The URL can be used to link to this page

CAC Agenda 07/21/20207/16/2020 July 21, 2020 1 Collier County, FL July 21, 2020 Meeting Agenda and Notice Coastal Advisory Committee (CAC) Tuesday, July 21, 2020 - 12:00 P.M. Collier County Board Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Third Floor, Naples, FL Sunshine Law on Agenda Questions 2020 CAC MEETING DATES I. Call to Order II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Roll Call IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda V. Public Comments VI. Approval of CAC Minutes June 11, 2020 VII. Staff Reports Expanded Revenue Report VIII. New Business 1. Presentation from Linda Colombo from Friends of Tiger -tail Beach on Dredging Portions of Tigertail Lagoon 2. USACE Beach/Storm Surge Feasibility Study Tentative Selected Plan (TSP), 3. City of Naples Pre -spend Request on Pier Repairs o Naples Pier Corrosion Mitigation o Bid Analysis Naples Pier o Pier Renovation Agreement Letter IX. Old Business X. Announcements XI. Committee Member Discussion XII. Next Meeting Date/Location September 10, 202o at 1:0o p.m. XIII. Adjournment https://www.col liercountyfl.gov/your-governmentladvisory-boards-and-authorities/coastal-advisory-committee/cac-agendas/2020-cac-agendas/ju ly-21-... 1 /2 7/16/2020 July 21, 2020 1 Collier County, FL All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the board prior to the meeting if applicable. For more information, please contact Gary McAlpin at (239) 252-5342• If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 3411.2, (239) 252-8380. Public comments will be limited to 3 minutes unless the Chairman grants permission for additional time. Collier County Ordinance No. 99-22 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners) before the Board of County Commissioners and its advisory boards, register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. https://www.coll iercountyfl.gov/your-governmentladvisory-boards-and-authorities/coastal-advisory-committee/cac-agendasl2020-cac-agendasljuly-21-... 2/2 June 11, 2020 MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Naples, Florida, June 11, 2020 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 3:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F", 5th Floor, Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: David Trecker VICE CHAIRMAN: Joseph Burke Steve Koziar (via telephone) Thomas McCann (Excused) Jim Burke Robert Raymond Erik Brechnitz (arrived at 3:30 p.m.) Robert Roth (Excused) Raymond Christman ALSO PRESENT: Gary McAlpin, Manager, Coastal Zone Management Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney I June 11, 2020 Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the video recording from the Collier County Communications and Customer Relations Department or view online. I. Call to Order Chairman Trecker called the meeting to order at 3:00 P.M. II. Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. III. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. Mr. Raymond moved to allow Mr. Koziar to participate in the meeting via telephone due to an extraordinary circumstance. Second by Mr. Joseph Burke. Carried unanimously S - 0. Chairman Trecker welcomed Raymond Christman to the Committee. IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda Mr. Raymond moved to approve the Agenda subject to removing Item #9 - Friends of Tigertail Discussion of the Tigertail Lagoon Dredging. Second by Mr. Joseph Burke. Carried unanimously 6 —0. V. Public Comments None VI. Approval of CAC Minutes 1. January 23, 2020 Mr. Joseph Burke moved to approve the minutes of the January 23, 2020 as submitted. Second by Mr. Raymond. Carried unanimously 6 — 0. VII. Staff Reports 1. Expanded Revenue Report The Committee reviewed the "FY20 TDTRevenue Report" through April 30, 2020. Mr. McAlpin reported that the recent reductions in projected tourist tax collections should not have a negative impact on budgeted expenditures as the County has approximately $40M unallocated funds held in reserve for beach projects. VIII. New Business 1. 2020-2021 Tourist Development Council (TDC) Fund 195 Grant Application Requests • Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Grant Applications • TDC 2021 Category A Grant Application - Beach Maintenance • TDC 2021 Category A Grant Application - Pier Maintenance • Turtle Monitoring Grant Application Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve the Tourist Development Council Grant application requests from the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island and Collier County for FY-2020-2021 in the amount of $5, 742,100; budget these expenditures; approve agreement, and make a finding that these expenditures will promote tourism " for consideration. He noted that the recommendations on the requests will be sought from the Coastal Advisory Committee and Tourist Development Council before forwarding the item to the Board of 2 June 11, 2020 County Commissioners who have the ultimate authority to approve the proposed grants. The Committee reviewed the following Grant requests: Beach Renourishment Proiects Naples Beach FY 2021 Beach Renourishment Program — 90068 - $2, 000, 000 USACE Feasibility Study Technical Support — 80366 - $150, 000 Local Government Funding Request (LGFR) — 90065 - $25, 000 Total $2,175, 000 Inlet Proiects Wiggins Pass Monitoring — 80288 - $25, 000 Collier Creek Permit, Jetty Rework and Channel Training — 90072 - $1,100, 000 Total $1,125, 000 Ret!ulatory Beach Tilling — Collier County — 80171 - $30, 000 Biological Monitoring Nearshore Hardbottom — 90033 - $185, 000 Shorebird Monitoring - 90297 — $25, 000 Physical Beach and Pass Monitoring — (Vanderbilt, Clam Pass Beach, Park Shore, Naples and Marco South Beaches along with Wiggins, Doctors, Collier Creek and Caxambas Pass) - $170, 000 Sea Turtle Protection Program — 9999 - $170, 000 Total $580,000 Beach Maintenance Beach Maintenance — City of Naples — 90527 - $197, 000 Beach Maintenance — Collier County/Marco Island — 90533 - $354,200 Heavy loadout Ramp/Access - Collier Blvd — 80407 - $25, 000 $571,200 Structures Naples Pier Repair & Maintenance - 90096 (Category D) - $135, 600 Administration 195 Administration Costs — 90020 - $75, 000 185 Project Management and Administration — 99195 - $846, 000 Tax Collector Fee's (2.5%) — 99195 - $155,300 Total $1,155, 300 Total, for All Grant Requests - $5, 742,100.00 Mr. Joseph Burke moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the Tourist Development Council Grant application requests from the City of Naples, the City of Marco 3 June 11, 2020 Island and Collier County for FY-2020-2021 in the amount of $5,742,100; budget these expenditures; approve agreement, and finds these expenditures will promote tourism. Second by Mr. Raymond. Carried unanimously 6 — 0. Mr. Brechnitz arrived at 3: 30 p.m. 2. 