Backup Documents 09/20/2006 LDC
BCC/LDC
BACK-UP
DOCUMENTS
SEPTEMBER 20, 2006
. -.~ ~'"_."'_""'"''''_'''''''__''''''~_''''''"m...~~_"___
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted.
Bold text indicates a defined term
LDC Amendment Request
ORIGIN: Community Development and Environmental Services Division
AUTHOR: Stan Chrzanowski, P.E.
DEP ARTMENT: Engineering Review
AMENDMENT CYCLE #: Cycle 1,2006
LDC PAGE: LDC4:65
LDC SECTION: Section 4.03.05 Subdivision Design Requirements
CHANGE: Adding a maximum limitation to the height ofresidential single-family house
fill pads.
REASON: 1. Fill is expensive, and lately in short supply for all uses. 2. There are, at present,
many limitations on how Iowa fill pad can be constructed, but no limitations on how high. 3.
With side slope requirements, high fill pads get very wide and interfere with drainage. 4. If the
County adopts BFE freeboard requirements, the alternative design solutions may be more cost
effective that high fill pads.
FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMP ACTS: See REASON #4 above. Fiscal impacts depend on
the availability and cost of fill as opposed to the type of alternative design used. In most cases,
under present codes, we are sure that the cost of the alternative solution will be more.
Operational impacts include better stormwater runoff flow, fewer compaction problems with
thinner pads, and fewer fill trucks hauling fill.
RELATED CODES OR REGULATIONS: Sec.22-26.0f the Code of Laws and
Ordinances:Adoption and amendment of the Florida Building Code. Amendment:Chapter 1 of
the Florida Building Code, Administration, is hereby amended, as follows: Section 104.2.1.2.8
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT: None
OTHER NOTESNERSION DATE: This version was created 7 Apr 06. Revised August 30.
Amend the LDC as follows:
1.08.02 Definitions
House pad: The fill placed on the original ground of a lot upon which a house with an attached
garage is built; as differentiated from yard, driveway, detached garage or drain field fill pads.
85
C:\Documents and Settings\chrzanowski_s\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK4CF\4 03 05 house pads (040706) SC.doc
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Text strikethrough is current text to be delotea.
Bold text indicates a defined term
4.03.05 Subdivision Design Requirements
A. Blocks. The length, width and shape of blocks shall be determined with due regard to:
1. Zoning requirements as to lot size and dimensions.
2. Need for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of vehicular and
pedestrian traffic.
3. Limitations and opportunities of topography, including all natural and preserved
features identified.
4. Where special topographical conditions exist, block lengths greater than 660 feet
shall be approved by the County Manager or designee pursuant to procedures
set forth in Chapter 10. Traffic calming devices, as approved in the
Neighborhood Traffic Management Program, shall be provided in block lengths
greater than 660 feet.
B. House Pad Heiqht Requirements. All Residential Sinqle-Familv (RSF) homes
constructed within recorded or unrecorded subdivisions that do not have both a South
Florida Water Manaaement District (SFWMD) Surface Water Manaaement (SWM)
Permit or Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) and a central (backbone)
stormwater runoff collection and water Qualitv treatment system (e.q. includinq but not
limited to swales and lakes or retention areas) shall onlv build fill pads to a maximum
elevation of 18 inches above the elevation of the crown of the paved street or 24 inches
above the elevation of the crown of the unpaved street at the driveway entrance to the
home. The side slopes of the fill pad can be no steeper than 1 vertical unit to 4
horizontal units.
1. Anv first floor beinq built hiqher than what can be set on that house pad must
sit on a stem wall. or piles, or columns with footinqs, or any similar such desiqn
that does not require a wider fill pad.
2. Exceptions to this section can be souoht based on a site stormwater retention
desiqn done bv a Professional Enoineer, licensed in the State of Florida.
showinq that the site has sufficient water Qualitv retention and water Quantitv
attenuation on site to prevent the sheddinq of excess runoff onto neiqhborino
properties and showino that flood plain compensation has been achieved.
86
C:\Documents and Settings\chrzanowski_s\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK4CF\4 03 05 house pads (040706) SC.doc
The following pages contain illustrations of a Developer controlling the
HOA and, in my opinion, giving promises and not accomplishing promises
made to homeowners, BCC, CCPC and delegating to HOA responsibilities
that the Developer promised they would do. These examples show the need
to immediately approve and implement the LDC Amendment
Respectfully submitted:
Leonard F. Nolan, Jr.
18030 Bluewater Drive
Naples FI, 34114
239-403-4782
lennynolan@comcast.net
Royal Palm Golf Estates a/kIa Boyne South
Summary of three examples:
1. Future tennis facility
a. Current status; dropped from the development plans.
2. Clubhouse with fitness/recreation area for residents
a. Current status; dropped from the development, replace with a
conventionlbusiness center.
3. Surface water drainage correction
a. CCPC Meeting Aug 2004 p.4S
i. Mr. Hermanson "All of the piping in the project will be rebuilt; we
will have a much better plumbing system. The owner has agreed to
maintain all the roads and all of the drainage systems"
b. BCC Meeting Sep 21 2004
i. Mr. Yovanovich p.147 "we're really going to spend a lot of money
to bring this community up to current codes..."
11. P .148 "We agreed that the golf course owner would be responsible
for all the lake maintenance and that would not be an association
expense for the homeowners"
c. Statements made to secure the SFWMD permit # 11-02383-p
i. Hole Montes letter of April 2 2004 first paragraph "The existing
outfall structures will not be altered and will continue to function in
the same manner as originally constructed"
11. Hole Montes letter of October 28, 2004 p.3 "We believe the increased
lake acreage and improved system piping will alleviate the pumping
from the two portable pumps during the wet season." "The flood
routings previously submitted did not include the two portable pumps
and the site was able to flow effectively without the additional
pumping."
d. BCC Meeting Sep 21 2004 p.161
i. Chairman Fiala concluding comments after the board approved "I
think you're going to be doing some great things for everybody
that lives in there. It sounds like it's a great improvement now to
what-you know, what has been going on, so-"
11. Mr. Yovanovich: "that's the plan. Thank you."
e. Current status; after taking $67,000 from the HOA Capital Contribution
Account, prior to any board meeting approving the expenditure, an
assessment was sent on June 12,2006 to a subset of homeowners for
$1,324.72 per assessable lot, totaling an additional $218,578.80.
,---
Developer Promises
.-:
~
::.1
o
fJJ
~
=
,.....
u
~
---
o
~
'J"1
-QJ
..
~
~
r-z"
--i
!) Q)
e 8 00
O...'l'l "'t' ~ In
= g Inoo
-~r--
..... I M
=-.:t~ I
i ....('f")o-.~.
, r- 0\
. ~ti~t-;.
::t: ~ M 0\
.1, Cf3 tj N M
b'N' >. - .. t'~
o ~ ~ ..
~,,~Z5~
~ f~
<<:t
00
"
.
~
1
.:J
"..,:;
.P
~,
rI
C.
~~
~ -: .~
$oi
.:1-\,f~l
J ~ '11,
_ 'Y
~ !
;. '--'
\.J
i
~
c-
,..
It)
~
~
~
tt
~
~
:J
~
~
...
-=t
~
~
~
""
M
....
(")
~
1(J
E ~
~
~
~
-i-l
~
.-c
;j <
0:
o ~ "i"
-= lr. ~
~ C' -:=;. -t
t:t >_1 := 1",' ':..1
\J ,.;..:: --t' r' I --,
~ r~, Lr. t'" J
o ,...., ~' ;!.:'
~ LL ~ ,.-:'
>- :-;: ~ r; ;r
I-.../J c:.. ,', "I
(", ('j ;.::: :,
.... r:~./ ;:
tr, ,,-,.~ ~ ..
.x.. 3: -.'
.'0-
CCPC MEETING AUG 2004
August 19, 2004
course but it is not a requirement. Furthermore, they must be members to use the golf
course.
Mr. Scbiffer: What lots are part of the PUD and what lots are zoned?
Mr. Y ovanovich indicates the map to illustrate the answer to this question.
George Hermanson assists with answering the question.
Mr. Murray asks for more clarification of the map displays.
Mr. Hermanson continues indicating the display to clarify information.
Mr. Hermanson: The project has been there since the mid seventies. It was constructed
before the South Florida Water Management District existed. We are going through the
permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District. We are increasing
the lakes from 51 to 72 acres (indicating visual display to point out lakes). All of the
piping in the project will be rebuilt; we will have a much better plumbing system. The
owner has agreed to maintain all the roads and all of the drainage systems. The county
has never maintained the roads; the developer and the property association have been
maintaining them. The county does not maintain the water; however they do maintain the
sewer,
Mr. Murray: There is a discrepancy in the general description that indicates 3 miles
where the staff report indicates 5 miles.
Regarding common area maintenance and landscaping requirements, is the property
owners association responsible for that as it would seem to be written? I would expect
that the developer would usually be responsible for that.
Mr. Yovanovicb: The property owners association will maintain all of the
improvements after it is turned over by the developer. There will be an assessment and
that will be turned over to the property owners.
I did want to clarify one thing; we do have a current petition in to vacate the roads. The
county has never maintained them. Weare asking to essentially create a gated
community which is another benefit to the community. The cost to maintain the roads
will be passed over to the property owners through the association.
