The URL can be used to link to this page

CCPC Agenda 07/02/2020 Collier County Planning Commission Page 1 Printed 6/24/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 July 2, 2020 9: 00 AM Edwin Fryer - Chairman Karen Homiak - Vice-Chair Karl Fry - Secretary Patrick Dearborn Paul Shea, Environmental Joseph Schmitt, Environmental Thomas Eastman, Collier County School Board Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Individuals selected to speak on behalf of an organization or group are encouraged and may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item if so recognized by the chairman. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the CCPC shall be submitted to the appropriate county staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. July 2020 Collier County Planning Commission Page 2 Printed 6/24/2020 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call by Secretary 3. Addenda to the Agenda 4. Planning Commission Absences 5. Approval of Minutes 6. BCC Report - Recaps 7. Chairman's Report 8. Consent Agenda 9. Public Hearings A. Advertised 1. BDE PL20190001695 A Resolution of the Collier County Planning Commission relating to BDE-PL20190001695 for a 23.62 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of 43.62 feet, to accommodate an existing docking facility with one boat slip, and a new boat lift, for the benefit of Lot 410, Isles of Capri No. 2, also described as 155 East Hilo Street, in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] 2. PL20180003511: A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida relating to petition number VA-PL20180003511 for a variance from Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the Land Development Code to decrease the minimum separation distance for a communication tower from 2.5 times the height of the tower, to 1.75 times the height of the tower, in order to allow for a 262.25 foot separation distance for an existing 150 foot tall communication tower. The subject property, consisting of 7.81+/- acres, is located on the north side of Sabal Palm Road, approximately one- quarter mile east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner] July 2020 Collier County Planning Commission Page 3 Printed 6/24/2020 3. PL20180003229: A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida for a variance from Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the Land Development Code to increase the allowable height of a communication tower from 185 feet to 195 feet in order to allow for construction of a new communication tower, and a variance from Section 4.06.05.B.2 of the Land Development Code to require only one chain-link fence around the perimeter of the communication tower and the required landscaping on the outside of the chain-link fence. The subject property, consists of 0.147+/- acres of a 7.02+/- acre parcel, and is located on the west side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), approximately 1,000 feet south of Immokalee Road, in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner] 4. PUDZ-PL20190000734: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which includes the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Residential Single Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a project known as Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD. The project will allow up to 128 residential dwelling units. The property is located at the northwest corner of Lake Trafford Road and North 19th Street, Immokalee, in Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.52± acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner] 5. PL20190002635: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners amending the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05 as amended, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element to extend the availability of the Early Entry Transfer of Development Rights Bonus for property within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District-Sending Lands, and furthermore directing Transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. (Adoption Hearing) [Coordinator: Michele Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner] B. Noticed 10. New Business 11. Old Business 12. Public Comment 13. Adjourn 07/02/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.1 Item Summary: BDE PL20190001695 A Resolution of the Collier County Planning Commission relating to BDE-PL20190001695 for a 23.62 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of 43.62 feet, to accommodate an existing docking facility with one boat slip, and a new boat lift, for the benefit of Lot 410, Isles of Capri No. 2, also described as 155 East Hilo Street, in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Meeting Date: 07/02/2020 Prepared by: Title: Planner – Zoning Name: John Kelly 04/01/2020 1:02 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 04/01/2020 1:02 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 04/01/2020 3:45 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 04/13/2020 11:11 AM Road Maintenance Diane Lynch Review item Completed 04/13/2020 3:41 PM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 04/17/2020 8:54 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 04/20/2020 2:42 PM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 07/02/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 4 AGENDA ITEM 9.A.59.A.1.aPacket Pg. 5Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001695 - 021420 (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001695 - 021420 (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.aPacket Pg. 7Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001695 - 021420 (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.aPacket Pg. 8Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001695 - 021420 (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.aPacket Pg. 9Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001695 - 021420 (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.aPacket Pg. 10Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001695 - 021420 (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.aPacket Pg. 11Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001695 - 021420 (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.aPacket Pg. 12Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001695 - 021420 (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.aPacket Pg. 13Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001695 - 021420 (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.bPacket Pg. 23Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.bPacket Pg. 24Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.bPacket Pg. 29Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.bPacket Pg. 30Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.bPacket Pg. 31Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.bPacket Pg. 32Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.bPacket Pg. 33Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.bPacket Pg. 34Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.bPacket Pg. 35Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.bPacket Pg. 36Attachment: Attachment A - Staff Exhibits (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Attachment B - Resolution (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Attachment B - Resolution (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 39Attachment: Attachment B - Resolution (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 40Attachment: Attachment B - Resolution (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 41Attachment: Attachment B - Resolution (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 42Attachment: Attachment B - Resolution (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 43Attachment: Attachment B - Resolution (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 44Attachment: Attachment B - Resolution (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 45Attachment: Attachment B - Resolution (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 46Attachment: Attachment B - Resolution (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.cPacket Pg. 47Attachment: Attachment B - Resolution (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 48Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 49Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 50Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 51Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 52Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 53Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 54Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 55Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 56Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 57Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 58Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 59Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 60Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 61Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 62Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 63Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 64Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 65Attachment: Attachment C - Letter(s) of Objection (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 84Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 85Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 86Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 87Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 88Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 89Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 90Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 91Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 92Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 93Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Attachment D - Applicant's Back up Materials (12151 : BDE PL20190001695 155 East Hilo Street) 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Hybrid Virtual Meeting sign off (12151 : 07/02/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.2 Item Summary: PL20180003511: A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida relating to petition number VA-PL20180003511 for a variance from Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the Land Development Code to decrease the minimum separation distance for a communication tower from 2.5 times the height of the tower, to 1.75 times the height of the tower, in order to allow for a 262.25 foot separation distance for an existing 150 foot tall communication tower. The subject property, consisting of 7.81+/- acres, is located on the north side of Sabal Palm Road, approximately one-quarter mile east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 07/02/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Tim Finn 05/14/2020 11:34 AM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 05/14/2020 11:34 AM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 05/19/2020 11:52 AM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 06/11/2020 11:01 AM Road Maintenance Diane Lynch Review item Completed 06/15/2020 1:21 PM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 06/17/2020 10:11 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 06/17/2020 4:17 PM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 07/02/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 104 VA-PL20180003511 (5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 1 of 8 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: JULY 2, 2020 SUBJECT: PETITION VA-PL20180003511 (5650 MELROSE LANE COMMUNICATION TOWER) _____________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Applicant/Contract Purchaser: Carolyn A. Thompson, as Trustee of the Patrick “Pat” O’Donnell Carolyn A Thompson Rev Trust SBA Towers IX, LLC 5650 Melrose Lane Naples, FL 34114 8051 Congress Avenue Boca Raton, FL 33487 Agent: Mattaniah S. Jahn, Esq. Mattaniah S. Jahn, P.A. 935 Main Street, Suite D1 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider a variance from Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the Collier County Land Development Code to decrease the minimum separation distance for a communication tower from 2.5 times the height of the tower, to 1.75 times the height of the tower, in order to allow a 262.25 foot separation distance for an existing 150-foot-tall communication tower. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, consisting of 8.88± acres, is located on the north side of Sabal Palm Road, approximately one-quarter mile east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on page 2). 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Staff report - 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003511 (5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 2 of 8 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 9.A.2.aPacket Pg. 106Attachment: Staff report - 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance (12286 : 5650 Melrose VA-PL20180003511 (5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 3 of 8 Currently, an existing 150-foot-tall communication tower is within the Rural Agricultural (A) District that requires communication towers to be 2.5 times the height of tower or 375 feet of the southern property abutting the Rockedge Planned Unit Development (PUD). As such, the agent requests to decrease the minimum separation distance for the communication tower from 2.5 times the height of the tower, to 1.75 times the height of the tower, in order to allow a 262.25-foot separation distance for the existing 150-foot-tall communication tower. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding boundaries of the subject property: North: Preserves, zoned Rockedge PUD East: Preserves, zoned Rockedge PUD South: Preserves, zoned Rockedge PUD West: Single Family Residential, zoned Rural Agricultural (A) District Collier County Property Appraiser 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Staff report - 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003511 (5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 4 of 8 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is located within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict (URF), on the County’s Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual Variance requests but deals with the larger issue of the actual use. As previously noted, the petitioner seeks a variance to decrease the minimum separation distance for a communication tower from 2.5 times the height of the tower, to 1.75 times the height of the tower, in order to allow a 262.25-foot separation distance for an existing 150-foot-tall communication tower. The subject use is consistent with the FLUM of the GMP. The requested variance does not have any impact on this property's consistency with the County's GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: The agent is requesting approval of a variance granting relief from the Land Development Code (LDC) that requires residential separation of 2.5 times the tower height (375’) separation from subject parent parcel (Parcel No. 00433520005) to allow 1.75 times tower height (262.25’) for a communication tower. The neighboring parcel to the south and east (Parcel No. 00434840001) was understood by SBA and Collier County Staff to be zoned agricultural, which required a 50% tower height separation (75’) when SBA applied for its original Site Development Plan approval. The communication tower was reviewed at the Site Development Plan and Building Permit levels, granted approvals for both processes, and constructed before it was discovered that Parcel No. 00434840001 was in fact zoned RPUD at the time of the original application. The communication tower was sited to provide the code required residential separation to the north, which was understood to be zoned RPUD at the time of the original application. There are no alternate sites on the parent parcel that would meet the code required residential separation. The communication tower was constructed on or about December 2017. Verizon Wireless is the anchor tenant, they have installed their equipment on the site under a separate building permit application. The strict application of the LDC in this instance would create an undue hardship on both SBA and Verizon Wireless as they proceeded through all prior County reviews in good faith and constructed their facilities in compliance with the County’s approvals. Finally, removal of the communication tower would prohibit Verizon Wireless from providing reliable coverage in the area for at least 2 years as they would need to acquire a new tower site and proceed through the appropriate County zoning at any replacement site. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The proposal is consistent with the CCME. Section 9.04.01 of the Land Development Code gives the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) the authority to grant Variances. The Planning Commission is advisory to the BZA and utilizes the provisions of Section 9.04.03 A. through H. (in bold font below), as general guidelines to assist in making their recommendation of approval or denial. Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Staff report - 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003511 (5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 5 of 8 a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? The subject parent parcel is laid out as a triangle, if it had been a square, the requested variance would not be needed. At the time SBA originally applied for the communication tower, Parcel 00434840001 was understood by both SBA and Collier County Staff to have been zoned Agricultural. This misunderstanding was caused by an error in the County zoning map. Therefore, both parties believed that the communication tower exceeded the LDC at the time of the application, zoning review, and building permit review. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? At the time SBA originally applied for the communication tower, Parcel 00434840001 was understood by both SBA and Collier County Staff to have been zoned Agricultural. This misunderstanding was caused by an error in the County zoning map. Therefore, both parties believed that the communication tower exceeded the LDC at the time of the application, zoning review, and building permit review. c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? There are no alternate sites on the subject parent parcel that would meet the code required residential separation requirement. Therefore, the literal application of the LDC in this instance would require the communication tower to be removed from the parent parcel. As the communication tower, Verizon’s equipment, the compound, the access drive, and a native vegetation preserve are all in place, they would need to be demolished or removed. SBA proceeded through all prior county reviews in good faith, requiring them to remove the newly constructed communication tower, its caisson, and support facilities, would create an undue hardship. Further, removing the communication tower would create an undue hardship for Verizon Wireless as it would prohibit them from providing reliable coverage in the area for at least 2 years as they would need to acquire a new tower site and proceed through the appropriate county zoning at any replacement site. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety and welfare? The proposed variance (providing 1.75 times tower height, 262.25’) is the minimum distance necessary to maintain the communication tower in its current location. e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Staff report - 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003511 (5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 6 of 8 Granting the variance will not confer any special privilege on SBA. Rather, it will correct an error outside of SBA’s control, avoid an undue hardship on both SBA and Verizon Wireless, and allow for the provision of reliable wireless coverage in the area. f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? The requested variance will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of the LDC. Section 5.05.09 anticipated that the development standards for communication towers in Collier County would need to be adjusted from time to time to allow for the reliable provision of wireless coverage in all areas of the County in an orderly manner. Additionally, the communication tower, unlighted, with one dull grey support pole and no external iron works or guy wires, was specifically designed to minimize its visual presence in the area while meeting Verizon Wireless objectives. The communication tower will not be injurious to the neighborhood or the public welfare, rather, the contrary is true. The communication tower will further both the neighborhood and public welfare through providing reliable wireless coverage in the area. In 2018, 80% of all 911 calls received in Collier County were made via wireless phones. This shows that reliable wireless coverage is no longer a luxury, it is a necessity. Please see the enclosed 911 Call Statistics (See Attachment B – Backup Materials) g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? The subject parent parcel is bordered by mature vegetation which exists to the southeast of the communication tower, between it and the parent parcel property line. This vegetation will help buffer the communication tower’s visibility from Parcel No. 00434840001. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the GMP? Approval of this variance will not affect or change the requirements of the GMP. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. The existing preserve areas will not be impacted by the proposed petition. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for PL20180003511 revised on June 19, 2020. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Staff report - 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003511 (5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 7 of 8 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) approve Petition VA- PL20180003511, 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower Variance to decrease the minimum separation distance for a communication tower from 2.5 times the height of the tower, to 1.75 times the height of the tower, in order to allow a 262.25 foot separation distance for an existing 150-foot-tall communication tower. Attachments: A) Proposed Resolution B) Backup Materials 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Staff report - 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) PREPARED BY: _______________________________________ _____________________ TIMOTHY FINN, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: _______________________________________ ______________________ RAYMOND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION APPROVED BY: _________________________________________ ______________________ JAMES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Staff report - 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) [19-CPS-01945/1531834/1]23 5650 Melrose Ln Telecommunication Tower VA-PL20180003511 4/1/20 Page 1 of 2 CAO RESOLUTION 20 -____ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER VA-PL20180003511 FOR A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 5.05.09.G.2.a OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO DECREASE THE MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE FOR A COMMUNICATION TOWER FROM 2.5 TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE TOWER, TO 1.75 TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE TOWER, IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR A 262.25 FOOT SEPARATION DISTANCE FOR AN EXISTING 150 FOOT TALL COMMUNICATION TOWER. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, CONSISTING OF 7.81+/- ACRES, IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SABAL PALM ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE- QUARTER MILE EAST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951), IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC) (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a variance from Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the Land Development Code to decrease the minimum separation distance for a communication tower from 2.5 times the height of the tower, to 1.75 times the height of the tower, in order to allow for a 262.25 foot separation distance for an existing 150 foot tall communication tower, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A", in the Agricultural “A” Zoning District for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 9.04.00 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) [19-CPS-01945/1531834/1]23 5650 Melrose Ln Telecommunication Tower VA-PL20180003511 4/1/20 Page 2 of 2 CAO Petition Number VA-PL20180003511, filed by Mattaniah S. Jahn, Esq. on behalf of Carolyn A. Thompson Revocable Trust and SBA Towers VI, LLC, with respect to the property described hereinafter on the attached Exhibit “B.” Be and the same hereby is approved for a variance from Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the Land Development Code to decrease the minimum separation distance for a communication tower from 2.5 times the height of the tower, to 1.75 times the height of the tower, in order to allow for a 262.25 foot separation distance for an existing 150 foot tall communication tower, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A", in the zoning district wherein said property is located. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this ______ day of ________________, 2020. ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: _____________________________ By: _____________________________ , Deputy Clerk Burt L. Saunders, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: ___________________________ Sally A. Ashkar Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A—Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit B—Legal Description SAA 4-21-20 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 115Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 116Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 117Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 118Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 119Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 120Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 121Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 122Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 123Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 124Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 125Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - EXHIBIT “A” A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID PARCEL OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE ON A GRID BEARING OF N89°44'00"E ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF 785.00 FEET; THENCE S36°23’30”W A DISTANCE OF 434.50 FEET; THENCE S52°25’00”W A DISTANCE OF 682.34 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°01'00"E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF 762.40 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID PARCEL OF LAND SITUATE WITHIN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONTAINING 7.81 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 133Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 135Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 154Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 157Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Attachment B - Objection Leter (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 208Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 209Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 210Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 211Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 212Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 213Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 214Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 215Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 216Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 217Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 218Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 219Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 220Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Attachment C - Backup Materials (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Attachment D - Recorded Revised Deed (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Attachment D - Recorded Revised Deed (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Attachment D - Recorded Revised Deed (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Attachment D - Recorded Revised Deed (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Attachment D - Recorded Revised Deed (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Attachment D - Recorded Revised Deed (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Attachment D - Recorded Revised Deed (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Attachment D - Recorded Revised Deed (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Attachment D - Recorded Revised Deed (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or.the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendardays in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be mai-intained by ihe petitioner or the petitioner,s agent throughthe Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelinei should riotbe construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For rp..ifi. sign requireirents, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. l' The sign(s) must be erected in full vielv of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2' The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a lvood frame or to a wood panel and then fastenedsecurely to a post, or other. structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage.3' The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. lf the sign(s)1s destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the peiitioner or thepetitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFI RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAI'S BE ASSIGNED PLANNER. DAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE FORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED NOTICE AS ND DE STATE OF FLORIDA COLTNTY oF€€{+{€R 4f, tlfu BEFORE THE I.INDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, APP OR NAMEt PRI STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER My Commission Expires: (Stanrp rvith serial number) APPEARED BY SECTION IO.O3.OO OF THE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER STREET P.O. CITY T ZIP D me tt is f bL au, or-J!/tAl--, zo&., ry identification ( of Public vi\!-( I .cta,/effiNol8ry PublE St.le of Floflda Vicki Lvnn Clark Mv Commtsston GG 285454 E;gte.s 12t1E12022 Rev.3/4i2015 Printed Name of Notary Public 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Attachment E - Property Hearing Signs (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) :qi.L -'r -fY'fu.-Lj/;'rlg,.taI.-,:h EIT ,tt.ll L t..r LI EE ddilo(}rUG -tt g n il ,\I 7 a1z Jt r.r)f- -A]-'19.A.2.fPacket Pg. 244Attachment: Attachment E - Property Hearing Signs (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - i I ffi I I 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Attachment E - Property Hearing Signs (12286 : 5650 Melrose Lane Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Attachment F - Waiver Applicant for hybrid quasi-judicial hearing- 5650 Melrose Ln Telecommunications Tower (12286 : 5650 07/02/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.3 Item Summary: PL20180003229: A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida for a variance from Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the Land Development Code to increase the allowable height of a communication tower from 185 feet to 195 feet in order to allow for construction of a new communication tower, and a variance from Section 4.06.05.B.2 of the Land Development Code to require only one chain-link fence around the perimeter of the communication tower and the required landscaping on the outside of the chain-link fence. The subject property, consists of 0.147+/- acres of a 7.02+/- acre parcel, and is located on the west side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), approximately 1,000 feet south of Immokalee Road, in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 07/02/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Tim Finn 04/28/2020 3:24 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 04/28/2020 3:24 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 05/01/2020 10:14 AM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 06/11/2020 11:09 AM Road Maintenance Diane Lynch Review item Completed 06/15/2020 1:20 PM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 06/17/2020 10:12 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 06/17/2020 4:18 PM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 07/02/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.3 Packet Pg. 247 VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 1 of 9 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: JULY 2, 2020 SUBJECT: PETITION VA-PL20180003229 (RICHLAND COMMUNICATION TOWER) _____________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Applicant/Contract Purchaser: Plaza 35 – Pebblebrooke Naples, LLC; Crown Castle USA, Inc. Pebblebrooke Naples, LLC 301 N. Cattlemen Road, Suite 200 P.O. Box 230 Oceanport, NJ 07757 Sarasota, FL 34232 Agent: Katherine E. Cole, Esq. Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A. 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 800 Clearwater, FL 33755 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider a variance from Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the Land Development Code to increase the allowable height of a communication tower from 185 feet to 195 feet in order to allow for construction of a new communication tower, and a variance from Section 4.06.05.B.2 of the Land Development Code to require only one chain- link fence around the perimeter of the communication tower and the required landscaping on the outside of the chain-link fence. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consists of 0.147+/- acres of a 7.02+/- acre parcel and is located on the west side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), approximately 1,000 feet south of Immokalee Road, in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on page 2). 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 2 of 9 9.A.3.aPacket Pg. 249Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 3 of 9 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Through staff discussion, it was determined that the proposed communications tower is deemed an essential use as this will provide essential cellular service to the growing residential communities and necessary coverage to support hospital and emergency services. It shall be noted that per Section IV, 4-3(A) of the Richland PUD, essential services are allowable uses. Per Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the LDC, any tower that exceeds seventy-five (75) feet in height, up to a height of 185 feet, is a lawful use. Because carriers require communications towers to be 200 feet or above for sufficient coverage, the applicant is requesting the tower to be 195 feet (a ten-foot height variance) and a variance for a chain-link fence. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding boundaries of the subject property: North: Commercial uses, zoned Richland PUD East: Commercial uses, zoned Richland PUD South: Preserves, zoned Richland PUD West: Preserves, zoned Richland PUD Collier County Property Appraiser 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 4 of 9 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is located within the Mixed-Use Activity Center Subdistrict (MUA), Activity Center 3 on the County’s Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual Variance requests but deals with the larger issue of the actual use. As previously noted, the petitioner seeks a variance from 185 feet to 195 feet in order to allow for the construction of a new communications tower and a chain-link fence. The subject use is consistent with the FLUM of the GMP. The requested variance does not have any impact on this property's consistency with the County's GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Crown Castle USA, Inc. (“Crown”) proposes to construct a 195 ft. wireless communications tower (“Proposed Tower”) at the property located within the Richland PUD behind the existing commercial uses and buffered from nearby residential areas by significant preserve lands. The Tower is a relocation of a tower that was required to be removed from 9100 Immokalee Road (“Existing Tower”) – which is approximately 0.60 miles from the subject property. The landlord required the Existing Tower to be removed this year due to the development of single-family homes nearby by the landlord. The landlord and Crown entered into a short-term arrangement to allow for temporary towers to continue to be located on the Existing Tower site during the permitting and construction of the proposed tower. The Existing Tower has existed at 199 ft. for over 20 years providing essential cellular service to the growing residential community and the necessary coverage to support the nearby hospital and emergency services. Existing Tower receives 911 calls daily and the tower is the closest tower to the hospital. The proposed tower is located nearly the same distance from the Hospital (.42 miles). The Proposed Tower’s location behind the existing commercial uses is on a piece of land that is a stormwater pond, therefore it is regulated by the Southwest Florida Water Management District (“SWFWMD”). Construction of the tower requires an Environmental Resource Permit from SWFWMD, which dictates what actions Crown can take in construction of the Proposed Tower so as to not adversely affect the quality and flow of stormwaters in the stormwater pond system. The location of the Proposed Tower in this stormwater pond affects all aspects of construction of the Proposed Tower, including the fact that an opaque wall cannot be built around the Proposed Tower, because a wall that does not permit the free flow of stormwater will adversely change and affect the stormwater pond system. A chain-link fence that allows free flow of water must be constructed instead, and appropriate landscape buffering will be planted on-site. As provided in the enclosed letter from T-Mobile (See Attachment B - Backup Materials), this tower is essential to providing the statutory E911 services pursuant to Florida Statutes 365.172 et seq. According to a 2016 study, over 90% of households have at least one mobile phone and 48% of households rely exclusively on their mobile phones. Most importantly, 80% of all 911 calls originate from wireless devises according to a 911.gov study conducted in 2017. In the past several years, reliance on cellular devices has only increased. Without a new tower at a height of a minimum of 195 ft., several carriers will lose coverage along portions of Immokalee Road and Collier Blvd and others will experience a degradation in coverage within their businesses and homes. 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 5 of 9 Therefore, the applicant requests a variance form LDC Section 5.05.09(G)(2)(a) which allows for a height variance from the permitted 185 maximum height to 195 ft. for sufficient coverage for emergency services and wireless communication coverage. The tower is located in a PUD commercial zone with the following required setbacks: Front (25 ft), Side (ten feet) and Rear (20 ft). The Tower itself is located at more than 158 feet from the closest property line. The nearest residential area is over 540 ft. away where the required setback is 488 ft. T he applicant has also provided a fall zone letter stating that in the event of a theoretical fall, the proposed tower has a point of buckle (fall point) at 137 ft. – well below the distance to any of the adjacent property lines and the nearest residential property. (See Attachment B - Backup Materials). The applicant is not currently requesting any setback variances based on the PUD setbacks. [NOTE: previously, the applicant desired to request setback variances as the tower was over proposed at over 250 feet in height which would have required a 600 ft. setback to the nearest residential area; the applicant has modified its request accordingly to avoid any request for a variance to setbacks to residential areas]. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The proposal is consistent with the CCME. Section 9.04.01 of the Land Development Code gives the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) the authority to grant Variances. The Planning Commission is advisory to the BZA and utilizes the provisions of Section 9.04.03 A. through H. (in bold font below), as general guidelines to assist in making their recommendation of approval or denial. Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? The request for height variance is due to the requirements of carriers to have a tower at 200 feet or above; due to setback restrictions and sensitivity to the neighborhood, the applicant has limited the request to 195 feet (a ten-foot height variance). The structure of a wireless communication tower requires certain heights to meet the needs of the carriers. For the carriers to provide sufficient E911 coverage and service to this area, the minimum height necessary is 195 feet. The request for wall variance (from the opaque wall requirement of section 4.06.05.B.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code) is due to the unique location of the site in a stormwater pond, which affects construction on-site due to regulation by SWFWMD. The tower and supporting equipment is proposed to be constructed on a platform to minimize adverse effects of the quality and flow of stormwater; therefore, an opaque wall on a platform would not be practical; further, constructing a wall around the platform would impact the stormwater pond and its functionality. Crown intends to build a chain-link fence in the same required height and area as the opaque wall would be required on the platform and install landscaping outside of the platform area to add additional buffer. 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 6 of 9 b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? The existing tower which is being replaced is 195 feet. The carriers require at minimum the same height to be able to maintain service in the area and the proposed site is the only available site after an exhaustive search. The nature of the location as a stormwater pond is a pre-existing condition on-site and is not due to the actions of Crown. c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? The literal interpretation of the Code to limit a tower in this area to 185 feet creates a practical difficulty as the service and coverage requirement is not maintained and the need for a tower lessened. Copies of coverages are included in this application. (See Attachment B - Backup Materials) The literal interpretation of the Code to require an opaque wall on-site creates a practical difficulty as it would result barrier to the free flow and quality of stormwater on site and will run afoul of SWFWMD regulations. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety and welfare? Yes, the ten-foot variance is the minimum necessary to allow for sufficient coverage and replacement of the existing tower. As to the wall, a chain link fence that matches the dimensional requirements of the Code’s opaque wall, in conjunction with appropriate landscape buffering, is the minimum necessary to avoid adverse interference with the stormwater pond on-site. As the location sits behind existing commercial uses, a chain link fence with landscape buffering will adequately buffer the Proposed Tower. e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? Yes, by definition, a Variance bestows some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations specific to a site. However, LDC Section 9.04.02 provides relief through the Variance process for any dimensional development standard, such as the requested height increase and chain-link fence. As such, other properties facing a similar hardship would be entitled to make a similar request and would be conferred equal consideration on a case by case basis. 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 7 of 9 f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? The variance is in harmony with the intent and purpose of the code to allow for a tower with a height to accommodate up to four provider antennae. The wall variance is in harmony with the intent and purpose of the Code to ensure adequate fencing and buffering on-site, which the chain link fence and landscape buffering will satisfy. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? The proposed tower is near a natural preserve but set back more than half the tower height and greater than the breakpoint. The height variance does not impact any natural areas. The chain link fence will promote the preservation of the existing stormwater pond on-site, and the nearby natural preserve in conjunction with the proposed landscaping will cause the Proposed Tower to blend nicely with the area where it will sit behind the existing commercial uses. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the GMP? Approval of this variance will not affect or change the requirements of the GMP. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. The existing preserve areas will not be impacted by the proposed petition. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for PL20180003229 revised on June 19, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) approve Petition VA- PL20180003229, Richland Communication Tower Variance to increase the allowable height of a communication tower from 185 feet to 195 feet in order to allow for construction of a new communications tower, and a variance from Section 4.06.05.B.2 of the Land Development Code 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 8 of 9 to require only one chain-link fence around the perimeter of the communication tower and the required landscaping on the outside of the chain-link fence Attachments: A) Proposed Resolution B) Backup Materials 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) PREPARED BY: _______________________________________ _____________________ TIMOTHY FINN, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: _______________________________________ ______________________ RAYMOND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION APPROVED BY: _________________________________________ ______________________ JAMES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.bPacket Pg. 259Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.bPacket Pg. 260Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.bPacket Pg. 261Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.bPacket Pg. 262Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.bPacket Pg. 263Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.bPacket Pg. 264Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.bPacket Pg. 265Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252‐2400 FAX: (239) 252‐6358 4/27/2018 Page 1 of 6 VARIANCE PETITION APPLICATION Variance from Setbacks Required for a Particular Zoning District LDC section 9.04.00 & Code of Laws section 2‐83 – 2‐90 Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): ______________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: __________________________________________ Address: _________________________City: ________________ State: _______ ZIP: ________ Telephone: ___________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ____________________ E‐Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ________________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: ___________________________City: ________________ State: _______ ZIP: ______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ___________________ Fax: ____________________ E‐Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. To be completed by staff Crown Castle USA, Inc Katherine E. Cole, Esq. Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A. 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 800 Clearwater FL 33755 727-259-6791 katie.cole@hwhlaw.com 301 N. Cattlemen Road, Suite 200 Sarasota FL 34232 Plaza 35-Pebblebrooke Naples, LLC, and Pebblebrooke-Naples, LLC 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 4/27/2018 Page 2 of 6 PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: ____________________ Section/Township/Range: / / Subdivision: _____________________________________ Unit: _____Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds Description: __________________________________ Total Acreage: ______ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: ______________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: Front: Corner Lot: Yes No Side: Waterfront Lot: Yes No Rear: Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 4/27/2018 Page 3 of 6 ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: _____ NATURE OF PETITION On a separate sheet, attached to the application, please provide the following: 1. A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing prin cipal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 4/27/2018 Page 4 of 6 b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? 4. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No If yes, please provide copies. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 4/27/2018 Page 5 of 6 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Variance Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) Pre-Application Meeting Notes 1 Project Narrative Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Conceptual Site Plan 24” x 36” and one 8 ½ ” x 11” copy Survey of property showing the encroachment (measured in feet) 2 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 Deeds/Legal’s 3 Location map 1 Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial 5 Historical Survey or waiver request 1 Environmental Data Requirements or exemption justification 3 Once the first set of review comments are posted, provide the assigned planner the Property Owner Advisory Letter and Certification 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 15205 Collier Boulevard Communications Tower as Essential Service Variance for Tower Height (185 ft. permitted; 195 ft. requested) and Variance for Wall (Opaque required; Chain Link requested) Crown Castle USA (“Crown”) proposes to construct a 195 ft. wireless communications tower (“Proposed Tower”) at the property located within the Richland PUD behind the existing commercial uses and buffered from nearby residential areas by significant preserve lands. The Tower is a relocation of a tower that was required to be removed from 9100 Immokalee Road (“Existing Tower”) – which is approximately 0.60 miles from the subject property. The landlord required the Existing Tower to be removed this year due to the development of single family homes nearby by the landlord. The landlord and Crown entered into a short-term arrangement to allow for temporary towers to continue to be located on the Existing Tower site during the permitting and construction of the proposed tower. The Existing Tower has existed at 199 ft. for over 20 years providing essential cellular service to the growing residential community and the necessary coverage to support the nearby hospital and emergency services. Existing Tower receives 911 calls daily and the tower is the closest towe r to the hospital. The proposed tower is located nearly the same distance from the Hospital (.42 miles). The Proposed Tower’s location behind the existing commercial uses is on a piece of land that is a stormwater pond, therefore it is regulated by the Southwest Florida Water Management District (“SWFWMD”). Construction of the tower requires an Environmental Resource Permit from SWFWMD, which dictates what actions Crown can take in construction of the Proposed Tower so as to not adversely affect the quality and flow of stormwaters in the stormwater pond system. The location of the Proposed Tower in this stormwater pond affects all aspects of construction of the Proposed Tower, including the fact that an opaque wall cannot be built around the Proposed Tower, because a wall that does not permit the free flow of stormwater will adversely change and affect the stormwater pond system. A wall that allows free flow of water must be constructed instead, and appropriate landscape buffering will be planted on-site. As provided in the enclosed letter from T-mobile, this tower is essential to providing the statutory E911 services pursuant to Florida Statutes 365.172 et seq. According to a 2016 study, over 90% of households have at least one mobile phone and 48% of households rely exclusively on their mobile phones. Most importantly, 80% of all 911 calls originate from wireless devises according to a 911.gov study conducted in 2017. In the past several years, reliance on cellular devices has only increased. Without a new tower at a height of 195 ft., several carriers will lose coverage along portions of Immokalee Road and Collier Blvd and others will experience a degradation in coverage within their businesses and homes. Consideration of Criteria: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved? The request for height variance is due to the requirements of carriers to have a tower at 200 feet or above; due to setback restrictions and sensitivity to the neighborhood, the applicant has limited the request to 195 feet (a ten foot height variance). The structure of a wireless communication tower requires certain heights to meet the needs of the carriers. For the carriers to provide sufficient E911 coverage and service to this area, the minimum height necessary is 195 feet. The request for wall variance (from the opaque wall requirement of section 4.06.05.B.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code) is due to the unique location of the site in a stormwater pond, which affects construction on-site due to regulation by SWFWMD. The tower and supporting equipment is proposed to be constructed on a platform to minimize adverse affects of the quality and flow of 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) stormwater; therefore, an opaque wall on a platform would not be practical; further, constructing a wall around the platform would impact the stormwater pond and its functionality. Crown intends to build a chain-link fence in the same required height and area as the opaque wall would be required on the platform, and install landscaping outside of the platform area to add additional buffer. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request? The existing tower which is being replaced is 195 feet. The carriers require at minimum the same height to be able to maintain service in the area and the proposed site is the only available site after an exhaustive search. The nature of the location as a stormwater pond is a pre-existing condition on-site and is not due to the actions of Crown. c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of the zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the application or create practical difficulties on the applicant? The literal interpretation of the Code to limit a tower in this area to 185 feet creates a practical difficulty as the service and coverage requirement is not maintained and the need for a tower lessened. Copies of coverages are included in this application. The literal interpretation of the Code to require an opaque wall on-site creates a practical difficulty as it would result barrier to the free flow and quality of stormwater on site, and will run afoul of SWFWMD regulations. d. Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare? Yes as to the tower height. The ten foot variance is the minimum necessary to allow for sufficient coverage and replacement of the existing tower. Yes as to the wall. A chain link fence that matches the dimensional requirements of the Code’s opaque wall, in conjunction with appropriate landscape buffering, is the minimum necessary to avoid adverse interference with the stormwater pond on-site. As the location sits behind existing commercial uses, a chain link fence with landscape buffering will adequately buffer the Proposed Tower. e. Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? No. Wireless Towers are essential services and permitted in all zoning districts and in PUDs without exception or extraordinary requirements pursuant to the zoning code. Therefore gra nting both the tower height and wall variances will not confer any special, otherwise denied privilege. f. Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? The tower height variance is in harmony with the intent and purpose of the Code to allow for a tower with a height to accommodate up to four provider antennae. The wall variance is in harmony with the intent and purpose of the Code to ensure adequate fencing and buffering on-site, which the chain link fence and landscape buffering will satisfy. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc? 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 14061564v1 The Proposed Tower is near a natural preserve but set back more than half the tower height and greater than the breakpoint. The height variance does not impact any natural areas. The chain link fence will promote the preservation of the existing stormwater pond on-site, and the nearby natural preserve in conjunction with the proposed landscaping will cause the Proposed Tower to blend nicely with the area where it will sit behind the existing commercial uses. h. Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Yes. The variances will allow for the Proposed Tower to be placed on-site, both as to the necessary height and the necessary chain link as opposed to opaque fence. The placement of the Proposed Tower in this location allows for maintained emergency services and consistent wireless communication coverage in the community where the Existing Tower must be removed. