Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agenda 07/14/2020 Item #17B (Resolution - Petition PL20180003708/CP-2019-02 for Temple Shalom)
17.B 07/14/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve by Resolution the single petition for Temple Shalom within the 2019 Cycle 2 of Growth Management Plan Amendments for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for review and Comments response for an amendment specific to the Estates- Mixed Use District of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. (Transmittal Hearing) [PL20180003708/CP-2019-02] OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve the single petition in the 2019 Cycle 2 of amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies. CONSIDERATIONS: • Chapter 163, F.S., provides for an amendment process for a local government's adopted Comprehensive Plan. • Collier County Resolution No. 12-234 provides for a public petition process to amend the GMP. • The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), sitting as the "local planning agency" under Chapter 163.3174, F.S., held their Transmittal hearing for the 2019 Cycle 2 petition on June 11, 2020 (one petition only, PL20180003708/CP-2019-02). • This Transmittal hearing for the 2019 Cycle 2 considers an amendment to the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan. The GMP amendment requested is specific to the creation of a new subdistrict, Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict in the Estates designation, Estates Mixed -Use District, of the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element and is approximately 13.53 acres, and is located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road (CR 896), +3/a mile west of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East (Urban Estates Planning Community). The currently existing Temple Shalom is already approved for approximately a 302-seat temple and a childcare/pre-school for approximately 70 children and has been operating for over 20 years at this location. Homeless shelters and soup kitchens are prohibited, and the site must be rezoned to a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) to permit the uses in this subdistrict. This petition seeks to amend the GMP, adopted by Ordinance No. 2019-23, as amended, specifically amending the Golden Gate Area Master Plan by: Adding text to the Estates -Mixed - Use District to create a new subdistrict, Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict, to allow development of the site with "church and religious organization services and activities, childcare/pre-school center, religious teaching, and related religious philanthropic and community services and events." Church sanctuary facilities are limited to a maximum of 302 seats [existing 302-seat temple]; childcare/preschool is limited to a maximum of 200 children at any one time [existing use has 70 children]; a maximum of 22,000 square feet of floor area of non -church and non -pre-school uses on the westerly portion of the site [undeveloped and wooded]. The proposed 22,000 square feet on Tract 64 will be used to house the Jewish Packet Pg. 3200 17.B 07/14/2020 Federation of Greater Naples; they have out -grown their current location. This amendment will include an amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and a new subdistrict map. [a companion PUD rezone petition PL20180003710 will be heard at the adoption hearing.] The proposed amended Subdistrict text, as recommended by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), is depicted in the Resolution, Exhibit "A." Based on the review of this large-scale GMP amendment petition, including the supporting data and analysis, staff makes the following findings and conclusions. • The need for the proposed new uses is reasonably demonstrated. • The subject site is reasonably central to the geographical area of the population served. • It is reasonable and logical to locate the new uses, which are complimentary to the existing uses, at this site. • The Jewish Temple and childcare uses have operated at the subject site for 20+ years and are believed to have been good neighbors/compatible with surrounding land uses (all single family residential). • The proposed uses are considered community facility uses and institutional uses, not commercial uses. There are no infrastructure impacts related concerns. • There are no unacceptable adverse impacts to environmental or cultural resources on the site. • The proposed new uses are generally compatible with the surrounding area based upon the macro level at which GMP amendments are reviewed. The data and analysis provided for the amendment generally supports the proposed changes to the Urban Golden Gate Estates SubElement of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The complete staff analysis of this petition is provided in the CCPC Staff Report. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts to Collier County result from this amendment, as this approval is for the Transmittal of this proposed amendment. Petition fees account for staff review time and materials, and for the cost of associated legal advertising/public notice for the public hearings. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of the proposed amendment by the Board for Transmittal and its submission to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies will commence the Department's thirty (30) day review process and ultimately return the amendment to the CCPC and the Board for Adoption hearings tentatively to be held in the Fall of 2020. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment is authorized by, and subject to the procedures established in, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, The Community Planning Act, and by Collier County Resolution No. 12-234, as amended. The Board should consider the following criteria in making its decision: "plan amendments shall be based on relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an Packet Pg. 3201 17.B 07/14/2020 appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue." 163.3177(1)(f), FS This item is approved as to form and legality. It requires a majority for approval because this is a Transmittal hearing of the GMP amendment. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: That the CCPC forward petition PL20180003708/CP-2019-02 to the Board with a recommendation of approval to transmit. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition at their June 11, 2020 meeting after continuing from March 19, 2020 meetings. The Planning Commission voted 6/0 to forward the subject petition to the Board with a recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies, per the staff recommendation. There were two registered public speakers, Doug Loewer and Bev Loewer. Bev Loewer ceded her 3 minutes to her husband. He stated that the Temple Shalom has been a good neighbor, they live directly next to the Temple's property to the west. He also stated that they do not oppose the project, but voiced several concerns over the following: sewage treatment, the adequacy of shared parking, and the handling of storm water. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION: That the BCC approve petition PL20180003708/CP-2019-02 for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, and other statutorily required agencies, for review. [Staff reminder: This GMP amendment follows the Expedited State Review process. Chapter 163.3184 (3)(c)l, Florida Statutes, provides that the County Board (local governing body) shall hold its Adoption (second public) hearing within 180 days after receipt of agency comments, unless extended by agreement with notice to the DEO (state land planning agency) and any affected person that provided comments on the amendment.] Prepared by: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section, and Anita Jenkins, AICP, Community Planning Manager, Community Planning Section, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) Trans. Staff Rpt CP-2019-2_FINAL (PDF) 2. [Linked] Transmittal Application -Petition -Temple Shalom (PDF) 3. Transmittal Resolution - 061220(PDF) 4. BCC Affidavit & Advertisement 12096 (PDF) 5. Temple Shalom letters of support (PDF) 6. Temple Shalom letters of opposition (PDF) 7. Waiver for Hybrid Quasi -Judicial Hearing CBB07-08-2020 Signed (PDF) Packet Pg. 3202 17.B 07/14/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.B Doe ID: 12096 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve the single petition for Temple Shalom within the 2019 Cycle 2 of Growth Management Plan Amendments for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for review and Comments response for an amendment specific to the Estates - Mixed Use District of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. (Transmittal Hearing) [PL20180003708/CP- 2019-02] Meeting Date: 07/14/2020 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Senior — Zoning Name: Marcia R Kendall 06/12/2020 8:46 AM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning — Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 06/12/2020 8:46 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Zoning Growth Management Department Growth Management Department County Attorney's Office County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget Office of Management and Budget County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Judy Puig Level 1 Reviewer Anita Jenkins Additional Reviewer James C French Deputy Department Head Review Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending Completed 06/12/2020 11:00 AM Completed 06/18/2020 2:45 PM Completed 06/19/2020 10:05 AM Completed 06/22/2020 9:09 AM Completed 06/25/2020 10:15 AM Completed 06/25/2020 10:50 AM Completed 06/25/2020 12:47 PM Completed 06/28/2020 7:50 PM Completed 07/05/2020 8:26 PM 07/14/2020 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 3203 Agenda item 9. 17.B.a Go�ier CouHty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: June 4, 2020 (Continued from: March 19, 2020) RE: PETITION PL20180003708/CP-2019-2, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] AGENT/APPLICANT/OWNER Agents: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Applicant & Owner: Ms. Debra Antzis, President Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Temple Shalom, Inc. 3800 Via Del Rey 4630 Pine Ridge Road Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Naples, FL 34116 Richard Yovanovich Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. The Northern Trust Bldg., 4001 Tamiami Trail N., Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, comprising ±13.5 acres, is located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road (CR 896), ±3/4 mile west of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, within the Urban Estates Planning Community. (see location map below, and aerial map on following page with subject site in blue brackets) N Pine Ridge RD J J CO m � y Project Location U Green BLVD e Packet Pg. 3204 17.B.a Agenda item 9. REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant proposes a large-scale Growth Management Plan amendment to the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element (UGGE) text and Future Land Use Map of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), specifically to establish the new Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict, by: 1) Amending Policy 1.1.4A. Estates Designation, Estates Mixed Use District, to add the Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict; 2) Amending the Estates Mixed Use District to add the new Subdistrict provisions; 3) Amending the UGGE Future Land Use Map Series listing to add the title of the new Subdistrict map; and 4) Amending the UGGE Future Land Use Map to depict the new Subdistrict and adding a new Future Land Use Map Series inset map that depicts the new Subdistrict. The proposed amended/added text and maps are depicted on Resolution Exhibit A's. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is requesting this change to allow development of the site with "church and religious organization services and activities, childcare/pre-school center, religious teaching, and related religious philanthropic and community services and events." Church sanctuary facilities are limited to a maximum of 302 seats [existing 302-seat temple]; childcare/preschool is limited to a maximum of 200 children at any one time [existing use has 70 children]; a maximum of 22,000 square feet of floor area of non -church and non -pre-school uses on the westerly portion of the site [undeveloped and wooded]. Homeless shelters and soup kitchens are prohibited, and the site must be rezoned to a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) to permit the uses in this subdistrict [there is a companion PUD rezone petition PL20180003710 that will be heard at the adoption hearing]. SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: Subject Property: The subject ±13.57-acre site is comprised of three platted tracts (one tax parcel), oriented east to west: Tracts 68, 65 and 64, Golden Gate Estates Unit 26, less right-of-way. Tracts 68 and 65 are developed (302-seat temple and related religious uses and childcare/pre-school with 70 children) Packet Pg. 3205 17.B.a Agenda item 9. and Tract 64 is undeveloped and wooded. The entire site is zoned E, Estates, with conditional uses for church and childcare on Tracts 68 and 65 only; and, it is designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. Surrounding Lands: North: Across Pine Ridge Road, a four -lane divided arterial road, single family dwellings on lands zoned "E" and designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. East: A single family dwelling on land zoned "E" and designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. Further east are single family dwellings. South: Single family dwellings on lands zoned "E" and designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. West: A single family dwelling on land zoned "E" and designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. Further east are single family dwellings. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Prior to adoption of the GGAMP in 1991, which has locational criteria for conditional uses (CU) in the "E" zoning district — which the subject site does not meet, a provisional use (predecessor to CU) was approved for a church use on Tracts 68 and 65. Subsequent to adoption of the GGAMP, a CU was approved on the same site for childcare use (1993); this approval was based on an interpretation that a related CU (in this case, childcare integrally related to the temple use) could be approved without need to comply with the GGAMP CU locational criteria. Both uses have been in operation for 20+ years. Under that same interpretation, the CU for childcare could be amended to increase the number of children allowed without need for a GMP amendment. However, the petitioner desires to remove the grandfathered status of the two CUs, allow for the new uses that are separate but complementary (to be operated by the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples), and to establish (through the CFPUD) a unified plan of development for the entire site. There are no other approved non-residential uses in close proximity to the site; the closest is the Brooks Commercial PUD approximately '/2 mile to the east at the Pine Ridge Road/Collier Blvd. intersection. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy This Restudy was conducted at a high level, viewing large areas and major issues, not a parcel by parcel review. The Restudy -based GMP amendments were adopted in 2019 and did not change the future land use designation, nor add or revise policies pertaining to uses, affecting any properties in Golden Gate Estates in the vicinity of this site. The subject site is proposed to retain the 302-seat temple and associated uses, expand the childcare from 70 to 200 children, and add complementary philanthropic uses, services and events. Some of the uses in the proposed subdistrict are permitted as CUs in residential and agricultural zoning districts "E" and A, Rural Agricultural), some are permitted in commercial zoning districts and some are permitted in the CF, Community Facility zoning district. All of these uses are considered community facility and institutional uses, not commercial uses, though they may exhibit some commercial characteristics. The CF district states, in part, "These uses can be characterized as public facilities, institutional uses, open space uses, water -related or dependent uses, and other such uses generally serving the public at large." CF uses permitted by right include: child care centers; churches; civic and cultural facilities; assisted living facilities (ALF); parks and open space uses; educational facilities (private and parochial schools, colleges and universities); libraries. CF uses permitted by conditional use include: community centers; private clubs; public swimming pools; tennis facilities. The church and childcare uses are explicitly permitted in the CF district and the Packet Pg. 3206 17.B.a Agenda item 9. other proposed uses have similar characteristics as some combination of the permitted CF uses, perhaps community center/private club/church/cultural facilities. The submitted data and analysis includes the "2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study." Based on the large geographical area served, staff finds that the proposed location may be considered centrally located. Staff determined it not necessary to demonstrate a need for the church and childcare uses as they are not dependent upon this GMP amendment petition. In staff's opinion, the statutory requirements for a GMP amendment, below and continuing to next page, can be summarized as: 1) whether there is a demonstrated need for the land use change/the use(s) proposed; and 2) whether this is the appropriate location to fulfill that need. Staff concurs with the petitioner that the submitted data and analysis does reasonably demonstrate o that there is a need. As to the appropriateness of location, staff has identified no infrastructure impacts that result in a lowering of the adopted level of service standard for any affected public U) infrastructure and has identified no natural or cultural resource impact concerns. The subject site is Q. located reasonably proximate to the persons it will serve given the broad service area. Based upon E the surrounding development, presumed compatibility of the existing uses given their many years of W operation at this location, off-peak time traffic impacts for some uses, the project location on an arterial road, operational characteristics of a typical church and childcare use, and presumed impacts N of the new uses, staff is of the opinion that the proposed uses will be generally compatible with the surrounding area (at the high level at which GMP amendments are reviewed for compatibility) and Q that this is an appropriate location to provide the needed uses. Staff also finds it reasonable and Z logical to locate the new uses, which are complimentary to the existing uses, at this site The specific U- compatibility review is deferred to Zoning Services Section staff as part of the detailed review of the o companion PUD rezone petition where specific compatibility measures are appropriately considered. en Criteria for GMP Amendments in Florida Statutes Data and analysis requirements for comprehensive plans and plan amendments are noted in Chapter 163, F.S., specifically as listed below. Section 163.3177(1)(f), Florida Statutes: (f) All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. 1. Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, data, and supporting documents for proposed plans and plan amendments shall be made available for public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. Support data or summaries are not subject to the compliance review process, but the comprehensive plan must be clearly based on appropriate data. Support data or summaries may be used to aid in the determination of compliance and consistency. 2. Data must be taken from professionally accepted sources. The application of a methodology utilized in data collection or whether a particular methodology is professionally accepted may be evaluated. However, the evaluation may not include whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Original data collection by local governments is not required. However, local governments may use original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. Packet Pg. 3207 17.B.a Agenda item 9. 3. The comprehensive plan shall be based upon permanent and seasonal population estimates and projections, which shall either be those published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research or generated by the local government based upon a professionally acceptable methodology. The plan must be based on at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections as published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10-year planning period unless otherwise limited under s. 380.05, including related rules of the Administration Commission. Absent physical limitations on population growth, population projections for each municipality, and the unincorporated area within a county must, at a minimum, be reflective of each area's proportional share of the total county population and the total county population growth. Section 163.3177(6)(a)2.: 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: [emphasis added] a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. E b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. co d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. a e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of d nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. co g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent N with s. 333.02. v h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and z diversify the community's economy. LL j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. i Section 163.3177(6)(a)8., Florida Statutes: (a) A future land use plan element designating proposed future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public facilities, and other categories of the public and private uses of land. The approximate acreage and the general range of density or intensity of use shall be provided for the gross land area included in each existing land use category. The element shall establish the long-term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. Also, the state land planning agency has historically recognized the consideration of community desires (e.g. if the community has an articulated vision for an area as to the type of development desired, such as within a Community Redevelopment Area), and existing incompatibilities (e.g. presently allowed uses would be incompatible with surrounding uses and conditions). NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) NOTES: A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) required by LDC Section 10.03.05 F was held on October 30, 2019, 5:30 p.m. at the Temple Shalom, located at 4630 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34116. This NIM was advertised, noticed and held jointly for this small scale GMP amendment petition and companion PUD rezone petition. Packet Pg. 3208 Agenda item 9. 17.B.a The applicant team gave a presentation and responded to questions and comments. Less than ten members of the public attended besides members of the petitioner's team and County staff. Five members of the public spoke; beyond asking questions/seeking more information, the following concerns were expressed and issues raised: access safety on/off Pine Ridge Road; traffic impacts; traffic safety regarding those exiting the site heading east then making a U-turn to head west; adequacy of parking; adequacy of septic system so as to avoid contamination of adjacent property wells. The NIM minutes or notes, prepared by the applicant team, are included in the petition package. The meeting was ended at approximately 6:40 pm. [synopsis prepared by David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: • The need for the proposed new uses is reasonably demonstrated. • The subject site is reasonably central to the geographical area of the population served. • It is reasonable and logical to locate the new uses, which are complimentary to the existing uses, at this site. • The Jewish Temple and childcare uses have operated at the subject site for 20+ years and are believed to have been good neighbors/compatible with surrounding land uses (all single family residential). • The proposed uses are considered community facility uses and institutional uses, not commercial uses. • There are no infrastructure impacts related concerns. • There are no unacceptable adverse impacts to environmental or cultural resources on the site. • The proposed new uses are generally compatible with the surrounding area based upon the macro level at which GMP amendments are reviewed. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney's Office on March 2, 2020. (HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PL20180003708/CP-2019-2 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] Packet Pg. 3209 Agenda item 9. 17.B.a PREPARED BY: — '&'-1 SUE FAULKNER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER APPROVED BY: - ITiAJENKINS, C MMUITY PLANNING MGa- APPROVED BY: r' - JAhAES ER�fVCN, pEPU'r'Y pEPRRTM1rtENT HEAP GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Pelilion Number: PL201800037061CP-209-2 Staff Report for March 19. 2020 CCPC meeting DATE: DATE: 1 1- —7o2.1� E O fC t to N Q. E N d� DATE; -� ` t— NOTE, This petition has been tentatively scheduled for the April 14. 2020 BCC meeting- 1 Petition Number: PL20180003708/CP-2019-2 Staff Report for March 19, 2020 CCPC meeting NOTE: This petition has been tentatively scheduled for the April 14, 2020 BCC meeting. Trans. SRpt CP-2019-2zzTmpSh G:ICDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATA1Comp Plan Amendments12019 Cycles and Smalls12019 Cycle 2 - June1CP-19-2 Temple Shalom\CCPC saf 3-2-2020 m O O N Packet Pg. 3210 Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Application and Supporting Documents March 19, 2020 CCPC Hearing ® GradyMinor Civf] Fngfneem • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects June 26, 2019 Mr. David Weeks Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Division/ Planning and Regulation Land Development Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708), Submittal 1 Dear Mr. Weeks: A Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) application for properties located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 0.6± miles west of Collier Boulevard is being filed electronically for review. This application proposes to create a new subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Element to allow up to 22,000 square feet of building for religious and social organization uses, a church and maximum 200 student pre-school/day care uses in the subdistrict. Temple Shalom owns all property within this subdistrict; however, under the current GGAMP, the Temple cannot expand and develop approximately 4 acres of their property originally intended for development by the Temple. The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples, is an umbrella non-profit organization that provides financial, social and religious support to the Temple and other Jewish and non -denominational organizations in Collier County and intends to partner with the Temple in developing the undeveloped portion of the site with facilities that will fulfill their mutual interests. The GMPA is supported with a companion PUD rezone, which establishes the specific development standards for the proposed uses, and a Master Plan for development of the 13.5± acre property. Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Mr. David Weeks RE: Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708), Submittal 1 June 26, 2019 Page 2 of 2 Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Temple Shalom Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Clay Brooker, Cheffy Passidomo Richard D. Yovanovich GradyMinor File APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATOIN NUMBER: PL20180003708 DATE RECEIVED: PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE: September 27, 2018 DATE SUFFICIENT: This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252- 2400. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 as amended by Resolution 98-18 (both attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant Debra Antzis, President Company Temple Shalom, Inc. Address 4630 Pine Ridge Road City Naples State FL Zip Code 34116 Phone Number (239)455-3030 Email Address info@naplestemple.org Name of Agent * D. Wayne Arnold, AICP • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. Address 3800 Via Del Rey City Bonita Springs State Florida Zip Code 34134 Phone Number 239-947-1 144 Fax Number Bl I. Name of Agent * Richard D. Yovanovich • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. Address The Northern Trust Building, 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 C. Name of Owner (s) of Record Temple Shalom, Inc. Address 4630 Pine Ridge Road City Naples State FL Zip Code 34116 Phone Number (239)455-3030 Email Address info@naplestemple.org D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. See Exhibit I.D. II. Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Not Applicable B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock Temple Shalom, Inc. 100 A Florida Not For Profit Corporation C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest Not Applicable D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Not Applicable E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Not Applicable Date of Contract: F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address Not Applicable G. Date subject property acquired (12/12/1990) IeGsea( )�_Te a e€IeG.se_yrs., m^s. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: Not Applicable and date option terminates: Not Applicable, or anticipated closing: Not Applicable. H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION See Exhibit III.A B. GENERAL LOCATION South side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 0.6± miles west of Collier Boulevard C. PLANNING COMMUNITY Urban Estates D. TAZ 191 E. SIZE IN ACRES 13.5± F. ZONING E, Estates G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN Residential H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S) Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Traffic Circulation Sub -Element Aviation Sub -Element Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Solid Waste Sub -Element Capital Improvement Element Future Land Use Element Immokalee Master Plan Recreation/Open Space Mass Transit Sub -Element Potable Water Sub -Element NGWAR Sub -Element Drainage Sub -Element CCME Element X Golden Gate Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE (S) Beginning Page 30 OF THE Golden Gate Area Master Plan ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike -+ ,Tto identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: See Exhibit IV.B C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM Not applicable TO Not applicable D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map See Exhibit IV.D. DESCRIBE ADDITINAL CHANGES REQUESTED: _ Create Naoles Senior Center Communitv Fac Subdistrict Inset Mao. See Exhibit IV.E. V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I"=400'. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exhibit V.A. Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Exhibit V.A. Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Exhibit V.A. Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION Exhibit V.B. Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exhibit V.C. Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT- FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. Exhibit V.C. Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.),Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference F.A.C. Chapter 163-3177 and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). 1. INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J-1 1.006(1) (a) (5), F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.a, F.A.C.) N/N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1) (c), F.S. ? (Reference 9J-1 1.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County -wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. 11 Y, Exhibit V.D. Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference Rule 9J-5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J-1 1.007, F.A.C.) E. PUBLIC FACILITIES l . Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exhibit V.E. Potable Water Exhibit V.E. Sanitary Sewer Exhibit V.E.1 Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS Pine Ridge Road Collier Boulevard Exhibit V.E. Drainage Exhibit V.E. Solid Waste Exhibit V.E. Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Exhibit V.E. Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. Exhibit V.E. Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: Exhibit V.F Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). N.A. Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) N.A. Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable N.A. Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable N.A. High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION N.A. $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Provided $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Exhibit V.G.3 Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Exhibit V.G.4 Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) Submitted Electronically 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 25 copies of the complete application will be required. * If you have held a pre -application meeting and paid the pre -application fee of $250.00 at the meeting, deduct that amount from the above application fee amount when submitting your application. All pre -application fees are included in the total application submittal fee. Otherwise the overage will be applied to future proportionate share advertising costs. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1 "=400' or at a scale as determined during the pre -application meeting. LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN I hereby authorize Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. and Yovanovich, Coleman & Koester, P.A. (Name of Agent) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in this Application. Signed: Date: Debra Antzis as President of Temple Shalom, Inc. I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Applicant Debra Antzis as President of Temple Shalom, Inc. STATE OF COUNTY OF Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of 2019 Notary Public CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, who has produced and did take an Oath did not take and Oath MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: as identification NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 - False Official Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of %500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term." Temple Shalom Small -Scale Plan Amendment (PL20180003708) Exhibit I.D. Professional Consultants Planning/Project Management: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 239.947.1144 239.947.0375 fax warnold@gradyminor.com Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 239.435.3535 239.435.1218 fax rovanovich@cyklawfirm.com Transportation: James M. Banks, P.E., President JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. 4711 711 Avenue SW Naples, FL 34119 239.919.2767 jmbswte@msn.com Environmental: Marco A. Espinar — Biologist, President Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3880 Estey Avenue Naples, Florida 34104 May 14, 2019 w GradyMinor Page 1 of 1 JFGNA-18 Exhibit ID. docx Civil Engineers • Land SurMrors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 - 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com - www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Small -Scale Plan Amendment (PL2O18O0037O8) Exhibit III.A Legal Description TRACT 64, LESS THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF; TRACT 65, LESS THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF; TRACT 68, LESS THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF; GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 26, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 15 AND 16, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. August 26, 2019 w GradyMinor Page 1 of 1 JFGNA-18 Exhibit IIIA-rev1.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 - 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com - www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit W.B. Amendment Language Revise the GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Goals, Objectives and Policies B. Land Use Designation Description Section 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION A. Estates — Mixed Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 5. Temple Shalom Center Community Facility Subdistrict B. Estates — Commercial District 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict 1 15 C. List Of Maps 19 Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road (CR 896) — Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Center Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions Special Exceptions to Conditional Use in Golden Gate Estates December 18, 2019 W GradyA4inor Page 1 of 3 JFGNA-18 Exhibit IVB Proposed GMP Language-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Ft, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL2O18O0O37O8) Exhibit W.B. Amendment Language Temole Shalom Center Communitv Facilitv Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.1.4: [page 11 The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: F-AW*II F-AIX.=LTA IE ;Ilaill991F--1101411 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 5. Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict B. ESTATES - COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** A. Estates - Mixed Use District *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** 5. Temale Shalom Communitv Facilitv Subdistrict The subdistrict consists of 13.5+/- acres and is located on the south side of Pine RiclRe Road approximately % mile west of Collier Boulevard. It is comprised of Tracts 64, 65 and 68, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 26, less right of way. The purpose of the subdistrict is to allow for a campus of communitv facilitv uses as orovided for below. Develoament within the Subdistrict shall be subiect to the followini=_: December 18, 2019 W GradyMinor Page 2 of 3 JFGNA-18 Exhibit IVB Proposed GMP Language-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Fl, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.grad,minor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL2O18O0O37O8) Exhibit W.B. Amendment Language a. The Subdistrict shall be rezoned to a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD), which shall specify permitted uses. b. Allowable uses are church and religious organization services and activities, childcare/pre-school center, religious teaching, and related religious philanthropic and communitv services and events c. Tract 64 is limited to non -church and non -pre-school uses and a maximum of 22,000 sauare feet of floor area. d. A maximum of 302 seats shall be permitted for the church sanctuary facilities. e. Childcare shall be limited to a maximum of 200 children at anv one time. f. Homeless shelters and soup kitchens shall be prohibited. g. The CFPUD ordinance shall include development standards and buffers to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** C. LIST OF MAPS [page 19] Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Center Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria in Golden Gate Estates Temple Shalom Communitv Facilitv Subdistrict December 18, 2019 W GradyMinor Page 3 of 3 JFGNA-18 Exhibit IVB Proposed GMP Language-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Fl, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.grad,minor.com TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT (PL20180003708) EXHIBIT IV.D. PROPOSED GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP URBAN DESIGNATION ESTATES DESIGNATION AGRICULTUR-1 RURAL DESIGNATION MILD USE IS TRICT MIXED USE DISTRICT�re16eavnen�ao omme OUm°n ueemai uw uma QRemavwiEw�es Sumnim OR°aaeniuim�uly eanm CONDITIONAL USES SUBDISTRICT OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES ®° �� �M°M [=I-.,�S 1- ® R1�w PiO1BLppn P1B8GOLDEN GATE AREA COMMERCIALDISTRICT Ode OY°°'Y FUTURE LAND USE MAP ,6 � �N� I=IEa .up. �' P,wN�. m�.. m.nra core�nwis�m.ma COMM IMMOKALEE RD F _m:re . m. rev reL.w u. � vre ° oaa N.¢e u#aecwa � R ome eo�ri.meo-em°�oas.m�:e.. � comnren�.�w..i.re saw. mniswanue� � cai sw�nn ncore�imm � E .: srwons c°owswawu swumow. oN�. seweM co DO 7 F PINE R GE RD 0 N z a ° BLVD .84 Z m � L H N L 0 0.5 1 2 3 Mile! TO IN rc U BLVD SITE ESTATES DESIGNATION, COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT = 13.5± ACRES INTERSTATE 75 GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP ADOPTED-FEBRARY, 1991 AMENDED - MAY 19.1992 AMENDED - DECEMBER 4. 2007 ORD, NO. 200T-T7 AMENDED-OCTOBER 14,2008 ORD. NO. 20N-59 AMENDED -MAY 25, 1993 AMENDED -JULY 27.1993 AMENDED - JULY 28, 2010 ORD. NO. 2010-31 AMENDED-APRIL 12. 1— AMENDED -MARCH 14,1995 AMENDED-1ULY28.2010 ORD NO 2010-32 MENDED- SEPTEMBER 14. 2011 ORD, NO. 2011.29 AMENDED - NOVEMBER 18, 2014 NDORD. NO. 2014-41 AMENDED - OCTOBER 27, '99T AMENDED-APRIL 14, 1998 AMENDED- SEPTEMBER S. 1998 AMENDED - FESRUARY 23, 1BF- 99 AMENDED - MAY 9. 2000 AMENDED- NOVEMBER 10, 2015 ORD. NO, 2015 62 AM ORD NOM2016-012018 , 2 AMENDED - MARCH 13, 2001 AMENDED - MAY 14, 2002 AMENDED -SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 O AMEN R26,2004 ORD, NOT 2004-71 AMEN DED-JANUARY 25,2005 ORD. NO. 2005-3 AMENDED. JANUARY 25, 2007 ORD. NO. 2007-19 OIL WELL RD R26E I R27E I R28E INTERSTATE 75 R29E EXHIBIT IV.E TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT Collier County, Florida 0 AT a J U V R PINE RIDGE ROAD E B U V 0 a m j m m a m Q m m Q GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY Q J H Z Q Q O D' CD Z J d I � RADIO ROAD O o' a DAVIS BOULEVARD EXT. ADOPTED - ??, (Ord. No. 20-= 20-- ??) 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. LEGEND GOLDEN GATE ESTATES _ TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: ???????? DATE: ??/?? � •�� ' i e _ 500 FOOT RADIUS fit 0 150' 300' SCALE: 1" = 300' ZONED: E } t ti T WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11" RESIDENTIAL �� • ,,fir, .�•* r • ���` r �� PINE RIDGE ROAD 4r^ ` ++ • ZONED: E ZONED: E T o USE: RESIDENTIAL • I USE: RESIDENTIAL � • • 1 j � � � I• A SUBJECT PROPERTY -73.5±ACRES Y EXISTING ZONING: E, ESTATES -alit�i EXISTING FLUE: ESTATES DESIGNATION, MIXED USE DISTRICT, I , _ RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT 'T �kit • �, �' ,7 Vt - EXISTING USE: TEMPLE SHALOM AND PARTIALLY UNDEVELOPED • ADJACENT PROPERTY * ZONED: ENORTH f USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: E, ESTATES USE: RESIDENTIAL w SOUTH 3 �• tl� h ZONING: E, ESTATES m ,� •, , - USE: RESIDENTIAL / i �Alf, • r EAST ZONING: E,ESTATES s '•r� i ' f USE: RESIDENTIAL 5 R 4 '-•+ a WEST • - ZONING: E, ESTATES 'o ' ,� • * USE: RESIDENTIAL a TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT U1 Q. Crndy MI110r and ABBOClntes, P.A. JOB1 CODE: radyMinor 360o VIB Dei Hey ROnllu Springs, Flu ride 34134 EXHIBIT V.A. °m' 1wr zols Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects rnE o Cea. GP Anth. EB 0005151 Cert. GP Anti. IS 0005151 Bnsmess LC 26000266 DATE AERIAL FLOWN: JAN. 2019 JFGen-18 EXHIBIT vn Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 n wn.Grady I1ino,r— Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 SOURCE: COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER SHEET 1 OF 1 E-F TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT (PL20180003708) EXHIBIT V.B. EXISTING GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP LEGEND URBAN DESIGNATION ESTATES DESIGNATION AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION IT T g9TRICT ❑ 11— srmrxr«, Warn oismic, ❑ um , MR9,T tt9MNnu wms,Mcr ❑ aEs nu iA rM<r nioxu weusmmcr OVERLAYS AND u9s �49>aM—T «Do� «EAw9MT� i SPECIAL FEATURES ❑ mar�Rm� AaLAOM�. ■Ns . �9 ■MRK, �9.9Mu ■;_AND ® MA. .—.RA —L 9>aNS—T ■ �N laanl w909aK, u °( oa TM, NaK, ■ AMID: MNIE..an rM.NrACMI w9N:,aln ■'"L MmE Aa.9 M.Ln U. w9Ns1Mc, ■ A.Nonu eaMVN,9 a>MrE,+au w®rsmrc, ■ ro rts ❑ w caMNmau ❑ ci«,ra wso�sv+m, ■ sw,«srza«r arr�a sveas,mcr Tn GO C E+ IMMOKALEE ROAD SUBJECT SITE L CPSP-2013-11 / m VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD W GOLDEN GATE z a U E7 PINE RIDGE RD. 0 WHITE BLVD. In a F z .} m 0. G.G. PKWY. O ' a x G � NTERSTgTE_75 a z z a DAVIS BOULEVARD 03 O a 3 GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP BOULEVARD S.R. 84 IMMOKALEE ROAD OIL WELT. ROAD RANDALL BOULEVARD > m S.R. 84 m a SITE ESTATES DESIGNATION, MIXED 00 USE DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL d ESTATES SUBDISTRICT = 13.5± E- g'T ACRES D fe',T 'r p GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP ADOPTED - FEB Y. 1991 AMENDED - DECEMBER 4, 20W MD. NO. 2007-77 AMENDED -MAY 19, 1992 AMENDED - OCTONA 14. 2006 ORD. N0. 200S-59 AMENDED - MAY 25. 1993 AMENDED - JULY 27, 19M AMENDED - JULT 28. 2010 MD. N0. 2010-31 AMENDED - APRIL 12, 1994 AMENDED - JULY 28. 2010 ORD. NO. -0-32 AMENDED - MARCH 14. 1995 AMENDED - OCTOBER 27, 1997 AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 14. 2011 MD. NO. 2011-29 AMENDED - APRIL 14. 1998 AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 8, 1998 AMENDED - FEBRUART 23, 1999 AMENDED - NI—MBOR 18. 2014 ORD. NO. 2014-41 AMENDED - NOVEMBER 10, 2015 (Ord No. 2015-62) AMENDED - MAY 9, 2000 AMENDED - JUNE 13. 201] (Qtl. No. 201)-23) AMENDED - MARCH I}, 2001 AMENDED -MAY 14, 2002 MENDED - SEPIE — 10, 2003 ORD. NO. 2003-44 AMENDED - OCKSER 26, 20N 2:-]t ORORD. . NO.N0. AMENDED 1A - ANURY 25. 2005 O200.5-3 AMENDED - NUARY 25, 2007 ORD. N0.120U]-19 R26E O SCALE 0 1 MI. 2 MI. 3 MI. 4 MI. 5 MI. PREPARED SY: OS/CAD MAPPING SECTION GROWM MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: 1/2016 FILE: CPSP-2013-11-1.OWO R27E R28E 3.08.00 Environmental Data Purpose As per requirements in LDC Sections 3.08.00 and questions in the CU Checklist Preparation Of Environmental Data Preparation of Environmental Data, Environmental Data Submittal Requirement shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental science or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida Qualifications of Environmental Consultant Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. 2/96 - Present 3880 Estey Ave Naples, Florida 34104 Marco A. Espinar- Biologist Environmental Data. The following shall be submitted where applicable to evaluate projects. A) Wetlands i} Identify on Current Aerial / the location of all Collier County / SFWMD Jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System FLUCFCS A FLUCFCS map and vegetation inventory has been included. The site consists of approximately 13.52 acres. This is an existing development with approximately 4.43 acres of native vegetation. The initial development (SDP 90-128) included Tracts 65 and 68. Tract 64 (4.43 acres) was left undeveloped. The dominant habitat on this Tract 64 (4.43 acres) consists of (411) Slash Pine. This area primarily has a canopy of Slash pine, ear leaf acacia, and Melaleuca. The midstory is scattered with some cypress, cabbage palms and myrsine. B) Listed Species and Bald Eagle Nests and Nest Protection Zones i) Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the FFWCC and the USFWS. Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee. Wildlife Listed Species Study (LDC 10.02.3.A.2.m) A brief examination of the parcel found no listed animals on site. The parcel is located in the urban area and bordered by Pine Ridge Road to the north. The site does provide some functional habitat for small, medium mammals and birds. A listed species study was conducted and attached. No listed vertebrates species were found. ii) Provide Listed Plants identified in LDC Section 3.04.03 See Attached Vegetation List / FLUCCS Code Map A few TiIlandsia spp. were found on site. No other listed plants were found on site. iii) Wildlife Management Plans in accordance with LDC Section 3.04.00 See Attached Listed Species Study, Black bear and fox squirrel wildlife management plans may be required. C) Native Vegetation Preservation i} For Sites or Portions of Sites Cleared of Native Vegetation or in Agricultural Use: Not Applicable ii) Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the FLUCFCS system and provide a legend foe each of the FLUCFS codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or PPL. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve criteria pursuant to LDC section 3.05.07 have been meet. Location Maps / Aerials (LDC 10.02.3.A.2.m) Aerials and location maps have been provided. The entire parcel consists of approximately 13.52 acres. The parcel is on Pine Ridge Road in Section 15, Township 49, Range 26; in Collier County, Florida. Approximately, 4.43 acres is vegetated. The dominant forest type on this project site consists of (411) Slash pine. The site primarily has a canopy of Slash pine, ear leaf acacia, and Melaleuca. The midstory is scattered with some cypress, cabbage palms and myrsine. See Attached Location Maps, Vegetation Maps / FLUCCS Maps Native Vegetation Calculation (LDC3.05.07.A.) 3.05.07 Preservation Standards Approximately, 0.34 acres of Native vegetation was retained as part of the initial property development (SDP 90-128 for Tracts 65 and 68). The onsite 0.34 acres shall be deemed to meet the native vegetation requirements for Tracts 65 and 68. For the undeveloped Tract 64 (4.43 acres) a minimum of 15% or 0.66 acres of the existing native vegetation shall be retained. This 0.66 acres has been aligned towards the west end of the proposed parcel. The preserve extends along the west end from the north to south and along the southern property line. There are no additional established preserves to align this preserve with. A total of 1.0 acres will be retained on site. Approximately 0.34 acres from (Tracts 65, 68) and 0.66 acres (Tract 64) will be preserved. This will be consistent with Goal 6 of Collier County GMP's Objective 6.1 Protect native communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Clearly identify the location of all preserves: The preserve area has been identified on the Exhibit C Master plan. Soil Ground Water Sampling Natural Site ® MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPED' LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH U HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE, EAST OF PRESERVE, TO EXTEND 100' SOUTH PINE RIDGE ROAD E,ESTATES RESIDENTIAL MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPE'D'® LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH i' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE Oo H m W 0 � ZWO® LLLLX� Lu PROPERTY PROPERTY BOUNDARY BOUNDARY b z MINIMUM 6' WIDE .`.� - - - - - - - -- - C, LANDSCAPE BUFFER 4 GRASS PARKING o RESERVATION (SEE \ NOTE#2) -�` A 1 GRASS ❑ .`.`.`.`. oE,ESTATESa E, ESTATES PARKING I RESIDENTIAL m RESIDENTIAL .m`. LLm`,( I p p ------- z o C/) ` ' AREA RASS Z ' LL `,',` G) " o D MINIMUM 15' WIDE TYPE'B' I MINIMUM 15' !` WIDETYPE'B' m PARKINGHIM o m o ®LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE LANDSCAPE '.`. I Oz v o I BUFFER WITH 6' D �y ' GR - HIGH CHAIN LINK m PARKING I ° FENCE `.`. ® �' 0 SE TIC SYSTEM °o°oo LEGEND SEPTIC SYSTEM °°°°°°°°°° DRIVEWAY/PARKING OUTDOOR 64I TRACT 65_ PLAY AREA 651 TRACT 68_ BUILDING ,TRACT iTRACT —MINIMUM 15' WIDE TYPE'B' SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH® a E, ESTATES U HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SDP-90-128 - TRACTS 65 & 68 - 0.8± ACRES) RESIDENTIAL o 1z51 150, a SCALE: 1" = 150' a 0 PRESERVE TRACT 64 - 0.66 ACRES AND PRESERVE PER SDP-90-128 TRACT 65 & 68 - 0.34 ACRES WHEN PLOTTED@ 8.5 X 11 ❑# DEVIATION o. cra0y h41nor and nes°°e66E, P.A. GradyMinor 80B VIn De' Rory TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD ECA E. a _ ,m• JOB CODE: _s Boimn Springs, Fwr14 34134 EXHIBIT C DATE: Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects MASTER PLAN Cet.°e truth. BB 0005151 Cet.°e truth. LB 0005151 BMsmess LC 26000268 REVISED: 12/18/2019 JF°84-,8-MCP-R8V2 Bonlra Springs: 239.947.1144 uwu. lava dy9/innr. cnm Fort Myers: 239.090.4380 SHEET 1 OF 2 C, SITE SUMMARY TOTAL SITE AREA: 13.5± ACRE (AC) COMMUNITY FACILITY: 11.6± AC (86%) PRESERVE: 0.66± AC (5%) (TRACT 64) NATIVE VEGETATION: 0.34± AC (2%) (TRACT 65 AND 68 PER SDP-90-128) LANDSCAPE BUFFERS: 0.9± AC (7%) MAXIMUM BUILDING AREA: 22,000 S.F. (TRACT 64) 50,000 S.F. (TRACT 65 AND 68) OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED: 4.05± AC (13.5± AC X 0.30) PROVIDED: 4.05± AC PRESERVE: REQUIRED: 1.0 ACRES TRACT 65 AND 68: 0.34 ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION PER SDP-90-128 TRACT 64: 0.66 ACRES (4.43± ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION X 0.15) PROVIDED: 1.0 ACRES DEVIATIONS (SEE EXHIBIT E): 1�. GRASS PARKING (APPLIES TO ENTIRE PUD) 2❑ PARKING DISTRIBUTION (APPLIES TO ENTIRE PUD) 3❑ PRESERVE SETBACK FENCE 5❑ PRESERVE STANDARDS MC)TFG 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 11 2. PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH 4.06.02 AND 4.06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. IN ORDER TO MEET 4 THE REQUIREMENTS OF A TYPE 'B' BUFFER ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF THE PUD, A 6-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED ON THE MASTER PLAN. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PRESERVE DOES NOT MEET BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND g SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING WITHIN THE PRESERVE, PLANTINGS WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE 6' WIDE RESERVATION TO MEET THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. THE TYPE, SIZE, AND NUMBER OF SUCH PLANTINGS, IF NECESSARY, WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF INITIAL SDP OR PLAT AND INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE SDP OR PLAT. LEGEND TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD � g © G radyMinor �rD�� �7�OOr 204 808) CV. De NT OD CODE ;31100 ViO Dcl 2np cw, Bonita springs, Fw rlllt, 34134 EXHIBIT C ® DEVIATION DATENDA� Civil Engineers [,and Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects MASTER PLAN NOTES r��NAME:20 Ce,t ofVoV, HE0005151 Cut nr Amn. EE 005151 n05meaa EC 26000366 REVISED: 12/18/2019 - - - 9aDitnSprlDgs: 239.947.1144 11 u n.6'1ady11innr.r— Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 SHEET 2 OF 2 TEMPLE SHALOM LISTED SPECIES SURVEY Collier County, Florida January 2019 Prepared By: Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3880 Estey Avenue Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 263 - 2687 INTRODUCTION: This report is an account of a Listed wildlife and plants species survey recently performed on 4.43 acres of a 13.52 acre tract called Temple Shalom. Its purpose is to identify and describe key habitats and report any listed species using the site that would be at risk due to possible future development actions on the site. This survey and report are based on fieldwork performed during January 2019. The entire 13.52 acres site was examined however emphasis was placed on the vegetated 4.43 acres. DESCRIPTION: Temple Shalom consists of approximately 13.52 acres and is located in Section 15, Township 49, Range 26, in Collier County. This parcel is approximately 2 miles east of the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Interstate —75. The parcel is east of Logan Blvd on the south side on Pine Ridge Road. This parcel would be considered in the urban area and its surrounding areas are currently developed as single family homes. A drainage canal is located approximately 300 feet to the west. Approximately 4.43 acres along the western boundary are all naturally vegetated. This area consists primarily of a Slash pine canopy. Other trees are present such as cypress and cabbage palm. Exotics such as ear leaf acacia, java plum and Brazilian pepper are also present. This area would be considered upland. See Exhibit # 1 - Location Map Uplands 4.43 acres 411- Slash Pine Leaf litter is so dense that there is little diversity of ground cover. The ground cover is vegetated with occasional patches of swamp fern and saw grass. The availability of good functional habitat has been greatly restricted. This was the area examined for this report. LISTED SPECIES SURVEY: The required survey for a Listed Species Survey calls for a survey covering 100 % of the site, at prescribed transect distances per site acreage. Such a survey was conducted in January 14-1 S 2019. Established transects were oriented north - south and east - west and superimposed on an aerial map of the site. These transects were ground - located and walked by compass bearing. Early morning (0730 - 1000), mid -day (1100 - 1500) and late -day (1500 -1800) time periods were chosen to survey these transects. This survey was conducted daily for a minimum of five days. All possible species of plants and animals listed by state and federal agencies were noted. In addition, to the transects walked stationary observation was done on the developed areas including the oak hammock centrally located. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Listed Flora Several TilIandsia s -P. were seen on site. Refer to Exhibit # 2 - Cumulative Plant List Listed Fauna A description of the wildlife found onsite is provided below. Refer to Exhibit # 3 - Wildlife Species Observed Key Species Discussion: Taking into account the location and condition of the property and State and Federal listed species that could be found on or around the site include: Big Cypress Fox Squirrels The area is known as potential fox squirrel habitat. Observations were keyed to searching for signs or calls of these animals, such as leaf nests in canopy trees or the distinctive chattering of territorial squirrels. No individuals were observed foraging and/or inhabit ting the subject parcel. No chewed pines found. Florida Black Bear No individuals were observed during this survey even though Black bears are known to inhabit the general area. Special attention was given for signs such as scraps, tracks and scat. This mammal has a large home range and is known to inhabit the area. An Exhibit showing Black bear calls for this vicinity have been provided as an exhibit. Bonneted Bat The Florida bonneted bat is the largest species of bat in Florida_ Previously known as the Florida (Wagner's) mastiff bats these bats were reclassified as a separate species unique to Florida. The species can grow to a length of 6.5 inches with a wingspan of 20 inches. This is a flying mammal free to traverse great distances. Examination of all trees with potential cavities was conducted. The site does have some dead pines trees. The dead trees seem recent probably caused by Hurricane Irma. There are a few older dead trees. Special examination of all these trees were conducted. Specifically these trees were examined for any cavities and/or snags. The majority of the dead trees on site have not degraded sufficiently. The few cavities present did not meet site selection criteria. The cavities found were not high enough for a free falling bat exiting said cavity. In addition, the midstory density impedes flight. The density of Brazilian pepper and other midstory plants would impede flight patterns. No individuals and/or guano were found. This project does not anticipated to negatively impact the species. Gopher Tortoise This site does not offer suitable habitat for Gopher tortoise. Searches were keyed in areas with spoil material (mound). However, no signs or burrows were identified on any subject parcels. CONCLUSION: Taansects were walked on straight compass bearings along a grid spaced at approximately 30 yards apart for the entire parcel. Other transects were primarily meandering transects through areas of prime habitat. All transects were walked at varying times from post - dawn & mid -day to pre -sunset hours, The project site still has some recognizable character to support some limited foraging by some common small mammals and birds. Signs of small animal usage such as armadillo were readily visible. Several species of songbirds were seen utilizing this site, especially the canopy areas. The nature of the surrounding land uses and the availability of suitable habitat precludes utilization by large mammals. Several factors have contributed to the decline of the site. The site gives hints of a greater past ability to support major populations of mammals and birds. The main factors contributing to the decline of quality habitat are: 1) the level of exotic plant invasion, 2) the alteration of natural drainage and 3) encroaching development, The sites natural drainage pattern has been severely altered over the years. A drainage canal borders the parcel approximately No listed animal species or signs thereof were identified on the property. A few Tillandsia's spp. were observed on site. This is the only listed plant species observed on site. Vertebrates - Threatened Endan Bred and Species of Special Concern Species Black bear Florida panther Everglades mink Big Cypress Fox squirrel Bonneted Bat Indigo snake American alligator Gopher tortoise Gopher Frog Southeastern American kestrel Red -Cockaded woodpecker Florida Scrub Jay Wood stork Snail kite Bald eagle Limpkin Osprey White ibis Tricolored heron Snowy egret Reddish egret Little blue heron Listed Vegetation Present Absent Tillandsia spp. x x x x x x x x x x FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS CODE (Description) 411 Slash Pine — This parcel consists primarily of Slash pines, cabbage palms, ear -leaf acacia and Java plum. Single family to the south and west surrounds this area. Pine Ridge Road is located along the northern boundary. This parcel does have a small cypress area located to the north near Pine Ridge road. This area has a few cypress trees but is severely drained. Some remnant vegetation such as swamp fern can be seen. However, leaf litter, vines and the dominance of upland vegetation indicates severe draining. There is a drainage canal approximately 280 feet to the west. Common Name Slash Scientific Name Pinus Indictor Status Dominance/Stratum pine elhotti FACW Cp,C Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC M C Cypress Taxodium spp. OBL MHO Ear leaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis Exotic Cp.0 java plum *vium cumini Exotic Cp,C Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia Exotic Cp,O Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic M,C cocoplum Chrysobalanus icaco FACW M,O palmetto Serona repens FACU G O Guineagrass Panicum maximum FAC- G,O Wax myrtle Myreia cerifera FAC+ M O Hog plum Ximenia americana FAC M,O Buckthorn Bumelia reclinata FAC M,O bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum FACU G,C Florida trema Teema spp. FAC M O Beauty bush Callicarpa americana UPL M,O Myrsine Myrsine floridana FAC M,C wild coffee Psychotria nervosa UPL G,O Winged Sumac Rhus copallina UPL M O Beggers ticks Bidens alba FACW G.O salt bush Baccharis glomerulifolia FAC M,O Laurel oak Quercus virginicus FACU M,O Chocolate weed Melochia corchorifolia FAC G,O Hempweed Mikania scandens FACW G,O Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum FACW+ G,C Sword fern Nephrolepis spp. FAC GO Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU G,O Foxtail Setaria geniculata FAC G,O wiregrass Aristida stricta FAC- G,O Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- G,C Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC G,O 427 Oak Hammock This area is centrally located on the subject parcel. This area was previously preserve under a prior development order. This area consists of approximately 0.34 acres Live oak Quercus virginiana FACU M C Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia FACW C ? O p' Slash pine p Pinus elliotti FACW Cp,C Cypress Taxodium spp. OBL M O Cabbage palm Sahal palmetto FAC M,C Wild Pines wired -leaved VINES T. setacea Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia Virginia creeper Ampelopsis quinquefolia Cat -briar Smilax spp. Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans III Single Family 172 Church 1 Religious Facilities 510 Canal ABREVIATIONS — INDICATOR STATUS - FDA/T FAC G,C FAC G.0 FAC G,C FAC G,O Canopy (Cp), Midstory (M), Ground Cover (G) Dominant (D), Common (C), Occasional (0) Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAC), Upland (UPL) WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED Common Name Amphibian & Reptiles: Brown anole Birds Dove- mourning Brown Thrasher Northern flicker Bluej ay Carolina wren Gray catbird Northern mockingbird Cardinal Mammals: Virginia opossum Raccoon Nine -banded armadillo species Aeolis sWei Zenaida macroura Toxostoma rufum Cola tes auratus C anocitta cristata Thryothorus ludovicianus Dumetella carolinensis Mimus Poly lg ottos Richmondena cardinalis Didelphis vir iniana Procyon lotor Dasypus noverracinctu Status Ilk ;€ n 4 A� f#a + IYI GF7YY7.7� LV 1.7 k TRANSECTSI . Labels Drawing � �- Points Drawing N STATIONARY Lines Drawing OBSERVATION PoiygonsDrawing Selected Custom Parcels .. Streets Mapwise County Boundaries f Parcel Outlines - 0 1 -�o 246 36C ft Copyright 2017 Mapwise, Inc. All rights reserved. vo w,mapwise.com. This map Is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. Mapwise and its suppliers assume on responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. 9 I 0 PINE RIDGE RQ Note: All information is based on the latest data as made available by Florida Fish & Wildlife Commission (FWC 2019) Q Subject Property ":j Lnirr 1-Mile Radius 0 Black Bear Related Calls (FWC 2016-2018) FWC Black Bear Range Florida (2016) Black Bear Presence Abundant Common Occasional Rare Temple Shalom Collier County, Florida. 0 f �asEh Tack EARTH TECH ENVIRONMENTAL, IrLC 10600 JOLEA AVENUE BONITA SPR¢NGS, FL 34135 PHONE (239) 304-0030 FAX (239) 774-0800 WWW.ETEFLORfOA.COM Environmental, LLC FWC Black Bear Information 2RafECT NO. SCpG 9/15/19 NIA AS SHOWN Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit V.D. Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments The amendment proposes to amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) to create a new subdistrict, which will encompass the existing Temple Shalom property as well as an undeveloped 4.43+/- acre (Tract 64 GGE) of the property presently owned by the Temple Shalom. The subdistrict would permit the Temple to continue its present religious organization and pre-school activities, and to incorporate the unimproved 4.43± acre parcel into their overall campus plan, on which they will expand their religious organization activities in cooperation with the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN). The Temple initially received a conditional use for a church (religious facility) in 1989 on 9+/- acres of their property and subsequent conditional use approval for a pre-school. Their original application included all 13.5+/- acres under their ownership; however, because the Temple did not have more specific plans for the westernmost portion (Tract 64) of the property, the County Commission requested removal of that portion of the site from the provisional use application. The Temple was instructed to amend the conditional use once it decided upon more specific plans for use of Tract 64. In 1993, the Temple received conditional use approval for a childcare center on the 9+/- acres that had been developed with the Temple and associated uses (Resolution #93- 290). The original conditional use for the childcare facility limited enrollment to 70 children. However, due to increased demand in the area of non -denominational childcare, the number of children utilizing the Temple's childcare facility has increased over the years, with the County's knowledge. Indeed, in 2000, the Temple added approximately 21,000 square feet to its facilities, pursuant to SDP-90-128(E), to accommodate the increased demand. This past year, approximately 180 students utilized the childcare facility. The CFPUD proposed by this rezone application limits enrollment to 200 students to reflect the increased demand and utilization. Collier County approved the 1989 provisional use and the 1993 conditional use (allowed by policy) prior to the 1991 adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP). Those pre- existing uses have been deemed consistent by policy with the GGAMP. However, the Temple does not meet the GGAMP's locational criteria for churches and similar uses to obtain conditional use approval. Accordingly, a companion CFPUD rezone application has been filed with this GMPA application. As mentioned above, this GMPA application proposes to increase the number of students for the childcare facility to a maximum of 200. The childcare facility would continue to be limited to Tracts 65 and 68. However, the GMPA application also proposes to permit the religious and social organization uses on the entire 13.5+/- property (Tracts 64, 65 and 68). Temple Shalom provides congregants with a place to worship, observe religious studies and to provide a social resource for the Jewish faith. As part of its overall program activities, January 16, 2020 © GradyiNIinor Page 1 of 7 JFGNA-18 Exhibit VD Growth Management-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit V.D. Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments Temple Shalom partners with other Jewish faith agencies such as the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to provide a variety of services beyond worship or child day care. Most of these activities occur in some form presently at the Temple's campus and include: • Youth Activities • Philanthropic Activities • Social Action Activities • Volunteer Activities • Community Service • Community Events • Community Outreach • Interfaith Outreach • Men's and Women's Group Activities • Semi -catered Community Events • Book Lectures • Religious administrative functions such as administration, accounting, staff offices, and fund raising • Adult Jewish Education programs • Israel Education • Judaic Discussion Groups Obtaining the GMPA and companion CFPUD approval for religious facilities and related activities will permit the Temple and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples an opportunity to combine efforts to expand their community outreach for Jewish religious and cultural programming in a single campus environment, to meet the demands of the increasing population of those of the Jewish faith in Collier County. The Golden Gate Master Plan Restudy effort did not look at site -specific land parcels. The restudy was a very high-level policy analysis of the existing master plan. The proposed uses in the new subdistrict are compatible with the existing campus that houses the Temple and related religious organization activities and pre-school. The Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) has been submitted as a companion item, which will include buffers insuring compatibility with adjacent properties, as well as a conceptual master plan, identifying the location of the proposed buildings and site improvements on the entire 13.53+/- acre Temple Shalom campus property. It is unlikely that a domino effect for future non-residential uses will be created if the proposed plan amendment is approved. The approval of the amendment to allow expansion of the Temple and its social organization related uses on property owned originally intended for development by the Temple makes for efficient planning and use of existing infrastructure and site improvements. The Temple was originally approved authorizing two access points to Pine Ridge Road. The development of all of the January 16, 2020 W GradyMinor Page 2 of JFGNA-18 Exhibit VD Growth Management-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FT, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit V.D. Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments lands under the control and ownership of the Temple, as proposed, will allow Collier County to prohibit direct access to Pine Ridge Road from Tract 64. The proposed amendment is a logical land use change. Since adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in 1991, the County has made significant roadway improvements in the area including 4-laning Pine Ridge Road and 6-laning Collier Boulevard. Recognizing the location and pattern of development occurring in the immediate vicinity, the proposed land use change is logical, and it is compatible with the surrounding development. The companion CFPUD provides for a master plan on which proposed building locations, site improvements, open space, and buffers are depicted for the entire property owned by the Temple. Expansion of the proposed uses onto land currently owned by the Temple makes for efficient planning and utilization of the property for services for the Jewish faith in our community. Under Chapter 163 F.S., local governments are authorized to adopt and amend their comprehensive plans. Staff has requested that the applicant address three sections from Chapter 163. Chapter 163.3167 Scope of act.— (9) Each local government shall address in its comprehensive plan, as enumerated in this chapter, the water supply sources necessary to meet and achieve the existing and projected water use demand for the established planning period, considering the applicable plan developed pursuant to s. 373.709. The applicant intends to work with Collier County Water -Sewer District to extend potable water services currently serving Temple Shalom to this portion of their property. Wastewater will be handled through septic systems, similar to that serving the existing Temple Shalom facility. There are no existing or anticipated capacity issues for water services. Chapter 163.3177 (6) (a) 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. January 16, 2020 © GradyiNlinor JFGNA-18 Exhibit VD Growth Management-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Page 3 of 7 Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit V.D. Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. The 4.43± acres (Tract 64) is the amount of land required to permit expansion and development of the social, cultural and religious facilities needed by the Temple and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples. The study prepared by the Jewish Federation clearly documents a need for additional services in greater Naples to serve the growing Jewish population. This central location will serve the Jewish community and the sharing of infrastructure and space will benefit both the Temple and Jewish Federation. Chapter 163.3177 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. Public water service is available to the site, and wastewater can be accommodated on site. The balance of the property immediately adjacent to the subject property has been developed for the Temple, related religious facilities and pre-school uses, and permitting similar uses on their property makes logical planning sense and is an efficient use of land in that sharing existing infrastructure results from the approval of the amendment. 163.3184 Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or plan amendment. This section of the statute outlines the process and authority for agency review of plan amendments. The applicant understands that regional and state reviewing agencies will be responsible for review of any comprehensive plan amendments per the requirements of Chapter 163.3184 F.S. The applicant's experts are of the opinion that there are no regional or state impacts associated with the application. Although the new subdistrict encompasses 13.5± acres, it represents an increase of only 4.3± acres for use by the Temple, as their existing campus is located on approximately 9± acres of land within the subdistrict. January 16, 2020 © GradyiNfinor Page 4 of 7 JFGNA-18 Exhibit VD Growth Management-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit V.D. Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments Project Justification Temple Shalom is a reform Jewish congregation that emphasizes Jewish worship and learning, service and community. It has over 1200 members. Its 13.5± acre property is located at Golden Gate Estate Unit 26, tracts 64, 65 & 68, on Pine Ridge Road east of the intersection of Logan Boulevard and Santa Barbara. Tracts 65 and 68 are developed and include a synagogue, day school and parking lot. Tract 64 is currently undeveloped. The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN) currently resides over a Pet Food store in a shopping plaza on the southeast corner of Airport Pulling Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road. The JFGN occupies approximately 3800sf consisting of community space, conference rooms and administrative offices. The space is insufficient to meet the current, let alone, future needs of the growing Jewish community. JFGN has over 1700 women in its Women's Cultural Alliance and over 600 men in its Men's Cultural Alliance. These organizations have a number of social, recreational, cultural, educational and social service initiatives taking place multiple days each week during Naples' busiest season (October -April). In addition, another of JFGN's activities, the Jewish Book Festival, hosts 12 book events during season, which attract between 200-400 attendees per event. The Jewish Book Festival needs a more permanent home as it currently leases space in various venues around Naples. JFGN's current facility is simply inadequate to meet these organization's immediate space requirements. In early 2018, the JFGN retained Investment Property Consultants and one of its principals, Craig Timmins, to assist it in identifying space to lease or buy, or land to purchase to build a new facility. JFGN looked at over 40 properties in Greater Naples during its search for an appropriate property. Many of these properties were in shopping centers where the landlords required commercial/consumer tenants. Others were not large enough or did not have sufficient parking for JFGN needs. Land in the center of Greater Naples is over $1MM an acre, which JFGN could not afford. This search took place from March 2018 until JFGN reached agreement with Temple Shalom to lease its undeveloped parcel and build a new facility which will be approximately 22,000 sf. Temple Shalom's generous offer to lease JFGN the land was an ideal solution for both parties. Temple Shalom has owned their property almost 30 years and now wishes to develop the remaining undeveloped parcel. On January 29, 2019, Temple Shalom membership voted and approved a Letter of Intent to lease Tract 64 to the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples for 50 years. January 16, 2020 W GradyMinor Page 5 of 7 JFGNA-18 Exhibit VD Growth Management-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FT, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit V.D. Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments Temple Shalom is applying for a PUD and Large Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment that will allow the construction of a new JFGN building on Tract 64. At the time the Collier County BCC approved the conditional use for two of the three tracts (the eastern most land), Tract 64 was not approved for use because there were no immediate plans for development. However, Temple Shalom was told that, should it wish to use that land in the future, it should request conditional use approval from the County. The Temple is doing so now. SIC Code 8661 defines Religious Organizations as: "Establishments of religious organizations operated for worship, religious training, or study, government or administration of an organized religion, or for promotion of religious activities." The mission of JFGN is to enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by recognizing and supporting the charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of the Jewish community locally, nationally, overseas and in the State of Israel. Leaders of both Temple Shalom and JFGN believe the mission of the JFGN is similar to that of Temple Shalom, and that there are many benefits that the proposed campus will provide to both organizations, the larger Jewish Community and Collier County. The location of this parcel is also convenient for the participants of the activities run during the week by the JFGN and its affiliates. A recent demographic study conducted by Brandeis University regarding the Jewish community in Greater Naples identified that 30% of Jewish residents live in lower Lee County and Marco Island, such that locating JFGN's site close to 1-75 is a significant benefit. The overall population growth east of 1-75 also makes this location a favorable site. Temple Shalom believes that, by joining with the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples and creating a campus environment, it will also benefit from having an enhanced security presence. JFGN and Temple Shalom are already working with the Collier County Sheriff's office of Community Engagement on how to proactively design security for this new proposed campus and our respective facilities to assure optimal protection. Lastly, both Temple Shalom and JFGN support the non-Jewish community as well. Temple Shalom has been a very good neighbor and contributor to the Naples community. During Hurricane Irma, Temple Shalom opened its doors to those in need providing a temporary respite for many local residents. Temple Shalom regularly collects food to contribute to local food pantries, and its annual Mitzvah Day includes many community service efforts for many organizations in Collier County. Over the almost 30 years Temple Shalom has been at this location, there have been no issues with its neighbors. The JFGN also serves the broader non- Jewish community in many ways. It financially supports the "Shop with the Sherriff" program January 16, 2020 © GradyiN1inor Page 6 of 7 JFGNA-18 Exhibit VD Growth Management-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, F1, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit V.D. Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments which provides Christmas gifts for over 100 disadvantaged youth, and, along with Temple Shalom, joins with the Catholic Church in holding an annual Jewish -Catholic dialogue event. JFGN participates in the Martin Luther Day parade with many other Collier County organizations, and it is a major funder of the Naples Senior Center, which serves senior citizens of all religious denominations across the county. We believe this proposed application to create a campus on Pine Ridge Road serving both Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples will be a significant benefit to each of our organizations, the overall Jewish community and the greater Naples community overall. We look forward to working with Collier County staff to assure that we are meeting all stakeholder needs as we seek approval of our request. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: This project is consistent with Goal 6 of Collier County GMP's Objective 6.1 Protect native communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Native habitat has been identified onsite and the required preservation set aside. The area identified qualifies as native Pine flatwoods. January 16, 2020 W GradyMinor Page 7 of 7 JFGNA-18 Exhibit VD Growth Management-rev2.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FT, 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.eom • www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit V.D.1(4) COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY lr 11 Jewish Federation' ' OF COLLIER COUNTY rr1T i l THE STRENGTH OF PEOPLE THE POWER OF A COMMUNITY 60616 w1 Y� Y 4 .�irr Acknowledgments The Brandeis research team is grateful to the Jewish Federation of Collier County for the opportunity to collaborate to develop and conduct the 2017 Community Study. The study was proposed and sponsored by the Jewish Federation of Collier County, whose staff, Board of Directors, and Community Study Committee provided valuable input on the study design, questionnaire, and report. We are particularly grateful to Executive Director Jeffrey Feld, Board Chair Jane Schiff, and Past Chair Alvin Becker for teaching us about the community and helping ensure that our work would be of the highest quality and utility for the Collier County Jewish community. We also thank the many respondents who completed the survey. Without their willingness to spend time answering numerous questions about their lives, there could be no study. We are deeply grateful for the efforts of our colleagues at the Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies, led by Prof. Leonard Saxe, Director of the Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies and Steinhardt Social Research Institute. Janet Krasner Aronson provided insight into every step of the project, particularly in developing the survey, creating the sample, and designing the weights. Particular thanks go to Sarah Harpaz, who programmed the survey, managed respondent communications, corresponded with community members, and developed the maps. This project truly would not have gone as smoothly as it did without her ceaseless efforts. We are also appreciative of the assistance provided by our colleagues in programming the survey: Shahar Hecht, Breanna Vizlakh, Naomi Weinblatt, and Matthew Feinberg; and Graham Wright who assisted with respondent communications. We thank the dedicated team of students who worked on various elements of the project. David Manchester, Leora Kagedan, Rachel Gabrilowitz, Tamar Shachaf Schneider, and Jeffrey Hart cleaned mailing and membership lists to prepare the survey sample. Joelle Mark Anthony, Rivka Cohen, Sarah Durkin, Rachel Gabrilowitz, Tommy Gao, Yaoyao Gao, Jeffrey Hart, Mariah Manter, Joana Martin, Izabella Nickel, Tamar Shachaf Schneider, Joanna Spyra, and Melissa Viezel called respondents and administered the survey. Joelle Mark Anthony, Yaoyao Gao, Jeffrey Hart, Leora Kagedan, Mariah Manter, Tamar Shachaf Shneider, Joanna Spyra, and Gal Zahori spent countless hours searching for missing contact information for members of the sample. We thank Yves Bruno and Shay Bar Nissim for their work as the calling supervisors and Lev Paasche-Orlow and Camille Evans, who worked tirelessly coding responses to open-ended questions in the survey and formatting data into the Comparison Chart. Finally, we are grateful to Deborah Grant for her editorial advice and feedback, Masha Lokshin for graphic design assistance, and Ilana Friedman for her logistical support throughout the study. 1® COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 2 Contents Executive Summary......................................................................... 4 Findings.................................................................................................... 5 Population Size and Characteristics ............................................ 5 Strengths of the Community.......................................................34 Gaps in the Community............................................................... 35 FutureDirections.................................................................................. 36 COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY Executive Summary The Jewish Federation of Collier County commissioned the first -ever scientific study of the Jewish population of Greater Naples to ensure that there would be accurate, up-to-date data available to help make strategic decisions in the coming years. The study consisted of a representative -sample survey of households that are affiliated in any way with local Jewish organizations, as well as households identified on a market research list that had a higher -than -average probability of being Jewish but were not known in any way to local Jewish organizations. The survey was conducted between February 8, 2017, and May 7, 2017. Overall, 936 households in the Greater Naples area completed the survey. The Greater Naples Jewish community is estimated to consist of 5,250 households, of which 4,500 live in Collier County. There are 8,800 Jewish individuals in the community, including 7,550 who live in Collier County. The remainder live in adjacent counties, primarily Lee County, but participate with one or more Jewish organizations in Collier County. About two -fifths of households have another residence; about half of these are in the Northeastern United States and about one -quarter are in the Midwest. About three-quarters of seasonal residents feel connected to the Jewish community where they have their other residence, presenting a challenge to Jewish organizations in Collier County that seek to engage them. The Jewish community of Collier County is largely a retirement community, with nearly two-thirds of the population aged 70 or older. There is potential for growth as Jewish Baby Boomers around the United States, particularly in the Northeast and Midwest, retire and think about moving to warmer climates. However, the older nature of the community also indicates potential for shrinking as elderly residents pass away or move to be closer to children or grandchildren. There are only about 400 Jewish families in the community that are currently raising children. As is typical of an aging community, many households have health challenges. One -fifth include at least one person in fair or poor health, and 13% had at least one health emergency in the past year. Six percent indicated that health challenges had constrained their participation in Jewish life. Although the community is relatively affluent, there are pockets of need. Seven percent of households indicated that they are just getting along, poor, or nearly poor. Similar proportions indicated that they face significant non -medical financial hardships in the past year, would have trouble paying expenses related to an emergency, or that their finances had constrained their participation in Jewish life. Community members enjoy a rich and varied Jewish religious and cultural life, though some seasonal residents reserve their communal religious engagement for the other communities where they live. About half of households have either low or no formal involvement in the organized Jewish community of Collier County. Two -fifths of households currently belong to a Jewish congregation, but only one -quarter belong to a congregation in Collier County. Another two -fifths are former members of a congregation, whether in Collier County or elsewhere; most of these are long-term year-round residents of Naples. Community members engage in wide variety of Jewish ritual and cultural activities throughout the year. Two - fifths of households have someone affiliated with either the Men's or the Women's Cultural Alliance (or both). Nearly two-thirds have been to Israel at least once. The overall perception of community members is that Collier County Jewish organizations work well together and are cooperative, but a lack of resources such as a Jewish community center or cultural center may prevent greater cooperation and greater engagement of community members. Maintaining high -quality care for aging or unwell members of the community and providing services to members of the community with financial needs are also significant challenges. MCOLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 4 Population Size and Characteristics Greater Naples Jewish Population • An estimated 7,550 Jews live in 4,500 households in Collier County, including 6,950 adults and 600 children. • At least 1,250 Jews from adjacent counties, primarily Lee County, live in one of approximately 750 households in which someone is an active participant in or supporter of the Collier County Jewish community. COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY Jewish Households Greater Collier Naples 5,250 County Only 4,500 Adults 9,300 8,000 Jewish Adults 8,200 6,950 Non -Jewish Adults 1,100 1,050 Children 800 750 Jewish Children 600 600 Non Jewish Children Total Individuals 200 10,000 150 8,750 Jews 8,800 7,550 Non -Jews 1,300 1,200 5 Population Size and Characteristics Where do Jews in Greater Naples Live? The Jewish population of Greater Naples is most heavily concentrated in northern Collier County, particularly in ZIP codes 34108, 34109, 34110, and 34119. This area is bounded by the Lee County line in the north, Pine Ridge Road in the south, Collier Boulevard in the east, and the Gulf of Mexico in the west. About 15% of Jewish households in Greater Naples live in Marco Island or adjacent areas. One dot = 20 Jewish households Dots randomly placed within ZIP code COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 33 91' l 33533 M99 33905 339 T2 {{{1 Ife 33391 ee Rp 339 i4 904 Lee 91A • 33312 33913 sT ' �.� i 339�3 •3 • • rsrs92s Community Organizations Legend 1 Jewish Federation of Collier County, Humanistic Jewish Chavurah 2 Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida 3 Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 6 Jewish Congregation of Marco Island 7 Naples Jewish Congregation 8 Temple Shalom 0 5 10 20 Miles I • rs41 io 33s3e Palm Beach m^ f Hendry 33440 V 34142 '75 c~. ade%Y � F45 Staff¢ � &4 —IT Collier .� .141 ya; }wy 41 Ta Miami T4 £ • o9osr Monroe E— 5 National P—s—i- I Population Size and Characteristics Close-up view of Jewish households in Greater Naples Note: Jewish Congregation of Marco Island not visible in this map One dot = 20 Jewish households Dots randomly placed within ZIP code COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY N � • r x `t 34135 ■ 34j 34 * �* ■ N � 3a110 # ■ N 4 ■ r ■ ■ �:411 9 Community Organizations Legend 1 341 ` ■ Y 1 Jewish Federation of Collier County, 4 Humanistic Jewish Chavurah ■ ■■ 2 Holocaust Museum and Education Center ■ of Southwest Florida 3 ■ , 4 s 3 Jewish Family and Community Services 2 ■ ■ w 3411 s of Southwest Florida ■ 341 a5 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples ■ 5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 5 6 Jewish Congregation of Marco Island ■ 7 Naples Jewish Congregation , +341 ad ■ ■ 8 Temple Shalom 34102 re ■ bwd ■ �r ■ ryF 34112 ■ 34142 34120 ■ ■ Population Size and Characteristics Tenure and Type of Residence ■ Year -Round ■ Seasonal, Primary ■ Seasonal, Secondary COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY $ Population Size and Characteristics Where do seasonal residents live? • 43% of households (approx. 2,100 overall, 1,700 in Collier County) own multiple homes • Primarily concentrated in Marco Island, northern Collier County, and southern Lee County • The locations of their second homes: 0 The Northeastern US: 48% 0 The Midwestern US: 28% 0 Elsewhere in Florida: 12% 0 Elsewhere in the Southern US: 4% 0 The Western US: 2% 0 The rest of the world: 6% • 2/3 of seasonal residents consider Greater Naples their primary residence • 78% feel connected to the Jewish community where they have the second home; 33% very connected One dot = 20 Jewish households Dots randomly placed within ZIP code Red • =Seasonal households, primary residence Orange • = Seasonal households, secondary residence Yellow = Year-round households 1 COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 33993 3390s 33905 22972 33971 33935 �mO'��'ee Rar 33974 Lee �" f 912 33913 33929 ■ 3413 34120 ■ ■ ■ 24110 ■ ■ 3411 s 1—f r 34142 � fzs Hendry Palm Beach 33440 93 gee"w'Be 2 , 5 : slogV-1'NY Community Organizations Legend 34104 34117 1 Jewish Federation of Collier County, 34112 Collier Humanistic Jewish Chavurah • 2 Holocaust Museum and Education Center �4113 34141 of Southwest Florida = 3 Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples N 34114 %1,01 ao 5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center s S Hrry 41 Ta eT1 6 Jewish Congregation of Marco Island = 7 Naples Jewish Congregation 8 Temple Shalom 0 5 10 20 Miles t 00097 Monroe _ _ S National Parx ^_-mice 9 Population Size and Characteristics Seasonal residents, close-up view • Spent on average 7.6 months in the Naples area during the past year 0 Seasonal, primary residence is Greater Naples: 8.6 months 0 Seasonal, secondary address is Greater Naples: 5.4 months • 34% plan to increase the time they spend in Greater Naples; 64% do not plan changes • Over half own a burial plot in another community (compared with 22% of year- round residents) Note: Jewish Congregation of Marco Island not visible in this map One dot = 20 Jewish households Dots randomly placed within ZIP code Red • = Seasonal households, primary residence Orange • = Seasonal households, secondary residence Yellow = Year-round households COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 33928 N� ■ ■ y ■ i °' ■ L e ■ N , 2 ■ `t 34135 341 34 ■ .a ■ 3411 0 ■34119 C `!ller C ■ 34168 34109 ■ ■ ■ ■ 8 3 ■ Community Organizations Legend 1 Jewish Federation of Collier County, 2 w 3411E Humanistic Jewish Chavurah 341A , 2 Holocaust Museum and Education Cente m ■ of Southwest Florida ■ �" " 3 Jewish Family and Community Services 34104 of Southwest Florida 34102 r 18wd 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 34112 6 Jewish Congregation of Marco Island 4s 7 Naples Jewish Congregation 8 Temple Shalom yr a 2.5 5 1O Miles ■34113 34114 3_"142 Pkw+� 34117 US X.tbv I Pan Service 10 Population Size and Characteristics Age and Gender of All Residents of Jewish Households Ages 90+ Ages 80-89 Ages 70-79 21 % Ages 60-69 Ages 50-59 Ages 40-49 Ages 30-39 Ages 18-29 Ages 10-17 Ages 0-9 8% < 1% 5% 3% , 5% 2% ' 2% 1% I 1% 1% I 1% 3% , 1% 1% 1 1% ■ Male Female 14% 18% COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 11 Population Size and Characteristics Age and Gender of Jewish Residents of Jewish Households Ages 90+ Ages 80-89 Ages 70-79 24% Ages 60-69 Ages 50-59 Ages 40-49 Ages 30-39 Ages 18-29 Ages 10-17 Ages 0-9 2%1 <1 10% = 6% 1% I 1% 1% I 1% 2% 1 2% ' 1% ■ Male Female COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 12 Population Size and Characteristics Denomination and Marital Status Denomination Orthodox 3% Other 2% Just Jewish 8% Secular/ Cultural 13% Renewal <1% Reconstructionist I% Marital Status Inmarried 53% Intermarriage rate = 24% Intermarried 16% COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 13 Population Size and Characteristics Households with Children • —400 Jewish households with children (including adults in high school) in the Naples area, —300 raising children as Jews • Heaviest concentration in ZIP codes 34109and 34119 • About 250 households enroll their children in some form of Jewish education: pre-school, part-time school, summer camp, youth group, or an Israel trip. One dot = 20 Jewish households Dots randomly placed within ZIP code Blue • = Households with kids Red • = Households without kids COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 33993 3390 • 33 33914 ` C P HE 33905 33972 33971 33974 Lee 12 22913 ■ 339�48 ■ ■ Js4135 34120 ►■ t4.11_ M.3a11 Community Organizations Legend 1 Jewish Federation of Collier County, 34112 Humanistic Jewish Chavurah 2 Holocaust Museum and Education Center ■ of Southwest Florida411 3 Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 6 Jewish Congregation of Marco Island = 7 Naples Jewish Congregation 8 Temple Shalom 0 5 10 20 Miles ■ ■ ■ 33935 Palm Beach Hendry 33440 34142 ■ y75 Lti'e adNs>�'Y � F75 grate 93 FRAa<a tom' B 3411 7 Collier 34141 sag rr ao ■ 00097 Monroe ftl .time I Para Service 14 Population Size and Characteristics Households with Children (close-up view) Note: Jewish Congregation of Marco Island not visible in this map One dot = 20 Jewish households Dots randomly placed within ZIP code Blue • = Households with kids Red • = Households without kids MCOLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY ~ �JJ 33928 N� ■ ■ .� L e ■ Community Organizations Legend 3 1 Jewish Federation of Collier County, 2 • Y Humanistic Jewish Chavurah , •■i • w 3411s aa1o5 2 Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida ■ ■• • �-Y64 3 Jewish Family and Community Services 5 ■ • ■ of Southwest Florida ■■ 34194 ■ 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples 4102 r ■ �IBW ■ 5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center �+r 6 Jewish Congregation of Marco Island n� 34112 �s 7 Naples Jewish Congregation 8 Temple Shalom y, 0 2.5 5 10 Miles �, ■ 34114 ■ 34142 34120 r ■ ■ 3411 7 9S US R.ticna I Pa S-,ix 15 Population Size and Characteristics Health/Wellness • 20% of households include someone in fair or poor health • 10% of households required counseling or mental health services • 13% of households required assistance with home maintenance • 13% of households had a medical emergency in past year • 6% of households were constrained from Jewish life due to health reasons 0 Limited physical mobility 0 Inability to access private transportation 0 Chronic illnesses 0 Terminal diseases MCOLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 16 Population Size and Characteristics Financial Well -Being • 6% of households had a significant financial hardship in the past year not related to health issues • 5% could not afford an emergency $400 expense Nearly 1 • 4% were unable to participate in Jewish life for 1 financial reasons • 85% of adults in Jewish households are retired Just Getting Along • Of respondents who answered a question 5% about household income: 0 55% had income of $100,000+ 0 21% had income of $50,000 to $99,999 0 20% had income of $25,000 to $49,999 0 5% had income under $25,000 COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 17 Population Size and Characteristics Synagogue Members • 42% of households (40% in Collier County) currently belong to a synagogue, minyan, chavurah, or other Jewish congregation • 26% of households belong to a congregation in Collier County • 23% of households belong to congregations outside of Collier County One dot = 20 Jewish households Dots randomly placed within ZIP code Blue • = Members of Collier County congregations Red • = Non-members of Collier County congregations COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 22905 335?2 33971 ■ ��'��'ee Rd 33974 Lee 2 33913 33928 • �4.13 I• 34120 ■ ■ 4111 ■ • Community organizations Legend "' 1 Jewish Federation of Collier County, Humanistic Jewish Chavu rah 2 Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida 3 Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 6 Jewish Congregation of Marco Is€and 7 Naples Jewish Congregation 8 Temple Shalom 0 5 10 20 Miles I I I I I I I I 33935 Hendry A3�1 � FT5 4 ��e Stye tbNf B 5�ffi Hw4 93 { „ C0'IIier ■ • s: Palm Beach 33440 2a141 US ttwr 4, T nl.rre Td 9 00097 Monroe 5 Natl-.I Park Service 18 Population Size and Characteristics Synagogue Members (close-up view) • 40% of households used to belong to a congregation somewhere but no longer do 0 75% of these are year-round residents and 25% are seasonal residents 0 71% have been in Naples 10+ yea rs Note: Jewish Congregation of Marco Island not visible in this map One dot = 20 Jewish households Dots randomly placed within ZIP code Blue • = Members of Collier County congregations Red • = Non-members of Collier County congregations COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY , �V� 33928 N ■ ■ � f L e ■ ■ { , N z `t 3d135 3fl1 � � , ■ ■ 1, 3411 Q' , ■■ ■ � ■Cptl�!!er ■a ■ ■ �1 8 s<4169 Community organizations Legend ma's ■� 1 3ewish Federation of Collier County, - Humanistic Jewish Chavurah 2 HolocaustMuseum and Education Center of Southwest Florida 3 Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 6 Jewish Congregation of Marco Island 7 Naples Jewish Congregation 8 Temple Shalom 0 2.5 5 10 Miles ■ 34142 ■ 341A 34516 1 3■Af 05 ■ � 1 ■ • �ryL� 34112 ■ y ■ II 34�1� ■ i� 34117 US N atk..I Park Service 19 Population Size and Characteristics Ritual Practices • 51% attended High Holiday services • 43% fasted on Yom Kippur (11% could not fast) • 41% lit Shabbat candles at least sometimes, 8% always • 81% attended or hosted a Passover seder • 77% lit Chanukah candles • 21% follow some form of kosher rules 0 3% keep kosher at home only 0 2% keep kosher at all times Attended Services COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 20 100 14% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Discussed Jewish Topics Population Size and Characteristics Monthly Participation in Jewish Activities 39% 42% Searched Online for Ate Jewish Foods Jewish Information COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 51% Accessed Jewish Culture 79 82% Studied Jewish Text Attended Shabbat Meal Never ■ At Least Once ■ Weekly or More 21 Population Size and Characteristics Men's and Women's Cultural Alliances • 38% of households say that at least one member belongs to the Men's Cultural Alliance or the Women's Cultural Alliance • Member households are more likely to be seasonal residents and newer to Naples One dot = 20 Jewish households Dots randomly placed within ZIP code Blue • = Belong to the MCA/WCA Red • = Do not belong to MCA/WCA COLLIER COUNTYJEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 33993 33303 • 335 3391s y g& F 33905 33972 33971 h,mokw ee Rd 33974 Lee 33913 ■ r, .r 2 Community ❑rganizatlons legend 1 Jewish Federation of Collier County, Humanistic Jewish Chavu rah 2 Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida 3 Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 Chabad of Naples ]ewish Community Center 6 ]ewish Congregation of Marco Is€and 7 Naples Jewish Congregation 8 Temple Shalom 0 5 10 20 Miles I I I I I I I I •■ 33928 ■ ■ ■ F 4 I 34142 dA 9Fale Siam HwY 05 tea[ ■■ 3d117 Corrie� s" ■ 13■ 7 • • ■ 3a,s� age . - ev Palm Beach Hendry 33^^-=C '75 34141 1}5 Hrry 41 Ta m-A V E 00097 Monroe S Matio-I Pecs S A- 22 Population Size and Characteristics Men's and Women's Cultural Alliances (close-up view) • MCA/WCA are big draws for Lee County residents • MCA/WCA offer great potential for additional outreach to unaffiliated, seasonal residents, and people living farther from institutional center of the community Note: Jewish Congregation of Marco Island not visible in this map One dot = 20 Jewish households Dots randomly placed within ZIP code Blue • = Belong to the MCA/WCA Red • = Do not belong to MCA/WCA Rom COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY ■33923. � Aft S E A ' L e • N ■ R `' 3d135■ 341 34 a ■ a i , 3b`11 0 � , • ■ 3411 9 I■ 3d1os a�'1os ► , Community Organizations Legend - 1 3 ew i sh Federati on of Cc l l i er Cou nty, s ■ 3 a4+15 Humanistic Jewish Chavurah ■ 2 Holocaust Museum and Education Center ' of Southwest Florida 3 Jewish Family and Community Services • , UT00 ' of Southwest Florida , �+ os` 3 e 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples r ■ 5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 3r7r 6 3ewish Congregation of Marco Island os ' 7 Naples Jewish Congregation E ■f 8 Temple Shalom ' 0 2.5 5 10 Miles 3 3 34142 24120 ■ ga;e l-TMY 93 E�x9+� PAY $ll+a 11pYE4 34117 ■ 34114 - ■ ■ US katb—I Pays Service 23 100 80% 60 44 40 20 0% Population Size and Characteristics Participation in Jewish Organizations 49% Pays Dues 57% 64% 64% 59% Participated in Program ■ Naples ■ Second Home Overall 69% 73% Read Material 81% COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 24 30% 25 20 15% 10% 5% 0% Population Size and Characteristics Volunteering for and with Jewish Organizations 16% 23% 17% Leadership Role 28% 21 % 21 Support Service ■ Naples ■ Second Home ■ Overall 14% 7% As Participant 16% COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 25 Population Size and Characteristics Philanthropic Participation • 92% donated to any organization • 80% donated to at least one Jewish organization • 57% donated to at least one Jewish organization in the Naples area • 58% received a donation request from a Jewish organization in Greater Naples • 4% are leaving a bequest to a Naples Jewish organization COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY Donors to the Naples support Jewish Federation of Collier County 60% A local synagogue 55% JFCS of Southwest Florida 23% A Jewish school or camp 13% Other Jewish groups (e.g., the Holocaust Museum, Israel organizations, Hadassah, the ADL) 51 26 Population Size and Characteristics Community Involvement • Involvement in the Collier County Jewish community was determined by: 0 Membership in Local Jewish Organizations (synagogues, MCA/WCA, other local Jewish organizations and groups) 0 Participation in Local Jewish Organizations (attending programs, reading materials, paying dues) 0 Support of Local Jewish Organizations (donations, volunteering) • Households are broken down into: 0 No Involvement: 28% 0 Low Involvement: 26% 0 Moderate Involvement: 31% 0 High Involvement: 15% MCOLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 27 Population Size and Characteristics Community Involvement, High Involvement Versus All Others • High -involvement households are distributed throughout the Greater Naples area, but are most heavily concentrated in northern Collier County • A substantial number of high - involvement households also come from Southern Lee County One dot = 20 Jewish households Dots randomly placed within ZIP code Blue • = High involvement levels Red • = Moderate, low, or no involvement levels COLLIER COUNTYJEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY I 33917 33993 33909 33905 33972 33971 Y 1 33991 T Nn.po��e • 3390, L e e 3391- 33912 33913 f ■ y 33928 33974 Community organizations Legend 1 Jewish Federation of Collier County, Wit,= 4 Humanistic Jewish Chavurah 2 HolocaustMuseum and Education Center of Southwest Florida 3 Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 6 Jewish Congregation of Marco Island = ' 7 Naples Jewish Congregation 8 Temple Shalom 0 5 10 20 Miles 3g120 ■ ■ mate t-iwY BA 5■p WwY g3 34tt7 • • Hendry Palm Beach 22440 34142 H75 Eye ades'Y yy F75 gate Collier 34141 1e t t a Sya N.y. Bp • ■ ■ us Td E 00097 Monroe S NBtio IF80 Service 28 Population Size and Characteristics Community Involvement, No Formal Involvement Versus All Others No -involvement households are distributed throughout the Greater Naples area but are in highest concentration in outlying areas, away from the institutional center of the community One dot = 20 Jewish households Dots randomly placed within ZIP code Blue • = No formal involvement Red • = High, moderate, or low involvement levels COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 3391' 33993 33909 33900 33971 33935 a�. 33991 3397d N 3390d Lee �" f 33914 33912 33913 + �e� 339 S $� • ��H -r ■ 33928 • ■ L'J'413 ■ � 3d120 ■ Community Organizations Legend 1 Jewish Federation of Collier County, Humanistic Jewish Chavurah 2 Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida 3 Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center b Jewish Congregation of Marco Island 7 Naples Jewish Congregation 8 Temple Shalom 0 5 10 20 Miles I I I I I I I I ■ 8d stye iee HwY 93 ��e rN+Y 3d11] Palm Beach Hend ry 33440 3d1 11 rya ades�'Y � fT5 Collier 34141 • �rti eo jjj H.rry 41 Tartne rtF Td E 0009T Monroe 5 Net. -I Par[ Snvice 29 Population Size and Characteristics "To you personally, to what extent is being Jewish a matter of . 0 " Community 82/ 42% Religion 85/ 46% Ethnicity Culture 57% 73% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY Any 95% 0 Very Much 100% 100% 30 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Population Size and Characteristics Feels Part of Jewish Communities 6% ■ Global 17% Naples Not at All A Little ■ Somewhat ■ Very Much COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 31 100% 80% 60% 40 20 0% 100% 89% Population Size and Characteristics Concerned about Antisemitism Around the World 99% 76% 99% 76% In the United States On US College Campuses ■ Any Concern Very Much Concerned 92% 45% In Greater Naples COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 32 Population Size and Characteristics Connections to Israel • 39% of Jews have friends or family in Israel • 80% feel at least a little connected to Israel; 49% feel very much connected • 79% sought news about Israel at least once a month; 20% at least daily • 19% traveled to Israel on a mission sponsored by a Jewish organization; 28% would be interested in one OLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY Once Lived There 3 Past Travel to Israel Never 33 Strengths of the Community "We are very happy with the Jewish community in the way they band together during times of stress." "I have seen Naples go from a community that didn't want to accept Jews to a thriving Jewish community of various religious and civic organizations, because the Jews who were and are here were and are willing to work together for the common good of all Jews." "There is a very healthy relationship between the Naples Jewish community and all other religious affiliations in the greater Naples area." "We have seen the organizations expand and grow to serve the change in population. The people here are wonderful and seem to care about their fellow Jews." MCOLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 34 Gaps in the Community "The community would benefit from more community -wide activities. There are so few Jews here we need to have a better feeling of who we are." "The lack of a single JCC prevents young families and teens from having a single gathering place." "There are many situations regarding meeting the needs for our aging parents and grandparents, [and] those with intellectual challenges, and the need for their long- term living needs as they survive their aging caregivers." "There is no innovative programming in this community." "It would be wonderful if they had people offering to pick people up and take them to events." COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 35 Future Directions • Difficult to project whether community will grow or shrink 0 Dependent on health of extant community, health of local economy, real estate prices throughout Southern Florida, and ability to attract young families 0 Possible indicators: tracking enrollment in Hebrew schools, participation in youth group, older members of the community who move away to be closer to children and grandchildren • Greater outreach to seasonal residents is indicated 0 MCA/WCA are opportunity for engagement • Consider Federation mission to Israel COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY 36 2017 telilhardt ohen. Center Social R"-earch Institute r Modem Jewish SlliC>ies AUV MATTHEW BOXER I MATTHEW A. BROOKNER 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices Table of Contents AppendixA: Methodology............................................................................................................................ 1 Appendix B: Survey Instrument and Codebook.......................................................................................... 13 Appendix C: Study Documentation...........................................................................................................128 AppendixD: Maps..................................................................................................................................... 171 Appendix E: Comparison Charts................................................................................................................ 180 Appendix A: Methodology 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices Overview CMJS developed innovative methods to estimate the size and characteristics of the Collier County Jewish community. As survey techniques have become more refined, the barriers to reaching respondents have become increasingly difficult to overcome. Researchers typically experience limitations in reaching respondents due to the proliferation of survey research, the prevalence of cell phones, and caller ID/blocking. Because the likelihood of reaching someone in the target population depends upon the size of that group relative to the population as a whole, low -incidence populations are particularly hard to reach using the traditional method of random digit dialing (RDD). To address these barriers, CMJS utilized a research design that incorporated two innovations: • Data from an extended sample of email -only respondents • Organizational data to correct for sampling bias The research design for the Collier County Jewish Community Study utilized random sampling from an identified frame, or list, of the known population. The Jewish Federation of Collier County provided membership or mailing lists of some community organizations, while other organizations provided their own lists. These lists were combined with a purchased list of likely Jewish households within the geographic area and were then deduplicated. The combined list constituted the sampling frame from which a primary random sample of households was drawn. Because this primary sample was a random selection from the overall frame, it is assumed to be representative of the entire frame. For that reason, data collected from the random sample were used to estimate overall population characteristics. To supplement the primary random sample, a second sample was drawn from a frame consisting of the remaining households who had an email address. Information from these households increased the amount of data available from populations of interest and allowed for more detailed analysis of the characteristics of the community. The methodology is described as follows: 1. Sampling frame 2. Sample design 3. Survey instrument and data collection 4. Field procedures 5. Weighting 6. Analysis 7. Margin of error 8. Bias and limitations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 2 1. Sampling Frame The 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study implemented a dual -mode Internet and telephone survey to reach year-round and seasonal residents of the Collier County area. In the absence of an area probability or RDD frame, we began to build a sampling frame from the combined mailing lists of Jewish organizations in the area. The names of the organizations included in the lists are shown in Table Al. Toble Al. Composition of strata Number Type Organization 1 Children BBYO Temple Shalom Preschool 2 Synagogue Beth Tikvah of Naples Chabad Jewish Congregation of Marco Island Naples Jewish Congregation Temple Shalom 3 Adults 1 BBYO Friends and Neighbors Hadassah 4 Adults 2 Holocaust Museum Jewish Federation of Collier County 5 Ethnic names/behavior Infogroup Lists from strata 3 and 4 were separated on the basis of expected proportions of ineligible (i.e., out -of -area or non-Jewish) households on the list. Lists with expected low proportions of ineligible households were assigned to stratum 3, and lists with expected high proportions of ineligible households were assigned to stratum 4. In order to find any Jewish -connected households not already known to the organized Jewish community, a list of possible Jewish households was purchased from a commercial data broker, Infogroup, and was added to the sample. This list identified households based on their geography, and then further restricted households to those with Jewish last names, first names, or behavioral characteristics. The "ethnic names/behavior list," consisted of 5,751 households that were identified as likely to include someone who was Hebrew -speaking or Jewish by ethnicity, ethnic group, or religion. Those households that appeared on this list and no organizational list- 5,008 households —represented the "unaffiliated" Jewish community. The organizational and purchased lists were combined, cleaned, and deduplicated to ensure that no unique household appeared on the list more than once. Households without any mailing address were removed from the sampling frame because they could not be fully identified. The combined sampling frame consisted of 11,180 households. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 3 2. Sample Design The households in the sampling frame were divided into five groupings, called strata, based on expected characteristics of the household inferred from the household's appearance on organizational lists. The composition of the five strata is shown in Table A2. Households that appeared on multiple lists were placed in the lowest -number strata for which they were eligible; for example, a household appearing on a synagogue list (stratum 2), an adults 1 list (stratum 3), and the ethnic names/behavior list (stratum 5) would be assigned to stratum 2. Each of the strata was further divided into two sub -strata based on availability of an email address. Households with an email address were eligible to be included in the email -only supplement but households with no email address were not eligible. Therefore, each stratum was subdivided into email and no -email sub -strata. A primary sample of 2,485 potential respondents was randomly selected from the two sub -strata within the five different strata (Table A2). The sampling rate of each stratum was designed to oversample likely Jewish households and likely households with children in order to maximize the representation of those groups within the final sample. Following selection of the sample, an email -only supplement was identified. This sample frame of 2,391 households for the email supplement included all households in the email sub -strata that were not selected into the primary sample. A survey invitation was sent to one email address for each household followed by up to five email reminders. If email messages "bounced" or were undeliverable, another email address from the same household (if available) was substituted. The combination of the primary sample and the email -only supplement is referred to as the "full sample." 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 4 Table A2. Sample size by strata Strata number Description Frame size Primary sample Email -only supple ent 1 Children Total 82 60 6 Email 53 39 No Email 29 21 2 Synagogue Total 1,162 607 465 Email 1,027 544 No Email 135 63 3 Adults 1 Total 694 368 159 Email 377 202 No Email 317 166 4 Adults 2 Total 4,237 763 1,761 Email 2,212 404 No Email 2,025 359 5 Ethnic Names Total 5,008 687 0 Email 0 0 No Email 5,008 687 Total 11,180 2,485 2,391 3. Survey Instrument and Data Collection The survey instrument was designed in collaboration with a special advisory committee of The Jewish Federation of Collier County. The questions were crafted to minimize potential bias and any burden on respondents. Where possible, questions, language, and definitions were adopted from previously published Jewish community survey questionnaires, allowing for greater confidence in their reliability. Two modes of data collection were utilized: online and telephone. The online and telephone instruments were identical —when a survey was completed over the phone, the telephone interviewer would fill out the online version. The questionnaire was divided into two parts, a screener and the survey itself. The screener section was asked of all respondents to determine eligibility. Any household in the sample was considered eligible if it contained at least one adult aged 18 or older who lived in Greater Naples for at least part of the year and considered him- or herself to be Jewish. A total of 1,182 households completed the screener and of those, 936 were screened into the survey. Twenty respondents were initially screened into the survey but after inspection of responses were determined to include no Jewish adults or adults who were Messianic Jews and therefore ineligible for the survey.' Accordingly, the final achieved sample consisted of 916 households. 1 Messianic Jews claim Jewish identity, but their claim is typically rejected by the vast majority of the Jewish community. For purposes of this study, respondents who identified as Messianic Jews were treated as non -Jews. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 5 Qualifying households proceeded to the main survey, which included sections on basic sociodemographic information, engagement in Jewish life, and perceptions of various aspects of Jewish communal life in Collier County. In order to minimize the burden on respondents, a series of complex skip patterns ("branching") were created to ensure that respondents were only asked questions that pertained to their specific life situation or experience. Thus, for example, a household with no children would not be asked questions about choice of schools and camps. The amount of time required to complete the survey varied for all respondents, regardless of mode of completion, depending on household composition and the degree of detail respondents were willing to offer for open-ended questions. The survey instrument is presented in the form of a codebook in Appendix B. 4. Field Procedures Prenotification letters were mailed to the primary sample of 2,485 households on February 8, 2017. These letters explained the purpose of the survey and provided each household with a unique link to complete the survey independently online. Households for which one or more e- mail addresses were available also received these letters electronically on February 13-14, 2017. A sample of the prenotification letter is shown in Appendix C. After two days, households that had not completed the survey were contacted by telephone. The primary goal of telephone contact was to administer the survey over the phone if the respondent was unable or unwilling to complete the survey online, or if the respondent simply preferred to complete the survey over the phone. If the respondent was unwilling to complete the survey over the phone at the time of the call, he or she was asked for a better time to be called again or for an email address to re -send the link to the survey online. Calling began on February 15, 2017, starting with the households for which phone numbers were available. Calling concluded on April 26, 2017. Seven email reminders were sent for all non -completed surveys on February 27, March 9, March 21, March 30, April 6, April 14, and April 20. Calls were conducted by CMJS. Callers were trained in the techniques of telephone interviewing and the specifics of this survey. Callers made up to five attempts to reach all households in the primary sample who did not complete the survey online in response to email requests or who did not have email addresses. Callers offered to conduct survey interviews over the telephone or, if requested, to send the household members their unique link to complete the survey online at their convenience. Households were contacted repeatedly at different days and times to determine whether available contact information was correct. Households whose available contact information was confirmed to be outdated, who had no contact information, and those for whom the status was uncertain were searched in online public records databases to find updated information. Research assistants searched for additional contact information and added phone numbers to the calling list as they were identified. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 6 The supplementary sample was conducted as an email -only survey that was not accompanied by prenotification letters or phone calls. The survey instrument for the email sample was identical to the one used for the primary sample. Email invitations were sent to the 2,391 households in the email supplement for strata 1-4 on February 21, 2017. Five follow-up emails were sent on March 2, March 14, March 24, April 3, and April 20. Data collection ended on May 7, 2017. In the primary sample, 841 households completed the screener; of those, 539 were screened into the full survey. Additionally, 20 households were identified in which all members of the household were deceased, and six households were identified in the course of fielding the survey as previously unrecognized duplicates of other households in the sample. These households were removed from the sample, reducing the primary sample size to 2,459. The overall response rate was 34.2% for the primary sample (AAPOR RR2). In the supplementary sample, 524 households completed the screener; of those, 397 were screened into the full survey. Two households were removed from the supplementary sample after being identified as previously unrecognized duplicates of other households in the sample, reducing the supplementary sample size to 2,389. The overall response rate was 21.9% for the supplementary sample (AAPOR RR2). For the combined primary plus supplementary sample, 1,365 households completed the screener, and of those, 936 were screened into the full survey, yielding an overall response rate of 28.3% (AAPOR RR2). 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 7 Table A3. Response rate by strata for primary sample (AAPOR RR2) Adjusted Primary Deceased primary Complete, Complete, sample or sample screened screened Response Strata size duplicate size in out rate 1 Children 60 0 60 19 5 3 8.3 % 2 Synagogues 607 1 606 295 24 52.6% 3 Adults 1 368 5 363 88 42 35.4% 4 Adults 2 763 10 753 120 113 30.6% 5 Ethnic Names 687 10 677 17 118 19.8% Total 2,485 26 2,459 539 I 302 I 33.9% 5. Weighting Overview of weighting procedures used The purpose of developing survey weights for the sample is to adjust the survey data so that they will represent the population from which they were drawn. This is done in two ways: base weights, which are based on sample design, and poststratification weights, which are adjustments to external benchmarks. For base weights, the data are adjusted to match the sampling frame by calculating the strata - specific probabilities of selection into the sample and rates of response. By adjusting weights upwards for respondents from strata in which households were less likely to be selected or to respond, and adjusting weights downward for respondents from strata in which households were more likely to be selected or to respond, the resulting weights adjust the data to match the frame from which they were drawn. Poststratification, the second phase of weighting, adjusts the data to match known population parameters. In this case, the known parameters that were utilized were the number of children currently enrolled in Jewish pre-schools and part-time schools, and the number of synagogue member units. After applying the base weights, the sample is adjusted again to match these parameters. This step yields the primary sample weights for households and respondents. The weighted primary sample was used to estimate the size of the population for multiple categories of religious identity. Subsequently, the primary sample was combined with the email - only sample to yield the full sample. At the end of the process, a data file was created with one record per adult. In this file, each record has six weights: 1) wthhprim: the weight of the household for the primary sample 2) wthhfull: the weight of the household for the full sample 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 8 3) wtrespprim: the respondent's individual weight for the primary sample (equivalent to the household weight) 4) wtrespfull: the respondent's individual weight for the full sample (equivalent to the household weight) 5) wtindprim: each household adult's individual weight for the primary sample 6) wtindfull: each household adult's individual weight for the full sample Design and base weights Base weights are calculated as the product of the design weight (inverse of the probability of selection into the sample) and the nonresponse weight (inverse of the probability of responding after being selected into the sample). For the primary sample, data were weighted separately within each sub -stratum by the probability of selection into the sample (design weights) and nonresponse. To calculate the design weight, the preliminary frame size was adjusted to account for the presumed ineligibility of a proportion of the households in the sample frame. Ineligible households identified during the data collection period of the survey are those households that are found to be duplicates, deceased, or infirm. The adjusted frame size for each stratum was calculated as: Adjusted frame size = Frame size X (Number eligible households - Number selected households) The design weight for each stratum was calculated as: Design weight = Adjusted frame size - Number eligible households Respondents were those who partially or fully completed the survey. Partial surveys were those in which the screening data were completed (whether the respondent was screened in or out). The nonresponse weight for each stratum was calculated as: Nonresponse weight = Number eligible households - Number respondent households The base weight is calculated by multiplying the design weight by the nonresponse weight: Base weight = Design weight X Nonresponse weight Poststratification and mode effect correction In order to adjust the sample to account for the known population of Jews in the Collier County area, the process of poststratification was used. Jewish institutions in Collier County provided estimates of 70 children in Jewish pre-schools, 170 children in Jewish part-time schools, 815 household member units at five of the six local synagogues, and 1,700 household member units of the Men's and Women's Cultural Alliances. A correction was also applied to correct for mode 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 9 effects, correcting for systematic bias introduced by respondents' propensities to complete the survey by phone or over the Internet. The results of poststratification yielded the primary household weight. Combining the primary and email -only sample To combine the primary and email sample, propensity score weighting was used (Lee & Valliant, 2009).2 This method addressed the concern that respondents who completed the survey based solely on email invitations were more motivated, or had a greater "propensity to respond," than those in the primary sample who received letters, phone calls, and email messages. If that were the case, the email sample would be biased; that is, respondents from the email sample would be likely to be more Jewishly connected than those in the primary sample. The propensity score yields an adjustment factor that is multiplied by the base weight to get the combined weights of the two samples. The base weight for the primary sample was calculated as described above. The base weight of the email sample was set to 1 because all respondents with email addresses had a 100% probability of being selected into the email sample. Propensity score weighting uses logistic regression to determine the probability of responding in the primary sample compared to the email -only sample, based on characteristics that might be correlated with response probability. A logistic regression model was run of the probability of being in either achieved sample based on the following correlated variables: • Respondent being Jewish • Respondent denomination • Having a child • Synagogue member • Ever going to services • Connection to the local Jewish community • Ever been to Israel • Health problems • Intermarried Other variables, including age, gender, and seasonal residency, were tested but were not found to be significant predictors of response probability. After running the model, the response propensities for each respondent were divided into quintiles, and each respondent was assigned to the appropriate quintile, 1 through 5. Within each quintile, an adjustment factor for base weights was calculated using the following formula, following Lee and Valliant (2009, p. 325). 2 Lee, S., & Valliant, R. (2009). Estimation for volunteer panel web surveys using propensity score adjustment and calibration adjustment. Sociological Methods & Research, 37(3), 319-343 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 10 Where f, is the adjustment factor for quintile c within each strata subset NR, is the number of respondents in quintile c in the primary sample (reference) NWT is the number of respondents in quintile c in the email -only sample (web) NR is the number of respondents in the primary sample (reference) NW is the number of respondents in the email -only sample (web) The final weight for each household was the base weight multiplied by the adjustment factor. Individual and respondent weights The individual weights were used to estimate characteristics —but not counts --of the entire adult population (e.g., gender, age, etc.). The data file was converted so there would be one record per adult in each household, duplicating the respondent's record the appropriate number of times. (For example, a household with three adults would have three records.) Each individual's weight was set as the household weight. The respondent's weight was also the household weight, but was labeled as such for simplicity during analysis. 6. Analysis Analyses were conducted of Jewish households (households with at least one Jewish adult), as well as individual Jewish adults and Jewish children who were specifically identified by respondents as being Jewish. All analyses were completed using statistical software Stata, version 14. Analysis of demographic data was based only on the primary random sample with appropriate weights applied. All analyses of attitudinal and behavioral data, as well as all subgroup analysis, were conducted using the full sample with appropriate weights applied. 7. Margin of Error Many studies report a margin of error instead of reporting confidence intervals. The margin of error is the 95% confidence interval that would be expected if all survey respondents had answered a question, if there were only two response choices, if about half gave each response, and if the survey design had used a simple random sample. Additionally, the margin of error is only applicable to percentages, not to totals or means. In our sample, with 539 respondents in the primary sample representing a total population of 8,800 Jewish individuals and 5,250 Jewish households, the margin of error would have been ±4%. However, because the assumptions around a margin of error statistic are violated, this study relies upon the confidence intervals generated individually around each estimate. 8. Bias and Limitations Every effort to create a representative sample was made in order to prevent bias or, where bias was unavoidable, to identify and reduce it. Nevertheless, some groups were particularly likely to 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 11 be underrepresented in the sample. Most significant among these were unaffiliated Jews (including new residents and intermarried families) and young adult Jews. Young adult Jews were also likely undercounted for other reasons. Young adults in general are notoriously difficult to reach for telephone surveys, in part due to the increasing rate of cell phone -only households and in part because they tend to move more frequently than older adults; both conditions render young adults harder to track. Newcomers who are not known to the community were very likely undercounted, though they may have appeared on the ethnic names list. Given the high rates of seasonal residency in Collier County, this is made all the more difficult —some households spend as little as one or two months in the area each year, and as such may not be on the radar of local Jewish organizations. Interfaith families may also been underrepresented to the extent that they were unaffiliated and resided in households with directory listings that did not fit the selected ethnic name parameters. Economically disadvantaged families may have been underrepresented due to lack of affiliation. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 12 Appendix B: Survey Instrument and Codebook 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 13 Thursday July 13 12:12:53 2017 Page 1 _ (R) Statistics/Data Analysis name: <unnamed> log: Z:\Naples - Collier County\Report\6-Codebook & Instrument\Codebook - scrlive.smcl log type: smcl opened on: 13 Jul 2017, 12:10:41 2 . 3 *Screener 4 . 6 note 1 scrlive scrlive: 1. Do you live in the Greater Naples area for any part of the year? 7 . tab scrlive Screener: Live in Naples Freq. Percent Cum. No 139 10.71 10.71 Yes 1,159 89.29 100.00 Total 1,298 100.00 8 . log close name: <unnamed> log: Z:\Naples - Collier County\Report\6-Codebook & instrument\Codebook - scrlive.smcl log type: smcl closed on: 13 Jul 2017, 12:10:52 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 14 What is the ZIP code of your Greater Naples address? Response Unweighted n 33901 < 10 33908 < 10 33912 < 10 33913 < 10 33914 < 10 33919 < 10 33928 38 33957 < 10 33967 < 10 34102 22 34103 46 34104 21 34105 62 34106 < 10 34108 148 34109 110 34110 93 34112 25 34113 23 34114 40 34116 < 10 34117 < 10 34119 132 34120 31 34134 36 34135 47 34142 < 10 34143 < 10 34145 53 Out of Area 200 Total 1,155 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 15 Tuesday September 12 09:37:23 2017 Page 1 _ (R) Statistics/Data Analysis HH Jewish Freq. Percent Cum. name: <unnamed> log: Z:\Naples - Collier County\Report\6-Codebook & Instrument\Codebook - Frequencies.smcl log type: smcl opened on: 12 Sep 2017, 09:35:48 1 . 2 . ********* 3 *Screener (cont.) 4 ********* 5 foreach x of varlist scrconjew scrparjew { 2. note 1 'x' 3. tab 'x' 4. } scrconjew: 1. Do you or any other adult in your household consider themselves to be Jewish? Screener: Anyone in HH Jewish Freq. Percent Cum. No 251 21.73 21.73 Yes 904 78.27 100.00 Total 1,155 100.00 scrparjew: 1. Do you or any adult in your household have a Jewish parent or were raised Jewish? Screener: Anyone in HH Jewish parent Freq. Percent Cum. No 233 92.83 92.83 Yes 18 7.17 100.00 Total 251 100.00 6 . 8 *Household Counts 9 ********* 10 foreach x of varlist hhadnum hhchnum { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy: tab 'x', per format (o20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. } hhadnum: 1. How many adults (age 18 or older) usually live in your household -- including yourself? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 905 Number of PSUs = 905 Population size = 5,516.0994 Design df = 896 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 16 Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 2 Count HH adults percentage obs 1 23 180 2 75 691 3 1 25 4 1 8 5 0 1 Total 100 905 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhchnum: 1. How many children (age 17 or younger) usually live in your household? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 906 Number of PSUs = 906 Population size = 5,527.7176 Design df = 897 Count HH children percentage obs 0 93 835 1 1 17 2 4 33 3 1 16 4 0 4 5 0 1 Total 100 906 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 11 . 12 . ********* 13 *Respondent 14 ********* 15 16 foreach x of varlist respgender respage_dec respedu respdenom respdaysch respptsch respcamp respyg resp 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(respjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. 1 (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 894 Number of PSUs = 894 Population size = 5,368.4799 Subpop. no. obs = 892 Subpop. size = 5,360.2976 Design df = 885 R gender percentage obs Male 54 411 Female 46 481 Total 100 892 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 17 Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 3 respage_dec: 1. How old are you? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 872 Number of PSUs = 872 Population size = 5,304.9208 Subpop. no. obs = 870 Subpop. size = 5,296.7384 Design df = 863 RECODE of respage (R age) percentage obs 20-29 yrs 0 5 30-39 yrs 2 15 40-49 yrs 4 39 50-59 yrs 6 63 60-69 yrs 21 218 70-79 yrs 44 363 80-89 yrs 19 158 90+ yrs 4 9 Total 100 870 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations respedu: 1. What is the highest level of schooling you have completed? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 868 Number of PSUs = 868 Population size = 5,296.7531 Subpop. no. obs = 866 Subpop. size = 5,288.5708 Design df = 859 R highest schooling percentage obs Less than high school 0 1 High school 1 6 Some college or technical degr 10 63 Associate or technical degree 3 23 Bachelor's degree 30 264 Master's degree 30 278 Doctorate or professional degr 25 226 Other 0 5 Total 100 866 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 893 Number of PSUs = 893 Population size = 5,355.8998 Subpop. no. obs = 891 Subpop. size = 5,347.7175 Design df = 884 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 18 Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 4 R denomination percentage obs Orthodox 3 36 Conservative 23 240 Reconstructionist 1 9 Reform 49 477 Renewal 0 2 Secular/Cultural 14 76 Just Jewish 8 44 Other 3 7 Total 100 891 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations respdaysch: 1. [During grades K-12, did you ever do any of the following?] Attend a Jewish day school (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 847 Number of PSUs = 847 Population size = 5,220.4805 Subpop. no. obs = 845 Subpop. size = 5,212.2982 Design df = 838 R went to day school percentage obs No 84 746 Yes 16 99 Total 100 845 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations respptsch: 1. [During grades K-12, did you ever do any of the following?] Attend a supplementary Jewish school, 1 (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 851 Number of PSUs = 851 Population size = 5,240.2773 Subpop. no. obs = 849 Subpop. size = 5,232.095 Design df = 842 R went to part-time school percentage obs No 22 165 Yes 78 684 Total 100 849 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations respcamp: 1. [During grades K-12, did you ever do any of the following?] Attend a Jewish day or overnight camp (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 19 Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 5 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 847 Number of PSUs = 847 Population size = 5,185.3346 Subpop. no. obs = 845 Subpop. size = 5,177.1523 Design df = 838 R went to Jewish camp percentage obs No 63 493 Yes 37 352 Total 100 845 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations respyg: 1. [During grades K-12, did you ever do any of the following?] Participate in a Jewish youth group (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 846 Number of PSUs = 846 Population size = 5,217.8474 Subpop. no. obs = 844 Subpop. size = 5,209.6651 Design df = 837 R was in youth group percentage obs No 53 371 Yes 47 473 Total 100 844 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 861 Number of PSUs = 861 Population size = 5,273.0066 Subpop. no. obs = 859 Subpop. size = 5,264.8243 Design df = 852 R had bar/bat mitzvah percentage obs No 40 328 Yes, as a child 55 466 Yes, as an adult 4 65 Total 100 859 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 20 Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 6 17 . 18 . di "All Respondents" All Respondents 19 . foreach x of varlist resprelig respcons resppar resprelrsd respconvert { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy: tab 'x', per format(%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. ) (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 890 Number of PSUs = 890 Population size = 5,353.896 Design df = 881 R religion percentage obs Jewish 94 868 Jewish + Else 1 11 Christian 0 1 Buddhist 0 1 Atheist 1 6 Agnostic 3 2 Other 1 1 Total 100 890 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations respcons: 1. Aside from religion, do you consider yourself Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs - 15 Number of PSUs = 15 Population size = 255.827075 Design df = 10 R consider self Jewish percentage obs Yes 100 15 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. resppar: 1. Were either of your parents Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of PSUs = 886 Number of obs = 886 Population size 5,342.7172 Design df = 877 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 21 Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 7 R's parents Jewish percentage obs No 1 26 Yes, mother 2 18 Yes, father 6 20 Yes, mother and father 90 822 Total 100 886 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations resprelrsd: 1. Were you raised... (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 881 Number of PSUs = 881 Population size = 5,286.5165 Design df = 872 R religion raised percentage obs Jewish 93 831 Jewish and something else 1 7 Another religion 4 25 No religion 2 18 Total 100 881 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations respconvert: 1. Did you have a formal conversion to Judaism? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 25 Number of PSUs = 25 Population size = 70.2424108 Design df = 21 R converted percentage obs No 4 1 Yes 96 24 Total 100 25 Key: percentage cell percentage obs = number of observations 20 . 21 . foreach x of varlist respgender_oth resprelig_joth respreslig_oth respdenom_oth { 2. note 1 'x' 3. count if 'x'!=" & respjewish==1 4. } respgender oth: 1. What is your gender? 1 resprelig_joth: 1. What is your religion, if any? 8 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 22 Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 8 respreslig_oth: 1. What is your religion, if any? 1 respdenom_oth: 1. With which branch of Judaism do you currently identify, if any? 13 22 23 ********* 24 *Adult 2 25 ********* 26 . 27 foreach x of varlist hhadrlt2 hhadgender2 hhadage2_dec hhadhs2 hhadrelig2 > d2 jedovcad2 jedbbyoad2 jedisrad2 { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. 1 hhadrlt2: 1. Adult2 What is your relationship to this adult? (running tabulate on estimation sample) hhadcons2 hhadpar2 hhadre Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 711 Number of PSUs = 711 Population size = 4,100.6744 Subpop. no. obs = 711 Subpop. size = 4,100.6744 Design df = 702 Adult relationship 2 percentage obs Your spouse 91 664 Your adult child 1 13 Your stepchild 4 2 Your parent 0 4 Your sibling 0 3 Your fiance/e 1 4 Your significant other or part 1 20 Your other relative 0 1 Total 100 711 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadgender2: 1. Adult2 What is this adult's gender? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 708 Number of PSUs = 708 Population size = 4,042.2149 Subpop. no. obs = 708 Subpop. size = 4,042.2149 Design df = 699 Adult gender 2 percentage obs Male 44 341 Female 56 367 Total 100 708 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 23 Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 9 hhadage2_dec: 1. Adult2 What is {his/her/their+ age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 694 Number of PSUs = 694 Population size = 3,999.1735 Subpop. no. obs = 694 Subpop. size = 3,999.1735 Design df = 685 RECODE of hhadage2 (Adult age 2) percentage obs 18-19 yrs 0 1 20-29 yrs 0 5 30-39 yrs 2 9 40-49 yrs 5 39 50-59 yrs 11 57 60-69 yrs 28 186 70-79 yrs 41 306 80-89 yrs 12 87 90+ yrs 0 4 Total 100 694 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadhs2: 1. Adult2 fIs/Are} fhe/she/they} currently enrolled in high school? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 17 Number of PSUs = 17 Population size 91.0092415 Subpop. no. obs = 17 Subpop. size = 91.0092415 Design df = 13 Adult high school 2 percentage obs No 96 16 Yes 4 1 Total 100 17 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadrelig2: 1. Adult2 What is {his/her/their} religion? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 708 Number of PSUs = 708 Population size = 4,095.4483 Subpop. no. obs = 708 Subpop. size = 4,095.4483 Design df = 699 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 24 Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 10 Adult religion 2 percentage obs Jewish 74 591 Jewish + Else 1 7 Christian 12 67 Buddhist 0 2 Hindu 0 1 Muslim 0 1 Atheist 8 12 Agnostic 1 8 Other 3 19 Total 100 708 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadcons2: 1. Adult2 Aside from religion, {does/dol fhe/she/they} consider +himself/themselves} Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 106 Number of PSUs = 106 Population size = 979.217159 Subpop. no. obs = 106 Subpop. size = 979.217159 Design df = 98 Adult consider Jewish 2 percentage obs No 93 92 Yes 7 14 Total 100 106 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadpar2: 1. Adult2 Were either of {his/her/theirl parents Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 706 Number of PSUs = 706 Population size = 4,085.8842 Subpop. no. obs = 706 Subpop. size = 4,085.8842 Design df = 697 Adult parents Jewish 2 percentage obs No 34 162 Yes, mother 1 5 Yes, father 2 15 Yes, mother and father 64 524 Total 100 706 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadrelrsd2: 1. Adult2 In what religion (was/were) {he/she/theyl raised? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 25 Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 11 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 706 Number of PSUs = 706 Population size = 4,078.9151 Subpop. no. obs = 706 Subpop. size = 4,078.9151 Design df = 697 Adult religion raised 2 percentage obs Jewish 65 531 Jewish and something else 0 3 Another religion 31 141 No religion 4 31 Total 100 706 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadconvert2: 1. Adult2 Did fhe/she/they} have a formal conversion to Judaism? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 7 Number of obs = 56 Number of PSUs = 56 Population size = 394.975634 Subpop. no. obs = 56 Subpop. size = 394.975634 Design df = 49 Adult converted 2 percentage obs No 8 5 Yes 92 51 Total 100 56 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhaddenom2: 1. Adult2 With which branch of Judaism (does/do} fhe/she/they) identify, if any? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 612 Number of PSUs = 612 Population size = 3,137.6474 Subpop. no. obs = 612 Subpop. size = 3,137.6474 Design df = 603 Adult denomination 2 percentage obs Orthodox 5 29 Conservative 26 180 Reconstructionist 1 4 Reform 50 314 Renewal 0 2 Secular/Cultural 11 45 Just Jewish 8 38 Total 100 612 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 26 Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 12 jedptad2: 1. Adult2 In part-time school? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 3.36721325 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 3.36721325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] Part -Time Adult 2 percentage obs No 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jeddycad2: 1. Adult2 In day camp? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 3.36721325 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 3.36721325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] Day Camp Adult 2 percentage obs No 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedovcad2: 1. Adult2 In overnight camp? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 3.36721325 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 3,36721325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] Ovn Camp Adult 2 percentage obs No 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedbbyoad2: 1. Adult2 In BBYO? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 27 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 13 Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size = 3.36721325 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 3.36721325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] BBYO Adult 2 percentage obs No 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedisrad2: 1. Adult2 Done Israel trip? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 3.36721325 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 3.36721325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] Isr Trip Adult 2 percentage obs No 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 28 . 29 . foreach x of varlist hhadrlt2_oth hhadrelig2_joth hhadrelig2_oth hhadrelrsd2_joth hhadrelrsd2_oth hhadd 2. note 1 'x' 3. count if 'x'!=" & hhjewish==1 4. 1 hhadrlt2_oth: 1. Adult2 What is your relationship to this adult? 2 hhadrelig2_joth: 1. Adult2 What is {his/her/theirl religion? 5 hhadrelig2_oth: 1. Adult2 What is {his/her/theirl religion? 17 hhadrelrsd2_joth: 1. Adult2 In what religion (was/were) {he/she/theyl raised? 3 hhadrelrsd2_oth: 1. Adult2 In what religion (was/were) {he/she/theyl raised? 135 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 28 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 14 hhaddenom2_oth: 1. Adult2 With which branch of Judaism {does/dol {he/she/theyl identify, if any? 2 30 . 31 ********* 32 *Adult 3 33 ********* 34 . 35 foreach x of varlist hhadrlt3 hhadgender3 hhadage3dec hhadhs3 hhadrelig3 > jedbbyoad3 jedisrad3 { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. 1 hhadrlt3: 1. Adult3 What is your relationship to this adult? (running tabulate on estimation sample) hhadcons3 hhadpar3 hhadre Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 33 Number of PSUs = 33 Population size = 107.33855 Subpop. no. obs = 33 Subpop. size = 107.33855 Design df = 27 Adult relationship 3 percentage obs Your adult child 72 25 Your parent 9 3 Your child -in-law 11 1 Your sibling 5 3 Your other relative 3 1 Total 100 33 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadgender3: 1. Adult3 What is this adult's gender? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = Number of PSUs = 33 Population size - Subpop. no. obs = Subpop. size = Design df = Adult gender 3 percentage obs Male 52 18 Female 47 14 Something not listed here 1 1 Total 100 33 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadage3_dec: 1. Adult3 What is {his/her/their} age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 33 107.33855 33 107.33855 27 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 29 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 15 Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 33 Number of PSUs = 33 Population size = 107.33855 Subpop. no. obs = 33 Subpop. size = 107.33855 Design df = 27 RECODE of hhadage3 (Adult age 3) percentage obs 18-19 yrs 17 6 20-29 yrs 46 16 30-39 yrs 2 2 40-49 yrs 3 1 50-59 yrs 14 4 60-69 yrs 11 2 70-79 yrs 3 1 80-89 yrs 3 1 Total 100 33 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadhs3: 1. Adult3 {Is/Are} fhe/she/they} currently enrolled in high school? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 10 Number of PSUs = 10 Population size = 28.1019951 Subpop. no. obs = 10 Subpop. size = 28.1019951 Design df = 8 Adult high school 3 percentage obs No 69 7 Yes 31 3 Total 100 10 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadrelig3: 1. Adult3 What is {his/her/their} religion? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 32 Number of PSUs = 32 Population size = 103.971337 Subpop. no. obs = 32 Subpop. size = 103.971337 Design df = 26 Adult religion 3 percentage obs Jewish 86 30 Jewish + Else 3 1 Christian 11 1 Total 100 32 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 30 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 16 hhadcons3: 1. Adult3 Aside from religion, (does/do) fhe/she/they} consider {himself/themselves) Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size = 11.6182041 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 11.6182041 Design df = 0 Adult consider Jewish 3 percentage obs No 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hhadpar3: 1. Adult3 Were either of this/her/their) parents Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 33 Number of PSUs = 33 Population size = 107.33855 Subpop. no. obs = 33 Subpop. size = 107.33855 Design df = 27 Adult parents Jewish 3 percentage obs No 11 1 Yes, mother 21 6 Yes, father 7 3 Yes, mother and father 62 23 Total 100 33 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadrelrsd3: 1. Adult3 In what religion (was/were) fhe/she/they) raised? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 33 Number of PSUs = 33 Population size = 107.33855 Subpop. no. obs = 33 Subpop. size = 107.33855 Design df = 27 Adult religion raised 3 percentage obs Jewish 82 29 Jewish and something else 4 2 Another religion 11 1 No religion 3 1 Total 100 33 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 31 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 17 hhaddenom3: 1. Adult3 With which branch of Judaism (does/do] fhe/she/they) identify, if any? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 31 Number of PSUs = 31 Population size = 92.353133 Subpop. no. obs = 31 Subpop. size = 92.353133 Design df = 25 Adult denomination 3 percentage obs Orthodox 7 2 Conservative 17 4 Reform 51 15 Secular/Cultural 12 4 Just Jewish 13 6 Total 100 31 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedptad3: 1. Adult3 In part-time school? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs - 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size = 8.65389252 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 8.65389252 Design df = 1 [JewEd] Part -Time Adult 3 percentage obs No 100 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jeddycad3: 1. Adult3 In day camp? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of PSUs = 3 3 Number of obs = 3 Population size = 8.65389252 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 8.65389252 Design df = 1 [JewEd] Day Camp Adult 3 percentage obs No 100 3 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs - number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 32 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 18 jedovcad3: 1. Adult3 In overnight camp? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of PSUs = 3 Number of obs = 3 Population size = 8.65389252 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 8.65389252 Design df = 1 [JewEd] Ovn Camp Adult 3 percentage obs No 100 3 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedbbyoad3: 1. Adult3 In BBYO? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of PSUs = 3 Number of obs = 3 Population size = 8.65389252 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 8.65389252 Design df = 1 [JewEd] BBYO Adult 3 percentage obs No 52 Yes 48 Total 100 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedisrad3: 1. Adult3 Done Israel trip? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of PSUs = 3 2 1 3 Number of obs = 3 Population size = 8.65389252 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 8,65389252 Design df = 1 [JewEd] Isr Trip Adult 3 percentage obs No 100 3 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 33 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 19 36 . 37 . foreach x of varlist hhadrelig3_joth hhadrelrsd3_joth hhadrelrsd3_oth { 2. note 1 'x' 3. count if 'x'!=" & hhjewish==1 4. ) hhadrelig3_joth: 1. Adult3 What is {his/her/their} religion? 1 hhadrelrsd3_joth: 1. Adult3 In what religion (was/were) {he/she/they} raised? 2 hhadrelrsd3_oth: 1. Adult3 In what religion (was/were) {he/she/they) raised? 1 38 . 39 ********* 40 *Adult 4 41 ********* 42 43 foreach x of varlist hhadrlt4 hhadgender4 hhadage4_dec hhadhs4 hhadrelig4 > jedbbyoad4 jedisrad4 { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. ) hhadrlt4: 1. Adult4 What is your relationship to this adult? (running tabulate on estimation sample) hhadcons4 hhadpar4 hhadre Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size 32.947211 Subpop. no. obs = 9 Subpop. size = 32.947211 Design df = 4 Adult relationship 4 percentage obs Your adult child 80 7 Your parent 10 1 Your other relative 10 1 Total 100 9 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadgender4: 1. Adult4 What is this adult's gender? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size = 32.947211 Subpop. no. obs = 9 Subpop. size = 32.947211 Design df = 4 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 34 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 20 Adult gender 4 percentage obs Male 56 4 Female 44 5 Total 100 9 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadage4_dec: 1. Adult4 What is {his/her/their) age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size = 32.947211 Subpop. no. obs = 9 Subpop. size = 32.947211 Design df = 4 RECODE of hhadage4 (Adult age 4) percentage obs 18-19 yrs 46 5 20-29 yrs 18 2 50-59 yrs 26 1 60-69 yrs 10 1 Total 100 9 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadhs4: 1. Adult4 {Is/Are} fhe/she/they} currently enrolled in high school? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 6 Number of PSUs = 6 Population size = 18.3366001 Subpop. no. obs = 6 Subpop. size = 18.3366001 Design df = 2 Adult high school 4 percentage obs No 63 4 Yes 37 2 Total 100 6 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs number of observations hhadrelig4: 1. Adult4 What is (his/her/theirl religion? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size = 32.947211 Subpop. no. obs = 9 Subpop. size = 32.947211 Design df = 4 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 35 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 21 Adult religion 4 percentage obs Jewish 90 8 Agnostic 10 1 Total 100 9 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadcons4: 1. Adult4 Aside from religion, {does/dol fhe/she/they} consider {himself/themselves) Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size = 3.36721325 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 3.36721325 Design df = 0 Adult consider Jewish 4 percentage obs Yes 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hhadpar4: 1. Adult4 Were either of {his/her/theirl parents Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size = 32.947211 Subpop. no. obs = 9 Subpop. size = 32.947211 Design df = 4 Adult parents Jewish 4 percentage obs Yes, mother 3 1 Yes, father 10 1 Yes, mother and father 86 7 Total 100 9 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhadrelrsd4: 1. Adult4 In what religion (was/were) {he/she/theyl raised? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size = 32.947211 Subpop. no. obs = 9 Subpop. size = 32.947211 Design df = 4 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 36 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 22 Adult religion raised 4 percentage obs Jewish 90 8 No religion 10 1 Total 100 9 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhaddenom4: 1. Adult4 With which branch of Judaism (does/do} fhe/she/they} identify, if any? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size = 32.947211 Subpop. no. obs = 9 Subpop. size = 32.947211 Design df = 4 Adult denomination 4 percentage obs Orthodox 10 Conservative 44 Reform 43 Just Jewish 3 Total 100 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedptad4: 1. Adult4 In part-time school? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 2 1 3 4 1 9 Number of obs = 2 Population size = 6.7344265 Subpop. no. obs = 2 Subpop. size = 6.7344265 Design df = 1 [JewEd] Part -Time Adult 4 percentage obs No 100 2 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jeddycad4: 1. Adult4 In day camp? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 2 Number of obs = 2 Population size - 6.7344265 Subpop. no. obs = 2 Subpop. size = 6.7344265 Design df = 1 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 37 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 23 [JewEd] Day Camp Adult 4 percentage obs No 100 2 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedovcad4: 1. Adult4 In overnight camp? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 2 Number of obs = 2 Population size = 6.7344265 Subpop. no. obs = 2 Subpop. size = 6.7344265 Design df = 1 [JewEd] Ovn Camp Adult 4 percentage obs No 100 2 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedbbyoad4: 1. Adult4 In BBYO? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 2 Number of obs = 2 Population size = 6.7344265 Subpop. no. obs = 2 Subpop. size = 6.7344265 Design df = 1 [JewEd] BBYO Adult 4 percentage obs No 100 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedisrad4: 1. Adult4 Done Israel trip? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 2 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 3.36721325 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 3.36721325 Design df = 0 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 38 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 24 [JewEd] Isr Trip Adult 4 percentage obs No 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 44 . 45 . 46 ********* 47 *Adult 5 48 ********* 49 . 50 foreach x of varlist hhadrlt5 hhadgender5 hhadage5_dec hhadhs5 hhadrelig5 hhadpar5 hhadrelrsd5 hhaddeno 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab 'x', per format (o20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. ] hhadrlt5: 1. Adult5 What is your relationship to this adult? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size = 2.72744274 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 2.72744274 Design df = 0 Adult relationship 5 percentage obs Your adult child 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hhadgender5: 1. Adult5 What is this adult's gender? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 2.72744274 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 2.72744274 Design df = 0 Adult gender 5 percentage obs Female 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 39 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 25 hhadage5_dec: 1. Adult5 What is (his/her/theirl age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 2.72744274 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 2.72744274 Design df = 0 RECODE of hhadage5 (Adult age 5) percentage obs 18-19 yrs 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hhadhs5: 1. Adult5 (Is/Arel fhe/she/theyl currently enrolled in high school? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size = 2.72744274 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 2.72744274 Design df = 0 Adult high school 5 percentage obs No 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hhadrelig5: 1. Adult5 What is (his/her/theirl religion? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 2.72744274 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 2.72744274 Design df = 0 Adult religion 5 percentage obs Jewish 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 40 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 26 hhadpar5: 1. Adult5 Were either of {his/her/theirl parents Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size = 2.72744274 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 2.72744274 Design df = 0 Adult parents Jewish 5 percentage obs Yes, mother and father 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hhadrelrsd5: 1. Adult5 In what religion (was/were) fhe/she/theyl raised? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size = 2.72744274 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 2.72744274 Design df = 0 Adult religion raised 5 percentage obs Jewish 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hhaddenom5: 1. Adult5 With which branch of Judaism (does/dol fhe/she/theyl identify, if any? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size = 2.72744274 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 2.72744274 Design df = 0 Adult denomination 5 percentage obs Conservative 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 41 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 27 51 . 52 53 ********* 54 *Child 1 55 ********* 56 . 57 foreach x of varlist hhchage 1 hhchgrdl hhchgenderl hhchrltl hhchrelrsdl hhchrelsame hhchbarbatl jedjpk > d68dycl jed68ovcl jed68mspl jed912ptl jed912dycl jed912ovcl jed9l2bbyol jedothptl jedothdycl jedothovcl 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. } hhchage_l: 1. Childl What is {his/her/their) age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 66 Number of PSUs = 66 Population size = 346.697324 Subpop. no. obs = 66 Subpop. size = 346.697324 Design df = 60 RECODE of hhchagel (Child age 1) percentage obs 0-5 21 9 7-12 41 24 13-17 38 33 Total 100 66 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhchgrdl: 1. Childl What grade was (he/she/this child) in during the 2016-17 school year? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 65 Number of PSUs = 65 Population size = 344.449944 Subpop. no. obs = 65 Subpop. size = 344.449944 Design df = 59 Child grade 1 percentage obs Not yet in kindergarten 21 9 K-5 33 20 6-8 16 it 9-12 29 24 Other 1 1 Total 100 65 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhchgenderl: 1. Childl Is this child... (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 42 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 28 Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 63 Number of PSUs = 63 Population size = 333.304467 Subpop. no. obs = 63 Subpop. size = 333.304467 Design df = 57 Child gender 1 percentage obs Male 51 33 Female 49 30 Total 100 63 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhchrltl: 1. Childl What is your relationship to {him/her/this child}? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 60 Number of PSUs = 60 Population size = 320.499857 Subpop. no. obs = 60 Subpop. size = 320.499857 Design df = 54 Child relationship 1 percentage obs Your child 98 58 Your grandchild 2 2 Total 100 60 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhchrelrsdl: 1. Childl Is this child being raised... (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 66 Number of PSUs = 66 Population size = 336.957528 Subpop. no. obs = 66 Subpop. size = 336.957528 Design df = 60 Child religion 1 percentage obs Jewish by religion 67 52 Culturally Jewish it 8 Jewish + Another 10 4 Another religion 9 1 No religion 3 1 Total 100 66 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhchrelsame: 1. In terms of religion, are all of the children in the household being raised in the same way? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 43 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 29 Number of strata = 6 Number of PSUs = 49 Number of obs = 49 Population size = 272.501549 Subpop. no. obs = 49 Subpop. size = 272.501549 Design df = 43 All children raised same religion percentage obs Yes 100 49 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hhchbarbatl: 1. Childl Did this child have a Bar or Bat Mitzvah? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 27 Number of PSUs = 27 Population size = 97.3693165 Subpop. no. obs = 27 Subpop. size = 97.3693165 Design df = 21 Child bar/bat mitzvah 1 percentage obs No 11 2 Yes 89 25 Total 100 27 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedjpkl: 1. Childl In Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size - 73.9124619 Subpop. no. obs = 9 Subpop. size = 73.9124619 Design df = 6 [JewEd] J Pre-K Child 1 percentage obs No 22 2 Yes 78 7 Total 100 9 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedpkl: 1. Childl In non-Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 44 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 30 Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size = 73.9124619 Subpop. no. obs = 9 Subpop. size = 73.9124619 Design df = 6 [JewEd] NJ Pre-K Child 1 percentage obs No 78 7 Yes 22 2 Total 100 9 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedk5ptl: 1. Childl In part-time school, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 20 Number of PSUs = 20 Population size = 113.437791 Subpop. no. obs = 20 Subpop. size = 113.437791 Design df = 16 [JewEd] K5 Part -Time Child 1 percentage obs No 61 4 Yes 39 16 Total 100 20 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedk5dycl: 1. Childl In day camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 20 Number of PSUs = 20 Population size = 113.437791 Subpop. no. obs = 20 Subpop. size = 113.437791 Design df = 16 [JewEd] K5 Day Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 100 20 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedk5ovcl: 1. Childl In overnight camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 45 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 31 Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 20 Number of PSUs = 20 Population size = 113.437791 Subpop. no. obs = 20 Subpop. size = 113.437791 Design df = 16 [JewEd] K5 Ovn Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 87 17 Yes 13 3 Total 100 20 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jed68ptl: 1. Childl In part-time school, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 11 Number of PSUs = 11 Population size = 54.4061188 Subpop. no. obs = 11 Subpop. size = 54.4061188 Design df = 8 [JewEd] 68 Part -Time Child 1 percentage obs No 54 5 Yes 46 6 Total 100 11 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jed68dycl: 1. Childl In day camp, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 11 Number of PSUs = 11 Population size = 54.4061188 Subpop. no. obs = 11 Subpop. size = 54.4061188 Design df = 8 [JewEd] 68 Day Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 95 10 Yes 5 1 Total 100 11 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jed68ovcl: 1. Childl In overnight camp, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 46 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 32 Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 11 Number of PSUs = 11 Population size = 54.4061188 Subpop. no. obs = 11 Subpop. size = 54.4061188 Design df = 8 [JewEd] 68 Ovn Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 85 8 Yes 15 3 Total 100 11 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jed68mspl: 1. Childl In MSP, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 11 Number of PSUs = 11 Population size = 54.4061188 Subpop. no. obs = 11 Subpop. size = 54.4061188 Design df = 8 [JewEd] 68 MSP Child 1 percentage obs No 88 9 Yes 12 2 Total 100 11 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jed912ptl: 1. Childl In part-time school, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs - 24 Number of PSUs = 24 Population size = 99.3263588 Subpop. no. obs = 24 Subpop. size = 99.3263588 Design df = 19 [JewEd] 912 Part -Time Child 1 percentage obs No 60 11 Yes 40 13 Total 100 24 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jed912dycl: 1. Childl In day camp, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 47 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 33 Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 24 Number of PSUs = 24 Population size = 99.3263588 Subpop. no. obs = 24 Subpop. size = 99.3263588 Design df = 19 [JewEd] 912 Day Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 78 19 Yes 22 5 Total 100 24 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jed912ovcl: 1. Childl In overnight camp, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 24 Number of PSUs = 24 Population size = 99.3263588 Subpop. no. obs = 24 Subpop. size = 99.3263588 Design df = 19 [JewEd] 912 Ovn Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 73 16 Yes 27 8 Total 100 24 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jed912bbyol: 1. Childl In BBYO, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs - 24 Number of PSUs = 24 Population size = 99.3263588 Subpop. no. obs = 24 Subpop. size = 99.3263588 Design df = 19 [JewEd] 912 BBYO Child 1 percentage obs No 56 12 Yes 44 12 Total 100 24 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedothptl: 1. Childl In part-time school, other? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 48 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 34 Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size = 3.36721325 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 3.36721325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] oth Part -Time Child 1 percentage obs Yes 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedothdycl: 1. Childl In day camp, other? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 3.36721325 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 3.36721325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] oth Day Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedothovcl: 1. Childl In overnight camp, other? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 3.36721325 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 3,36721325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] oth Ovn Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedothmspl: 1. Childl In MSP, other? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 49 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 35 Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size = 3.36721325 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 3.36721325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] oth MSP Child 1 percentage obs No 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedothbbyol: 1. Childl In BBYO, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 3.36721325 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 3.36721325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] oth BBYO Child 1 percentage obs Yes 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedisrl: 1. Childl Done Israel trip, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of PSUs = 22 Number of obs = 22 Population size = 85.1828604 Subpop. no. obs = 22 Subpop. size = 85.1828604 Design df = 17 [JewEd] Isr Trip Child 1 percentage obs No 83 20 Yes 17 2 Total 100 22 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 50 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 36 58 . 59 . foreach x of varlist hhchrelrsdl_oth hhchrelrsdl_joth { 2. note 1 'x' 3. count if 'x'!=" & hhjewish==1 4. } hhchrelrsdl_oth: 1. Childl Is this child being raised... 1 hhchrelrsdl_joth: 1. Childl Is this child being raised... 4 60 . 61 ********* 62 *Child 2 63 ********* 64 . 65 foreach x of varlist hhchage_2 hhchgrd2 hhchgender2 hhchrlt2 hhchbarbat2 jedjpk2 jedpk2 jedk5pt2 jedk5d > sp2 jed912pt2 jed912dyc2 jed912ovc2 jed912bbyo2 jedisr2 { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. ) hhchage_2: 1. Child2 What is {his/her/their} age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 47 Number of PSUs = 47 Population size = 270.456098 Subpop. no. obs = 47 Subpop. size = 270.456098 Design df = 41 RECODE of hhchage2 (Child age 2) percentage obs 0-5 21 4 7-12 24 18 13-17 54 25 Total 100 47 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhchgrd2: 1. Child2 What grade was {he/she/this child) in during the 2016-17 school year? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 46 Number of PSUs = 46 Population size = 268.208718 Subpop. no. obs = 46 Subpop. size = 268.208718 Design df = 41 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 51 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 37 Child grade 2 percentage obs Not yet in kindergarten 20 3 K-5 24 17 6-8 34 14 9-12 22 12 Total 100 46 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhchgender2: 1. Child2 Is this child... (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 44 Number of PSUs = 44 Population size = 264.444786 Subpop. no. obs = 44 Subpop. size = 264.444786 Design df = 39 Child gender 2 percentage obs Male 64 24 Female 36 20 Total 100 44 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhchrlt2: 1. Child2 What is your relationship to {him/her/this child}? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 41 Number of PSUs = 41 Population size = 241.058461 Subpop. no. obs = 41 Subpop. size = 241.058461 Design df = 36 Child relationship 2 percentage obs Your child 100 41 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hhchbarbat2: 1. Child2 Did this child have a Bar or Bat Mitzvah? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 19 Number of PSUs = 19 Population size - 106.687809 Subpop. no. obs = 19 Subpop. size = 106.687809 Design df = 15 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 52 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 38 Child bar/bat mitzvah 2 percentage obs No 57 4 Yes 38 13 Will have one in the future 5 2 Total 100 19 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedjpk2: 1. Child2 In Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size = 54.8220044 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 54.8220044 Design df = 1 [JewEd] J Pre-K Child 2 percentage obs No 2 1 Yes 98 2 Total 100 3 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedpk2: 1. Child2 In non-Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size = 54.8220044 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 54.8220044 Design df = 1 [JewEd] NJ Pre-K Child 2 percentage obs No 100 3 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedk5pt2: 1. Child2 In part-time school, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 17 Number of PSUs = 17 Population size = 63.4040825 Subpop. no. obs = 17 Subpop. size = 63.4040825 Design df = 14 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 53 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 39 [JewEd] K5 Part -Time Child 2 percentage obs No 18 Yes 82 Total 100 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedk5dyc2: 1. Child2 In day camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of PSUs = 17 1 16 17 Number of obs = 17 Population size = 63.4040825 Subpop. no. obs = 17 Subpop. size = 63.4040825 Design df = 14 [JewEd] K5 Day Camp Child 2 percentage obs No 100 17 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedk5ovc2: 1. Child2 In overnight camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of PSUs = 17 Number of obs = 17 Population size = 63.4040825 Subpop. no. obs = 17 Subpop. size = 63.4040825 Design df = 14 [JewEd] K5 Ovn Camp Child 2 percentage obs No 75 14 Yes 25 3 Total 100 17 Key: percentage cell percentage obs = number of observations jed68pt2: 1. Child2 In part-time school, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of PSUs = 14 Number of obs = 14 Population size = 90.5309982 Subpop. no. obs = 14 Subpop. size = 90.5309982 Design df = 11 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 54 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 40 [JewEd] 68 Part -Time Child 2 percentage obs No 63 6 Yes 37 8 Total 100 14 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jed68dyc2: 1. Child2 In day camp, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 14 Number of PSUs = 14 Population size = 90.5309982 Subpop. no. obs = 14 Subpop. size = 90.5309982 Design df = 11 [JewEd] 68 Day Camp Child 2 percentage obs No 84 12 Yes 16 2 Total 100 14 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jed68ovc2: 1. Child2 In overnight camp, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 14 Number of PSUs = 14 Population size = 90.5309982 Subpop. no. obs = 14 Subpop. size = 90.5309982 Design df = 11 [JewEd] 68 Ovn Camp Child 2 percentage obs No 73 11 Yes 27 3 Total 100 14 Key: percentage cell percentage obs = number of observations jed68msp2: 1. Child2 In MSP, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 14 Number of PSUs = 14 Population size = 90.5309982 Subpop. no. obs = 14 Subpop. size = 90.5309982 Design df = 11 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 55 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 41 [JewEd] 68 MSP Child 2 percentage obs No 66 10 Yes 34 4 Total 100 14 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jed912pt2: 1. Child2 In part-time school, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 12 Number of PSUs = 12 Population size = 59.4516327 Subpop. no. obs = 12 Subpop. size = 59.4516327 Design df = 8 [JewEd] 912 Part -Time Child 2 percentage obs No 75 5 Yes 25 7 Total 100 12 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jed912dyc2: 1. Child2 In day camp, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 12 Number of PSUs = 12 Population size = 59.4516327 Subpop. no. obs = 12 Subpop. size = 59.4516327 Design df = 8 [JewEd] 912 Day Camp Child 2 percentage obs No 94 10 Yes 6 2 Total 100 12 Key: percentage cell percentage obs = number of observations jed912ovc2: 1. Child2 In overnight camp, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 12 Number of PSUs = 12 Population size = 59.4516327 Subpop. no. obs = 12 Subpop. size = 59.4516327 Design df = 8 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 56 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 42 [JewEd] 912 Ovn Camp Child 2 percentage obs No 86 Yes 14 Total 100 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jed912bbyo2: 1. Child2 In BBYO, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of PSUs = 12 8 4 12 Number of obs = 12 Population size = 59.4516327 Subpop. no. obs = 12 Subpop. size = 59.4516327 Design df = 8 [JewEd] 912 BBYO Child 2 percentage obs No 89 8 Yes 11 4 Total 100 12 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedisr2: 1. Child2 Done Israel trip, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs - 10 Number of PSUs = 10 Population size = 39.1201746 Subpop. no. obs = 10 Subpop. size = 39.1201746 Design df = 6 [JewEd] Isr Trip Child 2 percentage obs No 100 10 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 66 . 67 foreach x of varlist hhchrelrsd2_oth hhchrelrsd2_joth { 2. note 1 'x' 3. count if 'x'!=" & hhjewish==1 4. ] hhchrelrsd2_oth: 1. Child2 Is this child being raised... 1 hhchrelrsd2_joth: 1. Child2 Is this child being raised... 3 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 57 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 43 68 . 69 ********* 70 *Child 3 71 ********* 72 73 foreach x of varlist hhchage_3 hhchgrd3 hhchgender3 hhchrlt3 hhchbarbat3 jedjpk3 jedpk3 jedk5pt3 jedk5d > sp3 jed912pt3 jed912dyc3 jed912ovc3 jed912bbyo3 jedisr3 { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab 'x', per format (a20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. } hhchage_3: 1. Child3 What is {his/her/their} age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs - 18 Number of PSUs = 18 Population size - 86.3532488 Subpop. no. obs = 18 Subpop. size = 86.3532488 Design df = 15 RECODE of hhchage3 (Child age 3) percentage obs 0-5 11 2 7-12 58 12 13-17 31 4 Total 100 18 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhchgrd3: 1. Child3 What grade was {he/she/this child} in during the 2016-17 school year? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 18 Number of PSUs = 18 Population size = 86.3532488 Subpop. no. obs = 18 Subpop. size = 86.3532488 Design df = 15 Child grade 3 percentage obs Not yet in kindergarten 8 1 K-5 61 13 6-8 7 1 9-12 23 3 Total 100 18 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhchgender3: 1. Child3 Is this child... (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 17 Number of PSUs = 17 Population size = 74.7350447 Subpop. no. obs = 17 Subpop. size = 74.7350447 Design df = 14 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 58 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 44 Child gender 3 percentage obs Male 93 14 Female 7 3 Total 100 17 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhchrlt3: 1. Child3 What is your relationship to fhim/her/this child}? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 17 Number of PSUs = 17 Population size = 74.7350447 Subpop. no. obs = 17 Subpop. size = 74.7350447 Design df = 14 Child relationship 3 percentage obs Your child 100 17 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hhchbarbat3: 1. Child3 Did this child have a Bar or Bat Mitzvah? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size = 20.2916172 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 20.2916172 Design df = 1 Child bar/bat mitzvah 3 percentage obs No 57 1 Yes 43 2 Total 100 3 Key: percentage cell percentage obs = number of observations jedjpk3: 1. Child3 In Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 6.81860685 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 6.81860685 Design df = 0 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 59 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 45 [JewEd] J Pre-K Child 3 percentage obs Yes 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedpk3: 1. Child3 In non-Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 6.81860685 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 6.81860685 Design df = 0 [JewEd] NJ Pre-K Child 3 percentage obs No 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedk5pt3: 1. Child3 In part-time school, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of PSUs = 13 Number of obs = 13 Population size = 52.9297895 Subpop. no. obs = 13 Subpop. size = 52.9297895 Design df = 11 [JewEd] K5 Part -Time Child 3 percentage obs No 55 6 Yes 45 7 Total 100 13 Key: percentage cell percentage obs = number of observations jedk5dyc3: 1. Child3 In day camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of PSUs = 13 Number of obs = 13 Population size = 52.9297895 Subpop. no. obs = 13 Subpop. size = 52.9297895 Design df = 11 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 60 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 46 [JewEd] K5 Day Camp Child 3 percentage obs No 67 Yes 33 Total 100 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedk5ovc3: 1. Child3 In overnight camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of PSUs = 13 10 3 13 Number of obs = 13 Population size = 52.9297895 Subpop. no. obs = 13 Subpop. size = 52.9297895 Design df = 11 [JewEd] K5 Ovn Camp Child 3 percentage obs No 74 12 Yes 26 1 Total 100 13 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jed68pt3: 1. Child3 In part-time school, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size = 6.31323528 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 6.31323528 Design df = 0 [JewEd] 68 Part -Time Child 3 percentage obs Yes 100 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jed68dyc3: 1. Child3 In day camp, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 6.31323528 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 6.31323528 Design df = 0 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 61 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 47 [JewEd] 68 Day Camp Child 3 percentage obs No 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jed68ovc3: 1. Child3 In overnight camp, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 6.31323528 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 6.31323528 Design df = 0 [JewEd] 68 Ovn Camp Child 3 percentage obs No 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jed68msp3: 1. Child3 In MSP, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 6.31323528 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 6.31323528 Design df = 0 [JewEd] 68 MSP Child 3 percentage obs No 100 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jed912pt3: 1. Child3 In part-time school, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of PSUs = 3 Number of obs = 3 Population size = 20.2916172 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 20.2916172 Design df = 1 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 62 Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 48 [JewEd] 912 Part -Time Child 3 percentage obs No 84 Yes 16 Total 100 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jed912dyc3: 1. Child3 In day camp, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of PSUs = 3 2 1 3 Number of obs = 3 Population size = 20.2916172 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 20.2916172 Design df = 1 [JewEd] 912 Day Camp Child 3 percentage obs No 100 3 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jed912ovc3: 1. Child3 In overnight camp, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of PSUs = 3 Number of obs = 3 Population size = 20.2916172 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 20.2916172 Design df = 1 [JewEd] 912 Ovn Camp Child 3 percentage obs No 84 2 Yes 16 1 Total 100 3 Key: percentage cell percentage obs = number of observations jed912bbyo3: 1. Child3 In BBYO, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of PSUs = 3 Number of obs = 3 Population size = 20.2916172 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 20.2916172 Design df = 1 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 63 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 49 [JewEd] 912 BBYO Child 3 percentage obs No 84 2 Yes 16 1 Total 100 3 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedisr3: 1. Child3 Done Israel trip, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of PSUs = 3 Number of obs = 3 Population size = 20.2916172 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 20.2916172 Design df = 1 [JewEd] Isr Trip Child 3 percentage obs No 100 3 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 74 . 75 . foreach x of varlist hhchrelrsd3_joth { 2. note 1 'x' 3. count if 'x'!=" & hhjewish==1 4. ] hhchrelrsd3_joth: 1. Child3 Is this child being raised... 1 76 . 77 ********* 78 *Child 4 79 ********* 80 81 foreach x of varlist hhchage_4 hhchgrd4 hhchgender4 hhchrlt4 jedjpk4 jedpk4 jedk5pt4 jedk5dyc4 jedk5ovc 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. ] hhchage_4: 1. Child4 What is {his/her/their) age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size = 8.18232822 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 8.18232822 Design df = 2 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 64 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 50 RECODE of hhchage4 (Child age 4) percentage obs 0-5 33 1 7-12 67 2 Total 100 3 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhchgrd4: 1. Child4 What grade was {he/she/this child) in during the 2016-17 school year? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 4 Number of PSUs = 4 Population size = 21.8195419 Subpop. no. obs = 4 Subpop. size = 21.8195419 Design df = 3 Child grade 4 percentage obs Not yet in kindergarten 63 1 K-5 38 3 Total 100 4 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhchgender4: 1. Child4 Is this child... (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 4 Number of PSUs = 4 Population size = 21.8195419 Subpop. no. obs = 4 Subpop. size = 21.8195419 Design df = 3 Child gender 4 percentage obs Male 13 1 Female 88 3 Total 100 4 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hhchrlt4: 1. Child4 What is your relationship to {him/her/this child)? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 4 Number of PSUs = 4 Population size = 21.8195419 Subpop. no. obs = 4 Subpop. size = 21.8195419 Design df = 3 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 65 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 51 Child relationship 4 percentage obs Your child 100 4 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedjpk4: 1. Child4 In Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 13.6372137 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 13.6372137 Design df = 0 [JewEd] J Pre-K Child 4 percentage obs Yes 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedpk4: 1. Child4 In non-Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 13.6372137 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 13.6372137 Design df = 0 [JewEd] NJ Pre-K Child 4 percentage obs No 100 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedk5pt4: 1. Child4 In part-time school, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 3 Number of obs = 3 Population size = 8.18232822 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 8.18232822 Design df = 2 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 66 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 52 [JewEd] K5 Part -Time Child 4 percentage obs No 33 Yes 67 Total 100 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedk5dyc4: 1. Child4 In day camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 3 1 2 3 Number of obs = 3 Population size = 8.18232822 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 8.18232822 Design df = 2 [JewEd] K5 Day Camp Child 4 percentage obs No 100 3 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jedk5ovc4: 1. Child4 In overnight camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 3 Number of obs = 3 Population size = 8.18232822 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 8.18232822 Design df = 2 [JewEd] K5 Ovn Camp Child 4 percentage obs No 100 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 82 83 3 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 67 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 53 84 . ********* 85 *Location/Residence 86 ********* 87 88 foreach x of varlist locown locsechome locsecwhere locsecprim locyears_dec locyearsseason_dec locsecpl 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(respjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. ) locown: 1. Thinking about your residence in Greater Naples, do you... (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 875 Number of PSUs = 875 Population size = 5,244.26 Subpop. no. obs = 873 Subpop. size = 5,236.0777 Design df = 866 Own or rent percentage obs Rent 6 71 Own 94 802 Total 100 873 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations locsechome: 1. Aside from where you live in Greater Naples, do you have another residence? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 873 Number of PSUs = 873 Population size = 5,241.5807 Subpop. no. obs = 871 Subpop. size = 5,233.3984 Design df = 864 Own second home percentage obs No 57 476 Yes 43 395 Total 100 871 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations locsecwhere: 1. Where is that other residence? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 396 Number of PSUs = 396 Population size = 2,272.8204 Subpop. no. obs = 394 Subpop. size = 2,264.638 Design df = 387 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 68 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 54 Where second home percentage obs Florida 12 22 Other Southern United States 4 21 Northeastern United States 48 183 Midwestern United States 28 139 Western United States 2 9 Rest of world 6 20 Total 100 394 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations locsecprim: 1. Would you consider your Greater Naples address your primary residence? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 392 Number of PSUs = 392 Population size = 2,264.4585 Subpop. no. obs = 390 Subpop. size = 2,256.2761 Design df = 383 Local home primary percentage obs No 31 141 Yes 69 249 Total 100 390 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations locyears_dec: 1. How long have you lived in the Greater Naples area? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 725 Number of PSUs = 725 Population size = 4,513.6289 Subpop. no. obs = 723 Subpop. size = 4,505.4466 Design df = 716 RECODE of locyears (Years in Naples) percentage obs -1 0 1 0-9 yrs 33 246 10-19 yrs 46 302 20-29 yrs 14 128 30-39 yrs 5 34 40-49 yrs 1 8 50-59 yrs 0 1 208 0 1 2009 0 1 2011 0 1 Total 100 723 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 69 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 55 locyearsseason_dec: 1. How long have you owned/rented a home in Greater Naples? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 7 Number of obs = 143 Number of PSUs = 143 Population size = 717.538882 Subpop. no. obs = 141 Subpop. size = 709.356554 Design df = 136 RECODE of locyearsseason (Years in Naples: Seasonal) percentage obs 0-9 yrs 46 62 10-19 yrs 32 58 20-29 yrs 21 16 30-39 yrs 1 4 40-49 yrs 0 1 Total 100 141 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations locsecplans: 1. Do you anticipate changing the length of time you spend each year in the Greater Naples area? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 389 Number of PSUs = 389 Population size = 2,210.4214 Subpop. no. obs = 387 Subpop. size = 2,202.2391 Design df = 380 Plans for future: Seasonal percentage obs No 64 268 Yes, increasing 34 109 Yes, decreasing 2 10 Total 100 387 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations locplot: 1. Do you have a personal or family burial plot in the Greater Naples area? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 881 Number of PSUs = 881 Population size = 5,250.1056 Subpop. no. obs = 879 Subpop. size = 5,241.9232 Design df = 872 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 70 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 56 Burial Plot percentage obs No, I do not have one 59 455 No, I have one elsewhere 35 349 Yes 5 71 I don t know 1 4 Total 100 879 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 89 . 90 . note 1 locsecwhen locsecwhen: 1. What part of the year do you spend in the Greater Naples area? 91 . count if locsecwhen!=" & hhjewish==1 386 92 93 . 94 ********* 95 *Holocaust Survivor 96 ********* 97 foreach x of varlist holsurvhh holsurvresp holsurvadct holchildhh holchildresp holchildadct holchildchc 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. } holsurvhh: 1. Does anyone in your household consider themselves to be a Holocaust Survivor or refugee from Nazism (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 420 Number of PSUs = 420 Population size = 2,545.8384 Subpop. no. obs = 420 Subpop. size = 2,545.8384 Design df = 412 Holocuast survivor in HH percentage obs No 98 410 Yes, me 1 6 Yes, someone else 0 4 Total 100 420 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations holsurvresp: 1. Do you consider yourself to be a Holocaust Survivor or refugee from Nazism? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 109 Number of PSUs = 109 Population size = 846.184098 Subpop. no. obs = 109 Subpop. size = 846.184098 Design df = 103 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 71 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 57 Holocuast survivor is R percentage obs No 94 104 Yes 6 5 Total 100 109 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations holsurvadct: 1. How many people are Holocaust Survivors or refugees from Nazism? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 4 Number of PSUs = 4 Population size = 8.06391138 Subpop. no. obs = 4 Subpop. size = 8.06391138 Design df = 3 Holocuast survivor adult ct percentage obs 1 58 3 9 42 1 Total 100 4 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations holchildhh: 1. Does anyone in your household consider themselves to be a descendant of a Holocaust Survivor or ref (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 706 Number of PSUs = 706 Population size = 4,044.8035 Subpop. no. obs = 706 Subpop. size = 4,044.8035 Design df = 697 Child of HS in HH percentage obs No 85 583 Yes, me 9 66 Yes, someone else 4 38 Yes, both me and someone else 2 19 Total 100 706 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations holchildresp: 1. Do you consider yourself to be a descendant of a Holocaust Survivor or refugee from Nazism? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 65 Number of PSUs = 65 Population size = 420.812522 Subpop. no. obs = 65 Subpop. size = 420.812522 Design df = 59 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 72 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 58 Child of HS is R percentage obs No 77 51 Yes 23 14 Total 100 65 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations holchildadct: 1. How many (other} adults? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 54 Number of PSUs = 54 Population size = 221.646058 Subpop. no. obs = 54 Subpop. size = 221.646058 Design df = 48 Child of HS adult ct percentage obs 1 77 43 2 23 10 4 1 1 Total 100 54 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations holchildchct: 1. How many children? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size = 22.8969345 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 22.8969345 Design df = 1 Child of HS child ct percentage obs 1 40 2 4 60 1 Total 100 3 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 98 . 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 73 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 59 99 . ********* 100 *J Education 101 ********* 102 foreach x of varlist pkno_cost pkno_oth pknoimp_cost pknoimp_oth pjlib jedpkpast jednosch_cost jednosc > himp_unwelcome jednoschimp_oth jedtut { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. ) pkno_cost: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your children are not currently enrolled in a Jewish presc (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 916 Number of PSUs = 916 Population size = 5,620.5687 Subpop. no. obs = 916 Subpop. size = 5,620.5687 Design df = 907 No pre-k: Cost percentage obs Not selected 100 915 Yes 0 1 Total 100 916 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations pkno_oth: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your children are not currently enrolled in a Jewish presc (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 916 Number of PSUs = 916 Population size = 5,620.5687 Subpop. no. obs = 916 Subpop. size = 5,620.5687 Design df = 907 No pre-k: Other percentage obs Not selected 100 915 Yes 0 1 Total 100 916 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations pknoimp_cost: 1. [Which is the most important?] Cost (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size = 2.72744274 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 2.72744274 Design df = 0 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 74 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 60 No pre-k: Cost Important percentage obs Very important 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. pknoimp_oth: 1. [Which is the most important?] Other (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 13.2733278 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 13.2733278 Design df = 0 No pre-k: Other Important percentage obs Very important 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. pjlib: 1. Does any child in your household receive books from PJ (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 27 Number of PSUs = 27 Population size = 155.741889 Subpop. no. obs = 27 Subpop. size = 155.741889 Design df = 23 Participates in PJ Library percentage obs No 13 4 Yes 87 23 Total 100 27 Key: percentage cell percentage obs = number of observations jedpkpast: 1. {Did the child / Did any of the children) in grades K-12 attend a Jewish preschool or daycare progr (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 50 Number of PSUs = 50 Population size = 185.294502 Subpop. no. obs = 50 Subpop. size = 185.294502 Design df = 44 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 75 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 61 Former Jewish pre-k percentage obs No 28 14 Yes 72 36 Total 100 50 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jednosch_cost: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that the children in your household are not currently enrolled (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 916 Number of PSUs = 916 Population size = 5,620.5687 Subpop. no. obs = 916 Subpop. size = 5,620.5687 Design df = 907 No JewEd: Cost percentage obs Not selected 100 914 Yes 0 2 Total 100 916 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jednosch_unwelcome: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that the children in your household are not currently enrolled inclusive to my family (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 916 Number of PSUs = 916 Population size = 5,620.5687 Subpop. no. obs = 916 Subpop. size = 5,620.5687 Design df = 907 No JewEd: Not welcoming to family percentage obs Not selected 100 915 Yes 0 1 Total 100 916 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jednosch_oth: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that the children in your household are not currently enrolled (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 916 Number of PSUs = 916 Population size = 5,620.5687 Subpop. no. obs = 916 Subpop. size = 5,620.5687 Design df = 907 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 76 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 62 No JewEd: Other percentage obs Not selected 100 Yes 0 Total 100 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jednoschimp_cost: 1. [Which is the most important?] Cost (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 913 3 916 Number of obs = 1 Population size = 26.8927574 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 26.8927574 Design df = 0 No JewEd: Cost Important percentage obs Very important 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jednoschimp_unwelcome: 1. [Which is the most important?] Not welcoming or inclusive to my family (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size = 1.14382219 Subpop. no. obs = 1 Subpop. size = 1.14382219 Design df = 0 No JewEd: Not welcoming to family Important percentage obs Very important 100 1 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. jednoschimp_oth: 1. [Which is the most important?] Other (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of PSUs = 2 Number of obs = 2 Population size = 7.7709161 Subpop. no. obs = 2 Subpop. size = 7.7709161 Design df = 1 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 77 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 63 No JewEd: Other Important percentage obs A little important 87 1 Very important 13 1 Total 100 2 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jedtut: 1. Does [the/any] child participate in any Jewish education conducted remotely (e.g., online with a to (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 56 Number of PSUs = 56 Population size = 243.467351 Subpop. no. obs = 56 Subpop. size = 243.467351 Design df = 50 Child in Jewish tutoring / other percentage obs No 97 53 Yes 3 3 Total 100 56 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 103 . note 1 pkno othtxt pkno_othtxt: 1. What is the other reason? 104 . count if pkno_othtxt!=" & hhjewish==1 1 105 . 106 107 ********* 108 *Young Adults 109 ********* 110 foreach x of varlist yastud yadeg yasigoth yarelrelig yamarj yakidsj { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(respjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. 1 yastud: 1. Are you currently a student in a degree -granting program in a college or university? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 45 Number of PSUs = 45 Population size = 217.14938 Subpop. no. obs = 43 Subpop. size = 208.967051 Design df = 41 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 78 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 64 YA student percentage obs No 97 41 Yes, full-time 3 2 Total 100 43 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations yadeg: 1. What level of schooling are you currently enrolled in? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 4 Number of PSUs = 4 Population size = 14.2769842 Subpop. no. obs = 2 Subpop. size = 6.09465599 Design df = 3 YA degree program percentage obs Master 45 1 Professional/PhD 55 1 Total 100 2 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations yasigoth: 1. Do you currently have a fiance/e, partner or significant other who you do not live with? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 14 Number of PSUs = 14 Population size = 47.6118681 Subpop. no. obs = 12 Subpop. size = 39.4295399 Design df = 11 YA has significant other percentage obs No 82 9 Yes 18 3 Total 100 12 Key: percentage cell percentage obs = number of observations yarelrelig: 1. What is the religion of your significant other? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 5 Number of PSUs = 5 Population size = 15.3669123 Subpop. no. obs = 3 Subpop. size = 7.18458411 Design df = 2 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 79 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 65 Significant other's religion percentage obs Jewish 62 2 Another religion 38 1 Total 100 3 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations yamarj: 1. How important is to you to marry someone Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 15 Number of PSUs = 15 Population size = 49.899962 Subpop. no. obs = 13 Subpop. size = 41.7176338 Design df = 12 Importance of marrying Jews percentage obs Not important 5 1 A little important 15 2 Somewhat important 8 1 Very important 24 5 I don't plan on getting marrie 48 4 Total 100 13 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations yakidsj: 1. How important is it to you to raise Jewish children? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 29 Number of PSUs = 29 Population size = 92.0774175 Subpop. no. obs = 27 Subpop. size = 83.8950893 Design df = 26 Importance of Jewish kids percentage obs Somewhat important 18 4 Very important 51 16 I don t plan on having kids 31 7 Total 100 27 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 80 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 66 111 . 112 . foreach x of varlist yainttxt yarelrelig oth 2. note 1 'x' 3. count if hhjewish==1 & 'x'!=" " 4. } yainttxt: 1. In what ways, if any, would you like to become more involved with the Greater Naples Jewish communi 15 yarelrelig_oth: 1. What is the religion of your significant other? 1 113 . 114 ********* 115 *Subpopulations 116 ********* 117 foreach x of varlist interhh glbhh glbresp glbct polvote { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. } interhh: 1. Are you or anyone in your household currently in an interfaith relationship? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 67 Number of PSUs = 67 Population size = 367.100008 Subpop. no. obs = 67 Subpop. size = 367.100008 Design df = 59 HH has interfaith couple percentage obs No 77 43 Yes 23 24 Total 100 67 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations glbhh: 1. Do you or anyone in your household consider themselves to be gay, lesbian, or bisexual? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 700 Number of PSUs = 700 Population size = 4,010.0689 Subpop. no. obs = 700 Subpop. size = 4,010.0689 Design df = 691 HH has GLB individual percentage obs No 100 692 Yes, me 0 3 Yes, someone else 0 3 Yes, both me and someone else 0 2 Total 100 700 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 81 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 67 glbresp: 1. Is that you or someone else? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 7 Number of obs = 167 Number of PSUs = 167 Population size = 1,209.653 Subpop. no. obs = 167 Subpop. size = 1,209.653 Design df = 160 Respondent is GLB percentage obs No 98 163 Yes 2 4 Total 100 167 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations glbct: 1. How many adults? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 5 Number of PSUs = 5 Population size = 13.9729047 Subpop. no. obs = 5 Subpop. size = 13.9729047 Design df = 3 GLB adults percentage obs 0 20 1 1 56 3 2 24 1 Total 100 5 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations polvote: 1. Are you registered to vote in the Greater Naples area? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 871 Number of PSUs = 871 Population size = 5,250.4409 Subpop. no. obs = 871 Subpop. size = 5,250.4409 Design df = 862 Vote in Naples percentage obs No 15 152 Yes 85 719 Total 100 871 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 82 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 68 118 119 ********* 120 *Synagogues 121 ********* 122 foreach x of varlist rlsynany rlsynformer rlsyn_shalomorig rlsyn tikvaorig rlsyn_chabadorig rlsyn_marco > orig rlsynseasonalorig rlsynno_norelig rlsynno_nokids rlsynno_cost rlsynno_social rlsynno_fit rlsynno_w 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab 'x', per format (o20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. ] rlsynany: 1. Do you or anyone in your household currently belong to any Jewish congregation, such as a synagogue congregation? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 864 Number of PSUs = 864 Population size = 5,221.7488 Subpop. no. obs = 864 Subpop. size = 5,221.7488 Design df = 855 Belong to a synagogue percentage obs No 58 278 Yes 42 586 Total 100 864 Key: percentage = cell percentage ohs = number of observations rlsynformer: 1. Did you formerly belong to a Jewish congregation during your adult life? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 276 Number of PSUs = 276 Population size = 3,017.3342 Subpop. no. obs = 276 Subpop. size = 3,017.3342 Design df = 267 Former synagogue member percentage obs No 32 61 Yes 68 215 Total 100 276 Key: percentage cell percentage obs = number of observations rlsyn_shalomorig: 1. [Do you or anyone in your household belong to...] Temple Shalom (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 399 Number of PSUs = 399 Population size 1,598.012 Subpop. no. obs = 399 Subpop. size = 1,598.012 Design df = 390 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 83 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 69 Temple Shalom percentage obs No 58 185 Yes, and I pay dues 38 200 Yes, and I do not pay dues 3 14 Total 100 399 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations rlsyn_tikvaorig: 1. [Do you or anyone in your household belong to...] Beth Tikva (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 298 Number of PSUs = 298 Population size = 1,206.6756 Subpop. no. obs = 298 Subpop. size = 1,206.6756 Design df = 289 Beth Tikva percentage obs No 83 213 Yes, and I pay dues 15 74 Yes, and I do not pay dues 2 11 Total 100 298 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations rlsyn_chabadorig: 1. [Do you or anyone in your household belong to...] Chabad Jewish Center of Naples (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 283 Number of PSUs = 283 Population size = 1,223.6428 Subpop. no. obs = 283 Subpop. size = 1,223.6428 Design df = 275 Chabad percentage obs No 81 213 Yes, and I pay dues 11 47 Yes, and I do not pay dues 8 23 Total 100 283 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs number of observations rlsyn_marcoorig: 1. [Do you or anyone in your household belong to...] Jewish Congregation of Marco Island (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 261 Number of PSUs = 261 Population size = 1,142.178 Subpop. no. obs = 261 Subpop. size = 1,142.178 Design df = 253 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 84 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 70 Jewish Congregation Marco Island percentage obs No 85 214 Yes, and I pay dues 14 41 Yes, and I do not pay dues 1 6 Total 100 261 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations rlsyn_naplesorig: 1. [Do you or anyone in your household belong to...] Naples Jewish Congregation (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 257 Number of PSUs = 257 Population size = 1,136.7068 Subpop. no. obs = 257 Subpop. size = 1,136.7068 Design df = 249 Naples Jewish Congregation percentage obs No 92 222 Yes, and I pay dues 8 32 Yes, and I do not pay dues 1 3 Total 100 257 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations rlsyn_humanistorig: 1. [Do you or anyone in your household belong to...] Humanistic Jewish Chavurah (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 231 Number of PSUs = 231 Population size = 1,065.13 Subpop. no. obs = 231 Subpop. size = 1,065.13 Design df = 223 Humanistic Jewish Chavurah percentage obs No 98 227 Yes, and I pay dues 2 3 Yes, and I do not pay dues 0 1 Total 100 231 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs 574 Number of PSUs = 574 Population size = 2,125.4889 Subpop. no. obs = 574 Subpop. size = 2,125.4889 Design df = 565 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 85 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 71 Other congregation percentage obs No 92 531 Yes, and I pay dues 7 37 Yes, and I do not pay dues 1 6 Total 100 574 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations rlsynseasonalorig: 1. Do you or anyone in your household belong to any Jewish congregation outside of the Greater Naples (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 577 Number of PSUs = 577 Population size = 2,148.1443 Subpop. no. obs = 577 Subpop. size = 2,148.1443 Design df = 568 Other congregation: Seasonal percentage obs No 44 295 Yes 56 282 Total 100 577 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations rlsynno_norelig: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your household {does not belong / no longer belongs} to a (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 171 Number of PSUs = 171 Population size = 2,124.0934 Subpop. no. obs = 171 Subpop. size = 2,124.0934 Design df = 163 No synag: Not religious percentage obs No 27 44 Yes 73 127 Total 100 171 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations rlsynno_nokids: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your household (does not belong / no longer belongs} to a (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 118 Number of PSUs = 118 Population size = 1,376.9588 Subpop. no. obs = 118 Subpop. size = 1,376.9588 Design df = 110 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 86 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 72 No synag: No kids percentage obs No 53 45 Yes 47 73 Total 100 118 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations rlsynno_cost: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your household {does not belong / no longer belongs} to a (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 152 Number of PSUs = 152 Population size = 1,522.5673 Subpop. no. obs = 152 Subpop. size = 1,522.5673 Design df = 144 No synag: Cost percentage obs No 55 56 Yes 45 96 Total 100 152 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations rlsynno_social: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your household {does not belong / no longer belongs} to a (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 7 Number of obs = 83 Number of PSUs = 83 Population size = 1,082.9069 Subpop. no. obs = 83 Subpop. size = 1,082.9069 Design df = 76 No synag: Social reason percentage obs No 84 62 Yes 16 21 Total 100 83 Key: percentage cell percentage obs = number of observations rlsynno_fit: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your household {does not belong / no longer belongs} (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 7 Number of obs = 124 Number of PSUs = 124 Population size 1,386.9805 Subpop. no. obs = 124 Subpop. size = 1,386.9805 Design df = 117 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 87 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 73 No synag: No fit percentage obs No 60 55 Yes 40 69 Total 100 124 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations rlsynno_welc: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your household (does not belong / no longer belongs} to a (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 7 Number of obs = 88 Number of PSUs = 88 Population size = 1,121.8713 Subpop. no. obs = 88 Subpop. size = 1,121.8713 Design df = 81 No synag: Not welcoming to family percentage obs No 90 70 Yes 10 18 Total 100 88 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations rlsynno_oth: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your household {does not belong / no longer belongs} to a (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 7 Number of obs = 112 Number of PSUs = 112 Population size = 1,465.7891 Subpop. no. obs = 112 Subpop. size = 1,465.7891 Design df = 105 No synag: Other percentage obs No 38 47 Yes 62 65 Total 100 112 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 123 note 1 rlsynno othtxt rlsynno_othtxt: 1. What is that other reason? 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 88 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 74 124 . count if rlsynno_othtxt!=" & hhjewish==1 51 125 126 ********* 127 *Ritual 128 ********* 129 foreach x of varlist rlsynsvc rlholhigh rlykfast rlshabcand rlseder rlhcndl rlkosh { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(respjewish): tab 'x', per format (o20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. } rlsynsvc: 1. Aside from special occasions like weddings and funerals, how often do you attend any type of organi (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 860 Number of PSUs = 860 Population size = 5,159.0374 Subpop. no. obs = 858 Subpop. size = 5,150.8551 Design df = 851 Frequency attend services percentage obs Never 29 84 Once or twice a year 32 245 Every few months 21 229 Once a month 6 97 Two or three times a month 5 105 Weekly or more 7 98 Total 100 858 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations rlholhigh: 1. Did you attend any High Holiday services this past fall? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 775 Number of PSUs = 775 Population size 3,734.8246 Subpop. no. obs = 773 Subpop. size = 3,726.6423 Design df = 766 Attend High Holiday services in past year percentage obs No 29 138 Yes 71 635 Total 100 773 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 860 Number of PSUs = 860 Population size = 5,158.7191 Subpop. no. obs = 858 Subpop. size = 5,150.5368 Design df = 851 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 89 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 75 Fasted Yom Kippur percentage obs Whole day 29 359 Part of day 15 128 Medical Reason 11 143 No 46 228 Total 100 858 Key: percentage cell percentage obs = number of observations rlshabcand: 1. How often do you or someone in your household light Shabbat candles on a Friday night? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 859 Number of PSUs = 859 Population size = 5,131.4452 Subpop. no. obs = 857 Subpop. size = 5,123.2629 Design df = 850 Light Shabbat candles percentage obs Never 59 401 Sometimes 29 302 Usually 4 65 Always 8 89 Total 100 857 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations rlseder: 1. [In a typical year, do you or anyone in your household...] Attend or hold a Passover seder (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 858 Number of PSUs = 858 Population size = 5,101.7038 Subpop. no. obs = 856 Subpop. size = 5,093.5215 Design df = 849 Attend seder in past year percentage obs No 19 69 Yes 81 787 Total 100 856 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations rlhcndl: 1. [In a typical year, do you or anyone in your household...] Light Hanukkah candles (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 850 Number of PSUs = 850 Population size 4,908.7805 Subpop. no. obs = 848 Subpop. size = 4,900.5982 Design df = 841 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 90 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 76 Light Chanukah candles in past year percentage obs No 23 75 Yes 77 773 Total 100 848 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations rlkosh: 1. Which of the following best describes your current practices regarding keeping kosher? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 864 Number of PSUs = 864 Population size = 5,174.6564 Subpop. no. obs = 862 Subpop. size = 5,166.474 Design df = 855 Kosher practices percentage obs Don t follow kosher rules at a 79 585 Follow some kosher rules, like 16 201 Keep kosher only at home 3 43 Keep kosher all the time 2 33 Total 100 862 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 130 131 ********* 132 *Jewish Life 133 ********* 134 foreach x of varlist jlfriend jlculture jlethnic jlrelig jlcomm jlantiworld jlanticollege jlantius jlan > ily jlconnseasonal { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(respjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. ) jlfriend: 1. How many of the people you consider to be your closest friends are Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 846 Number of PSUs = 846 Population size 5,057.3388 Subpop. no. obs = 844 Subpop. size = 5,049.1564 Design df = 837 Number of Jewish friends percentage obs None 12 30 Some 27 194 About half 18 170 Most 39 408 All 3 42 Total 100 844 Key: percentage = cell percentage 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 91 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 77 obs = number of observations jlculture: 1. [To you personally, to what extent is being Jewish a matter of...] Culture (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 839 Number of PSUs = 839 Population size = 4,937.3723 Subpop. no. obs = 837 Subpop. size = 4,929.1899 Design df = 830 Being Jewish is culture percentage obs Not at all 0 3 A little 6 27 Somewhat 20 161 Very much 73 646 Total 100 837 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jlethnic: 1. [To you personally, to what extent is being Jewish a matter of...] Ethnicity (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 819 Number of PSUs = 819 Population size = 4,820.6041 Subpop. no. obs = 817 Subpop. size = 4,812.4217 Design df = 810 Being Jewish is ethnicity percentage obs Not at all 5 40 A little 11 59 Somewhat 26 193 Very much 57 525 Total 100 817 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jlrelig: 1. [To you personally, to what extent is being Jewish a matter of...] Religion (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 825 Number of PSUs = 825 Population size = 4,870.7938 Subpop. no. obs = 823 Subpop. size = 4,862.6115 Design df = 816 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 92 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 78 Being Jewish is religion percentage obs Not at all 15 35 A little 15 104 Somewhat 24 207 Very much 46 477 Total 100 823 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jlcomm: 1. [To you personally, to what extent is being Jewish a matter of...] Community (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 815 Number of PSUs = 815 Population size = 4,744.338 Subpop. no. obs = 813 Subpop. size = 4,736.1557 Design df = 806 Being Jewish is community percentage obs Not at all 18 38 A little 14 88 Somewhat 26 245 Very much 42 442 Total 100 813 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jlantiworld: 1. [How concerned are you about antisemitism...] Around the world (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 846 Number of PSUs = 846 Population size = 5,058.4586 Subpop. no. obs = 844 Subpop. size = 5,050.2763 Design df = 837 Concerned about global antisemitism percentage obs Not at all 0 1 A little 2 19 Somewhat 9 116 Very much 89 708 Total 100 844 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jlanticollege: 1. [How concerned are you about antisemitism...] On US college campuses (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 93 Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 79 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 829 Number of PSUs = 829 Population size = 4,937.0108 Subpop. no. obs = 827 Subpop. size = 4,928.8285 Design df = 820 Concerned about college antisemitism percentage obs Not at all 1 10 A little 6 37 Somewhat 16 153 Very much 76 627 Total 100 827 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jlantius: 1. [How concerned are you about antisemitism...] In the United States except college campuses (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 836 Number of PSUs = 836 Population size = 5,035.0692 Subpop. no. obs = 834 Subpop. size = 5,026.8869 Design df = 827 Concerned about US antisemitism percentage obs Not at all 1 3 A little 7 55 Somewhat 17 203 Very much 76 573 Total 100 834 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jlantinaples: 1. [How concerned are you about antisemitism...] In the Greater Naples area (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 835 Number of PSUs = 835 Population size = 4,935.819 Subpop. no. obs = 833 Subpop. size = 4,927.6367 Design df = 826 Concerned about local antisemitism percentage obs Not at all 8 63 A little 22 206 Somewhat 25 268 Very much 45 296 Total 100 833 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 94 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 80 jlconnisr: 1. [To what extent do you...] Feel a connection to Israel (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 849 Number of PSUs = 849 Population size = 5,052.5518 Subpop. no. obs = 847 Subpop. size = 5,044.3695 Design df = 840 Connection to Israel percentage obs Not at all 10 26 A little 11 97 Somewhat 30 247 Very much 49 477 Total 100 847 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jlconnworld: 1. [To what extent do you Feel like part of a worldwide Jewish community (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 837 Number of PSUs = 837 Population size = 4,937.4802 Subpop. no. obs = 835 Subpop. size = 4,929.2978 Design df = 828 Connection to worldwide Jewish community percentage obs Not at all 6 23 A little 14 96 Somewhat 33 251 Very much 47 465 Total 100 835 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jlconnnap: 1. [To what extent do you Feel like part of the Jewish community in the Greater Naples area (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 845 Number of PSUs = 845 Population size = 5,054.1218 Subpop. no. obs = 843 Subpop. size = 5,045.9395 Design df = 836 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 95 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 81 Connection to Naples Jewish community percentage Not at all 17 A little 25 Somewhat 33 Very much 25 Total 100 obs 58 159 283 343 843 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jlconndaily: 1. [To what extent do you Feel that Judaism is part of your daily life (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 841 Number of PSUs = 841 Population size = 4,959.726 Subpop. no. obs = 839 Subpop. size = 4,951.5437 Design df = 832 Feel Judaism is part of daily life percentage obs Not at all 23 79 A little 27 201 Somewhat 24 248 Very much 26 311 Total 100 839 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations jlconnseasonal: 1. [To what extent do you Feel like part of the Jewish community where you have another home (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 381 Number of PSUs = 381 Population size = 2,175.6855 Subpop. no. obs = 379 Subpop. size = 2,167.5032 Design df = 372 Connection to 2nd community home J percentage obs Not at all 22 43 A little 17 64 Somewhat 28 102 Very much 33 170 Total 100 379 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 96 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 82 135 . 136 ********* 137 *Israel 138 ********* 139 foreach x of varlist isrnum isrtypetag isrtag isrtypefed isrfedint isrrelfriend isrnews { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(respjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. ) isrnum: 1. How many times, if any, have you been to Israel? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 845 Number of PSUs = 845 Population size = 5,067.5596 Subpop. no. obs = 843 Subpop. size = 5,059.3772 Design df = 836 Times been to Israel percentage obs Never 38 228 Once 27 249 Twice 13 133 Three times 9 72 Four or more times 9 133 I previously lived in Israel 3 28 Total 100 843 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations isrtypetag: 1. Did you ever participate in a Taglit-Birthright Israel trip? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 43 Number of PSUs = 43 Population size = 201.165006 Subpop. no. obs = 41 Subpop. size = 192.982678 Design df = 39 Been to Israel on Taglit percentage obs No 86 35 Yes 14 6 Total 100 41 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations isrtag: 1. Did you ever apply to go on a Taglit-Birthright Israel trip? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 55 Number of PSUs = 55 Population size = 255.086195 Subpop. no. obs = 53 Subpop. size = 246.903867 Design df = 50 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 97 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 83 Applied to Taglit percentage obs No 97 52 Yes 3 1 Total 100 53 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 612 Number of PSUs = 612 Population size = 3,121.4706 Subpop. no. obs = 610 Subpop. size = 3,113.2882 Design df = 603 Been to Israel on federation trip percentage obs Yes 30 224 No but interested 20 135 No and uninterested 50 251 Total 100 610 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations isrfedint: 1. Would you be interested in participating in a federation, synagogue, or solidarity mission to Israe (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 224 Number of PSUs = 224 Population size = 1,869.3389 Subpop. no. obs = 222 Subpop. size = 1,861.1566 Design df = 215 Interested in federation trip percentage obs No 59 120 Yes 41 102 Total 100 222 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 846 Number of PSUs = 846 Population size = 5,063.7794 Subpop. no. obs = 844 Subpop. size = 5,055.597 Design df = 837 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 98 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 84 Relatives or friends in Israel percentage obs None 61 450 Friend 8 97 Family 23 200 Both 8 97 Total 100 844 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations isrnews: 1. In the past month, how often did you actively seek out news about Israel? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 847 Number of PSUs = 847 Population size = 5,066.1516 Subpop. no. obs = 845 Subpop. size = 5,057.9693 Design df = 838 Seek out news about Israel percentage obs Never 21 105 Once or twice 25 196 Once a week 12 126 Every few days 22 212 Once a day 13 145 Several times a day 7 61 Total 100 845 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 140 141 ********* 142 *Oragnizations 143 ********* 144 foreach x of varlist orgimpisr orgimprcult orgimpsoc orgimpedu { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(respjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. } orgimpisr: 1. [When it comes to the activities and organizations that you are involved with, how important are ea (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 821 Number of PSUs = 821 Population size = 4,535.7502 Subpop. no. obs = 819 Subpop. size = 4,527.5679 Design df = 812 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 99 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 85 Interested in Israel percentage obs Not at all 18 102 A little 23 141 Somewhat 30 282 Very much 29 294 Total 100 819 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations orgimprcult: 1. [When it comes to the activities and organizations that you are involved with, how important are ea Culture (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 811 Number of PSUs = 811 Population size = 4,499.9787 Subpop. no. obs = 809 Subpop. size = 4,491.7963 Design df = 802 Interested in Culture percentage obs Not at all 12 54 A little 17 132 Somewhat 38 330 Very much 34 293 Total 100 809 Key: percentage cell percentage obs = number of observations orgimpsoc: 1. [When it comes to the activities and organizations that you are involved with, how important are ea Activities (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 819 Number of PSUs = 819 Population size = 4,534.6246 Subpop. no. obs = 817 Subpop. size = 4,526.4423 Design df = 810 Interested in Social activities percentage obs Not at all 10 56 A little 16 120 Somewhat 41 381 Very much 33 260 Total 100 817 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations orgimpedu: 1. [When it comes to the activities and organizations that you are involved with, how important are ea (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 100 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 86 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 819 Number of PSUs = 819 Population size = 4,536.9422 Subpop. no. obs = 817 Subpop. size = 4,528.7598 Design df = 810 Interested in Education percentage obs Not at all 10 58 A little 15 127 Somewhat 36 315 Very much 38 317 Total 100 817 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 145 . 146 . foreach x of varlist orgmcawca orgmem orgmemseason orggroups orggroupsseason { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. ) orgmcawca: 1. Do you or anyone in your household belong to the Women's Cultural Alliance or Men's Cultural (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 828 Number of PSUs = 828 Population size = 4,792.6672 Subpop. no. obs = 828 Subpop. size = 4,792.6672 Design df = 819 MCA/WCA Member percentage obs No 62 400 Yes 38 428 Total 100 828 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations orgmem: 1. Aside from congregations and the WCA/MCA, are you or anyone in your household a member of any forma (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 830 Number of PSUs = 830 Population size = 4,799.0353 Subpop. no. obs = 830 Subpop. size = 4,799.0353 Design df = 821 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 101 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 87 Organization member percentage obs Neither 60 371 Yes, in Naples 12 143 Yes, nationally 16 158 Both 12 158 Total 100 830 Key: percentage cell percentage obs = number of observations orgmemseason: 1. Are you or anyone in your household a member of any formal Jewish organizations or clubs where you (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 369 Number of PSUs = 369 Population size = 1,988.1329 Subpop. no. obs = 369 Subpop. size = 1,988.1329 Design df = 360 Organization member: seasonal percentage obs No 62 192 Yes 38 177 Total 100 369 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations orggroups: 1. Do you or anyone in your household belong to an informal Jewish group? (e.g., Mah Jongg group, Jewi (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 830 Number of PSUs = 830 Population size = 4,824.2838 Subpop. no. obs = 830 Subpop. size = 4,824.2838 Design df = 821 Group member percentage obs No 68 490 Yes 32 340 Total 100 830 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations orggroupsseason: 1. Are any of those groups based in the Greater Naples Jewish community? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 185 Number of PSUs = 185 Population size = 908.998692 Subpop. no. obs = 185 Subpop. size = 908.998692 Design df = 177 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 102 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 88 Group member: seasonal percentage obs No 27 47 Yes 73 138 Total 100 185 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 147 . 148 . foreach x of varlist orgdues_loc orgdues_nat orgdues_sec orgpart_loc orgpart_sec orgread_nat orgread_lo > sec volsupp_loc volsupp_nat volsupp_sec volpart_loc volpart_sec { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(respjewish): tab 'x', per format (o20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. ] orgdues_loc: 1. [Aside from a synagogue, did you pay dues to...] A Jewish organization in Greater Naples (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 793 Number of PSUs = 793 Population size = 4,645.2661 Subpop. no. obs = 791 Subpop. size = 4,637.0838 Design df = 784 Pays dues: Local percentage obs No 56 323 Yes 44 468 Total 100 791 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations orgdues_nat: 1. [Aside from a synagogue, did you pay dues to...] A national Jewish organization (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 762 Number of PSUs = 762 Population size = 4,572.2233 Subpop. no. obs = 760 Subpop. size = 4,564.041 Design df = 753 Pays dues: National percentage obs No 66 399 Yes 34 361 Total 100 760 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations orgdues_sec: 1. [Aside from a synagogue, did you pay dues to...] A Jewish organization where you have your othe (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 103 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 89 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 339 Number of PSUs = 339 Population size = 1,886.0833 Subpop. no. obs = 337 Subpop. size = 1,877.901 Design df = 330 Pays dues: Seasonal percentage obs No 51 140 Yes 49 197 Total 100 337 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations orgpart_loc: 1. [How often did you attend or participate in a program, event, or class (not religious services)?] i (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 807 Number of PSUs = 807 Population size = 4,698.0709 Subpop. no. obs = 805 Subpop. size = 4,689.8885 Design df = 798 Participated: Local percentage obs Never 41 168 Less than once a month 31 325 At least once a month 28 312 Total 100 805 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations orgpart_sec: 1. [How often did you attend or participate in a program, event, or class (not religious services)?] w (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 357 Number of PSUs = 357 Population size = 1,905.2977 Subpop. no. obs = 355 Subpop. size = 1,897.1153 Design df = 348 Participated: National percentage obs Never 36 104 Less than once a month 40 156 At least once a month 24 95 Total 100 355 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations orgread_nat: 1. [How often did you read material (e.g., newsletter, magazine, website, etc.)?] by a national Jewish (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 104 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 90 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 797 Number of PSUs = 797 Population size = 4,686.2989 Subpop. no. obs = 795 Subpop. size = 4,678.1166 Design df = 788 Read material: national percentage obs Never 30 122 Less than once a month 25 196 At least once a month 45 477 Total 100 795 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations orgread_loc: 1. [How often did you read material (e.g., newsletter, magazine, website, etc.)?] by a Greater Naples (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 803 Number of PSUs = 803 Population size = 4,691.9808 Subpop. no. obs = 801 Subpop. size = 4,683.7985 Design df = 794 Read material: Local percentage obs Never 31 130 Less than once a month 26 229 At least once a month 43 442 Total 100 801 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations orgread_sec: 1. [How often did you read material (e.g., newsletter, magazine, website, etc.)?] by a Jewish organiza (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 364 Number of PSUs = 364 Population size = 1,952.7518 Subpop. no. obs = 362 Subpop. size = 1,944.5695 Design df = 355 Read material: Seasonal percentage obs Never 28 80 Less than once a month 24 79 At least once a month 49 203 Total 100 362 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations volboard loc: 1. [Did you help in a leadership role (e.g., serve on a committee or board, plan an event or program)] (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 105 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 91 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 813 Number of PSUs = 813 Population size = 4,759.7316 Subpop. no. obs = 811 Subpop. size = 4,751.5493 Design df = 804 Board member: Local percentage obs No 84 597 Yes 16 214 Total 100 811 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations volboard_nat: 1. [Did you help in a leadership role (e.g., serve on a committee or board, plan an event or program)] (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 803 Number of PSUs = 803 Population size = 4,732.5379 Subpop. no. obs = 801 Subpop. size = 4,724.3555 Design df = 794 Board member: National percentage obs No 95 728 Yes 5 73 Total 100 801 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations volboard sec: 1. [Did you help in a leadership role (e.g., serve on a committee or board, plan an event or program)] other home (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 363 Number of PSUs = 363 Population size = 1,985.9061 Subpop. no. obs = 361 Subpop. size = 1,977.7238 Design df = 355 Board member: Seasonal percentage obs No 83 270 Yes 17 91 Total 100 361 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations volsupp_loc: 1. [Did you provide support services (e.g., raise funds, do administrative tasks)] for a Greater Naple (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 106 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 92 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 808 Number of PSUs = 808 Population size = 4,734.868 Subpop. no. obs = 806 Subpop. size = 4,726.6857 Design df = 799 Support service: Local percentage obs No 79 558 Yes 21 248 Total 100 806 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations volsupp_nat: 1. [Did you provide support services (e.g., raise funds, do administrative tasks)] For a national Jewi (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 796 Number of PSUs = 796 Population size = 4,634.4806 Subpop. no. obs = 794 Subpop. size = 4,626.2983 Design df = 787 Support service: National percentage obs No 91 684 Yes 9 110 Total 100 794 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations volsupp_sec: 1. [Did you provide support services (e.g., raise funds, do administrative tasks)] For a Jewish organi (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 365 Number of PSUs = 365 Population size = 1,983.9522 Subpop. no. obs = 363 Subpop. size = 1,975.7699 Design df = 357 Support service: Seasonal percentage obs No 79 265 Yes 21 98 Total 100 363 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations volpart_loc: 1. [In the past month, did you help as a participant (e.g., tutor, serve meals at a food pantry, park Naples Jewish organization (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 107 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 93 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 812 Number of PSUs = 812 Population size = 4,744.4129 Subpop. no. obs = 810 Subpop. size = 4,736.2305 Design df = 803 Vol participant: Local percentage obs No 86 656 Yes 14 154 Total 100 810 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations volpart_sec: 1. [In the past month, did you help as a participant (e.g., tutor, serve meals at a food pantry, park organization where you have your other home (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 367 Number of PSUs = 367 Population size = 1,975.4616 Subpop. no. obs = 365 Subpop. size = 1,967.2793 Design df = 358 Vol participant: Seasonal percentage obs No 93 328 Yes 7 37 Total 100 365 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 149 150 ********* 151 *Jewish Activities 152 ********* 153 foreach x of varlist actshabdin act_eat act_talk act_online act —culture act_text { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(respjewish): tab 'x', per format (o20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. 1 actshabdin: 1. In the past month, for how many weeks did you have or attend a special meal for Shabbat? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 810 Number of PSUs = 810 Population size = 4,705.2046 Subpop. no. obs = 808 Subpop. size = 4,697.0223 Design df = 801 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 108 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 94 Shabbat meal percentage obs Never 82 571 One week 10 127 Two or three times 5 60 Every week 4 50 Total 100 808 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations act eat: 1_[In the past month, how often did you participate in the following activities?] Eat traditional Jew (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 810 Number of PSUs = 810 Population size = 4,745.1992 Subpop. no. obs = 808 Subpop. size = 4,737.0169 Design df = 801 Activity: Food percentage obs Never 42 263 Once or twice 33 323 Once a week it ill Every few days 10 88 Once a day or more 3 23 Total 100 808 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations act talk: 1_[In the past month, how often did you participate in the following activities?] Talk about Jewish t (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 809 Number of PSUs = 809 Population size = 4,748.7215 Subpop. no. obs = 807 Subpop. size = 4,740.5392 Design df = 800 Activity: Talked percentage obs Never 14 54 Once or twice 35 223 Once a week 17 155 Every few days 22 237 Once a day or more 11 138 Total 100 807 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations act online: 1_[In the past month, how often did you participate in the following activities?] Look for Jewish inf (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 109 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 95 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 812 Number of PSUs = 812 Population size = 4,760.5975 Subpop. no. obs = 810 Subpop. size = 4,752.4152 Design df = 803 Activity: Internet percentage obs Never 39 235 Once or twice 25 197 Once a week 14 119 Every few days 10 137 Once a day or more 12 122 Total 100 810 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations act culture: 1_ [In the past month, how often did you participate in the following activities?] Access Jewish -focus (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 813 Number of PSUs = 813 Population size = 4,708.0882 Subpop. no. obs = 811 Subpop. size = 4,699.9059 Design df = 804 Activity: Culture percentage obs Never 51 293 Once or twice 28 269 Once a week 8 94 Every few days 7 97 Once a day or more 6 58 Total 100 811 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations act text: 1_ [In the past month, how often did you participate in the following activities?] Study a Jewish reli (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 818 Number of PSUs = 818 Population size = 4,772.0878 Subpop. no. obs = 816 Subpop. size = 4,763.9054 Design df = 809 Activity: Study percentage obs Never 79 571 Once or twice 10 108 Once a week 5 85 Every few days 2 34 Once a day or more 3 18 Total 100 816 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 110 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 96 154 155 ********* 156 *Philanthropy 157 ********* 158 foreach x of varlist charany charjew charlocal charorg_syn charorg_fed charorg_jed charorg_sery charorg 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(respjewish): tab 'x', per format (o20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. } charany: 1. Over the past year, did you make any charitable donations? Please include donations to both Jewish (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 811 Number of PSUs = 811 Population size = 4,738.0423 Subpop. no. obs = 809 Subpop. size = 4,729.86 Design df = 802 Any donation last year percentage obs No 8 38 Yes 92 771 Total 100 809 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations charjew: 1. Over the past year, which of the following best describes the charities to which you made monetary (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 770 Number of PSUs = 770 Population size = 4,361.8914 Subpop. no. obs = 768 Subpop. size = 4,353.709 Design df = 761 Type of donated orgs percentage obs All Jewish 5 34 Mostly Jewish 29 292 About equal 29 276 Mostly non-Jewish 23 135 All non-Jewish 13 31 Total 100 768 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations charlocal: 1. How many of the Jewish organizations you donated to are based in Greater Naples? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 739 Number of PSUs = 739 Population size = 3,778.9787 Subpop. no. obs = 737 Subpop. size = 3,770.7963 Design df = 730 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 111 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 97 Location of donated J orgs percentage obs None 28 109 Some 48 436 Most 10 104 All 13 88 Total 100 737 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations charorg_syn: 1. [Over the past year, have you made charitable contributions to...] A synagogue aside from dues (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 728 Number of PSUs = 728 Population size = 3,722.3931 Subpop. no. obs = 726 Subpop. size = 3,714.2108 Design df = 719 Donated to a synagogue percentage obs No 45 198 Yes 55 528 Total 100 726 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations charorg_fed: 1. [Over the past year, have you made charitable contributions to...] Jewish Federation of Collier (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 724 Number of PSUs = 724 Population size = 3,743.9288 Subpop. no. obs = 722 Subpop. size = 3,735.7465 Design df = 715 Donated to federation percentage obs No 40 192 Yes 60 530 Total 100 722 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations charorg_jed: 1. [Over the past year, have you made charitable contributions to...] A Jewish school or camp (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 686 Number of PSUs = 686 Population size = 3,596.1924 Subpop. no. obs = 684 Subpop. size = 3,588.01 Design df = 677 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 112 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 98 Donated to Jewish education percentage obs No 87 558 Yes 13 126 Total 100 684 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations charorg_serv: 1. [Over the past year, have you made charitable contributions to...] Jewish Family & Community Se (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 698 Number of PSUs = 698 Population size = 3,632.0891 Subpop. no. obs = 696 Subpop. size = 3,623.9067 Design df = 689 Donated to Jewish social services percentage obs No 77 453 Yes 23 243 Total 100 696 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations charorg_oth: 1. [Over the past year, have you made charitable contributions to...] Another Jewish organization (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 718 Number of PSUs = 718 Population size = 3,690.2953 Subpop. no. obs = 716 Subpop. size = 3,682.113 Design df = 709 Donated to Other percentage obs No 49 318 Yes 51 398 Total 100 716 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations charreq: 1. In the past year, did you receive any requests to make charitable donations to Jewish organizations (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 801 Number of PSUs = 801 Population size = 4,745.8169 Subpop. no. obs = 799 Subpop. size = 4,737.6345 Design df = 792 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 113 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 99 Receive request to donate percentage obs No 42 189 Yes 58 610 Total 100 799 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations charinc: 1. In the coming year, do you expect your charitable giving, both in- and outside the Jewish com (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 805 Number of PSUs = 805 Population size = 4,650.039 Subpop. no. obs = 803 Subpop. size = 4,641.8567 Design df = 796 Plan to increase giving percentage obs Increase 13 138 Stay the same 75 630 Decrease 12 35 Total 100 803 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations charwill: 1. Have you designated any Jewish organization in Greater Naples as a beneficiary in your will or esta (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 807 Number of PSUs = 807 Population size = 4,746.205 Subpop. no. obs = 805 Subpop. size = 4,738.0226 Design df = 798 Bequest or will percentage obs No 93 735 Yes 4 47 I don t have a will 3 23 Total 100 805 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 114 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 100 159 . 160 . note 1 charorg othtxt charorg_othtxt: 1. What is that other organization? 161 . count if charorg_othtxt!=" & hhjewish==1 364 162 163 ********* 164 *Health & Well -Being 165 ********* 166 foreach x of varlist hlpar hlparloc hlparnh hlhealthad hlhealthkid hlment hlimpfunc hlhskpg hljewlife { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab 'x', per format (o20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. } hlpar: 1. Do you for your spouse or partner) manage care or personally provide care on a regular basis for an own? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 531 Number of PSUs = 531 Population size = 3,085.1033 Subpop. no. obs = 531 Subpop. size = 3,085.1033 Design df = 522 Care for elderly relative percentage obs No 88 449 Yes 12 82 Total 100 531 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hlparloc: 1. Do they live in the Greater Naples area? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 81 Number of PSUs = 81 Population size = 367.477251 Subpop. no. obs = 81 Subpop. size = 367.477251 Design df = 73 In Naples percentage obs No 65 47 Yes 35 34 Total 100 81 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hlparnh: 1. Do you for your spouse or partner) have a parent who is currently a resident of an independent livi (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 115 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 101 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 531 Number of PSUs = 531 Population size = 3,096.7894 Subpop. no. obs = 531 Subpop. size = 3,096.7894 Design df = 522 Parent in senior housing percentage obs No 88 458 Yes, in Greater Naples 4 24 Yes, elsewhere 7 48 Yes, both 0 1 Total 100 531 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hlhealthad: 1. Are any adults in your household in fair or poor health? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 638 Number of PSUs = 638 Population size = 3,569.9905 Subpop. no. obs = 638 Subpop. size = 3,569.9905 Design df = 629 HH adult in fair/poor health percentage obs No 87 558 Yes 13 80 Total 100 638 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hlhealthkid: 1. Are there any children in the household in fair or poor health? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 57 Number of PSUs = 57 Population size = 286.651685 Subpop. no. obs = 57 Subpop. size = 286.651685 Design df = 51 HH child in fair/poor health percentage obs No 99 56 Yes 1 1 Total 100 57 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hlment: 1. During the past year, were counseling or other mental health services needed for anyone in your hou (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 116 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 102 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 794 Number of PSUs = 794 Population size = 4,712.1463 Subpop. no. obs = 794 Subpop. size = 4,712.1463 Design df = 785 Mental health & counseling percentage obs No 90 708 Yes, and they were received 9 72 Yes, but they were not receive 1 14 Total 100 794 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hlimpfunc: 1. Do you or anyone in your household have impaired function due to an intellectual, developmental, or (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 788 Number of PSUs = 788 Population size = 4,663.3762 Subpop. no. obs = 788 Subpop. size = 4,663.3762 Design df = 779 Impaired function percentage obs No 90 700 Yes 10 88 Total 100 788 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hlhskpg: 1. Do you or anyone in your household need assistance with housekeeping and home maintenance? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 788 Number of PSUs = 788 Population size = 4,695.3518 Subpop. no. obs = 788 Subpop. size = 4,695.3518 Design df = 779 Housekeeping percentage obs No 87 714 Yes, and it was received 11 61 Yes, but it was not received 2 13 Total 100 788 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hljewlife: 1. In the past year, were you for anyone in your household} ever unable to participate in Jewish life (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 117 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 103 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 799 Number of PSUs = 799 Population size = 4,746.2905 Subpop. no. obs = 799 Subpop. size = 4,746.2905 Design df = 790 Health prohibited Jewish life percentage obs No 80 629 Yes 6 47 Does not apply 13 123 Total 100 799 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 167 . 168 . foreach x of varlist hlrespnh hlhealthresp { 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(respjewish): tab 'x', per format (o20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. } hlrespnh: 1. Do you currently reside in an independent living, assisted living facility, or nursing home? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 599 Number of PSUs = 599 Population size = 3,800.3333 Subpop. no. obs = 597 Subpop. size = 3,792.1509 Design df = 591 R in senior housing percentage obs No 94 557 Yes 6 40 Total 100 597 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations hlhealthresp: 1. Are you in fair or poor health? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 796 Number of PSUs = 796 Population size = 4,636.6187 Subpop. no. obs = 794 Subpop. size = 4,628.4364 Design df = 787 R in fair/poor health percentage obs No 84 696 Yes 16 98 Total 100 794 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 118 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 104 169 . note 1 hljewlifetxt hljewlifetxt: 1. In what way? 170 . count if hljewlifetxt!=" " & hhjewish==1 41 171 172 ********* 173 *Finances 174 ********* 175 foreach x of varlist wbemp_full wbemp_part wbemp retire wbemp_unemp wbemp_look wbstan wbinc wbaid_retir > lth wbhard_job wbhard_pay wbhard_fore wbhard_business wbhard_divorce wbhard_death wbrent wbsaveexp wbje 2. note 1 x' 3. svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. } wbemp full: 1. [Including yourself, how many adults in your household are Working full-time for pay (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 590 Number of PSUs = 590 Population size = 3,705.4253 Subpop. no. obs = 590 Subpop. size = 3,705.4253 Design df = 581 Ct full-time workers percentage obs 0 74 394 1 21 143 2 6 52 3 0 1 Total 100 590 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbemp_part: 1. [Including yourself, how many adults in your household are Working part-time for pay (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 548 Number of PSUs = 548 Population size = 3,588.8313 Subpop. no. obs = 548 Subpop. size = 3,588.8313 Design df = 539 Ct part-time workers percentage obs 0 78 401 1 20 128 2 2 17 3 0 1 10 0 1 Total 100 548 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 119 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 105 wbemp_retire: 1. [Including yourself, how many adults in your household are Retired (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 697 Number of PSUs = 697 Population size = 4,277.5258 Subpop. no. obs = 697 Subpop. size = 4,277.5258 Design df = 688 Ct retiree percentage obs 0 12 82 1 38 251 2 50 360 3 0 1 7 0 1 8 0 1 10 0 1 Total 100 697 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbemp unemp: 1. [Including yourself, how many adults in your household are Unemployed (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 498 Number of PSUs = 498 Population size = 3,311.4756 Subpop. no. obs = 498 Subpop. size = 3,311.4756 Design df = 489 Ct unemployed percentage obs 0 94 454 1 5 32 2 1 11 3 0 1 Total 100 498 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbemp_look: 1. [Including yourself, how many adults in your household are Currently looking for work (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 505 Number of PSUs = 505 Population size = 3,328.4044 Subpop. no. obs = 505 Subpop. size = 3,328.4044 Design df = 496 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 120 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 106 Looking for work percentage obs 0 96 476 1 3 26 2 0 2 3 0 1 Total 100 505 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbstan: 1. Which of the following words or phrases best describes your household's standard of living? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 769 Number of PSUs = 769 Population size = 4,608.2004 Subpop. no. obs = 769 Subpop. size = 4,608.2004 Design df = 760 Standard of living percentage obs Prosperous 15 139 Living very comfortably 47 360 Living reasonably comfortably 31 215 Just getting along 5 45 Nearly poor 1 6 Poor 1 4 Total 100 769 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbinc: 1. {Not including roommates but counting everyone else who lives in the household,} Was your hou (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 756 Number of PSUs = 756 Population size = 4,517.8886 Subpop. no. obs = 756 Subpop. size = 4,517.8886 Design df = 747 Income percentage obs Less than $25,000 3 15 $25,000-49,999 13 32 $50,000-74,999 8 48 $75,000-99,999 5 50 $100,000-149,999 11 91 $150,000-199,999 9 63 $200,000 or more 16 146 I prefer not to answer 35 311 Total 100 756 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 121 Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 107 wbaid_retirement: 1. [Are you or anyone in your household currently receiving any of the following:] Social Security ret (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 770 Number of PSUs = 770 Population size = 4,590.7092 Subpop. no. obs = 770 Subpop. size = 4,590.7092 Design df = 761 Receive Soc Security/Medicare percentage obs No 16 148 Yes 84 622 Total 100 770 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbaid_subsidies: 1. [Are you or anyone in your household currently receiving any of the following:] Medicaid, food stam assistance (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 741 Number of PSUs = 741 Population size = 4,412.6629 Subpop. no. obs = 741 Subpop. size = 4,412.6629 Design df = 732 Receive Medicaid, food stamps percentage obs No 99 734 Yes 1 7 Total 100 741 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbaid_supplement: 1. [Are you or anyone in your household currently receiving any of the following:] Social Securi Income (SSI) (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 740 Number of PSUs = 740 Population size = 4,386.1402 Subpop. no. obs = 740 Subpop. size = 4,386.1402 Design df = 731 Receive SSDI percentage obs No 97 708 Yes 3 32 Total 100 740 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 122 Tuesday September 12 09:37:28 2017 Page 108 wbhard_health: 1. [Did you or anyone in your household experience any of the following economic hardships in the past (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 774 Number of PSUs = 774 Population size = 4,558.4036 Subpop. no. obs = 774 Subpop. size = 4,558.4036 Design df = 765 Hardship: health emergency percentage obs No 86 674 Yes 14 100 Total 100 774 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbhard_job: 1. [Did you or anyone in your household experience any of the following economic hardships in the past (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 766 Number of PSUs = 766 Population size = 4,530.8622 Subpop. no. obs = 766 Subpop. size = 4,530.8622 Design df = 757 Hardship: lost job percentage obs No 99 749 Yes 1 17 Total 100 766 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbhard_pay : 1. [Did you or anyone in your household experience any of the following economic hardships in the past (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 769 Number of PSUs = 769 Population size = 4,547.5268 Subpop. no. obs = 769 Subpop. size = 4,547.5268 Design df = 760 Hardship: reduced pay percentage obs No 97 748 Yes 3 21 Total 100 769 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbhard fore: 1. [Did you or anyone in your household experience any of the following economic hardships in the past (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 123 Tuesday September 12 09:37:28 2017 Page 109 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 766 Number of PSUs = 766 Population size = 4,537.7082 Subpop. no. obs = 766 Subpop. size = 4,537.7082 Design df = 757 Hardship: foreclosure percentage obs No 100 762 Yes 0 4 Total 100 766 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbhard_business: 1. [Did you or anyone in your household experience any of the following economic hardships in the past difficulty (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 766 Number of PSUs = 766 Population size = 4,439.6231 Subpop. no. obs = 766 Subpop. size = 4,439.6231 Design df = 757 Hardshp: business closed percentage obs No 98 747 Yes 2 19 Total 100 766 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbhard divorce: 1. [Did you or anyone in your household experience any of the following economic hardships in the past (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 767 Number of PSUs = 767 Population size = 4,442.5199 Subpop. no. obs = 767 Subpop. size = 4,442.5199 Design df = 758 Hardship: Divorce percentage obs No 99 760 Yes 1 7 Total 100 767 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbhard_death: 1. [Did you or anyone in your household experience any of the following economic hardships in the past (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 124 Tuesday September 12 09:37:28 2017 Page 110 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 762 Number of PSUs = 762 Population size = 4,441.5672 Subpop. no. obs = 762 Subpop. size = 4,441.5672 Design df = 753 Hardship: Death percentage obs No 97 744 Yes 3 18 Total 100 762 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbrent: 1. In the last year, did you ever have to skip a rent, mortgage, or utility bill payment because you c (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 769 Number of PSUs = 769 Population size = 4,549.2045 Subpop. no. obs = 769 Subpop. size = 4,549.2045 Design df = 760 Skip rent percentage obs No 99 754 Yes 1 15 Total 100 769 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbsaveexp: 1. Would you{r household} be able to pay an unexpected $400 emergency expense with cash, money current could pay in full? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 764 Number of PSUs = 764 Population size = 4,543.9118 Subpop. no. obs = 764 Subpop. size = 4,543.9118 Design df = 755 Unexpected expense percentage obs No 5 37 Yes 95 727 Total 100 764 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbjewlife: 1. In the past year, were you {or anyone in your household} ever unable to participate in Jewish life (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 125 Tuesday September 12 09:37:28 2017 Page 111 Number of strata = 9 Number of PSUs = 777 Number of obs = 777 Population size = 4,622.2197 Subpop. no. obs = 777 Subpop. size = 4,622.2197 Design df = 768 Finances prohibited Jewish life percentage obs No 87 678 Yes 4 39 Does not apply 9 60 Total 100 777 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 176 . 177 . foreach x of varlist wbcol wbret 2. note 1 'x' 3. svy, subpop(respjewish): tab 'x', per format (%20.Ofc) stubw(30) obs 4. ) wbcol: 1. Overall, how confident are you that you {and your spouse or partner} will have enough money to prov (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 49 Number of PSUs = 49 Population size = 246.880096 Subpop. no. obs = 47 Subpop. size = 238.697768 Design df = 43 Saving for college percentage obs Not at all confident 7 6 Not very confident 1 2 Uncertain 15 6 Somewhat confident 48 21 Very confident 28 12 Total 100 47 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations wbret: 1. Overall, how confident are you that you {and your spouse or partner} will have enough money to live (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 772 Number of PSUs = 772 Population size 4,601.7126 Subpop. no. obs = 770 Subpop. size = 4,593.5302 Design df = 763 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 126 Tuesday September 12 09:37:28 2017 Page 112 Saving for retirement percentage obs Not at all confident 3 22 Not very confident 1 12 Uncertain 11 80 Somewhat confident 37 278 Very confident 47 378 Total 100 770 Key: percentage = cell percentage obs = number of observations 178 . 179 . note 1 wbjewlifetxt wbjewlifetxt: 1. In what way? 180 . count if wbjewlifetxt!=" & hhjewish==1 31 181 182 ********* 183 *Concluding Thoughts 184 ********* 185 foreach x of varlist ctstr ctgap ctjorgs { 2. note 1 'x' 3. count if 'x'!=" & hhjewish==1 4. } ctstr: 1. Overall, what do you consider to be the strengths of the Greater Naples Jewish community? 580 ctgap: 1. Overall, what programs, services, or organizations do you think are missing from the Greater Naples 486 ctjorgs: 1. What could local Jewish organizations do, if anything, to make you feel more welcome in the Greater 443 186 187 log close name: log: log type: closed on: <unnamed> Z:\Naples - Collier County\Report\6-Codebook & Instrument\Codebook - Frequencies.smcl smcl 12 Sep 2017, 09:36:26 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 127 Appendix C: Study Documentation 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 128 Caller Training Protocol Brandeis University Calling Training For The Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies Greater Naples Community Study 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 129 Purpose of Study This study is designed to learn about the lives of Jews living in the Greater Naples Area. The study will provide a description of the size and character of Naples -area Jewry. Study Mode This is a dual -mode study. Respondents are first contacted by e-mail. If e-mail contact fails, they are then contacted by phone. Your goal is to remind the respondents to do the survey online or to do it with you on the phone. This is a household study, so any adult in the household who is age 18 or over and related to the respondent is eligible to complete the survey. Calling Schedule Calls will be made Monday -Thursday from 6:00-9:OOpm and on Sunday afternoons from 12:00- 4:00pm. On Sundays the building is sometimes locked. If this is the case, call the supervisor so they can let you in. Callbacks and/or daytime calling can be scheduled for any workday from 9:OOam-5:OOpm. We DO NOT make calls on Friday nights or on Saturdays. Using the CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing system) Note on confidentiality: All information contained in the CATI or gathered during an interview is private and confidential. Do not access the CATI outside of work or for any purpose. Do not share information from the CATI with anyone. The phone numbers and a -mails were provided by the respondent with the understanding that we would maintain their privacy. We do not give out, share, or sell anyone's information. We only use this information to try to reach people selected to participate in this study. To access the CATI, go to cc.cmjs.org. Click "Click here to log in now" and enter your e-mail and password. If you do not know your password, click the link under "If you are a registered user and have forgotten your password, click here." You can check the box marked "automatically log me in next time" to make it easier in the future. Once you've logged in, click on "Surveys" (on the top left), then on "Start Calling" (on the left bar). 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 130 Calling Lists You will then see your calling list — a list of respondent names, their last directive, last directive comment, and the time zone of the phone numbers in that case. File Edit View History Bookmarks Tools Help - C x -fi [eo https:jtce cmjs.orgjCaLiMemberslndlvidualCaller cfm t(- - a on lansky road map Most Visited ❑ Getting Started 1 Latest Headlines Brandeis university Mail - Inbox - block... ® CIN Start Calling - [CM]S Companion] ® + Snrvey� Start Calling I CATI I Start Calling San 1UN—lor Callen ❑ina Bleckman Sur wL'st Study Admin November 22, 2011 Start Call Call Superr CATI Main Coll 1: BRI Marriane Lure Follow-un Bndate Call 2: Response Report Bispos Iry Surrey Am, DmnnlSurrev Call 3: Call Back Report r�Commmicatim Call 4: CreateSury d Calls: Ceti Summary Call b: Can Callers Done Case Cleaned .'tail anld phone ndimber.me of survey In 2010 when .mailed it, good EST Case cleaned Potential-1. All we hare is email for rose that's not confirmed' EST search potential=0. resp was already searched. Potential=2. We have a m6er with resp n eln VM But have e Case cleaned ached rep in o... or 2a10. The email lookslike it's for resp but es EST on ..I email. Search potential-1. Potential=2. we have a work n tuber for resp., and a number that Case cleaned looks lilk. it showld r.ach his off'. in g.n.ral, and a c.11 q that EST -2 , EST -3 orked s ral times & then w s dis--lea also an email that might work. search potential=o. we ae alrea Case cleaned Potential=1. No good contact info. Can message through uT alomol EST -2 a recmry.Search potentia1=1. Potential=2. We have a home number For her & her h—b.hd's cell Case cleaned phone number, hew sn't super hel PFul &wouldn't glr. any info for EST her. also we haven ail address for her. search potential=o, she has already been searched. Search Desktop Directives: The yellow arrow points to the Directive column. A directive is a one word summary of that case's history. Once a case has been called more than once (later on in the survey), cases will also have directives of: Keep in Calling Rotation — Nothing special happened; we need to keep calling the person. Call Back Later — The person needs to be called back at a specific time. Daytime Call — The person needs to be called during the day (often used for work phone numbers). Language Barrier — The person reached does not speak/understand English. Hard Refusal — We reached the person we need, and they said that they do not want to participate. No Good Phone Numbers — All of the phone numbers we have for the person are not helpful (wrong number, disconnected, etc.) Supervisor Review — Something was unclear about the case and we wanted a supervisor to look into it. These three directives should NEVER be in a call list. If they are, tell the supervisor. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 131 Info: Next to the directives column is the info column, which has 2 green arrows over it. This tells you a slightly longer summary of the case's history and will tell you WHY the previous caller picked the directive that they did. Always read the info column. The directive and directive info will NOT be visible once you click the "start" button and begin your call, so you MUST read them thoroughly beforehand. Time Zone: Next to the Info column is the Time Zone column, which has an orange arrow over it. Check to see if the time zone of the call that you are placing is listed. We do not call people before 9 AM their time or after 9 PM their time. When starting your list, first look for Call Back Later directives and make sure you note what time to call them. While waiting to make any scheduled "call back laters," start from the top of your list and work your way down. To begin calling your list, click on the "start" button next to the respondent's first name. Mf ever you are unsure about what the goal of a call is, or of what you should be doing, talk to your supervisor before placing a call!! 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 132 l M Inbox - blecknnanlbmnd4.% j� ❑ Call Rgpondent - [ChM' % C Lj tfisher-pc./catilocal/catiCallRespondent.cfm?idCo mmunication=1771&idAdminPanelMain =1655547 LINet Login ® Horde Log in M Old CATI M CMJS Companion D Testing CATI O" CMJ5 Home T Old Lime Y New Lime [� Birthright Database I `i Serve® Call Respondent Surveys n CATI n Call Respondent sampl® Respondent Information - Survev List Stu dy Atlm in Start Calling Call Supervision CATI Main BRI Marriage survey Survey Status: None Follow-up Update Response Report Dis Dos by Survey Elnail Address Any Di s po1Su rvev Call Back Report Antero Test r Choose Directive Response Report Communications 3 Create Survey • Cati Summa Cati Callers Getting Started Style Library Dispositions found: 2001 3irth date: 06-29-1975 Sender: Female Type Respondent Participant status: participant Token: H193P241K Gift amount: 25 Gift status: Comment: -1=1 Cali History 239-- Admin. Nihan Celiktas. Friday, Jul 20, 2012, 10:51 AM. Administrative. Admin comment. supposedly Work number for brother, doesnt reach anyone in 2012. 360-- Admin. Nihan Celiktas. Friday, Jul 20, 2012. 10:49 AM. Administrative. Admin comment. Found on PhonesAlus for resp cell. the greeting said the name of the resp in 2012. 910-- Admin. Nihan Celiktas. Friday, Jul 20, 2012, 10:47 AM. Administrative. Admin comment. Found on Rccurint for home phone of the resp (shared address with left a vm on unideatiifed answering machine in 2012. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 133 Basic Respondent Information Once you have clicked on the START button next to a person's name, you will see the respondent's CATI calling page. You will see the respondent's name in a large box on the left. If you discover during the course of a phone call that a respondent has changed his/her name or goes by a nickname, mark the directive as a Supervisor Review and describe the change that needs to be made in your comments (the supervisor will make the change). Next to the name box, you will see the following information (dark red arrow): Household name: The family name of the people in this household. You can use this when making calls, i.e., "I'm calling the Goldberg household; may I please speak with Joseph or Sarah?" Additional family names: This is a list of additional names associated with this household; the names of anyone else who lives in the home —this could be spouses, parents, adult children, or any other relatives. Token: This is the unique number we use to identify each respondent. Survey Status (green arrow) Under the respondent's name, you will see the status of the survey: "None," "Partial" or "Complete." A status of "Partial" means that the respondent began the survey but did not finish it. For cases like these, you will use an altered phone script to encourage the respondent to finish the survey. There is no need to call the respondent if the survey status says Complete. You will also see a banner in red font that looks like this: Attention: This person has completed the survey since this sample was created. There is no need to call them unless otherwise instructed. You may close this record. It is CRITICAL to check the status of survey completion before you pick up the phone. Partial Surveys You may have a respondent on your list who has completed part of the survey already. His/her survey status will say "partial survey." Please mark these as "Supervisor review" and do not call them for the time being. E-mail Addresses (orange arrow) Below the Survey Status, you will see the e-mail addresses that we have for the respondent. Some people will have many e-mails listed, and some people will not have any e-mails at all. For many people this means that we only have information that we think is good, but for some people it means that we are left without any e-mail addresses at all. In these cases, one of the goals of the phone call is to get an active e-mail address for the respondent, since we cannot send them a survey without their e-mail. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 134 If there are e-mails listed, each one will fall into one of three categories: Respondent, Parent, or Other. These categories do not apply, they are simply a way to list the emails associated with the household. When deciding what e-mail address to send an e-mail to, make sure to look closely at the e-mail addresses to see if you can tell if it's the respondent's e-mail or not. For example, if the e-mail address has the respondent's initials or name in it, then you CAN e-mail that one even if it's marked `other.'If there is any doubt, ask a supervisor. Do not send emails to email addresses that are marked as bounced. Call History (purple arrow) Call history is ordered by phone number. Each phone number will have a history of what happened every time that that number was called in the past. The history of each call has information about which caller made the call, when the call was made, the call outcome, and the call outcome comment. Just as a directive is a one -word summary of what happened in the entire attempt to reach a particular person, a call outcome is a short summary of what happened during that particular phone call. Possible call outcomes include: Hard Refusal — We reached the person we need, and they said that they do not want to participate. Soft Refusal — We reached the person we need, and they said they were too busy/seemed uninterested, but there is reason to think that they could be convinced to do the survey. Call Back Later — We reached someone who told us to call back later to reach the respondent. VM on Identified Machine — We left a voicemail on a machine that identified the respondent by name, or we know that this is the correct number for the respondent from someone else. VM on Identified Machine + E-mail — We left a voicemail on the identified machine of the respondent and sent an e-mail to the respondent. Will Pass Message to Respondent — We reached someone who said that they will pass the message to the respondent. VM on Confirmed Other Answering Machine — We left a voicemail on a machine that clearly stated a name, other than the respondent's in the message. Language Barrier — We reached someone who does not speak English. Sent E-mail — We sent an e-mail to the respondent. Gave New Number — We reached someone who gave us a new number for the respondent. Disconnected — We reached a number that is disconnected. Rings Out — We reached a number that just keeps ringing without a voicemail. Wrong number — We reached someone who told us that we have the wrong number. Busy Signal — We reached a busy signal. Fax Number — We reached a fax machine. Automated VM — We reached a voicemail machine that does not have a person's name in the message. VM Full — We reached a message that says that the voicemail box is full. Not Accepting Calls/VM Not Set Up — We reached a message that the number is not accepting messages or that the voicemail box is full. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 135 Message with New Number — We reached a message that says that the number we have is wrong, but lists a new number. Next to each call outcome will be a call outcome comment, which will provide detailed information of what happened during that call. It is critical to read the call history for each case before placing a call. For example, do not call people on a Tuesday if the call outcome says 'please call back on a Wednesday or Thursday, not a Monday or Tuesday. " Sometimes there will also be Administrative Comments in the call history. These comments consist of important information that was added to the history by Sarah or a supervisor. Pay special attention to these comments because they may correct or explain some other aspect of the call history. Example: 512-555-5555 1st attempt. Sarah Harpaz. Wed, Jun 24, 2015. 7:43pm. Wrong Number. Reached the home number for the [redacted] family, they said they had never heard of the respondent and that they moved in two years ago. We cannot reach the respondent or their family here, do not call again. Admin. Viktoria Bedo. Thurs, Jun 25, 2015. 9:45am. Admin Comment. [Redacted] family called us back, gave us new number for the respondent. 512-555-5555 1st attempt. Sarah Harpaz. Wed, June 24, 2015. 7:40 pm. No contact. Number rings out. 2nd attempt. Shahar Hecht. Tue, July 7, 2015. 7:57 pm. Respondent Contact. Requested Call Back for July 8, 2010 at 5:00 pm EDT. Spoke with [redacted] and he's willing to do the survey. I scheduled a call back. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE READ THE CALL HISTORY BEFORE PLACING EACH AND EVERY CALL!! AFTER reading the entire call history, click on the button labeled "Call" to begin the call. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 136 Placing a Call Dial 8 + I + AREA CODE + 7-DIGIT NUMBER. The calling code for this project is [redacted]. Before you place a call, make sure you know what time it is at the destination you are calling. Placing a Call to Canada Dial 8 + 1+ XXX (area code) — XXX-XXY—X (7-digit number). The calling code for this project is [redacted]. Before you place a call, make sure you know what time it is at the destination you are calling. How to Dial an International Number Dial 8-011-COUNTRY CODE -the number, then, when prompted, enter long-distance access code as usual. 8 tells Brandeis that you want an outside line. 011 tells the phone company that you are dialing another country. The country code, e.g., 972 for Israel, tells the phone company which country you are dialing. If a number in the CATI is missing its country code, just Google "Austria country code" and you will find it easily. The rest of the number is country -specific, but will usually include an area code of some sort plus a phone number. Often, you will have to leave off a leading 0 in an area code. For example, within Israel, you would dial 054-999-8888 for a cell phone, but from the United States you would dial 011-972-54-999-8888. There is often a long pause between dialing the number and the voice asking for the access code. Do not give up. Wait patiently. The ringing sound can vary from country to country. Israel's ringing sound is more of a beep, which sounds a little like a drawn out busy signal to the uninitiated, so check with a supervisor before marking a number as disconnected or busy. E-mail Only Some cases will only have an e-mail address available. If there is only an email in a case that has been assigned to you, mark the case `supervisor review' and make it clear in your comment that there is only an email address for that respondent. A supervisor will take care of that case. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 137 Contact Protocol The script below is intended to be a starting point rather than something you must read word-for- word on every occasion. You should adjust what you say depending on your sense of the person you are speaking to. Above all, sound like an upbeat person, not a recorded message! Hello, is this the [HOUSEHOLD NAME] residence? (Start every scenario off like this unless for some reason you are not trying to reach the household. It is not necessary that we reach the respondent per say, but any adult in that household who can complete the survey.) If seems not known at this phone number [Probe for information:] Do you know where I can reach them? If not known: Thank you very much. If known but doesn't live there: Hi, my name is [ ], and I'm calling from Brandeis University. How are you doing today? We are conducting a study of Jewish adults who live in the Greater Naples area for at least part of the year. We would like to contact the [HOUSEHOLD NAME] family to participate in our study. Would you be able to give me a phone number or email address to reach them? If lives at this number but is unavailable: Hi, my name is [ ], and I'm calling from Brandeis University. How are you doing today? We are conducting a study of Jewish adults who live in the Greater Naples area for at least part of the year. What is the best way for me to get in touch with an adult in that household? [Get a call back time, other phone number, or email address to send the survey link.] *Try to get a phone number (including overseas numbers) or e-mail! Otherwise schedule a call back* If person reached does not speak English: If you recognize the language he/she speaks and there is a caller who speaks that language close by, hand over the call to that caller. Otherwise say, "I will ask a colleague who speaks [foreign language] to call you later." Mark case with a call outcome and directive of Language Barrier. Make sure you note in your comments what language you think the caller needs to be able to speak when calling back. You reach a workplace: Hi, my name is [ ], and I am calling from Brandeis University. We are trying to reach [RESPONDENT] with regard to a study that we are conducting. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 138 [If respondent no longer works there]: Would you be able to give me their forwarding contact information? [If respondent currently works there but is unavailable]: Would you be able to ask them to give us a call back at 781-736-2964 or email us at n-a-p-l-e-s@brandeis.edu? If respondent: We are conducting a study of Jewish adults that live in the Greater Naples area for at least part of the year, on behalf of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. The survey will take about 25 minutes to complete. Your participation in the survey is entirely voluntary. If you wish, you may decline to answer specific questions and you may conclude the survey at any point with no obligation. If you have 25 minutes now, I'm happy to do it with you over the phone. Are you at least 18 years old? [If no, explain that participants must be at least 18 years old, see if there is another person in the household who is 18 or older who can complete the survey. If not apologize, thank them for their time. Ask: "What is the best way for me to get in touch with an adult in your household?" Leave a message or ask for a time to call back to reach an adult or email address.] [If response is yes, verify that they are not driving before you start with the first question] I will be reading the survey questions and response options to you and then will record your responses. Please listen to each question carefully and answer the best you can. May I start with the first question? [If response is no, ask for updated email address or confirm existing email address] Okay, I can send you a link by email. Can you confirm that your email address is [spell out the email address listed for the Respondent]? If respondent has partially completed the survey: Hi, my name is [ ], and I'm calling from Brandeis University. We see that you received our pre -notification letter or email and started filling out our survey for the 2017 Greater Naples area Jewish Community Study. I wanted to call to thank you for participating in the survey. Would you like me to email you another link so that it is fresh in your inbox or would you like to complete the rest of the survey over the phone? If unwilling/unable to take the survey at this point: Is there a better time when we could call you? [Be mindful of our calling hour limits. Try to press for a specific time.] Or Can I email you the survey so you can complete it online when you have a chance? 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 139 [To ask for their email address] What's the best email to reach you? [Read it back to them to confirm it.] Leaving Voice -mail for Participants 1st attempt: "Hi, my name is [ ], and I'm calling from Brandeis University [to follow up with you about an e-mail we sent you]. We are conducting a study of Jewish adults that live in the Greater Naples area for at least part of the year, on behalf of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. I'm going to e-mail the survey to you now to the e-mail address we have for you on file. We hope you'll participate! If you have any questions, or would like to schedule to take the survey over the phone, please call Sarah Harpaz at 781-736-2964 or e-mail us at naples@brandeis.edu, that's`n-a-p-l-e-s@-b-r-a-n-d-e-i-s.e-d-u.' Thank you and have a great day!" 2"d attempt and beyond: "Hi, my name is [ ], and I'm calling from Brandeis University [to follow up with you about an e-mail we sent you]. We are still trying to get in touch with you regarding our study of Jewish adults that live in the Greater Naples area for at least part of the year, on behalf of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. I'm going to e-mail the survey to you again now to the e- mail address we have on file for you. We hope you'll participate! If you have any questions, or would like to schedule to take the survey over the phone, please call Sarah Harpaz at 781-736- 2964 or e-mail us at naples@brandeis.edu that's`n-a-p-l-e-s@-b-r-a-n-d-e-i-s.e-d-u.' Thank you and have a great day!" If Unsure Whether Voice -mail Belongs to Respondent: 1st attempt: "Hi, I'm calling from Brandeis University. I'm trying to get in touch with the [HOUSEHOLD NAME] family. I'm calling [to follow up with them about an e-mail] regarding a research study we sent them recently. If you have any questions or if we've called this number by mistake, please call Sarah Harpaz at 781-736-2964 or e-mail us at naplesnbrandeis.edu that's `n-a-p-1-e- s@-b-r-a-n-d-e-i-s.e-d-u.' Thank you and have a great day!" 2"a attempt and beyond: "Hi, I'm calling from Brandeis University for the [HOUSEHOLD NAME] family. We are still trying to get in touch with them regarding our online research study. We'd be happy to discuss any questions or concerns you may have about our research. If you have any questions or if we've called this number by mistake, please call Sarah Harpaz at 781-736-2964 or e-mail us at 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 140 naplesgbrandeis.edu that's`n-a-p-l-e-s@-b-r-a-n-d-e-i-s.e-d-u' Thank you and have a great day!" Sending a new link upon request from respondent SPELL OUT E-MAIL BACK TO RESPONDENT. If they ask what the e-mail will be used for, say, "We will use your e-mail only for the purposes of this study. We won't add you to any mailing list or give your information to any other organization." The Web Survey If you reach the respondent and they agree to complete the survey with you over the phone, you will need to open the survey through the CATL The teal arrow points to the calling window that will pop up as soon as you click on "call" on the respondent's page. At the top right of the calling window is the Open Survey button (green arrow). SKIP THE INTRO PAGE OF THE RESPONDENT SURVEY —it is intended for respondents who complete the survey themselves online. Go through the survey question by question. An ideal interview should sound something like a conversation. Rather than forcing respondents to listen to every choice every time, we're going to use conversational tricks, like pauses, to attempt to elicit answers. If the pause doesn't elicit an answer, we gently prompt respondents by reading response categories. If a respondent stops you while you are reading the response categories, don't make him/her listen to them all. DO NOT ASSUME YOU KNOW WHAT A RESPONDENT WOULD ANSWER. If a respondent gives an answer that doesn't fit into a category, gently try to prompt them into one by first rereading the response categories ("Would that be `somewhat agree' or `strongly agree'?") and, if that fails, say that you understand that the categories do not quite fit, but which one would be the most appropriate. If that doesn't work, move onto the next question. If a respondent asks what a question means, simply say "whatever it means to you." For example, we ask, "In the past year, did you do anything to celebrate... [list of holidays]. If the respondent asks what "celebrate" means, say "Whatever you define as celebrate." If the respondent continues to press, just repeat, "Whatever you define as celebrate." If you run into technical difficulties (i.e., the survey will not load), ask the participant to wait a moment and inform your supervisor. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 141 L'J CAR R6pondent-ICitis - F - C L9 Tfisher-pc/catilocal/rat[CaIIRespondentcfm?idCommunication 1771&idAdminPanelMain-1655547 A UNe Lo9,, ® Horde Log in M DUCATI M CM Companion []' Testing CATI 04 CM Home r Old Lime J' N—Lime LS Eiahright Database ['] ® Peadora .rarn.. N ne Rea�nse Report ❑soda w5urvev Email Address Type ao o�sowsorvev rohertekland�corncastnet Respondent C Call Sack Report A mero Ter (-Choose Directive Reroonra Reoon rcnrry L. car -1— -i Call History 239-- Lbrary Admin. Nlhan Celiktas. Frday, 3 stvie olsoa-r umber fr brother, Robert. doe. 360-- Admin. Nlhan Celiktas. Friday, ]. phon PI" for rasp ce!!the g- 91N� Admin. Nlhan Celiktas. Frday, 1. Aceorint for home phone of the answ g machine in 2012. -Phone Numbers Phone Namher ®® 239■ 3fi0 ® 930 Contact Type: Save Cancel is Once you've completed the survey, make sure to click next on the last page of the survey so the page gets saved. CLOSE THE SURVEY WINDOW/TAB once you've finished. You don't need to close all open windows/tabse.g., you can keep the CATI open —but you do need to close the one that begins https://www.cLnjssurvey.com/. Getting Cut Off in the Middle of a Survey If a respondent gets cut off in the middle of a survey, e.g., if his/her cell phone has spotty coverage, call back. If he/she does not pick up, leave a voice -mail with Sarah's contact information. Mark the directive as `Call back later' and explain in the note what happened. If a respondent wants to stop the survey, say, "We only have a few more questions left." If they insist they're not going to continue, say "Would you like to come back to the survey at another time?" At the end of a call, click "Next" to ensure that the responses on the current page are saved, and then close the window/tab. If the respondent didn't want to complete it on the call, do not click through to the end for them. The survey software will remember previous survey answers if/when the respondent returns to the survey. Recording Information in the CATI While you're on the phone, you need to enter information into the CATI, recording what has happened during your phone call. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 142 Edl[ _ mry _ lmkz _Dols Help Vlery ni arM httpsficc,cmjs.orgicaklCaRespondenk.cFm?idCommpnicatiorFtl4]&idAdminPaneManF1896628 - ��-2 ogle 11 P Most Visited M Brandeis Hnlverslty M.. tau http:(lemiswebb.F.. PanelMaln=t]9923p urvet Login. IEl Tau Manage Respondent-[CM]SCompanl°-.,_I I Tau Call Responds.-[EM]SE°mpa F+] Sammau.l—l- Respondent Information surer u Slud Adni r � I Slarl Callipn calls° main testl I CATI N mo ——, Eoupa-n � u.aata survey status: cote Response Report —oem bvsrry A. Disno�5ury Email Addre s hecht@brandels,ed, communi` gwwri ob—d— edu create c,ti smmn,a choose Directive cmi cmlere ® — Call History —a Li rervLb rery ° 555-555-6777 1st attempt. Natanya- 761-736-3948 1st attempt. shahar F tad attempt. Natanya Phone Numbers PhD C i Round: Trip status', Rirth date'. Token: malntestl Contact Type', Respondent con t act Number I,'. Resp Cell Call Outcome', sent email New contact Info: Phone,, �Tvee', ema L O7 ej F_�� send Email To', ❑she ht&brande .,d, (1—p—d-1 ❑ gwwri[brandels. edu [Re:Ponaent) .y, e Email Options: Send a re9 ular email Outcome Notes Send avoi-oo ail email Send a customized email Save Cancel Contact Type (Navy Arrow): Choose whether you reached the Respondent- you've reached the respondent or a confirmed voice -mail of the respondent. Other- you've reached someone else besides the respondent (or the VM of someone else), Examples: (Spouse, roommate, coworker, other family member, or other person who knows the respondent) No Contact- you didn't reach anyone, the phone continuously rang, reached unidentified VM, you reached a completely wrong number, fax machine, etc. Number Is (Blue arrow): Choose what type of number it was that you called. Each contact type will have different number options. Respondent options: respondent Cell, respondent Work, respondent Home (Only select one if you know which type it is. If you do not know, then do not select one). Other options: other, spouse, parent, coworker, don't know (You MUST select one of these option before moving on). No Contact- you do not select a Number Type If you're not sure if you've reached a Respondent or an Other, then make an educated guess. Call Outcome and Outcome Comment (Green and Orange arrows): Choose an outcome that best summarizes what happened during the phone call. Explain why you chose that outcome and 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 143 what actually happened during the call in the outcome comment box. We want to know what the answering machine said, was the respondent nice, did they mention anything interesting (going on a trip, living with roommates, living with parents, being out of town for a while, etc.), anything else you can think of. The more information, the better! After you save a call outcome, the number you dialed will grey out to let you know that you saved a call outcome already. Each contact type will have different call outcome options. Respondent Call Outcome Options Hard Refusal- If you speak with the respondent and it is clear we should NOT call this number again. Examples of the comments that might go with a respondent hard refusal: • Respondent answered but hung up the phone in the middle of my introduction, I called again and respondent hung up again. Hard Refusal. • Respondent answered and asked to be removed from our e-mail and phone lists. Soft Refusal- If you speak with the respondent and he/she does not seem interested in taking the survey but also does not refuse to take the survey outright. After being reviewed by a supervisor, we re -assign these cases to our most experienced callers who try to get a different outcome. Example of a comment that might go with a respondent soft refusal: • Reached Steven. He said he was busy at work and hung up. Will Complete Online- You speak with the respondent and he/she says he/she will complete the survey online. If the respondent requests another survey link, send them a regular e-mail, which will include their survey link. Add a short personal message like, "It was great talking to you today." Example of a comment with Will Complete Online: • Reached respondent who was very friendly and said that she doesn't have time right now to do the survey but that she has the e-mail link already and will complete the survey later tonight. Left Message with Respondent- If you spoke to the respondent and he/she listened to what you had to say, but didn't request another survey link and didn't necessarily confirm that he/she would do the survey online. Example of a comment with a Left Message with Respondent call outcome: • Spoke to respondent, I explained why I was calling, she said she said that she remembered the survey but that she had to go, and then hung up before I could try to schedule a call back. Voice Message on Identified Machine- You leave a voice message on a machine that either you think identifies the respondent (has their first name) or that has previously been determined to belong to the respondent. Example of a comment with a Voice Message on Identified Machine: • Left VM encouraging respondent to do survey, machine says "Sally" in its recording. • Left VM on automated machine for Bobby. Mother had told us that this is the respondent cell number. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 144 Voice Message on ID Machine + e-mail- You leave a voice message on a machine that either you think identifies the respondent (has their first name) or that has previously been determined to belong to the respondent. When this call outcome is selected, you will have to go to the "send e-mail to" box (pink arrow) and select the e-mail addresses that you want your e-mail to be sent to. Select all e-mail addresses that say respondent in parenthesis. You should make sure to also look at the e-mail addresses with (Other) written after them because these may also be for respondents. Use your judgment. For example, if the e-mail address has the respondent's initials or name in it, then you can e-mail that one too. You will then we asked to select which type of e-mail you would like to send (purple arrow). Your options are: regular e-mail, voice -mail e-mail, or custom e-mail. Each e-mail type has a different text script (that you will not see), so make sure you select the proper type of e-mail. For a voice message on ID machine + e-mail outcome, select the Voicemail E-mail type. Call Back Later- Use this outcome if the respondent requested to be called back at a different time. As soon as you select `call back later,' a calendar will pop up so you can schedule the call (dark red arrow). You will have to select the day, time, and time zone of the call back. When selecting the time and time zone for the call back, please enter it in according to EST. The call back date and time will print automatically as part of your comment in the call history. So, in the comment box, you should write anything else that happened in the conversation. Try to get the respondent to pick a specific time for the call back, but if respondent won't, then just pick a time. Examples of comments with Call Back Later: • Spoke with respondent who said to call back tomorrow at noon, lives in California. • Spoke to respondent who was busy at the moment, but wanted to hear more about the survey at another time. She said to call back tomorrow. I asked for a specific time, but she said it doesn't matter. So I suggested 7:00 tomorrow (Tues) evening. She's in California, so that's 4:00 pm her time. She sounded interested and nice, but was just busy. If a respondent requests to be called back later on a different number than the one you are calling right now, then still select "Call Back Later" as your call outcome and schedule the call back on the calendar as usual and say which number the respondent wants to be called back on in your comment. If it is a NEW number that the respondent wants to be called back on, then enter the new number into the Got New Contact Info section (tan arrow). Make sure to select the number type if you know it. In your comment, make sure you say that the call back needs to be made to the new/other number and specify which number that is. Your comment might look like this: • Reached respondent. She was at work, so said to call 5454 number (her home number) tomorrow. Make call back on 5454 number. This call outcome also applies to situations that are more general. For example, if you hear in a VM that the respondent is out of the office until next week, then select a call back time for next week. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 145 EI. E�. YPre err Hu:ninle Iw6 tld� - (' .c W kart•J1rr.nrm.nNn+iC..q +.�fm'nYrnw IIaT> .wfnv-i».erra tiI ,$IaeA YsRef M &srJwui.a>rir M... f w k P'Ilnr9 .f r..da.r 17N, 1ravNpe. Ij 11. pM MnpprPagwd.� • [{Rxteprwan •� .M S41 k.R..d.*-Dc a Carpau..0 ..� - a.rade w&.j� HesNonennr [nfnrmaHnn +.r Lhr R.—J; Try ® 4iNl date' Token' mainCes[1 Fxr main testa cnilrnxn PolIL rwie • r upea�r Re oeuriele Renur [en(aCC YYC@' R..Irrixdr•rrl r P"", irr i 0.euu Su e.rv.y HIM-: Lon .. ..._._...._... lNiv rev 4 r..nix nenoit Nwnber ]a: R�sp[rll n tmefl Rddress ••1�++t�6ryiyrss.�pu ['.i Caul a+n.c [il161[k fa[ei •+ c"" ,iw,rr.8pbr�rWuo.urk+ [.� ••n.�.� Tvo.� 4r r+Ir S�rev Ciluuse Dlrt itirr New [ontac[]nfe: xi nn. Lai Had 9a1gMme: linix: Ti.. Ten.. ee,rr.narxeee FAr L*r— — Call HM.ry till Mo 11I WP Ill Fr Na Pigneorlona 555 555 6777 oLi=..NO- 1`r .[temPL Hatanra ]B1-]3G-39i6 11r.R.mRL ShdharY i .KempL iiatanra Phan. Nu -hers Ph. Other Call Outcome Options 1n n 1A 14 15 IA t] 19 iaVP C-anr PI Hard Refusal- You speak to a parent or spouse or roommate or whoever and they say that they don't want to be contacted again. Example comment: • Spoke with father who said "Stop calling me!" and hung up after I said I was calling from Brandeis University and asked to speak with the respondent. Or they hang up on you (and then you call back and they hang up again). Example comment: • Called and said "Hi can I speak with Lauren?" The person said, "This is her mother. Who's calling?" After I said that I was calling from Brandeis University about the study, the mother hung up. I called back right away and said "Hi. I think we got disconnected. Can I speak with Lauren?" The person hung up on me again. Or if he/she refuses for the respondent (this essentially means they don't want to be called again). For example, you may hear the Other asking the respondent and the respondent answering in the background. If this particular situation occurs, make sure you select Respondent Hard Refusal as your final directive. Example comment: • Spoke with brother who was conveying everything I was saying to his brother who was in the other room (but I could hear him in the background). Said respondent didn't want to participate and I heard him say so in the background. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 146 Soft Refusal: The "Other" that you speak with does not seem too interested in listening to you or passing along your message. After being reviewed by a supervisor, we re -assign these cases to our most experienced callers who try to get a different outcome. Example of a comment that might go with an Other soft refusal: • Spoke with roommate who said she didn't think the respondent would be interested. She hung up before I could try to get better contact information or ask her to pass along our information to the respondent. She didn't seem very interested in listening. Will Pass Message Along to Respondent: If you spoke to a person who would not give out the respondent's contact info but was willing to take a message and pass it along to the respondent. Example of a comment with Will Pass Message Along to Respondent: • Spoke with grandparent, he didn't want to give me respondent's info, so he agreed to take Dina's info and tell respondent. Left VM on Confirmed Other Answering Machine: You left a voice mail on an answering machine that is confirmed (either by name in machine message or by previously speaking to Other at this number) to be the Other. Example comment: • Left VM on machine with a message that said "You've reached the Cohen residence." Since the respondent's last name is Cohen, this is probably the respondent's parents/home phone number. I left a message saying who we're looking for, about the study, and Dina's information. Language Barrier: If you reached a person who you are unable to communicate with (because they don't speak English or speak English very poorly), then you should use this outcome. Make sure to leave a comment that includes what language the person speaks, if you can tell. Example of comment with this outcome: • Spoke with father who sounded Russian, could not communicate with him, have a Russian speaker call back. Call Back Later: You reached someone other than the respondent, who asked to be called back at another time. As soon as you select `call back later', a calendar will pop up so you can schedule the call. The call back date and time will print automatically as part of your comment in the call history. So, in the comment box, you should write anything else that happened in the conversation. Try to get the Other to pick a specific time for the call back, but if he/she won't, then just pick a time. Examples of comments with Call Back Later: • Spoke with sister who said she didn't have time to talk right now, but that she would be able to give us the resp's info if we call back tomorrow at noon, lives in California. • Spoke with a little kid who said his mom would be back later tonight. So, I'm going to mark this as a call back for 8:00 pm EST. • Reached someone (maybe dad) who didn't seem to speak English very well (maybe is Russian), but said his son would be back tomorrow to talk, I asked for a time and he said 7:30 pm EST. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 147 • Spoke to mother who gave the 5656 number for respondent. Mother said that the respondent is on vacation until next weekend, so I made a call back for then at the new number. Another time when you might use the Call Back Later call outcome is if you get a new number and you can't call it right away because of the time zone of that new number. If this happens, then you should select the Call Back Later outcome for the call and pick the call back date/time for the soonest date/time that new number can be called. For example, let's say you reach a mother who gives you the cell number for the respondent. The mother lives in California, so you called her at 9:00 PM EST. It is too late to call New York (where the respondent lives- the time zone of the new cell number). So, you should schedule the call back for the next day at 7:00 PM. When scheduling a call back, make sure you always ask what time zone the call back is for (just because it is a 617 number, you cannot assume that the call is in Boston). Sent E-mail: The person you reach either: • Gives you a new e-mail for the respondent. If this happens, you should make sure to enter the new e-mail into the text box under the other e-mail addresses listed. You should also select the regular e-mail type. In the additional message space, you should write a note saying who you got the e-mail from. You might write "Hi Ben, I spoke with your dad today who gave us this e-mail address for you. We hope that you'll complete this quick survey to help out with our important research study so we can learn about your life in the Collier County community. Thank you!„ • If the person you reach, or a voice -mail, verifies an existing e-mail for the respondent. The conversation might go like this: • You: "Hi. Can I speak with Ben?" • Other: "He doesn't live here anymore." • You: "Do you have a better phone number or e-mail address at which I might reach him?" • Other: "Who is this?" • You: "My name is [ ] and I'm calling from Brandeis University. We are trying to get in touch with Ben regarding a quick survey on Jews living in the Greater Naples area in Florida." • Other: "Oh, ok. Sure. His e-mail is bencohen(a?gmail.com" Another way the conversation might go when an Other verifies an existing e-mail we have for the respondent is: • You: "Hi, can I speak with Ben?" • Other: "He doesn't live here anymore." • You: "Do you have a better phone number or e-mail address at which I might reach him?" • Other: "Who is this?" 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 148 • You: "My name is [ ] and I'm calling from Brandeis University. We are trying to get in touch with Ben regarding a quick survey on Jews living in the Greater Naples area in Florida." • Other: "I don't think I'd like to give you his contact information." • You: "We have bencohengamail.com as an e-mail on file for him. Would you mind letting me know if that's correct?" • Other: "Yeah. I think it is." rile Edit pry ookmarks - 1, Help eCHSX {p] fEU h11-0.... ... .r9lcatlCallRespondenLcfm?IdcpmmwicaFion=114] dadm Pane1Ma 1846628 r p91e p �� L� Mos d " Brand— unwe ty M... lEU http.ljc s bb, P.-M.i 17-3d Lit t�,Ul ,o9 Li pondent-L-5 Companio...JE.11 ReWuMen[ mn ner Respondent Information s.navn �1 main testa A. a n Response Re ort Survey Status: Con C�II Back Report Email Add.. shecht@bra ndeis.e do gwwri�pbrantlei s.e d, Choose Directive tali cane sorry —' Call History sss-sss- 177 1st attempt. Natanya 781-736-3948 1`t attempt. Shahar F 2_ attempt Natanya Phone Numbers Ph. s.`�aR 5 a1 aiah., Round: Trip status: Birth date Token: m"'t—tl C o matt Type: other cp matt Number Is: 0 Call Outcome: Sent email New Contact Info, eR, a„1e. 0 T pe, sentl Email To: 0 shechtCbrandeis.edu (ae�po„de„t) I� gwwnCmbrantlei s.etlu [rxesvo„d eat) enter new Respondent Email Options: ar Pe t other w,] Outcome Notes Save Cancel , start tf)Ca11 Re—dene-[C... r(_• 13—d—u111e111ty M... / c 1111y—tcol-the .. M 15-2211m p-tcol... q a < 1:24 PM , We do not e-mail links to the survey to anyone other than the respondent. DO NOT send regular or voicemail a -mails to others than the respondent. If someone other than the respondent requests that you e-mail them the survey, select customized e-mail under e-mail options, and send them a message explaining the survey and providing our contact information. Say that you are not allowed to send the survey link to anyone other than the respondent, but that the respondent can contact us directly for the link. The conversation might go like this: • You: "Hi. Can I speak with Ben?" • Other: "He doesn't live here anymore." • You: "Do you have a better phone number or e-mail address at which I might reach him?" • Other: "Who is this?" • You: "My name is [ ] and I'm calling from Brandeis University. We are trying to get in touch with Ben regarding a quick survey on Jews living in the Greater Naples area in Florida." 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 149 • Other: "If you send it to me, I will forward it to Ben." • You: "We can't send the survey to anyone other than Ben, but I can send you an e-mail with the information Ben needs to know. We would really appreciate it if you could forward that along to him. What's your e-mail address?" Example: "Hi Mr. Cohen, Thank you so much for speaking with me today and for agreeing to forward our information to Ben. We are conducting a study of Jewish adults that live in the Greater Naples area for at least part of the year, on behalf of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. If Ben has any questions, or would like to schedule to take the survey over the phone, he can call Sarah Harpaz at 781-736- 2964 or e-mail us at naples e,brandeis.edu. We hope to hear from Ben soon because his responses are very important to us. Thank you! All the best, [your name]" Gave New Number: The person you reached gave you a new phone number for the respondent and none of the other call outcomes fit. Make sure you record the last four digits of the number is in your comments so that when viewing the call history later, we can see where that new number came from. Also, make sure you enter the new number into the "New Contact Info" section (tan arrow). Next to where you enter the new number is a drop down menu of phone types. Please select a phone type. They are all self-explanatory except for "Other." "Other" is for when you know who the phone number reaches, but that person is not one of the given options. An example would be if the number reaches the respondent's roommate (that would be a phone type of "Other"). Of course, make sure you call the new number rightawaX (if time zones permit you). Example comment: • Spoke to mother who didn't want to take a message, but did give me respondent's cell number (7462) and said she's living in Texas now. No/Unknown Contact Call Outcome Options Disconnected: You reached a message that said that the number that is disconnected. Once a number has had a call outcome of `Disconnected' 3 times in a row, write in the comments in capital letters "3 TIMES DISCONNECTED. DO NOT CALL." Rings Out: You reached a number that rings and rings with no answer or voice-mail/answering machine. Once a number has had a call outcome of `Rings out' 3 times in a row, write in the comments in capital letters "3 TIMES RANG OUT. DO NOT CALL." Wrong number: A number that reaches someone who does not know the respondent. If you see this call outcome in the call history, no need to call this number again, unless instructed otherwise. If you think there is a reason to try this number again, consult with the supervisor. Busy signal: You reached a number that has a busy signal. Once a number has had a call outcome of `Busy Signal' 3 times in a row, write in the comments in capital letters "3 TIMES BUSY. DO NOT CALL." Be aware that other countries sometimes have different rings. For 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 150 example, in Israel, it sounds more like a beep than a ring when you call, be sure not to confuse this with a busy signal. Automated Message with New Number: You reached an automated message that provides a new number. The automated message might say something like "The number you've reached is no longer in service. The new number is 555-888-3333." Make sure you enter the new number into the Got New Contact Info section and call the number. Also make sure you record the last four digits of the new number in your call outcome comment for the old number and make it clear that we shouldn't call the old number anymore, but should call the new number instead. Fax machine: You reached a fax machine; it makes loud high-pitched noises. If you see this call outcome in the call history, no need to call this number again, unless instructed otherwise. If you think there is a reason to try this number again, consult with the supervisor. Left Message at Automated VM: you reach an answering machine that is automated, meaning it is not a person's voice and you cannot tell who it reaches; you leave a more general message. If it's the first time you're calling, you might leave a voice -mail like this "Hi, my name is [ ], and I'm calling from Brandeis University. We are trying to reach [respondent] regarding a survey that we are conducting. We'd really appreciate it if they could call us back at 781-736-2964 e-mail us at naples@brandeis.edu. That's n-a-p-l-e-s@-b-r-a-n-d-e-i-s-.-a-d-u. Thank you!" VM full: You get a message saying something like `The voice mail box is full." Once a number has had this call outcome three times in a row, you should not call this number again and you should write "3 TIMES VM FULL. DO NOT CALL" in your comments. Not Accepting CallsNM Not set Up: You reached a message that says something like "The person you are trying to reach is not accepting calls at this time" or "The mail box of the person you are trying to reach is not set up at this time." Once a number has had this call outcome three times in a row, you should mark the case as a "Supervisor Review" and write "three times not taking calls" in your comments. Attempt Number After you finished entering all the information for a phone call, you will click Save. Once you click save, a new attempt number will print with the information you just recorded under the call history of the phone number you just called. Each time you call a phone number, it's a new attempt (at reaching the respondent). Again, this will print like this: 512-555-5555 1 st attempt. Natanya Cohen. Thurs, June 24, 2010. 7:40 pm. No contact. Rings Out. 2nd attempt. Shahar Hecht. Wed, July 7, 20101. 7:57 pm. Respondent Contact. Requested Call Back for July 8, 2010 at 5:00 pm EDT. Spoke with Jonathan and he's willing to do the survey. I scheduled a call back. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 151 Selecting a Directive (black arrow) After you have completed a case, meaning you have called every phone number that you should and followed through with all a -mails that you should, you MUST select a directive and enter a comment (black arrow). When you write your comment, you should always err on the side of writing too much information in a comment, rather than too little. Your comment is to leave a summary of what happened while you were trying to contact this respondent and why you selected the directive that you did. The directive is what you think should happen to this case next. After you've selected the directive and written the comment, click on the "End Attempt" button (sky blue arrow). Then you will be brought back to your calling list. The "start" button (next to the respondent for which you just left a directive) will have disappeared. If, for some reason you need to get back into that case, tell the supervisor. f, B—d—U.,,,MtW»3r-Y- Of Call Respondent-[CM1S C, E C rg 'l/cc.cmjs.org/catiCal!Respandent.cfm? dCommunication=1618&idAdmfnPanelMain-1654961 - ONet Login ® Horde Log in CW Old CAT] EN CMIS Companion F CMY5 Home ® 0fd Li— 0 S rffinght Database , r New Ll— 0 you are logged in as Dina eleckman N Dome Proiect Central Call Respondent > UTI > Call Respondent Samo® r Respandent Information Suryey Liat Study Admin Start® Cal[ Suce CAT[ Main SRI Marc survey FOFkiw-uP Update Resoanse Reoart Di —"Survey A- 0ispalSurvev Ca11 Back Report Round: Participant status, participant Birth date: OB-31-I978 Token: O133fiQ849M Gender: Male Gift amount: 25 55N: Gift status, Survey Status: None Email Address Type h—bil 2Uhptmah.com Respondent Coin municationa Comment: Create r 17I Call History cati S.— CA canary GeHinp Started SN[e Library olapoad'— 21 Ad Cohen. Wednesday, Jun 01, 2011. 12:44 PM. Administrative. Admin comment. reaches a recepcionsrt who wi11 direct you to rasp's VM, never reached rasp Lhoagh. 347- Admin. anya Cohen. Wednesday, Jun 01, 2011. 12:47 PM. Administrative. Admin comment. reached resp in 2009, but got no answer in 2010. 718 Admin. a an Cohen. Wednesday, Jun 01, 20I1. 12:42 PM. Administrative. Admin comment. reached resp's mother in 2009, she passed afong message, not Died m 2010. (lumbers Here are the directive options: Keep in Calling Rotation: Most of the directives that you leave will be "Keep in Calling Rotation." This directive simply means that the case doesn't need any special attention and should be called again later on if the respondent doesn't complete the survey online. Example comments: • Left VM on confirmed respondent cell (2376). 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 152 • Left VM on unknown number (6754), got a busy signal for "parent" number (2427). Supervisor Review: Use this directive if there is something dealing with this respondent and his/her CATI page that you would like a supervisor to review or change. Examples: a time zone is incorrect, you're not sure if the respondent is eligible or not for our study, something weird happened during your call, etc. You should write in the comments what it is you want to bring the supervisor's attention to. ***ANY CASE THAT HAS A "SOFT REFUSAL" CALL OUTCOME, NEEDS TO HAVE A SUPERVISOR REVIEW DIRECTIVE*** If you simply have a question, first ask the supervisor that is on duty. • Spoke with respondent who said that she lives in Australia now (so her 5555 number should have a different time zone). She said she is 14 hours ahead of us. • Spoke with resp. at 6754 number. He said he was busy and hung up, so it was a soft refusal. Note that when you are determining that someone has a new time zone, you need to ask how many hours difference (or just what time is it there now) or the name of the city. This is important because there are multiple time zones in one country (e.g., Australia has six different time zones). Respondent Hard Refusal: If you speak with the respondent and it is clear we should NOT call this number again, Sarah will remove them from the mailing lists so that they are not called again. Examples of the comments that might go with a respondent hard refusal: • Respondent answered at 4746 number but hung up the phone in the middle of my introduction, called again and respondent hung up again. Before speaking to respondent, I had spoken with mother who said respondent had a bad experience on Birthright. • Respondent answered at 5008 and asked to be removed from our e-mail and phone lists. Note that you do not use a respondent hard refusal directive if a parent or roommate gives you a refusal. We only stop calling a case overall if the respondent him/herself refuses. Call Back Later: Use this directive if the respondent requested to be called back at a different time (if any of the call outcomes you selected were "Call Back"). The call back time you had selected for the call outcome will automatically become part of your directive comment. The comment you write should be a quick summary of what happened, an explanation of the directive you selected, and anything noteworthy that happened during your phone calls. Examples of comments with "Call Back Later": • Respondent requested a call back for next week any day besides Thursday. I also spoke with mother who was nice and said that respondent had a good time on Birthright. • Spoke to respondent who was busy at the moment, but wanted to hear more about the survey another time. She said to call back tomorrow. She sounded interested and nice, but was just busy. She also said that she was now living in Germany. Daytime Phone Call: Use this directive if there is a phone number that should be tried during the workday (e.g., a respondent lives out of the country and would be asleep during our regular calling hours, or the only number reaches an office). Do NOT use this directive for specific callback times (e.g., a respondent asked to be called at 2:00 PM the following day). That 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 153 situation should have a "Call back later" directive. Only use the daytime call directive if one of the numbers we have is a number that can only be called during our day. Example of a comment with this directive: • 8109 number reaches an office VM ("You have reached the office of David Cohen..."), call back during office hours to reach David. This seems to be the only direct number, so let's try it during the day. Language barrier: If there is a phone number that needs to be tried, but the person it reaches is someone that you are unable to communicate (because of a language barrier) with, then you should use this directive. Make sure to leave a comment that includes what language the person speaks, if you can tell. Example of comment with this directive: • Spoke with father at 0649 number, could not communicate with him because he only speaks Russian. Have a Russian speaker call back. Other number reached an automated VM. No good phone numbers: Use this directive if ALL phone numbers are unhelpful (they're wrong, disconnected, reach a parent who isn't helpful, etc). Example of a comment with this directive: • Mobile number 8745 is disconnected; home number 5665 is a fax machine, no good phone numbers left. • 6784 reaches the mother who hung up on me twice, 3156 has rang out 3 times in a row, no good numbers left. Worksheet: Examples of Leaving Directives in the CATI 1. 415-555-5555 V attempt. Viktoria Bedo. June 18, 2015. 715. Other Contact. 4655- reached resp father- said she wasn't home and to call back later in the evening, I said we couldn't call later on Sundays, and asked if she would be available in the evenings on the weekday and he said later evenings. I looked up the 905 area code and it is eastern time Call Outcome: 512-555-5555 I' attempt. Viktoria Bedo. Thu Aug 11,2015 7:20. Other Contact. Spoke to mother, said she would relay the message but that her daughter (the resp) had told her about the survey and she also confirmed the email on file so i am re -sending it. resp's mother told me the resp. had said she was going to complete it Sent to: abckabc.com Call Outcome: 2. 415-555-5555 I' attempt. Viktoria Bedo. Thu Aug 04,2011 9:19. Other Contact. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 154 I spoke to a woman, possibly the mother, she said the resp was not home, so I asked when was a better time to call back and she didn't know, wasn't sure about confirming email addresses but she took down our number to pass along to the resp to call us back. Call Outcome: 415-555-5555 I' attempt. Viktoria Bedo. Thu Aug 04,2011 9:19. Respondent contact. reached respondent on his cell phone. Seamed unsure about wanting to do the survey, but after some prompting said that he would check it out online. Call Outcome: 3. 512-555-5555 1st attempt. Viktoria Bedo Thu Sep 01,2011 7:44. Respondent contact. Talked to the resp at 2057. He said that he has received our emails. He asked me how much is the gift card for, and when I said 15 he said "Meeeh. I don't have the time for that. I am going to pass, but thanks" Call Outcome: Directive: 4. 405-555-5555 4th attempt. Viktoria Bedo. Wed Sep 07,2011 8:21. Respondent Contact. Spoke with resp. at 3255 number. He said he completed the survey and sent it in. I apologized for calling again and explained that our information said he had only completed half of it. But he says he completed the whole thing. Call Outcome: Directive: 3rd attempt. Viktoria Bedo. Wed Aug 31,2011 8:38. Respondent Contact. reached resp at HOME at 3255. He said that the hotmail account was no good, and provided the walla.co.il account. Sent email Call Outcome: Directive: 5. 613-555-5555. 2nd attempt. Dina Bleckmab. Mon Sep 05,2011 8:26. Respondent contact. (5196) Spoke with resp. He said he will complete the survey if he has the time but that he cannot make any promises. He seemed very upset that we keep calling him. I told him that the survey will be closing at the end of this week and that I hope he participates. He then said thank you and that he had to go and then hung up Call Outcome: 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 155 6. 905-555-5555. I' attempt. Viktoria Bedo Tue Aug 02,2011 7:31. Other Contact. Woman speaking on VM greeting "Hi, we're not available to take your call, but leave your number and we'll get back to you. Left message. Call Outcome: 902-555-5555. 11 attempt. Viktoria Bedo Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:37. No contact/unknown contact. A woman picked up and said I had a wrong number. Call Outcome: Directive: 905-555-5555. V attempt. Viktoria Bedo. Tue 02,2011 7:46. Respondent contact the greeting said " I have reached the [redacted] family" I left a message for our resp, saying that "this message was for Daniel and that we need to contact him regarding a survey " Didn't send an email to the address on file because the email is for another person "Jonathan", it's probably the father. Call Outcome: Directive: 7. 905-555-5555. 3rd attempt. Viktoria Bedo. Thu Aug. 20,2011 8:30. Other Contact. I talked to the respondent's father who gave me a new email address (abc@gmail.com) to reach the respondent, who is currently living in Israel. Sent to: abc@gmail.com Call Outcome: Directive: When Things Go Wrong People may be upset that we're calling them, upset that their name is on a list, or during the survey they may become upset by certain questions about sensitive topics. Be sympathetic. If they had a bad experience in their community, let them know that this survey is the perfect place for them to make their feelings known. If they are upset with the Jewish community, a particular community leader, or don't consider themselves "Jewish enough" — tell them that we want to hear from everybody, and that if they're willing to share their experiences, we would appreciate hearing about them. If a respondent won't do the survey, thank them very much for their time and hang up. If someone asks to speak with the supervisor, that's OK. Tell them "One moment please" and find the supervisor. People may be abusive. If this happens, simply say "Thank you very much for your time" and 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 156 hang up. You don't need to wait for a pause in the tirade. Use the "Hard refusal" disposition in the CATI and leave a comment explaining the situation. Then go tell the supervisor this happened. If you need to take a break after a bad call, that's OK. You can also send an email to Sarah or Breanna if you want to talk about it with them. If the Respondent is Screened Out (Ineligible for the Survey) If the respondent answers "no" to the first question, make sure that they are certain of this answer. If they are, tell them "Sorry to bother you, unfortunately you are not eligible for our survey. Thank you for your time." They are ineligible for the survey. Mark "no" and then click "Next" before you close their survey. If the respondent answers "Yes" but then answers "No" to both the question asking whether they are Jewish, and the question asking whether someone in the household is Jewish, again: make sure this information is correct. Once they are screened out this cannot be undone. If they're certain no one in the household is eligible, tell them the same thing: "Sorry to bother you, unfortunately you are not eligible for our survey. Thank you for your time." Mark their answers. If they don't tell you their ZIP code, put 99999 so we know it's not an eligible participant, then click "Next" before you close their survey. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 157 Pre -Notification Letter February 3, 2017 The [LastName] household [Addressl] [Address2] [City], [State] [Zip] Dear [LastName] household, Your household is invited to participate in a survey of the Greater Naples Jewish community. The survey is intended to help local Jewish organizations assess the needs and interests of Jews throughout the region. It is being conducted on behalf of the Jewish Federation of Collier County by the Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies at Brandeis University. Over the next several weeks, you may receive a phone call from Brandeis University about the study. If you receive a call, please answer! This survey is very important and we need to hear from people just like you. The survey is completely voluntary; however, its usefulness is dependent on honest answers and participation from members of the community. You will not be asked to donate money and your information will remain confidential. The survey will take about 25-30 minutes to complete. You must be at least 18 years old to participate. To complete the survey online, visit the following link and enter your access code: http: //bit.ly/NJCstudy Access Code: [TOKEN] If you have any questions about the survey or would like to have the survey link emailed to you or schedule a time to complete the survey over the phone, please call the research team at Brandeis at 781-736-2964 or email us at naplesnbrandeis.edu. To be in touch in with the Jewish Federation of Collier County, contact Jeffrey Feld at 239-263-4205 or by email at JFeldgj ewishnaples.org. For background information about how the Cohen Center conducts community studies, please visit our website, http://bit.ly/cmjsstudy. You may also contact the Brandeis Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (781-736-8133, irb(kbrandeis.edu). This committee works to safeguard the interests of individuals who participate in Brandeis - sponsored research. Results from the study will be available at the end of the year. We would like to thank you in advance for your participation in this important research. Sincerely, Matthew Boxer, PhD Assistant Research Professor, Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 158 Briefing Materials for Interviewers Brandeis University 4 T nnx Maurice and Marilyn Cohen Center Mailstop 014 for Modern Jewish Studies 415 South Street Waltham, Massachusetts Leonard Saxe, Ph. D., 02454-9110 Director TEL: 781-736-2060 FAX: 781-736-3929 Briefing Materials for 2017 Greater Naples Community Study The contents of this file will help callers and supervisors for the 2017 Greater Naples Jewish Community Study better understand the questions on the survey and respondents' answers. If you have any questions that are not addressed by the material in this file, please contact the Cohen Center for clarification. Matthew Boxer, Principal Investigator Tel: (781) 736-3968 Email: mboxer&brandeis.edu Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies Brandeis University, MS 014 415 South Street Waltham, MA 02454-9110 Web: www.brandeis.edu/cmjs nap leskbrandeis.edu Janet Aronson, Project Manager Tel: (781) 736-2348 Email: jaronsongbrandeis.edu 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 159 Jewish Holidays Cheat Sheet Chanukah/Hanukkah (Ha-noo-ka or Kha-noo-ka): Festival of Lights, usually celebrated in December. (Traditions: Lighting a menorah; eating jelly donuts and latkes; playing with dreidels.) High Holidays: Also sometimes referred to as the "High Holy Days." Refers to Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur (both defined below). Lag Ba'Omer (Lahg bah-oh-mair): 33rd day of a seven -week period beginning on the second day of Passover and ending the day before Shavuot (both of which are defined below). Traditionally marks the end date of a plague that killed all but five of 24,000 students of a leading rabbi of the first and second centuries CE. Referred to as Lag La'Omer by Sephardic Jews. (Traditions: bonfires, carnivals, haircuts, weddings.) Passover (In Hebrew: Pay-sakh): Celebrating the Israelites' exodus from Egypt in Biblical times. (Traditions: Holding/attending seders [say-dair — ritual meals and Exodus story retellings]; eating matzah.) Observed in the spring. Purim (Poo -rim or Poo-reem): Celebrating the foiling of a plot to kill the Jews of Persia. (Traditions: dressing in costumes; throwing parties; reading the Book of Esther.) Observed in the early spring. Rosh Hashanah (Rosh Ha-sha-na — many possible pronunciations): The Jewish New Year, celebrated in the early fall. (Traditions: Blowing the shofar [ram's horn]; eating apples and honey.) Shavuot (Sha-voo-oat or Shuh-voo-iss): Festival of Weeks, celebrating the Israelites receiving of the Torah at Mt. Sinai. (Traditions: Eating cheesecake; staying up all night to learn Jewish texts.) Observed in the late spring/early summer. Simchat Torah (Sim-khaht Toe -rah or Sim-khas Toe -rah): Often thought of as the last day of Sukkot; ending/beginning of Torah reading cycle. (Traditions: Dancing with Torah scrolls; large- scale celebration.) Sukkot (Soo-kote or Suhk-iss): Festival of Booths, celebrated in the fall. Commemorates dwellings of Israelites during 40 years of wandering in the desert. (Traditions: Building/eating in huts or booths.) Tisha B'Av (Ti-shah bi-Ahv or Ti-shah bi'Ahv): Day of mourning commemorating the destruction of the First and Second Temples in Jerusalem. Tu B'Shevat (Too Bee-shvaht): Holiday of trees, celebrated sometime in mid -winter. (Traditions: Planting trees; eating nuts, dates, figs.) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 160 Yom Ha'Atzmaut (Yome Ha-atz-ma-oot): Israel Independence Day, celebrated in the spring. (Traditions: Israel parades; Israel-themed parties.) Yom Ha'Shoah (Yome Ha-sho-ah): Holocaust Remembrance Day, in memory of the 6 million Jews murdered during the Holocaust. Observed in the spring (April/May). Yom Kippur (Yome Key -poor or Yome Kipper): Day of Atonement, celebrated in fall. (Traditions: 25 hours of fasting and prayer.) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 161 Hebrew/Yiddish Words Cheat Sheet Ashkenazi (Ahsh-ke-nah-zee): Refers to Jews of Eastern and Central European descent. (See also Mizrahi and Sephardi.) Bar Mitzvah or Bat/Bas Mitzvah (Bar Mitts-vah; BotBahs Mitts-vah): Age at which a Jewish child is regarded as an adult under Jewish religious law. Boys have a Bar Mitzvah (literally "son of the commandments"), traditionally at age 13; girls have a Bat Mitzvah (literally "daughter of the commandments"), traditionally at age 12. Does not require a ceremony or celebration to mark the event, but in contemporary practice often has one. Bima (Bee-mah): Generally a raised platform or stage in a synagogue from which prayers are led and the Torah is read. Brit Milah/Bris (Breet Mee-lahBris): A Jewish circumcision that occurs when the baby boy is 8 days old. Chabad (Kha-bod): A Jewish movement that is particularly active near college campuses. Known for outreach to non -religious Jews. Sometimes known as Lubavitch after the village of its origin in Western Russia. Challah (Kha-lah or kha-lah): Braided loaf of bread traditionally eaten during Shabbat and holiday meals. Chametz (khuh-mitz or kha-metz): Leavened foods that Jews are traditionally forbidden to consume or even own during Passover. Charoset (kha-row-set): A traditional food eaten during Passover, traditionally made of either apples, walnuts, spices, and wine (in Ashkenazic families) or dates, apricots, raisins, almonds or pistachios, and wine (in Sephardic families). Chasidic/Hasidic (Kha-sid-ick): Refers to any of a variety of forms of Orthodox Judaism that promotes spirituality through the internalization of Jewish mysticism. Chabad is the most widely recognized form of Chasidism today. Chavurah/Havurah (Kha-voo-rah): A lay -organized Jewish prayer community. A havurah may not have an official building or rabbi, but will meet regularly for prayer. Haggadah (huh-guh-duh): A book read during the seder (see below) to tell the story of Passover. Kaddish (Kah-dish): Jewish prayer for the dead Kehilla (Keh-hee-lah): Hebrew word for congregation or community Kiddush (Kee-doosh or kih-dish): Jewish prayer over wine recited at the beginning of Shabbat and holidays, as well as at some special events (e.g., weddings) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 162 Ma'ariv (Mah-ah-reev): Evening prayers. Matzah (mots-uh or mots-ah): Unleavened bread. Traditionally eaten throughout Passover, though many Jews also eat it during the year. Mezuzah (Meh-zoo-zah or meh-zoo-zah): An encased scroll of parchment put on the doorway of a Jewish home. Mincha (Min-khah): Afternoon prayers. Minyan (Meen-yahn or like minion): A Jewish prayer quorum needed to conduct services. Mizrahi (Miz-rah-khee): Refers to Jews of Middle Eastern descent. (See also Ashkenazi and Sephardi.) Seder (seh-deter or say -der): Ritual meal on the first night (and, outside of Israel, traditionally also on the second night) of Passover, during which the story of Passover is told. Sephardi (Seh-far-dee): Refers to Jews of Spanish descent. (See also Ashkenazi and Mizrahi.) Shabbat (Shah-bot): Sabbath. Begins Friday night at sundown and ends Saturday night at sundown. Traditionally a day of rest. Many respondents may use the Yiddish pronunciation, Shah-biss. Shaharit (Shah-hah-reet): Morning prayers. Shaliach (Shah-lee-akh): Hebrew word for emissary, refers to an Israeli sent to live among a local Jewish community as a representative of Israel. Shivah (Shi-vah): A seven-day period of mourning observed by the loved one's family. Friends and neighbors will bring over food and comfort the family during the week. Shtetl (Shteh-tull): Typically refers to a small town with a large Jewish population in Eastern or Central Europe in the 19th and 20th centuries before World War II. In popular usage, may refer to a neighborhood with a disproportionate Jewish population. (Classic example: Fiddler on the Roof.) Shul (Shool): Refers to a Jewish congregation, usually a synagogue. Siddur (See-duer or sih-derr): A Jewish prayer book. Tallit (Tah-leet or tah-liss): A Jewish prayer shawl, traditionally worn by men during certain prayers. In recent years, some women have begun wearing them too. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 163 Talmud (Tall -mood): Central text of rabbinic Judaism, over 6,000 pages in length, containing teachings and opinions of thousands of rabbis on a wide variety of topics. Tikkun olam (Tee-koon oh-lahm): Literally, repairing the world. Refers to shared sense of ethical responsibility to build a model society in which everyone is treated fairly and everyone's needs are met. Torah (Toe -rah or toe -rah): Foundational text of Judaism; occasionally referred to in English as the Pentateuch or the Five Books of Moses. Tzedakah (Tseh-duh-kuh or ts-dah-kah): Literally means justice or righteousness, but most commonly used to refer to charity. More generally, the religious obligation to conduct oneself according to norms of justice and propriety. Yahrzeit (Yar-tzite): Anniversary of the death of a close relative (parent, sibling, spouse, or child). Literally means "time of year." Often marked by lighting a special candle that burns all day and recitation of Kaddish in memory of the deceased. Yeshiva (Yeh-shee-vah): An intensive academy of Jewish learning, typically deeply religious in orientation, that focuses primarily on traditional religious texts such as the Torah and Talmud. Plural form is yeshivot (yeh-shee-vote). 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 164 Branches of Judaism There is one section of the survey where respondents will be asked to identify themselves or members of their household with a "branch" of Judaism. Branches are denominational movements; membership in one movement or another typically suggests a certain level of religiosity, though there is also wide variation within movements. The main movements are referred to as: - Orthodox - Conservative - Reconstructionist - Reform Of these, adherents to Orthodox Judaism tend to be most religiously conservative, while Reconstructionist and Reform Jews tend to be more progressive. (Note that Conservative Judaism should not be confused with political conservatism; many Conservative Jews are politically liberal.) In addition to these movements, there are several other common responses given by respondents on Jewish surveys when asked about affiliation with a branch of Judaism: - Humanistic: a nontheistic movement that defines Judaism in terms of culture and history - Renewal: difficult to describe, but has origins in countercultural movements late 1960s and 1970s - Secular/culturally Jewish: These respondents may prefer to identify as secular or cultural Jews rather than identifying with one of the main movements, which have more religious connotations. - Just Jewish: Many respondents prefer not to identify with any given denomination or movement, saying instead that they are "just Jewish." Respondents may decide that none of these options fit them and provide a different response. For these respondents, type their response in the text box next to "Other." Common "other" entries for this question include post -denominational, traditional, modern Orthodox, Chabad, and Conservadox (i.e., a combination of Conservative and Orthodox). 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 165 General Jewish Communal Phrases and Organizations AIPAC (Ay -pack): The American Israel Public Affairs Committee. A lobbying group that advocates pro -Israel policies to the US government. Antisemitism: Prejudice, hatred of, or discrimination against Jews, individually or as a group, based on their Jewish national, ethnic, religious, or racial identity. BDS: "Boycott, Divest, Sanction" — a movement dedicated toward applying economic pressure against the State of Israel to end its occupation of the West Bank and improve conditions for Palestinians. Prominent only in last several years. Often perceived as antisemitic. Day school: Similar to Catholic school, a full -day program attended by Jewish children instead of public school in which students learn both secular subjects (e.g., English, math, science, social studies, etc.) and Jewish subjects (e.g., Hebrew, Jewish history, theology, etc.). There is no Jewish day school in Greater Naples, but some families may send their children to board at yeshivot in other places. Hadassah (Huh-dah-suh): The Women's Zionist Organization of America. Volunteer organization that promotes ties to Israel. Best known as a leading supporter of medical research. Hillel (Hill -el): Shorthand for Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life. Largest Jewish college campus -based organization in the world, serving over 550 colleges and universities throughout the world but primarily in North America. Hebrew school: Supplementary Jewish educational program attended by children between one and four times a week, generally after school or on weekends, in order to teach them about Jewish religious life, culture, and history. Sometimes referred to as "supplementary school," "Sunday school," or "religious school." J Street: An advocacy group that describes itself as left-wing, pro -Israel, and in favour of a peaceful settlement of the Israeli -Palestinian conflict. Its collegiate arm is known as J Street U. Jewish National Fund: JNF. A charitable Zionist organization that primarily manages significant land holdings and large infrastructure projects in Israel. Jewish War Veterans: An organization of Jewish veterans who served in the US armed forces during times of war. The local post in Naples is Post 202. ORT (pronounced as a word, rhymes with "sort"): A global Jewish charity that primarily funds educational programs, vocational training, and social development for Jews and non -Jews around the world. PJ Library: Organization that mails Jewish children's books and music each month to families across the country. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 166 Taglit-Birthright Israel (Tahg-leet): A program that provides a free ten-day educational tour of Israel for qualified, self -identified Jewish young adults between the ages of 18 and 26. Largest Jewish educational program in the world; over 350,000 participants since 1999. Three pillars of Judaism: A reference, generally from more religious Jews, to a section of the Talmud that says the world rests on three things: Torah study, ritual observance, and acts of kindness. Zionism: National political movement of the Jewish people in support of a Jewish national homeland in the Land of Israel. Zionist Organization of America: ZOA. A prominent American pro -Israel advocacy group and primary representative of American Jews to the World Zionist Organization. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 167 Naples Jewish Community Organizations Cheat Sheet B'nai B'rith (Ben- ay Brith): Literally "Children of the Covenant," the oldest Jewish service organization in the world. Core commitments are security and continuity of the Jewish people and the State of Israel and combating antisemitism and other forms of bigotry. B'nai B'rith Youth Organization (BBYO) is the local Jewish youth group for high school students in Naples, sometimes also referred to as AZA or BBG. Children in middle school have an affiliated group known as the Middle School Program. Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida: JCRC: Jewish Community Relations Council. A division of the Jewish Federation of Collier County that promotes and enhances the relationship between the organized Jewish community and the broader community in Greater Naples and advocates for issues of Jewish communal interest. Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida: Also known as JFCS. A private, non-profit social service organization serving members of both the Jewish community and the wider community in the Greater Naples area. Jewish Federation of Collier County: Also known as the Federation. The central organizational body in the Jewish community. They manage the funding of many of the Jewish organizations in the area and are the funder of this study. MCA: Men's Cultural Alliance. An affinity group of men in the Greater Naples Jewish community that organizes a wide variety of social, intellectual, and cultural activities. Part of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. WCA: Women's Cultural Alliance. An affinity group of women in the Greater Naples Jewish community that organizes a wide variety of social, intellectual, and cultural activities. Part of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 168 List of Naples Area Jewish Congregations Please note that this may not be an exhaustive list but rather the list of congregations we expect respondents are most likely to identify as congregations of which they are members in the Greater Naples area. Each congregation is identified by the denomination with which it is affiliated, but each is also open to individuals and households of other denominations. Beth Tikvah (Tick-vuh) — Conservative denomination Chabad Naples Jewish Community Center — Orthodox, but reaches out to all denominations and levels of observance Humanistic Jewish Chavurah — Humanistic Jewish Congregation of Marco Island — Reform Naples Jewish Congregation — Reform Temple Shalom — Reform 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 169 Additional Resources The links on this page are provided for anyone who wishes to learn more about this study or related research. 1) A Portrait of Jewish Americans: Findings from a Pew Research Center Survey of U.S. Jews (2013), http://www.pewforum.org/files/2013/10/jwish-american-full-report-for- web.ndf The most recent large scale, nationally representative study of the US Jewish population; several Cohen Center researchers advised the Pew Research Center on the methodology and instrument. 2) The 2015 Greater Nashville Jewish Community Study (2016), http://www.brandeis.edu/ssri/pdfs/NashvilleCommStudy2Ol5.pdf A recent Jewish community study conducted by the Cohen Center. Illustrates the kind of analysis we will do with the data collected for this study. 3) Judaism 101, http://www.jewfaq.org/index.shtml An online encyclopedia of Judaism, primarily from an Orthodox viewpoint. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 170 Appendix D: Maps 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 171 Dot Density Map of Jewish Households in the Greater Naples Area I 33917,,, I 33993 33909 33905 33972 �, 33971 33935 33991 x dnmo ep Rd 33974 N 33504' Lee i 22914 ■ 33912 33913 �T bpi �, 339�8 �� ■ ■ `�+,q '`� ' �.•� ■ 3392E 2412 ~ ■ ■ ■ 34120 34142 ■ 11 �. ■ 3 4 7 r � FT5 2 5 . Staff HwV 93 41'g4 34117 ,Pll Collier 11 0 5 10 20 Miles 5 Palm Bea6h Hendry 33440 75 34141 1s Hwy 41 T. r-�iTAE 00097 Monroe 5 iJ ativna I Pare Ser vix Legend I — Jewish Federation of Collier County, Humanistic Jewish Chavurah 2 — Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida 3 — Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 — Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 — Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 6 — Jewish Congregation of Marco Island 7 — Naples Jewish Congregation 8 — Temple Shalom • = 20 households 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 172 Dot Density Map of Length of Jewish Households' Residence in the Greater Naples Area 3399 Ar i� � 33991 ¢P 339 3391= S q& 0 5 10 33905 33972 33971 I -`�`ee Rd 33974 Lee 12 33913 20 Miles 47 N 33+28 • ■ 3 34i120 � F75 dA 5[ace e NwY 5�� HwY 99 5ta[ f 34117 • Collier ti • 34114 �8� y 99 Palm Beach Hendry 334d0 H75 34141 1s Hwy 41 Trf-rrti Try F do697 Monroe Nab —I Par& Service Legend 1— Jewish Federation of Collier County, Humanistic Jewish Chavurah 2 — Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida 3 — Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 — Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 — Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 6 — Jewish Congregation of Marco Island 7 — Naples Jewish Congregation 8 — Temple Shalom • = 20 households living in the Greater Naples area 10 years or more • = 20 households living in the Greater Naples area fewer than 10 years 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 173 Dot Density Map of Length of Seasonal and Year -Round Residents in the Greater Naples Area 33917 33172 33909 33993 33905 33971 33935.. Palm Beach V� 33991 �m Of, Ok�ep Rd 339 T4 N� J • 33914 339O'. Lee Y Hendry 33ddO y 33912 33913 � r 0 33928 ■ 3413 24120 34142 ■ 34110 ■ ■ 24119 HTs 1 n Everglades�'Y 3 di 7 $ � FT5 d4 SL�e 2 I-tv+Y g3 9[ale 5 : 53a■ 3411 T 341 04 . 34112 Calker 411 3 34141 34114 fS Hwy 41 Ta inn T+t E U 6 2 e ' 0 5 10 20 Miles i OOO97 Monroe s� s netb�ei Faux st.��� Legend 1— Jewish Federation of Collier County, Humanistic Jewish Chavurah 2 — Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida 3 — Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 — Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 — Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 6 — Jewish Congregation of Marco Island 7 — Naples Jewish Congregation 8 — Temple Shalom • = 20 seasonal households, primary residence • = 20 seasonal households, secondary residence = 20 year-round households 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 174 Dot Density Map of Households With and Without Children in the Greater Naples Area F � 33993 33909 33905 22972 22971 �9 339 91 h".kep Rd {: 33974 3390, } Lee " 3391^ 33912 33913 �T 1 g@ �.�' 339�8 �� ■ ■ r .. n 33128 ■ ■ ■' i ■ �sd135 34120 r■ �11 4 � � 3'd.11 ■ 0 5 10 20 Miles ILI I I I I I I I I 33935 KU199 ■ F75 9�� Hv+Y 93 9[a[ y 1 3411 7 Collier ■ Palm Beach Hendry 33440 1w 34141 H75 1s Hwy 41 T 1-"TO E 00097 Monroe S 14.tL--I P9rx Service Legend I — Jewish Federation of Collier County, Humanistic Jewish Chavurah 2 — Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida 3 — Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 — Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 — Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 6 — Jewish Congregation of Marco Island 7 — Naples Jewish Congregation 8 — Temple Shalom • = 20 households without children • = 20 households with children 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 175 Dot Density Map of Members of Collier County Congregations in the Greater Naples Area 33917 { 33909 33905 33972 33993 � �' 33971 33935 Palm Beach 33991 _ ■mO'�a'ep Rd � J 33974 N� • 33904"' Lee kF! Hendry 3391= 33440 33912 33913 �T ti g� {ro• 339�3 $� r 33928 M ■ ■ +49■ ■■ 34120 34142 ■ 341y3J ■ 11 ■ T5 1 ■ ti=ye�9lades�'Y n 7 a FT5 Slate KwY BA L23 +Y 93 3411 7 Collier 34141 ■ 34114� Ff .. ao ■ 0 5 10 20 Miles I I I I I I I I us};yy41 Tam-!_"TfE 00097 Monroe N ati—.I Park Service Legend I — Jewish Federation of Collier County, Humanistic Jewish Chavurah 2 — Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida 3 — Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 — Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 — Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 6 — Jewish Congregation of Marco Island 7 — Naples Jewish Congregation 8 — Temple Shalom • = 20 households, not members of Collier County congregations • = 20 households, members of Collier County congregations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 176 Dot Density Map of MCA/WCA Member Households in the Greater Naples Area r 33917 33972 33909 33993 33905 .T� 33971 33935 Palm Beach 33991�mOk ee Rd 33974 3390, 33914 Lee " Y Hendry 334411 y 33912 T �� 33913 ± {roJ 339 8 ■ �,q 33928 ■ ■ ■ �341 3 ■ ► ■ ■ ■ 24120 34142 rs■ �3 11 ay1 HTS � 3 4 7 mate He+Y B4 ■ F'1v+Y g3 Stara 2 5 : 5O■ 3 1'04 34112 ■■ 34117 � Ciier �113 34141 ■ ■ 34114 1S Hwy 41 T f-i T11F U 6 ■ 2 a . i 0 5 10 20 Miles 00097 Monroe Sc 5 Nati°nal Para Eer vice Legend I — Jewish Federation of Collier County, Humanistic Jewish Chavurah 2 — Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida 3 — Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 — Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 — Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 6 — Jewish Congregation of Marco Island 7 — Naples Jewish Congregation 8 — Temple Shalom • = 20 households, not members of MCA/WCA • = 20 households, members of MCA/WCA 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 177 Dot Density Map of Highly Involved Respondents in the Greater Naples Area 33993 32909 0 5 10 33905 33972 33971 h".karep Rd 33974 Lee 3912 33913 PT 7 33928 ■ ■■ 341 ■ �■ 34,120 ■ 341 34119 db . ■ 20 Miles 2 1 j3■ 33935 Palm Beach Hendry 32440 341 42 �,e ades�'Y F-15 NY g4 SOW 3411 7 Collier I 34141 ■ 4-1■14 �,-, Hw41 Ta3rll�rrti Td E 00097 Monroe N sti—I Psr& Service Legend I — Jewish Federation of Collier County, Humanistic Jewish Chavurah 2 — Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida 3 — Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 — Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 — Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 6 — Jewish Congregation of Marco Island 7 — Naples Jewish Congregation 8 — Temple Shalom • = 20 households, moderate, low, or no involvement levels • = 20 households, high involvement level 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 178 Dot Density Map of Uninvolved Respondents in the Greater Naples Area 33917 - 33909 33993 33905 33972 33971 6 33991 x h,roo 33974 • 3390d L e e 3391= 33912 33913 ' �a. 339 �� ■ 1� ■ 33928 ■ y ■r L's'd135 ■ 34120 ■ Ir ■ ■ 0 5 10 20 Miles I�i�IIiII 33935 Palm Beach Hendry 33440 34142 H75 Everglal 34141 US Hwy 41 T. rYd M TTq E oon97 Monroe 5 wsti—I Par& Service Legend I — Jewish Federation of Collier County, Humanistic Jewish Chavurah 2 — Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida 3 — Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 — Beth Tikvah of Naples 5 — Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center 6 — Jewish Congregation of Marco Island 7 — Naples Jewish Congregation 8 — Temple Shalom • = 20 households, high, moderate, or low involvement levels • = 20 households, no formal involvement level 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 1 Appendix E: Comparison Charts 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 180 Explanation of Comparison Chart The following series of tables provides detailed data about community characteristics for reference. In each section, key characteristics are reported for the overall population on the top row, as well as for subgroups of the population, with each appearing in a row below. All rows are identical throughout the document. Each column reports on one of the variables of interest, showing the proportion of adult Jews or Jewish households (depending upon the question) who fall into the category indicated. In some cases, a complementary column is elided for the sake of saving space (i.e., males are shown, but not females). Where areas of the document are solid black, the question was not applicable for the particular subgroup indicated by the row header. Where areas are colored light gray and numbers appear, there is a statistically significant difference between the subgroups. Selected subgroups are defined as follows: Overall: all Jewish adults or all Jewish households Involvement: See the following page for detailed description of the Involvement categories. Marriage Status: For respondent -level variables, Unmarried are respondents who are not living with a spouse, fiance/e, or significant other. Inmarried are Jewish respondents living with a Jewish spouse, fiance/e, or significant other. Intermarried are Jewish respondents living with a non-Jewish spouse, fiance/e, or significant other. For household -level variables, Unmarried are households with no coupled individual. Inmarried are households containing two Jews in a romantic relationship. Intermarried are households containing a Jew and non -Jew in a romantic relationship. Residence Status: Year-round are households who do not have a second home. Seasonal, Primary are households who also have at least one residence aside from their Naples -area home, and who say that the Naples -area home is their primary residence. Seasonal, Secondary have at least one residence aside from their Naples -area home, but who say that the Naples -area home is not their primary residence. Length of Residence: Jewish respondents who have lived in the area for fewer than 10 years and those who have lived in the area for 10 or more years. Synagogue Membership: Synagogue member households belong to a Jewish congregation, either in Greater Naples or elsewhere. Non-members do not. MCA/WCA Membership: Member households contain an individual who belongs either to the Men's Cultural Alliance or the Women's Cultural Alliance of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 181 Involvement variable The involvement variable divides Jewish households into four categories based on their level of involvement in the local Jewish community across three key dimensions: organizational membership, organizational participation, and prosocial behavior. Membership: Respondents were asked if they were members of the six Collier County synagogues or any other synagogue in the area; if they were members of other organizations in Greater Naples; if they were members of informal Jewish groups based in Greater Naples; and if they belonged to the Men's Cultural Alliance or Women's Cultural Alliance. Each membership type was scored as 0 (non-members) or 1 (members), and then added together. Scores of 0 were coded as "no" organizational involvement, scores of 1 were coded as "low" organizational involvement, scores of 2 were coded as "moderate" organizational involvement, and scores of 3 and 4 were coded as "high" organizational involvement. 2. Participation: Respondents were asked how frequently they engaged in a variety of activities connected to local Jewish organizations and programs: participating in programs, reading materials, or paying dues. For participation in programs and reading materials, respondents were asked to indicate if they did each activity less than monthly or at least monthly, if at all. Responses of never were coded as 0, less than monthly were coded as 1, and at least monthly were coded as 2. Dues paying was coded as 2. All scores from participation types were added together. Overall scores of 0 were coded as no participation, 1 and 2 were coded as "low" participation, 3 and 4 coded as "moderate" participation, and 5 and 6 coded as "high" participation. 3. Prosocial Behavior: Respondents were asked if they had volunteered for or through local Jewish organizations, and if they made any charitable donations (other than membership dues) to local Jewish organizations in the past year. For the two types of volunteering, the respondent's higher frequency of participation was used. Responses of never were coded as 0, less than monthly were coded as 1, and at least monthly were coded as 2. Donations to local Jewish organizations were coded as 1. All scores from volunteering or donating were added together. Scores of 0 were coded as no prosocial involvement, scores of 1 were coded as "low" prosocial involvement, scores of 2 were coded as "moderate" prosocial involvement, and scores of 3 were coded as "high" prosocial involvement. An index was constructed from these three forms of involvement in the Jewish community. For each form of involvement, respondents who scored "low" were given one point, those who scored "moderate" were given two points, and those who scored "high" were given three points —and those who did not score in a dimension were given zero points. When scores across each form of involvement were added up, respondents could have scores between zero and nine points. Respondents with an index score of 0 were coded as having no formal involvement in the local organized Jewish community; scores of 1, 2, and 3 were coded as having low involvement; scores of 4, 5, and 6 were coded as having moderate involvement; and scores of 7, 8, and 9 were coded as high involvement. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 182 Explanation of Comparison Chart The following series of tables provides detailed data about community characteristics for reference. In each section, key characteristics are reported for the overall population on the top row, as well as for subgroups of the population, with each appearing in a row below. All rows are identical throughout the document. Each column reports on one of the variables of interest, showing the proportion of adult Jews or Jewish households (depending upon the question) who fall into the category indicated. In some cases, a complementary column is elided for the sake of saving space (i.e., males are shown, but not females). Where areas of the document are solid black, the question was not applicable for the particular subgroup indicated by the row header. Where areas are colored light gray and numbers appear, there is a statistically significant difference between the subgroups. Selected subgroups are defined as follows: Overall: all Jewish adults or all Jewish households Involvement: See the following page for detailed description of the Involvement categories. Marriage Status: For respondent -level variables, Unmarried are respondents who are not living with a spouse, fiance/e, or significant other. Inmarried are Jewish respondents living with a Jewish spouse, fiance/e, or significant other. Intermarried are Jewish respondents living with a non-Jewish spouse, fiance/e, or significant other. For household -level variables, Unmarried are households with no coupled individual. Inmarried are households containing two Jews in a romantic relationship. Intermarried are households containing a Jew and non -Jew in a romantic relationship. Residence Status: Year-round are households who do not have a second home. Seasonal, Primary are households who also have at least one residence aside from their Naples -area home, and who say that the Naples -area home is their primary residence. Seasonal, Secondary have at least one residence aside from their Naples -area home, but who say that the Naples -area home is not their primary residence. Length of Residence: Jewish respondents who have lived in the area for fewer than 10 years and those who have lived in the area for 10 or more years. Synagogue Membership: Synagogue member households belong to a Jewish congregation, either in Greater Naples or elsewhere. Non-members do not. MCA/WCA Membership: Member households contain an individual who belongs either to the Men's Cultural Alliance or the Women's Cultural Alliance of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 183 Involvement variable The involvement variable divides Jewish households into four categories based on their level of involvement in the local Jewish community across three key dimensions: organizational membership, organizational participation, and prosocial behavior. 1. Membership: Respondents were asked if they were members of the six Collier County synagogues or any other synagogue in the area; if they were members of other organizations in Greater Naples; if they were members of informal Jewish groups based in Greater Naples; and if they belonged to the Men's Cultural Alliance or Women's Cultural Alliance. Each membership type was scored as 0 (non-members) or 1 (members), and then added together. Scores of 0 were coded as "no" organizational involvement, scores of 1 were coded as "low" organizational involvement, scores of 2 were coded as "moderate" organizational involvement, and scores of 3 and 4 were coded as "high" organizational involvement. 2. Participation: Respondents were asked how frequently they engaged in a variety of activities connected to local Jewish organizations and programs: participating in programs, reading materials, or paying dues. For participation in programs and reading materials, respondents were asked to indicate if they did each activity less than monthly or at least monthly, if at all. Responses of never were coded as 0, less than monthly were coded as 1, and at least monthly were coded as 2. Dues paying was coded as 2. All scores from participation types were added together. Overall scores of 0 were coded as no participation, 1 and 2 were coded as "low" participation, 3 and 4 coded as "moderate" participation, and 5 and 6 coded as "high" participation. 3. Prosocial Behavior: Respondents were asked if they had volunteered for or through local Jewish organizations, and if they made any charitable donations (other than membership dues) to local Jewish organizations in the past year. For the two types of volunteering, the respondent's higher frequency of participation was used. Responses of never were coded as 0, less than monthly were coded as 1, and at least monthly were coded as 2. Donations to local Jewish organizations were coded as 1. All scores from volunteering or donating were added together. Scores of 0 were coded as no prosocial involvement, scores of 1 were coded as "low" prosocial involvement, scores of 2 were coded as "moderate" prosocial involvement, and scores of 3 were coded as "high" prosocial involvement. An index was constructed from these three forms of involvement in the Jewish community. For each form of involvement, respondents who scored "low" were given one point, those who scored "moderate" were given two points, and those who scored "high" were given three points —and those who did not score in a dimension were given zero points. When scores across each form of involvement were added up, respondents could have scores between zero and nine points. Respondents with an index score of 0 were coded as having no formal involvement in the local organized Jewish community; scores of 1, 2, and 3 were coded as having low involvement; scores of 4, 5, and 6 were coded as having moderate involvement; and scores of 7, 8, and 9 were coded as high involvement. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 184 \ 4, � O O 5 (3) N O (Asn ON O > 4' C o O a Demographics i v L -� ; V � z L c� G i } } v >_ v N ; N L 4% N > _0 Ln �o � °° Ln O C O C o o t O N O U N v oo U a v o Overall 52% 21% 41% 31% 8% 3% 24% 50% 22% 88% 5% 87% No Involvement 66% 22% 42% 21% 15% 2% 24% 34% 41% 80% 9% 66% Low Involvement 49% 22% 41% 31% 6% 5% 25% 46% 24% 86% 2% 96% Mod. Involvement 48% 24% 40% 31% 5% 4% 23% 59% 14% 90% 5% 88% High Involvement 47% 11% 44% 39% 6% 4% 25% 57% 14% 96% 3% 95% Unmarried 50% 17% 26% 30% 28% 5% 23% 36% 36% 83% 2% 95% Inmarried 51% 20% 43% 34% 3% 4% 27% 54% 15% 90% 6% 87% Intermarried 64% 33% 55% 10% 2% 0% 9% 46% 44% 83% 0% 100% Year -Round 54% 26% 38% 25% 11% 4% 21% 49% 26% 84% 7% 81% Seasonal, Primary 51% 16% 47% 34% 4% 1% 25% 51% 22% 92% 4% 91% Seasonal, Secondary 47% 11% 41% 44% 4% 7% 38% 47% 7% 93% 0% 99% In Naples < 10 Years 47% 27% 49% 23% 1% 4% 30% 46% 19% 91% 4% 92% In Naples 10+Years 55% 17% 37% 35% 12% 3% 21% 51% 24% 86% 6% 84% Synagogue Member 47% 20% 37% 38% 5% 5% 28% 60% 6% 91% 5% 91% Synagogue Non -Member 56% 21% 45% 24% 10% 2% 21% 41% 36% 85% 5% 83% MCA/WCA Member 45% 11% 49% 36% 3% 5% 23% 59% 14% 94% 2% 97% MCA/WCA Non -Member 55% 28% 33% 27% 12% 3% 25% 48% 24% 82% 8% 77% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 185 Respondent o v t 3 +, = Q �o �o a) C:L ;.2 m m� Jewish � U_0 `� " O CO a `� °' N N v Ln � u a--' 7 -6 U > U > Education Q � w °'ai v a = m� m� Q Overall 16% 78% 37% 47% 88% 55% 4% No Involvement 27% 76% 32% 24% 86% 69% 1% Low Involvement 9% 72% 31% 38% 84% 48% 3% Mod. Involvement 14% 85% 39% 59% 90% 54% 6% High Involvement 11% 79% 49% 73% 92% 50% 9% Unmarried 25% 65% 23% 33% 80% 40% 4% Inmarried 12% 84% 42% 57% 90% 59% 6% Intermarried 12% 82% 41% 33% 93% 69% 1% Year -Round 21% 72% 36% 36% 84% 56% 3% Seasonal, Primary 10% 88% 35% 57% 92% 58% 4% Seasonal, Secondary 9% 82% 48% 61% 94% 46% 11% In Naples < 10 Years 11% 84% 33% 51% 91% 52% 4% In Naples 10+ Years 18% 75% 39% 43% 86% 57% 5% Synagogue Member 11% 85% 43% 65% 92% 55% 9% Synagogue Non -Member 19% 73% 33% 33% 85% 57% 1% MCA/WCA Member 11% 84% 40% 61% 89% 48% 9% MCA/WCA Non -Member 20% 73% 39% 39% 86% 58% 2% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 186 Residence Overall No Involvement Low Involvement Mod. Involvement High Involvement Unmarried Inmarried Intermarried Year -Round Seasonal, Primary Seasonal, Secondary In Naples < 10 Years In Naples 10+Years Synagogue Member Synagogue Non -Member MCA/WCA Member MCA/WCA Non -Member Q C - n3 aJ v D v a) cn v (6 a1 a, N W a) Z C C _ E E E E _ a Zo o v a) U O 0 a C 2 2 4, 2 2 i C 2 S Z p Z d (0 L (6 U C W vC 4. N (o i a) O O N OIn N O O� O O O a1 a1 O a m w} tab } N N N N N aj N fu Q Ln N N m 13.17 85% 94% 57% 30% 14% 12% 48% 28% 4% 2% 34% 2% 5% 35% 11.51 86% 97% 72% 25% 3% 58% 27% 6% 0% 0% 64% 4% 1% 19% 14.47 85% 93% 60% 19% 21% 4% 48% 39% < 1% 1% 31% 3% 2% 36% 12.72 84% 94% 45% 40% 16% 4% 51% 29% 8% 3% 27% 2% 7% 42% 14.19 86% 91% 53% 35% 12% 4% 60% 31% 2% 1% 29% 0% 10% 44% 18.48 87% 93% 78% 12% 10% 11% 44% 28% 5% 6% 17% 10% 8% 23% 12.22 83% 93% 50% 34% 17% 2% 56% 32% 4% 1% 35% 1% 4% 45% 12.42 88% 97% 44% 48% 8% 42% 28% 16% 1% 0% 41% 1% 4% 23% 14.3 87% 94% 8% 22% 11.57 80% 9 9 % 111111W1 46% 25% 4% 2% 35% 2% 1% 52% 11.93 85% 84% 52% 37% 2% 1% 32% 2% 0% 55% 91% 45% 37% 18% 17% 47% 27% 4% 2% 49% 1% 3% 38% ■79% 87% 95% 63% 26% 11% 8% 49% 30% 4% 2% 21% 3% 6% 34% 13.27 82% 92% 39% 40% 21% 3% 49% 39% 5% 1% 31% 1% 7% 45% 12.93 86% 95% 70% 22% 8% 25% 47% 14% 3% 3% 39% 4% 3% 28% 11.58 79% 93% 35% 43% 22% 1% 52% 36% 5% 3% 23% 0% 5% 52% 14.4 88% 94% 72% 18% 10% 12% 47% 26% 3% 1% 32% 6% 5% 23% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 187 c o Household °' L O V) O v L o co n _ '� 41 O � O Characteristics EC _ _73 Eb Overall 53% 16% 31% 1% 2% 15% 85% No Involvement 36% 16% 49% 1% 1% 9% 95% Low Involvement 42% 31% 27% 1% 2% 16% 79% Mod. Involvement 69% 8% 23% 1% 2% 16% 82% High Involvement 72% 5% 23% 0% 2% 20% 88% Unmarried 2% 3% 6% 88% Inmarried < 1% 1% 17% 82% Intermarried 1% 3% 11% 92% Year -Round 49% 12% 39% < 1% 2% 18% 97% Seasonal, Primary 63% 26% 11% 1% 1% 11% 96% Seasonal, Secondary 68% 10% 21% 2% 2% 17% 9% In Naples < 10 Years 51% 13% 35% 1% 1% 15% 79% In Naples 10+ Years 63% 22% 15% 1% 2% 16% 88% Synagogue Member 72% 9% 19% 1% 1% 18% 78% Synagogue Non -Member 43% 22% 34% < 1% 2% 13% 91% MCA/WCA Member 71% 10% 19% < 1% 2% 13% 79% MCA/WCA Non -Member 46% 18% 35% 1% 2% 16% 87% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 188 U O a1 z 7 C a1 O Z O Z +, Ln U L C O Z O Z O in V N V) � n r a) E Synagogues ° 0 _O N 3 ' L n L -0 v .. a1 O E m i - aj v L = + � � v O and ° o woo o " o E :°° E E °C o -0 Eo v Ln v o Ln c >. Ritual Life (1/2) 0 _ 0 c v °' 2 �° aEi cEo L z -°a 2- - m N m p J D O � p Z 0 p > a� Q ) 44 Q 4- O Q to L.L _ = Z z z z z Q Overall 26% 23% 40% 73% 47% 45% 16% 40% 10% 29% 53% 18% 51% 43% No Involvement 0% 6% 58% 77% 24% 21% 16% 32% -- 80% 18% 3% 17% 15% Low Involvement 14% 22% 42% 67% 55% 54% 8% 39% 19% 25% 66% 9% 42% 43% Mod. Involvement 41% 34% 30% 68% 63% 62% 17% 50% 16% 11% 68% 21% 70% 55% High Involvement 60% 28% 30% 84% 75% 46% 47% 60% 7% 1% 50% 49% 74% 58% Unmarried 20% 12% 40% 63% 44% 15% 9% 31% 15% 43% 43% 14% 39% 24% Inmarried 34% 32% 44% 76% 53% 63% 17% 46% 9% 16% 61% 23% 65% 55% Intermarried 15% 12% 25% 85% 41% 53% 27% 44% 4% 46% 47% 7% 23% 37% Year -Round 26% 4% 53% 66% 42% 43% 12% 38% 11% 38% 44% 18% 42% 40% Seasonal, Primary 33% 39% 23% 85% 58% 43% 31% 61% 6% 19% 64% 17% 56% 40% Seasonal, Secondary 14% 66% 26% 99% 70% 69% 16% 7% 13% 10% 70% 20% 75% 64% In Naples < 10 Years 24% 28% 20% 78% 68% 66% 18% 65% 13% 16% 65% 19% 58% 50% In Naples 10+Years 28% 20% 44% 70% 43% 38% 15% 29% 10% 36% 47% 17% 46% 39% Synagogue Member 66% 55% 1% 60% 40% 88% 59% Synagogue Non -Member 48% 49% 2% 24% 32% MCA/WCA Member 31% 38% 36% 75% 66% 60% 28% 46% 14% 9% 69% 22% 67% 53% MCA/WCA Non -Member 26% 15% 43% 68% 40% 40% 13% 35% 10% 37% 47% 16% 43% 39% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 189 L Vl L L Qj Synagogues and z Q L v v Ritual Life (2/2) 4 � °' U =� =� v 4-1 O J U J U 4.1 Q O U_ Overall 59% 8% 81% 77% 21% No Involvement 85% 2% 56% 48% 9% Low Involvement 59% 9% 77% 71% 15% Mod. Involvement 50% 8% 93% 91% 29% High Involvement 41% 17% 94% 98% 36% Unmarried 73% 5% 55% 49% 14% Inmarried 48% 12% 95% 94% 29% Intermarried 72% 1% 77% 69% 7% Year -Round 62% 8% 71% 71% 19% Seasonal, Primary 66% 5% 90% 86% 21% Seasonal, Secondary 35% 15% 97% 89% 33% In Naples < 10 Years In Naples 10+ Years Synagogue Member Synagogue Non -Member MCA/WCA Member MCA/WCA Non -Member 56% 7% 95% 89% 25% 61% 9% 73% 71% 19% 39% 14% 94% 93% 35 % 73% 4% 71% 66% 12% 53% 7% 95% 91% 27% 61% 11% 72% 70% 19% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 190 — M v ro � o � Perspectives on L o 5 v N_ Q L+ .E = :W Being Jewish N ;� § _ �w� �� C 73 v-a L W v: v v2 C N ai O L O L OL L L n r'1 E 2 E 2 L +� L (n �' VI (n c LQ C: ' v T+> en L v �> wo v v +� > ao E E v v a) c U v `�' Lq v= v c Q> \1/2� V � U N (J N M CO g a! +' m N CO 4! m o u p U +� p u +1 O cn U D Q a Overall 12% 45% 42% 73% 57% 46% 42% 89% 76% 76% No Involvement 42% 45% 13% 77% 53% 14% 25% 91% 81% 90% Low Involvement 11% 53% 36% 62% 51% 49% 29% 88% 69% 69% Mod. Involvement 1% 51% 48% 76% 61% 54% 51% 88% 76% 71% High Involvement 1% 24% 76% 83% 65% 60% 66% 91% 83% 76% Unmarried 22% 56% 22% 59% 51% 27% 29% 91% 71% 80% Inmarried 8% 34% 58% 82% 61% 55% 50% 90% 81% 77% Intermarried 11% 66% 22% 67% 54% 45% 36% 82% 67% 65% Year -Round 19% 50% 31% 72% 56% 42% 31% 90% 79% 80% Seasonal, Primary 6% 42% 52% 76% 56% 52% 54% 90% 77% 73% Seasonal, Secondary 0% 35% 65% 75% 66% 48% 59% 85% 67% 66% In Naples < 10 Years 6% 48% 47% 74% 60% 48% 53% 87% 79% 73% In Naples 10+Years 16% 44% 40% 74% 56% 45% 36% 91% 76% 78% Synagogue Member 4% 39% 58% 78% 58% 66% 60% 87% 76% 71% Synagogue Non -Member 19% 50% 31% 70% 57% 30% 28% 90% 76% 79% MCA/WCA Member 1% 33% 66% 77% 59% 50% 55% 88% 77% 72% MCA/WCA Non -Member 20% 51% 29% 68% 53% 46% 32% 89% 73% 76% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 191 Eo V) o v Perspectives on v .3 > a)�> v a)> E J Being Jewish U E 7 v�� a-' U ��__ 41 t �- U ��__ N ate' t +' U �0__ — t U •L = �o� L C i O 7 O N 7 2 0= 7 i ��/�� v Q v i U V1 -� L U VI Q (0 U V1 i= E O a� L i U O N U a1 z U N +�- U fa - J L.L L.L. L.L O Overall 45% 47% 25% 33% 26% No Involvement 81% 25% < 1% 7% 6% Low Involvement 40% 47% 11% 35% 25% Mod. Involvement 36% 53% 29% 37% 29% High Involvement 31% 62% 72% 36% 43% Unmarried 56% 43% 20% 30% 17% Inmarried 40% 56% 30% 44% 33% Intermarried 45% 28% 14% 2% 15% Year -Round 52% 46% 27% 30% Seasonal, Primary 37% 41% 22% 24% 14% Seasonal, Secondary 37% 69% 17% 52% 34% In Naples < 10 Years 44% 45% 17% 24% 27% In Naples 10+Years 46% 49% 28% 40% 25% Synagogue Member 32% 57% 40% 44% 41% Synagogue Non -Member 55% 41% 14% 17% 15% MCA/WCA Member 37% 49% 37% 34% 27% MCA/WCA Non -Member 47% 49% 18% 39% 26% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 192 U C O VI _Q1 > � t Q Q 0 0 >Q) 0 + a-+ U0 _ ca 0 Q) 4-1 M (0-0 v -0 6_ -0 M ` ai +.i p (a N p Q) Q) N L Q) co to v t 0 Q) 0 L Q) Qo Ln Q) z.. Q3)sraeI v a>) z 0 L 0 L a) z z za fu0 o> QJ C Q) N Q Q L Q) N •� + b,p 2 44, OA cLii to VLi u (B CO Q) Q) CD Q) Q) N co CD a) iO L.L f6 L.L LL L.L 7 0 7 0 7 0 Q) L V1 m m tL/f Ln N Ln Li Overall 38% 27% 32% 3% 14% 3% 19% 28% 16% 31% 21% 59% 20% 49% No Involvement 55% 23% 20% 3% -- -- 3% 25% < 1% 21% 48% 46% 6% 43% Low Involvement 45% 26% 27% 3% 45% 0% 18% 21% 6% 25% 17% 63% 21% 44% Mod. Involvement 26% 29% 39% 6% 10% 11% 24% 29% 15% 23% 15% 63% 22% 54% High Involvement 29% 31% 40% 1% 3% 0% 29% 40% 7% 22% 8% 61% 31% 57% Unmarried 48% 14% 36% 2% 7% -- 8% 29% 7% 30% 44% 44% 12% 40% Inmarried 27% 34% 34% 5% 8% 0% 23% 30% 10% 24% 10% 65% 25% 59% Intermarried 56% 26% 16% 2% 44% 27% 21% 16% 4% 9% 20% 66% 16% 33% Year -Round 42% 25% 29% 4% 16% 0% 11% 35% 7% 25% 28% 54% 18% 50% Seasonal, Primary 36% 27% 33% 4% -- -- 29% 17% 9% 18% 16% 62% 22% 44% Seasonal, Secondary 27% 35% 38% -- -- -- 29% 22% 7% 26% 9% 71% 20% 59% In Naples < 10 Years 35% 32% 28% 5% 9% 7% 22% 24% 18% 32% 11% 69% 20% 50% In Naples 10+Years 40% 25% 33% 3% 21% 0% 17% 30% 16% 31% 27% 54% 20% 49% Synagogue Member 22% 31% 44% 4% 15% 9% 32% 29% 20% 35% 13% 59% 27% 59% Synagogue Non -Member 50% 25% 22% 3% 13% 0% 9% 27% 13% 28% 27% 59% 14% 43% MCA/WCA Member 23% 36% 39% 3% -- -- 32% 24% 44% 20% 12% 74% 14% 50% MCA/WCA Non -Member 45% 22% 29% 4% 16% 4% 11% 32% 56% 15% 28% 48% 24% 51% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 193 QJ C Q1 QJ C U 4-1 — C C �O C L - L E Q) Organizations v;> In _ W W 4 c a) ru (1�6) �v �� vv m� v m vU m v�° m �, v��° m � v" v Z O L XO L 2� = O O 2 z ` = O L 2 Qj L = O 2 O = 2 _ L N O � CA 0 O -_j _ _ = * O *= O a v0f Overall 28% 26% 31% 15% 38% 24% 28% 38% 32% 34% 59% No Involvement 0% 19% 0% 55% Low Involvement 13% 1% 15% 30% 17% 15% 37% Mod. Involvement 60% 20% 28% 48% 38% 34% 67% High Involvement 74% 27% 10% 33% 78% 66% 81% Unmarried 43% 23% 23% 11% 25% 11% 7% 39% 24% 28% 48% Inmarried 19% 21% 40% 20% 48% 14% 22% 47% 43% 40% 69% Intermarried 28% 52% 15% 4% 25% 9% 12% 1% 9% 10% 37% Year -Round 30% 30% 25% 15% 23% 11% 9% 22% 58% Seasonal, Primary 20% 18% 43% 19% 59% 17% 22% 30% 46% 36% 59% Seasonal, Secondary 5% 44% 37% 14% 57% 7% 34% 54% 47% 29% 57% In Naples < 10 Years 22% 29% 37% 12% 51% 23% 28% 51% 38% 35% 58% In Naples 10+Years 24% 28% 30% 18% 32% 25% 24% 30% 29% 33% 58% Synagogue Member 3% 21% 50% 26% 50% 31% 49% 49% 43% 32% 71% Synagogue Non -Member 37% 34% 21% 9% 29% 19% 12% 19% 24% 36% 39% MCA/WCA Member = 10% 56% 34% 20% 20% 41% 55% 48% 63% MCA/WCA Non -Member 27% 43% 23% 7%7% E 14% 36% 19% 14% 56% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 194 � L c 4 v c 'u c V NO � V �O N z NO °NO QN NO W w Oco Organizations U EO/4 a- a)- U O aa E av E ° ai o w aL a V) a-1 a• V) O o i•(c E oE CI_ E >' U M O U tLwc O O cO v Oo O O Ln cn cn a a a Overall 72% 74% 74% 44% 34% 49% 57% 31% No Involvement 79% 90% 93% M 2% 20% 2% Low Involvement 51% 52% 56% 14% 28% 37% 39% 26% Mod. Involvement 80% 77% 78% 69% 45% 55% 80% 53% High Involvement 85% 95% 86% 91% 55% 59% 96% 24% Unmarried 80% 75% 81% 34% 21% 33% 43% 26% Inmarried 73% 77% 74% 53% 43% 59% 67% 35% Intermarried 54% 58% 66% 33% 25% 21% 51% 26% Year -Round 72% 73% 77% 33% 22% 42% 29% Seasonal, Primary 73% 73% 74% 64% 45% 44% 76% 35% Seasonal, Secondary 67% 79% 68% 52% 61% 57% 84% 33% In Naples < 10 Years 67% 79% 71% 49% 44% 60% 68% 38% In Naples 10+ Years 76% 71% 76% 42% 29% 41% 52% 27% Synagogue Member 78% 80% 80% 58% 51% 56% 75% 40% Synagogue Non -Member 67% 69% 69% 34% 21% 36% 44% 24% MCA/WCA Member 78% 85% 74% 78% 53% 56% 90% 38% MCA/WCA Non -Member 67% 66% 75% 24% 23% 39% 37% 27% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 195 O ca Organizations N> v4- c v > 0+ ' >a� O w N c _"j O c c � o+ � I = of � 4"� Q a E 4-1 N CC v C L C N C L) NO f W C O o h U" 0 A N_ O OA M 0 bn 0ro bn U W(3/6) O a) C + co b�0 a O O a O D O M a O D U a O O a O _0 ru O s C a Of Overall 28% 40% 24% 32% 32% 26% No Involvement -- -- 0% 2% Low Involvement 13% 34% 16% 34% 15% 34% Mod. Involvement 31% 45% 31% 50% 39% 35% High Involvement 76% 45% 22% 23% 77% 19% Unmarried 23% 28% 32% 27% 27% 26% Inmarried 30% 49% 23% 36% 35% 27% Intermarried 30% 10% 22% 27% 30% 25% Year -Round 23% 29% 23% 25% Seasonal, Primary 39% 41% 38% 36% 44% 25% Seasonal, Secondary 28% 19% 33% 39% 44% 32% In Naples < 10 Years 32% 47% 35% 40% 38% 23% In Naples 10+ Years 26% 30% 19% 28% 29% 27% Synagogue Member 36% 46% 31% 43% 43% 32% Synagogue Non -Member 22% 28% 11% 24% 23% 21% MCA/WCA Member 50% 44% 23% 36% 53% 32% MCA/WCA Non -Member 15% 35% 24% 30% 19% 22% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 196 c— o 6 c o — v 6 c o — 6 c o a) v 6 c o a, 76 c o>, v Organizations N J •� N O� N '� � N Q i O N Q i N O (6 (0 N (O • • N C (6 .. N (6 M E N C (6 l6 E •N •, 'L N 0 4-�g O v o v �g o 0 O H O tw� oru (6 O 4 , bA 2 O 4, L 5 O l6 U O l6 U L O o0 O v v v v Qj ai Overall 43% 25% 45% 24% 49% 21% No Involvement 19% 6% 18% 3% 21% Low Involvement 33% 30% 35% 31% 27% 29% Mod. Involvement 54% 29% 57% 20% 61% 23% High Involvement 79% 13% 75% 22% 59% 4% Unmarried 32% 19% 40% 28% 38% 20% Inmarried 48% 30% 48% 24% 59% 23% Intermarried 43% 19% 43% 19% 14% 17% Year -Round 32% 24% 45% 24% Seasonal, Primary 63% 29% 42% 21% 47% 18% Seasonal, Secondary 46% 22% 49% 29% 52% 16% In Naples < 10 Years 48% 22% 53% 25% 51% 14% In Naples 10+Years 40% 26% 41% 23% 47% 24% Synagogue Member 58% 25% 59% 27% 61% 18% Synagogue Non -Member 31% 25% 34% 18% 28% 23% MCA/WCA Member 59% 23% 58% 20% 58% 15% MCA/WCA Non -Member 33% 26% 36% 28% 35% 25% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 197 76 Q> QJ 2 +- QJ -0 C CU -C J -0 • O -0 U a' CL -a U C -0 U C C N O -0 U 4-1Q) N � .. JJ QJ (U J J Q) N L NQ1 "Organizations Q .iO Q!� Q) O QJ 'L Q C-N i (n Q QN E N (UQJ �N •E 1 QJ bA QJ _C QJ O U by C ibA i' iN O U _++ i (5/6) M bz O 4.1 Z LO 0 b0 ;= O OQz 0 Q 0 Q 0 Q to 0bLQ QO 0 O O > c- > C- O > 0) t O > Q C Gi > Q > > 0 > Q cn Q cn to 0 to Q Overall 60% 16% 5% 17% 23% 21% 9% 21% 28% No Involvement 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Low Involvement 51% 0% 2% 10% 4% 2% 6% 12% 9% Mod. Involvement 76% 10% 6% 23% 24% 19% 10% 28% 33% High Involvement 96% 75% 12% 17% 79% 77% 24% 22% 79% Unmarried 45% 10% 3% 5% 12% 15% 3% 8% 18% Inmarried 68% 22% 8% 23% 33% 25% 13% 27% 38% Intermarried 60% 8% 1% 2% 8% 14% 3% 7% 15% Year -Round 50% 16% 2% 16% 21% 5% 21% Seasonal, Primary 73% 14% 11% 5% 16% 24% 12% 19% 39% Seasonal, Secondary 77% 8% 7% 12% 19% 16% 18% 24% 36% In Naples < 10 Years 73% 15% 8% 23% 26% 19% 11% 25% 31% In Naples 10+Years 54% 17% 4% 13% 22% 21% 8% 18% 27% Synagogue Member 80% 25% 11% 25% 40% 30% 16% 25% 43% Synagogue Non -Member 45% 10% 1% 3% 11% 13% 4% 14% 17% MCA/WCA Member 83% 25% 6% 18% 36% 31% 13% 22% 41% MCA/WCA Non -Member 46% 11% 4% 17% 16% 15% 7% 20% 21% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 198 M y C: JO O ca � t 0 4J C O A C C -O < O Organizations a) N 41 Q 'E N � C M >_ N '� v�� a) N a)Q '� v > > > a a d Overall 14% 7% 16% No Involvement 0% 0% Low Involvement 2% 6% 4% Mod. Involvement 14% 10% 18% High Involvement 50% 6% 51% Unmarried 11% 10% 13% Inmarried 17% 8% 20% Intermarried 10% 2% 10% Year -Round 16% 16% Seasonal, Primary 14% 5% 16% Seasonal, Secondary 8% 12% 19% In Naples < 10 Years 16% 12% 20% In Naples 10+Years 13% 4% 15% Synagogue Member 20% 8% 24% Synagogue Non -Member 10% 7% 11% MCA/WCA Member 22% 8% 24% MCA/WCA Non -Member 10% 7% 12% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 199 (� L (6 4- Q ii 4 Q ii " -C + " L L O a! L O aJ N " 4! o f v o f Ya' 0+ 0 3> 0 3� o z a o v Z Jewish Activities � �, z � �, � 0 - > 0 LL � � z � � 2 0 o � 0 o � J C J i 4cJ Vf 3 " 3 J J 3 U J N J " Ul J a +' 4 C J J C " i VI O L L U U Q Q C C 0 O H a�i Qj a�i v Q N N Overall 82% 4% 42% 24% 14% 50% 39% 36% 51% No Involvement 93% 3% 70% 22% 39% 11% 63% 8% 95% Low Involvement 92% 2% 45% 17% 13% 39% 51% 30% 62% Mod. Involvement 80% 3% 39% 24% 7% 65% 25% 45% 36% High Involvement 56% 7% 18% 41% 3% 83% 23% 58% 23% Unmarried 87% 2% 53% 29% 25% 38% 61% 22% 55% Inmarried 75% 6% 34% 25% 5% 63% 28% 43% 45% Intermarried 96% < 1% 52% 11% 22% 31% 36% 41% 66% Year -Round 83% 4% 42% 26% 16% 43% 42% 33% 53% Seasonal, Primary 85% 2% 52% 17% 13% 62% 32% 39% 50% Seasonal, Secondary 73% 5% 25% 31% 6% 60% 41% 45% 45% In Naples < 10 Years 78% 6% 34% 25% 10% 55% 31% 41% 44% In Naples 10+Years 84% 3% 46% 24% 15% 49% 43% 34% 54% Synagogue Member 66% 7% 36% 28% 7% 71% 29% 49% 39% Synagogue Non -Member 94% 1% 47% 22% 19% 36% 47% 26% 61% MCA/WCA Member 78% 4% 35% 28% 9% 67% 32% 43% 36% MCA/WCA Non -Member 84% 4% 47% 22% 16% 41% 44% 32% 61% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 200 + X � ~ X ~ Jewish Activities ate- Y � - 2i � ate-.+ � � Y Q 22 �v +';°' z +) J N 3 *—' J M v c v Q U 1 ,� c 16 +� N Ln Overall 21% 79% 10% No Involvement 4% 97% 3% Low Involvement 14% 85% 3% Mod. Involvement 27% 75% 13% High Involvement 37% 62% 25% Unmarried 22% 83% 6% Inmarried 25% 76% 15% Intermarried 4% 86% 2% Year -Round 22% 77% 11% Seasonal, Primary 19% 84% 10% Seasonal, Secondary 20% 80% 9% In Naples < 10 Years 22% 77% 12% In Naples 10+Years 21% 81% 9% Synagogue Member 29% 64% 21% Synagogue Non -Member 15% 91% 2% MCA/WCA Member 29% 82% 9% MCA/WCA Non -Member 16% 78% 11% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 201 L z C J C Ln C O J N C 3 o f6 7 c ao f6 c �O � c f6 = c f6 .7 c o C 3 Philanthropy a, o� O o — �NM +� .O — a3� oLnM O _ +, av — a,� O O -0 to O -0 O V a -0=E O o -0N O 0 L ^—' O N ^—' O fo N N C N .00 +J U Vl y co Vf U N V1 i N Q a fo 0 c w +' f° 0 M 0 v' 0 °' •°' o v L o 3 0 fo N -O c to O L O L O O on L f N ` O O O— 0 N —_ O c O O c O O +� a•.+ Q ao O i 0 O c O O C c 'O O 4' 'O LL U -a O O -0 O O fo O o 0 O Q o O O � O O O `� +- O Overall 92% 20% 80% 4% 57% 55% 60% 13% 23% 51% No Involvement 76% 69% 31% 3% Low Involvement 91% 22% 78% 3% 28% 44% 35% 6% 11% 35% Mod. Involvement 98% 4% 96% 6% 90% 59% 69% 13% 23% 46% High Involvement 98% 2% 98% 5% 98% 72% 96% 23% 49% 73% Unmarried 87% 30% 70% 6% 47% 36% 50% 11% 19% 50% Inmarried 95% 14% 86% 4% 67% 68% 68% 17% 26% 57% Intermarried 91% 23% 77% < 1% 43% 33% 47% 4% 18% 23% Year -Round 89% 30% 70% 6% 50% 44% 57% 12% 28% 45% Seasonal, Primary 96% 10% 90% 2% 73% 65% 73% 15% 22% 48% Seasonal, Secondary 99% 1% 99% 3% 52% 66% 50% 17% 14% 70% In Naples < 10 Years 92% 15% 85% 5% 57% 55% 53% 14% 15% 48% In Naples 10+Years 92% 23% 77% 4% 57% 54% 65% 13% 27% 52% Synagogue Member 2% 3% 97% 4% 78% 87% 66% 18% 32% 58% Synagogue Non -Member 12% 33% 67% 5% 41% 19% 55% 9% 14% 42% MCA/WCA Member 98% 5% 95% 4% 82% 61% 80% 16% 29% 55% MCA/WCA Non -Member 89% 30% 70% 5% 42% 49% 44% 12% 18% 46% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 202 N a) o Philanthropy c a (13 v � (1) N '3 c .0 N v ; N N O v 0 0a z 0 v Cr 0 v J Overall 58% 13% 4% No Involvement 9% 7% 0% Low Involvement 51% 10% 2% Mod. Involvement 69% 17% 5% High Involvement 93% 17% 11% Unmarried 44% 16% 2% Inmarried 65% 14% 5% Intermarried 57% 5% 4% Year -Round 52% 14% 2% Seasonal, Primary 72% 13% 9% Seasonal, Secondary 51% 10% 1% In Naples < 10 Years 53% 17% 5% In Naples 10+Years 59% 11% 3% Synagogue Member 71% 16% 8% Synagogue Non -Member 48% 11% 1% MCA/WCA Member 77% 14% 5% MCA/WCA Non -Member 46% 12% 4% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 203 v v Q C = L N — V) L �' 41 � O- V) Z OJ � i d, a) o Z L La) E L O O F C OJ N Health and w co _ -Q N '5 v -O C 'U v L -0 = C U -6 O U Qj -0 } O iD N dA o ._ v L �� N Ln �� V) �.�' _ E O o v C 1 E N v v� N Q Wellness ' O _ 41 N ai � 41 v •C � N 7 = � � o � � v Q = Q o ' _ _ N _ U_ O = O OC U Overall 8% 20% 10% 10% 10% 13% 15% 6% 6% No Involvement 9% 25% 1% 0% 0% 19% 0% 0% 2% Low Involvement 2% 20% 17% 6% 16% 13% 38% 10% 7% Mod. Involvement 4% 16% 7% 29% 9% 10% < 1% 6% 7% High Involvement 4% 23% 15% 7% 15% 12% < 1% 7% 5% Unmarried 4% 32% 9% 11% 9% 25% 4% 7% 8% Inmarried 3% 18% 10% 10% 13% 8% 25% 6% 6% Intermarried 9% 6% 15% 13% 6% 6% 50% 5% 1% Year -Round 5% 23% 12% 8% 10% 14% 14% 5% 5% Seasonal, Primary 4% 15% 7% 14% 10% 7% 14% 4% 7% Seasonal, Secondary < 1% 20% 9% < 1% 12% 16% 0% 16% 7% In Naples < 10 Years 4% 10% 12% 8% 4% 3% 33% 5% 6% In Naples 10+Years 4% 25% 10% 10% 13% 17% 12% 7% 6% Synagogue Member 3% 18% 12% 8% 13% 10% 10% 6% 9% Synagogue Non -Member 5% 21% 9% 11% 9% 14% 14% 7% 4% MCA/WCA Member 4% 15% 7% 29% 9% 7% < 1% 5% 4% MCA/WCA Non -Member 4% 24% 12% < 1% 12% 16% 19% 7% 7% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 204 1� Q " O O ao O >, a .� ro Financial Well- to en vona a L Qj �7 L ° a a+ � a u ° � a °' " a � U (a > 2 °' " a a v ;_ ig� M" a Zb\A o o 0 0 O 0 a a E a ai E '�LI) a °J v s 3 0• " O 3 a cOv 3 , L c� c o � . 4 c a � a N a Being (1/2) " + " cn +' 4� " N t]A 4 O O � 2 V 2 N 2 a i > 2 m > 2 x w i= + 2 C 2 _ Q 2 2 2 v 3 2 U 2 ca.� S " w ru a a a a J J N Overall 17% 13% 85% 2% 2% 15% 7% 16% 16% 84% 1% 3% 13% No Involvement 20% 10% 82% 3% 1% 5% 1% 73% 5% 78% 0% 0% 6% Low Involvement 18% 12% 76% 1% 2% 16% 11% 14% 14% 84% 1% 6% 13% Mod. Involvement 18% 11% 78% 3% 4% 19% 8% 8% 22% 84% 1% 3% 16% High Involvement 8% 15% 85% 1% 1% 14% 4% 7% 18% 90% 2% 2% 18% Unmarried 17% 8% 95% 1% 2% 7% 11% 44% 6% 89% 3% 3% 13% Inmarried 14% 12% 79% 2% 2% 18% 5% 11% 21% 83% < 1% 4% 16% Intermarried 24% 15% 64% 4% 4% 20% 6% 10% 16% 78% 0% 2% 5% Year -Round 22% 11% 76% 3% 4% 6% 11% 32% 8% 81% 1% 2% 16% Seasonal, Primary 9% 12% 84% < 1% < 1% 34% 2% 3% 29% 85% < 1% 3% 11% Seasonal, Secondary 10% 14% 83% 1% < 1% 14% < 1% 9% 21% 92% < 1% 10% 10% In Naples < 10 Years 14% 13% 77% 2% 4% 14% 7% 11% 15% 79% 1% 3% 13% In Naples 10+Years 17% 12% 80% 2% 1% 15% 7% 26% 16% 86% 1% 4% 14% Synagogue Member 16% 13% 79% 2% 1% 24% 4% 7% 25% 83% < 1% 3% 17% Synagogue Non -Member 16% 11% 79% 2% 3% 9% 9% 31% 10% 85% 1% 3% 11% MCA/WCA Member 6% 10% 88% < 1% 1% 18% 5% 7% 19% 94% 2% 1% 14% MCA/WCA Non -Member 23% 13% 72% 3% 3% 13% 8% 29% 14% 78% < 1% 4% 13% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 205 -0 O - 'a -0 N -a U 'a ° _0 aJ E c v +� v 3 U a) � v 3 tub v O U +� a) W U C -a ° < C a, N O i +� Financial Well- aJ O aJ a) Q T N aJ O i aJ 0 ` ' � a) r c (Q C - i C Q °' � " C -0 w aJ � aJ � •L J aJ .L aJ .� L ° a) " v •L aJ Q �+ N •L aJ 2 '� aJ 0 'L Q 7 w Q C� CL Y ° C O a CU C C Q E aJ aJ J C UIJ C -�S � C C Being Qua Q" Q� N Q CL C to a, ,�C 0 N .� " (2/2) w" w N w= O w" �� aJ w" w N a) w _ 4J a -0 O w =� " c) a ° =m =_ __ __ _ U,LL Overall 1% 3% < 1 % 2% 1% 3% 19% 1% 5% 4% 85% No Involvement 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6% 0% 3% 3% 77% Low Involvement 2% 5% < 1% 2% < 1% 4% 23% 1% 5% 4% 80% Mod. Involvement 2% 2% < 1% 3% 1% 3% 20% 2% 6% 4% 89% High Involvement 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 23% 1% 6% 6% 91% Unmarried 1% 1% 1% < 1% 1% 8% 21% 3% 3% 4% 76% Inmarried 1% 3% < 1% 2% 1% 1% 20% < 1% 6% 4% 88% Intermarried 3% 4% 0% 5% < 1% 0% 13% 1% 6% 4% 89% Year -Round 2% 2% 1% 3% 1% 4% 22% 2% 5% 7% 77% Seasonal, Primary 0% 1% < 1% 1% < 1% < 1% 13% < 1% 2% 1% 93% Seasonal, Secondary 0% 7% 0% 0% 0% 2% 19% 2% 10% < 1% 99% In Naples < 10 Years 1% 1% 0% 1% < 1% 2% 17% 2% 6% 5% 86% In Naples 10+Years 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% 3% 20% 1% 5% 4% 84% Synagogue Member 3% 2% < 1% 2% 1% 2% 21% 2% 4% 4% 88% Synagogue Non -Member < 1% 3% 1% 2% 0% 3% 17% 1% 6% 4% 82% MCA/WCA Member 1% 1% 1% < 1% 1% 3% 17% 2% 7% 3% 91% MCA/WCA Non -Member 1% 3% < 1% 3% < 1% 2% 20% 1% 4% 5% 80% 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 206 Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: The proposed Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict is a partially developed 13.5± acre parcel. The Subdistrict proposes an additional 22,000 square feet of religious and social organization uses and an increase to 200 pre-school students on the site. The property is zoned Estates and currently permits a church (religious facility). The property is currently developed with a 302-seat church (religious facility) and a pre-school that was approved for 70 children. The public facilities analysis evaluates the project impacts on potable Water, wastewater, drainage, parks, schools, roadways, fire/EMS, and solid waste. The source for the LOS information is the 2018 AUIR. Potable Water The property is located within the Collier County potable water service area. Non-residential development does not directly facilitate population growth and will have no impact on potable water facility capacity. Sanitary Sewer The subject project is served by a private septic system and will continue to utilize a septic system for waste disposal. This Project will have no impact on the Wastewater treatment system capacity. Arterial and Collector Roads Please refer to the Traffic Impact Statement for discussions of the project's impact on level of service for arterial and collector roadways within the project's radius of development influence. Drainage The County has adopted a LOS standard for private developments which requires development to occur consistent with water quantity and quality standards established in Ordinances 74-50, 90-10, 2001-27, and LDC Ordinance 2004-41, as may be amended. An environmental Resource Permit (ERP) issued by the South Florida Water Management District will be required, which has established criteria for the volume of water stored on site as well as the quality of the water, October 29, 2019 Page 1 of 3 JFGNA-18 Exhibit VE Public Facilities-rev2.docx ® GradyiN inor cis it 1?ugIncers • band Svncyors • f 1anncrs • I,andscapc Archl[ccts Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis which may be discharged from the site. The development within the subdistrict will be consistent with the County LOS standards. Solid Waste The adopted LOS for solid waste is two years of lined cell capacity at the previous 3 year average tons per year disposal rate and 10 years of permittable landfill capacity of the disposal rate. There are no current capacity issues and none are anticipated through the year 2067. Existing: Proposed Church (Religious Facility): 302 seats x 1.24 lb/day/person Pre-school: 70 Students @ llb/student/day 20 staff @ llb/staff/day = 374.5 Ibs/day = 70 Ibs/day = 20 Ibs/day Total = 464.5 Ibs/day 574.5 Ibs/day x 365 = 209,692 - 2,000 = 105 tons/year Church (Religious Facility): 302 seats x 1.24 lb/day/person Community Facility: 22,000 x 5 Ibs/1,000 sq ft Pre-school: 200 Students @ llb/student/day 20 staff @ llb/staff/day = 374.5 Ibs/day = 110 Ibs/day = 200 Ibs/day = 25 Ibs/day Total = 709.5 Ibs/day 709.5 Ibs/day x 365 = 258,968 - 2,000 = 130 tons Current landfill capacity in 2018 is anticipated to be 17,001,964 tons. Total Permitted Landfill Capacity Remaining, 2017 17,244,316 Tons Required Permitted Landfill Capacity, 2017 2,625,495 Tons Total Lined Cell Capacity Remaining, 2017 2,372,915 Tons Required Lined Cell Capacity, 2017 490,736 Tons October 29, 2019 JFGNA-18 Exhibit VE Public Facilities-rev2.docx ® GradyiN inor cis it 1?ugIncers • band Svncyors • f 1anncrs • I,andscapc ArchItccts Page 2 of 3 Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis Source: Collier County 2018 AUIR Cal Recycle Parks: Community and Regional Parks impact fees are not assessed for commercial development or schools. No adverse impacts to Community or Regional Parks result from the amendment of the subdistrict. Schools School impact fees are not assessed for commercial development or schools. No adverse impacts to schools result from the creation of the subdistrict. Fire Control and EMS The proposed project lies within the North Collier Fire Rescue District. The North Collier Fire Rescue District - Station #46 is located at 3410 Pine Ridge Rd, which is approximately 3.9 miles from the western property boundary. The Greater Naples Fire Rescue District - Station #70 is located at 4741 Golden Gate Parkway, which is approximately 3.8 miles from the eastern property boundary No significant impacts to Fire Control level of service are anticipated due to the proposed project. Estimated impact fees for EMS and fire would be determined at time of SDP based on each unit. Sheriff, Fire Protection and EMS Services location/address of facilities intended to serve the project are; North Collier Fire Rescue District - Station #46 3410 Pine Ridge Rd Greater Naples Fire Rescue District - Station #70 4741 Golden Gate Parkway Collier County Sheriff's Office - District 2 (Golden Gate City Substation) 4707 Golden Gate Parkway October 29, 2019 Page 3 of 3 JFGNA-18 Exhibit VE Public Facilities-rev2.docx ® GradyiN inor cis it 1?ugIncers • band Svncyors • f 1anncrs • I,andscapc ArchItccts Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com VA LSE gILT BEACH ROA neyards E.S. - -- - - Vineyards Community Park Headqua 0 J Li � F- ES-. Cj co FA G Max Hasse Park Osceola SUBJECT ®Barra Collier PROPERTY Pine R�dge S. �� a H Physicians Regional Pine Ridge orthN D,eBI�Staion40 E OAD _ WHITE BLVD. o e North ap es a Ion 46 r_ EMedic z � < O M V) m >F— � z M D14A Rita Eaton LEGEND J Neighborhood a 0 T Park � z a SCHOOLS ®G Id n Gafe-f,S.: PARKS s O D o F FIRE STATIONS m olden Gate E EMERGENCY MEDICAL STATIONS I intermediate GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS °qa [on_Lutz Neighborhood Park _ * SHERIFF'S STATIONS AND mil Golden Gale Community—Uenter SUBSTATIONS olden Gate Library m Golden Gate Substation East Naples Station 4 - Golden Gale Station 7�0 LIBRARIES North Naples Station 47 EMedic 70 W Medic E.S.24 p WATER TREATMENT PLANTS Poinciana E.Q H PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEMS AND olden Terra11 HOSPITALS z p EXISTING OR MODIFIED ®Golden GAen z z WATER RETENTION STRUCTURES �, 5 SOLID WASTE FACILITIES TE PKWY errace 0 2000'4000' ate } WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS SCALE. 1 ° = 4000' a z TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT Sam GradyMinor Q. Grady Mhmr cold AHtl Url0le5. P.A. JOBICODE: ai9111 Viu Del Rey dma -18 Bonito Slrmn s, Plarlda 3113' Mn M 2019 Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects EXHIBIT V.E. FnENA : o Celt. or Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Busbies LC 26000266 PUBLIC FACILITIES MAP JFGHn-,e IXHIBR Vf Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 www. Gr•ady44irrnr•. nnm Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 SHEET 1 OF 1 0 OCUJIgn tnvelope IU: uzoutl-I-Hb41..-4r U23-C/CS t-L/yy-I-I mmt4t) Exhibit V.E.1 JIMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATI❑N ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT For Temple Shalom PUD (Pine Ridge Road, Collier County, Florida) June 14, 2019 Revised January 15, 2020 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500, 00 TIS (Major Study) Review Fee=$1,500.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSP❑RTATI❑N ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AvENUE SW NAPLES, FL❑RIOA 3411 9 CERTIFICATE OF AUTH❑RIZATI❑N N❑. 278 DocuSignedby: .n 1 {PROJECT N❑. 19021 2) f `] f� No 43860 i e DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 TABLE OF CONTENTS Conclusions 2 Methodology 3 Scope of Project 4 Table A - Proposed Development 4 Figure 1 - Project Location & E+C Road Classification 4.1 ,Site Plan 4.2 Project Generated Traffic 5 Table B - Net New Trips Generated 5 Table 1A - Existing Land Use Trip Generation Computations 5.1 Table 1B - Proposed Land Use Trip Generation Computations (Average Weekday & Weekend Conditions) 5.2 Table 1C - Proposed Land Use Trip Generation Computations (Special Events Weekday) 5.3 Existing + Committed Road Network 6 Project Traffic Distribution 6 Area of Significant Impact 6 Figure 2 - Project Traffic Distribution 6.1 Table 2 - Area of Impact/Road Classification 6.2 Site Access Conditions 7 Figure 3 - Project Traffic Assignment (Typ. Weekday) 7.1 Figure 4 - Project Traffic Assignment (Special Events) 7.2 2019 thru 2022 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions 8 Table 3 - 2019 & 2022 Link Volumes 8.1 Table 4 - 2022 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 8.2 Appendix 9 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 Conclusions Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that the proposed rezoning of the Temple Shalom to a CFPUD will not have a negative impact upon the surrounding road network. It was verified that all roadways, within the project's area of influence, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the additional site -generated traffic associated with increasing the size of the existing worship/administrative/daycare structures from 44,400 square feet to a total of 50,000 square feet and increasing the daycare enrollment from 70 to 200 children and constructing a new building that will house 22,000 square feet of religious/civic assembly space and associated offices. As determined, the road network will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for the foreseeable future and the project will not create any off -site transportation deficiencies that need to be mitigated. Site Access & Onsite Parking Vehicular ingress/egress for Temple Shalom and daycare was previously established via one (1) full median opening on Pine Ridge Road. The access is located near the site's eastern boundary and it has a westbound left -ingress turn lane and an eastbound right - ingress turn lane and a shared left/right exit lane. It was determined that this access will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service after the completion of the proposed expansion, but will require law enforcement personnel to control traffic during special events as discussed below. At the time of acquiring development permits, the access will be reevaluated to determine needed improvements (e.g., extending the westbound left turn lane, additional site egress lane, etc.). In order to accommodate the additional traffic demands generated by the proposed land uses, a second point of ingress/egress on Pine Ridge Road will be constructed. The new access will be located to the west of the existing full access and will be limited to right- in/out turning movements. The design of the right-in/out access, which will warrant a right -ingress turn lane, will be finalized at the time of seeking development approval. Although Temple Shalom has full access on Pine Ridge Road, it is expected that some drivers that intend to exit to the west will choose to perform a downstream u-turn vs. turning left -out at the median opening. To accommodate this movement, it is proposed to construct a turn lane at an existing median opening that is approximately 0.2 miles east of the site's full access. The turn lane will provide drivers with a safe means of reversing their direction of travel. In conjunction with constructing the downstream u-turn lane, an eastbound -to -westbound "No U-Turn" sign will be posted at the site's full access where there is not a turn lane to accommodate that type of movement. The purpose of posting the "No U-Turn" sign will be to cause motorists to use the newly constructed downstream turn lane. The rezoning request also includes increasing the campus' shared -use parking capacity and improving on -site circulation by interconnecting the parking areas. The parking areas will also be interconnected to both points of access on Pine Ridge Road. 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 Special Events Parking, Traffic Demands & Site Access Traffic Controls The common daily functions of Temple Shalom include various religious gatherings, religious studies, youth and adult activities/classes, as well as providing daycare service. These various functions occur on weekdays and weekends, except for the daycare that is only open to the public on weekdays. In addition to typical daily operations, Temple Shalom occasionally hosts special events or has unusually high -attendance religious gatherings (i.e., 400 or more attendees). These types of high -demand events include non- typical or high -demand religious ceremonies, weddings, civic gatherings, etc. It is planned that some of these events will be held within the proposed civic/religious assembly building. These special events are and will continue to be scheduled in a manner so they do not coincide with the normal operations of the Temple's religious practices or daycare; and the events will not have overlapping start/completion times. As part of the amendment request, the shared -use parking capacity will be increased. The additional parking spaces will be more than adequate to accommodate campus' typical parking demands, as well as provide needed capacity for special events. Most often, these special events will occur between the hours of 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM. However, this study evaluates the site's ingress/egress capacity and safety provisions during weekday PM peak demand periods (i.e., 4 to 6 PM). Because the proposed 22,000 square feet of civic/religious assembly space can accommodate the greatest number of attendees (estimated to be up to 706 people), the traffic conditions were analyzed based upon the maximum occupancy of this space during PM peak hour weekday operations and based upon normal operations of the synagogue and the daycare. During these high traffic demand conditions, the study determined that the employment of a law enforcement officer is necessary to safely maintain ingress/egress for special events, which is defined as 400 or more attendees at any event. Furthermore, it was determined that the site's full access and east/west traffic flow on Pine Ridge Road will operate at LOS C or better when controlled by law enforcement personnel during these peak demand special event traffic conditions. Therefore, the PUD must be subject to a condition that all events having 400 or more attendees, shall employ law enforcement personnel to control traffic flow at the PUD's access on Pine Ridge Road- This condition shall apply to weekdays and weekends and regardless of the time of day that the high - demand event occurs. Methodology On May 1, 2019, a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Methodology Report was submitted to the office of Collier County Transportation Planning Department. The $500.00 methodology meeting fee will be paid at the time of submitting the zoning amendment application. A copy of the TIS methodology has been provided in the appendix (refer to pages M1 thru M11). Note, the project's traffic distribution was subsequently revised based upon additional information provided by the owners/operators of the proposed synagogue and daycare land uses, and the project's build -out has been extended to the year 2022. 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 Scope of Project Temple Shalom is an existing place of worship with daycare services and other associated functions (e.g., administrative offices, religious education, youth and adult activities, etc.). It is proposed to rezone the property to a CFPUD and increase the size of the existing worship/administrative/daycare structures from 44,400 square feet to a total of 50,000 square feet, and increase the daycare attendance from 70 to 200 children, and construct a new building that will house 22,000 square feet of associated office/assembly space and construct one (1) additional access on Pine Ridge Road, which will be restricted to right-in/out turning movements. The site is located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road and approximately three-quarters of a mile to the west of Collier Boulevaxd, within Collier County. It is expected that the proposed improvements will be completed by the year 2022. Table A Proposed Land Use Land Uses Existing Size/Capacity Proposed Size/Capacity Net Difference Synagogue 44,400 s.f 50,000 s.f + 5,600 s.f. (Includes admin offices, etc.) 302 Seats 302 Seats Daycare 70 Students 200 Students + 130 Students Assembly Space and Offices None 22,000 s.f. + 22,000 s.f. 11 DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 I Vanderbilt Beach Rd NORTH I N.T.S. Z Golden Gate Boulevard ------------------- Q 6 I W O 41 C o � m 7 a] J m N U I I N Pine Ridge Road I , White Boulevard ---------- ......-------- 1 1 th Ave SW f I 13th Ave SW f 15th Ave SW I f Green Boulevard I I I � ! ! I ! I _ m I I I I I N r I � a a I Golden Gate Parkway I a m I ' r — — — — — — — — --I LEGEND 'I I 6-LA14E ARTERIAL 4-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR m 2-LANE ARTERIAL 2-LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL tj I RAIL ROAD ! rwr� .000 I TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERINs, INC. Temple Shalom PUD Project Location & FIGURE 1 Roadway Classification May 1, 2019 E, ESTATFS RESIDENTIAL ® MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' PINE RIDGE ROAD LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE, EAST OF PRESERVE, TO EXTEND 100' SOUTH MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPE'D'® LANDSCAPE. BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE PROPERTY _--( U—'--` L.177l °�000 I PROPERTY BOUNDARY BOUNDARY _ . MINIMUM 6' WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER �— c (GRASS PARKING F, BUILDING . o O ••-- AREA $ o RESERVATION (SEE \_ �> :,:• a NOTE #2 --- o " - 1i' -< �p E, ESTATES g E,ESTATES U' GRASS .'r�$ �' p RESIDENTIAL m PARKING -�, .. m 1 m o _ RESIDENTIAL '------ - a' ° z C f 70: [i .".". o N m (! BUILDING. 2s - p b - z - ° D MINIMUM 15' WkDE TYPE 'B' MINIMUM 15' ! m ` AREA A p m 4 LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH WIDE TYPE'B' ( PARKING4{ LANDSCAPE O �6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE o — u o BUFFER WITH 6` y G' RASS Iv ° HIGH ONCE LINKD I I `PARKING(( ILPRE-SCHOOL SEPTIC SYSTEM 5E TIC SYSTEM a°o0o°o°o� w LEGEND ® DRIVEWAY/PARKING OUTDOOR BUILDING TRACT 64ITRACT 65� PLAY AREA `TRACT 65ITRACT 6^= MINIMUM 15' WIDE TYPE'B' z SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH® _ g LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SDP-90-128 - TRACTS 65 & 68) RESIDENTIAL 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE 6 51 SCALE: 1" = 150' PRESERVE TRACT 64 AND PRESERVE PER SDP-90-12$ TRACT 65 & 68 WHEN KOTTED@8,5x 11 25 TEMPLE SHALOM CF'PUID Ji i•1 IF A'TIOA1 Q. fifAdy Mlnpr gnd AdBOCIfl IE9. P.A. 1❑1' N Gra dyMinor c"U I V[u nd ury roe con DEVIATION Runlla Pprlrlga. Flul,tu 94139rcua-le EXHIBIT C ChAlEngineers . LandSurveyars . P3annere . LaDdscapeArehifecta MASTER PLAN ME NAME! 0 Cevt-rAdd,. EBOddri, 51 Cerr nr AW'. L; WN 51 av,e,n LC xddddzdd REVISED: 10/24/2019 anew-le-uew-nova Bonita Byringei 239.947.1 tA4 uww.GraAyM1llnnr. r.nm Fort Muxre: 239.680: 138U SHEET I 6F 2 � DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 Project Generated Traffic Traffic that can be expected to be generated by the project was estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, I Wh Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses was relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was concluded that land use codes "Church" (LUC 560), "Day Care" (LUC 565 SIC Code 8351) and Small Office Building (LUC 712 associated with SIC Codes 8641,8661 & 6732) were most appropriate in estimating the existing and the proposed site -generated trips- Note, the trip estimates for the proposed 22,000 square feet of civic/religious assembly space/offices was increased by 50% to reflect a higher use of floor space than is typical of general office uses. That is, general office has an average use rate of 1 person/ 150 square feet and it is expected that the proposed space will have a usage of 1 person/100 square feet. In addition to the average weekday site -generated trips, the proposed civic/religious assembly space will occasionally host special events that can accommodate up to 706 attendees. Therefore, to account for trips generated during these special events, the ITE trip rates established for worship assemblies was used. The trips were determined based upon the maximum attendance of 706 people, and the trips were also doubled to account for a lower ride -share rate for non -religious gatherings. In order to determine the project's net new traffic, the estimated trips for the existing uses were subtracted from the estimated total trips for the proposed. That is, Proposed Development Trips less Existing Development Trips = Net New Trips Table IA (refer to page 4.1) provides a detail of the estimated total trips for the existing land uses and Table I (refer to page 4.2) gives the trips for the existing + proposed land uses. Table B summarizes the results from Tables lA and Table 1B, as well as depicts the net increase in site -generated trips. Table E Net New Trips Generated (Proposed Trips Less Existinz Trips) Net New Net New Net New Weekend Daily Trips AM Peak PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Special Events (ADT) Hour (vph) (vph) (vph) (vph) Existing Land Uses 586 70 74 427 (See Table 1A) Existing & Proposed 1,618 221 237 427 Land Uses See Table 1 B) Net New Trips 1,032 151 163 0 891 99 in/ 52 exit 65 in/ 98 exit 433 in/458 exit 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 TABLE 1A TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Temple Shalom EXISTING LAND USE - WEEKDAY Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 560 Church (Weekday) 44,400 s.f. 565 Day Care Center 70 Students Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 560 Church (Weekday) 44,400 s.f. Daily Traffic (ADT) = T=6.14(X) + 17.09= 290 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.36(X) - 0.74 = 15 vph 9 / 6 vph 60% Enter/ 40% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.37(X) + 3.90 = 20 vph 9 / 11 vph 45% Enter/ 55% Exit = 565 Day Care Center (Weekday) 70 Students Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 3.56(X) + 47.23 = 296 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.66(X) + 8.42= 55 vph 29 / 26 vph 53% Enter/ 47% Exit PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X)+0.29 = 54 vph 25 / 29 vph 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = WEEKDAY TOTALS Daily Traffic (ADT) = 586 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = 70 vph 38 / 32 vph PM Peak Hour (vph) 74 vph 34 / 40 vph EXISTING LAND USE - SATURDAY & SUNDAY Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 560 Church (Weekend) 302 Seats 560 Church (Weekend) 44,400 s.f. Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips Enter Exit 560 Church (Weekend) 302 Seats Daily Traffic (ADT) = T=1.21(X) = 365 ADT Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.63(X) - 76.74 = 114 vph 56 / 58 vph 49% Enter/ 51% Exit = 560 Church (Weekend) 44,400 s.f. Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 27.63(X) = 1,227 ADT Peak Hour (vph) = T= 8.18(X) + 63.81 = 48% Enter/ 52% Exit = 427 vph 205 / 222 vph DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 TABLE 1B TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Temple Shalom EXISTING + PROPOSED LAND USE - WEEKDAY Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 560 Church (Weekday) 50,000 s.f. 565 Day Care Center 200 Students 712 Small Office Building 22,000 s.f. Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 560 Church (Weekday) 50,000 s.f. Da ly Traffic (ADT) = T=6.14(X) + 17.09= 324 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.36(X) - 0.74 = 17 vph 10 / 7 vph 60% Enter/ 40% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.37(X) + 3.90 = 22 vph 10 / 12 vph 45% Enter/ 55% Exit = 565 Day Care Center (Weekday) 200 Students Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 3.56(X) + 47.23 = 759 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.66(X) + 8.42= 140 vph 74 / 66 vph 53% Enter/ 47% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X)+0.29 134 vph 63 / 71 vph 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = LUC 712 ❑aily Traffic (ADT) = AM Peak Hour (vph) _ PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= [16.19(X)] x 1.5 = (See Note No.2) T= [1.92(X)] x 1.5 = 83% Enter/ 18% Exit = T= [2.45(X)] x 1.5 = 32% Enter/ 68% Exit = 534 ADT 63 vph 52 / 11 vph 81 vph 26 / 55 vph WEEKDAY TOTALS Daily Traffic (ADT) = 1,618 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = 221 vph 137 / 84 vph PM Peak Hour (vph) = 237 vph 99 / 138 vph Notes: Trip estimates for the proposed 22,000 square feet of assembly space/office were doubled to reflect a higher use of floor space than is typical of general office space. That is, general office has an average use rate of 1 person/150 square feet and it is expected that the proposed space will have a useage rate of 1 person/100 square feet. J. 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 TABLE 1C TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Temple Shalom EXISTING + PROPOSED LAND USE - WEEKDAY (Special Events) Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 560 Church (Weekday) 50,000 s.f. 565 Day Care Center 200 Students N/A Special Events (Weekday) 706 Attendants Code Trip_Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 560 Church (Weekday) 50,000 s.f. Daily Traffic (ADT) = T=6.14(X) + 17.09= 324 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.36(X) - 0.74 = 17 vph 10 / 7 vph 60% Enter/ 40% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.37(X) + 3.90 = 22 vph 10 / 12 vph 45% Enter/ 55% Exit = 565 Day Care Center (Weekday) 200 Students Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 3.56(X) + 47.23 = 759 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.66(X) + 8.42= 140 vph 74 / 66 vph 53% Enter/ 47% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X)+0.29 = 134 vph 63 / 71 vph 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = Special Events (Trips based upon ITE's Church Sunday Warship Rates x 2) Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 2 x [1.21(X)] = (See Note No.1) 1,709 ADT Peak Hour (vph) = WEEKDAY TOTALS (Special Events) T= 2 x [0.63(X) - 76.741 _ 49% Enter/ 51% Exit = Daily Traffic (ADT) PM Peak Hour (vph) _ 736 vph 361 / 375 vph 2,792 ADT 893 vph 434 / 459 vph Notes: The Assembly Hall can host special events for up to 706 attendees. Therefore, to account for trips generated during these special events, the ITE trip rates established for worship assemblies based on 706 attendants was used. The trip estimates were also doubled to account for a lower ride -share rate for non -religious gatherings. S. DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 Existing + Committed Road Network Figure 1 and Table 2 provide a detail of the surrounding E + C roadways. Table 2 also depicts the nearby roadways respective minimum level of service performance standards and capacity. Project Generated Traffic Distribution The project's net new traffic was distributed to the surrounding road network based upon logical means of ingress/egress, current and future traffic patterns in the area, demographics, as well as growth trends for the surrounding areas. Table 2 and Figure 2 provide a detail of the traffic distributions to the adjacent road network. Area of Significant Impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2 describes the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the projects area impact are shown in Table 2. 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 Z a 0 W 0 0 J L5 IF ham► w � = b\ s� I I � I I I v m 7 m IF I N � I O N 3 O d2 Gi O U 64 --��' ► Pine Ridge Road 34 I Green Boulevard 11th Ave SW � I err 13th Ave SW 15th Ave SW I Vanderbilt Beach Rd NORTH N.T.S. 1► Golden Gate Boulevard ------------------- 5�► White Boulevard I I I I I m I I � I I � I m I V I I I o I a'i I Golden Gate Parkway a I � LEGEND 0 c I �'/ I!-0% ► PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT En i JM���� TRANSPURTATIL]N EN1W1NLhM1N4i, INL:. Temple Shalom PUD Project -Generated FIGURE 2 p Traffic Distribution December 24, 2019 M. TABLE 2 PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT AVERAGE WEEKDAY OPERATIONS Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 98 Exiting Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) = 65 Entering LOS Service PK Dir. PK Direction Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic Class LOS (vphpd) % Dist. 31.1 County Road 951 Golden Gate Blvd to Pine Ridge 6D D 3000 15.0% 31.2 Pine Ridge to Green Blvd 6D D 3000 15.0% 48.0 Logan Blvd 49.0 68.0 Pine Ridge Road 125.a 125.b Vanderbilt to Pine Ridge Rd Pine Ridge Rd to Green Blvd 1-75 to Logan Blvd Logan Blvd to Site Site to Collier Blvd 2U D 4D D 6D E 4D D 4D D SPECIAL EVENTS WEEKDAY OPERATIONS Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 419 Exiting Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) = 400 Entering 1000 5% 1900 15% 2800 45% 2400 65% 2400 35% LOS Service PK Dir. PK Direction Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic Class LOS (vphpd) % Dist. 68.0 Pine Ridge Road 1-75 to Logan Blvd 6D E 2800 45% 125.a Logan Blvd to Site 4D D 2400 65% 125.b Site to Collier Blvd 4D D 2400 35% Project Pk Hr PK Dir (vphpd) 15 15 5 15 44 64 34 0 0 C) c Cn cn m m 0 CD 0 N 00 0 J V D rn A n Project 0 00 Project Pk Hr Project W Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent SignificaiN Pk Dir v h) DiR Standard Impact Impact N 10 S 2% 0.49% NO 8 S 10 N 2% 0.49% NO D N 3 s 2% 0.49% NO S 10 N 2% 0.77% NO w 29 E 2% 1.58% NO w 42 E 2% 2.65% YES E 23 w 2% 1.43% NO Project Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significant (vphpd) Pk Dir Lvp h DiR Standard Impact lm 189 w 180 E 2% 6.73% YES 272 w 260 E 2% 11.35% YES 147 E 140 w 2% 6.11 % YES DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 Site Access Conditions Vehicular ingress/egress for Temple Shalom and daycare was previously established via one (1) full median opening on Pine Ridge Road. The access is located near the PUD's eastern boundary and it has a westbound left -ingress turn lane and an eastbound right - ingress turn lane and a shared left/right exit lane. At the time of acquiring development permits for the proposed expansion, the existing median opening will be reevaluated to determine if improvements are warranted (e.g., extending the westbound left turn lane, additional site egress lane, etc.). In order to accommodate the additional traffic demands generated by the proposed land uses, a second point of ingress/egress on Pine Ridge Road will be constructed. The new access will be located to the west of the existing full access and will be limited to right- in/out turning movements. The design of the right-in/out access, which will warrant a right -ingress turn lane, will be finalized at the time of seeking development approval. Although the PUD has full access on Pine Ridge Road, it is expected that some drivers that intend to exit to the west will choose to perform a downstream a -turn vs. turning left - out at the median opening. To accommodate this movement, it is proposed to construct a turn lane at an existing median opening that is approximately 0.2 miles east of the site's full access. The turn lane will provide drivers with a safe means of reversing their direction of travel. In conjunction with constructing the downstream u-turn lane, an eastbound -to -westbound "No U-Turn'sign will be posted at the site's full access where there is not a turn lane to accommodate that type of movement. The purpose of posting the "No U-Turn" sign will be to cause motorists to use the newly constructed downstream turn lane. Figure 3 depicts the turning movement volumes that are anticipated to occur at the project's access on Pine Ridge Road during typical weekday operations at project build - out. Figure 4 details the turning movement volumes during weekday special events at project build -out. An analysis of the site's full access (STOP sign egress control) on Pine Ridge Road was performed and it was determined that during typical weekday conditions and during AM and PM peak hours, the site's full access will operate at acceptable levels of service. However, during special events (i.e-, 400 or more attendees of a hosted event), it was determined that a law enforcement officer will need to control traffic in order to maintain safe ingress/egress. It was found that east/west traffic flow on Pine Ridge Road will operate at LOS C or better when controlled by law enforcement personnel during these peak demand special events. Note, to emulate traffic control by law enforcement, the intersection was analyzed as a signalized intersection. Therefore, the PUD must be subject to a condition that all events having 400 or more attendees, shall employ law enforcement personnel to control traffic flow at the PUD's access on Pine Ridge Road. This condition shall apply to weekdays and weekends and regardless of the time of day that the high -demand event occurs. VA DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 co � c0 M N N - Proposed U-Turn Lane V; a a r ,_Y O Z Z � Cb `D CO (N n ¢ Q ¢ a Q N CO N g AM 26: PM 29 AM 47 PM 54 Temple Shalom Full Access T1 �_ n O a � U Posted "No U-Turn" U O a T 'n O Cr • • T � U aD Co LD a ¢ N :2 ¢ - ' c C � D g w AM 11 PM 55 Secondary Right—in/out Access a N I- 't < < ¢ a ¢ n rn r r v `t �� a 11 �rn Ln 'D� � a LEGEND AM 35 PM 34 ---► Existing Background Traffic AM 35 PM 34 -b Temple Shalom/Daycare Traffic Assign. ��M N1TRAN5P❑RTATI❑N ENGINEERING, INC. AM 35 PM 34 No Federation Traffic Assignment Project -Generated Temple Shalom PU D Traffic Assignment FIGURE 3 December 24, 2019 (Typ. Weekday Conditions) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 r-� C a �g a a- N �N N Proposed U- Turn Lane = � r ry a a s OZ Z 11 TT a r7 ip • � �p N N tp �A LD i 2 0- 4 N Q Q r ON [V r N a a ¢ ¢ AM 26: PM 29 AM 47 PM 54 AM 3 PM 244 Temple Shalom Full Access Sheriff Dept. Traffic Control During High Volume Speciai Events N n U N 0 p ,a C7 O Of d LO (D ¢ Q ¢ C: a> C n O CO Ln AM 4 PM 131 a a Secondary Right—in/out Access oin4 ¢a¢ f ,a N 0 LO Q Q a LEGEND AM 35 PM 34 10 Existing Background Traffic AM 35 PM 34 to Temple Shalom/Daycare Traffic Assign. �/� ,11IMTRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, IND. AM 35 PM s4 -1 Federation Traffic Assignment Project -Generated Temple Shalom PU D Traffic Assignment FIGURE 4 December 24, 2019 (Weekday Special Events) -7•Z DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 2019 thru 2022 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions In order to establish 2019 thru 2022 project build -out traffic conditions, two forecasting methods were used. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour/peak direction and annual growth rates were derived from the 2019 Collier County AUIR Report. Using the annual growth rate, the 2022 background traffic conditions were determined, which are depicted in Table 3. The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips (trip bank) identified in the 2019 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season, peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The vested trips 'Y' 2022 background traffic volumes are depicted in Table 3. The greater of the two values produced by the two forecasting procedures was then considered to reflect the 2022 background traffic. The net new project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 4 provides a summary of the 2019 thru 2022 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity. As shown, all project impacted roadways will continue to operate at the County's adopted minimum level of service thresholds at project build -out. 8 68.0 Pine Ridge Road 125.a 125.b TABLE 3 2019 & 2022 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2022 2022 Peak Hour 2019 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips (vphpd) DIR AUIR v h d vi phpol v( phpd) 1-75 to Logan Blvd 2160 E 2.00% 2292 1 2161 Logan Blvd to Site 1540 E 2.00% 1634 7 1547 Site to Collier Blvd 1540 E 2.00% 1634 7 1547 TABLE 4 2022 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMEICAPACITY ANALYSIS AVERAGE WEEKDAY OPERATIONS 2019 Peak Hour PK Direction vhd LOS 68.0 Pine Ridge Road 1-75 to Logan Blvd 2160 D 125.a Logan Blvd to Site 1540 D 125.b Site to Collier Blvd 1540 C 2022 2022 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Background Pk Background PK Dir of ohpd) Dir LOS v h d 2292 E D 44 1634 E D 64 1634 E C 34 Project Prjet Pk Hr Prjct Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Dir (vph) Dir W 29 E W 42 E E 23 W 2022 Build -Out Serv. Vol. Peak Hour Pk Hr PK Dir PK Dir vhd (vphpd) 2321 2800 1677 2400 1669 2400 0 0 C) c Cn cn m CD 0 CD 00 N 00 0 J v D rn a 2022 2022 a Build -Out Build-O p Peak Hour Peak He W PK Direction PK Direct W i m vlc Ratio LOS 0.83 D D.70 C 0.70 C D J A SPECIAL EVENTS WEEKDAY OPERATIONS sU 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2019 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build -Out Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Direction v( phpd) LOS (vphpd) Dir LOS of phpd) Dir fvph) Dir vhd vj phpd) vlc Ratio LOS 68.0 Pine Ridge Road 1-75 to Logan Blvd 2160 D 2292 E D 189 W 180 E 2472 2800 0.88 D 125.a Logan Blvd to Site 1540 D 1634 E D 272 W 260 E 1894 2400 0.79 C 125.b Site to Collier Blvd 1540 C 1634 E C 147 E 140 W 1781 2400 0.74 C DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 APPENDIX DocuSi n Envelope ID: 028C7117 A64C-4FD8 B76E 2799116AA746 two -Way General Information. Rop-Control Report Site Information Analyst JMB Transportation Eng Intersection Temple Shalom Site Access Agency/Co. Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/24/2019 East/West Street Pine Ridge Road Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Temple Shalom Site Access Time Analyzed AM Pk Typical Weekday Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Project Build -out Lanes Major Street east -West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1 U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T R L T L R Volume, V (veh/h) 533 59 41 2022 47 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 4.1 7.5 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 4.16 6.80 6.90 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.23 3.50 3.30 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 43 49 26 Capacity, c (veh/h) 947 189 723 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.26 0.04 95% Queue Length, Qvs (veh) 0.1 1.0 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.0 30.6 10.2 Level of Service, LOS A D B Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.2 23.5 Approach LO5 C Copyright O 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7'0 TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 12/26/2019 9:12:03 AM AM Weekday.xtw Al DocuSi n Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B76E-2799116AA746 W0-VVdY:3L.Up-Co.n.tr01Report, General Information Site Information Analyst JMB Transportation Eng Intersection Temple Shalom Site Access Agency/Co. Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/24/2019 East/West Street Pine Ridge Road Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Temple Shalom Site Access Time Analyzed PM Pk Typica€ Weekday Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Project Build -out Lanes Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments t. major Street', East-Vlest Approach Eastbound Westbound northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority It) 1 2 3 41J 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T R L T L R Volume, V (veh/h) 1686 47 31 687 53 29 Percent Heavy Vehicles (°Yo) 3 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked 0.000 0,000 0.000 Percent Grade (%} 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 4.1 7.5 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 4.16 6.80 6,90 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow -.Up Headway (sec) 2.23 3.50 3.30 Delay; Queue Length, and Level of Service. Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 33 56 31 Capacity, c (veh/h) 328 101 291 v/c Ratio 0.10 0.55 0.11 95%Queue Length, Q9s (veh) 0.3 2.6 0.4 Control Delay (s/veh) 17.2 77.6 18.9 Level of Service, LOS C F C Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.8 56.6 Approach LOS F Copyright D 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7M TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 12/26/2019 9:37:41 AM PM Weekday.xtw DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 ",L7,y„ancvu ,,rw,wction Results Summary General Information Intersection Information A 4 d d°�* +'' `. t r Agency Duration, h 0.25 Analyst JMB Transportation Eng Analysis Date 12/24/2019 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Time Period PM Peak Hour 2021 Project Build -out PHF Analysis Period 0.92 1> 7:00 Urban Street Pine Ridge Road Analysis Year Intersection Project Description Demand Information Temple Site Access PM Peak Special Events - File Name Sheriff Control EB PM Special Events.xus WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), vehlh 1780 47 155 665 297 29 Signal Information Cycle, s 120.0 _Offset, s I 0 Uncoordinated'- No Force Mode Fixed _... Reference Phase 2 Reference Point End Green 132 Yellow 2.0 77 .2 .23.6 2.0 2.0 D.D O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.D ! Simult. Gap EJW On Simult. Gap NIS On 0.0 0.0 Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 Timer Results ESL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT 2 Assigned Phase 1 6 8 7.3 Case Number 2.0 4.0 9.0 792 Phase Duration, s 15.2 94.4 Y 25.6 2.D Change Period, ( Y+R, ), s 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 .�._.. ._-,_.. a Max Allow Headway (MAH ), s 3.1 0.0 3.1 Queue ClearanceH Time (g s), s 13.0 22.9 l,_ Green Extension Time (g e ), s 00 0.3 0.0 0.7 Phase Call Probability 1.00 1.DD Max Out Probability 0.00 O.00 9 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R :... L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 2 12 1 6 3 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), vehlh 1935 51 168 `� 723 323 32 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate (s ), vehlh/ln 1809 1610 1810 1809 1810 ' 1610 Queue Service Time (g s ), s 49.2 0.6 11.0 6.9 20.9 1.9 u, Cycle Queue Cfearance Time( g c }, s �.. 49.2 0.6 11.0 6.9 20.9 = 1.9 Green Ratio ( g1C } - 0.64 0 84 ', 0.11 0.77 0.20 0.20 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2326 1352 199 ` 2785 356 -:. 31. Volume -to -Capacity Ratio ( X) 0.832 0.038 ! 0.845 _., 0.260 0.907 0.099 Back of Queue ( Q ), ftlln ( 95 th percentile} 667.9 ' 6.1 221.5 97 368.9 34.4 Back of Queue ( Q ), vehlln (95 th percentile) 26.7 0.2 8.9 3.9 14.8 1.4 Queue Storage Ratio ( Rd) (95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d ;) slveh 16.4 1.6 52.4 4.0 47.1 39.5 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), slveh 3.6 0.1 3.8 0.2 3.6 0.1 Initial Queue Delay (d s ), slveh [Control 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �.. 0.0 �... Deia d slveh Level of Service LOS 20.1 1.6 56.1 -... C A E 4.2 A 50.7 s395 ._ D D Approach Delay, slveh / LOS 19.6 B 14.0 B 49.7 D 0.0 Intersection Delay, slveh / LOS 21.4 C Multimodal Results _ EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score I LOS 2.2 T B 0.6 A 2.9 C 2.9 C icycle LOS Score 1 LOS 2.1 BP 1.2 A F Copy rig University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS7T11 Streets Version 7.3 Generated: 12126/2019 9:13:68 AM A3 H 535 CR 896 (Pine Ridge Road) east of Logan Blvd 2019 Sta 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Hour ENDING E1B W1B TOTAL EIB W1B TOTAL EIB WIB TOTAL EIB WIB TOTAL 1 0100 72 29 101 59 25 84 85 35 120 56 15 71 2 0200 43 27 70 40 29 69 43 39 82 24 13 37 3 0300 41 30 71 25 25 50 35 25 60 27 21 48 41 0400 21 35 56 33 40 73 40 45 85 17 45 62 5 0500 44 1231 172 45 109 154 40 951 135 36 1131 149 6 0600 84 338 422 88 328 416 75 290 365 96 4041 500 7 0700 280 983 1,263 290 935 1,225 262 835 11097 1 1,528 8 0800 376 1,545 1,921 403 1,488 1,891 360 1,288 1,648 526 2,017 2,543 9 0900 478 1,335 1,811 413 1,249 1,662 409 1,095 1,504 758 1, 2 2,080 10 1000 504 865 1,369 488 8451 1,333 462 830 1,292 532 927 1,459 11 1100 467 708 1,175 495 6861 1,181 480 710 1,190 575 724 1,299 12 1200 546 675 11221 566 612 1,178 535 635 1,170 644 646 1,290 13 1300 674 587 1,261 645 645 1,290 630 644 1,274 808 642 1,450 14 1400 747 622 1,369 711 566 1,277 635 535 1,170 749 586 1,335 15 1500 822 579 1,401 755 575 1,330 745 546 1,291 806 660 1,466 16 1600 1,077 621 1,698 939 526 1,465 913 605 1,518 1,182 761 1,943 17 1700 1,297 632 1,929 1,220 6551 1,875 1,243 465 1,708 1 4 6 2,113 18 1800 1,517 558 2,075 1,522 590 2,112 1.367 533 1,900 1,fi49 163 2,312 19 1900 1,056 508 1,564 959 495 1,454 826 419 1,245 1,585 20 2000 674 281 955 665 309 974 577 290 857 654 263 917 21 2100 463 211 674 506 230 736 472 216 688 523 225 748 22 2200 397 144 541 366 155 521 380 165 545 400 134 534 231 2300 1 207 103 310 245 1001 346 240 95 335 244 80 324 241 2400 147 55 202 135 60 195 162 55 217 115 421 157 TOTAL 1 12,0321 11,599 23,6311 11,613 11,2771 22,890 11,016 10,490 21,506 13,1031 12,847 25,950 DATE: 113l2019 DATE: 6/25/2019 NB Average 11,941 DATE: 7/3/2019 SB Average 11,553 Collier County Count Station 535 DATE: 11/512019 Annual Daily Average Ave. Daily Volume 23,494 I U: ULtR. / -I l /-Hb41..-4 r U25-C / CS t-L / yy -I -10AM / 4b JMB TRANSP©RTATI0N ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSP❑RTATI❑N ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT METHODOLOGY REPORT For Temple Shalom PUD (Pine Ridge Road, Collier County, Florida) May 1, 2019 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Major Study) Review Fee=$1,500.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 19 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION No. 27E330 (PROJECT No. 1 902 1 2) (/ I-/—' - E-1 -zo) I JAMES BANKS, P.E. DATE FLORI REG. No. 43860 AAI DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date:5-1-2019 Time: Location: Collier County Goverrunent Offices (North Horseshoe Drive) People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) James M. Banks, JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., 239-919-2767 2) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Government 3) 4) Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title: Jaynes M, Banks, P.E., President Organization: JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 4711 7th Avenue SW Naples, Florida 34119 (239)-919- 2767 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer Collier County Transportation Division Applicant - Applicant's Name: Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: Temple Shalom PUD Location: South side of Pine Ridge Road and about 3/4 miles west of Collier Blvd Land Use Type: ITE Code #: LUC 565 and LUC 712 Proposed number of development units: Existing is Worship Hall and 70 _student day care. Proposed is 200 student day care and 16,000 s.f of administrative offices. Other: Description: Zoning: PUD Existing: Comprehensive plan recommendation: Requested: Findings of the Preliminary Study: See the attached GAUsersUames iv1 Banksl0es&lopIPROJECTS1i CoNier G=P,4190212 Temple SrtalomlPAehSodvlogyRepor<dnc MZ DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 Study Type: Major Study Study Area: Boundaries: Based upon the County's 2%, 2% & 3% impact rule. See attached Additional intersections to be analyzed: None Horizon Year(s). 2022 Analysis Time Period(s): PM Peak Future Off -Site Developments: None Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition Table 1 Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: Pass -by trips: Internal trips (PUD): Transmit use: Other: Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 2023 per Collier County's 5-year CIE. Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates. See Attached Site -trip generation: See Table 1 Trip distribution method: Based upon manual assignment_ See Table 2 & Figure 2) Traffic assignment method: Traffic growth rate: Per Collier County Historical & Current AUIR Reports, but not less than 2% or background or vested trips method, whichever is greater. C.1UsmWamesM.8ankslDesWpIPROJECTaICWierCouW1902i2Temp%MaWWefhodof VRdpart.dw M3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Sight distance: Queuing: Access location & configuration: Traffic control: Signal system location & progression needs: On -site parking needs: Data Sources: Base maps: Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: Review process: Requirements: Miscellaneous: Small Scale Study — No Fee Minor Study - 5750.00 Major Study - $1500.00 X Includes 2 intersections Additional. Intersections - $500.00 each None Ali fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. Reviewers Applicant alusmvamas M. Banksf0eskiopPROJECT511 C0*rCounM1W212 Twpie 5halomWefwdoloyyRepatdoc M DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 i a 'w 3 0 m 0 0 J a - o > > 0 0 m m Ol U I � I I Pine Ridge Road I ---------- 0---------- Green Boulevard 1 1 th Ave SW I 13th Ave SW 15th Ave SW I Vanderbilt Seabh Rd NORTH N.T.S. Golden Gate Boulevard ------------------- White Boulevard r r r I I � I I I I o I m I 0 I I I I Golden Gate Parkway r m I �----------LEGEND 6-LANE ARTERIAL i 4-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR ----- m I / I 2-LANE ARTERIAL o I r 2-LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL In RAIL ROAD - • - I // I JM13 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERIN3, INC. Temple Shalom PUD Project Location & FIGURE 1 May 1, 2019 Roadway Classification `A S' DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Temple Shalom Land Use Code Land Use Description 565 Day Care Center 565 Day Care Center 712 Small Office Building Land Use Code Trip Period LUC 565 Existing Daily Traffic (ADT) = Existing AM Peak Hour (vph) _ Existing PM Peak Hour (vph) = Proposed Daily Traffic (ADT) = Proposed AM Peak Hour (vph) _ Proposed PM Peak Hour (vph) = Net New Daily Traffic (ADT) = Build Schedule 70 Existing Students 200 Proposed + Existing Students 16,000 s.f. Trip Generation Equation T= 3.56(X) + 47.23 = T= 0.66(X) + 8.42= 53% Enter/47916 Exit = Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X)+0.29 = 47% Enter/53% Exit = T= 3.56(X) + 47.23 = T= 0.66(X) + 8.42= 53% Enter/47% Exit = Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X)+0.29 = 47% Enter/53% Exit = T= 3.56(X) + 47.23 = Net New AM Peak Hour (vph) — T= 0.66(X) + 8.42= 53% Enter/ 47% Exit = Net New PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X)+0.29 = 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 296 ADT 55 vph 29 / 26 vpl i 54 vph 25 / 29 vph 759 ADT 140 vph 74 / 66 vph 134 vph 63 / 71 vph 463 ADT 86 vph 46 / 40 vph 80 vph 38 / 42 vph LUC 712 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 16.19(X) = 259 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 1.92(X) = 31 vph 25 / 5 vph 83% Enter/ 18% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T� 2.45(X) = 39 vph 13 J 27 vph 32% Enter/ 68% Exit = TOTALS Daily Traffic (ADT) = 722 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = 117 vph 71 / 46 vph PM Peak Hour (vph) = 120 vph 51 / 69 vph DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 a m 0 m v 0 J ni a I I I � I0 I I _ I o m X0 M 0 0 cV I M L v Q1 � I N 3 I a a I U Pine Ridge Rood U" — — — — — — — — — -w — — — — -- 11 th Ave SW u] 13th Ave SW 15th Ave SW l Green Boulevard r I > I r r r r Golden Gate Parkway r r 01 de / I / I r I I ( Vanderbilt Beach Rd NORTH N.T.S. Golden Gate Boulevard ------------------- 1► White Boulevard LEGEND a�i PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. Temple Shalom PUD PROJECT -GENERATED FIGURE 2 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION May 1, 2019 el 0 0 C) c Cn cn m m TABLE 2 CD PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT CD N 00 0 V V Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 69 Exiting > Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) = 51 Entering n 31 1 County Road $51 31.2 48.0 Logan Blvd 49.0 68.0 Pine Ridge Road 125.a 125.b 3 A 0 w LOS Service Project Project 00 W PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent N Significance Class LOS v( phpd) % Dist. v{ phpdj Pk Dir (vp_h} DiR Standard Impact Impact ; Golden Gate Blvd to Pine Ridge 6D D 3000 20.0% 14 N 10 S 0.46% NO D Pine Ridge to Green Blvd 6D D 3000 15.0% 10 S 8 N 0.35% NO Vanderbilt to Pine Ridge Rd 2U D 1000 5% 3 N 3 S 3% 0.35% NO Pine Ridge Rd to Green Blvd 4D D 1900 15% 10 S 8 N 3% 0.54% NO 1-75 to Logan Blvd 6D E 2800 35% 24 W 18 E 2% 0.86% NO Logan Blvd to Site 4D D 2400 55% 38 W 28 E 2% 1.58% NO Site to Collier Blvd 4D D 2400 45% 31 E 23 W 2% 1.29% NO 68.0 Pine Ridge Road 125.a 125.b TABLE 3 2018 & 2022 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2022 2022 Peak Hour 2018 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips of phpd) DiR AUIR v( phpd) of phpol v{ phpd) 1-75 to Logan Blvd 2190 E 2.00% 2371 1 2191 Logan Blvd to Site 1340 E 2.00% 1450 7 1347 Site to Collier Blvd 1340 E 2.00% 1450 7 1347 68.0 Pine Ridge Road 125. a 125.b 3 CIA 14:0 2022 ROADWAY LINK VOLUME/CAPACITY ANALYSIS 2022 2022 2022 2018 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir v( phpd) LOS (vphpol Dir LOS (vphpd) Dir (vph) Dir vj 2hpd (vphpd) 1-75 to Logan Blvd 2190 D 2371 E D 24 W 18 E 2388 2800 Logan Blvd to Site 1340 D 1450 E D 38 W 28 E 1479 2400 Site to Collier Blvd 1340 C 1450 E C 31 E 23 W 1482 2400 0 0 c Cn cn m m 0 00 N 00 0 J J D rn 2022 2022 n Build -Out Build-Oit Peak Hour Peak Ho0 PK Direction PK Direct c-40 i W We Ratio LOS m 0.85 D N J 0.62 C 0.62 C y D J A Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit Vs Flood Zone FeniffloodZones Final FEKA, DFIRZ�I 13age Flood Fleti ation Contours Flood Zones X�00 A AE AH VE X Subject Property — Flood Zones X500, AH (12) and X May 6, 2019 w GradyNnor Page 1 of 1 JFGNA-18 Exhibit VF.docx Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com EXHIBIT V.G.3 waazr _ ,area ram. e r Holly A. Harman 00 1 5 7 8 010 1 0 8 0 LIEBERFARB, TREISER, et al. _ rr: 801 12th Avenue South OR BOOK PAGE Naples, Florida 33940 nk hermod wwmw K- Holly A. Harman cC ...�: 801 12th Avenue South 5, Naples, Florida 33940 - .. _ .--`-�> wtt¢ rota,, atta u[ wu twxrsss rn s� rw4 tms utt rut n INS Ida-CWK PCOr F:ea,ated this /I dar of December A. D_ I9go • by LAND PROCUREMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited partnership (teal P-ty. 10 a„r TEMPLE SHALOM, INC., a Florida not -for -profit Corporation s whose raasto((ire addaes: u 1575 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, Florida 33940 T � EE a u_ se•rood party: a.,P,.p. o Th t 1Ai+$1 i�u[ -f iT" "Ytwmedt+tt i1"3•uof S 10. DO (TEN DOLLAR ) t� m hood paid by the.1. r t mop+ ahrreal : hr,•c"6a•..p�,,� tA` a . d«-: he..6r —ise..e- I— old quat elan. aai rsa and Iwrty Iore,er. all the right- t ue tiler l r d de aa.,d o.hieh the said lies, pans hots ikpad,,la°rhr lollw.ir� desa,ih«i lot. pin: or Iw `1o..d le. tying and hero, I, the Conaats of r Col her` State 1 Florida t I: Tract 64, less' and e*CepVt1 a"3D'oth, 45 feet of the North 75 t thereof; Tract 65, less the ¢forth ,S feet the&Shc "'""� Tract 68, loss the,'�lorth � feitathereo[,,,X all in Unit �6, Cat -DEN GATE EStAT•E5 itt accordance with and?subjeat to the plat $goit PYges�9iict 16' r Co nt Florida. t� recorded i Plat bfi� 'Ids 2ff all�e Y, By execui of �f is Quit Im j�.b t� rl lof e` tr 'rt' does Ielease any and mall of the ert nhts in t whic ver�tcreaed and retained in a that certa n War my Deedk ate¢) f1'lajy 4„ 1 90I nd rec gn Ala +•,17, 1990 in Official Records Sit P . 7 of" th0 Ppbtir R Ords of Collier Cot!ti Florida; which o reverter pfnved }i t=•itr`�the a"verit=•YYiat a e-Shalooilrw tic.,,.=TafIeri'tg tH mmaftP Con- struction of eel ous structure within (5) yei" of the to of 's2nt ldeed, the subject property I ert to the undersigned. The srX,ecutfn 1 •, General Par �f°'the party of the first part has ngh`t ppw@rtrtd authority purslent to :fse'rtrF of the governing partners)ti1`reaflpnt•" to'xcute this Quit Claim Deed. i n�..� 1� ape MA lYs. r��psa"`ut-Ifd pg k. the nppurtenanres themanto beL,..gire Q in ruse appertain+ g the r e ht, ,tia3e" teresI. Son. egatty and clout, wh d- soeter of the said (Irsl party. either io laa. or"igti<fy rrt�rkP"' �)y proper ase. benefit and &hoof a( the :aid second party (acee— sThe said ties, party has _.igat•d and sealed these presents the day and year Iirst al.a,e ttaiuen. Signed, -tiered in P peace o(: LAND PROCUREMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHI a Flonli limited partnership ------ ---- ------------- —. ..._---- — .. -- By: race S. Shermn General Partner STATE OF FLORIDA, cou.'TY OF Collier J Cc�.- = :._ •-'.. :' -::: a HEREBY CERTIFY ,hai ori'tl7isdij;'befo're art, an affi— duly a ud h. u c Safore.aid aed in the County a. aid take acino.teLSm per � 11y: appeared BRUCE S.•`SHERMAN, General Partner of LAND PROCUREMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHI , a Florida limtanta partnership _ ,aa •atino.:i�d d to me 1—n to be the ,er dexritM m and xho ucavted the foz g.m, insaumrn, �_ _ gc bforc me that he --ted ,he vn - - WIT\ESS my hand and offmi.l seal m ,he Coant. and Sta,c last aforesaid 'his IQ of d z � December A. D. 19 90 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20180003708and FL20180003710 I Daryl Sissman (print name), as President (title, If applicable) of Temple shalom, Inc. (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant =contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 55. We/1 authorizeQ Grady Minor& Associates, P.A. and Coleman. Yovanomch & Koester, P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. " • if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • if the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • if the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • in each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 2Ca Date The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on 0E S QQ gate) by Daryl Sissman (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as President oi7empleShalom, Inc. who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification) as identification.— �j� Qj4 SIO.fl L- PROS :� NaJ STAMPISEAL Signature o1rNotiry Publi CPW&COA-00I 151155 REV 3124/14 ^�a* ors-., NANCY i. DiLLAPD Notary Public - State of Florida ; a Commisslon � GG 357241 -' �'crn.°� My Comm. Expires Aug 10, 2023 6c,ced through National Notarf Assn. LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN I hereby authorize Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. and Yovanovich, Coleman & Koester, P.A. (Name of Agent) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in this Application. Signed4iassman S sY_a—� Date: a ?__0 as President of Temple Shalom, Inc. I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. Q:�� C� .S Signature of Applicant Daryl Sissman as President of Temple Shalom, Inc. STATE OF (rL0*_IIA ) COUNTY OF {(ZoLjA EJq_ ) Sworn to and subscribed before me this �� day of 202U by MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:L'N otary P blic CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: and who is personally known to me, A 0> who has produced J as identification :;tY a� NANCY I. DILLARD did take an Oath qcF=: �_ • Notary Public •State of Florida did not take and Oath p Commission k GG 357241 My Comm. Expires Aug 18. 2023 NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: Bonded through National Notary Assn. Florida Statute Section 837.06 - False Official Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of 7o500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term." Co*ler County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.coiliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. r` M iAta : ,ulyfis - TC'll,' /ems_ ��r,�l, w/,i�c 7i.��.. Q K F% /Pc �q 4"U Al fo �rIc v�f 1s1 r� /� n i�iP i t,,; a!A-e vi ey 0 VCj-ls-P .f/a,e ed PA., k1h4 c t c . )e_.j,tt Le 7f *lam T-S '10-5 Cx; 41Ja4 lilk ,' J-I 0714 174e.5 Co ��C SOT �'rf9� Nu I [1p l31-ki P4 r To, r p YYF J. j P wA Fe t''��7}/ I "L' ll Q) tj 1JLI [ i, / 7 4 1 i�[l�` S%i t�i L x c�r>r,4iv jar rh, ) /h,.11tr 0- t - 1 !A +-'6G Disclaimer. Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicants responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 7/24/2018 Page 1 2 of 5 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergo►i.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: 6111" M Date and Time: 2 - S- / 9 9'iVQ. , Assigned Planner: ��� bt c6e1 Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Proj t Information Project Name: PL#: 201Y Property ID #: 3? y2b1�� Current Zoning: Project Address: b'v P� ` � �z City: /VA t 113 State: Cr'L Zip: 3 1 j Applicant: Agent Name: Phone: Agent/Firm Address: C 4Q ./ii�hcr City: a,7+,1111 ;�o; sState:11- Zip: � y/ Property Owner: Please provide the following, if ap licable: z i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: Proposed 1Commercial +Square Footage: - or?0 5 f For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: if the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Lf j,.1 z 1 I j Z c s. Updated 7/24/2018 Page 1 1 of 5 Colfler county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD—Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) Fol OTHER GMPA LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) S15, T49, R26 (see attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 37926120008 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 4630 Pine Ridge Road LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way e SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Temple Shalom PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (forexisting projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 Coflie-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: ❑• Email Applicant Name: Sharon Umpenhour ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Phone: 239-947-1144 Email/Fax: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 Y+ll, s • ail'` '►. �r� • _ _ SUBJECT• ye PROPERTY • Pine Ridge RD yi `o r Or tj AL `'l ... 1r NMcoDD�oo-�o Oo o-opC1P -oe .smWho } 000ffditCRUwOo dfj t Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 4630 PINE Site Zone Parcel No 37926120008 Address RIDGE RD Site City NAPLES *Note 34116 Name / Address TEMPLE SHALOM INC 4630 PINE RIDGE RD City NAPLES State I FL I Zip 34119-4063 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4B15 334300 64 04B15 15 49 26 13.52 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 26 TR 64, 65 & 68,LESS S 45FT OF N 75FT OF TR 64, LESS N 75FT OF TR 65 OR 1529 PG 1519 OR 1578 PG1080 Milla a Area 9 100 Milla a Rates* *Calculations Sub./Condo 334300 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 26 School Other Total Use Code 9 71 - CHURCHES 5.049 6.5084 11.5574 Latest Sales History 2018 Certified Tax Roll Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book -Page Amount 12/12/90 1578-1080 $ 0 05/01/90 1529-1519 $ 0 03/01/89 1 1425-1149 1 $ 71,300 06/01/87 1 1272-612 1 $ 38,000 Land Value $ 893,672 (+) Improved Value $ 5,175,908 (_) Market Value $ 6,069,580 (_) Assessed Value $ 6,069,580 - S h IT bl V I $0 (-) c oo axa e a ue (_) Taxable Value $ 0 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll I� 1 I 1 4 n s 10 r p-11 N 69•-SCD-4 2�79� X J L M U - toe fu C n_ e I 3 � J X t� GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT No zs A SUBDIVISION OF PARTS OF SECTIONS 9, 10.15 & 16, T-49-S,R-26-E. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. <90L G f N' ' �ATF-. E -5 T.4T� s L/A/ / 7-Iv 0. t RESOLUTION NO. 2000-12 RENAME STREET , RECORDED 1/21/2000 ,OR2633 PG 1683-1684 PLAT BOOK 7 PAGE 15117&19 SHEET 1 OF 2 3 3 O• i1 u n p .� - - N / 1 • r! r+ .• a // 6 6 p' -- 0 i I _ n4Z a = 4Q = 07' � Tc 7`1 rt: Td 79 d / 94 9!S "lose 19 - -19 11a _____E BLVD. _ _-- ------ -- --- -- .� --- — — -- — — — —`O' -41 68 69 72 T3 714 TT Sd BZ T3 'fF+6 t0T // /! 113 = IjZ�O soa 53 �S`T + .` '� _S l�iZIs fi`3 +92 47 �rt3(e - - - *vs — — — — — -r- t�="~ — 11 TH. A E_ S.W. — — — — — of ry u it // of ���ri ' �f2. 43 •� .� �`4!� � 4q � SO= a4 91 96 ' 103 !I 11 N 1 IIN A O. If // ..a'" ,N // II /1 ' s Z a 40 V 39 '' 38 37 36 3-S 34 - 3 37- t ; A5's h0 43 s 1 1 8 s 13TH_ALE . S.W. _ — — — — _ _ a — S_89-_40_ 50—r.--- 11 = 119 - Z'1 x at = as 24 - 25 Z 7 IClO = 101 _ I 1f Y rI /f 1! !/ of /1 /f r/ it 11 /1 - 121 `20 s 19 ' $a ' 17 ' 1 -1$ + t♦ = f3 : 32 + t1 a IST a 38 = 101 - 1bZ= " -- —r 15TH A S.W. AD r — - 11 1 d 1 - 2 3 • 4. + s = I: • ?� • . 8 = 9 ' 10' --sea c 1 _Z7 "or. - 123 • 0 -0 -4c S0"W. 5Z80-0------- — — -- ---- — --- -- GREEN BLVD- IF O F 16 13 s! 3 510-- 21 22 GFE.R1-wCE. MOh/UNAF_ M "r- PLAT BOOK 7 PAGE 15 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE Petitions PL20180003708 (GMPA), Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL20180003710 (PUDZ), Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Sharon Umpenhour as Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. State of Florida County of Lee The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 14th day of October, 2019 by Sharon Umpenhour, who is personally known to me �4, (Signature of Not Public) Carin J. Dwyer Printed Name of Notary G:1NIM Procedures/Affidavit Of Compliance - NFA Oct 30 2019.Docx (Notary Seal) i?`t* �.►yq' CARIN J. DWYER MY C0MM1S M # FF 97M EXPIRES: May 14, 2020 Banded Thru Notary PublIc Undarwftrs GradyMinor Civil Engineers a Land Surveyors • Planners o Landscape Architects October 10, 2019 RE: Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Petitions PL20180003708 (GMPA), Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL20180003710 (PUDZ), Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development Dear Sir or Madam: A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Temple Shalom, Inc. (Applicant) will be held on Wednesday, October 30, 2019, 5:30 pm at Temple Shalom, 4630 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34116. Temple Shalom, Inc. has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Rezone. The companion applications propose to create a new subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Element and to rezone the property from E, Estates Zoning District to CFPUD Zoning District. If approved, the applications would allow an additional building of up to 22,000 square feet for various religious and social organization uses to join the existing 302-seat church (religious facility) and increase enrollment for the existing pre-school/day facilities to allow a maximum of 200 children and to provide for accessory uses and structures. The subject property is comprised of approximately 13.5± acres, located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 0.6± miles west of Collier Boulevard in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Sincerely, Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician N Pine Ridge RD J —J m m L Project 0r"" 0 Location a Green BLVD G Project Location Map Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Ph.239-947-1144 Fax.239-947-0375 EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 www.gradyminor.com NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20180003708 (GMPA), Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL20180003710 (PUDZ), Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Temple Shalom, Inc. (Applicant) will be held on: Wednesday, October 30, 2019, 5:30 pm at Temple Shalom, 4630 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34116 Temple Shalom, Inc. has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Rezone. The companion applications propose to create a new subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Element and to rezone the property from E, Estates Zoning District to CFPUD Zoning District. If approved, the applications would allow an additional building of up to 22,000 square feet for various religious and social organization uses to join the existing 302-seat church (religious facility) and increase enrollment for the existing pre-school/day facilities to allow a maximum of 200 children and to provide for accessory uses and structures. The subject property is comprised of approximately 13.5± acres, located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 0.6± miles west of Collier Boulevard in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. o Pine Ridge RD J J m m L Project 0 0 Location Green BLVD The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed to Sharon Umpenhour, Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375. Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA. Petition: PL20180003710 & PL20180003708 Buffer: 1000' 1 Date: 9/23/2019 Site Location: 37926120008 �NAME'I i NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 FOLIO A & T INVESTMENT TEAM LLC 101 25TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120--- 9614 37926520006 ADRIAANSE, MICHAEL JENNIFER ADRIAANSE 4460 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4016 37924440007 AGUILAR, RAFAEL & HILDA 4600 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119---0 36612000006 ALBRETS, BEVERLY J & BILL 4711 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4000 37926080009 ALBRETS, BILLY LEONARD 4711 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--- 8911 37926600007 ALEMAN, SONIA 4540 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37926680001 ANA LYDIA ALEMAN QPRT 4860 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119--- 3912 38399440000 BECTHOLD, CAROL 4785 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4021 37925840004 BENNETT, LORI J 4730 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4022 37924040009 BIHLER, CHRISTINE A 4780 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37923920007 BLANCO, ALEXIE 4530 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37926720000 BOHALL, BLASE E & MARION 4600 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4020 37924240003 BOLANOS, ORLANDO 4451 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37927000004 BOW DEN III, W ILLIAM A MARY-ZOE BOW DEN 4580 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37924320004 BOWEN, PATRICIA D 4950 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116--- 3930 38398440001 BROWN JR, ALAN 140 WEST ST NAPLES, FL 34108---0 37926880005 CADREAU, SAMUEL A & DIANA A 4655 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4062 37926200009 CALDERON, HILDA & MAYKOL G 4461 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4066 37926920004 CALVERT, BRIAN WALLACE 4631 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4062 37926400003 CARR, CHARLES W & CLAUDIA S 4801 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116--- 3927 38399560003 CHIN, LLOYD V & VIRGINIA A 4630 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4020 37924280005 CRAIG, JOHN A HARRIET P CRAIG 4420 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119--4034 36613880005 DELGADO, GLORIA 198 W 50TH ST HIALEAH, FL 33012---0 37926960006 DUNN, JEAN C 4675 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4062 37926240001 EADS, ANTHONY L & MARY C 4925 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116--- 3929 38398320008 EDWARDS, MARK 4641 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37926320002 EVANS, CHRISTINA N 4580 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119---0 36612040008 FAIRHURST, PAUL 4601 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4019 37925640000 FAIRHURST, PAUL G 4601 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4019 37925600008 FERRIS, MICHAEL & COLEEN 4810 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119--- 3912 38399480002 FIELDS OF GREEN LAWN CARE INC 2316 PINE RIDGE RD STR 444 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 37923960009 FIGARES, ALEX R & INGRID 4845 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0 38286840001 FOLCH, LOUISE PO BOX 990084 NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37926840003 GIBSON, MARIAN H 1425 US 19S IMPERIAL COVE 14-B CLEARWATER, FL 33516---0 37925960502 GOJMAN, JORGE & MARY ANN 14 SWEET FERN RETREAT SAVANNAH, GA 31411--- 2949 38399320007 GOMEZ-PINO, LILIAM BEATRIZ EDUARDO PING SANTIESTEBAN 4660 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4020 37924160002 GURSOY, A SINAN 4841 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0 38287720007 GUY, MAURICE & KHAMSY 4650 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4020 37924200001 HAMMER, STEVEN C JOSEPH S HAMMER 4710 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37924000007 HERNANDEZ, ALBERTO 5405 TAYLOR RD STE 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 37927080008 HILBURN, DAVID T& JULIE M 4500 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4003 37926480007 HOLLEY, SHARON L LONNIE D STUBER 4811 TALLOWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5001 38399760007 HOTARANU, CRISTIAN MELANIA C BUDIU HOTARANU 3541 1STAVE SW NAPLES, FL 34117---0 37924360006 HUMOO LLC 1575 PINE RIDGE RD #10 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 37926640009 JONES, BOBBY D 4741 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4000 37926000005 JUSTINIANO, JULIO C PAZ 4771 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37925960007 KAMI L JONES 4741 PINE RIDGE RD EXT NAPLES, FL 34119--4000 37926040007 KINNEY, PETER JAMES LINDA DARLENE KINNEY 4661 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4019 37925720001 KOCSES TR, W ILLIAM J 4460 PINE RIDGE ROAD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37926800001 LEVY, JONATHAN P 4420 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4016 37924520008 LINK, JANET A 4615 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4062 37926280003 LOEWER, DOUGLAS G BEVERLY JEAN LOEWER 4780 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37925920005 MADDRILL, DOUGLAS & NANCY 4920 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0 38398280009 MARKOVICH, BRANDON DAVID 4870 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---0 38399280008 MC ALEAR, DANIEL J & DIANE M 4421 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4015 37925320003 MELHEIM, CHARLES J 4690 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4020 37924120000 MENTZEL, CHRISTOPHER C TAMMY L REITZ 6612 LINDBLOOM LN CHERRY VALLEY, IL 61016--- 9137 37926560008 MEYERS, PATRICIA A 4460 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119--4034 36612840004 NAFDOF 22 LLC 2316 PINE RIDGE RD #453 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 38399400008 NAGHIB, ALI B 4815 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116 --- 3927 38399600002 O'HARA, JAMES L & ROSENDA A 4541 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37925560009 OKEECHOBEE GGE TRUST 4044 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120--- 8971 37926121007 OLIVE, JOHN & JESENIA 4590 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119--4036 36612040105 O'NEAL, OMALLEY & LISA 4725 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37925760003 PELOSI, JAMES J & DIANE 4810 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---0 38399680006 PEPPERS, DANIEL R & KATHERINE 4830 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116--- 3928 38399640004 PEREIRO, CARLOS M & TERESA D 10645 OTTER KEY LN ESTERO, FL 33928 --- 0 37924480009 PIWOWARCZYK, MARK & BRANDY 4781 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4000 37925961006 PRITCHARD, SCOTT 4861 TALLOWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116--- 5001 38399240006 R M PERGOLIZZI REV TRUST 4840 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119--- 3912 38399520001 RCM PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT INC 40 WEBER BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3054 36610040000 RECK, ALYCE ELOISE 4561 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4017 37925520007 SACACIAN, PETRU & CLAUDIA ANA 4791 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4021 37925880006 SARK, JOHN H & JUDIE J 4413 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4015 37925360005 SCHMELZLE, GEORGE C & JULIE A 4811 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119--- 3911 38287900005 SLOVA, ARGON & LULJETA 4510 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37926760002 SMIT, DARIN R 4490 LAKEWOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---0 37925440006 SMIT, DARIN R & DEBORAH S 4490 LAKEWOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---0 37925400004 SMYTHE, JOHN R & LAURIE S 4680 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34110---0 36611960008 SORLING, ANTHONY & KIRSTEN 4490 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119--4034 36612880006 SPARKS, W ENDY 4880 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119--- 3912 38399460006 STEINBACH, KARLA A 4397 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4013 37925200000 STEINBACH, KARLA A 4397 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4013 37925280004 STEINMANN, CLIFF W AMANDA ALLAN 4570 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4018 37924400005 TACKETT, VIRGINIA A PO BOX 953699 LAKE MARY, FL 32795--- 3699 37926161009 TANNASSEE SR, KENNETH R PO BOX 11623 NAPLES, FL 34101---0 37925940001 TAPALIAN, DAVID C PATRICIA TAPALIAN 4740 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4022 37924080001 TEMPLE SHALOM INC 4630 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4063 37926120008 TORRES, VERONICA ANGELICA 4510 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119--4036 36612760003 TRAN, NASH 4631 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116--4019 37925680002 VAN BENSCHOTEN, THOMAS C 4831 TALLOWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---0 38399720005 POList 1000 PL20180003710-PL20180003708.xlsx VILA, MATTHEW S & JENNY L 4530 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119--4036 36612800002 W ILLIG, GEOFFREY A & SARAH L 4745 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37925800002 YOCOM, BEN C & NANCY P PO BOX 111059 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 118 38399360009 YOUNG, AUDREY B & RICKY E 4489 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37925480008 ZERBO, CARL A & HEIDI L 4430 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119--4001 37927160009 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES AREA CIVIC ASSOC PO BOX 990596 NAPLES, FL 34116 POList 1000 PL20180003710-PL20180003708.xlsx NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20180003708 (GMPA), Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL20180003710 (PUDZ), Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development October 30, 2019 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY be 90IViseci*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. NAME: EMAIL: '*p'L U L Q)V_a"�'C'M't ADDRESS: n I— VIA , Olv PHONE:� S UL- NAME: &+ M ADDRESS: } f� �� �/�, f PHONE: rl r NAME:q�� %� y EMAIL: ADDRESS:&/ I /�—,Al <-f-r �E PHONE: f �O �� � Ih�.cet�- NAME: - � A* --,I U /J EMAIL: ADDRESS: (, 97 S �L ' " \ . PHONE: �Ll NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: CDt' j'W7 PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NIM Sign -in Sheet 10-30-2019 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20180003708 (GMPA), Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL20180003710 (PUDZ), Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development October 30, 2019 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***please be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. NAME: ADDRESS: 4,2ev °`` E /2 EMAIL: PHONE: 443 'C:'�—':v ¢ NAME: r r EMAIL: ADDRESS: 1 LZ_ PHONE: 7 9iJ Pi r- L; i 2-P1 L /V'4pl_65 F_L44 NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NIM Sign -in Sheet 10-30-2019 Petitions PL20180003708, Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL2018000371 01 Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) October 30, 2019 Neighborhood Information Meeting GradyMinor Project Team • Debra Antzis, President -Temple Shalom, Inc. (Applicant) • Marc Saperstein, Vice Chair and Project Leader - Jewish Federation Greater Naples • Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., Land Use Attorney - Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. • D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • Michael T. Herrera, P.E., Engineer - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • James M. Banks, PE, Traffic Engineer - JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. • Marco A. Espinar, Environmental Planning/Biologist - Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. • James Knafo, Architect - James Knafo Architect, Inc. 2 0 Alk �,. - 547 ifs � � ` ► .} f. S{ 'e. ' •1 v • T "�yeid 1� r 3 . , q. I r L � � � s • �� '. i { r,_ • �`{`k , I � � i - - - x � y, �."'���� . • � '`' ' �'-0r �r ;-�� cif � d - �� t ' + S � "e � ' 1 _ '� . 1-� � . s �; � 'f. :� ' r ` _ - k � err'. .•^q � Si n i�9 � _ 1 . . . � ;� - _ r ! of � ,# �' • QQ�. r*qa•e •�d �•ry rvi M �Vy -��i t A •��+ 4 � 1r �} •� � •� rw '.flg _,�s_yiy M• � "71�1�!.h�f �Y] �3' r �- - n _ ��s Y�. _ ,.�.. ':-1-� Yi-._ _-_`_I .-. .... �,J .. .. ..., ;;4>��. 4'�-i�.�"!►' i'� �44 ��i �e •�}•- .i .� •; :. . '} - - -r- - r- F. J�r r r�- a �µ� y.. � -L. $` '� '*7. �r,` � r i� •' ``' Y 1 ! •'•', }r,. - :� .+7 ►- y � .tip „ M , 4i -f y - �� • 4 a • _ l y �� .. Z r � . .lI . White Blvd Pine Ridge Rd �, r ` 'r S} .. ~ f p � .. i � � . .. � a - ! • � . • � I- pr - . �Y:. . . -r � f � f � 4 T• � � •� fn— �'r + r� ' r Rt. 'f' '}:•.�6.r.+{�` �•" k� ,jr " i i Aerial Map m 71 PINE RIDGE ROAD Pine Ridge RD Ll Project Information Current Zoning: E, Estates Temple and Related Uses and Facilities Provisional Use (Resolution 90-418) Child Care Center Conditional Use (Resolution 93-290) Proposed Zoning: Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Current Future Land Use Designation: Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict Proposed Future Land Use Designation: Project Acreage: 13.6+/- acres Temple Shalom Center Community Facility Subdistrict 5 Proposed Request Create a new subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Element and to rezone the property from E, Estates Zoning District to CFPUD Zoning District. If approved, the applications would allow an additional building of up to 22,000 square feet for various religious and social organization uses to join the existing 302-seat church (religious facility) and increase enrollment for the existing pre-school/day facilities to allow a maximum of 200 children and to provide for accessory uses and structures. n CFPUD Proposed Uses A. Principal Uses: 1. Religious organizations, including churches, temples and other places of worship; religious instruction, religious philanthropic and religious organizations (SIC 8661) 2. Child day care/pre-school center (Tracts 65 and 68 only) (SIC 8351) 3. Civic, social and fraternal association (religious affiliated only) (SIC 8641) 4. Educational, religious or charitable trusts (SIC 6732) 5. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the County Manager or designee, pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.06 K. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Administrative offices 2. Indoor and outdoor recreational facilities including but not limited to fitness facilities, playgrounds, nature trails, and similar facilities. 3. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the permitted uses within this CFPUD document. 4. Water management facilities to serve the project such as lakes. 5. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos, plazas and picnic areas. 6. Any other accessory and related use that is determined to be comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this CFPUD, as determined by 7 the County Manager or designee, pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.06 K. Prohibited Uses C Prohibited Uses: 1. Soup kitchens 2. Homeless shelters 3. Offender rehabilitation agencies 4. Public welfare offices 5. Self-help organizations for alcoholics 6. Refugee services D. Operational Staindar&,. 1. No outdoor amplified music shall be permitted after 8:00 p.m. 1-1 Proposed Development Standards PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA N/A N/A AVERAGE LOT WIDTH N/A N/A MINIMUM YARDS (External) From Pine Ridge Road ROW 75 ft. 75 ft. From Western PUD Boundary 100 ft. 50 ft. From Eastern PUa Boundary 30 ft. 30 ft. From Southern PUD Boundary 75 ft. 50 ft. (1) From Preserves 25 ft. 10 ft. MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 20 ft. 10 ft. MAXIMUM HEIGHT Zoned 30 ft. 2.0f. Actual 40ft. (2) 25ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA N/A N/A MA IMUM GROSS BUILDING AREA (TRACT 64) 22,000 sq. ft. N/A NOTES: (1) Except 40 ft. for the tarpaulin/shade cover over the outdoor play area, as depicted on the master plan, (2) Not to exceed a maximum of 2 stories t1 Proposed Conceptual Master Plan E,ESTATES RESIDENTIAL MINIMUM 211)' WIDE TYPED 4 PINE RIDGE ROAD LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH3 MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPED' 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE O — — _ d i > o 6' HIGH DECORATIVE J ° ° C9 ~ _ FENCE, EAST OF d �� e 111 = O Uj C] z PRESERVE, To 4 b ° J w n GRASS PARKING EXTEND 100' SOUTH WO 1L {} ❑ 9 �1 PROPERTY II I PROPERTY BOUNDARY BOUNDARY l I MINIMUM 6' WIDE 1111 LANDSCAPE BUFFER GRASS PARKIN BUILDING RESERVATION {SEE AREA NOTE #2} _m•'• \ GRASS O E, ESTATES E, ESTATES _m . PARKING ° — - RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL [:m: I p I _a ° i! m BUILDING y MINMINIMUM 15' "- C) z AREA PARKIN O m ®LANIDSCAPE BUMUMFFR WITH WIDE LAN❑ CAP TYPE8:.:. D I 6 HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE BUFFER WITH 6' > GR - ' HIGH CHAIN LINK I PRE-SCHOOL ; FENCE PARKING ❑ SE ICSYSTEM LEGEND SEPTIC SYSTEM J S rr'rh• 1 i 1 DRIVEWAY/PARKING OUTDOOR ® BUILDING T 4 TRACT65 PLAyAREA T_ RACT65ITRAC �1 MINIMUM 15 WIDE TYPE'B' SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH® E, ESTATES 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE o LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SDP-90-128 - TRACTS 65 & 68) RESIDENTIAL SCALE: 1" = 150' PRESERVE TRACT 64 AND PRESERVE PER SDP-90-128 TRACT 65 & 68 w FN o@ssx" ® DEVIATION ®GradyMinor U.CrW,M w; a.,eaKuue,P,.i TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUP JIp10 wi, - Rrf R4G piyuld Ru�^M.. Ir�Md. sdi3a EXHIBIT C CIr11 En�ineerx Laod 9unrynlx Manners Landuape .irchilecLs MASTER PLAN n� REVISED: 10/24/2019 &.npe %pulp¢ • 214 A-5i.1144 11l"2:N-1 I:,.. 9H6Cia 1 OY 2 1 10 Proposed Conceptual Master Plan Overlay ® MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPED' PINE RIDGE ROAD LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE, EAST OF PRESERVE, TO EXTEND 100, SOUTH 1t II E,ESTATES RESIDENTIAL MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPED a LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 4 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE GRASS PARKING PROPERTY Ilf�l��llll�llll BOUNDARY 1-7-11 MINIMUM 6' WIDE 1 LANDSCAPE BUFFER GRASS PARKING RESERVATION {SEE NOTE #2} �. E, ESTATES,m Q PARKIN RESIDENTIAL [Fk•C. ,_.: r"m• m BUILDING .. m AREA G7 MINIMUM 15' I WIDE TYPE'B' PARKIN T LANDSCAPE .. z BUFFER WITH 6' > I GRASS HIGH CHAIN LINK PARKIN 4 FENCE '- - BUILDING AREA a PRE-SCHOOL SEPTIC SYSTEM SEPTIC SYSTEM LEGEND DRIVEWAYIPARKING OUTDOOR �_j BUILDING TITRAC PLAY AR EA TITRAC SIDEWALK SOP-90-128 - TRACTS 65 & 6B E, ESTATES LANDSCAPE BUFFER � I RESIDENTIAL PRESERVE TRACT 64) AND PRESERVE PER SDP-90-128 TRACT 65 & 66 O O o Z S CIDn °e IVZ 1 O � 0 xw Uj BOUNDARY E,ESTATES RESIDENTIAL m Z to n 1 MINIMUM 15' WIDE TYPE'B' m 4 LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH . 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE MINIMUM 15 WIDE TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE N 0 725' 150' - SCALE: 1" = 150, WHEN PLOTrM A 6.2 k 11 _ ® u (''*H.. dAns.Kw, P.i TEMPLE SHALOM CFPUD DEVIATION ®GradyMinor RWnIe RVa^N�•31uinvinuci an RIn=Ju 3"3, AERIAL WITH MCP OVERLAY [:evil P:n�inerrrc Land P.urve�+org Rannera Landecape Mchllecla DATE AERIAL FLOWN: JAN 2019 nla� SOURCE: COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER IL{Ine tiP�lf�: 2:i4.Wi.114{ • n Y. M1!'d4J11111Jr. f�M IbR MP'tlA� 23R.99a.{;{ga 8HB3w 1 Of 1 11 Conceptual Building Elevation THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES BUILDING PINE RIDGE ROAD VIEW PINE RIDGE ROAD, NAPLES COMPLETION IN FALL 2021 15 R C H I T E C T 12 Conclusion E,ESTATES RESIDENTIAL ` 4 ❑ MINIMUM 2D' WIDE TYPED' MINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPED A PINE RIDGE ROAD LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH &HIGH_ - DECORATIVE FENCE 6' HIGH DECORATIVE ¢ 9 0 FENCE, EAST OF PRESERVE, TO4 I� GRASS PARKING EXTEND 100' SOUTH PROPERTY 1 BOUNDARY MINIMDM 6' WIDE P LANDSCAPE BUFFER GRASS PARKIN O RESERVATION (SEENOTE III - E, ESTATES Vim-. - p PARK NG '-°3— RESIDENTIAL m. p - p1 BUILDING Z - MINIMUM 15' AREA ..... . WI DETYPE'B' 1 PARKIN T _� LANDSCAPE'.'. Oz . BUFFER WITH 8' HIGH CHAIN LINK A I PARKING PRE-SCHOOI FENCE•••• _ _ SEPTIC SYSTEM SE TIC SYSTEM LEGENn — — — — CI DRIVEWAY/PARKING OUTDOOR BUILDING -T RACT 64I TRACT 65— PLAYAREq -TRACT 65ITRACT 68� - SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE BUFFER {SDP-90-128 - TRACTS 65 & 68 e, ESTATES RESIDENTIAL PRESERVE JRACT 64) AND PRESERVE PER SDP-90-128 TRACT 65 & 68 BUILDING AREA >_ x���x 22wo xpZz 4 �Uw�xm Q w W '—PROPERTY BOUNDARY IE, ESTATES RESIDENTIAL z y a MINIMUM 15' WIDE TYPE'B' m LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH ■ 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE I- �J N MINIMUM 15 WIDE TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH® 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE 0 1zs im SCALE: 1" = 150' tx�eu Homo � as x r r # DEVIATION TEMPLE SHALOM CFPU� ❑ ®GradyMinor nuaP Fygb EXHIBIT C <:xsl en�nenrR I.nm enr,� Rannerx fan�capn MchReclx MASTER PLAN REVISED: 10/24/2019 • Thank you — + w 2 13 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Wayne Arnold: All right. Well, good evening everybody. I'm Wayne Arnold and we're going go ahead and try to get the meeting started. It looks like we have a few neighbors and we have a lot of representatives from the temple and the Jewish Federation. I'm Wayne Arnold and here representing the project. It's — we're here for small scale plan amendment and a rezoning for the Temple Shalom property, which, you know, this building obviously is part of what's going to be their campus. Can everybody hear me okay? Speakers: No. Wayne Arnold: No? You can't hear that? Male Speaker 1: [Inaudible] [00:00:28] Wayne Arnold: It's on. [Crosstalk] Wayne Arnold: This better? Male Speaker 1: Yes. Wayne Arnold: Okay. I'll try to do that. So, let me make a few introductions. We have Rabbi Miller, who is standing over here. He's, uh, gracious enough to host us tonight. And we have Debra Antzis from the temple. She's sitting back here. And we have Jane Schiff and Jeffrey, uh, Feld from the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples. And, um, with me tonight, Sharon Umpenhour, she's taping the meeting for us. It's a code requirement. Uh, Jim Banks, sitting next to her, is her traffic engineer. Michael Herrera's here. He's the civil engineer from our office that's doing the, uh, site design work. Rich Yovanovich is our legal counsel, and, um — where's Clay gone? Clay Brooker is here representing the legal counsel for the temple. And then we also have some county representatives here tonight. They're here to monitor this and take notes. And David Weeks is here from long range planning, and Tim Finn from Zoning Department and Jeremy Frantz is here with land development and zoning, I guess — multiple roles tonight. But anyway, so, we're going to give a short presentation and tell you what we're doing with regard to the plan amendment and for the rezoning. I know that some of you — we held a meeting prior to the submittal of our documents and some of you were present for that meeting. And we're going to Page 1 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM go back through and update you on where we are with that process. So, let me find my clicker and I will get started. Maybe I will. Put your [inaudible] [00:01:571 up there, Sharon. There you go. Okay. [inaudible] maybe in reference to that, the location obviously — you're all familiar with the location. The temple property's about 13 and a half acres, and a portion of that's developed. The westernmost portion of the site's about four and half acres and has not been developed and is not part of the original conditional use approval that resulted in the church and the preschool being located here. So, this is a closer image of the campus itself. Obviously, to the right is the — the sanctuary, the temple building that we're in, and the preschool building is the southernmost building. The parking is in the center of the site, and then the westernmost portion of the site is the area that, um, is the larger subject of this amendment. Because it would give rights to this portion of the site that's currently vegetated to allow the Federation and the temple to build a joint building, approximately 22,000 square feet in size, to do sort of the philanthropic aspect of what the Jewish Federation does. And then, also some of the temple functions that, uh, could carry over there. And they host, obviously, special events and Bar Mitzvahs and other activities here that would give them other space as well to utilize on campus. And we think this makes good sense for all that they are doing in conjunction with each other, and their activities that they're currently involved in together. So, today the property is zoned estates. It's part of the Golden Gate area master plan, and we're proposing an amendment to the Golden Gate master plan that would give rights to the temple property to have other religious activities here, including those functions that are conducted by the Federation. And we're also changing the actual zoning of the land from estates to a planned unit development. And the planned unit development allows us to create a master plan for the campus, it allows us to establish development standards for the campus, and more importantly, list permitted uses and possibly prohibited uses that would be permitted on the site. So, the subdistrict request that we're creating is going to authorize the construction of the new, approximately 22,000 square foot building. And it would be for religious and social organization activities associated with those that are conducted by the Jewish Federation, as well as the temple. It would establish that the maximum intensity is 302 seats for the church facility or religious organization facility, which is the Page 2 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM capacity they currently have today. And we're having a slight increase in children from about 180 that they had enrolled last year to a maximum of 200 for the preschool function. They had an original approval for the preschool. They built the preschool building, and then — and increased their enrollment subsequently, so they're about 180 kids last year enrolled on campus. So, we're rounding that number up to 200. So, that, or the — the essence of our request — we're establishing permitted principal uses, which would allow the religious organization — churches, temple, other places of worship — the childcare preschool center, civic, social, fraternal organization, religious affiliated uses, education, religious, or charitable trusts — which is a large part of the fundraising activities that both organizations do — and then any other use that standard language that's comparable, that's, uh, something that we typically have. And then, of course, we establish accessory uses that would be permitted that include the administration offices, the indoor/outdoor recreational activities, and other things like open space and water management that are a part of all of our, uh, submittals. We also are prohibiting certain uses in the project. And we've prohibited soup kitchens, homeless shelters, offender rehabilitation agencies, public welfare offices, self-help organizations for alcoholics, and refuge services, because those are things that the county, and a lot of church -related functions these days — there are carryover activities and we've put these and other — as restrictions in other projects we've worked to make sure that it's understood what you can't have on campus. And then, one of the operational standards we're proposing would be a limitation that no amplified outdoor music permitted after 8p.m. We are establishing our own development standards and we've specifically limited the non -sanctuary type building use and the preschool use to the 22,000 square feet that's identified in your table. We're keeping our zone height at 30 feet, which is the standard that's currently in Golden Gate estates, and establish an actual height of 40 feet, which is, Mr. Yovanovich coined the phrase, "It's kind of the tippy-top number." So, any [inaudible] [00:06:431 above the two-story building that they're proposing for the Federation building would have a maximum height of 40 feet. This is our conceptual master plan that we've developed for the property, and I'll just walk you through a little bit of that. Uh, main access point obviously on Pine Ridge Road is located here where Page 3 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM I'm highlighting on the screen. We're proposing a second access to the site, um, that would service, um, sort of the centerpiece. It's called tract 65 as part of the legal description, and so a new access point would be located here. Uh, we're still talking to the county about what that would be, in terms of right in/right out, left in. The county has not completed our review yet and we're still negotiating that with them. But the principle part — [Male speaker interjection] Wayne Arnold: If I could finish my presentation, I would be happy to take questions. The main building area remains the same for the temple and the preschool. The parking areas remain largely the same. Uh, open space areas on the perimeter remain the same there, and then the — the bigger changes obviously are impacted by development of the four -and -a -half -acre westernmost parcel. We're showing parking areas adjacent to the Pine Ridge Road area. The main building area is highlighted here on the master plan. And the center part of the site: future septic system for the expanded building on that site. And then, we have our preserve area that we've placed along the entire western side of the — the — the community. County staff has reviewed this. They are comfortable with the preserve location in there. Uh, it serves two functions: it serves as a buffer, as well as our required preservation of native trees on the site. This is an aerial overlay showing you the master plan and how it relates to, you know, what's on — on the ground today. And we have a building rendering of the conceptual building for the new — new building that would be shared with the Federation temple on the westernmost tract. And that's about a 22,000 square foot building, and it's obviously in the conceptual stages today and it's, uh, not that far along in the physical design of it, but we have some images and working with our building committee to keep refining that. So, in conclusion — you know, again, we're in for the small scale amendment and the PUD zoning that they're going to establish the requirements to allow us to have the current functions on the side, as well some of those activities I highlighted that are part of the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples. So, with that I'm happy to take questions from the audience and try to answer questions. We have obviously people from both the temple and the Federation here who obviously can answer questions. Yes. David? I'm sorry? David Weeks: Just please remind people to give their name. Wayne Arnold: Oh, sure, and thanks for the reminder. The county staff and the Page 4 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM planning commission would like people to give their name if they don't mind. Or if not, they just want to be able to distinguish if you're a neighbor, or you're on our development team, so when the transcript of this comes out, they know sort of who's talking and who's asking the questions. So, be happy to — question — I'm going to pass the microphone to whoever wants to ask questions, so we can make sure we capture that. So... Douglas Loewer: My name is, uh, Douglas Loewer. I have property directly to the west of the site, and probably am the one that's most impacted by what's going on. Uh, I'm a professional engineer. I'm registered in Florida. I'm also registered in five other states. My background is in sewer water and storm water. I have, uh, got my license in 1980, was registered in Florida in 1983. Uh, I also hold licenses as a wastewater and waterworks, uh, operator and superintendent. All four licenses for waterworks and wastewater works. And I design the — designed, built, and operated the largest septic field system that was ever put in the ground. So, uh, this is my area of expertise, a lot of what's going on here. I have a couple questions to start with. First of all, I'm for the project. The — I've read through about 20% of what Brady Minor put on and, uh, with the county, and I ran into some disturbing stuff. And uh, like to get probably the legal stuff taken care of first, and then get into the design problems. Um. Exhibit F of the Temple Shalom, and CFPD lists the developer commitments. It says, uh — there's a section here that says, `As owner and developer sell off tracts,' the Temple Shalom being the owner and developer, uh, the [inaudible] [00:12:031 and so forth. Uh, I wasn't aware that Temple Shalom was going to be in the process of selling off tracts. I thought that Temple Shalom would be continuing here, and I want them to continue here. They've been a good neighbor. But if they're going to be selling off tracts and we're talking about new people, uh, I'd like to know who the new people are, or what the plan is, so that I know who's going to be moving in. Wayne Arnold: Okay. I'll — I'll be happy to answer your question. This is Wayne Arnold. That is standard PUD monitoring language that the county requires us to put in, because they track these on an annual basis so they can, um, tell how much activity has occurred on site. They want to deal with one entity, so if anything is ever sold, they know that there's still going to be a single entity that they can contact to find out information about this property. That's why that language is there. Page 5 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Douglas Loewer: Uh, it shouldn't be saying `sell off tracts.' Wayne Arnold: I — we use this exact language that the county attorney's office gives us. Douglas Loewer: Well, that's — Wayne Arnold: And — and there's no prohibition on anybody selling their property. So — Douglas Loewer: No, but, uh, with this and the other things that I found through the — through the, uh, Brady Minor submission, um, it certainly appears that they're going to be moving on. Wayne Arnold: I'm not aware of that, but it — there's nothing that would prohibit the — the temple or anybody else from selling their properties, so — anyway. Yeah, some other comments or questions there? Douglas Loewer: Oh yeah. I've got a stack of them. Wayne Arnold: Okay, let's keep moving through it, because other people may also have questions. Douglas Loewer: Number — number two, was, uh, when you look in the traffic, um, study, it says that the — the 22 — thank you — the 22,000 square feet of associated office space, um — I thought the Federation and Temple Shalom were two different agencies. When I met with Ms. Antzis over here, she said that, uh, there was going to be at least [inaudible] [00:14:041 of some sort, and they [inaudible]. Traffic study indicates that uh, uh, Temple Shalom's new building is gonna have associated offices, and then go up higher and say that, uh, um, they don't know what the associated offices are. Uh, I was unaware that there was gonna be such a changeover between the two. I thought these were basically two separate projects on the same site. Wayne Arnold: Well, this is Wayne Arnold again, and the information in the traffic analysis — you — you have to classify a building for what its closest classification is, so Mr. Banks ran traffic numbers based on it being an office. There's no doubt about it: the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples wants to have its own office space in the new building, but it's also going to be a potentially shared space so the temple can also have functions and activities there as well. Douglas Loewer: Are the — is the temple actually gonna have office — offices in the Page 6 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM 22,000 square foot room? Wayne Arnold: I don't know if the temple intends to actually have office space. They have office space in the current building that we're in today. Douglas Loewer: Yes. I didn't know if they were expanding into the building also. Wayne Arnold: The building is still capped at the 22,000 square feet that we expressed in the traffic analysis and our zoning documents. Douglas Loewer: So, that's — we're — we don't — we don't know what the income is gonna come there. Wayne Arnold: I can't predict that future. I mean, if some date in the future, Debra needs to expand office space, that's where it would be a logical place to do it. Douglas Loewer: Um, I read the 2017 brochure put out by the Federation and they draw upon about 8,500 people in Uster Count —in Collier County and about 1,500 people outside of the county. So, they have a — a draw of about 10,000 people that they — they can service. Um, nowhere in there, and nowhere in any of the documentation does it indicate how many people they do service. I was wondering if, uh, uh — we did [inaudible] [00:16:171 last time we were here that it was 100 people would be coming into the — the new building each day, but I — I know that 10,000 people aren't servicing 200 a year — 200 people a year, 500 people a year, 1,000 people a year. Not — because some of those — some that are coming in are coming in on repeated days. Jane Schiff: [inaudible] [00:16:401 Wayne Arnold: Jane, if you're gonna speak, I need you to be on the record. Douglas Loewer: I'm not sure where [inaudible] [00:16:51] Jane Schiff: Okay, uh, Jane Schiff [inaudible] Jewish Federation of Great Naples. Um, we service, I would say about 2,000 of our nearly 10,000 that the compilation study that you were referring to says that there are approximately 10,000, um, between Collier County and [inaudible] County. We — the 100 people a day that you are referring to are what we were expecting, um — are what we were — would expect on a typical day. There will be a dozen days a year where we have 400 or 500. We might want to mont—monetize the building in offseason and make it available to other people who want to rent it for a day or the event. So, we figure probably 15 or 20 days a year Page 7 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM — tops — and would be more than that a day. Douglas Loewer: Okay. Well, the reason I'm bringing — the reason I was asking the question was that in your future directions area, that copy, it says, `It's difficult to project whether the community will grow or shrink,' and that's because 83% of your, uh, the people in the family are 60 years old and older. Jane Schiff: Correct. Douglas Loewer: And uh, you do not have a very good following thereafter. Uh, in 1% in most of the categories: 20 to 30, 30 to 40, 40 to 50. And the reason I think that's important is that I want you all to succeed. I want you to be there for a long time. I don't want to have a change where you have to move out because you don't have enough people to support your operation, and Temple Shalom has to re -rent and we get