10-Year Plan • Fiscal Year 2021 10-Year Plan Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve the FY20121 10- Year Capital Planning document for Fund 195-Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance and Fund 185 Program Management and Administration and make a finding that these expenditures promote tourism " for consideration. He provided an overview of the Plan which identifies projections for income and expenditures over 10 year period. Mr. Raymond moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the "FY20121 10-Year Capital Planning document for Fund 195-Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance and Fund 185 Program Management and Administration" and finds these expenditures promote tourism. Second by Mr. Joseph Burke. During Committee discussion, the following was noted: • That the document is for planning purposes and required by State. • The plan incorporates anticipated expenditures for the recommendations being developed by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for beach resiliency projects in the County. Collier County will be responsible for 35 percent of the project's costs. • A draft of the plan will be made available to the public in July of 2020 and is anticipated to be approved by the USACE in approximately 18 months. Motion carried unanimously 7 — 0. 3. 2020/21 Beach Renourishment ES (passed by the Board of County Commissioners on May 26, 2020) Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve the fall truck haul beach renourishment project for the Naples Beach from Doctors Pass south to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) beach monument R-60 scheduled for November 2020 with a not -to -exceed project cost of $2, 000, 000; authorize all necessary budget amendments; and make a finding that this item promotes tourism (Project 90068) " for consideration. He provided an overview of the upcoming work and the item is an "after the fact" approval for the record, given the Board of County Commissioners already approved the expenditure. It is anticipated the State of Florida will provide a reimbursement of a portion of the funds expended for the project. Mr. Joseph Burke moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the fall truck haul beach renourishment project for the Naples Beach from Doctors Pass south to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) beach monument R-60 scheduled for November 2020 with a not -to -exceed project cost of $2,000,000, authorize all necessary budget amendments; and finds this item promotes tourism (Project 90068). Second by Mr. Jim Burke. During Committee discussion, the following was noted: C! June 11, 2020 • That the County coordinates the transportation of sand with Lee County officials given the source of the material is in Immokalee and the route for the haul includes Corkscrew Road. • The County performs inspections on the material delivered to ensure the quality and quantity delivered to the site meets specifications. • The project is slated to begin in November and anticipated to be completed by January 1, 2021. • The County notifies affected landowners on the project and Mr. McAlpin is available to meet with City of Naples officials should they request a presentation on the project. Motion carried unanimously 7 — 0. 4. Taylor Engineering Contract Award ES • Taylor Engineering Work Order Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve a work order with Taylor Engineering, Inc., to provide professional engineering services for Naples Beach Renourishment from just south of Doctors Pass to Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) reference monument R-60 under Contract No. 18- 7432-CZfor time and material not to exceed $102,585 and make a finding that this item promotes tourism" for consideration. He noted that it is a companion to Item #3 and is an "after the fact" approval request for the CAC. Mr. Christman moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve a work order with Taylor Engineering, Inc., to provide professional engineering services for Naples Beach Renourishment from just south of Doctors Pass to Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) reference monument R-60 under Contract No. 18-7432-CZ for time and material not to exceed $102,585 and finds the item promotes tourism. Second by Mr. Joseph Burke. Carried unanimously 7 — 0. 5. ES for CSA Ocean Sciences (CSA) Hardbottom Monitoring • CSA 2020 Hardbottom Monitoring Proposal Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve the proposal by CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc. to continue the required post -construction hardbottom monitoring for the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project in summer 2020 with CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc. for Time and Material not to exceed $159, 997.30 under the already approved and executed Contract No. 17- 7188, authorize the chairman to execute the work order for the proposed services, and make a finding that this item promotes tourism" for consideration. He noted that the work will be completed during July and August of 2020. Mr. Jim Burke moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposal by CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc., to continue the required post -construction hardbottom monitoring for the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project in summer 2020 with CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc., for Time and Material not to exceed $159,997.30 under the already approved and executed Contract No. 17-7188, authorize the chairman to execute the work order for the proposed services and finds the item promotes tourism. Second by Mr. Raymond. Carried unanimously 7 — 0. 6. ES Aptim Local Government Funding Request (LGFR) • Aptim 2021-2022 LGFR Proposal Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve a work order with APTIM Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.; to provide professional engineering services for 2021- 5 June 11, 2020 2022 Local Government Funding Request under Contract No. 18- 7432-CZfor time and material not to exceed $22, 713.99, authorize the Chairman to execute the work order, and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. " He noted that the work is to assist the County with their cost sharing expenditures reported to the State. Mr. Raymond moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve a work order with APTIM Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.; to provide professional engineering services for 2021-2022 Local Government Funding Request under Contract No.18-7432-CZ for time and material not to exceed $22, 713.99, authorize the Chairman to execute the work order, and finds the item promotes tourism. Second by Mr. Koziar. Carried unanimously 7 — 0. 