DSAC Agenda 10/07/2020C o Ter C: 1Ou lty
Growth Management Department
Development Services Advisory
Committee
Meeting
Wednesday, October 7, 2020
3:00 pm
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr.
Naples, FL 34104
Growth Management Department
Conference Rooms 609/610
If you have any questions or wish to meet with
staff, please contact
Trish Mill at 252-8214
For more information please contact Trish Mill at (239) 252-8214 or Patricia.Mill@colliercountyfl.gov
Development Services Advisory Committee
Wednesday, October 7, 2020
3:00 pm
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104
Growth Management Building, Conference Rooms 609/610
NOTICE:
AS PART OF AN ONGOING INITIATIVE TO PROMOTE SOCIAL DISTANCING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE
PUBLIC WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENTS REMOTELY, AS WELL AS IN PERSON,
DURING THIS PROCEEDING. INDIVIDUALS WHO WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY, SHOULD REGISTER ANY
TIME AFTER THE AGENDA IS POSTED ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE WHICH IS 6 DAYS BEFORE THE MEETING THROUGH
THE LINK PROVIDED, LISTING THE TOPIC THEY WISH TO ADDRESS. INDIVIDUALS WHO REGISTER WILL RECEIVE AN
EMAIL IN ADVANCE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING DETAILING HOW THEY CAN PARTICIPATE REMOTELY IN THIS MEETING.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING, PLEASE CALL TRISH MILL AT (239) 252-8214 OR REGISTER
AT:
http://bit.ly/Oct7DSACSpeakerRegistration
THIS LINK CAN ALSO BE USED FOR THOSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO VIEW THE MEETING BUT NOT SPEAK. CHOOSE
THE FIRST OPTION “I DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK- VIEWING ONLY” AS YOUR AGENDA ITEM.
Persons wishing to speak on any Agenda item will receive up to three (3) minutes unless the Chairman adjusts the
time. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and speak into a microphone. State your name and affiliation
before commenting. During the discussion, Committee Members may direct questions to the speaker.
Please silence cell phones and digital devices. There may not be a break in this meeting. Please mute your audio if
you have not been recognized by the Chairman to speak or to conduct any personal business. All parties
participating in the public meeting are to observe Roberts Rules of Order and wait to be recognized by the Chairman.
Please speak one at a time and into the microphone so the Hearing Reporter can record all statements being made.
For more information please contact Trish Mill at (239) 252-8214 or Patricia.Mill@colliercountyfl.gov
Agenda:
1. Call to order - Chairman
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of Minutes:
a. DSAC Meeting – September 2, 2020
b. DSAC LDR Subcommittee Meeting – September 15, 2020
4. Public Speakers
5. Staff Announcements/Updates
a. Code Enforcement Division update – [Mike Ossorio]
b. Public Utilities Department update – [Eric Fey or designee]
c. Growth Management Department Transportation Engineering Division & Planning Division
updates – [Jay Ahmad or designee]
d. Collier County Fire Review update – [Shar Beddow or Shawn Hanson]
e. North Collier Fire Review update – [Capt. Sean Lintz or Daniel Zunzunegui]
f. Operations & Regulatory Mgmt. Division update – [Ken Kovensky]
g. Development Review Division update – [Matt McLean]
6. New Business
a. LDC Amendments
i. PL20200001627 - Public Utility Ancillary Systems
ii. PL20200001703 - Community Housing Plan (CHP) Implementation-Regulatory Relief
iii. PL20200001721 - Communication Towers in Estates District
iv. PL20200001602 - 2020 Scrivener’s Errors
7. Old Business
8. Committee Member Comments
9. Adjourn
FUTURE MEETING DATES:
November 4, 2020 – 3:00 pm
December 2, 2020 – 3:00 pm
January 6, 2021 – 3:00 pm
September 2, 2020
1
MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
Naples, Florida, September 2, 2020
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Development Services Advisory
Committee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on
this date at 3:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier County Growth Management
Department Building, Conference Room #609/610, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples,
Florida, with the following members present:
Chairman: William J. Varian
Vice Chairman: Blair Foley (Excused)
David Dunnavant
James E. Boughton
Clay Brooker
Chris Mitchell
Robert Mulhere
Mario Valle
Norman Gentry
Marco Espinar
Laura Spurgeon DeJohn
Jeremy Sterk
Jeff Curl
John English
Mark McLean
ALSO PRESENT:
Jamie French, Deputy Department Head
Patricia Mill, Operations Analyst, Staff Liaison
Eric Fey, Sr. Project Manager, Public Utilities
Colleen Davidson, Code Enforcement Division
Jay Ahmad, Director, Transportation Engineering
Matt McLean, Director, Development Review
Rich Long, Director, Plans Review and Inspections
Ken Kovensky, Director, Operations and Regulatory Management
Danny Condamina, Sr. Operations Analyst
Diane Lynch, Operations Analyst
September 2, 2020
2
Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the audio recording
from the Collier County Growth Management Department.
I. Call to Order - Chairman
Chairman Varian called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
II. Approval of Agenda
Mr. Curl moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Mulhere. Carried unanimously 14 - 0.
III. Approval of Minutes from August 5, 2020 Meeting
a. DSAC Meeting – August 5, 2020
Mr. Curl moved to approve the minutes of the August 5, 2020; meeting as presented. Second by
Mr. McLean. Carried unanimously 14 - 0.
The Subcommittee meeting minutes were approved by the Members of the Subcommittee.
b. DSAC-LDR Subcommittee Meeting – January 7, 2020
Mr. Mulhere moved to approve the minutes of the January 7, 2020; Subcommittee meeting as
presented. Second by Mr. Curl. Carried unanimously 4 - 0.
c. DSAC-LDR Subcommittee Meeting – February 19, 2020
Mr. Curl moved to approve the minutes of the February 19, 2020; Subcommittee meeting as
presented. Second by Mr. McLean. Carried unanimously 4 - 0.
d. DSAC-LDR Subcommittee Meeting – June 18, 2020
Mr. McLean moved to approve the minutes of the June 18, 2020; Subcommittee meeting as
presented. Second by Mr. Curl. Carried unanimously 4 - 0.
e. DSAC-LDR Subcommittee Meeting – July 28, 2020
Mr. McLean moved to approve the minutes of the July 28, 2020; Subcommittee meeting as
presented. Second by Mr. Curl. Carried unanimously 4 - 0.
IV. Public Speakers
None
V. Staff Announcements/Updates
A. Code Enforcement Division update – [Mike Ossorio]
Ms. Davidson provided the report “Code Enforcement Division Monthly Report July 22, – August
21, 2020 Highlights” for informational purposes. She noted that there were over 1,700 lien searches
in August and the Special Magistrate has resumed hearings which were delayed as a result of the
pandemic. The Division has documented 98 violations of the mandatory mask order initiated by the
County to address the pandemic.
B. Public Utilities Division update – [Tom Chmelik or designee]
Mr. Fey noted that the usual reports submitted to the Committee have not been provided this month
due to recent absences of staff. The shortage has also resulted in delays in addressing client requests
however he anticipates the level of service and reports will be back up to speed by next month.
September 2, 2020
3
He will be bringing an item forward to the Land Development Review Subcommittee regarding the
proposed relinquishing of the requirement to maintain a 5-foot setback from existing utility
equipment when a rehab project is proposed.
C. Growth Management Department/Transportation Engineering and/or Planning – [Jay Ahmad
or designee]
Mr. Ahmad reported:
Golden Gate Blvd. – 20th St. to Everglades Blvd. – Project completed including widening to
4 lanes and installations of sidewalks.
Palm River Bridge Replacement – Project initiated on 8/18 and major work anticipated to be
completed in 7 months. Detour in place to address traffic flow in the area.
Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext. – Design phase 50 percent complete, right of way acquisition
underway which is anticipated to be completed in one year.
Veterans Memorial Parkway - Extension required to serve new high school; Phase I of the
project to the high school; Notice to Proceed anticipated for November with the high school
scheduled to open in 2023.
Whippoorwill Lane Ext. – Project continues with 4 roundabouts to be constructed with the
project which was the result of public input.
Mr. Brooker reported that there are issues with the detour including impeded traffic flows due to
the narrow-traveled way, damage to lawns, etc. – Mr. Ahmad noted the County is aware of the issue
however there are no plans to alter the detour given it is only a 7-month project.
D. County Fire Review update – [Shar Beddow and/or Shawn Hanson]
Ms. Beddow reported that turnaround times are as follows: Building Plan review – 418 at 2 days;
Site Plan reviews 52 at 1 day; Inspections – 1 day. The NFPA conferences have been cancelled and
may be held on-line due to concerns with the pandemic.
E. North Naples Fire Review update – [Capt. Sean Lintz or Daniel Zunzunegui]
Mr. Zunzunegui reported that turnaround times are as follows: Building Plan review – 554 in
August with Site Plan reviews remaining at the historical rate; Inspections – 1 day. Impact fee
changes are under consideration and the Department is partnering with CCSO for a student safety
education program including those remaining at home to attend school.
F. Operations & Regulatory Mgmt. Division update [Ken Kovensky]
Mr. Kovensky submitted the “Collier County August 2020 Monthly Statistics” which outlined the
building plan and land development review activities. The following was noted during his report:
That the Permitting activity is brisk, with June, July and August increasing by 10 percent.
The Division is short staffed, and management is seeking to utilize, and outside temporary
source given the number of job bankers has decreased over the past months from 64 to 39.
Overtime for existing employees has been utilized however it is still difficult to meet client
demands.
Mark McLean requested clarification on the inspection process for an owner builder re-roof project
as it has come to his attention in a recent case the inspector visited the site and one affidavit was not
on file by the owner. The inspector left the property and returned on another day to conduct the
physical inspection and found an improper flashing installment. This created a situation whereby the
September 2, 2020
4
inspector had to return for a third time in the process to complete the inspection. He recommended
the process be reviewed to allow the inspector to complete his field duties and request any
documentation be filed to provide for a more efficient use of time – Staff noted they will review the
issue and determine if any changes in the process are necessary.
G. Development Review Division update [Matt McLean]
Mr. McLean reported:
That the Hearing Examiner is reviewing cases again.
Investigation is underway to provide for Neighborhood Information Meetings at County
venues such as North Collier Regional Parks.
PUD Monitoring has been transferred to the Development Review Division.
There is a new product approved for Public Utilities involving meter boxes.
VI. New Business
A. Paperless Permit Process
Mr. Condamina presented the PowerPoint “Paperless Permit Project – Process Improvement” for
informational purposes noting:
That currently, 80 percent of the building and 60 percent of the planning applications are
submitted electronically, and the County is moving towards 100 percent electronic plan
submittal and review.
The goal is to streamline the business process by dedicating resources to one process,
improve record keeping and provide a continuity of business.
There will still be customer consultations, records retrieval, inspections scheduling and other
non electronic services offered by the Division.
The activity will provide for online training by appointment, front counter support and
updated education videos and other online services.
The endeavor is anticipated be live by December with a public awareness and training slated
for November.
During Committee Member discussion, the following was noted:
That the process is anticipated to take 5 years and retrieval of records will be conducted in
the current format or downloadable online for those interested in electronically viewing
and/or storing the documents.
Walk in paper applications will still be processed, however the applicant’s information will
be converted to an electronic format for the plan reviewer.
The goal is to provide convenience for the customers and allow the County the ability to re-
purpose staff and improve service.
VII. Old Business
None
VIII. Committee Member Comments
None
IX. Adjourn
Next Meeting Dates
October 7, 2020 GMD Conference Room 610 – 3:00 p.m.
September 2, 2020
5
November 4, 2020 GMD Conference Room 610 – 3:00 p.m.
December 2, 2020 GMD Conference Room 610 – 3:00 p.m.
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order
of the Chair at 4:05 P.M.
COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
_____________________________________________
Chairman, William Varian
These Minutes were approved by the Board/Chairman on ______________________________________,
as presented _______, or as amended ________.
September 15, 2020
Page 1 of 6
MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, September 15, 2020
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Development Services Advisory Committee
Land Development Review Subcommittee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted
business herein, met on this date at 2:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Growth
Management Department Building, Room 609/610 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL
with the following persons present:
Chairman: Clay Brooker Blair Foley (via Zoom)
Robert Mulhere
Jeff Curl (via Zoom)
Mark McLean (via Zoom)
ALSO PRESENT: Jeremy Frantz, LDC Manager
Richard Henderlong, Principal Planner
Eric Johnson, Principal Planner
Eric Fey, Public Utilities
Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the audio recording from
the Collier County Growth Management Division – Planning and Regulation building.
The meeting was held via Zoom and attendance in the conference room.
1. Call to order
Chairman Brooker called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. and a quorum was established.
2. Approve agenda
Mr. Foley moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Curl. Carried unanimously 5 – 0.
3. Old Business
None
4. New Business
a. PL20200001703 - CHP Implementation – Regulatory Relief
LDC Section to be Amended: 4.02.39 Design Deviation for Housing that is Affordable (New
September 15, 2020
Page 2 of 6
Section)
Mr. Frantz presented the proposed amendment noting it provides relief from certain design standards
for affordable housing pursuant to the Community Housing Plan recommendations.
The Subcommittee reviewed the proposed amendments noting the following:
Section 4.02.39. B.1 – Local/internal roads that are privately maintained may be designed to the 5-
year, 1-day storm event, and shall be designed so that surrounding properties will not be adversely
impacted by the project’s influence on stormwater sheet flow up to the 25 year, 3-day design storm.
Clarification would be beneficial given the intent is for the roadway elevation being constructed to a 5-
year, 1-day storm event and the entire project subject to design standards for a 25-year, 3-day storm
event.
Section 4.02.39. B.2 - Single-family developments are exempt from providing one canopy tree per 3,000
square feet of pervious open space per lot.
Concern was expressed on eliminating the requirement for planting of the tree and it was recommended
consideration be given to allowing the tree to be relocated elsewhere within the development.
Section 4.02.39. B.5 - Payment-in-lieu of construction of external sidewalks, bike lanes and pathways
may be deferred to be paid by grant funding or assessment at the time that the County constructs
sidewalks, bike lanes or pathways within the public or private right-of-way or easement adjacent to the
site.
Concern the requirement may burden a future, single-family landowner years after the project has been
completed. It may be acceptable for owners of apartment complexes however consideration should be
given to requiring the developer pay at the time of construction for the single-family housing.
Section 4.02.39. B.4 - For local/internal sidewalks that are privately maintained, the minimum sidewalk
width shall be four feet, which can be of concrete or asphalt material and shall be constructed over a
compacted subgrade. Asphalt shall also require a minimum of 4 inches of compacted limerock base, in
addition to the compacted subgrade.
Discussion occurred noting if only one sidewalk is constructed, the width required should be 5 feet
however Staff noted the intent is for sidewalks to be built on both sides of the roadways.
Mr. Curl moved for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the Board of
County Commissioners adopt the proposed amendment subject to the following changes:
1. Section 4.02.39. B.1 – language to read “Local/internal roads that are privately maintained may
be designed to the elevation of a 5-year, 1-day storm event, and the overall project shall be designed
up to an elevation so that surrounding properties will not be adversely impacted by the project’s
influence on stormwater sheet flow up to the 25 year, 3-day design storm” (or similar language).
2. Section 4.02.39. B.2 – Staff to address the exemption of the planting of canopy trees and allow
them to be relocated to different areas on site.
3. Section 4.02.39. B.5 – Staff review the language for payment in lieu of the sidewalks to determine
any changes necessary to relieve the potential burden from future landowners.
Second by Mr. McLean.
Discussion occurred on Section 4.02.39. B.1 noting it may be beneficial to ensure the language is clear
on the design for storm events. The “entire project” wording infers the entire project has to meet a
certain elevation whereas the requirement is design standards are based on control elevations for the
perimeter of the site.
Mr. Curl amended the motion for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the
Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed amendment subject to the following changes:
September 15, 2020
Page 3 of 6
1. Section 4.02.39. B.1 – language to read “Local/internal roads that are privately maintained may
be designed to the 5-year, 1-day storm event, and the overall project shall be designed up to an
elevation so the perimeter berm of the site will control a 25 year, 3-day design storm event so that
surrounding properties will not be adversely impacted by the project’s influence on stormwater sheet
flow during such event” (or similar language).
2. Section 4.02.39. B.2 – Staff to address the exemption of the planting of canopy trees and allow
them to be relocated to different areas on site.
3. Section 4.02.39. B.5 – Staff review the language for payment in lieu of the sidewalks to determine
any changes necessary to relieve the potential burden from future landowners.
