DSAC Agenda 09/02/2020
Development Services Advisory
Committee
Meeting
Wednesday, September 2, 2020
3:00 pm
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr.
Naples, FL 34104
Growth Management Department
Conference Rooms 609/610
If you have any questions or wish to meet with
staff, please contact
Trish Mill at 252-8214
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
For more information please contact Trish Mill at (239) 252-8214 or Patricia.Mill@colliercountyfl.gov
Development Services Advisory Committee
Wednesday, September 2, 2020
3:00 pm
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104
Growth Management Building, Conference Room 610
NOTICE:
AS PART OF AN ONGOING INITIATIVE TO PROMOTE SOCIAL DISTANCING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE
PUBLIC WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENTS REMOTELY, AS WELL AS IN PERSON,
DURING THIS PROCEEDING. INDIVIDUALS WHO WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY, SHOULD REGISTER ANY
TIME AFTER THE AGENDA IS POSTED ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE WHICH IS 6 DAYS BEFORE THE MEETING THROUGH
THE LINK PROVIDED, LISTING THE TOPIC THEY WISH TO ADDRESS. INDIVIDUALS WHO REGISTER WILL RECEIVE AN
EMAIL IN ADVANCE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING DETAILING HOW THEY CAN PARTICIPATE REMOTELY IN THIS MEETING.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING, PLEASE CALL TRISH MILL AT (239) 252-8214 OR REGISTER
AT:
http://bit.ly/September22020DSACSpeakerRegistration
THIS LINK CAN ALSO BE USED FOR THOSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO VIEW THE MEETING BUT NOT SPEAK. CHOOSE
THE FIRST OPTION “I DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK- VIEWING ONLY” AS YOUR AGENDA ITEM.
Persons wishing to speak on any Agenda item will receive up to three (3) minutes unless the Chairman adjusts the
time. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and speak into a microphone. State your name and affiliation
before commenting. During the discussion, Committee Members may direct questions to the speaker.
Please silence cell phones and digital devices. There may not be a break in this meeting. Please mute your audio if
you have not been recognized by the Chairman to speak or to conduct any personal business. All parties
participating in the public meeting are to observe Roberts Rules of Order and wait to be recognized by the Chairman.
Please speak one at a time and into the microphone so the Hearing Reporter can record all statements being made.
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
For more information please contact Trish Mill at (239) 252-8214 or Patricia.Mill@colliercountyfl.gov
Agenda:
1. Call to order - Chairman
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of Minutes:
a. DSAC Meeting – August 5, 2020
b. DSAC-LDR Subcommittee Meeting – January 7, 2020
c. DSAC-LDR Subcommittee Meeting – February 19, 2020
d. DSAC-LDR Subcommittee Meeting – June 18, 2020
e. DSAC-LDR Subcommittee Meeting – July 28, 2020
4. Public Speakers
5. Staff Announcements/Updates
a. Code Enforcement Division update – [Mike Ossorio]
b. Public Utilities Department update – [Eric Fey or designee]
c. Growth Management Department Transportation Engineering Division & Planning Division
updates – [Jay Ahmad or designee]
d. Collier County Fire Review update – [Shar Beddow or Shawn Hanson]
e. North Collier Fire Review update – [Capt. Sean Lintz or Daniel Zunzunegui]
f. Operations & Regulatory Mgmt. Division update – [Ken Kovensky]
g. Development Review Division update – [Matt McLean]
6. New Business
a. Paperless Permit Process
7. Old Business
8. Committee Member Comments
9. Adjourn
FUTURE MEETING DATES:
October 7, 2020 – 3:00 pm
November 4, 2020 – 3:00 pm
December 2, 2020 – 3:00 pm
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
Development Services Advisory Committee
Attendance Roster - Date: September 2. 2020
DSAC Members
**Must have (8) members for a quorum**
Staff Members
James French
Deputy Department Head, GMD
MichaelOssorio
Director, Code Enforcement
Tom Chmelik or designee
Public Utilities
Ken Kovensky
″″
物 θ″
H#mion Engineeringand/orTransportationplanning &ls( -t, in -frron - .,1
Director, Operations & Regulatory Management KuKu/er,&Zq
Matt Mclean
Director, Development Review
Patricia Mill, Operations Analyst,
笏 紹%James Boughton:
Remote, viaZoom
Norman Gentry:
Remote, viaZoom
CIay Brooker:
Remote, viaZoom
Mark Mclean:
Remote, via Zoom
Jeffrey Curl:
Remote, viaZoom
Chris Mitchell:
Remote, viaZoom
Laura Spurgeon DeJohn:
Remote, viaZoom
Robert Mulhere:
Excused
David Dunnavant:
Remote, viaZoom
Jeremy Sterk:
Remote, viaZoom
John English:
Remote, via Zoom
Mario Valle:
Remote, viaZoom
Marco Espinar:
Remote, via Zoom
Willialn Varian:-Blair Foley:
Excused
Staff Liaison, Operations & Regulatory Management ?a*a*?/ti// ADAre /fd.f
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
PLEASE PRINT
NAME REPRESENTING PHONE NO.
心にR良 歿しい。
“
ら Lht十 硬角 フ%召 ∠
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
Topic Webinar ID Actual Start Time
Actual Duration
(minutes)# Registered # Cancelled Unique Viewers Total Users
Max
Concurrent
Views
Development Services
Advisory Committee 996 6275 6747 9/2/2020 14:17 108 1 0 1 31 1
Host Details
Attended
User Name (Original
Name)Email Join Time Leave Time
Time in Session
(minutes)
Country/Region
Name
Yes Kevin Summers kevin.summers@colliercountyfl.gov 9/2/2020 14:17 9/2/2020 16:05 108
United States of
America
Panelist Details
Attended
User Name (Original
Name)Email Join Time Leave Time
Time in Session
(minutes)
Country/Region
Name
Yes Jeremy Sterk jeremys@eteflorida.com 9/2/2020 14:57 9/2/2020 16:05 68
United States of
America
Yes Chris Mitchell cmitchell@jreeng.com 9/2/2020 14:49 9/2/2020 16:04 76
United States of
America
Yes Richard Henderlong Richard.Henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov 9/2/2020 15:02 9/2/2020 16:04 63
United States of
America
Yes Clay Brooker ccbrooker@napleslaw.com 9/2/2020 14:49 9/2/2020 16:04 76
United States of
America
Yes David Dunnavant Ddunnavant@barroncollier.com 9/2/2020 15:00 9/2/2020 16:04 64
United States of
America
Yes Jeffrey Dunham Jeffrey.Dunham@colliercountyfl.gov 9/2/2020 15:01 9/2/2020 16:05 64
United States of
America
Yes Laura Spurgeon DeJohn ldejohn@johnsoneng.com 9/2/2020 15:01 9/2/2020 16:05 64
United States of
America
Yes Radoslava Edreva Radoslava.Edreva@colliercountyfl.gov 9/2/2020 15:27 9/2/2020 16:05 38
United States of
America
Yes Mark McLean mmclean@mhkap.com 9/2/2020 14:57 9/2/2020 16:05 68
United States of
America
Yes Jeffrey Curl jcurl@emergedesign.biz 9/2/2020 14:52 9/2/2020 16:04 73
United States of
America
Yes James Boughton jboughton@REVnaples.com 9/2/2020 14:57 9/2/2020 16:04 68
United States of
America
Yes Jason Regula jason.regula@colliercountyfl.gov 9/2/2020 14:18 9/2/2020 15:05 48
United States of
America
Yes Mario Valle mvalle@pbscontractors.com 9/2/2020 14:56 9/2/2020 16:04 69
United States of
America
Yes Eric Fey Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov 9/2/2020 14:59 9/2/2020 16:05 66
United States of
America
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -
Yes Danny Condomina Danny.Condomina@colliercountyfl.gov 9/2/2020 14:51 9/2/2020 16:04 74
United States of
America
Yes James French James.French@colliercountyfl.gov 9/2/2020 15:11 9/2/2020 16:04 54
United States of
America
Yes Dave Durrell david.durrell@comcast.net 9/2/2020 14:39 9/2/2020 16:05 86
United States of
America
Yes Norman Gentry gentrynormbcn@gmail.com 9/2/2020 14:50 9/2/2020 16:05 75
United States of
America
Yes Daniel Zunzunegui Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov 9/2/2020 14:54 9/2/2020 16:02 68
United States of
America
Yes Jeremy Frantz jeremy.frantz@colliercountyfl.gov 9/2/2020 15:05 9/2/2020 16:05 60
United States of
America
Yes Marco Espinar marcoe@prodigy.net 9/2/2020 14:59 9/2/2020 16:05 66
United States of
America
Yes Wes Meyer Wes.Meyer@colliercountyfl.gov 9/2/2020 14:53 9/2/2020 15:04 11
United States of
America
Yes Wes Meyer Wes.Meyer@colliercountyfl.gov 9/2/2020 15:06 9/2/2020 16:04 59
United States of
America
Yes Shar Beddow sbeddow@gnfire.org 9/2/2020 15:02 9/2/2020 16:04 63
United States of
America
Yes Patricia Mill Patricia.Mill@colliercountyfl.gov 9/2/2020 14:19 9/2/2020 16:05 106
United States of
America
Yes Robert Mulhere BobMulhere@HMEng.com 9/2/2020 15:01 9/2/2020 16:04 64
United States of
America
Yes Sean Lintz slintz@northcollierfire.com 9/2/2020 15:11 9/2/2020 15:12 2
United States of
America
Yes John English jenglish@barroncollier.com 9/2/2020 15:01 9/2/2020 16:04 64
United States of
America
Attendee Details
Attended
User Name (Original
Name)First Name Last Name Email Address Phone Registration Time
Approval
Status
Yes Amelia Vasquez -CBIA Amelia Vasquez -CBIA amelia@cbia.net 9/1/2020 16:39 approved
Yes Amelia Vasquez -CBIA Amelia Vasquez -CBIA amelia@cbia.net
Other Attended
User Name Join Time Leave Time
Time in Session
(minutes)
Country/Region
Name
12395954929 9/2/2020 14:58 9/2/2020 16:04 67
United States of
America
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -
´
〆
Ъ "も/′
″
Chris Mitche∥,PE
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
August 5,2020
MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COLINTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
Naples, Florida, August 5,2020
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Development Services Advisory
Committee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on
this date at 3:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier County Growth Management Department
Building, Conference Room #6091610, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, with the following
members present:
Chairman: William J. Varian
Vice Chairman: Blair Foley
David Dunnavant
James E. Boughton
Clay Brooker (Excused)
Chris Mitchell
Robert Mulhere (Excused)
Mario Valle
Norman Gentry
Marco Espinar
Laura Spurgeon DeJohn
Jeremy Sterk
Jeff Curl
John English
Mark Mclean
ALSO PRESENT: Jamie French, Deputy Department Head
Diane Lynch, Operations Analyst, Staff Liaison
Trish Mill, Operations Analyst, StaffLiaison
Lorraine LanA, Transportation Planning
Eric Fey, Sr. Project Manager, Public Utilities
Jeremy Frantz, LDC Manager
Mike Ossorio, Director, Code Enforcement Division
Matt Mclean, Director, Development Review
Rich Long, Director, Plans Review and Inspections
Ken Kovensky, Director, Operations and Regulatory Management
Eric Johnson, Principal Planner
Richard Henderlong, Principal Planner
Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting moy request a copy of the audio recording
from the Collier County Growth Manogement Department.