Mr. Murray: With regards to model homes use, is that conditional use in this situation?
Mr. Duane: There was no language in the prior PUD that pertained to model homes.
Mr. Yov8novich: We have tied the provision to the LDC.
45
August 19, 2004
use on the roads, the gate, the sewer systems and other items. The roads are in desperate
need of repair. The dump trucks are driving on them all the time, It's growth, but why
are we expected to repair them? We do have a lot of sewer problems there that connects
from the existing lots that they may have sold. Why does the association pick up the
price of the sewer taps and not the developer?
I bought the two lots across from the cul-de-sac. I literally brought my wife out there and
picked them out. I paid top dollar, did not try to nickel anybody down, it was the asking
price. I committed a lot of money and time and built the house according to the view.
They say it's only a football field away, but when I bought it was much bigger. If you go
out there the views are stellar. Even a compromise would be nice.
David Elliot: Mr. Heberlin was prepared to address you but unfortunately he had surgery
scheduled for this afternoon. I have his prepared statement and I would like to read it to
you.
'My name is Richard J. Heberlin. For the past four years my wife Margaret and I have
lived at 1831 Greenwood Drive in the PUD under discussion this afternoon. I am a
retired state licensed general contractor who built quality, upscale homes for over 20
years on Marco Island and in Naples. It was my intention to close out my career by
developing what was then known as Naples Shores Country Club in conjunction with the
principals who owned the land at that time. My company purchased six lots and took
options on two groups of twelve more each in preparation for this project. I followed the
history of the project with the stages of Big Cypress Country Club, Royal Palm Golf
Estates and Naples Shores Country Club and felt the time had come to introduce this
diamond in the rough to the general public.
To describe the saga of this misadventure would be more than the time I allotted. Suffice
to say that the Naples Shores Country Club was not to be and the Boyne Corporation took
over in 1992. Boyne started right off and probably would have been successful if
September 11, 200 I had not adversely affected their development in Petarsky, Michigan.
Needing cash for that endeavor, Boyne sold the Naples property to the principals who
now own it as Naples Golf Club South. Not one of the previous owners, including Boyne
Corporation ever demonstrated the dedication, commitment, vision or personal
involvement that the current developers have demonstrated.
For this reason, my wife and I, as well as 17 other landowners, whose endorsing letters I
have here, are in full support of all the upgrades that the developer has proposed and
requested in this PUD revision. Does anything that they have requested mean they have
the potential of making more money? Of course it does. They are business people and
deserve to be rewarded for their efforts. But everything they are proposing also improves
the property and increases the value to the present and future owners and residents and
upgrades the whole image presented to potential buyers. Just think, no motel, no multi
family residents, improved drainage, a gated community and a large clubhouse. Sure
they'll be some sub-division changes, but to the few objectors who think their views will
49
August 19, 2004
be compromised, may I suggest that they actually walk the property and plant some white
visible markers where the new cul-de-sacs will end. There will be some compromise to
their views. It will not be a significantly negative impact. The closest any residence will
be to the yard of the concerned property owners is over 500 feet. The views will be over
waters and fairways. Having endured the frustration and heartache, not to mention the
financial loss that my wife and I have had over 16 years of previous ownership we are
beating down the doors to get this POO approved so that the completion of a beautiful,
affordable golf community can proceed as soon as possible.'
Linda Gutierrez: I personally own 3 lots in Naples Golf Club South and pay taxes and
property association fees. I also represent Gulf Stream Homes, a builder in that area and
we currently have over 30 contracts for new homes out there. Property values have more
than doubled since they have taken over the community.
Willard Giansanti: I have three lots and my nephew has a lot as well. There are
families in the development now. It is not an elderly golfing community. I know some
people are upset because they are not going to have a larger view. Changes have to be
taken in the golf course because it is a dangerous course. The golf course is wet and it
has s~me drainage problems. Boyne South is a deed restricted area. No sheds, no fences
and I don't even know if you are allowed to have a playground in your yard. The lakes
are part of the golf course; why would the residents maintain the lakes? Ninety percent of
the traffic is going to be golfers. I would hope that the golf course itself, which is a
separate entity, has a large responsibility for the maintenance because it is going to impact
a lot of the maintenance. I'm in favor of the project; Ijust want some stipulations as to
what is going to happen. If this is going to be a new improvement area, it should be
treated as a new POO, which in most cases, the amenities go in first.
Summary Comments bv the Petitioner
Mr. Yovanovich: Just so everybody understands, the residents pay $500 per year and the
difference is paid by the developer and the owner of the golf course. It is being
subsidized quite a bit already for the ongoing maintenance. We don't have a problem
with agreeing to maintain the lakes as part of the golf course.
Mr. Richardson: Currently, it is $500 per year for the residents. How long is that going
to continue and what is the cap?
Mr. Y ovanovich: They basically pay $40 per month and that includes cable television so
there. is quite a subsidy right now. When the residents totally take over there will not be a
developer to subsidize. The golf course has committed to take care of the lake
maintenance issues. I am committing to that right now on record.
We will make the same commitment to take one of our lots to make a neighborhood lot.
50
BCC MEETING SEP 2004
September 21, 2004
change what was formerly the motel site to a multi-family site. We
would be going from 64 motel/hotel units to 34 multi-family units, and
we want to convert what was formally a multi-family site to a
single-family site.
And in doing that, we are essentially increasing the project from
154 residential units to 171 residential units. So the additional 17
residential units is the conversion from 64 hotel units.
In order to accomplish this, we're going to be doing a whole lot
of other things with the PUD. One, we're going to be -- I think Mr.
Lewis can take you through in greater detail. Weare going to be
reconfiguring the golf course. The way it's laid out -- and I don't
know if any of you have played the golf course.
The way its laid out now, you actually-- when you hit some shots
off the tee, you could cut the comer and go over some homes, if you're
skilled or not, and you'll get over the house; if you're not skilled, you'll
go into the house.
So we're attempting to reconfigure the golf course to where it
makes more sense and it's more playable and it takes the homes out of
play.
And in doing that, we'll be spending a tremendous amount of
money to upgrade the golf course. And in doing that, we will actually
increase -- we will improve the drainage for golf course and actually
improve the drainage for the existing homes.
And Mr. Hermanson can take you through the details of how -- in
addressing changes to the golf course, we'll be improving the drainage
for the community, the existing homes, as well as proposed future
homes.
Essentially we'll be increasing the lake area by about 20 acres,
21, 22 acres of actual lake area to accommodate and assist in the
drainage.
We will also be renovating the clubhouse and bringing that --
expanding that, and if you want greater detail of that, Mr. Boughton
Page 146
September 21, 2004
can talk to you about the increase of the square footage of the golf --
of the clubhouse.
And in order to accomplish all of this, we are, you know, going
to be redoing the site -- the master plan, as I said. And what has
happened is, two cul-de-sacs that previously existed, these two
cul-de-sacs, will be extended so we can reconfigure the golf course.
Essentially they will be -- we've had two neighborhood meetings
to address what we're proposing to do. There are a few residents who
are not thrilled with what we're proposing to do because they live
along this roadway right here, and their concern is, how are we going
to impact their view because we are extending the cul-de-sacs so we
can realign the golf course.
In the end they will still have two fairway widths of golf course,
at least 500 feet of a view of a course. So we're confident that we're
not doing anything that will harm their value in their home by doing
this. In fact, we're confident that everything that we're doing, the new
golf course, the improved clubhouse, is actually going to increase their
property value.
They will have a shorter distance of view of the golf course, yes,
but it will not harm the value of their home, nor will it affect their
quality of life.
We've had two meetings, as I've said, with. the neighbors and the
residents, and I will tell you the vast majority are in favor of what
we're doing and how we're giving this community a facelift, and -- it's
an older community, as I think you're all well aware of.
.........It was built before you had real standards for water management
district. We're going through the permitting process to bring the entire
development through the water management district permitting
process.
So we're really -- we're really going to be spending a lot of
money to bring this community up to current codes, or as close to
them as we can get considering it's an existing development.
Page 147
September 21, 2004
So we've had those neighborhood meetings, like I said. The
residents, as a whole, I believe, are in favor of this. There are a couple
of residents who would rather see us do nothing. I don't think they're
terribly concerned about helping their other neighbors. But the
general feeling out there, I believe, is that what we are doing is a good
thing for the community.
We went to the Planning Commission as we're required to do,
and the Planning Commission obviously made -- they made some
changes to our PUD, and I'm going to have to hand out for you the
changes, because not everything got into the version in front of you.
We had agreed to a few things through the Planning Commission
that are not in the document in front of you. What happened
apparently, you know, Fred Reischl was with the county, he was our
planner, he left. It got handed off to Kay Deselem. Kay included in
your packet an older version of the PUD document.
It's substantially the same, but as you'll see from this cover letter,
these three points are not addressed in the PUD document in front of
you, but we did agree to them and we wanted to make sure that you
had before you the current PUD that includes all the terms.
We agreed that the golf course owner would be responsible for
all the lake maintenance and that would not be an association expense
for the homeowners. That's reflected in the document in front of you,
so that's -- the cost-saving expense we agreed to as the developer of
the project, that that would be an expense for the golf course only, not
the residential lot owners.