Second by Mr. McLean. Carried unanimously 5 – 0.
b. PL20200001627 – Public Utility Ancillary Systems
LDC Section to be Amended: 5.05.12 Specific Standards for Public Utility Ancillary Systems in
Collier County
Mr. Henderlong presented the proposed amendment noting it removes the minimum height and
increases the maximum height to ten feet for a fence or wall, maintains the existing setback of five feet
from adjacent property and right-of-way lines for a fence or wall enclosing new PUAS facilities, and
exempts a fence or wall enclosing existing PUAS facilities from the five-foot minimum setback.
Section 5.05.12 C.3 – Fences and walls enclosing public utility ancillary systems shall not exceed ten
feet in height unless an administrative fence waiver is approved in accordance with the LDC Section
5.03.02.
Discussion occurred on the rationale for not requiring a minimum height for the fencing with Staff
noting it was an option for security purposes and if a lower fence was proposed, a deviation would not
be required.
Mr. Foley moved for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the Board of
County Commissioners adopt the proposed amendment as presented by Staff. Second by Mr. Curl.
Carried unanimously 5 – 0.
c. PL20200001706 – Definition of Lifestyle Signs
LDC Section to be Amended: 5.06.00 Sign Regulations and Standards by Land Use Classification
Mr. Frantz presented the proposed amendment noting it establishes a new definition for a lifestyle sign
in the Collier County’s Sign Code. It clarifies the difference between a lifestyle sign and a real estate
sign.
Discussion occurred with the Subcommittee noting:
• The proposal establishes a differentiation between the definition of a real estate and “life style”
sign.
• To adequately address the use of life style signs, it would be beneficial to implement
regulations on the number allowed on a site, the spacing of the signs, the location (visible from
public right of ways vs. internal to the development), size, height and setback requirements,
etc. to ensure they do not become a public nuisance.
• Staff should review a recent example for the signs proposed for the “Hyde Park” project during
their permit review.
• Consideration should also be given to requiring a certain size development being allowed to
place the signage to eliminate the potential for a builder with a small number of lots installing
the signs.
• In certain instances, with proper setbacks and standards, it may be amenable to allow the
signage to be visible from a public right of way.
September 15, 2020
Page 4 of 6
Mr. Mulhere moved for Staff to review the comments and return the proposed amendment to the
Subcommittee for consideration after addressing the following items: the requirements for the
number, setback, height and spacing of the signs to be installed on the subject properties. Second by
Mr. Foley.
Discussion occurred noting it would be advantageous to include cross referencing the County sign code
where necessary and address the duration the signs are allowed to be in place given many developments
take several years to build out.
Mr. Mulhere moved for Staff review the comments and return the proposed amendment to the
Subcommittee for consideration after addressing the following items: the requirements for the
number, setback, height, spacing and duration allowed for the signs to be installed on the subject
properties including cross referencing the requirements of the sign code or other LDC sections as
necessary. Second by Mr. Foley. Carried unanimously 5 – 0.
d. PL20200001721 – Communication Towers in Estates Districts
LDC Section to be Amended: 2.03.01 Agricultural Districts
5.05.09 Communication Towers
Mr. Henderlong presented the proposed amendment noting it implements the Golden Gate Area
Master Plan (GGAMP) to allow cellular towers as a conditional use in the Estates (E) Zoning District
on parcels that are a minimum of 2.25 acres and located adjacent to collector or arterial roads. It also
corrects a few cross references. The towers are allowed the Estate (E) zoning district only on parcels
designated as Urban or Rural sites or approved for a specified essential service listed in subsection
5.05.09 of the Code.
Section 5.05.09 G.25.d and e. – “Fencing height and landscaping. Perimeter wall or fence height shall
be 8 feet from finished grade of base supporting structure and no greater than 10 feet. A minimum 15
feet landscape buffer along the perimeter of wall or fence is required.
e. - Equipment cabinets. Overall height of ground-mounted equipment or equipment enclosure shall not
exceed 12 feet
Discussion occurred noting it would be beneficial to eliminate the 8-foot minimum height and require a
fence or wall a maximum of 10 feet in height. Additionally, it would be advantageous to require a
“Type B” landscape buffer with tree heights a minimum of 12 feet given equipment may be up to 12
feet in height.
Ensure the language is clear a fence or wall is required and not an option.
General Comment - Staff should review the terminology “adjacent” and “abutting” to ensure the
language addresses the concerns in the various sections given the term “adjacent” does include lands
across a public right of way.
Section 5.05.09 G.25.c.i and ii – “New towers up to 75 feet in height shall be located not less than the
total height of the tower and antennas from all residentially zoned properties. New towers over 75 feet
in height shall be located not less than two and one-half times the height of the tower and antennas, or
the certified collapse area, whichever distance is greater, from all residentially zoned properties.”
Discussion on the rational for the 75-foot setback from adjacent residential zoned lands with Staff
noting it was derived from other sections of the Land Development Code.
Approval Process
Discussion occurred on the approval process with Staff noting if the application meets the requirements
of the proposed amendment it would be eligible for approval. Others on the Subcommittee commented
it may be a two-step process whereby the conditional use approval would be required through a zoning
September 15, 2020
Page 5 of 6
application followed by approval of a Site Development Plan. Staff noted they would confirm the
process.
Mr. Foley moved to for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the Board of
County Commissioners adopt the proposed amendment subject to the following changes:
1. Section 5.05.09 G.25.d - Remove minimum wall height requirement and provide for 10 foot
maximum and require a Type B buffer with trees a minimum of 12 feet in height; ensure it is
clear a fence or wall is required.
2. Review the language to ensure use of term adjacent versus abutting meets the intended goals of
the sections where cited.
Second by Mr. Curl. Carried unanimously 5 – 0.
e. PL20200001602 – 2020 Scrivener’s Errors
LDC Section to be Amended: 1.08.02 Definitions
2.03.01 Agricultural Districts
2.03.02 Residential Zoning Districts
2.03.03 Commercial Zoning Districts
2.03.05 Civic and Institutional Zoning Districts
2.03.07 Overlay Zoning Districts
2.03.08 Rural Fringe Zoning Districts
4.02.06 Standards for Development within the Airport Overlay
(APO)
10.02.03 Requirements for Site Development, Site Improvement
Plans and Amendments thereof
10.02.05 Construction, Approval, and Acceptance of Required
Improvements
10.02.13 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Procedures
Appendix A-Standard Performance Security Documents for
Required Improvements
Mr. Henderlong presented the proposed amendment noting it corrects scrivener’s errors and updates
cross references related to various Land Development Code (LDC) sections.
Mr. McLean moved to for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the Board of
County Commissioners adopt the proposed amendment as presented by Staff. Second by Mr. Curl.
Carried unanimously 5 – 0.
5. Public comments
None
Subcommittee Member Comments
Mr. Brooker queried if the DSAC should review certain GMP amendments and recommended the item be
placed on the next Committee meeting for discussion.
September 15, 2020
Page 6 of 6
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order of the Chair
at 3:29 P.M.
COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE - LAND DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE
_______________________________________________
Clay Brooker – Sub-Committee Chairman
These Minutes were approved by the Committee on _________, as presented ______, or as amended ________.
Public Utilities DepartmentEngineering and Project Management Division2 1 1 1 1 13743242210101221006770452956887150246810121416020406080100120140Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20RequestsBusiness DaysResponse Time - Letters of AvailabilityRequests CompletedMinimumAverageMaximumRequests Received
Public Utilities DepartmentEngineering and Project Management Division201020 02222111616202618250510152025300510152025Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20RequestsBusiness DaysResponse Time - Utility DeviationsRequests CompletedSufficiency Review TimeSubstantive Review TimeRequests Received
Public Utilities DepartmentEngineering and Project Management Division45290371932129461113801111553602468101205101520253035404550Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20RequestsBusiness DaysResponse Time - FDEP PermitsRequests CompletedInitial Review TimeRevision Review TimeDirector Approval TimeRequests Received
Count of Reference Number Column Labels
Row Labels Greater Naples Fire Immokalee Fire North Collier BC Fire North Collier NN Fire Ochopee Fire (blank)Grand Total
113-000000-209101 238 238
113-000000-209102 1 1
113-000000-209103 3 11 422 19 455
113-000000-209105 26 2 8 36
113-000000-209115 186 6 192
113-000000-209601 6 6
113-000000-209701 6 6
113-000000-209811 64 11 75
113-000000-209815 218 218
113-000000-209850 44 44
113-138900-322125 352 4 10 32 398
Grand Total 759 76 81 677 16 60 1,669
Row Labels Sum of Amount Paid
113-000000-209101 69,165.18$
113-000000-209102 (100.00)$
113-000000-209103 84,876.35$
113-000000-209105 6,792.45$
113-000000-209115 51,537.97$
113-000000-209601 1,137.55$
113-000000-209701 1,178.80$
113-000000-209811 47,389.07$
113-000000-209815 179,534.36$
113-000000-209850 129,099.66$
113-138900-322125 48,200.96$
Grand Total 618,812.35$
1
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\LDC 5.05.12 Public Utility Ancillary Systems in Collier
County 10-07-20 DSAC.docx
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
PETITION
PL20200001627
SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT
This amendment modifies the setback requirements for fences and walls
enclosing Public Utility Ancillary System (PUAS) facilities.
LDC SECTION TO BE AMENDED
5.05.12 Specific Standards for Public Utility Ancillary Systems in
Collier County
ORIGIN
Public Utilities
Department
HEARING DATES
BCC TBD
CCPC TBD
DSAC 10-07-20
DSAC-LDR 09-15-20
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS
DSAC-LDR
Approval
DSAC
TBD
CCPC
TBD
BACKGROUND
The Land Development Code (LDC) defines Public Utility Ancillary Systems as “The individual or collective
appurtenant equipment and structures owned or operated by a public or quasi-public entity which are integral to
treatment facilities that provide raw water, potable water, irrigation quality (IQ) water and wastewater services.”
Older PUAS locations are often constrained in size and cannot accommodate new equipment and site requirements
within a fence or wall enclosure that maintains minimum setback requirements. Additionally, the current maximum
fence and wall height is frequently insufficient to screen equipment.
This amendment removes the minimum height and increases the maximum height to ten feet for a fence or wall,
maintains the existing setback of five feet from adjacent property and right-of-way lines for a fence or wall enclosing
new PUAS facilities, and exempts a fence or wall enclosing existing PUAS facilities from the five -foot minimum
setback. Exhibit A shows examples of existing pump stations where a five-foot minimum setback would preclude
construction of a wall or fence within the existing easement.
The amendment also relocates the fence and wall height standard out of the setback requirement subsection LDC
5.05.12 B.3 to a new LDC section 5.05.12 C and enumerates the remaining sections.
Lastly, a cross reference to LDC section 10.02.03 has been added to clarify when a site development plan or site
improvement plan requires an insubstantial change.
2
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\LDC 5.05.12 Public Utility Ancillary Systems in Collier
County 10-07-20 DSAC.docx
FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS
There are no anticipated fiscal or operational
impacts associated with this amendment.
GMP CONSISTENCY
To be provided by Comprehensive Planning Staff.
EXHIBITS: A) Pump Stations 316.01 and 317.01
DRAFT
3
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\LDC 5.05.12 Public Utility Ancillary Systems in
Collier County 10-07-20 DSAC.docx
Amend the LDC as follows:
1
5.05.12 – Specific Standards for Public Utility Ancillary Systems in Collier County. 2
3
A. Applicability. When water and wastewater is conveyed through physically connected 4
infrastructure to or from a public or quasi-public treatment facility, the system of physically 5
interconnected infrastructure, including but not limited to raw water wells, pump stations, 6
water and wastewater storage tanks, vaults, valves, antennas, and other appurtenant 7
equipment, shall be considered to be collectively located onsite as that term is to be 8
applied in the GMP CCME Policies 6.1.1 and 6.1.2, and any implementing land 9
development regulations. Applicable designs for public utility ancillary systems selected 10
from the Collier County Utility Standards Manual shall be submitted for appropriate County 11
staff review of the following requirements. 12
13
B. Setback Requirements 14
15
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 16
17
3. Fences and walls enclosing public utility ancillary systems must meet the following 18
setbacks: installed after [effective date of this ordinance] shall be setback five feet 19
from adjacent property and right-of-way lines. For those public utility ancillary 20
systems installed prior to [effective date of this ordinance] or installed in utility 21
easements created prior to [effective date of this ordinance], there will be no 22
minimum setback for fences and walls. 23
24
Adjacent to Right-of-Way or easement line - 5 feet. 25
26
Side yard or easement line - 5 feet. 27
28
Appurtenant equipment, other than antennas, that exceeds the height of the fence 29
or wall, shall be setback no less than the underlying zoning district's requirements 30
for side yard setback. 31
32
Rear yard or easement line - 5 feet. 33
34
Raw water well easements contained within a larger public easement - 2 feet. 35
36
Fence or wall heights may be between six (6) feet and eight (8) feet in height. 37
38
Appurtenant equipment shall not be considered as separate structures. 39
40
C. Fences and walls enclosing public utility ancillary systems shall not exceed ten feet in 41
height unless an administrative fence waiver is approved in accordance with the LDC 42
section 5.03.02. 43
44
CD. Public utility ancillary system site access: 45
46
1. Direct access from public ways shall be limited to one (1) access point and must 47
otherwise comply with the requirements of LDC Ssection 4.04.02 48
49
DRAFT
4
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\LDC 5.05.12 Public Utility Ancillary Systems in
Collier County 10-07-20 DSAC.docx
2 Access from an easement must provide legal access to a public or approved 1
private way. Access from an existing public way to an easement must otherwise 2
comply with the requirements of LDC Ssection 4.04.02. 3
4
DE. Prior to County approval of any public utility ancillary system site under this Code, the 5
applicant shall obtain permits from SFWMD, FDEP or other state or federal agency having 6
jurisdiction over the intended use if such permits are required. 7
8
EF. Stormwater management and environmental resource permits for public utility ancillary 9
system sites shall be governed by the requirements of SFWMD or FDEP, and if approval 10
is granted for the public utility ancillary system by SFWMD or FDEP under those 11
requirements, or said requirements are deemed not applicable by SFWMD or FDEP due 12
to the de minimus size or nature of the public utility ancillary system site as verified in 13
writing by SFWMD or FDEP, the project may be considered for a waiver from the 14
requirements of LDC Ssection 10.02.02 A. 15
16
FG. Landscaping and buffering shall conform to the requirements of LDC Ssection 4.06.05 B. 17
4 18
19
GH. Site planning review and approval for public utility ancillary systems must follow the 20
requirements of an insubstantial change to a Site Development Plan or Site Improvement 21
Plan review process as required in LDC section 10.02.03, providing water, wastewater or 22
irrigation quality water from such public utility ancillary system is conveyed through 23
physically connected infrastructure to a public or quasi-public treatment facility. The 24
system of physically inter-connected infrastructure and wells may be considered to be 25
collectively located "on-site". 26
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
Exhibit A- Pump Stations 101.16 and 305.17
5
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\LDC 5.05.12 Public Utility Ancillary Systems in
Collier County 10-07-20 DSAC.docx
1
Exhibit A- Pump Stations 101.16 and 305.17
6
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\LDC 5.05.12 Public Utility Ancillary Systems in
Collier County 10-07-20 DSAC.docx
1
1
L:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Community Housing Plan Implementation\Initiative 1 - Regulatory Relief\LDC 4.02.39 Design Deviations
for Housing that is Affordable 09-25-20 DSAC.docx
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
PETITION
PL20200001703
SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT
This amendment proposes relief from certain design standards for
Housing that is Affordable pursuant to the Community Housing Plan
recommendations.
LDC SECTION TO BE AMENDED
ORIGIN
Community and Human
Services Division
HEARING DATES
BCC
CCPC
DSAC
DSAC-LDR
TBD
TBD
10/07/2020
09/15/2020
2.03.02
4.02.04
4.02.39
Residential Zoning Districts
Standards for Cluster Residential Design
Design Deviations for Housing that is Affordable (New
Section)
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS
DSAC-LDR
Approval with changes
DSAC
TBD
CCPC
TBD
BACKGROUND
At the October 9, 2018 Board of County Commissioners meeting the Board provided direction upon the
final recommendations of the Collier County Housing Plan. As part of that review, the Board directed
staff to prepare Growth Management Plan (GMP) and Land Development Code (LDC) amendments on
five specific initiatives identified within the Housing Plan:
1. Regulatory relief for affordable housing applications
2. Streamline commercial to residential conversions
3. Incentivize mixed income residential housing in future and redeveloped Activity Centers
4. Create a Strategic Opportunity Sites designation process and allow for increased density
5. Increase density along transit corridors
The first Initiative, regulatory relief for affordable housing applications, seeks to evaluate cost saving
measures identified in the Collier Housing Plan to provide for relief from specified processes and
standards to increase certainty and cost savings for projects that include housing that is affordable. In
addition to the areas identified within the Housing Plan, the Housing team in coordination with a
development industry stakeholder’s group worked to identified and recommended other areas of
potential cost savings relief for housing that is affordable. The approach tries to ensure t hat the quality
of the project does not suffer from a functional or aesthetic standpoint, while allowing the overall cost
of each unit in the project to be reduced, and therefore increasing the potential for future projects to
increase the supply of housing that is affordable.