The meeting was conducted via Zoom
I. Call to Order - Chairman
Chairman Varian called the meeting to order at 3:00pm
Page I of7
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
August 5, 2020
II. Approval of Agenda
Mr. Foley moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr, Mitchell. Caruied unanimously 13 - 0.
III. Approval of Minutes from March 4,2020 Meeting
Mr. English moved to approve the minutes of the March 4, 2020 meeting as presented. Second by
Mr. Dunnavant. Carried unanimously 13 - 0.
IV. Public Speakers
None
V. StaffAnnouncementsrupdates
A. Code Enforcement Division update - [Mike Ossorio]
Mr. Ossorio provided the report "Code Enforcement Division Monthly Report June 22, July2t,
2020 Highlights" for information purposes. He noted:o Business is ongoing with Staff involved in more field work and public education during the
pandemic
o Lien search volumes which sagged in March and April has retumed to previous levels.r An initiative is underway to deal with signs in the right ofway such as snipe and real estate.
signs.
o The Division is tasked with enforcing County's requirements for wearing face coverings
including identifl,ing noncomplying businesses and issuing Citations when necessary.
B. Public Utilities Division update - [Tom Chmelik or designee]
Mr. Fey noted:
. Issuance olLefters of Availability and FDEP permits are lagging behind due to Stalfing
levels however Deviations requests are being processed in a timely manner.
o Work continues on the policy changes for Utility Conveyance with a review ofthe standards
by the County Attomey's Office. The item is anticipated to be forwarded to the Utilities
Subcommittee for review in the near future.
o Vehicular damage to fire hydrant has occurred in neighborhoods due to the devices being
improperly installed (on the wrong side of the water main towards the street).
o Another issue is water main breaks due to the lines being installed directly on stone and not
on the sand bedding as required.
C. Growth Management Department/Transportation Engineering and/or Planning - [Jay Ahmad
or designeel
Ms. Lantz reported:. The planning of some projects is on hold given they are at the public meetings stage.. The East of95l Bridge Reevaluation Study continues with the l0 bridges previously
identified for work still needed due to the need for connectivity, evacuation routes, etc.o The Immokalee Road Corridor Study continues with an altemate public involvement plan to
allow lor Zoom presentat ions.o The Golden Gate Parkway Corridor Complete Streets Study is underway however is slowed
down as it is in the public involvement stage.
Page 2 of 7
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
August 5, 2020
D. County Fire Review update - [Shar Beddow and/or Shawn Hansonl
Ms. Hanson reported turnaround times are as follows: Building Plan review 418 at 2 days; Site Plan
reviews 52 at 1 day; Inspections at I - 2 days. The District is utilizing remote video inspections and
workstations to address issues with the pandemic.
E. North Naples Fire Review update - [Capt. Sean Lintz or Daniel Zunzunegui]
Mr. Zunzunegui reported:
. July yielded 645 Building Plan reviews and 42 Site Plan reviews with Inspection timing at 1
duy.
o The District is testing altemative inspections platforms to help provide service during the
pandemic.
o Staffpolicies are also being amended to ensure employees and the ones they serve remain
safe.
o The District is reviewing Impact Fees with a study to be completed within a couple of weeks.
F. Operations & Regulatory Mgmt. Division update [Ken Kovensky]
Mr. Kovensky submitted the "Collier County July 2020 Monthly Stotistics" which outlined the
building plan and land development review activities. The following was noted during his report:. Business remains steady with an increase seen in electronic submittals due to the pandemic.o The credit card platform for Cityview was activated at the end ofApril.. Permit review times are 2 days behind for electronic submittals and there are no backlogs
associated u ith the paper permit process.
o Staffing challenges continue to be addressed to due ill employees or those taking vacations.
Mr. Long reported:
r The Health Department has diverted resources from plan review to address the pandemic
which is affecting permitting timing.
r The Department is nearly fully staffed with inspections at a l-day tumaround.r Inspections are averaging 22 per day per employee which is helping it improve service given
the volume was much higher at one time.
o Video and recorded inspections are available with the information on the process available
online, however many contractors are not opting for the service at this point.
G. Development Review Division update [Matt Mcl-ean]
Matt Mclean reported
r Pre application and construction meeting as well as other consultations are being held
virtually which is convenient for those involved.o Sewer line installation review videos are now able to be uploaded for Staffthrough the
County's "Box" platform and do not have to be delivered in person.. Due to the recent issues with damage to fire hydrants and sub-standard installation of water
lines, Engineers ofRecord should be aware the County is relying on them to ensure
installations ofthe infrastructure is in accordance with the approved plans. Ifthey have any
Page 3 of7
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
August 5,2020
:H::[:]Jfy
should contact Staffto ensure problems are not encountered post
o The Department is looking for an outside source to assist in providing inspections.
VI. New Business
A. LDC Amendments (6) - [Richard Henderlong, Principal Planner andEric Johnson, Principal
Planner]
|nnr.@resentedtheproposedAmendmentslistedinItemsi-iv.
Mark Mclean, Land Development Review Subcommittee Member reported the proposed
amendments were reviewed during a series of meetings and the Subcommittee recommended they be
adopted.
i. PL20190002647 SRA Designation -StaffReview Timeframes
LDC SECTIONS TO BE AMENDED: 4.08.07 SRA Designation
The amendment modifies the timeframes and procedural review requirements for processing
an application for approval of a development permit or development order for Stewardship
Receiving Areas (SRA) Designations.
ii. PL20200000268 Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Early Entry Bonus Credits
LDC SECTION TO BE AMENDED: 2.03.07 Overlay Zoning Districts
The amendment shall extend the effective time period for the Transfer of Development Rights
(TDR) early entry bonus credits from sending lands in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District.
iii. PL20190002818 RMF-6 Density Clarification
LDC SECTION TO BE AMENDED: 1.08.00 Definitions
9.03.03 Types of Nonconformities
The amendment clarifies the calculation of density for single-family, two family or duplex
dwelling units and multi-family units, on legal nonconforming lots of record in the RMF-6
District. It further clarifies the definition for non-conforming lots of record and lot of record.
iv. PL20190002819 Special Events in Rights-of-Way
LDC SECTIONS TO BE AMENDED: 5.04.05 Temporary Events
5.04.06 Temporary Signs
10.03.06 Public Notice and Required Hearings for
Land Use Petitions
The amendment establishes submittal requirements, criteria for review, and an approval process
for temporary special events that take place in or use County owned or maintained rights-of-way.