We also agreed that should the property to our east ever become
developed, that we would work with that individual to allow for
interconnection. That's not in your document in your agenda, but it is
__ needs to be included, and is in the provision that we have in front of
you.
We also agreed to include a neighborhood park on one of the
residential lots, so that's also in the PUD document. These are
Page 148
September 21, 2004
M~. McPHERSON : Yes, ma'am. You have three speakers.
CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay. That's the end of your
presentation. Do we have staff?
MR. YOV ANOVICH: Unless you want to hear from the
individual consultants.
CHAIRMAN FIALA: No. Did staff want to make a
presentation?
MR. BELLOWS: Good mor -- or good afternoon, excuse me.
For the record, Ray Bellows.
I did review the document that Mr. Y ovanovich handed out, and I
attended the Planning Commission meeting where Fred made the
presentation.
The items presented are consistent with the notes I took during
the meeting. It's not significantly different from the PUD document
that YOll have, but it is vital to have it on the record what the correct
document is, and that's the purpose for handing it out today.
As staff, I apologize. We had a turnover, and we were trying to
catch up with some of the work that piled up.
But, for the record, it is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Staff did a compatibility analysis, and there will be no adverse impact
from that standpoint for the proposed change.
Planning Commission recommended approval subject to
conditions, and staff is supportive of that, and I'll be happy to answer
any questions.
MR. MUDD: Commissioner, if you'll look at the PUD
document, this will help just a little bit. Maybe it will be help -- or
might not be, but if you take a look, there's those three things on the
front. For instance, number one item, it's a change to section 4.10, and
that's o~ page 9 of your letter, and it's underlined, the change in 4.10.
It says, however, the entity operating the golf course shall be
responsible for maintaining the lake, and that's per the guidance that
they received from the CCPC.
Page 151
September 21, 2004
he's got to make these improvements with 110 lots, not 171. They're
owned by some others, so he's funding all the improvements with 110
lots.
Commissioner Henning, to get back to your point, yes, we agreed
to landscaping here. The rears of the homes are still going to have the
golf course views. So we think we can accommodate the people that
are going to be buying those lots. They'll still have their golf course
view. But this is a side view, so it should work out nicely for those
homes, and also provide some additional assurances for these homes
over here.
COMMISSIONER HENNING: Commissioners, I think what I
see is being proposed is an overhaul benefit to the community,
removing multi-family and a hotel that would generate a lot of trips
down there, besides fixing some of the storm water issues. And I could
tell you that if you have a view of a Gulfstream home, it's a benefit.
I'm going to make a motion to approve.
CHAIRMAN FIALA: I'll second that.
Thank you.
Any further discussion?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN FIALA: All those in favor, say aye. /
COMMISSIONER HALAS: Aye.
COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Aye.
CHAIRMAN FIALA: Aye.
COMMISSIONER COYLE: Aye.
COMMISSIONER HENNING: Aye.
CHAIRMAN FIALA: Opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN FIALA: So that passes unanimously.
MR. YOV ANOVICH: Thank you.
CHAIRMAN FIALA: I think. you're going to be doing some
great things for everybody that lives in there. It sounds like it's a great
Page 161
September 21, 2004
improvement now to what -- you know, what has been going on, so --
MR. YOV ANOVICH: That's the plan. Thank you.
CHAIRMAN FIALA: -- that's wonderful.
Item #8H
ORDINANCE 2004-61- AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, EXTENDING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF
ORDINANCE 2004-41, WHICH RE-CODIFIED THE COLLIER
COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, TO OCTOBER 18,
2004, DUE TO UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES AND
MR. MUDD: Commissioner, the next item is 8H, and that will
be presented by Mr. Joe Schmitt, and that's an emergency ordinance,
okay, to change --
MR. SCHMITT: Ob, no. That's going to be Patrick.
MR. MUDD: Excuse me.
MR. SCHMITI: Patrick. Patrick's got this one. I was jumping
to the next one. This will be quick.
MR. MUDD: Excuse me, Commissioners. Mr. White from the
county's attorney's office will present. This is an emergency
ordinance to change the UEC effective date and shift it to the 18th of
October, 2004.
And I believe you will have to declare an emergency for this
ordinance and then approve the effective date; am I correct, Mr.
White?
MR. WHITE: Assistant county attorney, Patrick White. The
county manager's correct on both points. Just so you know, there was
no advertising required for this, but we would like to have that
declaration as part of the motion. It is included, however, as part of the
ordinance. So unless there are any questions --
Page 162
Water Management Permit
(8
SOUT.. FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT l.
ENVIRONMEN'l'AL RESOURCE PEJitMIT NO.
DATE ISSUED:
';;TRICT
11-02383-P
13-APR-200S
FORM 10145
_.1lI/ll5
PERMITTEE: NAPLES GOLF CLUB SOUTH LLC
NAPLES SOUTH LLC
NAPLES GOLF DEVELOPMENT LLC
(BOYNE SOUTH AKA. NAPLES GOLF CLUB SOUTH)
See atttached
for address
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SERVING A 338.40 ACRE
RESIDENTIAUGOLF COURSE DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS BOYNE SOUTH, WITH DISCHARGE INTO GOODLAND BAY
VIA rHE BIG MARCO RIVER VIA THE SR 92 DITCH VIA AN EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCH VIA THE MASTER SURFACE
WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. IN ADDITION CONCEPTUAL AUTHORIZA nON FOR 8.60 ACRES, PART OF THE
338.40 ACRE SITE, IS REQUESTED FOR THE MULTI-FAMILY PARCELS AND THE CLUB HOUSE EXPANSION,
PROJECT LOCATION:
PERMIT DURATION:
COLLIER COUNTY,
SECTION 20 TWP 51S RGE 27E
See Special Condition No: 1. See attached Rule 40E-4.321, Florida Administrative Code.
This Permit is issued pursuant to Application No. 040402-25. dated September 28, 2004. Permittee agrees to hold and save the
South Florida Water Management District and its successors harmless from any and all damages, claims or liabilities which may arise
by reason of the construction, operation, maintenance or use of activities authorized by this Permit. This Permit is issued under the
provisions of Chapter 373. Part IV Florida Statutes (F.S.), and the Operating Agreement Concerning Regulation Under Part IV,
Chapter 373 F.S.. between South Florida Water Management District and the Department of Environmental Protection. Issuance
of this Permit constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards where neccessary pursuant to Section 401,
Public Law 92-500, 33 USC Section 1341 ,unless this Permit is issued pursuant to the net improvement provisions of Subsections
373.414(1)(bl, F.S., or as otherwise stated herein.
This Permit may be transferred pursuant to the appropriate provisions of Chapter 373, F.S, and Sections 40E-1.6107(1) and (2), and
40E-4.351(1). (2), and (4), Florida Administrative Code (FAC.). This Permlt may be revoked, suspended, or modified at any tune
pursuant to the apq;opriate provisions of Chapter 373, F.S. and Sections 40E-4.351 (1). (2), and (4), F.A.C.
This Permit shall be subject to the General Conditions set forth In Rule 40E-4.381. F.A.C., unless waived or modified by the
Governing Board. The Application, and the Environmental Resource Permit Staff ReVlew Summary of the Application, inc1udmg
all conditions, and all plans and specifications incorporated by reference, are a part of this Permit. All activities authorized by
this Permit shall be implemented as set forth in the plans, specifications, and performance criteria as set forth and incorporated
in the Environmental Resource Permit Staff Review Summary. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted
activity, the Permittee shall submit a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other
appropriate individual, pursuant to the appropriate provisions of Chapter 373, F.S. and Sections 40E-4.361 and 40E-4.381, F.A.C,
In the event the property IS sold or otherwise conveyed, the Permittee will remain liable for compliance with this Permit until transfer
is approved by the District pursuant to Rule 40E-1.6107, F.A.C.
SPECIAL AND GENERAL CONDITIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
SEE PAGES 2 3 OF 6
SEE PAGES 4 6 OF 6
(18 SPECIAL CONDITIONS).
(19 GENERAL CONDITIONS).
SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
DISTRICT, BY iTS GOVERNING BOARD
On ORIGINAL SIGN~D BY:
By ELIZABETH VEGUILLA
DEPUTY CLERK
PAGE 1 OF 6
EXHIBIT "B"
PERMIT NO: 1l-02383--P
PAGE 2 OF 6
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1- The construction phase of this permit shall expire on April 13, 2010.
2. Operation of the surface water management system shall be the responsibility of BOYNE
SOUTH PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION. Within one year of permit issuance or concurrent
with the engineering certification of construction completion, whichever comes first,
the permittee shall submit a copy of the recorded deed restrictions (or declaration
of condominium, if applicable), a copy of the filed articles of incorporation, and a
copy of the certificate of incorporation for the association.
3. Discharge Facilities:
Existing Pumps
Receiving body : Lake 25
Control elev : 2.5 feet NGVD.
Basin: ~ Basin 4
1-30' W X 1.5' H SHARP CRESTED weir with crest at elev. 2.5' NGVD.
Receiving body Lake 25
control elev : 2.5 feet NGVD.