The changes introduced with this initiative relate to the cost savings in terms of materials required and
standards imposed on projects that provide for housing that is affordable , as well as the process for
approval for cluster housing that is affordable project. As noted, the Community Housing Plan identified
a number of areas to be included for cost savings such as: limiting the number of County reviews for
various disciplines, removing the requirement for a generator as a lift station, and only requiring
2
L:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Community Housing Plan Implementation\Initiative 1 - Regulatory Relief\LDC 4.02.39 Design Deviations
for Housing that is Affordable 09-25-20 DSAC.docx
sidewalks on one side of the street. These and additional areas of cost savings identified as part of a
stakeholder think tank held February 21st at the Habitat for Humanity’s Offices formed the basis for the
relief being proposed.
It should be noted that all the initiatives directed by the Board at the October 8 th, 2018 public hearing
could be classified under the premise of regulatory relief, but this initiative focuses upon specific design
components that can be identified as areas of relief, as well as certain process within the County review
that can be identified as potential cost savings, such as making cluster housing that is affordable a
permitted use in the RMF-6 zoning district and amending standards for compatibility compliance. The
full list of cost savings strategies was scrutinized by the Consultant, Housing Staff and Growth
Management Staff to find agreement on the specific relief measures to be incorporated within the
proposed LDC amendments contained within Initiative One.
DSAC-LDR Subcommittee Recommendation
The DSAC-LDR Subcommittee reviewed the amendment on September 15, 2020, and recommended
approval with the following changes:
• Clarify proposed Section 4.02.39 B.1 regarding storm event design requirements.
o These proposed changes have been incorporated in the amendment.
• Modify proposed Section 4.02.39 B.2 to require relocation of required trees to street trees or
buffer areas, rather than simply exempting the requirement.
o This section has been modified to exempt required trees only on lots adjacent to preserve
areas or perimeter berms and allowing all other required trees to be relocated to common
areas or street tree programs.
• Consider changes to proposed Section 4.02.39 B.5 which allowed for the deferral of payment-in-
lieu of construction of external sidewalks to address potential issues related to deferral of an
assessment to future homeowners.
o This provision has been removed from the amendment.
FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS
There are no anticipated fiscal or operational
impacts to the County. The amendment
relaxes development standards and
application requirements for housing that is
affordable. The amendment is intended to
decrease costs and application review time
for developers of housing that is affordable.
GMP CONSISTENCY
The proposed LDC amendment has been reviewed by
Comprehensive Planning staff and may be deemed
consistent with the GMP.
EXHIBITS: N/A
DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added
Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted
3
L:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Community Housing Plan Implementation\Initiative 1 - Regulatory Relief\LDC 4.02.39 Design
Deviations for Housing that is Affordable 09-25-20 DSAC.docx
Amend the LDC as follows:
1
2.03.02 - Residential Zoning Districts 2
3
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 4
5
B. Residential Multi-Family-6 District (RMF-6). The purpose and intent of the residential multi-6
family-6 district (RMF-6) is to provide for single-family, two-family and multi-family 7
residences having a low profile silhouette, surrounded by open space , being so situated 8
that it is located in close proximity to public and commercial services and has direct or 9
convenient access to collector and arterial roads on the county major road network. The 10
RMF-6 district corresponds to and implements the urban mixed use land use designation 11
on the future land use map of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible 12
in the RMF-6 district and the urban mixed use land use designation shall be guided, in 13
part, by the density rating system contained in the future land use element of the Collier 14
County GMP. The maximum density permissible or permitted in the RMF-6 district shall 15
not exceed the density permissible under the density rating system, except as permitted 16
by policies contained in the future land use element. 17
18
1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the 19
uses that are allowable as accessory or conditional uses in the RMF-6 district. 20
21
a. Permitted uses. 22
23
1. Single-family dwellings. 24
25
2. Duplexes, two-family dwellings. 26
27
3. Multi-family dwellings, townhouses as provided for in section 28
5.05.07. 29
30
4. Family care facilities, subject to section 5.05.04. 31
32
5. Educational plants and public schools with an agreement with 33
Collier County, as described in LDC section 5.05.14; however, any 34
high school located in this district is subject to a compatibility review 35
as described in LDC section 10.02.03. 36
37
6. Cluster development that is affordable, subject to: 38
39
(a) Section 4.02.04, Standards for cluster residential design 40
41
(b) Project must qualify as housing that is affordable through a 42
Bonus Density Agreement, Developers Agreement, Impact 43
Fee Deferral Agreement or PUD commitment, which contain 44
a minimum of 20 percent of the overall units as housing that 45
is affordable. 46
47
(c) Project must conform to compatibility standards for housing 48
that is affordable contained in section 4.02.39.C.1. 49
50
DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added
Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted
4
L:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Community Housing Plan Implementation\Initiative 1 - Regulatory Relief\LDC 4.02.39 Design
Deviations for Housing that is Affordable 09-25-20 DSAC.docx
b. Accessory uses. 1
2
1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses 3
permitted as of right in the RMF-6 district. 4
5
2. Private docks and boathouses, subject to section 5.03.06. 6
7
3. Recreational facilities that serve as an integral part of a residential 8
development and have been designated, reviewed and approved 9
on a site development plan or preliminary subdivision plat for that 10
development. Recreational facilities may include, but are not limited 11
to, golf course, clubhouse, community center building and tennis 12
facilities, playgrounds and playfields. 13
14
c. Conditional uses. The following uses are permissible as conditional uses 15
in the RMF-6 district, subject to the standards and procedures established 16
in LDC section 10.08.00. 17
18
1. Churches. 19
20
2. Schools, private. Also, "Ancillary Plants" for public schools. 21
22
3. Child care centers and adult day care centers. 23
24
4. Civic and cultural facilities. 25
26
5. Recreational facilities not accessory to principal use. 27
28
6. Group care facilities (category I and II); care units; nursing homes; 29
assisted living facilities pursuant to § 400.402 F.S. and ch. 58A-5 30
F.A.C; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to § 31
651 F.S. and ch. 4-193 F.A.C.; all subject to section 5.05.04. 32
33
7. Noncommercial boat launch facilities, subject to the applicable 34
review criteria set forth in section 5.03.06. 35
36
8. Cluster development that is market rate, subject to section 4.02.04. 37
38
9. Model homes and model sales centers, subject to compliance with 39
all other LDC requirements, to include but not limited to, section 40
5.04.04. 41
42
10. Public schools without an agreement with Collier County, as 43
described in LDC section 5.05.14. Additional standards in LDC 44
section 5.05.14 shall also apply; however, any high school located 45
in this district is subject to a compatibility review as described in 46
LDC section 10.02.03. 47
48
d. Prohibited animals in residential districts. The following animals are to be 49
considered farm animals and are not permitted to be kept in residential 50
DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added
Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted
5
L:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Community Housing Plan Implementation\Initiative 1 - Regulatory Relief\LDC 4.02.39 Design
Deviations for Housing that is Affordable 09-25-20 DSAC.docx
districts except as provided for in zoning district regulations: turkeys, 1
chickens, ducks, geese, pigs, horses, cows, goats, hogs, and the like. 2
3
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 4
5
4.02.04 - Standards for Cluster Residential Design 6
7
A. The purpose of a cluster development design technique is to provide a unique and 8
innovative alternative to residential development in the RSF 1 through 6, RMF-6, PUD and 9
VR districts by creating a more varied, efficient, attractive, and economical residential 10
development containing a more usable pattern of open space . It is intended to implement 11
the (GMP) by, among other things, encouraging compact urban growth, discouraging 12
urban sprawl, and encouraging the conservation of environmental resources. 13
14
B. This section shall apply to all parcels of land under single ownership within the RSF 1 15
through 6, RMF-6, VR and PUD zoning districts which permit cluster development. See 16
LDC section 2.03.08 A.2 for clustering standards in RFMU receiving lands district. 17
18
C. Conditional uses approved for cluster development and permitted cluster development 19
that is affordable may reduce the lot area, lot width, and yard requirements within a zoning 20
district, subject to the criteria enumerated in this section. The lot area, lot width, coverage, 21
and yard regulations of the residential zoning district in which the cluster development is 22
located shall be used as the basis for all computations of allowed reductions. The following 23
reductions in lot area, lot width, coverage and yard regulations of the underlying zoning 24
district shall be permissible pursuant to the grant of a conditional use for cluster 25
development or administrative approval of a Site Development Plan for cluster 26
development that is affordable and that conforms to compatibility standards for housing 27
that is affordable contained in section 4.02.39.C. as permitted in the RMF-6 zoning district. 28
29
1. The maximum allowable gross density in any cluster development shall not exceed 30
the maximum allowable gross density of the residential zoning district in which the 31
cluster housing development is located. 32
33
2. The following site design and dimensional standards shall apply to cluster 34
development: 35
36
Table 3. Table of Design Standards for Cluster Development. 37
Design Standard
Minimum lot area per single-family unit 3,000 sq. ft.
Minimum lot width
Cul-de-sac lots 20 feet
All other lots 40 feet
Minimum setbacks
Front yard
front entry garage
side entry garage
20 feet
10 feet
Side yards
DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added
Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted
6
L:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Community Housing Plan Implementation\Initiative 1 - Regulatory Relief\LDC 4.02.39 Design
Deviations for Housing that is Affordable 09-25-20 DSAC.docx
zero lot line on one side
no zero lot line
10 feet remaining side
5 feet each side
Rear yard
principal structure
accessory structure
10 feet
3 feet
D. Requirements for zero lot line developments: 1
2
1. The zero (0) lot line portion of the dwelling unit shall be void of doors where such 3
wall is contiguous to an adjoining lot line. 4
5
2. Where the nature of the construction of a residence has provided for zero (0) side 6
yard, footings and roof overhang encroachments may be permitted onto the 7
adjoining lot. A roof drainage system shall be put in place to prevent roof drainage 8
from falling onto the abutting property adjacent the walls of the residence with the 9
zero (0) side yard tolerance. Furthermore, provision shall be made for a three (3) 10
foot easement on the abutting property, which shall be recorded running with the 11
land with the residence enjoying the zero (0) lot side yard, for maintenance 12
purposes. 13
14
3. Roof overhangs shall be prohibited over adjacent property lines, unless a recorded 15
restrictive covenant creating the requisite easement interest for encroachment, 16
maintenance, and repair of the building overhang is an element of the project. 17
18
E. Common open space. 19
20
1. All reductions in the minimum lot area, lot width, and yard requirements below that 21
which would otherwise be required within the district in which the cluster 22
development is located shall be required to provide an equal amount of common 23
open space within the same phase and general area of each cluster of homes in 24
the development unless said cluster development is part of a planned unit 25
development where the open space requirements of this LDC have been satisfied. 26
27
2. Common open space shall be reserved for recreational uses. 28
29
3. Any commercial uses recreational facility subject to membership, registration, 30
fees, or aimed at attracting outside users, shall not be counted as common open 31
space. 32
33
4. The sale, lease, or other disposition of common open space shall be prohibited 34
except to a nonprofit corporation or homeowners' association or other similar entity 35
established under the laws of Florida to administer and maintain the facilities 36
subject to a deed restriction acceptable to the County to limit the use of said 37
property to common open space . Provisions shall be included to assure the 38
continued maintenance of the common open space area. 39
40
5. Access rights to common open space for all residents within the cluster housing 41
development shall be guaranteed. 42
43
DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added
Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted
7
L:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Community Housing Plan Implementation\Initiative 1 - Regulatory Relief\LDC 4.02.39 Design
Deviations for Housing that is Affordable 09-25-20 DSAC.docx
6. Land utilized for common open space shall be restricted to common open space 1
in perpetuity by appropriate legal instruments satisfactory to Collier County. Such 2
instrument shall be binding upon the owner, developer, his successors, and 3
assigns, and shall constitute a covenant running with the land, and be in recordable 4
form. 5
6
F. Additional reduction to the development standards provided at sections 4.02.04 C.—E. 7
may be approved by the Collier County Planning Commission for projects defined as 8
common architectural theme projects. In determining whether or not a project qualifies as 9
a common architectural theme project the BCC shall determine that all of the following 10
design features are incorporated into the project: 11
12
1. The architectural style of the dwelling units/structures shall be similar in design and 13
in the use of materials and color. 14
15
2. The residential project shall have a signature entranceway which serves to identify 16
the development as having a common architectural theme. The entranceway 17
design and improvement elements shall include some or all of the following: the 18
use of landscape materials, gated structure, water features, sculpture, and 19
ornamental pavement surfaces. 20
21
3. Street materials, signage, and lighting shall be complementary and the same 22
throughout the project's accessways. 23
24
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 25
26
4.02.39 – Alternative Design for Housing that is Affordable 27
28
A. The Collier County Growth Management Plan sets a priority on providing housing that is 29
affordable to keep pace with the rate of population growth and the need for housing that 30
is affordable to maintain economic viability within the County. 31
32
B. Alternatives may be granted by the County Manager or designee from design and 33
permitting standards of this LDC listed below to further the objective of increasing supply 34
of housing that is affordable, subject to criteria of Section 4.02.39.C. 35
36
1. Section 3.07.02.E - Local/internal roads that are privately maintained may be 37
designed to the elevation required to meet the 5-year, 1-day storm event, and the 38
perimeter berm shall be designed so that surrounding properties will not be 39
adversely impacted by the project’s influence on stormwater sheet flow up to the 40
elevation during the 25 year, 3-day design storm. 41
42
2. Single-family developments lots which are adjacent to preserve areas or perimeter 43
berms are exempt from providing one canopy tree per 3,000 square feet of 44
pervious open space per lot. For all other lots, the required one canopy tree may 45
be relocated to common areas or to a street tree program. 46
47
3. Sections 6.06.01.S, 10.02.02.A.11 & Appendix B - For all local/internal roads that 48
are privately maintained, alternative design, including inverted crown, may be 49
allowed if the alternative is based on sound engineering practices and the 50
alternative is no less consistent with the health, safety and welfare of abutting 51
DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added
Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted
8
L:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Community Housing Plan Implementation\Initiative 1 - Regulatory Relief\LDC 4.02.39 Design
Deviations for Housing that is Affordable 09-25-20 DSAC.docx
landowners and the general public than the standard typical. The applicants 1
engineer shall request that the County Manager or his designee approve the 2
alternative roadway design, as part of the Site Plan or Subdivision Plan application. 3
The request shall be in writing and accompanied with documentation and 4
justification for the alternate roadway design based on sound engineering 5
principles and practices. 6
7
4. Sections 6.06.02.A.2 & 6.06.02.F - For local/internal sidewalks that are privately 8
maintained, the minimum sidewalk width shall be four feet, which can be of 9
concrete or asphalt material and shall be constructed over a compacted subgrade. 10
Asphalt shall also require a minimum of 4 inches of compacted limerock base, in 11
addition to the compacted subgrade. 12
13
5. Section 10.02.03.A.3 - Three-family housing structures proposed on a lot(s) of 14
record are exempt from the Site Development Plan provisions of LDC Section 15
10.02.03.A.2. 16
17
6. Section 10.02.04.C - For single-family developments, the clubhouse facility may 18
be included within the construction plans and final subdivision plats. 19
20
7. Section 10.02.08.I.2. - The set-aside of land or dedication of land for a public water 21
well at time of rezoning is not required, unless the site is located within a quarter-22
mile of a future raw water transmission main identified in the latest Board-adopted 23
Collier County 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update and in such a 24
way that the quantity of affordable housing units would not be impacted. 25
26
C. Criteria for design deviations for housing that is affordable. The County Manager or 27
designee shall grant requested deviations allowable per Section 4.02.39.B. at time of 28
development permitting when the following criteria are met: 29
30
1. Compatibility. 31
32
a. Setbacks from all project boundaries that abut property zoned or developed 33
for single family residential use shall be a minimum of one foot (setback) 34
per one foot maximum zoned height for principal structures. 35
36
DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added
Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted
9
L:\LDC Amendments\Current Work\Community Housing Plan Implementation\Initiative 1 - Regulatory Relief\LDC 4.02.39 Design
Deviations for Housing that is Affordable 09-25-20 DSAC.docx
b. For projects of more than three units, the required buffer for all project 1
boundaries that abut property zoned or developed for single family 2
residential use shall be a 15 foot wide Type ”B” landscape buffer per LDC 3
Section 4.06.02. 4
5 2. Affordability. To qualify for the design deviations of this section, projects shall 6
meet the requirements and execute one of the following to maintain affordability 7
and contain a minimum of 20 percent of the overall units as housing that is 8
affordable: 9
10
a. Affordable Housing Density Bonus (AHDB) Agreement per Section 11
2.06.00; or 12
13
b. Affordable Housing Impact Fee Deferral Agreement per Code of 14
Ordinances Article IV of Chapter 74; or 15
16
c. PUD commitment or Developer’s Agreement (DA) for units that serve 17
households at the income levels identified in Section 2.06.00, or units that 18
are priced within the limits established in the Collier County Housing 19
Demand Methodology, as updated yearly or Board approved Table of 20
Rental Rates, as updated yearly. 21
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 22
1
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\Oct 07\LDC 5.05.09 Cell Towers in Estates Districts 09-16-20
DSAC.docx
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
PETITION
PL20200001721
SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT
This amendment implements the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP)
to allow cellular towers as a conditional use in the Estates (E) Zoning
District on parcels that are a minimum of 2.25 acres and located adjacent
to collector or arterial roads. It also corrects a few cross references.