a — a — a less satisfactory — don't want to call you tenant — but — Wayne Arnold: Neighbor. Douglas Loewer: — with a leased neighbor or whatever you want to call them in there. And uh, I don't — we — when I was talking with Miss Antzis there about a 50 year lease, uh, if you only make it down the line four or five years and you can't support the 22,000 square foot building — that you don't have enough people coming in, and we have to have a new — a new entity move in. You know, I don't want Hertz Rent - a -Car moving in, and having people in and out all the time. Jeffrey Feld: Um, I'm Jeffrey Feld. I'm the CEO of the Federation and I can't make a promise, because 50 years from now, I'm not gonna be here. You're not gonna be here. However, I can tell you, that as the Jewish community is growing, and the services are being utilized in terms of bringing people together, the Jewish community is growing. We're bringing more people together. Um, I don't think is a concern we need to have at all. Douglas Loewer: Okay. In other words, I would just like to see it continued the way it is. Jeffrey Feld: From your mouth, [inaudible] [00:19:68] [laughter] Douglas Loewer: Um, when I tried to break in earlier there, I was trying to comment on the second entrance to the, uh, outside — well, the new one. Um, it's my understanding that, uh, both in Submission 1 and Submission 2, the county has rejected that second, um — that second entrance. Page 8 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Wayne Arnold: Our last submission, they conceded that we would be allowed at least to have a right in, and Mr. Banks is having continued dialogue. We think they're going to — they being the county — are going to allow us to have the access that we — as we have proposed. We don't have that formalized yet, and there will probably be conditions on it, but that's what we're still going to continue to push for, that full second access point. Douglas Loewer: And as far as the access point goes in your study, you said that, uh, there would have to be a — a U-turn put into the median somewhere. Jim Banks: A left turn, yes. Douglas Loewer: Left tuna/U-turn. Obviously, that can't be done at the main entrance. I was wondering how far down you were proposing to make that U- turn? Jim Banks: It's gonna be put at the main entrance. It's gonna be right across, uh, the left turn lane. It's coming in to the Temple Shalom map, so the intersection is symmetrical. Douglas Loewer: So, there's really no need for the other entrance because you're gonna be turning everybody at the same place. The only people you — the only people that would be going out would be people going to the east down Pine Ridge that aren't gonna have go down — change lanes and — what is that, 300 feet? Or less, if you have an access lane, and then make a U-turn into oncoming traffic. Jim Banks: U-turns are just part of the design here for all of them. We do them throughout the county. Douglas Loewer: So, your plan is to make the new one right turn only, and then make a U-turn 300 feet away from that, uh, for the whole project? That's what your plan is? Jim Banks: I'm not sure what you mean by the — for the whole project. Full access for the main road, yes. Essentially, we're gonna put in a left turn lane, to allow people that prefer to exit out at the new site into a U-turn. It doesn't mean they have to. They can still turn a left out at the main entrance, or they can around and do a U-turn at the traffic light. It doesn't mean they have to do it. We're going to put that provision in. It will serve this project and it could serve anyone else that's over to the west of us that — that does not full access on the primary — Douglas Loewer: So — so you think that pulling out of the new entrance, making a right turn, and cutting across — changing lanes to the left, and then Page 9 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Jim Banks Douglas Loewer: making a left getting in, and then getting into the left turn lane to make your U-turn, that that is a safe proposition? Yes. We have — there's multiple locations in Collier County where we — Just because there's multiple locations in Collier County doesn't mean they're safe. Jim Banks: These multiple locations have not proven to be safety issues. We've analyzed this, [inaudible] [00:23:03] analysis of that, and that we determined that it would be safe. It will be — any permit that's issued by the county is conditioned that if an access point is deemed unsafe, it can be removed. So, there is a condition — there will be a condition if it's approved that it can always be removed if it's unsafe. We don't believe it's gonna be unsafe. It's not anything unique. They're — they're typical throughout Collier County and they've been proven to work. Thank you. Wayne Arnold: Thanks Jim. Douglas Loewer: Have you considered putting the main access at the — in the new spot? Jim Banks: No. Wayne Arnold: No, I don't think we've considered that. Douglas Loewer: Okay. Uh. I just pulled a set of documents, uh, off the internet under preserve, allowing the uses. Um, number four says, `Water management and water management structures.' Uh. If I compute the stormwater requirements properly, you're gonna take up the entire preserve area with water management and water management structures. Wayne Arnold: I think if you'll note on our master plan, we have a separate area that's going to be our water management system. What that contemplates is, sometimes you're allowed to dissipate water in a preserve, or you can discharge to it depending on the type of vegetation. That's standard language that we have in almost every PUD that we've worked on. Douglas Loewer: Well, you know, I'm — I'm sorry, but when it comes to standard language, that's when you get in trouble. Wayne Arnold: Well, I can tell you, dealing with Collier County, there's a lot of Page 10 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM standard language we put in a project that may or not be applicable, but that's the way the county operates. I mean — Douglas Loewer: So, it's not your intention to put any water management or water management structures in the preserve? It's simply as an allowable use. You simply have it in here as a, uh — because the planning requires it. Wayne Arnold: Well, I don't know that we would never put in any water management in it. I think Michael Herrera, our design engineer, is still looking at the site plan and doing design. We don't have a water management district permit. Southwater Water Management District ultimately tells us where we discharge and how — how frequently we discharge water from the site. I'm not trying — Douglas Loewer: We're not talking about discharge. We're talking about the preserve areas. Wayne Arnold: Yes, I understand that. And they all function together sometimes, is what I'm trying to say. Douglas Loewer: Well, if you're going to tear down the, uh, preserve areas, to put in water management and water management structures, there's no preserve area left. Wayne Arnold: The county — the preserve area would depict on the plan, as preserve will have to be placed in a conservation easement. Douglas Loewer: Yeah, but you have it as an allowable use. Wayne Arnold: And the county, I'm telling you, does make provisions for you to have some limited water management use of your preserve. And I don't know the answer tonight of whether or not we will be putting any water in that preserve or not. Douglas Loewer: Then why don't you commit to not put any in there tonight? Wayne Arnold: Because I don't know if I can design the site without doing that. We have not done that level of detailed engineering design. Douglas Loewer: We're here for a uh — an informational meeting. Wayne Arnold: This is an informational meeting for the [inaudible] [00:26:10] and zoning — yes. This is a — Douglas Loewer: And the way I understand the code, this is the only one you're gonna Page 11 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM have. And you — and you — is that correct? Wayne Arnold: This is the only required neighborhood information meeting. Douglas Loewer: Okay, and you don't intend to have another one? Wayne Arnold: I don't think we have one scheduled, but, you know, we have had dialogue for the last several months and we're happy to continue dialogue with you, Mr. Loewer. Douglas Loewer: Uh. Well, I think that — I think it's important if you're going to tear down the preserve area for water management. I think that's the important issue. Wayne Arnold: Well, I understand your concern, but the county will not let us remove the native vegetation from the preserve in order to use it for water management. Douglas Loewer: Well, once again, maybe if we had another meeting you could tell us what — how many square feet you were going to put water management in the preserve area, rather than not being able to tell me anything. Wayne Arnold: Well, I don't have that — Richard Yovanovich: At this point — Wayne Arnold: Hey Rich, maybe you want to — Richard Yovanovich: For the record, I'm Rich Yovanovich, I'm the attorney for the property. You're asking for a site development plan of the detail to be done at the rezone level of the project. That's not simply how it's done. You will have an opportunity, if you want to, to review all of the site development and documents [inaudible] [00:27:271 and engineers [inaudible], give your input to Collier County staff that we're ready to do [inaudible]. And I'm required to do it now as part of the PUD process. We are allowed to use preserves as part of the water management. We are not allowed to remove any vegetation to do so, so the characterization that we're going to go in there and destroy those preserves is simply not correct. And we're not going to get into the site development plan level of details tonight. We're here to talk about the uses of the property and what uses, if any on each of the different areas of the property, will not [inaudible] Douglas Loewer: I guess my question for you is, is that a requirement at number four? Is that something that the Collier County requires in every document? Page 12 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Richard Yovanovich: It is a standard condition in every Collier County PUD that we can use preserves as part of the water management system as we go through the same — the detailed site development process. That is a standard condition that is in the use. Wayne Arnold: Thank you, Rich. Douglas Loewer: Well. My understanding of the — I guess it's the PUD, uh, one of the two of them anyway — is that, uh, you can basically shape your zone — what you're requiring in the zoning — for your one little area. It doesn't really have to be, uh, what the commercial's calling for or what the, uh — or what residential's calling for. You basically tailor the — the, uh — the requirements and setbacks and parking and things like that, uh, based upon just something that, uh, that fits. Uh, I noticed that, uh, when you — I figured your parking for the area — you figured it at, uh, one space per 200 square feet. Works out to 110 spaces. But the building has a large assembly area in it with 160 seats in it. Now, my understanding is that when you have an area that has a different use than the rest — that's not office space, you would split it out, figure up the parking on that, and then figure up the rest of the parking on the — on what's — on what's remaining. When I figured that up, I come up with 140 spaces, uh, based upon what the county requires: 1 per 300 and three per seven, uh, for the — for the assembly area. And I could find nowhere where 100-200 was a — was a number other than on this particular design. Now, do you intend to go to treat the, uh — assembly area as office space? Is that what — because that's what you're doing. Wayne Arnold: Well, if I can answer — this is Wayne Arnold. First of all, general office space isn't calculated at 1 per 200. The 1 per 200 is a higher medical office parking ratio, it requires more parking. And the other thing that you didn't mention is that we're going to be sharing parking throughout the entire parking lot for the special events that would occur here, just as the temple would then share in ours when they had a special event. Douglas Loewer: Well, 140 spaces won't — even 1 10 140 spaces will not be enough for special events, so you're going to — you're going to be sharing it anyway. Wayne Arnold: That's exactly what I said. Yes. We intend to share parking. Page 13 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Douglas Loewer: What — what — well, how would you arrive at — oh, you said it was a medical requirement. Wayne Arnold: It's — it's a high parking standard, and it's — furthermore I could argue with a straight face that I don't need any parking for the separate building because it's all part of the religious campus that has parking based on how many fixed seats we have in the sanctuary; three per seven parking spaces. Douglas Loewer: Well, if you think you're accommodating — on any the existing building has, it's — it has 174. Is it — no, needs to have 174. I couldn't count them because so many were grass parking. Wayne Arnold: But I think to the point on the parking, for any church or religious facility that's parked at three seats per seven spaces — three spaces per seven seats, excuse me — the — you know, that doesn't always account for the wedding, or a special religious event, or the High Holiday that they may have. So, the standards are written for the averages and we're comfortable that we have ample parking based on the standard for what we're proposing. Douglas Loewer: And you can assure us that their people won't be parking, uh, in the median and on either side of the shoulders, uh, during the year. Wayne Arnold: I can never assure you of what a private individual may do. Yeah. Douglas Loewer: Because they're — they're — they arrived on the — they were parked all the way down the med—the shoulder last week. I mean — Wayne Arnold: No, I understand your comment. I can't — Douglas Loewer: — you have the traffic situation with people coming out. We got people parked on the, uh — on the — in the median and the shoulders. And — and nobody seems to consider this a problem. Wayne Arnold: Well, I think the one — the one things you can do, like everybody can else do, is you have an issue and you think it's an unsafe condition, you can call the Collier County Sheriff's office and they can come and cite those people for parking in the right of way. I know that doesn't help the immediate situation, but I don't know that I can ever guar —give you that guarantee that nobody's ever going to park on the county right of way. It may not even be anybody related to this — this facility. Douglas Loewer: Describe that to the person that pulls out from the shoulder, and whose car gets hit and the person gets killed. Page 14 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Wayne Arnold: Okay. Mr. Loewer, I understand your — your comment. Douglas Loewer: We'll get back to this. Wayne Arnold: Yeah. Douglas Loewer: You are requesting a deviation. One: parking spaces, uh, with a 70% grass parking. Uh, you — even in the first section, you say that 15% is, uh, normally what off-street parking in the grass is. Um, you don't have 70% up there. Where is the rest of it going to go? Wayne Arnold: This is — Mr. Loewer, this is considered a conceptual masterplan. This is not a detailed engineering construction site plan. Douglas Loewer: We're doing a rezoning. Wayne Arnold: Yes, we are. Douglas Loewer: And you are basing that rezoning on things that you can do within this — this area. I — if we're going to — if we're going to do the rezoning, and then get the permit down the line, that's not how it works. Wayne Arnold: That is exactly how it works. Yes. This is not a construction level permitting exercise. Douglas Loewer: Well, my problem is: who — who's going to be running that building? Richard Yovanovich: Who's running what building? Douglas Loewer: Well, what you're saying is that as long as Temple Shalom rents to the Federation, they can — they can rent that building. But when — when the — if the Federation should fail, the Federation should move out — if Temple Shalom should move out, and somebody wants to move back in there, and you're tailoring the project to them, how is anybody ever going to move into to that — that space? Richard Yovanovich: Well, as you read the list of — sorry, for the record: Rich Yovanovich. If you read the list of permitted uses that can occur on the property, regardless of who the occupant is, whether it's the temple, whether it's the Jewish Federation, the uses are limited to child daycare preschool, which is on tract 65 and 68, which are the two to the east. Page 15 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Douglas Loewer: Well, that's fine. But — Richard Yovanovich: You want me to answer your question? Douglas Loewer: What if Temple Shalom rents to somebody else and they have a daycare that has a fulltime lunch in it? Richard Yovanovich: Well, let — can I finish? Before you — the next use is civic, social, and fraternal associations — religious -affiliated only. Very limited group of potential occupants of the property. Educational, religious, or charitable trusts, limited uses on the property. Religious organizations, including churches, temples, and other places of worship, religious construction. Religious, philanthropic, and religious organizations — a very limited group of people — and any other principle use which is comparable in nature to those uses. So, the universe — uh, people or organizations that can use this property are very small. There's no prohibition from having a daycare that actually feeds its students. Douglas Loewer: Are you going to make them increase the septic field when they do that? Richard Yovanovich: When we get to the level of detail to do that, yes, I'm sure the county is going to say, "How big is your kitchen?" And based upon how big the kitchen is — I'm not an engineer, but I've done enough projects — the county has regulations that say `This is how big your septic tank needs to be.' I'm assuming it's similar to the fact that I have a septic tank at my house. Based upon the square footage and the number of bathrooms, and the number of — I only have one kitchen, but it's theoretically could have more. That is all required by code and the engineering standards for that, which we will meet every one of those standards. We are just simply asking for the right to do those things today. In Collier County, there's a — there is a detailed site development plan process that we go through next where the detailed engineering, including the size of the septic field, will be decided. The number of parking spaces will be decided based upon what we put in the building. Today is not the day that we do that. We do that through a site development plan process, and that's what we're going to do. You're — you are asking us to do something way beyond the detail level that we're at right now for Collier County improvement plans. Douglas Loewer: So, what you're saying is, is everything is a political thing. Page 16 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Richard Yovanovich: No, I never said it's a — actually, zoning is a quasi-judicial thing in Florida, which means that there are very specific standards, that if we meet them, we get them approved. It's not a political thing. Douglas Loewer: Well, I can tell you right now that the amount of area you have there for drainage is not near what you need, and by the time you fix the parking and the drainage and the septic, there's not going to be room for the building. Richard Yovanovich: We'll see. We — we have a different opinion with different professionals. Douglas Loewer: Well, if you all are — you're making an opinion now of what to fit. You have — you say you aren't an engineer — you aren't looking at the numbers, but you're going with what's up there. I can tell you right now that my biggest single concern is that — even Mr. Hernandez says that, uh, it's nine —is that correct? Wayne Arnold: Herrera. Douglas Loewer: Herrera? I'm sorry. I apologize. Uh, anyhow, uh, that we're having 9,000 gallons of a day of sewage being put into the ground. There are three houses there — we've had around 1,000. I think that's something that should be with the rezoning because, uh, that's ultimately going to contaminate the groundwater. Richard Yovanovich: Well, I'm sure that Mr. Herrera will be required to meet the required development standards that exist in the — Douglas Loewer: Now, he was very clear in our last meeting that the only thing he was interested in was the minimum standards and whatever costs the least. I met with him for 20 minutes. Richard Yovanovich: I — I understand, and I don't want to get into a huge, long debate with you tonight about your feelings about Mr. Her —Mr. Herr —got me calling him — Douglas Loewer: Well, he's doing — he's — Richard Yovanovich: Mr. Herrera and what you think will happen — Douglas Loewer: He's doing what he was told. Richard Yovanovich: I will tell you at the end of day, if we can't fit the 22,000 square foot building that we're going to hopefully get approved through the zoning process, we'll have a smaller building. My guess is — an I've Page 17 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM known Michael for a long time — he's got a pretty good idea of what will fit based upon what's on the property and we're willing to go through that process — Douglas Loewer: Well, my concern about the 70% grass is that that changes the stormwater. Richard Yovanovich: And again, we have a very detailed site development plan process that will handle water management. And do you know who should call? Call Matt McClain — Douglas Loewer: I got it. He won't return my call. Richard Yovanovich: Well, I'm sure then call — can get his — his, you know, direct number if you don't have it. Douglas Loewer: I called six people over there since I met with — where's Mr. Mirandas? Is he here? Richard Yovanovich: They've got — they've got David Weeks. You've got Tim Finn. Douglas Loewer: I called — [Crosstalk] Wayne Arnold: You can't talk over each other. Richard Yovanovich: They will be happy to pass along to Mr. McLean that you would like a return call. That's all I can do tonight. So, could — could we move on to not detailed engineering related questions? Talk about what we're asking for on the property. For a person who opened up by saying you want this project to happen on the property, I don't really — I don't really get that feeling, but maybe I'm mismisreading things. Douglas Loewer: If it means you can solve the sewage problem, that's my line of work, okay? If we're going to dump 9,000 gallons in the — in — in the subsoil, and we're not going to treat it, which is what he said, you're — we're going to have contaminated groundwater. Richard Yovanovich: It's going to meet the code requirements. We have to meet the code requirements. Douglas Loewer: Well, here — here — here's the question for you then. Richard Yovanovich: Okay. We'll go all night. Page 18 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Douglas Loewer: You all — the county approves all of this stuff and I will put in my two cents, so you will all be aware of what my concerns are. When it fails — because I have yet to be wrong on one of these in 40 years — and I've gotten many, many letters from towns that have — are going the direction you're going — it will be an apology letter down the line. I want to know who's going to — who's going to fix the contaminated groundwater? The county isn't. You all approve what they did. So, they're going to say, "The county approved it, so we did everything we had to do," and you'll end up with a Love Canal. Or a — or a Dundoff, like in this area, where it was okay to do it in the `60s and `70s, but now nobody's got to spend millions of dollars to clean it up. That water — that groundwater gets contaminated, I can tell you right now, when — when people start pumping the, uh — not only their domestic water — but they're going to pump that up on the sprinkler system and put e. coli right out on the ground. That's what happens when it gets contaminated. Now, who's going to pay for it? Richard Yovanovich: We — we don't agree with your comments, so can we just move on? We'll be here all night. Douglas Loewer: Well, just — I just want to know who's going to pay for it. Richard Yovanovich: Well, I'll worry about when and if that ever happens. Douglas Loewer: Is — is — is this Temple Shalom's problem? Richard Yovanovich: When and if that ever happens, we'll address that scenario. I'm not going to address it tonight. Douglas Loewer: Well, if it's anything like Dundoff, they were 30 years stuck discussing it. I'd like to know who is going — who is going to pay for it? Richard Yovanovich: Well, I'm telling you — Douglas Loewer: Because they're going to contaminate the groundwater. They're going to flood out the people on the other side of the street with their drainage. Richard Yovanovich: Yeah, I think we're done. I think we're done. I'm not going to keep going. I'm not answering the question, because I don't think it's going to happen, and we'll deal with it when and if it ever happens. So, can we move on and let other people speak? Page 19 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Douglas Loewer: Okay. And you're — then you're — then you're saying that I can't speak anymore? Richard Yovanovich: No, I'm — I'm just asking to — no sir. Give him back the mic. Douglas Loewer: That's fine. Richard Yovanovich: Do you have anymore land use related questions? Douglas Loewer: I'll see — when you say it's a judicial issue, I guess that's where you want me to go with it. Richard Yovanovich: Okay. Beverly Loewer: [Inaudible] [00:44:021 affect us. Wayne Arnold: If you're going to speak, Ma'am, I have to have you on the microphone. Sharon? You want to — Beverly Loewer: I said, [inaudible] Richard Yovanovich: State your name. Beverly Loewer: Beverly Loewer. If you have the groundwater — is not controlled, it's going to affect our property. Next, it's going to affect our septic — our well system. Wayne Arnold: Yes. Beverly Loewer: And I'm very concerned about that. Wayne Arnold: And we understand that, and that's why — Beverly Loewer: I don't have the details and the numbers, but I just know I don't want it to affect my property over there. Wayne Arnold: Well, we certainly don't want that either. Beverly Loewer: [Inaudible] awhile. Wayne Arnold: Anybody else have questions? Yes, sir. Sam Cadreau: Good evening. Sam Cadreau, I live directly across the street, uh, 4655 Pine Ridge. Um, I've got a couple of different concerns. Number one, there again with the — the groundwater — the — the Page 20 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Speakers: Sam Cadreau: Speakers: Sam Cadreau: Beverly Loewer: amount of occupancy for the building and you — you all have the luxury of being on city water. We don't. We don't. Right. The temple does. But we don't. Everyone else around here is on private wells. Yes. Sam Cadreau: So, I just want to make sure that everybody understands that. So, everything that comes off, whether even stormwater or drainage from the building, uh, sewage from the building goes into a private septic system for the temple and all the property. Now, my first question is if we were to build the same building on a piece of property to accommodate the building, the proper parking, and all that — that we would have an assembly in this building, how big of a piece of property would we have to have? Now, who can in the county answer that for me? Obviously, it would not be the size of that piece of property. It would be a lot larger. The reason it's getting by as being changed, because you've got a shared parking, and I understand. And a lot of people probably don't realize, but the question is why isn't that whole parking lot paved? Because the size of the property and the size of [inaudible] [00:46:351 water that needs to be retained on that piece of property — that's why that parking lot is not fully paved. Wayne Arnold: Can I — can I interrupt you to — Sam Cadreau: Yes, go ahead. Wayne Arnold: This is Wayne Arnold again. I didn't mean to cut you off, but the county has very specific requirements and actually allows grass parking for churches and other places of assembly because of the infrequent use of some of those parking spaces, and there are standards for that. So, that's why you already have grass parking on the site. It wasn't because we're trying to overdevelop it and we need it. The county actually will make us utilize some of that as impervious area anyway, even if it's grass. Sam Cadreau: Right. And I understand that, but I'm — that's what I'm saying though, that if we were to build this same building on a piece of Page 21 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM property, how large of a piece of property would it have to be to accommodate the building and the proper parking for that building? Wayne Arnold: I don't think we've done that analysis to know a — a specific answer to your question. Sam Cadreau: What you — what is being presented is because we're doing that shared parking. That's a lot. Okay. Wayne Arnold: Yes, sir. And that is — that's — that's part of the — the concept of their campus and that's why it's a good fit for the Federation and the temple to share those facilities. Sam Cadreau: Now, two other — two other concerns. My basic — when I started my first job in high school doing six years of land survey, so I know how to look at a piece of land and I know how to look at deeds and properties. If everybody will look on the screen and look at the yellow line that encompasses the property that the temple owns. Why is that piece of property — that line up there on Pine Ridge Road, which we all legally own to the center of the road, even though there's 75 foot right of way — it jogs down on part of the parking lot and encompasses across the whole piece of property in question that the temple does not even own. I have the deeds right here in my hand that other people own that property. When you make that access, you're making an access across a piece of prior private property, even though it's a right of way, as the county right of way. Wayne Arnold: Can I answer your question? Sam Cadreau: Sure. Wayne Arnold: Because I — I do know the answer to this. Um, the title work that was prepared for this property demonstrates that even though those were under alternate access points, they were given right of way for Pine Ridge expansion, so it actually is under the control of Collier County and will have the ability to access the county right of way. So, it was part of the right of way taking, yes. Sam Cadreau: Okay, so you can right of way even though there is a deed for that property that — that they're — you're crossing? Wayne Arnold: Yes, sir. Sam Cadreau: Okay. All right. Just wanted to clarify that. Um, another major factor Page 22 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM — and I'm going to — I hate to say it, but I'm a — I'm going to throw the traffic engineer under the bus right here. Okay? I spent 25 years with the City of Naples Fire Department. I have worked accidents left and right. I live directly across the street. I know when there's an accident in front of this entrance every time it happens, unless I'm out of town or we're on duty. Okay? Um, to — to dispute your idea of a right turn second access coming out, and like the other gentleman said, having to cross lanes and then make a U-turn up to go back west, it is really pushing the limit for the traffic. If you really want this project, it really needs to be pushed seriously to have to have a traffic light. And I think that this other prior meeting, that members of the church and members of the Federation were 100% behind that, because it's too dangerous. I've seen too many accidents out there. Uh, we have to do a U-turn in the median to get back to our driveway in a road that's doing 50mph, posted speed limit. And they're not doing 50, they're doing 60, okay? It's too dangerous. This project— if you're going deal with this project, you need a traffic light. You need the safety built into this, because it's just way too dangerous. There have been too many accidents out there. I don't know the exact numbers, but I think you know that I can a phone call down to the sheriff's office, because I know [inaudible] [00:50:50] Randolph personally, and I could have that in about 10 minutes. Okay? But this needs to be considered highly before this project even goes. And to go back on also with the county, the church is looking to rezone this property, which is now a zone residential. You're going to go through a process to zone it to multi -use for a church. Understand. But all the answers haven't been given, and all the problems haven't been solved, but yet, if it doesn't pass, then that property's going to be zoned back commercial. Then they're going to be sitting on it. What're they going to do? Wayne Arnold: If — if I just clarify that. If — if this would not be approved, the lands that we're talking about largely — the four and half acres that are undeveloped today will remain zoned estates and would allow only estate zoned uses. They would not allow the church uses on it without going through the same process again. Sam Cadreau: So, that would — okay — let — let — okay, let me clarify. If we go through the rezoning — to get the rezoning to be able to provisional use for church — Page 23 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Wayne Arnold: We're asking for it to be a permitted use, not a provisional use. Sam Cadreau: Okay, permitted. Okay. Wayne Arnold: Yes. Mm-hmm. Sam Cadreau: So, it gets rezoned as that. But then, as the rest of the procedure goes through and the county commissioners do not approve the overall building of the building and the site management and all, is that property still going to be under provisional use, or will it automatically go back to the residential use as well? Wayne Arnold: Well, right now, the portion that we're sitting in today that's been developed for the parking, the childcare, and the sanctuary are all, uh, provisional use, not conditional use. Sam Cadreau: Right. I understand. Wayne Arnold: So, that's how they approved under the Golden Gate master plan. We're asking to rezone the entire campus to a planned unit development to allow this use and the Federation uses on the site consistent with the — the uses that I've gone over and those that Rich read into the record. Sam Cadreau: Okay. Wayne Arnold: So, if we get that approved, that's what we're approved for. Sam Cadreau: Okay. Wayne Arnold: If we don't get that approved, then the temple is left with exactly what is has today. Sam Cadreau: I understand. I understand that whole part. Wayne Arnold: Okay. Sam Cadreau: What I'm understand about the four and a half extra acres that you're looking at — at rezoning from residential to provisional use, if they get changed to provisional use and the whole plan does not go through — the whole plan just tanks — the temple's still going to have their original property — understand — they'll still own the western four and a half acres. But it's residential now. They could turn around and sell it off as residential property and get of that property. So, if it gets rezoned as provisional use, the whole plan tanks and it doesn't go anywhere, is it still going to stay provisional use Page 24 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM property? Or will it revert back to residential at that point? Wayne Arnold: Well — well, the term is planned unit development, not provisional use, just to be clear, but yes, once it's rezoned, the PUD — it is a PUD — it's no longer zoned estates. Sam Cadreau: So, they — they would have to go back and forth — in order to sell it later on, they would have to go back for another rezoning of it back to residential? Wayne Arnold: That is correct. Female Speaker 1: Or we come up with another plan. Sam Cadreau: Okay. Wayne Arnold: Yeah, you would either go through and rezone it or amend this zoning to allow some alternate use. Sam Cadreau: That's why — that's why — I understand what this gentleman was saying about having some answers before we go into looking into rezoning some property, because it's a procedure. You're rezoning this, and then all of a sudden, you can't use it for what you wanted to use it for, being rezoned, so what are you going to do with it? Understand where I'm going? Wayne Arnold: I do, but if they can't use for it what they're intending, it would remain vacant. Sam Cadreau: Right. Right. Wayne Arnold: That's the answer. Female Speaker 1: [Inaudible] [00:54:26] [Phone rings] Wayne Arnold: Jimmy. Sam Cadreau: Okay. Understand. Thank you very much. Wayne Arnold: Okay. Thank you. Anybody else? Ladies? Want to — no? Female Speaker 2: Um, I just agree with him with the traffic thing. I really do. Wayne Arnold: Okay. Noted. Anybody else have a question? Comment? Yes, Page 25 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM ma'am? Female Speaker 3: [Inaudible] [00:54:42] Wayne Arnold: Hang on. One at a time, please. This lady's — Female Speaker 3: They said with the traffic light situation was turned down. Diana Cadreau: I know an officer — my name is Diana Cadreau and I live right across from the temple. [inaudible] in agreement with the project getting through. We're a little concerned with the size of the 22,000 square foot building, as well as the number of individuals that will be using this building and the social functions. I think that's all that we're very concerned about. Um, and what we're also very concerned about the — the entrance and the — and the exits. The one or maybe the proposed second entrance. Um, again, this is a very dangerous area in the road again with the speed. Again, we see multiple accidents as it spans as it now. My thought is if we did change the main entrance and exit to be further down, uh, what are your thoughts on that? Wayne Arnold: Are you suggesting farther to the west for the access point, closer to the second access point we're showing? Diana Cadreau: Yes. Wayne Arnold: I'll — I'll let Jim try to answer that. The county has access space and criteria between driveways, so I'm not sure we have an opportunity to shift both access points farther to the west, but I'll let Jim answer that — try to. Jim Banks: Uh, this is Jim Banks again. I — yeah, we met with the county. There is no option move that full access further to the west. As you can see on the area that's already a full access to the, uh, lowering in front from the existing property, uh, which we can align up with. And there's also another full access further to the west from there. And Collier County has specific, um, access spacing requirements, and currently this doesn't even meet their current standards. So, we certainly could not shift that access any further to the west. We would be in full violation of their intersection separation criteria. Diana Cadreau: How did it initially get approved that — that we're already in violation? Jim Banks: The access points are already there. And this — this access would be Page 26 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM the one that would be considered in violation, so if any access got closed, it would this one right here. Wayne Arnold: He — he's referring to the county median, not the driveway connection to our site. Jim Banks: Yeah. The driveway — yeah — the median opening. You see this existing median opening? This is one does not meet the separation standards for the Temple Shalom full access. So, if one was to be closed, it would be this one right here. That's why we didn't even attempt to line up with — because it would be closed. Diana Cadreau: Okay. Wayne Arnold: Thanks Jim. Anybody else? Before we — yes, ma'am? Janet Lee: Yeah, um, I — Wayne Arnold: You need to be on the microphone if you're going to speak. We have to capture the comments on the record, please. Janet Lee: My concern is how do I cross the street? Female Speaker 2: Name? Janet Lee: My name's Janet Lee. Female Speaker 2: Thank you. Janet Lee: You're welcome. And the thing is, like Sam said, we have had a lot of accidents, just you people coming out. I'm not saying you as in — but there has been. Um, one of the accidents actually, the man got mad because he hit a motorcycle and he was a kid down the street and was upset because he said "He hit my bumper off." That is exactly what he said and I couldn't believe it and the kid's lying in the ditch. Um, the county needs to do — look at the traffic on this road and take into consideration you and everybody else coming in and out. Wayne Arnold: Yes, and they will. This is Wayne Arnold again. They certainly will. That's part of their analysis on looking at our proposed locations to make sure they're going to meet those spacing criteria. Janet Lee: Or reduce the speed. Yeah. We need the speed limit — Wayne Arnold: Yeah. That's something that — Page 27 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Jim Banks: Yes. Wayne Arnold: — that we can't control — the speed, but certainly that's something — Janet Lee: I feel if you drive this every day — Wayne Arnold: I don't drive it every day and I'm sure you do. Yeah, you live here, and I don't. I get that. Janet Lee: It's — it's terrific. It's awful getting out and it's awful getting back into, and I've been here for four years. Wayne Arnold: Understood. Understand your concerns. Beverly Loewer: [Inaudible] [00:59:041 Wayne Arnold: Anybody else have a comment? Anybody else? Beverly Loewer: I said, I'm really pissed [inaudible] all the traffic was backed up [inaudible] get into the parking lot. Do you know what I'm talking about? Last week? Wayne Arnold: I didn't experience it. Debra's back here nodding her head because, you know, she obviously hosted the event here at the temple. So — but understood. Douglas Loewer: I have — I have one further question. Here, uh, you list on the site that gets us into the county that this meeting is going to be — is the only one you're holding for this and the other one you're, uh, processing. Wayne Arnold: That's correct. We're jointly conducting the comp plan meeting and the zoning meeting. That's what this is about. Douglas Loewer: So, I don't have an opportunity at another meeting to discuss these things on site for the other — for the other half of the project where it gets to design, because you've jammed both of them together here. That correct? Wayne Arnold: No, well it makes sense to combine them. The comp plan language and the zoning go hand in hand — Douglas Loewer: So, you then you aren't going to — you aren't going to hear what I have to say about drainage and septic on this one. Page 28 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Wayne Arnold: Well, Mr. Loewer, I — I don't want to get to get into a debate either Douglas Loewer: Then — then when are you going to hear it? Wayne Arnold: We've had dialogue with you and then we've got extensive emails. We're in the process of trying to get additional testing done. Michael's looking at other site design opportunities. We're trying to address all of your concerns. This is just very early in the process for what — Douglas Loewer: Well, then why — then why is this the only informational meeting? Wayne Arnold: What I said is this is the only county -required meeting. The county by nature requires us — Douglas Loewer: Well, I don't have trouble for — for this one — Wayne Arnold: And — and I think as — Douglas Loewer: — and for the one for the design, I don't know how you can list this for that? For the second one. Wayne Arnold: Well, the site design process is not a public process. It's an engineering review, because it's — it's based on all the codes and standards you have to design — Douglas Loewer: So, any concerns anybody has about any of the other items out here don't matter. Wayne Arnold: No, I didn't say that. Douglas Loewer: Because you — because you're having — you're having an informational meeting on basically the site design, uh, before you've done the site design, and you won't even let me talk about it because you're talking about the other project first. Wayne Arnold: Well, and I think this is not the site — Douglas Loewer: I'm going to be standing before the county commissioners. Wayne Arnold: That's okay. Those are public hearings and — Douglas Loewer: Because I don't — I — I think — I think everybody at least gets to talk on — on — on the second issue. Even if you get the rezoning approved, you're saying — yeah, there has to no more informational meetings. Page 29 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Wayne Arnold: The county requires us to have informational meetings as part of the zoning process that we're going through now. They do not require those meetings when we get to the engineering site review. Those are conducted by — Douglas Loewer: So then, why is it listed on both of the two? Wayne Arnold: I'm not sure I understand. Douglas Loewer: On the county document, you've listed this as — you're — you're trying to get two things approved. Wayne Arnold: Yes. A conference in plan amendment and a PUD rezoning. Douglas Loewer: And you're — you're saying that this — this is the only informational meeting with the — where this is going to go on — Wayne Arnold: I said this is the only — Douglas Loewer: — until — until the place gets — until after the place is built. Wayne Arnold: It's — it's the only code -required meeting. Mr. Loewer, we invited you and other neighbors to a very informal meeting before we even submitted application materials. We're happy to continue dialoguing with you or any of the other neighbors that have issues. Douglas Loewer: Yeah, but you just don't want to hear them. Wayne Arnold: This is not — Douglas Loewer: You don't want to hear the issues. Wayne Arnold: Mr. Loewer, this is not the forum, as Mr. Yovanovich mentioned, to deal with site specific development issues. There's another set of codes and regulations that we deal with. Douglas Loewer: Well, very basically, when it fails, I want to know who's responsible. Wayne Arnold: Mr. Loewer, [inaudible] [01:02:431 on the record. Douglas Loewer: I want to know who's responsible. Basically, when it fails, I want to know who's responsible. Who's going to pay for it? Wayne Arnold: Got it. Thank you. If there are no other comments or questions, I'm Page 30 of 31 Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM going to go ahead and close the meeting and appreciate everybody taking their time to come out. Douglas Loewer: It is going to fail. Wayne Arnold: And if you have notice for this meeting, you'll get notice for when we get to public hearings to, um, deal with the planning commission and the board of county commissioners. And that'll be a couple different step process of public hearings, but you'll get notice for that and there will be signs posted on the properties. I'm sure you've seen for other projects around the county, so with that good night and thank you. Male Speaker 1: Thank you. [End of Audio] Duration: 64 minutes Page 31 of 31 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s) NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED SHARON UMPENHOUR WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER 190 AGENT Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician for Q Gradv Minor & Associates. P.A. NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 3800 Via Del Rey STREET OR P.O. BOX Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 27 day of May , 2020, by Sharon Umpenhour, personally known to me of eed as identi fioation and who didMid not take an oath. r CARIN J, DWYER Signature of Not Public ;,s t: IAY COMMISSION # Qublic EXPIRES: 2a ddiw9` Bonded itrru Not nyeivrriters My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Carin J. Dwyer Printed Name of Notary Public \. \ ; ON' . pie/ ®& wd _trp f \\. d'/» . .<a. . \ d IN ..\ .`\ ev NO, : y y y\ :' . 2a.14 .. 0',�.i,\NO i » i .ii . \§ . / COLLIER .GOVERNMENT« > - dQ3299 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL,a §y«: < / ..elwi y:/' \ /\ \�' a \2 : ^~~ t .. .to d \ » \ / \./ 3w2 dk� ) y >< ` 5� \ ©tom / 2 $ Z = m © { NO .EOr «axy» - *, 4. 1"InI i PART OFTHE USA TOO" NETWORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 BCC COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL E SUITE 401 NAPLES FL 34112 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Joe Heynen who on oath says that he serves as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 5/22/2020 Subscribed and sworn to before on May 22, 2020: ._� h�ls_t za 'Y1'�•+_ i;v♦ . GA tx X Notary, State of WI, County of Brown TARA MONOLOCH Notary Public; State of Wisconsin My commission expires: August 6, 2021 Publication Cost: $945 00 Ad No GC10421859 Customer No: 506365 PO#: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that [he Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on June 11, 2020 commencing at 9:00 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber, Third Floor, County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB - ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND MAP SERIES TO ADD THE TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A CHURCH OF UP TO 302 SEATS, A CHILD CARE FACILITY FOR UP TO 200 CHILDREN, AND ON TRACT 64 OF THE GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 26 SUBDIVISION UP TO 22,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMUNITY FACILITY USES, AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 13.5± ACRES IS LOCATED AT 4630 PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL201800037081 yQN Pine Ridge RD o J J m m C 2 171 Project 6 3 Location Green BLVD All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to June 11, 2020, will be read and considered at the public hearing. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCI'Cltcnu)tt-l'articipaii�m((,'(a)llicr('<nill yFl. goN Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman 5/22/20 ruGC10210%01 17.B.c RESOLUTION NO. 2020- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND MAP SERIES TO ADD THE TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A CHURCH OF UP TO 302 SEATS, A CHILD CARE FACILITY FOR UP TO 200 CHILDREN, AND ON TRACT 64 OF THE GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 26 SUBDIVISION UP TO 22,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMUNITY FACILITY USES, AND FURTHERMORE 0 RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 13.5f ACRES IS LOCATED AT 4630 PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20180003708] to CD 0 N T WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. sea., Florida Statutes, the v 0 Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, 04 was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and o WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Temple Shalom Inc., requested an amendment to the Golden Gate Estates Master Plan and Map Series to add the Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2020, the Collier County Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority granted to it by Section 163.3174, F.S., and has recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, on , the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing approved the transmittal of the proposed amendment to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S.; and [19-CMP-01057/1547390/1179 Temple Shalom GMPA / PL20180003708 6/12/20 Page 1 of 2 Words underlined are additions, words through are deletions. Packet Pg. 3211 17.B.c WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) have thirty (30) days to review the proposed amendment and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier County its comments within said thirty (30) days pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment within one hundred and eighty (180) days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, the DEO, within five (5) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted Growth Management Plan Amendment, must notify the County of any deficiencies of the Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), F.S. E 0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY n COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: as a E The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein, for the to purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies N thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendment prior to final adoption. N THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote this day of , 2020. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Burt L. Saunders, Chairman as E Attachment: Exhibit A — Proposed Text Amendment & Map Amendment [19-CMP-01057/1547390/1179 Temple Shalom GMPA / PL20180003708 6/12/20 Q Page 2 of 2 Words underlined are additions, words stme�� are deletions. Packet Pg. 3212 17.B.c EXHIBIT A GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT *** *** *** *** *** Textbreak *** *** *** *** *** TABLE OF CONTENTS *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** A. Goals, Objectives and Policies B. Land Use Designation Description Section *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** C. List of Maps Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** Special Exceptions to Conditional Use in Golden Gate Estates Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** A. GOALS, OJECTIVES AND POLICIES *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** GOAL 1: *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 1.1: *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** Policy 1.1.4: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts an, Subdistricts for: A. ESTATES - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 5. Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** PL20180003708/CP-2019-2 Temple Shulam Community Facility Subdms .l E Page 1 of 4 Packet Pg. 3213 17.B.c 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** Textbreak *** *** *** *** *** A. Estates — Mixed Use District *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** 5. Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict The subdistrict consists of approximately 13.5 acres and is located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 3/4 mile west of Collier Boulevard. It is comprised of Tracts 64 65 and 68 Golden Gate Estates, Unit 26, less right-of-wadpurpose of the subdistrict is to allow for a campus of communityfacility uses as provided for below. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the following_ a. The Subdistrict shall be rezoned to a Cornmunijy Facility Planned Unit Development ,CFPUD), which shall specify permitted uses. b. Allowable uses are church and reli iog us organization services and activities, childcare/pre-school center, religious teaching, and related religious philanthropic and community services and events. c. Tract 64 is limited to non -church and non -school uses and a maximum of 22,000 square feet of floor area. d. A maximum of 302 seats shall be permitted for the church sanctuary facilities. e. Childcare shall be limited to a maximum of 200 children at any one time. f. Homeless shelters and soup kitchens shall be prohibited. g. The CFPUD ordinance shall include development standards and buffers to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** C. LIST OF MAPS Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria in Golden Gate Estates Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict Exbibit A text2 GACDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2019 Cycles and Smalls\2019 Cycle 2 June\CP-19.2 Temple Shalom\Exhibit A dw/12-20-19 PL20180003708/CP-2019-2 Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistnct E 0 s W d Q. E d to CD 0 N Page 2 of 4 Packet Pg. 3214 17.B.c EXHIBIT A PL20180003708/CP-2019-2 Q/ �`P0 TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ADOPTED - XXXX, XXXX 0258001,000 Feet LEGEND (Ord. No. XXXX-X) �� TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICP Im FACILITY SUBDISTRICT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPT. FILE: TEMPLE SHALOM SITE LOCATION MAP DRAFT.MXD _ DATE: JUNE 2020 - E 0 0 t Cl) m CL E d H co on 0 N Packet Pg. 3215 EXHIBIT "A" 17.B.c PETITION PL20180003708 / CP-2019-2 DISTRICT ge Actl,q Center SubtlistW —d In the FNure Land use ,n the GNP) 3e Roatl Ml Use Subdistrict cial YVastem Estates InNI Subdistrict ate Estates Commercial IFce Subdistrict LO U) 0 z J VAND RBILT j BEA H RD O CL ~ -- C � N : PINE RIDGE RD a 0 w z O z H U LO _ — 0 z w W _I W 0 G.G. PKWY �O Cf) Z z J Z) RADIC _. uN — N DAVIS BLVD N F O 0 0.5 1 2 R26E URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES FUTURE LAND USE MAP O IMMOKALEE RD GOLDEN GATE BLVD rN BLVD 0\ J 00 Temple Shalom w Community Facility Subdistrict 0 J O z m z Z) O U 3 RATTLES AKE H � Miles R27E INTERSTATE-75 URBAN GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP ADOPTED- SEPTEMBER24,2019 (O No-2019-25) AMENDED-XXXX Ord,, No. XXX MOCK RD R28E R29E Packet Pg. 3216 17.B.d iNaITICS. t PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 BCC COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E 700 NAPLES, FL 34112 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared said legal clerk who on oath says that he/she serves as Legal Clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Published: 06/24/2020 Subscribed and sworn to before on June 24, 2020: Notary, State of WI, County of Brown TARA MONDLOCII Notary Public. State of Wisconsin My commission expires August 6, 2021 Publication Cost: $560.00 Ad No: 0004245541 Customer No: 1303804 PO #: # of Affidavits) This is not an invoice NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on July 14th, 2020 commencing at 9:00 a.m., in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber, Third Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE NO. 89.05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND MAP SERIES TO ADD THE TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILI- TY SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A CHURCH OF UP TO 302 SEATS, A CHILD CARE FACILITY FOR UP TO 200 CHIL- DREN, AND ON TRACT 64 OF THE GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 26 SUBDIVISION UP TO 22,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMUNITY FACILITY USES, AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANS- MITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CON- SISTING OF 13.5m ACRES IS LOCATED AT 4630 PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL201800037061 All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Cop- ies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for in- spection at the GMD Department, Zoning Division, Comprehen- sive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions per- taining to the documents should be directed to the Comprehen- sive Planning Section of the GMD Department, Zoning Division. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office irior to July 14th, 2020 will be read and considered at the pub- c hearing. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the oppor- tunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in per- son, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to par- ticipate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is frosted on the County website which Is6 days before the meet - ig through the link Provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For addition- al information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarice at 252-2526 or email to BCC_VirtualMeetings®colliercountyfl.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. It you are a person with a disability who needs any accommoda- tion in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, locat- ed at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BURT L SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMP- TROLLER By: Ann Jennejohn Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Pub Date: June 24, 2020 #4245541 E O R t Cn W CL H to a) O N Packet Pg. 3217 17.B.d Public Notices Public Notices NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on July 14th, 2020 commencing at 9:00 a.m., in the $yard of County Commissioners Chamber, Third Floor, Copier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE NO. 89.05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND MAP SERIES TO ADD THE TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILI- TY SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A CHURCH OF UP TO 302 SEATS, A CHILD CARE FACILITY FOR UP TO 200 CHIL- DREN, AND ON TRACT 64 OF THE GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 26 SUBDIVISION UP TO 22,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMUNITY FACILITY USES, AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANS- MITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CON- SISTING OF 13.53 ACRES 15 LOCATED AT 4630 PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20180003708] All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Cop- ies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for in- spection at the GNID Department, Zoning Division, Comprehen- sive Pla n ning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions per- taWng to the documents shou€d be directed to the Comprehen- sive Planning Section of the GMD Department, Zoning Division. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to July 14th, 2020 will be read and considered at the pub- lic hearing. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the oppor- tunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in per- son, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to par- ticipate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meet- ing through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov. individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For add&on- al information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at 252-2526 or email to BCC_VirtualMeetings@colliercountyfl.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disabilitypwho needs any accommoda- t+an in order to participate in this roceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, locat- ed at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Napies, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at feast two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners 0 ice. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BURT L. SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K, KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMP- TROLLER By: Ann Jennejohn Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Pub Date: June 24, 2020 *4245541 NAPLESNEWS.COM I WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 2020 1 19D co 0 0 N m 0 0 N C d E d y a1 Q 06 Q C) U M c O E s t� r Q Packet Pg. 3218 17.B.e Emails of Support Date of Last Name, First letter/ or # Name date received Email Address Organization Comments 1 Bowden, Bill 5/12/2020 4580 11th Ave SW Temple Shalom good neighbors CEO B'nai B'rith Youth Community and Greater Naples 2 Grossman, Matthew 6/2/2020 Organization (BBYO) Community Support - benefit to local Jewish andy.karpman@gm Community and Greater Naples ail.com 3 Karpman, Andy & Di 6/2/2020 Community Bd. Member Jewish Federation of Greater mel.hsfa@smail.co Naples & member of Support - benefit the entire m 4 Lickhalter, Merlin 6/2/2020 Temple Shalom Greater Naples Community Support - benefit to local Jewish Community and Greater Naples 5 Rabin, Jack 6/2/2020 iack.rabin@att.net Community Support - benefit to local Jewish Community and Greater Naples 6 Rabin, Susan 6/2/2020 Member of Temple Community Community and Greater Naples 7 Saperstein, Marc 6/2/2020 mis0821@aol.com Community Support -1FGN supports so much amseigel@gmail.co of the cultural life of our m 8 Siegel, Arthur 6/2/2020 community President & CEO Support the Jewish Federation of 975 Imperial Golf Holocaust Museum & Greater Naples (JFGN) to build its Course Blvd. Ste. Cohen Education new home on Temple Shalom's 9 Suarez, Susan 6/2/2020 Susan@hmcec.org 108 Center campus Support - benefit to local Jewish 1789 Mandarin Chabad Naplesw Community and Greater Naples 10 Zalklos, Rabbi Fishel 6/2/2020 Road Community Center Community Support - enhance and enrich alshbeck(cDgmail.co Jewish life and also serves non- m 11 Becker, Alvin 6/3/2020 Jewish community Support - benefit to local Jewish rbialek@iewishnapl Community and Greater Naples es.org 12 Bialek, Renee' 6/3/2020 Community Support - benefit to local Jewish rosiebogo@gmail.c Community and Greater Naples om 13 Bogo, Rosalee 6/3/2020 Community hwcohen@gmail.co Support - benefit all Greater m 14 Cohen, Harvey 6/3/2020 Naples and Collier County Support - benefit to local Jewish psych ickaren@iclou Community and Greater Naples 15 Deutsch, Karen 6/3/2020 d.com Community W 0 0 N L O O. CL 3 N 4- 0 U) L d d E O R t co CD a E d H c d E t v R Q Packet Pg. 3219 17.B.e Emails of Support # 16 Last Name, First Name Feld, Jeffrey & Susan Date of letter/ or date received 6/3/2020 Email jfeld@lewishnaples. Address 2500 Vanderbilt Beach Road #2201 Organization President/CEO of Jewish Federation Comments Support - benefit to local Jewish Community and Greater Naples Community org 17 Filler, Paula 6/3/2020 Paula pfiller@email. 12449 Lockford Lane Support - benefit to local Jewish Community and Greater Naples Community com 18 Garfield, Josh 6/3/2020 1�;arfield@me.com Support - benefit to local Jewish Community and Greater Naples Community 19 Greenstein, Lenore 6/3/2020 lenoresue@comcas Support - benefit to local Jewish Community and Greater Naples Community t.net 20 Hager, Thomas and Susan 6/3/2020 susan.k.hager@gma Support - benefit to local Jewish Community and Greater Naples Community il.com 21 Kahn, Nancy 6/3/2020 dearnancvkahn@g 1854 Winding Oaks Way member of WCA Support - benefit to local Jewish Community and Greater Naples Community mail.com 22 Katz, Bobbie 6/3/2020 gbkatz5804@aol.co 5804 Cinznano Ct Support - benefit Jewish Community and Greater Naples m 23 Kosloff, Toby 6/3/2020 tobvkosloff901@g Support - benefit to focal Jewish Community and Greater Naples Community mail.com 24 Lerner, Elliot 6/3/2020 edlcpa@comcast.ne 313 Steerforth Ct Support -JFGN supports so much of the cultural life of our community t 25 Nizin, Les 6/3/2020 mcanaplespresident Men's Cultural Alliance of Greater Naples (MCA) Support - JFGN umbrella organziation to many focal civic organizations -great benefits @gmail.com 26 Pino, Mr. & Mrs, Steve 6/3/2020 sievepharm63@vah member of Temple Support - benefit to local Jewish Community and Greater Naples Community uo.com 27 Pittelman, Joel 6/3/2020 jpittelman@icloud.c 6001 Pelican Bay Blvd. #506 Member of JFGN Support - benefit to local Jewish Community and Greater Naples Community om 28 Satz, Jamie 6/3/2020 satz@aol.com Support - benefit to local Jewish Community and Greater Naples Community 29 Schwartz, Betty 6/3/2020 bettvofnaples@gm Support - benefit to local Jewish Community and Greater Naples Community ail.com 30 Sissman, Daryl 6/3/2020 dsissman@gmail.co President of Temple Shalom Support - benefit to local Jewish Community and Greater Naples Community m W rn 0 N L O O. CL 3 N 4- 0 U) L d d E O t N aD a E d H c d E t R Q Packet Pg. 3220 17.B.e Emails of Support Date of Last Name, First letter/ or # Name date received Email Address Organization Comments Support -Jewish community is 1nsobol99@gmail.c lom growing in Collier County and 31 Sobol, Michael & Arlene 6/3/2020 JFGN is in need of new facility President of Womens Support -benefit to local Jewish esoffer0921@comc Cultural Alliance Community and Greater Naples ist.net 32 Soffer, Elaine F. 6/3/2020 3899 Valentia Way (WCA) Community Support -JFGN has outgrown its current facilities and needs a new home to continue to provide programs and services to 33 Suden, Mr. & Mrs. 6/3/2020 Iisudebn@aol.com Treasurer of WCA citizens of SW FL. member of Temple Support - beneficial for Temple 34 Wasserman, Leslie 6/3/2020 leshbr@aol.com and JFGN and JFGN Support - benefit to local Jewish javbweiss47@email Community and Greater Naples .com 35 Weiss, Jay & Susan 6/3/2020 180 7th Ave. S Community Support -JFGN has outgrown its current facilities and needs a new home to continue to 5851 Bromelia provide programs and services to 36 Zalasky, Jeff 6/3/2020 ialaskv@smail.com Court citizens of SW FL. Support -JFGN supports so much of the cultural life of our 37 Bendes, Lea 6/4/2020 edbeb@aol.com community Support - benefit to local Jewish ITiichaelfnaples@g Community and Greater Naples mail.com 38 Feldman, Michael 6/4/2020 Community Support - benefit to local Jewish �aschmelzle@email. Community and Greater Naples com 39 Schmelzle, Julie 6/4/2020 Community E 0 t a� E m W 0 0 N L 0 0. 0_ 3 U) 4- 0 U) L d d E 0 R t to CD a E 0 I— c 0 t U R Q Packet Pg. 3221 17.B.e Bill and MaryZoe Bowden 4580 111h Ave. SW Naples, FI 34116 To Whom it May Concern, 5/12/2020 My wife and I live on the street immediately south of Temple Shalom, a few houses east of the property and across the street. Having lived here for the past 5 years we can't think of anything negative or un-neighborly that has occurred with Temple Shalom. In fact, one of our friends o who has abutting property with Temple told me he has no issue, that he is fine with the Cn proposed land development. "They have been good neighbors". a E aD My father-in-law has been highly involved in the Catholic -Jewish dialogue for many years and we have attended many Kristallnacht services. As a Roman Catholic I support the development c of the facility for the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples as brothers and sisters, together in faith with God. Sincerely, Bill Bowden Packet Pg. 3222 BRa j June 2, 2020 Dear Members of the Collier County Planning Commission, BBYO opr. In OO V @BBYDINSIDER in I am pleased to submit a letter of support to the Collier County Planning Commission representing the B'nai B'rith Youth Organization (BBYO) on behalf of the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples and Temple Shalom as they seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's campus. The proposed project represents the commitment of these two institutions to the kind of partnership and collaboration necessary to build strong community. For almost a decade, BBYO has been a beneficiary of this partnership as we seek to reach and inspire Jewish teens in Collier County. Each year BBYO brings together over 70 teens who engage in leadership development programs, community service initiatives and ritual activities that bring them closer to their Jewish faith. Both the Jewish Federation and Temple Shalom have generously nurtured our program, providing financial and volunteer support. We are thrilled that they have designated activity space for us as part of their proposed campus. As BBYO's global CEO based in Washington, DC, I offer this letter of support enthusiastically and personally. Through visits to Naples over the years, I have gotten to know many of the leaders involved in this project. They represent some of the finest people I know who now serve as role models to many of the young people who come through BBYO's program. I know that the incredible campus they are proposing represents so much of what they stand for as leaders, community builders and citizens of Collier County. As honored as I am to have BBYO hosted on this campus, I am just as proud that the individuals responsible for this project are influencing the lives of our young people. Thank you for considering this proposed rezoning. By accepting this request, you will allow two extraordinary partners to establish a home base that will not only benefit the young lives BBYO seeks to inspire, but that Naples community at -large. Sincerely, Matthew Grossman Chief Executive Officer E 0 Cn as a E as W 0 N Packet Pg. 3223 17.B.e From: marc saperstein To: Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Fwd: Golden Gate Master Plan Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:20:30 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Andy Karpman <andy.karpman gmail.com> Subject: Golden Gate Master Plan Date: June 2, 2020 at 6:14:50 PM EDT To: Karl. Fry&colliercountyfl.gov Cc: mis0821 &aol.com Dear Sir: We strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Please note the following Temple Shalom has been a positive asset to the Greater Naples community and a good neighbor for over 30 years. The temple serves 780 member families and has a well -regarded and much needed community pre-school that primarily serves the non-Jewish community. It has offered the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples, which has very complementary activities and membership, the opportunity to join them on its campus sharing expanded parking and facilities. Temple Shalom has owned the vacant parcel for 30 years with anticipation for future growth of services to provide for the growing number of Jewish families in our community. During Hurricane Irma, Temple opened its doors to its neighbors for food, safety and shelter further demonstrating its community citizenship. We hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Andy & Di Karpman North Naples E 0 0 Cn a� a E m co 0 0 N Packet Pg. !2 17.B.e Dear Members of the Planning Commission, I am writing in support of Temple Shalom's application to change the Golden Gate Master Plan on its property to allow the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to build its new home on the western portion of Temple Shalom's campus. The JFGN is a non-profit umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County. representing over 2500 members. Our activities are complementary with Temple Shalom and Its current approved usage, and both enhance and enrich our community's quality of life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs. We provide more than $600,000 in grants annually to primarily local organizations, including some that serve the non-Jewish community like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. We regularly partner with other local religious communities in support of programs like n the Jewish -Catholic dialogue, and we run the annual "Shop with the Sheriff" program to provide E Christmas gifts to lower income children. I respectfully request that Collier County grant approval of this project that will benefit the entire N Greater Naples Community. Thank you for your consideration. Merlin Lickhalter, FAIA, FACHA Board Member, Jewish Federation of Greater Naples and Member Temple Shalom Packet Pg. 3225 17.B.e Karl. Frya colliercountyfl,gov Mr. Karl Fry c/o Collier County Planning Commission Dear Mr. Fry; Temple Shalom has been active in social justice activities over its past 30 plus years in the greater Naples community. Its caring 780 member families and clergy have provided food to this community, and safety and shelter during Hurricane Irma though the use of its facilities and its 2 building. Among those facilities are its pre-school program that primarily services the non-Jewish Cn community. a E as The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples has an opportunity to join us on our campus that includes a vacant parcel of land we have owned over the past 30 years and would enable us to c continue to provide complimentary services through our shared membership. CN It is our fondest hope that Collier County will grant approval to this joint project as it will benefit both the Jewish and the Greater Naples community. Thank you for cooperation and consideration. Respectfully, Jack Rabin, Member of the Board of Trustees Packet Pg. 3226 17.B.e Karl. Fry ancolliercountyfl.gov Mr. Karl Fry c/o Collier County Planning Commission Dear Mr. Fry: I have lived in Collier County for five years and appreciate all the services offered by the community. Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples have both added to my positive life and activities here in Naples, and I have seen how both have contributed greatly to Collier County. is During Hurricane Irma, the Temple opened its doors to its neighbors by providing food, Cn safety and shelter at a critical time demonstrating its concern for the community and the a people living in Collier County. Temple Shalom has contributed to the Greater Naples E community in many other ways for over 30 years. W Temple Shalom runs a much needed and highly regarded community pre-school that N primarily serves the non-Jewish community. The Temple also serves 780 member families. Temple Shalom has owned the vacant parcel of land on its campus for over 30 years and has anticipated future growth in services for the growing number of Jewish families in our community. To accomplish this plan, it has offered the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples the opportunity to join them on its campus sharing facilities and parking. Jewish Federation has very complementary activities and membership. I sincerely hope that Collier County will approve this project. I believe the project will greatly benefit the Greater Naples community as well as the local Jewish Community. Thank you for your consideration and approval for this. Sincerely, Susan Rabin Temple Member Packet Pg. 3227 17.B.e FaulknerSue From: Wayne Arnold <WArnold@gradyminor.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:05 PM To: FaulknerSue Cc: Sharon Umpenhour; Richard Yovanovich Subject: Temple Shalom Letters of Support Attachments: BBYO Support to CCPC.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sue, below are two emails that were sent to CCPC members, and attached is a letter that was emailed to the CCPC members. I will attempt to obtain copies of the other emails that have been sent. Wayne From: Marc Saperstein <mis0821@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 5:10 PM Subject: Support for Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples efforts to change the Golden Gate Master Plan for Temple Shalom campus To: Members of the Collier County Planning Commission. Arthur Seigel is the President of Chabad of Naples. He requested this email letter of support be forwarded to the members of the Collier County Planning Commission. Thank you for your consideration. From: Arthur Seigel <amseige1(d)gmai1.corn> Subject: Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Date: June 2, 2020 at 4:56:58 PM EDT To: mes0821(a),aol.com, Feld Jeffrey Jeffrey <JfeldCa)-iewishnaples.org> Hi Marc, As one of the leaders of our Jewish Community, I fully support the plans to rezone the Temple Shalom land to accommodate an independent home for the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples. The Federation supports so much of the cultural life of our community in addition to unifying the represented congregations. It would be a very unfortunate loss of opportunity otherwise. Please forward my comments to the interested parties. a� a E m W 0 0 N `o Q. a 3 0 a� a� E 0 t CO aD a E as c m E a Packet Pg. 3228 17.B.e EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Planning Commission Members: The Holocaust Museum & Cohen Education Center strongly supports the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN) to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. • The JFGN is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County representing over 2500 members. • Its activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and its current approved usage, and enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of this community. • It is community asset that provides over $600,000 in grants annually to primarily local organizations, including some that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community, like the Holocaust Museum & Cohen Education Center. The Holocaust Museum uses these funds to educate thousands of Collier County school children and adults every year about the dangers of bigotry, hatred and violence. • It partners with other religious communities locally in programs like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue and runs the local "Shop with the Sheriff' program to provide Christmas gifts to lower income children. We hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. SU4a4'11Su wenk Susan L. Suarez, MBA, CFRE President and CEO Holocaust Museum & Cohen Education Center 975 Imperial Golf Course Blvd. Suite 108 Naples FL 34110 239-263-9200 x203 office 239-784-4521 cell susan@hmcec.org www.HMCEC.or� Thank you for including the Holocaust Museum in your will or estate plans :011+ 1111 CI RTIffcAtI RES EXCELLENCE n nn O' O �.I I 1 JM�KI vw trip .:i, Holocaust Museum & Cohen Education Center E 0 0 aD a E a� 0 N Packet Pg. 3229 17.B.e CC) Dear Collier County Planning Commission, THE ALEX & C A R D I. GLASSMAN CHABAD NAPLES JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER I am writing this letter in strong support of the efforts of the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. As the rabbi and director of the Chabad of Naples organization, I have had the privilege of collaborating with the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples over the past 16 years. The Federation is a critical organization in the Naples Jewish community and greater Naples community, and their services benefit thousands. As the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County, they directly represent over 2500 members and their activities enrich the quality of life for so many in our community. Chabad of Naples is just one of the many organizations that benefits from the over $600,000 in grants that the Jewish Federation distributes annually to primarily local organizations. Their support allows us to continue offering critical services in the areas of educational, spiritual and social life to our constituents, It is my belief that the Jewish Federation's activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and its current approved usage. Allowing the Federation to build an enhanced facility on the Temple Shalom's campus will only enhance their ability to provide educational, humanitarian and social services to the Naples community. I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerel Rabbi Fish�Za/los,,�& E 0 Chabad Naples Community Center • 1789 Mandarin Road • Naples, Florida 34102 T: 239-262-4474 E: info@chabadnaples.com W: www.chabadnaples.com Packet Pg. 3230 17.B.e FaulknerSue From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: FYI BellowsRay Wednesday, June 03, 2020 5:28 PM FinnTimothy FaulknerSue FW: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples ---Golden Gate Master Plan Follow up Flagged E 0 Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Co�er County Exceeding expectations, every day! TO us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://cioo.al/eX*vgT. From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 20201:59 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples ---Golden Gate Master Plan I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. M"k/ Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Alvin Becker <alshbeck@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 8:59 PM To: sheapr1948@gmail.com; Karlfry@colliercountyfl.gov; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountvfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <jschmitt@comcast.net>; pdearborn@lohnrwood.com; HomiakKaren <Karen. Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>; eastmath@coIlierschools.com Subject: Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples ---Golden Gate Master Plan Packet Pg. 3231 17.B.e EXTERNAL EMAIL This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I am writing in support of the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan that will permit the Federation to build its new home on the Temple's campus The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples' mission is to enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting the charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of the Jewish community. It also serves the non-Jewish community like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum and grants over $600,000 annually to primarily local organizations. Its activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and both organizations would benefit from the Federation's proximity to the Temple as would the Greater Naples community. For the benefit of the entire Collier County, we respectfully request the Planning Commission grant this project approval.. o Thank you for your consideration. Cnn a� a E m W 0 0 N n Packet Pg. 3232 17.B.e From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Fwd: Emailed sent Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:28:07 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Renee Bialek <rbialekQewishnaples.or0> Subject: Emailed sent Date: June 3, 2020 at 3:01:50 PM EDT To: "mjs0821 @aol.com" <mjs0821 &aol.com> Cc: Jeffrey Feld <ifeld &ewishnaples.org> I sent the below from my personal email address. Dear Commissioner, I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (the "Jewish Federation") to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. The Jewish Federation is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County representing over 2500 members. The Jewish Federation will greatly enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of this community. The Jewish Federation is community asset that provides over $600,000 in grants annually to primarily local organizations, including some that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community, like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Renee' Bialek E 0 Packet Pg. ;TJ 17.B.e EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Members of the Collier County Planning Commission, i would like to extend my strong support to the efforts of Temple Shalom and The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to receive the approval of a change in the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property. With this change, the Jewish Federation would be allowed to build it's new home on Temple Shalom's property. The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples represents over 2500 members who live in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County. By working together with Temple Shalom when needed, Jewish life will be enhanced and enriched as they both support charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of our community. The Jewish Federation provides over $600,000 in grants annually to local organizations that serve the Jewish and non Jewish community. Two examples are The Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum and Cohen Education o Center. The Catholic Jewish Dialogue program of the Federation partners with other religious communities locally. The annual program "Shop With the Sheriff' provides Christmas gifts to lower income children. The Federation is a Cnn community building organization. a E If the Planning commission will grant the approval of this project, it is my belief the Jewish Community and the Greater Naples community will both benefit. 