 D E 1,000 448 420(28) -6.25%27 447 553 44.7% B Page 12 of 1339.A.3.bPacket Pg. 1552Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Attachment "F"57 58 61 63 64 65 66Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) Based on Adopted LOS, Trip Bank and Traffic CountsPeak 2019 2020 2019 201920202020TrafficHour 1Peak Peak 2020 20202020 Counts + 2020w/TB CountsTrip BankPeak DirHourHourNet PercentTotal Counts + Trip Bank Counts +LYearYearExist Cnt. Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir Change ChangeTrip Trip BankRemainingTrip BankO Expected ExpectedID# Road# Link From To Road Sta. Std*Dir Volume Volume Volume In Volume In VolumeBankVolume Capacity V/C S Deficient Deficient145679101112133031424381828384858687Min118.0Wilson BlvdImmokalee RoadGolden Gate Boulevard 2U 650 D S 900 350 350 0 0.00% 0 350 550 38.9% B119.0 CR858 Oil Well RoadImmokalee RoadEverglades Boulevard 4D 725S D E 2,000 840 950 110 13.10% 417 1367 633 68.4% C120.0 CR858 Oil Well RoadEverglades Boulevard Desoto Boulevard2U 694 D E 1,100 390 370(20) -5.13%212 582 518 52.9% B121.1Oil Well RoadDeSoto BoulevardOil Well Grade2U 694 D E 1,100 390 370(20) -5.13%174 544 556 49.5% B121.2Oil Well RoadOil Well GradeAve Maria Blvd4D 694 D E 2,000 390 370(20) -5.13%174 544 1456 27.2% B122.0Oil Well RoadAve Maria BlvdSR 292U 694 D E 800 390 370(20) -5.13%158 528 272 66.0% C123.0Golden Gate Boulevard Wilson Boulevard18th Street NE/SE4U 652 D E 2,300 1270 1440 170 13.39% 15 1455 845 63.3% C123.1Golden Gate Boulevard 18th Street NE/SEEverglades Boulevard2U 4D652 D E 2,300 1270 1440 170 13.39% 5 1445 855 62.8% C124.0Golden Gate Boulevard Everglades Boulevard DeSoto Boulevard2UManualD E 1,010 232 237 5 2.16% 0 237 773 23.5% B125.0 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 4D 535 D E 2,400 1540 1610 70 4.55% 8 1618 782 67.4% C132.0 Randall Boulevard Immokalee Road Everglades Boulevard 2U 651 D E 900 810 870 60 7.41% 23 893 7 99.2% D 2022 2021133.0Randall Boulevard Everglades Boulevard DeSoto Boulevard2UManualD E 900 652 665 13 1.99% 0 665 235 73.9% C134.0Everglades Boulevard I-75Golden Gate Blvd2U 637S D S 800 530 541 11 2.08% 0 541 259 67.6% C135.0Everglades Boulevard Golden Gate Boulevard Oil Well Road2U 636S D N 800 410 418 8 1.95% 58 476 324 59.5% C136.0Everglades Boulevard Oil Well RoadImmokalee Road2U 635S D N 800 490 560 70 14.29% 0 560 240 70.0% C137.0DeSoto Boulevard I-75Golden Gate Boulevard 2U 639A D S 800 140 160 20 14.29% 0 160 640 20.0% B138.0DeSoto Boulevard Golden Gate Boulevard Oil Well Road2U 638A D S 800 130 140 10 7.69% 8 148 652 18.5% B142.0Orange Blossom Drive Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road2D 647 D * W 1,320 380 410 30 7.89% 26 436 884 33.0% B143.0Orange Blossom Drive Airport RoadLivingston Road2U 647 D W 1,000 380 410 30 7.89% 73 483 517 48.3% B144.0Shadowlawn Drive US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Davis Boulevard2U 523 D N 800 220 250 30 13.64% 0 250 550 31.3% B* Segment designated as "Constrained" with SV increase +10%1 Level of service calculations for road facilities means calculations for peak hour traffic on a roadway segment for maximum service volumes at the adopted LOS. Peak hour is calculated as the 100th highest hour based on a 10 month period (omitting February and March), which is generally equivalent to the 250th highest hour for a twelve (12) month period. For design of roadway capacity projects, the 30th highest hour for a 12-month period at LOS "D" will be utilized. (LDC Section 6.02.03 C.)Page 13 of 1339.A.3.bPacket Pg. 1553Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) ID# MapLast YearRoadway From ToTrip Bank (1/7th)Remaining CapacityV/C (Std)TCMA TCEAYear Expected DeficientExpected Def. Last YearSolutions1.0Airport RoadImmokalee RoadVanderbilt Beach Road 39 471 78.6% Yes6-lane Improvement CST FY202223.0Goodlette-Frank Road Immokalee RoadVanderbilt Beach Road0 90 91.0% No 2025 2027 Future 6-lane Improvement Design/ROW/AdvCST Programmed, CST FY202532.1Collier BoulevardGreen BoulevardGolden Gate Pwky49 521 77.3% Yes6-lane Improvement CST FY202332.2Collier BoulevardGolden Gate PwkyGolden Gate Main Canal 241 199 91.3% Yes 20256-lane Improvement D/B CST FY202333.0Collier BoulevardI-75Davis Boulevard313 -273107.6% Yes Existing 2024 Within the East Central TCMA - Funded for CST by FDOT FY25 36.2Collier BoulevardWal-Mart Driveway Manatee Road158 -78 103.9% No Existing 2028 6-lane Improvement FDOT Funding for R/W FY2021 and CST FY202467.2Pine Ridge RoadLivingston RoadI-7570 700 82.1% YesExisting CFI/R-Cut/DDI Improvements CST Funded FY2023110.1Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road14 286 84.9% Yes 20296-lane Improvement CST FY2025TBDVanderbilt Beach Road Collier Blvd16th Street NENA NA NA No NA NA New 4-lane Improvement from Collier Blvd to Wilson Blvd (2-lanes from Wilson Blvd to 16th St NE) FY2022TBDVanderbilt Beach Road 16th Street NEEverglades BlvdNA NA NA No NA NA Future 2-lane Improvement R/W & Adv. CST FY2022-2024TBDVeterans Memorial Blvd. Phases I & IILivingston RdUS 41NA NA NA Yes NA NA New 4-lane Improvement Design & R/W FY2021-2022 & CST FY2023TBDWhippoorwill Ln - Marbella Lake Dr InterconnectionWhippoorwill LaneMarbella Lakes DrNA NA NA Yes NA NA New 2-lane Improvement CST FY2020118.0Wilson BlvdImmokalee RoadGolden Gate Boulevard 0 550 38.9% No4-lane Improvement Design FY2021 & CST FY2024123.1Golden Gate Boulevard 18th Street NE/SEEverglades Boulevard5 855 62.8% No4-lane Improvement CST FY2020 (Completed)132.0Randall Boulevard Immokalee Road8th Street NE23 7 99.2% No 2021 2023 4-lane Improvement CST FY2023 132.0Randall Boulevard 8th Street NEEverglades Boulevard23 7 99.2% No 2021 2023 Future 4-lane Improvement Design FY2023 ID# MapLast YearRoadwayFromToTrip Bank (1/7th) for Info OnlyRemaining CapacityV/C (Std)TCMA TCEAYear Expected DeficientExpected Def. Last YearSolutions62.0 Old US 41 Lee County Line US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 9 -120 112.0% Yes Existing Existing Within the Northwest TCMA; Widen to 4-Lanes; PD&E Study Underway by FDOT; Pursue Federal Funding66.0 Pine Ridge Road Shirley Street Airport Road 20 -430 115.4% Yes Existing Existing Within the Northwest TCMA; Continue to Monitor; Pursue Detailed Operational Analysis if WarrantedAttachment "G"2020 AUIR Update Programmed Improvements and Deficiencies Report2020 Existing Deficiencies Based on Traffic CountsListed below are the roadway links that are currently deficient or are projected to be deficient under the concurrency system within the next five years and the programmed and proposed solutions to solve these deficiencies2020 Programmed Improvements to Address DeficienciesPage 14 of 1339.A.3.bPacket Pg. 1554Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Attachment "G"2020 AUIR Update Programmed Improvements and Deficiencies ReportListed below are the roadway links that are currently deficient or are projected to be deficient under the concurrency system within the next five years and the programmed and proposed solutions to solve these deficienciesID# MapLast YearRoadway From ToTrip Bank (1/7th)Remaining CapacityV/C (Std)TCMA TCEAYear Expected DeficientExpected Def. Last YearSolutions19.0Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road1 559 84.3% No 2029 2027 Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; 20.1Golden Gate Parkway Airport RoadLivingston Road17 583 83.6% No 20272029 Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; 20.2Golden Gate Parkway Livingston RoadI-750 200 94.4% Yes 2023 2024Within the East Central TCMA - Continue to Monitor and Review with Future I-75 Interchange Operation Analysis Report; 23.0Goodlette-Frank Road Immokalee RoadVanderbilt Beach Road0 90 91.0% Yes 2025 2027 Within the Northwest TCMA - Design/ROW/AdvCST Programmed, CST FY202526.0Goodlette-Frank Road Golden Gate Parkway US 41 (Tamiami Trail)0 20 99.3% No 2021Continue to monitor; Pursue Detailed Operational Analysis if Warranted32.2Collier BoulevardGolden Gate PwkyGolden Gate Main Canal 241 199 91.3% No 20256-lane Improvement D/B CST FY202333.0Collier BoulevardI-75Davis Boulevard313 -273107.6% Yes Existing 2024 Within the East Central TCMA - Funded for CST by FDOT FY25 36.1Collier BoulevardUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) Wal-Mart Driveway201 149 94.0% No2024Continue to monitor; Pursue Detailed Operational Analysis if Warranted36.2Collier BoulevardWal-Mart Driveway Manatee Road158 -78 103.9% No Existing 2028 Widen to 6-Ln; FDOT Funded R/W FY2021 and CST FY202441.2Immokalee RoadGoodlette-Frank Road Airport Road9 331 89.3% Yes 2024 2024Within the Northwest TCMA - Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; Pursue parallel Roadway; Veteran's Memorial Blvd to US 41 programmed for CST FY2343.1Immokalee RoadI-75Logan Boulevard490 390 88.9% No 2025 2029Continue to Monitor; Interchange Improvements Proposed in MPO Cost Feasible Plan 2021-2025, Anticipate Future VBR Extension to Reduce Volumes; Operational Analysis Underway; Study and Adv. CST FY202444.0Immokalee RoadCollier BoulevardWilson Boulevard725 95 97.1% No2021 2024Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis. Anticipate Future VBR Extension construction in 2022 to Reduce Volumes;67.1Pine Ridge RoadAirport RoadLivingston Road17 343 91.2% No 2025 2020Within the Northwest TCMA - Congestion Corridor Study Completed for Pine Ridge Road @ Livingston programmed in CIE; PD&E Programmed in FY 19/20 for Interchange Area. Construction programmed in 2023; SV Increased in 2020 AUIR88.0SR 82Lee County LineSR 2955 -45 105.6% No Existing 2020 Widen to 4-Ln; Gator Slough to SR29 FDOT Under CST; Remaining Funded for CST FY2492.0Tamiami Trail East Airport RoadRattlesnake Hammock Road 335 -215107.4% Yes Existing 2027 Within the South US 41 TCEA; Continue to Monitor; Pursue Detailed Operational Analysis if Warranted95.3Tamiami Trail East Greenway RoadSan Marco Drive157 18 98.3% No 2021 ExistingGreenway Rd to 6-L Farms Rd is funded thru CST in the MPO CFP (2031-2040); East of 6-L Farms RD is not expected to be deficient within the same time frame; Continue to Monitor; 99.0Tamiami Trail North Wiggins Pass Road Immokalee Road54 126 95.9% Yes 2023 2026Within the Northwest TCMA; Proposed Veterans Memorial Blvd. will provide a connection to Livingston North/South that should provide additional relief; Continue to Monitor111.1Vanderbilt Beach Road Airport RoadLivingston Road4 286 90.5% Yes 2023Within the Northwest TCMA;111.2Vanderbilt Beach Road Livingston RoadLogan Blvd.64 516 82.8% Y/N 2025Livingston to I-75 is in the Northwest TCMA132.0Randall Boulevard Immokalee RoadEverglades Boulevard23 7 99.2% No 2021 2023Immokalee Rd @ Randall Blvd Intersection Improvement PD&E Underway; Immokalee Rd. to 8th Street Funded for Construction in FY22; Randall Blvd. Corridor Study Complete; Continue to Pursue FundingProjected Deficiencies Existing-2025 (Traffic Counts + Trip Bank & 1/7th Vested Trips)Page 15 of 1339.A.3.bPacket Pg. 1555Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Attachment "G"2020 AUIR Update Programmed Improvements and Deficiencies ReportListed below are the roadway links that are currently deficient or are projected to be deficient under the concurrency system within the next five years and the programmed and proposed solutions to solve these deficienciesID# MapLast YearRoadway From ToTrip Bank (1/7th)Remaining CapacityV/C (Std)TCMA TCEAYear Expected DeficientExpected Def. Last YearSolutions17.0Golden Gate Boulevard Collier BoulevardWilson Boulevard0 390 83.0% No2030Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; Anticipate Future VBR Extension construction in 2022 to Reduce Volumes;22.0Golden Gate Parkway Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard60 190 90.4% Yes2026 2022Within the East Central TCMA - Operational Analysis Underway; Continue to Monitor and Review with Future I-75 Interchange Operation Analysis Report; Green Blvd. east of Logan being studied (FY2023) as a potential reliever.27.0Green BoulevardSanta Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard10 140 84.4% Yes2029Within the East Central TCMA;30.1Collier BoulevardImmokalee RoadVanderbilt Beach Road 517 603 79.9% No 2030 2029Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; 4-laning of parallel reliever in 2022 (Wilson Blvd - Immokalee Rd. to GG Blvd CST FY2024)34.0Collier BoulevardDavis BoulevardRattlesnake Hammock Road 441 429 85.7% No2030Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; 37.0Collier BoulevardManatee RoadMainsail Drive211 299 86.4% No 2029 2028 Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; 42.2Immokalee RoadLivingston RoadI-7530 450 87.1% Yes 2028Within the Northwest TCMA - Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; Parallel Roadway Veteran's Memorial Blvd programmed for construction in 2022; Connection to US 41 FY202343.2Immokalee RoadLogan BoulevardCollier Boulevard735 435 86.4% No2027 2024Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis. Anticipate Future VBR Extension construction in 2022 to Reduce Volumes;45.0Immokalee RoadWilson BoulevardOil Well Road465 525 84.1% No 2028 2024Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis. Anticipate Future VBR Extension construction in 2022 to Reduce Volumes;49.0Logan BoulevardPine Ridge RoadGreen Boulevard50 320 83.2% Yes 2029Within the East Central TCMA; Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; 65.0Pine Ridge RoadGoodlette-Frank Road Shirley Street19 351 87.5% Yes 2027Within the Northwest TCMA; Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; 68.0Pine Ridge RoadI-75Logan Boulevard126 274 90.2% Yes 2026Within the Northwest TCMA; Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; 101.0Tamiami Trail North Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulf Park Drive10 490 84.2% Yes 2029Within the Northwest TCMA; Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; 110.1Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road14 286 84.9% Yes 2029Within the Northwest TCMA; Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; Design & CST programmed for FY 2025 ID# MapLast YearRoadwayFromToTrip Bank (1/7th)Remaining CapacityV/C (Std)TCMA TCEAYear Expected DeficientExpected Def. Last YearSolutions42.1Immokalee RoadAirport RoadLivingston Road11 729 76.5% Yes202558.0N. 1st StreetNew Market RoadSR-29 (Main Street)24 226 74.9% No202867.2Pine Ridge RoadLivingston RoadI-7570 770 80.3% YesExistingDropped from Last Year's ListsProjected Deficiencies 2026-2030 (Traffic Counts + Trip Bank & 1/7th Vested Trips)Page 16 of 1339.A.3.bPacket Pg. 1556Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) X X X !( !( !( !( !(COUNTY BARN RDWiden to 6-Ln; PD&E On-Going FDOT Funding R/W: FY2021 CST: FY2024 Year Expected Deficient 2023 Northwest TCMA EVERGLADES BLVDYear Expected Deficient 2025 Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted Year Expected Deficient 2026 / East Central TCMA Operational Analysis Underway PD&E Underway (FY2019) Pursue State Funding IMMOKALEE ROAD East Central TCMA Pursue Detailed Operational Analysis if Warranted Bridge at 8th St. NE (Completed) Year Expected Deficient: 2021 Corridor Study Completed Immokalee Rd to 8th Street CST in FY2023 Year Expected Deficient 2024 Operational Analysis Underway Study/AdvCST: FY2024 Year Expected Deficient 2025 Northwest TCMA Design: FY23 CST: FY2024-2025 Northwest TCMA Pursue Detailed Operational Analysis if Warranted East Central TCMA; Congestion Corridor Study Complete, CST FY 2023 Logan Blvd N. (Completed)Immokalee/951 Intersection (Completed) Tree Farm/Woodcrest (Completed) Bridge at 47th Ave. NE Design & Mitigation: FY2024 Construction: FY2024 Wilson/Blackburn (By Others) City Gate Blvd. N (By Others) Existing Deficiency South US 41 TCEA Design/Build: Under Construction CST by FDOT FY2025 Year Expected Deficient 2024 Northwest TCMA Year Expected Deficient 2025 Bridges at 16th St. NE Design & Mitigation: FY2021 Construction: FY2021 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Ext. New 3-Lane (of future 6-Lane) Roadway to Relieve Congestion on Immokalee Rd and Golden Gate Blvd. Design: FY2018-2019 ROW & Mitigation: FY2019-2020 Construction: FY2022 Year Expected Deficient: 2029 Northwest TCMA Widen to 6-Lanes ROW/Design: FY 2025 Construction: FY2025 Veterans Memorial Blvd New 2-Lane Roadway to Relieve Immokalee Rd. Congestion ROW/Design: FY 2022 Construction: FY 2023 VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD Year Expected Deficient: 2021 Continue to Monitor Intersection Improvements (Completed) Intersection Improvements Study & ROW: FY2019 Construction: 2022 Intersection Improvements Design: FY2020 ROW: FY2021 Construction: FY2023 Wilson Benfield Study/PE: FY2018 Adv. ROW: FY2021-2024I-75I-75I-75I-75 Intersection Improvements (FDOT) Design: FY2021 ROW: FY2018-2020 Construction: FY2021 Mitigation: FY2018, FY2020-2021 Whippoorwill Ln/Marbella Lakes Drive Interconnection Construction: 2020 Manatee Rd to Mainsail Dr. Year Expected Deficient 2029 Oil Well Road Adv.Construction: 2020-2024 Airport Rd Design: FY2020 ROW: FY2020 CST: FY2022 Year Expected Deficient: 2025 Collier BLVD - Widen to 6-lanes D/B CST: FY2023 Year Expected Deficient: 2029 Green Blvd. Widen to 4 lanes Study: FY2023 Existing Deficiency Immokalee Rd to Golden Gate Blvd Design: FY21 CST: FY2024 Year Expected Deficient 2024 Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext Rd 16th to Everglades Blvd Design: FY22 R/W & M: FY22 R/W & AdvCST: FY23 & FY24 Wilson Benfield City Gate Blvd to N. of I-75 CST: 2019 & 2020 East Central TCMA Continue to Monitor Review with Future I-75 Interchange Operations Report Year Expected Deficient 2029 Northwest TCMA Year Expected Deficient: 2030 Relief Expected from VBR Ext.:FY2022 Continue to Monitor Year Expected Deficient: 2028 Continue to Monitor Year Expected Deficient: 2030 Continue to Monitor Year Expected Deficient: 2024 Monitor & Pursue Detailed Operational Analysis as Needed Year Expected Deficient: 2021 Pursue Detailed Operational Analysis Year Expected Deficient: 2028 Continue to Monitor Year Expected Deficient 2023 Northwest TCMA Year Expected Deficient 2025 West of I-75 in NW TCMA Pursue Detailed Operational Analysis Year Expected Deficient 2027 Continue to Monitor Year Expected Deficient: 2026 Continue to Monitor Year Expected Deficient: 2029 Continue to Monitor Year Expected Deficient: 2028 Continue to Monitor Connection to US 41 CST FY2023 SR 29COLLIER BLVDOIL WELL RD TAMIAMI TRL NDAVIS BLVDGOODLETTE FRANK RDRADIO RD IMMOKALEE RD E VANDERBILT DRVANDERBILT BEACH RD PINE RIDGE RD GREEN BLVD GOLDEN GATE BLVDOLD US 41T A M I A M I T R L E TA M I A M I T R L E OIL WELL RD GOLDEN GATE PKWY RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RDAIRPORT PULLING RDLIVINGSTON RDWILSON BLVDCAMP KEAIS RDDESOTO BLVDSANTA BARBARA BLVDVANDERBILT BEACH RD EXT. RANDALL BLVD COLLIER BLVDBONITA BEACH RD PROJECTED COLLIER COUNTY DEFICIENT ROADS 0 2 4 6 81Miles GIS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTTRANSPORTATION PLANNINGFY 2020 - FY 2030 ATTACHMENT H-1 GULF OFMEXI COSan Marco RDBald Eag le DRN Collier BLVDCollier BLVDTa m i a m i T R L E Bald Eagle DR INSET MAP Manatee Rd to Mainsail Dr. Year Expected Deficient 2029 ¯ Legend Capacity Enhancement Project Existing Deficiency Projected Deficiency < 5 Years Projected Deficiency 5 to 10 Years TCMA/TCEA BoundaryPage 17 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1557 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) FDOT Funded CST: FY 2024 FDOT Funded Under CST PROJECTED COLLIER COUNTY DEFICIENT ROADSFY 2020 - FY 2030 Growth Management Department Transportation Planning ATTACHMENT H-2 0 1 2 30.5 Miles GIS Mapping: Beth Yang, AICPGrowth Management Department / LakeTrafford Hendry County Camp Keais RD '29 '29 '29 ")846 ")846 Legend Projected Deficiency < 5 Years Projected Deficiency 5 to10 Years Existing Deficiency Capacity Improvement Project Page 18 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1558 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) TCMA ReportCollier County Transportation Concurrency Management SystemEast Central TCMAAUIR IDStreet NameFromToPkHr-PkDir (1)V/C RatioLength #Lanes Lane MilesLane Miles @ V/C <= 1.0014.0 Davis Boulevard Lakewood Boulevard County Barn Road 0.78 1.71 4 6.83 6.8315.0 Davis Boulevard County Barn Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 0.71 0.75 4 3.02 3.0216.1 Davis Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Rd. 0.29 2.62 6 15.71 15.7116.2 Davis Boulevard Radio Rd. Collier Boulevard 0.49 2.32 6 13.93 13.9320.2 Golden Gate Parkway Livingston Rd. I-75 0.94 1.97 6 11.8 11.8221.0 Golden Gate Parkway I-75 Santa Barbara Boulevard 0.68 1.01 6 6.07 6.0722.0 Golden Gate Parkway Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 0.90 2.21 4 8.84 8.8427.0 Green Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 0.84 1.99 2 3.99 3.9931.2 Collier Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Green Boulevard 0.70 0.88 6 5.28 5.2832.1Collier BoulevardGreen BoulevardGolden Gate Pwky0.771.0644.244.2432.2Collier BoulevardGolden Gate Pwky Golden Gate Main Canal 0.911.0144.044.0432.3Collier BoulevardGolden Gate Main CanalI-750.610.6585.205.2033.0Collier BoulevardI-75Davis Boulevard1.080.5684.470.0049.0Logan BoulevardPine Ridge RoadGreen Boulevard0.830.8843.533.5354.0Livingston RoadPine Ridge RoadGolden Gate Parkway0.452.60615.5915.5955.0Livingston RoadGolden Gate ParkwayRadio Road0.611.4168.498.4967.2Pine Ridge RoadLivingston Rd.I-750.822.20613.2013.2068.0Pine Ridge RoadI-75Logan Boulevard0.900.9965.975.9770.0Radio RoadLivingston Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 0.822.0047.987.9871.0Radio RoadSanta Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard0.461.3445.365.3676.0 Santa Barbara BoulevardGreen BoulevardGolden Gate Parkway0.761.7046.816.8177.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Golden Gate ParkwayRadio Road0.741.4068.438.4378.0 Santa Barbara BoulevardRadio RoadDavis Boulevard0.561.0566.326.32125.0Pine Ridge RoadLogan BoulevardCollier Boulevard0.671.8847.537.5336.22182.65178.18Total Lane Miles:182.65Lane Miles <=1.00 V/C:178.18(1) V/C Ratio based upon Total Traffic, including Traffic Counts + Total Trip BankPercent Lane Miles Meeting Standard:97.6%Attachment IPage 19 of 1339.A.3.bPacket Pg. 1559Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Attachment ITCMA ReportCollier County Transportation Concurrency Management SystemNorthwest TCMAAUIR IDStreet NameFromToPkHr-PkDir (1)V/C RatioLength #Lanes Lane MilesLane Miles @ V/C <= 1.001.0 Airport Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 0.79 1.97 4 7.9 7.892.1 Airport Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Dr. 0.79 1.53 6 9.2 9.182.2 Airport Road Orange Blossom Dr. Pine Ridge Rd. 0.76 2.92 6 17.5 17.5123.0 Goodlette-Frank Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 0.91 1.80 2 3.6 3.6024.1 Goodlette-Frank Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Dr. 0.65 0.88 4 3.5 3.5224.2 Goodlette-Frank Road Orange Blossom Dr. Pine Ridge Road 0.69 1.53 6 9.2 9.1829.0 Gulfshore Drive 111th Avenue Vanderbilt Beach Road 0.39 1.31 2 2.6 2.6239.0 111th Avenue N. Gulfshore Drive Vanderbilt Drive 0.41 0.51 2 1.0 1.0140.0 111th Avenue N. Vanderbilt Drive Tamiami Trail 0.62 1.00 2 2.0 2.0141.1 Immokalee Road Tamiami Trail Goodlette-Frank Rd. 0.72 1.47 6 8.8 8.8441.2 Immokalee Road Goodlette-Frank Rd. Airport Road 0.89 2.47 6 14.8 14.8142.1 Immokalee Road Airport Road Livingston Rd. 0.76 1.96 6 11.8 11.7942.2 Immokalee Road Livingston Rd. I-75 0.87 1.78 7 12.5 12.4851.0 Livingston Road Imperial Street Immokalee Road 0.50 3.31 6 19.8 19.8552.0 Livingston Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 0.72 1.99 6 12.0 11.9653.0 Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 0.50 2.21 6 13.3 13.2662.0 Old US 41 US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Lee County line 1.13 1.57 2 3.1 0.0063.0 Seagate Drive Crayton Road Tamiami Trail 0.58 0.48 4 1.9 1.9364.0 Pine Ridge Road Tamiami Trail Goodlette-Frank Road 0.70 0.50 6 3.0 3.0265.0 Pine Ridge Road Goodlette-Frank Road Shirley Street 0.87 0.67 6 4.0 4.0566.0 Pine Ridge Road Shirley Street Airport Road 1.16 0.81 6 4.9 0.0067.1 Pine Ridge Road Airport Road Livingston Rd. 0.91 2.09 6 12.56 12.5698.0 Tamiami Trail North Lee County Line Wiggins Pass Road 0.71 1.67 6 10.0 10.0299.0 Tamiami Trail North Wiggins Pass Road Immokalee Road 0.96 1.52 6 9.1 9.11100.0 Tamiami Trail North Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 0.58 1.51 6 9.1 9.06101.0 Tamiami Trail North Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulf Park Drive 0.84 1.26 6 7.6 7.58102.0 Tamiami Trail North Gulf Park Drive Pine Ridge Road 0.69 1.44 6 8.6 8.64109.0 Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulfshore Drive Tamiami Trail 0.76 1.34 2 2.7 2.68110.1 Vanderbilt Beach Road Tamiami Trail Goodlette-Frank Road 0.85 1.87 4 7.5 7.50110.2 Vanderbilt Beach Road Goodlette-Frank Rd. Airport Road 0.73 2.40 4 9.6 9.58111.1 Vanderbilt Beach Road Airport Road Livingston Rd. 0.90 3.22 6 19.3 19.30111.2 Vanderbilt Beach Road Livingston Rd. I-75 0.83 1.00 6 6.0 6.00114.0 Vanderbilt Drive Lee County Line Wiggins Pass Road 0.42 2.52 2 5.0 5.03115.0 Vanderbilt Drive Wiggins Pass Road 111th Avenue 0.41 1.49 2 3.0 2.99117.0 Wiggins Pass Road Vanderbilt Drive Tamiami Trail 0.45 1.05 2 2.1 2.10142.0 Orange Blossom Drive Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road 0.33 1.35 2 2.70 2.70143.0 Orange Blossom Drive Airport Road Livingston Road 0.48 1.01 2 2.02 2.0259.44 283.39 275.37Total Lane Miles: 283.4Lane Miles <=1.0 V/C: 275.4(1) V/C Ratio based upon Total Traffic, including Traffic Counts + Total Trip BankPercent Lane Miles Meeting Standard:97.2%Page 20 of 1339.A.3.bPacket Pg. 1560Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Project FY20 Number SUMMARY OF PROJECTS BY NAME Amount 60168 Vanderbilt Beach Rd Coller Blvd to 8th St 40,476 60145 Golden Gate Blvd 11,268 60129 Wilson Benfield 6,318 60199 Vanderbilt Beach Rd US41 to E of Goodlette 1,300 Total 59,362 **As of 6/30/20 Attachment J FY20 Activity Report on continuing Projects under Contract/DCA/Advanced Construction (Dollars shown in Thousands) Page 21 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1561 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COUNTY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTENTS • COUNTY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ‒ SUMMARY • EXISTING CANAL SYSTEMS AND CONTROL STRUCTURES ‒ OVERVIEW • COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER CANAL SYSTEM ‒ MAP • COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER CONTROL STRUCTURES ‒ MAP • PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 5-YEAR WORK PROGRAM • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT LOCATION MAP • ATTACHMENT A: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT PLANNING PROCESS • ATTACHMENT B: SYSTEM INVENTORY AND GIS DATABASE REPORT • ATTACHMENT “C”: TABLES TABLE 2 ‒ CURRENT CANAL SYSTEM INVENTORY TABLE 3 ‒ CANAL AND DITCH CONDITION RATING SYSTEM TABLE 4 ‒ CURRENT CONTROL STRUCTURE INVENTORY TABLE 5 ‒ CONTROL STRUCTURE INSPECTION RATING SYSTEM • ATTACHMENT “D”: BASINS AND SUBBASINS REPORT: FIGURE 4– COLLIER COUNTY BASINS MAP FIGURE 5– COLLIER COUNTY DISCHARGE RATE MAP TABLE 5– COLLIER COUNTY BASINS Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 22 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1562 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 2020 AUIR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FACILITIES SUMMARY Facility Type: County Maintained System of Stormwater Management Canals & Structures (Category A) Level of Service (LOS) Standard: Varies by individual watershed Existing System within Collier County: Based on current Collier County GIS Database Existing Major Canals 406.8 Miles System Maintained by Collier County: Based on current Collier County GIS Database Existing Major Canals 143.2 Miles Proposed Reconstruction/Additions within 5-Year Planning Period 1.2 Miles Existing Major Water Control Structures 72 Proposed Replacement/Additional Structures within 5-Year Planning Period 3 Stormwater Program Summary FY 2021 thru FY 2025 Recommended Work Program $ 157,105,000 Recommended Revenues $ 103,167,000 Five-Year Surplus or (Deficit) $ (53,938,000) Based on projected funding availability and does not reflect the entirety of unmet stormwater needs. FY21 outlays actual proposed budget, subsequent years are proposed/estimated and are subject to change. 1. Existing Revenue Sources FY21-24 Roll Forward $ 2,919,000 General Fund (001) $ 24,345,000 General Fund (111) $ 15,625,000 General Fund (310) $ 0 Anticipated Grants $ 0 Interest $ 295,000 Neg 5% Revenue Reserve $ (17,000) 325 Reserves $ 0 Debt Funding $ 60,000,000 Total $ 103,167,000 Page 23 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1563 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 2. Supplemental Revenue Sources None Required Recommended Action That the BCC direct the County Manager or his designee to include County stormwater projects appearing on the proposed “Stormwater Five - Year Work Program,” (Table 1) as detailed in the attached Project Descriptions and prioritized by the Stormwater Project Prioritization Process in the next Annual CIE Update and Amendment with the application of revenues as outlined in the Program Revenue section of Table 1; and that it approves the proposed 2020 Stormwater Management System AUIR and adopt the CIE Update for FY2020/21 – FY2024/25. EXISTING MAJOR CANAL SYSTEMS AND CONTROL STRUCTURES Currently, the County maintains 147.3 miles of canal (including ditches) and 72 stormwater control structures. Figures 1 and 2 show the locations for all major canals (including ditches) and stormwater control structures maintained by the County, respectively. The County, working collaboratively with South Florida Water Management District, provides easements over the primary and secondary watercourses, in accordance with the Cooperative Agreement between Collier County and South Florida Water Management District. Table 3 identifies control structures maintained by Collier County. In 2012, CH2MHill completed a structural evaluation of county major water control structures. Each control structure (Table 3) has an overall condition rating based on two types of inspections: Structural and Civil. The overall condition rating ranks from C-1 (no action needed) to C-5 (critical repair or replacement needed immediately). The ratings are based on identified deficiencies and the potential resulting impact. Table 4 explains each rating. The County is currently in the process of completing an updated structural evaluation of all county stormwater control structures with CH2M and is included in Table 3, which provided the evaluation results of the 2019 Report. Page 24 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1564 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Figure 1: Collier County Major Stormwater Canal System Page 25 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1565 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Figure 2: Collier County Major Stormwater Control Structures Page 26 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1566 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 27 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1567 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) FY 21 – 25 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Countywide Programs, Planning & Maintenance Stormwater Feasibility and Preliminary Design (P/N 51144) This project includes funding for long range strategic planning for future program progression, capital improvement project identification and prioritization, specific basin issue evaluation and funding appropriation analysis. Individual Project Feasibility Studies will be funded from this Project and guided by the project ranking criteria established in the Planning process identified in Attachment A. NPDES MS4 Program (P/N 60121) Funding within this project covers continued development of and compliance with the federally mandated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting program for the County operated Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4). Stormwater Maintenance (P/N 60194) This project includes funding of various maintenance activities associated with certain existing county stormwater management assets such as the Freedom Park water quality treatment system, Serenity Park’s surface water management area, and the Wiggins Pass Road area surface water flow way. Infrastructure & Capacity Projects 1. Golden Gate City Outfall Replacements (P/N 51029) Project is to improve collection treatment and conveyance urban stormwater runoff by restoring an upgrading antiquated system installed in early 1960s within the four (4) square mile area known as Golden Gate City (GGC). The GGC canal system flows into Naples bay via the Main Golden Gate Canal. The project includes the replacement and improvements to existing aging infrastructure such as the removal of old catch basins replaced with ditch bottom inlets with grates to catch debris, the addition of sumps at catch basins, re-grading and sodding of swales to prevent erosion providing water quality improvement. Over a $50 million program. Individual projects to be delivered as time and budget allow. 2. Pine Ridge Stormwater Management Improvements (P/N 60126) A feasibility study/master plan was completed in 2017 to serve as a guide for this area’s future projects. Improvements in the Pine Ridge Estates Area include replacement of existing aging infrastructure such as catch basins, culverts and re-grading and sodding of roadside swales. Current work includes design of outfall improvements in Basin 6. 3. Immokalee Stormwater Improvements (P/N 60143) This project includes an update to the Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan, future stormwater treatment pond sighting feasibility analysis, coordination with the Lake Trafford Management Group, and the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. Future stormwater management improvement projects, as prioritized by the master plan update, will be fully coordinated and vetted with the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency. 4. Naples Park Area Stormwater Improvements (P/N 60139) In coordination with the Public Utilities Division, this project includes water main and sanitary sewer collection system replacements, as well as roadside stormwater management system Page 28 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1568 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) improvements. Roadside stormwater improvements are occurring in conjunction with utility replacement work on all east-west streets in the Naples Park Subdivision. This is a multi- year, multi-phase project. 5. West Goodlette-Frank Road Area Stormwater Improvement (P/N 60142) Project planning and design has been completed, construction is currently underway, in coordination with the City of Naples Wastewater Collection System improvements to address stormwater (flooding) problems and existing septic system failures during periods of high rainfall on several streets between Goodlette-Frank Road and US-41. Stormwater runoff from the area flows east into the upper Gordon River then to Naples Bay. Work will include water quality improvements designed to decrease nutrient loading of stormwater runoff conveyed to the sensitive impaired receiving waters of Gordon River and Naples Bay. All phases north of the existing project will convert over 900 septic tanks to sewer conversions in addition to current project. 6. Harbor Lane Brookside (P/N 60195) Harbor Lane is a street in the Brookside neighborhood which needs surface and possibly base refurbishment. The street’s stormwater management system has reached the end of its life span and needs reconstruction as well. A new stormwater management system is currently under design. The design includes new culverts and catch basins as well as necessary water quality improvements. The Brookside neighborhood discharges stormwater into Naples Bay, an impaired waterbody. Construction is currently planned for FY 21 pending availability of funds. Contingent upon successful completion of the Harbor Lane improvements, the few remaining streets in the Brookside neighborhood will be considered for future work when funds become available. Vetting of all work within the Brookside HOA is beginning now during the design phase. City of Naples watermain replacement is also being considered as part of this project. 7. Upper Gordon River Stormwater Improvements (P/N 60102) The Gordon River watershed consists of approximately 4,432 acres and is bounded by the Crossings to the north, the Conservancy of Southwest Florida to the south, Airport Pulling Rd to the east, and US 41 to the west. Various areas throughout the Gordon River Extension (GRE) basin experience high water inundation conditions during heavy rainfall events. These areas include the Country Club of Naples, Forest Lakes, Pine Ridge Industrial Park, Poinciana Village, Golden Gate Parkway, and the properties west of GF Rd, north of Golden Gate Parkway, and south of Pine Ridge Rd. A hydrologic/hydraulic modeling analysis was performed on the basin to determine various solutions to eliminate or effectively reduce the inundation conditions. The existing conditions model indicated a poorly maintained stormwater infrastructure serving the GRE basin. After the modeling and analysis of various proposed scenarios, it is recommended to implement the following eight improvements to relieve flooding scenarios throughout the basin; the Golden Gate Parkway AMIL Gate Weir Replacement, Goodlette-Frank Supplemental Outfall, Freedom Park Stormwater Pump Station, Freedom Park Bypass Ditch & Spreader Swale, Goodlette-Frank Ditch Improvements, Solana/Burning Tree Box Culvert Extension, Maintenance Access Road/ Seawall, and the Forest Lakes Rock Weir Replacement. The implementation of the proposed improvements provided a flood area reduction of approximately 400 acres within the basin. 8. Griffin Road Area Stormwater Improvements (P/N 60196) The Griffin Road Area Stormwater Improvement Project is located near the southwestern terminus of Griffin Road in the East Naples area of Collier County off of US41 (Tamiami Page 29 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1569 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Trail) and Barefoot Williams Road. The project includes construction of a water quality treatment area on Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve property. The focus of the project is to provide water quality treatment facilities and an adequate stormwater outfall for the area to reduce frequency of flooding. 9. LASIP: Branch 11 (P/N 51101) The project is within the “LASIP” (Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project) area. The new work consists of improving a branch of canal that was discovered during construction of the Naples Manor North canal. It is undergoing scouring (erosion) and residents are concerned about undermining the foundations of their houses. Design has been completed and construction is underway. 10. RESTORE (P/N 33554) This is a new, large, comprehensive watershed improvement initiative currently in a conceptual planning stage. The initiative includes development of a suite of projects to be competed in phases, all with the goal of rehydrating and restoring historic, wet season surface water overland flow principally within the Belle Meade region of Collier County. Project concepts and a multiyear plan have been submitted to the state and the US Department of the Treasury to gain authorization for use of RESTORE Act funds to further the initiative. 11. Bayshore CRA (P/N 50169) A preliminary engineering study to identify design alternatives, constraints and opportunities to improve the stormwater management system within the Bayshore CRA Area. The complete comprehensive preliminary engineering study will provide the basis upon which stormwater improvements will be designed. 12. Resource Recovery Park This project is a future initiative to meet stormwater requirements to incorporate remote operations/automation of weir gate operations and remote operation capability to gain efficiencies for several water flow and level control structures (weirs). 13. Weir Automation (P/N 50160) This is one of many future initiatives being programmed as resources and funding becomes available. Current projects involving work on several water flow and level control structures (weirs) are in various stages of implementation. “Work” includes planning and design of powered weir gate operations and remote operation capability. All new and rehabilitated weirs with manually adjustable control gates are being considered for this potential future automation upgrade. 14. Old Lely (P/N TBD) This is multiyear improvement project being developed in coordination with the Public Utilities Department to include stormwater management, water and wastewater improvements within the Lely neighborhood community. This joint effort will reduce construction costs by capitalizing on economy of scale and avoiding multiple disturbances in the neighborhood. 15. Palm River Stormwater Improvement (P/N 60139) This is multiyear improvement project being developed in coordination with the Public Utilities Department to include stormwater management, water and wastewater improvements within the Palm River community. This joint effort will reduce construction Page 30 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1570 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) costs by capitalizing on economy of scale and avoiding multiple disturbances in the neighborhood. 16. Cocohatchee River Dredge/Conveyance Project The proposed stormwater improvement includes a survey and design of the dredge area to determine the silt removal quantity, develop spoil handling and disposal methodology, obtain all necessary permits, communicate/coordinate with all affected property owners, and dredging of the delineated areas of silt built-up at the Cocohatchee River and Palm River area, affecting downstream conveyance (site is generally located on the north side of Immokalee Road, approximately 0.4 miles east of Goodlette-Frank Road). 17. Poinciana Village The stormwater improvement project will include stormwater management improvements within the Poinciana Village community, based on a preliminary engineering study that has identified design alternatives, constraints, and opportunities to improve the stormwater management system within Poinciana Village. 18. Plantation Island Canals/Ditches (P/N 60238) Dredging of the Plantation Island Area waterways as a joint effort with Collier County Stormwater Management and Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 19. Modeling of Cocohatchee River/Haldeman/Henderson (P/N ) Modeling of the key areas as joint effort with Collier County Stormwater Management and South Florida Water Management District. The proposed study includes the modeling of key areas of conveyance of Collier County including but not limited to Cocohatchee River, Haldeman and Henderson Creeks. 20. Naples Manor A preliminary engineering study to identify design alternatives, constraints and opportunities to improve the stormwater management system within Naples Manor. The complete comprehensive preliminary engineering study will provide the basis upon which stormwater improvements for Naples Manor will be designed. Page 31 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1571 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Attachment “A” COLLIER COUNTY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT PLANNING PROCESS Objective: To adequately identify and prioritize stormwater management projects to include in the County’s AUIR/5-year Plan and Budgeting process. Purpose: To provide the Board County Commissioners with a general outline of the ongoing Project Planning and Prioritization Process. Considerations: The Stormwater Management Project Planning Process identifies and prioritizes potential projects for advancement into the AUIR/5-year Plan and annual Stormwater Management budget process. Typically, project feasibility studies are completed first. Studies are then being used to rank the projects for eventual funding and construction within the County’s AUIR/5-year Plan and annual budget process. The feasibility studies will also provide staff with better project cost estimates for preparing budget requests. Input from external stakeholders will also be used to recommend projects for the AUIR/5-year Plan. Plan Elements: ➢ Potential Project Database Staff has developed a Comprehensive Stormwater Needs database that contains all potential future stormwater improvement projects. Projects are provided from three main sources: customer complaint database, staff knowledge and Planning Studies. This database is periodically updated to reflect new information as projects are implemented and sources provide new potential projects. ➢ Project Profiles Staff selects potential projects from the database to gather detailed information to develop Project Profiles. Project Profiles are based by first determining the Objective of the Project, Benefit Area and Preliminary Conceptual Cost. Once those three basic components are defined, staff can provide information regarding affected acreage and population, per parcel cost, per acre cost, per capita cost, and per $1,000 of assessed value cost. A narrative explaining the objective, purpose and needs of the project is also provided in the Project Profile. ➢ Scoring Committee and Project Ranking Criteria A Stormwater Planning Process Committee has been established to review and score the Project Profiles. The seven (7) committee members, all county staf f, come from different departments such as Stormwater, Comprehensive and Floodplain Management Planning, Engineering, Road Maintenance, and Pollution Control. Scoring is based on four major aspects: Health and Safety, Project Feasibility, Project Support, and Environmental Benefits. ➢ Feasibility Studies Top ranked Project Profiles are selected for Feasibility Studies which provide more detailed and secured information regarding the project’s cost, life, and stages. Project Profiles are updated with information from the feasibility studies. The Scoring Committee has ranked ten (10) projects; some current and ongoing, and some conceptual projects. The ranking and evaluation process and input from the committee has been deemed extremely useful and valid. As such, ranking information is considered and utilized in this current AUIR/5-year Plan. Page 32 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1572 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Attachment “B” SYSTEM INVENTORY AND GIS DATABASE REPORT Objective: To maintain a complete and current inventory of all existing county-maintained stormwater and surface water management system assets. Purpose: To provide the Board of County Commissioners with an update on progress made to date with establishment of the Stormwater Management System Inventory GIS Database Considerations: For the past several years staff has been identifying existing stormwater management assets and sequentially building the stormwater management system geodatabase. The database currently includes the main canals and ditches, water level, and flow control structures and arterial roadway drainage infrastructure. Several hundred miles of collector and minor roadway swales, culverts and inlets are yet to be added to the dataset. They represent a majority of stormwater assets maintained on a day to day basis. All the water control structures are field verified and have conditional ratings. Field verification is ongoing for the arterial roadway stormwater management infrastructure. Current data collection is being coordinated with Operation and Maintenance staff (O&M) activities to the greatest extent possible. When data collection technicians log entries associated with geodatabase objects in advance of a scheduled O&M activity, subsequent O&M activity entries can then be connected to geodatabase objects. In this way, a work history for each asset is created that is now associated to geodatabase objects. Creating a work history for each asset can result in high level reporting such as required by the state for the County National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (NPDES MS4) Permit, Permit # FLR04E037. Some examples are pesticide sprayers accounting for chemical usage including location and acreage and sediment removal tied to asset type (inlet, culvert, and swale). Other information being collected and added to the database includes information collected during the right-of-way permitting process, roadside assets in neighborhoods, roadside improvements completed as part of neighborhood stormwater improvements, remedial work or existing condition assessments (surveys), roadway outfalls to canals or tidal waters, secondary county roadway swales, culverts, inlets and manholes including all Golden Gate Estates roads and the urban county roads, and outfalls from private developments discharging into the County maintained system. The existing Stormwater Management System Inventory GIS Database is substantial, functioning, and has become an important tool used daily by O&M staff as well as Stormwater Planning staff. All the data, maps and asset tables produced for this AUIR were generated using the database. The database is being used to capture information that is essential for mandated reporting to the state as part of the County’s NPDES MS4 Permit requirements, as well as reporting for the County’s participation in the National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System (NFIP CRS). Page 33 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1573 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Table 3: Existing Collier County Stormwater Control Structures Structure ID Facility Name Equipment Type 2012 Condition Report 2019 Condition Report 1 ARN-02-S0110 Four Seasons Outfall Weir - Fixed Stage C2 C2 2 ARN-02-S0120 Four Seasons Weir - Fixed Stage C2 C3 3 ARN-19-S0100 Victoria Park Pump Station Pump Station C3 4 ARS-01-S0100 Hawks Ridge Pump Station Pump Station C2 5 BRN-00-S0110 Sunni land Weir - Slide Gate C1 C1 6 C4C-00-S0110 Eagle Creek Weir - Slide Gate C2 C1 7 CRB-06-S0150 Weir - Fixed Stage TBD 8 D1C-00-S0120 Harvey #1 Weir - Slide Gate C2 C2 9 D1C-00-S0150 Harvey #2 Weir - Slide Gate C2 C1 10 D1C-01-S0102 VBR Weir Weir - Fixed Stage C1 C1 11 D2C-08-S0110 Island walk Inflow Weir - Fixed Stage C1 C2 12 EBC-00-S0110 Coco East Weir- AMIL Gate C2 C3 13 GRE-00-S0100 Gordon River Weir- AMIL Gate C2 C3 14 GRE-00-S0124 Gordon River Extension Weir - Fixed Stage TBD TBD 15 GRE-01-S0480 Goodlette Road Canal #1 Weir - Fixed Stage C3 C3 16 GRE-01-S0510 Goodlette Road Canal #2 Weir - Fixed Stage C1 C3 17 GRE-03-S0100 Freedom Park Overflow (Bypass) Weir Weir - Fixed Stage C1 C1 18 GRE-04-S0110 Poinciana Weir - Flashboard TBD TBD 19 GRE-36-S0100 FP Spreader Berm Weir - Fixed Stage TBD C1 20 GRE-36-S0120 FP Wetlands Weir Weir - Fixed Stage C1 C3 21 GRE-36-S0240 FP Waterfall Weir - Fixed Stage TBD TBD 22 GRE-36-S0280 Freedom Park Goodlette Rd. Pump Station Pump Station C1 23 GRE-39-S0100 West Lake Outfall Weir - Fixed Stage C1 C3 24 GRE-41-S0130 Twin Lakes Outfall Weir - Fixed Stage C1 C2 25 GRE-42-S0130 Freedom Park Gordon River Pump Station Pump Station C1 26 GRE-44-S0140 Sperling Lake Outfall Weir - Fixed Stage C1 C1 27 GTB-00-S0100 Tide-Flex and Flap Gates Tide Valve - Flap Gate C2 C3 28 GTB-04-S0110 Gateway Triangle Weir - Fixed Stage C2 C2 29 GTB-04-S0120 Weir - Fixed Stage 30 GTB-13-S0170 Gateway Triangle Pump Station Pump Station C2 31 HCB-00-S0144 Haldeman Creek Weir - Crest Gate C1 32 HCB-00-S0200 Lakewood County Club Weir Weir - Flashboard C1 C1 33 HCB-00-S0220 Lely Branch Splitter Weir - Slide Gate TBD C1 Page 34 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1574 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 34 HCB-01-S0100 Lake Kelly Weir - Fixed Stage C1 C3 35 HCB-02-S0106 Lake Avalon Weir - Fixed Stage C2 C3 36 HEC-03-S0100 Henderson #3 Weir - Slide Gate C2 37 HEC-04-S0100 Henderson #4 Weir - Slide Gate TBD TBD 38 HEC-05-S0100 Henderson #5 Weir - Slide Gate TBD TBD 39 LCB-00-S0122 Doral Circle Weir - Slide Gate C1 C1 40 LCB-00-S0150 Royal Wood Weir - Slide Gate C1 C1 41 LCB-00-S0190 Santa Barbara #1 Weir - Slide Gate C1 C1 42 LCB-00-S0210 Santa Barbara #2 Weir - Slide Gate C1 C1 43 LCB-00-S0230 Santa Barbara #3 Weir - Slide Gate C1 C2 44 LCB-01-S0106 Lely Branch Canal Weir - Slide Gate C1 45 LCB-01-S0140 Crown Pointe Weir - Slide Gate C2 C1 46 LCB-01-S0174 Davis Blvd Weir - Slide Gate TBD TBD 47 LCB-09-S0400 County Barn East Weir - Slide Gate TBD 48 LCB-09-S0446 Cope Lane Pond Weir - Slide Gate TBD 49 LCB-15-S0100 Rattlesnake Rd. Weir Weir - Fixed Stage C1 C1 50 LCB-16-S0290 Weir - Slide Gate TBD 51 LCB-20-S0220 Whitaker Rd Ditch Block (West) Weir - Fixed Stage TBD TBD 52 LCB-20-S0230 Whitaker Rd Weir Weir - Slide Gate TBD C1 53 LMB-00-S0100 Manor South Weir - Fixed Stage C1 TBD 54 LMB-00-S0120 Manor North Weir - Fixed Stage C1 C1 55 LMB-00-S0150 Warren Street Weir Weir - Slide Gate TBD TBD 56 LMB-07-S0100 Lely Wetland Pump Station Pump Station C1 57 LMB-15-S0100 R.H. Slough Weir Naples Manor Weir - Fixed Stage TBD 58 LMB-15-S0100 <Null> Spreader Waterway TBD 59 LMB-16-S0120 Wing South #2 Weir - Slide Gate C1 60 LMB-16-S0140 Wing South #1 Weir - Slide Gate C1 61 LMB-17-S0300 Wing South West Weir - Slide Gate C1 62 MGG-12-S0120 Fairgrounds Weir - Fixed Stage TBD C1 63 MGG-16-S0140 Radio Rd. Weir - Fixed Stage C1 C2 64 MGG-20-S0060 Weir - Flashboard TBD 65 PLM-00-S0100 Palm River Weir Weir - Flashboard C2 C2 66 PRC-00-S0110 Pine Ridge 1 Weir- AMIL Gate C4 C1 67 RCB-02-S0110 Hazel Rd. Weir Weir - Fixed Stage C2 C3 68 RCB-04-S0110 Collier Co. Production Park S. Weir - Fixed Stage C2 C1 69 WBB-01-S0110 Wiggins Pass Weir Weir - Fixed Stage C2 C2 71 WBC-00-S0110 Coco West Weir- AMIL Gate C2 C3 72 WBC-02-S0210 Victoria Park West Outfall Weir - Fixed Stage TBD C3 Table based on 2019 Collier County GIS Database Page 35 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1575 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Table 4: Control Structure Inspection Rating System Overall Rating Description for the Overall Structure Application C1 All old deficiencies noted from the previous inspection have been corrected. Applied when no further action is recommended for the structure. C2 Most old deficiencies noted from the previous inspection have been corrected. Applied when the overall recommendation is to monitor minor deficiencies. Deficiencies will generally be re-evaluated at the next five-year inspection of the structure. Provide overall recommendation on when (timeframe) to monitor deficiencies previous to the next structure inspection cycle. C3 Deficiencies and/or several old deficiencies noted in the last inspection have not been corrected. Applied when the overall recommendation is to repair the structure during the next maintenance cycle or within 5 to 10-year capital repair schedule. Maintenance repairs are generally estimated to cost less than $50,000; will not require engineering design. C4 Serious deficiencies exist that if not immediately corrected may lead to or cause deterioration of the structure. Applied when the overall recommendation is to elevate repairs to the County’s five-year capital repair program. Includes repairs that are generally estimated to cost $50,000 or more, will require engineering design, or should be repaired within a five-year period. C5 Major deficiencies exist such that the structural integrity of the structure will probably not withstand a major flood event. Applied when the overall recommendation is to elevate repairs to the County’s capital repair program, but repairs should be conducted in the next cycle of repairs. Generally, the next cycle of repairs would include repair design in the fiscal year following inspection with repair in the fiscal year following design (two-year process). C5 Critical Emergency deficiencies exist that must be addressed immediately. Deficiencies include those that impede operation of the structure or jeopardize public safety. Applied when immediate repairs are recommended. Generally, the County would respond by dispatching its Field Station personnel to triage the deficiency (e.g., block access to the structure, reduced structure operating capacity) until repairs could be affected. Responding County design engineers would be altered to fast track repairs if triage does not ameliorate the deficiencies. **TBD: Current condition not known at this time. Update upon next inspection. Page 36 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1576 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Attachment “D” BASINS AND SUB-BASIN REPORT Objective: To guide the County’s Stormwater Management Program by utilizing a watershed management approach. Purpose: To provide a general update on the basins/watersheds used for water resource management and planning within the County. Considerations: The Stormwater Management Program began a new approach to water resource management with the BCC’s acceptance of the County Watershed Management Plan on December 13, 2011. The Plan provides assessment and management information for geographically defined watersheds including: analysis, actions, participants, and resources related to developing and implementing the Plan. Understanding issues on a basin by basin level allows for better quantitative analysis and program planning. The Board directed staff to implement the Plan as funding and resources became available. Staff continues to follow that directive when initiating Plan recommendations. There are currently 51 basins in the Stormwater Management GIS database. Since 1990 (Ord. 90-10), the County has had a maximum allowable post-development stormwater runoff discharge rate of 0.15 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre for all basins, with six (6) exception areas (basins) ranging from 0.04 to 0.13 cfs per acre. These more restrictive rates were established through modeling efforts that demonstrated the need to restrict flows from adjacent lands to the receiving canals. Stormwater discharge rates are limited so the rate at which runoff leaves a developed site will not cause adverse off-site (typically downstream) impacts. In the development of the Watershed Management Plan (WMP), computer modeling was used to determine the maximum flow that can be conveyed by the various water management canal segments. Results from that effort indicated that various segments of the primary and secondary water management systems do not have the capacity to handle large storm events. Expansion or enlargement of this system to create additional system capacity is not a viable strategy for managing stormwater flows. One means of addressing this limited capacity is to restrict the maximum flow in the associated basins that feed into the canals. The WMP included recommendations to reduce the maximum allowable post-development discharge rates in several basins. In addition to these recommendations in the WMP, two additional detailed stormwater management master plans, developed jointly by the South Florida Water Management District and the County for the Belle Meade and Immokalee areas, recommended further limiting the discharge rates for four (4) basins/sub-basins. Conditions may worsen in the future unless management actions are implemented to control the impact of subsequent changes to land use. In total, reducing maximum allowable post-development discharge rates in sixteen (16) basins/sub-basins will ensure adequate flood protection levels of service. A feasibility study and impact analysis was completed to examine the effects of implementation of the discharge rate restrictions. Staff fully vetted the new restricted discharge rates with the Development Services Advisory Committee, the Collier County Planning Commission and, the Page 37 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1577 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) South Florida Water Management District. The new rates were then approved by the Board of County Commissioners on June 13, 2017 and became effective on August 4, 2017. This report includes a listing of all basins with their respective acreage (Table 5); a map depicting all basins within the County (Figure 4); and, a map depicting the twenty-two (22) basins that have restricted stormwater discharge rates (Figure 5). Basins and Discharge Rates Specific Discharge Limitation Basins Rate 1 2 3. Airport Road North Canal Basin Airport Road South Canal Basin Cocohatchee Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre 0.06 cfs/acre 0.04 cfs/acre 4. Lely Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre 5. Harvey Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre 6. Wiggins Bay Outlet Basin 0.13 cfs/acre 7. Henderson Creek - Belle Meade Basin North 0.06 cfs/acre 8. Henderson Creek - Belle Meade Basin South 0.04 cfs/acre 9. Immokalee Master Basin East 0.05 cfs/acre 10. Immokalee Master Basin West 0.10 cfs/acre 11. 