LDC SECTIONS TO BE AMENDED
2.03.01 Agricultural Districts
5.05.09 Communication Towers
Origin
Growth Management
Department
HEARING DATES
BCC TBD
CCPC TBD
DSAC 10/07/20
DSAC-LDR 09/15/20
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS
DSAC-LDR
Approval with changes
DSAC
TBD
CCPC
TBD
BACKGROUND
When the GGAMP amendments were adopted in the Growth Management Plan (GMP) on September 24, 2019,
new provisions for various types of conditional uses were added to the Urban and Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-
elements of the GGAMP. One such provision is the “Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria”
– Urban Section (B.1.A.3.e.5.) and Rural Section (B.1.A.3.d.4.). It states the following:
“Conditional Use for a cellular tower is allowed in the Estates Zoning District only on parcels no
smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to a roadway classified within the Transportation Element as
a Collector or Arterial.”
This amendment originated from a solid majority of residents surveyed, both in the rural Estates and the urban
Estates, that had indicated dissatisfaction with existing cellular service. Over 75% of the rural Estates residents
surveyed believed that communication towers should be conditional uses, and available at any locati on in the
Estates. The proposed amendment shall allow cellular service to increase after the approval of new
communication towers.
By LDC section 2.01.03 A 4, communication towers are deemed permitted uses in all zoning districts, except
CON districts, RFMU sending lands, NRPAS, HSAS, and FSAS and “…. limited to those providing wireless
emergency telephone service, subject to all applicable provisions in section 5.05.09 of this Code.” However,
LDC section 5.05.09 G.1 states “….no new tower of any height shall be permitted in the RSF-1 through RSF-6,
RMF- 6, VR, MH, TTRVC and E Zoning districts.” The proposed amendment shall rectify this inconsistency,
put into effect the GGAMP new provision, and provide for new communication towers to be allowed as a
conditional use in the Estates Zoning District.
The Transportation Element of the GMP’s maps depict all of the collector and arterial roads throughout the
County. These roadway maps display where new communication towers can be located. See Exhibit A.
In LDC section 5.05.09 G.1, the cross reference to LDC section 5.05.09 F.7 should read 5.05.09 G.7 which does
address separation requirements and the second cross reference to LDC section 5.05.09 ((F) 3) should read 5.05.09
2
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\Oct 07\LDC 5.05.09 Cell Towers in Estates Districts 09-16-20
DSAC.docx
G 3 which does address essential services sites.
In LDC section 5.05.09 G.3 another scrivener error is corrected by inserting a period after the words “Essential
services-Specified conditional uses”.
DSAC-LDR Subcommittee Recommendations
The DSAC-LDR Subcommittee reviewed the amendment on September 15, 2020 and unanimously recommended
approval with the following changes:
o In 5.05.9 B.25.d, add the following words “The required” to the beginning sentence of “Perimeter wall
or fence height shall be…”;
o Require the wall or fence height to be a “minimum of eight feet from finished grade…” and
o Stipulate the 15 feet landscape buffer shall be a “Type B” landscape buffer and tree plantings within the
buffer be a minimum 12 feet tall to screen the equipment cabinets.
All recommendations have been incorporated in the LDC text. Additionally, staff has made a minor adjustment
to subsection 5.05.09 G.25 b. to help clarify that the service cannot be located outside of the Estates Zoning
District or co-located on an existing tower within an effective radius and provide the same service coverage.
FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS
There are no anticipated fiscal or operational
impacts to the County associated with this
amendment. The amendment can have fiscal
impacts on property owners in the Estates
who will be eligible to apply for Conditional
Use approval of communication towers.
GMP CONSISTENCY
The proposed LDC amendment has been reviewed by
Comprehensive Planning staff and may be deemed
consistent with the GMP.
EXHIBITS: A) GMP Transportation Element Maps
DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added
Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted
3
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\Oct 07\LDC 5.05.09 Cell Towers in Estates Districts 09-16-
20 DSAC.docx
Amend the LDC as follows:
1
2.03.01 – Agricultural Districts. 2
3
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 4
5
B. Estate District (E). The purpose and intent of the estates district (E) is to provide lands for 6
low density residential development in a semi-rural to rural environment, with limited 7
agricultural activities. In addition to low density residential development with limited 8
agricultural activities, the E district is also designed to accommodate as conditional uses, 9
development that provides services for and is compatible with the low density residential, 10
semi-rural and rural character of the E district. The E district corresponds to and 11
implements the estates land use designation on the future land use map of the Collier 12
County GMP, although, in limited instances, it may occur outside of the estates land use 13
designation. The maximum density permissible in the E district shall be consistent with 14
and not exceed the density permissible or permitted under the estates district of the future 15
land use element of the Collier County GMP as provided under the Golden Gate Master 16
Plan. 17
18
1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the 19
uses that are allowable as accessory or conditional uses in the estates district 20
(E). 21
22
a. Permitted uses. 23
24
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 25
26
c. Conditional uses. For Estates zoning within the Golden Gate Estates 27
subdivision, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in the GMP restricts the 28
location of conditional uses. The following uses are permissible as 29
conditional uses in the estates district (E), subject to the standards and 30
procedures established in LDC section 10.08.00: 31
32
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 33
34
8. Essential services, as set forth in LDC subsection 2.01.03 G. 35
36
9. Model homes and model sales centers, subject to compliance 37
with all other LDC requirements, to include but not limited to 38
section 5.04.04. 39
40
10. Ancillary plants. 41
42
11. Public schools without an agreement with Collier County, as 43
described in LDC section 5.05.14. Additional standards in LDC 44
section 5.05.14 shall also apply. 45
46
12. Communication towers up to specified heights, subject to LDC 47
section 5.05.09. 48
49
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 50
DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added
Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted
4
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\Oct 07\LDC 5.05.09 Cell Towers in Estates Districts 09-16-
20 DSAC.docx
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 1
2
5.05.09 – Communication Towers 3
4
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 5
6
G. Development standards for communication towers. 7
8
1. Except to the extent that amateur radio towers, and ground-mounted antennas 9
with a height not to exceed twenty (20) feet, are exempted by subsection 5.05.09 10
herein, no new tower of any height shall be permitted in the RSF-1 through RSF-11
6, RMF-6, VR, MH, TTRVC, and E zoning districts. However, notwithstanding other 12
provisions of this section, including the separation requirements of subsection 13
5.05.09 (F)(7) G.7. below, towers may be allowed to any height as a conditional 14
use in the Estate (E) zoning district only on parcels designated as Urban or Rural 15
Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan or sites 16
approved for a specified essential service listed in subsection 5.05.09 ((F)(3) G.3. 17
below. There shall be no exception to this subsection except for conditional use 18
applications by a government for a governmental use. 19
20
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 21
22
3. Essential services —Specified conditional uses. Except in the RSF-1 through 23
RSF-6, and RMF-6 zoning districts, towers may be allowed to any height as a 24
conditional use on sites approved for a conditional use essential service for any 25
of the following conditional uses: safety service facilities including, but not 26
necessarily limited to, fire stations, sheriff's substation or facility, emergency 27
medical services facility, and all other similar uses where a communications 28
tower could be considered an accessory or logically associated use with the 29
safety service conditional use on the site. In addition, communications towers 30
can be approved as a conditional use for a stand-alone essential service facility, 31
provided the tower is to be owned by, or to be leased to, a governmental entity, 32
and the primary uses of the tower are for governmental purposes. 33
34
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 35
36
7. With the exception of rooftop towers and towers on essential services sites, each 37
new communication tower shall meet the following separation requirements: 38
39
a. Each new tower that exceeds 185 feet in height shall be located not less 40
than two and one-half (2.5) times the height of the tower from all RSF-1 41
through RSF-6, and RMF-6 zoning districts, including PUDs where the 42
adjacent use(s) is/are, or comparable to, the RSF-1 through RSF-6 and 43
RMF-6 zoning districts. If a part of a PUD is not developed, and it is 44
inconclusive whether the part of a PUD area within such minimum 45
separation distance from the proposed tower site may be developed with a 46
density of six (6) units per acre or less, it shall be presumed that the PUD 47
area nearest to the proposed site will be developed at the lowest density 48
possible under the respective PUD. 49
50
DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added
Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted
5
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\Oct 07\LDC 5.05.09 Cell Towers in Estates Districts 09-16-
20 DSAC.docx
b. In addition, each such new tower that exceeds a height of seventy-five (75) 1
feet, excluding antennas, shall be separated from all boundaries of 2
surrounding property zoned RMF-12, RMF-16, E, RT, VR, MH, TTRVC,H, 3
and the residential areas of PUDs with existing or planned densities greater 4
than six (6) units per acre by not less than the total height of the tower 5
including its antennas; and from all other surrounding property boundaries 6
by a distance not less than one-half (1/2) the height of the tower and its 7
antennas, or the tower's certified collapse area, whichever distance is 8
greater. 9
10
c. Communication towers in the Estate (E) zoning district shall be separated 11
from residentially zoned properties as follows: 12
13
i. New towers up to 75 feet in height shall be located not less than the 14
total height of the tower and antennas from all residentially zoned 15
properties. 16
17
ii. New towers over 75 feet in height shall be located not less than two 18
and one-half times the height of the tower and antennas, or the 19
certified collapse area, whichever distance is greater, from all 20
residentially zoned properties. 21
22
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 23
24
25. Communication towers in the Estate (E) Zoning District. 25
26
Communication towers are allowed on parcels designated as Urban or Rural 27
Golden Gate Estates Sub-element in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and are 28
subject to the following: 29
30
a. The parcel is a minimum 2.25 acres and adjacent to an arterial or collector 31
road. 32
33
b. The communication tower cannot be located outside the Estates Zoning 34
District or be co-located on an existing tower within an effective radius and 35
provide the same service coverage. 36
37
c. All security and site lighting shall be less than 20 feet above grade, fully 38
shielded, and directed away from neighboring properties. 39
40
d. Fencing height and landscaping. The required perimeter wall or fence 41
height shall be a minimum of eight feet from finished grade of base 42
supporting structure and no greater than 10 feet. A minimum 15 feet 43
landscape Type B buffer along the perimeter of wall or fence is required 44
and tree plantings within the buffer shall be 12 feet high. 45
46
e. Equipment cabinets. Overall height of ground-mounted equipment or 47
equipment enclosure shall not exceed 12 feet. 48
49
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 50
Exhibit A – GMP Transportation Element Maps
6
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\Oct 07\LDC 5.05.09 Cell Towers in Estates Districts 09-16-
20 DSAC.docx
Exhibit A – GMP Transportation Element Maps
7
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\Oct 07\LDC 5.05.09 Cell Towers in Estates Districts 09-16-
20 DSAC.docx
Exhibit A – GMP Transportation Element Maps
8
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\Oct 07\LDC 5.05.09 Cell Towers in Estates Districts 09-16-
20 DSAC.docx
Exhibit A – GMP Transportation Element Maps
9
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\Oct 07\LDC 5.05.09 Cell Towers in Estates Districts 09-16-
20 DSAC.docx
1
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-07-20
DSAC.docx
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
PETITION
PL20200001602
SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT
This amendment corrects scrivener’s errors and updates cross references
related to various Land Development Code (LDC) sections, the Florida
Statues (F.S.) and Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Chapter and Rule
citations.
LDC SECTIONS TO BE AMENDED
1.08.02 Definitions
2.03.01 Agricultural Districts
2.03.02 Residential Zoning Districts
2.03.03 Commercial Zoning Districts
2.03.05 Civic and Institutional Zoning Districts
2.03.07 Overlay Zoning Districts
2.03.08 Rural Fringe Zoning Districts
4.02.06 Standards for Development within the Airport Overlay (APO)
10.02.03 Requirements for Site Development, Site Improvement Plans and
Amendments thereof
10.02.05 Construction, Approval, and Acceptance of Required
Improvements
10.02.13 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Procedures
Appendix A-Standard Performance Security Documents for Required
Improvements
ORIGIN
Growth Management
Department
HEARING DATES
BCC TBD
CCPC TBD
DSAC 10/07/20
DSAC-LDR 09/15/20
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS
DSAC-LDR DSAC CCPC
Approval TBD TBD
BACKGROUND
Staff has researched and reviewed 2019 Florida Statues and Florida Administrative Code citations for the definition
and use of the terms “Assisted Living Facility” (ALF) and “Family Care Facility” (FCF). The previous referenc ed
citations have been transferred over time and require correction throughout the respective residential and non -
residential zoning districts and the Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay District. The correct F.S. and F.A.C. citations
are listed in a Correction Table. See Exhibit A.
This amendment further corrects scrivener’s errors and cross references in the following LDC sections:
Section 1.08.02: When the F.A.C. Chapter 59 A-36.10 was adopted, the word “supervisors” has been replaced with
“staff” for the definition of “Family Care Facility”, and this change has been made.
Section 2.03.03 D.1.a.26: The word “texture” should read “textile.”
Sections 2.03.08 A.2.a.(4)(b)(ii.a)iv) and 2.03.08 A.2.a.(4)(b)(ii.b)v): The reference to LDC section
4.02.01 should read 4.02.03 which is the appropriate section for the “Specific Standards for Location of
Accessory Buildings and Structures”.
2
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-07-20
DSAC.docx
Section 4.02.06 L.2.a: When Ordinance 19-35 was sent to FDOT for review, the FDOT-Aviation and
Spaceports Office representatives brought a discrepancy to staff’s attention. The correct height is 499 feet
rather than 500 feet, and this change is consistent with the Federal Regulation Title 14, Part 77. See Exhibit
B.
Section 10.02.03 F.5: The reference to LDC section 10.03.06 Q should read LDC section 10.03.06 R,
which is the appropriate section for public notice and required hearings for “Site Plan with Deviations for
Redevelopment”.
Section 10.02.05 B.2.a: The words “Competition Certificate” should read “Completion Certificate.”.
Section 10.02.13 I.: The reference to LDC sections “2.02.12 and 2.02.12D” should read “10.02.13 and
10.02.13 D”.
Appendix A: Florida Statues 117.05 (4) provides for the notarial certificate requirements and F.S. 117.05
(13) provides the templates and acknowledgements in a representative capacity. For each respective
standard performance security document, the notarial acknowledgement is updated and replaced with the
generic notarial certificate requirement for conformity.
FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS
There are no anticipated fiscal or operational
impacts associated with this amendment.
GMP CONSISTENCY
There are no anticipated Growth Management Plan
impacts associated with this amendment.