7. ES Water Quality Recommendations Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve the recommended approach to address the Water Quality Improvement within Collier County and make a recommendation for approval to the Board of County Commissioners " for consideration. Mr. Trecker, Chairman of the Subcommittee provided an overview of the Subcommittees work which was convened to address water quality issues in relation to toxic algae and red tide in the County. Three recommendations have been identified for the Board of County Commissioners to consider: 1. Improve compliance with the County's fertilizer ordinance. 2. Form a working group to meet with lawn/landscape maintenance companies that work in Collier County to ensure the necessary training and certification to comply with the fertilizer ordinance. and the understanding to adjust fertilizer levels when using recycled water for irrigation. 3. Make a recommendation as to the cost -benefit of installing Advanced Wastewater Treatment to reduce nutrient levels in recycled irrigation water. Mr. Raymond moved to recommend the Subcommittee's approach to address the Water Quality Improvement within Collier County and recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the recommendations. Second by Mr. Joe Burke. Carried unanimously 7 — 0. 8. 2020 Annual Monitoring Report — Draft Mr. McAlpin provided the "Collier County Beach Renourishment Project 2020 Post Construction Annual Monitoring Summary — May 2020 " for informational purposes. IX. Old Business 1. Verbal Update Feasibility Study - United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Mr. McAlpin reported: • That the plan is being developed to improve beach resiliency for the County due to potential impacts to the beaches and back bays from storm surge. • The plan will be funded by a 50 year grant and includes proposed changes to the County's Coastal Infrastructure. The work is anticipated to be completed in a phased approach based upon available funding at the time. • A draft of the plan is anticipated for July 2020, at which time public comment will be sought. • The County is not required to implement any or all aspects of the plan and may develop their own projects, however they will be responsible to fund the work they propose not in accordance with the plan. X. Announcements n June 11, 2020 None XI. Committee Member Discussion None XII. Next Meeting Date/Location TBD There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 4:50 P.M. Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee David Trecker, Chairman These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on as presented or as amended 7 USACE FEASIBILITY STUDY COLLIER COUNTY'S STORM SURGE PROTECTION TENTATIVELY SELECTED PLAN (TSP) Risk from coastal storms and their damage mechanisms like beach erosion, wave action, and storm surge threaten damage to and loss of residential and commercial structures, critical infrastructure, environmental resources, and economic livelihood. The qW, Ir for Collier County's Storm Surge Protection ■ Renourish the beaches higher and wider ■ Protection from Back Bay flooding ■ Structural and Nonstructural protection features ■ Divide County into major study areas ■ Approx. 50% through a 3 year, $3M federal study, 3 levels of USACE review ■ Program flexibility for design, execution and scope development ■ 50 year grant with 35% County Cost Share 1 SMART Feasibility Study Process: SCOPING & PLANNING STRATEGY i ALTERNATIVE FORMULATION & ANALYSIS PLAN FORMULATION STRAT • Beaches are a required component of the comprehensive system, and risk cannot be reduced along the inland bays if beach berm and dune are not included • Planning Areas were determined by identifying reaches where we could hydraulically isolate inland structures from the effects of storm surge in adjacent inland bays and drainages • Allow water levels (including surge), wave run-up, and overtopping analysis to develop the inland elevation up to which benefits could be reasonably maximized (structure inventory) • Phased analysis in that the beach profile and associated level of risk reduction informs how large to scale the inland bay alternatives. • Conduct reciprocating analysis whereby the wall heights of structural measures in a given planning area inform the height of beach features, vice versa K, EXIST Structure Type Structure Value Retail 2,300,000 Tourism 13,300,000 Hotel 23,000,000 High Rise Hotel 319,900,000 Single Family Residential 356,200,000 Multi -Family Residential 143,600,000 High Rise Multi -Family Residential 2,613,300,000 Munici al/Parks/NonProfit 13,400,000 Total Beach 3.485.000.000 7RU BEACHES Contents Value $ Total $ % of Total Value 600,000 2,900,000 0.1 % 3,300,000 16,600,000 0.4% 5,900,000 28,900,000 0.7% 81,900,000 401,800,000 10% 178,100,000 534,300,000 13% 14,200,000 157,800,000 4% 258,700,000 2,872,000,000 71 % 2,700,000 16,200,000 0.4% 545.400.000 4.030.400.000 100% INLAND BAY AREAS Structure Count 2 12 8 8 423 119 132 11 715 TORY Structure Type Structure Value $ Contents Value $ Total $ % of Total Value Structure Count Retail 337,600,000 150,400,000 488,000,000 0.02 761 Commercial 2,288,400,000 564,400,000 2,852,800,000 0.10 1,654 Hotel 228,400,000 51,000,000 279,400,000 0.01 123 Medical 376,500,000 160,300,000 536,800,000 0.02 15 Industrial 505,300,000 187,000,000 692,300,000 0.02 645 Education 171,200,000 12,000,000 183,200,000 0.01 88 Single Family Residential 10,301,400,000 5,173,000,000 15,474,500,000 0.54 31,624 Multi -Family Residentail 6,703,900,000 668,600,000 7,372,500,000 0.26 6,872 Municipal/Parks/Nonprofit 499,500,000 74,800,000 574,300,000 0.02 547 1.00 42,329 Total Back Bay 21,412,300,000 7,041,600,000 28,453,900,000 L J LJ w ILA *Note Beach Structures are also included in Inland Bay Areas for comprehensive analysis purposes, but overlapping benefits associated with these structures will be subtracted for these structures 5 FOCUSED STUDY AREAS Planning beaches Area l - Aeea 2 Area 3 Q Area 4 Q Area 5 - Area b ri pa= Sjrntn r+ikhnrpoqh O da Plnela: pdk IndiaFl Ma b_ Hatdee t* DeSW Ffghtends 5t. L Sammo Marro q��hk#e GI'd� I palm txe Henke Beach n&, Broward g,i M#NCR � QELLI MEADIE :so E pqq R Ai ice_ OL❑ GRDVE PIraim,p 5tra,d Siste Forest r T&rM� _ � Thoa•sard �s fdarr lvrrrtirre Rer DilRA N D D 2.5 5 1 D FOCUSED STUDY AREAS 7 >�R- a . Planning Area 1 R-10Q1 - RINGS R-002 • R•003 R-004 MA23 R_005 �-oas -ao7 n�A R-ore R-04 - R-012 • _ R-01 • - I�-014 • R-al ■ MA02 R-4116 R-417 • R-41 a • R-019 JF R-020 MAQ3 R-02 ; R-022 �-023 R•024 04 R-027 M A.05 R-07@ R-020 R-030 • R•031 • R-032 • R•U38 • R•03d • R-�35,• Rdr36 . • F. 1 � - MA24 + m v 3 2 � x PELICAN BAY � ,4" uc, F 0 OrangiO�5 ssprn Lit \' I FOCUSE D STUDY AREAS a-029 Planning Area 2 VANDER5, BEACH MA06 i�Z-L'�3l ■ i F � G v x Fi•03 • � � MA07 In R-73 2 R-Q3 �• R-04 • Ft 041 R 04 • r.. • 1 R -0 . fMAOB R-,t.1 a PINE R1bGE EDCAM BAY NORTH �, - N XPL E rc M m w Pine AidgC Rd N r� N9il�s� FOCUSED STUDY AREAS 0 Monuments -o44PIanning Area R-045 • I MAU9 MA26 s R-o48 . R-a49 • I�•fl54 ■ M10 R-051 R-052 f R-053 • r— C - R-054 MA11 R-055 3 R•D5E R•057 ■ MA-27 MA12 R-[i58� R-t�54 MAD R-OSO � R-QB2 R-463 • �. MAA 4- C E: G1310er, Gale 1 Langb,mi Dr r r. 2 A Miles • FOCUSED STUDY AREA�iS. Planning Area 4 R-061A AVU 17 R-015 R-00$ A I Col t R-015R 0 R-070 R-071 MA17 R-074 0 F-075 • R-076 m Is 41 R-077 ■ 4 R-078 MA29 B a reolt Avc, R-080 MA19 Guilford Rd R-0131 R-M R-083 R-084 R--385 0 C, rd#,. R-OK R.n,97 m 21 R-08 0 � A22 M1onumenks R-000 0 I � Miles FOCUSED STUDY AREAS Planning Area 5 Le[ • I dagwo❑d way o' Jv � 3 Cal6p' z Green Wva See Grass L, Il 4; ice- A Us 0 G #y Gold9f' �y f- osa lres MA28 - R-062 2 R-063 � R-005 � r R-DBB • R-067 • R-068 • R-069 • Fi-470 0► ". R-071 0 a NAPLES as ' R-072 # R-073 i n fierce 9 R-074 i o_ Gal€ 8 IR•075 •° c Cou-tfy R-076 �►{ R-077in m } R-078 a R-67ff • a a R-680 • A] R-081 0.5 1 • Monuments I �98 FOCUSED STUDY AREAS :Td Planning Area 6 V-304 j7-y V-305 a J, V-307 0 r1143 0 k L V-nos 'm �I V-si 0 VLM V-31 ,J-31 R R- a R-137 MM2 MA-5j ry R-138 6 R-140'* M� 3 R-141 R-142 A3 "3 R-144C4 MAT5 R-145 R- I A6 MA36 R-147 R-148 MA-3-7- V-322 • V-323 V-324 • numen V-325 �r-d 6 0 f-4-5 I V-347 0 ESTIMATED SEA LEVEL CHANGE PR04&CTIONS� ❑ Per the USACE sea level change curve calculator, NOAA gage #8725520 at Naples, FL, is the nearest compliant gage for estimating relative sea level change (RSLC) trends for the project area ❑ Starting water level is adjusted from 1992 to the base year of 2030 ❑ The intermediate curve is believed to represent a reasonable estimate of RSLC G 4 3 2 I 41 Estimate Relative Sea Level Change Projections - Gauge; $725110, Naples. FL - USACE H gh - USAGEIM - VSACIE LW 2000 201D 2020 2030 204D 2050 20O0 2070 2060 209D 2100 Year Year 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2079 USACE Low ft. USACE Int. ft. USACE Hi h ft. 0.21 0.55 0.89 1.30 1.79 2.35 2.99 3.62 0.17 0.20 0.26 0.33 0.36 0.48 0.45 0.65 0.54 0.84 0.64 1.05 0.73 1.27 0.81 1.49 2080 0.82 1.51 3.69 2090 0.92 1.77 4.48 Am 2100 1.01 2.05 5.33 2110 1.10 2.34 6.27 2120 1.20 2.65 7.27 2130 1.29 2.98 8.35 -JO ��RACKER, NAPILS, FL. Sea Level. Rise with USAC E SLC Scenarios For Naples, rL c87z51io� Actrve orao ooffpbmi &�Je 9GUge 1970 1975 1596 1 N5 High SLC ■ Intermediate SLC L Low SLC 2079 Sea Ley. eI • MSL Monthly Average 19-Year MSL Moving Average a Linear Trend Value fof MSL (entire period of record) A 5- = MSL Moving Average ► Linear Trend of MSL December, 1979 - December, 201 • The 19-year MSL moving average and the 40-year MSL linear trend line both track the USACE Intermediate curve more closely than the High curve • 5-year MSL moving average indicates a higher rate of SLC in recent years- tracking closer to the High curve since -2014; however this trend is more volatile to changes in observed sea levels 2005 2010 2015 2020 WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS ❑ Study area water levels updated using FEMA SW Florida Storm Surge Study raw statist) ERDC (FEMA IDIQ Contract HSFEHQ-09-D-0369, FEMA Region IV HSFE04-13-J-0097 Still Water Levels Reaches 1 Barefoot Beach R1 - R9 2 Barefoot Beach Preserve R9 - R16 3 Wiggins Pass State Park R16 - R22 4 Vanderbilt Beach R22 - R29 5 Pelican Bay R29 - R41 6 Clam Pass State Park R41 - R46 7 Park Shore R46 - R57 8 Naples Beach R58 - R79 9 Gordon Pass Reach R79 - R89 North County Beaches R1 - R89 10 Marco Island Beach R136 - R147 11 Cape Marco R147 - R148 Marco Island R136 - R148 1% AnnualExceedance Probability Water Level Elevations FT NAVD88 Length FT Year 2018 Year 2030 Year 20, 8090 10.74 10.90 11.91 7095 10.41 10.57 11.58 5230 10.27 10.43 11.44 7100 10.09 10.25 11.26 12145 10.27 10.43 11.44 4800 10.24 10.40 11.41 11590 9.96 10.12 11.13 19340 8.89 9.05 10.06 9890 8.56 8.72 9.73 85280 9.81 9.97 11.22 12200 9.31 9.47 10.48 1750 9.17 9.33 10.34 13950 9.25 y STRUCTURAL MEASURES CONSIDERED Structural Measure Enhance Dune Geometries (height/width) Enhance Berm Geometries (heiaht/width) Measure Carried Forward (Y/N) Y Y Seawall behind beach Y Storm Surge Barriers Y Pump Stations N Breakwaters/Wave Attenuation Devices (WADs) Groins Artificial Reefs Floodwalls Rip Rap/ Stone Revetment Rubble Reef u Y N Y N 1►1 Discussion A primary method for combating storm surge; least environmental impacts expected. A primary method for creating standoff and wave attenuation; least environmental impacts expected. A primary method for protecting against storm surge; assured critical mass that won't erode. A primary method of preventing inland bay interior flooding. Not a stand-alone measure. May be required in seawall design; already part of required engineering analysis of upland flooding. Also included as part of storm surge barrier and floodgate designs. A primary method for wave attenuation; already used successfully within the project area. A primary method for combating shoreline erosion and sand loss; already used successfully within the project area. May be part of environmental mitigation plan; provides no benefits that contribute to planning objectives. A primary method for preventing inland bay flooding and arotectina aaainst storm surae. Not applicable to problems within the project area; erosion not causing steep slopes, escarpments, or cliffs. Designed for use offshore; intended for habitat restoration. Ring Levee N Not appropriate for protecting segmented reaches of shoreline; cost prohibitive. a NONSTRUCTURAL MEASURES CONSIDERED Nonstructural Measure Elevate Structures Reduce Risk to Critical Infrastructure Floodproofing Acquisition/Buyouts Retreat Based on Elevation Revise Building Code (min. elev.) Develop Comprehensive Evacuation Plan Revise Hurricane Response Plan Revise Emergency Preparedness Plan Measure Carried Forward (Y/N) Discussion _ Appropriate for single family homes where Y economically justified. Strategy to allow communities to more quickly Y recover from a storm event. Appropriate for large high-rise condominiums; less Y costly than levees. Y Appropriate to remove people and resources out of high risk areas where economically justified. N Not cost effective or practical on any scale. N Could be a recommendation of the study, but outside the scope of work. _ Already developed by the County, could be a N recommendation in the final report, but outside the scope of work for this study. Already developed by the County, could be a N recommendation in the final report, but outside the scope of work for this study. Already developed by the County, could be a N recommendation in the final report, but outside the scope of work for this study. 