951 Canal North Basin 0.11 cfs/acre 12. C-4 Canal Basin 0.11 cfs/acre 13. Corkscrew Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre 14. Cypress Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre 15. Faka-Union Canal Basin-N 0.09 cfs/acre 16. Gordon River Extension Basin 0.09 cfs/acre 17. I-75 Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre 18. Imperial Drainage Outlet Basin 0.12 cfs/acre 19. Lely Manor Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre 20. Main Golden Gate Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre 21. Palm River Canal Basin 0.13 cfs/acre 22. Pine Ridge Canal Basin 0.13 cfs/acre Page 38 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1578 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Figure 4: Collier County Basins Map Page 39 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1579 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) I75 Immokalee RD Ta m i a m i T R L ECollier BLVDSR 29LIVINGSTON RDTamiami TRL NDavis BLVD Pine Ridge RD Radio RD Vanderbilt Beach RDVanderbilt DRGolden Gate PKWY Oil Well RDOLD 41AIRPORT PULLING RD NGOODLETTE-FRANK RD NS 1st STGreen BLVD 9TH ST NGolden Gate BLVD W Lake Trafford RD San Marco RD N 15th STWilson BLVD NWestclox ST Bayshore DRBONITA BEACH RD E Main S T Oil Well RD Collier BLVDSR 29I75 FSB CRB EMC MCB FKC CSB MGG HBM-N HBM-S MJC BRN CYC SPO OSB D2C CCB LCB LMB GRE GCB C4C TTC ARS IDO PRC D1C RCB HCB WBB OTC UIB-W ARN UIB-E PLM 9CC 9CN NPN EBC NPS ILB QWP GTB NPW WBC WPOPSB µ0 1 2 3 Miles Legend Allowable Discharge Rates 9CN, 951 Canal North Basin, 0.11 (cfs/ac) ARN, Airport Road North Canal Basin, 0.04 (cfs/ac) ARS, Airport Road South Canal Basin, 0.06 (cfs/ac) C4C, C-4 Canal Basin, 0.11 (cfs/ac) CCB, Corkscrew Canal Basin, 0.04 (cfs/ac) CRB, Cocohatchee River Canal Basin, 0.04 (cfs/ac) CYC, Cypress Canal Basin, 0.06 (cfs/ac) D1C, Harvey Canal Basin, 0.06 (cfs/ac) D2C, I-75 Canal Basin, 0.06 (cfs/ac) FKC-N, Faka-Union Canal Basin-N, 0.09 (cfs/ac) GRE, Gordon River Extension Basin, 0.09 (cfs/ac) HBM-N, Henderson Creek - Belle Meade Basin North, 0.06 (cfs/ac) HBM-S, Henderson Creek - Belle Meade Basin South, 0.04 (cfs/ac) IDO, Imperial Drainage Outlet Basin, 0.12 (cfs/ac) LCB, Lely Canal Basin, 0.06 (cfs/ac) LMB, Lely Manor Canal Basin, 0.06 (cfs/ac) MGG, Main Golden Gate Canal Basin, 0.04 (cfs/ac) PLM, Palm River Canal Basin, 0.13 (cfs/ac) PRC, Pine Ridge Canal Basin, 0.13 (cfs/ac) UIB-E, Urban Immokalee Basin East, 0.05 (cfs/ac) UIB-W, Urban Immokalee Basin West, 0.10 (cfs/ac) WBB, Wiggins Bay Outlet Basin, 0.13 (cfs/ac) All Other Basins (0.15 cfs/ac) Figure 5: Collier County Basins with Restricted Allowable Discharge Rates Map Collier County Restricted Basin Discharge Rate Map Page 40 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1580 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Table 5: Collier County Basins Basin ID Name Area (Acres) 1 9CC 951 Canal Central Basin 835 2 9CN 951 Canal North Basin** 828 3 ARN Airport Road North Canal Basin ** 1,717 4 ARS Airport Road South Canal Basin ** 3,124 5 BRC Barron River Basin 27,635 6 BRN Barron River Canal Basin (North) 16,873 7 C4C C-4 Canal Basin** 3,582 8 CCB Corkscrew Canal Basin** 6,466 9 CSB Corkscrew Slough Basin 28,016 10 CSB Cocohatchee River Canal Basin ** 90,389 11 CYC Cypress Canal Basin** 10,885 12 D1C Harvey Canal Basin ** 2,478 13 D2C I-75 Canal Basin** 8,489 14 EBC East Branch Cocohatchee 382 15 EMC Merritt Canal Basin 43,772 16 FKC Faka-Union Canal Basin** 35,581 17 FSB Fakahatchee Strand Basin 146,611 18 GCB Green Canal Basin 5,082 19 GHS Gator Hook Strand Basin 262,969 20 GRE Gordon River Extension Basin** 5,064 21 GTB Gateway Triangle Basin 273 22 HCB Haldeman Creek Basin 1,830 23 HBM-N Henderson Creek – Belle Meade Basin North** 31,134 24 HBM-S Henderson Creek – Belle Meade Basin South** 24,395 25 IDO Imperial Drainage Outlet Basin** 2,528 26 ILB Imperial West Landmark FPL Basin 275 27 L28 L-28 Tieback Basin 118,960 28 LCB Lely Canal Basin ** 5,853 29 LMB Lely Manor Canal Basin** 5,306 30 MCB Miscellaneous Coastal Basins 189,172 31 MGG Main Golden Gate Canal Basin** 29,376 32 MJC Miller Canal Basin 16,086 33 NPN Naples Park North Basin 429 34 NPS Naples Park South Basin 352 35 NPW Naples Park West Basin 279 36 OSB Okaloacoochee Slough Basin 146,766 37 OTC Orange Tree Canal Basin 2,029 38 PLM Palm River Canal Basin** 982 39 PRC Pine Ridge Canal Basin** 2,659 40 PSB Palm Street Basin 65 41 QWP Quail West Phase II 319 42 RCB Rock Creek Basin 1,884 43 SPO Seminole Park Outlet Basin 10,752 44 TRB Turner River Canal Basin 316,480 45 TTC Tamiami Trail Canal Basin 4,611 46 UIB-E Urban Immokalee Basin East** 1,691 47 UIB-W Urban Immokalee Basin West** 2,459 48 WBB Wiggins Bay Outlet Basin ** 2,308 49 WBC West Branch Cocohatchee River Basin 249 50 WPO Winter Park Outlet Basin 173 ** Basins with restricted discharge rates Page 41 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1581 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COUNTY WATER - SEWER DISTRICT − POTABLE WATER SYSTEM CONTENTS • POTABLE WATER SYSTEM 2019 AUIR FACILITY SUMMARY INTRODUCTION • LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOSS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE AREA (TABLE, NOTES • COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT - CURRENT AND FUTURE POTABLE WATER SERVICE AREAS (MAP) • COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT - WATER SERVICE JURISDICTION (MAP) • FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN NORTHEAST COLLIER COUNTY (MAP) • COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT - SYSTEM UTILIZATION AND DIMINISHING CAPACITY REPORT (“CHECKBOOK”) • EXHIBIT ‘A’ - SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS • APPPENDIX “H” - FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 42 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1582 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Facility Type: Collier County Water-Sewer District – Potable Water System Facilities Level of Service Standard:120 gallons per capita day (gpcd)(1) Capacity: Total Permitted Treatment Capacity, FY 21 52.00 MGD Total Operational Treatment Capacity, FY 21 48.00 MGD Required Treatment Capacity, FY 21 34.98 MGD Total Permitted Treatment Capacity, FY 30 54.88 MGD Total Operational Treatment Capacity, FY 30 50.88 MGD Required Treatment Capacity, FY 30 42.04 MGD Expenditures FY21-FY25 (2) Debt Service $49,163,500 Expansion Related Projects - Other $45,725,000 Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects - Other $145,560,000 Departmental Capital $3,851,000 Reserve for Contingencies - Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $14,558,000 (3) TOTAL $258,857,500 Existing Revenue Sources FY21-FY25 Water System Development Fees / Impact Fees $32,000,000 Bonds $45,725,000 State Revolving Fund Loans $0 Water Capital Account $3,851,000 Rate Revenue $177,281,500 TOTAL $258,857,500 Surplus or (Deficit) for Five Year Program $0 Recommended Action: Conclusion: (1) (2) (3)As per Florida Statutes Section 129.01(c), contingency reserves are up to 10% of expenses. Per the most recent Board-approved rate study, which reduced the Equivalent Residential Connection (ERC) value from 350 to 300 GPD, and dividing by an average household size of 2.5 persons To ensure adequate treatment capacity for growth within the jurisdictional boundary of the Collier County Water- Sewer District, expansion related projects commenced in FY 2019 based on the Level of Service Standard, population projections and capacity as shown in the AUIR. That the BCC find the Collier County Water-Sewer District Potable Water System in compliance with concurrency requirements found in FS Section 163, the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Code; and that it approve the proposed 2020 CCWSD Potable Water System Facilities AUIR and adopt the CIE update for FY21-FY25. 2020 AUIR FACILITY SUMMARY POTABLE WATER SYSTEM FACILITIES The CIE is consistent with the Board-approved FY21 budget. Page 43 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1583 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 44 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1584 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) A. B. C. D. Project reactivation is in anticipation of the quantity of large developments going through different stages of the Growth Management Department review process. The need for readiness is also supported by the “Collier County Water- Sewer District System Utilization and Diminishing Capacity Report” (the “Checkbook”), which compares available treatment capacity to potential demand from undeveloped permitted uses in Board-approved planned unit developments (PUDs). The Checkbook uses the historical maximum 3-day average daily demand and monthly average daily demand from the last 10 years as baseline scenarios. Unbuilt future commitments are then multiplied by standard peaking factors and added to the baselines to arrive at worst-case scenarios for future operational requirements. Currently, the Checkbook reports that if all active Board-approved PUDs were built-out, the regional potable water system would have a 6% surplus in permitted treatment capacity. The BEBR population numbers are adjusted using data from the Collier Interactive Growth Model, as produced and maintained by Metro Forecasting Models, LLC, including estimates for the Northeast and Golden Gate City Water Service Areas, where growth rate has not been established or only a portion of the population is served. Collier County Government POTABLE WATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) Public Utilities Department The Public Utilities Department’s proposed 2020 Potable Water System Treatment Facilities AUIR is based on permanent population estimates and projections for the potable water service area prepared by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section on June 9, 2020. Populations are based on using the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) Medium Range growth rate through 2030. Concurrency is shown for 10 years for the current service area. This conforms with the State mandated CIE, concurrency regulations, and other Collier County Departments' AUIR submittals. The Public Utilities Department has commenced new master plans for water, wastewater, and irrigation quality water under Contract # 18-7370, with an anticipated completion in FY 2021. These plans will confirm level of service (LOS) standards and the timing of capacity needs. For this AUIR, LOS standards have been reduced in accordance with the most recent Board-approved rate study. INTRODUCTION On September 11, 2018, as Agenda Item 17.F, the Board adopted a resolution expanding the CCWSD's service area to coincide with the unincorporated area permitted by Chapter 2003-353, Laws of Florida. This "jurisdictional boundary," as shown on the map entitled "Collier County Water-Sewer District Current and Future Potable Water Service Areas," encompasses the villages planned in the Northeast Service Area, including three villages in the Big Cypress Stewardship District (Rivergrass, Longwater, and Bellmar), the adjacent Hyde Park Village, and Immokalee Road Rural Village, all depicted on the preceding service area map. Notes To support forecasted growth in the Northeast Service Area, an interim 0.875 MGD water treatment plant will be added followed by incremental 1 MGD expansions as dictated by demand. This facility will be sited on the 147-acre County- owned Northeast Utility Facilities (NEUF) property at the east end of 39th Ave NE. New regional plant construction is anticipated outside the AUIR planning horizon. The eventual addition of a third regional water treatment plant will provide the needed reliability to serve the expanded CCWSD. This will reduce the high and wide-ranging demands on the existing two plants and will allow for rehabilitation and replacement. 100% design documents were completed in 2010. The NEUF program has been reactivated, starting with updating the design criteria (FY 2018) and modifying the design plans to conform with current technologies (FY 2028). Page 45 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1585 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County Government POTABLE WATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) Public Utilities Department INTRODUCTION Recommendation The Public Utilities Department’s staff recommends that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners approve the 2020 CCWSD Potable Water System Treatment Facilities AUIR. The 2020 Potable Water System AUIR is presented as a snapshot of concurrency conditions. The CCWSD is in compliance with concurrency requirements for FY 2021 and FY 2022, as required by FS Section 163, the Collier County Comprehensive Plan, and the Land Development Code. Page 46 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1586 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Required Percent Permanent Treatment Total Total Retained of Total Fiscal Population Capacity New Permitted Operational Operational Permitted Year Served at Max. Treatment Treatment Treatment Treatment Capacity on Oct. 1 TDADD Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity (Max. Day) MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD 2016 175,399 27.4 52.00 48.00 20.6 55% 2017 179,713 28.0 52.00 48.00 20.0 56% 2018 190,110 29.7 52.75 48.75 19.1 58% 2019 213,170 33.3 52.00 48.00 14.7 66% 2020 219,500 34.2 52.00 48.00 13.8 68% 2021 224,218 35.0 52.00 48.00 13.0 70% 2022 228,655 35.7 0.88 52.88 48.88 13.2 70% 2023 233,181 36.4 52.88 48.88 12.5 71% 2024 239,206 37.3 52.88 48.88 11.6 73% 2025 245,325 38.3 52.88 48.88 10.6 75% 2026 250,975 39.2 1.00 53.88 49.88 10.7 75% 2027 256,110 40.0 53.88 49.88 9.9 77% 2028 261,301 40.8 53.88 49.88 9.1 79% 2029 265,682 41.4 53.88 49.88 8.4 80% 2030 269,503 42.0 1.00 54.88 50.88 8.8 80% LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE AREA 9/23/2020 Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) POTABLE WATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES Page 47 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1587 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Notes (References are to the column numbers on previous page) 1. 2. 3. 4. 2030 Comments and Cost Estimates $2M 1 MGD expansion to the interim water treatment plant at the NEUF site to facilitate development in the Northeast Water Service Area, beginning in FY 2023 and online by FY 2024 $5M 0.875 MGD interim water treatment plant at the NEUF site, repurposing equipment from the decommissioned Golden Gate WTP, to facilitate development in the Northeast Water Service Area, beginning in FY 2021 and online by FY 2022 0.875 MGD2022 Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) POTABLE WATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE AREA 9/23/2020 2026 1 MGD Required Treatment Capacity at Max. TDADD is obtained by multiplying the Permanent Population Served on Oct. 1 by 120 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) and by a maximum 3-day daily demand (TDADD) peaking factor of 1.3 and is expressed in million gallons per day (MGD). 120 gpcd is the established Level of Service (LOS) Standard for the Potable Water Service Area, as adopted by the Board in the most recent rate study, and 1.3 is the TDADF peaking factor per the 2014 Water, Wastewater, Irrigation Quality Water and Bulk Potable Water Master/CIP Plan adopted with the 2015 CCWSD Wastewater Treatment Systems AUIR, as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on November 10, 2015. New Treatment Capacity is the additional treatment capacity in million gallons per day (MGD) placed into service by the start of the fiscal year through plant construction/expansion. Timing and capacity are tentative and may be adjusted with updates in development forecasts and adoption of developer agreements: 1 MGD $2M 1 MGD expansion to the interim water treatment plant at the NEUF site to facilitate development in the Northeast Water Service Area, beginning in FY 2025 and online by FY 2026 Fiscal Year starts October 1 and ends September 30. New Treatment Capacity Permanent Population Served on Oct. 1. Estimates and projections for the served area were prepared by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section on June 9, 2020. Populations are based on the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) Medium Range growth rate applied through 2030. Permanent population is used in accordance with the Board adopted 2014 Water, Wastewater, Irrigation Quality Water and Bulk Potable Water Master/CIP Plan. The population projections include the NE Utility (formerly Orangetree Utilities - OTU) WTP service area beginning in FY 2018 and the Golden Gate City service area (approximately 4 square miles) beginning in FY 2019 based on acquisition dates during FY 2017 and FY 2018 respectively. The CCWSD presently supplies potable water to a population of approximately 17,120 in Golden Gate City. Based on the implementation plan outlined in the Board adopted "Technical Feasibility Study for Acquisition of FGUA Water and Wastewater Assets in Golden Gate," and using revised population figures from the Collier Interactive Growth Model, Phase 2 will increase the population served to 26,705 within 10 years after acquisition. At least 138 new water customers have been connected since system acquisition in March 2018, increasing the total number of water customers in Golden Gate City from 3,687 to 3,825 as of January 2020. Additional water customers are being connected on an individual basis where existing infrastructure is available. Larger system expansion is anticipated through a coordinated effort with the Growth Management Department. Fiscal Year Page 48 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1588 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) POTABLE WATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE AREA 9/23/2020 5. 6. 7. 8. Percent of Total Permitted Capacity (Max. Day) is the total maximum-day quantity of finished water produced by all treatment plants connected to the water system as a percentage of Total Permitted Treatment Capacity. Per FAC 62-555.348, source/treatment/storage capacity analysis reporting to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is triggered once maximum-day demand exceeds 75% of Total Permitted Treatment Capacity, as plotted in the chart on the next page. In accordance with the Board adopted 2014 Water, Wastewater, Irrigation Quality Water and Bulk Potable Water Master/CIP Plan, Total Operational Treatment Capacity must be sufficient for the max. TDADD. Retained Operational Treatment Capacity is the Total Operational Treatment Capacity (See Note 6) minus the Required Treatment Capacity at Max. TDADD. Total Operational Treatment Capacity (See Note 6) is the Total Permitted Treatment Capacity less 4 MGD, the treatment capacity of a lime softening reactor/clarifier, which could be out of service during a period of peak demand, as plotted in the chart on the next page. Capacity in FY 2018 increased by 0.75 MGD (as currently sited) because Orangetree Utilities (OTU) was integrated into the CCWSD on March 1, 2017 (during FY 2017), but decreased the following fiscal year due to the water treatment plant being decommissioned on August 13, 2018. Twin Eagles potable water services transitioned from the NE Utility WTP (former OTU) to the CCWSD Regional potable water system on December 18, 2017. All customers within the Orangetree PUD and the Orange Blossom Ranch PUD as well as the Corkscrew Elementary/Middle and the Palmetto Ridge High public school campuses were diverted through reliability interconnects over the course of FY 2018. Acquisition of the Golden Gate City Utility from the Florida Governmental Utility Authority occurred on March 1, 2018. Existing Golden Gate City Utility potable water facilities include a 2.1 MGD water treatment plant; however, no additional capacity is stated because this area is now served by the nearby CCWSD regional potable water system. Unused Golden Gate City Utility assets are being repurposed and/or decommissioned, depending on condition. Total Permitted Treatment Capacity is the total permitted finished water treatment capacity at the beginning of the fiscal year in million gallons per day (MGD), including New Treatment Capacity. Page 49 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1589 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) POTABLE WATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR POTABLE WATER SERVICE AREA LOS: 120 GPCD 9/23/2020 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030MGD Fiscal YearTotal Permitted Treatment Capacity Total Operational Treatment Capacity (See Note 6) Required Treatment Capacity at Max. TDADD 75% of Total Permitted Treatment Capacity per FAC 62-555.348 Orangetree Utility Integration Golden Gate City Utility Acquisition Orangetree WTP Decommissioned 0.875 MGD Interim WTP at NEUF 1 MGD Interim WTP Expansion 1 MGD Interim WTP Expansion Page 50 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1590 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) POTABLE WATER SYSTEM - WELLFIELD FACILITIES SUMMARY The wells in the Golden Gate Wellfield have an average production rate of 1.267 MGD. In order to produce the 26.5 MGD of raw water necessary to run the water treatment processes at maximum capacity, a minimum of 12 wells are required. The two treatment processes produce a combined total of 24 MGD of potable water with a combined efficiency of 91%. A total of 26.5 MGD of raw water is needed to operate the two processes at maximum capacity. The SCRWTP utilizes a lime softening water treatment process that produces a maximum of 12 MGD of potable water. The treatment process is 97% efficient. The NCRWTP utilizes a membrane filtration (MF) water treatment process that produces a maximum of 12 million gallons per day (MGD) of potable water. The treatment process is 85% efficient (i.e. produces 85 gallons of potable water for every 100 gallons raw water withdrawn from the aquifer). Raw fresh water is provided to both the North County Regional Water Treatment Plant (NCRWTP) and the South County Regional Water Treatment Plant (SCRWTP) from the Golden Gate Wellfield. The wellfield has a current inventory of 36 wells that terminate in the Lower Tamiami Aquifer. 10 additional wells are scheduled to be constructed in the next 10 years. 9/23/2020 Northeast Service Area (NESA) Wellfield A Minimum Reliability Standard (MRS) of 20% is used for fresh water wells (1 reliability well for every 5 production wells). At full treatment capacity, the MRS requires 15 wells. There is one existing wellfield that supplies fresh water to the two regional plants and a small existing wellfield that supplies fresh water to the NE Utility WTP. Another small wellfield will be built to serve the future NERWTP. Each is discussed in more detail below. Golden Gate Wellfield FRESH WATER The NESA Wellfield has a current inventory of 3 wells that terminate in the Lower Tamiami Aquifer. The wells in the NESA Wellfield have an average production rate of 0.432 MGD. They will be repurposed for an interim WTP at the NEUF site, the first phase of which is to be online in FY 2022. 1 supplemental well will be constructed to achieve full treatment capacity of the initial phase of the interim WTP. Page 51 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1591 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) POTABLE WATER SYSTEM - WELLFIELD FACILITIES SUMMARY 9/23/2020 The wells in the North RO Wellfield have an average production rate of 1.066 MGD. In order to produce the 10.7 MGD of raw water necessary to run the water treatment process at maximum capacity, a minimum of 11 wells are required. The NCRWTP utilizes a low-pressure reverse osmosis (RO) water treatment process that produces a maximum of 8 MGD of potable water. The treatment process is 75% efficient. 10.7 MGD of raw water is needed at full treatment capacity. The North RO Wellfield supplies brackish water to the NCRWTP from 25 wells that terminate in the mid- and lower- Hawthorn aquifers. There are two separate wellfields that independently provide brackish water to the two regional plants. Another small wellfield will be built to serve the future NERWTP. Each is discussed in more detail below. Northeast IE Wellfield North RO Wellfield BRACKISH WATER Raw fresh water from the Lower Tamiami and/or Hawthorn Zone 1 aquifers will be provided to the NERWTP from the Northeast IE Wellfield. 3 wells will be constructed for the second and third phases of the interim WTP at the NEUF site. The first phase of the permanent facility will be completed outside the planning horizon of this AUIR. The second and third phases of the interim WTP at the NEUF site will utilize an ion exchange (IE) water treatment process that will produce a maximum of 2 MGD of potable water. The treatment process will be 82% efficient (i.e. will produce 82 gallons of potable water for every 100 gallons raw water withdrawn from the aquifer). The wells in the Northeast IE Wellfield will have an average production rate of 1.440 MGD. In order to produce the 2.44 MGD of raw water necessary to run the Phase 3 interim water treatment process at maximum capacity, a minimum of 2 wells would be required. An MRS of 20% is used for fresh water wells (1 reliability well for every 5 production wells). At full treatment capacity, the MRS would require 3 wells for the interim WTP at the NEUF site. An MRS of 33% is used for brackish water wells (1 reliability well for every 3 production wells). A total of 15 wells are needed to meet the MRS at full treatment capacity. No additional wells are scheduled to be constructed in the next 10 years, however 3 high-TDS wells that are presently inactive will be reactivated in FY 2024. (See note 4.) Page 52 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1592 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) POTABLE WATER SYSTEM - WELLFIELD FACILITIES SUMMARY 9/23/2020 Northeast RO Wellfield The South RO Wellfield supplies brackish water to the NCRWTP from 45 wells that terminate in the mid- and lower- Hawthorn aquifers. South RO Wellfield The CCWSD's existing wellfields have capacities in excess of the minimum reliability standards based upon the population estimates and projections for the regional potable water system service area, and future wellfields of reliable capacities will be timely completed in support of the interim WTP at the NEUF site. The SCRWTP utilizes a low-pressure RO water treatment process that produces a maximum of 20 MGD of potable water. The treatment process is 75% efficient. 26.7 MGD of raw water is needed at full treatment capacity. The wells in the South RO Wellfield have an average production rate of 1.069 MGD. In order to produce the 26.7 MGD of raw water necessary to run the water treatment process at maximum capacity, a minimum of 25 wells are required. An MRS of 33% is used for brackish water wells (1 reliability well for every 3 production wells). A total of 34 wells are needed to meet the MRS at full treatment capacity. No additional wells are scheduled to be constructed in the next 10 years. CONCLUSION Raw brackish water will be provided to the NERWTP from the Northeast RO Wellfield. The first phase of the permanent facility will be completed outside the planning horizon of this AUIR but will include 3 wells that terminate in the lower Hawthorn aquifer. Phase 1 of the NERWTP will utilize a low-pressure RO water treatment process that will produce a maximum of 1.25 MGD of potable water. The treatment process will be 75% efficient (i.e. will produce 75 gallons of potable water for every 100 gallons raw water withdrawn from the aquifer). The wells in the Northeast RO Wellfield will have an average production rate of 1.440 MGD. In order to produce the 1.67 MGD of raw water necessary to run the water treatment process at maximum capacity, a minimum of 2 wells will be required. An MRS of 33% is used for brackish water wells (1 reliability well for every 3 production wells). At full treatment capacity, the MRS would require 3 wells. Page 53 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1593 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Required Golden North South Northeast Northeast Finished Gate RO RO NESA IE RO Total Fiscal Water Wellfield Wellfield Wellfield Wellfield Wellfield Wellfield Wellfield Year for Max. Reliable Reliable Reliable Reliable Reliable Reliable Reliable TDADD Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD 2016 27.4 24.00* 8.00* 20.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.00 2017 28.0 24.00* 8.00* 20.00* 0.75* 0.00 0.00 52.75 2018 29.7 24.00* 8.00* 20.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.00 2019 33.3 24.00* 8.00* 20.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.00 2020 34.2 24.00* 8.00* 20.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.00 2021 35.0 24.00* 8.00* 20.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.00 2022 35.7 24.00* 8.00* 20.00* 0.88* 0.00 0.00 52.88 2023 36.4 24.00* 8.00* 20.00* 0.88* 0.00 0.00 52.88 2024 37.3 24.00* 8.00* 20.00* 0.88* 0.00 0.00 52.88 2025 38.3 24.00* 8.00* 20.00* 0.88* 0.00 0.00 52.88 2026 39.2 24.00* 8.00* 20.00* 0.88* 1.00* 0.00 53.88 2027 40.0 24.00* 8.00* 20.00* 0.88* 1.00* 0.00 53.88 2028 40.8 24.00* 8.00* 20.00* 0.88* 1.00* 0.00 53.88 2029 41.4 24.00* 8.00* 20.00* 0.88* 1.00* 0.00 53.88 2030 42.0 24.00* 8.00* 20.00* 0.88* 2.00* 0.00 54.88 9/23/2020 Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) POTABLE WATER SYSTEM - WELLFIELD FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE AREA An asterisk (*) indicates where wellfield reliable capacity is limited by the capacity of the associated treatment process.Page 54 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1594 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Notes (References are to the column numbers on previous page) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE AREA Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) POTABLE WATER SYSTEM - WELLFIELD FACILITIES Required Finished Water for Max. TDADD - See note 3 in LOS standard assessment for treatment facilities. Golden Gate Wellfield Reliable Capacity is the pumping capacity of the Golden Gate Wellfield adjusted by an average plant efficiency (ratio of finished water to raw water) of 91% (97% for SCRWTP lime softening and 75% for NCRWTP Low Pressure Reverse Osmosis, each process at 12 MGD treatment capacity) and a reliability standard of 1 reliability well for every 5 production wells (i.e. 5/6 of the total number of wells operating). The current number of wells in the Golden Gate Wellfield is 36. Well 39 will be online by December 2020, Well 40 will be online by December 2021, and one well will be constructed in each fiscal year thereafter to counteract the loss of raw water production capacity due to age. 9/23/2020 Fiscal Year starts October 1 and ends September 30. South RO Wellfield Reliable Capacity is the pumping capacity of the South RO Wellfield adjusted by an average plant efficiency (ratio of finished water to raw water) of 75% and a reliability standard of 1 reliability well for every 3 production wells (i.e. 3/4 of the total number of wells operating). The current number of wells in the South RO Wellfield is 45. No additional wells are planned. North RO Wellfield Reliable Capacity is the pumping capacity of the North RO Wellfield adjusted by an average plant efficiency (ratio of finished water to raw water) of 75% and a reliability standard of 1 reliability well for every 3 production wells (i.e. 3/4 of the total number of wells operating). The current number of wells in the North RO Wellfield is 25. Wells 1-4 are inactive due to elevated salinity (total dissolved solids, TDS) in the aquifer. Well 4 will be abandoned due to conflict with the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension project. Jacobs Engineering Group was retained in August 2018 to perform a capacity study, sensitivity analysis, and design modifications for the RO treatment process. $2.5M has been programmed into the CIP for those modifications to occur in FY 2024. Wellfield reliable capacity will increase accordingly in FY 2025, assuming Wells 1- 3 are returned to serviceability. Additionally, wells 118 and 119 could be equipped and activated, but these projects were not funded in the CIP due to other priorities. So, there is no associated increase in wellfield capacity within the 10-year planning horizon. Northeast IE Wellfield Reliable Capacity is the pumping capacity of the future Northeast IE Wellfield adjusted by an average plant efficiency (ratio of finished water to raw water) of 82% and a reliability standard of 1 reliability well for every 5 production wells (i.e. 5/6 of the total number of wells operating). 2 wells will be constructed for the 1-MGD, second phase of the interim WTP at the NEUF site to be online in 2026, and 1 well will be constructed for the 1-MGD, third and final phase of the interim WTP to be online in 2030. The interim WTP will be replaced by the first phase of the permanent NERWTP, which will go online beyond the planning horizon of this AUIR. Northeast RO Wellfield Reliable Capacity is the pumping capacity of the future Northeast RO Wellfield adjusted by an average plant efficiency (ratio of finished water to raw water) of 75% and a reliability standard of 1 reliability well for every 3 production wells (i.e. 3/4 of the total number of wells operating). The initial phase of the Northeast RO Wellfield will be constructed beyond the planning horizon of this AUIR. NESA Wellfield Reliable Capacity is the pumping capacity of the NESA Wellfield adjusted by an average plant efficiency (ratio of finished water to raw water) of 82% and a reliability standard of 1 reliability well for every 5 production wells (i.e. 5/6 of the total number of wells operating). 4 wells (3 existing and 1 supplemental) in the NESA Wellfield will be utilized for water supply to the initial phase of the interim WTP at the NEUF site beginning in FY 2022. Page 55 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1595 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE AREA Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) POTABLE WATER SYSTEM - WELLFIELD FACILITIES 9/23/2020 9. GGa NROb SROb NESAa NEIEa NEROb Total Add Add Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells Fresh Brackish 2021 36 25 45 0 0 0 106 6 2022 38 25 45 4 0 0 112 1 2023 39 25 45 4 0 0 113 1 2024 40 25 45 4 0 0 114 1 3 2025 41 28 45 4 0 0 118 3 2026 42 28 45 4 2 0 121 1 2027 43 28 45 4 2 0 122 1 2028 44 28 45 4 2 0 123 1 2029 45 28 45 4 2 0 124 2 2030 46 28 45 4 3 0 126 Net Add'l 10 3 0 4 3 0 20 17 3 aFresh bBrackish Total Wellfield Reliable Capacity is the net reliable capacity of the six wellfields combined. The below table summarizes the total quantity of wells in each wellfield for each plan year: Fiscal Year Page 56 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1596 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) POTABLE WATER SYSTEM - WELLFIELD FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR POTABLE WATER SERVICE AREA LOS: 120 GPCD 9/23/2020 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 MGDFiscal Year Golden Gate Wellfield Reliable Capacity North RO Wellfield Reliable Capacity South RO Wellfield Reliable Capacity Northeast IE Wellfield Reliable Capacity Northeast RO Wellfield Reliable Capacity NESA Wellfield Reliable Capacity Required Finished Water for Max. TDADD Total Wellfield Reliable CapacityPage 57 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1597 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 58 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1598 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Million Gallons per Day (MGD) WATER REGIONAL 1a. 52.000 1b. 48.000 2a. 34.073 2b. 31.981 3a. 13.927 3b. 16.019 4a.SYSTEM AVAILABILITY BASED ON MAX. 3-DAY (Line 3a / Line 1b)29% 4b.SYSTEM AVAILABILITY BASED ON MAX. MONTH (Line 3b / Line 1b)33% CURRENT AVAILABILITY WITHOUT FUTURE COMMITMENTS Existing Permitted Plant Capacity (MADD) Existing Operational Plant Capacity per 2019 AUIR 10-Year Maximum TDADD [1] 10-Year Maximum MADD [2] Current Available Diminishing Capacity (TDADD) (Line 1b - Line 2a) Current Available Diminishing Capacity (MADD) (Line 1b - Line 2b) COLLIER COUNTY WATER - SEWER DISTRICT SYSTEM UTILIZATION AND DIMINISHING CAPACITY REPORT ("CHECKBOOK") REGIONAL POTABLE WATER SYSTEM DATA: Current as of August 17, 2020 INTRODUCTION: The Checkbook uses the historical maximum 3-day average daily demand (TDADD) and monthly average daily demand (MADD) from the last 10 years as baseline scenarios. Unbuilt future commitments are then multiplied by standard peaking factors and added to the baselines to arrive at worst-case scenarios for future operational requirements. CURRENT AVAILABLE CAPACITY (BASED ON HISTORICAL EXTREME EVENT) 17 of 20Page 59 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1599 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COLLIER COUNTY WATER - SEWER DISTRICT SYSTEM UTILIZATION AND DIMINISHING CAPACITY REPORT ("CHECKBOOK") REGIONAL POTABLE WATER SYSTEM DATA: Current as of August 17, 2020 Million Gallons per Day (MGD) WATER REGIONAL 5. 11.074 6a. 2.853 6b. 4.945 7a.SYSTEM AVAILABILITY BASED ON MAX. 3-DAY (Line 6a / Line 1b)6% 7b.SYSTEM AVAILABILITY BASED ON MAX. MONTH (Line 6b / Line 1b)10% Million Gallons per Day (MGD) WATER REGIONAL 8a. 0.000 8b. 0.000 9a. 2.853 9b. 4.945 10a.SYSTEM AVAILABILITY BASED ON MAX. 3-DAY (Line 11a / Line 1b)6% 10b.SYSTEM AVAILABILITY BASED ON MAX. MONTH (Line 11b / Line 1b)10% [1] Mar-19 [2] Mar-20 [3] FOOTNOTES/QUALIFIERS: Line 2a: Mo-Yr of Max. 3-Day Since August 2010 => Line 2b: Mo-Yr of Max. Month Since August 2010 => Capacity requested by outstanding active BCC-approved PUD units, as documented in the most current GMD PUD Master List. Built-out, closed- out, inactive, and discontinued PUD's are not included in line 5; only active PUD's are included. The outstanding PUD units are assumed to be developed before PUD closeout. Level of service for future commitments is defined by the latest rate study. FUTURE AVAILABLE CAPACITY (WITH EXPANSIONS) Expansions Within Next 12 Months (MADD) Expansions Within Next 12-24 Months (MADD) Future Available Capacity (TDADD) (Line 6a + Line 8a + Line 8b) Future Available Capacity (MADD) (Line 6b + Line 8a + Line 8b) FUTURE AVAILABILITY WITH EXPANSIONS PROJECTED AVAILABLE CAPACITY (WITH FUTURE COMMITMENTS) Total BCC-approved Active PUD commitments (Unbuilt per GMD PUD Master List) [3] Projected Available Capacity (TDADD) (Line 3a - Line 5) Projected Available Capacity (MADD) (Line 3b - Line 5) CURRENT AVAILABILITY WITH FUTURE COMMITMENTS 18 of 20Page 60 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1600 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 PUD POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT CIE # PROJECT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL Debt Service $11,443,500 $10,849,500 $9,053,000 $9,050,500 $8,767,000 $49,163,500 Expansion Related Projects - Other $27,725,000 $18,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $45,725,000 Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects - Other $30,000,000 $29,335,000 $28,605,000 $29,535,000 $28,085,000 $145,560,000 Departmental Capital $740,000 $755,000 $770,000 $785,000 $801,000 $3,851,000 Reserve for Contingencies - Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $3,000,000 $2,934,000 $2,861,000 $2,954,000 $2,809,000 $14,558,000 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $72,908,500 $61,873,500 $41,289,000 $42,324,500 $40,462,000 $258,857,500 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL WIF - Water System Development Fees / Impact Fees $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $32,000,000 B1 - Bonds/ Loans $27,725,000 $18,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $45,725,000 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 WCA - Water Capital Account $740,000 $755,000 $770,000 $785,000 $801,000 $3,851,000 REV - Rate Revenue $38,043,500 $36,718,500 $34,119,000 $35,139,500 $33,261,000 $177,281,500 REVENUE TOTAL $72,908,500 $61,873,500 $41,289,000 $42,324,500 $40,462,000 $258,857,500 CIE consistent with Board-approved FY21 budget Reserve for Contingencies - Replacement and Rehabilitation Projects: As per Florida Statues, reserve for contingencies is up to 10% of expenses. NOTE: Collier County has adopted a two-year Concurrency Management System. Figures provided for years three, four and five of this Schedule of Capital Improvements are not part of the Concurrency Management System but must be financially feasible with a dedicated revenue source or an alternative revenue source if the dedicated revenue source is not realized. Revenue sources are estimates only; both the mix of sources and amounts will change when a rate study is conducted. FY 2022 to FY 2025 are 2% increases over each fiscal year (pursuant to CPI adjustments per current Board policy). All years are obtained from the current Collier County Water-Sewer District Financial Statements and Other Reports including Summary of Debt Service requirements to maturity. Total Debt Service amount is split 50/50 between Water and Wastewater. DATA SOURCES: Expansion Related and Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects: FY 2021 is obtained from the 2021 Proposed Budget for R&R projects. Expansion projects require additional funding therefore not included in the budget. FY 2022 to FY 2025 are from the FY 2019 Impact Fee Rate Study. Department Capital: FY 2021 is obtained from the 2021 Proposed Budget, split 50/50 between Water and Wastewater. Debt Service: CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE NOTES 9/23/20205:20 PMPage 61 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1601 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 PUD POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT CIE #PROJECT FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL Debt Service $7,990,000 $7,171,500 $6,947,500 $8,034,000 $7,310,000 $37,453,000 Expansion Related Projects - Generally $5,833,000 $0 $14,667,000 $37,400,000 $0 $57,900,000 Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects - Generally $29,085,000 $27,685,000 $27,435,000 $26,335,000 $25,585,000 $136,125,000 Departmental Capital $817,000 $833,000 $850,000 $867,000 $884,000 $4,251,000 Reserve for Contingencies - Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $2,909,000 $2,769,000 $2,744,000 $2,634,000 $2,559,000 $13,615,000 POTABLE WATER PROJECT TOTALS $46,634,000 $38,458,500 $52,643,500 $75,270,000 $36,338,000 $249,344,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL WIF - Water System Development Fees $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $32,000,000 B1 - Bonds/ Loans $0 $0 $14,667,000 $37,400,000 $0 $52,067,000 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 WCA - Water Capital Account $817,000 $833,000 $850,000 $867,000 $884,000 $4,251,000 REV - Rate Revenue $39,417,000 $31,225,500 $30,726,500 $30,603,000 $29,054,000 $161,026,000 REVENUE TOTAL $46,634,000 $38,458,500 $52,643,500 $75,270,000 $36,338,000 $249,344,000 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE NOTES NOTE: Figures provided for years six through ten are estimates of revenues necessary to support project costs but do not constitute a long-term concurrency system. Revenue sources are estimates only; both the mix of sources and amounts will change when a rate study is conducted. 9/23/20205:20 PMPage 62 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1602 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COUNTY WATER - SEWER DISTRICT − WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS CONTENTS • 2019 AUIR FACILITY SUMMARY - WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM FACILITIES • INTRODUCTION • LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR SOUTH COUNTY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY (SCWRF) SERVICE AREA (TABLE, NOTES & CHART) • LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR NORTH COUNTY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY (NCWRF) SERVICE AREA (TABLE, NOTES & CHART • COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT - CURRENT AND FUTURE WASTEWATER SERVICE AREAS MAP • COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT - WASTEWATER SERVICE JURISDICTION (MAP) • FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN NORTHEAST COLLIER COUNTY (MAP) • COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT - SYSTEM UTILIZATION AND DIMINISHING CAPACITY REPORT (“CHECKBOOK”) • EXHIBIT “A” - SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS • APPENDIZ “H” - FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 63 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1603 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Facility Type: Collier County Water-Sewer District – Wastewater Treatment System Level of Service Standard:80 gallons per capita day (gpcd)(1) Capacity: South Service Area (SCWRF) Permitted/Operational Treatment Capacity, FY21 16.00 MGD Required Treatment Capacity, FY21 13.02 MGD Permitted/Operational Treatment Capacity, FY30 16.00 MGD Required Treatment Capacity, FY30 14.88 MGD Capacity: North Service Area (NCWRF) Permitted/Operational Treatment Capacity, FY21 26.35 MGD Required Treatment Capacity, FY21 17.37 MGD Permitted/Operational Treatment Capacity, FY30 28.35 MGD Required Treatment Capacity, FY30 19.37 MGD Capacity: Northeast Service Area (NEWRF) Permitted/Operational Treatment Capacity, FY21 1.50 MGD Required Treatment Capacity, FY21 0.00 MGD Permitted/Operational Treatment Capacity, FY30 5.50 MGD Required Treatment Capacity, FY30 0.83 MGD Expenditures FY21-FY25 (2) Debt Service $49,163,500 Expansion Related Projects - Other $25,225,000 Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects - Other $160,205,000 Departmental Capital $3,851,000 Reserve for Contingencies - Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $16,022,000 (3) TOTAL $254,466,500 Existing Revenue Sources FY21-FY25 Wastewater System Development Fees / Impact Fees $33,000,000 Bonds $15,225,000 State Revolving Fund Loans $0 Wastewater Capital Account - Transfers $3,851,000 Rate Revenue $202,390,500 TOTAL $254,466,500 Surplus or (Deficit) for Five Year Program $0 Recommended Action: 2020 AUIR FACILITY SUMMARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM FACILITIES That the BCC find the Collier County Water-Sewer District Wastewater Treatment System in compliance with concurrency requirements found in FS Section 163, the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Code; and that it approve the proposed 2020 CCWSD Wastewater Treatment Facilities AUIR and adopt the CIE Update for FY21-FY25. Page 64 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1604 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Conclusion: (1) (2) (3)As per Florida Statutes Section 129.01(c), contingency reserves are up to 10% of expenses Per the most recent Board-approved rate study, which reduced the Equivalent Residential Connection (ERC) value from 250 to 200 GPD, and dividing by an average household size of 2.5 persons The CIE is consistent with the Board-approved FY21 budget. To ensure adequate treatment capacity for growth within the jurisdictional boundary of the Collier County Water- Sewer District, expansion related projects commenced in FY 2019 based on the Level of Service Standard, population projections and capacity as shown in the AUIR. Page 65 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1605 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 66 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1606 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) A. B. C. D. E. The Public Utilities Department’s (PUD's) proposed 2020 CCWSD Wastewater System Treatment Facilities AUIR is based on permanent population estimates and projections for the CCWSD's wastewater service areas prepared by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section on June 9, 2020. Populations are based on using the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) Medium Range growth rate through 2030. Notes The BEBR population numbers are adjusted using data from the Collier Interactive Growth Model, as produced and maintained by Metro Forecasting Models, LLC, including estimates for the Northeast and Golden Gate City Wastewater Service Areas, where growth rate has not been established or only a portion of the population is served. WASTEWATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES Public Utilities Department Collier County Government INTRODUCTION 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) Concurrency is shown for 10 years for the current service area. This conforms with the State mandated CIE, concurrency regulations, and other Collier County Departments' AUIR submittals. To serve the Orangetree and Orange Blossom Ranch PUDs, a new master pump station and associated force main improvements were completed in FY 2019 that allow the diversion of peak flows from the Northeast Sub-Regional (former Orangetree) Wastewater Treatment Plant to the North County Water Reclamation Facility (NCWRF). (The Orangetree PUD includes Waterways of Naples, Orangetree, Valencia Lakes, Neighborhood Shoppes at Orangetree, and Valencia Golf & Country Club as well as the Corkscrew Elementary/Middle and Palmetto Ridge High campuses.) On September 11, 2018, as Agenda Item 17.F, the Board adopted a resolution expanding the CCWSD's service area to coincide with the unincorporated area permitted by Chapter 2003-353, Laws of Florida. This "jurisdictional boundary," as shown on the map entitled, "Collier County Water-Sewer District Current and Future Wastewater Service Areas," encompasses the villages planned in the Northeast Service Area, including three villages in the Big Cypress Stewardship District (Rivergrass, Longwater, and Bellmar), the adjacent Hyde Park Village, and Immokalee Road Rural Village, all depicted on the preceding service area map. The new regional water reclamation facility at the Northeast Utility Facilities (NEUF) site will support forecasted growth in the northeast region of the county. The NEUF is sited on 147 acres of County owned land at the east end of 39th Ave NE. 100% design documents were completed in 2010. The NEUF program has been reactivated, starting with updating the design criteria (FY 2018) and modifying the design plans to conform with current technologies (FY 2018- 2019). Design-build construction of a 1.5 MGD interim WWTP and associated pipelines began in 2019, due to be complete in 2021. This will be followed by a 4 MGD initial phase of the Northeast Water Reclamation Facility (NEWRF) to be online by FY 2030, depending on developer commitments. The addition of a third water reclamation facility provides the needed reliability to serve the expanded CCWSD. This will reduce the high and wide-ranging flows to the existing two plants and will allow for rehabilitation and replacement. The Golden Gate wastewater service area will expand when needed to accommodate flow from current and future development in Activity Center #9 and the surrounding area north of I-75. A force main is being extended along Magnolia Pond Drive and Tropicana Boulevard, between the high school and the plant, in preparation for the future diversion, which will relieve capacity constraints at the South County Water Reclamation Facility (SCWRF) and in the force mains along Collier Boulevard and Davis Boulevard. Completion of the force main extension is anticipated in February 2021. To facilitate this service area expansion as well as anticipated redevelopment of the Golden Gate Parkway corridor and the Golden Gate Country Club (acquired by the County in July 2019) and the conversion of existing septic system users within the existing service area, the Golden Gate City WWTP will undergo a 2-4 MGD expansion to be completed in FY 2024. Page 67 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1607 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) WASTEWATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES Public Utilities Department Collier County Government INTRODUCTION 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) F. Recommendation The Public Utilities Department’s staff recommends that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners approve the 2020 CCWSD Wastewater System Treatment Facilities AUIR. The 2020 Wastewater System AUIR is presented as a snapshot of concurrency conditions. The CCWSD is in compliance with concurrency requirements for FY 2021 and FY 2022, as required by FS Section 163, the Collier County Comprehensive Plan, and the Land Development Code. The Public Utilities Department has commenced new, individual master plans for water, wastewater, and irrigation quality water under Contract # 18-7370, with completion anticipated in FY 2021. These plans will confirm level of service (LOS) standards and the timing of capacity needs. For this AUIR, LOS standards have been reduced in accordance with the most recent Board-approved rate study. Project reactivation is in anticipation of the quantity of large developments going through different stages of the Growth Management Department review process. The need for readiness is also supported by the “Collier County Water- Sewer District System Utilization and Diminishing Capacity Report” (the “Checkbook”), which compares available treatment capacity to potential flow from undeveloped permitted uses in Board-approved planned unit developments (PUDs). The Checkbook uses the historical maximum 3-day average daily flow and monthly average daily flow from the last 10 years as baseline scenarios. Unbuilt future commitments are then multiplied by standard peaking factors and added to the baselines to arrive at worst-case scenarios for future operational requirements. Currently, the Checkbook reports that if all active Board-approved PUDs were built-out, the SCWRF would have a 23% deficit in and the NCWRF would have a 1% surplus of permitted treatment capacity. Page 68 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1608 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Percent of Permanent Max. 3-Day Permitted / Retained Max. Required Permitted Fiscal Population Average New Operational Operational TDADF Treatment Capacity Year Served Daily Flow Treatment Treatment Treatment Diverted to Capacity at Max. on Oct. 1 (TDADF)Capacity Capacity Capacity NCWRF at SCWRF MADF MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD 2016 96,338 11.6 16.00 4.4 11.6 72% 2017 98,180 11.8 16.00 4.2 11.8 74% 2018 100,021 12.0 16.00 4.0 12.0 75% 2019 102,807 12.3 16.00 3.7 12.3 77% 2020 105,942 12.7 16.00 3.3 12.7 79% 2021 108,492 13.0 16.00 3.0 13.0 81% 2022 110,914 13.3 16.00 2.7 13.3 83% 2023 111,796 13.4 16.00 2.6 13.4 84% 2024 113,824 13.7 16.00 2.3 13.7 85% 2025 115,899 13.9 16.00 2.1 13.9 87% 2026 117,998 14.2 16.00 1.8 14.2 88% 2027 119,447 14.3 16.00 1.7 14.3 90% 2028 120,927 14.5 16.00 1.5 14.5 91% 2029 122,436 14.7 16.00 1.3 14.7 92% 2030 123,979 14.9 16.00 1.1 14.9 93% 9/23/2020 Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) SOUTH COUNTY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY (SCWRF) SERVICE AREA WASTEWATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR Page 69 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1609 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Notes (References are to the column numbers on the previous page.) 1. 