EXHIBITS: A) F.S. and F.A.C. Correction Table
B) Federal Aviation Administration DOT: 14 CFR Section § 77.17(a)(1)
DRAFT
3
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
Amend the LDC as follows: 1
2
1.08.02 Definitions 3
4
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 5
Assisted living facility: Any building(s), section of a building, distinct part of a building, 6
residence, private home, boarding home, or other place, whether operated for profit or 7
not, which undertakes through its ownership or management to provide for a period 8
exceeding 24 hours, housing, food service, and 1 or more personal services for 4 or more 9
adults, not related to the owner or administrator by blood or marriage, who require such 10
services and to provide limited nursing services, when specifically licensed to do so 11
pursuant to § 400.407 400.062 F.S. A facility offering personal services or limited nursing 12
services for fewer than 4 adults is within the meaning of this definition if it formally or 13
informally advertises to or solicits the public for residents or referrals and holds itself out 14
to the public to be an establishment that regularly provides such services. 15
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 16
Family care facility: A residential facility designed to be occupied by not more than 6 17
persons under care, plus supervisors staff as required by subsection 10A-5.019, FAC 18
ch.59A-36.010, F.A.C. and constituting a single dwelling unit (i.e., adult congregate living 19
facility for: aged persons; developmentally disabled persons; physically disabled or 20
handicapped persons; mentally ill persons; and persons recovering from alcohol and/or 21
drug abuse. Foster care facilities are also included, but not the uses listed under group 22
care facility (category II). This use shall be applicable to single-family dwelling units and 23
mobile homes. 24
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 25
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 26
27
2.03.01 - Agricultural Districts. 28
29
A. Rural Agricultural District (A). The purpose and intent of the rural agricultural district (A) is 30
to provide lands for agricultural, pastoral, and rural land uses by accommodating 31
traditional agricultural, agricultural related activities and facilities, support facilities related 32
to agricultural needs, and conservation uses. Uses that are generally considered 33
compatible to agricultural uses that would not endanger or damage the agricultural, 34
environmental, potable water, or wildlife resources of the County, are permissible as 35
conditional uses in the A district. The A district corresponds to and implements the 36
Agricultural/Rural land use designation on the future land use map of the Collier County 37
GMP, and in some instances, may occur in the designated urban area. The maximum 38
density permissible in the rural agricultural district within the urban mixed use district shall 39
be guided, in part, by the density rating system contained in the future land use element 40
of the GMP. The maximum density permissible or permitted in A district shall not exceed 41
the density permissible under the density rating system. The maximum density permissible 42
in the A district within the agricultural/rural district of the future land use element of the 43
Collier County GMP shall be consistent with and not exceed the density permissible or 44
permitted under the agricultural/rural district of the future land use element. 45
46
1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the 47
uses that are allowable as accessory or conditional uses in the rural agricultural 48
district (A). 49
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 50
DRAFT
4
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
c. Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted as conditional uses in the rural 1
agricultural district (A), subject to the standards and procedures established in LDC 2
section 10.08.00 and the Administrative Code. 3
* * * * * * * * * * * * 4
16. Group care facilities (category I and II); care units; nursing homes; assisted 5
living facilities pursuant to 400.402 429.02 F.A.C.; and continuing care 6
retirement communities pursuant to § 651 F.S. and ch. 4-193 69O-193 7
F.A.C., all subject to LDC section 5.05.04 when located within the Urban 8
Designated Area on the Future Land Use Map to the Collier County Growth 9
Management Plan. 10
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 11
B. Estate District (E). The purpose and intent of the estates district (E) is to provide lands for 12
low density residential development in a semi-rural to rural environment, with limited 13
agricultural activities. In addition to low density residential development with limited 14
agricultural activities, the E district is also designed to accommodate as conditional uses, 15
development that provides services for and is compatible with the low density residential, 16
semi-rural and rural character of the E district. The E district corresponds to and 17
implements the estates land use designation on the future land use map of the Collier 18
County GMP, although, in limited instances, it may occur outside of the estates land use 19
designation. The maximum density permissible in the E district shall be consistent with 20
and not exceed the density permissible or permitted under the estates district of the future 21
land use element of the Collier County GMP as provided under the Golden Gate Master 22
Plan. 23
24
1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the 25
uses that are allowable as accessory or conditional uses in the estates district (E). 26
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 27
c. Conditional uses. For Estates zoning within the Golden Gate Estates 28
subdivision, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in the GMP restricts the 29
location of conditional uses. The following uses are permissible as 30
conditional uses in the estates district (E), subject to the standards and 31
procedures established in LDC section 10.08.00. 32
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 33
5. Group care facilities (category I); care units, subject to the 34
provisions of LDC subsection 2.03.01 B.3.f; nursing homes; 35
assisted living facilities pursuant to § 400.402 429.02 F.S. and ch. 36
58A-5 59A-36 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities 37
pursuant to § 651 F.S. and ch. 4-193 69O-193 F.A.C.; all subject to 38
LDC section 5.05.04. 39
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 40
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 41
42
2.03.02 - Residential Zoning Districts 43
44
A. Residential Single-Family Districts (RSF-1; RSF-2; RSF-3; RSF-4; RSF-5; RSF-6). The 45
purpose and intent of the residential single-family districts (RSF) is to provide lands 46
primarily for single-family residences. These districts are intended to be single-family 47
residential areas of low density. The nature of the use of property is the same in all of 48
these districts. Variation among the RSF-1, RSF-2, RSF-3, RSF-4, RSF-5 and RSF-6 49
DRAFT
5
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
districts is in requirements for density, lot area, lot width, yards, height, floor area, lot 1
coverage, parking, landscaping and signs. Certain structures and uses designed to 2
serve the immediate needs of the single-family residential development in the RSF 3
districts such as governmental, educational, religious, and noncommercial recreational 4
uses are permitted as conditional uses as long as they preserve , and are compatible 5
with the single-family residential character of the RSF district[s]. The RSF districts 6
correspond to and implement the urban mixed use land use designation on the future 7
land use map of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible in the 8
residential single-family (RSF) districts and the urban mixed use land use designation 9
shall be guided, in part, by the density rating system contained in the future land use 10
element of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible or permitted in 11
the RSF district shall not exceed the density permissible under the density rating 12
system, except as permitted by policies contained in the future land use element. 13
14
1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the 15
uses that are allowable as accessory or conditional uses in the residential single-16
family districts (RSF). 17
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 18
c. Conditional uses. The following uses are permissible as conditional uses 19
in the residential single-family districts (RSF), subject to the standards and 20
procedures established in LDC section 10.08.00 21
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 22
7. Group care facilities (category I); care units subject to the provisions 23
of LDC subsection 2.03.02 3.h; nursing homes; assisted living 24
facilities pursuant to § 400.402 429.02 F.S. and ch. 58A-5 59A-36 25
F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to § 26
651 F.S. and ch. 4-193 69O-193 F.A.C.; all subject to LDC section 27
5.05.04. 28
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 29
30
B. Residential Multi-Family-6 District (RMF-6). The purpose and intent of the 31
residentialmulti-family-6 district (RMF-6) is to provide for single-family, two-family and 32
multi-family residences having a low profile silhouette, surrounded by open space, 33
being so situated that it is located in close proximity to public and commercial s ervices 34
and has direct or convenient access to collector and arterial roads on the county major 35
road network. The RMF-6 district corresponds to and implements the urban mixed use 36
land use designation on the future land use map of the Collier County GMP. The 37
maximum density permissible in the RMF-6 district and the urban mixed use land use 38
designation shall be guided, in part, by the density rating system contained in the future 39
land use element of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible or 40
permitted in the RMF-6 district shall not exceed the density permissible under the 41
density rating system, except as permitted by policies contained in the future land use 42
element. 43
44
1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the uses that 45
are allowable as accessory or conditional uses in the RMF-6 district. 46
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 47
c. Conditional uses. The following uses are permissible as conditional uses in the 48
RMF-6 district, subject to the standards and procedures established in LDC section 49
10.08.00. 50
DRAFT
6
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 1
6. Group care facilities (category I and II); care units; nursing homes; assisted 2
living facilities pursuant to § 400.402 429.02 F.S. and ch. 58A-5 59A-36 3
F.A.C; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to § 651 F.S. 4
and ch. 4-193 69O-193 F.A.C.; all subject to LDC section 5.05.04. 5
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 6
C. Residential Multi-Family-12 District (RMF-12). The purpose and intent of the residential 7
multi-family 12 district (RMF-12) is to provide lands for multiple-family residences having 8
a mid-rise profile, generally surrounded by lower structures and open space, located in 9
close proximity to public and commercial services, with direct or convenient access to 10
collector and arterial roads on the county major road network. Governmental, social, and 11
institutional land uses that serve the immediate needs of the multi-family residences are 12
permitted as conditional uses as long as they preserve and are compatible with the mid-13
rise multiple-family character of the district. The RMF-12 district corresponds to and 14
implements the urban mixed use land use designation on the future land use map of the 15
Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible in the RMF-12 district and the 16
urban mixed use land use designation shall be guided, in part, by the density rating system 17
contained in the future land use element of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density 18
permissible or permitted in the RMF-12 district shall not exceed the density permissible 19
under the density rating system, except as permitted by policies contained in the future 20
land use element. 21
22
1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the 23
uses that are allowable as accessory or conditional uses in the residential multi-24
family-12 district (RMF-12). 25
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 26
c. Conditional uses. The following uses are permissible as conditional uses 27
in the residential multiple-family-12 district (RMF-12), subject to the 28
standards and procedures established in LDC section 10.08.00. 29
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 30
6. Group care facilities (category I and II); care units; nursing homes; 31
assisted living facilities pursuant to § 400.402 429.02 F.S. and ch. 32
58A-5 59A-36 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities 33
pursuant to § 651 F.S. and ch. 4-193 69O-193 F.A.C.; all subject to 34
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 35
D. Residential Multi-Family-16 District (RMF-16). The purpose and intent of the 36
residentialmulti-family-16 district (RMF-16) is to provide lands for medium to high density 37
multiple-family residences, generally surrounded by open space, located in close proximity 38
to public and commercial services, with direct or convenient access to arterial and collector 39
roads on the county major road network. Governmental, social, and institutional land uses 40
that serve the immediate needs of the multiple-family residences are permitted as 41
conditional uses as long as they preserve and are compatible with the medium to high 42
density multi-family character of the district. The RMF-16 district corresponds to and 43
implements the urban mixed use land use designation on the future land use map of the 44
Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible in the RMF-16 district and the 45
urban mixed use land use designation shall be guided, in part, by the density rating system 46
contained in the future land use element of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density 47
permissible or permitted in the RMF-16 district shall not exceed the density permissible 48
under the density rating system, except as permitted by policies contained in the future 49
land use element. 50
51
DRAFT
7
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the 1
uses that are allowable as accessory or conditional uses in the residential multi-2
family-16 district (RMF-16). 3
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 4
c. Conditional uses. The following uses are permissible as conditional uses 5
in the residential multiple-family-16 district (RMF-16), subject to the 6
standards and procedures established in LDC section 10.08.00. 7
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 8
6. Group care facilities (category I and II); care units; nursing homes; 9
assisted living facilities pursuant to § 400.402 429.02 F.S. and ch. 10
58A-5 59A-36 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities 11
pursuant to § 651 F.S. and ch. 4-193 69O-193 F.A.C.; all subject to 12
LDC section 5.05.04. 13
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 14
E. Residential Tourist District (RT). The purpose and intent of the residential tourist district 15
(RT) is to provide lands for tourist accommodations and support facilities, and multiple 16
family uses. The RT district corresponds with and implements the urban mixed use district 17
and the activity center district in the urban designated area on the future land use map of 18
the Collier County GMP. 19
20
1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the 21
uses that are allowable as accessory or conditional uses in the residential tourist 22
district (RT). 23
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 24
c. Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted as conditional uses in 25
the residential tourist district (RT), subject to the standards and procedures 26
established in LDC section 10.08.00. 27
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 28
4. Group care facilities (category I and II); care units; nursing homes; 29
assisted living facilities pursuant to § 400.402 429.02 F.S. and ch. 30
58A-5 59A-36 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities 31
pursuant to § 651 F.S. and ch. 4-193 69O-193 F.A.C.; all subject to 32
LDC section 5.05.04. 33
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 34
F. Village Residential District (VR). The purpose and intent of the village residential district 35
(VR) is to provide lands where a mixture of residential uses may exist. Additionally, uses 36
are located and designed to maintain a village residential character which is generally low 37
profile, relatively small building footprints as is the current appearance of Goodland and 38
Copeland. The VR district corresponds to and implements the mixed residential land use 39
designation on the Immokalee future land use map of the Collier County GMP. It is 40
intended for application in those urban areas outside of the coastal urban area designated 41
on the future land use map of the Collier County GMP, though there is some existing VR 42
zoning in the coastal urban area. The maximum density permissible in the VR district and 43
the urban mixed use land use designation shall be guided, in part, by the density rating 44
system contained in the future land use element of the Collier County GMP. The maximum 45
density permissible or permitted in the VR district shall not exceed the density permissible 46
under the density rating system, except as permitted by policies contained in the future 47
land use element, or as designated on the Immokalee future land use map of the GMP. 48
49
DRAFT
8
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the 1
uses that are allowable as accessory or conditional uses in the village residential 2
district (VR). 3
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 4
c. Conditional uses. The following uses are permissible as conditional uses 5
in the village residential district (VR), subject to the standards and 6
procedures established in LDC section 10.08.00. 7
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 8
8. Group care facilities (category I and II); care units; nursing homes; 9
assisted living facilities pursuant to § 400.402 429.02 F.S. and ch. 10
58A-5 59A-36 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities 11
pursuant to § 651 F.S. and ch. 4-193 69O-193 F.A.C.; all subject to 12
LDC section 5.05.04. 13
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 14
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 15
16
2.03.03 - Commercial Zoning Districts 17
18
A. Commercial Professional and General Office District (C-1). The purpose and intent of 19
the commercial professional and general office district C-1 is to allow a concentration of 20
office type buildings and land uses that are most compatible with, and located near, 21
residential areas. Most C-1 commercial, professional, and general office districts are 22
contiguous to, or when within a PUD, will be placed in close proximity to residential 23
areas, and, therefore, serve as a transitional zoning district between residential areas 24
and higher intensity commercial zoning districts. The types of office uses permitted are 25
those that do not have high traffic volumes throughout the day, which extend into the 26
evening hours. They will have morning and evening short-term peak conditions. The 27
market support for these office uses should be those with a localized basis of market 28
support as opposed to office functions requiring inter-jurisdictional and regional market 29
support. Because office functions have significant employment characteristics, which are 30
compounded when aggregations occur, certain personal service uses shall be permitted, 31
to provide a convenience to office-based employment. Such convenience commercial 32
uses shall be made an integral part of an office building as opposed to the singular use 33
of a building. Housing may also be a component of this district as provided for through 34
conditional use approval. 35
36
1. The following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial 37
Classification Manual (1987), or as otherwise provided for within this section are 38
permissible by right, or as accessory or conditional uses within the C-1 commercial 39
professional and general office district. 40
41
a. Permitted uses. 42
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 43
20. Group care facilities (category I and II, except for homeless 44
shelters); care units, except for homeless shelters; nursing homes; 45
assisted living facilities pursuant to § 400.402 429.02 F.S. and ch. 46
58A-5 59A-36 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities 47
pursuant to § 651 F.S. and ch. 4-193 69O-193 F.A.C.; all subject 48
to LDC section 5.05.04. 49
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 50
DRAFT
9
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
B. Commercial Convenience District (C-2). The purpose and intent of the commercial 1
convenience district (C-2) is to provide lands where commercial establishments may be 2
located to provide the small-scale shopping and personal needs of the surrounding 3