Basin: Basin 6
1-30' W X 1.5' H SHARP CRESTED weir wi~h crest at elev. 2.5' NGVD,
Receiving body Lake 25
Control elev 2.5 feet NGVD.
4. The permittee shall be responsible for the correction of any erosion, shoaling or
wate~ quality problems that result from the construction or operation of the surface
water management system.
S. Measures shall be taken during construction to insure that sedimentation and/or
turbidity violations do not occur in the receiving water.
6. The District reserves the right to require that additional water quality treatment
methods be incorporated into the drainage system if such measures are shown to be
necessary.
7. Lake side slopes shall be no steeper than 4:1 (horizontal:vertical) to a depth of two
feet below the control elevation. Side slopes shall be nurtured or planted from 2
feet below to 1 foot above control elevation to insure vegetative growth, unless
shown on the plans.
B.' Facilities other than those stated herein shall not be constructed without an
appro~~d modification of this permit.
9. A stable, permanent and accessible elevation reference shall be established on or
within one hundred (100) feet of all permitted discharge structures no later than the
submission of the certification report. The location of the elevation reference must
be noted on or with the certification report.
10. The permittee shall provide routine maintenance of all of the components of the
surface water management system in order to remove all trapped sediments/debris. All
materials shall be properly disposed of as required by law. Failure to properly
maintain the system may result in adverse flooding conditions.
11. This permit is issued based on the applicant's submitted information which reasonably
demonstrates that adverse water resource related impacts will not be caused by the
completed permit activity. Should any adverse impacts caused by the completed
surface water management system occur, the District will require the permittee to
provide appropriate mitigation to the District or other impacted party. The District
will require the permittee to modify the surface water management system, if
necessary, to eliminate the cause of the adverse impacts.
12. Minimum building floor elevation:
BASIN: Basin 2 - 7.00 feet NGVD.
BASIN: Basin 3 - 7.00 feet NGVD.
Golf Course engineer memos to SFWMD
HM
HOLE MONTES
ENGINEERS, PlANNERS, SURVEYORS
950 Encore Way. Naples, Florida 34110 . Phone: 239.254.2000 . Fax: 239.254.2099
April 2, 2004
Mr. Ricardo Valera
SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
2301 McGregor Boulevard
Fort Myers, Florida 33901
RE: NAPLESGOLFCLUBSOUTH
SFWMD PERMIT APPLICATION
HM FILE NO.: 2002133
Dear Ricardo:
Please find enclosed information to request approval of a SFWMD Permit Application (ERP) for
the aforementioned project. The pre-application meeting between you and George Hermanson
on January 27, 2004 reviewed various aspects required for this project and this application
addresses the issues identified during the meeting. The permit application covers alterations to
the existing water management system on Naples Golf Club South (formerly mown as Boyne
South) which was constructed in the mid 1970s before SFWMD permitting was required.
Several of the existing lakes will be partially or completely filled. A number of existing lakes
will also be expanded and new lakes will be excavated to accommodate the proposed golf course
layout. The existing outfall structures will not be altered and will continue to function in the
same manner as originally constructed. The overall proposed water management system will
operate substantially the same as the existing water management system.
The anticipated phasing for this project will most likely begin on the west side of the existing
golf course and finish on the east side. Construction is proposed to begin in the 3m Quarter of
2004 and continue through 2005. Silt fence will be placed around the perimeter of the project
and turbidity barriers will be placed adjacent to lake expansion areas during construction. The
water management system will be owned and operated by the owner, Naples Golf Club South,
LLC. Water and wastewater service will continue to be provided by Collier County Utilities.
We have enclosed the following information for your review:
· Five (5) copies of the ERP (Environmental Resource Permit Application) (Section A, C
& E) and supporting documentation.
· Five (5) copies. ~f ,the Water Management Plans (signed and sealed) (HM Drawing No.
4211-1 throifgfi4~lMdklatrl~taivlilui!a1 map.
N;::m!p,r: . Ff'rt Mvnn- p \I~",rp.
ORIGINAL SUBMITTAfil
APR tJ j 2~ /
I
/
04 0 402 - 25#
W:\2002\2002133\SK\Naples South ERPSUBMIITALCOVERLEITER. oc
-~~~-;'-:'::":.~~
lWr ~f,"",,;..,.- r..
Ricardo Valera
SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRIcr
RE: NAPLES GOLF CLUB SOUTH SFWMD PERMIT APPLICATION
HM FILE NO.: 2002133
Page 2
. Five (5) copies of the Storm Drainage Pipe Calculations (signed and sealed).
· Five (5) copies of the Warranty Deed.
. Five (5) copies of the Letters of Authorization for George Hermanson, P.E. to act as
Agent.
. One (1) fee check number 1078 in the amount of$7,500.
This concludes our ERP submittal. Should you require further information, please feel free to
contact me.
Yours truly,
HOLE MONTES, INC.
~c.M ~.
Scott Kearney, P.E.
Project Engineer
Enclosures
cc: Ashley Bloom w/enclosures
Leonard Gross w/enclosures
W:\2002\2002133\SK\Naples South ERPSUBMITI ALCOVERLETTER.do::
..-il...IL"f\lIUi\i i"'Vtw..L .
HM
HOLE MONTES
ENGINEERS. PlANNERS. SURVEYORS
040402-25#
950 Encore Way' Naples. Florida 34110 . Phone: 239.254.2000 . Fax: 239.254.2099
October 28, 2004
Marie Dessources
Environmental Analyst
Lower West Coast Service Center
South Florida Water Management District
2301 McGregor Blvd.
Ft. Myers, FL 33901
Kevin Dickson, P.E.
Lead Engineer
Lower West Coast Service Center
South Florida Water Management District
2301 McGregor Blvd,
Ft. Myers, FL 33901
Subject: Naples Golf Club South a.k.a. Boyne South
Application No: 040402-25, 2nd Response
Collier County, Sections 20, Township 51S,Range 27E
HM File No. 2002133
Dear Ms. Dessources and Mr. Dickson:
This letter is in response to SFWMD comments letter dated August 30, 2004. Please find
attached three copies of the following along with our responses to each comment:
. Three (3) sets revised HM Drawing 4211, sheets 1 - 16
. Three (3) copies of the Ownership Exhibit (Drawing No. SK04-04) with Deeds and
Letters of Authorization
. Three (3) copies of the By-laws of Boyne South Property Owner's Association and
Declaration and Protective Covenants for Boyne South
. Three (3) copies of the pump curve for the wet season portable pumps
. Three (3) copies of the Specific Purpose Survey and Property Description, HM Drawing
A-997
. Three (3) copies of the Operational BMP's to Minimize Stormwater Pollution
RESPONSES
1. The application indicated that a water use application for irrigation will be provided
under separate cover. In accordance with Sec. 3.2(b), a water use application must be
processed simultaneously with the ERP. Please submit this application in a timely
manner so that the processing of the ERP application will not be delayed. Please contact
Terry Bengtsson of the Lower West Coast Service Center to discuss issues, and if
applicable, submit a water use application.
Response: The Water Use Permit application --1m:- this project was submitted on
September 10, 2004.
W :\2002\2002133\Permits\SFWMD\SFWMD2ndResponseCommentsL TR040830.doc
NaDler. . ;:ort Mver,' . VemCE'
South Florida Water Management District
Application No. 040402-25
October 28, 2004
Page 2 of4
{ADD/REVISED SUBMITTAL
! r OCT 2 8 ~ 1
i~._~~~~~CE CENTER
2. Please provide a plan view depicting the location and placement of the sediment and
erosion control devices that will be utilized during the construction.
Response: See HM Drawing No. 4211, sheet 11 for location of sediment and erosion
control devices.
3. Please provide a cross-section for the structural buffer proposed in the northern portion of
the proposed development. The provided cross-section needs to include details such as
existinglfmal grades, locations of turbidity and erosion controls, stabilization measures
(i.e., sodding, seeding, geo-textile material, riprap, stabilization rock, etc.), buffer details,
etc.).
Response: See HM Drawing No. 4211, sheet 10 for structural buffer cross section
detaiL
4. As previously requested, please provide a summary table of owners for each parcel
included in this application. This information is requested due to the following reasons:
a. Section A of the application identifies Naples Golf Club South LLC as the
property owner.
Response: See revised attached Section A.
b. The Deed of Protective Covenants identifies Boyne USA South, Inc. the
declarant and Boyne South Property Owners Association, Inc. as the responsible
entity.
Response: The entities identified in 7a. represent the subsequent developer to
Boyne USA South Inc. (as part of one purchase). The Boyne South Property
Owners Association is still in existence.
c. The Collier County Appraiser information provided identifies Naples Golf
Development LLC and Naples South LLC as owners of parcels. Please provide
a cross-reference of this data to match the warranty deeds provided. Staff could
not cross-reference this information due to the description on the warranty deeds
not matching the ownership data provided.
Response: Please see the response to item 7(a), above.
/'f r-". ,
l...11., .
'V/"f
I IU/V..
o ~ 0 IlJU/I/iJ..:",
.., 4 0 v'ut:1i
<...<
S#
d. Warranty deeds were provided for Naples South LLC.
Response: Please see the response to item 7(a), above.