It further allows for the temporary placement of signage within rights-of-way.
Mr. Mclean moved to recommend the Boord of County Commissioners adopt the previous
four proposed amendments as presented by Staff. Second by Mn Fotey. Carried unonimously
13-0.
v. PL20200000359 Self-Storage in C-4 ZoningDistrict
LDC SECTIONS TO BE AMENDED: 2.03.03 Commercial Zoning Districts
Page 4 of 7
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
August 5, 2020
5.05.08 Architectural and Site Design Standards
The Land Development Code Amendment (LDCA) proposes to allow enclosed, indoor, air-
conditioned self-storage use as a Permitted Use when combined in the same building with other
uses that are permitted in the C-4 Commercial Zoning District.
Mr. Mclean reported he was abstaining from the ilem due to a contlict of interest and hss
Jiled Form 8.b as required by the Counly.
Mr, Johnson presented the proposed amendment noting the Land Development Review
Subcommittee reviewed the proposed amendment and recommended it be adopted.
Mr. Foley moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners tdopt the proposed
amendment as presented by Staff. Second by Mr. Curl. Carried unanimously Mr. Mclean
abstained.
PL20190001927 Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District
LDC Sections to be Amended: 1.08.01 Abbreviations DSAC-LDR 12-17-2019
2.03.07 Overlal Zoning Districts
2.05.01 Density Standards and Housing Types
4.02.26 Golden Gate Parkway Activity Center Overlay
(GGPACO) Building, Development, and Site Design Standards
4.02.37 Design Standards for Development in the Golden Gate
Downtown Center Commercial Overlay District (GGDCCO)
5.05.01 Businesses Serving Alcoholic Beverages
5.06.02 Development Standards for Signs within Residential
Districts
10.03.06 Public Notice and Required Hearings for Land Use
The proposed amendment establishes the Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District (GGPOD),
which serves to implement several policies of the recently adopted Golden Gate Area Master
Plan. The GGPOD will be comprised of two new subdistricts: the Activity Center subdistrict
(GGPOD-AC) and the Downtown
subdistrict (GGPOD-DT). The GGPOD shall supersede the current provisions ofthe Golden
Gate Downtown Center Overlay District and the Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office
Commercial Overlay.
Mr. Johnson presented the proposed Amendment and provided the PowerPoint "Golden Gate
Parkway Overlay District (GGPOD) - DSAC August 5, 2020" noting. During the amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, the Vision Statement for
Golden Gate City was developed: "Golden Gate City is a safe, diverse, family-oriented
community that ofers easy access to education, parks, shopping and services within a
vibront, walkoble community. "
o In order to implement the plan and vision, the Board of County Commissioners directed
Staffto prepare amendments to the Land Development Code.o The proposed amendments incorporate Overlay Districts which promotes urban design
standards and incentives to encourage development and redevelopment in the area.
Page 5 of 7
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
August 5,2020
The proposed overlays replace existing overlays (GGPPOCO & GGDCCO) with new
overlays, having two different subdistricts and expands the list of allowable uses,
including new Economic Development uses.
The overlays work in concert with one of the County's three Innovation Zones (i.e.,
Golden Gate City Economic Development Zone) a Federal Opportunity Zone, which is in
effect through 2028.
New urban development standards for setbacks, right-of-ways, architectural, landscape,
open space, signs, parking, etc. are incorporated into the overlays as well as special
design standards for Economic Development uses.
The landowner's ability to develop their property in accordance with the underlying
zoning district is not hindered by the proposed overlay zones and there is a new deviation
process similar to that used with site plan wjlh /deviations.
The DSAC-LDR Subcommittee recommended approval of the proposed amendment
subject to staff revising the Overlay ensuring existing development rights are not
intentionally or unintentionally contravened or eliminated including building height and
uses and to clarifu language where i+ this may exist or where there is confusion.
Additionally, to require a minimum 10-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to
residentially zoned property.
Mr. Mclean movedfor the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend to the
Board of County Commissioners the proposed amendment be approved as presented subject to
Stoff ensuring the amendment does not intentionolly or unintentionally remove the existing
rights established in the underlying zoning distias (building height, use requirements, etc.)
and a 10 foot landscape buffer be required in areas where commercial development is adjacent
to residentially zoned properly. Second by Mr. Curl.
Mr. Curl queried dthe recommendations by the LDR Subcommittee as referenced in the
motion have been incorporated into the proposed amendment.
Mr. Johnson reported Staff did not incorporate the recommendations as outlined by the
Subcommittee.
Motion carried unonimously 13 - 0.
VII. Old Business
None
VIII. Committee Member Comments
Adjourn
Next Meeting Dates
September 2,2020 GMD Conference Room 610 - 3:00 pm
October 7,,2020 GMD Conference Room 610 - 3:00 pm
November 4,2020 GMD Conference Room 610 - 3:00 pm
IX.
Page 6 of7
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
August 5,2020
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order
of the Chair at 4:01PM.
COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPⅣIENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COⅣIⅣIITTEE
Thesc Minutes wcre approvcd by the Board/Chaillllan on__3/4塵 りaSpresented Ettl`:r as amended匡 二].
PageT of7
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
January 7, 2020
Page 1 of 4
MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
SUBCOMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, January 7, 2020
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Development Services Advisory Committee – Land
Development Review Subcommittee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein,
met on this date at 2:00 PM in REGULAR SESSION at the Growth Management Department Building,
Room 609/610 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL with the following persons present:
Chairman: Clay Brooker
Blair Foley (Excused)
Robert Mulhere (Excused)
Jeff Curl (Excused)
Mark McLean
ALSO PRESENT: Jeremy Frantz, LDC Manager
Ellen Summers, Senior Planner
Richard Henderlong, Principal Planner
Eric Johnson, Principal Planner
Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the audio recording
from the Collier County Growth Management Division – Planning and Regulation Building.
1. Call to order
Chairman Brooker called the meeting to order at 2:07 p.m. and a quorum could not be established.
He noted the purpose of the meeting will be to continue review of the proposed amendments as
presented by Staff. No actions will be taken by the Subcommittee.
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
January 7, 2020
Page 2 of 4
2. Approve agenda
There were no changes to the Agenda.
3. Old Business
a. Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District (GGPOD)
LDC Sections to be Amended: 1.08.01 Abbreviations DSAC-LDR 12-17-2019
2.03.07 Overlay Zoning Districts
2.05.01 Density Standards and Housing Types
4.02.26 Golden Gate Parkway Activity Center Overlay
(GGPACO) Building, Development, and Site Design Standards
4.02.37 Design Standards for Development in the Golden Gate
Downtown Center Commercial Overlay District (GGDCCO)
5.05.01 Businesses Serving Alcoholic Beverages
5.06.02 Development Standards for Signs within Residential
Districts
10.03.06 Public Notice and Required Hearings for Land Use
Petitions
The LDC amendment (LDCA) serves to implement several policies of the recently adopted
Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) by creating the Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District
(GGPOD). The GGPOD will be comprised of two new subdistricts - the Activity Center
subdistrict (GGPODAC) and the Downtown subdistrict (GGPOD-DT). The GGPOD will
supersede the provisions of the Golden Gate Downtown Center Overlay District and the Golden
Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial Overlay.
Mr. Johnson presented the proposed amendment and distributed an updated version of the
GGPOD to the Subcommittee.
Chairman Brooker noted the review is a continuation from the December 17, 2019 meeting.
The Subcommittee reviewed the proposed amendment by Section with discussion on the items:
Section 2.03.07 F.2.b – Members sought clarification on how the standards would be applied
given a property owner is allowed to utilize the property as prescribed in the underlying zoning
or the newly proposed overlay zone. After much discussion, staff clarified that the regulations
are intended to allow the uses from the underlying zoning district so as to not take away any
private property rights, but to allow the new uses proposed by the GGPOD; however, in either
instance, the new development standards proposed in LDC section 4.02.26 shall apply to all
properties within the GGPOD.
Section 2.03.07 F.5.a – The proposed GGPOD is comprised of two subdistricts an “Activity
Center” in middle of the overlay and a “Downtown subdistrict” located on the east and west ends
of the overlay. The intent is for the Activity Center is to promote uses that are more intense and
denser than those allowed in the downtown subdistricts as indicated in Table 1 of Section
2.03.07 F.6. – Mr. Frantz indicated that those uses, labeled employment uses, consist of several
uses that come from the State of Florida’s Qualified Targeted Industries list. The Subcommittee
noted the terms “Activity Center” and “Downtown District” may want to be included in the
definitions.
Section 2.03.07 F.6 – Table 1 (Business Services) – Staff to review the categories to clarify if
other business services are permitted as code number 7374 appears to be a subsection within the
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
January 7, 2020
Page 3 of 4
identified list. Staff presented a digital version to the DSAC-LDR, showing changes to the
Table, including but not limited to the elimination of Note #5 - restrictions related to escort
services, steam baths, and Turkish bath as well as striking out the term “advanced
manufacturing,” in favor of having a note at the bottom of the table referencing the “performance
standards” in LDC section 4.02.26 D. Consideration may want to be given to distinguishing the
types of services allowed in the Activity Center and Downtown subdistricts given the goals for
each area and the different existing characteristics of the subdistricts.