residential land uses within convenient travel distance except to the extent that office 4
uses carried forward from the C-1 district will expand the traditional neighborhood size. 5
However, the intent of this district is that retail and service uses be of a nature that can 6
be economically supported by the immediate residential environs. Therefore, the uses 7
should allow for goods and services that households require on a daily basis, as 8
opposed to those goods and services that households seek for the most favorable 9
economic price and, therefore, require much larger trade areas. It is intended that the C-10
2 district implements the Collier County GMP within those areas designated 11
agricultural/rural; estates neighborhood center district of the Golden Gate Master Plan; 12
the neighborhood center district of the Immokalee Master Plan; and the urban mixed use 13
district of the future land use element permitted in accordance with the locational criteria 14
for commercial and the goals, objectives, and policies as identified in the future land use 15
element of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible in the C-2 district 16
and the urban mixed use land use designation shall be guided, in part, by the density 17
rating system contained in the future land use element of the Collier County GMP. The 18
maximum density permissible or permitted in a district shall not exceed the density 19
permissible under the density rating system. 20
21
1. The following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial 22
Classification Manual (1987), or as otherwise provided for within this section are 23
permissible by right, or as accessory or conditional uses within the C-2 24
commercial convenience district. 25
26
a. Permitted uses. 27
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 28
34. Group care facilities (category I and II, except for homeless 29
shelters); care units, except for homeless shelters; nursing homes; 30
assisted living facilities pursuant § 400.402 429.02 F.S. and ch. 31
58A-5 59A-36 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities 32
pursuant to § 651 F.S. and ch. 4-193 69O-193 F.A.C.; all subject to 33
LDC section 5.05.04. 34
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 35
C. Commercial Intermediate District (C-3). The purpose and intent of the commercial 36
intermediate district (C-3) is to provide for a wider variety of goods and services intended 37
for areas expected to receive a higher degree of automobile traffic. The type and variety 38
of goods and services are those that provide an opportunity for comparison shopping, 39
have a trade area consisting of several neighborhoods, and are preferably located at the 40
intersection of two-arterial level streets. Most activity centers meet this standard. This 41
district is also intended to allow all of the uses permitted in the C-1 and C-2 zoning districts 42
typically aggregated in planned shopping centers. This district is not intended to permit 43
wholesaling type of uses, or land uses that have associated with them the need for outdoor 44
storage of equipment and merchandise. A mixed-use project containing a residential 45
component is permitted in this district subject to the criteria established herein. The C-3 46
district is permitted in accordance with the locational criteria for commercial and the goals, 47
objectives, and policies as identified in the future land use element of the Collier County 48
GMP. The maximum density permissible in the C-3 district and the urban mixed use land 49
use designation shall be guided, in part, by the density rating system contained in the 50
future land use element of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible or 51
DRAFT
10
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
permitted in the C-3 district shall not exceed the density permissible under the density 1
rating system. 2
3
1. The following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial 4
Classification Manual (1987), or as otherwise provided for within this section are 5
permissible by right, or as accessory or conditional uses within the commercial 6
intermediate district (C-3). 7
8
a. Permitted uses. 9
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 10
41. Group care facilities (category I and II, except for homeless 11
shelters); care units, except for homeless shelters; nursing homes; 12
assisted living facilities pursuant to § § 400.402 429.02 F.S. and ch. 13
58A-5 59A-36 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities 14
pursuant to § 651 F.S. and ch. 4-193 69O-193 F.A.C.; all subject to 15
LDC section 5.05.04. 16
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 17
D. General Commercial District (C-4). The general commercial district (C-4) is intended to 18
provide for those types of land uses that attract large segments of the population at the 19
same time by virtue of scale, coupled with the type of activity. The purpose and intent of 20
the C-4 district is to provide the opportunity for the most diverse types of commercial 21
activities delivering goods and services, including entertainment and recreational 22
attractions, at a larger scale than the C-1 through C-3 districts. As such, all of the uses 23
permitted in the C-1 through C-3 districts are also permitted in the C-4 district. The outside 24
storage of merchandise and equipment is prohibited, except to the extent that it is 25
associated with the commercial activity conducted on-site such as, but not limited to, 26
automobile sales, marine vessels, and the renting and leasing of equipment. Activity 27
centers are suitable locations for the uses permitted by the C-4 district because most 28
activity centers are located at the intersection of arterial roads. Therefore, the uses in the 29
C-4 district can most be sustained by the transportation network of major roads. The C-4 30
district is permitted in accordance with the locational criteria for uses and the goals, 31
objectives, and policies as identified in the future land use element of the Collier County 32
GMP. The maximum density permissible or permitted in a district shall not exceed the 33
density permissible under the density rating system. 34
35
1. The following uses, as defined with a number from the Standard Industrial 36
Classification Manual (1987), or as otherwise provided for within this section are 37
permissible by right, or as accessory or conditional uses within the general 38
commercial district (C-4). 39
40
a. Permitted uses. 41
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 42
26. Business services - miscellaneous (7381, 7389 - except 43
auctioneering service, automobile recovery, automobile 44
repossession, batik work, bottle exchanges, bronzing, cloth cutting, 45
contractors' disbursement, cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton 46
sampler, directories-telephone, drive-away automobile, exhibits-47
building, filling pressure containers, field warehousing, fire 48
extinguisher, floats-decoration, folding and refolding, gas systems, 49
bottle labeling, liquidation services, metal slitting and shearing, 50
packaging and labeling, patrol of electric transmission or gas lines, 51
DRAFT
11
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
pipeline or powerline inspection, press clipping service, recording 1
studios, repossession service, rug binding, salvaging of damaged 2
merchandise, scrap steel cutting and slitting, shrinking textiles, 3
solvent recovery, sponging textiles, swimming pool cleaning, tape 4
slitting, texture textile designers, textile folding, tobacco sheeting, 5
and window trimming service). 6
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 7
64. Group care facilities (category I and II, except for homeless 8
shelters); care units, except for homeless shelters; nursing homes; 9
assisted living facilities pursuant to § 400.402 429.02 F.S. and ch. 10
58A-5 59A-36 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities 11
pursuant to § 651 F.S. and ch. 4-193 69O-193 F.A.C.; all subject to 12
LDC section 5.05.04. 13
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 14
E. Heavy Commercial District (C-5). In addition to the uses provided in the C-4 zoning district, the 15
heavy commercial district (C-5) allows a range of more intensive commercial uses and services 16
which are generally those uses that tend to utilize outdoor spac e in the conduct of the business. 17
The C-5 district permits heavy commercial services such as full-service automotive repair, and 18
establishments primarily engaged in construction and specialized trade activities such as contractor 19
offices, plumbing, heating and air conditioning services, and similar uses that typically have a need 20
to store construction associated equipment and supplies within an enclosed structure or have 21
showrooms displaying the building material for which they specialize. Outdoor storage y ards are 22
permitted with the requirement that such yards are completely enclosed or opaquely screened. The 23
C-5 district is permitted in accordance with the locational criteria for uses and the goals, objectives, 24
and policies as identified in the future land use element of the Collier County GMP. 25
26
1. The following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial 27
Classification Manual (1987), or as otherwise provided for within this section are 28
permissible by right, or as accessory or conditional uses within the heavy 29
commercial district (C-5). 30
31
a. Permitted uses. 32
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 33
76. Group care facilities (category I and II, except for homeless 34
shelters); care units, except for homeless shelters; nursing homes; 35
assisted living facilities pursuant to § 400.402 429.02 F.S. and ch. 36
58A-5 59A-36 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities 37
pursuant to § 651 F.S. and ch. 4-193 69O-193 F.A.C.; all subject to 38
LDC section 5.05.04. 39
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 40
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 41
42
2.03.05 - Civic and Institutional Zoning Districts 43
44
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 45
B. Community Facility District (CF). The purpose and intent of (CF) district is to implement 46
the GMP by permitting nonresidential land uses as generally identified in the urban 47
designation of the future land use element. These uses can be characterized as public 48
facilities, institutional uses, open space uses, recreational uses, water-related or 49
dependent uses, and other such uses generally serving the community at large. The 50
dimensional standards are intended to insure compatibility with existing or future nearby 51
DRAFT
12
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
residential development. The CF district is limited to properties within the urban mixed use 1
land use designation as identified on the future land use map. 1. 2
3
1. The following uses are permitted as of right, or as accessory or conditional uses, 4
in the community facility district (CF). 5
6
a. Permitted uses. 7
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 8
5. Nursing homes, assisted living facilities (ALF) pursuant to § 9
400.402 429.02 F.S. and ch. 58A-5 59A-36., family care facilities, 10
group care facilities (category I) and continuing care retirement 11
communities pursuant to § 651 F.S. and ch. 4-193 69O-193 F.A.C.; 12
all subject to LDC section 5.05.04. 13
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 14
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 15
16
2.03.07 - Overlay Zoning Districts 17
18
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 19
H. Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay District (SBCO). Special conditions for properties 20
abutting the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard and the west side of 55th Terrace 21
S.W., as referenced in the Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Map (Map 7) of the 22
Golden Gate Area Master Plan. This is referenced as figure 2.03.07 H. below. 23
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 24
6. The following uses, as identified within the latest edition of the Standard Industrial 25
Classification Manual, or as otherwise provided for within this section, are 26
permitted as of right, or as uses accessory to permitted primary or secondary 27
uses, or are conditional uses within the Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay 28
District. 29
30
a. Permitted uses. 31
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 32
39. Group care facilities (category I and II, except for homeless 33
shelters); care units , except for homeless shelters; nursing 34
homes; assisted living facilities pursuant to § 400.402 429.02 F.S. 35
and ch. 58A-5 59A-36 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement 36
communities pursuant to F.S. § 651 and ch. 4-193 § 651 F.S. and 37
ch. 69O-193 F.A.C.; all subject to LDC section 5.05.04. 38
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 39
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 40
41
2.03.08 - Rural Fringe Zoning Districts 42
43
A. Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District (RFMU District). 44
* * * * * * * * * * * * 45
2. RFMU receiving lands. RFMU receiving lands are those lands within the RFMU 46
district that have been identified as being most appropriate for development and 47
to which residential develop ment units may be transferred from RFMU sending 48
lands. Based on the evaluation of available data, RFMU receiving lands have a 49
lesser degree of environmental or listed species habitat value than RFMU 50
sending lands and generally have been disturbed through d evelopment or 51
DRAFT
13
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
previous or existing agricultural operations. Various incentives are employed to 1
direct development into RFMU receiving lands and away from RFMU sending 2
lands, thereby maximizing native vegetation and habitat preservation and 3
restoration. Suc h incentives include, but are not limited to: the TDR process; 4
clustered development; density bonus incentives; and, provisions for central 5
sewer and water. Within RFMU receiving lands , the following standards shall 6
apply, except as noted in LDC subsection 2.03.08 A.1. above, or as more 7
specifically provided in an applicable PUD. 8
9
a. Outside rural villages. 10
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 11
(4) Design Standards. 12
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 13
(b) Clustered development: 14
* * * * * * * * * * * * 15
ii. Minimum yard requirements 16
17
a) single-family. Each single-family lot or parcel 18
minimum yard requirement shall be 19
established within an approved PUD, or shall 20
comply with the following standards: 21
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 22
iv) Accessory: Per LDC section 4.02.01 23
4.02.03. 24
25
b) multi-family. For each multi-family lot or 26
parcel minimum yard shall be established 27
within an approved PUD, or shall comply with 28
the following standards: 29
* * * * * * * * * * * * 30
v) Accessory: LDC section 4.02.01 31
4.02.03. 32
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 33
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 34
35
4.02.06 - Standards for Development within the Airport Overlay (APO) 36
37
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 38
L. Other areas. In addition to the height limitations imposed in LDC sections 4.02.06 (C)-(K) 39
above, no structure or obstruction will be permitted within Collier County that would cause 40
a minimum obstruction clearance altitude (MOCA), a minimum descent altitude (MDA), 41
decision height (DH), or a minimum vectoring altitude (MVA) to be raised nor which would 42
impose either the establishment of restrictive minimum climb gradients or nonstandard 43
takeoff minimums. 44
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 45
2. Except as otherwise provided in this section of the LDC, no structure, or object of 46
natural growth shall be erected, altered, allowed to grow or be maintained, which 47
is or would result in a potential hazard to air navigation within Collier County by 48
exceeding any of the following: 49
50
DRAFT
14
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
a. A height of 500 499 feet above ground level at the site of the object. 1
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 2
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 3
4
10.02.03 - Requirements for Site Development, Site Improvement Plans and Amendments 5
thereof 6
7
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 8
F. Site plan with deviations for redevelopment projects. 9
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 10
5. Public notice. Public notice of the hearing shall be as required by the LDC section 11
10.03.06 Q R and Chapter 6 of the Administrative Code. 12
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 13
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 14
15
10.02.05 - Construction, Approval, and Acceptance of Required Improvements 16
17
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 18
B. Preliminary Acceptance of Required Subdivision Improvements by the County Engineer 19
or designee. Preliminary acceptance by the County Engineer or designee shall identify 20
that the subdivision or development is substantially safe for public occupancy. 21
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 22
2. Submittal requirements. Upon completion of all required improvements contained 23
in the approved construction plans, the applicant's professional engineer of record 24
shall provide the following materials for the review by the County Engineer or 25
designee: 26
27
a. Competition Completion Certificate. The applicant's professional engineer 28
of record shall submit a completion certificate for the required 29
improvements completed. The completion certificate shall be based on 30
information provided by the project professional surveyor and mapper and 31
the engineer's own observations. The completion certificate shall not be 32
based on "information provided by the contractor. "The applicant's 33
professional engineer of record shall document that the required 34
improvements have been installed in compliance with the approved 35
construction plans. Any discrepancy shall be brought to the attention of the 36
County Engineer or designee and resolved to the satisfaction of the County 37
Engineer or designee. 38
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 39
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 40
41
10.02.13 - Planned Unit Development (PUD) Procedures 42
43
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 44
I. Applicability. All applications for either a PUD rezoning or an amendment to an existing 45
PUD document or PUD master plan submitted after January 8, 2003, shall comply with 46
the amended procedures set forth in LDC section 2.02.12 10.02.13 of this Code. All PUDs 47
existing and future, shall comply with the sunset provisions established pursuant to LDC 48
section 2.02.12 10.02.13 D. of this Code. 49
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 50
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 51
DRAFT
15
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
1
APPENDIX A- STANDARD PERFORMANCE SECURITY DOCUMENTS FOR REQUIRED 2
IMPROVEMENTS 3
4
The following specimen forms are to be used as a guide for preparation of bonding 5
instruments which will be submitted to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners for 6
guaranteeing the completion of required improvements with respect to this Code. Adherence to 7
the forms will assure an expeditious review by the Development Services Division and the 8
Collier County Attorney's Office. Deviation in substance or form from the suggested specimen 9
forms may result in a substantial delay or disapproval of the bonding provisions for Required 10
Improvements by the Development Services Division or the County Attorney's Office. These 11
specimen forms may be revised from time to time by resolution of the Board of County 12
Commissioners. 13
14
Appendix A consists of the following specimen forms: 15
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 16
A.1. Subdivision Improvements 17
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 18
b. The Performance Bond shall be substantially as follows: 19
* * * * * * * * * * * * 20
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this PERFORMANCE BOND 21
to be executed this ___ day of ________. 22
WITNESSES: (Owner Name and Title if Corporation)
By:___________
_____ _____
Printed Name Printed Name/Title
(Provide Proper Evidence of Authority)
_____
Printed Name
23
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 24
STATE OF ___________ 25
COUNTY OF ___________ 26
THE FOREGOING PERFORMANCE BOND WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY______ 27
OF ________, 20___, BY (NAME OF ACKNOWLEDGER) AS (TITLE) OF (NAME OF COMPANY) WHO 28
IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME, OR HAS PRODUCED ___________ AS IDENTIFICATION. 29
Notary Public - State of ___________ 30
(SEAL) 31
___________ 32
Printed Name 33
34
Notarial Acknowledgement 35
Per Requirements of § 117.05, Florida Statutes 36
37
DRAFT
16
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
STATE OF [state]__ _ 1
COUNTY OF [county]___ 2
3
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ☐ physical presence or ☐ 4
online notarization, this day of [year] , by [name of person] as [type of authority, e.g. 5