2. 3. 4. Fiscal Year NA 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. SOUTH COUNTY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY (SCWRF) SERVICE AREA 9/23/2020 Fiscal Year starts October 1 and ends September 30. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR New Treatment Capacity is the additional treatment capacity in million gallons per day (MGD) placed into service by the start of the fiscal year through plant construction/expansion, as follows: The new villages in the northeast wastewater service area will draw housing demand away from the existing wastewater service areas. Therefore, their population projections are proportionally deducted from the projections for the north and south wastewater service areas. The portion taken from the south wastewater service area is 58 percent. Max. 3-Day Average Daily Flow (TDADF) is obtained by multiplying the Permanent Population Served on Oct. 1 by 80 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) and by a maximum 3-day daily flow (TDADF) peaking factor of 1.5 and is expressed in million gallons per day (MGD). 80 gpcd is the established Level of Service (LOS) Standard for the South Service Area, as adopted by the Board in the most recent rate study, and 1.5 is the TDADF peaking factor per the 2014 Water, Wastewater, Irrigation Quality Water and Bulk Potable Water Master/CIP Plan adopted with the 2015 CCWSD Wastewater Treatment Systems AUIR, as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on November 10, 2015. Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) WASTEWATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES New Treatment Capacity Permanent Population Served on Oct. 1. Estimates and projections for the served area were prepared by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section on June 9, 2020. Populations are based on the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) Medium Range growth rate applied through 2030. Permanent population is used in accordance with the Board adopted 2014 Water, Wastewater, Irrigation Quality Water and Bulk Potable Water Master/CIP Plan. Percent of Permitted Capacity at Max. MADF is the maximum Monthly Average Daily Flow (MADF) as a percentage of Permitted / Operational Treatment Capacity. Per FAC 62-600.405, capacity analysis reporting to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is triggered once MADF exceeds 50% of permitted capacity, as plotted in the chart on the next page. 0 MGD Permitted / Operational Treatment Capacity is the permitted treatment capacity at the beginning of the fiscal year with no deduction for the largest unit being out of service given that the SCWRF is designed for Class I reliability. Permitted / Operational Treatment Capacity is plotted in the chart on the next page. In accordance with the Board adopted 2014 Water, Wastewater, Irrigation Quality Water and Bulk Potable Water Master/CIP Plan, Total Operational Treatment Capacity must be sufficient for the max. TDADF. Retained Operational Treatment Capacity is the Permitted / Operational Treatment Capacity minus the Max. 3-Day Average Daily Flow (TDADF). Any deficit in operational treatment capacity is countered by diverting flow to the NCWRF. Max. TDADF Diverted to NCWRF is the max. TDADF that must be diverted to the NCWRF to avoid exceeding the permitted capacity of the SCWRF. Required Treatment Capacity at SCWRF is equal to the Max. 3-Day Average Daily Flow (TDADF) less the Max. TDADF Diverted to NCWRF and is plotted in the chart on the next page. Comments The SCWRF site is built-out given current treatment technology on-site. Page 70 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1610 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR SOUTH COUNTY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY (SCWRF) SERVICE AREA LOS: 80 gpcd 9/23/2020 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030MGD Fiscal Year Permitted / Operational Treatment Capacity Required Treatment Capacity at SCWRF 50% of Permitted Treatment Capacity per FAC 62-600.405Page 71 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1611 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Percent of Permanent Max. 3-Day Permitted / Retained Max. Required Permitted Fiscal Population Average New Operational Operational TDADF Treatment Capacity Year Served Daily Flow Treatment Treatment Treatment Diverted to Capacity at Max. on Oct. 1 (TDADF)Capacity Capacity Capacity NCWRF at NCWRF MADF MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD 2016 111,836 13.4 24.10 10.7 13.4 56% 2017 114,760 13.8 24.10 10.3 13.8 57% 2018 122,980 14.8 24.85 10.1 14.8 59% 2019 138,984 16.7 26.35 9.7 16.7 63% 2020 142,803 17.1 26.35 9.2 17.1 65% 2021 144,740 17.4 26.35 9.0 17.4 66% 2022 146,579 17.6 26.35 8.8 17.6 67% 2023 149,207 17.9 26.35 8.4 17.9 68% 2024 151,192 18.1 2 28.35 10.2 18.1 64% 2025 153,213 18.4 28.35 10.0 18.4 65% 2026 154,866 18.6 28.35 9.8 18.6 66% 2027 155,909 18.7 28.35 9.6 18.7 66% 2028 156,977 18.8 28.35 9.5 18.8 66% 2029 158,901 19.1 28.35 9.3 19.1 67% 2030 161,432 19.4 28.35 9.0 19.4 68% 9/23/2020 Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) WASTEWATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR NORTH COUNTY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY (NCWRF) SERVICE AREA Page 72 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1612 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Notes (References are to the column numbers on the previous page.) 1. 2. 3. 4. The new villages in the northeast wastewater service area will draw housing demand away from the existing wastewater service areas. Therefore, their population projections are proportionally deducted from the projections for the north and south wastewater service areas. The portion taken from the north wastewater service area is 42 percent. Permanent Population Served on Oct. 1. Estimates and projections for the served area were prepared by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section on June 9, 2020. Populations are based on the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) Medium Range growth rate applied through 2030. Permanent population is used in accordance with the Board adopted 2014 Water, Wastewater, Irrigation Quality Water and Bulk Potable Water Master/CIP Plan. Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) WASTEWATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR NORTH COUNTY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY (NCWRF) SERVICE AREA 9/23/2020 Fiscal Year starts October 1 and ends September 30. 2024 2 MGD 2-4 MGD expansion of the Golden Gate City WWTP to sustain sewer service to existing and future customers in the Golden Gate City and Activity Center #9 areas beginning in FY 2020 through FY 2024. The population projections include the Orangetree wastewater service area beginning in FY 2018 and the Golden Gate wastewater service area beginning in FY 2019 based on acquisition dates during FY 2017 and FY 2018 respectively. The Golden Gate wastewater service area (approximately 4 square miles) presently includes a population of approximately 12,404 residents in Golden Gate City. Based on the implementation plan outlined in the Board adopted "Technical Feasibility Study for Acquisition of FGUA Water and Wastewater Assets in Golden Gate," Phase 3 will increase the population served to 15,000 within 20 years. the start of the fiscal year through plant construction/expansion. Timing and capacity are tentative and may be adjusted with updates in development forecasts and adoption of developer agreements: Fiscal Year New Treatment Capacity Comments and Cost Estimates Max. 3-Day Average Daily Flow (TDADF) is obtained by multiplying the Permanent Population Served on Oct. 1 by 80 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) and by a maximum 3-day daily flow (TDADF) peaking factor of 1.5 and is expressed in million gallons per day (MGD). 80 gpcd is the established Level of Service (LOS) Standard for the South Service Area, as adopted by the Board in the most recent rate study, and 1.5 is the TDADF peaking factor per the 2014 Water, Wastewater, Irrigation Quality Water and Bulk Potable Water Master/CIP Plan adopted with the 2015 CCWSD Wastewater Treatment Systems AUIR, as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on November 10, 2015. New Treatment Capacity is the additional treatment capacity in million gallons per day (MGD) placed into service by Page 73 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1613 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) WASTEWATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR NORTH COUNTY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY (NCWRF) SERVICE AREA 9/23/2020 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.Percent of Permitted Capacity at Max. MADF is the maximum Monthly Average Daily Flow (MADF) as a percentage of Permitted / Operational Treatment Capacity. Per FAC 62-600.405, capacity analysis reporting to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is triggered once MADF exceeds 50% of permitted capacity, as plotted in the chart on the next page. Permitted / Operational Treatment Capacity is the permitted treatment capacity at the beginning of the fiscal year in million gallons per day (MGD) with no deduction for the largest unit being out of service given that the NCWRF is designed for Class I reliability. Permitted / Operational Treatment Capacity is plotted in the chart on the next page. In accordance with the Board adopted 2014 Water, Wastewater, Irrigation Quality Water and Bulk Potable Water Master/CIP Plan, Total Operational Treatment Capacity must be sufficient for the max. TDADF. Retained Operational Treatment Capacity is the Permitted / Operational Treatment Capacity minus the Max. 3-Day Average Daily Flow (TDADF). Required Treatment Capacity at NCWRF is equal to the Max. 3-Day Average Daily Flow (TDADF) plus the Max. TDADF Diverted to NCWRF and is plotted in the chart on the next page. Max. TDADF Diverted to NCWRF is the max. TDADF that must be diverted to the NCWRF to avoid exceeding the permitted capacity of the SCWRF. Capacity increased in FY 2018 because Orangetree Utilities (OTU) was integrated into the CCWSD during FY 2017. Integrated assets include a 0.75 MGD (as currently sited) wastewater treatment plant that will continue operation. Acquisition of the Golden Gate City Utility from the Florida Governmental Utility Authority occurred on March 1, 2018. Acquired assets include a 1.5 MGD wastewater treatment plant that will continue operation. Page 74 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1614 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR NORTH COUNTY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY (NCWRF) SERVICE AREA LOS: 80 gpcd 9/23/2020 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030MGD Fiscal Year Permitted / Operational Treatment Capacity Required Treatment Capacity at NCWRF 50% of Permitted Treatment Capacity per FAC 62-600.405 Golden Gate City Utility Acquisition Orange Tree Utility Integration 2 MGD Golden Gate WWTP ExpansionPage 75 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1615 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Percent of Permanent Max. 3-Day Permitted / Retained Required Permitted Fiscal Population Average New Operational Operational Treatment Capacity Year Served Daily Flow Treatment Treatment Treatment Capacity at Max. on Oct. 1 (TDADF)Capacity Capacity Capacity at NEWRF MADF MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 1.5 1.50 1.5 2022 626 0.1 1.50 1.4 0.1 5% 2023 1,147 0.1 1.50 1.4 0.1 9% 2024 1,565 0.2 1.50 1.3 0.2 13% 2025 1,982 0.2 1.50 1.3 0.2 16% 2026 2,851 0.3 1.50 1.2 0.3 23% 2027 3,871 0.5 1.50 1.0 0.5 31% 2028 4,893 0.6 1.50 0.9 0.6 39% 2029 5,913 0.7 1.50 0.8 0.7 47% 2030 6,933 0.8 4 5.50 4.7 0.8 15% Collier County Government 9/23/2020 Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) WASTEWATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR NORTHEAST WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY (NEWRF) SERVICE AREA Page 76 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1616 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Notes (References are to the column numbers on the previous page.) 1. 2. 3. 4. Max. 3-Day Average Daily Flow (TDADF) is obtained by multiplying the Permanent Population Served on Oct. 1 by 80 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) and by a maximum 3-day daily flow (TDADF) peaking factor of 1.5 and is expressed in million gallons per day (MGD). 80 gpcd is the established Level of Service (LOS) Standard for the South Service Area, as adopted by the Board in the most recent rate study, and 1.5 is the TDADF peaking factor per the 2014 Water, Wastewater, Irrigation Quality Water and Bulk Potable Water Master/CIP Plan adopted with the 2015 CCWSD Wastewater Treatment Systems AUIR, as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on November 10, 2015. 2021 1.5 MGD $28M interim WWTP, storage tanks and associated pipelines at the NEUF site to facilitate development in the northeast region of the county, outside the Orangetree and Orange Blossom Ranch PUDs, beginning in FY 2019 through FY 2021 2030 4 MGD $108M Northeast Water Reclamation Facility (NEWRF) at the Northeast Utility Facilities (NEUF) site to sustain sewer service to customers in the new villages proposed in the Northeast Wastewater Service Area, beginning in FY 2026, to be online by FY 2030 Fiscal Year Comments and Cost Estimates The new villages in the northeast wastewater service area will draw housing demand away from the existing wastewater service areas. Therefore, their population projections are proportionally deducted from the projections for the north and south wastewater service areas (42 percent and 58 percent respectively). New Treatment Capacity is the additional treatment capacity in million gallons per day (MGD) placed into service by the start of the fiscal year through plant construction/expansion. Timing and capacity are tentative and may be adjusted with updates in development forecasts and adoption of developer agreements: 2031 -1.5 MGD The interim WWTP at the NEUF site will be decommissioned once the 4 MGD NEWRF is operational. Equipment taken offline will be repurposed or sold. New Treatment Capacity Permanent Population Served on Oct. 1. Projections for the future northeast wastewater service area were obtained from the Collier Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) for the zones comprising the four planned developments--Hyde Park Village (FKA Winchester Lakes, FKA Collier Lakes), Rivergrass Village (FKA Rural Lands West), Immokalee Road Rural Village (FKA SR 846 Land Trust), and Hogan Island Village. Permanent population is used in accordance with the Board adopted 2014 Water, Wastewater, Irrigation Quality Water and Bulk Potable Water Master/CIP Plan. Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) WASTEWATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR NORTHEAST WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY (NEWRF) SERVICE AREA 9/23/2020 Fiscal Year starts October 1 and ends September 30. Page 77 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1617 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) WASTEWATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR NORTHEAST WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY (NEWRF) SERVICE AREA 9/23/2020 5. 6. 7. 8. Required Treatment Capacity at NEWRF is equal to the Max. 3-Day Average Daily Flow (TDADF) and is plotted in the chart on the next page. Percent of Permitted Capacity at Max. MADF is the maximum Monthly Average Daily Flow (MADF) as a percentage of Permitted / Operational Treatment Capacity. Per FAC 62-600.405, capacity analysis reporting to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is triggered once MADF exceeds 50% of permitted capacity, as plotted in the chart on the next page. Permitted / Operational Treatment Capacity is the permitted treatment capacity at the beginning of the fiscal year in million gallons per day (MGD) with no deduction for the largest unit being out of service given that the NEWRF is designed for Class I reliability. Permitted / Operational Treatment Capacity is plotted in the chart on the next page. In accordance with the Board adopted 2014 Water, Wastewater, Irrigation Quality Water and Bulk Potable Water Master/CIP Plan, Total Operational Treatment Capacity must be sufficient for the max. TDADF. Retained Operational Treatment Capacity is the Permitted / Operational Treatment Capacity minus the Max. 3-Day Average Daily Flow (TDADF). Page 78 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1618 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD ASSESSMENT FOR NORTHEAST WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY (NEWRF) SERVICE AREA LOS: 80 gpcd 9/23/2020 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030MGD Fiscal Year Permitted / Operational Treatment Capacity Required Treatment Capacity at NEWRF 50% of Permitted Treatment Capacity per FAC 62-600.405 1.5 MGD Interim Expansion 4 MGD ExpansionPage 79 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1619 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) City Gate PUD/Activity Center #9 Background: Status: Future Actions: Immokalee Road & Collier Blvd Background: Status: Future Actions: Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) WASTEWATER COLLECTION/TRANSMISSION SYSTEM CONSTRAINTS 9/23/2020 The original design of wastewater transmission facilities along Davis Boulevard did not anticipate service to the areas north of I-75. Proposed growth in Activity Center #9 and the surrounding area may require additional conveyance and treatment capacity. A new force main along Magnolia Pond Drive to the Golden Gate City Wastewater Treatment Plant will provide additional transmission capacity. The project is under construction and planned to be completed in February 2021. Expand the Golden Gate City Wastewater Treatment Plant. The following four areas will have future constrained wastewater conveyance capacity based on current growth patterns. The plan to address each constraint is discussed below and shown on the following "Wastewater Collection/Transmission System Constraints Map" map. To make full use of the capacity of the North County Water Reclamation Facility (NCWRF) for wastewater service to the growing northeast region of Collier County, the 2014 Master Plan/CIP Plan recommended construction of a 24" force main from a new master pump station (MPS 167) at Heritage Bay west along Immokalee Road, then south along Logan Boulevard, then east a short distance along Vanderbilt Beach Road to MPS 104. Once completed, these improvements will relieve the burden on the 12" force main along Immokalee Road, which has become constrained due to extensive development of the corridor. MPS 167, located at the south end of Heritage Bay Commons Tract G, serves as a wastewater booster pump station for the Heritage Bay PUD and current and future developments along Collier Blvd and east of Collier Blvd along Immokalee Road. MPS 167 currently routes wastewater to the NCWRF but will ultimately provide the flexibility to route wastewater to the future NEWRF. Constrution of the Immokalee Road/Logan Boulevard force main is underway and is planned to be complete in June 2021. None required. Page 80 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1620 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County Government Public Utilities Department 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) WASTEWATER COLLECTION/TRANSMISSION SYSTEM CONSTRAINTS 9/23/2020 Western Interconnect Background: Status: Future Actions: New Master Pump Station 101.12 (Naples Park) Background: Status: Future Action: MPS 101.00 currently serves areas north and south of 111th Avenue N. The new MPS 101.12 will allow the area to be divided such that MPS 101.00 will serve north of 111th Avenue N., and MPS 101.12 will serve the area south, which includes Naples Park. A new gravity main and force main connected to MPS 101.12 will allow greater wastewater flows to be conveyed from the constrained Naples Park area. Construct MPS 101.12 and associated piping in FY 2021-2022, at an estimated cost of $15M. A western interconnect is needed to manage growth in the south wastewater service area and to facilitate maintenance of existing force mains. A series of force main extensions and improvements to PS 309.09 are needed to move wastewater flows from the south wastewater service area to the north wastewater service area, where there is available treatment capacity. The force main along Livingston Road is divided into ten phases generally extending from Radio Road to Immokalee Road. Construct the remaining three phases in FY 2020-2022 including PS 309.09. Five phases were previously constructed ahead of development activity. Phase 2 was recently completed in August 2020. Phases 6B and 6C are planned for construction in FY 2021, and Phases 7 and 8 as well as PS 309.09 are planned for FY 2021. The final Phase 9 provides full connectivity and is planned for FY 2022. As part of the Basin 101 Program, the needed infrastructure has been designed. The project was put on hold while funds were loaned for the Hurricane Irma debris mission. Page 81 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1621 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Wastewater Collection/Transmission System Constraints Page 82 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1622 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) NORTH SOUTH 1. 24.100 16.000 2a. 16.734 18.985 2b. 12.105 9.944 3a. 3.500 (3.500) 3b. 0.000 0.000 4a. 3.866 0.515 4b. 11.995 6.056 5a.SYSTEM AVAILABILITY BASED ON MAX. 3-DAY (Line 4a / Line 1)16% 3% 5b.SYSTEM AVAILABILITY BASED ON PERMIT (MAX. MONTH) (Line 4b / Line 1)50% 38% Peak Flow Diversion (MADF) [5] Current Available Diminishing Capacity (TDADF) (Line 1 - Line 2a - Line 3a) Current Available Diminishing Capacity (MADF) (Line 1 - Line 2b - Line 3b) CURRENT AVAILABILITY WITHOUT FUTURE COMMITMENTS WASTEWATER [1] CURRENT AVAILABLE CAPACITY (BASED ON HISTORICAL EXTREME EVENT) Existing Permitted/Operational Plant Capacity per 2019 AUIR (TMADF) 10-Year Maximum TDADF [2] 10-Year Maximum MADF [3] Peak Flow Diversion (TDADF) [5] COLLIER COUNTY WATER - SEWER DISTRICT SYSTEM UTILIZATION AND DIMINISHING CAPACITY REPORT ("CHECKBOOK") REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DATA: Current as of August 17, 2020 INTRODUCTION: The Checkbook uses the historical maximum 3-day average daily flow (TDADF) and monthly average daily flow (MADF) from the last 10 years as baseline scenarios. Unbuilt future commitments are then multiplied by standard peaking factors and added to the baselines to arrive at worst-case scenarios for future operational requirements. Million Gallons per Day (MGD) 20 of 24Page 83 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1623 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COLLIER COUNTY WATER - SEWER DISTRICT SYSTEM UTILIZATION AND DIMINISHING CAPACITY REPORT ("CHECKBOOK") REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DATA: Current as of August 17, 2020 NORTH SOUTH 6. 3.012 4.264 7a. 4.095 (3.500) 7b. 0.337 0.000 8a. 0.260 (3.750) 8b. 8.646 1.792 9a.SYSTEM AVAILABILITY BASED ON MAX. 3-DAY (Line 8a / Line 1)1% -23% 9b.SYSTEM AVAILABILITY BASED ON PERMIT (MAX. MONTH) (Line 8b / Line 1)36% 11% NORTH SOUTH 10a. 0.000 0.000 10b. 0.000 0.000 11a. 0.260 (3.750) 11b. 8.646 1.792 12a.SYSTEM AVAILABILITY BASED ON MAX. 3-DAY (Line 11a / Line 1)1%-23% 12b.SYSTEM AVAILABILITY BASED ON PERMIT (MAX. MONTH) (Line 11b / Line 1)36% 11% Future Available Capacity (TDADF) (Line 8a + Line 10a + Line 10b) Future Available Capacity (MADF) (Line 8b + Line 10a + Line10b) FUTURE AVAILABILITY WITH EXPANSIONS CURRENT AVAILABILITY WITH FUTURE COMMITMENTS Million Gallons per Day (MGD) WASTEWATER [1] FUTURE AVAILABLE CAPACITY (WITH EXPANSIONS) Expansions Within Next 12 Months (MADF) Expansions Within Next 12-24 Months (MADF) PROJECTED AVAILABLE CAPACITY (WITH FUTURE COMMITMENTS) Total BCC-approved Active PUD commitments (Unbuilt per GMD PUD Master List) [4] Peak Flow Diversion (TDADF) [5] Peak Flow Diversion (MADF) [5] Projected Available Capacity (TDADF) (Line 1 - Line 2a - Line 6 - Line 7a) Projected Available Capacity (MADF) (Line 1 - Line 2b - Line 6 - Line 7b) Million Gallons per Day (MGD) WASTEWATER [1] 21 of 24Page 84 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1624 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COLLIER COUNTY WATER - SEWER DISTRICT SYSTEM UTILIZATION AND DIMINISHING CAPACITY REPORT ("CHECKBOOK") REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DATA: Current as of August 17, 2020 [1] Wastewater North and South shown separately because of the finite capacity of the interconnect. [2] Aug-17 Sep-20 [3] Feb-19 Jan-16 [4] [5] Capacity requested by outstanding active BCC-approved PUD units, as documented in the most current GMD PUD Master List. Built-out, closed- out, inactive, and discontinued PUD's are not included in line 5; only active PUD's are included. The outstanding PUD units are assumed to be developed before PUD closeout. Level of service for future commitments is defined by the latest rate study. Wastewater flows can be diverted from the south service area to the NCWRF via the East and West Interconnects and associated pump station improvements. The East Interconnect is an existing 20" force main along Santa Barbara Blvd that can divert flows from MPSs 312.00 and 313.00 to MPS 104.00, which ultimately discharges to the NCWRF. The West Interconnect is a proposed 24" force main along Livingston Road that will divert flows from MPSs 305.00, 309.00, and 310.00 ultimately to the NCWRF. The West Interconnect is being constructed in phases and will become operational in FY 2022. Peak flows can be diverted to MPS 167.00 (Heritage Bay) by the 0.75 MGD OT master pump station and force mains along Oil Well Road and Immokalee Road. MPS 167.00 will have the capability of diverting wastewater flows from the north and/or south service areas to the future NEWRF. These interconnects provide the operational flexibility needed to manage the peak flows forecasted by the FOOTNOTES/QUALIFIERS: Line 2a: Mo-Yr of Max. 3-Day Since August 2010 => Line 2b: Mo-Yr of Max. Month Since August 2010 => 22 of 24Page 85 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1625 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2020-2024 PUD WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT CIE #PROJECT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL Debt Service $11,443,500 $10,849,500 $9,053,000 $9,050,500 $8,767,000 $49,163,500 Expansion Related Projects - Other $10,225,000 $10,000,000 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $25,225,000 Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects - Other $36,300,000 $35,750,000 $28,675,000 $29,695,000 $29,785,000 $160,205,000 Departmental Capital $740,000 $755,000 $770,000 $785,000 $801,000 $3,851,000 Reserve for Contingencies - Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $3,630,000 $3,575,000 $2,868,000 $2,970,000 $2,979,000 $16,022,000 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $62,338,500 $60,929,500 $41,366,000 $47,500,500 $42,332,000 $254,466,500 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL SIF - Wastewater System Development Fees / Impact Fees $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $33,000,000 B1 - Bonds/ Loans $10,225,000 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $15,225,000 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SCA - Wastewater Capital Account - Transfers $740,000 $755,000 $770,000 $785,000 $801,000 $3,851,000 REV - Rate Revenue $44,773,500 $53,574,500 $33,996,000 $35,115,500 $34,931,000 $202,390,500 REVENUE TOTAL $62,338,500 $60,929,500 $41,366,000 $47,500,500 $42,332,000 $254,466,500 CIE consistent with Board-approved FY21 budget As per Florida Statues, reserve for contingencies is up to 10% of expenses. FY 2021 is obtained from the 2021 Proposed Budget, split 50/50 between Water and Wastewater. FY 2022 to FY 2025 are 2% increases over each fiscal year (pursuant to CPI adjustments per Board policy). Debt Service: All years are obtained from the current Collier County Water-Sewer District Financial Statements and Other Reports including Summary of Debt Service requirements to maturity. Total Debt Service amount is split 50/50 between Water and Wastewater. Reserve for Contingencies - Replacement and Rehabilitation Projects: NOTE: Collier County has adopted a two-year Concurrency Management System. Figures provided for years three, four and five of this Schedule of Capital Improvements are not part of the Concurrency Management System but must be financially feasible with a dedicated revenue source or an alternative revenue source if the dedicated revenue source is not realized. Revenue sources are estimates only; both the mix of sources and amounts will change when a rate study is conducted. DATA SOURCES: Expansion Related and Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects: FY 2021 is obtained from the 2021 Proposed Budget for R&R projects. Expansion projects require additional funding and therefore not included in the budget. FY 2022 to FY 2025 are estimated project costs. Department Capital: CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE NOTES 9/23/20205:21 PMPage 86 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1626 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY FISCAL YEARS 2025 - 2029 PUD WASTEWATER PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT CIE #PROJECT FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL Debt Service $7,990,000 $7,171,500 $6,947,500 $8,034,000 $7,310,000 $37,453,000 Expansion Related Projects - Other $1,333,000 $103,000,000 $14,667,000 $0 $0 $119,000,000 Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects - Other $32,007,000 $29,830,000 $37,163,000 $31,330,000 $31,330,000 $161,660,000 Departmental Capital $817,000 $833,000 $850,000 $867,000 $884,000 $4,251,000 Reserve for Contingencies - Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $3,201,000 $2,983,000 $3,716,000 $3,133,000 $3,133,000 $16,166,000 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $45,348,000 $143,817,500 $63,343,500 $43,364,000 $42,657,000 $338,530,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL SIF - Wastewater System Development Fees / Impact Fees $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $33,000,000 B1 - Bonds/ Loans $0 $103,000,000 $14,667,000 $0 $0 $117,667,000 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SCA - Wastewater Capital Account - Transfers $817,000 $833,000 $850,000 $867,000 $884,000 $4,251,000 REV - Rate Revenue $37,931,000 $33,384,500 $41,226,500 $35,897,000 $35,173,000 $183,612,000 REVENUE TOTAL $45,348,000 $143,817,500 $63,343,500 $43,364,000 $42,657,000 $338,530,000 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE NOTES NOTE: Figures provided for years six through ten are estimates of revenues versus project costs but do not constitute a long-term concurrency system. Revenue sources are estimates only; both the mix of sources and amounts will change when a rate study is conducted. 9/23/20205:21 PMPage 87 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1627 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES CONTENTS • SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES − 2019 SUMMARY • APPENDIX “A” - COLLIER COUNTY PEAK SEASON POPULATION ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS • APPENDIX “B” - TEN YEAR OF PERMITTED LANDFILL CAPACITY • APPENDIX “C” - TWO YEARS OF LINED CELL CAPACITY Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 88 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1628 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Solid Waste Disposal Facilities Annual Update and Inventory Report July 20, 2020 CONTENTS Solid Waste Disposal Facilities 2020 AUIR Report APPENDIX A: Municipal Service Benefit Map APPENDIX B: Schedule of Lined Landfill Capacity APPENDIX C: Collier County Landfill Permitted Disposal Capacity Page 89 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1629 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Solid Waste Disposal Facilities 2020 AUIR Report Facility Type: Solid Waste Disposal Facilities Level of Service (LOS) Standard1: Two (2) years of constructed lined cell capacity. Ten (10) years of permittable capacity. Collier County Landfill (CCLF) Capacity2: Two (2) years of constructed lined cell capacity requirement: 525,468 Tons Available lined capacity: 1,369,406 Tons Reference Appendix B for Schedule of lined landfill capacity Ten (10) years of permittable capacity requirement: 2,812,413 Tons Total Remaining permitted capacity: 13,289,577 Tons Estimated date of filled capacity of Collier County Landfill: 40 Years or 2060 Currently, only waste generated in Municipal Solid Waste Service District I (See Appendix A) is landfilled at Collier County Landfill (CCLF). For the purpose of these projections it is assumed the County will renew, amend or enter into a new agreement, as necessary, and continue to transfer waste generated in Municipal Service District II to Okeechobee Landfill. Appendix C displays calculations for landfill capacity. Contract Capacity: The Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Division maintains a Disposal Capacity Agreement with Okeechobee Landfill (June 12, 2001) for 930,000 tons of contracted disposal capacity at the Okeechobee Landfill (located in Okeechobee County). Currently waste generated in Municipal Solid Waste Service District II (See Appendix A) is diverted to this disposal site. Remaining Contracted Capacity 645,411 Tons Estimated Remaining Capacity3 21 Years or 2041 Okeechobee Landfill Life4 29 Years or 2049 ____________________________________________________________________________ 1Capital Improvement Element as of Resolution 2018-208 adopted November 13, 2018 2Assumptions for calculations: District I projected per capita disposal rate derived from historical data as applied to projected population growth (from AUIR Appendix). Reference Appendix C for calculation methodology. 3Based on historical data trends and population growth. 4Source: Report submitted to FDEP, dated March 31,2020, “Annual Estimate of Remaining Life” by CEC for Okeechobee Landfill. Page 90 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1630 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Landfill Airspace Preservation: Landfill Operating Agreement (LOA) The Collier County Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Division entered into a life of site agreement that requires the Landfill is financed and operated under a design/build/operate Landfill Operating Agreement (LOA) with Waste Management Inc. of Florida (WMIF). The LOA also includes the management of the County’s transfer station, located in Immokalee. In accordance with the LOA, all landfill operating expenses incurred, including cell construction, permitting and closure care are funded by WMIF. LOA expenses are paid from revenue generated from tipping fees. Under the LOA: • No debt is carried by Collier County • Design/build/operate provisions ensure proper cell capacity • The Contractor maintains environmental liability • Allows for 900 tons per day of waste transfer from CCLF to Okeechobee Landfill Disposal Capacity Agreement Waste collected in District II is transferred from the Immokalee transfer station to Okeechobee Landfill. This agreement allows for 930,000 tons of capacity of which approximately 645,411 tons remain. Assuming no waste is diverted from District I, the remaining capacity is estimated to last through Fiscal Year 2041. • The LOA includes a 900 tons per day (TPD) allowance for the transportation and disposal of waste from the Collier County Landfill to Okeechobee Landfill (Amendment #2; June 12, 2001). • Collier County maintains a separate Disposal Capacity Agreement with Okeechobee Landfill (June 12, 2001) for 930,000 tons of contracted disposal capacity at the Okeechobee Landfill allocated for waste transferred from the Immokalee Transfer Station (ITS). Integrated Solid Waste Management Strategy The Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Division continues to meet the current disposal needs of Collier County; and plan for the long term solid and hazardous waste needs of Collier County with initiatives from the Integrated Solid Waste Management Strategy (approved by the BCC, 2006), including, but not limited to the guiding principle to preserve airspace through use of the following components: • Source Reduction • Material Reuse and Recycling • Diversion • Optimizing Existing Assets and Resources Page 91 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1631 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Recommended Action: The Public Utilities Department's staff recommends that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners find the 2020 AUIR in compliance with concurrency requirements in FS Section 163, the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Code; and continue to support the Division’s Integrated Solid Waste Strategy initiatives to increase recycling to reach the 75% State goal, to divert recyclables and hazardous waste from the Collier County Landfill, and obtain appropriate means and methods of the various waste streams to support the needs of Collier County. Continue to research alternative methods of disposal, waste reduction, and recycling. The Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Division reached a milestone, achieving a recycling rate of 68% in 2020, as reported by FDEP. The Household Hazardous Waste Program collected approximately two (2) million pounds of household hazardous waste Fiscal Year 2019. The Recycling Drop-off Centers served over 70,000 customers of Collier County in Fiscal Year 2019. Execute LOA contract language to transfer up to 900 tons per day. Analyze waste quantity and fiscal impact for waste generated within the Districts for tonnage delivered to the Immokalee Transfer Station versus Collier County Landfill. The Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Division continue to follow and update the Board approved Integrated and Solid Waste Management Strategy to comply with the Growth Management Plan and work to derive and implement long term sustainable disposal goals. Page 92 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1632 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) APPENDIX A Municipal Services Benefit Page 93 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1633 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) APPENDIX B: SCHEDULE OF LINED LANDFILL CAPACITY COLLIER COUNTY LANDFILL (CCLF) NORTH N.T.S EASTERN PRESERVE AREA WESTERN PRESERVE AREA WET DETENTION AREA DRY RETENTION AREA COUNTY SCALEHOUSE FACILITY COUNTY HHW FACILITY WMRE FACILITY WM OFFICE FACILITY 305 AC. PROPERTY COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS RESOURCE PARK PARTIALLY FILLED Cells A6, A7, & A8 LINED AIRSPACE CURRENTLY BEING FILLED Cells 3,4, A1, A2 & A3 Filled to Elevation 100’ 9.2 ACRE CELL A5 Lined in 2020 (unlined) CELL A4 To be lined in 2024 9.4 ACRE (unlined) Future CELL A9 5.2 ACRE Cell 6 Filled to Elevation 100’ FILLED TO ELEVATION 100’: 132.7 ACRES CELLS 3, 4, 6, A1, A2, A3 CAPACITY BALANCE TO REACH ELEVATION 100’ (TONS) LINED LANDFILLING: 36.6 ACRES CELLS A6, A7, A8, A5 1,560,587 UNLINED: 14.6 ACRES CELLS A4 & A9 1,766,600 All Cells to be lined at elevation 100’ to fill to elevation 200’. This equates to approximately 13.3 million cubic yards (or 9.9 million tons). LANDFILL PROPERTY FOOTPRINT: 311 ACRES PERMITTED FOR LANDFILLING: 184 ACRES Page 94 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1634 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Appendix C: Collier County Landfill Permitted Disposal Capacity Level of Service Standard: Landfill Capacity at Projected Tons per Capita Disposal Rate 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Fiscal Year Peak Population Estimated Tons Per Capita Disposal Rate Estimated Annual Tons Disposed Collier County Landfill Permitted Capacity Balance (cy) Estimated Average Compaction Rate (tons/cy) Collier County Landfill Capacity Balance (tons) Next Ten Years Landfill Capacity Requirement (tons) Two Year Landfill Capacity Requirement (tons) Available Lined Landfill Capacity (tons) 2011 392,180 0.52 202,226 N/A N/A 8,655,571 2,302,083 412,496 N/A 2012*398,107 0.51 203,185 N/A N/A 18,566,434 2,353,717 427,249 N/A 2013 402,268 0.52 209,311 N/A N/A 18,524,000 2,403,242 442,416 N/A 2014 408,351 0.53 217,938 N/A N/A 18,186,000 2,448,271 458,126 N/A 2015 416,590 0.54 224,479 N/A N/A 17,961,521 2,490,536 481,249 N/A 2016 424,603 0.55 233,647 N/A N/A 18,408,274 2,804,790 508,018 N/A 2017 433,539 0.57 247,602 N/A N/A 18,970,672 2,864,860 502,994 N/A 2018 442,240 0.59 260,416 18,386,339 N/A 18,710,256 2,916,440 498,476 N/A 2019 405,035 0.60 242,578 18,062,901 x 0.75 =13,547,175 2,675,006 516,197 1,613,984 2020 414,569 0.62 255,897 17,719,437 x 0.75 =13,289,577 2,812,413 525,468 1,369,406 2021 421,907 0.62 260,300 17,372,370 x 0.75 =13,029,278 2,855,866 535,301 1,109,106 2022 429,378 0.62 265,168 17,018,812 x 0.75 =12,764,109 2,897,710 545,324 843,938 2023 436,986 0.62 270,132 16,658,636 x 0.75 =12,493,977 2,937,887 555,086 573,805 2024 444,731 0.62 275,192 16,291,713 x 0.75 =12,218,785 2,976,335 563,972 Cell A4 2025 451,703 0.62 279,893 15,918,522 x 0.75 =11,938,891 3,013,168 572,263 scheduled for 2026 457,875 0.62 284,078 15,539,751 x 0.75 =11,654,813 3,048,570 580,538 liner constrution 2027 464,133 0.62 288,185 15,155,504 x 0.75 =11,366,628 3,082,641 588,936 2028 470,478 0.62 292,353 14,765,700 x 0.75 =11,074,275 3,115,347 597,111 2029 476,911 0.62 296,583 14,370,256 x 0.75 =10,777,692 3,146,648 604,280 2030 482,738 0.62 300,527 13,969,553 x 0.75 =10,477,165 3,176,656 610,766 2031 487,942 0.62 303,753 13,564,549 x 0.75 =10,173,412 3,205,911 617,322 2032 493,203 0.62 307,013 13,155,198 x 0.75 =9,866,399 3,234,396 623,949 2033 498,521 0.62 310,309 12,741,453 x 0.75 =9,556,090 3,262,095 630,367 2034 503,897 0.62 313,641 12,323,266 x 0.75 =9,242,449 3,288,990 636,206 2035 508,877 0.62 316,726 11,900,964 x 0.75 =8,925,723 3,315,345 641,736 2036 513,319 0.62 319,479 11,474,991 x 0.75 =8,606,243 3,341,513 647,315 2037 517,801 0.62 322,256 11,045,316 x 0.75 =8,283,987 3,367,488 652,943 2038 522,322 0.62 325,058 10,611,905 x 0.75 =7,958,929 3,393,266 658,420 2039 526,883 0.62 327,885 10,174,725 x 0.75 =7,631,044 3,418,841 663,543 2040 531,161 0.62 330,536 9,734,011 x 0.75 =7,300,508 3,444,408 668,506 2041 535,150 0.62 333,007 9,290,001 x 0.75 =6,967,501 3,470,167 673,506 2042 539,170 0.62 335,498 8,842,670 x 0.75 =6,632,003 3,496,118 678,543 2043 543,220 0.62 338,008 8,391,993 x 0.75 =6,293,995 3,522,263 683,617 2044 547,299 0.62 340,535 7,937,946 x 0.75 =5,953,460 3,548,603 688,729 2045 551,409 0.62 343,082 7,480,504 x 0.75 =5,610,378 3,575,141 693,879 2046 555,549 0.62 345,647 7,019,641 x 0.75 =5,264,731 3,601,878 699,068 2047 559,721 0.62 348,232 6,555,332 x 0.75 =4,916,499 3,628,816 704,296 2048 563,924 0.62 350,836 6,087,550 x 0.75 =4,565,663 3,655,955 709,563 2049 568,158 0.62 353,460 5,616,271 x 0.75 =4,212,203 3,683,298 714,869 2050 572,424 0.62 356,103 5,141,467 x 0.75 =3,856,100 3,710,846 720,215 2051 576,723 0.62 358,766 4,663,112 x 0.75 =3,497,334 3,738,600 725,602 2052 581,053 0.62 361,449 4,181,180 x 0.75 =3,135,885 3,766,563 731,028 2053 585,416 0.62 364,152 3,695,643 x 0.75 =2,771,732 3,794,735 736,496 2054 589,812 0.62 366,876 3,206,475 x 0.75 =2,404,856 3,823,118 742,004 2055 594,241 0.62 369,620 2,713,649 x 0.75 =2,035,237 3,851,714 747,554 2056 598,703 0.62 372,384 2,217,136 x 0.75 =1,662,852 3,880,525 753,145 2057 603,199 0.62 375,169 1,716,911 x 0.75 =1,287,683 3,909,551 758,778 2058 607,728 0.62 377,975 1,212,943 x 0.75 =909,707 3,938,795 764,453 2059 612,291 0.62 380,803 705,206 x 0.75 =528,905 3,968,259 770,171 2060 616,889 0.62 383,651 193,672 x 0.75 =145,254 3,997,943 N/A [*] The change in permitted capacity is due to a revision of the County's landfill permit reflecting an increase in landfill height from 100 feet to 200 feet, resulting in the addition of an estimated 9.9 million tons of disposal capacity or an estimated 30 years of additional capacity. 1 Data prior to this Fiscal Year 2020 AUIR is based upon previous AUIR Reports. 2 County provided BEBR peak population for Municipal Service District I population. 3 Tons Per Capita Disposal Rate = Projected Annual Tons Disposed (column 4) divided by the Peak Population (column 2). 4 Estimated Annual Tons Disposed is the estimated tons to be landfilled based on historical disposal rates and peak population projections. 5 Total Landfill Capacity Balance (cy) for the Fiscal Year 2020 is derived from the 2020 Airspace Utilization Report performed by Carlson Environmental Consultants, PC for the approximate calendar year of 2019. The calendar year estimate is adjusted to a Fiscal Year basis by adding the estimated cubic yards utilized during the months of October 2019 through December 2019 in order to determine the beginning Fiscal Year balance (not shown). Fiscal Year values in 2020 and beyond are estimated based upon the projected annual tonnage to be disposed and the County's average compaction rate. 6 Estimated Average Compaction Rate is the projected average tons disposed per cubic yard of landfill space. The Compaction Rate of .75 tons/cy (1,500 lbs./cy) was determined by historical average. This value varies daily based upon waste composition, equipment, and weather. 7 Collier County Landfill Capacity Balance (tons) is the previous year's Total Landfill Capacity Balance (column 7) minus Annual Tons Disposed (column 4) at the Collier County Landfill. 8 Next Ten Years Landfill Capacity Requirement (tons) is the sum of the next ten years of Annual Tons Disposed (column 4) at the Collier County Landfill. 9 Two Year Landfill Capacity Requirement (tons) = the sum of the next 2 years (column 2) estimated landfilled tons. 10 Available Lined Landfill Capacity (tons) is the previous year's Total Landfill Capacity Balance (column 10) minus Annual Tons Disposed (column 4) at the Collier County Landfill and construction schedule for each Cell. Page 95 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1635 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 TOTAL LANDFILL CAPACITY (millions of tons)FISCAL YEAR 2020 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Level of Service (LOS) Standard Assessment Collier County Landfill Capacity Balance (tons)Next Ten Years Landfill Capacity Requirement (tons) FY 60 Reached Landfill Capacity FY12Vertical Expansion from 100 to 200 ft. permitted by FDEP FY19Recognition of Capacity Agreement and conservative compaction rate FY 50 LOS 10 Years of Remaining Landfill LifePage 96 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1636 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN CONTENTS • SUMMARY OF DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) FOR NEXT FIVE YEARS • COUNTYWIDE SCHOOLS INVENTORY − MAP Collier County 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 97 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1637 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) IMMOKALEE RD E LAKE TRAFFORD RD I-75 SR 29SR 29IMMOKALEE RD OIL WELL RD COLLIER BLVDCR 846 SR 82 LIVINGSTON RDSR 29 NSAN MARCO RDEVERGLADES BLVD NRADIO RDAIRPORT PULLING RD NLOGAN BLVD NDESOTO BLVD VANDERBILT DRCORKS CRE W RD GOLDEN GATE BLVD W S 1ST ST2020 COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS US 41 US 41 LEE COUNTY HENDRYCOUNTYLEGEND CATEGORY Elementary Middle High Charter Other 0 2 4 61Miles GIS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICP GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ³ §¨¦I-75 Page 98 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1638 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES CONTENTS • COUNTY COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL PARK LANDS − SUMMARY • LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD (LOSS) ASSESSMENT FOR COMMUNITY PARK LANDS • TABLE • CHART • ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN COMMUNITY PARK LAND INVENTORY OVER NEXT FIVE YEARS ‒ TABLE • LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD (LOSS) ASSESSMENT FOR REGIONAL PARK LANDS • TABLE • CHART • ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN REGIONAL PARK LAND INVENTORY OVER NEXT FIVE YEARS ‒ TABLE • COUNTY PARK LAND INVENTORY • COUNTY PARKS INVENTORY − MAP • FEDERAL AND STATE OWNED PARK LAND − MAP Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 99 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1639 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 1.2 acres per 1,000/population (Community) 2.7 acres per 1,000/population (Regional) $119,947 per acre*(Community) $504,450 per acre*(Regional) Acres Value 594.99 $71,367,266 551.45 **$66,144,773 0.22 $26,388 43.76 $5,248,881 1,559.96 $786,921,822 1,374.29 ***$693,260,591 1.75 ****$882,788 187.42 $94,544,019 Expenditures $0 $18,065,200 $12,090,900 $30,156,100 Revenues $43,936,600 $2,560,000 Grant/Reimbursement $0 $10,835,400 $0 Surtax for Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park $40,000,000 $97,332,000 $67,175,900 none That the BCC approve the proposed Community and Regional Park Lands AUIR and adopt the CIE Update for FY 2020/21- FY 2024/25. Total Expenditures Total Revenues Surplus or (Deficit) Revenues***** Revenues needed to maintain existing LOSS Impact Fees anticipated Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service Proposed added value through commitments, leases and governmental transfers Proposed AUIR FY 20/21-24/25 (value of) Acquisitions Debt Service Payments for 2019 Loan**** 5-year Surplus or (Deficit) Recommendation: 2020 AUIR SUMMARY COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL PARK LANDS Facility Type: Community and Regional Park Land (Category A) Level of Service Standards (LOSS): Interest/Misc Required Inventory as of 9/30/2025 Proposed AUIR FY 2020/21-2024/25 5-year Surplus or (Deficit) Unit Costs: Community Parks: Using the Peak Season population for unincorporated area of the County, the following is set forth: Available Inventory as of 9/30/2020 Regional Parks: Using the Countywide Peak Season population, the following is set forth: Available Inventory as of 9/30/2020 Required Inventory as of 9/30/2025 Proposed AUIR FY 2020/21-2024/25 Debt Service Payments for 2011/2013 Bonds Page 100 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1640 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) * ** *** **** ***** Land purchase .22 acres Hamilton Ave Collier Enterprises property FY21 Community Park Land and Regional Park Land Unit Cost values are based on the 2017 Impact Fee Study Update Countywide Peak Season population of 508,998 x 0.0027 LOSS = 1,374.29 acres Reserved for future growth. 