Section 2.05.01 A. – Staff changed the text to indicate per “the Golden Gate City Sub-Element
of the GGAMP.”
Section 4.02.26 A.1 – Staff to change the wording “….and these regulations.” to “… and these
design standards.”
Section 4.02.26 A.2. - Staff to change the wording “…Section 5.03.02 H is exempt for properties
…” to “Section 5.03.02 H does not apply to properties…”
Section 4.02.26 B.1 – change the word “developments” to “development”
Section 4.02.26 B.1 Table – Discussion occurred on allowing 100 percent building coverage and
whether any green space should be required. Staff noted the concept is to develop a downtown
district with zero lot lines. The development will be subject to stormwater treatment
requirements. When questioned if it would be more appropriate for the affected/impacted
property owners to opine on the Overlay before DSAC-LDR gets involved, staff noted that the
advisory committee for this area has not been established yet; however, the County did conduct
two public outreach meetings to obtain input Staff received feedback about building height and
character of development. Staff reminded the DSAC-LDR that the GGPOD is located within an
economic development zone.
Section 4.02.26 B.1 – Footnote #2 (lines 3-4) – Re-evaluate the term “extended sidewalk” to
ensure dual sidewalks are not created to serve the buildings. In these instances, planting/seating
areas or hardscapes should be incorporated as a treatment and clarified in the Section as
necessary.
Section 4.02.26 B.1 – Footnote #2 (line 4) – Discussion occurred on concerns for allowing a
balcony to overhang into a right of way. Staff to research the concept and provide examples for
the Subcommittee’s review.
Section 4.02.26 B.1 – Footnote #3 - Staff to reword the footnote to better clarify how the alley
will designate rear yard of a lot.
Section 4.02.26 B.2 – to read “Non-residential, mixed-use and multi-family buildings.
Non-residential, mixed-use and multi-family buildings in the GGPOD shall comply with the
following:”
Section 4.02.26 B.2.d – Discussion on the rationale for not allowing asphalt shingles on the
buildings with Staff noting the concept is to provide a certain consistent appearance to the
buildings in the overlay district.
Section 4.02.26 B.2.e – Staff to review language regarding corrugated and metal panels.
Section 4.02.26 B.2.f – Staff to review the language regarding neon tubing, LED tubing, etc. to
ensure the terms utilized meet the intended goal of the Section.
Section 4.02.26 B.2.h.ii – Staff to review language and consider height limitations for lighting
installed on the top levels of a parking structure.
Section 4.02.26 B.2.h.iii – Staff to review language in reference to the access points at the rear of
buildings to ensure it is clear on its intention.
4. New Business
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
January 7, 2020
None
5.Public comments
Felipe Arcila, SVN/Kova sought information on the costs of constructing parking structures with the
Subcommittee asking which was more expensive to construct, underground parking or structured
parking. The DSAC-LDR answered that the costs associated with structured parking ranges between
$12k-$14k per parking space whereas underground ranges is breaking $55k per space.
Yaimi Reyes, Here We Grow Daycare, commented that she owns the only child care center between
951 and Santa Barbara. The facility was built in 1985 and currently has nine parking spaces (with 12
employees and 90 kids). They purchased the abutting property with the purpose of expanding their
parking area. Ms. Reyes approached the DSAC-LDR at this meeting because she was told that she
either had to apply for a conditional use application or wait until the Overlay to be approved. Ms.
Reyes informed the DSAC-LDR that she intends to expand the off-street parking area as well as the
playground area. The area can be expanded, and if so, she could either wait for the Overlay to be
approved or go through the conditional use process. Staff commented that the GGPOD includes
proposed language regarding off-street parking, vehicular use, and service area standards. Staff would
have to determine if the proposed expansion conforms (or not conforms) to the standards. Staff
advised Ms. Reyes that she not make any business decisions based on the discussion at this meeting.
The DSAC-LDR advised that she continue monitoring the Overlay to make sure her plan is consistent
with it and for her to keep coming to these meetings to voice her opinions. The DSAC-LDR advised
that she meet with staff afterwards to assist her with options.
6. Next meeting date
TBD
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order
of the Chair at 4:07 P.M.
******
COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE - LAND DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE
_____________________________________________
Clay Brooker, Chairman
These Minutes were approved by the Committee on ___________, as presented _____, or as amended _____.
Page 4 of 4
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
February 19, 2020
Page 1 of 5
MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
SUBCOMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, February 19, 2020
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Development Services Advisory Committee – Land
Development Review Subcommittee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein,
met on this date at 2:00 P.M. in a REGULAR SESSION at the Growth Management Department
Building, Room 609/610 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL with the following persons present:
Chairman: Clay Brooker
Blair Foley
Robert Mulhere (Excused)
Jeff Curl
Mark McLean
ALSO PRESENT: Jeremy Frantz, LDC Manager
Ellen Summers, Senior Planner
Richard Henderlong, Principal Planner
Eric Johnson, Principal Planner
Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the audio recording
from the Collier County Growth Management Division – Planning and Regulation building.
1. Call to order
Chairman Brooker called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. and a quorum was established.
He noted the purpose of the meeting will be to continue review of the proposed amendment as
presented by Staff.
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
February 19, 2020
Page 2 of 5
Mr. Johnson reported the comments from the Subcommittee will be incorporated into the
document. The proposed amendment will be returned to the Subcommittee for final approval once
all the reviews have been completed and a new draft developed.
2. Approve agenda
Mr. Foley moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. McLean. Carried unanimously 4 – 0.
3. Old Business
a. Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District (GGPOD)
LDC Sections to be Amended: 1.08.01 Abbreviations DSAC-LDR 12-17-2019
2.03.07 Overlay Zoning Districts
2.05.01 Density Standards and Housing Types
4.02.26 Golden Gate Parkway Activity Center Overlay
(GGPACO) Building, Development, and Site Design Standards
4.02.37 Design Standards for Development in the Golden Gate
Downtown Center Commercial Overlay District (GGDCCO)
5.05.01 Businesses Serving Alcoholic Beverages
5.06.02 Development Standards for Signs within Residential
Districts
10.03.06 Public Notice and Required Hearings for Land Use
Petitions
Section 4.02.26 B.2.h.ii – The Subcommittee expressed concern on allowing lighting 20 feet in
height on top of a parking structure as the light may spill onto adjacent properties They
recommended the maximum height be retained but the pole be placed a minimum distance from
the perimeter of the structure of 2 times the height of the pole.
Section 4.02.26 B.3.a – The Subcommittee expressed concern on the minimum 5-foot wide
buffer for planting of vegetation. The requirement may not allow room for a sustainable planting
or be too narrow in width for planting of trees which may disturb roadways, walkways, etc.
proposed for the area. – Staff to consult on the issue and determine if new language should be
developed for the Section.
Section 4.02.26 B.3.b – strike the language “Where the parking structure is attached to the
building or adjacent to a preserve area, and the preserve area meets the otherwise required
landscaping, no additional landscaping is required.”
Section 4.02.26 B.2.c – to read “Off street parking lot and vehicular use area landscaping
shall…”
Speaker
Roylan Reyes, Here We Grow Daycare addressed the Subcommittee noting they have an
existing business in the overlay and are expanding their parking areas. He expressed concern on
the concept of requiring parking at the rear of buildings given it may not suit operational and
security/safety aspects of a business. The area is currently comprised of a certain type of
development and it is too late to try to change the nature of the area. Additionally, the goal
appears to be to re-develop a 5th Ave or Bayshore style neighborhood, which is not feasible given
the existing nature of the area.
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
February 19, 2020
Page 3 of 5
Chairman Brooker noted the amendment is being developed at the direction of the Board of
County Commissioners with Staff noting a deviation for the design criteria may be requested by
the landowner. Public input was derived during the process of amending the Golden Gate Area
Master Plan with many residents favoring the concepts.
Other Subcommittee Members noted consideration should be given on how to best address those
businesses that do not fit the vision of the neighborhood given many of them are now operating
in the proposed overlay.
Section 4.02.26 B.2.c.i – Same concern as cited in comments for Section 4.02.26 B.3.a regarding
the 5-foot width of the planting area.
Section 4.02.26 B.2.c.ii – Concern on allowing street walls for aesthetic reasons and whether
consideration would be given to allowing murals as in the Bayshore CRA – Staff to review,
noting murals are allowed in the Bayshore area as there is an arts district incorporated into the
neighborhood, a use not intended for this area.