W:\2002\2002133\Permits\SFWMD\SFWMD2ndResponseCommentsL TR040830.doc
South Florida Water Management District
Application No. 040402-25 0 4 0 4 0 2 - 2 5 #
October 28, 2004
Page 3 of4
ApOl rr:~""""'"':\~ ~,,!: 1?~!"~l'"""~f
I ""J,..!l!, ,t .-,' i -". ""I
'- . . "',4 ''j :- '.:; ':!:_.. . ~ <
'1
ADD/REVISED SUBMITTAL
r OCT 2 8 2lIJIl J
LWC SERVICE CENTER
5. Please show where the parcels are located on the boundary survey for which property
ownership documentation was provided.
Response: See HM Drawing SK04-04. The hatched parcels represent the lots
identified in the ownership documentation.
6. The additional information submitted indicates that homeowner's association
documents are attached in the submittal however such documents could not be found.
Please provide a draft copy of the homeowner's association documents including the
Deeds, Restrictions and Covenants. Be sure that the documents identify the
maintenance entity, identify the surface water management system, include a legal
description of the association, outline the maintenance entity's responsibilities and
contain the powers and attributes as identified in the Basis of Review, Section 9.2.
The application currently included the articles and by-laws of the homeowner
association. Identify the section in the HOA documents corresponding to the
requirements in the BOR on a copy of the section and return it with the response.
Response: See attached By-laws of Boyne South Properly Owners Association and
Declaration and Protective Covenants for Boyne South. See Declaration and
Protective Covenants Article 3.2 detailing water management areas and Article 5.6
reviews the Associlltions maintenance of lakes and secondary drainage.
7. As previously requested, please provide signed and sealed as-built paving, grading
and drainage plans.
Response: The as-built plans are now certified and are signed and sealed.
8. Your last response indicated that you would like to continue to utilize the two
portable pumps during the wet season. Please indicate, on the plans, the location(s)
where the two portable pumps are located, their discharge capacity and where they
discharge from and to. Please indicate the rainfall depth and intensity that
necessitates the need for the pumps and describe the site flooding that you are trying
to control with them. Are the pumps considered in your flood routings? If not please
revise the routings to include them. Have you considered any other solutions to the
problem other than the pumps?
Response: See HM Drawing No. 4211, Sheet 3 for pump locations and where the
pumps discharge to and from. See attach pump curve specifications and capacity.
We believe the increased lake acreage and improved system piping will alleviate the
pumping from the two portable pumps during the wet season. When the 6L's Farm
east of the property start their large pumps for dewatering, the portable pumps
currently used by the golf course may still be necessary to prevent flooding on site.
The flood routings previously submitted did not include the two portable pumps and
W:\2002\2002133\Permits\SFWMD\SFWMD2ndResponseCommentsL TR040830.doc
South Florida Water Management District
Application No. 040402-25
October 28, 2004
Page40f4
the site was able to flow effectively without the additional pumping. However, we
would like to maintain the option of having the two portable pumps to ensure site
flooding does not occur after the golf course improvements are constructed.
Also, please find attached the operational BMPs as requested by Bill Foley during our meeting
on September 17, 2004. He indicated the BMPs are now items the SFWMD wants to see in the
submittal process.
This concludes our response comments. Should you require additional information or have
further questions, please feel free to contact me.
George H. Hermanson, P .E.
Senior Vice President
GHH/laa
Attachments
cc: Ashley Bloom with attach.
APPLICATION NUMBER
04 0 402
-25#
W :\2002\2002133\Permits\SFWMD\SFWMD2ndResponseCommentsL TR040830.doc
Assessment from HOA Directors to Homeowners
Kramer-Triad
Management Groupl L.L.C,
Ann Arbor · Bingham Farms · Farmington Hills · Troy. Naples, FL
BOYNE SOUTH PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC.
NOTICE OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT MEETING
May 26, 2006
Dear Boyne South Property Owner:
This letter shall serve as notice of a Special Assessment Board meeting June 12th, 2006 at 9:00
a.m. to be held at The Port of the Islands Resort (Egret Room), 25000 Tamiami Trail East, Naples,
FL 34114. The Special Assessment is recommended by the Board of Directors of the Boyne South
Property Owners Association, Inc. The focus of the speciai assessment will be on two major projects
to be done in 2006 that are not part of our Phase II addition:
The first project will be a major landscape renovation project which will be along U.S.
41 Tamiami Trail east of the main entrance to the east property line. The project will
consist of constructing a barrier along with new landscaping materials which will
include over 112 trees including Royal Palms, Magnolia Trees, Laurel Oaks, Black
Olives and various shrubs and plantings. The cost of this project is $113.000.
The second project will entail the replacement of approximately 700 feet of 48 inch
concrete storm drain pipe installation, fabrication of flapper gate valves and repairs
to existing valves. This will take place by Lake 8 and Lake 14. The cost of this pl'oiect
is $448.522. Due to unforeseen modifications because of existing utilities which
prohibited construction as originally planned, new engineering requires additional
work and associated cost increases.
The total cost of the two new projects outlined above is $561.522.
To cover the cost of the (2) major projects, $67.000 will be utilized from the Capital Contribution
Account leaving a balance of $494.522. Based on 288 assessable lots the Developer will be
responsible for 123Iots;'This therefore requ.ires- a special assessrnentam01.!Ilt uf-each lot owner in
the amount of $1.717.00.
Please note that you have the option to pay the special assessment in full or in two installments; the
first installment will be due July 1 et, 2006 and the second due August let, 2006.
Sincerely,
KRAMER-TRIAD MANAGEMENT GROUP, L.L.C.
Agent for Boyne South Property Owners Association
Mike Morrow, CAM, CMCA
Community Association Manager
3050 N. Horseshoe Dr, Suite 275 · Naples · Florida · 34104
239-263-1577 239-530-1338 (Fax)
www.kramertriad.com
BOYNE SOUTH PROPERTY OWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC.
NOTICE OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
Mav 26, 2006
'"
Special Assessment and Amended Budeet
Dear Boyne South Owner,
The Board of Directors of Boyne South Homeowners Association, Inc., in accordance wid
Florida Statutes Chapter 720, will hold a meeting, June 12th. 2006 at 9:00 a.ill. in the Hotel a
The Port of the Islands Resort Hotel (Egret Room), 25000 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 3411~
to consider the Special Assessment to finance replacement of storm drain and landscap~
renovation as well as consider an amended budget to avoid a 2006 Operating Budget shortfall. l-
copy of the proposed amended budget is attached.
~eplacement of storm drain
mdscape renovation
Deposit- Capital Contribution Reserve
Total
Special Assessment Expenses
$ 448,522.00
S 113.000.00
- $67,000.00
$ 494,522.00
Fee per unit
$1 ,717.00
Special Assessment MeetiIU! Aeenda
I. Call to Order
II. Verification of Notice and Quorum
III. Appointment of new Board Member
IV. Budget Amendment
V. Consideration of Special Assessment
A. Replacement of storm drain
B. Landscape renovation
VI. Adjournment, 11 :00 a.ln.
Sincerely,
-~Al\'tER- TRIAD ~lANAGEJ.\tIENT GROUP, L.L.C.
Agent for Boyne South Homeowners Association
Mike Morrow, CAM, CCAM
Community Association Manager
Kramer-Triad Naples
Management Group, L.L.C.
An Assocla Member
June 12,2006
Dear Boyne South Property Owner;
As the Managing Agent for Boyne South Homeowners Association, Inc., we are taking this opportunity to
write you concerning the following: The Board of Directors of Boyne South Homeowners Association, Inc.,
on this date in accordance with Florida Statutes Chapter 720 has approved an Amended Budeet to avoid a
2006 Operating Budget shortfall and a Soecial Assessment to finance replacement of storm drain. There was
a second Special Assessment landscaping item that was postponed until the Board of Directors can further
research the issue.
BUDGET AMENDMENT
As a result of detailed analysis, we have achieved a balanced budget which includes funds to meet
contractual commitments on day-to-day items that have significantly impacted the initial operating budget.
The amended Budget for the fiscal year beginning January 1,2006 will include a maintenance fee of$181.25
quarterly or $725.00 annually per lot owner.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
The focus of the special assessment will be on a major project to be done in 2006 that is not part of the Phase
II addition: The project will entail the replacement of approximately 700 feet of 48 inch concrete storm drain
pipe installation, fabrication of flapper gate valves and repairs to existing valves. The cost of the proiect is
$448.522
To cover the cost of the major project, $67.000 will be utilized from the Capital Contribution Account
leaving a balance of $381.522. Based on 288 assessable lots of which the Developer will be responsible for
123 lots. This therefore requires a special assessment amount of each lot owner in the amount of $1.324.72.
Please, note that you have the option to pay the special assessment in full or in two installments; the first
installment will be due July 1st, 2006 and the second installment due August 1st, 2006.
Sincerely,
KRAMER-TRIAD MANAGEMENT GROUP, L.L.C.