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ^_ 830336 Verizon with 830336 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ^_^_815732 Verizon with 815732 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ^_ 830336 T-Mobile with 830336 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ^_^_815732 T-Mobile with 815732 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ^_ 830336 Sprint with 830336 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ^_^_815732 Sprint with 815732 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Crown Castle 4511 North Himes Avenue, Suite #210 Tampa, FL 33614 EXISTING SITE: 815731 - Randall 9100 Immokalee Rd, Naples, FL 33964 Address: Latitude: 26° 16’ 22.10” Longitude: -81° 40' 56.30" Tower Type: Monopole Tower AGL: 199.33’ Ground AMSL: 17’ CANDIDATE SITE: Candidate C – Pebblebrook 15205 Collier Blvd., Naples, FL 34119 Address: Latitude: 26° 16' 12.7848" Longitude: -81° 41’ 29.724" Tower Type: Monopole Tower AGL: Ground AMSL: 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) (In rear of building at 15215 Collier Blvd) - PEBBLEBROOKE COMM PHASE IV TRACT 1 27-48-26 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 66261900022 8/29/19 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 289Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Variance - PL20180003229 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Variance - PL20180003229 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Variance -PL20180003229 (Communication Tower Relocation) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Legal Description 13009240v1 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) RANDALL RELO / 8308336195' MONOPOLEZONING DRAWINGSSITE INFORMATIONSHEET INDEXSITE NAME:SITE NUMBER:PARENT PARCEL ADDRESS:PROPERTY OWNER:APPLICANT:PARCEL NUMBER:ACREAGE OF PARENT PARCEL:ACREAGE OF PROPOSED LEASE AREA:PARCEL'S ZONING DISTRICT:PARCEL'S FUTURE LAND USE:SITE TYPE:COUNTY:JURISDICTION:SITE COORDINATES:STRUCTURE TYPE:TOWER HEIGHT:THE FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION;THEREFORE, THERE IS NO HANDICAP ACCESS REQUIRED.THE PROPOSED FACILITY IS NOT INTENDED FOR PERMANENTEMPLOYEE OCCUPANCY; THEREFORE, ADDITIONAL SITE PARKING ISNOT REQUIRED.OCCUPANCY IS LIMITED TO PERIODIC MAINTENANCE ANDINSPECTION BY TECHNICIANS APPROXIMATELY ONCE A MONTH.DOES NOT REQUIRE POTABLE WATER, SEPTIC TANKS OR SANITARYSERVICE.NO EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS OR WATER LINES ARE IN THE VICINITYOF THE PROPOSED TOWER.RANDALL RELO830833615205 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119PEBBLEBROOKS RETAIL INVESTORSCROWN CASTLE66261900022±7.020.147PUDPUBRAWLANDCOLLIERCOLLIER COUNTYN 26° 16' 12.77" (LAT)W 81° 41' 29.69" (LON)MONOPOLE195' AGLwww.sunshine811.comT-1TITLE SHEETRANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PESITESITECROWNCASTLE9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 297Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) COLLIER BLVD. (CR 591)SCALE: 1" = 100'OVERALL SITE PLANZ-11SCALE BASED ON 11"x17" ONLYGRAPHIC SCALEZ-1OVERALLSITE PLANTOWER SETBACK TABLEZ-1SCALE: N. T. S.AERIAL PLAN2RANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PEOVERALL PLATFORM SETBACK TABLE9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 298Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) SCALE: N.T.S.TOWER ELEVATIONZ-22Z-2ENLARGED SITE PLAN& TOWER ELEVATIONSCALE: 1" = 40'SITE PLANZ-21SCALE BASED ON 11"x17" ONLYGRAPHIC SCALERANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PE9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 299Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Z-3FENCE DETAILSRANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PESCALE: N.T.S.FENCE DETAILZ-33SCALE: N.T.S.TYPICAL STYMIE LOCK DETAILZ-319.A.3.cPacket Pg. 300Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 15.0 15.015.014.015.0 15.0 15.0 1 5 . 0 13.014.015.015.015.0 15.013.30 ME13.68 ME13.23 ME13.34 ME13.013.014.015.0 13.23 ME13.012.32SCALE: 1" = 40'GRADING PLANZ-41SCALE BASED ON 11"x17" ONLYGRAPHIC SCALERANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PEZ-4GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN SECTIONCONTROL STRUCTURE BOTTOM OF WEIRSTORM PIPE OUT FLOW ¢PLANSTORM PIPE OUT FLOW ¢SCALE: N.T.S. FILTREXX CONTROL STRUCTURE SEDIMENT PROTECTION SYSTEMZ-42SCALE: 1" = 20'GRADING PLAN DETAILZ-43SCALE BASED ON 11"x17" ONLYGRAPHIC SCALE9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 301Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 12.3 2SCALE: 1" : 600'AERIAL PLANZ-51SCALE BASED ON 11"x17" ONLYGRAPHIC SCALEZ-5AERIAL PLANRANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PECOLLIER BLVD. (CR 591)IMMOKALEE ROAD9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 302Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) RANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PEZ-6SITE SIGNAGEAAACAUTIONNOTICEWARNINGPRIVATEPROPERTYWARNINGSCALE: N.T.S.SITE SIGNAGE DETAILZ-61SCALE: N.T.S.TYPICAL SIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONSZ-629.A.3.cPacket Pg. 303Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) RANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PEZ-7PLATFORM DETAILSSCALE: N.T.S.CANOPY WITH EQUIPMENT PLATFORMZ-719.A.3.cPacket Pg. 304Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) RANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PEZ-8PLATFORM DETAILSSCALE: N.T.S.EQUIPMENT PLATFORMZ-819.A.3.cPacket Pg. 305Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 12.32L-1LANDSCAPING PLANRANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PESCALE: 1" = 10' (11"x17")LANDSCAPE PLANL-11BOTANICALNAMECOMMONNAMESIZEREMARKSQTYSPREADSPACINGSYMBOL25' OC113.5" CAL. MIN/ 12' HT.STRAIGHT,SINGLELEADER3' SPR. MIN.PLANTING SCHEDULETAXODIUMDISTICHUMBALD CYPRESS3' OC3 GAL /16" MIN HT.SAND CORDGRASS58SPARTINA BAKERILANDSCAPING NOTES:1.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FLORIDA #1 OR BETTER AS GIVEN IN, GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS,CURRENT EDITION, PUBLISHED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES.2.SIZES SPECIFIED IN THE PLANT LIST ARE MINIMUM SIZES TO WHICH THE PLANTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED. TRUNK CALIPER ISMEASURED SIX INCHES ABOVE THE GROUND ON TREES.3.ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COLLIER COUNTY STANDARDS ANDIN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT INDUSTRY STANDARDS IN A NEAT, HEALTHY, AND WEED FREE CONDITION.4.IT IS THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT ALL PLANT BED AREAS HAVE PROPER DRAINAGEFOR OPTIMUM GROWTH OF LANDSCAPE MATERIAL BEFORE INSTALLATION BEGINS.5.THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEADUTILITIES. PLANT MATERIAL IS TO BE LOCATED SUCH THAT IT WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH ANY UNDERGROUND OROVERHEAD UTILITIES.6.ALL PLANT BEDS AND TREE RINGS SHALL BE TREATED WITH A PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE AND THEN TOP-DRESSED WITH3" DEEP PINE BARK MULCH. ALL NEW TREES SHALL HAVE A TREE RING WITH A MINIMUM 24" RADIUS, ALL NEW TREES ANDPALMS SHALL BE STAKED.7.THE CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPING FOR 1 YEAR FROM THE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION.THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO WATERING AND INSURING THAT THE LANDSCAPING DOES NOT DIE. IF ANY OF THELANDSCAPING DIES WITHIN THE 1 YEAR TIME FRAME, THE CONTRACTOR MUST REPLACE IT WITH EQUIVALENTLANDSCAPING WITHIN 30 DAYS OF OBSERVING THE DEAD PLANT MATERIAL. LANDSCAPING WILL BE WATERED A MINIMUMOF TWICE WEEKLY FOR 3-6 MONTHS UNTIL FULLY ESTABLISHED. EACH TREE TO RECEIVE 3 TO 6 GALLONS OF WATER EACHTIME IT IS IRRIGATED AND SHRUBS TO RECEIVE 1/2 TO 2 GALLONS PER IRRIGATION. ALL WATERING TO BE IN ACCORDANCEWITH UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IFAS EXTENSION RECOMMENDATIONS. AFTER THIS 1 YEAR ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD, THELANDOWNER OF RECORD SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE OF THIS LANDSCAPING.8.CONTRACTOR MUST CONFIRM LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS WITH LOCAL JURISDICTION.9.IF EXISTING TREES REMAIN, LOCATION/SPACING OF NEW TREES MAY BE MODIFIED TO AVOID CONFLICT.10.ALL REPLACEMENT TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3’ FEET FROM A PROPERTY LINE AND 6’ FEET FROM ANYUTILITIES (ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND). ALL TREES PLANTED AND PRUNED MUST ADHERE TO THE ANSI A300 STANDARDSAND MUST HAVE ADEQUATE ROOM, WHEN PLANTED, TO MATURE FREELY.11.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL NUISANCE, EXOTIC PLANT MATERIAL. REMOVAL OF NUISANCE, EXOTIC PLANT SPECIESTHAT BECOME REESTABLISHED WITHIN COMMON, AND OPEN SPACES, SHALL BE CONTINUED FOR THE LIFE OF THEPROJECT.36" MINMISC. QTY BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SPECIFICATIONSSODTBD PASPALUM NOTATUM 'ARGENTINE'/ ARGENTINE BAHIA GRASS ROLLED TIGHT, 100% WEED/INSECT/DISEASE FREEPROPOSED 195'MONOPOLE(DESIGNED BYOTHERS)EXISTINGPARKINGLOTPROPOSED BALDCYPRESS (TYP.)PROPOSEDSAND CORDGRASS (TYP.)FULL FL #1FULLGRAPHIC SCALEEXISTING TREE (TYP.)PROPOSEDACCESS GATEPROPOSEDFUTUREEQUIPMENTLEASE AREA(TYP.)NOTE TO CONTRACTOR:1.ALL DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SOD AT THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 306Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) PLANSECTIONGRAVEL MULCH/TOPSOIL BACKFILLROOTBALL AND TRUNKTREE STABILIZATION ANDFERTILIZATION SYSTEMNOTES:A.FINAL TREE STAKING DETAILS AND PLACEMENT TOBE APPROVED BY OWNER.B.REMOVE BURLAP, WIRE AND STRAPS (ANYTHINGTHAT COULD GIRDLE TREE OR RESTRICT ROOTGROWTH) ON UPPER 1/3 OF ROOTBALL.C.PRUNE ALL TREES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSIA-300.2461217389105113X ROOTBALLWIDTH MIN.6"TRUNK/ROOT BALL TO BE CENTERED ANDPLUMB/LEVEL IN PLANTING PIT.16" DIA. CLEAR OF GRAVEL AT TRUNK FLARE.23. 4" HIGH BERM, FIRMLY COMPACTED.32" MINIMUM OF GRAVEL LIMESTONE MULCH. MULCHRINGS FOR TREES SHALL BE 5' IN DIAMETER (MIN)OR AS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.INSTALL FILTER FABRIC UNDERNEATH GRAVEL.4TERRA TOGGLE EARTH ANCHOR SYSTEMINSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS.54" MIN. OF TOPSOIL TO BRING TO FINISHEDGRADE. (SEE GRADING PLAN)6TOP OF ROOTBALL MIN. 1" ABOVE FINISHEDGRADE.7PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED.8ROOTBALLS GREATER THAN 24" DIAMETERSHALL BE PLACED ON MOUND OFUNDISTURBED SOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING.ROOTBALLS SMALLER THAN 24" INDIAMETER MAY SIT ON COMPACTED EARTH.9UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.10SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTINGPIT.11CUT BACK SLOPE TO PROVIDE A FLATSURFACE FOR PLANTING.12SCALE: N.T.S.TREE PLANTING DETAILL-21SCALE: N.T.S.SHRUB PLANTING DETAILL-22L-2LANDSCAPING DETAILSRANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PE9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 307Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 4209 Baymeadows Road Jacksonville, Florida 32217 (904) 737-1034 (904) 674-6316 (FAX) www.MartinEnviro.com Full Service Environmental Consultants for Commercial, Industrial, and Telecommunication Industries Due Diligence ◘ Sampling/Testing ◘ NEPA ◘ Ecological Services ◘ Indoor Air Quality ◘ Industrial Hygiene DESKTOP ASTM SCREEN SUMMARY REPORT Crown Castle USA Inc. Date: August 7, 2017 Site Name: Randall BU Number: 815732 Candidate ID: C Candidate Name: North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District Address: Immokalee Road City/State: Naples, Florida County: Collier (As Provided by the Client) Latitude: 26° 16' 20.4846"N Longitude: 81° 39' 15.2028"W CONCLUSION: Based on available information, no environmental issues have been identified in regards to neighboring sites and/or the subject property itself. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Desktop ASTM Screen Summary MartinEnviro Project Number: 2017-CCU-0523 Business Unit Number: 815732 Site Name: Randall Candidate: C – North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Desktop ASTM Screen was performed on Business Unit Number 815732 for a candidate site located at Immokalee Road in Naples, Collier County, Florida (Subject Site). This report is a screening tool that identifies sites with potential or existing liabilities. It should be noted that the latitude and longitude provided by the client were utilized to define the Subject Site. The Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process, American Society for Testing and Materials Practice E 1528-14 (ASTM Practice E 1528-14) consists of four (4) major components: a government records search, an historical inquiry, an owner/occupant/user questionnaire, and a site visit for the purpose of making visual and/or physical observations at the Subject Site. The Desktop ASTM Screen only contains the results of the government records search on the target property (Subject Site) and surrounding areas in accordance with the government records search requirements of the ASTM Practice E 1528-14. Martin Environmental Solution Inc (MartinEnviro) obtained a Computerized Environmental Summary Record (CESR) from Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS). The CESR is a summary of selected federal and state environmental databases with the approximate minimum search distance as defined by the ASTM Practice E 1528-14. Selected database results are summarized below. Table 1 – Computerized Environmental Summary Report (CESR) Results Standard ASTM Records On the Subject Site Within Corresponding Radius Federal – NPL No No Federal – Proposed NPL No No Federal – Deleted NPL No No Federal – SEMS No No Federal – SEMS Archive No No Federal – CERCLIS No No Federal – CERC-NFRAP No No Federal – CERCLIS Liens No Federal – RCRA-CORRACTS No No Federal – RCRA-TSD No No Federal – RCRA-LQG No No Federal – RCRA-SQG No No Federal – RCRA-CESQG No No Federal – RCRA-NonGen No No Federal – Eng No No Federal – Inst No No Federal – ERNS 1982 to 1986 No Federal – ERNS 1987 to 1989 No Federal – ERNS No State – SHWS No No 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Desktop ASTM Screen Summary MartinEnviro Project Number: 2017-CCU-0523 Business Unit Number: 815732 Site Name: Randall Candidate: C – North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District 3 Table 1 – Computerized Environmental Summary Report (CESR) Results Standard ASTM Records On the Subject Site Within Corresponding Radius State – SWF/LF No Yes State – LUST/LAST No No State – UST No No State – AST No Yes State – STCS No Yes State – INST Controls No No State – ENG Controls No No State – VCP No No State – Brownfield Site No No Indian – LUST No No Additional Non-ASTM Records On the Subject Site Within Corresponding Radius Federal – FINDS/FRS No 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Desktop ASTM Screen Summary MartinEnviro Project Number: 2017-CCU-0523 Business Unit Number: 815732 Site Name: Randall Candidate: C – North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District 4 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION SECTION In accordance with Section 5.6 of the ASTM Practice E 1528-14, if one or more affirmative responses are reported in the CESR, as summarized in Table 1, then it must be decided what action, if any, is appropriate. Three (3) affirmative responses were reported in the CESR. Based on available information associated with the positive responses, no environmental concerns have been identified in regards to the Subject Site or neighboring sites that would indicate that these responses pose an immediate environmental concern to the Subject Site. Available information includes current regulatory status as reported in the CESR, the presumed regional topographic gradients, and the location of the facility in relation to the Subject Site. Based on available information, no environmental issues have been identified in regards to the Subject Site and/or neighboring sites. No further action is required at this time. Since a site visit was not included as part of the scope of work at the request of Crown Castle USA Inc., MartinEnviro has relied solely upon the information provided in the CESR to form a conclusion and recommendation. This report was prepared for and may be relied upon by Crown Castle USA Inc., its respective subsidiaries, successors, assigns, advisors, affiliates, and lenders. Any rating agency, issuer, purchaser or underwriter of any security collateralized or otherwise backed by the property that is subject to this report or any loans placed on the property may further rely on the report. MartinEnviro also consent to the inclusion of this report in any form, whether in digital or paper format, including any electronic media such as CD-Rom or the internet, in the Prospectus Supplement relating to any securitization transaction, and we consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in such Prospectus Supplement. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) COMPUTERIZED ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY REPORT 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Project Property:815732 Randall Cand C Immokalee Road Naples FL 34120 Project No:2017-CCU-0523 Report Type:Database Report - Basic Order No: 20170801039 Requested by:Martin Environmental Solutions Inc. Date Completed: August 2, 2017 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 2 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Table of Contents Notice:IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS and YOUR LIABILITY Reliance on information in Report:This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as database review of environmental records. License for use of information in Report:No page of this report can be used without this cover page,this notice and the project property identifier. The information in Report(s)may not be modified or re-sold. Your Liability for misuse:Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use,including damages caused to third parties,and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS:The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc.("ERIS")using various sources of information,including information provided by Federal and State government departments.The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report,and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report.This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice.Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate,ERIS disclaims,any and all liability for any errors,omissions,or inaccuracies in such information and data,whether attributable to inadvertence,negligence or otherwise,and for any consequences arising therefrom.Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Trademark and Copyright:You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above.This Service and Report(s)are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc.Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s)(the "Data")is owned by ERIS or its licensors.The Service,Report(s)and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS. Table of Contents Table of Contents...........................................................................................2 Executive Summary........................................................................................3 Executive Summary: Report Summary.......................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property...................................................................................7 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties........................................................................8 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source.........................................................................................................9 Map...............................................................................................................10 Aerial.............................................................................................................13 Topographic Map..........................................................................................14 Unplottable Summary...................................................................................15 Appendix: Database Descriptions.................................................................16 Definitions.....................................................................................................27 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 3 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Executive Summary Property Information: Project Property:815732 Randall Cand C Immokalee Road Naples FL 34120 Project No:2017-CCU-0523 Coordinates: Latitude:26.272357 Longitude:-81.654223 UTM Northing:2,906,011.29 UTM Easting:434,677.73 UTM Zone:UTM Zone 17R Elevation:14 FT Order Information: Order No:20170801039 Date Requested:August 1, 2017 Requested by:Martin Environmental Solutions Inc. Report Type:Database Report - Basic Historicals/Products: Executive Summary 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 4 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Executive Summary: Report Summary Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total Standard Environmental Records Federal rr-NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-PROPOSED NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-DELETED NPL-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SEMS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS LIENS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-RCRA CORRACTS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-RCRA TSD-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-RCRA LQG-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA SQG-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA CESQG-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA NON GEN-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FED ENG-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FED INST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-ERNS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FEMA UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 State rr-SHWS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-DSHW-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-SWF/LF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 1 - 1 rr-LUST/LAST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DELISTED LST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 NPL PROPOSED NPL DELETED NPL SEMS SEMS ARCHIVE CERCLIS CERCLIS NFRAP CERCLIS LIENS RCRA CORRACTS RCRA TSD RCRA LQG RCRA SQG RCRA CESQG RCRA NON GEN FED ENG FED INST ERNS 1982 TO 1986 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 ERNS FED BROWNFIELDS FEMA UST SHWS DSHW SWF/LF LUST/LAST DELISTED LST UST Executive Summary: Report Summary 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 5 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-AST-aa Y .25 0 0 1 -- 1 rr-DEL UST AST TANK-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DEL STORAGE TANK-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FF TANKS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-STCS-aa Y .5 0 0 1 0 - 1 rr-INST CONTROL-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ENG CONTROLS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-VCP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-BROWNFIELD SITE-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-BROWNFIELD AREA-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Tribal rr-INDIAN LUST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-INDIAN UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED ILST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DELISTED IUST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 County rr-BROWARD AST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-BROWARD CONTAM-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-BROWARD UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-HILLS SWF/LF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-MIAMI CONT-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-MIAMI TANKS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-PALM SWF/LF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Additional Environmental Records Federal rr-FINDS/FRS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-TRIS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-HMIRS-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-NCDL-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-ODI-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-IODI-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-TSCA-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-HIST TSCA-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-FTTS ADMIN-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FTTS INSP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-PRP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ICIS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 AST DEL UST AST TANK DEL STORAGE TANK FF TANKS STCS INST CONTROL ENG CONTROLS VCP BROWNFIELD SITE BROWNFIELD AREA INDIAN LUST INDIAN UST DELISTED ILST DELISTED IUST BROWARD AST BROWARD CONTAM BROWARD UST HILLS SWF/LF MIAMI CONT MIAMI TANKS PALM SWF/LF FINDS/FRS TRIS HMIRS NCDL ODI IODI TSCA HIST TSCA FTTS ADMIN FTTS INSP PRP SCRD DRYCLEANER ICIS FED DRYCLEANERS 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 6 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-DELISTED FED DRY-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FUDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-MLTS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-HIST MLTS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MINES-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-ALT FUELS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SUPERFUND ROD-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-SSTS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-PCB-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 State rr-PRIORITYCLEAN-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DRYCLEANERS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED DRYC-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SPILLS-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-DWM CONTAM-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DEL CONTAM SITE-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-UIC-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County rr-ALACHUA RF-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-BROWARD HAZ MAT-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-BROWARD NOV-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-MIAMI AP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MIAMI ENFORCE-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MIAMI SPILLS-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-MIAMI GREASE-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MIAMI IND WASTE-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MIAMI WASTE GEN-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MIAMI MOP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MIAMI MRE-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MIAMI SEPTIC-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED COUNTY-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 Total:0 0 2 1 0 3 * PO – Property Only * 'Property and adjoining properties' database search radii are set at 0.25 miles. DELISTED FED DRY FUDS MLTS HIST MLTS MINES ALT FUELS SUPERFUND ROD SSTS PCB PRIORITYCLEAN DRYCLEANERS DELISTED DRYC SPILLS DWM CONTAM DEL CONTAM SITE UIC ALACHUA RF BROWARD HAZ MAT BROWARD NOV MIAMI AP MIAMI ENFORCE MIAMI SPILLS MIAMI GREASE MIAMI IND WASTE MIAMI WASTE GEN MIAMI MOP MIAMI MRE MIAMI SEPTIC DELISTED COUNTY 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 7 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) No records found in the selected databases for the project property. Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 8 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) m1d AST BONITA BAY EAST GOLF COURSE 2700 WILDWOOD BLVD NAPLES FL 34120 NNE 0.15 / 806.12 2 Facility ID: 9700984 Tank Alias | Tank Status | Status Effective Dt: 1 | U - In Service | 01-AUG-97 m1d STCS BONITA BAY EAST GOLF COURSE 2700 WILDWOOD BLVD NAPLES FL 34120 NNE 0.15 / 806.12 2 Facility ID | Facility Status: 9700984 | OPEN m2d SWF/LF FOGG'S NURSERY & MULCH SUPPLY, INC. 10270 IMMOKALEE RD NAPLES FL 34120 W 0.47 / 2,471.17 2 1 1 2 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source Standard State SWF/LF - Solid Waste Facilities and Landfills A search of the SWF/LF database, dated Jan 31, 2017 has found that there are 1 SWF/LF site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key FOGG'S NURSERY & MULCH SUPPLY, INC. 10270 IMMOKALEE RD NAPLES FL 34120 W 0.47 / 2,471.17 2 AST - Aboveground Storage Tanks A search of the AST database, dated May 1, 2017 has found that there are 1 AST site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key BONITA BAY EAST GOLF COURSE 2700 WILDWOOD BLVD NAPLES FL 34120 NNE 0.15 / 806.12 1 Facility ID: 9700984 Tank Alias | Tank Status | Status Effective Dt: 1 | U - In Service | 01-AUG-97 STCS - Storage Tank/Contaminated Facility Search A search of the STCS database, dated May 29, 2017 has found that there are 1 STCS site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key BONITA BAY EAST GOLF COURSE 2700 WILDWOOD BLVD NAPLES FL 34120 NNE 0.15 / 806.12 1 Facility ID | Facility Status: 9700984 | OPEN Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) #* #* ^_ m2c m1c(2) 81°38'30"W81°39'W81°39'30"W81°40'W 26°17'N26°17'N26°16'30"N26°16'30"N26°16'N26°16'N26°15'30"N26°15'30"N0.25 0 0.250.12 5 Miles Order No: 20170 801039 Map : 1 Mile Radius 1:18200 Address: Immokalee Road, Naples, FL, 3412 0 Source: © 2 016 ESRI © ERIS Information Inc. ^_Project Prop erty Buf fer Outlin e #*Eris Sites with Higher Elevation ")Eris Sites with Same Elevation #*Eris Sites with Lower Elevation (Eris Sites with Unk nown Elevation County Boundary Rails Major Highways Major Highways Ram ps Major Roads Major Roads Ramps Secondary Roads Secondary Roads Ramps Local Roads and Ramps State B oundary National Priority List Sites National Wetland Indian Reserve Land Historic Fill 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone FWS Special Designation A reas State Brownfield Sites State Brownfield A reas State Superfund A reas:Dept. of Defense State Superfund A reas:NPL WQARF Areas Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense (owned/adm inistered areas) 2 1 (2) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) #* #* ^_ m2c m1c(2) I m m o k a l e e R d Krape RdRivers RdRichards RdC a n n o n B l v dPipers RdWildwood BlvdSmokehouse Bay DrS u n d a n c e S t B i s c a yne BayLn Calusa Pines Dr Richards StD r a g o n L n R a m s eySt81°39'W81°39'30"W 26°16'30"N26°16'30"N26°16'N26°16'N0.1 0 0.10.05 Miles Order No: 20170 801039 Map : 0.5 Mile Radius 1:9100 Address: Immokalee Road, Naples, FL, 3412 0 Source: © 2 016 ESRI © ERIS Information Inc. ^_Project Prop erty Buf fer Outlin e #*Eris Sites with Higher Elevation ")Eris Sites with Same Elevation #*Eris Sites with Lower Elevation (Eris Sites with Unk nown Elevation County Boundary Rails Major Highways Major Highways Ram ps Major Roads Major Roads Ramps Secondary Roads Secondary Roads Ramps Local Roads and Ramps State B oundary National Priority List Sites National Wetland Indian Reserve Land Historic Fill 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone FWS Special Designation A reas State Brownfield Sites State Brownfield A reas State Superfund A reas:Dept. of Defense State Superfund A reas:NPL WQARF Areas Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense (owned/adm inistered areas) 2 1 (2) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) #* ^_ m1c(2) I m m o k a l e e R d Krape RdRichards RdPipers RdWildwood BlvdSmokehouse Bay Dr81°39'W81°3 9'30"W 26°16'30"N26°16'30"N0.07 0 0.070.035 Miles Order No: 20170 801039 Map : 0.25 M ile Radius 1:4600 Address: Immokalee Road, Naples, FL, 3412 0 Source: © 2 016 ESRI © ERIS Information Inc. ^_Project Prop erty Buf fer Outlin e #*Eris Sites with Higher Elevation ")Eris Sites with Same Elevation #*Eris Sites with Lower Elevation (Eris Sites with Unk nown Elevation County Boundary Rails Major Highways Major Highways Ram ps Major Roads Major Roads Ramps Secondary Roads Secondary Roads Ramps Local Roads and Ramps State B oundary National Priority List Sites National Wetland Indian Reserve Land Historic Fill 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone FWS Special Designation A reas State Brownfield Sites State Brownfield A reas State Superfund A reas:Dept. of Defense State Superfund A reas:NPL WQARF Areas Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense (owned/adm inistered areas) 1 (2) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ^_ Source: Esri, DigitalGlo be, GeoEye, Earthstar G eographics, CNES/AirbusDS, USDA, USGS, AeroG RID, IG N, and the GIS User C ommunity 81°39'W81°39'30"W 26°17'N26°17'N26°16'30"N26°16'30"N26°16'N26°16'N0.15 0 0.150.075 Miles Order No: 20170801039Aerial 1:12200 Address: Immokalee Road, Naples, FL, 34120 © ERIS In formation Inc.Source: ESRI Wo rld Ima gery 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ^_ 81°39'W81°39'30"W 26°17'N26°17'N26°16'30"N26°16'30"N26°16'N26°16'N0.15 0 0.150.075 Miles Order No: 20170801039Topographic Map 1:12200 Address: Immokalee Road, Naples, FL, 34120 © ERIS In formation Inc.Source: USGS Topo gra phic Map 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 15 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Unplottable Summary Total: 0 Unplottable sites DB Company Name/Site Name Address City Zip ERIS ID Unplottable Summary 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 16 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Appendix: Database Descriptions Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to ERIS at the time of update. ERIS updates databases as set out in ASTM Standard E1527-13, Section 8.1.8 Sources of Standard Source Information: "Government information from nongovernmental sources may be considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days, or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the government agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public." Standard Environmental Record Sources Federal National Priority List:rr-NPL-bb National Priorities List (Superfund)-NPL: EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency) list of the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program. The NPL, which EPA is required to update at least once a year, is based primarily on the score a site receives from EPA's Hazard Ranking System. A site must be on the NPL to receive money from the Superfund Trust Fund for remedial action. Government Publication Date: Jun 9, 2017 National Priority List - Proposed:rr-PROPOSED NPL-bb Includes sites proposed (by the EPA, the state, or concerned citizens) for addition to the NPL due to contamination by hazardous waste and identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment. Government Publication Date: Jun 9, 2017 Deleted NPL:rr-DELETED NPL-bb The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Government Publication Date: Jun 9, 2017 SEMS List 8R Active Site Inventory:rr-SEMS-bb The Superfund Program has deployed the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), which integrates multiple legacy systems into a comprehensive tracking and reporting tool. This inventory contains active sites evaluated by the Superfund program that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The Active Site Inventory Report displays site and location information at active SEMS sites. An active site is one at which site assessment, removal, remedial, enforcement, cost recovery, or oversight activities are being planned or conducted. Government Publication Date: Apr 5, 2017 SEMS List 8R Archive Sites:rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-bb The Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) Archived Site Inventory displays site and location information at sites archived from SEMS. An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. Government Publication Date: Apr 5, 2017 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System - CERCLIS: rr-CERCLIS-bb Superfund is a program administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to locate, investigate, and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The EPA administers the Superfund program in cooperation with individual states and tribal governments; this database is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 NPL PROPOSED NPL DELETED NPL SEMS SEMS ARCHIVE CERCLIS Appendix: Database Descriptions 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 17 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 CERCLIS - No Further Remedial Action Planned:rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-bb An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. The Archive designation means that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 CERCLIS Liens:rr-CERCLIS LIENS-bb A Federal Superfund lien exists at any property where EPA has incurred Superfund costs to address contamination ("Superfund site") and has provided notice of liability to the property owner. A Federal CERCLA ("Superfund") lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Jan 30, 2014 RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action:rr-RCRA CORRACTS-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. At these sites, the Corrective Action Program ensures that cleanups occur. EPA and state regulators work with facilities and communities to design remedies based on the contamination, geology, and anticipated use unique to each site. Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2016 RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities:rr-RCRA TSD-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. This database includes Non-Corrective Action sites listed as treatment, storage and/or disposal facilities of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2016 RCRA Generator List:rr-RCRA LQG-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Large Quantity Generators (LQGs) generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste or more than one kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2016 RCRA Small Quantity Generators List:rr-RCRA SQG-bb RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Small Quantity Generators (SQGs) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of hazardous waste per month. Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2016 RCRA Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators List:rr-RCRA CESQG-bb RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste or one kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2016 RCRA Non-Generators:rr-RCRA NON GEN-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2016 CERCLIS NFRAP CERCLIS LIENS RCRA CORRACTS RCRA TSD RCRA LQG RCRA SQG RCRA CESQG RCRA NON GEN 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 18 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Federal Engineering Controls-ECs:rr-FED ENG-bb Engineering controls (ECs) encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers (e.g., soil capping, sub-surface venting systems, mitigation barriers, fences) to contain and/or prevent exposure to contamination on a property. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Jan 20, 2016 Federal Institutional Controls- ICs:rr-FED INST-bb Institutional controls are non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Although it is EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency ) expectation that treatment or engineering controls will be used to address principal threat wastes and that groundwater will be returned to its beneficial use whenever practicable, ICs play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site. Government Publication Date: Jan 20, 2016 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1982-1986 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1987-1989 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Feb 8, 2017 The Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) Brownfield Database:rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-bb Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Feb 3, 2017 FEMA Underground Storage Tank Listing:rr-FEMA UST-bb The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security maintains a list of FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Government Publication Date: Dec 6, 2016 State Florida's State-Funded Action Sites:rr-SHWS-bb This list contains hazardous waste sites that are part of various federal and state funded cleanup programs. Florida's State-Funded Action Sites is maintained by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). This database is state equivalent CERCLIS. Government Publication Date: Jun 5, 2017 Delisted State-Funded Action Sites:rr-DSHW-bb This database contains a list of closed hazardous waste sites of various federal and state funded cleanup programs that were removed from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Government Publication Date: Jun 5, 2017 FED ENG FED INST ERNS 1982 TO 1986 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 ERNS FED BROWNFIELDS FEMA UST SHWS DSHW 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 19 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Solid Waste Facilities and Landfills:rr-SWF/LF-bb The Solid Waste Facility Inventory Report made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) includes all types of authorized and unauthorized facilities: municipal solid waste, landfills, dumps, construction and demolition disposal, recycling facilities, and more. Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2017 Leaking Tanks:rr-LUST/LAST-bb The Storage Tank Regulation Section is part of the Petroleum Restoration Program in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)s Division of Waste Management. In 1983, Florida was one of the first states in the union to pass legislation and adopt rules for underground and aboveground storage tank systems. Since then, over 28,000 facilities have reported discharges of petroleum products from storage tank systems. Florida relies on groundwater for about 92 percent of its drinking water needs, and has some of the most stringent rules in the country. Government Publication Date: Jun 12, 2017 Delisted Leaking Tanks:rr-DELISTED LST-bb Whereas Leaking Tanks (LST) includes only facilities which currently have contamination as recorded by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, this list contains facilities which were once included in LST data but no longer appear on the list made available by FDEP. Facilities may be removed from the current LST list because the discharge has been cleaned up, or the discharge is not required for 62-770. Government Publication Date: Jun 12, 2017 Underground Storage Tanks:rr-UST-bb List of underground storage tank locations made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). In an effort to minimize the occurrence and environmental risks of releases and discharges, FDEP administers standards pertaining to the construction, installation, operation, maintenance, repair, closure, and disposal of underground storage tank systems that store regulated substances. Government Publication Date: May 1, 2017 Aboveground Storage Tanks:rr-AST-bb The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) provides standards for aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) that have individual storage tank capacities greater than 550 gallons. The state also regulates the registration, construction, installation, operation, maintenance, repair, closure, and disposal of storage tank systems that store regulated substances. The listing of regulated aboveground storage tank facilities is maintained by FDEP. Government Publication Date: May 1, 2017 Delisted AST UST Storage Tanks:rr-DEL UST AST TANK-bb This database contains a list of closed UST and AST storage tank sites that were removed from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) storage tank database. Government Publication Date: Jul 2, 2015 Delisted Storage Tanks:rr-DEL STORAGE TANK-bb This database contains a list of closed storage tank sites that were removed from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) storage tank database. Government Publication Date: Jun 22, 2017 Federal Facilities Listing:rr-FF TANKS-bb The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Storage Tank Program registers facilities and storage tanks where aboveground or underground storage tanks store pollutants, hazardous substances, and/or mineral acid substances regulated by Chapter 62-761, Florida Administrative Code, or when aboveground storage tanks or compression vessels store a hazardous substance which requires registration according to Chapter 376, Florida Statutes. Government Publication Date: Jun 22, 2017 Storage Tank/Contaminated Facility Search:rr-STCS-bb List of facilities and tanks in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Storage Tank/Contaminated Facility Search which do not currently have active, regulated underground or aboveground storage tanks (USTs or ASTs) containing petroleum. Note that tank details do not appear for facilities for which all tanks have been removed. Government Publication Date: May 29, 2017 Institutional Controls Registry:rr-INST CONTROL-bb The Institutional Controls registry is maintained by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The registry aims to help preserve adequate protection of contaminated soil regions and help to minimize any chances of exposure. Government Publication Date: Jan 24, 2017 SWF/LF LUST/LAST DELISTED LST UST AST DEL UST AST TANK DEL STORAGE TANK FF TANKS STCS INST CONTROL 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 20 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Engineering Controls:rr-ENG CONTROLS-bb A listing of all engineering controls that are in place to eliminate or reduce the potential for contaminant migration and exposure to contaminants. These controls may include caps, barriers, guards or fences. The list is maintained by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Government Publication Date: Jan 24, 2017 Voluntary Cleanup Sites:rr-VCP-bb A listing of active and closed voluntary cleanup sites registered by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Government Publication Date: Feb 16, 2017 Brownfield Sites:rr-BROWNFIELD SITE-bb Brownfields are defined by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) as abandoned, idled, or underused industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. This is a list of sites within designated Brownfield Areas within Florida where Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreement (BSRA)s have been executed between FDEP and a responsible party. Government Publication Date: Apr 3, 2017 Brownfield Areas:rr-BROWNFIELD AREA-bb Brownfields are defined by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) as abandoned, idled, or underused industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. This is a list of Brownfield Areas, defined by the FDEP as contiguous areas of one or more brownfield sites, some of which may not be contaminated, that have been designated as such by a local government resolution. Such areas may include all or portions of community redevelopment areas, enterprise zones, empowerment zones, other such designated economically deprived communities and areas, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated brownfield pilot projects. Because a variety of sources and methods were used to derive information for this data, locations are approximate. Government Publication Date: Jun 19, 2017 Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs) on Indian Land:rr-INDIAN LUST-bb Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs) on Tribal/Indian Lands in EPA Region 4, which includes Florida. Government Publication Date: Nov 14, 2016 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) on Indian Lands:rr-INDIAN UST-bb Listing of underground storage tanks (USTs) on Tribal/Indian Lands in EPA Region 4, which includes Florida. Government Publication Date: Nov 14, 2016 Delisted Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED ILST-bb Leaking Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal LUST lists made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 07, 2016 Delisted Tribal Underground Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED IUST-bb Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal UST lists made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Nov 14, 2016 County Broward County Aboveground Storage Tanks:rr-BROWARD AST-bb List of known regulated aboveground storage tanks within Broward County, including those tanks that have been closed. The list is maintained by Broward County Government. Government Publication Date: Jun 6, 2017 Broward County Inventory Report on Contaminated Locations:rr-BROWARD CONTAM-bb The Inventory Report of Contaminated Locations has been prepared by the Broward County Environmental Protection and Growth Management Department to monitor known contaminated locations within Broward County, Florida. This report includes sites listed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), and sites licensed for contamination assessment and cleanup by the Pollution Prevention, Remediation and Air Quality Division of the Department. Government Publication Date: Nov 4, 2016 ENG CONTROLS VCP BROWNFIELD SITE BROWNFIELD AREA INDIAN LUST INDIAN UST DELISTED ILST DELISTED IUST BROWARD AST BROWARD CONTAM 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 21 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Broward County Underground Storage Tanks:rr-BROWARD UST-bb List of all known regulated underground storage tanks within Broward County, including those tanks that have been closed. The list is maintained by Broward County Government. Government Publication Date: Jun 6, 2017 Hillsborough County Landfills:rr-HILLS SWF/LF-bb List of Landfill sites in Hillsborough County regulated by Hillsborough County Government in Florida. Landfills or solid waste disposal units are classified according to the amount and types of waste received. Rule 62-701.340(3), F.A.C. classifies landfills in Florida as Class I, Class II, Class I and Class II, and Class III. Class I landfills are those which receive an average of 20 tons or more of solid waste per day. Class II landfills are those which receive an average of less than 20 tons of solid waste per day. Class I and Class II landfills receive general, non-hazardous household, commercial, industrial, and agricultural wastes, subject to the restrictions of Rules 62-701.300 and 62-701.520, F.A.C. Government Publication Date: Mar 6, 2017 Miami-Dade County Contaminated Sites:rr-MIAMI CONT-bb The Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) maintains a list of Contaminated Sites in Miami-Dade County. Government Publication Date: Apr 30, 2017 Miami-Dade County Storage Tanks:rr-MIAMI TANKS-bb A listing of Underground and Aboveground Storage Tank sites in Miami-Dade County, as recorded by the Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) Storage Tanks Program. The program conducts annual inspections to verify that facility owners are complying with the necessary requirements that have been set up to prevent any discharges into the groundwater of Miami-Dade County. In addition to compliance inspections, the Storage Tanks program oversees removal and installation of new underground and aboveground storage systems to verify that these are conducted in accordance with applicable state and local regulations. Government Publication Date: Apr 24, 2017 Palm Beach County Solid Waste Facilities:rr-PALM SWF/LF-bb Inventory of solid waste facility sites in Palm Beach County. A solid waste site is defined as any parcel of land upon which or in which solid waste has either been processed, transferred, or placed for disposal. These sites include dumps, landfills, solid waste management facilities, waste transfer stations, selected hazardous waste spill or burial sites, and wastewater sludge land application sites. The inventory is maintained by Solid Waste Authority Palm Beach County. Government Publication Date: Apr 1, 2016 Additional Environmental Record Sources Federal Facility Registry Service/Facility Index:rr-FINDS/FRS-bb The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s Facility Registry System (FRS) is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities, sites or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high-quality, accurate, and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems, state master facility records, data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel. Government Publication Date: Apr 4, 2017 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program:rr-TRIS-bb The EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of over 650 toxic chemicals from thousands of U.S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. One of TRI's primary purposes is to inform communities about toxic chemical releases to the environment. Government Publication Date: 1987-2015 Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System:rr-HMIRS-bb US DOT - Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Incidents Reports Database taken from Hazmat Intelligence Portal, U.S. Department of Transportation. Government Publication Date: Feb 28, 2017 BROWARD UST HILLS SWF/LF MIAMI CONT MIAMI TANKS PALM SWF/LF FINDS/FRS TRIS HMIRS 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 22 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 National Clandestine Drug Labs:rr-NCDL-bb The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this data as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Government Publication Date: May 4, 2017 Inventory of Open Dumps, June 1985:rr-ODI-bb The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA of the Act) provides for publication of an inventory of open dumps. The Act defines "open dumps" as facilities which do not comply with EPA's "Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices" (40 CFR 257). Government Publication Date: Jun 1985 EPA Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands:rr-IODI-bb Public Law 103-399, The Indian Lands Open Dump Cleanup Act of 1994, enacted October 22, 1994, identified ongressional concerns that solid waste open dump sites located on American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) lands threaten the health and safety of residents of those lands and contiguous areas. The purpose of the Act is to identify the location of open dumps on Indian lands, assess the relative health and environment hazards posed by those sites, and provide financial and technical assistance to Indian tribal governments to close such dumps in compliance with Federal standards and regulations or standards promulgated by Indian Tribal governments or Alaska Native entities. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1998 Toxic Substances Control Act:rr-TSCA-bb The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The CDR enables EPA to collect and publish information on the manufacturing, processing, and use of commercial chemical substances and mixtures (referred to hereafter as chemical substances) on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory). This includes current information on chemical substance production volumes, manufacturing sites, and how the chemical substances are used. This information helps the Agency determine whether people or the environment are potentially exposed to reported chemical substances. EPA publishes submitted CDR data that is not Confidential Business Information (CBI). Government Publication Date: Jun 30, 2014 Hist TSCA:rr-HIST TSCA-bb The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The 2006 IUR data summary report includes information about chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a single site during calendar year 2005. In addition to the basic manufacturing information collected in previous reporting cycles, the 2006 cycle is the first time EPA collected information to characterize exposure during manufacturing, processing and use of organic chemicals. The 2006 cycle also is the first time manufacturers of inorganic chemicals were required to report basic manufacturing information. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2006 FTTS Administrative Case Listing:rr-FTTS ADMIN-bb An administrative case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 FTTS Inspection Case Listing:rr-FTTS INSP-bb An inspection case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 Potentially Responsible Parties List:rr-PRP-bb Early in the cleanup process, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts a search to find the potentially responsible parties (PRPs). EPA looks for evidence to determine liability by matching wastes found at the site with parties that may have contributed wastes to the site. Government Publication Date: Nov 12, 2013 State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing:rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-bb NCDL ODI IODI TSCA HIST TSCA FTTS ADMIN FTTS INSP PRP SCRD DRYCLEANER 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 23 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners (SCRD) was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Coalition members are states with mandated programs and funding for drycleaner site remediation. Current members are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 2017 Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS):rr-ICIS-bb The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) is a system that provides information for the Federal Enforcement and Compliance (FE&C) and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) programs. The FE&C component supports the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Civil Enforcement and Compliance program activities. These activities include Compliance Assistance, Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement. The NPDES program supports tracking of NPDES permits, limits, discharge monitoring data and other program reports. Government Publication Date: Nov 18, 2016 Drycleaner Facilities:rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-bb A list of drycleaner facilities from the Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tracks facilities that possess NAIC and SIC codes that classify businesses as drycleaner establishments. Government Publication Date: Sep 14, 2016 Delisted Drycleaner Facilities:rr-DELISTED FED DRY-bb List of sites removed from the list of Drycleaner Facilities (sites in the EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) with NAIC or SIC codes identifying the business as a drycleaner establishment). Government Publication Date: Sep 14, 2016 Formerly Used Defense Sites:rr-FUDS-bb Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) are properties that were formerly owned by, leased to, or otherwise possessed by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense prior to October 1986, where the Department of Defense (DoD) is responsible for an environmental restoration. This list is published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Government Publication Date: Nov 22, 2016 Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS):rr-MLTS-bb A list of sites that store radioactive material subject to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing requirements. This list is maintained by the NRC. As of September 2016, the NRC no longer releases location information for sites. Site locations were last received in July 2016. Government Publication Date: Sep 13, 2016 Historic Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) sites:rr-HIST MLTS-bb A historic list of sites that have inactive licenses and/or removed from the Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS). In some cases, a site is removed from the MLTS when the state becomes an "Agreement State". An Agreement State is a State that has signed an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State. Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2010 Mines Master Index File:rr-MINES-bb The Master Index File (MIF) contains mine identification numbers issued by the Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) for mines active or opened since 1971. Note that addresses may or may not correspond with the physical location of the mine itself. Government Publication Date: Feb 8, 2017 Alternative Fueling Stations:rr-ALT FUELS-bb List of alternative fueling stations made available by the US Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy. Includes Biodiesel stations, Ethanol (E85) stations, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (Propane) stations, Ethanol (E85) stations, Natural Gas stations, Hydrogen stations, and Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE). The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) obtains information about new stations from trade media, Clean Cities coordinators, a Submit New Station form on the Station Locator website, and through collaborating with infrastructure equipment and fuel providers, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and industry groups. Government Publication Date: May 2, 2017 Superfund Decision Documents:rr-SUPERFUND ROD-bb This database contains a listing of decision documents for Superfund sites. Decision documents serve to provide the reasoning for the choice of (or) changes to a Superfund Site cleanup plan. The decision documents include Records of Decision (ROD), ROD Amendments, Explanations of Significant Differences (ESD), along with other associated memos and files. This information is maintained and made available by the US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). ICIS FED DRYCLEANERS DELISTED FED DRY FUDS MLTS HIST MLTS MINES ALT FUELS SUPERFUND ROD 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 24 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Government Publication Date: Mar 22, 2017 Registered Pesticide Establishments:rr-SSTS-bb List of active EPA-registered foreign and domestic pesticide-producing and device-producing establishments based on data from the Section Seven Tracking System (SSTS). The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 7 requires that facilities producing pesticides, active ingredients, or devices be registered. The list of establishments is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Feb 28, 2017 Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Notifiers:rr-PCB-bb Facilities included in the national list of facilities that have notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) activities. Any company or person storing, transporting or disposing of PCBs or conducting PCB research and development must notify the EPA and receive an identification number. Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 2017 State Priority Ranking List:rr-PRIORITYCLEAN-bb The Florida Legislature has established a state-funded program to cleanup properties that are contaminated as a result of the operations of a drycleaning facility or wholesale supply facility (Chapter 376, Florida Statutes). The program is administered by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The statute was sponsored by the drycleaning industry to address environmental, economic, and liability issues resulting from drycleaning solvent contamination. The program provides limited liability protection to the owner, operator and real property owner of drycleaning or wholesale supply facilities for cleanup of drycleaning solvent contamination if the parties meet the eligibility conditions stated in the law. Government Publication Date: Jul 10, 2017 Dry Cleaning Facilities:rr-DRYCLEANERS-bb A listing of dry cleaning facilities registered with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The information contains facility identification number, site location information, related party (owner) information, and facility type and status. Data is taken from the Storage Tank & Contamination Monitoring database, the registration repository of dry cleaner facility data. Government Publication Date: Mar 2, 2017 Delisted Dry Cleaning Facilities:rr-DELISTED DRYC-bb List of sites removed from the drycleaners database made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Government Publication Date: Mar 2, 2017 Oil and Hazardous Materials Incidents:rr-SPILLS-bb Statewide listing of oil and hazardous materials spills and incidents recorded by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Government Publication Date: Jul 6, 2017 Contaminated Sites:rr-DWM CONTAM-bb Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Division of Waste Management (DWM) listing of active or known sites that include sites requiring cleanup but are not actively being worked on due to the agency's lack of funding (primarily petroleum and drycleaning). Government Publication Date: Mar 31, 2017 Delisted Contaminated Sites:rr-DEL CONTAM SITE-bb List of sites which were once included on the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Division of Waste Management (DWM)'s Contaminated Sites list. As sites on the Contaminated Sites (CS) list are cleaned up or closed under risk based corrective action, they are removed from the CS list. Government Publication Date: Sep 30, 2015 Underground Injection Control Wells:rr-UIC-bb Class I Underground Injection Control (UIC) wells that are currently or were previously active, as well as proposed sites, regulated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Class I UIC wells are used to inject nonhazardous waste, hazardous waste (new hazardous waste wells were banned in 1983), or municipal waste below the lowermost underground source of drinking water. Government Publication Date: May 24, 2017 SSTS PCB PRIORITYCLEAN DRYCLEANERS DELISTED DRYC SPILLS DWM CONTAM DEL CONTAM SITE UIC 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 25 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County Alachua County Regulated Facility List:rr-ALACHUA RF-bb List of facilities regulated by the Environmental Protection Department under the Alachua County Hazardous Materials Management Code (HMMC). The HMMC regulates the management of hazardous materials to prevent discharges to the environment and provide uniform standards for the proper storage, handling and monitoring hazardous materials in the county. Government Publication Date: May 8, 2017 Broward County Hazardous Material Sites:rr-BROWARD HAZ MAT-bb The Pollution Prevention Division of Broward County tracks sites that store hazardous materials. Government Publication Date: Jun 6, 2017 Broward County Notice of Violation Sites:rr-BROWARD NOV-bb A list of Notice of Violation Sites issued by the Community Code Compliance Section of the Planning and Redevelopment Division of Broward County. Government Publication Date: Jun 6, 2017 Miami-Dade County Air Permit Sites:rr-MIAMI AP-bb List of facilities which have applied for a Miami-Dade County Air Operating Permit. Permits are required for any air pollution source subsequent to construction or modification of the facility, and after demonstrating compliance with the terms and condition of the county air construction permit. Facilities with the potential to emit the following air pollutants may require a County operating permit: Particulate Matter (PM), Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Carbon Monoxide (CO), Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), Lead, and Hazardous Air pollutants (HAPs). Depending on the type of facility and the amount of air emissions, the State of Florida may require a facility permit. Government Publication Date: Apr 28, 2017 Miami-Dade County Enforcement Case Tracking System Sites:rr-MIAMI ENFORCE-bb Enforcement cases supervised by the Department of Environmental Resources Management in Miami-Dade County. Government Publication Date: Apr 28, 2017 Miami-Dade County Fuel Spill Cases:rr-MIAMI SPILLS-bb The Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) documents fuel spill sites that are not administered by a state program. Government Publication Date: Apr 30, 2017 Miami-Dade County Grease Trap Permit Sites:rr-MIAMI GREASE-bb Any non-residential facilities that prepare or process food, discharge or have the potential to discharge oil and grease to the public sanitary sewer system, require a Grease Discharge Operating (GDO) Permit. These permits are granted by the Division of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) of Miami-Dade's Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources. Government Publication Date: Apr 28, 2017 Miami-Dade County Industrial Waste Permit Sites:rr-MIAMI IND WASTE-bb List of permits used to regulate facilities that store, handle, use or generate hazardous materials or hazardous waste throughout Miami-Dade County. The permit provides operating conditions and requirements as well as guidance for the operators. Government Publication Date: May 28, 2017 Miami-Dade County Industrial Waste Small Quantity Generators:rr-MIAMI WASTE GEN-bb A listing of Industrial Waste Small Quantity Generator sites in Miami-Dade County, as recorded by the Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM). Government Publication Date: Apr 28, 2017 Miami-Dade County Marine Facilities Operating Permit:rr-MIAMI MOP-bb ALACHUA RF BROWARD HAZ MAT BROWARD NOV MIAMI AP MIAMI ENFORCE MIAMI SPILLS MIAMI GREASE MIAMI IND WASTE MIAMI WASTE GEN MIAMI MOP 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 26 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Miami-Dade County Ordinance 89-104 and Section 24-18 of the Code of Miami-Dade County require the following types of marine facilities to obtain annual operating permits from the Miami-Dade County Department of Environment Resources Management: recreational boat docking facilities with 10 or more boat slips, moorings, davit spaces, and vessel tie-up spaces; boat storage facilities contiguous to tidal waters in Miami-Dade County with 10 or more dry storage spaces (including boatyards and boat manufacturing facilities); and commercial boat docking facilities, regardless of the number of slips - this includes the Port of Miami, Terminal Island and shipping terminals on the Miami River. Miami-Dade County is governed by the Public Records Act Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. These records made available by the Regulatory and Economic Resources Department. Government Publication Date: Apr 28, 2017 Miami-Dade County River Enforcement:rr-MIAMI MRE-bb List of enforcement cases for sites on or near the Miami River regulated by the Miami-Dade County Government, Florida. The list has all environmental information on said property coordinated and compiled by the Enforcement Section. Government Publication Date: Nov 19, 2013 Miami-Dade County Septic Tanks in Wellfields:rr-MIAMI SEPTIC-bb The Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) maintains a list of septic tanks in wellfields in Miami-Dade County. Government Publication Date: Apr 28, 2017 Delisted County Records:rr-DELISTED COUNTY-bb Records removed from county databases. Records may be removed from the county lists made available by the respective county departments because they are inactive, or because they have been deemed to be below reportable thresholds. Government Publication Date: Jun 6, 2017 MIAMI MRE MIAMI SEPTIC DELISTED COUNTY 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 27 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Definitions Database Descriptions:This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including:source,information available,time coverage,and acronyms used.They are listed in alphabetic order. Detail Report:This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record.Records are summarized by location,starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity. Distance:The distance value is the distance between plotted points,not necessarily the distance between the sites'boundaries.All values are an approximation. Direction: The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report. Elevation:The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted.All values are an approximation. Source:Google Elevation API. Executive Summary:This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections: 'Report Summary'-Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and,within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'-This section lists all the records which fall on the project property.For more details,see the 'Detail Report' section. 'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'-This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties,listing them in order of proximity from the project property.For more details,see the 'Detail Report'section. Map Key:The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property.Map Key numbers always start at #1.The project property will always have a map key of '1'if records are available.If there is a number in brackets beside the main number,this will indicate the number of records on that specific property.If there is no number in brackets,there is only one record for that property. The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation':the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation',the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation'and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables:These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons,including limited geographic information.These records may or may not be in your study area,and are included as reference. Definitions 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) General Environmental Issues and Consulting Phase I Assessments Phase II Assessments Soil and Groundwater Sampling and Testing Emergency Response and Source Removal Contaminated Site Assessment and Remediation Hazardous Waste Management NEPA Screening NEPA Environmental Assessments Section 106 Reviews Ecological Studies OSHA and EPA Compliance OSHA/Health & Safety Training Industrial Hygiene 4209 Baymeadows Road Jacksonville, Florida 32217 (904) 737-1034 (904) 674-6316 (FAX) www.MartinEnviro.com August 7, 2017 Ms. Julie Aker C/o Crown Castle USA Inc. 3 Corporate Park Drive Suite 101 Clifton Park, New York 12065 Re: Desktop FCC NEPA Screening Checklist Business Unit Number: 815732 Site Name: Randall Candidate ID: C Candidate Name: North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District Immokalee Road Naples, Collier County, Florida 26° 16' 20.4846"N and 81° 39' 15.2028"W Dear Ms. Aker: Martin Environmental Solutions Inc (MartinEnviro) has completed a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Desktop National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Screening Checklist for the above-referenced property (Subject Site). It is the understanding of MartinEnviro that Crown Castle USA Inc. is reviewing two (2) candidate locations for the construction of a telecommunications facility that will include an approximately 250-foot tower (260 feet with appurtenances) to be located in Naples, Collier County, Florida. The purpose of an FCC NEPA Screening is to identify conditions as indicated in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1, Subpart I, rule Sections 1.1307 (47 CFR 1.1307) that would indicate the need to perform a NEPA Environmental Assessment (EA). This Desktop FCC NEPA Screening Checklist is not intended to be a comprehensive review of the resources and conditions defined in 47 CFR 1.1307. MartinEnviro reviewed information from available historical and regulatory records and wetland and floodplain maps. The results of the review are summarized below: Summary of Reviews Information Database On Subject Site Within 0.5-mile Radius Historic Sites No No Natural Areas No No 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Desktop FCC NEPA Screening Checklist MartinEnviro Project Number: 2017-CCU-0523 BU#: 815732 Site Name: Randall Candidate: C - North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District Summary of Reviews Information Database On Subject Site Within 0.5-mile Radius Scenic Rivers No No Scenic Trails No No Floodplains Yes Yes Wetlands Yes Yes Based on the following factors, MartinEnviro has concluded that this Undertaking requires the preparation of an EA. • The proposed candidate site is located in flood zone AH. Zone AH is defined as areas with a 1% annual chance of shallow flooding, usually in the form of a pond, with an average depth ranging from one (1) to three (3) feet (within the 100-year floodplain). • The proposed candidate site is located within a wetland designated PFO2Cd. PFO2Cd is defined as Palustrine, Forested, Needle-Leaved deciduous, Seasonally Flooded, Partially Drained/Ditched. A review of historic resources provided through the National Register of Historic Properties (NRHP) file database service indicated that no historic properties were identified within a 0.5- mile or a 0.75-mile radius of the proposed location; however, a cultural resources survey and consultation with SHPO are still required. Please note that the file database service does not provide archaeological data and that archaeological resources also should be evaluated. Indian religious sites are not included; thus, consultation with Native American tribal organizations via the Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) is also required. The assessment revealed two (2) conditions that require the preparation of an EA. MartinEnviro appreciates the opportunity to be of service to Crown Castle USA Inc. Please contact Sherrie Leman at (904) 737-1034 should you have questions pertaining to the information presented within this review. Thad Nicholls NEPA Specialist I Sherrie Leman Senior Vice President 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Desktop FCC NEPA Screening Checklist MartinEnviro Project Number: 2017-CCU-0523 BU#: 815732 Site Name: Randall Candidate: C - North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District LIST OF ATTACHMENTS A. Site Location Map and Aerial Photograph B. Historic Resources Map C. Critical Habitat Map D. Wildlife Refuge Information E. Wilderness Area and Wild and Scenic River Maps F. Scenic Trails G. Floodplain Map H. Wetland Map I. Statement of Qualifications This report was prepared for and may be relied upon by Crown Castle USA Inc., its respective subsidiaries, successors, assigns, advisors, affiliates, and lenders. Any rating agency, issuer, purchaser or underwriter of any security collateralized or otherwise backed by the property that is the subject of this report or any loans placed upon the property may further rely upon the report. We also consent to the inclusion of this report in any form, whether in paper or digital format, including any electronic media such as CD-ROM or the internet, in the Prospectus Supplement relating to any securitization transaction, and we consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in such Prospectus Supplement. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Desktop NEPA Land Use Screening Checklist Site Type: Raw land Collocation Replacement Tower Acquisition BU Number: 815732 Site Address: Immokalee Road Site Name: Randall Naples, Florida Candidate ID: C County: Collier Candidate Name: North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District Latitude: 26° 16' 20.4846"N MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 Longitude: 81° 39' 15.2028"W FCC NEPA Category Information Source Conclusion Positive Negative (1) Wilderness Area National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2) Wildlife Preserve U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (3) Endangered Species U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (4) Historic Places Consultation with State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) is required to determine whether the replacement tower will have an effect on historical resources and archaeological resources require assessment (5) Indian Religious Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) required to determine what American Indian Tribal consultation is required (6) Floodplain Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (7) Wetlands U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) (8) High Intensity White Lights The client has provided no information to indicate that the replacement tower will be equipped with high intensity white lights in a residential neighborhood. (9) Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation Exposure The client is responsible for the evaluation of the project to ensure compliance with applicable RF Standards. If screening investigation for any of the above categories results in a POSITIVE screening, an Environmental Assessment (EA) must be prepared and filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Construction may not start on any positively screened site requiring an EA prior to the receipt of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) from the FCC. The undersigned has reviewed and approved completion of the NEPA Checklist for the above-referenced site. Prepared By: Print Name: Thad Nicholls Title: NEPA Specialist I Date: August 7, 2017 This checklist is only a summary of the findings and should be reviewed in conjunction with the NEPA Screening Report 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ATTACHMENT A SITE LOCATION MAP AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 Location Map 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 Aerial Photograph 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ATTACHMENT B HISTORIC RESOURCES MAP 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Historic Properties Map Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-00523 0.5-mile Radius 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Historic Properties Map Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-00523 0.75-mile Radius 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ATTACHMENT C CRITICAL HABITAT MAP 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 Critical Habitat 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ATTACHMENT D WILDLIFE REFUGE INFORMATION 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 8/2/2017 Zip Code Locator, National Wildlife Refuge System https://www.fws.gov/refuges/zipCodeLocator/index.cfm 1/2 National Wildlife Refuge System Find a Refuge by Zip Code Zip Code:34120 Distance:within 50 miles Refuges Near 34120 (within 50 miles) Refuge Address Distance Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge Immokalee, FL 34142 18.86 miles Ten Thousand Islands National Wildlife Refuge Immokalee, FL 34142 18.86 miles J.N. "Ding" Darling National Wildlife Refuge Sanibel, FL 33957 33.95 miles Caloosahatchee National Wildlife Refuge Sanibel, FL 33957 33.95 miles Island Bay National Wildlife Refuge Sanibel, FL 33957 33.95 miles Matlacha Pass National Wildlife Refuge Sanibel, FL 33957 33.95 miles Pine Island National Wildlife Refuge Sanibel, FL 33957 33.95 miles NWRS Home About Land Planning Visitors Wildlife & Habitat Management Policies & Budget You Can Help 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 8/2/2017 Zip Code Locator, National Wildlife Refuge System https://www.fws.gov/refuges/zipCodeLocator/index.cfm 2/2 Last updated: November 23, 2012 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ATTACHMENT E WILDERNESS AREA AND WILD AND SCENIC RIVER MAPS 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 00.510.25 Miles Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 National Wild and Scenic Rivers and Wilderness Areas 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ATTACHMENT F SCENIC TRAILS 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 Scenic Trails 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ATTACHMENT G FLOODPLAIN MAP 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 Floodplain Map 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ATTACHMENT H WETLAND MAP 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map Legend: Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Freshwater Pond Estuarine and Marine Wetland Lake Freshwater Emergent Wetland Other Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Ravine Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 Wetland Map 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ATTACHMENT I STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) THADDEUS NICHOLLS Field Scientist, NEPA Specialist Fields of Specialization Mr. Nicholls has over 10 years experience in the field of environmental consulting, including performing biological surveys, field data collection and analysis, and wildlife monitoring. His specific skills are within the realm of coastal and coral reef ecology, and Living Shoreline habitat restoration and enhancement practices. Experience Mr. Nicholls has significant experience monitoring various endangered and protected wildlife species such as bald eagles, golden eagles, Swainson’s hawk, red-tailed hawk, osprey, and live-trapping/ handling of the endangered species the Preble’s meadow jumping mouse. He has a great deal of experience collecting field data, including underwater data collection using SCUBA and underwater photography. Mr. Nicholls' skills also include performing various parametric and non-parametric statistical analyses on collected field data. His Living Shoreline work involved habitat restoration and enhancement of eastern oyster (Crassotrea virginica) and Spartina alterniflora tidal grass habitats. In addition to performing field work, Mr. Nicholls also writes and prepares materials required for SHPO submissions and NEPA reports, and performs numerous Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments. Certifications and Affiliations • NPDES Sediment and Erosion Control Certification • Asbestos Building Inspector Certification • Lead-Based Paint Inspector Certification • HAZWOPER Certification (40-hour) • ACOE Wetland Delineation Training Program • Member, International Society for Reef Studies Education B.Sc. Environmental Science with emphasis in Ecology Wheaton College (IL) M.Sc. Geology with emphasis in Coral Reef Ecology Utah State Unversity 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) SHERRIE LEMAN Project Manager / Senior Vice President Fields of Specialization Ms. Leman has over 25 years of diversified experience in the environmental field, including, but not limited to, Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews, subsurface investigations, regulatory compliance and permitting (air quality, wetlands, generators, and tanks), hazardous waste management, environmental microbiology studies, bio-remediation studies and implementation plans, environmental health risk assessment and management, indoor air quality studies, industrial hygiene, radon studies, lead-based paint studies, asbestos identification and remediation/abatement, quality assurance/ quality control procedures, and sample collection and analysis of water, wastewater, soils, and air. She also has provided testimony as an expert witness in environmental contamination cases. Ms. Leman specializes in telecommunications facilities at this time. Experience Prior to joining the firm, Ms. Leman was responsible for regulatory compliance with applicable environmental regulations for a national company within the telecommunications industry. She has significant experience in conducting and managing Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA projects for national companies, as well as the implementation of SARA Tier I and Tier II reporting, hazardous waste management, and hazardous substance storage programs. Ms. Leman also has expertise in the development and implementation of various environmental and health and safety policy, procedure, and training programs for national firms, embracing applicable environmental and OSHA regulations. She has significant experience in conducting and managing environmental and health and safety audits in commercial and industrial settings, as well as root cause analysis and corrective action studies. Certifications and Affiliations • ASTM Committee E50 on Environmental Assessment, Risk Management and Correction Action Education B.S. Microbiology / Public Health Science with emphasis in Chemistry South Dakota State University Graduate studies in Environmental Public Health with emphasis in Environmental Engineering University of South Florida 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Re: Michael F. Plahovinsak, P.E. Sincerely, Located in Collier Co., FL: 830336 Randall Relo MFP Project #: 23518-544 / TAPP Project Number: TP-17724 May 8, 2019 Crown Castle Proposed 195-ft Monopole Michael F. Plahovinsak, P.E. 18301 State Route 161, Plain City, Ohio 43064 (614) 398-6250 - mike@mfpeng.com I understand that there may be some concern on the part of local building officials regarding the potential for failure of the proposed communication monopole. Communication structures are designed in accordance with the Telecommunications Industry Association ANSI/TIA-222-G, "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures". This Structure is to be fabricated by TransAmerican Power Products I have designed this monopole to withstand a 3-sec. gusted wind speed of 159 mph (Vult) as recommended by ANSI/TIA-222-G for Collier Co., FL. The design also conforms to the requirements of the 2017 Florida Building Code. This monopole has been designed to accommodate a theoretical fall radius. The upper 58' of the pole has been designed to meet the wind loads of the design, however, the lower portion of the pole has been designed with a minimum 10% extra capacity. Assuming the pole has been designed according to my design, and well maintained, in the event of a failure due to extreme wind and comparable appurtenance antenna load (winds in excess of the design wind load), it would yield/buckle at the 137' elevation. The yielded section would result in a maximum 58' fall radius, but would most likely remain connected and hang from the standing section. The structure has been designed with all of the applicable factors as required by the code. A properly designed, constructed and maintained pole has never collapsed; monopoles are safe structures with a long history of reliable operation. I hope this review of the monopole design has given you a greater degree of comfort regarding the design capacity inherent in pole structures. If you have any additional questions please call me at 614-398-6250 or email mike@mfpeng.com. Michael F. Plahovinsak, P.E. Sole Proprietor - Independent Engineer P.E. Licensed in 48 Jurisdictions 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 370Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 371Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 1 6NC1028E Naples Immokalee Road Crown Monopole Wireless Telecommunication Facility Radio Frequency (RF) Coverage Analysis Last Updated 01/29/2019 Revision Number V0.1 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) RF Engineering Review Page 2 1/29/2019 Table of Contents Current Coverage and Coverage Change Due to Tower Decommissioning .......................................................................................... 3 Coverage Footprint: Local Population and Emergency Calls ................................................................................................................ 4 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) RF Engineering Review Page 3 1/29/2019 Current Coverage and Coverage Change Due to Tower Decommissioning Figure 1: Existing Service In 2001, T‐Mobile launched 2G service (as Voicestream) at the Crown monopole tower located at the intersection of Immokalee Rd and Bellaire Bay Dr in Naples. The antennas on this one‐hundred‐ ninety‐foot tower were mounted at one‐hundred‐eighty‐one feet and provided a roughly contiguous three‐hundred‐sixty‐degree coverage footprint for a 2‐3 mile radius. Since that time, there have been various technology upgrades including ongoing enhancements to 3G and 4G deployments. Today the service footprint for this facility covers the residential communities to the north and south as well as acting as a transition or handover site for users traveling east to west along Immokalee Rd. In particular, the entire communities of The Quarry, Heritage Bay and Esplanade would have little to no usable signal levels without this facility broadcasting cellular service. In figure one, signal levels are represented by the shaded magenta areas around the cell towers. (green dots) Darker colors represent better signal levels. In areas of dark magenta, a user would have relatively good quality signal levels. The ability to make and receive calls or stream data indoors is better guaranteed. Areas with lighter shades of magenta indicate service levels that may not support all services indoors or during network busy hours. The lightest shaded areas would have Figure 2: Service without Crown Tower poor service with the worst‐case scenario being where a user could not place a call at all. In figure two, a propagation map shows the predicted service levels without the T‐Mobile facility located at the Crown tower in operation. Whereas most of the residential neighborhoods to the north had good coverage before, service has dropped to “fair” levels for the entire area. To the west in the Esplanade community, service levels have dropped from fair to poor, the consequences of which include the possibility that home owners may no longer be able to use their phones inside their house. In addition, Immokalee RD would have compromised service levels from approximately Rose Blvd in the west to Rock Rd in the east. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) RF Engineering Review Page 4 1/29/2019 Coverage Footprint: Local Population and Emergency Calls * ‐ In the event a user places an emergency call in an area where their own provider does not have usable service levels, the phone will automatically be connected to any other provider with strong enough cellular service levels The impact of decommissioning an active cell tower in a community can be better understood by looking at one of the most critical aspects of cell phone use: the ability to contact emergency services. In the above propagation maps, the general service levels are shown as a green shade. The coverage footprint for the T‐Mobile facility at the Crown tower is indicated by the darker green area. This service envelope, an approximately 12 square mile area covers close to ten‐thousand residents. (based on the last available 2010 census data, it is most likely this number is higher due to the more recent, extensive development in the area) In figure three, the coverage footprint is superimposed against the population data while in figure four the locations of E911 calls over a thirty‐day period within the coverage footprint are mapped. Within the service area of the T‐Mobile facility at the Crown tower there were fifty‐one emergency calls placed between December twenty‐three of last year to January twenty‐three of this year. One of these calls lasted for over thirteen minutes. With an estimated seventy percent of E911 calls being placed from wireless phones, the requirement for robust, uninterrupted cell phone service becomes more critical than before. The decommissioning of this facility without a replacement could potentially jeopardize public safety due to a lack of wireless services. * Figure 3: Coverage Footprint and Population Figure 4: Coverage Footprint and E911 calls (12/23/18‐ 01/23/19) E911 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) ORDINANCE NO 020 7 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 8627N AND BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM PUD TO PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS RICHLAND PUD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF IMMOKALEE ROAD CR 846 AND COLLIER BOULEVARD CR 951 IN SECTION 27 TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH RANGE 26 EAST COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 150 ACRES PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 9727 THE FORMER RICHLAND PUD AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS Karen Bishop of PMS Inc of Naples representing Kenco Development Inc petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County Florida SECTION ONE The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property located in Section 27 Township 48 South Range 26 East Collier County Florida is changed from PUD to PUD Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD Document attached hereto as Exhibit A which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 8627N as described in Ordinance Number 91102 the Collier County Land Development Code are hereby amended accordingly SECTION TWO Ordinance Number 9727 known as the Richland PUD adopted on June 10 1997 by the Board of County Commissioners of C611ier County is hereby repealed in its entirety SECTION THREE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) PASSED AND D ULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County Florida thisa day of GHTERK Clerk Att 1 pprovea as to Fo d Legal Sufficiency MarjorOVl Student Assistant County Attorney PUDA2001 A R 1494CBlo 2002 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA JAMES N COLETTA Chairman This ordinance filed with te Secrqtary of totes Office the ay and acknowledgemnt of at filin received sof 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT FOR RICHLAND A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY Prepared by PMS Inc of Naples 2335 Tamiami Trail N ff408 Naples Florida 34103 Date Reviewed by CCPC Date Approved by BCC Ordinance Number Ordinance Number Document Date 11702212o2 200207 12402 Exibit 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SHORT TITLE SECTION I SECTION II SECTION III SECTION IV SECTION V SECTION VI Legal Description Property Ownership and General Description Project Development Residential District Community Commercial District Reserve District General Development Commitments 11 21 31 41 51 61 LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B TABLE 1 PUD Master Plan Conceptual Buffer Plan Development Standards for R Residential Areas 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The purpose of this section is to express the intent of Kenco Development Inc hereinaf ter referred to as the Developer to create a Planned Unit Development PUD on 150 acres of land located in Section 27 Township 48 South Range 26 East Collier CountyFloridaThenameofthisPlannedUnitDevelopmentshallbeRichlandThedevelopmentofRichlandwillbeincompliancewiththeplanninggoalsandobjectivesofCollierCounty as set forth in the Growth Management Plan The development will be consistent with the growth policies and land development regulations adopted thereunder of the Future Land Use Element and map of the Growth Management Plan and other applicable regulationsforthefollowingreasons The subject property is within the Urban Mixed Use DistrictUrban Residential Sub district and the Activity Center Mixed Use DistrictActivity Center Subdistrict as iden tified on the Future Land Use Map as required in Objective 1 of the Future Land Use Element FLUE The proposed density of Richland is 31 dwelling units per acre which is less than the maximum density permitted by the FLUE Density Rating System and is therefore consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 51 The entire subject property qualifies for a base density of four dwelling units per acre Certain parts of the subject property lie within a one mile radius of an activity center qualifying the area for an additional 3 dwelling units per acre while an additional dwelling unit per acre is available because the project fronts on two arterial streets Richland is compatible with and complementary to existing and future surroundinglandusesasrequiredinPolicy54oftheFutureLandUseElement Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable land development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element The development of Richland will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required in Policies 31 H and L of the Future Land Use Element Richland is planned to incorporate natural systems for water management inaccor dance with their natural functions and capabilities as may be required by Objective15oftheDrainageSubElementofthePublicFacilitiesElement The project will be served by a complete range of services and utilities as approvedbytheCounty 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) o The subject property includes an Activity Center Designation which is a preferred location for commercial and mixeduse developments The project shall be in compliance with all applicable County regulations including the Growth Management Plan SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known and cited as the RICHLAND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE iii 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) SECTION 1 11 12 13 14 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPERTY OWNERSHIP and GENERAL DESCRIPTION PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the legal description and ownership of Richland and to describe the existing condition of the property to be developed LEGAL DESCRIPTION The northeast 14 of Section 27 Township 48 South Range 26 East less the East and North 100 feet for the purpose of road rightofway located in Collier CountyFlorida TITLE TO PROPERTY The Property is currently under the ownership of Kenco Development Inc 8610 Pebblebrooke Drive Naples Florida 34119 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The project site is located in Section 27 Township 48 South Range 26 East and is bordered on the north by Immokalee Road CR846 on the east byCR951onthesouthbyOakridgeMiddleSchoolandonthewestby undeveloped agricultural land and Laurel Oak Elementary School The zoning classification of the subject property as of this submittal is PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The sites vegetation includes pine flatwoods saw palmetto slash pine and sabal palm It also contains areas of cypress fern and sawgrass Soils on the site are Immokalee fine sand and Arzell fine sand A small area of pompano fine sand is located in the southeast corner of the site Do The surrounding area is generally undeveloped and is located within the Activity Center Designation and Residential Density Band of the Future Land Use Map to the Growth Management Plan Elevations in the area range from 130 150 feet according to USGS quadrangle maps The site is outside of the flood plane and requiresdevelopmenttobesited18inchesabovethecrownoftheroadaccording to flood insurance rate maps 11 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 15 PROJECT DENSITY Ao The total acreage of Richland is approximately 150 acres The maximum number of dwelling units to be built on the total acreage is 400Thenumberofdwellingunitspergrossresidentialacreisapproximately31 units The density on individual parcels of land throughout the project may varyaccordingtothetypeofhousingplacedoneachparcelofland Commercial uses occupy approximately 23 acres These described land uses are set forth on the PUD Master Plan Exhibit A At all times property included within the Richland PUD shall be included in determining project density including property reserved or dedicated for public uses such as but not limited to public roadways easements reserves and landscape buffers 12 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) SECTION II 21 22 PURPOSE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT The purpose of this Section is to generally describe the plan of development for Richland and to identify relationships to applicable County ordinances policies and procedures GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES Bo Richland a private community will include a broad range of Singlefamily Multifamily Community Commercial HotelMotel Stormwater Management Open Space and Reserve areas Each singlefamily multifamily and commercial parcel will be served with publicly provided utilities including potable water sewer and electricity Amenities proposed to be provided in the project include but are not limited to structures designed to provide social and recreational space lakes natural and landscaped open spaces The Master Plan is illustrated graphically on Exhibit A A land use summary indicating approximate land use acreages is shown on the plan The location size and configuration of individual tracts shall be determined at the time of Preliminary Subdivision Plat approval with minor adjustments at the time of Final Plat Approval in accordance with Article 3 Division 32 Section 329 of the Collier County Land Development Code 23 GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY ORDINANCES Regulations for development of Richland shall be in accordance with the contents of this PUD ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code to the extent they are not inconsistent with this PUD ordinance and Growth Management Plan which are in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate which authorizes the construction of improvements such as but not limited to Final Subdivision Plat Final Site Development Plan and Excavation Permit Where this PUD ordinance fails to provide developmental standards then the provisions of the most similar zoning district or section of the Collier County Land Development Code shall apply 21 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 24 Bo Unless otherwise defined herein the definitions of all terms shall bethesameasthedefinitionssetforthintheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCodeineffectatthetimeofdevelopmentorderapplication Development permitted by the approval of this PUD will be subject to a concurrency review under the Adequate Public Facilities OrdinanceArticle3Division315oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode Unless modified waived or excepted by this PUD or by subsequentrequeststheprovisionsofotherapplicablelanddevelopmentcodesremainineffectwithrespecttothedevelopmentofthelandwhichcomprisesthisPUD Eo All conditions imposed herein or as represented on the RichlandMasterPlanarepartoftheregulationswhichgovernthemanner inwhichthelandmaybedeveloped LAND USE The Master Development Plan Exhibit A shows proposed land uses ofdevelopmentforeachparcelMinorvariationsinacreageshallbepermitted atfinaldesigntoaccommodatevegetationencroachmentsutilitiesmarketconditionsandotherheretounforeseensiteconditions LAND USE TYPE LAND USE SCHEDULE RESIDENTIAL open space reserve water management lakes COMMERCIAL open space reserve water management lakes ACREAGF 127 23 TOTAL 150 22 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 25 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL The provisions of Article 3 Division 33 of the Collier County Land DevelopmentCodeshallapplytothedevelopmentofplattedtractsorparcelsoflandpriortothe issuance of a building permit or other development order 26 RESUBDIVISION Resubdivision shall comply with Section 3275 of the Collier County Land Development Code 27 EASEMENTS FOR UTILITIES Easements shall be provided for water management areas utilities and other purposes as may be needed Said easements and improvements shall be done in compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code All necessary easements dedications or other instruments shall be grantedtoinsurethecontinuedoperationandmaintenanceofallserviceutilitiesin compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time approvals are requested 28 MODEL HOMES Model Homes and Model Home Sales Centers shall be permitted as provided for inSection26334oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode 29 USE OF RIGHTSOFWAY Utilization of lands within all project rightsofway for landscaping decorative entrance ways and signage may be allowed subject to review and administrative approval by the Collier County Planning Services Director for engineering andsafetyconsiderationsduringthedevelopmentreviewprocessandpriortoanybuildingpermits 210 AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN Amendments may be made to the PUD as provided in Article 2 Division 27Section2735oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode 23 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 211 212 213 214 215 LIMITATIONS OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL This PUD is subject to the sunsetting provisions as provided for within Article 2Division27Section2734oftheCollierCountyDevelopmentCode PUD MONITORING An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Article 2 Division 27Section2736oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES The Developer shall create appropriate property owner associationswhich will be responsible for maintaining the roads streets drainage common areas and water and sewer improvements where such systems are not dedicated to the County OFFSTREET PARKING AND LOADING All offstreet parking and loading facilities shall be designed in accordance withDivision23oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS A minimum of thirty percent 30 of the projects gross area shall be devoted to open space pursuant to Article 2 Division 26 Section 2632 of the Collier County Land Development Code The total project is 150 acres requiring a minimum of 45 acres to be retained as open space throughout the Richland PUD This requirement shall not apply to individual development parcels Of the projectstotal 150 acres the following acreages represent 30 ofthetotalsiteallcontributingtoopenspace Lake 11 acres Reserve 31 acres Buffer 7 acres TOTAL 48 acres of open space 24 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 216 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS Pursuant to Article 3 Division 39 Section 39553 of the Collier County Land Development Code 25 of the viable naturally functioning native vegetation on site shall be retained 217 POLLING PLACES Pursuant to Article 3 Division 32 Section 328314 of the Collier County Land Development Code accommodation shall be made for the future use of building space within common areas for the purposes of accommodating the function of an electoral polling place 218 SIGNS Signs shall be in accordance with Article 2 Division 25 of the Collier County Land Development Code 219 LANDSCAPING Landscaping shall be in accordance with Article 2 Divisions 24 and 28 of the Collier County Land Development Code as amended In addition a 30foot TypeBBuffershallbeprovidedalongthetractboundarylineseparatingthecommercial and residential land use tracts See Exhibit B This buffer shall contain a 6foot tall precast concrete wall along the entire buffer 220 LAKE SETBACK AND EXCAVATION The lake setback requirements described in Article 3 Division 35 Section 3571oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCodemaybereducedwiththeadministrativeapprovaloftheCollierCountyPlanningServicesDirectorAlllakes greater than two 2 acres may be excavated to the maximum commercial excava tion depths set forth in Section 35731 however removal of fill from Richland shall be limited to an amount up to 10 percent per lake to a maximum of 20000cubicyardsofthetotalvolumeexcavatedunlessacommercialexcavationpermitisreceived 221 EXCAVATION AND VEGETATION REMOVAL Improvement of property shall be prohibited prior to issuance of building permit Nositeworkremovalofprotectedvegetationgradingimprovementofpropertyor construction of any type may be commenced prior to the issuance of a buildingpermitwherethedevelopmentproposedrequiresabuildingpermitundertheLandDevelopmentCodeorotherapplicableCountyregulations 25 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Exceptions to this requirement may be granted by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator for an approved Subdivision or Site De velopment Plan to provide for distribution of fill excavated on site or to permit con struction of an approved water management system to minimize stockpiles and hauling offsite or to protect the public health safety and welfare where clearinggradingandfillingplanshavebeensubmittedandapprovedmeetingthestandards of Section 32836 of the Code Removal of exotic vegetation shall be exempted upon receipt of a vegetation removal permit for exotics pursuant to Division 39 of the Land Development Code 222 SUBDIVISIONS Subdivisions shall be in accordance with Article 3 Division 32 of the Collier County Land Development Code 26 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) RESIDENTIAL 31 32 33 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to identify permitted uses and developmentstandardsforareaswithintheRichlandPUDdesignatedontheMasterPlanExhibitAasRResidential MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS A maximum number of 400 residential dwelling units may be constructed on landsdesignatedR GENERAL DESCRIPTION Ao Areas designated as R on the Master Land Use Plan are designated to accommodate a full range of residential dwelling unit types Approximate acreage of land use tracts have been indicated on the PUDMasterPlaninordertoindicaterelativesizeanddistributionofthe residential uses These acreages are based on conceptual designs and must be considered to be approximate Actual acreage of all developmenttractswillbeprovidedatthetimeofpermittingResidentialtractsare designed to accommodate internal roadways Co Singlefamily lot sizes and development regulations shall be in accordancewithTable1ofthissectionandshallbeidentifiedbytheDeveloperatthetimeofPreliminarySubdivisionPlatapprovalpursuanttoCollierCountyZoningRegulationssetforthinDivision32oftheCollierCountyLand Development Code Multifamily uses and development regulations shall be in accordance with Table 1 of this section and shall be identified by the Developer at the time ofSiteDevelopmentPlanapprovalpursuanttoSection25ofthisdocumentandapplicableCollierCountyRegulationssetforthinDivision33oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode 31 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 34 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES 35 No building or structure or part thereof shall be erected altered or used or land or water used in whole or in part for other than the following A Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Singlefamily detached dwelling units Singlefamily attached and townhouse units Singlefamily zero lot line dwelling units Duplex dwelling units Multifamily dwelling units Nursing rest homes and adult congregate living facilities Recreational facilities including but not limited to parks playgrounds commonly owned open space pools tennis courts communitybuildingsguardhousesessentialservicesandutilitystructures Model homes sales centers and temporary developmentconstruction offices shall be permitted in conjunction with the promotion of the development Water management facilities and lakes Any other use which is in comparable in nature with the foregoing uses which the Planning Services Director determines to be compatible in the R district B Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures 1 Customary accessory uses and structures including but not limited to covered parking attached and detached garages and swimmingpools 2 Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Planning Services Director determines to be compatible in the R District PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Except as provided in Section 25B property development regulations forlandusesintheRResidentialDistrictaresetforthinTable1 Site development standards for categories 14 uses apply to individual residential lot boundaries Category 5 standards apply to platted parcelboundaries 32 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Co Eo Fo Go Unless otherwise indicated required yards heights and floor area standards apply to principal structures Development standards for building relationships set forth in Table 1 shall be established during site development plan approval as set forth in Article 3 Division 33 of the Collier County Land Development Code in accordance with those standards of the zoning district which is most similar to the proposed use In the case of residential structures with a common architectural theme required property development regulations may be waived or reduced as provided by the provisions in Article 2 Division 26 Section 262746of the Collier County Land Development Code Common open spacerequirementsaredeemedsatisfiedpursuanttoSection216ofthis PUD Offstreet parking required for multifamily uses shall be accessed byparkingaislesordrivewayswhichareseparatefromanyroadswhich serve more than one development A green space area of not less that ten feet 10 in width as measured from pavement edge to pavement edge shall separate any parking aisle or driveway from any abutting road Singlefamily zero lot line dwellings units are identified separately from singlefamily detached dwelling units with conventional side yardrequirementstodistinguishthesetypesforthepurposeofapplyingdevelopmentstandardsunderTable1Zerolotlinedwellingsshall be defined as any type of detached singlefamily structure employing a zero or reduced side yard as set forth herein and which conform to requirements ofCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCodeArticle2Division26Subsection 2627441 through 3 No housing structure containing three 3 or more dwelling units may be located between two detached single family structures which are less than 300 feet apart if they are a part of the same platted block Approval of the location of multiple family structures relative to existing single familydetachedstructuresshallrestwiththeDevelopmentServicesDirector and shall be determined at the time of Site Development Plan preapplicationmeetings No nursing rest homes and adult congregate living facility shall be located within three hundred 300 feet of any single family detached or attached dwelling units Generally multiple family dwelling structures with dwellingunitsabovedwellingunitsshallactasatransitionareabetweennursingresthomesadultcongregatelivingfacilitiesandsinglefamilydetachedand attached dwelling units 33 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) TABLE 1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR R RESIDENTIAL AREAS SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE ZERO SINGLE FAMILY FAMILY LOT ATTACHED AND DETACHED LINE DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE Category 1 2 3 4 Minimum Lot Area 5500 SF 5000 SF 3500 SF 3000 SF Minimum Lot 55 50 35 30Width5 Front Yard 20 3 20 3 20 3 20 3 Front Yard for Side 10 10 10 10EntryGarage Side Yard 5 6 0 or 75 0 or 5 BH Rear Yard Principal 20 10 20 20 Rear Yard Aces 10 5 10 10 sory Rear Yard 1 10 5 10 10 Maximum Building 35 35 35 35Height2 Distance Between 10 10 0 or 15 5 SBHPrincipalStructures Floor Area Min 1200 SF 1200 SF 1200 SF 1200 SFs MULTI FAMILY DWELLINGS 5 1 AC 150 25 15 05 BH BH 15 5 BH 35 5 SBH 1000 SF BH Building Height SBH Sum of Building Height Combined height of two adjacent buildings for the purposes of detsnnlnlng setback requirements All distances are In feet unless otherwise noted 1 Rear yards setbacks for principal and accessory structures on lots that abut preserves shall be in accordancewith Section 328473ofthe LDC as amended Front yards shall be measured as follows A If the parcel Is served by a public rightofwaysetback la measured from the adjacent rightofwaylineBIftheparcelisservedbyaprivateroadsetbacklemeasuredfromthebackofcurbIfcurbedoredgeof pavement Ifnot curbed 2 Building height shall be the vertical distance measured from the flret habltsble finished floor elevation to the uppermost finished ceiling elevation of the sbucture 3 Singlefamily dwellings which provide for 2 parking spaces within an encloeed garage and provide for guest parking other than In private ddvewaya may reduce thefrontyardrequirementto5forthegarageand15fortheremainingstructures 4 Each halfof aduplex unit requires a lot area allocation of 3500SF for atotal minimum lot area of 7000SF 3000square feet lot area allocation per dwelling unit forsinglefamilyattachedandtownhousedwellinguniteand3000squarefeetperdwellingunitforelngletamllyattachedandtownhouaedwellingunits Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20 for culdesaclots provided minimum lot area requirement Is still maintained 6 Zero feet 0or a minimum of five feet 5on either side except that where the zero foot 0yard option is utilized the oppositesideofthestructureshallhaveatenfoot10yardZerofoot03yardsnybeusedonbothsidesofastructureprovidedthattheoppositetenfoot10 yardisprovided 34 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) SECTION IV COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 41 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to identify permitted uses and developmentstandardsforareaswithinRichlanddesignatedontheMasterPlanExhibit A asCCommunityCommercial 42 MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ACREAGE A maximum of 231000 square feet gross floor area of Community Commercial uses may be constructed on lands designated C on the Master Plan Exhibit ATheCommunityCommercialtractislimitedtoamaximumof23acres 43 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as C on the Master Plan are designed to accommodate a full range of commercial uses hotelmotel essential services and customary accessory uses The approximate acreage of the C district is indicated on the Master PlanThisacreageisbasedonconceptualdesignsandisapproximateActual acreages of all development tracts will be provided at the time of SiteDevelopmentPlanorPreliminarySubdivisionPlatapprovalsinaccordancewithArticle3Division32andDivision33respectivelyoftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCodeCommunityCommercialtractsaredesignedtoaccommodateinternalroadwaysopenspaceslakeswater