president or vice president] for [legal name of entity] , who ☐ is personally known or ☐ 6
has produced [type of identification] as identification. 7
8
[signature of Notary Public] _ 9
10
[the notary public’s official seal] 11
12
[printed name of Notary Public] 13
14
WITNESSES: (Surety Name and Title if Corporation)
_____ By: _____
Printed Name Printed Name/Title
(Provide Proper Evidence of Authority)
_____
Printed Name
15
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 16
STATE OF ___________ 17
COUNTY OF ___________ 18
THE FOREGOING PERFORMANCE BOND WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY 19
______OF ________, 20___, BY (NAME OF ACKNOWLEDGER) AS (TITLE) OF (NAME OF 20
COMPANY) WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME, OR HAS PRODUCED ___________ AS 21
IDENTIFICATION. 22
Notary Public - State of ___________ 23
(SEAL) 24
___________ 25
Printed Name 26
Notarial Acknowledgement 27
Per Requirements of § 117.05, Florida Statutes 28
29
STATE OF [state]__ _ 30
COUNTY OF [county]___ 31
32
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ☐ physical presence or ☐ 33
online notarization, this day of [year] , by [name of person] as [type of authority, e.g. 34
president or vice president] for [legal name of entity] , who ☐ is personally known or ☐ 35
has produced [type of identification] as identification. 36
37
[signature of Notary Public] _ 38
39
DRAFT
17
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
[the notary public’s official seal] 1
2
[printed name of Notary Public] 3
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 4
A.2. Excavation Improvements 5
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 6
b. The Performance Bond for Excavation Work shall be substantially as follows: 7
* * * * * * * * * * 8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this PERFORMANCE BOND to be 9
executed this ______ day of ____________, 20____. 10
WITNESSES: (Owner Name and Title if Corporation)
_____ By: _____
Printed Name Printed Name/Title
(Provide Proper Evidence of Authority)
_____
Printed Name
11
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 12
STATE OF ___________ 13
COUNTY OF ___________ 14
THE FOREGOING PERFORMANCE BOND WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY______ 15
OF ________, 20___, BY (NAME OF ACKNOWLEDGER) AS (TITLE) OF (NAME OF COMPANY) WHO 16
IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME, OR HAS PRODUCED ___________ AS IDENTIFICATION. 17
Notary Public - State of ___________ 18
(SEAL) 19
___________ 20
Printed Name 21
Notarial Acknowledgement 22
Per Requirements of § 117.05, Florida Statutes 23
24
STATE OF [state]__ _ 25
COUNTY OF [county]___ 26
27
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ☐ physical presence or ☐ 28
online notarization, this day of [year] , by [name of person] as [type of authority, e.g. 29
president or vice president] for [legal name of entity] , who ☐ is personally known or ☐ 30
has produced [type of identification] as identification. 31
32
[signature of Notary Public] _ 33
34
[the notary public’s official seal] 35
36
[printed name of Notary Public] 37
38
DRAFT
18
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
WITNESSES: (Owner Name and Title if Corporation)
_____ By: _____
Printed Name Printed Name/Title
(Provide Proper Evidence of Authority)
_____
Printed Name
1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 2
STATE OF ___________ 3
COUNTY OF ___________ 4
THE FOREGOING PERFORMANCE BOND WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS _____ DAY 5
OF ________, 20___, BY (NAME OF ACKNOWLEDGER) AS (TITLE) OF (NAME OF COMPANY) WHO 6
IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME, OR HAS PRODUCED ___________ AS IDENTIFICATION. 7
Notary Public - State of ___________ 8
(SEAL) 9
___________ 10
Printed Name 11
Notarial Acknowledgement 12
Per Requirements of § 117.05, Florida Statutes 13
14
STATE OF [state]__ _ 15
COUNTY OF [county]___ 16
17
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ☐ physical presence or ☐ 18
online notarization, this day of [year] , by [name of person] as [type of authority, e.g. 19
president or vice president] for [legal name of entity] , who ☐ is personally known or ☐ 20
has produced [type of identification] as identification. 21
22
[signature of Notary Public] _ 23
24
[the notary public’s official seal] 25
26
[printed name of Notary Public] 27
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 28
A.3. Early Work Improvements 29
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 30
b. The Performance Bond for Early Work shall be substantially as follows: 31
* * * * * * * * * * * * 32
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this PERFORMANCE BOND to be 33
executed this _____ day of ____________, 20____. 34
WITNESSES: (Owner Name and Title if Corporation)
_____ By:___________
DRAFT
19
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
Printed Name Printed Name/Title
(Provide Proper Evidence of Authority)
_____
Printed Name
1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 2
STATE OF ___________ 3
COUNTY OF ___________ 4
THE FOREGOING PERFORMANCE BOND WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS______DAY 5
OF ________, 20___, BY (NAME OF ACKNOWLEDGER) AS (TITLE) OF (NAME OF COMPANY) WHO 6
IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME, OR HAS PRODUCED ___________ AS IDENTIFICATION. 7
Notary Public - State of ___________ 8
(SEAL) 9
___________ 10
Printed Name 11
Notarial Acknowledgement 12
Per Requirements of § 117.05, Florida Statutes 13
14
STATE OF [state]__ _ 15
COUNTY OF [county]___ 16
17
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ☐ physical presence or ☐ 18
online notarization, this day of [year] , by [name of person] as [type of authority, e.g. 19
president or vice president] for [legal name of entity] , who ☐ is personally known or ☐ 20
has produced [type of identification] as identification. 21
22
[signature of Notary Public] _ 23
24
[the notary public’s official seal] 25
26
[printed name of Notary Public] 27
WITNESSES: (Owner Name and Title if Corporation)
_____ By: _____
Printed Name Printed Name/Title
(Provide Proper Evidence of Authority)
_____
Printed Name
28
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 29
STATE OF ___________ 30
COUNTY OF ___________ 31
DRAFT
20
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
THE FOREGOING PERFORMANCE BOND WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ______DAY 1
OF ________, 20___, BY (NAME OF ACKNOWLEDGER) AS (TITLE) OF (NAME OF COMPANY) WHO 2
IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME, OR HAS PRODUCED ___________ AS IDENTIFICATION. 3
Notary Public - State of ___________ 4
(SEAL) 5
___________ 6
Printed Name 7
Notarial Acknowledgement 8
Per Requirements of § 117.05, Florida Statutes 9
10
STATE OF [state]__ _ 11
COUNTY OF [county]___ 12
13
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ☐ physical presence or ☐ 14
online notarization, this day of [year] , by [name of person] as [type of authority, e.g. 15
president or vice president] for [legal name of entity] , who ☐ is personally known or ☐ 16
has produced [type of identification] as identification. 17
18
[signature of Notary Public] _ 19
20
[the notary public’s official seal] 21
22
[printed name of Notary Public] 23
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 24
A.4. Site Development Plan Improvements 25
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 26
b. The Performance Bond for Site Development Plans shall be substantially as 27
follows: 28
* * * * * * * * * * * * 29
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this PERFORMANCE BOND to be 30
executed this _____ day of ____________, 20____. 31
WITNESSES: (Owner Name and Title if Corporation)
By:___________
_____
Printed Name Printed Name/Title
(Provide Proper Evidence of Authority)
_____
Printed Name
32
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 33
STATE OF ___________ 34
COUNTY OF ___________ 35
DRAFT
21
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
THE FOREGOING PERFORMANCE BOND WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ______DAY 1
OF ________, 20___, BY (NAME OF ACKNOWLEDGER) AS (TITLE) OF (NAME OF COMPANY) WHO 2
IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME, OR HAS PRODUCED ___________ AS IDENTIFICATION. 3
Notary Public - State of ___________ 4
(SEAL) 5
___________ 6
Printed Name 7
Notarial Acknowledgement 8
Per Requirements of § 117.05, Florida Statutes 9
10
STATE OF [state]__ _ 11
COUNTY OF [county]___ 12
13
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ☐ physical presence or ☐ 14
online notarization, this day of [year] , by [name of person] as [type of authority, e.g. 15
president or vice president] for [legal name of entity] , who ☐ is personally known or ☐ 16
has produced [type of identification] as identification. 17
18
[signature of Notary Public] _ 19
20
[the notary public’s official seal] 21
22
[printed name of Notary Public] 23
WITNESSES: (Owner Name and Title if Corporation)
_____ By: _____
Printed Name Printed Name/Title
(Provide Proper Evidence of Authority)
_____
Printed Name
24
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 25
STATE OF ___________ 26
COUNTY OF ___________ 27
THE FOREGOING PERFORMANCE BOND WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ______DAY 28
OF ________, 20___, BY (NAME OF ACKNOWLEDGER) AS (TITLE) OF (NAME OF COMPANY) WHO 29
IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME, OR HAS PRODUCED ___________ AS IDENTIFICATION. 30
Notary Public - State of ___________ 31
(SEAL) 32
___________ 33
Printed Name 34
Notarial Acknowledgement 35
Per Requirements of § 117.05, Florida Statutes 36
37
STATE OF [state]__ _ 38
COUNTY OF [county]___ 39
40
DRAFT
22
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ☐ physical presence or ☐ 1
online notarization, this day of [year] , by [name of person] as [type of authority, e.g. 2
president or vice president] for [legal name of entity] , who ☐ is personally known or ☐ 3
has produced [type of identification] as identification. 4
5
[signature of Notary Public] _ 6
7
[the notary public’s official seal] 8
9
[printed name of Notary Public] 10
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 11
# # # # # # # # # # # # 12
EXHIBIT A
23
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
F.S. and F.A.C. Correction Table 1
2
LDC Section or Zoning District-
Term/Use
Prior Citation Updated
Citation
LDC 1.08.02 Definitions:
Assisted Living Facility 400.407 F.S. 400.62 F.S.
Family Care Facility 10A-5019 F.A.C. 59A-36.00 F.A.C.
LDC Zoning Districts: A, E, RSF-1
through 6, RMF-6, RMF-12, RMF-16,
RT, VR, C-1 through C-5, CF and the
Overlay Zoning District for SBCO.
Assisted Living Facility 400.402 F.S. 429.02 F.S.
58A-5 F.A.C. 59A-36 F.A.C.
Continuing Care Facilities 4-193 F.A.C. 69O-193 F.A.C.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
EXHIBIT B
24
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2020\October 7\2020 Scrivener Errors and Cross References 10-
07-20 DSAC.docx
Federal Aviation Administration DOT: 14 CFR Part 77, Subpart C § 77.17 1
2
Ann P. Jennejohn
From: MillPatricia <Patricia.Mill@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 12:11 PM
To: (jessica@davidsonengineering.com);AhmadJay; Amelia Vasquez (Amelia@CBIA.net);
AshkarSally; ashton_h;AuclairClaudine; Barnwelllan; BeddowShar; BelloneJoseph;
bellows_r; BowmanMagaly; BurkeRose; Michale Choate; ChmelikTom; ClarkeBoyleSonie;
CohenThaddeus; CritchfieldHoward; KinaszczukDanette; Darla Letourneau;
david.durrell@comcast.net; DavidsonColleen; Eloy Ricardo
(ericardo@northcollierfire.com); FeyEric; FrantzJeremy; FrenchJames; GosselinLiz;
GuitardDonna; HansonShawn; HenderlongRichard; Crowndevelopment@cdiflorida.com;
IsonSara; Jenny Gasperson (nolenspermitting@gmail.com);JohnsonEric; Kathy Curatolo
(Kathy@CBIA.net); KovenskyKenneth; kurtz_g; LantzLorraine; LintzSean; longrichard;
MarcellaJeanne; AcevedoMargarita; McKennaJack; McLeanMatthew; Minutes and
Records; OssorioMichael; Patterson_a; PerezLemay; RicardoEloy;
RMCGINNIS.CMC@GMAIL.COM; SanchezSilvia; ScottTrinity; SerranoMarlene; Shar
Beddow; Shawn Hanson (shanson@gnfire.org); SummersEllen;Teresa L. Cannon; Tom
Wegwert (twegwert@comcast.net);Valerie Gembecki (gulflifepermitting@gmail.com);
VanBlaricom, Rachel M;WalshJonathan;wiley_r;ZunzuneguiDaniel
Subject: 10/7/2020 DSAC Meeting
Attachments: September 2020 DSAC Report.pdf; Capital Project Planning - Map 2008.pdf; Code
Enforcement - DSAC Report for October 2020 Meeting Mid.pdf
Hello,
Attached please find three additional read-aheads for the meeting today that I did not have in time to include in the
packet I sent last week.
Please let me know if you have any questions.Thank you.
Respectfully,
Trish Mill
Operations Analyst
CAI' County
Operations&Regulatory Management Division
Patricia.Mill@colliercountyfl.gov
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104
Phone:239.252.8214
The Operations& Regulatory Management Division wants to hear from you! Please take our online SURVEY. We
appreciate your feedback!
Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not
send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing.
1
September 2020
Monthly Statistics
19/2020 Growth Management Department
Building Plan Review Statistics
9/2020 Growth Management Department 2
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-204,246 4,651 3,831 3,141 4,215 3,791 4,407 4,729 5,027 4,278 4,426 4,355 3,939 4,374 3,622 3,309 4,106 4,114 4,666 3,948 4,093 4,932 4,687 4,760 4,450 All Permits Applied by Month
Aluminum
Structure, 227
Bldg
Add/Alt,
269
Fire Alarms, 63
Bldg New
1 & 2 Res,
400
Fence, 147
Electrical,
311
Gas, 217
Mechanical,
624
Plumbing,
200Pool,
217
Roof,
491
ROW Residential, 126
Shutters/Doors/
Windows, 578
Fire Alarm
Monitoring, 53
Well Permits, 119
Top 15 of 35 Building Permit Types Applied
Building Plan Review Statistics
9/2020 Growth Management Department 3
$-
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
Sep-18Dec-18Mar-19Jun-19Sep-19Dec-19Mar-20Jun-20Sep-20Monthly 1 & 2 Family Total
Construction Value by Applied Date
1&2 Family
$-
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
Sep-18Dec-18Mar-19Jun-19Sep-19Dec-19Mar-20Jun-20Sep-20Monthly Multi-family & Commercial Total
Construction Value by Applied Date
Multi-family Commercial
$-
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-20Monthly Total Construction Value by Applied Date
1&2 Family Multi-family Commercial
Building Plan Review Statistics
49/2020 Growth Management Department
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-20Sep-
18
Oct-
18
Nov-
18
Dec-
18
Jan-
19
Feb-
19
Mar-
19
Apr-
19
May-
19
Jun-
19
Jul-
19
Aug-
19
Sep-
19
Oct-
19
Nov-
19
Dec-
19
Jan-
20
Feb-
20
Mar-
20
Apr-
20
May-
20
Jun-
20
Jul-
20
Aug-
20
Sep-
20
Commercial 8 6 4 4 4 5 4 6 7 8 3 11 9 8 15 5 9 4 7 4 5 7 5 6 3
Multi-family 18 12 6 2 7 6 6 7 5 3 3 15 7 8 6 4 11 9 9 9 5 2 10 10 11
1&2 Family 223 213 232 194 316 218 261 251 254 250 274 263 285 306 235 182 232 234 250 192 205 196 234 296 248
New Construction Building Permits Issued by Month
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Sep-18Nov-18Jan-19Mar-19May-19Jul-19Sep-19Nov-19Jan-20Mar-20May-20Jul-20Sep-20New Multi-family Building
Permits Issued by Month
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Sep-18Nov-18Jan-19Mar-19May-19Jul-19Sep-19Nov-19Jan-20Mar-20May-20Jul-20Sep-20New Commercial Building
Permits Issued by Month
Building Inspections Statistics
9/2020 Growth Management Department 5
Electrical, 3,705
Gas,
848
Land
Development,
1,380
Septic,
149
Mechanical, 1,642
Structural, 8,503
Well, 105
Plumbing, 3,041
ROW,
518
Pollution Control, 5
Types of Building Inspections
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-2021168264192138020750214212293023011242452400521934224432366722382266452276022545233552124923333202311872020971204022003019899Building Inspections
Land Development Services Statistics
9/2020 Growth Management Department 6
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-20128 159 144 126 150 163 145 181 152 159 156 167 131 147 128 142 122 145 129 148 134 145 144 174 173 All Land Development Applications Applied by Month
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Site Development
Plan Insubstantial
Change
Vegetation
Removal Permit
Zoning Verification
Letter
Lot Split Utility Conveyance
Final Acceptance
116
100 99
54
46
Top 5 Land Development Applications Applied
within the Last 6 Months
Land Development Services Statistics
9/2020 Growth Management Department 7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-2035342717393028242720282531361514182721121730191223Pre-application Meetings by Month
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-2040 56 35 26 40 34 26 27 29 32 16 21 34 24 35 43 36 21 31 9 25 27 22 20 16 68666459545068595954546960765063615227193853536175Front Zoning Counter Permits Applied by Month
Temporary Use Commercial Certificates
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-203 3
2
4
3 3 3
2
1
2
3
1 1
6
4
2
1
3
4
3
2
3
0
2
1
Number of New Subdivisions Recorded per Month
Numberof SubdivisionsLand Development Services Statistics
9/2020 Growth Management Department 8
Yearly
Totals
2018 -43
2019 -31
2020 -19
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-2012
19
13 12 9
13 14
6 4
27
17
4 2
16 14
5 4
17
54
9 7
13
0
14 15Number of PagesPlat Pages Recorded per Month
Yearly
Totals
2018 -192
2019 -131
2020 -133
Land Development Services Statistics
9/2020 Growth Management Department 9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-2010846699126610441175127649621110Monthly Total of Subdivision Applications
(PSPA, PSP, PPL, PPLA, ICP, FP, CNST) by Month
-
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-2014 11 12 8 15 10 10 11 17 9 15 8 12 14 7 18 9 9 11 6 10 7 11 10 14 Monthly Total of Subdivision Re-submittals/Corrections
(PSPA, PSP, PPL, PPLA, ICP, FP, CNST) by Month
Land Development Services Statistics
9/2020 Growth Management Department 10
-
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-2038 34 30 32 32 34 28 38 36 34 37 37 28 26 33 24 40 45 32 38 27 30 37 42 45 Monthly Total of Site Plan Applications
(SIP, SIPI, SDP, SDPA, SDPI, NAP) by Month
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-2025493438273754494749515145583546263634384229333345Monthly Total of Site Plan Re-submittals/Corrections
(SIP, SIPI, SDP, SDPA, SDPI, NAP) by Month
Reviews for Land Development Services
9/2020 Growth Management Department 11
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-20916 1,127 987 876 891 929 1,105 1,076 1,232 1,062 1,109 1,114 1,074 1,150 883 1,037 832 954 1,093 812 807 929 1,081 888 1,120 Number of Land Development Reviews
99.5
0.5
Percentage Ontime for the Month
Ontime Late
Land Development Services Statistics
9/2020 Growth Management Department 12
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-20Total Applied Construction Valuation Estimate
Construction Estimate Utility Estimate
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-20Inspections per monthSite & Utility Inspections
Final Subdivision Inspection Final Utility Inspection
Preliminary Subdivision Inspection Preliminary Utility Inspection
Tie In Inspection
Sep-
18
Oct-
18
Nov-
18
Dec-
18
Jan-
19
Feb-
19
Mar-
19
Apr-
19
May-
19
Jun-
19
Jul-
19
Aug-
19
Sep-
19
Oct-
19
Nov-
19
Dec-
19
Jan-
20
Feb-
20
Mar-
20
Apr-
20
May-
20
Jun-
20
Jul-
20
Aug-
20
Sep-
20
North Collier 42 83 55 37 43 51 48 44 46 57 50 35 60 69 50 56 57 39 48 38 36 33 42 33 47
Collier County(Greater Naples)47 56 54 60 77 63 66 82 72 71 66 76 59 66 63 63 57 72 62 48 62 62 52 61 59
Fire Review Statistics
9/2020 Growth Management Department 13
Total Number of Building Fire Reviews by Month
Total Number of Planning Fire Reviews by Month
Fire District
Fire District
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-20DaysBuilding Fire Review Average Number of Days
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Sep-20DaysPlanning Fire Review Average Number of Days
Sep-
18
Oct-
18
Nov-
18
Dec-
18
Jan-
19
Feb-
19
Mar-
19
Apr-
19
May-
19
Jun-
19
Jul-
19
Aug-
19
Sep-
19
Oct-
19
Nov-
19
Dec-
19
Jan-
20
Feb-
20
Mar-
20
Apr-
20
May-
20
Jun-
20
Jul-
20
Aug-
20
Sep-
20
North Collier 563 608 432 419 471 447 596 645 711 729 725 709 621 688 488 470 410 458 633 565 510 642 645 564 558
Collier County (Greater Naples)296 453 447 325 421 327 475 443 395 339 386 426 365 481 388 359 476 361 397 355 324 462 418 409 400
August 22, 2020 – September 21, 2020 Code Cases by Category
This report reflects monthly data from August 22, 2020 – September 21, 2020
Code Enforcement Division Monthly Report
August 22, 2020 – September 21, 2020 Highlights
• Cases opened: 853
• Cases closed due to voluntary compliance: 489
• Property inspections: 3011
• Lien searches requested: 1451
Trends
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20
785
671
893
502
630 580
821
945
854 806
995
853
Cases Opened Per Month
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20
3306
3034
3240
2620
2374
2594
2870
3273
3839
3304
3553
3011
Code Inspections Per Month
August 22, 2020 – September 21, 2020 Code Cases by Category
This report reflects monthly data from August 22, 2020 – September 21, 2020
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
2019 2020
3756
44494702
3429
Origin of Case
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Bayshore Immokalee
29 96
1210
1642 CRA
Case Opened
Monthly
August 22, 2020 – September 21, 2020 Code Cases by Category
This report reflects monthly data from August 22, 2020 – September 21, 2020
Case Type Common issues associated with Case Type
Accessory Use – Fence permits, fence maintenance, canopies, shades, guesthouse renting etc.