0 N Thank you for your consideration of this request, and best of luck to you on your future endeavors to better our community. o Yours truly, Rosalee Bogo Packet Pg. 3234 17.B.e EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I write to thank you for your service to our growing and dynamic community of Naples. As a Resident of Naples, and a Board member of the Jewish Federation of Collier County I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the JFGN to seek approved changes in the Golden Gate Master Plan on the Temple's property to allow for the building of a new home for the Jewish Federation on my Temple's campus. The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples, by various previous names, has, for decades, been the 'central address' for the Jewish residents of Naples when seeking resources, services or ways of giving and volunteering. The JFGN, a charitable organization, provide over $600,000 in grants including those to local school programs, Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. The JFGN partners with other religious organizations and congregations throughout Collier County to stand shoulder to shoulder on our faith -based missions. Again, I thank you for your leadership and hope you will see the wisdom of granting approval to this project which, both near and long term, will benefit all of Greater Naples and Collier County. E I wish you health and safety in these challenging times, Harvey Cohen 2 Cn a2 a E m Packet Pg. 3235 17.B.e EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Planning Commission Members, I am writing to advise you of my very strong support for the efforts between Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples seeking approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan of Temple Shalom's property that will permit the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to build it's new home on the campus of Temple Shalom. The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community, and offers a myriad of services and programs to the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island, and Lower Lee County which represents over 2500 members. The JFGN offers activities that are highly complementary to those of Temple Shalom and its current approved usage, and as such, follow similar and complimentary missions of enhancing and enriching the quality of Jewish life through the support of charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs throughout this community. A campus atmosphere would certainly enhance communication and program sustainability. The JFGN is a vital and important asset to this community that provides over $600,000 annually in grants to primarily - local organizations, some of which serve both our Jewish and non-Jewish community, like The Naples Senior Center, the o Holocaust Museum and our Jewish Pre -School centers. In addition, we also partner with multi religious communities locally in the Jewish -Catholic Dialogue Program, and running the local, highly popular and successful "Shop with the 4) Sheriff" program providing Christmas gifts to lower income children. a I sincerely hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples Community as well. co Thank you for your Consideration to this very important matter, Karen Deutsch o 0 N n Sent from my Wad a � Packet Pg. 3236 17.B.e From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Fwd: Support for Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples request regarding Golden Gate Master Plan Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:26:57 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Jeffrey Feld <jfeld c,jewishna�les.orcl> Subject: Support for Temple Shalom/Jewish Federation of Greater Naples request regarding Golden Gate Master Plan E Date: June 3, 2020 at 2:30:40 PM EDT To: "shea rg 1948(a ama� il.com" <sheaprl 948&amait com>, v "karlfr&comcast net" <karlfry&comcast.net>, a "P winfryer &colliergov net" <edwinfryer ancolliergov net>, E "ischmitt ancomcast net" <jschmitt@comcast.net>, 'Pdearborn,aQohnrwood com" <pdearbornCc>>,johnrwood.com>, "karenhomiak&colliergov.net" <karenhomiak&colliergov.net>, N "eastmath(2ccllierschools.com" <eastmathCc Wlierschools.com> Collier County Planning Commission: My wife, Susan, and I strongly support and endorse the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's Campus. As you can see, I serve as the President/CEO of the Jewish Federation. Our Federation serves as the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and even Lower Lee County. Our activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom. In fact, we already collaborate on a multitude of programs to meet the needs of our community. Federation's primary mission is to enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian, and social service needs of our community. We do this, in some cases, through direct service and in other cases by providing allocations to organizations such as Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum so that they may be able to provide their services, as well. In addition, our Federation is involved with creating good and good will in the overall community. We do this through a variety of programs that include the Catholic -Jewish Dialogue, Shop with a Sheriff (working directly hand -in -hand with the Collier County Sheriff's Office), work with the Evangelical Pastors of Southwest Florida and more. All of our activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and its current approved usage. Again, my wife and I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval. By doing so, this will provide great benefits not only to the local Jewish community; however, but to the Greater Naples community as well! Thank you for your consideration. Jeffrey Packet Pg. 3237 17.B.e Jeffrey D. Feld President/CEO f; 1#%.Jv isle FedcraIi011 OFGPFArt 211500VVaa/annderbilt Beach Road, #2201 Naples, FL 34109 (239) 263-4205 Cell: (901) 299-6438 JFeld P.jewishnaples.org www.jewishnaples.ore E 0 Packet Pg. 3238 17.B.e EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. June 3, 2020 Dear Member of the Collier County Planning Commission: My husband and I are full time residents of Collier County. We sincerely appreciate your time and effort on the projects which come before the Planning Commission. With the enormous growth in Collier County we understand that your role is very time consuming and demanding. I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan. The proposed change would allow Jewish Federation to build a new home on the property owned by Temple Shalom. We believe that by sharing the same campus, the synergies created will enable both organizations to increase our positive contributions for all Collier county residents and expand what we already do 0 for the cultural, educational and humanitarian needs of our residents. Cn Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN) is a not -for -profit charitable organization which has more than a 20 year a track record in Naples. JFGN provides cultural, educational and humanitarian programs for Naples and the larger Collier E County community. • Jewish Federation of Greater Naples conducts programs and initiatives which complement those of W N Temple Shalom. • Temple Shalom current planning commission approved usage is to enhance and enrich the quality of Q Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, and humanitarian and social service needs of our 3 community. c • Jewish Federation of Greater Naples provides over $600,000 in grants annually to primarily local ;n organizations that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community. Examples of the organizations we support include: Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. • JFGN partners with other local religious Congregations to jointly sponsor and conduct programs which 2 fight bigotry and racism and promote religious tolerance. An example is Jewish -Catholic dialogue. CO • Annually JFGN provides a grant to local charitable organizations which address human needs. Recently a our humanitarian awards include grants to such organizations as: Bedz for Kids and Laces of Love. E • JFGN sponsors a program "Shop with the Sheriff" which provides Christmas gifts to lower income children and helps build positive relationships between the Collier County Sheriff's Department and children at risk. �a We hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish a Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Paula Filler 12449 Lockford Lane Naples, FL 34120 PaulaPFiIler@gmail.com 973-493-6977 Packet Pg. 3239 17.B.e From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Fwd: In support of Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to Golden Gate Master Plan Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:25:06 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Joshua Garfield <iaarfield aame.com> Subject: In support of Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to Golden Gate Master Plan Date: June 3, 2020 at 1:08:49 PM EDT To: Karl. Frya colliercountyfl.gov Cc: m0s0821 &aol.com, dfidel(2naplestemple.org To the Collier County Planning Commission: I am writing to you in strong support of the efforts brought forth by Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples in seeking approval to change the Golden Gate Master Plan in relation to Temple Shalom's property to allow for the Jewish Federation of build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Below are points of consideration: * Temple Shalom has been a part of the community serving as an asset for over 30 years. * There are currently 780 members and families that congregate in worship and learning. * Temple Shalom has a well -regarded pre-school that serves the entire community, not just those of the jewish faith. * Offered the Jewish Federation of Grater Naples the opportunity to join on its campus by sharing facilities and expanded parking for its activities and members. * Temple Shalom has opened its doors to the neighbors in times of need for food, safety, and shelter such as seen during Hurricane Irma demonstrating the efforts made toward community and citizenship in Collier County. * Temple Shalom has owned the vacant parcel for 30 years in anticipation of future of services to provide for the growing number of Jewish families in our community. I'm hopeful that Collier County will grant approval for this project as it benefits not only the Jewish Community, but all of Greater Naples. Thanks you for your consideration, Josh Garfield E 0 0 Cn a� a E a� W 0 N Packet Pg. 3240 17.B.e From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:23 PM To: BellowsRay<Ray.Bel lows@colliercountyfLgov> Subject: FW: Jewish Federaton New Home I do not know who the planner is so please process this as typical. Ma -kl Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. O t From: Lenore Greenstein <lenoresue@comcast.net> Cl) a� Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:19 PM a To: sheapr11948@gmail.com; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark m <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; Joseph Schmitt <jschmitt@comcast.net>; pdearborn@iohnwood.net; HomiakKaren <I<aren.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>: eastmath@colliers.com; KarlFry <Karl.Frv@colliercountvfl.gov>; mLOB 21@ao cocom N Subject: Jewish Federaton New Home L 0 Q Q EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. 0 L d d Jewish Federation to the CC Planning Commission. E 0 Cn I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom'sproperty and E allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Here are must a few imprtant points: ❑ The JFGN is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and a Lower Lee County representing over 2500 members. ❑ Its activities are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and Its current approved usage, and enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of this community. ❑ It is community asset that provides over $600,000 in grants annually to primarily local organizations, including some that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community, like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. ❑ It partners with other religious communities locally in programs like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue and runs the local "Shop with the Sheriff' program to provide Christmas gifts to lower income children. Packet Pg. 3241 17.B.e I sincerely hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community,but the Greater Naples community as well. I Thank you for your kind consideration to this most important matter. Sincerely yours, Lenore Greenstein Sent from my Whone E 0 Packet Pg. 3242 17.B.e From: marc saoerstein To: Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Fwd: Proposed change to Golden Gate Master Plan Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 5:06:50 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Susan Hager <ciusan.k.hagerno gmail.com> Subject: Proposed change to Golden Gate Master Plan Date: June 3, 2020 at 4:33:57 PM EDT To: sheapr1948&gmai1.com Cc: m4s0821 &aol.com Dear Mr. Shea, We are writing to request that the Collier County Planning Commission approve a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan to permit the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to build its new facility on Temple Shalom's campus. This collaboration will strengthen the positive impact that both Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation already have on the Greater Naples Community. For example, during Hurricane Irma, Temple Shalom opened its doors to its neighbors for food, safety and shelter. It's preschool primarily serves the non-Jewish community. The Jewish Federation is home to a significant array of services that address community needs. This approval will also mean opportunities for sharing expanded parking and facilities for programs and events offered by both organizations. We urge your approval of this proposal. Sincerely, Susan and Thomas Hager E 0 0 Cn a� a E as W 0 N Packet Pg. 3243 17.B.e FaulknerSue From: Bel IowsRay Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 3:34 PM To: FaulknerSue; FinnTimothy Subject: FW: In favor of rezoning of Temple Shalom property FYI Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https:Hgoo.gi/eXjvgT. -----Original Message ----- From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 2:33 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: In favor of rezoning of Temple Shalom property Mark Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. -----Original Message ----- From: Nancy Kahn <dearnancykahn@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 6:04 PM To: Kahn Nancy <dearnancykahn@gmail.com> Subject: In favor of rezoning of Temple Shalom property EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Planning Commission members: This letter of support is in favor of the Re -Zoning of the Temple Shalom property in order that the Jewish Federation of Great Naples will be able to build their new home there. Cn a� a E m co 0 0 N L 0 Q a 3 U) 4- 0 U) as a E 0 t co a2 a E m as E �a a Packet Pg. 3244 17.B.e I belong to the Women's Cultural Alliance, an affinity group of the Federation. We run many cultural, educational, social, and philanthropic activities. Finding space to hold our group meetings is always a challenge. Having meeting space within the Federation Building would be a huge help for our over 1600 members. The Federation provides programming and grants to many local organizations, including both Jewish and non-Jewish communities. I hope you will look favorably on this request. Thank you for your consideration. Nancy Kahn 1854 Winding Oaks Way Naples FL 34109 E 0 co t Cn a� a E m co 0 N 7 Packet Pg. 3245 17.B.e EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. To Whom It may Concern: I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build it's new home on Temple Shalom's campus. My reasons are as follows: Temple Shalom has been a positive asset to the Greater Naples community and a good neighbor for over 30 years During Hurricane Irma, Temple opened its doors to it neighbors for food, safety and shelter further demonstrating it community citizenship Temple Shalom has owned the vacant [parcel for 30 years with anticipation for future growth to provide for the growing number of Jewish families in our community I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community but the Greater Naples community as well. E Thank you for your consideration, Bobbie Katz Cn 5804 Cinznano Court aD Naples, Fl. 34119 a E m co 0 N 7 Packet Pg. 3246 17.B.e From: marc saperstein To: Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Fwd: RE -ZONING OF TEMPLE SHALOM PROPERTY Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 5:18:02 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Toby Kosloff <tobykosloff01 nnmail cn� -i> Subject: RE -ZONING OF TEMPLE SHALOM PROPERTY Date: June 3, 2020 at 4:42:17 PM EDT To: sheapr1948&gmail.com, edwinfryerl o gmail.com, markstrain&colliergov.net, ischmitt@comcast.net, karenhomiak&colliergov.net, pdearbornna 'ohnrwood.com, eastmath@collierschools.com, Karl.Fry@colliercounty To The Collier County Planning Commission - I am writing in support of amending the Golden Gate Master Plan to allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's Campus. I am a full-time resident of Naples and have lived here for the past 13 years. Federation enriches Jewish life in Greater Naples and also provides monetary grants to primarily local organizations like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. Both of these valued organizations serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community. In addition Federation participates locally in programs like the Jewish -Catholic Dialogue and "Shop With a Sheriff' to help children in need at Christmas time. Many of the activities and services provided by Federation are aligned with those of Temple Shalom. The population of Naples keeps growing and a new home for Federation will benefit not only the local Jewish Community but also the Greater Naples community of all denominations. I hope that Collier County will grant approval for the project. Thank you for your consideration. Toby Kosloff 15290 Burnaby Drive Naples, FL 34110 E 0 0 Cn a� a E a� c� 0 N Packet Pg. 3247 17.B.e From: marc saperstein To: Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Fwd: Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:23:58 PM Begin forwarded message: From: "Elliot Lerner" <edlcpaRcomcast.nei> Subject: Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Date: June 3, 2020 at 9:30:30 AM EDT To: <Karl.Fry&colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: "'mare saperstein"' <mjs821 grinail.com> Dear Commissioner Fry, As you are no doubt aware, the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples ("JFGN") is seeking a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan which would allow the construction of a building that will better serve its needs. That building would rest on property owned by Temple Shalom, located on the eastern portion of Pine Ridge Road. JFGN is a 2,500-member not -for -profit organization which serves the needs of the Jewish community of Collier County and southern Lee County, bringing humanitarian and social service support to those in need through grants to other qualified local organizations. Some of those organizations serve the non-Jewish community as well, such as the Naples Senior Center. In addition, JFGN serves as a grant agency, similar to United Way, to support the activities of other organizations in greater Collier County which are focused on charitable and educational activities which enhance and enrich the Jewish community and the community -at -large in our area. To that end, JFGN's annual grant allocations historically exceed $600,000. In the interest of the people of our community who are selflessly served by JFGN, it is respectfully requested that you, and the Planning Commission as a whole, approve JFGN's application to modify the aforementioned Master Plan. With kindest regards, Elliot D. Lerner 313 Steerforth Court Naples, FL 34110 (239)221-3145 (603)494-9062 (Mobile) edlcpaPcomcast.net E 0 Packet Pg. ;;, 17.B.e EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Members of the Collier County Planning Commission: I understand that the Planning Commission will be considering on June 11, 2020, an application to re -zone the Temple Shalom property, (This requires a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan) in order to allow, and permit the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to build a new home to accommodate the many activities of both the Federation, the Temple, as well as other community groups that may wish to use the facility. The JFGN, is an umbrella organization, for the Men's Cultural Alliance of Greater Naples, commonly referred to as the MCA. Under the leadership of the JFGN, the MCA, became a reality seven years ago, and now has over 750.members, from Naples, Marco Island, and the the lower Lee County. E Many of our members, are members of Temple Shalom and the Mca, uses the facilities of the Temple, in order to—°� accommodate some of our, events in which there are 300, or more in attendance. Cn a� a In addition the Federation is a wonderful, supportive partner to many local civic organizations. E The community at large, as well as the members of the Mca, and the Federation, would greatly benefit if the Federation �0- would be permitted to build its' new facility on the Temples campus. 0 N I thank you, for your kind consideration, personally, and on behalf of the Mca's 750 plus members. 77 Les Nizin President of the Mca. Packet Pg. 3249 17.B.e EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. We strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. • Temple Shalom has been a positive asset to the Greater Naples community and a good neighbor for over 30 years. • It serves 780 member families and has a well -regarded and much needed community pre-school that primarily serves the non-Jewish community. • It has offered the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples, which has very complementary activities and membership, the opportunity to join them on its campus sharing expanded parking and facilities. • During Hurricane Irma, Temple opened its doors to its neighbors for food, safety and shelter further demonstrating its community citizenship. • Temple Shalom has owned the vacant parcel for 30 years with anticipation for future growth of services to provide for the growing number of Jewish families in our community. E 0 We hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples M community as well. Cl) a� Thank you for your consideration. E am F_ Sincerely W Mr and Mrs Stephen Pino c Members of Temple Shalom Packet Pg. 3250 17.B.e EXTERNAL EMAI i This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Chairman and Members: I'm certain you have, or will hear from many people about the numerous benefits and services the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples offers the Collier County community. Federation members are rightly proud of their contributions to the improvements they make. As a member of the Federation's Community Relations Council I can report that we work daily to promote relations with other community organizations, religious institutions and charitable groups to advance the lives and hopes of all people. While many people both enjoy and benefit from the Jewish Federation and Temple Shalom, that cannot be the sole determination for your approval of the master plan amendment. The Planning Commission's role, by State law, requires your attention to how the land is to be developed. You are charged with assuring that a master plan makes clear the community's preferences for the uses to which the land is to be put and provides a framework for consistency and predictability for your decisions. To quote State Statutes: The sections of the comprehensive plan containing the principles and strategies, generally provided as goals, E objectives, and policies, shall describe how the local government's programs, activities, and land development regulations will be initiated, modified, or continued to implement the comprehensive plan in a consistent CO manner ... The plan shall establish meaningful and predictable standards for the use and development of land aD and provide meaningful guidelines for the content of more detailed land development and use regulations. E (163.3177 FS, Emphasis add) The intent of this statute is that a master plan is to make consistent and predictable the future uses the community seeks to have c the land developed. Years ago, Temple Shalom developed one of their 3 parcels and have used it in accordance with the CN community's preferences and its zoning laws ever since. The proposed change to the Master Plan requests an extension of essentially the same use of the two adjacent parcels as the Temple has always put to the first parcel. I can think of a no more o consistent and predictable use than what is being proposed. The consistency and predictability of the plan could not be better a 3 served than with this request. N 0 1 urge the Planning Commission to approve the change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and to permit the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. E Respectfully, .0 t Joel Pittelman 0 a E 6001 Pelican Bay Blvd. #506 m H c Naples, FL 34108 t R Q Packet Pg. 3251 cl- 17.B.e I write to you in hopes that you will see the merits in granting approval to change the Golden Gate Master Plan to allow for the building of the Jewish Federation's new home on the Temple Shalom's campus. • This change would not only serve the Jewish community but the Greater Naples community as well. • It is an organization that provides over $600,000.00 in grants annually to local organizations - that include both Jewish and Non -Jewish causes. • It partners with other religious communities locally - like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue and runs the local "Shop with the Sheriff programs to provide gifts for lower income children. • The Jewish Federation oversees the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County which includes over 2500 members It's activities compliment Temple Shalom and it's current approved usage and it enhances the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of this community. I sincerely appreciate your time and effort in reviewing this matter and I hope that you will grant this project approval. It will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community but the Greater Naples Community as well. Thank you, Jamie Satz Jam i3154(5-),aol.com 609.402.2201 E 0 Packet Pg. 3252 17.B.e June 3, 2020 Dear Sir, The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN) and Temple Shalom are seeking approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow the JFGN to build a much -needed facility on Temple Shalom's campus. I sincerely hope that this change will be approved as it will be beneficial to bothTemple Shalom and the JFGN. Over the years, the JFGN has grown to over 2500 members and serves a vital function in the lives of its members, who include members of Temple Shalom. Having a home in this location o will benefit everyone involved. Cn Since moving to the Naples area over 16 years ago, I have been involved with the Jewish Federation as an active volunteer in several capacities. This organization provides over $600,000 annually to primarily local organizations that serve both Jewish and non-Jewish residents. It is through my volunteer work that I have truly felt myself to be a part of the greater Naples community. The Federation cooperates with many community organizations to provide c support to feed those in need, supply Senior services, support education and many other CN philanthropic groups. The Community Relations Council of the Federation yearly makes cash awards to outstanding non-profit groups serving the community (Human Needs Award) and the o Stand Up for Justice educator award. a a Having a permanent home in such a perfect location, will greatly enhance the ability of the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to fulfill its mission of improving the quality of life in our community. Your support for the needed change to the Master Plan will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely Yours, Betty Schwartz Packet Pg. 3253 17.B.e Good afternoon, My name is Daryl Sissman, I am the President of Temple Shalom. I am writing to you today to strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. Temple Shalom has been in the current location for over 30 years and has enjoyed very good relationship in our community. Temple Shalom serves over 780 member families. We have offered the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples the opportunity to join us on our campus. The two organizations share members and has very complimentary activities. The expectation is the the two organizations will be able to share parking and facilities in the future. Temple Shalom on only serves the Jewish community but the non-Jewish Community as well. The building served as an emergency shelter during Hurricane Irma and opened the doors to the neighborhood for food, safety and shelter. Temple Shalom preschool is highly regarded and serves primarily a non-Jewish population. I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the o Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. a E a) Daryl Sissman President of Temple Shalom W 0 N Packet Pg. 3254 17.B.e Arlene and I are legal residents of Florida, and have owned in Naples for 25 years. We strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. We are on the Board of Directors of the Jewish Federation as well as members of Temple Shalom. Both organizations provide many cultural, educational, civic and social events in this area. The Jewish community is growing in Collier County and as such is in need of a new facility to house these types of events. We hope you will support the effort to utilize the parcel of land adjacent to Temple Shalom for the new Federation building. Thank you for your efforts on behalf of Collier County. Michael & Arlene Sobol E 0 Cn a� a E a� W 0 N n Packet Pg. 3255 17.B.e Subject: Collier County Planning Commission June 11 meeting, Letter in support of GoldenGate Master Plan for Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Collier country FXTFRNAI_ EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Elaine Soffer 3899 Valentia Way Naples, FI 34119 June 3, 2020 E 0 Dear Collier County Planning Commission Members, Cn a I enthusiastically give my full support to the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of E Greater (JFGN) to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. o N The JFGN is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island, and Lower L Lee County representing over 2500 members. Q 3 Its activities are highly complementary with those of Temple Shalom and Its current approved usage and enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian, and social service needs of this community. As the President of the Women's Cultural Alliance (WCA), a JFGN affinity group, and it is entirely run o by volunteers. WCA is both non -partisan and non-sectarian and welcomes women of all faiths. The approval of a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan to allow the JFGN build its new home on the O Temple Shalom campus would mean a significant and positive change to the types and numbers of E programs available on a regular basis to this group of women who share similar interests to participate in cultural, educational and social events. a� As a community asset, the JFGN provides over $600,000 in grants annually to primarily focal E organizations, including some that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community, like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. a It partners with other religious communities locally in programs like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue and runs the local "Shop with the Sheriff' program to provide Christmas gifts to lower -income children. I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Elaine F. Soffer Packet Pg. 3256 17.B.e From: marc saperstein To: Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Fwd: Jewish Federation new home needed Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 7:39:44 PM Another one Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: bsuden@aol.com Date: June 3, 2020 at 7:31:29 PM EDT To: "mjs821@gmai1.com" <mjs821@gmai1.com> Subject: Fwd: Jewish Federation new home needed Reply -To: bsuden@aol.com Marc, This is what I sent to the planning commission. Barbara -----Original Message ----- To: sheaprl948@gmail.com <sheapr1948@gmail. com>; karlfry@colliercountyfl.gov <karlfry@colliercountyfl.gov>; edwinfryer@colliergov. net <edwi nfryer@col liergov. net>; markstrain@colliergov.net <markstrain @coil iergov. net>; jschmitt@comcast.net <jschmitt@comcast.net> Sent: Wed, Jun 3, 2020 7:28 pm Subject: Jewish Federation new home needed My husband and I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom's property and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. For the past 7 years, I have been treasurer of the Women's Cultural Alliance, which is an arm of the Jewish Federation. It is a wonderful organization that has helped with enriching the lives of women, both Jewish and non-Jewish, in this community through the many activities it offers. WCA also gives financially to charitable causes in Naples and is very well thought of. We definitely need space to run our programs as we have found rental spaces here are very difficult to find or extremely expensive. Being next to Temple Shalom, who has worked with us on many occasions would be such a benefit for us. By allowing this change, we would be able to continue our wonderful work and make this community an even better place to live. E 0 Packet Pg. TLI 17.B.e Sincerely, Barbara Suden E 0 Cn a� a E m co 0 0 N L 0 Q Q 0 0 L d d E 0 Co 0 Q E d rt+ 0 0 E ci Q Packet Pg. 3258 17.B.e > Hello Gentlemen, > I am writing you to support the rezoning of Temple Shalom's property to include Jewish Federation of Greater Naples on its campus. > l am an active member of both the Temple and JFGN.Many of our programs overlap.For example as the co-chair of Catholic-JewishDialogue we depend on Temple Shalom to hold many of our events, such as Kristallnacht which had over 700 attendees last season. > I hope that Collier county will approve the rezoning which will be beneficial for the Temple and Federation. Thank you for your time in reading this email. > Leslie Wasserman E 0 co t Cn a2 a E m W 0 0 N 7 Packet Pg. 3259 17.B.e From: marc saperstein To: Sharon Umi)enhour Subject: Fwd: Re -Zoning of Temple Shalom property Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 3:26:30 PM Begin forwarded message: From: <iaybweiss47&amail.corri> Subject: FW: Re -Zoning of Temple Shalom property Date: June 3, 2020 at 1:48:54 PM EDT To: "'marc saperstein"' <mjs821 &amail.com> Here is what wed sent From: J3-ybweiss47(@gmail.com <Laybweiss47(@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 1:46 PM To: sheapr1948C@gmail.com; Karl.Fry(@colliercountyfl.gov.: edwinfryer1@gmail.co; markstrain(@colliergov.net; ischmitt@comcast.net; pdearborn(@iohnrwood com; karenhomiak(@colliergov.net; eastmath(@collierschools.com Subject: Re -Zoning of Temple Shalom property Dear Collier County Planning Commission Members: As members of the Jewish community, we are involved in an effort to build a building to be known as The Jewish Federation of Collier County (JFCC) which would be located on property owned by Temple Shalom. In order to accomplish that we are seeking your support and approval, to make an alteration to the Golden Gate Master Plan . The Jewish Federation JFCC) is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County representing over 2500 members. Its activities are highly aligned with Temple Shalom and its and its current approved usage. Our goal is to enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by supporting charitable, Packet Pg. 3260 17.B.e educational, humanitarian and social service needs of the community The Jewish Federation of Collier County (JFCC) is a community asset that provides over $600,000.00 in grants to primarily local organizations, including several that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community such as the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum as well as partnering with other religious communities locally like the Jewish -Catholic Dialogue and supporting the local Shop with the Sheriff's program to provide Christmas gift to lower income children. In light of the current "hate" that is permeating our country, our state and our community, the Jewish Federation is vital as it provides another opportunity for people of all faiths, ethnicities, and color to meet with each other — as we all know that familiarity is one of the ways to break down prejudice. We hope that the commission will be forward thinking and help us in our mission. We hope that Collier County will grant this project the approvals needed, as it will benefit not only the local Jewish Community but all of Collier County as well. We appreciate your consideration of this matter Susan and Jay Weiss 180 7th Avenue South Naples, FL 34102 Packet Pg. 3261 17.B.e ' ''TERNAL EMAH This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Planning Commission members The first public meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission to consider the joint request of Temple Shalom and The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN) to Re -Zone the Temple Shalom property is scheduled to take place on June 11, 2020. The purpose of the Re -Zoning request is to allow JFGN to build its new home on the Temple Shalom property. I am a full time resident of Naples, Florida. I am involved as a volunteer in the Jewish community in Southwest Florida as well as for SCORE as a volunteer mentor. Through my involvement in SCORE, I was recognized for my volunter-- work with the Collier County Legal Aid Society. I strongly support the efforts cv Temple Shalom and JFGN to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan of Temple Shalom's property to allow JFGN to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. JFGN is the umbrella organization for the Jewish community in Naples, Marco Island and Lower Lee County. JFGN represents over 2500 members. The activities of JFGN are highly complementary with Temple Shalom and Its current approved usage. JFGN enhances and enriches the quality of life of both Jewish and non-Jewish citizens of Southwest Florida by supporting charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of this community. JFGN provides over $600,000 in grants annually; primarily to local Jewish and non- Jewish community organizations, like the Naples Senior Center and the Holocaust Museum. JFGN also partners with other religious communities local' in programs like the Jewish -Catholic dialogue and the local "Shop with the Sheriff" program to provide Christmas gifts to lower income children. JFGN has outgrown its current facilities and it needs a new home so it can continue to provide programs and services to citizens of Southwest Florida. I sincerely hope that Collier County will approve this project as it will greatly benefit not only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. Thank you for your consideration. Jeff M. Zalasky 5851 Bromelia Court Naples, Florida 34119 F 0 Cn ;_ 0 N L 0 0. CL 0 ;n 0 ;_ z Packet Pg. 3262 17.B.e Dear Commissioners and Representatives, I am asking you to approve rezoning the land next to Temple Shalom on Pine Ridge for a new Jewish Federation building. Our community of over 2500 members will use the land and the building in cooperation with Temple Shalom and will be able to continue our social service activities, our charitable work with grants to community organizations and and our partnering with other religious organizations in the region. At this time in history it is vitally important to support activities that promote peaceful coexistence. We will be fine stewards of the land. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration. Sincerely, Lea Bendes E 0 Packet Pg. 3263 17.B.e Faulkner5ue From: BellowsRay Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 3:33 PM To: FaulknerSue; FinnTimothy Subject: FW: Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation FYI R" Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section o Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Cn a� Co er County � E m Exceeding expectations, every day! W TO us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvgT. c From: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 2:33 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation M"kl Under Florida Law, e-i nail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Michael Feldman <michaelfnaples@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 3:07 AM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Marc Saperstein <mjs821@gmail.com> Subject: Temple Shalom and Jewish Federation EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. Strain, Packet Pg. 3264 17.B.e I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples to seek approval for a change to the Golden Gate Master Plan on Temple Shalom'sproperty and allow the Jewish Federation to build its new home on Temple Shalom's campus. ❑ Temple Shalom has been a positive asset to the Greater Naples community and a good neighbor for over 30 years. ❑ It serves 780 member families and has a well -regarded and much needed community pre- school that primarily serves the non-Jewish community. ❑ It has offered the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples, which has very complementary activities and membership, the opportunity to join them on its campus sharing expanded parking and facilities. ❑ During Hurricane Irma, Temple opened its doors to its neighbors for food, safety and o shelter further demonstrating its community citizenship. ❑ Temple Shalom has owned the vacant parcel for 30 years with anticipation for future n growth of services to provide for the growing number of Jewish families in our community. E I hope that Collier County will grant this project approval as it will greatly benefit not o only the local Jewish Community, but the Greater Naples community as well. N Thank you for your consideration, Michael A. Feldman, J.D., CFP® 239-238-8897 Packet Pg. 3265 17.B.e To: <Karl,Fry(a colliercountyfl,gov> Dear Mr. Fry, I strongly support the efforts of Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples as they seek approval for a change to the GG Master Plan. The plan to build a new home aligned with Temple Shalom makes for a powerful community asset. They will be able to expand and enhance their ability to support and engage in activities that enrich the quality of Jewish life. Their effectiveness in thoughtfully understanding the needs of our community in conjunction with their ability to extend various grants that serve both the Jewish and non-Jewish community is admirable and impactful. I am very familiar with their efforts as an organization. This combined with the fact that I am a neighbor falling within 1000 feet of the proposed change; I see this as an enhancement to the broader community of Collier County AND to our neighborhood. Please vote to approve this project. Sincerely, Julie A. Schmelzle Julie Schmelzle E 0 Cn a E W o� 0 N n Packet Pg. 3266 17.B.f Emails of Concern/Opposition Date of letter/ or # Name date received Email Address Organization Comments uouglasloewer201 : Concern of septic computations and 1 Loewer, Doug PE 12/6/2019 @comcast.net 4780 Pine Ridge Rd design, waste water handling 2 Loewer, Doug PE 12 15/2019 / �ouglasloewer201� @comcast.net 4780 Pine Ridge Rd Concern over traffic oouglasloewer20 Concerns over storm water and 3 Loewer, Doug PE 1/10/2020 @comcast.net _ 4780 Pine Ridge Rd drainage issues g Douglasloewer2011 Concerns over modifications made 4 Loewer, Doug PE 2/15/2020 4780 Pine Ridge Rd during zoning process @comcast.net Douglasloewer2011 Revisions of Septic computations in 5 Loewer, Doug PE 2/19/2020 @comcast.net 4780 Pine Ridge Rd first letter Concerns over increase run off, 6 O'Malley O'Neal 6/4/2020 ooeagle@aol.corn 4725 11th Ave SW noise, and traffic Q Packet Pg. 3267 17.B.f Douglas Loewer 4780 Pine Ridge Road Naples, Florida 34119 Douglas loewer2011 @comcast.net 443 880 4581 December 6, 2019 Tim Finn Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Temple Shalom Submission Mr. Finn : Please include this letter in both Temple Shalom submissions on the County Portal. Please also provide this letter to any reviewer and other agency that would normally provide expertise to the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners. I would appreciate the reviewers' input so that I can become familiar with local design criteria. This letter concerns septic computations and design. The Collier County Health Department my also have interest in my comments. My wife and I are opposed to the Temple Shalom Project. We believe that it is premature. I am a professional engineer licensed in Florida since 1983. 1 am registered in 5 other states but spent most of my professional career on the eastern shore of Maryland, Delaware and Virginia. My specialty is sewage flow, septic fields, drainage and stormwater management. Ocean City, Maryland has many of the same design challenges as Collier County, except the mean elevation is 6. 1 Packet Pg. 3268 17.B.f The Temple Shalom Project is on public water but plans to dispose of the sewage into septic fields. Most of the neighbors have wells for their domestic water and sprinkler systems. Temple Shalom has computed their sewage production at 8,884 gpd. I compute their sewage at 15,458 gpd. The difference is mostly associated with food preparation spaces at both venues; however the flow from the school should not be adjusted to 300 days and the assembly area in the new building has not been divided from the office building space. The one tract scheduled for the office building is zoned estate and could only have 2 residences on it. At 300 to 400 gpd by County regulations, that would average to 700 gpd of sewage daily at maximum design. The entire 3 lot site would total a maximum of 6 residences, totaling 2100 gpd. At 8,884 gpd, the office building will be the equivalent of 25+ houses; at 15,458 gpd, 44 houses. And CD commercial sewage is very different from residential sewage. N r Remember, that most of the residences near the project are on domestic well systems and most of them have sprinkler systems that operate off the same well. Each station of a sprinkler system can draw 2,000 gallons per hour, overnight 20,000 gallons. As the sprinkler system draws the groundwater out, the water from a septic tank disposal field (along with other groundwater in a concentric pattern) is drawn closer to the well. Then, the well refills the domestic storage tank usually in the morning right after the sprinkler system has drawn the groundwater toward the well. So, does that groundwater have sewage components in it or does the soil strata clean up the sewage before it gets to the well head? It depends on the geohydrology and will require extensive study to determine. The minimum standards for the distance between a domestic well and a septic field and system is 75 feet. However, this minimum distance is for a domestic residential well and a residential septic system. Section 64E-6.005 of the Florida Health Code states: Location and Installation. All systems shall be located and installed so that with proper maintenance the systems function in a sanitary manner, do not create sanitary nuisances or health hazards and do not endanger the safety of any domestic water supply, Packet Pg. 3269 17.B.f groundwater or surface water. Sewage waste and effluent from onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems shall not be discharged onto the ground surface or directly or indirectly discharged into ditches, drainage structures, ground waters, surface waters, or aquifers. To prevent such discharge or health hazards: (1) Systems and septage stabilization facilities established after the effective date of the rule shall be .,placed no closer than the MINIMUM distances indicated for the following (a) Seventy five feet from a private potable well as defined in paragraph 64E- 6.002(44)(a), F.A.C., or a multi family water well as defined in paragraph 64E- 6.002(44)(c), F.A.C. (b) One -hundred feet from a public drinking water well as defined in paragraph 64E-6.002(44)(b), F.A.C., if such a well serves a facility with an estimated sewage flow of 2000 gallons or less per day. (c) Two -hundred feet from a public drinking water well as defined in paragraph CD 64E-6.002(44)(b), F.A.C., if such a well serves a facility with an estimated sewage N flow of more than 2000 gallons per day... r_ Distances between a domestic well and a large volume commercial project must be much greater. The theory is that a residential septic flow will be cleaned up by its low flowrate through sand to the groundwater and then be disbursed as the geohydraulics of the groundwater flows through the subsurface materials. In fact, for this quantity of septic flow, I do not believe that the setback distance can be accommodated anywhere on the subject lot. In my opinion, even if the septic field were placed in the middle of the lot, it would still be too close to existing wells to prevent contamination. The soil is a coarse sand with stone at 2 - 3 feet down and groundwater is at 3 — 4 feet down. A canal exists at 250 feet from the proposed site, which governs the geohyrology. The course sand in the septic fields will have to be excavated and replaced with finer sand. Course sand permits the water flow to be so quick that the sewage cleaning done by the sand is much less than a finer sand. Both my neighbor's and my septic system are elevated, so the two Temple Shalom systems will most likely have to be elevated also. The existing septic system on the synagogue and school is too small. The septic tank is only 1500 gallons and the grease trap is only 300 gallons. The existing septic field dates back to 1991 and must be replaced. The fines from the sewage Packet Pg. 3270 17.B.f have settled in the sand at the stone -sand boundary at the bottom of the disposal trench. Because of the size of the system, two systems for the school and synagogue and another two systems will be required for the office building. The former will require 2- 5300 gallon tanks and the later will require 2-4300 gallon tanks. With the on -site rock being 2 — 3 feet down the installation of the tanks will be challenging. For trenches, the total field size will be 18488 SF for the Office Building and 13717 SF for the synagogue and school, for seepage beds, 14790 SF and 10974 SF. These areas do not include side slopes around the perimeter. The areas shown on the site plan are much too small. The septic fields on the site plan are very close the southerly property lines. If the fields fail or the sewage is more than the design, the overflow will run onto the southerly neighbors property from the proposed elevated system. A blowout could occur in an elevated system, bringing raw sewage to the surface which would flow offsite onto the neighbor's property. This amount of sewage will contaminate the groundwater. Even if all the neighbors change to public water, the sprinkler systems would still bring the contaminated water to the surface and the sewage component will remain on the grass. If it is determined that construction could proceed, I would recommend that the proposed food service area in the office building be deleted and the existing food service area at the school be removed. The food service areas could be added back when public sewer becomes available, so the kitchen areas could be roughed in now. This change would reduce the sewage flow from 15458 gpd by 1/3. Remember that the 5 gallons per capital per day for food preparation is not all just in the preparation. People eating lunch are likely to wash their hands before and after eating and some will use the facilities an extra time daily. Temple Shalom currently brings in food to be served to the children, so there is still a component that increases the sewage flow even though the food is not prepared onsite. Lunch cleanup requires water usage. a CD 0 N 4 Packet Pg. 3271 17.B.f The proposed building could be designed with gray water systems and reclamation of water for the landscaping sprinkler system. Retrofitting the school and synagogue would be difficult. Instead of septic tanks, a small package plant could be installed to improve the quality of the sewage before it is dumped into the groundwater. At the very least, a system to add oxygen to the system would be productive. Since a septic system is sealed from the surface, little oxygen reaches the sewage in the tanks. Sewage comes complete with bacteria, both aerobic and anaerobic. In the septic system, E anaerobic bacteria are dominant because of the low oxygen. Anaerobic bacteria act very slowly on sewage cleanup. Aerobic bacteria act much quicker. The amount of sewage cleanup performed by anaerobic bacteria in 30 days could be performed by aerobic bacteria in one day. Simply taking a large paddle and stirring the sewage and permitting surface air to be mixed in would greatly CD improve the quality of the sewage before subsurface disposal. Furthermore, the N septic fields will last much, much longer when they receive a better quality o sewage. It would appear that, if the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners approve the submission, the amount of sewage will be fixed at the 8884 gpd computed by the owner's professionals. Furthermore, there is no proposal for sewage disposal other than the standard septic field with no treatment. I can guarantee that this amount of untreated sewage will change the groundwater for the worse, contaminating the water for domestic use. We have a long history of good intentions that became catastrophes. Love canal cost $400 million and took 21 years to cleanup. Fukushima nuclear plant was built in an earthquake zone and on the coast in a tsunami zone. After 8 years, they have still not even developed a robot to locate the missing rods. Decontamination will cost $200 billion and take over 30 years to complete. Locally, the Dunbar community in Fort Myers has cost $4,000,000 to cleanup and took several years. The sludge was placed there 50 years ago. And now there are numerous health associated lawsuits. Packet Pg. 3272 17.B.f If the Temple Shalom project continues as is, who will pay for the contamination cleanup. Temple Shalom is incorporated. The County will not cleanup the groundwater on a private project. Professional errors and omissions insurance will object to paying for cleanup on a project approved by government agencies and the limits would not be nearly enough to clean up the contamination. Then, there are the lawsuits for people getting sick from the contamination. As an engineering professional with 39 years of experience in this field, there is no question that the project as proposed will contaminate the groundwater. Who will be responsible and pay for the cleanup? CD 0 N Sincerely, C- Douglas Loewer, PE 12-6-19 Ltr Doug Lower WW GAMES Planning ServiceslComprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATAIComp Plan Amendments12019 Cycles and Smalls12019 Cycle 2 - June1CP-19-2 Temple Shalom dw112-13-19 0 Packet Pg. 3273 17.B.f Douglas Loewer 4780 Pine Ridge Road Naples, Florida 34119 Douglasloewer2011 @comcast.net 443 880 4581 December 15, 2019 Tim Finn Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Temple Shalom Submission Mr. Finn : Please include this letter in both Temple Shalom submissions on the County Portal. Please also provide this letter to any reviewer and other agency that would normally provide expertise to the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners. I would appreciate their input so that I can become familiar with local design criteria. These comments and suggestions concern the proposed traffic design. I am a professional engineer licensed in Florida since 1983. I will address the traffic situation at Temple Shalom Project. The County reviewers have rejected the second entrance for the office building. I believe that a second entrance is necessary. If the lot with the proposed office building would be sold off, there would be no access except through the existing Temple Shalom entrance which would require easements and right of ways. 1 Packet Pg. 3274 17.B.f During the Neighborhood Information Meeting, the traffic engineer said that the second entrance was still in play. He said that there would be a right turn in and right turn out. Since there would be no new cross -over, there would be no left turns out of the second entrance and no westbound left turns into the entrance. He stated that there would be a left turn lane added for eastbound traffic exiting the proposed entrance at the existing entrance. This alignment would be a disaster. Currently, cars exiting Temple Shalom stack in the crossover median between the eastbound and westbound lanes, sometimes three wide. There are also westbound vehicles trying to make a left turn into Temple Shalom. The cars in the median crossover cannot see past the left turning vehicles for them to pull into the westbound lane. Adding an eastbound left turn lane will mean that the cars coming from three directions will not be able to view oncoming traffic. The new entrance should be moved to the existing crossover to the west. A deceleration lane should be placed from the end of the guard rail to the new entrance across my lot and my neighbor's lot. An acceleration lane should be installed from the new entrance all the way to the easterly property line for Temple Shalom. A new eastbound deceleration lane should be installed at the existing entrance next to the new acceleration lane. The next crossover to the east from the existing entrance should have a left turn lane, (including concrete curbing for limited access), installed, like the one recently added to Pine Ridge Road when Collier Boulevard was widened.An apron on the westbound shoulder will have to be added to accommodate the u turns. Left turns out of the new entrance across the existing crossover should be prevented. A left turn lane on westbound Pine Ridge Road at the new entrance at the existing crossover could be helpful in reducing the left turns at the existing entrance, but an analysis will have to be performed to check it's safety feasibility. It would be required if the office building were split off. The recommended left turn lane eastbound at the existing entrance should be prevented. In fact, no u turn and no left turn signs should be installed on the eastbound shoulders. There simply is not enough space between the two Packet Pg. 3275 17.B.f entrances to enter traffic doing 50 mph, change two lanes and decelerate into the proposed left turn lane. Of course, the best situation would be the installation of a traffic light at the existing entrance. Even a limited use flashing yellow light like are installed at fire houses would be great. But for obvious reasons, traffic lights are normally not permitted at religious facilities. Would it make a difference if Temple Shalom paid for the traffic light and its maintenance? The new entrance will be used by Members of the Jewish Federation. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting, the Federation said that they had 2,000 clients annually and 100 clients per day. Of the 2,000 clients, 83% are older than 70 years old. I believe that the analysis of the traffic pattern should accommodate a more elderly driver with a longer reaction time and poorer eyesight. CD N r Under the single entrance design, I also do not believe that elderly drivers should r- be mixed in with preschool children. The single entrance is at such a distance 0 from the new building that it will cause the elderly drivers to get lost on the Q school campus trying to find their way out onto Pine Ridge Road. They would ,° encounter children at certain times of the day if they used the wrong lane to exit 0 P the Temple Shalom property. Currently, there is no proposal for reworking the existing travel ways and parking areas on the existing synagogue and school portion. The traffic pattern on Pine Ridge Road must be designed with the utmost safety concerns both on Pine Ridge Road and internally throughout the existing campus. Ultimately, a mistake here will cause a tremendous increase in accidents and vehicular deaths, raise everyone's auto insurance in the area and put young children at risk. Sincerely, Douglas Loewer, PE =Pg.3276 17.B.f Douglas Loewer 4780 Pine Ridge Road Naples, Florida 34119 Douglas loewer2011 @comcast.net 443 880 4581 January 10, 2020 Tim Finn E Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 CD 0 N Re: Temple Shalom Submission r- Mr. Finn : Please include this letter in both Temple Shalom submissions on the County Portal. Please also provide this letter to any reviewer and other agency that would normally provide expertise to the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners. I would appreciate their input so that I can become familiar with local design criteria. This letter will address the storm water and drainage issues on the existing Temple Shalom buildings and the proposed office building. I am a professional engineer licensed in Florida since 1983. 1 am registered in 5 other states but spent most of my professional career on the eastern shore of Maryland, Delaware and Virginia. My specialty is sewage flow, septic fields, drainage and stormwater management. Ocean City, Maryland has many of the same design challenges as Collier County, except the mean elevation is 6'. 1 helped write many of the stormwater ordinances with the local municipalities and helped close big holes in other ordinances before they became law. Packet Pg. 3277 17.B.f The existing stormwater and drainage situation will be completely changed with the new building construction. Currently, no stormwater is leaving the site. No water leaves the site through the piped outfall at the westerly boundary of the existing developed property. The pipe runs from the end of two stormwater ditches onto the State right of way along Pine Ridge Road. The ditch along Pine Ridge Road is not functioning for stormwater management. It has not been maintained and is very overgrown. Any overload of stormwater drains into the undeveloped lot proposed for the new office building and dissipates into the vegetation and subsoil. My lot and house is directly to the west of that E undeveloped lot. The design of the stormwater for the synagogue and daycare dates back to 1991 E and was not maintained. The requirements in 2019 are much stricter than 1991. Since the daycare is being expanded and the entire property is included in the CD applications, the synagogue and daycare areas should be redesigned under theCN 0 new Code. Grandfathering the existing project should not be an option. o Particularly, since the north south ditch (the other stormwater ditch) is being N removed as part of the new construction. There does not appear to be any new Q stormwater design for the synagogue and daycare stormwater runoff on the site - plan. With the possibility of boring you, I will explain the basics of stormwater design and the pitfalls that can provide poor design and outcome. Almost all stormwater computations are based on the Rationale Formula. The amount of storage required is based upon the difference between the before and after development computations. The Rationale Formula is Q =c I A, where Q is the quantity of runoff, I is the design intensity of the rainfall, A is the area of the site and c accounts for all of the variables. The Area, A, remains the same in the before and after conditions, as does the rainfall Intensity, I. The Quantity, Q, is what you are comparing to arrive at your storage requirements. To simplify, the quantity after development minus the quantity before development equals the volume of water which must be stored onsite to be released into the outfall at the rate of the before condition or percolate into the subsoil. So, all the variance between the before and after condition is invested in the c and amplified by the same Intensity and Area numbers. Unfortunately, c can be manipulated to provide less storage than is necessary, which, ultimately, causes flooding. Two of the main attributes of c are the Time of Concentration and the surface type that the stormwater is Packet Pg. 3278 17.B.f running across. Obviously, runoff velocity is much greater over asphalt than it is through a heavily wooded area. The best way to assure the correct outcome of the quantity is to make the route of water in the before and after condition about the same. I did a presentation to a municipality of how stormwater was computed before they passed their ordinance. The first outcome was that no stormwater was necessary on the site. The second outcome was that so much volume was required for stormwater storage that there was no room for the parking and the building. I will briefly describe how this is accomplished. Let say that your lot is square, 1000' by 1000', and is situated square with north, east, south, and west sidelines. The northeast corner is the highest elevation, 100.00' and the southwest corner is the lowest elevation, 80.00'. For the ease of E computations, the grade falls at a constant rate from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. In the before condition, it is heavily wooded. The developed CD condition is a commercial development with its buildings, parking, landscaping,CN 0 etc. The subsoil is sandy with rock 2-3 feet below the surface in both before and 0 after conditions. In the before condition, the distance of flow is 1414' with 20.00' N of elevation change. In the after development condition, the elevation change is Q still 20.00', but the distance varies with the design. If the computation is going to be manipulated, the goal would be for the time of concentration between the before and after conditions be as close as possible. In other words, the time for the runoff to pass across the lot in the before condition should be as short as possible and the after condition be as long as possible. The means to shorten the before condition can be accomplished by choosing a different permeability of the soil, a different roughness of the soil and a different type of vegetation. Let's say the proper before calculation for time would be 30 minutes and the manipulated computation would be 25 minutes. In the after condition, a proper computation would attempt to hold the same distance and route of the before condition. Let's say the after condition is now asphalted and has a building on it. The direct path from northeast to southwest over asphalt for the after condition would yield a 10 minute time. However, the path can be manipulated. The runoff can be redirected to grassed swales (even choosing the thickness of the grass can be manipulated), run through pipes with a shallow grade, segment the flow so some flow portions only have 1 ` of elevation change to slow the flow and, frequently, have a weir to drop the elevation all in 3 Packet Pg. 3279 17.B.f one place, so there is less grade along the flow line. There would be many, many means of slowing the flow. Let's say the flow from the northeast corner is directed to the northwest corner (1000'), then goes though a pipe for 500' to the center of the lot, then into a ditch for 600' to the easterly property line, then into a pond for 100' and then a 400' ditch along the easterly line and then through a ditch the 1000' across the southerly property line. That distance is now 3600 ' of flow and none of it is across asphalt or a building. The manipulated time of flow would be let's say 20 minutes. Although the comparison c variable is not directly proportional to the times computed above, the difference in time greatly effects the c. In the above comparison the proper before and after times are 30 minutes and 10 minutes, a difference of 20 minutes. The manipulated times are 25 and 20 minutes, a difference of 5 minutes. The storage amount is computed based on this time number. If the 20 minutes is used, the neighbors' property and the road right of way do not get flooded. Use the 5 minutes and flooding will occur; however, the cost of the project will be much less because the storage is much less. Many times the project must be scaled back so that there is enough room for building, parking and stormwater pond or detention area. On the lot where the office building is proposed, the highest elevation is probably the southeast corner. The outfall to the County right of way is on the northeast corner and is the same outfall as the synagogue is now using (the existing ditch line that is being abandoned). The proposed flow line runs from the southeast corner, around the back of the building, into a pond, into a ditch along the westerly side of the property and, then, into a ditch along the northerly boundary with Pine Ridge Road. The distance in the before condition is 585'. The distance in the after condition will be about 1200'. The design completely avoids impervious areas. The pond is 1' deep with a weir drop design into a ditch. The office building site will drain to the Pine Ridge Road right of way at the northeast corner. Then, the runoff will run westerly along the right of way about 300'. The water then runs northerly under Pine Ridge Road. E 0 CD 0 N Packet Pg. 3280 17.B.f All of the drainage onto the Pine Ridge Road right of way from adjacent properties on both sides of the road for at least one half mile (plus the right of way drainage on both sides of the road) drains westerly along the road ditch lines. The southerly right of way ditch line is diverted to the northerly ditch line by pipes under Pine Ridge Road. The proposed flow from the proposed submissions joins the watershed drainage at that spot 2 houses from the canal in a constricted ditch. The combination of the flows then continues down the northerly road ditch to the canal. If the flow is not calculated properly on the proposed site, the flow will jump the bank at the constriction and continue diagonally across the front E yards of the two properties. Remember, the synagogue property also drains out the same outfall. There is no flow from the synagogue property now, but, when the office building is finished the water currently dissipating into that office building lot will add to the flow. CD N The proposed pond is on the westerly side of the property. If the pond is under r- designed and overflows, the drainage will be across my property toward the canal and will pond on the back of my lot because my neighbors' lot (between my lot and the canal) has a higher elevation than my lot. The water ponding on my property will fill up my storm water pond and run across the property to my south to get to the canal. The submission also requests a 70% grassed parking exemption. There is a section of the Code that states that, if the 70% grassed parking is used, the amount over 15% has to be considered impervious parking when computing the stormwater calculations. Does this stormwater section still apply if you approve the parking exemption and do not specifically address the impervious section? Under permitted uses for the CFPUD application, there is a section for PRESERVE, allowable uses. Number 4 states: Water management and water management structures, as per LDC requirements. Earlier in this letter, I described manipulation of stormwater computations. Using preserve area for stormwater management defeats the reason for having the preserve area at all. Drainage and stormwater management will be critical to the success of the project. Grassed parking only works if it is dry. Poor drainage will make grassed parking soggy and muddy. Replacing reserve areas with stormwater ponds Packet Pg. 3281 17.B.f defeats the reserve area statute. The reserve area is a place where mistakes in drainage can dissipate, but not if they are replaced by stormwater structures. A stormwater management plan and drainage plan that handles the whole site should be required. Sub areas of the two lot synagogue and daycare and the single lot proposed office building should be incorporated into this design, in case the tenants of the new office building want it to split off. Sincerely, a E Douglas Loewer, PE F- oD 0 N 1-10-20 Ltr Doug Loewer storm water GACDES Planning Services\ComprehensivelComp Planning GMP DATAIComp Plan Amendments12019 Cycles and Smalls12019 Cycle 2 - June1CP-19-2 Temple ShalomlCrrspndnc incl DEO dw11-13-20 0 6 Packet Pg. 3282 17.B.f Douglas Loewer 4780 Pine Ridge Road Naples, Florida 34119 Douglasloewer2011 @comcast.net 443 880 4581 February 15, 2020 Tim Finn Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Temple Shalom Submission Mr. Finn : Please include this letter in both Temple Shalom submissions on the County Portal. Please also provide this letter to any reviewer and other agency that would normally provide expertise to the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners. I would appreciate their input so that I can become familiar with local design criteria. This letter is a conclusion on the existing Temple Shalom buildings and the proposed office building application. I am a professional engineer licensed in Florida since 1983. 1 am registered in 5 other states but spent most of my professional career on the eastern shore of Maryland, Delaware and Virginia. In the jurisdictions that I have practiced, when a modification to existing zoning is necessary, the other sections of the respective Codes are applied as much as possible. In Collier County, apparently, Temple Shalom can change all factors when they modify zoning this way. Packet Pg. 3283 17.B.f GradyMinor says that the items of my concern will be addressed during the design and permitting stage and not at the PUD and establishment of a new "zoning". Note that the existing buildings are included in this application. This usually means that the current Code will be applied to the existing project and they will not be "grandfathered" under the Code that applied when the building was first built in 1991. The following items appear to be changed as part of these actions currently before the Board, which are not consistent with the general commercial section of the zoning Code: 1. Number of parking spaces for the new building. 2. Number of parking spaces required for the synagogue and daycare. 3. Amount of grassed parking. (70% requested) 4. No upgrade of existing grassed parking to current Code Standards. 5. Permit structural and non-structural storm water structures within preserve areas. 6. Building setback lines 7. Height restrictions These items become the basis of the new zoning and the design stage of the project. These items will not be modified during design after approval of the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners. The parking requirements for number of spaces are not from the regular commercial parking in the Code, but are markedly reduced from 230 spaces to 110 spaces because of the assembly areas. See parking letter. Since there is already parking on the shoulders of Pine Ridge Road during synagogue events, a two event day will spill 150 cars onto the road right of way. Temple Shalom will say that there is no plans to have events at both assembly areas at the same time. If that were the case, there would be no need for the second assembly area. Let me present a worst case scenario. There are two events filling both assembly areas, 700 people plus presenters, caterers and booth vendors. There are 150 cars on the shoulder of Pine Ridge Road because the parking lots are full. The CD 0 N Packet Pg. 3284 17.B.f Federation says that they service 100 patrons per day. Up to 83% of the people that they service are over 70 years old. The assemblies usually last for many hours or all day. There is a steep grassed ditch slope on the Pine Ridge Road with a three foot asphalt strip on the edge of the vehicular travel way. The 100 seniors' cars will have to park some distance from the building on the shoulder. I do not think that having those seniors can safely get to the building for services. The commercial parking requirements should not be waived for this project. The Collier County Code permits 70% grassed parking for synagogues and schools. The daycare is not considered a school under parking regulations. Daycare has a separate line item and there is no preschool listed under the school required parking in the Code. And the proposed office building and assembly area obviously do not qualify for grassed parking. Therefore, the only grassed parking should relate to the synagogue parking and not the office building and daycare, CD i.e., 91 spaces. N The existing grassed parking was not constructed in accordance with the current County Code. The current grassed parking should be undercut and replaced in accordance with the procedures described in the Code. Approval of these submissions will bypass the construction of a proper grassed parking lot. The current grassed parking area gets very muddy and forces attendees out onto the Pine Ridge Road right of way shoulder on both sides of the road. Under the modifications, Temple Shalom has requested that stormwater management and structural elements of the stormwater requirements could be placed in the reserved preserve areas. If this modification is granted, there would be very little preserve area remaining. The stormwater design for the new building is shown on the drawings. The application has remained silent on how the existing project will handle the stormwater issue. Half the existing stormwater ditches are overgrown and unusable and the other half are being removed for the new building construction. There is also no upgrade from the 1991 stormwater design criteria. Height restrictions and zoning setbacks are also changing from comparable commercial zoning. I am not sure why 40 feet in height for a two story building is appropriate, particularly, since it is slab on grade construction. Packet Pg. 3285 17.B.f I also do not believe that disposing of between 9,000 and 18,000 gpd of sewage that is only treated by a septic tank for sewage is appropriate when all the adjoining properties are on domestic well systems, especially, with the sprinkler systems. Secondary treatment should be required. The project as submitted is presented as a synagogue and campus for the synagogue. It is actually three projects on one three lot parcel, a synagogue, a daycare and an office building. The office building could be sold off separately to another occupancy that is not associated with a religious order, so it should be designed to be freestanding from the other two existing uses. Then, this process would not have to be resubmitted to split off the office building. If approved, I believe that these submissions should only pertain to the bare bones changes for the special commercial zoning in a residential area and not give the applicant special consideration for a wish list. Please let the reviewers do their job and make those decisions. Do not design the project by allowing critical issues to be decided without analyzing how the whole puzzle fits together. Sincerely, Douglas Loewer, PE 2-15-20 Ur Doug Loewer GACDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATAIComp Plan Amendments12019 Cycles and SmallsV019 Cycle 2 - June1CP-19-2 Temple ShalomlCrrspndnc incl DEO dw12-19-20 E 0 Packet Pg. 3286 17.B.f Douglas Loewer 4780 Pine Ridge Road Naples, Florida 34119 Douglasloewer2011 @comcast.net 443 880 4581 February 19, 2020 Tim Finn Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Temple Shalom Submission Mr. Finn : Please include this letter in both Temple Shalom submissions on the County Portal. This letter is a revision to the earlier "Septic" letter. I missed the second assembly area in the new office building (the print is very small), so I had to add 232 seats to the computation. Temple Shalom has computed their sewage production at 8,884 gpd. I compute their sewage now at 17,844 gpd. At 8,884 gpd, the office building project will be the equivalent of 25+ houses; at 17,844 gpd, 51 houses. Because of the size of the system, two systems for the school and synagogue and another two systems will be required for the office building. The former will require 2 - 5300 gallon tanks and the later will require 2 - 5300 gallon tanks. Packet Pg. 3287 17.B.f For trenches, the total field size will be 18688 SF for the Office Building and 18488 SF for the synagogue and school. For seepage beds, 14950 and 14790. The areas shown on the site plan are much too small. Mr. McMahon of the Collier County Health Department wrote a letter concerning Mr Herrera and my computations. Mr McMahon said that a septic system would work. I agree. There is an area of septic influence around aseptic field. That influence will extend onto the neighboring properties. In this design instance, I do not believe that 18,000 gpd can be dumped safely into the groundwater without secondary treatment. Mr Herrera stated that secondary treatment was not an option. a E I have enclosed my complete computation sheet which is what Mr. McMahon wanted. CD 0 N Sincerely, Douglas Loewer, PE Cc: Justin McMahon Packet Pg. 3288 17.B.f Temple Shalom Septic Flow Computations Revised February 19, 2020 Existing Condition Proposed Project Seats Flow Total Seats Flow Total Perseat Flow Perseat Flow Synagogue Auditorium 302 3 906 Gpd 302 3 906 Gpd Aud w/Food 302 5 1510 Gpd 302 5 1510 Gpd Daycare Children 70 101 700 Gpd 200 10 2000 Gpd Teachers 20 15 300 Gpd 25 15 375 Gpd Food 90 5 450 Gpd 225 5 1125 1 Gpd Total 3866 Gpd Total 5916 Gpd Peak 1S0% 5799 Gpd Peak 150% 8874 Gpd Sq Ft Proposed bullding 1 22000 Auditorium 3540 Offices 18460 Federation Offices 18460 15/100sf 2769 Gpd Off w/food 15 employees 15 5 75 Gpd Auditorium 3921 3 1176 Gpd Aud w/food 392 5 1960 Gpd Total 5980 Gpd Peak ISO% 8970 Gpd Grand Total 17844 Gpd 350 Per house 51 Houses Septic Tank 1500 gal Existing Grease Trap 300 gal Existing Septic Field Size Max Max Max Max Max Width Length Spacing Sq ft Flow Trench 0.8 Gal persf 3 100 5 5000 Bed 0.6 Gal persf 1500 Trench Flow SF Max SF # of Field Size Field Size Field Size Required Trench Trenches Width Length Sq Ft Existing 57991 7249 Greaterthan 5000 1 1 2 Fields 2 Fields 36241 300 12 60 100 6041 SF each 12081 SF Total Prop ch & do 8874 11093 Greater than 5000 19488 2 Fields 55461 300 19 97 100 9744 SF each 19488 SF Total Prop off bldg 8970 11213 Greater than 5000 1 18688 2Flelds 56061 300 19 93 100 9344 SF each 18688 SF Total Bed Flow SF Max SF # of SF per Bed Size Required Allowed Beds Bed Square Existing 5799 9665 1500 7 1381 37 by 37 Prop ch & do 8874 14790 1500 10 1479 39 by 39 14790 SF Prop off bldg 8970 14950 1500 10 1495 39 by 39 14950 SF Septic Tank Size Flow #Tanks Size Actual Gal Existing 5799 2 stank 1500 2899.5 Pertank 3700 Prop ch&dc 8874 2 4437 Pertank 5300 Prop off bldg 8970 2 4485 Pertank 5300 E O t CO N E tV Q Packet Pg. 32 9 17.B.f FaulknerSue From: ooeagle@aol.com Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2020 12:51 PM To: FaulknerSue Subject: Petition # PL20180003710 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. June 3, 2020 0 t Dear Ms. Faulkner: a My property borders the proposed new development area and I object to amending the plan to allow E 4' further development of this area, specifically the 22,000 square foot community center, for the o following reasons: N The development will adversely affect my property by paving and building over land thereby reducing o the percolation and increasing run-off onto my property which is at a lower elevation. N Removing wooded areas will increase the noise from the location as well as from Pine Ridge Road. It 0 0. o would also increase traffic to the already crowded roadways. o L It is my considered opinion that any proposed amendment to the growth plan involving commercial property that is bordering residential property should not be considered unless it provides substantial E benefit to the surrounding property owners and the citizens of Collier County at large. This o redevelopment would not fall within that category. Cn Cordially, O'Malley O'Neal 4725 11th Ave. SW Naples, FL 34116 a Packet Pg. 3290 17.B.g July 8, 2020 VIA E-Mail: Heidi.ashton(cDcolliercountvfl.gov E 0 Ms. Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Esquire Managing Assistant County Attorney N_ d Office of the Collier County Attorney a E 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 0 N RE: Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (131-20180003708) Dear Ms. Ashton-Cicko: The Temple Shalom, Inc. elects to proceed with a hybrid virtual public hearing of the Collier County Commissioners during the declared emergency and waives its right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Sincerely, qaissm�an�as President for Temple Shalom, Inc. c: Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Clay Brooker, Cheffy Passidomo Richard D. Yovanovich GradyMinor File Packet Pg. 3291