2019 Loan for GG Golf Course. The loan amount is the full annual debt service amount. The debt will be allocated once all or a portion of the property is re-purposed. Land purchase 1.75 acres Collier County Sports and Events Park FY21 = 551.45 acres Peak Season population for the unincorporated area of the County of 459,543 x 0.0012 LOSS Notes: Page 101 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1641 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) FISCAL POPULATION PARK ACRES PARK ACRES PARK ACRES SURPLUS/REQUIRED TOTAL/VALUE YEAR UNINCORPORATED REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE *(DEFICIENCY)COST AT AVAILABLE 0.0012000 IN AUIR $119,947 $119,947 2019-20 418,625 502.35 0.00 594.99 92.64 $60,255,375 $71,367,266 2020-21 426,709 512.05 0.22 595.21 83.16 $61,418,861 $71,393,654 2021-22 434,950 521.94 0.00 595.21 73.27 $62,605,137 $71,393,654 2022-23 443,351 532.02 0.00 595.21 63.19 $63,814,203 $71,393,654 2023-24 451,914 542.30 0.00 595.21 52.91 $65,047,258 $71,393,654 2024-25 459,543 551.45 0.00 595.21 43.76 $66,144,773 $71,393,654 1st 5-Year Growth (2021-2025)40,918 49.10 0.22 2025-26 466,207 559.45 0.00 595.21 35.76 $67,104,349 $71,393,654 2026-27 472,970 567.56 0.00 595.21 27.65 $68,077,119 $71,393,654 2027-28 479,837 575.80 0.00 595.21 19.41 $69,065,483 $71,393,654 2028-29 486,807 584.17 0.00 595.21 11.04 $70,069,439 $71,393,654 2029-30 493,031 591.64 0.00 595.21 3.57 $70,965,443 $71,393,654 2nd 5-Year Growth (2026-2030)33,488 40.19 0.00 Total 10-Year Growth (2021-2030)74,406 89.29 0.22 Note: 2020 AUIR Community Park Acres LOSS: 1.2 Acres/1000 Population Hamilton Ave Collier Enterprises Property land purchase .22 acresPage 102 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1642 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 18065200 12090900 490.28 500.25 509.6 519.12 528.84 538.73 547.77 555.91 564.18 572.58 581.11 594.99 595.21 595.21 595.21 595.21 595.21 595.21 595.21 595.21 595.21 595.21 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Community Park Acreage Acres Required Acres AvailablePage 103 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1643 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) FY Action Acquisition Type Location Acres Value Cash Expenditure $119,947 2020/21 Add Land purchase Hamilton Ave Collier Ent 0.22 $26,388 0.22 $26,388 $0 2021/22 $0 0 $0 $0 2022/23 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 2023/24 $0 0 $0 $0 2024/25 $0 0 $0 $0 0.22 $26,388 $0 2025/26 $0 0 $0 $0 2026/27 $0 0 $0 $0 2027/28 $0 0 $0 $0 2028/29 $0 0 $0 $0 2029/30 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0.22 $26,388 $0 FY 29/30 TOTAL FY 25/26 TO FY 29/30 FIVE-YEAR SUBTOTAL FY 20/21 TO FY 29/30 TEN-YEAR TOTAL FY 28/29 TOTAL Anticipated Changes in Community Park Land Inventory FY 20/21 to FY 29/30 FY 20/21 TOTAL FY 21/22 TOTAL FY 22/23 TOTAL FY 23/24 TOTAL FY 24/25 TOTAL FY 20/21 TO FY 24/25 FIVE-YEAR SUBTOTAL FY 25/26 TOTAL FY 26/27 TOTAL FY 27/28 TOTALPage 104 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1644 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) POPULATION FACILITIES FACILITIES PARK ACRES PARK ACRES REQUIRED TOTAL/VALUE FISCAL CO-WIDE REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE*SURPLUS/COST AT AVAILABLE YEAR 0.0027000 IN AUIR (DEFICIENCY)$504,450 $504,450 2019-20 465,754 1,257.54 0.00 1,559.96 302.42 $634,366,053 $786,921,822 2020-21 474,299 1,280.61 1.75 1,561.71 281.10 $646,003,715 $787,804,610 2021-22 483,001 1,304.10 0.00 1,561.71 257.61 $657,853,245 $787,804,610 2022-23 491,863 1,328.03 0.00 1,561.71 233.68 $669,924,734 $787,804,610 2023-24 500,887 1,352.39 0.00 1,561.71 209.32 $682,213,136 $787,804,610 2024-25 508,998 1,374.29 0.00 1,561.71 187.42 $693,260,591 $787,804,610 1st 5-Year Growth (2021-2025)43,244 116.76 1.75 2025-26 516,165 1,393.65 0.00 1,561.71 168.06 $703,026,743 $787,804,610 2026-27 523,433 1,413.27 0.00 1,561.71 148.44 $712,924,052 $787,804,610 2027-28 530,803 1,433.17 0.00 1,561.71 128.54 $722,962,607 $787,804,610 2028-29 538,277 1,453.35 0.00 1,561.71 108.36 $733,142,408 $787,804,610 2029-30 545,033 1,471.59 0.00 1,561.71 90.12 $742,343,576 $787,804,610 2nd 5-Year Growth (2026-2030)36,035 97.29 0.00 Total 10-Year Growth (2021-2030)79,279 214.05 1.75 Note: 2020 AUIR Regional Park Land Acres LOSS: 2.7 Acres / 1000 Population Paradise Coast Sport Park land purchase 1.75 acresPage 105 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1645 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 18065200 12090900 1227.63 1251.4 1273.85 1296.71 1319.98 1343.67 1365.41 1385.13 1405.13 1425.42 1446.01 1,559.96 1,561.71 1,561.71 1,561.71 1,561.71 1,561.71 1,561.71 1,561.71 1,561.71 1,561.71 1,561.71 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Regional Park Acreage Acres Required Acres AvailablePage 106 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1646 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) FY Action Acquisition Type Location Acres Value Cash Expenditure $504,450 2020/21 Add Land purchase Paradise Coast Sports 1.75 1.75 $882,788 $0 2021/22 $0 0.00 $0 $0 2022/23 $0 0.00 $0 $0 2023/24 $0 0.00 $0 $0 2024/25 $0 0.00 $0 $0 1.75 $0 $0 2025/26 ` 0 $0 $0 2026/27 $0 0 $0 $0 2027/28 $0 0 $0 $0 2028/29 $0 0 $0 $0 2029/30 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 1.75 $0 $0 FY 29/30 TOTAL FY 25/26 TO FY 29/30 FIVE-YEAR SUBTOTAL FY 20/21 TO FY 29/30 TEN-YEAR TOTAL FY 28/29 TOTAL Anticipated Changes in Regional Park Land Inventory FY 20/21 to FY 29/30 FY 20/21 TOTAL FY 21/22 TOTAL FY 22/23 TOTAL FY 23/24 TOTAL FY 24/25 TOTAL FY 20/21 TO FY 24/25 FIVE-YEAR SUBTOTAL FY 25/26 TOTAL FY 26/27 TOTAL FY 27/28 TOTALPage 107 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1647 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Summary of Changes in Parks and Recreation Inventory FY 19 to FY 20 Action Location Acres Explanation Add Immokalee South Park 0.25 South Park Property Interest 0.25 Action Location Acres Explanation Add Paradise Coast Sports Complex 0.35 Updated land acreage 0.35 Community Park Land Changes NET CHANGE TO COMMUNITY PARK ACREAGE Regional Park Land Changes NET CHANGE TO REGIONAL PARK ACREAGEPage 108 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1648 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Commissioner District District Location Type Acreage Community Park Acres Neighborhood Park Acres Regional Park Acres Regional Park Pathway Acres Concervation Preserve Acres 1 Marco 951 Boat Ramp Regional 0.50 0.50 1 Marco Caxambas Park Regional 4.20 4.20 1 East Naples Cindy Mysels CP Community 5.00 5.00 1 South Naples Eagle Lakes CP Community 32.00 32.00 1 Marco Goodland Boating Park Regional 5.00 5.00 1 Marco Isle of Capri Land Parcel Neighborhood 0.11 0.11 1 Marco Isles of Capri NP Neighborhood 0.35 0.35 1 Marco Isles of Capri Paddlecraft Park Regional 9.00 9.00 1 South Naples Manatee CP Community 60.00 60.00 1 Marco Mar Good Harbor Park Regional 2.50 2.50 1 East Naples Naples Manor NP Neighborhood 0.30 0.30 1 South Naples Panther NP Neighborhood 0.50 0.50 1 South Naples Port of The Islands Regional 5.55 5.55 1 Urban Estates Rich King Greenway - (FPL)Regional 37.50 37.50 1 Central Naples Rock Harbor Parcels Neighborhood 0.10 0.10 1 Marco South Marco Beach Access Regional 5.00 5.00 1 Marco Tigertail Beach Park Regional 31.60 31.60 2 North Naples Barefoot Beach Access Regional 5.00 5.00 2 North Naples Barefoot Beach Preserve Regional 159.60 159.60 2 North Naples Barefoot Beach State Land Regional 186.00 186.00 2 North Naples Clam Pass Park Regional 35.00 35.00 2 North Naples Cocohatchee River Park Regional 7.56 7.56 2 North Naples Conner Park Regional 5.00 5.00 2 North Naples Naples Park Elementary Community 5.00 5.00 2 North Naples North Collier RP Regional 207.70 207.70 2 North Naples North Naples NP (Best Friends--surplus)Neighborhood 0.36 0.36 2 North Naples Osceola Elementary Community 3.20 3.20 2 North Naples Palm River NP Neighborhood 3.00 3.00 2 North Naples Pelican Bay CP Community 15.00 15.00 2 North Naples Vanderbilt Beach Regional 5.00 5.00 2 North Naples Vanderbilt Beach Access (7 locations)Regional 0.45 0.45 2 North Naples Veterans CP Community 43.64 43.64 2 North Naples Veterans Memorial Elementary Community 4.00 4.00 2 North Naples Willoughby Park Neighborhood 1.20 1.20 3 Golden Gate Aaron Lutz NP Neighborhood 3.20 3.20 3 Golden Gate Paradise Coast Sports Park Regional 194.23 194.23 3 Golden Gate Golden Gate Community Center Community 21.00 21.00 3 Golden Gate Golden Gate CP Community 35.00 35.00 3 Golden Gate Golden Gate Golf Course Regional 167.00 167.00 3 Golden Gate Golden Gate Greenway / Pathway Community 3.00 3.00 3 North Naples Oakes NP Neighborhood 2.00 2.00 3 Golden Gate Palm Springs NP Neighborhood 6.70 6.70 3 Golden Gate Rita Eaton NP Neighborhood 4.80 4.80 3 North Naples Vineyards CP Community 35.50 35.50 4 East Naples Bay Street Land Parcels Regional 1.34 1.34 4 East Naples Bayview Park Regional 6.27 6.27 4 Golden Gate Coconut Circle NP Neighborhood 1.20 1.20 4 East Naples East Naples CP Community 47.00 47.00 4 Central Naples Fred W. Coyle Freedom Park Regional 25.16 25.16 4 Central Naples Gordon River Greenway Park Regional 79.00 79.00 4 Central Naples Naples Zoo Regional 50.00 50.00 4 North Naples North Gulfshore Beach Access Regional 0.50 0.50 2020 Collier County Park Land Inventory Page 109 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1649 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Commissioner District District Location Type Acreage Community Park Acres Neighborhood Park Acres Regional Park Acres Regional Park Pathway Acres Concervation Preserve Acres 2020 Collier County Park Land Inventory 4 North Naples Poinciana NP Neighborhood 0.30 0.30 4 East Naples Sugden RP Regional 120.00 120.00 5 Immokalee Airport Park Community 19.00 19.00 5 Immokalee Ann Oleski Park Regional 2.30 2.30 5 Urban Estates Big Corkscrew Island RP Regional 62.00 62.00 5 Urban Estates Big Corkscrew Island RP - Lake Regional 90.00 90.00 5 Urban Estates Corkscrew Elementary/Middle Community 16.90 16.90 5 Immokalee Dreamland NP - *School fenced in area Neighborhood 0.50 0.50 5 Immokalee Eden Park Elementary Community 2.80 2.80 5 Immokalee Immokalee CP Community 23.00 23.00 5 Immokalee Immokalee High School Community 1.00 1.00 5 Immokalee Immokalee South Park Community 3.45 3.45 5 Immokalee Immokalee Sports Complex Community 14.00 14.00 5 Urban Estates Livingston Woods NP (surplus)Neighborhood 2.73 2.73 5 Urban Estates Max A Hasse CP Community 20.00 20.00 5 Immokalee Oil Well Park Neighborhood 5.50 5.50 5 Urban Estates Palmetto Elementary Community 2.00 2.00 5 Immokalee Pepper Ranch Regional 50.00 50.00 5 Urban Estates Randall Curve Community 47.00 47.00 5 Urban Estates Sabal Palm Elementary Community 9.50 9.50 5 Immokalee Tony Rosbough CP Community 7.00 7.00 5 Urban Estates Vanderbilt Extension CP Community 120.00 120.00 1 Marco McIlvane Marsh Preserve 380.89 380.89 1 Marco Otter Mound Preserve Preserve 2.45 2.45 1 East Naples Shell Island Preserve Preserve 83.18 83.18 2 North Naples Cochatchee Creek Preserve Preserve 3.64 3.64 2 North Naples Railhead Scrub Preserve Preserve 135.36 135.36 2 North Naples Wet Woods Preserve Preserve 26.77 26.77 3 North Naples Alligator Flag Preserve Preserve 18.46 18.46 3 North Naples Logan Woods Preserve Preserve 6.78 6.78 4 Central Naples Fred W. Coyle Freedom Park Preserve 12.50 12.50 4 Central Naples Gordon River Greenway Preserve 50.51 50.51 5 Urban Estates Camp Keais Strand Preserve 32.50 32.50 5 Immokalee Caracara Prairie Preserve Preserve 367.70 367.70 5 Urban Estates Dr Robert H. Gore III Preserve 171.21 171.21 5 Urban Estates Nancy Payton Preserve Preserve 71.00 71.00 5 Immokalee Panther Walk Preserve Preserve 10.69 10.69 5 Immokalee Pepper Ranch Preserve Preserve 2,511.90 2,511.90 5 Urban Estates Red Maple Swamp Preserve Preserve 213.88 213.88 5 Urban Estates Redroot Preserve Preserve 9.26 9.26 5 Urban Estates Rivers Road Preserve Preserve 76.74 76.74 5 Urban Estates Winchester Head Preserve Preserve 87.41 87.41 Total Collier Units 6,460.63 594.99 32.85 1,522.46 37.50 4,272.83 Regional Parks and Pathways Totals Community Park Acres Neighborhood Park Acres Regional Park Acres Concervation Preserve Acres Value per Unit $119,947 $504,450 Total Value $71,367,266 $786,921,822 1,559.96Page 110 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1650 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Commissioner District District Location Type Acreage Community Park Acres Neighborhood Park Acres Regional Park Acres Regional Park Pathway Acres Concervation Preserve Acres 2020 Collier County Park Land Inventory District Location Type Acreage Community Park Acres Neighborhood Park Acres Regional Park Acres Regional Park Pathway Acres City of Naples Beach Accesses Regional 0.50 0.50 City of Naples Naples Landings Regional 3.81 3.81 City of Naples Fleischmann Park Community 25.26 25.26 City of Naples Cambier Park Community 12.84 12.84 City of Naples Baker Park Regional 15.20 15.20 City of Naples Lowdermilk Park Regional 10.30 10.30 City of Naples River Park CC Community 1.61 1.61 City of Naples Naples Preserve Regional 9.78 9.78 City of Naples Anthony Park Neighborhood 7.00 7.00 Total Naples Units 86.30 39.71 7.00 39.59 0.00 City of Marco Island Jane Hittler Neighborhood 0.25 0.25 City of Marco Island Veterans' Memorial Neighborhood 0.25 0.25 City of Marco Island Leigh Plummer Neighborhood 3.50 3.50 City of Marco Island Racquet Center Community 2.97 2.97 City of Marco Island Frank Mackle Community 30.00 30.00 City of Marco Island Winterberry Neighborhood 5.00 5.00 Total Marco Units 41.97 32.97 9.00 0.00 0.00 Everglades City Community Park Community 0.86 0.86 Everglades City McLeod Park Community 1.04 1.04 Total Everglades Units 1.90 1.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Municipality Units 17 130.17 74.58 16.00 39.59 0.00 Notes: Municipalities Acreage *Not included in the inventory are those community and regional parks associated with the City of Naples and City of Marco Island. Within the City of Marco Island, the County operates three regional parks, which are included within the Counties regional park acreage inventory. *Park land and amenities located in Private communities are taken into consideration when planning new parks and facilities but cannot be counted as inventory due to lack of public accessPage 111 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1651 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(CR 833 CR 846 IMMOKALEE RD TA M I A M I T R A I L OIL WELL RD LOOP RD.CR 858CR 869 CORKSCREW RD SR 951CR 951EVERGLADES BLVDE S T E R O B L V DSUMMERLIN RDGOLDEN GATE BLVD DAVIS BLVD CR 29ALICO RD RADIO RD PINE RIDGE RD DANIALS PKWY VANDERBILT BEACH BONITA BEACH RD SR 29US 41 TAMIAMI TRAILAIRPORT RDRATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RDGOODLETTE RDTAMIAMI TRAILLIVINGSTON RDSR 82 IMMOKALEE RD LAKE TRAFFORD 2 0 2 0 P A R K S I N V E N T O R Y 2 0 2 0 P A R K S I N V E N T O R Y NAPLES MARCO ISLAND IMMOKALEE EVERGLADES CITYGULFOFMEXICO§¨¦75 §¨¦75 §¨¦75 !(29 !(951 !(951 !(92 !(29!(82 !(82 . 0 3 6 9 121.5 Miles GIS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICP GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LEE COUNTY 9 F l o r i d a G u l f F l o r i d a G u l fC o a s t U n i v e r s i t y C o a s t U n i v e r s i t y A v e M a r i a T o w n A v e M a r i a T o w n a n d U n i v e r s i t y a n d U n i v e r s i t y 1 2 3 4 5 6 11 10 12 7 8 9 13 1415 16 17 20 1918 28 2122 23 24 2625 27 29 30 31 32 35 34 37 38 39 33 4636 45 40 4142 44 50 47 48 51 49 52 $+41 $+41 Map ID Number 55 43 53 55 56 54 57 58 59 60 61 Legend !(Neighborhood Parks !(Regional Parks !(Community Parks !(Undeveloped Parks !(School Site * (Interlocal agreements for recreation use) 62 HENDRY COUNTY NUMBER NAME 1 WILLOUGHBY ACRES NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 2 POINCIANA VILLAGE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 3 RITA EATON NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 4 AARON LUTZ NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 5 PALM SPRINGS NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 6 COCONUT CIRCLE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 7 DREAMLAND NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 8 IMMOKALEE SOUTH PARK 9 OILWELL PARK 10 ISLES OF CAPRI NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 11 NAPLES MANOR NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 12 PANTHER NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 13 BAREFOOT BEACH ACCESS 14 BAREFOOT BEACH PRESERVE COUNTY PARK 15 COCOHATCHEE RIVER PARK 16 CONNER PARK 17 VANDERBILT BEACH PARK 18 NORTH GULF SHORE ACCESS 19 CLAM PASS PARK 20 NORTH COLLIER REGIONAL PARK 21 SUGDEN REGIONAL PARK 22 BAYVIEW PARK 23 COLLIER BLVD BOATING PARK 24 TIGERTAIL BEACH PARK 25 SOUTH MARCO BEACH ACCESS 26 CAXAMBAS PARK 27 ANN OLESKY PARK 28 NAPLES ZOO 29 NAPLES PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL * 30 VETERANS COMMUNITY PARK NUMBER NAME 31 PELICAN BAY COMMUNITY PARK 32 VINEYARDS COMMUNTIY PARK 33 MAX A HASSE JR COMMUNITY PARK 34 GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER 35 GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY PARK 36 CORKSCREW ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOL * 37 EAST NAPLES COMMUNITY PARK 38 CINDY MYSELS COMMUNITY PARK 39 EAGLE LAKES COMMUNITY PARK 40 TONY ROSBOUGH COMMUNTY PARK 41 IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY PARK 42 IMMOKALEE SPORTS COMPLEX 43 OSCEOLA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL * 44 IMMOKALEE AIRPORT PARK 45 SABAL PALM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL * 46 BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND REGIONAL PARK 47 GOODLAND BOATING PARK 48 MARGOOD HARBOR PARK 49 GOLDEN GATE GREENWAY 50 MANATEE COMMUNITY PARK 51 GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK 52 VANDERBILT EXT COMMUNITY PARK 53 VETERANS MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL * 54 IMMOKALEE HIGH SCHOOL * 55 PALMETTO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL * 56 EDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL * 57 FRED W. COYLE FREEDOM PARK 58 PORT OF THE ISLANDS PARK 59 OAKES NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 60 RICH KING GREENWAY REGIONAL PARK 61 ISLES OF CAPRI PADDLECRAFT PARK 62 PALM RIVER NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 63 PARADISE COAST SPORTS COMPLEX PARK 63Page 112 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1652 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) §¨¦75 §¨¦75 §¨¦75 §¨¦75SR 29INTERSTATE 75 IMMOKALEE RD OIL WE LL RD COLLIER BLVDTAMIAMI TRL E CR 846 SR 82 LIVINGSTON RDTAMIAMI TRL NSR 29 NSAN MARCO RDDAVIS BLVDGOODLETTE RD NPINE RIDGE RD EVERGLADES BLVD NRADIO RDAIRPORT PULLING RD NDESOTO BLVD SLOGAN BLVD NSANTA BARBARA BLVDDESOTO BLVD NVANDERBILT BEACH RD GOLDEN GATE BLV D E 9TH ST NVANDERBILT DREVERGLADES BLVD SC O R K S C R E W R D GOLDEN GATE BLVD W C OPELAND AVE SWILSON BLVD NS 1ST STBAL D EAGL E DRN B A R FIEL D D R N 15TH STOLD US 41N COLLIER BLVDS BARFIELD DRS COLLIER BLVDBONITA BEACH RD COLLIER AVE111TH AVE N AIRPORT PULLING RD SN E W M A R K E T R D W º FEDERAL AND STATE OWNED PARK LAND 0 4.5 92.25 Miles GIS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICP GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Big CypressNational Preserve Florida PantherNational Wildlife Preserve Fakahatchee StrandPreserve StateParkPicayune StrandState Forest Ten ThousandIslands NationalWildlife R efuge Everglades National Park Rookery BayNational EstuarineResearch Reserve CollierSeminoleState Park Delnor-WigginsPass State Park Corkscrew RegionalEcosystem Watershed Okaloacoochee SloughState ForestLake TraffordImpoundment Corkscrew RegionalEcosystem Watershed Lake Trafford Name: Big C ypress N ational Preserve Collier-Seminole State Park Corkscrew R egional Ecosystem Watershed Delnor-W iggins Pass State Park Everglades National Park Fakahatchee Strand Preserve S tate Park Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge Lake Trafford Impoundment Okaloacocochee Slough State Forest Picayune Strand State Forest Rookery Bay National Reserve Ten Thousand Islands National Wildlife Refuge Acres: 574,848 7,271 15,421 166 26,840 75,000 26,400 634 4,920 78,909 110,000 35,000 TOTAL :955,4 09 (Disclaimer: The information provided is to be used for general mapping purposes only. Ground surveying and records search must be used for absolute boundaries/acreages)Page 113 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1653 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE) AMENDMENT SUBMITTALS FOR CATEGORY “A” FACILITIES CONTENTS • EXHIBIT “A”, SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR NEXT 5 FISCAL YEARS • APPENDIX “H”, SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR FUTURE FISCAL YEARS 6 ‒ 10 Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 114 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1654 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Updates and Amendments to the Capital Improvement Element The Annual Update and Inventory Report includes updates to the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan needed to eliminate existing deficiencies, replace obsolete or worn out facilities, and make available adequate facilities for future growth. These updates include the two following tables and two Collier County Public School District planning documents as provided for in Policy 4.2 of the Capital Improvement Element. What follows as “Exhibit A” is the Schedule of Capital Improvements for the next five year period [Fiscal years 2021 through 2025]. Exhibit A is a component of the Capital Improvement Element and indicates the County’s needs for arterial and collector roads and bridge facilities, parks and recreation facilities, stormwater management system, potable water system, solid waste disposal facilities, and wastewater collection and treatment system improvements – all Category “A” facilities subject to concurrency. Public schools are also Category “A” facilities, and planning for public schools over the next five year period is provided by the financially feasible five-year project programming in the Collier County Public School District Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2019 through 2038 that is incorporated by reference in the Capital Improvement Element. School planning for this period is also provided by the Collier County Public School District Facilities Work Program, as incorporated into the Capital Improvement Element as data and analysis. What follows as “Appendix H” is the Schedule of Capital Improvements for the future five year period [Fiscal years 2026 through 2030]. Appendix H supplements the Capital Improvement Element for long term facilities planning of the same Category “A” facilities. Long term planning for public schools is provided by the Collier County Public School District Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2019 through 2038. Each Schedule of Capital Improvements table represents the revenue sources and expenditures for Category “A” public facilities to maintain the levels of service standards established by the Capital Improvement Element. These updated tables, together with updated references to School District documents and their incorporation into the Capital Improvement Element as data and analysis, constitute the amendments to the Capital Improvement Element. Page 115 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1655 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Schedule of Capital Improvements Tables: 2020 Amendments EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL Big Corkscrew Park Equipmnt $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Big Corkscrew Park $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fund 346 Debt Service (2011 Bond)$2,824,529 $2,818,329 $2,820,429 $2,828,829 $2,857,929 $14,150,045 Fund 346 Debt Service (2013 Bond)$123,471 $123,471 $123,471 $123,471 $3,421,271 $3,915,155Fund 346 Debt Service (2019 Loan)$765,100 $768,900 $2,919,000 $2,933,300 $4,704,600 $12,090,900 PARKS & RECREATION FACILITIES PROJECT TOTALS $3,713,100 $3,710,700 $5,862,900 $5,885,600 $10,983,800 $30,156,100 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL IF - Impact Fees / COA Revenue $10,575,000 $8,630,200 $8,788,300 $8,949,200 $9,093,900 $43,936,600 DIF - Deferred Impact Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 IN - Interest / Misc.$512,000 $512,000 $512,000 $512,000 $512,000 $2,560,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CF - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $10,835,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,835,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GF - General Fund 001 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE TOTAL $21,922,400 $9,142,200 $9,300,300 $9,461,200 $9,605,900 $57,332,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law) TR - Added Value through Commitments, Leases & Transfers SCHEDULE NOTES PARKS & RECREATION FACILITIES PROJECTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NOTE: All Community Park Land and Regional Park Land transactions are being facilitated through interdepartmental transfers exchanging land holdings for park lands, or using other methods not involving expenditure of capital funds. These transactions represent changes to the value of land holdings only. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capial Improvements\02 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNLPage 116 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1656 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Schedule of Capital Improvements Tables: 2020 Amendments EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT SCHEDULE NOTES FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL 60144 Oil Well Rd - Everglades Blvd to Oil Well Grade Advanced Construction $2,000,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $3,200,000 60168 Vanderbilt Beach Rd - Collier Blvd to 16th St R/M/D/A 21, R 22, C 23 $600,000 $94,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $95,300,000 60229 Wilson Blvd - Golden Gate Blvd to Immokalee Rd A 21, D/R 22, C 24 $7,100,000 $0 $0 $20,500,000 $0 $27,600,000 60129 Wilson / Benfield Extension - Lord's Way to City Gate N S/C 21, R/A 22-25 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $9,000,000 60215 Triangle Blvd / Price St R 21, R/C 22 $6,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,800,000 60190 Airport Rd - Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Immokalee Rd D/R 21, C/M 22, 23 $3,100,000 $14,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $17,900,000 66066 11 Bridge Replacements D/C/M 21, 22 $33,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,100,000 60201 Pine Ridge Rd - Livingston Blvd to I-75 R 21, D 22, D/C/M 23 $1,500,000 $0 $42,500,000 $0 $0 $44,000,000 60212 New Golden Gate Bridges (10)D/C 22 - 25 $0 $15,500,000 $6,100,000 $27,000,000 $8,600,000 $57,200,000 33524 Tiger Grant C 21 $13,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,000,000 70167 Business Center (City Gate)A 21, C 23 $10,500,000 $5,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $16,000,000 68056 Collier Blvd (Green to GG Main Canal)R/D/C 23 $0 $0 $38,200,000 $0 $0 $38,200,000 60065 Randall Blvd - Immokalee Rd to Oil Well R 22, D 24 $250,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $3,250,000 60241 16th Street NE Bridge D/C/M 21 $11,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,800,000 TBD Goodlette Rd (Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Immokalee Rd)D 23, A 24, 25 $0 $0 $2,309,000 $634,000 $9,366,000 $12,309,000 TBD Green Blvd (Santa Barbara Blvd to Sunshine)S 23 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000 TBD Vanderbilt Beach Rd - 16th to Everglades Blvd D/R/M 22, R/A 23, 24 $0 $2,800,000 $11,250,000 $5,000,000 $0 $19,050,000 60228 Sidewalks D 21, D/C 22, 23, C 24, 25 $1,416,000 $2,281,000 $1,251,000 $4,895,000 $0 $9,843,000 TBD Immokalee Rd - Livingston to Logan S/A 24 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 60073 Davis Mystic DCA Reimb $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 60144 Oil Well Rd (Everglades to Oil Well Grade)A 21-25 $2,000,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $3,200,000 TBD Poinciana Professional Park C 23 $0 $0 $300,000 $1,600,000 $0 $300,000 60198a Veterans Memorial PH I & PH 2 R 21, D/A/C 22, R/D 23, C/M 24 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 60198b Veterans Memorial PH II HS to US 41 R 21, D/A/C 22, R/D 23, C/M 24 $1,000,000 $2,700,000 $13,400,000 $0 $0 $17,100,000 60199 Vanderbilt Beach Rd - US 41 to E of Goodlette D 21, D/C 25 $0 $0 $0 $13,500,000 $13,500,000 60147 Randall/Immokalee Road Intersection D/R 21, C/M 23 $2,500,000 $0 $12,600,000 $0 $0 $15,100,000 60219 Whippoorwill C 21-22 $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 60229 Wilson Blvd - GG Blvd to Immokalee Rd A 21, D/R 212, 23, C 24 $7,100,000 $0 $0 $20,500,000 $0 $27,600,000 TBD Santa Barbara/Logan turnlanes D 24, C 25 $0 $0 $0 $879,000 $7,879,000 $8,758,000 Sbttl Several Shoulder Widenings/Intersection Improvements $2,242,000 $3,000,000 $1,600,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,842,000 Sbttl Operations Improvements/Programs $15,804,000 $0 $17,625,000 $17,625,000 $12,925,000 $63,979,000 60085 TIS Reviews $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,250,000 60109 Planning Consulting $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,500,000 60163 Traffic Studies $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,500,000 Impact Fee Refunds $0 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,000,000 Debt Service Payments $13,317,000 $13,131,000 $13,136,000 $13,576,000 $0 $53,160,000 $153,379,000 $157,312,000 $163,671,000 $121,109,000 $57,170,000 $642,484,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL IF - Impact Fees / COA Revenue $15,460,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $77,460,000 Unfunded Needs $26,002,000 $0 $51,519,000 $11,466,000 $0 $88,987,000 GA - Gas Tax Revenue $23,052,000 $23,500,000 $23,750,000 $24,000,000 $24,250,000 $118,552,000 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $19,434,000 $4,928,000 $9,800,000 $0 $6,806,000 $40,968,000 CF - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $534,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $534,000 GF - General Fund 001 $9,067,000 $9,389,000 $9,389,000 $9,389,000 $9,389,000 $46,623,000 Sales Tax $22,782,000 $95,781,000 $35,851,000 $36,429,000 $0 $190,843,000 IN - Interest Revenue - Fund 313 Gas Tax & Impact Fees $2,245,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $5,245,000 CF - Carry Forward - 313-310 Impact Fees $59,834,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $59,834,000 REIM - Expected FEMA Reimbursement $0 $8,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,500,000 TR - MSTU General Fund 111 Transfers $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $15,000,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)($1,962,000)($2,025,000)($2,025,000)($2,025,000)($2,025,000)($10,062,000) REVENUE TOTAL $179,448,000 $159,573,000 $147,784,000 $98,759,000 $56,920,000 $642,484,000 CUMMULATIVE FOR FY22 CAPITAL FUNDING $27,801,000 $15,637,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR ROADS AND BRIDGE PROJECTS ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR ROADS AND BRIDGE PROJECT TOTALS I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capial Improvements\02 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNLPage 117 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1657 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Schedule of Capital Improvements Tables: 2020 Amendments EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL Countywide Programs, Planning & Maintenance $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $2,000,000 Infrastructure & Capacity Projects $23,305,000 $32,800,000 $37,100,000 $31,850,000 $21,650,000 $146,705,000 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $23,705,000 $33,200,000 $37,500,000 $32,250,000 $22,050,000 $148,705,000 Stormwater Management Operating $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Debt Service / Reserves $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS $23,705,000 $33,200,000 $37,500,000 $32,250,000 $22,050,000 $148,705,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GF - New Budget from Fund (310)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 325 Reserves $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Unmet Funding Needs $12,702,000 $25,159,000 $29,459,000 $24,209,000 $14,009,000 $105,538,000 CF - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $2,919,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,919,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)($5,000)($3,000)($3,000)($3,000)($3,000)($17,000) IN - Interest Revenue - misc.$95,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $295,000 GF - New Budget from Fund (101)$4,869,000 $4,869,000 $4,869,000 $4,869,000 $4,869,000 $24,345,000 GF - New Budget from Fund (111)$3,125,000 $3,125,000 $3,125,000 $3,125,000 $3,125,000 $15,625,000 REVENUE TOTAL $23,705,000 $33,200,000 $37,500,000 $32,250,000 $22,050,000 $148,705,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE NOTES I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capial Improvements\02 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNLPage 118 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1658 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Schedule of Capital Improvements Tables: 2020 Amendments EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT SCHEDULE NOTES FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL 60144 Oil Well Rd - Everglades Blvd to Oil Well Grade Advanced Construction $2,000,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $3,200,000 60168 Vanderbilt Beach Rd - Collier Blvd to 16th St R/M/D/A 21, R 22, C 23 $600,000 $94,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $95,300,000 60229 Wilson Blvd - Golden Gate Blvd to Immokalee Rd A 21, D/R 22, C 24 $7,100,000 $0 $0 $20,500,000 $0 $27,600,000 60129 Wilson / Benfield Extension - Lord's Way to City Gate N S/C 21, R/A 22-25 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $9,000,000 60215 Triangle Blvd / Price St R 21, R/C 22 $6,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,800,000 60190 Airport Rd - Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Immokalee Rd D/R 21, C/M 22, 23 $3,100,000 $14,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $17,900,000 66066 11 Bridge Replacements D/C/M 21, 22 $33,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,100,000 60201 Pine Ridge Rd - Livingston Blvd to I-75 R 21, D 22, D/C/M 23 $1,500,000 $0 $42,500,000 $0 $0 $44,000,000 60212 New Golden Gate Bridges (10)D/C 22 - 25 $0 $15,500,000 $6,100,000 $27,000,000 $8,600,000 $57,200,000 33524 Tiger Grant C 21 $13,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,000,000 70167 Business Center (City Gate)A 21, C 23 $10,500,000 $5,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $16,000,000 68056 Collier Blvd (Green to GG Main Canal)R/D/C 23 $0 $0 $38,200,000 $0 $0 $38,200,000 60065 Randall Blvd - Immokalee Rd to Oil Well R 22, D 24 $250,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $3,250,000 60241 16th Street NE Bridge D/C/M 21 $11,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,800,000 TBD Goodlette Rd (Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Immokalee Rd)D 23, A 24, 25 $0 $0 $2,309,000 $634,000 $9,366,000 $12,309,000 TBD Green Blvd (Santa Barbara Blvd to Sunshine)S 23 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000 TBD Vanderbilt Beach Rd - 16th to Everglades Blvd D/R/M 22, R/A 23, 24 $0 $2,800,000 $11,250,000 $5,000,000 $0 $19,050,000 60228 Sidewalks D 21, D/C 22, 23, C 24, 25 $1,416,000 $2,281,000 $1,251,000 $4,895,000 $0 $9,843,000 TBD Immokalee Rd - Livingston to Logan S/A 24 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 60073 Davis Mystic DCA Reimb $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 60144 Oil Well Rd (Everglades to Oil Well Grade)A 21-25 $2,000,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $3,200,000 TBD Poinciana Professional Park C 23 $0 $0 $300,000 $1,600,000 $0 $300,000 60198a Veterans Memorial PH I & PH 2 R 21, D/A/C 22, R/D 23, C/M 24 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 60198b Veterans Memorial PH II HS to US 41 R 21, D/A/C 22, R/D 23, C/M 24 $1,000,000 $2,700,000 $13,400,000 $0 $0 $17,100,000 60199 Vanderbilt Beach Rd - US 41 to E of Goodlette D 21, D/C 25 $0 $0 $0 $13,500,000 $13,500,000 60147 Randall/Immokalee Road Intersection D/R 21, C/M 23 $2,500,000 $0 $12,600,000 $0 $0 $15,100,000 60219 Whippoorwill C 21-22 $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 60229 Wilson Blvd - GG Blvd to Immokalee Rd A 21, D/R 212, 23, C 24 $7,100,000 $0 $0 $20,500,000 $0 $27,600,000 TBD Santa Barbara/Logan turnlanes D 24, C 25 $0 $0 $0 $879,000 $7,879,000 $8,758,000 Sbttl Several Shoulder Widenings/Intersection Improvements $2,242,000 $3,000,000 $1,600,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,842,000 Sbttl Operations Improvements/Programs $15,804,000 $0 $17,625,000 $17,625,000 $12,925,000 $63,979,000 60085 TIS Reviews $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,250,000 60109 Planning Consulting $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,500,000 60163 Traffic Studies $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,500,000 Impact Fee Refunds $0 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,000,000 Debt Service Payments $13,317,000 $13,131,000 $13,136,000 $13,576,000 $0 $53,160,000 $153,379,000 $157,312,000 $163,671,000 $121,109,000 $57,170,000 $653,634,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL IF - Impact Fees / COA Revenue $15,460,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $77,460,000 Unfunded Needs $0 $0 $56,637,000 $43,500,000 $0 $100,137,000 GA - Gas Tax Revenue $23,052,000 $23,500,000 $23,750,000 $24,000,000 $24,250,000 $118,552,000 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $19,434,000 $4,928,000 $9,800,000 $0 $6,806,000 $40,968,000 CF - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $534,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $534,000 GF - General Fund 001 $9,067,000 $9,389,000 $9,389,000 $9,389,000 $9,389,000 $46,623,000 Sales Tax $22,782,000 $95,781,000 $35,851,000 $36,429,000 $0 $190,843,000 IN - Interest Revenue - Fund 313 Gas Tax & Impact Fees $2,245,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $5,245,000 CF - Carry Forward - 313-310 Impact Fees $59,834,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $59,834,000 REIM - Expected FEMA Reimbursement $0 $8,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,500,000 TR - MSTU General Fund 111 Transfers $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $15,000,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)($1,962,000)($2,025,000)($2,025,000)($2,025,000)($2,025,000)($10,062,000) REVENUE TOTAL $153,446,000 $159,573,000 $152,902,000 $130,793,000 $56,920,000 $653,634,000 CUMMULATIVE FOR FY22 CAPITAL FUNDING $27,801,000 $15,637,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR ROADS AND BRIDGE PROJECTS ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR ROADS AND BRIDGE PROJECT TOTALS I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\04 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNLPage 119 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1659 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Schedule of Capital Improvements Tables: 2020 Amendments EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL Big Corkscrew Park Equipmnt $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Big Corkscrew Park $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fund 346 Debt Service (2011 Bond)$2,824,529 $2,818,329 $2,820,429 $2,828,829 $2,857,929 $14,150,045 Fund 346 Debt Service (2013 Bond)$123,471 $123,471 $123,471 $123,471 $3,421,271 $3,915,155 Fund 346 Debt Service (2019 Loan)$765,100 $768,900 $2,919,000 $2,933,300 $4,704,600 $12,090,900 PARKS & RECREATION FACILITIES PROJECT TOTALS $3,713,100 $3,710,700 $5,862,900 $5,885,600 $10,983,800 $30,156,100 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL IF - Impact Fees / COA Revenue $10,575,000 $8,630,200 $8,788,300 $8,949,200 $9,093,900 $43,936,600 DIF - Deferred Impact Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 IN - Interest / Misc.$512,000 $512,000 $512,000 $512,000 $512,000 $2,560,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CF - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $10,835,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,835,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GF - General Fund 001 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE TOTAL $21,922,400 $9,142,200 $9,300,300 $9,461,200 $9,605,900 $57,332,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law) TR - Added Value through Commitments, Leases & Transfers SCHEDULE NOTES PARKS & RECREATION FACILITIES PROJECTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NOTE: All Community Park Land and Regional Park Land transactions are being facilitated through interdepartmental transfers exchanging land holdings for park lands, or using other methods not involving expenditure of capital funds. These transactions represent changes to the value of land holdings only. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\04 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNLPage 120 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1660 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Schedule of Capital Improvements Tables: 2020 Amendments EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL Countywide Programs, Planning & Maintenance $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $2,000,000 Infrastructure & Capacity Projects $25,005,000 $47,800,000 $33,600,000 $29,850,000 $18,850,000 $155,105,000 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $25,405,000 $48,200,000 $34,000,000 $30,250,000 $19,250,000 $157,105,000 Stormwater Management Operating $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Debt Service / Reserves $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS $25,405,000 $48,200,000 $34,000,000 $30,250,000 $19,250,000 $157,105,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GF - New Budget from Fund (310)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Debt Funding $14,402,000 $40,159,000 $5,439,000 $0 $0 $60,000,000 Unmet Funding Needs $0 $0 $20,520,000 $22,209,000 $11,209,000 $53,938,000 CF - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $2,919,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,919,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)($5,000)($3,000)($3,000)($3,000)($3,000)($17,000) IN - Interest Revenue - misc.$95,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $295,000 GF - New Budget from Fund (101)$4,869,000 $4,869,000 $4,869,000 $4,869,000 $4,869,000 $24,345,000 GF - New Budget from Fund (111)$3,125,000 $3,125,000 $3,125,000 $3,125,000 $3,125,000 $15,625,000 REVENUE TOTAL $25,405,000 $48,200,000 $34,000,000 $30,250,000 $19,250,000 $157,105,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE NOTES I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\04 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNLPage 121 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1661 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Schedule of Capital Improvements Tables: 2020 Amendments EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL Debt Service $11,443,500 $10,849,500 $9,053,000 $9,050,500 $8,767,000 $49,163,500 Expansion Related Projects $27,725,000 $18,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $45,725,000 Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $30,000,000 $29,335,000 $28,605,000 $29,535,000 $28,085,000 $145,560,000 Departmental Capital $740,000 $755,000 $770,000 $785,000 $801,000 $3,851,000 Reserve for Contingencies ‒ Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $3,000,000 $2,934,000 $2,861,000 $2,954,000 $2,809,000 $14,558,000 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $72,908,500 $61,873,500 $41,289,000 $42,324,500 $40,462,000 $258,857,500 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL WIF - Water System Development Fees / Impact Fees $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $32,000,000 RR - Reserve Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 B - Bond Proceeds $27,725,000 $18,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $45,725,000 LOC - Commercial Paper $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 WCA - Water Capital Account $740,000 $755,000 $770,000 $785,000 $801,000 $3,851,000 REV - Rate Revenue $38,043,500 $36,718,500 $34,119,000 $35,139,500 $33,261,000 $177,281,500 REVENUE TOTAL $72,908,500 $61,873,500 $41,289,000 $42,324,500 $40,462,000 $258,857,500 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE NOTES DATA SOURCES: -Expansion Related and Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects: FY 2021 is obtained from the 2021 Proposed Budget. FY 2022 to FY 2025 are from the FY 2019 Impact Fee Rate Study. -Department Capital: FY 2021 is obtained from the 2021 Proposed Budget, split 50/50 between Water and Wastewater. FY 2022 to FY 2025 are 2% increases over each fiscal year (pursuant to CPI adjustments per current Board policy). -Debt Service: All years are obtained from the Collier County Water and Sewer District Financial Statements and Other Reports, Summary of Debt Service requirements to maturity. Total Debt Service amount is split 50/50 between Water and Wastewater. -Reserve for Contingencies --Replacement and Rehabilitation Projects: NOTE: Collier County has adopted a two-year Concurrency Management System. Figures provided for years three, four and five of this Schedule of Capital Improvements are not part of the Concurrency Management System but must be financially feasible with a dedicated revenue source or an alternative revenue source if the dedicated revenue source is not realized. Revenue sources are estimates only; both the mix of sources and amounts will change when a rate study is completed. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\04 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNLPage 122 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1662 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Schedule of Capital Improvements Tables: 2020 Amendments EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT NOTES FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL TBD County Landfill Cell Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL LTF - Landfill Tipping Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROJECTS SCHEDULE NOTES SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROJECT TOTALS * Pursuant to the Landfill Operating Agreement (LOA) with Waste Management, Inc. of Florida (WMIF), landfill cell construction is scheduled and guaranteed by WMIF over the life of the Collier County Landfill. Collier County landfill expansion costs are paid for by WMIF through agreed upon Collier County landfill tipping fees. By contract under the LOA, WMIF will construct any future required cells. Landfill cells vary in size and disposal capacity. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\04 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNLPage 123 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1663 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Schedule of Capital Improvements Tables: 2020 Amendments EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 WASTEWATER COLLECTION & TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL Debt Service (CAFR)$11,443,500 $10,849,500 $9,053,000 $9,050,500 $8,767,000 $49,163,500 Expansion Related Projects $25,225,000 $0 $103,000,000 $0 $0 $128,225,000 Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $36,300,000 $35,750,000 $28,675,000 $29,695,000 $29,785,000 $160,205,000 Departmental Capital $740,000 $755,000 $770,000 $785,000 $801,000 $3,851,000 Reserve for Contingencies ‒ Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $3,630,000 $3,575,000 $2,868,000 $2,970,000 $2,979,000 $16,022,000 WASTEWATER COLLECTION & TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $77,338,500 $50,929,500 $144,366,000 $42,500,500 $42,332,000 $357,466,500 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL SIF - Wastewater System Development Fees / Impact Fees $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $33,000,000 RR - Reserve Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 B - Bond Proceeds $25,225,000 $0 $103,000,000 $0 $0 $128,225,000 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LOC - Commercial Paper, Additional Senior Lien $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SCA - Wastewater Capital Account - Transfers $740,000 $755,000 $770,000 $785,000 $801,000 $3,851,000 REV - Rate Revenue $44,773,500 $43,574,500 $33,996,000 $35,115,500 $34,931,000 $192,390,500 REVENUE TOTAL $77,338,500 $50,929,500 $144,366,000 $42,500,500 $42,332,000 $357,466,500 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE NOTES DATA SOURCES: -Expansion Related and Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects : FY 2021 is obtained from the 2021 Proposed Budget. FY 2022 to FY 2025 are estimated project costs. -Department Capital: FY 2021 is obtained from the 2021 Proposed Budget, split 50/50 between Water and Wastewater. FY 2022 to FY 2025 are 2% increases over each fiscal year (pursuant to CPI adjustments per current Board policy). -Debt Service: All years are obtained from the Collier County Water and Sewer District Financial Statements and Other Reports, Summary of Debt Service Requirements to maturity. Total Debt Service amount is split 50/50 between Water and Wastewater. -Reserve for Contingencies --Replacement and Rehabilitation Projects: NOTE: Collier County has adopted a two-year Concurrency Management System. Figures provided for years three, four and five of this Schedule of Capital Improvements are not part of the Concurrency Management System but must be financially feasible with a dedicated revenue source or an alternative revenue source if the dedicated revenue source is not realizedRevenue sources are estimates only; both the mix of sources and amounts will change when a rate study is conducted. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\04 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNLPage 124 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1664 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS COST AND REVENUE SUMMARY TABLE FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR ROADS AND BRIDGE PROJECTS Revenues:IF - Impact Fees / COA Revenue $77,460,000 Unfunded Needs $100,137,000 GA - Gas Tax Revenue $118,552,000 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $40,968,000 AC - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $534,000 GF - General Fund (001)$46,623,000 Supplemental OMB Funding $190,843,000 IN - Interest Revenue - Fund 313 Gas Tax & Impact Fees $5,245,000 TR - MSTU General Fund 111 Transfers $15,000,000 CF - Carry Forward - 313-310 Impact Fees $59,834,000 REIM - Expected FEMA Reimbursement $8,500,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)-$10,062,000 $653,634,000 Less Expenditures:$653,634,000 $653,634,000 Balance $0 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECTS Revenues:WIF - Water System Development Fees/Impact Fees $32,000,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 B - Bond Proceeds $45,725,000 LOC - Commercial Paper 1 $0 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 WCA - Water Capital Account $3,851,000 REV - Rate Revenue $177,281,500 $258,857,500 Less Expenditures:$258,857,500 $258,857,500 Balance $0 WASTEWATER COLLECTION & TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS Revenues:SIF - Wastewater System Development Fees/Impact Fees $33,000,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 B - Bond Proceeds $128,225,000 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 LOC - Commercial Paper, Additional Senior Lien $0 SCA - Wastewater Capital Account, Transfers $3,851,000 REV - Rate Revenue $192,390,500 $357,466,500 Less Expenditures:$357,466,500 $357,466,500 Balance $0 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROJECTS Revenues:LTF - Landfill Tipping Fees $0 $0 Less Expenditures:$0 $0 Balance $0 Revenues:IF - Impact Fees $43,936,600 DIF - Deferred Impact Fees $0 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 IN - Interest $2,560,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 $10,835,400 $0 GF - General Fund (001)$0 $57,332,000 Less Expenditures:$30,156,100 $57,332,000 Balance $27,175,900 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS Revenues: GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 GF - New Budget from Fund (310)$0 Debt Funding $60,000,000 Unmet Funding Needs $53,938,000 $2,919,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)-$17,000 IN - Interest Revenue $295,000 GF - New Budget from Fund (101)$24,345,000 GF - New Budget from Fund (111)$15,625,000 $157,105,000 Less Expenditures:$157,105,000 $157,105,000 Balance $0 TOTAL PROJECTS $1,457,219,100 TOTAL REVENUE SOURCES $1,484,395,000 AC - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service TR - Added Value through Commitments, Leases & Transfers CF - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service The table below itemizes the types of public facilities and the sources of revenue. The "Revenue Amount" column contains the 5-Year amount of facility revenues. The right column is a calculation of expenses versus revenues for each type of public facility. All deficits are accumulated as a subtotal. The subtotal deficit is the source of additional revenue utilized by Collier County to fund the deficit in order to maintain the levels of service standards as referenced in the Capital Improvement Element. Revenue Amount PARKS & RECREATION FACILITIES PROJECTS Projects Revenue Sources Expenditure Total I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\04 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNL Page 125 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1665 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 126 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1666 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Capital Improvement Element - Appendix Table: 2020 Amendments APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROAD PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sbttl Operations Improvements/Programs $15,000,000 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 $75,000,000 Sbttl Transfers to Other Funds $12,500,000 $12,500,000 $12,500,000 $12,500,000 $12,500,000 $62,500,000 Impact Fee Refunds $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,250,000 Capacity Improvement Projects - All Phases $40,710,000 $40,710,000 $10,710,000 $10,710,000 $10,710,000 $113,550,000 Debt Service Payments $14,600,000 $14,600,000 $14,600,000 $14,600,000 $14,600,000 $73,000,000 ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROAD PROJECT TOTALS $83,060,000 $83,060,000 $53,060,000 $53,060,000 $53,060,000 $325,300,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL TX - Sales Tax $30,000,000 $30,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $60,000,000 IF - Impact Fees / COA Revenue $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $77,500,000 GA - Gas Tax Revenue $24,000,000 $24,000,000 $24,000,000 $24,000,000 $24,000,000 $120,000,000 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 AC - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TR - Transfers $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GF - General Fund (001) $12,560,000 $12,560,000 $12,560,000 $12,560,000 $12,560,000 $62,800,000 DC - Developer Contribution Agreements / Advanced Reimbursements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 IN - Interest - Fund 313 (Gas Tax & Interest Impact Fees)$1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE TOTAL $83,060,000 $83,060,000 $53,060,000 $53,060,000 $53,060,000 $325,300,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE NOTES I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\05 CIE FY 26-30_20 AUIR CCPC FNL CIE Appendix - 1Page 127 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1667 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Capital Improvement Element - Appendix Table: 2020 Amendments APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES PROJECT TOTALS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL IF - Impact Fees / COA Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GF - General Fund (001) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SCHEDULE NOTES PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES PROJECTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NOTE: All Community Park Land and Regional Park Land transactions are being facilitated through interdepartmental transfers exchanging land holdings for park lands, or using other methods not involving expenditure of capital funds. These transactions represent changes to the value of land holdings only. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\05 CIE FY 26-30_20 AUIR CCPC FNL CIE Appendix - 2Page 128 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1668 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Capital Improvement Element - Appendix Table: 2020 Amendments APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL Stormwater Management System Projects $25,365,000 $25,365,000 $25,365,000 $25,365,000 $25,365,000 $126,825,000 Stormwater Management Operations & Reserves $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $175,000 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $127,000,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 AC - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CRA - Community Redevelopment Area / Municipal Service Taxing Unit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GF - General Fund (001) $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $127,000,000 REVENUE TOTAL $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $127,000,000 SCHEDULE NOTES Continuous CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\05 CIE FY 26-30_20 AUIR CCPC FNL CIE Appendix - 3Page 129 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1669 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Capital Improvement Element - Appendix Table: 2020 Amendments APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL Expansion Related Projects $5,833,000 $0 $14,667,000 $37,400,000 $0 $57,900,000 Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $29,085,000 $27,685,000 $27,435,000 $26,335,000 $25,585,000 $136,125,000 Debt Service $7,990,000 $7,171,500 $6,947,500 $8,034,000 $7,310,000 $37,453,000 Departmental Capital $817,000 $833,000 $850,000 $867,000 $884,000 $4,251,000 Reserve for Contingencies - Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $2,909,000 $2,769,000 $2,744,000 $2,634,000 $2,559,000 $13,615,000 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $46,634,000 $38,458,500 $52,643,500 $75,270,000 $36,338,000 $249,344,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL WIF - Water System Development Fees $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $32,000,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 B - Bond Proceeds $0 $0 $14,667,000 $37,400,000 $0 $52,067,000 SRF - State Revolving Loan Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 WCA - Water Capital Account $817,000 $833,000 $850,000 $867,000 $884,000 $4,251,000 REV - Rate Revenue $39,417,000 $31,225,500 $30,726,500 $30,603,000 $29,054,000 $161,026,000 REVENUE TOTAL $46,634,000 $38,458,500 $52,643,500 $75,270,000 $36,338,000 $249,344,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE NOTES NOTE: Collier County has adopted a two-year Concurrency Management System. Figures provided for years three, four and five of this Schedule of Capital Improvements are not part of the Concurrency Management System but must be financially feasible with a dedicated revenue source or an alternative revenue source if the dedicated revenue source is not realized. Figures provided for years six through ten of the Schedule of Capital Improvements are estimates of revenues versus project costs but do not constitute a long term concurrency system. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\05 CIE FY 26-30_20 AUIR CCPC FNL CIE Appendix - 4Page 130 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1670 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Capital Improvement Element - Appendix Table: 2020 Amendments APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL TBD County Landfill Cell Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL LTF - Landfill Tipping Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROJECTS SCHEDULE NOTES SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROJECT TOTALS NOTE: Collier County has adopted a two-year Concurrency Management System. Figures provided for years three, four and five of this Schedule of Capital Improvements are not part of the Concurrency Management System but must be financially feasible with a dedicated revenue source or an alternative revenue source if the dedicated revenue source is not realized. Figures provided for years six through ten of the Schedule of Capital Improvements are estimates of revenues versus project costs but do not constitute a long term concurrency system. * Pursuant to the Landfill Operating Agreement (LOA) with Waste Management, Inc. of Florida (WMIF), landfill cell construction is scheduled and guaranteed by WMIF over the life of the Collier County Landfill. Collier County landfill expansion costs are paid for by WMIF through agreed upon Collier County landfill tipping fees. By contract under the LOA, WMIF will construct any future required cells. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\05 CIE FY 26-30_20 AUIR CCPC FNL CIE Appendix - 5Page 131 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1671 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Capital Improvement Element - Appendix Table: 2020 Amendments APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL Expansion Related Projects $1,333,000 $103,000,000 $14,667,000 $0 $0 $119,000,000 Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $32,007,000 $29,830,000 $37,163,000 $31,330,000 $31,330,000 $161,660,000 Departmental Capital $817,000 $833,000 $850,000 $867,000 $884,000 $4,251,000 Debt Service $7,990,000 $7,171,500 $6,947,500 $8,034,000 $7,310,000 $37,453,000 Reserve for Contingencies - Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $3,201,000 $2,983,000 $3,716,000 $3,133,000 $3,133,000 $16,166,000 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $45,348,000 $143,817,500 $63,343,500 $43,364,000 $42,657,000 $338,530,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $33,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $103,000,000 $14,667,000 $0 $0 $117,667,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $817,000 $833,000 $850,000 $867,000 $884,000 $4,251,000 $37,931,000 $33,384,500 $41,226,500 $35,897,000 $35,173,000 $183,612,000 REVENUE TOTAL $45,348,000 $143,817,500 $63,343,500 $43,364,000 $42,657,000 $338,530,000 SCA - Wastewater Capital Account - Transfers REV - Rate Revenue SIF - Wastewater System Development Fees / Impact Fees RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE NOTES B - Bond Proceeds SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans LOC - Commercial Paper, Additional Senior Lien NOTE: Figures provided for years six through ten of the Schedule of Capital Improvements are estimates of revenues versus project costs but do not constitute a long-term concurrency system. Revenue sources are estimates only; both the mix of sources and amounts will change when a rate study is conducted. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\05 CIE FY 26-30_20 AUIR CCPC FNL CIE Appendix - 6Page 132 of 1339.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1672 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY COST AND REVENUE SUMMARY TABLE FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 Projects Revenue Sources Expenditure Total ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROAD PROJECTS Revenues:IF - Impact Fees / COA Revenue $77,500,000 GA - Gas Tax Revenue $120,000,000 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 AC - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $0 TR - Transfers $0 GF - General Fund (001) $62,800,000 $0 IN - Interest - Fund 313 (Gas Tax & Interest Impact Fees $5,000,000 TX - Gas Tax $60,000,000 $325,300,000 Less Expenditures:$325,300,000 $325,300,000 Balance $0 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECTS Revenues:WIF - Water System Development Fees $32,000,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 B - Bond Proceeds $52,067,000 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 WCA - Water Capital Account $4,251,000 REV - Rate Revenue $161,026,000 $249,344,000 Less Expenditures:$249,344,000 $249,344,000 Balance $0 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS Revenues:SIF - Wastewater System Development Fees $33,000,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 B - Bond Proceeds $117,667,000 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 LOC - Commercial Paper, Additional Senior Lien $0 SCA - Wastewater Capital Account $4,251,000 REV - Rate Revenue $183,612,000 $338,530,000 Less Expenditures:$338,530,000 $338,530,000 Balance $0 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROJECTS Revenues:LTF - Landfill Tipping Fees $0 $0 Less Expenditures:$0 $0 Balance $0 Revenues:IF - Impact Fees $0 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 GF - General Fund (001) $0 $0 Less Expenditures:$0 $0 Balance $0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS Revenues: GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 AC - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $0 CRA - Community Redevelopment Area/Municipal Service Taxing $0 GF - General Fund (001) $127,000,000 $127,000,000 Less Expenditures:$127,000,000 $127,000,000 Balance $0 TOTAL PROJECTS $1,040,174,000 TOTAL REVENUE SOURCES $1,040,174,000 The table below itemizes the types of public facilities and the sources of revenue. The "Revenue Amount" column contains the 5-Year amount of facility revenues. The right column is a calculation of expenses versus revenues for each type of public facility. All deficits are accumulated as a subtotal. The subtotal deficit is the source of additional revenue utilized by Collier County to fund the deficit in order to maintain the levels of service standards as referenced in the Capital Improvement Element. DC - Developer Contribution Agreements / Advanced Revenue Amount PARKS & RECREATION FACILITIES PROJECTS I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\05 CIE FY 26-30_20 AUIR CCPC FNL CIE Appendix - 7 Page 133 of 133 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 1673 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 1 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT ON PUBLIC FACILITIES 2020 CATEGORY “B” FACILITIES (Non-Concurrency Regulated) 1. County Jail & Correctional Facilities 2. Law Enforcement Facilities 3. Library − Buildings − Materials/Collections 4. Emergency Medical Services 5. Government Buildings Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 1 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1674 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COUNTY JAIL & CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES CONTENTS • COUNTY JAIL & CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES − SUMMARY • TABLE • CHART • JAILS & CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES − EXISTING INVENTORY − LOCATION MAP • COUNTY JAIL POPULATION TRENDS Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 2 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1675 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 2020 AUIR SUMMARY JAILS / CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES Facility Type: County Jail & Correctional Facilities (Category B) Level of Service Standard (LOSS): 2.79 beds per 1,000/population* Unit Cost: $93,084/floor space required/individual housed** Using the Countywide Peak Season population, the following is set forth: Units Value/Cost Available Inventory 9/30/20 1,304 $ 121,381,536 Required Inventory 9/30/25*** 1,420 $ 132,179,280 Proposed AUIR FY 2020/21 – FY 2024/25 0 $ 0 5-year Surplus or (Deficit) (116)**** $ 10,797,744 Expenditures Proposed AUIR FY 2020/21 – FY 2024/25 Projects $ 0 Debt Service Payments on 2013 Bond $ 1,570,200 Debt Service Payments on 2010 & 2011 Bond $ 8,886,600 Total Expenditures $ 10,456,800 Revenues Impact Fees $ 6,999,300 Interest $ 60,000 Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $ 1,953,700 Loan from Countywide Capital Projects (Gen Fund) $ 1,443,800 Total Revenues $ 10,456,800 Surplus or (Deficit) Revenues for 5-year Capital Program $ 0 Revenues needed to maintain existing LOSS $ 0 Recommendation: That the BCC approve the proposed Jails / Correctional Facilities AUIR for FY 2020/21 – FY 2024/25. Footnotes: * The previous Level of Service Standard (LOSS) of 3.2 beds per 1,000/population was adjusted to the current 2.79 beds per 1,000/population by the BCC as part of their adoption of the 2009 AUIR. ** Unit cost value indexed per 2017 Impact Fee Update from previous value of $80,979 for the floor space required for each individual housed. *** The required inventory does not attempt to predict future possible increases or decreases in land, building and equipment costs. **** The Immokalee Jail Center (IJC) is a 192-bed adult detention center and booking facility. The IJC processes about 18% of all arrests in the County. The facility also processes, and registers convicted felons and sex offenders, maintains a video visitation link with Naples Jail Center, and conducts a Working Weekend Program. Page 3 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1676 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) CCSO Comments: Mental Health and Medical Facility- the Jail Master Plan Update completed in 2017 identified a deficit of appropriate housing for Medical/Mental Health inmates and projected a growth in the numbers of these inmates for the foreseeable near future. At the current time, an old housing dorm has been repurposed as a Female Medical/Mental Health unit and does not comply with ADA standards, creating a need to house females who are disabled and infirmed in the Male Medical/Mental Health Unit which is also problematic. The Corrections Department is also in need of additional office space for the Community Corrections Programming. This includes the Pretrial Supervision Program which reduces the costs of housing for pretrial offenders who are assessed to not be a danger to the community. County staff recently engaged an outside firm, Stantec, to study options of either rebuilding current space, building new space, or a combination of both to relieve these problems. The updates for these purposes are needed now. Page 4 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1677 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 2020 AUIR Jail Facilities (Peak Season) LOSS: 2.79 Beds / 1,000 Population* SURPLUS OR POPULATION BEDS BEDS BEDS SURPLUS/(DEFICIENCY) AT FISCAL CO-WIDE REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) YEAR 0.00279 IN AUIR**93,084 2020-21 474,299 1,323 0 1,304 (19)($1,768,596) 2021-22 483,001 1,348 0 1,304 (44)($4,095,696) 2022-23 491,863 1,372 0 1,304 (68)($6,329,712) 2023-24 500,887 1,397 0 1,304 (93)($8,656,812) 2024-25 508,998 1,420 0 1,304 (116)($10,797,744) 1st 5-Year Growth (2021-25)34,699 97 0 2025-26 516,165 1,440 0 1,304 (136)($12,659,424) 2026-27 523,433 1,460 64 1,368 (92)($8,563,728) 2027-28 530,803 1,481 0 1,368 (113)($10,518,492) 2028-29 538,277 1,502 0 1,368 (134)($12,473,256) 2029-30 545,033 1,521 0 1,368 (153)($14,241,852) 2nd 5-Year Growth (2025-29)28,868 81 0 64 Total 10-Year Growth (2020-29)63,567 177 0 64 **Due to budgetary constraints only the Immokalee Jail expansion is being proposed within the 10 year planning window. Inmate population will be analyzed on an annual basis to determine actual need prior to any expansion being programmed any earlier than year 7. * During the 2009 AUIR the BCC adjusted the current level of service standard from 3.2 beds per 1,000 population to 2.79 beds per 1,000 population. The motion passed 5 to 0.It should also be noted that not all available beds can be occupied at any given time,due to restrictions associated with the inability to house specific types of offenders within the general jail population. Please reference the Collier County Sheriff's Office, Jail Facilities "Average Daily Population"by Month,and by Year statistics sheet included herein. Page 5 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1678 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 1,180 1,230 1,280 1,330 1,380 1,430 1,480 420,000 440,000 460,000 480,000 500,000 520,000 540,000 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2025-26 2026-27 BedsPopulation2020 AUIR Jail Facilities, LOSS: 2.79 Beds / 1,000 Population (Peak Season) Unit Cost: $93,084 Population & Beds Required Beds Available Immokalee Jail Bed Addition Page 6 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1679 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 2 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE – JAIL POPULATION Average Daily Jail Population / Cost per Inmate 893 875 988 910 872 797 783 757 842 789 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Average Daily Jail Population, Fiscal Year Month 2017 16/17 Chg Cost/Day 2018 17/18 Chg Cost/Day 2019 18/19 Chg Cost/Day Oct 744 -7.23% $151.60 823 10.62% $146.48 858 4.25% $145.99 Nov 701 -9.31% $160.90 837 19.40% $144.03 808 -3.46% $155.03 Dec 679 -13.28% $166.11 840 23.71% $143.52 773 -7.98% $162.05 Jan 731 -10.31% $154.29 810 10.81% $148.83 803 -0.86% $155.99 Feb 757 -6.54% $149.00 823 8.72% $146.48 826 0.36% $151.65 Mar 755 -5.74% $149.39 829 9.80% $145.42 809 -2.41% $154.84 Apr 768 -1.16% $146.86 837 8.98% $144.03 791 -5.50% $158.36 May 783 -0.38% $144.05 865 10.47% $139.37 803 -7.17% $155.99 Jun 771 -2.59% $146.29 853 10.64% $141.33 760 -10.90% $164.82 Jul 789 2.73% $142.95 859 8.87% $140.34 731 -14.90% $171.36 Aug 800 8.84% $140.99 866 8.25% $139.21 742 -14.32% $168.82 Sep 803 6.92% $140.46 861 7.22% $140.02 758 -11.96% $165.25 FY Avg 757 -3.17% $149.04 842 11.46% $143.19 789 -6.29% $158.86 Page 7 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1680 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) m m SR 82 CR 833 CR 846 IMMOKALEE RD TAM I A M I T R A I L OIL WELL RD LOOP RD.CR 858CR 869 CORKSCREW RD CR 951EVERGLADES BLVDES T E R O B L V DSUMMERLIN RDGOLDEN GATE BLVD DAVIS BLVD CR 29ALICO RD RADIO RD PINE RIDGE RD DANIALS PKWY VANDERBILT BEACH RD BONITA BEACH RDDEL PADRO PKWYSANTA BARBARA BL SR 29 US 41 TAMIAMI TRAIL GOLDEN GATE PKWYAIRPORT RDRATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RDGOODLETTE RDTAMIAMI TRAILLIVINGSTON RDSR 82 IMMOKALEE RD LAKETRAFFORD LAKE TRAFFORD RD I-75 I-75 2 0 2 0 J A I L S - E X I S T I N G I N V E N T O R Y 2 0 2 0 J A I L S - E X I S T I N G I N V E N T O R Y NAPLES MARCO ISLAND IMMOKALEE EVERGLADES CITYGULFOFMEXICO§¨¦75 !(29 !(29 !(951 !(951 !(92 !(29 !(82 . 0 3 6 9 121.5 Miles GIS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LEE COUNTY HENDRYCOUNTY9 F l o r i d a G u l f F l o r i d a G u l fC o a s t U n i v e r s i t y C o a s t U n i v e r s i t y Legend Major Roads A v e M a r i a T o w n A v e M a r i a T o w n a n d U n i v e r s i t y a n d U n i v e r s i t y Existing Jail Naples Jail Immokalee Jail $+41 $+41 $+41 A v e M a r i a T o w n A v e M a r i a T o w n a n d U n i v e r i s t y a n d U n i v e r i s t y §¨¦75 §¨¦75 m Page 8 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1681 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT FACILITIES CONTENTS • COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT FACILITIES − SUMMARY • TABLE • CHART • EXISTING AND LEASED LAW ENFORCEMENT BUILDINGS – MAP • EXISTING AND LEASED LAW ENFORCEMENT BUILDINGS – INVENTORY • EXISTING AND LEASED LAW ENFORCEMENT BUILDINGS – INFORMATIONAL SUPPLEMENT • COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE CALLS FOR SERVICE OVER LAST 5-YEAR PERIOD • COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE CRIMES AND CRIME RATES • COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE DISTRICT BOUNDARIES – MAP Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 9 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1682 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 2020 AUIR SUMMARY LAW ENFORCEMENT FACILITIES Facility Type: Law Enforcement (Category B) Level of Service Standard (LOSS): 0.9089 sq. ft. per capita1 Unit Cost: $362.00 per sq. ft.2 Using the Unincorporated Area Peak Season and the Everglades City populations, the following is set forth: Sq. Ft. Value/Cost Available Inventory 9/30/20 296,651 $ 107,387,662 Required Inventory 9/30/25 418,087 $ 151,347,494 Proposed AUIR FY 2020/21 − FY 2024/25 (+99,000 sq. ft.) 395,6513 $ 143,225,662 5-year Surplus or (Deficit) (22,436) $ (8,121,832) Expenditures Proposed AUIR FY 2020/21 – FY 2024/25 Projects $ 35,838,000 Debt Service Payments for 2013 Bond $ 1,451,500 Debt Service Payments for 2010/2017 Bond $ 5,648,500 Debt Service Payments for 2011 Bond $ 2,215,000 Total Expenditures $ 45,153,000 Revenues Infrastructure Sales Tax $ 33,000,000 Impact Fees Anticipated $ 7,271,700 Interest $ 100,000 Loans from Countywide Capital Projects (Gen Fund) $ 303,700 Available Cash for Future Projects/Payments of Debt Service $ 1,639,600 Total Revenues $ 42,315,000 Surplus or (Deficit) Revenues for 5-year Capital Program ($ 2,838,000) Additional Revenues needed to achieve Proposed LOSS $ 2,838,000 Recommendation: That the BCC approve the proposed Law Enforcement AUIR for FY 2020/21 − FY 2024/25. Footnotes: 1. Level of Service Standard reflects actual square footage available plus 5-year capital plan and move of the Evidence/Forensic Science Building into the 5-year capital plan. 2. Unit cost value is based upon cost estimate for the Orangetree permanent station. 3. These expansion/relocation projects reflect the Evidence/Forensic Science Building, in addition to that square footage above the square footage already inventoried in existing substations. Page 10 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1683 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) CCSO Comments: Forensic and Evidence Building- This Facility is currently being designed as part of the Government Operations Business Park (GOBP). The $33 million dollar funding is from the surtax approved previously by the citizens of Collier County. CCSO elements planned for this facility are Crime Scene, Evidence, Technical Services, and Criminal Investigations. The design has reached the 20% concept and is currently being reviewed by the BOCC Project team and CCSO. Review and further adjustments to the 20% are forthcoming. We are also awaiting the approval of the Construction Manager at Risk to be approved. Patrol Administration and Youth Relation Administration- Once the groups mentioned above move to the Forensics and Evidence Facility the goal is to vacate the current Horseshoe Drive facility. In order for this to happen, the Patrol and Youth Relations Administrative functions will need a new headquarters. It is preferred they be relocated to the main government campus. An ideal location would be the current BOCC Facilities and Operations Facility once they relocate or Parts of the Health Facility. Parking for numerous trailers and large command vehicles will be of concern. Facility needs included in previous years AUIR submissions: District 1 Substation- As per the 2018 and 2019 AUIR there is still an urgent need for a more centralized location for this substation within the North Naples area. In addition to crowded CCSO staff work space at this location, we continue to struggle with both inadequate parking and security issues at this site. CCSO has submitted the Property Evaluation forms to the BOCC Real Property staff to begin researching a suitable location for a new substation. The BOCC and North Collier Fire Department (NCFD) are in agreement that co-locating is in the best interest of both the CCSO and NCFD. District 5 Substation- As per the 2018 AUIR, the D-5 substation has been relocated to a temporary leased spaced within this Patrol district in the Southeast Naples area. Finding a more suitable BOCC owned facility is still the goal. Property Evaluation Forms have been submitted to the BOCC Real Property staff. At this time, research is still being performed to find the ideal location within the D-5 Patrol district. *CCSO staff is in support of co-locating with other emergency services at a more suitable location for these and future substations. CCSO Training/Gun Range- Currently, the CCSO holds firearms training for its members at an outdoor range located in the Golden Gate Estates area. Firearms trainings occur daily, resulting in heavy traffic not only from the CCSO, but from other entities that train at our facility. In addition to the firearms training, many classes are held at the indoor training classrooms. We also hold outdoor obstacle and tactical training classes at this location. BOCC Facilities staff is currently working to make safety and substantial drainage improvements to accommodate CCSO’s short term needs at this facility. Due to the increased home construction taking place surrounding the current range, CCSO is requesting a training facility to be considered in the AUIR for our firearms and training needs. Page 11 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1684 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 2020 AUIR Law Enforcement (Peak Season) 0.9089 sq. ft./capita POPULATION REQUIRED SQ. FT.SQ. FT.SURPLUS SURPLUS OR (DEFICIT) (UNINCORPORATED AREA + EVERGLADES CITY) SQUARE FOOTAGE PER CAPITA PLANNED AVAILABLE OR (DEFICIT)@ $362 IN AUIR 296,651 SQ. FT.PER SQ. FT.* 2020-21 427,145 388,232 0 296,651 (91,581)($33,152,355) 2021-22 435,389 395,725 4,500 301,151 (94,574)($34,235,810) 2022-23 443,794 403,364 4500 305,651 (97,713)($35,372,239) 2023-24 458,360 416,603 90,000 395,651 (20,952)($7,584,770) 2024-25 459,992 418,087 0 395,651 (22,436)($8,121,734) 1st 5-Year Growth (2021-25)32,847 29,855 99,000 2025-26 466,660 424,147 0 395,651 (28,496)($10,315,651) 2026-27 473,426 430,297 0 395,651 (34,646)($12,541,813) 2027-28 480,296 436,541 0 395,651 (40,890)($14,802,192) 2028-29 487,270 442,880 0 395,651 (47,229)($17,096,790) 2029-30 493,497 448,539 0 395,651 (52,888)($19,145,609) 2nd 5-Year Growth (2029-30)33,505 30,453 0 Total 10-Year Growth (2021-30)66,352 60,307 99,000 FISCAL YEARS Page 12 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1685 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 550,000 305,000 330,000 355,000 380,000 405,000 430,000 455,000 480,000 505,000 530,000 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2027-28 Square FeetPopulation2019 AUIR Law Enforcement (Peak Season) Proposed LOSS: 0.9089 sq. ft. per capita Population & Inventory Required Inventory Available Forensic Science Facility District 1 Substation District 5 SubstationPage 13 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1686 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ SR 82 CR 833 CR 846 IMMOKALEE RD TAM I A M I T R A I L OIL WELL RD LOOP RD.CR 858CR 869 CORKSCREW RD EVERGLADES BLVDES T E R O B L V D SUMMERLIN RDGOLDEN GATE BLVD DAVIS BLVD CR 29ALICO RD RADIO RD PINE RIDGE RD DANIALS PKWY VANDERBILT BEACH RD BONITA BEACH RDDEL PADRO PKWYSANTA BARBARA BL SR 29 US 41 TAMIAMI TRAIL GOLDEN GATE PKWYAIRPORT RDRATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RDGOODLETTE RDTAMIAMI TRAILLIVINGSTON RDSR 82 IMMOKALEE RD LAKETRAFFORD LAKE TRAFFORD RD 70th AVE. NE 2 0 2 0 L A W E N F O R C E M E N T B U I L D I N G S 2 0 2 0 L A W E N F O R C E M E N T B U I L D I N G S NAPLES MARCO ISLAND IMMOKALEE EVERGLADES CITYGULFOFMEXICO§¨¦75 !(29 !(29 !(951 !(92 !(29 !(82 . 0 3 6 9 121.5 Miles GIS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICP GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LEE COUNTY HENDRYCOUNTY9 F l o r i d a G u l f F l o r i d a G u l fC o a s t U n i v e r s i t y C o a s t U n i v e r s i t y A v e M a r i a T o w n A v e M a r i a T o w n a n d U n i v e r s i t y a n d U n i v e r s i t y Special OperationsNaples Airport Building J - CCSOHeadquarters GG Sheriff Substation Marco Sheriff Substation Immokalee Substation Sheriff CID Building SO. Range Control Building N. Naples Substation §¨¦75 §¨¦75 $+41 $+41 $+41 ESC-E. Naples Substation Fleet Project - Phase IISheriff Fleet District 5 Substation Legend ²³ Major Roads ²³Leased Station Existing Station Facilities New GG Estates CCSO Substation Page 14 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1687 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 1 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE - CALLS FOR SERVICE Calls for Service by Call Source Citizen-Generated Calls for Service Average Response Time (Min.) by District 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 D1 – North Naples 9.0 9.1 9.1 9.2 9.2 9.1 9.0 9.1 9.6 D2 – Golden Gate 8.2 8.7 9.7 9.9 9.7 10.1 9.3 9.7 9.6 D3 – East Naples 9.5 9.7 10.0 10.6 11.0 11.1 10.7 10.3 10.7 D4 – Estates 11.0 10.5 9.9 10.1 10.9 11.2 11.1 11.5 11.9 D5 - Everglades -- -- -- -- -- -- 8.2 8.9 9.2 D7 – Everglades 12.8 13.6 13.8 12.8 12.1 12.6 12.4 -- D8 – Immokalee 6.0 5.9 5.8 6.3 6.5 6.5 6.9 7.0 7.9 Response times represent average time in minutes from dispatch-to-arrival for citizen-generated calls for service (RT>60 removed). Districts 3 and 7 boundaries changed, created a new District 5 in November 2017; District 7 no longer exists. 8.8 9.0 9.3 9.6 9.7 9.8 9.5 9.5 9.9 1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Citizen-Generated Calls -Average Response Time Year Citizen Agency Total 2009 130,500 379,387 509,887 2010 127,599 352,656 480,255 2011 133,315 305,869 439,184 2012 135,696 287,801 423,497 2013 137,447 283,799 421,246 2014 148,283 265,792 414,075 2015 152,894 262,546 415,440 2016 161,047 248,670 409,717 2017 174,080 246,099 420,179 2018 170,261 243,849 414,110 2019 172,232 269,578 441,810 130,500127,599133,315135,696137,447148,283152,894161,047174,080170,261172,232379,387352,656305,869287,801283,799265,792262,546248,670246,099243,849269,5780 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 Calls for Service, by Call Source Citizen-Generated Agency-Generated Page 15 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1688 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 3 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE – CRIME RATE Crime rate is calculated per 100,000 residents and includes Part I UCR-reported crimes to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. 306925672403223621562135202720162173189317631763165815741508141314030 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Collier County Sheriff's Office Crime Rate per 100,000 Page 16 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1689 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 17 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1690 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COUNTY LIBRARY BUILDINGS AND MATERIALS/ COLLECTIONS CONTENTS •COUNTY LIBRARY BUILDINGS − SUMMARY •TABLE •CHART •COUNTY LIBRARY MATERIALS/COLLECTIONS − SUMMARY •TABLE •CHART •LIBRARY BUILDING INVENTORY − LOCATION MAP •LIBRARY BUILDING AND COLLECTION INVENTORY •LIBRARY BUILDING USE OVER LAST 5 YEAR PERIOD •LIBRARY COLLECTION CIRCULATION OVER LAST 5 YEAR PERIOD Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 18 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1691 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 2020 AUIR SUMMARY LIBRARY BUILDING FACILITIES Facility Type: Library Buildings (Category B) Level of Service Standard (LOSS): 0.33 sq.ft./capita Unit Cost: $263.41 per sq.ft. Using the Countywide Peak Season population, the following is set forth: Square Feet Value/Cost Available Inventory as of 9/30/20 174,082 * $ 45,854,940 Required Inventory as of 9/30/25 164,226 $ 43,258,771 Proposed AUIR FY 2020/21 − FY 2024/25 0 $ 0 5-year Surplus or (Deficit) 9,856 $ 2,596,169 Expenditures Proposed AUIR FY 2020/21 ─ FY 2024/25 $ 0 2010/2017 & 2010B Bonds Debt Service Payments $ 3,967,400 Total Expenditures $ 3,967,400 Revenues Impact Fees $ 4,018,000 Interest/Misc. Income $ 55,000 Carry Forward (unspent cash as of 9/30/2020) $ 769,700 Loan from Countywide Capital Projects (General Fund) to assist with debt service payments $ 0 Total Revenues $ 4,842,700 Surplus or (Deficit) Revenues $ 875,300 Revenues needed to maintain existing LOSS none Recommendation: That the CCPC forward a recommendation of approval to the BCC for the proposed “Library Buildings AUIR for FY 2020/21 − FY 2024/25”. Footnotes: * Total available square footage was reduced by 7,000 sq. ft. in the 2019 AUIR to reflect the re-purposing of the old Golden Gate Library building for use by Collier Senior Resources. Page 19 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1692 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Library Division Comments: Regional and Branch Facility Use – The Collier County Public Library (CCPL) Community Assessment completed in 2017 identified internet access and access to study/reading rooms key components of patrons’ utility infrastructure, or necessary function for education, employment, families, etc. Further as part of the assessment, library patrons stated regional and branch libraries should designed as “hub libraries” to reflect specific areas of concentration, expertise, and programming based on community need. Study rooms, reading rooms, and/or designated quiet areas should be a goal at all locations. The Library Division will be initiating a master plan study in FY 2021 to synthesize the recommendations from the 2017 Community Assessment, projected long range growth of Collier County, and on-going surveys of patron needs. Required Level of Service Standard (LOSS) – The 2020 AUIR identifies a square footage deficiency beginning in FY 2028. CCPL has partnered with Collier Senior Resources to submit a CDBG-MIT grant to remodel/expand the old Golden Gate Library including approximately 1,900 sq. ft. of meeting room space for the Library partially addressing the identified deficiency. CCPL is in possession of approximately 2.72 acres in the Fiddler’s Creek Development that is restricted for Library use. The future master plan study will also identify other areas in need of library space which will provide CCPL direction in addressing this future deficiency. Page 20 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1693 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) POPULATION SQ FT SQ FT SQ FT SURPLUS/VALUE OR FISCAL CO-WIDE REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)(COST) AT YEAR 0.33 IN AUIR $263.41 2020-21 474,299 156,519 0 174,082 17,563 $4,626,349 2021-22 483,001 159,390 0 174,082 14,692 $3,869,941 2022-23 491,863 162,315 0 174,082 11,767 $3,099,598 2023-24 500,887 165,293 0 174,082 8,789 $2,315,190 2024-25 508,998 167,969 0 174,082 6,113 $1,610,146 1st 5-Year Growth (2021-2025)34,699 11,451 2025-26 516,165 170,335 0 174,082 3,748 $987,129 2026-27 523,433 172,733 0 174,082 1,349 $355,366 2027-28 530,803 175,165 0 174,082 (1,083)($285,273) 2028-29 538,277 177,631 0 174,082 (3,549)($934,947) 2029-2030 545,033 179,861 0 174,082 (5,779)($1,522,220) 2nd 5-Year Growth (2026-2030)28,868 9,526 Total 10-Year Growth (2021-2030)63,567 20,977 2020 AUIR Library Buildings LOSS: .33 sq ft per capita Page 21 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1694 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Eo -g CLoo- 600,000 550,000 500,000 450,000 400,000 2020 AUIR Library Building LOSS: 0.33 SQ. FT. / Capita (Peak Season) .+Population & SQ. FT. Required -.0-Square Feet Available oolJ. o (E cro 55,5001 195,500 185,500 175,500 165,500 145,500 135,500 125,500 4FF -.]''t- (}E -=- -1''- Y -)'J -t]'t- -F 350,000 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-2030 115,500Page 22 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1695 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 2020 AUIR SUMMARY LIBRARY COLLECTIONS Facility Type: Library Materials/Collections (Category B) Current Level of Service Standard (LOSS): 1.87 items/capita1 Achieved Level of Service Standard (LOSS): 1.33 items/capita2 Unit Cost: $25.84 per volume3 Using the Countywide Peak Season population, the following is set forth: Items Value/Cost Available Inventory as of 9/30/204 618,932 $15,993,202 Required Inventory as of 9/30/25 951,826 $24,595,183 Proposed AUIR FY 2020/21 − FY 2024/25 332,894 $ 8,601,981 5-year Surplus or (Deficit) 0 $ 0 Expenditures Proposed AUIR FY 2020/21 − FY 2024/25 $ 8,601,981 Total Expenditures $ 8,601,981 Revenues Impact Fees allocated to new materials5 $ 0 Grants and Donations6 $ 8,601,981 Total Revenues $ 8,601,981 Additional Revenues needed to maintain existing LOSS none Recommendation: That the CCPC forward a recommendation of approval to the BCC for the proposed “Library Collections AUIR for FY 2020/21 − FY 2024/25”. Footnotes: 1. Existing Level of Service Standard as adopted in the 2007 AUIR. The 2006 AUIR LOSS of 1.75 books/capita was increased with the adoption of a recognized LOSS for items in all formats, not just physical books. 2. Achieved Level of Service Standard reflects actual collection item inventory per capita. 3. Unit cost is based on an average cost of an item across all formats and is established as part of each Impact Fee Update Study. 4. Available inventory includes items in progress of being purchased. 5. All Impact Fee Revenue is used to pay down Library Debt Service on the construction of Headquarters, South Regional, and Golden Gate Libraries. 6. Due to the Library’s payment on Debt Services, new materials must be funded through other sources of revenue. Currently the Library allocates private donations, annual State Aid to Libraries Grant funds, and General Fund monies to acquire new materials. Page 23 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1696 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Library Division Comments: Library Inventory Count - increased by 13,220 items, or 2.2%, during FY 2020. The 2.2% increase is a combination of growth and replacement books and does not allow the Library Division to build, or increase, the collection to meet the AUIR LOSS of 1.87 items per capita. The Library can only maintain an actual LOSS of 1.33 items per capita with current funding restraints. The Library Division would have to spend approximately $8.6 million over the next five (5) years to acquire an additional 332,894 titles to meet the established AUIR LOSS of 1.87 items per capita. Current Library funding levels are insufficient for the Library to meet the AUIR LOSS of 1.87 items per capita and insufficient to cover the total annual cost of growth and replacement of materials by FY 2025 due to the fact all Library Impact Fee Revenue is diverted to pay debt services on the prior building of Headquarters, South Regional, and Golden Gate Libraries. An overall LOSS analysis will be completed as part of the next Library Impact Fee Update Study in 2021 with possible recommendations to adjust the Library’s LOSS for materials/collections. Page 24 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1697 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 19crt.Nlo^ioD c|oIDdcNdD aaD-19c,)^nD oaloND Noc,ltoN19_D oQ oo oD oa cDDN3^NoN os-oN ooo-lo Nloo^o N,?-lo o o o o o Nng)- D lo N 19n^ u)o(o N no t,ilo N!o]\^o o N(o(qd @o (0No- u)o)IF oND.€ (D No(o- N(,) o) E |{, 'doo^ N ry IDq oolo- ro ro oo lo^ (olo oo(o- (o(o oo to_ r0r0 to)$- (o r0 ,) |o^ 1') ND\rt lo ')-19 <ft9 lo- Nr cio,)-c D ')!9tr ioDD N Nrtc ') $D\t) cn tDn ro_ (o lv)o) toNo- r(, o) Fh o(l @^ @ g) (\o @_ No)o) oo ro^ (ooo- N N t) c rt|r)\nt0$ ct)ot,t \f + C)o- to€It a9(o o^ CDrt @ @^oolo @o) o)^ @olo (9(qit- noNlo (Y)o @-o(v)ro 6I€(9lo (9 ..)o^ r{,stro o Jo NIoNoN NNI NoN (v)(\ I(\ (\aoN \t6lI C.) C\oN ro(\ at(\lo(\ F. nt(o o{ot\ oNI NoN E CL (EI,o.EbT,E CL f I9<6 kR9;o-I\orE0q5- =rnoo tF3 is=, 'a 4tJ.it\s u*oD 29uJoo dt =2=lUF-zE rtt)D- Nrtlq nc .rf- !) ioDn- o cD\39rf zefl E 5tJ gF dHo zeutFOl= Brio- rfi nDai9o c Dt' (t) C')(o+ro loio d io Dtoq DN lo ta)- rlDlo (o c{Il.)NoN c',NIDNcN o 19ot\I NoN ,tr =e(, a! C' a E o Page 25 of 1059.A.3.cPacket Pg. 1698Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) tro g f CLoo. 557,500 531,500 505,500 479,500 427,500 ,500345 1,050,000 1,000,000 950,000 900,000 850,000 800,000 750,000 700,000 oco og 6o 401,500 375,500 349,500 +Population & Collections Required 5Q6llgqliqns Available 2020 AUIR Library Collections LOSS: 1.87 ltems / Capita (Peak Season) Unit Cost: $25.84 per item J;,4 4 E =F t' 'F 332,894 items to reach LOSS 1.87 items/capita at a cost of $8.6 million I / / / / / { 323,500 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 650,000 / /Page 26 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1699 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Æc Æc Æc Æc Æc Æc Æc Æc Æc Æc Estates Library Golden Gate Library South Regional LibraryEast Naples Library Naples Library SR 82 CR 833 CR 846 IMMOKALEE RD TAM I A M I T R A I L OIL WELL RD LOOP RD.CR 858CR 869 CORKSCREW RD SR 951CR 951EVERGLADES BLVDES T E R O B L V DSUMMERLIN RDGOLDEN GATE BLVD DAVIS BLVD CR 29ALICO RD RADIO RD PINE RIDGE RD DANIALS PKWY VANDERBILT BEACH RD BONITA BEACH RDDEL PADRO PKWYSANTA BARBARA BLSR 29US 41 TAMIAMI TRAILAIRPORT RDRATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RDGOODLETTE RDTAMIAMI TRAILLIVINGSTON RDSR 82 IMMOKALEE RD LAKETRAFFORD LAKE TRAFFORD RD 2020 LIBRARY BUILDING INVENTORY NAPLES MARCO ISLAND IMMOKALEE EVERGLADES CITYGULFOFMEXICO§¨¦75 §¨¦75 §¨¦75 §¨¦75 !(29 !(29 !(951 !(951 !(92 . 0 3 6 9 121.5 Miles GIS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LEE COUNTY HENDRYCOUNTY9 F l o r i d a G u l f F l o r i d a G u l fC o a s t U n i v e r s i t y C o a s t U n i v e r s i t y A v e M a r i a T o w n A v e M a r i a T o w n a n d U n i v e r i s t y a n d U n i v e r i s t y Headquarters Library Vanderbilt Beach Library Marco Island Library Everglades City Library Immokalee Library $+41 $+41 $+41 Legend Existing Library Major Roads Æc Page 27 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1700 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Commisioner District Library Address Type Square Footage 1 South Regional 8065 Lely Cultural Pkwy Regional 30,000 1 Marco Island 210 S Heathwood Drive Branch 15,600 1 East Naples 8787 Tamiami Trail E Branch 6,600 2 Headquarters 2385 Orange Blossom Drive Regional 42,000 2 Vanderbilt Beach 788 Vanderbilt Beach Road Branch 7,000 3 Golden Gate 2432 Lucerne Road Branch 17,000 4 Naples Regional 650 Central Avenue Regional 35,800 5 Immokalee 417 N 1st Street Branch 8,000 5 Estates 1266 Golden Gate Blvd W Branch 11,182 5 Everglades City*102 Copeland Avenue N Branch 900 174,082 Collection Location Inventory System-wide**555,804 61,828 1,300 618,932 Physical Materials (Books, DVDs, CDs, etc. ) eBooks / eAudio Streaming TOTAL Library Materials (all formats) ** Library Materials move throughout the system and can be returned to any library where they will reside until requested and/or checked-out. TOTAL Library Facility Sq. Ft. 2020 LIBRARY BUILDING INVENTORY * Everglades City Branch Library is housed within the Everglades City Courthouse. 2020 LIBRARY MATERIALS INVENTORY Type of Material Page 28 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1701 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY – FACILITY USAGE Foot Traffic, or door counts, record all patrons entering into a Library facility. Additional metrics are gathered to show what Library services and resources patrons are using. The data gathered is then used to ensure the Library Division is meeting the 2018-2022 Strategic Plan goals and objectives, the recommendations from the 2017 Community Assessment , and making optimum use of the AUIR LOSS of .33 sq. ft./capita. 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 South Regional 160,116 153,621 138,160 138,015 143,884 Marco Island 109,723 140,620 129,719 135,135 119,414 East Naples 81,397 82,385 76,115 68,466 70,132 Headquarters 333,804 385,059 341,683 301,132 321,634 Vanderbilt Beach 88,408 86,994 95,006 102,079 97,233 Golden Gate 187,124 181,701 159,837 121,174 105,517 Naples Regional 240,456 225,169 214,559 219,128 196,413 Immokalee 84,220 84,127 80,941 54,535 53,956 Estates 55,820 49,676 49,032 52,305 62,538 TOTALS 1,341,068 1,389,352 1,285,052 1,191,969 1,170,721 Foot Traffic by Library Page 29 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1702 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 South Regional 43,264 37,093 38,107 35,215 40,019 Marco Island 15,672 17,106 18,780 15,894 14,090 East Naples 17,313 15,929 13,526 11,762 12,082 Headquarters 97,088 85,604 85,638 69,443 80,389 Vanderbilt Beach 11,407 10,345 9,278 8,690 10,188 Golden Gate 32,864 26,966 25,289 24,216 28,834 Naples Regional 62,004 50,952 47,770 45,246 39,549 Immokalee 16,109 15,141 13,879 17,727 28,098 Estates 12,606 11,468 9,878 16,226 18,863 Everglades City 0 0 1,187 780 1,345 TOTALS 308,327 270,604 263,332 245,199 273,457 Technology Usage* in Buildings by Library * Technology Usage includes WiFi access, Internet computer usage, and printing. 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 South Regional 27,562 23,808 20,654 24,196 21,317 Marco Island 2,819 3,588 4,538 2,276 3,200 East Naples 1,682 1,464 2,541 1,296 1,053 Headquarters 21,141 19,462 20,309 17,248 21,655 Vanderbilt Beach 1,902 2,438 4,634 3,982 8,109 Golden Gate 4,834 4,366 5,929 4,563 9,622 Naples Regional 12,765 12,200 9,741 10,212 13,323 Immokalee 3,358 3,262 6,567 5,342 15,227 Estates 4,855 4,665 7,326 6,874 8,334 TOTALS 80,918 75,253 82,239 75,989 101,840 Program Attendance is the combined total of adult, young adult, and children's in-person programming. In-Person Program Attendance by Library Page 30 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1703 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) The Library Division also generates a small amount of revenue through the rental of meeting room space to for-profit and non-profit entities. Page 31 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1704 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY – MATERIAL CIRCULATION 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 South Regional 224,310 210,648 166,360 150,988 159,389 Marco Island 161,496 158,138 118,749 115,964 124,573 East Naples 101,055 102,634 82,002 72,968 77,684 Headquarters*666,410 683,788 822,227 833,592 815,419 Vanderbilt Beach 154,508 147,391 112,089 118,191 112,976 Golden Gate 171,812 152,637 122,566 112,931 114,331 Naples Regional 355,559 314,526 193,609 197,417 202,241 Immokalee 58,631 56,810 53,954 47,990 59,022 Estates 127,964 114,232 85,757 78,194 92,130 Everglades City 14,556 12,199 10,005 5,603 8,641 Jail (Naples & Immokalee)23,871 17,289 14,556 9,967 13,044 Electronic Materials 242,121 383,588 402,604 519,121 684,234 TOTALS 2,302,293 2,353,880 2,184,478 2,262,926 2,463,684 Circulation of Materials by Library (including eBooks, Mail-A-Book, and Jails) * Headquarters circulation includes all renewals, interlibrary loans, and Mail-A-Book. - 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Circulation of Materials by Library South Regional Marco Island East Naples Headquarters*Vanderbilt Beach Golden Gate Naples Regional Immokalee Estates Everglades City Jail (Naples & Immokalee)Electronic Materials Page 32 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1705 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES CONTENTS • COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) − SUMMARY • TABLE • CHART • EMS STATIONS − EXISTING, LEASED & PROPOSED INVENTORY − MAP • EMS STATIONS INVENTORY − TABLE • COLLIER EMS COST PER OWNED AND SHARED STATION TABLES, INCLUDING EQUIPMENT REPLACE- MENT COSTS • ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT (ALS) AGREEMENT − MAP • EMS TRAVEL TIMES − CHARTS • EXISTING EMS ZONES − MAP Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 33 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1706 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 34 of 1059.A.3.cPacket Pg. 1707Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 35 of 1059.A.3.cPacket Pg. 1708Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 36 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1709 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 37 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1710 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 38 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1711 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 39 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1712 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 40 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1713 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 41 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1714 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 42 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1715 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 43 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1716 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 44 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1717 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 45 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1718 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 46 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1719 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COUNTY GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS CONTENTS •GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS − SUMMARY •TABLE •CHART •GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS ‒ SUPPLEMENTAL 2017 MASTER SPACE PLAN-BASED PROJECTIONS •TABLE •CHART •GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN •GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS EXISTING INVENTORY − MAP •GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS INVENTORY •GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS LEASED SPACE INVENTORY − MAP •GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS LEASED SPACE INVENTORY Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 47 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1720 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Facility Type: Government Buildings (Category B) Level of Service Standard: 1.7 sq. ft. per capita (peak season population)* Unit Cost:$438 ** Square Feet Value/Cost Available Inventory 9/30/2020 927,620 $406,297,560 Required Inventory 9/30/2025 846,013 $370,553,694 Proposed AUIR FY20/21 - FY24/25 0 $0 5-year Surplus or (Deficit)81,607 $35,743,866 Expenditures Proposed AUIR FY20/21 - FY24/25 $73,671,000 Debt Service Payments $28,065,000 Total Expenditures $101,736,000 Revenues (FY 17-21) Impact Fees $12,961,700 Interest 175,000$ Available Cash for Future Projects/Debt Service 3,878,100$ Loan from General Fund (001) Loan from Countywide Capital Projects (General Fund)11,050,200$ Total Revenues $28,065,000 Revenues Required to maintain existing LOSS $73,671,000 Total Revenues $101,736,000 Recommendation: That the CCPC forward a recommendation of approval to the BCC for the proposed “Government Buildings AUIR for FY20/21 - FY24/25”. Notes: * BCC adopted Level of Service Standard is 1.7sq. ft. per capita. LOSS identified within BCC approved Dec 20th 2011 Impact Fee Study is 1.52 sq. ft. per capita. The 1.7sf per capita only covers owned facilities and does not cover leased facilities which currently meet approximately 5% of the space required(available). ** The unit cost utilized is based upon engineer estimates of probable project costs by square foot (Updated July 2019) 2020 AUIR FACILITY SUMMARY FORM I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR Cat B - Government Buildings\Draft\2020 DRAFT AUIR GOVT BLDGs 20 Percent Peak rev1 (version 3).xlsb 1 of 4Page 48 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1721 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) POPULATION SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET SURPLUS / VALUE ORFISCAL CO-WIDE REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE(DEFICIENCY) (COST) ATYEAR(Peak) 1.7 IN AUIR CIP*$438 2017 434,890 739,313 0 927,620 188,307 82,478,4662018 445,405 757,189 0 927,620 170,431 74,648,7782019 454,676 772,949 0 927,620 154,671 67,745,8982020 463,481 787,918 0 927,620 139,702 61,189,4762021 471,798 802,057 20,000 947,620 145,563 63,756,5942022 480,264 816,449 2,000 949,620 133,171 58,328,8982023 488,882 831,099 64,000 1,013,620 182,521 79,944,1982024 497,655 846,013 71,800 1,085,420 239,407 104,860,2662025 505,706 859,700 15,000 1,100,420 240,720 105,435,36042,224 71,782 172,800 172,800 101,018** 2026 513,010 872,116 0 1,100,420 228,304 99,997,1522027 520,419 884,712 0 1,100,420 215,708 94,480,1042028 527,935 897,490 0 1,100,420 202,930 88,883,3402029 535,560 910,453 0 1,100,420 189,967 83,205,5462030 535,560 910,453 0 1,100,420 189,967 83,205,54629,855 50,753 0 0 -50,75372,079 122,535 172,800 172,800 50,265*** 2031 542,416 922,107 0 1,100,420 178,313 78,101,0942032 548,481 932,418 0 1,100,420 168,002 73,584,8762033 554,614 942,844 0 1,100,420 157,576 69,018,2882034 560,816 953,387 0 1,100,420 147,033 64,400,4542035 567,087 964,048 0 1,100,420 136,372 59,730,93631,527 53,595 0 0 -53,595103,606176,130172,800172,800***Projected Additional Area Shown on AUIR CIP for New Heritage Bay GSC Building Based on 2008 Master Space Plan***Projected Additional Area Shown on AUIR CIP for New BCC Building Based on 2008 Master Space PlanBased on projected service space needs developed from population projections in the Master Space Plan. Population trends are volatile and planned completions may vary in future AUIRs.3rd 5-Year Growth (2030-2034)Total 15-Year Growth (2020-2034)2020 AUIRGovernment BuildingsLOSS: 1.7 sf / capita (Peak Season Population)1st 5-Year Growth (2020-2024)2nd 5-Year Growth (2025-2029)Total 10-Year Growth (2020-2029)I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR Cat B - Government Buildings\Draft\2020 DRAFT AUIR GOVT BLDGs 20 Percent Peak rev1 (version 3).xlsb2 of 4Page 49 of 1059.A.3.cPacket Pg. 1722Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 0200,000400,000600,000800,0001,000,0001,200,0001,400,0001,600,000FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32Square Feet 2020 AUIR Government Buildings( Peak Season Population)SF Required at 1.7 sf / capitaSF AvailableSupervisor of Elections RelocationNew Heritage Bay Govt. Serv.