management facilities and other similar uses 44 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure or part thereof shall be erected altered or used or landusedinwholeorinpartforotherthanthefollowing A Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1 2 3 4 Agricultural Services Group 0742 except no outside kennelingAmusementandRecreationServicesIndooronlyGroups7911794179917993 Apparel and Accessory Stores Groups 56115621 56315641565156615699 Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations Groups 551155315541 41 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 5 6 7 8 9 lO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Automotive Repair Services and Parking Group 7542BuildingMaterialsHardwareGardenSupplywithnooutside storage or display Groups 52315251 5261 Business Services Groups 73117323 7334 7335 7336 733873527371737973847389 Communications Groups 4832 4833 Depository Institutions Groups 60116099EatingandDrinkingPlacesGroups5812 Engineering Accounting and Management 87118721 8741 87428748 Food Stores Groups 5411 54215441 5451 5461 5499GeneralMerchandiseStoresGroups531153315399HealthServicesGroups80118049 Home Furniture Furnishings and Equipment Stores Groups 571257135714571957225731573457355736HotelsandMotelsGroup7011 Insurance Agents Brokers and Service Group 6411MembershipOrganizationsGroups86418661MiscellaneousRepairServicesGroups762276297631MiscellaneousRetailGroups59125921593259415949 599259935999 Motion Pictures Groups 7832 Museum Art Galleries Group 8412NonDepositoryCreditInstitutionsGroups 61416159 6162 6163PersonalServicesGroups721172127215721972217231724172517291 Real Estate Groups 6531 65416552SocialServicesGroup8351 45 ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES A Uses and Structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoingusesandwhichthePlanningServicesDirectordeterminestobe compatible 42 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 46 Development Standards A Minimum lot area Ten thousand 10000 square feet B Minimum lot width One hundred 100 feet Minimum yard requirements 1 Front yard twentyfive 25 feet 2 Side yard zero or ten 0 or 10 feet 3 Rear yard twenty 20 feet Distance between principal structures One half the sum of walls oppositeoneanotherbutnotlessthanten10feet Eo Minimum floor area of principal structure seven hundred and fifty square feet 750 per building on the ground floor Landscaping and OffStreet Parking shall be in accordance with theCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCodeAllparkinglotlightingshall be Iowintensityandshieldedfromresidentialareas G Maximum height fifty feet 50 and not to exceed two stories for commercial structures within 60 feet of the residential tract boundary line H General application for Setbacks Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following 1 2 3 If the parcel is served by a public or private rightofway setback is measured from the adjacent rightofway line If the parcel is served by a nonplatted private drive setback ismeasuredfromthebackofcurboredgeofpavementIftheparcelisservedbyaplattedprivatedrivesetbackismeasuredfromtheroadeasementorpropertyline Maximum density of HotelMotel lodging facilities 1 The net platted density of hotel rooms per acre may not exceedtwentysix26unitsperacre Jo Commercial trash dumpsters shall be located or placed within 100 feet of any residential tract boundary line 43 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) SECTION V RESERVE DISTRICT 51 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and developmentstandardsforareaswithinRichlanddesignatedontheMasterPlanExhibit A asReserve 52 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as Reserve on the PUD Master Plan are designed to accommodate a full range of conservation and limited water management uses andfunctionsTheprimarypurposeoftheReserveDistrictistoretainviablenaturallyfunctioningwetlandsystemstoallowfortherestorationandenhancementof impacted or degraded wetland systems and to provide an open space amenity fortheenjoymentofRichlandresidents 53 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure or part thereof shall be erected altered or used or land or water used in whole or in part for other than the following A Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1 Passive recreational areas boardwalks and recreational shelters 2 Nature trails excluding asphalt paved surfaces 3 Water management facilities structures and lake bulkheads or other architectural treatments 4 Mitigation areas 5 Any other conservation and related open space activity or use whichiscomparableinnaturewiththeforegoingusesandwhichthe Planning Services Director determines to be compatible in the Reserve District 51 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 54 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS All setbacks from preserve areas shall be in accordance with Section 328473 of the LDC as amended 55 RESERVE DISTRICT CONSERVATION EASEMENT A nonexclusive conservation easement or tract is required by Collier County LandDevelopmentCodeSection328473forpreservationlandsincludedintheReserveDistrictInadditiontoCollierCountyaconservationeasementmayalsoberequiredbyotherregulatoryagencieswithjurisdictionoverReserveDistrictlandsInadditiontocomplyingwithprovisionsoftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCodesaideasementshallbeprovidedinaccordancewiththetermssetforthintheapplicablepermitgrantedbysaidagenciesTheRichlandCommonsAssociationshallberesponsibleforcontrolandmaintenanceoflandswithintheReserveDistrict 52 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTR 61PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to set forth the standards for development of the project 62 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the final site development plans the final subdivision plats and all applicable state and local laws codes and regulations relating to the subdivision of the land except whenspecificallynotedorotherwisesetforthinthisdocumentorasotherwiseapprovedbyCollierCountyAllstateandfederalpermitsshallbeeffectiveaccordingtothestipulationsandconditionsofthepermittingagenciesFinalmasterplansfinalsitedevelopmentplansorfinalsubdivisionplatsandstandardsandspecificationsof the Collier County Land Development Code relating to the same shall apply to thisprojectexceptasotherwisesetforthherein 63 PUD MASTER PLAN Ao The Master Plan Exhibit A is an illustrative preliminary development planThedesignelementsandlayoutillustratedontheMasterPlanshallbe understood to be flexible so that the final design may satisfy the Developerscriteria and comply with all applicable requirements of thisordinance The Planning Services Director shall be authorized to approve minor changes and refinements to the Richland Master Plan upon written requestoftheDeveloper C The following limitations shall apply to such requests 1 The minor change or refinement shall be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Richland PUD document 2 The minor change or refinement shall not constitute a substantial change pursuant to Article 2 Division 27 Subsection 27352 of the Collier County Land Development Code 61 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 3 The minor change or refinement shall be compatible with adjacentlandusesandshallnotcreatedetrimentalimpactstoabuttingland uses water management facilities and Reserve areas within or external to the PUD Do All necessary easements dedications or other instruments shall be granted to ensure the continuance operation and maintenance of all service utilities Eo Agreements provisions or covenants which govern the use maintenance and continued protection of the PUD and common areas will be provided 64 DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS A TRANSPORTATION 1 When deemed warranted by the County the Developer shall providefifty50feetofadditionalroadrightofwayalongthesouthsideof Immokalee Road in accordance with the procedures and standards ofSubsection222037oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode Road Impact Fee credits will be allowed for this rightofway to the maximum extent provided in the Road Impact Fee Ordinance and in accordance with the approved conversion formula 2 When deemed warranted by the County the Developer shall provideleftandrightturnlanesatallprojectaccessesonbothImmokalee Road and CR951 If median openings are permitted upon the four laning of either road the Developer shall be responsible for the cost of all intersection modifications needed to serve project accesses 3 The Developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of traffic signals at any project access when deemed war ranted by the County The signals will be owned operated and main tained by Collier County 4 When deemed warranted by the County the Developer shall providearteriallevelstreetlightingatallprojectaccesses 5 The road impact fee shall be as provided by Ordinance Number 01 13 or as may be amended and shall be paid at the time building permitsareissuedunlessotherwiseapprovedbytheBoardofCountyCommissioners 6 Access improvements shall not be subject to impact fee credits andexcludingtrafficsignalsshallbeinplacebeforeanycertificatesof occupancy are issued 62 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 7 8 9 All traffic control devices used excluding street name signs shall conform with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as required in Chapter 3160747 Florida Statutes The commercial tract shall provide an internal vehicular cross access to the residential tract Sidewalks shall be provided on one side of the interconnect road A metal security gate shall be placed on the com mercial tract to allow for the stacking of a minimum of three vehicles on the commercial tract Gate maintenance shall be the responsibilityofthecommercialpropertyownersandortheirpropertyowners association No construction traffic shall use this interconnectio Access locations to Immokalee Road and to Collier Boulevard are conceptual and subject to review and approval at final site plansubmittalconsistentwiththeAccessControlPolicyResolution01242asmaybeamendedandtheCollierCountyConstruction Standards Handbook for Work Within the Public RightofWayOrdinance9364asmaybeamendedAllaccessandmedianlocationsaresubjecttomodificationandorclosureatthediscretionofCollierCountybasedonsafetyoperationorcapacityreasons B WATER MANAGEMENT 1 2 3 Excavation permits will be required for the proposed lakes in accordance with Division 35 of the Collier County Land DevelopmentCodeasamendedExcavatedmaterialfromthepropertyisintended to be used within the project site 4 The Developer shall be responsible for the installation of properlysizedculvertsattheproposedentranceroadlocationsplacedontherelocatedswalecenterlineatsuchtimeasdrivewaysareinstalled Detailed paving grading and site drainage plans shall be submitted to Engineering Review Services for review No construction permitsshallbeissuedunlessanduntilapprovaloftheproposed construction in accordance with the submitted plans is granted byEngineeringReviewServices In accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water ManagementDistrictChapters40E4and40E40thisprojectshallbedesignedforastormeventof3daydurationand25yearfrequency 63 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) C 5 Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with the appropriate provisions of Division 32 of theCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode UTILITIES 1 2 3 4 Water Distribution sewage collection and transmission and interim water andor sewage treatment facilities to serve the project are to bedesignedconstructedconveyedownedandmaintainedin accordance with Collier County Ordinance No 9717 as amendedandotherapplicableCountyrulesandregulations 5 All customers connecting to the water distribution and sewagecollectionfacilitiestobeconstructedwillbecustomersoftheCountyandwillbebilledbytheCountyinaccordancewiththeCountysestablishedratesShouldtheCountynotbeinapositiontoprovidewaterandorsewerservicetotheprojectthewaterandorsewer customers shall be customers of the interim utility established to serve the project until the Countysoffsite water andor sewerfacilitiesareavailabletoservetheproject It is anticipated that the County Utilities Division will ultimatelysupplypotablewatertomeettheconsumptivedemandandor receive and treat the sewage generated by this project Should the County system not be in a position to supply potable water to theprojectandorreceivetheprojectswastewateratthetime development commences the Developer at its expense will install and operate interim water supply and onsite treatment facilitiesandorinterimonsitesewagetreatmentanddisposalfacilities adequate to meet all requirements of the appropriate regulatoryagenciesAnagreementshallbeenteredintobetweentheCountyandtheDeveloperbindingontheDeveloperhisassignsor successors regarding any interim treatment facilities to be utilized The agreement must be legally sufficient to the County prior to theapprovalofconstructiondocumentsfortheprojectandbein conformance with Collier County Ordinance No 9717 as amended If an interim onsite water supply treatment and transmission facility isutilizedtoservetheprojectitmustbeproperlysizedtosupplyaveragepeakdaydomesticdemandinadditiontofireflowdemand at a rate approved by the appropriate Fire Control District servicingtheprojectarea Public Service Commission Territories Prior to approval of constructiondocumentsbytheCountytheDevelopermlstpresentverificationpursuanttoChapter367Florida 64 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) D 2 3 4 Statutes that the Florida Public Service Commission has grantedterritorialrightstotheDevelopertoprovidesewerandorwaterservice to the project until the County can provide these services through its water and sewer facilities ENVIRONMENTAL 1 Petitioner shall be subject to Division 39 of the Collier CountyLandDevelopmentCoderequiringtheacquisitionofatree removal permit prior to any land clearing A site clearing planshallbesubmittedtotheCommunityDevelopmentand Environmental Services Administrator for review and approvalpriortoanysubstantialworkonthesiteThisplanmaybe submitted in phases to coincide with the development schedule The site clearing plan shall clearly depict how the final site layout incorporates retained native vegetation to the maximum extent possible and how roads buildings lakes parking lots and other facilities have been oriented to accommodate this goal All exotic plants as defined in the Land Development Code shall be removed during each phase of construction from development areas open space areas and preserve areas Following site development a maintenance program shall be implemented to prevent reinvasionofthesitebysuchexoticspeciesThisplanwhichwilldescribe control techniques and inspection intervals shall be filed with and approved by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator If during the course of site clearing excavation or other constructional activities an archaeological or historical site artifact or other indicatorisdiscoveredalldevelopmentatthatlocationshallbeimmediatelystoppedandtheCodeEnforcementDepartmentshallbenotified Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to en able the Code Enforcement Department or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action in regard to its salvageability The Code Enforcement Department will respond to any such notification in a timely and efficient manner so as to provideonlyaminimalinterruptiontoanyconstructionalactivities Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the state ofFloridaEnvironmentalResourcePermitrulesandbesubjecttoreviewandapprovalbyCurrentPlanningEnvironmentalReviewStaff 65 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) Removal of exotic vegetation shall not be counted towards mitigationforimpactstoCollierCountyjurisdictionalwetlands 5 This PUD shall be in compliance with Division 311 of the LDC as amended which provides protection for Endangered Threatened and Listed Species E SUBSTITUTIONS TO COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS 1 Section 328319 Street name signs shall be approved bytheCountyEngineerbutneednotmeetUSDOTFHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Street pavementpaintingstripingandreflectiveedgingrequirementsshallbe subject to the County Engineersapproval but need not meet standard county requirements 2 Section 3284165 Street rightsofway and crosssections for the roads shall be as designated by developer at time of final construction plans 3 Section 3284166 The 1000 feet maximum deadend street lengthrequirementshallbewaived 4 Section 3284168 Back of curb radii may be reduced to thirty 30feetatlocalintersections 5 Section 32841610 The requirement for one hundred 100feettangentsectionsbetweenreversecurvesofstreetsshallbewaived 6 Section 328421 The requirement for blank utility casings shall be subject to County engineering approval but need not meet standard County requirements F MISCELLANEOUS 1 Access to the project shall be restricted to those access pointsshownonExhibitA 66 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) I N Ad o ov LEGEND WE o00 RIDENLCLUDING ES 79 S SCALE 1 400 RERDRHTOFWAY 6ACcPRECTACCSToCPUDMASTERPLANEXHIBITAVasseDa1orooto1o1 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 406Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I DWIGHT E BROCK Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Collier County Florida hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corre copy of ORDINANCE 200207 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 12th day of February 2002 during Regular Session WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County Florida this 19th day of February 2002 DWIGHT E BROCKpClerkofCourts Exofficio to B6a County Commissiet By Ellie Hof fman Deputy Clerk 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 409Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Attachment B- Backup Materials (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) stc N Pos'It N(; I NS't'Rtr(11't0Ns (('l In I''l'l:lt lt. COLl.ll;R ('Ot lN l'\' n I)MlNlS'l'lt^'l'lVli C'ODIi IrOR Ln Nt) I)l-lVl;l.Ol'}lvllrNl') (irdc. Chaptcr' 8 l:. l. 'l'hc sign(s) rnust bc ct'cctcd in lull vicrv ol'the public. not nrorc lhan llvc (5) l'cet lionr thc nearest street right-of'-rvay or eascltlcnt. sccurcly to a post. or otlrcr structurc. 'l'hc si-en nla)' not bc allixcd lo a tt'cc or other lbliagc. 3. -fhc pctitioncr or thc pctitioncr's agcrlt nrust nlaintain thc sign(s) in placc. and rcadablc condition until the requcsted action has bcerr hcald and a linal dccisiott rcndctctl. Il'thc sign(s) is clcstroyccl. Iost. or rcndclcd r.rnrcadablc. the pctitioncl or the petitioner''s agcnt nrust rcplace thc sign(s NOTE: AFTER TIIE SIGN llAS BIiEN POSTED, Tllls AFFIDAVIT OF POSTINC NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER TTIAN ]'EN (IO) }VORKING DAYS BEFORE TI{E ITIRST TIEARING DATE TO 'TIIE ASSIGNE,D PLANNER. n Ijt:tDn vt't'ol; Pos'l'tN(; No'l'tcti s I'A't'ti otj Ijl.oRll)n cot JN't'Y olj cot.t.l tiR IltiF0tili'l I Itr LjNDlrltslcNtiD n tJ I ilot{t'l'y. t,t:ttsoNn LLy n pl,lin I{DD Jaime R' Maier WIIO ON OAl'l I SAYS 'l'llA'l' llli/SIlll lln S I'}OS'l'lrD I'ltOPIlR NO'l'lCL n S Ii.ljQLJIllllD BY SIICTION 10.03.00 Ol: 'l'llti COI,I,IER COlJNTY I,NND I)I]VHI,OPM[N-I'(]oDI, ON'I'IIE I)AItC]IiI, C]OVI]RED IN PI]]'I]'ION NT-IMI}TiR, PL2O1 101 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 3700 n'f[JRE OIr API'l.lCnN'l' OR n(ilrNl's'f [lBtil'oR P.o. Box Nn MLI (TYPFll) OR l'ltlN'l'l:l)) u. M,r' Corlnrission I :x;rilcs: (Stanrp u'ith sclial rtunrbcr) Sl'A'I'E OF FI-OIIIDA co(iN'l'Y oF c{)t-l#Il //.eLstS o '14 u < q 't'he lirregoing instrunrclrt was s\\{)nr to ancl subsclibcd bclilrc nrc this /? f da} o -Xatad - ?e I * -. pcrsottallr kttorvtr to tttc or l.lro pt'trclttcccl and rrho did/did not lakc an oath Jvn'n24tt' as idcntilication -n41J,. 3/24 signiiirrt,.rJ N,,tan iiuf,tic -T- I Al)rtx 4<,of iirinr.t N,rnic ,il'Ntrrar.7 I\rblic - AIUSON REED tfY coMMtsslot'l # @ 182578 D0IRES:June 2, ?022 Bo{rded Ihru llobty Publh und€Mrltolt Rev.3l4l2015 Jaime R. Maier, Esq.Tampa, FL 33602 ___ CI'I'Y. S]'A]'E ZIP 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Attachment C - Property Hearing Signs (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) I \'-.. l:,'r . \ 7r* I*. 't'^"f.'I'4: ' ,:, rt '.' .#',. : .6'. .,:,..:r! ,j't ", $,. *S,.':;. f'. . i: i.,i" PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE RICHLAND COMMUNICATION TOWER VARIANCE PETITION NO. PL201 80003229 ,iL '{h: TF6--".5*g r_-.1 -/;5-1 CCPC: July 2nd 2020 - 9:00am BCC: September 8th 2O2O - 9:00am BCC MEETING ROOM - COLLIER COUNTY GOVT, CENTER 3299 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES FL34112 TIMOTHY FINN, AICP: 239-252-4312 I rc;*&tp.a.' .J I e l. .,.fl SERVICEs- '2:,gg)."2(D' tJ ",4I 7 41,'il bt*r :.J--t _t [,: [' ,] 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Attachment C - Property Hearing Signs (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) I r * 1' I I I CCPC: July 2n BCC: September BLIC PETITION NO. 2 8th I BCC MEETING ROOM. TIMOTHY 3299 EAST {-vr- rt -j t{ 1 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Attachment C - Property Hearing Signs (12284 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 9.A.3.e Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Attachment D - Waiver Applicant for hybrid quasi-judicial hearing- Richland Communication Tower (12284 : Richland 07/02/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.4 Item Summary: PUDZ-PL20190000734: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which includes the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Residential Single Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a project known as Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD. The project will allow up to 128 residential dwelling units. The property is located at the northwest corner of Lake Trafford Road and North 19th Street, Immokalee, in Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.52± acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 07/02/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Tim Finn 04/21/2020 2:20 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 04/21/2020 2:20 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 05/05/2020 10:43 AM Road Maintenance Diane Lynch Additional Reviewer Completed 05/21/2020 2:11 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 06/11/2020 11:05 AM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 06/11/2020 2:08 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 06/12/2020 8:51 AM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 07/02/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 415 PUDZ-PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD Page 1 of 16 Revised: June 19, 2020 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JULY 2, 2020 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20190000734; IMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, INC. RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ______________________________________________________________________________ OWNERS/CONTRACT PURCHASER/AGENT: Owners: Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP 2600 Golden Gate Parkway #200 Naples, FL 34105 Contract Purchaser/Applicant: Agent: Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. Andres Boral, P.E., M.B.A. 208 Boston Avenue Canon Sandora, E.I. Immokalee, FL 34142 Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. 9911 Corkscrew Road Estero, FL 33967 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone property from the Residential Single Family-4 (RSF-4) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district and approval of the accompanying Agreement Authorizing Affordable-Workforce Housing Density Bonus. The subject property is comprised of one parcel and is owned by Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at the northwest corner of Lake Trafford Road and North 19th Street, Immokalee, in Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.52+/- acres (see location map on page 2). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petition seeks to rezone the property to RPUD to allow for the development of up to 128 residential dwelling units at 13.44 (DU/AC). 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD Page 2 of 16 Revised: June 19, 2020 9.A.4.aPacket Pg. 417Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing PUDZ-PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD Page 3 of 16 Revised: June 19, 2020 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses, zoning classifications, and maximum approved densities for properties surrounding boundaries of Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD: North: Undeveloped land, with a current zoning designation of Faith Landing RPUD (4.98 DU/AC), which is approved for single-family attached and detached residential units, to the east is developed with single family residential, with a current zoning designation of RSF-4 East: North 19th Street, (local road), then developed single family residential, with a current zoning designation of RSF-4, to the south is developed multi-family residential, with a current zoning designation of Residential Multi-Family (RMF-12) District, then at the northeast corner of North 19th Street and Lake Trafford Road intersection is developed with a gas station with convenience store, with a current zoning designation of Commercial Intermediate (C-3) District South: Lake Trafford Road (local road), then developed with a nursery at the at the southwest corner of North 19th Street and Lake Trafford Road intersection, then to the west is developed with mobile homes with a current zoning designation of Village Residential (VR) District West: Undeveloped land, with a zoning designation of Rural Agricultural within the Mobile Home Overlay (A-MHO) District Aerial Photo (Property Appraiser (GIS) 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD Page 4 of 16 Revised: June 19, 2020 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The Fair Housing Alliance PUD rezone property is currently designated Urban – High Residential Subdistrict, as identified on Future Land Use Map series of the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP). Relevant to this petition, High Residential Subdistrict provisions allow a maximum density of 16 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) for the subject parcel. This request is for a density less than 14 DU/A. According to the IAMP, “the purpose of this [High Residential] designation is to provide a Subdistrict for high density residential development. Residential dwellings shall be limited to multi-family structures and less intensive units such as single family and duplexes provided; they are compatible with the district. Mobile home developments shall be permitted only in the form of mobile home subdivisions or parks as defined in the Land Development Code. A density less than or equal to eight (8) dwelling units per gross acre is permitted.” The Immokalee Area Master Plan, Density Rating System, section “1.a” states, in part, “within the applicable Urban designated areas, a base density of 4 residential dwelling units per gross acre is allowed, though not an entitlement.” The Immokalee Area Master Plan, Density Rating System, Density Bonuses subsection “b” states, “to encourage the provision of affordable housing within certain Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to twelve (12) residential units per gross acre may be added to the base density if the project meets the definition and requirements of the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended) and if the affordable housing units are targeted for families earning no greater than 140% of the median income for Collier County. This bonus may be applied to an entire project or portions of a project provided that the project is located within the Neighborhood Center (NC) Subdistrict, Commerce Center-Mixed Use (CC-MU) Subdistrict or any residential subdistrict.” This developer has a proposed “Agreement Authorizing Affordable-Workforce Housing Density Bonus…” (updated for a maximum of 128 DUs with a density of 13.44 units per gross acre). The “Agreement” ensures that the developer constructs 90 affordable units (70% of the 128 for sale or rental units) for the 9.44 DU/A density bonus granted. The Fair Housing Alliance project may be eligible for up to 16 DU/A with a base of 4 DU/A + 12 DU/A for a total of 152 DUs (16 DU/A * ±9.52 = 152.32 DU/A = 152) and, the density proposed is consistent with the Density Rating System of the IAMP. Based upon the above analysis, this proposed PUDZ may be deemed consistent with the IAMP and the FLUE. (see Attachment B – FLUE Consistency Review) Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s September 24, 2019 Trip Generation Statement (TIS) for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the then applicable 2018 and the current 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD Page 5 of 16 Revised: June 19, 2020 Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation appl ications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition, the requested PUDZ rezone proposes a maximum of 128 total multi-family dwelling units, which due to the affordable housing of farmworker families who use a greater percentage of bicycle, bus and carpooling as a major means of transportation the number of equivalent dwelling units has reduced by a factor of 0.5 or 64 dwelling units; which will generate a projected +/- 40 PM peak hour, two-way trips that will occur on the following adjacent roadway network. This alternative calculation is incorporated into the PUD trip limit developer commitment. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway link: Roadway Link 2018 AUIR LOS 2019 AUIR LOS Current Peak Hour Peak Direction Service Volume/Peak Direction 2018 Remaining Capacity 2019 Remaining Capacity Lake Trafford Road Carson Road to State Road 29 C C 800/East 249 292 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD Page 6 of 16 Revised: June 19, 2020 State Road 29 9th Street to County Road 29A North D D 525/South 174 68 • Note: The above link on SR 29 has an expected deficiency in 2025; however, the traffic impacts from this development are less than 1% and therefore consistent with GMP Policy 5.2 are considered a “de minimis” impact. Based on the 2019 AUIR’s, the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed trips for this project within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): The petition is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the GMP. Prior to unpermitted clearing that occurred between 2007-2008, the project site consisted of 9.41 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 1.41 acres (15 percent) preserve is required and shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Applications to rezone to or to amend RPUDs shall be in the form of a RPUD Master Plan of development, along with a list of permitted and accessory uses and a development standards table. The RPUD application shall also include a list of developer commitments and any proposed deviations from the LDC. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC’s recommendation. The CCPC uses the aforementioned criteria as the basis for its recommendation to the Board, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading “Zoning Services Analysis.” In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document to address environmental concerns. The PUD preserve requirement is 1.41 acres (15 percent of 9.41 acres). The proposed PUD Master Plan provides 1.41 acres of preserve, which meets the minimum 15 percent native vegetation preservation requirement in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. Florida Scrub Jays were observed on-site. No other listed species were observed on the property. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD Page 7 of 16 Revised: June 19, 2020 This project requires Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project meets the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Specifically, Florida Scrub Jays have been identified on- site within the last 5 years. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Utilities Review: Public Utilities staff did not review this petition as the property is not within the Collier County Water-Sewer District. Landscape Review: Staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the LDC and recommends approval of this project. There are no deviations regarding landscape for this petition. The buffer types labeled on the Master Plan are consistent with the Land Development Code. Affordable Housing Review: Staff has reviewed the petition and accompanying Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement. The application seeks a density bonus of 9.44 units per acre in exchange for providing 70% of the residential units (90 units) as rental housing affordable to households earning less than 80% of the Area Median Income. The proposal meets the requirements of the Affordable Housing Density Bonus provisions on the LDC. Community and Human Services Division recommends approval of this project and the associated Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement. (See Attachment E) Historic Preservation Review: The subject property lies with an Historical/Archaeological Probability Area. As such the petitioner was required to submit a waiver application from the required historical and archaeological survey and assessment application. This application was heard before the Historic/Archaeological Preservation Board (HAPB) at its November 15, 2019 meeting and approved this waiver subject to the condition, “Monitor the excavation by a Certified Archaeologist.” (See Attachment C) School District: At this time, there is sufficient capacity within the elementary and middle concurrency service areas and in an adjacent high school concurrency service area of the proposed development. At the time of SDP or platting, the project will be evaluated for school concurrency. Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) – The subject property is located within the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area and as such the CRA serves as the primary vehicle for community and professional input on petitions. The CRA supports the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance plans to develop this property with 128 multi-family units. (See Support Letter, dated August 26, 2019, Attachment D) Zoning Services Review: Staff analyzed the proposed density and compared it to the densities on the abutting properties. As previously mentioned in the Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning portion of the staff report, to the north, the Faith Landing RPUD has a density of 4.98 DU/AC and to the east of this RPUD is zoned RS-4 which has a density of 4.0 DU/AC. To the east of the proposed Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD is also zoned RSF-4 (4.0 DU/AC), 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD Page 8 of 16 Revised: June 19, 2020 Residential Multifamily (RMF-12) with a density of 12.0 DU/AC, and Commercial Intermediate (C-3) District. To the south is developed with mobile homes zoned Village Residential with a density of 14.52 DU/AC and to the west is undeveloped land zoned A-MHO District with a density of 0.2 DU/AC. This petition proposes a density of 13.44 DU/AC, which is compatible to the properties to the east and south. Even though Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD is proposing more dwelling units per acre than what is allowed in the Faith Landing RPUD, RSF-4, and A-MHO District to the west and north, it should be noted that the existing development in the surrounding area is a mixture of single, multi-family, and mobile homes and is not out of context with regard to the community character of the immediate vicinity. Staff analyzed the proposed uses and associated development standards in the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD and compared them with the uses allowed in the Faith Landing RPUD, RSF-4, RMF-12, C-3, VR, and A-MHO District. Currently, the Faith Landing RPUD has developed single family residential and is approved for single family detached and attached units and the RSF-4 District has developed single family which is approved for single family dwellings, family care facilities, educational plants, and public schools. The RMF-12 property currently has multi-family dwellings and is approved for multi-family and single-family dwellings, family care facilities, educational plants, and schools. The C-3 property is currently developed with a gas station with convenience store and is approved for a wide range of commercial uses. The Village Residential (VR) property to the south is developed with mobile homes and a nursery and is approved for single family and multi-family dwellings, mobile homes, family care facilities, educational plants, and public schools. The A-MHO property to the west is currently undeveloped and is approved for mobile homes and a mixture of housing types and agricultural uses. Therefore, the proposed uses in the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD would be compatible with the surrounding allowed uses in the Faith Landing RPUD, RSF-4, RMF-12, C-3, VR, and A-MHO Districts. Staff analyzed the development standards for principal structures proposed within the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD and how they compare to the Faith Landing RPUD, RSF-4, RMF-12, C-3, VR, and A-MHO Districts. In short, the minimum building height, minimum distance between buildings, and the minimum floor areas proposed for the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD are less than the Faith Landing RPUD, RSF-4, RMF-12, C-3, VR, and A-MHO Districts. The minimum front and side yards proposed for the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD is more than what is currently allowed in the Faith Landing RPUD, RSF-4, RMF-12, C-3, VR, and A-MHO Districts. The minimum preserve setback is equal to the Faith Landing RPUD located to the north. As such, the proposed Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD development standards are compatible with the surrounding areas around the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD property. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08”: 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD Page 9 of 16 Revised: June 19, 2020 relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The subject site fronts at the northwestern corner of the intersection of Lake Trafford Road and North 19th Street. Water and wastewater facilities are located within the right-of-way, and each has enough capacity to serve the proposed RPUD. Drainage solutions would be evaluated in connection with SDP/platting and construction permits. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report (or within an accompanying memorandum). 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which condition s may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Staff Analysis section of this staff report subsection Landscape Review, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The RPUD is required to provide at least 60% of the gross area for usable open space. No deviation from the open space requirement is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or platting. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD Page 10 of 16 Revised: June 19, 2020 when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies, to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner, and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will continuously be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. One deviation is proposed in connection with this request to rezone to RPUD. See deviations section of the staff report beginning on page 13. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable”: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The subject parcel is of sufficient size and therefore will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. It is also comparable with expected land uses by virtue of its consistency with the FLUE of the GMP. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The square-shape boundary of the RPUD logically follows the external boundary of the parcel assembled for the rezoning. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD Page 11 of 16 Revised: June 19, 2020 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed rezone is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. It should be noted that the proposed uses are not allowed under the current zoning classification. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD Rezone is consistent with the County’s land use policies that are reflected by the FLUE of the GMP. Development in compliance with the proposed PUD rezone should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed RPUD request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area; provided an environmental resource permit that addresses stormwater best management practices, stormwater pollution prevention, urban stormwater management, on-site stormwater treatment, and attenuation storage is obtained from the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will evaluate the project’s stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at time of SDP and/or plat review. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The current zoning designation of RSF-4 zoning district includes a maximum allowable height for principal uses of 35 feet. The proposed RPUD includes a maximum allowable height of residential buildings of 30 feet zoned and 40 feet actual. The proposed RPUD also eliminates the potential for numerous manufacturing and commercial uses that could impact light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD Page 12 of 16 Revised: June 19, 2020 external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Properties to the north, east, and south are developed, whereas the property to the west is undeveloped, as previously noted. The basic premise underlying all the development standards in the LDC is that sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. Because the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The proposed uses and development standards are not permitted, according to the existing classification. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff’s opinion the proposed uses and associated development standards and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD Page 13 of 16 Revised: June 19, 2020 would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD Document. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. The activity proposed by this rezoning will have no impact on public facility adequacy regarding utilities. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking one deviation from the requirements of the LDC. The deviations are directly extracted from PUD Exhibit E. The petitioner’s rationale and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. Proposed Deviation #1: (Parking Spaces) “Deviation 1 seeks relief LDC Section 4.05.04.G, which requires one space per unit plus one visitor parking space per unit for dwelling units with two bedrooms or larger, to instead reduce the amount of parking required to 1.5 space per dwelling unit of two bedrooms or larger.” Petitioner’s Justification: Immokalee farm worker and other low-income families have an average of 1.5 vehicles or less per family. Farm worker families often use other means of transportation including bicycle and employer bus transportation to and from work. Bicycle racks are proposed to accommodate for the future residents. Two bus parking spaces will be provided. Onsite recreational facilities and the community center will have 10 parking spaces. Please see Oak Haven Apartments Zoning Verification Letter stating that a Parking Variance was approved 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD Page 14 of 16 Revised: June 19, 2020 for a similar affordable housing development in Collier County to allow a reduction in the required parking to 1.5 spaces/unit. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community,” and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” DECEMBER 19, 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): It should be noted that per the Collier County Land Development Code and the Collier County Administrative Code for Land Development, a petitioner must run a newspaper advertisement of a NIM meeting and give notice by mail to property owners and/or condominium and civic associations at least 15 days prior to a scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. It was discovered in early December 2019 that the petitioner only gave 9 days prior to the December 19 NIM. As such, the petitioner was advised by staff to continue to hold the December 19 NIM; however, the petitioner needed to schedule a second NIM to comply with the 15-day advertising policy. On January 16, 2020 the petitioner ran the newspaper ad in the Naples Daily News and sent the NIM letter notice to all affected residents, businesses and landowners for a February 3, 2020 NIM Meeting. The applicant conducted the first NIM on December 19, 2019 at the Fellowship Church located at 1411 Lake Trafford Road in Immokalee. The applicant’s agent explained the request for the proposed rezone. Canon Sandora, the agent, conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team and staff, and an overview of the proposed RPUD rezoning application, including the requested residential uses, density, setbacks, maximum allowable height, location of preserve areas, and access. Following the agent’s presentation, the meeting was opened up to attendees to make comments and ask the consultant team questions regarding the proposed development. Some concerns raised by attendees were the detention area and the uses within Tract B. No commitments were made. A copy of the sign-in sheet, handouts, NIM synopsis, presentation, and transcript are included in the Backup Materials in Attachment F. FEBRUARY 3, 2020 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted the second NIM on February 3, 2020 at the Fellowship Church located at 1411 Lake Trafford Road in Immokalee. The applicant’s agent explained the request for the proposed rezone. Dr. Arol Buntzman, chair of the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance explained and gave a detailed overview of the nonprofit organization. He explained their plan to develop a 128-unit affordable housing project for low to very low-income families. After Dr. Arol Buntzmans presentation 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) PUDZ-PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Inc. RPUD Page 15 of 16 Revised: June 19, 2020 concluded, Canon Sandora, the agent, conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team and staff, and an overview of the proposed RPUD rezoning application, including the requested residential use to include 8 sixteen-unit buildings with a community center. Mr. Sandora also explained the projects density, setbacks, maximum allowable height, location of preserve areas, and access. Following the agent’s presentation, the meeting was opened up to attendees to make comments and ask the consultant team questions regarding the proposed development. Some concerns raised by attendees were a proposed pre-school and afterschool in the community center and any environmental issues. The petitioner said any environmental issues were resolved. The agent did clarify that the pre-school and afterschool will be just for the residents and will not be a commercial operation. As such, this commitment was added to the PUD document under accessory uses, “Pre-School and after school shall be for residents and their guests.” A copy of the sign-in sheet, handouts, NIM synopsis, presentation, and transcript are included in the Backup Materials in Attachment F. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2 -1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed this staff report on June 15, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval of the PUD and of the Agreement Authorizing Affordable-Workforce Housing Density Bonus. Attachments: A) Proposed Ordinance B) FLUE Consistency Memo C) Waiver Application from the required Historical and Archaeological Survey and Assessment, approved November 11, 2019. D) Immokalee CRA Support Letter, dated August 26, 2019 E) Affordable Housing Agreement F) Application/Backup Materials 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) PREPARED BY: _______________________________________ _____________________ TIMOTHY FINN, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: _______________________________________ ______________________ RAYMOND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION APPROVED BY: _________________________________________ ______________________ JAMES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Staff Report - Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.bPacket Pg. 436Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) ‒ 1 ‒ PL20190000734, Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Growth Management Department Zoning Division C O N S I S T E N C Y R E V I E W M E M O R A N D U M To: Timothy Finn, AICP, Zoning Services Section From: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: (revised to) January 29, 2020 Subject: IAMP Consistency Review of Proposed Planned Unit Development Rezone PETITION NUMBER: PUDZ-PL20190000734 [REV: 4.2] PETITION NAME: Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezone REQUEST: This petition requests a rezone from the RSF-4, Residential Single-Family zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to allow development of up to 128 multi- family dwelling units – or, up to a maximum density of 13.44 dwelling units per acre. LOCATION: The subject site, consisting of ±9.52 acres, is located on the northwest corner of Lake Trafford Road and North 19th Street, Immokalee, in Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The Fair Housing Alliance PUD rezone property is currently designated Urban – High Residential Subdistrict, as identified on Future Land Use Map series of the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP). Relevant to this petition, High Residential Subdistrict provisions allow a maximum density of 16 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) for the subject parcel. This request is for a density less than 14 DU/A. According to the IAMP, “the purpose of this [High Residential] designation is to provide a Subdistrict for high density residential development. Residential dwellings shall be limited to multi-family structures and less intensive units such as single family and duplexes provided they are compatible with the district. Mobile home developments shall be permitted only in the form of mobile home subdivisions or parks as defined in the Land Development Code. A density less than or equal to eight (8) dwelling units per gross acre is permitted.” The Immokalee Area Master Plan, Density Rating System, section “1.a” states, in part, “within the applicable Urban designated areas, a base density of 4 residential dwelling units per gross acre is allowed, though not an entitlement.” The Immokalee Area Master Plan, Density Rating System, Density Bonuses subsection “b” states, “to encourage the provision of affordable housing within certain Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to twelve (12) residential units per gross acre may be added to the base density if the project meets the definition and requirements of the Affordable Housing 9.A.4.c Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Memo (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) ‒ 2 ‒ PL20190000734, Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended) and if the affordable housing units are targeted for families earning no greater than 140% of the median income for Collier County. This bonus may be applied to an entire project or portions of a project provided that the project is located within the Neighborhood Center (NC) Subdistrict, Commerce Center-Mixed Use (CC-MU) Subdistrict or any residential subdistrict.” This developer has a proposed “Agreement Authorizing Affordable-Workforce Housing Density Bonus…” (updated for a maximum of 128 DUs with a density of 13.44 units per gross acre). The “Agreement” ensures that the developer constructs 90 affordable units (70% of the 128 for sale or rental units) for the 9.44 DU/A density bonus granted. The Fair Housing Alliance project may be eligible for up to 16 DU/A with a base of 4 DU/A + 12 DU/A for a total of 152 DUs (16 DU/A * ±9.52 = 152.32 DU/A = 152) and, the density proposed is consistent with the Density Rating System of the IAMP. Fourth submittal revisions did not affect consistency with the Immokalee Area Master Plan or Future Land Use Element. Future Land Use Element Policy 5.6 requires new developments to be compatible with the surrounding land area. Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. The County recognizes Smart Growth policies and practices in its consideration of future land use arrangements and choice-making options. FLUE Objective 7 and Policies 7.1 through 7.4 promote Smart Growth policies for new development and redevelopment projects pertaining to access, interconnections, open space, and walkable communities. Each policy is followed by preliminary and partial review staff observations and comments [in bold italicized text]. Objective 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The Fair Housing Alliance Master Site Plan (Exhibit C-1), depicts a corner subject property fronting Lake Trafford Road (classified as a major arterial road) and North 19th Street (classified local roadway). Entry points are provided to both Lake Trafford Road and North 19th Street, at relatively distant points from the intersection.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Master Site Plan depicts a loop drive providing access to/from both Lake Trafford Road and North 19th Street.] 9.A.4.c Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Memo (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) ‒ 3 ‒ PL20190000734, Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [The site abuts North 19th Street along its eastern edge, and Lake Trafford Road along its southern edge. No local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments are proposed . Partially-developed residential land lies adjacently north and northwest, where opportunities for interconnection are not feasible. The adjoining land in this area is already platted with its Preserve. On-site, this area is planned for the required Preserve area – a large, contiguous area that extends to along the western boundary – where similarly, interconnection to residential land does not appear feasible. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [With respect to how this development responds to the County’s future plans in providing a walkable community generally, the Master Site Plan depicts sidewalks along both sides of the internal traffic areas; with pedestrian walkways along both sides of the North 19th Street entranceway, and along a single side of the Lake Trafford Road entrance. With respect to how this development provides a blend of densities, submittal documents propose a relatively homogeneous design, of uniform density. With respect to how this development provides common open space, the Master Site Plan depicts Preserve Area, a sports court, and “recreation areas” throughout the development. With respect to how this development provides civic facilities, the Master Site Plan depicts and other materials allow, a Community Center and other amenities that sometimes function as civic facilities, e.g. polling place. With respect to how this development provides a range of housing prices and types, Fair Housing Alliance provides for the construction of 90 affordable residential units of the maximum of 128 units in multi-family detached buildings.] CONCLUSION: Based upon the above analysis, this proposed PUDZ may be deemed consistent with the IAMP and the FLUE. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager, Zoning Services Section David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section G: Comp\Consistency Reviews\2020 \\bcc.colliergov.net\data\GMD-LDS\CDES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews\2020\PUDZ\PUDZ-PL2019-734 Immok FH Alliance_R4 FNL2.docx 9.A.4.c Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Memo (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Attachment C - Waiver from Cultural Archaeological Assessment (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Attachment C - Waiver from Cultural Archaeological Assessment (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Attachment C - Waiver from Cultural Archaeological Assessment (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Attachment C - Waiver from Cultural Archaeological Assessment (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Attachment C - Waiver from Cultural Archaeological Assessment (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.e Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Attachment D - Immokalee CRA Support Letter (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 449Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 450Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 451Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 452Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 453Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 454Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 455Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 456Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 457Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 458Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 459Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 460Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 461Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 462Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 463Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 464Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 465Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 466Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 467Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 468Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 469Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 470Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 471Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 472Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 473Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD 9.A.4.fPacket Pg. 474Attachment: Attachment E - Affordable Housing Agreement stamped by CAO 062420-1151 (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD K>>/ZKhEdz'KsZEDEd ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^^,KZ/s 'ZKtd,DE'DEdWZdDEd EW>^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y͗;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϲϯϱϴ February 1, 2019 WĂŐĞϭŽĨϭϭ ƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌĂWƵďůŝĐ,ĞĂƌŝŶŐĨŽƌWhZĞǌŽŶĞ͕ŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƚŽWhŽƌ WhƚŽWhZĞǌŽŶĞ Wd/d/KEEK WZK:dED dWZK^^ WhZĞǌŽŶĞ;WhͿ͗>ƐƵďƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϬ͘ϬϮ͘ϭϯ͘Ͳ&͕͘Ś͘ϯ'͘ϭŽĨƚŚĞĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞŽĚĞ ŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƚŽWh;WhͿ͗>ƐƵďƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϬ͘ϬϮ͘ϭϯ͘ĂŶĚŚ͘ϯ'͘ϮŽĨƚŚĞĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞ ŽĚĞ WhƚŽWhZĞǌŽŶĞ;WhZͿ͗>ƐƵďƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϬ͘ϬϮ͘ϭϯ͘Ͳ&͘ WW>/EdKEdd/E&KZDd/KE EĂŵĞŽĨWƌŽƉĞƌƚǇKǁŶĞƌ;ƐͿ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ EĂŵĞŽĨƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚŝĨĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚƚŚĂŶŽǁŶĞƌ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺŝƚǇ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ^ƚĂƚĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ/W͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ dĞůĞƉŚŽŶĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺĞůů͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ&Ăǆ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͲDĂŝůĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ EĂŵĞŽĨŐĞŶƚ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ &ŝƌŵ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺŝƚǇ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ^ƚĂƚĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ/W͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ dĞůĞƉŚŽŶĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺĞůů͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ&Ăǆ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͲDĂŝůĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ĞĂǁĂƌĞƚŚĂƚŽůůŝĞƌŽƵŶƚǇŚĂƐůŽďďǇŝƐƚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘'ƵŝĚĞǇŽƵƌƐĞůĨĂĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐůǇĂŶĚĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚ ǇŽƵĂƌĞŝŶĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƐĞƌĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘ dŽďĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚďǇƐƚĂĨĨ Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. Lake Trafford Rd. Immokalee FL 34142 arol1112@yahoo.com Andres Boral, P.E., M.B.A., Canon Sandora, E.I. Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. 9911 Corkscrew Rd. Estero FL 33967 239-692-6738 canon@boralengineering.com ✔ 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) K>>/ZKhEdz'KsZEDEd ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^^,KZ/s 'ZKtd,DE'DEdWZdDEd EW>^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y͗;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϲϯϱϴ February 1, 2019 WĂŐĞϮŽĨϭϭ ZKEZYh^d dŚŝƐĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŝƐƌĞƋƵĞƐƚŝŶŐĂƌĞǌŽŶĞĨƌŽŵ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺŽŶŝŶŐĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ;ƐͿƚŽƚŚĞ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺǌŽŶŝŶŐĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ;ƐͿ͘ WƌĞƐĞŶƚhƐĞŽĨƚŚĞWƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚhƐĞ;ŽƌƌĂŶŐĞŽĨƵƐĞƐͿŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ KƌŝŐŝŶĂůWhEĂŵĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ KƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞEŽ͗͘ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ WZKWZdz/E&KZDd/KE KŶĂƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞƐŚĞĞƚĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĚĞƚĂŝůĞĚůĞŐĂůĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ ĐŽǀĞƌĞĚďǇƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ x /ĨƚŚĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚŝŶǀŽůǀĞƐĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƚŽŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶŽŶĞǌŽŶŝŶŐĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͕ƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚƐŚĂůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂ ƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞůĞŐĂůĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇŝŶǀŽůǀĞĚŝŶĞĂĐŚĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͖ x dŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚƐŚĂůůƐƵďŵŝƚϰĐŽƉŝĞƐŽĨĂƌĞĐĞŶƚƐƵƌǀĞǇ;ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞůĂƐƚƐŝǆŵŽŶƚŚƐ͕ ŵĂǆŝŵƵŵϭΗƚŽϰϬϬΖƐĐĂůĞͿ͕ŝĨƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƚŽĚŽƐŽĂƚƚŚĞƉƌĞͲĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŵĞĞƚŝŶŐ͖ĂŶĚ x dŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚŝƐƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞĨŽƌƐƵƉƉůǇŝŶŐƚŚĞĐŽƌƌĞĐƚůĞŐĂůĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ͘/ĨƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐĂƌŝƐĞ ĐŽŶĐĞƌŶŝŶŐƚŚĞůĞŐĂůĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌΖƐĐĞƌƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŽƌƐĞĂůĞĚƐƵƌǀĞǇŵĂǇďĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘ ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶͬdŽǁŶƐŚŝƉͬZĂŶŐĞ͗ͬͬ >Žƚ͗ůŽĐŬ͗^ƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DĞƚĞƐΘŽƵŶĚƐĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ WůĂƚŽŽŬ͗WĂŐĞη͗WƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ/͘͘EƵŵďĞƌ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ^ŝǌĞŽĨWƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺĨƚ͘ǆͺͺͺͺͺͺͺĨƚ͘сͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺdŽƚĂů^Ƌ͘&ƚ͘ĐƌĞƐ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ĚĚƌĞƐƐͬ'ĞŶĞƌĂů>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ^ƵďũĞĐƚWƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ WhŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ;ƌĞĨĞƌƚŽ>ƐƵďƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϮ͘Ϭϯ͘ϬϲͿ͗ ŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇ&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů DŝǆĞĚhƐĞKƚŚĞƌ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ N/A RSF-4 Vacant Residential N/A 32 46 29 N/A SW1/4 of SW1/4 of NE1/4 EXC HWAY 00074280005 663 665 414,991 9.52 The property at the corner of Lake Trafford Rd. and North 19th St. PUD 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) K>>/ZKhEdz'KsZEDEd ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^^,KZ/s 'ZKtd,DE'DEdWZdDEd EW>^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y͗;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϲϯϱϴ February 1, 2019 WĂŐĞϯŽĨϭϭ :EdKE/E'E>Eh^ ŽŶŝŶŐ>ĂŶĚhƐĞ E ^ t /ĨƚŚĞŽǁŶĞƌŽĨƚŚĞƐƵďũĞĐƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇŽǁŶƐĐŽŶƚŝŐƵŽƵƐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇƉůĞĂƐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĚĞƚĂŝůĞĚůĞŐĂů ĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞĞŶƚŝƌĞĐŽŶƚŝŐƵŽƵƐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇŽŶĂƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞƐŚĞĞƚĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘ ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶͬdŽǁŶƐŚŝƉͬZĂŶŐĞ͗ͬͬ >Žƚ͗ůŽĐŬ͗^ƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ WůĂƚŽŽŬ͗WĂŐĞη͗WƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ/͘͘EƵŵďĞƌ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DĞƚĞƐΘŽƵŶĚƐĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ^^K/d/KE^ ZĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͗>ŝƐƚĂůůƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚ,ŽŵĞKǁŶĞƌƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶ;ƐͿƚŚĂƚĐŽƵůĚďĞĂĨĨĞĐƚĞĚďǇƚŚŝƐƉĞƚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ WƌŽǀŝĚĞ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů ƐŚĞĞƚƐ ŝĨ ŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇ͘ /ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ ĐĂŶ ďĞ ĨŽƵŶĚ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ŽĂƌĚ ŽĨ ŽƵŶƚǇ ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƌ͛ƐǁĞďƐŝƚĞĂƚŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚͬ/ŶĚĞǆ͘ĂƐƉǆ͍ƉĂŐĞсϳϳϰ͘ EĂŵĞŽĨ,ŽŵĞŽǁŶĞƌƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DĂŝůŝŶŐĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺŝƚǇ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ^ƚĂƚĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺ/W͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺ EĂŵĞŽĨ,ŽŵĞŽǁŶĞƌƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DĂŝůŝŶŐĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺŝƚǇ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ^ƚĂƚĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺ/W͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺ EĂŵĞŽĨ,ŽŵĞŽǁŶĞƌƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DĂŝůŝŶŐĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺŝƚǇ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ^ƚĂƚĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺ/W͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺ EĂŵĞŽĨ,ŽŵĞŽǁŶĞƌƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DĂŝůŝŶŐĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺŝƚǇ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ^ƚĂƚĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺ/W͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺ EĂŵĞŽĨ,ŽŵĞŽǁŶĞƌƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DĂŝůŝŶŐĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺŝƚǇ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ^ƚĂƚĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺ/W͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺ RPUD, RSF-4 Residential ROW Lake Trafford Rd. ROW N. 19th St. RSF-4 Vacant N/A N/A 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) K>>/ZKhEdz'KsZEDEd ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^^,KZ/s 'ZKtd,DE'DEdWZdDEd EW>^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y͗;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϲϯϱϴ February 1, 2019 WĂŐĞϰŽĨϭϭ s>hd/KEZ/dZ/ WƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽ>ƐƵďƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐϭϬ͘ϬϮ͘ϭϯ͕ϭϬ͘ϬϮ͘Ϭϴ&ĂŶĚŚĂƉƚĞƌϯ'͘ŽĨƚŚĞĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞŽĚĞ͕ ƐƚĂĨĨ͛ƐĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐĂŶĚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ͛Ɛ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞŽĂƌĚŽĨŽƵŶƚǇŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƌƐƐŚĂůůďĞďĂƐĞĚƵƉŽŶĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ ĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͘KŶĂƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞƐŚĞĞƚĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶĂƌƌĂƚŝǀĞƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďŝŶŐƚŚĞƌĞǌŽŶĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚǁŝƚŚƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽƚŚĞĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂďĞůŽǁ͘/ŶĐůƵĚĞĂŶǇďĂĐŬƵƉ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĂŶĚĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶŝŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŽĨƚŚĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚ͘ Ă͘ dŚĞƐƵŝƚĂďŝůŝƚǇŽĨƚŚĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌƚŚĞƚǇƉĞĂŶĚƉĂƚƚĞƌŶŽĨĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŝŶƌĞůĂƚŝŽŶƚŽ ƉŚǇƐŝĐĂůĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐŽĨƚŚĞůĂŶĚ͕ƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐĂƌĞĂƐ͕ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĂŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐ͕ĚƌĂŝŶĂŐĞ͕ƐĞǁĞƌ͕ ǁĂƚĞƌ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƵƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘ ď͘ ĚĞƋƵĂĐǇŽĨĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞŽĨƵŶŝĨŝĞĚĐŽŶƚƌŽůĂŶĚƐƵŝƚĂďŝůŝƚǇŽĨĂŶǇƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĂŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚ͕ ŽƌŽƚŚĞƌŝŶƐƚƌƵŵĞŶƚƐ͕ŽƌĨŽƌĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐŝŶƚŚŽƐĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ͕ƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌůǇĂƐƚŚĞǇŵĂǇƌĞůĂƚĞƚŽ ĂƌƌĂŶŐĞŵĞŶƚƐŽƌƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶƐƚŽďĞŵĂĚĞĨŽƌƚŚĞĐŽŶƚŝŶƵŝŶŐŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŽĨƐƵĐŚ ĂƌĞĂƐĂŶĚĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞŶŽƚƚŽďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŽƌŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĞĚĂƚƉƵďůŝĐĞǆƉĞŶƐĞ͘&ŝŶĚŝŶŐƐĂŶĚ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚŝƐƚǇƉĞƐŚĂůůďĞŵĂĚĞŽŶůǇĂĨƚĞƌĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĐŽƵŶƚǇĂƚƚŽƌŶĞǇ͘ Đ͘ ŽŶĨŽƌŵŝƚǇ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ Wh ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ŐŽĂůƐ͕ ŽďũĞĐƚŝǀĞƐ ĂŶĚ ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ 'ƌŽǁƚŚ DĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚWůĂŶ͘;dŚŝƐŝƐƚŽŝŶĐůƵĚĞŝĚĞŶƚŝĨǇŝŶŐǁŚĂƚ^ƵďͲĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͕ƉŽůŝĐǇŽƌŽƚŚĞƌƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂůůŽǁƐƚŚĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚƵƐĞƐͬĚĞŶƐŝƚǇ͕ĂŶĚĨƵůůǇĞǆƉůĂŝŶŝŶŐͬĂĚĚƌĞƐƐŝŶŐĂůůĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂŽƌĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐŽĨ ƚŚĂƚ^ƵďͲĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͕ƉŽůŝĐǇŽƌŽƚŚĞƌƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶ͘Ϳ Ě͘ dŚĞ ŝŶƚĞƌŶĂů ĂŶĚ ĞǆƚĞƌŶĂů ĐŽŵƉĂƚŝďŝůŝƚǇ ŽĨ ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ ƵƐĞƐ͕ ǁŚŝĐŚ ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ ŵĂǇ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ƌĞƐƚƌŝĐƚŝŽŶƐŽŶůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƌĞƐƚƌŝĐƚŝŽŶƐŽŶĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ĂŶĚďƵĨĨĞƌŝŶŐĂŶĚƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ Ğ͘ dŚĞ ĂĚĞƋƵĂĐǇ ŽĨ ƵƐĂďůĞ ŽƉĞŶ ƐƉĂĐĞ ĂƌĞĂƐ ŝŶ ĞǆŝƐƚĞŶĐĞ ĂŶĚ ĂƐ ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ ƚŽ ƐĞƌǀĞ ƚŚĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ Ĩ͘ dŚĞƚŝŵŝŶŐŽƌƐĞƋƵĞŶĐĞŽĨĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƵƌƉŽƐĞŽĨĂƐƐƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞĂĚĞƋƵĂĐǇŽĨĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ďŽƚŚƉƵďůŝĐĂŶĚƉƌŝǀĂƚĞ͘ Ő͘ dŚĞĂďŝůŝƚǇŽĨƚŚĞƐƵďũĞĐƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇĂŶĚŽĨƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐĂƌĞĂƐƚŽĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞĞǆƉĂŶƐŝŽŶ͘ Ś͘ ŽŶĨŽƌŵŝƚǇǁŝƚŚWhƌĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ŽƌĂƐƚŽĚĞƐŝƌĂďůĞŵŽĚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƐƵĐŚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐŝŶƚŚĞ ƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌĐĂƐĞ͕ďĂƐĞĚŽŶĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶƚŚĂƚƐƵĐŚŵŽĚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨũƵƐƚŝĨŝĞĚĂƐŵĞĞƚŝŶŐƉƵďůŝĐ ƉƵƌƉŽƐĞƐƚŽĂĚĞŐƌĞĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚĞƋƵŝǀĂůĞŶƚƚŽůŝƚĞƌĂůĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƐƵĐŚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘ ĞĞĚZĞƐƚƌŝĐƚŝŽŶƐ͗dŚĞŽƵŶƚǇŝƐůĞŐĂůůǇƉƌĞĐůƵĚĞĚĨƌŽŵĞŶĨŽƌĐŝŶŐĚĞĞĚƌĞƐƚƌŝĐƚŝŽŶƐ͖ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ŵĂŶǇ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐŚĂǀĞĂĚŽƉƚĞĚƐƵĐŚƌĞƐƚƌŝĐƚŝŽŶƐ͘zŽƵŵĂǇǁŝƐŚƚŽĐŽŶƚĂĐƚƚŚĞĐŝǀŝĐŽƌƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇŽǁŶĞƌƐ ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶŝŶƚŚĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌǁŚŝĐŚƚŚŝƐƵƐĞŝƐďĞŝŶŐƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽĂƐĐĞƌƚĂŝŶǁŚĞƚŚĞƌŽƌŶŽƚƚŚĞ ƌĞƋƵĞƐƚŝƐĂĨĨĞĐƚĞĚďǇĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĚĞĞĚƌĞƐƚƌŝĐƚŝŽŶƐ͘ 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) K>>/ZKhEdz'KsZEDEd ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^^,KZ/s 'ZKtd,DE'DEdWZdDEd EW>^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y͗;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϲϯϱϴ February 1, 2019 WĂŐĞϱŽĨϭϭ WƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůĂŶĚƵƐĞƉĞƚŝƚŝŽŶƐŽŶƚŚĞƐƵďũĞĐƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ͗dŽǇŽƵƌŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞ͕ŚĂƐĂƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐďĞĞŶ ŚĞůĚŽŶƚŚŝƐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞůĂƐƚǇĞĂƌ͍/ĨƐŽ͕ǁŚĂƚǁĂƐƚŚĞŶĂƚƵƌĞŽĨƚŚĂƚŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ͍ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ KĨĨŝĐŝĂů/ŶƚĞƌƉƌĞƚĂƚŝŽŶƐŽƌŽŶŝŶŐsĞƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͗dŽǇŽƵƌŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞ͕ŚĂƐƚŚĞƌĞďĞĞŶĂŶŽĨĨŝĐŝĂů ŝŶƚĞƌƉƌĞƚĂƚŝŽŶŽƌǌŽŶŝŶŐǀĞƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƌĞŶĚĞƌĞĚŽŶƚŚŝƐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞůĂƐƚǇĞĂƌ͍ zĞƐEŽŝĨƐŽƉůĞĂƐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĐŽƉŝĞƐ͘ Wh>/EKd/ZYh/ZDEd^ dŚŝƐůĂŶĚƵƐĞƉĞƚŝƚŝŽŶƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐĂEĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚ/ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶDĞĞƚŝŶŐ;E/DͿ͕ƉƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽŚĂƉƚĞƌϯ͘ ŽĨƚŚĞĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞŽĚĞĂŶĚ>ƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϬ͘Ϭϯ͘Ϭϲ͘&ŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƚŚĞE/D͕ƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚǁŝůůƐƵďŵŝƚĂ ǁƌŝƚƚĞŶƐƵŵŵĂƌǇĂŶĚĂŶǇĐŽŵŵŝƚŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶŵĂĚĞĂƚƚŚĞŵĞĞƚŝŶŐ͘ZĞĨĞƌƚŽŚĂƉƚĞƌϴ͘ ŽĨƚŚĞĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞŽĚĞĨŽƌƚŚĞE/DƉƌŽĐĞĚƵƌĂůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ ŚĂƉƚĞƌϴŽĨƚŚĞĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞŽĚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚŵƵƐƚƌĞŵŽǀĞƚŚĞŝƌƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ ĂĚǀĞƌƚŝƐŝŶŐƐŝŐŶ;ƐͿĂĨƚĞƌĨŝŶĂůĂĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƚĂŬĞŶďǇƚŚĞŽĂƌĚŽĨŽƵŶƚǇŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƌƐ͘ĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞ ŽĂƌĚΖƐĨŝŶĂůĂĐƚŝŽŶŽŶƚŚŝƐŝƚĞŵ͕ƉůĞĂƐĞƌĞŵŽǀĞĂůůƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐĂĚǀĞƌƚŝƐŝŶŐƐŝŐŶ;ƐͿŝŵŵĞĚŝĂƚĞůǇ͘ ZKZ/E'K&s>KWZKDD/dDEd^ tŝƚŚŝŶϯϬĚĂǇƐŽĨĂĚŽƉƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞ͕ƚŚĞŽǁŶĞƌŽƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌ;ƐƉĞĐŝĨǇŶĂŵĞͿĂƚƚŚĞŝƌĞǆƉĞŶƐĞƐŚĂůů ƌĞĐŽƌĚŝŶƚŚĞWƵďůŝĐZĞĐŽƌĚƐŽĨŽůůŝĞƌŽƵŶƚǇĂDĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵŽĨhŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐŽĨĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌŽŵŵŝƚŵĞŶƚƐ ŽƌEŽƚŝĐĞŽĨĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌŽŵŵŝƚŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐƚŚĞůĞŐĂůĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇƚŚĂƚŝƐƚŚĞƐƵďũĞĐƚŽĨ ƚŚĞůĂŶĚƵƐĞƉĞƚŝƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĞĂĐŚĂŶĚĞǀĞƌǇĐŽŵŵŝƚŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞŽǁŶĞƌŽƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ KƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞ͘dŚĞDĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵŽƌEŽƚŝĐĞƐŚĂůůďĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂĐĐĞƉƚĂďůĞƚŽƚŚĞŽƵŶƚǇĂŶĚƐŚĂůůĐŽŵƉůǇǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ ƌĞĐŽƌĚŝŶŐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐŽĨŚĂƉƚĞƌϲϵϱ͕&^͘ƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚĐŽƉǇŽĨƚŚĞDĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵŽƌEŽƚŝĐĞƐŚĂůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ŽůůŝĞƌ ŽƵŶƚǇ WůĂŶŶĞĚ hŶŝƚ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ DŽŶŝƚŽƌŝŶŐ ƐƚĂĨĨ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ϭϱ ĚĂǇƐ ŽĨ ƌĞĐŽƌĚŝŶŐ ŽĨ ƐĂŝĚ DĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵŽƌEŽƚŝĐĞ͘ >ƐƵďƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϬ͘ϬϮ͘Ϭϴ dŚŝƐĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶǁŝůůďĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚ͞ŽƉĞŶ͟ǁŚĞŶƚŚĞĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ͞ƐƵĨĨŝĐŝĞŶĐǇ͟ŚĂƐďĞĞŶŵĂĚĞ ĂŶĚƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŝƐĂƐƐŝŐŶĞĚĂƉĞƚŝƚŝŽŶƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶŐŶƵŵďĞƌ͘dŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶǁŝůůďĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚ ͞ĐůŽƐĞĚ͟ǁŚĞŶƚŚĞƉĞƚŝƚŝŽŶĞƌǁŝƚŚĚƌĂǁƐƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƚŚƌŽƵŐŚǁƌŝƚƚĞŶŶŽƚŝĐĞŽƌĐĞĂƐĞƐƚŽƐƵƉƉůǇ ŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇ ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ ƚŽ ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶŐ Žƌ ŽƚŚĞƌǁŝƐĞ ĂĐƚŝǀĞůǇ ƉƵƌƐƵĞ ƚŚĞ ƌĞǌŽŶŝŶŐ͕ ĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚŽƌĐŚĂŶŐĞ͕ĨŽƌĂƉĞƌŝŽĚŽĨϲŵŽŶƚŚƐ͘ŶĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĚĞĞŵĞĚ͞ĐůŽƐĞĚ͟ǁŝůůŶŽƚƌĞĐĞŝǀĞ ĨƵƌƚŚĞƌƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶŐĂŶĚĂŶĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͞ĐůŽƐĞĚ͟ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŝŶĂĐƚŝǀŝƚǇƐŚĂůůďĞĚĞĞŵĞĚǁŝƚŚĚƌĂǁŶ͘Ŷ ĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĚĞĞŵĞĚ͞ĐůŽƐĞĚ͟ŵĂǇďĞƌĞͲŽƉĞŶĞĚďǇƐƵďŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŽĨĂŶĞǁĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƌĞƉĂǇŵĞŶƚŽĨ ĂůůĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĨĞĞƐĂŶĚƚŚĞŐƌĂŶƚŽĨĂĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ͞ƐƵĨĨŝĐŝĞŶĐǇ͘͟&ƵƌƚŚĞƌƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨƚŚĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚ ǁŝůůďĞƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽƚŚĞƚŚĞŶĐƵƌƌĞŶƚĐŽĚĞ͘ No public hearing has been held. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) K>>/ZKhEdz'KsZEDEd ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^^,KZ/s 'ZKtd,DE'DEdWZdDEd EW>^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y͗;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϲϯϱϴ February 1, 2019 WĂŐĞϲŽĨϭϭ ^ddDEdK&hd/>/dzWZKs/^/KE^ &KZWhZKEZYh^d WW>/EdKEdd/E&KZDd/KE EĂŵĞŽĨƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚ;ƐͿ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺŝƚǇ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ^ƚĂƚĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ/W͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ dĞůĞƉŚŽŶĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺĞůů͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ&Ăǆ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͲDĂŝůĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ĚĚƌĞƐƐŽĨ^ƵďũĞĐƚWƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ;/ĨĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞͿ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ŝƚǇ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ^ƚĂƚĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ/W͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ WZKWZdz/E&KZDd/KE ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶͬdŽǁŶƐŚŝƉͬZĂŶŐĞ͗ͬͬ >Žƚ͗ůŽĐŬ͗^ƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DĞƚĞƐΘŽƵŶĚƐĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ WůĂƚŽŽŬ͗WĂŐĞη͗WƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ/͘͘EƵŵďĞƌ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ dzWK&^t'/^WK^>dKWZKs/ ŚĞĐŬĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞƐǇƐƚĞŵ͗ Ă͘ ŽƵŶƚǇhƚŝůŝƚǇ^ǇƐƚĞŵ ď͘ ŝƚǇhƚŝůŝƚǇ^ǇƐƚĞŵ Đ͘ &ƌĂŶĐŚŝƐĞĚhƚŝůŝƚǇ^ǇƐƚĞŵ WƌŽǀŝĚĞEĂŵĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ Ě͘ WĂĐŬĂŐĞdƌĞĂƚŵĞŶƚWůĂŶƚ ;'WĂƉĂĐŝƚǇͿ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ Ğ͘ ^ĞƉƚŝĐ^ǇƐƚĞŵ dzWK&tdZ^Zs/dKWZKs/ ŚĞĐŬĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞƐǇƐƚĞŵ͗ Ă͘ ŽƵŶƚǇhƚŝůŝƚǇ^ǇƐƚĞŵ ď͘ ŝƚǇhƚŝůŝƚǇ^ǇƐƚĞŵ Đ͘ &ƌĂŶĐŚŝƐĞĚhƚŝůŝƚǇ^ǇƐƚĞŵ WƌŽǀŝĚĞEĂŵĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ Ě͘ WƌŝǀĂƚĞ^ǇƐƚĞŵ;tĞůůͿ dŽƚĂůWŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶƚŽďĞ^ĞƌǀĞĚ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ WĞĂŬĂŶĚǀĞƌĂŐĞĂŝůǇĞŵĂŶĚƐ͗ ͘ tĂƚĞƌͲWĞĂŬ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ǀĞƌĂŐĞĂŝůǇ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͘ ^ĞǁĞƌͲWĞĂŬ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ǀĞƌĂŐĞĂŝůǇ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ /ĨƉƌŽƉŽƐŝŶŐƚŽďĞĐŽŶŶĞĐƚĞĚƚŽŽůůŝĞƌŽƵŶƚǇZĞŐŝŽŶĂůtĂƚĞƌ^ǇƐƚĞŵ͕ƉůĞĂƐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƚŚĞĚĂƚĞ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞŝƐĞǆƉĞĐƚĞĚƚŽďĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. Lake Trafford Rd. Immokalee FL 34142 arol1112@yahoo.com Lake Trafford Rd. Immokalee FL 34142 32 46 29 N/A SW1/4 of SW1/4 of NE1/4 EXC HWAY N/A 00074280005 X Immokalee Water & Sewer 2.00 MGD X Immokalee Water & Sewer 134 families N/A 128 Families 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) K>>/ZKhEdz'KsZEDEd ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^^,KZ/s 'ZKtd,DE'DEdWZdDEd EW>^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y͗;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϲϯϱϴ February 1, 2019 WĂŐĞϳŽĨϭϭ EĂƌƌĂƚŝǀĞƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚ͗WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂďƌŝĞĨĂŶĚĐŽŶĐŝƐĞŶĂƌƌĂƚŝǀĞƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƐĐŚĞŵĂƚŝĐĚƌĂǁŝŶŐŽĨ ƐĞǁĂŐĞƚƌĞĂƚŵĞŶƚƉƌŽĐĞƐƐƚŽďĞƵƐĞĚĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĂƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐƚŚĞŵĞƚŚŽĚŽĨĂĨĨůƵĞŶƚ ĂŶĚƐůƵĚŐĞĚŝƐƉŽƐĂů͘/ĨƉĞƌĐŽůĂƚŝŽŶƉŽŶĚƐĂƌĞƚŽďĞƵƐĞĚ͕ƚŚĞŶƉĞƌĐŽůĂƚŝŽŶĚĂƚĂĂŶĚƐŽŝůŝŶǀŽůǀĞĚƐŚĂůů ďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĨƌŽŵƚĞƐƚƐƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚĂŶĚĐĞƌƚŝĨŝĞĚďǇĂƉƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂůĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ŽůůŝĞƌŽƵŶƚǇhƚŝůŝƚǇĞĚŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚ͗/ĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞďŽƵŶĚĂƌŝĞƐŽĨ ŽůůŝĞƌŽƵŶƚǇ͛ƐƵƚŝůŝƚǇƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐǇƐƚĞŵ͕ĂŶŽƚĂƌŝǌĞĚƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚƐŚĂůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĂŐƌĞĞŝŶŐƚŽĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞ ƚŚĞǁĂƚĞƌĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƐĞǁĂŐĞĐŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƌĞĂƚŽƚŚĞŽůůŝĞƌŽƵŶƚǇ hƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘dŚŝƐƐŚĂůůŽĐĐƵƌƵƉŽŶĐŽŵƉůĞƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƐĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐŝŶĂĐĐŽƌĚĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚ ĂůůĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞŽƵŶƚǇŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐŝŶĞĨĨĞĐƚĂƚƚŚĂƚƚŝŵĞ͘dŚŝƐƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚƐŚĂůůĂůƐŽŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂŶĂŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚ ƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞƐǇƐƚĞŵĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĐŚĂƌŐĞƐĂŶĚĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶĨĞĞƐǁŝůůďĞƉĂŝĚƚŽƚŚĞŽƵŶƚǇ hƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶƉƌŝŽƌƚŽƚŚĞŝƐƐƵĂŶĐĞŽĨďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉĞƌŵŝƚƐďǇƚŚĞŽƵŶƚǇ͘/ĨĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ͕ƚŚĞƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚ ƐŚĂůůĐŽŶƚĂŝŶĂŶĂŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚƚŽĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞƵƚŝůŝƚǇĞĂƐĞŵĞŶƚƐĨŽƌƐĞƌǀŝŶŐƚŚĞǁĂƚĞƌĂŶĚ ƐĞǁĞƌƐǇƐƚĞŵƐ͘ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨǀĂŝůĂďŝůŝƚǇĂƉĂĐŝƚǇĨƌŽŵŽƚŚĞƌWƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐ͗hŶůĞƐƐǁĂŝǀĞĚŽƌŽƚŚĞƌǁŝƐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĨŽƌĂƚ ƚŚĞƉƌĞͲĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŵĞĞƚŝŶŐ͕ŝĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐƚŽƌĞĐĞŝǀĞƐĞǁĞƌŽƌƉŽƚĂďůĞǁĂƚĞƌƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨƌŽŵĂŶǇ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌŽƚŚĞƌƚŚĂŶƚŚĞŽƵŶƚǇ͕ĂƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚĨƌŽŵƚŚĂƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŝŶŐĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞĐĂƉĂĐŝƚǇƚŽƐĞƌǀĞ ƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŚĂůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚ͘ A gravity sewer system will be used, with a gravity main extension from the existing gravity sewer main on Lake Trafford Road. N/A 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) K>>/ZKhEdz'KsZEDEd ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^^,KZ/s 'ZKtd,DE'DEdWZdDEd EW>^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y͗;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϲϯϱϴ February 1, 2019 WĂŐĞϴŽĨϭϭ KsEEdK&hE/&/KEdZK> dŚĞƵŶĚĞƌƐŝŐŶĞĚĚŽŚĞƌĞďǇƐǁĞĂƌŽƌĂĨĨŝƌŵƚŚĂƚǁĞĂƌĞƚŚĞĨĞĞƐŝŵƉůĞƚŝƚůĞŚŽůĚĞƌƐĂŶĚŽǁŶĞƌƐŽĨƌĞĐŽƌĚŽĨƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ ĐŽŵŵŽŶůǇŬŶŽǁŶĂƐͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ;^ƚƌĞĞƚĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĂŶĚŝƚǇ͕^ƚĂƚĞĂŶĚŝƉŽĚĞͿ ĂŶĚůĞŐĂůůǇĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶǆŚŝďŝƚĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚŚĞƌĞƚŽ͘ dŚĞ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚ ŚĞƌĞŝŶ ŝƐ ƚŚĞ ƐƵďũĞĐƚ ŽĨ ĂŶ ĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ƉůĂŶŶĞĚ ƵŶŝƚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ;ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺWhͿǌŽŶŝŶŐ͘tĞŚĞƌĞďǇĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚĞͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ůĞŐĂůƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞƚŚĞƌĞŽĨ͕ĂƐƚŚĞůĞŐĂů ƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞƐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇĂŶĚĂƐƐƵĐŚ͕ƚŚĞƐĞŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐĂƌĞĂƵƚŚŽƌŝǌĞĚƚŽůĞŐĂůůǇďŝŶĚĂůůŽǁŶĞƌƐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇŝŶ ƚŚĞĐŽƵƌƐĞŽĨƐĞĞŬŝŶŐƚŚĞŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƐƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉ͘dŚŝƐĂƵƚŚŽƌŝƚǇŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ͕ďƵƚŝƐŶŽƚůŝŵŝƚĞĚƚŽ͕ƚŚĞŚŝƌŝŶŐĂŶĚ ĂƵƚŚŽƌŝǌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĂŐĞŶƚƐƚŽĂƐƐŝƐƚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƉůĂŶƐ͕ƐƵƌǀĞǇƐ͕ĂŶĚƐƚƵĚŝĞƐŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇƚŽŽďƚĂŝŶǌŽŶŝŶŐ ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽŶƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘dŚĞƐĞƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞƐǁŝůůƌĞŵĂŝŶƚŚĞŽŶůǇĞŶƚŝƚǇƚŽĂƵƚŚŽƌŝǌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂĐƚŝǀŝƚǇŽŶƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ ƵŶƚŝůƐƵĐŚƚŝŵĞĂƐĂŶĞǁŽƌĂŵĞŶĚĞĚĐŽǀĞŶĂŶƚŽĨƵŶŝĨŝĞĚĐŽŶƚƌŽůŝƐĚĞůŝǀĞƌĞĚƚŽŽůůŝĞƌŽƵŶƚǇ͘ dŚĞƵŶĚĞƌƐŝŐŶĞĚƌĞĐŽŐŶŝǌĞƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĂŶĚǁŝůůďĞŐƵŝĚĞĚĂĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐůǇŝŶƚŚĞƉƵƌƐƵŝƚŽĨĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͗ ϭ͘ dŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇǁŝůůďĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚĂŶĚƵƐĞĚŝŶĐŽŶĨŽƌŵŝƚǇǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚŵĂƐƚĞƌƉůĂŶŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĂůůĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐƉůĂĐĞĚ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĂŶĚ Ăůů ĐŽŵŵŝƚŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŐƌĞĞĚ ƚŽ ďǇ ƚŚĞ ĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚ ŝŶ ĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ƉůĂŶŶĞĚ ƵŶŝƚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƌĞǌŽŶŝŶŐ͘ Ϯ͘ dŚĞůĞŐĂůƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚŚĞƌĞŝŶŝƐƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞĨŽƌĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚĂůůƚĞƌŵƐ͕ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƐĂĨĞŐƵĂƌĚƐ͕ĂŶĚ ƐƚŝƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐŵĂĚĞĂƚƚŚĞƚŝŵĞŽĨĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨƚŚĞŵĂƐƚĞƌƉůĂŶ͕ĞǀĞŶŝĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇŝƐƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚůǇƐŽůĚŝŶǁŚŽůĞŽƌŝŶ ƉĂƌƚ͕ƵŶůĞƐƐĂŶĚƵŶƚŝůĂŶĞǁŽƌĂŵĞŶĚĞĚĐŽǀĞŶĂŶƚŽĨƵŶŝĨŝĞĚĐŽŶƚƌŽůŝƐĚĞůŝǀĞƌĞĚƚŽĂŶĚƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚďǇŽůůŝĞƌŽƵŶƚǇ͘ ϯ͘ ĚĞƉĂƌƚƵƌĞĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚƉůĂŶƐŽƌĂĨĂŝůƵƌĞƚŽĐŽŵƉůǇǁŝƚŚĂŶǇƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͕Žƌ ƐĂĨĞŐƵĂƌĚƐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĨŽƌŝŶƚŚĞƉůĂŶŶĞĚƵŶŝƚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉƌŽĐĞƐƐǁŝůůĐŽŶƐƚŝƚƵƚĞĂǀŝŽůĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ>ĂŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŽĚĞ͘ ϰ͘ ůů ƚĞƌŵƐ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƉůĂŶŶĞĚ ƵŶŝƚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂů ǁŝůů ďĞ ŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĚ ŝŶƚŽ ĐŽǀĞŶĂŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƐƚƌŝĐƚŝŽŶƐǁŚŝĐŚƌƵŶǁŝƚŚƚŚĞůĂŶĚƐŽĂƐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŶŽƚŝĐĞƚŽƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚŽǁŶĞƌƐƚŚĂƚĂůůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂĐƚŝǀŝƚǇǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞƉůĂŶŶĞĚƵŶŝƚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŵƵƐƚďĞĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚŽƐĞƚĞƌŵƐĂŶĚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͘ ϱ͘ ^ŽůŽŶŐĂƐƚŚŝƐĐŽǀĞŶĂŶƚŝƐŝŶĨŽƌĐĞ͕ŽůůŝĞƌŽƵŶƚǇĐĂŶ͕ƵƉŽŶƚŚĞĚŝƐĐŽǀĞƌǇŽĨŶŽŶĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƚĞƌŵƐ͕ ƐĂĨĞŐƵĂƌĚƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƉůĂŶŶĞĚ ƵŶŝƚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕ ƐĞĞŬ ĞƋƵŝƚĂďůĞ ƌĞůŝĞĨ ĂƐ ŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇ ƚŽ ĐŽŵƉĞů ĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞ͘dŚĞŽƵŶƚǇǁŝůůŶŽƚŝƐƐƵĞƉĞƌŵŝƚƐ͕ĐĞƌƚŝĨŝĐĂƚĞƐ͕ŽƌůŝĐĞŶƐĞƐƚŽŽĐĐƵƉǇŽƌƵƐĞĂŶǇƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞƉůĂŶŶĞĚƵŶŝƚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƚŚĞŽƵŶƚǇŵĂǇƐƚŽƉŽŶŐŽŝŶŐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂĐƚŝǀŝƚǇƵŶƚŝůƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐďƌŽƵŐŚƚŝŶƚŽĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚ ĂůůƚĞƌŵƐ͕ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚƐĂĨĞŐƵĂƌĚƐŽĨƚŚĞƉůĂŶŶĞĚƵŶŝƚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ KǁŶĞƌKǁŶĞƌ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ WƌŝŶƚĞĚEĂŵĞWƌŝŶƚĞĚEĂŵĞ ^ddK&&>KZ/Ϳ KhEdzK&K>>/ZͿ ^ǁŽƌŶƚŽ;ŽƌĂĨĨŝƌŵĞĚͿĂŶĚƐƵďƐĐƌŝďĞĚďĞĨŽƌĞŵĞƚŚŝƐĚĂǇŽĨ͕ϮϬϭͺͺďǇͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ǁŚŽŝƐƉĞƌƐŽŶĂůůǇŬŶŽǁŶƚŽŵĞŽƌŚĂƐƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺĂƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ EŽƚĂƌǇWƵďůŝĐ ;EĂŵĞƚǇƉĞĚ͕ƉƌŝŶƚĞĚŽƌƐƚĂŵƉĞĚͿ Residential Parcel # 00074280005 NE Corner of Lake Trafford Rd. and N. 19th Street, Immokalee, FL 34142 Andres Boral, P.E.Residential 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) K>>/ZKhEdz'KsZEDEd ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^^,KZ/s 'ZKtd,DE'DEdWZdDEd EW>^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y͗;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϲϯϱϴ February 1, 2019 WĂŐĞϵŽĨϭϭ &ŝŶĂů^ƵďŵŝƚƚĂůZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚĨŽƌ͗ WhZĞǌŽŶĞͲŚ͘ϯ'͘ϭŽĨƚŚĞĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞŽĚĞ ŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƚŽWhͲŚ͘ϯ'͘ϮŽĨƚŚĞĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞŽĚĞ WhƚŽWhZĞǌŽŶĞͲŚ͘ϯ'͘ϭŽĨƚŚĞĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞŽĚĞ dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ^ƵďŵŝƚƚĂůZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚŝƐƚŽďĞƵƚŝůŝǌĞĚĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞWƌĞͲƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶDĞĞƚŝŶŐĂŶĚĂƚƚŝŵĞ ŽĨĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐƵďŵŝƚƚĂů͘ƚĨŝŶĂůƐƵďŵŝƚƚĂů͕ƚŚĞĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚŝƐƚŽďĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĂŶĚƐƵďŵŝƚƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĂŶƵƉͲƚŽͲĚĂƚĞ ĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘WůĞĂƐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƚŚĞƐƵďŵŝƚƚĂůŝƚĞŵƐŝŶƚŚĞĞǆĂĐƚŽƌĚĞƌůŝƐƚĞĚďĞůŽǁ͕ǁŝƚŚĐŽǀĞƌƐŚĞĞƚƐĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽ ĞĂĐŚƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ͘/ŶĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞƐƵďŵŝƚƚĂůƐǁŝůůŶŽƚďĞĂĐĐĞƉƚĞĚ͘DŽĚĞůWhŽĐƵŵĞŶƚŝƐĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞŽŶůŝŶĞĂƚ ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌĐŽƵŶƚǇĨů͘ŐŽǀͬ,ŽŵĞͬ^ŚŽǁŽĐƵŵĞŶƚ͍ŝĚсϳϲϵϴϯ͘ ZYh/ZDEd^ηK& KW/^ZYh/ZEKd ZYh/Z ŽǀĞƌ>ĞƚƚĞƌǁŝƚŚEĂƌƌĂƚŝǀĞ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĂĚĞƚĂŝůĞĚĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŽĨ ǁŚǇĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚŝƐŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇ ŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĂƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐ;ĚŽǁŶůŽĂĚůĂƚĞƐƚǀĞƌƐŝŽŶͿϭ WƌĞͲĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŵĞĞƚŝŶŐŶŽƚĞƐϭ ĨĨŝĚĂǀŝƚŽĨƵƚŚŽƌŝǌĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƐŝŐŶĞĚĂŶĚŶŽƚĂƌŝǌĞĚϭ WƌŽƉĞƌƚǇKǁŶĞƌƐŚŝƉŝƐĐůŽƐƵƌĞ&Žƌŵϭ EŽƚĂƌŝǌĞĚĂŶĚĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚŽǀĞŶĂŶƚŽĨhŶŝĨŝĞĚŽŶƚƌŽůϭ ŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĚĚƌĞƐƐŝŶŐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚϭ tĂƌƌĂŶƚǇĞĞĚ;ƐͿϭ >ŝƐƚ/ĚĞŶƚŝĨǇŝŶŐKǁŶĞƌĂŶĚĂůůƉĂƌƚŝĞƐŽĨĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚŝŽŶϭ ^ŝŐŶĞĚĂŶĚƐĞĂůĞĚŽƵŶĚĂƌǇ^ƵƌǀĞǇϭ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůZĞŶĚĞƌŝŶŐŽĨƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐϭ ƵƌƌĞŶƚĞƌŝĂůWŚŽƚŽŐƌĂƉŚƐ;ĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĨƌŽŵWƌŽƉĞƌƚǇƉƉƌĂŝƐĞƌͿǁŝƚŚ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚďŽƵŶĚĂƌǇĂŶĚ͕ŝĨǀĞŐĞƚĂƚĞĚ͕&>h&^ŽĚĞƐǁŝƚŚůĞŐĞŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ ŽŶĂĞƌŝĂů͘ ϭ ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨhƚŝůŝƚǇWƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶƐϭ ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĂƚĂZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐƉƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽ>ƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϯ͘Ϭϴ͘ϬϬϭ ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĂƚĂZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐĐŽůůĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŽĂƐŝŶŐůĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů /ŵƉĂĐƚ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚ;/^ͿƉĂĐŬĞƚĂƚƚŝŵĞŽĨƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐƐ͘ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞǁŝƚŚ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉůĂŶŶĞƌĂƚƚŝŵĞŽĨƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐƐ͘ >ŝƐƚĞĚŽƌWƌŽƚĞĐƚĞĚ^ƉĞĐŝĞƐƐƵƌǀĞǇ͕ůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶϭϮŵŽŶƚŚƐŽůĚ͘/ŶĐůƵĚĞ ĐŽƉŝĞƐŽĨƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐƐƵƌǀĞǇƐ͘ϭ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ/ŵƉĂĐƚ^ƚƵĚǇϭ ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂů^ƵƌǀĞǇϭ ^ĐŚŽŽů/ŵƉĂĐƚŶĂůǇƐŝƐƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ŝĨĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞϭ ůĞĐƚƌŽŶŝĐĐŽƉǇŽĨĂůůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐϭ ŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚǆŚŝďŝƚƐͲ&;ƐĞĞďĞůŽǁĨŽƌĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶͿн >ŝƐƚŽĨƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚĚĞǀŝĂƚŝŽŶƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ>ǁŝƚŚũƵƐƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌĞĂĐŚ;ƚŚŝƐ ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚŝƐƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞĨƌŽŵǆŚŝďŝƚͿ ŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƐŽŶŶĞǆƚƉĂŐĞ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) K>>/ZKhEdz'KsZEDEd ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^^,KZ/s 'ZKtd,DE'DEdWZdDEd EW>^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y͗;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϲϯϱϴ February 1, 2019 WĂŐĞϭϬŽĨϭϭ ZĞǀŝƐĞĚŽŶĐĞƉƚƵĂůDĂƐƚĞƌ^ŝƚĞWůĂŶϮϰ͟ǆϯϲ͟ĂŶĚKŶĞϴЪ͟ǆϭϭ͟ĐŽƉǇ KƌŝŐŝŶĂůWhĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞ͕ĂŶĚDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶϮϰ͟ǆϯϲ͟ʹKŶůǇŝĨ ŵĞŶĚŝŶŐƚŚĞWh ZĞǀŝƐĞĚWhĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚĐŚĂŶŐĞƐĐƌŽƐƐĞĚƚŚƌƵΘƵŶĚĞƌůŝŶĞĚϭ ŽƉǇŽĨKĨĨŝĐŝĂů/ŶƚĞƌƉƌĞƚĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚͬŽƌŽŶŝŶŐsĞƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶϭ Ύ/ĨůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶ/ŵŵŽŬĂůĞĞŽƌƐĞĞŬŝŶŐĂĨĨŽƌĚĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƐĞƚŽĨĞĂĐŚƐƵďŵŝƚƚĂů ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚ нdŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĞǆŚŝďŝƚƐĂƌĞƚŽďĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚŽŶĂƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂŶĚĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƉĂĐŬĞƚ͗ ǆŚŝďŝƚ͗>ŝƐƚŽĨWĞƌŵŝƚƚĞĚhƐĞƐ ǆŚŝďŝƚ͗ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ ǆŚŝďŝƚ͗DĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶͲ^ĞĞŚĂƉƚĞƌϯ͘ϭ͘ŽĨƚŚĞĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞŽĚĞ ǆŚŝďŝƚ͗>ĞŐĂůĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ ǆŚŝďŝƚ͗>ŝƐƚŽĨZĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ>ĞǀŝĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚũƵƐƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌĞĂĐŚ ǆŚŝďŝƚ&͗>ŝƐƚŽĨĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽŵŵŝƚŵĞŶƚƐ /ĨůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶZ&Dh;ZƵƌĂů&ƌŝŶŐĞDŝǆĞĚhƐĞͿZĞĐĞŝǀŝŶŐ>ĂŶĚƌĞĂƐ WƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽ>ƐƵďƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϮ͘Ϭϯ͘Ϭϴ͘͘Ϯ͘Ă͘Ϯ͘;ď͘Ϳŝ͘Đ͕͘ƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚŵƵƐƚĐŽŶƚĂĐƚƚŚĞ&ůŽƌŝĚĂ&ŽƌĞƐƚ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚϮϯϵͲ ϲϵϬͲϯϱϬϬĨŽƌŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐ͞tŝůĚĨŝƌĞDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶΘWƌĞǀĞŶƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ͘͟ W>EEZ^ʹ/E/d/&d,Wd/d/KEE^dKZKhddKd,&K>>Kt/E'Zs/tZ^͗ ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ;ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐͿ͗ŵǇ >ŽĐŬŚĞĂƌƚŽŶƐĞƌǀĂŶĐǇŽĨ^t&>͗EŝĐŚŽůĞ:ŽŚŶƐŽŶ hƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͗ƌŝĐ&ĞǇWĂƌŬƐĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ͗ĂƌƌǇtŝůůŝĂŵƐΘĂǀŝĚĞƌƌĂ ŵĞƌŐĞŶĐǇDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ͗ĂŶ^ƵŵŵĞƌƐ/ŵŵŽŬĂůĞĞtĂƚĞƌͬ^ĞǁĞƌŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͗ ŝƚǇŽĨEĂƉůĞƐ͗ZŽďŝŶ^ŝŶŐĞƌ͕WůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝƌĞĐƚŽƌKƚŚĞƌ͗ ^^K/d&^&KZWW>/d/KE WƌĞͲƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶDĞĞƚŝŶŐ͗ΨϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ WhZĞǌŽŶĞ͗ΨϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬΎƉůƵƐΨϮϱ͘ϬϬĂŶĂĐƌĞŽƌĨƌĂĐƚŝŽŶŽĨĂŶĂĐƌĞ WhƚŽWhZĞǌŽŶĞ͗Ψϴ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬΎƉůƵƐΨϮϱ͘ϬϬĂŶĂĐƌĞŽƌĨƌĂĐƚŝŽŶŽĨĂŶĂĐƌĞ WhŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚ͗Ψϲ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬΎƉůƵƐΨϮϱ͘ϬϬĂŶĂĐƌĞŽƌĨƌĂĐƚŝŽŶŽĨĂŶĂĐƌĞ ŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶĐǇZĞǀŝĞǁ͗ΨϮ͕ϮϱϬ͘ϬϬ ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĂƚĂZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐͲ/^WĂĐŬĞƚ;ƐƵďŵŝƚƚĂůĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚĂƚƉƌĞͲĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ ŵĞĞƚŝŶŐͿ͗ΨϮ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ >ŝƐƚĞĚŽƌWƌŽƚĞĐƚĞĚ^ƉĞĐŝĞƐZĞǀŝĞǁ;ǁŚĞŶĂŶ/^ŝƐŶŽƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚͿ͗Ψϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶZĞǀŝĞǁ&ĞĞƐ͗ o DĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐǇZĞǀŝĞǁ͗ΨϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΎĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĨĞĞƐƚŽďĞĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚĂƚDĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐǇDĞĞƚŝŶŐ͘ o DŝŶŽƌ^ƚƵĚǇZĞǀŝĞǁ͗ΨϳϱϬ͘ϬϬ o DĂũŽƌ^ƚƵĚǇZĞǀŝĞǁΨϭ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ x x ✔ 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) PL20190000734 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.gPacket Pg. 487Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP 100% Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. 100% Dr. Arol Bruntzman, Chairman/CEO Miguel Estrada, Vice-Chairman Allan Penick, Treasurer Ralph Pollock, Secretary 3-1-19 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.gPacket Pg. 491Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.gPacket Pg. 492Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) XXX30' BUILDING SETBACK 25' BUILDING SETBACK 30' BUILDING SETBACK 25' BUILDING SETBACK LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD 80' ROW NORTH 19TH STREET80' ROWZONING: RSF-4 USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: A-HMO USE: VACANT DETENTION AREA 0.74 ACRES 16-UNIT 2 STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT 16-UNIT, 2-STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT COMMUNITY CENTER 3,100 SF 10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) ZONING:VR USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RMF-12 USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RSF-4 USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RPUD USE: RESIDENTIAL HALF-COURT BASKETBALL PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PRESERVE 1.41 ACRES 16-UNIT, 2-STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT 16-UNIT, 2-STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT 16-UNIT 2 STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT 16-UNIT 2 STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT 16-UNIT 2 STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT 16-UNIT 2 STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT RECREATIONAL AREA RECREATIONAL AREA RECREATIONAL AREA SOLID WASTE ENCLOSURE CONCRETE PAD 24' ASPHALT DRIVE AISLE 6' WIDE LEE COUNTY ELECTRIC CO-OP ROW EASEMENT O.R. 0572, PAGE 0253 10' WIDE DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT O.R. 5197, PAGE 3087 BICYCLE RACK CONCRETE PAD (TYP.) RECREATIONAL AREA SOLID WASTE ENCLOSURE CONCRETE PAD EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK 10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER 25' BUILDING SETBACK 15' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER 6' TYPE B RESERVATION BUFFER TWO BUS PARKING SPACES 10' ACCESSORY USE STRUCTURE BUFFER RECREATIONAL AREA CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) TRACT B TRACT A ZONING: C-3 USE: COMMERCIAL RECREATIONAL AREA 1 MASTER SITE PLANEXHIBIT C1" = 40' 0 20 40 OF SHEETDATEBYREVISION DESCRIPTIONOWNER:PROJECT: DATE:ENGINEER: ANDRES BORAL, PE, MBALICENSE # 80373 FBPE # 315529911 CORKSCREW RD, STE 222, ESTERO, FL 33928WWW.BORALENGINEERING.COM(P) 239-692-0509SITE DATA TABLE SITE ADDRESS: PARCEL ID: SITE AREA: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: FUTURE LAND USE : DEVELOPMENT TYPE: BUILDING TYPE: LAKE TRAFFORD RD. & NORTH 19TH STREET, IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 00074280005 9.52 ACRES RSF-4 RPUD MED. RESID. SUBDIST. AFFORDABLE HOUSING 2 STORY CONDOS/APARTMENTS 19-111 06/19 RPUDIMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSINGALLIANCE, INC.IMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSINGALLIANCE, INC.IMMOKALEE, FLORIDA1 ZONING RESIDENTIAL VACANT LAKE TRAFFORD RD. N. 19TH ST. NORTH: WEST: SOUTH: EAST: (RSF-4, RPUD) (A-HMO) (ROW) (ROW) DENSITY ALLOWABLE UNITS FOR PROJECT SITE: 9.52 ACRES X 13.44 UNITS/ACRE = 128 UNITS NOTE 1. PRESERVE MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF A TYPE 'B' BUFFER ARE MET, A 6' WIDE BUFFER RESERVATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED ON THE MASTER PLAN. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PRESERVE DOES NOT MEET BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING, PLANTINGS WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE 6' WIDE RESERVATION TO MEET THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. THE TYPE,SIZE AND NUMBER OF SUCH PLANTINGS, IF NECESSARY, WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF INITIAL SDP AND INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE SDP. 2. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATIONS DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. PRESERVE CALCULATION ACCORDING TO LDC 3.05.07.B.1, THE REQUIRED PRESERVE AREA IS 15% OF NATIVE VEGETATION, PRIOR TO CLEARING (NOT INCLUDING EASEMENTS). (SITE AREA - EASEMENT AREA) x 15% = REQ. PRESERVE AREA (9.52 AC - 0.11 AC) X 15% = 1.41 ACRES REQ. PROVIDED: 1.41 ACRES 9/16/19 CS ADDRESSING 1ST RD. COMMENTS11/6/19 CS ADDRESSING 2ND RD. COMMENTS9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. (IFHA) A Florida Not-For Profit 501c3 public benefit Corporation. Decent, safe, affordable housing is more than a roof over our heads. When homes are decent, safe and affordable, children are healthier and they do better in school, workers are more productive, families have income for other basic need on a sustainable basis, while boosting the local economy. When rent consumes more than half of household income, there is not enough left over for healthy food, healthcare, decent cloths, childcare, early childhood learning or after school programs. In Immokalee, farmworker families, and other low-income families, that live year-round in Immokalee, struggle to afford high rent for old, dilapidated, unsafe, over-crowded trailers, often forced to spending more than half of their income on rent. The Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. was organized by an alliance of non-profit foundations, NGOs, faith-based organizations and individuals that believe that everyone deserves a chance to live in decent affordable hurricane resistant housing. IFHA’s plan is to develop 128 two and three bedroom decent, affordable, hurricane resistant, low energy, low maintenance housing units that can be rented to low income and very-low income that reside in Immokalee year round, at rents they can afford. Please help make that happen. Dr. Arol I. Buntzman Chairman / CEO Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. From Boral Engineering & Design, Inc.: The proposed affordable housing development location is a 9.52 acre property (Parcel ID: 0074280005) on the corner of Lake Trafford Road and North 19th Street in Immokalee, FL. The subject property is surrounded by several single-family residential properties and is adjacent to a multi-family property, also on Lake Trafford Road. The proposed development will consist of 8 – 16 unit buildings and a community center, along with parking, sidewalks, solid waste enclosures, bicycle racks, recreational areas, detention areas, a preserve, landscaping, and utilities (Master Site Plan will be included in the presentation). The project will be constructed in phases, with the anticipated date of occupancy to be in early 2021 (a detailed phasing plan will be submitted at SDP). Thank you for your time and consideration. Canon Sandora, E.I. Project Manager Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance RPUD – PL20190000734 January 9th, 2020 Page 1 of 4 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. Residential Planned Unit Development Evaluation Criteria PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 10.02.13.B) a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Physical characteristics of the land – The 9.52 acre property is suitable for the proposed development in terms of the characteristics of the land. The land is relatively flat, which is ideal for construction. The land is at an elevation of +/-35’ NAVD, and in Flood Zones X and X500 (low risk), and AH (1% annual chance of shallow flooding). Also, boring samples were performed on the soil determining that the Pomello Fine Sand that exists on the property were “suitable for conventional, shallow foundations to support typical two story multi-family residential structure developments provided the site is properly prepared.” (See Preliminary Exploration Geotechnical Report). Surrounding areas – The project is well suited for the area considering the surrounding areas. The surrounding properties are a mix of single family residential homes, multi- family residential apartments, and a commercial property. The 12 unit per acre multi- family development to the east is comparable to the 13.44 unit/acre development proposed. The property to the north, Faith Landing by Habitat for Humanity, is similar in its purpose to provide quality and affordable housing for low income families. Similar purpose developments and multi-family developments exists throughout the Immokalee area. Traffic and Access – A Traffic Impact Analysis was conducted by Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. concluding Lake Trafford Road was suited to accommodate for additional traffic due to the new development while maintaining an acceptable Level of Service (See Traffic Impact Study). The development proposes two access ways, one on Lake Trafford Road and one on North 19th Street. This will maximize traffic flow entering and existing the community, and prevent bottlenecking from occurring during peak hours, The recently added traffic light and the intersection of Lake Trafford Rd. and North 19 th St. will allow for vehicles that use the access point on N. 19th St. to easily access Lake Trafford Rd. at the intersection, and vice versa. Drainage – A 0.85 acre detention area has been proposed in the center of the community. A berm near the property boundary for containment with a swale inside of the berm is proposed. The proposed swale and central detention area will be connected with drainage structures and piping, which will also drain the parking lot area. A control structure will also be proposed to connect the site with the adjacent off- site drainage swale along Lake Trafford Road. Furthermore, the proposed two-story multi-family buildings minimizes roof area allows for more pervious area, including a 1.41 preserve, where water can naturally infiltrate back into the ground. Sewer, Water, and other Utilities – The Immokalee Water & Sewer District has provided a letter of availability stating the sewer and potable water connection is available for the proposed development (See Immokalee Water & Sewer Letter of 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance RPUD – PL20190000734 January 9th, 2020 Page 2 of 4 Availability). Other utilities such as electrical are available to all developments in the area. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. The property is currently under the Unified Control of Barron Collier, LLLP (See Covenant of Unified Control), with a contract to purchase by the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. There are no other pertinent agreements that are not maintained at public expense associated with the property. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, policies, and the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. Please see the Consistency Review Memorandum prepared by Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section, which concludes that “the proposed PUDZ may be deemed consistent with the IAMP and the FLUE.” Furthermore, this Project is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP), and the goals and objectives of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). GOAL 6: To Identify, Protect, Conserve and Appropriately Use Native Vegetative Communities and Wildlife Habitat. OBJECTIVE 6.1: Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Project Consistency with CCME Objective 6.1: In accordance with site preservation and native vegetation retention requirements established in CCME Policy 6.1.1 and LDC 3.05.07 B.1, the required preserve is to be 15% of the native vegetation prior to clearing, not including easement area (9.52 ac. native vegetation prior to clearing – 0.11 ac. [easement] x 15% = 1.41 ac. preserve required). GOAL 7: To Protect and Conserve the County’s Fisheries and Wildlife. OBJECTIVE 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. Project Consistency with CCME Objective 7.1: The subject property is bordered by two conservation areas to the north and northwest. The conservation areas include a 3-acre preserve associated with Habitat for Humanity’s Faith Landing development, and a 13- acre Collier County preserve. The listed species surveys identified scrub-jays in the Faith Landing conservation area and along the northern property line. The location and 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance RPUD – PL20190000734 January 9th, 2020 Page 3 of 4 management plan for the 1.41-acre on-site preserve will avoid significant modifications to the occupied scrub-jay habitat to the north, and provides a compatible buffer to the offsite conservation areas. See Preserve Management Plan for reference. (Response by Church Environmental) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed development is compatible with the internal proposed uses. The development will consist of multi-family residential buildings, with a community center building which will serve the development’s residence. Also, the proposed use of the development is compatible and complimentary to the surrounding existing and future development pattern, thereby ensuring external compatibility (See surrounding areas section above and Consistency Review Memorandum). The proposed rezone will allow for a multi-family development where such development is anticipated and appropriate. Landscape buffers and open space requirements set forth in the GMP and LDC will be provided. The on-site native vegetation preserve location and habitats were selected according to the priority criteria set forth in Section 3.05.07(A)4 and 3.05.05(A)5 of the Collier County LDC. The location of the onsite native vegetation preserve area connects to the adjacent offsite preserve area to the north and is the closest on-site location to the offsite preserve to the northeast of the site, making it the ideal location for a preserve area. The required preserve is to be 15% of the native vegetation prior to clearing, not including easement area (9.52 ac. native vegetation prior to clearing – 0.11 ac. [easement] x 15% = 1.41 ac. preserve required). e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The proposed rezoning will not modify the minimum requirement for 1.41 acres of on- site preserve area. Additionally, the RPUD will provide landscape buffers, lakes, and recreational which meet the LDC’s definition of useable open space. The two-story buildings proposed as oppose to a one-story building design reduces the area of roofs by 50%, which maximizes the open space and allows for large recreational areas that are near to every building (see Master Site Plan). f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. As outlined in the enclosed application, all required public infrastructure is available and adequate to service the RPUD. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. While the proposed development does not accommodate for expansion, as the rezoning would allow 128 units and the Master Plan shows 128 units, the property to 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance RPUD – PL20190000734 January 9th, 2020 Page 4 of 4 the west is vacant. That property as well as other vacant properties in the area could be grounds for similar developments in the area. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The project will continue to conform to all applicable PUD regulations, except where deviation is approved. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance RPUD – PL20190000734 Schedule of Deviations Page 1 of 1 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. Residential Planned Unit Development List of Requested Deviations from Land Development Code Deviation 1: Seeking a deviation from Section 4.05.04.G of the Collier County LDC which requires one space per unit plus one visitor parking space per unit for dwelling units with two bedrooms or larger, to instead reduce the amount of parking required to 1.5 space per dwelling unit of two bedrooms or larger. Justification: Immokalee farm worker and other low income families have an average of 1.5 vehicles or less per family. Farm worker families often use other means of transportation including bicycle and employer bus transportation to and from work. Bicycle racks are proposed to accommodate for the future residents. Two bus parking spaces will be provided. Onsite recreational facilities and the community center will have 10 parking spaces. Please see Oak Haven Apartments Zoning Verification Letter stating that a Parking Variance was approved for a similar affordable housing development in Collier County to allow a reduction in the required parking to 1.5 spaces/unit. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.gPacket Pg. 533Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, 9.A.4.gPacket Pg. 534Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.gPacket Pg. 536Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Church Environmental Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Listed Species Survey Report September 25, 2019 Revised November 22, 2019 1.0 Introduction The Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization with the mission of developing safe/affordable housing options for Immokalee’s farmworkers and their families. The group is proposing an affordable housing development on a 9.52-acre parcel in Immokalee, Florida (Parcel ID 00074280005). The property is bordered by Lake Trafford Road to the south and N 19 th Street to the east (see Figure 1-1). Most of the surrounding land use is residential. A commercial development is located to the southeast, and conservation areas to the northwest. The conservation areas include a 3- acre preserve associated with Habitat for Humanity’s Faith Landing development, and a 13-acre Collier County preserve (see Figure 1-2). Church Environmnetal conducted a listed species survey of the subject property. The following report details methodology and an assessment of survey results for the surveys. 2.0 Methodology Prior to the site investigation, a review was completed of existing information to assist with the determination of listed species and wetlands within the confines of the parcel. This review included Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s (FWC) action plans for listed species, FWS IPAC system, Collier County Soil Survey, along with current and historical aerial photographs. Based on this review, listed species with the potential to occur on the property were identified (see Table 2.1). The initial field review and general listed species survey were conducted on April 15, 2019. Habitat types were mapped utilizing the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) (Florida Department of Transportation 1999). Two upland vegetative associations/land uses (i.e., FLUCFCS codes) were identified on the property. The dominant habitat type on the property is Pinewoods/Herbaceous, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 4159). The remaining area is Herbaceous, Disturbed (FLUCFCS 3109). No wetlands were identified on the property. FLUCFCS 3109 (0.8 ac.) lacks canopy and mid-canopy cover, and the groundcover is comprised mostly of ruderal species. Herbaceous plants observed include Mexican clover (Richardia scabra), prostrate false buttonweed (Spermacoce prostrata), natal grass (Melinis repens), finger grass (Eustachys petraea), crabgrass (Digitaria sp.), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), beauty berry (Callicarpa Americana), and hairy beggars tick (Bidens pilosa). This area appears to have been utilized as a construction staging area for the recent improvements made to N 19th Street. The remaining 8.72 acres of property was mapped as FLUCFCS code 4159 (Pinewoods/Herbaceous, Disturbed). Canopy species observed included slash pine (Pinus elliottii) and cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto). Mid-canopy species included myrtle oak (Quercus myrtifolia) and rusty lyonia (Lyonia ferruginea). Herbaceous species recorded included Mexican clover, prostrate false buttonweed, 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Church Environmental crabgrass, ragweed, finger grass, hairy beggars tick, beauty berry, natal grass, Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), wire grass (Aristida stricta), gopher apple (Licania michauxii), smut grass (Sporobolus indicus), grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), and Southern gaura (Gaura angustifolia). The general listed species survey was conducted using field methodology by FWC, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and Collier County guidelines. The field survey consisted of pedestrian transects across the property to ensure that sufficient coverage was obtained. See Attachment 1 for FLUCFCS Map and approximate transect locations. To determine if scrub-jays utilize the subject property, a species-specific scrub jay survey was performed in accordance with Florida Scrub-Jay General Survey Guidelines and Protocols (USFWS 2007). This survey was conducted on May 3, May 5, May 8, May 9, and May 11, 2019. Scrub-jay surveys were conducted along three transects, with three playback stations established along each transect (see Figure 3-1 for station locations). Five surveys occurred at these locations using a high-quality recording of Florida scrub-jay territorial scolding to attract scrub-jays. Per the guidelines, field surveys were carried out on calm, clear days beginning about one hour after sunrise and terminated before midday heat or wind. The property is within the consultation area for the Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus) (FBB). To determine if FBBs roost on the property, all trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) equal to or greater than 10 inches, all snags with a DBH of greater than or equal to 8 inches, and all utility poles (collectively referred to as uprights) were visually surveyed for cavities. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Church Environmental Table 2.1 Listed species that could potentially occur on-site. Scientific Name Common Name State Status Federal Status Observed Gopherus polyphemus Gopher tortoise Threatened Candidate N Drymarchon corais couperi Eastern indigo snake Federally Threatened Threatened N Aphelocoma coerulescens Florida scrub-jay Federally Threatened Threatened Y Athene cunicularia Burrowing owl Threatened N Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald eagle NL *Other N Puma concolor coryi Florida panther Federally Endangered Endangered N Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker Federally Endangered Endangered N Polyborus plancus audubonii Audubon’s crested caracara Federally Threatened Threatened N Eumops floridanus Florida bonneted bat Federally Endangered Endangered N Cyrtopodium punctatum Cigar orchid Endangered NL N Encyclia cochleata Clamshell orchid Endangered NL N Encyclia tampensis Butterfly orchid NL NL N Pteroglossaspis ecristata Giant orchid Threatened NL N Polyrrhiza lindenii Ghost orchid Endangered NL N Tillandsia utriculata Giant wild-pine Endangered NL N Tillandsia balbisiana Inflated wild-pine Threatened NL N Tillandsia fasciculata Stiffed-leaved wild- pine Endangered NL N Tillandsia flexuosa Twisted air plant Threatened NL N Andropogon arctatus Pine-woods bluestem Threatened NL N Calopogon multiflorus Many-flowered grasspink Threatened NL N Passiflora pallens Pine passionflower Endangered NL N Asclepias curtissii Curtis’s milkweed Endangered NL N 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Church Environmental 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Church Environmental 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Church Environmental A summary of the field survey dates and weather conditions can be found in Table 2-1. Table 2-1. Dates, Times, and Weather Conditions for Listed Species Surveys Date Time Weather Conditions April 15, 2019 1200 - 1500 Sunny, Winds 5-8 mph, 75-80℉ May 3, 2019 0730 - 0930 Mostly sunny, Winds 4 – 6 mph, 75-80℉ May 5, 2019 0800 - 0915 Mostly sunny, Winds 5 – 6 mph, 75-80℉ May 8, 2019 0730 - 0900 Sunny, Winds 2 – 4 mph, 70-75℉ May 9, 2019 0745 - 0915 Mostly sunny, Winds 4 – 5 mph, 75-80℉ May 11, 2019 0730 - 0900 Partly sunny, Winds 2 – 4 mph, 70-75℉ 3.0 Results The Collier County Soil Survey indicates the property occurs on Pomello fine sand (Soil Unit 15), which is classified as a non-hydric soil. A review of historical aerials shows the understory and mid-canopy were cleared during the 2007/2008-time frame. Two upland vegetative associations/land uses (i.e., FLUCFCS codes) currently exist on the property. The dominant habitat type is Pinewoods/Herbaceous, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 4159, 8.72± acres). The remaining 0.8 acres is Herbaceous, Disturbed (FLUCFCS 3109). See Figure 3-1 for the FLUCFCS map prepared for the property. No listed plants or wetlands were identified. Representative plant species can be found in Table 3-1. For wildlife, seventeen bird species were identified, including two Florida scrub-jays observed along the northern property line (see Table 3-2). The Florida scrub-jay is listed as a threatened species. No FBB roost was found during any of the surveys. The two scrub-jays were initially noted during the April 15 general listed species survey, along the southern edge of the 3-acre Faith Landing Preserve. This preserve is mostly scrub oak-dominated scrub habitat. The scrub-jays were observed for approximately 30 minutes. One of the jays briefly flew into a pine along the northern perimeter of the property. The scrub-jays were observed on the Faith Landing Preserve during all five species-specific surveys. The scrub-jays only responded to the on-site playback stations during the first survey (May 3). During this survey the jays responded to calls played at Stations 1, 2 and 4. Stations 1 and 2 attracted the jays to the two on-site locations shown in Figure 3-2. The location near the north property line and in the center of the property is the same pine tree a scrub-jay was briefly observed in on April 15. When responding to Station 4, a jay briefly flew into two separate snags to the west. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Church Environmental Table 3-1. Plant species observed Ambrosia artemisiifolia Ragweed Aristida stricta Wire grass Bidens pilosa Hairy beggars tick Callicarpa Americana Beauty berry Callicarpa americana Beauty berry Digitaria sp. Crabgrass Eustachys petraea Finger grass Gaura angustifolia Southern gaura Licania michauxii Gopher apple Lyonia ferruginea Rusty lyonia Melinis repens Natal grass Paspalum notatum Bahia grass Pinus elliottii Slash pine Quercus myrtifolia Myrtle oak Richardia scabra Mexican clover Sabal palmetto Cabbage palm Spermacoce prostrata Prostrate false buttonweed Sporobolus indicus Smutgrass Vitis rotundifolia Grape vine Table 3-1. Wildlife species observed Aphelocoma coerulescens Florida scrub-jay Buteo jamaicensis Red-headed hawk Cathartes aura Turkey vulture Coragyps atratus Black vulture Corvus ossifragus Fish crow Cyanocitta cristata Blue jay Dryocopus pileatus Pileated woodpecker Elanoides forficatu Swallow-tailed kite Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead shrike Melanerpes erythrocephalus Red-headed woodpecker Mimus polyglottos Northern mocking bird Picoides pubescens Downy woodpecker Quiscalus quiscula quiscula Common grackle Streptopelia decaocto Eurasian collared dove Sturnella magna Meadow lark Sturnus vulgaris European starling Zenaida macroura Mourning dove 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Church Environmental 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Church Environmental 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Church Environmental 4.0 Discussion The Florida scrub-jay lives only in frequently-burned xeric communities (scrub habitat) of Florida. These vegetation communities are characterized by well-drained, often nutrient poor, sandy soils with an abundance of low growing scrub oaks, including sand live oak (Quercus geminata), Chapman oak (Q. chapmanii), myrtle oak (Q. myrtifolia), and scrub oak (Q. inopina). Scrub oak acorns are one of their most important foods (FWS 1999). The presence of scrub oaks, no matter how sparsely distributed, is the key indicator of "scrub" habitat. No scrub oaks were observed on the property. High tree cover, such as the pines on-site and on the adjacent parcel to the west, provide poor quality scrub-jay habitat and reduces the quality of adjacent habitat. Avian predators are more common and less detectable in areas with high tree cover (https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/bird/apco/all.html). This is likely why the jays were only observed briefly outside of the two preserves to the northwest. A purpose of the scrub-jay species-specific survey is to determine the extent of occupied scrub-jay habitat. The results of this survey indicate the jay’s primary territory range is within the two adjacent preserves to the northwest. A small portion of the northwest perimeter of the property may also qualify as occupied habitat. To avoid and minimize direct and indirect effects to occupied scrub-jay habitat, a buffer should be incorporated into the site plan along the northern property line. In addition to a buffer, passive uses, such as surface water management, would be appropriate in the northern portion of the property. Further measures may be needed to address potential indirect effects to occupied scrub-jay habitat. Examples include the following:  Initiate construction outside the nesting season (March 1 to June 30)  Scrub oak plantings  Pet restrictions for future tenants  Educational material for contractors and tenants 5.0 GMP Consistency This Project is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP), and the goals and objectives of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). GOAL 6: To Identify, Protect, Conserve and Appropriately Use Native Vegetative Communities and Wildlife Habitat. OBJECTIVE 6.1: Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Project Consistency with CCME Objective 6.1: In accordance with site preservation and native vegetation retention requirements established in CCME Policy 6.1.1 and LDC 3.05.07 B.1, 15% of the site (9.52 ac. native vegetation prior to clearing – 0.11 ac. [easement] x 15% = 1.41 ac. preserve required). GOAL 7: To Protect and Conserve the County’s Fisheries and Wildlife. OBJECTIVE 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. Project Consistency with CCME Objective 7.1: The subject property is bordered by two conservation areas to the north and northwest. The conservation areas include a 3-acre preserve associated with Habitat for Humanity’s Faith Landing development, and a 13-acre Collier County preserve. The listed species surveys identified 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Church Environmental scrub-jays in the Faith Landing conservation area and along the northern and western property line. The location and management plan for the 1.41-acre on-site preserve will avoid significant modifications to the occupied scrub-jay habitat to the north, and provides a compatible buffer to the offsite conservation areas. 6.0 Summary The subject property is surrounded by residential development. Additional adjacent land uses include a commercial development, and two conservation areas to the northwest. No wetlands or other surface waters were identified on the property. Two Florida scrub-jays were observed along the northern property line during the general listed species survey. A follow up species-specific scrub-jay survey was conducted to identify the extent of occupied habitat. The scrub-jays were observed on the Faith Landing Preserve, a scrub oak-dominated scrub habitat, during all five species-specific surveys. The scrub-jays only responded to the on-site playback stations during the first survey. The jays reluctant use of the property is likely due to poor habitat and lack of scrub oaks. To avoid significant modifications to the occupied scrub-jay habitat to the north, the site plan should incorporate an appropriate buffer and compatible uses in the northern portion of the property. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Church Environmental Attachment 1 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Church Environmental 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Church Roberts 1807 Monte Vista St Fort Myers, Fl 33901 (239)888-6997 Church has over 25 years of environmental consulting experience. Working on all initial aspects of projects, he is instrumental in obtaining permits from local, state and federal regulatory agencies for projects that may involve submerged lands, sensitive lands, critical habitat, protected species and wetlands. He has extensive project management experience and is active in the environmental professional community. He is a former president of the Southwest Florida Association of Environmental Professionals and a former chair of the Estero Bay Agency for Bay Management (ABM). Church’s management skills have been enhanced through the participation in several leadership programs. Church’s graduate education at the University of West Florida within the Department of Coastal Zone and Natural Resource Studies allowed him to study and complete several laboratory and field exercises under the direction of prominent experts including Dr. James P. Morgan (Coastal Morphology), Dr. Paul Hamilton (Animal Behavior), Dr. Gerald Moshiri (Wetlands Ecology), and Dr. Eric Fitch (Coastal Law). Relevant Experience  Lee County Port Authority - Served as project manager for multiple Port Authority General Environmental and Planning Management contracts and was lead environmental consultant for the 10,000-acre Mid-Field Terminal Complex. Designed, prepared bid specifications and provided construction oversight for the Port Authority’s award winning 7,000-acre Mitigation Park. The mitigation plan consisted of 500 acres of wetland creation, monitoring, controlled burns and maintenance. Projects conducted under the Port Authority’s General Environmental and Planning Management contracts included NPDES compliance, NEPA documentation, Section 4F analysis, and a Wildlife Hazard Assessment.  South Florida Water Management District – Served as project manager for the post-restoration monitoring of Audubon’s Crested Caracara within the Kissimmee River Restoration Project Area (2000-2003). Project manager for C-43 Reservoir caracara monitoring program (2015-2017).  Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program (CHNEP) – In 2018 CHNEP awarded a grant to Church Environmental to evaluate the use of a UAV for surveying potential rookery islands in the Caloosahatchee River. The rookery islands surveyed included Manatee Sign Island and Lenore Island. The UAV was able to capture high-quality video and photographs at both sites. Nest counts for Manatee Sign Island identified 34 great egret nests and 3 great blue heron nests. Nest counts for Lenore Island included 420 wood stork nests, 35 great egret nests, 14 brown pelican nests, 8 anhinga nests, 6 great blue heron nests, and 2 roseate spoonbill nests. No group or individual  Coral Reef Commons Habitat Conservation Plan - Lead environmental consultant for the Coral Reef Commons Habitat Conservation Plan. Located in Miami-Dade County, the HCP and Incidental Take Permit covered eight wildlife species and fourteen plant species. The HCP required several species- specific surveys (including intensive bat acoustic surveys), a detailed preserve management plan, prescribed burn plan, and BMPs for construction, preserve management, and community (residential and commercial) operations.  Lee County Corkscrew and Green Meadows Wellfields Water Use Permitting and Ecological Monitoring - Conducted the environmnetal permitting required for the design and construction of a 5 MGD expansion of the Corkscrew Wellfield for Lee County Utilities. Wetlands within a 40,000-acre study area were evaluated to assess effects resulting from historic and proposed wellfield operations. Upland/wetland mapping and tabulated land use changes were developed based on georeferenced historical aerials (1944, 1958, 1966, 1980 and 2007). A functional assessment was conducted to quantify wetland impacts and mitigation, and an ecological monitoring program was designed to monitor the effects of the permitted wellfield operations.  Babcock Ranch Community - Lead environmental consultant responsible for the environmental entitlements required for the 22,300-acre Babcock Ranch Community. The entitlements included a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, DRI, USACOE Section 404 Permit, State (SFWMD) Environmnetal Resource Permit, and USFWS Section 7 Consultation and Biological Opinion. The 13,000-acre mitigation plan included wetland creation, wetland restoration, upland and wetland preservation, prescribed burning and monitoring.  FDOT District One - Project manager for multiple FDOT District One Environmental Permit contracts. Representative projects include wildlife crossing evaluations for 30 miles of I-4 in Polk County and 10 miles of Alligator Alley in Collier County, environmental permitting for multiple sections of U.S. 41 and S.R. 29, S.R. 78 in Lee County, Metro Parkway Extension in Lee County, Rest Areas along Alligator Alley in Collier County, U.S. 17 in Charlotte and Desoto Counties, and S.R. 70 in Manatee County.  Florida Power & Light (FPL&L) – Representative projects for FP&L include the 425-acre Babcock Ranch Solar Facility, 4,700-acre Hendry County Next Generation Clean Energy Center, Glades County 1,000-acre due diligence, and evaluation of multiple parcels for conservation and wetland 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) mitigation potential. Additional energy related experience includes Federal Communications Commission (FCC) National Environmnetal Policy Act (NEPA) Screening Reports for communication towers and environmnetal permitting for FGCU’s 72-acre solar field. Relevant Certifications/Credentials  2060 FTP Community Livability, Environmental Stewardship & Mobility Committee Member (2010)  Water Quality Trading AWRA Florida Section Meeting (Presenter, 2010 & 2013)  Florida Water Resources from Lake Okeechobee to the Estuaries: A Water Management Balancing Act AWRA (Presenter 2016)  Essentials of Getting an ERP Marco Island Permit Summer School (Presenter, 2010 – 2016)  Bird Strike North America Conference (Presenter, April 2010)  Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Cooperative Conservation Blueprint Committee (2009 – 2013)  Charlotte Harbor NEP Reservoir Workshop (Presenter, April 2009)  Estero Bay Land Management Workshop (Presenter, August 2008)  FHWA NEPA and Transportation Decision Making (May 2008)  National Mitigation and Ecosystem Bank Conference (April 2007)  Project Management Bootcamp, PSMJ Resources Inc. (August 2006)  Macroinvertebrate sampling techniques and identification, David W. Ceilley, Faculty Research Associate, Florida Gulf Coast University (August 2006)  American Planning Association Conference (Presenter, October 2005)  Florida Airports Environmental and Noise Conference (Presenter, August 2005)  Estero Bay Environmental Initiatives Conference (Event Coordinator, October 2004)  Florida Hydric Soil Morphology Seminar, Dr. Victor W. Carlisle (March 2000)  Plant Identification Workshop, Dr. David W. Hall (March 1999)  Shorebird Identification Seminar, Keewaydin Island (January 1998)  Plant Identification Workshop, Dr. David W. Hall (April 1996)  Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation and Management Training, Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc. (February 1995) Experience Church Environmnetal, Principal Ecologist, June 2017 to Present  State Environmental Resource Permitting  Section 404 Permitting  Mitigation Banking  Expert Witness  Habitat Mapping & Wetland Delineations  Protected Species Surveys  USFWS Consultation Johnson Engineering, Principal Ecologist/Director, August 1994 to June 2017  Director of Environmental Market Group for 17 years  Marketing and Project Management  State Environmental Resource Permitting  Section 404 Permitting  Mitigation Design, Implementation and Monitoring  Mitigation and Conservation Banking  Expert Witness  Habitat Mapping & Wetland Delineations  Protected Species Surveys  USFWS Consultation Education 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) BA (History), Florida State University, 1988 MPA (Coastal Zone and Natural Resource Studies), University of West Florida, 1992 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) IMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, INC. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Project Location: 11130 Immokalee Road Naples, Florida 34120 TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT September 24th, 2019 Prepared by: _______________________ Andres Boral, PE, MBA Florida License Number: 80373 Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. andres@boralengineering.com (P) 239-692-0509 9911 Corkscrew Rd. Ste. #222 Estero, FL 33928 Digitally signed by Andres Boral DN: cn=Andres Boral, email=andres@boralengineering .com, o=Boral Engineering and Design, Inc., ou=Professional Engineer License No: 80373, c=US Date: 2019.09.27 12:23:23 -04'00' 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 2 CONCLUSIONS This report concludes that the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. Residential Development will create an impact of 3% increase in peak hour trips on Lake Trafford Road, but this increase will not have a negative impact on Lake Trafford Road or the surrounding roadway network. It was verified that all roadways, within the project’s area of impact, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the traffic associated with the development of a 128 unit, multi-family housing development and the network will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for 2021 project build-out traffic conditions. Furthermore, the report concludes that the project will not create any transportation deficiencies that need to be mitigated. Roadway Level Of Service Determinations Lake Trafford Road (Carson Rd. & SR 29) is classified as a two lane, undivided collector road having an adopted performance standard to provide a level of service LOS “C”. A maximum service volume capacity of 800 VPH for peak hour, peak direction, has been established for this roadway link. As concluded, that Lake Trafford Road will have a 2021 project build-out traffic demand of 555 VPHPD and a v/c ratio of 0.72. Site-Related Improvements Trips will be split equally between two access points, one on Lake Trafford Road and one on North 19th Street. Banked trips will be reduced because the farm-worker families often use bicycle and bus transportation, instead of passenger vehicles. The peak hour right-in (peak direction) turns on Lake Trafford Road will be 11, and the peak hour left-in (peak direction) turns on North 19th St. will be 13 (See Exhibit 1). The speed limits are 35 mph on Lake Trafford Road, and 30 mph on North 19 Street. Due to the limited number of peak hour in-turns and low speed limits, no turn lane improvements are proposed for this project. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 3 PROJECT SCOPE The subject property (Parcel # 00074280005) is 9.52 acres and is currently undeveloped. The property is located at the northeast corner of Lake Trafford Road and North 19th Street. This project proposes a 128 unit residential development which will be affordable housing for farmworker families. The residential development will include 8 – 16 unit buildings, a 4,000 square foot community center, a laundry mat building, parking for the residence, and recreational park areas. PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC Projected traffic for this project is estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. ITE has compiled traffic data at similar Land Uses and is relied upon in estimating this project’s traffic impact. It was concluded that Land Use Code “Multi-Family Housing, Low-Rise” (LUC 220), defined as “apartments, townhouses, and condominiums located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units and that have one or two levels” is most appropriate for estimating the project traffic. The AM and PM trips were calculated using the Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic. Trips Generated by the proposed Residential Development: Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, the estimated trip generation by the proposed development will be calculated using Land Use Code “Multi-Family Housing, Low-Rise” (LUC 220). Since the proposed development will be for affordable housing for farmworker families, who use means of transportation such as bicycle, bus, and carpooling readily which will significantly reduce the number of trips, a factor or 0.5 will be used to determine the “Dwelling Units Equivalent”. Variables Number of Dwelling Units = 128 Units Affordable Housing * Farmworker Housing Adjustment = Dwelling Units * (0.5) = 64 Dwelling Unit Equivalent Unit of Measure = 1 Dwelling Unit Units “X” = 64 Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.: Ln(T) = 0.95 Ln(X) - 0.51 Fitted Curve = 31 Trip Directional Distribution: 23% entering (7), 77% exiting (24) Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.: Ln(T) = 0.89 Ln(X) - 0.02 Fitted Curve = 40 Trip Directional Distribution: 63% entering (25), 37% exiting (15) Weekday, Daily Trips: (X) T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 Fitted Curve = 443 Trips Directional Distribution: 50% entering (221), 50% exiting (222) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 4 Table 1., Trip Generations for the Multi-Family Housing, Low-Rise Residential Development Trip Ends Entering Trips Exiting Trips Weekday Peak Hour, AM 31 7 24 Weekday Peak Hour, PM 40 25 15 Daily Trip, Weekday 443 221 222 The report concludes that the project will generate less than 50 net new total 2-way AM and less than 50 net new total 2-way PM peak hour trips. As such, the report investigates the traffic impacts associated with the project based upon the criteria set forth by the Collier County Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines for a small-scale study. EXISTING + COMMITTED ROADWAY CONDITIONS Lake Trafford Road is classified as a two lane, undivided collector road having an adopted minimum performance standard Level of Service LOS “D”. A maximum service volume capacity of 800 VPH for peak hour, peak direction, has been established for this roadway link. Lake Trafford Road has a posted speed limit of 35 MPH. ANTICIPATED TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION The project’s traffic was distributed to the surrounding roadway network based upon logical means of ingress/egress, along with current and future traffic patterns in the area. Exhibit 1, shows the traffic distribution and anticipated trip distribution for the proposed development. AREA OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County’s’ 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e. if the project’s traffic is 2% or more of a roadway’s adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that roadway link.) Table 3., describes the project distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Exhibit 1 shows that Lake Trafford Road will be significantly impacted due to the trips generated by this development with a PM peak hour trips of 25 and maximum service volume capacity of 800 VPH, equating to a 3% increase. Since the increase is greater than 2%, trips will be banked on the adjacent link, SR 29, from 9th Ave. to CR 29A North. Exhibit 2 shows that SR 29, from 9th Ave. to CR 29A North will be insignificantly impacted due to the trips generated by this development with an AM and PM peak hour trips of 14 and maximum service volume capacity of 900 VPH, equating to a 1.5% increase. Since the link will be have less than a 2% increase in peak hour trips, additional links will not need to have trips banked. PROJECT BUILD-OUT CONDITIONS In order to establish 2021 traffic conditions, traffic count data was used for peak hour conditions, peak direction, and applied an annual growth rate. Project generated traffic was then added to the 2021 background traffic. Table 5., reflects the results of the roadway Level of Service (LOS) evaluations. As determined, all impacted roadways will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 5 Table 2., Level of Service Concurrency Report ID # PROJ # ROAD NAME EXISTING ROAD MIN. STD PEAK DIR. CNT. STA. PEAK HR. PEAK DIR. SERVICE VOLUME 2016 PEAK HR. PEAK DIR. VOLUME 2017 PEAK HR. PEAK DIR. VOLUME 2018 PEAK HR. PEAK DIR. VOLUME LOS 47.0 99903 LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD 2U D E 609 800 470 470 500 C FROM: CARSON ROAD TO: SR 29 85.0 SR 29 2U D S 663 900 620 620 630 D FROM: 9TH STREET TO: CR 29A NORTH Table 3., Project’s Areas of Impact ID # ROAD NAME ROAD PK DIR. SERV. VOL. LOS SERVICE PK DIRECTION VOLUME PROJECT TRAFFIC PROJECT PK HR. PK DIR. PROJECT PK HR. PROJECT PK HR. NON-PK DIR. PROJECT NON-PK IMPACT PERCENT SIGNIFICANT CLASS LOS (VPHPD)% DIST.(VPHPD)PK DIR.(VPH)DIR.STANDARD IMPACT IMPACT 47.0 LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD 2U D 800 95%24 E 1 W 2%3.000%YES FROM: CARSON ROAD TO: SR 29 85.0 SR 29 2U D 900 60%14 S 10 N 2%1.556%NO FROM: 9TH STREET TO: CR 29A NORTH Table 4., Traffic Link Volume ID # ROAD NAME ROAD PK DIR. SERV. VOL. 2018 AUIR TRAFFIC AUIR PEAK GROWTH RATE PER PER GROWTH RATE METHOD 2021 PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION BACKGROUND TRIP BANK PER VESTED TRIPS METHOD 2021 PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION BACKGROUND PER VESTED TRIPS CLASS LOS (VPHPD)DIR.AUIR (VPHPD)(VPHPD)(VPHPD) 47.0 LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD 2U D 500 E 3.14% 549 24 573 FROM: CARSON ROAD TO: SR 29 85.0 SR 29 2U D 630 S 2.00% 669 14 683 FROM: 9TH STREET TO: CR 29A NORTH Table 5., Traffic Link Volume & Capacity Analysis ID # ROAD NAME ROAD PK DIR. SERV. VOL. 2018 PEAK HR. PEAK DIR. 2021 PEAK HR. PEAK DIR. BACK- GROUND BACK- GROUND PEAK 2021 PEAK HR. PEAK DIR. BACK- GROUND PROJECT PEAK HR. PEAK DIR. PROJECT PEAK PROJECT PEAK HR NON-PEAK DIRECTION PROJECT NON-PEAK 2021 BUILD-OUT PEAK HR. PEAK DIR. SERV. VOL. PEAK HR. PEAK DIR. 2021 BUILD-OUT PEAK HR. PEAK DIR. 2021 BUILD-OUT PEAK HR. PEAK DIR. CLASS LOS (VPHPD)(VPHPD)DIR.LOS (VPHPD)DIR.(VPH)DIR.(VPHPD)(VPHPD)(V/C RATIO)LOS 47.0 LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD 2U D 500 549 E C 24 E 1 W 573 800 0.72 C FROM: CARSON ROAD TO: SR 29 85.0 SR 29 2U D 630 669 S D 14 S 10 N 683 900 0.76 D FROM: 9TH STREET TO: CR 29A NORTH 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) NORTH 19TH ST.LAKE TRAFFORD RD.5%95%50%45%OFSHEETDATE BY REVISION DESCRIPTIONOWNER:PROJECT:DATE:ENGINEER: ANDRES BORAL, PE, MBALICENSE # 80373 FBPE # 315529911 CORKSCREW RD, STE 222, ESTERO, FL 33928WWW.BORALENGINEERING.COM(P) 239-692-050919-11106/19RPUDIMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSINGALLIANCE, INC.IMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSINGALLIANCE, INC.IMMOKALEE, FLORIDA2211" = 100'050 100XX%LEGEND= TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONTRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONEXITING LEFT-OUTWEEKDAY AM PEAK = 11WEEKDAY PM PEAK = 7EXITING RIGHT-OUTWEEKDAY AM PEAK = 1WEEKDAY PM PEAK = 1ENTERING LEFT-INWEEKDAY AM PEAK = 0WEEKDAY PM PEAK = 1ENTERING RIGHT-INWEEKDAY AM PEAK = 3WEEKDAY PM PEAK = 11EXITING LEFT-OUTWEEKDAY AM PEAK = 12WEEKDAY PM PEAK = 7ENTERING LEFT-INWEEKDAY AM PEAK = 4WEEKDAY PM PEAK = 13EXHIBIT 19.A.4.gPacket Pg. 591Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, S R 2 9 LAKE TRAFFORD RD.40%60%OFSHEETDATE BY REVISION DESCRIPTIONOWNER:PROJECT:DATE:ENGINEER: ANDRES BORAL, PE, MBALICENSE # 80373 FBPE # 315529911 CORKSCREW RD, STE 222, ESTERO, FL 33928WWW.BORALENGINEERING.COM(P) 239-692-050919-11106/19RPUDIMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSINGALLIANCE, INC.IMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSINGALLIANCE, INC.IMMOKALEE, FLORIDA2221" = 100'050 100XX%LEGEND= TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONTRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONEXITING LEFT-OUTWEEKDAY AM PEAK = 9WEEKDAY PM PEAK = 6EXITING RIGHT-OUTWEEKDAY AM PEAK = 14WEEKDAY PM PEAK = 8EXITING LEFT-INWEEKDAY AM PEAK = 4WEEKDAY PM PEAK = 14ENTERING RIGHT-INWEEKDAY AM PEAK = 3WEEKDAY PM PEAK = 10EXHIBIT 29.A.4.gPacket Pg. 592Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, V:\BORAL ENG & DESIGN\CAD\2019\19-111\LETTER FILES\TRAFFIC\19-111 TIS METHODOLOGY.doc APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date: 9/20/2019 Time: TBA Location: N/A Via E-mail People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Growth Management 2) Canon Sandora, E.I., Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. 3) 4) 5) Study Preparer: Preparer’s Name and Title: Canon Sandora, E.I, Project Manager Organization: Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 9911 Corkscrew Rd., Estero FL, 33928. (239)-692-6738 Reviewer(s): Reviewer’s Name & Title: Michael Sawyer, Transportation Reviewer Organization & Telephone Number: Collier County Transportation Planning Department (239)-252-2926 Reviewer’s Name & Title: N/A Organization & Telephone Number: N/A Applicant: Applicant’s Name: Andres Boral, P.E., Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. Address: 9911 Corkscrew Rd. #222, Estero, FL 33928 Telephone Number: 239-692-0509 Proposed Development: Name: Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. Residential Development Location: NW Corner of Lake Trafford Rd. and N. 19 th St., Naples, FL 34120 Land Use Type: 99 – Acreage Not Zoned Agricultural ITE Code #: LUC 220 – Multi-Family Housing, Low-Rise Proposed number of development units: 128 Other: Description: The Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. is proposing a residential development on a 9.52 acre property on Lake Trafford Rd., which will contain (8) 16-unit 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) V:\BORAL ENG & DESIGN\CAD\2019\19-111\LETTER FILES\TRAFFIC\19-111 TIS METHODOLOGY.doc buildings. This will be affordable housing to be used in large majority by farm-worker families and other low-income families in the Immokalee area. Zoning Existing: RSF-4 Comprehensive plan recommendation: RPUD to up to 14 units/acre. Requested: RPUD Findings of the Preliminary Study: The Residential Development will create an impact of 3% increase in peak hour trips on Lake Trafford Road, but this increase will not have a negative impact on Lake Trafford Road or the surrounding roadway network. Study Type: Small Scale TIS Minor TIS Major TIS Study Area: Boundaries: Lake Trafford Road, from Carson Rd. to SR 29 (ID: #47) Additional intersections to be analyzed: Lake Trafford Rd. and SR29 Horizon Year(s): 2021 Analysis Time Period(s): 2019 Future Off-Site Developments: N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE, Trip Generation Manual, 10 th Edition Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: Reduction Factor: 0.5 (Farmworker/Low income families often use other means of transportation, such as bus and bicycle.) Pass-by trips: 500 (2018) Internal trips (PUD): 24 Transmit use: N/A Other: N/A Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: N/A Methodology & Assumptions: Non-site traffic estimates: 549 (2021) Site-trip generation: 24 (Peak Hour Peak Direction) Trip distribution method: Based on direction of Arterial Road (East) Traffic assignment method: Vested Trips (AUIR) Traffic growth rate: 3.14% 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Special Features: ∴(from preliminary study or prior experience) Acciden能l軸onsこN/A S唾眺碓s惚職能: 527’練Q恥a鋤返SS ㊤皿厳韮e T瞥翻Rd二的i軸鮒維細臨む盆Ce敏鼠登Q靴的.珪卑救. t㊦主掘ers鉄索io撞主㊥賠電車隠:辿些 Acoe終Ioea龍阻& con丘guration: 1 on Lake‘ Tra節ord Rd. and l on,N. 19th st, 恥融通鯵OO舶勤し:艶やS痔腺 Signal system location & progression needs: Intersection of Lcke Trafford Rd. and N. 土壁_墨工の阻一甜幕,壬掲鵡龍郷留盤e鉄兜:心替り捜CeゆerU盤近況2酌、扇覗8 1珊℃谷峨aCe御井咄鎚孔勧.加増s 9 S勝、fi隣〕G㊦mm鵬産ty C朝雨er狐d l H/C sl弧ee for Comnmmity C鏡知慮寸l), 勘衰a患飢脱鵜S二 B飼se皿型旗_ P五〇r抽賦p鶴鳴: Ac∞SS POlicy and jurisdiction: Review pifOOeSSこ_ 良eq職圭鯵職e駐機 M isce醜聞eo職S : 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) please allow 3 days for processing. bold type FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) LEGAL DESCRIPTION (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s)(attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) (as applicable, if already assigned) (if applicable) (for existing projects/sites only) LOCATION MAP (if applicable) Please see Survey with Legal Description 00405440003 2300 County Barn Rd.,Naples,FL 34112 First Haitian Alliance Church N/A N/A S08 T50 R26 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) A FOR STAFF USE ONLY F Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED N/A Andres Boral, P.E., Canon Sandora, E.I. 239-692-6738 canon@boralengineering.com 00405440003 01/27/2020 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com IMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, INC. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP: 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com List Identifying Owner and All Parties in Corporation Owner: Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP (See Certificate of Merger) Parties: Barron G. Collier III, Co-Trustee Juliet C. Sproul, Co-Trustee Lamar G. Villere, Co-Trustee Frances G. Villere, Co-Trustee Christopher D. Villere, Co-Trustee Mathilde Villere Currence, Co-Trustee Phyllis G. Alden, Co-Trustee Donna G. Keller, Co-Trustee Contract Purchaser: Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. Parties: Dr. Arol Bruntzman, Chairmain/CEO Miguel Estrada, Vice-Chairman Allan Penick, Treasurer Ralph Pollock, Secretary 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Scanned with CamScanner 128 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Worksheet is required to be completed by the Applicant only if the project is to be phased:Unit Type Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ YearsSFMFMHCGTotals by YrGrandTotalGrand TotalInsert totals by unit type by years.Unit Types:SF = Single FamilyMF = Multi-Family/Apartments MH = Mobile HomesC = Condo/Co-OpG = GovernmentEXAMPLE:Unit Type Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ YearsSF 25 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --MF 50 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --MH N/ACN/AGN/ATotals by Yr75 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Grand Total 150.268 6468 6413264641289.A.4.gPacket Pg. 638Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Types of Reviews: School Impact Analysis: This review should be divided into two categories: -School Capacity Review (land use and rezonings), and; -Concurrency Determinations (site plans and subdivisions). School Capacity Review is the review of a project in the land use and rezoning stage of development. It is a review of the impact of the development on school capacity and is considered long range planning. This may be a review resulting in mitigation being required. In situations where the applicant may be required to mitigate, capacity may be reserved dependent on the type of mitigation. Concurrency Determination is the review of residential site plans and subdivisions to determine whether there is available capacity. When capacity is determined to be available a School Capacity Determination Letter (SCADL) will be issued verifying available capacity to the applicant and the local government. If a project exceeds the adopted level of service standards, the applicant is afforded the option of a negotiation period that may or may not result in an executed/recorded mitigation agreement Mitigation at this stage is expressed as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement. For those residential developments that may have an impact but are otherwise exempt from concurrency, an exemption letter will be prepared for the applicant upon request. For those residential developments that are determined to not have an impact, a letter of no impact will be prepared for the applicant upon request. Exemption Letter: An applicant may request an Exemption Letter as documentation for the local government. These are projects that would be exempt from school concurrency review or projects that do not impact the public schools. Exemptions from school concurrency are limited to existing single family or mobile home lots of record; amendments to previously approved site plans or plats that do not increase the number of dwelling units or change the dwelling unit type; age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18; or residential site plans or plats or amendments to site plans or plats that generate less than one student; or are authorized as a Development of Regional Impact (Chapter 380, F.S.) as of July 1, 2005. Concurrency Determination Amendment: An applicant may request an amendment to a previously issued School Concurrency Determination or to an application being processed. This review may require additional staff time beyond the initial concurrency determination review and results in a modified determination being issued. An amendment could result in a negotiation period and/or a mitigation agreement being issued or a previously approved determination being modified and reissued. 3 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com September 24th, 2019 Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division Gil Martinez Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Department RE: Response to 1st Round Comments Planned Unit Development Rezone PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Multi-Family Residential Development (PUDZ) Dear Mr. Gil Martinez: The following is our response to staffs 1st review comments for above referenced project: Comprehensive Planning Review Reviewed By: David Weeks on behalf of Corby Schmidt Email: david.weeks@colliercountyfl.gov Phone #: (239) 252-2387 &/or Email: corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov Phone #: (239) 252-2944 Correction Comment 1: This petition cannot be found consistent without a companion Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement - which provides the necessary details and commitments to demonstrate the project qualifies for the requested density. Petitioner should contact Mr. Cormac Giblin, Manager, in the Collier County Community and Human Services Division (cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov or (239-252-2399). Note: The pre-application meeting notes from Comprehensive Planning Section included a suggestion to contact Cormac. Response: Cormac Giblin has been contacted and the Affordable Housing Density Agreement is being prepared and will be forthcoming. Correction Comment 2: There are numerous modifications needed to the PUD exhibits for proper content. Response: The appropriate modifications have been made and the revised PUD exhibits are included in this submittal. Environmental Review Reviewed By: Erin Josephitis Email: Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov Phone #: (239) 252-2915 Correction Comment 1: Replace “Preserve Area” with “Preserve” on the Master Plan (LDC 3.05.07 H.1.). Response: The Master Plan has been revised to say “Preserve”. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com Correction Comment 2: Explain how the project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP in the evaluation criteria and environmental data report. Response: This Project is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP), and the goals and objectives of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). GOAL 6: To Identify, Protect, Conserve and Appropriately Use Native Vegetative Communities and Wildlife Habitat. OBJECTIVE 6.1: Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Project Consistency with CCME Objective 6.1: In accordance with site preservation and native vegetation retention requirements established in CCME Policy 6.1.1 and LDC 3.05.07 B.1, 15% of the site (1.41 ac.) will be preserved. The preserve area and calculations are shown on the Master Plan. See Preserve Management Plan for reference. GOAL 7: To Protect and Conserve the County’s Fisheries and Wildlife. OBJECTIVE 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. Project Consistency with CCME Objective 7.1: The subject property is bordered by two conservation areas to the north and northwest. The conservation areas include a 3-acre preserve associated with Habitat for Humanity’s Faith Landing development, and a 13-acre Collier County preserve. The listed species surveys identified scrub-jays in the Faith Landing conservation area and along the northern property line. The location and management plan for the 1.41-acre on-site preserve will avoid significant modifications to the occupied scrub-jay habitat to the north, and provides a compatible buffer to the offsite conservation areas. See Preserve Management Plan for reference. (Response by Church Environmental) Correction Comment 3: Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC in the evaluation criteria and environmental data report. Response: In accordance with site preservation and native vegetation retention requirements established in CCME Policy 6.1.1 and LDC 3.05.07 B.1, 15% of the site (1.41 ac.) will be preserved. The preserve area and calculations are shown on the Master Plan. See Preserve Management Plan for reference. (Response by Church Environmental) Correction Comment 4: Provide the clearing permit number if the property was legally cleared. Response: No clearing permit has been found for the site. Correction Comment 5: If the site was illegally cleared, then revise the preserve calculations to include the native vegetation prior to clearing. Response: The preserve calculations have been revised to include the native vegetation prior to clearing. Correction Comment 6: If the site was legally cleared, provide a native tree count and retained trees calculations table per LDC 3.05.07.A.2. Response: No clearing permit has been found for the site. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com Correction Comment 7: Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained and acreage of native vegetation provided on-site in the environmental data, evaluation criteria, PUD document and PUD Master Plan. Response: The calculation for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained and acreage of vegetation provided has been added to the necessary documents and Master Plan. Correction Comment 8: Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): Include an aerial exhibit of transects walked in the environmental data report. Response: Please see Attachment 1 in the Listed Species Survey Report for the survey transect exhibit. (Response by Church Environmental) Correction Comment 9: Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): Provide a table of listed plant and animal species expected in each habitat type and identify whether they were present or absent in the environmental data report. Response: The following table identifies potential listed species that may occur on the property and observed listed species. Scientific Name Common Name State Status Federal Status Observed Gopherus polyphemus Gopher tortoise Threatened Candidate N Drymarchon corais couperi Eastern indigo snake Federally Threatened Threatened N Aphelocoma coerulescens Florida scrub-jay Federally Threatened Threatened Y Athene cunicularia Burrowing owl Threatened N Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald eagle NL *Other N Puma concolor coryi Florida panther Federally Endangered Endangered N Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker Federally Endangered Endangered N Polyborus plancus audubonii Audubon’s crested caracara Federally Threatened Threatened N Eumops floridanus Florida bonneted bat Federally Endangered Endangered N Cyrtopodium punctatum Cigar orchid Endangered NL N Encyclia cochleata Clamshell orchid Endangered NL N Encyclia tampensis Butterfly orchid NL NL N Pteroglossaspis ecristata Giant orchid Threatened NL N Polyrrhiza lindenii Ghost orchid Endangered NL N Tillandsia utriculata Giant wild-pine Endangered NL N Tillandsia balbisiana Inflated wild-pine Threatened NL N Tillandsia fasciculata Stiffed-leaved wild- pine Endangered NL N Tillandsia flexuosa Twisted air plant Threatened NL N 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com Andropogon arctatus Pine-woods bluestem Threatened NL N Calopogon multiflorus Many-flowered grasspink Threatened NL N Passiflora pallens Pine passionflower Endangered NL N Asclepias curtissii Curtis’s milkweed Endangered NL N *protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Response by Church Environmental) Correction Comment 10: Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): Provide descriptions of each FLUCCS code on the report. Response: The property is undeveloped land, bordered by residential development, Lake Trafford Road to the south, and N 19th Street to the east. Based on a review of Google Earth imagery, the mid-canopy and understory were cleared sometime between May 2007 to November 2008. A small area (0.8 ac.) in the southeast corner of the property (FLUCFCS code 3109), appears to have been utilized as a construction staging area for the recent improvements made to N 19th Street. FLUCFCS 3109 lacks canopy and mid-canopy cover, and the groundcover is comprised mostly of ruderal species. Herbaceous plants observed include Mexican clover (Richardia scabra), prostrate false buttonweed (Spermacoce prostrata), natal grass (Melinis repens), finger grass (Eustachys petraea), crabgrass (Digitaria sp.), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), beauty berry (Callicarpa Americana), and hairy beggars tick (Bidens pilosa). The remaining 8.5 acres of property was mapped as FLUCFCS code 4159 (Pinewoods/Herbaceous, Disturbed). Canopy species observed included slash pine (Pinus elliottii) and cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto). Mid-canopy species included myrtle oak (Quercus myrtifolia) and rusty lyonia (Lyonia ferruginea). Herbaceous species recorded included Mexican clover, prostrate false buttonweed, crabgrass, ragweed, finger grass, hairy beggars tick, beauty berry, natal grass, Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), wire grass (Aristida stricta), gopher apple (Licania michauxii), smut grass (Sporobolus indicus), grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), and Southern gaura (Gaura angustifolia). (Response by Church Environmental) Correction Comment 11: Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): Provide credentials of the individual who prepared the environmental data. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor’s or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Response: Please see resume for Church Roberts. (Response by Church Environmental) Correction Comment 12: Add principle and accessory structure setbacks for the preserve to Exhibit B development standards table. Principle structures must be setback a minimum of 25 feet from the boundary of preserves and accessory structures, a minimum of 10 feet from the boundary of preserves. Response: The required preserve setbacks have been added to the Master Plan. Correction Comment 13: If the PUD includes a Preserve Tract section, please include the following under Exhibit A Permitted Uses: PRESERVE A. Principal Use: Preserve 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com B. Accessory Uses: Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves Response: This addition has been made to Exhibit A. Correction Comment 14: PUD Document shall identify any listed species (Scrub Jays) found on site and describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for Scrub Jays. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. Response: Please see Preserve Management Plan. (Response by Church Environmental) Correction Comment 15: Replace the Exhibit F environmental commitment stating “Please see Listed or Endangered Species Report, prepared by Church Environmental, detailing all species on site” with the specific required/provided native vegetation preservation calculations and Scrub Jay protection language that will be addressed at time of SDP or PPL. Response: The specific required/provided native vegetation preservation calculations and Scrub Jay protection language has been added to Exhibit F. Correction Comment 16: Omit the “preserve details, existing trees, and tree total” sections from the Master Plan. Replace with required/provided native vegetation preservation calculations. Response: The preserve details, existing trees, and total trees have been replaced with the required/provided native vegetation preservation calculations on the Master Plan. Correction Comment 17: Omit the 20’ preserve buffer from the Master Plan. Response: The 20’ preserve buffer has been omitted from the Master Plan. Historical Review Reviewed By: Ray Bellows Email: ray.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov Phone #: (239) 252-2463 Correction Comment 1: Please submit an Archaeological Cultural Assessment or a waiver from this requirement pursuant to Sections 2.03.07.E2.c & j. of the LDC. Response: A request form for a waiver of the Archaeological Cultural Assessment is included in this submittal. Transportation Pathways Review Reviewed By: Michael Sawyer Email: michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Phone #: (239) 252-2926 Correction Comment 1: Additional Comments- Transportation Pathways Review: Rev.1: Along the west side North 19th Street please show on the master plan the required 5' sidewalk with 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com the existing ROW. Please also show sidewalk connections at the Lake Trafford Road access to the existing sidewalk. Response: The required sidewalks have been added to the Master Plan. Transportation Planning Review Reviewed By: Michael Sawyer Email: michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Phone #: (239) 252-2926 Correction Comment 1: Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev.1: Reference Exhibit A of the PUD Document, A.1.c. Under Principal Uses please indicate what if any limitations are proposed for this Community Center Principal Use and reflect in the TIS. The TIs must be revised to include Community Center as a principal use including associated trip generation. Please also revise the Master Plan to show a Community Center alternative development for the site. Response: Per Comprehensive Planning Review comments, the community center has been revised to be considered an accessory use, as it will be used by community residents. Correction Comment 2: Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev.1: Reference Exhibit A of the PUD Document, A.1.b. Please include traffic calculations for townhome use in the TIS. Please also revise the Master Plan to show a Townhome alternative development for the site. Response: Townhomes have been omitted from permitted use list. Correction Comment 3: Developer commitments made as a condition of zoning are not adequately addressed Rev.1: Rev.1: Reference Exhibit F of the PUD Document, Developer Commitments, 2. Transportation. Please revise A-H. All of these commitments are duplication of minimum standards. Response: Exhibit F of the PUD Document, Developer Commitments, 2. Transportation has been revised by adding a strike-though change, because they are simply duplications of minimum standards. Correction Comment 4: Developer commitments made as a condition of zoning are not adequately addressed Rev.1: Rev.1: Reference Exhibit F of the PUD Document, Developer Commitments, 2. Transportation. Please add a developer commitment for Trip Limit consistent with standard language and your revised TIS. ” The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed ____ two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval.” Response: The above developer commitment regarding Trip Limit for the PUD has been added to the Developer Commitments, 2. Transportation section. Correction Comment 5: Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com Rev.1: Traffic impact methodology notes are not included. Please provide documentation to verify the County agreement with using the 0.5 factor in reduction/adjustment of the number of dwelling units for analysis. Response: Traffic methodology notes have been included in this submittal with the county’s agreement with using the 0.5 factor in reduction/adjustment of the number of dwelling units for analysis. Correction Comment 6: Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev.1: Table 5: The method using the vested trips in the AUIR to compute year 2021 build-out traffic was omitted. This method will yield higher numbers thane the annual growth rate method thus increasing the v/c ratio. For instance: The 2021 build-out with project traffic will be 575 and 740 instead of 555 and 683 respectively. Response: The 2021 build-out traffic numbers have been revised to include using the annual or actual growth rate, whichever is higher. Build-out traffic and v/c have been updated accordingly. Zoning Review Reviewed By: Gil Martinez Email: Gilbert.Martinez@colliercountyfl.gov Phone #: (239) 252-4211 Correction Comment 1: Please provide a description or narrative of project development, including a description of the relationship of the proposed land uses to each other within the PUD and to land uses abutting/surrounding the project. The dynamic service it will provide and how it will integrate and serve the community. Response: A description of the project development including the pertinent information listed is included with this submittal. County Attorney Review Reviewed By: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Email: heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Phone #: (239) 252-8773 Correction Comment 1: Miscellaneous Corrections: County Attorney review will commence with Submittal 2. If all County staff approve Submittal 1, the County Attorney's office will be notified and submittal 1 will be reviewed. Response: Acknowledged. Landscape Review Reviewed By: Mark Templeton Email: Mark.Templeton@colliercountyfl.gov Phone #: (239) 252-2475 Correction Comment 1: Please label the buffer types and widths on the Master Plan. 10' Type 'D' along the South and East. 15' Type 'B' along the West and North. Show the buffer easements along the North and West stopping at the preserve. Response: Labels for buffer types and widths have been added to the Master Plan. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com Correction Comment 2: Please add the following note to the Master Plan: "Preserve may be used to satisfy the buffer requirements after removal of exotics and supplemental planting in accordance with 3.05.07. In order to ensure that the requirements of a Type 'B' buffer are met, a 6' wide buffer reservation has been provided on the master plan. In the event that the preserve does not meet buffer requirements after removal of exotics and supplemental planting, plantings will be provided in the 6' wide reservation to meet the buffer requirements. The type, size and number of such plantings, if necessary, will be determined at time of initial SDP and included on the landscape plans for the SDP." If there will be a HOA or COA, please indicate that the owner will convey the reservation to the HOA or COA at time of SDP or plat approval. Response: The above note regarding the preserve has been added to the Master Plan. This will not be an HOA or COA. Correction Comment 3: Since a Type 'B' buffer is required along the North and West, please show a 6' wide buffer reservation along the outside of the preserve for buffer plantings if necessary. Response: The Master Plan has been revised to show a 6’ wide buffer reservation. Correction Comment 4: Please phrase the deviation requests in the proper format. "seeking a deviation from (state section of the LDC) which requires (state language in that section of the LDC) to instead allow....... Response: The deviation request has been revised to have the proper format. Correction Comment 5: Rather than requesting quantity of foundation and VUA (vehicular use area) landscape to be reduced by 50%, staff recommends requesting to allow a reduction in size of trees. Internal landscape are must be provided in the amount of 10% of the vehicular use area. This can be sod only. In addition, there is a tree requirement for VUA landscape area. Trees are required to be minimum 10' tall with a 4' spread, and 1-3/4" caliper. Foundation planting requires shrubs and groundcovers and a certain number of trees. There is no minimum size requirement for the shrubs and groundcovers but the same minimum size requirement for foundation planting trees as VUA trees. Staff recommends requesting a deviation to allow for smaller VUA and foundation trees. The size requirement is in 4.06.05.D if the LDC. Response: The deviation request has been revised to seek a deviation from 4.06.05D of the LDC which requires trees to be a minimum of 25 gallon, 10' tall with a 4' spread, and 1-3/4" caliper to allow for smaller VUA and foundation trees. Correction Comment 6: Please submit a cover letter/narrative statement. Response: A cover letter/narrative statement has been included with this submittal. The following comments are informational and/or may include stipulations: GENERAL COMMENTS: [Gil Martinez] 1. Additional comments or stipulations may be forthcoming once a sufficient application has been submitted for review. This correspondence should not be construed as a position of support or non- support for any issues within the petition. Staff will analyze the petition and the recommendation will be contained in the staff report prepared for the Collier County Planning Commission. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com Response: Acknowledged. 2. Please be advised that pursuant to the LDC, an application can be considered closed if there has been no activity on the application for a period of six (6) months. That six months period will be calculated from the date of this letter. Response: Acknowledged. 3. Please ensure that all members of your review team that may testify before the CCPC and the BCC are registered as lobbyists with the county pursuant to the regulations regarding that issue. Response: Acknowledged. 4. When addressing review comments, please provide a cover letter outlining your response to each comment. Include a response to all comments. Response: Acknowledged. Cover letter provided. 5. Please put revised dates on all exhibits and in the title block of the Site Plan. The PUD document should include a footer that reflects the project name, petition number, date and page X of Y for the entire document. Documents without this information will be rejected. Response: Revised dates on al exhibits and in the title block of the Site Plan have been added. The PUD has been revised to include the proper footer. 6. A partial resubmittal cannot be accepted; please do not resubmit until you can respond to ALL review comments. Response: Acknowledged. 7. Note the adopted fee schedule requires payment of additional fees for petitions that require more than four re-submittals; please contact the appropriate staff and resolve issues to avoid this fee. Response: Acknowledged. Please contact our office if you have any questions, or Church Environmental with questions pertaining to responses that were addressed by Church Environmental. Church Environmental contact information: Church Roberts croberts@churchenvironmental.com (239)-888-6997 Sincerely, Andres Boral, PE, MBA Florida License Number: 80373 Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. andres@boralengineering.com 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com November 21st, 2019 Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division Tim Finn Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Department RE: Response to 2nd Round Comments Planned Unit Development Rezone PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Multi-Family Residential Development (PUDZ) Dear Mr. Tim Finn: The following is our response to staffs 2nd review comments for above referenced project: Environmental Review Reviewed By: Erin Josephitis 1. 8/6/19: Explain how the project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP in the evaluation criteria and environmental data report. 10/28/19: Add the narrative from the response letter dated 9/24/19 to the evaluation criteria and environmental data report. Revise the narrative calculations to clarify that 15 percent (1.41 acres) of the total site will be preserved. The locations where Scrub Jays were observed shall be consistent with the listed species survey. Omit the preserve management plan for reference as this document will not be reviewed until the time of first development order (SDP or PPL). Response: Please see the Listed Species Survey Report with the information from the narrative in the response letter added to the report. The narrative calculations have been revised to clarify calculations. A separate Environmental Evaluation Criteria document from the overall RPUD Rezone Evaluation Criteria is not required per post comment meeting with county staff. The preserve management plan has been omitted (Church Environmental). 2. 8/6/19: Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained and acreage of native vegetation provided on-site in the environmental data, evaluation criteria, PUD document and PUD Master Plan. 10/28/19: Add the preserve calculations to the evaluation criteria and listed species survey. Response: Please see the Listed Species Survey Report with the added preserve calculations. A separate Environmental Evaluation Criteria document from the overall RPUD Rezone Evaluation Criteria is not required per post comment meeting with county staff (Church Environmental). 3. 8/6/19: PUD Document shall identify any listed species (Scrub Jays) found on site and describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for Scrub Jays. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com the project. 10/28/19: Revise Exhibit F 3.B to include language from the example provided above. Response: Please see that the PUD Document has been revised to include the above language. 4. 10/28/19: There is a discrepancy between the square feet of preserve on PUD Exhibits C-1 and C-2. Retain the label for 1.41 acres of preserve and omit the square feet from the exhibits. Response: Please see that the PUD Exhibit C-2 has been omitted. The preserve has been revised to only show acreage. 5. 10/28/19: Use acres instead of square feet for the preserve calculations on PUD Exhibit C-1. Response: Preserve calculations on PUD Exhibit C have been revised to only show acreage. 6. 10/28/19: There is a discrepancy between the Scrub Jay observations described in the response letter (correction 2), and locations shown on the Listed Species Survey (Figure 3-2 and Attachment 1). Please revise for consistency. Response: Please see that the discrepancy between the Scrub Jay observation described in the response letter (correction 2) and location shown on the Listed Species Survey Report (Fig. 3-2 and Attachment 1) has been addressed (Church Environmental). 7. 10/28/19: The listed species survey indicates the development is on a 9.3 acre parcel, however the entire site is 9.52 acres. Please clarify the entire site was surveyed and revise for consistency. Response: Please see that the Listed Species Survey Report has been revised to show the correct acreage, 9.52 acres (Church Environmental). 8. 10/28/19: Remove the solid waste enclosure concrete pad and structural buffer from inside of the preserve. Response: Please see that the solid waste enclosure concrete pad has been relocated on the Master Plan. Historical Review Reviewed By: Ray Bellows 1. Please submit an Archaeological Cultural Assessment or a waiver from this requirement pursuant to Sections 2.03.07.E2.c & j. of the LDC. Response: Please see the approved Waiver from Archaeological Cultural Assessment that is included in our submittal. Zoning Review Reviewed By: Timothy Finn 1. In the Application, Under Applicant Contact Information, please list Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP as the name of the property owner. Additionally, please list Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. as the contract purchaser. Please include their contact information and addressees for both these entities. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com Response: Comment was removed at post-review comment meeting. 2. On a separate sheet, submit a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.13(B)(1): a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, policies, and the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Response: Please see the Evaluation Criteria document that has been included with our submittal. 3. Submit a boundary survey (no more than 6 months old) and legal description Response: Please see the boundary survey and legal description that has been included with our submittal. 4. Submit a narrative describing the proposed timing for location of, and sequence of phasing, or incremental development within the PUD Response: Please see that a narrative of the proposed timing and phasing information has been added to the Cover Letter. 5. Submit a plan on the location and nature of all existing public facilities, such as schools, parks and fire stations that will service the PUD Response: Comment was removed at post-review comment meeting. 6. Submit a plan for the provision of all needed utilities to serve the PUD; including (as appropriate) water supply, sanitary sewer collection and treatment system, stormwater collection and management system, pursuant to county regulations and ordinances. Response: Comment was removed at post-review comment meeting. 7. The waiver from the requirement to submit a Cultural Assessment for this petition will be heard at the November 15, 2019 Historic/ Archaeological Preservation Board (HAPB) meeting. Staff will provide additional information (map with overlay, aerials, pictures, etc.) for the Board to make a decision. After this meeting, staff will correspond with agent on the Boards decision of this waiver. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com Response: Acknowledged. 8. Submit another Affidavit of Authorization form that gives consent from the property owner, Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP to the contract purchaser, Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. Please include the Petition # PL20190000734 is included on this form. Response: Please see that another Affidavit of Authorization form that gives consent from the property owner, Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP to the contract purchaser, Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. is included with our submittal. 9. On the Affidavit of Authorization that gives consent from the contract purchaser, Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc to the agent, Andres Boral, P.E. Boral Engineering & Design Inc., please include the Petition # PL20190000734 on this form. Response: Please see the revised Affidavit of Authorization with the petition number included. 10. In the PUD Document, Exhibit E, please reformat the deviations. Please use Ordinance 2018-40 "951 Villas RPUD" PUD Document, Exhibit E as a guide to reformat these deviations, sent by planner in email. Response: Please see the revised PUD Document, Exhibit E, which has been reformatted. 11. On a separate sheet, provide a deviations justification narrative that lists the deviations and the justifications. Please provide detail for your justifications. Please use the “Deviation Justification Narrative-951 Villas RPUD" as a guide, sent by planner in email. In regard to Deviations 1, 2, and 3, per LDC 2.03.07(G)(7), Immokalee Urban Overlay District, Interim Deviations, please explain and justify whether these are substantial or insubstantial deviations per the following below: Interim Deviations: Property owners within the Immokalee Urban Overlay District may request deviations from specific dimensional requirements as described in this section. A deviation request may be reviewed administratively or by the Planning Commission depending upon its scope. This section addresses the permissible deviations, limitations thereon, and the review process. a. Review Process. Insubstantial deviations will be reviewed administratively by the County Manager or designee. Substantial deviations will be reviewed by the Planning Commission. This section is not intended to replace the current established process of requesting deviations through the PUD rezoning process. Any deviations from the LDC which are not expressly provided for in this section shall be processed as variances in accordance with Section 9.04.00 of the LDC. b. Concurrent Deviation Application required. All deviation requests shall be made concurrently with an application for an SDP or amendment, SIP or amendment or Final Subdivision Plat, or in the case of sign deviations, with a building permit. The applicant shall list all requested deviations on the required site plan(s) and shall depict the deviation(s) graphically on the plan(s). Additional graphic information may also be required by staff, on a case-by case basis. c. Insubstantial Deviations. Requested deviations that do not exceed 10 percent of the required dimension, amount, size, or other applicable dimensional standard, with the exception of the required number of parking spaces, which may not exceed 20 percent of the LDC requirement (not more than 10 spaces), are insubstantial. To be approved, the following criteria must be considered: i. The proposed deviation is compatible with adjacent land uses and structures, achieves the requirements of the regulations as closely as is practicable, and meets the intent of the related Land Development Code regulations; and ii. The applicant proposes equitable tradeoffs for the proposed diminution in development standards, such as increased open space, landscaping, pedestrian spaces, buffering or architectural 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com features, in order to meet the intent of the regulation being diminished. d. Substantial Deviations. Requested deviations that do not qualify as insubstantial deviations are substantial deviations: i. Considerations for Review and Approval: The CCPC shall consider the following: a) Whether or not the proposed deviation is compatible with adjacent land uses and achieves the requirements and/or intent of the regulations as closely as is practicable; and b) Whether the proposed deviation is the minimum amount necessary to allow for reasonable use of the property and/or address the issue necessitating the deviation request; and c) Whether the reduced or increased standard requested by the deviation is mitigated for, either on the subject site or by providing a public benefit on the subject site. Examples of such on-site mitigation include but are not limited to: increasing setbacks from the adjacent road right-of-way when proposing to deviate from sign size limitations; increasing plantings or planting sizes or installing a fence or wall where a reduced buffer width is proposed; providing public pedestrian and/or bicycle pathway easements or other similar mobility improvements including transit enhancements; providing public parking; providing beautification in the public realm, including street trees, street furniture, lighting and other similar public benefits. Moreover, please illustrate the location of each deviation on the Master site plan by its corresponding number. Response: Please see the Deviation Justification document which has been revised to the formatting requested by the county and in sample document. 12. Refer to "Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance redlines as of 10-28-19" document sent by planner. Response: Please see the revised PUD Document where redlines have been addressed. 13. In the Agreement Authorizing Affordable Housing Density Bonus and Imposing Covenants and Restrictions on Real Property, page 6 of 26. Please change 95 units/ac to 14 units/ac. Response: Please see the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement, which has been revised. 14. Refer to and make changes per "Immokalee Fair Housing AHDB Markups 102519-1452" document sent by planner. Response: Please see the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement, which has been revised. County Attorney Review Reviewed By: Heidi Ashton-Cicko 1. Please address the comments and changes per my 10-28-19 review of the PUD document, to be provided by email by County staff. Response: Please see the revised PUD Document where redlines have been addressed. 2. Please provide a survey or proof of acreage. The application lists the property as 9.52 acres. The property appraiser estimates 9.27 acres. Response: Please see the boundary survey and legal description that has been included with our submittal. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com 3. Please remove the landscape plan as an exhibit to the Ordinance unless staff is requiring the plan. If you are providing an enhanced buffer, then provide the details of the enhanced buffer. Response: Please see that the Landscape Plan has been removed from the exhibit section. No enhance buffers are provided. 4. Please process the housing agreement through Cormac Giblin in Housing. The agreement will be a companion item for the CCPC and BCC. Response: The Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement has been processed with Cormac Giblin. Landscape Review Reviewed By: Mark Templeton 1. Please label the buffer types and widths on the Master Plan. 10' Type 'D' along the South and East. 15' Type 'B' along the West and North. Show the buffer easements along the North and West stopping at the preserve. Rev. 2: There is no requirement for a 25' wide Type 'D' buffer that is shown encroaching into the drive aisle along the north. Please remove this. Response: Please see that the incorrect buffer label has been removed. 2. Please add the following note to the Master Plan: "Preserve may be used to satisfy the buffer requirements after removal of exotics and supplemental planting in accordance with 3.05.07. In order to ensure that the requirements of a Type 'B' buffer are met, a 6' wide buffer reservation has been provided on the master plan. In the event that the preserve does not meet buffer requirements after removal of exotics and supplemental planting, plantings will be provided in the 6' wide reservation to meet the buffer requirements. The type, size and number of such plantings, if necessary, will be determined at time of initial SDP and included on the landscape plans for the SDP." If there will be a HOA or COA, please indicate that the owner will convey the reservation to the HOA or COA at time of SDP or plat approval. Rev. 2: There is a typo in the last sentence of the note. "For" is spelled Fot Response: Please see that the spelling error has been corrected. 3. Rev. 2: Staff cannot support a deviation to reduce the height of trees to half the minimum requirement. 5' is the minimum height required for shrubs in Type 'B' buffers. Staff suggests revising the deviation to allow for minimum 8' high trees. It would also be worth reviewing LDC section 2.03.07.G.7.c which allows for administratively approved insubstantial deviations which would not be required to be requested as part of this PUDZ. 2.03.07.G.7.e.xv allows these deviations to apply to VUA landscape requirements and foundation planting requirements. Although the deviation only allows for 10% reduction, it is a reduction not only in size of plantings, but also quantity, which applied to foundation planting may help reduce landscape costs enough to eliminate the need for this deviation to be included in a public hearing. Response: Please see the revised PUD Document, Deviations section, where deviations from landscaping requirements has been removed from the RPUD. 5. Rev. 2: The detailed landscape plan will be reviewed at time of SDP and is not required as part of this PUDZ application. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com Response: Please see that the Landscape Plan has been removed from the exhibit section. 6. Rev. 2: 4.06.03.B.1 states that VUA landscape areas not dedicated to trees or preservation or existing vegetation shall be landscaped with grass amongst other plantings. LDC 4.06.05.D.7 states that grassed lawn areas can be seeded. It doesn't appear that deviation 3 is needed. Please note that 4.06.05.D.7 also requires that slopes steeper than 6:1 be sodded. So if there will be any areas with this condition such as the detention area, you would need a deviation if you didn't want to use sod. Staff cannot guarantee support for this deviation however. Response: Please see the revised PUD Document, Deviations section, where deviations from landscaping requirements has been removed from the RPUD. GENERAL COMMENTS: [Timothy Finn] 1. Additional comments or stipulations may be forthcoming once a sufficient application has been submitted for review. This correspondence should not be construed as a position of support or non-support for any issues within the petition. Staff will analyze the petition and the recommendation will be contained in the staff report prepared for the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) or Hearing Examiner (Hex). Response: Acknowledged. 2. Please be advised that pursuant to the LDC, an application can be considered closed if there has been no activity on the application for a period of six (6) months. That six months period will be calculated from the date of this letter. Response: Acknowledged. 3. Please ensure that all members of your review team that may testify before the Hex/CCPC and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) are registered as lobbyists with the county pursuant to the regulations regarding that issue. Response: Acknowledged. 4. When addressing review comments, please provide a cover letter outlining your response to each comment. Include a response to all comments. Response: Acknowledged. 5. Please put revised dates on all exhibits and in the title block of the Site Plan. The PUD document should include a footer that reflects the project name, petition number, date and page X of Y for the entire document. Documents without this information will be rejected. Response: Acknowledged. 6. A partial resubmittal cannot be accepted; please do not resubmit until you can respond to ALL review comments. Response: Acknowledged. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com 7. Public hearings cannot be held until the Neighborhood Information criteria has been met. In some petition types a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) must be held while other petition types only require the agent to send a letter. All letters and ads must be pre-approved by the county planner. For additional information about the process please contact me. Please note that the NIM must be held at least 15 days prior to the first hearing. As you prepare for that meeting, please be aware of the following items: a) Please provide the required affidavit and its attachments prior to the meeting (in compliance with the LDC); and b) Please post signs to direct attendees to the exact meeting location; and c) Please ensure that there is sound amplification equipment available and working for this meeting. If there is no permanent equipment, please bring a tested/working portable microphone; and d) You must provide a written synopsis of the meeting that includes a list of all questions and answers as well as providing the audio/video tape; and e) Please prepare documents for hand out to all NIM attendees and the public hearing file, that show the differences in the uses that would be allowed in the existing and proposed zoning districts. This request is based upon recent CCPC direction. Response: Acknowledged. 8. Note the adopted fee schedule requires payment of additional fees for petitions that require more than four resubmittals; please contact the appropriate staff and resolve issues to avoid this fee. Response: Acknowledged. Please contact our office if you have any questions, or Church Environmental with questions pertaining to responses that were addressed by Church Environmental. Church Environmental contact information: Church Roberts croberts@churchenvironmental.com (239)-888-6997 Sincerely, Andres Boral, PE, MBA Florida License Number: 80373 Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. andres@boralengineering.com 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com January 9th, 2020 Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division Timothy Finn Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Department RE: Response to 3rd Round Comments Planned Unit Development Rezone PL20190000734 Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Multi-Family Residential Development (PUDZ) Dear Mr. Timothy Finn: The following is our response to staffs 3rd review comments for above referenced project: Environmental Review Reviewed By: Erin Josephitis 1. 8/6/2019: Explain how the project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP in the evaluation criteria and environmental data report. 10/28/2019: Add the narrative from the response letter dated 9/24/19 to the evaluation criteria and environmental data report. Revise the narrative calculations to clarify that 15 percent (1.41 acres) of the total site will be preserved. The locations where Scrub Jays were observed shall be consistent with the listed species survey. Omit the preserve management plan for reference as this document will not be reviewed until the time of first development order (SDP or PPL). 1/3/2020: Add the narrative from the response letter dated 9/24/19 to the evaluation criteria. Response: Please see the revised evaluation criteria, which includes the narrative from the response letter dated 9/24/19. 2. 8/6/2019: Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained and acreage of native vegetation provided on-site in the environmental data, evaluation criteria, PUD document and PUD Master Plan. 10/28/2019: Add the preserve calculations to the evaluation criteria and listed species survey. 1/3/2020: Add preserve calculations to the evaluation criteria. Response: Please see the revised evaluation criteria, which includes the preserve calculations. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com Zoning Review Reviewed By: Timothy Finn 1. In regard to the “Agreement Authorizing Affordable Housing and Density Bonus and Imposing Covenants and Restrictions on Real Property” report, please adhere to the following revisions: - Page #1 (and throughout) – Update all dates to 2020 - Page #2, 2. Change the 128, to 90 affordable units. Response: Please see the revised Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement, with the above revisions included. Landscaping Review Reviewed By: Mark Templeton 1. Please remove the last sentence in footnote 1 under Exhibit B. Encroachment of LBE's into PUE's and CUE's is acceptable. If the overlap is not 100% and the buffer plantings can be kept out of the PUE or CUE there is no issue. If plantings are forced to be within the CUE or PUE, a letter of agreement is required from the utility companies or the design will need to be revised to allow for plantings to be outside of the PUE or CUE. But partial encroachment of LBE's into other easements is fairly common. The last sentence of the footnote indicates that there can be no overlap of those easements which may restrict site layout. Response: Please see the revised PUD Document, footnote 1 under Exhibit B, where the last sentence has been deleted. General Comments By: Timothy Finn 1. Additional comments or stipulations may be forthcoming once a sufficient application has been submitted for review. This correspondence should not be construed as a position of support or non- support for any issues within the petition. Staff will analyze the petition and the recommendation will be contained in the staff report prepared for the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) or Hearing Examiner (Hex). Response: Acknowledged. 2. Please be advised that pursuant to the LDC, an application can be considered closed if there has been no activity on the application for a period of six (6) months. That six months period will be calculated from the date of this letter. Response: Acknowledged. 3. Please ensure that all members of your review team that may testify before the Hex/CCPC and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) are registered as lobbyists with the county pursuant to the regulations regarding that issue. Response: Acknowledged. 4. When addressing review comments, please provide a cover letter outlining your response to each 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-0509  www.boralengineering.com comment. Include a response to all comments. Response: Acknowledged. 5. Please put revised dates on all exhibits and in the title block of the Site Plan. The PUD document should include a footer that reflects the project name, petition number, date and page X of Y for the entire document. Documents without this information will be rejected. Response: Acknowledged. 6. A partial resubmittal cannot be accepted; please do not resubmit until you can respond to ALL review comments. Response: Acknowledged. 7. As discussed per a phone meeting with staff on December 9, 2019, due to the first NIM advertising not having enough time (advertised 9 days before the NIM hearing date when there should have been 15 days between the advertisement date and the NIM meeting) a second NIM meeting will be required. As such, please schedule the second NIM per the following: Public hearings cannot be held until the Neighborhood Information criteria has been met. In some petition types a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) must be held while other petition types only require the agent to send a letter. All letters and ads must be pre-approved by the county planner. For additional information about the process please contact me. Please note that the NIM must be held at least 15 days prior to the first hearing. As you prepare for that meeting, please be aware of the following items: a) Please provide the required affidavit and its attachments prior to the meeting (in compliance with the LDC); and b) Please post signs to direct attendees to the exact meeting location; and c) Please ensure that there is sound amplification equipment available and working for this meeting. If there is no permanent equipment, please bring a tested/working portable microphone; and d) You must provide a written synopsis of the meeting that includes a list of all questions and answers as well as providing the audio/video tape; and e) Please prepare documents for hand out to all NIM attendees and the public hearing file, that show the differences in the uses that would be allowed in the existing and proposed zoning districts. This request is based upon recent CCPC direction. Response: Acknowledged. 8. Note the adopted fee schedule requires payment of additional fees for petitions that require more than four resubmittals; please contact the appropriate staff and resolve issues to avoid this fee. Response: Acknowledged. Please contact our office if you have any questions. Sincerely, Andres Boral, PE, MBA Florida License Number: 80373 Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. andres@boralengineering.com 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) d Fl () Dec. 20th, 2019 Re: Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Multi-Family Residential Development (PL20190000734) Enclosed please find the following documents in accordance with Collier County’s Neighborhood Information Meeting requirements: One (1) original executed Affidavit of Compliance (signed by Andres Boral); One (1) copy of the Neighborhood Information Meeting Notice advertisement which ran in the Naples Daily News on December 10th, 2019; One (1) copy of Neighborhood Information Meeting Notification Letter sent to Property Owners on December 7th, 2019; One (1) copy of Property Owners list. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you, Boral Engineering, Inc. Andres Boral, P.E. Principal Engineer Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 先賢】随勘鯛甘露四・CO斑P轟競闘寄亜 I h朝r車y鉄塊i母咄即rsunt to Ordinan既200441, Of也患Co亜er Co関西Land D鋼玉op皿e虹 Code, I龍d脚躯e血合軸a粗ed捌翻坪型昌でa軸編曲餌亡to a靖錆r and I did gi鴨notice by mal to也e脚垂g坪や孜申0Ⅳ放鋸腕組勝0聾G出血櫨1観皿d蜜料i雷網轟肥融読皿鍋放心諌言蓋蒜蓋言霊鑑三蓋 Me親心奮　励r嬢邸離吸轍i♂触手韓轟糊蛾　露料磁捌膨鍍湖ぼ幽脚色瑠新砂0爛劫a〃お産徽繊極め綜e健膵臓閉ま嫁鰯穣庖諦観珊鶴一郎C壷醗醗C壷脇砂鰯d徽砂峨磁離p郷の翻脚街路滅沙羅敬膨欄綴夜飯掬摺轄母斑一磁搬夢幻鑓搬解毒虎　丁h隼s壷d n加工街 ○○出血鯵d也き両皿徴n’s起怒鋤や宙皿of也晦出合p購蜜e言切ノOf呼で堰㊦容顔血租ge独d也e date, t王血合, and Place of'a既疫的鮮度100d血fomati餌M鰐血g. P富r也e舶租ぬed工単軸銃も押印儲鵬㌢ 0駒鵬で’s工i典、紺追鰹隅のf皿瞬呼野錐濃や錆色鋤曲譜虹料脆血a群督励e ㊦f照軸 Co皿や⑦f Ce址穣 T出癖瓶拶O五重瑠Å範あせ缶のf 瓦α爪庄戸, 出湘tOme Or料ho (範謡離職e癌輯軸) の輯b劇も脂勝地盈頓。f (登壇憾観駈竜OfN如拙y醐ic) 蛎lとに制の仇の健」 P壷艇d N測隠e ㊥f珊勉町融重O主si p劇栂0血岬主d鎖鰯臆c甜壬o搬. 倒軸妙法妙乙 R9巨 0「Ida 040 「eS 3 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 三二二∴ :∴∴:三〇 Pubiished DaiIy Naples, FL 34110 BORAL ENGiNEERING & DES看GN, lN 9911 CORKSCREW RD S丁E 222 ESTERO, Fし33928-3331 A冊davit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN￣COUNTY OF BROWN Befo「e the unde「signed they serve as the authority’ pe「sona-1y appea「ed said -egal cie「k who on oath says that he/she serves as Legal Cierk of the Napies DaiIy News・ a datry newspaper PubIished at Naples言n Co冊e「 County, Fio「ida; dist「ibuted in Co=ie「 and Lee counties of Fio「ida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed・ Afflant fu輔e「 SayS that the said NapIes Datry News is a newspape「 PubIished at Nap-es, ln Sa-d Co旧e「 County’FIorida, and that the said newspape「 has heretofo「e been continuousiy published in Said Collie「 County, F-orida; dist「ibuted in Co冊er and Lee counties of FIo「ida, eaCh day and has been e=te「ed as second cIass ma= matter at the post o冊ce i= Napies’In said Co=ie「 County, FIo「ida, for a pe「iod of one yea「 next p「eced'ng the first publicatio= Of the attached copy of adve面sement; and a冊ant furthe「 says that he has =either paid no「 p「omised any person’O「 CO「POration any discount’ rebate, COmmlSSion or refund for the purpose of securlng this advertisement for pubIication in the said newspape「・ Pubiished: December lO, 2019 .￣￣￣「亡を二十一-- subsc「ibed and swom to befo「e on Decembe「 10) 2019‥ ∴ _、弛」葛久_ YYしのへ(・吐⊥∝虹⊃ Notary, State of W上County of B「own Pub“catlOn Cost: $308.OO Ad No: 0003943157 Customer No‘ 1495490 PO# This is not an invoice 韻寧鶉繚撥繚 street and Lake Trafford Road. The Bezone f「om BSF-4to BPUC 議藷誌蒜盤護鵠鵠蒜 1 。∴書籍謹言嵩。 1 。2 富誤認評語普692￣6738 for any addlt10n-♯3943 1 57 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-6738  www.boralengineering.com Dear Neighbor, You are invited to attend a Neighborhood Information Meeting held by Dr. Arol Buntzman, CEO/Chairman of the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc., and Canon Sandora, Project Manager of Boral Engineering & Design, Inc., regarding the proposed Rezoning of a 9.52 acre property located on the north side of Lake Trafford Road, west of the intersection of North 19 th Street and Lake Trafford Road. The Rezone from RSF-4 to RPUD has been proposed in order to accommodate for a new, decent, safe, hurricane resistant, affordable housing development for farmworker and other low-income families on the property. Thursday, December 19th at 6pm Fellowship Church 1411 Lake Trafford Rd., Immokalee, FL 34142 RSVP is not required. Please call (239)-692-6738 for any additional information regarding the meeting. Thank you, Canon Sandora, E.I. Project Manager Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 曹膏⑱ 傭囲穐醐宙」賦頓孤榊脂庫街耶醐盤8鑓宮に巨富取離臣 l博鵬のKA腹聴靴　竜食餌曲名・ AYALA, MARY ANN 12且8潤誰　対物醐圃耽l心髄詳し　錐鳳埠2-薫離獅愚説軸心玉妊Z,\J息張、辱忠子同調もY J ′ Pめ屯かXl瞬0 IMMOKALEE, Fし　34143--輸1030 C患e脚的部門押抑圧$の利一醐轍捷; P$駁〕猟望ずの輔M命給鯉詳し　動地檎〇〇〇合羽・馳州側翌, Gヂ虻V食料㊥SC軸濃艶ゆ屯聡朗明日邸陸棚朗0㈱臆己,干し　勤脇之-0 CRE洲S &棚輔陣DEN軽量N丁AしINC 甲OI関X豊与了醐瞭琳親睦.純　≡紳士純一支部′ C成増琵騨倉茂㊨内剛重付鯉沼瓦劇搬淑上陸 l棚轍庵も乱　34王鴨2-之632 }D鋤書聖常軌距戸必譲秘EC船場501 V髄\削うヽNÅ乱どな点し’翻亀的--嶋 DAVENPORT. ROB輔T E & LYNETTE 9064丁惟し関馳A削堪§,批　曳抱的-一指写4 D巨C陶醍離鳩.搬A巴涯躍らU§ ㌣ 2崖心持00叫や魚津亙しg拙G櫨ACRgS差し　33935--○○ 蘭親閲醍蜜’ 09し8/0軌合⑧煽^車軸粥!鱒dし棚胴I9油蝉乙勘」0棚弧鍋的鎗騨$銚§⑪触糊輔的網只軸軸鰐経るXぶ鎚蜂聞く AGu栂A瞭」勝臣. G §偽照鍋飯鯛矧岱軽A爛工8之寄峨AVビ I棚棚㊦輯,F」鍋14m: 8ARRON COしLiER PRTNRSHP LしLP a6⑦0-箆綴じ駄蚤博短悠「王縛鰍竹治盈9勘し鯉吟駐§,帰し二三動地競蘭塑7 、B輔細りD亜,、肌Å農蛤瓦N「O同船」Oうど棚ANU重し巧醐U膿且Z 1810 GRANT AVE l醐㊥船艇臣′配　雪像帥之一社ヨネ G稔G煎恵庭留剛巨劫①和博博Q脳虹E手駒訪日の璃捌秘 i棚棚Q蒋蝕時、町　謡必争--珊敵軌弱敵鞘的Y 鳴㊥樹減軽聞く棚髄離職肘詔弱「靖舶脚酬丁龍も宮嶋“10ユ N冷P蝿も乱34工事2-0 CRE海霧丁E髄SA博胆NDQZA 雌80引惟置場偽り麿蹴蛇庭も配秘離脇」狐他節的盈峨脚俄櫛急患尺的毎①上N I祝融0碇規_嘩,干し　玉4己4之--之63之 )D鋤告的P蛾閏,」涯戸戸赦I髄離職船 ‡鯵召㊥且鵬1開脚、NA申、畦も、札　報粗密0-「O DAVENPORT, ROBERT E &‘しYNETTE 9064丁HEし剛隅観官争乱　誰1鉱山-重繁的戦Cの税源. 」均か博押竹とAG棚減S 陣公印思し」Å患U NAS.巨象亀OBAR 之34与1A来王丁尺A托ORD農D 蘭博h欄⑩償劇痛E,消し　…幽蟻2--ヱ垢うま轍説き曲学’’’x空港解散珊嘩灘聴馳鰯呵㊨刷繊朝潮轟仙骨肘掛垂∩臨調正明億職Y諦・競調船舶鴨鍋網Q創始高、珊印掛軸削舶軸園園園圏圏圏 A照A耀08CA統 A原像N代5廻し鎮胎的ノ 1809ほどD角V写 I棚朋㊧旅息雌.恥　3叫m2農43 BARRON COLしIER P'sHIPしLLP 重富80I宮田朗邪朗腫耽脚V菊2寄0 制叡印幡S,胤　3鼻峨-3披7 語輔随馬札潤沢も “1厳遡源閃電のし的 IMMOKAしEE, FL　34142---2631 ㈱Pu雑的0.しO隠博之Q & RO張瞳T他心蛾~億標飾重用新玉㈹恥脾臓蝕駁㌔馳.刺的之」空工務 ℃O蝉飛騨)0温香料的㊥ま腕割きV耶鱗汀曽惨謁輯扮削齢鎚ば圃鋤き粥親し麗子干し動的之一一0 C康U乙鵬GAR肝A 支離削棚GOし鯛と憫醐8組騰.融　離職-㊨砂醐帰勝手㈱肌,岬㊥軸甜’と敬礼棚田甘E †卵油り珊モl調、杓A皿正Sタ、札　軸嬉斌--湾54 DAVENPORT. ROB翰T E-&_LYNE「「E 90く鴇丁胃重し的阻翻し鴎后し　341磨象山堪政 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 鴨宮の LANE-GR龍N, PATRICIA 姻離閃、漣㊦鵬どy 腸蜜9二塁憎さ鼠閥的瓜博盲瀬棚蹴膜証,胤二部檀常2-之直視姐翻,櫛$巨小鍬的蛾 MAR IBEL CASTRO ‘CC)N平ER飛殺S 1304 DURSON C丁置MMO椴脹巳陣　容4王傷芝一-α し鍬船脚ロ両肌鱈A 亀8α7 G陣伴貯「脚駈 I翻M組雌A山際,恥　脚′ ’肋郎汀咽綬, ’曇鵬馳雛日柄A戸 jO読経騒鋤舶庸恥隆之蟻麟醐醐獣姫 1醐棚⑬操縦腹這,軋　3珊心胆-班剃り醜㌦駆刺せ 706.姫戸F巨RSON AV巨W IMMOKAし睡, Fし　34王42--2204 P自嘲鴎,「棚焼賦, 8Aし丁選獅P賓R’鍬A 往朗姐概的密の鱒的馳軸OKA暖も札　34王倣-一之愚鈍 l駆D恩随敬言を初郭肋は巨しま魚外戚0敵陣衝U綴炉の賂揚水7の8 1MMO基く粕.龍,干し　う耳143--0 恥0粗も㊦即鴻融も醍醐晦脳舟 Oし富棚傷G離郷馳駆関圃膿.瓜 1300(鴎U播きQ仁平 tMMOKAし掩,札　3範4王-○㊧樅登㊥轡電離控ぬ色盲棚的 1之03劇18丁減る丁場肋肋0氷規離./軋　3他職-2豊崎7 霊調聡離陸彊蜜駒8/09脂⑪鵬八的執漣網棚鵬3し肥土9潤明る胎剛0購粥南関 0乱調離鱈庖露噂鞭、篭隅駒鵬か霧狩るX畠鉱勘釣野」1面長N睦胸高ESUS A騒鶴∈GU畔的A騨剛A 聾6ヨ賂M朽蝉匿角S冷評町時の的撮離勘融　裁3接一一α LARA, EMIGDIO 栂的髄的蛇§, \」u徽毒嚢船種密0う剃豊田邪蛸部軟 4鋤脚㊥賞的暖i,汚し‡沖抽2---孤艶旭の陣巨か直納欄間開府、㊦膚朗ぼく2之重0窪寄せ的A津巨 IMMOKALEE, FL　34142---0 じ鵬あ湖凋髄㊤5銀働旧廟諏縦糊睦∈砂庫海曹 IM舶鍋島母乳　ま在l偲-2129ノノ肌A陣丁周旺乙」膳V因間糊之網棚咽AV鷺や⑬掲㊦歌う豊里髄膜爛,周,部樋喝--与芝電闘呈、腫衰賦偶娃周凱&蝕め叫朗炬$ 1倣4鮒的6α亡的本棚雌一札　3組4慶一…始る之梱㊤D脇晦的巨之, ‡鯛きし放剃声励孟醐肝9阻OX抑3 T棚棚OK陣し駐,脅し秘的3〇〇一了03 拙鰐H軽口鮨鵬帥鼻紙施し富田や鰯 I棚MO龍A蛇管,耽　34142--2蝉44 翻G醐I賦鎚5拙之ND S丁滅胸筋聯K創婚已捌」 3硯42---37硬 l急掘る煽て’÷ x芝5/8調c○噂a駒は面t露鮒e甲㊥5輪OI8168 巨蝦触手胱珊怨25 m舶載67鵬的鎗輔軸臨avec柄鮒⑯呂鵬鋤鍋閲園圏圏圏圏とAMO地織.腫A相隣龍平臨市区 ]緒鯉し管匡町角や巨棚鵬耀A鵬泥,融　雪4胞倣一郎紳売寄lし騰.槌鮒凪曲調凋α ユ3卿9 DUR3かこOUR丁 IMMOKAL旺, FL　34142---0 蹴只剛脚陪臣郭,圧榔腺押脚㈱ GA陣C弧工芝⑫蜂障聾柳田丁日照 I MM館悩乱長E詳し　34己(睦ニー一弘39ノ ∴湖即渡主導E臨場一榊仁和0廓OX 7了ま027 同相旺S,冊"　酌量㊥了-一一1027 0紺暖ま俄一日漁持田馳醐 1803 1上巨D AVg 醐鵬O轍A旺巨詳し　3偶42-2143 削①もA蝕堆町咽 2言う与離職師0刷ブ碍ロ 4棚舶畑牧細密か粗　さ4札42-輸2銃2 経㊦抄概略櫛乾$謎Uし鋤U槌_廓O寄別石地左之舛⑦妙⑭X補う 1晒胴O牒親睦,、軋　る的場〇〇〇了0き丁的齢G巨峨球種駁聯汀⑲ ¶脚部的WA陣四民脚亡帥管闘朗的耀β池離,批　∋4]陶砂-一之銃殺榔削軸桂肋補講鮒をT 1806 G鍬AN丁AVE 海MMO照A膿誰,肌.軸心鼻2--項鯛飽 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 園墓園 WRIGHT, TROY R & M食掃GARET A l離臆毎駅角N幸二AV王 IMMO討Aし睦。「し　嚢414オーの図回圏回国 09し8/09膳⑪柄杓甥蛤藍色棚鴎踊3関田I9細田9網拙0揮鱒唖雪隠胸潮騒㊥虎蛤樽’麟鮮轡姻戚妙鮭醜弾高徳拶轍劇e璃乙eう’’x 2 5I8"脚部的翻e w軸知合「y ⑧5う鍋鯛餌遜剥離ぬ馳電磁隠熱鶴郷㈱決遊子翻載輔弼務灘鵜繊験触弼蟻削馳櫛餓偶A息 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Name 1 Gil Martinez, Principal Planner, Collier County (239)-252-4211 2 Alan Penick (941)-480-9053 3 Pat Krause (303)-638-4288 4 Nelida Rodriguez nely@ciw-online.org 5 Julia Perkins (239)-986-0891 / julia@ciw-online.org 6 Dr. Arol Buntzman - IFHA, Inc. (917)-484-1895 / arol1112@yahoo.com 7 Rev. Miguel Estrade - IFHA, Inc. (239)-633-2181 8 Robert D. Pritt - Roetzel & Andress (239)-292-2177 / rpritt@ralaw.com 9 Jotta Smith II - IFHA (239)-793-5055 10 Carleton Cleveland - IFHA (239)-302-2496 11 Linda Cleveland - IFHA (239)-302-2496 / lindacleveland830@gmail.com 12 Betty Mangos - IFHA (239)-254-9883 / bmangos710@gmail.com 13 Ralph Pollock (303)-913-4079 / ralph@apaccess.com 14 Laura Safer Espinoza (941)-204-8547 / hon.s.espinoza@gmail.com 15 John Riley (239)-687-6415 / john@rileyphilanthropy.com 16 Gerardo Reyes Chavez (239)-657-8311 / gerardo@ciw-online.org 17 Canon Sandora - Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. (239)-692-6738 / canon@boralengineering.com 18 Austin Butts - Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. (239)-910-7853 / austin@boralengineering.com IMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE REZONE (RPUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET Thursday, December 19th at 6pm Contact Information 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 668 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) d Fl () Dec. 23th, 2019 NIM Sypnosis Objective: The Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. Neighborhood Information Meeting took place at Fellowship Church on Lake Trafford Rd. in Immokalee, FL on December 19 th, 2019 at 6pm. A total of 18 people were at the meeting (please see sign-in list). The objective of the meeting was to share information about the project and explain about the rezoning application from RSF-4 to RPUD (allowing 13.44 units/acre) with the public, while following Collier County protocol. The information that was shared included:  The proposed uses and density of the project  The proposed Master Plan  The current LDC zoning district uses and development regulations Presentation: To start the meeting, Dr. Arol Buntzman, Chairman of the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. shared from the cover letter handout the proposed use of the property, detailing the purpose of the project. Dr. Arol Buntzman shared from the handout, “Decent, safe, affordable housing is more than a roof over our heads. When homes are decent, safe and affordable, children are healthier and they do better in school, workers are more productive, families have income for other basic need on a sustainable basis, while boosting the local economy. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) When rent consumes more than half of household income, there is not enough left over for healthy food, healthcare, decent cloths, childcare, early childhood learning or after school programs. In Immokalee, farmworker families, and other low-income families, that live year-round in Immokalee, often spend more than half of their income on rent. The Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. was organized by an alliance of non-profit foundations, NGOs, faith-based organizations and individuals that believe that everyone deserves a chance to live in decent affordable hurricane resistant housing. IFHA’s plan is to develop 128 two and three bedroom decent, affordable, hurricane resistant, low energy, low maintenance housing units that can be rented to low income and very-low income that reside in Immokalee year-round, at rents they can afford.” Canon Sandora, Project Manager, Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. also shared from the handouts, from the Site Map, and from the Master Plan, regarding the proposed use of the property, and specifics on the Master Plan: Canon Sandora shared, “The proposed affordable housing development location is a 9.52 acre property (Parcel ID: 0074280005) on the corner of Lake Trafford Road and North 19th Street in Immokalee, FL. The zoning of the property, at the time of Rezoning application submittal was RSF-4, which allows 4 dwelling units per acre. Our application is to Rezone the property from RSF-4 to RPUD, which would allow the property to have 13.44 dwelling units per acre. The subject property is surrounded by several single-family residential properties and is adjacent to a multi-family property, also on Lake Trafford Road. The proposed development will consist of 8 – 16 unit buildings and a community center, along with parking, sidewalks, solid waste enclosures, bicycle racks, recreational areas, detention areas, a preserve, landscaping, and utilities (see Master Site Plan).” The current LDC zoning district uses and development regulations was also shared by Canon Sandora, “So, as I mentioned the current use is the property is vacant and its zoned RS-4 at the time we first applied. Which stands for residential single family 4, so that means four units per acre. And what the development regulations is for that is it’s a platted lot. They have to be at least 75 by 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 75 feet. The setbacks are 25 feet in the front and rear. The side setbacks are 7 and a half feet. So now we are rezoning to RPUD to allow 13.44 units per acre. The setbacks are going to be 30 feet 30 feet … along the roads of the right-of-way. So, along N 19 th Street and Lake Trafford Road. On the other two sides of the property they are 25 feet.” Bob Pritt, Attorney of Law, shared some information about the project, including information about the rezoning to RPUD, “One other thing, you mentioned RPUD that means residential planned unit development. If you look all over the county and Florida, on the way out here you saw various areas the water ways, wherever you came from. That is all planned unit developments, sometime called planned urban developments. Those are for the purpose of making sure you have all these amenities and that things are done right in all the different neighborhoods.” Question/Comments: Once these points were covered, the meeting’s attendees were given the chance to ask questions and comments. The questions/comments were: Question 1: Pat Krause asked, “What is a detention area”? Canon Sandora responded, “Detention area is for draining. So, from the buildings, when there is a rain event you don’t want flooding on site. So, you have the water drain to a detention area. You are required to have a certain amount; the engineers will do drainage calculations to figure out how much detention area is required so there is no flooding on site.” Question 2: Pat Krause asked “So, will it be marshy or wet at all”? Canon Sandora responded, “So, we haven’t actually designed it. We will do it at the site development plane, when we apply for that is when we actually design that. So were not 100% sure if it’s going to be a wet detention area. You see them they’re like little lakes and detention ponds. Or it can be a dry detention area, depending on how much, you know, area.” Question 3: Ralph Pollock asked, “Where it says ‘Track B’, what can you do with that Track B land”? 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Canon Sandora responded, “Track B is a preserve, that’s what Track A is marking the area basically other than the preserve. Where there can be development. We are required to set a certain amount of property aside for a preserve, which is labelled Track B.” Question 4: Ralph Pollock asked, “Can kids play soccer there if they wanted to? Not really.” Canon Sandora responded, “No.” Dr. Arol Buntzman responded, “It has to be set aside a preserve for scrub jays as well as for vegetation. Robert Pritt responded, “So, you get greater density than maybe you would otherwise be able to get but in exchange you have to have preservation areas and things like that.” Dr. Arol Buntzman also stated, “Provides a great open feeling but we can’t play in it or use it. But there are plenty of open areas, as you can see on the site, where kids can play. There isn’t enough room for a full soccer field unfortunately, but there is for a half-court basketball court. And we were recently told that the NBA might be willing to pay for the basketball court.” Once attendees were given a chance ask questions and comment, Dr. Arol Buntzman ensured that everything that needed to be covered as set forth by Collier County was covered, to the best of our abilities, by asking Gil Martinez, Principal Planner of Collier County Zoning Department if there was anything else that needed to be covered. Gil Martinez said, “At this point no, I think it was a very good job of speaking.” Conclusion: At that point, everyone was thanked for attending the meeting. The people that attended the meeting had encouraging and supportive words to say about the project. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) d Fl () Dec 19, 2019 NIM Transcribed Recording Dr. Arol Buntzman “Good Evening everybody. My name is Arol Buntzman, I am the chair of the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance. Which is a Florida Non-profit 501C3 public benefit corporation. I am really pleased to be here tonight to share some information. The project that we are working on is approximately 10 acres and is almost two blocks North of here on Lake Trafford Road. To build decent, safe and affordable housing. As you know decent affordable housing is more than just a roof over people’s heads. When homes are decent, safe and affordable then children are healthier, they do better in school, workers are healthier and more productive, and families have income for other basic needs on a sustainable basis; While boosting the local economy. When rent consumes more than half of household income, as it does for many of the Immokalee farm worker families and other low-income families that live year-round in Immokalee. There is not enough left over for healthy food, health care, decent clothes, childcare, early- childhood learning or after school programs. The Immokalee Fair 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Housing Alliance was organized by an alliance of faith based: organizations, foundations, non-profit foundations, NGO’s, and individuals that believe that everyone deserves a chance to live in decent, affordable and hurricane resistant housing. Our plan is to develop 128 two/three bedroom affordable, hurricane resistant, low energy, and low maintenance housing units. That can be rented to low income and very low-income residents in Immokalee at rents they can afford. Thank You.” Canon Sandora “Thanks Dr. Arol. I am Canon Sandora, I am representing Boral Engineering. We are the civil engineering firm that is working with Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance. I am the project manager on this project. And we are going through a rezoning application pro cess with Collier County. So, the proposed affordable housing development location is a 9.52 Acre property on the corner of Lake Trafford Road and N 19th Street in Immokalee, Florida. The zoning of the property at the time of rezoning application submitted was RS-4, which allows four dwelling units per acre. Our application is to rezone the property from RS-4 to RPUD. Which will allow the property to have 13.44 dwelling units per acre. And just recently on Dec 10, they upped the base density to 6 dwelling units per acre for this parcel. The subject property is surrounded by several single-family residential properties and is adjacent to multi family property also on Lake Trafford Road.” 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) “So, I’m going to show you guys the map, can everybody see the map from where they’re at? You also have a copy of it in your handouts. So, here is the subject property, right along Lake Trafford Road. And it is at the corner of N 19th St. Right there North-West of the intersection is the 9.52 Acre property. And as you can see there is some development in the surrounding area as I mentioned. There is single- family houses to the North. The property right here to the West is vacant right now. To the South there is single family residential units. And to the West, nope to the East sorry, there is multifamily housing.” “So, about the proposed development, the proposed development will consist of 8 sixteen-unit buildings and a community center. Along with parking, sidewalks, solid waste enclosure, bicycle racks, recreational areas, detention areas, a preserve, landscaping and utilities. So here on the site map you can see where the buildings are going to be located, there’s eight of them. In the middle of the site there is going to be a detention area. There is going to be two entrances: One is going to be on Lake Trafford Road, and one is on N 19Th Street. And its going to have a loop so you can enter/exit from either one. There is also a preserve on the NW part of the property. Were going to have recreation areas/open space for the families to be able to recreate and play.” 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Dr. Arol Buntzman “Andres mentioned the community center, which will not only function as a community center for meetings or other functions for the people that live there. But will also have classes for early childhood education and after school education.” Canon Sandora “So, as I mentioned the current use is the property is vacant and its zoned RS-4 at the time we first applied. Which stands for residential single family 4, so that means four units per acre. And what the development regulations is for that is it’s a platted lot. They have to be at least 75 by 75 feet. The setbacks are 25 feet in the front and rear. The side setbacks are 7 and a half feet. So now we are rezoning to RPUD to allow 13.44 units per acre. The setbacks are going to be 30 feet. Actually, if you look at your master site plan you can see the setbacks. Yep, they are actually 30 feet along the roads of the right-of- way. So, along N 19th Street and Lake Trafford Road. On the other two sides of the property they are 25 feet.” “And I got all that, okay so that pretty much covers it. We can open it up to questions and comments.” 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Dr. Arol Buntzman “Does anyone have any questions”? Pat Krause “What is a detention area”? Cannon Sandora “Detention area is for draining. So, from the buildings, when there is a rain event you don’t want flooding on site. So, you have the water drain to a detention area. You are required to have a certain amount; the engineers will do drainage calculations to figure out how much detention area is required so there is no flooding on site.” Pat Krause “So, will it be marshy or wet at all”? Cannon Sandora “So, we haven’t actually designed it. We will do it at the site development plane, when we apply for that is when we actually design that. So were not 100% sure if its going to be a wet detention area. You see them they’re like little lakes and detention ponds. Or it can be a dry detention area, depending on how much, you know, area.” 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Robert D. Pritt “Ladies and gentlemen, we need to get everybody’s name spoke. What was your name”? Pat Krause “Pat Krause” Robert D. Pritt “What happens here, reason we are recording this is that the county requires us to give the name of anybody who spoke. Hopefully everybody signed in, in the back, and gave their phone number and email address. That way the county will have a record of everyone who came to the neighborhood information meeting. And I can tell you that the county commission and the county planned commission look at these things very carefully. They actually go through and listen to what people say because they can’t be here for everything, but they do want to know what the people are saying. So this is the reason for that. One other thing, you mentioned RPUD that means residential planned unit development. If you look all over the county and Florida, on the way out here you saw various areas the 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) water ways, wherever you came from. That is all planned unit developments, sometime called planned urban developments. Those are for the purpose of making sure you have all these amenities and that things are done right in all the different neighborhoods.” “And by the way my name is Robert Pritt, I am the attorney and assistant with the land use matters here tonight. Gil, did I cover everything? Perfect, thank you.” Gil Martinez “For the record, Gil Martinez Principle Planner with Collier County.” Robert Pritt “Right, Gil comes out wherever there are neighborhood information meetings and monitors the meetings. To help make sure we cover anything we have to cover. So, anybody who has anything that they wish to say just identify yourself, first and last name, and then have at it.” Cannon Sandora “Do you want to have uhm...” 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Dr. Arol Buntzman “Anybody else? Yes.” Ralph Pollock “Ralph Pollock. Where it says ‘Track B’, what can you do with that Track B land”? Cannon Sandora “Track B is a preserve, that’s what Track A is marking the area basically other than the preserve. Where there can be development. We are required to set a certain amount of property aside for a preserve, which is labelled Track B.” Ralph Pollock “Can kids play soccer there if they wanted to? Not really.” Cannon Sandora “No.” 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Dr. Arol Buntzman “It has to be set aside a preserve for scrub jays as well as for vegetation.” Robert Pritt “So, you get greater density than maybe you would otherwise be able to get but in exchange you have to have preservation areas and things like that.” Dr. Arol Buntzman “Provides a great open feeling but we can’t play in it or use it. But there are plenty of open areas, as you can see on the site, where kids can play. There isn’t enough room for a full soccer field unfortunately, but there is for a half-court basketball court. And we were recently told that the NBA might be willing to pay for the basketball court.” Cannon Sandora “That would be awesome.” 