10 NATURAL AND NATURE BASED FEATURES CONSIDERED Nonstructural Measure 'Vegetative Dune Plantings Oyster Reefs Mangrove Plantings Measure Carried Forward �N)_ Y Y Y Discussion Best practice for stabilizing dunes and combating erosion. Native habitat to southwest Florida and can dampen wave energy to increase retention. Best practice for use with infrastructure protection. 11 rnative 1 - North Coun ALTERNATIVE 1 - BEACH ONLY IL Following the study authority, berm and dune features were evaluated along the full length of Collier County beaches Modeled from R1 (northern County line) to R89 (north side of Gordon Pass), and on Marco Island from R136-R148 Included berm widths from existing (-50') to 150 feet, and berm heights from existing (-4.5'avg.) to 10-14 feet Reach Name Extents R1-R9 Barefoot Beach Barefoot Beach Preserve R9-R16 Wiggins Pass State Park R17-R22 Vanderbilt Beach R22-R29 Pelican Bay R29-R41 Clam Pass Park R42-R46 Park Shore R46-R57 Naples Beach R58A-R79 Gordon Pass Reach R79-R89 South Marco Beach R135-R148 Cape Marco R148-G4 12 Marco Island rr,x_,.:: ii3� rus :;ti S1TUU41rtlI M�'{tSurk-1., Measure Type Onn.- K 16nrn - 11.. tvh OLYC WA,4k ahoba: H7prlilrrs - - DeSuki 11. Uar� �f Herdrj �Lunrr 2 - North Coup ALTERNATIVE 2 - BEACH + STRUCTURAL • Surge Barriers planned at Wiggins and Doctors Passes • Tide Gates studied in the Upper Gordon River, at Seagate Drive, and along Bonita Beach Road • Floodwalls accompany gates along Tamiami Trail, Bonita Beach Road, and Seagate Drive • Existing revetment being studied along Caxambas Pass • Reduces risk to approximately 30,000 structures Seagate Drive Floodwall and Tide Gate Doctors Pass Surge Barrier l . `'Alternative 1 a.. Structural Measures Measure Type ti ewod c:re � eea�n ti ZJ'' o�� AV M.I. Revetment 6 2 - Planninq Area 5 Tamiami Trail Floodwall and Tide Gates C.111er ALTERNATIVE 3 - BEACH + NONSTRUCTURAL • Structural planning areas (1, 3, 5) were alternatively analyzed for nonstructural solutions to determine which method was more efficient • Three additional areas (2, 4, 6) where structural solutions were not feasible were only evaluated for nonstructural solutions • Reduces risk for 6,000 structures evaluated for nonstructural measures ternative 3 - Forth Cou arco Island t-r Hardee Okeechobee: Kghiands Chariotlp �� r lae hem w my COINff 14 Structural Measures Measure Type Dunc & Berm Tavh Nnjj-Structural ALTERNATIVE 4 - COMBINATION • Same beach measures evaluated in Alternative 1 • Same structural measures evaluated in Alternative 2 (planning areas 1, 3, 5) tern-afi e 4 - North County. I-elet H;Idm 10shUb. Fwrbl& �cri�F� Ghda� L{4 Hen&Y i t=raM Cbkr r1m, • Nonstructural measures only considered in lanning areas 2, 4, 6 since structural '+ measures determined to be more efficient for.. planning areas 1, 3, 5) Marco Island • Reduces risk to 35,000 structures r hr • Critical Infrastructure examined for floodproofing (88 structures) SUMP"al wgaswu Ab%P -� T� r-rWhNH i a.—y. i tit%— CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE ff C.I. in 100YR Floodplain • 88 facilities • Naples- 57 • Marco Island- 17 • Isles of Capri- 2 • Everglades City- 9 • Ochopee- 3 Airport ❑ Communication Site Electric Substation Emergency Facility 0 Hazmat EHS Site School Goodland 0 Gordon River and Rock Creek 0 Isles of Capri 0 Marco Island 0 Naples Bay 0 cuter Clam Bay 0 venetian Bay 0 Wiggins Pass " -1F(, 4 + .�t a f 401 Q 100 Year- Floodplain =EPVA 2v1E I 4r --- or, ■1 r Measure Structural (S1) Nonstructural (NS) EVALUATION OF G2CRM RESULTS Planning Area 1 3 5 1 2 3 Modeled Areas arefoot Beach, Wiggins Pass, anderbilt Beach, Wiggins Pass tate Park ark Shore, Naples Beach, octors Pass, Naples Bay pper Gordon River Rock Creek arefoot Beach, Wiggins Pass, anderbilt Beach, Wiggins Pass tate Park lican Bay, Clam Pass rk Shore, Naples Beach, ctors Pass, Naples Bay aples Beach, Gordon Pass Total Average Total Average Net Benefit Annualized Cost Annual Benefits Remaining to Cost, ($) ($) Benefits ($) Ratio 12,500,000 27,000,000 15,000,000 2.2 3,000,000 18,000,000 15,000,000 5.9 79,000,000 10,000,000 44,000,000 243,000,000 pper Gordon River Rock Creek 86,000,000 les of Capri, Marco Island, 172,000,000 oodland 17 111 111 • • 111 111 : : 22,500,000 -56,500,000 0.3 7,000,000 -3,000,000 0.7 12,500,000 -31,000,000 0.3 79,000,000 1-164,000,000 0.3 78,000,000-8,000,000 0.9 398,000,000 226,000,000 2.3 } COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES Average Average Annual Net Alternative Alternative Name First Costs ($) Annual Benefits Annual Costs Remaining BCR Description (AAB) ($) (AAC) ($) Benefits ($) 0 No Action - - - - - - Beach Only (PAs 1, 3, 4) (12FT Dune/75FT 1 Berm) 890,000,000 14,000,000 51,000,000 -37,000,000 0.3 Beach Nourishment Planning Areas 1, 3, and 4 Beach Nourishment Planning Areas 1 and 3 and Structural 2 Al + Structural PAs 1, 3, 5 1,278,000,000 277,000,000 63,000,000 214,000,000 4.4 Measures in Planning Areas 1, 3, and 5 Al+ Nonstructural (PAs 2, 4, 6 + NS looks in Beach Nourishment Planning Areas 1, 3, and 4; Nonstructural 3 PAs 1, 3, 5) 4,973,000,000 158,000,000 224,000,000 -66,000,000 0.7 Measures Planning Areas 1-6 & Critical Infrastructure Beach Nourishment Planning Areas 1 and 3; Structural Al+ Combination (Structural and Measures in Planning Areas 1, 3, 5; and Nonstructural 4 Nonstructural) 5,937,000,000 422,000,000 236,000,000 185,000,000 1.8 Measures in Planning Areas 2, 4, 6 & Critical Infrastructure Beach Nourishment Planning Areas 1 and 3; Structural Measures in Planning Areas 1, 3, 5; and Nonstructural 4a A4 minus PA4 4,838,000,000 402,000,000 195,000,000 206,000,000 2.1 