Section 4.02.26 B.4 - line 4 to read “following provisions shall apply to all wall, awning,
ground …”
Section 4.02.26 B.4.c – line 2 to read “developments shall be provided for as follows; subject to
the following provisions:”
Section 4.02.26 B.4.d – Discussion occurred noting business plaques appear to only be allowed
for multi/occupancy or multi tenant uses with no reference to a sole use structure. Consideration
should be given to allowing these businesses to display the plaque – Staff to review including
reviewing any requirements for the sign code and propose additional language if necessary.
Section 4.02.26 B.4.d- line 3 - 4 to read for clarity “…the sign area shall not exceed eight square
feet.”
Section 4.02.26 B.5 – strike the wording in line 2 “for projects within the GGPOD”
Section 4.02.26 B.6.b – Discussion occurred on allowing certain treatments to count towards the
percent of open space required and the term structured open spaces. Additionally, the building
coverage is allowed at 100 percent of the lot area and the language may be conflicting - Staff
reported the language is intended to allow creativity and flexibility for treating open space and
will review the language and clarify the requirements if necessary.
Section 4.02.26 B.7 – delete the term “Enhanced” as it may lead to confusion by users and
simply cite “Internal Sidewalks.”
Section 4.02.26 B.8.c – Discussion occurred on the rationale for allowing lighting at lot lines to
exceed 0 footcandles (allowed up to 0.5 as currently proposed). Concern on neighbor impacts,
complaints and potential lawsuits regarding the lighting – Staff to review the language and
propose any changes if necessary.
Section 4.02.26 B.9.b.i and ii. – Discussion occurred on the section and the impacts on the
overall nature of the building construction as currently proposed including:
• The required distance between the finished floor and ceiling for the first floor.
• The term ceiling needs to be further clarified as above ceilings before the second floor
there is additional space for mechanical or lighting features.
• The overall elevation of the structure given there may be flood elevation requirements in
the area, requiring a BFE +1 (Base Flood Elevation) for the first floor.
• Would a sidewalk, which begins at grade and rises up along the frontage and returns to
grade to meet the buildings elevation requirements, be allowed?
• Clarifying the second story setback from facades and what is restricted in the setback area
such as the roof overhang, balconies stairwells, railings, awnings, etc.
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
February 19, 2020
Page 4 of 5
Staff noted:
• A determination should be made on the current (or newly proposed) BFE for the area so
any necessary standards may be developed.
• Parties should be aware uses in the overlay will not be subject to the requirements of
Section 5.05.08 – Architectural Standards.
• They will review the Section and propose new language as necessary.
Section 4.02.26 B.10.a – Discussion occurred on the requirements to provide areas for bus stop
loading/unloading, etc. and the installation of landing pads, bicycle storage racks, signage, etc. -
It was recommended these areas be allowed in the calculation for open space requirements as
discussed under Section 4.02.26 B.6.b.
Section 4.02.26 B.11.a – Staff to define the term “street trees.”
Section 4.02.26 B.11.a – Staff introduced new language on the requirements for utilities based
on conversations with the Public Utilities Department.
Discussion occurred noting the language may be too restrictive and lead to conflicts in the field
for existing or proposed infrastructure. It would be more advisable to ensure the language is
“recommended standards” accompanied by a cross section example for the user – Staff to review
the issue including consulting with representatives of the Public Utilities Department and report
back to the Subcommittee.
Section 4.02.26 C.iii – Discussion occurred on the parking requirements and concern the
standards may not provide for adequate onsite parking and lead to issues in the future such as
businesses not being able to expand. It was noted the concept is to reduce vehicle use in the area
and allow for a walkable neighborhood- Staff to review the proposed requirement including the 3
spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of restaurant space.
Section 4.02.26 C.2.e – Staff to clarify the intent of the Section regarding permission for valet
parking.
Section 4.02.26 D.8 - Discussion occurred on the definition of toxic or noxious matter. Concern
was expressed the term was too vague. Staff to review language to determine if it is necessary
to include it in the Section.
Section 4.02.26 D.9 – Concern certain commercial uses may require use of flammable or
explosive matter - The Subcommittee recommended relying on the National Fire Prevention
Association regulations to address any uses and/or reference the Code in the Section.
Section 4.02.26 E.1 – line 3 – 4 – delete the language “A deviation request may be reviewed
administratively or by the Office of the Hearing Examiner.”
Section 4.02.26 E.1.a-e – Reference the category heading for the LDC Sections cited so that the
user does not have to refer back to the LDC to determine, if they are applicable to their situation.
4. New Business
None
5. Public comments
None
6. Next meeting date
TBD
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
February 19, 2020
Page 5 of 5
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the
order of the Chair at 5:07 P.M.
******
COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE - LAND DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE
_______________________________________________
Clay Brooker, Chairman
These Minutes were approved by the Committee on ________, as presented ______, or as amended _____.
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
June 18, 2020
Page 1 of 3
MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
SUBCOMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, June 18, 2020
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Development Services Advisory Committee – Land Development
Review Subcommittee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 3:00
P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Growth Management Department Building, Room 609/610 2800 N.
Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL with the following persons present:
Chairman: Clay Brooker
Blair Foley (Excused)
Robert Mulhere
Jeff Curl
Mark McLean
ALSO PRESENT: Jeremy Frantz, LDC Manager
Ellen Summers, Bayshore CRA
Richard Henderlong, Principal Planner
Eric Johnson, Principal Planner
Alexandra Casanova, Operations Coordinator
Chris Scott, Development Review
Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the audio recording from the
Collier County Growth Management Division – Planning and Regulation building.
1. Call to order
Chairman Brooker called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. and a quorum was established.
2. Approve agenda
Mr. Curl moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Mulhere. Carried unanimously 4 – 0.
3. Old Business
a. PL20190002818 - RMF-6 Density Calculation
LDC Sections to be Amended: 1.08.00 Definitions
9.03.03 Types of Nonconformities
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
June 18, 2020
Page 2 of 3
The amendment clarifies the calculation of density for single-family, two family or duplex dwelling units
and multi-family units, on legal nonconforming lots of record in the RMF-6 District and the definition for
non-conforming lots of record and lot of record.
Mr. Henderlong and Mr. Scott presented the proposed amendment and provided an overview of the
changes which clarifies the dates and requirements for lots in the Coastal Area and Immokalee Area
planning districts.
Mr. Curl moved for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the Board of County
Commissioners approve the proposed amendment as presented by Staff. Second by Mr. Mulhere.
Carried unanimously 4 – 0.
b. PL20190002819 - Special Events in Rights-of-Way
LDC Sections to be Amended:
5.04.05 Temporary Events
5.04.06 Temporary Signs
10.03.06 Public Notice and Required Hearings for Land Use Petitions
The amendment establishes submittal requirements, criteria for review, and an approval process for
temporary special events that take place in or use County owned or maintained rights-of-way. It further
allows for the temporary placement of signage within rights-of-way.
Mr. Henderlong presented the proposed amendment noting it was previously reviewed by the
Subcommittee and their recommendations were incorporated into the proposed amendment. The
requirements are for those events proposed to utilize areas located within the County right of way,
including placement of signage.
The Subcommittee reviewed the proposed amendment and provided the following comments:
Section 5.04.05 A.5.b - Consideration should be given to allowing flexibility in the 120 and 60 day time
specific requirement given it is a long time frame before the event may occur. It may be beneficial to
allow a deviation by the County Manager, his designee, or other party.
Section 5.04.05 A.5.b.c.iii – Capitalize “Fire District”; ensure the word “County” is capitalized
throughout the document (where applicable).
Section 5.04.05 A.5.h – Consider developing a user-friendly document (“cheat sheet”) for informational
purposes so any interested party may use it for quick reference. This should include the requirements for
placement, location and maintenance of traffic being in accordance with the Federal Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices, as amended, and FDOT’s Roadway and Traffic Design standard plans. Another
option is to develop their own County requirements, given events are in the County right of ways and not
subject to FDOT review.
Section 5.04.05 B.1.b.i – In accordance with developing a cheat sheet, include requirements for placing
signs more than 15 calendar days prior to the supporting event and removing them within 15 calendar
days after the event has taken place.
Section 5.04.05 B.1.e.iii – Change the maximum allowable sign dimension from 24 by 32 inches to 24 by
36 inches, given this is a standard size sign board.
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
June 18, 2020
Page 3 of 3
Mr. Mulhere moved for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the Board of
County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment subject to incorporating the suggestions by
the Subcommittee. Second by Mr. McLean. Carried unanimously 4 – 0.
4. New Business
a. PL20200000268 - Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Early Entry Bonus Credits
LDC Sections to be Amended: 2.03.07 Overlay Zoning Districts
The amendment shall extend the effective time period for the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR)
early entry bonus credits from sending lands in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District.
Mr. Henderlong presented the proposed amendment.
Mr. Mulhere moved for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the Board of
County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment as presented by Staff. Second by Mr. Curl.
Carried unanimously 4 – 0.
5. Public comments
None
6. 2020 DSAC-LDR Subcommittee schedule reminder
a. September 15, 2020
b. December 15, 2020
Mr. Frantz reported the dates have been pre-selected for planning purposes, however if the Subcommittee
prefers scheduling on an as needed basis, they should notify Staff.