*Government Operations Business Park Buildings (1-3)Ave Maria Public Safety and Gov. Serv. CenterMental Health FacilityMedical Examiner's ExpansionPage 50 of 1059.A.3.cPacket Pg. 1723Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) FundProject Sq. Feet $/ Sq. Ft. CostCompleteSourceTotal FY Actual FY Actual FYProjects Recently CompletedSUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0† Purchased Building and Remodel 0Projects Under Contstruction SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0Projects Approved for ConstructionSUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0Proposed AUIR CIP FY20-24GG Heritage Bay GSC Phase 1 - 7.7 Acres* 20,000 447 8,946,875 2020 894,688 2021 8,052,188 2021GG Medical Examiners Office Expansion 2,000 447 894,688 2021 89,469 2022 805,219 2022GG Mental Health Facility 64,000 391 25,000,000 2021 2,500,000 2022 22,500,000 2023GG GOBP Building 1** 34,200 447 15,299,156 2021 1,529,916 2023 13,769,241 2024GG GOBP Building 2** 7,600 447 3,399,813 2021 339,981 2023 3,059,831 2024GG GOBP Building 3** 30,000 447 13,420,313 2021 1,342,031 2023 12,078,281 2024GGAve Maria Public Safety and Gov.Svcs.*** 15,000 447 6,710,156 2023 671,016 2024 6,039,141 2025SUBTOTAL 172,800 439 73,671,000 7,367,100 66,303,900172,800 73,671,000Planned Projects Beyond FY2024SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 172,800 73,671,000* Heritage Bay GSC. The 2008 Master Plan shows this project in 2020. Unit Cost represents 3%/yr inflation 2016 to 2027** GOBP Project is subject to debt service financing where applicable*** The timing & funding for construction of a permanent Public Safety Facility and a Gov. Svcs. Facility at Ave Maria is To Be Determined (TBD) in the futureGovernment BuildingsCapital Improvement Plan (CIP) for 2020 AUIR(Note: per old Master Plan dated 2008; Master Plan Updated in 2019)Design ConstructionTotal AUIR CIP FY20-24NOTE: Highlighted projects are not funded with Impact FeesI:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR Cat B - Government Buildings\Draft\2020 DRAFT AUIR GOVT BLDGs 20 Percent Peak rev1 (version 3).xlsb4 of 4Page 51 of 1059.A.3.cPacket Pg. 1724Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Name of Structure Address Square Feet CAT Operations (ex-Morande Dealership) 8300 Radio Road 32,144 Transportation Department (Arthrex) ** 2885 Horseshoe Drive South 34,236 Golden Gate Government Service Center 4829 Golden Gate Parkway 7,276 Marco Tax Collector 1040 Winterberry 2,699 Immokalee Courthouse & Gov't Center 106 S. 1st Street 10,495 Immokalee Health Department (CHSI) 419 N. 1st Street 14,778 Immokalee Barn (First Floor) 425 Sgt. Joe Jones Road 7,265 Immokalee Barn (Second Floor) 425 Sgt. Joe Jones Road 7,265 Immokalee Transportation Bldg. ** 550 Stockade Road 8,837 Immokalee Code Enforcement Bldg. 310 Alachua Street 1,994 Medical Examiners Office 3838 Domestic Avenue 13,238 Building "B" Human Resources 3303 E. Tamiami Trail 7,160 Building "C-1" Tax Collector 3291 E. Tamiami Trail 14,745 Building "C-1 Addition" Tax Collector 3291 E. Tamiami Trail 3,407 Building "C-2" Supervisor of Elections 3295 E. Tamiami Trail 10,190 Building "C-2 Addition" Supv. of Elections 3295 E. Tamiami Trail 2,411 Building "D" Risk / Jail Visit / AS Admin 3311 E. Tamiami Trail 8,388 Building "F" Admin. 1st Floor Security Lobby 3299 E. Tamiami Trail 2,138 Building "F" Administration 1st Floor ** 3299 E. Tamiami Trail 10,859 Building "F" Administration 2nd Floor ** 3299 E. Tamiami Trail 10,859 Building "F" Administration 3rd Floor ** 3299 E. Tamiami Trail 10,859 Building "F" Administration 4th Floor ** 3299 E. Tamiami Trail 10,859 Building "F" Administration 5th Floor ** 3299 E. Tamiami Trail 10,859 Building "F" Administration 6th Floor ** 3299 E. Tamiami Trail 10,859 Building "F" Administration 7th Floor ** 3299 E. Tamiami Trail 10,859 Building "F" Administration 8th Floor ** 3299 E. Tamiami Trail 10,859 Building "G" Wellness Center ** 3327 E. Tamiami Trail 5,511 Building "H" Health 1st Floor 3339 E. Tamiami Trail 24,385 Building "H" Health 2nd Floor 3339 E. Tamiami Trail 29,775 Building "L" Courthouse 1st Floor ** 3315 E. Tamiami Trail 24,761 Building "L" Courthouse 2nd Floor ** 3315 E. Tamiami Trail 23,533 Building "L" Courthouse 3rd Floor ** 3315 E. Tamiami Trail 22,021 Building "L" Courthouse 4th Floor 3315 E. Tamiami Trail 22,211 Building "L" Courthouse 5th Floor 3315 E. Tamiami Trail 22,041 Building "L" Courthouse 6th Floor 3315 E. Tamiami Trail 22,041 Building "L" Courthouse Roof Penthouse 3315 E. Tamiami Trail 7,099 Building "L" Courthouse Mezz. ** 3315 E. Tamiami Trail 5,050 Building "W" General Services - 1st Floor 3335 E. Tamiami Trail 21,782 Building "W" General Services - 2nd Floor 3335 E. Tamiami Trail 9,272 New BCC Fleet Management ** 2901 County Barn Road 41,597 Animal Control Admin. 7610 Davis Boulevard 8,933 GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 2020 AUIR Inventory Owned Facilities - Space & Value to be included in 2016 Impact Fee Study G:\Administration\AUIR\AUIR 2020\2020 DRAFT AUIR GOVT BLDGs 20 Percent Peak rev1 (version 2).xlsb 1 of 3Page 52 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1725 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 2020 AUIR Inventory Name of Structure Address Square Feet Animal Crt'l Sally Port 7610 Davis Boulevard 6,727 Golden Gate Supv of Elections Bldg. 3300 Santa Barbara Boulevard 7,000 Agriculture Building 14700 Immokalee Road 13,361 Emergency Services Center 8075 Lely Cultural Parkway 57,274 Building "L-1" Courthouse Annex ** 3315 E. Tamiami Trail 134,780 New Property Appraiser ** 3950 Radio Road 27,591 North Collier Government Services Center ** 2335 Orange Blossom Dr. 13,923 New Supervisor of Elections Facility ** 3750 Enterprise Avenue 31,530 SubTotal Owned Facilities - Space & Value to be included in 2016 Impact Fee Study 857,736 Name of Structure Address Square Feet Building "E" Snack Bar *3307 E. Tamiami Trail 713 GMD Extension *2800 N. Horseshoe Dr 21,935 GMD Main Building */**2800 N. Horseshoe Dr 41,028 Airport Place - Tax Collector * 725 Airport Rd. S 6,208 SubTotal Owned Facilities - Not included in 2016 Impact Fee Study 69,884 SubTotal Owned Facilities - Space included in AUIR 927,620 Name of Structure Address Square Feet 800 MGHZ Generator Bldg. 312 Stockade Road 238 Imm. Animal Control Kennel 402 Stockade Road 1,572 Animal Crt'l Kennel 1 7610 Davis Boulevard 3,949 Animal Crt'l Kennel 2 7610 Davis Boulevard 3,949 Animal Crt'l Kennel 3 7610 Davis Boulevard 3,949 Animal Ctr'l Stable 7610 Davis Boulevard 3,159 Immokalee Radio Tower Shed 312 Stockade Road 16 Road & Bridge Shed 402 Stockade Road 102 Road & Bridge Fuel Island 402 Stockade Road 818 Building "K" Chiller Building 3323 E. Tamiami Trail 5,520 Electric Substation "A" 3315 E. Tamiami Trail 824 Electric Substation "B" 3339 E. Tamiami Trail 1,088 CDES Parking Garage * 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr 101,956 Courthouse Annex Parking Deck** 3355 E. Tamiami Trail 420,497 800 MGHZ Generator 2901 County Barn Road 368 800 MGHZ Repeater Building 2901 County Barn Road 64 Vehicle Wash Rack 2901 County Barn Road 1,950 Fuel Island/Canopy 2897 County Barn Road 3,600 Fuel Tanks & Slab 2897 County Barn Road 1,557 Generator / Fuel Tank 2897 County Barn Road 127 555,303 AUIR & Impact Fee Study - TOTAL Owned Facilities 1,482,923 Owned Facilities - Space & Value to be included in 2016 Impact Fee Study - continued Owned Facilities - Not included in 2016 Impact Fee Study Owned Ancillary Facilities - Value to be included in 2016 Impact Fee Study SubTotal Owned Ancillary Facilities - Value to be included in 2016 Impact Fee Study G:\Administration\AUIR\AUIR 2020\2020 DRAFT AUIR GOVT BLDGs 20 Percent Peak rev1 (version 2).xlsb 2 of 3Page 53 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1726 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 2020 AUIR Inventory Name of Structure Address Square Feet Tax Collector's Office - Greentree 2348 Immokalee Rd. 7,600 Transp. Dept - Davis Boulevard Maintenance Facility Davis Blvd. (former FDOT) 11,208 GG City WIC Office 4945 Golden Gate Parkway 2,100 Tax Collector's Office - Eagle Creek 12668 E. Tamiami Trail 3,087 Tourism and Economic Development 2660 Horseshoe Drive, North 4,840 Horseshoe Square - Growth Management Department 2685 Horseshoe Drive South 7,203 Tax Collector's Office - Golden Gate Estates 50 South Wilson Boulevard 2,777 Human Resources - Health Dept. - Court Plaza III 2671 Airport Road South, Unit 202 2,500 Sub Total Leased Facilities 41,315 TOTAL Owned & Leased Facilities 1,524,238 The General Government Buildings Inventory includes those facilities not otherwise covered by an impact or user fee. * Removed from inventory per Impact Fee consultant's recommendation ** Square Footage has been updated LEASED FACILITIES (Subject to AUIR) G:\Administration\AUIR\AUIR 2020\2020 DRAFT AUIR GOVT BLDGs 20 Percent Peak rev1 (version 2).xlsb 3 of 3Page 54 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1727 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 9 9 9 99 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 99 9 99 SR 82 CR 833CR 846 IMMOKALEE RD TAMIAMI TRAIL OIL WELL RD LOOP RD.CR 858C R 8 6 9 CORKSCREW RD CR 951EVERGLADES BLVDESTERO BLVDSUMMERLIN RDGOLD EN GATE BLVD DAVIS BLVD CR 29ALICO RD RADIO RD PINE RIDGE RD DANIALS PKWY VANDERBILT BEACH BO NITA BEACH RDDEL PADRO PKWYSANTA BARBARA BL SR 29 US 41 TAMIAMI TRAIL G O L D E N G AT E P K W YAIRPORT RDRATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RDGOODLETTE RDTAMIAMI TRAILLIVINGSTON RDSR 82 IMMOKALEE RD LAKETRAFFORD LAKE TRAFFORD RD 2 0 2 0 G O V E R N M E N T B U I L D I N G S - E X I S T I N G I N V E N T O R Y2020 G O V E R N M E N T B U I L D I N G S - E X I S T I N G I N V E N T O R Y GULFOFMEXI CO§¨¦75 §¨¦75 §¨¦75 §¨¦75 £¤41 !(29 !(29 !(951 !(951 !(92 GIS MAPPING : BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTLEE COUNTY 9 Florida G ulfCoast University Government Center Complex(Building B, C, D, E, F, G, H, K, L, Wand CAT Transfer Station) Grow th Managem ent Building Transpor tation Airport Tax Collector GG Governm ent Services Center Animal Control Admin. Medical Exam iner's office Marco Tax Collector Im mokalee Barn Im mokalee Anim al Control Im mokalee Governm ent Center North Collier Government Services Center A v e M a r i a T o w n A v e M a r i a T o w n a n d U n i v e r s i t yand U n i v e r s i t y HENDRY COUNTY Legend Existing Government Buildings Major Roads $+41 $+41 $+41 Em ergency Services Center BCC Fleet Maintenance,Fuel Station and W ash Rack Courthouse Annex CAT Operations Property Appraiser Office Agricultural Building 9 Supervisor of Elections Im mokalee Code Enforcement . 0 3 6 9 121.5 Miles NAPL ES MARCO ISLAND IMMOK ALEE EVERGLADES CITYPage 55 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1728 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) l l l lll l l SR 82 CR 833CR 846 IMMOKALEE RD TAMIAMI TRAIL OIL WELL RD LOOP RD.CR 858C R 8 6 9 CORKSCREW RD CR 951EVERGLADES BLVDESTERO BLVDSUMMERLIN RDGOLD EN GATE BLVD DAVIS BLVD CR 29ALICO RD RADIO RD PINE RIDGE RD DANIALS PKWY VANDERBILT BEACH BO NITA BEAC H RDDEL PADRO PKWYSANTA BARBARA BL SR 29 US 41 TAMIAMI TRAIL G O L D E N G AT E P K W YAIRPORT RDRATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RDGOODLETTE RDTAMIAMI TRAILLIVINGSTON RDSR 82 IMMOKALEE RD LAKETRAFFORD LAKE TRAFFORD RD 2 0 2 0 G O V E R N M E N T B U I L D I N G S - L E A S E D S P A C E I N V E N T O R Y2020 G O V E R N M E N T B U I L D I N G S - L E A S E D S P A C E I N V E N T O R Y GULFOFMEXI CO§¨¦75 §¨¦75 §¨¦75 §¨¦75 £¤41 !(29 !(29 !(951 !(951 !(92 !(29 !(82 . 0 3 6 9 121.5 Miles GIS MAPPING : BETH YANG, AICP GRO WTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTLEE COUNTY 9 Florida G ulfCoast University A v e M a r i a T o w n A v e M a r i a T o w n a n d U n i v e r s i t yand U n i v e r s i t y HENDRY COUNTY Legend l Leased Government Buildings Major Roads $+41 $+41 $+41 FDOT Office Green tree Tax Collecto r's Office Eagle Creek Tax Collector's Office GG City WIC Office Tourism and EconomicDevelopment Office Horsesho e Square - GMD Tax Collector's Office HR - Health Dept: Court Plaza III NAPL ES MARCO ISLAND EVERGLADES CITY IMMOK ALEE Page 56 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1729 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT ON PUBLIC FACILITIES 2020 CATEGORY “C” FACILITIES 1. County Coastal Zone Areas Management ‒ Beaches − Inlets Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 57 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1730 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT Area Type: Coastal Zone (Category "C") Using the adopted Beaches and Waterways Master Plan, and the Standards established for Sustainability (see Attachment "A"--Coastal Zones), the following is set forth for FY 2020/21 to FY 2024/25. Expenditures Project & Program Costs $82,629,500 Reserves - Unrestricted $15,705,000 Reserve - Catastrophe (1)$10,000,000 SUB TOTAL $108,334,500 Revenues TDC Revenue - Category A $54,815,000 Interest & Misc. Sources $7,268,500 Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $46,763,000 Revenue Reserve ($512,000) TOTAL $108,334,500 Surplus or (Deficit) Revenues for 5-year Capital Program $0 Revenue needed to maintain Sustainability $0 Recommendation: That the BCC approve the proposed Coastal Zone Management AUIR for FY 2020/21--FY 2024/25. Notes: (1) Catastrophe funds are accumulated at a rate of $500,000/yr, up to a maximum of $10,000,000. 2020 AUIR FACILITY SUMMARY Page 58 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1731 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) TDC Beach Renourishment Capital Fund (195) 2020 AUIR Description FY 2021 Adopted FY 2022 Proforma FY 2023 Proforma FY 2024 Proforma FY 2025 Proforma 5 Year FY 21 - FY 25 Expenditures Project & Program Costs 5,742,100 12,403,400 11,960,700 6,608,000 45,915,300 82,629,500 Reserves - Unrestricted 42,173,000 42,129,600 44,754,500 49,585,400 15,705,000 15,705,000 Reserve for Catastrophe (1)8,570,000 9,070,000 9,570,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 Total Expenditures/Uses 56,485,100 63,603,000 66,285,200 66,193,400 71,620,300 108,334,500 Revenue TDC Taxes 9,734,100 11,102,600 11,213,600 11,325,700 11,439,000 54,815,000 Interest & Misc.500,000 1,757,400 3,872,000 543,200 595,900 7,268,500 Carry Forward 46,763,000 50,743,000 51,199,600 54,324,500 59,585,400 46,763,000 Revenue Reserve (512,000) - - - - (512,000) Total Revenue/Sources 56,485,100 63,603,000 66,285,200 66,193,400 71,620,300 108,334,500 Notes: (1) Catastrophe Reserves are accumulated at a rate of $ 500,000 per year up to a maximum of $ 10 million.Page 59 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1732 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) TDC Beach Renourishment Capital Fund (195)7,875,602 2021CZM 10 Year Projection Proposed Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected FY21 - FY25 FY21 - FY30 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 5 Year Totals 10 Year Totals Sources Roll forward (sum of reserves)46,763,000 50,743,000 51,199,600 54,324,500 59,585,400 25,705,000 32,202,900 (6,226,200) (1,150,300) 5,386,900 46,763,000 46,763,000 Carry Forward to Fund Project Roll - - - - - - TDT (Fund 195) Revenue 9,734,100 11,102,600 11,213,600 11,325,700 11,439,000 11,553,400 11,668,900 11,785,600 11,903,500 12,022,500 54,815,000 113,748,900 Revenue Reserve (512,000) - - - - - - - - - (512,000) (512,000) Reimbursements/Miscellaneous Revenue 1,250,000 - - - - - - 1,250,000 1,250,000 FEMA/FDEP Reimbursements - 3,360,000 3,360,000 3,360,000 Interest 500,000 507,400 512,000 543,200 595,900 257,100 322,000 (62,300) (11,500) 53,900 2,658,500 3,217,700 Total Funding 56,485,100 63,603,000 66,285,200 66,193,400 71,620,300 37,515,500 44,193,800 5,497,100 10,741,700 17,463,300 108,334,500 167,827,600 Uses FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 5 Year Totals 10 Year Totals Proj. No. Beach Projects - - - - - - - - - - - - Proj. No. Collier Beach Renourishment - - 80301 Collier Beach Renourishment - - - - - - - - - - - - 90068 Naples Beach Engineering, NTP & Renourishment 2,000,000 3,000,000 - - - - 5,000,000 - - - 5,000,000 10,000,000 90067 Park Shore Beach Engineering, NTP & Renourishment - - - 2,500,000 - - - - 2,500,000 2,500,000 5,000,000 90066 Vanderbilt Beach Engineering, NTP & Renourishment 5,000,000 - - - 5,000,000 - - - 5,000,000 10,000,000 90069 Clam Pass Beach Engineering, NTP & Renourishment - - 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 90070 Pelican Bay Beach Engineering, NTP & Renourishment 1,250,000 - - - - - - - 1,250,000 1,250,000 90062 Marco Central Bch Regrade - - - - - - - - - - - 90071 Marco Island South, NTP & Renourishment - - - 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 90074 North Park Shore Beach NTP & Renourishment (project coord w/Park Shore)- - 80165 County Beach Analysis & Design - - - - - - - - - - - 90065 Local Government Funding Request (LGFR)25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 250,000 - - 80366 Beach Resiliency 50,000 35,000,000 35,000,000 50,000 35,050,000 70,100,000 USACE Feasibility Study Technical Support 150,000 150,000 150,000 Cost Share participation - 35% for BASE design/permitting/construction ($25M)9,000,000 9,000,000 9,000,000 Collier Perferred Scope over USACE Recommended (base/storm surge) Plan - - Cost Share Resiliency Structural Solutions - Study, Modeling, Peer Review 500,000 500,000 500,000 Cost ShareResiliency Structural Solutions -Permitting, Engineering , Design 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 450,000 900,000 Cost Share Resiliency Structiral Solutions - Construction 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 5,000,000 15,000,000 - - Proj No. Inlet Projects - - 80288 Wiggins Pass Dredging 25,000 150,000 25,000 850,000 25,000 150,000 25,000 850,000 25,000 150,000 1,075,000 2,275,000 90549 Doctor's Pass Dredging 600,000 600,000 600,000 1,200,000 88032 Clam Pass Dredging (Pel Bay)20,000 250,000 20,000 250,000 20,000 250,000 20,000 250,000 20,000 540,000 1,100,000 90072 Collier Creek Modeling, Jetty Rework and Channel Training 1,100,000 - - - - - - - - 1,100,000 1,100,000 - - Proj No. Regulatory - - 80171 Beach Tilling - County Wide 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 300,000 90033 Near Shore Hard Bottom Monitoring 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 925,000 1,850,000 90297 Shorebird Monitoring 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 250,000 90536 City/County Physical Beach and Pass Monitor 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 850,000 1,745,000 99999 Transfer to Fund 119 Beach Turtle Monitoring 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 850,000 1,745,000 - - Proj No. Maintenance - - 80378 Tractor Shelter - - 90527 Beach Cleaning-Naples 197,000 197,000 197,000 197,000 197,000 197,000 197,000 197,000 197,000 197,000 985,000 1,970,000 90533 Beach Cleaning-County/Marco 354,200 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,154,200 2,154,200 80407 Jolly Bridge Maintenance 20,000 20,000 20,000 - - Proj No. Structures - - 90096 Naples Pier 135,600 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 935,600 1,935,600 - - Proj No. Administration - - 90020 Fund 195 Admin Costs 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 750,000 Total Direct Project Cost 4,661,800 11,197,000 10,752,000 5,397,000 44,702,000 4,097,000 49,202,000 5,427,000 4,132,000 6,977,000 76,709,800 146,544,800 99195 Interest Redirection - - - - - - - - - - - - 99195 Transfer to 185 Operating 846,000 978,800 978,800 978,800 978,800 978,800 978,800 978,800 978,800 978,800 4,761,200 9,655,200 99195 Transfer to Tax Collecter (Revenue Collection Exp)234,300 227,600 229,900 232,200 234,500 236,800 239,200 241,600 244,000 246,500 1,158,500 2,366,600 99195 Reserves General - - - - - - - - - - - - 99195 Reserve for Catastrophe (increase by 500K/yr up to 10M in reserves)8,570,000 9,070,000 9,570,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 99195 Reserve for Unrestricted Capital - - 99195 Reserve - FDEP/FEMA Refuding/Deob - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Programmed 14,312,100 21,473,400 21,530,700 16,608,000 55,915,300 15,312,600 60,420,000 16,647,400 15,354,800 18,202,300 92,629,500 168,566,600 Unencumbered Reserve Balance to Roll 42,173,000 42,129,600 44,754,500 49,585,400 15,705,000 22,202,900 (16,226,200) (11,150,300) (4,613,100) (739,000) 15,705,000 (739,000) G:\FISCAL\AUIR\FY 20\Coastal\CZM FY20 2020-07-01 AUIRPage 60 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1733 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) APPENDIX I CONTENTS: • COUNTYWIDE PERMANENT POPULATION ESTIMATES AND PRO- JECTIONS (APRIL 1 & OCTOBER 1) • COUNTY PERMANENT POPULATION ESTIMATES AND PROJEC- TIONS BY PLANNING COMMUNITY (APRIL 1 & OCTOBER 1) • COUNTYWIDE PEAK SEASON POPULATION ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS • COUNTY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICTS POPULATION ESTI- MATES AND PROJECTIONS − FULL DISTRICTS & AREAS SERVED • MAPS − COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMUNITIES DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDENTIAL CO’s BY PLANNING COMMUNITY DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDENTIAL CO’s 2005 - 2020 ‒ SUMMARY POPULATION DISTRIBUTION BY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE (TAZ) DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDENTIAL CO’s ‒ 2019-2020 • TABLES − IMPACT FEE FUND AND DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE Collier County 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 61 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1734 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Countywide COLLIER COUNTY PERMANENT POPULATION ESTIMATES and PROJECTIONS -- COUNTYWIDE October 1st 2000 & 2010 - 2044 FISCAL YEAR estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 COUNTYWIDE 257,926 322,653 326,817 331,756 335,223 340,293 347,002 353,836 362,409 372,027 380,653 388,128 395,249 402,501 409,885 417,406 424,165 430,137 projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 COUNTYWIDE 436,194 442,335 448,564 454,194 459,210 464,282 469,409 474,594 479,283 483,468 487,689 491,947 496,243 500,272 504,029 507,815 511,629 515,472 COLLIER COUNTY PERMANENT POPULATION ESTIMATES and PROJECTIONS -- COUNTYWIDE April 1st 2000 & 2010 - 2045 CENSUS YEAR (Decennial) estimate estimate estimate estimate estimate estimate estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 COUNTYWIDE 251,377 321,520 323,785 329,849 333,663 336,783 343,802 350,202 357,470 367,347 376,706 384,600 391,656 398,842 406,160 413,611 421,200 427,130 433,144 projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection projection 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 COUNTYWIDE 439,243 445,428 451,700 456,689 461,732 466,832 471,987 477,200 481,366 485,569 489,809 494,085 498,400 502,143 505,915 509,715 513,543 517,400 notes: 1) Estimates and projections are derived from data obtained from: 2000 Census and 2010 Census; Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) population bulletins; Collier County Comprehensive Planning staff; and, Planning staff from Naples and Marco Island. 2) Based upon BEBR Medium Range growth rate projections. Prepared by Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section June 9, 2020. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR Appendix I - Population, Countywide\2020 pop est. & proj. FNL_PRINT by-dw/6-2019Page 62 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1735 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Peak Season COLLIER COUNTY PEAK SEASON POPULATION ESTIMATES and PROJECTIONS 2000 & 2010 - 2044 estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Unincorporated Area 265,366 343,593 348,497 354,268 358,404 364,414 372,134 379,740 389,578 400,505 410,116 418,625 426,709 434,950 443,351 451,914 459,543 466,207 COUNTYWIDE 309,511 387,183 392,180 398,107 402,268 408,351 416,402 424,603 434,890 446,432 456,784 465,754 474,299 483,001 491,863 500,887 508,998 516,165 projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 Unincorporated Area 472,970 479,837 486,807 493,031 498,489 504,013 509,604 515,263 520,334 524,805 529,319 533,877 538,480 543,037 547,542 552,080 556,653 561,259 COUNTYWIDE 523,433 530,803 538,277 545,033 551,052 557,138 563,291 569,512 575,140 580,161 585,227 590,336 595,491 600,326 604,835 609,378 613,955 618,566 notes: 1)Estimates and projections are derived from data obtained from: 2000 Census and 2010 Census; Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) population bulletins; Collier County Comprehensive Planning staff; and, Planning staff from Naples and Marco Island. 2)Peak Season population is derived by increasing each year's October 1 permanent population by 20% (.20). 3)Based upon BEBR Medium Range growth rate projections. Prepared by Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section June 9, 2020. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR Appendix I - Population, Countywide\2020 pop est. & proj. FNL_PRINT by-dw/6-2019Page 63 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1736 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Water & Sewer COLLIER COUNTY WATER DISTRICTS POPULATION ESTIMATES and PROJECTIONS October 1 Permanent & Peak Season 2014 - 2039 estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections COUNTY WATER 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 Permanent Population (Oct.1)201,478 206,148 210,870 215,447 221,333 227,464 232,129 236,560 241,077 245,682 250,376 254,558 258,211 261,918 265,682 269,503 272,914 275,906 278,934 281,999 285,101 287,881 290,331 292,806 295,304 297,828 Peak Season Population 241,774 247,377 253,044 258,537 265,600 272,957 278,554 283,872 289,293 294,819 300,452 305,470 309,853 314,302 318,818 323,403 327,497 331,087 334,721 338,399 342,121 345,457 348,398 351,367 354,365 357,393 NORTHEAST WATER 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 Permanent Population (Oct.1)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Peak Season Population - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COLLIER COUNTY SEWER DISTRICTS POPULATION ESTIMATES and PROJECTIONS October 1 Permanent & Peak Season 2014 - 2039 estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections NORTH SEWER 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 Permanent Population (Oct.1)109,886 112,505 115,436 118,154 121,160 123,797 125,302 126,732 128,189 129,675 131,189 132,538 133,716 134,912 136,127 137,359 138,460 139,425 140,402 141,391 142,391 143,288 144,079 144,877 145,683 146,497 Peak Season Population 131,863 135,006 138,523 141,785 145,393 148,557 150,363 152,078 153,827 155,610 157,427 159,046 160,460 161,895 163,352 164,831 166,152 167,310 168,482 169,669 170,870 171,946 172,894 173,852 174,819 175,796 estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections SOUTH SEWER 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 Permanent Population (Oct.1)93,735 96,338 98,180 100,021 102,807 105,942 108,492 110,914 113,384 115,901 118,467 120,753 122,750 124,777 126,834 128,923 130,788 132,423 134,078 135,754 137,450 138,969 140,309 141,661 143,027 144,407 Peak Season Population 112,482 115,605 117,816 120,025 123,368 127,130 130,190 133,097 136,060 139,081 142,160 144,904 147,300 149,732 152,201 154,707 156,945 158,908 160,894 162,905 164,940 166,763 168,371 169,994 171,633 173,288 estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections NORTHEAST SEWER 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 Permanent Population (Oct.1)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Peak Season Population - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections ORANGETREE SEWER 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 Permanent Population (Oct.1)4,968 4,682 4,735 4,826 5,056 5,439 5,802 6,146 6,498 6,856 7,221 7,546 7,830 8,119 8,412 8,709 8,974 9,207 9,443 9,681 9,922 10,139 10,329 10,522 10,716 10,912 Peak Season Population 5,962 5,618 5,681 5,791 6,067 6,526 6,962 7,376 7,797 8,227 8,665 9,056 9,397 9,743 10,094 10,451 10,769 11,048 11,331 11,617 11,907 12,166 12,395 12,626 12,859 13,095 notes: 1)Estimates and projections are derived from data obtained/derived from: 2000 Census & 2010 Census; Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) population bulletins; Collier County Comprehensive Planning staff; and, Planning staff from Naples and Marco Island. 2)Peak Season population is derived by increasing each year's October 1 permanent population by 20% (.20). 3)Based upon BEBR Medium Range growth rate projections. Prepared by Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section June 9, 2020. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR Appendix I - Population, Countywide\2020 pop est. & proj. FNL_PRINT by-dw/6-2019Page 64 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1737 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Planning Community April COLLIER COUNTY PERMANENT POPULATION ESTIMATES and PROJECTIONS April 1st 2000 & 2010 - 2035 By Planning Community and City estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections Planning Community 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 NN - North Naples 47,657 55,041 55,169 55,716 56,152 56,362 56,760 57,344 58,084 58,703 59,208 59,465 59,694 59,927 60,164 60,407 60,653 60,842 61,034 61,229 61,426 61,627 61,782 61,938 62,097 62,258 62,420 SN - South Naples 21,610 28,689 29,029 29,950 30,587 31,071 33,004 33,631 34,052 34,555 35,209 35,445 35,653 35,866 36,083 36,304 36,530 36,702 36,877 37,055 37,236 37,419 37,560 37,703 37,848 37,995 38,144 CN - Central Naples 18,323 18,845 18,867 18,967 19,022 19,096 19,195 19,310 19,535 19,626 19,642 19,690 19,733 19,776 19,821 19,866 19,912 19,947 19,983 20,020 20,056 20,094 20,123 20,152 20,182 20,212 20,242 EN - East Naples 24,385 22,320 22,323 22,358 22,382 22,399 22,682 22,954 23,197 23,526 23,872 25,093 26,178 27,284 28,411 29,561 30,732 31,628 32,538 33,461 34,399 35,351 36,086 36,830 37,583 38,345 39,117 GG - Golden Gate 35,325 44,925 45,000 45,283 45,418 45,490 45,506 45,539 45,575 45,674 46,030 46,273 46,489 46,709 46,933 47,161 47,394 47,572 47,753 47,936 48,123 48,312 48,458 48,606 48,755 48,907 49,060 UE - Urban Estates 16,713 38,658 38,830 39,484 40,084 40,876 42,313 43,804 45,134 46,740 48,276 49,302 50,214 51,143 52,090 53,055 54,040 54,792 55,557 56,333 57,120 57,920 58,537 59,162 59,795 60,435 61,083 RE - Rural Estates 18,815 34,739 34,780 34,941 35,089 35,193 35,481 36,025 37,348 39,784 42,312 44,609 46,649 48,729 50,849 53,011 55,214 56,899 58,610 60,347 62,110 63,900 65,282 66,681 68,098 69,531 70,982 M - Marco 1,350 1,219 1,222 1,224 1,227 1,299 1,340 1,612 1,938 2,175 2,280 2,390 2,487 2,586 2,687 2,790 2,895 2,976 3,057 3,140 3,224 3,309 3,375 3,442 3,510 3,578 3,647 RF - Royal Fakapalm 7,811 11,797 12,205 13,129 13,859 14,392 15,326 16,156 16,855 18,591 19,901 20,853 21,699 22,561 23,440 24,336 25,249 25,948 26,657 27,377 28,107 28,849 29,422 30,002 30,589 31,184 31,785 C - Corkscrew 1,019 4,550 5,375 7,369 8,239 8,989 10,369 11,486 12,675 14,414 15,319 16,209 17,001 17,807 18,629 19,468 20,322 20,976 21,639 22,312 22,996 23,690 24,226 24,769 25,318 25,874 26,437 I - Immokalee 21,845 24,154 24,453 24,685 24,805 24,832 24,905 25,003 25,163 25,471 25,716 25,947 26,152 26,361 26,574 26,792 27,013 27,183 27,355 27,529 27,706 27,886 28,025 28,166 28,308 28,452 28,598 BC - Big Cypress 190 233 233 237 239 240 241 241 242 244 245 245 246 247 247 248 249 249 250 250 251 251 252 252 252 253 253 Unincorporated SUM 215,043 285,170 287,485 293,343 297,103 300,237 307,120 313,104 319,796 329,501 338,008 345,518 352,190 358,992 365,925 372,993 380,198 385,708 391,303 396,982 402,746 408,599 413,119 417,695 422,326 427,014 431,758 estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections Cities 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Everglades City 479 400 406 401 409 409 427 432 443 408 428 431 434 438 441 444 448 451 454 458 461 465 468 472 475 479 482 Marco Island 14,879 16,413 16,443 16,521 16,556 16,607 16,728 16,930 17,036 17,094 17,348 17,404 17,459 17,515 17,571 17,626 17,682 17,773 17,864 17,956 18,047 18,138 18,277 18,417 18,556 18,696 18,835 Naples 20,976 19,537 19,451 19,584 19,595 19,530 19,527 19,736 20,195 20,344 20,922 21,247 21,572 21,897 22,223 22,548 22,873 23,198 23,523 23,848 24,173 24,499 24,824 25,149 25,474 25,799 26,124 Incorporated SUM 36,334 36,350 36,300 36,506 36,560 36,546 36,682 37,098 37,674 37,846 38,698 39,082 39,466 39,850 40,234 40,618 41,002 41,422 41,842 42,262 42,681 43,101 43,569 44,037 44,505 44,974 45,442 COUNTYWIDE TOTAL 251,377 321,520 323,785 329,849 333,663 336,783 343,802 350,202 357,470 367,347 376,706 384,600 391,656 398,842 406,160 413,611 421,200 427,130 433,144 439,243 445,428 451,700 456,689 461,732 466,832 471,987 477,200 notes: 1) 2000 and 2010 Naples, Marco Island, Everglades City, Unincorporated County and County-wide totals are estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 and Census 2010 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171). 2) 2000 and 2010 Planning Community estimates are based upon County Planning staff review of 2000 and 2010 Census maps and population data. 3) Marco Island projections were provided by the city's Planning staff in 2017, in 5-year increments. In-between years are projections prepared by County Planning staff. 4) Naples projections were prepared by County staff based upon 2030 projection provided by the city's Planning staff in 2004. 5) Everglades City projections were prepared by County Planning staff. 6) 2020 - 2035 County-wide totals are projections based upon BEBR Medium Range growth rates between 2020-2025, 2025-2030, and 2030-2035, per BEBR Bulletin #186, January 2020. 7) Planning Community projections were prepared by County Planning staff using Certificate of Occupancy data & persons per dwelling unit ratios derived from 2000 Census. 8) Planning Community projections do not reflect projected buildout population figures, as prepared in 1994 and 2005. 9) Some of the Totals may not equal the sum of the individual figures due to rounding. Prepared by Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section June 9, 2020. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR Appendix I - Population, Countywide\2020 pop est. & proj. FNL_PRINT by-dw/6-2019Page 65 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1738 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Planning Community October COLLIER COUNTY PERMANENT POPULATION ESTIMATES and PROJECTIONS October 1st 2000 & 2010 - 2034 By Planning Community and City estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections Planning Community 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 NN - North Naples 48,857 55,105 55,442 55,934 56,257 56,561 57,052 57,714 58,393 58,956 59,336 59,579 59,810 60,046 60,285 60,530 60,748 60,938 61,131 61,327 61,526 61,704 61,860 62,018 62,177 62,339 SN - South Naples 22,020 28,859 29,490 30,269 30,829 32,037 33,318 33,842 34,304 34,882 35,327 35,549 35,760 35,975 36,194 36,417 36,616 36,790 36,966 37,145 37,327 37,489 37,632 37,776 37,922 38,069 CN - Central Naples 18,604 18,856 18,917 18,994 19,059 19,146 19,253 19,422 19,580 19,634 19,666 19,711 19,754 19,798 19,843 19,889 19,930 19,965 20,001 20,038 20,075 20,108 20,138 20,167 20,197 20,227 EN - East Naples 24,472 22,322 22,340 22,370 22,390 22,540 22,818 23,076 23,361 23,699 24,482 25,635 26,731 27,848 28,986 30,146 31,180 32,083 33,000 33,930 34,875 35,718 36,458 37,206 37,964 38,731 GG - Golden Gate 36,590 44,963 45,142 45,351 45,454 45,498 45,523 45,557 45,624 45,852 46,152 46,381 46,599 46,821 47,047 47,278 47,483 47,662 47,845 48,030 48,217 48,385 48,532 48,681 48,831 48,984 UE - Urban Estates 17,854 38,744 39,157 39,784 40,480 41,594 43,058 44,469 45,937 47,508 48,789 49,758 50,678 51,616 52,573 53,548 54,416 55,175 55,945 56,726 57,520 58,228 58,850 59,478 60,115 60,759 RE - Rural Estates 19,917 34,760 34,861 35,015 35,141 35,337 35,753 36,686 38,566 41,048 43,460 45,629 47,689 49,789 51,930 54,112 56,057 57,755 59,478 61,228 63,005 64,591 65,982 67,389 68,814 70,257 M - Marco 1,358 1,221 1,223 1,226 1,263 1,319 1,476 1,775 2,057 2,228 2,335 2,438 2,536 2,637 2,739 2,843 2,935 3,016 3,099 3,182 3,267 3,342 3,409 3,476 3,544 3,612 RF - Royal Fakapalm 8,127 12,001 12,667 13,494 14,126 14,859 15,741 16,505 17,723 19,246 20,377 21,276 22,130 23,000 23,888 24,792 25,598 26,302 27,017 27,742 28,478 29,136 29,712 30,296 30,887 31,484 C - Corkscrew 1,114 4,962 6,372 7,804 8,614 9,679 10,927 12,080 13,545 14,866 15,764 16,605 17,404 18,218 19,048 19,895 20,649 21,307 21,976 22,654 23,343 23,958 24,498 25,043 25,596 26,155 I - Immokalee 22,032 24,303 24,569 24,745 24,819 24,868 24,954 25,083 25,317 25,593 25,832 26,050 26,257 26,468 26,683 26,902 27,098 27,269 27,442 27,618 27,796 27,956 28,095 28,237 28,380 28,525 BC - Big Cypress 194 233 235 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 246 247 248 248 249 249 250 250 251 251 252 252 253 253 Unincorporated SUM 221,139 286,328 290,414 295,223 298,670 303,679 310,112 316,450 324,649 333,755 341,763 348,854 355,591 362,459 369,459 376,595 382,953 388,505 394,142 399,864 405,673 410,859 415,407 420,011 424,670 429,386 estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates estimates projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections projections Cities 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Everglades City 484 403 404 405 409 418 430 438 426 418 430 433 436 439 443 446 449 453 456 459 463 466 470 473 477 481 Marco Island 14,973 16,428 16,482 16,539 16,582 16,668 16,829 16,983 17,065 17,221 17,376 17,432 17,487 17,543 17,599 17,654 17,728 17,819 17,910 18,001 18,092 18,208 18,347 18,487 18,626 18,765 Naples 21,332 19,494 19,518 19,590 19,563 19,529 19,632 19,966 20,270 20,633 21,085 21,410 21,735 22,060 22,385 22,710 23,035 23,361 23,686 24,011 24,336 24,661 24,986 25,311 25,637 25,962 Incorporated SUM 36,788 36,325 36,403 36,533 36,553 36,614 36,890 37,386 37,760 38,272 38,890 39,274 39,658 40,042 40,426 40,810 41,212 41,632 42,052 42,472 42,891 43,335 43,803 44,271 44,739 45,208 COUNTYWIDE TOTAL 257,926 322,653 326,817 331,756 335,223 340,293 347,002 353,836 362,409 372,027 380,653 388,128 395,249 402,501 409,885 417,406 424,165 430,137 436,194 442,335 448,564 454,194 459,210 464,282 469,409 474,594 notes: 1) These estimates and projections are based upon the spreadsheet of permanent population prepared for April 1, 2000 and 2010-2030. 2) Estimates and projections are derived from data obtained from: 2000 Census and 2010 Census; Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) population bulletins; Collier County Comprehensive Planning staff; and, Planning staff from Naples and Marco Island. 3) Some of the Totals may not equal the sum of the individual figures due to rounding. Prepared by Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section June 9, 2020. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR Appendix I - Population, Countywide\2020 pop est. & proj. FNL_PRINT by-dw/6-2019Page 66 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1739 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !.!.!.!.!.!. !. !. !.!.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !.!. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!.!. !.!. !. !.!.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !.!.!.!.!.!. !. !.!.!.!. !. !.!.!.!.!. !. !.!. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !. !.!.!.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !.!.!.!.!.!.!. !. !.!.!.!. !.!. !. !. !.!.!. !. !.!.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !.!.!. !.!.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !. !.!. !.!. !. !.!.!. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !.!.!.!. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !.!.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !.!. !.!. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!.!. !. !.!.!.!.!. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !.!. !. !. !.!.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !.!.!. !. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !.!.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !.!.!.!.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !.!.!.!.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!.!. !. !.!. !.!. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !.!.!.!.!. !. !.!.!. !. !.!.!.!.!. !.!.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!.!.!. !.!. !. !.!.!.!.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !.!.!.!.!.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !.!. !.!. !.!.!.!.!. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!.!.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !.!. !. !.!.!.!. !. !.!.!.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!.!.!.!. !.!.!. !.!. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!.!.!. !.!.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !.!. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!.!. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !.!.!.!. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !.!.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !.!.!. !. !.!. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!.!. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !.!.!.!.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!.!.!. !.!. !.!.!.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !.!.!. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!.!. !.!.!. !. !.!. !. !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !.!.!. !. !.!. !.!.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !.!.!.!. !.!.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!.!. !.!. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !.!. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !.!. !.!. !. !.!.!.!.!.!. !.!. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!.!. !. !. !.!. !.!. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!.!.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !.!. !.!.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !.!.!.!. !.!.!. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. !.!. !.!.!.!. !.!.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !.!.!.!.!.!.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!.!.!. !.!. !.!.!.!.!. !. !.!.!. !. !.!.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !. !.!.!.!.!. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!.!.!.!. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !.!. !.!.!. !.!.!.!. !.!.!.!.!. !. !. !.!.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !.!.!. !.!. !. !.!.!.!.!. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !. !. !. !. !.!.!.!.!.!. !.!.!.!.!.!.!. !.!.!.!.!. !.!.!. !. !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !. !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !.!.!.!. !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !.!.!. !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !.!.!.!. !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !.!.!.!.!.!. !. I 75 SR 29US 41 CR 846 SR 92EVERGLADES BLVDCR 858CR 850IMMOKALEE RD E SR 82 LIVINGSTON RD SR 951SR 29 NIMMOKALEE RDGREEN BLVDVANDERBILT DRRADIO RDI 75US 41 2 0 2 0 R E S I D E N T I A L D W E L L I N G C E R T I F I C A T E O F O C C U P A N C Y F O R U N I N C O R P O R A T E D C O L L I E R C O U N T Y 2 0 2 0 R E S I D E N T I A L D W E L L I N G C E R T I F I C A T E O F O C C U P A N C Y F O R U N I N C O R P O R A T E D C O L L I E R C O U N T Y T o t a l R e s i d e n t i a l B u i l d i n g P e r m i t C . O : 3 , 2 9 8 T o t a l R e s i d e n t i a l B u i l d i n g P e r m i t C . O : 3 , 2 9 8 T o t a l D U s : 4 , 2 3 2 ( S F D U s : 3 , 2 1 6 ; M F D U s : 1 , 0 1 6 ) T o t a l D U s : 4 , 2 3 2 ( S F D U s : 3 , 2 1 6 ; M F D U s : 1 , 0 1 6 ) CITY OFNAPLES CITY OFEVERGLADES Immokalee ¹ CITY OFMARCO ISLAND Corkscrew Rural Estates Royal Fakapalm Big Cypress UrbanEstates North Naples GoldenGateCentralNaples EastNaples SouthNaples Marco Marco 0 5 102.5 Miles LEGEND PLANNING COMMUNITY: RESIDENTIAL COs (04/01/19- 03/31/20)!. Central Naples North Naples Immokalee Big Cypress Urban Estates Golden Gate East Naples South Naples Marco Royal Fakapalm Rural Estates Corkscrew Incorporated Areas GIS Mapping: Beth Yang, AICPGrowth Management Department Page 67 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1740 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( ! ( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( SABAL BAY LELY RESORT HERITAGE BAY MARC.SHRS/FIDLR'S CRK MARC.SHRS/FIDLR'S CRK PELICAN BAY HACIENDA LAKES VINEYARDS WINDING CYPRESSMEDITERRA GREY OAKS WENTWORTH ESTATES QUAIL WEST TERAFINA ISLANDWALK PARKLANDS PELICAN MARSHWILLOW RUNFOXFIREESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLESCITY GATE WA R R E N B R O T H E R SPELICAN STRANDWYNDEMERE RIGASCOLLIER TRACT 22GREY OAKS GOLF CLUB OF THE EVERGLADES WINDSTARBER K S H I R E L A K E S T U S C A N Y R E S E R V E KINGS LAKELELY COUNTRY CLUBQUAIL IIGREY OAKS RETREAT EAGLE CREEKBRETONNE PARKLELY BAREFOOT BEACHKENSINGTON PARKAUDUBON COUNTRY CLUBLONGSHORE LAKETWELVE LAKESMONTEREYCOLL I E R T R A C T 2 1 BRIARWOODCARLTON LAKESORANGE TREEMALIBU LAKECYPRESS WOODS G & C CLUBTHREE HUN.AC.GOODLETTE RDSILVER LAKESIBIS COVEHOMES OF ISLANDIA COLLIER BLVDIMMOKALEE RD TAM I A M I T R L EINTERSTATE 75LIVINGSTON RDTAMIAMI TRL NSAN MARCO RDDAVIS BLVDGOODLETTE RD NPINE RIDGE RD RADIO RD GOLDEN GATE PKY LOGAN BLVD NSANTA BARBARA BLVDVANDERBILT BEACH RDVANDERBILT DRAIRPORT PULLING RD NGOLDEN GATE BLVD W 9TH ST N B A L D E A G L E D R N B A R F I E L D D R GREEN BLVDOLD US 41RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD WILSON BLVD NN COLLIER BLVDS BARFIELD DRS COLL IER BLVDCOUNTY BARN RDBONITA BEACH RD AIRPORT PULLING RD SVANDERBILT BEACH RD EXT WILSON BLVD SG O O D L A N D D R SEAGATE DR 9TH ST SBLUEBILL AVE CITY OFNAPLES LEE COUNTY LINE CITY OFMARCO ISLAND 2005-2020 RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY DATA(Date: 04/01/2005-03/31/2020) · YEAR* SF MF SF & MF2005-2006 2,572 2,144 4,7162006-2007 2,850 2,963 5,8132007-2008 1,403 2,732 4,1352008-2009 433 638 1,0712009-2010 563 459 1,0222010-2011 588 692 1,2802011-2012 747 480 1,2272012-2013 806 454 1,2602013-2014 1,436 286 1,7222014-2015 2,065 1,010 3,0752015-2016 2,548 777 3,3252016-2017 2,776 980 3,7562017-2018 2,440 444 2,8842018-2019 2,652 1,156 3,8082019-2020 3,216 1,016 4,232TOTAL 27,095 16,231 43,326 *YEAR=April 1 - March 31 Dwelling Units CO'd Countywide Legend Residential Single Family Planned Unit Development (PUD) Residential Multi Family Page 68 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1741 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) GG PKWY EVERGLADES BLVDDESOTO BLVDI-75 I-75 I 75SR 29COLLIER BLVDIMMOKALEE RD CR 858 TAMIAMI T R L ETAMIAMI TRL NSR 29 NSR 82 DAVIS BLVDGOODLETTE RD NRADIO RD IMMOKALEE RD E VANDERBILT DR1ST ST SSAN MARCO RD VANDERBILT BEACH RDLIVINGSTON RD NAIRPORT PULLING RD NGREEN BLVD COLLIER BLVD NLAKE TRAFFORD RD GOLDEN GATE BLVD WOLD US 41PINE RIDGE RD LIVINGSTON RD SRATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD WESTCLOX ST WILSON BLVD NAIRPORT PULLING RD SBONITA BEACH RD MAIN ST W I 75TAMIAMI T R E CR 858 TAMIAMI TR E TAM I A M I T R L E C O L L I E R C O U N T Y 2 0 2 0 A U I R P O P U L AT I O N ( P E A K S E A S O N ) C O L L I E R C O U N T Y 2 0 2 0 A U I R P O P U L AT I O N ( P E A K S E A S O N ) D I S T R I B U T I O N B Y T R A F F I C A N A LY S I S Z O N E D I S T R I B U T I O N B Y T R A F F I C A N A LY S I S Z O N E 0 5 102.5 Miles GIS Mapping: Beth Yang, AICPGrowth Management Department GULFOFMEXI COLake Trafford ³ 2020 Population Ranges: 306 - 559 560 - 956 957 - 1,344 1,345 - 1,753 1,754 - 2,275 2,276 - 2,935 2,936 - 4,512 4,513 - 8,060 0 - 95 96 - 305 Page 69 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1742 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( SABAL BAY LELY RESORT HERITAGE BAY MARC.SHRS/FIDLR'S CRK MARC.SHRS/FIDLR'S CRK PELICAN BAY HACIENDA LAKES VINEYARDS WINDING CYPRESSMEDITERRA GREY OAKS WENTWORTH ESTATES QUAIL WEST TERAFINA ISLANDWALK PARKLANDS PELICAN MARSHWILLOW RUNFOXFIREESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLESCITY GATE WA R R E N B R O T H E R SPELICAN STRANDWYNDEMERE RIGASCOLLIER TRACT 22GREY OAKS GOLF CLUB OF THE EVERGLADES WINDSTARBER K S H I R E L A K E S T U S C A N Y R E S E R V E KINGS LAKELELY COUNTRY CLUBQUAIL IIGREY OAKS RETREAT EAGLE CREEKBRETONNE PARKLELY BAREFOOT BEACHKENSINGTON PARKAUDUBON COUNTRY CLUBLONGSHORE LAKETWELVE LAKESMONTEREYCOLL I E R T R A C T 2 1 BRIARWOODCARLTON LAKESORANGE TREEMALIBU LAKECYPRESS WOODS G & C CLUBTHREE HUN.AC.GOODLETTE RDSILVER LAKESIBIS COVEHOMES OF ISLANDIA COLLIER BLVDIMMOKALEE RD TAM I A M I T R L EINTERSTATE 75LIVINGSTON RDTAMIAMI TRL NSAN MARCO RDDAVIS BLVDGOODLETTE RD NPINE RIDGE RD RADIO RD GOLDEN GATE PKY LOGAN BLVD NSANTA BARBARA BLVDVANDERBILT BEACH RDVANDERBILT DRAIRPORT PULLING RD NGOLDEN GATE BLVD W 9TH ST N B A L D E A G L E D R N B A R F I E L D D R GREEN BLVDOLD US 41RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD WILSON BLVD NN COLLIER BLVDS BARFIELD DRS COLL IER BLVDCOUNTY BARN RDBONITA BEACH RD AIRPORT PULLING RD SVANDERBILT BEACH RD EXT WILSON BLVD SG O O D L A N D D R SEAGATE DR 9TH ST SBLUEBILL AVE CITY OFNAPLES LEE COUNTY LINE CITY OFMARCO ISLAND GIS Mapping: Beth Yang, AICPGrowth Management Department 0 1 2 30.5 Miles 2019-2020 RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY DATA(Date: 04/01/2019-03/31/2020) · 2019-2020 Residential C.O Data:3,216* Single Family Units1,016* Multi Family Units *Approximated Values as of March 31, 2020 Legend Residential Single Family Planned Unit Development (PUD) Residential Multi Family!( !( Page 70 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1743 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Based on June 2020 Bud Workshop PARKS: Parks Impact Fee District Fund Regional Parks - Incorporated Areas (345) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Naples & Marco Permanent Population 38,890 39,274 39,658 40,042 40,426 40,810 41,212 Population Increase %0.99%0.98%0.97%0.96%0.95%0.98% FY 20 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY21 - FY25 Revenues Adopted Actual/Forecast Tentative Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Impact Fees-Regional 325,000 325,000 275,000 277,700 280,400 283,100 285,900 1,402,100 Interest/Misc.12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 60,000 Beginning Cash Balance (Carryfoward)2,100 1,659,900 384,700 384,700 Total Revenues:339,100 1,996,900 671,700 289,700 292,400 295,100 297,900 1,846,800 Project Expenses: Caxambas Community Center 0 1,498,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 Debt Service Expense (fund 345): Fd 298 - 2011 and 2013 bond 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Debt Service Payments to be made from Impact Fees.