Measures in Planning Areas 2 and 6 & Critical Infrastructure Beach Nourishment Planning Areas 1 and 3; Structural Measures in Planning Areas 1, 3, 5; and Nonstructural Measures in Planning Areas 2, parts of 6 & Critical A4 PA2, MA30a, MA31 N, MA32a, MA39a 2,249,000,000 376,000,000 99,000,000 277,000,000 3.8 Infrastructure Beach Nourishment Planning Areas 1 and 3; Structural Measures in Planning Areas 1, 3, 5; and Nonstructural Measures in Planning Areas 2, parts of 6 & Critical A4 PA2, MA30a, MA31 N, MA32a 2,142,000,000 366,000,000 95,000,000 271,000,000 3.8 Infrastructure Beach Nourishment Planning Areas 1 and 3; Structural Measures in Planning Areas 1, 3, 5; and Nonstructural A4 (PA2, MA30a, MA31 N, MA32a, MA39a, Measures in Planning Areas 2, parts of 6 & Critical MA31WS) 4,106,000,000 397,000,000 168,000,000 229,000,000 2.4 Infrastructure B24h Nourishment Planning Areas 1 and 3; Structural A A - A n _._ 1_ A A A w w nn nnn nnn l'n nnn nnn nnn nnn A ^f Measures in Planning Areas 1, 3, 5; and Nonstructural R A - - _. 2 - North Coup ALTERNATIVE 2 - BEACH + STRUCTURAL • Surge Barriers planned at Wiggins and Doctors Passes • Tide Gates studied in the Upper Gordon River, at Seagate Drive, and along Bonita Beach Road • Floodwalls accompany gates along Tamiami Trail, Bonita Beach Road, and Seagate Drive • Existing revetment being studied along Caxambas Pass • Reduces risk for 30,000 structures Seagate Drive Floodwall and Tide Gate Doctors Pass Surge Barrier l . `'Alternative 1 a.. Structural Measures Measure Type ti ewod c:re � eea�n ti ZJ'' o�� AV M.I. Revetment 6 2 - Planninq Area 5 Tamiami Trail Floodwall and Tide Gates C.111er FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS • Due to the density of structures in the County and limited vacant land, it is assumed that most future development would be in the form of redevelopment, and the structure inventory in the study area will remain fairly consistent with the existing conditions • Collier County will continue to maintain three reaches of shoreline through a local renourishment program, however their financial capability to execute this program will diminish throughout the period of analysis • Vanderbilt Beach, R22-R30 (-1.50 miles) • Park Shore Beach, R42-54 (-2.25 miles) • Naples Beach, R58A-R79 (-4.00 miles) • Persistent erosion of the beach line will increase due to expected sea level rise for the area; future sea level rise estimates are incorporated into the study based on scientific estimates • SLC will increase the depth and extent of storm surge inundation, as well as increase potential for more frequent nuisance flooding and increase the depth of water during nuisance flood events 20 BEACH=FX MODELED SCENARIO ❑ North Beach Geographic Area • 9 Economic Reaches, 22 Modeled Reaches • Initial array of Existing, 50 year, and 100 year level dunes; 75, foot berms 125, and • Revised array of 100 year level, 12 ft., and 14 ft. dunes; 75 and 50 foot berms; 7 year and 5 year placement intervals ❑ Marco Island Geographic Area • 2 Economic Reaches, 7 Modeled Reaches • Array of Existing, 50 year, and 100 year level dunes; Minimum, Medium, and Maximum berms (berm widths vary by modeling reach) 21 TENTATIVELY SELECTED PLAN • Alternative 4 -Combination • Structural measures in planning areas 1,3, 5 • Nonstructural measures in planning areas 2 and 6 (planning area 4 if justified after optimization) • Beach Nourishment in areas supporting effectiveness of back bay structural measures; Reaches include R1-R29 (planning area 1) and R46—R68 (planning area 3) • Reduces risk for approximately 35,000 structures • Critical Infrastructure (88 structures) Reach Name Extents R1-R9 Barefoot Beach Barefoot Beach Preserve R9-R16 Wiggins Pass State Park R17-R22 Vanderbilt Beach R22-R29 Park Shore R46-R57 Naples Beach R58A-R68 TSP. North Cou ar-co Island till!{ MOM #!{Sh4 F�7ftildG ING GGS+J44 �cri�,F� Ghda� iLrfal it mrl! . 1oaJ ,.a SUP 7wnx r�,l Inq M Eti�rF SP - Plannin Area 1 Bonita Beach Rd N. Floodwall and Gates Wiggins Pass Surge Barrier Beach Dune and Berm Structural Measures Measure Type 7- TVTy� Pa Prsu.l.n \� ��•irJ� Structural pleasures MeasureType Type 7%P Type ONV Fk•_•i Chvr 0 i%xh V FL-41-11 w {Kr sLilr#1 ItRr.} Qrut�r.r�l T 4d Oww 1§ Itvrm sww 9areirF A Pump Scmiorr CTED PLAN SP - Plannin Area 3 Seagate Drive Floodwall and Gate Suuctu.1 Measures Measure Type TYPe T5P7ype .~y - TSP - Planning g Structure] Measures Measure Type Tyne TS?Tyne ti nwac.�e � eel .•y hme Solon Doctors Pass Surge Barrier Beach Dune and Berm Nonstructural 1 `: - TSP I-Pla;nninAmea 5 `. Structural Measures Measure Type -h'pe 75P']ype /y ibx-al r* Hnuts s-Io,. SP - Plannin sum..] Measures Meas Type Tyye Tf PType a�a naaaa..e - &xM1 Tamiami Trail Floodwall and Gates � •J /- runws.-.. A 23 -�'x Stw-k mmprre¢ r�r r� � a4d •�� iF�i EF+i PUBLIC USE 1. The Club at Barefoot Beach: R1.5-R9 — Private Beach (0.90 miles) ;L ?. Barefoot Beach Preserve: R14.5-R16 — Conservation Area Wo Access (0.32 mi.) i •. A Ir. L'% 1� - 3. Vanderbilt Beach: R24.5-R27.5 — Public Beach w/o Access (0.56 mi.) qb!r- _. Planni nq Area 3 1. Park Shore: R48-R50 — Public Beach w/o Access (0.41 mi.) 2. Naples: R57.5-R59.5 — Public Beach w/o Access (0.26 mi.) hx7r ra 1 Pw me:� rep fb%e rvtd G*1 1 + �� sod •�� r i 4�s�� • FEASIBILITY STUDY CRITICAL CONCERNS AND ISSUES FROM HERE ➢ Tentatively Selected Plan issued for public review on 7/31/2020 ➢ USACE will host zoom public workshops and in -person presentation to elected officials ➢ USACE to continue to refine TSP until $3M appropriation is exhausted ➢ Critical steps • Chief of Engineers Approval expected by 9/21(BCR>1.0) • Need congressional authorization for project • Need funding appropriation from congress - recently a result of major storms • Federal lobbying is critical to timely authorization and appropriation ➢ After authorization and funding appropriation • Project execution with Jax District (real development starts here) • Project development, engineering and scheduling of actual plan • Focus to get the beaches justified (BCR>l) by themselves -Top Priority and • Focus on Planning Areas 1 and 3. Beaches and Structural ➢ Concerns and potential land mines • Private property acquisition, perpetual easements, Barefoot Beach access • Cost Share funding sources/responsibilities and affordability • Environmental stakeholders and the Cities SMART Feasibility Study Process: Concurrent review SCOPING & PLANNING STRATEGY FCSA: 9 Oct 2018 ALTERNATIVE FORMULATION & ANALYSIS AIPW Tentatively Selected Plan (TSP) Milestone: 26 Mar 2020 Alternatives Milestone: 11 Jan 2019 STUDY MILESTONE SCHEDULE Tentatively Selected Plan Milestone (CW262) Release of Draft Study for Concurrent Reviews (CW250) Agency Decision Milestone (CW263) Submit Final Report Package to Vertical Team (CW160) Final Review Complete (CW170) Signed Chief's Report (CW270) 32 Milestone: October 2020 State and Agency Review: June 2021 Mar 2020 (S) May 2020 (S) Oct 2020 (S) Apr 2021 (S) Jun 2021 (S) Sept 2021 (S) DE transmits final report package Sep 2021 :l!'1 �:�!