Animals – Prohibited animals, too many animals, etc.
Commercial - Shopping carts
Executive Order – Emergency/Executive Mask Order 2020-06
Land Use – Prohibited land use, roadside stands, outdoor storage, synthetic drugs, zoning issues, etc.
Noise - Construction, early morning landscaping, bar or club, outdoor bands, etc.
Nuisance Abatement – Litter, grass overgrowth, waste container pits, exotics, etc.
Occupational Licensing – Home occupation violations, no business tax receipts, kenneling. etc.
Parking Enforcement - Parking within public right-of-way, handicap parking, etc.
Property Maintenance - Unsanitary conditions, no running water, green pools, structure in disrepair, etc.
Protected Species - Gopher Tortoise, sea turtles lighting, bald eagles, etc.
Right of Way - Construction in the public right-of-way, damaged culverts, obstruction to public right-of-way,
etc.
Signs - No sign permits, illegal banners, illegal signs on private property, etc.
Site Development -Building permits, building alterations, land alterations, etc.
Temporary Land Use - Special events, garage sales, promotional events, sidewalk sales, etc.
Vegetation Requirements – Tree maintenance, sight distance triangle, tree pruning, land clearing, landfill,
preserves, etc.
Vehicles - License plates invalid, inoperable vehicles, grass parking, RV parking, other vehicle parking
etc.
Animals
1%Accessory Use
1%Executive Order
7%
Land Use
8%
Noise
1%
Nuisance Abatement
37%
Occupational Licensing
2%
Parking Enforcement
6%
Property Maintenance
9%
Right of
Way
5%
Signs
2%
Site Development
7%
Vehicles
13%
Vegetation Requirements
2%
July 22, 2020 – August 21, 2020 Code Cases by Category
This report reflects monthly data from August 22, 2020 – September 21, 2020
Case Type Common Issues Associated with Case Type
Accessory Use – Fence permits, fence maintenance, canopies, shades, guesthouse renting etc.
Animals – Prohibited animals, too many animals, etc.
Commercial - Shopping carts
Land Use – Prohibited land use, roadside stands, outdoor storage, synthetic drugs, zoning issues, etc.
Noise - Construction, early morning landscaping, bar or club, outdoor bands, etc.
Nuisance Abatement – Litter, grass overgrowth, waste container pits, exotics, etc.
Occupational Licensing – Home occupation violations, no business tax receipts, kenneling. etc.
Parking Enforcement - Parking within public right-of-way, handicap parking, etc.
Property Maintenance - Unsanitary conditions, no running water, green pools, structure in disrepair, etc.
Protected Species - Gopher Tortoise, sea turtles lighting, bald eagles, etc.
Right of Way - Construction in the public right-of-way, damaged culverts, obstruction to public right-of-way,
etc.
Signs - No sign permits, illegal banners, illegal signs on private property, etc.
Site Development -Building permits, building alterations, land alterations, etc.
Temporary Land Use - Special events, garage sales, promotional events, sidewalk sales, etc.
Vegetation Requirements – Tree maintenance, sight distance triangle, tree pruning, land clearing, landfill,
preserves, etc.
Vehicles - License plates invalid, inoperable vehicles, grass parking, RV parking, other vehicle parking
etc.
Animals
1%Accessory Use
2%Land Use
5%Noise
1%
Nuisance
Abatement
38%
Occupational Licensing
2%
Parking Enforcement
5%
Property Maintenance
7%
Right of Way
7%
Signs
6%
Site Development
8%
Vehicles
16%
Vegetation Requirements
2%
June 22, 2020 – July 21, 2020 Code Cases by Category
This report reflects monthly data from August 22, 2020 – September 21, 2020
Case Type Common Issues Associated with Case Type
Accessory Use – Fence permits, fence maintenance, canopies, shades, guesthouse renting etc.
Animals – Prohibited animals, too many animals, etc.
Commercial - Shopping carts
Land Use – Prohibited land use, roadside stands, outdoor storage, synthetic drugs, zoning issues, etc.
Noise - Construction, early morning landscaping, bar or club, outdoor bands, etc.
Nuisance Abatement – Litter, grass overgrowth, waste container pits, exotics, etc.
Occupational Licensing – Home occupation violations, no business tax receipts, kenneling. etc.
Parking Enforcement - Parking within public right-of-way, handicap parking, etc.
Property Maintenance - Unsanitary conditions, no running water, green pools, structure in disrepair, etc.
Protected Species - Gopher Tortoise, sea turtles lighting, bald eagles, etc.
Right of Way - Construction in the public right-of-way, damaged culverts, obstruction to public right-of-way,
etc.
Signs - No sign permits, illegal banners, illegal signs on private property, etc.
Site Development -Building permits, building alterations, land alterations, etc.
Temporary Land Use - Special events, garage sales, promotional events, sidewalk sales, etc.
Vegetation Requirements – Tree maintenance, sight distance triangle, tree pruning, land clearing, landfill,
preserves, etc.
Vehicles - License plates invalid, inoperable vehicles, grass parking, RV parking, other vehicle parking
etc.
Animals
1%Accessory Use
1%Land Use
7%Noise
1%
Nuisance Abatement
44%
Occupational Licensing
1%
Parking Enforcement
5%
Property
Maintenance
8%
Right of
Way
5%
Signs
4%
Site Development
8%
Vehicles
12%
Vegetation
Requirements
3%
14.A.2
Development Services Advisory Committee
Attendance Roster — Date: October 7, 2020
DSAC Members
**Must have (8) members for a quorum**
James Boughton:
Norman Gentry:
Remote, via Zoom
Remote, via Zoom
Clay Brooker:
Mark McLean:
Remote, viai�mii EXCUSED
Remote, via Zoom
Jeffrey Curl:
Chris Mitchell:
Remote, via Zoom
%Sz17 f (/It — DOW11 Clod 001 Si fi Tfi
Laura Spurgeon DeJohn:
Robert Mulh e:
Remote, via Zoom
Remote, via Zoom
David Dunnavant:
Jeremy Sterk:
Remote, via Zoom
Remote, via Zoom
John English:
Mario Valle:
Remote, via Zoom
Marco Espinar:
William Varian: `
Remote, via Zoom
Blair Foley:
Remote, via Zoom
Staff Members
James French
Deputy Department Head, GMD
Michael Ossorio
Director, Code Enforcement
Jay Ahmad
Transportation Engineering and/or Transportation Planning
Tom Chmelik or designee
Public Utilities
Ken Kovensky
Director, Operations & Regulatory Management
Matt McLean
Director, Development Review
Patricia Mill, Operations Analyst,
Staff Liaison, Operations & Regulatory Management
Parvwc t %-& & Dtaw .C'y. d
Packet Pg. 228
fUOSInpV saolnaaS ;uawdolanaa : OEM) -lVNld 10313ed epua6V OVSCI OZOZ `L aago;oo :;uawt43ejjv
C
M
au
L
In
x
c
O
c�
G
U
}J
V)
M
a)
4-
O
O
l0
M
O
Ln
r-I
w
r�
M
n
n
n
—
n
n
U
C
C
4
C
C
�
O
�
O
Z)
tb
13)
'in
C
N
'in
Ln
Ln
M
M
In
M
M
M
M
M
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
io
In
io
io
io
io
io
w
ri
ri
ri
ri
ri
ri
ri
ri
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
E
o
0
a
a
C
0
0
D
b0
>
>
a'
Of
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
v
�
J
J
l0
00
N
�t
0)
M
00
I-
O
Il
15:
O
O
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
In
C
O
r�-I
r�-I
r�-I
r�-I
r�-I
r�
-I
r- I
c�-I
+J
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
C)
C)O
O
a1
a)
cv
H
H
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C:�
V
E
O
O
Q
00
O
U
U
O
O
bA
tM
U
O
O
—_
�,
O
O
O
O
O
ai
E
w
E
A
U
-av
O
>
C
C
@j
aJ
I=�
`J
U
C
bA
H
NO
a1
>
ai
tw
7
i
E
M
O
O
O
E
CJ
CJ
E
-
�
+1
ri
C
C
CO
O
bA
a1
7
O
N
_N
—
C
—
0
C
4-CJ
a1
O
(SS
•�
3
(SS
O
4
L
E
C)
VI
L
U
E
a,
0
E
v
E
v
.Q
o
Q
W
`1
i
W
O
O
.0
N
CO
U
W
M
r-I
O
O
M
@
N
-
C
C
73
tw
O
L�
V)
a)
O
M
O
aJ
O
(V
N
E
aaii
aaii
N
M
lO
a1
a1
LA
LA
COiD
i
E
E
m
u
7
Q
vn
Q
vn
00
N
00
c
00
z
�n
z
>,
�
L.L.
c-I
M
QJ
C
a!
m
m
C
aiaiL
L
v
E
>
L
a1
E
O
4--
(A
4--
ai
00
J
J
�'
CO
`41n
cu
L
O
[6
O 0
—
v
a)
C
>
V)
a
C
a,
E
Q
a%
fB
0
O
-0
4-
O
aJ
o
_0
D)
-O
U
E
+(3)
a)
0
aJ
0
0
�
a1
m
�
a1
a1
a1
a1
a1
a)
a1
fUOSIAPV saolnaaS ;uawdolanaa : OEM) -lVNld 10313ed epua6V OVSCI OZOZ `L aago;oo :;uawt43ejjv
Ln
m
Ln
It
00
;1-
m
N
N
1.0
r-I
I-
Ln
;1-
00
;1-
lD
lD
N
lD
�t
l0
N
r-
Ln
lD
l0
l0
m
m
m
m
00
m
r"
rn
r1
I.D
m
r1
m
m
m
m
O
O
71
O
15:
O
IN
N
m
In
O
Ln
O
O
O
O
110
lD
Ln
I'D
m
l0
m
m
m
m
W
m
l0
l0
l0
l0
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
r-I
r-I
r-I
r-I
r1
r1
r1
r1
11
-1
11
11
11
r1
r1
r1
m
r1
Ln
Ol
O
O
a)
Il
0)
r1
m
�t
0)
m
w
O
Ln
O
Ln
Ln
O
O
Ln
fV
N
m
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
O
4
Ln
4
4
Ln
Ln
Li
Ln
Ln
4
4
�i
Ln
Li
c-I
c-I
c-I
c-I
r1
c-I
c-I
r1
r1
r1
r1
c-I
c-I
r1
r1
r1
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
c-I
c-I
c-I
r-I
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
r1
i
Ov
U
O
O
E
E
E
E
-
>
>
>
>
U
N
O
O
O
O
c
c
�
c
O
Ov
O
L
O_
>
Q
iO
Q
iO
Q
iO
Q
is
O
L
O
L
O
L
O
L
i
C
O
>
4)
>
(U
LJE
N
O
-O
L
L
L
L
`J
cOJ
N
UJ
UJ
N
o
bp
O
(:�,
:
C:
LO
E
L/
t
>
V)
��.
7
O)
%
aA
>
5
(i
>�
+
0
�J
O
0
[0
Q)
[0
Q)
[0
Q)
(0
�
O
>
>
>
LJ
>
>
c
O
C
0
O
-O
O
E
c
OU
U
U
U
U
U
1
41
E
LL
>
o
LL
>
o
LL
>
o
LL
>
o
i
i
a,
E
t6
L
c
7
°'
co
`
O
E
E
E
E
c
O
aA
aA
a0
a0
-
I
.v
o
.�
E
_
E
E
E
E
E
awn
u
Li
Li
Li
w
Li
w
o
o
>
ro
C
4-1
,�
Eco
O
�
C
C
C
C
4L
O
>
L
N
w
C
c
a
co
co
co
m
co
J
aU.+
(n
J
U
J
U
J
U
J
U
(j
i
LU
N
C
>-
O
co
N
N
N
N
c
m
E
c
E
LL.
LL.
LL.
LL.
L
L
m(cZi
L
L
(cZi
L
(cu
L
(cZi
L
U
U
U
U
>
�'
JO
c
c
c
c
c
Z
LU
LU
LU
LU
N
h
h
N
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
fUOSIAPV saolnaaS ;uawdolanaa : OEM) -lVNld 10313ed epua6V OVSCI OZOZ `L aago;oo :;uawt43ejjv
Ln
M
00
N
00
c-I
l0
c-I
Ln
lD
I-
I?
O
15:
15:
O
O
Ln
Ln
Ln
c-I
c-I
c-I
c-I
c-I
c-I
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
-1
c-I
c-I
c-I
c-I
c-I
Ln
O
Ln
N
Ln
O
N
Ln
Ln
Ln
clzT-I
cLn-I
cLn
-I
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
c-I
rl
ci
c-I
c-I
rl
4J
4J
O
O
Q
cv
Q
cv
i
N_
O
U
U
E
c
c
u
@C)
O
U
O
W
ac
LL
ac
!
C
o
>
dA
O
O
O
O
p
3
O
L
L
C
:
C
N
.L
i`
O
-
O
U
O
O
U
O
1
7
O
i
[6
N
C
[0
C
7
C
C
O
O
t
1]A
t
1]0
L
E
—
O
O
C
3
co
co
7
p
ac)
acce
p
U
C
C
N
p
a
N
N
h
N
N
N