7. Adjournment
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order of
the Chair at 4:01 P.M.
*****
COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE - LAND DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE
_______________________________________________
Clay Brooker, Chairman
These Minutes were approved by the Committee on ______________, as presented ______, or as amended ______.
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
14.A.2Packet Pg. 118Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
14.A.2Packet Pg. 119Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
July 28, 2020
MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
SUBCOMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, July 28, 2020
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Development Services Advisory
Committee – Land Development Review Subcommittee in and for the County of
Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 2:00 PM in a REGULAR
SESSION at the Growth Management Department Building, Room 609/610 2800 N.
Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL with the following persons present:
Chairman: Clay Brooker
Blair Foley (via Zoom)
Robert Mulhere (via Zoom)
Jeff Curl (via Zoom)
Mark McLean
ALSO PRESENT: Jeremy Frantz, LDC Manager
Richard Henderlong, Principal Planner
Eric Johnson, Principal Planner
Alexandra Casanova, Operations Coordinator
Page 1 of 5
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
July 28, 2020
Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the audio recording
from the Collier County Growth Management Division – Planning and Regulation building.
The meeting was held via Zoom
1.Call to order
Chairman Brooker called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. and a quorum was established.
2.Approve agenda
Mr. Foley moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. McLean. Carried unanimously 5 – 0.
3.Old Business
a. Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District (GGPOD)
LDC Sections to be Amended: 1.08.01 Abbreviations DSAC-LDR 12-17-2019
2.03.07 Overlay Zoning Districts
2.05.01 Density Standards and Housing Types
4.02.26 Golden Gate Parkway Activity Center Overlay
(GGPACO) Building, Development, and Site Design Standards
4.02.37 Design Standards for Development in the Golden Gate
Downtown Center Commercial Overlay District (GGDCCO)
5.05.01 Businesses Serving Alcoholic Beverages
5.06.02 Development Standards for Signs within Residential
Districts
10.03.06 Public Notice and Required Hearings for Land Use
Petitions
The proposed amendment establishes the Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District (GGPOD), which serves
to implement several policies of the recently adopted Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The GGPOD will be
comprised of two new subdistricts: The Activity Center subdistrict (GGPOD-AC) and the Downtown
subdistrict (GGPOD-DT). The GGPOD shall supersede the current provisions of the Golden Gate
Downtown Center Overlay District and the Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial
Overlay.
Staff fielded comments from Committee Members and speakers on the proposal as noted below:
Mr. Mulhere
Section 2.03.07 F.2.d – consider removing the reference to PUD and simply cite properties
within the GGPOD.
Section 2.03.07 F.3, Mixed Use Definition – consider using language “residential, institutional
and commercial components” instead of residential or non residential wording (similar to
language found in Section 2.03.07 F.4.a.1).
Section 2.03.07 F.6.a/b – determine if there are any conflicts in other zoning requirements or
legal issues when allowing a business that utilizes a drive thru as an accessory use in the
GGPOD-DT, but prohibiting the business’s drive thru use feature in the overlay zone.
Section 4.05.02 E.4 – consider providing clarification on the parking requirement and if there are
limitations on a parking areas accessed by an alley.
Mr. Foley
Administrative Code Section 6, Deviations – Consider allowing an administrative process for
deviations to streamline the activity.
Page 2 of 5
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
July 28, 2020
Mr. Curl
Section 4.02.26 B.8.a – concern on allowing a 5-foot buffer for a non residential use adjacent to
single family residential zoned areas. It would be beneficial to require a 10-foot buffer for these
areas. Additionally, a 5-foot buffer may not provide adequate space for planting of certain tree
species and conflict with Sections of the Land Development Code conflict. This comment may
pertain to other Sections of the proposed amendment as well.
Section 4.02.26 B.8.d - Staff should review the language “None of the required foundation
plantings shall be located within perimeter buffers or within parking lot, vehicular use, or
service function areas” as it may be in conflict with the LDC and also contradicts Section
4.02.26 B.8.c.
Section 4.02.26 B.9.c.1 - consider allowing plaques in doorways facing down the sidewalk so a
passerby may more easily see the sign(s).
Section 4.02.26 B.12.b – concern on allowing lighting at lot lines to exceed 0-foot candles
(allowed up to 0.5 as currently proposed). Potential neighbor impacts and complaints.
Section 4.02.26 B.16.c – staff to check citations to the LDC to ensure they are the correct Section
(4.02.26 B.8) referenced.
Section 4.02.26 B.16.e.ii.f – ensure the requirement doesn’t imply or grant sole usage of the
spaces in front of the business and allows for mixed parking use for the businesses in the area.
Section 4.02.26 B.16.g.i – staff to check the LDC Section 4.02.26 B.8.c.ii. citation to ensure it is
correct.
Section 4.02.26 C.1 - consider allowing wingwalls for screening of the loading areas.
Types of Curb Required
Mr. Curl queried on whether the Type F curbs prescribed for the area are beneficial given they
do not constrain the roots of certain trees and Type E curbs may be more advantageous. It was
noted Type F curbs are mountable for emergency vehicles and Shawn Hanson, of Greater Naples
Fire District, who was present via Zoom, requested the Type F curbs be utilized in the area.
Speaker
Rich Yovanovich expressed concern on the overall tone of the language as in certain areas, it
may not protect the property owner’s rights under the current zoning. Additionally, drive-thrus
are usually an accessory use to certain businesses, such as fast food restaurants, pharmacies,
banks, etc., and may want to be considered for the overlay zones. He also questioned the
language in the following Sections:
Section 2.03.07 F.2.b – “Property owners within the GGPOD may establish uses, densities, and
intensities in accordance with the underlying zoning classification or the GGPOD. In either
instance, however, the density and intensity shall not exceed the maximum allowed pursuant to
the GMP. The design standards of the GGPOD pursuant to LDC section 4.02.26 shall apply.
It appears any density increases may not be allowed in the overlay zones based on the second
sentence.
Section 2.03.07 F.4.a.iii - The types of uses permitted within this subdistrict are low intensity
retail, office, personal services, institutional, and residential.
Expressed concern the C-4 zoning district doesn’t meet the characteristics of “low intensity”
retail, office, personal service, institutional and residential uses.
Section 4.02.26 B.1 – concern reducing the allowable building height to 60 feet in the GGPOD-
DT may be a disincentive to redevelop given the height allowed in the underlying district is 75
feet.
Page 3 of 5
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
July 28, 2020
Staff noted it is not the intent of the proposed amendment to remove any rights granted to
property owners in the underlying zoning district.
The Committee requested staff to ensure the language in the proposed amendment does not
jeopardize the ability for a landowner to develop his property as allowed in the underlying
zoning district.
Mr. Mulhere moved for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend to the
Board of County Commissioners the proposed amendment be approved as presented subject to
Staff ensuring the amendment does not intentionally or unintentionally remove the existing
rights established in the underlying zoning districts (building height, use requirements, etc.)
and a 10 foot landscape buffer be required in areas where commercial development is adjacent
to residentially zoned property. Second by Mr. McLean. Carried unanimously 5 – 0.
4. New Business
a.PL20200000359 – Self-Storage in C-4 Zoning District
LDC Sections to be Amended: 2.03.02 Commercial Zoning Districts
5.05.08 Architectural and Site Design Standards
The Amendment proposes to allow enclosed, indoor, air-conditioned self-storage use as a
Permitted Use when combined in the same building with other uses that are permitted in the C-4
Commercial Zoning District. It changes self-storage facilities from a Conditional Use to a
Permitted Use in the C-4 zoning district, but only if the self-storage use is combined in the same
building as with other permitted uses in the C-4 zoning district and occupies less than 50 percent
of the total area of the first floor and applies to all C-4 districts throughout the County.
Mr. McLean reported he is abstaining from the matter and filed the necessary forms to do so.
Staff fielded comments from Committee Members on the proposal as noted below:
Mr. Foley
Section 5.05.09 E.2.f.ii – The architectural theme for the entire building shall be consistent
throughout, in order to avoid having contrasting styles for each use. Consider using language
“The architectural design to be a consistent theme throughout in order…”
Mr. McLean
Concern on the overall language requiring the storage use to be “…in the same building” in
several places. If a facility is not located in a building with another use, it appears to preclude
developing a building that is 100 percent self storage.
Staff noted the change proposed is to allow the storage use within a building housing another
activity as a “Permitted Use.” If the facility is in a separate building for the sole purpose of self
storage, it will be processed as Conditional Use. These facilities are currently a Conditional Use
under the existing zoning requirements and there are no changes proposed to the current approval
process.
Page 4 of 5
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
July 28, 2020
Mr. Mulhere moved for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend to the
Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment as presented by Staff.
Second by Mr. Foley.
Mr. Mulhere amended the motion and moved for the Development Services Advisory
Committee to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed
amendment subject to revising Section 5.05.09E.2.f.ii to read “The architectural design to be
a consistent theme throughout, in order to avoid having contrasting styles for each use.”