\:�:� I �: Sector Gate Open Sector Gate Closed MITER GATE BIRD'S EYE VIEW MITER TIDE GATE VI v �- A i� -OW!F 4 p I j-k GATE CLOSURE Fi re . Bird's ere view of a gate closure apart of the existing Norfolk Floodwall. kl, "-N Tt It W 41& , L RK r%O-rl O-PrIOPING (Temporary) Detail + Flood depths 3 feet or less 0 Structurally sound buildings 0 New design & construction 0 Retrofitting existing structures + o basement or crawl space Kermit, WV (Pizza Hut) 9D lk- I, - ELEVATION ON EXTENDED FOUNDATION ... is one of the most common and effective methods used t prevent flooding of living space... ...recommend design and construction by reputable/qualified professionals and contractors... ... Not permitted in regulatory flo d gray... Not recommended areas f high flood velocities ...Acceptable in Atones. L !r � F ._�� •T i � 7 �• i•r - PjL- . ro } r 1 L J 7 � T r■ LiL r•1.��17 C�f� - L ■ ti•d�•Fi 1 ref,-7'fi C, - I L w l d- OEM •L • art t ik, - _ '- N. L, - ■ et ` T L •r. A RELOCATING MASONRY BUILDINGS iq 41 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Community Services Department Regular Meeting Date: June 17, 2020 To: City Council From: Dana Souza, Community Service Director Date: June 1, 2020 Legislative ® Quasi -Judicial ❑ SUBJECT: A. A Resolution amending the FY 2019-20 budget adopted by Resolution 2019-14400, by appropriating $16,796.15 from the Beach Fund to the Capital Improvement 20R16 Naples Pier Corrosion Mitigation. B. Award of contract to Vetor Contracting Services, LLC of Naples, FL for the Naples Pier Corrosion Mitigation project in the amount of $151,796.15, which includes a City controlled contingency of $13,799.65 (Bid 20-037). SUMMARY: City Council is asked to: A. Approve Resolution amending the FY2019-20 budget by Resolution 2019-14400, by appropriating $16,796.15 from the Beach Fund to the Capital Improvement 20R16 Naples Pier corrosion Mitigation. B. Award a contract to Vetor Contracting Services, LLC of Naples, FL, for the Naples Pier Corrosion Mitigation project in the amount of $151,796.15, which includes a City controlled contingency of $13,799.65 (10% of bid). (Contractor Bid $137,996.50 + 10% Contingency $13,799.65 = $151,796.15.) The contractor will complete concrete piling repairs which include the installation of eighty-eight linear feet of galvanic jackets (lifejackets) at ten (10) pilings. BACKGROUND: In August 2018, the City contracted Turrell, Hall & Associates (Engineer) to conduct a visual inspection of the Naples Pier concrete piles and assess the level of steel corrosion and piling integrity. Based on the study, the Engineer developed plans and bid documents to mitigate the Pier corrosion discovered during the 2018 inspection. The Engineer's report, which includes photos of the piling corrosion, is included in the agenda packet. Josh Maxwell, PE from Turrell, Hall & Associates will attend the City Council meeting to answer any questions concerning the project repairs. In the FY 2019-20 budget, City Council approved $135,000.00 in CIP 20R16 for the Naples Pier corrosion mitigation project. The funding approved in FY20 was intended to be the first phase of the project. Staff requested an additional $165,000.00 in the FY21 budget in Page 2 June 18, 2020 anticipation of Phase 2 repairs. The repairs will extend the life cycle of the pier pilings and mitigate corrosion. The City advertised for bids (Bid 20-037) on April 21, 2020. The full scope of the project was bid. Again, staff anticipated the need to fund the project in two phases over two fiscal years. Bids were opened on May 21, 2020, and the lowest qualified bidder, Vetor Contracting Services, submitted a bid in the amount of $137,996.50. Staff is requesting an appropriation of $16,796.15 so all the work can be completed in one phase. The Department will eliminate its request for $165,000.00 in the FY21 budget for this project (Beach Fund). Bidding Process Thirty (30) city registered vendors were sent information regarding ITB No. 20-037 which was advertised in the Naples Daily News on April 21, 2020 and posted on the City's web site. A public notice was also posted with the City Clerk's Office. Demand Star notified 158 potential vendors and 15 plan holders. Supplemental vendors were also sent information on the project included 293 Collier, Lee, and Charlotte County registered minority business enterprises, and 50 HUD Section 3 Collier County registered businesses. The Purchasing Division concurs with Community Service Department staff and Engineer of Record Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. recommendation indicating Vetor Contracting Services, LLC (EIN: 30-0818740) as the low responsive bidder with a Project Total of $137,996.50. Vetor Contracting Services, LLC non -technical elements of their submission were not deficient in any manner. The company's bid submission was found responsive, and the below data on the company indicates an acceptable level of responsibility. The firm is not currently a City registered vendor and will need to register in the city's system prior to contract execution. The firm has been verified as active in the Florida's Division of Corporations database. Vetor Contracting Services, LLC has a current Certified General Contractor license # (CGC1523966) registered with the State of Florida. A check of the firm's references found no negative findings or areas of concern. If the contract is approved by City Council, the contractor will begin work after the Notice To Proceed (NTP) has been issued and the contract requires the work to be completed within 120 days from the date of the NTP with Final Completion no later than 30 days from Substantial completion. What is a Galvanic Jacket? A galvanic jacket, also referred to as a `lifejacket' is a protection system for concrete piling systems that are exposed to corrosive conditions. The protection system utilizes a zinc mesh anode placed directly against the inside face of a stay -in -place fiberglass form. The system is proven to stop corrosion by providing an electrical current to the affected region of the piling. This current is