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Dr. Arol Buntzman “Any other question or comments? Gil is there anything else we need to check or cover”? Robert Pritt “Let me check with Mr. Gill, can you think of anything else we need to cover? Gill Martinez “At this point no, I think it was a very good job of speaking.” Robert Pritt “Check your checklist one more time there and make sure we covered everything.” 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Canon Sandora “Yep yep, we did that. The density of the property, the master plan. Yep, shared that and we shared this here. The current, yep shared that. Dr. Arol Buntzman “Good. I know when I put my name, I did not put my phone number or email address. I’m going to go do that now and for anyone who didn’t, please do before you leave.” Robert Pritt “The documents we handed out we will put those in the record so the county staff and county decision makers can see who was also here.” Dr. Arol Buntzman “Very good. Thank you very much for coming.” Cannon Sandora “Thank you so much.” 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) XLAKE TRAFFORD ROAD NORTH 19TH STREETSUBJECT PROPERTY 1 SITE MAPOF SHEETDATEBYREVISION DESCRIPTIONOWNER:PROJECT: DATE:ENGINEER: ANDRES BORAL, PE, MBALICENSE # 80373 FBPE # 315529911 CORKSCREW RD, STE 222, ESTERO, FL 33928WWW.BORALENGINEERING.COM(P) 239-692-050919-111 06/19 RPUDIMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSINGALLIANCE, INC.IMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSINGALLIANCE, INC.IMMOKALEE, FLORIDA1 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) XXX30' BUILDING SETBACK 25' BUILDING SETBACK 30' BUILDING SETBACK 25' BUILDING SETBACK LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD 80' ROW NORTH 19TH STREET80' ROWZONING: RSF-4 USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: A-HMO USE: VACANT DETENTION AREA 0.74 ACRES 16-UNIT 2 STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT 16-UNIT, 2-STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT COMMUNITY CENTER 3,100 SF 10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) ZONING:VR USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RMF-12 USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RSF-4 USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RPUD USE: RESIDENTIAL HALF-COURT BASKETBALL PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PRESERVE 1.41 ACRES 16-UNIT, 2-STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT 16-UNIT, 2-STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT 16-UNIT 2 STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT 16-UNIT 2 STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT 16-UNIT 2 STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT 16-UNIT 2 STORY BUILDING 9,425 SF FOOTPRINT RECREATIONAL AREA RECREATIONAL AREA RECREATIONAL AREA SOLID WASTE ENCLOSURE CONCRETE PAD 24' ASPHALT DRIVE AISLE 6' WIDE LEE COUNTY ELECTRIC CO-OP ROW EASEMENT O.R. 0572, PAGE 0253 10' WIDE DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT O.R. 5197, PAGE 3087 BICYCLE RACK CONCRETE PAD (TYP.) RECREATIONAL AREA SOLID WASTE ENCLOSURE CONCRETE PAD EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK 10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER 25' BUILDING SETBACK 15' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER 6' TYPE B RESERVATION BUFFER TWO BUS PARKING SPACES 10' ACCESSORY USE STRUCTURE BUFFER RECREATIONAL AREA CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) TRACT B TRACT A ZONING: C-3 USE: COMMERCIAL RECREATIONAL AREA 1 MASTER SITE PLANEXHIBIT C1" = 40' 0 20 40 OF SHEETDATEBYREVISION DESCRIPTIONOWNER:PROJECT: DATE:ENGINEER: ANDRES BORAL, PE, MBALICENSE # 80373 FBPE # 315529911 CORKSCREW RD, STE 222, ESTERO, FL 33928WWW.BORALENGINEERING.COM(P) 239-692-0509SITE DATA TABLE SITE ADDRESS: PARCEL ID: SITE AREA: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: FUTURE LAND USE : DEVELOPMENT TYPE: BUILDING TYPE: LAKE TRAFFORD RD. & NORTH 19TH STREET, IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 00074280005 9.52 ACRES RSF-4 RPUD MED. RESID. SUBDIST. AFFORDABLE HOUSING 2 STORY CONDOS/APARTMENTS 19-111 06/19 RPUDIMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSINGALLIANCE, INC.IMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSINGALLIANCE, INC.IMMOKALEE, FLORIDA1 ZONING RESIDENTIAL VACANT LAKE TRAFFORD RD. N. 19TH ST. NORTH: WEST: SOUTH: EAST: (RSF-4, RPUD) (A-HMO) (ROW) (ROW) DENSITY ALLOWABLE UNITS FOR PROJECT SITE: 9.52 ACRES X 13.44 UNITS/ACRE = 128 UNITS NOTE 1. PRESERVE MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF A TYPE 'B' BUFFER ARE MET, A 6' WIDE BUFFER RESERVATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED ON THE MASTER PLAN. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PRESERVE DOES NOT MEET BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING, PLANTINGS WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE 6' WIDE RESERVATION TO MEET THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. THE TYPE,SIZE AND NUMBER OF SUCH PLANTINGS, IF NECESSARY, WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF INITIAL SDP AND INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE SDP. 2. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATIONS DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. PRESERVE CALCULATION ACCORDING TO LDC 3.05.07.B.1, THE REQUIRED PRESERVE AREA IS 15% OF NATIVE VEGETATION, PRIOR TO CLEARING (NOT INCLUDING EASEMENTS). (SITE AREA - EASEMENT AREA) x 15% = REQ. PRESERVE AREA (9.52 AC - 0.11 AC) X 15% = 1.41 ACRES REQ. PROVIDED: 1.41 ACRES 9/16/19 CS ADDRESSING 1ST RD. COMMENTS11/6/19 CS ADDRESSING 2ND RD. COMMENTS9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. (IFHA) A Florida Not-For Profit 501c3 public benefit Corporation. Decent, safe, affordable housing is more than a roof over our heads. When homes are decent, safe and affordable, children are healthier and they do better in school, workers are more productive, families have income for other basic need on a sustainable basis, while boosting the local economy. When rent consumes more than half of household income, there is not enough left over for healthy food, healthcare, decent cloths, childcare, early childhood learning or after school programs. In Immokalee, farmworker families, and other low-income families, that live year-round in Immokalee, often spend more than half of their income on rent. The Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. was organized by an alliance of non-profit foundations, NGOs, faith-based organizations and individuals that believe that everyone deserves a chance to live in decent affordable hurricane resistant housing. IFHA’s plan is to develop 128 two and three bedroom decent, affordable, hurricane resistant, low energy, low maintenance housing units that can be rented to low income and very-low income that reside in Immokalee year-round, at rents they can afford. Please help make that happen. Dr. Arol I. Buntzman Chairman / CEO Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. From Boral Engineering & Design, Inc.: The proposed affordable housing development location is a 9.52 acre property (Parcel ID: 0074280005) on the corner of Lake Trafford Road and North 19th Street in Immokalee, FL. The zoning of the property, at the time of Rezoning application submittal was RSF-4, which allows 4 dwelling units per acre. Our application is to Rezone the property from RSF-4 to RPUD, which would allow the property to have 13.44 dwelling units per acre. The subject property is surrounded by several single-family residential properties and is adjacent to a multi-family property, also on Lake Trafford Road. The proposed development will consist of 8 – 16 unit buildings and a community center, along with parking, sidewalks, solid waste enclosures, bicycle racks, recreational areas, detention areas, a preserve, landscaping, and utilities (see Master Site Plan). Thank you for your time and consideration. Canon Sandora, E.I. Project Manager Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) d Fl () Jan. 16th, 2020 Re: Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance Multi-Family Residential Development (PL20190000734) Enclosed please find the following documents in accordance with Collier County’s Neighborhood Information Meeting requirements: One (1) original executed Affidavit of Compliance (signed by Andres Boral); One (1) copy of the Neighborhood Information Meeting Notice advertisement which ran in the Naples Daily News on January 16th, 2020; One (1) copy of Neighborhood Information Meeting Notification Letter sent to Property Owners on January 14th, 2020; One (1) copy of Property Owners list. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you, Boral Engineering, Inc. Andres Boral, P.E. Principal Engineer Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby c,e血fy血at pursuant to Ordinance ‘200441 ,, Of也e Collier‘ County Land Development Code士did cause_.the attached newspaper advel.dseme血to appear and I did give notice by mail to血e fojIowing property owners and/br- COndom壷um and civic associadons whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an謡plieation Te餌場st for a rezo壷ng, PUD amendment or conditional useつat least 15碑ys phor to宙e scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. Fbr fhe puァpos候s Q/ th料req写lireme妨the mmes c7nd 。妨esses Qfprqpe砂OWne手5 Shall be虎emed rho▲Je C堆Pearing on /he latest t肋rひlls q戸Collier Coun少and a均′ Otherpersons Or entities who have maくねa /brmal request Qfthe coun砂/O be not之leみ　The said notice COntained血e laymen’s description of也e′ Si記prope鱒y of proposed change・ and血e date, time, and place of a Neighbo血ood Infomation Meeting登 Per血e attached le請ers, PrOPerty OWner’s工is , and copy Qf 11evSPaper advertisement whieh are St如e of耳l〇五da County of Collier 上皇d轡。f 少、血o i争p聖堂型y as ide虹i丘cation. く己∥止し印の`「′、叫…r叱 Printed Name ofNot餌y (NotaIy Seaり隊 R9∈ Orld8 040 「eS 3 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Net Amount Tax Amount Total Amount Payment Method Payment Amount Amount Due BORAL ENGINEERING & 9911 CORKSCREW RD STE 222 ESTERO FL 33928--333 $329.00 $0.00 $329.00 $0.00Invoice $329.000004003405 AD# 1495490 Account Sales Rep: kthor Order Taker: kthor 01/14/2020Order Created End DateStart Date# InsProduct Column Lines 01/16/2020 01/16/2020 1NDN-Naples Daily News 2.00 16 01/16/2020 01/16/2020 1NDN-naplesnews.com 2.00 16 * ALL TRANSACTIONS CONSIDERED PAID IN FULL UPON CLEARANCE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTION 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Text of Ad: 01/14/2020 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road Suite 222, Estero, FL 33928  239-692-6738  www.boralengineering.com Dear Neighbor, You are invited to attend a Neighborhood Information Meeting held by Dr. Arol Buntzman, CEO/Chairman of the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc., and Canon Sandora, Project Manager of Boral Engineering & Design, Inc., regarding the proposed Rezoning of a 9.52 acre property located on the north side of Lake Trafford Road, west of the intersection of North 19 th Street and Lake Trafford Road. The Rezone from RSF-4 to RPUD has been proposed in order to accommodate for a new, decent, safe, hurricane resistant, affordable housing development for farmworker and other low-income families on the property. Monday, February 3rd, 2020 at 6pm Fellowship Church 1411 Lake Trafford Rd., Immokalee, FL 34142 RSVP is not required. Please call (239)-692-6738 for any additional information regarding the meeting. Thank you, Canon Sandora, E.I. Project Manager Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 曹膏⑱ 傭囲穐醐宙」賦頓孤榊脂庫街耶醐盤8鑓宮に巨富取離臣 l博鵬のKA腹聴靴　竜食餌曲名・ AYALA, MARY ANN 12且8潤誰　対物醐圃耽l心髄詳し　錐鳳埠2-薫離獅愚説軸心玉妊Z,\J息張、辱忠子同調もY J ′ Pめ屯かXl瞬0 IMMOKALEE, Fし　34143--輸1030 C患e脚的部門押抑圧$の利一醐轍捷; P$駁〕猟望ずの輔M命給鯉詳し　動地檎〇〇〇合羽・馳州側翌, Gヂ虻V食料㊥SC軸濃艶ゆ屯聡朗明日邸陸棚朗0㈱臆己,干し　勤脇之-0 CRE洲S &棚輔陣DEN軽量N丁AしINC 甲OI関X豊与了醐瞭琳親睦.純　≡紳士純一支部′ C成増琵騨倉茂㊨内剛重付鯉沼瓦劇搬淑上陸 l棚轍庵も乱　34王鴨2-之632 }D鋤書聖常軌距戸必譲秘EC船場501 V髄\削うヽNÅ乱どな点し’翻亀的--嶋 DAVENPORT. ROB輔T E & LYNETTE 9064丁惟し関馳A削堪§,批　曳抱的-一指写4 D巨C陶醍離鳩.搬A巴涯躍らU§ ㌣ 2崖心持00叫や魚津亙しg拙G櫨ACRgS差し　33935--○○ 蘭親閲醍蜜’ 09し8/0軌合⑧煽^車軸粥!鱒dし棚胴I9油蝉乙勘」0棚弧鍋的鎗騨$銚§⑪触糊輔的網只軸軸鰐経るXぶ鎚蜂聞く AGu栂A瞭」勝臣. G §偽照鍋飯鯛矧岱軽A爛工8之寄峨AVビ I棚棚㊦輯,F」鍋14m: 8ARRON COしLiER PRTNRSHP LしLP a6⑦0-箆綴じ駄蚤博短悠「王縛鰍竹治盈9勘し鯉吟駐§,帰し二三動地競蘭塑7 、B輔細りD亜,、肌Å農蛤瓦N「O同船」Oうど棚ANU重し巧醐U膿且Z 1810 GRANT AVE l醐㊥船艇臣′配　雪像帥之一社ヨネ G稔G煎恵庭留剛巨劫①和博博Q脳虹E手駒訪日の璃捌秘 i棚棚Q蒋蝕時、町　謡必争--珊敵軌弱敵鞘的Y 鳴㊥樹減軽聞く棚髄離職肘詔弱「靖舶脚酬丁龍も宮嶋“10ユ N冷P蝿も乱34工事2-0 CRE海霧丁E髄SA博胆NDQZA 雌80引惟置場偽り麿蹴蛇庭も配秘離脇」狐他節的盈峨脚俄櫛急患尺的毎①上N I祝融0碇規_嘩,干し　玉4己4之--之63之 )D鋤告的P蛾閏,」涯戸戸赦I髄離職船 ‡鯵召㊥且鵬1開脚、NA申、畦も、札　報粗密0-「O DAVENPORT, ROBERT E &‘しYNETTE 9064丁HEし剛隅観官争乱　誰1鉱山-重繁的戦Cの税源. 」均か博押竹とAG棚減S 陣公印思し」Å患U NAS.巨象亀OBAR 之34与1A来王丁尺A托ORD農D 蘭博h欄⑩償劇痛E,消し　…幽蟻2--ヱ垢うま轍説き曲学’’’x空港解散珊嘩灘聴馳鰯呵㊨刷繊朝潮轟仙骨肘掛垂∩臨調正明億職Y諦・競調船舶鴨鍋網Q創始高、珊印掛軸削舶軸園園園圏圏圏 A照A耀08CA統 A原像N代5廻し鎮胎的ノ 1809ほどD角V写 I棚朋㊧旅息雌.恥　3叫m2農43 BARRON COLしIER P'sHIPしLLP 重富80I宮田朗邪朗腫耽脚V菊2寄0 制叡印幡S,胤　3鼻峨-3披7 語輔随馬札潤沢も “1厳遡源閃電のし的 IMMOKAしEE, FL　34142---2631 ㈱Pu雑的0.しO隠博之Q & RO張瞳T他心蛾~億標飾重用新玉㈹恥脾臓蝕駁㌔馳.刺的之」空工務 ℃O蝉飛騨)0温香料的㊥ま腕割きV耶鱗汀曽惨謁輯扮削齢鎚ば圃鋤き粥親し麗子干し動的之一一0 C康U乙鵬GAR肝A 支離削棚GOし鯛と憫醐8組騰.融　離職-㊨砂醐帰勝手㈱肌,岬㊥軸甜’と敬礼棚田甘E †卵油り珊モl調、杓A皿正Sタ、札　軸嬉斌--湾54 DAVENPORT. ROB翰T E-&_LYNE「「E 90く鴇丁胃重し的阻翻し鴎后し　341磨象山堪政 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 鴨宮の LANE-GR龍N, PATRICIA 姻離閃、漣㊦鵬どy 腸蜜9二塁憎さ鼠閥的瓜博盲瀬棚蹴膜証,胤二部檀常2-之直視姐翻,櫛$巨小鍬的蛾 MAR IBEL CASTRO ‘CC)N平ER飛殺S 1304 DURSON C丁置MMO椴脹巳陣　容4王傷芝一-α し鍬船脚ロ両肌鱈A 亀8α7 G陣伴貯「脚駈 I翻M組雌A山際,恥　脚′ ’肋郎汀咽綬, ’曇鵬馳雛日柄A戸 jO読経騒鋤舶庸恥隆之蟻麟醐醐獣姫 1醐棚⑬操縦腹這,軋　3珊心胆-班剃り醜㌦駆刺せ 706.姫戸F巨RSON AV巨W IMMOKAし睡, Fし　34王42--2204 P自嘲鴎,「棚焼賦, 8Aし丁選獅P賓R’鍬A 往朗姐概的密の鱒的馳軸OKA暖も札　34王倣-一之愚鈍 l駆D恩随敬言を初郭肋は巨しま魚外戚0敵陣衝U綴炉の賂揚水7の8 1MMO基く粕.龍,干し　う耳143--0 恥0粗も㊦即鴻融も醍醐晦脳舟 Oし富棚傷G離郷馳駆関圃膿.瓜 1300(鴎U播きQ仁平 tMMOKAし掩,札　3範4王-○㊧樅登㊥轡電離控ぬ色盲棚的 1之03劇18丁減る丁場肋肋0氷規離./軋　3他職-2豊崎7 霊調聡離陸彊蜜駒8/09脂⑪鵬八的執漣網棚鵬3し肥土9潤明る胎剛0購粥南関 0乱調離鱈庖露噂鞭、篭隅駒鵬か霧狩るX畠鉱勘釣野」1面長N睦胸高ESUS A騒鶴∈GU畔的A騨剛A 聾6ヨ賂M朽蝉匿角S冷評町時の的撮離勘融　裁3接一一α LARA, EMIGDIO 栂的髄的蛇§, \」u徽毒嚢船種密0う剃豊田邪蛸部軟 4鋤脚㊥賞的暖i,汚し‡沖抽2---孤艶旭の陣巨か直納欄間開府、㊦膚朗ぼく2之重0窪寄せ的A津巨 IMMOKALEE, FL　34142---0 じ鵬あ湖凋髄㊤5銀働旧廟諏縦糊睦∈砂庫海曹 IM舶鍋島母乳　ま在l偲-2129ノノ肌A陣丁周旺乙」膳V因間糊之網棚咽AV鷺や⑬掲㊦歌う豊里髄膜爛,周,部樋喝--与芝電闘呈、腫衰賦偶娃周凱&蝕め叫朗炬$ 1倣4鮒的6α亡的本棚雌一札　3組4慶一…始る之梱㊤D脇晦的巨之, ‡鯛きし放剃声励孟醐肝9阻OX抑3 T棚棚OK陣し駐,脅し秘的3〇〇一了03 拙鰐H軽口鮨鵬帥鼻紙施し富田や鰯 I棚MO龍A蛇管,耽　34142--2蝉44 翻G醐I賦鎚5拙之ND S丁滅胸筋聯K創婚已捌」 3硯42---37硬 l急掘る煽て’÷ x芝5/8調c○噂a駒は面t露鮒e甲㊥5輪OI8168 巨蝦触手胱珊怨25 m舶載67鵬的鎗輔軸臨avec柄鮒⑯呂鵬鋤鍋閲園圏圏圏圏とAMO地織.腫A相隣龍平臨市区 ]緒鯉し管匡町角や巨棚鵬耀A鵬泥,融　雪4胞倣一郎紳売寄lし騰.槌鮒凪曲調凋α ユ3卿9 DUR3かこOUR丁 IMMOKAL旺, FL　34142---0 蹴只剛脚陪臣郭,圧榔腺押脚㈱ GA陣C弧工芝⑫蜂障聾柳田丁日照 I MM館悩乱長E詳し　34己(睦ニー一弘39ノ ∴湖即渡主導E臨場一榊仁和0廓OX 7了ま027 同相旺S,冊"　酌量㊥了-一一1027 0紺暖ま俄一日漁持田馳醐 1803 1上巨D AVg 醐鵬O轍A旺巨詳し　3偶42-2143 削①もA蝕堆町咽 2言う与離職師0刷ブ碍ロ 4棚舶畑牧細密か粗　さ4札42-輸2銃2 経㊦抄概略櫛乾$謎Uし鋤U槌_廓O寄別石地左之舛⑦妙⑭X補う 1晒胴O牒親睦,、軋　る的場〇〇〇了0き丁的齢G巨峨球種駁聯汀⑲ ¶脚部的WA陣四民脚亡帥管闘朗的耀β池離,批　∋4]陶砂-一之銃殺榔削軸桂肋補講鮒をT 1806 G鍬AN丁AVE 海MMO照A膿誰,肌.軸心鼻2--項鯛飽 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 園墓園 WRIGHT, TROY R & M食掃GARET A l離臆毎駅角N幸二AV王 IMMO討Aし睦。「し　嚢414オーの図回圏回国 09し8/09膳⑪柄杓甥蛤藍色棚鴎踊3関田I9細田9網拙0揮鱒唖雪隠胸潮騒㊥虎蛤樽’麟鮮轡姻戚妙鮭醜弾高徳拶轍劇e璃乙eう’’x 2 5I8"脚部的翻e w軸知合「y ⑧5う鍋鯛餌遜剥離ぬ馳電磁隠熱鶴郷㈱決遊子翻載輔弼務灘鵜繊験触弼蟻削馳櫛餓偶A息 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Name 1 Ralph Pollock, IFHA (303) 913-4079/Ralph@apaccess.com 2 Timothy Finn (239) 252-4312/Timothyfinn@colliercounty.gov 3 Canon Sandora - Boral Eng. & Design, Inc. (239) 692-6738/Canon@boralengineering.com 4 Alan Penide, IFHA (941) 480-9053/Adpenide@comcast.net 5 Dr. Arol Buntzman - IFHA (917) 484-1895/Arol1112@yahoo.com 6 Ashley Jones (239) 210-4016/Ashley.Jones@uss.salvationarmy.org 7 Betty Mangos - IFHA (239) 254-9883/Bmangos710@gmail.com 8 Jotta Smith II - IFHA (239) 793-5055 9 Melissa Cook (239) 867-6267/Mcook@BBCHI.com 10 John Riley (239)-302-2496/(239) 687-6415/John@rileyphilanthropy.com 11 Miguel Estrada, IFHA (239) 633-2181/Miguelestrada@hotmail.com IMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE REZONE (RPUD) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET Monday, Febuary 3rd at 6:00 PM Contact Information 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) d Fl () February 3rd, 2020 NIM Synopsis Objective: The Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. Neighborhood Information Meeting took place at Fellowship Church on Lake Trafford Rd. in Immokalee, FL on February 3rd, 2020 at 6pm. A total of 11 people were at the meeting (please see sign-in list). The objective of the meeting was to share information about the project and explain about the rezoning application from RSF-4 to RPUD (allowing 13.44 units/acre) with the public, while following Collier County protocol. The information that was shared included: • The proposed uses and density of the project • The proposed Master Plan • The current LDC zoning district uses and development regulations Presentation: To start the meeting, Dr. Arol Buntzman, Chairman of the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. shared from the cover letter handout the proposed use of the property, detailing the purpose of the project. Dr. Arol Buntzman shared from the handout, “The Alliance. was organized by a group of non-profit foundations, NGOs, faith-based organizations and individuals that believe everyone deserves a chance to live in decent, affordable, hurricane resistant housing. Our plan is to develop 128 two and three bedroom decent, affordable, hurricane resistant, low energy and low maintenance housing units that can be rented to low income and very-low income/moderate-income families that reside year- round, at rents they can afford. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Our goal is to make sure that people don’t have to spend more than 30 percent of their household income on rent. As many of you know, or most of you know when homes are decent, safe and affordable its much more than a roof over a family’s head. Children are healthier, they do better in school, people on their jobs are more productive and the families have income for other basic needs on a sustainable basis while at the same time boosting the economy. When rent consumes more than half of household income there is not much left over for healthy food, health care, decent clothes, childcare, early childhood learning and after school programs.” Canon Sandora, Project Manager, Boral Engineering & Design, Inc. also shared from the handouts, from the Site Map, and from the Master Plan, regarding the proposed use of the property, and specifics on the Master Plan: Canon Sandora shared, “The proposed affordable housing development location is a 9.52-acre property (Parcel ID: 0074280005) on the corner of Lake Trafford Road and North 19 th Street in Immokalee, FL. The zoning at the time of rezoning application submittal was RSF-4, which allows 4 dwelling units per acre. Our application is to Rezone the property from RSF-4 to RPUD, which would allow the property to have 13.44 dwelling units per acre. The subject property is surrounded by several single-family residential properties and is adjacent to a multi-family property, also on Lake Trafford Road. The proposed development will consist of 8 – 16-unit buildings and a community center, along with parking, sidewalks, solid waste enclosures, bicycle racks, recreational areas, detention areas, a preserve, landscaping, and utilities (see Master Site Plan).” The current LDC zoning district uses and development regulations w as also shared by Canon Sandora, “So, as I mentioned the current use is the property is vacant and its zoned RS -4 at the time we first applied. Which stands for residential single family 4, so that means four units per acre. And what the development regulations is for that is it’s a platted lot. They have to be at least 75 by 75 feet. The setbacks are 25 feet in the front and rear. The side setbacks are 7 and a half feet. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) So now we are rezoning to RPUD to allow 13.44 units per acre. The setbacks are going to be 30 feet 30 feet … along the roads of the right -of-way. So, along N 19th Street and Lake Trafford Road. On the other two sides of the property they are 25 feet.” Question/Comments: Once these points were covered, the meeting’s attendees were given the chance to ask questions and comments. The questions/comments were: Question 1: Betty Mangas asked, “Where are we putting the preschool and afterschool?” Arol Buntzman responded, “They would go into the community center.” Betty Mangas then asked, “Is it large enough?” Arol Buntzman responded, “It’s 3100 square foot, yes it is.” Question 2: Alan Penide asked, “Where are the Habitat homes?” Canon Sandora responded, “North.” Alan Penide then asked, “Is it right North, or is a ways North?” Canon Sandora replied with, “These are actually a part of that community, but it does extend up quite a bit.” Question 3: Betty Mangas asked, “You haven’t found anything goofy out there? Like that where you can’t dig deep enough or you can’t, you know what I’m saying. Too much rock, too much something.” Arol Buntzman responded, “We have done all the borings with the Geotech study, didn’t run into any problems whatsoever from that standpoint. And from the environmental studies, the traffic studies and zoning. Canon Sandora also replied, “You name it, we done it.” Question 4: Betty Manga asked, “It’s all good?” Canon Sandora responded, “It’s all good. It’s like made for this.” 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) Question 5: Timothy Finn asked, The preschool and afterschool. Is it going to be for the residents, or what’s that intend.?” Dr. Arol Buntzman responded, “Depends upon how many children we have. It’s designed first to serve just the residents there, not to compete with other programs. In fact, we have started preliminary discussions with several of the programs that run preschool and afterschool about running this for us.” Timothy Finn then asked, “But it will be primarily for the residents?” Arol Buntzman replied with, “Yes, not as a commercial operation.” Conclusion: At that point, everyone was thanked for attending the meeting. The people that attended the meeting had encouraging and supportive words to say about the project. 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road #222 Estero, FL 33928 (239) 692-6738 February 3rd, 2020 NIM Transcribed Recording Dr. Arol Buntzman “Good evening everybody, thank you to the neighborhood information meeting. I’m Arol Buntzman, I am a chair of the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance. Which is a Florida Non-for- profit 501C3 public benefit corporation. The alliance was organized by a group of nonprofit foundations, NGO’s, faith-based organizations, and individuals that believe everyone deserves a chance to live in decent, affordable hurricane resistant housing. Our plan is to develop 128 two and three bedrooms decent, affordable, hurricane resistant, low energy, low maintenance housing units that can be rented to low income and very low income/moderate-income families that reside year-round at rents that they can afford. Our goal is to make sure that people don’t have to spend more than 30 percent of their household income on rent. As many of you know, or most of you know when homes are decent, safe and affordable its much more than a roof over a family’s head. Children are healthier, they do better in school, people on their jobs are more productive and the families have income for other basic needs on a sustainable basis while at the same time boosting the economy. When rent consumes more than half of household income there is not much left over for healthy food, health care, decent clothes, childcare, early childhood learning and after school programs.” Canon Sandora “So, thanks Dr. Arol. I am Canon Sandora I’m from Boral Engineering and Design, I am the project manager on the project. I’m going to explain the rezoning we are doing on the land that we are going for with Collier County and show you guys the site plan. I’m going to start off with my statement. The proposed affordable housing development location is a 9.52 Acre property on the corner of Lake Trafford Road and N 19th Street in Immokalee, Florida. The zoning at the time of rezoning application submitted was RSF-4, which allows for four dwelling units per acre. So RSF-4 stands for ‘Residential Single Family 4 Units per acre.’ Our application is to rezone the property from RSF-4 to RPUD. Which will allow the property to have 13.44 dwelling units per acre. So RPUD stands for ‘Residential Planned Unit Development.’ That’s 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road #222 Estero, FL 33928 (239) 692-6738 what we are looking to rezone the property to. The subject property is surrounded by several single-family residential properties and is adjacent to multifamily property also on Lake Trafford Road. The proposed development will consist of 8 sixteen-unit buildings and a community center. Along with parking, sidewalks, solid waste enclosure, bicycle racks, recreational areas, detention areas, a preserve, landscaping and utilities.” “So, I’m going to go over the plans here and start off by showing you guys the map where the project is located. Right here along Lake Trafford Road and N 19th Street. It’s this 9.52 Acre lot there.” “Does everybody have a handout to look at?” “So, here is our master site plan. And you can see we have 8 sixteen-unit buildings which adds up to 128 units. We have basically a pretty basic layout, like a nice loop with access points on Lake Trafford Road and N 19th Street there. We have a detention area in the middle of the property and we also have a preserve up here in the NW corner of the property. So that will be a nice preserve area there. And you can see by the site that there is a lot of recreational area which we want as you know Dr. Arol said to be a nice community for families. So, we have nice recreation areas kind of spread out throughout the development here so where the kids can play, and families can go outside. We have sidewalks throughout; we included a few bus parking spaces. So that’s the basic layout for the site. As I said there’s a residential multifamily 12-unit housing right over here on the other side N 19th Street. There’s some residential single family, another RPUD up here in the NW where there are some single-family homes. And the lot to the west is vacant right now.” “Any other questions for the master site plan?” Betty Mangas “I do have a question. Arol where are we putting the preschool and after school?” Dr. Arol Buntzman “ They would go into the community center which is right here.” Betty Mangas “ Is it large enough for that?” 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road #222 Estero, FL 33928 (239) 692-6738 Dr. Arol Buntzman “Its 3100 SF, yes it is.” Betty Mangas “Okay, that was my question.” Canon Sandora “Yeah , there’s a community center right over here and also a half-court basketball court right next to the community center.” Alan Penide “Where are the habitat homes?” Canon Sandora “To the North.” Alan Penide “Right north, or a ways north?” Canon Sandora “These are actually part of that community, but it does extend up quite a bit.” Alan Penide “So that’s what I see on this.” Canon Sandora “yeah, yeah” Dr. Arol Buntzman “This is the habitat buffer zone that they put in for the scrub jays.” Alan Penide “So, we really got a preserve right up against their preserve.” 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road #222 Estero, FL 33928 (239) 692-6738 Dr. Arol Buntzman “Yes.” Betty Mangas “And that’s what scrub jays are right?” Dr. Arol Buntzman “Yes, scrub jays are in their buffer zone and the county’s buffer zone over here. They came to visit us one day, so we had to do a preserve.” Betty Mangas “That’s were they are going to stay, right.” Dr. Arol Buntzman “As many of you know we entered into an affordable housing agreement with the county and agreed to set aside 70 percent of the units for low income and moderate-income families.” “Any other questions?” Canon Sandora “Can you share your names that asked questions?” Betty Mangas “I’m Betty Mangas, I asked the question about the before and after school.” Alan Penide “I am Alan Penide, I am the treasurer of marketing.” Dr. Arol Buntzman “ Thanks for joining us, before you leave could you sign in.” Canon Sandora “Dr. Arol, I have one more thing to share.” 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road #222 Estero, FL 33928 (239) 692-6738 Dr. Arol Buntzman “Yes please.” Canon Sandora “So, it’s the existing RSF-4, I wanted to make sure to include this information. It can have platted, that’s for platted lots they have to be at least 75 by 70. With setbacks that are 25 feet for the front and the rear, and also the side setbacks are seven and a half feet. So, I wanted to make sure that I share that, and that we are rezoning to the RPUD that will allow 128 units as we said before. So, I wanted to make sure I included that.” “Do we have any more questions?” Betty Mangas “ Well I just want to ask one more question. Now You haven’t found anything goofy out there? Like that where you can’t dig deep enough, or you can’t, you know what I’m saying.” Dr. Arol Buntzman “That’s a great question.” Canon Sandora “No.” Betty Mangas “Too much rock, too much something.” Dr. Arol Buntzman “We have done all the borings with the Geotech study, didn’t run into any problems whatsoever from that standpoint. And from the environmental studies, the traffic studies, zoning.” Canon Sandora “Survey. You name it we done it. You know its actually..” Betty Mangas “It’s all good?” 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road #222 Estero, FL 33928 (239) 692-6738 Canon Sandora “It’s all good.” Betty Mangas “Alright.” Canon Sandora “Its like made for this.” Timothy Fin “I do have one question. The preschool and afterschool, is it going to be for the residents, or what’s that intended?” Dr. Arol Buntzman “Depends upon how many children we have. Its designed first to serve just the residents there, not to compete with other programs. In fact, we have started preliminary discussions with several of the programs that run preschool and after school about running this for us.” Timothy Finn “But it will be primarily for the residents?” Dr. Arol Buntzman “Yes. Not as a commercial operation.” “Anything else?” “All those in favor raise your hand” **Laughter** “Well thank you very much for coming, we appreciate it.” 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9911 Corkscrew Road #222 Estero, FL 33928 (239) 692-6738 9.A.4.g Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) /9.A.4.gPacket Pg. 711Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, ?T,1 =- C.;-fir- IIE tI I l II I I I \J .IilrlL,ri+l /Id 7-/,I il.\F I i lr' \?E ! - \r BlJ \ \ l' t \ \I \1 a T I il #' t il T, I I -oo \ \\ \ I \9.A.4.gPacket Pg. 712Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, I$lrI III t I I I IIIf IilI I I [: E I tilr t,{!a:.\ I t I I -t'',+ \'-*. '- I +--'rr--.{._ I :: :. lil,r \\ t,l I,{ tl" t t.'l,' I d t 'hr tI T\ \ \ k,\tt,' l \ I E9.A.4.gPacket Pg. 713Attachment: Attachment F - Application and Back up materials (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, G-f PUBLIC H RING NOTICE (lmmokalee Fair Housing Alliance) Plann ed Unit DeveloPment Rezone Petition No'20190000734 CCPC: 17-2-Izozol BCC:t2020 Coll ier Gove rnmen t Center. Flon da?4 iami Tra 4312 329gEa st Tam imot hy Finn ) - 9:00 a.m' 9:00 a.fii'( e-8- ,3 t t I -1\ 2 9.A.4.h Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: Attachment G - Revised public hearing signage (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) I lt , *._* t BIt-I rc ARING NOl 'l cL-- (lmmokalee Fair Housing Alliance) Planned Unit Development Rezone Petition No. 20190000734 CCPC:. 7_Z_ l2OZOl - g:00 a.m. BCC: (9-8-{2020 - g:00 a.m. Collier G overnment Ce nter3299 East Ta miami Trail,Naples, Flo rida 341(Timothy Finn):239-252_43 12 J , t; ).,l:- ---7 Ar,4:{l } 2 lri I F,, -i 't /--. I .1 .r'\ t:\ rt I l\-{ * Y 9.A.4.h Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: Attachment G - Revised public hearing signage (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. RPUD (PUDZ)) 9.A.4.i Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: Attachment H - Waiver Applicant for hybrid quasi-judicial hearing- Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance (11591 : Immokalee Fair Housing 07/02/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.5 Item Summary: PL20190002635: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners amending the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05 as amended, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element to extend the availability of the Early Entry Transfer of Development Rights Bonus for property within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District -Sending Lands, and furthermore directing Transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. (Adoption Hearing) [Coordinator: Michele Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 07/02/2020 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Senior – Zoning Name: Marcia R Kendall 06/15/2020 9:05 AM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 06/15/2020 9:05 AM Approved By: Review: Road Maintenance Diane Lynch Review item Completed 06/22/2020 9:24 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 06/22/2020 9:35 AM Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management Michele Mosca Additional Reviewer Completed 06/22/2020 3:49 PM Zoning Anita Jenkins Additional Reviewer Completed 06/22/2020 4:32 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 06/22/2020 4:50 PM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 06/23/2020 3:51 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 06/23/2020 4:20 PM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 07/02/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 717 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS PL20190002635-CPSP-2019-4 (ADOPTION HEARING) CCPC: July 02, 2020 BCC: September 8, 2020 9.A.5.a Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: 00_CCPC COVER (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) TABLE OF CONTENTS CCPC – 2019 GMP Transmittal Amendment PL20190002635/CPSP-2019-4 CCPC July 02, 2020 DOCUMENT: CCPC Staff Report DOCUMENT: Ordinance DOCUMENT: Executive Summary 1)TAB: Adoption Staff Report 2)TAB: Adoption Ordinance 3)TAB: Transmittal Ex. Summary 4)TAB: Transmittal Staff Report DOCUMENT: CCPC Staff Report 5)TAB: Transmittal Resolution DOCUMENT: Transmittal Resolution with Exhibit “A” text: 6)TAB: Legal Advertisements DOCUMENT: CCPC Advertisement 9.A.5.b Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: 00_Table of Contents (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) ‒ 1 ‒ STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/ZONING DIVISION COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: July 2, 2020 RE: PETITION PL20190002635/CPSP-2019-4, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS EARLY ENTRY BONUS EXTENSION [ADOPTION HEARING] ELEMENT: FUTURE LAND USE PROPOSED AMENDMENT The subject petition is a text only amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) to extend the date of applicability of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Early Entry bonus until September 27, 2022 and is applicable to RFMUD Sending Lands. The extension of this date is intended to further incentivize participation in the TDR program. BACKGROUND: The Board of County Commissioners (Board) adopted GMP amendments in June of 2002 to establish the RFMUD including the TDR program, those amendments did not become effective until July 2003 due to a “challenge” to their statutory compliance. At that time, the TDR program only included the base TDR Credit (oneTDR Credit per five acres). In 2005, the GMP was amended to add three density bonuses to further incentivize owners of Sending Lands to participate in the TDR program, one of which is the Early Entry bonus. In particular, the Early Entry bonus was intended as an inducement for landowners to participate in the TDR program sooner than later – similar to the “early entry participation provision” in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay which was adopted in October 2002. The original Early Entry bonus was for a period of three years (from the date of the implementing Land Development Code amendment) out to 2008 and has been extended multiple times. The subject amendment is to extend the Early Entry bonus from September 27, 2018 until September 27, 2022, as directed by the Board on November 12, 2019. Two letters of support were received to initiate the subject GMP amendment. Transmittal hearings on the amendment were held on January 16, 2020 by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and on February 25, 2020 (Board). The Transmittal recommendations/actions are presented further below. Within CCPC materials provided, you will find the Transmittal Executive Summary from the Board hearing, and the Transmittal CCPC staff report. 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: 01_Adopt_staff report_CPSP-19-4 TDR EE Bonus (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) ‒ 2 ‒ In accordance with Chapter 163.3184(3)(b)1., F.S., pertaining to the Expedited State Review Process, this Transmittal package was provided to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) and other reviewing agencies on March 9, 2020. REVIEW AGENCY COMMENT LETTERS After review of the Transmitted amendment within each reviewing agency’s authorized scope of review, the DEO [who assigned review no. 20-02ESR] and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) rendered their comment letters indicating “no comment” or “no adverse impacts found.” The Comments Letters/emails received are located within materials provided to the CCPC. The remaining reviewing agencies did not provide a Comment Letter. Within CCPC materials provided is an Ordinance with Exhibit “A”; this exhibit reflects the text as approved by the Board for Transmittal. TRANSMITTAL STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Transmit to DEO. CCPC RECOMMENDATION: Transmit to DEO (vote: 7/0). BOARD ACTION: Transmit to DEO (vote: 5/0). ADOPTION After Transmittal Hearings, staff added text to the GMPA adoption Ordinance to provide for the extension of the TDR Early Entry Bonus date, by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, to make consistent with the TDR Early Entry Bonus provisions of the Land Development Code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the CCPC forward the petition to the Board with a recommendation to adopt and transmit, as revised, to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and review agencies that provided comments. LEGAL REVIEW This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office on June 9, 2020. The criteria for GMP amendments to the Future Land Use Element are in Sections 163.3177(1)(f) and 163.3177(6)(a)2, Florida Statutes. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: 01_Adopt_staff report_CPSP-19-4 TDR EE Bonus (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) PREPAREO BY: DATE, I IZ ?L iUICHELE COMPRE R. MOSCA, AICP PRINCIPAL PLANNER HENSIVE PLANNING SECTION. ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: DATE AN JENKINS. AIC MUNITY PLANNING MANAGER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION. ZONING DIVISION APPROVED BY: DATE 6-,r/_2t2o JAMES FRENCH. DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Petition Number: P120190002635/CPSP-20194 Staff Report for J uly 2. 2020 CPCC meeting. NorE: This petition has been tentatively scheduled for the september 22,2o2o BCC meeting. CCPC Sbmpr CPSP-2019-4 Gjtr-nES Planning SeNirs\compch€nsrve\comp Phnning GMP DATA\coop Phn Amendmenb\2o19 GMpAs oubde ol cyct6\p120190002635-cpsp-2019-4 EE ToR BonljslCCPC E BCC Adoptbn -3- /t''''22 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: 01_Adopt_staff report_CPSP-19-4 TDR EE Bonus (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) [19-CMP-01068/1538813/1]52 PL20190002635 5/5/20 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. *** *** *** *** are a break in text 1 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. 20 - _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO EXTEND THE AVAILABILITY OF THE EARLY ENTRY TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS BONUS FOR PROPERTY WITHIN THE RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT-SENDING LANDS, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. [PL20190002635] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Community Planning Act, formerly the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Collier County staff has initiated this amendment to the Future Land Use element; and WHEREAS, Collier County transmitted the Growth Management Plan amendments to the Department of Economic Opportunity for preliminary review on March 9, 2020, after public hearings before the Collier County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Department of Economic Opportunity reviewed the amendments to the Future Land Use Element to the Growth Management Plan and transmitted its comments in writing to Collier County within the time provided by law; and WHEREAS, Collier County, has 180 days from receipt of the Comments Report from the Department of Economic Opportunity to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendments to the Growth Management Plan; and CAO 9.A.5.d Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: 02_Adoption Ordinance - 050520 (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) [19-CMP-01068/1538813/1]52 PL20190002635 5/5/20 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. *** *** *** *** are a break in text 2 of 3 WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered additional information, data and analysis supporting adoption of these amendments, including the following: the Collier County Staff Report, the documents entitled Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendments and other documents, testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission held on ____________, 2020, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on ____________, 2020; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of the law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The amendments to the Future Land Use Element attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference, are hereby adopted in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, and shall be transmitted to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after the state land planning agency notifies the local government that the plan amendment package is complete. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commenced before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which resolution shall be sent to the state land planning agency. CAO 9.A.5.d Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: 02_Adoption Ordinance - 050520 (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) [19-CMP-01068/1538813/1]52 PL20190002635 5/5/20 Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions. *** *** *** *** are a break in text 3 of 3 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by supermajority vote this _____ day of _____________, 2020. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA __________________________ BY: ______________________________ Deputy Clerk Burt L. Saunders, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: ________________________________ Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A – Text Amendment HFAC 5-5-20 CAO 9.A.5.d Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: 02_Adoption Ordinance - 050520 (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT “A” FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** I.URBAN DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** II.AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** A.Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** B.Rural Fringe Mixed Use District *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 1. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR), and Sending, Neutral, and Receiving Designations: *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** A)Receiving Lands: *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** B)Neutral Lands: *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** C)Sending Lands: *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 1. Sending Lands are located entirely within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use … *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 2.Base Severance Rate: *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 3. Conditions Applicable to Base and Bonus TDR Credits: *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 4. Environmental Restoration and Maintenance TDR Bonus: *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 5.Conveyance TDR Bonus: *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 6. Early Entry TDR Bonus: An Early Entry TDR Bonus shall be available in the form of an additional one TDR Credit for each base TDR Credit severed from Sending Lands from March 5, 2004 until September 27, 2022 2018, unless further extended by resolution by the Board of County Commissioners. Early Entry TDR Bonus Credits may be used after the termination of the bonus period. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** CAO 9.A.5.d Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: 02_Adoption Ordinance - 050520 (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) CPSP-2019-4 Early Entry TDR bonus Ext GMP Amendment Page 1 of 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve a Growth Management Plan Amendment for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for review and Comments response for an amendment to extend the Transfer of Development Rights Early Entry bonus. (Transmittal Hearing) PL20190002635/CPSP-2019-4 OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve an amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP), pertaining to the Transfer of Development Rights program, for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies. CONSIDERATIONS: • Chapter 163, F.S., provides for an amendment process for a local government’s adopted Comprehensive Plan. • Collier County Resolution No. 12-234 provides for a public petition process to amend the GMP. • The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), sitting as the “local planning agency” under Chapter 163.3174, F.S., held their Transmittal hearing for this petition on January 16, 2020 (petition PL20190002635/CPSP-2019-4). • This Transmittal hearing considers an amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). This petition seeks to amend the GMP, adopted by Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) by extending the effective date of the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Early Entry bonus to September 27, 2022. This is a text amendment only, there is no map change proposed for this amendment. The extension of this date is intended to further incentivize participation in the TDR program. The proposed amended Subdistrict text, as recommended by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), is depicted in Ordinance Exhibit “A.” The complete staff analysis of this petition is provided in the CCPC Staff Report. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impacts to Collier County resulting from this amendment are for staff time to prepare the amendment and costs for the associated legal advertising/public notice for the public hearings. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of the proposed amendment by the Board for Transmittal and its submission to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies will commence the Department’s thirty (30) day review process and ultimately return the amendment to the CCPC and the Board for Adoption hearings tentatively to be held in the Spring/Summer of 2020. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment is authorized by, and subject to the procedures established in, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, The 9.A.5.e Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Ex_Summary_CPSP-2019-4 (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) CPSP-2019-4 Early Entry TDR bonus Ext GMP Amendment Page 2 of 4 Community Planning Act, and by Collier County Resolution No. 12-234, as amended. The Board should consider the following criteria in making its decision: Section 163.3177(1)(f): All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. 1. Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, data, and supporting documents for proposed plans and plan amendments shall be made available for public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. Support data or summaries are not subject to the compliance review process, but the comprehensive plan must be clearly based on appropriate data. Support data or summaries may be used to aid in the determination of compliance and consistency. 2. Data must be taken from professionally accepted sources. The application of a methodology utilized in data collection or whether a particular methodology is professionally accepted may be evaluated. However, the evaluation may not include whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Original data collection by local governments is not required. However, local governments may use original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. 3. The comprehensive plan shall be based upon permanent and seasonal population estimates and projections, which shall either be those published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research or generated by the local government based upon a professionally acceptable methodology. The plan must be based on at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections as published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10-year planning period unless otherwise limited under s. 380.05, including related rules of the Administration Commission. Absent physical limitations on population growth, population projections for each municipality, and the unincorporated area within a county must, at a minimum, be reflective of each area’s proportional share of the total county population and the total county population growth. Section 163.3177(6)(a) 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: (a) The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. (b) The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. (c) The character of undeveloped land. 9.A.5.e Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Ex_Summary_CPSP-2019-4 (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) CPSP-2019-4 Early Entry TDR bonus Ext GMP Amendment Page 3 of 4 (d) The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. (e) The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. (f) The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. (g) The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s.330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. (h) The discouragement of urban sprawl. (i) The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community’s economy. (j) The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Section 163.3177(1)(f), FS. In addition, Section 163.3177(6)(a)2, FS provides that FLUE plan amendments shall be based on surveys, studies and data regarding the area, as applicable including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of non-conforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The need to modify land uses and development patterns with antiquated subdivisions. i. The discouragement of urban sprawl. j. The need for job creation, capital investment and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community’s economy. This item is approved as to form and legality. It requires a majority vote for approval because this is a transmittal hearing. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: That the CCPC forward petition PL20190002635/CPSP-2019-4 to the Board with a recommendation of approval. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition at their January 16, 2020 meeting and voted 7/0 to forward the subject petition to the Board with a recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department 9.A.5.e Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Ex_Summary_CPSP-2019-4 (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) CPSP-2019-4 Early Entry TDR bonus Ext GMP Amendment Page 4 of 4 of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies. There were no public speakers at the CCPC meeting and no correspondence has been received for this petition. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION: That the BCC approve petition PL20190002635/CPSP-2019-4 for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, and other statutorily required agencies, for review. Prepared by: David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 9.A.5.e Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Ex_Summary_CPSP-2019-4 (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) PL20190002635/CPSP-2019-4 1 STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: January 16, 2019 RE: PETITION PL20190002635/CPSP-2019-4, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS EARLY ENTRY BONUS EXTENSION [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] AGENT/APPLICANT Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Collier County Government 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment is a text amendment only and is applicable to Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) Sending Lands (depicted in orange color on the excerpt from the countywide Future Land Use Map on the next page). REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant proposes a large-scale GMP amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) to extend the date of applicability of the RFMUD Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Early Entry bonus until September 27, 2022. The proposed amended text is depicted on Resolution Exhibit A. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is requesting this change to facilitate participation in the RFMUD TDR program. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: The Board of County Commissioners (BCC) adopted GMP amendments in June of 2002 to establish the RFMUD including the TDR program (those amendments did not become effective until July 2003 due to a “challenge” to their statutory compliance). At that time, the T DR program only included the base TDR Credit (1 TDR Credit per 5 acres). In 2005, the GMP was amended to add three density bonuses to further incentivize owners of Sending Lands to participate in the TDR program, one of which is the Early Entry bonus. In particular, the Early Entry bonus was intended as an inducement for land owners to participate in the TDR program sooner than later – similar to the “early entry participation provision” in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay which was adopted in October 2002. The original Early Entry bonus was for a period of three years (from the date of the implementing Land Development Code amendment) out to 2008 and has been extended multiple times. The subject amendment is to extend the Early Entry bonus 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: 04_Transmittal Staff Report CPSP-2019-4 _FNL (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) PL20190002635/CPSP-2019-4 2 from September 27, 2018 until September 27, 2022 (as directed by the Board of County Commissioners on November 12, 2019). Prior to that time, the RFMUD Restudy-based GMP amendments should be completed, which may or may not include changes to this Early Entry bonus provision. [Note: Two letters of support were received for the staff request to the Board in November 2019 seeking direction to initiate the subject GMP amendment.] Assuming this GMP amendment is approved for transmittal to the statutorily required review agencies, it will return to the CCPC and BCC for Adoption hearings. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) NOTES: As this is not a site-specific GMP amendment, a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) is not required by LDC Section 10.03.05 F. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office on December 16, 2019. The criteria for GMP amendments to the Future Land Use Element are in Sections 163.3177(1)(f) and 163.3177(6)(a)2, Florida Statutes. [HFAC] 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: 04_Transmittal Staff Report CPSP-2019-4 _FNL (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) PL20190002635/CPSP-2019-4 3 CCPC StaffRpt CPSP-2019-4 G:\CDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2019 GMPAs Outside of Cycles\PL20190002635_CPSP-2019- 4 EE TDR Bonus\CCPC & BCC Transmittal dw/12-5-19 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: 04_Transmittal Staff Report CPSP-2019-4 _FNL (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) RESOLUTION NO. 2020- 36 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO EXTEND THE AVAILABILITY OF THE EARLY ENTRY TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS BONUS FOR PROPERTY WITHIN THE RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT-SENDING LANDS, AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. [PL20190002635] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, staff prepared an amendment to the Future Land Use Element; and WHEREAS, on January 16, 2020, the Collier County Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority granted to it by Section 163.3174, F.S., and has recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, on February 25, 2020, the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing approved the transmittal of the proposed amendment to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) have thirty (30) days to review the proposed amendment and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier County its comments within said thirty (30) days pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment within one hundred and eighty (180) days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and 19-CMP-01068/1525044/1]35 2/25/20 Page 1 of 2 Words underlined are additions,words struck through are deletions. 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: 05_Transmittal Resolution 2020-030 (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) WHEREAS, the DEO, within five (5) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted Growth Management Plan Amendment, must notify the County of any deficiencies of the Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), F.S. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendment prior to final adoption. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote th•is a 5 day of.Fe.b r l t,Lr y, 2020. 1 1 {ATTES,T: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ex 0°4CRYS1I . KINZEL, CLERK COLLIE OUNTY, FLO DA s, BY: dW4IDA , ;' °'°1,4•1, u erk BURT L. SAUNDERS, Chairman signature on y. Approved as to form and legality: 10tt A Jo Hei i Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A—Proposed Text Amendment 19-CMP-01068/1525044/1]35 2/25/20 Page 2 of 2 Words underlined are additions,words struck through are deletions. 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: 05_Transmittal Resolution 2020-030 (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION I. URBAN DESIGNATION II. AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION A. Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District B. Rural Fringe Mixed Use District 1. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR), and Sending,Neutral, and Receiving Designations: A) Receiving Lands: B) Neutral Lands: C) Sending Lands: 1. Sending Lands are located entirely within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use ... 2. Base Severance Rate: 3. Conditions Applicable to Base and Bonus TDR Credits: 4. Environmental Restoration and Maintenance TDR Bonus: 5. Conveyance TDR Bonus: 6. Early Entry TDR Bonus: An Early Entry TDR Bonus shall be available in the form of an additional one TDR Credit for each base TDR Credit severed from Sending Lands from March 5, 2004 until September 27, 2022 284-8. Early Entry TDR Bonus Credits may be used after the termination of the bonus period. Page 1 of 1 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: 05_Transmittal Resolution 2020-030 (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension) 9.A.5.h Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: Ad as posted 6-12-2020_PL20190002635 (12215 : TDR Early Entry Bonus Credit Extension)