Second by Mr. Foley. Carried unanimously 4 – 0. Mr. McLean abstained.
5.Public comments
None
6.2020 DSAC-LDR Subcommittee schedule reminder
a.August 18, 2020
b.September 15, 2020
c.December 15, 2020
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the
order of the Chair at 3:33 P.M.
******
COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE - LAND DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE
______________________________________
Clay Brooker, Chairman
These Minutes were approved by the Committee on _______, as presented ______, or as amended ______.
Page 5 of 5
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
This report reflects monthly data from: July 22, 2020 thru August 21, 2020
Code Enforcement Division Monthly Report
July 22, 2020 – August 21, 2020 Highlights
• Cases opened: 995
• Cases closed due to voluntary compliance: 635
• Property inspections: 3555
• Lien searches requested: 1720
Trends
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Aug-19 Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20
864 785
671
893
502
630 580
821
945
854 806
995Cases Opened Per Month
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Aug-19 Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20
3249 3306
3034
3240
2620
2374
2594
2870
3273
3839
3304
3555
Code Inspections Per Month
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
This report reflects monthly data from: July 22, 2020 thru August 21, 2020
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
2019 2020
3756
3967
4702
3058
Origin of Case
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Bayshore Immokalee
81 82
1291
1724 CRA
Case Opened
Monthly
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
This report reflects monthly data from: July 22, 2020 thru August 21, 2020
July 22, 2020 – August 21, 2020 Code Cases by Category
Case Type Common issues associated with Case Type
Accessory Use – Fence permits, fence maintenance, canopies, shades, guesthouse renting etc.
Animals – Prohibited animals, too many animals, etc.
Commercial - Shopping carts
Land Use – Prohibited land use, roadside stands, outdoor storage, synthetic drugs, zoning issues, etc.
Noise - Construction, early morning landscaping, bar or club, outdoor bands, etc.
Nuisance Abatement – Litter, grass overgrowth, waste container pits, exotics, etc.
Occupational Licensing – Home occupation violations, no business tax receipts, kenneling. etc.
Parking Enforcement - Parking within public right-of-way, handicap parking, etc.
Property Maintenance - Unsanitary conditions, no running water, green pools, structure in disrepair, etc.
Protected Species - Gopher Tortoise, sea turtles lighting, bald eagles, etc.
Right of Way - Construction in the public right-of-way, damaged culverts, obstruction to public right-of-way,
etc.
Signs - No sign permits, illegal banners, illegal signs on private property, etc.
Site Development -Building permits, building alterations, land alterations, etc.
Temporary Land Use - Special events, garage sales, promotional events, sidewalk sales, etc.
Vegetation Requirements – Tree maintenance, sight distance triangle, tree pruning, land clearing, landfill,
preserves, etc.
Vehicles - License plates invalid, inoperable vehicles, grass parking, RV parking, other vehicle parking
etc.
Animals
1%Accessory Use
2%Land Use
5%Noise
1%
Nuisance
Abatement
38%
Occupational Licensing
2%
Parking Enforcement
5%
Property Maintenance
7%
Right of Way
7%
Signs
6%
Site Development
8%
Vehicles
16%
Vegetation
Requirements
2%
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
This report reflects monthly data from: July 22, 2020 thru August 21, 2020
June 22, 2020 – July 21, 2020 Code Cases by Category
Case Type Common issues associated with Case Type
Accessory Use – Fence permits, fence maintenance, canopies, shades, guesthouse renting etc.
Animals – Prohibited animals, too many animals, etc.
Commercial - Shopping carts
Land Use – Prohibited land use, roadside stands, outdoor storage, synthetic drugs, zoning issues, etc.
Noise - Construction, early morning landscaping, bar or club, outdoor bands, etc.
Nuisance Abatement – Litter, grass overgrowth, waste container pits, exotics, etc.
Occupational Licensing – Home occupation violations, no business tax receipts, kenneling. etc.
Parking Enforcement - Parking within public right-of-way, handicap parking, etc.
Property Maintenance - Unsanitary conditions, no running water, green pools, structure in disrepair, etc.
Protected Species - Gopher Tortoise, sea turtles lighting, bald eagles, etc.
Right of Way - Construction in the public right-of-way, damaged culverts, obstruction to public right-of-way,
etc.
Signs - No sign permits, illegal banners, illegal signs on private property, etc.
Site Development -Building permits, building alterations, land alterations, etc.
Temporary Land Use - Special events, garage sales, promotional events, sidewalk sales, etc.
Vegetation Requirements – Tree maintenance, sight distance triangle, tree pruning, land clearing, landfill,
preserves, etc.
Vehicles - License plates invalid, inoperable vehicles, grass parking, RV parking, other vehicle parking
etc.
Animals
1%Accessory Use
1%Land Use
7%Noise
1%
Nuisance Abatement
44%
Occupational Licensing
1%
Parking Enforcement
5%
Property
Maintenance
8%
Right
of Way
5%
Signs
4%
Site Development
8%
Vehicles
12%
Vegetation
Requirements
3%
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
This report reflects monthly data from: July 22, 2020 thru August 21, 2020
May 22, 2020 – June 21, 2020 Code Cases by Category
Case Type Common issues associated with Case Type
Accessory Use – Fence permits, fence maintenance, canopies, shades, guesthouse renting etc.
Animals – Prohibited animals, too many animals, etc.
Commercial - Shopping carts
Land Use – Prohibited land use, roadside stands, outdoor storage, synthetic drugs, zoning issues, etc.
Noise - Construction, early morning landscaping, bar or club, outdoor bands, etc.
Nuisance Abatement – Litter, grass overgrowth, waste container pits, exotics, etc.
Occupational Licensing – Home occupation violations, no business tax receipts, kenneling. etc.
Parking Enforcement - Parking within public right-of-way, handicap parking, etc.
Property Maintenance - Unsanitary conditions, no running water, green pools, structure in disrepair, etc.
Protected Species - Gopher Tortoise, sea turtles lighting, bald eagles, etc.
Right of Way - Construction in the public right-of-way, damaged culverts, obstruction to public right-of-way,
etc.
Signs - No sign permits, illegal banners, illegal signs on private property, etc.
Site Development -Building permits, building alterations, land alterations, etc.
Temporary Land Use - Special events, garage sales, promotional events, sidewalk sales, etc.
Vegetation Requirements – Tree maintenance, sight distance triangle, tree pruning, land clearing, landfill,
preserves, etc.
Vehicles - License plates invalid, inoperable vehicles, grass parking, RV parking, other vehicle parking
etc.