produced through a galvanic process and thus, does not require a remote power supply. This project will install 88 linear feet of galvanic jacket at ten (10) pilings on the Pier. Photos of galvanic jackets are included below. Page 3 June 18, 2020 Mr. Maxwell, PE from Turrell, Hall & Associates will be available to answer technical questions concerning the galvanic jackets. How will this project impact the public use of the Pier? The Pier will be open to the public while the contractor is completing the required work for this project. The contractor will use an area at the entrance of the Pier as their staging area. A minimal amount of materials will be stored in this area. Most of the repairs to the concrete pilings will be completed from a barge. The barge will be visible to the public from the beach and the Pier. The barge work will interrupt visitor fishing; however, the barge will be moving from piling to piling which means there will always be a section of the Pier where patrons can fish without interference from the contractor. The galvanic jackets will be installed at 10 pilings (Bent #'s 35, 34, 22, 21, 19, 13, 10, 9) as shown below. The work at Bent #'s 19-35 (7) will be completed from a barge and the work at Bent #'s 9-13 (3) will be completed from the beach. When work is completed from the beach, the contractor will use caution tape to prevent the public from entering the work area. The site will be cleaned daily by the contractor. A full copy of the plan below is included in the packet. I�Bent Numbers'. W . - „-, . '-------------- a W Q VLL eeo a - tl 3 li Il ------- ---- - -- d > = _ - ZD _�N�s�oNs Galvanic Jacket Locations (Blue) nil I I i Page 4 June 18, 2020 FUNDING SOURCE: Funding, in the amount of $135,000 is available in CIP Project 20R16. An appropriation from the Beach Fund in the amount of $16,796.15 is required to fund the project at $151,796.15. MASTER PLAN/CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT: Vision Plan: This project serves to meet the following goals from the adopted 2007 Vision Plan: 1. Preserve the Town's distinctive character and culture — Core Goal Capital Improvement Project: This project is funded in the FY20 CIP. RECOMMENDED ACTION: A. Approve a Resolution amending the FY2019-20 budget by Resolution 2019-14400, by appropriating $16,796.15 from the Beach Fund to the Capital Improvement 20R16 Naples Pier Corrosion Mitigation. B. Award a contract to Vetor Contracting Services, LLC of Naples, FL, for the Naples Pier Corrosion mitigation project— Pier piling repairs and life jacket installation in the amount of $151,796.15, which includes a City controlled contingency of $13,799.65 and authorize the City Manager to sign the contract with Vetor Contracting Services, LLC. PL & e°a�y`1F' GULF dee 0 ?;e- /C�04 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE (239) 213-7120 . FACSIMILE (239) 213-7130 280 RIVERSIDE CIRCLE * NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102-6796 July 7, 2020 Gary McAlpin, Coastal Management Section 2685 S. Horseshoe Dr. Unit 103 Naples, FL 34104 Sent via email Gary, The City of Naples submitted a FY21 TDC funding request for the Naples Pier Corrosion Mitigation Project in the amount of $135,600. The funding requested was for Phase 2 of what the City thought would require two phases of repairs based on the engineers cost estimates. The original plan was to do Phase I of the corrosion mitigation on the Pier pilings in FY20 at an estimated cost of $135,000, and Phase II to be completed in FY21 with an estimated cost of $165,000. The total project cost was estimated at $300,000. In August 2018, the City contracted Turrell, Hall & Associates (Engineer) to conduct a visual inspection of the Naples Pier concrete piles and assess the level of steel corrosion and piling integrity. Based on the study, the Engineer developed plans and bid documents to mitigate the Pier corrosion discovered during the 2018 inspection. The cost for this work was $30,000.00. The City bid the project on April 21, 2020. The entire scope of the project was bid. The City still anticipated two phases would be required and included costs for mobilization and demobilization for both phases in the bid schedule. Bids were opened on May 21, 2020. Seven (7) bids were received with the costs for the full project ranging between $137,996.50 and $829,275. City staff was surprised to see the low bidder, Vetor Contracting Services (Contractor), could complete both phases of the project in one phase and for the cost of $137,996,50. The City's Engineer spoke with the Contractor to ensure they fully understood the scope and schedule. The Engineer also checked the Contractor's qualifications and references and all reports were positive. On June 17, 2020, the Naples City Council awarded a contract to Vetor Contracting Services, LLC of Naples, FL, for the Naples Pier Corrosion Mitigation project in the amount of $151,796.15, which includes a City controlled contingency of $13,799.65 (10% of bid). (Contractor Bid $137,996.50 + 10% Contingency $13,799.65 = $151,796.15.) The contractor will complete concrete piling repairs which include the installation of eighty-eight linear feet of galvanic jackets (lifejackets) at ten (10) pilings. The City's total project costs, including the Engineers costs for design and construction administration are shown below. Project Costs: $ 30,000.00 = Turrell and Hall Consultation, Report, Bid Docs, etc. $151,796.15 = Vetor Contracting Services Project Bid $ 34,885.00 = Turrell and Hall Consultation, Construction Adm. & Inspection $216,681.15 = Total Project Cost (includes $13,799.65 of contingency) Since the project is able to be completed in 1 Phase, the City is requesting Collier County's approval to pre -spend against the City's FY21 Grant Request of $135,600 as the City will complete all of the work in FY20 instead of in two phases of work completed in two fiscal years. This means, if approved, the City will complete the project before in FY20 and will request reimbursement of $135,600 in FY21. The City believes it is advantageous to complete this project in its entirety during summer 2020 so the work is completed before we experience an influx of seasonal residents. I have attached copies of the City's bid analysis, which includes the project bid tabulations, for your records. As you know, the City also spends $75,000 to $100,000 each year to manage and maintain the Naples Pier which attracts over 1 million visitors each year. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Best wishes, Dana A. Souza Director 2