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parks Impact Fee District Fund Community and Regional Parks - Unincorporated Area (346) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 County Wide Peak Population - Regional Parks 456,784 465,754 474,299 483,001 491,863 500,887 508,998 Population Increase %1.96%1.83%1.83%1.83%1.83%1.62% Unincorporated Peak Population - Community Parks 410,116 418,625 426,709 434,950 443,351 451,914 459,543 Population Increase %2.07%1.93%1.93%1.93%1.93%1.69% FY 20 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY21 - FY25 Revenues Adopted Actual/Forecast Tentative Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Impact Fees-Regional 6,472,000 7,532,400 6,051,600 6,162,600 6,275,700 6,390,800 6,494,300 31,375,000 Impact Fees-Community 2,328,000 2,767,600 2,148,400 2,189,900 2,232,200 2,275,300 2,313,700 11,159,500 Interest/Misc.100,000 515,700 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 Beginning Cash Balance (Carryfoward)4,635,700 31,515,000 10,450,700 10,450,700 Total:13,535,700 42,330,700 19,150,700 8,852,500 9,007,900 9,166,100 9,308,000 55,485,200 Project Expenses: Big Corkscrew Pk Equipment 0 0 2,445,000 0 0 0 0 2,445,000 Big Corkscrew Park 4,790,200 27,792,500 9,893,200 5,141,800 0 0 0 15,035,000 Park Master Plan & Other on-going projects 0 172,800 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project expenses 4,790,200 27,965,300 12,338,200 5,141,800 0 0 0 17,480,000 Debt Service Expense (fund 346): 2013 Bond N Regional Pk 0 0 123,471 123,471 123,471 123,471 123,471 3,915,155 Reserve for (10/1/25) debt service payment 3,297,800 2011 bond N Regional Pk 2,939,300 2,939,300 2,824,529 2,818,329 2,820,429 2,828,829 2,857,929 14,150,045 Final debt service payment on 10/1/2025 0 2019 Loan GG Golf Course*540,400 540,400 765,100 768,900 2,919,000 2,933,300 2,856,600 12,090,900 Reserve for (10/1/25) debt service payment 1,848,000 Total Debt Service Payments to be made from Impact Fees.3,479,700 3,479,700 3,713,100 3,710,700 5,862,900 5,885,600 10,983,800 30,156,100 *The loan amt for GG Golf Course is the full annual debt service payment. Once the property is re-purposed, the debt will be allocated to the appropriate parties (funds). Page 1 6/27/2020Page 71 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1744 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Based on June 2020 Bud Workshop Emergency Medical Services EMS Impact Fee (350) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 County Wide Peak Population 456,784 465,754 474,299 483,001 491,863 500,887 508,998 Population Increase %1.96%1.83%1.83%1.83%1.83%1.62% FY 20 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY21 - FY25 Revenues Adopted Actual/Forecast Tentative Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Impact Fees 400,000 430,000 375,000 381,900 388,900 396,000 402,400 1,944,200 Interest/misc 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Bembridge - land sales 0 513,700 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reimbursement from GAC Land Trust 0 105,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Beginning Cash Balance (Carryfoward)394,400 3,340,800 1,140,400 1,140,400 Total:809,400 4,409,500 1,535,400 401,900 408,900 416,000 422,400 3,184,600 Project Expenses: EMS Station - GG Estates 0 270,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 EMS Station - Hacienda Lakes 0 2,528,900 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Project 0 71,200 30,000 0 0 0 0 30,000 0 2,870,100 30,000 0 0 0 0 30,000 Debt Service Expense (fund 350):2002/2010B bond helicopter 1 1 2013 bond Em Serv Ctr 109,000 109,000 109,000 109,000 109,000 109,000 109,000 804,800 Reserve for (10/1/25) debt service payment 259,800 2010/2017 bond ambulances, Old US41 land & ESC152,500 152,500 153,100 153,000 153,100 153,000 153,000 765,200 2011 bond Em Serv Ctr 180,700 180,700 180,800 182,500 182,800 183,400 185,400 914,900 Final debt service payment on 10/1/2025 0 Total Debt Service Payments to be made from Impact Fees.442,200 442,200 442,900 444,500 444,900 445,400 707,200 2,484,900 Page 2 6/27/2020Page 72 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1745 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Based on June 2020 Bud Workshop Collier County Library Department Library Impact Fee Fund (355) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 County Wide Peak Population 456,784 465,754 474,299 483,001 491,863 500,887 508,998 Population Increase %1.96%1.83%1.83%1.83%1.83%1.62% FY 20 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY21 - FY25 Revenues Adopted Actual/Forecast Tentative Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Impact Fees 910,000 960,000 775,000 789,200 803,700 818,400 831,700 4,018,000 Interest/Misc.11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 55,000 Grants & Donations (Books)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Beginning Cash Balance (Carryfoward)648,800 990,000 769,700 769,700 Total:1,569,800 1,961,000 1,555,700 800,200 814,700 829,400 842,700 4,842,700 Project Expenses Books 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Debt Service Expense (fund 355): 2010B bond N N Regional Lib 447,600 447,600 444,800 442,100 0 0 0 886,900 2010/2017 bond South Regional/exp GG Libraries 614,800 614,800 616,000 616,000 616,300 616,100 616,100 3,080,500 Total Debt Service Payments to be made from Impact Fees.1,062,400 1,062,400 1,060,800 1,058,100 616,300 616,100 616,100 3,967,400 total book budget for FY21-FY25 Page 3 6/27/2020Page 73 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1746 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Based on June 2020 Bud Workshop GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL FACILITIES: General Governmental Facilities Impact Fees (390) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 County Wide Peak Population 456,784 465,754 474,299 483,001 491,863 500,887 508,998 Population Increase %1.96%1.83%1.83%1.83%1.83%1.62% FY 20 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY21 - FY25 Revenues Adopted Actual/Forecast Tentative Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Impact Fees 2,625,000 2,625,000 2,500,000 2,545,900 2,592,600 2,640,200 2,683,000 12,961,700 Interest/Misc.35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 175,000 Loan/Transfer from General Fund (001)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Loan/Transfer from County-Wide Capital Improv Fund (301)1,751,000 2,251,000 2,192,100 3,014,600 2,764,200 2,723,900 355,400 11,050,200 Beginning Cash Balance (Carryfoward)4,052,400 3,552,400 3,878,100 3,878,100 Total:8,463,400 8,463,400 8,605,200 5,595,500 5,391,800 5,399,100 3,073,400 28,065,000 Debt Service Expense (fund 390): 2013 bond CH annex, garage, ESC, Fleet 1,358,400 1,358,400 1,358,400 1,358,400 1,358,400 1,358,400 1,358,400 7,471,200 Reserve for (10/1/25) debt service payment 679,200 2011 bond CH annex, garage, ESC, Fleet 2,251,800 2,251,800 2,253,400 2,274,500 2,277,400 2,285,300 2,309,800 11,400,400 Final debt service payment on 10/1/2025 0 2010/2017 bond Annex, Fleet, ESC 1,685,400 1,685,400 1,755,200 1,755,000 1,756,000 1,755,400 1,755,400 8,777,000 2010B bond N N Satellite Offices 210,200 210,200 208,800 207,600 0 0 0 416,400 Total Debt Service Payments to be made from Impact Fees.5,505,800 5,505,800 5,575,800 5,595,500 5,391,800 5,399,100 6,102,800 28,065,000 Page 4 6/27/2020Page 74 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1747 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Based on June 2020 Bud Workshop - CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES: Correctional Facilities Impact Fees (381) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 County Wide Peak Population 456,784 465,754 474,299 483,001 491,863 500,887 508,998 Population Increase %1.96%1.83%1.83%1.83%1.83%1.62% FY 20 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY21 - FY25 Revenues Adopted Actual/Forecast Tentative Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Impact Fees 1,610,000 1,700,000 1,350,000 1,374,800 1,400,000 1,425,700 1,448,800 6,999,300 Interest/Misc.12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 60,000 Loan/Transfer from County-Wide Capital Improv Fund (301)0 0 0 403,000 362,900 311,700 366,200 1,443,800 Beginning Cash Balance (Carryfoward)1,709,000 2,283,400 1,953,700 1,953,700 Total:3,331,000 3,995,400 3,315,700 1,789,800 1,774,900 1,749,400 1,827,000 10,456,800 Debt Service Expense (fund 381): 2013 bond Naples Jail expansion 285,500 285,500 285,500 285,500 285,500 285,500 285,500 1,570,200 Reserve for (10/1/25) debt service payment 142,700 2011 bond Naples Jail expansion 1,547,300 1,547,300 1,536,500 1,504,300 1,489,400 1,463,900 1,465,600 8,886,600 Reserve for (10/1/25) debt service payment 1,426,900 Total Debt Service Payments to be made from Impact Fees.1,832,800 1,832,800 1,822,000 1,789,800 1,774,900 1,749,400 3,320,700 10,456,800 LAW ENFORCEMENT FACILITY: Law Enforcement Facilities Impact Fees (385) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Unincorporated Area Peak Population 410,116 418,625 426,709 434,950 443,351 451,914 459,543 Everglades City Population 430 433 436 439 443 446 449 total 410,545 419,058 427,145 435,390 443,794 452,360 459,993 Population Increase %2.07%1.93%1.93%1.93%1.93%1.69% FY 20 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY21 - FY25 Revenues Adopted Actual/Forecast Tentative Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Impact Fees 1,450,000 1,650,000 1,400,000 1,427,000 1,454,500 1,482,600 1,507,600 7,271,700 Interest/misc 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Loan/Transfer from County-Wide Capital Improv Fund (301)0 0 0 388,200 362,000 335,000 (781,500)303,700 Beginning Cash Balance (Carryfoward)1,047,300 2,017,800 1,639,600 1,639,600 Total:2,517,300 3,687,800 3,059,600 1,835,200 1,836,500 1,837,600 746,100 9,315,000 Debt Service Expense (fund 385): 2013 bond EOC 263,900 263,900 263,900 263,900 263,900 263,900 263,900 1,451,500 Reserve for (10/1/25) debt service payment 132,000 2010/2017 bond Spec Ops, Fleet, EOC 1,127,400 1,127,400 1,129,600 1,129,400 1,130,100 1,129,700 1,129,700 5,648,500 2011 bond EOC 437,500 437,500 437,800 441,900 442,500 444,000 448,800 2,215,000 Final debt service payment on 10/1/2025 0 Total Debt Service Payments to be made from Impact Fees.1,828,800 1,828,800 1,831,300 1,835,200 1,836,500 1,837,600 1,974,400 9,315,000 Page 5 6/27/2020Page 75 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1748 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Based on June 2020 Bud Workshop OCHOPEE FIRE DISTRICT Ochopee Fire Control District Impact Fees (372) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 FY 20 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY21 - FY25 Revenues Adopted Actual/Forecast Tentative Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Impact Fees 8,000 7,700 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 40,000 Interest / misc 300 400 400 400 400 400 400 2,000 Loan Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Loan/Transfer from County-Wide Capital Improv Fund (301)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Beginning Cash (available) for Future Projects 6,100 39,500 3,600 3,600 Total:14,400 47,600 12,000 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 45,600 Debt Service Expense (fund 372): 2010/2017 bond 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010B bond 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2011 bond 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 bond 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Debt Service Payments to be made from Impact Fees.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 6 6/27/2020Page 76 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1749 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Total Impact Fee Related Debt Based on last debt issued on July 10, 2019 (Principal and Interest) Fiscal Year Fund 346 - Regional & Community Parks Impact Fees Fund 350 - EMS Impact Fees Fund 355 - Library Impact Fees Fund 381 - Correctional Impact Fees Fund 385 - Law Enforcement Impact Fees Fund 390 - General Governmental Facilities Impact Fee Total Gen Gov'tal Impact Fee Related Debt Fund 411 - Water System Development Fee Fund Fund 413 - Sewer System Development Fee Fund Total Utilities System Dev Fee Related Debt Total Impact Fee / System Dev Fee Debt by Year 2020 3,479,755 442,687 1,063,625 1,832,883 1,830,807 5,575,242 14,224,999 8,533,945 5,873,113 14,407,058 28,632,058 2021 3,716,826 442,838 1,060,842 1,822,010 1,831,281 5,575,758 14,449,555 8,525,292 5,884,372 14,409,664 28,859,219 2022 3,710,637 444,520 1,058,091 1,789,860 1,835,267 5,595,480 14,433,855 9,677,544 4,564,491 14,242,035 28,675,890 2023 5,862,912 444,840 616,339 1,774,961 1,836,474 5,391,806 15,927,331 6,666,991 4,216,264 10,883,255 26,810,586 2024 5,885,488 445,418 616,122 1,749,393 1,837,606 5,399,057 15,933,084 6,657,183 4,225,098 10,882,281 26,815,366 2025 5,837,984 447,391 616,146 1,751,169 1,842,413 5,423,641 15,918,743 6,757,651 3,538,343 10,295,994 26,214,738 2026 5,417,481 463,199 616,230 1,812,711 1,880,789 5,620,613 15,811,023 6,818,879 1,908,248 8,727,127 24,538,150 2027 5,223,336 472,506 616,038 1,807,785 1,903,085 5,736,641 15,759,390 6,546,421 586,153 7,132,574 22,891,964 2028 5,236,336 472,208 615,886 1,803,395 1,902,177 5,732,970 15,762,973 6,459,181 586,153 7,045,335 22,808,307 2029 5,240,432 472,079 615,919 1,799,324 1,901,906 5,731,350 15,761,010 8,291,206 974,100 9,265,306 25,026,316 2030 5,235,761 472,606 616,119 1,793,368 1,903,427 5,737,864 15,759,144 6,645,846 1,603,981 8,249,827 24,008,971 2031 - 466,198 615,662 1,990,953 1,887,351 5,658,129 10,618,294 6,648,319 1,603,794 8,252,113 18,870,407 2032 - 466,156 616,159 1,987,588 1,887,861 5,657,485 10,615,249 6,644,420 1,603,896 8,248,316 18,863,565 2033 - 465,275 616,120 1,980,494 1,885,680 5,646,516 10,594,086 6,644,280 1,604,247 8,248,527 18,842,612 2034 - 464,984 616,348 1,978,931 1,885,256 5,642,827 10,588,346 6,644,978 1,603,493 8,248,471 18,836,817 2035 - 314,882 - - 762,363 3,923,925 5,001,169 6,644,447 1,603,624 8,248,071 13,249,240 2036 - 314,725 - - 761,985 3,921,978 4,998,688 6,645,630 1,603,572 8,249,202 13,247,890 2037 - 3,729,948 2,098,694 5,828,643 5,828,643 2038 - 3,730,306 2,098,895 5,829,201 5,829,201 2039 - 3,730,982 2,099,276 5,830,258 5,830,258 Totals (20-39)54,846,946 7,512,513 10,575,647 27,674,825 29,575,728 91,971,281 222,156,940 132,643,450 49,879,807 182,523,257 404,680,198 Totals (21-39)51,367,191 7,069,827 9,512,022 25,841,941 27,744,920 86,396,039 207,931,941 124,109,505 44,006,694 168,116,199 376,048,140 N Collier Regional ESC Naples Jail ESC ESC 2013/15/16 Bonds (last pay't FY21/22/36) GG Golf Course Parking Garage 2016 Note/consolidate SRF Loans (last pay't FY29) 2011 Bond-last pay't FY25 Annex 2018 Bond - GG City Utilities (last pay't FY29) 2013 Bond-last pay't FY36 old US41 land S Regional Lib SO Fleet BCC Fleet 2019 Bond - NE Expansion (last pay't FY39) 2017 Bond-last pay't FY34 4 ambulances GG Lib Spec Ops 2010B Bond-last pay't FY22 Helicopter NN Regional Lib NN Satellite Office 2019 GG Golf Course Loan-last pay't FY30; total debt service is shown under Parks Fd 346. Once parcels are re-purposed, debt will be allocated to other funds.Page 77 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1750 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) APPENDIX II CONTENTS: • RECREATION FACILITY TYPE GUIDELINES • CURRENT COUNTY RECREATION FACILITIES ‒ INVENTORY • PLANNED COUNTY RECREATION FACILITIES • CONSERVATION COLLIER − TRAILS LIST • PARKS OPERATIONAL DATA Collier County 2016 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities Page 78 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1751 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 465,754 500,887 Required Required Anticipated LOS Guideline Inventory Current Surplus/Inventory Inventory Surplus/ Facility Guideline per 1000 2020 Inventory Deficit 2024 2024 Deficit Water Access Points 1/10,000 0.1 47 99 52 50 100 50 Athletic Fields*1/6,000 0.167 78 92 14 83 117 34 Hard Courts 1/4,000 0.25 116 229 113 125 261 136 Indoor Recreation Facility (sq ft).45/capita 450 209,589 221,843 12,254 225,399 231,843 6,444 Pathways/Conservation Trails (miles) **1/10,000 0.1 47 60.6 14 50 62.6 13 Water Access Points Athletic Fields Hard Courts Indoor Recreation Facility Pathway / Conservation Trail Includes community centers, fitness centers, gymnasiums, and other public indoor recreation facilities Includes stand-alone recreational pathways, trails in conservation lands, and recreational pathways removed by a physical separation from vehicular right-of-way; does not include sidewalks and bike lanes. * Athletic Fields show a surplus county-wide but does not take into consideration the deficits experienced at some of our park sites. **951 Pathway along Golden Gate Canal is 100% designed but there is no funding budgeted for construction Recreation Facility Type Guidelines 2020 Population: 2024 Population: Includes public beach access points, boat ramp lanes, fishing access points, canoe/kayak launches, and any other fresh or saltwater access facilities Note: Inventory includes 45 City of Naples beach, water accesses fishing access points. LOSG was determined with projected build-out population taken into consideration. Acquisition and development of surplus water access is advisable in consideration of its dwindling availability Includes softball, baseball, Little League, football/soccer/field hockey/lacrosse fields, and any other grass-surfaced playing fields (Master Plan states that we need additional athletic fields due to location and demand). Includes basketball, racquetball, shuffleboard, bocce, tennis, pickleball, and any other hard-surfaced playing courts Note: Current LOSG is approximately 1/2,500. LOSG was lowered in response to a significant quantity of hard courts available in the private sectorPage 79 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1752 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) District Location Type(R=Regional, C=Community,N=Neighborhood, S=School)AcreageBeach Acces PointsFishing Access PointsNonmotorized Vessel LaunchBoat Ramp LanesTOTAL Open WaterAccess PointsMultiuse FieldsSoccer/Football/LacrosseBaseball FieldsSoftball FieldsLittle League FieldsTOTAL Athletic FieldsTennis CourtsTennis/Pickleball Courts (1 Tennis = 3 Pickleball)Tennis/Pickleball Courts (1 Tennis = 2 Pickleball)Basketball CourtsRacquetball CourtsRacquetball/ Pickleball Courts (1 Racquetball = 1 Pickleball)Bocce CourtsShuffleboard CourtsPickelball CourtsTOTAL Hard CourtsIndoor RecreationFacility (sq ft)Multiuse Pathways/Trail milesCentral Naples Fred W Coyle Freedom Park R 25.16 1 1 0 0.72 Central Naples Gordon River Greenway Park R 79.00 1 1 0 0.99 Central Naples Naples Zoo R 50.00 0 0 52,184 2.00 Central Naples Rock Harbour Parcel N 0.10 0 East Naples Bay Street Land Parcels R 1.34 0 East Naples Bayview R 6.27 1 3 4 0 East Naples Cindy Mysels C 5.00 2 2 East Naples Coconut Circle N 1.20 0 1 East Naples East Naples CP C 47.00 1 1 3 1 4 2 4 4 6 38 East Naples Naples Manor N 0.30 0 0 East Naples Sugden Regl Park R 120.00 1 1 1 3 1 1 Golden Gate Aaron Lutz N 3.20 1 1 2 2 2 6 Golden Gate Paradise Coast Sports Park R 194.23 4 4 Golden Gate GG Comm Ctr C 21.00 1 1 3 Golden Gate Golden Gate CP C 35.00 2 2 1 1 2 1 5 3 6 1 2 4 1 4 1.50 Golden Gate Golden Gate Golf Course R 167.00 0 0 9,695 1.00 Golden Gate Golden Gate Greenway C 3.00 0 1,725 0.40 Golden Gate Palm Springs N 6.70 1 1 0 Golden Gate Rita Eaton Park N 4.80 0 1.51 Immokalee Airport Park C 19.00 1 1 Immokalee Anne Olesky / Lake Trafford R 2.30 1 1 2 0 Immokalee Dreamland N 0.50 1 1 0 8,906 2.00 Immokalee Eden Park Elementary S 2.80 1 1 2,476 1.50 Immokalee Imm High School S 1.00 0 2 1 3 6,594 2.00 Immokalee Immokalee CP C 23.00 2 1 1 4 2 3 2 7 4,277 Immokalee Immokalee South Park C 3.45 1 1 1 1 15,715 Immokalee Immokalee Sports Cplx C 14.00 3 3 1 Immokalee Oil Well Park N 5.50 0 Immokalee Panther Park (lease)N 0.50 0 1 Immokalee Pepper Ranch R 50.00 0 Immokalee Tony Rosbaugh Pk C 7.00 3 3 Marco 951 Boat Ramp R 0.50 2 2 0 Marco Caxambas Park R 4.20 1 2 3 0 Marco Goodland R 5.00 1 2 3 0 1.40 Marco Isles Capri N 0.35 0 1 1 Marco Isles Capri Land Parcel N 0.11 0 0 Marco Isles of Capri Paddlecraft Park R 9.00 1 1 0 1 Marco MarGood R 2.50 1 1 2 0 0 11,798 Marco South Marco R 5.00 1 1 0 Marco Tigertail Beach R 31.60 1 1 0 1,998 North Naples Barefoot Access R 5.00 1 1 0 North Naples Barefoot Beach State Land R 186.00 0 North Naples Barefoot Preserve R 159.60 1 1 2 0 North Naples Clam Pass R 35.00 1 1 2 0 0.21 North Naples Cocohatchee River R 7.56 1 4 5 0 0 North Naples Conner Park R 5.00 1 1 0 North Naples Naples Pk Elem/Starcher Pettay S 5.00 1 1 2 North Naples NC Regional Park R 207.70 1 1 8 5 13 2 North Naples NN Neighbor Park/Best Friends (surplus)N 0.36 0 1.00 North Naples North Gulfshore Beach Access R 0.50 1 1 0 2.88 North Naples Oakes Park N 2.00 1 1 0 North Naples Osceola School S 3.20 2 2 0.20 North Naples Palm River N 3.00 0 North Naples Pelican Bay C 15.00 1 1 8 1 4 2.00 North Naples Poinciana N 0.30 0 1 1 7,400 North Naples Vanderbilt Beach R 5.00 1 1 0 2020 AUIR Collier County Recreation Current Facilities Inventory Page 80 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1753 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) District Location Type(R=Regional, C=Community,N=Neighborhood, S=School)AcreageBeach Acces PointsFishing Access PointsNonmotorized Vessel LaunchBoat Ramp LanesTOTAL Open WaterAccess PointsMultiuse FieldsSoccer/Football/LacrosseBaseball FieldsSoftball FieldsLittle League FieldsTOTAL Athletic FieldsTennis CourtsTennis/Pickleball Courts (1 Tennis = 3 Pickleball)Tennis/Pickleball Courts (1 Tennis = 2 Pickleball)Basketball CourtsRacquetball CourtsRacquetball/ Pickleball Courts (1 Racquetball = 1 Pickleball)Bocce CourtsShuffleboard CourtsPickelball CourtsTOTAL Hard CourtsIndoor RecreationFacility (sq ft)Multiuse Pathways/Trail milesNorth Naples Vanderbilt Beach Access R 0.45 7 7 0 North Naples Veterans Comm Park C 43.64 1 1 3 5 8 4 2 4 North Naples Veterans Memorial S 4.00 2 2 4 North Naples Vineyards CP C 35.50 4 2 6 4 2 4 4 8 22 6,573 North Naples Willoughby Park N 1.20 0 South Naples Eagle Lakes Park C 32.00 2 1 1 4 2 1 3 10,123 2.00 South Naples Manatee C 60.00 0 2,380 0.40 South Naples Port of the Islands R 5.55 1 1 0 Urban Estates BCIRP R 62.00 0 Urban Estates BCIRP Lake R 90.00 0 Urban Estates Corkscrew Elementary/Middle S 16.90 1 1 1 3 4 2 2 Urban Estates Livingston Woods (surplus)N 2.73 0 0.27 Urban Estates Max Hasse CP C 20.00 2 2 2 1 Urban Estates Palmetto Elementary S 2.00 1 1 0 Urban Estates Randall Curve C 47.00 0 Urban Estates Rich King Greenway - FPL R 37.50 0 Urban Estates Sabal Palm Elem S 9.50 2 2 4 2 2 Urban Estates Vanderbilt Extension C 120.00 0 Central Naples Fred W Coyle Freedom Park PreserveP 12.50 1 1 0 0 24,376 0.72 Central Naples Gordon River Greenway Preserve P 50.51 1 1 0 0 0.99 East Naples Shell Island Preserve P 83.18 0 Immokalee Caracara Prairie Preserve P 367.70 0 Immokalee Panther Walk Preserve P 10.69 0 0 0.31 Immokalee Pepper Ranch Preserve P 2,511.90 0 0 20.09 Marco McIlvane Marsh P 380.89 0 Marco Otter Mound Preserve P 2.45 0 0.20 North Naples Alligator Flag Preserve P 18.46 0 0.49 North Naples Cochatchee Creek Preserve P 3.64 0 2,040 0.21 North Naples Logan Woods Preserve P 6.78 0 0.27 North Naples Railhead Scrub Preserve P 135.36 0 North Naples Wet Woods Preserve P 26.77 0 0 9,083 Urban Estates Camp Keais Strand P 32.50 0 7.17 Urban Estates Dr Robert H. Gore III P 171.21 0 Urban Estates Nancy Payton Preserve P 71.00 0 2.88 Urban Estates Red Maple Swamp Preserve P 213.88 0 Urban Estates Redroot Preserve P 9.26 0 0.63 Urban Estates Rivers Road Preserve P 76.74 0 1.51 Urban Estates Winchester Head Preserve P 87.41 0 Total Collier Units 6,460.63 15 13 7 17 52 15 30 5 20 9 79 40 8 5 33 24 0 3 16 46 175 177,343 59.45 City of Naples Anthony Park Neighbor 7.00 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 Beach Accesses R 0.50 42 42 Cambier Park C 12.84 1 1 12 1 2 5 20 12,000 Fleischmann Park C 25.26 2 2 2 6 2 4 4 10 7,000 Lowdermilk Park R 10.30 1 1 Naples Landings R 3.81 3 3 Naples Preserve R 9.78 0.40 Baker Park R 15.20 River Park CC C 1.61 1 1 11,000 Total Naples Units 86.30 43 1 0 3 47 3 0 3 1 2 9 13 0 0 5 4 0 2 5 4 33 30,000 0.40 City of Marco Island Frank Mackle C 30.00 1 1 2 6 8 7,000 0.50 Jane Hittler Neighbor 0.25 Leigh Plummer Neighbor 3.50 0.25 Racquet Center C 2.97 8 2 10 Veterans' Memorial Neighbor 0.25 2 2 Winterberry Neighbor 5.00 1 1 Total Marco Units 41.97 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 4 8 2 2 0 6 0 18 7,000 0.75 Everglades City Community Park C 0.86 7,500 McLeod Park C 1.04 2 1 3Page 81 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1754 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) District Location Type(R=Regional, C=Community,N=Neighborhood, S=School)AcreageBeach Acces PointsFishing Access PointsNonmotorized Vessel LaunchBoat Ramp LanesTOTAL Open WaterAccess PointsMultiuse FieldsSoccer/Football/LacrosseBaseball FieldsSoftball FieldsLittle League FieldsTOTAL Athletic FieldsTennis CourtsTennis/Pickleball Courts (1 Tennis = 3 Pickleball)Tennis/Pickleball Courts (1 Tennis = 2 Pickleball)Basketball CourtsRacquetball CourtsRacquetball/ Pickleball Courts (1 Racquetball = 1 Pickleball)Bocce CourtsShuffleboard CourtsPickelball CourtsTOTAL Hard CourtsIndoor RecreationFacility (sq ft)Multiuse Pathways/Trail milesTotal Everglades Units 1.90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 7,500 0 COUNTYWIDE 99 92 229 221,843 60.60 Page 82 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1755 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Anticipated Opening DateAquatic CenterBeach Parking SpacesBeach Acces PointsFishing Access PointsNonmotorized Vessel Launch / Canoe & KayakBoat Ramp LanesTOTAL Open Water Access PointsMultiuse Fields (Football/Soccer)Baseball FieldsSoftball FieldsLittle League FieldsTOTAL Athletic FieldsTennis CourtsTennis/Pickleball Courts (1 Tennis = 3 Pickleball)Tennis/Pickleball Courts (1 Tennis = 2 Pickleball)Basketball CourtsRacquetball CourtsRacquetball/ Pickleball Courts (1 Racquetball = 1 Pickleball)Bocce CourtsShuffleboard CourtsPickelball CourtsTOTAL Hard CourtsIndoor Recreation Facility (sq ft)Multiuse Pathways/Trails (miles)Location 2020/21-2024/25 East Naples Community Park 2019/2020 0 -1 -1 20 20 Big Corkscrew Island RP-Facility Dev - PH 1 2020/2021 1 1 4 2 6 2 2 6 10 10,000 2 Big Corkscrew Island RP-Facility Dev - PH 2 2021/2022 4 4 2 2 Paradise Coast Sport Complex PH1 4 4 Paradise Coast Sport Complex PH2 5 6 1 12 0 2020/21-2024/25 1 25 32 10,000 2 Anticipated Opening DateAquatic CenterBeach Parking SpacesBeach Acces PointsFishing Access PointsNonmotorized Vessel Launch / Canoe & KayakBoat Ramp LanesTOTAL Open Water Access PointsMultiuse Fields (Football/Soccer)Baseball FieldsSoftball FieldsLittle League FieldsTOTAL Athletic FieldsTennis CourtsTennis/Pickleball Courts (1 Tennis = 3 Pickleball)Tennis/Pickleball Courts (1 Tennis = 2 Pickleball)Basketball CourtsRacquetball CourtsRacquetball/ Pickleball Courts (1 Racquetball = 1 Pickleball)Bocce CourtsShuffleboard CourtsPickelball CourtsTOTAL Hard CourtsIndoor Recreation Facility (sq ft)Multiuse Pathways/TrailsLocation 2026/27-2029/30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/27-2029/30 0 0 0 0 0 10 yr. Total 2020/21-2029/30 1 25 32 10,000 2 2020 AUIR Collier County Planned Recreation Facilities (2020/21 through 2024/25) 2020 AUIR Collier County Planned Recreation Facilities (2026/27 through 2029/30) Page 83 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1756 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Preserve Preserve Acreage Linear feet o Miles of Trails Acres of Trails and Amenities ("Usable acreage") Camp Keais Strand 32.50 174 178998 Dr. Robert H. Gore III 171.21 174 178977 McIlvane Marsh 380.89 174 178998 Railhead Scrub 135.36 174 178995 Red Maple Swamp 213.88 174 178997 Shell Island 83.18 174 178998 Wet Woods 26.77 174 178998 Winchester Head 87.41 174 178998 Alligator Flag 18.46 2,567 0.49 0.59 174 178998 Caracara Prairie Preserve 367.70 37,855 7.17 10.43 674 178988 Cocohatchee Creek Preserve 3.64 1,090 0.21 0.22 174 178998 Freedom Park 12.50 3,805 0.72 0.94 174 178998 Gordon River Greenway 50.51 5,213 0.99 1.35 174 178992 Logan Woods 6.78 1,400 0.27 0.29 174 178998 Nancy Payton Preserve 71.00 15,182 2.88 3.53 174 178993 Otter Mound Preserve 2.45 1,060 0.20 0.20 174 178998 Panther Walk Preserve 10.69 1,624 0.31 0.30 174 178998 *Pepper Ranch Preserve 2,511.90 106,061 20.09 31.08 174 178994 AND 673 Redroot Preserve 9.26 3,319 0.63 0.76 174 178998 Rivers Road Preserve 76.74 7,977 1.51 2.49 174 178996 Total 4,272.83 187,153 35.45 52.18 *Table does not include the 50 acres already accounted in the AUIR for at Pepper Ranch Preserve Conservation Collier Trails Fund and Cost Center Page 84 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1757 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Facility Attribute Inventory 2018Facility Attribute Inventory 2020 District Location FUND Cost Center Type (R=Regional, C=Community, N=Neighborhood , S=School, P=Preserve) Acreage Preserve Acreage Active Acreage - Developed Active Acreage - Undeveloped Community Park Acres Regional Park Acres Neighborhood Park Acres Amphitheater Archeological Site Baseball Fields Baseball Poles Baseball Lights Basketball Courts / Indoor and Outdoor Beach / Lakefront Operations Bike / Walk / Hike Trails BMX Tracks Boat Ramps Bocce Campgrounds Canoe / Kayak Launch Community / Recreation Center Concession Building/ Trailer Cricket Disc Golf Dog Parks Fishing / Catch and Release Fishing / Dock / Pier Central Naples Rock Harbour Parcel 111 122255 N 0.10 0.10 0.10 Central Naples Fred W Coyle Freedom Park Preserve 174 178998 P 12.50 12.50 0.38 Central Naples Gordon River Greenway Preserve 174 178992 P 50.51 50.51 0.64 Central Naples Fred W Coyle Freedom Park 001 156366 R 25.16 8.41 16.75 25.16 1 1 Central Naples Gordon River Greenway Park 001 156338 R 79.00 79.00 79.00 1 1 Central Naples Naples Zoo 001 R 50.00 50.00 50.00 East Naples Naples Manor 111 156332 N 0.30 0.30 0.30 East Naples Coconut Circle 111 156332 N 1.20 1.20 1.20 1 East Naples Cindy Mysels 111 156381 C 5.00 5.00 5.00 East Naples East Naples CP 111 185381 C 47.00 22.05 24.95 47.00 4 2 1 1 1 East Naples Shell Island Preserve 174 178998 P 83.18 83.18 East Naples Bay Street Land Parcels 001 156338 R 1.34 1.34 East Naples Bayview 001 156338 R 6.27 6.27 6.27 3 1 East Naples Sugden Regl Park 001 156361 R 120.00 22.85 97.15 120.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 Golden Gate Aaron Lutz 111 156332 N 3.20 3.20 3.20 2 Golden Gate Rita Eaton Park 111 156332 N 4.80 4.80 4.80 Golden Gate Palm Springs 111 156332 N 6.70 6.70 6.70 1 1 Golden Gate GG Comm Ctr 130 157710 C 21.00 21.00 21.00 1 3 1 1 1 Golden Gate Golden Gate CP 111 156313 C 35.00 35.00 35.00 1 8 98 2 2 2 1 1 1 Golden Gate Golden Gate Greenway 111 156332 C 3.00 3.00 3.00 Golden Gate Serenity Walk Park 111 156332 N Golden Gate Paradise Coast Sports Complex Park 759 101551 R 194.23 194.23 194.23 1 Golden Gate Golden Gate Golf Course 001 156370 R 167.00 167.00 Immokalee Dreamland 111 156332 N 0.50 0.50 0.50 Immokalee Panther Park (lease)111 156332 N 0.50 0.50 0.50 1 Immokalee Oil Well Park 111 156332 N 5.50 5.50 5.50 Immokalee Airport Park 111 156332 C 19.00 19.00 19.00 1 Immokalee Immokalee CP 111 156343 C 23.00 23.00 23.00 1 8 60 3 1 1 1 Immokalee Immokalee South Park 111 156385 C 3.45 3.45 3.45 1 1 Immokalee Immokalee Sports Cplx 111 156349 C 14.00 14.00 14.00 1 Immokalee Tony Rosbaugh Pk 111 156349 C 7.00 7.00 7.00 1 Immokalee Caracara Prairie Preserve 674 178988 P 367.70 367.70 2.8 Immokalee Panther Walk Preserve 174 178998 P 10.69 10.69 0.3 Immokalee Pepper Ranch - Panther Habitat Mitigation Fund 673 178998 P Immokalee Pepper Ranch Preserve 174 178994 P 2,511.90 2,511.90 16.63 Immokalee Anne Olesky / Lake Trafford 001 156338 R 2.30 2.30 2.30 1 1 Immokalee Pepper Ranch - (incl.Panther Mitigation acres) 174 178994 R 50.00 50.00 1 10 Immokalee Eden Park Elementary 111 156332 S 2.80 2.80 2.80 Immokalee Imm High School 111 156332 S 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Immokalee Small Cemetery 111 156332 Marco Isles Capri Land Parcel 111 156332 N 0.11 0.11 0.11 Marco Isles Capri 111 156332 N 0.35 0.15 0.20 0.35 1 Marco McIlvane Marsh 174 178998 P 380.89 380.89 Marco Otter Mound Preserve 174 178998 P 2.45 2.45 0.19 Marco 951 Boat Ramp 001 156363 R 0.50 0.50 0.50 2 Marco Caxambas Park 001 156364 R 4.20 4.20 4.20 2 1 1 Marco Goodland 001 156364 R 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.5 2 1 1 Marco Isles of Capri Paddlecraft Park 001 156363 R 9.00 9.00 1 1 Marco MarGood 001 156338 R 2.50 2.50 2.50 1 1 1 Marco South Marco 001 156363 R 5.00 5.00 5.00 1 Marco Tigertail Beach 001 156363 R 31.60 22.83 8.77 31.60 1 6 1 North Naples Poinciana 111 156332 N 0.30 0.30 0.30 1 North Naples NN Neighbor Park/Best Friends (surplus)111 156332 N 0.36 0.36 North Naples Willoughby Park 111 156332 N 1.20 1.20 1.20 1 North Naples Oakes Park 111 156332 N 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.5 1 North Naples Palm River 111 156332 N 3.00 3.00 1 North Naples Pelican Bay 111 156380 C 15.00 15.00 15.00 1 1 1 North Naples Veterans Comm Park 111 156380 C 43.64 43.64 43.64 1 8 72 2 1 1 2 1 North Naples Vineyards CP 111 156390 C 35.50 35.50 35.50 2 1 1 1 North Naples Alligator Flag Preserve 174 178998 P 18.46 18.46 0.49 North Naples Cochatchee Creek Preserve 174 178998 P 3.64 3.64 0.23 North Naples Logan Woods Preserve 174 178998 P 6.78 6.78 0.19 North Naples Railhead Scrub Preserve 174 178995 P 135.36 135.36 North Naples Wet Woods Preserve 174 178998 P 26.77 26.77 North Naples Barefoot Access 001 156363 R 5.00 5.00 5.00 1 North Naples Barefoot Beach State Land 001 156363 R 186.00 186.00 North Naples Barefoot Preserve 001 156363 R 159.60 159.60 159.60 1 1 1 1 North Naples Clam Pass 001 156363 R 35.00 13.13 21.87 35.00 1 1 1 1 North Naples Cocohatchee River 001 156363 R 7.56 7.20 0.36 7.56 4 1 1 North Naples Conner Park 001 156338 R 5.00 5.00 5.00 North Naples NC Regional Park 001 156312/156365/ 156344/156312 R 207.70 207.70 207.70 2 1 3 1 North Naples North Gulfshore Beach Access 001 156338 R 0.50 0.50 0.50 1 North Naples Vanderbilt Access 001 156363 R 0.45 0.45 7 North Naples Vanderbilt Beach 001 156363 R 5.00 5.00 5.00 1 1 North Naples Naples Pk Elem/Starcher Pettay 111 156380 S 5.00 5.00 5.00 1 North Naples Osceola School 111 156332 S 3.20 3.20 3.20 North Naples Veterans Memorial 111 156380 S 4.00 4.00 4.00 South Naples Eagle Lakes Park 111 156398 C 32.00 3.20 28.80 32.00 1 8 56 1 2 2 1 1 South Naples Manatee 111 156332 C 60.00 60.00 60.00 South Naples Port of the Islands 001 156364 R 5.55 5.55 5.55 2 1 Urban Estates Livingston Woods (surplus)174 178998 N 2.73 2.73 Urban Estates Max Hasse CP 111 156395 C 20.00 6.55 13.45 20.00 1 1 1 Urban Estates Randall Curve 111 156332 C 47.00 47.00 47.00 Urban Estates Vanderbilt Extension 111 156332 C 120.00 120.00 120.00 Urban Estates Camp Keais Strand 174 178998 P 32.50 32.50 Urban Estates Dr Robert H. Gore III 174 178977 P 171.21 171.21 Urban Estates Nancy Payton Preserve 174 178993 P 71.00 71.00 1.89 Urban Estates Red Maple Swamp Preserve 174 178997 P 213.88 213.88 0.63 Urban Estates Redroot Preserve 174 178998 P 9.26 9.26 Urban Estates Rivers Road Preserve 174 178996 P 76.74 76.74 Urban Estates Winchester Head Preserve 174 178998 P 87.41 87.41 Urban Estates BCIRP 001 156367 R 62.00 62.00 Urban Estates BCIRP Lake 001 156367 R 90.00 90.00 90.00 Urban Estates Rich King Greenway - FPL 001 156338 R 37.50 37.50 1 Urban Estates Corkscrew Elementary/Middle 111 156332 S 16.90 16.90 16.90 1 8 58 2 Urban Estates Palmetto Elementary 111 156332 S 2.00 2.00 2.00 Urban Estates Sabal Palm Elem 111 156332 S 9.50 9.50 9.50 2 County-wide Total 6,460.63 4,421.95 972.51 546.79 594.99 1,559.96 32.85 2.00 2.00 5.00 40.00 344.00 33.00 16.00 49.37 1.00 18.00 3.00 10.00 6.00 10.00 25.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 6.00 6.00 Water Access Points 52 Athletic Fields 79 Hard Courts 175Page 85 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1758 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Facility Attribute Inventory 2018Facility Attribute Inventory 2020 District Location FUND Cost Center Type (R=Regional, C=Community, N=Neighborhood , S=School, P=Preserve) Central Naples Rock Harbour Parcel 111 122255 N Central Naples Fred W Coyle Freedom Park Preserve 174 178998 P Central Naples Gordon River Greenway Preserve 174 178992 P Central Naples Fred W Coyle Freedom Park 001 156366 R Central Naples Gordon River Greenway Park 001 156338 R Central Naples Naples Zoo 001 R East Naples Naples Manor 111 156332 N East Naples Coconut Circle 111 156332 N East Naples Cindy Mysels 111 156381 C East Naples East Naples CP 111 185381 C East Naples Shell Island Preserve 174 178998 P East Naples Bay Street Land Parcels 001 156338 R East Naples Bayview 001 156338 R East Naples Sugden Regl Park 001 156361 R Golden Gate Aaron Lutz 111 156332 N Golden Gate Rita Eaton Park 111 156332 N Golden Gate Palm Springs 111 156332 N Golden Gate GG Comm Ctr 130 157710 C Golden Gate Golden Gate CP 111 156313 C Golden Gate Golden Gate Greenway 111 156332 C Golden Gate Serenity Walk Park 111 156332 N Golden Gate Paradise Coast Sports Complex Park 759 101551 R Golden Gate Golden Gate Golf Course 001 156370 R Immokalee Dreamland 111 156332 N Immokalee Panther Park (lease)111 156332 N Immokalee Oil Well Park 111 156332 N Immokalee Airport Park 111 156332 C Immokalee Immokalee CP 111 156343 C Immokalee Immokalee South Park 111 156385 C Immokalee Immokalee Sports Cplx 111 156349 C Immokalee Tony Rosbaugh Pk 111 156349 C Immokalee Caracara Prairie Preserve 674 178988 P Immokalee Panther Walk Preserve 174 178998 P Immokalee Pepper Ranch - Panther Habitat Mitigation Fund 673 178998 P Immokalee Pepper Ranch Preserve 174 178994 P Immokalee Anne Olesky / Lake Trafford 001 156338 R Immokalee Pepper Ranch - (incl.Panther Mitigation acres) 174 178994 R Immokalee Eden Park Elementary 111 156332 S Immokalee Imm High School 111 156332 S Immokalee Small Cemetery 111 156332 Marco Isles Capri Land Parcel 111 156332 N Marco Isles Capri 111 156332 N Marco McIlvane Marsh 174 178998 P Marco Otter Mound Preserve 174 178998 P Marco 951 Boat Ramp 001 156363 R Marco Caxambas Park 001 156364 R Marco Goodland 001 156364 R Marco Isles of Capri Paddlecraft Park 001 156363 R Marco MarGood 001 156338 R Marco South Marco 001 156363 R Marco Tigertail Beach 001 156363 R North Naples Poinciana 111 156332 N North Naples NN Neighbor Park/Best Friends (surplus)111 156332 N North Naples Willoughby Park 111 156332 N North Naples Oakes Park 111 156332 N North Naples Palm River 111 156332 N North Naples Pelican Bay 111 156380 C North Naples Veterans Comm Park 111 156380 C North Naples Vineyards CP 111 156390 C North Naples Alligator Flag Preserve 174 178998 P North Naples Cochatchee Creek Preserve 174 178998 P North Naples Logan Woods Preserve 174 178998 P North Naples Railhead Scrub Preserve 174 178995 P North Naples Wet Woods Preserve 174 178998 P North Naples Barefoot Access 001 156363 R North Naples Barefoot Beach State Land 001 156363 R North Naples Barefoot Preserve 001 156363 R North Naples Clam Pass 001 156363 R North Naples Cocohatchee River 001 156363 R North Naples Conner Park 001 156338 R North Naples NC Regional Park 001 156312/156365/ 156344/156312 R North Naples North Gulfshore Beach Access 001 156338 R North Naples Vanderbilt Access 001 156363 R North Naples Vanderbilt Beach 001 156363 R North Naples Naples Pk Elem/Starcher Pettay 111 156380 S North Naples Osceola School 111 156332 S North Naples Veterans Memorial 111 156380 S South Naples Eagle Lakes Park 111 156398 C South Naples Manatee 111 156332 C South Naples Port of the Islands 001 156364 R Urban Estates Livingston Woods (surplus)174 178998 N Urban Estates Max Hasse CP 111 156395 C Urban Estates Randall Curve 111 156332 C Urban Estates Vanderbilt Extension 111 156332 C Urban Estates Camp Keais Strand 174 178998 P Urban Estates Dr Robert H. Gore III 174 178977 P Urban Estates Nancy Payton Preserve 174 178993 P Urban Estates Red Maple Swamp Preserve 174 178997 P Urban Estates Redroot Preserve 174 178998 P Urban Estates Rivers Road Preserve 174 178996 P Urban Estates Winchester Head Preserve 174 178998 P Urban Estates BCIRP 001 156367 R Urban Estates BCIRP Lake 001 156367 R Urban Estates Rich King Greenway - FPL 001 156338 R Urban Estates Corkscrew Elementary/Middle 111 156332 S Urban Estates Palmetto Elementary 111 156332 S Urban Estates Sabal Palm Elem 111 156332 S County-wide Total Water Access Points 52 Athletic Fields 79 Hard Courts 175 Fitness Centers Fitness Pavilion Food Truck Pavilion Gymnasium Horseshoes Little League Fields Little League Poles Little League Lights Market Building Marinas Multipurpose Facility Multiuse Fields Nature / Cultural / Historical Centers Pickleball Courts Picnic Pavilions Playgrounds Racquetball Courts Racquetball/Pickleball Courts (1 Raquet = 1 Pickle) Roller Hockey (Inline skate) Rinks Senior Centers Shuffleboard Skate Park Soccer / Football Fields Soccer Poles Soccer Lights Softball Fields Softball Poles Softball Lights Splash Parks Stadium 1 3 2 1 1 1 2 8 38 1 38 4 1 4 1 6 3 12 80 1 8 29 6 1 2 1 7 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 24 3 1 4 4 1 6 42 2 14 54 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 14 48 1 1 1 1 3 18 109 3 8 45 5 1 1 6 32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 8 2 1 4 1 1 6 46 3 20 102 7 1 4 4 4 2 15 157 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 13 1 8 36 288 5 42 220 1 8 29 2 12 67 1 2 2 6 34 1 4 2 2 12 64 1 8 52 0 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 6 32 1 6 42 1 6 28 2 8 52 2 12 66 5.00 3.00 2.00 9.00 42.00 203.00 4.00 4.00 15.00 4.00 46.00 74.00 30.00 24.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 16.00 2.00 30.00 122.00 807.00 20.00 139.00 770.00 1.00Page 86 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1759 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Facility Attribute Inventory 2018Facility Attribute Inventory 2020 District Location FUND Cost Center Type (R=Regional, C=Community, N=Neighborhood , S=School, P=Preserve) Central Naples Rock Harbour Parcel 111 122255 N Central Naples Fred W Coyle Freedom Park Preserve 174 178998 P Central Naples Gordon River Greenway Preserve 174 178992 P Central Naples Fred W Coyle Freedom Park 001 156366 R Central Naples Gordon River Greenway Park 001 156338 R Central Naples Naples Zoo 001 R East Naples Naples Manor 111 156332 N East Naples Coconut Circle 111 156332 N East Naples Cindy Mysels 111 156381 C East Naples East Naples CP 111 185381 C East Naples Shell Island Preserve 174 178998 P East Naples Bay Street Land Parcels 001 156338 R East Naples Bayview 001 156338 R East Naples Sugden Regl Park 001 156361 R Golden Gate Aaron Lutz 111 156332 N Golden Gate Rita Eaton Park 111 156332 N Golden Gate Palm Springs 111 156332 N Golden Gate GG Comm Ctr 130 157710 C Golden Gate Golden Gate CP 111 156313 C Golden Gate Golden Gate Greenway 111 156332 C Golden Gate Serenity Walk Park 111 156332 N Golden Gate Paradise Coast Sports Complex Park 759 101551 R Golden Gate Golden Gate Golf Course 001 156370 R Immokalee Dreamland 111 156332 N Immokalee Panther Park (lease)111 156332 N Immokalee Oil Well Park 111 156332 N Immokalee Airport Park 111 156332 C Immokalee Immokalee CP 111 156343 C Immokalee Immokalee South Park 111 156385 C Immokalee Immokalee Sports Cplx 111 156349 C Immokalee Tony Rosbaugh Pk 111 156349 C Immokalee Caracara Prairie Preserve 674 178988 P Immokalee Panther Walk Preserve 174 178998 P Immokalee Pepper Ranch - Panther Habitat Mitigation Fund 673 178998 P Immokalee Pepper Ranch Preserve 174 178994 P Immokalee Anne Olesky / Lake Trafford 001 156338 R Immokalee Pepper Ranch - (incl.Panther Mitigation acres) 174 178994 R Immokalee Eden Park Elementary 111 156332 S Immokalee Imm High School 111 156332 S Immokalee Small Cemetery 111 156332 Marco Isles Capri Land Parcel 111 156332 N Marco Isles Capri 111 156332 N Marco McIlvane Marsh 174 178998 P Marco Otter Mound Preserve 174 178998 P Marco 951 Boat Ramp 001 156363 R Marco Caxambas Park 001 156364 R Marco Goodland 001 156364 R Marco Isles of Capri Paddlecraft Park 001 156363 R Marco MarGood 001 156338 R Marco South Marco 001 156363 R Marco Tigertail Beach 001 156363 R North Naples Poinciana 111 156332 N North Naples NN Neighbor Park/Best Friends (surplus)111 156332 N North Naples Willoughby Park 111 156332 N North Naples Oakes Park 111 156332 N North Naples Palm River 111 156332 N North Naples Pelican Bay 111 156380 C North Naples Veterans Comm Park 111 156380 C North Naples Vineyards CP 111 156390 C North Naples Alligator Flag Preserve 174 178998 P North Naples Cochatchee Creek Preserve 174 178998 P North Naples Logan Woods Preserve 174 178998 P North Naples Railhead Scrub Preserve 174 178995 P North Naples Wet Woods Preserve 174 178998 P North Naples Barefoot Access 001 156363 R North Naples Barefoot Beach State Land 001 156363 R North Naples Barefoot Preserve 001 156363 R North Naples Clam Pass 001 156363 R North Naples Cocohatchee River 001 156363 R North Naples Conner Park 001 156338 R North Naples NC Regional Park 001 156312/156365/ 156344/156312 R North Naples North Gulfshore Beach Access 001 156338 R North Naples Vanderbilt Access 001 156363 R North Naples Vanderbilt Beach 001 156363 R North Naples Naples Pk Elem/Starcher Pettay 111 156380 S North Naples Osceola School 111 156332 S North Naples Veterans Memorial 111 156380 S South Naples Eagle Lakes Park 111 156398 C South Naples Manatee 111 156332 C South Naples Port of the Islands 001 156364 R Urban Estates Livingston Woods (surplus)174 178998 N Urban Estates Max Hasse CP 111 156395 C Urban Estates Randall Curve 111 156332 C Urban Estates Vanderbilt Extension 111 156332 C Urban Estates Camp Keais Strand 174 178998 P Urban Estates Dr Robert H. Gore III 174 178977 P Urban Estates Nancy Payton Preserve 174 178993 P Urban Estates Red Maple Swamp Preserve 174 178997 P Urban Estates Redroot Preserve 174 178998 P Urban Estates Rivers Road Preserve 174 178996 P Urban Estates Winchester Head Preserve 174 178998 P Urban Estates BCIRP 001 156367 R Urban Estates BCIRP Lake 001 156367 R Urban Estates Rich King Greenway - FPL 001 156338 R Urban Estates Corkscrew Elementary/Middle 111 156332 S Urban Estates Palmetto Elementary 111 156332 S Urban Estates Sabal Palm Elem 111 156332 S County-wide Total Water Access Points 52 Athletic Fields 79 Hard Courts 175 Stage Swimming / Aquatic Center Tennis Courts Tennis/ Pickleball Courts (1 Tennis = 3 Pickle) Tennis/ Pickleball Courts (1 Tennis = 2 Pickle) Ticket Booth Track / Running Volleyball Courts Water Park Welcome Center Car Parking Car Handicapped Parking Law Enforcement Parking Boat Trailer Parking Hanidcapped Trailer Parking Car Overflow Parking Trailer Overflow Parking Total Parking Spaces Beach Parking Spaces Parking Garage 37 3 40 46 3 49 31 4 35 40 2 42 2 1 204 6 42 252 12 2 1 46 2 9 72 1 183 16 199 2 1 14 1 15 268 14 282 1 3 6 1 391 17 10 418 1 1 1 2 1 142 8 150 1 1 521 7 528 67 2 69 6 2 7 15 2 10 72 2 84 14 2 29 2 47 13 2 1 73 2 91 51 6 4 61 18 2 20 64 3 67 67 210 6 10 226 216 1 8 1 57 3 60 8 4 1 331 8 339 4 279 10 289 90 6 96 96 229 13 160 402 402 191 7 198 198 84 4 54 1 143 150 6 156 156 1 1154 28 1182 36 2 38 38 349 12 361 361 1 2 40 40 1 2 120 8 200 328 22 2 21 50 95 2 204 9 213 4 1 3.00 40.00 8.00 5.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 5,678.00 226.00 12.00 316.00 9.00 402.00 59.00 6,702.00 1,534.00 1.00Page 87 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1760 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) District Location Anticipated Opening DateBaseball FieldsBasketball Courts / Indoor and OutdoorBch Parking SpacesBeach / Lakefront OperationsBike / Walk / Hike TrailsBMX TracksBoat RampsBocceCampgroundsCanoe / Kayak LaunchCommunity / Recreation CenterConcession BuildingDog ParksFishing / Catch and ReleaseFishing / Dock / PierFitness CentersFitness PavilionFood Truck PavilionGymnasiumHorseshoesLittle League FieldsMarket BuildingMarinasMultipurpose FacilityMultiuse FieldsNature / Cultural / Historical CentersPickleball CourtsPicnic PavilionsPlaygroundsRacquetball CourtsRacquetball/Pickleball Courts (1 Raquet = 1 Pickle)Roller Hockey (Inline skate) RinksSenior CentersShuffleboard Skate ParkSoccer / Football FieldsSoftball FieldsSplash ParksStadiumStageSwimming / Aquatic CenterTennis CourtsTennis/Pickleball Courts (1 Tennis = 3 Pickle)Tennis/Pickleball Courts (1 Tennis = 2 Pickle)Ticket BoothTrack / RunningVolleyball CourtsWater ParkWelcome CenterEast Naples Community Park 19/20 -1 20 Big Corkscrew Island RP - PH 1 20/21 Big Corkscrew Island RP - PH 2 21/22 Paradise Coast Sports PH 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 Paradise Coast Sports PH 2 6 1 5 County-wide Total 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Water Access Points 0 Athletic Fields 15 Hard Courts 20 Future Attribute Inventory Page 88 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1761 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Capital Fund 346 Additions FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 BCIRP 28,687,475$ 28,623,729$ Eagle Lakes Master plan - Communcity Ctr.-$ 550,000.00 -$ Total 28,687,475$ 29,173,729$ -$ -$ -$ Impact Fees $325,000.00 3,710,637$ 5,862,912$ 5,885,488$ 5,837,984$ Debt Service 3,479,755$ 3,716,826$ 3,710,637$ 5,862,912$ 5,885,488$ Expenses 28,687,475$ 29,173,729$ -$ -$ -$ Reserves (31,842,230)$ (29,179,918)$ 2,152,275$ 22,576$ (47,504)$ already budgeted 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Impact Fee 3,710,637$ 5,862,912$ 5,885,488$ 5,885,488$ 5,837,984$ 5,417,481$ Page 89 of 1059.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1762 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) FY 18 Q1 FY 18 Q2 FY 18 Q3 FY 18 Q4 FY 18 YE CENTRAL AVE LIBRARY 2,315 2,600 2,698 2,046 9,659 ELCP 1,206 1,650 1,006 691 4,553 ENCP 1,955 4,064 2,079 1,359 9,457 EVERGLADES CITY 11 62 64 39 176 FREEDOM PARK 240 485 424 272 1,421 GGCC 2,966 4,369 4,935 2,884 15,154 IMCP 93 164 153 118 528 MARCO LIBRARY 1,684 2,213 1,655 1,257 6,809 MHCP 580 706 432 640 2,358 NCRP 1,228 1,655 1,191 878 4,952 NORTH COLLIER SERVICE CENTER 6,433 4,698 4,352 6,893 22,376 TAX COLLECTOR 3,771 4,396 3,720 3,031 14,918 VTCP 5,400 6,600 5,299 3,151 20,450 VYCP 1,329 2,119 1,815 1,189 6,452 TOTAL 29,211 35,781 29,823 24,448 119,263 FY 19 Q1 FY 19 Q2 FY 19 Q3 FY 19 Q4 FY 19 YE CENTRAL AVE LIBRARY 2,350 3,535 2,858 1,841 10,584 ELCP 1,456 1,979 1,149 799 5,383 ENCP 3,181 3,777 2,124 1,332 10,414 EVERGLADES CITY 25 78 53 36 192 FREEDOM PARK 236 599 692 343 1,870 GGCC 3,080 3,620 3,630 2,628 12,958 IMCP 113 159 198 136 606 MARCO LIBRARY 1,685 2,251 1,828 1,006 6,770 MHCP 573 974 1,221 913 3,681 NCRP 1,295 1,737 1,268 930 5,230 NORTH COLLIER SERVICE CENTER 5,595 7,852 8,233 6,531 28,211 TAX COLLECTOR 3,998 4,539 4,182 3,208 15,927 VTCP 5,530 5,781 4,600 2,731 18,642 VYCP 1,341 2,193 4,403 906 8,843 TOTAL 30,458 39,074 36,439 23,340 129,311 FY 20 Q1 FY 20 Q2 FY 20 Q3 FY 20 Q4 FY 20 YE CENTRAL AVE LIBRARY 2,276 2,670 1,685 - 6,631 ELCP 1,487 1,857 - - 3,344 ENCP 2,619 3,598 586 - 6,803 EVERGLADES CITY 39 56 41 - 136 FREEDOM PARK 370 504 - - 874 GGCC 3,052 3,502 1,857 - 8,411 IMCP 123 122 - - 245 MARCO LIBRARY 1,683 2,422 408 - 4,513 MHCP 666 777 - - 1,443 NCRP 1,180 1,686 6 - 2,872 NORTH COLLIER SERVICE CENTER 4,550 9,392 1,961 - 15,903 TAX COLLECTOR 4,211 4,902 958 - 10,071 VTCP 4,310 5,202 2,252 - 11,764 VYCP 1,445 1,840 - - 3,285 TOTAL 28,011 38,530 9,754 - 76,295 BEACH PARKING PERMITS RESIDENT ISSUED 2019 BEACH PARKING PERMITS RESIDENT ISSUED 2020 BEACH PARKING PERMITS RESIDENT ISSUED 2018 Page 90 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1763 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY18 YE BAREFOOT ACCESS 17,950 23,713 13,310 7,267 62,240 BAREFOOT PRESERVE 60,372 105,723 52,070 28,001 246,166 CLAM PASS 7,262 55,517 23,604 14,220 100,603 CONNER PARK 2,983 14,405 3,781 1,994 23,163 SO MARCO 16,439 22,447 21,654 22,060 82,600 N GULF SHORE 5,899 7,680 6,850 4,514 24,943 SUGDEN 8,006 8,285 9,196 3,410 28,897 TIGERTAIL 29,338 71,990 37,322 31,903 170,553 VANDERBILT 73,359 100,291 71,848 43,305 288,803 Walkers/Bike Visitors 7,403 23,064 9,060 4,466 43,993 TOTAL BEACH USERS 229,011 433,115 248,695 161,140 1,071,961 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY19 YE BAREFOOT ACCESS 12,464 25,539 18,140 4,370 60,513 BAREFOOT PRESERVE 40,339 136,358 70,109 15,022 261,828 CLAM PASS 23,431 61,577 43,161 8,784 136,953 CONNER PARK 2,991 9,857 8,253 708 21,809 SO MARCO 18,352 23,686 24,323 8,229 74,590 N GULF SHORE 5,520 8,771 8,487 2,134 24,912 SUGDEN 7,010 17,278 12,328 3,101 39,717 TIGERTAIL 36,271 61,202 41,988 12,182 151,643 VANDERBILT 57,732 103,385 84,742 23,431 269,290 Walkers/Bike Visitors 10,265 30,505 11,090 1,749 53,609 TOTAL BEACH USERS 214,375 478,158 322,621 79,710 1,094,864 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY20 YE BAREFOOT ACCESS 11,111 20,752 6,381 - 38,244 BAREFOOT PRESERVE 43,046 98,878 22,800 - 164,724 CLAM PASS 21,322 53,969 13,210 - 88,501 CONNER PARK 2,926 10,800 1,793 - 15,519 SO MARCO 18,600 21,242 6,447 - 46,289 N GULF SHORE 2,561 7,800 2,470 - 12,831 SUGDEN 4,030 9,754 4,114 - 17,898 TIGERTAIL 29,964 54,843 14,858 - 99,665 VANDERBILT 59,270 88,665 30,926 - 178,861 Walkers/Bike Visitors 8,193 22,865 35,829 - 66,887 TOTAL BEACH USERS 201,023 389,568 138,828 - 729,419 Beach Users FY20 Beach Users FY18 Beach Users FY19 Page 91 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1764 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY18 YE Ann Olesky/LAKE TRAFFORD 1,202 2,644 999 70 4,915 BAYVIEW 12,149 13,697 11,075 2,431 39,352 CAXAMBAS 10,804 18,170 10,770 1,774 41,518 COCO 8,479 12,979 9,565 1,436 32,459 GOODLAND BOAT PARK 4,773 7,500 4,244 1,329 17,846 SR 951 4,651 4,147 5,286 2,134 16,218 PORT OF THE ISLANDS 4,786 6,158 3,340 955 15,239 TOTAL BOAT LAUNCH 46,844 65,295 45,279 10,129 167,547 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY19 YE Ann Olesky/LAKE TRAFFORD 1,395 - 1,502 492 3,389 BAYVIEW 9,633 13,670 15,800 4,387 43,490 CAXAMBAS 11,592 22,524 17,640 4,766 56,522 COCO 8,645 11,783 14,966 6,991 42,385 GOODLAND BOAT PARK 5,859 9,480 7,705 1,963 25,007 SR 951 5,162 7,818 9,047 2,618 24,645 PORT OF THE ISLANDS 5,919 10,270 7,713 2,374 26,276 TOTAL BOAT LAUNCH 48,205 75,545 74,373 23,591 221,714 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY20 YE Ann Olesky/LAKE TRAFFORD 1,401 3,312 878 - 5,591 BAYVIEW 10,176 15,691 10,927 - 36,794 CAXAMBAS 13,809 19,166 6,204 - 39,179 COCO 14,609 14,174 5,503 - 34,286 GOODLAND BOAT PARK 6,654 11,517 6,506 - 24,677 SR 951 5,601 10,276 8,976 - 24,853 PORT OF THE ISLANDS 6,577 8,942 5,270 - 20,789 TOTAL BOAT LAUNCH 58,827 83,078 44,264 - 186,169 Boat Launch Users FY19 Boat Launch Users FY18 Boat Launch Users FY20 Page 92 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1765 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY18 YE BAREFOOT ACCESS 8 34 10 2 54 BAREFOOT PRESERVE 6 12 5 1 24 CLAM PASS - 6 3 1 10 CONNER PARK - - - 1 1 SO MARCO 23 50 48 56 177 N GULF SHORE 6 6 3 1 16 SUGDEN - - - - - TIGERTAIL 3 2 3 - 8 VANDERBILT 4 17 7 1 29 TOTAL DAYS AT CAPACITY 50 127 79 63 319 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY19 YE BAREFOOT ACCESS 10 49 13 1 73 BAREFOOT PRESERVE 5 14 11 - 30 CLAM PASS 2 21 6 - 29 CONNER PARK 1 2 2 - 5 SO MARCO 29 71 64 47 211 N GULF SHORE 4 19 12 4 39 SUGDEN - - - - - TIGERTAIL 3 8 1 - 12 VANDERBILT 4 31 10 1 46 TOTAL DAYS AT CAPACITY 58 215 119 53 445 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY20 YE BAREFOOT ACCESS 10 18 3 - 31 BAREFOOT PRESERVE 4 25 3 - 32 CLAM PASS 5 22 - - 27 CONNER PARK - 1 1 - 2 SO MARCO 32 57 17 - 106 N GULF SHORE 5 22 9 - 36 SUGDEN - - - - - TIGERTAIL 5 7 - - 12 VANDERBILT 5 24 2 - 31 TOTAL DAYS AT CAPACITY 66 176 35 - 277 Days at Capacity FY 19 Days at Capacity FY 20 Days at Capacity FY 18 Page 93 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1766 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) FY 18 Q1 FY 18 Q2 FY 18 Q3 FY 18 Q4 FY 18 YE Aaron Lutz - 3 - - 3 Barefoot Beach 7 2 4 - 13 Bayview Park - - - - - Caxambas Park - - - - - Clam Pass 1 2 2 1 6 Cocohatchee River Park 6 94 184 - 284 Corkscrew Middle & Elem School 228 35 50 - 313 Cypress Palm Middle School - - - - - Eagle Lakes Community Park 32 266 203 213 714 East Naples Community Park 388 124 98 97 707 East Naples Middle School - - - - - Eden Park 23 32 24 12 91 Freedom Park - 1 - 4 5 Golden Gate Aquatic and Fitness - - - - - Golden Gate Community Center 271 368 357 292 1,288 Golden Gate Communuity Park 189 367 378 190 1,124 Golden Gate Middle School - - - - - Goodland Boat Park - - - - - Gulf Coast Community Park - - 6 - 6 Gulf Coast High School - - - - - Immokalee Airport Park 10 8 7 - 25 Immokalee Community Park 26 37 38 29 130 Immokalee High School - - - - - Immokalee South Park 17 20 17 13 67 Immokalee Sports Complex 9 12 1 - 22 Margood Harbor Park - - 1 - 1 Max Hasse Community Park 12 125 91 32 260 NCRP Admin - - - 1 1 NCRP Aquatic 19 1 17 5 42 NCRP Exhibit Hall 127 171 139 145 582 NCRP Pavilions 47 44 38 17 146 NCRP Rec Plex 38 63 80 52 233 NCRP Soccer 29 26 30 23 108 NCRP Soccer Pavilions - - - - - NCRP Softball 69 52 93 40 254 North Gulf Shore Access - - 1 - 1 Osceola Elementary School 18 60 88 36 202 Palmetto Elementary 72 22 18 13 125 Pelican Bay Community Park 53 12 6 - 71 Pepper Ranch 21 30 36 - 87 Sabal Palm Elementary 8 50 57 - 115 South Marco Beach Access 6 1 8 3 18 Starcher Pettey - - - - - Sugden Regional Park 33 41 88 42 204 Tigertail 1 2 - - 3 Tony Rosbourgh - - - - - Vanderbilt Beach 2 8 3 2 15 Veterans Community Park 331 586 524 293 1,734 Veterans Memorial 53 57 - 38 148 Vineyards Community Park 1,591 1,264 1,286 662 4,803 Total Facility Rentals 3,737 3,986 3,973 2,255 13,951 FEE-BASED FACILITY RENTALS 2018 Page 94 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1767 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) FY 19 Q1 FY 19 Q2 FY 19 Q3 FY 19 Q4 FY 19 YE Aaron Lutz - - 1 - 1 Barefoot Beach 2 - 5 - 7 Bayview Park - - - - - Caxambas Park - - - - - Clam Pass 3 3 5 - 11 Cocohatchee River Park 2 16 12 79 109 Corkscrew Middle & Elem School 23 26 32 14 95 Cypress Palm Middle School - - - - - Eagle Lakes Community Park 171 190 260 223 844 East Naples Community Park 203 100 38 25 366 East Naples Middle School - - - - - Eden Park 5 22 23 13 63 Freedom Park 3 - - - 3 Golden Gate Aquatic and Fitness - - - - - Golden Gate Community Center 302 366 284 252 1,204 Golden Gate Communuity Park 350 426 500 263 1,539 Golden Gate Middle School - - - - - Goodland Boat Park - 12 - - 12 Gordon River Greenway 1 - Gulf Coast Community Park - - - - - Gulf Coast High School - - - - - Immokalee Airport Park 18 7 6 8 39 Immokalee Community Park 42 39 53 66 200 Immokalee High School - - - - - Immokalee South Park 19 15 26 16 76 Immokalee Sports Complex 7 8 11 12 38 Margood Harbor Park 1 - - - 1 Max Hasse Community Park 82 120 94 70 366 NCRP Admin - 1 56 1 58 NCRP Aquatic 11 - 12 6 29 NCRP Exhibit Hall 184 224 76 138 622 NCRP Pavilions 9 29 32 13 83 NCRP Rec Plex 32 44 48 67 191 NCRP Soccer 30 57 100 180 367 NCRP Soccer Pavilions 33 14 - - 47 NCRP Softball 135 37 91 41 304 North Gulf Shore Access - - - 1 1 Osceola Elementary School 74 13 2 19 108 Palmetto Elementary 8 18 12 11 49 Pelican Bay Community Park 9 11 6 2 28 Pepper Ranch 40 41 11 - 92 Sabal Palm Elementary - 56 63 25 144 South Marco Beach Access 2 4 5 4 15 Starcher Pettey - - - 3 3 Sugden Regional Park 124 51 37 43 255 Tigertail 1 3 1 2 7 Tony Rosbourgh - - - - - Vanderbilt Beach 1 - 1 2 4 Veterans Community Park 623 568 318 221 1,730 Veterans Memorial 68 - - - 68 Vineyards Community Park 1,905 871 986 389 4,151 Total Facility Rentals 4,522 3,393 3,207 2,209 13,331 FEE-BASED FACILITY RENTALS 2019 Page 95 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1768 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) FY 20 Q1 FY 20 Q2 FY 20 Q3 FY 20 Q4 FY 20 YE Aaron Lutz - - - - - Barefoot Beach 6 3 - - 9 Bayview Park - - - - - Caxambas Park - - - - - Clam Pass 5 6 2 - 13 Cocohatchee River Park 35 12 - - 47 Corkscrew Middle & Elem School 28 88 46 - 162 Cypress Palm Middle School 1 - - - 1 Eagle Lakes Community Park 236 316 150 - 702 East Naples Community Park 271 127 13 - 411 East Naples Middle School - 2 1 - 3 Eden Park 21 24 - - 45 Freedom Park 2 4 - - 6 Golden Gate Aquatic and Fitness - - - - - Golden Gate Community Center 338 351 99 - 788 Golden Gate Communuity Park 413 398 155 - 966 Golden Gate Middle School - - - - - Goodland Boat Park - - - - - Gulf Coast Community