Agent for Boyne outh Homeowners Association, Inc.,
~
ike Morrow, M, CCAM
Community Association Manager
3050 N. Horseshoe Dr. Suite 275 · Naples · Florida · 34104
239-263-1577 239-530-1338 (Fax)
www.kramertriad.com
Colonel Leonard F. Nolan, Jr. USAF (ret)
18030 Bluewater Drive
Naples, FL 34114
July 11,2006
In reply to: June 12,2006 letter
Ref: Block F Lots 44 and 45 Assessment and Quarterly Dues
Ref: Bl9ck F Lot 22 Quarterly Dues
Mr. Michael Morrow
Kramer-Triad Management Group, L.L.C.
Agent for Boyne South Homeowners Association, Inc.
3050 N. Horseshoe Dr.
Suite 275
Naples, Florida 34104
Dear Mr. Morrow,
In response to your letter on the Special Assessment, after review and analysis I have
determined that this is not an appropriate charge to me as a member of the Boyne South
Homeowners Association, Inc., and as such I will not being paying it and request that you
remove this charge from my account.
This determination, in part, is based upon the following:
1) The appropriate authorities have not accepted this project, so that makes this
expense the permittee's responsibility since this is still in the construction phase.
2) The South Florida Water Management District permit number 11-02383-P
Special Conditions #10 which states, in part, "the permittee shall provide routine
maintenance of all the components of the surface water management system in
order to remove all trapped sediments/debris." If the developer has failed to do
this, then they are responsible for what ever steps are required to fix the problem.
3) The operational phase does not become effective until the permittee has complied
with the requirements and that has not occurred.
4) In various documents, correspondences and Water Management Plans, the
developer and/or his agents stated that the existing weirs and outfalls are to
remain in place. It was also stated "The existing outfall structures will not be altered
and will continue to function in the same manner as originally constructed." See Hole
Montes letter of April 2, 2004.
5) It was stated in George Hermanson's letter of October 28,2004, on the question of the
need for pumps, he stated in part, "improved system piping will alleviate the
pumping" .
6) Please note on the above-mentioned SFWMD permit Special Condition #8, which
.states "Facilities other than those stated herein shall not be constructed without an
approved modification of this permit."
7) In the General Conditions of the same permit # 19 it states, "The permittee shall
immediately notify the District in writing of any previously submitted information
that is later discovered to be inaccurate."
8) In my meetings and review with SFWMD they inform me that no notification of
inaccurate information was sent to the District and no modification was requested.
Hence there is no approved modification. Therefore, this work is in violation of the
permit. Payment by myself or any member of the HOA may give reason for the
permitting authority to bring legal proceedings against us for this unauthorized
activity. I will not be party to activities that are in violation with any governmental
authority.
9) It is further my position that the contract that was executed on September 9, 2005 is
not valid and may be in violation of Homeowner Association rules. Amongst other
issues there was no Board approval for neither this expenditure nor the use of
$67,000 of homeowner funds that were taken on December 15,2005, check #1264 to
Henning Construction. Also as per Florida Statutes I could not find any additional
bids on this part of the permitees's work and if this were to be homeowner
association expense, competitive bids are required. As such I request the immediate
repayment of the $67,000 plus interest back into the HOA Capital Improvements
.accounts from the permittee holders.
10) Based on these and other statements I cannot understand why the permittee holder
replaced these structures. In as much as permittee voluntarily chose to replace them it
is the permittees expense, not the homeowners.
11) As I continue to research this issue I reserve the right to put forth additional reasons
why this is not a homeowners responsibility.
On the revised budget, while I agree that some of the items may appear to be necessary,
others seem unsubstantiated; the requirement by Florida Statutes was that the budget be
completed within 60 days of year-end. Since that was not done, then the official budget is
the same as the previous years budget, Therefore, I request that you eliminate this budget
and re-invoice based on the approved initial budget and remove this charge from my
account.
Please feel free to contact me if you need any additional information. I look forward to
working with you and your management company going forward so we can improve,
properly administer and enhance our community.
Respec~ive ly,
Colonel Leonard F. Nolan, Jr. USAF (ret)
18030 Bluewater Drive
Naples, FL 34114
Tot Lot
LEONARD E. ZEDECK, Esq.
13790 N.W. 4" STREET, SUITE 113
SUNRISE, FL 33325
3889890 OR: 4092 PG: 1522
RBCORDED in OPlICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUITY, PL
08/21/2006 at 02:59PM DWIGHT I. BROCI, CLIRI
RlC liE 27.00
DOC-.70 .70
COPIBS 3.00
MISC 1.50
, .. r().
V
This instrument prepared by:
FOLIO NO::
Retn:
ROLl KOlnS IIIC
950 Bleou VAY
MAPLlS PL 34110
(Space Above This Line For Recording Data)
THIS QUIT -CLAIM DEED, Executed this ~ay of July, 2006 . by
NAPLES SOUTH, L.L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company
Grantor., to BOYNE SOUTH PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. , a Florida not for profit
corporation, whose post office address is
WIlNESSETH: That the said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS
AND NOIXX ($10.00) in hand paid by the sai eceipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does
hereby remise, release and quit-claim t~ @T' ver, all the right, title, interest, claim and
demand which the said Grantor has i t. piece or parcel of land. situate, lying
and being in the County of Collier,
TO HAVE AN
thereunto belonging or in an
whatsoevdr of the said Grantor,
Grantee forever.
"SEE LEGAL
II nd singular the appurtenances
I ,interest, lien, equity and claim
e, benefit and behoof of the said
and seal the day and year
Signed, sealed and delivered in presence of:
Le., a Florida
Company
1
-,
,
-
OR: 4092 PG: 1523
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF BROWARD
)
) S5:
)
14-Jj)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~day of July, 2006, by ASHLEY
BLOOM, as Manager of NAPLES SOUTH, L.L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company, on behalf of said
company. He is personally known to me and did take an oath. ~,
S~n 01UVft '-/YL42Ut ,
Print: ~tle'I~. ~
, Notary Public, State of Florida
My Commission Expires:
Commission Number.
PI;, She" .. Adlr
. 00182389
. NcJvembIr 17. 2007
.__.InC.~'
-"
2
ttt OR: 4092 PG: 1524 ttt
tt\lZOO\lO-__o"""jooto b, _ of ~\IlOYAl. PAUl (lIO'IlO[)\200Z'33\SKtTtH\lOlI.OTL-'..... ToO" - .... oz. zooe - ""'pm Plott... by. --
"'D"'D
~R
II
l~i~Ji
! ,~i
~s.1 iJ
..
1111' ~
il~111 ~
11.1 ~
~
! 0
~
"'D"'D
QQ
zz
~ ~ r-
~ ~ fT'I
CD n C')
~ i fT'I
ZS:: Z
~~ c
~i
1"1
Z
~
..
0
c: G")
::u
z Ii..... :>
0 "0
~~~~ -0 -z tl' 2 :I:
r ~ft .....
o ("')
jl~~1 ~ Ul
-4 ... ~ ~
"'D~;u r-
fA 0 -4 t""
. c~ 1""1 trj
-,Z J
<r=i"'D '"tJ ..
C 0
-'i~ 0
.!!I"I ()
C
:"...'"tJ
!:;
-
o
CD
It
o
O>O>-l"iii
-l"t.l0>~
. . . >
OO>O>z
CJ!.O!.l.!.n
1"1
-4
:::0
~
o
-4
rr-le
V.N-~
.....
IIlzZ C
~m~~~
Nd,..,;l"I-l
"!.~"!.g~
~q~~M
~I"II"I
~
en
~
P'I
.....
o
::E:
~
Z
o
~
C')
>
I
0('"
,.,.. .
(I)'
o
:::0
:;;
.....
(5
z
~ a~ ~~I~i ;i ;19~~~i;ill@i O;U;U"'D> ~
I~ni :
~ .,$1 ~
~i ~ ~"1IfA i! ~:S~IEi~~~-~~
ri1~ ~n~~i en . .. cl~ Z >- ~~2:",~ ~
~z i1li1l~ ~ 0 i ~ ~~E~i i
:! ~i;~;!o ~~~E~~
~p ,g %
I. ~; 'e~~11 ~! ;~i~i~i :~~~~ o ~ r-
~~ iR
~>-
---~b-'fi '~ . -- -cl~i~jZ~ ~o t-l~m ~~~~
i-'" ;of! "'D -
i ~~"! o~~~~ f!I~>z
; il~; C~...,"qE ilia ieni~
!;! ~ !.6~~ "0 az ~~ !.6
~ ~~>", jiI ~~>r' Q?'~a!il I!i~i
~:I~ ;u ~;~i~~~~i~~
~a ~ i o~~>-~ ~i~~~~ ~2a~
~ S::~~il
>-clC: il>,~5i!i"1l>!-,~Q !.6 '"
(II ~ ::l ,. 0 ~ ~ 1>>1 0 "'ot~~
i n O' ~ z >
~:i!~~ .~ ~> 00 "'D~ ~
en n~~~~j;l ~~~ ~ ~ ~>'
~2~iI !.6 ~""~glili~~~~lil~ :::I:i!:i!" 0
as! >- e",,,,;u
~i!~r~ilil~~~"'D ;uO
-~Q ~~~~
I>> >' z>z ~ ! ~ -<~~
lil 00 a 8llil 00
~-"_..,...__.,-_...~~,-~-_.~~>---.,._._"---..,--_._'-'--.~-
1264
BOYNE SOUTH PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC.