Animals
1%Accessory Use
2%Land Use
7%Noise
1%
Nuisance Abatement
43%
Parking Enforcement
7%
Property Maintenance
9%
Right of Way
4%
Signs
3%
Site Development
8%
Vehicles
13%
Vegetation
Requirements
2%
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
Row Labels Sum of Amount Paid
113-000000-209101 94133.71
113-000000-209102 100
113-000000-209103 70149.67
113-000000-209105 3015.47
113-000000-209115 55326.11
113-000000-209601 1265.55
113-000000-209701 685
113-000000-209811 132351.19
113-000000-209815 72834.68
113-000000-209850 101156.52
113-138900-322125 55464.18
Grand Total 586482.08
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
Count of Reference Number Column Labels
Row Labels Greater Naples Fire Immokalee Fire North Collier BC Fire North Collier NN Fire Ochopee Fire (blank)Grand Total
113-000000-209101 273 273
113-000000-209102 1 1
113-000000-209103 18 473 18 509
113-000000-209105 17 2 7 26
113-000000-209115 224 2 226
113-000000-209601 3 2 5
113-000000-209701 4 4
113-000000-209811 78 29 107
113-000000-209815 111 111
113-000000-209850 32 32
113-138900-322125 396 2 15 24 437
Grand Total 731 52 100 781 17 50 1731
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
August 2020
Monthly Statistics
18/2020 Growth Management Department
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
Building Plan Review Statistics
8/2020 Growth Management Department 2
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-205,083 4,246 4,651 3,831 3,141 4,215 3,791 4,407 4,729 5,027 4,278 4,426 4,355 3,939 4,374 3,622 3,309 4,106 4,114 4,666 3,948 4,093 4,932 4,687 4,760 All Permits Applied by Month
Mechanical, 781
Well Permits, 119
Bldg
Add/Alt ,
298
Bldg New 1 & 2
Res, 311
Shutters/Doors/Windows,
667
Sign/Flagpole,
52 Roof, 552
Electrical,
337
Plumbing, 256
Solar, 66
Gas, 245
Aluminum
Structure, 219
Fence, 208
Pool, 196
ROW Residential,
117
Top 15 of 35 Building Permit Types Applied
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
Building Plan Review Statistics
8/2020 Growth Management Department 3
$-
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
Aug-18Nov-18Feb-19May-19Aug-19Nov-19Feb-20May-20Aug-20Monthly 1 & 2 Family Total
Construction Value by Applied Date
1&2 Family
$-
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
Aug-18Nov-18Feb-19May-19Aug-19Nov-19Feb-20May-20Aug-20Monthly Multi-family & Commercial Total
Construction Value by Applied Date
Multi-family Commercial
$-
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Monthly Total Construction Value by Applied Date
1&2 Family Multi-family Commercial
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
Building Plan Review Statistics
48/2020 Growth Management Department
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Aug-
18
Sep-
18
Oct-
18
Nov-
18
Dec-
18
Jan-
19
Feb-
19
Mar-
19
Apr-
19
May-
19
Jun-
19
Jul-
19
Aug-
19
Sep-
19
Oct-
19
Nov-
19
Dec-
19
Jan-
20
Feb-
20
Mar-
20
Apr-
20
May-
20
Jun-
20
Jul-
20
Aug-
20
Commercial 5 8 6 4 4 4 5 4 6 7 8 3 11 9 8 15 5 9 4 7 4 5 7 5 6
Multi-family 3 18 12 6 2 7 6 6 7 5 3 3 15 7 8 6 4 11 9 9 9 5 2 10 10
1&2 Family 251 223 213 232 194 316 218 261 251 254 250 274 263 285 306 235 182 232 234 250 192 205 196 234 296
New Construction Building Permits Issued by Month
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Aug-18Oct-18Dec-18Feb-19Apr-19Jun-19Aug-19Oct-19Dec-19Feb-20Apr-20Jun-20Aug-20New Multi-family Building
Permits Issued by Month
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Aug-18Oct-18Dec-18Feb-19Apr-19Jun-19Aug-19Oct-19Dec-19Feb-20Apr-20Jun-20Aug-20New Commercial Building
Permits Issued by Month
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
Building Inspections Statistics
8/2020 Growth Management Department 5
Electrical, 3,677
Gas,
893
Land
Development,
1,638
Pollution
Control, 4
Mechanical, 1,665
Plumbing, 2,921
ROW,
499
Septic,
153
Structural, 8,458
Well, 118
Types of Building Inspections
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-2025433211682641921380207502142122930230112424524005219342244323667223822664522760225452335521249233332023118720209712040220030Building Inspections
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
Land Development Services Statistics
8/2020 Growth Management Department 6
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20177 128 159 144 126 150 163 145 181 152 159 156 167 131 147 128 142 122 145 129 148 134 145 144 174 All Land Development Applications Applied by Month
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Site Development
Plan Insubstantial
Change
Zoning Verification
Letter
Vegetation
Removal Permit
Lot Split Utility Conveyance
Final Acceptance
111
101
90
44 38
Top 5 Land Development Applications Applied
within the Last 6 Months
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
Land Development Services Statistics
8/2020 Growth Management Department 7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-2035353427173930282427202825313615141827211217301912Pre-application Meetings by Month
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-2028 40 56 35 26 40 34 26 27 29 32 16 21 34 24 35 43 36 21 31 9 25 27 22 20 83686664595450685959545469607650636152271938535361Front Zoning Counter Permits Applied by Month
Temporary Use Commercial Certificates
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-205
3 3
2
4
3 3 3
2
1
2
3
1 1
6
4
2
1
3
4
3
2
3
0
2
Number of New Subdivisions Recorded per Month
Numberof SubdivisionsLand Development Services Statistics
8/2020 Growth Management Department 8
Yearly
Totals
2018 -43
2019 -31
2020 -18
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-2027
12
19
13 12 9
13 14
6 4
27
17
4 2
16 14
5 4
17
54
9 7
13
0
14Number of PagesPlat Pages Recorded per Month
Yearly
Totals
2018 -192
2019 -131
2020 -118
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
Land Development Services Statistics
8/2020 Growth Management Department 9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-2012108466991266104411751276496211Monthly Total of Subdivision Applications
(PSPA, PSP, PPL, PPLA, ICP, FP, CNST) by Month
-
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-2013 14 11 12 8 15 10 10 11 17 9 15 8 12 14 7 18 9 9 11 6 10 7 11 10 Monthly Total of Subdivision Re-submittals/Corrections
(PSPA, PSP, PPL, PPLA, ICP, FP, CNST) by Month
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
Land Development Services Statistics
8/2020 Growth Management Department 10
-
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-2034 38 34 30 32 32 34 28 38 36 34 37 37 28 26 33 24 40 45 32 38 27 30 37 42 Monthly Total of Site Plan Applications
(SIP, SIPI, SDP, SDPA, SDPI, NAP) by Month
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-2054254934382737544947495151455835462636343842293333Monthly Total of Site Plan Re-submittals/Corrections
(SIP, SIPI, SDP, SDPA, SDPI, NAP) by Month
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
Reviews for Land Development Services
8/2020 Growth Management Department 11
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-201,134 916 1,127 987 876 891 929 1,105 1,076 1,232 1,062 1,109 1,114 1,074 1,150 883 1,037 832 954 1,093 812 807 929 1,081 888 Number of Land Development Reviews
98.4
1.6
Percentage Ontime for the Month
Ontime Late
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
Land Development Services Statistics
8/2020 Growth Management Department 12
$0
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
$18,000,000
$20,000,000
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Total Applied Construction Valuation Estimate
Construction Estimate Utility Estimate
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20Inspections per monthSite & Utility Inspections
Final Subdivision Inspection Final Utility Inspection
Preliminary Subdivision Inspection Preliminary Utility Inspection
Tie In Inspection
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
Aug-
18
Sep-
18
Oct-
18
Nov-
18
Dec-
18
Jan-
19
Feb-
19
Mar-
19
Apr-
19
May-
19
Jun-
19
Jul-
19
Aug-
19
Sep-
19
Oct-
19
Nov-
19
Dec-
19
Jan-
20
Feb-
20
Mar-
20
Apr-
20
May-
20
Jun-
20
Jul-
20
Aug-
20
North Collier 48 42 83 55 37 43 51 48 44 46 57 50 35 60 69 50 56 57 39 48 38 36 33 42 33
Collier County(Greater Naples)65 47 56 54 60 77 63 66 82 72 71 66 76 59 66 63 63 57 72 62 48 62 62 52 61
Fire Review Statistics
8/2020 Growth Management Department 13
Total Number of Building Fire Reviews by Month
Total Number of Planning Fire Reviews by Month
Fire District
Fire District
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20DaysBuilding Fire Review Average Number of Days
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Aug-18Sep-18Oct-18Nov-18Dec-18Jan-19Feb-19Mar-19Apr-19May-19Jun-19Jul-19Aug-19Sep-19Oct-19Nov-19Dec-19Jan-20Feb-20Mar-20Apr-20May-20Jun-20Jul-20Aug-20DaysPlanning Fire Review Average Number of Days
Aug-
18
Sep-
18
Oct-
18
Nov-
18
Dec-
18
Jan-
19
Feb-
19
Mar-
19
Apr-
19
May-
19
Jun-
19
Jul-
19
Aug-
19
Sep-
19
Oct-
19
Nov-
19
Dec-
19
Jan-
20
Feb-
20
Mar-
20
Apr-
20
May-
20
Jun-
20
Jul-
20
Aug-
20
North Collier 730 563 608 432 419 471 447 596 645 711 729 725 709 621 688 488 470 410 458 633 565 510 642 645 564
Collier County (Greater Naples)456 296 453 447 325 421 327 475 443 395 339 386 426 365 481 388 359 476 361 397 355 324 462 418 409
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services Advisory Committee -September 2, 2020)
PAPERLESS PERMIT
PROJECT
Process Improvement
Danny.Condomina@colliercountyfl.gov
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services
A Glance at Electronic Plan Review (EPR)
Paper
Electronic
Building Applications
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services
A Glance at Electronic Plan Review (EPR)
Paper
Electronic
Planning Applications
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services
Paperless
Permit
Project
•Moving towards 100% electronic plan
review (EPR) and submittal.
With the onset of the COVID 19 pandemic,
building applications are now exceeding
80% electronic submittal
Planning applications exceed 60%
•What are we trying to improve?
Streamline business process
Dedicating resources to one process.
Record Keeping
Visibility and Accountability
Continuity of business
Increase reporting capabilities
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services
Paperless
Permit
Project
What stays business as usual?
•Customer consultations
•Payments
•Records
•Scheduling inspections
•Other existing non-EPR services (Zoning Certifications, Temporary Use Permits, Business Tax Receipts, etc.)
Additional Customer service!
•Online EPR training by appointment
•Front counter EPR portal information
•Updated EPR videos and job aids on E-Permitting webpage
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services
EPR Hard Date: 12/18/2020
Drop Off End Date: 12/1/2020
Customer Training Start Date: 11/1/2020
Public Announcement 10/1/2020
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services
TOP 5 Application Paper Submittals
Planning ApplicationsBuilding Applications
January 2020 –July 2020
14.A.2
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: 9-2-2020 DSAC FINAL Meeting Packet (13487 : Development Services