Park - - - - - Gulf Coast High School - - - - - Immokalee Airport Park 13 5 - - 18 Immokalee Community Park 45 41 3 - 89 Immokalee High School - - - - - Immokalee South Park 18 19 - - 37 Immokalee Sports Complex 4 7 - - 11 Margood Harbor Park 8 4 - - 12 Max Hasse Community Park 117 132 72 - 321 NCRP Admin - 1 - - 1 NCRP Aquatic - - - - - NCRP Exhibit Hall 149 157 91 - 397 NCRP Pavilions 34 46 2 - 82 NCRP Rec Plex 33 45 1 - 79 NCRP Soccer 178 255 - - 433 NCRP Soccer Pavilions 27 - - - 27 NCRP Softball 86 12 2 - 100 North Gulf Shore Access 2 1 - - 3 Osceola Elementary School 75 83 60 - 218 Palmetto Elementary 5 14 - - 19 Pelican Bay Community Park 6 4 - - 10 Pepper Ranch 14 124 65 - 203 Sabal Palm Elementary 26 79 44 - 149 South Marco Beach Access 5 3 - - 8 Starcher Pettey - - - - - Sugden Regional Park 184 70 89 - 343 Tigertail 1 3 - - 4 Tony Rosbourgh - - - - - Vanderbilt Beach 1 - - - 1 Veterans Community Park 502 413 105 - 1,020 Veterans Memorial 57 53 40 - 150 Vineyards Community Park 1,671 552 399 - 2,622 Total Facility Rentals 4,617 3,454 1,439 - 9,510 FEE-BASED FACILITY RENTALS 2020 Page 96 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1769 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Site FY18 Q1 FY18 Q2 FY18 Q3 FY18 Q4 FY18 YE Corkscrew Elementary/Middle School 1,328 810 663 406 3,207 Eagle Lakes Community Park 754 794 425 493 2,466 East Naples Community Park 645 519 191 593 1,948 Eden Elementary School 650 600 126 354 1,730 Golden Gate Community Park - 1,011 756 - 1,767 Gulf Coast - 572 319 177 1,068 Immokalee Community Park 429 1,170 525 235 2,359 Immokalee Sports Complex 1,440 975 308 600 3,323 Max Hasse Community Park 2,129 288 264 167 2,848 Naples Park Field (Starcher Petty)184 238 190 100 712 North Collier Regional Park - Soccer 855 810 758 285 2,707 North Collier Regional Park - Softball 807 1,725 1,408 738 4,677 Osceola Elementary School 532 292 412 280 1,516 Palmetto Elementary School 355 390 190 123 1,058 Sabal Palm Elementary School 1,661 1,080 887 518 4,146 Tony Rosbough 260 780 522 168 1,730 Veterans CP 969 1,454 996 852 4,271 Veterans Memorial 338 408 140 210 1,096 Vineyards CP 3,990 4,355 4,121 1,235 13,701 Totals 17,325 18,270 13,199 7,534 56,328 Site FY19 Q1 FY19 Q2 FY19 Q3 FY19 Q4 FY19 YE Corkscrew Elementary/Middle School 336 462 517 530 1,845 Eagle Lakes Community Park 130 842 644 509 2,125 East Naples Community Park 434 688 445 263 1,830 Eden Elementary School 630 257 575 - 1,462 Golden Gate Community Park 812 864 1,123 302 3,100 Gulf Coast 348 660 445 45 1,498 Immokalee Community Park - 318 186 - 503 Immokalee Sports Complex 742 741 173 - 1,656 Max Hasse Community Park 322 194 497 200 1,213 Naples Park Field (Starcher Petty)300 370 180 6 856 North Collier Regional Park - Soccer 650 462 934 968 3,013 North Collier Regional Park - Softball 1,291 1,121 1,109 574 4,094 Osceola Elementary School 468 520 360 60 1,408 Palmetto Elementary School 251 200 193 - 644 Sabal Palm Elementary School 960 851 781 560 3,152 Tony Rosbough 160 160 100 - 420 Veterans CP 1,400 950 1,100 540 3,990 Veterans Memorial - 340 40 80 460 Vineyards CP 3,838 2,558 3,099 413 9,908 Totals 13,071 12,556 12,499 5,050 43,175 Field Usage Hours FY19 Field Usage Hours FY18 Page 97 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1770 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Site FY20 Q1 FY20 Q2 FY20 Q3 FY20 Q4 FY20 YE Corkscrew Elementary/Middle School 544 - - - 544 Eagle Lakes Community Park 504 - - - 504 East Naples Community Park 408 - - - 408 Eden Elementary School - - - - - Golden Gate Community Park 820 778 123 - 1,722 Gulf Coast 200 - - - 200 Immokalee Community Park - - - - - Immokalee Sports Complex - - - - - Max Hasse Community Park 320 - - - 320 Naples Park Field (Starcher Petty)80 140 - - 220 North Collier Regional Park - Soccer 1,119 - 578 - 1,697 North Collier Regional Park - Softball 1,056 163 98 - 1,317 Osceola Elementary School 240 290 - - 530 Palmetto Elementary School 175 - - - 175 Sabal Palm Elementary School 572 - - - 572 Tony Rosbough - - - - - Veterans CP 1,290 975 47 22 2,334 Veterans Memorial 160 200 - - 360 Vineyards CP 5,384 1,588 1,591 - 8,563 Totals 12,871 4,134 2,437 22 19,464 Field Usage Hours FY20 Page 98 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1771 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) FY 18 Q1 FY 18 Q2 FY 18 Q3 FY 18 Q4 FY 18 YE ELCP 188 389 189 189 955 ENCP (Pickleball)228 - - - 228 GGCP (Aquatic and Fitness)541 798 535 430 2,304 GGCC (Wheels)110 166 55 61 392 Home Based - - - - - IMSC 673 1,228 913 804 3,618 MHCP 92 141 169 134 536 NCRP Aquatic (Sun-N-Fun)11 69 331 195 606 NCRP Rec Plex 576 956 708 549 2,789 Payroll Deduction 166 148 175 165 654 VTCP (Pickleball)139 508 89 74 810 Total Memberships Sold 2,724 4,403 3,164 2,601 12,892 FY 19 Q1 FY 19 Q2 FY 19 Q3 FY 19 Q4 FY 19 YE ELCP 240 511 206 170 1,127 ENCP (Pickleball)- - - - - GGCP (Aquatic and Fitness)576 766 414 284 2,040 GGCC (Wheels)45 94 106 98 343 Home Based - - - - - IMSC 886 1,074 962 923 3,845 MHCP 129 140 118 158 545 NCRP Aquatic (Sun-N-Fun)57 69 416 162 704 NCRP Rec Plex 498 994 498 591 2,581 Payroll Deduction 158 199 309 196 862 VTCP (Pickleball)179 - - - 179 Total Memberships Sold 2,768 3,847 3,029 2,582 12,226 FY 20 Q1 FY 20 Q2 FY 20 Q3 FY 20 Q4 FY 20 YE ELCP 287 385 - - 672 ENCP (Pickleball)- - - - - GGCP (Aquatic and Fitness)353 417 6 - 776 GGCC (Wheels)85 117 1 - 203 Home Based - - - - - IMSC 852 812 - - 1,664 MHCP 153 132 - - 285 NCRP Aquatic (Sun-N-Fun)54 - - - 54 NCRP Rec Plex 593 764 (5) - 1,352 Payroll Deduction 152 147 2 - 301 VTCP (Pickleball)- - - - - Total Memberships Sold 2,529 2,774 4 - 5,307 MEMBERSHIPS SOLD FY 2019 MEMBERSHIPS SOLD FY 2020 MEMBERSHIPS SOLD FY 2018 Page 99 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1772 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) FY 18 Q1 FY 18 Q2 FY 18 Q3 FY 18 Q4 FY 18 YE ELCP 10,443 21,717 22,761 24,993 79,914 ENCP 81,133 164,671 285,294 18,547 549,645 GGCC 40,369 37,677 34,246 8,681 120,973 GGCP 18,469 17,790 19,196 6,325 61,780 IMCP 17,974 20,741 20,550 18,100 77,365 IMSC 28,101 23,568 37,856 29,315 118,840 IMSP 6,681 6,347 9,441 10,199 32,668 MHCP 17,494 15,698 17,611 7,566 58,369 NCRP 80,910 105,975 83,129 46,020 316,034 VTCP 7,196 14,098 43,085 17,253 81,632 VYCP 26,759 16,634 19,397 8,645 71,435 TOTAL PARK VISITORS 335,529 444,916 592,566 195,644 1,568,655 FY 19 Q1 FY 19 Q2 FY 19 Q3 FY 19 Q4 FY 19 YE ELCP 23,282 28,887 11,299 24,288 87,756 ENCP 80,839 154,173 130,833 52,049 417,894 GGCC 41,288 36,010 29,746 29,688 136,732 GGCP 16,682 19,065 19,311 15,984 71,042 IMCP 20,658 23,442 22,366 16,665 83,131 IMSC 21,955 30,012 29,353 32,604 113,924 IMSP 6,267 5,830 8,387 4,590 25,074 MHCP 16,176 17,465 34,805 27,223 95,669 NCRP 133,736 131,029 123,770 105,440 493,975 VTCP 35,335 65,851 36,281 44,028 181,495 VYCP 37,151 33,536 31,946 24,746 127,379 TOTAL PARK VISITORS 433,369 545,300 478,097 377,305 1,834,071 FY 20 Q1 FY 20 Q2 FY 20 Q3 FY 20 Q4 FY 20 YE ELCP 29,184 30,259 1,116 - 60,559 ENCP 104,921 115,790 35,768 - 256,479 GGCC 28,390 26,163 13,272 - 67,825 GGCP 15,622 13,483 5,494 - 34,599 IMCP 34,360 40,541 24,189 - 99,090 IMSC 73,385 228,799 4,764 - 306,948 IMSP 14,261 14,856 2,177 - 31,294 MHCP 25,253 18,377 15,141 - 58,771 NCRP 92,351 140,492 12,281 - 245,124 VTCP 54,256 34,392 34,614 - 123,262 VYCP 31,676 22,114 26,580 - 80,370 TOTAL PARK VISITORS 503,658 685,267 175,396 - 1,364,321 PARK VISITORS 2019 PARK VISITORS 2020 PARK VISITORS 2018 Page 100 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1773 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) FY 18 Q1 FY 18 Q2 FY 18 Q3 FY 18 Q4 FY 18 YE Adaptive Programming 18 16 - 1 35 Aquatic 8 179 472 245 904 Athletics 464 956 333 630 2,383 Camps 154 140 3,674 1,515 5,483 Childcare 475 568 282 529 1,854 Cultural Arts 41 22 8 19 90 Dance 156 197 196 139 688 Educational 34 95 235 10 374 Extreme Sports 1 2 58 - 61 Fitness 1 8 26 8 43 Martial Arts 245 276 271 269 1,061 Nature/Science 9 5 4 12 30 Social 2 15 1 2 20 Special Events 418 814 337 298 1,867 Water Sports 21 21 2 16 60 Total by Type 2,047 3,314 5,899 3,693 14,953 FY 19 Q1 FY 19 Q2 FY 19 Q3 FY 19 Q4 FY 19 YE Adaptive Programming 22 26 - 54 102 Aquatic 42 216 688 192 1,138 Athletics 476 1,049 334 538 2,397 Camps 173 1,028 2,171 1,387 4,759 Childcare 476 550 321 486 1,833 Cultural Arts 52 32 15 21 120 Dance 185 198 144 122 649 Educational 64 122 232 5 423 Extreme Sports - 15 13 6 34 Fitness 2 65 20 6 93 Martial Arts 265 306 303 273 1,147 Nature/Science 8 6 10 16 40 Social 12 25 3 4 44 Special Events 524 467 380 316 1,687 Water Sports 19 52 7 20 98 Total by Type 2,320 4,157 4,641 3,446 14,564 FY 20 Q1 FY 20 Q2 FY 20 Q3 FY 20 Q4 FY 20 YE Adaptive Programming 52 38 - - 90 Aquatic 81 120 34 - 235 Athletics 271 690 18 - 979 Camps 388 626 293 - 1,307 Childcare 470 564 25 - 1,059 Cultural Arts 40 10 - - 50 Dance 161 184 7 - 352 Educational 11 39 6 - 56 Extreme Sports - 20 3 - 23 Fitness 10 1 - - 11 Martial Arts 245 207 12 - 464 Nature/Science 7 16 6 - 29 Social 11 53 - - 64 Special Events 460 241 4 - 705 Water Sports 13 246 35 - 294 Total by Type 2,220 3,055 443 - 5,718 FEE-BASED PROGRAM REGISTRATIONS 2019 FEE-BASED PROGRAM REGISTRATIONS 2020 FEE-BASED PROGRAM REGISTRATIONS 2018 Page 101 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1774 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY18 YE PARK SITES VISITED 6,876 7,229 7,194 6,852 28,151 PERSONAL CONTACTS 18,683 24,523 20,201 15,273 78,680 INTERPRETIVE PROJECTS 3 29 18 9 59 INTERPRETIVE PARTICIPANTS 354 179 264 409 1,206 VERBAL WARNINGS 1,880 2,800 2,041 1,815 8,536 WRITTEN WARNINGS 259 431 298 369 1,357 PARKING CITATIONS 311 322 212 200 1,045 ORIDNANCE CITATIONS 4 1 3 5 13 TRESPASS WARNINGS 1 1 1 5 8 COURT APPEARANCES 3 3 3 1 10 RANGER BIKE HOURS - 3 - - 3 EXOTIC REMOVAL 84 52 12 12 160 WILDLIFE RESCUES 2 3 3 3 11 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY19 YE PARK SITES VISITED 6,818 7,381 6,534 2,253 22,986 PERSONAL CONTACTS 18,695 23,923 17,597 6,897 67,112 INTERPRETIVE PROJECTS 3 28 325 7 363 INTERPRETIVE PARTICIPANTS 359 479 1,067 255 2,160 VERBAL WARNINGS 1,709 2,133 1,827 1,460 7,129 WRITTEN WARNINGS 335 449 270 58 1,112 PARKING CITATIONS 297 414 245 62 1,018 ORIDNANCE CITATIONS 2 7 1 - 10 TRESPASS WARNINGS 7 - 1 1 9 COURT APPEARANCES 2 7 2 - 11 RANGER BIKE HOURS - - - - - EXOTIC REMOVAL 36 10 12 - 58 WILDLIFE RESCUES 3 4 7 - 14 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY20 YE PARK SITES VISITED 5,824 6,470 4,603 - 16,897 PERSONAL CONTACTS 14,067 21,771 7,581 - 43,419 INTERPRETIVE PROJECTS 6 21 - - 27 INTERPRETIVE PARTICIPANTS 119 232 - - 351 VERBAL WARNINGS 1,250 3,530 1,964 - 6,744 WRITTEN WARNINGS 153 438 64 - 655 PARKING CITATIONS 219 249 56 - 524 ORIDNANCE CITATIONS 1 2 - - 3 TRESPASS WARNINGS 2 3 1 - 6 COURT APPEARANCES 2 1 - - 3 RANGER BIKE HOURS - - 7 - 7 EXOTIC REMOVAL - 12 10 - 22 WILDLIFE RESCUES 4 4 - - 8 Ranger Information FY19 Ranger Information FY20 Ranger Information FY18 Page 102 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1775 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) SUN-N-FUN LAGOON ADMISSIONS 2018 FY 18 Q1 FY 18 Q2 FY18 Q3 FY 18 Q4 FY 18 YE Disabled Veterans Discount 1 24 99 106 230 SNF 3 Years and Under 74 895 3,653 4,866 9,488 SNF CCSO Events - - - - - SNF Group Over 48 Inches - 64 2,920 4,590 7,574 SNF Group Under 48 Inches - 1 184 719 904 SNF Over 48 Inches 1,105 6,788 16,581 27,274 51,748 SNF Party Over 48 in - - 98 - 98 SNF Party Under 48 in - - - - - SNF Private Dive - - - - - SNF Private Lessons - - - - - SNF Promo Day Passes 21 53 121 385 580 SNF Raincheck Redeem Over 48 Inches 4 - 630 2,928 3,562 SNF Raincheck Redeem Under 48 Inches - - 67 263 330 SNF Rentals - - 10,335 - 10,335 SNF Resident Over 48 Inches 188 2,742 12,143 15,220 30,293 SNF School Board Adult - - 870 - 870 SNF School Lunch Program - - - - - SNF Senior Admission 88 1,116 1,904 2,818 5,926 SNF Special Event Free - - 304 - 304 SNF Swim Team - - - - - SNF Under 48 Inches 121 1,150 3,683 4,998 9,952 SNF Veterans Discount 1 89 213 384 687 Collier Camps - - 1,131 869 2,000 Drop Ins 2 11 40 35 88 Memberships Scans 113 862 4,053 65,455 70,483 Total Admissions 1,718 13,795 59,029 130,910 205,452 SUN-N-FUN LAGOON ADMISSIONS 2019 FY 19 Q1 FY 19 Q2 FY19 Q3 FY 19 Q4 FY 19 YE Disabled Veterans Discount - - 131 119 250 SNF 3 Years and Under - 4 2,999 2,947 5,950 SNF CCSO Events - - - - - SNF Group Over 48 Inches 65 3,915 1,466 3,534 8,980 SNF Group Under 48 Inches 24 378 61 600 1,063 SNF Over 48 Inches - - 13,721 15,897 29,618 SNF Party Over 48 in - - - - - SNF Party Under 48 in - - - - - SNF Private Dive - - - 1 1 SNF Private Lessons - - - 5 5 SNF Promo Day Passes - 26 86 97 209 SNF Raincheck Redeem Over 48 Inches - 6 116 1,639 1,761 SNF Raincheck Redeem Under 48 Inches - 1,103 12 160 1,275 SNF Rentals - - 4,180 2,795 6,975 SNF Resident Over 48 Inches - - 10,055 10,751 20,806 SNF School Board Adult - - 106 172 278 SNF School Lunch Program - - - - - SNF Senior Admission - - 1,496 1,731 3,227 SNF Special Event Free - 12,571 4,659 - 17,230 SNF Swim Team - - - - - SNF Under 48 Inches - - 2,616 2,767 5,383 SNF Veterans Discount - - 1,246 228 1,474 Collier Camps - - 446 1,858 2,304 Drop Ins - 38 114 85 237 Memberships Scans 1,043 2,241 4,420 45,386 53,090 Total Admissions 1,132 20,282 47,930 90,772 160,116 Page 103 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1776 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) SUN-N-FUN LAGOON ADMISSIONS 2020 FY 20 Q1 FY 20 Q2 FY20 Q3 FY 20 Q4 FY 20 YE Disabled Veterans Discount - - - - - SNF 3 Years and Under - 4 - - 4 SNF CCSO Events - - - - - SNF Group Over 48 Inches - 129 - - 129 SNF Group Under 48 Inches 214 107 - - 321 SNF Over 48 Inches - - - - - SNF Party Over 48 in - - - - - SNF Party Under 48 in - 150 - - 150 SNF Private Dive - - - - - SNF Private Lessons - 2 - - 2 SNF Promo Day Passes - 125 - - 125 SNF Raincheck Redeem Over 48 Inches - 3 - - 3 SNF Raincheck Redeem Under 48 Inches 1 1 - - 2 SNF Rentals - - - - - SNF Resident Over 48 Inches - - - - - SNF School Board Adult - - - - - SNF School Lunch Program - - - - - SNF Senior Admission - - - - - SNF Special Event Free 137 2,983 - - 3,120 SNF Swim Team - - - - - SNF Under 48 Inches - - - - - SNF Veterans Discount - - - - - Collier Camps - - - - - Drop Ins 25 283 - - 308 Memberships Scans 1,007 1,513 - - 2,520 Total Admissions 1,384 5,300 - - 6,684 Page 104 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1777 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY18 YE BAREFOOT BCH PRESERVE 1,542 4,828 2,783 1,956 11,109 CLAM PASS PARK - 2,148 946 353 3,447 TIGERTAIL BEACH 1,161 1,459 1,210 986 4,816 VANDERBILT BEACH 651 712 680 646 2,689 TOTAL TURNAROUNDS 3,354 9,147 5,619 3,941 22,061 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY19 YE BAREFOOT BCH PRESERVE 1,233 3,755 1,817 525 7,330 CLAM PASS PARK 729 2,473 1,337 257 4,796 TIGERTAIL BEACH 1,063 1,770 1,242 279 4,354 VANDERBILT BEACH 522 480 458 150 1,610 TOTAL TURNAROUNDS 3,547 8,478 4,854 1,211 18,090 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY20 YE BAREFOOT BCH PRESERVE 1,252 4,503 714 - 6,469 CLAM PASS PARK 667 2,298 733 - 3,698 TIGERTAIL BEACH 716 1,432 372 - 2,520 VANDERBILT BEACH 546 564 677 - 1,787 TOTAL TURNAROUNDS 3,181 8,797 2,496 - 14,474 Turnarounds FY19 Turnarounds FY20 Turnarounds FY18 Page 105 of 105 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 1778 Attachment: 2020 AUIR part 2 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1779 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1780 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Updates and Amendments to the Capital Improvement Element The Annual Update and Inventory Report includes updates to the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan needed to eliminate existing deficiencies, replace obsolete or worn out facilities, and make available adequate facilities for future growth. These updates include the two following tables and two Collier County Public School District planning documents as provided for in Policy 4.2 of the Capital Improvement Element. What follows as “Exhibit A” is the Schedule of Capital Improvements for the next five year period [Fiscal years 2021 through 2025]. Exhibit A is a component of the Capital Improvement Element and indicates the County’s needs for arterial and collector roads and bridge facilities, parks and recreation facilities, stormwater management system, potable water system, solid waste disposal facilities, and wastewater collection and treatment system improvements – all Category “A” facilities subject to concurrency. Public schools are also Category “A” facilities, and planning for public schools over the next five year period is provided by the financially feasible five-year project programming in the Collier County Public School District Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2019 through 2038 that is incorporated by reference in the Capital Improvement Element. School planning for this period is also provided by the Collier County Public School District Facilities Work Program, as incorporated into the Capital Improvement Element as data and analysis. What follows as “Appendix H” is the Schedule of Capital Improvements for the future five year period [Fiscal years 2026 through 2030]. Appendix H supplements the Capital Improvement Element for long term facilities planning of the same Category “A” facilities. Long term planning for public schools is provided by the Collier County Public School District Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2019 through 2038. Each Schedule of Capital Improvements table represents the revenue sources and expenditures for Category “A” public facilities to maintain the levels of service standards established by the Capital Improvement Element. These updated tables, together with updated references to School District documents and their incorporation into the Capital Improvement Element as data and analysis, constitute the amendments to the Capital Improvement Element. Page 3 of 18 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1781 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Schedule of Capital Improvements Tables: 2020 Amendments EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT SCHEDULE NOTES FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL 60144 Oil Well Rd - Everglades Blvd to Oil Well Grade Advanced Construction $2,000,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $3,200,000 60168 Vanderbilt Beach Rd - Collier Blvd to 16th St R/M/D/A 21, R 22, C 23 $600,000 $94,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $95,300,000 60229 Wilson Blvd - Golden Gate Blvd to Immokalee Rd A 21, D/R 22, C 24 $7,100,000 $0 $0 $20,500,000 $0 $27,600,000 60129 Wilson / Benfield Extension - Lord's Way to City Gate N S/C 21, R/A 22-25 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $9,000,000 60215 Triangle Blvd / Price St R 21, R/C 22 $6,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,800,000 60190 Airport Rd - Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Immokalee Rd D/R 21, C/M 22, 23 $3,100,000 $14,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $17,900,000 66066 11 Bridge Replacements D/C/M 21, 22 $33,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,100,000 60201 Pine Ridge Rd - Livingston Blvd to I-75 R 21, D 22, D/C/M 23 $1,500,000 $0 $42,500,000 $0 $0 $44,000,000 60212 New Golden Gate Bridges (10)D/C 22 - 25 $0 $15,500,000 $6,100,000 $27,000,000 $8,600,000 $57,200,000 33524 Tiger Grant C 21 $13,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,000,000 70167 Business Center (City Gate)A 21, C 23 $10,500,000 $5,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $16,000,000 68056 Collier Blvd (Green to GG Main Canal)R/D/C 23 $0 $0 $38,200,000 $0 $0 $38,200,000 60065 Randall Blvd - Immokalee Rd to Oil Well R 22, D 24 $250,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $3,250,000 60241 16th Street NE Bridge D/C/M 21 $11,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,800,000 TBD Goodlette Rd (Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Immokalee Rd)D 23, A 24, 25 $0 $0 $2,309,000 $634,000 $9,366,000 $12,309,000 TBD Green Blvd (Santa Barbara Blvd to Sunshine)S 23 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000 TBD Vanderbilt Beach Rd - 16th to Everglades Blvd D/R/M 22, R/A 23, 24 $0 $2,800,000 $11,250,000 $5,000,000 $0 $19,050,000 60228 Sidewalks D 21, D/C 22, 23, C 24, 25 $1,416,000 $2,281,000 $1,251,000 $4,895,000 $0 $9,843,000 TBD Immokalee Rd - Livingston to Logan S/A 24 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 60073 Davis Mystic DCA Reimb $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 60144 Oil Well Rd (Everglades to Oil Well Grade)A 21-25 $2,000,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $3,200,000 TBD Poinciana Professional Park C 23 $0 $0 $300,000 $1,600,000 $0 $300,000 60198a Veterans Memorial PH I & PH 2 R 21, D/A/C 22, R/D 23, C/M 24 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 60198b Veterans Memorial PH II HS to US 41 R 21, D/A/C 22, R/D 23, C/M 24 $1,000,000 $2,700,000 $13,400,000 $0 $0 $17,100,000 60199 Vanderbilt Beach Rd - US 41 to E of Goodlette D 21, D/C 25 $0 $0 $0 $13,500,000 $13,500,000 60147 Randall/Immokalee Road Intersection D/R 21, C/M 23 $2,500,000 $0 $12,600,000 $0 $0 $15,100,000 60219 Whippoorwill C 21-22 $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 60229 Wilson Blvd - GG Blvd to Immokalee Rd A 21, D/R 212, 23, C 24 $7,100,000 $0 $0 $20,500,000 $0 $27,600,000 TBD Santa Barbara/Logan turnlanes D 24, C 25 $0 $0 $0 $879,000 $7,879,000 $8,758,000 Sbttl Several Shoulder Widenings/Intersection Improvements $2,242,000 $3,000,000 $1,600,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,842,000 Sbttl Operations Improvements/Programs $15,804,000 $0 $17,625,000 $17,625,000 $12,925,000 $63,979,000 60085 TIS Reviews $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,250,000 60109 Planning Consulting $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,500,000 60163 Traffic Studies $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,500,000 Impact Fee Refunds $0 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,000,000 Debt Service Payments $13,317,000 $13,131,000 $13,136,000 $13,576,000 $0 $53,160,000 $153,379,000 $157,312,000 $163,671,000 $121,109,000 $57,170,000 $653,634,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL IF - Impact Fees / COA Revenue $15,460,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $77,460,000 Unfunded Needs $0 $0 $56,637,000 $43,500,000 $0 $100,137,000 GA - Gas Tax Revenue $23,052,000 $23,500,000 $23,750,000 $24,000,000 $24,250,000 $118,552,000 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $19,434,000 $4,928,000 $9,800,000 $0 $6,806,000 $40,968,000 CF - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $534,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $534,000 GF - General Fund 001 $9,067,000 $9,389,000 $9,389,000 $9,389,000 $9,389,000 $46,623,000 Sales Tax $22,782,000 $95,781,000 $35,851,000 $36,429,000 $0 $190,843,000 IN - Interest Revenue - Fund 313 Gas Tax & Impact Fees $2,245,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $5,245,000 CF - Carry Forward - 313-310 Impact Fees $59,834,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $59,834,000 REIM - Expected FEMA Reimbursement $0 $8,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,500,000 TR - MSTU General Fund 111 Transfers $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $15,000,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)($1,962,000)($2,025,000)($2,025,000)($2,025,000)($2,025,000)($10,062,000) REVENUE TOTAL $153,446,000 $159,573,000 $152,902,000 $130,793,000 $56,920,000 $653,634,000 CUMMULATIVE FOR FY22 CAPITAL FUNDING $27,801,000 $15,637,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR ROADS AND BRIDGE PROJECTS ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR ROADS AND BRIDGE PROJECT TOTALS I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\04 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNLPage 4 of 189.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1782 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Schedule of Capital Improvements Tables: 2020 Amendments EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL Big Corkscrew Park Equipmnt $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Big Corkscrew Park $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fund 346 Debt Service (2011 Bond)$2,824,529 $2,818,329 $2,820,429 $2,828,829 $2,857,929 $14,150,045 Fund 346 Debt Service (2013 Bond)$123,471 $123,471 $123,471 $123,471 $3,421,271 $3,915,155 Fund 346 Debt Service (2019 Loan)$765,100 $768,900 $2,919,000 $2,933,300 $4,704,600 $12,090,900 PARKS & RECREATION FACILITIES PROJECT TOTALS $3,713,100 $3,710,700 $5,862,900 $5,885,600 $10,983,800 $30,156,100 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL IF - Impact Fees / COA Revenue $10,575,000 $8,630,200 $8,788,300 $8,949,200 $9,093,900 $43,936,600 DIF - Deferred Impact Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 IN - Interest / Misc.$512,000 $512,000 $512,000 $512,000 $512,000 $2,560,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CF - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $10,835,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,835,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GF - General Fund 001 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE TOTAL $21,922,400 $9,142,200 $9,300,300 $9,461,200 $9,605,900 $57,332,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law) TR - Added Value through Commitments, Leases & Transfers SCHEDULE NOTES PARKS & RECREATION FACILITIES PROJECTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NOTE: All Community Park Land and Regional Park Land transactions are being facilitated through interdepartmental transfers exchanging land holdings for park lands, or using other methods not involving expenditure of capital funds. These transactions represent changes to the value of land holdings only. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\04 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNLPage 5 of 189.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1783 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Schedule of Capital Improvements Tables: 2020 Amendments EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL Countywide Programs, Planning & Maintenance $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $2,000,000 Infrastructure & Capacity Projects $25,005,000 $47,800,000 $33,600,000 $29,850,000 $18,850,000 $155,105,000 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $25,405,000 $48,200,000 $34,000,000 $30,250,000 $19,250,000 $157,105,000 Stormwater Management Operating $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Debt Service / Reserves $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS $25,405,000 $48,200,000 $34,000,000 $30,250,000 $19,250,000 $157,105,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GF - New Budget from Fund (310)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Debt Funding $14,402,000 $40,159,000 $5,439,000 $0 $0 $60,000,000 Unmet Funding Needs $0 $0 $20,520,000 $22,209,000 $11,209,000 $53,938,000 CF - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $2,919,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,919,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)($5,000)($3,000)($3,000)($3,000)($3,000)($17,000) IN - Interest Revenue - misc.$95,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $295,000 GF - New Budget from Fund (101)$4,869,000 $4,869,000 $4,869,000 $4,869,000 $4,869,000 $24,345,000 GF - New Budget from Fund (111)$3,125,000 $3,125,000 $3,125,000 $3,125,000 $3,125,000 $15,625,000 REVENUE TOTAL $25,405,000 $48,200,000 $34,000,000 $30,250,000 $19,250,000 $157,105,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE NOTES I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\04 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNLPage 6 of 189.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1784 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Schedule of Capital Improvements Tables: 2020 Amendments EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL Debt Service $11,443,500 $10,849,500 $9,053,000 $9,050,500 $8,767,000 $49,163,500 Expansion Related Projects $27,725,000 $18,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $45,725,000 Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $30,000,000 $29,335,000 $28,605,000 $29,535,000 $28,085,000 $145,560,000 Departmental Capital $740,000 $755,000 $770,000 $785,000 $801,000 $3,851,000 Reserve for Contingencies ‒ Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $3,000,000 $2,934,000 $2,861,000 $2,954,000 $2,809,000 $14,558,000 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $72,908,500 $61,873,500 $41,289,000 $42,324,500 $40,462,000 $258,857,500 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL WIF - Water System Development Fees / Impact Fees $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $32,000,000 RR - Reserve Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 B - Bond Proceeds $27,725,000 $18,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $45,725,000 LOC - Commercial Paper $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 WCA - Water Capital Account $740,000 $755,000 $770,000 $785,000 $801,000 $3,851,000 REV - Rate Revenue $38,043,500 $36,718,500 $34,119,000 $35,139,500 $33,261,000 $177,281,500 REVENUE TOTAL $72,908,500 $61,873,500 $41,289,000 $42,324,500 $40,462,000 $258,857,500 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE NOTES DATA SOURCES: -Expansion Related and Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects: FY 2021 is obtained from the 2021 Proposed Budget. FY 2022 to FY 2025 are from the FY 2019 Impact Fee Rate Study. -Department Capital: FY 2021 is obtained from the 2021 Proposed Budget, split 50/50 between Water and Wastewater. FY 2022 to FY 2025 are 2% increases over each fiscal year (pursuant to CPI adjustments per current Board policy). -Debt Service: All years are obtained from the Collier County Water and Sewer District Financial Statements and Other Reports, Summary of Debt Service requirements to maturity. Total Debt Service amount is split 50/50 between Water and Wastewater. -Reserve for Contingencies --Replacement and Rehabilitation Projects: NOTE: Collier County has adopted a two-year Concurrency Management System. Figures provided for years three, four and five of this Schedule of Capital Improvements are not part of the Concurrency Management System but must be financially feasible with a dedicated revenue source or an alternative revenue source if the dedicated revenue source is not realized. Revenue sources are estimates only; both the mix of sources and amounts will change when a rate study is completed. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\04 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNLPage 7 of 189.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1785 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Schedule of Capital Improvements Tables: 2020 Amendments EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT NOTES FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL TBD County Landfill Cell Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL LTF - Landfill Tipping Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROJECTS SCHEDULE NOTES SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROJECT TOTALS * Pursuant to the Landfill Operating Agreement (LOA) with Waste Management, Inc. of Florida (WMIF), landfill cell construction is scheduled and guaranteed by WMIF over the life of the Collier County Landfill. Collier County landfill expansion costs are paid for by WMIF through agreed upon Collier County landfill tipping fees. By contract under the LOA, WMIF will construct any future required cells. Landfill cells vary in size and disposal capacity. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\04 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNLPage 8 of 189.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1786 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Schedule of Capital Improvements Tables: 2020 Amendments EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 WASTEWATER COLLECTION & TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL Debt Service (CAFR)$11,443,500 $10,849,500 $9,053,000 $9,050,500 $8,767,000 $49,163,500 Expansion Related Projects $25,225,000 $0 $103,000,000 $0 $0 $128,225,000 Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $36,300,000 $35,750,000 $28,675,000 $29,695,000 $29,785,000 $160,205,000 Departmental Capital $740,000 $755,000 $770,000 $785,000 $801,000 $3,851,000 Reserve for Contingencies ‒ Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $3,630,000 $3,575,000 $2,868,000 $2,970,000 $2,979,000 $16,022,000 WASTEWATER COLLECTION & TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $77,338,500 $50,929,500 $144,366,000 $42,500,500 $42,332,000 $357,466,500 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 TOTAL SIF - Wastewater System Development Fees / Impact Fees $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $33,000,000 RR - Reserve Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 B - Bond Proceeds $25,225,000 $0 $103,000,000 $0 $0 $128,225,000 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LOC - Commercial Paper, Additional Senior Lien $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SCA - Wastewater Capital Account - Transfers $740,000 $755,000 $770,000 $785,000 $801,000 $3,851,000 REV - Rate Revenue $44,773,500 $43,574,500 $33,996,000 $35,115,500 $34,931,000 $192,390,500 REVENUE TOTAL $77,338,500 $50,929,500 $144,366,000 $42,500,500 $42,332,000 $357,466,500 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE NOTES DATA SOURCES: -Expansion Related and Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects : FY 2021 is obtained from the 2021 Proposed Budget. FY 2022 to FY 2025 are estimated project costs. -Department Capital: FY 2021 is obtained from the 2021 Proposed Budget, split 50/50 between Water and Wastewater. FY 2022 to FY 2025 are 2% increases over each fiscal year (pursuant to CPI adjustments per current Board policy). -Debt Service: All years are obtained from the Collier County Water and Sewer District Financial Statements and Other Reports, Summary of Debt Service Requirements to maturity. Total Debt Service amount is split 50/50 between Water and Wastewater. -Reserve for Contingencies --Replacement and Rehabilitation Projects: NOTE: Collier County has adopted a two-year Concurrency Management System. Figures provided for years three, four and five of this Schedule of Capital Improvements are not part of the Concurrency Management System but must be financially feasible with a dedicated revenue source or an alternative revenue source if the dedicated revenue source is not realizedRevenue sources are estimates only; both the mix of sources and amounts will change when a rate study is conducted. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\04 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNLPage 9 of 189.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1787 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS COST AND REVENUE SUMMARY TABLE FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR ROADS AND BRIDGE PROJECTS Revenues:IF - Impact Fees / COA Revenue $77,460,000 Unfunded Needs $100,137,000 GA - Gas Tax Revenue $118,552,000 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $40,968,000 AC - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $534,000 GF - General Fund (001)$46,623,000 Supplemental OMB Funding $190,843,000 IN - Interest Revenue - Fund 313 Gas Tax & Impact Fees $5,245,000 TR - MSTU General Fund 111 Transfers $15,000,000 CF - Carry Forward - 313-310 Impact Fees $59,834,000 REIM - Expected FEMA Reimbursement $8,500,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)-$10,062,000 $653,634,000 Less Expenditures:$653,634,000 $653,634,000 Balance $0 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECTS Revenues:WIF - Water System Development Fees/Impact Fees $32,000,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 B - Bond Proceeds $45,725,000 LOC - Commercial Paper 1 $0 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 WCA - Water Capital Account $3,851,000 REV - Rate Revenue $177,281,500 $258,857,500 Less Expenditures:$258,857,500 $258,857,500 Balance $0 WASTEWATER COLLECTION & TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS Revenues:SIF - Wastewater System Development Fees/Impact Fees $33,000,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 B - Bond Proceeds $128,225,000 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 LOC - Commercial Paper, Additional Senior Lien $0 SCA - Wastewater Capital Account, Transfers $3,851,000 REV - Rate Revenue $192,390,500 $357,466,500 Less Expenditures:$357,466,500 $357,466,500 Balance $0 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROJECTS Revenues:LTF - Landfill Tipping Fees $0 $0 Less Expenditures:$0 $0 Balance $0 Revenues:IF - Impact Fees $43,936,600 DIF - Deferred Impact Fees $0 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 IN - Interest $2,560,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 $10,835,400 $0 GF - General Fund (001)$0 $57,332,000 Less Expenditures:$30,156,100 $57,332,000 Balance $27,175,900 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS Revenues: GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 GF - New Budget from Fund (310)$0 Debt Funding $60,000,000 Unmet Funding Needs $53,938,000 $2,919,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)-$17,000 IN - Interest Revenue $295,000 GF - New Budget from Fund (101)$24,345,000 GF - New Budget from Fund (111)$15,625,000 $157,105,000 Less Expenditures:$157,105,000 $157,105,000 Balance $0 TOTAL PROJECTS $1,457,219,100 TOTAL REVENUE SOURCES $1,484,395,000 AC - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service TR - Added Value through Commitments, Leases & Transfers CF - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service The table below itemizes the types of public facilities and the sources of revenue. The "Revenue Amount" column contains the 5-Year amount of facility revenues. The right column is a calculation of expenses versus revenues for each type of public facility. All deficits are accumulated as a subtotal. The subtotal deficit is the source of additional revenue utilized by Collier County to fund the deficit in order to maintain the levels of service standards as referenced in the Capital Improvement Element. Revenue Amount PARKS & RECREATION FACILITIES PROJECTS Projects Revenue Sources Expenditure Total I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\04 CIE FY 21-25_20 AUIR CCPC FNL Page 10 of 18 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1788 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Page 11 of 18 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1789 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Capital Improvement Element - Appendix Table: 2020 Amendments APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROAD PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sbttl Operations Improvements/Programs $15,000,000 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 $75,000,000 Sbttl Transfers to Other Funds $12,500,000 $12,500,000 $12,500,000 $12,500,000 $12,500,000 $62,500,000 Impact Fee Refunds $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,250,000 Capacity Improvement Projects - All Phases $40,710,000 $40,710,000 $10,710,000 $10,710,000 $10,710,000 $113,550,000 Debt Service Payments $14,600,000 $14,600,000 $14,600,000 $14,600,000 $14,600,000 $73,000,000 ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROAD PROJECT TOTALS $83,060,000 $83,060,000 $53,060,000 $53,060,000 $53,060,000 $325,300,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL TX - Sales Tax $30,000,000 $30,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $60,000,000 IF - Impact Fees / COA Revenue $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $77,500,000 GA - Gas Tax Revenue $24,000,000 $24,000,000 $24,000,000 $24,000,000 $24,000,000 $120,000,000 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 AC - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TR - Transfers $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GF - General Fund (001) $12,560,000 $12,560,000 $12,560,000 $12,560,000 $12,560,000 $62,800,000 DC - Developer Contribution Agreements / Advanced Reimbursements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 IN - Interest - Fund 313 (Gas Tax & Interest Impact Fees)$1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE TOTAL $83,060,000 $83,060,000 $53,060,000 $53,060,000 $53,060,000 $325,300,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE NOTES I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\05 CIE FY 26-30_20 AUIR CCPC FNL CIE Appendix - 1Page 12 of 189.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1790 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Capital Improvement Element - Appendix Table: 2020 Amendments APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE $ VALUE PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES PROJECT TOTALS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL IF - Impact Fees / COA Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GF - General Fund (001) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SCHEDULE NOTES PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES PROJECTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NOTE: All Community Park Land and Regional Park Land transactions are being facilitated through interdepartmental transfers exchanging land holdings for park lands, or using other methods not involving expenditure of capital funds. These transactions represent changes to the value of land holdings only. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\05 CIE FY 26-30_20 AUIR CCPC FNL CIE Appendix - 2Page 13 of 189.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1791 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Capital Improvement Element - Appendix Table: 2020 Amendments APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL Stormwater Management System Projects $25,365,000 $25,365,000 $25,365,000 $25,365,000 $25,365,000 $126,825,000 Stormwater Management Operations & Reserves $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $175,000 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $127,000,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 AC - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CRA - Community Redevelopment Area / Municipal Service Taxing Unit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GF - General Fund (001) $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $127,000,000 REVENUE TOTAL $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $25,400,000 $127,000,000 SCHEDULE NOTES Continuous CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\05 CIE FY 26-30_20 AUIR CCPC FNL CIE Appendix - 3Page 14 of 189.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1792 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Capital Improvement Element - Appendix Table: 2020 Amendments APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL Expansion Related Projects $5,833,000 $0 $14,667,000 $37,400,000 $0 $57,900,000 Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $29,085,000 $27,685,000 $27,435,000 $26,335,000 $25,585,000 $136,125,000 Debt Service $7,990,000 $7,171,500 $6,947,500 $8,034,000 $7,310,000 $37,453,000 Departmental Capital $817,000 $833,000 $850,000 $867,000 $884,000 $4,251,000 Reserve for Contingencies - Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $2,909,000 $2,769,000 $2,744,000 $2,634,000 $2,559,000 $13,615,000 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $46,634,000 $38,458,500 $52,643,500 $75,270,000 $36,338,000 $249,344,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL WIF - Water System Development Fees $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $32,000,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 B - Bond Proceeds $0 $0 $14,667,000 $37,400,000 $0 $52,067,000 SRF - State Revolving Loan Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 WCA - Water Capital Account $817,000 $833,000 $850,000 $867,000 $884,000 $4,251,000 REV - Rate Revenue $39,417,000 $31,225,500 $30,726,500 $30,603,000 $29,054,000 $161,026,000 REVENUE TOTAL $46,634,000 $38,458,500 $52,643,500 $75,270,000 $36,338,000 $249,344,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE NOTES NOTE: Collier County has adopted a two-year Concurrency Management System. Figures provided for years three, four and five of this Schedule of Capital Improvements are not part of the Concurrency Management System but must be financially feasible with a dedicated revenue source or an alternative revenue source if the dedicated revenue source is not realized. Figures provided for years six through ten of the Schedule of Capital Improvements are estimates of revenues versus project costs but do not constitute a long term concurrency system. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\05 CIE FY 26-30_20 AUIR CCPC FNL CIE Appendix - 4Page 15 of 189.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1793 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Capital Improvement Element - Appendix Table: 2020 Amendments APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL TBD County Landfill Cell Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL LTF - Landfill Tipping Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 REVENUE TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROJECTS SCHEDULE NOTES SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROJECT TOTALS NOTE: Collier County has adopted a two-year Concurrency Management System. Figures provided for years three, four and five of this Schedule of Capital Improvements are not part of the Concurrency Management System but must be financially feasible with a dedicated revenue source or an alternative revenue source if the dedicated revenue source is not realized. Figures provided for years six through ten of the Schedule of Capital Improvements are estimates of revenues versus project costs but do not constitute a long term concurrency system. * Pursuant to the Landfill Operating Agreement (LOA) with Waste Management, Inc. of Florida (WMIF), landfill cell construction is scheduled and guaranteed by WMIF over the life of the Collier County Landfill. Collier County landfill expansion costs are paid for by WMIF through agreed upon Collier County landfill tipping fees. By contract under the LOA, WMIF will construct any future required cells. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\05 CIE FY 26-30_20 AUIR CCPC FNL CIE Appendix - 5Page 16 of 189.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1794 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) Capital Improvement Element - Appendix Table: 2020 Amendments APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT $ AMOUNT PROJECT No.PROJECT FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL Expansion Related Projects $1,333,000 $103,000,000 $14,667,000 $0 $0 $119,000,000 Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $32,007,000 $29,830,000 $37,163,000 $31,330,000 $31,330,000 $161,660,000 Departmental Capital $817,000 $833,000 $850,000 $867,000 $884,000 $4,251,000 Debt Service $7,990,000 $7,171,500 $6,947,500 $8,034,000 $7,310,000 $37,453,000 Reserve for Contingencies - Replacement & Rehabilitation Projects $3,201,000 $2,983,000 $3,716,000 $3,133,000 $3,133,000 $16,166,000 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECT TOTALS $45,348,000 $143,817,500 $63,343,500 $43,364,000 $42,657,000 $338,530,000 REVENUE KEY - REVENUE SOURCE FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 TOTAL $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $6,600,000 $33,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $103,000,000 $14,667,000 $0 $0 $117,667,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $817,000 $833,000 $850,000 $867,000 $884,000 $4,251,000 $37,931,000 $33,384,500 $41,226,500 $35,897,000 $35,173,000 $183,612,000 REVENUE TOTAL $45,348,000 $143,817,500 $63,343,500 $43,364,000 $42,657,000 $338,530,000 SCA - Wastewater Capital Account - Transfers REV - Rate Revenue SIF - Wastewater System Development Fees / Impact Fees RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE NOTES B - Bond Proceeds SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans LOC - Commercial Paper, Additional Senior Lien NOTE: Figures provided for years six through ten of the Schedule of Capital Improvements are estimates of revenues versus project costs but do not constitute a long-term concurrency system. Revenue sources are estimates only; both the mix of sources and amounts will change when a rate study is conducted. I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\05 CIE FY 26-30_20 AUIR CCPC FNL CIE Appendix - 6Page 17 of 189.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1795 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) APPENDIX H FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY COST AND REVENUE SUMMARY TABLE FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 Projects Revenue Sources Expenditure Total ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROAD PROJECTS Revenues:IF - Impact Fees / COA Revenue $77,500,000 GA - Gas Tax Revenue $120,000,000 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 AC - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $0 TR - Transfers $0 GF - General Fund (001) $62,800,000 $0 IN - Interest - Fund 313 (Gas Tax & Interest Impact Fees $5,000,000 TX - Gas Tax $60,000,000 $325,300,000 Less Expenditures:$325,300,000 $325,300,000 Balance $0 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECTS Revenues:WIF - Water System Development Fees $32,000,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 B - Bond Proceeds $52,067,000 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 WCA - Water Capital Account $4,251,000 REV - Rate Revenue $161,026,000 $249,344,000 Less Expenditures:$249,344,000 $249,344,000 Balance $0 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS Revenues:SIF - Wastewater System Development Fees $33,000,000 RR - Revenue Reduction (less 5% required by law)$0 B - Bond Proceeds $117,667,000 SRF - State Revolving Fund Loans $0 LOC - Commercial Paper, Additional Senior Lien $0 SCA - Wastewater Capital Account $4,251,000 REV - Rate Revenue $183,612,000 $338,530,000 Less Expenditures:$338,530,000 $338,530,000 Balance $0 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROJECTS Revenues:LTF - Landfill Tipping Fees $0 $0 Less Expenditures:$0 $0 Balance $0 Revenues:IF - Impact Fees $0 GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 GF - General Fund (001) $0 $0 Less Expenditures:$0 $0 Balance $0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS Revenues: GR - Grants / Reimbursements $0 AC - Available Cash for Future Projects/Payment of Debt Service $0 CRA - Community Redevelopment Area/Municipal Service Taxing $0 GF - General Fund (001) $127,000,000 $127,000,000 Less Expenditures:$127,000,000 $127,000,000 Balance $0 TOTAL PROJECTS $1,040,174,000 TOTAL REVENUE SOURCES $1,040,174,000 The table below itemizes the types of public facilities and the sources of revenue. The "Revenue Amount" column contains the 5-Year amount of facility revenues. The right column is a calculation of expenses versus revenues for each type of public facility. All deficits are accumulated as a subtotal. The subtotal deficit is the source of additional revenue utilized by Collier County to fund the deficit in order to maintain the levels of service standards as referenced in the Capital Improvement Element. DC - Developer Contribution Agreements / Advanced Revenue Amount PARKS & RECREATION FACILITIES PROJECTS I:\GMD\AUIR\2020 AUIR 00 Schedules of Capital Improvements\05 CIE FY 26-30_20 AUIR CCPC FNL CIE Appendix - 7 Page 18 of 18 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 1796 Attachment: 2020 CIE Resolution - 092720 (13705 : PL20200001297 2020 AUIR & CIE Update) 10/15/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.4 Item Summary: ***Note: This item is continued to the November 5, 2020 CCPC meeting.*** PL20180002233 GMPA A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element and Map Series to create the NC Square Mixed-Use Overlay on land in the Agricultural/Rural designation and Rural Fringe Mixed Use District-Receiving Lands Overlay to allow up to 44,400 square feet of commercial uses, a 12,000 square foot daycare limited to 250 students, and a maximum of 129 residential dwelling units and furthermore providing for transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property is 24.4 acres and located at the northwest corner of Immokalee Road and Catawba Street approximately 1.6 miles west of Wilson Boulevard in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 10/15/2020 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning Name: Corby Schmidt 09/30/2020 5:22 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 09/30/2020 5:22 PM Approved By: Review: Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 10/01/2020 5:27 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 10/05/2020 6:26 AM Zoning Anita Jenkins Additional Reviewer Completed 10/05/2020 5:13 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 10/06/2020 9:07 AM Growth Management Department Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 10/06/2020 4:29 PM Zoning Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 10/06/2020 4:30 PM Planning Commission Edwin Fryer Meeting Pending 10/15/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 1797 10/15/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.5 Item Summary: ***Note: This item is continued to the November 5, 2020 CCPC meeting.*** PL20190002305 - MPUD (PUDR) Sabal Bay- Fleischmann Parcel An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 05-59, as amended, the Sabal Bay Mixed Use Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 102.49± acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A), Rural Agricultural with a Special Treatment overlay (A-ST), Residential Single Family-Three (RSF-3) and Residential Single Family-Three with a Special Treatment overlay (RSF-3-ST) to the Sabal Bay Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD); by amending the PUD document and master plan to add 102.49± acres designated as Tract R9 for residential development; to add 230 dwelling units for a total of 2,229 dwelling units in the MPUD; to revise the master plan and conceptual water management plan; and to add a master site plan for the R9 Tract. The subject property is located south of Thomasson Drive, south and west of U. S. 41, north and west of the Wentworth PUD, and east of the Naples Bay Intercoastal Waterway in Sections 23, 24, 25, 26 and 36, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, and Section 19, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 2,518.98+/- acres; and providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Ray Bellow, Planning Manager] Meeting Date: 10/15/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Laura DeJohn 09/28/2020 1:23 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 09/28/2020 1:23 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 09/28/2020 2:28 PM Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 09/29/2020 11:59 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 09/29/2020 12:25 PM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 10/05/2020 6:18 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 10/06/2020 10:55 AM Planning Commission Edwin Fryer Meeting Pending 10/15/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 1798