561-362-4461
18100 ROYAL TREE PARKWAY
NAPLES. Fl 34114-6949
DATE~ \-:5 l ( JS 634~O
$'b1rl~\-Cb'
~..,..- ~-....._. #_.
BaRkofAmerlc:a. ~
~-
loCH lIlT 083100277 .",..
M
FOR
11100 I. ~ b 1.111,:1:0 b 30000 I. ?I: 0051.8 I. 5 boa 50111
~',
~
\
(I)
LU
(!l
<
a.
~
....
o Cl
W I&l
a m
UI -
t!) >
~ =
,
-
Q
Z
'" z
:? Q
., -
~ ...
i ~
~
~
I-
Z
w
::&
~
I:L
~
o
u.
Z ~
o CJ
~ ~
u ""
u:
i=
~
w
U
Q
Z
~
Z
o
~
u =
:J Z
a. ~
a. Q
c( e
::,.::
o
0..
al
...
U
., ~ ~
.9~!Z
.g ~ 0 u
~ou<
~ EEJ3I]
.....
c:o
c:o
l:
u
'il
-
N
o
...
Cl
e
=
Clo
.....
mCl
=.JCI
<;'.Jr;l
~<U'l
, "" -r
-...'"
-;::I
E-Q
rii
Q
Z
...
U
I&l
""ll
Q
cc:
Clo
~
~ ~
i~ e~j
~~ !:11~~
c3'l =<~~
~~~~ 8~ii
'ilCI]<i~lf
6':=: i'=5 8 ~ 1-
~e!:z>o:l:gz
III
.,8
..
e
1;
III
o
u
i
..
a
..
e"
u
..a
u
o
~
~ U 'Il=
u ... ~ "Ci
!'l >. _ .;>-
~""'o~iS
o~ ... u
~~ u~= "
~!~~gg~e
l1oof-o-"'2:i~-'"
.g"Cil~~Z ~~CJ
6~~uffi ~~~
~o!!i~=Ucn'"
~::-aQ~""'-aZ
0- ",cc:::r:::! ",0
CQ:::z",,!-~;Z:U
A'
:=! ..
!.1-8
~ J J l~
J ~ Iii
jillg
O:~:;;!fiil
t3~-"1
.;=;.s
iUH
9A'ts~j
Ii 1 i~ 1
. 8U';!i
;!.J:ai
~ 0-si'0
~ filiI
u ~]j~l
~ Hip
~il~ I
I-
Z
w...
::&;
~a
a.~
~j
00:
~t
o H .
t= s~
c( Ii l!
O~ ·
- .6.r:=l
...Ii">
D. 9 t=:!
D. 'tIO
c( lll-
CI){H
D:: !. ~
~~~
~11
a:: 1tI Vol
I-:;~
Z ~::o
0'- i
01:0
<u
.,.,
~
~
i::
Q
~
ti
~
~
Q
U
-
~
U
~
C/}
Z
0'.
U
I
!
10010"'"
GO ... "'"
00 ...""
t'f\ ...;~
'" CI\
~ ~
i
t-
i
I
1
I
~.; I
.J'1;18
1 !i!'~ J
iJ5~l
lir
ClD~i
"~J~
0: oJ ~ i .
Cl9l:t8ffi
]~~J~
lfijl~
.Ilj~
!lJi~
a . ~ .$ -I
8~ 1.!!I ...
- ;!O
.J.!~~~j
i 11 ~ ~
Iy~...a
'fl..:.cc:>o
~11lG i :S'.g
:a-~i
""~
.sB~Jr:=l
~Cl
....8
r-:r-:
10
...
'8 =
t-~
10...
......
~~
b
..
~ r:i ~- ~
i! ..fIO u.l 08
i ~~_... ~ ~ et ~
~ d.~::;: ~ 1 ~ _ ~ < U g
~~~!i;~ taj ~ ~~i51~~
... o~o SI-u ::::VoI!-o!-o 0
~ oaO ::;:.$ orn.,.,P.iS;::Z::-
o:l J1'-- t:;: e 8 8 I'- 0. - I&l U U = Vol 10
Z ~~j '1;~'1;gaL J~,.)rsi>-~j
8UVoI~VUilltU.llt:t:'1 t3~ Wo,.)< 0 W
g 1 ~ 8 ~ ~ 21 ~ ~I m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i E ~
~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ . ~ !! ! ~ a~ ~! ~ ~
OZUI- ;:..t:i ~ ~::u o:l
...
....:rir.\~ vi
...
.0 ,.: ..; 0\
~
=-
~
t..:'
\C
~
~ ~
-S S
5 t:
~
l I
<::; ..
'a tI -s-
O> 91
~ 'S
:! .. f
.lS " ~ ~~
'1:i ,~
.. il "Ii
~ ~
~
tI g !!lai
:: S ~ 0
.. 11 aU
~ 8 .~
:t ffiJ i
-11 ~
l ~ uf
~i ~
~ ~
~ 0- g
'1:S :I ~18
"
i 5 ~.j
.. i
~
i i ~I u
~ ~ o -s
~ 0 f 51 '1;
j i "8ii
1:1 !!lIe
8 " .s 5'
.S! fit jli
~ .5 I&l
1::1-
1 l:ls=
~u
~~ ;,:., :E gu>
~ o:l I-~ lS.
Vol . .
~
tl
~
...
,
Vol
e
~
~
I~
... ""
J ~
rI:l aL
~ -; j
~ 1~ 0 u
::E A'
I~ :I gJ
1 alil 1 Cl
II ~ ~
u u
s!! S !;j
o IS ~ 0
!-os I- :z
~
Q
u.l
Ii:
~
u.l
U
~
~
I
g
~ .;
.. II
II
~::::i
-II
~.a
~e
~ 0
cO::
Il1b
0-
,. u
~i
l!t5
~ ::I
..C
t~
ig
~ ~
l!i U
..8
~-o
... II:
:z 0
!1
-II:
flit!
l II
~~
i
1:
II
e
=
Cot
o
o
~
EJ
-0.
~ e
:S 0
c u
~ 4G
~I
Ii !
'"; Il:r
Ii !
">t
~.,g
'<_
no II:
a: II
Ii! e
~ a
~.g
~.!!
~!
D 0
z II:
c 0
z-
8-
gi
.. :0-
!!i.s
~i
o 0
Iii;'
.. E
! !
~ CD
D .
=
.
.
..
(00) I :g 0 ~
"" "" ~
~ 0)0) en
oe 10 lIS t--
III 0
C 'r"
j "C
Gi fjlt fjlt fjlt .. .. ..
o:::t:
10 o!) I"-C"') 8 ~ cot ~
CI
~ 0<0 ro
Cjl.... g 10 0
.. 10.11( 2l~ 1"-1"- ~ fIi g 0>>
N ~j: 'r" 'r" (0 = ..
N cg N CO)
.. ..:;) ..!!!E
.....0 ~8 ~ fjlt ~ fjlt .. tit
Iii ... '#. '#. '#. '#. ';It. "I-
~ m ; ~ ~ 0 0>> 0>> 0>>
0 .. .. ....
e .., e
E
'rft 8
'r" to . ! 10 ~
'. <0 I
"" ?"-
m oi ~ ..; i!
10 10
/D
~ iii
"C
I- g fjlt - - - .,. M-
e ,... r- ! ! !
w <0 ClO
0 "" r-
I oi :g f3i ..; ;!
.- 10
C "C
e 0
. ... i
.... :::J M .... tit- .,. ..
0 l1..
lII: I . .
z c
0 0
~ =
... 3
0 !'2
.a.: ;:: Q.
l1.. l'II tit- .. ..
IL
.II( ClO 0 0 IlO IlO IG
~ U') 8 .. 10 IlO
co .. "':. CIIt
"C .~ "" ~ ~ ,,; 1ft CO)
/D N 10 N I
CII CO)
~ "C
:::J
IX: m .... ~ M tit- M- ..
. . . I . . .
.~ Iii
c
". III -e
oJ:
0 0 .... M - - .. tit- ..
co 0 8 IlO ~ IG
~ :g .. :I
..
ii 11 .... <<i (b fA ~ c.)
c: N 1:;; X I
a "C
'c :::J
0 m M - - .,. .. ..
Ig B l 11
=ID ~
CII-
II) 'x l'II i
.... /DC)
.... a CII pjg ~
u- c
.... I&. :8 jU:
-" .. l~
IL.:!: ::J :e; "i
0
::>>m . c 0::)(
OJ . 0
0 a/Jo
0::0 .... I CD ~ CDm
CJ 0 ~ l;J:
1ft S ....
'I ~ II: c il.g
I. J 0 1 CD
... Q) C) ... <.!) 0::1-
18 II. - s & II.
Ii E Ii :g
ell . 'r" 00
I!! CD z Go 0 CD 0 0)(1)
Q 1 CI e 0 C"') C"') ..
.c .... 'r" NN GO
CD 0 IlO ! ....
z ., a:: ..
. ,
en
~
<
IL
o
~
~ el
W liil
~ ~
~ ~
IL llll
I
....
o
z
t:; z
" 53
~ ~
i ~
g
Cl
~
t-
Z
w
:E
~
0.
B:
o
u.
Z ~
o f.J
!i ~
o l:\o<
u:
i=
B:
W
o
o
z
<
z
o
!i
~ ~
...J z
0. ~
0. 0
< e
:::oil
o
C..
t:C
ti
., ~ :a
3!;l~
.g~OOU<
.& f.J
~ EEEIIJ
....
<:>
<:>
~
Q
V
~
-
N
....
rI.lO
=...:l~
~...:l
11) < v
t1""~
_~Cl\
....:;l
1-0
o
P-
el
53
llll
liil
l:\o<
U:i
o
z
~
u
~
o
QI\
l:\o<
~ ~
~ i
o ~ m
it ~!g
UXV f.J'0
=~ ~!j!!
~-; = ,...
>. ...J f.J ....,
i~~QI\8~1i
Q..!!<~;o. rI
l.~ft;:S"'~c.
~~z>~;:c:Z
CI
o
-:::
..
oj 11II
.s ~
oj CI
o ~
~ e
~ u'll: v
~~ ..~~ II
~CII..QI\P-o- c.:l
o~ O:;llXl
~ i ~ ~ Iii .-
8,P-o <o=' llll
e~~"o.z~~
~, ..... _ l-< 7: U -
_.......,.Zt=lf!.l-<
iiil'iJ....oi!Eo..,u
6~~f.J~e-~~
~~..;:I!::I:8ul'~
~Q~o~....-az
0-101" ......0
l:tI~Zroo. ~zu
$
:"S2 d
l!.l=
fJJli
j ~ !I .~
~liij
IcfBI~
o:;~-.i
8 'iil11o-
d~il
ill'e~
.;:iQuB
s$oal
11if.j
Vl>8i.
~8.;jl
~ 81-5'J6'
~ ~~'lia';
;a aoSi-tla
~ g~ ~.g
u u] .s'S
ca 11 .. 'g
~ca.a~2
~ ~-:lJJa:J
u ~ i t~ I
~
c
.,.,
g i
~ gg
C N
6 06
.!! iI 0
I ~ ~
en 5 ...,
i 0 2!
~~!
~,
\0". oJ
~
B
1!I ..,
-8.sji
';osa8
lj~j
j~l:llld
ES a
~I e
!!j~
o..~i
g oS6 Ii! ci
]~i~~
:rt=l~
!ill~
-<g ~
"'.J~OI<
Sci~~~
.stili
1 i"~ .s [
l.s~os ~
ClD"l;>-
~ ~ .~ 'S
~ 'g.'~ 11!l
osl;li'.l"'g
.!!!8<';~
....
Z
wti
:lEa
~~
0.';
D:l
0=
~1
i=sl
<~
(,).2
::; .8 .!1
0. ~ ~
D. 'tI 0
< :a-
en.1
~ R~
o ..~
.... .a '<
U ~ If
~ !~
t- g j
z:a 1
O J!B
15...
U~8
i
g ~
>. N ~
':l -it0 ~ 2l!l
~ _... Q .....~ 0
Ii Q 13 -< . ~
'-' !~ a J ) ~ -- ~ ~ g
,.. +.., <....J
~ ~~~~ 'Is J: ~~i~ 8~ ~
ti ~ c dll 0 - "'l- II 0 ~ r: ""0 l:l
-< 0 0 0 0 It t.:l ::g.s os ~ on iliil Iii ~ ::C ....
~j"'~J 8 g G-l - ~ yu.l& m 0,0
~ Iii ... 0 ~ 'Q' i I.a u 0,0 ~!I
::::> O+ogllll ",..Jm u..-l
~um~ Uic#!I&o~:X: '0 rJg~< 0 6
~ J~~ 8 '-' ~ 211 21; J ~ ; ~'-' ~!11o ~~ ::;
~ ~~~~ 8 81 i ~.111o .;
~ Z f-o ~ ~ '-' ""I- I- f-o d. ~ e
o~8g iii! 1Ii.d g~:: t:Q
'00'00.
;: =~
.., .....
~ ~t;
~ lit
I
1
.!?;>
.~
=s'"
ug
i~
UN
i
i t
~ -g i.I'~
001-1
u:; :l5 .
..]f
';]iu
.s ::I o.!?;>
mmZ~
;
,..
lit
'-;N~" ~
.0
;,,~
....,..
'00
...0 ,...: 00 0\
~ i
IS ~
...
i ~
<;::; 5
1i CD
1i 'S
'::! 'S
:s l
'\1 ,@
:!! ~
~ a
i .9
<:) 11
= ! i
g 'S ii
.. ~ e
~ 'l:; ~
." S ~
~ t
~ l;j
S IS
~ ~
- g
i a
<:) J::
l; t3
~ oS
J:: J::
g <:I
ij 1..
- r::tJ
9' -8 u.l
] ~~
~ ~~
~ -.:<
i::i
~
iE
~
u
~
~
I g :g
c::>"'\
~~
~~
...
~
E:
~
I
m
.s
s~
os i~
d .!!;
....-
it u
.lQ 11 i
Q. 0
~-IQ ~
- oS
~ b
u i
.......
8~ ~
~l~
.88,15
... I" U
.. ~
1-.s
ifll 'S
ili
i1"~
i"i
ul :a
'" ::I
>. :aii'
= 1-'8 a.
lit
"9 ~
i
..
<J
o
~ iii
... CIII
!J: =
~~
~..J
. CIII
3i,c
~E
~,g
ll!~
~~
! c
z.
on,c
~-
~~
~-l:
~ i
~ g
~ g
",g
$-
1= 0
'" c
3:8
z ..
i~
~ .
",U
j: .
~
-
c
.
e
::s
~
o
Q
~
"
s:.s
....!!!
- ICl.
~ e
:$ 0
c ~
Z ..
~ :if
lili
Ii ·
,,:,a.
!z l!!
iJ'
c_
~ i
II E
z ::s
2 g
~"
~i
~ ~o
o i! c
.. cO
j ~I
u g..
$ ~~
!3 '.1!
o l!l.a
; S Q
a ~ f
Iii s!
Z :S..
c::J
r
. .
..
.,
co
o
2
-
...
~
....
!~
'1u.
...1-
....:;)
"'0
.
m
o
..,
~
Q
Q
w
I
...
'*
z
o
~
...;
Q.
c(
~
u;& <<l
~-d ~
81~ ~I
m I- ~ J ·
tft ~ :; ! ~
~iJ~~ Qi ~11~
,o~ ~-a:.
,u. iii:o.
IlW i i ~.. = i
:I: . oicoJ!l
I- Z ...,"'....z
~~
\110
c::.....
]i:2
Gl Gl
D:::C
o
-lD
~~
c:-;;;
..!!!E
&i8
Gl
'is
liS.
E
al!8
Gl
-16
.!l"O
~.e
~'8
::Ji
00..
coO) I co
t--"'" co
0)0) en
to iii
........tIt .
.....t")g
oco
10 0
~~ct
N
tit........
"#.tJ!.al!
CONO
C")N
............
com
......"'"
aim
It)
............
..... ....
com
t--"'"
aiai
It)
.... ....
c:
o
~
.gl'a
0.111
11
j-g
0::01
COOO
co 10 0
NCOO
"':-CO'll'
"'....<<0
'"
C>
Ii;
.
~
.,.
;1.
G)
....
co
~
=
.
!
oJ
co
.
.
GO
...
....
.;
ID
M
.,.
I :t
I~
.,. .,.
N
r;
~
i
;;
...
M
tIt_....
. t I . I
.,.
'f1.
..
...
.,.
~
...
to
en
CD
~
!
;i
.
.,.
CI)
G)
GO
~
~
;!
.,.
.,.
.
.,.
CD
~
=
co
lD
~
CO)
en
CO)
.
VI-
216
.'! 'E
00 tit.....,...... .,. ·
-aim
dLg,
I~ "0
....::J
om
COOO
~~~
~~~
N
tIt__
g
:;:;Gl
f/J-\1I
'j c>
~ ~.~
0111-
=-=LL
'6 1i$"J
c:: 0::: )(
o~ 0
o m
-Gl
ftI>:c
! ~l~
Gl GlI.>
(!)D::I-
c;8~
0t")C")
.....NN
.
...
...
.
co
M
.,.
..
Z
u
1
I-
::
,..
,,;
N
i
~
M
.
:
u.
.
I
I-
co
o
:;
...
~
'i
i
,
"~ ~ /1~AIJ/L .
v V 0 ('r~-'-./ ~~ .
I~~.d
G
~:;L~~~
ru- ---
il
I
i
i
"J)~r~
w~ .' tk-- a--uJ ~ ~f
n u
t
:1
I
"
!I
R~ ~rJu~'
~d ~~
~ (b~, !J vet +kr
r
~~~~
~~~
~I/~
f
i
i
~~~~-
.~<
(uaX4 ~)Jft r GJ ~~
~ ~ j()/~
r
'I
I
"
~~
r
(j)'
~6 r
t/lI\v
~~
~
,
~
.....
"
.........
~
"I
~
~:
J'
1
~
C'
ce
.........
i\:
~
~~
1
c
'\
~~
~
~
,~
REQUEST APPROVAL FOR
LCD AMENDMENT